{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "id": "red-threads-public-editorial",
  "version": "2026-09-20.editorial-v2.authority-and-delivery",
  "title": "Red Threads — The future, by permission",
  "description": "Ofcom testimony on collection limits, CLARITY's procedural vote and UK PDC's announced capital process. Prior evidence and the research library preserved.",
  "demo": false,
  "nodes": [
    {
      "id": "5rights",
      "label": "5Rights Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A UK foundation founded by Beeban Kidron that advocates changes to digital services and regulation to protect children’s rights.",
      "aliases": [
        "Five Rights",
        "5 Rights"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Children’s digital-rights advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/5rights",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "5rights",
        "name": "5Rights Foundation",
        "role": "Children’s digital-rights advocacy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "A UK foundation founded by Beeban Kidron that advocates changes to digital services and regulation to protect children’s rights.",
        "why": "It connects philanthropic grants, legislative campaigning and paid lobbying. Those are practical channels through which an NGO can influence digital rules.",
        "about": [
          "Oak’s 2023 annual report lists a $2 million three-year core-support award. A separate US lobbying contract documents work on California’s 2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code. A general grant cannot be assigned to a particular lobbying action without the relevant terms or spending records."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Five Rights",
          "5 Rights"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: About us",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 17
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A UK foundation founded by Beeban Kidron that advocates changes to digital services and regulation to protect children’s rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Child-rights advocacy translated into legislation",
        "significance": "5Rights connects philanthropic support with legislative campaigning and a documented paid lobbying arrangement. Its work is important to the movement of children’s-design concepts between jurisdictions and into rules affecting digital services.",
        "background": [
          "Oak’s 2023 annual report lists a $2 million three-year core-support award. A separate US lobbying contract documents work on California’s 2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code. A general grant cannot be assigned to a particular lobbying action without the relevant terms or spending records."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Contract for May-September2022 services at USD10,000/month; five USD10,000 receipts are reported over date ranges, not exact bank dates. Client owns contract work including drafts; specified nonpublic disclosure and expenses require consent/advance approval. No blanket editorial-approval clause or exercised output approval established. Neither a UK-government source nor the later2023 Oak award is established as this contract funding. Financial details: value: 50,000; currency: USD; kind: five registrant-reported receipts; period: Ranges June2-October4,2022 for May-September services; see filingp21",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e157"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$50k · paid lobbying contract",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "Capitol Connection",
            "date": "Services 2022; filed 27 Jun 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Original2022 California analyses confirm5Rights co-sponsorship. Chaptered text under18 coverage and allowed applying child protections to all consumers instead of estimating age. Kidron sought under18, but causation of the final provision and present enforceability were not assessed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e1"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
                "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB2273",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Sponsored California adaptation",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "Historical UK / California codes"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "5Rights asked for privacy-preserving assurance as a criterion, with minimal data collection, limited retention and security; its proposed on-device/result-only approach sought to avoid a central identity database linked to online activity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-proposed-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights privacy criterion proposal · March 2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested express privacy criterion",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights privacy criterion proposal · March 2024",
            "date": "Document labelled March 2024; exact submission day not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "5Rights argued for age ranges and a broader ecosystem, including privacy-preserving age tokens, for age-appropriate experiences. Its criticism of the draft as binary is the respondent's characterization.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-proposed-token"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended age tokens in broader assurance ecosystem",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
            "date": "Document 17 July 2024."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "5Rights recommended numerical thresholds tied to risk/age ranges and urged Ofcom to consider certification to help services choose age-assurance partners, citing IEEE 2089.1–2024 and ACCS.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-certification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "urged standards and certification consideration",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
            "date": "Document labelled October 2025; exact submission day not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "General operating support paid during 2023; this later payment cannot fund an earlier 2022 transaction without additional evidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e154"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omidyar Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$850k paid · 2023",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Research award; cash disbursement not verified. Historical zero disbursement field is not a current payment total.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e163"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
                "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rothschild Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£150k award · AI / EdTech",
            "sourceName": "Rothschild Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "Awarded 18 Jul 2025; planned 2025–28"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "5Rights appears among the campaign's supporter links. Support does not establish steering rights or funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Child Safety ON",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "Child Safety ON",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "Who funded and contributed",
            "text": "The report's back cover separately acknowledges 5Rights Foundation funding of the DFC centre , describing DFC as a joint LSE/5Rights research centre. Centre support is not evidence of a report-specific earmark. No amount, disbursement, grant conditions, manuscript-approval right or publication veto was acquired.",
            "matched": [
              "5Rights Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3819585c069383731e19cb4296142dad0c60f747559fae35189bbe5ccfb4bc2f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: About us",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "5Rights Foundation campaigns to make digital services answerable to children's rights. Founded by Beeban Kidron, it combines philanthropic support, technical-policy proposals and legislative work, including a documented paid lobbying operation supporting California's Age-Appropriate Design Code.",
          "structuralRole": "Moving child-rights proposals into legislation and technical standards",
          "significance": "5Rights is a key policy exporter. Its research and legislative campaigning connect foundation money with the design requirements, age-assurance methods and certification proposals that can reshape how online services admit and treat users.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "5Rights Foundation is a UK advocacy organization founded by Beeban Kidron. Its central project is to make children's rights a design requirement for digital services. That gives it an interest in how platforms assess users' ages, configure their products and demonstrate that they have considered children's welfare. Kidron's position in the House of Lords also gives this work a direct parliamentary connection.",
            "The organization has substantial philanthropic backing. Oak Foundation's 2023 report lists a $2 million three-year core-support award. Omidyar Network's tax returns record $600,000 in general operating support paid in 2021 and $850,000 in 2023. Later disclosed awards support legal standards, research and technical norms. This kind of core funding sustains the staff and specialist work needed to remain involved through a lengthy legislative process.",
            "California supplies an unusually concrete example of that process. Official analyses identify 5Rights as a co-sponsor of the 2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code. A Capitol Connection filing records a $50,000 lobbying engagement for five months of work. The associated material includes drafts, amendments and correspondence with legislative offices. Kidron's letters argued for retaining protection through age seventeen as opponents sought lower age cutoffs.",
            "In the UK, 5Rights has pressed for age tokens, privacy protections and standards that help services choose assurance providers. It has also called for premarket certification of technology affecting children. Ofcom accepted some ideas and rejected others, including a separate privacy criterion because data-protection law already applied. The resulting picture is an organization repeatedly turning a broad rights claim into practical proposals about product design, admission to services and proof of compliance."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
              "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
              "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
              "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
              "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "kidron",
      "label": "Beeban Kidron",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "The founder of 5Rights and a member of the UK House of Lords involved in online-safety and AI legislation.",
      "aliases": [
        "Baroness Kidron"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Peer & 5Rights founder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/kidron",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "kidron",
        "name": "Beeban Kidron",
        "role": "Peer & 5Rights founder",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "The founder of 5Rights and a member of the UK House of Lords involved in online-safety and AI legislation.",
        "why": "Her public roles connect child-protection advocacy with AI-policy campaigning. A named parliamentary amendment provides a more specific connection than simply appearing at the same event.",
        "about": [
          "The investigation identifies Kidron as a sponsor of a ControlAI-backed AI emergency-shutdown amendment in July 2026. That establishes legislative participation; it does not show that a 5Rights grant financed ControlAI."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Baroness Kidron"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: About us",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The founder of 5Rights and a member of the UK House of Lords involved in online-safety and AI legislation.",
        "structuralRole": "A bridge between NGO advocacy and Parliament",
        "significance": "Kidron combines the founding role at 5Rights with a seat in the House of Lords. Her named participation in online-safety and AI measures connects civil-society campaigning to the formal legislative process; each amendment still has its own status and outcome.",
        "background": [
          "The investigation identifies Kidron as a sponsor of a ControlAI-backed AI emergency-shutdown amendment in July 2026. That establishes legislative participation; it does not show that a 5Rights grant financed ControlAI."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parkinson specifically credited Kidron's work relating to Amendment 124 and thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for continued collaboration over preceding months.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-credit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited work on age-assurance principles",
            "sourceName": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
            "targetName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "date": "6 July 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e140"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter reports industry pressure for under13/under16 and seeks under18. Specific industry proponents unidentified; exact legislative effect not attributed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-kidron-stern"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Henry Stern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sought support against lower age cutoffs",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Henry Stern",
            "date": "2022-08-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Lords Amendment 84. Its status is Not moved; this does not establish enacted shutdown authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e2"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was listed as a sponsor of the unmoved amendment",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "date": "2026-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Her own account of work with her team and bill authors after feedback; no authority to direct legislator or funding-source inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-kidron-portantino"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthony Portantino",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "asked to retain under-18 coverage; reported amendment work",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Anthony Portantino",
            "date": "2022-08-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Amendment 124; Parkinson was lead member and Clement-Jones also sponsored it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-cosponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-sponsored",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
            "date": "July 2023 Report-stage amendment."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Kidron proposed purpose restrictions and deletion/secure-storage wording through Amendment 125 to Amendment 124.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-privacy-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "tabled privacy addition",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
            "date": "July 2023; spoken to 10 July 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-signature-kidron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed individual signatory",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: About us",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Beeban Kidron founded 5Rights Foundation and serves in the UK House of Lords. Her work connects NGO campaigning with legislative negotiation: she has pressed for children's design protections, worked on age-assurance provisions and supported proposals restricting advanced AI.",
          "structuralRole": "Connecting advocacy organizations with parliamentary drafting and negotiation",
          "significance": "Kidron is significant because she carries policy between settings: a foundation, California legislative offices and the House of Lords. Her record contains specific amendment work and credited contributions, giving substance to an otherwise vague idea of political access.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Beeban Kidron occupies two important positions in this investigation: founder and declared chair of 5Rights Foundation, and member of the UK House of Lords. The combination lets her help develop a policy agenda through an advocacy organization and pursue it inside a legislature. Her most sustained recorded work concerns the treatment of children by digital services.",
            "The California record shows her operating across borders. In August 2022 she wrote to legislators Anthony Portantino and Henry Stern about the proposed Age-Appropriate Design Code. Her letters described work with her team and the bill's authors, and urged them to retain coverage for everyone under eighteen. This was a specific contest over who the rules would protect and which services would have to respond, supported by 5Rights' paid lobbying engagement.",
            "Her UK influence is also visible in the legislative record. In July 2023 Lord Parkinson credited her work on age-assurance principles and thanked her for months of collaboration. She co-sponsored Amendment 124, which was agreed. She also tabled a privacy addition addressing purpose restrictions, deletion and secure storage; that separate amendment was not moved. The distinction captures a legislator negotiating both access controls and limits on the data collected to operate them.",
            "Kidron also appears in AI-governance campaigning. ControlAI lists her as a supporter, and Parliament lists her among the sponsors of a July 2026 emergency-shutdown amendment that was not moved. Her role is therefore broader than a single children's-safety campaign. She is a recurring bridge between civil-society proposals and the formal process through which governments decide whether those proposals should acquire legal force."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
              "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
              "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
            },
            {
              "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
              "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
            },
            {
              "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
              "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
            },
            {
              "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
              "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "controlai",
      "label": "ControlAI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An advocacy organisation campaigning for restrictions on the development of artificial superintelligence, including legislative proposals and creator partnerships.",
      "aliases": [
        "Control AI"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "AI-policy campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/controlai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "controlai",
        "name": "ControlAI",
        "role": "AI-policy campaign",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An advocacy organisation campaigning for restrictions on the development of artificial superintelligence, including legislative proposals and creator partnerships.",
        "why": "It connects policy drafting, parliamentary supporters and audience-building. Its published work makes those activities visible even where its donors and contract terms remain unclear.",
        "about": [
          "In the UK, ControlAI is the trading name of Secure Future Research Ltd. Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens have documented director and voting rights. The organisation has also proposed an AI-governance framework called A Narrow Path.",
          "ControlAI and Rational Animations publicly acknowledged a partnership. Its fee and agreement were not obtained. The organisation behind Sabine Hossenfelder’s original account of an offer remains unidentified."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Control AI"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 28
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An advocacy organisation campaigning for restrictions on the development of artificial superintelligence, including legislative proposals and creator partnerships.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposals, parliamentary access and creator outreach",
        "significance": "ControlAI brings policy drafting, political access and public persuasion into one campaign. The useful structural question is how those activities connect: who defines the proposal, who recruits an audience, which legal entity contracts or spends, and which public official adopts a measure.",
        "background": [
          "In the UK, ControlAI is the trading name of Secure Future Research Ltd. Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens have documented director and voting rights. The organisation has also proposed an AI-governance framework called A Narrow Path.",
          "ControlAI and Rational Animations publicly acknowledged a partnership. Its fee and agreement were not obtained. The organisation behind Sabine Hossenfelder’s original account of an offer remains unidentified."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The Sanders–Casar connection",
            "text": "ControlAI’s September 9 post says it consulted on the announced US framework. Miotti distinguishes the lawmakers’ broad pause from ControlAI’s narrower approach. Neither a fee nor the consulting legal entity is identified; sole authorship is not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Update: the Sabine approach is identified",
            "text": "ControlAI identifies itself behind the approach Hossenfelder described. It disputes her account of editorial demands. Read the dedicated account for both positions and the missing correspondence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              },
              {
                "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A £2.5m historical donor trail",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports two payments to Secure Future Research, the company now registered as CONTROLAI, in November 2023 and April 2024. No inspected record assigns those funds to the Sabine approach or any particular creator.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "How others describe working alongside it",
            "text": "PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI, MIRI and FLI as policy and expert-consensus counterparts, while PauseAI builds organized public pressure. This is PauseAI’s declared strategy, not a signed command arrangement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Creator sponsorship terms",
            "text": "ControlAI reports nine paid sponsored videos and nine unpaid collaborations. It says it bought 60–90-second segments, agreed topics in advance, required a named risk-statement citation and no AI-company endorsement, and disclosed its sponsorship. These are its own aggregate claims; signed contracts and video-by-video disclosures remain the next audit.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI creator outreach",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "22-page download defines ASI through specified UK security harm and proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction and expert oversight. Separate from emergency-shutdown amendment; not enacted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e108"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
                "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI proposed UK ASI bill",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published proposed ASI prohibition text",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI proposed UK ASI bill",
            "date": "Draft captured 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published Direct Institutional Plan and impact report describe introductions, dinners, briefings, signatures and public statements; claimed conversion effects not independently audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e101"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
                "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Parliament",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefings, support requests, drafting",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2024–2026 reported strategy/activity"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CASIR says its grant committee would initially reflect ControlAI’s institutional plan. This is CASIR’s proposed design, not verified ControlAI direction of an operating fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e178"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft governance",
                "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Message-based grant criteria",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "used its plan as a reference in the draft grant design",
            "sourceName": "Message-based grant criteria",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Employer posting describes partner recruitment, briefings and script work focused on extinction risk. £60k–£80k salary is advertised employee pay, not creator fees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e100"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
                "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefing and script drafting/review",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "date": "Posting read 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ControlAI explicitly acknowledges unspecified red lines in the general call, then promotes its own prohibition and A Narrow Path. Does not bind other signatories.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "A Narrow Path",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "promotes ASI prohibition as red-lines implementation",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "A Narrow Path",
            "date": "25 September2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e133"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anneliese Dodds",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Anneliese Dodds",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Specific output0bnxF9YfyFI names ControlAI and links its political-mobilization tools. Cash amount, script authority and actual contracting entity unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-rational-partnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rational Animations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "jointly acknowledged published video collaboration",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Rational Animations",
            "date": "Output2May2025, partner announcement3May2025; descriptions captured8Sep2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Browne's own March 2025 committee testimony says ControlAI and Logically regularly emailed and encouraged questions. No payment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e104"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Des Browne",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Emails encouraging parliamentary questions",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Des Browne",
            "date": "2025-03-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "A completed ControlAI collaboration is acknowledged on both sides",
            "text": "The inspected SciShow video of 31 October 2025 likewise names ControlAI and its lawmaker tool in its description. The Hey AI video linked by Frame does not name CAIS in the inspected description, but Frame's claim of a CAIS contract does not establish this particular video was the contract output. Neither an absent description reference nor absent paid-promotion metadata proves a disclosure violation. Those narrower checks are preserved as boundary findings, not accusations.",
            "matched": [
              "ControlAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86fead6d2796294a2b43d8731b4f34909ae96b159c0f6f5994a1dcee005f9722"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "1. ControlAI's direct fundraising appeal",
            "text": "Source: https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan Title: Preventing extinction from ASI on a $50M yearly budget. By Andrea Miotti, Alex Amadori and Gabriel Alfour; April 20, 2026. Opened/read.",
            "matched": [
              "ControlAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d09cbcd73ca6020015556f454923e8f14f58480358891137d1d7c336402f2b7c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine",
            "text": "ControlAI reports nine paid and nine unpaid videos, around 1,000 creators contacted and more than 60 briefed. Those are its own campaign figures. The post documents its stated sponsorship process, including contracts, review, citations and disclosure; it does not demonstrate Paul's participation. See adjacent-controlai-creator-outreach.md for the competing accounts and source limits.",
            "matched": [
              "ControlAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "96058505030b364074860883485385324275ca4adb1125e6c177b2185a30ff98"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine",
            "text": "Separately, ControlAI's 8 September post, by Andrea Miotti and Max Winga , says it was the organization negotiating with Hossenfelder and disputes her account. The supplied Sabine transcript itself left her offeror unnamed while separately naming ControlAI as sponsoring other creators. The correct update is: ControlAI subsequently self-identified as the organization involved. Its post does not publish the underlying emails or contracts, and Paul is not named.",
            "matched": [
              "ControlAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "408698d64e19b490136404d38e70c9ef10c6ffeeccf2c7d471613dccb8d17d1f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK legal-entity notice",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/privacy"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
            "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
            "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
            "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI — Campaign and activities",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          },
          {
            "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
          },
          {
            "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
            "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-16",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "ControlAI campaigns to prevent the development of artificial superintelligence. It combines legislative proposals, briefings for politicians, creator partnerships and public mobilization, with organizations in the UK and United States. Its work connects arguments about AI catastrophe to proposals for enforceable limits on who may build advanced systems.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects public persuasion to proposed AI prohibitions",
          "significance": "ControlAI is a central organizer in the AI branch: it develops a political programme, recruits audiences and works with lawmakers who can carry that programme into formal debate. Those functions reinforce one another.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "ControlAI seeks to make the development of artificial superintelligence a prohibited activity. Its programme includes A Narrow Path and more specific legislative proposals. Published plans describe recruiting political allies through briefings, introductions, public statements and sustained contact. Andrea Miotti leads the organization; Connor Leahy moved into its US leadership after his work at Conjecture. The campaign draws on people with technical AI backgrounds as well as political and communications experience.",
            "The persuasion work is now unusually visible. On 8 September 2026, Miotti and creator-outreach lead Max Winga identified ControlAI as the organization behind the approach Sabine Hossenfelder had described. Hossenfelder and ControlAI disagree about the editorial conditions attached to that offer. ControlAI also has an acknowledged partnership with Rational Animations. These relationships place its policy arguments in front of audiences well beyond parliamentary offices or specialist AI forums.",
            "Its financial history includes two donations reported by Jaan Tallinn to its UK company: £500,000 in November 2023 and £2 million in April 2024. The company, formerly Secure Future Research, changed its registered name to CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026. Miotti and Eva Behrens have recorded voting and director-appointment rights there.",
            "The current political reach crosses borders. ControlAI says it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework announced in September, while Miotti distinguishes that framework’s broad pause from ControlAI’s narrower preference. PauseAI describes its own mobilization as complementary to ControlAI’s policy work. Together these records show how funding, communication, organizing and legislative access can support a sustained restriction campaign."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "ControlAI's Creator Outreach",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
            },
            {
              "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
            },
            {
              "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
              "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
            },
            {
              "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
              "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "am84",
      "label": "Lords Amendment 84",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not moved. Emergency shutdown proposal distinct from ASI-prohibition draft. Lords Amendment 84, July 2026; status Not moved. Proposal, not enacted authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/am84",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "am84",
        "name": "Lords Amendment 84",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not moved. Emergency shutdown proposal distinct from ASI-prohibition draft. Lords Amendment 84, July 2026; status Not moved. Proposal, not enacted authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not moved. Emergency shutdown proposal distinct from ASI-prohibition draft. Lords Amendment 84, July 2026; status Not moved. Proposal, not enacted authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lords Amendment 84 was a July 2026 proposal concerning emergency AI shutdown powers. The parliamentary record identifies its sponsors and credits ControlAI with the proposal, but its status at the retained cutoff was “Not moved.” It did not create an exercised shutdown power.",
        "structuralRole": "A specific attempt to put campaign ideas into law",
        "significance": "This amendment gives the advocacy network an identifiable legal object to follow: named sponsors, proposed authority and a recorded procedural result. It also distinguishes an emergency-shutdown mechanism from a broader proposal to prohibit superintelligence, which would have different scope and consequences.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Sponsors and attribution",
            "text": "The recorded sponsors include Beeban Kidron and Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, with Clement-Jones and Harding also named in the retained account. Hansard on 14 July 2026 attributes the emergency-shutdown proposal to ControlAI. That is evidence of credited legislative work, while the “Not moved” status limits claims about adoption or enforcement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              },
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e2",
              "e3",
              "e112"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Lords Amendment 84. Its status is Not moved; this does not establish enacted shutdown authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e2"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was listed as a sponsor of the unmoved amendment",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "date": "2026-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Other sponsors Clement-Jones and Harding. Official status Not moved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e112"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sponsored the unmoved amendment",
            "sourceName": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath",
            "targetName": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "date": "2026-07; checked 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Lords debate attributes the emergency AI-shutdown proposal to ControlAI. Shared legislative work does not establish funding from 5Rights or its donors.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e3"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              },
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was credited in Hansard with the shutdown proposal",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "date": "2026-07-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ncose",
      "label": "NCOSE",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "National Center on Sexual Exploitation; public co-signatory linking two distinct campaigns.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ncose",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ncose",
        "name": "NCOSE",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "National Center on Sexual Exploitation; public co-signatory linking two distinct campaigns.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "National Center on Sexual Exploitation; public co-signatory linking two distinct campaigns."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
            "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
            "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
            "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The National Center on Sexual Exploitation is an advocacy organisation appearing as a co-signatory in both the July 2025 payment campaign and a separate coalition letter opposing a federal moratorium on state AI regulation. It also has disclosed research and philanthropic support tied to distinct purposes.",
        "structuralRole": "Advocacy bridge between sexual-exploitation campaigning and broader AI-policy opposition",
        "significance": "NCOSE connects two documented public advocacy episodes through its own participation. This is a concrete overlap of organisations and positions, but does not turn all signatories into one funded alliance or establish that an AI-policy organisation directed the payment campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Campaign participation and separate resource streams",
            "text": "Haley McNamara signed the 10 July payment letter for NCOSE. The organisation also appears among more than 140 signatories to the 30 June AI-moratorium letter. A National Institute of Justice record shows a research award first made in 2020, with total funding of US$239,946 and closed status, for sex-trafficking demand-reduction research. The Jensen Project identifies policy-grant support across 2021–2025, and the Pentecost foundation page names support without a verified amount. None of those records earmarks funds for the gaming campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
                "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
                "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
                "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e5",
              "e13",
              "e38",
              "e39",
              "e40"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Jensen identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee, describing law-centre work, survivor participation, research, convening and awareness. No independently verified amount or approval rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e39"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
                "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Jensen Project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Policy grant support; amount unknown",
            "sourceName": "The Jensen Project",
            "targetName": "NCOSE",
            "date": "2021–2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011, first awarded 2020, total funding to date US$239,946 and closed. Purpose: sex-trafficking demand-reduction research; not evidence of gaming-campaign funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e38"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
                "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "US National Institute of Justice",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "US$239,946 research award",
            "sourceName": "US National Institute of Justice",
            "targetName": "NCOSE",
            "date": "First award 2020; closed by 2026-09-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Family foundation page says it supports NCOSE. Secondary dollar figures were not inspected in primary returns and are excluded; no current board/control inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e40"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
                "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pentecost family foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named philanthropic support",
            "sourceName": "Pentecost family foundation",
            "targetName": "NCOSE",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "NCOSE appears among more than 140 organisations opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation. A bounded joint advocacy act, not a general alliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signatory",
            "sourceName": "NCOSE",
            "targetName": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
            "date": "2025-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Haley McNamara signed for NCOSE. Public campaign endorsement; no transfer of funds or directing authority established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e5"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signed through Haley McNamara",
            "sourceName": "NCOSE",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "4. NCOSE and the limited bridge to FLI",
            "text": "Interpretation: NCOSE connects these two public advocacy episodes. The broad letter establishes a shared policy position and joint advocacy act. It supplies no evidence that FLI funded Collective Shout, directed its payment campaign, or participated in its Australian advisory appointment. No direct Collective Shout relationship with CAIS, ControlAI or the named Ban Deepfakes campaign was established in this bounded search. Non-discovery is not proof of absence. Collective Shout advocating restrictions on deepfakes is not, by itself, membership in that particular campaign.",
            "matched": [
              "NCOSE"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b28f398d2e31357fae07755a79f36908644aeb959f8b82119def2cea520682ba"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "Assessment",
            "text": "The strongest specific cross-network bridge is Collective Shout's joint payment letter with NCOSE. Separately, NCOSE and the Future of Life Institute signed a broad US AI-policy coalition letter. This supports two documented campaign overlaps, not a direct Collective Shout–FLI partnership, shared funding or common direction.",
            "matched": [
              "NCOSE"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fda29cddd3e6f13f9d45e650e1ac1a84a6465959b828736cfaccca0b7e3dabcf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
            "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
            "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
            "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "fli",
      "label": "Future of Life Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A nonprofit co-founded by physicist Max Tegmark that supports work on catastrophic risks and campaigns for limits on dangerous AI development.",
      "aliases": [
        "FLI",
        "Future of Life"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research, grants & AI advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/fli",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "fli",
        "name": "Future of Life Institute",
        "role": "Research, grants & AI advocacy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A nonprofit co-founded by physicist Max Tegmark that supports work on catastrophic risks and campaigns for limits on dangerous AI development.",
        "why": "Its finances show that AI-risk advocacy can draw on substantial institutional resources. Its creator support also connects grantmaking with public communication.",
        "about": [
          "FLI’s 2025 audited accounts report $45,197,838 in grants from Lightcone Foundation. This is an annual financial statement item, not a measured budget for influencing audiences.",
          "A creator in the investigation acknowledged FLI, Frame and BlueDot support while asserting editorial independence. Funding can increase the reach of people who already share a position; it does not by itself show that a donor wrote their script."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "FLI",
          "Future of Life"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 29
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A nonprofit co-founded by physicist Max Tegmark that supports work on catastrophic risks and campaigns for limits on dangerous AI development.",
        "structuralRole": "Large financial resources connected to AI-risk advocacy",
        "significance": "FLI links substantial institutional resources with research, policy advocacy and some creator support. Its related-foundation transactions, grant programmes and supported outputs answer different parts of the money trail and need to be read together.",
        "background": [
          "FLI’s 2025 audited accounts report $45,197,838 in grants from Lightcone Foundation. This is an annual financial statement item, not a measured budget for influencing audiences.",
          "A creator in the investigation acknowledged FLI, Frame and BlueDot support while asserting editorial independence. Funding can increase the reach of people who already share a position; it does not by itself show that a donor wrote their script."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Assets, grants and campaign spending are different parts of the trail",
            "text": "The financial records show resources moving in both directions between FLI and related bodies: a $162.59 million asset transfer from FLI to Lightcone Foundation in December 2022; a $21.05 million noncash contribution from Lightcone to FLI in 2024; and $45,197,838 in Lightcone grants reported in FLI’s 2025 accounts. These are dated asset and grant transactions. Adding them together as one independent pool of persuasion spending would count different financial events as though they were the same kind of expense.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form 990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Tallinn’s formal role",
            "text": "FLI identifies Tallinn as a co-founder and board member. Its transparency page distinguishes him from its general statement that donors do not influence policy because of that board role.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI: Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI financial transparency",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation Financial details: value: 45,197,838; currency: USD; kind: grant receipt; period: FY2025 What remains unestablished: Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-lightcone25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "related party grant received",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "FY2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement. Financial details: value: 163,034; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-due-baif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beneficial AI Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
            "sourceName": "Beneficial AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement. Financial details: value: 2,883; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-due-fli-action-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Action and Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Action and Research",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-output-fli"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Year end amount due under cost sharing. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied. Financial details: value: 959,308; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-flf-receivable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "year end amount due under cost sharing",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Year end amount due for consulting costs. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied. Financial details: value: 430,343; currency: USD; kind: payable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-flf-payable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "year end amount due for consulting costs",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$180,297,079 cash/financial assets; related-entity allocation, not independent persuasion spending. Financial details: value: 180,297,079; currency: USD; kind: asset transfer FMV; period: 2022-12-30",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e46"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$180.30m asset transfer",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "2022-12-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree What remains unestablished: Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-supporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "amended purpose supports",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "FY2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "Assessment",
            "text": "The strongest specific cross-network bridge is Collective Shout's joint payment letter with NCOSE. Separately, NCOSE and the Future of Life Institute signed a broad US AI-policy coalition letter. This supports two documented campaign overlaps, not a direct Collective Shout–FLI partnership, shared funding or common direction.",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fda29cddd3e6f13f9d45e650e1ac1a84a6465959b828736cfaccca0b7e3dabcf"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The September 15 Pro-Human Assembly now has a concrete institutional outcome: the Pro-Human AI Coalition. Project Liberty's launch statement identifies three organizational co-founders—Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact—and names Mila and Omidyar Network in its steering structure. The coalition is described as an independent nonprofit. Launch announcement .",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "06b8c7fea6d4e98a69126b09f14aee4e0ab3d2224eb94f479ee5165767ed0bae"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI: Future of Life Institute, EIN 47-1052538, Pennsylvania legal domicile, formed 2014, section 501(c)(3). The 2024 return reports five voting board members, two independent, 29 employees. It identifies Anthony N Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn and Viktoriya Krakovna as directors/officers. Current website presents the same five under current names/roles: Anthony Aguirre (President and CEO), Jaan Tallinn (director), Max Tegmark (Founder and Chair), Meia Chita-Tegmark (Board Secretary), Victoria Krakovna (director). These are different date states, not contradictory office labels. S1, S11.",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "47558c834c5f701982a3b99fae4428753eaad51bfd2313c425755e60cafebf2f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "The clearest declared division of labor comes from PauseAI Global's theory of change . It names MIRI, the Future of Life Institute, and ControlAI as organizations developing policy and expert consensus, while PauseAI builds public and political pressure. Its strategy includes coordinated national pressure, directing politicians toward policy partners, and rapid responses to AI incidents. Its organization rules locate campaign and communications coordination with executive and chapter leadership, with local adaptation. These are explicit organizational intentions, not evidence that donors direct every campaign. The theory of change rejects violence and dishonesty.",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fc890a9abae60b22fb82a600cd67cc49a4289c721f9178cdfffd3bdcaa6f7c7d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI current finance page",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
            "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Our people",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
          },
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly event recap",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/recap/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Recap | The Pro-Human Assembly, September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffsR2KrIS4k"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Future of Life Institute is a nonprofit working on catastrophic risks, especially those associated with advanced AI. Co-founded by Max Tegmark and Jaan Tallinn, it combines research, public advocacy, policy relationships and grants, supported by a substantial financial structure involving related foundations.",
          "structuralRole": "Combines scientific authority, philanthropic resources and policy advocacy",
          "significance": "FLI can sustain research, communication and policy work at institutional scale. Its place in the network comes from the combination of recognizable scientific voices, organizational relationships and resources that persist beyond a particular campaign.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "FLI works to reduce catastrophic risks and has become a prominent participant in arguments for limits on dangerous AI development. Max Tegmark is identified as founder and chair. Jaan Tallinn is a co-founder and board member. These roles connect the public standing of its advocates with an organization able to commission work, support projects and maintain relationships with policymakers.",
            "Its finances are substantial. FLI’s 2025 audited statements report $45,197,838 in grants from the related Lightcone Foundation. Earlier records describe a $162.59 million asset transfer from FLI to that foundation in December 2022 and a $21.05 million noncash contribution in the opposite direction in 2024. This is a structure for holding and using resources across related organizations, with shared governance and administration visible in the records.",
            "The public-facing work has several routes. FLI participates in policy initiatives and expert discussion, while creators in the investigation have acknowledged its support. The Future Tense creator named FLI, Frame and BlueDot as supporters of work while asserting editorial independence. PauseAI’s theory of change names FLI alongside MIRI and ControlAI as a counterpart in policy and expert-consensus work.",
            "The organization’s own transparency statement also helps locate authority: it distinguishes Tallinn’s board position when discussing donor influence. FLI is therefore worth reading as an institution with resources, officers and particular initiatives, as well as a familiar name attached to warnings. Its ability to keep research, policy and communication operating together is a major part of its significance here.",
            "The September 15 Pro-Human Assembly provides a current example of FLI’s convening role. Its own event pages identify FLI as presenter and place its officers in opening and closing sessions. The programme brings political, labor, faith and creator constituencies into a shared venue. The scheduled coalition announcements must still be checked against what happens, and the programme supplies no speaker-payment terms."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
              "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI 2022 Form 990",
              "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
              "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI current finance page",
              "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
            },
            {
              "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
              "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
            },
            {
              "title": "Pro-Human Assembly organizer homepage",
              "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Organizer programme",
              "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "collective-shout",
      "label": "Collective Shout",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An Australian campaign group whose July 2025 letter asked payment companies to stop processing payments for targeted game platforms.",
      "aliases": [
        "Steam",
        "games",
        "adult games"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Australian campaigning organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/collective-shout",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "collective-shout",
        "name": "Collective Shout",
        "role": "Australian campaigning organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "An Australian campaign group whose July 2025 letter asked payment companies to stop processing payments for targeted game platforms.",
        "why": "It illustrates a route to platform restrictions through commercial intermediaries: an advocacy demand can target the companies that make transactions possible.",
        "about": [
          "itch.io publicly attributed processor scrutiny and adult-content deindexing to the campaign. That account provides a specific claim about the sequence. The private processor correspondence and identities behind every banking instruction were not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Steam",
          "games",
          "adult games"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
            "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An Australian campaign group whose July 2025 letter asked payment companies to stop processing payments for targeted game platforms.",
        "structuralRole": "Advocacy directed at commercial intermediaries",
        "significance": "Collective Shout’s relevance is its attempt to change what platforms distribute by pressing organisations with commercial influence over them. The investigation follows the campaign, the intermediaries’ responses and the platform outcome as separate steps.",
        "background": [
          "itch.io publicly attributed processor scrutiny and adult-content deindexing to the campaign. That account provides a specific claim about the sequence. The private processor correspondence and identities behind every banking instruction were not obtained."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "New evidence and its limits",
            "text": "Australian public company and registered charity with distinct disclosed leadership. This pass establishes no Civic Shout relationship; similar names are insufficient.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: team roster",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: Australian Business Register",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "November 2024 submission pp13–14 proposes that relevant services admitting under-18s scan all Australian users' messages and remove specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material. This is the organisation's affirmative answer; proposal only, not enactment or actual deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e41"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
                "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "All-user message scanning proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocated message scanning in its submission",
            "sourceName": "Collective Shout",
            "targetName": "All-user message scanning proposal",
            "date": "2024-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Collective Shout published the 10 July letter requesting payment-company leadership stop processing for the targeted game platforms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e4"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Organised open letter",
            "sourceName": "Collective Shout",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Trial roster identifies Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e8"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Movement Director",
            "sourceName": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "targetName": "Collective Shout",
            "date": "2024–25 trial roster"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout",
            "text": "This bounded pass found no shared legal entity, named leader, contract, payer or campaign partnership between Civic Shout and Collective Shout . That is a scoped negative result, not proof of universal independence. Do not create a relationship edge from the similar names. The actual newly listed AI participant links to Action Collective , a separate progressive-action newsletter; that site's public archive does not establish its ultimate ownership.",
            "matched": [
              "Collective Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "82274b86abe5d3aa9b86e73db5ed6ee0893c891e732f0b614275cae115e1fbae"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout",
            "text": "The Australian Business Register identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED , ABN/ACN 30 162 159 097 / 162 159 097, an Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Its team names Melinda Tankard Reist, Caitlin Roper, Renee Chopping, Lyn Swanson Kennedy, Coralie Alison and Bernie Poljak. These differ from the Civic Shout leaders identified above. Its FAQ describes a charity limited by guarantee with no affiliation to religious or political institutions; that last statement is its own representation.",
            "matched": [
              "Collective Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b6cc0a4c4ee841ce2e7a6026f6f3bc79d4894ff0a6ae1ef4ca5e76024c3fa7a5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "Assessment",
            "text": "The strongest specific cross-network bridge is Collective Shout's joint payment letter with NCOSE. Separately, NCOSE and the Future of Life Institute signed a broad US AI-policy coalition letter. This supports two documented campaign overlaps, not a direct Collective Shout–FLI partnership, shared funding or common direction.",
            "matched": [
              "Collective Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fda29cddd3e6f13f9d45e650e1ac1a84a6465959b828736cfaccca0b7e3dabcf"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "1. Charity classification: correction to the supplied material",
            "text": "The official ABR identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED, ABN 30 162 159 097 / ACN 162 159 097, as an Australian Public Company, with charity registration from 31 January 2013 and entity-level DGR endorsement from 1 January 2024. The page's record-extraction date is 17 August 2026. DGR status by itself does not establish PBI status. ABR record , read.",
            "matched": [
              "Collective Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6ce5234306731fbc3710361984311d07c637b3b6cd2f61804ae41517e1d25c14"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
            "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
          },
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: team roster",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: Australian Business Register",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Collective Shout is an Australian advocacy organization that campaigns against the sexual exploitation and objectification of women and girls. Its July 2025 payment-company campaign sought to pressure game platforms through their financial intermediaries, and it has advocated broad online-message scanning in Australian consultations.",
          "structuralRole": "Advocacy using payment access and safety-policy consultation",
          "significance": "Collective Shout is a useful example of a campaign targeting the companies a platform depends on. Its letters and consultation proposals show the specific changes it seeks, including financial exclusion and scanning requirements, rather than leaving its influence at the level of branding.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Collective Shout is an Australian campaigning organization with a registered public-company and charity identity. Its leadership includes Movement Director Melinda Tankard Reist. In this investigation it is most significant for choosing intermediaries as a pressure point: persuading payment businesses to act can change a platform's available choices before any legislature passes a new prohibition.",
            "On 10 July 2025 the organization published an open letter asking payment-company leaders to stop processing payments for targeted game platforms. The campaign's demand was directed at financial support for distribution. itch.io later attributed processor scrutiny and adult-content deindexing to the campaign. That platform account supplies a concrete sequence connecting advocacy, financial relationships and changes experienced by creators and customers.",
            "Collective Shout also sought more extensive content controls through Australia's consultation process. Its November 2024 online-safety-codes submission proposed that relevant services admitting under-eighteens scan the messages of all Australian users and remove specified classes of material, including categories lawful for adults. This was an affirmative policy demand. Its scope is broader than a complaint about a particular game and shows what the group would like safety obligations to require from service operators.",
            "Tankard Reist's appearance on the Australian age-assurance trial's stakeholder advisory board adds another route into policy discussion. Taken together, the records show an organization working through public campaigning, consultation and advisory access. Its power comes from making a case that institutions with greater practical leverage should act. The payment-company response and the eventual regulatory decision are the next steps to follow when assessing how far that pressure changes the world."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
              "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
            },
            {
              "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
              "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
            },
            {
              "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
              "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Collective Shout: team roster",
              "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team"
            },
            {
              "title": "Collective Shout: Australian Business Register",
              "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "payment-campaign",
      "label": "July 2025 payment campaign",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Open letter requested payment companies stop processing for targeted game platforms.",
      "aliases": [
        "Payment letter · 2025"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/payment-campaign",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "payment-campaign",
        "name": "July 2025 payment campaign",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Open letter requested payment companies stop processing for targeted game platforms.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Open letter requested payment companies stop processing for targeted game platforms."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Payment letter · 2025"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The July 2025 payment campaign was an open-letter effort organised by Collective Shout asking payment-company leaders to stop processing transactions for targeted game platforms. The letter dated 10 July named Steam and itch.io and was signed by advocates including NCOSE's Haley McNamara, Melinda Tankard Reist and Jon Rouse.",
        "structuralRole": "Public pressure campaign targeting the payment dependencies of game distribution",
        "significance": "The campaign sought to change what platforms host by acting on an upstream commercial dependency: payment acceptance. That mechanism can create pressure beyond a direct request to remove a game. The letter itself was advocacy, while platform responses and any private processor instructions are separate stages in the causal chain.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A request followed by an attributed platform response",
            "text": "The letter addressed PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. On 24 July, itch.io attributed processor scrutiny and broad adult-content deindexing to the campaign, explaining the need to protect payment access. Mastercard subsequently denied directly requiring game restrictions. The retained record therefore contains a public demand, signatory support and an affected platform's account of consequences, but not the underlying private notices that would settle who instructed which intermediary to take which action.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e4",
              "e5",
              "e6",
              "e7",
              "e9",
              "e10",
              "e11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Steam was named among platforms for which the letter sought withdrawal of payment processing; Steam internal decision records were not reviewed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steam",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Targeted platform",
            "sourceName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "targetName": "Steam",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Letter addressed PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. It was a pressure campaign and request, not a legally binding order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e9"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Payment-letter addressees",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Requested processing withdrawal",
            "sourceName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "targetName": "Payment-letter addressees",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Collective Shout published the 10 July letter requesting payment-company leadership stop processing for the targeted game platforms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e4"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collective Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Organised open letter",
            "sourceName": "Collective Shout",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Jon Rouse signed the open letter in his professional identification. No financial or legal authority relationship is stated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e6"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jon Rouse",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signatory",
            "sourceName": "Jon Rouse",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Haley McNamara signed for NCOSE. Public campaign endorsement; no transfer of funds or directing authority established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e5"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCOSE",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signed through Haley McNamara",
            "sourceName": "NCOSE",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Melinda Tankard Reist signed the payment-company letter for Collective Shout.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e7"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Signed for Collective Shout",
            "sourceName": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "itch.io attributed processor scrutiny and its broad adult-content deindexing to the campaign. Underlying private processor instructions were not obtained; Mastercard denied directly requiring game restrictions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Platform reported campaign effects",
            "sourceName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "targetName": "itch.io",
            "date": "2025-07-24 to 2025-08-01"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "payment-processors",
      "label": "Payment-letter addressees",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Collection: PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. Letter recipients, not a single legal entity or operational controller.",
      "aliases": [
        "Letter addressees"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/payment-processors",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "payment-processors",
        "name": "Payment-letter addressees",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Collection: PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. Letter recipients, not a single legal entity or operational controller.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Collection: PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. Letter recipients, not a single legal entity or operational controller."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Letter addressees"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Collection: PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. Letter recipients, not a single legal entity or operational controller.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Letter addressed PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. It was a pressure campaign and request, not a legally binding order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e9"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Requested processing withdrawal",
            "sourceName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "targetName": "Payment-letter addressees",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
            "heading": "What is new",
            "text": "This permits a Steam-specific attributed chain without importing Stripe's itch role. The processors remain unnamed. The existing graph node “Payment-letter addressees” is not their identity. Mastercard's denial and the June 3, 2025 rulebook remain separate retained records. The apparent disagreement could concern who communicated, what was requested, or downstream interpretation of a broad rule; it cannot be resolved by treating either public statement as the missing instruction.",
            "matched": [
              "Payment-letter addressees",
              "Letter addressees"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dd270ddec0395335607f4a1ace9abee8bbf70e8023636b9706368b20dc6789f7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "itch-io",
      "label": "itch.io",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A platform for independent games that removed adult content from discovery during a 2025 dispute involving payment providers.",
      "aliases": [
        "itch",
        "gaming",
        "Steam"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Independent games marketplace"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/itch-io",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "itch-io",
        "name": "itch.io",
        "role": "Independent games marketplace",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "A platform for independent games that removed adult content from discovery during a 2025 dispute involving payment providers.",
        "why": "It is a concrete example of a platform changing access because its ability to receive payments is under pressure.",
        "about": [
          "The platform’s public explanations identify payment-company concerns and attribute the pressure to Collective Shout’s campaign. Its account also relays restrictions from Stripe’s banking partners. The underlying bank instruction was not obtained, leaving the named source of that instruction unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "itch",
          "gaming",
          "Steam"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
            "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
            "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A platform for independent games that removed adult content from discovery during a 2025 dispute involving payment providers.",
        "structuralRole": "A platform exposed to payment-provider restrictions",
        "significance": "itch.io shows how a platform’s distribution choices can be constrained by its payment relationships. Its account of restrictions is evidence of a downstream practical effect; the separate provider records help establish which organisation made which decision.",
        "background": [
          "The platform’s public explanations identify payment-company concerns and attribute the pressure to Collective Shout’s campaign. Its account also relays restrictions from Stripe’s banking partners. The underlying bank instruction was not obtained, leaving the named source of that instruction unresolved."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The current notice names risk/review costs and moves affected sellers away from collected payouts, with final-balance and payment-disablement conditions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
                "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes disqualification and final-payout transition terms",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
            "date": "Current undated text inspected September 8, 2026; linked from April 2023 post, but intervening version history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The July 31 update required disabling payments for the described free-content reindexing. Current post has edits; original snapshot not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n40"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Free NSFW reindexing",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "No Payments condition published",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "Free NSFW reindexing",
            "date": "2025-07-31 published update"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Documents the announcement of exploration. No provider selection, contract, deployment or link to the payment restriction was established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-id-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch proposed digital-ID partnerships · July 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced exploration of unnamed third-party digital-ID providers",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch proposed digital-ID partnerships · July 2025",
            "date": "Proposal announced in July 27, 2025 post; current edited text and July 29 derivative excerpt."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "itch.io attributed processor scrutiny and its broad adult-content deindexing to the campaign. Underlying private processor instructions were not obtained; Mastercard denied directly requiring game restrictions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Platform reported campaign effects",
            "sourceName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "targetName": "itch.io",
            "date": "2025-07-24 to 2025-08-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "In April 2023, itch's admin said selected sellers had been told to leave collected payouts while distinguishing this from a global policy change.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
                "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described selected account exclusions from collected payouts",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
            "date": "Public admin statement April 26, 2023; do not imply all current template wording existed then."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Itch attributed UK page restrictions to OSA compliance, while preserving existing purchase downloads and offering a dashboard appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-geoblocking"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch UK geographic restrictions · July 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced tag-based geographic blocks with manual review and appeals",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch UK geographic restrictions · July 2025",
            "date": "Statement created July 27, 2025; describes July 25 regulatory onset; current post has five edits."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "itch identifies Stripe as its card processor and reports a sexual-gratification content definition and payment suspension.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n38"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              },
              {
                "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Adult-content payment restriction reported",
            "sourceName": "Stripe",
            "targetName": "itch.io",
            "date": "July 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "itch explains why losing PayPal would threaten payouts across its platform. This is not a recovered PayPal takedown order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n39"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Platform payout dependency reported",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "itch.io",
            "date": "2025-07-28 addendum"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "Assessment",
            "text": "There is a documented mechanism linking Collective Shout's campaigning to payment-provider pressure and restrictions by itch.io. There is also a documented personnel bridge into the stakeholder advisory board of Australia's government-commissioned age-assurance technology trial. These are separate, supported influence channels. The evidence does not establish that the payment campaign secured the advisory appointment, that the advisory board exercised regulatory power, or that an AI NGO directed either channel.",
            "matched": [
              "itch.io"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5bfae8e49f1d9e686ec2bac1f5eed1e51768123b8f1d0d61c368f4fafc9b21f5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "2. Payment pressure and a documented platform response",
            "text": "On 24 July 2025 itch.io said it had deindexed all adult NSFW content after processor scrutiny associated with Collective Shout's campaign. It described protecting payment access as operationally essential. Its 28 July addendum names Stripe and PayPal as current processors, explains why the platform's response was broad, and discusses stricter age-gating. This is a primary account by the affected platform, although the underlying processor communications were not obtained. itch.io announcement and addendum , read.",
            "matched": [
              "itch.io"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ee16789dffcdc0ad5d3d7b2b8665e5cb0eff075c98c2ec2af238728aa8fc1d7d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
            "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
            "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "steam",
      "label": "Steam",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Valve’s PC gaming storefront and platform. It became a target of the July 2025 payment campaign and publicly described removing games to preserve access to payment methods.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Platform"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/steam",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "steam",
        "name": "Steam",
        "role": "Platform",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Valve’s PC gaming storefront and platform. It became a target of the July 2025 payment campaign and publicly described removing games to preserve access to payment methods.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Valve’s statements, published by the journalists who received them, describe objections passed through processors or acquiring banks. Valve says it proposed keeping lawful content and that this response was rejected.",
          "The research traces those reported decisions while leaving the original bank instructions and identities of the relevant acquiring banks unresolved. Mastercard separately denied requiring the game restrictions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
          "stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Steam is Valve's PC game storefront and distribution platform. It was targeted by the July 2025 payment campaign and publicly described withdrawing affected games to preserve access to payment methods used across the store. Its case exposes a commercial dependency between catalogue decisions and payments.",
        "structuralRole": "Game-distribution platform making content decisions under reported processor pressure",
        "significance": "Valve's account shows how objections transmitted through payment infrastructure can affect legal-content choices by a platform. The relevant chain runs through processors and acquiring banks, with the storefront making the retirement decision. The unresolved communications matter for determining which organisation originated the demand and how others interpreted it.",
        "background": [
          "Valve’s statements, published by the journalists who received them, describe objections passed through processors or acquiring banks. Valve says it proposed keeping lawful content and that this response was rejected.",
          "The research traces those reported decisions while leaving the original bank instructions and identities of the relevant acquiring banks unresolved. Mastercard separately denied requiring the game restrictions."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Valve's account of the decision",
            "text": "In statements supplied to a journalist, Valve said it retired affected games and notified developers, offering application credits for future titles, to avoid losing payment methods for other purchases. A later statement published on 1 August 2025 says processors rejected a legal-content-only response and cited Mastercard Rule 5.12.7 concerning brand risk. These are attributed company statements rather than recovered processor notices or Steam decision minutes. The original network messages, counterpart identities and exact individual game-decision dates remain unestablished.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              },
              {
                "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e10",
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection",
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
              "stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Steam was named among platforms for which the letter sought withdrawal of payment processing; Steam internal decision records were not reviewed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Targeted platform",
            "sourceName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "targetName": "Steam",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Valve said it withdrew affected games and notified developers, offering app credits for future titles, to avoid losing methods used for other purchases.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steam July 2025 game retirements",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "said it retired games to preserve payment methods",
            "sourceName": "Steam",
            "targetName": "Steam July 2025 game retirements",
            "date": "Retirements reported by Valve July 17, 2025; individual game decision dates not reconstructed."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Valve told the recipient journalist that its processors rejected a legal-content-only response and cited Mastercard's brand-risk rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steam payment processors · unidentified",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly cited Rule 5.12.7 after rejecting Valve's response",
            "sourceName": "Steam payment processors · unidentified",
            "targetName": "Steam",
            "date": "Valve statement August 1, 2025; upstream notice date not specified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09",
            "title": "Stablecoin, payment and California discussion check",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The examined instruments do not establish the proposed wider bank-owner/BlackRock/Cayman/WEF/medical-data instruction chain or a shared origin for Steam lawsuits. These remain unestablished connections in this bounded check, not a finding that no such connection could exist. No political policy preference or recommendation is made.",
            "matched": [
              "Steam"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "96d634b53f52f888d07f241cc4fb549fb677e46748fcb6a48a62dd379642e6c8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
            "heading": "The records still held elsewhere",
            "text": "The Steam joint is Valve's processor notice and response, the corresponding Mastercard/acquirer message and the actual counterparty identities. Valve payments/legal and its processor counterparts should hold operational communications; Valve press and GamingOnLinux hold the identified company replies. The published replies establish an attributed account, not the contents of unrecovered upstream records.",
            "matched": [
              "Steam"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b90197939235fcce5935852deb11de2bcf2fda1af1acd70a52bbbd45ad416f8b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest new addition is Steam's own attributed notice chain. Valve supplied statements to the journalist who published them, including a rejected alternative and the precise Mastercard rule reportedly invoked. Separately, original itch records expose an earlier platform payout decision and a contemporaneous UK geographic-compliance decision. The bank behind itch's July 2025 restriction remains unidentified.",
            "matched": [
              "Steam"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "541869e3b1118b36635503e46aaff354423981dd323a9b88f45d40dd3ddd5856"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
            "title": "Response/outcome search: 22 August 2025 NAAG deepfake-NCII letters",
            "heading": "False-positive and chronology boundaries",
            "text": "Civitai/Pornhub interventions cited as precedents in the letters must stay antecedent examples. This pass did not freshly investigate their events or infer they were caused by the later letters. Steam/adult-game restrictions, separate AI-company letters, xAI actions, vaping and other branches were excluded. Search results about those subjects were discovery noise, not accepted evidence. Company measures or legislative activity that predate22August2025 cannot be counted as responses merely because search returned them; no complete policy-version history was reconstructed.",
            "matched": [
              "Steam"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "115665b1eca140c5b153d9da0bddb2ad87c622a3ad9871d60a428710641d2b93"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          },
          {
            "id": "stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09",
            "title": "Stablecoin, payment and California discussion check"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-moratorium-letter",
      "label": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Shared letter/artifact. This map represents only selected signatories, not the full set of more than 140. A letter is not a directing organisation.",
      "aliases": [
        "AI coalition letter"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ai-moratorium-letter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ai-moratorium-letter",
        "name": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Shared letter/artifact. This map represents only selected signatories, not the full set of more than 140. A letter is not a directing organisation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Shared letter/artifact. This map represents only selected signatories, not the full set of more than 140. A letter is not a directing organisation."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "AI coalition letter"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Shared letter/artifact. This map represents only selected signatories, not the full set of more than 140. A letter is not a directing organisation.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "NCOSE appears among more than 140 organisations opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation. A bounded joint advocacy act, not a general alliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCOSE",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signatory",
            "sourceName": "NCOSE",
            "targetName": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
            "date": "2025-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FLI is named on the same broad coalition letter as NCOSE. This does not establish FLI participation in the later July gaming-payment campaign.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signatory",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
            "date": "2025-06-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rouse",
      "label": "Jon Rouse",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Payment-letter signatory and chair of the completed Australian trial's stakeholder advisory board.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/rouse",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "rouse",
        "name": "Jon Rouse",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Payment-letter signatory and chair of the completed Australian trial's stakeholder advisory board.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Payment-letter signatory and chair of the completed Australian trial's stakeholder advisory board."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Jon Rouse is identified as chair of the completed Australian Age Assurance Technology Trial's stakeholder advisory board and as a signatory to the July 2025 payment-company open letter. The trial's own account assigns him the role of appointing stakeholder-board members.",
        "structuralRole": "Named appointment-channel actor linking trial advice and public payment advocacy",
        "significance": "His position makes the advisory overlap more specific than two organisations merely appearing on the same list. A chair who appoints participants can shape which perspectives enter an advisory forum. That role still needs distinction from the trial contractor's decisions, a regulator's powers and the payment companies' commercial actions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A documented overlap, bounded authority",
            "text": "The trial page says Rouse chaired the board and appointed its members, including Collective Shout's Melinda Tankard Reist. The roster also included industry and digital-rights participants. Rouse separately signed the 10 July 2025 letter under his professional identification, endorsing a request to payment-company leadership. The retained records do not establish individual appointment dates, compensation, a financial relationship to the campaign or authority to compel a payment restriction. They establish an appointment role and a joint advocacy act.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e6",
              "e19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operator's published description says the chair Jon Rouse appointed members. Exact individual appointment dates and compensation were not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chair / member appointment role",
            "sourceName": "Jon Rouse",
            "targetName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Jon Rouse signed the open letter in his professional identification. No financial or legal authority relationship is stated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e6"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-signatory",
            "sourceName": "Jon Rouse",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "3. Advisory access: identify who appointed whom",
            "text": "The trial's own stakeholder-board page lists Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director. It says Professor Jon Rouse chairs the board and appointed its members. Rouse is also a signatory to the July payment letter above. This is a concrete overlap between campaign cooperation and the trial's appointment channel. The page also lists industry and digital-rights participants; the board cannot fairly be represented as solely Collective Shout's vehicle. Trial board roster and appointment description , read; individual trial biography , read.",
            "matched": [
              "Jon Rouse",
              "Rouse"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "700b18c6a6b95903a2587e9c20c87a789b134c533fedbdf1489b6a8ebbf194df"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "tankard-reist",
      "label": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Collective Shout Movement Director; payment-letter signatory and trial stakeholder adviser.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/tankard-reist",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "tankard-reist",
        "name": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Collective Shout Movement Director; payment-letter signatory and trial stakeholder adviser.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Collective Shout Movement Director; payment-letter signatory and trial stakeholder adviser."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Melinda Tankard Reist is identified by the Australian Age Assurance Technology Trial as Collective Shout's Movement Director and a stakeholder adviser. She also signed the July 2025 open letter asking payment companies to withdraw processing from targeted game platforms on behalf of Collective Shout.",
        "structuralRole": "Advocate connecting a payment-pressure campaign with trial stakeholder advice",
        "significance": "Her two roles provide a concrete bridge between campaigning and an official trial's advisory environment. The overlap matters because advisory participation can bring an advocate's perspective into technical-policy discussion. It does not establish regulatory authority or show that the payment campaign caused her appointment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The appointment channel has a named chair",
            "text": "The trial's stakeholder-board page lists Tankard Reist and says chair Jon Rouse appointed members. Rouse also signed the payment letter, making the campaign and appointment overlap explicit. The board additionally included industry and digital-rights participants, so it cannot fairly be represented as a vehicle belonging solely to Collective Shout. The retained sources do not give her individual appointment date, compensation, formal veto or a recorded influence on a particular trial finding.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e7",
              "e8",
              "e20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operator lists Tankard Reist as a board member. Appointment does not establish regulatory powers or that the payment campaign caused selection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed stakeholder adviser",
            "sourceName": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "targetName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Trial roster identifies Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e8"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collective Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Movement Director",
            "sourceName": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "targetName": "Collective Shout",
            "date": "2024–25 trial roster"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Melinda Tankard Reist signed the payment-company letter for Collective Shout.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e7"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
                "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Signed for Collective Shout",
            "sourceName": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "targetName": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "date": "2025-07-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout",
            "text": "The Australian Business Register identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED , ABN/ACN 30 162 159 097 / 162 159 097, an Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Its team names Melinda Tankard Reist, Caitlin Roper, Renee Chopping, Lyn Swanson Kennedy, Coralie Alison and Bernie Poljak. These differ from the Civic Shout leaders identified above. Its FAQ describes a charity limited by guarantee with no affiliation to religious or political institutions; that last statement is its own representation.",
            "matched": [
              "Melinda Tankard Reist",
              "Reist"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b6cc0a4c4ee841ce2e7a6026f6f3bc79d4894ff0a6ae1ef4ca5e76024c3fa7a5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "2. Payment pressure and a documented platform response",
            "text": "Collective Shout's open letter is dated 10 July 2025 and posted 11 July. It asks PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership to stop processing transactions for Steam, itch.io and comparable platforms hosting the content it criticises. Signatories include Melinda Tankard Reist for Collective Shout; Haley McNamara, then NCOSE's Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Programs; and Professor Jon Rouse. These are public campaign endorsements, with no financial transfer or authority relationship stated. Original letter , read, including signatory list. The site's footer describes Collective Shout as a company limited by guarantee; its self-description is not substituted for the official registry.",
            "matched": [
              "Melinda Tankard Reist",
              "Reist"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "928c0b868b0b5f1951810c16584adcd6e2fe4ac86434af0c04ce46fb79edb3c6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "3. Advisory access: identify who appointed whom",
            "text": "The trial's own stakeholder-board page lists Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director. It says Professor Jon Rouse chairs the board and appointed its members. Rouse is also a signatory to the July payment letter above. This is a concrete overlap between campaign cooperation and the trial's appointment channel. The page also lists industry and digital-rights participants; the board cannot fairly be represented as solely Collective Shout's vehicle. Trial board roster and appointment description , read; individual trial biography , read.",
            "matched": [
              "Reist"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "700b18c6a6b95903a2587e9c20c87a789b134c533fedbdf1489b6a8ebbf194df"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "Australian age-assurance trial",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [
        "Australia age trial"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/au-age-trial",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "au-age-trial",
        "name": "Australian age-assurance trial",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
          "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Australia age trial"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australia's Age Assurance Technology Trial was a government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study led by an ACCS consortium. The department published its final report on 31 August 2025. Its conflict register, advisory-board minutes and final liaison account document both the study process and contemporaneous challenges.",
        "structuralRole": "Commissioned evidence production connecting vendors, government and stakeholder scrutiny",
        "significance": "The trial is a bridge between a policy commitment and claims about what technology can deliver. Its value depends on recruitment, testing and review arrangements, making objections and responses part of the substantive history. A published report establishes delivery of the study, rather than deployment of every tested approach.",
        "background": [
          "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How the process was challenged",
            "text": "The consortium disclosed commercial testing and certification work while allowing participation beyond its clients. DIGI's April 2025 letter raised design, recruitment and competing-role concerns. April minutes say Scout would recruit mystery shoppers from its registered panel, excluding employees and their children. July minutes describe the advisory board receiving parts A/B/K while vendors received their own extracts during legal review. The final report says methods were revised, but the retained record does not reconcile every before-and-after version.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e16",
              "e17",
              "e28",
              "w1-australia-edge-scout-recruitment",
              "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access",
              "w1-australia-edge-responses-reported"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DIGI's 16 April 2025 letter in official FOI25-409 pp10–13 raises design, recruitment, competing-role and pre-existing regulatory commitment concerns. These are representations of an interested industry body, not adjudicated defects.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e28"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIGI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Raised contemporaneous objections",
            "sourceName": "DIGI",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2025-04-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ACCS-led consortium delivered the government-commissioned trial. ACCS declared commercial testing/certification services to age-assurance firms; participation was open beyond its clients.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Consortium lead",
            "sourceName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Work-package 3 lead through SafetyTech Ltd. Register excludes him from testing age-assurance systems and from euCONSENT's submission process; no failure of those safeguards established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e21"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Iain Corby",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Stakeholder-engagement lead",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stakeholder advisory board supported the trial. It was not a statutory regulator and no ongoing 2026 mandate is inferred from the live roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Stakeholder advice",
            "sourceName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government commissioned the contractor-run trial and published its completed final report on 31 August 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissioned / published study",
            "sourceName": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March minutes preserve substantive challenge and assigned follow-up actions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-march-objections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded objections on sampling, safeguarding and circumvention",
            "sourceName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "Cover March13; meeting-header February date conflicts with DIGI's March14 reference. Exact event day unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "April29 clarification excludes employees/their children. It does not establish whether the plan changed or earlier description was wrong. Later April minutes state Scout would use its registered panel, not employees/their children; March–July minutes record responses. This remains an attributed objection, not the established achieved sample.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-scout-recruitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scout Insights",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "said mystery shoppers would come from its registered panel",
            "sourceName": "Scout Insights",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "Statement April29,2025, before reported fieldwork commencement."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SAB had A/B/K while vendors had their own extracts; identified review windows need draft/redline reconciliation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported withholding detailed vendor sections during legal review",
            "sourceName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "targetName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "date": "Access described July8,2025; vendor responses requested by July18."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "au-infrastructure",
      "label": "Australian infrastructure department",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Commissioned the trial and published its final report; historical departmental title abbreviated.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/au-infrastructure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "au-infrastructure",
        "name": "Australian infrastructure department",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Commissioned the trial and published its final report; historical departmental title abbreviated.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Commissioned the trial and published its final report; historical departmental title abbreviated."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Australian infrastructure department is the government commissioner and publisher of the 2024–25 age-assurance trial in these records. The abbreviated name refers to the relevant departmental role at the time, including procurement of technical-trial and separate consumer-research work.",
        "structuralRole": "Public buyer defining and financing the evidence-gathering programme",
        "significance": "The department connects policy needs with contracted research capacity. Distinguishing its separate purchases makes clear that technical assessment and consumer research were different work streams with different values, while publication of the final report establishes a delivered public output rather than proof of every payment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Procurement and publication",
            "text": "A departmental briefing identifies the ACCS trial award of 8 November 2024, contract CN4111198, at A$3,830,277; the inspected briefing does not settle its tax basis. A separate order executed on 28 August 2024 records A$278,293.40 including GST for Social Research Centre consumer research. Both are procurement values. The department published the trial's completed final report on 31 August 2025.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e15",
              "e17",
              "e29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Departmental tender announcement and original September24,2025 briefing identify ACCS's November8,2024 award CN4111198 at A$3,830,277. This is contract value, not payments received; complete contract and tax schedule unrecovered. Financial details: value: 3,830,277; currency: AUD; kind: contract value; period: Awarded November8,2024; June30,2025 end appears in indexed register; tax basis: Not specified in inspected briefing; GST-inclusive header only indexed in FOI26-176",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Awarded trial procurement",
            "sourceName": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "targetName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "date": "2024-11-15 announcement"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FOI25-409 PDF p32 records an order executed 28 August 2024 for consumer research, A$278,293.40 including GST. Contract/order value, not proof all cash was received.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Social Research Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "A$278,293.40 consumer research order",
            "sourceName": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "targetName": "Social Research Centre",
            "date": "2024-08-28"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government commissioned the contractor-run trial and published its completed final report on 31 August 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissioned / published study",
            "sourceName": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "accs",
      "label": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Earlier case records used ACCS for the trial consortium and certification brand. Exact legal persons now have separate nodes: AVID Certification Services Limited (14865982) and Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd (11493870). Historical claims keep their original counterpart scope; they are not silently reassigned.",
      "aliases": [
        "ACCS · umbrella"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/accs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "accs",
        "name": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Earlier case records used ACCS for the trial consortium and certification brand. Exact legal persons now have separate nodes: AVID Certification Services Limited (14865982) and Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd (11493870). Historical claims keep their original counterpart scope; they are not silently reassigned.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Earlier case records used ACCS for the trial consortium and certification brand. Exact legal persons now have separate nodes: AVID Certification Services Limited (14865982) and Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd (11493870). Historical claims keep their original counterpart scope; they are not silently reassigned."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ACCS · umbrella"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ACCS is the historical brand and scheme umbrella used in records of Australia's government-commissioned Age Assurance Technology Trial and related certification work. The case separately identifies AVID Certification Services Limited and Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd as legal persons; earlier brand-level statements should not automatically be reassigned between them.",
        "structuralRole": "Trial-consortium and certification identity linking government testing with a commercial assurance market",
        "significance": "The ACCS connection brings procurement, technical trial delivery and certification advocacy together. Commercial testing experience can supply trial capacity while creating relationships with firms whose products are assessed. The retained conflict register makes that overlap explicit, rather than implying every trial participant was an existing client.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Award, delivery and later policy citation",
            "text": "A departmental briefing identifies the 8 November 2024 award CN4111198 at A$3,830,277, announced on 15 November. This is contract value, not payments received; the complete contract and tax schedule were not acquired. The ACCS-led consortium delivered the 2024–25 trial and disclosed commercial testing and certification services to age-assurance firms, with participation open beyond its clients. A later 5Rights consultation response cited ACCS technical requirements as an example while recommending that Ofcom consider certification. That is a policy citation, not a new procurement or certification mandate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e15",
              "e16",
              "e26",
              "w7-adv-e-accs-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Departmental tender announcement and original September24,2025 briefing identify ACCS's November8,2024 award CN4111198 at A$3,830,277. This is contract value, not payments received; complete contract and tax schedule unrecovered. Financial details: value: 3,830,277; currency: AUD; kind: contract value; period: Awarded November8,2024; June30,2025 end appears in indexed register; tax basis: Not specified in inspected briefing; GST-inclusive header only indexed in FOI26-176",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Awarded trial procurement",
            "sourceName": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "targetName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "date": "2024-11-15 announcement"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The 5Rights response cited ACCS's 2021 Technical Requirements for Age Check Systems while recommending Ofcom consider certification. It also cited certification against a 5Rights-led standard.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-accs-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cited technical requirements as certification example",
            "sourceName": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
            "targetName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "date": "Document labelled October 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ACCS-led consortium delivered the government-commissioned trial. ACCS declared commercial testing/certification services to age-assurance firms; participation was open beyond its clients.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
              },
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Consortium lead",
            "sourceName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project DefAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Project delivery",
            "sourceName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "trial-board",
      "label": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [
        "Trial advisory board"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advisory body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/trial-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "trial-board",
        "name": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
        "role": "Advisory body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
          "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Trial advisory board"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          },
          {
            "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The stakeholder advisory board supported Australia's contractor-run 2024–25 age-assurance trial. The operator identifies Jon Rouse as chair with a role in appointing members, including listed adviser Melinda Tankard Reist. It was an advisory body for the trial, rather than a statutory regulator.",
        "structuralRole": "Stakeholder challenge and feedback channel within commissioned technical research",
        "significance": "The board's significance lies in the questions it raised and the information it could inspect. Minutes provide evidence of substantive challenge, while the later distribution of draft sections defines a practical limit on that scrutiny. A roster alone would reveal much less about how the process worked.",
        "background": [
          "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Challenge and access",
            "text": "March minutes record concerns about sampling, safeguarding and circumvention, with follow-up actions. Their cover and internal meeting dates conflict, so the precise March event day remains unresolved. July minutes say the board had draft parts A/B/K while vendors received their own extracts and detailed vendor material remained under legal review. Those records do not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate or that every proposed follow-up was completed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e18",
              "e19",
              "e20",
              "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
              "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operator's published description says the chair Jon Rouse appointed members. Exact individual appointment dates and compensation were not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jon Rouse",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chair / member appointment role",
            "sourceName": "Jon Rouse",
            "targetName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operator lists Tankard Reist as a board member. Appointment does not establish regulatory powers or that the payment campaign caused selection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed stakeholder adviser",
            "sourceName": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "targetName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stakeholder advisory board supported the trial. It was not a statutory regulator and no ongoing 2026 mandate is inferred from the live roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Stakeholder advice",
            "sourceName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March minutes preserve substantive challenge and assigned follow-up actions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-march-objections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded objections on sampling, safeguarding and circumvention",
            "sourceName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "Cover March13; meeting-header February date conflicts with DIGI's March14 reference. Exact event day unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SAB had A/B/K while vendors had their own extracts; identified review windows need draft/redline reconciliation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported withholding detailed vendor sections during legal review",
            "sourceName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "targetName": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "date": "Access described July8,2025; vendor responses requested by July18."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          },
          {
            "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "corby",
      "label": "Iain Corby",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Trial stakeholder-engagement lead through SafetyTech Ltd; AVPA roles and euCONSENT role disclosed with mitigations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/corby",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "corby",
        "name": "Iain Corby",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Trial stakeholder-engagement lead through SafetyTech Ltd; AVPA roles and euCONSENT role disclosed with mitigations.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Trial stakeholder-engagement lead through SafetyTech Ltd; AVPA roles and euCONSENT role disclosed with mitigations."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Iain Corby led stakeholder engagement for the Australian age-assurance trial through SafetyTech Ltd. The trial conflict register also identified his AVPA roles and euCONSENT secretary-general role. Separately, he is a credited author of the August 2024 AgeAware consultation specification.",
        "structuralRole": "Professional linking industry representation, interoperability design and trial engagement",
        "significance": "Corby's overlapping roles create a specific conflict-management question because organizations he served were connected to potential trial participants. The register's exclusions show how that overlap was intended to be managed. Later review commitments make the boundary worth following without treating overlap itself as a breach.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Roles and exclusions",
            "text": "The register excluded Corby from testing age-assurance systems and from euCONSENT's submission process, restricting his trial role to stakeholder engagement. July 2025 minutes record an intention to review technical and vendor report parts B–J for consistency. The actual review and operative exclusion decision were not obtained. His AgeAware authorship is another dated contribution; the specification credits Alastair Graham and Ben Gower alongside him.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e21",
              "e22",
              "e23",
              "w1-australia-edge-corby-review-commitment",
              "w7-market-e-corby-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minutes record intended technical/vendor-section review. Completion and conflict-specific limits were not established. The conflict register restricts his role to stakeholder engagement as well as excluding system testing and euCONSENT submission. The operative scope and actual work need the exclusion decision and signoffs; breach is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-corby-review-commitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trial draft technical/vendor report review",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "committed to reviewing Parts B–J for consistency",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "Trial draft technical/vendor report review",
            "date": "Commitment recorded July8,2025; not evidence of completed review."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Work-package 3 lead through SafetyTech Ltd. Register excludes him from testing age-assurance systems and from euCONSENT's submission process; no failure of those safeguards established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e21"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Stakeholder-engagement lead",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Conflict register identifies Corby's services to AVPA while its members were expected trial participants. Mitigations were disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Director / executive director roles",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Cover names Iain Corby, Alastair Graham and Ben Gower; Corby document author. No sole authorship or completed approval inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-corby-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is a credited author of the proposed specification for",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Version1.0,5 August 2024."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Conflict register identifies euCONSENT role and potential trial entry; excludes Corby from its submission process.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "euCONSENT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Secretary general",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "euCONSENT",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format",
            "text": "The acquired original is the AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, WP1 Business Requirements, version1.0, dated5 August2024, 25pages. Cover authors are Iain Corby, Alastair Graham (design authority pro tem) and Ben Gower (technical architect). PDF2's document-control table names T Allen of ACCS as the required approver and R Kiddle of ACCS as reviewer. The Action column identifies Approver/Reviewer; completion Date cells are blank and no signed approval is shown. It is an intended approval chain, not evidence that Allen signed or approved the final implementation. AVPA, Yoti, AgeChecked and VerifyMy are named proposed reviewers. The January9,2025 euCONSENT account subsequently says the three providers worked on detailed design; these are separate evidence states.",
            "matched": [
              "Iain Corby",
              "Corby"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "70d6e47c5d4fc660b8208cf875fb22fd54ce76a18a2f0bb1fe10c2448ca706d6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The missing public board sequence is now acquired. It documents responses, some changed procedures and retained limits. It also identifies a consequential boundary: Corby's declared exclusion covered testing and euCONSENT submission, while July minutes record his intention to review technical and vendor report sections. That is a question about the scope and operation of the exclusion, not proof of its breach.",
            "matched": [
              "Corby"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "bffa396cf09fbd53a4694fbd344ebbecaea5c3dac4eaceeecd8c9d6f8523fd14"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "avpa",
      "label": "Age Verification Providers Association",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An association representing companies supplying age-verification and age-assurance services.",
      "aliases": [
        "AVPA",
        "Age ID"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Industry association"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/avpa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "avpa",
        "name": "Age Verification Providers Association",
        "role": "Industry association",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An association representing companies supplying age-verification and age-assurance services.",
        "why": "Its members operate in a market that can expand when governments require services to establish users’ ages. Its technical evidence can also affect which methods qualify.",
        "about": [
          "Ofcom expressly credited AVPA evidence in its January 2025 decision to accept email-based estimation. The Australian trial is a separate connection. Neither participation in a trial nor acceptance of a method is an award of every resulting contract."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "AVPA",
          "Age ID"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An association representing companies supplying age-verification and age-assurance services.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry representation for age-verification suppliers",
        "significance": "AVPA organises and represents businesses supplying age-verification services. It matters where proposed safety duties become a market for assurance tools and where providers contribute to standards or policy consultations.",
        "background": [
          "Ofcom expressly credited AVPA evidence in its January 2025 decision to accept email-based estimation. The Australian trial is a separate connection. Neither participation in a trial nor acceptance of a method is an award of every resulting contract."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom expressly credits AVPA and VerifyMy evidence in adding email-based age estimation. The complete original submitted technical evidence remains not obtained; the regulator account supports attributed contribution without independently verifying performance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-avpa-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
            "sourceName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "targetName": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "date": "Evidence considered by 16 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Conflict register identifies Corby's services to AVPA while its members were expected trial participants. Mitigations were disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Iain Corby",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Director / executive director roles",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations. This edge establishes project work, not uninspected grant terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project DefAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Project delivery",
            "sourceName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current AVPA retrospective says ASBL technology development continued until2025 and points to private-sector alternative ecosystems. Does not establish company dissolution or exact service termination, but limits depicting the2024 design as a current mandatory network.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avpa-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes the project's demonstration mission as fulfilled alongside private alternatives",
            "sourceName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Undated current page captured9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "3. A standards editor is also a certification-business principal",
            "text": "Policy lane separately owns the Ofcom January2025 disposition crediting AVPA/VerifyMy evidence for adding email estimation. That is actual method-level uptake; it is not evidence VerifyMy supplies every platform using the method. Ofcom's refusal to make independent certification compulsory or automatically sufficient must accompany any combined narrative.",
            "matched": [
              "AVPA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ba174a7853037b249ed9ce6e16a394b793fa6ec639477e6fdb076910f9059ac0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format",
            "text": "January2025's project update reports completed issuer/key/relying-party/tally services, with anonymisation/app and scaling still in progress. Current AVPA text says development continued until2025 and that euCONSENT's demonstration mission is fulfilled with private-sector alternatives available. Thus no candidate claims AgeAware currently operates as a mandatory gate. Its design also included regulatory sandboxes and Australia trial consideration; an offered/tendered solution is not an award.",
            "matched": [
              "AVPA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9c9048247728c623f0228fc062a5d36b5ec62347c70cb8de14dc410c3fcd94f6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices",
            "heading": "What consultation actually changed",
            "text": "Paragraphs 3.85–3.87, PDF 27: AVPA/VerifyMy evidence supported adding email-based estimation, conditional on effective implementation. Paragraphs 3.103–3.105, PDF 30–31: token references were added, retaining responsibility for the underlying check and sharing process. The preceding response summary, paragraphs 3.66–3.68 and footnote 94 on PDF 24, attributes the token recommendation to 5Rights, Yoti and the ACT App Association. Paragraph 3.108, PDF 31, and 3.350–3.353, PDF 76–77: certification can evidence compliance but is neither compulsory nor automatic; Ofcom did not adopt Yoti's request to mandate independent testing/certification. Paragraphs 3.243–3.259, PDF 54–57: requested numerical thresholds were declined at that stage, citing inadequate comparable evidence/testing and market-development concerns. Paragraphs 3.277–3.290, PDF 62–65: 5Rights' separate privacy-criterion proposal was declined because existing data-protection law applied; design/minimisation guidance was strengthened. None of these outcomes proves a private bargain or sole authorship.",
            "matched": [
              "AVPA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a48c32bc328e15a927c3ac607141b352bb0a41f2c8e3606535f5aa84cc481240"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
            "heading": "The same market reports persistent friction",
            "text": "The report's acknowledgements include AVPA, Ofcom, OSTIA, Resolver, Yoti and other suppliers. That establishes participation or research input at the stated combined level, not that each answered every question, endorsed all conclusions or belonged to the earlier CDEI group. Its contextual citations include a Paladin/PUBLIC/Perspective Economics market study and a Tony Blair Institute paper. Citation does not establish commissioning by either organization.",
            "matched": [
              "AVPA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cd85f1a25861669082b627c5a47f18edad1addead072ec54e7f3444f05bdd12a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Age Verification Providers Association represents businesses selling age-verification and age-assurance services. Its influence is most visible where supplier evidence helps determine which methods regulators accept, and where interoperability projects propose how age credentials could move between services.",
          "structuralRole": "Supplier expertise shaping the market for age assurance",
          "significance": "AVPA connects policy decisions to a commercial market. When a regulator accepts a method, providers gain an opportunity to sell services built around it; the association helps organize the evidence and common positions that enter those decisions.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Age Verification Providers Association is the industry body for businesses supplying age checks and related assurance services. Its members operate in a market whose boundaries are substantially shaped by public policy: which services must assess age, what counts as an effective method, and what evidence demonstrates compliance. AVPA gives those suppliers a collective voice in that process.",
            "The clearest recorded example is Ofcom's January 2025 decision on highly effective age assurance. Ofcom expressly credited evidence from AVPA and VerifyMy when it added email-based age estimation to the list of methods capable of meeting its criteria. That is a tangible contribution to a regulatory decision. A method accepted into the framework becomes an option that affected services can evaluate, subject to how it actually performs in use.",
            "AVPA also appears in the Australian age-assurance trial's surrounding network. The retained conflict register disclosed Iain Corby's services to the association while its members were expected to participate in the trial, together with mitigation arrangements. The register also identified AVPA and ACCS as delivery organizations for Project DefAI. These records connect trade representation, technical project work and public testing programmes.",
            "Its euCONSENT work explored a further question: how an age result could be reused across services rather than checked from scratch each time. The AgeAware design included issuer, key, relying-party and tally services. AVPA's later account says development continued until 2025 and describes the demonstration mission as fulfilled alongside private alternatives. The association matters because it helps shape both acceptable methods and the architecture of the market built to supply them."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
            },
            {
              "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
              "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
            },
            {
              "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
              "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "euconsent",
      "label": "euCONSENT",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Historical project umbrella spanning the earlier EC-funded consortium and later Belgian euCONSENT ASBL. The later ASBL published the Safe Online-supported AgeAware proposal. Proposed commercial rules and reported proof of concept are distinct from a current mandatory service.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/euconsent",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "euconsent",
        "name": "euCONSENT",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Historical project umbrella spanning the earlier EC-funded consortium and later Belgian euCONSENT ASBL. The later ASBL published the Safe Online-supported AgeAware proposal. Proposed commercial rules and reported proof of concept are distinct from a current mandatory service.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical project umbrella spanning the earlier EC-funded consortium and later Belgian euCONSENT ASBL. The later ASBL published the Safe Online-supported AgeAware proposal. Proposed commercial rules and reported proof of concept are distinct from a current mandatory service."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "euCONSENT is the name of an age-verification and consent interoperability project, first associated with an EC-funded consortium and later with a Belgian association, euCONSENT ASBL. The later association published the Safe Online-supported AgeAware design.",
        "structuralRole": "Designer of a proposed market for age assurance",
        "significance": "AgeAware is significant because it proposes rules for who may participate, how transactions are counted and billed, and who may suspend a participant. Those governance choices would distribute commercial and practical authority among the scheme operator and verification providers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Separate projects and proposed powers",
            "text": "The earlier 2021 European Commission consortium grant must be distinguished from the later ASBL’s Phase II support from Safe Online. The AgeAware consultation proposes admission and fit-and-proper checks, licensing, tally access and suspension rules, including negotiated core-component exclusivity and a proposed three-year exclusive commercial scheme. These are published design proposals, not an executed compulsory service. A January 2025 update also reported commissioning a human-rights review through team academics. The contract, fee, clearance terms and completion of that review were not recovered.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e23",
              "w7-market-e-safe-phase2",
              "w7-market-e-euconsent-ageaware",
              "w7-adv-e-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Version1.0 consultation locates admission criteria, fit-and-proper review, licensing, tally access and participant suspension in ASBL-governed ecosystem. Includes negotiated core-component exclusivity and proposed three-year commercial-scheme exclusivity, then contestability. This is a published proposal, not an executed concession or current compulsory gate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-euconsent-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a proposed admission, billing and governance design for",
            "sourceName": "euCONSENT",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Consultation5 August 2024; final approval/implementation not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Conflict register identifies euCONSENT role and potential trial entry; excludes Corby from its submission process.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Iain Corby",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Secretary general",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "euCONSENT",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Cover/section1.9 and recipient project update acknowledge Safe Online funding for euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware, establishing reported project-level purpose. Executed amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain not obtained. Original2021 EC consortium grant is separate and not assigned to later ASBL.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-safe-phase2"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Online funding programme",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is acknowledged as funding Phase II delivered by the later ASBL",
            "sourceName": "Safe Online funding programme",
            "targetName": "euCONSENT",
            "date": "Acknowledged5 August 2024 and9 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "euCONSENT's project update reported commissioning a review of AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact through team academics. The article identifies the later ASBL project context; the contracting legal instrument, fee, clearance terms and completion are unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported commissioning",
            "sourceName": "euCONSENT",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The missing public board sequence is now acquired. It documents responses, some changed procedures and retained limits. It also identifies a consequential boundary: Corby's declared exclusion covered testing and euCONSENT submission, while July minutes record his intention to review technical and vendor report sections. That is a question about the scope and operation of the exclusion, not proof of its breach.",
            "matched": [
              "euCONSENT"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "bffa396cf09fbd53a4694fbd344ebbecaea5c3dac4eaceeecd8c9d6f8523fd14"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format",
            "text": "January2025's project update reports completed issuer/key/relying-party/tally services, with anonymisation/app and scaling still in progress. Current AVPA text says development continued until2025 and that euCONSENT's demonstration mission is fulfilled with private-sector alternatives available. Thus no candidate claims AgeAware currently operates as a mandatory gate. Its design also included regulatory sandboxes and Australia trial consideration; an offered/tendered solution is not an award.",
            "matched": [
              "euCONSENT"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9c9048247728c623f0228fc062a5d36b5ec62347c70cb8de14dc410c3fcd94f6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format",
            "text": "The proposal is sponsored by Safe Online and delivered by the Belgian nonprofit euCONSENT ASBL (cover and1.9, PDF3). It builds on an earlier European Commission-funded consortium project; do not backdate ASBL as the original 2021 grant recipient. The reported project-level funding purpose is established. The executed grant agreement, amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain unacquired; a separately encountered $2million figure belongs to a ten-project portfolio and is not assigned here.",
            "matched": [
              "euCONSENT"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "26aa02dd7a0a34606a6b0e5ecc14fab9bc15cde1b23904f60be02312032c3027"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "innovate-uk",
      "label": "Innovate UK",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Identified public funder of Project DefAI in the trial conflict register; amount not recovered.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/innovate-uk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "innovate-uk",
        "name": "Innovate UK",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Identified public funder of Project DefAI in the trial conflict register; amount not recovered.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Identified public funder of Project DefAI in the trial conflict register; amount not recovered."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Identified public funder of Project DefAI in the trial conflict register; amount not recovered.",
        "structuralRole": "Government",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Conflict register explicitly identifies Project DefAI as Innovate UK-funded. No grant amount or onward funding to ControlAI was recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project DefAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Project funding disclosed",
            "sourceName": "Innovate UK",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "defai",
      "label": "Project DefAI",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Delivered by AVPA and ACCS, according to trial conflict register.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Project"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/defai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "defai",
        "name": "Project DefAI",
        "role": "Project",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Delivered by AVPA and ACCS, according to trial conflict register.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Delivered by AVPA and ACCS, according to trial conflict register."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Project DefAI is a funded project identified in the Australian age-assurance trial's conflict register. That record names Innovate UK as funder, AVPA and ACCS as delivery organizations, and Illuminate Tech as an adviser on ethics, data collection and outreach.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed project relationship joining public funding, industry delivery and ethics advice",
        "significance": "The project explains another working relationship among actors involved around the trial. The useful information is the allocation of roles—funder, delivery organizations and adviser—rather than an assumed common policy agenda. The register does not provide enough detail to infer a wider programme or particular technical results.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope of the disclosure",
            "text": "The 2024–25 register explicitly identifies the funding and delivery relationships and describes Illuminate Tech's advisory subjects. No grant amount, executed terms or project evaluation appears in the retained evidence. This is a record of disclosed work and interests, not evidence of onward funding to ControlAI or a demonstrated failure of trial safeguards.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e24",
              "e25",
              "e26",
              "e27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Conflict register explicitly identifies Project DefAI as Innovate UK-funded. No grant amount or onward funding to ControlAI was recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Innovate UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Project funding disclosed",
            "sourceName": "Innovate UK",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations. This edge establishes project work, not uninspected grant terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Project delivery",
            "sourceName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Trial conflict register describes Illuminate Tech advice on ethics, data collection and outreach for Project DefAI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Illuminate Tech",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Ethics / data / outreach advice",
            "sourceName": "Illuminate Tech",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Project delivery",
            "sourceName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "illuminate-tech",
      "label": "Illuminate Tech",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Advises Project DefAI on ethics, data collection and outreach; trial delivery-team participant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/illuminate-tech",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "illuminate-tech",
        "name": "Illuminate Tech",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Advises Project DefAI on ethics, data collection and outreach; trial delivery-team participant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advises Project DefAI on ethics, data collection and outreach; trial delivery-team participant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Illuminate Tech is an advisory and compliance-technology participant identified in the age-assurance trial's conflict register and in a later supplier collaboration announcement. The register describes advice to Project DefAI on ethics, data collection and outreach; Resolver's March 2026 account identifies Illuminate's OSCAR workflow tool.",
        "structuralRole": "Advisor and software supplier connecting safety-policy work with compliance services",
        "significance": "The organization occupies both a research-advisory setting and a commercial implementation setting. That sequence helps explain how expertise around safety policy can be offered as a service to organizations facing regulation, while the records do not establish a public purchase or exclusive supplier role.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From advice to advertised collaboration",
            "text": "The 2024–25 register identifies Illuminate's DefAI advisory subjects. On 18 March 2026 Resolver announced a collaboration combining its expertise with Illuminate's OSCAR to serve the UK Online Safety Act and EU Digital Services Act market. The announcement describes translating requirements into compliance workflows. It establishes a supplier's reported offering, rather than inspected deployment, proprietary-rights terms or regulatory endorsement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e27",
              "w15-impl-e-illuminate-partnership",
              "w15-impl-e-illuminate-oscar"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Trial conflict register describes Illuminate Tech advice on ethics, data collection and outreach for Project DefAI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project DefAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Ethics / data / outreach advice",
            "sourceName": "Illuminate Tech",
            "targetName": "Project DefAI",
            "date": "2024–25 register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "18March2026 supplier account: joint engagement forUKOSA/EUDSA market, Resolver expertise plus IlluminateOSCAR. Not official endorsement, contract award or mandatory vendor selection. Existing Illuminate organization reused; legal-registration identity not newly supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-illuminate-partnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announces compliance-service collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Illuminate Tech",
            "date": "2026-03-18 – 2026-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "OSCAR translates requirements into compliance workflows. Claimed product role; no proprietary-rights instrument, public purchaser or actual deployment inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-illuminate-oscar"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSCAR compliance workflow tool",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announcement identifies tool supplier",
            "sourceName": "Illuminate Tech",
            "targetName": "OSCAR compliance workflow tool",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "digi",
      "label": "DIGI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Industry body whose April 2025 objections appear in official FOI documents; objections are not adjudicated trial defects. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Industry body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/digi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "digi",
        "name": "DIGI",
        "role": "Industry body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Industry body whose April 2025 objections appear in official FOI documents; objections are not adjudicated trial defects. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Industry body whose April 2025 objections appear in official FOI documents; objections are not adjudicated trial defects. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
          "Industry body whose April 2025 objections appear in official FOI documents; objections are not adjudicated trial defects."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Industry body whose April 2025 objections appear in official FOI documents; objections are not adjudicated trial defects. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [
          "Industry body whose April 2025 objections appear in official FOI documents; objections are not adjudicated trial defects."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DIGI's 16 April 2025 letter in official FOI25-409 pp10–13 raises design, recruitment, competing-role and pre-existing regulatory commitment concerns. These are representations of an interested industry body, not adjudicated defects.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e28"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Raised contemporaneous objections",
            "sourceName": "DIGI",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "2025-04-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "social-research-centre",
      "label": "Social Research Centre",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Consumer research supplier; official August 2024 order records A$278,293.40 including GST.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/social-research-centre",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "social-research-centre",
        "name": "Social Research Centre",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Consumer research supplier; official August 2024 order records A$278,293.40 including GST.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Consumer research supplier; official August 2024 order records A$278,293.40 including GST."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Consumer research supplier; official August 2024 order records A$278,293.40 including GST.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FOI25-409 PDF p32 records an order executed 28 August 2024 for consumer research, A$278,293.40 including GST. Contract/order value, not proof all cash was received.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "A$278,293.40 consumer research order",
            "sourceName": "Australian infrastructure department",
            "targetName": "Social Research Centre",
            "date": "2024-08-28"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "esafety",
      "label": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Australia’s online-safety regulator, with statutory powers and international relationships involving safety policy.",
      "aliases": [
        "eSafety",
        "Australia",
        "Duty of Care"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Online-safety regulator"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/esafety",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "esafety",
        "name": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
        "role": "Online-safety regulator",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Australia’s online-safety regulator, with statutory powers and international relationships involving safety policy.",
        "why": "The proposed digital duty of care would give the regulator a consequential role alongside Parliament and ministerial rulemaking.",
        "about": [
          "The 8 September 2026 exposure draft remains a proposal. Its researcher-access provisions specify Australian-university employment and prospective approval rules, which is narrower than Reset’s requested inclusion of third-sector researchers. The draft examined here does not establish universal identification."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "eSafety",
          "Australia",
          "Duty of Care"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 18
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australia’s online-safety regulator, with statutory powers and international relationships involving safety policy.",
        "structuralRole": "Australian regulatory authority and international policy exchange",
        "significance": "The eSafety Commissioner links statutory online-safety powers with international networks and policy advice. Its role needs to be read through the specific duties, notices and proposals involved, including where another government body controls the final legislative decision.",
        "background": [
          "The 8 September 2026 exposure draft remains a proposal. Its researcher-access provisions specify Australian-university employment and prospective approval rules, which is narrower than Reset’s requested inclusion of third-sector researchers. The draft examined here does not establish universal identification."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 enforcement amendment",
            "text": "An enacted amendment expands access to compliance information and creates examination powers. It commenced September 12. The legal power is established; the next question is what evidence eSafety obtains and how it uses it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-au-e-information",
              "w43-au-e-examination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-au-enforcement-in-force"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section36 request cannot issue before first anniversary under that section and no more than once per 12 months; two-month response period. Section38 requires records for two years after relevant calendar-year end. Other reporting powers and substantive duties are not postponed by these limits; no request or delivery to a particular service acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-report-records"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes bounded reports and requires compliance records",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FOI Doc21 PDF34 is eSafety's 21 May 2025 reply referencing X Corp v eSafety, NSD751/2025. eSafety refuses the requested undertaking concerning non-enforcement while proceedings continue. Consultation coexisted with dispute; no court outcome, current applicability determination or connection to particular toolkit wording is claimed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-dispute"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "X Corp.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contests standard applicability in a recorded court dispute with",
            "sourceName": "X Corp.",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "October 3 outreach recommends considering DIS coverage; November reply says likely captured and22 December commencement; December 5 and January 8 follow-ups seek details of changes. This correspondence is not a compliance certificate and supplies no Drawnudes identity join.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-clothoff-outreach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ClothOff — service correspondence",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sent preparatory guidance and sought details of claimed changes",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "ClothOff — service correspondence",
            "date": "Actual correspondence span; not an interval of certified compliance."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Doc19 pp30-31: AttachmentA core content and AttachmentB tools; emphasis on B; deadline16May, optional20May meeting, second final-draft redline opportunity announced. These are offered process steps, not proof all occurred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-consultation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "invites written edits and verbal feedback through",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "5May2025 invitation quoted in16May chain"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section26D PDF38-39: reasonable belief of past/present noncompliance triggers written future-prevention directions. Not unlimited orders. Civil penalties and infringement notices have distinct processes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-esafety-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Covered online-service providers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would issue compliance directions on reasonable belief",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections26A and198-205 specify assessments/information, building on existing authority. New general compliance limb excludes Part4A age-ban duties. No universal identity-collection mandate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-esafety"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would extend assessment and compliance powers",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Toolkit describes itself as output of a December2024 eSafety/DHS workshop; paper citation accessed November2025. Do not infer the citation was present at that earlier workshop.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-toolkit-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes guidance in",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "Version label4March2026; citation access26November2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Educational agency page separate from Commissioner workstream role, official review paper and proposed Australian legal categories. No vendor requirement identified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-esafety-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes industry Safety by Design guidance",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "Released correspondence supplies a specific drafting route",
            "text": "The official eSafety FOI25139 / LOG118 document set contains a May2025 industry consultation chain. The consequential readable record is Document19, PDF29-31 , which preserves the 5May invitation and a 16May response from an @x.com correspondent. The invitation says the toolkit had been developed since the December2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop, using workshop insights. Its draft core-content list already includes end-to-end encryption and AI. That establishes the subject's presence in a May2025 draft outline, not the four particular recommendations or a December2024 version of those sentences.",
            "matched": [
              "eSafety"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc8db2462794a8bb2063ed7d272ef789d220836de8463e09e113a00c7e5ce257"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "Who contributed, and who approved?",
            "text": "The original Nov2024 paper remains attributed to contemporary ICMEC Australia. This lane does not reinterpret its authorship using a later business-name change or retrospectively treat the international ICMEC organisation as publisher.",
            "matched": [
              "Australia"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "85f0d25a1c719462b6320804a1dcf176787f5bbc25316d5993840022c80294ae"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The new evidence identifies a funded research route and a real toolkit consultation process. It does not identify the person or organisation that supplied eSafety's encrypted-environment recommendations. This lane made no canonical case edits, outreach or public submissions.",
            "matched": [
              "eSafety"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b98d025d2bbe0b401024caa228647b6264bc9b417930df1fc0f42064561e91a7"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?",
            "heading": "The two concrete rival clocks",
            "text": "The current eSafety guidance index dates the BOSE guidance's January2025 revision to the replacement of AAT by ART. A guidance revision date must not be relabelled legislative commencement. The available record does not establish that the respondent meant this update, or knew of it before the email.",
            "matched": [
              "eSafety"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "14138b46179999bb7ef3fab0d4a89a1d86e151f723e8d64b30c8aa06f6dfad18"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?"
          },
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Australia's eSafety Commissioner is a regulator whose work combines enforceable online-safety standards, industry guidance and international policy exchange. It is also the institution that would gain expanded assessment and compliance powers under the September 2026 digital duty-of-care exposure draft.",
          "structuralRole": "Australian enforcement and safety-design ideas with international reach",
          "significance": "eSafety joins domestic authority to an international policy network. Its standards can create operational duties, while its guidance and consultations help define what responsible service design is expected to look like. The proposed duty would extend that role.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Australia's eSafety Commissioner is a public regulator working on online harms. Its influence has two connected forms: authority under Australian law and the production of guidance that circulates among technology companies and other governments. Commissioner Julie Inman Grant also represents the institution in WeProtect's governance, while the World Economic Forum has described its digital-safety principles as complementing eSafety's Safety by Design framework.",
            "The regulator's toolkit work shows how that guidance is produced. A March 2026 child-exploitation toolkit followed an eSafety and US Department of Homeland Security workshop. Released correspondence records industry invitations to comment on draft material, propose edits and participate in further discussions. This is an organized process for bringing operational knowledge and outside preferences into guidance that companies may use when designing services.",
            "The record also shows direct contact with services. eSafety wrote to ClothOff about likely coverage by Australia's designated internet services standard, recommended preparation and later sought details of claimed changes. Other correspondence records a dispute with X over the standard's applicability. These interactions place practical obligations, company responses and the possibility of legal challenge in the same picture.",
            "The September 2026 digital duty-of-care exposure draft would expand this role through service assessments, information powers and written compliance directions based on a reasonable belief of noncompliance. It remains a proposal at this edition's cutoff. The underlying shift is nevertheless clear: scrutiny moves from individual items toward how a service anticipates and manages risks. eSafety matters because it is the institution expected to translate that approach into day-to-day regulatory decisions."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "WeProtect governance",
              "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
              "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
              "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
            },
            {
              "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
              "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
              "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "inman-grant",
      "label": "Julie Inman Grant",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "eSafety Commissioner; WeProtect board and WEF coalition involvement recorded in 2023–24 official report.",
      "aliases": [
        "Julie Inman Grant"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/inman-grant",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "inman-grant",
        "name": "Julie Inman Grant",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "eSafety Commissioner; WeProtect board and WEF coalition involvement recorded in 2023–24 official report.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "eSafety Commissioner; WeProtect board and WEF coalition involvement recorded in 2023–24 official report."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Julie Inman Grant"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Julie Inman Grant is the Australian eSafety Commissioner identified in the 2023–24 official annual report. That report also records her WeProtect board role and participation in the WEF Global Coalition for Digital Safety. Separate records show both contributions to a harm typology and exercise of statutory standard-making authority.",
        "structuralRole": "Public regulator participating in international policy work and making domestic standards",
        "significance": "Her international roles create routes for ideas and professional exchange; her domestic office supplies legally defined powers. Keeping those channels separate lets readers see the difference between contributing to a coalition publication and making an instrument under Australian legislation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Contribution and exercised authority",
            "text": "A participant account identifies Inman Grant as a co-chair of the WEF typology workstream, and the 2023 document credits her as a foreword signatory. Separately, she made the Designated Internet Services Class 1A/1B Industry Standard on 19 June 2024 under section 145 of the Online Safety Act; it was registered on 21 June. That instrument is delegated legislation, while the typology contribution is a distinct publication role.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e30",
              "e31",
              "e32",
              "w14-tax-e-inman-cochair",
              "w14-tax-e-inman-foreword",
              "w25-sf-e-dis-made"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official annual report records participation in WEF's Global Coalition for Digital Safety. This is distinct from WEF's Digital Trust programme and establishes no WEF control over eSafety.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e32"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Economic Forum",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Digital Safety coalition participation",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "World Economic Forum",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Made19 June 2024 under Online Safety Act section 145, registered 21 June. This is delegated legislation, not case-specific permission. Existing public-official identity reused.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-made"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made the industry standard under statutory authority",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "date": "2024-06-19 – 2024-06-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-inman-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official annual report records WeProtect board membership in 2023–24. Root's separate current governance evidence may support a current edge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e31"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board role",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official ACMA/eSafety report records the commissioner's role; source period is 2023–24.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e30"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissioner",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-inman-cochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "weprotect",
      "label": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An international alliance bringing governments, technology companies and civil-society organisations together around online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
      "aliases": [
        "We Protect"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Child-protection alliance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/weprotect",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "weprotect",
        "name": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
        "role": "Child-protection alliance",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "An international alliance bringing governments, technology companies and civil-society organisations together around online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
        "why": "Its composition puts public authority, platforms and advocacy organisations in the same policy forum. Its funding and board participation provide specific routes to examine.",
        "about": [
          "The UK Home Office has documented historical funding and a permanent board seat. Oak’s 2025 report lists a three-year $2,368,421 core-support award.",
          "WeProtect’s Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in an EU proposal consultation. That policy position can be compared with objections from rights groups, including other Oak grantees."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "We Protect"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 22
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An international alliance bringing governments, technology companies and civil-society organisations together around online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
        "structuralRole": "A policy forum joining governments, platforms and NGOs",
        "significance": "WeProtect brings state officials, technology businesses and civil-society organisations into a common child-protection forum. Its funding, board participation and published policy positions provide concrete ways to examine how that forum influences agendas and proposed rules.",
        "background": [
          "The UK Home Office has documented historical funding and a permanent board seat. Oak’s 2025 report lists a three-year $2,368,421 core-support award.",
          "WeProtect’s Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in an EU proposal consultation. That policy position can be compared with objections from rights groups, including other Oak grantees."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Board discussion and Secretariat intention recorded in July 2022. Separate later records establish an actual published consultation and campaign participation; this minute alone does not establish delivery.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e170"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Planned accessible advocacy material",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "11–12 Jul 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Accounts p6 explicitly links the research to its legislative case; review p7 describes commissioning and subsequent policymaker engagement. Provider contract and manuscript approval record not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-survey-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned research for EU-legislation advocacy",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "date": "PublishedJune 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July 2022 minutes record a Commission briefing to the WeProtect board and possible requests for assistance. Particular requests and resulting outputs are not established by this record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e169"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefed board on EU proposal",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "11–12 Jul 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WeProtect's minutes describe Five Country Working Group principles through a Home Office presentation; no separate direct Working Group-to-WeProtect interaction is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n34"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Five Country Working Group",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Subject of Home Office briefing",
            "sourceName": "Five Country Working Group",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "June 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "June 2024 minutes record the Home Office update and an August response timeframe for early September ministerial meetings in Australia. Final briefings/adoption not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n33"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Home Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefed board on five-country work",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "June 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "UK strategy describes sole financial donor status up to that point. Subsequent donors mean this is not a current sole-funder claim. Amount not specified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e166"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Home Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Historical sole donor · 2021",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "2021 strategy"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official annual report records WeProtect board membership in 2023–24. Root's separate current governance evidence may support a current edge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e31"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board role",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "WeProtect's hub records launching #ChildSafetyOnlineNow with 13 other organizations; the current campaign uses Child Safety ON branding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Child Safety ON",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Campaign launch recorded",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "Child Safety ON",
            "date": "Hub updated 2023-01-10; current campaign observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
            "title": "Oak support for Check My Ads: a verified grant, bounded terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "WeProtect Global Alliance brings governments, technology companies and civil-society organizations together around online child sexual exploitation and abuse. It combines policy access, commissioned research and public campaigning, with a funding history that includes the UK Home Office and Oak Foundation.",
          "structuralRole": "Government, industry and philanthropy meeting around child-protection policy",
          "significance": "WeProtect matters because it connects people who frame a problem with institutions able to legislate, fund a response or implement it. Board minutes make parts of that exchange visible, including government briefings and advocacy planning.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "WeProtect is an international alliance built around the prevention of online child sexual exploitation and abuse. Its membership brings public authorities, technology businesses and civil-society groups into the same policy forum. The European Commission and the Australian eSafety Commissioner appear in its governance, alongside other institutional participants. This gives the alliance a route into decisions well beyond the reach of an ordinary public campaign.",
            "Its resources have broadened over time. A 2021 UK strategy described the Home Office as its sole financial donor at that point. Oak Foundation's 2023 report subsequently listed a three-year core-support award of $2,368,421. Its organizational structure includes a Dutch foundation and a UK operating company, a policy board that approved the 2024 budget, and executive roles responsible for expenditure and assets. Those are the practical institutions behind the public alliance name.",
            "The work goes beyond convening. WeProtect commissioned European online-harms research to support its legislative case, published consultation material and recorded launching a child-safety campaign with thirteen other organizations. In July 2022 the European Commission briefed its board on a legislative proposal. In June 2024 the Home Office briefed it on five-country work ahead of ministerial meetings. These records show research, government access and advocacy being assembled into a continuing operation.",
            "That combination makes WeProtect one of the most important connecting organizations in this investigation. It can help turn child-protection priorities into shared policy language and distribute those priorities across jurisdictions. Its Secretariat authors particular submissions, while participating governments and companies make their own subsequent decisions. To understand its influence, follow the commissioned work and the public institutions that take it up."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
              "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
            },
            {
              "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
              "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
              "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
              "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
              "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wef",
      "label": "World Economic Forum",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Browne republication and NTI event links here; online-safety institutional links mapped separately. Convened Global Coalition for Digital Safety and related principles work. Digital Trust is a different WEF programme.",
      "aliases": [
        "WEF"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wef",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wef",
        "name": "World Economic Forum",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Browne republication and NTI event links here; online-safety institutional links mapped separately. Convened Global Coalition for Digital Safety and related principles work. Digital Trust is a different WEF programme.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Browne republication and NTI event links here; online-safety institutional links mapped separately. Convened Global Coalition for Digital Safety and related principles work. Digital Trust is a different WEF programme."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WEF"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The World Economic Forum appears here as a convenor and publisher across several policy fields. In online safety it convened Global Coalition for Digital Safety work, including principles and a 2023 harm typology. Other retained records concern an earlier nuclear-security republication and a biological-risk roundtable.",
        "structuralRole": "Forum through which different institutions develop and circulate policy material",
        "significance": "WEF's recurring presence can reflect publication and convening rather than a single command structure. Identifying the particular programme and output is essential: digital-safety participation, Digital Trust and a historical security event are different relationships with different participants and implications.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Distinct outputs and events",
            "text": "The January 2023 principles account names companies, regulators and NGOs in joint work; the August typology supplies a contextual vocabulary of online harms. Separately, WEF republished a Des Browne co-authored article in March 2015 and co-hosted a biological-risk roundtable with the Nuclear Threat Initiative on 20 September 2017. Those historical publication and event links do not establish a ControlAI partnership or authority over participating regulators.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e32",
              "e33",
              "w14-tax-e-published",
              "e141",
              "e143"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official annual report records participation in WEF's Global Coalition for Digital Safety. This is distinct from WEF's Digital Trust programme and establishes no WEF control over eSafety.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e32"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Digital Safety coalition participation",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "World Economic Forum",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Landing dates publication4August2023 and identifies Global Coalition for Digital Safety output. No contract, selection vote or exact final editorial approval established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes coalition typology",
            "sourceName": "World Economic Forum",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "2023-08-04 – 2023-08-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2015 Project Syndicate republication on WEF; WEF disclaimer of endorsement. Publication relation, not appointment or ControlAI partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e141"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Des Browne",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthored republished article",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "World Economic Forum",
            "date": "2015-03-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WEF describes its digital-safety principles working group and resulting joint policy work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e33"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Convened principles work",
            "sourceName": "World Economic Forum",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "New York event September 20, 2017. No ControlAI connection or funding inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e143"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-hosted biological-risk roundtable",
            "sourceName": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
            "targetName": "World Economic Forum",
            "date": "2017-09-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "WEF digital-safety principles",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "2023 joint policy-development work involving NGOs, regulated firms and regulators.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wef-safety-principles",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wef-safety-principles",
        "name": "WEF digital-safety principles",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2023 joint policy-development work involving NGOs, regulated firms and regulators.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2023 joint policy-development work involving NGOs, regulated firms and regulators."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The WEF digital-safety principles are a joint policy-development output described by the World Economic Forum on 9 January 2023. The working group brought together platform companies, regulators and civil-society organizations, and WEF described the principles as complementing eSafety's Safety by Design framework.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared policy language developed across regulatory, commercial and civil-society participants",
        "significance": "The working group is a concrete forum for developing common expectations. Its cross-sector composition can help policy ideas circulate between institutions that later implement or advocate them, but shared drafting participation does not make the participants a single authority or establish identical commercial interests.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who participated",
            "text": "WEF names WeProtect, Ofcom, Google, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon among participants in the principles work. Its stated connection to eSafety is one of complementary frameworks. These records establish convening and joint policy development; they do not give the WEF statutory authority over the regulator or identify a campaign-specific payment by each participating company.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e33",
              "e34",
              "e35",
              "e36",
              "e37",
              "e184"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are named participants. Google is shown separately. Shared policy development does not establish common ownership or interchangeable agendas.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e35"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft / Meta / Amazon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named working-group participants",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft / Meta / Amazon",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Google appears in the WEF principles working group and separately has WeProtect board representation. Neither relationship alone proves campaign funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e184"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named working-group participant",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WEF says its principles complement eSafety's Safety by Design framework. This is policy alignment/joint ecosystem context, not an authority relationship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e37"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Safety by Design framework connection",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WEF identifies WeProtect in the principles working group alongside firms, regulators and rights organisations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e34"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Working-group participant",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WEF describes its digital-safety principles working group and resulting joint policy work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e33"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Economic Forum",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Convened principles work",
            "sourceName": "World Economic Forum",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom is named in the WEF principles working group.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e36"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Working-group participant",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "tech-principles-members",
      "label": "Microsoft / Meta / Amazon",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Named participants in the WEF digital-safety working group. Google is represented separately to preserve its other documented relationships.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/tech-principles-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "tech-principles-members",
        "name": "Microsoft / Meta / Amazon",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named participants in the WEF digital-safety working group. Google is represented separately to preserve its other documented relationships.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named participants in the WEF digital-safety working group. Google is represented separately to preserve its other documented relationships."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named participants in the WEF digital-safety working group. Google is represented separately to preserve its other documented relationships.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are named participants. Google is shown separately. Shared policy development does not establish common ownership or interchangeable agendas.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e35"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named working-group participants",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft / Meta / Amazon",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits",
            "title": "Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result",
            "heading": "Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result",
            "text": "Microsoft AI's public draft is a proposed behavioral rulebook for its own MAI models, not every model Microsoft hosts. It is not yet used for training; a revised version is intended to guide development in 2027 onward.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d7d53c7030166fcbfeb55ca2cf09f5689f8a06c88d9f276dfc9a0a3c1aee8353"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits",
            "title": "Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result",
            "heading": "Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result",
            "text": "The consultation announcement reserves feedback decisions to the company's drafting team. The draft's hierarchy places company constraints above operator configurations and user preferences; specialized capabilities require separate Microsoft review.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "224a2b302393b300bbf34430007d62fa00f01495eb857d9168ccc7bc5811d617"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet owns the Coalition selection/authority lane. It does not determine Microsoft SDK/cloud terms or NCMEC hash access, which are separate lanes. No application, account, software execution, media, hash list, outreach or payment was attempted.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c416b7e76e935ec5c7741ccd00ec0fa13d52855bc0a6e68174db385701a1c977"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Shared markets and disputed rules",
            "text": "The coalitions are also less tidy than a division between startups and incumbents. On 1 November 2024 , Andreessen and Horowitz coauthored an AI policy statement with Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Brad Smith, explicitly proposing collaboration across small and large firms. The later OpenAI financing is another reason not to treat “Little Tech” as a permanent category of company size or a prohibition on incumbent alliances.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7fc6464c8112b0f3cd57638650d92e783e6901e618e81bbd5bfbdf60ab9d1305"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ofcom",
      "label": "Ofcom",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "The UK regulator responsible for communications and online-safety regulation, including guidance about age assurance and responses to online harms.",
      "aliases": [
        "Age ID",
        "age checks",
        "age verification",
        "Online Safety Act"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "UK communications regulator"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ofcom",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ofcom",
        "name": "Ofcom",
        "role": "UK communications regulator",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The UK regulator responsible for communications and online-safety regulation, including guidance about age assurance and responses to online harms.",
        "why": "It is a place where advocacy becomes—or fails to become—an operational rule. Consultation submissions can be compared directly with the regulator’s decisions.",
        "about": [
          "Ofcom accepted email-based age estimation as a method after considering technical evidence. Acceptance of a method is not certification of a vendor.",
          "Ofcom attributed a crisis notice-indicator amendment to Full Fact’s input, while declining to recommend specific monetisation practices in response to a Check My Ads request. These are examples of selective uptake, with different outcomes for different proposals."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Age ID",
          "age checks",
          "age verification",
          "Online Safety Act"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 37
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK regulator responsible for communications and online-safety regulation, including guidance about age assurance and responses to online harms.",
        "structuralRole": "The regulator translating UK duties into operational requirements",
        "significance": "Ofcom is a public authority with implementation and enforcement responsibilities. In this investigation it connects legislation to codes, age-assurance expectations, information requirements and compliance decisions affecting online services.",
        "background": [
          "Ofcom accepted email-based age estimation as a method after considering technical evidence. Acceptance of a method is not certification of a vendor.",
          "Ofcom attributed a crisis notice-indicator amendment to Full Fact’s input, while declining to recommend specific monetisation practices in response to a Check My Ads request. These are examples of selective uptake, with different outcomes for different proposals."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 20 update: Ofcom: a fine is not yet a collected penalty",
            "text": "In uncorrected September 15 testimony, Suzanne Cater described unpaid penalties and a limit on business-disruption applications after services comply. Witnesses asked for changes; those requests are not new powers. The promised collection figures and written follow-up remain outstanding in this scan.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom: uncorrected oral evidence, 15 September 2026",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/18091/html/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w51-ofcom-collection-limits"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraphs 3.350 to 3.353 decline the request from Yoti for mandatory independent certification. Providers can use their own, vendor or independent tests as evidence. Trust framework certification does not automatically establish compliance. The September 2026 vendor resource maintains this distinction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-certification-conditional"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "allows certification as evidence without making it mandatory or sufficient for",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025; FOI response of 26 August 2025; resource of 2 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swrequest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested clarification, transparency and conditional remedies",
            "sourceName": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraphs 3.251 to 3.259 retain a criteria-based approach despite proposed 95% and 99% thresholds, citing inadequate comparable evidence and testing, and innovation considerations. Future thresholds remain possible; the September 2026 resource does not itself impose one.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-thresholds-declined"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined proposed fixed numerical thresholds in initial guidance for",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025; currentness checked against the 2 September 2026 resource."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Volume3 2.19/fn11 identifies OSAN25-26;2.20-21 retains reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements and context-sensitive judgment, citing expression costs. It agrees criminal beyond-reasonable-doubt is not the test; this is no court judgment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-ofcom-declines-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined proposed interpretive departure",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "date": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom explicitly records CMA's revenue/refund request and declines to recommend specific monetization practices for the crisis protocol. Providers retain proportionate advertising-integrity choices; this does not decide CMA's other proposals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined to recommend specific monetization practices",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statement paragraphs 3.85 to 3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence; final Part 5 paragraph 4.17 includes the method. Capability depends on effective implementation. No approval of a named vendor or purchased service is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-email-accepted"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "added to methods capable of highly effective age assurance",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom recorded token submissions from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT and added references in guidance.A token is not itself an assurance method: underlying age check and sharing must satisfy HEAA, and the regulated service retains responsibility.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-tokens-disposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "added conditional references after token submissions",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
            "date": "January 2025 statement."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference",
            "heading": "What can be joined to Ofcom's drafting change",
            "text": "The accepted root operational note records Ofcom's statement 3.46–47/footnote29, PDF17, identifying Full Fact's response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on 4 August 2025 as inputs to questions about the interaction. Ofcom's resulting amendment says providers should consider an Ofcom public statement notice alongside their other indicators.",
            "matched": [
              "Ofcom"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5c0ba1df0a603025deb5199ed53ff56c77310dcb996946f5eeffa780f6c0d89b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference",
            "heading": "What can be joined to Ofcom's drafting change",
            "text": "The strongest rival to a direct ministerial-trigger lobbying account is that Ofcom resolved an interaction surfaced by differently framed stakeholder inputs. The remaining discriminating record is the 4 August2025 Ofcom/DSIT meeting note or drafting record showing what was asked, by whom, and how the final wording was chosen. Root owns that separate public search.",
            "matched": [
              "Ofcom"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "961cd889a8f0efbd29cac40fde0602b9a236e81aad79876da3c4abe5776b30be"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures",
            "heading": "Crisis: actual parliamentary step located, commencement still unverified",
            "text": "The accepted statement's cover date is 9 June; the current Ofcom roadmap and regulatory index call the crisis announcement/publication 18 June, while government records establish laying 18 June. These dates are retained as source-specific metadata and procedural events, not silently normalized into one date. This packet does not establish the reason for the publication-label difference.",
            "matched": [
              "Ofcom"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "72cde6a032457eed946392c123d799e994f538c0462e2c16960db03473bd0625"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions",
            "heading": "Authority and chronology boundaries for integration",
            "text": "The network is a submitter and advocate in these records. Woods and Walsh are named authors of the July response, not thereby statutory committee members or holders of regulatory approval rights. Targeted Ofcom searches did not establish a formal appointment for either; an unrelated result names Siobhan Walsh , not Maeve Walsh. This pass makes no claim that no formal role exists anywhere.",
            "matched": [
              "Ofcom"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "65370ddeec931a16483955a63dd229dedd4689e67abdb43f1fe5e104f4e68ff6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
          },
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom: uncorrected oral evidence, 15 September 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/18091/html/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          },
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          },
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin",
            "title": "The cited DSIT meeting and confirmed planning records"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-20",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Ofcom is the UK regulator implementing the Online Safety Act. It translates statutory duties into codes, guidance, information demands and enforcement, making consequential choices about age assurance, platform risk and crisis responses while considering proposals from campaigners and technology suppliers.",
          "structuralRole": "Turning online-safety law into operating requirements and enforcement",
          "significance": "Ofcom sits where advocacy meets enforceable obligations. Its published decisions show which demands become part of the regulatory framework, which are rejected, and how the resulting rules can affect access to online services and the use of personal information.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Ofcom is a public authority with the power to turn the UK's Online Safety Act into operational expectations for online services. Parliament supplies the statutory framework; the regulator issues guidance and codes, obtains information and enforces duties. That position makes its decisions more consequential than a campaign statement or a vendor's claim that its product solves a safety problem.",
            "Its January 2025 age-assurance decision shows the choices involved. Ofcom set criteria for accuracy, robustness, reliability and fairness. It added email-based age estimation to the methods capable of meeting the standard, expressly crediting evidence from the Age Verification Providers Association and VerifyMy. It also added conditional references to age tokens after submissions from 5Rights and others. These decisions can expand the set of tools a regulated business considers buying or building.",
            "The same decision rejected some requested requirements. Ofcom declined fixed numerical performance thresholds at that stage and rejected mandatory independent certification. It treated privacy as a duty already imposed by data-protection law, while strengthening design and data-minimization guidance. These are substantive choices about how much discretion remains with companies, assessors and other regulators. The agency also reported imposing a £700,000 age-assurance penalty and a separate £30,000 information penalty on the provider of Xgroovy.com in September 2026.",
            "Ofcom's remit reaches beyond age checks. Its crisis-response work addresses preparation, records and public accountability, while its non-consensual-intimate-image work has recommended StopNCII as one suitable option. Across these cases, the institution chooses how a broad legal obligation becomes a practical process. That is why the map repeatedly returns to Ofcom when tracing who ultimately sets the rules."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
            },
            {
              "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
            },
            {
              "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
            },
            {
              "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
            },
            {
              "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "nij",
      "label": "US National Institute of Justice",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Awarded NCOSE a sex-trafficking demand-reduction research grant; no gaming-campaign earmark shown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/nij",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "nij",
        "name": "US National Institute of Justice",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Awarded NCOSE a sex-trafficking demand-reduction research grant; no gaming-campaign earmark shown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Awarded NCOSE a sex-trafficking demand-reduction research grant; no gaming-campaign earmark shown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
            "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Awarded NCOSE a sex-trafficking demand-reduction research grant; no gaming-campaign earmark shown.",
        "structuralRole": "Government",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011, first awarded 2020, total funding to date US$239,946 and closed. Purpose: sex-trafficking demand-reduction research; not evidence of gaming-campaign funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e38"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
                "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCOSE",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "US$239,946 research award",
            "sourceName": "US National Institute of Justice",
            "targetName": "NCOSE",
            "date": "First award 2020; closed by 2026-09-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
            "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "jensen-project",
      "label": "The Jensen Project",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee; published purpose, no verified amount.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/jensen-project",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "jensen-project",
        "name": "The Jensen Project",
        "role": "Funder",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee; published purpose, no verified amount.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee; published purpose, no verified amount."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
            "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee; published purpose, no verified amount.",
        "structuralRole": "Funder",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Jensen identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee, describing law-centre work, survivor participation, research, convening and awareness. No independently verified amount or approval rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e39"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
                "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCOSE",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Policy grant support; amount unknown",
            "sourceName": "The Jensen Project",
            "targetName": "NCOSE",
            "date": "2021–2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
            "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pentecost",
      "label": "Pentecost family foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Own foundation page says it supports NCOSE; amount and contractual conditions were not verified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pentecost",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pentecost",
        "name": "Pentecost family foundation",
        "role": "Funder",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Own foundation page says it supports NCOSE; amount and contractual conditions were not verified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Own foundation page says it supports NCOSE; amount and contractual conditions were not verified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
            "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Own foundation page says it supports NCOSE; amount and contractual conditions were not verified.",
        "structuralRole": "Funder",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Family foundation page says it supports NCOSE. Secondary dollar figures were not inspected in primary returns and are excluded; no current board/control inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e40"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
                "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCOSE",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named philanthropic support",
            "sourceName": "Pentecost family foundation",
            "targetName": "NCOSE",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
            "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "message-scanning-proposal",
      "label": "All-user message scanning proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Collective Shout proposed scanning all Australian users on relevant services admitting under-18s for specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material; not enacted or deployed evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/message-scanning-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "message-scanning-proposal",
        "name": "All-user message scanning proposal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Collective Shout proposed scanning all Australian users on relevant services admitting under-18s for specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material; not enacted or deployed evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Collective Shout proposed scanning all Australian users on relevant services admitting under-18s for specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material; not enacted or deployed evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
            "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Collective Shout proposed scanning all Australian users on relevant services admitting under-18s for specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material; not enacted or deployed evidence.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "November 2024 submission pp13–14 proposes that relevant services admitting under-18s scan all Australian users' messages and remove specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material. This is the organisation's affirmative answer; proposal only, not enactment or actual deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e41"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
                "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collective Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocated message scanning in its submission",
            "sourceName": "Collective Shout",
            "targetName": "All-user message scanning proposal",
            "date": "2024-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
            "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lightcone",
      "label": "Lightcone Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A Nevada charity that appears in the Future of Life Institute’s accounts as a major related source of resources.",
      "aliases": [
        "Light Cone"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Charitable funding organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/lightcone",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "lightcone",
        "name": "Lightcone Foundation",
        "role": "Charitable funding organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A Nevada charity that appears in the Future of Life Institute’s accounts as a major related source of resources.",
        "why": "FLI’s 2025 audit records $45.20 million in grants from this foundation. Understanding the relationship requires following actual transfers and governance, not just the size of a balance sheet.",
        "about": [
          "The charity’s US tax identifier is 92-0636259. It is a different organisation from Lightcone Infrastructure, which is associated with LessWrong.",
          "Earlier transfers between affiliated organisations include noncash investments. Moving assets between related bodies does not mean a second independent donor gave the same amount."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Light Cone"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A Nevada charity that appears in the Future of Life Institute’s accounts as a major related source of resources.",
        "structuralRole": "A related foundation in FLI’s financial structure",
        "significance": "This Lightcone Foundation is a significant part of FLI’s asset and grant structure. Following transfers between the two helps distinguish the origin of wealth, its custody and its later use. The similarly named Lightcone Infrastructure is a different organisation.",
        "background": [
          "The charity’s US tax identifier is 92-0636259. It is a different organisation from Lightcone Infrastructure, which is associated with LessWrong.",
          "Earlier transfers between affiliated organisations include noncash investments. Moving assets between related bodies does not mean a second independent donor gave the same amount."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation Financial details: value: 45,197,838; currency: USD; kind: grant receipt; period: FY2025 What remains unestablished: Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-lightcone25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "related party grant received",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "FY2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-lightcone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Related-entity contribution of noncash investments in 2024; not new independent external fundraising.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e45"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$21.05m noncash contribution",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$162,587,667 cash/public-securities fair value, related-entity transfer. Not campaign spending.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e44"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$162.59m asset transfer",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "date": "2022-12-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e49"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Tegmark",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority",
            "text": "The original question remains important. The retained record shows substantial organised resources behind AI advocacy and several concrete routes into creator production. FLI's 2025 standalone audit reports US$45,197,838 in grants from Lightcone Foundation . Earlier transfers involving Lightcone Foundation and Future of Life Europe concern assets and organisational allocation; they cannot be added together as annual persuasion expenditure. Lightcone Foundation is also a different entity from Lightcone Infrastructure. Scale is real, but the accounting categories matter. A1",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c0f68fd14a1caac6ff98cb29cc3e2d30cce29f8aea37c9e57ad9108edeb11097"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
            "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Lightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259 https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "61cad60a06892a2982576f8340d809a1818a23098aa338e6271c4ac8b82fc991"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1.",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d1b431f17e7544aad3669a7c756aef5b981796db1d2d6df3a90af8359974ab60"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Findings that change the story",
            "text": "The strongest financial finding is a related-endowment loop. FLI's 2022 IRS return reports a USD 162,587,667 transfer of cash/public securities to Lightcone Foundation, alongside USD 180,297,079 in cash/financial assets to FLI Europe and USD 25,025,000 cash to Future of Life Foundation. FLI's 2024 return then identifies Lightcone as a USD 21,050,000 contributor. This is 99.590% of FLI's USD 21,136,620 contributions that year (own calculation). The matching USD 21.05m appears in the audited cashflow as noncash investment contributions. Thus the large 2024 contribution is evidence of funding from an affiliated holding/grantmaking entity, not evidence of USD 21m newly raised from an independent outside donor. FLI-alone assets fell after asset transfers; do not call that disappearance or expenditure on persuasion. S1-S3.",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "502e2583015bab7f677e8e6382da3bad42f8ce1bca20f0105182385d1141485d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Lightcone Foundation is a Nevada charity within the Future of Life Institute’s financial network, with US tax identifier 92-0636259. It holds and transfers substantial resources associated with FLI. It is separate from Lightcone Infrastructure, the organization operating LessWrong and Lighthaven.",
          "structuralRole": "Holds and supplies resources within FLI’s financial structure",
          "significance": "This foundation matters because the capacity behind public advocacy has a financial home. Following its assets and grants shows how resources are organized before they support the work of a visible campaigning institution.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Lightcone Foundation appears in FLI’s accounts as a related organization and a major source of grants. It is the quieter institutional side of a highly public debate: a legal charity holding resources, participating in related governance arrangements and transferring value to support another organization’s operations.",
            "FLI’s 2022 tax return records a December transfer of about $162.59 million in cash and public securities to Lightcone Foundation. The 2024 return records a $21.05 million contribution of noncash investments back to FLI. Its 2025 audited statements then report $45,197,838 in Lightcone grants. The dates and forms of these transactions show resources being reorganized and used over several years.",
            "The audit also identifies overlapping board service, while the wider FLI records describe shared administrative arrangements among related bodies. These relationships make the foundation important to understanding the institution’s financial staying power. A public campaign can be much more durable when resources and administrative support are organized beyond the most visible operating nonprofit.",
            "The useful question here is how the holding and grantmaking structure supports FLI’s work and who governs those decisions. Readers following LessWrong or the Lighthaven campus should instead open Lightcone Infrastructure: its property financing and community operations belong to a different legal organization. Keeping the two profiles clear allows both financial stories to become intelligible."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
              "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
              "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
              "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
              "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "vitalik",
      "label": "Vitalik Buterin",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "An Ethereum co-founder whose 2021 SHIB-token support helped finance Future of Life Institute work.",
      "aliases": [
        "Vitalek",
        "Vitalik",
        "Ethereum",
        "SHIB"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Ethereum co-founder & donor"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/vitalik",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "vitalik",
        "name": "Vitalik Buterin",
        "role": "Ethereum co-founder & donor",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An Ethereum co-founder whose 2021 SHIB-token support helped finance Future of Life Institute work.",
        "why": "This is a documented route from cryptocurrency wealth into AI-risk philanthropy. It does not by itself establish an AI-versus-crypto business strategy.",
        "about": [
          "FLI’s 2021 announcement confirms the support. The announced $25 million grant programme was a programme allocation, not an established total value of Buterin’s gift. FLI describes the gift as unconditional and says it conveyed no decision-making role."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Vitalek",
          "Vitalik",
          "Ethereum",
          "SHIB"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI current finance page",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
            "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An Ethereum co-founder whose 2021 SHIB-token support helped finance Future of Life Institute work.",
        "structuralRole": "An upstream donor with a recorded strategic disagreement",
        "significance": "Buterin’s support helps explain part of the resource history behind FLI. The retained record also contains a later reported disagreement about strategy. That combination matters: a donor relationship can coexist with a dispute over how an institution develops.",
        "background": [
          "FLI’s 2021 announcement confirms the support. The announced $25 million grant programme was a programme allocation, not an established total value of Buterin’s gift. FLI describes the gift as unconditional and says it conveyed no decision-making role."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Primary FLI announcement confirms Buterin/SHIB support. $25m was a grant-program envelope, not the total donation. FLI describes the gift as unconditional and says no decision role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e42"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI current finance page",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2021 support; total not established",
            "sourceName": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2021"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Vitalik Buterin → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $5,411,216; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March 2026 reporting carries Buterin's criticism of later cultural/political advocacy and FLI's reply. Primary X post inaccessible in the original investigation; no liquidation ledger verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e43"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
                "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported disagreement over later strategy",
            "sourceName": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2026-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-vitalik-followup",
            "title": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "CoinDesk's March13 2026 report describes unsolicited SHIB tokens and Buterin's account that FLI realized roughly$500m, far beyond his expected$10–25m. These are attributed retrospective estimates, not independently reconciled liquidation proceeds. Its headline's billion-dollar figure covers wider philanthropy, not FLI alone. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest",
            "matched": [
              "Vitalik",
              "SHIB",
              "Buterin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9bc02850b36b3c6492fb4935161085cefc38fdc538903249ca498ab487b22f7c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-vitalik-followup",
            "title": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Cointelegraph's March13 report, updatedMarch16 with FLI comment, describes Buterin's criticism of a turn toward political/cultural action and his concern about authoritarian, fragile outcomes. Aguirre emphasized shared aims and continuing technical work. The original X post was not readable through the web tool; the criticism is retained as attributed reporting, not direct-source access. https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation",
            "matched": [
              "Vitalik",
              "SHIB",
              "Buterin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "19aeed5048e6c21a06f68cb915229b39cb0e2fa7062ac5deb60af5e11a36ece0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The institution and the money",
            "text": "MIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years. MIRI's contributor list",
            "matched": [
              "Vitalik Buterin",
              "Vitalik",
              "Buterin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "31932d145918d27ecc0b5cd2684e6cef3ccf4338228a00a73c1806d4fedaba10"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Findings that change the story",
            "text": "The donor association does not by itself establish donor control. FLI describes Vitalik Buterin as by far its largest donor and the 2021 gift as unconditional; it says he has no formal or informal decision role, and makes Jaan Tallinn, a longstanding director, the exception to its donor-influence disclaimer. In March 2026 Buterin publicly criticized the later shift toward cultural/political action. His X post could not be read directly (403), so the roughly USD 500m SHIB liquidation figure and disagreement remain a donor account carried in reporting, not a verified liquidation ledger. Cointelegraph also carries Anthony Aguirre's reply emphasizing shared goals and continuing work on coordination, epistemics and technical safeguards. S8, S15. FLI's contemporaneous June 2021 announcement corroborates Buterin/Shiba Inu support and a USD 25m multiyear grant PROGRAM; that is not the total donation. S9.",
            "matched": [
              "Vitalik Buterin",
              "Vitalik",
              "SHIB",
              "Buterin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8d146ec3a8acc4984af10688eb6a123251fc824dc5c21b33105cc71ee1dc45d3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI current finance page",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
            "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "tegmark",
      "label": "Max Tegmark",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A physicist and co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, identified as its chair in the biography examined in September 2026.",
      "aliases": [
        "Max Erik Tegmark"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Physicist & FLI co-founder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/tegmark",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "tegmark",
        "name": "Max Tegmark",
        "role": "Physicist & FLI co-founder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A physicist and co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, identified as its chair in the biography examined in September 2026.",
        "why": "He connects scientific authority, public AI advocacy and the governance of organisations holding substantial resources.",
        "about": [
          "The investigation found an overlap between FLI and Lightcone Foundation governance in 2024. That is a concrete institutional connection. It does not establish that every recipient or partner acts on Tegmark’s instructions."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Max Erik Tegmark"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A physicist and co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, identified as its chair in the biography examined in September 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "Research authority and nonprofit governance",
        "significance": "Tegmark connects scientific prominence with FLI’s organisational leadership and related governance records. Those roles help explain both the public authority of the campaign’s arguments and the institutions through which resources are organised.",
        "background": [
          "The investigation found an overlap between FLI and Lightcone Foundation governance in 2024. That is a concrete institutional connection. It does not establish that every recipient or partner acts on Tegmark’s instructions."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access to Sanders’s policy discussions",
            "text": "Tegmark participated in Sanders’s April 29 AI panel, according to contemporary reporting. FLI’s current roster names him Founder and Chair. His participation does not establish FLI authorship or financing of September’s proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Our people",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e48"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "FLI's current roster names Max Tegmark Founder and Chair.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-015"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our people",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder and Chair",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-board-tegmark"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Max Tegmark as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-006"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e49"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios identifies Tegmark among planned expert participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-011"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
            "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Tegmark's February2 2026 Canadian parliamentary appearance supplies direct evidence of advocacy for mandatory safety testing while favoring beneficial AI tools. Other empirical claims in that testimony were not validated by this follow-up; testimony proves what a witness argued, not the accuracy of every assertion. https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/451/ETHI/Evidence/EV13876654/ETHIEV25-E.PDF",
            "matched": [
              "Tegmark"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d839ade0bdd89c2de111df30d6fdcb5ae1d2e1b8ed4ddee1afc654f98ed5644b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
            "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Tegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI's current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization's current position, not an independently established technical conclusion or a ban on all AI. https://futureoflife.org/person/max-tegmark/ https://futureoflife.org/our-position-on-ai/",
            "matched": [
              "Tegmark"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b340fa0abdd5459f46657885a9cc298f05a64f3d8d3e555c5e6a0586225c5b89"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI: Future of Life Institute, EIN 47-1052538, Pennsylvania legal domicile, formed 2014, section 501(c)(3). The 2024 return reports five voting board members, two independent, 29 employees. It identifies Anthony N Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn and Viktoriya Krakovna as directors/officers. Current website presents the same five under current names/roles: Anthony Aguirre (President and CEO), Jaan Tallinn (director), Max Tegmark (Founder and Chair), Meia Chita-Tegmark (Board Secretary), Victoria Krakovna (director). These are different date states, not contradictory office labels. S1, S11.",
            "matched": [
              "Max Tegmark",
              "Tegmark"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "47558c834c5f701982a3b99fae4428753eaad51bfd2313c425755e60cafebf2f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "No donation bridge established in the checked records",
            "text": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
            "matched": [
              "Tegmark"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc189d3ac5523c7bc4a84efe32b4e5e02df52dba938fee8930ecfeba748a5221"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Our people",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Max Tegmark is a physicist and co-founder of the Future of Life Institute, identified by FLI as its founder and chair. He brings scientific prominence to AI-risk advocacy and holds institutional roles that connect public arguments, philanthropic governance and access to political audiences.",
          "structuralRole": "Scientific prominence joined to organizational leadership and policy access",
          "significance": "Tegmark is significant because he participates in the institutions behind the message as well as delivering it. His chairmanship, related governance records and political appearances connect credibility, resources and advocacy in tangible ways.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Tegmark’s public role in AI risk is anchored in the Future of Life Institute, which identifies him as founder and chair. FLI combines catastrophic-risk research, policy work and public communication. Its institutional resources allow that work to continue across news cycles, with Tegmark’s scientific reputation helping bring the questions before broader audiences.",
            "The financial and corporate records put him inside the organizational structure too. The investigation found overlapping board or officer service between FLI and Lightcone Foundation in the 2024 filings, alongside a foundation-board role in FLI Europe’s founding notice. These records help explain how a family of organizations holding substantial resources is governed. Lightcone Foundation’s grants are a major component of FLI’s reported 2025 finances.",
            "His political access is also visible. Contemporary reporting places him at Bernie Sanders’s April 29 AI panel, which brought Chinese and American computer scientists into a discussion of AI threats. That appearance sits within a broader field in which FLI, MIRI and ControlAI seek to make catastrophic-risk arguments central to public decisions about development.",
            "Tegmark’s importance is thus both communicative and institutional. A scientist speaking about a risk can attract attention; a chair working through a staffed and funded organization can help sustain research, convene discussion and advance a policy agenda. The network becomes easier to understand when those capacities are seen together and tied to the actual organizations through which he works."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Our people",
              "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
              "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
              "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
              "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
            },
            {
              "title": "Contemporary report of Sanders’s April 29 AI panel",
              "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "aguirre",
      "label": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "FLI president/CEO; overlapping Lightcone officer record.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/aguirre",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "aguirre",
        "name": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI president/CEO; overlapping Lightcone officer record.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FLI president/CEO; overlapping Lightcone officer record."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre is an FLI leader whose recorded board or officer service overlaps with Lightcone Foundation and FLI Europe. These roles place him within governance of organisations connected by substantial related-entity transactions.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared leadership across asset and operating organisations",
        "significance": "The officer and foundation records identify formal governance relationships, giving concrete reasons to examine which decisions each board makes and how transactions are authorised.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded governance roles",
            "text": "The 2024 FLI filing and IRS-derived Lightcone officer record establish overlapping service. FLI Europe’s Swiss record names him as a board member with joint signature by two. That arrangement does not establish unilateral grant approval, appointment rights or a chain of command across all three bodies. Full Lightcone schedules and governing instruments would be needed for those stronger claims.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
              },
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e50",
              "e51",
              "w2-fli-e-board-aguirre"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "An alternative cited in the ban debate",
            "text": "Gary Marcus favors an Aguirre formulation permitting narrow tools and independent high-assurance approval for more general systems. This records Marcus’s use of an idea, not Aguirre endorsement of the Sanders–Casar bill.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
                "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Marcus's postscript endorsed an Anthony Aguirre formulation allowing narrow tools and conditional development under independent high-assurance review.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
                "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gary Marcus",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly favors alternative wording",
            "sourceName": "Gary Marcus",
            "targetName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e50"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "FLI executive identified as coalition co-founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-aguirre-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-board-aguirre"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
            "sourceName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e51"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Most consequential findings",
            "text": "A September 2022 policy panel hosted by the Center for Data Innovation places him beside FLI's Anthony Aguirre, DeepMind's Alexandra Belias, Hugging Face's Irene Solaiman, and Kai Zenner, then head of office and digital policy adviser to MEP Axel Voss. It is a concrete earlier point of contact with the FLI and European policy worlds. It establishes coappearance, not an alliance or payment. [M01]",
            "matched": [
              "Aguirre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e38607b332202c3138fc6edc30e28b14a291c8391448c1a1bd1399c8f81fd40b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-vitalik-followup",
            "title": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Cointelegraph's March13 report, updatedMarch16 with FLI comment, describes Buterin's criticism of a turn toward political/cultural action and his concern about authoritarian, fragile outcomes. Aguirre emphasized shared aims and continuing technical work. The original X post was not readable through the web tool; the criticism is retained as attributed reporting, not direct-source access. https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation",
            "matched": [
              "Aguirre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "19aeed5048e6c21a06f68cb915229b39cb0e2fa7062ac5deb60af5e11a36ece0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Conflict remains visible",
            "text": "ITIF publicly opposed the Sanders–Casar prohibition, emphasizing innovation and competition. Gary Marcus also opposed its breadth while arguing for regulation; he favored an alternative formulation by Anthony Aguirre. Casar’s office meanwhile reports actual correspondence demanding security records from OpenAI and Anthropic. The record contains disagreement among regulators’ advocates and conflict between lawmakers and companies. Treating all of them as one camp would erase useful evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Aguirre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8bb4dcfe288625df7362600f2b0348d20465e4d758118803b33ec8ff8293075a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
            "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Lightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259 https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation",
            "matched": [
              "Aguirre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "61cad60a06892a2982576f8340d809a1818a23098aa338e6271c4ac8b82fc991"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
            "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
          },
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "chita",
      "label": "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "FLI board secretary; filed name Mihaela Chita-Tegmark.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/chita",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "chita",
        "name": "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI board secretary; filed name Mihaela Chita-Tegmark.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FLI board secretary; filed name Mihaela Chita-Tegmark."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark is recorded in FLI’s board and officer structure, with overlapping service at Lightcone Foundation and membership of FLI Europe’s board. The filings make her a formal governance connection within the related-entity network.",
        "structuralRole": "Overlapping officer service across related foundations",
        "significance": "Her relevance rests on institutional roles rather than personal association. These matter when tracing responsibility for organisations holding assets or sharing operations, but the authority of each office depends on its governing documents.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The 2024 FLI and IRS-derived Lightcone records identify board or officer service. FLI Europe’s Swiss registration records joint signature by two. Her participation thus crosses the US and Swiss entities. This does not establish individual approval of every transfer or grant, or that the organisations are one legal body. Full schedules, minutes and foundation instruments would resolve those decision rights.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
              },
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e52",
              "e53",
              "w2-fli-e-board-chita"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e52"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-board-chita"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
            "sourceName": "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e53"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Board / officer service",
            "sourceName": "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
            "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Lightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259 https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation",
            "matched": [
              "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
              "Chita-Tegmark"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "61cad60a06892a2982576f8340d809a1818a23098aa338e6271c4ac8b82fc991"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI: Future of Life Institute, EIN 47-1052538, Pennsylvania legal domicile, formed 2014, section 501(c)(3). The 2024 return reports five voting board members, two independent, 29 employees. It identifies Anthony N Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn and Viktoriya Krakovna as directors/officers. Current website presents the same five under current names/roles: Anthony Aguirre (President and CEO), Jaan Tallinn (director), Max Tegmark (Founder and Chair), Meia Chita-Tegmark (Board Secretary), Victoria Krakovna (director). These are different date states, not contradictory office labels. S1, S11.",
            "matched": [
              "Mihaela Chita-Tegmark",
              "Chita-Tegmark"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "47558c834c5f701982a3b99fae4428753eaad51bfd2313c425755e60cafebf2f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "tallinn",
      "label": "Jaan Tallinn",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "FLI and CAIS board bridge. Former DeepMind investor-director.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/tallinn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "tallinn",
        "name": "Jaan Tallinn",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI and CAIS board bridge. Former DeepMind investor-director.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FLI and CAIS board bridge. Former DeepMind investor-director."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Skype co-founder, investor and philanthropist whose funding connects AI laboratories, grantmaking, policy organizations, media and community infrastructure.",
        "structuralRole": "Capital and grant-allocation keystone",
        "significance": "His significance is the variety of concrete roles: donor, investor, board member and participant in allocation decisions. Each conveys different powers and obligations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Which connections are recorded",
            "text": "The FLI biography identifies FLI and CAIS board service and the former DeepMind relationship. The Swiss record gives him joint-signature-by-two authority at FLI Europe. An SFF 2023H2 table names Tallinn as the source of an USD11,000 general-support recommendation to TFS. A recommendation is not proof of payment, and historical DeepMind involvement does not establish a company transfer to the later red-lines campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              },
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e54",
              "e55",
              "e56",
              "w2-fli-e-board-tallinn",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-tallinn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Direct support for ControlAI",
            "text": "Tallinn reports £500,000 to Secure Future Research on 14 November 2023 and £2m on 10 April 2024. Company 15088415 became CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026. The donations are historical and have not been allocated to a specific campaign or creator.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A role in allocation",
            "text": "SFF describes Tallinn’s ability to set deference weights for recommenders and make final funding adjustments. SFC calls him its primary client but describes its own separate ownership and discretion. Grant recommendations and actual payments are different records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
              },
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Institutions and commercial stakes",
            "text": "FLI identifies Tallinn as a co-founder and board member; its financial-transparency page explicitly distinguishes that role when discussing donor influence. Anthropic says he led its $124m round in 2021; this is the total round, not his personal cheque. Metaplanet’s portfolio includes Conjecture.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI: Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI financial transparency",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems"
              },
              {
                "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
                "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Media, policy and organizing",
            "text": "His ledger records designated support for AISTOF, AIPI, CLTR, PauseAI and Tarbell. Those recipients occupy different functions. AISTOF is pooled; its documentary and Frame support cannot be traced dollar-for-dollar to Tallinn. PauseAI itself describes coordinating public pressure alongside policy organizations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              },
              {
                "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Credit creates another obligation",
            "text": "Lightcone describes a $20m Slimrock property loan and, separately, a 2025 settlement advance that reduces future disbursements. Those are stronger evidence of specific obligations than a shared donor name alone. The executed instruments remain missing.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "New evidence and its limits",
            "text": "Frame recipient page lists Jaan Tallin (DAF), USD 20,000, under Grants Received. Preserve original spelling and the unnamed DAF limitation; context supports intended Tallinn identity.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons participation",
            "text": "The platform lists a tentative $10m first-round contribution from Tallinn, conditional on $10m from other funders. Commons gives donors choices over evaluators and final allocations; it is a new link alongside the historical SFF and Lightcone relationships already in this profile.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-tallinn-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Jaan Tallinn → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $1,631,447; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-tallinn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer. Financial details: value: 11,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-tallinn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2023H2"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger contains five payments associated with the Center for AI Safety Action Fund totaling $3,221,000 during 2023–2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-caisaction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$3.221m across five 2023–2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Four donor-ledger payments via Founders Pledge UK designate APPG for Future Generations and total $251,000 during 2020–2022.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-appg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "APPG for Future Generations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$251,000 designated support, 2020–2022",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "APPG for Future Generations",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "FLI identifies Tallinn as a co-founder and board member and distinguishes that role in its donor-influence disclosure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-fli-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI: Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI financial transparency",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder and board member",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports two 2024 payments through Players Philanthropy Fund for Tarbell Fellowship totaling $520,000.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-tarbell"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$520,000 programme support in 2024",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports three July–August 2024 payments through Manifold for Charity for PauseAI USA totaling $60,000.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-pauseus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI US",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$60,000 across three 2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "PauseAI US",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn records $786,994 via SFF to Vanguard Charitable for account A2003126, AISTOF, on 27 November 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-aitof"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$786,994 designated contribution, 2024",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "Jaan Tallinn's public records connect his philanthropy to several functions in AI politics: allocating grants, developing policy, organizing public pressure, producing media, and financing places where the community works. Some participants explicitly describe how those functions complement one another. The evidence supports examining the arrangements that sustain this ecosystem. It does not establish a single command structure. The captured donation ledger contains entries through 31 March 2025, so its historical payments cannot be presented as a complete account of current funding.",
            "matched": [
              "Jaan Tallinn",
              "Tallinn"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9e6576da4d2a3d71a007f8d097ee60636846527a3eefb67bb15a428140d7473f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "One new Tallinn/Frame funding result",
            "text": "This adds recipient-reported direct Tallinn support beyond the earlier upstream Vanguard/AISTOF record without tracing those pooled dollars into any particular creator. Selection rights and grant conditions remain the next decisive documents.",
            "matched": [
              "Tallinn"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "13f1d74deca3ce6ca103fe89e1c56aab04b58b59f4c18427491c8a40b861ecd6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "The fund's Manifund account records $41,162 for Michaël Trazzi's SB-1047 documentary. The project's Donations tab dates the AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025 and marks the project Complete Grant. This establishes media financing; the proposal describes informing AI-policy discussions while presenting proponents and opponents. It does not trace Tallinn's November contribution into this production or establish editorial approval rights. The meaningful connection is fund-level support for communication, with grant-specific conditions still unknown.",
            "matched": [
              "Tallinn"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc517d083c8be5375a87b06775ae1f4847e9b62ce89dc1b68783e8ef14da915b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "One new Tallinn/Frame funding result",
            "text": "Frame's public grantmaking.ai profile has an organization-edited “Grants Received” block updated July 13, 2026 . It reports “Jaan Tallin (DAF)” $20,000 , AISTOF/Jueyan Zhang $280,000 , and another AISTOF entry with amount hidden. Preserve the donor spelling in source data; the intended Tallinn identity is strongly supported by context but the specific DAF is unnamed. Akshyae Singh's public reply says the $280,000 was for Cohort 1.0. The profile names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes Frame selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. These are recipient-side disclosures, not bank receipts, grant contracts, precise payment dates, or evidence of a donor selection veto. Do not infer the hidden amount or collapse the two AISTOF records into a known total.",
            "matched": [
              "Tallinn"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "67f40a90af1ff54e2e58f03b19b2cd0192df7fcf58c8a70f41926080eb6fa836"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI financial transparency",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems"
          },
          {
            "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
            "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio"
          },
          {
            "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Technology entrepreneur and philanthropic backer of multiple AI-risk institutions and grantmaking channels.",
          "structuralRole": "Donor and funding-system sponsor",
          "significance": "His capital supports organizations and mechanisms that decide where further capital goes.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Tallinn’s public donor ledger makes a substantial part of his philanthropy traceable. It reports £500,000 to Secure Future Research in November 2023 and £2 million in April 2024; that company is now named CONTROLAI. Other entries support CAIS Action Fund, the AI Policy Institute, the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, PauseAI, Tarbell and creator-related funding. These recipients perform different jobs within the wider AI debate.",
            "He also participates in deciding where resources go. SFF’s 2025 process describes Tallinn setting the weight given to recommenders and making final funding adjustments. The separate Survival and Flourishing Corp. identifies him as its primary client. FLI lists him as co-founder and board member and explicitly recognizes that board role when explaining how donor influence works. These are concrete forms of institutional leverage.",
            "His commercial connections cross the supposed divide between AI builders and their critics. Anthropic says Tallinn led its $124 million financing round in 2021; that figure is the total round. His investment vehicle Metaplanet lists Conjecture. The same person can therefore support model development, technical safety and political restriction through different organizations.",
            "Infrastructure adds another kind of obligation. Lightcone Infrastructure reported a $20 million property loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments and later described a separate arrangement advancing support against future grant recommendations after an FTX settlement. Taken together, the records explain his keystone position: money reaches a broad field through investments, donations, allocation processes and loans, each with its own practical consequences.",
            "The platform lists a tentative $10m first-round contribution from Tallinn, conditional on $10m from other funders. Commons gives donors choices over evaluators and final allocations; it is a new link alongside the historical SFF and Lightcone relationships already in this profile."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
              "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
              "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
            },
            {
              "title": "FLI current finance page",
              "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
              "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems"
            },
            {
              "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
              "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
            },
            {
              "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
              "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-19"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "flieurope",
      "label": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Related Swiss entity; recipient of 2022 asset transfer.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/flieurope",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "flieurope",
        "name": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Related Swiss entity; recipient of 2022 asset transfer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Related Swiss entity; recipient of 2022 asset transfer."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 10
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Future of Life Institute Europe is a Swiss foundation related to the US Future of Life Institute. It received USD180,297,079 of cash and financial assets from FLI on 30 December 2022, making it a substantial asset holder within this network.",
        "structuralRole": "A major related asset holder with overlapping governance",
        "significance": "The transfer and the named board give concrete reasons to examine its grant decisions and governing deed. The asset allocation itself is not evidence that the whole sum was spent on persuasion.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who can act for the foundation",
            "text": "The Swiss record lists Jaan Tallinn, Anthony Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn and Max Tegmark as board members with joint signature by two. ECHO SA is the appointed auditor and federal foundation supervision is recorded. The register references a reserved purpose-modification right under Article 86a, but the founder and operative deed conditions were not recovered. A two-signature rule identifies how authorised acts are executed; it does not reveal who appoints directors or approves particular grants.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              },
              {
                "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
                "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e46",
              "w2-fli-e-board-tallinn",
              "w2-fli-e-board-aguirre",
              "w2-fli-e-board-chita",
              "w2-fli-e-board-fihn",
              "w2-fli-e-board-tegmark",
              "w2-fli-e-echo",
              "w2-fli-e-supervision",
              "w2-fli-e-reservation",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flieurope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$180,297,079 cash/financial assets; related-entity allocation, not independent persuasion spending. Financial details: value: 180,297,079; currency: USD; kind: asset transfer FMV; period: 2022-12-30",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e46"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$180.30m asset transfer",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "2022-12-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flieurope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No inference of government financing or policy direction What remains unestablished: No inference of government financing or policy direction",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-supervision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
                "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Swiss Federal Department of Home Affairs, foundation supervision",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supervises foundation",
            "sourceName": "Swiss Federal Department of Home Affairs, foundation supervision",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "2022-07-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power What remains unestablished: Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-reservation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI Europe founder named in unrecovered deed",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reserved purpose modification right mentioned",
            "sourceName": "FLI Europe founder named in unrecovered deed",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-board-aguirre"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
            "sourceName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Appointed auditor. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-echo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECHO SA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "appointed auditor",
            "sourceName": "ECHO SA",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1.",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Institute Europe"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d1b431f17e7544aad3669a7c756aef5b981796db1d2d6df3a90af8359974ab60"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "flfoundation",
      "label": "Future of Life Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Separate charity EIN 88-0926067; related-entity transactions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/flfoundation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "flfoundation",
        "name": "Future of Life Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Separate charity EIN 88-0926067; related-entity transactions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate charity EIN 88-0926067; related-entity transactions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Future of Life Foundation is a separate US charity, EIN 88-0926067, related to the Future of Life Institute. FLI’s filings record a USD25.025 million cash transfer to it in 2022, followed by expense-sharing and reimbursement relationships.",
        "structuralRole": "A related financial and operating organisation",
        "significance": "The foundation matters as both a substantial asset recipient and a participant in shared administration. Following those functions separately avoids turning internal allocations and reimbursements into multiple independent donations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Assets, shared expenses and balances",
            "text": "FLI’s 2024 Schedule R records USD286,738 of expense reimbursement and a separate USD400,365 employee-sharing figure. The 2025 audit reports USD959,308 due to FLI under cost sharing and USD430,343 payable by FLI for consulting costs. These year-end balances are not new cash payments. The audit describes overlapping executive-director board service, and FLI’s amended purpose names support of the foundation. These show related operations, while leaving detailed appointment rights and a simple parent–subsidiary interpretation unsettled.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e47",
              "e57",
              "w2-fli-e-flf-receivable",
              "w2-fli-e-flf-payable",
              "w2-fli-e-supporting",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flfoundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Year end amount due under cost sharing. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied. Financial details: value: 959,308; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-flf-receivable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "year end amount due under cost sharing",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Year end amount due for consulting costs. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied. Financial details: value: 430,343; currency: USD; kind: payable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-flf-payable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "year end amount due for consulting costs",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree What remains unestablished: Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-supporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "amended purpose supports",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "FY2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flfoundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 Schedule R amount; not a donation. Employee-sharing involved $400,365 separately, not additive new fundraising.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e57"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$286,738 expense reimbursement",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Related-entity transfer recorded in 2022 Schedule N.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e47"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$25.025m cash transfer",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "2022-12-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
            "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Impala's separate Mission Statement field reproduces: “TO SUPPORTING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF THE FUTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION, PRIMARILY VIA GRANTMAKING.” This is an aggregator's tax-data reproduction, not a directly recovered charter. It names Future of Life FOUNDATION (FLF, EIN88-0926067). Impala has an AI-generated summary nearby and inconsistent fiscal-year labels; do not rely on its summary for new transaction amounts. https://impala.digital/public/profiles/92-0636259/overview",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e037d55912c840577cc9227816bc96aabe759380c547d06ee0e82a8d46528b4e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1.",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d1b431f17e7544aad3669a7c756aef5b981796db1d2d6df3a90af8359974ab60"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Findings that change the story",
            "text": "The strongest financial finding is a related-endowment loop. FLI's 2022 IRS return reports a USD 162,587,667 transfer of cash/public securities to Lightcone Foundation, alongside USD 180,297,079 in cash/financial assets to FLI Europe and USD 25,025,000 cash to Future of Life Foundation. FLI's 2024 return then identifies Lightcone as a USD 21,050,000 contributor. This is 99.590% of FLI's USD 21,136,620 contributions that year (own calculation). The matching USD 21.05m appears in the audited cashflow as noncash investment contributions. Thus the large 2024 contribution is evidence of funding from an affiliated holding/grantmaking entity, not evidence of USD 21m newly raised from an independent outside donor. FLI-alone assets fell after asset transfers; do not call that disappearance or expenditure on persuasion. S1-S3.",
            "matched": [
              "Future of Life Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "502e2583015bab7f677e8e6382da3bad42f8ce1bca20f0105182385d1141485d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "baif",
      "label": "Beneficial AI Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Related charity EIN 88-4400777; employee-sharing and reimbursement disclosed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/baif",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "baif",
        "name": "Beneficial AI Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Related charity EIN 88-4400777; employee-sharing and reimbursement disclosed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Related charity EIN 88-4400777; employee-sharing and reimbursement disclosed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Beneficial AI Foundation is a separate related charity, EIN 88-4400777, appearing in FLI’s shared-expense and payroll arrangements. These records concern operational reimbursements and balances rather than an independently traced public campaign.",
        "structuralRole": "A participant in shared staffing and operating costs",
        "significance": "The foundation reveals how related organisations draw on common administrative capacity. The mechanism is who initially pays, who benefits from the work and who owes reimbursement, rather than a new donation for every accounting line.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The amounts and their meaning",
            "text": "FLI’s 2024 Schedule R reports a USD73,577 expense reimbursement and separately identifies USD66,273 of employee sharing. Its 2025 audit records USD163,034 owed to FLI for payroll and other costs paid on the foundation’s behalf. That is a year-end receivable, not a cash transfer on that date. The cost-sharing agreement would clarify allocation and approval rules.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e58",
              "w2-fli-due-baif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement. Financial details: value: 163,034; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-due-baif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
            "sourceName": "Beneficial AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 Schedule R; employee-sharing amount $66,273 separately. Related transactions are not independent donations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e58"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$73,577 expense reimbursement",
            "sourceName": "Beneficial AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Entity and governance resolution",
            "text": "FLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1.",
            "matched": [
              "Beneficial AI Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d1b431f17e7544aad3669a7c756aef5b981796db1d2d6df3a90af8359974ab60"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cais",
      "label": "Center for AI Safety",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A US nonprofit focused on reducing risks from advanced AI, combining research with public advocacy.",
      "aliases": [
        "CAIS"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "AI research & advocacy nonprofit"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cais",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cais",
        "name": "Center for AI Safety",
        "role": "AI research & advocacy nonprofit",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A US nonprofit focused on reducing risks from advanced AI, combining research with public advocacy.",
        "why": "It sits at a junction between donors, technical researchers and public communication about AI risk. Historical Good Ventures grants establish a substantial financial connection.",
        "about": [
          "The Center for AI Safety and its Action Fund are separate organisations. Four historical Good Ventures awards identified in this investigation total about $12.49 million; the sequence ends with an October 2023 exit grant. Those awards do not establish who funds every current CAIS activity."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "CAIS"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
            "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS leadership",
            "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 16
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A US nonprofit focused on reducing risks from advanced AI, combining research with public advocacy.",
        "structuralRole": "Research, donor support and public communication",
        "significance": "CAIS sits between technical AI-risk work, philanthropic funding and public communication. Its documented grants and creator-programme connections show how those functions can reinforce one another, while its Action Fund remains a separate organisation.",
        "background": [
          "The Center for AI Safety and its Action Fund are separate organisations. Four historical Good Ventures awards identified in this investigation total about $12.49 million; the sequence ends with an October 2023 exit grant. Those awards do not establish who funds every current CAIS activity."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How research connects to public communication",
            "text": "Alongside technical AI-risk work, CAIS appears in Frame’s creator-training network. Frame names it as a participating organisation and describes CAIS contracts for creators Mikey Posada and Veronica Hylak. These are the programme’s published descriptions of particular connections, rather than a general finding that CAIS directs all of Frame’s output.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: organisation and creator connections",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2023 Schedule D Part X uses conditional reserve language; this entry is not a payment receipt. Financial details: value: 5,259,802; currency: USD; kind: potential refund reserve; period: Year ended 2023-12-31 Amount basis: carrying value",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n43"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CAIS potential-refund reserve",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$5,259,802 potential-refund reserve",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "CAIS potential-refund reserve",
            "date": "Year ended 2023-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 return carries $5,259,802 at opening. Closing other liabilities are $483,825, solely an operating lease liability in Schedule D. Cash settlement versus release/reclassification is unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n45"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CAIS 2024 liability close",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Refund reserve no longer listed",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "CAIS 2024 liability close",
            "date": "Year ended 2024-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical author affiliation, not a verified present job or funding relationship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e181"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Affiliation on 2023 paper",
            "sourceName": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Coalition website includes this organization in its member roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-member-cais"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed coalition member",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Filed calendar-2023 grant; upstream donor/account unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e64"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
                "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$1,455,200 cash grant",
            "sourceName": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "FLI official biography supplies CAIS governance bridge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e55"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board member",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current organization biography at cutoff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e67"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS leadership",
                "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive / research director",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Court-filed disclosure lists CAIS among completed donation-recovery resolutions. This is a party's filed account; exact agreement, payment mechanics and reserve reconciliation remain missing. Financial details: value: 5,200,000; currency: USD; kind: party-reported settlement resolution; period: 2023-12-16 filing Amount basis: reported settlement",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n44"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
                "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$5.2m resolution reported by debtors",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate",
            "date": "2023-12-16 filing"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
            "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS leadership",
            "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD"
          },
          {
            "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
            "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Center for AI Safety is a US nonprofit combining technical work on advanced-AI risks with public communication. Its connections include philanthropic grants, scientific and organizational leadership, and creator programmes. Its associated Action Fund is a separate organization with its own funding records.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects technical AI-risk work with wider public influence",
          "significance": "CAIS matters because research institutions can supply both technical arguments and opportunities for communicating them. Its grant history and creator-programme connections show how expertise, money and audience reach meet in an operating organization.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "CAIS works on reducing risks from advanced AI and combines research with public advocacy. Dan Hendrycks is a prominent figure in that work, and FLI’s biography of Jaan Tallinn identifies Tallinn’s CAIS board role. These relationships connect a technical research institution with donors and organizations elsewhere in the AI-risk field.",
            "The historical resources include four Good Ventures awards totaling about $12.49 million between November 2022 and October 2023. The final award was listed as an exit grant. Silicon Valley Community Foundation’s 2023 return also records a $1,455,200 cash grant. These records explain a significant resource base during that period and give the organization a financial history extending beyond its most visible public statements.",
            "CAIS also appears in Frame’s creator-training network. Frame names it as a participating organization and describes contracts involving creators Mikey Posada and Veronica Hylak. This is a practical route by which an organization working on technical risk can gain communication capacity: creators receive access, experience and opportunities while an institution can reach people beyond its specialist audience.",
            "The Center for AI Safety Action Fund should be followed through its separate record. Tallinn’s donor ledger reports $3.221 million associated with that fund across five 2023–2024 entries. Keeping the two organizations legible helps readers understand which body is carrying out which work. The broader significance of CAIS remains the way technical research, philanthropic backing and public communication reinforce one another."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
              "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
              "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
            },
            {
              "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
              "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
              "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
              "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "caisaction",
      "label": "CAIS Action Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Separate 501(c)(4), EIN 93-2442608.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/caisaction",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "caisaction",
        "name": "CAIS Action Fund",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Separate 501(c)(4), EIN 93-2442608.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate 501(c)(4), EIN 93-2442608."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate 501(c)(4), EIN 93-2442608.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger contains five payments associated with the Center for AI Safety Action Fund totaling $3,221,000 during 2023–2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-caisaction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$3.221m across five 2023–2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "IRS-derived officer extraction; separate 501(c)(4), inter-entity transfers not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e68"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "President in FY2024 return",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "date": "2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "hendrycks",
      "label": "Dan Hendrycks",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CAIS executive/research director; industry advisory roles do not establish campaign financing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/hendrycks",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "hendrycks",
        "name": "Dan Hendrycks",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CAIS executive/research director; industry advisory roles do not establish campaign financing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAIS executive/research director; industry advisory roles do not establish campaign financing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS leadership",
            "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
          },
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Dan Hendrycks leads research and executive work at the Center for AI Safety. The 2024 CAIS Action Fund return names him as president of that separate organisation, while his professional biography also lists advisory roles with xAI and Scale AI.",
        "structuralRole": "A connection between safety research, political advocacy and AI industry",
        "significance": "Hendrycks occupies roles across institutions often treated as opposing camps. Those roles help explain how technical arguments, advocacy and industry advice interact; they do not establish that an AI company finances or directs a campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Research and organisational roles",
            "text": "The CAIS biography identifies his leadership role, and the Action Fund filing supplies a separate officer relationship. His advisory descriptions do not disclose compensation, terms or decision rights. Hendrycks also coauthored the 2023 AI Deception paper with Aidan O’Gara, which discusses authentication and disclosure approaches. A proposal in that paper is evidence of a research position, not that either author drafted Australian identity policy or advisory clients adopted it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS leadership",
                "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
              },
              {
                "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
                "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e67",
              "e68",
              "e69",
              "e70",
              "e187"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named author on the 2023 AI Deception paper, alongside Aidan O’Gara. The recommendations do not establish participation in Australian identity policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e187"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Deception paper",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "AI Deception paper",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e69"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
                "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "xAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Professional adviser",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "xAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current organization biography at cutoff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e67"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS leadership",
                "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive / research director",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "IRS-derived officer extraction; separate 501(c)(4), inter-entity transfers not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e68"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "President in FY2024 return",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "date": "2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS leadership",
            "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
          },
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "goodventures",
      "label": "Good Ventures",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The foundation created in 2011 by Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz, a Facebook and Asana co-founder. It turns their private wealth into grants across global health, science, animal welfare and risks from advanced AI.",
      "aliases": [
        "Good Venture",
        "GoodVenture",
        "Moskovitz",
        "Tuna"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Philanthropic foundation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/goodventures",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "goodventures",
        "name": "Good Ventures",
        "role": "Philanthropic foundation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The foundation created in 2011 by Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz, a Facebook and Asana co-founder. It turns their private wealth into grants across global health, science, animal welfare and risks from advanced AI.",
        "why": "It is a substantial funding source behind parts of the AI-safety world. Its adviser, board and grantees occupy different points in the decision: recommending a grant, authorising it and choosing how to use it.",
        "about": [
          "Tuna chairs the foundation. Moskovitz is secretary and treasurer. The third listed board member is Divesh Makan, an ICONIQ Capital partner. This is the founders’ philanthropy; a grant from Good Ventures is not automatically a corporate payment from Facebook, Asana or ICONIQ.",
          "Coefficient Giving, formerly Open Philanthropy, is its philanthropic adviser. Good Ventures says it has distributed more than $6 billion across its causes. Its current giving page includes technical AI research at FAR AI and professional training at BlueDot Impact.",
          "The investigation identified four historical Center for AI Safety awards totalling $12,485,288 between November 2022 and October 2023. The last was described as an exit grant. The historical grant index supports the awards; it does not demonstrate current sponsorship or cash received by CAIS."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Good Venture",
          "GoodVenture",
          "Moskovitz",
          "Tuna"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures: founders and history",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/our-story/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures: board",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures: giving and focus areas",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/our-giving/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical grant index (old pages may redirect)",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 10
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The foundation created in 2011 by Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz, a Facebook and Asana co-founder. It turns their private wealth into grants across global health, science, animal welfare and risks from advanced AI.",
        "structuralRole": "Founders’ wealth translated into philanthropic grants",
        "significance": "Good Ventures connects the wealth of Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz with organised grantmaking. Its board, philanthropic adviser and recipients occupy different decision points: recommending an award, authorising it and deciding how to carry out the funded work.",
        "background": [
          "Tuna chairs the foundation. Moskovitz is secretary and treasurer. The third listed board member is Divesh Makan, an ICONIQ Capital partner. This is the founders’ philanthropy; a grant from Good Ventures is not automatically a corporate payment from Facebook, Asana or ICONIQ.",
          "Coefficient Giving, formerly Open Philanthropy, is its philanthropic adviser. Good Ventures says it has distributed more than $6 billion across its causes. Its current giving page includes technical AI research at FAR AI and professional training at BlueDot Impact.",
          "The investigation identified four historical Center for AI Safety awards totalling $12,485,288 between November 2022 and October 2023. The last was described as an exit grant. The historical grant index supports the awards; it does not demonstrate current sponsorship or cash received by CAIS."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "An archived February 2024 entry lists a $6.8m two-year Pattern Labs grant recommended by Open Philanthropy. Pattern Labs later became Irregular.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
                "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-gv-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The foundation’s expenditure-responsibility statement dates this instalment of the $6.8 million Pattern Labs award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-gv-first-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
              },
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports $4,533,333 grant payment",
            "sourceName": "Good Ventures",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Institutional advisory role; recommendations and actual foundation awards must not be counted twice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e59"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Primary philanthropic adviser",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Good Ventures records a Pattern Labs grantee report dated 15 March 2025 and $2,639,613 expended.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-grantee-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
              },
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Grantee report dated 15 March 2025",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current governance disclosure at cutoff; no Facebook/Asana corporate contribution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e61"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures governance",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder / secretary / treasurer",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "ICONIQ partner; no ICONIQ donation or campaign authority inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e62"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures governance",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Divesh Makan",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board member",
            "sourceName": "Divesh Makan",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Good Ventures lists a February 2024 Pattern Labs award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-gv-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
                "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$6.8m grant entry / two years",
            "sourceName": "Good Ventures",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current governance disclosure at investigation cutoff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e60"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures governance",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cari Tuna",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder / board chair",
            "sourceName": "Cari Tuna",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Source identifies this as an exit grant. Financial details: value: 1,866,559; currency: USD; kind: exit grant award; period: 2023-10 Amount basis: indexed award",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e63d"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
                "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$1,866,559 · Exit grant award",
            "sourceName": "Good Ventures",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "2023-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-cais-findings",
            "title": "CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings",
            "heading": "Typed edges",
            "text": "Four historical Good Ventures award entries total $12,485,288, but that is an award inventory, not a reconciled received-funding total. Open Philanthropy recommendations and Good Ventures awards must not be double counted.",
            "matched": [
              "Good Ventures"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "43800a85bc166d085d7293ee0148c48e68a0de61f4c56da8c618498bbc34c331"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests",
            "heading": "The remaining documents would settle different questions",
            "text": "The 15 March 2025 grantee report and the signed Good Ventures agreement would show the reported work and the actual grant restrictions. They are the direct route to answering how philanthropic support interacted with commercial development.",
            "matched": [
              "Good Ventures"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "371268472f432122cbf2e8ffff9eecf35f964207a3f5e9cf4b3931b8e82c4382"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "Public money bought technical input",
            "text": "These purchases sit alongside the previously documented $6.8 million Good Ventures grant and later $80 million venture announcement . Philanthropic support, government procurement and venture investment are all present in this company’s history.",
            "matched": [
              "Good Ventures"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "192c93a9b505e1bd1fb18e65c0beb770ef1a65d0f4524e7e3bf1516910249bed"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The next records are now identifiable",
            "text": "The financial question is similarly concrete: the Good Ventures grant agreement and expenditure reports could explain restrictions, reporting duties and commercial-use terms. That is the next useful step from “who funded them?” to “what did that funding oblige them to do?”",
            "matched": [
              "Good Ventures"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "97a8204b5f739afdab53721fa8634f764fe2ef756448e555bda4381d513f08ac"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures: founders and history",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/our-story/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures: board",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures: giving and focus areas",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/our-giving/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical grant index (old pages may redirect)",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
            "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Good Ventures is the foundation created by Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz, the Facebook and Asana co-founder. It turns their wealth into grants across global health, science, animal welfare and risks from advanced AI, with Coefficient Giving serving as its philanthropic adviser.",
          "structuralRole": "Converts private wealth into sustained research and institutional capacity",
          "significance": "Good Ventures is an important upstream funder because its grants can sustain organizations and whole areas of work. Its governance and adviser relationship show how substantial private resources are directed toward selected causes and recipients.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Founded in 2011, Good Ventures is the philanthropic institution created by Tuna and Moskovitz. Tuna chairs its board; Moskovitz is secretary and treasurer. The third listed board member is Divesh Makan, an ICONIQ Capital partner. This gives the foundation an identifiable governing structure for directing resources drawn from the founders’ wealth.",
            "The scale and range are substantial. Good Ventures says it has distributed more than $6 billion across its causes. Those include global health, science and animal welfare as well as risks from advanced AI. Its current giving information includes technical work at FAR AI and professional training at BlueDot Impact. AI policy therefore sits within a broader philanthropic portfolio, alongside work intended to build technical and professional capacity.",
            "Coefficient Giving, formerly Open Philanthropy, researches causes and supports its giving decisions. That advisory relationship is an important part of the story: identifying promising opportunities and recommending recipients can shape the field before a foundation authorizes an award. The resulting organizations may then use those resources for research, training or other work within their missions.",
            "The investigation found four historical Center for AI Safety awards totaling $12,485,288 from November 2022 to October 2023. The final award was described as an exit grant. The sequence illustrates both substantial support and the possibility of a funding relationship ending. Good Ventures is consequently useful for understanding how a field is financed over time, including changes in which institutions a major donor chooses to support.",
            "Good Ventures reports the full $6.8 million Pattern Labs grant paid in two instalments, on 5 March 2024 and 4 February 2025. Pattern Labs later became Irregular. The foundation identifies a grantee report dated 15 March 2025 reporting $2,639,613 expended; the same figure appears in both examined returns. The signed grant agreement and report body have not been obtained."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Good Ventures governance",
              "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Good Ventures",
              "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
              "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
            },
            {
              "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
              "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
              "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
            },
            {
              "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
              "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-19"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "coefficient",
      "label": "Coefficient Giving",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The organisation formerly called Open Philanthropy, which researches causes and recommends giving opportunities to donors including Good Ventures.",
      "aliases": [
        "Open Philanthropy",
        "Open Phil",
        "Coefficient"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Philanthropic adviser"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/coefficient",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "coefficient",
        "name": "Coefficient Giving",
        "role": "Philanthropic adviser",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The organisation formerly called Open Philanthropy, which researches causes and recommends giving opportunities to donors including Good Ventures.",
        "why": "Advisers can shape what gets funded before a foundation formally approves an award. This places research and recommendation work upstream of money reaching a recipient.",
        "about": [
          "Good Ventures credits Coefficient’s team with supporting its giving. A recommendation and the resulting foundation grant describe different stages of the same process; counting both as separate expenditure would inflate the total."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Open Philanthropy",
          "Open Phil",
          "Coefficient"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A major philanthropic grantmaker financing research, career pathways and the creation of new AI institutions.",
        "structuralRole": "Capital allocation and institution formation",
        "significance": "It can shape which kinds of organizations exist, how quickly they grow and which work attracts careers.",
        "background": [
          "Good Ventures credits Coefficient’s team with supporting its giving. A recommendation and the resulting foundation grant describe different stages of the same process; counting both as separate expenditure would inflate the total."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR commitment and limits",
            "text": "CLTR reports a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment plus separate matching up to £3m in its 2024 report published in 2025. It also says grant commitments deny donor influence over its strategy. Receipt dates and executed terms would determine the actual funding and contractual relationship.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The September 2026 expansion",
            "text": "Coefficient reports $168m of technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding commitments in 2024, $351m in 2025 and a projection above $1bn in 2026. Its definition is formally recommended funding. It is accelerating approval and recruiting new founders through Project Tailwind.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-coefficient",
              "w46-e-coefficient-80k",
              "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
              "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient",
              "w46-e-oehlsen-coefficient",
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
              "w46-e-coefficient-redwood",
              "w46-e-coefficient-epoch",
              "w46-e-coefficient-egc",
              "w46-e-coefficient-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding both organizations and their recruitment channels",
            "text": "80,000 Hours identifies Coefficient as its largest donor while interviewing its grantmaker about funding new nonprofits. Elsewhere, the Effective Giving and Careers programme backs routes into development, health and animal-welfare policy. These relationships connect money, people and institutional capacity.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-coefficient",
              "w46-e-coefficient-80k",
              "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
              "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient",
              "w46-e-oehlsen-coefficient",
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
              "w46-e-coefficient-redwood",
              "w46-e-coefficient-epoch",
              "w46-e-coefficient-egc",
              "w46-e-coefficient-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The Pattern Labs grant record names Open Philanthropy as recommender. Heron separately discloses Coefficient Giving funding.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
                "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-cg-recommendation",
              "w47-e-cg-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Which entity does what?",
            "text": "Most staff work for its Research organization or LLC; awards come through Advisors Inc., Action Fund, donor-advised funds and Good Ventures. Tuna, Moskovitz and Berger sit on both listed employer boards. Exact awarders must be identified grant by grant.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coefficient Giving: Our Structure",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
              "w48-cap-e-cg-epoch-tracker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient Giving → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $15,925,143; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The September 17 podcast identifies Coefficient Giving as 80,000 Hours' largest donor; the host says Max Nadeau's team has not directly funded it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-80k"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "80,000 Hours",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Largest donor, disclosed by recipient",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "80,000 Hours",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Resolution describes a $160m award with a conditional component tied to hiring and compute needs; the base includes regranting.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolution: $160m grant and its conditions",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/funding"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$108m base + $52m conditional",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Resolution",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The organization now named Coefficient Giving identifies Karnofsky as its former CEO, who stepped down in 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-former-ceo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our Progress in 2023 and Plans for 2024",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former CEO of Open Philanthropy",
            "sourceName": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient reports a renewal recommendation supporting Epoch's capacity, benchmarks, data and economics work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-epoch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Epoch AI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$68m recommended / three years",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Epoch AI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Coefficient launches Project Tailwind to find and finance founders of ambitious AI-safety initiatives.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Tailwind",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Launches nonprofit-founder initiative",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Project Tailwind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "His prior responsibilities included communications, grantmaking teams and organization-wide policies.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Zachary Robinson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former chief of staff at Open Philanthropy",
            "sourceName": "Zachary Robinson",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Institutional advisory role; recommendations and actual foundation awards must not be counted twice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e59"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Primary philanthropic adviser",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "4. Direct donor database searches",
            "text": "Targeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "Coefficient Giving",
              "Open Philanthropy",
              "Coefficient"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a18b9ce4f409a2c7a0a5f8eac5cf78166d8ed67cad773f709ee7bc7cba0f337c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-cais-findings",
            "title": "CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings",
            "heading": "Main result",
            "text": "CAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster.",
            "matched": [
              "Coefficient Giving",
              "Open Philanthropy",
              "Open Phil",
              "Coefficient"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7a0192f2299a89dbe2a66e83656ea5fe85c829e6ac288be4b42fddbad5fe4bfa"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "text": "The striking development is organizational. Coefficient Giving wants more AI-safety institutions to exist, is making larger grants to existing ones, and is recruiting people to create the next wave. The careers organization 80,000 Hours supplies one route from an interested audience to the people who can do that work.",
            "matched": [
              "Coefficient Giving",
              "Coefficient"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "14534919bb47165f32a5ef977ef8e3d574528fbebc5e17b89e7d77120d3e7ec2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "The most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI.",
            "matched": [
              "Coefficient Giving",
              "Coefficient"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7cb9999014c5bda1f892275d6268aceaebe17f86b1417e028682a31c1462c471"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
            "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Our Progress in 2023 and Plans for 2024",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
            "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolution: $160m grant and its conditions",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/funding"
          },
          {
            "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coefficient Giving: Our Structure",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "A major philanthropic grantmaker financing research, career pathways and the creation of new AI institutions.",
          "structuralRole": "Capital allocation and institution formation",
          "significance": "It can shape which kinds of organizations exist, how quickly they grow and which work attracts careers.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Coefficient Giving is the organization formerly known as Open Philanthropy. Good Ventures identifies it as its philanthropic adviser and credits its team with supporting the foundation’s giving. That role includes investigating causes and opportunities, allowing donors to draw on a professional research and recommendation process when allocating substantial resources.",
            "The importance of that work goes beyond choosing a single project. Sustained support can allow organizations to recruit specialists, establish training programmes or maintain policy capacity. In this network, those choices help explain the institutions available to produce AI-risk research, brief policymakers and develop regulatory ideas. The adviser helps organize the judgments on which major giving decisions depend.",
            "The Centre for Long-Term Resilience provides a concrete policy example. Its 2024 annual report, published in 2025, describes an Open Philanthropy commitment of £4 million over three years, with separate matching offered up to £3 million. CLTR works on government guidance and proposals for AI institutions. Its report says the commitments deny donors influence over strategy and priorities, making a distinction between supporting an institution and directing its particular recommendations.",
            "The historical footprint also includes MIRI, whose contributor list credits Open Philanthropy with about $15.93 million in cumulative support under its stated matching methodology. Talos separately acknowledges Coefficient support. These relationships show the breadth of institution-building around AI and long-term risks. Reading Coefficient alongside Good Ventures clarifies how research, donor decisions and recipient work connect within that funding landscape.",
            "Coefficient reports $168m of technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding commitments in 2024, $351m in 2025 and a projection above $1bn in 2026. Its definition is formally recommended funding. It is accelerating approval and recruiting new founders through Project Tailwind.",
            "80,000 Hours identifies Coefficient as its largest donor while interviewing its grantmaker about funding new nonprofits. Elsewhere, the Effective Giving and Careers programme backs routes into development, health and animal-welfare policy. These relationships connect money, people and institutional capacity.",
            "The Pattern Labs grant record names Open Philanthropy as recommender. Heron separately discloses Coefficient Giving funding.",
            "Most staff work for its Research organization or LLC; awards come through Advisors Inc., Action Fund, donor-advised funds and Good Ventures. Tuna, Moskovitz and Berger sit on both listed employer boards. Exact awarders must be identified grant by grant."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Good Ventures",
              "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
            },
            {
              "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
              "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
              "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
            },
            {
              "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
              "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
              "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
              "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
            },
            {
              "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
              "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
            },
            {
              "title": "About Heron",
              "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
            },
            {
              "title": "Coefficient Giving: Our Structure",
              "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/governance/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-19"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "tuna",
      "label": "Cari Tuna",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A former Wall Street Journal reporter who co-founded Good Ventures with Dustin Moskovitz and took the lead in developing its approach to giving.",
      "aliases": [
        "Cari"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Foundation co-founder & chair"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/tuna",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "tuna",
        "name": "Cari Tuna",
        "role": "Foundation co-founder & chair",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A former Wall Street Journal reporter who co-founded Good Ventures with Dustin Moskovitz and took the lead in developing its approach to giving.",
        "why": "She occupies a formal decision-making position at a foundation financing research, policy and public-interest work.",
        "about": [
          "Good Ventures identifies Tuna as its board chair. Its founders describe choosing causes by their importance, how neglected they are and whether further work can make progress. The resulting portfolio includes both immediate health needs and longer-term technological risks."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Cari"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A former Wall Street Journal reporter who co-founded Good Ventures with Dustin Moskovitz and took the lead in developing its approach to giving.",
        "structuralRole": "A governance link to Good Ventures",
        "significance": "Tuna’s founding and chair role places her at the governance level of Good Ventures. That establishes a role in the foundation behind the grants; individual grant conditions and approvals provide the evidence for particular spending decisions.",
        "background": [
          "Good Ventures identifies Tuna as its board chair. Its founders describe choosing causes by their importance, how neglected they are and whether further work can make progress. The resulting portfolio includes both immediate health needs and longer-term technological risks."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current governance disclosure at investigation cutoff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e60"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures governance",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder / board chair",
            "sourceName": "Cari Tuna",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon: bounded resignation and network check",
            "heading": "Financial record",
            "text": "The same return names Cari Tuna as president/director and Dustin Moskovitz as secretary/treasurer/director. This connects the named scholarship to the foundation's governance. It supplies no present campaign compensation, scholarship conditions, continuing obligation or instruction concerning this resignation. Personal recipient address is deliberately omitted from this note; the public filing remains in the separate original capture.",
            "matched": [
              "Cari Tuna"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1628ddc0890421481f688ed990901434ce5724493fca5514c9a57b6c3dd73efb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-cais-findings",
            "title": "CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings",
            "heading": "Main result",
            "text": "CAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster.",
            "matched": [
              "Cari Tuna"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7a0192f2299a89dbe2a66e83656ea5fe85c829e6ac288be4b42fddbad5fe4bfa"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "moskovitz",
      "label": "Dustin Moskovitz",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A Facebook and Asana co-founder who established Good Ventures with Cari Tuna to give away most of their wealth.",
      "aliases": [
        "Dustin",
        "Facebook",
        "Asana"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technology entrepreneur & philanthropist"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/moskovitz",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "moskovitz",
        "name": "Dustin Moskovitz",
        "role": "Technology entrepreneur & philanthropist",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A Facebook and Asana co-founder who established Good Ventures with Cari Tuna to give away most of their wealth.",
        "why": "His technology wealth supplies philanthropic capacity, while the foundation and its advisers decide which causes and organisations receive support.",
        "about": [
          "Good Ventures lists Moskovitz as secretary and treasurer. His personal and philanthropic roles need to be distinguished from the companies he helped found: they are different sources of money and authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Dustin",
          "Facebook",
          "Asana"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A Facebook and Asana co-founder who established Good Ventures with Cari Tuna to give away most of their wealth.",
        "structuralRole": "Source of wealth and foundation governance",
        "significance": "Moskovitz is part of both the origin of Good Ventures’ wealth and its board structure. The foundation’s philanthropic activity is a distinct institutional route from the businesses with which he is associated.",
        "background": [
          "Good Ventures lists Moskovitz as secretary and treasurer. His personal and philanthropic roles need to be distinguished from the companies he helped found: they are different sources of money and authority."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Another allocation channel",
            "text": "Commons lists approximately $5m of tentative first-round participation and $10m over its first year if that round goes well. These are intended amounts; the first-year figure includes the first round.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-moskovitz-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Investigations and public communication",
            "text": "In September he linked funding METR and Redwood to investigations, press communication and policy advice. Earlier posts place Anthropic shares in a foundation and name Good Ventures as an economic beneficiary; the exact legal holder remains unresolved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
                "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
              },
              {
                "title": "Moskovitz: Anthropic shares and foundation",
                "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3miawblqk7224"
              },
              {
                "title": "Moskovitz: Good Ventures benefits from Anthropic investments",
                "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mtygcpxluc2b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-metr",
              "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-redwood"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Commons lists approximately $5 million from Moskovitz for the first round and $10 million over the first year if it goes well.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-moskovitz-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tentative ~$5m first round",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current governance disclosure at cutoff; no Facebook/Asana corporate contribution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e61"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures governance",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder / secretary / treasurer",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Moskovitz names Redwood among organizations they fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-redwood"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
                "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Redwood Research",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Publicly states support",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "Redwood Research",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Moskovitz names METR among organizations they fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
                "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Publicly states support",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon: bounded resignation and network check",
            "heading": "Financial record",
            "text": "The same return names Cari Tuna as president/director and Dustin Moskovitz as secretary/treasurer/director. This connects the named scholarship to the foundation's governance. It supplies no present campaign compensation, scholarship conditions, continuing obligation or instruction concerning this resignation. Personal recipient address is deliberately omitted from this note; the public filing remains in the separate original capture.",
            "matched": [
              "Dustin Moskovitz",
              "Dustin",
              "Moskovitz"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1628ddc0890421481f688ed990901434ce5724493fca5514c9a57b6c3dd73efb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-cais-findings",
            "title": "CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings",
            "heading": "Main result",
            "text": "CAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster.",
            "matched": [
              "Dustin Moskovitz",
              "Dustin",
              "Moskovitz"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7a0192f2299a89dbe2a66e83656ea5fe85c829e6ac288be4b42fddbad5fe4bfa"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "No donation bridge established in the checked records",
            "text": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
            "matched": [
              "Moskovitz"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc189d3ac5523c7bc4a84efe32b4e5e02df52dba938fee8930ecfeba748a5221"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence",
            "heading": "Who makes the choices?",
            "text": "Moskovitz’s September 11 statement connects his support for METR and Redwood to investigations, public communication and policy advice. He separately says Anthropic shares sit in his foundation , and identifies Good Ventures as a beneficiary of Anthropic’s growth. The legal shareholding vehicle remains unnamed in those statements.",
            "matched": [
              "Moskovitz"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a645b4ef7b35566a415cae3e798775ca4bfb1b5ee5c57fe514ec0a6a8aa16238"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
            "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
          },
          {
            "title": "Moskovitz: Anthropic shares and foundation",
            "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3miawblqk7224"
          },
          {
            "title": "Moskovitz: Good Ventures benefits from Anthropic investments",
            "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mtygcpxluc2b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "makan",
      "label": "Divesh Makan",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "An ICONIQ Capital partner listed on the Good Ventures Foundation board alongside Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz.",
      "aliases": [
        "ICONIQ"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Investor & foundation board member"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/makan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "makan",
        "name": "Divesh Makan",
        "role": "Investor & foundation board member",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An ICONIQ Capital partner listed on the Good Ventures Foundation board alongside Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz.",
        "why": "His board seat is a documented connection between the foundation and an investment professional.",
        "about": [
          "The board role is the connection established here. The investigation has not identified an ICONIQ payment to the AI campaigns discussed on this site, or an instruction from ICONIQ to a grantee."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ICONIQ"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An ICONIQ Capital partner listed on the Good Ventures Foundation board alongside Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz.",
        "structuralRole": "Foundation governance connected to investment expertise",
        "significance": "Makan’s Good Ventures board role and ICONIQ Capital affiliation place investment expertise alongside the founders in the foundation’s governance. Those named roles establish the connection; they do not identify who proposed or approved every grant.",
        "background": [
          "The board role is the connection established here. The investigation has not identified an ICONIQ payment to the AI campaigns discussed on this site, or an instruction from ICONIQ to a grantee."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "ICONIQ partner; no ICONIQ donation or campaign authority inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e62"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures governance",
                "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board member",
            "sourceName": "Divesh Makan",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svcf",
      "label": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "2023 CAIS grant disclosed. Upstream donor/account unidentified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/svcf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "svcf",
        "name": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "2023 CAIS grant disclosed. Upstream donor/account unidentified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2023 CAIS grant disclosed. Upstream donor/account unidentified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
            "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2023 CAIS grant disclosed. Upstream donor/account unidentified.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NEED identifies Silicon Valley Community Foundation as the grant source.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-svcf-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
                "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Grant disclosed by recipient",
            "sourceName": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "targetName": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Filed calendar-2023 grant; upstream donor/account unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e64"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
                "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$1,455,200 cash grant",
            "sourceName": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "heading": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "text": "NEED supports student routes into international-development careers. Its funding disclosure names a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The map records the grantor and adviser separately: those are two roles in the same disclosed arrangement.",
            "matched": [
              "Silicon Valley Community Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a737fb73f8d1c13933d2c4c80c552313ce2e1317166b5035ab9da990683a247e"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
            "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cht",
      "label": "Center for Humane Technology",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Recipient of 2023 recommended FLI policy/messaging award.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cht",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cht",
        "name": "Center for Humane Technology",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Recipient of 2023 recommended FLI policy/messaging award.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recipient of 2023 recommended FLI policy/messaging award."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient of 2023 recommended FLI policy/messaging award.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2023 recommended policy/messaging-cohesion award; not verified cash transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e66"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$500,000 recommended grant",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Center for Humane Technology",
            "date": "2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "dma",
      "label": "Digital Media Accelerator",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "FLI creator program; up to $100k/month planned across projects.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/dma",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "dma",
        "name": "Digital Media Accelerator",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI creator program; up to $100k/month planned across projects.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FLI creator program; up to $100k/month planned across projects."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FLI creator program; up to $100k/month planned across projects.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Rolling application assesses applicant views/alignment and projected reach. Planned aggregate funding up to $100k monthly, not actual annual spend.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e71"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operates creator accelerator",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Digital Media Accelerator",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Aggregate planned funding across Digital Media Accelerator projects, not actual monthly or annual expenditure or a specific creator payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e188"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "described planned aggregate support of up to $100k/month for",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Digital Media Accelerator",
            "date": "Programme page read 5 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Findings that change the story",
            "text": "Paid, directed creator work is established by primary sources. There are two mechanisms whose budgets and counts must remain separate: FLI's Digital Media Accelerator (DMA), and the Protect What's Human campaign offered through People First. DMA's application asks applicants to explain alignment with FLI's AI position and their own views, estimates organic impressions, and advertises planned support of up to USD 100,000 monthly across projects. Public wording contemplates limited constructive proposal feedback. People First's campaign describes following directions, submitting drafts, receiving feedback, publishing and receiving payment. Its current general terms go further: prepublication approvals, adherence to approved messaging, revision/removal rights, and possible withholding of compensation. Those terms also require FTC endorsement/disclosure compliance, forbid unsubstantiated claims and artificial engagement. These facts establish sponsored advocacy and editorial conditions; they do not establish undisclosed sponsorship in any particular post. The campaign-specific statement of work and completed creator payments remain unobserved. Sources S4-S6.",
            "matched": [
              "Digital Media Accelerator"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b0c1372b4bc0af1a937dc5650451f6397201e35a132bb51e01da408988ccc2bd"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pwh",
      "label": "Protect What's Human",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "FLI campaign launched February 2026; up to $8m announced envelope, not audited spend.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pwh",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pwh",
        "name": "Protect What's Human",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI campaign launched February 2026; up to $8m announced envelope, not audited spend.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FLI campaign launched February 2026; up to $8m announced envelope, not audited spend."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FLI campaign launched February 2026; up to $8m announced envelope, not audited spend.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Campaign launch February 9, 2026. Ceiling across whole campaign; not influencer-only budget or audited expenditure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e72"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced an up-to-$8m campaign envelope",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Protect What's Human",
            "date": "2026-02-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public recruitment offer establishes proposed production mechanism, not completed posts or payments.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e75"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned campaign creators",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offered campaign-content work for",
            "sourceName": "Commissioned campaign creators",
            "targetName": "Protect What's Human",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public campaign recruitment mechanism; FLI-to-agency invoice not read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e73"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recruits campaign creators",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Protect What's Human",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Findings that change the story",
            "text": "FLI publicly launched the national Protect What's Human ad campaign on February 9, 2026, with a ceiling of up to USD 8 million and initial six/seven-figure investments in Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina. This is an announced campaign envelope, not an audited amount spent or an influencer-only budget. S7.",
            "matched": [
              "Protect What's Human"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "60e7c7f49ece7ceb70610782460be9de4345383cf82d96d0e91e714f07f3f7e7"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
            "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
            "heading": "Findings that change the story",
            "text": "Paid, directed creator work is established by primary sources. There are two mechanisms whose budgets and counts must remain separate: FLI's Digital Media Accelerator (DMA), and the Protect What's Human campaign offered through People First. DMA's application asks applicants to explain alignment with FLI's AI position and their own views, estimates organic impressions, and advertises planned support of up to USD 100,000 monthly across projects. Public wording contemplates limited constructive proposal feedback. People First's campaign describes following directions, submitting drafts, receiving feedback, publishing and receiving payment. Its current general terms go further: prepublication approvals, adherence to approved messaging, revision/removal rights, and possible withholding of compensation. Those terms also require FTC endorsement/disclosure compliance, forbid unsubstantiated claims and artificial engagement. These facts establish sponsored advocacy and editorial conditions; they do not establish undisclosed sponsorship in any particular post. The campaign-specific statement of work and completed creator payments remain unobserved. Sources S4-S6.",
            "matched": [
              "Protect What's Human"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b0c1372b4bc0af1a937dc5650451f6397201e35a132bb51e01da408988ccc2bd"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "peoplefirst",
      "label": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Creator recruitment agency. Separate from Public First Action.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/peoplefirst",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "peoplefirst",
        "name": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Creator recruitment agency. Separate from Public First Action.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Creator recruitment agency. Separate from Public First Action.",
          "Current People First general terms name People First Marketing, Inc. as creator counterparty, reserve Company/Advertiser approvals and revisions, condition payment on compliant completed publication and proof, require advertising disclosures, and identify Dots payouts. Individual SOWs set price/deliverables and override conflicting general terms. No specific accepted Protect What Is Human SOW was recovered."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "People First Marketing, Inc. is a creator-recruitment agency associated with the Protect What’s Human campaign. It supplies a mechanism for commissioning creator content and publishes general terms governing approval, revisions, compliance and payment. It is separate from Public First Action.",
        "structuralRole": "The contracting interface between a campaign and creators",
        "significance": "Recruitment can lead to an agreement specifying what content must satisfy before acceptance or payment. These terms explain potential influence more directly than a general assertion that a campaign supports creators.",
        "background": [
          "Current People First general terms name People First Marketing, Inc. as creator counterparty, reserve Company/Advertiser approvals and revisions, condition payment on compliant completed publication and proof, require advertising disclosures, and identify Dots payouts. Individual SOWs set price/deliverables and override conflicting general terms. No specific accepted Protect What Is Human SOW was recovered."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the available terms say",
            "text": "The public offer and general terms provide for approval, revision or removal and possible withholding of compensation, alongside disclosure-compliance duties. A campaign-specific statement of work may supersede those provisions; no accepted individual statement was recovered. The terms name Dots as a payout provider, but do not show it processed a payment for this campaign. The FLI-to-agency invoice and completed individual payments are also absent. The available terms establish a general mechanism, not a proven transaction in every case.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              },
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e73",
              "e74",
              "w1-creator-e-pf-terms",
              "w1-creator-e-pf-dots"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public offer and general terms provide approval/revision/removal and possible compensation withholding, plus disclosure compliance. Campaign SOW may supersede; individual completed payments unobserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e74"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              },
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned campaign creators",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Published creator offer / general terms",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Commissioned campaign creators",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "General platform mechanism only. No proof Dots processed a Protect What Is Human payment; no connection earned to the unidentified bank in the separate games-payment lane.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-pf-dots"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dots payout provider",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "terms name payout provider",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Dots payout provider",
            "date": "Current version2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Terms name the corporation and offer approval, compliance and conditional payment rules. Campaign-specific SOW can override; no accepted SOW found.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-pf-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              },
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People First general influencer terms, capture 8 September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes general creator contract terms",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "People First general influencer terms, capture 8 September 2026",
            "date": "Current public version captured2026-09-08; historical applicability unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public campaign recruitment mechanism; FLI-to-agency invoice not read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e73"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Protect What's Human",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recruits campaign creators",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Protect What's Human",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pwhcreators",
      "label": "Commissioned campaign creators",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Public offer and general editorial/disclosure terms; individual payment ledger unobserved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pwhcreators",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pwhcreators",
        "name": "Commissioned campaign creators",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Public offer and general editorial/disclosure terms; individual payment ledger unobserved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public offer and general editorial/disclosure terms; individual payment ledger unobserved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public offer and general editorial/disclosure terms; individual payment ledger unobserved.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public offer and general terms provide approval/revision/removal and possible compensation withholding, plus disclosure compliance. Campaign SOW may supersede; individual completed payments unobserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e74"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              },
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Published creator offer / general terms",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Commissioned campaign creators",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public recruitment offer establishes proposed production mechanism, not completed posts or payments.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e75"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Protect What's Human",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offered campaign-content work for",
            "sourceName": "Commissioned campaign creators",
            "targetName": "Protect What's Human",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "frame",
      "label": "Frame Fellowship",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A programme supporting creators who communicate about AI, including training and opportunities to work with organisations.",
      "aliases": [
        "Frame"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Creator support & training"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/frame",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "frame",
        "name": "Frame Fellowship",
        "role": "Creator support & training",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A programme supporting creators who communicate about AI, including training and opportunities to work with organisations.",
        "why": "It provides an organised route from funding and expertise to videos and other public communication. Its different support tracks matter for editorial control.",
        "about": [
          "Frame describes both an independent creator track and a track working to institutional briefs. It names funding sources and denies funder control over content or selection. The terms of an individual commission would be needed to establish who approved a particular output."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Frame"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 15
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A programme supporting creators who communicate about AI, including training and opportunities to work with organisations.",
        "structuralRole": "Creator training, funding access and institutional placements",
        "significance": "Frame is a practical meeting point for creators, AI-safety organisations and financial support. Its independent and amplifier tracks offer different working arrangements, which makes the terms of selection, briefs, placement and editorial control central to understanding its influence.",
        "background": [
          "Frame describes both an independent creator track and a track working to institutional briefs. It names funding sources and denies funder control over content or selection. The terms of an individual commission would be needed to establish who approved a particular output."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two routes for creators",
            "text": "The fellowship advertises support, training and institutional contacts for people making AI-related content. Its September–November 2026 cohort advertises a $10,000 stipend plus accommodation and meals. One track describes independent editorial control; another places creators with organisations as amplifiers. That distinction matters because the arrangement can either support an independently chosen project or help deliver an institution’s brief.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: programme and tracks",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Named funding and stated independence",
            "text": "The public FAQ names AISTOF and the Long Term Future Fund as lead funders and says funders do not select fellows or direct editorial content. It also describes an organization-amplifier track working to briefs. The grant contracts and track assignment matter for any particular output.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              },
              {
                "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "New evidence and its limits",
            "text": "Organization-edited funding page reports USD 20,000 from Jaan Tallin (DAF), USD 280,000 from AISTOF and another undisclosed AISTOF amount. Akshyae Singh says USD 280,000 supported Cohort 1.0. Page identifies Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. No donor veto or exact grant terms obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Selection and sponsor name",
            "text": "Frame says it selected 13 of 150-plus applicants and names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor. This wave preserves that exact name in prose without assuming a legal crosswalk to the existing Manifund brand node. No donor veto, private grant agreement or hidden amount was obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-output-frame"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
            "sourceName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "targetName": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Singh offers to place promising fellows inside partner organizations to amplify their messages. Implementation and terms vary and are not established by the announcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Amplifier track",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced an embedded-creator track",
            "sourceName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "targetName": "Frame Amplifier track",
            "date": "2026-06-12 announcement"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-frame-aitof"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "programme names as lead funder",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Program lists Winga with ControlAI. Shared training infrastructure, not ControlAI funding to Frame.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e82"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Winga",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Past mentor",
            "sourceName": "Max Winga",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Past cohort; read 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame names Kidd, identifying his MATS co-executive director role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n05"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ryan Kidd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adviser listed",
            "sourceName": "Ryan Kidd",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Frame’s public FAQ names AISTOF among its lead funders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-frame"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named lead funder",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Named on Frame's official team page.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n01"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Akshyae Singh",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive director",
            "sourceName": "Akshyae Singh",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame names Spartz as adviser.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Drew Spartz",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adviser listed",
            "sourceName": "Drew Spartz",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "What would change this assessment",
            "text": "Targeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.",
            "matched": [
              "Frame Fellowship"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "98ce2205f3b3a945417e049a053a3ad02c3fbdfd6ce1aad92d21b892ab789337"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Creator and policy mechanism",
            "text": "Frame Fellowship's website identifies Max Winga as a past mentor from Control AI and CAIS as a participating organization. That establishes shared creator-training infrastructure, not a transfer of funds or common control between ControlAI and CAIS. Frame advertises a $10,000 stipend plus accommodation/meals for its September–November 2026 cohort and distinguishes an independent editorial-control track from an organizational amplifier track. The site also reports FLI funding for fellow Mateus De Souza and CAIS contracts for Mikey Posada and Veronica Hylak; these are Frame's claims about those organizations' relationships, not evidence that ControlAI funded Frame.",
            "matched": [
              "Frame Fellowship"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b6ecea43fbc798966710f00d63d1a86482469f331571e43303c36504cf1734c5"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Frame Fellowship supports creators making AI-related media through stipends, training and institutional contacts. Its programme includes an independent-creator track and an organization-amplifier track working with partner organizations. That makes it a practical meeting point for funding, creator careers and AI-safety communications.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects funded creator development to institutional communication needs",
          "significance": "Frame helps determine who gains time, training, contacts and opportunities to reach audiences. Its two tracks show different influence mechanisms: supporting a creator’s own work and helping an organization communicate through an assigned brief.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Frame advertises support for people making content about AI, including a September–November 2026 cohort offering a $10,000 stipend plus accommodation and meals. An organization-edited funding page says it selected thirteen participants from more than 150 applicants. Selection and support can materially change who has the time and resources to build a public voice.",
            "The programme describes two working arrangements. Independent creators retain editorial control over their projects; an amplifier track places creators with organizations to help communicate their messages. Frame also describes contracts involving CAIS and lists past mentors including ControlAI’s Max Winga. The fellowship therefore supplies more than financial support: it creates professional relationships and routes into commissioned work.",
            "Its public FAQ names AISTOF and the Long Term Future Fund as lead funders. The recipient-edited funding page reports $280,000 from AISTOF, an additional undisclosed AISTOF amount and $20,000 from “Jaan Tallin (DAF).” Akshyae Singh says the $280,000 supported its first cohort, and the page names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor. These disclosures identify important parts of the programme’s resource base.",
            "Frame says its funders do not select fellows or direct editorial content. The consequential distinction for an audience is the arrangement behind the particular work they encounter: an independently chosen project, an institutional commission or another form of support. Frame’s own structure shows how a field can develop communication capacity through training, selection, paid time and access to organizations seeking a wider audience."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
              "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
              "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sara",
      "label": "Sara Landi Tortoli",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Announced CAIS placement for September-November 2026; completion not verified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/sara",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "sara",
        "name": "Sara Landi Tortoli",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Announced CAIS placement for September-November 2026; completion not verified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Announced CAIS placement for September-November 2026; completion not verified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sara Landi Tortoli was announced by Frame Fellowship as having a forthcoming CAIS research-communication placement for September–November 2026. The announcement places her within the programme’s reported route into organisational communication work.",
        "structuralRole": "An announced placement connecting a creator programme to CAIS",
        "significance": "This shows an opportunity the fellowship seeks to arrange, while the timing matters. An announced placement describes an intended relationship, not completed communications, a paid deliverable or a message actually published.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the announcement supports",
            "text": "Frame identifies the prospective placement and planned period. The corpus does not establish completion, payment, an accepted contract or editorial requirements. An actual work product or dated account of the placement would supply the next useful evidence. Until then, the intended role remains distinct from a completed campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e77"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Organizer reports upcoming research-communication placement; no completed work/payment verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e77"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced a prospective CAIS placement for",
            "sourceName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "targetName": "Sara Landi Tortoli",
            "date": "2026-09-07–2026-11-15 (announced)"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "veronica",
      "label": "Veronica Hylak",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CAIS contract reported by Frame; executed contract and payment not read.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/veronica",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "veronica",
        "name": "Veronica Hylak",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CAIS contract reported by Frame; executed contract and payment not read.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAIS contract reported by Frame; executed contract and payment not read."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Veronica Hylak is a creator for whom Frame Fellowship reports a Center for AI Safety contract. Her entry follows that reported commissioning relationship, rather than presuming the terms of an unrecovered agreement.",
        "structuralRole": "A reported creator contract within the fellowship’s opportunity network",
        "significance": "The connection illustrates access from a support programme to organisations seeking communication work. Frame’s claim is specific enough to investigate, while leaving the deliverables and balance between creator independence and client approval unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The evidence available",
            "text": "Frame reports the contract as an outcome. The retained material includes no executed agreement, payment record, date or brief. It cannot establish the amount paid, a requirement to advance a particular argument or approval rights. A published output and its funding disclosure would provide a firmer audience-facing account.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e78"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Program-reported outcome; executed contract, amount, terms and date not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e78"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Creator contract reported by Frame",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "Veronica Hylak",
            "date": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mikey",
      "label": "Mikey Posada",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CAIS contract reported by Frame; amount/date/terms unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mikey",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mikey",
        "name": "Mikey Posada",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CAIS contract reported by Frame; amount/date/terms unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAIS contract reported by Frame; amount/date/terms unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mikey Posada is a creator for whom Frame Fellowship reports a Center for AI Safety contract. The entry captures a programme-reported professional outcome; the underlying agreement and work product were not recovered.",
        "structuralRole": "A reported route from creator development to commissioned work",
        "significance": "Posada’s connection illustrates what a fellowship can offer beyond training: access to organisations commissioning communication work. It is a pathway the programme reports, with the individual transaction still requiring its own evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What is known about the contract",
            "text": "Frame identifies a CAIS creator contract without an executed agreement, amount, date, brief or approval conditions. The record does not establish what Posada was required to say, whether payment completed or whether work was published. A specific output and agreement would turn this reported outcome into a fuller account.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e79"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Program-reported outcome; executed contract, amount, terms and date not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e79"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Creator contract reported by Frame",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "Mikey Posada",
            "date": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mateus",
      "label": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "FLI funding reported by Frame; amount/date/terms unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mateus",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mateus",
        "name": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI funding reported by Frame; amount/date/terms unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FLI funding reported by Frame; amount/date/terms unknown.",
          "Future Tense publicly says the named grant funders had no editorial control and that opinions are its own. This supports an independence claim for this output, not verified contract language or a universal practice."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mateus De Souza is the creator associated with Future Tense. Frame describes him as a fellowship outcome and reports FLI funding; his May 2026 video supplies a creator-side disclosure naming FLI, Frame and BlueDot Impact as supporters.",
        "structuralRole": "A creator whose output connects several support programmes",
        "significance": "De Souza helps explain what happens after a fellowship: a creator publishes work and acknowledges support. His statement adds a different source perspective to the programme account, while the actual agreements remain necessary to establish contractual influence.",
        "background": [
          "Future Tense publicly says the named grant funders had no editorial control and that opinions are its own. This supports an independence claim for this output, not verified contract language or a universal practice."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From fellowship to publication",
            "text": "Frame reports the funding outcome without supplying an agreement, amount or completed payment. The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development was published on 8 May 2026. Its description names three grant supporters and denies their editorial control. Those statements should be reported together. They do not establish a Frame-to-FLI transfer or justify treating the supporters as buyers of a preapproved script.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e80",
              "e81",
              "w2-creator-published-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Future Tense publication dated 8 May 2026. Current description identifies three grant supporters and denies editorial control; description history and payment instruments not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-creator-published-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the grant-acknowledging video",
            "sourceName": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
            "targetName": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "date": "Published 2026-05-08; description captured 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Funding assertion by program; grant agreement, amount and completed payment not read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e80"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Creator funding reported by Frame",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
            "date": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Program describes alumnus funding outcome; no Frame-to-FLI fiscal transfer inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e81"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Fellow outcome reported",
            "sourceName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "targetName": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
            "date": "Before 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary",
            "heading": "Candidate directional relationships and limits",
            "text": "The strongest rival to a present-tense exclusion-network account is documented channel retirement combined with an unresolved current distribution route. Conversely, the retirement notice cannot establish that historical signals had no continuing use. A high-value next record would be the historical GDI–Oracle licence/service description or a current distribution agreement specifying publisher review, update/deletion propagation and recipient discretion. No further acquisition is undertaken in this packet.",
            "matched": [
              "Tense"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "220f071f5d67d0338aba923503951854f16bf7b95548ac6455c0fceed15565c6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority",
            "text": "Creator influence is not one arrangement. People First's published terms provide for approval, revisions, compliance and conditional payment; an individual campaign statement of work was not acquired. Frame describes an independent creator track and an institutional-brief track, names funding sources, and denies funder control over content or selection. A Future Tense creator publicly acknowledged support from FLI, Frame and BlueDot while asserting editorial independence. Rational Animations and ControlAI acknowledged a partnership, but the fee and agreement remain unacquired. The sponsor behind the initial Sabine Hossenfelder account remains unidentified. A2",
            "matched": [
              "Tense"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2684e6c15a2c55245798aa2c10915bbb51651b25666635b5620924e8d56498bc"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "talos",
      "label": "Talos Network",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Membership and donor disclosure; gifts not earmarked to Eva Behrens on the retrieved record.",
      "aliases": [
        "Talos Network"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/talos",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "talos",
        "name": "Talos Network",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Membership and donor disclosure; gifts not earmarked to Eva Behrens on the retrieved record.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Membership and donor disclosure; gifts not earmarked to Eva Behrens on the retrieved record."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Talos Network"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Talos Network is a fellowship and membership network acknowledging support from FLI, Coefficient Giving and the Survival and Flourishing Fund. Eva Behrens reports membership, connecting it to a person later active in ControlAI.",
        "structuralRole": "A professional network supported by overlapping philanthropic institutions",
        "significance": "Talos supplies a setting in which people can develop contacts and experience. Funding a network and membership of an individual establish institutional proximity, without proving a donor sponsored that person or directed later work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Membership and donor independence",
            "text": "The donor disclosure gives no amounts or dates and says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. Behrens’s site supports membership; the specific 2022 cohort detail was less securely rendered. No earmark for her participation or onward payment to ControlAI is established. A restricted grant or individual fellowship award would be needed for those stronger financial claims.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e116",
              "e117",
              "e118",
              "e119"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Membership supported by personal site. Specific 2022 cohort detail less securely rendered; no donor earmarking for her fellowship established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e116"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Self-reported membership",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Talos Network",
            "date": "Historical; read 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e117"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Talos Network",
            "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "The most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI.",
            "matched": [
              "Talos Network"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7cb9999014c5bda1f892275d6268aceaebe17f86b1417e028682a31c1462c471"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sff",
      "label": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Disclosed Talos supporter. No established grant to ControlAI.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/sff",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "sff",
        "name": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Disclosed Talos supporter. No established grant to ControlAI.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Disclosed Talos supporter. No established grant to ControlAI."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A grant-recommendation programme supported by donors including Jaan Tallinn, with a structured process for allocating support.",
        "structuralRole": "Donor resources translated into funding recommendations",
        "significance": "The procedure exposes allocation influence; administrators, recommenders and donors have distinguishable responsibilities.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Different kinds of funding record",
            "text": "The 2024 table recommends USD48,000 for CeSIA with EffiSciences as receiving charity. TFS recommendations name Jaan Tallinn as source for USD97,000 in 2024 and USD336,000 in 2025. The Mox fundraiser separately shows a USD20,000 SFF contribution, with Austin Chen reporting receipt through Manifund. Talos discloses SFF support without an amount and states that donors do not select fellows or direct strategy. These records do not establish an onward grant to ControlAI.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              },
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e119",
              "n12",
              "w8-red-e-sff-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2024",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2025"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "How recommendations acquire donor weight",
            "text": "The 2025 process describes Tallinn setting deference weights and making final adjustments. Published recommendations can be conditional or pending, so they do not by themselves prove payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Administration is a separate role",
            "text": "SFC’s September 2026 update describes Tallinn as primary client while retaining its own governance and facilitation choices.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Survival and Flourishing Fund → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $3,372,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "SFF2024 lists Jaan Tallinn as source. Not verified disbursement. Financial details: value: 48,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended general support; EffiSciences receiving charity",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "SFF2024 round"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding. Financial details: value: 336,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2025"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding. Financial details: value: 97,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SFF’s 2025 process gives Tallinn a role in deference weights and final allocation adjustments.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-allocation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Weights and final funding adjustments",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CLTR’s 2023 annual report attributes all £470,224 received that year to SFF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-cltr-sff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "All £470,224 received in 2023",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SFC describes its work facilitating grants associated with SFF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-sfc-sff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Facilitates grantmaking",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
            "targetName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fundraiser displays an SFF donation and Chen states Manifund received a speculation grant for Mox. This is a public transaction report, not a bank statement. Financial details: value: 20,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant receipt; period: Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date Amount basis: platform reported credit",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mox",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$20,000 for Mox via Manifund",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "Mox",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "4. Direct donor database searches",
            "text": "Targeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "Survival and Flourishing Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a18b9ce4f409a2c7a0a5f8eac5cf78166d8ed67cad773f709ee7bc7cba0f337c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "The most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI.",
            "matched": [
              "Survival and Flourishing Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7cb9999014c5bda1f892275d6268aceaebe17f86b1417e028682a31c1462c471"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The institution and the money",
            "text": "MIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years. MIRI's contributor list",
            "matched": [
              "Survival and Flourishing Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "31932d145918d27ecc0b5cd2684e6cef3ccf4338228a00a73c1806d4fedaba10"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Survival and Flourishing Fund is a grant-recommendation programme supporting work on humanity’s long-term prospects, including AI safety, policy and related communities. It publishes recommended awards and a process in which assessors’ judgments, donor preferences and administrative work combine to direct resources.",
          "structuralRole": "Organizes selection and donor influence over funding priorities",
          "significance": "SFF makes a normally hidden part of philanthropy more visible: how candidate projects are assessed and whose judgment receives weight. Its recommendations help shape which institutions and proposals gain the resources to continue.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "SFF is best understood as an allocation process. It gathers and assesses funding opportunities, then publishes recommendations identifying recipients, amounts and sometimes funding sources or conditions. The records cover established research organizations, policy work, community projects and specific initiatives. This makes SFF a place where broad concern about long-term risks becomes choices among particular people and projects.",
            "Its 2025 process gives Jaan Tallinn a described role in setting deference weights for recommenders and making final adjustments. Those rules matter because the outcome depends on how judgments are combined. Expertise and donor preference meet inside an actual selection procedure, rather than appearing only as a list of donations after the decisions have been made.",
            "The network includes recommendations supporting The Future Society and CeSIA, acknowledged support for MIRI and Talos, and project-level connections such as the Mox fundraiser. Some recommendations are conditional or pending. Administrative payment work is associated with the separate Survival and Flourishing Corp., which describes Tallinn as its primary client while retaining its own governance and facilitation choices.",
            "This is a significant source of institutional capacity across the AI field. It can help organizations hire, develop proposals, run events or sustain shared infrastructure. The most useful reading follows an award from its stated purpose through the intended recipient and its actual work. SFF’s published process provides an unusually concrete starting point for understanding that sequence."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
              "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
            },
            {
              "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
              "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
            },
            {
              "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
              "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
              "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sfr",
      "label": "Secure Future Research",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The UK company through which ControlAI operates. It is limited by guarantee and has no share capital.",
      "aliases": [
        "Secure Future Research Ltd"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "UK legal entity behind ControlAI"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/sfr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "sfr",
        "name": "Secure Future Research",
        "role": "UK legal entity behind ControlAI",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The UK company through which ControlAI operates. It is limited by guarantee and has no share capital.",
        "why": "The company filings reveal where formal management and appointment powers sit. Those powers are more informative than an informal list of associates.",
        "about": [
          "Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens are each recorded with more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, together with director appointment or removal rights. Those bands do not imply an exact equal split. The acquired articles assign management and membership authority to directors."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Secure Future Research Ltd"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK company through which ControlAI operates. It is limited by guarantee and has no share capital.",
        "structuralRole": "The UK legal organisation behind ControlAI",
        "significance": "Secure Future Research is where the UK campaign’s legal governance sits. Its directors’ voting and appointment rights provide a firmer account of authority than the public-facing brand or a founder title.",
        "background": [
          "Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens are each recorded with more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, together with director appointment or removal rights. Those bands do not imply an exact equal split. The acquired articles assign management and membership authority to directors."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Same company, new name",
            "text": "Company 15088415 changed its name from Secure Future Research Ltd to CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026. The historical ledger payments remain under the earlier name.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and governing rights",
            "text": "Tallinn reports £2.5m in two 2023–2024 disbursements. Miotti and Behrens hold disclosed voting and appointment rights; inspected articles give no named Tallinn rights. Grant contracts and informal influence remain unexamined.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI significant control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI filing history",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The accounts do not give a funding percentage",
            "text": "The inspected 2024 and 2025 accounts omit income-and-expenditure statements. The 2025 balance-sheet residual is £20,122; it is not established annual profit. Large current assets and accruals/deferred income cannot be read as free cash or donor dependence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI 2025 accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI filing history",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The US filings identify Secure Future Research Ltd in their foreign-entity disclosures; the quarterly narrative calls its interest generalized. This is a specific disclosed UK-US link. The form provides several alternative grounds for listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-sfr-foreign-interest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed foreign-entity interest in lobbying",
            "sourceName": "Secure Future Research",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Directors manage, can delegate and revoke, appoint directors, and are the sole legal members. Committee liabilities require board authority or an approved budget. No donor authority or exercise inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research directors / legal members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "formal management and budget authority",
            "sourceName": "Secure Future Research directors / legal members",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Articles filed 2024-03-20; listed in current filing history 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e85"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Andrea Miotti",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 14 November 2023; USD ledger equivalent $615,850.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-control-2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£500,000 donation, November 2023",
            "sourceName": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports £2m disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 10 April 2024; USD ledger equivalent $2,546,200.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-control-2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£2m donation, April 2024",
            "sourceName": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Privacy notice connects Secure Future Research Ltd to ControlAI. Entity relation, not a payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e84"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK legal-entity notice",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/privacy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "UK operating / trading identity",
            "sourceName": "Secure Future Research",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Company 15088415, formerly Secure Future Research Ltd, became CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-legal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "UK legal identity",
            "sourceName": "Secure Future Research",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Initial director/PSC; both roles ceased November 7, 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e87"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nicolas Moës",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former director / voting controller",
            "sourceName": "Nicolas Moës",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "2023-08-22–2023-11-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "New UK formal-authority record",
            "text": "The articles call Secure Future Research Ltd the Foundation and define a Trustee as its company director (Schedule 1, PDF p 20). These are drafting terms for the existing company, not evidence of a second foundation or hidden board. Article 19.1 makes the directors the only legal members , and Article 17.2 allows the board to appoint directors (PDF pp 12–13). Article 7 assigns management and powers to the directors; Article 8 allows delegation, including further delegation if permitted, and lets the directors alter or terminate it. Article 8.4 requires committee expenditure/liabilities to be board-authorized or within a board-approved budget (PDF p 8).",
            "matched": [
              "Secure Future Research",
              "Secure Future Research Ltd"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e00a51e63caee0fd34e824cba63d39d65f52e45cd4b4ef96c1401eef16d56d7e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "New UK formal-authority record",
            "text": "Article 27 requires minutes of officer appointments, all company/board resolutions including decisions without meetings, and proceedings of board/company/committee meetings. Article 28 provides for accounting and company records (PDF p 17). This makes resolutions, delegation terms and budget authority a specific expected record family with Secure Future Research as custodian; actual existence/compliance and public availability remain unproved. No donor veto or external appointment power was identified in the inspected governance provisions. Grant agreements could nevertheless create contractual constraints and must be checked separately.",
            "matched": [
              "Secure Future Research"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d702ebd0db34482f064ae5dcd70d88e34d95abb0d3a783e752dd8fc1c1f9a0cc"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "heading": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "text": "Foreign-entity disclosures identify Secure Future Research Ltd. The registration reports a USD25,000 contribution entry and 0% ownership; Morrison’s separate form has a USD5,000 entry. The form allows several grounds for foreign-entity disclosure. Those entries do not identify an exact transfer date, establish UK-government sponsorship, or settle the terms of UK-US direction.",
            "matched": [
              "Secure Future Research",
              "Secure Future Research Ltd"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a12a4ef26e39b8de32c7101f87a0bd9c0b750fc726b3d3b1b88ffb350a9405a6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Legal identity and control",
            "text": "ControlAI's own privacy notice identifies Secure Future Research Ltd as its registered UK name. Companies House number 15088415; incorporated 22 August 2023; private company limited by guarantee without share capital; SIC 70210, public relations and communications. It is not the unrelated CTRL AI LTD 15994292, ENERGY CONTROL AI LTD or similarly named AI businesses surfaced in search.",
            "matched": [
              "Secure Future Research",
              "Secure Future Research Ltd"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "37f351f9224e2f53eb197088ce438b917514bb5755343428427f43894587443f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK legal-entity notice",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/privacy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI filing history",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 2025 accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "CONTROLAI is the UK company formerly named Secure Future Research Ltd. It is the legal organization behind the UK ControlAI campaign, with company number 15088415. The name changed on 10 September 2026; older financial records and donations still use Secure Future Research.",
          "structuralRole": "The UK campaign’s legal governance and finances",
          "significance": "This company is where campaign activity meets formal responsibility: who can appoint directors, approve budgets and manage resources. Its identity connects historical donor records to the organization operating under the ControlAI name today.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Company 15088415 is limited by guarantee and has no share capital. Its filed articles place management with the directors, who are also its legal members. Directors can delegate work, approve budgets and exercise appointment powers. These provisions locate the authority behind the public campaign in an identifiable legal organization.",
            "Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens are each recorded as holding more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, together with director-appointment or removal rights. Jaan Tallinn’s donor ledger reports £2.5 million sent to Secure Future Research in two installments during 2023–2024.",
            "The September 2026 change to CONTROLAI preserves the company’s identity. Its abbreviated 2024 and 2025 accounts provide balance-sheet information but omit a full income-and-expenditure statement, so the public accounts cannot establish Tallinn’s share of its total funding. The separate US organization has its own records and obligations.",
            "US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
            },
            {
              "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
              "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd 2025 filleted unaudited micro-entity accounts",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1&format=xhtml"
            },
            {
              "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
              "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
              "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "miotti",
      "label": "Andrea Miotti",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "The founder and chief executive of ControlAI, with a former strategy and AI-policy role at Conjecture.",
      "aliases": [
        "Andrea"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "ControlAI founder & CEO"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/miotti",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "miotti",
        "name": "Andrea Miotti",
        "role": "ControlAI founder & CEO",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The founder and chief executive of ControlAI, with a former strategy and AI-policy role at Conjecture.",
        "why": "He links an AI-alignment company, a campaigning organisation and efforts to translate AI-risk arguments into legislation.",
        "about": [
          "A parliamentary biography describes his former Conjecture strategy and governance work. UK filings also identify his voting and appointment rights at Secure Future Research, the company behind ControlAI. These are documented professional and governance connections."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Andrea"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The founder and chief executive of ControlAI, with a former strategy and AI-policy role at Conjecture.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy entrepreneur with formal UK governance rights",
        "significance": "Miotti connects Conjecture’s earlier AI-governance work to ControlAI’s campaigning and parliamentary engagement. He also holds recorded voting and director-appointment rights in the UK operating company, so his importance includes formal governance as well as public advocacy.",
        "background": [
          "A parliamentary biography describes his former Conjecture strategy and governance work. UK filings also identify his voting and appointment rights at Secure Future Research, the company behind ControlAI. These are documented professional and governance connections."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Update: the Sabine approach is identified",
            "text": "ControlAI identifies itself behind the approach Hossenfelder described. It disputes her account of editorial demands. Read the dedicated account for both positions and the missing correspondence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              },
              {
                "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e113"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
                "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "date": "2025-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Reports 6 hours/week and zero compensation, benefits and allowances; named books custodian. Does not establish current exclusive authority or erase later officers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-controlai-e-miotti-us-officer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported president treasurer and secretary",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2025-02-04 through 2025-12-31; return signed 2026-06-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e85"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2025 parliamentary biography describes former Head of Strategy and Governance. 2022 title was Head of AI Policy and Governance; not founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e96"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Conjecture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former policy / strategy leadership",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022–2025 professional record"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "September 2025 parliamentary source establishes submitted material and biography, not enacted recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e107"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Parliament",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Written evidence / professional biography",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2025-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-signature-miotti"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed individual signatory",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Andrea Miotti coauthored the response identifying ControlAI and explaining its creator partnerships.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-miotti-outreach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthors public account",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "German register identifies authorized representative; complete US board not independently mapped.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e90"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chief executive / representative",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2026 German registration"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "New original US financial obligation",
            "text": "The return covers 4 February–31 December 2025 , uses accrual accounting, marks itself initial, and was signed by Andrea Miotti on 23 June 2026 . It reports $136,570 contributions, $377 bank-fee refunds, total revenue $136,947, expenses $93,682, assets $69,178, liabilities $25,913 and net assets $43,265. These totals were previously available through a secondary listing; they now have original-return support.",
            "matched": [
              "Andrea Miotti",
              "Andrea",
              "Miotti"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "81cf309fa4aa76235b8803163bd0d3771c8ec1ec514bac631de39c4e78e0021d"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "New original US financial obligation",
            "text": "The next discriminating record is the creditor ledger entry and underlying balance confirmation/invoice/agreement, then its clearing entry. Control AI US is the custodian; the filed books contact is Miotti, and the preparer may hold workpapers. These are private records. A later public return could reveal a remaining balance without naming the creditor; that is a reopening trigger, not a promise of public donor identification.",
            "matched": [
              "Miotti"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7b715c67b73d4d2b188b3f3303b9cf4c59d721234ee7afc8b75f4e2768ffaf65"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "heading": "The important update",
            "text": "On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved . Andrea Miotti and Max Winga’s response disputes her description and says the negotiations went through her manager. ControlAI’s response",
            "matched": [
              "Andrea Miotti",
              "Andrea",
              "Miotti"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cab5f6f86c8d41012e2eefd62f11e7e9bdcc2b425fc532485a83729d02672e6c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine",
            "text": "Separately, ControlAI's 8 September post, by Andrea Miotti and Max Winga , says it was the organization negotiating with Hossenfelder and disputes her account. The supplied Sabine transcript itself left her offeror unnamed while separately naming ControlAI as sponsoring other creators. The correct update is: ControlAI subsequently self-identified as the organization involved. Its post does not publish the underlying emails or contracts, and Paul is not named.",
            "matched": [
              "Andrea Miotti",
              "Andrea",
              "Miotti"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "408698d64e19b490136404d38e70c9ef10c6ffeeccf2c7d471613dccb8d17d1f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
            "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Andrea Miotti is ControlAI’s founder and chief executive, with an earlier strategy and AI-policy role at Conjecture. He combines public advocacy and policy development with formal voting and appointment rights in the UK company behind the campaign, now registered as CONTROLAI.",
          "structuralRole": "Campaign leadership, policy access and formal company authority",
          "significance": "Miotti is a decision-bearing connection between the campaign’s arguments, organizational resources and relationships with lawmakers. His importance comes from the combination of executive work and recorded governance rights, as well as public visibility.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Miotti’s path into ControlAI runs through Conjecture. A parliamentary biography describes his former strategy and governance work there; the company’s earlier materials used an AI-policy and governance title. That background helps explain why ControlAI arrived with a developed view of AI risk, people from technical-safety work and a focus on government intervention.",
            "At ControlAI, he leads an organization that produces proposals, briefs politicians and recruits wider public support. The campaign’s September 2026 account says it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework. Miotti also stated a policy difference: the lawmakers’ broader pause went beyond the narrower approach ControlAI favored. His own public positions therefore help explain both cooperation and friction within the restriction coalition.",
            "His authority is also visible in legal records. Miotti and Eva Behrens each hold disclosed bands of voting rights and director-appointment or removal rights in the UK company. Its articles place management and membership authority with directors. Miotti was also named in the initial US organization’s tax filing as president, treasurer and secretary for that period.",
            "He is directly involved in explaining the campaign’s public communications. With Max Winga, he coauthored the September 8 response identifying ControlAI behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder and disputing her description of its editorial demands. The episode puts organizational leadership, creator outreach and the campaign’s account of its own standards in the same public record."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
              "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
            },
            {
              "title": "ControlAI's Creator Outreach",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
            },
            {
              "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "behrens",
      "label": "Eva Behrens",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A ControlAI special-projects lead and director of its UK operating company, with earlier operations work at Conjecture.",
      "aliases": [
        "Eva"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "ControlAI special projects"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/behrens",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "behrens",
        "name": "Eva Behrens",
        "role": "ControlAI special projects",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A ControlAI special-projects lead and director of its UK operating company, with earlier operations work at Conjecture.",
        "why": "Her formal company powers help explain who can make decisions within the campaign. Her professional history also links people across adjacent AI organisations.",
        "about": [
          "UK filings record her voting and director appointment rights at Secure Future Research. Her professional site described Talos Network membership and Conjecture work. Those affiliations do not establish that a Talos donor earmarked support for her work."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Eva"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 10
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A ControlAI special-projects lead and director of its UK operating company, with earlier operations work at Conjecture.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance, operations and policy research",
        "significance": "Behrens combines a public special-projects role with recorded voting and appointment rights in ControlAI’s UK company. Her earlier Conjecture operations and AI-policy work help explain how institutional knowledge and working relationships move between the organisations.",
        "background": [
          "UK filings record her voting and director appointment rights at Secure Future Research. Her professional site described Talos Network membership and Conjecture work. Those affiliations do not establish that a Talos donor earmarked support for her work."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Argues for unique persistent identifiers in European electronic IDs on reliability/privacy grounds. Does not establish universal online identity or involvement in age-verification campaigns.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e125"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Persistent electronic-ID identifiers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Authored eID design position",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Persistent electronic-ID identifiers",
            "date": "2022-10-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e114"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
                "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "date": "2025-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e86"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Self-description and May 2025 privacy notice. Conjecture work subsequently ended operationally per Leahy; no current continuity inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e97"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              },
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Conjecture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operations work in 2025",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Professional history dates CFG work end January 2025; no current employment inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e120"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Future Generations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former policy researcher",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Centre for Future Generations",
            "date": "Through 2025-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 biography references industrial policy and Sino-European relations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e124"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Federation of German Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Prior industrial-policy work",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Federation of German Industries",
            "date": "Before October 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operational biography; detailed budget-signature arrangements unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e89"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Special Projects Lead",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 employer biography; exact dates/pay not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e123"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OECD",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Prior fiscal-foresight work",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "OECD",
            "date": "Before October 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Legal identity and control",
            "text": "Andrea Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens are the two active UK directors, appointed 22 August 2023. Each is also a person with significant control: more than 25% but no more than 50% voting rights, and right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moës was a director and PSC from incorporation until 7 November 2023. Do not turn Miotti's founder title into sole legal control. ControlAI's current about page identifies Andrea Miotti as founder/CEO, Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, Eva Behrens as Special Projects Lead, Max Winga as Creator Outreach & Systems Lead, and Des Browne and Gabriel Alfour as advisors. It describes Leahy and Alfour as Conjecture cofounders and Alfour as having helped Andrea found ControlAI. This is personnel/organizational overlap, not proof of money transfers from Conjecture.",
            "matched": [
              "Eva Behrens",
              "Behrens"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "893a7b88e83ecf08d1e672ec867acb2bc4a431ec361743f63bb7b0c26e0d2d22"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "5. Conjecture resources and personnel transition",
            "text": "New corroboration for previous Behrens findings: https://www.talosnetwork.org/perspectives/alumni-newsletter-october-2025 . Opened/read, dated October14,2025, author David Conrad. Latest Publications explicitly identifies Behrens as Summer2022 alumna and reports Conjecture/ControlAI coauthorship. This upgrades the earlier indexed-only Talos cohort observation to a read primary publisher source; no fellowship payment or donor earmark follows from it.",
            "matched": [
              "Behrens"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8a0a1bd8fd5c6a6307939202b62f645dcabe8eab6645c7faf16dd8eb9dd3110c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Governance and the financial boundary",
            "text": "The UK entity is Secure Future Research Ltd, company 15088415, trading as ControlAI. Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens have each been directors since incorporation on 22 August 2023; each has more than 25% but no more than 50% of voting rights plus a right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moes was a director and PSC until 7 November 2023. These records support shared legal control. They do not disclose which individual makes each operational decision. [L01-L03]",
            "matched": [
              "Behrens"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e79e8bfd25fa293238357a487bd316c3e3b514e6929d6506ea2df3b899db58ec"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "Behrens has material formal authority at Secure Future Research Ltd (company 15088415, the UK ControlAI entity identified in the parent investigation), in addition to the public-facing Special Projects Lead title. Companies House lists her as an active director appointed 22 August 2023 and an active person with significant control: more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, plus rights to appoint/remove directors. Andrea Miotti is the other active director/PSC. Nicolas Moes resigned/ceased control on 7 November 2023. These are registered declarations, not proof of each person's day-to-day decisions. Do not call the voting percentage an equity share in a company limited by guarantee.",
            "matched": [
              "Behrens"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "244a1581866b7f6f9bb938c67d456d55ac4523b7d3b1e3436caed135d9386656"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDI institutional identity",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "moes",
      "label": "Nicolas Moës",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Former UK director/PSC; both ceased 7 November 2023.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/moes",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "moes",
        "name": "Nicolas Moës",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Former UK director/PSC; both ceased 7 November 2023.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Former UK director/PSC; both ceased 7 November 2023."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nicolas Moës was an initial director and person with significant control at Secure Future Research, the UK company behind ControlAI. Both recorded roles ended on 7 November 2023, following appointments on 22 August 2023.",
        "structuralRole": "A former governance participant at the UK company’s formation",
        "significance": "His importance is historical corporate authority during the organisation’s early period. The filings identify an actual governance role, but its end date prevents that early participation from being displayed as a present-day right to direct the campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The bounded company-record connection",
            "text": "The retained record places both the directorship and voting-control status in the August–November 2023 interval. It does not establish continuing authority after cessation, later compensation, or a hidden appointment right. The exact legal company and the dated role are the useful pieces of evidence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e87"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Initial director/PSC; both roles ceased November 7, 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e87"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former director / voting controller",
            "sourceName": "Nicolas Moës",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "2023-08-22–2023-11-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "leahy",
      "label": "Connor Leahy",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Conjecture cofounder; moved to ControlAI US in March 2026.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/leahy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "leahy",
        "name": "Connor Leahy",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Conjecture cofounder; moved to ControlAI US in March 2026.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Conjecture cofounder; moved to ControlAI US in March 2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Connor Leahy is a co-founder of EleutherAI and Conjecture who announced his move to ControlAI US in March 2026. His public career connects open-source AI research, a venture-backed safety company and a campaign to prohibit superintelligence.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical founding history and political advocacy",
        "significance": "Leahy connects the histories of EleutherAI and Conjecture to ControlAI’s US leadership and public campaigning. That career path is important for understanding how a technical AI community also produces advocates for restricting advanced AI development.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The path from building models to political campaigning",
            "text": "Conjecture’s April 2022 launch named Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour as founders, with much of the early team drawn from EleutherAI. It described an alignment-research mission and disclosed venture investors. In his 26 March 2026 retrospective, Leahy described the company’s unsuccessful technical and product effort and announced that he was joining ControlAI US. This is a documented personnel and strategic transition; the earlier investors are not thereby established as ControlAI donors.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Conjecture: original launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              },
              {
                "title": "Leahy: Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The disagreement within the AI-safety world",
            "text": "The public break established by the retained research concerns parts of the effective-altruism and technical-safety community. A signed Conjecture leadership response in June 2023 criticised support for AGI laboratories and advocated stopping superintelligence development. Leahy later debated accelerationist Guillaume Verdon. Open-source origins, effective altruism and effective accelerationism are different affiliations; the research did not establish that Leahy had previously belonged to e/acc.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Contemporaneous dispute and Conjecture response",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture"
              },
              {
                "title": "MLST: Leahy–Verdon debate",
                "url": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/showdown-between-e-acc-leader-and-doomer-connor-leahy/id1510472996?i=1000644059086"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e93"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              },
              {
                "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Conjecture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder",
            "sourceName": "Connor Leahy",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022 launch; historical"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "March 2026 retrospective announced transition following Conjecture operational ending.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e91"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "US Executive Director",
            "sourceName": "Connor Leahy",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2026-03 onward"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Connor Leahy appears in the lobbyist lists of both first-half 2026 reports.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-leahy-lobbyist"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
            "sourceName": "Connor Leahy",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-leahy-endorses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
                "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
            "sourceName": "Connor Leahy",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "heading": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "text": "The initial registration became effective July 1, 2025 and names Max Hernandez-Zapata, disclosing his earlier job as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins. Connor Leahy appears alongside him in both 2026 quarterly reports. Nathan Morrison’s March19 registration identifies a consulting relationship with Control AI US; the second-quarter report also names him.",
            "matched": [
              "Connor Leahy",
              "Leahy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "bdaf7ffd8d3608b9c782889c0e313fb89caeebb1a938003fd7699e1a496051d1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Most consequential findings",
            "text": "The bridge persists through people with current ControlAI roles: its about page identifies Conjecture cofounder Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, and Conjecture cofounder Gabriel Alfour as an adviser who helped Andrea establish ControlAI. The same page lists former UK Defence Secretary Des Browne as adviser, identifying his Nuclear Threat Initiative and European Leadership Network leadership. These are specific organizational access channels; their outside institutions are not thereby ControlAI funders or endorsers. [M05]",
            "matched": [
              "Connor Leahy",
              "Leahy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2c8dbe0028602cee20f56f27756ed82784007070351ec7300baf6c695d4a317"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Later status correction from the parallel root investigation",
            "text": "Root independently read Connor Leahy's first-person retrospective dated 26 March 2026: https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective . Leahy describes the Conjecture chapter as ended, says its technical/product effort failed, and announces his move to ControlAI US in Washington. This follow-up therefore treats Conjecture employment and investment as historical; the June 2025 adviser title does not establish a continuing September 2026 role. Root also records Leahy's account of growing disagreement with effective altruism. Shared earlier networks should not be presented as a uniformly coordinated current bloc. Read status: source read in the parallel root investigation, not independently opened in this subagent's final bounded pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Connor Leahy",
              "Leahy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b2ab1facfe0aebac137b5d554f976f02a5efbb300e6ab500bd06dc3312aa2dc9"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "What would change this assessment",
            "text": "Targeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.",
            "matched": [
              "Leahy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "98ce2205f3b3a945417e049a053a3ad02c3fbdfd6ce1aad92d21b892ab789337"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture — Our story",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
            "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture: original launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Contemporaneous dispute and Conjecture response",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture"
          },
          {
            "title": "MLST: Leahy–Verdon debate",
            "url": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/showdown-between-e-acc-leader-and-doomer-connor-leahy/id1510472996?i=1000644059086"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Connor Leahy is an AI builder turned campaign leader. A co-founder of EleutherAI and Conjecture, he announced his move to ControlAI US in March 2026. His trajectory connects open-source model development, a venture-backed alignment company and advocacy for binding restrictions on superintelligence.",
          "structuralRole": "Carries technical experience into mass persuasion and organizing",
          "significance": "Leahy is an important bridge because he can speak as a former builder while arguing for political intervention. His career also shows a substantive split within AI-safety circles over whether technical research and continued development can deliver safety.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Leahy helped found EleutherAI and then Conjecture, which launched in 2022 to work on AI alignment. Conjecture’s announcement named Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour as founders, described a team with substantial EleutherAI experience and disclosed venture backing. It was an attempt to solve the problem by building an organization capable of technical research and product development.",
            "His March 2026 retrospective described that effort’s unsuccessful technical and commercial course and its operational ending. He announced that he was joining ControlAI US. That move gives the present campaign part of its character: people who tried to build safer AI institutions are now arguing that political restrictions must carry work they believe technical development cannot complete in time.",
            "The disagreement had surfaced earlier. In a signed June 2023 response, Conjecture’s leadership criticized parts of the effective-altruism and AI-safety community for supporting advanced-AI laboratories and argued for stopping superintelligence development. Leahy later debated accelerationist Guillaume Verdon. His early open-source involvement and his later restriction advocacy form a real strategic change, rather than a simple story of two permanently separate camps.",
            "Within the current network, Leahy connects that technical history to ControlAI’s organizational capacity and public campaigning. His arguments travel through interviews, debates and the campaign’s broader outreach. Understanding his role means considering both the ideas he promotes and the institution now supporting their political use.",
            "US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
              "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
            },
            {
              "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
              "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
            },
            {
              "title": "Contemporaneous dispute and Conjecture response",
              "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture"
            },
            {
              "title": "ControlAI team",
              "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
            },
            {
              "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
              "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
              "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "alfour",
      "label": "Gabriel Alfour",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Conjecture cofounder; ControlAI founding assistance and adviser.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/alfour",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "alfour",
        "name": "Gabriel Alfour",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Conjecture cofounder; ControlAI founding assistance and adviser.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Conjecture cofounder; ControlAI founding assistance and adviser."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Gabriel Alfour co-founded Conjecture and is listed by ControlAI as an adviser who helped Andrea Miotti establish the organisation. He also co-authored a November 2025 proposal for middle-power governments to constrain artificial-superintelligence development.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical-company experience carried into policy design",
        "significance": "Alfour connects three activities: building an AI-safety company, helping establish an advocacy organisation, and writing proposals for state action. That is a personnel and ideas pathway with a specific institutional history, rather than proof that the company’s investors financed the campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented trajectory",
            "text": "Conjecture’s 2022 launch names Alfour alongside Connor Leahy and Sid Black. ControlAI attributes founding assistance to him, while the middle-powers paper names him with Miotti, Eva Behrens and Alex Amadori. Its proposed tools include export controls, sanctions and specified self-defence red lines. Authorship establishes participation in that policy argument, not governmental acceptance of it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              },
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              },
              {
                "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
                "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e92",
              "e94",
              "e115"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e115"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
                "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Gabriel Alfour",
            "targetName": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "date": "2025-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e94"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              },
              {
                "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Conjecture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder",
            "sourceName": "Gabriel Alfour",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022 launch; historical"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Organization says he helped Andrea establish ControlAI. No money transfer established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e92"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adviser; founding assistance",
            "sourceName": "Gabriel Alfour",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Most consequential findings",
            "text": "The bridge persists through people with current ControlAI roles: its about page identifies Conjecture cofounder Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, and Conjecture cofounder Gabriel Alfour as an adviser who helped Andrea establish ControlAI. The same page lists former UK Defence Secretary Des Browne as adviser, identifying his Nuclear Threat Initiative and European Leadership Network leadership. These are specific organizational access channels; their outside institutions are not thereby ControlAI funders or endorsers. [M05]",
            "matched": [
              "Gabriel Alfour",
              "Alfour"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2c8dbe0028602cee20f56f27756ed82784007070351ec7300baf6c695d4a317"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "winga",
      "label": "Max Winga",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A ControlAI creator-outreach and systems lead who also appeared as a past Frame Fellowship mentor.",
      "aliases": [
        "Max"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Creator outreach & systems"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/winga",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "winga",
        "name": "Max Winga",
        "role": "Creator outreach & systems",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A ControlAI creator-outreach and systems lead who also appeared as a past Frame Fellowship mentor.",
        "why": "His role is an operational connection between advocacy organisations and people who produce public-facing AI content.",
        "about": [
          "Creator recruitment, briefing and production support can shape what reaches an audience. Winga’s role and mentoring connection establish participation in that process; they do not make him the source of every policy position or funding decision."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Max"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Max Winga is ControlAI’s Creator Outreach & Systems Lead. His documented background runs from engineering physics and AI research to creator partnerships, public AI-risk messaging and political advocacy.",
        "structuralRole": "Bridge between AI research, advocacy and creators",
        "significance": "Winga matters because he works where technical AI-risk arguments become public communication and political mobilisation. His ControlAI outreach role, past Frame mentorship and recorded call for government action connect three parts of that process. This makes him an operational bridge worth following even though this map currently records only two direct relationships.",
        "background": [
          "Creator recruitment, briefing and production support can shape what reaches an audience. Winga’s role and mentoring connection establish participation in that process; they do not make him the source of every policy position or funding decision."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From engineering physics to AI advocacy",
            "text": "The AI Treaty signatory list identifies Winga as an AI research engineer at Conjecture and describes his education as Engineering Physics 2024, with highest honours, at the University of Illinois. The university’s Selvin Lab independently lists him among its alumni. These are historical biographical records; they do not supply exact Conjecture employment dates.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Treaty: historical signatory biography",
                "url": "https://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign"
              },
              {
                "title": "University of Illinois: Selvin Lab alumni",
                "url": "https://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "His stated reason for turning to politics",
            "text": "In ControlAI’s 16 July 2025 podcast, around 46:10, Winga says he previously worked on technical AI-safety research and expects dangerous systems to arrive before adequate technical solutions. He therefore argues that governments need to intervene. In the same passage he directs US and UK viewers to ControlAI’s tools for contacting political representatives. This records both his stated rationale and a concrete route from an audience to lawmakers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI podcast: transcript, 46:10 onward",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "How the creator connection works",
            "text": "ControlAI lists his current outreach-and-systems role. Frame lists him as a past mentor, describes his communications and partnership work, and names SciShow and Rational Animations in that description. These are practical roles in reaching audiences: working with communicators, supporting content and connecting creators to an advocacy organisation. The publications do not disclose his personal contract-signing authority or the payment terms of particular collaborations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI: team roster",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Frame: past mentor biography",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "What he publicly believes",
            "text": "On his own newsletter’s About page, Winga presents advanced AI as an urgent extinction risk and describes AI safety as a life commitment. That is his public position. It helps explain his advocacy without requiring speculation about his private motives.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Winga: Vibe Function Collapse, About",
                "url": "https://maxwinga.substack.com/about"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "What would establish his decision power",
            "text": "The remaining questions concern his delegated budget, commissioning authority, selection criteria and actual involvement in approving an output. The retained investigation did not obtain those instruments, his compensation, a donor role or legal control of ControlAI. Those gaps are specific to decision authority; they do not erase the documented research, mentorship and outreach roles.",
            "sources": [],
            "noteIds": [],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Update: the Sabine approach is identified",
            "text": "ControlAI identifies itself behind the approach Hossenfelder described. It disputes her account of editorial demands. Read the dedicated account for both positions and the missing correspondence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              },
              {
                "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Program lists Winga with ControlAI. Shared training infrastructure, not ControlAI funding to Frame.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e82"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Past mentor",
            "sourceName": "Max Winga",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Past cohort; read 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Max Winga coauthored the September 8 explanation and is the programme’s listed contact.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-winga-outreach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Outreach lead; coauthors public account",
            "sourceName": "Max Winga",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-winga-endorses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
                "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
            "sourceName": "Max Winga",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Organization biography at cutoff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e83"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Creator Outreach & Systems Lead",
            "sourceName": "Max Winga",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-max-winga-followup",
            "title": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "Interpretation: Winga is a professional bridge between technical AI-safety networks, NGO advocacy, creator partnerships and public mobilization. No donor role, legal control, budget size, individual compensation, contract-signing authority or Conjecture-to-ControlAI money transfer was established. His work is relevant to how messages are produced and distributed, while the underlying financial control remains a separate question.",
            "matched": [
              "Winga"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "083827f7b79974f982a473a2548dfea6ad8612a1202ae08aa96a6aa00dc33d5e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-max-winga-followup",
            "title": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "His February17 2026 essay 'You're an AI Expert – Not an Influencer' discusses credibility, professional roles, avoiding distracting partisan commentary and protecting a broadly repeatable AI-risk message. Original LessWrong and GreaterWrong fetches failed; the text was inspected in its published audio/transcript distribution. Do not claim original-page access. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer https://podscan.fm/podcasts/lesswrong-curated-amp-popular/episodes/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga-1 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga/id1630783021?i=1000750579675",
            "matched": [
              "Winga"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "039d1e296b0656699a52f531fb22a371a6ae242256ff29561a21b141dec61d34"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "heading": "The important update",
            "text": "On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved . Andrea Miotti and Max Winga’s response disputes her description and says the negotiations went through her manager. ControlAI’s response",
            "matched": [
              "Max Winga",
              "Winga"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cab5f6f86c8d41012e2eefd62f11e7e9bdcc2b425fc532485a83729d02672e6c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Policy collaboration, separately from authority",
            "text": "Apart Research's June 2025 sprint is stronger evidence of institutional cooperation than a shared conference panel: it presented a ControlAI policy stress test, with ControlAI personnel including Adam Shimi, Max Winga and Tolga Bilge helping organize or judge, and Miotti giving the keynote. It links the policy-development and communications personnel operationally; it is not proof of a funding transfer between the organizations. [M03]",
            "matched": [
              "Max Winga",
              "Winga"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "24e1c299fc5e7527b48683173a5f64e7e439704a3629fb8013d0aa36a2cee558"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
            "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Treaty: historical signatory biography",
            "url": "https://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign"
          },
          {
            "title": "University of Illinois: Selvin Lab alumni",
            "url": "https://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI podcast: transcript, 46:10 onward",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku"
          },
          {
            "title": "Max Winga: Vibe Function Collapse, About",
            "url": "https://maxwinga.substack.com/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Max Winga is ControlAI’s Creator Outreach & Systems Lead, with a background in engineering physics and AI research. He works where technical arguments become public communication: creator partnerships, production support and calls for audiences to contact political representatives. Frame also lists him as a past mentor.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects technical arguments, creators and political mobilization",
          "significance": "Winga’s significance is operational. A small number of direct graph links can connect large audiences to a campaign: his work sits at the handoff between specialist AI-risk organizations and people who communicate with the public.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Winga’s documented background includes engineering physics at the University of Illinois and AI research at Conjecture. The AI Treaty signatory biography describes a 2024 engineering-physics qualification with highest honours, while the university’s Selvin Lab lists him among its alumni. That history gives context to his movement from technical work into advocacy.",
            "He has explained the move in his own words. In a July 2025 ControlAI podcast, he said he expected dangerous AI systems to arrive before adequate technical solutions and argued that governments needed to intervene. In the same discussion he directed UK and US viewers toward tools for contacting their representatives. The sequence is revealing: a technical assessment becomes a political conclusion, then an action the audience is asked to take.",
            "ControlAI now identifies him as its creator-outreach and systems lead. Frame’s past-mentor biography describes communications and partnership work and names SciShow and Rational Animations. Fellowship mentoring, support for creators and relationships with established channels can enlarge the reach of a campaign without its staff having to build every audience themselves.",
            "Winga coauthored ControlAI’s September 8 account of its creator outreach with Andrea Miotti. The organization identified itself behind Sabine Hossenfelder’s reported approach while contesting her description of the editorial conditions. His profile therefore reaches beyond a job title: he is a named participant in the practical process that first brought this investigation into view."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "University of Illinois: Selvin Lab alumni",
              "url": "https://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/"
            },
            {
              "title": "ControlAI podcast: transcript, 46:10 onward",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku"
            },
            {
              "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
              "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
            },
            {
              "title": "ControlAI's Creator Outreach",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
            },
            {
              "title": "AI Treaty: historical signatory biography",
              "url": "https://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "conjecture",
      "label": "Conjecture",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A venture-backed company founded in 2022 to work on AI alignment: making advanced systems behave as intended.",
      "aliases": [
        "Connor Leahy"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "AI-alignment company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/conjecture",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "conjecture",
        "name": "Conjecture",
        "role": "AI-alignment company",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A venture-backed company founded in 2022 to work on AI alignment: making advanced systems behave as intended.",
        "why": "It is a former professional home for people who later worked in ControlAI. This is a personnel connection, not evidence that the two organisations are the same body.",
        "about": [
          "Andrea Miotti worked on policy and strategy; Eva Behrens described operations work. Connor Leahy later described Conjecture’s operational ending in March 2026. That account should not be confused with a verified corporate dissolution."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Connor Leahy"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A venture-backed company founded in 2022 to work on AI alignment: making advanced systems behave as intended.",
        "structuralRole": "An AI company in the campaign’s personnel history",
        "significance": "Conjecture supplies a documented professional and founding connection for several people later associated with ControlAI. Its historical investor disclosures and staff roles identify different kinds of relationships; the retained record does not show that those investors financed ControlAI through the company.",
        "background": [
          "Andrea Miotti worked on policy and strategy; Eva Behrens described operations work. Connor Leahy later described Conjecture’s operational ending in March 2026. That account should not be confused with a verified corporate dissolution."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Launch names Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown. No onward ControlAI transfer documented.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e95"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Conjecture's 2022 venture backers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed 2022 venture backing",
            "sourceName": "Conjecture's 2022 venture backers",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2025 parliamentary biography describes former Head of Strategy and Governance. 2022 title was Head of AI Policy and Governance; not founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e96"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Andrea Miotti",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former policy / strategy leadership",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022–2025 professional record"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Self-description and May 2025 privacy notice. Conjecture work subsequently ended operationally per Leahy; no current continuity inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e97"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              },
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operations work in 2025",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e93"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
                "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
              },
              {
                "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Connor Leahy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder",
            "sourceName": "Connor Leahy",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022 launch; historical"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s investment vehicle Metaplanet lists Conjecture in its portfolio with a 2022 entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-conjecture"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
                "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Metaplanet portfolio connection",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "5. Conjecture resources and personnel transition",
            "text": "Leahy describes Conjecture's investor-backed founding, technical research, product pivot and failures, and announces joining ControlAI US. He credits an initial investor by first name, Nat, but supplies no new ControlAI donor identity or transfer. This supports a personnel/intellectual trajectory, not a financial merger, assignment of assets or continuing Conjecture-funded payroll.",
            "matched": [
              "Conjecture"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "eea068cdfa8e3fb279e76eef1d599934ed2e6f9b0a91ccd01c4b261084c5a0b4"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-conjecture-factions",
            "title": "Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks",
            "heading": "Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks",
            "text": "The supported sequence is: EleutherAI/open-source roots; a safety-focused startup with venture investors; discussions and later conflict with parts of the EA/technical-safety community; public opposition to e/acc; then Leahy's transition into ControlAI. No reviewed primary statement establishes that Conjecture or Leahy was formerly an e/acc member. A break with EA is explicitly attested. These labels must remain distinct.",
            "matched": [
              "Conjecture"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "71d98fe0192f1506b6c425a02ecebad6eef6bfc4108b1bbec1d164d009089466"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "5. Conjecture resources and personnel transition",
            "text": "New corroboration for previous Behrens findings: https://www.talosnetwork.org/perspectives/alumni-newsletter-october-2025 . Opened/read, dated October14,2025, author David Conrad. Latest Publications explicitly identifies Behrens as Summer2022 alumna and reports Conjecture/ControlAI coauthorship. This upgrades the earlier indexed-only Talos cohort observation to a read primary publisher source; no fellowship payment or donor earmark follows from it.",
            "matched": [
              "Conjecture"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8a0a1bd8fd5c6a6307939202b62f645dcabe8eab6645c7faf16dd8eb9dd3110c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-conjecture-controlai-pathways",
            "title": "Conjecture's faction history and ControlAI's policy pathways",
            "heading": "Completed workstreams",
            "text": "Conjecture chronology and faction evidence : the documented rupture is with parts of core EA, contemporaneously visible in June 2023. The reviewed e/acc connection is public disagreement. No earlier e/acc membership, departure, or investor withdrawal was established.",
            "matched": [
              "Conjecture"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "14ba8150326e9f8240d0453f4ee94242b6fc5c5f30289250d0d256903b7f5ebf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
            "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Conjecture was founded in 2022 as a venture-backed AI-alignment company. Several people later central to ControlAI worked there, including Connor Leahy, Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens. Leahy’s March 2026 retrospective described the company’s operational ending and his move into ControlAI US.",
          "structuralRole": "A shared technical and organizational origin for campaign leaders",
          "significance": "Conjecture helps explain how people, experience and ideas moved from an attempt to build safer AI into political advocacy. Its history supplies a substantive institutional connection behind several of ControlAI’s current relationships.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Conjecture launched in April 2022 with Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour named as founders. Much of its early team came from EleutherAI. Its declared mission was AI alignment, and it disclosed venture backing from well-known technology investors and founders. This was an effort to organize technical research and commercial development around the problem of making advanced systems behave as intended.",
            "Several later ControlAI figures worked inside that effort. Miotti held AI-policy, strategy and governance responsibilities; Behrens described operations work. Winga’s historical biography identifies him as an AI research engineer at Conjecture. These roles explain a practical transfer of experience: research, administration, policy and public communication did not have to be assembled from strangers when people moved into campaigning.",
            "The strategic disagreement was explicit by June 2023, when Conjecture’s leadership criticized parts of the effective-altruism and technical-safety community for supporting advanced-AI laboratories. Its response argued for stopping superintelligence development. Leahy’s March 2026 retrospective later described unsuccessful technical and product efforts, the operational ending of Conjecture and his move to ControlAI US.",
            "Tallinn’s investment vehicle Metaplanet lists Conjecture in its portfolio, adding a commercial relationship to the donor connections elsewhere in the network. For readers, the central point is the organization’s historical role: it gathered a team, resources and a view of AI risk, and several of those people subsequently pursued a political answer through different institutions."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
              "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
            },
            {
              "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
              "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
            },
            {
              "title": "Contemporaneous dispute and Conjecture response",
              "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture"
            },
            {
              "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
              "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
              "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "controlaius",
      "label": "Control AI US Inc",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Distinct US organization, described as 501(c)(4). Full board and UK-US transfer arrangements not established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/controlaius",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "controlaius",
        "name": "Control AI US Inc",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Distinct US organization, described as 501(c)(4). Full board and UK-US transfer arrangements not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Distinct US organization, described as 501(c)(4). Full board and UK-US transfer arrangements not established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Control AI US Inc is the US organisation associated with the ControlAI campaign, described as a 501(c)(4) social-welfare organisation. Its US tax filing and German lobbying registration provide records of its own activity; it is separate from Secure Future Research in the UK.",
        "structuralRole": "A separate US advocacy organisation",
        "significance": "The US organisation is an important legal boundary in the ControlAI network. Its filings and lobbying records concern its own representatives, finances and obligations. Reading the UK and US organisations separately makes actual inter-entity arrangements visible instead of assuming a single balance sheet.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Balde names Control AI US as its client in the official R007864 version2 declaration valid from 16 March 2026. Rechecked against official JSON on 8 September 2026; this is the same declaration, not independent corroboration. Zero client receipts refer to 2025 and do not establish 2026 payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e98"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
              },
              {
                "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Amir Benjamin Balde",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissioned German lobbying",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Amir Benjamin Balde",
            "date": "Registered March 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Counterparty and liability basis unresolved; no UK-US transfer edge earned. Financial details: value: 20,955; currency: USD; kind: year-end liability stock, not payment or annual funding flow; period: Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-controlai-e-us-payable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Unnamed related organisation owed by Control AI US",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports amount due to",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Unnamed related organisation owed by Control AI US",
            "date": "Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The US filings identify Secure Future Research Ltd in their foreign-entity disclosures; the quarterly narrative calls its interest generalized. This is a specific disclosed UK-US link. The form provides several alternative grounds for listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-sfr-foreign-interest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed foreign-entity interest in lobbying",
            "sourceName": "Secure Future Research",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Reports 6 hours/week and zero compensation, benefits and allowances; named books custodian. Does not establish current exclusive authority or erase later officers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-controlai-e-miotti-us-officer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Andrea Miotti",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported president treasurer and secretary",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2025-02-04 through 2025-12-31; return signed 2026-06-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Both quarterly reports name the Senate and House as lobbying audiences; neither identifies the officials contacted or attributes legislative wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-congress-lobbying"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "US Congress — reported lobbying audience",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports lobbying on ASI and loss-of-control risks",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "US Congress — reported lobbying audience",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The initial registration discloses prior congressional staff employment; both quarterly reports identify Hernandez-Zapata as a lobbyist.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-max-lobbyist"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
            "sourceName": "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Control AI US reports USD120,000 for Q1 2026 under Method A. The figure is a rounded expense estimate, not a donation to a politician.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-q1-expenses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Q1 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports USD120,000 lobbying expenses",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Q1 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Control AI US reports USD80,000 for Q2 2026 under Method A. Keep the period separate from the July17 filing date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-q2-expenses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Q2 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports USD80,000 lobbying expenses",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Q2 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "date": "2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Governance and the financial boundary",
            "text": "Control AI US Inc is separately identified in Germany's lobby register, where Miotti is CEO/authorized representative. The US board and inter-entity agreements were not established by this pass. [L04]",
            "matched": [
              "Control AI US Inc"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "435cb450a6a68e39a76cb5f015ab05cbe5ee7c76aec4e270c8a213991c6f68d8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Creator and policy mechanism",
            "text": "Germany provides a concrete contracted lobbying edge: CONTROL AI US INC is registered R007795 (first entry 19 Jan 2026; last update 16 Mar 2026), operating in its own interest through third parties. Consultant Amir Benjamin Balde's register R007864 identifies Control AI US INC as his client for political education on existential AI risks. His filing lists 0 euros received for that client during calendar 2025; this does not establish zero compensation in 2026. The organization's German financial fields still state no fully completed financial year; this is the registry's disclosed state, and should not be generalized after a 2025 US tax-return summary has surfaced elsewhere.",
            "matched": [
              "Control AI US Inc"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "221886a98f020d5613bd7ec86adc355adf8f43eb7e508d96592851ae2769db98"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          },
          {
            "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Control AI US Inc is the US organization associated with the ControlAI campaign and is described as a 501(c)(4) social-welfare organization. Connor Leahy announced his move into its leadership in March 2026. Its records include US tax reporting and registered lobbying activity in Germany.",
          "structuralRole": "A separate legal organization for international campaigning",
          "significance": "The US entity expands the campaign’s institutional reach. Its officer records, representatives and lobbying client relationships identify concrete responsibilities that would disappear if every activity were attributed simply to the ControlAI brand.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Control AI US Inc provides an organizational home for part of ControlAI’s political work. In March 2026, Connor Leahy announced that he was joining it after Conjecture’s operational ending. The retained initial US tax filing reports Andrea Miotti as president, treasurer and secretary for that reporting period.",
            "Its activity extends beyond the United States. Germany’s lobbying register identifies the US organization and its authorized representation. A separate filing names it as the client of Amir Benjamin Balde, giving the investigation a specific commissioned lobbying relationship to follow.",
            "The US filing also records a year-end amount due to a related organization, without identifying that counterparty. A fuller account of the campaign’s international finances therefore requires each legal organization’s own agreements and accounts. The current records already show why the US body matters: it carries representatives, activities and obligations in its own name.",
            "US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
              "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
            },
            {
              "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
              "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
            },
            {
              "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
              "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
            },
            {
              "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
              "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
              "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "balde",
      "label": "Amir Benjamin Balde",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Registered commissioned lobbyist for Control AI US in Germany; 2026 compensation unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/balde",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "balde",
        "name": "Amir Benjamin Balde",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Registered commissioned lobbyist for Control AI US in Germany; 2026 compensation unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Registered commissioned lobbyist for Control AI US in Germany; 2026 compensation unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Amir Benjamin Balde is the commissioned lobbyist who named Control AI US Inc as a client in Germany’s official lobbying register. This is a documented representation arrangement for the US organisation, not merely a shared supporter listing.",
        "structuralRole": "A formal route into German lobbying",
        "significance": "Balde supplies a particularly concrete intermediary: a named client and a registered lobbying relationship. That makes the German register a place to follow representation, declared activity and later financial disclosures. The US client must remain distinct from ControlAI’s UK operating company.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Why the reporting year matters",
            "text": "The retained declaration is registration R007864, version 2, valid from 16 March 2026 and rechecked in September. Its zero client receipts refer to 2025. They do not establish that the 2026 engagement was unpaid, nor provide the 2026 fee or contract terms.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
              },
              {
                "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e98"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Balde names Control AI US as its client in the official R007864 version2 declaration valid from 16 March 2026. Rechecked against official JSON on 8 September 2026; this is the same declaration, not independent corroboration. Zero client receipts refer to 2025 and do not establish 2026 payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e98"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
              },
              {
                "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissioned German lobbying",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Amir Benjamin Balde",
            "date": "Registered March 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "German declarations refreshed, no new payment figures",
            "text": "Balde's zero financial figures refer to calendar 2025 ; they do not show whether 2026 lobbying was paid. ControlAI's register finance declarations still say no completed fiscal year. The newly acquired US return provides a completed 2025 tax period and was signed later, inJune. These are different dated filings; this pass does not infer a false statement or legal reporting breach. No new donor names,2026 compensation or contract terms were obtained.",
            "matched": [
              "Balde"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7abb60d9a2fc62e4b462b37cf2f81305b54a80a3d1a519bb5c67ae37505608d4"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Creator and policy mechanism",
            "text": "Germany provides a concrete contracted lobbying edge: CONTROL AI US INC is registered R007795 (first entry 19 Jan 2026; last update 16 Mar 2026), operating in its own interest through third parties. Consultant Amir Benjamin Balde's register R007864 identifies Control AI US INC as his client for political education on existential AI risks. His filing lists 0 euros received for that client during calendar 2025; this does not establish zero compensation in 2026. The organization's German financial fields still state no fully completed financial year; this is the registry's disclosed state, and should not be generalized after a 2025 US tax-return summary has surfaced elsewhere.",
            "matched": [
              "Amir Benjamin Balde",
              "Balde"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "221886a98f020d5613bd7ec86adc355adf8f43eb7e508d96592851ae2769db98"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "controlcreators",
      "label": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Organization reports paid and unpaid collaborations; outreach role includes briefing/script drafting/review.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/controlcreators",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "controlcreators",
        "name": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Organization reports paid and unpaid collaborations; outreach role includes briefing/script drafting/review.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Organization reports paid and unpaid collaborations; outreach role includes briefing/script drafting/review."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
            "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ControlAI’s creator-partnership operation recruits and works with people who communicate AI issues to public audiences. Its published plan describes both paid and unpaid collaborations, while a staff advertisement describes briefing partners and helping draft or review scripts.",
        "structuralRole": "Turning campaign arguments into audience contact",
        "significance": "This operation is where the campaign’s policy case meets an existing creator audience. Recruitment, briefings, production help and advertising can increase reach; the stated political pathway then directs supporters toward contacting lawmakers. The terms of a particular collaboration determine how much editorial authority the organisation actually holds.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed activity and the missing contract detail",
            "text": "The April 2026 plan reported 14 collaborations, including Hank Green and Rational Animations, without assigning a payment category or amount to each. The outreach job’s £60,000–£80,000 advertised salary concerns an employee, not creator fees. The plan describes a route from creator exposure to lawmaker-contact tools and supporter lists; it does not quantify the resulting change in legislative decisions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
                "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e99",
              "e100",
              "e102"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI describes creator/advertising work leading to lawmaker-contact tools and supporter lists. Intended mechanism; no causal attribution to a specific parliamentary act established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e102"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Parliament",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "described an intended constituent-pressure pathway to",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2026-04-20 plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Employer posting describes partner recruitment, briefings and script work focused on extinction risk. £60k–£80k salary is advertised employee pay, not creator fees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e100"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
                "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefing and script drafting/review",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "date": "Posting read 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "April 20 plan reports 14 collaborations, including Hank Green and Rational Animations. Individual paid/free classification, amounts and contractual rights not disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e99"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Paid + unpaid creator collaborations",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "date": "2026-04-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
            "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ukparliament",
      "label": "UK Parliament",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Recorded access, debates and proposed measures. MPs/peers are not interchangeable with executive government.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ukparliament",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ukparliament",
        "name": "UK Parliament",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Recorded access, debates and proposed measures. MPs/peers are not interchangeable with executive government.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recorded access, debates and proposed measures. MPs/peers are not interchangeable with executive government."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
            "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
            "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UK Parliament is the legislature in which the investigation follows AI proposals, debates, written evidence and age-assurance amendments. It includes individual parliamentarians with different powers and positions; a campaign’s access to them is not the same as executive-government sponsorship.",
        "structuralRole": "Where advocacy can become legislative action",
        "significance": "Parliament provides several possible conversion points: a briefing can inform a question, an ally can sponsor an amendment, and a proposal can enter a formal procedure. Following those steps separately shows where an outside campaign has achieved access and where an actual legal change still requires evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access and outcomes have different records",
            "text": "ControlAI describes briefings, introductions, supporter recruitment and drafting work. Parliamentary records separately document Miotti’s submitted evidence, Browne’s testimony, and particular proposals. The Lords agreed age-assurance Amendment 124 in July 2023; the AI measures in this record have their own, different procedural statuses. The recorded September 2026 schedule for Sobel was an opportunity to seek leave for a bill, not proof of passage.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
                "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
              },
              {
                "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
              },
              {
                "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
                "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
              },
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e101",
              "e102",
              "e106",
              "e107",
              "e109",
              "w7-adv-e-agreed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI describes creator/advertising work leading to lawmaker-contact tools and supporter lists. Intended mechanism; no causal attribution to a specific parliamentary act established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e102"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "described an intended constituent-pressure pathway to",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI creator partnerships",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2026-04-20 plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published Direct Institutional Plan and impact report describe introductions, dinners, briefings, signatures and public statements; claimed conversion effects not independently audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e101"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
                "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefings, support requests, drafting",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2024–2026 reported strategy/activity"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The Lords agreed Amendment 124 on 10 July 2023. It set age-assurance principles for Ofcom, including proportionate effectiveness, age ranges, AADC standards and interoperability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-agreed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed amendment",
            "sourceName": "UK Parliament",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
            "date": "10 July 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official schedule is for a ten-minute-rule motion. At original Sep 5 cutoff not introduced/passed; exact introduced bill text not verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e109"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
                "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alex Sobel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was scheduled to seek leave for an ASI bill in",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2026-09-08 scheduled"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "September 2025 parliamentary source establishes submitted material and biography, not enacted recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e107"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Andrea Miotti",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Written evidence / professional biography",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2025-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Retirement recorded February 23, 2026. Do not display as current peer participation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e106"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Des Browne",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former member of House of Lords",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "Until 2026-02-23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
            "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
            "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "browne",
      "label": "Des Browne",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Former UK Defence Secretary; ControlAI adviser. Retired from Lords 23 February 2026.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/browne",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "browne",
        "name": "Des Browne",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Former UK Defence Secretary; ControlAI adviser. Retired from Lords 23 February 2026.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Former UK Defence Secretary; ControlAI adviser. Retired from Lords 23 February 2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Des Browne is a former UK Defence Secretary and former member of the House of Lords who appears as a ControlAI adviser. His parliamentary membership ended on 23 February 2026. His earlier security-policy work also connects him to the Nuclear Threat Initiative.",
        "structuralRole": "Security-policy experience and parliamentary access",
        "significance": "Browne is relevant because the evidence reaches beyond a shared supporter list: his own testimony describes advocacy organisations contacting him and encouraging parliamentary questions. This shows one practical route by which specialist campaigning can enter parliamentary scrutiny through an experienced political intermediary.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A directly described channel of influence",
            "text": "In March 2025 committee testimony, Browne said ControlAI and Logically regularly emailed him and encouraged questions. His later advisory listing is a separate organisational connection. Older records show a 2015 article republished by the World Economic Forum and an NTI vice-chair role in 2017; neither establishes a current WEF role or a ControlAI funding relationship.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
              },
              {
                "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
              },
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e103",
              "e104",
              "e106",
              "e141",
              "e142"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Browne's own March 2025 committee testimony says ControlAI and Logically regularly emailed and encouraged questions. No payment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e104"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Emails encouraging parliamentary questions",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Des Browne",
            "date": "2025-03-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2015 Project Syndicate republication on WEF; WEF disclaimer of endorsement. Publication relation, not appointment or ControlAI partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e141"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Economic Forum",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthored republished article",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "World Economic Forum",
            "date": "2015-03-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report names institutional role but does not establish Browne attended or organized the cited WEF roundtable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e142"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Vice-chair in 2017 event report",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
            "date": "2017"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current organizational advisory role; former UK Defence Secretary. Lords membership ended February 23, 2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e103"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI team",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adviser",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Retirement recorded February 23, 2026. Do not display as current peer participation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e106"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Parliament",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former member of House of Lords",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "Until 2026-02-23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Most consequential findings",
            "text": "The bridge persists through people with current ControlAI roles: its about page identifies Conjecture cofounder Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, and Conjecture cofounder Gabriel Alfour as an adviser who helped Andrea establish ControlAI. The same page lists former UK Defence Secretary Des Browne as adviser, identifying his Nuclear Threat Initiative and European Leadership Network leadership. These are specific organizational access channels; their outside institutions are not thereby ControlAI funders or endorsers. [M05]",
            "matched": [
              "Des Browne",
              "Browne"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2c8dbe0028602cee20f56f27756ed82784007070351ec7300baf6c695d4a317"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "hunt",
      "label": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Acknowledged ControlAI support in January 2026 debate; Amendment 84 sponsor.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/hunt",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "hunt",
        "name": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Acknowledged ControlAI support in January 2026 debate; Amendment 84 sponsor.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Acknowledged ControlAI support in January 2026 debate; Amendment 84 sponsor."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath is a parliamentarian who acknowledged ControlAI’s support when opening a January 2026 debate on a superintelligence moratorium. He later appeared as a sponsor of the July 2026 emergency-shutdown amendment.",
        "structuralRole": "Public acknowledgment followed by legislative sponsorship",
        "significance": "Hunt provides a visible route from an outside campaign into parliamentary discussion and a concrete proposal. His acknowledgment is stronger evidence of contact and assistance than a shared event listing, but it does not establish the amount, contractual form or public funding of that support.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Recorded steps in the relationship",
            "text": "He thanked ControlAI in the Lords on 29 January 2026. The later Amendment 84 record identifies him among its sponsors and marks the measure “Not moved.” The combination establishes parliamentary uptake of a campaign issue without implying that the proposed powers became law.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e105",
              "e112"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Hunt thanked ControlAI when opening superintelligence moratorium debate; uptake rather than government adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e105"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Support acknowledged in Lords debate",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath",
            "date": "2026-01-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Other sponsors Clement-Jones and Harding. Official status Not moved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e112"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sponsored the unmoved amendment",
            "sourceName": "Lord Hunt of Kings Heath",
            "targetName": "Lords Amendment 84",
            "date": "2026-07; checked 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sobel",
      "label": "Alex Sobel",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "MP, historical Fabian executive; ControlAI-backed legislative activity.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/sobel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "sobel",
        "name": "Alex Sobel",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "MP, historical Fabian executive; ControlAI-backed legislative activity.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "MP, historical Fabian executive; ControlAI-backed legislative activity."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
            "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Alex Sobel is a UK MP who appears as a ControlAI campaign supporter and a participant in proposed AI legislation. The research also records historical Fabian executive service in 2011–2012. These are separate political, campaigning and organisational relationships.",
        "structuralRole": "A route from campaign advocacy to proposed legislation",
        "significance": "Sobel’s significance is the ability to carry an issue into a parliamentary procedure. That is more concrete than general agreement with a campaign, but a sponsor’s action and the legislature’s adoption remain separate events. His older Fabian role supplies historical context rather than a current chain of command.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the parliamentary record supports",
            "text": "He sponsored Commons NC12 in June 2026, which was marked “Not called.” A September 2026 schedule listed a ten-minute-rule motion to seek leave for an artificial-superintelligence bill. The retained schedule did not establish the final introduced text or passage. ControlAI’s supporter listing identifies a public alignment without specifying every proposal he endorsed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
                "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e109",
              "e111",
              "e130",
              "e137"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e137"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official schedule is for a ten-minute-rule motion. At original Sep 5 cutoff not introduced/passed; exact introduced bill text not verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e109"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
                "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Parliament",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was scheduled to seek leave for an ASI bill in",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "UK Parliament",
            "date": "2026-09-08 scheduled"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original 2012 annual-report roster. Later publication relationship does not prove uninterrupted executive membership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e130"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive member, 2011–2012",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2011–2012"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official status Not called; not enacted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e111"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commons NC12",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sponsored the uncalled Commons proposal",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "Commons NC12",
            "date": "2026-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "What would change this assessment",
            "text": "Targeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.",
            "matched": [
              "Sobel"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "98ce2205f3b3a945417e049a053a3ad02c3fbdfd6ce1aad92d21b892ab789337"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Targeted UK follow-up recovered official schedule pages for Sobel's September8 motion, not its outcome. The Hansard and bills open routes failed; a separate official schedule search did not supply the missing outcome. Preserve scheduled stage. Do not rerun identical failed routes or call introduction established.",
            "matched": [
              "Sobel"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "09cb5fc8decdd59fd6f6ddc59788d6b6c891a189bce66fa6e67bdbe8928c8e25"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
            "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "dodds",
      "label": "Anneliese Dodds",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Fabian co-chair listed in observed current executive roster; ControlAI-listed campaign supporter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/dodds",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "dodds",
        "name": "Anneliese Dodds",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Fabian co-chair listed in observed current executive roster; ControlAI-listed campaign supporter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fabian co-chair listed in observed current executive roster; ControlAI-listed campaign supporter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anneliese Dodds appears in the September 2026 research as a co-chair on the Fabian Society’s published roster and as a supporter listed by ControlAI. The first record concerns an organisational leadership role; the second concerns support for an AI-policy campaign.",
        "structuralRole": "An overlapping political leadership and advocacy connection",
        "significance": "Her significance in this map is the overlap between an established political organisation and a campaign seeking restrictions on advanced AI. That overlap identifies a person through whom ideas or introductions might travel. It does not by itself show that the Fabian Society funded or directed the campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two public records, different meanings",
            "text": "The Fabian roster was read on 5 September 2026; its older URL did not supply an appointment date. ControlAI’s separate statement lists Dodds as a supporter. Neither source establishes her endorsement of every later tactic, a payment arrangement, or a formal instruction issued on the society’s behalf.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e126",
              "e133"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e133"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Anneliese Dodds",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e126"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Anneliese Dodds",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "russell",
      "label": "Sarah Russell",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Fabian executive member; ControlAI-listed campaign supporter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/russell",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "russell",
        "name": "Sarah Russell",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Fabian executive member; ControlAI-listed campaign supporter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fabian executive member; ControlAI-listed campaign supporter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sarah Russell is listed on the Fabian Society’s executive roster and separately appears as a ControlAI campaign supporter in the September 2026 research. Her two recorded roles connect a political organisation and a public AI-advocacy effort.",
        "structuralRole": "An individual overlap between political organisation and campaign",
        "significance": "The useful inquiry is what participation followed that public alignment: introductions, statements, drafting, funding or some other concrete activity. The current records establish the overlap itself, while leaving the operational extent of the campaign relationship unspecified.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reading the two listings",
            "text": "The Fabian roster was observed on 5 September 2026; an old URL slug is not an appointment date. ControlAI’s supporter statement identifies a person aligned with the campaign but contains no payment terms or mandate to act for the Fabian Society.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e127",
              "e134"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e134"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Sarah Russell",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e127"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive member",
            "sourceName": "Sarah Russell",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "hedges",
      "label": "Mike Hedges",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Welsh Fabians executive representative; ControlAI-listed supporter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/hedges",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "hedges",
        "name": "Mike Hedges",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Welsh Fabians executive representative; ControlAI-listed supporter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Welsh Fabians executive representative; ControlAI-listed supporter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mike Hedges appears on the Fabian Society’s published executive roster as its Welsh Fabians representative and on ControlAI’s list of campaign supporters. The records establish an organisational role and a separate public alignment with an AI-policy campaign.",
        "structuralRole": "A connection into Welsh political organising",
        "significance": "Hedges is relevant as a named bridge between a territorial political network and a wider campaign. The recorded roles can help trace who introduces or advocates an issue across political settings. They do not identify a grant, commissioning decision or society-wide instruction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What is dated and what is not",
            "text": "Both public listings were observed on 5 September 2026. The roster’s older page address did not establish an appointment date. ControlAI’s supporter statement gives no compensation terms and does not establish endorsement of every later proposal or tactic.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e128",
              "e135"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e135"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Mike Hedges",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e128"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Welsh Fabians executive representative",
            "sourceName": "Mike Hedges",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "asato",
      "label": "Jess Asato",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Fabian chair 2012-2014; ControlAI-listed supporter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/asato",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "asato",
        "name": "Jess Asato",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Fabian chair 2012-2014; ControlAI-listed supporter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fabian chair 2012-2014; ControlAI-listed supporter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society history",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Jess Asato was chair of the Fabian Society from 2012 to 2014 and appears on ControlAI’s later list of campaign supporters. The research links a historical leadership role with a separate, more recent public advocacy alignment.",
        "structuralRole": "Political experience connected to campaign endorsement",
        "significance": "The relationship is useful for understanding the social and political reach of the campaign. A former chair’s later support may place the issue before familiar audiences, but a historical title does not establish present control of the society or a decision taken in its name.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The dates prevent a false hierarchy",
            "text": "Asato’s chairmanship belongs to 2012–2014. The ControlAI listing was observed in September 2026 and supplies no financial terms or detailed account of her participation. These records identify an individual overlap rather than a continuing office, formal partnership, or institutional funding channel.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society history",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e129",
              "e136"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e136"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Jess Asato",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical leadership; no current executive authority inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e129"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society history",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chair, 2012–2014",
            "sourceName": "Jess Asato",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2012–2014"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society history",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "knight",
      "label": "Jim Knight",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Fabian rural-Labour research adviser in 2017; ControlAI-listed supporter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/knight",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "knight",
        "name": "Jim Knight",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Fabian rural-Labour research adviser in 2017; ControlAI-listed supporter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fabian rural-Labour research adviser in 2017; ControlAI-listed supporter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Jim Knight served on a Fabian rural-Labour research advisory panel in 2017 and is separately listed as a ControlAI supporter. The research-panel record describes a limited advisory project, not a general executive role in the society.",
        "structuralRole": "Research-policy participation and later campaign support",
        "significance": "Knight illustrates how an established policy network can overlap with a later advocacy campaign through individuals. The specific function here is advisory participation and public support; neither establishes authority to direct the organisations connected through his name.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the earlier role involved",
            "text": "The rural-Labour panel met twice in 2017 and its report appeared in March 2018. ControlAI’s later public statement supplies the second connection. Keeping that project-specific appointment distinct from the later supporter listing prevents a temporary research role from becoming an invented continuous chain of governance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e131",
              "e138"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e138"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Jim Knight",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Rural-Labour research panel met twice in 2017; report published March 2018.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e131"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research advisory panel, 2017",
            "sourceName": "Jim Knight",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2017"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lister",
      "label": "Baroness Lister",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Fabian June 2025 event speaker; ControlAI-listed supporter. Vice-presidency not verified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/lister",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "lister",
        "name": "Baroness Lister",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Fabian June 2025 event speaker; ControlAI-listed supporter. Vice-presidency not verified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fabian June 2025 event speaker; ControlAI-listed supporter. Vice-presidency not verified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Baroness Lister is recorded here as a speaker at the Fabian Society’s June 2025 summit and as a supporter listed by ControlAI. The evidence supports those particular forms of participation; a suggested Fabian vice-presidency was not verified.",
        "structuralRole": "A public-advocacy overlap through political events",
        "significance": "A named speaker and campaign supporter can connect an advocacy effort to political audiences without holding operational authority over either organisation. This profile is useful for following public endorsement and convening, while keeping those functions distinct from governance or financing.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The scope of the connection",
            "text": "The Fabian event took place on 10 June 2025. The ControlAI supporter listing was observed in September 2026. These establish participation at different times and in different settings. The retained record does not supply a current executive appointment, a campaign contract, or endorsement of every subsequent ControlAI proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e132",
              "e139"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e139"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "Baroness Lister",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Event participation only; vice-presidency unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e132"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fabian Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named summit speaker",
            "sourceName": "Baroness Lister",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2025-06-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "fabians",
      "label": "Fabian Society",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named current/former leadership overlaps. No Society-to-ControlAI funding, commissioning or direction established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/fabians",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "fabians",
        "name": "Fabian Society",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named current/former leadership overlaps. No Society-to-ControlAI funding, commissioning or direction established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named current/former leadership overlaps. No Society-to-ControlAI funding, commissioning or direction established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society history",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Fabian Society is a British political and policy organisation. It enters this investigation through named politicians whose Fabian roles overlap with participation in ControlAI’s public campaign. Those roles range from current executive positions to events and appointments more than a decade earlier.",
        "structuralRole": "Political networks and overlapping public advocates",
        "significance": "The useful connection is access to an established political milieu: some people active in or around the society also lend support to an AI-policy campaign. The individual links explain possible routes for introductions and persuasion. They do not establish a Fabian funding programme or instruction to ControlAI.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Which overlaps are actually recorded",
            "text": "The September 2026 roster names Anneliese Dodds, Sarah Russell and Mike Hedges. Jess Asato’s chairmanship belongs to 2012–2014, Alex Sobel’s executive service to 2011–2012, and Jim Knight’s research-panel participation to 2017. Baroness Lister appears as a June 2025 summit speaker. These different kinds of participation should not be collapsed into one present-day leadership group.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society history",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e126",
              "e127",
              "e128",
              "e129",
              "e130",
              "e131",
              "e132"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original 2012 annual-report roster. Later publication relationship does not prove uninterrupted executive membership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e130"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alex Sobel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive member, 2011–2012",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2011–2012"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e126"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anneliese Dodds",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Anneliese Dodds",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Rural-Labour research panel met twice in 2017; report published March 2018.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e131"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jim Knight",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research advisory panel, 2017",
            "sourceName": "Jim Knight",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2017"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical leadership; no current executive authority inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e129"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Society history",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jess Asato",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chair, 2012–2014",
            "sourceName": "Jess Asato",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2012–2014"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Event participation only; vice-presidency unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e132"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
                "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Baroness Lister",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named summit speaker",
            "sourceName": "Baroness Lister",
            "targetName": "Fabian Society",
            "date": "2025-06-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society history",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "nti",
      "label": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Browne vice-chair in historical event report; co-hosted 2017 WEF roundtable.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/nti",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "nti",
        "name": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Browne vice-chair in historical event report; co-hosted 2017 WEF roundtable.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Browne vice-chair in historical event report; co-hosted 2017 WEF roundtable."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Nuclear Threat Initiative is a security-policy organisation appearing here through Des Browne’s historical vice-chair role and a biological-risk roundtable co-hosted with the World Economic Forum in 2017. These are security-network connections with their own dates and scope.",
        "structuralRole": "A historical security-policy network around an adviser",
        "significance": "NTI supplies context for Browne’s professional milieu beyond the AI campaign. The relevant route is convening and policy discussion on major security risks. That background can explain overlapping contacts without establishing an NTI role in financing or directing ControlAI.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded event",
            "text": "The NTI–WEF biological-risk roundtable was held in New York on 20 September 2017. The event account names Browne’s vice-chair role but does not establish that he personally attended or organised that roundtable. The retained evidence does not convert this older event into a later ControlAI partnership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e142",
              "e143"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report names institutional role but does not establish Browne attended or organized the cited WEF roundtable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e142"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Des Browne",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Vice-chair in 2017 event report",
            "sourceName": "Des Browne",
            "targetName": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
            "date": "2017"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "New York event September 20, 2017. No ControlAI connection or funding inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e143"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
                "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Economic Forum",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-hosted biological-risk roundtable",
            "sourceName": "Nuclear Threat Initiative",
            "targetName": "World Economic Forum",
            "date": "2017-09-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cfg",
      "label": "Centre for Future Generations",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Behrens former employer. Donor disclosures do not establish transfers to ControlAI.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cfg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cfg",
        "name": "Centre for Future Generations",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Behrens former employer. Donor disclosures do not establish transfers to ControlAI.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Behrens former employer. Donor disclosures do not establish transfers to ControlAI."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Centre for Future Generations is a policy organisation that previously employed Eva Behrens as a policy researcher. Its own donor disclosures name seed and general supporters. The research places her employment there through January 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "A professional and funding-network connection in Behrens’s history",
        "significance": "CFG helps explain the institutional experience and contacts that preceded Behrens’s ControlAI work. It also has its own disclosed support arrangements. Following the employer and its funders separately avoids turning a professional move into an assumed transfer of donor money to another organisation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the disclosures establish",
            "text": "Behrens’s professional history supplies the employment connection. CFG names Dreamery and Tanka as providing seed support for a five-year baseline, and Powoki as a general supporter. The retained disclosures do not state an amount or trace any of that support onward to ControlAI.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e120",
              "e121"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Professional history dates CFG work end January 2025; no current employment inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e120"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
                "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former policy researcher",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Centre for Future Generations",
            "date": "Through 2025-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Dreamery and Tanka seed funding cover first five years baseline; Powoki also named general supporter. No amount or onward ControlAI transfer established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e121"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dreamery / Tanka / Powoki",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Seed / general support disclosed",
            "sourceName": "Dreamery / Tanka / Powoki",
            "targetName": "Centre for Future Generations",
            "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cfgfunders",
      "label": "Dreamery / Tanka / Powoki",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "CFG named supporters. Dreamery associated with cofounder Steven Schuurman; seed funding covers first five years baseline.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cfgfunders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cfgfunders",
        "name": "Dreamery / Tanka / Powoki",
        "role": "Funder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CFG named supporters. Dreamery associated with cofounder Steven Schuurman; seed funding covers first five years baseline.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CFG named supporters. Dreamery associated with cofounder Steven Schuurman; seed funding covers first five years baseline."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CFG named supporters. Dreamery associated with cofounder Steven Schuurman; seed funding covers first five years baseline.",
        "structuralRole": "Funder",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Dreamery and Tanka seed funding cover first five years baseline; Powoki also named general supporter. No amount or onward ControlAI transfer established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e121"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Future Generations",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Seed / general support disclosed",
            "sourceName": "Dreamery / Tanka / Powoki",
            "targetName": "Centre for Future Generations",
            "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "CFG's disclosed seed backing from Dreamery and Tanka, plus subsequent general/program funding, describes her former employer's support. It is not a demonstrated funding path to ControlAI. Oxford/IAI publications show access to established policy research channels, not employment or official government authority at those publishers.",
            "matched": [
              "Dreamery"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c9aa5438bb89cd0a65895d30ce79cbcfb54cb5b6e73c7ec5e4900df56738f373"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cdi",
      "label": "Center for Data Innovation / ITIF",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "2022 Behrens policy fellowship; CDI part of ITIF.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cdi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cdi",
        "name": "Center for Data Innovation / ITIF",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "2022 Behrens policy fellowship; CDI part of ITIF.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2022 Behrens policy fellowship; CDI part of ITIF."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDI institutional identity",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2022 Behrens policy fellowship; CDI part of ITIF.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "ITIF opposes the Sanders–Casar ban",
            "text": "ITIF’s September 3 statement, attributed to Daniel Castro, argues the ban would sacrifice innovation and American competitiveness. The statement belongs to ITIF; this combined CDI/ITIF record does not attribute it to former fellow Eva Behrens.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
                "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ITIF published Daniel Castro's criticism of the proposed ban, urging continued AI development alongside safety work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-05"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
                "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ITIF publicly opposes",
            "sourceName": "Center for Data Innovation / ITIF",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "October 2022 employer biography; CDI is part of ITIF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e122"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDI institutional identity",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Policy fellow",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Center for Data Innovation / ITIF",
            "date": "2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Most consequential findings",
            "text": "A September 2022 policy panel hosted by the Center for Data Innovation places him beside FLI's Anthony Aguirre, DeepMind's Alexandra Belias, Hugging Face's Irene Solaiman, and Kai Zenner, then head of office and digital policy adviser to MEP Axel Voss. It is a concrete earlier point of contact with the FLI and European policy worlds. It establishes coappearance, not an alliance or payment. [M01]",
            "matched": [
              "Center for Data Innovation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e38607b332202c3138fc6edc30e28b14a291c8391448c1a1bd1399c8f81fd40b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "Her corroborated trajectory runs from European industrial/economic and innovation-policy work into AI policy research, then Conjecture operations and ControlAI. An October 2022 employer biography identifies her as a Center for Data Innovation policy fellow, with prior OECD fiscal foresight and Federation of German Industries industrial/Sino-European policy experience, and an MPA from UCL. May and November 2024 publications independently document her CFG and Oxford Martin collaborative work. Her own site dates the end of her CFG work to January 2025. Conjecture's May 2025 privacy notice names her as organizational contact. The current ControlAI team lists Special Projects Lead.",
            "matched": [
              "Center for Data Innovation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "967ca7d8c5cc56e298c26f592191304c724067f8aef8bf206d69167977acad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDI institutional identity",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
            "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "oecd",
      "label": "OECD",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Behrens prior fiscal-foresight work reported in employer biography.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/oecd",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "oecd",
        "name": "OECD",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Behrens prior fiscal-foresight work reported in employer biography.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Behrens prior fiscal-foresight work reported in employer biography."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The OECD is an intergovernmental policy organisation. In this investigation it appears in two separate contexts: Eva Behrens’s earlier fiscal-foresight work and an event-partner credit for the December 2025 Athens Roundtable on AI governance.",
        "structuralRole": "Public-policy expertise and institutional convening",
        "significance": "The OECD connection helps show how policy professionals and governance events can share an institutional setting. Prior work and an event credit are different relationships; neither on its own establishes OECD endorsement of an individual’s later campaign or every proposal discussed at an event.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two dated paths into the map",
            "text": "A 2022 employer biography reports Behrens’s earlier fiscal-foresight work, without precise dates or compensation. The Athens Roundtable recap separately credits the OECD as a partner for the 4 December 2025 London event. The latter is a convening relationship rather than a recorded commitment to an AI treaty.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e123",
              "w8-red-e-athens-oecd"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 employer biography; exact dates/pay not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e123"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Prior fiscal-foresight work",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "OECD",
            "date": "Before October 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited as event partner",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-oecd"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited as event partner",
            "sourceName": "OECD",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025; recap p2"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway",
            "heading": "S4 — Documented route into summit programming",
            "text": "Page 1 names TFS as organizer with OECD and UNESCO and calls the event an official pre-summit event of the 2026 AI Impact Summit. Pages 4–6 explicitly build Dialogue 1 on the Global Call and a pre-event survey; participants would be grouped using survey responses and backgrounds, then produce a roadmap for later diplomatic forums. This is a designed agenda pathway, not just shared attendance.",
            "matched": [
              "OECD"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2d2e9c2c95b1fd48aa4a425c8bca4d867314701eb8c531b34b9c8d295ab4b7da"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "Causal checks and stopping boundary",
            "text": "The September2025 campaign cannot have caused the February2025 Paris summit, June2025 UNESCO umbrella-network launch, or earlier Seoul2024 commitments. Its organizers can have contributed to earlier processes in other capacities; that requires its own dated evidence. Hosting on OECD/UNESCO sites is not by itself institutional endorsement. Attendance and parliamentary speech are useful mechanisms of access, but do not establish agreed policy, government sponsorship, donor instruction, or exclusive access.",
            "matched": [
              "OECD"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5a27928bed7604e66d89a41823c1c7d06c971f1b9f3604cc6b91d8d61375feaa"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes",
            "heading": "Rival explanations and the decisive remaining record",
            "text": "The official documents support an independent institutional pathway: earlier Hiroshima/GPAI/OECD work, France's already published agenda, and leaders' stated security/adoption concerns. CeSIA may have reinforced that agenda, sought access after it was established, contributed through an uncredited channel, or failed to secure its specific threshold/slowdown ask. Current evidence discriminates against treating the June outcome as fulfillment of that ask; it does not choose among all these influence alternatives.",
            "matched": [
              "OECD"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "55b8ed697210f8b6681c68688a4e618743e35e711d13d18371d94fd5806b9c94"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "Her corroborated trajectory runs from European industrial/economic and innovation-policy work into AI policy research, then Conjecture operations and ControlAI. An October 2022 employer biography identifies her as a Center for Data Innovation policy fellow, with prior OECD fiscal foresight and Federation of German Industries industrial/Sino-European policy experience, and an MPA from UCL. May and November 2024 publications independently document her CFG and Oxford Martin collaborative work. Her own site dates the end of her CFG work to January 2025. Conjecture's May 2025 privacy notice names her as organizational contact. The current ControlAI team lists Special Projects Lead.",
            "matched": [
              "OECD"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "967ca7d8c5cc56e298c26f592191304c724067f8aef8bf206d69167977acad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "bdi",
      "label": "Federation of German Industries",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Behrens prior industrial-policy and Sino-European-relations work.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/bdi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "bdi",
        "name": "Federation of German Industries",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Behrens prior industrial-policy and Sino-European-relations work.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Behrens prior industrial-policy and Sino-European-relations work."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Behrens prior industrial-policy and Sino-European-relations work.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2022 biography references industrial policy and Sino-European relations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e124"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Prior industrial-policy work",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Federation of German Industries",
            "date": "Before October 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
            "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
            "heading": "Findings",
            "text": "Her corroborated trajectory runs from European industrial/economic and innovation-policy work into AI policy research, then Conjecture operations and ControlAI. An October 2022 employer biography identifies her as a Center for Data Innovation policy fellow, with prior OECD fiscal foresight and Federation of German Industries industrial/Sino-European policy experience, and an MPA from UCL. May and November 2024 publications independently document her CFG and Oxford Martin collaborative work. Her own site dates the end of her CFG work to January 2025. Conjecture's May 2025 privacy notice names her as organizational contact. The current ControlAI team lists Special Projects Lead.",
            "matched": [
              "Federation of German Industries"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "967ca7d8c5cc56e298c26f592191304c724067f8aef8bf206d69167977acad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "eidproposal",
      "label": "Persistent electronic-ID identifiers",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Behrens 2022 authored EU eID design position; no demonstrated age-verification campaign involvement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/eidproposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "eidproposal",
        "name": "Persistent electronic-ID identifiers",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Behrens 2022 authored EU eID design position; no demonstrated age-verification campaign involvement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Behrens 2022 authored EU eID design position; no demonstrated age-verification campaign involvement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Behrens 2022 authored EU eID design position; no demonstrated age-verification campaign involvement.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Argues for unique persistent identifiers in European electronic IDs on reliability/privacy grounds. Does not establish universal online identity or involvement in age-verification campaigns.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e125"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
                "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eva Behrens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Authored eID design position",
            "sourceName": "Eva Behrens",
            "targetName": "Persistent electronic-ID identifiers",
            "date": "2022-10-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "middlepowers",
      "label": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "November 2025 coauthored policy paper; state export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not enacted authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/middlepowers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "middlepowers",
        "name": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "November 2025 coauthored policy paper; state export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not enacted authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "November 2025 coauthored policy paper; state export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not enacted authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The middle-powers ASI proposal is a November 2025 policy paper by Andrea Miotti, Eva Behrens, Gabriel Alfour and Alex Amadori. It argues for action by a coalition of states using export controls, sanctions and specified red lines concerning artificial superintelligence.",
        "structuralRole": "A proposed international enforcement architecture",
        "significance": "This paper matters because it moves from public warnings into a proposed allocation of state power. It describes which actors might coordinate and which instruments they might use. It is a policy design to scrutinise, not evidence that those states have committed to it or begun enforcing it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How to read the coercive provisions",
            "text": "The recorded proposal combines economic restrictions with specified self-defence red lines. Those mechanisms need to be read according to their conditions, rather than paraphrased as an automatic obligation to wage war. The authorship links establish a shared drafting project among people associated with Conjecture and ControlAI; they do not establish government commissioning.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
                "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e113",
              "e114",
              "e115"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e113"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
                "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Andrea Miotti",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "Middle-powers ASI proposal",
            "date": "2025-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "asiuk",
      "label": "ControlAI proposed UK ASI bill",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "22-page download read September 2026. Proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction powers, oversight. Not enacted.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/asiuk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "asiuk",
        "name": "ControlAI proposed UK ASI bill",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "22-page download read September 2026. Proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction powers, oversight. Not enacted.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "22-page download read September 2026. Proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction powers, oversight. Not enacted."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
            "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "22-page download read September 2026. Proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction powers, oversight. Not enacted.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "22-page download defines ASI through specified UK security harm and proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction and expert oversight. Separate from emergency-shutdown amendment; not enacted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e108"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
                "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published proposed ASI prohibition text",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI proposed UK ASI bill",
            "date": "Draft captured 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
            "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "nc12",
      "label": "Commons NC12",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not called.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/nc12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "nc12",
        "name": "Commons NC12",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not called.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not called."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official status at Sep 5 cutoff: Not called.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official NC12 status: Not called. Parliamentary attribution establishes advocacy, not adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e110"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "backed the uncalled shutdown proposal",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Commons NC12",
            "date": "2026-06; status checked 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official status Not called; not enacted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e111"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alex Sobel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sponsored the uncalled Commons proposal",
            "sourceName": "Alex Sobel",
            "targetName": "Commons NC12",
            "date": "2026-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ltf",
      "label": "Leading the Future",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "FEC C00916114; $75,788,224.10 receipts through June 30, 2026.",
      "aliases": [
        "Leading the Future"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ltf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ltf",
        "name": "Leading the Future",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FEC C00916114; $75,788,224.10 receipts through June 30, 2026.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FEC C00916114; $75,788,224.10 receipts through June 30, 2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Leading the Future"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Leading the Future is a US federal political committee registered with the Federal Election Commission as C00916114. Its filings show substantial receipts and transfers to other committees, including Think Big. Those records make it a funding hub in the campaign's examination of electoral activity around AI policy.",
        "structuralRole": "Political-finance hub moving donor money into other committees",
        "significance": "The committee connects large individual and institutional contributions to downstream electoral spending capacity. Its transfer to Think Big can be followed to that committee's named vendor and candidate-opposition filings. That route shows purchased political activity without identifying an original donor's instructions for a particular advertisement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Receipts, transfers and the accounting boundary",
            "text": "The FEC summary reports $75,788,224.10 in receipts through 30 June 2026. Retained filings include separate $12.5 million individual contributions from Greg and Anna Brockman on 12 September 2025, and two other filed contributions totalling $50 million. LTF's 24 February 2026 $5 million transfer to Think Big is part of its reported $40 million committee-transfer aggregate, not additional outside money. Reported affiliation with Build American AI does not trace those filed donations into a particular creator payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e144",
              "e145",
              "e146",
              "e147",
              "e149",
              "w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LTF Schedule B line23 p13 reports $5m to Think Big, transaction SB23.I31388. This is part of e147 $40m aggregate, not additional outside money or a Build American AI transfer. No earmark to a specific ad or ultimate donor established. Financial details: value: 5,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported committee contribution, subset of e147; period: 2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Think Big",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported committee contribution",
            "sourceName": "Leading the Future",
            "targetName": "Think Big",
            "date": "2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$25m August 22, 2025 and $25m February 11, 2026. Partnership/member attributions are not extra contributions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e144"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$50m across two filed contributions",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Leading the Future",
            "date": "2025-08-22; 2026-02-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Reported through June 30, 2026; not a demonstrated Build American AI allocation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e147"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Other political committees",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$40m committee-transfer aggregate",
            "sourceName": "Leading the Future",
            "targetName": "Other political committees",
            "date": "Through 2026-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Filed September 12, 2025. Not an OpenAI corporate transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e145"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Brockman",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
            "sourceName": "Greg Brockman",
            "targetName": "Leading the Future",
            "date": "2025-09-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Filed September 12, 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e146"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anna Brockman",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
            "sourceName": "Anna Brockman",
            "targetName": "Leading the Future",
            "date": "2025-09-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Secondary reporting; no transfer of named FEC donations traced to Build American AI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e149"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Build American AI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported affiliation",
            "sourceName": "Leading the Future",
            "targetName": "Build American AI",
            "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Political money needs the correct donor",
            "text": "The separately reviewed Leading the Future filings record two $25 million a16z contributions, received on 22 August 2025 and 11 February 2026. Greg and Anna Brockman's separate individual contributions are not OpenAI corporate money. A $5 million transfer to Think Big on 24 February 2026 is downstream committee money, not another outside donor contribution. Those distinctions prevent an apparent network total from counting the same money again at each stop. January filing , Q1 filing .",
            "matched": [
              "Leading the Future"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "009c2a54a0f9f367655814957afcb4ebbaf2d807cf0fd4f01b8b40b274d057b1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Ready for independent review. This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, an original donor's instruction, or the effect of the spending. Public records retrieved September 8, 2026. No messages, paid acquisition or publication.",
            "matched": [
              "Leading the Future"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8a326a9fd10c81c22c5c5fa26bfbe00a74a0df83983da9c7e648f50028dc5eab"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "a16z",
      "label": "a16z Capital Management",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Two filed $25m contributions to LTF.",
      "aliases": [
        "a16z"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/a16z",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "a16z",
        "name": "a16z Capital Management",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Two filed $25m contributions to LTF.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Two filed $25m contributions to LTF."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "a16z"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "a16z supplies investment capital and organized policy capacity to AI, crypto and defense-related markets. Its firm political contributions must remain separate from Marc Andreessen's personal gifts and from ownership memo attributions.",
        "structuralRole": "Venture investor and policy institution",
        "significance": "The firm works on both the supply of technology and the rules governing development, compute access and procurement. These overlapping interests do not establish a single chain of command across recipients.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Fund resources and deployment",
            "text": "On 9 January 2026 the manager announced more than $15bn raised, including $1.176bn American Dynamism, $1.7bn Infrastructure and $6.75bn Growth. A separate 28 August announcement reported $1.1bn for the Machine Age Fund. These are fundraising figures. Their cross-announcement overlap and completed deployment are not reconciled here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z fundraise, 2026-01-09",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-machine"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Models, infrastructure and defense",
            "text": "OpenAI names a16z as co-lead of its 31 March 2026 financing; $122bn is the entire round's committed capital, not the firm's check. A16z co-led Volta's Series A to address compute financing and participated alongside Founders Fund in Anduril's 2021 Series D. Investor-specific contractual rights are undisclosed in these announcements.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-openai",
              "w37-marc-e-volta",
              "w37-marc-e-anduril"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Firm political money",
            "text": "The May 2024 Fairshake update reports $47m firm support across Fairshake and associated PACs. Its August correction excludes founders' ownership memo items from additional personal giving and disclaims control of spending. The 4 November 2024 announcement adds more than $23m for the 2026 cycle. These dated disclosures are not a fresh cumulative receipts audit.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
              },
              {
                "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake47",
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake26"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A submitted policy program",
            "text": "Its 14 March 2025 OSTP submission uses the legal name AH Capital Management LLC under the a16z brand. It seeks federal preemption of state model-development restrictions, continued state enforcement against harmful use, and compute and talent investment. Submission is documented; adoption and causal influence are not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
                "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-ostp"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Procurement and alliances",
            "text": "The Defense Reform campaign names NDAA acquisition and workforce changes relevant to venture-backed defense suppliers. The exact bill-year and final provisions were not audited. Its joint Microsoft policy statement shows cooperation across firm sizes, even where the firm invokes competition with incumbents.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-defense",
              "w37-marc-e-msft-policy"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Venture capital firm founded by Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz; its Open Source AI Grant program named Pliny as a recipient.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Andreessen Horowitz",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/about/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "An identified startup-policy network partner",
            "text": "AIN’s original launch names a16z as a partner. This establishes a declared advocacy relationship, not a contribution amount or control of the newly reported House caucus. The historical partnership was newly inspected September 14.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
                "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-ain-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-caucus-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Formal AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission seeks federal preemption of state model-development restrictions and compute/talent investment, preserving state harm enforcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-ostp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
                "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submits AI Action Plan recommendations",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The June26,2025 cohort announcement names Pliny. The program describes grants rather than investments; recipient-specific value is undisclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces Open Source AI Grant",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-06-26; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current campaign names House/Senate NDAA provisions for commercial acquisition, workforce and autonomous-system/munitions procurement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-defense"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NDAA procurement reform advocacy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "runs public procurement-reform campaign",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "NDAA procurement reform advocacy",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Andreessen/Horowitz and Nadella/Smith jointly publish AI for Startups, proposing collaboration across Little and Big Tech.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-msft-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors joint AI policy statement",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Microsoft",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "a16z announces co-leading Volta Series A; thesis is cloud operations plus project finance to extend compute access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-volta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Volta",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-leads Series A",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Volta",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$25m August 22, 2025 and $25m February 11, 2026. Partnership/member attributions are not extra contributions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e144"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leading the Future",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$50m across two filed contributions",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Leading the Future",
            "date": "2025-08-22; 2026-02-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Dixon announces more than $23m additional funds for Fairshake and affiliated PACs for 2026 cycle.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "additional firm election-cycle support announced",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Marc Andreessen announced an Andreessen Horowitz investment in Anduril in October 2019.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-a16z"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anduril Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Historical firm investment",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta governance roster",
            "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
            "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
          },
          {
            "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
            "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
            "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
          },
          {
            "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/"
          },
          {
            "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
            "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
          },
          {
            "title": "a16z fundraise, 2026-01-09",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Andreessen Horowitz",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Andreessen Horowitz, known as a16z, finances technology companies and organizes political support for the markets they need. Its AI, crypto and defense interests connect startup investment to campaigns over regulation, infrastructure and government purchasing.",
          "structuralRole": "Investment capital joined to policy and electoral spending",
          "significance": "The firm can fund the technology, sustain arguments for its adoption and back political efforts to change the rules around it. That combination makes it a major institution in the pro-deployment side of this network.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "a16z is a venture-capital manager operating under the legal name AH Capital Management LLC. Its investments span AI models, compute financing, crypto and defense technology. In January 2026 it announced more than $15 billion raised across funds, including infrastructure, growth and American Dynamism. Its scale allows it to support both companies and the wider conditions in which those companies do business.",
            "OpenAI identified a16z as a co-lead of its March 2026 financing. The firm also backed compute-financing company Volta and participated with Founders Fund in an Anduril funding round. These investments connect software capability to the capital, physical infrastructure and customers needed to deploy it.",
            "The firm’s policy requests are specific. Its March 2025 submission to the White House sought federal preemption of state restrictions on model development, continued enforcement against harmful uses, and investment in compute and talent. Its defense-reform campaign promotes acquisition and workforce changes relevant to venture-backed suppliers. Its crypto arm has also announced substantial support for Fairshake and associated political committees. Two FEC-recorded contributions to Leading the Future total $50 million across August 2025 and February 2026.",
            "a16z presents this activity as a defense of technological progress and startup competition. Its commercial interest is equally clear: investment returns depend partly on whether companies can build, scale and sell. Partnerships can cross the lines drawn in public rhetoric—Andreessen and Horowitz coauthored an AI-for-startups policy statement with Microsoft’s leaders.",
            "AIN’s original launch names a16z as a partner. This establishes a declared advocacy relationship, not a contribution amount or control of the newly reported House caucus. The historical partnership was newly inspected September 14."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "a16z fundraise, 2026-01-09",
              "url": "https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/"
            },
            {
              "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
              "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/"
            },
            {
              "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
              "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
              "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
            },
            {
              "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
              "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Leading the Future: 2025 year-end FEC filing",
              "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Leading the Future: 2026 first-quarter FEC filing",
              "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
              "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
              "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "gregbrockman",
      "label": "Greg Brockman",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "$12.5m individual contribution; not an OpenAI corporate payment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/gregbrockman",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "gregbrockman",
        "name": "Greg Brockman",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "$12.5m individual contribution; not an OpenAI corporate payment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "$12.5m individual contribution; not an OpenAI corporate payment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Greg Brockman is an individual donor recorded as contributing $12.5 million to Leading the Future on 12 September 2025. This profile follows the personal political-finance relationship documented in the committee's FEC filing, rather than treating it as a payment by OpenAI.",
        "structuralRole": "Named individual source of major committee funding",
        "significance": "The filing provides a direct route from a named person to a committee's resources. It does not by itself establish that an employer commissioned the contribution, selected later targets or directed a particular downstream vendor. Corporate affiliation and the legal identity of the contributor are different facts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the filed entry supports",
            "text": "The retained January 2026 filing records the $12.5 million personal contribution. Anna Brockman's same-date $12.5 million contribution is a separate entry. The subsequent committee-transfer and vendor records can be followed as downstream transactions, but no acquired earmark connects Greg Brockman's particular dollars or instructions to an individual advertisement or creator fee.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e145"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Filed September 12, 2025. Not an OpenAI corporate transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e145"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leading the Future",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
            "sourceName": "Greg Brockman",
            "targetName": "Leading the Future",
            "date": "2025-09-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "annabrockman",
      "label": "Anna Brockman",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "$12.5m individual contribution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/annabrockman",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "annabrockman",
        "name": "Anna Brockman",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "$12.5m individual contribution.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "$12.5m individual contribution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anna Brockman is an individual donor recorded in Leading the Future's federal campaign-finance filing. The retained entry identifies a $12.5 million contribution dated 12 September 2025, providing a direct personal funding relationship with the committee.",
        "structuralRole": "Named individual source of major committee funding",
        "significance": "The contribution is a substantial input to the committee's political resources. It establishes donor-to-committee finance, but does not earmark a particular advertisement, transfer or creator payment, and does not identify a corporate donor merely through personal association.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A distinct individual contribution",
            "text": "The January 2026 FEC filing records Anna Brockman's $12.5 million contribution separately from Greg Brockman's contribution on the same date. Each is its own individual entry. The retained profile evidence supplies no separate professional history, donor instruction or agreement assigning control over subsequent committee spending.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e146"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Filed September 12, 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e146"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leading the Future",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
            "sourceName": "Anna Brockman",
            "targetName": "Leading the Future",
            "date": "2025-09-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Political money needs the correct donor",
            "text": "The separately reviewed Leading the Future filings record two $25 million a16z contributions, received on 22 August 2025 and 11 February 2026. Greg and Anna Brockman's separate individual contributions are not OpenAI corporate money. A $5 million transfer to Think Big on 24 February 2026 is downstream committee money, not another outside donor contribution. Those distinctions prevent an apparent network total from counting the same money again at each stop. January filing , Q1 filing .",
            "matched": [
              "Anna Brockman"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "009c2a54a0f9f367655814957afcb4ebbaf2d807cf0fd4f01b8b40b274d057b1"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "othercommittees",
      "label": "Other political committees",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "LTF transfer aggregate only; recipient-by-recipient allocation not mapped.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/othercommittees",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "othercommittees",
        "name": "Other political committees",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "LTF transfer aggregate only; recipient-by-recipient allocation not mapped.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "LTF transfer aggregate only; recipient-by-recipient allocation not mapped."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "LTF transfer aggregate only; recipient-by-recipient allocation not mapped.",
        "structuralRole": "Institution",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Reported through June 30, 2026; not a demonstrated Build American AI allocation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e147"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leading the Future",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$40m committee-transfer aggregate",
            "sourceName": "Leading the Future",
            "targetName": "Other political committees",
            "date": "Through 2026-06-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "anthropic",
      "label": "Anthropic",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Announced restricted support for Public First Action.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/anthropic",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "anthropic",
        "name": "Anthropic",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Announced restricted support for Public First Action.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Announced restricted support for Public First Action."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Announced restricted support for Public First Action.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Casar demands incident records",
            "text": "Casar’s September 2 release says Anthropic responded to requests but supplied insufficient detail, and seeks fuller records by September 15. The underlying response was not independently assessed in this pass.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Claude through Palantir and AWS",
            "text": "The November 2024 company release announced Claude integration through Palantir AIP, Amazon SageMaker and AWS-supported IL6 infrastructure. It establishes a supplier and implementation route, without disclosing equity, exclusivity or control rights. Individual deployment continuity after the 2026 dispute is unresolved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-claude",
              "w37-karp-e-aws"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A contractual restriction is not a technical veto",
            "text": "The August 2026 court opinion's factual account describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual: Anthropic could not see DoW prompts or technically intervene in the deployed model. The government and prime contractors performed pre-deployment testing; the department controlled when future versions would be deployed. An alleged operational veto should not be adopted as an established technical power.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
                "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "August 27 final relief and the choice to switch suppliers",
            "text": "Docket 251 in case 26-cv-01996-RFL vacates the challenged section 3252 designation and broad contractor boycott, and permanently enjoins specified implementation. Paragraph 14 expressly preserves lawful supplier choices: it neither requires continued use of Anthropic nor prevents lawful transition to another provider. The ruling therefore does not prove that any particular contract or deployment was restored.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-court-relief",
              "w37-karp-e-court-choice"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Separate procurement-security review",
            "text": "The D.C. Circuit public docket for consolidated cases 26-1049 and 26-1162 shows continued briefing through September 3, including a response to Anthropic's August 28 authorities letter. That snapshot does not establish a September 12 disposition. The separate FASCSA designation track should not be collapsed into the Northern California ruling.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D.C. Circuit docket26-1049, consolidated26-1162",
                "url": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations",
                "url": "https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "In September 2026, Dario Amodei committed Anthropic to ongoing outside reviewers with access comparable to internal risk staff. He proposed shared industry standards and government-supported coordination next. The planned reviewers could publish findings, with specified redactions; METR appears as an example, not an appointment. The contract, selected team and practical handling of access disputes remain the decisive missing records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
                "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "frontier-pacing-and-evaluator-access"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Evaluator publication rights",
            "text": "METR's published review says Anthropic had a general publication veto under a pilot NDA. METR reports no redactions and published methodological criticisms. This is a specific review-process right, not evidence that Anthropic vetoed or bought a conclusion.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR review, process appendix",
                "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-review-veto"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The court's factual account describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual, without Anthropic visibility into DoW prompts or technical intervention in deployed behavior.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
                "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Contractual use limits; no technical veto",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Amodei commits Anthropic to employee-like reviewer access and publication rights subject to specified redactions. No installed team or executed contract was established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-anthropic-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
                "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic embedded external-review commitment",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commits to ongoing outside evaluator access",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Anthropic embedded external-review commitment",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Casar's September 2 release says Anthropic answered August requests but withheld logs and sufficient answers; follow-up demanded fuller disclosure by September 15.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "METR says Anthropic had a general veto over publication of its February 2026 risk-report review under their pilot NDA.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-review-veto"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR review of Anthropic automated-R&D risk report",
                "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Held pilot review-publication veto",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Anthropic announces METR investigation of four incidents, with access beyond incident windows and to employees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-anthropic-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Signs independent-review agreement",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Docket 251 of 27 August 2026 vacates challenged measures and permanently enjoins specified implementation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-court-relief"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Designation and boycott vacated",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The November 2024 issuer release combines Claude, AIP, SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-claude"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Claude integration announced",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Anthropic identifies Irregular as the evaluation partner involved in the July disclosure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-irregular-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Investigating three incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cyber-evaluation supplier",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "METR and Anthropic: the actual levers",
            "text": "METR reports about $71m in recent commitments , says it accepts no frontier-lab funding or staff-directed donations, and acknowledges substantial free model tokens. It lists Anthropic among five labs providing evaluation access and tokens. Its donor list does not establish an Anthropic cash grant. Funding update · METR About .",
            "matched": [
              "Anthropic"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a9293a71ec5b6f0345631571708365009695a23eecd70c54cfec8f4f3a6e9c28"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Anthropic dispute: current court boundary",
            "text": "A separate designation track under 41 USC 4713/FASCSA is identified in September 3 legal commentary. D.C. Circuit cases 26-1049/26-1162 remained in briefing activity in the public mirror last retrieved September 3, including the government's response to Anthropic's August 28 additional-authority letter. No merits disposition is visible in that snapshot. The public mirror is not a September 12 live-PACER record. D.C. Circuit docket 26-1049, consolidated26-1162 ; secondary explanation: Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations .",
            "matched": [
              "Anthropic"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7578851efd6c535a287109fcf7a4f6e139f33b94f6bdc725b71748e623f41094"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Anthropic dispute: current court boundary",
            "text": "The accompanying four-page final-relief order, docket 251, vacates the section 3252 supply-chain designation and the broad prohibition on defense contractors doing business with Anthropic, and permanently enjoins implementation of the challenged actions against specified defendants. Paragraph 14 expressly preserves lawful actions, including choosing another AI provider; it does not require DoW to use Anthropic. Some claims/defendants were excluded, so this was not an unqualified victory on every claim. Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket 251 .",
            "matched": [
              "Anthropic"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9b2d29af8458a6a167da1a9abcea76f5b0f8e351f97514c2a83c74f90e2638f0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "METR and Anthropic: the actual levers",
            "text": "The sharper document is METR's review of Anthropic's February 2026 risk report . METR criticized the report's evidence and survey while agreeing, based partly on outside evidence, with its very-low-risk conclusion for Opus 4.6 R&D automation. In its process appendix, METR says Anthropic reviewed publication under an NDA and had a general veto during this pilot. METR says no redactions happened, published its criticism, and wants future review limited to sensitive-information redactions. A contractual veto is an independence risk; this record does not show that it was exercised or that METR's conclusion was purchased.",
            "matched": [
              "Anthropic"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "eb981b3aca38984667c148f92fd9062c04a8bf990aa9a618a821d3da1435a011"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
          },
          {
            "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic alignment-assessment amplification, 9 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
            "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
            "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
            "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
            "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
            "url": "https://metr.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Joe Benton biography",
            "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR review of Anthropic automated-R&D risk report",
            "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic's Pilot Sabotage Risk Report",
            "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Investigating three incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals"
          },
          {
            "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
            "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Advanced AI Framework",
            "url": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
          },
          {
            "title": "D.C. Circuit docket26-1049, consolidated26-1162",
            "url": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations",
            "url": "https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-16",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Anthropic develops Claude and participates in AI policy, commercial supply and government deployment. Its place in this network combines a model provider’s market power, announced funding for public advocacy and a disputed relationship with the US defense establishment over the terms on which its technology may be used.",
          "structuralRole": "AI supplier contesting policy, use conditions and government authority",
          "significance": "Anthropic exposes a central tension: a company can build capability, seek influence over its use and supply a state that claims its own authority. Contracts, deployment arrangements and courts determine how that bargaining works in practice.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Anthropic’s role begins with Claude, a commercially supplied AI system. Its early financing also connects it to this investigation’s philanthropic network: the company says Jaan Tallinn led its $124 million round in 2021. In July 2026 it announced a total of $40 million in support for Public First Action, with restrictions on election spending. Model development and public-policy activity are both part of its institutional footprint.",
            "Government deployment introduces other powerful actors. A November 2024 announcement described Claude integration through Palantir’s platform, Amazon SageMaker and AWS-supported infrastructure for US intelligence and defense operations. The pathway brings together a model developer, an integrator, a cloud provider and public customers with their own operational requirements.",
            "The 2026 defense litigation clarifies where control sat in one disputed deployment. The court’s factual account describes Claude Gov’s use restrictions as contractual: Anthropic could not see the department’s prompts or technically intervene in the deployed model. The government controlled when future versions would be deployed. The ability to state a permitted-use condition and the ability to operate the system were held differently.",
            "On August 27, the court vacated the challenged designation and broad contractor boycott and enjoined specified implementation, while preserving lawful government choices to move to other suppliers. That outcome makes this a useful example of contested power with an actual remedy. Anthropic can shape supply and advocate policy; government can purchase, demand and switch; courts can constrain how the public authority exercises those powers.",
            "In September 2026, Dario Amodei committed Anthropic to ongoing outside reviewers with access comparable to internal risk staff. He proposed shared industry standards and government-supported coordination next. The planned reviewers could publish findings, with specified redactions; METR appears as an example, not an appointment. The contract, selected team and practical handling of access disputes remain the decisive missing records."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
              "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
              "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
            },
            {
              "title": "Palantir issuer release, 2024-11-07",
              "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
              "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
              "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
              "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "publicfirst",
      "label": "Public First Action",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Separate from People First Marketing; Anthropic election-spending restriction.",
      "aliases": [
        "Public First Action"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/publicfirst",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "publicfirst",
        "name": "Public First Action",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Separate from People First Marketing; Anthropic election-spending restriction.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate from People First Marketing; Anthropic election-spending restriction."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Public First Action"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate from People First Marketing; Anthropic election-spending restriction.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "July 21, 2026 announcement restricts election spending. Not independently audited payment here; distinct from People First Marketing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e148"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$40m total announced support",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Public First Action",
            "date": "2026-07-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "What the operation was trying to do",
            "text": "The strongest new result therefore concerns purchased electoral capacity and service types. It does not close the retained Build American AI → SM4 → creator-prospect offer-only route. Public First Action remains a different entity with a different funding instrument; no inference here moves Anthropic's restricted gift into election spending.",
            "matched": [
              "Public First Action"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "059b17cd157a91455721a4545d8e3fe4b02b76abafc1b167fe1c9fe1a9234145"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Shared markets and disputed rules",
            "text": "The safety dispute crosses shared commercial markets. Anthropic's 21 July 2026 disclosure brings its announced Public First Action support to $40 million. Both donations are restricted to public education and policy and may not influence federal, state or local candidate elections. Anthropic advocates independent evaluation and government power to slow or block seriously dangerous deployments, a materially different allocation of authority from a16z's preferred approach. This is US Public First Action, distinct from the UK Public First consultancy commissioned by CLTR.",
            "matched": [
              "Public First Action"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "92bdf9e0761a7a37acc085dc830f1a7ce3bb307fadab9d8803276bb62e4c1ef5"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "buildai",
      "label": "Build American AI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "LTF affiliation and creator intermediary relationship reported by WIRED; no donor-to-creator allocation traced.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/buildai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "buildai",
        "name": "Build American AI",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "LTF affiliation and creator intermediary relationship reported by WIRED; no donor-to-creator allocation traced.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "LTF affiliation and creator intermediary relationship reported by WIRED; no donor-to-creator allocation traced."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Build American AI is an organisation described in WIRED reporting as affiliated with Leading the Future and connected to a creator-solicitation route through SM4. The retained record for this subject rests on that reported relationship rather than an acquired contract or a traceable allocation from named FEC donations.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported advocacy intermediary in a creator-pitch pathway",
        "significance": "The subject marks a possible route from organised AI-policy advocacy into sponsored creator messaging. Its connection is different from the separately filed LTF–Think Big–Lantern electoral route: overlapping political context does not establish that the same money financed both operations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the reported pitch establishes",
            "text": "WIRED describes a solicitation pathway involving Build American AI, SM4 and an offered creator fee. The retained evidence supports reporting on the offer and affiliation, but not a completed creator payment, the exact contracting legal entity or a donor-to-creator allocation. The subsequent discovery of Think Big's vendor filings adds a separate documented spending mechanism without resolving this offer-only branch.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e149",
              "e150"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Secondary report describes creator solicitation route; donor-to-creator allocation untraced.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e150"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SM4",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported intermediary pathway",
            "sourceName": "Build American AI",
            "targetName": "SM4",
            "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Secondary reporting; no transfer of named FEC donations traced to Build American AI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e149"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leading the Future",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported affiliation",
            "sourceName": "Leading the Future",
            "targetName": "Build American AI",
            "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "What the operation was trying to do",
            "text": "The strongest new result therefore concerns purchased electoral capacity and service types. It does not close the retained Build American AI → SM4 → creator-prospect offer-only route. Public First Action remains a different entity with a different funding instrument; no inference here moves Anthropic's restricted gift into election spending.",
            "matched": [
              "Build American AI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "059b17cd157a91455721a4545d8e3fe4b02b76abafc1b167fe1c9fe1a9234145"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sm4",
      "label": "SM4",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Reported creator-pitch intermediary.",
      "aliases": [
        "SM4"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/sm4",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "sm4",
        "name": "SM4",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Reported creator-pitch intermediary.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported creator-pitch intermediary."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "SM4"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "SM4 is the intermediary named in reporting on a creator pitch associated with Build American AI. Its role in the retained evidence is solicitation: approaching a prospective creator with a proposed paid message. The record does not establish completed production or payment.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported broker between an advocacy organisation and a prospective creator",
        "significance": "An intermediary can translate an organisation's communications objective into the language, format and price of a creator commission. That is the relevant mechanism here. The distinction between an offer and an executed campaign prevents a quoted fee from being treated as verified spending or proof of influence on an audience.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The $5,000 figure is an offer",
            "text": "WIRED reports a $5,000 pitch through the Build American AI–SM4 pathway. No acquired agreement, invoice, payment record or published deliverable completes that route. The separate campaign-finance records naming Lantern Production Consultants do not identify SM4 as a subcontractor and cannot be used to assign those filed amounts to this creator prospect.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e150",
              "e151"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Secondary report describes creator solicitation route; donor-to-creator allocation untraced.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e150"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Build American AI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported intermediary pathway",
            "sourceName": "Build American AI",
            "targetName": "SM4",
            "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Offer only; completed payment unobserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e151"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Creator prospect",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported $5,000 pitch",
            "sourceName": "SM4",
            "targetName": "Creator prospect",
            "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "What the operation was trying to do",
            "text": "The strongest new result therefore concerns purchased electoral capacity and service types. It does not close the retained Build American AI → SM4 → creator-prospect offer-only route. Public First Action remains a different entity with a different funding instrument; no inference here moves Anthropic's restricted gift into election spending.",
            "matched": [
              "SM4"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "059b17cd157a91455721a4545d8e3fe4b02b76abafc1b167fe1c9fe1a9234145"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pitchcreator",
      "label": "Creator prospect",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Reported $5,000 offer; completed payment unobserved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pitchcreator",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pitchcreator",
        "name": "Creator prospect",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Reported $5,000 offer; completed payment unobserved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported $5,000 offer; completed payment unobserved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reported $5,000 offer; completed payment unobserved.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Offer only; completed payment unobserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e151"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SM4",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported $5,000 pitch",
            "sourceName": "SM4",
            "targetName": "Creator prospect",
            "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "conbackers",
      "label": "Conjecture's 2022 venture backers",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/conbackers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "conbackers",
        "name": "Conjecture's 2022 venture backers",
        "role": "Funder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Funder",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Launch names Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown. No onward ControlAI transfer documented.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e95"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Conjecture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed 2022 venture backing",
            "sourceName": "Conjecture's 2022 venture backers",
            "targetName": "Conjecture",
            "date": "2022-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "xai",
      "label": "xAI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/xai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "xai",
        "name": "xAI",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e69"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
                "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Professional adviser",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "xAI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
            "title": "Response/outcome search: 22 August 2025 NAAG deepfake-NCII letters",
            "heading": "False-positive and chronology boundaries",
            "text": "Civitai/Pornhub interventions cited as precedents in the letters must stay antecedent examples. This pass did not freshly investigate their events or infer they were caused by the later letters. Steam/adult-game restrictions, separate AI-company letters, xAI actions, vaping and other branches were excluded. Search results about those subjects were discovery noise, not accepted evidence. Company measures or legislative activity that predate22August2025 cannot be counted as responses merely because search returned them; no complete policy-version history was reconstructed.",
            "matched": [
              "xAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "115665b1eca140c5b153d9da0bddb2ad87c622a3ad9871d60a428710641d2b93"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "scale",
      "label": "Scale AI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/scale",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "scale",
        "name": "Scale AI",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Hendrycks advisory connection; no campaign funding established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e70"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
                "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Professional adviser",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "Scale AI",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "deepmind",
      "label": "DeepMind",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Historical Tallinn investor-director relationship.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/deepmind",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "deepmind",
        "name": "DeepMind",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Historical Tallinn investor-director relationship.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical Tallinn investor-director relationship."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DeepMind is an AI research organisation appearing in the retained network through both a historical investment relationship and current support for multi-agent safety research. Future of Life Institute's biography describes Jaan Tallinn as a former DeepMind investor-director; a separate research call names DeepMind among supporting parties considering applications.",
        "structuralRole": "AI research organisation connecting historical investment networks with a current research-funding agenda",
        "significance": "These two relationships operate at different levels. A former investor-director links professional histories, while participation in a research call can help select which technical questions receive support. Neither establishes a DeepMind transfer into an advocacy campaign or the governance rights of an unnamed legal grantor.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Research influence without a fabricated money trail",
            "text": "The multi-agent call concerns safety in settings where several AI systems interact, and the associated agenda credits DeepMind's Distributional AGI Safety work among its inspirations. Topics include identity, authentication, admission controls and revocation. The public material names joint consideration of applications without disclosing individual contributions, voting arrangements or recusals. The Tallinn biography establishes a historical professional connection with unspecified dates, rather than a current board position or campaign-finance relationship.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
                "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e56",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
              "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
              "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
                "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
            "sourceName": "DeepMind",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical professional connection; no DeepMind campaign transfer established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e56"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former investor-director",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "Historical; dates unspecified"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Investor and founder announcements name Google DeepMind as a partner.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-irregular-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
                "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lab security collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Redwood identifies DeepMind among its advisory relationships.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
                "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Redwood Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advises on misalignment risk",
            "sourceName": "Redwood Research",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Irving lists earlier DeepMind team leadership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former Scalable Alignment Team lead",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Epoch discloses evaluation on FrontierMath.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Epoch AI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2026 co-mathematician evaluation",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass",
            "heading": "What the agenda can and cannot show",
            "text": "Schmidt explicitly credits DeepMind's Distributional AGI Safety work, ARIA's Scaling Trust thesis and CAIF's Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI report as inspirations. The agenda includes identity/authentication, admission controls, proof of agent/human credentials, platform vetting and revocation as research topics. It prioritizes strengthening existing infrastructure partly because incumbent protocols may become entrenched. These are concrete agenda choices relevant to the assurance inquiry.",
            "matched": [
              "DeepMind"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ba025eab7fbdf398747a7b05f064f9f4c171cb4232c4bb200ebd82a0684ef3a0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "Philanthropic money before the venture announcement",
            "text": "Sequoia’s investment account explains the commercial proposition unusually clearly: close work with Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind; pre-release security testing; defenses; and compliance standards and roadmaps. This is a business selling expertise in a field where that expertise can help shape the rules.",
            "matched": [
              "DeepMind"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "999274e419a37621ffdadda21cd39b9ecf5096171addeaacd2b1e988934cd7a0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence",
            "heading": "From a funded project to something people use",
            "text": "Epoch also supplies technical consultations and benchmark work to government and industry. Redwood, another Coefficient grantee, describes advisory relationships with DeepMind and Anthropic and a joint safety-case paper with UK AISI. Funding sustains the people who produce the measurements and frameworks institutions consult when making decisions.",
            "matched": [
              "DeepMind"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fe034ea01b8df6463934d30b2a4b30d16459c4ded7ee8add6d61086cfd5b2ac2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Most consequential findings",
            "text": "A September 2022 policy panel hosted by the Center for Data Innovation places him beside FLI's Anthony Aguirre, DeepMind's Alexandra Belias, Hugging Face's Irene Solaiman, and Kai Zenner, then head of office and digital policy adviser to MEP Axel Voss. It is a concrete earlier point of contact with the FLI and European policy worlds. It establishes coappearance, not an alliance or payment. [M01]",
            "matched": [
              "DeepMind"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e38607b332202c3138fc6edc30e28b14a291c8391448c1a1bd1399c8f81fd40b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          },
          {
            "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
            "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
            "url": "https://naml.us/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "omidyar",
      "label": "Omidyar Network",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Omidyar Network Fund Inc; charitable grants are not eBay corporate payments.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/omidyar",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "omidyar",
        "name": "Omidyar Network",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Omidyar Network Fund Inc; charitable grants are not eBay corporate payments.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Omidyar Network Fund Inc; charitable grants are not eBay corporate payments."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar biography",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Omidyar Network is the philanthropic organization co-founded by Pierre Omidyar. The funding records here concern Omidyar Network Fund Inc, whose tax returns disclose general operating support to 5Rights. Its own campaign statement also credits support for the coalition behind California's 2022 design-code law.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed philanthropic funder of an advocacy organization and coalition supporter",
        "significance": "General operating support can sustain an organization's staff and activities across a portfolio without naming a particular bill as its purpose. The tax returns and campaign acknowledgment therefore provide complementary evidence of resources and public support, while leaving the budget of a specific lobbying engagement unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Amounts and timing",
            "text": "The 2021 return reports US$600,000 paid to 5Rights as general operating support; the 2023 return reports US$850,000 on the same basis. A 15 September 2022 statement credits support with Reset for coalition mobilization and passage of California's code. These are charitable-entity payments, not eBay corporate payments. The later 2023 payment cannot be assigned to the earlier 2022 contract without additional financial records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar biography",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              },
              {
                "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e152",
              "e153",
              "e154",
              "e155"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "General operating support paid during 2023; this later payment cannot fund an earlier 2022 transaction without additional evidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e154"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$850k paid · 2023",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "General operating support paid during 2021; no earmarking to the lobbying contract established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e153"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$600k paid · 2021",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "2021"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Funder credits support with Reset for mobilisation and passage of California’s code.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e155"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB2273",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "15 Sep 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official biography names Pierre Omidyar as co-founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e152"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar biography",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pierre Omidyar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-founded",
            "sourceName": "Pierre Omidyar",
            "targetName": "Omidyar Network",
            "date": "Biography read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Launch names Omidyar Network in steering structure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-omidyar-steering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering committee",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar biography",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          },
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pierre-omidyar",
      "label": "Pierre Omidyar",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "eBay founder and Omidyar Network co-founder.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pierre-omidyar",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pierre-omidyar",
        "name": "Pierre Omidyar",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "eBay founder and Omidyar Network co-founder.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "eBay founder and Omidyar Network co-founder."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar biography",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Pierre Omidyar is the founder of eBay and a co-founder of Omidyar Network, as identified by the Network's official biography.",
        "structuralRole": "Founder connection to the philanthropic organization",
        "significance": "This is an origin and institutional identity relationship. It helps readers understand the name behind the funder while preserving the distinction between a founder's business history and the legal entity making a charitable payment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "The documented connection is co-founding Omidyar Network. Grant records elsewhere in the case belong to Omidyar Network Fund Inc; this biography alone does not identify a personal instruction, a bill-specific donation or an eBay corporate payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar biography",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e152"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official biography names Pierre Omidyar as co-founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e152"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar biography",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omidyar Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-founded",
            "sourceName": "Pierre Omidyar",
            "targetName": "Omidyar Network",
            "date": "Biography read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar biography",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "oak",
      "label": "Oak Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A foundation funding work across human rights, child protection and other causes, with resources originating in the Duty Free Shoppers business Alan Parker helped build.",
      "aliases": [
        "Oak Foundation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "International grantmaker"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/oak",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "oak",
        "name": "Oak Foundation",
        "role": "International grantmaker",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "A foundation funding work across human rights, child protection and other causes, with resources originating in the Duty Free Shoppers business Alan Parker helped build.",
        "why": "Oak funds organisations on several sides of disputes about online safety and civil liberties. Its grants make it a financial junction, while the disagreements between recipients complicate a single-agenda explanation.",
        "about": [
          "Published awards include three-year core support of $2 million to 5Rights in its 2023 report and $2,368,421 to WeProtect in its 2025 report. These are multiyear awards, not yearly spending figures.",
          "Its 2025 report also lists Check My Ads, Statewatch and Digital Freedom Fund. Statewatch opposed broad scanning and possible identity requirements in an EU child-abuse proposal; WeProtect supported mandatory detection with safeguards in an earlier version of that debate."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Oak Foundation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
          "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 16
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A foundation funding work across human rights, child protection and other causes, with resources originating in the Duty Free Shoppers business Alan Parker helped build.",
        "structuralRole": "A donor supporting competing policy positions",
        "significance": "Oak is an upstream source of resources for several important organisations in this investigation. Its recipients include online-safety advocates and civil-liberties groups that disagree with each other. Its network therefore makes both institutional support and policy conflict visible.",
        "background": [
          "Published awards include three-year core support of $2 million to 5Rights in its 2023 report and $2,368,421 to WeProtect in its 2025 report. These are multiyear awards, not yearly spending figures.",
          "Its 2025 report also lists Check My Ads, Statewatch and Digital Freedom Fund. Statewatch opposed broad scanning and possible identity requirements in an EU child-abuse proposal; WeProtect supported mandatory detection with safeguards in an earlier version of that debate."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p16 income under accrual policy at p12. Not proof of a same-year wire or the later 2025 award; restricted project balance is a different measure. Financial details: value: 553,829; currency: EUR; kind: recognised grant income; period: 2023 consolidated group",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-oak-income2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names Oak in consolidated recognised grant income",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "date": "Financial year 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Oak's current programme strategy combines media pluralism, reliable information and an open/accountable digital environment. Strategy is not a specific grant agreement, common political position or instruction to each recipient.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-oakstrategy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak International Human Rights programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a human-rights funding strategy",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Oak International Human Rights programme",
            "date": "Undated webpage read2026-09-09."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Generic Oak process; named decisionmakers for 5 Rights/WeProtect were not recovered. Applicant and Oak sign a grant letter before the transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-senior-decision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak senior funding-decision roles",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "receive recommendations and approve or decline grants",
            "sourceName": "Oak senior funding-decision roles",
            "targetName": "Oak Foundation",
            "date": "Undated process guide currently linked8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Hub and WeProtect publications name Oak support. Amount, grant recipient and routing for each programme instrument must remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-oak-hub"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "acknowledges support for the joint initiative",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "2023 launch; current hub page captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Oak traces its resources to Duty Free Shoppers, which Parker helped build. 2023 report also lists him among trustees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e159"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alan Parker",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Source of wealth / trustee",
            "sourceName": "Alan Parker",
            "targetName": "Oak Foundation",
            "date": "2023 report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Exact award $2,368,421, core support. Not proof of a one-time cash receipt or the whole funding of WeProtect.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e161"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$2.368m award / 3 years",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "2025 report"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current official professional role; no named award approval inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Helena Duch",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "heads Solutions sub-programme within Prevent Child Sexual Abuse",
            "sourceName": "Helena Duch",
            "targetName": "Oak Foundation",
            "date": "Captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Core-support award in the 2023 report; not an annual payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e160"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$2m award / 3 years",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "2023 report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
            "title": "Oak support for Check My Ads: a verified grant, bounded terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Oak Foundation is a major philanthropic source behind several of this investigation's most connected organizations. Its grants support child-protection advocacy, advertising-risk work and digital-rights challenges. The foundation traces its resources to the Duty Free Shoppers business associated with Alan Parker.",
          "structuralRole": "Financing durable capacity across competing approaches to digital governance",
          "significance": "Oak matters because its grants help organizations keep researchers, campaigners and legal expertise in place. Its recipients pursue different interventions, including stronger safety controls and challenges to surveillance, exposing real conflicts within the same funding landscape.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Oak Foundation is an upstream source of money for several distinct parts of this network. Its resources originated in the Duty Free Shoppers business Alan Parker helped build; its 2023 report also lists him as a trustee. The foundation funds work across child protection, human rights and other causes, often through multiyear awards that support an organization's continuing capacity.",
            "Its 2023 report lists $2 million over three years for 5Rights and $2,368,421 over three years for WeProtect. Those grants support institutions that campaign, commission research and work with policymakers on digital safety. The same report lists $903,614 over three years for the Global Disinformation Index to expand technological work on online disinformation. Oak has described that work in terms of changing the commercial incentives that sustain disinformation.",
            "Its funding also supports organizations resisting intrusive uses of technology and public authority. The 2023 awards include $783,133 for Liberty, $437,349 for Open Rights Group's work with refugee and migrant sectors, and $1,138,554 for Privacy International. Oak's 2025 report adds core-support awards for Check My Ads and the Digital Freedom Fund. The purposes range from advertising transparency to litigation capacity, surveillance safeguards and accountability for data use.",
            "This makes Oak a consequential source of institutional staying power. Multiyear support lets a small organization keep specialists employed, produce arguments and remain present while rules develop. It also gives the network an important complication: organizations receiving support from the same foundation can disagree over the proper reach of digital controls. The award purposes explain what Oak chose to resource; the grantees' decisions and outputs show what that support helped them do."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
              "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
              "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "alan-parker",
      "label": "Alan Parker",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A businessman associated with the Duty Free Shoppers business from which Oak Foundation describes its resources as originating.",
      "aliases": [
        "Parker",
        "Duty Free Shoppers"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Oak founding wealth"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/alan-parker",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "alan-parker",
        "name": "Alan Parker",
        "role": "Oak founding wealth",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "A businessman associated with the Duty Free Shoppers business from which Oak Foundation describes its resources as originating.",
        "why": "He helps explain where the foundation’s funding capacity came from. That question is distinct from who approves a particular grant today.",
        "about": [
          "Oak’s published grant process describes programme-officer recommendations and senior funding decisions. The investigation has not identified an instruction from Parker directing a particular recipient campaign."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Parker",
          "Duty Free Shoppers"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Alan Parker is a businessman associated with building Duty Free Shoppers, the business from which Oak Foundation traces its resources. Oak’s 2023 annual report also lists him among its trustees.",
        "structuralRole": "Origin of wealth and foundation trusteeship",
        "significance": "Parker helps explain where Oak’s financial capacity originated and appears in its trustee record. His importance lies upstream of the grantee network. The next step in tracing an individual award is the foundation’s recommendation, approval and grant-letter process.",
        "background": [
          "Oak’s published grant process describes programme-officer recommendations and senior funding decisions. The investigation has not identified an instruction from Parker directing a particular recipient campaign."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Oak traces its resources to Duty Free Shoppers, which Parker helped build. 2023 report also lists him among trustees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e159"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Source of wealth / trustee",
            "sourceName": "Alan Parker",
            "targetName": "Oak Foundation",
            "date": "2023 report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The new evidence identifies institutional budget rights, an amended funding route, a commissioned research product and a named Oak contribution to that product. It does not identify Alan Parker as the decisionmaker behind the two existing grants, or establish a donor veto over WeProtect publications. The useful geometry is two partly connected chains: Oak → Safe Futures Hub → commissioned review, with named advisory input; and external donors → Dutch WeProtect foundation → budget-constrained UK operating company. Their exact grant instruments still matter.",
            "matched": [
              "Alan Parker",
              "Parker"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "99228feac0ec9aaf648cc397c6fb092a8424b96a086856ab21c8c84ff8d3f191"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "prudence",
      "label": "Prudence Trust",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Published multiyear core-work award to 5Rights.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/prudence",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "prudence",
        "name": "Prudence Trust",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Published multiyear core-work award to 5Rights.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published multiyear core-work award to 5Rights."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published multiyear core-work award to 5Rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Core work including legal standards, research, compliance and technical norms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e162"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
                "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£745,500 award · 2025–28",
            "sourceName": "Prudence Trust",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "Awarded 25 Sep 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rothschild-foundation",
      "label": "Rothschild Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Specific UK charity 1138145; not a proxy for every institution with this name.",
      "aliases": [
        "Rothschild Foundation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/rothschild-foundation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "rothschild-foundation",
        "name": "Rothschild Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Specific UK charity 1138145; not a proxy for every institution with this name.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Specific UK charity 1138145; not a proxy for every institution with this name."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Rothschild Foundation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Specific UK charity 1138145; not a proxy for every institution with this name.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Research award; cash disbursement not verified. Historical zero disbursement field is not a current payment total.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e163"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
                "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£150k award · AI / EdTech",
            "sourceName": "Rothschild Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "Awarded 18 Jul 2025; planned 2025–28"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "capitol-connection",
      "label": "Capitol Connection",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "capconn LLC. Paid contractor to 5Rights for California AB2273 lobbying.",
      "aliases": [
        "Capitol Connection"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/capitol-connection",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "capitol-connection",
        "name": "Capitol Connection",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "capconn LLC. Paid contractor to 5Rights for California AB2273 lobbying.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "capconn LLC. Paid contractor to 5Rights for California AB2273 lobbying."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Capitol Connection"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Capitol Connection, legally capconn LLC, was 5Rights Foundation's paid lobbying contractor for the 2022 California Age-Appropriate Design Code campaign. Its Foreign Agents Registration Act filing contains the engagement contract, reported receipts and activity logs, exposing practical work behind the legislative advocacy.",
        "structuralRole": "Paid intermediary moving drafts, amendments and coalition material through California offices",
        "significance": "The firm supplies the documentary middle between foundation funding and a bill: specific work products, recipients and negotiations. That makes it possible to examine what a contractor was paid to do and which offices it approached, rather than assuming a funder's donation directly caused a legislative provision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "The contract covered May–September 2022 at US$10,000 a month; five reported US$10,000 receipts total US$50,000. Logs describe background-sheet drafts, proposed author amendments, a UK–California comparison chart and coalition-letter submissions. The client owned contract work, while specified nonpublic disclosure and expenses required consent or advance approval. The filing does not show a blanket editorial-approval clause or establish which party originated every transmitted amendment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e157",
              "e158",
              "w3-5r-e-background-drafts",
              "w3-5r-e-proposed-amendments",
              "w3-5r-e-comparison-chart",
              "w3-5r-e-governor-amendments",
              "w3-5r-e-coalition-submission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Contract for May-September2022 services at USD10,000/month; five USD10,000 receipts are reported over date ranges, not exact bank dates. Client owns contract work including drafts; specified nonpublic disclosure and expenses require consent/advance approval. No blanket editorial-approval clause or exercised output approval established. Neither a UK-government source nor the later2023 Oak award is established as this contract funding. Financial details: value: 50,000; currency: USD; kind: five registrant-reported receipts; period: Ranges June2-October4,2022 for May-September services; see filingp21",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e157"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$50k · paid lobbying contract",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "Capitol Connection",
            "date": "Services 2022; filed 27 Jun 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Registrant logs record actual background-sheet exchanges, proposed author amendments, coalition-letter submissions and negotiations in2022. Separately filed letters and California analyses supply work-product counterparts. Filing and transmission do not establish authorship or client approval of every item.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e158"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB2273",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lobbying and amendment negotiation",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "May–September 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Logp18 and filed chart are a document-family match, not a verified byte-identical attachment match. Chart advocates cross-jurisdiction alignment; it does not confer UK legal authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-comparison-chart"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eric Dang",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sending UK/California comparison chart",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Eric Dang",
            "date": "2022-08-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFp15 and filed June10 letter. Strong document-family match; exact email attachment/headers absent. Filing/dissemination does not establish authorship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-coalition-submission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Senate Judiciary Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported submitting coalition support letter",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "California Senate Judiciary Committee",
            "date": "2022-06-21"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFp14. Actual draft attachments and approval replies not acquired. Recipient is staff; do not collapse into proof Wicks personally reviewed the draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-background-drafts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Shannon McKinley",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sending committee-background drafts",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Shannon McKinley",
            "date": "2022-06-09/10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFpp18–19. Records access and activity; no approval instruction or governor decision receipt.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-governor-amendments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christine Aurre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sharing amendment summaries and opposition-response updates",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Christine Aurre",
            "date": "2022-08-10/15/23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFp18. Attachment missing; originator, exact changes and acceptance unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-proposed-amendments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Aaron Skaggs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sending proposed author amendments",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Aaron Skaggs",
            "date": "2022-08-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ab2273",
      "label": "California AB2273",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code campaign. Current enforcement and litigation are outside this investigation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ab2273",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ab2273",
        "name": "California AB2273",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code campaign. Current enforcement and litigation are outside this investigation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code campaign. Current enforcement and litigation are outside this investigation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "California AB2273 is the 2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code legislation and campaign tracked here. It adapted a child-centered design approach for California, with 5Rights as a co-sponsor and a lobbying operation that generated background material, amendment exchanges and coalition advocacy.",
        "structuralRole": "California legislative adaptation linking a UK policy model with funded local campaigning",
        "significance": "The campaign joins several mechanisms often collapsed into a single influence claim: philanthropic support, legislative sponsorship, contracted lobbying and negotiated bill text. Following each separately reveals both the resources behind the effort and the local offices through which proposals moved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The 2022 design and campaign",
            "text": "Official analyses identify 5Rights sponsorship. The historical chaptered text covered under-18s and allowed a business to apply child protections to all consumers instead of estimating age. Omidyar's September 2022 statement credited coalition support with Reset, while Capitol Connection's filing logs document lobbying and amendment negotiations. Kidron advocated retaining under-18 coverage, but the retained records do not attribute that final provision exclusively to her. Present enforcement and litigation are outside this historical profile.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
                "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              },
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e1",
              "e155",
              "e156",
              "e158"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Registrant logs record actual background-sheet exchanges, proposed author amendments, coalition-letter submissions and negotiations in2022. Separately filed letters and California analyses supply work-product counterparts. Filing and transmission do not establish authorship or client approval of every item.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e158"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lobbying and amendment negotiation",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "May–September 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Original2022 California analyses confirm5Rights co-sponsorship. Chaptered text under18 coverage and allowed applying child protections to all consumers instead of estimating age. Kidron sought under18, but causation of the final provision and present enforceability were not assessed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e1"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
                "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Sponsored California adaptation",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "Historical UK / California codes"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Funder credits support with Reset for mobilisation and passage of California’s code.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e155"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omidyar Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "15 Sep 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Named by Omidyar as supporting the coalition; no amount assigned.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e156"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
            "sourceName": "Reset",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "15 Sep 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "reset",
      "label": "Reset",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Omidyar credits joint support for the California coalition in September 2022.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/reset",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "reset",
        "name": "Reset",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Omidyar credits joint support for the California coalition in September 2022.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Omidyar credits joint support for the California coalition in September 2022."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reset is the organizational brand named in records of support for California's design-code coalition and the UK's Online Safety Network. Its privacy notice describes shared operating infrastructure and covers multiple federated legal entities, including Reset Tech UK Limited.",
        "structuralRole": "Cross-jurisdiction support and operating infrastructure for advocacy networks",
        "significance": "Support can take the form of money, convening capacity or the systems that keep a network functioning. The retained records identify coalition support and a website, newsletter and shared inbox operator, making those practical forms of capacity visible. They do not collapse the federation into one legal contracting party.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Three documented roles",
            "text": "Omidyar's 15 September 2022 statement names Reset as a supporter of the California AB2273 coalition. Carnegie's October 2023 transition account names it as a supporter of the new Online Safety Act Network. The network's privacy notice identifies Reset as operator of its communications systems and describes an informal collaboration without formal membership. The exact entity responsible for every cost or contract is not established by those brand-level statements.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
              },
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e156",
              "w11-fund-e-reset-network",
              "w12-gov-e-reset-operates-network",
              "w12-gov-e-uk-notice-entity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Named by Omidyar as supporting the coalition; no amount assigned.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e156"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
                "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB2273",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
            "sourceName": "Reset",
            "targetName": "California AB2273",
            "date": "15 Sep 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Explicit Reset operational role and shared systems/records. Informal network has no formal membership; notice federation is not a merger or proof UK company alone contracts for all costs. Tor/VPN advice and limited technical-data retention are stated policies, not verified practice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-reset-operates-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "notice identifies operator of website, newsletter and shared inbox",
            "sourceName": "Reset",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Carnegie identifies former partner Reset as supporting new network. Historical brand attribution only; exact contracting entity, amount, host and present2026 funding unknown. No automatic merge with Australian Reset.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "identified as supporter in dated transition account",
            "sourceName": "Reset",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": "26October2023 statement; support period not obtained"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "UK company named in privacy-notice coverage; single-organization treatment is for notice purposes. No equity ownership, cross-border parent instruction or sole OSN contractor established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-notice-entity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "listed among notice-covered federated legal entities",
            "sourceName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "targetName": "Reset",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "Succession and Reset support",
            "text": "Carnegie's26October2023 transition statement says its programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through the new Online Safety Act Network, supported by former partner Reset. The2023 report independently says Carnegie supported development of the new network. This establishes deliberate succession of expertise and convening work after enactment, not ownership of the network or transfer of every employee/asset.",
            "matched": [
              "Reset"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fe9456cb4c3da9b90e571a914523e681b12c1f5704f7082b8c4d7d4481f21316"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "High-information records now specified",
            "text": "Acquisition stopped at this coherent funding-to-output breakpoint. Root must integrate Reset's parallel return and explicitly reassess the whole case before selecting another acquisition run.",
            "matched": [
              "Reset"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "597d20fc7989f2b687a7e192637d6069c3e59ba9d30f0d0c6377a7a43b8c915b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records",
            "heading": "What the 2024 accounts expose and leave unresolved",
            "text": "Year-end cash is GBP 40,997 in HSBC UK accounts. This identifies a banking relationship, not bank direction over advocacy. Note 7 puts GBP 1,156 receivable from Reset Tech Action gGmbH and GBP 10,743 directors' loan under debtors. The latter is owed to the company, not a director's funding contribution; individual identity and terms are not disclosed there. The named intercompany receivable is a concrete accounting relation, but does not identify all group transactions or establish parent control.",
            "matched": [
              "Reset"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "51528ffd4773c2725237eed0786c25a5edf92dd3e332bf94f34f83cbe6c2ba81"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records",
            "heading": "Evidential consequence",
            "text": "The supported path is informal collaboration hosted through Reset's shared operating infrastructure, with identifiable UK company directors, constitutional decision rules and some group accounting relations. It is not yet a demonstrated single legal entity controlling all federated activity. The missing records with high value are the OSN operating/transition agreement, division of employer and contracting responsibilities, related-party service arrangements, member register and basis for PSC notices, plus any network budget or delegated editorial authority. Public procedures make these plausible targets but do not prove a particular document or clause exists.",
            "matched": [
              "Reset"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "65f9cccd6d19cf160e425a85c575cf6fb72dd6a9c98ecefc0017da06cb3d02eb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cross-street-films",
      "label": "Cross Street Films",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Parliamentary assistance declared in Kidron’s register; no allocation to the AI amendment established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cross-street-films",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cross-street-films",
        "name": "Cross Street Films",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Parliamentary assistance declared in Kidron’s register; no allocation to the AI amendment established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Parliamentary assistance declared in Kidron’s register; no allocation to the AI amendment established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Parliamentary assistance declared in Kidron’s register; no allocation to the AI amendment established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Employees/offices provide parliamentary assistance; register does not attribute it to the AI amendment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e164"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
                "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Declared parliamentary assistance",
            "sourceName": "Cross Street Films",
            "targetName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "date": "Register read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "common-sense-media",
      "label": "Common Sense Media",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Kidron declares paid summit travel in March 2026; no amendment-specific support attributed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/common-sense-media",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "common-sense-media",
        "name": "Common Sense Media",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Kidron declares paid summit travel in March 2026; no amendment-specific support attributed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Kidron declares paid summit travel in March 2026; no amendment-specific support attributed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Common Sense Media is a child-focused media and technology advocacy organization whose retained activity includes Australian safety-design consultation and support for a UK parliamentarian's summit travel. Its public filings provide specific recommendations on how age assurance should perform and protect privacy.",
        "structuralRole": "Civil-society participant translating child-safety concerns into implementation requirements",
        "significance": "The useful connection is technical specificity: the organization asked a regulator to explain acceptable errors, fallback procedures and data minimization. Such requests can shape the practical burdens of a safety framework. A separate travel disclosure concerns access and convening, and should be read on its own financial basis.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Australian input and declared travel",
            "text": "Comments dated 31 October 2025 report participation in eSafety's December 2024 workshop and seek clearer age-assurance performance and privacy requirements in the Designing for Safety draft. They cite a New York proposed-rulemaking model. Separately, Kidron's parliamentary register declares Common Sense Media-paid travel for a 22–24 March 2026 summit. The records do not establish adoption of the requested draft changes or an amendment-specific travel earmark.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
                "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
              },
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
              },
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-workshop",
              "w6-draft-e-csm-publication",
              "w6-draft-e-csm-age-detail",
              "e165"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "P2 calls for acceptable error rates, fallback procedures and data-minimization clarity, citing a NewYork proposed-rulemaking model. This records a specific requested change; adoption and underlying US law were not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-age-detail"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests clearer age-assurance performance and privacy requirements in",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
            "date": "31October 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Comments name Common Sense Media as sender; publisher filings directory links the exactPDF under2025 and International.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authors and publicly lists",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "date": "Comments dated31October 2025; upload date unknown; publicly observed8September2026local"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "March 2026 summit travel; not support earmarked to ControlAI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e165"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
                "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Declared paid summit travel",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "date": "22–24 Mar 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The31October 2025 comments p1 describe inclusion in eSafety December2024 workshop. This is the participant's account; no attendance roster independently acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-workshop"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports participation in",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
            "date": "December2024 participation retrospectively reported31October 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "home-office",
      "label": "UK Home Office",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Government records historical funding and a permanent WeProtect board seat.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/home-office",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "home-office",
        "name": "UK Home Office",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Government records historical funding and a permanent WeProtect board seat.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Government records historical funding and a permanent WeProtect board seat."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK Home Office is a government department represented here through child-safety funding, a permanent WeProtect board seat, counter-terrorism infrastructure guidance and procurement. Its records span historical support, policy participation and a proposed 2026 technology pilot, each with a different legal and financial status.",
        "structuralRole": "Government department combining funding, board participation, guidance and purchasing",
        "significance": "The department can influence a field through several concrete channels: supplying resources, taking part in governance, setting policy expectations and buying services. The differences matter because voluntary guidance creates a different obligation from a contract, and a pending award is different from money already paid.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated roles and instruments",
            "text": "The 2021 child-abuse strategy described the Home Office as WeProtect's sole donor up to that point and recorded its permanent board seat; later donors make that a historical claim. June 2024 minutes record a five-country briefing. Its February 2024 infrastructure guidance is voluntary. A September 2026 notice proposes a TCAP pilot with estimated signature on 14 September and a displayed £192,000 excluding VAT; the retained record contains no executed agreement or payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
              },
              {
                "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
              },
              {
                "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
                "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e166",
              "e167",
              "n33",
              "w26-ver-e-home-office-guide",
              "w26-ver-e-home-office-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Notice gives discovery, analysis and bulk-referral scope; pending contract, estimated signature 14 September 2026 and term to 15 March 2027. GBP 192,000 ex VAT and 240,000 inc VAT are displayed without reconciliation. No executed agreement or payment. Financial details: value: 192,000; currency: GBP; kind: displayed pending contract value excluding VAT not payment; period: estimated 14 September 2026–15 March 2027",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-home-office-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
                "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a pending direct-award pilot notice",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "June 2024 minutes record the Home Office update and an August response timeframe for early September ministerial meetings in Australia. Final briefings/adoption not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n33"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefed board on five-country work",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "June 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "HomeOfficeGrant–RP:FY2025£225000 and FY2024comparative£150000 incoming/expended. Stated VAWG purpose does not prove StopNCII funding or a classification instruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-homeoffice-swgfl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is recorded as restricted support for violence-against-women work",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "UK strategy describes sole financial donor status up to that point. Subsequent donors mean this is not a current sole-funder claim. Amount not specified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e166"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Historical sole donor · 2021",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "2021 strategy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Guidance creates no legal obligation, while describing distinct existing legal duties and proportionate measures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-home-office-guide"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK voluntary infrastructure guidance — 2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued voluntary provider guidance",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "UK voluntary infrastructure guidance — 2024",
            "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Government records a permanent seat; current board page includes Home Office representation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e167"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Permanent board seat",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "2021 strategy; board read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "March2026 strategy§55 says Home Office andDCMS launched a partnership withIABUK under the taskforce, to report to ministers early2027. This dated account is not an accepted report/output or compulsory identity regime.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-home-office"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named a launcher of the anti-fraud advertising partnership",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
            "title": "UK procurement and policy: what can presently be joined"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "european-commission",
      "label": "European Commission",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The EU executive, with responsibilities including enforcement of the Digital Services Act for very large online platforms.",
      "aliases": [
        "EU",
        "DSA",
        "Digital Services Act"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "EU executive institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/european-commission",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "european-commission",
        "name": "European Commission",
        "role": "EU executive institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The EU executive, with responsibilities including enforcement of the Digital Services Act for very large online platforms.",
        "why": "It can turn a negotiated commitment into a binding requirement and retain approval powers even when a company pays for implementation.",
        "about": [
          "AliExpress nominates and pays a monitoring trustee under its June 2025 commitments; the Commission approves and supervises that role. Researcher access, priority treatment of trusted notices and public-data access are different legal mechanisms."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "EU",
          "DSA",
          "Digital Services Act"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings",
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 15
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The EU executive, with responsibilities including enforcement of the Digital Services Act for very large online platforms.",
        "structuralRole": "Public rulemaking, enforcement and programme funding",
        "significance": "The Commission appears in several capacities: developing policy, enforcing digital-service obligations, funding programmes and defining research-access arrangements. Those are separate instruments of public power, sometimes subject to consultation, review or legal challenge.",
        "background": [
          "AliExpress nominates and pays a monitoring trustee under its June 2025 commitments; the Commission approves and supervises that role. Researcher access, priority treatment of trusted notices and public-data access are different legal mechanisms."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A reported Kids Act draft, pending official text",
            "text": "Reuters reports age-tiered access checks and supervisory fees in an unpublished Commission draft. The Commission declined comment; its actual text was not obtained. These reported design choices are neither adopted duties nor an exercised enforcement power.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
                "url": "https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-age-eu-kids-draft"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "First cycle ends30September2025, first report due within2months; later cycles endSeptember2026/2027. Company copy may remove third-party confidential material. No actual receipt/report/response acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-trustreport"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must submit monitoring reports and promptly flag concluded failure",
            "sourceName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "targetName": "European Commission",
            "date": "C.9 prints impossible31November2027;recital16730November/C.12 two months.2026cycle not yet ended9September2026; no silent correction."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published adopted regulation assigns prerequisites, request formulation, access modalities and amendment/delivery records. No named project approval or60-day GDI proposal adoption inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-adoptprocedure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopted the project-specific research-access procedures",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July 2022 minutes record a Commission briefing to the WeProtect board and possible requests for assistance. Particular requests and resulting outputs are not established by this record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e169"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Briefed board on EU proposal",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "11–12 Jul 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Commission may reject/modify mandate and issue compliance instructions; replacement/discharge/hand-over governedC.7–8. No exercised instruction/replacement acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-mandate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves mandate and may instruct or replace the trustee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Article3 assigns hosting and workflow functions. The captured shell is not evidence the register has no rows or requires login for public overviews.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-portalhost"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
                "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must establish and host the portal",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Same decision and obligation family, not a second transfer or independent sanction. ExactSingaporeE-commercePrivateLimited name preserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bindsg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
            "date": "2025-06-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Actual18June2025Article71 act; access commitments settle covered proceedings without an Article40 infringement adjudication or admission.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bindnl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.",
            "date": "2025-06-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Authors propose guidance/codes and sustained public support. No adopted cure procedure, new grant or API right established by the paper.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-resourcesproposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocates guidance and support for researcher intermediaries",
            "sourceName": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "targetName": "European Commission",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.",
            "matched": [
              "European Commission"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b58bb2570b3161483e313c1a423a48db936a9fef1083e9a1c46c696598fd20fb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference",
            "heading": "What page 17 actually says",
            "text": "At paragraph76, PDF17 , Full Fact argues that the proposed definition is too narrowly directed at public safety. It asks to include public health and national security, aligning the definition with section 175 and comparing the EU Digital Services Act's crisis definition. It describes the existing Secretary of State route to Ofcom's media-literacy priorities or public statement notices. This is a scope-alignment argument using an existing power as a benchmark, not a newly drafted executive activation power.",
            "matched": [
              "Digital Services Act"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0c16d341d3788848cd5e16b6e7cc51692984a80d763370503032cea879db6363"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format",
            "text": "The proposal is sponsored by Safe Online and delivered by the Belgian nonprofit euCONSENT ASBL (cover and1.9, PDF3). It builds on an earlier European Commission-funded consortium project; do not backdate ASBL as the original 2021 grant recipient. The reported project-level funding purpose is established. The executed grant agreement, amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain unacquired; a separately encountered $2million figure belongs to a ten-project portfolio and is not assigned here.",
            "matched": [
              "European Commission"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "26aa02dd7a0a34606a6b0e5ecc14fab9bc15cde1b23904f60be02312032c3027"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
            "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
            "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal publication",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy"
          },
          {
            "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
            "url": "https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
            "title": "A binding access obligation is not a proven delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings",
            "title": "DSA research access: the decision-maker is identifiable; a GDI approval is not established"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The European Commission combines digital rulemaking, enforcement and research funding. It appears here through child-safety policy engagement, AI4TRUST funding, platform-data access procedures and binding AliExpress commitments overseen by a Commission-approved monitor paid by the company.",
          "structuralRole": "Public rules, funding and supervision of private compliance",
          "significance": "The Commission shows how public power can shape private infrastructure without operating it directly. It can establish duties, make company commitments binding and supervise a paid outside monitor, while also funding the research that informs digital-policy debates.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The European Commission occupies several different positions in this investigation. It participates in policy forums, funds research and exercises enforcement powers over major online services. These roles let it influence both the ideas available to policymakers and the practical conditions under which companies operate. Its WeProtect board participation is one route into child-safety discussion; its digital-service decisions carry a different, legally binding kind of authority.",
            "The AliExpress case provides a particularly clear view of that authority. In June 2025 the Commission made commitments binding on named Dutch and Singapore entities. The arrangement included a monitoring trustee nominated and paid by the company, whose mandate required Commission approval. The Commission approved Ankura Consulting (Europe) in September 2025 and retained powers to give instructions or require replacement. A private consultancy thus performs work within a publicly supervised compliance structure.",
            "The Commission also adopted procedures for project-specific researcher access under the Digital Services Act and was assigned responsibility for the data-access portal. Those arrangements define a route through which qualified researchers may obtain information from major platforms. Eligibility, the requested project and the access conditions matter because the resulting power is permission to inspect data that companies otherwise control.",
            "Research funding is another channel. The Commission's records list approximately €5.95 million for the AI4TRUST project, including €385,275 for its German GDI participant. Separately, it announced a €550 million AliExpress fine in July 2026 concerning illegal-product risks. Together these examples show an institution able to finance knowledge production, establish obligations and demand changes in company conduct. Its importance lies in that combination of resources and public authority.",
            "Reuters reports age-tiered access checks and supervisory fees in an unpublished Commission draft. The Commission declined comment; its actual text was not obtained. These reported design choices are neither adopted duties nor an exercised enforcement power."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
              "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
            },
            {
              "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
              "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
            },
            {
              "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
              "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
            },
            {
              "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
              "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
            },
            {
              "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
              "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
            },
            {
              "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
              "url": "https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "eu-csa-proposal",
      "label": "EU child-abuse legislation",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Proposed legislation discussed by WeProtect’s board in July 2022. No present enactment inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/eu-csa-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "eu-csa-proposal",
        "name": "EU child-abuse legislation",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Proposed legislation discussed by WeProtect’s board in July 2022. No present enactment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposed legislation discussed by WeProtect’s board in July 2022. No present enactment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject tracks the EU child-sexual-abuse legislative proposal as discussed in the retained 2022–23 advocacy records. It is the object of both WeProtect Secretariat support and rights/security objections, rather than a claim about the proposal's present legislative status.",
        "structuralRole": "Contested legislative vehicle connecting safety advocacy with rights and encryption concerns",
        "significance": "The proposal brought different organizations into conflict over the reach of detection and identification mechanisms. Comparing their actual statements reveals the policy disagreement, while dates and draft versions prevent an early submission being mistaken for a position on every later text.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Support, deployment and opposition",
            "text": "July 2022 WeProtect board minutes record plans for accessible advocacy material. A separate Secretariat submission supports detection obligations and safeguards while stating that it need not represent all members. WeProtect's accounts report targeted engagement and ECLAG-letter work following its 2023 survey. A September 2023 statement endorsed by Statewatch opposed agreement without stronger rights and security safeguards, objecting to broad scanning and potential identity requirements. These are different dated interventions, not a shared final vote.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e170",
              "n25",
              "w3-oak-e-eu-deployment",
              "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The2023 statement objects to EUCSA proposal provisions on broad scanning and potential identity requirements. Existing WeProtect Secretariat support concerns an undated earlier record with2022 membership figures; comparison is issue orientation across dates/drafts, not a common final vote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposed agreement without stronger rights/security safeguards",
            "sourceName": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Board discussion and Secretariat intention recorded in July 2022. Separate later records establish an actual published consultation and campaign participation; this minute alone does not establish delivery.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e170"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Planned accessible advocacy material",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "11–12 Jul 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WeProtect accounts p6 reports targeted government engagement and ECLAG-letter work after publication. No causal proof of changed law or Oak earmarking for this survey.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-eu-deployment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "used by WeProtect to support legislative advocacy",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "June 2023 onward"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The published submission supports detection obligations and safeguards. It expressly need not represent the membership's positions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Published supporting consultation",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "google",
      "label": "Google",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "WeProtect board participation; also represented in WEF digital-safety policy work.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/google",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "google",
        "name": "Google",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "WeProtect board participation; also represented in WEF digital-safety policy work.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "WeProtect board participation; also represented in WEF digital-safety policy work."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
            "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 11
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Google operates technology services that appear in this case as age-signal infrastructure, app distribution, payment services and search. It also participates in child-safety governance and technical collaborations, including WeProtect, WEF principles work, Altitude through Jigsaw and the ROOST initiative.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform operator combining policy participation with several distinct implementation powers",
        "significance": "Google's different services occupy different decision points: an age signal, app suspension, records disclosure and search-hash rollout are not interchangeable actions. The breadth of those roles explains why the company recurs across the map, while each relationship still needs its own service, date and evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation and reported action",
            "text": "Google publicly endorsed AB1043 in September 2025 and documents a Wallet route whose downstream signal can depend on earlier passport and face proofing. In separate San Francisco matters, counsel reports Google produced records on 6 June 2025, while July 2026 reporting quotes the company saying five identified apps were suspended. Its September 2025 StopNCII announcement described an intended rollout; the retained follow-up does not establish completion. Governance participation supplies context, rather than proof of a campaign-specific payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
                "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
                "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e171",
              "e184",
              "i14",
              "i21",
              "w25-sf-e-production-google",
              "w25-sf-e-google-response",
              "w28-access-e-google-rollout",
              "w26-ver-e-google-altitude",
              "w27-roost-e-google-founding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Google Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-google"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Google",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Google appears in the WEF principles working group and separately has WeProtect board representation. Neither relationship alone proves campaign funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e184"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named working-group participant",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "WEF digital-safety principles",
            "date": "2023-01-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e171"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Institutional board representation",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated announcement quotes Google; endorsement does not establish authorship of every provision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly endorsed",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Google announces gradual rollout beginning in coming days.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-google-announces"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
                "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces Canadian rollout",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "TAT announcement and reviews attribute co-development to Google Jigsaw and continuing advisory support. Existing Google identity reused with Jigsaw scope; no current unilateral repository veto, deployment or Canadian allocation inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-google-altitude"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as Jigsaw collaborator in Altitude development",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counsel says Google LLC produced records on6 June 2025 concerning ClothOff and Drawnudes. The declaration is primary sworn testimony about production; actual subpoena/production not acquired. No app, domain or payment shutdown implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-production-google"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "WIRED publishes Google’s account that five identified apps were suspended. This is a company statement connected to the SF intervention, not independent availability measurement or proof of bank/payment action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-google-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported five identified app suspensions through a spokesperson",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "date": "Reporting/update date; individual suspension dates unestablished."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification",
            "heading": "Methods and data boundaries",
            "text": "Document-version trap: search returned a cached June 23 variant of Discord's central page saying Google shares birthdate transiently with Discord and listing an Incode test. The live canonical August 10 page instead says age group + country and omits Incode. Use the live version for current claims; do not silently mix them or infer the engineering change/date from wording alone.",
            "matched": [
              "Google"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a7a34704fd6a0485d334d4cf14419d60112539db0b2b4c3328ff6561ac42dc0c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding",
            "heading": "Candidate relations and next decisive record",
            "text": "For integration, reuse the existing CCF, Columbia, Discord, OpenAI, Google, Roblox, Tech Coalition and other exact identities where they resolve. The meaningful new relationship types are incubation , advertised employer , named board/technical role , appoints , roadmap authority , merge/release authority , fundraising reported and collaboration/expertise reported . Avoid converting the entire roster into control edges. The Canadian edge remains a CCF award with an expected partnership purpose.",
            "matched": [
              "Google"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aaee25f15220827d8229322b0ddf0e13a19b689c526a02ac1345910ed987ac5b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead",
            "heading": "Findings and locators",
            "text": "The sworn declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom, not a Briver compliance certification. Paragraphs18–23 report subpoenas and responsive contact records from Cloudflare, Namecheap and former registrar Name.com. Paragraph29 reports Google's June6,2025 production. Paragraphs24–30 describe subsequent notices and correspondence. These are counsel's sworn accounts; actual subpoena and production instruments are not attached in this read scope. They establish a reported disclosure route, not provider shutdown instructions.",
            "matched": [
              "Google"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7878fddc21732ad99986d2606b8226e3f2791a1ca2403e282652226f11a27118"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Integration decision",
            "text": "Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "Google"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27dd58ed9cc6399f889b2b11bf77752b784fd2456fdcd75b84def91b6b0ea605"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
            "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
            "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          },
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
            "title": "San Francisco notices: the original remains a specific gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Google appears across this network as a platform operator, a supplier of identity-related infrastructure and a participant in safety-policy work. Its services can supply age information, control app distribution, disclose records to investigators and incorporate external safety assessments into search.",
          "structuralRole": "Operating several access points while contributing safety infrastructure",
          "significance": "Google's significance comes from the reach of its services. The same company can help develop a policy, supply technology for implementing it and operate a service affected by it, putting several consequential decisions within one corporate organization.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Google appears in several parts of this investigation because it operates services that other people and institutions depend on. Its roles include app distribution, search, payments and identity-related infrastructure. Each supplies a different practical capability, from determining what can be distributed to providing information a service uses to assess a user's age.",
            "Its Google Wallet documentation describes an ID-pass route involving passport and face checks before information is shared. Google also publicly endorsed California's age-assurance legislation in September 2025. These records place the company on both the implementation and policy sides of age assurance: it supplies a technical route and participates in the argument over what services should be expected to do.",
            "Its safety work has wider institutional connections. Google has WeProtect board representation and participated in the World Economic Forum's digital-safety principles group. Tech Against Terrorism credits Google Jigsaw with collaboration on Altitude, and ROOST names Google among its founding partners. These connections help circulate expertise and reusable tools across organizations.",
            "Government interaction is concrete too. A sworn declaration reports that Google produced records in June 2025 concerning services investigated by San Francisco. Separately, Google's September 2025 StopNCII announcement described a planned rollout for search; completion was not established in the retained follow-up. Its structural importance is this breadth: Google can supply evidence, implement policy and decide how information travels through services used at enormous scale."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
              "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
            },
            {
              "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
              "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
            },
            {
              "title": "WeProtect governance",
              "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
              "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
              "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "snap",
      "label": "Snap",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Representation on WeProtect’s published board; not an ownership share.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/snap",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "snap",
        "name": "Snap",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Representation on WeProtect’s published board; not an ownership share.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Representation on WeProtect’s published board; not an ownership share."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Snap is the platform company with representation on WeProtect's published board and a provider response describing use of StopNCII data on named Snapchat surfaces. The operational account covers 15 June–15 December 2024 and was reproduced by eSafety.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform participant translating a shared safety dataset into surface-specific controls",
        "significance": "Snap connects coalition governance with a concrete implementation account. The detail about surfaces and withdrawal states matters because use of a dataset is not necessarily uniform across a whole service: removal or exclusion logic can differ between public content areas and private communication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported implementation",
            "text": "eSafety's table summarizes Snap's daily updates and exclusion of Withdrawn or Deleted StopNCII entries for Spotlight, Discover and Stories. Its Chat row does not list StopNCII. This is a provider report about the stated period, rather than regulator runtime testing or a verified restoration trace. WeProtect board representation is a separate governance relationship and does not itself establish a campaign payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e172",
              "w28-access-e-snap-filtering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e172"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Institutional board representation",
            "sourceName": "Snap",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "eSafetyTable3summarizes Snap using StopNCII onSpotlight/Discover/Stories, excludingWithdrawn/Deleted;Chatrow does not list it. Provider response for15June–15December2024, not regulator runtime testing/current2026guarantee or paired restoration trace.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-snap-filtering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported daily updates and withdrawal-state exclusion on named surfaces",
            "sourceName": "Snap",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": "15 June–15 December2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "thorn",
      "label": "Thorn",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Representation on WeProtect’s published board; not an ownership share.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/thorn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "thorn",
        "name": "Thorn",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Representation on WeProtect’s published board; not an ownership share.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Representation on WeProtect’s published board; not an ownership share."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Thorn is a child-safety organization represented on WeProtect's published board and listed on ECLAG's steering group. The retained evidence establishes those institutional roles rather than a detailed account of its products, finances or individual decisions.",
        "structuralRole": "Organization linking alliance governance with European legislative advocacy coordination",
        "significance": "The two roles place Thorn in forums with different functions: an international alliance board and a group coordinating lawmaker-facing messages. They identify a route for participation across organizational settings without establishing that either forum directs all of Thorn's work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented positions",
            "text": "WeProtect's governance page records Thorn's board representation, and ECLAG's page lists it among steering members in September 2026. ECLAG says it formed in April 2022, but the observed roster is not automatically its founding roster. Neither listing supplies a campaign-specific grant, an ownership share or Thorn's vote on a particular proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e173",
              "n22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "Thorn",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e173"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect governance",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Institutional board representation",
            "sourceName": "Thorn",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "casir",
      "label": "CASIR · draft",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Unincorporated, unfinished proposed fund. Its site claims affiliations without reciprocal confirmation; no verified donor commitment or executed grant.",
      "aliases": [
        "CASIR · draft"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/casir",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "casir",
        "name": "CASIR · draft",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Unincorporated, unfinished proposed fund. Its site claims affiliations without reciprocal confirmation; no verified donor commitment or executed grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unincorporated, unfinished proposed fund. Its site claims affiliations without reciprocal confirmation; no verified donor commitment or executed grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "CASIR · draft"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft charter",
            "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": true,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CASIR appears as an unfinished proposal for an AI-risk funding scheme. Its website described affiliations and message-based grant conditions, but the retained research did not establish an incorporated fund, committed donors or executed grants. It belongs in the map as a proposed arrangement.",
        "structuralRole": "A proposed link between funding and campaign messaging",
        "significance": "Its interest lies in the advertised selection rule: funding would be directed toward particular organisations and a specified public message about extinction risk. That is a concrete design for influence, but it should not be counted as money already spent or as a functioning alliance.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the draft would have selected",
            "text": "The draft described explicit artificial-superintelligence extinction messaging, at least 65% of support directed to its member category, and possible review or recovery of unspent funds. It named ControlAI, Torchbearer, PauseAI US and Alliance for Secure AI Action in affiliation claims. Those claims came from CASIR’s own site; reciprocal acceptance and implementation were not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
                "url": "https://casir.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft governance",
                "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
              },
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft charter",
                "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e174",
              "e175",
              "e176",
              "e177",
              "e179"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% to its member category, and possible review/recovery of unspent funds. No executed grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e179"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft charter",
                "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Message-based grant criteria",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed eligibility and grant conditions for",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "Message-based grant criteria",
            "date": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e174"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
                "url": "https://casir.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft governance",
                "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claimed membership of",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Unfinished and unincorporated proposal. Affiliation is not reciprocally authenticated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e177"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
                "url": "https://casir.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claimed a partnership with",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft charter",
            "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "torchbearer",
      "label": "Torchbearer Community",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named by the CASIR draft site; affiliation is a site claim, not reciprocally authenticated.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/torchbearer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "torchbearer",
        "name": "Torchbearer Community",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named by the CASIR draft site; affiliation is a site claim, not reciprocally authenticated.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named by the CASIR draft site; affiliation is a site claim, not reciprocally authenticated."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named by the CASIR draft site; affiliation is a site claim, not reciprocally authenticated.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e175"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
                "url": "https://casir.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft governance",
                "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CASIR · draft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claimed membership of",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "Torchbearer Community",
            "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pauseai-us",
      "label": "PauseAI US",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named by CASIR’s unfinished site; no completed funding relationship established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pauseai-us",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pauseai-us",
        "name": "PauseAI US",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named by CASIR’s unfinished site; no completed funding relationship established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named by CASIR’s unfinished site; no completed funding relationship established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The US PauseAI organization, separately identified from the global Dutch foundation in the donor ledger.",
        "structuralRole": "US organizing and historical charitable support",
        "significance": "Separate organizational records prevent conflating national and global funding.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Three 2024 entries",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports $60,000 for PauseAI USA in three payments through Manifold for Charity. Global Stichting PauseAI has separate entries; do not substitute one entity’s accounts for the other.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports three July–August 2024 payments through Manifold for Charity for PauseAI USA totaling $60,000.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-pauseus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$60,000 across three 2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "PauseAI US",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e176"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
                "url": "https://casir.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft governance",
                "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CASIR · draft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claimed membership of",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "PauseAI US",
            "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
      "label": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named as a partner by CASIR’s unfinished site; not independently authenticated.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/alliance-secure-ai-action",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
        "name": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as a partner by CASIR’s unfinished site; not independently authenticated.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as a partner by CASIR’s unfinished site; not independently authenticated."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as a partner by CASIR’s unfinished site; not independently authenticated.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public listing schedules the assembly in Washington.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-scheduled"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advertises September 15 convening",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Unfinished and unincorporated proposal. Affiliation is not reciprocally authenticated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e177"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
                "url": "https://casir.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CASIR · draft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claimed a partnership with",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
            "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "asi-message-grants",
      "label": "Message-based grant criteria",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "CASIR draft: explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% member-category allocation and contemplated unspent-grant recovery. Proposed, not operational.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/asi-message-grants",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "asi-message-grants",
        "name": "Message-based grant criteria",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CASIR draft: explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% member-category allocation and contemplated unspent-grant recovery. Proposed, not operational.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CASIR draft: explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% member-category allocation and contemplated unspent-grant recovery. Proposed, not operational."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft charter",
            "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CASIR draft: explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% member-category allocation and contemplated unspent-grant recovery. Proposed, not operational.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CASIR says its grant committee would initially reflect ControlAI’s institutional plan. This is CASIR’s proposed design, not verified ControlAI direction of an operating fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e178"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft governance",
                "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "used its plan as a reference in the draft grant design",
            "sourceName": "Message-based grant criteria",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% to its member category, and possible review/recovery of unspent funds. No executed grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e179"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CASIR draft charter",
                "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CASIR · draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed eligibility and grant conditions for",
            "sourceName": "CASIR · draft",
            "targetName": "Message-based grant criteria",
            "date": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft charter",
            "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "longview",
      "label": "Longview Philanthropy",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Personnel links plus indexed historical Good Ventures awards. No recovered Longview-to-CAIS or Australian age-assurance financing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/longview",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "longview",
        "name": "Longview Philanthropy",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Personnel links plus indexed historical Good Ventures awards. No recovered Longview-to-CAIS or Australian age-assurance financing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Personnel links plus indexed historical Good Ventures awards. No recovered Longview-to-CAIS or Australian age-assurance financing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Longview Philanthropy advises and recommends philanthropic support, including for CeSIA and The Future Society. It appears as a recipient in historical Good Ventures grant data and as the employer of AI programme officer Aidan O’Gara in the September 2026 source read.",
        "structuralRole": "A funding adviser between major donors and policy organisations",
        "significance": "Recommendations can direct donors’ attention and resources without Longview itself being the legal grantor. That distinction is essential when following money through an advisory and onward-giving chain.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The funding evidence",
            "text": "Indexed first-party Good Ventures data records two January 2024 awards totalling USD595,426 and an October general-support award of USD15,162,840. Direct pages redirected or could not be reopened, so these remain indexed award records, not verified receipts. Effektiv Spenden reports support following Longview recommendations. CeSIA separately reported a two-year USD2 million recommendation dated 9 December 2025 and non-receipt at its statement time. Neither that recommendation nor O’Gara’s earlier CAIS affiliation establishes a Longview grant to CAIS or Australian age assurance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
                "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title"
              },
              {
                "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
                "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e180",
              "e185",
              "e186",
              "w8-red-e-longview-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-longview-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-longview-2m"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official team page read in the September 5 investigation; no grant to CAIS inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e180"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "AI Program Officer",
            "sourceName": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "targetName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "date": "Read 5 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-longview-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
            "sourceName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "H1/2024 allocation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Named among supporters over the years.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-longview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
            "sourceName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CeSIA reports Dec9,2025 recommendation and non-receipt at undated statement time. No payment, legal grantor, current outstanding balance or Red Lines restriction established. Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant recommendation; period: two years; start unspecified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-longview-2m"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "recipient reports two-year recommendation",
            "sourceName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "Recommendation dated9Dec2025; statement update undated"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Two recommended effective-giving information-sharing grants. Corroborated by an indexed first-party historical table; direct individual records redirected or could not be reopened. Not verified cash receipts or grant conditions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e185"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
                "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$595,426 indexed awards · Jan 2024",
            "sourceName": "Good Ventures",
            "targetName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "date": "January 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Exact figure $15,162,840 for general support. Corroborated by indexed first-party data; direct grant pages redirected and one table open failed. Not cash-receipt proof, not funding of Australian age assurance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e186"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
                "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$15.163m indexed award · Oct 2024",
            "sourceName": "Good Ventures",
            "targetName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "date": "October 2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest financial connection is a shared intermediary: Effektiv Spenden reports supporting both CeSIA and The Future Society after Longview Philanthropy recommendations. These are organizational funding records. A separate CeSIA solicitation explicitly budgets Red Lines diplomatic follow-through. No inspected record establishes a paid, campaign-restricted grant, the launch's total cost, or donor authority over its wording.",
            "matched": [
              "Longview Philanthropy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4917bf86923d5c70181ca4eff3649d3ab3e10e2b3a7dffb75faadc8f29a679c4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title"
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR funding update",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ogara",
      "label": "Aidan O’Gara",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Longview AI Program Officer in the prior source read, with CAIS affiliation on a 2023 paper.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ogara",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ogara",
        "name": "Aidan O’Gara",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Longview AI Program Officer in the prior source read, with CAIS affiliation on a 2023 paper.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Longview AI Program Officer in the prior source read, with CAIS affiliation on a 2023 paper."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Aidan O’Gara was listed as a Longview Philanthropy AI programme officer in the September 2026 source read. The 2023 AI Deception paper identifies an earlier CAIS affiliation and names him as a coauthor with Dan Hendrycks.",
        "structuralRole": "A personnel link between safety research and philanthropic advice",
        "significance": "O’Gara connects technical policy research to an organisation recommending funding. The chronology matters: a 2023 author affiliation describes that earlier setting, not an automatically current job or grant relationship between institutions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The research contribution",
            "text": "Section 4.2 of AI Deception discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures distinguishing AI-generated from human content. These are authentication proposals within a research paper. The record does not show O’Gara participating in Australian identity legislation, Longview funding CAIS or a regulator implementing the paper. The supported connection is a career and research pathway worth following through dated employment and grant records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "e180",
              "e181",
              "e182"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 4.2 discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures distinguishing AI and human content.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e182"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Deception paper",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor / origin-authentication proposals",
            "sourceName": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "targetName": "AI Deception paper",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Official team page read in the September 5 investigation; no grant to CAIS inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e180"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "AI Program Officer",
            "sourceName": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "targetName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "date": "Read 5 Sep 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical author affiliation, not a verified present job or funding relationship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e181"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Affiliation on 2023 paper",
            "sourceName": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-deception-paper",
      "label": "AI Deception paper",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "2023 paper discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures for AI/human-origin content. Not equivalent to universal government identity.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ai-deception-paper",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ai-deception-paper",
        "name": "AI Deception paper",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "2023 paper discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures for AI/human-origin content. Not equivalent to universal government identity.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2023 paper discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures for AI/human-origin content. Not equivalent to universal government identity."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2023 paper discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures for AI/human-origin content. Not equivalent to universal government identity.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named author on the 2023 AI Deception paper, alongside Aidan O’Gara. The recommendations do not establish participation in Australian identity policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e187"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Dan Hendrycks",
            "targetName": "AI Deception paper",
            "date": "2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 4.2 discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures distinguishing AI and human content.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "e182"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor / origin-authentication proposals",
            "sourceName": "Aidan O’Gara",
            "targetName": "AI Deception paper",
            "date": "2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "singh",
      "label": "Akshyae Singh",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Frame executive director. Describes founding it with Austin Chen and earlier CAIS creator campaigns.",
      "aliases": [
        "Akshyae Singh"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/singh",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "singh",
        "name": "Akshyae Singh",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Frame executive director. Describes founding it with Austin Chen and earlier CAIS creator campaigns.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Frame executive director. Describes founding it with Austin Chen and earlier CAIS creator campaigns."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Akshyae Singh"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Akshyae Singh is Frame Fellowship’s executive director. A firsthand retrospective describes starting Frame with Austin Chen and previously conducting creator events and campaigns with the Center for AI Safety after moving to San Francisco.",
        "structuralRole": "Creator-outreach experience carried into a fellowship",
        "significance": "Singh provides a direct experience link between earlier CAIS creator activity and Frame. This explains the programme’s development more clearly than a donor map alone: someone experienced in organising creators helped establish the fellowship.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the account supports",
            "text": "Frame’s team page supplies the executive-director role. Singh’s retrospective describes the earlier work and cofounding with Chen. It does not provide the earlier briefs, fees or editorial terms, so those campaigns cannot all be treated as commissioned scripts. The established sequence is organisational experience followed by a programme supporting creators and connecting them with opportunities.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              },
              {
                "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n01",
              "n02"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Named on Frame's official team page.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n01"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive director",
            "sourceName": "Akshyae Singh",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Singh describes conducting creator events/campaigns with CAIS after moving to San Francisco. Specific briefs, payments and editorial terms were not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n02"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Earlier creator campaigns reported",
            "sourceName": "Akshyae Singh",
            "targetName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "date": "Late 2025, retrospective 2026-06-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "One new Tallinn/Frame funding result",
            "text": "Frame's public grantmaking.ai profile has an organization-edited “Grants Received” block updated July 13, 2026 . It reports “Jaan Tallin (DAF)” $20,000 , AISTOF/Jueyan Zhang $280,000 , and another AISTOF entry with amount hidden. Preserve the donor spelling in source data; the intended Tallinn identity is strongly supported by context but the specific DAF is unnamed. Akshyae Singh's public reply says the $280,000 was for Cohort 1.0. The profile names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes Frame selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. These are recipient-side disclosures, not bank receipts, grant contracts, precise payment dates, or evidence of a donor selection veto. Do not infer the hidden amount or collapse the two AISTOF records into a known total.",
            "matched": [
              "Akshyae Singh",
              "Singh"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "67f40a90af1ff54e2e58f03b19b2cd0192df7fcf58c8a70f41926080eb6fa836"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "austin-chen",
      "label": "Austin Chen",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Manifund cofounder; Frame adviser and cofounding described by Singh. Specific roles do not establish control of every supported project.",
      "aliases": [
        "Austin Chen"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/austin-chen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "austin-chen",
        "name": "Austin Chen",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Manifund cofounder; Frame adviser and cofounding described by Singh. Specific roles do not establish control of every supported project.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Manifund cofounder; Frame adviser and cofounding described by Singh. Specific roles do not establish control of every supported project."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Austin Chen"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Austin Chen is a Manifund cofounder and listed Frame Fellowship adviser. Akshyae Singh’s firsthand account says they started Frame together, linking Chen to the fellowship’s formation and the grantmaking infrastructure around it.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme incubation connected to fiscal administration",
        "significance": "Chen’s roles help explain how a creator programme can be assembled within an existing support ecosystem. Cofounding a funding platform and advising a fellowship are distinct responsibilities; neither establishes control over every grant or creator’s work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented roles",
            "text": "Frame identifies Chen as adviser and names his Manifund role. Singh adds the cofounding account. The wider branch records Manifund funding to Mox and administration of grantmaking.ai, but these organisational functions should not become undocumented individual approval rights. The relevant further evidence is Frame’s governance and the agreements for particular awards.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              },
              {
                "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n03",
              "n04"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame identifies his Manifund role alongside his advisory role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n04"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Manifund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder listed",
            "sourceName": "Austin Chen",
            "targetName": "Manifund",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame lists Chen as adviser. Singh's firsthand retrospective says they started the fellowship together.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n03"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              },
              {
                "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Adviser; cofounding described",
            "sourceName": "Austin Chen",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08; retrospective 2026-06-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ryan-kidd",
      "label": "Ryan Kidd",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Frame adviser and MATS co-executive director; named initial grantmaking.ai reviewer.",
      "aliases": [
        "Ryan Kidd"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ryan-kidd",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ryan-kidd",
        "name": "Ryan Kidd",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Frame adviser and MATS co-executive director; named initial grantmaking.ai reviewer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Frame adviser and MATS co-executive director; named initial grantmaking.ai reviewer."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Ryan Kidd"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ryan Kidd is a listed Frame adviser, identified there as MATS co-executive director. Austin Chen’s grantmaking.ai announcement separately names him among its initial reviewers.",
        "structuralRole": "Expertise shared across a fellowship and funding review",
        "significance": "Kidd connects a creator-support programme with grant-application evaluation. Professional judgement and selection work can matter to resource allocation even without a donor or executive role in the funded project.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The two named functions",
            "text": "Frame’s team page records the advisory relationship and MATS role. Chen names Kidd, Gavin Leech and Marcus Abramovitch as initial grantmaking.ai reviewers. The announcement does not assign Kidd a particular application or show his decision on a Frame-related award. The supported overlap concerns expertise, not approval of every funded project.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              },
              {
                "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
                "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n05",
              "n14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame names Kidd, identifying his MATS co-executive director role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n05"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adviser listed",
            "sourceName": "Ryan Kidd",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Chen names Kidd, Gavin Leech and Marcus Abramovitch as initial reviewers. No specific application assignment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
                "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "grantmaking.ai",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Initial reviewer named",
            "sourceName": "Ryan Kidd",
            "targetName": "grantmaking.ai",
            "date": "2026-07-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "drew-spartz",
      "label": "Drew Spartz",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Frame adviser, creator and Nonlinear cofounder as listed by Frame.",
      "aliases": [
        "Drew Spartz"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/drew-spartz",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "drew-spartz",
        "name": "Drew Spartz",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Frame adviser, creator and Nonlinear cofounder as listed by Frame.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Frame adviser, creator and Nonlinear cofounder as listed by Frame."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Drew Spartz"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Drew Spartz is listed as a Frame Fellowship adviser. Frame identifies him as a creator and Nonlinear cofounder, placing creator and organisational experience within its advisory group.",
        "structuralRole": "Creator experience offered to a fellowship",
        "significance": "An adviser can contribute judgement, introductions or practical knowledge without controlling grants or editorial output. Spartz’s entry distinguishes the recorded advisory connection from management or funding.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The supported relationship",
            "text": "Frame’s team page names him as an adviser. It does not supply the role’s terms, a payment, an individual selection decision or authority over a fellow’s work. Participation in the advisory group is established; particular interventions would need correspondence or a specific account of advice given.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame names Spartz as adviser.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adviser listed",
            "sourceName": "Drew Spartz",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "manifund",
      "label": "Manifund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Grantmaking/fiscal infrastructure. Its published account identifies fiscal sponsorship and payouts for grantmaking.ai.",
      "aliases": [
        "Manifund"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/manifund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "manifund",
        "name": "Manifund",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Grantmaking/fiscal infrastructure. Its published account identifies fiscal sponsorship and payouts for grantmaking.ai.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Grantmaking/fiscal infrastructure. Its published account identifies fiscal sponsorship and payouts for grantmaking.ai."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Manifund"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Manifund provides grantmaking and fiscal infrastructure. Cofounder Austin Chen is also connected to Frame Fellowship, and project accounts identify Manifund as a source of Mox funding and the fiscal sponsor handling payouts for grantmaking.ai.",
        "structuralRole": "Infrastructure that receives, administers and distributes project funding",
        "significance": "Manifund sits between funding decisions and the practical ability to run a project. Administration explains how money reaches an incubator or grant round without making the administrator the originator or editorial controller of every output.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The specific routes",
            "text": "Mox’s approximate 2026 budget reports USD500,000 of historical Manifund grant funding. Chen’s 8 July announcement identifies Manifund’s fiscal-sponsorship and payout role for grantmaking.ai. Frame lists Chen’s cofounder role alongside his advisory involvement. The Mox total is not a Frame-specific grant. Fiscal administration should also be separated from the judgement of a round’s reviewers and the intentions of its original donors.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              },
              {
                "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
                "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n04",
              "n10",
              "n13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Frame identifies his Manifund role alongside his advisory role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n04"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame: mission and team",
                "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Austin Chen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cofounder listed",
            "sourceName": "Austin Chen",
            "targetName": "Manifund",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Mox's approximate budget identifies this historical grant-funding line. It is not a Frame-specific grant or audited cash receipt. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser Amount basis: recipient reported grant",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mox",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$500,000 grant funding reported",
            "sourceName": "Manifund",
            "targetName": "Mox",
            "date": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Chen's July 8 announcement identifies Manifund's administration role for the funding round.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
                "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "grantmaking.ai",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payouts",
            "sourceName": "Manifund",
            "targetName": "grantmaking.ai",
            "date": "2026-07-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "4. Direct donor database searches",
            "text": "Manifund results included grants to other organizations and creators mentioning ControlAI, e.g. Apart Research's collaboration and independent creator Tom Bibby's references to ControlAI. These were not counted as ControlAI receipts. No indirect route was turned into a direct funding claim.",
            "matched": [
              "Manifund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e8cfce4aaf7be8f85c2934f232896389c1decc6f4082063b76d1c11d041c5655"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "4. Direct donor database searches",
            "text": "Targeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "Manifund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a18b9ce4f409a2c7a0a5f8eac5cf78166d8ed67cad773f709ee7bc7cba0f337c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure",
            "heading": "Resources and the strategy they were intended to support",
            "text": "The same page reports a USD2million Longview recommendation dated9December2025, expressly unreceived when that passage was written. The update date is unknown. Manifund's displayed USD0 only describes that platform. We cannot turn either statement into a current total of CeSIA funding, an executed award, or a Red Lines-restricted grant. APCO is listed among proposed advisers/partners; a paid lobbying contract has not been acquired.",
            "matched": [
              "Manifund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1214bb3ea023715258d351ee0e6245d7f32289451268cc2f9cc799976c2e2be8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "The fund's Manifund account records $41,162 for Michaël Trazzi's SB-1047 documentary. The project's Donations tab dates the AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025 and marks the project Complete Grant. This establishes media financing; the proposal describes informing AI-policy discussions while presenting proponents and opponents. It does not trace Tallinn's November contribution into this production or establish editorial approval rights. The meaningful connection is fund-level support for communication, with grant-specific conditions still unknown.",
            "matched": [
              "Manifund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc517d083c8be5375a87b06775ae1f4847e9b62ce89dc1b68783e8ef14da915b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "grantmaking-ai",
      "label": "grantmaking.ai",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Public funding round. Reviewers, organizers and fiscal processor are distinct roles. No ControlAI award inferred.",
      "aliases": [
        "grantmaking.ai"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/grantmaking-ai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "grantmaking-ai",
        "name": "grantmaking.ai",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Public funding round. Reviewers, organizers and fiscal processor are distinct roles. No ControlAI award inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public funding round. Reviewers, organizers and fiscal processor are distinct roles. No ControlAI award inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "grantmaking.ai"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public funding round. Reviewers, organizers and fiscal processor are distinct roles. No ControlAI award inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Chen names Kidd, Gavin Leech and Marcus Abramovitch as initial reviewers. No specific application assignment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
                "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ryan Kidd",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Initial reviewer named",
            "sourceName": "Ryan Kidd",
            "targetName": "grantmaking.ai",
            "date": "2026-07-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Chen's July 8 announcement identifies Manifund's administration role for the funding round.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
                "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Manifund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payouts",
            "sourceName": "Manifund",
            "targetName": "grantmaking.ai",
            "date": "2026-07-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "2. Application, not an award",
            "text": "Fund's own platform record: https://app.grantmaking.ai/funds/4597b683-2776-4731-8598-627189912dc7 . Opened/read Grants Made list; no ControlAI grant shown. No actual award or paid amount established. Site-wide distributed totals are not ControlAI receipts.",
            "matched": [
              "grantmaking.ai"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "134b0eebff437edbd89c7197f6e0b374bb153ca6151e819352a39d065884eb85"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
            "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
            "heading": "2. Application, not an award",
            "text": "Source: https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f Opened/read. Platform-hosted organization and application record; the surrounding organizational summary is edited by grantmaking.ai and includes stale/conflated descriptions, so use the application and status fields narrowly.",
            "matched": [
              "grantmaking.ai"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "da0b41d247837c4e70e7d6ef9f96e474f4d8573333a2a534f2cc1f8ad840b749"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Money and the accounting boundary",
            "text": "On 20 April 2026 ControlAI proposed scaling to a $50m yearly budget, with scenarios reaching $500m or $1bn. Those are fundraising targets and hypothetical deployment scenarios, not receipts. Its July 13 2026 grantmaking.ai application asks for $50k minimum / up to $1m to expand G7 parliamentary outreach excluding the US. It is an application, not an award. Neither source discloses existing donors. No primary evidence of a ControlAI grant or gift from Jaan Tallinn, SFF, FLI, Open Philanthropy, a fiscal sponsor or a donor-advised fund was located. That is a record boundary, not evidence of absence.",
            "matched": [
              "grantmaking.ai"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f856a42931eee236b42ef42ef7ce4dfed96d6e42e645adfa42d030a85247e06d"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "One new Tallinn/Frame funding result",
            "text": "Frame's public grantmaking.ai profile has an organization-edited “Grants Received” block updated July 13, 2026 . It reports “Jaan Tallin (DAF)” $20,000 , AISTOF/Jueyan Zhang $280,000 , and another AISTOF entry with amount hidden. Preserve the donor spelling in source data; the intended Tallinn identity is strongly supported by context but the specific DAF is unnamed. Akshyae Singh's public reply says the $280,000 was for Cohort 1.0. The profile names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes Frame selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. These are recipient-side disclosures, not bank receipts, grant contracts, precise payment dates, or evidence of a donor selection veto. Do not infer the hidden amount or collapse the two AISTOF records into a known total.",
            "matched": [
              "grantmaking.ai"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "67f40a90af1ff54e2e58f03b19b2cd0192df7fcf58c8a70f41926080eb6fa836"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mozie",
      "label": "Mozie / Synapticks, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Creator recruitment vendor. Its own case study describes a Frame engagement; contract and fee not recovered.",
      "aliases": [
        "Mozie / Synapticks, Inc."
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mozie",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mozie",
        "name": "Mozie / Synapticks, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Creator recruitment vendor. Its own case study describes a Frame engagement; contract and fee not recovered.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Creator recruitment vendor. Its own case study describes a Frame engagement; contract and fee not recovered."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Mozie / Synapticks, Inc."
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Creator recruitment vendor. Its own case study describes a Frame engagement; contract and fee not recovered.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor describes targeted invitations for the second cohort. The fee and executed agreement are unavailable; vendor metrics are not independently audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n07"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
                "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Recruitment engagement reported",
            "sourceName": "Mozie / Synapticks, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Undated case study, observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "frame-selection",
      "label": "Frame selection committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Committee mentioned in Mozie's account. Membership and scoring rubric remain unidentified.",
      "aliases": [
        "Frame selection committee"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/frame-selection",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "frame-selection",
        "name": "Frame selection committee",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Committee mentioned in Mozie's account. Membership and scoring rubric remain unidentified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Committee mentioned in Mozie's account. Membership and scoring rubric remain unidentified."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Frame selection committee"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Committee mentioned in Mozie's account. Membership and scoring rubric remain unidentified.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mozie explicitly assigns acceptance decisions to Frame's committee. Committee names and rubric were not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n08"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
                "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Selection authority reported",
            "sourceName": "Frame selection committee",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Second cohort; observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mox",
      "label": "Mox",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "San Francisco AI-safety/EA workspace and incubator. Its fundraiser says Frame was developed in-house.",
      "aliases": [
        "Mox"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mox",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mox",
        "name": "Mox",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "San Francisco AI-safety/EA workspace and incubator. Its fundraiser says Frame was developed in-house.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "San Francisco AI-safety/EA workspace and incubator. Its fundraiser says Frame was developed in-house."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Mox"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mox is a San Francisco AI-safety and effective-altruism workspace and incubator. Its fundraiser describes shared space, events and operational support, and says the Frame Fellowship was developed in-house.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared infrastructure from which new programmes emerge",
        "significance": "Workspace, organisational support and proximity can make it easier to start a fellowship or campaign. Mox’s link to Frame explains a practical incubation route alongside the separate question of who paid for particular outputs.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The reported budget",
            "text": "The 2026 fundraiser lists USD500,000 of historical Manifund grant funding and a combined USD300,000 line for Craig Falls and the EA Infrastructure Fund. That combined amount must not be assigned in full to each donor. It also displays a USD20,000 SFF contribution reported through Manifund. The budget is a recipient account rather than audited cash evidence, and does not allocate a specific share of space or staff costs to Frame.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n09",
              "n10",
              "n11",
              "n12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fundraiser displays an SFF donation and Chen states Manifund received a speculation grant for Mox. This is a public transaction report, not a bank statement. Financial details: value: 20,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant receipt; period: Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date Amount basis: platform reported credit",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$20,000 for Mox via Manifund",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "Mox",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Mox's approximate budget identifies this historical grant-funding line. It is not a Frame-specific grant or audited cash receipt. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser Amount basis: recipient reported grant",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Manifund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$500,000 grant funding reported",
            "sourceName": "Manifund",
            "targetName": "Mox",
            "date": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Mox groups Craig Falls and EAIF under one grant total; do not assign $300,000 to each. Financial details: value: 300,000; currency: USD; kind: reported combined grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser Amount basis: recipient reported combined grant",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$300,000 combined funding reported",
            "sourceName": "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "targetName": "Mox",
            "date": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Mox's fundraiser describes Frame as developed in-house and outlines shared workspace/event/operational support. Exact Frame cost allocation is unavailable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n09"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "In-house incubation reported",
            "sourceName": "Mox",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Fundraiser created 2026-03-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "craig-eaif",
      "label": "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Grouped solely because Mox reports one combined $300,000 grant line; shares are not disaggregated.",
      "aliases": [
        "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/craig-eaif",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "craig-eaif",
        "name": "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Grouped solely because Mox reports one combined $300,000 grant line; shares are not disaggregated.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Grouped solely because Mox reports one combined $300,000 grant line; shares are not disaggregated."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Grouped solely because Mox reports one combined $300,000 grant line; shares are not disaggregated.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Mox groups Craig Falls and EAIF under one grant total; do not assign $300,000 to each. Financial details: value: 300,000; currency: USD; kind: reported combined grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser Amount basis: recipient reported combined grant",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mox",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$300,000 combined funding reported",
            "sourceName": "Craig Falls / EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "targetName": "Mox",
            "date": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "frame-amplifier",
      "label": "Frame Amplifier track",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Organizer's announced track to embed fellows in AI safety organizations. A programme offer is not proof every placement happened.",
      "aliases": [
        "Frame Amplifier track"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/frame-amplifier",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "frame-amplifier",
        "name": "Frame Amplifier track",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Organizer's announced track to embed fellows in AI safety organizations. A programme offer is not proof every placement happened.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Organizer's announced track to embed fellows in AI safety organizations. A programme offer is not proof every placement happened."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Frame Amplifier track"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Organizer's announced track to embed fellows in AI safety organizations. A programme offer is not proof every placement happened.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Singh offers to place promising fellows inside partner organizations to amplify their messages. Implementation and terms vary and are not established by the announcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced an embedded-creator track",
            "sourceName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "targetName": "Frame Amplifier track",
            "date": "2026-06-12 announcement"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "eclag",
      "label": "ECLAG",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "European Child Sexual Abuse Legislation Advocacy Group. Says it formed in April 2022 to align civil-society advocacy.",
      "aliases": [
        "ECLAG"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Coalition"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/eclag",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "eclag",
        "name": "ECLAG",
        "role": "Coalition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "European Child Sexual Abuse Legislation Advocacy Group. Says it formed in April 2022 to align civil-society advocacy.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "European Child Sexual Abuse Legislation Advocacy Group. Says it formed in April 2022 to align civil-society advocacy."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ECLAG"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ECLAG is the European Child Sexual Abuse Legislation Advocacy Group. It says it formed in April 2022 to align civil-society advocacy and is identified within the Child Safety ON campaign coalition. Its published steering roster provides a concrete view of participating organizations.",
        "structuralRole": "Coordination group producing shared lawmaker-facing advocacy",
        "significance": "The group offers a mechanism through which separate organizations can develop and carry common legislative messages. That is stronger evidence of coordination than appearing at the same event, while the steering roster by itself does not identify a campaign budget, funder instructions or agreement on every technical proposal.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Formation and steering",
            "text": "The observed roster lists ECPAT, Eurochild, Missing Children Europe, the Internet Watch Foundation, Terre des Hommes and Thorn. Its public account links the group to shared advocacy and the Child Safety ON campaign. These are the roles shown on the September 2026 pages; they should not automatically be treated as the exact April 2022 founding roster.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n16",
              "n17",
              "n18",
              "n19",
              "n20",
              "n21",
              "n22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECPAT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "ECPAT",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Campaign identifies ECLAG within its coalition; ECLAG supplies shared lawmaker-facing messages.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Child Safety ON",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Participating campaign coalition",
            "sourceName": "ECLAG",
            "targetName": "Child Safety ON",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "child-safety-on",
      "label": "Child Safety ON",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "EU child-safety legislation advocacy campaign; ECLAG is part of the coalition. Earlier branding: #ChildSafetyOnlineNow.",
      "aliases": [
        "Child Safety ON"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/child-safety-on",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "child-safety-on",
        "name": "Child Safety ON",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "EU child-safety legislation advocacy campaign; ECLAG is part of the coalition. Earlier branding: #ChildSafetyOnlineNow.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "EU child-safety legislation advocacy campaign; ECLAG is part of the coalition. Earlier branding: #ChildSafetyOnlineNow."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Child Safety ON"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "EU child-safety legislation advocacy campaign; ECLAG is part of the coalition. Earlier branding: #ChildSafetyOnlineNow.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "WeProtect's hub records launching #ChildSafetyOnlineNow with 13 other organizations; the current campaign uses Child Safety ON branding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Campaign launch recorded",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "Child Safety ON",
            "date": "Hub updated 2023-01-10; current campaign observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "5Rights appears among the campaign's supporter links. Support does not establish steering rights or funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "Child Safety ON",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Campaign identifies ECLAG within its coalition; ECLAG supplies shared lawmaker-facing messages.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Participating campaign coalition",
            "sourceName": "ECLAG",
            "targetName": "Child Safety ON",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ecpat",
      "label": "ECPAT",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
      "aliases": [
        "ECPAT"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ecpat",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ecpat",
        "name": "ECPAT",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ECPAT"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "ECPAT",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "eurochild",
      "label": "Eurochild",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
      "aliases": [
        "Eurochild"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/eurochild",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "eurochild",
        "name": "Eurochild",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Eurochild"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "Eurochild",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "missing-children-europe",
      "label": "Missing Children Europe",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
      "aliases": [
        "Missing Children Europe"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/missing-children-europe",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "missing-children-europe",
        "name": "Missing Children Europe",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Missing Children Europe"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "Missing Children Europe",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "iwf",
      "label": "Internet Watch Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
      "aliases": [
        "Internet Watch Foundation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/iwf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "iwf",
        "name": "Internet Watch Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Internet Watch Foundation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
            "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership benefits",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Internet Watch Foundation assesses online child sexual abuse material and supplies services such as maintained URL lists to members. It is also a UK Safer Internet Centre partner and a listed steering-group member of the European Child Sexual Abuse Legislation Advocacy Group.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational assessor whose findings feed funded services, industry systems and advocacy",
        "significance": "IWF connects frontline assessment with several downstream mechanisms: licensed lists, domain-removal cooperation and coalition work. Funding, assessment and enforcement are separate relationships here. An IWF list entry can inform another operator, but the receiving platform or registry still has its own decision and action process.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Services, funding and downstream use",
            "text": "IWF says its URLs are rechecked daily, obsolete entries removed the same day and lists updated twice daily. Its FY2025 accounts recognize £568,707 of Nominet-funded UKSIC income, £593,101 expenditure and a £24,394 unrestricted transfer. The membership directory lists DoubleVerify from 1 April 2025 in the over-£25,000 contribution band, without an exact receipt. Nominet separately attributes one IWF request in each of two later reporting periods; a request alone does not prove a completed suspension.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
                "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF membership benefits",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
              "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-recognition",
              "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
              "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band",
              "w29-enf-e-iwf-reported-requests",
              "n20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
              "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
              "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
              "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IWF reports GBP 568,707 UKSIC fund income, GBP 593,101 expenditure and GBP 24,394 transfer from unrestricted funds; opening/closing balances are zero. Note18c expressly says the grant comes from Nominet and states no unfulfilled conditions relating to amounts recognized that year. This positive recognition assertion is narrower than acceptance of every programme deliverable or proof of bank cash. Financial details: value: 568,707; currency: GBP; kind: IWF recognized Nominet UKSIC fund income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-recognition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was explicitly named as funder of the UKSIC Hotline grant",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The recruitment pack specifies a role handling IWF grant obligations. Metadata is dated 20 January 2022 and applications close 11 February 2022; neither proves exact publication date or that a person filled the role. Generic new-application approval by the Deputy CEO must not become a bespoke Nominet right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-iwf-recruitment-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a grant-management and reporting job specification",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
            "date": "Early-2022 recruitment context; no continuing staffing arrangement established."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Membership pages describe licensed dynamic lists/alerts, analyst contact, research, policy participation and publicity. No executed SLA, raw-list redistribution entitlement or proof DV used all benefits acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-member-resources"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF membership benefits",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes licensed lists, expertise and participation benefits",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Current pricing describes sector/size-based annual GBP fees from£5,000+ to£100,000+ supporting frontline work. This is general current pricing, not the2025DV tariff or proof of a particular cash payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-fee-framework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "support services under stated annual fee framework",
            "sourceName": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IWF places DV in Members contributing over£25,000. No exact amount, upper bound, payment date, invoice period or reconciled receipt is established; do not manufacture an annual2025payment by combining the current fee page. Payment status: band reported by recipient; receipt unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed in contribution band overGBP25000",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Nominet reports one IWF request in2022-11-01–2023-10-31 and one in2023-11-01–2024-10-31, compared with zero2019-11-01–2020-10-31. A request is not proved completed suspension, unique underlying content or causal grant outcome.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-iwf-reported-requests"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed one request in each selected later period",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "IWF says URLs are rechecked daily, removed the same day when relevant content is absent, with twice-daily list updates. This is upstream maintenance evidence, not observed DV reclassification or restored placements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removal",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "date": "2025report section; publication date unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
            "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership benefits",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
            "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
            "title": "Nominet exercised domain action: reported requests and reversals"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Internet Watch Foundation assesses child sexual abuse material and supplies information used by internet businesses. Its place in this investigation spans licensed lists, domain-removal cooperation, industry membership and funded hotline work within the UK Safer Internet Centre.",
          "structuralRole": "Assessing material and supplying reusable evidence to intermediaries",
          "significance": "IWF matters because an assessment made in one institution can travel into another company's systems. Its lists, membership services and cooperation with a domain registry connect frontline review with decisions affecting hosting, access and advertising.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Internet Watch Foundation assesses online child sexual abuse material and provides services that other organizations can use in their own safety work. Its role includes maintaining assessed URL information, supplying licensed lists and alerts, and giving members access to analyst expertise. That makes its judgments an important input to companies that must decide what to host, distribute or monetize.",
            "Its published procedures describe active maintenance of those inputs. IWF says listed URLs are checked daily and removed the same day when the relevant content is absent, with list updates twice a day. This is important to anyone trying to understand how a classification can change after the underlying material changes. A current reference list is one part of the process; companies consuming it have their own update and action procedures.",
            "Membership supplies both resources and organizational connections. Published fees vary by sector and size, and member benefits include technical services, research and policy participation. DoubleVerify is listed as a member from April 2025 and appears in a contribution band above £25,000. IWF's 2025 report describes a board combining independent and industry trustees. These arrangements place assessment expertise, commercial use and institutional governance alongside one another.",
            "IWF also participates in the UK Safer Internet Centre and reported £568,707 of Nominet-funded hotline income for the year ending March 2025. Its cooperation with Nominet on removal predates that grant programme. Together these relationships explain why IWF is more than another advocacy name on the map: it helps produce the reference information that can enter real decisions about online access and commercial support."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
              "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
            },
            {
              "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
              "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
            },
            {
              "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
              "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
            },
            {
              "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
              "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
              "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "terre-des-hommes",
      "label": "Terre des Hommes",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
      "aliases": [
        "Terre des Hommes"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/terre-des-hommes",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "terre-des-hommes",
        "name": "Terre des Hommes",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Terre des Hommes"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed on ECLAG's current steering group. This source does not establish a campaign grant.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n21"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
                "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ECLAG",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering-group member listed",
            "sourceName": "Terre des Hommes",
            "targetName": "ECLAG",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wp-secretariat",
      "label": "WeProtect Secretariat",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Its published EU submission expressly need not represent all Alliance members; its membership figures are dated 12 September 2022.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect Secretariat"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wp-secretariat",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wp-secretariat",
        "name": "WeProtect Secretariat",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Its published EU submission expressly need not represent all Alliance members; its membership figures are dated 12 September 2022.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Its published EU submission expressly need not represent all Alliance members; its membership figures are dated 12 September 2022."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect Secretariat"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Its published EU submission expressly need not represent all Alliance members; its membership figures are dated 12 September 2022.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Secretariat supports client-side, homomorphic and secure-enclave approaches while requiring more testing. Does not necessarily represent members.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-wp-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocates detection options in submission to",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "targetName": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
            "date": "January 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The published submission supports detection obligations and safeguards. It expressly need not represent the membership's positions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Published supporting consultation",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Submission identifies the Secretariat as the authoring constituency; membership is not blanket endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Alliance Secretariat; authorship scope stated",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "date": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wp-ed",
      "label": "WeProtect executive director role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Financial authority in the 2023–25 Policy Plan. Role-level record; no historical occupant backfilled.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect executive director role"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wp-ed",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wp-ed",
        "name": "WeProtect executive director role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Financial authority in the 2023–25 Policy Plan. Role-level record; no historical occupant backfilled.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Financial authority in the 2023–25 Policy Plan. Role-level record; no historical occupant backfilled."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect executive director role"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Financial authority in the 2023–25 Policy Plan. Role-level record; no historical occupant backfilled.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Role allocation in Policy Plan; no inference about an unobserved specific expenditure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n28"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect operations role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Authority over financial management",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect executive director role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect operations role",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Executive director accountability stated in Policy Plan.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n30"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect executive director role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wp-coo",
      "label": "WeProtect operations role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "COO expenditure/asset management responsibility described in the 2023–25 Policy Plan.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect operations role"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wp-coo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wp-coo",
        "name": "WeProtect operations role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "COO expenditure/asset management responsibility described in the 2023–25 Policy Plan.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "COO expenditure/asset management responsibility described in the 2023–25 Policy Plan."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect operations role"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "COO expenditure/asset management responsibility described in the 2023–25 Policy Plan.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy Plan assigns financial management to the COO under the executive director's authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Manages expenditure and assets",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect operations role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Role allocation in Policy Plan; no inference about an unobserved specific expenditure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n28"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect executive director role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Authority over financial management",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect executive director role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect operations role",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Financial accountability relation stated in Policy Plan.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect operations role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wp-frac",
      "label": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "FRAC accountability function described in the Policy Plan.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wp-frac",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wp-frac",
        "name": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "FRAC accountability function described in the Policy Plan.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FRAC accountability function described in the Policy Plan."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FRAC accountability function described in the Policy Plan.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FRAC reports to the Stichting Management Board and Policy Board.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n31"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect management / policy boards",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports to both boards",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "targetName": "WeProtect management / policy boards",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Financial accountability relation stated in Policy Plan.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect operations role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect operations role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Executive director accountability stated in Policy Plan.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n30"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect executive director role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect executive director role",
            "targetName": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wp-boards",
      "label": "WeProtect management / policy boards",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Two distinct boards grouped for the Policy Plan's common reporting endpoint; neither is the Secretariat.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect management / policy boards"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wp-boards",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wp-boards",
        "name": "WeProtect management / policy boards",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Two distinct boards grouped for the Policy Plan's common reporting endpoint; neither is the Secretariat.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Two distinct boards grouped for the Policy Plan's common reporting endpoint; neither is the Secretariat."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect management / policy boards"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Two distinct boards grouped for the Policy Plan's common reporting endpoint; neither is the Secretariat.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FRAC reports to the Stichting Management Board and Policy Board.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n31"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports to both boards",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect finance/risk/audit committee",
            "targetName": "WeProtect management / policy boards",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wp-development",
      "label": "WeProtect Development Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Unpaid fundraising advisory/support body disclosed in its Policy Plan.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect Development Committee"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wp-development",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wp-development",
        "name": "WeProtect Development Committee",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Unpaid fundraising advisory/support body disclosed in its Policy Plan.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unpaid fundraising advisory/support body disclosed in its Policy Plan."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect Development Committee"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Unpaid fundraising advisory/support body disclosed in its Policy Plan.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Policy Plan discloses an unpaid Development Committee and dedicated fundraising function established in 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n32"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fundraising advice and support",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Development Committee",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "five-country-working-group",
      "label": "Five Country Working Group",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Voluntary child-protection principles discussed with WeProtect in June 2024. Not an inferred covert actor.",
      "aliases": [
        "Five Country Working Group"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/five-country-working-group",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "five-country-working-group",
        "name": "Five Country Working Group",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Voluntary child-protection principles discussed with WeProtect in June 2024. Not an inferred covert actor.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Voluntary child-protection principles discussed with WeProtect in June 2024. Not an inferred covert actor."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Five Country Working Group"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Voluntary child-protection principles discussed with WeProtect in June 2024. Not an inferred covert actor.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WeProtect's minutes describe Five Country Working Group principles through a Home Office presentation; no separate direct Working Group-to-WeProtect interaction is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n34"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Subject of Home Office briefing",
            "sourceName": "Five Country Working Group",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "June 2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "pa-consulting",
      "label": "PA Consulting",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Natalia Greene briefed WeProtect's board on the Global Threat Assessment in June 2023.",
      "aliases": [
        "PA Consulting"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/pa-consulting",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "pa-consulting",
        "name": "PA Consulting",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Natalia Greene briefed WeProtect's board on the Global Threat Assessment in June 2023.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Natalia Greene briefed WeProtect's board on the Global Threat Assessment in June 2023."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "PA Consulting"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PA Consulting is a professional-services firm represented here through government programme evaluation and a WeProtect research briefing. The Online Safety Data Initiative named it as external evaluator in September 2021; WeProtect's June 2023 minutes record Natalia Greene of PA briefing its board on a forthcoming Global Threat Assessment.",
        "structuralRole": "External programme-assurance provider and research contributor",
        "significance": "PA's role distinguishes assurance of a programme's process and resources from the product-evaluation work performed by other participants. That separation helps readers locate responsibility: an evaluator appointment does not by itself validate a supplier's prototype or establish that a final assessment accepted every result.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope of the documented work",
            "text": "The 2021 government account describes assurance of process, resources, spending and quality, with reporting to senior civil servants. It says priorities and responsibilities were agreed with PA in collaboration with Faculty and PUBLIC. The retained corpus does not contain PA's original agreed scope or final OSDI assessment. The 2023 WeProtect minute records a progress briefing, rather than a commissioning contract or completed report.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
              "w33-con-e-jointscope",
              "n35"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Natalia Greene of PA Consulting briefed WeProtect's board on progress of the next Global Threat Assessment. A completed report or commissioning contract is not established by this minute.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n35"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Threat Assessment",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research briefing recorded",
            "sourceName": "PA Consulting",
            "targetName": "Global Threat Assessment",
            "date": "June 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "23September2021deliverylead account describes assurance of process/resources/spending/quality andseniorcivilservantreporting. No originalscopeagreement/finalassessment acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paevaluate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appointed PA as external OSDI evaluator",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "PA Consulting",
            "date": "2021-09-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Governmentaccount saysDCMS agreedwithPA incollaborationwithFaculty/PUBLIC. This is described processagreement, not unilateral supplierapproval or acquiredcontract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-jointscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "had responsibilities and priorities agreed with government and consortium",
            "sourceName": "PA Consulting",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "No PA Consulting OSDI final assessment, inception report, detailed agreed evaluation scope, or original OSDI product-evaluation framework was located in this pass. This is a search-coverage result, not evidence that evaluation did not occur. The public record found does include a later, substantive technical evaluation that expressly attributes part of its approach to OSDI. That supplies a documented methodological reuse route while leaving the original OSDI assessment gap intact.",
            "matched": [
              "PA Consulting"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "eda708e9ab6b99f3472f7abfa7824f175181df6dbb4f54ae9016fcdefa357467"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass",
            "heading": "Search coverage and discriminating next record",
            "text": "Queries used: \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"PA Consulting\" evaluation report ; \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"evaluation framework\" ; site:gov.uk \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" evaluation results ; \"OSDI\" \"evaluation\" \"PA Consulting\" report ; and \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"evaluation\" \"final\" report . These returned the evaluator announcement, programme planning/longlist material, the retained supplier service definition, sector/data reviews and the STCF2 report. Search-result references to other work do not establish that work was read. Root owns the newer Data Landscape Review; no parallel reread or new branch was started here.",
            "matched": [
              "PA Consulting"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "37d16f5570b68c857c019213875538fa2d613670412fd93904a0430b9b5dd706"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
            "heading": "A delivered prototype is claimed, but production performance is not established",
            "text": "The separate evaluation-output note distinguishes PA Consulting's programme-assurance role from PUBLIC's product-evaluation role. It also identifies a later PUBLIC-authored STCF2 report explicitly reusing OSDI practices, with self-reporting and testing limitations. No original PA final assessment or original OSDI framework was located in that bounded search.",
            "matched": [
              "PA Consulting"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3d8a4d8c165e41df735197f0b337540e3ada53be76088815cf6ea634ff1e780e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Policy travels through documents and decisions",
            "text": "OSDI had a CDEI-convened advisory group, PA Consulting programme evaluation and supplier participation by Faculty and PUBLIC. These are distinct roles. PUBLIC's account of a TRL4 sandbox describes prototype work; its later STCF2 assessment explicitly credits OSDI practices while retaining limited testing and supplier-reported performance. PUBLIC's claim to have contributed to CDDP does not identify it in a redacted subcontract list. Its current website-controller legal identity is not proof of the historical contracting party. The record now connects programmes, methods and personnel more clearly while preserving the missing agreements and acceptance decisions. A24",
            "matched": [
              "PA Consulting"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "42676dfc85a23c922a6fd5a6e27eb77159293db4f7b3bbd84ef97ebbc122ef6f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "global-threat-assessment",
      "label": "Global Threat Assessment",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "WeProtect research output. Board comments establish a production interface, not dictated findings.",
      "aliases": [
        "Global Threat Assessment"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Artifact"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/global-threat-assessment",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "global-threat-assessment",
        "name": "Global Threat Assessment",
        "role": "Artifact",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "WeProtect research output. Board comments establish a production interface, not dictated findings.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "WeProtect research output. Board comments establish a production interface, not dictated findings."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Global Threat Assessment"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WeProtect research output. Board comments establish a production interface, not dictated findings.",
        "structuralRole": "Artifact",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Natalia Greene of PA Consulting briefed WeProtect's board on progress of the next Global Threat Assessment. A completed report or commissioning contract is not established by this minute.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n35"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PA Consulting",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research briefing recorded",
            "sourceName": "PA Consulting",
            "targetName": "Global Threat Assessment",
            "date": "June 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minutes record comments on coverage, categories and safeguarding. A feedback interface does not prove findings were dictated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n36"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board feedback on scope recorded",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "Global Threat Assessment",
            "date": "June 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "stripe",
      "label": "Stripe",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A payment provider used by online businesses, including itch.io, with its own rules for merchant eligibility and risk.",
      "aliases": [
        "payments",
        "games"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Payment-services provider"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/stripe",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "stripe",
        "name": "Stripe",
        "role": "Payment-services provider",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "A payment provider used by online businesses, including itch.io, with its own rules for merchant eligibility and risk.",
        "why": "It is one of the institutions that can turn an upstream assessment or bank concern into a practical restriction on commerce.",
        "about": [
          "Stripe’s published MATCH practice generally disqualifies listed businesses, with possible exceptions. Mastercard’s rules allow onboarding after inquiry. This difference reveals additional discretion at the processor level.",
          "For the 2025 games dispute, itch.io relayed a Stripe explanation referring to banking-partner restrictions. The investigation has not identified those banks from the original instruction."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "payments",
          "games"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A payment provider used by online businesses, including itch.io, with its own rules for merchant eligibility and risk.",
        "structuralRole": "A payment provider making merchant-risk decisions",
        "significance": "Stripe sits where network screening information becomes a provider’s decision about merchant access. Its own rules and discretion matter alongside the upstream card-network systems it uses.",
        "background": [
          "Stripe’s published MATCH practice generally disqualifies listed businesses, with possible exceptions. Mastercard’s rules allow onboarding after inquiry. This difference reveals additional discretion at the processor level.",
          "For the 2025 games dispute, itch.io relayed a Stripe explanation referring to banking-partner restrictions. The investigation has not identified those banks from the original instruction."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stripe generally disqualifies MATCH-listed merchants but will consider documented exceptional circumstances such as identity theft. Consideration does not promise approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-stripe-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes general disqualification with exceptions",
            "sourceName": "Stripe",
            "targetName": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "itch says Stripe asked it to convey that banking partners constrained sexually explicit content despite card-network support for appropriately registered adult content. Bank identity and original instruction missing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n37"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe banking partners · unidentified",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Bank restriction relayed by itch",
            "sourceName": "Stripe banking partners · unidentified",
            "targetName": "Stripe",
            "date": "July 31, 2025 post; subsequently edited"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The card route is a limited Discord test and an independently documented k-ID method; a refund does not establish deletion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "k-ID verification methods",
                "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "k-ID",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "routes credit-card verification through",
            "sourceName": "k-ID",
            "targetName": "Stripe",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "itch identifies Stripe as its card processor and reports a sexual-gratification content definition and payment suspension.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n38"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              },
              {
                "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Adult-content payment restriction reported",
            "sourceName": "Stripe",
            "targetName": "itch.io",
            "date": "July 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
            "title": "Stripe implementation — MATCH screening and processing access",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. The public implementation counterpart establishes a substantial onward effect: Stripe generally declines MATCH-listed merchants while reserving consideration for documented exceptional circumstances. This is evidence of one provider's published practice. It does not establish a Mastercard rule that every provider must reject every listed business, or loss of access to all banking.",
            "matched": [
              "Stripe"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dd2a7ac25f12c4967aa2454d914c9be977e53d36d644c0cc8e3c5bc6b1cd2443"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
            "title": "Stripe implementation — MATCH screening and processing access",
            "heading": "Comparison with the current network instrument",
            "text": "The summaries also differ. Section 11.5, page 151, specifies five calendar days under its enumerated termination/awareness triggers, versus Stripe's one working day. Table 11.4, page 157, uses previous-three-month language and a 1.5% threshold for code 04, versus Stripe's monthly 1%; its code 05 period also differs. The manual's awkward period wording is not reconstructed into a new formula here. Section 11.13, pages 155–156, places removal with Mastercard and allows the merchant itself to request removal for cured PCI noncompliance if the acquirer is unwilling or unable, following the stated proof process. That alternative is absent from Stripe's opening acquirer-only summary.",
            "matched": [
              "Stripe"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27d78d240ae951c22728f4277435b52208dd65f2a705afcbb875e6cf8986de36"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
            "heading": "What is new",
            "text": "This permits a Steam-specific attributed chain without importing Stripe's itch role. The processors remain unnamed. The existing graph node “Payment-letter addressees” is not their identity. Mastercard's denial and the June 3, 2025 rulebook remain separate retained records. The apparent disagreement could concern who communicated, what was requested, or downstream interpretation of a broad rule; it cannot be resolved by treating either public statement as the missing instruction.",
            "matched": [
              "Stripe"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dd270ddec0395335607f4a1ace9abee8bbf70e8023636b9706368b20dc6789f7"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification",
            "heading": "Structural implications and unresolved checks",
            "text": "Unknown: September account-by-account rollout coverage; Discord-specific Stripe retention and metadata linkage; implemented Wallet disclosure at the time of an individual test; audit proof of deletion/isolation; precise resolution of the 5CA disagreement. Neither a data-sale motive nor a common NGO/funder directing these Discord changes is established by these records. Discord/k-ID expressly deny selling the relevant user data; those are policy representations, not a forensic audit.",
            "matched": [
              "Stripe"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8c61d5fac4d571dcfcd7f44c57d22d48e71bdca159cbab3c84a8fe99be1ed416"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
            "title": "Stripe implementation — MATCH screening and processing access"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Stripe is a payment provider whose eligibility decisions can determine whether an online business can accept money. Its role in this investigation includes itch.io's reported adult-content restrictions and the use of shared merchant-risk records that can affect a business beyond one transaction.",
          "structuralRole": "Merchant-facing decisions translating financial risk into payment access",
          "significance": "Stripe is where upstream restrictions become a practical experience for a platform or seller. Its own acceptance policies matter alongside bank and card-network requirements, so identifying who actually refuses service is essential to understanding the outcome.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Stripe supplies payment services to online businesses and makes decisions about which merchants and activities it will support. That places it close to the point where a broad financial policy becomes a concrete problem for a platform: a product category can no longer be sold, a payment method disappears, or a seller must find another way to receive money.",
            "The itch.io case makes this role visible. The platform identified Stripe as its card processor and reported a restriction on content intended for sexual gratification. It also said Stripe asked it to convey that banking partners constrained sexually explicit content even though card-network rules could accommodate appropriately registered adult businesses. The account provides a view of the message received by the platform. The underlying banks and original instruction were not identified in the material obtained.",
            "Stripe also publishes its approach to Mastercard's MATCH database. Its general practice is to disqualify listed merchants, while considering exceptional circumstances supported by documentation, such as identity theft. That is a provider policy applied to information maintained elsewhere. The practical effect can persist beyond the initial business relationship because a later processor may encounter the same risk record during its own screening.",
            "The company's position is therefore more consequential than simply passing transactions along. It assesses eligibility, interprets restrictions and communicates the resulting conditions to customers. For creators and small platforms, those decisions can alter what is economically possible even without a new law aimed at their work. The useful trail runs through the actual restriction, the bank or network condition invoked, and the provider's own policy on exceptions and reconsideration."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
              "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
            },
            {
              "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
              "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
            },
            {
              "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
              "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "paypal",
      "label": "PayPal",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named itch.io payment/payout dependency. No recovered incident-specific PayPal order.",
      "aliases": [
        "PayPal"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/paypal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "paypal",
        "name": "PayPal",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Named itch.io payment/payout dependency. No recovered incident-specific PayPal order.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named itch.io payment/payout dependency. No recovered incident-specific PayPal order."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "PayPal"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PayPal is a payments provider appearing in several separate relationships: a reported itch.io payout dependency, an ICMEC supporter, a Lantern financial-pilot participant and a named provider in WIPO's ALERT-PAY programme description. Its own infringement policy also invites rights-owner reports and permits appropriate action.",
        "structuralRole": "Payment provider connecting platform access, safety partnerships and infringement-reporting processes",
        "significance": "PayPal's importance lies in its operational position: loss of its service can affect a platform's ability to pay creators or receive money. Safety-programme participation and external requests may supply information or pressure, but they do not automatically identify the basis for a particular account decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Several routes, no single inferred instruction",
            "text": "itch.io's 28 July 2025 addendum names PayPal among current processors and explains its payout importance; no incident-specific PayPal restriction order was recovered. The Tech Coalition separately names PayPal in its financial pilot. An August 2025 attorneys-general letter asks it to act against sellers of deepfake nonconsensual intimate-image tools or content under existing policies. WIPO's June 2026 presentation names PayPal but does not identify the two historical pilot providers. Its posted infringement paragraphs specify no ALERT-PAY-specific automatic termination or fixed appeal clock.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n39",
              "i03",
              "w1-icmec-e-paypal",
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-paypal",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-paypal",
              "w30-class-e-pay-named-paypal",
              "w30-class-e-paypal-referral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "How the revised US agreement channels disputes",
            "text": "The US agreement reaches its stated September 14 effective date. JAMS replaces AAA, and coordinated similar disputes face staged arbitration, holdbacks and mediation, with tolling and later routes to court or further arbitration. The agreement claims application to earlier disputes. Its initial-account opt-out and small-claims provisions remain; this does not reopen a universal opt-out today. These are contractual terms, not a finding of judicial enforceability or measured delay.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September 14",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September 14,2026",
                "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-fin-paypal-dispute"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Reported participation in UK payments formation",
            "text": "Sky names PayPal among early PDC participants. Its September 14 financing story describes a planned approximately £50m setup equity solicitation, not closed funding. No participant-specific contribution, equity percentage or voting right was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              },
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-paypal-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-pdc"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to PayPal legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "PayPal",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "UK15July2026 and US6May2021 paragraphs invite rights-owner reports and permit appropriate action where needed. They disclose no ALERT-PAY-specific deadline, automatic termination or appeal clock; locale entities do not identify the pilot contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-paypal-referral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "invites infringement reports and may take appropriate action",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The June 29 notice identifies September 14 commencement; the linked dated agreement uses JAMS and staged mass arbitration, while claiming to supersede prior arbitration agreements for earlier disputes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September 14",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September 14,2026",
                "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal US dispute-resolution terms — September 14",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Sets US dispute terms effective September 14",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "PayPal US dispute-resolution terms — September 14",
            "date": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "WIPO slide4 names this provider in the programme description. Slide7 does not identify either historical pilot PSP; no provider-executed agreement acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-named-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "names provider in programme description",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "PayPal",
            "date": "June2026 presentation; posted16June2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "itch explains why losing PayPal would threaten payouts across its platform. This is not a recovered PayPal takedown order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n39"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
                "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Platform payout dependency reported",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "itch.io",
            "date": "2025-07-28 addendum"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Operator identifies PayPal among six; no connection to prior itch.io restrictions established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named as pilot participant",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i03"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sky names PayPal among firms involved in early PDC work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-paypal-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported early participation",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights",
            "heading": "PayPal: a short reporting policy, with distinct locale dates",
            "text": "These short pages do not state a fixed action deadline, evidential adjudication procedure, counter-notice timetable, automatic account termination or ALERT-PAY-specific correction rule. The blank report and broader account contracts were not opened. Absence from this paragraph is not absence of wider PayPal remedies. The different update dates cannot be treated as dates when ALERT-PAY was adopted or when the operative paragraph changed.",
            "matched": [
              "PayPal"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "118e18aeabfd0994508abfe0430985b6a342d1385763c63215695f4a1ed96672"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. Two PayPal policy originals were retained; Mastercard's complete public policy was read through the successful official reader after its ordinary GET failed. No report form, account, live list or payment operation was used. This is a scoped comparison of public rules, not confirmation of a signed WIPO-provider agreement.",
            "matched": [
              "PayPal"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "de9f82707100b6b0a5f7aed5a544a67f75e8fd01abe47959a6af8e0b08d75f42"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures",
            "heading": "Identity, chronology and decision rights",
            "text": "Deck4 names Mastercard and PayPal, alongside other PSPs as the intended/global cooperation class. Deck7 does not individually identify the two pilot PSPs or six rights holders. The automatic transcript says the interface currently under development offers PayPal and Mastercard. None of these independently names the two historical pilot providers. Illustrative Adidas-labelled screens likewise do not prove Adidas joined the pilot or signed a programme contract.",
            "matched": [
              "PayPal"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a38e5baa7cbcbf619c0099306f4f1f05c86092d0bb9b010f78d939ef013b5e4"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
            "title": "PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal",
            "heading": "PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal",
            "text": "PayPal's notice , issued June 29, gives September 14,2026 as the effective date for revised US dispute terms. This is a commencement-date observation, not a newly announced ban. The linked US agreement carries today's date; the effective hour and zone are unspecified.",
            "matched": [
              "PayPal"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "eeaa5c6b62025153a54593d81c52df08af6ed63c47ae209c615ed643020c25c2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September 14",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September 14,2026",
            "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
            "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
          },
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mastercard",
      "label": "Mastercard",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A payment network whose rules govern participating financial institutions and parts of the merchant onboarding process.",
      "aliases": [
        "Master Card",
        "MATCH",
        "banking"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Card-payment network"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mastercard",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mastercard",
        "name": "Mastercard",
        "role": "Card-payment network",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "A payment network whose rules govern participating financial institutions and parts of the merchant onboarding process.",
        "why": "Its MATCH system passes information about merchants between institutions. The institution receiving a record can make a more restrictive decision than the network’s minimum requirements.",
        "about": [
          "The August 2026 rules examined here require inquiry into listed merchants but explicitly permit onboarding them. Stripe’s published practice is generally disqualifying, with possible exceptions. A network record and a processor’s decision therefore need separate explanations."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Master Card",
          "MATCH",
          "banking"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A payment network whose rules govern participating financial institutions and parts of the merchant onboarding process.",
        "structuralRole": "Network rules and shared merchant-risk infrastructure",
        "significance": "Mastercard’s role includes defining network requirements and operating shared merchant-risk infrastructure. Those records can affect many acquiring banks and processors, while each participant’s additional policies influence the eventual customer outcome.",
        "background": [
          "The August 2026 rules examined here require inquiry into listed merchants but explicitly permit onboarding them. Stripe’s published practice is generally disqualifying, with possible exceptions. A network record and a processor’s decision therefore need separate explanations."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported participation in UK payments formation",
            "text": "Sky names Mastercard among early PDC participants. Its September 14 financing story describes a planned approximately £50m setup equity solicitation, not closed funding. No participant-specific contribution, equity percentage or voting right was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              },
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-mastercard-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-pdc"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Mastercard legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-mastercard"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March2026 notice describes law-dependent access/correction/restriction/deletion/complaint routes, with California requests to relevant institutions and other requests possibly redirected. One-month written reply is not correction deadline; no universal processing entitlement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may seek applicable personal-information remedies",
            "sourceName": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy requires acquirer investigation/reporting within2businessdays for law-enforcement evidence or5 for qualifying private referrals, with discretionary extensions. WIPO is not classified as law enforcement here; clocks are not added to WIPO notice periods.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-investigation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires investigation and reporting",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section11.13 permits removal for erroneous addition reported by an authorized user or specified cured PCI code12 noncompliance. Merchant direct application when acquirer unwilling/unable is narrow PCI route, not general bypass.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-correction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits early removal on specified grounds",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Section11.10 provides5year listing retention/purge; recipient records persist at least2years after agreement end and inquiry records365days. Central purge does not erase all downstream records or restore processing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-purge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides five-year listing purge",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "General Anti-Piracy Policy permits rights-owner/authorized-association referrals with evidence and attestations. This does not prove a WIPO ALERT-PAY intake route or accepted Creative request.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-referral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may submit qualifying IP referrals under general policy",
            "sourceName": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mastercard reserves interpretation/enforcement and possible membership restriction or sanctions for noncompliance. No exercised sanction in this packet.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains policy interpretation and membership sanctions",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pre-event rules assign acquirer responsibilities and provide brand-harm enforcement measures. No incident-specific notice or penalty recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n41"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Network compliance obligations",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "date": "Rules dated 2025-06-03; §§5.1.2, 5.12.7"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights",
            "heading": "Mastercard: investigation, product-level action, and conditional wider notice",
            "text": "The policy's opening BRAM context also reserves discretion over transactions considered damaging to Mastercard's goodwill. That broader context should not be silently turned into an ALERT-PAY eligibility criterion. The inspected programme concerns counterfeit goods and subscription piracy; the underlying provider contract may have other grounds, whose application requires separate evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Mastercard"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "63b7543475636f29cddad7f114faf0d088f7f2d2ac8f0793cdd79c0dfae5aa52"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights",
            "heading": "Mastercard: investigation, product-level action, and conditional wider notice",
            "text": "This is the provider's general policy, not an acquired ALERT-PAY addendum. WIPO's institutional status does not establish that its alert enters the law-enforcement route. Do not add Mastercard's two/five-business-day clocks to WIPO's notification clocks. A merits response, merchant termination and MATCH entry remain distinct. No MATCH deletion/restoration rule or completed appeal was acquired in this lane; that does not establish that none exists elsewhere.",
            "matched": [
              "Mastercard"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c191dca056ecbb9b0610843b07a35c52a811fcca2855a9c3165ee8a57d9641df"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
            "heading": "The records still held elsewhere",
            "text": "The Steam joint is Valve's processor notice and response, the corresponding Mastercard/acquirer message and the actual counterparty identities. Valve payments/legal and its processor counterparts should hold operational communications; Valve press and GamingOnLinux hold the identified company replies. The published replies establish an attributed account, not the contents of unrecovered upstream records.",
            "matched": [
              "Mastercard"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b90197939235fcce5935852deb11de2bcf2fda1af1acd70a52bbbd45ad416f8b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest new addition is Steam's own attributed notice chain. Valve supplied statements to the journalist who published them, including a rejected alternative and the precise Mastercard rule reportedly invoked. Separately, original itch records expose an earlier platform payout decision and a contemporaneous UK geographic-compliance decision. The bank behind itch's July 2025 restriction remains unidentified.",
            "matched": [
              "Mastercard"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "541869e3b1118b36635503e46aaff354423981dd323a9b88f45d40dd3ddd5856"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
            "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
          },
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
            "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Mastercard operates a payment network whose rules govern participating financial institutions and merchant-risk processes. It can require acquiring banks to investigate referrals and enforce network standards, and its MATCH system supplies risk information that other payment firms use when deciding whom to serve.",
          "structuralRole": "Network rules and shared records governing payment eligibility",
          "significance": "Mastercard is important because a decision or risk record at the network level can affect multiple payment relationships. Its rules interact with banks' and processors' own policies, creating a chain of decisions between a complaint and a merchant losing service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Mastercard is a payment network with rules that participating financial institutions must follow. In this investigation, its significance lies in that rulemaking position and in the shared merchant-risk infrastructure used by payment providers. A website may deal directly with a processor, but its ability to take card payments also depends on the acquiring bank and the network behind that relationship.",
            "Its anti-piracy policy illustrates how outside information enters the system. Qualifying rights owners and authorized associations can submit referrals supported by evidence and attestations. Mastercard's policy requires the acquirer to investigate and report, with different response periods for law-enforcement evidence and qualifying private referrals. Mastercard reserves authority to interpret and enforce its policy and can impose restrictions or sanctions on network participants that fail to comply.",
            "MATCH adds another mechanism. It stores specified merchant-risk information that prospective providers can consult. The rules include a five-year central listing period and certain grounds for early removal. Stripe's published practice generally disqualifies listed merchants, while allowing consideration of documented exceptional circumstances. A shared risk record can therefore influence a later commercial decision made by a different company.",
            "The gaming controversy exposed how difficult it can be to see the whole chain from outside. Valve described indirect Mastercard communications through processors and acquiring banks; Mastercard publicly denied evaluating games or requiring game-platform restrictions. The original instructions and all counterparties remain unavailable. The established structural point is substantial: network policy, bank decisions and processor discretion together determine whether a lawful online business can accept a widely used form of payment.",
            "Sky names Mastercard among early PDC participants. Its September 14 financing story describes a planned approximately £50m setup equity solicitation, not closed funding. No participant-specific contribution, equity percentage or voting right was acquired."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
              "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
              "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
              "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
              "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
            },
            {
              "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
              "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "stripe-bank-reference",
      "label": "Stripe banking partners · unidentified",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Real-world counterparties referenced in itch's relayed Stripe explanation; identities and original instruction are unresolved.",
      "aliases": [
        "Stripe banking partners · unidentified"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Unidentified party"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/stripe-bank-reference",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "stripe-bank-reference",
        "name": "Stripe banking partners · unidentified",
        "role": "Unidentified party",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Real-world counterparties referenced in itch's relayed Stripe explanation; identities and original instruction are unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Real-world counterparties referenced in itch's relayed Stripe explanation; identities and original instruction are unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Stripe banking partners · unidentified"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Real-world counterparties referenced in itch's relayed Stripe explanation; identities and original instruction are unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Unidentified party",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "itch says Stripe asked it to convey that banking partners constrained sexually explicit content despite card-network support for appropriately registered adult content. Bank identity and original instruction missing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n37"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Bank restriction relayed by itch",
            "sourceName": "Stripe banking partners · unidentified",
            "targetName": "Stripe",
            "date": "July 31, 2025 post; subsequently edited"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mc-acquirers",
      "label": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Class of institutions bound by the rulebook. This does not name itch's acquirer.",
      "aliases": [
        "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mc-acquirers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mc-acquirers",
        "name": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Class of institutions bound by the rulebook. This does not name itch's acquirer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Class of institutions bound by the rulebook. This does not name itch's acquirer."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mastercard acquirers are the financial institutions responsible for bringing merchants into the card network and meeting the network's merchant-compliance rules. This is a class of regulated commercial counterparties in the rulebook, not an identification of Steam's or itch.io's particular acquiring bank.",
        "structuralRole": "Merchant-facing institutions translating network rules into investigation, acceptance and termination decisions",
        "significance": "Acquirers are a practical enforcement point because they can affect a merchant's ability to take payments. Network rules also make them responsible for investigation, reporting and accuracy when information enters a shared merchant-risk system. Their discretion matters: a risk-list entry does not automatically require refusal of service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Investigation and reporting have distinct triggers",
            "text": "The anti-piracy policy requires investigations within specified periods and cessation of Mastercard acceptance for affirmatively infringing products, which need not mean termination of the entire merchant. Applicable termination can trigger MATCH reporting. The security rules also require merchant inquiries while expressly permitting onboarding despite a MATCH entry. Acquirers retain accuracy and reasonable-correction responsibilities even when work is delegated; response deadlines do not guarantee removal of an entry. These rulebook obligations do not establish an incident-specific notice or penalty in the Steam and itch.io dispute.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "n41",
              "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
              "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
              "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
              "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
              "w30-class-e-match-access",
              "w30-class-e-match-entry",
              "w30-class-e-match-admission",
              "w30-class-e-match-accuracy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section11.5 combines termination by merchant/acquirer with reason to believe a listed condition exists. Five calendar days runs from earlier listed decision/notice/awareness events, not effective termination; awareness is not detached from the opening condition.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-entry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must report under qualifying termination triggers",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy requires acquirer investigation/reporting within2businessdays for law-enforcement evidence or5 for qualifying private referrals, with discretionary extensions. WIPO is not classified as law enforcement here; clocks are not added to WIPO notice periods.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-investigation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires investigation and reporting",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Acquirers retain accuracy responsibility when delegating work; good faith, reason-code grounds and reasonable correction are required. Removal requests require a30calendar-day response, listing questions7; neither clock guarantees removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-accuracy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retain accuracy and reasonable-correction responsibility",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "An affirmative policy finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; negative findings require compelling evidence. Product cessation is not automatically full merchant termination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must end acceptance for affirmatively infringing products",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections11.2/11.6.4 expressly allow onboarding notwithstanding a MATCH entry; mandatory inquiry does not require refusal. Each institution makes its own decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-admission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may admit a listed merchant",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Anti-Piracy Policy conditionally requires MATCH notice if the acquirer terminates the merchant; no particular WIPO/Creative merchant report is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must report applicable merchant termination",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mastercard reserves interpretation/enforcement and possible membership restriction or sanctions for noncompliance. No exercised sanction in this packet.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains policy interpretation and membership sanctions",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pre-event rules assign acquirer responsibilities and provide brand-harm enforcement measures. No incident-specific notice or penalty recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n41"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Network compliance obligations",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "date": "Rules dated 2025-06-03; §§5.1.2, 5.12.7"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
            "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "itch-reindex",
      "label": "Free NSFW reindexing",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "July 31, 2025 update required the No Payments setting for the described reindexing.",
      "aliases": [
        "Free NSFW reindexing"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/itch-reindex",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "itch-reindex",
        "name": "Free NSFW reindexing",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "July 31, 2025 update required the No Payments setting for the described reindexing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "July 31, 2025 update required the No Payments setting for the described reindexing."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Free NSFW reindexing"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "July 31, 2025 update required the No Payments setting for the described reindexing.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The July 31 update required disabling payments for the described free-content reindexing. Current post has edits; original snapshot not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n40"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "No Payments condition published",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "Free NSFW reindexing",
            "date": "2025-07-31 published update"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ftx-estate",
      "label": "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Recovery actor in a December 2023 court filing; distinct from original donors and former executives.",
      "aliases": [
        "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ftx-estate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ftx-estate",
        "name": "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Recovery actor in a December 2023 court filing; distinct from original donors and former executives.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recovery actor in a December 2023 court filing; distinct from original donors and former executives."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
            "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recovery actor in a December 2023 court filing; distinct from original donors and former executives.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Court-filed disclosure lists CAIS among completed donation-recovery resolutions. This is a party's filed account; exact agreement, payment mechanics and reserve reconciliation remain missing. Financial details: value: 5,200,000; currency: USD; kind: party-reported settlement resolution; period: 2023-12-16 filing Amount basis: reported settlement",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n44"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
                "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$5.2m resolution reported by debtors",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "FTX debtors / bankruptcy estate",
            "date": "2023-12-16 filing"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
            "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cais-reserve",
      "label": "CAIS potential-refund reserve",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2023 carrying value $5,259,802. It is an accounting reserve, not a bank transfer.",
      "aliases": [
        "CAIS potential-refund reserve"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Accounting record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cais-reserve",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cais-reserve",
        "name": "CAIS potential-refund reserve",
        "role": "Accounting record",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "2023 carrying value $5,259,802. It is an accounting reserve, not a bank transfer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2023 carrying value $5,259,802. It is an accounting reserve, not a bank transfer."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "CAIS potential-refund reserve"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2023 carrying value $5,259,802. It is an accounting reserve, not a bank transfer.",
        "structuralRole": "Accounting record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2023 Schedule D Part X uses conditional reserve language; this entry is not a payment receipt. Financial details: value: 5,259,802; currency: USD; kind: potential refund reserve; period: Year ended 2023-12-31 Amount basis: carrying value",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n43"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$5,259,802 potential-refund reserve",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "CAIS potential-refund reserve",
            "date": "Year ended 2023-12-31"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cais-2024-close",
      "label": "CAIS 2024 liability close",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Other liabilities close at $483,825, identified entirely as an operating lease liability; prior refund reserve no longer appears.",
      "aliases": [
        "CAIS 2024 liability close"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Accounting record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/cais-2024-close",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cais-2024-close",
        "name": "CAIS 2024 liability close",
        "role": "Accounting record",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Other liabilities close at $483,825, identified entirely as an operating lease liability; prior refund reserve no longer appears.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Other liabilities close at $483,825, identified entirely as an operating lease liability; prior refund reserve no longer appears."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "CAIS 2024 liability close"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Other liabilities close at $483,825, identified entirely as an operating lease liability; prior refund reserve no longer appears.",
        "structuralRole": "Accounting record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 return carries $5,259,802 at opening. Closing other liabilities are $483,825, solely an operating lease liability in Schedule D. Cash settlement versus release/reclassification is unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n45"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Refund reserve no longer listed",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "CAIS 2024 liability close",
            "date": "Year ended 2024-12-31"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mastercard-statement",
      "label": "Mastercard gaming statement",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "August 1, 2025 statement denying direct intervention. A published response, not a restriction instruction.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Artifact"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/mastercard-statement",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "mastercard-statement",
        "name": "Mastercard gaming statement",
        "role": "Artifact",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "August 1, 2025 statement denying direct intervention. A published response, not a restriction instruction.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "August 1, 2025 statement denying direct intervention. A published response, not a restriction instruction."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "August 1, 2025 statement denying direct intervention. A published response, not a restriction instruction.",
        "structuralRole": "Artifact",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mastercard's published response denies evaluating games or requiring restrictions on game platforms. This does not identify the downstream decision-maker.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "n42"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Denied directing game restrictions",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard gaming statement",
            "date": "2025-08-01"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "icmec",
      "label": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "US nonprofit; legislative sponsor and financial-coalition operator. Separate programme funding and policy work require their own evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/icmec",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "icmec",
        "name": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "US nonprofit; legislative sponsor and financial-coalition operator. Separate programme funding and policy work require their own evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "US nonprofit; legislative sponsor and financial-coalition operator. Separate programme funding and policy work require their own evidence.",
          "Consolidated net-asset deficit",
          "Programme-restricted net assets",
          "Direct lobbying expenditure"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828"
          },
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 18
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children is a US nonprofit working on child protection. In this investigation it appears as a legislative sponsor, a participant in policy drafting and an operator of financial-sector cooperation programmes.",
        "structuralRole": "Child-protection advocacy linked to financial-sector programmes",
        "significance": "ICMEC connects legislative work with programmes involving financial institutions. The US organisation and its Australian counterpart have distinct governance and funding histories, which matters when tracing authority over data-sharing or policy activity.",
        "background": [
          "Consolidated net-asset deficit",
          "Programme-restricted net assets",
          "Direct lobbying expenditure"
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Schedule R Part IV Australia row reports ICMEC as direct controlling entity, C CORP tax class, 100% ownership and controlled Yes. These are reported tax characterizations, not independently established continuing control after 6 July 2023. Inclusion can reflect an any-time relationship; percentage ownership uses the related entity tax-year end. Applicable Australian tax period and supporting basis remain unresolved. Original is a publisher-hosted signed public copy; IRS receipt or acceptance was not independently read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-member-e-tax-related-return"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
                "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports a related-corporation characterization of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "2023 calendar-year return signed 6 December 2024; no inferred effective date for Australian membership rights"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Schedule R Part V Australia row is type L, USD 868,571, method FMV; D/E loan categories are No. IRS measurement can use value provided or received, whichever higher. No inference of cash direction, loan, grant, specific service or donor/project allocation. Financial details: value: 868,571; currency: USD; kind: reported fair market value transaction amount; period: 2023 tax year",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-member-e-services-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
                "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported transaction in services, membership or fundraising category with",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "US 2023 calendar-year return; individual transaction dates not disclosed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 3,659,693; currency: USD; kind: unrecognized conditional future contribution agreements; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-fin-conditional"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports unrecognized future conditional contributions of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "date": "2024-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 817,886; currency: USD; kind: restricted net-asset stock; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-fin-restricted"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports programme-restricted net assets of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "date": "2024-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 2,293,789; currency: USD; kind: net-asset deficit; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-fin-deficit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports a consolidated net-asset deficit of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "date": "2024-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "JCOTS itself records this causal connection. This closes a specific advocacy-to-drafting step; authorship of all eventual language and funding remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-uptake"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Virginia device-age draft request",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "presentation prompted drafting request",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "Virginia device-age draft request",
            "date": "November6 to December3,2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "US2023 Note1 says no longer sole member; Note8 says no longer controls. Does not name new members or establish complete US membership withdrawal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-fin-e-control-ended"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ceased sole membership and control",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "2023-07-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Note7 also records management plans and signed2026 grants/contracts; this is a dated going-concern disclosure, not proof of present insolvency.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-going-concern"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC fundraising dependence",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "discloses substantial doubt and dependence on unrestricted fundraising",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC fundraising dependence",
            "date": "FY2024 accounts issued2026-01-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828"
          },
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings",
            "title": "Membership and US tax-return seam — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The US International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children combines child-protection advocacy with a financial-industry coalition and technical-policy proposals. It has participated in California age-assurance legislation and promoted device-based approaches intended to move age information through the digital ecosystem.",
          "structuralRole": "Connecting financial-sector cooperation with age-assurance legislative proposals",
          "significance": "ICMEC is significant where child protection meets payment companies and device-level policy. Its coalition relationships and legislative contributions provide concrete routes for an NGO's technical concepts to reach institutions that can change everyday access requirements.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children is a US organization working on child protection through policy and programmes. One of those programmes is a financial coalition involving payment-industry participants. The coalition places it in contact with firms whose decisions affect how money moves online, while its legislative work takes child-protection arguments into the rules governing digital services.",
            "California offers a specific example. An April 2025 legislative analysis identified ICMEC as a sponsor of the then-current Digital Age Assurance Act proposal. Policy-engagement director Bob Cunningham publicly described continuing drafting work with Assemblymember Buffy Wicks and her staff. ICMEC also hosted a device-based age-assurance whitepaper. The model concerns how age information can be supplied through devices and services, making it relevant to a much broader part of the internet than one website's entrance check.",
            "The organization's finances reveal that policy relevance and financial abundance are different things. Its 2024 consolidated statements reported a net-asset deficit of about $2.294 million, alongside programme-restricted assets and future conditional contributions. The accounts disclosed substantial doubt about continuing operations and dependence on unrestricted fundraising, together with management's plans and signed 2026 grants and contracts. Those are the conditions in the inspected financial record, rather than a measure of its present bank balance.",
            "Its international relationships also changed. The US accounts say it ceased sole membership and control of ICMEC Australia in July 2023. The Australian organization now operates its own financial-sector work and investigative platform. Reading those institutions separately makes their practical roles clearer: the US body connects coalition work and legislative proposals, while the Australian body supplies a distinct data application and partnership structure."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "ICMEC supporters",
              "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
            },
            {
              "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
              "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
              "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
            },
            {
              "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
              "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
              "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "icmec-financial-coalition",
      "label": "ICMEC financial coalition",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation; programme donor listing supplies no policy earmark.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/icmec-financial-coalition",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "icmec-financial-coalition",
        "name": "ICMEC financial coalition",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation; programme donor listing supplies no policy earmark.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation; programme donor listing supplies no policy earmark."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation is an ICMEC programme connecting financial-sector organisations around child-exploitation risks. ICMEC's supporters page lists programme donors, and Block separately describes Cash App as regularly involved in the ICMEC-led US coalition.",
        "structuralRole": "Financial-sector convening programme linking resources and practitioner participation",
        "significance": "The coalition creates a setting where organisations with payment and account powers can exchange expertise around a common problem. That is a relevant influence and capacity-building relationship, while donations, participation and operational instructions remain different claims. Its existence does not make ICMEC the controller of other shared-data programmes.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Support and involvement are the documented relationships",
            "text": "The retained supporter listing names donor relationships without amounts, dates or an earmark for age-assurance policy. Block's 10 September 2025 document reports regular Cash App involvement but does not specify formal membership, a vote or a start date. These sources support an organised financial-sector programme and named participation. They do not supply a common grant agreement, decision minutes or a connection authorising ICMEC to direct Lantern recipients or an individual bank-account closure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
                "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i01",
              "i02",
              "i03",
              "i04",
              "w22-sig-e-icmec-involvement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ICMEC identifies this financial coalition as a programme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i01"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Block says Cash App regularly involved in ICMEC-led US coalition. Wording does not establish formal membership/vote or ICMEC control of Lantern.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-icmec-involvement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
                "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports regular involvement in US coalition",
            "sourceName": "Cash App",
            "targetName": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "date": "Document 10 September 2025; involvement interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i02"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "children-now",
      "label": "Children Now",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Children Now was named as a sponsor of → California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act. Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/children-now",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "children-now",
        "name": "Children Now",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Children Now was named as a sponsor of → California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act. Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Children Now was named as a sponsor of → California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act. Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
            "sourceName": "Children Now",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-04-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "What changes the model",
            "text": "A newly documented institutional bridge deserves follow-up: ICMEC publicly lists payment companies as donors to its financial coalition, while California's official April 2025 committee analysis identifies ICMEC and Children Now as sponsors of AB1043. ICMEC programme funding, legislative sponsorship, research citation, and software implementation must retain their separate relation types. The present record does not show that those donations financed the legislation, whitepaper, or Steam restrictions.",
            "matched": [
              "Children Now"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "702201bcf9af2d3b1d97a487a0a11e8792f6cfb57c86e0dd824e27d4ea7ef361"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "visa",
      "label": "Visa",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Visa is listed as a programme donor to → ICMEC financial coalition. The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/visa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "visa",
        "name": "Visa",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Visa is listed as a programme donor to → ICMEC financial coalition. The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Visa is a card-payment network appearing here through an ICMEC programme-donor listing, requests for action against sellers of deepfake intimate-image abuse, and a court-described historical investigation route. These connections concern financial infrastructure and risk decisions rather than a single common programme or policy.",
        "structuralRole": "Payment network with safety-support relationships and merchant-risk influence",
        "significance": "A card network can affect merchants through rules and investigations transmitted to acquiring institutions. It can also receive advocacy or government requests and support outside safety programmes. Following those mechanisms separately avoids treating a donor listing as proof of a specific merchant instruction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A request, a donor credit and a historical case",
            "text": "ICMEC's supporters page names Visa without an amount, donation date or age-policy earmark. The 22 August 2025 attorneys-general letter asks Visa's legal representatives about controls and further action against sellers of deepfake nonconsensual intimate-image tools or content; it does not prove implementation or impose a general pornography ban. Separately, the 2023 eGumball v Merrick Bank opinion describes a Visa investigation followed by the bank's termination and reporting in an earlier dispute. That is a historical exercised route, not evidence of ALERT-PAY participation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i04",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-visa",
              "w30-class-e-visa-investigation",
              "ed2-visa-vmss"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
              "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Reported participation in UK payments formation",
            "text": "Sky names Visa among early PDC participants. Its September 14 financing story describes a planned approximately £50m setup equity solicitation, not closed funding. No participant-specific contribution, equity percentage or voting right was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              },
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-visa-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-pdc"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Visa legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-visa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Visa",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "2023 opinion describes Visa investigation followed by Merrick's termination/reporting. This is an exercised historical route, not an ALERT-PAY link or current universal Visa rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-visa-investigation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "initiated historical investigation route",
            "sourceName": "Visa",
            "targetName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "date": "Historical2021 dispute; exact event dates not assigned here"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i04"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC supporters",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
            "sourceName": "Visa",
            "targetName": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sky names Visa among firms involved in early PDC work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-visa-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported early participation",
            "sourceName": "Visa",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-fin-note-pdc",
            "title": "UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement",
            "heading": "UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement",
            "text": "Visa and Mastercard's reported early involvement complicates a simple story of a new national system displacing foreign incumbents. The useful next records are subscription documents, incorporation and governance terms, design handover and procurement decisions. Until then, the mechanism is institution-building with unresolved financing and control, not a functioning replacement network.",
            "matched": [
              "Visa"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "79e704528b9e7c5ec8cf169493bf657b71724fb501e429af94a7c134ccfc1e91"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
            "heading": "2. Payment pressure and a documented platform response",
            "text": "Collective Shout's open letter is dated 10 July 2025 and posted 11 July. It asks PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership to stop processing transactions for Steam, itch.io and comparable platforms hosting the content it criticises. Signatories include Melinda Tankard Reist for Collective Shout; Haley McNamara, then NCOSE's Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Programs; and Professor Jon Rouse. These are public campaign endorsements, with no financial transfer or authority relationship stated. Original letter , read, including signatory list. The site's footer describes Collective Shout as a company limited by guarantee; its self-description is not substituted for the official registry.",
            "matched": [
              "Visa"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "928c0b868b0b5f1951810c16584adcd6e2fe4ac86434af0c04ce46fb79edb3c6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
            "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
          },
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ab1043",
      "label": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Chapter675 enacted October13,2025; age-signal framework operative January2027. Differences from earlier proposals remain in the evidence note.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ab1043",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ab1043",
        "name": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
        "role": "Legislation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Chapter675 enacted October13,2025; age-signal framework operative January2027. Differences from earlier proposals remain in the evidence note.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Chapter675 enacted October13,2025; age-signal framework operative January2027. Differences from earlier proposals remain in the evidence note.",
          "Chapter675 enacted October13,2025; age-signal framework operative January2027",
          "Chaptered framework differs from ICMEC model and whitepaper; per-website approval and earlier download-consent gates not established in inspected operative text"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 chaptered text and version selector",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "California AB1043, the Digital Age Assurance Act, became Chapter 675 on 13 October 2025, with its age-signal framework operative in January 2027. It allocates age information across operating-system and application relationships, using four age bands and account-entered age in the chaptered version.",
        "structuralRole": "Enacted allocation of age-signaling responsibilities after negotiated legislative revision",
        "significance": "The bill connects child-safety sponsorship with the platform layer that supplies age signals. Its history also shows why a model proposal and a final law must be read separately: scope and consent provisions changed, so the legal mechanism cannot be reconstructed simply from its sponsors' earlier whitepaper.",
        "background": [
          "Chapter675 enacted October13,2025; age-signal framework operative January2027",
          "Chaptered framework differs from ICMEC model and whitepaper; per-website approval and earlier download-consent gates not established in inspected operative text"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From proposal to chaptered text",
            "text": "The April 2025 analysis named ICMEC and Children Now as co-sponsors of a version with six bands and parental download consent. July analysis recorded Wicks's agreement to narrow application scope after stakeholder concerns. The enacted text uses four bands, includes data minimization and non-discrimination, and lacks the earlier parental-download consent and broad website scheme. Google and Meta publicly endorsed the bill in September; those statements do not identify the author of each surviving provision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB1043 chaptered text and version selector",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i05",
              "i06",
              "i14",
              "i15",
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated announcement quotes Google; endorsement does not establish authorship of every provision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly endorsed",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Meta is quoted favoring this allocation; common support is not proof of common contracts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly endorsed OS and app-store age-assurance allocation in",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies sponsor of the then-current proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i05"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-04-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Children Now",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
            "sourceName": "Children Now",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-04-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Online service/product/feature removal followed stakeholder concerns; proposer names not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Buffy Wicks",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "agrees scope narrowing",
            "sourceName": "Buffy Wicks",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-07-15"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 chaptered text and version selector",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ab1856",
      "label": "California AB1856",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Enrolled September1; presented Governor September4,2026 at4pm; no signature shown when checked September8. Pending status must be refreshed for later use.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ab1856",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ab1856",
        "name": "California AB1856",
        "role": "Legislation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Enrolled September1; presented Governor September4,2026 at4pm; no signature shown when checked September8. Pending status must be refreshed for later use.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Enrolled September1; presented Governor September4,2026 at4pm; no signature shown when checked September8. Pending status must be refreshed for later use.",
          "Enrolled September1; presented Governor September4,2026 at4pm; no signature shown when checked September8",
          "April committee proposal includes browser/website duties; enrolled text omits that scheme"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1856 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1856 enrolled text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Enrolled September1; presented Governor September4,2026 at4pm; no signature shown when checked September8. Pending status must be refreshed for later use.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [
          "Enrolled September1; presented Governor September4,2026 at4pm; no signature shown when checked September8",
          "April committee proposal includes browser/website duties; enrolled text omits that scheme"
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Family-account carveout and developer-requested blocking of minors; underlying memo not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-mpa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Motion Picture Association",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "requests design changes",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "California AB1856",
            "date": "April6 version / April21 analysis2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Generally applicable treatment of conflicting age evidence instead of family-account carveout.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Buffy Wicks",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "chooses alternative clarification",
            "sourceName": "Buffy Wicks",
            "targetName": "California AB1856",
            "date": "2026-04-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1856 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1856 enrolled text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wicks",
      "label": "Buffy Wicks",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) reported collaborating on legislative drafting with → Buffy Wicks. Cunningham publicly describes continuing drafting work with Wicks and her staff; contribution scope requires versions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wicks",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wicks",
        "name": "Buffy Wicks",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) reported collaborating on legislative drafting with → Buffy Wicks. Cunningham publicly describes continuing drafting work with Wicks and her staff; contribution scope requires versions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Buffy Wicks is the California assemblymember associated with AB1043 and its later AB1856 clarification proposal. Her announcements and official committee analyses document engagement with child-safety organizations, platform companies and industry requests during the development of age-assurance legislation.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative author selecting among competing age-assurance proposals",
        "significance": "Wicks's role is where outside proposals encounter an elected bill author's decisions. The record contains examples of scope narrowing and an alternative chosen over an industry carveout, showing negotiation rather than simple wholesale importation of an advocacy template.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Choices in the legislative record",
            "text": "Her March 2025 announcement quoted ICMEC's Bob Cunningham describing continuing drafting work with her staff and cited a 2021 5Rights report. July analysis recorded her agreement to remove online services, products and features from AB1043's application definition. In April 2026 analysis of AB1856, the Motion Picture Association sought a family-account carveout; Wicks instead chose a generally applicable clarification for conflicting age evidence. Those records distinguish contribution, citation and an author's actual selection.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i08",
              "i09",
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope",
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The announcement cites a report; citation does not establish drafting, payment or approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i09"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cited a 2021 report by",
            "sourceName": "Buffy Wicks",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "2025-03-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Cunningham publicly describes continuing drafting work with Wicks and her staff; contribution scope requires versions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i08"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported collaborating on legislative drafting with",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "Buffy Wicks",
            "date": "2025-03-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Online service/product/feature removal followed stakeholder concerns; proposer names not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "agrees scope narrowing",
            "sourceName": "Buffy Wicks",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-07-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Generally applicable treatment of conflicting age evidence instead of family-account carveout.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1856",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "chooses alternative clarification",
            "sourceName": "Buffy Wicks",
            "targetName": "California AB1856",
            "date": "2026-04-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "Drafts, decisions and operative design",
            "text": "The April2026 committee account is a credible counterpart to the previously failed Wicks-page capture. It supplies named requests, deliberation and an alternative actually chosen, although the MPA memorandum itself remains unacquired. The current record supports selective template diffusion and local negotiation; it does not establish donor control of drafting.",
            "matched": [
              "Wicks"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4b4e24ef8b663222ad4212d3ba51730fb2c8d82643e484407fe78a59ec3bb974"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Custody and limits",
            "text": "Primary pages and public original reporting were inspected through the web tool. No stolen records or criminal service were accessed. Direct archival capture of the Wicks page failed (web open 502; Python certificate-chain failure); indexed full-page text was available and read. No local raw-page capture is claimed. This intake does not modify the tested explorer or its portable bundle, and does not restart the paused heartbeat. Additional agent findings are appended below when received.",
            "matched": [
              "Wicks"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "976509dce0f2ca4d7b8fd7882fa5551d50781f8e6a8788890eee96bbf75bf19b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders",
            "text": "The visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks' chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to Aaron Skaggs in Portantino's office , and a UK/California comparison chart goes to Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom's office includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Wicks"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d0c107afb991235fd3d78bc8247064e40f5867ef59394c03390ee28c5b56c79c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "bob-cunningham",
      "label": "Bob Cunningham",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "ICMEC policy-engagement official quoted on legislative drafting.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/bob-cunningham",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "bob-cunningham",
        "name": "Bob Cunningham",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC policy-engagement official quoted on legislative drafting.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICMEC policy-engagement official quoted on legislative drafting."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Bob Cunningham is the ICMEC policy-engagement official quoted in legislative records on device-based age assurance. Wicks's March 2025 announcement identifies him as policy-engagement director; Virginia's technology commission records an earlier presentation on 6 November 2024.",
        "structuralRole": "Named advocate carrying an age-assurance proposal into state legislative discussion",
        "significance": "Cunningham gives the policy route an identifiable presenter, rather than only an organizational sponsor. The Virginia record is especially useful because it documents questions about implementation and, elsewhere in the proceedings, a resulting bill concept and drafting request. That is agenda uptake, not proof of enacted legislation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Presentation and drafting context",
            "text": "The Virginia Joint Commission on Technology and Science recorded questions about shared devices and correct age entry, with Cunningham acknowledging continued parental oversight. His later California quotation describes continuing drafting work with Wicks and her staff. The records establish a presented design and reported collaboration without assigning him authorship of every provision in subsequent bills.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i07",
              "w3-icmec-e-presentation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Commission records November6 presentation and questions about shared devices and correct age entry; Cunningham acknowledged continued parental oversight.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-presentation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Virginia JCOTS",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "presented device-based age proposal to",
            "sourceName": "Bob Cunningham",
            "targetName": "Virginia JCOTS",
            "date": "2024-11-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Wicks quotes Cunningham in this professional role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i07"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as policy-engagement director at",
            "sourceName": "Bob Cunningham",
            "targetName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "date": "2025-03-25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Virginia's JCOTS annual report records Cunningham's November6,2024 device-based age presentation and the commission's questions. Its December3 proceedings explicitly say Senator Craig's device-age bill concept resulted from that presentation and that she submitted a DLS draft request. This is an unusually clear institutional counterpart for agenda uptake. It is not proof of enacted legislation or authorship of every later provision. The original drafting request and resulting versions are highly targeted next evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Cunningham"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3f89975bce1e96b784570fdb614348edccb267ea3824c9b5501fd35042931035"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "icmec-age-whitepaper",
      "label": "ICMEC device-based age-assurance technical whitepaper",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "ICMEC-hosted technical proposal, with no named author/funder in the document; not an implementation record.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/icmec-age-whitepaper",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "icmec-age-whitepaper",
        "name": "ICMEC device-based age-assurance technical whitepaper",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC-hosted technical proposal, with no named author/funder in the document; not an implementation record.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICMEC-hosted technical proposal, with no named author/funder in the document; not an implementation record."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ICMEC-hosted technical proposal, with no named author/funder in the document; not an implementation record.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The proposed process makes approval a prerequisite to receiving age data. This is a design proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed OS-provider approval of website age-API integrations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes OS review and approval of website API integrations",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC device-based age-assurance technical whitepaper",
            "targetName": "Proposed OS-provider approval of website age-API integrations",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official hosting is established; named writer and project funder are absent in the document.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts the technical proposal",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC device-based age-assurance technical whitepaper",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "api-admission-role",
      "label": "Proposed OS-provider approval of website age-API integrations",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "A proposed approval function; no unnamed secret holder is inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed function"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/api-admission-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "api-admission-role",
        "name": "Proposed OS-provider approval of website age-API integrations",
        "role": "Proposed function",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A proposed approval function; no unnamed secret holder is inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "A proposed approval function; no unnamed secret holder is inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A proposed approval function; no unnamed secret holder is inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed function",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The proposed process makes approval a prerequisite to receiving age data. This is a design proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC device-based age-assurance technical whitepaper",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes OS review and approval of website API integrations",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC device-based age-assurance technical whitepaper",
            "targetName": "Proposed OS-provider approval of website age-API integrations",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "microsoft",
      "label": "Microsoft",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Microsoft documents planned age-group and verification-status APIs → Windows age-signals APIs. August27 documentation says APIs are not enabled at runtime yet; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/microsoft",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "microsoft",
        "name": "Microsoft",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Microsoft documents planned age-group and verification-status APIs → Windows age-signals APIs. August27 documentation says APIs are not enabled at runtime yet; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Microsoft supplies operating systems, cloud services and online platforms, and also supplies tools used to classify and restrict online content. In this investigation it appears through Windows age signals, PhotoDNA licensing, Bing removals, Xbox enforcement and a reported terrorist-content detection pilot.",
        "structuralRole": "Technology supplier with several different access gates",
        "significance": "Microsoft’s position spans the tools that compute a content signature, permissions to obtain those tools, and services that act on the result. These are distinct sources of influence. They show why owning a platform and supplying its safety technology can matter more than membership of a policy coalition.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Licensing, signals and operational decisions",
            "text": "Microsoft describes qualified free provision of PhotoDNA and retains eligibility and suspension powers in the posted 2018 Cloud terms. Tech Coalition reports receiving a sublicensing role in 2023, with qualifying non-members added in 2024; the master agreement remains unavailable. Microsoft also reported donating the on-device capability used by StopNCII and acting on 268,899 Bing image results by August 2024. That is an operator-reported action count, not unique victims or removal from source websites. The August 2026 Windows documentation describes age APIs that were not yet enabled at runtime.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
                "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
              },
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i12",
              "w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome",
              "w26-ver-e-microsoft-pilot",
              "w28-access-e-ms-software",
              "w28-access-e-ms-2012-license",
              "w28-access-e-ms-cloud-authority",
              "w28-access-e-ms-tc-delegation",
              "w28-access-e-bing-donation",
              "w28-access-e-bing-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A company-controlled conduct consultation",
            "text": "Microsoft AI published a six-week consultation draft for its own MAI models. It is not yet being used to train current models; revised guidance is intended for development from 2027. The company retains feedback-selection discretion. Publication was at 13:00Z, before this evening’s acquisition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Posted May2018 terms specify continuing eligibility discretion, accurate information, security and account suspension. They do not govern later TC software sublicences by inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-cloud-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains eligibility, reverification and suspension powers",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Andreessen/Horowitz and Nadella/Smith jointly publish AI for Startups, proposing collaboration across Little and Big Tech.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-msft-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors joint AI policy statement",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Microsoft",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "August27 documentation says APIs are not enabled at runtime yet; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
                "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Windows age-signals APIs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents planned age-group and verification-status APIs",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Windows age-signals APIs",
            "date": "2026-08-27 documentation; checked2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Microsoft–Palantir announcement explicitly names GPT-4 and other models through Azure OpenAI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-openai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
                "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Azure OpenAI model distribution route",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Foundry/AIP integration with Azure cloud and Azure OpenAI models was announced in August 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-ms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
                "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Classified AI integration announced",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Microsoft",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Microsoft AI issued the draft and opened six weeks of public feedback.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft AI Humanist Code of Conduct — draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes MAI consultation draft",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Microsoft AI Humanist Code of Conduct — draft",
            "date": "Evening catch-up 14 September 2026; original publication 13:00Z; captured after 23:00:27Z cutoff."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Coalition2023 report attributes licensing provision to Microsoft;2024 report dates sublicensor role to2023 and qualifying non-member expansion to2024. Master contract and reserved approvals not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-tc-delegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported to have delegated PhotoDNA sublicensing",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Licensor account says Netherlands Forensics Institute and NZ Department of Internal Affairs had licensed source code. Not executed agreements, current licences or particular enforcement actions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-2012-license"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported named source-code licences in March 2012",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": "2012-03-19 – 2012-03-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet owns the Coalition selection/authority lane. It does not determine Microsoft SDK/cloud terms or NCMEC hash access, which are separate lanes. No application, account, software execution, media, hash list, outreach or payment was attempted.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c416b7e76e935ec5c7741ccd00ec0fa13d52855bc0a6e68174db385701a1c977"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access",
            "heading": "Tech Coalition and the boundary still open",
            "text": "No named Microsoft rejection or revocation decision, current signed on-premise licence, or TC master licence was located in this finite pass. That is a search limitation, not proof of universal approval or absence of restrictions. A current dated software licence/sublicence form and a public executed approval or reasoned refusal would discriminate between advertised availability and the precise approval, downstream-use, termination and reconsideration machinery. Likely custodians are Microsoft licensing and the relevant sublicensor; no contact was made.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "934311ac4bdc7913f7298239438a836e298db5cec272fd3f05e9c85d663b5b4d"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access",
            "heading": "Cloud control clauses, with their date preserved",
            "text": "The live-posted terms, visibly updated May 2018 , incorporate MOSA/Online Services Terms and give these specific terms precedence. Microsoft retains eligibility discretion, reverification and access suspension. Customers must supply accurate information, secure accounts and report account-security breaches. Use is restricted to preventing CSAM distribution and supporting related investigations. Customers authorize usage audits and customer-identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC; those reports do not replace customers' own legal reporting duties.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1ba1c07a32577ffebdc4bf6ae7a9dbcc7f2faa56892b09063c908d4c833cb745"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Next records with high explanatory value",
            "text": "ICMEC's age-assurance project budget and restricted-grant terms could connect or separate its financial-coalition funding from policy work. Legislative sponsor correspondence, versioned drafts and technical-submission records could identify who wrote or altered the operative architecture. Microsoft app-registration terms and verification-provider criteria could establish practical admission and refusal powers. Vendor data-processing agreements, retention schedules, subprocessor lists and deletion audit evidence could establish where an identity check leaves durable copies. IDScan's forensic account inventory and breach notices would clarify actual incident reach.",
            "matched": [
              "Microsoft"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "316de404e6ad931f6e755a9e49cab2acb03c22d39383e4d0fb2f594ec3c32430"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
            "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Microsoft supplies infrastructure used to run AI and technology used to identify and restrict online content. Its position spans cloud hosting, government partnerships, licensing of safety tools, platform enforcement and proposals about who should perform age checks.",
          "structuralRole": "Cloud, platform rules and shared safety technology",
          "significance": "Microsoft helps build both the capability and the machinery governing its use. A licensing condition, cloud partnership or platform decision can carry more practical weight than a public policy statement.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Microsoft appears in several parts of this network because it supplies infrastructure other institutions depend on. Its cloud and AI services help organizations build operational systems; its platforms make their own access and content decisions; its safety tools help other organizations identify material they may restrict.",
            "PhotoDNA is a particularly concrete example. Microsoft offers the technology to qualified organizations under eligibility and use conditions. Tech Coalition reports acquiring a sublicensing role in 2023 and extending qualifying access to non-members in 2024. A technical tool therefore also has a governance layer: someone decides who can obtain it and under what conditions.",
            "Microsoft also reported providing the on-device capability used by StopNCII and acting on 268,899 Bing image results by August 2024 in its intimate-image-abuse work. This is how a shared safety service connects to a platform’s own enforcement. Its Windows age-signals documentation describes another possible layer of infrastructure, although the August 2026 documentation said those APIs were not yet enabled at runtime.",
            "In the AI deployment branch, Microsoft’s partnership with Palantir brings Azure OpenAI services toward classified government environments. In policy, its leaders coauthored an AI-for-startups statement with Andreessen and Horowitz. Microsoft can be a vendor, an infrastructure provider, a rule implementer and a coalition partner in different parts of the same debate.",
            "Microsoft AI published a six-week consultation draft for its own MAI models. It is not yet being used to train current models; revised guidance is intended for development from 2027. The company retains feedback-selection discretion. Publication was at 13:00Z, before this evening’s acquisition."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
              "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
            },
            {
              "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
              "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
              "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
              "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
              "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
              "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "meta",
      "label": "Meta",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Meta publicly endorsed OS and app-store age-assurance allocation in → California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act. Meta is quoted favoring this allocation; common support is not proof of common contracts.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/meta",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "meta",
        "name": "Meta",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Meta publicly endorsed OS and app-store age-assurance allocation in → California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act. Meta is quoted favoring this allocation; common support is not proof of common contracts.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Meta is a technology company appearing here as a platform operator, infrastructure contributor, industry-governance participant and public advocate on age-assurance allocation. These roles connect several safety systems, but each relationship has its own mechanism: hosting, investigation, a board chair, restricted support or a stated policy position.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform company spanning shared infrastructure, private governance and policy advocacy",
        "significance": "Meta's reach is partly infrastructural: providing a common hosting environment can help other organisations exchange signals, while its own investigations can supply information for recipients to assess. Its additional governance and funding links deserve attention without treating all participating programmes as a single company-controlled decision system.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Concrete links across the safety ecosystem",
            "text": "Lantern reports describe Meta providing ThreatExchange hosting in kind and conducting an investigation in a case later shared through the programme. GIFCT's governance page names Meta as Operating Board chair for 2026. SWGfL's accounts show a META/Facebook restricted fund with GBP20,000 incoming and expended in 2023/24 for work against nonconsensual intimate-image sharing; the exact paying entity and StopNCII-only allocation are unestablished. Separately, a September 2025 legislative announcement quotes Meta supporting operating-system and app-store age-assurance allocation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i15",
              "w22-sig-e-hosting",
              "w22-sig-e-meta-case",
              "w26-ver-e-meta-chairs",
              "w28-access-e-nain-meta",
              "w28-access-e-meta-swgfl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "current-synthesis",
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
              "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The named role",
            "text": "The current governance roster lists Marc Andreessen as a director since June 2008 and a Risk & Strategy Committee member. It also lists other committee members; Andreessen is not identified as chair.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta governance roster",
                "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-meta"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "What the committee does",
            "text": "The charter effective 1 June 2025 covers assessment of strategic priorities, technology and product initiatives, partnerships and new business lines. It provides for recommendations on balancing growth and risk and for retaining advisers at company expense.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
                "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Where that authority ends",
            "text": "The board appoints and may remove members, and may generally perform committee actions itself. The charter is not proof of Andreessen's vote on a specific decision, personal command of model development, or a contractual obligation to adopt his public AI position.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
                "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "META/Facebook fund:FY2024£20000 incoming and expended, purpose combating NCII sharing/supporting victims. Exact paying Meta entity and StopNCII-only allocation unestablished; no FY2025row does not establish all support ended. Financial details: value: 20,000; currency: GBP; kind: comparative restricted income; equal expense; period: Year ended31March2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-meta-swgfl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is labelled as comparative restricted support in the accounts",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current roster places Andreessen on Meta's board and Risk & Strategy Committee. Charter provides strategic review, recommendations and adviser-retention functions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta governance roster",
                "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
              },
              {
                "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
                "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marc Andreessen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "director; Risk & Strategy Committee member",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "Meta",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official page identifies the chair. Chair role alone does not prove a unilateral classification veto or direction to other members.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-meta-chairs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "chairs the Operating Board in 2026",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": "Stated calendar-year role; exact appointment/exercise dates not independently acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Meta is quoted favoring this allocation; common support is not proof of common contracts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
                "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly endorsed OS and app-store age-assurance allocation in",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "California AB1043, Digital Age Assurance Act",
            "date": "2025-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Covers models and quotes policy. Technical enthusiasm plus attributed quotation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan Paul",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Covers models and quotes policy",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Meta",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operator biography describes former Meta role and work with SWGfL on StopNCII launch. Employment affiliation is not an employer-reserved trustee seat or funder veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nain-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Karuna Nain",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as a former safety-policy employee",
            "sourceName": "Karuna Nain",
            "targetName": "Meta",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Meta supplies ThreatExchange hosting in kind. No monetary valuation, executed hosting rights or editorial veto over individual signals established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hosting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provides hosting in kind, according to reports",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Reportingyears 2024/2025; exact interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Police request prompted Meta own investigation and NCMEC report in described child-exploitation case; not direct government membership/upload.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-meta-case"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "conducted investigation, operator reports",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
            "date": "Reportfor 2025; exact investigation dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions",
            "heading": "Integration boundary and next discriminator",
            "text": "Precise supported relations are: Tech Coalition/member funding of Lantern without allocated amounts; Meta's in-kind hosting; Tech Coalition admission, access and programme-standard administration; participants' manual signal selection and shared taxonomy development; and recipients' own investigation and policy decisions. The 18-account outcome must remain attributed to the operator. No individual member's veto, mandatory recipient sanction, government membership, or donor instruction is established.",
            "matched": [
              "Meta"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e2f97b0ac2a71ffdfa28c806544df8b78120130c6534b2efae3b29b919970c90"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19",
            "title": "AI incidents: what the tests actually show",
            "heading": "Different incidents need different explanations",
            "text": "AP reports that Meta also hired Irregular and disclosed an internet-access misconfiguration. The map marks this relationship as reported from company statements. We have not acquired a standalone Meta postmortem.",
            "matched": [
              "Meta"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dab22441aa464846c197b149f91806b1868ec6416b312e50f5cd6e53e69f5769"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol",
            "title": "Correction is supported in the client; reversal of consequences remains unverified",
            "heading": "Custody and scope",
            "text": "The Meta deletion documentation and an initially discovered GitHub issue page failed in the web reader. No mirror was used to establish their contents. The ordinary public GitHub repository/API and pinned raw source provided the useful substitute. No repeated attempt, private-access request or live ThreatExchange query occurred. A discovered issue title was not used as evidence of a deployed Lantern defect.",
            "matched": [
              "Meta"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "047831d7fcdf48aa0bd5b717998d8d69a3006a52a28046a9a1b933d2cb7b9f4e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "text": "Marc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, public advocacy for rapid AI development, personal political giving and a corporate oversight role at Meta. The important connections run through institutions with different powers: investment funds, companies, political committees and government policy processes. A shared investor or an overlapping argument does not make those institutions a single chain of command.",
            "matched": [
              "Meta"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5b0d1ef116e80c7d29fac33dc1a66850aff4762bf46956af6d77bdc0bd564d64"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta governance roster",
            "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
            "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta AI incident and Irregular statement",
            "url": "https://apnews.com/article/meta-ai-hacking-anthropic-irregular-openai-0e8061437da6779be962b24ac134a514"
          },
          {
            "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          },
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Meta operates major online platforms and contributes infrastructure to safety systems used across companies. It also helps govern industry bodies and advocates particular ways of assigning age-assurance responsibilities, making it both a subject of regulation and a participant in its implementation.",
          "structuralRole": "Platform reach, shared signals and industry governance",
          "significance": "Meta’s influence comes from the combination of audience reach, technical infrastructure and institutional access. Its systems and policy choices can affect organizations far beyond its own services.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Meta appears here through several practical contributions to online governance. Its platforms can act directly on content and accounts. It also supplies technology and information that other organizations use to make their own decisions, extending its importance beyond the boundaries of an individual service.",
            "Lantern transparency reports describe Meta providing ThreatExchange hosting in kind and conducting an investigation whose information was shared through the program. That puts a major platform inside the infrastructure for exchanging safety signals. GIFCT’s governance roster also names Meta as chair of its Operating Board for 2026, giving it a formal place in an industry body addressing terrorist and violent-extremist content.",
            "The company has supported work against nonconsensual intimate-image sharing. SWGfL’s accounts record £20,000 of restricted META/Facebook income and expenditure for that purpose in 2023/24. In a separate legislative debate, Meta supported assigning age-assurance functions to operating systems and app stores. The allocation matters commercially and practically: it helps decide which company must perform the check and which companies may rely on it.",
            "Meta’s board also connects it to the investment and advocacy network. Marc Andreessen is a director and a Risk & Strategy Committee member, participating in oversight of technology, products and partnerships. These overlapping positions make Meta a useful example of how a platform can seek regulatory clarity while helping shape the machinery through which regulation operates."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
              "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
              "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
            },
            {
              "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
            },
            {
              "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
              "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
            },
            {
              "title": "Meta governance roster",
              "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "windows-age-signals",
      "label": "Windows age-signals APIs",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Official documentation describes planned APIs, not yet enabled at the September8 check.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/windows-age-signals",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "windows-age-signals",
        "name": "Windows age-signals APIs",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Official documentation describes planned APIs, not yet enabled at the September8 check.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official documentation describes planned APIs, not yet enabled at the September8 check."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official documentation describes planned APIs, not yet enabled at the September8 check.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
                "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft-account session",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires a signed-in user session with",
            "sourceName": "Windows age-signals APIs",
            "targetName": "Microsoft-account session",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "August27 documentation says APIs are not enabled at runtime yet; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
                "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents planned age-group and verification-status APIs",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Windows age-signals APIs",
            "date": "2026-08-27 documentation; checked2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "microsoft-account",
      "label": "Microsoft-account session",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Windows age-signals APIs requires a signed-in user session with → Microsoft-account session. The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/microsoft-account",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "microsoft-account",
        "name": "Microsoft-account session",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Windows age-signals APIs requires a signed-in user session with → Microsoft-account session. The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Windows age-signals APIs requires a signed-in user session with → Microsoft-account session. The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
                "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Windows age-signals APIs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires a signed-in user session with",
            "sourceName": "Windows age-signals APIs",
            "targetName": "Microsoft-account session",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "discord",
      "label": "Discord",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Discord documents regional methods and limited tests for → Discord age-assurance routes. The August 10 help page distinguishes established routes and limited card/Wallet tests; no completed global rollout is established. UK-specific28 July 2026 documentation separately specifies feature restrictions and continued account access for non-verifiers; method assurances remain company claims.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/discord",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "discord",
        "name": "Discord",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Discord documents regional methods and limited tests for → Discord age-assurance routes. The August 10 help page distinguishes established routes and limited card/Wallet tests; no completed global rollout is established. UK-specific28 July 2026 documentation separately specifies feature restrictions and continued account access for non-verifiers; method assurances remain company claims.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord support incident statement",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Discord is a communications platform whose age checks and internal safety systems are both represented here. It uses external verification providers for some age-assurance routes, while its own Osprey rules engine became part of the open tooling offered by ROOST.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform operator and contributor of enforcement software",
        "significance": "Discord illustrates two different kinds of infrastructure power: deciding which features require an age check, and distributing software with which other organisations can implement safety rules. The open engine does not reveal the complete policy running inside Discord.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What users encounter and what Discord contributed",
            "text": "July and August 2026 company pages describe regional verification methods and limited card or Google Wallet tests. UK users who do not verify retain accounts, direct messages and voice access, with specified content and settings restricted. Separately, Discord reported donating Osprey in July 2025. Its December engineering account described roughly 400 million daily actions across 2,288 rules; an action need not be a removal or violation. Production rules, private functions and access controls extend beyond the public engine. The age-appeals support exposure belongs to a separate historical data-custody path.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord support incident statement",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i16",
              "i22",
              "w7-impl-e-discord-settings",
              "w27-roost-e-discord-founding",
              "w27-roost-e-discord-donation",
              "w27-roost-e-discord-production",
              "w27-roost-e-clint-discord"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The August 10 help page distinguishes established routes and limited card/Wallet tests; no completed global rollout is established. UK-specific28 July 2026 documentation separately specifies feature restrictions and continued account access for non-verifiers; method assurances remain company claims.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents regional methods and limited tests for",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "ROOST current team and participant article identify Discord affiliation. Affiliation helps assess the production account as interested participant evidence; it does not establish a corporate reserved board vote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-clint-discord"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Clint Smith",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed with a professional legal-leadership affiliation",
            "sourceName": "Clint Smith",
            "targetName": "Discord",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Discord engineering reports roughly 400m daily actions, 204 action types, 2,288 rules and 99 custom UDFs as of December 2025. Actions are not necessarily violations/removals. Local ETCD rules, sinks, access/audit and unreleased functions preclude treating the public engine as the entire deployed policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-discord-production"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Osprey",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported in production with local rules and controls",
            "sourceName": "Osprey",
            "targetName": "Discord",
            "date": "Reported system metrics period; articles February/March 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "July 2025 issuer announcement and Discord engineering account trace Osprey from Discord to open ROOST tooling. Donation is software/resource transfer as reported, not an copyright assignment or customer-data transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-discord-donation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Osprey",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported donating its production-origin rules engine",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Content/settings gates include unblurring and MessageRequests changes. Opting out retains account/DMs/voice subject to restrictions. Platform documentation, not a finding that each setting is legally mandated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-discord-settings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord UK age-gated settings and content",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes age checks for specified UK features",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Discord UK age-gated settings and content",
            "date": "UK pageupdated28 July 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Founding-partner label is distinct from Discord code donation, cash amount, grant restrictions and employer-controlled board seats. No individual contribution allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-discord-founding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named as a founding partner in the issuer release",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Company reporting concerns historic support tickets for age appeals, a separate custody path from normal verification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord support incident statement",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord age-appeals support records",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported possible exposure of government-ID photos in",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Discord age-appeals support records",
            "date": "2025-10-03 statement;2025-10-09 update"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "Discord: feature gates rather than account-wide identity entry",
            "text": "OriginalGET403; web-reader body read, derivative only. Existing general Discord source and historic age-appeal support exposure remain separate. Do not treat the historic support breach as a new compromise of the normal UK verification path.",
            "matched": [
              "Discord"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7f234a2db6bde81f087acbd455bc7b0c4da199480693dcf155dd4ad203b2eff5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "Discord: feature gates rather than account-wide identity entry",
            "text": "The UK-specific help page updated28July2026 names k-ID and describes age checks to unblur flagged media, access age-restricted spaces and change certain settings, including MessageRequests. It says those declining retain account, DMs, voice, friends and servers, with the stated restrictions. It describes on-device facial estimation, document checks and a GoogleWallet test; methods are not interchangeable disclosures. This refines existing Discord/k-ID/Wallet edges rather than inventing another deployment. Its privacy and deletion statements are company claims, not tested properties.",
            "matched": [
              "Discord"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "33bf07f6570f2b21e389619f60b074fdc73e2d26fbf1b463edc9552787cfd00e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification",
            "heading": "Methods and data boundaries",
            "text": "Document-version trap: search returned a cached June 23 variant of Discord's central page saying Google shares birthdate transiently with Discord and listing an Incode test. The live canonical August 10 page instead says age group + country and omits Incode. Use the live version for current claims; do not silently mix them or infer the engineering change/date from wording alone.",
            "matched": [
              "Discord"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a7a34704fd6a0485d334d4cf14419d60112539db0b2b4c3328ff6561ac42dc0c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky",
            "heading": "What enters the map",
            "text": "The supportable paths are Discord's reported production use / contribution / reintegration , and a ROOST-published account of Bluesky production use , with platform-configured rules and a local action integration . Where the case already holds the organizations and Osprey, reuse them. Do not create an enforcement-authority edge from a logo, model-provider affiliation or working-group attendance.",
            "matched": [
              "Discord"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c26e5b413cb7f4343924fc6d5edff275a3aeb6fec572fd18f45e715b648e0541"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord support incident statement",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "k-id",
      "label": "k-ID",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Discord age-assurance routes uses verification services from → k-ID. Company documentation names k-ID; the processing path differs by method. UK-specific July 2026 page also names k-ID; facial estimation described as on-device and ID route separate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/k-id",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "k-id",
        "name": "k-ID",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Discord age-assurance routes uses verification services from → k-ID. Company documentation names k-ID; the processing path differs by method. UK-specific July 2026 page also names k-ID; facial estimation described as on-device and ID route separate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "k-ID supplies age-assurance services used in Discord’s verification process. Its role is to connect platform requirements to particular checking methods, including identity authentication through Veratad and a credit-card route through Stripe.",
        "structuralRole": "Intermediary between platform rules and identity or payment checks",
        "significance": "k-ID sits at a practical junction: Discord sets the feature gate, while the chosen verification method brings another service into the transaction. Following those method-specific routes is more informative than treating age assurance as one undifferentiated identity database.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The providers behind each method",
            "text": "Discord and k-ID documentation identify Veratad in the identity-document authentication path. A separately documented k-ID credit-card method uses Stripe; Discord describes its own card route as a limited test. The facial-estimation route has a different processing account, described by Discord as on-device. Those distinctions matter for what information is collected and by whom. A refunded card transaction, by itself, says nothing about deletion of records held by the participating services.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              },
              {
                "title": "k-ID verification methods",
                "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i17",
              "i18",
              "i19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Company documentation names k-ID; the processing path differs by method. UK-specific July 2026 page also names k-ID; facial estimation described as on-device and ID route separate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "uses verification services from",
            "sourceName": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "targetName": "k-ID",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The card route is a limited Discord test and an independently documented k-ID method; a refund does not establish deletion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "k-ID verification methods",
                "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "routes credit-card verification through",
            "sourceName": "k-ID",
            "targetName": "Stripe",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "k-ID verification methods",
                "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Veratad",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "names as an ID-authentication provider",
            "sourceName": "k-ID",
            "targetName": "Veratad",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "Discord: feature gates rather than account-wide identity entry",
            "text": "The UK-specific help page updated28July2026 names k-ID and describes age checks to unblur flagged media, access age-restricted spaces and change certain settings, including MessageRequests. It says those declining retain account, DMs, voice, friends and servers, with the stated restrictions. It describes on-device facial estimation, document checks and a GoogleWallet test; methods are not interchangeable disclosures. This refines existing Discord/k-ID/Wallet edges rather than inventing another deployment. Its privacy and deletion statements are company claims, not tested properties.",
            "matched": [
              "k-ID"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "33bf07f6570f2b21e389619f60b074fdc73e2d26fbf1b463edc9552787cfd00e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Integration decision",
            "text": "Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "k-ID"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27dd58ed9cc6399f889b2b11bf77752b784fd2456fdcd75b84def91b6b0ea605"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Discord verification addendum",
            "text": "Read discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md for the separately sourced review. Discord's August 10 primary methods page names k-ID/Veratad for document checks, k-ID/Stripe for the credit-card experiment and Google Wallet for an age-group/country signal. Credit and Wallet routes remain labelled limited tests; this pass found no official September 8 global-launch confirmation. The October 2025 age-appeals support incident concerns a different custody path and must not be assigned to those verification providers. These are vendor relationships and distinct rollout states, not evidence that Stripe directs Discord policy.",
            "matched": [
              "k-ID"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2ff07b713ed5f9a06670df94e1116ba14fdadec6e9a5dd87616d2c328ea7cea"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "veratad",
      "label": "Veratad",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "k-ID names as an ID-authentication provider → Veratad. k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/veratad",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "veratad",
        "name": "Veratad",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "k-ID names as an ID-authentication provider → Veratad. k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "k-ID names as an ID-authentication provider → Veratad. k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "k-ID verification methods",
                "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "k-ID",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "names as an ID-authentication provider",
            "sourceName": "k-ID",
            "targetName": "Veratad",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Integration decision",
            "text": "Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "Veratad"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27dd58ed9cc6399f889b2b11bf77752b784fd2456fdcd75b84def91b6b0ea605"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Discord verification addendum",
            "text": "Read discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md for the separately sourced review. Discord's August 10 primary methods page names k-ID/Veratad for document checks, k-ID/Stripe for the credit-card experiment and Google Wallet for an age-group/country signal. Credit and Wallet routes remain labelled limited tests; this pass found no official September 8 global-launch confirmation. The October 2025 age-appeals support incident concerns a different custody path and must not be assigned to those verification providers. These are vendor relationships and distinct rollout states, not evidence that Stripe directs Discord policy.",
            "matched": [
              "Veratad"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2ff07b713ed5f9a06670df94e1116ba14fdadec6e9a5dd87616d2c328ea7cea"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "google-wallet",
      "label": "Google Wallet",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Discord age-assurance routes tests receiving age-group and country signals from → Google Wallet. August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/google-wallet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "google-wallet",
        "name": "Google Wallet",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Discord age-assurance routes tests receiving age-group and country signals from → Google Wallet. August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Discord age-assurance routes tests receiving age-group and country signals from → Google Wallet. August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "tests receiving age-group and country signals from",
            "sourceName": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "targetName": "Google Wallet",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "A minimal downstream signal can depend on earlier identity proof; these are separate disclosures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i21"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
                "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "documents prior passport and face proofing for its ID-pass route",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "Google Wallet",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Integration decision",
            "text": "Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "Google Wallet"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27dd58ed9cc6399f889b2b11bf77752b784fd2456fdcd75b84def91b6b0ea605"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Discord verification addendum",
            "text": "Read discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md for the separately sourced review. Discord's August 10 primary methods page names k-ID/Veratad for document checks, k-ID/Stripe for the credit-card experiment and Google Wallet for an age-group/country signal. Credit and Wallet routes remain labelled limited tests; this pass found no official September 8 global-launch confirmation. The October 2025 age-appeals support incident concerns a different custody path and must not be assigned to those verification providers. These are vendor relationships and distinct rollout states, not evidence that Stripe directs Discord policy.",
            "matched": [
              "Google Wallet"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2ff07b713ed5f9a06670df94e1116ba14fdadec6e9a5dd87616d2c328ea7cea"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "discord-age-assurance",
      "label": "Discord age-assurance routes",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Distinct regional methods/tests; company documentation is not a live account audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/discord-age-assurance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "discord-age-assurance",
        "name": "Discord age-assurance routes",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Distinct regional methods/tests; company documentation is not a live account audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Distinct regional methods/tests; company documentation is not a live account audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Discord’s collection of age-checking methods and regional feature restrictions. The retained company documentation distinguishes facial age estimation, identity-document checks and limited tests involving payment cards or Google Wallet. Different methods involve different providers and data paths.",
        "structuralRole": "The user-facing gate between a platform and verification vendors",
        "significance": "This is where an abstract age-assurance policy becomes an actual choice for a user. Understanding the method matters: a wallet signal is not an uploaded passport, and an account’s restricted features are not necessarily a total account ban.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Methods and consequences",
            "text": "Discord’s July 2026 UK page names k-ID and describes facial estimation as on-device, with a separate ID route. Users who decline verification retain specified communication functions while some content and settings remain gated. August documentation describes Google Wallet as a test receiving age-group and country signals; it does not describe sending passport images to Discord. Card verification is also a limited test. These are the company’s descriptions of operation and privacy, rather than an independent audit or proof of global availability.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i16",
              "i17",
              "i20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The August 10 help page distinguishes established routes and limited card/Wallet tests; no completed global rollout is established. UK-specific28 July 2026 documentation separately specifies feature restrictions and continued account access for non-verifiers; method assurances remain company claims.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents regional methods and limited tests for",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google Wallet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "tests receiving age-group and country signals from",
            "sourceName": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "targetName": "Google Wallet",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Company documentation names k-ID; the processing path differs by method. UK-specific July 2026 page also names k-ID; facial estimation described as on-device and ID route separate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "k-ID",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "uses verification services from",
            "sourceName": "Discord age-assurance routes",
            "targetName": "k-ID",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "discord-age-appeals",
      "label": "Discord age-appeals support records",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Separate historic ticketing custody path, not the normal verifier flow.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/discord-age-appeals",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "discord-age-appeals",
        "name": "Discord age-appeals support records",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Separate historic ticketing custody path, not the normal verifier flow.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate historic ticketing custody path, not the normal verifier flow."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord support incident statement",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "5CA incident response",
            "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate historic ticketing custody path, not the normal verifier flow.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5CA incident response",
                "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5CA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "disputed the incident attribution concerning",
            "sourceName": "5CA",
            "targetName": "Discord age-appeals support records",
            "date": "2025-10-14 statement;2025-10-27 update"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Company reporting concerns historic support tickets for age appeals, a separate custody path from normal verification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord support incident statement",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported possible exposure of government-ID photos in",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Discord age-appeals support records",
            "date": "2025-10-03 statement;2025-10-09 update"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord support incident statement",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "5CA incident response",
            "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "5ca",
      "label": "5CA",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "5CA disputed the incident attribution concerning → Discord age-appeals support records. 5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/5ca",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "5ca",
        "name": "5CA",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "5CA disputed the incident attribution concerning → Discord age-appeals support records. 5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5CA incident response",
            "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "5CA disputed the incident attribution concerning → Discord age-appeals support records. 5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5CA incident response",
                "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord age-appeals support records",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "disputed the incident attribution concerning",
            "sourceName": "5CA",
            "targetName": "Discord age-appeals support records",
            "date": "2025-10-14 statement;2025-10-27 update"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification",
            "heading": "Structural implications and unresolved checks",
            "text": "Unknown: September account-by-account rollout coverage; Discord-specific Stripe retention and metadata linkage; implemented Wallet disclosure at the time of an individual test; audit proof of deletion/isolation; precise resolution of the 5CA disagreement. Neither a data-sale motive nor a common NGO/funder directing these Discord changes is established by these records. Discord/k-ID expressly deny selling the relevant user data; those are policy representations, not a forensic audit.",
            "matched": [
              "5CA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8c61d5fac4d571dcfcd7f44c57d22d48e71bdca159cbab3c84a8fe99be1ed416"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5CA incident response",
            "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "idscan",
      "label": "IDScan.net",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "IDScan.net acknowledged possible exposure of customer-account data in → IDScan 2026 security incident. Vendor notification does not confirm every advertised stolen-record count or customer as affected.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/idscan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "idscan",
        "name": "IDScan.net",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "IDScan.net acknowledged possible exposure of customer-account data in → IDScan 2026 security incident. Vendor notification does not confirm every advertised stolen-record count or customer as affected.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "IDScan.net is an identity-scanning and verification-services vendor associated with the VeriScan visitor-management product. The retained evidence includes a historical retail integration case study and the company's 4 September 2026 notification acknowledging possible exposure of customer-account data in a security incident.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial identity-data custodian and software supplier",
        "significance": "The vendor connects front-end identity checks to stored customer records and downstream integrations. Its role matters because verification can place sensitive identifying data in a service provider's custody. The incident adds a concrete reason to trace the actual affected systems and customers rather than equating product marketing with breach scope.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Service claims and incident scope",
            "text": "The May 2022 Planet 13 case study identifies VeriScan's scanning and visitor-management functions and describes a commercial data path into Dutchie. The later incident notification acknowledges possible exposure of customer-account data, but does not confirm every advertised stolen-record total or every claimed affected customer. No separate retained source connects IDScan.net to Discord. The documented history therefore supports a vendor, product and specified data-flow relationship while leaving current customer-level incident attribution bounded by the notification.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i24",
              "i25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor notification does not confirm every advertised stolen-record count or customer as affected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IDScan 2026 security incident",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "acknowledged possible exposure of customer-account data in",
            "sourceName": "IDScan.net",
            "targetName": "IDScan 2026 security incident",
            "date": "2026-09-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor case study identifies VeriScan visitor-management services.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VeriScan",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes operating",
            "sourceName": "IDScan.net",
            "targetName": "VeriScan",
            "date": "2022-05-23 case study"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Integration decision",
            "text": "Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "IDScan.net"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27dd58ed9cc6399f889b2b11bf77752b784fd2456fdcd75b84def91b6b0ea605"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "veriscan",
      "label": "VeriScan",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "IDScan.net describes operating → VeriScan. Vendor case study identifies VeriScan visitor-management services.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/veriscan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "veriscan",
        "name": "VeriScan",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "IDScan.net describes operating → VeriScan. Vendor case study identifies VeriScan visitor-management services.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "VeriScan is IDScan.net's visitor-management service, described in a 23 May 2022 vendor case study about the Planet 13 cannabis dispensary. The account shows identity scanning being used for entry and age-related checks together with centralised visitor records and a downstream commercial integration.",
        "structuralRole": "Identity-scanning and visitor-record layer in a documented retail data path",
        "significance": "VeriScan illustrates how an age or identity check can create a richer custody chain than a simple yes-or-no eligibility answer. Parsed document information and images can move into other business systems. That makes integration design, retention and recipient access relevant to understanding where identifying data accumulates.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A historical deployment example",
            "text": "The vendor's Planet 13 account describes scanning and centralised visitor management, including a path that passes parsed identity data and images into Dutchie. The case study supports that commercial data flow as reported in 2022. It does not establish the present configuration, every customer deployment, or that Dutchie was breached. The separate 2026 IDScan.net incident notification must be assessed on its own scope rather than projected onto every historical integration.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "i25",
              "i26",
              "i27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dutchie",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as passing parsed ID data and images into",
            "sourceName": "VeriScan",
            "targetName": "Dutchie",
            "date": "2022-05-23 case study"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Planet 13",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as using",
            "sourceName": "Planet 13",
            "targetName": "VeriScan",
            "date": "2022-05-23 case study"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor case study identifies VeriScan visitor-management services.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i25"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IDScan.net",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes operating",
            "sourceName": "IDScan.net",
            "targetName": "VeriScan",
            "date": "2022-05-23 case study"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
            "heading": "Integration decision",
            "text": "Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.",
            "matched": [
              "VeriScan"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "27dd58ed9cc6399f889b2b11bf77752b784fd2456fdcd75b84def91b6b0ea605"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "planet13",
      "label": "Planet 13",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Planet 13 was described as using → VeriScan. Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/planet13",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "planet13",
        "name": "Planet 13",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Planet 13 was described as using → VeriScan. Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Planet 13 was described as using → VeriScan. Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VeriScan",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as using",
            "sourceName": "Planet 13",
            "targetName": "VeriScan",
            "date": "2022-05-23 case study"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "dutchie",
      "label": "Dutchie",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "VeriScan was described as passing parsed ID data and images into → Dutchie. A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/dutchie",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "dutchie",
        "name": "Dutchie",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "VeriScan was described as passing parsed ID data and images into → Dutchie. A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "VeriScan was described as passing parsed ID data and images into → Dutchie. A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i27"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VeriScan",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as passing parsed ID data and images into",
            "sourceName": "VeriScan",
            "targetName": "Dutchie",
            "date": "2022-05-23 case study"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "idscan-incident",
      "label": "IDScan 2026 security incident",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Vendor acknowledged possible account-data exposure; incident scope remains under investigation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/idscan-incident",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "idscan-incident",
        "name": "IDScan 2026 security incident",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Vendor acknowledged possible account-data exposure; incident scope remains under investigation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor acknowledged possible account-data exposure; incident scope remains under investigation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Vendor acknowledged possible account-data exposure; incident scope remains under investigation.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor notification does not confirm every advertised stolen-record count or customer as affected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "i24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
                "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IDScan.net",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "acknowledged possible exposure of customer-account data in",
            "sourceName": "IDScan.net",
            "targetName": "IDScan 2026 security incident",
            "date": "2026-09-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
            "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-icmec-singapore",
      "label": "ICMEC Limited (Singapore)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) sole member and funds → ICMEC Limited (Singapore). Affiliate established May2009; Switzerland outside this consolidation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-icmec-singapore",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-icmec-singapore",
        "name": "ICMEC Limited (Singapore)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) sole member and funds → ICMEC Limited (Singapore). Affiliate established May2009; Switzerland outside this consolidation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) sole member and funds → ICMEC Limited (Singapore). Affiliate established May2009; Switzerland outside this consolidation.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Affiliate established May2009; Switzerland outside this consolidation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-singapore"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sole member and funds",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Limited (Singapore)",
            "date": "FY2024 consolidated perimeter"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-icmec-switzerland",
      "label": "ICMEC Switzerland",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "ICMEC Switzerland provides loans → International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US). Creditor identified in Note2; do not equate interested-person tax disclosure with lender identity.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-icmec-switzerland",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-icmec-switzerland",
        "name": "ICMEC Switzerland",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC Switzerland provides loans → International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US). Creditor identified in Note2; do not equate interested-person tax disclosure with lender identity.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ICMEC Switzerland provides loans → International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US). Creditor identified in Note2; do not equate interested-person tax disclosure with lender identity.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Creditor identified in Note2; do not equate interested-person tax disclosure with lender identity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-swissloan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides loans",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Switzerland",
            "targetName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "date": "2019–2021 loans disclosed FY2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-loans24",
      "label": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Franz Humer named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Financial disclosure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-loans24",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-loans24",
        "name": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
        "role": "Financial disclosure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Franz Humer named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Schedule L Part II aggregate balance"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Franz Humer named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "structuralRole": "Financial disclosure",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [
          "Schedule L Part II aggregate balance"
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-humer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Franz Humer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named interested person",
            "sourceName": "Franz Humer",
            "targetName": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "date": "FY2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-humer",
      "label": "Franz Humer",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Franz Humer named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-humer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-humer",
        "name": "Franz Humer",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Franz Humer named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Franz Humer is named as an ICMEC board member and interested person in the organization's FY2024 Form 990 disclosure of operating-fund loans.",
        "structuralRole": "Board-associated person in the operating-finance disclosure",
        "significance": "The relationship belongs to ICMEC's financing structure, rather than a specific age-assurance campaign. Schedule L identifies an interested person, which is not automatically the same as identifying the legal lender or assigning that person every amount in the table.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Loan-disclosure scope",
            "text": "The retained Form 990 records an operating-funds purpose and names Humer in the relevant schedule. The row extraction did not reliably resolve his individual loan allocation. Accordingly, this profile does not attribute a personal amount, bill-specific earmark or control over policy wording to him.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-humer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-humer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named interested person",
            "sourceName": "Franz Humer",
            "targetName": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "date": "FY2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-paul",
      "label": "Sally Paul (Form 990 spelling; supporters page: Sally Paull)",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Sally Paul (Form 990 spelling; supporters page: Sally Paull) named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-paul",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-paul",
        "name": "Sally Paul (Form 990 spelling; supporters page: Sally Paull)",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Sally Paul (Form 990 spelling; supporters page: Sally Paull) named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sally Paul is the spelling used for the board member and interested person named in ICMEC's FY2024 Form 990 operating-loan disclosure. The corpus separately records Sally Paull on the supporters page; that spelling difference is retained rather than silently harmonized.",
        "structuralRole": "Named governance participant in the operating-loan schedule",
        "significance": "Her entry helps identify the people associated with ICMEC's financing disclosures. The legal and accounting role must remain precise: association with a disclosed loan does not by itself mean that the named person personally supplied every related amount or selected how policy funds were spent.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Financial-record boundary",
            "text": "The Form 990 gives an operating-funds purpose. The table extraction did not establish a reliable individual allocation, so this profile assigns no personal sum. The spelling and lender identity would need the underlying records to reconcile them before the two public labels are treated as an exact legal match.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-paul"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-paul"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named interested person",
            "sourceName": "Sally Paul (Form 990 spelling; supporters page: Sally Paull)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "date": "FY2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-li",
      "label": "Rick Li",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Rick Li named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-li",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-li",
        "name": "Rick Li",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Rick Li named interested person → ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans. Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rick Li is named as an ICMEC board member and interested person in its FY2024 Form 990 operating-loan disclosure.",
        "structuralRole": "Board-associated participant in disclosed financing dependence",
        "significance": "The schedule places a governance participant within the organization's operating-finance record. That is useful for understanding how the institution supported its activities, but it is different from identifying who funded an age-policy project or directed a legislative intervention.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What is attributable",
            "text": "ICMEC describes the loans as serving operating-fund needs. The inspected extraction did not reliably assign a separate loan amount to Li, and an interested-person entry does not alone settle the legal lender's identity. No personal total or legislative earmark is assigned here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-li"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-interest-li"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named interested person",
            "sourceName": "Rick Li",
            "targetName": "ICMEC FY2024 Schedule L operating-fund loans",
            "date": "FY2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
      "label": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "PayPal grant enables → ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables. No amount or age-policy earmark disclosed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
        "name": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "PayPal grant enables → ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables. No amount or age-policy earmark disclosed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PayPal grant enables → ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables. No amount or age-policy earmark disclosed.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-auswg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "APFC Australia Working Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "establishes working group",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables",
            "targetName": "APFC Australia Working Group",
            "date": "Historical, undated page"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "No amount or age-policy earmark disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "grant enables",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables",
            "date": "Historical programme since2013; grant date undisclosed"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
      "label": "APFC Australia Working Group",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables establishes working group → APFC Australia Working Group. Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Working group"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
        "name": "APFC Australia Working Group",
        "role": "Working group",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables establishes working group → APFC Australia Working Group. Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables establishes working group → APFC Australia Working Group. Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
        "structuralRole": "Working group",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-aushome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "institutional home",
            "sourceName": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum",
            "targetName": "APFC Australia Working Group",
            "date": "Historical, undated page"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-auswg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "establishes working group",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Asia-Pacific Financial Coalition country roundtables",
            "targetName": "APFC Australia Working Group",
            "date": "Historical, undated page"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-auspaynet",
      "label": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum institutional home → APFC Australia Working Group. Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organization programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-auspaynet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-auspaynet",
        "name": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum",
        "role": "Organization programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum institutional home → APFC Australia Working Group. Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum institutional home → APFC Australia Working Group. Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
        "structuralRole": "Organization programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-aushome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
                "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "APFC Australia Working Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "institutional home",
            "sourceName": "Australian Payments Network, Fraud in Banking Forum",
            "targetName": "APFC Australia Working Group",
            "date": "Historical, undated page"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-model",
      "label": "ICMEC Digital Age Assurance model legislation",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) publishes hosted proposal → ICMEC Digital Age Assurance model legislation. Individual drafter/funder not established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-model",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-model",
        "name": "ICMEC Digital Age Assurance model legislation",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) publishes hosted proposal → ICMEC Digital Age Assurance model legislation. Individual drafter/funder not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US) publishes hosted proposal → ICMEC Digital Age Assurance model legislation. Individual drafter/funder not established.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Individual drafter/funder not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-hostmodel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes hosted proposal",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Digital Age Assurance model legislation",
            "date": "Undated; short title2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-mpa",
      "label": "Motion Picture Association",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Motion Picture Association requests design changes → California AB1856. Family-account carveout and developer-requested blocking of minors; underlying memo not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-icmec-mpa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-mpa",
        "name": "Motion Picture Association",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Motion Picture Association requests design changes → California AB1856. Family-account carveout and developer-requested blocking of minors; underlying memo not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Motion Picture Association is an industry organization appearing in records of age-assurance legislation, business-verification advocacy, research funding and litigation. Some older filings use the Motion Picture Association of America name, which is preserved when identifying those historical legal submissions.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry advocate connecting content businesses with policy design and intermediary accountability",
        "significance": "Its interventions show different ways industry interests enter policy: requesting a bill change, funding a study, submitting parliamentary evidence and supporting a legal argument. Those mechanisms provide a more useful account than assuming every appearance reflects the same contract or identical legal entity.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented interventions",
            "text": "California's April 2026 AB1856 analysis describes an MPA request for a family-account carveout and an option to block minors; Wicks chose a broader clarification instead. Its May 2022 parliamentary evidence advocated know-your-business-customer duties and coordination. RUSI acknowledged MPA among funders of a corrected March 2021 report on piracy and organized crime. A 2018 brief names the historical MPAA among media amici supporting DoubleVerify, without establishing funding or control of that company.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-mpa",
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-parliamentary-evidence",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
              "w30-class-e-mpaa-amicus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Filed brief names Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. among five media amici. This is the historical advocacy role, not proof of modern contracting identity, purchase of reports or funding of DV.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mpaa-amicus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appeared under historical MPAA name as amicus",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "date": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FDF0068 internal10May2022 asks departments to join the IPO forum and enact business-verification duties. Internal date is preserved without manufacturing a publication day or acceptance result.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-parliamentary-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted evidence advocating KYBC and cross-department coordination",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "date": "Internal10May2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 report disclosure"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Family-account carveout and developer-requested blocking of minors; underlying memo not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-mpa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1856",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "requests design changes",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "California AB1856",
            "date": "April6 version / April21 analysis2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit",
            "heading": "The media coalition's requested protection",
            "text": "The filed amicus was submitted in support of DoubleVerify by Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.; The Hearst Corporation; Tegna Inc.; California News Publishers Association; and First Amendment Coalition. It was filed6 June2018 and dated29 May2018. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP counsel Kelli L. Sager, Thomas R. Burke and Rochelle L. Wilcox are named; Wilcox signed it (PDF1-2,55-56). These are documented amicus/representation roles, not evidence of ownership, category authorship, funding of DoubleVerify or control of its decisions.",
            "matched": [
              "Motion Picture Association"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5beea17fb7df1827316b4171f4be485c0e1b85f60a80ed89e85b0f1976e6b5b5"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-uk-board",
      "label": "Secure Future Research directors / legal members",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Articles define trustees as directors and make those directors the only legal members. Link existing directors by their separately supported appointment dates; no invented membership list.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-controlai-uk-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-uk-board",
        "name": "Secure Future Research directors / legal members",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Articles define trustees as directors and make those directors the only legal members. Link existing directors by their separately supported appointment dates; no invented membership list.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Articles define trustees as directors and make those directors the only legal members. Link existing directors by their separately supported appointment dates; no invented membership list."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Articles define trustees as directors and make those directors the only legal members. Link existing directors by their separately supported appointment dates; no invented membership list.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Directors manage, can delegate and revoke, appoint directors, and are the sole legal members. Committee liabilities require board authority or an approved budget. No donor authority or exercise inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "formal management and budget authority",
            "sourceName": "Secure Future Research directors / legal members",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Articles filed 2024-03-20; listed in current filing history 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-unnamed-related-org",
      "label": "Unnamed related organisation owed by Control AI US",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Do not merge with Secure Future Research, a donor, or any other named entity without a naming record. This is an unresolved reference, not proof of a new additional organisation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Unidentified counterparty"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-controlai-unnamed-related-org",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-unnamed-related-org",
        "name": "Unnamed related organisation owed by Control AI US",
        "role": "Unidentified counterparty",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Do not merge with Secure Future Research, a donor, or any other named entity without a naming record. This is an unresolved reference, not proof of a new additional organisation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Do not merge with Secure Future Research, a donor, or any other named entity without a naming record. This is an unresolved reference, not proof of a new additional organisation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Do not merge with Secure Future Research, a donor, or any other named entity without a naming record. This is an unresolved reference, not proof of a new additional organisation.",
        "structuralRole": "Unidentified counterparty",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Counterparty and liability basis unresolved; no UK-US transfer edge earned. Financial details: value: 20,955; currency: USD; kind: year-end liability stock, not payment or annual funding flow; period: Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-controlai-e-us-payable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports amount due to",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Unnamed related organisation owed by Control AI US",
            "date": "Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
      "label": "Steam payment processors · unidentified",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Unresolved operational role in Valve's July/August 2025 statements. Not the existing payment-letter addressees node; no Stripe assignment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-payments-steam-processors",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
        "name": "Steam payment processors · unidentified",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Unresolved operational role in Valve's July/August 2025 statements. Not the existing payment-letter addressees node; no Stripe assignment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unresolved operational role in Valve's July/August 2025 statements. Not the existing payment-letter addressees node; no Stripe assignment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This node represents the unnamed payment processors described in Valve's July and August 2025 statements about Steam's content restrictions. It is an unresolved operational role, not a discovered company or a licence to identify Stripe or another processor by inference.",
        "structuralRole": "Unidentified commercial intermediaries transmitting payment-network objections to Steam",
        "significance": "Processors stand between a merchant and the acquiring banks or networks that enable card payments. Their ability to reject a merchant's proposed response can make a network's reputational-risk standards consequential for a store's catalogue, even where the underlying content is legal. Identifying the actual counterparties remains essential to allocating responsibility.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Valve's account of the disputed relay",
            "text": "In its statement published on 1 August 2025, Valve said its processors rejected a response limited to illegal content and cited Mastercard Rule 5.12.7. Valve also described communications reaching it through processors and acquiring banks. The retained source is a recipient-published Valve response, not the original network instruction or processor notice. It establishes Valve's account of the chain while leaving the exact sender, interpretation and scope of the objection unresolved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection",
              "w1-payments-edge-mastercard-relay-attribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Valve describes indirect Mastercard communications. Raw network instructions and counterparties are absent, so sender, scope and interpretation remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-mastercard-relay-attribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly communicated through processors and their acquiring banks",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Steam payment processors · unidentified",
            "date": "Attribution published August 1, 2025; original message date unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Valve told the recipient journalist that its processors rejected a legal-content-only response and cited Mastercard's brand-risk rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steam",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly cited Rule 5.12.7 after rejecting Valve's response",
            "sourceName": "Steam payment processors · unidentified",
            "targetName": "Steam",
            "date": "Valve statement August 1, 2025; upstream notice date not specified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-steam-retirements-202507",
      "label": "Steam July 2025 game retirements",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Valve's reported removal-from-sale decision in response to payment-provider objections.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-payments-steam-retirements-202507",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-steam-retirements-202507",
        "name": "Steam July 2025 game retirements",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Valve's reported removal-from-sale decision in response to payment-provider objections.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Valve's reported removal-from-sale decision in response to payment-provider objections."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Valve's reported removal-from-sale decision in response to payment-provider objections.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Valve said it withdrew affected games and notified developers, offering app credits for future titles, to avoid losing methods used for other purchases.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
                "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steam",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "said it retired games to preserve payment methods",
            "sourceName": "Steam",
            "targetName": "Steam July 2025 game retirements",
            "date": "Retirements reported by Valve July 17, 2025; individual game decision dates not reconstructed."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
      "label": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Platform collection/payout arrangement with eligibility review and a documented notice template.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
        "name": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Platform collection/payout arrangement with eligibility review and a documented notice template.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Platform collection/payout arrangement with eligibility review and a documented notice template."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
            "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
            "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Platform collection/payout arrangement with eligibility review and a documented notice template.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The current notice names risk/review costs and moves affected sellers away from collected payouts, with final-balance and payment-disablement conditions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
                "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes disqualification and final-payout transition terms",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
            "date": "Current undated text inspected September 8, 2026; linked from April 2023 post, but intervening version history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "In April 2023, itch's admin said selected sellers had been told to leave collected payouts while distinguishing this from a global policy change.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
                "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described selected account exclusions from collected payouts",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch collected-payout eligibility",
            "date": "Public admin statement April 26, 2023; do not imply all current template wording existed then."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
            "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
          },
          {
            "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
            "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-itch-uk-restrictions-202507",
      "label": "itch UK geographic restrictions · July 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Separate geographic compliance response described by itch; do not merge with global payment deindexing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-payments-itch-uk-restrictions-202507",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-itch-uk-restrictions-202507",
        "name": "itch UK geographic restrictions · July 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Separate geographic compliance response described by itch; do not merge with global payment deindexing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate geographic compliance response described by itch; do not merge with global payment deindexing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate geographic compliance response described by itch; do not merge with global payment deindexing.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Itch attributed UK page restrictions to OSA compliance, while preserving existing purchase downloads and offering a dashboard appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-geoblocking"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced tag-based geographic blocks with manual review and appeals",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch UK geographic restrictions · July 2025",
            "date": "Statement created July 27, 2025; describes July 25 regulatory onset; current post has five edits."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-itch-digital-id-exploration",
      "label": "itch proposed digital-ID partnerships · July 2025",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Exploration of unnamed third-party providers, not a deployed identity system or a named commercial relationship.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-payments-itch-digital-id-exploration",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-itch-digital-id-exploration",
        "name": "itch proposed digital-ID partnerships · July 2025",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Exploration of unnamed third-party providers, not a deployed identity system or a named commercial relationship.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exploration of unnamed third-party providers, not a deployed identity system or a named commercial relationship."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Exploration of unnamed third-party providers, not a deployed identity system or a named commercial relationship.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Documents the announcement of exploration. No provider selection, contract, deployment or link to the payment restriction was established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-payments-edge-itch-id-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
                "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "itch.io",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced exploration of unnamed third-party digital-ID providers",
            "sourceName": "itch.io",
            "targetName": "itch proposed digital-ID partnerships · July 2025",
            "date": "Proposal announced in July 27, 2025 post; current edited text and July 29 derivative excerpt."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
            "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "icmec-2024-accounts",
      "label": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "US and Singapore perimeter, year endedDecember31,2024; issuedJanuary29,2026. Historical accounts, not a current balance sheet.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/icmec-2024-accounts",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "icmec-2024-accounts",
        "name": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "US and Singapore perimeter, year endedDecember31,2024; issuedJanuary29,2026. Historical accounts, not a current balance sheet.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "US and Singapore perimeter, year endedDecember31,2024; issuedJanuary29,2026. Historical accounts, not a current balance sheet."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "US and Singapore perimeter, year endedDecember31,2024; issuedJanuary29,2026. Historical accounts, not a current balance sheet.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 3,659,693; currency: USD; kind: unrecognized conditional future contribution agreements; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-fin-conditional"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports unrecognized future conditional contributions of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "date": "2024-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 817,886; currency: USD; kind: restricted net-asset stock; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-fin-restricted"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports programme-restricted net assets of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "date": "2024-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 2,293,789; currency: USD; kind: net-asset deficit; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-fin-deficit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports a consolidated net-asset deficit of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC 2024 consolidated accounts",
            "date": "2024-12-31"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "icmec-financing-dependence",
      "label": "ICMEC fundraising dependence",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Audit going-concern note links continuation to unrestricted fundraising; no particular donor directive identified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/icmec-financing-dependence",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "icmec-financing-dependence",
        "name": "ICMEC fundraising dependence",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Audit going-concern note links continuation to unrestricted fundraising; no particular donor directive identified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Audit going-concern note links continuation to unrestricted fundraising; no particular donor directive identified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Audit going-concern note links continuation to unrestricted fundraising; no particular donor directive identified.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Note7 also records management plans and signed2026 grants/contracts; this is a dated going-concern disclosure, not proof of present insolvency.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-icmec-e-going-concern"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "discloses substantial doubt and dependence on unrestricted fundraising",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC fundraising dependence",
            "date": "FY2024 accounts issued2026-01-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-fihn",
      "label": "Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w2-fli-fihn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-fihn",
        "name": "Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn is named in FLI Europe’s Swiss registration as a foundation-board member with joint signature by two. This entry uses the filed name and follows that formal governance role.",
        "structuralRole": "Board participation in a substantial related foundation",
        "significance": "The position matters because FLI Europe received a large related-entity asset transfer and has its own legal governance. A board member participates within the authority established by the foundation’s rules.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the registry establishes",
            "text": "The register records board service and two joint signatures. It does not establish unilateral grant approval, appointment of other directors or responsibility for a particular transfer. The deed and decision records would identify those powers. No additional current biography or separate campaigning role is inferred from the registry name.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-board-fihn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-board-fihn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
            "sourceName": "Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-echo",
      "label": "ECHO SA",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w2-fli-echo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-echo",
        "name": "ECHO SA",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Appointed auditor. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-echo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "appointed auditor",
            "sourceName": "ECHO SA",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "Roll-forward and authority still missing",
            "text": "Second, seek FLI Europe’s signed 2022–25 financial statements with investment and related-party schedules , plus the 30 December2022 transfer acceptance/resolution. The foundation board/finance function holds these; ECHO SA is the publicly identified transfer-era auditor. The federal supervisor is another potential holder, with access eligibility to be assessed before any official request. A voluntary holder request is available without inventing an entitlement. These distinguish an independently administered reserve from centrally appointable affiliates or legally restricted assets. None of those models requires the original donor to retain command.",
            "matched": [
              "ECHO SA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "02d40b65e215081d2de10b5d40d09baf5dfe2242f6b28ce2ad2c88dbd7cff24c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-supervisor",
      "label": "Swiss Federal Department of Home Affairs, foundation supervision",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w2-fli-supervisor",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-supervisor",
        "name": "Swiss Federal Department of Home Affairs, foundation supervision",
        "role": "Public authority",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Public authority",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No inference of government financing or policy direction What remains unestablished: No inference of government financing or policy direction",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-supervision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
                "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supervises foundation",
            "sourceName": "Swiss Federal Department of Home Affairs, foundation supervision",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "2022-07-01"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-founder-role",
      "label": "FLI Europe founder named in unrecovered deed",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Unresolved documentary role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w2-fli-founder-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-founder-role",
        "name": "FLI Europe founder named in unrecovered deed",
        "role": "Unresolved documentary role",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Unresolved documentary role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power What remains unestablished: Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-e-reservation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
                "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reserved purpose modification right mentioned",
            "sourceName": "FLI Europe founder named in unrecovered deed",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute Europe",
            "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
      "label": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "One specific output with creator-side funding disclosure; no estimate of paid reach or contract value",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Published output"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-creator-futuretense-output",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
        "name": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
        "role": "Published output",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "One specific output with creator-side funding disclosure; no estimate of paid reach or contract value",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "One specific output with creator-side funding disclosure; no estimate of paid reach or contract value"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development is a Future Tense video published on 8 May 2026. Its creator’s description acknowledges FLI, Frame Fellowship and BlueDot Impact support while stating that funders had no editorial control.",
        "structuralRole": "A public output with a creator-side funding disclosure",
        "significance": "This video brings the funding inquiry down to something audiences encounter: a named published output with an attached disclosure. It is more concrete than an announced placement or a general creator programme.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the disclosure establishes",
            "text": "Mateus De Souza’s publication names three grant supporters. The three links come from one creator statement, not three independent confirmations. The description denies funder editorial control; the corresponding agreements, amounts, payment dates and description history were not recovered. The output supports an attributed grant relationship, while leaving financial details and contractual approval rights to the relevant documents.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-output-fli",
              "w1-creator-e-output-frame",
              "w1-creator-e-output-bluedot",
              "w2-creator-published-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-output-bluedot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BlueDot Impact",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
            "sourceName": "BlueDot Impact",
            "targetName": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Future Tense publication dated 8 May 2026. Current description identifies three grant supporters and denies editorial control; description history and payment instruments not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-creator-published-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the grant-acknowledging video",
            "sourceName": "Mateus De Souza / Future Tense",
            "targetName": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "date": "Published 2026-05-08; description captured 2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-bluedot",
      "label": "BlueDot Impact",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named by creator; exact grant-making entity not established in this pass",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-creator-bluedot",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-bluedot",
        "name": "BlueDot Impact",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named by creator; exact grant-making entity not established in this pass",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named by creator; exact grant-making entity not established in this pass"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named by creator; exact grant-making entity not established in this pass",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-output-bluedot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
            "sourceName": "BlueDot Impact",
            "targetName": "The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-ltff",
      "label": "Long Term Future Fund",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named as a lead funder in Frame public FAQ; donor-side award not inspected",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Fund"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-creator-ltff",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-ltff",
        "name": "Long Term Future Fund",
        "role": "Fund",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as a lead funder in Frame public FAQ; donor-side award not inspected",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as a lead funder in Frame public FAQ; donor-side award not inspected"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Long-running EA fund whose managers announced closure and a split of its remaining balance in August 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "Closing longtermist grant fund",
        "significance": "Its spend-down connects the existing creator-funding network to two different successor arrangements.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Closure and a split of the remaining funds",
            "text": "The managers announced roughly $2.8m for existing applicants and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons, and roughly $0.9m to seed TAIF. Parikh cites operating constraints and competing opportunities among his reasons for leaving. LTFF contributions to Commons are exempt from platform and evaluator fees.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-ltff",
              "w46-e-habryka-ltff",
              "w46-e-ltff-commons",
              "w46-e-ltff-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LTFF plans to distribute up to three quarters of its remaining balance, approximately $2.8 million, to existing applications and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons. LTFF managers retain final allocation decisions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-ltff-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Planned spend-down channel; fees waived",
            "sourceName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-frame-ltff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "programme names as lead funder",
            "sourceName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LTFF announces approximately one quarter of its remaining balance as a seed grant for the new fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-ltff-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announced ~$0.9m seed allocation",
            "sourceName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The closure announcement names Habryka as a fund manager and Commons founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-ltff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oliver Habryka",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Outgoing fund manager",
            "sourceName": "Oliver Habryka",
            "targetName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Parikh announces the managers' departure and closure of the LTFF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-ltff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Caleb Parikh",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Outgoing fund manager",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "label": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named as a lead funder in Frame public FAQ; administrator and grant agreement not established here",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Fund"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-creator-aitof",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "name": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
        "role": "Fund",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as a lead funder in Frame public FAQ; administrator and grant agreement not established here",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as a lead funder in Frame public FAQ; administrator and grant agreement not established here"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A pooled AI-safety fund managed by JueYan Zhang, with publicly visible support for media and other projects.",
        "structuralRole": "A funding bridge into communications",
        "significance": "The pool links several donors with grant decisions, so a contributor’s money cannot automatically be assigned to one downstream production.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Upstream contribution and management",
            "text": "Tallinn records $786,994 to Vanguard Charitable for account A2003126, AISTOF, on 27 November 2024. Zhang’s biography describes the pooled multi-donor fund he runs.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Two visible media routes",
            "text": "Frame names AISTOF as a lead funder and asserts funder independence over selection and content. AISTOF’s public account separately records $41,162 for Trazzi’s SB-1047 documentary. Specific grants and editorial conditions must be examined separately.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              },
              {
                "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "New evidence and its limits",
            "text": "Frame recipient page reports USD 280,000 for its first cohort, plus a separate hidden-amount AISTOF record; neither reveals donor selection powers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fund’s public account records $41,162 to the SB-1047 documentary; the project dates its AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-film"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$41,162 documentary grant",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-frame-aitof"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "programme names as lead funder",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn records $786,994 via SFF to Vanguard Charitable for account A2003126, AISTOF, on 27 November 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-aitof"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$786,994 designated contribution, 2024",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The donor ledger names Vanguard Charitable as payee for the AISTOF-designated account.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-vanguard"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Vanguard Charitable",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named payee for designated account",
            "sourceName": "Vanguard Charitable",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Zhang’s public biography identifies him as running AISTOF, a pooled multi-donor fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-manager"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "JueYan Zhang",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Runs pooled fund",
            "sourceName": "JueYan Zhang",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Frame’s public FAQ names AISTOF among its lead funders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-frame"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named lead funder",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Frame reports USD 280,000 from AISTOF; Akshyae Singh says it funded Cohort 1.0.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-aistof-frame"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
                "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frame Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Frame reports USD280,000 for first cohort",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "Frame Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "A further route connects pooled grantmaking with creators. On 27 November 2024, Tallinn's ledger records $786,994 through SFF to Vanguard Charitable, designated for account A2003126, the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund. JueYan Zhang is publicly identified as running that pooled multi-donor fund. Frame's public FAQ names it as a lead funder, alongside the Long Term Future Fund. Frame describes both independent creators and an organization-amplifier track working to briefs. It also says funders have no role in fellow selection or editorial content. The grant agreement and particular downstream allocation were not obtained.",
            "matched": [
              "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "26758be8bc897ca1e50ac155b463bf02003318c4e0cbad3f9e134bfb512068f6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rational",
      "label": "Rational Animations",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Creator"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/rational",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "rational",
        "name": "Rational Animations",
        "role": "Creator",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "See dated sourced relations; no additional authority inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rational Animations is the creator/channel named in a published video collaboration acknowledged by ControlAI and the output itself. The video links ControlAI’s political-mobilisation tools, creating a concrete route from viewing content to campaign-related action.",
        "structuralRole": "A published collaboration connecting an audience with campaign tools",
        "significance": "This entry represents a creator project rather than an identified individual. Its significance is the visible combination of a video and links enabling political participation: a communications product can serve as the entrance to a wider advocacy workflow.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the collaboration establishes",
            "text": "The video identified as 0bnxF9YfyFI acknowledges ControlAI and points audiences to its tools. This supports a jointly acknowledged collaboration with a public output. The cash amount, legal contracting entity and script rights remain unresolved. Those details should not be invented, but the actual audience-to-campaign connection deserves a clear explanation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-rational-partnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Whose writing and whose editorial decisions?",
            "text": "The operator named four adaptations of Yudkowsky’s work in 2023 and described inviting him to contribute ideas in its production Discord. Alice Liu’s 2026 interview describes her own scripts and Robert Miles’s editorial role alongside other writers. No complete credit census supports saying Yudkowsky writes most of its AI-risk output.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alice Liu interview: Rational Animations writing and editing",
                "url": "https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and sponsorship",
            "text": "The EA Infrastructure Fund reported a $30,000 early award in 2021. ControlAI separately identifies the channel as a sponsored partner in 2026. Neither source establishes direct MIRI payment or Yudkowsky’s editorial control.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Specific output0bnxF9YfyFI names ControlAI and links its political-mobilization tools. Cash amount, script authority and actual contracting entity unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-rational-partnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "jointly acknowledged published video collaboration",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Rational Animations",
            "date": "Output2May2025, partner announcement3May2025; descriptions captured8Sep2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fund report describes an early $30,000 award to Rational Animations and an audience-building rationale.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-eaif-ra"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$30,000 reported 2021 award",
            "sourceName": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "targetName": "Rational Animations",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The channel operator described four adaptations and a production-Discord invitation in October 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-ra-adapts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adapts writing; invited contributions",
            "sourceName": "Rational Animations",
            "targetName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "ControlAI names Rational Animations as a paid video partner in its September 8 account.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-ca-ra"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names as sponsored partner",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Rational Animations",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "MIRI’s public action page recommends Rational Animations among several organizations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-miri-recommends-ra"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI: Take Action",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/take-action/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends for work and donations",
            "sourceName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "targetName": "Rational Animations",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rational-animations-notes",
            "title": "Rational Animations: writers, adaptations and sponsors",
            "heading": "5. MIRI recommends Rational Animations Primary: https://intelligence.org/take-action/ Current page inspected September 12, 2026; Careers and Donation Targets, plus communication advice.",
            "text": "MIRI lists Rational Animations among organizations recommended for careers/donations and as examples of work it wants more of. The list expressly does not imply full mutual agreement. It supports a public recommendation, not a MIRI grant or governance relationship.",
            "matched": [
              "Rational Animations"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3a08ee7e1432bbfedfb027165714e94bd70ac8a7b2afe0a2b6c00d10ce10ab32"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "heading": "Why this belongs in the power map",
            "text": "ControlAI connects creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. It names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner; no amount is provided. The organization’s account",
            "matched": [
              "Rational Animations"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b50d137b18e7ec9c1e3f3f13638c0ecc76fbd59f48b17f1f381b21b777034496"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "Conviction does not settle permission",
            "text": "MIRI’s own guidance calls for honesty and cautions against manipulation. It recommends Rational Animations while explicitly declining to imply agreement on everything. That belongs in this account: a claim that its public doctrine licenses any lie would contradict its stated position. Testing conduct against that position is a legitimate investigation. MIRI’s guidance",
            "matched": [
              "Rational Animations"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "bc4640f15f30592674d9dc735809f2c4db4885e0b336a3e630a1abe0c73e3774"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "A community, a book and a production channel",
            "text": "The video connection is unusually tangible. In October 2023, Rational Animations’ operator described four adaptations of Yudkowsky’s work, including The Power of Intelligence and The Hidden Complexity of Wishes . He said he had invited Yudkowsky into its production Discord to contribute ideas. That is a documented invitation and an adaptation history. It is not evidence that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel’s output. The operator’s account",
            "matched": [
              "Rational Animations"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d8e9c4097aa37d0beb54fe8aa5aa06fb26814415cdca9d489cc7b579d39e4359"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI: Take Action",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/take-action/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alice Liu interview: Rational Animations writing and editing",
            "url": "https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-peoplefirst-terms",
      "label": "People First general influencer terms, capture 8 September 2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "General proposed/applicable terms, not a recovered signed SOW or historic terms version",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Terms document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-creator-peoplefirst-terms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-peoplefirst-terms",
        "name": "People First general influencer terms, capture 8 September 2026",
        "role": "Terms document",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "General proposed/applicable terms, not a recovered signed SOW or historic terms version",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "General proposed/applicable terms, not a recovered signed SOW or historic terms version"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "General proposed/applicable terms, not a recovered signed SOW or historic terms version",
        "structuralRole": "Terms document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Terms name the corporation and offer approval, compliance and conditional payment rules. Campaign-specific SOW can override; no accepted SOW found.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-pf-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              },
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes general creator contract terms",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "People First general influencer terms, capture 8 September 2026",
            "date": "Current public version captured2026-09-08; historical applicability unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-dots",
      "label": "Dots payout provider",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Named as third-party payout provider in People First current terms; exact operating legal entity not verified",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Service"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-creator-dots",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-dots",
        "name": "Dots payout provider",
        "role": "Service",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as third-party payout provider in People First current terms; exact operating legal entity not verified",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as third-party payout provider in People First current terms; exact operating legal entity not verified"
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as third-party payout provider in People First current terms; exact operating legal entity not verified",
        "structuralRole": "Service",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "General platform mechanism only. No proof Dots processed a Protect What Is Human payment; no connection earned to the unidentified bank in the separate games-payment lane.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-creator-e-pf-dots"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "terms name payout provider",
            "sourceName": "People First Marketing, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Dots payout provider",
            "date": "Current version2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
            "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-scout-insights",
      "label": "Scout Insights",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named mystery-shopping research provider in April29 trial minutes; operational role reported by participant Melissa Stevenson.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-australia-scout-insights",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-scout-insights",
        "name": "Scout Insights",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named mystery-shopping research provider in April29 trial minutes; operational role reported by participant Melissa Stevenson.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named mystery-shopping research provider in April29 trial minutes; operational role reported by participant Melissa Stevenson."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named mystery-shopping research provider in April29 trial minutes; operational role reported by participant Melissa Stevenson.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "April29 clarification excludes employees/their children. It does not establish whether the plan changed or earlier description was wrong. Later April minutes state Scout would use its registered panel, not employees/their children; March–July minutes record responses. This remains an attributed objection, not the established achieved sample.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-scout-recruitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "said mystery shoppers would come from its registered panel",
            "sourceName": "Scout Insights",
            "targetName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "date": "Statement April29,2025, before reported fieldwork commencement."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-esafety-mou",
      "label": "Trial–eSafety MOU · original not obtained",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Reported signed boundary-setting instrument, identified in April minutes and final B.18.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-australia-esafety-mou",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-esafety-mou",
        "name": "Trial–eSafety MOU · original not obtained",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Reported signed boundary-setting instrument, identified in April minutes and final B.18.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported signed boundary-setting instrument, identified in April minutes and final B.18."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reported signed boundary-setting instrument, identified in April minutes and final B.18.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Instrument existence reported; terms, approval rights and execution date remain unavailable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-mou-signed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly signed trial impartiality boundary agreement",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "Trial–eSafety MOU · original not obtained",
            "date": "Reported signed by April29,2025; precise execution date unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
      "label": "Trial draft technical/vendor report review",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Multistage trial report review. eSafety input concerns the Draft Preliminary Report; July final-report access and Corby review intention are separate dated stages.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
        "name": "Trial draft technical/vendor report review",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Multistage trial report review. eSafety input concerns the Draft Preliminary Report; July final-report access and Corby review intention are separate dated stages.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Multistage trial report review. eSafety input concerns the Draft Preliminary Report; July final-report access and Corby review intention are separate dated stages."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Multistage trial report review. eSafety input concerns the Draft Preliminary Report; July final-report access and Corby review intention are separate dated stages.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minutes record intended technical/vendor-section review. Completion and conflict-specific limits were not established. The conflict register restricts his role to stakeholder engagement as well as excluding system testing and euCONSENT submission. The operative scope and actual work need the exclusion decision and signoffs; breach is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-corby-review-commitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
              },
              {
                "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Iain Corby",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "committed to reviewing Parts B–J for consistency",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "Trial draft technical/vendor report review",
            "date": "Commitment recorded July8,2025; not evidence of completed review."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Final report identifies regulator input; accepted changes and underlying comments are unrecovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-regulator-draft-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly provided preliminary-report feedback under the MOU",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "Trial draft technical/vendor report review",
            "date": "Draft Preliminary Report stage; feedback timing not established as July final-report review"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-protocol-revisions",
      "label": "Trial methodology and safeguard revisions",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Reported response to stakeholder feedback. Complete dated revision/approval trail remains missing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w1-australia-protocol-revisions",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-protocol-revisions",
        "name": "Trial methodology and safeguard revisions",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Reported response to stakeholder feedback. Complete dated revision/approval trail remains missing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported response to stakeholder feedback. Complete dated revision/approval trail remains missing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reported response to stakeholder feedback. Complete dated revision/approval trail remains missing.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Final table reports revisions and limits; it does not supply the before/after approved versions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w1-australia-edge-responses-reported"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
                "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported amending methodology in response to stakeholder concerns",
            "sourceName": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "targetName": "Trial methodology and safeguard revisions",
            "date": "Retrospective final-report account,2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
            "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "fli-action-research",
      "label": "Future of Life Action and Research",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Separate related organisation named in FLI cost-sharing balances.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/fli-action-research",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "fli-action-research",
        "name": "Future of Life Action and Research",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Separate related organisation named in FLI cost-sharing balances.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate related organisation named in FLI cost-sharing balances."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Future of Life Action and Research is a separate related organisation named in FLI’s 2025 audit. It appears through a shared-cost balance and overlapping board service by the person described as FLI’s executive director.",
        "structuralRole": "A related entity within shared administration",
        "significance": "The audit reveals organisational structure beneath a familiar public brand. It establishes expenses and governance links, while the entity’s specific programme and decision rights remain less developed in this corpus.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the audit records",
            "text": "At 31 December 2025 the organisation owed FLI USD2,883 for payroll and other costs paid on its behalf under cost-sharing arrangements. The audit also reports executive-director board overlap without naming the office-holder in the passage. The amount is an outstanding reimbursement balance, not a grant for a specified campaign. This organisation remains separate from the similarly named Institute and Foundation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-due-fli-action-research",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-action-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement. Financial details: value: 2,883; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-due-fli-action-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Action and Research",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "2025-12-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-action-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Action and Research",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "label": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named in 2025 standalone audit Note 6. Role bearer not identified by that passage.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/fli-ed-audit-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "name": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named in 2025 standalone audit Note 6. Role bearer not identified by that passage.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in 2025 standalone audit Note 6. Role bearer not identified by that passage."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This entry represents an office, not an identified individual: FLI’s 2025 standalone audit describes its executive director serving on the boards of seven related organisations. The cited passage does not name the person occupying the role.",
        "structuralRole": "A shared governance position across related organisations",
        "significance": "The overlap joins several legal entities through the same office-holder. Keeping the office distinct from a presumed name prevents the map from attributing historical board service to the wrong person when leadership changes.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The organisations named in the audit",
            "text": "Note 6 identifies overlapping service at FLI Europe, Future of Life Foundation, Future of Life Asia, Lightcone Foundation, Future of Life Action and Research, Wise Ancestors and Windfall Trust. It does not establish that the executive director can appoint the other boards, order every grant or override their governing instruments. Dated officer records and those instruments are needed to move from overlap to specific decision rights.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flieurope",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flfoundation",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-asia",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-lightcone",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-action-research",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-wise-ancestors",
              "w2-fli-ed-board-windfall-trust"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-flfoundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Foundation",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "fli-asia",
      "label": "Future of Life Asia",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/fli-asia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "fli-asia",
        "name": "Future of Life Asia",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-asia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Asia",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "wise-ancestors",
      "label": "Wise Ancestors",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/wise-ancestors",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "wise-ancestors",
        "name": "Wise Ancestors",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-wise-ancestors"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Wise Ancestors",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "windfall-trust",
      "label": "Windfall Trust",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/windfall-trust",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "windfall-trust",
        "name": "Windfall Trust",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as an organisation with overlapping executive board service in FLI 2025 audit Note 6; no resource transfer inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w2-fli-ed-board-windfall-trust"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
            "sourceName": "FLI executive director role in 2025 audit",
            "targetName": "Windfall Trust",
            "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
            "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-portantino",
      "label": "Anthony Portantino",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "California senator and Senate Appropriations chair in the2022 records; no current role asserted",
      "aliases": [
        "Anthony Portantino"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-portantino",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-portantino",
        "name": "Anthony Portantino",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "California senator and Senate Appropriations chair in the2022 records; no current role asserted",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "California senator and Senate Appropriations chair in the2022 records; no current role asserted"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Anthony Portantino"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anthony Portantino was a California senator and Senate Appropriations chair in the 2022 records. Beeban Kidron addressed him directly during the campaign for AB2273's child-design protections.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative recipient of advocacy over the bill's age coverage",
        "significance": "The letter places a specific contested design choice before a senator with an institutional role in the bill's path. It is evidence of a request and the advocate's account of amendment work, rather than a direction binding the legislator.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "Kidron's 3 August 2022 letter asks that under-18 coverage be retained and describes work with her team and the bill authors following feedback. It supplies the desired outcome and an attributed account of engagement; the record does not establish Portantino's response or assign him a current role.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-kidron-portantino"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Her own account of work with her team and bill authors after feedback; no authority to direct legislator or funding-source inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-kidron-portantino"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "asked to retain under-18 coverage; reported amendment work",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Anthony Portantino",
            "date": "2022-08-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "What the next holder record would change",
            "text": "The highest-value next record is the August5,2022 CapConn email to Aaron Skaggs with proposed author amendments , including attachment versions and its associated exchanges from July18 through August11. Likely holders are CapConn's engagement archive, 5Rights' policy archive and the California Senate custodian for Portantino/Appropriations records. It can distinguish who originated an amendment, who merely relayed it, and which draft survived. A substantive public reopening needs an attached correspondence release, legislative bill file or newly indexed exhibit; repeating general searches adds little.",
            "matched": [
              "Portantino"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "75125ee2d73165225ec87e04f9979df960426a165a66e89a870b085fbe60800b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders",
            "text": "The visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks' chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to Aaron Skaggs in Portantino's office , and a UK/California comparison chart goes to Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom's office includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Portantino"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d0c107afb991235fd3d78bc8247064e40f5867ef59394c03390ee28c5b56c79c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights amendment attachment: the archive route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The ordinary portal form was inspected and submitted with AB 2273, Portantino and Senate Appropriations. The first ten of 53 broad AB results and first ten of 37 broad committee results were irrelevant historical material; Portantino returned zero. These results are partial portal coverage, not an exhaustive archival holdings search or proof the attachment is absent. External indexed searches for the exact bill and Skaggs produced analyses and later litigation, not the transmitted draft.",
            "matched": [
              "Portantino"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "74bbc163ad0cbe6f5f7430b00f0ffc79a19856902239331f40dae8046d623fae"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-stern",
      "label": "Henry Stern",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "California senator addressed in Kidron August3,2022 letter; no current role asserted",
      "aliases": [
        "Henry Stern"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-stern",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-stern",
        "name": "Henry Stern",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "California senator addressed in Kidron August3,2022 letter; no current role asserted",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "California senator addressed in Kidron August3,2022 letter; no current role asserted"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Henry Stern"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Henry Stern was the California senator addressed in Beeban Kidron's 3 August 2022 AB2273 advocacy letter. The profile records that historical legislative contact.",
        "structuralRole": "Recipient of a request to preserve under-18 design protections",
        "significance": "The letter makes the scope dispute concrete: the age threshold determines which children receive the proposed protections. It also identifies Kidron's requested outcome without presuming Stern accepted it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "Kidron asked for support against lower age cutoffs and described industry pressure for under-13 or under-16 coverage. The letter did not identify the individual industry proponents, and the retained record does not establish the request's precise effect on the enacted provision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-kidron-stern"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter reports industry pressure for under13/under16 and seeks under18. Specific industry proponents unidentified; exact legislative effect not attributed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-kidron-stern"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sought support against lower age cutoffs",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Henry Stern",
            "date": "2022-08-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-mckinley",
      "label": "Shannon McKinley",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Wicks chief of staff in2022 FARA activity log; recipient of draft background-sheet exchanges",
      "aliases": [
        "Shannon McKinley"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-mckinley",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-mckinley",
        "name": "Shannon McKinley",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Wicks chief of staff in2022 FARA activity log; recipient of draft background-sheet exchanges",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Wicks chief of staff in2022 FARA activity log; recipient of draft background-sheet exchanges"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Shannon McKinley"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Shannon McKinley was Buffy Wicks's chief of staff in the 2022 Capitol Connection activity log. She is recorded as the recipient of drafts for a committee background sheet concerning AB2273.",
        "structuralRole": "Author-office staff recipient of background-document drafts",
        "significance": "The exchange identifies an early work-product route between a paid advocate and the bill author's office. It helps locate where explanatory material was circulating before later amendment negotiations, without treating staff receipt as personal review by the assemblymember.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "The log records draft exchanges on 9–10 June 2022. The actual attachments and approval replies were not acquired, leaving open whether the material was commissioned drafting, revision of existing text or simple transmission, and who cleared the final version.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-background-drafts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFp14. Actual draft attachments and approval replies not acquired. Recipient is staff; do not collapse into proof Wicks personally reviewed the draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-background-drafts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sending committee-background drafts",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Shannon McKinley",
            "date": "2022-06-09/10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders",
            "text": "The visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks' chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to Aaron Skaggs in Portantino's office , and a UK/California comparison chart goes to Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom's office includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Shannon McKinley",
              "McKinley"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d0c107afb991235fd3d78bc8247064e40f5867ef59394c03390ee28c5b56c79c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "What the next holder record would change",
            "text": "Next are the June9–10 background-sheet exchanges with McKinley and the June21 coalition-letter transmission/approval chain, held by CapConn, 5Rights and the relevant legislative office/committee record custodians. These can distinguish commissioned drafting from transmission of already-approved coalition material, and routine coordination from exercise of client release permission.",
            "matched": [
              "McKinley"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fa90d6c3e521ed9b2ffb96e245197c425e5d864cf9485ae1890db50c8fd45619"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-skaggs",
      "label": "Aaron Skaggs",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Portantino office recipient in August5,2022 log; exact title not stated",
      "aliases": [
        "Aaron Skaggs"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-skaggs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-skaggs",
        "name": "Aaron Skaggs",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Portantino office recipient in August5,2022 log; exact title not stated",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Portantino office recipient in August5,2022 log; exact title not stated"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Aaron Skaggs"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Aaron Skaggs appears in Capitol Connection's 2022 activity log as a recipient in Senator Anthony Portantino's office. The log does not supply his exact job title.",
        "structuralRole": "Staff recipient of proposed AB2273 author amendments",
        "significance": "His relevance is a dated passage of proposed legislative text into an identified office. The associated attachment would help distinguish an amendment's origin, transmission and eventual acceptance.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "The registrant reports sending Skaggs proposed author amendments on 5 August 2022. The underlying email attachment and reply are not in the retained record, so the log establishes the reported exchange rather than who wrote the changes or which survived.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-proposed-amendments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFp18. Attachment missing; originator, exact changes and acceptance unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-proposed-amendments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sending proposed author amendments",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Aaron Skaggs",
            "date": "2022-08-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "What the next holder record would change",
            "text": "The highest-value next record is the August5,2022 CapConn email to Aaron Skaggs with proposed author amendments , including attachment versions and its associated exchanges from July18 through August11. Likely holders are CapConn's engagement archive, 5Rights' policy archive and the California Senate custodian for Portantino/Appropriations records. It can distinguish who originated an amendment, who merely relayed it, and which draft survived. A substantive public reopening needs an attached correspondence release, legislative bill file or newly indexed exhibit; repeating general searches adds little.",
            "matched": [
              "Aaron Skaggs",
              "Skaggs"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "75125ee2d73165225ec87e04f9979df960426a165a66e89a870b085fbe60800b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders",
            "text": "The visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks' chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to Aaron Skaggs in Portantino's office , and a UK/California comparison chart goes to Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom's office includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Aaron Skaggs",
              "Skaggs"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d0c107afb991235fd3d78bc8247064e40f5867ef59394c03390ee28c5b56c79c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-dang",
      "label": "Eric Dang",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Senate President pro Tempore policy-unit consultant in2022 log",
      "aliases": [
        "Eric Dang"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-dang",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-dang",
        "name": "Eric Dang",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Senate President pro Tempore policy-unit consultant in2022 log",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Senate President pro Tempore policy-unit consultant in2022 log"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Eric Dang"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Eric Dang is identified in the 2022 lobbying log as a consultant in the California Senate President pro Tempore's policy unit. Capitol Connection reported sending him a comparison of the UK and California child-design codes.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy-staff recipient of a cross-jurisdiction legislative comparison",
        "significance": "The exchange shows one practical way an overseas regulatory model was presented inside a state legislature: a comparison document explaining alignment. That route concerns persuasion and policy translation; the UK code supplied no legal authority over California.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "The log dates the transmission to 5 August 2022. A separately filed AB2273/UK Age Appropriate Design Code chart provides a matching document family. The original message attachment is absent, so exact byte identity and Dang's subsequent use of the document remain unestablished.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-comparison-chart"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Logp18 and filed chart are a document-family match, not a verified byte-identical attachment match. Chart advocates cross-jurisdiction alignment; it does not confer UK legal authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-comparison-chart"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sending UK/California comparison chart",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Eric Dang",
            "date": "2022-08-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
            "heading": "4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders",
            "text": "The visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks' chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to Aaron Skaggs in Portantino's office , and a UK/California comparison chart goes to Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom's office includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Eric Dang"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d0c107afb991235fd3d78bc8247064e40f5867ef59394c03390ee28c5b56c79c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-aurre",
      "label": "Christine Aurre",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Governor Newsom deputy legislative secretary in August2022 log; earlier June entry has a different then-role and must not be projected backwards",
      "aliases": [
        "Christine Aurre"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-aurre",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-aurre",
        "name": "Christine Aurre",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Governor Newsom deputy legislative secretary in August2022 log; earlier June entry has a different then-role and must not be projected backwards",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Governor Newsom deputy legislative secretary in August2022 log; earlier June entry has a different then-role and must not be projected backwards"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Christine Aurre"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Christine Aurre is identified as Governor Gavin Newsom's deputy legislative secretary in Capitol Connection's August 2022 activity log. Her role here is tied to those dated entries.",
        "structuralRole": "Governor's-office contact for amendment summaries and opposition responses",
        "significance": "This contact extends the documented lobbying route from legislative offices into the executive's legislative staff. The log shows the subject of the communication, while leaving any resulting instruction or decision unrecorded.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented activity",
            "text": "Entries on 10, 15 and 23 August describe sharing amendment summaries and updates responding to opposition concerns. An earlier June entry gives a different role, so the August title should not be projected backward. The retained log contains activity reporting rather than a governor's approval message.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-governor-amendments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFpp18–19. Records access and activity; no approval instruction or governor decision receipt.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-governor-amendments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported sharing amendment summaries and opposition-response updates",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "Christine Aurre",
            "date": "2022-08-10/15/23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-judiciary",
      "label": "California Senate Judiciary Committee",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Official2022 committee analysis and FARA recipient entries",
      "aliases": [
        "California Senate Judiciary Committee"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-judiciary",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-judiciary",
        "name": "California Senate Judiciary Committee",
        "role": "Government body",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Official2022 committee analysis and FARA recipient entries",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official2022 committee analysis and FARA recipient entries"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "California Senate Judiciary Committee"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official2022 committee analysis and FARA recipient entries",
        "structuralRole": "Government body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDFp15 and filed June10 letter. Strong document-family match; exact email attachment/headers absent. Filing/dissemination does not establish authorship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-coalition-submission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Capitol Connection",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported submitting coalition support letter",
            "sourceName": "Capitol Connection",
            "targetName": "California Senate Judiciary Committee",
            "date": "2022-06-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-coalition-letter",
      "label": "AB2273 coalition letter · 10June2022",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Original FARA material19; document node represents advocacy prose, not a separate organisation",
      "aliases": [
        "Coalition letter2022"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-coalition-letter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-coalition-letter",
        "name": "AB2273 coalition letter · 10June2022",
        "role": "Document",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Original FARA material19; document node represents advocacy prose, not a separate organisation",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Original FARA material19; document node represents advocacy prose, not a separate organisation"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Coalition letter2022"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Original FARA material19; document node represents advocacy prose, not a separate organisation",
        "structuralRole": "Document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letterp1 and analysisp4. Four matching normalized blocks of59/47/40/34words; receipt5rights-text-comparison.json. Uptake as attributed advocacy, not endorsement or independent verification of statistics; intermediary text reuse possible.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-prose-uptake"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB2273 Assembly concurrence analysis · 30Aug2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "distinctive passages reproduced as arguments in support",
            "sourceName": "AB2273 coalition letter · 10June2022",
            "targetName": "AB2273 Assembly concurrence analysis · 30Aug2022",
            "date": "2022-06-10 letter;2022-08-30 analysis"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-concurrence-analysis",
      "label": "AB2273 Assembly concurrence analysis · 30Aug2022",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Official analysis356279; document node represents published legislative analysis",
      "aliases": [
        "Assembly analysis2022"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-5r-concurrence-analysis",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-concurrence-analysis",
        "name": "AB2273 Assembly concurrence analysis · 30Aug2022",
        "role": "Document",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Official analysis356279; document node represents published legislative analysis",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official analysis356279; document node represents published legislative analysis"
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Assembly analysis2022"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official analysis356279; document node represents published legislative analysis",
        "structuralRole": "Document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letterp1 and analysisp4. Four matching normalized blocks of59/47/40/34words; receipt5rights-text-comparison.json. Uptake as attributed advocacy, not endorsement or independent verification of statistics; intermediary text reuse possible.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-5r-e-prose-uptake"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
                "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB2273 coalition letter · 10June2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "distinctive passages reproduced as arguments in support",
            "sourceName": "AB2273 coalition letter · 10June2022",
            "targetName": "AB2273 Assembly concurrence analysis · 30Aug2022",
            "date": "2022-06-10 letter;2022-08-30 analysis"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
            "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-senior-decision",
      "label": "Oak senior funding-decision roles",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Unspecified senior foundation members receive programme-officer recommendations under the published generic process. Do not substitute Alan Parker for this role.",
      "aliases": [
        "Oak approval roles"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-senior-decision",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-senior-decision",
        "name": "Oak senior funding-decision roles",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Unspecified senior foundation members receive programme-officer recommendations under the published generic process. Do not substitute Alan Parker for this role.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unspecified senior foundation members receive programme-officer recommendations under the published generic process. Do not substitute Alan Parker for this role."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Oak approval roles"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Unspecified senior foundation members receive programme-officer recommendations under the published generic process. Do not substitute Alan Parker for this role.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Generic Oak process; named decisionmakers for 5 Rights/WeProtect were not recovered. Applicant and Oak sign a grant letter before the transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-senior-decision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "receive recommendations and approve or decline grants",
            "sourceName": "Oak senior funding-decision roles",
            "targetName": "Oak Foundation",
            "date": "Undated process guide currently linked8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "label": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Dutch legal foundation, KvK76585379. Financial/legal actor distinct from the UK company and umbrella Alliance.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect Dutch foundation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "name": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Dutch legal foundation, KvK76585379. Financial/legal actor distinct from the UK company and umbrella Alliance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dutch legal foundation, KvK76585379. Financial/legal actor distinct from the UK company and umbrella Alliance."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect Dutch foundation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance is the Dutch foundation registered under KvK 76585379. Its 2023 accounts identify a financial and governance actor distinct from both the umbrella Alliance and its UK company, which the foundation reports fully controlling and consolidating.",
        "structuralRole": "Dutch funding and control vehicle governing the UK operating company",
        "significance": "This is a concrete authority relationship backed by accounts: the UK company's annual budget and out-of-budget spending are subject to the foundation's disclosed subgrant conditions. Internal transfers must also be separated from external grants to understand the group's resources without double counting.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and budget authority",
            "text": "The accounts disclose prior written approval for UK spending outside the annual budget and possible deduction of underspend from a later grant. They report €1,520,482 of 2023 subgrant expenditure to the UK company, eliminated in consolidation, and €553,829 of recognized Oak income at group level. A Safe Futures commitment routed through Together for Girls was reduced to US$100,000; a separate US$430,000 commitment included US$300,000 rerouted instalments and US$130,000 additional support.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-nl-uk-control",
              "w3-oak-e-budget-permission",
              "w3-oak-e-underspend",
              "w3-oak-e-subgrant2023",
              "w3-oak-e-oak-income2023",
              "w3-oak-e-tfg-amendment",
              "w3-oak-e-swiss-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p17: $ 430,000 comprises the rerouted$ 300,000 plus$ 130,000 additional support. Exact legal donor/fund and payment proof missing; no Oak-to-this-instrument edge earned. Financial details: value: 430,000; currency: USD; kind: grant commitment including rerouted instalments; period: 2024-03-01 to2027-02-28",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-swiss-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Swiss Philanthropy — named grant counterparty",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports new Safe Futures grant agreement",
            "sourceName": "Swiss Philanthropy — named grant counterparty",
            "targetName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "date": "1 March 2024–28 February 2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p17: original$ 400,000 over4 years reduced to$ 100,000 when years2–4 moved to the directly named donor. Do not retain400,000 as an additional live commitment. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: amended commitment; period: original2023 grant; subsequent amendment date unspecified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-tfg-amendment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Together for Girls, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports amended Safe Futures commitment via Together for Girls",
            "sourceName": "Together for Girls, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "date": "2023 agreement amended after31 December 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p16 income under accrual policy at p12. Not proof of a same-year wire or the later 2025 award; restricted project balance is a different measure. Financial details: value: 553,829; currency: EUR; kind: recognised grant income; period: 2023 consolidated group",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-oak-income2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names Oak in consolidated recognised grant income",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "date": "Financial year 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Standalone resources-expended note p21; internal flow eliminated in group consolidation. Do not add it to external donor income as new group resources. Financial details: value: 1,520,482; currency: EUR; kind: reported subgrant expenditure; period: 2023",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-subgrant2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports 2023 subgrant contribution",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "Financial year 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Accounts p17 explicitly states full control; p10 includes the UK entity in consolidation. Does not make the umbrella membership a controlled subsidiary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-nl-uk-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports full control of its UK company",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "2023 accounts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Disclosure of 2021 subgrant terms; yearly UK budget submitted to the Stichting. Executed agreement and actual exception decisions not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-budget-permission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires prior written approval for spending outside annual budget",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Discretionary adjustment disclosed at p15, not a proved sanction or repayment event.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-underspend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may deduct underspend from a later annual grant",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
      "label": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "UK company named in the Dutch accounts; controlled entity and subgrant recipient. UK registry number not in this lane.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect UK company"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-wp-uk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
        "name": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "UK company named in the Dutch accounts; controlled entity and subgrant recipient. UK registry number not in this lane.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "UK company named in the Dutch accounts; controlled entity and subgrant recipient. UK registry number not in this lane."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect UK company"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited is the UK company identified in the Dutch foundation's 2023 accounts as fully controlled and included in consolidation. It receives a subgrant from the Stichting under disclosed budget conditions. This legal recipient is separate from the Alliance's wider membership umbrella.",
        "structuralRole": "UK operating recipient subject to foundation-level budget approval",
        "significance": "The company shows where a broad international alliance has a concrete resource and authority structure. Its funding relationship includes an annual budget, permission for exceptional spending and possible later adjustment for underspend, giving readers actual financial controls to follow instead of inferring control from membership.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Budget relationship",
            "text": "The accounts describe a 2021 subgrant agreement requiring the annual UK budget to be submitted to the Stichting and prior written approval for spending outside it. The foundation may deduct underspend from a later annual grant. Its standalone accounts report €1,520,482 of 2023 subgrant expenditure to the UK company. That internal flow is eliminated in group consolidation and is not an additional external donor contribution.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-nl-uk-control",
              "w3-oak-e-budget-permission",
              "w3-oak-e-underspend",
              "w3-oak-e-subgrant2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Standalone resources-expended note p21; internal flow eliminated in group consolidation. Do not add it to external donor income as new group resources. Financial details: value: 1,520,482; currency: EUR; kind: reported subgrant expenditure; period: 2023",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-subgrant2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports 2023 subgrant contribution",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "Financial year 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Accounts p17 explicitly states full control; p10 includes the UK entity in consolidation. Does not make the umbrella membership a controlled subsidiary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-nl-uk-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports full control of its UK company",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "2023 accounts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Disclosure of 2021 subgrant terms; yearly UK budget submitted to the Stichting. Executed agreement and actual exception decisions not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-budget-permission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires prior written approval for spending outside annual budget",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Discretionary adjustment disclosed at p15, not a proved sanction or repayment event.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-underspend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may deduct underspend from a later annual grant",
            "sourceName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WePROTECT Global Alliance Limited",
            "date": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "label": "Safe Futures Hub",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Joint initiative co-led by SVRI, Together for Girls and WeProtect; acknowledged Oak support. Not a separate incorporated entity established by this evidence.",
      "aliases": [
        "Safe Futures Hub"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "name": "Safe Futures Hub",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Joint initiative co-led by SVRI, Together for Girls and WeProtect; acknowledged Oak support. Not a separate incorporated entity established by this evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Joint initiative co-led by SVRI, Together for Girls and WeProtect; acknowledged Oak support. Not a separate incorporated entity established by this evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Safe Futures Hub"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Safe Futures Hub is a joint initiative co-led by the Sexual Violence Research Initiative, Together for Girls and WeProtect. Its publications acknowledge Oak Foundation support. It commissions and develops evidence resources about preventing childhood sexual violence; the retained record does not establish it as a separately incorporated entity.",
        "structuralRole": "Joint evidence-production initiative joining funder support with research and advocacy organizations",
        "significance": "The Hub links money and organizational capacity to particular knowledge products. Named authors, leadership credits and review acknowledgments help distinguish financing, research production and advice, allowing readers to see how a shared initiative turns resources into material that can inform policy and practice.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Outputs and contributors",
            "text": "The 2024 Building Safe Futures review names Hannah Thompson, Bridget Steffen and Timothy P. Williams as lead authors and acknowledges Oak support. The 2025 practice-based knowledge framework credits Arti Mohan and describes consultation and draft review during development from January 2024 to July 2025. Oak's Helena Duch is a Hub adviser and credited contributor to the 2024 review; she is not one of the three named direct advisory reviewers for the 2025 output.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-oak-hub",
              "w3-oak-e-hub-wp",
              "w3-oak-e-hub-svri",
              "w3-oak-e-hub-tfg",
              "w3-oak-e-review-commission",
              "w3-oak-e-guidance",
              "w3-oak-e-duch-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "pp3,9,79–80 credit authorArtiMohan, leadership, WeProtect core members and three named advisory reviewers. Helena Duch is not one of the three credited direct advisory reviewers for this output.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Practice-based knowledge — 2025 guidance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "developed Oak-supported guidance through consultation and draft review",
            "sourceName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "targetName": "Practice-based knowledge — 2025 guidance",
            "date": "2025 publication; developmentJan 2024–Jul 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p105 names lead authors Hannah Thompson,Bridget Steffen,TimothyP.Williams; WeProtect staff feature in leadership/core credits. Contract value and final approval rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-review-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned evidence review with Oak support",
            "sourceName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "targetName": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
            "date": "Published22 October 2024; current PDF captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Hub and WeProtect publications name Oak support. Amount, grant recipient and routing for each programme instrument must remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-oak-hub"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "acknowledges support for the joint initiative",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "2023 launch; current hub page captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current advisory membership; the separate 2024 credit is evidence of input into that particular output.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Helena Duch",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed on advisory group",
            "sourceName": "Helena Duch",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "Captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-hub-svri"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
            "sourceName": "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-svri",
      "label": "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and institution of the 2025 guidance author.",
      "aliases": [
        "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-svri",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-svri",
        "name": "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and institution of the 2025 guidance author.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and institution of the 2025 guidance author."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and institution of the 2025 guidance author.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-hub-svri"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
            "sourceName": "Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI)",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-together",
      "label": "Together for Girls, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and original intermediary for a grant subsequently rerouted.",
      "aliases": [
        "Together for Girls, Inc."
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-together",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-together",
        "name": "Together for Girls, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and original intermediary for a grant subsequently rerouted.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Safe Futures Hub co-lead and original intermediary for a grant subsequently rerouted."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Together for Girls, Inc."
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Together for Girls, Inc. is a co-lead of Safe Futures Hub alongside WeProtect and the Sexual Violence Research Initiative. WeProtect's Dutch accounts also identify it as the original intermediary for a Safe Futures grant commitment that was subsequently partly rerouted.",
        "structuralRole": "Joint-initiative leader and historical intermediary in a disclosed funding route",
        "significance": "The organization connects programme collaboration with an identifiable grant pathway. The amendment matters because a change in routing can make the same intended resources appear under more than one counterparty; following the revised commitment prevents treating both versions as additional live funding.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Leadership and amended commitment",
            "text": "The Hub's public account names Together for Girls as a co-lead. The Dutch foundation's accounts describe an original US$400,000 commitment over four years reduced to US$100,000 when years two through four moved to a directly named donor. The amendment occurred after 31 December 2023, with no exact date established. The original US$400,000 should therefore not remain as an additional unrevised award.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-hub-tfg",
              "w3-oak-e-tfg-amendment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p17: original$ 400,000 over4 years reduced to$ 100,000 when years2–4 moved to the directly named donor. Do not retain400,000 as an additional live commitment. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: amended commitment; period: original2023 grant; subsequent amendment date unspecified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-tfg-amendment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports amended Safe Futures commitment via Together for Girls",
            "sourceName": "Together for Girls, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "date": "2023 agreement amended after31 December 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-hub-tfg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
            "sourceName": "Together for Girls, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-swiss-philanthropy",
      "label": "Swiss Philanthropy — named grant counterparty",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Named this way in WeProtect 2023 accounts. Precise legal vehicle, hosted fund and upstream donor unresolved. Do not automatically merge with Swiss Philanthropy Foundation or Oak.",
      "aliases": [
        "Swiss Philanthropy (unresolved)"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Unidentified counterparty"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-swiss-philanthropy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-swiss-philanthropy",
        "name": "Swiss Philanthropy — named grant counterparty",
        "role": "Unidentified counterparty",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named this way in WeProtect 2023 accounts. Precise legal vehicle, hosted fund and upstream donor unresolved. Do not automatically merge with Swiss Philanthropy Foundation or Oak.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named this way in WeProtect 2023 accounts. Precise legal vehicle, hosted fund and upstream donor unresolved. Do not automatically merge with Swiss Philanthropy Foundation or Oak."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Swiss Philanthropy (unresolved)"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named this way in WeProtect 2023 accounts. Precise legal vehicle, hosted fund and upstream donor unresolved. Do not automatically merge with Swiss Philanthropy Foundation or Oak.",
        "structuralRole": "Unidentified counterparty",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p17: $ 430,000 comprises the rerouted$ 300,000 plus$ 130,000 additional support. Exact legal donor/fund and payment proof missing; no Oak-to-this-instrument edge earned. Financial details: value: 430,000; currency: USD; kind: grant commitment including rerouted instalments; period: 2024-03-01 to2027-02-28",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-swiss-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports new Safe Futures grant agreement",
            "sourceName": "Swiss Philanthropy — named grant counterparty",
            "targetName": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance",
            "date": "1 March 2024–28 February 2027"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions",
            "heading": "The operating constraint is inside WeProtect",
            "text": "Page17 also records a revealing amendment: Together for Girls' original $400,000 Safe Futures commitment became $100,000 when the remaining $300,000 moved to “Swiss Philanthropy”; the replacement $430,000 agreement added $130,000, for March2024–February2027. Do not add $400,000 and $430,000. Exact Swiss legal identity, hosted fund and upstream donor remain unestablished.",
            "matched": [
              "Swiss Philanthropy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "164c19080dbb7414119cde1705781ef72c06b860aec723419805decc657e1017"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions",
            "heading": "Custody, boundaries and merge instructions",
            "text": "Keep the existing umbrella WeProtect node. Add Dutch and UK legal actors separately; do not turn every member into a subsidiary. The new specific Policy Board is a component of the old wp-boards grouping, not an alias for both boards. Do not automatically merge “Swiss Philanthropy” with a named foundation, hosted fund or Oak. Neither the internal subgrant nor the amendment produces additional external money by being mapped twice. The already retained 2024 comparative-account mismatch remains unresolved; this lane does not invent a financial trend.",
            "matched": [
              "Swiss Philanthropy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "901328f7337dc2cac23de7a3435a193a7245109fafc7b0326f4f2b21f76ec26a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
      "label": "Helena Duch",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Oak Solutions sub-programme head; Safe Futures advisory member and credited 2024 report contributor. No evidence of unilateral editorial veto or approval of the named Oak awards.",
      "aliases": [
        "Helena Duch"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-helena-duch",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
        "name": "Helena Duch",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Oak Solutions sub-programme head; Safe Futures advisory member and credited 2024 report contributor. No evidence of unilateral editorial veto or approval of the named Oak awards.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Oak Solutions sub-programme head; Safe Futures advisory member and credited 2024 report contributor. No evidence of unilateral editorial veto or approval of the named Oak awards."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Helena Duch"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Helena Duch heads the Solutions sub-programme within Oak Foundation's Prevent Child Sexual Abuse programme in the retained official team record. Safe Futures Hub also lists her as an adviser, and its 2024 Building Safe Futures review credits her among people whose input shaped the work.",
        "structuralRole": "Named connection between a philanthropic programme and an evidence-review process",
        "significance": "Her combined roles show a funder-associated professional participating in an evidence-producing initiative. The acknowledgment is more specific than board or event proximity because it relates to an identifiable output, while still leaving the content of her individual comments and any decision rights unknown.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Professional role and review input",
            "text": "Oak's team page identifies Duch's programme role, and the Hub's about page lists her advisory membership. The 2024 review describes draft review and credits advisers and key informants, including Duch, for input. These establish professional participation and acknowledged contribution; they do not identify her as unilateral editor, holder of a publication veto or approver of the named Oak grants.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-role",
              "w3-oak-e-duch-adviser",
              "w3-oak-e-duch-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p105 names Duch among advisers/key informants whose input shaped the work. p104 describes draft review; individual comments, edits and veto rights are not supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited for input shaping the review",
            "sourceName": "Helena Duch",
            "targetName": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
            "date": "2024 review"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current advisory membership; the separate 2024 credit is evidence of input into that particular output.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
                "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed on advisory group",
            "sourceName": "Helena Duch",
            "targetName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "date": "Captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current official professional role; no named award approval inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "heads Solutions sub-programme within Prevent Child Sexual Abuse",
            "sourceName": "Helena Duch",
            "targetName": "Oak Foundation",
            "date": "Captured8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-evidence-review",
      "label": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Commissioned by Safe Futures Hub with Oak support; named authors and stakeholder draft-feedback process. Focus is low/middle-income countries and humanitarian settings.",
      "aliases": [
        "Safe Futures review2024"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-evidence-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-evidence-review",
        "name": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Commissioned by Safe Futures Hub with Oak support; named authors and stakeholder draft-feedback process. Focus is low/middle-income countries and humanitarian settings.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Commissioned by Safe Futures Hub with Oak support; named authors and stakeholder draft-feedback process. Focus is low/middle-income countries and humanitarian settings."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Safe Futures review2024"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Commissioned by Safe Futures Hub with Oak support; named authors and stakeholder draft-feedback process. Focus is low/middle-income countries and humanitarian settings.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p105 names lead authors Hannah Thompson,Bridget Steffen,TimothyP.Williams; WeProtect staff feature in leadership/core credits. Contract value and final approval rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-review-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned evidence review with Oak support",
            "sourceName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "targetName": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
            "date": "Published22 October 2024; current PDF captured8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "p105 names Duch among advisers/key informants whose input shaped the work. p104 describes draft review; individual comments, edits and veto rights are not supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-duch-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Helena Duch",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited for input shaping the review",
            "sourceName": "Helena Duch",
            "targetName": "Building Safe Futures — 2024 evidence review",
            "date": "2024 review"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-guidance",
      "label": "Practice-based knowledge — 2025 guidance",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Safe Futures Hub publication credited to Arti Mohan with institutional and named external review; practitioner guidance, not binding regulation.",
      "aliases": [
        "Practice guidance2025"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-guidance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-guidance",
        "name": "Practice-based knowledge — 2025 guidance",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Safe Futures Hub publication credited to Arti Mohan with institutional and named external review; practitioner guidance, not binding regulation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Safe Futures Hub publication credited to Arti Mohan with institutional and named external review; practitioner guidance, not binding regulation."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Practice guidance2025"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Safe Futures Hub publication credited to Arti Mohan with institutional and named external review; practitioner guidance, not binding regulation.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "pp3,9,79–80 credit authorArtiMohan, leadership, WeProtect core members and three named advisory reviewers. Helena Duch is not one of the three credited direct advisory reviewers for this output.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
                "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "developed Oak-supported guidance through consultation and draft review",
            "sourceName": "Safe Futures Hub",
            "targetName": "Practice-based knowledge — 2025 guidance",
            "date": "2025 publication; developmentJan 2024–Jul 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-economist",
      "label": "Economist Impact",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Conducted WeProtect's 2023 European survey. Commissioned research role does not establish ownership of findings by the donor.",
      "aliases": [
        "Economist Impact"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-economist",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-economist",
        "name": "Economist Impact",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Conducted WeProtect's 2023 European survey. Commissioned research role does not establish ownership of findings by the donor.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Conducted WeProtect's 2023 European survey. Commissioned research role does not establish ownership of findings by the donor."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Economist Impact"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Conducted WeProtect's 2023 European survey. Commissioned research role does not establish ownership of findings by the donor.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report pp3,7–8: questionnaire fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; study population and filtering limits recorded. Acknowledged experts are not necessarily endorsers (p20).",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-survey-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conducted retrospective survey",
            "sourceName": "Economist Impact",
            "targetName": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "date": "February–March 2023 fieldwork"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
      "label": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Retrospective survey of2,000 eighteen-year-olds in France,Germany,Netherlands,Poland; fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; used in EU policy advocacy.",
      "aliases": [
        "European survey2023"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-eu-survey",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
        "name": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Retrospective survey of2,000 eighteen-year-olds in France,Germany,Netherlands,Poland; fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; used in EU policy advocacy.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Retrospective survey of2,000 eighteen-year-olds in France,Germany,Netherlands,Poland; fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; used in EU policy advocacy."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "European survey2023"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Retrospective survey of2,000 eighteen-year-olds in France,Germany,Netherlands,Poland; fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; used in EU policy advocacy.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Accounts p6 explicitly links the research to its legislative case; review p7 describes commissioning and subsequent policymaker engagement. Provider contract and manuscript approval record not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-survey-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned research for EU-legislation advocacy",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "targetName": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "date": "PublishedJune 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "WeProtect accounts p6 reports targeted government engagement and ECLAG-letter work after publication. No causal proof of changed law or Oak earmarking for this survey.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-eu-deployment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "used by WeProtect to support legislative advocacy",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "June 2023 onward"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report pp3,7–8: questionnaire fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; study population and filtering limits recorded. Acknowledged experts are not necessarily endorsers (p20).",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-survey-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Economist Impact",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conducted retrospective survey",
            "sourceName": "Economist Impact",
            "targetName": "WeProtect European online-harms survey 2023",
            "date": "February–March 2023 fieldwork"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-policy-board",
      "label": "WeProtect Global Policy Board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Specific Policy Board component of the previously grouped wp-boards. December 2023 minutes record budget approval. Not identical to the Dutch Management Board.",
      "aliases": [
        "WeProtect Global Policy Board"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-oak-policy-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-policy-board",
        "name": "WeProtect Global Policy Board",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Specific Policy Board component of the previously grouped wp-boards. December 2023 minutes record budget approval. Not identical to the Dutch Management Board.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Specific Policy Board component of the previously grouped wp-boards. December 2023 minutes record budget approval. Not identical to the Dutch Management Board."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "WeProtect Global Policy Board"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Specific Policy Board component of the previously grouped wp-boards. December 2023 minutes record budget approval. Not identical to the Dutch Management Board.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "December 2023 public minute records actual board approval; separate from the undisclosed line-item budget or manuscript signoffs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-oak-e-budget-approved"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approved 2024 budget",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Global Policy Board",
            "targetName": "WeProtect Global Alliance",
            "date": "12–13 December 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
            "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
      "label": "Think Big",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Federal super PAC C00923417. Recipient of LTF committee contributions; filer of the March 2026 Lantern spending records. Separate from Build American AI and Public First Action.",
      "aliases": [
        "Think Big"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-opp-thinkbig",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
        "name": "Think Big",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Federal super PAC C00923417. Recipient of LTF committee contributions; filer of the March 2026 Lantern spending records. Separate from Build American AI and Public First Action.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Federal super PAC C00923417. Recipient of LTF committee contributions; filer of the March 2026 Lantern spending records. Separate from Build American AI and Public First Action."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Think Big"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Think Big 2025 year-end Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/761/202601309794859761/202601309794859761.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Think Big is a US federal super PAC registered as C00923417. It received a reported transfer from Leading the Future and filed the March 2026 records naming Lantern Production Consultants LLC for campaign and operating services, including independent expenditures opposing Alexander Bores in New York's 12th congressional district.",
        "structuralRole": "Downstream political committee commissioning reported electoral and campaign services",
        "significance": "Think Big is the intermediary where a committee transfer becomes a documented vendor relationship and candidate-specific spending. This is a traceable electoral mechanism, although the filings do not reveal the original donor's instructions, the executed vendor agreement or the political effect of the communications.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Following the transfer into filed spending",
            "text": "LTF reports a $5 million transfer on 24 February 2026, already included in its broader committee-transfer total. Think Big's amended March filing reports seven Lantern independent-expenditure rows totalling $787,404.29 against Bores, plus distinct operating rows totalling $215,037 with blank candidate fields. The operating entries cover polling, research, consulting and media production. Think Big is separate from Build American AI and Public First Action; these records do not trace a payment to a creator or connect another organisation's restricted gift to this spending.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig",
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-bores",
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-operations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Nine Schedule B line21b entries for polling, research, management/strategy consulting and media production. Candidate fields blank; some rows retain Other2025 labels. These are distinct operating rows that can be combined with Schedule E for a scoped total, but cannot all be attributed to Bores, labelled creator fees or added again to a total already containing them. Financial details: value: 215,037; currency: USD; kind: reported operating disbursements; period: 2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-operations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported operating disbursements",
            "sourceName": "Think Big",
            "targetName": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "date": "2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Seven Schedule E rows total $787,404.29, each marked oppose Bores in the NY-12 2026 primary. The form date field is disbursement or obligation; filed expenditures and stated dissemination are established, not independent bank settlement or proof of each placement. Excludes the $277,827.78 Jackson support entry. Financial details: value: 787,404.29; currency: USD; kind: reported independent expenditure, not bank-settlement proof; period: March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-bores"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported independent expenditures opposing Bores",
            "sourceName": "Think Big",
            "targetName": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "date": "March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LTF Schedule B line23 p13 reports $5m to Think Big, transaction SB23.I31388. This is part of e147 $40m aggregate, not additional outside money or a Build American AI transfer. No earmark to a specific ad or ultimate donor established. Financial details: value: 5,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported committee contribution, subset of e147; period: 2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leading the Future",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported committee contribution",
            "sourceName": "Leading the Future",
            "targetName": "Think Big",
            "date": "2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Political money needs the correct donor",
            "text": "The separately reviewed Leading the Future filings record two $25 million a16z contributions, received on 22 August 2025 and 11 February 2026. Greg and Anna Brockman's separate individual contributions are not OpenAI corporate money. A $5 million transfer to Think Big on 24 February 2026 is downstream committee money, not another outside donor contribution. Those distinctions prevent an apparent network total from counting the same money again at each stop. January filing , Q1 filing .",
            "matched": [
              "Think Big"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "009c2a54a0f9f367655814957afcb4ebbaf2d807cf0fd4f01b8b40b274d057b1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Ready for independent review. This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, an original donor's instruction, or the effect of the spending. Public records retrieved September 8, 2026. No messages, paid acquisition or publication.",
            "matched": [
              "Think Big"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8a326a9fd10c81c22c5c5fa26bfbe00a74a0df83983da9c7e648f50028dc5eab"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "The holder frontier, with rival explanations",
            "text": "Stop here: the specific next record is Think Big/Lantern's executed March agreement and invoice/placement bundle keyed to SE.4218 – SE.4224 (excluding SE.4217 ). It should identify the commissioned creative, media placement orders, actual producers and approval rights, with a subvendor ledger to reconcile net fees against pass-through costs. Think Big and Lantern are the identified holders; a publicly released station order tied to one transaction could reopen a smaller part of the route. No holder request was sent. A shell-company accusation, complete creator fee or policy-effect claim cannot replace those records.",
            "matched": [
              "Think Big"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777ae58be63a8727ab16fdb6561efae4876e45627bbab1ec1150885a2e17c535"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Think Big 2025 year-end Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/761/202601309794859761/202601309794859761.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-lantern",
      "label": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named payee in Think Big Schedule B and E. This pass identifies the filed vendor; it does not identify beneficial owners, individual workers or ultimate subvendors.",
      "aliases": [
        "Lantern"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-opp-lantern",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-lantern",
        "name": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named payee in Think Big Schedule B and E. This pass identifies the filed vendor; it does not identify beneficial owners, individual workers or ultimate subvendors.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named payee in Think Big Schedule B and E. This pass identifies the filed vendor; it does not identify beneficial owners, individual workers or ultimate subvendors."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Lantern"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC is the payee named in Think Big's March 2026 campaign-finance records for production, distribution and operating services. It is a political-services vendor in this evidence chain, distinct from the Tech Coalition's unrelated Lantern signal-sharing programme.",
        "structuralRole": "Filed vendor converting committee resources into campaign services and reported electoral communications",
        "significance": "The vendor identification moves the account beyond a general claim that AI-linked money entered politics. It shows which service provider Think Big reported paying or obligating funds to, and what categories of work were recorded. The filings do not identify ultimate producers, placement platforms or subcontractors.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Candidate-specific and operating entries",
            "text": "Seven Schedule E rows in the 20 May 2026 amendment total $787,404.29 and are marked as opposing Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. The total excludes a separate Jackson-support entry. Nine Schedule B operating rows total $215,037 for polling, research, management and strategy consulting, and media production; their candidate fields are blank. Those operating costs cannot all be attributed to Bores or described as creator fees. Filed disbursement-or-obligation entries also do not independently prove bank settlement or each media placement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-bores",
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-operations",
              "w3-opp-e-lantern-operation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Nine Schedule B line21b entries for polling, research, management/strategy consulting and media production. Candidate fields blank; some rows retain Other2025 labels. These are distinct operating rows that can be combined with Schedule E for a scoped total, but cannot all be attributed to Bores, labelled creator fees or added again to a total already containing them. Financial details: value: 215,037; currency: USD; kind: reported operating disbursements; period: 2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-operations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Think Big",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported operating disbursements",
            "sourceName": "Think Big",
            "targetName": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "date": "2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Seven Schedule E rows total $787,404.29, each marked oppose Bores in the NY-12 2026 primary. The form date field is disbursement or obligation; filed expenditures and stated dissemination are established, not independent bank settlement or proof of each placement. Excludes the $277,827.78 Jackson support entry. Financial details: value: 787,404.29; currency: USD; kind: reported independent expenditure, not bank-settlement proof; period: March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-bores"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Think Big",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported independent expenditures opposing Bores",
            "sourceName": "Think Big",
            "targetName": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "date": "March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The filing identifies Lantern as payee for the seven Bores rows. The descriptions do not identify the actual production staff, publisher, texting platform or subcontractors. This contextual edge carries no additional money.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-lantern-operation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named vendor for reported production and distribution",
            "sourceName": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "targetName": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
            "date": "Date scope stated in source"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Ready for independent review. This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, an original donor's instruction, or the effect of the spending. Public records retrieved September 8, 2026. No messages, paid acquisition or publication.",
            "matched": [
              "Lantern Production Consultants LLC"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8a326a9fd10c81c22c5c5fa26bfbe00a74a0df83983da9c7e648f50028dc5eab"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-bores",
      "label": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Target of seven March 2026 independent expenditures marked opposition in Think Big filings; federal House NY-12 primary 2026. No recipient of those expenditures.",
      "aliases": [
        "Alex Bores"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-opp-bores",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-bores",
        "name": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Target of seven March 2026 independent expenditures marked opposition in Think Big filings; federal House NY-12 primary 2026. No recipient of those expenditures.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Target of seven March 2026 independent expenditures marked opposition in Think Big filings; federal House NY-12 primary 2026. No recipient of those expenditures."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Alex Bores"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Alexander Bores is the NY-12 federal House primary candidate targeted in seven selected March 2026 independent-expenditure entries filed by Think Big. This profile identifies the subject of opposition spending, rather than a recipient of those funds or a conclusion about the election outcome.",
        "structuralRole": "Named electoral target of an itemized independent-spending operation",
        "significance": "The filing links a spending operation to a specific contest and intended direction of influence. That makes the political intervention concrete while preserving a crucial money-flow distinction: spending to oppose a candidate is expenditure by the committee and its vendors, not a payment to the candidate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the filing shows",
            "text": "Think Big's amended monthly filing marks all seven selected March Schedule E rows as opposition to Bores in the 2026 NY-12 House primary. The broader retained operation follows Think Big's vendor route through Lantern Production Consultants. These entries document purpose and reported spending activity, but do not establish ultimate subcontractors, the original donor's instructions or how many votes the operation changed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-operation-bores"
            ],
            "noteIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "All seven selected March Schedule E rows mark opposition, House NY-12, primary 2026. This is the expenditure purpose; it does not establish election effect or causation of any legislation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-operation-bores"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposed federal primary candidacy",
            "sourceName": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
            "targetName": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
            "date": "Date scope stated in source"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Named in the Alliance’s public event listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-bores-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advertised speaker",
            "sourceName": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
            "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Ready for independent review. This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, an original donor's instruction, or the effect of the spending. Public records retrieved September 8, 2026. No messages, paid acquisition or publication.",
            "matched": [
              "Alexander Bores"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8a326a9fd10c81c22c5c5fa26bfbe00a74a0df83983da9c7e648f50028dc5eab"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
            "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-march-operation",
      "label": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Seven filed digital, print, texting and cable expenditure rows, reported dissemination March 1-30, 2026. No specific creative or platform invoice was matched.",
      "aliases": [
        "March anti-Bores operation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-opp-march-operation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-march-operation",
        "name": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Seven filed digital, print, texting and cable expenditure rows, reported dissemination March 1-30, 2026. No specific creative or platform invoice was matched.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Seven filed digital, print, texting and cable expenditure rows, reported dissemination March 1-30, 2026. No specific creative or platform invoice was matched."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "March anti-Bores operation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Seven filed digital, print, texting and cable expenditure rows, reported dissemination March 1-30, 2026. No specific creative or platform invoice was matched.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The filing identifies Lantern as payee for the seven Bores rows. The descriptions do not identify the actual production staff, publisher, texting platform or subcontractors. This contextual edge carries no additional money.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-lantern-operation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named vendor for reported production and distribution",
            "sourceName": "Lantern Production Consultants LLC",
            "targetName": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
            "date": "Date scope stated in source"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "All seven selected March Schedule E rows mark opposition, House NY-12, primary 2026. This is the expenditure purpose; it does not establish election effect or causation of any legislation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-opp-e-operation-bores"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposed federal primary candidacy",
            "sourceName": "Think Big March 2026 Bores opposition operation",
            "targetName": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
            "date": "Date scope stated in source"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "ICMEC Australia",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Australian legal company ABN86645682828, ACN645682828; US audit dates loss of sole membership/control to 6 July 2023. Published July2023-labelled/March2025 constitutions describe membership and appointment rules, including a US-specific renewal exception; actual members and exact adoption history unresolved. Global Centre For Child Protection is a same-ABN business name from 3 July 2026.",
      "aliases": [
        "ICMEC Australia"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-australia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "name": "ICMEC Australia",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Australian legal company ABN86645682828, ACN645682828; US audit dates loss of sole membership/control to 6 July 2023. Published July2023-labelled/March2025 constitutions describe membership and appointment rules, including a US-specific renewal exception; actual members and exact adoption history unresolved. Global Centre For Child Protection is a same-ABN business name from 3 July 2026.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Australian legal company ABN86645682828, ACN645682828; US audit dates loss of sole membership/control to 6 July 2023. Published July2023-labelled/March2025 constitutions describe membership and appointment rules, including a US-specific renewal exception; actual members and exact adoption history unresolved. Global Centre For Child Protection is a same-ABN business name from 3 July 2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ICMEC Australia"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 17
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australian legal company ABN86645682828, ACN645682828; US audit dates loss of sole membership/control to 6 July 2023. Published July2023-labelled/March2025 constitutions describe membership and appointment rules, including a US-specific renewal exception; actual members and exact adoption history unresolved. Global Centre For Child Protection is a same-ABN business name from 3 July 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "Financial-sector resources turned into investigative data tools",
        "significance": "ICMEC Australia is important where a major funding commitment becomes a data application and financial-sector cooperation. Its governance changed over time, so present authority must be distinguished from its origins as a US affiliate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "AUD25m award; FY21 statement describes three-year grant for platform and analytical-tool design/build/deployment/maintenance. FY24 Modern Slavery Statement reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 report says six-year partnership. Exact agreement/amendment dates, cash schedule and grant rights unresolved. Same award, not additive amounts. Financial details: value: 25,000,000; currency: AUD; kind: stated multi-year grant commitment; period: FY21 describes three years; FY24 reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 describes six-year programme; operative dates unavailable",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
                "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Westpac",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "committed funding for data sharing",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "FY21 original award description; FY24 extension reported; source terms not fully reconciled"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Schedule R Part IV Australia row reports ICMEC as direct controlling entity, C CORP tax class, 100% ownership and controlled Yes. These are reported tax characterizations, not independently established continuing control after 6 July 2023. Inclusion can reflect an any-time relationship; percentage ownership uses the related entity tax-year end. Applicable Australian tax period and supporting basis remain unresolved. Original is a publisher-hosted signed public copy; IRS receipt or acceptance was not independently read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-member-e-tax-related-return"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
                "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports a related-corporation characterization of",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "2023 calendar-year return signed 6 December 2024; no inferred effective date for Australian membership rights"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Schedule R Part V Australia row is type L, USD 868,571, method FMV; D/E loan categories are No. IRS measurement can use value provided or received, whichever higher. No inference of cash direction, loan, grant, specific service or donor/project allocation. Financial details: value: 868,571; currency: USD; kind: reported fair market value transaction amount; period: 2023 tax year",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-member-e-services-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
                "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported transaction in services, membership or fundraising category with",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "US 2023 calendar-year return; individual transaction dates not disclosed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The dated programme states use is restricted to Australian soil. It separately limits the introductory session to specified Australian regulators, financial/CSE professionals, banks/remitters and child-protection law enforcement. It does not establish current licence terms, access enforcement or actual participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-local-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lighthouse",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "stated Australian-soil use restriction",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "Stated in 30 October 2024 event programme"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms assign ICMEC Australia membership/partnership determination and project guidance in collaboration with members; removal discretion applies to listed breaches. This is formal capacity, not proof of a particular exercised publication veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-coalition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI for Children",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets participation and guides projects",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "SaferAI for Children",
            "date": "Circulated January2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "US auditor report PDF3/printed2 identifies Australian period ended6July2023 and says component auditors reports furnished. Names GRF in header, not Australian component auditor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-component-received"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GRF CPAs & Advisors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports receipt of component auditor financial statements and reports for",
            "sourceName": "GRF CPAs & Advisors",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "Period ended6July2023;US audit report30January2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Charter2.1–2.3,4.2 reserves concrete approvals and management delegation. Does not prove any specified research paper or grant was approved by a named participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-board-approvals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves strategy budgets major partnerships and material programs for",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "Charter expressly adopted/effective6December2023; retrieved September2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Net asset accounting event, not payout, grant or bank transfer. Exact table and restriction-class entry on event node; no donor-specific receivable assignment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-fin-e-accounting-removal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia deconsolidation · 6July2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "balances removed from US consolidated statements",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Australia deconsolidation · 6July2023",
            "date": "2023-07-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "Who contributed, and who approved?",
            "text": "The original Nov2024 paper remains attributed to contemporary ICMEC Australia. This lane does not reinterpret its authorship using a later business-name change or retrospectively treat the international ICMEC organisation as publisher.",
            "matched": [
              "ICMEC Australia"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "85f0d25a1c719462b6320804a1dcf176787f5bbc25316d5993840022c80294ae"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Selected output: AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future , the SaferAI for Children Coalition's discussion paper publicised by ICMEC Australia on 26 November 2024. Acquisition/read: 8 September 2026 local time. This lane did not edit the canonical case. The 2025 call to action was read as a bounded comparison, not expanded into a second campaign.",
            "matched": [
              "ICMEC Australia"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f89aedefced17a7c9384dc7ce5570217437f80d4933d63ee1278d6194234992a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "ICMEC Australia's own current account says it began as an affiliate in late2021 and now operates independently, with its own governance. It also describes foundational funding ending and a search for ongoing sponsors and project support. That creates a specific renewal/dependence question. It does not establish that the Australian and international organisations have common current command. The transition instrument remains missing.",
            "matched": [
              "ICMEC Australia"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7a27f7d95c2d1821c67b367f72650acbb492850a43836ef1c857858d2658f7bf"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The new mechanism is resource support plus named advisory access to a published recommendation. Childlight Searchlight2025 Study C (PDF31–32, printed23–24) credits Westpac funding and names a committee including Westpac's Mark Dickson and ICMEC Australia's Danielle Kelly. It recommends broader financial monitoring and cross-sector sharing. This is a published recommendation, not a demonstrated detection system or bank decision. The report acknowledges panel recruitment, self-report and legal-category limitations; no base-rate calibration or operational validation was recovered in the inspected material.",
            "matched": [
              "ICMEC Australia"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4ffcce02ab71ef01c9471031ea4868986bafc801bc1f8cb52471040b7a66c2de"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings",
            "title": "Membership and US tax-return seam — 8 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "ICMEC Australia connects child-protection work with financial-sector data and investigation. Westpac committed AUD25 million to support the development of a data-sharing platform and analytical tools, and the organization operates Lighthouse alongside a financial-industry partnership with published participation rules.",
          "structuralRole": "Turning bank-supported resources into investigative data infrastructure",
          "significance": "ICMEC Australia is a concrete link between financial capital and operational capability. Its work reaches beyond advocacy into a data application and administered partnerships, making the questions of access, governance and downstream use especially important.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "ICMEC Australia is a child-protection organization with a substantial financial-sector programme. Established as an affiliate of the US International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children, it later became independently governed: the US accounts say sole membership and control ended in July 2023. That change matters when identifying who now approves strategy, partnerships and material programmes in the Australian organization.",
            "Westpac committed AUD25 million to support data sharing and the design, development, deployment and maintenance of analytical tools. Later reporting described an extension of the partnership. This is a significant instance of bank resources being directed toward continuing investigative capability. The commitment supports an organizational and technical programme, rather than merely a public awareness message.",
            "Lighthouse is the practical application at the center of that work. Published material describes searches, analytics and links involving suspected child-exploitation data for financial-services and law-enforcement workflows. A vendor account describes continuing product support and knowledge transfer intended to let ICMEC Australia sustain and extend the platform. A dated programme also describes use restricted to Australian soil. The system brings data and specialist investigation closer together across organizational boundaries.",
            "ICMEC Australia administers participation in its financial-sector coalition and helps guide projects with members. Its board charter reserves approval of strategy, budgets, major partnerships and material programmes, with delegation to management. Those powers identify the institution making decisions about the operation. Its importance in the wider network is the conversion of funding into a reusable capacity: people, partnerships and software that can help financial institutions investigate suspected exploitation and decide what action to take."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
              "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
              "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
              "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
              "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
              "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-westpac",
      "label": "Westpac",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Bank that financed the Australian data-sharing programme; recipient-specific agreement remains not obtained.",
      "aliases": [
        "Westpac"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-westpac",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-westpac",
        "name": "Westpac",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Bank that financed the Australian data-sharing programme; recipient-specific agreement remains not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Bank that financed the Australian data-sharing programme; recipient-specific agreement remains not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Westpac"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Westpac is the Australian bank funding a substantial ICMEC data-sharing partnership and separately supporting child-exploitation research. Its programme reporting connects the bank to the construction and maintenance of analytical tools, including Lighthouse, while its financial-crime professionals also appear in advisory and governance roles.",
        "structuralRole": "Bank funder connecting financial-crime operations, data infrastructure and research",
        "significance": "Westpac's resources can support both the production of evidence and systems that help financial institutions act on it. Those mechanisms should be followed separately: a programme grant, a research award, an adviser and a charity director are different relationships, each with different possible rights and accountability.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "One large commitment and a separate research award",
            "text": "Westpac describes an AUD25 million multi-year ICMEC commitment, with AUD inferred from the Australian reporting context. The FY21 statement describes three years; FY24 reports a two-year extension; the 2024 programme account describes six years. These are descriptions of the same award, not additive grants. Separately, its 2021 research-grant page places a UNSW project among $150,000 awards over up to two years. Later study material acknowledges Westpac funding, without allocating that earlier award to each output or documenting an editorial veto.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
                "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-grant",
              "w3-icmec-e-arthur-bank",
              "w5-fund-e-grant2021",
              "w5-fund-e-study-funding",
              "w5-fund-e-bank-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "AUD25m award; FY21 statement describes three-year grant for platform and analytical-tool design/build/deployment/maintenance. FY24 Modern Slavery Statement reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 report says six-year partnership. Exact agreement/amendment dates, cash schedule and grant rights unresolved. Same award, not additive amounts. Financial details: value: 25,000,000; currency: AUD; kind: stated multi-year grant commitment; period: FY21 describes three years; FY24 reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 describes six-year programme; operative dates unavailable",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
                "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "committed funding for data sharing",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "FY21 original award description; FY24 extension reported; source terms not fully reconciled"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Westpac lists the UNSW Australian Human Rights Institute project within research grants of $150,000 each over up to two years. AUD is contextual to the Australian grant programme, not an explicit currency code in this page. Not a disbursement and not an earmark from ICMEC's $25m partnership. Financial details: value: 150,000; currency: AUD; kind: announced award; period: 2021 research grant; up to two years",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-grant2021"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced research award",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report lists General Manager Financial Crime and Group MLRO role. No assumption she exercised the bank role in a specific charity decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-arthur-bank"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jodie Arthur",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "held financial-crime executive role at",
            "sourceName": "Jodie Arthur",
            "targetName": "Westpac",
            "date": "2024-25report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Study C credits Westpac funding. The later author methods account credits Westpac for the underlying survey and reports expansion to UK/US samples at no extra cost following ethical/stakeholder approval. Neither specifies how the 2021 award, later analysis costs or institutional core support were allocated; no publication right or veto established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-study-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "research funding acknowledged",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Study C identifies Mark Dickson, Executive Manager Financial Crime at Westpac, as an adviser. No claim that he exercised the bank's editorial veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-bank-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Study C advisory committee",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "executive named as adviser",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "Study C advisory committee",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return",
            "heading": "3. Survey implementation and later output budgets",
            "text": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock's 29 July2025 CrimRxiv methodology preprint , release1, reports an original design for3,000Australian men, Westpac funding, and advisory review. It says CloudResearch subsequently recruited/administered through PrimePanels after an earlier contractor declined the subject matter. This is the authors' account, not vendor correspondence or an executed service contract.",
            "matched": [
              "Westpac"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f4ef15ec90f44d2d3fb4ceeb84512eb4849f98b0e3357dcbff99e641bb7d66e7"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap",
            "heading": "The remaining obtainable records",
            "text": "The executed Westpac–ICMEC grant, FY24 extension and any novation associated with the2023 separation should identify legal grantee(s), start/end dates, drawdowns, remaining promises, reporting, permitted costs, clawback, termination and renewal rights. Likely holders are Westpac's programme/legal records custodian and the relevant ICMEC finance/legal archives. A novation is a candidate record, not a document proved to exist merely because control changed.",
            "matched": [
              "Westpac"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f28aa878a8a197bc4dafd8dd260da2e833fffe765c35e117391516e6c1bb3439"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The September 2020 Westpac response plan already promised $25 million for cross-border and cross-industry data sharing after AUSTRAC's proceedings. This amount is a precursor, not another funding flow to add. The recovered plan is bank-issued, not a court order mandating a grant. Westpac's April2026 update reports FY25 data projects supported by its funding and separately describes continued SaferAI convening; it supplies no coalition-specific allocation or editorial approval term.",
            "matched": [
              "Westpac"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2f610ace27a78ada2491bb732f461016ea4dd3b07d92d07ee7b302b887a83ef1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return",
            "heading": "Result",
            "text": "For the Westpac-supported survey, the referenced OSF registration is now readable in both original and revised form. It expressly records registration after analysis , and therefore cannot establish an analysis plan fixed before data collection. The authors' methods account explains a scope expansion and recruitment arrangement, but supplies neither the grant agreement nor a per-output budget. This improves the money map by narrowing the unresolved instrument, rather than assigning existing large amounts to later publications.",
            "matched": [
              "Westpac"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fd38b0ede43518bfea36d25daf24f72b1d30ed82c85ca099101cdd5179f5e048"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "label": "Lighthouse",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "ICMEC Australia investigative data application; data access and downstream account decisions are separate questions.",
      "aliases": [
        "Lighthouse"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Project"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
        "name": "Lighthouse",
        "role": "Project",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC Australia investigative data application; data access and downstream account decisions are separate questions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICMEC Australia investigative data application; data access and downstream account decisions are separate questions."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Lighthouse"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lighthouse is ICMEC Australia's investigative data application for searching and analysing information concerning suspected child sexual exploitation and abuse. Its reported users and intended workflows include financial services and law enforcement. It sits between incoming suspected-activity data and professionals deciding what further investigation or action is warranted.",
        "structuralRole": "Investigative data and analytics infrastructure serving financial and law-enforcement workflows",
        "significance": "Lighthouse can make dispersed signals usable to institutions with account, transaction or investigative powers. The important mechanism is that information-processing step, rather than assuming the application itself closes bank accounts. Data-provider licences, user permissions and the record linking a result to an institutional decision determine its practical reach.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Delivery, reported scale and access boundary",
            "text": "ICMEC's 2024/25 report describes ingestion of just under eight million records, including more than 70,000 geolocated to Australia. Those are records, not unique people, proven offences or closures. Kablamo reports building the production application and providing continuing support. A 30 October 2024 symposium programme states an Australian-soil use restriction and limits the introductory session to specified professional groups. A separate AUSTRAC account attributes bank closures to Operation Huntsman; no acquired record joins those closures to Lighthouse.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-lighthouse",
              "w4-lh-e-build",
              "w4-lh-e-owner",
              "w4-lh-e-feeds",
              "w4-lh-e-local-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The dated programme states use is restricted to Australian soil. It separately limits the introductory session to specified Australian regulators, financial/CSE professionals, banks/remitters and child-protection law enforcement. It does not establish current licence terms, access enforcement or actual participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-local-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "stated Australian-soil use restriction",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "Stated in 30 October 2024 event programme"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "ICMEC reports ingestion of just under eight million records in FY2024-25, including over 70,000 geolocated to Australia. These are records, not proven offences, unique people, alerts or account closures; suppliers and licence terms remain unnamed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-feeds"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lighthouse data suppliers — unnamed",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly supplied suspected-activity data",
            "sourceName": "Lighthouse data suppliers — unnamed",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "1 July 2024–30 June 2025 reported metrics"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report describes an operational application for searching suspected-CSEA data, analytics and links for financial-services and law-enforcement workflows. Data-provider contracts, user access and account-action records are not disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-lighthouse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "operates investigative data application",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "2024-25report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Delivery account identifies decision-making by an unnamed product owner. It does not identify budget approval, intelligence thresholds, bank action or policy clearance rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-owner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lighthouse product owner — unnamed delivery role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly made technical delivery decisions",
            "sourceName": "Lighthouse product owner — unnamed delivery role",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "Undated vendor delivery account"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor describes ten active build weeks and four months from onboarding to launch. Calendar dates and independent deployment acceptance are unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-build"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Kablamo",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports building the production application",
            "sourceName": "Kablamo",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "Undated vendor account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The new evidence earns a named delivery/support relationship and a dated access restriction. It does not yet earn a Lighthouse-to-account-blocking relationship. A separate documented closure operation is preserved alongside it.",
            "matched": [
              "Lighthouse"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6da4346a0c49e588deec9f75976bc368c78d923e6a8f827f1f9a13f69246fedc"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record",
            "heading": "Account closures exist in the public record — under a separately named operation",
            "text": "No recovered record joins Lighthouse to those closures. That is a missing attribution, not proof Lighthouse was uninvolved. The candidate therefore creates a separate Huntsman operation and aggregate outcome, with no Lighthouse edge. The paper's closure passage derives from the AUSTRAC publication family; it is not a second independent confirmation.",
            "matched": [
              "Lighthouse"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8c6ab8dbf7b2134048918cd20af444db4ae7112dc629869c9c5efe6c63f9cfeb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The Australian 2024-25 impact report describes operational Lighthouse searching and analytic functions for suspected child-exploitation data, with financial-sector and law-enforcement uses. It lists Jodie Arthur both as a non-executive director and a Westpac financial-crime executive. This is a resource-plus-governance connection. It does not establish donor nomination rights, her vote on any policy, or a bank action taken from an alert. Provider licences, provenance, access agreements, correction rules and de-identified alert-to-action records could distinguish those steps without seeking sensitive underlying data.",
            "matched": [
              "Lighthouse"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a27bee6c6ab665fdd1ccce0004e27566dba6d17b8285b83d1aa609901c697b8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Westpac's 2024 programme report records a $25 million six-year commitment beginning in 2021 for ICMEC data and knowledge sharing. Its Australian-project section names Lighthouse, a data application for banks and payment platforms, and Westpac participation in the SaferAI launch. The report uses both commitment and provided language; this is not a verified payment schedule. Its outcome footnotes explicitly say recipient information was not independently verified. The bank website's three-year grant description and this six-year programme description need the original agreement and amendments, not arithmetic invention. AUD is inferred from the Australian reporting context; the line itself prints only a dollar sign.",
            "matched": [
              "Lighthouse"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "24b864355dac28718a4b6be088c0ff86c5f2b2f8535ab3ed68a265a1bd543033"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-saferai",
      "label": "SaferAI for Children",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "ICMEC Australia-led AI and child-safety coalition, with published membership and participation rules.",
      "aliases": [
        "SaferAI for Children"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Coalition"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-saferai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-saferai",
        "name": "SaferAI for Children",
        "role": "Coalition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC Australia-led AI and child-safety coalition, with published membership and participation rules.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICMEC Australia-led AI and child-safety coalition, with published membership and participation rules."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "SaferAI for Children"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ICMEC Australia-led AI and child-safety coalition, with published membership and participation rules.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms assign ICMEC Australia membership/partnership determination and project guidance in collaboration with members; removal discretion applies to listed breaches. This is formal capacity, not proof of a particular exercised publication veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-coalition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets participation and guides projects",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "SaferAI for Children",
            "date": "Circulated January2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Partners can join regular discussions and contribute where appropriate without website listing or project credit, unless exceptionally agreed. Existence of the category does not identify actual participants or establish wrongdoing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-partners"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Unlisted partner category",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits contributions without public attribution",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI for Children",
            "targetName": "Unlisted partner category",
            "date": "Circulated January2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Paper p3 attributes collaborative writing to coalition members as a group. Member-specific drafting/approval not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-collective-writing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports collaborative writing with member insights",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI for Children",
            "targetName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "date": "November2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Selected output: AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future , the SaferAI for Children Coalition's discussion paper publicised by ICMEC Australia on 26 November 2024. Acquisition/read: 8 September 2026 local time. This lane did not edit the canonical case. The 2025 call to action was read as a bounded comparison, not expanded into a second campaign.",
            "matched": [
              "SaferAI for Children"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f89aedefced17a7c9384dc7ce5570217437f80d4933d63ee1278d6194234992a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-partner-category",
      "label": "Unlisted partner category",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "A permitted participation category in the published rules, not an identified person or inferred secret membership instance.",
      "aliases": [
        "Unlisted partner category"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-partner-category",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-partner-category",
        "name": "Unlisted partner category",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A permitted participation category in the published rules, not an identified person or inferred secret membership instance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "A permitted participation category in the published rules, not an identified person or inferred secret membership instance."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Unlisted partner category"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A permitted participation category in the published rules, not an identified person or inferred secret membership instance.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Partners can join regular discussions and contribute where appropriate without website listing or project credit, unless exceptionally agreed. Existence of the category does not identify actual participants or establish wrongdoing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-partners"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI for Children",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits contributions without public attribution",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI for Children",
            "targetName": "Unlisted partner category",
            "date": "Circulated January2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
      "label": "Jodie Arthur",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "2024-25 report lists Westpac financial-crime executive and ICMEC Australia non-executive director roles.",
      "aliases": [
        "Jodie Arthur"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
        "name": "Jodie Arthur",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2024-25 report lists Westpac financial-crime executive and ICMEC Australia non-executive director roles.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024-25 report lists Westpac financial-crime executive and ICMEC Australia non-executive director roles."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Jodie Arthur"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Jodie Arthur is identified in ICMEC Australia's 2024/25 report as both a non-executive director and a Westpac financial-crime executive. The public board page retained in September 2026 also lists her directorship. Her bank role is described as General Manager Financial Crime and Group Money Laundering Reporting Officer.",
        "structuralRole": "Individual bridge between a funding bank's financial-crime practice and charity governance",
        "significance": "Her experience connects the organisation's investigative-data work with the practical needs of financial institutions. The concurrent board role is a formal governance relationship, but it does not establish that Westpac owns the seat, nominated her or directed a particular charity decision through her.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The overlap and what would establish its exercise",
            "text": "The annual report and board page substantiate the two named professional roles. ICMEC Australia's published framework gives its board collective approval responsibilities and requires conflict disclosure and management. The retained material does not include Arthur's appointment instrument, a donor nomination right, a relevant conflicts entry or a recorded vote on a programme. Her presence therefore supports analysis of institutional proximity and expertise without attributing an unobserved bank instruction, policy approval or account action to her.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-arthur-bank",
              "w3-icmec-e-arthur-board",
              "w5-gov-e-arthur-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current board page also describes Westpac financial-crime executive role. External employer does not thereby obtain the board powers or a reserved appointment right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-arthur-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is publicly listed as non-executive director on",
            "sourceName": "Jodie Arthur",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "date": "Website snapshot8September2026 local; appointment interval not established"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report lists General Manager Financial Crime and Group MLRO role. No assumption she exercised the bank role in a specific charity decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-arthur-bank"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Westpac",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "held financial-crime executive role at",
            "sourceName": "Jodie Arthur",
            "targetName": "Westpac",
            "date": "2024-25report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report lists the board role; nomination rights, conflicts register and decision recusals have not been acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-arthur-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "served as non-executive director of",
            "sourceName": "Jodie Arthur",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "2024-25report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The Australian 2024-25 impact report describes operational Lighthouse searching and analytic functions for suspected child-exploitation data, with financial-sector and law-enforcement uses. It lists Jodie Arthur both as a non-executive director and a Westpac financial-crime executive. This is a resource-plus-governance connection. It does not establish donor nomination rights, her vote on any policy, or a bank action taken from an alert. Provider licences, provenance, access agreements, correction rules and de-identified alert-to-action records could distinguish those steps without seeking sensitive underlying data.",
            "matched": [
              "Jodie Arthur"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a27bee6c6ab665fdd1ccce0004e27566dba6d17b8285b83d1aa609901c697b8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-gannon",
      "label": "Colm Gannon",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "ICMEC Australia CEO and author of device-level age-assurance advocacy in May2026.",
      "aliases": [
        "Colm Gannon"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-gannon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-gannon",
        "name": "Colm Gannon",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICMEC Australia CEO and author of device-level age-assurance advocacy in May2026.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICMEC Australia CEO and author of device-level age-assurance advocacy in May2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Colm Gannon"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Colm Gannon was identified as ICMEC Australia’s chief executive in his May 2026 advocacy for device-level age assurance. He argued for age signals that could be used across services, with fewer repeated disclosures by users.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional spokesperson promoting device-based age signals",
        "significance": "Gannon links an established child-protection organisation to a specific design choice: placing age assurance at the device level. That would change where the check happens and which infrastructure supplies an age signal to many services.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What he proposed publicly",
            "text": "His published argument presents device-centred verification as a way to reduce repeated disclosure, while acknowledging implementation difficulties and circumvention. It also reports a meeting with a Mongolian government delegation. This establishes public advocacy and an attributed international contact, not an instruction to American lawmakers or a Westpac-funded device-verification contract. The useful question is how that proposal is translated into vendor arrangements, technical standards or statutory requirements.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-gannon",
              "w3-icmec-e-advocacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Argues device-level verification can supply age signals across services with less repeated disclosure, while acknowledging implementation friction and circumvention. Reports a Mongolian government delegation meeting. No Westpac earmark or US drafting instruction is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-advocacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian device-age advocacy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published device-centred age proposal",
            "sourceName": "Colm Gannon",
            "targetName": "Australian device-age advocacy",
            "date": "2026-05-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Author biography and byline identify CEO role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-gannon"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as CEO of",
            "sourceName": "Colm Gannon",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "2026-05-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Colm Gannon's 4May2026 article advocates device-centred age signals, arguing for reduced repeated disclosure, while acknowledging friction and circumvention. It reports a meeting with Mongolian parliamentarians and officials. This is actual public advocacy; third-party technical implementation claims in the article were not adopted as independent facts. No Westpac age-policy earmark or US drafting instruction was found.",
            "matched": [
              "Colm Gannon",
              "Gannon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1ec784fc5009f71ae06c1817ee268a1039892909a31d010a0bfbedbae10cff76"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-device-advocacy",
      "label": "Australian device-age advocacy",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "May2026 advocacy for device-centred age signals, described as reducing repeat verification and platform data exposure.",
      "aliases": [
        "Australian device-age advocacy"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-device-advocacy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-device-advocacy",
        "name": "Australian device-age advocacy",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "May2026 advocacy for device-centred age signals, described as reducing repeat verification and platform data exposure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "May2026 advocacy for device-centred age signals, described as reducing repeat verification and platform data exposure."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Australian device-age advocacy"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "May2026 advocacy for device-centred age signals, described as reducing repeat verification and platform data exposure.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Argues device-level verification can supply age signals across services with less repeated disclosure, while acknowledging implementation friction and circumvention. Reports a Mongolian government delegation meeting. No Westpac earmark or US drafting instruction is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-advocacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Colm Gannon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published device-centred age proposal",
            "sourceName": "Colm Gannon",
            "targetName": "Australian device-age advocacy",
            "date": "2026-05-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-jcots",
      "label": "Virginia JCOTS",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Joint Commission on Technology and Science;2024 report records presentation and subsequent draft request.",
      "aliases": [
        "Virginia JCOTS"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-jcots",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-jcots",
        "name": "Virginia JCOTS",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Joint Commission on Technology and Science;2024 report records presentation and subsequent draft request.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Joint Commission on Technology and Science;2024 report records presentation and subsequent draft request."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Virginia JCOTS"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Joint Commission on Technology and Science;2024 report records presentation and subsequent draft request.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Commission records November6 presentation and questions about shared devices and correct age entry; Cunningham acknowledged continued parental oversight.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-presentation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bob Cunningham",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "presented device-based age proposal to",
            "sourceName": "Bob Cunningham",
            "targetName": "Virginia JCOTS",
            "date": "2024-11-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-craig",
      "label": "Senator Craig",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Senator named in JCOTS December3,2024 record as requesting a device-age bill draft.",
      "aliases": [
        "Senator Craig"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-craig",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-craig",
        "name": "Senator Craig",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Senator named in JCOTS December3,2024 record as requesting a device-age bill draft.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Senator named in JCOTS December3,2024 record as requesting a device-age bill draft."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Senator Craig"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Christie New Craig is the Virginia senator identified in the Joint Commission on Technology and Science's 2024 membership roster. Its December proceedings record her request for a device-age bill draft following an ICMEC presentation, connecting her commission role to a specific legislative action.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislator converting a presented concept into a formal drafting request",
        "significance": "This is a clear step from advocacy to a governmental action. The commission's own account connects the bill concept to an earlier ICMEC presentation and records a request to legislative drafters, providing stronger evidence of agenda uptake than shared attendance or similar wording.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded action",
            "text": "At the 3 December 2024 meeting, the commission reported that Craig's concept resulted from Bob Cunningham's 6 November device-based age presentation and that she had submitted a Division of Legislative Services draft request. The original request and resulting versions were not acquired. The record establishes initiation of drafting, rather than passage of a law or authorship of every later provision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "December3 proceedings explicitly attribute the bill concept to the previous ICMEC presentation and say Craig requested a DLS draft. No enacted-law conclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Virginia device-age draft request",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted legislative drafting request",
            "sourceName": "Senator Craig",
            "targetName": "Virginia device-age draft request",
            "date": "Submitted by2024-12-03; reported at the December3 JCOTS meeting"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Virginia's JCOTS annual report records Cunningham's November6,2024 device-based age presentation and the commission's questions. Its December3 proceedings explicitly say Senator Craig's device-age bill concept resulted from that presentation and that she submitted a DLS draft request. This is an unusually clear institutional counterpart for agenda uptake. It is not proof of enacted legislation or authorship of every later provision. The original drafting request and resulting versions are highly targeted next evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Senator Craig"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3f89975bce1e96b784570fdb614348edccb267ea3824c9b5501fd35042931035"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-draft-request",
      "label": "Virginia device-age draft request",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Drafting request submitted to Division of Legislative Services, according to December3,2024 JCOTS proceedings.",
      "aliases": [
        "Virginia device-age draft request"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w3-icmec-draft-request",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-draft-request",
        "name": "Virginia device-age draft request",
        "role": "Decision",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Drafting request submitted to Division of Legislative Services, according to December3,2024 JCOTS proceedings.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Drafting request submitted to Division of Legislative Services, according to December3,2024 JCOTS proceedings."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Virginia device-age draft request"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Drafting request submitted to Division of Legislative Services, according to December3,2024 JCOTS proceedings.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "JCOTS itself records this causal connection. This closes a specific advocacy-to-drafting step; authorship of all eventual language and funding remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-uptake"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "presentation prompted drafting request",
            "sourceName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "targetName": "Virginia device-age draft request",
            "date": "November6 to December3,2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "December3 proceedings explicitly attribute the bill concept to the previous ICMEC presentation and say Craig requested a DLS draft. No enacted-law conclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w3-icmec-e-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
                "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Senator Craig",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted legislative drafting request",
            "sourceName": "Senator Craig",
            "targetName": "Virginia device-age draft request",
            "date": "Submitted by2024-12-03; reported at the December3 JCOTS meeting"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-deconsolidation",
      "label": "Australia deconsolidation · 6July2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Accounting removal of USD13,519,626 net assets from ICMEC consolidated accounts; not a cash-transfer event. Contains cash, investments, receivables and other balances.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-fin-deconsolidation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-deconsolidation",
        "name": "Australia deconsolidation · 6July2023",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Accounting removal of USD13,519,626 net assets from ICMEC consolidated accounts; not a cash-transfer event. Contains cash, investments, receivables and other balances.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Accounting removal of USD13,519,626 net assets from ICMEC consolidated accounts; not a cash-transfer event. Contains cash, investments, receivables and other balances."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Accounting removal of USD13,519,626 net assets from ICMEC consolidated accounts; not a cash-transfer event. Contains cash, investments, receivables and other balances.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Net asset accounting event, not payout, grant or bank transfer. Exact table and restriction-class entry on event node; no donor-specific receivable assignment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-fin-e-accounting-removal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "balances removed from US consolidated statements",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Australia deconsolidation · 6July2023",
            "date": "2023-07-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-paper",
      "label": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Published AI-and-child-protection recommendations; collective-writing attribution, no named final approver.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-paper",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-paper",
        "name": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published AI-and-child-protection recommendations; collective-writing attribution, no named final approver.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published AI-and-child-protection recommendations; collective-writing attribution, no named final approver."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A November 2024 discussion paper published by ICMEC Australia for the SaferAI for Children coalition. It presents AI-and-child-protection recommendations, including possible device-level detection and screening in encrypted environments, and was subsequently used in government-facing work.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition proposals entering public-sector advice",
        "significance": "This is a concrete transmission point: proposals written through a coalition appear in an independent review for Tasmania’s Premier and in an Australian regulator’s toolkit. The citations reveal selective uptake of ideas, rather than proving adoption of the coalition’s complete programme.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What later documents actually used",
            "text": "The paper credits collaborative writing by coalition members without assigning individual drafting or final approval. Its page 8 lists possible AI initiatives, including device-level detection and blocking of child sexual abuse material. The 2025 Woolcott review cites the paper and reproduces four proposed AI uses. eSafety’s March 2026 toolkit cites it specifically for investigative triage—categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying patterns. That citation does not establish that the paper originated the toolkit’s separate encryption or identity recommendations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-publication",
              "w4-pol-e-collective-writing",
              "w4-pol-e-device-ask",
              "w4-pol-e-tas-uptake",
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed28/PDF15 footnote34 supports classifiers categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying behavioural patterns. Resource listing alone is not the evidence; actual footnote supports scoped use. Other age/identity/encryption sections have separate ancestry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited to support AI investigative triage in",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "March2026 toolkit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed131/PDF132 cites paper in notes124-125, reproduces four proposed AI uses and discusses reThink. The review then develops information-sharing recommendations from multiple grounds; sole causation or device-scanning adoption not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-tas-uptake"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited and substantively used in",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "targetName": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "date": "November2025 review"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "P8 lists AI screening in encrypted environments and device-level CSAM detection/blocking among possible initiatives to support; no technical architecture, contract or deployed capability follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-device-ask"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI device/encrypted-environment detection proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends considering",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "targetName": "SaferAI device/encrypted-environment detection proposal",
            "date": "November2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Dated publisher notice links the original discussion paper.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published and promoted",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "date": "26 November2024 publisher notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Paper p3 attributes collaborative writing to coalition members as a group. Member-specific drafting/approval not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-collective-writing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI for Children",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports collaborative writing with member insights",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI for Children",
            "targetName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "date": "November2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-device-proposal",
      "label": "SaferAI device/encrypted-environment detection proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Paper p8 proposes AI detection/reporting within encrypted environments and blocking at device level. Not an age or identity signal design or implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-device-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-device-proposal",
        "name": "SaferAI device/encrypted-environment detection proposal",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Paper p8 proposes AI detection/reporting within encrypted environments and blocking at device level. Not an age or identity signal design or implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Paper p8 proposes AI detection/reporting within encrypted environments and blocking at device level. Not an age or identity signal design or implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Paper p8 proposes AI detection/reporting within encrypted environments and blocking at device level. Not an age or identity signal design or implementation.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "P8 lists AI screening in encrypted environments and device-level CSAM detection/blocking among possible initiatives to support; no technical architecture, contract or deployed capability follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-device-ask"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends considering",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "targetName": "SaferAI device/encrypted-environment detection proposal",
            "date": "November2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-tas-review",
      "label": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Independent review Part A, November2025; explicitly cites and draws on SaferAI paper in section6.3.2.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-tas-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-tas-review",
        "name": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Independent review Part A, November2025; explicitly cites and draws on SaferAI paper in section6.3.2.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Independent review Part A, November2025; explicitly cites and draws on SaferAI paper in section6.3.2."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Independent review Part A, November2025; explicitly cites and draws on SaferAI paper in section6.3.2.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed131/PDF132 cites paper in notes124-125, reproduces four proposed AI uses and discusses reThink. The review then develops information-sharing recommendations from multiple grounds; sole causation or device-scanning adoption not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-tas-uptake"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited and substantively used in",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "targetName": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "date": "November2025 review"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Cover says report to Premier Jeremy Rockliff. This is an addressee record, not a receipt or acceptance decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-addressee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Premier of Tasmania (report addressee)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is formally addressed to",
            "sourceName": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "targetName": "Premier of Tasmania (report addressee)",
            "date": "November2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Cover and foreword identify Woolcott; no allocation of particular drafting tasks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-reviewer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Peter Woolcott AO",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named independent reviewer of",
            "sourceName": "Peter Woolcott AO",
            "targetName": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "date": "November2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-woolcott",
      "label": "Peter Woolcott AO",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named independent reviewer; no assertion he drafted every cited paragraph.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-woolcott",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-woolcott",
        "name": "Peter Woolcott AO",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named independent reviewer; no assertion he drafted every cited paragraph.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named independent reviewer; no assertion he drafted every cited paragraph."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Peter Woolcott AO is the named independent reviewer responsible for the 2025 review delivered to Tasmania’s Premier. The review draws on child-protection research and coalition proposals, including the SaferAI discussion paper, when developing its analysis and recommendations.",
        "structuralRole": "Independent review translating outside proposals into advice to government",
        "significance": "Woolcott’s role gives the cited material a route into a formal government-facing review. The significant question is what the review actually carries forward: it reproduces particular AI uses and develops information-sharing recommendations, rather than adopting every proposal in its sources.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the review attributes",
            "text": "The report’s cover and foreword identify Woolcott as reviewer. Its treatment of SaferAI cites the November 2024 discussion paper, reproduces four possible AI uses and discusses reThink. The review develops its recommendations from multiple grounds. Those facts support a substantive citation pathway, without identifying Woolcott as the drafter of every paragraph or demonstrating adoption of device scanning by Tasmania.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-reviewer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Cover and foreword identify Woolcott; no allocation of particular drafting tasks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-reviewer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named independent reviewer of",
            "sourceName": "Peter Woolcott AO",
            "targetName": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "date": "November2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-premier-office",
      "label": "Premier of Tasmania (report addressee)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Report cover addresses Jeremy Rockliff as Premier. No separate transmittal receipt or acceptance of each recommendation acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Office"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-premier-office",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-premier-office",
        "name": "Premier of Tasmania (report addressee)",
        "role": "Office",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Report cover addresses Jeremy Rockliff as Premier. No separate transmittal receipt or acceptance of each recommendation acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report cover addresses Jeremy Rockliff as Premier. No separate transmittal receipt or acceptance of each recommendation acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Report cover addresses Jeremy Rockliff as Premier. No separate transmittal receipt or acceptance of each recommendation acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Office",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Cover says report to Premier Jeremy Rockliff. This is an addressee record, not a receipt or acceptance decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-addressee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
                "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is formally addressed to",
            "sourceName": "Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)",
            "targetName": "Premier of Tasmania (report addressee)",
            "date": "November2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "label": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Government regulator guidance cites the paper for AI investigative triage; not a legal instrument.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Guidance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
        "name": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
        "role": "Guidance",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Government regulator guidance cites the paper for AI investigative triage; not a legal instrument.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Government regulator guidance cites the paper for AI investigative triage; not a legal instrument."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Australian eSafety Commissioner’s March 2026 Safety by Design toolkit gives industry guidance on preventing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse. Its recommendations cover investigative AI and encrypted services, drawing on several different research sources.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulator endorsement of particular technical approaches",
        "significance": "The toolkit matters because a public authority turns research and workshop discussions into advice aimed at industry. It is guidance, rather than legislation, but its institutional weight can shape what companies treat as an expected safety practice.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Recommendations and their origins",
            "text": "The toolkit describes itself as an output of a December 2024 eSafety–US DHS workshop. Its encrypted-services case study advises considering client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based deployment and conditional limits on end-to-end encryption. A separate footnote cites the SaferAI paper for investigative triage. The DFC report supports the discussion of platform hopping and is also linked beside the homomorphic-encryption item. Those are distinct citation relationships: neither establishes the efficacy of every technique nor identifies who drafted or approved the full recommendation list.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-toolkit-publisher",
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-citation",
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-encryption",
              "w5-enc-e-fn29",
              "w5-enc-e-fn26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed24/PDF13 case study lists client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based E2EE deployment and conditional limits on E2EE. This is an affirmative guidance recommendation. Source efficacy/privacy assurances remain attributed; the SaferAI citation elsewhere does not establish origin of these recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-encryption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety encrypted-service recommendations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advises industry to consider",
            "sourceName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "targetName": "eSafety encrypted-service recommendations",
            "date": "Toolkit version displayed4March2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed28/PDF15 footnote34 supports classifiers categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying behavioural patterns. Resource listing alone is not the evidence; actual footnote supports scoped use. Other age/identity/encryption sections have separate ancestry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
                "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited to support AI investigative triage in",
            "sourceName": "SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "March2026 toolkit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Footnote29 follows the second item only; report/metadata do not identify Security and Safety vol4 as publication. This is citation placement, not verified technical support or authorship of the list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-fn29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is linked by footnote29 beside homomorphic-encryption guidance in",
            "sourceName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote access30Jan2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Toolkit describes itself as output of a December2024 eSafety/DHS workshop; paper citation accessed November2025. Do not infer the citation was present at that earlier workshop.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-toolkit-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes guidance in",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "Version label4March2026; citation access26November2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report p34 matches toolkit claim about movement to encrypted messaging. This separately supported contextual citation does not establish the homomorphic recommendation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-fn26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited at footnote26 for platform-hopping context in",
            "sourceName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote26 access10Jan2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-jago",
      "label": "Mikaela Jago",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named in original paper/call PDF metadata; 2024-25 institutional report lists Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. Production metadata does not prove prose authorship or approval.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-jago",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-jago",
        "name": "Mikaela Jago",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named in original paper/call PDF metadata; 2024-25 institutional report lists Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. Production metadata does not prove prose authorship or approval.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in original paper/call PDF metadata; 2024-25 institutional report lists Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. Production metadata does not prove prose authorship or approval."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "A national call to action: Prioritising child safety in the age of AI",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/A-national-call-to-action-Prioritising-child-safety-in-the-age-of-AI-ICMEC-Australia-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mikaela Jago is listed in ICMEC Australia’s 2024–25 impact report as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. Her name also appears in production metadata associated with the SaferAI discussion paper and call, making her a potential lead for understanding how those publications were prepared.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisational capacity work and a publication-production lead",
        "significance": "Jago is relevant to the practical work behind coalition publications: assembling and producing a document can be separate from approving its policy. Her role is more useful as a route to production records than as a presumed author of its proposals.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role and attribution",
            "text": "The institutional staff panel supplies the named coordination role. The original PDFs supply the metadata lead. A document-author metadata field may identify the account or software workflow that produced a file; it does not by itself prove prose authorship or final approval. No such approval authority is established for Jago in the retained record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-jago-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2024-25 impact report printed35/PDF18 staff panel. This contemporary role makes a plausible production-record custodian, but does not prove 2024 writing/approval authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-jago-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is listed as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator by",
            "sourceName": "Mikaela Jago",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "2024-25 report, published2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "Who contributed, and who approved?",
            "text": "One useful production lead is embedded in the acquired original: the PDF Author metadata names Mikaela Jago , with Canva as creator/producer. The 2025 call PDF contains the same metadata name. The retained ICMEC Australia 2024-25 impact report, printed p35/PDF18, separately lists Jago as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. The name is therefore attached both to an institutional role and these document-production records. That still does not establish who drafted a particular passage, whether the field reflects design/export rather than prose, or who approved publication. The candidate deliberately has no “Jago authored/approved paper” edge.",
            "matched": [
              "Mikaela Jago"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "bcfdc2a0959bc9a86180d217ef973a0b788944b65ad28ed6c91dd300cae6d324"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "A national call to action: Prioritising child safety in the age of AI",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/A-national-call-to-action-Prioritising-child-safety-in-the-age-of-AI-ICMEC-Australia-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-kablamo",
      "label": "Kablamo",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Lighthouse delivery and support vendor as described by its own case study; contracting legal entity unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-kablamo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-kablamo",
        "name": "Kablamo",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Lighthouse delivery and support vendor as described by its own case study; contracting legal entity unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Lighthouse delivery and support vendor as described by its own case study; contracting legal entity unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Kablamo is the vendor that describes building and supporting ICMEC Australia's Lighthouse application. Its case study provides a delivery narrative from onboarding through launch and ongoing care, including an effort to transfer knowledge so the client could sustain and extend the platform.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical delivery and maintenance supplier for Lighthouse",
        "significance": "The vendor's work is the implementation bridge between a funded data-sharing objective and an application people can use. Continuing support also creates a practical resource dependency through patching and incident response. That delivery relationship does not establish ownership of intelligence criteria or authority over a bank's account decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Build and continuing support",
            "text": "Kablamo reports ten active build weeks and four months from onboarding to launch, without calendar dates or independent acceptance records. It also describes annually renewed Product Care support after launch and a twelve-month knowledge-transfer programme. The acquired record supplies no signed renewal, payment amount or verified contracting legal entity. Westpac's stated funding purpose includes platform construction and maintenance, but no recovered expense line allocates a particular part of that grant to Kablamo.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-build",
              "w4-lh-e-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Vendor reports annually renewed support after launch, including patching and incident response. No amount, payment or signed renewal instrument recovered. The same vendor describes a twelve-month knowledge-transfer programme intended to let ICMEC sustain and extend the platform independently; this also remains vendor-attributed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly engaged ongoing Product Care support",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Kablamo",
            "date": "Post-launch; calendar dates unavailable"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Vendor describes ten active build weeks and four months from onboarding to launch. Calendar dates and independent deployment acceptance are unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-build"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lighthouse",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports building the production application",
            "sourceName": "Kablamo",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "Undated vendor account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap",
            "heading": "Where this does and does not reach operating capacity",
            "text": "The bank's stated grant purpose now explicitly reaches platform construction and maintenance. It does not identify Kablamo, a licence, a hosting charge, a software-capitalisation balance or a SaferAI policy allocation. No identifiable Lighthouse/Kablamo expense line was recovered in the acquired financial statements. The USD20,699 fixed-asset balance at deconsolidation cannot be renamed Lighthouse software. Later Australian operating expenses are outside the US consolidation perimeter.",
            "matched": [
              "Kablamo"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0c66d7b306773441bf8b02e107ffc586ad05a89a1f0b4d337624cf7cf54bfba8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-product-owner",
      "label": "Lighthouse product owner — unnamed delivery role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "An ICMEC delivery role described by the vendor, not an identified person or a demonstrated financial/policy decision-maker.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-product-owner",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-product-owner",
        "name": "Lighthouse product owner — unnamed delivery role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An ICMEC delivery role described by the vendor, not an identified person or a demonstrated financial/policy decision-maker.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "An ICMEC delivery role described by the vendor, not an identified person or a demonstrated financial/policy decision-maker."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An ICMEC delivery role described by the vendor, not an identified person or a demonstrated financial/policy decision-maker.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Delivery account identifies decision-making by an unnamed product owner. It does not identify budget approval, intelligence thresholds, bank action or policy clearance rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-owner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
                "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lighthouse",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly made technical delivery decisions",
            "sourceName": "Lighthouse product owner — unnamed delivery role",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "Undated vendor delivery account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-data-suppliers",
      "label": "Lighthouse data suppliers — unnamed",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Provider category reported by ICMEC; no named feed supplier, licence counterparty or dataset ownership inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-data-suppliers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-data-suppliers",
        "name": "Lighthouse data suppliers — unnamed",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Provider category reported by ICMEC; no named feed supplier, licence counterparty or dataset ownership inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Provider category reported by ICMEC; no named feed supplier, licence counterparty or dataset ownership inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Provider category reported by ICMEC; no named feed supplier, licence counterparty or dataset ownership inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "ICMEC reports ingestion of just under eight million records in FY2024-25, including over 70,000 geolocated to Australia. These are records, not proven offences, unique people, alerts or account closures; suppliers and licence terms remain unnamed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-feeds"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lighthouse",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly supplied suspected-activity data",
            "sourceName": "Lighthouse data suppliers — unnamed",
            "targetName": "Lighthouse",
            "date": "1 July 2024–30 June 2025 reported metrics"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-austrac",
      "label": "AUSTRAC",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Australian financial intelligence agency; named joint participant in Operation Huntsman.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-austrac",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-austrac",
        "name": "AUSTRAC",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Australian financial intelligence agency; named joint participant in Operation Huntsman.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Australian financial intelligence agency; named joint participant in Operation Huntsman."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australian financial intelligence agency; named joint participant in Operation Huntsman.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "AUSTRAC identifies Operation Huntsman as a joint ACCCE–AUSTRAC initiative. No recovered record connects this operation to Lighthouse.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-austrac"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Huntsman",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
            "sourceName": "AUSTRAC",
            "targetName": "Operation Huntsman",
            "date": "15 September 2025 published account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The September 2020 Westpac response plan already promised $25 million for cross-border and cross-industry data sharing after AUSTRAC's proceedings. This amount is a precursor, not another funding flow to add. The recovered plan is bank-issued, not a court order mandating a grant. Westpac's April2026 update reports FY25 data projects supported by its funding and separately describes continued SaferAI convening; it supplies no coalition-specific allocation or editorial approval term.",
            "matched": [
              "AUSTRAC"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2f610ace27a78ada2491bb732f461016ea4dd3b07d92d07ee7b302b887a83ef1"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-accce",
      "label": "Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named joint participant in Operation Huntsman. The AUSTRAC page expands the acronym with an additional word Sexual; the programme uses the standard name shown here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-accce",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-accce",
        "name": "Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named joint participant in Operation Huntsman. The AUSTRAC page expands the acronym with an additional word Sexual; the programme uses the standard name shown here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named joint participant in Operation Huntsman. The AUSTRAC page expands the acronym with an additional word Sexual; the programme uses the standard name shown here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named joint participant in Operation Huntsman. The AUSTRAC page expands the acronym with an additional word Sexual; the programme uses the standard name shown here.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ACCCE is the other named initiative participant; this is not a statement about Lighthouse access or data supply.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-accce"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Huntsman",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
            "sourceName": "Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE)",
            "targetName": "Operation Huntsman",
            "date": "15 September 2025 published account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-huntsman",
      "label": "Operation Huntsman",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Separate joint ACCCE-AUSTRAC initiative, reported by AUSTRAC as operating since June 2022. No recovered Lighthouse join.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-huntsman",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-huntsman",
        "name": "Operation Huntsman",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Separate joint ACCCE-AUSTRAC initiative, reported by AUSTRAC as operating since June 2022. No recovered Lighthouse join.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate joint ACCCE-AUSTRAC initiative, reported by AUSTRAC as operating since June 2022. No recovered Lighthouse join."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Operation Huntsman is a joint initiative of AUSTRAC and the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation. AUSTRAC's September 2025 account describes it as operating since June 2022 and links it to closures of Australian bank accounts associated with sextortion payments.",
        "structuralRole": "Named agency initiative connecting financial intelligence to reported bank-account closures",
        "significance": "Huntsman supplies a documented operational outcome in a field where many other records describe tools, partnerships or potential capabilities. It identifies the initiative to which the public authority attributes closures, preventing a nearby data platform or funder from inheriting credit or responsibility without a connecting record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The reported outcome and its attribution",
            "text": "On 15 September 2025, AUSTRAC reported that more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments had been closed since June 2022. This is an agency-reported cumulative aggregate, not an acquired account-level ledger. The statement names AUSTRAC and the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation as joint participants. No retained source links this operation or those closures to Lighthouse; that absence limits attribution rather than proving the application played no part.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-austrac",
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-accce",
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-closures"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "AUSTRAC identifies Operation Huntsman as a joint ACCCE–AUSTRAC initiative. No recovered record connects this operation to Lighthouse.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-austrac"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AUSTRAC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
            "sourceName": "AUSTRAC",
            "targetName": "Operation Huntsman",
            "date": "15 September 2025 published account"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ACCCE is the other named initiative participant; this is not a statement about Lighthouse access or data supply.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-accce"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
            "sourceName": "Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE)",
            "targetName": "Operation Huntsman",
            "date": "15 September 2025 published account"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "AUSTRAC reports more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments closed since June 2022. It is an agency-reported aggregate, not an audited account ledger. No recovered Lighthouse attribution; absence of that attribution does not prove non-involvement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-closures"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Huntsman bank-account closures — reported aggregate",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly led to bank-account closures",
            "sourceName": "Operation Huntsman",
            "targetName": "Huntsman bank-account closures — reported aggregate",
            "date": "Cumulative since June 2022; reported 15 September 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-huntsman-closures",
      "label": "Huntsman bank-account closures — reported aggregate",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "More than 3,000 Australian accounts linked to sextortion payments, as reported on 15 September 2025; no individual account identifiers acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-lh-huntsman-closures",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-huntsman-closures",
        "name": "Huntsman bank-account closures — reported aggregate",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "More than 3,000 Australian accounts linked to sextortion payments, as reported on 15 September 2025; no individual account identifiers acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "More than 3,000 Australian accounts linked to sextortion payments, as reported on 15 September 2025; no individual account identifiers acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "More than 3,000 Australian accounts linked to sextortion payments, as reported on 15 September 2025; no individual account identifiers acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "AUSTRAC reports more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments closed since June 2022. It is an agency-reported aggregate, not an audited account ledger. No recovered Lighthouse attribution; absence of that attribution does not prove non-involvement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-lh-e-huntsman-closures"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
                "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Huntsman",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly led to bank-account closures",
            "sourceName": "Operation Huntsman",
            "targetName": "Huntsman bank-account closures — reported aggregate",
            "date": "Cumulative since June 2022; reported 15 September 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-esafety-encryption-guidance",
      "label": "eSafety encrypted-service recommendations",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Toolkit asks industry to consider client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based encryption deployment and conditional restrictions. Published guidance, not proof of technical efficacy, legal compulsion or deployment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w4-pol-esafety-encryption-guidance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-esafety-encryption-guidance",
        "name": "eSafety encrypted-service recommendations",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Toolkit asks industry to consider client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based encryption deployment and conditional restrictions. Published guidance, not proof of technical efficacy, legal compulsion or deployment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Toolkit asks industry to consider client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based encryption deployment and conditional restrictions. Published guidance, not proof of technical efficacy, legal compulsion or deployment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Toolkit asks industry to consider client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based encryption deployment and conditional restrictions. Published guidance, not proof of technical efficacy, legal compulsion or deployment.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed24/PDF13 case study lists client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based E2EE deployment and conditional limits on E2EE. This is an affirmative guidance recommendation. Source efficacy/privacy assurances remain attributed; the SaferAI citation elsewhere does not establish origin of these recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w4-pol-e-esafety-encryption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advises industry to consider",
            "sourceName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "targetName": "eSafety encrypted-service recommendations",
            "date": "Toolkit version displayed4March2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-au-members",
      "label": "ICMEC Australia company members",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Legal voting membership; actual names and change dates not recovered. Distinct from portal users, donors or SaferAI coalition members.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-gov-au-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-au-members",
        "name": "ICMEC Australia company members",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Legal voting membership; actual names and change dates not recovered. Distinct from portal users, donors or SaferAI coalition members.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Legal voting membership; actual names and change dates not recovered. Distinct from portal users, donors or SaferAI coalition members."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Legal voting membership; actual names and change dates not recovered. Distinct from portal users, donors or SaferAI coalition members.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Clauses10 and58 assign membership register and company meeting/resolution records to secretary. Names and institutional role dates are the relevant requested extract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-member-register"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "maintains register of",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "One vote per member(cl33); member election(cl40) and removal(cl42); board also has specified vacancy-filling powers. No actual member list recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-election"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "elects and may remove directors of",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Clauses13–14: board approves applicants and secretary enters approved names; membership starts on register entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-admission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "decides admission applications to",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-au-board",
      "label": "ICMEC Australia board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Published approval body for strategy, budgets, major partnerships and material programs; specific exercised decisions unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-gov-au-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-au-board",
        "name": "ICMEC Australia board",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published approval body for strategy, budgets, major partnerships and material programs; specific exercised decisions unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published approval body for strategy, budgets, major partnerships and material programs; specific exercised decisions unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The ICMEC Australia board is the organisation's governing body under its constitution and board charter. The published framework assigns it concrete approval responsibilities for strategy, budgets, major partnerships and material programmes, alongside management delegation and oversight of conflicts of interest.",
        "structuralRole": "Corporate approval body governing resources, partnerships and major programmes",
        "significance": "The board is where an organisation's external funding and professional relationships meet formal decision rights. Those rights attach to directors collectively under the governing documents. A director's employer or a donor does not acquire them merely through an affiliation, so the board provides a precise place to investigate actual approvals.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Membership, appointment and conflict rules",
            "text": "The constitution provides for board approval of membership applications, with membership beginning on entry in the register. Members have one vote each and elect or may remove directors; the board has specified vacancy-filling powers. The charter expressly took effect on 6 December 2023. Conflict rules require disclosure, recording and recusal subject to stated exceptions. The current public list includes Jodie Arthur, also described as a Westpac financial-crime executive. The retained record does not include the membership register, her nomination rights or minutes of particular programme decisions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-admission",
              "w5-gov-e-election",
              "w5-gov-e-board-approvals",
              "w5-gov-e-conflict-records",
              "w5-gov-e-arthur-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current board page also describes Westpac financial-crime executive role. External employer does not thereby obtain the board powers or a reserved appointment right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-arthur-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jodie Arthur",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is publicly listed as non-executive director on",
            "sourceName": "Jodie Arthur",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "date": "Website snapshot8September2026 local; appointment interval not established"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Charter2.1–2.3,4.2 reserves concrete approvals and management delegation. Does not prove any specified research paper or grant was approved by a named participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-board-approvals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves strategy budgets major partnerships and material programs for",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "Charter expressly adopted/effective6December2023; retrieved September2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy5.2–6.2 and Constitution50: disclosure/recording and recusal rules including exceptions. Not evidence any particular conflict was declared or managed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-conflict-records"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "maintains interests register and recorded conflict decisions for",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "date": "Published policy metadata Approved May23; March2025 constitution; actual compliance unobserved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "One vote per member(cl33); member election(cl40) and removal(cl42); board also has specified vacancy-filling powers. No actual member list recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-election"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "elects and may remove directors of",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Clauses13–14: board approves applicants and secretary enters approved names; membership starts on register entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-admission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "decides admission applications to",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-au-secretary",
      "label": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named role holding membership/minute and interests registers; individual incumbent not established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-gov-au-secretary",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-au-secretary",
        "name": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named role holding membership/minute and interests registers; individual incumbent not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named role holding membership/minute and interests registers; individual incumbent not established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named role holding membership/minute and interests registers; individual incumbent not established.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Clauses10 and58 assign membership register and company meeting/resolution records to secretary. Names and institutional role dates are the relevant requested extract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-member-register"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "maintains register of",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia company members",
            "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy5.2–6.2 and Constitution50: disclosure/recording and recusal rules including exceptions. Not evidence any particular conflict was declared or managed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-conflict-records"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "maintains interests register and recorded conflict decisions for",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia company secretary",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia board",
            "date": "Published policy metadata Approved May23; March2025 constitution; actual compliance unobserved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-constitution",
      "label": "ICMEC Australia published constitutions",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "July2023-labeled and March2025 texts preserve a US-specific membership-renewal exception. Actual adoption resolutions and member register not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-gov-constitution",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-constitution",
        "name": "ICMEC Australia published constitutions",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "July2023-labeled and March2025 texts preserve a US-specific membership-renewal exception. Actual adoption resolutions and member register not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "July2023-labeled and March2025 texts preserve a US-specific membership-renewal exception. Actual adoption resolutions and member register not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "July2023-labeled and March2025 texts preserve a US-specific membership-renewal exception. Actual adoption resolutions and member register not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Clause15.2 specifically names ICMEC US. Establishes a constitutional exception, not actual membership, voting exercise or control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-us-renewal-exception"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
                "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "exempts from membership renewal",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia published constitutions",
            "targetName": "International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (US)",
            "date": "July2023-labeled text and March2025 text; exact adoption dates unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-grf",
      "label": "GRF CPAs & Advisors",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "US consolidating auditor; report header identifies GRF and its receipt of Australian component auditor reports. Australian auditor identity unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-gov-grf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-grf",
        "name": "GRF CPAs & Advisors",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "US consolidating auditor; report header identifies GRF and its receipt of Australian component auditor reports. Australian auditor identity unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "US consolidating auditor; report header identifies GRF and its receipt of Australian component auditor reports. Australian auditor identity unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "US consolidating auditor; report header identifies GRF and its receipt of Australian component auditor reports. Australian auditor identity unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "US auditor report PDF3/printed2 identifies Australian period ended6July2023 and says component auditors reports furnished. Names GRF in header, not Australian component auditor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-gov-e-component-received"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
                "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports receipt of component auditor financial statements and reports for",
            "sourceName": "GRF CPAs & Advisors",
            "targetName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "date": "Period ended6July2023;US audit report30January2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified",
            "heading": "The auditor and record holders are more precise",
            "text": "The already retained US2023 audit, PDF3/printed2, bears GRF CPAs & Advisors , grfcpa.com, and says the Australian component auditor's statements/reports for the period ended6July2023 were furnished to it. That makes GRF a specifically evidenced recipient of the underlying report. It does not name the Australian auditor. The US audit remains a USD consolidated disclosure; no new cash transfer or Australian expense allocation is inferred.",
            "matched": [
              "GRF CPAs & Advisors"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3b73f88aaaca99a756187f48d08d7b3dfc69c169a75d9f74ed2bb70cebc22d91"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
            "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "61-page DFC technical report; cited by eSafety footnotes26 and29. Scoped reading, not whole-report technical audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-paper",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-paper",
        "name": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "61-page DFC technical report; cited by eSafety footnotes26 and29. Scoped reading, not whole-report technical audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "61-page DFC technical report; cited by eSafety footnotes26 and29. Scoped reading, not whole-report technical audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A December 2024 research report on technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse, published through Digital Futures for Children, the LSE–5Rights centre. It is a deliverable of the Toolbox measurement project and later appears in Australian eSafety guidance.",
        "structuralRole": "Research carried into regulatory guidance",
        "significance": "This report connects research production to the authority of a government toolkit. Its importance lies in which propositions the regulator borrowed: a well-supported citation about movement between platforms and a separate citation beside encryption guidance need different technical scrutiny.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the citation trail establishes",
            "text": "The 61-page report is Work Package 3 of the Toolbox project. Six named authors produced it, with independent reviewers acknowledged separately. eSafety’s March 2026 toolkit cites its discussion of movement to encrypted messaging at footnote 26. Footnote 29 appears beside a homomorphic-encryption recommendation, but citation placement alone does not demonstrate that the report validates that technique or originated the toolkit’s full list of encryption recommendations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-workpackage",
              "w5-enc-e-publisher",
              "w5-enc-e-author-spuy",
              "w5-enc-e-author-witting",
              "w5-enc-e-author-burton",
              "w5-enc-e-author-day",
              "w5-enc-e-author-livingstone",
              "w5-enc-e-author-sylwander",
              "w5-enc-e-review",
              "w5-enc-e-fn29",
              "w5-enc-e-fn26",
              "w5-fund-e-salter-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Footnote29 follows the second item only; report/metadata do not identify Security and Safety vol4 as publication. This is citation placement, not verified technical support or authorship of the list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-fn29"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is linked by footnote29 beside homomorphic-encryption guidance in",
            "sourceName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote access30Jan2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report p34 matches toolkit claim about movement to encrypted messaging. This separately supported contextual citation does not establish the homomorphic recommendation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-fn26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited at footnote26 for platform-hopping context in",
            "sourceName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "targetName": "eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)",
            "date": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote26 access10Jan2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "DFC December2024 report p5 identifies Michael Salter of Childlight, UNSW among independent reviewers. No review comments or accepted edits recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-salter-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Michael Salter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
            "sourceName": "Michael Salter",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Acknowledgements p5 identify review participation. No manuscript comments, editorial veto, or toolkit drafting established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mariesa Nicholas",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
            "sourceName": "Mariesa Nicholas",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p8 explicitly locates this report in the Toolbox project, alongside measurement/data work packages.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-workpackage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes as work package3 deliverable",
            "sourceName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Sonia Livingstone; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-livingstone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sonia Livingstone",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Sonia Livingstone",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Anri van der Spuy; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-spuy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anri van der Spuy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Anri van der Spuy",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Kim R. Sylwander; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-sylwander"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Kim R. Sylwander",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Kim R. Sylwander",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-dfc",
      "label": "Digital Futures for Children centre",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Joint LSE and 5Rights research centre; report acknowledges centre funding from 5Rights.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-dfc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-dfc",
        "name": "Digital Futures for Children centre",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Joint LSE and 5Rights research centre; report acknowledges centre funding from 5Rights.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Joint LSE and 5Rights research centre; report acknowledges centre funding from 5Rights."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Digital Futures for Children is a joint London School of Economics and 5Rights research centre. It published the December 2024 Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse, whose back matter acknowledges 5Rights support for the centre.",
        "structuralRole": "Academic and advocacy-linked publication home for child-safety research",
        "significance": "The centre connects an academic setting, an advocacy organization's resources and a policy-facing report. That relationship helps explain how the output is produced and distributed, while centre-level funding remains a different financial claim from a report-specific commission or a donor's editorial right.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Publication and resource basis",
            "text": "The report's self-citation and LSE repository record identify the DFC/LSE/5Rights publication. The repository deposited it on 3 December 2024, with December on the cover. The back cover acknowledges centre funding from 5Rights but gives no report-specific award amount or approval terms. Its principles report is also situated within the wider Toolbox project, so institutional support and project funding should be followed separately.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-centre-funding",
              "w5-enc-e-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p61 self-citation and LSE record identify DFC/LSE/5Rights publication.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes",
            "sourceName": "Digital Futures for Children centre",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 cover; 5Rights notice4Dec2024; LSE deposited3Dec2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Back cover p61 identifies centre-level support. It does not disclose a report-specific 5Rights award, amount, or editorial rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-centre-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is acknowledged as funding the centre",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "Digital Futures for Children centre",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-ukri",
      "label": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is acknowledged as funding → REPHRAIN research centre. Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-ukri",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-ukri",
        "name": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is acknowledged as funding → REPHRAIN research centre. Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UK Research and Innovation is the public research-funding body acknowledged in two separate routes in this corpus: support for the REPHRAIN centre and funding of a pilot preceding UNESCO's civil-society and academic AI network. The records describe institutional support at different programme levels.",
        "structuralRole": "Public research funder supporting distinct safety-research and network-building activities",
        "significance": "A common funder can support unrelated programmes without creating a common campaign. Here the centre-level and pilot-level acknowledgments explain resource ancestry, while the exact onward allocations remain separate questions. This prevents a broad public-research award being assigned wholesale to a later report or advocacy subgroup.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two funding acknowledgments",
            "text": "The December 2024 CSEA principles report identifies UKRI support for REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. UNESCO's network history credits UKRI with an earlier pilot before the June 2025 network launch. Neither retained passage gives a project-specific amount, payment schedule or publication-approval terms, and the pilot acknowledgment does not establish Global Call campaign funding.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-ukri",
              "w8-red-e-ukri-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-ukri"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is acknowledged as funding",
            "sourceName": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
            "targetName": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Earlier pilot ancestry, not campaign funding or current subgroup grant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ukri-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funded preceding pilot per UNESCO history",
            "sourceName": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": "Pilot predates June2025 network"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-rephrain",
      "label": "REPHRAIN research centre",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is acknowledged as funding → REPHRAIN research centre. Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-rephrain",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-rephrain",
        "name": "REPHRAIN research centre",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is acknowledged as funding → REPHRAIN research centre. Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
            "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
            "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "REPHRAIN is a UKRI-funded Centre of Research Excellence appearing in the corpus as a source of research support and evaluation work. Its fourth Strategic Funding Call supported the Toolbox for Measuring Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, linking centre-level resources to a named project.",
        "structuralRole": "Research centre distributing support to projects and hosting evaluation expertise",
        "significance": "The centre connects public research funding with specialist measurement and safety work. It is important to follow which project or call a reference concerns: earlier evaluation work cited in the encryption debate and the later Toolbox award are different activities, even though they share the same institutional home.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and separate research routes",
            "text": "The December 2024 principles report acknowledges UKRI support for REPHRAIN as a three-year centre. REPHRAIN's January 2024 fourth-call announcement and a UKRI collaboration record corroborate the Toolbox support and intended reuse of its outputs. Levy and Robinson's July 2022 paper points instead to Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation. The retained records do not assign the entire centre grant to the Toolbox or disclose that project's publication-control terms.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
                "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
                "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
                "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-ukri",
              "w5-enc-e-project-funding",
              "w6-ref-e-rephrain"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Reference is to Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation, not the later Toolbox award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-rephrain"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "points to separate evaluation work at",
            "sourceName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "targetName": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "date": "July 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fourth-call award is now corroborated by REPHRAIN announcement and UKRI-hosted Cambridge collaboration record. They identify competitive selection, funding and intended integration of outputs into REPHRAIN resources. Neither gives the Toolbox allocation or publication-control terms. Parent centre grant value must not be assigned to this project.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-project-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
                "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
                "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
              },
              {
                "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
                "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funds through its fourth Strategic Funding Call",
            "sourceName": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "targetName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "date": "UKRI collaboration row gives start year2023; award announcement18 January 2024; executed award dates and payment schedule not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-ukri"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is acknowledged as funding",
            "sourceName": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
            "targetName": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
            "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
            "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-toolbox",
      "label": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Report identifies itself as work package3, funded through REPHRAIN fourth Strategic Funding Call.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-toolbox",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-toolbox",
        "name": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Report identifies itself as work package3, funded through REPHRAIN fourth Strategic Funding Call.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report identifies itself as work package3, funded through REPHRAIN fourth Strategic Funding Call."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
            "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
            "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Toolbox for Measuring Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse is a research project funded through REPHRAIN's fourth Strategic Funding Call. Its December 2024 principles report identifies Amy Orben at the University of Cambridge as project lead and situates that report within a wider set of work packages.",
        "structuralRole": "Funded research project combining measurement analysis with policy-facing principles",
        "significance": "The project connects a research funding mechanism to distinct outputs. Separating the measurement work from the principles report makes clear that project leadership, report authorship and funder acceptance are different roles. It also prevents the whole research centre's grant being misrepresented as this project's budget.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and deliverables",
            "text": "REPHRAIN announced the competitive fourth-call projects on 18 January 2024, and a UKRI-hosted collaboration record corroborates support and intended integration of outputs into centre resources. Work package 2 produced a reliability-analysis report dated 1 October 2024, with rationale, code and analyses. The guiding-principles report is work package 3. The retained sources do not disclose the Toolbox allocation or publication-control terms, and publication alone does not establish funder acceptance of each deliverable.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
                "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
                "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
                "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
                "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-project-funding",
              "w5-enc-e-workpackage",
              "w5-enc-e-lead",
              "w6-award-e-deliverable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The dated report exposes a rationale, code and analyses; this scoped inspection checks its identity and declared work rather than validating the scientific results. UKRI identifies it as a 2024 outcome. Publication is distinct from funder acceptance or proof of contractual requirements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-deliverable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
                "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
                "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "produced a publicly available work-package2 analytical report",
            "sourceName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "targetName": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
            "date": "Report dated 1 October 2024."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report p8 names Amy Orben (University of Cambridge) as project lead; does not make her an author of this report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-lead"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Amy Orben",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as project lead of",
            "sourceName": "Amy Orben",
            "targetName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p8 explicitly locates this report in the Toolbox project, alongside measurement/data work packages.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-workpackage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes as work package3 deliverable",
            "sourceName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fourth-call award is now corroborated by REPHRAIN announcement and UKRI-hosted Cambridge collaboration record. They identify competitive selection, funding and intended integration of outputs into REPHRAIN resources. Neither gives the Toolbox allocation or publication-control terms. Parent centre grant value must not be assigned to this project.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-project-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
                "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
                "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
              },
              {
                "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
                "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funds through its fourth Strategic Funding Call",
            "sourceName": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "targetName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "date": "UKRI collaboration row gives start year2023; award announcement18 January 2024; executed award dates and payment schedule not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
            "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
            "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-nicholas",
      "label": "Mariesa Nicholas",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Report p5 names her as independent peer reviewer with Australian e-Safety Commissioner Office affiliation; no toolkit authorship inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-nicholas",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-nicholas",
        "name": "Mariesa Nicholas",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Report p5 names her as independent peer reviewer with Australian e-Safety Commissioner Office affiliation; no toolkit authorship inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report p5 names her as independent peer reviewer with Australian e-Safety Commissioner Office affiliation; no toolkit authorship inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mariesa Nicholas appears in the December 2024 DFC report as an independent peer reviewer, with an Australian eSafety Commissioner Office affiliation. The report was later cited in eSafety’s own Safety by Design toolkit.",
        "structuralRole": "A documented review connection between research and regulator",
        "significance": "This is a more specific link than a regulator simply finding a paper online: an affiliated reviewer is acknowledged in the earlier research. It helps explain institutional proximity, while leaving the actual editorial decisions unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the acknowledgement tells us",
            "text": "Page 5 of the DFC report records Nicholas’s review participation and affiliation at publication. It supplies no manuscript comments, accepted changes or editorial veto. The later toolkit’s citations therefore cannot be attributed to Nicholas personally from this acknowledgement. Her entry identifies a real research-review contact; the corresponding evidence needed to establish influence on the wording would be review correspondence or a drafting record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-review",
              "w5-enc-e-affiliation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Acknowledgements p5 identify review participation. No manuscript comments, editorial veto, or toolkit drafting established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
            "sourceName": "Mariesa Nicholas",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report p5 identifies Australian e-Safety Commissioner Office affiliation at publication; not a current staff verification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-affiliation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is affiliated with in the report acknowledgement",
            "sourceName": "Mariesa Nicholas",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "Who funded and contributed",
            "text": "P5 names Mariesa Nicholas, Australian e-Safety Commissioner's Office , among four independent peer reviewers, alongside Hazel Bitaña, Michael Salter and Fabio Senne. This establishes named review participation and contemporaneous institutional affiliation. It does not establish current employment, the substance of her comments, corporate endorsement, or authorship of the toolkit's encryption sentences. The six cover authors remain named authors without allocating particular passages to individuals.",
            "matched": [
              "Mariesa Nicholas"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5b6e29412c3cfd5c18e27d80c1074cc923c9c8173fb4776363c7c0824385a470"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-orben",
      "label": "Amy Orben",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Report p8 identifies her as the Toolbox project lead at University of Cambridge.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-orben",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-orben",
        "name": "Amy Orben",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Report p8 identifies her as the Toolbox project lead at University of Cambridge.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report p8 identifies her as the Toolbox project lead at University of Cambridge."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Amy Orben is identified as the University of Cambridge lead of the Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA project. She is also a credited coauthor of its October 2024 reliability analyses, alongside Matthew Richards and Sakshi Ghai.",
        "structuralRole": "Research programme leadership and measurement expertise",
        "significance": "Her recorded role concerns organising and evaluating the measurement research underlying the wider project. This distinguishes the empirical work on reliability from the separate policy-oriented report later cited by eSafety.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Her place within the Toolbox project",
            "text": "The DFC report identifies Orben as project lead on page 8. The Work Package 2 report credits her as a coauthor of the reliability analyses. The guiding-principles report is Work Package 3 and names its own authors. Project leadership connects these outputs organisationally; it does not assign Orben authorship or final approval of every policy recommendation in the separate report.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
                "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-lead",
              "w6-award-e-wp2-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report credits Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben. This authorship does not allocate drafting or approval of the separate DFC WorkPackage3 report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-wp2-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
                "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is a credited co-author of",
            "sourceName": "Amy Orben",
            "targetName": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
            "date": "Report dated 1 October 2024."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Report p8 names Amy Orben (University of Cambridge) as project lead; does not make her an author of this report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-lead"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as project lead of",
            "sourceName": "Amy Orben",
            "targetName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return",
            "heading": "1. REPHRAIN: award confirmation, output identity, missing instrument",
            "text": "The same UKRI record links the WP2 reliability-analysis page. That artifact is dated 1 October2024 and credits Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben . Its rationale names an evaluation report and shareable analytical code, alongside intended updating with Cambridge/LSE/UNICEF teams through2025. This is a real published work product; it is separate from the retained December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. I read its identity and rationale, not its scientific validity or executable code.",
            "matched": [
              "Amy Orben",
              "Orben"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "eb51985c5dc81aa67fc7eae3bbd70dd7665e341894b2cb0d07a9377793848c53"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "Who funded and contributed",
            "text": "Reportp5 identifies the research as part of Toolbox for Measuring Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse , funded through REPHRAIN's fourth Strategic Funding Call . It identifies UKRI as REPHRAIN's funder. P8 says Amy Orben of Cambridge led the project and this report is work package3. The current DFC project page independently documents the publisher's account of project funding and participating institutions; it shares project ancestry with the report and is not an independent audit of the money.",
            "matched": [
              "Amy Orben",
              "Orben"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f840705536a26757af415a6fca8f87d97053ac5f2f042af50191722729020934"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-workshop",
      "label": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Public FOI correspondence identifies workshop and subsequent toolkit drafting. No paragraph is backdated to the workshop.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-workshop",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-workshop",
        "name": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Public FOI correspondence identifies workshop and subsequent toolkit drafting. No paragraph is backdated to the workshop.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public FOI correspondence identifies workshop and subsequent toolkit drafting. No paragraph is backdated to the workshop."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public FOI correspondence identifies workshop and subsequent toolkit drafting. No paragraph is backdated to the workshop.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "5May2025 invitation says toolkit was shaped since the Dec2024 workshop. It lists E2EE and AI in draft core content but does not reproduce particular recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-workshop"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as an input to toolkit drafting before",
            "sourceName": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "Dec2024 workshop; 5May2025 invitation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The31October 2025 comments p1 describe inclusion in eSafety December2024 workshop. This is the participant's account; no attendance roster independently acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-workshop"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Common Sense Media",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports participation in",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
            "date": "December2024 participation retrospectively reported31October 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "label": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Published FOI25139 Doc19 preserves 5May invitation and 16May X response; attachment contents not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-consultation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "name": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published FOI25139 Doc19 preserves 5May invitation and 16May X response; attachment contents not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published FOI25139 Doc19 preserves 5May invitation and 16May X response; attachment contents not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation was a draft-review process preserved in released correspondence. A 5 May invitation offered written and verbal feedback on core content and practical tools, followed by a stated opportunity to comment on a later final draft.",
        "structuralRole": "Documented access and feedback process during safety-toolkit development",
        "significance": "Consultation records expose who could see drafts and what kind of changes the agency invited. Here they establish an offered review route and one actual response, helping distinguish access to drafting from authorship, approval or endorsement of the eventual publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The invitation and reply",
            "text": "The invitation said development followed a December 2024 workshop and listed end-to-end encryption and AI among core topics. It requested particular attention to Attachment B's tools, with a 16 May deadline and optional 20 May meeting. X replied on 16 May that it had no additional feedback. The retained correspondence names Attachments A and B but does not provide their inspected full contents or demonstrate that every offered review stage occurred.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-workshop",
              "w5-enc-e-consultation",
              "w5-enc-e-x-access",
              "w5-enc-e-x-response",
              "w6-draft-e-may-a",
              "w6-draft-e-may-b"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Doc19 pp30-31: AttachmentA core content and AttachmentB tools; emphasis on B; deadline16May, optional20May meeting, second final-draft redline opportunity announced. These are offered process steps, not proof all occurred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-consultation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "invites written edits and verbal feedback through",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "5May2025 invitation quoted in16May chain"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment B; Doc19PDF30-31 asks particular attention and marked-up feedback on this attachment. Actual file and returned edits not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-may-b"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment B: practical tools",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named tools attachment to",
            "sourceName": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment B: practical tools",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "5May 2025 invitation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "5May2025 invitation says toolkit was shaped since the Dec2024 workshop. It lists E2EE and AI in draft core content but does not reproduce particular recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-workshop"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as an input to toolkit drafting before",
            "sourceName": "December 2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "Dec2024 workshop; 5May2025 invitation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment A. Doc19PDF30 lists core-content topics. Exact text, including E2EE wording, remains unread.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-may-a"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment A: core content",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named core-content attachment to",
            "sourceName": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment A: core content",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "5May 2025 invitation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Doc19 PDF29 displays response16May2025 11:33PM. Does not establish endorsement of final2026 text or absence of all other communications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "X Corp.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "replies that it has no additional feedback to",
            "sourceName": "X Corp.",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "16May2025 response"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Released 5May invitation to @x.com, in Doc19. Access is specific to this consultation, not evidence of drafting responsibility.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "X Corp.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides draft-toolkit review opportunity to",
            "sourceName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "targetName": "X Corp.",
            "date": "5May2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-x",
      "label": "X Corp.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Corporate recipient identified by released correspondence and @x.com domains; private names remain redacted.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-x",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-x",
        "name": "X Corp.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Corporate recipient identified by released correspondence and @x.com domains; private names remain redacted.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Corporate recipient identified by released correspondence and @x.com domains; private names remain redacted."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "X Corp. is the platform company identified in released eSafety correspondence through corporate context and x.com addresses. The records show it receiving a May 2025 draft-toolkit review opportunity while also contesting the applicability of an Australian industry standard in court.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulated company simultaneously participating in consultation and disputing legal obligations",
        "significance": "These parallel interactions show why consultation access should not be equated with regulatory agreement. A company may review practical guidance while litigating a separate legal question, and a response offering no additional edits does not endorse every provision in a later final document.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Consultation alongside dispute",
            "text": "The 5 May invitation offered X review of toolkit drafts, and its 16 May response said it had no additional feedback. A separate 21 May eSafety reply refers to X Corp v eSafety, NSD751/2025, and declines an undertaking concerning non-enforcement while proceedings continue. The retained correspondence does not establish a final court outcome, current applicability determination or a connection between the dispute and particular toolkit wording.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-access",
              "w5-enc-e-x-response",
              "w5-enc-e-x-dispute"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FOI Doc21 PDF34 is eSafety's 21 May 2025 reply referencing X Corp v eSafety, NSD751/2025. eSafety refuses the requested undertaking concerning non-enforcement while proceedings continue. Consultation coexisted with dispute; no court outcome, current applicability determination or connection to particular toolkit wording is claimed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-dispute"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contests standard applicability in a recorded court dispute with",
            "sourceName": "X Corp.",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Doc19 PDF29 displays response16May2025 11:33PM. Does not establish endorsement of final2026 text or absence of all other communications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "replies that it has no additional feedback to",
            "sourceName": "X Corp.",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "16May2025 response"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Released 5May invitation to @x.com, in Doc19. Access is specific to this consultation, not evidence of drafting responsibility.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-x-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides draft-toolkit review opportunity to",
            "sourceName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "targetName": "X Corp.",
            "date": "5May2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-spuy",
      "label": "Anri van der Spuy",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-spuy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-spuy",
        "name": "Anri van der Spuy",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anri van der Spuy is one of six credited authors of the December 2024 DFC report setting out principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse. That report subsequently became a source in Australian eSafety guidance.",
        "structuralRole": "Authorship of a policy-relevant research report",
        "significance": "Her relevance here is the production of a text that travelled into a regulator’s advice to industry. The evidence supports an author relationship, with the report’s later use supplying the institutional connection.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The published contribution",
            "text": "The report cover names van der Spuy alongside Witting, Burton, Day, Livingstone and Sylwander. eSafety later cited the report for discussion of platform hopping and beside a separate encryption recommendation. The retained evidence does not allocate individual passages among the six authors, so neither recommendation should be attributed personally to van der Spuy without further drafting evidence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-spuy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Anri van der Spuy; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-spuy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Anri van der Spuy",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "What the cited report supports",
            "text": "The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse , by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes Security and Safety, vol.4 . That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.",
            "matched": [
              "Anri van der Spuy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777cbdd1c14f741f410ec0b20c0a628131892bf046896086b98501d7c4ff3ed8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-witting",
      "label": "Sabine Witting",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-witting",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-witting",
        "name": "Sabine Witting",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sabine Witting is a coauthor of the December 2024 DFC report on technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse. euCONSENT also named her, alongside Emma Day of Tech Legality, as an intended leader of its commissioned AgeAware human-rights review.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal assessment across research and verification design",
        "significance": "Witting connects the production of child-safety principles with a project seeking to assess the rights implications of age-assurance infrastructure. That makes the scope and independence of the later review particularly relevant to understanding the proposed scheme.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Published authorship and a reported commission",
            "text": "Her name appears on the DFC report’s cover. A January 2025 euCONSENT update describes the proposed review leadership for AgeAware. The commission’s contract, fee, clearance conditions and finished output were not recovered. Those gaps concern the commissioning arrangement; they do not erase the published authorship, nor justify treating Witting as the author of every recommendation later made by eSafety.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-witting",
              "w7-adv-e-review-witting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Sabine Witting; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-witting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Sabine Witting",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The project update named Sabine Witting, alongside Emma Day, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-witting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
            "sourceName": "Sabine Witting",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "What the cited report supports",
            "text": "The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse , by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes Security and Safety, vol.4 . That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.",
            "matched": [
              "Sabine Witting",
              "Witting"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777cbdd1c14f741f410ec0b20c0a628131892bf046896086b98501d7c4ff3ed8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-burton",
      "label": "Patrick Burton",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-burton",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-burton",
        "name": "Patrick Burton",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Patrick Burton is a named coauthor of the December 2024 DFC guiding-principles report on technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse. The report was produced within the Toolbox research project and subsequently cited by eSafety.",
        "structuralRole": "Contributor to research used in government guidance",
        "significance": "Burton’s recorded role concerns the substance of a shared research publication. Its later policy use is the reason for following this authorship link, rather than treating every person associated with the project as a decision-maker.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The connection and its scope",
            "text": "The published cover names Burton with five other authors. The report’s platform-hopping discussion and its placement beside encryption advice in eSafety’s toolkit are separate citation issues. The corpus does not identify which author wrote a given passage or whether Burton participated in the toolkit’s drafting. His established contribution is coauthorship of the underlying report.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-burton"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Patrick Burton; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-burton"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Patrick Burton",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "What the cited report supports",
            "text": "The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse , by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes Security and Safety, vol.4 . That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.",
            "matched": [
              "Patrick Burton",
              "Burton"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777cbdd1c14f741f410ec0b20c0a628131892bf046896086b98501d7c4ff3ed8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-day",
      "label": "Emma Day",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-day",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-day",
        "name": "Emma Day",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Emma Day is a named author of the December 2024 DFC guiding-principles report on technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse. A separate euCONSENT update names her, with Sabine Witting of Tech Legality, as an intended leader of an AgeAware human-rights review.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal expertise across safety research and age-assurance review",
        "significance": "Day’s two recorded roles connect policy research with the assessment of a proposed verification scheme. That is a substantive professional overlap: expertise used to frame a safety problem can also be commissioned to assess the rights implications of a proposed response.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The two assignments",
            "text": "The DFC report credits Day on its cover. The January 2025 euCONSENT project account describes the intended review leadership for AgeAware. It does not supply a personal contract, completed review or approval terms. These records support authorship of one published report and a named prospective role in another project; they do not assign Day any particular encryption recommendation or give her control of either institution.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-day",
              "w7-adv-e-review-day"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Emma Day; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-day"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Emma Day",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The project update named Emma Day, alongside Sabine Witting, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-day"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
            "sourceName": "Emma Day",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "What the cited report supports",
            "text": "The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse , by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes Security and Safety, vol.4 . That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.",
            "matched": [
              "Emma Day"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777cbdd1c14f741f410ec0b20c0a628131892bf046896086b98501d7c4ff3ed8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-livingstone",
      "label": "Sonia Livingstone",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-livingstone",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-livingstone",
        "name": "Sonia Livingstone",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sonia Livingstone is a named coauthor of the December 2024 DFC guiding-principles report. In a separate project account, euCONSENT named her among the team academics through whom it commissioned an assessment of AgeAware’s child-rights and wider human-rights impact.",
        "structuralRole": "Academic authority in safety principles and rights assessment",
        "significance": "Livingstone’s recorded contribution spans writing research principles and helping arrange scrutiny of a proposed age-assurance system. Those are different professional functions, but together they show how academic expertise participates in both defining a policy problem and evaluating a technical response.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What connects the projects",
            "text": "The published DFC report credits her as an author. euCONSENT’s January 2025 account names Livingstone, Simone van der Hof and Abhilash Nair as the academic route through which the review was commissioned, with Emma Day and Sabine Witting as intended leads. It does not establish three individual contracts, a completed review or a personal approval power over the scheme.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-livingstone",
              "w7-adv-e-review-livingstone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Sonia Livingstone; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-livingstone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Sonia Livingstone",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The project account said the review was commissioned through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair. This identifies an attributed commissioning route, not three personally executed contracts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-livingstone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named among team academics through whom review was commissioned",
            "sourceName": "Sonia Livingstone",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "What the cited report supports",
            "text": "The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse , by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes Security and Safety, vol.4 . That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.",
            "matched": [
              "Sonia Livingstone",
              "Livingstone"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777cbdd1c14f741f410ec0b20c0a628131892bf046896086b98501d7c4ff3ed8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-sylwander",
      "label": "Kim R. Sylwander",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-enc-sylwander",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-sylwander",
        "name": "Kim R. Sylwander",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named report author on December2024 cover; no allocation of particular sentences."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Kim R. Sylwander is a credited coauthor of the December 2024 Digital Futures for Children guiding-principles report. The report forms part of the Toolbox measurement project and later appears among the sources used by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner.",
        "structuralRole": "Research authorship within a multi-institution project",
        "significance": "Sylwander’s place in this map is as a contributor to a shared research output with subsequent policy use. This is an intellectual-production role; the record does not establish a funding, management or regulatory appointment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the authorship supports",
            "text": "The report’s cover identifies Sylwander as one of six authors. Its later citation by eSafety explains why the authorship belongs in this investigation. Individual drafting responsibilities are not disclosed, and no separate instruction from Sylwander to the regulator is recorded. The useful next evidence would concern the report’s development and the toolkit’s selection of particular findings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-sylwander"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report cover names Kim R. Sylwander; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-enc-e-author-sylwander"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Kim R. Sylwander",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "What the cited report supports",
            "text": "The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse , by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes Security and Safety, vol.4 . That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.",
            "matched": [
              "Kim R. Sylwander",
              "Sylwander"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "777cbdd1c14f741f410ec0b20c0a628131892bf046896086b98501d7c4ff3ed8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-unsw",
      "label": "UNSW Sydney",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "UNSW Sydney named institution for project → UNSW online-offending survey project. 2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-unsw",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-unsw",
        "name": "UNSW Sydney",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "UNSW Sydney named institution for project → UNSW online-offending survey project. 2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UNSW Sydney named institution for project → UNSW online-offending survey project. 2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named institution for project",
            "sourceName": "UNSW Sydney",
            "targetName": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-project2021",
      "label": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named in Westpac 2021 research-grant recipients. Related 2023 Australian report and 2025 multinational analysis are distinct publications.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-project2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-project2021",
        "name": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
        "role": "Research",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named in Westpac 2021 research-grant recipients. Related 2023 Australian report and 2025 multinational analysis are distinct publications.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in Westpac 2021 research-grant recipients. Related 2023 Australian report and 2025 multinational analysis are distinct publications."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named in Westpac 2021 research-grant recipients. Related 2023 Australian report and 2025 multinational analysis are distinct publications.",
        "structuralRole": "Research",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Westpac lists the UNSW Australian Human Rights Institute project within research grants of $150,000 each over up to two years. AUD is contextual to the Australian grant programme, not an explicit currency code in this page. Not a disbursement and not an earmark from ICMEC's $25m partnership. Financial details: value: 150,000; currency: AUD; kind: announced award; period: 2021 research grant; up to two years",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-grant2021"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Westpac",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced research award",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
                "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNSW Sydney",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named institution for project",
            "sourceName": "UNSW Sydney",
            "targetName": "UNSW online-offending survey project",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Study C in Childlight Searchlight2025. Recommendations are researchers' proposals, not observed bank rules.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-study2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "name": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Study C in Childlight Searchlight2025. Recommendations are researchers' proposals, not observed bank rules.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Study C in Childlight Searchlight2025. Recommendations are researchers' proposals, not observed bank rules."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Study C in Childlight’s Searchlight 2025 examines financial behaviour using a multinational survey and recommends wider monitoring and information-sharing across banks, technology companies and law enforcement. Westpac funding, a study partner and an advisory committee are disclosed.",
        "structuralRole": "Research that proposes new financial surveillance practices",
        "significance": "The consequential step is the move from survey findings to recommendations for operational monitoring. Funding and specialist advice help explain how that agenda was developed; the study itself is not evidence that banks implemented its proposed detection or account-restriction rules.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The data and support behind the proposal",
            "text": "The analysis uses a 4,918-person Australian, British and US survey associated with UNSW ethics reference HC220317. It shares data ancestry with an earlier methods paper, so those outputs should not be counted as separate funded surveys. Westpac is acknowledged as funder; Jesuit Social Services is named as partner; Michael Salter is among the researchers. An advisory committee is listed, but its attendance, edits and approval powers are not public in the retained material. Survey-panel, self-report and legal-category limitations remain relevant when assessing the proposed financial screening.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
                "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-study-funding",
              "w5-fund-e-publication",
              "w5-fund-e-advice",
              "w5-fund-e-jss-partner",
              "w5-fund-e-recommendation",
              "w5-fund-e-salter-author",
              "w6-award-e-reuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Study C recommends widening financial detection and sharing across finance, technology and law enforcement. Its survey-panel/self-report and legal-category limitations do not establish an operational classifier or account-closure rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-recommendation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Broader financial monitoring proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends expanded monitoring and sharing",
            "sourceName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "targetName": "Broader financial monitoring proposal",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Searchlight2025 Study C identifies Michael Salter as an author/researcher. Particular recommendation authorship is not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-salter-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Michael Salter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Michael Salter",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Childlight published Study C with named researchers, funding and advice disclosures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Childlight",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published in Searchlight 2025",
            "sourceName": "Childlight",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Study C credits Westpac funding. The later author methods account credits Westpac for the underlying survey and reports expansion to UK/US samples at no extra cost following ethical/stakeholder approval. Neither specifies how the 2021 award, later analysis costs or institutional core support were allocated; no publication right or veto established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-study-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Westpac",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "research funding acknowledged",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Study C reports a 4,918-person Australian/UK/US survey and links j7xh2 and HC220317, matching the methods paper. This is shared data ancestry, not an extra grant or proof that the 2021 award equals Study C costs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-reuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
                "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplies the survey data for a later financial-behaviour analysis",
            "sourceName": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Survey2022; Study C published2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Study C names a committee including Ashley Katz, Denzil Clark, Mark Dickson, Sarah Napier, Carol Ronken and Danielle Kelly. Listing does not reveal meeting attendance, edits or final approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Study C advisory committee",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advisory committee listed",
            "sourceName": "Study C advisory committee",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-jss-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jesuit Social Services",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "study partner listed",
            "sourceName": "Jesuit Social Services",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-childlight",
      "label": "Childlight",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Childlight published in Searchlight 2025 → Financial-behaviour study · 2025. Childlight published Study C with named researchers, funding and advice disclosures.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-childlight",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-childlight",
        "name": "Childlight",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Childlight published in Searchlight 2025 → Financial-behaviour study · 2025. Childlight published Study C with named researchers, funding and advice disclosures.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Childlight is the research organisation publishing Searchlight 2025, including a study of financial behaviour connected with child sexual exploitation. Its report identifies researchers, funding and advisers and links the work to recommendations for wider financial monitoring and cross-sector information sharing.",
        "structuralRole": "Research publisher connecting funding and professional advice to monitoring recommendations",
        "significance": "Childlight turns a funded study into a public argument about how financial institutions and other organisations should respond. Named advisers provide a route for practitioner knowledge into the work. The published recommendations remain distinct from a validated detection system, bank adoption or an observed account decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed support and the study's limits",
            "text": "Study C acknowledges Westpac funding and advisers including Westpac's Mark Dickson and ICMEC Australia's Danielle Kelly. The report also identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01, with UNSW hub support through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement. These are separate disclosed support layers without a reconciled per-output budget. The study acknowledges panel recruitment, self-report and legal-category limitations. The retained material provides no base-rate calibration or operational validation that would justify treating its recommendations as an already proven financial-monitoring method.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-publication",
              "w5-fund-e-core-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Childlight published Study C with named researchers, funding and advice disclosures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published in Searchlight 2025",
            "sourceName": "Childlight",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-core-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Dignity Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "core grant acknowledged",
            "sourceName": "Human Dignity Foundation",
            "targetName": "Childlight",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The study also identifies support for UNSW's Childlight hub through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. Global acknowledgements thank JSS for funding two studies. Payment flow, amounts and any double-counting remain unresolved; the case records the disclosed layers separately without summing them. Searchlight's programme wording is Safer Families, Safer Communities, whereas Westpac's page uses Safer Children, Safer Communities; retain the wording difference rather than silently rewriting the source.",
            "matched": [
              "Childlight"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2748b204684c4ceaa96de2ac7c90ee59c6ba152aa801dd90153fddd122d5951"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The new mechanism is resource support plus named advisory access to a published recommendation. Childlight Searchlight2025 Study C (PDF31–32, printed23–24) credits Westpac funding and names a committee including Westpac's Mark Dickson and ICMEC Australia's Danielle Kelly. It recommends broader financial monitoring and cross-sector sharing. This is a published recommendation, not a demonstrated detection system or bank decision. The report acknowledges panel recruitment, self-report and legal-category limitations; no base-rate calibration or operational validation was recovered in the inspected material.",
            "matched": [
              "Childlight"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4ffcce02ab71ef01c9471031ea4868986bafc801bc1f8cb52471040b7a66c2de"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-hdf",
      "label": "Human Dignity Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Human Dignity Foundation core grant acknowledged → Childlight. Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-hdf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-hdf",
        "name": "Human Dignity Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Human Dignity Foundation core grant acknowledged → Childlight. Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Human Dignity Foundation core grant acknowledged → Childlight. Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-core-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Childlight",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "core grant acknowledged",
            "sourceName": "Human Dignity Foundation",
            "targetName": "Childlight",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The study also identifies support for UNSW's Childlight hub through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. Global acknowledgements thank JSS for funding two studies. Payment flow, amounts and any double-counting remain unresolved; the case records the disclosed layers separately without summing them. Searchlight's programme wording is Safer Families, Safer Communities, whereas Westpac's page uses Safer Children, Safer Communities; retain the wording difference rather than silently rewriting the source.",
            "matched": [
              "Human Dignity Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d2748b204684c4ceaa96de2ac7c90ee59c6ba152aa801dd90153fddd122d5951"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-advisory",
      "label": "Study C advisory committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Report-listed advisers; no minutes, attendance or individual edit record obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-advisory",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-advisory",
        "name": "Study C advisory committee",
        "role": "Committee",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Report-listed advisers; no minutes, attendance or individual edit record obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report-listed advisers; no minutes, attendance or individual edit record obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Report-listed advisers; no minutes, attendance or individual edit record obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Study C names a committee including Ashley Katz, Denzil Clark, Mark Dickson, Sarah Napier, Carol Ronken and Danielle Kelly. Listing does not reveal meeting attendance, edits or final approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advisory committee listed",
            "sourceName": "Study C advisory committee",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Study C identifies Danielle Kelly, Head of Capacity and Prevention at ICMEC Australia, as an adviser. No evidence this was a Lighthouse evaluation or SaferAI drafting group.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-icmec-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "capacity lead named as adviser",
            "sourceName": "ICMEC Australia",
            "targetName": "Study C advisory committee",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Study C identifies Mark Dickson, Executive Manager Financial Crime at Westpac, as an adviser. No claim that he exercised the bank's editorial veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-bank-adviser"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Westpac",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "executive named as adviser",
            "sourceName": "Westpac",
            "targetName": "Study C advisory committee",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-monitoring",
      "label": "Broader financial monitoring proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Research recommendation to expand transaction detection and cross-sector information sharing; no validated operational classifier or implementation shown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-monitoring",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-monitoring",
        "name": "Broader financial monitoring proposal",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Research recommendation to expand transaction detection and cross-sector information sharing; no validated operational classifier or implementation shown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Research recommendation to expand transaction detection and cross-sector information sharing; no validated operational classifier or implementation shown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Research recommendation to expand transaction detection and cross-sector information sharing; no validated operational classifier or implementation shown.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Study C recommends widening financial detection and sharing across finance, technology and law enforcement. Its survey-panel/self-report and legal-category limitations do not establish an operational classifier or account-closure rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-recommendation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends expanded monitoring and sharing",
            "sourceName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "targetName": "Broader financial monitoring proposal",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-jss",
      "label": "Jesuit Social Services",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Jesuit Social Services study partner listed → Financial-behaviour study · 2025. Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-jss",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-jss",
        "name": "Jesuit Social Services",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Jesuit Social Services study partner listed → Financial-behaviour study · 2025. Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "safety",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Jesuit Social Services study partner listed → Financial-behaviour study · 2025. Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-jss-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "study partner listed",
            "sourceName": "Jesuit Social Services",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-salter",
      "label": "Michael Salter",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named author of Childlight2025 Study C and independent peer reviewer of DFC2024 report. Roles in separate documents do not establish control over either institution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w5-fund-salter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-salter",
        "name": "Michael Salter",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named author of Childlight2025 Study C and independent peer reviewer of DFC2024 report. Roles in separate documents do not establish control over either institution.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named author of Childlight2025 Study C and independent peer reviewer of DFC2024 report. Roles in separate documents do not establish control over either institution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Michael Salter is a researcher linked here to two different bodies of child-safety work: authorship of Childlight’s 2025 financial-behaviour study and independent review of the DFC’s December 2024 guiding-principles report. The latter identifies his Childlight, UNSW affiliation.",
        "structuralRole": "Research expertise crossing financial monitoring and platform safety",
        "significance": "Salter is a useful connection between the financial-monitoring branch and the research later cited in online-safety guidance. His different roles matter: authoring a study is a stronger relationship to its content than being acknowledged as an external reviewer.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The work attributed to him",
            "text": "Searchlight 2025 Study C names Salter among its researchers and recommends broader financial detection and sharing across finance, technology and law enforcement. The DFC report separately thanks him as an independent peer reviewer. Neither document allocates the authorship of particular recommendations or discloses his review comments. The supported picture is repeated professional participation across related research fields, not personal control of the funders, regulator or resulting bank practices.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-salter-author",
              "w5-fund-e-salter-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
              "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "DFC December2024 report p5 identifies Michael Salter of Childlight, UNSW among independent reviewers. No review comments or accepted edits recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-salter-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
                "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
            "sourceName": "Michael Salter",
            "targetName": "Guiding principles for technology-facilitated CSEA (December 2024)",
            "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Searchlight2025 Study C identifies Michael Salter as an author/researcher. Particular recommendation authorship is not allocated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w5-fund-e-salter-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named author of",
            "sourceName": "Michael Salter",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
            "heading": "Who funded and contributed",
            "text": "P5 names Mariesa Nicholas, Australian e-Safety Commissioner's Office , among four independent peer reviewers, alongside Hazel Bitaña, Michael Salter and Fabio Senne. This establishes named review participation and contemporaneous institutional affiliation. It does not establish current employment, the substance of her comments, corporate endorsement, or authorship of the toolkit's encryption sentences. The six cover authors remain named authors without allocating particular passages to individuals.",
            "matched": [
              "Michael Salter",
              "Salter"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5b6e29412c3cfd5c18e27d80c1074cc923c9c8173fb4776363c7c0824385a470"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return",
            "heading": "3. Survey implementation and later output budgets",
            "text": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock's 29 July2025 CrimRxiv methodology preprint , release1, reports an original design for3,000Australian men, Westpac funding, and advisory review. It says CloudResearch subsequently recruited/administered through PrimePanels after an earlier contractor declined the subject matter. This is the authors' account, not vendor correspondence or an executed service contract.",
            "matched": [
              "Salter"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f4ef15ec90f44d2d3fb4ceeb84512eb4849f98b0e3357dcbff99e641bb7d66e7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
            "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-levy",
      "label": "Ian Levy",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Listed as UK National Cyber Security Centre technical director on the July 2022 paper; historical role, not a current-employment claim.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-levy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-levy",
        "name": "Ian Levy",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed as UK National Cyber Security Centre technical director on the July 2022 paper; historical role, not a current-employment claim.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed as UK National Cyber Security Centre technical director on the July 2022 paper; historical role, not a current-employment claim."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ian Levy is identified on the July 2022 paper Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms as technical director of the UK National Cyber Security Centre. He co-authored the technical discussion with GCHQ's Crispin Robinson; the paper supplies the dated professional affiliation used here.",
        "structuralRole": "Security specialist advancing a technically framed child-safety proposal",
        "significance": "Levy's contribution lies in articulating possible protection mechanisms and their unresolved risks in a form that policy institutions can cite. The distinction between professional expertise and official policy is particularly important when technical authors hold public-sector posts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the co-authored work says",
            "text": "The paper discusses client-side protections, acknowledges coercion, database manipulation and mission-creep risks, and expressly disclaims both UK government policy and a complete security analysis. It references REPHRAIN's separate Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation. These are the authors' scoped technical arguments; the record does not establish that the paper is an instruction from their employers or that a production system passed a full security evaluation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-levy-role",
              "w6-ref-e-levy-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical cover affiliation. Does not establish a funded advocacy instruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-levy-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK National Cyber Security Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as technical director of",
            "sourceName": "Ian Levy",
            "targetName": "UK National Cyber Security Centre",
            "date": "July 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-levy-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors",
            "sourceName": "Ian Levy",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "July 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.",
            "matched": [
              "Ian Levy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b58bb2570b3161483e313c1a423a48db936a9fef1083e9a1c46c696598fd20fb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-robinson",
      "label": "Crispin Robinson",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Listed as GCHQ technical director for cryptanalysis on the July 2022 paper; historical role.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-robinson",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-robinson",
        "name": "Crispin Robinson",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed as GCHQ technical director for cryptanalysis on the July 2022 paper; historical role.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed as GCHQ technical director for cryptanalysis on the July 2022 paper; historical role."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Crispin Robinson is identified on the July 2022 paper Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms as GCHQ's technical director for cryptanalysis. He co-authored the paper with Ian Levy. The affiliation is historical and identifies the professional context of that technical intervention.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical author contributing to the debate over protection in encrypted services",
        "significance": "The paper supplies an argument about technical possibilities that can enter policy discussion with the credibility of named security professionals. Its own scope matters: a technical proposal can inform a regulator without constituting government policy, a requirement or a completed assurance of safety.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The paper's argument and limits",
            "text": "Levy and Robinson discuss client-side protections while explicitly disclaiming UK government policy and a complete security analysis. They consider coercion, database manipulation and mission creep; a discussed charity-funding capture scenario is not supported by evidence in the paper. It also points to separate REPHRAIN evaluation work. Those details make the authors' position more specific than a blanket claim that encrypted detection is either solved or impossible.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-robinson-role",
              "w6-ref-e-robinson-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-robinson-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors",
            "sourceName": "Crispin Robinson",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "July 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical cover affiliation; not current employment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-robinson-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GCHQ",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as technical director for cryptanalysis at",
            "sourceName": "Crispin Robinson",
            "targetName": "GCHQ",
            "date": "July 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.",
            "matched": [
              "Crispin Robinson"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b58bb2570b3161483e313c1a423a48db936a9fef1083e9a1c46c696598fd20fb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-ncsc",
      "label": "UK National Cyber Security Centre",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Institution identified on the paper cover; no new funding or command relationship inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-ncsc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-ncsc",
        "name": "UK National Cyber Security Centre",
        "role": "Government body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Institution identified on the paper cover; no new funding or command relationship inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Institution identified on the paper cover; no new funding or command relationship inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Institution identified on the paper cover; no new funding or command relationship inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Government body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical cover affiliation. Does not establish a funded advocacy instruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-levy-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ian Levy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as technical director of",
            "sourceName": "Ian Levy",
            "targetName": "UK National Cyber Security Centre",
            "date": "July 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.",
            "matched": [
              "UK National Cyber Security Centre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b58bb2570b3161483e313c1a423a48db936a9fef1083e9a1c46c696598fd20fb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-gchq",
      "label": "GCHQ",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Institution identified on the paper cover; authors expressly disclaim government policy and requirements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-gchq",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-gchq",
        "name": "GCHQ",
        "role": "Government body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Institution identified on the paper cover; authors expressly disclaim government policy and requirements.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Institution identified on the paper cover; authors expressly disclaim government policy and requirements."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Institution identified on the paper cover; authors expressly disclaim government policy and requirements.",
        "structuralRole": "Government body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Historical cover affiliation; not current employment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-robinson-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crispin Robinson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as technical director for cryptanalysis at",
            "sourceName": "Crispin Robinson",
            "targetName": "GCHQ",
            "date": "July 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.",
            "matched": [
              "GCHQ"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b58bb2570b3161483e313c1a423a48db936a9fef1083e9a1c46c696598fd20fb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding",
            "heading": "Published programme scale and named participants",
            "text": "A separate Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 summary publicly lists CDDP funding of GBP8.4 million and participants DCMS, FCDO, Home Office, Cabinet Office, Ministry of Defence, GCHQ and NCSC. This is announced pilot funding and participation, not a ledger of money received by Faculty or Oliver Wyman, nor proof every participant supplied intelligence data or controlled the platform. Do not add its GBP8.4m to supplier prices, which may be components or differently scoped amounts.",
            "matched": [
              "GCHQ"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "59f8d20a6d35800f07be74e2ad6005bda9aa8ba77d32da3d94792acc9e3ea64f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-paper",
      "label": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Technical proposal later cited by EU and Australian authorities; contains explicit scope limitations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research paper"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-paper",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-paper",
        "name": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
        "role": "Research paper",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Technical proposal later cited by EU and Australian authorities; contains explicit scope limitations.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Technical proposal later cited by EU and Australian authorities; contains explicit scope limitations."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          },
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A 2022 technical paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson exploring child-safety approaches on commodity platforms. It later served as a reference in European Commission arguments and Australian eSafety discussion of detection in encrypted services.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical argument reused across jurisdictions",
        "significance": "The paper helps trace the earlier technical ancestry of proposals that later appear in safety policy. Its circulation across institutions is observable; technical feasibility, policy endorsement and actual deployment are separate questions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How the paper travelled",
            "text": "The European Commission cited the paper in its August 2022 public defence of possible detection within encrypted services. eSafety cited it in its October 2023 encryption position while also discussing security concerns. The authors expressly limited the paper’s policy scope and completeness. Its reference to REPHRAIN concerns evaluation associated with the Safety Tech Challenge Fund; that is a different research route from the later Toolbox award. Neither citation proves a working universal scanning system or transmission of a later confidential bill.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              },
              {
                "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
                "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
              },
              {
                "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-levy-author",
              "w6-ref-e-robinson-author",
              "w6-ref-e-eu-citation",
              "w6-ref-e-au-citation",
              "w6-ref-e-rephrain"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Agency cites the paper while also describing security concerns. Establishes earlier consideration, not later draft transmission.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-au-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              },
              {
                "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety encryption position (October 2023)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cites in discussion of client-side scanning",
            "sourceName": "eSafety encryption position (October 2023)",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "13October 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Reference is to Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation, not the later Toolbox award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-rephrain"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "points to separate evaluation work at",
            "sourceName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "targetName": "REPHRAIN research centre",
            "date": "July 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-levy-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ian Levy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors",
            "sourceName": "Ian Levy",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "July 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Actual citation in political argument; not proof of efficacy or adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-eu-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              },
              {
                "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
                "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission public defence (August 2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cites to support possible encrypted-service detection",
            "sourceName": "European Commission public defence (August 2022)",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "7August 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          },
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-ec-defence",
      "label": "European Commission public defence (August 2022)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Archived argument for the then-proposed child-abuse regulation, including a citation to Levy and Robinson.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy communication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-ec-defence",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-ec-defence",
        "name": "European Commission public defence (August 2022)",
        "role": "Policy communication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Archived argument for the then-proposed child-abuse regulation, including a citation to Levy and Robinson.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Archived argument for the then-proposed child-abuse regulation, including a citation to Levy and Robinson."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Archived argument for the then-proposed child-abuse regulation, including a citation to Levy and Robinson.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy communication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Archived Commission communication. Current page credits DG Communication; no named individual attribution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-eu-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
                "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "European Commission public defence (August 2022)",
            "date": "7August 2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Actual citation in political argument; not proof of efficacy or adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-eu-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              },
              {
                "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
                "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cites to support possible encrypted-service detection",
            "sourceName": "European Commission public defence (August 2022)",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "7August 2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-position",
      "label": "eSafety encryption position (October 2023)",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Agency discussion of encrypted-service detection options with technical limitations, predating the two2024 reports.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy statement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-position",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-position",
        "name": "eSafety encryption position (October 2023)",
        "role": "Policy statement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Agency discussion of encrypted-service detection options with technical limitations, predating the two2024 reports.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Agency discussion of encrypted-service detection options with technical limitations, predating the two2024 reports."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Agency discussion of encrypted-service detection options with technical limitations, predating the two2024 reports.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy statement",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Agency cites the paper while also describing security concerns. Establishes earlier consideration, not later draft transmission.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-au-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
              },
              {
                "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cites in discussion of client-side scanning",
            "sourceName": "eSafety encryption position (October 2023)",
            "targetName": "Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms (2022)",
            "date": "13October 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy statement discusses detection options and limits before the 2024 DFC and SaferAI reports.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-au-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "eSafety encryption position (October 2023)",
            "date": "13October 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-consultation",
      "label": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Common destination of contrasting WeProtect Secretariat and Digital Rights Watch submissions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Consultation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-consultation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-consultation",
        "name": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
        "role": "Consultation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Common destination of contrasting WeProtect Secretariat and Digital Rights Watch submissions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Common destination of contrasting WeProtect Secretariat and Digital Rights Watch submissions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Common destination of contrasting WeProtect Secretariat and Digital Rights Watch submissions.",
        "structuralRole": "Consultation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Secretariat supports client-side, homomorphic and secure-enclave approaches while requiring more testing. Does not necessarily represent members.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-wp-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocates detection options in submission to",
            "sourceName": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "targetName": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
            "date": "January 2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Formal counterargument on technical feasibility and privacy; not proof every asserted performance figure is correct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-drw-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Digital Rights Watch",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposes encrypted-content detection proposals in submission to",
            "sourceName": "Digital Rights Watch",
            "targetName": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
            "date": "21December 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-drw",
      "label": "Digital Rights Watch",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Australian consultation participant opposing proposed encrypted-content detection requirements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Civil society organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-ref-drw",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-drw",
        "name": "Digital Rights Watch",
        "role": "Civil society organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Australian consultation participant opposing proposed encrypted-content detection requirements.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Australian consultation participant opposing proposed encrypted-content detection requirements."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Digital Rights Watch is an Australian digital-rights advocacy organization represented here by its response to proposed online industry standards and by a named transparency-advocacy partnership with Reset.Tech Australia. Its consultation position challenged proposals for detecting prohibited content in encrypted communications.",
        "structuralRole": "Civil-society counterargument on encryption and partner in platform-transparency advocacy",
        "significance": "The organization illustrates why civil society cannot be treated as one policy position. It can cooperate with Reset on transparency while disputing safety proposals on feasibility and privacy grounds. Following the subject and date of each collaboration makes those different relationships intelligible.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two distinct policy activities",
            "text": "Its standards submission is dated 21 December 2023, despite the February 2024 upload path, and challenges the technical and privacy claims supporting encrypted-content detection. Separately, Mannifera's account of a special 2024 funding round names Digital Rights Watch as Reset's partner in transparency advocacy. That grantor account identifies a particular partnership, rather than a shared position on every earlier or later regulatory question.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-drw-input",
              "w12-gov-e-reset-drw-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Formal counterargument on technical feasibility and privacy; not proof every asserted performance figure is correct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-ref-e-drw-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposes encrypted-content detection proposals in submission to",
            "sourceName": "Digital Rights Watch",
            "targetName": "Australian draft industry standards consultation (2023–24)",
            "date": "21December 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Names a specific partnership in Reset grant purpose/account; not a blanket shared platform or proof that all prior/future positions coincide.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-reset-drw-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "grantor names Digital Rights Watch partner in transparency advocacy",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Digital Rights Watch",
            "date": "Account of special2024 round; exact implementation dates absent"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "WeProtect's January2024 submission to the Australian draft-standards consultation advocates client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption and secure enclaves while saying the technologies are nascent and require more testing (PDF4). Its disclaimer attributes the position to the Secretariat rather than necessarily to Alliance members (PDF10). Digital Rights Watch's opposing submission is dated 21December2023, despite the February2024 upload path. It disputes feasibility and privacy claims (PDF10–14). These are contrasting formal inputs, not proof either was adopted. Both scoped observations are derivatives after one original-retrieval timeout each.",
            "matched": [
              "Digital Rights Watch"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5da9a1703ea15c140860ddf4172b58a2e691f78604c853fb696fab194685d400"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-may-a",
      "label": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment A: core content",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Exact indexed filename: Attachment A - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Draft document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-draft-may-a",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-may-a",
        "name": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment A: core content",
        "role": "Draft document",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Exact indexed filename: Attachment A - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exact indexed filename: Attachment A - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Exact indexed filename: Attachment A - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Draft document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment A. Doc19PDF30 lists core-content topics. Exact text, including E2EE wording, remains unread.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-may-a"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named core-content attachment to",
            "sourceName": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment A: core content",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "5May 2025 invitation"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-may-b",
      "label": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment B: practical tools",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Exact indexed filename: Attachment B - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Tools only - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Draft document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-draft-may-b",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-may-b",
        "name": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment B: practical tools",
        "role": "Draft document",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Exact indexed filename: Attachment B - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Tools only - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exact indexed filename: Attachment B - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Tools only - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Exact indexed filename: Attachment B - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Tools only - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx. Contents not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Draft document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment B; Doc19PDF30-31 asks particular attention and marked-up feedback on this attachment. Actual file and returned edits not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-may-b"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named tools attachment to",
            "sourceName": "May 2025 CSEA toolkit Attachment B: practical tools",
            "targetName": "May 2025 eSafety toolkit industry consultation",
            "date": "5May 2025 invitation"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
      "label": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Published3-page response to requested draft review, hosted by Common Sense Media.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-draft-csm-comments",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
        "name": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published3-page response to requested draft review, hosted by Common Sense Media.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published3-page response to requested draft review, hosted by Common Sense Media."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published3-page response to requested draft review, hosted by Common Sense Media.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "P1 identifies the named Designing for Safety draft report. Exact draft and change disposition are unavailable. This review falls outside FOI25139 Jan1-Jun23 2025 scope.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
              },
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "comments on",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "targetName": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
            "date": "31October 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "P1 names Australian eSafety Commissioner and says comments respond to a request for review. Recipient acknowledgment or receipt timestamp not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "addresses requested draft feedback to",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "31October 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Comments name Common Sense Media as sender; publisher filings directory links the exactPDF under2025 and International.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Common Sense Media",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authors and publicly lists",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "date": "Comments dated31October 2025; upload date unknown; publicly observed8September2026local"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-october-draft",
      "label": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Title identified by31October 2025 comments: Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Exact draft bytes, version label and redlines not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Draft document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-draft-october-draft",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-october-draft",
        "name": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
        "role": "Draft document",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Title identified by31October 2025 comments: Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Exact draft bytes, version label and redlines not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Title identified by31October 2025 comments: Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Exact draft bytes, version label and redlines not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Title identified by31October 2025 comments: Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Exact draft bytes, version label and redlines not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Draft document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "P2 calls for acceptable error rates, fallback procedures and data-minimization clarity, citing a NewYork proposed-rulemaking model. This records a specific requested change; adoption and underlying US law were not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-age-detail"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Common Sense Media",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests clearer age-assurance performance and privacy requirements in",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media",
            "targetName": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
            "date": "31October 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "P1 identifies the named Designing for Safety draft report. Exact draft and change disposition are unavailable. This review falls outside FOI25139 Jan1-Jun23 2025 scope.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-draft-e-csm-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
              },
              {
                "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
                "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "comments on",
            "sourceName": "Common Sense Media comments to eSafety ·31Oct2025",
            "targetName": "Designing for Safety draft reviewed October 2025",
            "date": "31October 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
            "title": "draft findings"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-survey",
      "label": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Survey fielded November–December 2022; later analyses include Childlight2025 Study C. Survey dataset, 2021 award and later analyses are separate objects; per-output financial allocation remains unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-award-survey",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-survey",
        "name": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
        "role": "Research",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Survey fielded November–December 2022; later analyses include Childlight2025 Study C. Survey dataset, 2021 award and later analyses are separate objects; per-output financial allocation remains unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Survey fielded November–December 2022; later analyses include Childlight2025 Study C. Survey dataset, 2021 award and later analyses are separate objects; per-output financial allocation remains unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Survey fielded November–December 2022; later analyses include Childlight2025 Study C. Survey dataset, 2021 award and later analyses are separate objects; per-output financial allocation remains unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Research",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The linked registration states that analysis preceded registration; current details incorporate a December 2023 revision. This limits evidence of advance planning without establishing misconduct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-registration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
                "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
                "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
                "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSF j7xh2 post-analysis registration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has a publicly recorded post-analysis registration",
            "sourceName": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "targetName": "OSF j7xh2 post-analysis registration",
            "date": "Registered 10 November 2023; revision submitted6 December 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authors report CloudResearch/PrimePanels recruitment and an expansion to UK/US samples after ethical and stakeholder approval at no extra cost. Exact cost baseline, approving individuals, fee and contracts are absent. No inference of free subsequent analyses or funder editorial approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-recruitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CloudResearch / PrimePanels recruitment service",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported to have recruited and administered participants",
            "sourceName": "CloudResearch / PrimePanels recruitment service",
            "targetName": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "date": "Fieldwork November–December 2022; account published29 July 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Study C reports a 4,918-person Australian/UK/US survey and links j7xh2 and HC220317, matching the methods paper. This is shared data ancestry, not an extra grant or proof that the 2021 award equals Study C costs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-reuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
                "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplies the survey data for a later financial-behaviour analysis",
            "sourceName": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "targetName": "Financial-behaviour study · 2025",
            "date": "Survey2022; Study C published2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-protocol",
      "label": "OSF j7xh2 post-analysis registration",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Registered 10 November 2023, approved response revision submitted6 December 2023. Both versions explicitly disclose registration after analysis. Not evidence of a pre-data analysis plan or donor control.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-award-protocol",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-protocol",
        "name": "OSF j7xh2 post-analysis registration",
        "role": "Record",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Registered 10 November 2023, approved response revision submitted6 December 2023. Both versions explicitly disclose registration after analysis. Not evidence of a pre-data analysis plan or donor control.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Registered 10 November 2023, approved response revision submitted6 December 2023. Both versions explicitly disclose registration after analysis. Not evidence of a pre-data analysis plan or donor control."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Registered 10 November 2023, approved response revision submitted6 December 2023. Both versions explicitly disclose registration after analysis. Not evidence of a pre-data analysis plan or donor control.",
        "structuralRole": "Record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The linked registration states that analysis preceded registration; current details incorporate a December 2023 revision. This limits evidence of advance planning without establishing misconduct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-registration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
                "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
                "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
                "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
                "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has a publicly recorded post-analysis registration",
            "sourceName": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "targetName": "OSF j7xh2 post-analysis registration",
            "date": "Registered 10 November 2023; revision submitted6 December 2023."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
            "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal"
          },
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-cloudresearch",
      "label": "CloudResearch / PrimePanels recruitment service",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Authors name CloudResearch as recruitment/administering provider using PrimePanels. No contract, fee, invoice or participant-panel payment schedule acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-award-cloudresearch",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-cloudresearch",
        "name": "CloudResearch / PrimePanels recruitment service",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Authors name CloudResearch as recruitment/administering provider using PrimePanels. No contract, fee, invoice or participant-panel payment schedule acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authors name CloudResearch as recruitment/administering provider using PrimePanels. No contract, fee, invoice or participant-panel payment schedule acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Authors name CloudResearch as recruitment/administering provider using PrimePanels. No contract, fee, invoice or participant-panel payment schedule acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authors report CloudResearch/PrimePanels recruitment and an expansion to UK/US samples after ethical and stakeholder approval at no extra cost. Exact cost baseline, approving individuals, fee and contracts are absent. No inference of free subsequent analyses or funder editorial approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-recruitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
                "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported to have recruited and administered participants",
            "sourceName": "CloudResearch / PrimePanels recruitment service",
            "targetName": "Multinational survey under UNSW ethics HC220317",
            "date": "Fieldwork November–December 2022; account published29 July 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return",
            "heading": "3. Survey implementation and later output budgets",
            "text": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock's 29 July2025 CrimRxiv methodology preprint , release1, reports an original design for3,000Australian men, Westpac funding, and advisory review. It says CloudResearch subsequently recruited/administered through PrimePanels after an earlier contractor declined the subject matter. This is the authors' account, not vendor correspondence or an executed service contract.",
            "matched": [
              "CloudResearch"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f4ef15ec90f44d2d3fb4ceeb84512eb4849f98b0e3357dcbff99e641bb7d66e7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-wp2",
      "label": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "A dated, credited analytical output linked by UKRI; separate from December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. Its rationale describes code sharing and later toolbox updating, without identifying grant payment or editorial rights.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w6-award-wp2",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-wp2",
        "name": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A dated, credited analytical output linked by UKRI; separate from December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. Its rationale describes code sharing and later toolbox updating, without identifying grant payment or editorial rights.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "A dated, credited analytical output linked by UKRI; separate from December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. Its rationale describes code sharing and later toolbox updating, without identifying grant payment or editorial rights."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A dated, credited analytical output linked by UKRI; separate from December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. Its rationale describes code sharing and later toolbox updating, without identifying grant payment or editorial rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The dated report exposes a rationale, code and analyses; this scoped inspection checks its identity and declared work rather than validating the scientific results. UKRI identifies it as a 2024 outcome. Publication is distinct from funder acceptance or proof of contractual requirements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-deliverable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
                "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
              },
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
                "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "produced a publicly available work-package2 analytical report",
            "sourceName": "Toolbox for Measuring Online CSEA",
            "targetName": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
            "date": "Report dated 1 October 2024."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report credits Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben. This authorship does not allocate drafting or approval of the separate DFC WorkPackage3 report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w6-award-e-wp2-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
                "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Amy Orben",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is a credited co-author of",
            "sourceName": "Amy Orben",
            "targetName": "Toolbox WP2 reliability analyses, October 2024",
            "date": "Report dated 1 October 2024."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
            "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-reddit",
      "label": "Reddit",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "UK age-access implementation and separate ICO enforcement examined; provider descriptions are not live technical audits.",
      "aliases": [
        "Reddit"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Platform"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-reddit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-reddit",
        "name": "Reddit",
        "role": "Platform",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "UK age-access implementation and separate ICO enforcement examined; provider descriptions are not live technical audits.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "UK age-access implementation and separate ICO enforcement examined; provider descriptions are not live technical audits."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Reddit"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reddit is the platform examined for UK age checks and a separate data-protection enforcement action. Its published verification arrangement uses Persona as a processor under Reddit's instructions. The relevant records distinguish implementation of an access gate from the earlier processing failures addressed by the regulator.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform choosing an age-verification workflow while bearing controller responsibilities",
        "significance": "Reddit illustrates how an online-safety access requirement intersects with privacy obligations. A third-party check does not eliminate the platform's responsibility for processing, and returned data may be more informative than a simple adult-status token. The enforcement record concerns UK data protection rather than an order to buy a particular verification service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Verification outputs and the appealed penalty",
            "text": "The ICO notice records Reddit's account that Persona identity-document and facial checks were introduced for UK not-safe-for-work access on 14 July 2025. Persona's customer FAQ says the document route returns birthdate and the selfie route estimated age, with personal data deleted within three days; these are provider representations. The ICO imposed GBP14,472,500 on 23 February 2026 for specified earlier UK GDPR processing and impact-assessment failures. An appeal was recorded on 1 April 2026; payment and a final tribunal outcome were not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
                "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-reddit-gate",
              "w7-impl-e-output",
              "w7-impl-e-penalty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GBP 14,472,500 notice concerns processing from 25 May 2018 through 8 July 2025 and DPIA failures through 31 December 2024. Appeal recorded 1 April 2026; no payment or final tribunal outcome established. This is a data-protection penalty, not an OSA fine or direction to procure Persona. Financial details: value: 14,472,500; currency: GBP; kind: penalty imposed not payment; period: 23February2026 notice",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-penalty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "imposed an appealed UK GDPR penalty on",
            "sourceName": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "targetName": "Reddit",
            "date": "23 February 2026 decision;1 April 2026 appeal update"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "ID route returns birthdate; selfie route estimated age. FAQ promises personal data deletion within 3 days. Claimed outputs/deletion, not independently observed behaviour or universal binary token.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
                "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "says it returns birthdate or estimated age to",
            "sourceName": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Reddit",
            "date": "Current undated FAQ read 9 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ICO notice records Reddit representations: Persona ID/facial checks introduced 14 July 2025, after the notice’s processing period. Not proof all current alternatives work in UK.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-reddit-gate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "introduced an age check for UK NSFW access",
            "sourceName": "Reddit",
            "targetName": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
            "date": "14 July 2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "Reddit: named processor and constrained claims",
            "text": "Persona's original FAQ HTML was captured; Reddit ordinaryGET403, readable web substitute retained as derivative. No guessed email-inference supplier, fee or link to VerifyMy is earned. Current provider summaries must not be backdated to2025 retention arrangements.",
            "matched": [
              "Reddit"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "02ee36385239dc771a47caa9ce5c0ea585191d0f66a7e21ca282115e3ae1d635"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "Reddit: named processor and constrained claims",
            "text": "Current Reddit Help, updated24June2026, names Persona for ID/selfie verification, describes account-signal and third-party email inference, and lists app-store age signals depending on region/device. This generic page does not establish that every option is available to every UK user. Reddit says it stores verified age/status and receives no verification photos. The customer-specific Persona FAQ identifies Reddit as controller and Persona as processor under Reddit's instructions; it says ID-route birthdate or selfie-route estimated age is returned and personal information deleted within three days. These are published provider representations; contractual schedules and deletion evidence were not obtained. The date of birth return should not be reduced to a universal binary over18 token.",
            "matched": [
              "Reddit"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1ebd8f9b77a984863022e83cf9f6ebe35f3f4934c4cfddb9dddc116c6f78e974"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-persona",
      "label": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named Reddit processor. Exact contract/fees and independently verified deletion remain unknown.",
      "aliases": [
        "Persona"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Verification provider"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-persona",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-persona",
        "name": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
        "role": "Verification provider",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named Reddit processor. Exact contract/fees and independently verified deletion remain unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named Reddit processor. Exact contract/fees and independently verified deletion remain unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Persona"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
            "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named Reddit processor. Exact contract/fees and independently verified deletion remain unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Verification provider",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "ID route returns birthdate; selfie route estimated age. FAQ promises personal data deletion within 3 days. Claimed outputs/deletion, not independently observed behaviour or universal binary token.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
                "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reddit",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "says it returns birthdate or estimated age to",
            "sourceName": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Reddit",
            "date": "Current undated FAQ read 9 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Platform/provider identify Persona. FAQ places control of purposes and instructions with Reddit; executed schedule and payment terms unavailable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-processor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
                "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
              },
              {
                "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
                "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "uses a named verification processor",
            "sourceName": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
            "targetName": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
            "date": "UK implementation14 July 2025; current FAQ read 9 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "Reddit: named processor and constrained claims",
            "text": "Persona's original FAQ HTML was captured; Reddit ordinaryGET403, readable web substitute retained as derivative. No guessed email-inference supplier, fee or link to VerifyMy is earned. Current provider summaries must not be backdated to2025 retention arrangements.",
            "matched": [
              "Persona"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "02ee36385239dc771a47caa9ce5c0ea585191d0f66a7e21ca282115e3ae1d635"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
            "heading": "A second regulatory mechanism, with a specific period",
            "text": "The ICO's signed penalty notice23February2026 imposes GBP14,472,500 for specified UKGDPR infringements. Its processing period ends8July2025; its DPIA period ends31December2024. Paragraph74/PDF40 records Reddit's UK NSFW age-verification through Persona starting14July2025, after the relevant period. Paragraph301(a)/PDF152 expressly rejects treating later OSA compliance work as mitigation of those earlier infringements. Thus the fine was not an OSA fine for deploying Persona incorrectly, and the notice does not direct procurement of Persona.",
            "matched": [
              "Persona"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "564d8ed6cc0a81afcb8abd4433c9c423d0c06c670a38e97c9561675c9bd550cf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
            "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-ico",
      "label": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "UK data-protection regulator. Its Reddit decision concerns UK GDPR, distinct from Ofcom OSA duties.",
      "aliases": [
        "ICO"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Regulator"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-ico",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-ico",
        "name": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
        "role": "Regulator",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "UK data-protection regulator. Its Reddit decision concerns UK GDPR, distinct from Ofcom OSA duties.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "UK data-protection regulator. Its Reddit decision concerns UK GDPR, distinct from Ofcom OSA duties."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ICO"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Information Commissioner's Office is the UK's data-protection regulator and an information-rights adjudicator. Its records here include a Reddit monetary penalty, described coordination with Ofcom and a decision on disclosure of a Crisp report. Those proceedings concern different legal functions.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulator applying privacy law and reviewing information-access refusals",
        "significance": "ICO's role adds a separate legal system to online-safety implementation. A platform can face data-protection enforcement while also dealing with Ofcom's safety duties, and regulator meetings do not collapse those powers into one decision. Information-access rulings likewise concern disclosure rather than approval of the underlying service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Decisions and coordination",
            "text": "On 23 February 2026 ICO imposed a £14,472,500 UK GDPR penalty on Reddit concerning historical processing and impact-assessment failures; an appeal was recorded on 1 April. Its March records describe team-dependent fortnightly or quarterly meetings with Ofcom. Separately, a November 2025 decision upheld remaining national-security redactions after inspecting a requested Crisp report. None establishes a direction to buy an age-assurance vendor's service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-penalty",
              "w7-impl-e-meetings",
              "w15-impl-e-ico-decision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GBP 14,472,500 notice concerns processing from 25 May 2018 through 8 July 2025 and DPIA failures through 31 December 2024. Appeal recorded 1 April 2026; no payment or final tribunal outcome established. This is a data-protection penalty, not an OSA fine or direction to procure Persona. Financial details: value: 14,472,500; currency: GBP; kind: penalty imposed not payment; period: 23February2026 notice",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-penalty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reddit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "imposed an appealed UK GDPR penalty on",
            "sourceName": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "targetName": "Reddit",
            "date": "23 February 2026 decision;1 April 2026 appeal update"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "11November2025 decision after independent inspection and partial release. June2024 referral count10 also disclosed; counts are referrals not removals. Appeal route exists. Ruling on disclosure, not operating legality or all-content review.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-ico-decision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "upholds remaining national-security redactions",
            "sourceName": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "targetName": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "date": "2025-11-11 – 2025-11-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ICO describes team-dependent fortnightly/quarterly meetings when refusing a broad records request. Does not attribute every meeting to Reddit or establish particular decision instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-meetings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports regular inter-regulator meetings with",
            "sourceName": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": "FOI response24 March 2026; individual dates not obtained"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-reddit-age",
      "label": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "ICO notice records 14 July 2025 Persona implementation; current general help describes additional region-dependent options.",
      "aliases": [
        "Reddit UK age gate"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Access condition"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-reddit-age",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-reddit-age",
        "name": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
        "role": "Access condition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICO notice records 14 July 2025 Persona implementation; current general help describes additional region-dependent options.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICO notice records 14 July 2025 Persona implementation; current general help describes additional region-dependent options."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Reddit UK age gate"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
            "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ICO notice records 14 July 2025 Persona implementation; current general help describes additional region-dependent options.",
        "structuralRole": "Access condition",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ICO notice records Reddit representations: Persona ID/facial checks introduced 14 July 2025, after the notice’s processing period. Not proof all current alternatives work in UK.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-reddit-gate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reddit",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "introduced an age check for UK NSFW access",
            "sourceName": "Reddit",
            "targetName": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
            "date": "14 July 2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Platform/provider identify Persona. FAQ places control of purposes and instructions with Reddit; executed schedule and payment terms unavailable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-processor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
                "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
              },
              {
                "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
                "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "uses a named verification processor",
            "sourceName": "Reddit UK mature-content age gate",
            "targetName": "Persona Identities, Inc.",
            "date": "UK implementation14 July 2025; current FAQ read 9 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
            "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-government",
      "label": "UK government",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Cabinet Office issuedMarch 2026 national digital ID consultation; September ministerial answer confirms cancellation. Department/date scopes remain explicit.",
      "aliases": [
        "UK government"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-government",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-government",
        "name": "UK government",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Cabinet Office issuedMarch 2026 national digital ID consultation; September ministerial answer confirms cancellation. Department/date scopes remain explicit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Cabinet Office issuedMarch 2026 national digital ID consultation; September ministerial answer confirms cancellation. Department/date scopes remain explicit."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "UK government"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Cabinet Office issuedMarch 2026 national digital ID consultation; September ministerial answer confirms cancellation. Department/date scopes remain explicit.",
        "structuralRole": "Government",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated proposal and cancellation are separate events; minister confirms no final businesscase before cancellation. OneLogin/Wallet/privateDVS are not merged into this cancelledprogramme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-government-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
                "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "consulted on and later cancelled",
            "sourceName": "UK government",
            "targetName": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
            "date": "March 2026 consultation; July 2026 cancellation; September 2026 confirmation"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "Candidate typed relations (not yet canonical)",
            "text": "No adoption edge proposed for India, UNESCO, UK Government, UNGA, UNSC or Geneva based on this pass. No campaign-funding edge proposed from the UNESCO umbrella funding paragraph. A current institutional co-chair appointment is a separate governance relation, not evidence the appointment was caused by campaign participation.",
            "matched": [
              "UK government"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c1ee5e31cab00aa9a9c4cd5506b09d1ced0a6d0d1ccaad4cb4065be5008a8771"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The money reached the company. And the government paid the company to help design its evaluations. We have recovered Good Ventures’ filed payment and grant-oversight records for Pattern Labs, now Irregular, plus a third UK government contract. The new contract pays for work upstream of a score: choosing important capabilities, designing the evaluations and explaining why those tests cover the threat.",
            "matched": [
              "UK government"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2af026e03dfe8b28dc292618ba8269de6f22244e38b1463977f63d7d85efc569"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
            "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The paper advocates technically possible client-side protections, but explicitly disclaims UK government policy or requirements and a complete security analysis (PDF10). Its discussion recognises coercion, database manipulation and mission creep; it reports no evidence for its considered charity-funding capture scenario (PDF41–42). It also points to REPHRAIN's separate Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation work (PDF6,56). That is not the later Toolbox award or proof of a common programme. Read cover, selected introduction/executive-summary pages, section6.1 and the opening of section8; no full technical validation claimed. Original arXiv PDF retained.",
            "matched": [
              "UK government"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a225aa1d393f482c14eabd6fa3db27485cd2a9541a2be7af16dc90f3144f6623"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved",
            "heading": "Historical funding disclosure present in the same evidence",
            "text": "FON0071's GDI and Government Funding section says GDI had received no UK government funding since 2022; describes FCDO Russia-unit Countering Disinformation and Media Development work in 2018–2022 to develop large-scale detection and country studies; and says the supporting grant expired in March 2023. The receipt-period statement and later grant-expiry date are not a self-evident contradiction. It also attributes then-current resources to private foundations, commercial data licensing and a small EU Horizon Europe grant. This is a historical recipient disclosure, not donor-side confirmation, acquired conditions, proof of payment dates or government approval of a particular rating. No funding genealogy was pursued.",
            "matched": [
              "UK government"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8d478599c4358ac67492db3d0859bd24501a42dd9934f06cc163d934dfd81a15"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-national-id",
      "label": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "March 2026 consultation described possible online-age use. Cancellation confirmed by parliamentary sources; not an active universal online-ID requirement.",
      "aliases": [
        "National ID · cancelled"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Cancelled programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-national-id",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-national-id",
        "name": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
        "role": "Cancelled programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "March 2026 consultation described possible online-age use. Cancellation confirmed by parliamentary sources; not an active universal online-ID requirement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "March 2026 consultation described possible online-age use. Cancellation confirmed by parliamentary sources; not an active universal online-ID requirement."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "National ID · cancelled"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "March 2026 consultation described possible online-age use. Cancellation confirmed by parliamentary sources; not an active universal online-ID requirement.",
        "structuralRole": "Cancelled programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated proposal and cancellation are separate events; minister confirms no final businesscase before cancellation. OneLogin/Wallet/privateDVS are not merged into this cancelledprogramme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-government-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
                "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK government",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "consulted on and later cancelled",
            "sourceName": "UK government",
            "targetName": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
            "date": "March 2026 consultation; July 2026 cancellation; September 2026 confirmation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Chapter4.1 proposed younger-teen online-age use while retaining alternative methods. Historical scope after national programme cancellation; no universal online-ID mandate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-historical-age-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
                "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed national credential for online age proof",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "included a non-exclusive online-age use proposal",
            "sourceName": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
            "targetName": "Proposed national credential for online age proof",
            "date": "March 2026 proposed use; programme cancelledJuly 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-age-use",
      "label": "Proposed national credential for online age proof",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "March 2026 proposed use explicitly non-exclusive; parent national scheme later cancelled.",
      "aliases": [
        "Online-age proposal"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Historical policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-age-use",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-age-use",
        "name": "Proposed national credential for online age proof",
        "role": "Historical policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "March 2026 proposed use explicitly non-exclusive; parent national scheme later cancelled.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "March 2026 proposed use explicitly non-exclusive; parent national scheme later cancelled."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Online-age proposal"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "credentials",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "March 2026 proposed use explicitly non-exclusive; parent national scheme later cancelled.",
        "structuralRole": "Historical policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Chapter4.1 proposed younger-teen online-age use while retaining alternative methods. Historical scope after national programme cancellation; no universal online-ID mandate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-historical-age-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
                "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "included a non-exclusive online-age use proposal",
            "sourceName": "National digital-ID scheme · cancelled July 2026",
            "targetName": "Proposed national credential for online age proof",
            "date": "March 2026 proposed use; programme cancelledJuly 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-discord-settings",
      "label": "Discord UK age-gated settings and content",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Company documents checks for particular content/settings; declining does not close the whole account.",
      "aliases": [
        "Discord UK settings"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Access condition"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-impl-discord-settings",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-discord-settings",
        "name": "Discord UK age-gated settings and content",
        "role": "Access condition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company documents checks for particular content/settings; declining does not close the whole account.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company documents checks for particular content/settings; declining does not close the whole account."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Discord UK settings"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "custody",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Company documents checks for particular content/settings; declining does not close the whole account.",
        "structuralRole": "Access condition",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Content/settings gates include unblurring and MessageRequests changes. Opting out retains account/DMs/voice subject to restrictions. Platform documentation, not a finding that each setting is legally mandated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-impl-e-discord-settings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
                "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes age checks for specified UK features",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Discord UK age-gated settings and content",
            "date": "UK pageupdated28 July 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
            "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-osa",
      "label": "UK Online Safety Act 2023",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Statutory duties and regulator powers; current sections 12 and 81 read alongside targeted enacted provisions.",
      "aliases": [
        "Online Safety Act"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statute"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-policy-osa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-osa",
        "name": "UK Online Safety Act 2023",
        "role": "Statute",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statutory duties and regulator powers; current sections 12 and 81 read alongside targeted enacted provisions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statutory duties and regulator powers; current sections 12 and 81 read alongside targeted enacted provisions."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Online Safety Act"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act section 12: current official text",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act section 81: current official text",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/81"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK Online Safety Act 2023 is the statute that creates online-safety duties and regulatory powers examined in this case. It received Royal Assent on 26 October 2023, with relevant duties and codes commencing on their own schedules. Ofcom implements the framework through guidance, codes and enforcement.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory foundation distinguishing legal duties from advocacy and commercial certification",
        "significance": "The Act is the point at which policy ideas acquire enforceable legal form. Its provisions also define the limits of later guidance: a regulator can describe evidence and recommend measures, but a private certificate does not become a statutory vendor approval merely because a provider advertises it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Relevant statutory chain",
            "text": "Section 82 requires Ofcom guidance for section 81 duties, including examples and compliance principles. Schedule 4 links relevant children's-code age measures to highly effective age assurance. The March 2026 Fraud Strategy separately describes fraudulent-advertising duties and court business-disruption mechanisms for serious noncompliance. Those mechanisms respond to breaches of duties; they are not triggered simply because a business lacks verification under a voluntary commercial scheme.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act section 12: current official text",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/12"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act section 81: current official text",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/81"
              },
              {
                "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-authority",
              "w29-enf-e-fraud-strategy-osa-account",
              "ed2-osa-ofcom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 82 requires guidance for section 81, including examples and compliance principles. Schedule 4 paragraph 12 links relevant children-code age measures to HEAA. The statute does not certify providers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires age-assurance guidance and relevant code measures from",
            "sourceName": "UK Online Safety Act 2023",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": "Royal Assent 26 October 2023; relevant commencement and duty dates recorded separately."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph54 describes Category1/2A duties and serious-noncompliance court business-disruption mechanisms. Such measures respond to breach of statutory duties, not simply an unverified business. This is the strategy’s legal account, not a new independent statute audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-fraud-strategy-osa-account"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "separately describes enacted fraudulent-advertising duties",
            "sourceName": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "targetName": "UK Online Safety Act 2023",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act section 12: current official text",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act section 81: current official text",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/81"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-heaa",
      "label": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Four technical criteria plus implementation requirements; method examples do not approve named vendors.",
      "aliases": [
        "Ofcom assurance framework"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Regulatory guidance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-policy-heaa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-heaa",
        "name": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
        "role": "Regulatory guidance",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Four technical criteria plus implementation requirements; method examples do not approve named vendors.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Four technical criteria plus implementation requirements; method examples do not approve named vendors."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Ofcom assurance framework"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ofcom's highly effective age assurance framework defines how covered services should assess age-checking processes under the UK Online Safety Act. Its January 2025 decision uses four technical criteria—accuracy, robustness, reliability and fairness—alongside implementation requirements for the whole process.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulatory performance framework shaping age-assurance procurement and implementation",
        "significance": "The framework creates demand for evidence about real-world performance while leaving more than one method and evidence route available. That matters commercially: a vendor's certification can contribute evidence, but it does not automatically become a regulator's approval or an exclusive condition of market access.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Criteria and accepted evidence",
            "text": "Ofcom declined proposed fixed 95% and 99% thresholds in the initial guidance, citing inadequate comparable testing evidence and innovation considerations. It also declined mandatory independent certification: providers may rely on their own, vendor or independent tests. The children's code recommends assurance for specified access and content controls, with alternative compliant measures available under section 49. The September 2026 resource retained the distinction between certification evidence and compliance; the framework does not require identification across the entire internet.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance"
              },
              {
                "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-guidance",
              "w7-policy-e-code-age",
              "w7-policy-e-thresholds-declined",
              "w7-policy-e-certification-conditional"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraphs 3.350 to 3.353 decline the request from Yoti for mandatory independent certification. Providers can use their own, vendor or independent tests as evidence. Trust framework certification does not automatically establish compliance. The September 2026 vendor resource maintains this distinction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-certification-conditional"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "allows certification as evidence without making it mandatory or sufficient for",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025; FOI response of 26 August 2025; resource of 2 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PCU B2 and B3 concern service-wide adult access; B4 to B7 concern conditional content or feed protections. B4 to B7 permit restrictions for users who do not seek adult access. Section 49 allows alternative compliant measures. The code does not mandate identification across the internet.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-code-age"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Issued UK Protection of Children user-to-user Code",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends for specified access and content controls",
            "sourceName": "Issued UK Protection of Children user-to-user Code",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "In force 25 July 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraphs 3.251 to 3.259 retain a criteria-based approach despite proposed 95% and 99% thresholds, citing inadequate comparable evidence and testing, and innovation considerations. Future thresholds remain possible; the September 2026 resource does not itself impose one.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-thresholds-declined"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined proposed fixed numerical thresholds in initial guidance for",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025; currentness checked against the 2 September 2026 resource."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The January 2025 decision sets technical accuracy, robustness, reliability and fairness criteria, with final Part 3 and Part 5 guidance. The whole process must meet the criteria. Not all services must use age assurance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes and applies",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "16 January 2025; Part 3 updated 24 April 2025; current page updated 2 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-child-code",
      "label": "Issued UK Protection of Children user-to-user Code",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Issued 4 July 2025 and in force 25 July 2025. Age-assurance measures have distinct content, risk and functionality scopes.",
      "aliases": [
        "Children’s Code"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Code of practice"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-policy-child-code",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-child-code",
        "name": "Issued UK Protection of Children user-to-user Code",
        "role": "Code of practice",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Issued 4 July 2025 and in force 25 July 2025. Age-assurance measures have distinct content, risk and functionality scopes.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Issued 4 July 2025 and in force 25 July 2025. Age-assurance measures have distinct content, risk and functionality scopes."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Children’s Code"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Issued 4 July 2025 and in force 25 July 2025. Age-assurance measures have distinct content, risk and functionality scopes.",
        "structuralRole": "Code of practice",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PCU B2 and B3 concern service-wide adult access; B4 to B7 concern conditional content or feed protections. B4 to B7 permit restrictions for users who do not seek adult access. Section 49 allows alternative compliant measures. The code does not mandate identification across the internet.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-code-age"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends for specified access and content controls",
            "sourceName": "Issued UK Protection of Children user-to-user Code",
            "targetName": "Ofcom highly effective age assurance framework",
            "date": "In force 25 July 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Issued 4 July 2025 and effective 25 July 2025. Children's risk assessments were due 24 July 2025; first access assessments were due 16 April 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-issued-code"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Issued UK Protection of Children user-to-user Code",
            "date": "Issued 4 July 2025; in force 25 July 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
      "label": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Added after AVPA and VerifyMy evidence. This is conditional method acceptance, not provider accreditation or purchase.",
      "aliases": [
        "Email age estimation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical method"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-policy-email-estimation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
        "name": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
        "role": "Technical method",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Added after AVPA and VerifyMy evidence. This is conditional method acceptance, not provider accreditation or purchase.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Added after AVPA and VerifyMy evidence. This is conditional method acceptance, not provider accreditation or purchase."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Email age estimation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Email-based age estimation is a method Ofcom added to its list of approaches capable of highly effective age assurance in January 2025. It uses information associated with an email address to estimate age, with actual compliance dependent on how the complete process is implemented.",
        "structuralRole": "Method-level regulatory acceptance following named industry evidence",
        "significance": "This is an unusually explicit example of consultation changing guidance: the regulator names evidence from AVPA and VerifyMy as contributing to the addition. That can widen the market for a class of services, but it does not select a supplier or establish the performance of every deployment using the method.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Acceptance and implementation boundary",
            "text": "Ofcom's statement at paragraphs 3.85–3.87 credits the submitted evidence; final Part 5 guidance includes the method at paragraph 4.17. VerifyMy's product description combines ownership checks and digital-footprint analysis, illustrating one commercial implementation. The complete original technical submission was not obtained, so the regulator's account establishes attributed uptake rather than an independent replication of the underlying performance claims.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-email-accepted",
              "w7-policy-e-avpa-evidence",
              "w7-policy-e-verifymy-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom paragraphs 3.85–3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence when adding email-based estimation. This connects the named provider to a method-level decision; it does not endorse a vendor, establish performance in a particular deployment, or identify Reddit’s unnamed email supplier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-verifymy-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
            "sourceName": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "targetName": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "date": "16 January 2025 statement; current provider identity separately read 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom expressly credits AVPA and VerifyMy evidence in adding email-based age estimation. The complete original submitted technical evidence remains not obtained; the regulator account supports attributed contribution without independently verifying performance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-avpa-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
            "sourceName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "targetName": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "date": "Evidence considered by 16 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statement paragraphs 3.85 to 3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence; final Part 5 paragraph 4.17 includes the method. Capability depends on effective implementation. No approval of a named vendor or purchased service is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-email-accepted"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "added to methods capable of highly effective age assurance",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-xgroovy",
      "label": "Provider of Xgroovy.com",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Ofcom case CW/01318/09/25 identifies the provider by service. The exact legal company remains unresolved.",
      "aliases": [
        "Xgroovy provider"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Service provider"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-policy-xgroovy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-xgroovy",
        "name": "Provider of Xgroovy.com",
        "role": "Service provider",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Ofcom case CW/01318/09/25 identifies the provider by service. The exact legal company remains unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Ofcom case CW/01318/09/25 identifies the provider by service. The exact legal company remains unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Xgroovy provider"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ofcom case CW/01318/09/25 identifies the provider by service. The exact legal company remains unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Service provider",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Ofcom reports issuing a confirmation decision on 3 September 2026 and announced it on 4 September, concerning a section 12 breach. The underlying non-confidential decision has not yet been published. The reported penalty is not evidence of payment or a court judgment. Financial details: value: 700,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported imposed regulatory penalty; period: Confirmation decision issued 3 September 2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-age-fine"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports imposing an age-assurance duty penalty on",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Provider of Xgroovy.com",
            "date": "Decision issued 3 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The reported section 102(8)(a) penalty concerns failure to respond. It is separate from the GBP 700,000 age-assurance fine. The conditional GBP 200 daily penalty is not added to this fixed amount; collection has not been observed. Financial details: value: 30,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported imposed regulatory penalty; period: Confirmation decision issued 3 September 2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-information-fine"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports imposing a separate information-request penalty on",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Provider of Xgroovy.com",
            "date": "Decision issued 3 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-avid",
      "label": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Exact legal company14865982; supplies ACCS audit/certification/test purchasing under an SLA and holds scheme-company director appointment/removal rights.",
      "aliases": [
        "AVID · services"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-avid",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-avid",
        "name": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Exact legal company14865982; supplies ACCS audit/certification/test purchasing under an SLA and holds scheme-company director appointment/removal rights.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exact legal company14865982; supplies ACCS audit/certification/test purchasing under an SLA and holds scheme-company director appointment/removal rights."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "AVID · services"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AVID Certification Services Limited is UK company 14865982, the commercial provider identified as supplying audit, certification and test-purchasing services to Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd. Public registers also give AVID director-appointment and removal rights over the separate scheme company.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial assessment provider with a disclosed governance link to its scheme body",
        "significance": "AVID sits where certification rules become a paid assessment service. Its relationship to the scheme company is therefore material to understanding both commercial dependence and governance. Published impartiality and appeal rules qualify that structure and provide standards against which an actual certification decision could be examined.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Control, services and safeguards",
            "text": "The register places Tony Allen in a more-than-50%, less-than-75% share and voting band and Nicholas John Bate above 25% and at most 50%. The website describes an AVID service-level agreement with the scheme. The 2026 rules separate certification decisions from the evaluator, provide independent appeals and restrict designing services that are certified. AVID advertises ISO/IEC 27566-1 certification, but the record does not show an exclusive regulatory designation or a particular customer's payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-avid",
              "w7-market-e-bate-avid",
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-control",
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-sla",
              "w7-market-e-scheme-rules",
              "w7-market-e-avid-iso-service"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2026 rules keep decisions inside assessment body but separate from evaluator; annual fee review/28day invoices; nonpayment can trigger certification action. Independent appeals and impartiality controls, including no designing certified services and two-year prior-client decision restriction, qualify this discretion. Rules are not an audit of actual compliance or a retrospective2024 instrument.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-scheme-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets published certification decision, fee, appeal and impartiality rules for",
            "sourceName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "targetName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "date": "Downloaded2026 rules; no historical applicability assumed."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current PSC register: more than50% but less than75% shares/votes; right to appoint/remove directors. Not exact stake or evidence of personal involvement in a named certification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-avid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds disclosed majority share/voting band and director appointment rights in",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "date": "Notified12 May 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Corporate PSC record puts AVID's director appointment/removal rights over the scheme company. Does not establish case-specific certificate direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds director appointment/removal rights in",
            "sourceName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "targetName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "date": "AVID notified1 June 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "More than25% but no more than50%. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry not treated as an independent person or a concluded transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-bate-avid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nicholas John Bate",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds disclosed minority share and voting band in",
            "sourceName": "Nicholas John Bate",
            "targetName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "date": "Notified14 July 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Commercial service offering identified with legal AVID provider footer. Certification fees are principal income; no actual customer payment or regulator exclusivity established. Ofcom's actual certification position belongs to policy lane.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-iso-service"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers paid certification services incorporating",
            "sourceName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "targetName": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "date": "Current service page captured9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Official website identifies separate provider and nonprofit scheme. Executed SLA payment, indemnity, renewal and termination terms remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-sla"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplies audit, certification and test purchasing services under a stated SLA to",
            "sourceName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "targetName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "date": "Current undated legal footer captured9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-scheme",
      "label": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Exact legal company11493870, described as nonprofit limited by guarantee. Distinct from AVID service company. Historical accs node remains an umbrella.",
      "aliases": [
        "ACCS · scheme company"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-scheme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-scheme",
        "name": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Exact legal company11493870, described as nonprofit limited by guarantee. Distinct from AVID service company. Historical accs node remains an umbrella.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exact legal company11493870, described as nonprofit limited by guarantee. Distinct from AVID service company. Historical accs node remains an umbrella."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ACCS · scheme company"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd is company 11493870, described by its governance page as a nonprofit company limited by guarantee. It is legally separate from AVID Certification Services Limited, which supplies audit, certification and test-purchasing services under a stated service-level agreement.",
        "structuralRole": "Scheme body defining certification rules and connected to a commercial assessment provider",
        "significance": "The separation explains how a scheme can present nonprofit governance while its services depend on a commercial provider. Published rules then determine assessment decisions, fees and remedies. These are more concrete controls than the ACCS brand alone, which has historically covered several functions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and service rules",
            "text": "The register gives AVID director-appointment and removal rights over the scheme company. The 2026 rules keep certification decisions separate from the evaluator, provide independent appeals and impose impartiality restrictions, including limits on designing certified services. Fees are reviewed annually and nonpayment can trigger certification action. VerifyMy advertises certification under requirements incorporating ISO/IEC 27566-1; its claim is not an Ofcom product endorsement or an inspected certificate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-control",
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-sla",
              "w7-market-e-scheme-rules",
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-cert"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2026 rules keep decisions inside assessment body but separate from evaluator; annual fee review/28day invoices; nonpayment can trigger certification action. Independent appeals and impartiality controls, including no designing certified services and two-year prior-client decision restriction, qualify this discretion. Rules are not an audit of actual compliance or a retrospective2024 instrument.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-scheme-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets published certification decision, fee, appeal and impartiality rules for",
            "sourceName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "targetName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "date": "Downloaded2026 rules; no historical applicability assumed."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Corporate PSC record puts AVID's director appointment/removal rights over the scheme company. Does not establish case-specific certificate direction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds director appointment/removal rights in",
            "sourceName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "targetName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "date": "AVID notified1 June 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Provider says ACCS1:2025 technical requirements incorporate ISO27566-1, classifying its email and face methods highly effective. Actual certificate, independent method evaluation and fee are not obtained; not Ofcom product endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-cert"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports its platform has certification incorporating ISO27566-1 from",
            "sourceName": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "targetName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "date": "Current product page captured9 September 2026; not backdated to January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Official website identifies separate provider and nonprofit scheme. Executed SLA payment, indemnity, renewal and termination terms remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-sla"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplies audit, certification and test purchasing services under a stated SLA to",
            "sourceName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "targetName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "date": "Current undated legal footer captured9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "1. The legal control arrow matters",
            "text": "The existing node accs combines a brand, scheme and service provider. The current ACCS governance page identifies Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd (11493870), a nonprofit company limited by guarantee, and says audit, certification and test purchasing are supplied under a Service Level Agreement by AVID Certification Services Limited (14865982). These are not interchangeable legal persons.",
            "matched": [
              "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6dcfc20487504917bdd59d10350df04190c9bd36b6135783ad2177704cc6536c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-allen",
      "label": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AVID PSC and ACCS executive identified in company register/BSI respectively. Holds disclosed majority stake band; BSI lists ISO27566-1 editorial and national-panel roles.",
      "aliases": [
        "Tony Allen"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-allen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-allen",
        "name": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "AVID PSC and ACCS executive identified in company register/BSI respectively. Holds disclosed majority stake band; BSI lists ISO27566-1 editorial and national-panel roles.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "AVID PSC and ACCS executive identified in company register/BSI respectively. Holds disclosed majority stake band; BSI lists ISO27566-1 editorial and national-panel roles."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Tony Allen"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tony Iain Allen, also identified professionally as Tony Allen, is a disclosed controller of AVID Certification Services. A BSI event biography identifies him as ACCS Executive Director, lead editor of ISO/IEC 27566-1 and chair of the national age-assurance panel IST/33/5/5.",
        "structuralRole": "Certification-business principal contributing to the standards used in the same market",
        "significance": "Allen connects the commercial provision of assessment with standard-development expertise. That overlap is structurally important because standards can shape demand and assessment criteria, while editorial and panel roles do not by themselves confer unilateral approval of a standard or a statutory supplier-selection power.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated roles and approval record",
            "text": "AVID's register gives Allen more than 50% but less than 75% of shares and votes and director-appointment rights. BSI's October 2025 biography records his standard and panel roles. The August 2024 AgeAware document-control table names T Allen as required ACCS approver, but leaves the completion date blank. The record therefore identifies a proposed approval responsibility, rather than a signed decision or a proven breach of later certification rules.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
                "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-avid",
              "w7-market-e-allen-iso",
              "w7-market-e-allen-panel",
              "w7-market-e-allen-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document-control table identifies T Allen, ACCS Programme Director, with Approver in the Action column; completion Date is blank and no signed approval is shown. This is proposed approval authority, not a completed decision. It raises a bounded conflict-management question beside later2026 certification design restrictions; not a demonstrated breach.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named as the required ACCS approver for the draft specification of",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Draft5 August 2024; rules2026 must not be applied retrospectively without support."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current PSC register: more than50% but less than75% shares/votes; right to appoint/remove directors. Not exact stake or evidence of personal involvement in a named certification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-avid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds disclosed majority share/voting band and director appointment rights in",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "date": "Notified12 May 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "BSI identifies a commercial certification executive as standard lead editor. Role is not sole authorship, unilateral approval or statutory supplier selection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-iso"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
                "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed by BSI as lead editor of",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "date": "BSI event23 October 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "BSI biography identifies national age-assurance panel chair; meeting decisions and particular votes not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-panel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
                "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed by BSI as chair of",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
            "date": "BSI event23 October 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "3. A standards editor is also a certification-business principal",
            "text": "BSI's event page for 23 October2025 identifies Tony Allen as ACCS Executive Director, lead editor of ISO/IEC27566-1 and chair of BSI panel IST/33/5/5 (Tony Allen speaker biography). The standard's commercial certification is now advertised on ACCS's own site. BSI's 3 February2026 announcement describes UK editorial and committee input and a technology-neutral framework that does not always require full identity verification.",
            "matched": [
              "Tony Allen",
              "Allen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2f336226e025904376e30230fc00b36ca86ccb269e5381138d45a15e0f804362"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "1. The legal control arrow matters",
            "text": "Companies House's current scheme-company PSC page lists AVID as the active corporate controller, notified 1 June 2023, with director appointment/removal rights. AVID's PSC page lists Tony Iain Allen, notified 12 May 2023, with more than 50% but less than 75% of shares and voting rights and director appointment/removal rights; Nicholas John Bate, notified 14 July 2023, holds more than 25% but no more than 50% of shares and votes. These are disclosed control bands, not exact stakes. The register also contains an earlier ceased Nick Bate entry. We have not inspected the change filings; do not count that entry as another independent owner or turn it into an unexplained beneficial-owner departure.",
            "matched": [
              "Allen",
              "Tony Iain Allen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "23e6880bcd2ddd632c47c8f95489896dd722c69683d7ceccc87f579e4340a738"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-bate",
      "label": "Nicholas John Bate",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Current AVID PSC with disclosed more-than25%-to50% share/voting band. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry is not treated as another person or unexplained exit.",
      "aliases": [
        "Nicholas Bate"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-bate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-bate",
        "name": "Nicholas John Bate",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Current AVID PSC with disclosed more-than25%-to50% share/voting band. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry is not treated as another person or unexplained exit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current AVID PSC with disclosed more-than25%-to50% share/voting band. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry is not treated as another person or unexplained exit."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Nicholas Bate"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nicholas John Bate is a person with significant control disclosed in AVID Certification Services Limited's public register. His notification is dated 14 July 2023, and the inspected register places him above 25% and at most 50% of the company's shares and voting rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed substantial holder in the commercial certification provider",
        "significance": "Bate's interest identifies another participant in the ownership and voting structure of a firm operating in the age-assurance market. The range gives meaningful control information without permitting an exact stake to be calculated or a particular assessment decision to be attributed to him.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Register interpretation",
            "text": "The September 2026 inspection also found an earlier ceased entry under Nick Bate. Without the change filings, that entry should not be counted as another independent person or described as a proven ownership exit. The disclosed band is the supported interest; case-specific certification involvement is not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-bate-avid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "More than25% but no more than50%. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry not treated as an independent person or a concluded transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-bate-avid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds disclosed minority share and voting band in",
            "sourceName": "Nicholas John Bate",
            "targetName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "date": "Notified14 July 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "1. The legal control arrow matters",
            "text": "Companies House's current scheme-company PSC page lists AVID as the active corporate controller, notified 1 June 2023, with director appointment/removal rights. AVID's PSC page lists Tony Iain Allen, notified 12 May 2023, with more than 50% but less than 75% of shares and voting rights and director appointment/removal rights; Nicholas John Bate, notified 14 July 2023, holds more than 25% but no more than 50% of shares and votes. These are disclosed control bands, not exact stakes. The register also contains an earlier ceased Nick Bate entry. We have not inspected the change filings; do not count that entry as another independent owner or turn it into an unexplained beneficial-owner departure.",
            "matched": [
              "Nicholas John Bate"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "23e6880bcd2ddd632c47c8f95489896dd722c69683d7ceccc87f579e4340a738"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-iso27566",
      "label": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "International age-assurance framework, released after the July 2025 UK implementation deadline. Normative full text not acquired. Role/commercial-offering links do not imply mandatory regulator endorsement.",
      "aliases": [
        "ISO 27566-1 · Dec 2025"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Standard"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-iso27566",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-iso27566",
        "name": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
        "role": "Standard",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "International age-assurance framework, released after the July 2025 UK implementation deadline. Normative full text not acquired. Role/commercial-offering links do not imply mandatory regulator endorsement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "International age-assurance framework, released after the July 2025 UK implementation deadline. Normative full text not acquired. Role/commercial-offering links do not imply mandatory regulator endorsement."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ISO 27566-1 · Dec 2025"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "International age-assurance framework, released after the July 2025 UK implementation deadline. Normative full text not acquired. Role/commercial-offering links do not imply mandatory regulator endorsement.",
        "structuralRole": "Standard",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "BSI describes national-panel input into JTC1/SC27WG5 and collaboration across regulators, industry and civil society. No claim every proposed provision was adopted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-panel-iso"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
                "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coordinated UK input into development of",
            "sourceName": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
            "targetName": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "date": "BSI3 February 2026 release announcement."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "BSI identifies a commercial certification executive as standard lead editor. Role is not sole authorship, unilateral approval or statutory supplier selection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-iso"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
                "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed by BSI as lead editor of",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "date": "BSI event23 October 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Commercial service offering identified with legal AVID provider footer. Certification fees are principal income; no actual customer payment or regulator exclusivity established. Ofcom's actual certification position belongs to policy lane.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avid-iso-service"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers paid certification services incorporating",
            "sourceName": "AVID Certification Services Limited",
            "targetName": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "date": "Current service page captured9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-bsi-panel",
      "label": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "National standards panel with Tony Allen listed as chair in BSI's October 2025 event biography; coordinated UK input described in February 2026 announcement.",
      "aliases": [
        "BSI standards panel"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Standards body panel"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-bsi-panel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-bsi-panel",
        "name": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
        "role": "Standards body panel",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "National standards panel with Tony Allen listed as chair in BSI's October 2025 event biography; coordinated UK input described in February 2026 announcement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "National standards panel with Tony Allen listed as chair in BSI's October 2025 event biography; coordinated UK input described in February 2026 announcement."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "BSI standards panel"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "BSI IST/33/5/5 is the UK age-assurance standards panel associated with national input into ISO/IEC 27566-1. BSI's October 2025 biography lists Tony Allen as chair, and its February 2026 announcement describes collaboration across regulators, industry and civil society.",
        "structuralRole": "National standards channel connecting UK expertise to an international framework",
        "significance": "The panel is a route by which technical and institutional preferences enter a standard that providers may later use for assurance or certification. Its importance is the coordination function: a national contribution and named chair do not establish that one participant wrote every requirement or controlled the international outcome.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Development role",
            "text": "BSI says the panel coordinated UK input into JTC 1/SC 27/WG 5. Its account presents the resulting framework as technology-neutral and not always requiring full identity verification. The retained sources identify the panel's role and chair, but do not contain meeting votes or show which proposed provisions were accepted.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
                "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
              },
              {
                "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
                "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-panel",
              "w7-market-e-panel-iso"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "BSI describes national-panel input into JTC1/SC27WG5 and collaboration across regulators, industry and civil society. No claim every proposed provision was adopted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-panel-iso"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
                "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coordinated UK input into development of",
            "sourceName": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
            "targetName": "ISO/IEC27566-1:2025 age-assurance framework",
            "date": "BSI3 February 2026 release announcement."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "BSI biography identifies national age-assurance panel chair; meeting decisions and particular votes not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-panel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
                "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed by BSI as chair of",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "BSI IST/33/5/5 age-assurance panel",
            "date": "BSI event23 October 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "2024 consultation and January 2025 reported build under euCONSENT ASBL. Commercial/admission provisions remain proposed unless separately implemented; current AVPA describes development through2025.",
      "aliases": [
        "AgeAware · proposed rules"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-ageaware",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "name": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2024 consultation and January 2025 reported build under euCONSENT ASBL. Commercial/admission provisions remain proposed unless separately implemented; current AVPA describes development through2025.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 consultation and January 2025 reported build under euCONSENT ASBL. Commercial/admission provisions remain proposed unless separately implemented; current AVPA describes development through2025."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "AgeAware · proposed rules"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AgeAware was an interoperability proposal and proof-of-concept project developed in the euCONSENT ASBL context. Its August 2024 consultation specification described how participants, technical components and commercial arrangements would fit together; a January 2025 update credited providers helping design the proof of concept.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed shared age-assurance infrastructure with admission and commercial governance",
        "significance": "Interoperability involves more than passing an age result between services. Someone must decide who can participate, how use is counted and paid for, and when a participant can be suspended. AgeAware's specification exposes those proposed institutional choices alongside the technical demonstration.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Design and development state",
            "text": "The consultation located admission criteria, fit-and-proper review, licensing, tally access and suspension within an ASBL-governed ecosystem. It proposed negotiated core-component exclusivity and three-year commercial-scheme exclusivity followed by contestability. January's account credited VerifyMy, Yoti and AgeChecked with detailed design. AVPA's later retrospective describes development through 2025 and private alternatives. Those records support a proposal and development history, rather than an operating compulsory network or executed exclusivity concession.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
              },
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-euconsent-ageaware",
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-ageaware",
              "w7-market-e-yoti-ageaware",
              "w7-market-e-agechecked-ageaware",
              "w7-market-e-avpa-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Version1.0 consultation locates admission criteria, fit-and-proper review, licensing, tally access and participant suspension in ASBL-governed ecosystem. Includes negotiated core-component exclusivity and proposed three-year commercial-scheme exclusivity, then contestability. This is a published proposal, not an executed concession or current compulsory gate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-euconsent-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "euCONSENT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a proposed admission, billing and governance design for",
            "sourceName": "euCONSENT",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Consultation5 August 2024; final approval/implementation not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document-control table identifies T Allen, ACCS Programme Director, with Approver in the Action column; completion Date is blank and no signed approval is shown. This is proposed approval authority, not a completed decision. It raises a bounded conflict-management question beside later2026 certification design restrictions; not a demonstrated breach.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-allen-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
                "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named as the required ACCS approver for the draft specification of",
            "sourceName": "Tony Iain Allen / Tony Allen",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Draft5 August 2024; rules2026 must not be applied retrospectively without support."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Cover names Iain Corby, Alastair Graham and Ben Gower; Corby document author. No sole authorship or completed approval inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-corby-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Iain Corby",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is a credited author of the proposed specification for",
            "sourceName": "Iain Corby",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Version1.0,5 August 2024."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current AVPA retrospective says ASBL technology development continued until2025 and points to private-sector alternative ecosystems. Does not establish company dissolution or exact service termination, but limits depicting the2024 design as a current mandatory network.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-avpa-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes the project's demonstration mission as fulfilled alongside private alternatives",
            "sourceName": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Undated current page captured9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-agechecked-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeChecked (credited provider brand)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
            "sourceName": "AgeChecked (credited provider brand)",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The proposed review's stated subject was AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact. The participant called it independent; no independence or completion audit was performed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was commissioned to examine rights implications of",
            "sourceName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-safeonline",
      "label": "Safe Online funding programme",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named sponsor of euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware: reported project-level purpose is established. Executed award value, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and governing award terms remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [
        "Safe Online"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-safeonline",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-safeonline",
        "name": "Safe Online funding programme",
        "role": "Funding programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named sponsor of euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware: reported project-level purpose is established. Executed award value, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and governing award terms remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named sponsor of euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware: reported project-level purpose is established. Executed award value, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and governing award terms remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Safe Online"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named sponsor of euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware: reported project-level purpose is established. Executed award value, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and governing award terms remain not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Cover/section1.9 and recipient project update acknowledge Safe Online funding for euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware, establishing reported project-level purpose. Executed amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain not obtained. Original2021 EC consortium grant is separate and not assigned to later ASBL.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-safe-phase2"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "euCONSENT",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is acknowledged as funding Phase II delivered by the later ASBL",
            "sourceName": "Safe Online funding programme",
            "targetName": "euCONSENT",
            "date": "Acknowledged5 August 2024 and9 January 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format",
            "text": "The proposal is sponsored by Safe Online and delivered by the Belgian nonprofit euCONSENT ASBL (cover and1.9, PDF3). It builds on an earlier European Commission-funded consortium project; do not backdate ASBL as the original 2021 grant recipient. The reported project-level funding purpose is established. The executed grant agreement, amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain unacquired; a separately encountered $2million figure belongs to a ten-project portfolio and is not assigned here.",
            "matched": [
              "Safe Online"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "26aa02dd7a0a34606a6b0e5ecc14fab9bc15cde1b23904f60be02312032c3027"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-verifymy",
      "label": "VerifyMy Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company12050874 identified in official product-page footer. Offers email-based age estimation; credited participant in AgeAware design. No customer-specific deployment inferred.",
      "aliases": [
        "VerifyMy"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-verifymy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-verifymy",
        "name": "VerifyMy Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company12050874 identified in official product-page footer. Offers email-based age estimation; credited participant in AgeAware design. No customer-specific deployment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company12050874 identified in official product-page footer. Offers email-based age estimation; credited participant in AgeAware design. No customer-specific deployment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "VerifyMy"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "VerifyMy Limited, company 12050874, supplies age-assurance services including email-based estimation. Its product page describes email ownership checks and digital-footprint analysis in background account-creation or checkout flows and explicit age gates. It also appears as an AgeAware design participant and contributor to Ofcom's evidence base.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial provider whose evidence contributed to acceptance of an assurance method",
        "significance": "VerifyMy connects a marketed product, certification claims and a documented regulatory consultation result. The important distinction is between acceptance of the method and approval of the seller: Ofcom named the evidence in adding email estimation, but did not designate VerifyMy as the required supplier.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Product, design and regulatory contribution",
            "text": "The company reports ACCS certification under requirements incorporating ISO/IEC 27566-1; the actual certificate and algorithm were not independently inspected. euCONSENT's January 2025 account credits it with detailed AgeAware design work. Ofcom's January decision expressly credits AVPA and VerifyMy evidence for the method addition, conditional on effective implementation. The sources give no customer-specific deployment link to Reddit, price or exclusive award.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              },
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-cert",
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-ageaware",
              "w7-policy-e-verifymy-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom paragraphs 3.85–3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence when adding email-based estimation. This connects the named provider to a method-level decision; it does not endorse a vendor, establish performance in a particular deployment, or identify Reddit’s unnamed email supplier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-policy-e-verifymy-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
            "sourceName": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "targetName": "Email-based age estimation as a HEAA-capable method",
            "date": "16 January 2025 statement; current provider identity separately read 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
            "sourceName": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Provider says ACCS1:2025 technical requirements incorporate ISO27566-1, classifying its email and face methods highly effective. Actual certificate, independent method evaluation and fee are not obtained; not Ofcom product endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-verifymy-cert"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
                "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports its platform has certification incorporating ISO27566-1 from",
            "sourceName": "VerifyMy Limited",
            "targetName": "Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd",
            "date": "Current product page captured9 September 2026; not backdated to January 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "3. A standards editor is also a certification-business principal",
            "text": "VerifyMy's current product page names its legal operator as VerifyMy Limited, 12050874. It sells email-age estimation using an email, ownership checks and digital-footprint analysis, with background account-creation/checkout and explicit age-gate variants. It reports ACCS certification of its platform under ACCS1:2025 incorporating ISO27566-1. This is a provider's certification claim, not independent inspection of its certificate or algorithm. It supplies no price, profit, customer list or assignment to Reddit.",
            "matched": [
              "VerifyMy Limited",
              "VerifyMy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4ccdb9f76e32fdcea205455202515f399eab8ac525e11209a102be6742bb4659"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "3. A standards editor is also a certification-business principal",
            "text": "Policy lane separately owns the Ofcom January2025 disposition crediting AVPA/VerifyMy evidence for adding email estimation. That is actual method-level uptake; it is not evidence VerifyMy supplies every platform using the method. Ofcom's refusal to make independent certification compulsory or automatically sufficient must accompany any combined narrative.",
            "matched": [
              "VerifyMy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ba174a7853037b249ed9ce6e16a394b793fa6ec639477e6fdb076910f9059ac0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices",
            "heading": "What consultation actually changed",
            "text": "Paragraphs 3.85–3.87, PDF 27: AVPA/VerifyMy evidence supported adding email-based estimation, conditional on effective implementation. Paragraphs 3.103–3.105, PDF 30–31: token references were added, retaining responsibility for the underlying check and sharing process. The preceding response summary, paragraphs 3.66–3.68 and footnote 94 on PDF 24, attributes the token recommendation to 5Rights, Yoti and the ACT App Association. Paragraph 3.108, PDF 31, and 3.350–3.353, PDF 76–77: certification can evidence compliance but is neither compulsory nor automatic; Ofcom did not adopt Yoti's request to mandate independent testing/certification. Paragraphs 3.243–3.259, PDF 54–57: requested numerical thresholds were declined at that stage, citing inadequate comparable evidence/testing and market-development concerns. Paragraphs 3.277–3.290, PDF 62–65: 5Rights' separate privacy-criterion proposal was declined because existing data-protection law applied; design/minimisation guidance was strengthened. None of these outcomes proves a private bargain or sole authorship.",
            "matched": [
              "VerifyMy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a48c32bc328e15a927c3ac607141b352bb0a41f2c8e3606535f5aa84cc481240"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-yoti",
      "label": "Yoti (credited provider brand)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. This lane has not allocated that contribution to a specific legal subsidiary.",
      "aliases": [
        "Yoti"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Provider brand"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-yoti",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-yoti",
        "name": "Yoti (credited provider brand)",
        "role": "Provider brand",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. This lane has not allocated that contribution to a specific legal subsidiary.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. This lane has not allocated that contribution to a specific legal subsidiary."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Yoti"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. This lane has not allocated that contribution to a specific legal subsidiary.",
        "structuralRole": "Provider brand",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-yoti-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
            "sourceName": "Yoti (credited provider brand)",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-agechecked",
      "label": "AgeChecked (credited provider brand)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. Legal operator/shareholding and compensation not here.",
      "aliases": [
        "AgeChecked"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Provider brand"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-market-agechecked",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-agechecked",
        "name": "AgeChecked (credited provider brand)",
        "role": "Provider brand",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. Legal operator/shareholding and compensation not here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. Legal operator/shareholding and compensation not here."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "AgeChecked"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named as AgeAware detailed-design participant in January 2025 project account. Legal operator/shareholding and compensation not here.",
        "structuralRole": "Provider brand",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-market-e-agechecked-ageaware"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
                "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
            "sourceName": "AgeChecked (credited provider brand)",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
            "heading": "Integration instructions",
            "text": "Keep accs as a historical umbrella and add exact legal nodes; do not duplicate the existing A$3,830,277 Australia award as new money or retarget older ambiguous ACCS assertions without the original named entity. Preserve the original consortium/ASBL chronology in euconsent. Yoti and AgeChecked here are credited provider brands, not newly researched legal subsidiaries. Reported self-certification, proposed approval, actual published rules and registered control must remain distinct. Current national digital-ID policy is outside this lane and is not a prerequisite for any relationship claimed here.",
            "matched": [
              "AgeChecked"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "06bf1b827be2f3f84f9a0cd2ded5dc698844e1d6f8ed0983659dc7d7f4e30dde"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-parkinson",
      "label": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Minister who presented the July 2023 government age-assurance amendments and credited specific parliamentary collaborators.",
      "aliases": [
        "Lord Parkinson"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-parkinson",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-parkinson",
        "name": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Minister who presented the July 2023 government age-assurance amendments and credited specific parliamentary collaborators.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Minister who presented the July 2023 government age-assurance amendments and credited specific parliamentary collaborators."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Lord Parkinson"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay was the UK minister presenting government age-assurance amendments during the Online Safety Bill's July 2023 Lords proceedings. Hansard records both his explicit credit to parliamentary collaborators and his reasons for declining a proposed privacy addition.",
        "structuralRole": "Government negotiator translating parliamentary advocacy into accepted and declined amendments",
        "significance": "His statements reveal a decision-making junction: collaborators can be credited for shaping principles while a particular amendment is still declined. That makes the debates useful evidence of selective legislative negotiation, rather than a claim that cooperation guaranteed every requested provision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Collaboration and refusal",
            "text": "On 6 July Parkinson credited Kidron's work concerning Amendment 124 and thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for collaboration over preceding months. On 10 July he declined Amendments 125 and 217, citing existing privacy and data-protection safeguards and possible legal confusion. Amendment 125 was not moved, so the outcome was not a House vote rejecting that amendment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
              },
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
              },
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-credit",
              "w7-adv-e-declined-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minister declined Amendments 125/217, citing existing privacy/data-protection safeguards and concern about legal confusion. Amendment 125 was not moved, so no House vote rejecting it is claimed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-declined-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined proposed privacy addition",
            "sourceName": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
            "targetName": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
            "date": "10 July 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parkinson specifically credited Kidron's work relating to Amendment 124 and thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for continued collaboration over preceding months.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-credit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited work on age-assurance principles",
            "sourceName": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
            "targetName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "date": "6 July 2023."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-amend124",
      "label": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Government age-assurance principles amendment, co-sponsored by Kidron and agreed 10 July 2023. One contribution route into Ofcom's statutory framework.",
      "aliases": [
        "Amendment 124 · agreed"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislative amendment"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-amend124",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-amend124",
        "name": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
        "role": "Legislative amendment",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Government age-assurance principles amendment, co-sponsored by Kidron and agreed 10 July 2023. One contribution route into Ofcom's statutory framework.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Government age-assurance principles amendment, co-sponsored by Kidron and agreed 10 July 2023. One contribution route into Ofcom's statutory framework."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Amendment 124 · agreed"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Government age-assurance principles amendment, co-sponsored by Kidron and agreed 10 July 2023. One contribution route into Ofcom's statutory framework.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative amendment",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The Lords agreed Amendment 124 on 10 July 2023. It set age-assurance principles for Ofcom, including proportionate effectiveness, age ranges, AADC standards and interoperability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-agreed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Parliament",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed amendment",
            "sourceName": "UK Parliament",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
            "date": "10 July 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Amendment 124; Parkinson was lead member and Clement-Jones also sponsored it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-cosponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-sponsored",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Bill Amendment 124 · July 2023",
            "date": "July 2023 Report-stage amendment."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-amend125",
      "label": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Proposed addition to Amendment 124 concerning privacy, purpose limits and deletion/storage; minister declined it and it was not moved 10 July 2023.",
      "aliases": [
        "Amendment 125 · not moved"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislative amendment"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-amend125",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-amend125",
        "name": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
        "role": "Legislative amendment",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Proposed addition to Amendment 124 concerning privacy, purpose limits and deletion/storage; minister declined it and it was not moved 10 July 2023.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposed addition to Amendment 124 concerning privacy, purpose limits and deletion/storage; minister declined it and it was not moved 10 July 2023."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Amendment 125 · not moved"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Proposed addition to Amendment 124 concerning privacy, purpose limits and deletion/storage; minister declined it and it was not moved 10 July 2023.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative amendment",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minister declined Amendments 125/217, citing existing privacy/data-protection safeguards and concern about legal confusion. Amendment 125 was not moved, so no House vote rejecting it is claimed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-declined-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined proposed privacy addition",
            "sourceName": "Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay",
            "targetName": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
            "date": "10 July 2023."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Kidron proposed purpose restrictions and deletion/secure-storage wording through Amendment 125 to Amendment 124.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-privacy-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
                "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Beeban Kidron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "tabled privacy addition",
            "sourceName": "Beeban Kidron",
            "targetName": "Kidron privacy Amendment 125 · July 2023",
            "date": "July 2023; spoken to 10 July 2023."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
      "label": "5Rights privacy criterion proposal · March 2024",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Part5 consultation request for privacy-preserving age assurance as an express criterion; Ofcom declined that criterion architecture in January 2025.",
      "aliases": [
        "Privacy criterion · proposed"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
        "name": "5Rights privacy criterion proposal · March 2024",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Part5 consultation request for privacy-preserving age assurance as an express criterion; Ofcom declined that criterion architecture in January 2025.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Part5 consultation request for privacy-preserving age assurance as an express criterion; Ofcom declined that criterion architecture in January 2025."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Privacy criterion · proposed"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Part5 consultation request for privacy-preserving age assurance as an express criterion; Ofcom declined that criterion architecture in January 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "5Rights asked for privacy-preserving assurance as a criterion, with minimal data collection, limited retention and security; its proposed on-device/result-only approach sought to avoid a central identity database linked to online activity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-proposed-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested express privacy criterion",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights privacy criterion proposal · March 2024",
            "date": "Document labelled March 2024; exact submission day not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom named 5Rights' request then declined adding a separate privacy criterion because data-protection requirements already apply. It also clarified design/minimisation guidance and said both regimes are mandatory.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-declined-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined separate criterion",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "5Rights privacy criterion proposal · March 2024",
            "date": "January 2025 statement."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-token-proposal",
      "label": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Part of a broader proposed ecosystem for age-appropriate services; Ofcom later added conditional token guidance after responses from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT.",
      "aliases": [
        "Age tokens · proposal"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-token-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-token-proposal",
        "name": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Part of a broader proposed ecosystem for age-appropriate services; Ofcom later added conditional token guidance after responses from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Part of a broader proposed ecosystem for age-appropriate services; Ofcom later added conditional token guidance after responses from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Age tokens · proposal"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Part of a broader proposed ecosystem for age-appropriate services; Ofcom later added conditional token guidance after responses from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom recorded token submissions from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT and added references in guidance.A token is not itself an assurance method: underlying age check and sharing must satisfy HEAA, and the regulated service retains responsibility.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-tokens-disposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "added conditional references after token submissions",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
            "date": "January 2025 statement."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "5Rights argued for age ranges and a broader ecosystem, including privacy-preserving age tokens, for age-appropriate experiences. Its criticism of the draft as binary is the respondent's characterization.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-proposed-token"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended age tokens in broader assurance ecosystem",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights age-token proposal · July 2024",
            "date": "Document 17 July 2024."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-certification-proposal",
      "label": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Additional-measures response promotes risk-based IEEE 2089.1 confidence levels and asks Ofcom to consider certification, citing ACCS requirements. Adoption or payment not established.",
      "aliases": [
        "Certification · proposal"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-certification-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-certification-proposal",
        "name": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Additional-measures response promotes risk-based IEEE 2089.1 confidence levels and asks Ofcom to consider certification, citing ACCS requirements. Adoption or payment not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Additional-measures response promotes risk-based IEEE 2089.1 confidence levels and asks Ofcom to consider certification, citing ACCS requirements. Adoption or payment not established."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Certification · proposal"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Additional-measures response promotes risk-based IEEE 2089.1 confidence levels and asks Ofcom to consider certification, citing ACCS requirements. Adoption or payment not established.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The 5Rights response cited ACCS's 2021 Technical Requirements for Age Check Systems while recommending Ofcom consider certification. It also cited certification against a 5Rights-led standard.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-accs-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cited technical requirements as certification example",
            "sourceName": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
            "targetName": "ACCS · historical brand / scheme umbrella",
            "date": "Document labelled October 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "5Rights recommended numerical thresholds tied to risk/age ranges and urged Ofcom to consider certification to help services choose age-assurance partners, citing IEEE 2089.1–2024 and ACCS.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-certification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "urged standards and certification consideration",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights standards/certification proposal · October 2025",
            "date": "Document labelled October 2025; exact submission day not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "label": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "euCONSENT reported commissioning a child/human-rights review through team academics, with Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads. The review, contract, fees and completion were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [
        "AgeAware rights review"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Commissioned review"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
        "name": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
        "role": "Commissioned review",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "euCONSENT reported commissioning a child/human-rights review through team academics, with Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads. The review, contract, fees and completion were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "euCONSENT reported commissioning a child/human-rights review through team academics, with Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads. The review, contract, fees and completion were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "AgeAware rights review"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the review of AgeAware's child-rights and wider human-rights implications that euCONSENT reported commissioning in January 2025. Its project update named Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads and described a commissioning route through academics on the team.",
        "structuralRole": "Announced rights assessment within an age-assurance infrastructure project",
        "significance": "Commissioning a rights review places legal and ethical assessment alongside technical development. The named people and subject create an identifiable deliverable to follow, but an announcement of that process does not itself demonstrate that the system passed an independent assessment or that the review was delivered.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What was announced",
            "text": "The 9 January project account named Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair as team academics through whom the review was commissioned. It described Day and Witting as intended leaders and called the work independent. The retained corpus contains the commissioning account, rather than the completed review, fee, contract or clearance terms; completion and the substance of any findings remain unestablished.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-commission",
              "w7-adv-e-review-day",
              "w7-adv-e-review-witting",
              "w7-adv-e-review-livingstone",
              "w7-adv-e-review-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "euCONSENT's project update reported commissioning a review of AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact through team academics. The article identifies the later ASBL project context; the contracting legal instrument, fee, clearance terms and completion are unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "euCONSENT",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported commissioning",
            "sourceName": "euCONSENT",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The project account said the review was commissioned through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair. This identifies an attributed commissioning route, not three personally executed contracts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-livingstone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sonia Livingstone",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named among team academics through whom review was commissioned",
            "sourceName": "Sonia Livingstone",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The proposed review's stated subject was AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact. The participant called it independent; no independence or completion audit was performed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was commissioned to examine rights implications of",
            "sourceName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "targetName": "AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The project update named Emma Day, alongside Sabine Witting, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-day"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Emma Day",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
            "sourceName": "Emma Day",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The project update named Sabine Witting, alongside Emma Day, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w7-adv-e-review-witting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
                "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sabine Witting",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
            "sourceName": "Sabine Witting",
            "targetName": "Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025",
            "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
            "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Launched 22 September 2025. General demand for internationally enforceable AI boundaries; endorsement does not establish agreement with every partner implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-call",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-call",
        "name": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Launched 22 September 2025. General demand for internationally enforceable AI boundaries; endorsement does not establish agreement with every partner implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Launched 22 September 2025. General demand for internationally enforceable AI boundaries; endorsement does not establish agreement with every partner implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 22
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Global Call for AI Red Lines is a campaign launched on 22 September 2025 seeking internationally enforceable limits on dangerous AI conduct. CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI are named co-organisers; its published credits identify the people handling drafting, signatories, press work and political outreach.",
        "structuralRole": "A coalition turning AI-risk concerns into a shared international demand",
        "significance": "The campaign provides a common statement around which researchers, politicians and advocacy organisations can assemble. Its unusually specific credits expose the division of labour behind the public appeal, and its follow-through shows how publicity is meant to lead into diplomacy.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From drafting to diplomatic follow-through",
            "text": "Charbel-Raphael Segerie is credited with initial drafting; Niki Iliadis and Tereza Zoumpalova with TFS management and outreach; Arthur Grimonpont and Apollo Strategic Communications with press work; and Anoush Rima Tatevossian with UN-engagement advice. ControlAI, FLI, Andrea Miotti and Adam Shimi supplied feedback. Maria Ressa carried the campaign into a prepared UN-hosted speech. CeSIA’s later funding proposal sought champion states and agreements. Signing this general statement does not establish endorsement of every partner’s separate shutdown, treaty or prohibition design.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call launch press release",
                "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              },
              {
                "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              },
              {
                "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
                "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
              },
              {
                "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-organizer-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-organizer-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-organizer-chai",
              "w8-red-e-work-segerie",
              "w8-red-e-work-niki",
              "w8-red-e-work-tereza",
              "w8-red-e-work-anoush",
              "w8-red-e-work-grimonpont",
              "w8-red-e-work-shimi",
              "w8-red-e-work-miotti",
              "w8-red-e-work-controlai",
              "w8-red-e-work-fli",
              "w8-red-e-work-apollo",
              "w8-red-e-signature-hubinger",
              "w8-red-e-signature-kidron",
              "w8-red-e-signature-miotti",
              "w8-red-e-ctrl-partner",
              "w8-red-e-survey-reference",
              "w8-red-e-sprint-call",
              "w8-red-e-ressa-call",
              "w8-red-e-clement-call",
              "w8-red-e-athens-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Targets champion states, aligned lab thresholds and a UN resolution. Anticipates competitive benefit for Anthropic/DeepMind; their agreement is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sprint-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes converting campaign support into agreements",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "2026 plan, not completion"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The acknowledgements credit survey work; draft timing and survey do not establish that survey results caused the initial draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-survey-reference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "survey cited in campaign development credits",
            "sourceName": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "February chronology has unresolved day-level ordering"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-signature-hubinger"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Evan Hubinger",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed individual signatory",
            "sourceName": "Evan Hubinger",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parliamentary advocacy. Government commissioning or acceptance of campaign treaty unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-clement-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lord Tim Clement-Jones",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate",
            "sourceName": "Lord Tim Clement-Jones",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "29January2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organizer account of program continuity, not proof every attendee endorsed campaign.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "developed agenda building on campaign",
            "sourceName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Submitted statement page3; not a UN resolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
                "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Maria Ressa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocated named campaign in UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "sourceName": "Maria Ressa",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "22September2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "self-identifies as official partner",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ctrl-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "self-identifies as official partner",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "25 September2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "named campaign co-organizer",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-organizer-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call launch press release",
                "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "22 September 2025 launch"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority",
            "text": "The Global Call for AI Red Lines supplies a documented campaign-production chain: drafting, management, partner feedback and signatory work have named roles. CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI are organisers; ControlAI and FLI provided partner feedback. The Call is distinct from ControlAI's A Narrow Path . Evan Hubinger's signature does not assign him every proposal advanced by another participant. Advocacy and summit access also remain separate from government adoption. This branch supplies real coordination, with a bounded object and purpose. A4",
            "matched": [
              "Global Call for AI Red Lines"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "42bc2037ad032c073e1140c5fd33c2483a642caf3a30f85c6c41b39fccb3b706"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "The Future Society",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Campaign co-organizer; named operational staff and policy-forum work. Organizational financing is distinct from campaign expenditure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-tfs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-tfs",
        "name": "The Future Society",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Campaign co-organizer; named operational staff and policy-forum work. Organizational financing is distinct from campaign expenditure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Campaign co-organizer; named operational staff and policy-forum work. Organizational financing is distinct from campaign expenditure."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom partnerships",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Future Society is an AI-governance organisation that co-organised the Global Call for AI Red Lines, ran the Athens Roundtable and helped organise international workshops. Named staff handled campaign management, signatory recruitment and policy outreach, making its operational role visible beyond a partner logo.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign organiser and policy convener",
        "significance": "TFS links the work of assembling a public coalition to the settings where policy proposals are developed and discussed. Its staff curate agendas as well as convene participants: the recorded survey process reduced fifteen candidate priorities to ten options before respondents ranked them.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How the organisation is supported and connected",
            "text": "Effektiv Spenden reports forwarding organisational support, with an update describing a combined EUR114,000 allocation. SFF tables list general-support recommendations sourced from Jaan Tallinn of USD97,000 in 2024 and USD336,000 in 2025; earlier 2023 recommendations named FLI and Tallinn separately. These are not a campaign expenditure account. TFS also co-leads an independent red-lines subgroup within UNESCO’s civil-society network and describes a verified-redlines partnership with Fathom. These links give it several routes from advocacy into continuing policy work.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call launch press release",
                "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              },
              {
                "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
              },
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fathom partnerships",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-organizer-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-survey-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-longview-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-eff-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2024",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2025",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-fli",
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-tallinn",
              "w8-red-e-tfs-subgroup",
              "w8-red-e-india-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-athens-tfs",
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer. Financial details: value: 365,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-fli"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2023H2"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer. Financial details: value: 11,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-tallinn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2023H2"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding. Financial details: value: 336,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2025"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding. Financial details: value: 97,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "SFF2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-survey-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
            "sourceName": "The Future Society",
            "targetName": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "date": "February2025 survey; April2report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current organizational collaboration; not proof of September2025 campaign financing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fathom partnerships",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly describes verified-redlines partnership",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "Observed9September2026; start unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Independent CSO work under UNESCO network; does not commit UNESCO or member states.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-tfs-subgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
            "sourceName": "The Future Society",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-longview-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
            "sourceName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "H2/2024 allocation"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest financial connection is a shared intermediary: Effektiv Spenden reports supporting both CeSIA and The Future Society after Longview Philanthropy recommendations. These are organizational funding records. A separate CeSIA solicitation explicitly budgets Red Lines diplomatic follow-through. No inspected record establishes a paid, campaign-restricted grant, the launch's total cost, or donor authority over its wording.",
            "matched": [
              "The Future Society"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4917bf86923d5c70181ca4eff3649d3ab3e10e2b3a7dffb75faadc8f29a679c4"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority",
            "text": "The Global Call for AI Red Lines supplies a documented campaign-production chain: drafting, management, partner feedback and signatory work have named roles. CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI are organisers; ControlAI and FLI provided partner feedback. The Call is distinct from ControlAI's A Narrow Path . Evan Hubinger's signature does not assign him every proposal advanced by another participant. Advocacy and summit access also remain separate from government adoption. This branch supplies real coordination, with a bounded object and purpose. A4",
            "matched": [
              "The Future Society"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "42bc2037ad032c073e1140c5fd33c2483a642caf3a30f85c6c41b39fccb3b706"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom partnerships",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-cesia",
      "label": "CeSIA",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Centre pour la Securite de l'Intelligence Artificielle; co-organizer and author of a 2026 diplomatic funding proposal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-cesia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-cesia",
        "name": "CeSIA",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Centre pour la Securite de l'Intelligence Artificielle; co-organizer and author of a 2026 diplomatic funding proposal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Centre pour la Securite de l'Intelligence Artificielle; co-organizer and author of a 2026 diplomatic funding proposal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 11
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CeSIA, the Centre pour la Sécurité de l’Intelligence Artificielle, is an AI-safety organisation and co-organiser of the Global Call for AI Red Lines. Its 2026 diplomatic funding proposal set out how it hoped to turn campaign support into agreements, aligned thresholds and a UN resolution.",
        "structuralRole": "A bridge from public mobilisation to proposed diplomatic commitments",
        "significance": "CeSIA is especially informative because its solicitation describes intended next steps, prospective state partners and funding needs. That exposes a campaign strategy more directly than overlapping memberships: recruit champions, translate general support into negotiated commitments and seek international recognition.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Money and intended follow-through",
            "text": "Effektiv Spenden reported forwarding EUR195,000 in organisational support. SFF’s 2024 table recommended USD48,000 with EffiSciences as receiving charity. A later CeSIA account reported a USD2 million two-year recommendation from Longview and non-receipt at the time of its statement. Separately, its diplomatic sprint requested USD150,000 for the first half of 2026 against an approximate USD400,000 full-year plan. Requests, recommendations and reported receipts are different stages; none establishes that a government accepted the intended agreements.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call launch press release",
                "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              },
              {
                "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
                "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
                "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-organizer-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-longview-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-eff-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-sff-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-effisciences",
              "w8-red-e-solicitation",
              "w8-red-e-longview-2m",
              "w8-red-e-cesia-subgroup",
              "w8-red-e-india-cesia",
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-france",
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD150000 request for Q1-Q22026; approximate full-year plan USD400000. Platform displays USD0, which excludes off-platform financing. Financial details: value: 150,000; currency: USD; kind: funding request; period: Q1-Q2 2026",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-solicitation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested funding for diplomatic follow-through",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
            "date": "Created Dec4,2025; later update undated"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "SFF2024 lists Jaan Tallinn as source. Not verified disbursement. Financial details: value: 48,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sff-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended general support; EffiSciences receiving charity",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "SFF2024 round"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-longview-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
            "sourceName": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "H1/2024 allocation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Intermediary role named; legal agreement and onward transfer not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-effisciences"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EffiSciences",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed receiving charity for SFF recommendation",
            "sourceName": "EffiSciences",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "SFF2024; no second grant amount"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Host programme plus organizer retrospective; not state endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
                "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
                "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named event co-organizer",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "date": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Project intention, not government acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-france"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "French G7 presidency2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "targeted as champion-state opportunity",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "French G7 presidency2026",
            "date": "2026 diplomatic plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "named campaign co-organizer",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-organizer-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call launch press release",
                "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "22 September 2025 launch"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "listed subgroup member",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-cesia-subgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed subgroup member",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway",
            "heading": "S3 — Dated launch and initial public framing",
            "text": "Candidate edges: CeSIA/TFS/CHAI → co-organized call; Maria Ressa → announced call on 22 September 2025; campaign → scheduled presentation at AI Safety Connect on 25 September. The government-uptake lane owns independent UN records.",
            "matched": [
              "CeSIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32781941812c26b56cf1601f71080f10ba1c8503dcaea963b0093670cedc8001"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "6. Geneva: do not promote speeches or a summary into a negotiated agreement",
            "text": "Priority missing record: actual final Co-Chairs' Summary and annexed submissions, especially any TFS/CeSIA/CHAI contribution, followed by the attribution/version trail. Root should treat this as a defined public-document access gap, not evidence of concealment or adoption.",
            "matched": [
              "CeSIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "099b198e675175f9ae4668225b5e10fedb9ae1969f49aced240dba77b691a291"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "Causal checks and stopping boundary",
            "text": "The strongest next acquisition is the actual briefing/transmission document at one conversion point: UNESCO subgroup to a government delegation, TFS/CeSIA workshop to India's working group, or ControlAI to Hunt. These can distinguish policy influence from ordinary participation without enlarging the membership roster.",
            "matched": [
              "CeSIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b6f86bfb77864a9a2c82133ef663ee5d969016a918d6e16b440cc6c393cadfc2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes",
            "heading": "Candidate relationships for integration",
            "text": "Do not create CeSIA → G7 language “drafted,” “secured,” “caused,” or “adopted” edges from these materials. A possible semantic-overlap observation belongs in an analytical note rather than as an influence fact. Mirlesse's exact programme title is contemporaneous; do not silently substitute an independently assumed senior envoy role.",
            "matched": [
              "CeSIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "272a0b66c1bc77fb363706e43de75ee4a5a9e7f9cea6fe4e6718b36367280d86"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-chai",
      "label": "Center for Human-Compatible AI (CHAI)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "UC Berkeley research centre named as campaign co-organizer.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-chai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-chai",
        "name": "Center for Human-Compatible AI (CHAI)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "UC Berkeley research centre named as campaign co-organizer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "UC Berkeley research centre named as campaign co-organizer."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UC Berkeley research centre named as campaign co-organizer.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "named campaign co-organizer",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-organizer-chai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call launch press release",
                "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
            "sourceName": "Center for Human-Compatible AI (CHAI)",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "22 September 2025 launch"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-segerie",
      "label": "Charbel-Raphael Segerie",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Credited initial drafter; CeSIA executive director in the diplomatic proposal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-segerie",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-segerie",
        "name": "Charbel-Raphael Segerie",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited initial drafter; CeSIA executive director in the diplomatic proposal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited initial drafter; CeSIA executive director in the diplomatic proposal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Charbel-Raphael Segerie is credited with the initial drafting of the Global Call for AI Red Lines. CeSIA’s later diplomatic proposal identifies him as its executive director, linking statement development to an organisation pursuing follow-through with states and international forums.",
        "structuralRole": "Initial statement drafting and organisational leadership",
        "significance": "Segerie occupies an earlier stage in the campaign’s development than signatories or publicity supporters: preparing the text around which others organised. The later CeSIA proposal makes the intended transition from statement to diplomatic activity visible.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The contribution and its limits",
            "text": "The campaign credits identify initial drafting. Subsequent acknowledgements name feedback contributors and operational staff, showing that the public statement passed through a wider process. Initial authorship does not establish sole control over the final wording or agreement by prospective state partners. The useful next documentary layer would be draft revisions and decisions about which commitments the coalition could jointly support.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-segerie"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with initial drafting",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-segerie"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with initial drafting",
            "sourceName": "Charbel-Raphael Segerie",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-iliadis",
      "label": "Niki Iliadis",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Credited TFS project management and policy outreach.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-iliadis",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-iliadis",
        "name": "Niki Iliadis",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited TFS project management and policy outreach.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited TFS project management and policy outreach."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Niki Iliadis is credited with The Future Society’s project management and policy outreach for the Global Call for AI Red Lines. Her role concerns organising the campaign’s work and its engagement with policy audiences.",
        "structuralRole": "Project management behind a public advocacy coalition",
        "significance": "A coalition needs practical coordination as well as names on a statement. Iliadis’s recorded work makes that coordinating function visible, helping distinguish those who assembled and ran the effort from supporters who endorsed the finished call.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The evidence for the role",
            "text": "The organisers’ acknowledgements credit TFS project management to Iliadis. They do not provide an employment contract, budget authority or personal power to approve the statement. The supported role is operational: helping a multi-organisation campaign progress through preparation and outreach. This is a specific responsibility, rather than evidence that every associated organisation answers to one manager.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-niki"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with TFS project management",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-niki"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with TFS project management",
            "sourceName": "Niki Iliadis",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-zoumpalova",
      "label": "Tereza Zoumpalova",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Credited TFS campaign management and signatory work; named UNESCO-network subgroup representative.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-zoumpalova",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-zoumpalova",
        "name": "Tereza Zoumpalova",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited TFS campaign management and signatory work; named UNESCO-network subgroup representative.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited TFS campaign management and signatory work; named UNESCO-network subgroup representative."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tereza Zoumpalova is credited with The Future Society’s management and signatory work for the Global Call for AI Red Lines. She is also named as a representative of the International AI Red Lines subgroup in the coordination structure of UNESCO’s civil-society and academic network.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign operations connected to continuing policy coordination",
        "significance": "Zoumpalova links the recruitment and organisation of a public campaign with its longer-lived institutional working environment. That continuity helps explain how a launch can be followed by sustained coordination rather than remaining a one-day publicity event.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The two recorded roles",
            "text": "Campaign acknowledgements identify management and signatory work. Network documentation identifies subgroup representation. Both are operational roles within participating organisations; neither establishes a UNESCO employment relationship or an independent power to commit governments. The evidence makes her a useful person for understanding campaign workflow, signatory recruitment and the subgroup’s organisational interface.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-tereza",
              "w8-red-e-tereza-representative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organizational participation, not UNESCO officer status or personal veto rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-tereza-representative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named subgroup representative in coordination group",
            "sourceName": "Tereza Zoumpalova",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with TFS management and signatory work",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-tereza"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with TFS management and signatory work",
            "sourceName": "Tereza Zoumpalova",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-tatevossian",
      "label": "Anoush Rima Tatevossian",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Credited UN-engagement advice and policy/civil-society outreach.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-tatevossian",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-tatevossian",
        "name": "Anoush Rima Tatevossian",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited UN-engagement advice and policy/civil-society outreach.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited UN-engagement advice and policy/civil-society outreach."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anoush Rima Tatevossian is credited with advice on UN engagement and policy and civil-society outreach for the Global Call for AI Red Lines. Her recorded contribution concerns bringing the campaign into relevant institutional and advocacy settings.",
        "structuralRole": "Advice on international engagement and outreach",
        "significance": "This role helps explain how a coalition statement is prepared for audiences beyond its founding organisations. Knowing the people who advise on institutional engagement is useful for tracing access and communication, even when they neither fund the campaign nor write its core demand.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the acknowledgement records",
            "text": "The published credits attribute UN-engagement advice to Tatevossian. They do not establish a UN appointment, governmental mandate, paid lobbying contract or authority over the campaign’s final statement. The evidence identifies a specific professional contribution to outreach, with the detailed communications and arrangements remaining outside the recovered record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-anoush"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with UN-engagement advice",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-anoush"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with UN-engagement advice",
            "sourceName": "Anoush Rima Tatevossian",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-grimonpont",
      "label": "Arthur Grimonpont",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Credited approach to Maria Ressa and press-conference coordination.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-grimonpont",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-grimonpont",
        "name": "Arthur Grimonpont",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited approach to Maria Ressa and press-conference coordination.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited approach to Maria Ressa and press-conference coordination."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Arthur Grimonpont is credited with coordinating the Global Call for AI Red Lines press conference and pitching the campaign to Maria Ressa. Her prepared UN-hosted statement subsequently advocated the named campaign.",
        "structuralRole": "Press coordination and recruitment of a public advocate",
        "significance": "Grimonpont’s role makes part of the communications machinery concrete: identifying a messenger, approaching her and organising the launch setting. These are practical persuasion activities recorded in campaign credits, rather than inferred from social proximity.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What his credits establish",
            "text": "The organisers attribute both press-conference coordination and the approach to Ressa to Grimonpont. The speech supplies a separate public artifact showing the campaign in her submitted remarks. The material does not identify payment, authority to approve her speech or control over her wider views. It does identify who performed a consequential outreach task.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-grimonpont",
              "w8-red-e-ressa-approach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with press-conference coordination",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-grimonpont"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with press-conference coordination",
            "sourceName": "Arthur Grimonpont",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with pitching the campaign",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-approach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Maria Ressa",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with pitching the campaign",
            "sourceName": "Arthur Grimonpont",
            "targetName": "Maria Ressa",
            "date": "Before September2025 announcement; exact date unreported"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-shimi",
      "label": "Adam Shimi",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Credited drafting feedback on the campaign statement; no final approval right established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-shimi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-shimi",
        "name": "Adam Shimi",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited drafting feedback on the campaign statement; no final approval right established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited drafting feedback on the campaign statement; no final approval right established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Adam Shimi is credited with providing drafting feedback on the Global Call for AI Red Lines. His recorded connection is to the preparation of the campaign statement, rather than its financing, formal sponsorship or international adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Input into the wording of a coalition statement",
        "significance": "Feedback is a real contribution to policy advocacy, but it differs from originating a draft or having final approval. Identifying that distinction helps readers understand the division of labour behind the campaign without inflating every contributor into a principal.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The supported contribution",
            "text": "The campaign’s acknowledgements name Shimi among those who supplied drafting feedback. No marked-up draft, accepted revision or final approval right is included in the retained evidence. His entry therefore identifies a participant in statement development; it does not allocate a particular demand or enforcement proposal to him personally.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-shimi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with drafting feedback",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-shimi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with drafting feedback",
            "sourceName": "Adam Shimi",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Policy collaboration, separately from authority",
            "text": "Apart Research's June 2025 sprint is stronger evidence of institutional cooperation than a shared conference panel: it presented a ControlAI policy stress test, with ControlAI personnel including Adam Shimi, Max Winga and Tolga Bilge helping organize or judge, and Miotti giving the keynote. It links the policy-development and communications personnel operationally; it is not proof of a funding transfer between the organizations. [M03]",
            "matched": [
              "Adam Shimi",
              "Shimi"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "24e1c299fc5e7527b48683173a5f64e7e439704a3629fb8013d0aa36a2cee558"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-hubinger",
      "label": "Evan Hubinger",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "An AI researcher listed among the signatories of the Global Call for AI Red Lines.",
      "aliases": [
        "EvanHub",
        "Evan"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "AI researcher & signatory"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-hubinger",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-hubinger",
        "name": "Evan Hubinger",
        "role": "AI researcher & signatory",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An AI researcher listed among the signatories of the Global Call for AI Red Lines.",
        "why": "His participation connects technical research with a public campaign. The nature of that participation is a signature, rather than an established management or financing role.",
        "about": [
          "The campaign acknowledgements separately name its organisers and partners. They do not assign Hubinger responsibility for ControlAI’s wider programme or for the institutions proposed in A Narrow Path."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "EvanHub",
          "Evan"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An AI researcher listed among the signatories of the Global Call for AI Red Lines.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical AI-risk work connected to a public campaign",
        "significance": "Hubinger’s significance here is the documented connection between a technical AI-risk researcher and a public red-lines initiative. The precise role in that initiative matters more than inferring a general alliance from employment or intellectual proximity.",
        "background": [
          "The campaign acknowledgements separately name its organisers and partners. They do not assign Hubinger responsibility for ControlAI’s wider programme or for the institutions proposed in A Narrow Path."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-signature-hubinger"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed individual signatory",
            "sourceName": "Evan Hubinger",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-ressa",
      "label": "Maria Ressa",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named campaign advocate in UN-hosted prepared speech dated 22 September 2025.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-ressa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-ressa",
        "name": "Maria Ressa",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named campaign advocate in UN-hosted prepared speech dated 22 September 2025.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named campaign advocate in UN-hosted prepared speech dated 22 September 2025."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Maria Ressa publicly advocated the Global Call for AI Red Lines in a prepared statement associated with the UN General Assembly’s 80th-anniversary session on 22 September 2025. Campaign credits identify Arthur Grimonpont as having pitched the initiative to her.",
        "structuralRole": "A prominent public advocate carrying a campaign into an international venue",
        "significance": "Ressa’s participation supplies an unusually traceable example of outreach leading to public advocacy: the campaign credits the approach, and the submitted speech contains the named campaign. That is stronger evidence of coordinated communication than simultaneous statements on a broad theme.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded intervention",
            "text": "Page 3 of the UN-hosted prepared statement advocates the Global Call. The evidence establishes the content of the submitted speech and its venue, rather than a UN resolution or an agreement by governments. No payment to Ressa, script-approval arrangement or endorsement of every partner’s separate implementation plan is established in these records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              },
              {
                "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
                "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-approach",
              "w8-red-e-ressa-call",
              "w8-red-e-ressa-venue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Submitted statement page3; not a UN resolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
                "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocated named campaign in UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "sourceName": "Maria Ressa",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "22September2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-venue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
                "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
            "sourceName": "Maria Ressa",
            "targetName": "UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025",
            "date": "22September2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with pitching the campaign",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-approach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Arthur Grimonpont",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with pitching the campaign",
            "sourceName": "Arthur Grimonpont",
            "targetName": "Maria Ressa",
            "date": "Before September2025 announcement; exact date unreported"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway",
            "heading": "S3 — Dated launch and initial public framing",
            "text": "Candidate edges: CeSIA/TFS/CHAI → co-organized call; Maria Ressa → announced call on 22 September 2025; campaign → scheduled presentation at AI Safety Connect on 25 September. The government-uptake lane owns independent UN records.",
            "matched": [
              "Maria Ressa",
              "Ressa"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32781941812c26b56cf1601f71080f10ba1c8503dcaea963b0093670cedc8001"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway",
            "heading": "S3 — Dated launch and initial public framing",
            "text": "PDF page 1 identifies CeSIA, TFS and Berkeley CHAI as co-organizers alongside 20 partners, and reports over 200 individuals and 70 organizations. Page 3 says the call was “announced this morning by Maria Ressa” at the high-level meeting marking the UN's 80th anniversary, and schedules presentation at AI Safety Connect at UN Headquarters for 25 September. The latter is a planned event in this dated document; the announcement is an organizer-reported completed action. Neither establishes UN endorsement. The release seeks an enforced international agreement by end-2026; it does not present a negotiated treaty text.",
            "matched": [
              "Maria Ressa",
              "Ressa"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "068d248e3a36b6f95b079594d70a58340975954f97cf14c8123385465803e7af"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-bengio",
      "label": "Yoshua Bengio",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "International red-lines advocacy at the 24 September 2025 Security Council meeting; scoped automatic-transcript evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-bengio",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-bengio",
        "name": "Yoshua Bengio",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "International red-lines advocacy at the 24 September 2025 Security Council meeting; scoped automatic-transcript evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "International red-lines advocacy at the 24 September 2025 Security Council meeting; scoped automatic-transcript evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
            "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Yoshua Bengio advocated international AI red lines in an intervention at the UN Security Council’s 10,005th meeting on 24 September 2025. This entry follows that particular intervention and its policy setting.",
        "structuralRole": "Expert advocacy before a sovereign-security forum",
        "significance": "Bengio’s appearance shows the red-lines argument reaching a body associated with international security. That is a significant venue for persuasion, but the existence of a presentation is different from the Council agreeing to its proposals.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the meeting evidence shows",
            "text": "The retained automatic transcript records advocacy for international limits and disagreement within the same meeting. It is a scoped transcript source, not the official verbatim record or a Council resolution. The evidence supports his intervention in that debate; it does not establish adoption of a treaty or personal involvement in every campaign using the red-lines language.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
                "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-bengio-venue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-bengio-venue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
                "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UN Security Council meeting 10005",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advocated international red lines in recorded intervention",
            "sourceName": "Yoshua Bengio",
            "targetName": "UN Security Council meeting 10005",
            "date": "24September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
            "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-apollo-pr",
      "label": "Apollo Strategic Communications",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Campaign acknowledgements credit press-conference preparation/moderation. Distinct from Apollo Research and Apollo.io; fee and contract not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-apollo-pr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-apollo-pr",
        "name": "Apollo Strategic Communications",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Campaign acknowledgements credit press-conference preparation/moderation. Distinct from Apollo Research and Apollo.io; fee and contract not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Campaign acknowledgements credit press-conference preparation/moderation. Distinct from Apollo Research and Apollo.io; fee and contract not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Campaign acknowledgements credit press-conference preparation/moderation. Distinct from Apollo Research and Apollo.io; fee and contract not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited with press-conference preparation and moderation",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-work-apollo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited with press-conference preparation and moderation",
            "sourceName": "Apollo Strategic Communications",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-narrow-path",
      "label": "A Narrow Path",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A ControlAI-promoted framework proposing restrictions and oversight intended to prevent loss of control over advanced AI.",
      "aliases": [
        "GUARD",
        "Narrow Path"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "AI-governance proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-narrow-path",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-narrow-path",
        "name": "A Narrow Path",
        "role": "AI-governance proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A ControlAI-promoted framework proposing restrictions and oversight intended to prevent loss of control over advanced AI.",
        "why": "It shows what a campaigning organisation wants governments to build: proposed powers and institutions can be examined separately from whether lawmakers adopt them.",
        "about": [
          "A Narrow Path is distinct from the Global Call for AI Red Lines. Signing the latter does not endorse every proposal in the former. Proposed oversight bodies are proposals, not proof of an already operating authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "GUARD",
          "Narrow Path"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A ControlAI-promoted framework proposing restrictions and oversight intended to prevent loss of control over advanced AI.",
        "structuralRole": "A policy proposal setting out limits on advanced AI",
        "significance": "A Narrow Path is a proposed governance framework, so its importance lies in the restrictions and institutions it advocates and the people who carry those ideas into debate. Proposed powers must be distinguished from powers actually enacted or exercised.",
        "background": [
          "A Narrow Path is distinct from the Global Call for AI Red Lines. Signing the latter does not endorse every proposal in the former. Proposed oversight bodies are proposals, not proof of an already operating authority."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "ControlAI explicitly acknowledges unspecified red lines in the general call, then promotes its own prohibition and A Narrow Path. Does not bind other signatories.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "promotes ASI prohibition as red-lines implementation",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "A Narrow Path",
            "date": "25 September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority",
            "text": "The Global Call for AI Red Lines supplies a documented campaign-production chain: drafting, management, partner feedback and signatory work have named roles. CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI are organisers; ControlAI and FLI provided partner feedback. The Call is distinct from ControlAI's A Narrow Path . Evan Hubinger's signature does not assign him every proposal advanced by another participant. Advocacy and summit access also remain separate from government adoption. This branch supplies real coordination, with a bounded object and purpose. A4",
            "matched": [
              "A Narrow Path",
              "Narrow Path"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "42bc2037ad032c073e1140c5fd33c2483a642caf3a30f85c6c41b39fccb3b706"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-sprint",
      "label": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Fundraising proposal seeks lab-threshold harmonization and state-led international agreements. Goals and proposed partnerships are not completed actions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-sprint",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-sprint",
        "name": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Fundraising proposal seeks lab-threshold harmonization and state-led international agreements. Goals and proposed partnerships are not completed actions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fundraising proposal seeks lab-threshold harmonization and state-led international agreements. Goals and proposed partnerships are not completed actions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Fundraising proposal seeks lab-threshold harmonization and state-led international agreements. Goals and proposed partnerships are not completed actions.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD150000 request for Q1-Q22026; approximate full-year plan USD400000. Platform displays USD0, which excludes off-platform financing. Financial details: value: 150,000; currency: USD; kind: funding request; period: Q1-Q2 2026",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-solicitation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested funding for diplomatic follow-through",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
            "date": "Created Dec4,2025; later update undated"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Targets champion states, aligned lab thresholds and a UN resolution. Anticipates competitive benefit for Anthropic/DeepMind; their agreement is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-sprint-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes converting campaign support into agreements",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA 2026 diplomatic sprint",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "2026 plan, not completion"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-effektiv",
      "label": "Effektiv Spenden",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Reports organizational support to CeSIA and The Future Society following Longview recommendations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-effektiv",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-effektiv",
        "name": "Effektiv Spenden",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Reports organizational support to CeSIA and The Future Society following Longview recommendations.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reports organizational support to CeSIA and The Future Society following Longview recommendations."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Effektiv Spenden is a giving intermediary reporting organisational support to CeSIA and The Future Society following Longview Philanthropy recommendations. Its disclosures supply the onward-support stage in a route otherwise visible only as funding advice.",
        "structuralRole": "The link between a recommendation and reported onward support",
        "significance": "Recommending a grant and forwarding support are different actions, sometimes performed by different institutions. Effektiv Spenden’s account makes that division visible and helps avoid counting the same funding twice.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The reported allocations",
            "text": "The retained records describe EUR195,000 of CeSIA support associated with the first half of 2024 and forwarding in September. A March 2025 historical update describes TFS support and a combined EUR114,000 allocation, explicitly identifying an AI-fund portion. These are organisational-support disclosures; they do not earmark money to the September 2025 Global Call or provide its expenditure breakdown.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-eff-cesia",
              "w8-red-e-eff-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Funder-reported support. CeSIA forwarding September2024; TFS March2025 history explicitly names AI-fund portion, combined EUR114000 allocation in update. No campaign restriction. Financial details: value: 195,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported organizational support; period: H1/2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-eff-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported forwarding organizational support",
            "sourceName": "Effektiv Spenden",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "September2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Funder-reported support. CeSIA forwarding September2024; TFS March2025 history explicitly names AI-fund portion, combined EUR114000 allocation in update. No campaign restriction. Financial details: value: 114,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported organizational support; period: H2/2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-eff-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
                "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported forwarding organizational support",
            "sourceName": "Effektiv Spenden",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "March2025 history / H2/2024 allocation"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest financial connection is a shared intermediary: Effektiv Spenden reports supporting both CeSIA and The Future Society after Longview Philanthropy recommendations. These are organizational funding records. A separate CeSIA solicitation explicitly budgets Red Lines diplomatic follow-through. No inspected record establishes a paid, campaign-restricted grant, the launch's total cost, or donor authority over its wording.",
            "matched": [
              "Effektiv Spenden"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4917bf86923d5c70181ca4eff3649d3ab3e10e2b3a7dffb75faadc8f29a679c4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-effisciences",
      "label": "EffiSciences",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "SFF lists as receiving charity for the 2024 CeSIA recommendation; fiscal-sponsorship terms not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-effisciences",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-effisciences",
        "name": "EffiSciences",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "SFF lists as receiving charity for the 2024 CeSIA recommendation; fiscal-sponsorship terms not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "SFF lists as receiving charity for the 2024 CeSIA recommendation; fiscal-sponsorship terms not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "SFF lists as receiving charity for the 2024 CeSIA recommendation; fiscal-sponsorship terms not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Intermediary role named; legal agreement and onward transfer not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-effisciences"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed receiving charity for SFF recommendation",
            "sourceName": "EffiSciences",
            "targetName": "CeSIA",
            "date": "SFF2024; no second grant amount"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-unesco",
      "label": "UNESCO",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "UNESCO hosts civil-society and academic network → UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network. hosts civil-society and academic network",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-unesco",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-unesco",
        "name": "UNESCO",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "UNESCO hosts civil-society and academic network → UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network. hosts civil-society and academic network",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, hosts the civil-society and academic AI network launched in June 2025. It is also credited as an Athens Roundtable event partner in the organizer's account of the 4 December 2025 London meeting.",
        "structuralRole": "International institutional host and convening partner for AI-policy discussion",
        "significance": "Hosting a network and partnering in an event can give independent initiatives an organized setting and access to wider audiences. Those are meaningful channels for policy discussion, but they do not automatically make a subgroup's campaign a UNESCO policy or establish government adoption of its proposals.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two distinct institutional channels",
            "text": "The network provides a framework in which the International AI Red Lines subgroup operates. The Athens recap separately credits UNESCO as an event partner. The retained materials therefore establish hosting and convening relationships with particular dates; they do not supply an adoption decision, a campaign-specific funding allocation or a transfer of state rule-making authority to participants.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-unesco-network",
              "w8-red-e-athens-unesco"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-unesco-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
            "sourceName": "UNESCO",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": "LaunchedJune2025, before Global Call"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "credited as event partner",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-unesco"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited as event partner",
            "sourceName": "UNESCO",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025; recap p2"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure",
            "heading": "Institutional channels and a substantive age-policy bridge",
            "text": "The independent review also distinguishes two Delhi events on18February2026: the UNESCO-network Global South roundtable and the TFS/CeSIA AI Safety Connect session. Date and city do not make them one workshop.",
            "matched": [
              "UNESCO"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d06595ded9452bba9b8250d563ae35ea7459f7d3f734459a25577858befcbbed"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "Causal checks and stopping boundary",
            "text": "The strongest next acquisition is the actual briefing/transmission document at one conversion point: UNESCO subgroup to a government delegation, TFS/CeSIA workshop to India's working group, or ControlAI to Hunt. These can distinguish policy influence from ordinary participation without enlarging the membership roster.",
            "matched": [
              "UNESCO"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b6f86bfb77864a9a2c82133ef663ee5d969016a918d6e16b440cc6c393cadfc2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "Candidate typed relations (not yet canonical)",
            "text": "No adoption edge proposed for India, UNESCO, UK Government, UNGA, UNSC or Geneva based on this pass. No campaign-funding edge proposed from the UNESCO umbrella funding paragraph. A current institutional co-chair appointment is a separate governance relation, not evidence the appointment was caused by campaign participation.",
            "matched": [
              "UNESCO"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c1ee5e31cab00aa9a9c4cd5506b09d1ced0a6d0d1ccaad4cb4065be5008a8771"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway",
            "heading": "S4 — Documented route into summit programming",
            "text": "Page 1 names TFS as organizer with OECD and UNESCO and calls the event an official pre-summit event of the 2026 AI Impact Summit. Pages 4–6 explicitly build Dialogue 1 on the Global Call and a pre-event survey; participants would be grouped using survey responses and backgrounds, then produce a roadmap for later diplomatic forums. This is a designed agenda pathway, not just shared attendance.",
            "matched": [
              "UNESCO"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2d2e9c2c95b1fd48aa4a425c8bca4d867314701eb8c531b34b9c8d295ab4b7da"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-unesco-network",
      "label": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Umbrella network launched June 2025; funding and chronology distinct from the September campaign.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-unesco-network",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-unesco-network",
        "name": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Umbrella network launched June 2025; funding and chronology distinct from the September campaign.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Umbrella network launched June 2025; funding and chronology distinct from the September campaign."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UNESCO's civil-society and academic AI network is an umbrella framework launched in June 2025. Its history distinguishes an earlier UKRI-funded pilot from initial network support attributed to the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation. The International AI Red Lines subgroup works within this framework.",
        "structuralRole": "Hosted umbrella connecting academic and civil-society AI initiatives",
        "significance": "The network supplies an institutional setting in which groups can organize activity and find collaborators. Its launch and funding predate the later Global Call, so umbrella support cannot automatically be treated as a grant for that campaign or a delegation of UNESCO's authority to subgroup participants.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Network ancestry and subgroup scope",
            "text": "UNESCO's account attributes the preceding pilot to UKRI funding and the 2025 umbrella project to McGovern Foundation support. Its subgroup page describes International AI Red Lines activity within the network framework while preserving independent activity. The retained sources identify no campaign-specific allocation, state rule-making power or blanket UNESCO endorsement of every subgroup output.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-unesco-network",
              "w8-red-e-mcgovern-network",
              "w8-red-e-ukri-pilot",
              "w8-red-e-subgroup-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Independent activities; hosting does not delegate state rulemaking authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-subgroup-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "works within network framework",
            "sourceName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-unesco-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNESCO",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
            "sourceName": "UNESCO",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": "LaunchedJune2025, before Global Call"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Supports umbrella network through2025project. No amount or Global Call allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-mcgovern-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Patrick J. McGovern Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "initial network funding attributed by UNESCO",
            "sourceName": "Patrick J. McGovern Foundation",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": "2025 umbrella network"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Earlier pilot ancestry, not campaign funding or current subgroup grant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ukri-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funded preceding pilot per UNESCO history",
            "sourceName": "UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": "Pilot predates June2025 network"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "label": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "TFS and Ada co-lead; CeSIA member. Independent CSO work does not commit UNESCO or Member States.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
        "name": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "TFS and Ada co-lead; CeSIA member. Independent CSO work does not commit UNESCO or Member States.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TFS and Ada co-lead; CeSIA member. Independent CSO work does not commit UNESCO or Member States."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The International AI Red Lines subgroup is an independent civil-society working group within UNESCO’s civil-society and academic AI network. The Future Society and Ada Lovelace Institute are listed as co-leads, with CeSIA among the members.",
        "structuralRole": "An institutional venue for developing civil-society proposals",
        "significance": "The subgroup gives organisations working on international AI limits a continuing coordination structure beyond a launch event or petition. Its connection to UNESCO provides a recognised setting, while the authority to speak for member states remains elsewhere.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who participates and what the status means",
            "text": "The network identifies the two co-leads and CeSIA’s participation, and names Tereza Zoumpalova as a subgroup representative in its coordination group. These are organisational working roles, not UNESCO officer appointments or personal veto powers. The group’s independent activities do not commit UNESCO or its member states to a treaty, enforcement mechanism or the fuller policy programme of any participant.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-tfs-subgroup",
              "w8-red-e-ada-subgroup",
              "w8-red-e-cesia-subgroup",
              "w8-red-e-subgroup-network",
              "w8-red-e-tereza-representative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Independent CSO work under UNESCO network; does not commit UNESCO or member states.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-tfs-subgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
            "sourceName": "The Future Society",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organizational participation, not UNESCO officer status or personal veto rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-tereza-representative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tereza Zoumpalova",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named subgroup representative in coordination group",
            "sourceName": "Tereza Zoumpalova",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Independent activities; hosting does not delegate state rulemaking authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-subgroup-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "works within network framework",
            "sourceName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "listed subgroup co-lead",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ada-subgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ada Lovelace Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
            "sourceName": "Ada Lovelace Institute",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "listed subgroup member",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-cesia-subgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed subgroup member",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-ada",
      "label": "Ada Lovelace Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed as co-lead of the UNESCO-network red-lines subgroup.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-ada",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-ada",
        "name": "Ada Lovelace Institute",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Listed as co-lead of the UNESCO-network red-lines subgroup.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed as co-lead of the UNESCO-network red-lines subgroup."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed as co-lead of the UNESCO-network red-lines subgroup.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "listed subgroup co-lead",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ada-subgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
            "sourceName": "Ada Lovelace Institute",
            "targetName": "International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "date": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-mcgovern",
      "label": "Patrick J. McGovern Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "UNESCO attributes initial umbrella-network support to this foundation; no campaign-specific grant established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-mcgovern",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-mcgovern",
        "name": "Patrick J. McGovern Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "UNESCO attributes initial umbrella-network support to this foundation; no campaign-specific grant established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "UNESCO attributes initial umbrella-network support to this foundation; no campaign-specific grant established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UNESCO attributes initial umbrella-network support to this foundation; no campaign-specific grant established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Supports umbrella network through2025project. No amount or Global Call allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-mcgovern-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
                "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "initial network funding attributed by UNESCO",
            "sourceName": "Patrick J. McGovern Foundation",
            "targetName": "UNESCO civil-society and academic AI network",
            "date": "2025 umbrella network"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-clement-jones",
      "label": "Lord Tim Clement-Jones",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate of the Global Call.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-clement-jones",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-clement-jones",
        "name": "Lord Tim Clement-Jones",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate of the Global Call.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate of the Global Call."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lord Tim Clement-Jones is recorded as a self-described signatory and parliamentary advocate of the Global Call for AI Red Lines. His January 2026 statement brings an international advocacy campaign into a UK parliamentary setting.",
        "structuralRole": "A parliamentary advocate for an international campaign",
        "significance": "His role is a route for a campaign’s proposed safeguards to be voiced within a legislature. Public advocacy can increase visibility and create a record for later proposals, but a parliamentarian’s participation is different from government commissioning or accepting the campaign’s treaty approach.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the record establishes",
            "text": "The retained statement is dated 29 January 2026. It supports his claimed signature and advocacy of the Global Call. It does not establish that the UK government adopted every red line or delegated policy-setting authority to the campaign’s organisers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-clement-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Parliamentary advocacy. Government commissioning or acceptance of campaign treaty unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-clement-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
                "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate",
            "sourceName": "Lord Tim Clement-Jones",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "29January2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "4. The campaign reached a UK parliamentary demand; ControlAI support is separately acknowledged",
            "text": "The earned mechanism is acknowledged NGO support and a signatory's explicit parliamentary advocacy. Support is not evidence of a payment, authorship of Hunt's speech, or government commissioning. Clement-Jones's interpretation of the call must not silently replace the campaign's own text. The minister's response is not a comprehensive proof of permanent rejection. Web reader content inspected; native GET returned403, so no original-HTML hash or retained bytes claimed. Needed: the actual briefing sent to Hunt/Clement-Jones, correspondence on requested wording, and any departmental response to the specific campaign proposal.",
            "matched": [
              "Clement-Jones"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c9f90ea4115f68fa157b1ea2b7d6130420f8e6abb1563d8ce2f256d6bc0bbc38"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
            "title": "Baseline evidence custody"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "TFS-organized policy forum; report links agenda to Global Call and records a 5Rights policy-model presentation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-athens2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "name": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "TFS-organized policy forum; report links agenda to Global Call and records a 5Rights policy-model presentation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TFS-organized policy forum; report links agenda to Global Call and records a 5Rights policy-model presentation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The seventh Athens Roundtable was a policy forum organised by The Future Society in London on 4 December 2025. Its reported agenda built on the Global Call for AI Red Lines and included a 5Rights presentation on child-rights safeguards for AI.",
        "structuralRole": "A convening point between campaigners, experts and international institutions",
        "significance": "The event brings several branches of this investigation into one working setting: AI red-lines advocacy, child-rights policy models, legal expertise and international-organisation participation. Its value as evidence lies in the actual programme, presentations and private discussion, not an assumption that all attendees agreed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who provided the setting and support",
            "text": "The event report credits UNESCO and OECD as partners, and Cooperative AI Foundation, Arnold & Porter, Fathom and deliberAIde for support without assigning amounts or editorial rights. Cooperative AI Foundation reports hosting the preceding speakers’ reception at the House of Lords. The programme included a private red-lines dialogue; Leanda Barrington-Leach presented child-rights safeguards. An attributed TFS testimonial also describes deliberAIde assisting engagement and report production. A parliamentary venue or partner logo is not, by itself, government adoption of the programme.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              },
              {
                "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-tfs",
              "w8-red-e-athens-call",
              "w8-red-e-athens-unesco",
              "w8-red-e-athens-oecd",
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-caf",
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-arnold",
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-fathom",
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-deliberaide",
              "w8-red-e-leanda-athens",
              "w8-follow-e-annual-event",
              "w8-follow-e-reception",
              "w8-follow-e-dialogue-part",
              "w8-follow-e-deliberaide-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organizer account of program continuity, not proof every attendee endorsed campaign.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "developed agenda building on campaign",
            "sourceName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "seventh edition of event series",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-annual-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable event series",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "seventh edition of event series",
            "sourceName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable event series",
            "date": "4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "organized policy roundtable",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "organized policy roundtable",
            "sourceName": "The Future Society",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Reported assistance with engagement and report production; not a verified donation, executed processing agreement or editorial authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-deliberaide-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "deliberAIde platform",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "platform use reported in attributed client testimonial",
            "sourceName": "deliberAIde platform",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "Testimonial explicitly names Athens2025; exact service period unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "House of Lords venue; no parliamentary endorsement inferred. Previous evening implies3December from known4December event.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-reception"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports hosting preceding speakers reception",
            "sourceName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "3December2025 inferred; event4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Event recap p23 identifies speaker and account of remarks; not independently watched video.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-leanda-athens"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "presented child-rights AI safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-arnold"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Arnold & Porter",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
            "sourceName": "Arnold & Porter",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "included private red-lines discussion",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-dialogue-part"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "included private red-lines discussion",
            "sourceName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "targetName": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
            "date": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
      "label": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "5Rights executive director identified in the event recap; advocated the UK Children's Code as an AI safeguard model.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-barrington-leach",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
        "name": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "5Rights executive director identified in the event recap; advocated the UK Children's Code as an AI safeguard model.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "5Rights executive director identified in the event recap; advocated the UK Children's Code as an AI safeguard model."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Leanda Barrington-Leach was identified as 5Rights Foundation's executive director at the Athens Roundtable held in London on 4 December 2025. The organizer's recap attributes to her an argument for using the UK Age Appropriate Design Code as a model for AI safety by design.",
        "structuralRole": "Speaker carrying an established child-design policy model into an AI-governance forum",
        "significance": "Her intervention connects online child-rights regulation with AI governance through a specific proposed precedent. It shows what policy was being advocated at the event, rather than treating attendance as evidence of agreement with every other speaker or initiative associated with the forum.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The substantive bridge",
            "text": "Page 23 of the event recap describes Barrington-Leach's child-rights safeguards and her use of the UK code as an AI design model. The same page attributes a Greek kids-wallet example to a different speaker, Ambassador George Pagoulatos. That distinction preserves who proposed what: the retained account supports her design-code argument, not attribution of the wallet proposal or a universal identification demand to her.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-leanda-role",
              "w8-red-e-leanda-athens",
              "w8-red-e-leanda-code"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "identified as executive director at event",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-leanda-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "identified as executive director at event",
            "sourceName": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "targetName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "date": "4December2025; historical event role"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Specific policy-model transmission at Athens. Does not establish mandatory identity checking, an enacted rule or shared command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-leanda-code"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advocated as model for AI safety by design",
            "sourceName": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "targetName": "UK Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "date": "4December2025; PDFp23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Event recap p23 identifies speaker and account of remarks; not independently watched video.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-leanda-athens"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "presented child-rights AI safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure",
            "heading": "Institutional channels and a substantive age-policy bridge",
            "text": "Page23 reports 5Rights executive director Leanda Barrington-Leach advocating the UK's Age Appropriate Design Code as a model for AI safety by design. This is a specific policy model being carried into the AI-governance forum. The same page separately attributes Greece's kids-wallet age-verification example to Ambassador George Pagoulatos. Do not attribute his example to Leanda, infer that the Global Call demands it, or say age verification was absent from the event. Video links were extracted but the video was not watched; the organizer's recap remains the source of the account.",
            "matched": [
              "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
              "Barrington-Leach"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ad87b81b0d4acdf7730e77bed63f1c8a1ce1b79919f316f355ac4a5061e5cc61"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-childrens-code",
      "label": "UK Age Appropriate Design Code",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Policy model explicitly invoked at the AI forum. This source does not establish a new identity-check mandate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-childrens-code",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-childrens-code",
        "name": "UK Age Appropriate Design Code",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Policy model explicitly invoked at the AI forum. This source does not establish a new identity-check mandate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Policy model explicitly invoked at the AI forum. This source does not establish a new identity-check mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Policy model explicitly invoked at the AI forum. This source does not establish a new identity-check mandate.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Specific policy-model transmission at Athens. Does not establish mandatory identity checking, an enacted rule or shared command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-leanda-code"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advocated as model for AI safety by design",
            "sourceName": "Leanda Barrington-Leach",
            "targetName": "UK Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "date": "4December2025; PDFp23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "label": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "CAIF, UK charity1201294/company13485176. Reports hosting Athens speakers' reception and advocating multi-agent monitoring. Organizational backing distinct from event allocation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "name": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CAIF, UK charity1201294/company13485176. Reports hosting Athens speakers' reception and advocating multi-agent monitoring. Organizational backing distinct from event allocation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAIF, UK charity1201294/company13485176. Reports hosting Athens speakers' reception and advocating multi-agent monitoring. Organizational backing distinct from event allocation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Cooperative AI Foundation is a UK charity and company supporting research on cooperation and risks in systems with multiple AI agents. It supported the 2025 Athens Roundtable and reports hosting the speakers’ reception before the event.",
        "structuralRole": "A funder and convener connecting multi-agent research with governance proposals",
        "significance": "CAIF brings research funding and a specific technical concern—how interacting agents behave—into the red-lines policy discussion. Its participation in a joint research competition provides a practical route for that concern to become funded work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Support, governance and research agenda",
            "text": "CAIF reports a USD15 million philanthropic commitment from Macroscopic Ventures; payment timing and event allocation are undisclosed. Jesse Clifton, described as a Macroscopic grantmaking officer in a recipient-hosted biography, was appointed a director on 6 June 2025. CAIF reports advocating multi-agent risk monitoring in the Athens private dialogue and jointly considers applications to Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World. These are distinct funding, governance and agenda links; the House of Lords reception venue does not establish parliamentary endorsement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-caf",
              "w8-follow-e-reception",
              "w8-follow-e-caif-monitoring",
              "w8-follow-e-macroscopic-commitment",
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-appointment",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-caif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-caif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
            "sourceName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Appointment event; does not establish donor appointment rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-appointment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jesse Clifton",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appointed director",
            "sourceName": "Jesse Clifton",
            "targetName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "date": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD15million organizational commitment; payment dates, conditions and Athens allocation not obtained. Financial details: value: 15,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported philanthropic commitment; period: unspecified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-macroscopic-commitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Macroscopic Ventures",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "philanthropic commitment reported by recipient",
            "sourceName": "Macroscopic Ventures",
            "targetName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "House of Lords venue; no parliamentary endorsement inferred. Previous evening implies3December from known4December event.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-reception"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports hosting preceding speakers reception",
            "sourceName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "3December2025 inferred; event4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-caf"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
            "sourceName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named contribution to discussion; acceptance unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-caif-monitoring"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports advocating multi-agent risk monitoring",
            "sourceName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
            "date": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The support layer now has two concrete operational links: Cooperative AI Foundation (CAIF) reports hosting the speakers' reception and contributing to the private red-lines discussion; deliberAIde publishes a named TFS testimonial about its platform helping with the event and report. Fathom is resolved to the AI-governance nonprofit at fathom.org, FEIN 93-4840479, whose own current site describes a TFS partnership on verified redlines. No inspected source assigns a 2025 Athens payment amount or grants editorial approval rights.",
            "matched": [
              "Cooperative AI Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4778fe2313cdcf6b0dd95e6bf04bc3c34e2998a3eb8856d0f85622b1addae498"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-arnold-porter",
      "label": "Arnold & Porter",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Credited event supporter; exact contracting entity, support form and amount unspecified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-arnold-porter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-arnold-porter",
        "name": "Arnold & Porter",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Credited event supporter; exact contracting entity, support form and amount unspecified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Credited event supporter; exact contracting entity, support form and amount unspecified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Credited event supporter; exact contracting entity, support form and amount unspecified.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-arnold"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
            "sourceName": "Arnold & Porter",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-fathom",
      "label": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Resolved to fathom.org, self-disclosed FEIN93-4840479. Current TFS verified-redlines partnership; event-series financial support separately reported. No verified2025amount.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-fathom",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-fathom",
        "name": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Resolved to fathom.org, self-disclosed FEIN93-4840479. Current TFS verified-redlines partnership; event-series financial support separately reported. No verified2025amount.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Resolved to fathom.org, self-disclosed FEIN93-4840479. Current TFS verified-redlines partnership; event-series financial support separately reported. No verified2025amount."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom partnerships",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens series history",
            "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
            "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Fathom is an AI-governance nonprofit identified here with fathom.org and self-disclosed FEIN 93-4840479. Its work spans a verified-redlines partnership with The Future Society, support for the Athens Roundtable series, verification proposals and sponsorship of California SB813.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy designer with an interest in operating verification infrastructure",
        "significance": "Fathom connects advocacy about what AI should be allowed to do with proposals for how compliance could be verified. The earlier SB813 record is particularly revealing because the organisation both sponsored legislation and reportedly hoped to qualify for a recognised-operator role contemplated by that version.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The proposal and the prospective operator",
            "text": "The 2025 Judiciary account records Fathom’s aspiration to become an MRO and its belief that it was qualified. That is a historical prospective role, not a designation or awarded monopoly. Later Paris simulation and Ashby materials discuss verification, safeguards and commercial incentives; they do not establish an operating government system. The retained SB813 status is enrolled, with enactment unestablished. Event-series funding is acknowledged separately, without a verified amount or allocation to the September 2025 campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fathom partnerships",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
              },
              {
                "title": "Athens series history",
                "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
                "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
                "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
                "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-fathom",
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-tfs",
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-series",
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-sponsor",
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-prospective-mro",
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-paris",
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-ashby"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official author/committee identify sponsorship. Does not establish exclusive drafting/approval. Meridian arm is attributed, legal identity unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-sponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
                "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sponsors legislative proposal",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "First announcement26March2025; subsequent sponsor status in packet"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No actual insurance schedule, procurement gate or single deployed identity system acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-ashby"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
                "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive proposals",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes verification and commercial-incentive proposals",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive proposals",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current organizational collaboration; not proof of September2025 campaign financing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-tfs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fathom partnerships",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Future Society",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly describes verified-redlines partnership",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "The Future Society",
            "date": "Observed9September2026; start unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Judiciary pp1/9 report Fathom hoped to be an MRO and considered itself qualified. Historical aspiration, not designation, award or monopoly.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-prospective-mro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported seeking prospective recognized-operator role",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
            "date": "2025-04-29 – 2025-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Reported unresolved safeguards and differing participant assessments; not operational government arrangement or cover-up.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-paris"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
                "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Paris verification simulation —2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes reported verification simulation findings",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Paris verification simulation —2026",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-fathom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Organizer-reported funding; no amount, year or2025allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-series"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens series history",
                "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable event series",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "financial support acknowledged by event series",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable event series",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom partnerships",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens series history",
            "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
            "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          },
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "Assurance markets: implementation and incentives"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-deliberaide",
      "label": "deliberAIde platform",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Brand resolved to deliberaide.com; attributed TFS testimonial describes event/report workflow. Legal operator and event-specific terms remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-deliberaide",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-deliberaide",
        "name": "deliberAIde platform",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Brand resolved to deliberaide.com; attributed TFS testimonial describes event/report workflow. Legal operator and event-specific terms remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Brand resolved to deliberaide.com; attributed TFS testimonial describes event/report workflow. Legal operator and event-specific terms remain unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "deliberAIde is a platform identified with deliberaide.com that was credited in support of the December 2025 Athens Roundtable. An attributed Future Society testimonial describes assistance with participant engagement and the production of the event report.",
        "structuralRole": "Software supporting the conversion of discussion into a published account",
        "significance": "The platform is relevant because the mechanics of collecting contributions and preparing a report can influence what survives from a policy event. Its precise role should be understood through the workflow, rather than assumed from its inclusion among supporters.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What is publicly attributed",
            "text": "The roundtable’s report credits deliberAIde, while the testimonial describes its practical use. The legal operator, event-specific contract, data-processing terms and editorial authority remain unresolved. The evidence supports a reported service contribution; it does not establish a cash donation or that the platform independently decided the report’s policy conclusions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-deliberaide",
              "w8-follow-e-deliberaide-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Reported assistance with engagement and report production; not a verified donation, executed processing agreement or editorial authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-deliberaide-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "platform use reported in attributed client testimonial",
            "sourceName": "deliberAIde platform",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "Testimonial explicitly names Athens2025; exact service period unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-athens-support-deliberaide"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
            "sourceName": "deliberAIde platform",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-india-workshop",
      "label": "AI Safety Connect India red-lines workshop",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "February 2026 TFS/CeSIA workshop. Not the government summit declaration or a negotiated agreement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-india-workshop",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-india-workshop",
        "name": "AI Safety Connect India red-lines workshop",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "February 2026 TFS/CeSIA workshop. Not the government summit declaration or a negotiated agreement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "February 2026 TFS/CeSIA workshop. Not the government summit declaration or a negotiated agreement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "February 2026 TFS/CeSIA workshop. Not the government summit declaration or a negotiated agreement.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Organizer-reported session. Government declaration is separately voluntary/nonbinding; no drafting link established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-india-cesia"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported workshop co-organization",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Connect India red-lines workshop",
            "date": "February2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-unga80",
      "label": "UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Maria Ressa submitted campaign-bearing speech → UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025. submitted campaign-bearing speech",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-unga80",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-unga80",
        "name": "UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Maria Ressa submitted campaign-bearing speech → UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025. submitted campaign-bearing speech",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Maria Ressa submitted campaign-bearing speech → UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025. submitted campaign-bearing speech",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-ressa-venue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
                "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Maria Ressa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
            "sourceName": "Maria Ressa",
            "targetName": "UNGA 80th anniversary session — 22 September 2025",
            "date": "22September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-unsc10005",
      "label": "UN Security Council meeting 10005",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Yoshua Bengio advocated international red lines in recorded intervention → UN Security Council meeting 10005. UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-unsc10005",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-unsc10005",
        "name": "UN Security Council meeting 10005",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Yoshua Bengio advocated international red lines in recorded intervention → UN Security Council meeting 10005. UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
            "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Yoshua Bengio advocated international red lines in recorded intervention → UN Security Council meeting 10005. UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-bengio-venue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
                "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Yoshua Bengio",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advocated international red lines in recorded intervention",
            "sourceName": "Yoshua Bengio",
            "targetName": "UN Security Council meeting 10005",
            "date": "24September2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
            "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-renaissance",
      "label": "Renaissance Numerique",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "TFS survey methodology credits jointly consolidating fifteen workshop priorities into ten survey options.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-renaissance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-renaissance",
        "name": "Renaissance Numerique",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "TFS survey methodology credits jointly consolidating fifteen workshop priorities into ten survey options.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TFS survey methodology credits jointly consolidating fifteen workshop priorities into ten survey options."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "TFS survey methodology credits jointly consolidating fifteen workshop priorities into ten survey options.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-survey-renaissance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
            "sourceName": "Renaissance Numerique",
            "targetName": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "date": "February2025 survey; April2report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-survey",
      "label": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "44 anonymous self-identified representatives ranked curated options; not a representative global consensus measurement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-red-survey",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-survey",
        "name": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
        "role": "Research",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "44 anonymous self-identified representatives ranked curated options; not a representative global consensus measurement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "44 anonymous self-identified representatives ranked curated options; not a representative global consensus measurement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "44 anonymous self-identified representatives ranked curated options; not a representative global consensus measurement.",
        "structuralRole": "Research",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-survey-renaissance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Renaissance Numerique",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
            "sourceName": "Renaissance Numerique",
            "targetName": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "date": "February2025 survey; April2report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The acknowledgements credit survey work; draft timing and survey do not establish that survey results caused the initial draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-red-e-survey-reference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "survey cited in campaign development credits",
            "sourceName": "February 2025 civil-society priority survey",
            "targetName": "Global Call for AI Red Lines",
            "date": "February chronology has unresolved day-level ordering"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-macroscopic",
      "label": "Macroscopic Ventures",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "CAIF names this philanthropic backer; legal grantor and receipt schedule remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-macroscopic",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-macroscopic",
        "name": "Macroscopic Ventures",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CAIF names this philanthropic backer; legal grantor and receipt schedule remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAIF names this philanthropic backer; legal grantor and receipt schedule remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Macroscopic Ventures is identified by Cooperative AI Foundation as a philanthropic backer making a USD15 million organisational commitment. CAIF also describes director Jesse Clifton as a Macroscopic grantmaking officer.",
        "structuralRole": "A substantial funding commitment alongside a governance overlap",
        "significance": "The amount and named professional overlap make this a salient upstream entry. They raise separate questions about funding conditions and a recipient board member’s authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What attaches to the commitment",
            "text": "The USD15 million is a recipient-reported commitment. The retained material does not identify the legal grantor, payment schedule, conditions or allocation to the Athens Roundtable. Clifton’s appointment is separately recorded; his role does not establish a donor appointment right. These distinctions preserve the importance of the connection without turning an announcement into an executed control agreement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-macroscopic-commitment",
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-donor-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD15million organizational commitment; payment dates, conditions and Athens allocation not obtained. Financial details: value: 15,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported philanthropic commitment; period: unspecified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-macroscopic-commitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "philanthropic commitment reported by recipient",
            "sourceName": "Macroscopic Ventures",
            "targetName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current recipient-hosted biography; historical role start and overlap on appointment day not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-donor-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jesse Clifton",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "listed as grantmaking officer",
            "sourceName": "Jesse Clifton",
            "targetName": "Macroscopic Ventures",
            "date": "Undated page observed9September2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Candidate directional relations for root: Fathom → TFS, publicly described verified-redlines partnership, date unknown/current observation; Fathom → Athens series, organizer-reported financial support, date and amount unknown; CAIF → Athens 2025 speakers, hosted reception, reported; CAIF → Athens private red-lines dialogue, advocated multi-agent monitoring, reported contribution with acceptance unknown; Macroscopic Ventures → CAIF, philanthropic commitment, USD 15,000,000, organizational rather than event allocation; Jesse Clifton → CAIF, director from 6 June 2025, with separately attributed funder role; deliberAIde platform → Athens 2025 workflow, use reported in an attributed client testimonial. Do not turn reception venue into parliamentary endorsement, a software workflow into editorial control, or organizational backing into a campaign-restricted grant.",
            "matched": [
              "Macroscopic Ventures"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a188ea8c5f0f4a8b5674af1742c22480af876cd055b17036f6f6a783e39f6642"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-clifton",
      "label": "Jesse Clifton",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CAIF trustee listed as Macroscopic grantmaking officer. Director appointment6June2025 separately recorded; funder appointment rights not established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-clifton",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-clifton",
        "name": "Jesse Clifton",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CAIF trustee listed as Macroscopic grantmaking officer. Director appointment6June2025 separately recorded; funder appointment rights not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAIF trustee listed as Macroscopic grantmaking officer. Director appointment6June2025 separately recorded; funder appointment rights not established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Jesse Clifton was appointed a Cooperative AI Foundation director on 6 June 2025. A recipient-hosted biography describes him as a Macroscopic Ventures grantmaking officer; CAIF names Macroscopic as a substantial philanthropic backer.",
        "structuralRole": "A person connecting a funder’s work and a recipient board",
        "significance": "The roles establish a meaningful governance overlap. They do not establish that a donor possesses a contractual appointment right or can direct a particular event or grant.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Timing and authority",
            "text": "The company record supplies the appointment date. The biography supplies the grantmaking role without establishing its starting date or whether it existed on appointment day. CAIF separately reports a USD15 million Macroscopic commitment. Appointment procedures and any reserved donor rights are the relevant missing evidence; the amount alone cannot establish those powers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-appointment",
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-donor-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Appointment event; does not establish donor appointment rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-appointment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appointed director",
            "sourceName": "Jesse Clifton",
            "targetName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "date": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current recipient-hosted biography; historical role start and overlap on appointment day not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-clifton-donor-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Macroscopic Ventures",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "listed as grantmaking officer",
            "sourceName": "Jesse Clifton",
            "targetName": "Macroscopic Ventures",
            "date": "Undated page observed9September2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-athens-series",
      "label": "Athens Roundtable event series",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Series-level financial support must not be allocated to a particular annual event without evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-athens-series",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-athens-series",
        "name": "Athens Roundtable event series",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Series-level financial support must not be allocated to a particular annual event without evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Series-level financial support must not be allocated to a particular annual event without evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens series history",
            "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Series-level financial support must not be allocated to a particular annual event without evidence.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "seventh edition of event series",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-annual-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
                "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "seventh edition of event series",
            "sourceName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable event series",
            "date": "4December2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Organizer-reported funding; no amount, year or2025allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-fathom-series"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Athens series history",
                "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "financial support acknowledged by event series",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Athens Roundtable event series",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens series history",
            "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
      "label": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Participant accounts describe policy contributions; acceptance or official adoption requires separate evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
        "name": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Participant accounts describe policy contributions; acceptance or official adoption requires separate evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Participant accounts describe policy contributions; acceptance or official adoption requires separate evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Participant accounts describe policy contributions; acceptance or official adoption requires separate evidence.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named contribution to discussion; acceptance unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-caif-monitoring"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports advocating multi-agent risk monitoring",
            "sourceName": "Cooperative AI Foundation",
            "targetName": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
            "date": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "included private red-lines discussion",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-dialogue-part"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "included private red-lines discussion",
            "sourceName": "Athens Roundtable — London, 4 December 2025",
            "targetName": "Athens2025 private red-lines dialogue",
            "date": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
            "title": "athens support layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-france-g7",
      "label": "French G7 presidency2026",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "CeSIA targeted as champion-state opportunity → French G7 presidency2026. Project intention, not government acceptance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-france-g7",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-france-g7",
        "name": "French G7 presidency2026",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "CeSIA targeted as champion-state opportunity → French G7 presidency2026. Project intention, not government acceptance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "France's 2026 G7 presidency appears in the corpus as a diplomatic opportunity targeted by CeSIA's AI red-lines campaign plan and as an institutional label associated with a March conference. These are two different reported relationships with the presidency.",
        "structuralRole": "Political calendar and convening opportunity sought by an advocacy campaign",
        "significance": "A presidency can provide timing, visibility and access to a group of governments, which explains why a campaign would seek a champion state there. An organizer's account of a G7 label can establish affiliation of an event without demonstrating adoption of the campaign's substantive proposals.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Intention and attributed recognition",
            "text": "CeSIA's diplomatic-sprint proposal identifies the French presidency as a champion-state opportunity. Its report on the 10 March 2026 Sciences Po conference says a G7 label was awarded. The retained record does not contain the award instrument or its scope, and neither source establishes French government acceptance of a coordinated slowdown proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
                "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-france",
              "w8-follow-e-g7-label"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Project intention, not government acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-france"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "targeted as champion-state opportunity",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "French G7 presidency2026",
            "date": "2026 diplomatic plan"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Award instrument and scope not obtained; not endorsement of a slowdown proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-label"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
                "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "G7 label awarded according to organizer",
            "sourceName": "French G7 presidency2026",
            "targetName": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "date": "March2026 event; later organizer account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
            "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-mirlesse",
      "label": "Alexandre Mirlesse",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "French foreign-ministry AI/tech diplomat in March2026 programme; scheduled moderator, not inferred attendee or G7 drafting official.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-mirlesse",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-mirlesse",
        "name": "Alexandre Mirlesse",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "French foreign-ministry AI/tech diplomat in March2026 programme; scheduled moderator, not inferred attendee or G7 drafting official.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "French foreign-ministry AI/tech diplomat in March2026 programme; scheduled moderator, not inferred attendee or G7 drafting official."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Alexandre Mirlesse is identified in a March 2026 Sciences Po programme as a French foreign-ministry AI and technology diplomat. The programme scheduled him to moderate the 10 March conference associated with CeSIA.",
        "structuralRole": "Diplomatic professional named in an AI-policy event programme",
        "significance": "A named moderator provides a concrete institutional contact at a planned event. The evidential value is access through programming: it does not by itself demonstrate attendance, receipt of an advocacy briefing or authority to negotiate for the G7.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Programmed role",
            "text": "The official Sciences Po event listing records Mirlesse's scheduled moderation. The retained source is the programme, so the profile does not convert that listing into a completed appearance, a G7 drafting role or government adoption of the event's proposals.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
                "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-mirlesse-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Programme connection; attendance, briefing receipt and negotiating mandate unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-mirlesse-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
                "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "scheduled moderator in institutional programme",
            "sourceName": "Alexandre Mirlesse",
            "targetName": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "date": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
      "label": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Institutional event programme records co-organization and scheduled diplomatic participants.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
        "name": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Institutional event programme records co-organization and scheduled diplomatic participants.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Institutional event programme records co-organization and scheduled diplomatic participants."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "redlines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Institutional event programme records co-organization and scheduled diplomatic participants.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Programme connection; attendance, briefing receipt and negotiating mandate unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-mirlesse-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
                "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alexandre Mirlesse",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "scheduled moderator in institutional programme",
            "sourceName": "Alexandre Mirlesse",
            "targetName": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "date": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Host programme plus organizer retrospective; not state endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-cesia-event"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
                "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
                "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CeSIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named event co-organizer",
            "sourceName": "CeSIA",
            "targetName": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "date": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Award instrument and scope not obtained; not endorsement of a slowdown proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-label"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
                "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "French G7 presidency2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "G7 label awarded according to organizer",
            "sourceName": "French G7 presidency2026",
            "targetName": "Sciences Po/CeSIA conference — 10March2026",
            "date": "March2026 event; later organizer account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "label": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers committed to risk-framework comparability discussions → G7 risk-framework comparability discussions. Official future-work commitment with international evaluation network and OECD; no common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
        "name": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers committed to risk-framework comparability discussions → G7 risk-framework comparability discussions. Official future-work commitment with international evaluation network and OECD; no common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The G7 Digital and Technology Ministers are the ministerial forum behind the 29 May 2026 declaration on digital technology and a common set of principles for minors' online safety. Their official commitments combine AI risk-framework discussion with support for openness and wider adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Political coordination forum translating shared priorities into national follow-up",
        "significance": "Ministerial agreement can organize future work and make domestic proposals part of a shared agenda, but it does not itself supply each country's legal powers. The retained declarations show both risk coordination and an innovation agenda, so neither should be erased when interpreting the group's direction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Commitments and follow-up",
            "text": "The ministers committed to discussion of risk-framework comparability with an international evaluation network and the OECD, without adopting a common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger. They also adopted minors principles. UNICEF reported supplying evidence beforehand. On 17 June, G7 leaders asked ministers to meet regularly and review progress by year end; the record establishes that request, not a completed review or a common implementing law.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              },
              {
                "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
              },
              {
                "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
                "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-comparability",
              "w8-follow-e-g7-openness",
              "w9-assure-e-g7-ministers",
              "w9-assure-e-g7-unicef",
              "w9-assure-e-g7-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
              "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official future-work commitment with international evaluation network and OECD; no common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-comparability"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 risk-framework comparability discussions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "committed to risk-framework comparability discussions",
            "sourceName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "targetName": "G7 risk-framework comparability discussions",
            "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Page2 explicitly connects openness with innovation and adoption. This official position coexists with risk-framework coordination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-openness"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 AI openness and adoption programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "promoted AI openness and broader adoption",
            "sourceName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "targetName": "G7 AI openness and adoption programme",
            "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Political agreement29May; domestic law supplies compulsion. Current PDF export17June.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-ministers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopt shared minors principles",
            "sourceName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "targetName": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF3 asks for progress assessment by end2026; no completed review inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 heads of state and government",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests regular meetings and year-end progress review",
            "sourceName": "G7 heads of state and government",
            "targetName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Original package, receipt, adopted wording and implementation plan not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-unicef"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
                "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UNICEF",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports providing advance evidence",
            "sourceName": "UNICEF",
            "targetName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "date": "Before meetings; reported1June2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          },
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-risk-comparability",
      "label": "G7 risk-framework comparability discussions",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Public commitment to future discussions in ministerial declaration; not an adopted common threshold or slowdown trigger.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-risk-comparability",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-risk-comparability",
        "name": "G7 risk-framework comparability discussions",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Public commitment to future discussions in ministerial declaration; not an adopted common threshold or slowdown trigger.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public commitment to future discussions in ministerial declaration; not an adopted common threshold or slowdown trigger."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public commitment to future discussions in ministerial declaration; not an adopted common threshold or slowdown trigger.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official future-work commitment with international evaluation network and OECD; no common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-comparability"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "committed to risk-framework comparability discussions",
            "sourceName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "targetName": "G7 risk-framework comparability discussions",
            "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-g7-open-ai",
      "label": "G7 AI openness and adoption programme",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Official ministerial declaration also promotes openness, innovation and broader AI adoption.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w8-follow-g7-open-ai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-g7-open-ai",
        "name": "G7 AI openness and adoption programme",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Official ministerial declaration also promotes openness, innovation and broader AI adoption.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official ministerial declaration also promotes openness, innovation and broader AI adoption."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official ministerial declaration also promotes openness, innovation and broader AI adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Page2 explicitly connects openness with innovation and adoption. This official position coexists with risk-framework coordination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w8-follow-e-g7-openness"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "promoted AI openness and broader adoption",
            "sourceName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "targetName": "G7 AI openness and adoption programme",
            "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
            "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Advertised research competition ceiling up to USD10m, not paid cash or separately established legal entity. Awards expected autumn2026; no partner allocations acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "name": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Advertised research competition ceiling up to USD10m, not paid cash or separately established legal entity. Awards expected autumn2026; no partner allocations acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advertised research competition ceiling up to USD10m, not paid cash or separately established legal entity. Awards expected autumn2026; no partner allocations acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
            "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World is a research competition advertising up to USD10 million, supported by Cooperative AI Foundation, Schmidt Sciences, ARIA and DeepMind. Its agenda includes coordination, monitoring and admission mechanisms for systems containing multiple AI agents.",
        "structuralRole": "Joint funding that shapes which safety infrastructure gets researched",
        "significance": "The programme combines philanthropy, a public research agency and an AI-industry participant around a research agenda. Application criteria and funding conditions can influence what researchers build without requiring an order to deploy it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Administrative and funding conditions",
            "text": "Schmidt Sciences hosts the application route while the partners jointly consider applications; individual contributions and voting arrangements are undisclosed. Applicants can opt out of a Google.org route and remain eligible for other support. That route adds specified open-code, licensing, data and no-patent conditions which do not automatically bind every award. Later Schmidt funding depends on progress and reporting. The call describes one-to-two-year research, excludes commercial product development and one privileged controller of all agents, and expected awards in autumn 2026; the ceiling is not a paid-grants total.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
                "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
              },
              {
                "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
                "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
                "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-caif",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-aria",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-deepmind",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-admin",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-google-route",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-google-conditions",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-agenda"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Google route: Apache2.0 code/inventions, CC-BY4.0 specified IP within3months, public-domain residual IP, no patents and open data subject to privacy law. Edition/dispute rights unknown. Does not bind every partner award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-google-conditions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
                "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google.org optional funding route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conditions prospective awards on openness and AI Principles",
            "sourceName": "Google.org optional funding route",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-aria"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
                "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ARIA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
            "sourceName": "ARIA",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Later years depend on progress/reporting; no guaranteed renewal or demonstrated clawback of paid funds. Call-specific duration1-2years governs over generic FAQ wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes progress-dependent annual funding",
            "sourceName": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Commercial product development and one privileged controller of all agents are excluded; research does not compel deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-agenda"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Agent infrastructure and admission-control research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "solicits research on coordination and admission mechanisms",
            "sourceName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "targetName": "Agent infrastructure and admission-control research",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Applicants may opt out while remaining eligible for Schmidt, ARIA and CAIF. No executed or paid grant established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-google-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google.org optional funding route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers optional differentiated funding route",
            "sourceName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "targetName": "Google.org optional funding route",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Portal/contact establishes administration, not exclusive award control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-admin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts application and administrative front door",
            "sourceName": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
            "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
      "label": "Schmidt Sciences",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "FAQ identifies Schmidt Sciences LLC, subsidiary of Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation. No parent EIN assigned. Administrative front door is not sole grantor proof.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
        "name": "Schmidt Sciences",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FAQ identifies Schmidt Sciences LLC, subsidiary of Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation. No parent EIN assigned. Administrative front door is not sole grantor proof.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FAQ identifies Schmidt Sciences LLC, subsidiary of Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation. No parent EIN assigned. Administrative front door is not sole grantor proof."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences general FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/faq/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Schmidt Sciences is a research-funding organisation whose FAQ identifies Schmidt Sciences LLC as a subsidiary of the Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation. It hosts the application and administrative route for Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World.",
        "structuralRole": "The administrative front door of a jointly supported research programme",
        "significance": "Applicants encounter Schmidt’s portal, requirements and reporting conditions. Administration and progress review shape practical obligations even when award decisions involve several supporting organisations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the programme discloses",
            "text": "The call names Schmidt Sciences, Cooperative AI Foundation, ARIA and DeepMind as supporting parties considering applications, without disclosing votes or individual contributions. Later years of Schmidt funding depend on progress and reporting; renewal is not guaranteed. The call-specific duration is one to two years. Hosting the portal does not establish sole legal grantor status or that every award carries the conditions of the separate optional Google.org route.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-admin",
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
            "sourceName": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Later years depend on progress/reporting; no guaranteed renewal or demonstrated clawback of paid funds. Call-specific duration1-2years governs over generic FAQ wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes progress-dependent annual funding",
            "sourceName": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Portal/contact establishes administration, not exclusive award control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-admin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts application and administrative front door",
            "sourceName": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Named among supporters over the years.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-schmidt"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
            "sourceName": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences general FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR funding update",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-aria",
      "label": "ARIA",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named joint supporting party. Separate contribution, award and allocation not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-aria",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-aria",
        "name": "ARIA",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named joint supporting party. Separate contribution, award and allocation not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named joint supporting party. Separate contribution, award and allocation not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named joint supporting party. Separate contribution, award and allocation not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-aria"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
                "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
                "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
            "sourceName": "ARIA",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass",
            "heading": "Generic policies kept separate",
            "text": "No separate ARIA announcement or award agreement assigning its contribution was acquired in this pass. ARIA's separate Scaling Trust programme amounts must not be treated as its share of this joint call. Nor does listing Google DeepMind as a joint supporting party establish that it supplies cash separately from Google.org.",
            "matched": [
              "ARIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "98753c21ae4cad404db01acc8d4e67b6cb40f314360bbcf265f83a2c5371cea2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass",
            "heading": "What the agenda can and cannot show",
            "text": "Schmidt explicitly credits DeepMind's Distributional AGI Safety work, ARIA's Scaling Trust thesis and CAIF's Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI report as inspirations. The agenda includes identity/authentication, admission controls, proof of agent/human credentials, platform vetting and revocation as research topics. It prioritizes strengthening existing infrastructure partly because incumbent protocols may become entrenched. These are concrete agenda choices relevant to the assurance inquiry.",
            "matched": [
              "ARIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ba025eab7fbdf398747a7b05f064f9f4c171cb4232c4bb200ebd82a0684ef3a0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure",
            "heading": "Reviewed follow-through integrated into case-r13",
            "text": "The next promising instruments are the Fathom-sponsored California verification bill, the newer CAIF/ARIA/industry multi-agent-safety fund, and the G7 minors declaration. These remain acquisition leads. Striving is active through the hourly task heartbeat and current-work.md.",
            "matched": [
              "ARIA"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9a47467123f74befede04b63d870b2bd321ac45f7c6bc4fc5edabcb094fa920c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-google-option",
      "label": "Google.org optional funding route",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Opt-in route carries openness/Google AI Principles conditions. Legal grantor and executed terms unknown; opting out preserves other-partner consideration.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding route"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-google-option",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-google-option",
        "name": "Google.org optional funding route",
        "role": "Funding route",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Opt-in route carries openness/Google AI Principles conditions. Legal grantor and executed terms unknown; opting out preserves other-partner consideration.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Opt-in route carries openness/Google AI Principles conditions. Legal grantor and executed terms unknown; opting out preserves other-partner consideration."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
            "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Opt-in route carries openness/Google AI Principles conditions. Legal grantor and executed terms unknown; opting out preserves other-partner consideration.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding route",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Google route: Apache2.0 code/inventions, CC-BY4.0 specified IP within3months, public-domain residual IP, no patents and open data subject to privacy law. Edition/dispute rights unknown. Does not bind every partner award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-google-conditions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
                "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conditions prospective awards on openness and AI Principles",
            "sourceName": "Google.org optional funding route",
            "targetName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Applicants may opt out while remaining eligible for Schmidt, ARIA and CAIF. No executed or paid grant established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-google-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers optional differentiated funding route",
            "sourceName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "targetName": "Google.org optional funding route",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
            "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-agent-infrastructure",
      "label": "Agent infrastructure and admission-control research",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Identity/authentication, admission and revocation are research topics. Call excludes one privileged controller of all agents; no compulsory operational identity requirement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research agenda"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-agent-infrastructure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-agent-infrastructure",
        "name": "Agent infrastructure and admission-control research",
        "role": "Research agenda",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Identity/authentication, admission and revocation are research topics. Call excludes one privileged controller of all agents; no compulsory operational identity requirement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Identity/authentication, admission and revocation are research topics. Call excludes one privileged controller of all agents; no compulsory operational identity requirement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "risk",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Identity/authentication, admission and revocation are research topics. Call excludes one privileged controller of all agents; no compulsory operational identity requirement.",
        "structuralRole": "Research agenda",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Commercial product development and one privileged controller of all agents are excluded; research does not compel deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fund-agenda"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "solicits research on coordination and admission mechanisms",
            "sourceName": "Scaling AI Safety for a Multi-Agent World",
            "targetName": "Agent infrastructure and admission-control research",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
            "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-old-mro",
      "label": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Historical sponsor sought recognition under an earlier model-review/certification scheme. No later appointment or surviving liability privilege inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Superseded policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-old-mro",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-old-mro",
        "name": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
        "role": "Superseded policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Historical sponsor sought recognition under an earlier model-review/certification scheme. No later appointment or surviving liability privilege inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical sponsor sought recognition under an earlier model-review/certification scheme. No later appointment or surviving liability privilege inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Historical sponsor sought recognition under an earlier model-review/certification scheme. No later appointment or surviving liability privilege inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Superseded policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Final audit may be relevant but not conclusive; neither affirmative defense nor rebuttable presumption survives. No causal attribution for each deletion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-version-change"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "earlier certification framework superseded in enrolled text",
            "sourceName": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-01 – 2026-09-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Judiciary pp1/9 report Fathom hoped to be an MRO and considered itself qualified. Historical aspiration, not designation, award or monopoly.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-prospective-mro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported seeking prospective recognized-operator role",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
            "date": "2025-04-29 – 2025-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-bsa",
      "label": "Business Software Alliance",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Opposition and prediction of practical litigation pressure reported in final Floor analysis; not an observed compulsory-audit outcome.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-bsa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-bsa",
        "name": "Business Software Alliance",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Opposition and prediction of practical litigation pressure reported in final Floor analysis; not an observed compulsory-audit outcome.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Opposition and prediction of practical litigation pressure reported in final Floor analysis; not an observed compulsory-audit outcome."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Opposition and prediction of practical litigation pressure reported in final Floor analysis; not an observed compulsory-audit outcome.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Floor pp6-7 report predicted indirect pressure alongside competence/alignment concerns; not evidence of actual refusal or legal compulsion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-bsa-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "objects that voluntary audits could become litigation expectations",
            "sourceName": "Business Software Alliance",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "2026-08-30 – 2026-08-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
      "label": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Age assurance encouraged consistently with law/minimal intrusion. No specified vendor, real-name system, universal access age or mandatory certification.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy statement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-g7-principles",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
        "name": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
        "role": "Policy statement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Age assurance encouraged consistently with law/minimal intrusion. No specified vendor, real-name system, universal access age or mandatory certification.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Age assurance encouraged consistently with law/minimal intrusion. No specified vendor, real-name system, universal access age or mandatory certification."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The G7 ministers' Common Set of Principles for a Safer and More Secure Digital Space for Minors was adopted on 29 May 2026. It encourages age assurance consistent with law and minimal intrusion, and was welcomed by G7 leaders in their 17 June call.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared political framework for children's online safety across national systems",
        "significance": "The principles create a reference point for national policy and later regulator guidance. Their significance lies in shared direction rather than a directly enforceable multinational rule: domestic law supplies compulsion, and the statement leaves important implementation choices to the relevant jurisdictions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Related instruments",
            "text": "The ministers' principles do not specify a vendor, real-name system, universal access age or mandatory certification. The leaders' June call expressly welcomes them. A separate G7 privacy-authorities statement later that month references the assurance commitments while qualifying their use with privacy limits. Its ISO reference does not make certification compulsory, and none of these instruments alone establishes a deployed cross-border age system.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              },
              {
                "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
              },
              {
                "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
                "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-ministers",
              "w9-assure-e-g7-welcome",
              "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy-reference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Separate regulator guidance qualifies use; ISO reference does not mandate certification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy-reference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
                "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly references ministerial assurance commitments",
            "sourceName": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
            "targetName": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "date": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Political agreement29May; domestic law supplies compulsion. Current PDF export17June.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-ministers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
                "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopt shared minors principles",
            "sourceName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "targetName": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Explicit instrument reference, not a new domestic law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-welcome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "welcomes preceding ministerial principles",
            "sourceName": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
            "targetName": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-g7-leaders",
      "label": "G7 heads of state and government",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Authors of separate17June call; distinct from digital ministers and privacy authorities.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-g7-leaders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-g7-leaders",
        "name": "G7 heads of state and government",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Authors of separate17June call; distinct from digital ministers and privacy authorities.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authors of separate17June call; distinct from digital ministers and privacy authorities."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The G7 heads of state and government issued a separate call on a safer digital space for minors on 17 June 2026. This leaders' instrument follows the digital ministers' principles and is distinct from both that ministerial agreement and the privacy authorities' later statement.",
        "structuralRole": "Leaders setting political direction and requesting ministerial follow-through",
        "significance": "The leaders' role raises a subject's political priority and gives ministers a timetable for continued work. It does not replace domestic law or make all G7 institutions one decision-maker. Following the separate instruments reveals who committed to what and which later action would demonstrate implementation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The June call",
            "text": "The call includes age assurance for conversational AI while preserving national frameworks; references to under-18s do not create a universal rule that every service is adults-only. It asks digital ministers to meet regularly and assess progress by the end of 2026. The retained record establishes the request and policy commitment, rather than a completed review or a shared enforcement mechanism.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-call",
              "w9-assure-e-g7-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy commitment preserves national frameworks; under18 not universal18-plus rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopt call including conversational-AI age assurance",
            "sourceName": "G7 heads of state and government",
            "targetName": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF3 asks for progress assessment by end2026; no completed review inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests regular meetings and year-end progress review",
            "sourceName": "G7 heads of state and government",
            "targetName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-g7-call",
      "label": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Requests conversational-AI assurance/default protections. Under18 defines beneficiaries, not a universal minimum access age; no enacted global gate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy statement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-g7-call",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-g7-call",
        "name": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
        "role": "Policy statement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Requests conversational-AI assurance/default protections. Under18 defines beneficiaries, not a universal minimum access age; no enacted global gate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Requests conversational-AI assurance/default protections. Under18 defines beneficiaries, not a universal minimum access age; no enacted global gate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Requests conversational-AI assurance/default protections. Under18 defines beneficiaries, not a universal minimum access age; no enacted global gate.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy statement",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy commitment preserves national frameworks; under18 not universal18-plus rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-call"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 heads of state and government",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopt call including conversational-AI age assurance",
            "sourceName": "G7 heads of state and government",
            "targetName": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Explicit instrument reference, not a new domestic law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-welcome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
                "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "welcomes preceding ministerial principles",
            "sourceName": "G7 leaders minors call —17June2026",
            "targetName": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-g7-dpas",
      "label": "G7 data-protection and privacy authorities",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Separate roundtable, not a unitary G7 regulator; guidance does not establish compliant implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-g7-dpas",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-g7-dpas",
        "name": "G7 data-protection and privacy authorities",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Separate roundtable, not a unitary G7 regulator; guidance does not establish compliant implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate roundtable, not a unitary G7 regulator; guidance does not establish compliant implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate roundtable, not a unitary G7 regulator; guidance does not establish compliant implementation.",
        "structuralRole": "Institution",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Opposes identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; not enforcement decision or verified safeguard.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
                "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopts contextual and privacy-preserving assurance guidance",
            "sourceName": "G7 data-protection and privacy authorities",
            "targetName": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
            "date": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-g7-privacy",
      "label": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Opposes indiscriminate use and identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; purpose/data limitations. Notes ISO27566 without required certification.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy statement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-g7-privacy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-g7-privacy",
        "name": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
        "role": "Policy statement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Opposes indiscriminate use and identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; purpose/data limitations. Notes ISO27566 without required certification.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Opposes indiscriminate use and identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; purpose/data limitations. Notes ISO27566 without required certification."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Opposes indiscriminate use and identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; purpose/data limitations. Notes ISO27566 without required certification.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy statement",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Opposes identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; not enforcement decision or verified safeguard.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
                "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 data-protection and privacy authorities",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopts contextual and privacy-preserving assurance guidance",
            "sourceName": "G7 data-protection and privacy authorities",
            "targetName": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
            "date": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Separate regulator guidance qualifies use; ISO reference does not mandate certification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy-reference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
                "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly references ministerial assurance commitments",
            "sourceName": "G7 privacy limits on age assurance",
            "targetName": "G7 minors principles — ministers",
            "date": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-5rights-premarket",
      "label": "5Rights premarket certification demand",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "17June demand goes beyond inspected G7 adopted texts; no operator specified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-5rights-premarket",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-5rights-premarket",
        "name": "5Rights premarket certification demand",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "17June demand goes beyond inspected G7 adopted texts; no operator specified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "17June demand goes beyond inspected G7 adopted texts; no operator specified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "17June demand goes beyond inspected G7 adopted texts; no operator specified.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Proposed access condition, not adopted duty or evidence of industry-written clauses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-premarket"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
                "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "5Rights Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "demands premarket certification beyond G7 outcome",
            "sourceName": "5Rights Foundation",
            "targetName": "5Rights premarket certification demand",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-unicef",
      "label": "UNICEF",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Reports advance evidence contribution; exact package and clause uptake not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-unicef",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-unicef",
        "name": "UNICEF",
        "role": "Institution",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Reports advance evidence contribution; exact package and clause uptake not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reports advance evidence contribution; exact package and clause uptake not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "rights",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reports advance evidence contribution; exact package and clause uptake not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Institution",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Original package, receipt, adopted wording and implementation plan not recovered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-g7-unicef"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
                "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports providing advance evidence",
            "sourceName": "UNICEF",
            "targetName": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers",
            "date": "Before meetings; reported1June2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate",
            "heading": "Attributable input and the demand that exceeds the adopted text",
            "text": "No named NGO appears in the operative G1/G2 texts. UNICEF's claimed evidence provision is stronger than shared vocabulary, but weaker than clause-level uptake. 5Rights' reaction supplies an explicit example of divergence between an advocate's desired control mechanism and the actual outcome. Do not create an adopted-certification or industry-authored-clause edge from either account.",
            "matched": [
              "UNICEF"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "826b0f1356efc082a690eb55a08dbb4e66b68b03959e9ed9cee97d4029a0193e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate",
            "heading": "High-value gap and stopping point",
            "text": "The decisive instrument is the implementation plan UNICEF calls agreed, together with any adopted country-specific rule or platform implementation notice giving it effect. The test is concrete: covered service; trigger; required evidence; decision-maker; discretion to refuse or override; legal source; privacy restrictions; appeal and enforcement. A copy of the plan, approval minutes and task assignments would reveal whether this remains coordinated encouragement or becomes a compulsory condition. This note does not infer that a plan must contain all those elements or that it has already been enacted.",
            "matched": [
              "UNICEF"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2ac1a2f095c30bb0ca6be17dc086c5a2391010ccc887b76aa1176d24afc3fe13"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "Who contributed, and who approved?",
            "text": "Page3 says the paper was collaboratively written using member insights. Page4 identifies ICMEC Australia as coalition leader and displays a historical member panel. Visual inspection confirms, among others, AiLECS Lab, University of Tasmania, UNICEF Australia, Australian Childhood Foundation, Bravehearts and the Grace Tame Foundation. These are publisher-presented member identities. They are not a task allocation, author list, sponsor ledger or publication-clearance record. I did not infer the undisplayed members, reconstruct a broad roster or import the January2026 participation rules into this 2024 document.",
            "matched": [
              "UNICEF"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "89b598763ef78242cc3b0c2fa3d0dea82702443dfc5ab24f4e652117aa8e65f3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-paris-simulation",
      "label": "Paris verification simulation —2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Organizer-reported findings about revocation, appeals and conflicting incentives; not actual control or capture.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-paris-simulation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-paris-simulation",
        "name": "Paris verification simulation —2026",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Organizer-reported findings about revocation, appeals and conflicting incentives; not actual control or capture.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Organizer-reported findings about revocation, appeals and conflicting incentives; not actual control or capture."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Organizer-reported findings about revocation, appeals and conflicting incentives; not actual control or capture.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Reported unresolved safeguards and differing participant assessments; not operational government arrangement or cover-up.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-paris"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
                "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes reported verification simulation findings",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Paris verification simulation —2026",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "Assurance markets: implementation and incentives"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-ashby-proposals",
      "label": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive proposals",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Optional verification could affect insurance/liability; child-rating and high-risk fraud-identity concepts remain proposals.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-ashby-proposals",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-ashby-proposals",
        "name": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive proposals",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Optional verification could affect insurance/liability; child-rating and high-risk fraud-identity concepts remain proposals.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Optional verification could affect insurance/liability; child-rating and high-risk fraud-identity concepts remain proposals."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Optional verification could affect insurance/liability; child-rating and high-risk fraud-identity concepts remain proposals.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No actual insurance schedule, procurement gate or single deployed identity system acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-fathom-ashby"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
                "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
                "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes verification and commercial-incentive proposals",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive proposals",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
            "title": "Assurance markets: implementation and incentives"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-carnegie",
      "label": "Carnegie UK",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Institutional author of Australian committee submission. Statutory review cites its earlier model work; no current funding or clause-clearance rights inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-carnegie",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-carnegie",
        "name": "Carnegie UK",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Institutional author of Australian committee submission. Statutory review cites its earlier model work; no current funding or clause-clearance rights inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Institutional author of Australian committee submission. Statutory review cites its earlier model work; no current funding or clause-clearance rights inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Carnegie UK, legally the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, operated a financed online-safety programme that developed and promoted systems-based regulation. Its work included legislative drafting, evidence and international advice, and it submitted to Australia's House Select Committee on Social Media and Online Safety in January 2022.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional home and resource base for an exportable regulatory model",
        "significance": "Carnegie supplied more than a name on a report: a programme, staff or specialist capacity, and institutional governance allowed a model to be developed and carried between policy forums. The later succession into a network shows how that expertise could continue after the original programme ended.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Resources, governance and succession",
            "text": "The trust's accounts distinguish restricted project resources from its permanent endowment. Its trustees set strategy and annual budgets, with management responsible for execution. Australia's review cites Carnegie's earlier model work. On 26 October 2023 Carnegie announced the programme's end and said Woods and Walsh would continue through the new Online Safety Act Network, supported by Reset; the 2023 accounts also report support for developing that network.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
                "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme",
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-board",
              "w10-duty-e-carnegie-review",
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recipient legal identity The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, ScottishSC012799/Irish20142957. Work includes bill/amendment drafting, evidence and international advice; restriction constrains purpose, not a disclosed donor clause veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates financed duty-model programme",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie UK",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report delegates execution to management; permanent endowment supplies independent capacity. This is recipient governance, not proof a named trustee decided a particular grant or clause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets strategy and agrees annual budgets",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
            "targetName": "Carnegie UK",
            "date": "2023 report; individual decision records not obtained"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Review section5.5/footnotes34-38 cites Carnegie2019model and2021 criticism.2022 Australian submission separately demonstrates an input route; no exclusive authorship of2026 clauses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-carnegie-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
                "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "earlier model work cited in review",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie UK",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "26October2023 transition says programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through new network; accounts support development. No complete asset/payroll transfer or ownership inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports support for programme succession",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie UK",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": "2023-10-26 – 2023-10-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Carnegie UK, legally the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, housed an online-safety programme that developed and promoted a systems-based duty model. Its work included legislative drafting and international advice, with ideas later cited in Australia's statutory review and carried forward through the Online Safety Network.",
          "structuralRole": "Providing the institutional home for an exportable duty model",
          "significance": "Carnegie explains part of the policy's history: sustained institutional resources allowed a legal model to be developed, tested in debate and carried between jurisdictions. The programme's succession shows how that expertise can continue after its original organizational home changes.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Carnegie UK is a charitable trust that provided an institutional base for online-safety policy work. Its programme developed and promoted a systems-based approach to platform responsibility: attention moves toward how a service's design and operation create risks, rather than treating every harmful item as an isolated event. The programme undertook legislative drafting, evidence submissions and international advice.",
            "Its accounts distinguish restricted project resources from the trust's permanent endowment. Trustees set strategy and annual budgets, while management executes the work. That structure matters because a policy model requires sustained time and expertise to develop. An established institution can support specialist work through repeated consultations, amendments and changes in the political timetable, keeping an argument available when a government decides to act.",
            "The Australian record provides a concrete route for the ideas to travel. Carnegie submitted to the House Select Committee on Social Media and Online Safety in January 2022. The later statutory review cited its 2019 model and subsequent criticism of content-specific duties. These references place the Australian debate in a longer history of policy development, with identifiable authors and an institutional programme behind it.",
            "In October 2023 Carnegie announced the end of its online-safety programme and said Lorna Woods and Maeve Walsh would continue through a new network supported by Reset. Its accounts also recorded support for developing that network. The important continuity is expertise and policy work that survived a change of organizational home. Carnegie is therefore a significant origin point in the duty-of-care branch of the map, even though its own programme had ended before the current Australian proposal."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
              "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
              "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
              "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
              "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
              "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-woods",
      "label": "Lorna Woods",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Model originator credited by statutory review, network principal adviser in2024 and joint article author. No inferred personal grant or control right.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-woods",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-woods",
        "name": "Lorna Woods",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Model originator credited by statutory review, network principal adviser in2024 and joint article author. No inferred personal grant or control right.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Model originator credited by statutory review, network principal adviser in2024 and joint article author. No inferred personal grant or control right."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lorna Woods is a legal-policy contributor whom Australia's published statutory review credits, alongside William Perrin, with the digital duty-of-care conception. The Online Safety Act Network's June 2024 submission identifies her as its principal adviser, and she authored or co-authored several retained policy interventions.",
        "structuralRole": "Individual carrier of the duty model across jurisdictions and implementation debates",
        "significance": "Woods connects an attributed policy idea with the practical interpretation of regulatory duties. Her Australian co-authorship with Rys Farthing and UK consultation work show how expertise travels through named writing and advisory roles. This is a more specific mechanism than inferring influence from organizational proximity.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A documented sequence of contributions",
            "text": "The Australian review cites the earlier model work associated with Woods and Perrin. On 22 April 2024 Woods and Farthing argued for a singular Australian duty of care. Her February 2024 commentary addressed the evidential approach to illegal-content judgments, while the July children's consultation response names Woods and Maeve Walsh as authors. These records establish intellectual and advisory contributions at their dates, without establishing control over Ofcom decisions or final Australian clauses.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-woods-review",
              "w10-duty-e-woods-network",
              "w10-duty-e-woods-article",
              "w13-disp-e-woods-inference",
              "w13-disp-e-woods-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named article15February2024 under Burden of Proof in a Civil Regime; intellectual contribution, not regulatory appointment or sole authorship of network response.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-woods-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly argued contextual civil approach",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Review attributes conception to Woods and Perrin. This is a documented attribution, not proof of every historical origin or current approval rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-woods-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited with duty-of-care conception",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-woods-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as co-author",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "date": "July2024 response"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Shared authored output with Farthing; not evidence of a formal OSANetwork-Reset agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-woods-article"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
            "date": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Role in June2024 submission; not a legal-control or current individual-veto finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-woods-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "identified as principal adviser",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": "June2024 submission; effective tenure unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions",
            "heading": "Authority and chronology boundaries for integration",
            "text": "The network is a submitter and advocate in these records. Woods and Walsh are named authors of the July response, not thereby statutory committee members or holders of regulatory approval rights. Targeted Ofcom searches did not establish a formal appointment for either; an unrelated result names Siobhan Walsh , not Maeve Walsh. This pass makes no claim that no formal role exists anywhere.",
            "matched": [
              "Woods"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "65370ddeec931a16483955a63dd229dedd4689e67abdb43f1fe5e104f4e68ff6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "Succession and Reset support",
            "text": "Carnegie's26October2023 transition statement says its programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through the new Online Safety Act Network, supported by former partner Reset. The2023 report independently says Carnegie supported development of the new network. This establishes deliberate succession of expertise and convening work after enactment, not ownership of the network or transfer of every employee/asset.",
            "matched": [
              "Woods"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fe9456cb4c3da9b90e571a914523e681b12c1f5704f7082b8c4d7d4481f21316"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "An identifiable financed international output",
            "text": "Carnegie's22November2021 announcement credits Frontier Technology, a Minderoo Foundation initiative, for financial support of its advice to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues. Woods/Perrin carried the systems/risk approach into that advice. This is attributable financial support for a named international output. It is not evidence the UN adopted all its recommendations, or that Minderoo dictated them. Amount and agreement remain absent; do not count this as a new additional grant outside the accounts' project funding.",
            "matched": [
              "Woods"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a488fbec3d7e8afbae12ef6223d2a0923f7229d2730bcd73374fa625745a4c56"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-perrin",
      "label": "William Perrin",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Statutory review credits duty-of-care conception with Woods; no financing or individual drafting approval established in this wave.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-perrin",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-perrin",
        "name": "William Perrin",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statutory review credits duty-of-care conception with Woods; no financing or individual drafting approval established in this wave.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statutory review credits duty-of-care conception with Woods; no financing or individual drafting approval established in this wave."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "William Perrin is credited alongside Lorna Woods in Australia's published Online Safety Act review for the conception of a digital duty of care. Carnegie UK's 2023 report also lists him as a trustee and member of its Audit and Risk Committee.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy-model contributor with a documented institutional governance role",
        "significance": "Perrin links the intellectual development of the duty model with the governance of an institution that supported it. The distinction between collective trustee authority and individual authorship is useful here: the records show both roles, but do not turn either into proof that he personally approved a particular clause or expenditure.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two kinds of responsibility",
            "text": "The review's section on the overarching duty attributes the conception to Woods and Perrin. Separately, Carnegie's 2023 accounts identify the trustee body's responsibility for strategy and budgets, with implementation delegated to management. Perrin's committee membership places him within that governance structure; the public roster does not disclose his vote on a specific programme decision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-perrin-review",
              "w11-fund-e-perrin-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2023 report roster establishes role. Does not establish how Perrin voted, personal payments or individual publication approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-perrin-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed as trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member",
            "sourceName": "William Perrin",
            "targetName": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
            "date": "2023 report; effective tenure unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Review names Perrin alongside Woods. No new money, private direction or clause clearance established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-perrin-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited with duty-of-care conception",
            "sourceName": "William Perrin",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission",
            "heading": "Implication and next records",
            "text": "Prior local kidron-money.md records an Indigo grant to5Rights and William Perrin's trustee/grant-governance role; that is a useful older money lead, not refreshed here. Indigo's current biography returned a redirect page. No new financial edge should rely on that failed refresh. The most discriminating remaining records are the review's drafting correspondence and submission-response matrix, contemporary consultation invitations/version logs, and the grant agreements funding the relevant Australian advocacy work. Public statements alone do not resolve approval rights or earmarking.",
            "matched": [
              "William Perrin",
              "Perrin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "53a9ddf115094232acb14d89f56905cc4431972409c27a5094addefc0ff70751"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "Carnegie UK: recipient identity and restricted purpose",
            "text": "Carnegie's2023 report separately identifies its endowment and its own governing board as resources and decision-makers. Perrin was a trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member in that report. The trustees set strategy/budgets, with execution delegated to management. A donor's restricted purpose constrains permissible expenditure; the published accounts do not reveal a donor veto over conclusions, ministerial appointments, draft wording or publication.",
            "matched": [
              "Perrin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "56f42cf98b8e30f4ad45e3acd433ccb4f420b18cf7041113eda4e7abadfacfa9"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "An identifiable financed international output",
            "text": "Carnegie's22November2021 announcement credits Frontier Technology, a Minderoo Foundation initiative, for financial support of its advice to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues. Woods/Perrin carried the systems/risk approach into that advice. This is attributable financial support for a named international output. It is not evidence the UN adopted all its recommendations, or that Minderoo dictated them. Amount and agreement remain absent; do not count this as a new additional grant outside the accounts' project funding.",
            "matched": [
              "Perrin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a488fbec3d7e8afbae12ef6223d2a0923f7229d2730bcd73374fa625745a4c56"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-network",
      "label": "Online Safety Network",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Same network previously named Online Safety Act Network; renamed1September2026.2024 government-hosted submission and advisory role at their dates.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-network",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-network",
        "name": "Online Safety Network",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Same network previously named Online Safety Act Network; renamed1September2026.2024 government-hosted submission and advisory role at their dates.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Same network previously named Online Safety Act Network; renamed1September2026.2024 government-hosted submission and advisory role at their dates."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network: new vision, new name —1September2026",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/the-online-safety-network-new-vision-new-name/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Online Safety Network is the policy network formerly called the Online Safety Act Network; it announced its new name on 1 September 2026. It carries expertise and convening work from Carnegie UK's online-safety programme into regulatory implementation and international policy discussion.",
        "structuralRole": "Continuing policy network linking UK model development, consultation and Australian reform",
        "significance": "The network connects stages that often appear separately: developing a model, organizing expert argument, responding to a regulator and advising another jurisdiction. Its website's Reset-operated infrastructure and its documented consultation activity make operational support and substantive policy input separately visible.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Succession and activity",
            "text": "Carnegie's October 2023 transition statement said Woods and Walsh would continue through the new network with Reset support. In June 2024 its Australian review submission advocated systems-focused duties and alignment with UK and EU approaches. Its UK submissions addressed illegal harms and children's safety. Ofcom later named the network among civil-society contributors to feedback on age assumptions. The privacy notice describes an informal network without formal membership and identifies Reset as operator of its website, newsletter and shared inbox.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network: new vision, new name —1September2026",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/the-online-safety-network-new-vision-new-name/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-network",
              "w11-fund-e-reset-network",
              "w10-duty-e-network-review",
              "w13-disp-e-network-feb",
              "w13-disp-e-network-july",
              "w13-disp-e-osan-credited-feedback",
              "w12-gov-e-reset-operates-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government-hosted submission68 advocates Australian UK/EU alignment and risk/design duties. Publication confirms submitted argument; full adoption not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-network-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submits systems-focused policy recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "June2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Cover names Woods/Walsh;July2024 document date. Issue8 is differentiated design/assurance advocacy, not uncomplicated universal identification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-network-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published named children-consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "date": "July2024 internal document date"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Internal date February2024; consultation openingNovember2023 and later listing date do not date the response. Exact day not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-network-feb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted identified illegal-harms consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "date": "February2024 internal document date"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Role in June2024 submission; not a legal-control or current individual-veto finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-woods-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lorna Woods",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "identified as principal adviser",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": "June2024 submission; effective tenure unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Explicit Reset operational role and shared systems/records. Informal network has no formal membership; notice federation is not a merger or proof UK company alone contracts for all costs. Tor/VPN advice and limited technical-data retention are stated policies, not verified practice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-reset-operates-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "notice identifies operator of website, newsletter and shared inbox",
            "sourceName": "Reset",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SLSC25th Report23 records Ofcom collective attribution including OSAN and denies preferential weighting. Exact proposed clause not identified;July inspected section lacks exact formulation. Report24 records dissatisfaction;26 declines adjudication.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-osan-credited-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
              },
              {
                "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Children risk-assessment age assumptions",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Ofcom credits network among contributing civil-society feedback",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "Children risk-assessment age assumptions",
            "date": "Clarification24April2025; attribution published15May2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Carnegie identifies former partner Reset as supporting new network. Historical brand attribution only; exact contracting entity, amount, host and present2026 funding unknown. No automatic merge with Australian Reset.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "identified as supporter in dated transition account",
            "sourceName": "Reset",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": "26October2023 statement; support period not obtained"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "26October2023 transition says programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through new network; accounts support development. No complete asset/payroll transfer or ownership inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-network"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports support for programme succession",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie UK",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Network",
            "date": "2023-10-26 – 2023-10-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Observed9September2026. Bounded primary-filing review of company14982650, distinct from the informal Online Safety Network and from other Reset legal entities. The May2025 constitution reveals a director-member structure and an explicit cross-entity conflict provision. It does not reconcile the current PSC categories or establish donor control of policy outputs.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Safety Network"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b34d034bb47b72291070ec4a729fa6855e228f1e95ef68c653fc0ba797490083"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network: new vision, new name —1September2026",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/the-online-safety-network-new-vision-new-name/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "label": "Reset.Tech Australia",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An Australian digital-policy organisation advocating changes to how platforms are governed, including transparency and access for researchers.",
      "aliases": [
        "Reset Australia",
        "Reset Tech",
        "Duty of Care"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Digital-policy advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "name": "Reset.Tech Australia",
        "role": "Digital-policy advocacy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An Australian digital-policy organisation advocating changes to how platforms are governed, including transparency and access for researchers.",
        "why": "Its submissions let us follow a policy request into an official review and compare it with the later draft. That is a traceable channel of influence.",
        "about": [
          "Reset requested vetted access for both academic and third-sector researchers. The September 2026 draft instead specifies employment by an Australian university. This narrowing shows why an organisation’s preferred policy and a government’s chosen wording must be read separately."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Reset Australia",
          "Reset Tech",
          "Duty of Care"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 16
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An Australian digital-policy organisation advocating changes to how platforms are governed, including transparency and access for researchers.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy advocacy for changing platform responsibilities",
        "significance": "Reset.Tech Australia is a contributor to the debate over platform duties and the Australian duty-of-care proposal. Its submissions, collaborations and public campaigning help show how an advocacy position enters the policy process.",
        "background": [
          "Reset requested vetted access for both academic and third-sector researchers. The September 2026 draft instead specifies employment by an Australian university. This narrowing shows why an organisation’s preferred policy and a government’s chosen wording must be read separately."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Schedule1 names Reset Tech Australia Limited among defined companies. Article17 provides conflict-participation exceptions, with other-director exclusion and non-exempt benefit rules. Definition is not parent ownership or proof of an exercised conflicted vote. Australian organization node reused at its named legal-recipient scope; no global merger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-australia-group"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly lists Australian entity within defined Group Company category",
            "sourceName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$40,000 Signature Grant, dis/misinformation round. Supports research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry including OSA review, not particular2026 clauses. Currency code, exact award/payment date and cash receipt absent. Financial details: value: 40,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-reset"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records2024 grant for transparency advocacy",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 ScheduleA names Reset Tech Australia Limited US$87,600. Accrual reporting, not cash receipt; no demonstrated instalment reconciliation withUS$219,000 award. Unnamed ScheduleF row not assigned. No merge with global Reset. Financial details: value: 87,600; currency: USD; kind: reported monetary support (accrual); period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-isf-annual-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Society Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "annual return reports monetary support to named legal recipient",
            "sourceName": "Internet Society Foundation",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed6-7/PDF9 five-pillar table covers existing harms, scams, electoral/publicsecurity, rights, publichealth andenvironmental risks; comparesEU/UK/Canadian approaches. Moment-specific contribution to debate, not a sole WEF derivation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-model-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes broader risk model with named international comparators",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "date": "April2024 report; exact publication day unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recommendations include considering a duty for misinformation/disinformation, EU-style risk assessment and researcher access. Not a commission of the whole2026 bill or evidence of adoption; experiments not independently audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-functioning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes research with duty and assessment recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "date": "May2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-reset"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
            "sourceName": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Opening summary proposes Australian risk assessments, annual reports, audits, portals and researcher access across safety/misinformation frameworks. Model transmission is explicit; government uptake not established here.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-transparency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes comparison proposing EU and UK mechanisms",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
            "date": "June2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Funded purpose names policy development around misinformation bill/OSA review. No allocation to every Reset activity or proof government adopted conclusions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset transparency-advocacy grant purpose",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named grantee for transparency-advocacy purpose",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset transparency-advocacy grant purpose",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Reset.Tech Australia develops and promotes proposals for changing the responsibilities of digital platforms. Its submissions argue for risk assessment, transparency, independent scrutiny and researcher access, explicitly drawing on overseas models. Australia's statutory review quoted its criticism of content-specific duties.",
          "structuralRole": "Importing and adapting systems-based platform regulation for Australia",
          "significance": "Reset is a significant policy producer in the Australian duty-of-care debate. Its work supplies concrete models and arguments that can enter official reviews, while grants and partnerships help sustain the research and advocacy behind those proposals.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Reset.Tech Australia is an advocacy and research organization focused on the responsibilities of digital platforms. Its proposals address how services are designed and governed, including risk assessments, transparency reporting, audits and access for researchers. It explicitly compares approaches in the European Union, the United Kingdom and Canada, making the movement of policy ideas across borders part of its own published programme.",
            "Its contribution to Australia's duty-of-care debate is visible in the official record. The published statutory review quoted Reset's argument that duties focused on particular content categories were inadequate. Reset's broader five-pillar model included risks involving scams, elections, public security, rights, public health and the environment. The Human Rights Law Centre subsequently attributed that model to Reset in its own submission, giving the proposal another institutional route into the debate.",
            "This work has identifiable support. A 2024 Mannifera award listed $40,000 for transparency research and advocacy entering policy processes, including the Online Safety Act review. Other disclosures identify support to the Australian legal recipient and funded collaboration with the Human Rights Law Centre and Digital Rights Watch. Reset also reported convening academic and civil-society experts in March 2024. Resources, research production and coalition activity appear together here.",
            "The September 2026 exposure draft shows that government decisions can narrow an advocate's request. Reset sought researcher access that included third-sector organizations; the draft examined here specifies employment at an Australian university and prospective approval conditions. Reset's importance lies in supplying an organized case for systemic regulation and keeping it before policymakers. The resulting law, if adopted, will reflect public choices about which parts of that case acquire enforceable force."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
              "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
              "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
              "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
              "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
            },
            {
              "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
              "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-farthing",
      "label": "Rys Farthing",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Joint article author identified with Reset Australia; coauthorship does not prove organization-wide control or commissioning.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-farthing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-farthing",
        "name": "Rys Farthing",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Joint article author identified with Reset Australia; coauthorship does not prove organization-wide control or commissioning.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Joint article author identified with Reset Australia; coauthorship does not prove organization-wide control or commissioning."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rys Farthing is the Reset.Tech Australia-affiliated co-author, with Lorna Woods, of a 22 April 2024 article advocating a singular duty of care in Australia's Online Safety Act. The retained record identifies an authored policy intervention and the organizational affiliation attached to it.",
        "structuralRole": "Australian co-author connecting local advocacy with the UK duty-model tradition",
        "significance": "The collaboration places a shared argument in the public policy record before the statutory review's publication. It gives readers a concrete route for following the exchange of ideas between Australian advocacy and a contributor credited with developing the duty model.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The attributable output",
            "text": "The article, titled The dangers of pluralisation, argues for a singular duty rather than multiple separate duties. Its byline establishes Farthing's Reset affiliation at publication. It does not disclose an article-specific commission, payment or organization-wide agreement between Reset and the Online Safety Act Network.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-farthing-reset",
              "w10-duty-e-farthing-article"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organization-level funding disclosure does not establish this article commissioning or Woods personal funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-farthing-article"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
            "sourceName": "Rys Farthing",
            "targetName": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
            "date": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Affiliation associated with22April2024 joint article; no undisclosed financing or control inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-farthing-reset"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "identified with Australian organization in byline",
            "sourceName": "Rys Farthing",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": "22April2024 article; tenure unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-joint-output",
      "label": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "22April2024 joint public argument. Demonstrates a shared authored output, not formal inter-organizational agreement or adopted clause.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-joint-output",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-joint-output",
        "name": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "22April2024 joint public argument. Demonstrates a shared authored output, not formal inter-organizational agreement or adopted clause.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "22April2024 joint public argument. Demonstrates a shared authored output, not formal inter-organizational agreement or adopted clause."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "22April2024 joint public argument. Demonstrates a shared authored output, not formal inter-organizational agreement or adopted clause.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organization-level funding disclosure does not establish this article commissioning or Woods personal funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-farthing-article"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rys Farthing",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
            "sourceName": "Rys Farthing",
            "targetName": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
            "date": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Shared authored output with Farthing; not evidence of a formal OSANetwork-Reset agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-woods-article"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
                "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lorna Woods",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "A singular Australian duty: Woods/Farthing article",
            "date": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Section5.5 credits Woods/Perrin, cites Carnegie model work and directly quotes Reset submission70 while recommending an overarching duty. Recipient-side acknowledgement; no exclusive drafting attribution. Initially deliveredOctober2024, then revised beforeFebruary2025 publication; available text is not assumed identical to initial delivery. FOI reports departmental acceptance brief clearance, not signed ministerial acceptance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-review2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "name": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Section5.5 credits Woods/Perrin, cites Carnegie model work and directly quotes Reset submission70 while recommending an overarching duty. Recipient-side acknowledgement; no exclusive drafting attribution. Initially deliveredOctober2024, then revised beforeFebruary2025 publication; available text is not assumed identical to initial delivery. FOI reports departmental acceptance brief clearance, not signed ministerial acceptance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Section5.5 credits Woods/Perrin, cites Carnegie model work and directly quotes Reset submission70 while recommending an overarching duty. Recipient-side acknowledgement; no exclusive drafting attribution. Initially deliveredOctober2024, then revised beforeFebruary2025 publication; available text is not assumed identical to initial delivery. FOI reports departmental acceptance brief clearance, not signed ministerial acceptance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 21
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The updated statutory review of Australia's Online Safety Act, published in February 2025, is the independent review that recommended an overarching digital duty of care and other changes. The review was initially delivered in October 2024 and revised before publication, so the published text represents a later version.",
        "structuralRole": "Official synthesis connecting submitted policy ideas with government reform choices",
        "significance": "The review is a particularly strong record of policy transmission because it explicitly credits people and quotes submissions. It also creates a numbered agenda against which government support, qualification and refusal can be checked. Its status as an independent recommendation remains distinct from both ministerial commitment and enacted powers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Intellectual lineage and version history",
            "text": "Section 5.5 credits Lorna Woods and William Perrin with the duty-of-care conception, cites Carnegie's model work and quotes Reset submission 70 on the limits of content-specific duties. The minister's November 2024 commitment referred to the received review. Released departmental records document subsequent revision; their recommendation totals are not fully reconciled. The April 2026 government response and September exposure draft therefore require comparison with the published version, rather than an assumption that every October recommendation or phrase was unchanged.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
              },
              {
                "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
                "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-carnegie-review",
              "w10-duty-e-woods-review",
              "w10-duty-e-perrin-review",
              "w10-duty-e-reset-review",
              "w13-disp-e-commitment-review",
              "w14-tax-e-version-callouts",
              "w10-duty-e-review-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document1/AttachmentC: request1November after31October delivery, brief cleared8November. Five additions/68 total, four said already in text; later public response says67. Intro daily duty-action penalty differs from itemg/newrec35 $10m company removal-notice maximum. No arithmetic-derived original total or identified deletion; no settled attachment date or signed minister acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-version-callouts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FOI review-version record — inconsistencies retained",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records post-delivery changes with conflicting summaries",
            "sourceName": "FOI review-version record — inconsistencies retained",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Speech13November2024 names recently received review and international alignment; release14November follows. Stable review node represents later published updated text, not identity of all wording withOctober delivery. No NGO/funder decision attribution in announcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-commitment-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
              },
              {
                "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government duty-of-care commitment —November2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ministerial announcement expressly grounds direction in received review",
            "sourceName": "Government duty-of-care commitment —November2024",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "Speech13November2024;release14November2024;review published4February2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published updated section10.10/printed147 andFOIAttachmentC PDF7 directly matchrec45. Possible enforcement,newsbargaining,ombuds andcost purposes; difficulties acknowledged. Citation toNicholls is not a named commission/drafter. No arithmetic matching from68/67 counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-review-licence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends considering licensing as operation condition",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Responsep5 rejects automatic highest tier above10% population coverage; p4 favors proportionate risk wherever present. Ten percent measures population coverage, not a penalty formula. Not an individually addressed NGO rejection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec7"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government review response —April2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "does not support recommendation7: automatic highest tier",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published updated section11.2/printed153-154 distinguishes identifying particular users from collecting information on account opening. Privacy/security constraints acknowledged; specific underlying drafter not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-review-phone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes phone-at-opening, confidentiality and preservation",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed56 adjoining discussion: financial,societal,misinformation harms compatible with duty model but already elsewhere; reform substantial. Not a named WEF rejection or blanket exemption from any Australian regulation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-review-defers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Broader harm-regime consolidation deferred",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defers broader consolidation to other regimes or future review",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Broader harm-regime consolidation deferred",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Responsep5 support in principle; p4 describes government-made rules with parliamentary scrutiny instead of eSafety mandatory codes. Qualified implementation choice, not total rejection or exact NGO clause adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec9"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government review response —April2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation9 in principle with altered rule-maker",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published updated reviewp56, not automatically identical text toOctober delivery. Prior source§5.5 separately cites Reset submission70; HRLC endorsement is not an intervening delivery step.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-review-rec5"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes harm families in recommendation5",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
            "title": "Digital Duty of Care: draft access and missing-text claims"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "label": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Published8September2026. Creates proposed ministerial/Commissioner discretion and provider duties if enacted. Operative rules and certain simplified outlines remain incomplete.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed legislation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-draft2026",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "name": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
        "role": "Proposed legislation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published8September2026. Creates proposed ministerial/Commissioner discretion and provider duties if enacted. Operative rules and certain simplified outlines remain incomplete.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published8September2026. Creates proposed ministerial/Commissioner discretion and provider duties if enacted. Operative rules and certain simplified outlines remain incomplete."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published8September2026. Creates proposed ministerial/Commissioner discretion and provider duties if enacted. Operative rules and certain simplified outlines remain incomplete.",
        "structuralRole": "A proposed change to platforms’ legal responsibilities",
        "significance": "The digital duty-of-care proposal is a prospective legal instrument, not an organisation. It matters because changing the duties owed by a platform can alter its design, risk assessment and user-access decisions. Draft provisions, consultation and enactment remain different stages.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary control becomes a live negotiation",
            "text": "On 13 September2026, Anika Wells offered to negotiate wording that would give Parliament a role in deciding new duty-of-care harm categories, while retaining an urgent-response mechanism. She was answering David Speers on ABC Insiders. This is a public negotiating position: the revised or introduced bill must establish whether and how the proposed ministerial power changes.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anika Wells: ABC Insiders interview, 13 September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-wells-negotiation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-duty-care-parliament-negotiation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "25E/26A: named-category absence is insufficient to exhaust assessment scope. Context with existing25Hprivacy/practicability and26(7)private-consenting-adult duty exception; no blanket exclusion of lawful adult speech or all other powers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-draft-assessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Draft foreseeable, combined and non-user risks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would assess foreseeable risks including combined and non-user harms",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Draft foreseeable, combined and non-user risks",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "8September2026 public PDF/DOCX release coexists with targeted categories. Does not resolve whether companies received earlier or fuller drafts. Public simplified outlines incomplete; no established redaction or byte-equivalence audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-public-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announces targeted consultation alongside public release",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "date": "2026-09-08 – 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections25A-G and27B: exemptions, specified additions and empowerment tools. Advice requirements vary;27B does not list every power. Thresholds constrain general serious-harm additions. Future instruments not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-minister"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would delegate specified scope and harm-category rules",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "25B-D distinguish serious harm, additional child protection andunder16 social-media features. No generic misinformation/democracy label named; not an assurance none could intersect listed conduct or future additions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-draft-initial"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies initial harm and child/feature categories",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section26(7) PDF36: does not require action regarding lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Does not prohibit intervention under every other power; adult-AI coverage unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-adult"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Private consenting-adult limit on the duty",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits what duty requires for private adult communications",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Private consenting-adult limit on the duty",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections26A and198-205 specify assessments/information, building on existing authority. New general compliance limb excludes Part4A age-ban duties. No universal identity-collection mandate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-esafety"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would extend assessment and compliance powers",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section205B: Australian-university employment, approval under legislative rules, ethics and prescribed public-interest research. Not NGO/company access merely by invitation or affiliation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would restrict eligibility to approved university researchers",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections25H,26-26A PDF35-38: risk assessment, design and effective measures; proportionality rather than zero-harm guarantee. Proposed, not enacted or implemented.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Covered online-service providers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would impose reasonably practicable safe-environment duty",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anika Wells: ABC Insiders interview, 13 September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
            "title": "Digital Duty of Care: draft access and missing-text claims"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "label": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Role that would make specified legislative instruments under this draft; distinct from claims about current individual decisions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-minister-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "name": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Role that would make specified legislative instruments under this draft; distinct from claims about current individual decisions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Role that would make specified legislative instruments under this draft; distinct from claims about current individual decisions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject is the Australian communications minister's proposed statutory role under the September 2026 digital-duty-of-care exposure draft. It represents an office and its delegated rule-making powers, rather than the biography or personal decisions of the current officeholder.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed rule-maker for coverage, harm categories and researcher access",
        "significance": "A duty stated in legislation still needs choices about who is covered, what additional risks count and who may inspect provider data. Placing those choices in ministerial instruments makes subsequent rules consequential. The precise statutory tests and advice requirements are the way to assess the reach of that discretion.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Delegations in the draft",
            "text": "The exposure draft would let the minister specify exemptions and some user-empowerment requirements and establish the research-access scheme. Harm additions under sections 25C and 25D require seeking and considering eSafety advice, but their tests differ: the general category uses serious harm, while the child category concerns potential harm to children. The feature power in section 25G has no express serious-harm threshold in that section. The public draft accompanied targeted consultation on 8 September 2026.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
              },
              {
                "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-minister",
              "w10-duty-e-minister-provider",
              "w10-duty-e-minister-research",
              "w14-tax-e-minister-additions",
              "w10-duty-e-public-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary control becomes a live negotiation",
            "text": "On 13 September2026, Anika Wells offered to negotiate wording that would give Parliament a role in deciding new duty-of-care harm categories, while retaining an urgent-response mechanism. She was answering David Speers on ABC Insiders. This is a public negotiating position: the revised or introduced bill must establish whether and how the proposed ministerial power changes.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anika Wells: ABC Insiders interview, 13 September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-wells-negotiation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "australia-duty-care-parliament-negotiation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "25C(2),25D(2),27B require seeking/considering eSafety advice and serious-harm or child-harm potential respectively. Child test does not expressly require seriousness;25G feature power has no express serious-harm threshold in that section. Existing general delegation edges retained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-minister-additions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would add harm or feature categories under differing tests",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "8September2026 public PDF/DOCX release coexists with targeted categories. Does not resolve whether companies received earlier or fuller drafts. Public simplified outlines incomplete; no established redaction or byte-equivalence audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-public-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announces targeted consultation alongside public release",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "date": "2026-09-08 – 2026-09-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections205B-F/240: delegated approval, conditions, fees and revocation; conflict/privacy/security/confidentiality safeguards await rules. Commissioner approvals if rules provide. No completed scheme or awarded data right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-minister-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would establish access and approval scheme through rules",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections25A-G and27B: exemptions, specified additions and empowerment tools. Advice requirements vary;27B does not list every power. Thresholds constrain general serious-harm additions. Future instruments not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-minister"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would delegate specified scope and harm-category rules",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections25A,25B and26(4)-(6). Not current individual orders, automatic small-business exemption or a fixed adult opt-out interface.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-minister-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Covered online-service providers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would specify exemptions and some user-empowerment requirements",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anika Wells: ABC Insiders interview, 13 September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
            "title": "Digital Duty of Care: draft access and missing-text claims"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-provider-role",
      "label": "Covered online-service providers",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Generic covered class and day-to-day controllers. Proportionate safe-environment duties proposed; no named implementation or universal identity collection established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-provider-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-provider-role",
        "name": "Covered online-service providers",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Generic covered class and day-to-day controllers. Proportionate safe-environment duties proposed; no named implementation or universal identity collection established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Generic covered class and day-to-day controllers. Proportionate safe-environment duties proposed; no named implementation or universal identity collection established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Covered online-service providers are the regulated class contemplated by Australia's September 2026 digital-duty-of-care exposure draft. They would remain the day-to-day operators of their services while taking reasonably practicable steps to provide a safe online environment through assessment, design and effective risk-reduction measures.",
        "structuralRole": "Operators that would implement the proposed duty and respond to oversight",
        "significance": "The proposal places responsibility where service design and operation occur. Its practical effect would depend on provider assessments, ministerial rules and eSafety enforcement working together, rather than on a promise that no harm ever occurs. Research access would add another route for examining whether those systems work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Responsibilities and enforcement",
            "text": "Proposed sections 25H and 26–26A describe proportionate duties. The minister could specify exemptions and some user-empowerment requirements. Under section 26D, a reasonable belief in past or present noncompliance could lead eSafety to give written directions aimed at preventing future failures. Separate civil-penalty and infringement processes are contemplated. The draft also envisages scheme-governed research access, including tightly constrained test accounts; it does not establish a universal identity-collection requirement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-provider",
              "w10-duty-e-minister-provider",
              "w10-duty-e-esafety-provider",
              "w10-duty-e-research-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Sections205B-L: access depends on future rules and eligibility; fictitious accounts limited to authorized research, with interaction constraints and criminal-material exclusions. No actual transfer acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-research-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "could obtain scheme-governed research access and test accounts",
            "sourceName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section26D PDF38-39: reasonable belief of past/present noncompliance triggers written future-prevention directions. Not unlimited orders. Civil penalties and infringement notices have distinct processes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-esafety-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would issue compliance directions on reasonable belief",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections25H,26-26A PDF35-38: risk assessment, design and effective measures; proportionality rather than zero-harm guarantee. Proposed, not enacted or implemented.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would impose reasonably practicable safe-environment duty",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections25A,25B and26(4)-(6). Not current individual orders, automatic small-business exemption or a fixed adult opt-out interface.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-minister-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would specify exemptions and some user-empowerment requirements",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-private-adult-limit",
      "label": "Private consenting-adult limit on the duty",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Section26(7): duty does not require action concerning lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Not blanket immunity; public viewing and adult-AI application differ or remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed safeguard"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-private-adult-limit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-private-adult-limit",
        "name": "Private consenting-adult limit on the duty",
        "role": "Proposed safeguard",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Section26(7): duty does not require action concerning lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Not blanket immunity; public viewing and adult-AI application differ or remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Section26(7): duty does not require action concerning lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Not blanket immunity; public viewing and adult-AI application differ or remain unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Section26(7): duty does not require action concerning lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Not blanket immunity; public viewing and adult-AI application differ or remain unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed safeguard",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section26(7) PDF36: does not require action regarding lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Does not prohibit intervention under every other power; adult-AI coverage unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-adult"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits what duty requires for private adult communications",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Private consenting-adult limit on the duty",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-privacy-factor",
      "label": "Privacy in reasonably practicable measures",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Sections26-26A proportionality considers privacy with severity, likelihood, knowledge, availability and cost. Not a blanket encryption exemption or proven compliant implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed safeguard"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-privacy-factor",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-privacy-factor",
        "name": "Privacy in reasonably practicable measures",
        "role": "Proposed safeguard",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Sections26-26A proportionality considers privacy with severity, likelihood, knowledge, availability and cost. Not a blanket encryption exemption or proven compliant implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Sections26-26A proportionality considers privacy with severity, likelihood, knowledge, availability and cost. Not a blanket encryption exemption or proven compliant implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sections26-26A proportionality considers privacy with severity, likelihood, knowledge, availability and cost. Not a blanket encryption exemption or proven compliant implementation.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed safeguard",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections26-26A consider privacy alongside risk and practicability. Not a blanket encryption exemption, universal consent rule or observed operational safeguard.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes privacy in proportionality assessment",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Privacy in reasonably practicable measures",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-merits-review",
      "label": "Review of specified enforcement decisions",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Draft provides ART review of specified decisions including duty directions; existing internal review may apply. No automatic stay or universal merits appeal established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed safeguard"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-merits-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-merits-review",
        "name": "Review of specified enforcement decisions",
        "role": "Proposed safeguard",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Draft provides ART review of specified decisions including duty directions; existing internal review may apply. No automatic stay or universal merits appeal established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Draft provides ART review of specified decisions including duty directions; existing internal review may apply. No automatic stay or universal merits appeal established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Draft provides ART review of specified decisions including duty directions; existing internal review may apply. No automatic stay or universal merits appeal established.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed safeguard",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Schedule2 item58 adds specified decisions including26D directions to ART review. No general automatic stay or complete instrument/disallowance audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "makes specified decisions reviewable",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Review of specified enforcement decisions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Review is a boundary on specified proposed decisions, not evidence of a successful appeal or ability to reverse every rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-review-esafety"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would permit review of specified Commissioner decisions",
            "sourceName": "Review of specified enforcement decisions",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-research-role",
      "label": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Section205B university employment plus approval under future legislative rules, university ethics and prescribed public-interest research. No automatic NGO or company data right.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-research-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-research-role",
        "name": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
        "role": "Proposed role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Section205B university employment plus approval under future legislative rules, university ethics and prescribed public-interest research. No automatic NGO or company data right.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Section205B university employment plus approval under future legislative rules, university ethics and prescribed public-interest research. No automatic NGO or company data right."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This profile represents the class of researchers that Australia's September 2026 digital-duty-of-care exposure draft would make eligible for a regulated platform-data access scheme. Proposed section 205B requires Australian-university employment, approval under future rules, university ethics approval and prescribed public-interest research.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed gate between platform-held information and authorized public-interest research",
        "significance": "Eligibility determines who can independently inspect platform behavior and who must work through another institution. The university requirement is therefore a substantive design choice: earlier Reset and HRLC submissions sought direct third-sector or civil-society eligibility. University collaboration remains possible, but organizational advocacy alone would not confer the proposed data right.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How access would work",
            "text": "Sections 205B–L leave approval, conditions, fees, revocation and safeguards to a future scheme. Authorized research could include constrained fictitious accounts, with interaction limits and exclusions involving criminal material. The minister would establish rules, with Commissioner approvals where those rules provide. These are draft arrangements published on 8 September 2026; the record does not show an operating scheme, awarded access or an actual platform-data transfer.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-research",
              "w10-duty-e-research-narrower",
              "w10-duty-e-minister-research",
              "w10-duty-e-research-provider",
              "w13-disp-e-draft-narrows-hrlc-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections205B-F/240: delegated approval, conditions, fees and revocation; conflict/privacy/security/confidentiality safeguards await rules. Commissioner approvals if rules provide. No completed scheme or awarded data right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-minister-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would establish access and approval scheme through rules",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Explicit text comparison: Reset requested third-sector inclusion;205B university requirement does not grant independent eligibility to every NGO. University collaboration or indirect benefit remains possible.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-research-narrower"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset third-sector research-access request",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "university requirement narrows requested independent eligibility",
            "sourceName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "targetName": "Reset third-sector research-access request",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Sections205B-L: access depends on future rules and eligibility; fictitious accounts limited to authorized research, with interaction constraints and criminal-material exclusions. No actual transfer acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-research-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Covered online-service providers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "could obtain scheme-governed research access and test accounts",
            "sourceName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "targetName": "Covered online-service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section205B: Australian-university employment, approval under legislative rules, ethics and prescribed public-interest research. Not NGO/company access merely by invitation or affiliation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-draft-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would restrict eligibility to approved university researchers",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Comparison:205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approval/ethics/public-interest requirements;205C delegates safeguards. No inferred motive, formal HRLC-specific rejection or bar on university collaboration. Existing draft/research role reused.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-draft-narrows-hrlc-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "proposed university eligibility is narrower than HRLC direct-access request",
            "sourceName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "targetName": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-third-sector-request",
      "label": "Reset third-sector research-access request",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "2024 submission sought vetted access including third-sector organizations. Independent NGO eligibility is broader than draft205B university requirement; collaboration remains possible.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w10-duty-third-sector-request",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-third-sector-request",
        "name": "Reset third-sector research-access request",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2024 submission sought vetted access including third-sector organizations. Independent NGO eligibility is broader than draft205B university requirement; collaboration remains possible.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 submission sought vetted access including third-sector organizations. Independent NGO eligibility is broader than draft205B university requirement; collaboration remains possible."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "dutycare",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2024 submission sought vetted access including third-sector organizations. Independent NGO eligibility is broader than draft205B university requirement; collaboration remains possible.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Explicit text comparison: Reset requested third-sector inclusion;205B university requirement does not grant independent eligibility to every NGO. University collaboration or indirect benefit remains possible.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-research-narrower"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "university requirement narrows requested independent eligibility",
            "sourceName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "targetName": "Reset third-sector research-access request",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed26/PDF28 of2024 submission. Desired eligibility, not a granted right, contract or regulator designation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w10-duty-e-reset-research-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests vetted access including third-sector organizations",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset third-sector research-access request",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-luminate",
      "label": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Accounts record Luminate partnership income; narrative says Luminate/Reset. Contracting legal entity unresolved; not two separate grants or automatic identity with Luminate Foundation Inc.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-luminate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-luminate",
        "name": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Accounts record Luminate partnership income; narrative says Luminate/Reset. Contracting legal entity unresolved; not two separate grants or automatic identity with Luminate Foundation Inc.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Accounts record Luminate partnership income; narrative says Luminate/Reset. Contracting legal entity unresolved; not two separate grants or automatic identity with Luminate Foundation Inc."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Luminate is the funding label used in Carnegie UK’s accounts for partnership income supporting harm-regulation and social-media work. Some accompanying narrative uses “Luminate/Reset.” The retained accounts do not resolve the exact contracting legal entity behind that label.",
        "structuralRole": "A named source of support for the UK duty-model programme",
        "significance": "This link identifies financial resources sustaining a specific policy programme. The name requires careful entity resolution: two labels in a narrative need not mean two grants, and a familiar foundation name does not by itself identify the party to the agreement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Income and subsequent use",
            "text": "Carnegie reports £123,330 of relevant partnership income in 2021 and £168,844 in 2023. Opening balances and later expenditure or transfer entries track the fund’s use; they are not additional independent donations. The purpose supports harm-regulation work, while donor approval rights over particular wording remain outside the disclosed accounts.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2021",
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recipient Carnegie accounts identifyGBP123,330 for2021 Harm Regulation/Social Media. Opening108,357, reported expenditure107,756, closing123,931; no bank receipt or personal payment. Support sustains work that predates this award-year. Financial details: value: 123,330; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2021"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
            "sourceName": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GBP168,844 income2023 plus1,431 opening balance equals170,275 resources expended/transfer, closingzero. Narrative Luminate/Reset is not a second grant. Note16 opening-year heading anomaly retained. Financial details: value: 168,844; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2023",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
            "sourceName": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "Carnegie UK: recipient identity and restricted purpose",
            "text": "The 2023 accounts note4 reports GBP168,844 Luminate partnership income for2023. Note16 records the online-safety fund spending/transfer line as170,275 for Luminate,35,460 for Minderoo and3,600 for an unnamed donation, closing at zero. Narrative printed8 calls the financial support Luminate/Reset; this does not resolve the contracting legal entity or mean two separate grants. Note16 states the funding supported completion of work on the Online Safety Act.",
            "matched": [
              "Luminate"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ac447acc4a008a3957dcb9f4e84d78d2174c0cecbdbd54be0dc15b2d327d3a93"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "Carnegie UK: recipient identity and restricted purpose",
            "text": "2021 balances and spending: Luminate opening108,357 + income123,330 - expenditure107,756 = closing123,931; Minderoo opening0 + income122,500 - expenditure32,468 = closing90,032. The 2022 comparative within the 2023 accounts reports no new income to these funds: Luminate resources expended and transfers122,500, closing1,431; Minderoo resources expended and transfers54,572, closing35,460. These are movements in the same funds, not additional grants to sum indiscriminately.",
            "matched": [
              "Luminate"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "38e4dab93c9fc9d5bafc84f7316a19e3bb8f5b817cb738f39b132c1ed20d6569"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-minderoo",
      "label": "Minderoo Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named restricted project funder and Frontier Technology initiative parent in advice announcement. Exact grant instrument/individual decision rights not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-minderoo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-minderoo",
        "name": "Minderoo Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named restricted project funder and Frontier Technology initiative parent in advice announcement. Exact grant instrument/individual decision rights not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named restricted project funder and Frontier Technology initiative parent in advice announcement. Exact grant instrument/individual decision rights not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Minderoo Foundation is identified as a funder of Carnegie UK’s harm-regulation work and, through its Frontier Technology initiative, as supporting related international policy advice. The accounts and public acknowledgment concern a defined programme and output.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropic support connecting domestic model work to international advice",
        "significance": "Minderoo’s relevance is the resource connection between a sustained online-safety programme and a named international-policy activity. Acknowledged support helps trace capacity and reach. The underlying grant instrument would be needed to identify individual approval rights or required conclusions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The amount and the acknowledgment",
            "text": "Carnegie reports £122,500 in restricted Minderoo income for 2021. Subsequent spending and transfers reduce that fund through 2023 rather than establish fresh income. A November 2021 announcement credits support for advice to a UN minority-issues rapporteur; it may describe use of the existing programme funding, so it is not counted here as another award.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo2021",
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recipient reportsGBP122,500 income2021, closing90,032.2022 resources expended/transfers54,572 leave35,460;2023 expended/transfer35,460 closes fund. Later movements are not additional income or demonstrated cash transfers. Financial details: value: 122,500; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo2021"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "accounts report restricted grant income",
            "sourceName": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Coalition website includes this organization in its member roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-member-w11-fund-minderoo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed coalition member",
            "sourceName": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "22November2021 announcement credits support for named UN advice. Amount unknown; may apply existing project funding, so no independent extra award counted. No donor-required conclusions or UN adoption established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "financial support credited through Frontier Technology initiative",
            "sourceName": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "targetName": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
            "date": "Support credited22November2021; payment/award dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "An identifiable financed international output",
            "text": "Carnegie's22November2021 announcement credits Frontier Technology, a Minderoo Foundation initiative, for financial support of its advice to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues. Woods/Perrin carried the systems/risk approach into that advice. This is attributable financial support for a named international output. It is not evidence the UN adopted all its recommendations, or that Minderoo dictated them. Amount and agreement remain absent; do not count this as a new additional grant outside the accounts' project funding.",
            "matched": [
              "Minderoo Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a488fbec3d7e8afbae12ef6223d2a0923f7229d2730bcd73374fa625745a4c56"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "label": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Reported restricted project income sustains duty-model work and later OSA completion. Earlier model work predates the2021 income inspected; no claim this money first invented it.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
        "name": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Reported restricted project income sustains duty-model work and later OSA completion. Earlier model work predates the2021 income inspected; no claim this money first invented it.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported restricted project income sustains duty-model work and later OSA completion. Earlier model work predates the2021 income inspected; no claim this money first invented it."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Carnegie UK’s harm-regulation and online-safety programme developed and promoted a duty-based approach to digital regulation. The retained accounts show restricted income supporting that work, while programme descriptions identify drafting, evidence and international policy advice.",
        "structuralRole": "Sustained institutional support for a portable policy model",
        "significance": "The programme links an idea’s development to the resources needed to carry it between legislative settings. Restricted funding can sustain staff and specified work, but an account’s purpose category does not disclose a donor’s right to dictate an amendment. The model also predates the particular funding years examined here.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the accounts measure",
            "text": "Carnegie reports £123,330 in Luminate partnership income and £122,500 in Minderoo income for 2021, and £168,844 in Luminate income for 2023. Later balances, spending and transfers describe the use of those funds rather than new donations. The programme’s recorded outputs include advice to a UN minority-issues rapporteur, without establishing adoption of that advice.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2021",
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo2021",
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2023",
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme",
              "w11-fund-e-programme-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recipient Carnegie accounts identifyGBP123,330 for2021 Harm Regulation/Social Media. Opening108,357, reported expenditure107,756, closing123,931; no bank receipt or personal payment. Support sustains work that predates this award-year. Financial details: value: 123,330; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2021"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
            "sourceName": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recipient reportsGBP122,500 income2021, closing90,032.2022 resources expended/transfers54,572 leave35,460;2023 expended/transfer35,460 closes fund. Later movements are not additional income or demonstrated cash transfers. Financial details: value: 122,500; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo2021"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "accounts report restricted grant income",
            "sourceName": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GBP168,844 income2023 plus1,431 opening balance equals170,275 resources expended/transfer, closingzero. Narrative Luminate/Reset is not a second grant. Note16 opening-year heading anomaly retained. Financial details: value: 168,844; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2023",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-luminate2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
            "sourceName": "Luminate — funding label in Carnegie accounts",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Recipient legal identity The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, ScottishSC012799/Irish20142957. Work includes bill/amendment drafting, evidence and international advice; restriction constrains purpose, not a disclosed donor clause veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates financed duty-model programme",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie UK",
            "targetName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Advice is one named output in programme history. UN adoption and all recommendation contents not audited in this wave.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-programme-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes identifiable international advice output",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "targetName": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-un-advice",
      "label": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Identifiable international advice financially supported by Minderoo initiative per22November2021 announcement. No extra award amount or adopted UN recommendations established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-un-advice",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-un-advice",
        "name": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Identifiable international advice financially supported by Minderoo initiative per22November2021 announcement. No extra award amount or adopted UN recommendations established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Identifiable international advice financially supported by Minderoo initiative per22November2021 announcement. No extra award amount or adopted UN recommendations established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Identifiable international advice financially supported by Minderoo initiative per22November2021 announcement. No extra award amount or adopted UN recommendations established.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Advice is one named output in programme history. UN adoption and all recommendation contents not audited in this wave.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-programme-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes identifiable international advice output",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie harm-regulation / online-safety programme",
            "targetName": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "22November2021 announcement credits support for named UN advice. Amount unknown; may apply existing project funding, so no independent extra award counted. No donor-required conclusions or UN adoption established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-minderoo-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "financial support credited through Frontier Technology initiative",
            "sourceName": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "targetName": "Carnegie advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur",
            "date": "Support credited22November2021; payment/award dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-carnegie-board",
      "label": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Trustees agree strategy/budgets, management executes; own endowment supplies capacity. No individual trustee vote, donor veto or grant-clearance record acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-carnegie-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-carnegie-board",
        "name": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
        "role": "Governance role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Trustees agree strategy/budgets, management executes; own endowment supplies capacity. No individual trustee vote, donor veto or grant-clearance record acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Trustees agree strategy/budgets, management executes; own endowment supplies capacity. No individual trustee vote, donor veto or grant-clearance record acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Trustees agree strategy/budgets, management executes; own endowment supplies capacity. No individual trustee vote, donor veto or grant-clearance record acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report delegates execution to management; permanent endowment supplies independent capacity. This is recipient governance, not proof a named trustee decided a particular grant or clause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-carnegie-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets strategy and agrees annual budgets",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
            "targetName": "Carnegie UK",
            "date": "2023 report; individual decision records not obtained"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "2023 report roster establishes role. Does not establish how Perrin voted, personal payments or individual publication approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-perrin-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "William Perrin",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed as trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member",
            "sourceName": "William Perrin",
            "targetName": "Carnegie trustees — programme budget authority",
            "date": "2023 report; effective tenure unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "label": "Mannifera",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Pooled funding programme with ACF sub-fund and member collective decisions. Named2024 grants; exact contracting payor, individual votes and recipient terms unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding program"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-mannifera",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "name": "Mannifera",
        "role": "Funding program",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Pooled funding programme with ACF sub-fund and member collective decisions. Named2024 grants; exact contracting payor, individual votes and recipient terms unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Pooled funding programme with ACF sub-fund and member collective decisions. Named2024 grants; exact contracting payor, individual votes and recipient terms unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
            "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mannifera is a pooled philanthropic programme whose published arrangements combine member decision-making with a fund hosted through the Australian Communities Foundation. Its 2024 grant disclosures include support for Reset.Tech Australia and the Human Rights Law Centre.",
        "structuralRole": "Pooling donor resources and selecting advocacy projects",
        "significance": "Mannifera is a place where donors’ resources are organised into a common grant programme. Member selection and the host trustee’s legal approval are separate layers of authority. That distinction helps locate who recommends an award and who can legally approve the use of charitable funds.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A selection process with identifiable stages",
            "text": "The published historical process describes executive assessment, a member shortlist, taskforce endorsement and consensus at a member gathering. The timetable inspected was for 2023, so it is not proof that every step occurred identically in the 2024 special round. That round lists $40,000 for Reset and $60,000 for HRLC; the records are awards, not verified bank receipts, and do not allocate specific 2026 legislative clauses to donors.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
                "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
                "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-acf",
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-reset",
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-hrlc",
              "w12-gov-e-member-selection",
              "w12-gov-e-acf-trustee",
              "w12-gov-e-myer-membership",
              "w12-gov-e-mann-rights-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$40,000 Signature Grant, dis/misinformation round. Supports research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry including OSA review, not particular2026 clauses. Currency code, exact award/payment date and cash receipt absent. Financial details: value: 40,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-reset"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records2024 grant for transparency advocacy",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "165,000 approvedFY2022, labelled membership2021-24, dash for commitment fromFY24. Not newFY24 cash. Separate5,000/9,100 entries not added here; current65,000 minimum not retroactively applied. Financial details: value: 165,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported earlier membership award; period: 2021-2024; approvedFY2022",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-myer-membership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
                "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Myer Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports historical three-year membership award",
            "sourceName": "The Myer Foundation",
            "targetName": "Mannifera",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "General FAQ/template identify Australian Communities Foundation Limited trustee and ABN20 077830347. Donor requests/advisory committees recommend; trustee need not follow preferences and retains authority. Not a signed Mannifera arrangement or identified payor of each grant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-acf-trustee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
                "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian Communities Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains trustee approval over hosted grant recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Australian Communities Foundation",
            "targetName": "Mannifera",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$60,000 Signature Grant. Currency code/payment state unknown. Older grants not combined; shared grantor does not establish HRLC-Reset coordination. Financial details: value: 60,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-hrlc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "EO assesses, up to six members shortlist, Taskforce endorses, voting members reach consensus at Muster. Explicit2023 timetable; not established execution of2024 special round or automatic recusal. Current Board terminology is not backdated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-member-selection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera collective decision process",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published historical process selects projects by staged consensus",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera collective decision process",
            "targetName": "Mannifera",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Guide describes partnership/sub-fund and collective decisions; ACF independently confirms members give together through it. Specific Reset/HRLC contracting payor and individual approval votes not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-acf"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian Communities Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "uses pooled ACF sub-fund route",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Australian Communities Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Acknowledgment establishes support for output; no grant number/amount or allocation of the entire60,000 award. Do not infer donor endorsement or editorial approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mann-rights-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publication acknowledges grant support",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "date": "Report dated4October2024; award/payment timing unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The most consequential bridge is McKinnon's commission of two identified reports, one of which expressly recommends considering a duty of care and the other of which transmits EU and UK transparency models. Mannifera supplies a quantified award for advocacy during the Online Safety Act review. The Internet Society Foundation award has a different, documented children's-privacy research purpose.",
            "matched": [
              "Mannifera"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7b386bc26637351bb72286c0be8dc15529c271422a5a2cccdd52ab1e3a8fb82b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
            "heading": "Recipient disclosure and entity boundaries",
            "text": "The Mannifera identification is supported by the donor explicitly naming Reset, rather than merely correcting a similar spelling. Internet Society Foundation's return gives the legal recipient name. The other recipient-only names remain at their disclosed scope: no exact Boundless legal entity, unnamed donor identity, Reset US award amount or NSW reimbursement amount is resolved by this pass. The closed ACNC route was not reopened.",
            "matched": [
              "Mannifera"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "34eeee2d55fb66be58149402caff1702d589a96e00227aeb68990128ae755c06"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output",
            "heading": "Record-to-decision conclusion",
            "text": "The narrow next records are the special-round assessment/shortlist and conflict-management record; the Mannifera–ACF executed arrangement and HRLC approval/grant letter; and HRLC's expert-convening agenda, participant list, agreed statement/version history and grant-completion report. Those would distinguish a jointly endorsed reform position from a named author's funded framework and later compatible advocacy. Likely custodians are Mannifera/ACF for selection and grants, and HRLC for the convening and output. No request has been sent.",
            "matched": [
              "Mannifera"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4b8ca0f1e682cf3aa8a8bfa4328971e4290f26f27945360f87ba3ac2f7b153e8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output",
            "heading": "Record-to-decision conclusion",
            "text": "The supported chain is: a member contributes or commits to the pool; Mannifera's published process selects aligned projects; ACF retains grant authority under its general arrangements; an HRLC publication credits Mannifera and articulates a regulatory position; HRLC reports taking that work to Parliament. The actual 2024 selection file, grant contract and coalition endorsement record are separate missing links. No single member's control of the project, common donor instruction over report text, or government adoption of all recommendations has been established.",
            "matched": [
              "Mannifera"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "94b2f5ebdbbdebba2e53bb410ef5b991dc80e6381f722eb3432fa38424b1e709"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
            "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-acf",
      "label": "Australian Communities Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Mannifera funds route and administrator described by guide and own report. No automatic assignment as legal payor of specific Reset/HRLC contracts.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-acf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-acf",
        "name": "Australian Communities Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Mannifera funds route and administrator described by guide and own report. No automatic assignment as legal payor of specific Reset/HRLC contracts.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Mannifera funds route and administrator described by guide and own report. No automatic assignment as legal payor of specific Reset/HRLC contracts."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
            "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Australian Communities Foundation hosts philanthropic funds and provides the trustee structure used by Mannifera’s pooled-giving arrangement. Its public guidance distinguishes donor recommendations from the trustee’s authority to approve grants.",
        "structuralRole": "The legal approval layer beneath pooled philanthropy",
        "significance": "ACF matters because a named donor circle and the entity with legal responsibility for distributing funds are not necessarily the same thing. Its role helps separate the selection of an attractive project from the authority to approve a charitable payment and the administration needed to deliver it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Recommendations versus trustee discretion",
            "text": "The general FAQ and template identify Australian Communities Foundation Limited as trustee and explain that donor preferences or advisory committees recommend grants. The trustee need not follow those preferences. These documents describe the framework; they do not identify the signed Mannifera agreement or the exact payor of each Reset or HRLC award.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
                "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-acf",
              "w12-gov-e-acf-trustee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "General FAQ/template identify Australian Communities Foundation Limited trustee and ABN20 077830347. Donor requests/advisory committees recommend; trustee need not follow preferences and retains authority. Not a signed Mannifera arrangement or identified payor of each grant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-acf-trustee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
                "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains trustee approval over hosted grant recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Australian Communities Foundation",
            "targetName": "Mannifera",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Guide describes partnership/sub-fund and collective decisions; ACF independently confirms members give together through it. Specific Reset/HRLC contracting payor and individual approval votes not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-acf"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
                "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "uses pooled ACF sub-fund route",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Australian Communities Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
            "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "label": "Human Rights Law Centre",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Mannifera records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy. A later grantor account expressly names HRLC and Digital Rights Watch as partners in Reset transparency advocacy; exact joint output, endorsement and adopted clause remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-hrlc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "name": "Human Rights Law Centre",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Mannifera records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy. A later grantor account expressly names HRLC and Digital Rights Watch as partners in Reset transparency advocacy; exact joint output, endorsement and adopted clause remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Mannifera records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy. A later grantor account expressly names HRLC and Digital Rights Watch as partners in Reset transparency advocacy; exact joint output, endorsement and adopted clause remain unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Human Rights Law Centre is an Australian legal-advocacy organisation. In the retained research it develops rights-based proposals for digital regulation, receives disclosed support for expert coordination and advocate training, and is named as a partner in Reset.Tech Australia’s transparency advocacy.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal expertise and coalition work entering regulatory debate",
        "significance": "HRLC links funding, expert networks and a public legal framework. Its programme turns resources into research, training, submissions and parliamentary engagement. The strongest partnership evidence is the grantor’s explicit identification of HRLC with Reset, rather than an inference drawn merely from their common funder.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The funded work and its public route",
            "text": "Mannifera’s 2024 grant listing records $60,000 for aligning legal and technical expertise on misinformation, online-safety and privacy reform and training advocates. The currency code and cash receipt were not established in that listing. HRLC’s Rights-First work and its reported October 2024 parliamentary engagement are identifiable outputs and access routes, distinct from proof that government adopted its recommendations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-hrlc",
              "w11-fund-e-hrlc-purpose",
              "w12-gov-e-reset-hrlc-partner",
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-launch",
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-parliament",
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-submission",
              "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-hrlc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "$60,000 Signature Grant. Currency code/payment state unknown. Older grants not combined; shared grantor does not establish HRLC-Reset coordination. Financial details: value: 60,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mannifera-hrlc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-hrlc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
            "sourceName": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
            "targetName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "date": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "7October launch advocates independent regulator, duty, rights assessment and penalties. Institutional advocacy is distinct from attributing every report line to donor/consultees; proposals not government adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "launches related institutional regulatory recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "date": "2024-10-07 – 2024-10-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Purpose aligns legal/tech experts on2024 misinformation, OSA and privacy reforms, trains advocates and makes public case. No full participant roster, agreed clause or completed alignment outcome acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-hrlc-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC expert alignment and advocate training",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named grantee for expert alignment and advocate training",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "HRLC expert alignment and advocate training",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document dated5July2024. Exact receipt day not established; publication on departmental host is not government endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-submission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued review submission",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "date": "Document date5July2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "EO round account explicitly names HRLC and Digital Rights Watch as Reset partners. Stronger than common-donor inference; does not identify joint report authorship, complete coalition roster or endorsement of every recommendation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-reset-hrlc-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "grantor names HRLC partner in funded transparency advocacy",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "date": "Account of special2024 round; exact publication/implementation dates absent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Displayed8October2024 account identifies Mejia-Canales representing HRLC. No independent meeting minutes or accepted wording; URL year differs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-parliament"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports taking framework to Parliament and government",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
            "date": "Displayed8October2024; exact meeting date not independently established"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-alignment-work",
      "label": "HRLC expert alignment and advocate training",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Grantor describes aligning legal/tech experts and training advocates for2024 misinformation, online-safety and privacy reforms. Purpose rather than verified completed common text.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funded purpose"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-alignment-work",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-alignment-work",
        "name": "HRLC expert alignment and advocate training",
        "role": "Funded purpose",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Grantor describes aligning legal/tech experts and training advocates for2024 misinformation, online-safety and privacy reforms. Purpose rather than verified completed common text.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Grantor describes aligning legal/tech experts and training advocates for2024 misinformation, online-safety and privacy reforms. Purpose rather than verified completed common text."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Grantor describes aligning legal/tech experts and training advocates for2024 misinformation, online-safety and privacy reforms. Purpose rather than verified completed common text.",
        "structuralRole": "Funded purpose",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Purpose aligns legal/tech experts on2024 misinformation, OSA and privacy reforms, trains advocates and makes public case. No full participant roster, agreed clause or completed alignment outcome acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-hrlc-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named grantee for expert alignment and advocate training",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "HRLC expert alignment and advocate training",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-reset-advocacy",
      "label": "Reset transparency-advocacy grant purpose",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2024 Mannifera grant supports transparency research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry, including OSA review. No specific2026 clause earmark.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funded purpose"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-reset-advocacy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-reset-advocacy",
        "name": "Reset transparency-advocacy grant purpose",
        "role": "Funded purpose",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2024 Mannifera grant supports transparency research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry, including OSA review. No specific2026 clause earmark.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 Mannifera grant supports transparency research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry, including OSA review. No specific2026 clause earmark."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2024 Mannifera grant supports transparency research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry, including OSA review. No specific2026 clause earmark.",
        "structuralRole": "Funded purpose",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Funded purpose names policy development around misinformation bill/OSA review. No allocation to every Reset activity or proof government adopted conclusions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named grantee for transparency-advocacy purpose",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset transparency-advocacy grant purpose",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "label": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Names two2023/24 Reset commissions. Present privacy policy identifies a group entity; historic contractual party and publication-clearance rights unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "name": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Names two2023/24 Reset commissions. Present privacy policy identifies a group entity; historic contractual party and publication-clearance rights unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Names two2023/24 Reset commissions. Present privacy policy identifies a group entity; historic contractual party and publication-clearance rights unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon privacy policy —September2025",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/privacy-policy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "McKinnon is the organisation named as commissioning two Reset research projects on platform transparency and the Australian misinformation code. Its public account describes commissions across 2023–2024; the research preserves uncertainty about the precise historical contracting entity within the wider group.",
        "structuralRole": "Commissioning research that can shape a regulatory agenda",
        "significance": "Commissioning is a more specific resource relationship than general donor support: it identifies a requested research product. The important remaining contractual questions concern who selected the question, approved publication, owned the output and paid the fee. Public attribution establishes the commission without answering all of those questions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The identifiable outputs",
            "text": "The two named reports are Functioning or Failing? in May 2024 and Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in June 2024. An April 2024 briefing separately acknowledges support. The disclosures do not establish that the briefing was another paid commission or state the fees. Current group-entity listings cannot substitute for the signatures on the historical agreements.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning",
              "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-transparency",
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-trust",
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-research",
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-charitable",
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-briefing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Commission of this report identified among commissions reported across2023-24. Exact commission date unallocated by source; no disclosed amount, clearance rights or fee schedule. Present privacy-policy entity does not prove historic counterparty.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-transparency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports commissioning comparative transparency research",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
            "date": "Commissions reported across2023-24; exact date for this commission unknown; reportJune2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "McKinnon identifies2023 commission; May2024 report says early2023 approach and describes Reset designing methods. Fee, historic legal party, IP/publication approval and donor-required conclusions unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports commissioning misinformation-code research",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "date": "Commission identified2023; reportMay2024; exact contract/payment dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Amount/form unknown. Not automatically one of the two separate named commissions or a fresh additional payment. Recipient retains errors/omissions responsibility; attendance not endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-briefing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "briefing acknowledges support",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
            "date": "BriefingApril2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-charitable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The most consequential bridge is McKinnon's commission of two identified reports, one of which expressly recommends considering a duty of care and the other of which transmits EU and UK transparency models. Mannifera supplies a quantified award for advocacy during the Online Safety Act review. The Internet Society Foundation award has a different, documented children's-privacy research purpose.",
            "matched": [
              "McKinnon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7b386bc26637351bb72286c0be8dc15529c271422a5a2cccdd52ab1e3a8fb82b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
            "heading": "Integration limit and next obtainable records",
            "text": "The narrow next records are the Mannifera/ACF grant letter and disbursement record identifying Reset's legal counterparty and restrictions; the Foundation's executed phase-two agreement, amendments and instalment reconciliation; and McKinnon's 2023/24 scopes of work, executed contracts and publication-clearance provisions. Likely custodians are the named grantor/administrator and Reset. Their absence here leaves payment timing and substantive approval rights unresolved, not presumed absent. No request or outreach has been made.",
            "matched": [
              "McKinnon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "81e654abf4ba3a11c4e8b63ae30807f8689eb919c54270158526ef29d92cadc1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance",
            "heading": "Reading and custody",
            "text": "All URLs above are primary issuer/recipient/ABR records. Access state is read only for the stated passages; no whole-report content audit is claimed. Source ancestry: existing funding note supplied discovery; McKinnon's page links the commissioned recipient outputs; financial statements are published on McKinnon's Storyblok asset host; ABR independently supplies registered identity/history. These are not ACNC mirrors accessed through a workaround. Search results on ACNC/storage and unrelated biographies were excluded without opening.",
            "matched": [
              "McKinnon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "96176f6201e78664fd1b9c9295d708298925190ff1bf4f3f2baf2e69604ecc89"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance",
            "heading": "Candidate directional relations and limits",
            "text": "The next discriminating records are the 2023/24 executed Reset engagement letters and scopes , identifying legal counterparties, fee, milestones, publication rights and approval/termination terms; Research Committee terms of reference, membership/appointment resolutions and relevant minutes ; and the single-member register and constitutions in force when those decisions were made. Custodians are McKinnon's historical entities/current records holder and Reset. Appointment resolutions would distinguish founders' public sponsorship of appointments from their actual legal power. Contract allocation records would determine whether the Research Centre route applies to these commissions. None was obtained, and no contact was made.",
            "matched": [
              "McKinnon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e4437ede471c177844315f8778fe6bb7dca3bfb62005f0c5a3509417687a9ec6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon privacy policy —September2025",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/privacy-policy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-functioning",
      "label": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Commissioned misinformation-code research recommending consideration of a duty, EU-style assessments and researcher access. No bill commission or governmental adoption established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-functioning",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-functioning",
        "name": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Commissioned misinformation-code research recommending consideration of a duty, EU-style assessments and researcher access. No bill commission or governmental adoption established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Commissioned misinformation-code research recommending consideration of a duty, EU-style assessments and researcher access. No bill commission or governmental adoption established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Commissioned misinformation-code research recommending consideration of a duty, EU-style assessments and researcher access. No bill commission or governmental adoption established.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recommendations include considering a duty for misinformation/disinformation, EU-style risk assessment and researcher access. Not a commission of the whole2026 bill or evidence of adoption; experiments not independently audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-functioning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes research with duty and assessment recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "date": "May2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "McKinnon identifies2023 commission; May2024 report says early2023 approach and describes Reset designing methods. Fee, historic legal party, IP/publication approval and donor-required conclusions unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports commissioning misinformation-code research",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "date": "Commission identified2023; reportMay2024; exact contract/payment dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-transparency",
      "label": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Commissioned comparison proposes Australian transparency/risk/audit/research mechanisms using EU DSA/UK OSA models. Not adopted legislation or proven donor-required conclusions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-transparency",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-transparency",
        "name": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Commissioned comparison proposes Australian transparency/risk/audit/research mechanisms using EU DSA/UK OSA models. Not adopted legislation or proven donor-required conclusions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Commissioned comparison proposes Australian transparency/risk/audit/research mechanisms using EU DSA/UK OSA models. Not adopted legislation or proven donor-required conclusions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Commissioned comparison proposes Australian transparency/risk/audit/research mechanisms using EU DSA/UK OSA models. Not adopted legislation or proven donor-required conclusions.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Opening summary proposes Australian risk assessments, annual reports, audits, portals and researcher access across safety/misinformation frameworks. Model transmission is explicit; government uptake not established here.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-transparency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes comparison proposing EU and UK mechanisms",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
            "date": "June2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Commission of this report identified among commissions reported across2023-24. Exact commission date unallocated by source; no disclosed amount, clearance rights or fee schedule. Present privacy-policy entity does not prove historic counterparty.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-transparency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports commissioning comparative transparency research",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency —June2024",
            "date": "Commissions reported across2023-24; exact date for this commission unknown; reportJune2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-isf",
      "label": "Internet Society Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "2024 return EIN82-3285688. Distinct from Internet Society and unspecified global Reset. Accrual return and project award not cash evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-isf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-isf",
        "name": "Internet Society Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2024 return EIN82-3285688. Distinct from Internet Society and unspecified global Reset. Accrual return and project award not cash evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 return EIN82-3285688. Distinct from Internet Society and unspecified global Reset. Accrual return and project award not cash evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Internet Society Foundation is a grantmaking entity distinct from the Internet Society. The investigation links it to research on children’s privacy expectations and to a named support entry for Reset Tech Australia Limited in its 2024 annual return.",
        "structuralRole": "Research funding tied to a named legal recipient",
        "significance": "The foundation supplies a concrete funding route into research relevant to digital-policy debates. Following both the project award and the recipient disclosure is useful, but the two figures cannot be treated as separate cash payments without reconciling the reporting basis and payment schedule.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The two financial records",
            "text": "A published $219,000 US-dollar award covers phase-two privacy research from 8 January 2024 to 7 July 2025, including education technology and targeting. The 2024 return reports $87,600 for Reset Tech Australia Limited on an accrual basis. The evidence does not show how that entry maps to instalments of the larger award or make it a commission for the digital duty-of-care proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-isf-award",
              "w11-fund-e-isf-annual-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 ScheduleA names Reset Tech Australia Limited US$87,600. Accrual reporting, not cash receipt; no demonstrated instalment reconciliation withUS$219,000 award. Unnamed ScheduleF row not assigned. No merge with global Reset. Financial details: value: 87,600; currency: USD; kind: reported monetary support (accrual); period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-isf-annual-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "annual return reports monetary support to named legal recipient",
            "sourceName": "Internet Society Foundation",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "US$219,000 project award,8January2024-7July2025. Research on youth privacy in education technology/targeting and regulator implementation. Award total is not annual paid cash or a duty-of-care commission. Financial details: value: 219,000; currency: USD; kind: published project award; period: 2024-01-08 to2025-07-07",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-isf-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Children privacy expectations — phase-two research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "lists phase-two children privacy research award",
            "sourceName": "Internet Society Foundation",
            "targetName": "Children privacy expectations — phase-two research",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
            "heading": "Recipient disclosure and entity boundaries",
            "text": "The Mannifera identification is supported by the donor explicitly naming Reset, rather than merely correcting a similar spelling. Internet Society Foundation's return gives the legal recipient name. The other recipient-only names remain at their disclosed scope: no exact Boundless legal entity, unnamed donor identity, Reset US award amount or NSW reimbursement amount is resolved by this pass. The closed ACNC route was not reopened.",
            "matched": [
              "Internet Society Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "34eeee2d55fb66be58149402caff1702d589a96e00227aeb68990128ae755c06"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
            "heading": "Integration limit and next obtainable records",
            "text": "Safe financial verbs are: Mannifera records a 2024 grant for transparency advocacy ; Internet Society Foundation lists a phase-two research award and reports annual monetary support ; McKinnon says it commissioned two identified reports ; Reset describes the commissioning approach and publishes recommendations . None should be replaced by “paid for the bill,” “dictated the duty” or “approved the final clauses.” The strongest supported mechanism is financing research and advocacy that formulates and circulates regulatory models. This pass does not isolate that funding's causal effect on government choices.",
            "matched": [
              "Internet Society Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2223981a3abbb5e8177525d2ce2b08bc0078fceee818f5999744de76eaac2b9a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-privacy-project",
      "label": "Children privacy expectations — phase-two research",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "US$219,000 award record for8Jan2024-7July2025 privacy research in education technology/targeting. Separate purpose from duty-of-care advocacy; implementation expectations not completed findings.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funded project"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w11-fund-privacy-project",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-privacy-project",
        "name": "Children privacy expectations — phase-two research",
        "role": "Funded project",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "US$219,000 award record for8Jan2024-7July2025 privacy research in education technology/targeting. Separate purpose from duty-of-care advocacy; implementation expectations not completed findings.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "US$219,000 award record for8Jan2024-7July2025 privacy research in education technology/targeting. Separate purpose from duty-of-care advocacy; implementation expectations not completed findings."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "US$219,000 award record for8Jan2024-7July2025 privacy research in education technology/targeting. Separate purpose from duty-of-care advocacy; implementation expectations not completed findings.",
        "structuralRole": "Funded project",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "US$219,000 project award,8January2024-7July2025. Research on youth privacy in education technology/targeting and regulator implementation. Award total is not annual paid cash or a duty-of-care commission. Financial details: value: 219,000; currency: USD; kind: published project award; period: 2024-01-08 to2025-07-07",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-isf-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Society Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "lists phase-two children privacy research award",
            "sourceName": "Internet Society Foundation",
            "targetName": "Children privacy expectations — phase-two research",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Award page names Reset Tech Australia. Described methods and expected results do not establish completed outputs or allocation to unrelated policy work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w11-fund-e-reset-privacy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named operator of intended phase-two research",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Children privacy expectations — phase-two research",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "label": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company14982650, limited by guarantee without share capital. Listed among privacy-notice entities; no proof it alone operates/contracts for OSN. Whole-company accounts are not network budget.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
        "name": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company14982650, limited by guarantee without share capital. Listed among privacy-notice entities; no proof it alone operates/contracts for OSN. Whole-company accounts are not network budget.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company14982650, limited by guarantee without share capital. Listed among privacy-notice entities; no proof it alone operates/contracts for OSN. Whole-company accounts are not network budget."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reset Tech UK Limited is company 14982650, a UK company limited by guarantee without share capital. It is one of the legal entities named in Reset's privacy-notice coverage. Its own constitution and accounts allow the UK corporate structure to be examined separately from the wider Reset brand.",
        "structuralRole": "Identifiable UK legal vehicle within Reset's cross-border organizational structure",
        "significance": "The company supplies a place to locate actual governance rules and financial balances. That is particularly useful where a network describes Reset as its operator: a brand-level operational statement does not tell the reader which entity signs every contract, employs each worker or bears every programme cost.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The May 2025 constitution gives management and revocable delegation powers to directors who are also members. It expressly includes Reset Tech Australia Limited in a defined Group Company category used in conflict rules. This contractual grouping is not an ownership chart. The 2024 accounts record £1,156 receivable from Reset Tech Action gGmbH at year end, a balance owed to the UK company rather than an observed payment or the Online Safety Network's budget.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-notice-entity",
              "w12-gov-e-uk-board-powers",
              "w12-gov-e-uk-australia-group",
              "w12-gov-e-action-receivable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
              "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Schedule1 names Reset Tech Australia Limited among defined companies. Article17 provides conflict-participation exceptions, with other-director exclusion and non-exempt benefit rules. Definition is not parent ownership or proof of an exercised conflicted vote. Australian organization node reused at its named legal-recipient scope; no global merger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-australia-group"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
                "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly lists Australian entity within defined Group Company category",
            "sourceName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "targetName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GBP1,156 owed to UK company at2024 year end, a balance not observed cash transfer. Legal registration and identity with similarly named constitutional entity unverified. Whole-company amounts are not network budget. Financial details: value: 1,156; currency: GBP; kind: reported receivable stock; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-action-receivable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Tech Action gGmbH — named debtor",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "UK accounts report year-end amount receivable from named entity",
            "sourceName": "Reset Tech Action gGmbH — named debtor",
            "targetName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles9-16,20-24: director members manage, appoint, delegate and may retract delegation; committee spending needs authority/budget. Collective majorities, quorum and chair tie-break apply; no identified external donor veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-board-powers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds constitutional management and revocable delegation powers",
            "sourceName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "targetName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolution headed7May2025, filed21May. Earlier incorporation names him sole subscriber; adoption does not establish a surviving named reserve under the new text.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-scott-adoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agrees to May2025 replacement constitution as voting member",
            "sourceName": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
            "targetName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "date": "2025-05-07 – 2025-05-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "UK company named in privacy-notice coverage; single-organization treatment is for notice purposes. No equity ownership, cross-border parent instruction or sole OSN contractor established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-notice-entity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "listed among notice-covered federated legal entities",
            "sourceName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "targetName": "Reset",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
            "title": "Reset UK: the control categories have an identifiable historical origin"
          },
          {
            "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
      "label": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2025 articles make directors the only members. Board management/appointments and revocable delegation; one vote each on written resolutions. No named donor reserve found.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-uk-director-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
        "name": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
        "role": "Governance role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2025 articles make directors the only members. Board management/appointments and revocable delegation; one vote each on written resolutions. No named donor reserve found.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2025 articles make directors the only members. Board management/appointments and revocable delegation; one vote each on written resolutions. No named donor reserve found."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the governing decision body created by Reset Tech UK's May 2025 articles. Directors are the company's only members, bringing corporate management and membership voting within the same body. It is a collective constitutional role, rather than a separate organization or an individual controller.",
        "structuralRole": "Constitutional authority for management, appointments, delegation and protected amendments",
        "significance": "These rules identify the mechanism by which decisions can be made and reversed. Following quorum, voting and delegation provisions is more informative than reading influence directly from a person-with-significant-control band. The protected-purpose provisions also show where an ordinary majority is insufficient.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "Articles 9–16 and 20–24 provide for management, appointments and revocable delegation; committee spending requires authority or an approved budget. Each member has one vote on written resolutions. Specified entrenched changes—including purposes, asset-lock, winding-up and entrenchment provisions—require member unanimity; other special written resolutions require 75%. Officer records list Dale Benjamin Scott and Poppy Wood as directors appointed on 5 July 2023, before the new membership framework.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-board-powers",
              "w12-gov-e-uk-member-limits",
              "w12-gov-e-scott-board",
              "w12-gov-e-wood-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles9-16,20-24: director members manage, appoint, delegate and may retract delegation; committee spending needs authority/budget. Collective majorities, quorum and chair tie-break apply; no identified external donor veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-board-powers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds constitutional management and revocable delegation powers",
            "sourceName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "targetName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article8 covers purposes, asset lock, winding-up and entrenchment; other special written resolutions75%. Directors are members, each has one written vote. These thresholds are not a finding of present50/50 control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-member-limits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset UK entrenched purposes and conflict rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must obtain member unanimity for specified entrenched amendments",
            "sourceName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "targetName": "Reset UK entrenched purposes and conflict rules",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Public register appoints5July2023;2025 constitution makes directors members. Do not project new automatic-membership rule back to2023 or infer a specific individual board vote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-scott-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed as company director",
            "sourceName": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
            "targetName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "date": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Public register appoints5July2023; current constitution makes directors members. This is not a measured current ownership percentage or proof every record is up to date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-wood-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Poppy Wood",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed as company director",
            "sourceName": "Poppy Wood",
            "targetName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "date": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-scott",
      "label": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Listed UK director/PSC;2023 sole-subscriber origin qualifies register categories. May2025 adoption agreement does not establish a surviving individual veto.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-scott",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-scott",
        "name": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed UK director/PSC;2023 sole-subscriber origin qualifies register categories. May2025 adoption agreement does not establish a surviving individual veto.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed UK director/PSC;2023 sole-subscriber origin qualifies register categories. May2025 adoption agreement does not establish a surviving individual veto."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Dale Benjamin Scott is a registered director of Reset Tech UK Limited, appointed on 5 July 2023. The company's incorporation record identifies him as sole subscriber, and he agreed as voting member to the replacement constitution adopted on 7 May 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Named participant in the company's formation and constitutional transition",
        "significance": "Scott's records help explain why historical control categories may differ from the later director-member framework. The adoption resolution is an actual documented decision, making it stronger evidence of an exercised role than a general association. It does not establish an enduring personal reserve over future policy or spending.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The replacement articles were filed on 21 May 2025 and make directors the only members, with one written-resolution vote each. The new text does not repeat a named Scott reserve. Register control bands still require reconciliation with that transition; they should not be summed or replaced with an assumed 50/50 ownership figure in a company that has no share capital.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-scott-board",
              "w12-gov-e-scott-adoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Public register appoints5July2023;2025 constitution makes directors members. Do not project new automatic-membership rule back to2023 or infer a specific individual board vote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-scott-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed as company director",
            "sourceName": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
            "targetName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "date": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolution headed7May2025, filed21May. Earlier incorporation names him sole subscriber; adoption does not establish a surviving named reserve under the new text.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-scott-adoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agrees to May2025 replacement constitution as voting member",
            "sourceName": "Dale Benjamin Scott",
            "targetName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "date": "2025-05-07 – 2025-05-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights",
            "heading": "Instruments and reading scope",
            "text": "Companies House filing history records articles and adoption resolution filed21May2025. The resolution is headed7May2025 and replaces the previous articles immediately; it bears Dale Benjamin Scott's agreement as the voting member. Poppy Wood's PSC notification, filed19May2025, gives7May2025 as the date she became registrable. The resolution is evidence of this adoption decision, not a permanent personal veto. Its signature date is printed5/7/2025 alongside the explicit7May heading; do not reinterpret it as a later July action. A separate source anomaly is that its header prints company number4982650 while the official docket and attached articles identify14982650. Retain this discrepancy rather than silently correcting a quotation or inventing another company.",
            "matched": [
              "Dale Benjamin Scott",
              "Scott"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ae2506b21bf1dd3535c135173bffcc1f0efd2f6d507aaf5872a90de5813f7e0d"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
            "title": "Reset UK: the control categories have an identifiable historical origin",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The previously acquired7May2025 resolution is signed by Scott as voting member and replaces the constitution. New article22 makes directors the only members, with admission automatic on appointment;24.2 gives each member one vote on written resolutions. Wood's PSC notification begins on the same7May date. Together these are concrete evidence consistent with a membership transition. The new constitution does not repeat a named Scott reserve. Current PSC percentages still require reconciliation; they must not be added together or confidently replaced by a50/50 figure.",
            "matched": [
              "Scott"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d5076e83daa1dda4ae4cd97ca82143e449ab78573883cf21b00e172ac027ba00"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights",
            "heading": "Suggested typed relations and next record",
            "text": "Use company14982650 → board for constitutional management/delegation; board → director/member role for appointment/admission; eligible members → entrenched provisions for unanimous amendment consent. Record UK company → each listed Group Company as defined constitutional grouping for conflict rules , not equity ownership or parent control. Scott → May2025 adoption is an observed resolution agreement. Keep PSC assertions as attributed register records pending reconciliation, separate from the constitution's general rules. None establishes operational control of OSN merely because a network uses Reset services, or a donor veto over a funded article.",
            "matched": [
              "Scott"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e60390cb1b8af37c13ca44b859f5e69313d02726c697b757b9c07a662c814c1b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w51-clarity-procedural-vote",
            "title": "CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate",
            "heading": "CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate",
            "text": "Tim Scott's response calls for SEC and CFTC rulemaking while Congress remains unable to legislate. That is a declared alternative strategy; it neither expands agency authority nor proves adoption of a rule.",
            "matched": [
              "Scott"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cd8a2e6e49881819914856d5d64d4d7313a1e83fc23d227d791a6d2038fdbfc6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
            "title": "Reset UK: the control categories have an identifiable historical origin"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-wood",
      "label": "Poppy Wood",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Listed UK director; PSC voting band notified7May2025. Constitution makes directors members; current register and basis remain to reconcile without summing bands.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-wood",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-wood",
        "name": "Poppy Wood",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed UK director; PSC voting band notified7May2025. Constitution makes directors members; current register and basis remain to reconcile without summing bands.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed UK director; PSC voting band notified7May2025. Constitution makes directors members; current register and basis remain to reconcile without summing bands."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Poppy Wood is a registered Reset Tech UK director, appointed on 5 July 2023. Earlier, a July 2021 government account listed her as Reset Tech Senior Advisor on the Online Safety Data Initiative's expert group, giving two separately dated roles in technology-policy work.",
        "structuralRole": "Bridge between a public programme's advisory group and later corporate governance",
        "significance": "The expert-group role identifies a concrete route for Reset-associated expertise to enter a government-funded safety-technology programme. Her later directorship places her within a legal decision structure. Keeping the dates separate avoids treating an old advisory title as proof of current employment or procurement authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The July 2021 group roster included public regulators, researchers and civil-society participants alongside Wood. In May 2025 Reset Tech UK's replacement articles made directors company members; her significant-control notification uses 7 May as the date she became registrable. The constitutional voting rules and registered control bands still need reconciliation rather than conversion into an assumed ownership percentage.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-woodgroup",
              "w12-gov-e-wood-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Public register appoints5July2023; current constitution makes directors members. This is not a measured current ownership percentage or proof every record is up to date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-wood-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "listed as company director",
            "sourceName": "Poppy Wood",
            "targetName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "date": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "July2021professionalrole is a concreteadvisoryroute; laterResetUKdirectorship separate. No currentemployment,procurementvote,datacontrol or deploymentveto inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-woodgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was listed as Reset Tech Senior Advisor in the group",
            "sourceName": "Poppy Wood",
            "targetName": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "date": "2021-07-02"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
            "heading": "A direct Reset connection, with a defined remit",
            "text": "The roster includes Poppy Wood, then Senior Advisor at Reset Tech , alongside ICO technology-policy head Ali Shah, Ofcom technology-policy lead Fred Langford, NSPCC policy head Andy Burrows, Open Data Institute programme lead Jack Hardinges, BBC product manager Jon Howard, Web Foundation adviser Azmina Dhrodia, Bristol researchers Asma Vranaki and Claudia Peersman, and Oxford researcher Jun Zhao. Roles are as listed in July2021, not claims about current employment. Poppy Wood's later Reset UK directorship/member-control records are separate dated relationships already in the case.",
            "matched": [
              "Poppy Wood"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9c126515f2660db17f57870b04acdcefe7cae1ebe83a24ceb98f0c58947ee3e5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights",
            "heading": "Instruments and reading scope",
            "text": "Companies House filing history records articles and adoption resolution filed21May2025. The resolution is headed7May2025 and replaces the previous articles immediately; it bears Dale Benjamin Scott's agreement as the voting member. Poppy Wood's PSC notification, filed19May2025, gives7May2025 as the date she became registrable. The resolution is evidence of this adoption decision, not a permanent personal veto. Its signature date is printed5/7/2025 alongside the explicit7May heading; do not reinterpret it as a later July action. A separate source anomaly is that its header prints company number4982650 while the official docket and attached articles identify14982650. Retain this discrepancy rather than silently correcting a quotation or inventing another company.",
            "matched": [
              "Poppy Wood"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ae2506b21bf1dd3535c135173bffcc1f0efd2f6d507aaf5872a90de5813f7e0d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-uk-constitutional-limits",
      "label": "Reset UK entrenched purposes and conflict rules",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Certain amendments require member unanimity. Conflicts require declaration but permit specified participation, including connected Group Company matters, subject to exceptions and exclusions. Not proof rules exercised.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Constitutional rule"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-uk-constitutional-limits",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-uk-constitutional-limits",
        "name": "Reset UK entrenched purposes and conflict rules",
        "role": "Constitutional rule",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Certain amendments require member unanimity. Conflicts require declaration but permit specified participation, including connected Group Company matters, subject to exceptions and exclusions. Not proof rules exercised.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Certain amendments require member unanimity. Conflicts require declaration but permit specified participation, including connected Group Company matters, subject to exceptions and exclusions. Not proof rules exercised."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Certain amendments require member unanimity. Conflicts require declaration but permit specified participation, including connected Group Company matters, subject to exceptions and exclusions. Not proof rules exercised.",
        "structuralRole": "Constitutional rule",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article8 covers purposes, asset lock, winding-up and entrenchment; other special written resolutions75%. Directors are members, each has one written vote. These thresholds are not a finding of present50/50 control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-uk-member-limits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must obtain member unanimity for specified entrenched amendments",
            "sourceName": "Reset UK director-member decision body",
            "targetName": "Reset UK entrenched purposes and conflict rules",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-reset-action-ggmbh",
      "label": "Reset Tech Action gGmbH — named debtor",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "2024 UK accounts name this entity as owingGBP1,156. Do not silently identify its legal registration with similarly spelled Action GmbH in constitutional list; no parent control inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-reset-action-ggmbh",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-reset-action-ggmbh",
        "name": "Reset Tech Action gGmbH — named debtor",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2024 UK accounts name this entity as owingGBP1,156. Do not silently identify its legal registration with similarly spelled Action GmbH in constitutional list; no parent control inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 UK accounts name this entity as owingGBP1,156. Do not silently identify its legal registration with similarly spelled Action GmbH in constitutional list; no parent control inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2024 UK accounts name this entity as owingGBP1,156. Do not silently identify its legal registration with similarly spelled Action GmbH in constitutional list; no parent control inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GBP1,156 owed to UK company at2024 year end, a balance not observed cash transfer. Legal registration and identity with similarly named constitutional entity unverified. Whole-company amounts are not network budget. Financial details: value: 1,156; currency: GBP; kind: reported receivable stock; period: 2024-12-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-action-receivable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "UK accounts report year-end amount receivable from named entity",
            "sourceName": "Reset Tech Action gGmbH — named debtor",
            "targetName": "Reset Tech UK Limited",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records",
            "heading": "What the 2024 accounts expose and leave unresolved",
            "text": "Year-end cash is GBP 40,997 in HSBC UK accounts. This identifies a banking relationship, not bank direction over advocacy. Note 7 puts GBP 1,156 receivable from Reset Tech Action gGmbH and GBP 10,743 directors' loan under debtors. The latter is owed to the company, not a director's funding contribution; individual identity and terms are not disclosed there. The named intercompany receivable is a concrete accounting relation, but does not identify all group transactions or establish parent control.",
            "matched": [
              "Reset Tech Action gGmbH"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "51528ffd4773c2725237eed0786c25a5edf92dd3e332bf94f34f83cbe6c2ba81"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
            "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-mann-members",
      "label": "Mannifera collective decision process",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Historical guide: EO assesses, member panel shortlists, Taskforce endorses, members reach consensus at Muster.2023 timetable not proven execution of special2024 round.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-mann-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-mann-members",
        "name": "Mannifera collective decision process",
        "role": "Governance role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Historical guide: EO assesses, member panel shortlists, Taskforce endorses, members reach consensus at Muster.2023 timetable not proven execution of special2024 round.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical guide: EO assesses, member panel shortlists, Taskforce endorses, members reach consensus at Muster.2023 timetable not proven execution of special2024 round."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Historical guide: EO assesses, member panel shortlists, Taskforce endorses, members reach consensus at Muster.2023 timetable not proven execution of special2024 round.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "EO assesses, up to six members shortlist, Taskforce endorses, voting members reach consensus at Muster. Explicit2023 timetable; not established execution of2024 special round or automatic recusal. Current Board terminology is not backdated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-member-selection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
                "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published historical process selects projects by staged consensus",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera collective decision process",
            "targetName": "Mannifera",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY24 report names Jemima Myer representative and board member. No proof of her specific HRLC/Reset vote, veto, appointment right or current tenure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-myer-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
                "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Myer Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names foundation representative as Mannifera board member",
            "sourceName": "The Myer Foundation",
            "targetName": "Mannifera collective decision process",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-myer",
      "label": "The Myer Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "FY24 report discloses earlier three-year Mannifera membership award and representative/board role. Not each member paid the current minimum or an HRLC earmark.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-myer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-myer",
        "name": "The Myer Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "FY24 report discloses earlier three-year Mannifera membership award and representative/board role. Not each member paid the current minimum or an HRLC earmark.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FY24 report discloses earlier three-year Mannifera membership award and representative/board role. Not each member paid the current minimum or an HRLC earmark."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Myer Foundation appears here as a philanthropic participant in Mannifera. Its FY2024 annual report records an earlier three-year membership award and identifies a foundation representative who also served on Mannifera's board, connecting financial support with a documented representation route.",
        "structuralRole": "Foundation member contributing resources and representation to a philanthropic collective",
        "significance": "A collective's grant-making capacity depends on both pooled support and the people participating in its governance. Myer's report exposes those two mechanisms separately. It helps distinguish an institution's general membership commitment from an earmarked grant to a particular policy recipient.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The report records $165,000 approved in FY2022 for membership labelled 2021–24, with no new commitment shown in that row for FY2024. The inspected passage does not specify a currency code. It names Jemima Myer as the foundation's representative and a Mannifera board member. Neither record identifies her vote on HRLC or Reset funding, and a later minimum membership contribution cannot be applied retrospectively.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
                "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-myer-membership",
              "w12-gov-e-myer-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "165,000 approvedFY2022, labelled membership2021-24, dash for commitment fromFY24. Not newFY24 cash. Separate5,000/9,100 entries not added here; current65,000 minimum not retroactively applied. Financial details: value: 165,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported earlier membership award; period: 2021-2024; approvedFY2022",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-myer-membership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
                "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reports historical three-year membership award",
            "sourceName": "The Myer Foundation",
            "targetName": "Mannifera",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY24 report names Jemima Myer representative and board member. No proof of her specific HRLC/Reset vote, veto, appointment right or current tenure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-myer-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
                "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera collective decision process",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names foundation representative as Mannifera board member",
            "sourceName": "The Myer Foundation",
            "targetName": "Mannifera collective decision process",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-rights-first",
      "label": "Rights-First —4October2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "David Mejia-Canales authored framework acknowledging Mannifera. Human-rights constraints accompany duty/regulator proposals. Author disclaimer prevents attribution to every supporter; exact grant allocation unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-rights-first",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-rights-first",
        "name": "Rights-First —4October2024",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "David Mejia-Canales authored framework acknowledging Mannifera. Human-rights constraints accompany duty/regulator proposals. Author disclaimer prevents attribution to every supporter; exact grant allocation unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "David Mejia-Canales authored framework acknowledging Mannifera. Human-rights constraints accompany duty/regulator proposals. Author disclaimer prevents attribution to every supporter; exact grant allocation unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation is a report dated 4 October 2024, authored by David Mejia-Canales and launched by the Human Rights Law Centre. It sets human-rights constraints alongside proposals for a duty of care, regulatory oversight and accountability.",
        "structuralRole": "Rights-based design proposal with an acknowledged philanthropic support route",
        "significance": "The report ties stronger regulation to procedural protections for people affected by platform decisions. Its role is therefore broader than demanding restrictions: reasons, remedies and review are part of the proposed machinery. The acknowledgment also connects a named output to Mannifera support without assigning the donor every argument.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The report acknowledges Mannifera grant support, but does not identify the amount allocated to this output. HRLC's 7 October launch advocated an independent regulator, a duty of care, rights assessment and penalties. The report develops safeguards around explanation, remedies and review. Its author disclaimer distinguishes the author's views from those of HRLC, affiliates and supporters, so acknowledgment of assistance is not an endorsement register.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mann-rights-first",
              "w12-gov-e-mejia-authorship",
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-launch",
              "w13-disp-e-rights-safeguards"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "7October launch advocates independent regulator, duty, rights assessment and penalties. Institutional advocacy is distinct from attributing every report line to donor/consultees; proposals not government adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "launches related institutional regulatory recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "date": "2024-10-07 – 2024-10-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report distinguishes author views from HRLC, affiliates and supporters. Assistance/attendance acknowledgments are not an endorsement register.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mejia-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David Mejia-Canales",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as report author",
            "sourceName": "David Mejia-Canales",
            "targetName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "date": "2024-10-04 – 2024-10-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF12/printed22-23 andPDF15/printed28-29. Read alongside report regulatory proposals; no donor editorial approval implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-rights-safeguards"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rights-First reasons, remedies and review",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets out reasons, remedy and review safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "targetName": "Rights-First reasons, remedies and review",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Acknowledgment establishes support for output; no grant number/amount or allocation of the entire60,000 award. Do not infer donor endorsement or editorial approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mann-rights-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mannifera",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publication acknowledges grant support",
            "sourceName": "Mannifera",
            "targetName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "date": "Report dated4October2024; award/payment timing unspecified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-mejia",
      "label": "David Mejia-Canales",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Rights-First author; HRLC reports parliamentary representation. No governmental adoption or donor approval inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-mejia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-mejia",
        "name": "David Mejia-Canales",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Rights-First author; HRLC reports parliamentary representation. No governmental adoption or donor approval inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Rights-First author; HRLC reports parliamentary representation. No governmental adoption or donor approval inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "David Mejia-Canales is the credited author of Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation, dated 4 October 2024. The Human Rights Law Centre also identifies him as its representative in a public account of parliamentary engagement around digital-platform regulation.",
        "structuralRole": "Author carrying a rights-based regulatory framework into parliamentary advocacy",
        "significance": "The authorship and representation records connect production of a policy argument with an institutional route for presenting it. They allow the reader to follow who articulated the framework and where it was promoted, while keeping the report's authorial position separate from the views of its supporters.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "Rights-First acknowledges Mannifera support and contains an express distinction between the author's views and those of HRLC, affiliates and supporters. HRLC's separate engagement account names Mejia-Canales as a representative. That records advocacy activity; it does not identify a governmental advisory appointment or establish adoption of the report's proposed powers and safeguards.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mejia-authorship",
              "w12-gov-e-author-parliament"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report distinguishes author views from HRLC, affiliates and supporters. Assistance/attendance acknowledgments are not an endorsement register.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mejia-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as report author",
            "sourceName": "David Mejia-Canales",
            "targetName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "date": "2024-10-04 – 2024-10-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Attributed representation, not formal government advisory appointment or evidence of decision authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-author-parliament"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named representative in HRLC engagement account",
            "sourceName": "David Mejia-Canales",
            "targetName": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
      "label": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "HRLC account reports Parliament House/government engagement. Displayed8October2024 differs fromURL2025 string; official minutes and exact adopted wording not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
        "name": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
        "role": "Reported event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "HRLC account reports Parliament House/government engagement. Displayed8October2024 differs fromURL2025 string; official minutes and exact adopted wording not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "HRLC account reports Parliament House/government engagement. Displayed8October2024 differs fromURL2025 string; official minutes and exact adopted wording not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "HRLC account reports Parliament House/government engagement. Displayed8October2024 differs fromURL2025 string; official minutes and exact adopted wording not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Displayed8October2024 account identifies Mejia-Canales representing HRLC. No independent meeting minutes or accepted wording; URL year differs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-hrlc-parliament"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports taking framework to Parliament and government",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
            "date": "Displayed8October2024; exact meeting date not independently established"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Attributed representation, not formal government advisory appointment or evidence of decision authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-author-parliament"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David Mejia-Canales",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named representative in HRLC engagement account",
            "sourceName": "David Mejia-Canales",
            "targetName": "HRLC parliamentary engagement — reportedOctober2024",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
      "label": "Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "ABN28 739100711 discretionary investment trust/private ancillary fund. Exact corporate trustee name unresolved; group finance not Reset-specific money.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Trust"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
        "name": "Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
        "role": "Trust",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ABN28 739100711 discretionary investment trust/private ancillary fund. Exact corporate trustee name unresolved; group finance not Reset-specific money.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ABN28 739100711 discretionary investment trust/private ancillary fund. Exact corporate trustee name unresolved; group finance not Reset-specific money."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation is the Australian registration label attached to ABN 28 739 100 711, a discretionary investment trust and private ancillary fund. McKinnon's funding page distinguishes it from the research entity within the broader organization; the exact corporate trustee name remains unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropic funding vehicle distinct from the research recipient",
        "significance": "Separating the trust from the research centre makes the direction and basis of money flows intelligible. The same reported donation appears on both sides of an intra-group relationship, so counting each report as a new award would double the amount. It also prevents broad foundation financing being mislabelled as a Reset project fee.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The FY2024 trust and Research Centre reports record one intra-group donation of $19,530,300, with no currency code specified in the inspected passages. The recipient was then the Susan McKinnon Research Centre. The public organization listing does not identify which entity signed a Reset commission or allocate any part of this donation to that work.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
              },
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-trust",
              "w12-gov-e-trust-research-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "19,530,300 reported by trust and Research Centre as same donation, not two awards, Reset fee or complete cash reconciliation. Dollar code unspecified in inspected passages; centre also supplies services at cost. Financial details: value: 19,530,300; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported intragroup donation; period: FY2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-trust-research-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "both entity reports record one FY2024 intra-group donation",
            "sourceName": "Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "targetName": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-trust"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-research-centre",
      "label": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Historical entity ABN/ACN40 656129127 /656129127; now OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD from14April2026. Same identifier, no assignment or wind-up inferred. Committee route not yet tied to Reset contracts.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-research-centre",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-research-centre",
        "name": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Historical entity ABN/ACN40 656129127 /656129127; now OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD from14April2026. Same identifier, no assignment or wind-up inferred. Committee route not yet tied to Reset contracts.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical entity ABN/ACN40 656129127 /656129127; now OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD from14April2026. Same identifier, no assignment or wind-up inferred. Committee route not yet tied to Reset contracts."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd is the entity identified by ABN 40 656 129 127 and ACN 656129127. The Australian register records its name as OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD from 14 April 2026. Historical financial and research-governance records belong to that identifiable entity.",
        "structuralRole": "Research and funding vehicle whose historical name must follow its registration identity",
        "significance": "This entity separates the machinery supporting McKinnon research from the broader public-facing organization and its foundation trust. Its accounts provide a route into funding and oversight, while the name history prevents an ordinary rename being mistaken for a new recipient, asset assignment or winding-up.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The trust and Research Centre's FY2024 reports both record the same $19,530,300 intra-group donation; the inspected passages do not specify a currency code. The centre also supplied services at cost. Its historical Research Committee mandate covered applying research funds and publishing or disseminating results. These general powers are not yet tied to a particular Reset commission or approval decision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
              },
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-research",
              "w12-gov-e-trust-research-funding",
              "w12-gov-e-committee-oversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "19,530,300 reported by trust and Research Centre as same donation, not two awards, Reset fee or complete cash reconciliation. Dollar code unspecified in inspected passages; centre also supplies services at cost. Financial details: value: 19,530,300; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported intragroup donation; period: FY2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-trust-research-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "both entity reports record one FY2024 intra-group donation",
            "sourceName": "Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "targetName": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Historical report gives general Research Committee mandate. Membership, appointment rights, thresholds and any Reset-specific decision/clearance remain not obtained. One centre member reported, identity undisclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-committee-oversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Historical McKinnon Research Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "oversees application of research funds and publication/dissemination",
            "sourceName": "Historical McKinnon Research Committee",
            "targetName": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-research"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-charitable-foundation",
      "label": "Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "ABN12 653756597, distinct from trust and Research Centre. Current group listing/existence during2023-24 does not identify the Reset contract signatory.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-charitable-foundation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-charitable-foundation",
        "name": "Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ABN12 653756597, distinct from trust and Research Centre. Current group listing/existence during2023-24 does not identify the Reset contract signatory.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ABN12 653756597, distinct from trust and Research Centre. Current group listing/existence during2023-24 does not identify the Reset contract signatory."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ABN12 653756597, distinct from trust and Research Centre. Current group listing/existence during2023-24 does not identify the Reset contract signatory.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-charitable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
              },
              {
                "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
                "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-research-committee",
      "label": "Historical McKinnon Research Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Research Centre FY2024 report places research-fund application and publishing/dissemination under committee oversight. Members, appointment rules, vote thresholds and Reset-specific exercise unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-research-committee",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-research-committee",
        "name": "Historical McKinnon Research Committee",
        "role": "Governance role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Research Centre FY2024 report places research-fund application and publishing/dissemination under committee oversight. Members, appointment rules, vote thresholds and Reset-specific exercise unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Research Centre FY2024 report places research-fund application and publishing/dissemination under committee oversight. Members, appointment rules, vote thresholds and Reset-specific exercise unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Research Centre FY2024 report places research-fund application and publishing/dissemination under committee oversight. Members, appointment rules, vote thresholds and Reset-specific exercise unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Historical report gives general Research Committee mandate. Membership, appointment rights, thresholds and any Reset-specific decision/clearance remain not obtained. One centre member reported, identity undisclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-committee-oversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
                "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "oversees application of research funds and publication/dissemination",
            "sourceName": "Historical McKinnon Research Committee",
            "targetName": "Former Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-march-roundtable",
      "label": "Reset transparency roundtable —March2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Twenty academic/civil-society experts; Chatham House Rule. April briefing reports process. Attendance/contribution expressly not endorsement; roster not expanded here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-march-roundtable",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-march-roundtable",
        "name": "Reset transparency roundtable —March2024",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Twenty academic/civil-society experts; Chatham House Rule. April briefing reports process. Attendance/contribution expressly not endorsement; roster not expanded here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Twenty academic/civil-society experts; Chatham House Rule. April briefing reports process. Attendance/contribution expressly not endorsement; roster not expanded here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Twenty academic/civil-society experts; Chatham House Rule. April briefing reports process. Attendance/contribution expressly not endorsement; roster not expanded here.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Twenty experts, March2024, Chatham House Rule; observed account of convening, not a signed common position. No participant roster or all-to-all collaboration edges fabricated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-reset-convening"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "briefing reports convening academic and civil-society experts",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset transparency roundtable —March2024",
            "date": "March2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "April briefing translates discussion while disclaiming attendance as endorsement. No proof every participant approved final wording or that government accepted it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-convening-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "discussion informs published regulatory recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Reset transparency roundtable —March2024",
            "targetName": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
            "date": "March discussion;April2024 briefing"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-april-briefing",
      "label": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Briefing translates March discussion into recommendations and credits McKinnon support. Reset owns errors/omissions; no new independent commission/payment inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w12-gov-april-briefing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-april-briefing",
        "name": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Briefing translates March discussion into recommendations and credits McKinnon support. Reset owns errors/omissions; no new independent commission/payment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Briefing translates March discussion into recommendations and credits McKinnon support. Reset owns errors/omissions; no new independent commission/payment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "governance",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Briefing translates March discussion into recommendations and credits McKinnon support. Reset owns errors/omissions; no new independent commission/payment inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Amount/form unknown. Not automatically one of the two separate named commissions or a fresh additional payment. Recipient retains errors/omissions responsibility; attendance not endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-briefing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "briefing acknowledges support",
            "sourceName": "McKinnon — named research commissioner",
            "targetName": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
            "date": "BriefingApril2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "April briefing translates discussion while disclaiming attendance as endorsement. No proof every participant approved final wording or that government accepted it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w12-gov-e-convening-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset transparency roundtable —March2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "discussion informs published regulatory recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Reset transparency roundtable —March2024",
            "targetName": "Regulating for Transparency —April2024",
            "date": "March discussion;April2024 briefing"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
            "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
      "label": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Dated response with civil-inference and search-risk proposals. Maeve Walsh is contact; not proof she wrote every passage.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-osan-feb",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
        "name": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Dated response with civil-inference and search-risk proposals. Maeve Walsh is contact; not proof she wrote every passage.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated response with civil-inference and search-risk proposals. Maeve Walsh is contact; not proof she wrote every passage."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Dated response with civil-inference and search-risk proposals. Maeve Walsh is contact; not proof she wrote every passage.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Internal date February2024; consultation openingNovember2023 and later listing date do not date the response. Exact day not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-network-feb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted identified illegal-harms consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "date": "February2024 internal document date"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF25-26: offense-sensitive argument, including contrasting examples. Do not generalize to a ban on all speech without benefit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-feb-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed contextual civil interpretation",
            "sourceName": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "targetName": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF97 identifies thumbnails/click-through and direct/indirect harmful routes. Exact proposal context retained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-feb-search"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Search risk and obligations mismatch concern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "raised mismatch in risk discussion and search measures",
            "sourceName": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "targetName": "Search risk and obligations mismatch concern",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
      "label": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "OSAN argues wider context and civil balance of probabilities. Cyberflashing example contrasts suicide-offence difficulties; not a general test that unbeneficial speech is illegal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-civil-inference",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
        "name": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "OSAN argues wider context and civil balance of probabilities. Cyberflashing example contrasts suicide-offence difficulties; not a general test that unbeneficial speech is illegal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "OSAN argues wider context and civil balance of probabilities. Cyberflashing example contrasts suicide-offence difficulties; not a general test that unbeneficial speech is illegal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the Online Safety Act Network's proposed approach to assessing illegal content under the UK's civil regulatory regime. In February 2024 it argued for contextual interpretation and a civil balance-of-probabilities approach, with Lorna Woods separately explaining the argument in public commentary.",
        "structuralRole": "Contested interpretation of the threshold for treating content as illegal",
        "significance": "The dispute concerns how platforms infer the elements of an offence when applying safety duties. That threshold affects both enforcement reach and expression: changing the evidential approach can change which material is restricted even when Parliament has not created a new offence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Argument and regulatory disposition",
            "text": "The network's examples distinguished cyberflashing from difficulties around suicide offences; they were offence-specific reasoning, rather than a general rule against speech lacking social benefit. Ofcom's December 2024 decision declined the proposed interpretive departure. It retained reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements, using context and considering expression costs, while agreeing that criminal proof beyond reasonable doubt was not the applicable test.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-feb-inference",
              "w13-disp-e-woods-inference",
              "w13-disp-e-ofcom-declines-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Volume3 2.19/fn11 identifies OSAN25-26;2.20-21 retains reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements and context-sensitive judgment, citing expression costs. It agrees criminal beyond-reasonable-doubt is not the test; this is no court judgment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-ofcom-declines-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined proposed interpretive departure",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "date": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named article15February2024 under Burden of Proof in a Civil Regime; intellectual contribution, not regulatory appointment or sole authorship of network response.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-woods-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
                "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lorna Woods",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publicly argued contextual civil approach",
            "sourceName": "Lorna Woods",
            "targetName": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF25-26: offense-sensitive argument, including contrasting examples. Do not generalize to a ban on all speech without benefit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-feb-inference"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed contextual civil interpretation",
            "sourceName": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "targetName": "Proposed contextual civil-inference approach",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-search-risk",
      "label": "Search risk and obligations mismatch concern",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "OSAN p97 raises direct and indirect routes and risk/measure fit. Ofcom reports a risk-register amendment while retaining statutory search-content limits.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-search-risk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-search-risk",
        "name": "Search risk and obligations mismatch concern",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "OSAN p97 raises direct and indirect routes and risk/measure fit. Ofcom reports a risk-register amendment while retaining statutory search-content limits.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "OSAN p97 raises direct and indirect routes and risk/measure fit. Ofcom reports a risk-register amendment while retaining statutory search-content limits."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "OSAN p97 raises direct and indirect routes and risk/measure fit. Ofcom reports a risk-register amendment while retaining statutory search-content limits.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF97 identifies thumbnails/click-through and direct/indirect harmful routes. Exact proposal context retained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-feb-search"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "raised mismatch in risk discussion and search measures",
            "sourceName": "OSAN February2024 illegal-harms response",
            "targetName": "Search risk and obligations mismatch concern",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Annex1 A1.9.9-10/fn486-487 credits OSAN concern and reports amended24.13 plus risks24.10-14. Search content remains results/first interaction, excluding subsequent interactions. Final register not independently diffed; no new unlimited downstream liability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-ofcom-search-amendment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports amending risk register while retaining statutory limit",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Search risk and obligations mismatch concern",
            "date": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-osan-july",
      "label": "OSAN July2024 children response",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Names Woods and Maeve Walsh. Issue8 criticises age gates without service design change, seeks evidence/metrics and supports not selecting one tool; exact accepted minimum-age clause unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-osan-july",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-osan-july",
        "name": "OSAN July2024 children response",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Names Woods and Maeve Walsh. Issue8 criticises age gates without service design change, seeks evidence/metrics and supports not selecting one tool; exact accepted minimum-age clause unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Names Woods and Maeve Walsh. Issue8 criticises age gates without service design change, seeks evidence/metrics and supports not selecting one tool; exact accepted minimum-age clause unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Names Woods and Maeve Walsh. Issue8 criticises age gates without service design change, seeks evidence/metrics and supports not selecting one tool; exact accepted minimum-age clause unestablished.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Cover names Woods/Walsh;July2024 document date. Issue8 is differentiated design/assurance advocacy, not uncomplicated universal identification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-network-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published named children-consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "date": "July2024 internal document date"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-walsh-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Maeve Walsh",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as co-author",
            "sourceName": "Maeve Walsh",
            "targetName": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "date": "July2024 response"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-maeve-walsh",
      "label": "Maeve Walsh",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named co-author of OSAN July2024 children response and contact on February response. No formal Ofcom appointment established in this bounded pass; unrelated Siobhan Walsh is not this person.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-maeve-walsh",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-maeve-walsh",
        "name": "Maeve Walsh",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named co-author of OSAN July2024 children response and contact on February response. No formal Ofcom appointment established in this bounded pass; unrelated Siobhan Walsh is not this person.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named co-author of OSAN July2024 children response and contact on February response. No formal Ofcom appointment established in this bounded pass; unrelated Siobhan Walsh is not this person."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Maeve Walsh is a named contributor to the Online Safety Act Network's UK regulatory submissions. She appears as the contact on its February 2024 illegal-harms response and as a co-author, with Lorna Woods, of its July 2024 response on protecting children.",
        "structuralRole": "Named author and contact for consultation advocacy",
        "significance": "Her documented role helps identify the people producing the network's arguments, giving a collective submission a traceable human authorship. It also distinguishes the work of preparing and presenting regulatory advice from the statutory authority to decide what Ofcom adopts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented contribution",
            "text": "The July response names Walsh on its cover. Its proposals address children's safety through differentiated design and assurance arguments. The retained records establish her contribution to the submission process; they do not identify a formal Ofcom appointment or give her a regulatory approval right.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-walsh-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-walsh-july"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named as co-author",
            "sourceName": "Maeve Walsh",
            "targetName": "OSAN July2024 children response",
            "date": "July2024 response"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions",
            "heading": "Authority and chronology boundaries for integration",
            "text": "The network is a submitter and advocate in these records. Woods and Walsh are named authors of the July response, not thereby statutory committee members or holders of regulatory approval rights. Targeted Ofcom searches did not establish a formal appointment for either; an unrelated result names Siobhan Walsh , not Maeve Walsh. This pass makes no claim that no formal role exists anywhere.",
            "matched": [
              "Maeve Walsh",
              "Walsh"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "65370ddeec931a16483955a63dd229dedd4689e67abdb43f1fe5e104f4e68ff6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
            "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
            "heading": "Succession and Reset support",
            "text": "Carnegie's26October2023 transition statement says its programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through the new Online Safety Act Network, supported by former partner Reset. The2023 report independently says Carnegie supported development of the new network. This establishes deliberate succession of expertise and convening work after enactment, not ownership of the network or transfer of every employee/asset.",
            "matched": [
              "Walsh"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fe9456cb4c3da9b90e571a914523e681b12c1f5704f7082b8c4d7d4481f21316"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
      "label": "Children risk-assessment age assumptions",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "April2025 clarification: terms-of-service minimums/self-declaration insufficient evidence. Without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely younger users. Not itself a universal age gate or ID-document mandate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Guidance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
        "name": "Children risk-assessment age assumptions",
        "role": "Guidance",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "April2025 clarification: terms-of-service minimums/self-declaration insufficient evidence. Without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely younger users. Not itself a universal age gate or ID-document mandate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "April2025 clarification: terms-of-service minimums/self-declaration insufficient evidence. Without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely younger users. Not itself a universal age gate or ID-document mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "April2025 clarification: terms-of-service minimums/self-declaration insufficient evidence. Without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely younger users. Not itself a universal age gate or ID-document mandate.",
        "structuralRole": "Guidance",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "8.170-8.171 PDF36-37: self-declaration/TOS minimum insufficient; without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely presence/ages. Described as minor drafting changes, not a general new ID duty.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-ofcom-age-clarification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published clarified risk-assessment assumptions",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Children risk-assessment age assumptions",
            "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SLSC25th Report23 records Ofcom collective attribution including OSAN and denies preferential weighting. Exact proposed clause not identified;July inspected section lacks exact formulation. Report24 records dissatisfaction;26 declines adjudication.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-osan-credited-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
              },
              {
                "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Network",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Ofcom credits network among contributing civil-society feedback",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Network",
            "targetName": "Children risk-assessment age assumptions",
            "date": "Clarification24April2025; attribution published15May2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
            "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
      "label": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Expressly recommends Reset model and uses WEF2023 typology; requests research and civil-society access. Submitted advocacy is distinct from government adoption.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-hrlc155",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
        "name": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Expressly recommends Reset model and uses WEF2023 typology; requests research and civil-society access. Submitted advocacy is distinct from government adoption.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Expressly recommends Reset model and uses WEF2023 typology; requests research and civil-society access. Submitted advocacy is distinct from government adoption."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Human Rights Law Centre's submission dated 5 July 2024 is a formal contribution to Australia's Online Safety Act review. It combines a harm-classification framework, endorsement of a systems-based regulatory model and a request for access to platform data for public-interest scrutiny.",
        "structuralRole": "Rights advocacy connecting named policy models to an official consultation",
        "significance": "This submission provides a concrete transmission route: it names both Reset's model and the WEF typology, rather than merely resembling them. Its researcher-access proposal also creates a useful comparison with later drafting, because civil-society organizations sought direct eligibility that the university-based exposure draft did not give them.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The submitted package",
            "text": "The document expressly recommends Reset's April 2024 Five Pillars approach and uses the WEF's 2023 typology in its discussion of harm. Its access proposal covers vetted researchers and civil-society organizations. Publication on the department's website establishes that these arguments entered the consultation record; the later government response addresses review recommendations, so its positions cannot automatically be read as accepting this entire submission.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-submission",
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-reset-endorsement",
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-taxonomy",
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-civil-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-reset-endorsement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly recommends government adopt Reset risk-based model",
            "sourceName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "targetName": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "date": "5July2024 document"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section4.3 PDF9/fn15-18. HRLC use only; external original awaits separate integration. Do not invent an edge to statutory adoption or assume taxonomy itself dictates a ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-taxonomy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly adopts typology as harm framework",
            "sourceName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document dated5July2024. Exact receipt day not established; publication on departmental host is not government endorsement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-submission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued review submission",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "targetName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "date": "Document date5July2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section5.1.4 PDF11 requests broader direct eligibility than later205B. Do not convert advocacy into granted access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-civil-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests access for vetted researchers and civil-society organizations",
            "sourceName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "targetName": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
      "label": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "April2024 Green Paper proposes duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability across broader harms. Cites EU/UK/Canadian comparators and frames proposals as contribution to debate. HRLC expressly endorses it; no evidence HRLC mediated reviewer citation of separate Reset submission70.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
        "name": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "April2024 Green Paper proposes duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability across broader harms. Cites EU/UK/Canadian comparators and frames proposals as contribution to debate. HRLC expressly endorses it; no evidence HRLC mediated reviewer citation of separate Reset submission70.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "April2024 Green Paper proposes duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability across broader harms. Cites EU/UK/Canadian comparators and frames proposals as contribution to debate. HRLC expressly endorses it; no evidence HRLC mediated reviewer citation of separate Reset submission70."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reset.Tech Australia's April 2024 Green Paper proposes a five-part model for regulating digital platforms: a duty of care, risk assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability. It compares European Union, UK and Canadian approaches and presents its framework as a contribution to reform debate.",
        "structuralRole": "Reusable regulatory architecture endorsed by another advocacy organization",
        "significance": "The model turns many different harms into a common organizational process: assess risk, change systems, disclose information and answer for results. That makes it portable across jurisdictions and wider than a separate takedown duty for each content category. HRLC's explicit endorsement documents one route by which the package gained another institutional advocate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope and endorsement",
            "text": "The Green Paper's table spans existing online harms alongside scams, electoral and public-security concerns, rights, public health and environmental risks. The Human Rights Law Centre's July 2024 submission specifically recommended government adoption of the model. The Australian statutory review separately quoted Reset's own submission 70; HRLC's endorsement need not be treated as an intervening delivery step between Reset and the reviewer.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-model-scope",
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-reset-endorsement",
              "w13-disp-e-reset-model-attribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed6-7/PDF9 five-pillar table covers existing harms, scams, electoral/publicsecurity, rights, publichealth andenvironmental risks; comparesEU/UK/Canadian approaches. Moment-specific contribution to debate, not a sole WEF derivation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-model-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes broader risk model with named international comparators",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "date": "April2024 report; exact publication day unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-reset-endorsement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly recommends government adopt Reset risk-based model",
            "sourceName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "targetName": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "date": "5July2024 document"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recipient advocacy text names Reset and its Green Paper. This edge establishes attributed origin in HRLC submission, not new reading of the complete original or exclusive intellectual ancestry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-reset-model-attribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "HRLC explicitly attributes five-pillar model to Reset",
            "sourceName": "Reset.Tech Australia",
            "targetName": "Reset Five Pillars regulatory model",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "August2023 WEF coalition typology: contextual common language, not severity rating or regulatory compliance. Foreword/introduction scoped original text read; complete matrix/credits remain uninspected. Separately cited byApril2024 official issues paper, adopted byJuly HRLC advocacy and used in current eSafety education; none alone is statutory incorporation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "name": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "August2023 WEF coalition typology: contextual common language, not severity rating or regulatory compliance. Foreword/introduction scoped original text read; complete matrix/credits remain uninspected. Separately cited byApril2024 official issues paper, adopted byJuly HRLC advocacy and used in current eSafety education; none alone is statutory incorporation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "August2023 WEF coalition typology: contextual common language, not severity rating or regulatory compliance. Foreword/introduction scoped original text read; complete matrix/credits remain uninspected. Separately cited byApril2024 official issues paper, adopted byJuly HRLC advocacy and used in current eSafety education; none alone is statutory incorporation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published by the World Economic Forum in August 2023, the Typology of Online Harms supplies a shared vocabulary for discussing different forms of online harm. Its introduction presents a contextual classification tool, rather than a severity ranking or regulatory compliance standard.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared harm vocabulary circulating between coalition work, advocacy and official guidance",
        "significance": "Categories can influence policy before anyone writes a legal obligation: they shape the problems consultations ask about and the risks institutions describe. This document has identifiable routes into Australian discussion, making it possible to trace vocabulary transmission without assuming every later rule came from the same author.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Publication and subsequent use",
            "text": "The WEF publication is an output of its Global Coalition for Digital Safety. A participant account identifies Adam Hildreth and Julie Inman Grant as workstream co-chairs. Australia's April 2024 review issues paper cited the typology before the Human Rights Law Centre expressly adopted it in its July submission. eSafety also uses it in educational Safety by Design material. Those are three distinguishable uses—official discussion, advocacy and education—rather than evidence that the complete typology became Australian statute.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-published",
              "w14-tax-e-hildreth-cochair",
              "w14-tax-e-inman-cochair",
              "w14-tax-e-official-use",
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-taxonomy",
              "w14-tax-e-guidance-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "April2024 Part3/fn17 andabuse discussionsfn88/93. Predates HRLCJuly submission, establishing separate official citation route, not causal independence from all advocates or legislative incorporation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-official-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cites typology for descriptive harm framing",
            "sourceName": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "April2024; exact publication day unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Types of online harms section describes overlapping categories. Current page with lastupdated06/03/2026; initial use date unknown, not a statutory instrument or compulsory compliance matrix.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-guidance-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "explicitly uses typology for educational categories",
            "sourceName": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section4.3 PDF9/fn15-18. HRLC use only; external original awaits separate integration. Do not invent an edge to statutory adoption or assume taxonomy itself dictates a ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-taxonomy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly adopts typology as harm framework",
            "sourceName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Landing dates publication4August2023 and identifies Global Coalition for Digital Safety output. No contract, selection vote or exact final editorial approval established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Economic Forum",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes coalition typology",
            "sourceName": "World Economic Forum",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "2023-08-04 – 2023-08-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-bantourakis-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Minos Bantourakis",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
            "sourceName": "Minos Bantourakis",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-hildreth-cochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adam Hildreth",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hildreth",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolver says builds on CO:RE4Cs and follows actual2021 repository link. Earlier original unavailable; no claim all categories copied unchanged or title establishes full prior contents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-core-lineage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CO:RE4Cs research — attributed antecedent",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "participant account identifies prior research as antecedent",
            "sourceName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "targetName": "CO:RE4Cs research — attributed antecedent",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current SWGfL Recent Publications names2023 typology committee role. No voting threshold, particular definition or final editorial clearance identified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-hanna-drafting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "John-Orr Hanna",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "biography reports drafting-committee participation",
            "sourceName": "John-Orr Hanna",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-au-commitment",
      "label": "Government duty-of-care commitment —November2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Rowland13November speech grounds direction in received review and international alignment;14November release follows. Does not identify an NGO/funder as decision-maker.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-au-commitment",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-au-commitment",
        "name": "Government duty-of-care commitment —November2024",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Rowland13November speech grounds direction in received review and international alignment;14November release follows. Does not identify an NGO/funder as decision-maker.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Rowland13November speech grounds direction in received review and international alignment;14November release follows. Does not identify an NGO/funder as decision-maker."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rowland13November speech grounds direction in received review and international alignment;14November release follows. Does not identify an NGO/funder as decision-maker.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Speech13November2024 names recently received review and international alignment; release14November follows. Stable review node represents later published updated text, not identity of all wording withOctober delivery. No NGO/funder decision attribution in announcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-commitment-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
              },
              {
                "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ministerial announcement expressly grounds direction in received review",
            "sourceName": "Government duty-of-care commitment —November2024",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "Speech13November2024;release14November2024;review published4February2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-au-briefing",
      "label": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "FOI Document2 media table summarises HRLC and Reset public advocacy. Post-announcement official awareness, not proof of minister reading before decision.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-au-briefing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-au-briefing",
        "name": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
        "role": "Government record",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "FOI Document2 media table summarises HRLC and Reset public advocacy. Post-announcement official awareness, not proof of minister reading before decision.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FOI Document2 media table summarises HRLC and Reset public advocacy. Post-announcement official awareness, not proof of minister reading before decision."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FOI Document2 media table summarises HRLC and Reset public advocacy. Post-announcement official awareness, not proof of minister reading before decision.",
        "structuralRole": "Government record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-hrlc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
            "sourceName": "Department briefing cleared26November2024",
            "targetName": "Human Rights Law Centre",
            "date": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "label": "Government review response —April2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Published recommendation-by-recommendation support, qualification and non-support. Support of policy architecture is distinct from enacted law or adoption of every NGO proposal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-au-response",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "name": "Government review response —April2026",
        "role": "Government record",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published recommendation-by-recommendation support, qualification and non-support. Support of policy architecture is distinct from enacted law or adoption of every NGO proposal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published recommendation-by-recommendation support, qualification and non-support. Support of policy architecture is distinct from enacted law or adoption of every NGO proposal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australia's 14 April 2026 government response sets out which recommendations of the Online Safety Act review it supports, qualifies, leaves for consideration or declines. It is the government's published policy position between the independent review and subsequent legislative drafting.",
        "structuralRole": "Government selection and modification of the review's proposals",
        "significance": "The response is where a broad reform agenda becomes a set of government choices. Following those choices exposes both continuity and changes in institutional power: support for an overarching duty coexists with a preference for government-made rules subject to parliamentary scrutiny and rejection of a proposed licensing regime.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the government selected",
            "text": "The government supported recommendation 4's overarching duty and accessible internal complaints, supported researcher access in principle, and noted a possible digital ombudsman scheme. It declined automatically placing services reaching more than 10% of the population in the highest regulatory tier. It also declined mandatory local presence and the proposed licensing condition, while supporting an Australian contact point. These are distinct decisions: noting a proposal leaves consideration open, and supporting policy intent does not itself enact the recommended machinery.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec4",
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec7",
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec9",
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec13",
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec25",
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec26",
              "w15-impl-e-licence-rejected",
              "w15-impl-e-government-rec43",
              "w15-impl-e-government-rec44"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF3-6 intent/merit supported with alternatives/further implementation possible. Vulnerable people,crime,publicsafety alongside expression; complementsCriminalCode without altering existing discrimination obligations. Not acceptance of every proposed term.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-government-rec5"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation5 in principle",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Responsep5 rejects automatic highest tier above10% population coverage; p4 favors proportionate risk wherever present. Ten percent measures population coverage, not a penalty formula. Not an individually addressed NGO rejection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec7"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "does not support recommendation7: automatic highest tier",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Responsep5 support in principle; p4 describes government-made rules with parliamentary scrutiny instead of eSafety mandatory codes. Qualified implementation choice, not total rejection or exact NGO clause adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec9"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation9 in principle with altered rule-maker",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Governmentresponse printed10-11 explicitNot supported. Rejects this proposed permission-to-operate condition, not every other enforcement/restriction mechanism or all future vehicles.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-licence-rejected"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "does not support recommendation45 licensing proposal",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Responsep6 leaves safeguarded authorized-researcher implementation open. Not an NGO access award, vendor selection or payment. Later university boundary is separately compared.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation13 researcher access in principle",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed11-13 supports intent/merit with further proportionality and rights consideration. Does not establish acceptance of every mechanism, enacted duty or deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-government-phone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation48 in principle",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government responsep4 accepts overarching policy architecture. This is a disposition of reviewer recommendation, not full HRLC/Reset package acceptance or enactment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec4"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports review recommendation4: overarching duty",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Responsep9 says Note; p7 initially prioritizes internal dispute resolution. Note preserves further consideration and must not be relabeled rejected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-government-rec26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "notes recommendation26: digital Ombuds scheme",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
      "label": "Rights-First reasons, remedies and review",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Report seeks reasons for content/account restrictions, accessible remedies and review of significant regulatory decisions. Safeguards accompany its proposed regulatory powers.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
        "name": "Rights-First reasons, remedies and review",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Report seeks reasons for content/account restrictions, accessible remedies and review of significant regulatory decisions. Safeguards accompany its proposed regulatory powers.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report seeks reasons for content/account restrictions, accessible remedies and review of significant regulatory decisions. Safeguards accompany its proposed regulatory powers."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Report seeks reasons for content/account restrictions, accessible remedies and review of significant regulatory decisions. Safeguards accompany its proposed regulatory powers.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF12/printed22-23 andPDF15/printed28-29. Read alongside report regulatory proposals; no donor editorial approval implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-rights-safeguards"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets out reasons, remedy and review safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Rights-First —4October2024",
            "targetName": "Rights-First reasons, remedies and review",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "26F complaint processes apply to classes designated by eSafety with instrument-set requirements;25H weighs privacy. These clauses do not themselves establish universal explanation/restoration. Scoped text comparison, not identified government rejection or claim whole draft lacks safeguards.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-draft-safeguard-comparison"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
                "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "inspected clauses do not enact full proposed rights framework",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Rights-First reasons, remedies and review",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
            "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
      "label": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Submission155 p11 expressly includes vetted researchers and civil society organizations. September draft205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approvals.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
        "name": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Submission155 p11 expressly includes vetted researchers and civil society organizations. September draft205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approvals.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Submission155 p11 expressly includes vetted researchers and civil society organizations. September draft205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approvals."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "disposition",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Submission155 p11 expressly includes vetted researchers and civil society organizations. September draft205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approvals.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section5.1.4 PDF11 requests broader direct eligibility than later205B. Do not convert advocacy into granted access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-hrlc-civil-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests access for vetted researchers and civil-society organizations",
            "sourceName": "HRLC July2024 review submission155",
            "targetName": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Comparison:205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approval/ethics/public-interest requirements;205C delegates safeguards. No inferred motive, formal HRLC-specific rejection or bar on university collaboration. Existing draft/research role reused.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w13-disp-e-draft-narrows-hrlc-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "proposed university eligibility is narrower than HRLC direct-access request",
            "sourceName": "Approved Australian-university researchers",
            "targetName": "HRLC civil-society research-access request",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-hildreth",
      "label": "Adam Hildreth",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Resolver August2023 account describes Crisp founder and co-chair of typology workstream. Foreword signatory; exact2023 legal company/contract and commercial-control rights not established here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-hildreth",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-hildreth",
        "name": "Adam Hildreth",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Resolver August2023 account describes Crisp founder and co-chair of typology workstream. Foreword signatory; exact2023 legal company/contract and commercial-control rights not established here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Resolver August2023 account describes Crisp founder and co-chair of typology workstream. Foreword signatory; exact2023 legal company/contract and commercial-control rights not established here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
            "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Adam Hildreth is identified as Crisp's founder in a dated participant account of the WEF's 2023 online-harms typology. That account reports him as a workstream co-chair, and the original publication credits him as a foreword signatory. A 2022 Kroll announcement separately describes Crisp's acquisition.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial risk-intelligence founder contributing to a shared harm-classification publication",
        "significance": "Hildreth connects an industry perspective with a policy vocabulary used by other institutions. His named contribution is substantive enough to follow, but co-chairing and signing a foreword are different from writing every category, funding the document or possessing final authority over later regulatory uses.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated corporate and publication roles",
            "text": "Kroll's 31 May 2022 acquisition announcement said Hildreth would join its leadership. Resolver's 24 August 2023 account identifies him and Julie Inman Grant as co-chairs of the typology compilation workstream. The original foreword provides a separate publication credit. These historical records do not establish his current shareholding, the exact 2023 contracting company or a unilateral right to define regulatory categories.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
                "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-hildreth-brand",
              "w14-tax-e-hildreth-cochair",
              "w14-tax-e-hildreth-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-hildreth-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hildreth",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-hildreth-cochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hildreth",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "August2023 account identifies Crisp founder;2022 acquisition announcement says Hildreth would join leadership. Founder affiliation is not current shareholding or unilateral definition/contract authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-hildreth-brand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
                "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named founder in dated participant account",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hildreth",
            "targetName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "date": "Historical2022 announcement and2023 participant account"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
            "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-hanna",
      "label": "John-Orr Hanna",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Current SWGfL biography reports drafting-committee participation in2023 typology. Retrospective institutional account, not appointment instrument or final editorial authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-hanna",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-hanna",
        "name": "John-Orr Hanna",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current SWGfL biography reports drafting-committee participation in2023 typology. Retrospective institutional account, not appointment instrument or final editorial authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current SWGfL biography reports drafting-committee participation in2023 typology. Retrospective institutional account, not appointment instrument or final editorial authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "John-Orr Hanna is credited in SWGfL's biography with participation in the drafting committee for the 2023 online-harms typology. The source is a retrospective institutional account of his publication work.",
        "structuralRole": "Named drafting-committee participant in production of a shared taxonomy",
        "significance": "Committee participation offers a more specific route into the production process than a general organizational affiliation. It identifies someone associated with developing the text, while the retained biography leaves the allocation of individual definitions and final decision rules unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope of the attribution",
            "text": "SWGfL's Recent Publications section names Hanna's committee role for the 2023 typology. The record supplies no appointment instrument, voting threshold, particular draft contribution or final clearance decision. It supports participation in the writing process, rather than sole authorship of the resulting categories.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-hanna-drafting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current SWGfL Recent Publications names2023 typology committee role. No voting threshold, particular definition or final editorial clearance identified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-hanna-drafting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "biography reports drafting-committee participation",
            "sourceName": "John-Orr Hanna",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-dobrygowski",
      "label": "Daniel Dobrygowski",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named WEF-affiliated foreword signatory on indexed originalp3. Foreword credit does not establish main-text authorship or a veto.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-dobrygowski",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-dobrygowski",
        "name": "Daniel Dobrygowski",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Named WEF-affiliated foreword signatory on indexed originalp3. Foreword credit does not establish main-text authorship or a veto.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named WEF-affiliated foreword signatory on indexed originalp3. Foreword credit does not establish main-text authorship or a veto."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Daniel Dobrygowski is a WEF-affiliated signatory of the foreword to the August 2023 Typology of Online Harms. The original document provides the retained attribution.",
        "structuralRole": "Named institutional contributor to the typology's framing",
        "significance": "A foreword identifies people lending an attributable voice to a publication's framing and purpose. It is a useful authorship relation, but a narrower one than authorship of the entire classification or authority over later uses by regulators and advocates.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Publication credit",
            "text": "The original typology names Dobrygowski on its foreword page. The record does not identify a particular category he drafted, a financing decision or a final editorial veto. His profile therefore follows that contribution without turning the publication credit into a regulatory appointment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-dobrygowski-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-dobrygowski-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
            "sourceName": "Daniel Dobrygowski",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-bantourakis",
      "label": "Minos Bantourakis",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named WEF-affiliated foreword signatory and launch-article coauthor. No final approval or government drafting right inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-bantourakis",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-bantourakis",
        "name": "Minos Bantourakis",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Named WEF-affiliated foreword signatory and launch-article coauthor. No final approval or government drafting right inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named WEF-affiliated foreword signatory and launch-article coauthor. No final approval or government drafting right inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF launch: common language for online harm",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/all/common-language-online-harm-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Minos Bantourakis is identified as a WEF-affiliated foreword signatory of the August 2023 online-harms typology and as a co-author of its launch article. These publication credits are the documented basis for his profile.",
        "structuralRole": "Contributor to the typology's framing and public explanation",
        "significance": "The two credits connect the formal publication with the explanation used to introduce it to a wider audience. That is a concrete communication role through which a policy vocabulary can spread, without implying authorship of every definition or control over its subsequent official use.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Attributed outputs",
            "text": "The original typology names Bantourakis among foreword signatories, while the WEF launch article presents the value of a common language for online harm. The retained record does not establish final approval authority, a government drafting role or a personal funding relationship.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF launch: common language for online harm",
                "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/all/common-language-online-harm-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-bantourakis-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-bantourakis-foreword"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
                "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
            "sourceName": "Minos Bantourakis",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF launch: common language for online harm",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/all/common-language-online-harm-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-core4cs",
      "label": "CO:RE4Cs research — attributed antecedent",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Resolver links2021 Livingstone et al research as typology antecedent. Earlier original blocked/unread; no category-by-category copying or complete authorship/acknowledgment audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-core4cs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-core4cs",
        "name": "CO:RE4Cs research — attributed antecedent",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Resolver links2021 Livingstone et al research as typology antecedent. Earlier original blocked/unread; no category-by-category copying or complete authorship/acknowledgment audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Resolver links2021 Livingstone et al research as typology antecedent. Earlier original blocked/unread; no category-by-category copying or complete authorship/acknowledgment audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Resolver links2021 Livingstone et al research as typology antecedent. Earlier original blocked/unread; no category-by-category copying or complete authorship/acknowledgment audit.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Resolver says builds on CO:RE4Cs and follows actual2021 repository link. Earlier original unavailable; no claim all categories copied unchanged or title establishes full prior contents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-core-lineage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "participant account identifies prior research as antecedent",
            "sourceName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "targetName": "CO:RE4Cs research — attributed antecedent",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-issues2024",
      "label": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Government discussion uses WEF typology atfn17,88,93 before HRLC July submission. Descriptive framing, not law or proof officials were independent of all advocates.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-issues2024",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-issues2024",
        "name": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Government discussion uses WEF typology atfn17,88,93 before HRLC July submission. Descriptive framing, not law or proof officials were independent of all advocates.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Government discussion uses WEF typology atfn17,88,93 before HRLC July submission. Descriptive framing, not law or proof officials were independent of all advocates."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Government discussion uses WEF typology atfn17,88,93 before HRLC July submission. Descriptive framing, not law or proof officials were independent of all advocates.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "April2024 Part3/fn17 andabuse discussionsfn88/93. Predates HRLCJuly submission, establishing separate official citation route, not causal independence from all advocates or legislative incorporation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-official-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cites typology for descriptive harm framing",
            "sourceName": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": "April2024; exact publication day unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
      "label": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Current Safety by Design page uses WEF typology for overlapping categories. Last-update display does not date initial adoption; industry education, not binding duty definitions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Guidance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
        "name": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
        "role": "Guidance",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current Safety by Design page uses WEF typology for overlapping categories. Last-update display does not date initial adoption; industry education, not binding duty definitions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current Safety by Design page uses WEF typology for overlapping categories. Last-update display does not date initial adoption; industry education, not binding duty definitions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current Safety by Design page uses WEF typology for overlapping categories. Last-update display does not date initial adoption; industry education, not binding duty definitions.",
        "structuralRole": "Guidance",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Types of online harms section describes overlapping categories. Current page with lastupdated06/03/2026; initial use date unknown, not a statutory instrument or compulsory compliance matrix.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-guidance-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "explicitly uses typology for educational categories",
            "sourceName": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
            "targetName": "WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Educational agency page separate from Commissioner workstream role, official review paper and proposed Australian legal categories. No vendor requirement identified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-esafety-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes industry Safety by Design guidance",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "eSafety harm categories — educational guidance",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-review-categories",
      "label": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Published updated reviewp56 proposes harm families and defers broader financial/societal/misinformation consolidation to other regimes or future review. Government supportsrec5 in principle.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-review-categories",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-review-categories",
        "name": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Published updated reviewp56 proposes harm families and defers broader financial/societal/misinformation consolidation to other regimes or future review. Government supportsrec5 in principle.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published updated reviewp56 proposes harm families and defers broader financial/societal/misinformation consolidation to other regimes or future review. Government supportsrec5 in principle."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published updated reviewp56 proposes harm families and defers broader financial/societal/misinformation consolidation to other regimes or future review. Government supportsrec5 in principle.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF3-6 intent/merit supported with alternatives/further implementation possible. Vulnerable people,crime,publicsafety alongside expression; complementsCriminalCode without altering existing discrimination obligations. Not acceptance of every proposed term.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-government-rec5"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government review response —April2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation5 in principle",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published updated reviewp56, not automatically identical text toOctober delivery. Prior source§5.5 separately cites Reset submission70; HRLC endorsement is not an intervening delivery step.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-review-rec5"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes harm families in recommendation5",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Review recommendation5 harm families",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-deferred-consolidation",
      "label": "Broader harm-regime consolidation deferred",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Reviewer considers broader harms compatible with duty model but within other existing/proposed regimes; possible future expanded commission. Deliberate scope choice, not rejection of WEF taxonomy or claim harms unreal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-deferred-consolidation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-deferred-consolidation",
        "name": "Broader harm-regime consolidation deferred",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Reviewer considers broader harms compatible with duty model but within other existing/proposed regimes; possible future expanded commission. Deliberate scope choice, not rejection of WEF taxonomy or claim harms unreal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reviewer considers broader harms compatible with duty model but within other existing/proposed regimes; possible future expanded commission. Deliberate scope choice, not rejection of WEF taxonomy or claim harms unreal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reviewer considers broader harms compatible with duty model but within other existing/proposed regimes; possible future expanded commission. Deliberate scope choice, not rejection of WEF taxonomy or claim harms unreal.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed56 adjoining discussion: financial,societal,misinformation harms compatible with duty model but already elsewhere; reform substantial. Not a named WEF rejection or blanket exemption from any Australian regulation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-review-defers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defers broader consolidation to other regimes or future review",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Broader harm-regime consolidation deferred",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
      "label": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Sections25B-D separate serious-harm, child andunder16 feature obligations. Addition thresholds differ for serious harm and child harm;25G feature additions lack express serious-harm threshold. Not enacted taxonomy incorporation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-draft-categories",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
        "name": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Sections25B-D separate serious-harm, child andunder16 feature obligations. Addition thresholds differ for serious harm and child harm;25G feature additions lack express serious-harm threshold. Not enacted taxonomy incorporation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Sections25B-D separate serious-harm, child andunder16 feature obligations. Addition thresholds differ for serious harm and child harm;25G feature additions lack express serious-harm threshold. Not enacted taxonomy incorporation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "These are the initial harm and feature categories, and the powers to add to them, in Australia's 8 September 2026 digital-duty-of-care exposure draft. Sections 25B–D distinguish serious harm, additional child protection and under-16 social-media features rather than using one undifferentiated category of online harm.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed boundary of the duty and the mechanism for later expansion",
        "significance": "Definitions determine which risks providers would have to address, while delegated additions determine how that scope might change without rewriting the whole framework. The different tests therefore matter as much as the initial list. Similar terminology alone cannot establish that the WEF typology supplied every legal concept.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Differing addition tests",
            "text": "For sections 25C and 25D, the minister would seek and consider eSafety advice, but serious-harm potential applies to the general category and child-harm potential to the child category. Section 25G's feature power has no express serious-harm threshold in that section. The initial list does not name a generic misinformation or democracy category. Earlier Australian harm tests existed in the 2021 Act, before the 2023 typology; the draft is not enacted incorporation of that taxonomy.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-draft-initial",
              "w14-tax-e-minister-additions",
              "w14-tax-e-earlier-law"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "25C(2),25D(2),27B require seeking/considering eSafety advice and serious-harm or child-harm potential respectively. Child test does not expressly require seriousness;25G feature power has no express serious-harm threshold in that section. Existing general delegation edges retained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-minister-additions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would add harm or feature categories under differing tests",
            "sourceName": "Australian communications minister — statutory role",
            "targetName": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "25B-D distinguish serious harm, additional child protection andunder16 social-media features. No generic misinformation/democracy label named; not an assurance none could intersect listed conduct or future additions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-draft-initial"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies initial harm and child/feature categories",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "As-made2021sections5-9/106 predate2023 typology. Similar legal concepts need not originate solely in it; comparison does not prove exact drafting lineage or equivalence of every threshold.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-earlier-law"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "As-made2021 Australian harm tests",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "provides earlier substantive harm-test comparator",
            "sourceName": "As-made2021 Australian harm tests",
            "targetName": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-draft-risk-scope",
      "label": "Draft foreseeable, combined and non-user risks",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Sections25E/26A extend assessment beyond named labels to reasonably foreseeable risks and combined/non-user harms. Absence of a general misinformation label does not settle all future scope.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-draft-risk-scope",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-draft-risk-scope",
        "name": "Draft foreseeable, combined and non-user risks",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Sections25E/26A extend assessment beyond named labels to reasonably foreseeable risks and combined/non-user harms. Absence of a general misinformation label does not settle all future scope.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Sections25E/26A extend assessment beyond named labels to reasonably foreseeable risks and combined/non-user harms. Absence of a general misinformation label does not settle all future scope."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sections25E/26A extend assessment beyond named labels to reasonably foreseeable risks and combined/non-user harms. Absence of a general misinformation label does not settle all future scope.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "25E/26A: named-category absence is insufficient to exhaust assessment scope. Context with existing25Hprivacy/practicability and26(7)private-consenting-adult duty exception; no blanket exclusion of lawful adult speech or all other powers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-draft-assessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would assess foreseeable risks including combined and non-user harms",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Draft foreseeable, combined and non-user risks",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-act2021",
      "label": "As-made2021 Australian harm tests",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Earlier Act already contains serious harm, targeted child/adult abuse, contextual merit/consent and classification tests. A competing antecedent to similarities; not proof each later clause copied it.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Law"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-act2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-act2021",
        "name": "As-made2021 Australian harm tests",
        "role": "Law",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Earlier Act already contains serious harm, targeted child/adult abuse, contextual merit/consent and classification tests. A competing antecedent to similarities; not proof each later clause copied it.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Earlier Act already contains serious harm, targeted child/adult abuse, contextual merit/consent and classification tests. A competing antecedent to similarities; not proof each later clause copied it."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Earlier Act already contains serious harm, targeted child/adult abuse, contextual merit/consent and classification tests. A competing antecedent to similarities; not proof each later clause copied it.",
        "structuralRole": "Law",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "As-made2021sections5-9/106 predate2023 typology. Similar legal concepts need not originate solely in it; comparison does not prove exact drafting lineage or equivalence of every threshold.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-earlier-law"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "provides earlier substantive harm-test comparator",
            "sourceName": "As-made2021 Australian harm tests",
            "targetName": "Draft initial categories and ministerial additions",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
            "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-review-version-brief",
      "label": "FOI review-version record — inconsistencies retained",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "PostOctober delivery revision brief,8November2024 departmental clearance. AttachmentC says68 recommendations, later response67; daily-action penalty and removal-notice penalty descriptions differ. No reconstructed total/deletion or signed minister acceptance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w14-tax-review-version-brief",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-review-version-brief",
        "name": "FOI review-version record — inconsistencies retained",
        "role": "Government record",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "PostOctober delivery revision brief,8November2024 departmental clearance. AttachmentC says68 recommendations, later response67; daily-action penalty and removal-notice penalty descriptions differ. No reconstructed total/deletion or signed minister acceptance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "PostOctober delivery revision brief,8November2024 departmental clearance. AttachmentC says68 recommendations, later response67; daily-action penalty and removal-notice penalty descriptions differ. No reconstructed total/deletion or signed minister acceptance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "taxonomy",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PostOctober delivery revision brief,8November2024 departmental clearance. AttachmentC says68 recommendations, later response67; daily-action penalty and removal-notice penalty descriptions differ. No reconstructed total/deletion or signed minister acceptance.",
        "structuralRole": "Government record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Document1/AttachmentC: request1November after31October delivery, brief cleared8November. Five additions/68 total, four said already in text; later public response says67. Intro daily duty-action penalty differs from itemg/newrec35 $10m company removal-notice maximum. No arithmetic-derived original total or identified deletion; no settled attachment date or signed minister acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w14-tax-e-version-callouts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records post-delivery changes with conflicting summaries",
            "sourceName": "FOI review-version record — inconsistencies retained",
            "targetName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "label": "Crisp commercial brand",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current policy identifies GroupLimited trading as Crisp;2024 announcement aligns brand under Resolver. Do not substitute this brand for each historical contracting entity.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Commercial brand"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
        "name": "Crisp commercial brand",
        "role": "Commercial brand",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Current policy identifies GroupLimited trading as Crisp;2024 announcement aligns brand under Resolver. Do not substitute this brand for each historical contracting entity.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current policy identifies GroupLimited trading as Crisp;2024 announcement aligns brand under Resolver. Do not substitute this brand for each historical contracting entity."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
            "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Crisp is a commercial risk-intelligence and moderation brand whose current privacy policy identifies Crisp Thinking Group Limited as the company trading under that name. Kroll announced acquiring Crisp in May 2022, and a March 2024 announcement described its operation under the Resolver banner.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial service identity spanning moderation, risk analysis and a changing corporate structure",
        "significance": "The brand links public descriptions of capabilities and government-held outputs, but legal accountability requires identifying the relevant company and contract. Its service model also separates customer-directed processing on client channels from a controller role for a crisis index, placing different decisions and data responsibilities in different hands.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Brand history and documented output",
            "text": "The 2024 Resolver announcement describes brand alignment, rather than independently establishing a new acquisition. The published privacy policy describes automation, escalation and challenge processes and says moderation follows customer instructions. Generic service terms require an order form or statement of work; they do not establish DSIT's particular configuration. In November 2025, the Information Commissioner's Office confirmed a Crisp-produced report was held concerning the week beginning 24 June 2024. That output has not been matched to a particular legal signer or the later payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
                "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
                "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
              },
              {
                "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-brand",
              "w15-impl-e-hildreth-brand",
              "w15-impl-e-brand-alignment",
              "w15-impl-e-service-instructions",
              "w15-impl-e-crisp-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
              "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
              "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Request concerns week beginning24June2024. Disclosure adjudicator inspected full report. Legal signer, exact reportdate, keywords and2025payment match unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-crisp-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ICO confirms supplier-produced report was held",
            "sourceName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current company/controller identity, not proof Group signed every historic sale or supplied each government report. Distinguishes brand from UK06442193.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-brand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
                "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "privacy policy identifies company trading as Crisp",
            "sourceName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "targetName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Published policy distinguishes processor on customer channels and controller for crisis index; automation, escalation and challenge described. Actual instructions/configuration and lawfulness not audited. Generic terms requireOrderForm/SOW; no DSIT-specific adoption implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-service-instructions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
                "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer-specified moderation instructions",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes moderation subject to customer instructions",
            "sourceName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Customer-specified moderation instructions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "August2023 account identifies Crisp founder;2022 acquisition announcement says Hildreth would join leadership. Founder affiliation is not current shareholding or unilateral definition/contract authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-hildreth-brand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
                "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adam Hildreth",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named founder in dated participant account",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hildreth",
            "targetName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "date": "Historical2022 announcement and2023 participant account"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Posted19March/body20March2024. Describes brand unification, not a new share acquisition; registry control chain kept separately.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-brand-alignment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announces operation under Resolver banner",
            "sourceName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "date": "Posted19March2024;body20March2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
            "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          },
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
      "label": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company05636614; current policy controller trading as Crisp. Register identifies changing Kroll corporate controllers. Not automatically every historic contract signer.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-crisp-group",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
        "name": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company05636614; current policy controller trading as Crisp. Register identifies changing Kroll corporate controllers. Not automatically every historic contract signer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company05636614; current policy controller trading as Crisp. Register identifies changing Kroll corporate controllers. Not automatically every historic contract signer."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited, company 05636614, is the company identified in the current privacy policy as trading as Crisp. Registry records also place it above Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited in the share-control chain and record changes in its own corporate controllers during 2022.",
        "structuralRole": "Corporate control and current privacy-controller entity behind the Crisp brand",
        "significance": "The Group company helps connect an outward-facing service brand to registered legal relationships. Those relationships clarify where corporate control is reported, while leaving the historical contract signer, exact share percentages and instructions governing an individual service engagement to separate evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Registered control has dated boundaries",
            "text": "The Group is registered as holding more than 75% of shares in Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited, with notification dated 6 April 2016. Its own register records a Kroll corporate controller from 25 May to 29 December 2022 and a different Kroll corporate entity from 29 December 2022 in the inspected current record. These are statutory control bands and notification dates, not an exact 100% holding, purchase price or independently audited ultimate ownership history. The privacy notice does not prove the Group signed every earlier government sale.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
                "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-uk",
              "w15-impl-e-ki-group",
              "w15-impl-e-ka-group",
              "w15-impl-e-group-brand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Registry notified6April2016. Exact100% and separately listed voting-control rights are not established; company register is not independent beneficial-ownership audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-uk"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "registered corporate PSC holds75%+ shares",
            "sourceName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
            "date": "Notification6April2016; active in inspected register"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notified25May2022, ceased29December2022. Distinct exact corporate entity; no inferred price, ultimate owner or equality of notification and economic closing dates.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-ki-group"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Kroll International(UK) Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded historical75%+ shares and voting rights",
            "sourceName": "Kroll International(UK) Limited",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "date": "Notified25May2022;ceased29December2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current company/controller identity, not proof Group signed every historic sale or supplied each government report. Distinguishes brand from UK06442193.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-brand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
                "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "privacy policy identifies company trading as Crisp",
            "sourceName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "targetName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notified29December2022 and active in inspected record. Exact share percentage, consideration and legal transfer mechanism unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-ka-group"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Kroll Advisory Ltd.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded current75%+ shares and voting rights",
            "sourceName": "Kroll Advisory Ltd.",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "date": "Notification29December2022; current inspected register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-crisp-uk",
      "label": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company06442193. Registry identifies Group05636614 share control. DSIT supplier name matched across sources; payment CSV itself lacks company number.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-crisp-uk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-crisp-uk",
        "name": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company06442193. Registry identifies Group05636614 share control. DSIT supplier name matched across sources; payment CSV itself lacks company number.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company06442193. Registry identifies Group05636614 share control. DSIT supplier name matched across sources; payment CSV itself lacks company number."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited is registered company 06442193, a distinct entity from Crisp Thinking Group Limited. A DSIT spending row names it as a supplier receiving a February 2025 professional-services payment, while the company register identifies the Group's share-control relationship.",
        "structuralRole": "Named legal supplier in a departmental payment record",
        "significance": "This company anchors a money connection more precisely than the Crisp brand alone. The payment places a named supplier in DSIT's Security and Online Harms programme, but the accounting row does not identify which report, service period or contract the money settled.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded payment",
            "text": "DSIT transaction 654609 records GBP56,736 on 5 February 2025 under Security and Online Harms / NSOIT and Tech Programme. The supplier name matches the registered company, although the CSV itself contains no company number. The amount is a published departmental payment, not contract value or net revenue; VAT and invoice scope remain unspecified. The Group's registered share holding exceeds 75%. Neither record establishes that this payment financed a particular 2024 report or work in Australia, the World Economic Forum or another programme.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-uk",
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Data row94 transaction654609:GBP56736,5February2025,Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. CSV supplier-name matched to register; number absent fromCSV. Payment not contract total/net revenue; VAT,invoice period,deliverables unknown. No join to2023 award,WEF,Australia orOSCAR. Financial details: value: 56,736; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 2025-02-05;transaction654609;VATunknown",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes supplier payment for professional services",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
            "date": "2025-02-05 – 2025-02-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Registry notified6April2016. Exact100% and separately listed voting-control rights are not established; company register is not independent beneficial-ownership audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-group-uk"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "registered corporate PSC holds75%+ shares",
            "sourceName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
            "date": "Notification6April2016; active in inspected register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-kroll-international",
      "label": "Kroll International(UK) Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company09897805; historical registered CrispGroup controller, notified25May2022 and ceased29December2022. Not generic Kroll ultimate parent.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-kroll-international",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-kroll-international",
        "name": "Kroll International(UK) Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company09897805; historical registered CrispGroup controller, notified25May2022 and ceased29December2022. Not generic Kroll ultimate parent.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company09897805; historical registered CrispGroup controller, notified25May2022 and ceased29December2022. Not generic Kroll ultimate parent."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Company09897805; historical registered CrispGroup controller, notified25May2022 and ceased29December2022. Not generic Kroll ultimate parent.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notified25May2022, ceased29December2022. Distinct exact corporate entity; no inferred price, ultimate owner or equality of notification and economic closing dates.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-ki-group"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded historical75%+ shares and voting rights",
            "sourceName": "Kroll International(UK) Limited",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "date": "Notified25May2022;ceased29December2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-kroll-advisory",
      "label": "Kroll Advisory Ltd.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company05568550; registered current CrispGroup controller notified29December2022. Registry75%+ shares/votes does not establish exact percentage or ultimate ownership.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-kroll-advisory",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-kroll-advisory",
        "name": "Kroll Advisory Ltd.",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Company05568550; registered current CrispGroup controller notified29December2022. Registry75%+ shares/votes does not establish exact percentage or ultimate ownership.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company05568550; registered current CrispGroup controller notified29December2022. Registry75%+ shares/votes does not establish exact percentage or ultimate ownership."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Company05568550; registered current CrispGroup controller notified29December2022. Registry75%+ shares/votes does not establish exact percentage or ultimate ownership.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notified29December2022 and active in inspected record. Exact share percentage, consideration and legal transfer mechanism unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-ka-group"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded current75%+ shares and voting rights",
            "sourceName": "Kroll Advisory Ltd.",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking Group Limited",
            "date": "Notification29December2022; current inspected register"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
      "label": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Crisp brand alignment announcedMarch2024; later compliance partnership reported. Brand is distinct from ResolverInc and exact supplier entities.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Commercial brand"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-resolver-brand",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
        "name": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
        "role": "Commercial brand",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Crisp brand alignment announcedMarch2024; later compliance partnership reported. Brand is distinct from ResolverInc and exact supplier entities.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Crisp brand alignment announcedMarch2024; later compliance partnership reported. Brand is distinct from ResolverInc and exact supplier entities."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Crisp brand alignment announcedMarch2024; later compliance partnership reported. Brand is distinct from ResolverInc and exact supplier entities.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial brand",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Unsigned v3.0 terms dated20August2021 identify ResolverInc/applicable affiliates and customer OrderForm. No proof of supplier legal party to DSIT engagement or exclusive brand ownership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-terms-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolver Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "served standard terms name provider and applicable affiliates",
            "sourceName": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Resolver Inc.",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "18March2026 supplier account: joint engagement forUKOSA/EUDSA market, Resolver expertise plus IlluminateOSCAR. Not official endorsement, contract award or mandatory vendor selection. Existing Illuminate organization reused; legal-registration identity not newly supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-illuminate-partnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Illuminate Tech",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announces compliance-service collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Illuminate Tech",
            "date": "2026-03-18 – 2026-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Posted19March/body20March2024. Describes brand unification, not a new share acquisition; registry control chain kept separately.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-brand-alignment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announces operation under Resolver banner",
            "sourceName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "date": "Posted19March2024;body20March2024"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
            "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology",
            "heading": "Production roles actually established",
            "text": "The commercial connection matters as production participation. It does not demonstrate that Crisp/Resolver financed the typology, that any official procured its services, or that later statutory implementation requires its product. Resolver's page now includes a product call-to-action; the dated article does not establish when that promotional component was inserted.",
            "matched": [
              "Resolver"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b700ca6c0ff4d49d34f7ead4dea3c80b8e77a4a3c49fdb143ccefae6a01cfedf"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
            "heading": "The same market reports persistent friction",
            "text": "The report's acknowledgements include AVPA, Ofcom, OSTIA, Resolver, Yoti and other suppliers. That establishes participation or research input at the stated combined level, not that each answered every question, endorsed all conclusions or belonged to the earlier CDEI group. Its contextual citations include a Paladin/PUBLIC/Perspective Economics market study and a Tony Blair Institute paper. Citation does not establish commissioning by either organization.",
            "matched": [
              "Resolver"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cd85f1a25861669082b627c5a47f18edad1addead072ec54e7f3444f05bdd12a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-resolver-inc",
      "label": "Resolver Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named provider with applicable affiliates in currently served standard terms v3.0. Exact government engagement/signatory and incorporation jurisdiction unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-resolver-inc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-resolver-inc",
        "name": "Resolver Inc.",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named provider with applicable affiliates in currently served standard terms v3.0. Exact government engagement/signatory and incorporation jurisdiction unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named provider with applicable affiliates in currently served standard terms v3.0. Exact government engagement/signatory and incorporation jurisdiction unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named provider with applicable affiliates in currently served standard terms v3.0. Exact government engagement/signatory and incorporation jurisdiction unestablished.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Unsigned v3.0 terms dated20August2021 identify ResolverInc/applicable affiliates and customer OrderForm. No proof of supplier legal party to DSIT engagement or exclusive brand ownership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-terms-provider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "served standard terms name provider and applicable affiliates",
            "sourceName": "Resolver / Trust&Safety commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Resolver Inc.",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-customer-instructions",
      "label": "Customer-specified moderation instructions",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Supplier policy describes customer instructions for automatic removal, expert escalation and challenge; customer-channel processor role differs from crisis-index controller. Actual customer configuration unobserved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operational policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-customer-instructions",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-customer-instructions",
        "name": "Customer-specified moderation instructions",
        "role": "Operational policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Supplier policy describes customer instructions for automatic removal, expert escalation and challenge; customer-channel processor role differs from crisis-index controller. Actual customer configuration unobserved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Supplier policy describes customer instructions for automatic removal, expert escalation and challenge; customer-channel processor role differs from crisis-index controller. Actual customer configuration unobserved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Supplier policy describes customer instructions for automatic removal, expert escalation and challenge; customer-channel processor role differs from crisis-index controller. Actual customer configuration unobserved.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Published policy distinguishes processor on customer channels and controller for crisis index; automation, escalation and challenge described. Actual instructions/configuration and lawfulness not audited. Generic terms requireOrderForm/SOW; no DSIT-specific adoption implied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-service-instructions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
                "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes moderation subject to customer instructions",
            "sourceName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Customer-specified moderation instructions",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-oscar",
      "label": "OSCAR compliance workflow tool",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Illuminate tool translating requirements into compliance workflows; supplier partnership announcement, not a mandated product or awarded procurement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-oscar",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-oscar",
        "name": "OSCAR compliance workflow tool",
        "role": "Product",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Illuminate tool translating requirements into compliance workflows; supplier partnership announcement, not a mandated product or awarded procurement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Illuminate tool translating requirements into compliance workflows; supplier partnership announcement, not a mandated product or awarded procurement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Illuminate tool translating requirements into compliance workflows; supplier partnership announcement, not a mandated product or awarded procurement.",
        "structuralRole": "Product",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "OSCAR translates requirements into compliance workflows. Claimed product role; no proprietary-rights instrument, public purchaser or actual deployment inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-illuminate-oscar"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
                "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Illuminate Tech",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announcement identifies tool supplier",
            "sourceName": "Illuminate Tech",
            "targetName": "OSCAR compliance workflow tool",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "label": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Publisher of2025 supplier payment under Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. Operational commission and outputs require their own evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government department"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-dsit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "name": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
        "role": "Government department",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Publisher of2025 supplier payment under Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. Operational commission and outputs require their own evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Publisher of2025 supplier payment under Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. Operational commission and outputs require their own evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 11
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UK government department responsible for science, innovation and technology, including AISI and digital-policy work.",
        "structuralRole": "Government buyer with contractual approval and publication rights",
        "significance": "For the examined contract, DSIT controls final research approval and publication while the supplier retains commercially reusable knowledge.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Purchased services and retained government responsibilities",
            "text": "Departmental records show a GBP56,736 payment to Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited on 5 February 2025 and GBP118,000 to The Global Strategy Network Ltd on 12 September 2025. These are individual payments, not contract totals. A ministerial answer distinguishes GSN's narrative analysis from Faculty's platform development. Procurement material assigns government staff technical priorities and testing; disclosed variation terms provide source-code access and third-party maintenance rights, without establishing execution or delivery. Separate accounts record a GBP2.533 million IPO dividend to DSIT for PIPCU costs in 2025/26.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              },
              {
                "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
              },
              {
                "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-payment",
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-unit",
              "w15-impl-e-oversight-answer",
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-payment",
              "w16-supp-e-government-priorities",
              "w16-supp-e-dsit-variation",
              "w16-supp-e-buyer-licence",
              "w16-supp-e-authorise-maintainers",
              "w16-supp-e-source-access",
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-dsit-dividend",
              "w29-enf-e-baseline-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
              "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
              "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Authority in the contract",
            "text": "DSIT’s 2024 safeguards contract requires research sign-off, approved security planning and reporting. Its final publication decision coexists with supplier rights to underlying IP and related commercial products.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Original CSV data row107 records GBP118,000 on12September2025, transaction719926, for consultancy in the SOH Information Threats and Security Programme. Contract/project/expenditure-type cells are blank; supplier identity is a name match, not a company number in the CSV. VAT basis, service period and invoice scope remain unknown. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or handover date. Financial details: value: 118,000; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 12September2025;transaction719926;VAT/serviceperiodunknown",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes payment to named analysis supplier",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": "2025-09-12 – 2025-09-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Data row94 transaction654609:GBP56736,5February2025,Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. CSV supplier-name matched to register; number absent fromCSV. Payment not contract total/net revenue; VAT,invoice period,deliverables unknown. No join to2023 award,WEF,Australia orOSCAR. Financial details: value: 56,736; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 2025-02-05;transaction654609;VATunknown",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes supplier payment for professional services",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Limited",
            "date": "2025-02-05 – 2025-02-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "March2026 announcement commits approximately£3m annually, through IPO, for the three-year period. Amount is an announced approximate annual baseline, not an executed payment schedule or£9m observed cash total. Written answer19March confirms duration. Financial details: value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: approximate annual baseline commitment; period: April2026–March2029; per year, not three-year paid total",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-baseline-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              },
              {
                "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced baseline support through IPO forApril2026–March2029",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The DSIT product manager owns sprint priorities and user research; its programme manager leads strategy; analysts test as expert users. A prioritised backlog, government sprint goals and quarterly workshops are proposed working arrangements, not verified practice or supplier authority over policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-government-priorities"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "tender assigns government team technical priorities and testing",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC1-7 provides a buyer licence and authorised third-party use. The buyer must investigate evidenced misuse, use reasonable endeavours to secure correction and terminate the applicable sublicense for sustained breach, subject to procurement rules. These are terms, not observed exercises.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-buyer-licence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation provides perpetual buyer licence with misuse obligations",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "AppendixC7 on PDF111 continues onto112: source code and relevant documentation must be available to the buyer and its contractors in an accessible repository and usable format. The obligation does not prove delivery, completeness, successful maintenance or general public release.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-source-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation requires accessible source code and documentation",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC2,4-5 allows maintenance, hosting, development and adaptation for the buyer without a direct licence or other agreement with Faculty. It does not prove any replacement contractor was appointed or that practical switching costs were low.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-authorise-maintainers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation permits buyer to authorise third-party services",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF101-102:SecretaryofStateforDSIT andFacultyScience. Dated16August2023/effective17March2023,expiry31March2024. Visiblecopy signature/name/title/datefields uncompleted withoutblackredaction;executionunestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-dsit-variation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed variation names department asbuyer",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT spending over GBP25000: April2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/69735d123f2908a34904059e/dsit-spending-over-25000-april-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
            "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          },
          {
            "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
            "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-licensing45",
      "label": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Published review147 proposes possible condition of operation, with enforcement/newsbargaining/ombuds/cost uses and jurisdiction/design difficulties. Government explicitly did not support it.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-licensing45",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-licensing45",
        "name": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published review147 proposes possible condition of operation, with enforcement/newsbargaining/ombuds/cost uses and jurisdiction/design difficulties. Government explicitly did not support it.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published review147 proposes possible condition of operation, with enforcement/newsbargaining/ombuds/cost uses and jurisdiction/design difficulties. Government explicitly did not support it."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published review147 proposes possible condition of operation, with enforcement/newsbargaining/ombuds/cost uses and jurisdiction/design difficulties. Government explicitly did not support it.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published updated section10.10/printed147 andFOIAttachmentC PDF7 directly matchrec45. Possible enforcement,newsbargaining,ombuds andcost purposes; difficulties acknowledged. Citation toNicholls is not a named commission/drafter. No arithmetic matching from68/67 counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-review-licence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends considering licensing as operation condition",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Governmentresponse printed10-11 explicitNot supported. Rejects this proposed permission-to-operate condition, not every other enforcement/restriction mechanism or all future vehicles.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-licence-rejected"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government review response —April2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "does not support recommendation45 licensing proposal",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Review45: consider licensing major services",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-identification48",
      "label": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Review proposes phone-number collection at account opening, preventing notice tip-offs and compelled preservation. Response supports in principle. Express implementation of these elements not located in inspected duty-draft amendments; not an enacted universal-ID finding.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-identification48",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-identification48",
        "name": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Review proposes phone-number collection at account opening, preventing notice tip-offs and compelled preservation. Response supports in principle. Express implementation of these elements not located in inspected duty-draft amendments; not an enacted universal-ID finding.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Review proposes phone-number collection at account opening, preventing notice tip-offs and compelled preservation. Response supports in principle. Express implementation of these elements not located in inspected duty-draft amendments; not an enacted universal-ID finding."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recommendation 48 of the Australian Online Safety Act review proposes stronger account-identification and information-preservation arrangements. Its mechanisms include collecting phone numbers at account opening, preventing certain notice-related tip-offs and compelling preservation. The government's April 2026 response supports the recommendation in principle.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal that could expand identification and preservation duties",
        "significance": "The proposal links an online-safety investigator's need to identify a particular user with information collected earlier by service providers. That would affect both investigatory capacity and ordinary account-opening data practices. Its significance depends on which mechanisms are eventually enacted, rather than treating support in principle as a universal identification mandate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Proposal, response and draft-law boundary",
            "text": "The updated review's February 2025 text distinguishes identifying particular users from collecting information when accounts open and acknowledges privacy and security constraints. The 14 April 2026 response supports intent and merit subject to further proportionality and rights consideration. The inspected September 2026 Digital Duty of Care exposure-draft amendments did not expressly implement phone-at-signup, preservation notices or a general user-tip-off prohibition. That bounded comparison does not audit all other laws or future instruments; it preserves the difference between proposed machinery and an operative duty.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-review-phone",
              "w15-impl-e-government-phone",
              "w15-impl-e-draft-phone-comparison"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
              "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published updated section11.2/printed153-154 distinguishes identifying particular users from collecting information on account opening. Privacy/security constraints acknowledged; specific underlying drafter not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-review-phone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposes phone-at-opening, confidentiality and preservation",
            "sourceName": "Published updated statutory review —February2025",
            "targetName": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Printed11-13 supports intent/merit with further proportionality and rights consideration. Does not establish acceptance of every mechanism, enacted duty or deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-government-phone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government review response —April2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supports recommendation48 in principle",
            "sourceName": "Government review response —April2026",
            "targetName": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Full working reader keyword checks plus Schedule2 items52-57/Part13 review: end-user division regrouped and198-205 replaced. No express phone-at-signup, preservation-notice or general user-tipoff prohibition found there. Other laws/future instruments/parallel age-enforcement bill not exhaustively audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-draft-phone-comparison"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "inspected amendments do not expressly implement phone proposal",
            "sourceName": "Australia digital duty of care — exposure draft",
            "targetName": "Review48: account identification and preservation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
            "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
            "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice"
          },
          {
            "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
            "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "label": "National Security Online Information Team",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "DSIT operational unit: public-source monitoring and platform terms referrals within ministerial remit. Draft detailed instructions, current notice and actual testimony have distinct evidence states.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government unit"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-nsoit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "name": "National Security Online Information Team",
        "role": "Government unit",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "DSIT operational unit: public-source monitoring and platform terms referrals within ministerial remit. Draft detailed instructions, current notice and actual testimony have distinct evidence states.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "DSIT operational unit: public-source monitoring and platform terms referrals within ministerial remit. Draft detailed instructions, current notice and actual testimony have distinct evidence states."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
          },
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The National Security Online Information Team is a DSIT operational unit working on online information threats relevant to public safety and national security. Official accounts describe public-source monitoring, ministerially agreed priorities and referrals asking platforms to consider content against their own terms.",
        "structuralRole": "Government analysis and referral unit at the state–platform interface",
        "significance": "NSOIT connects government assessments of information threats with private platforms' moderation processes. Its ability to warn or refer can influence what a platform reviews, while the platform retains the stated action decision. The record distinguishes that operational relationship from statutory removal orders and from proposals to change the team's oversight.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Analysis, referrals and oversight debate",
            "text": "A January 2026 ministerial answer identifies GSN as providing narrative analysis. April 2026 testimony describes warnings and review requests concerning lawful-but-harmful narratives, including the Southport context, without proving particular removals or Crisp involvement. An information-rights decision confirms DSIT held a supplier-produced report and partly disclosed it in October 2025. A July 2025 committee recommended statutory footing and intelligence-committee oversight; the government's reply defended existing review channels without committing to that reform. The detailed operating policy acquired separately remains marked draft.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
              },
              {
                "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-unit",
              "w15-impl-e-minister-remit",
              "w15-impl-e-draft-policy",
              "w15-impl-e-nsoit-report",
              "w15-impl-e-lawful-referrals",
              "w15-impl-e-gsn-appointed",
              "w15-impl-e-oversight-request",
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-analysis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "ICO recounts DSIT holding one report and24October2025 partial release during complaint. Statement that other reports deleted under retention policy is department account, not independent deletion audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-nsoit-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "department held and partly disclosed report",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "date": "Request period week beginning24June2024; partial disclosure24October2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FOI-associated copy DRAFT throughout; final adoption and applicability to particular contractor unestablished. This is an instruction instrument, not evidence every action complied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-draft-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed draft describes operating and escalation rules",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July2025 report60-62 recommends institutional change. Not proof implemented; existing parliamentary questioning and disclosure review remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-oversight-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Commons Science,Innovation and Technology Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends statutory footing and intelligence-committee oversight",
            "sourceName": "Commons Science,Innovation and Technology Committee",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": "July2025 report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official notice identifies controller and response describes departmental unit; not a distinct incorporated organization.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-dsit-unit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
              },
              {
                "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "identifies department operational team",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "14April2026 testimonyQ29-31: Southport lawful-but-harmful narratives, early warnings before platform appearance, own-terms review. Platforms retain stated action decision. No proven foreign-state source, Crisp role or observed removals in this example. Trusted access is not statutory DSA designation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-lawful-referrals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "testimony describes lawful-content warnings and review requests",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
            "date": "Testimony14April2026 about earlier and continuing operations, not exact incident dates"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The27January2026 answer assigns GSN analysis of misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security. The answer, not misspelled names in the question, anchors attribution. No contract period, effectiveness or feed into CDDP is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-analysis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "ministerial answer identifies narrative-analysis function",
            "sourceName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": "Answer27January2026;activitystart/endunknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Appointment reported; fee, contract and start date unknown. No financial amount, exclusivity or replacement of Crisp established. April2024 page date is not contractor appointment date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-gsn-appointed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "current privacy notice names analysis contractor",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public-safety/national-security focus; selection of high-risk subjects described. Exact task-order or referral approval not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-minister-remit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSIT ministers — scope-setting role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "government says ministers agree and review remit",
            "sourceName": "DSIT ministers — scope-setting role",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
          },
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          },
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-dsit-ministers",
      "label": "DSIT ministers — scope-setting role",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Public answers say ministers agree and review high-risk remit. A role over task selection, not evidence a named minister approved each referral.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-dsit-ministers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-dsit-ministers",
        "name": "DSIT ministers — scope-setting role",
        "role": "Government role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Public answers say ministers agree and review high-risk remit. A role over task selection, not evidence a named minister approved each referral.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public answers say ministers agree and review high-risk remit. A role over task selection, not evidence a named minister approved each referral."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public answers say ministers agree and review high-risk remit. A role over task selection, not evidence a named minister approved each referral.",
        "structuralRole": "Government role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public-safety/national-security focus; selection of high-risk subjects described. Exact task-order or referral approval not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-minister-remit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "government says ministers agree and review remit",
            "sourceName": "DSIT ministers — scope-setting role",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
      "label": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Requires agreed sources/search terms/task scope and legal/privacy assurance; sustained monitoring needs ministerial agreement. Sensitive-origin exclusions and source limits apply in draft. Exact escalation approvals partly redacted; adoption/applicability unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Draft policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
        "name": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
        "role": "Draft policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Requires agreed sources/search terms/task scope and legal/privacy assurance; sustained monitoring needs ministerial agreement. Sensitive-origin exclusions and source limits apply in draft. Exact escalation approvals partly redacted; adoption/applicability unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Requires agreed sources/search terms/task scope and legal/privacy assurance; sustained monitoring needs ministerial agreement. Sensitive-origin exclusions and source limits apply in draft. Exact escalation approvals partly redacted; adoption/applicability unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The disclosed NSOIT delivery and escalation policy is a document marked DRAFT describing how the team and delivery partners should collect information, receive instructions and refer material to platforms. It is evidence of a proposed operating framework, with adoption and applicability to particular contractors unestablished.",
        "structuralRole": "Draft instruction framework for government monitoring and referral work",
        "significance": "The document exposes the intended chain from buyer-approved tasks to collection and possible platform escalation. Its source limits, privacy checks and approval requirements help locate proposed constraints on contractors and officials. A draft can show designed authority without proving that the procedures governed or were followed in an actual case.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Agreed collection and bounded escalation",
            "text": "The draft requires documented instructions covering sources, search terms and task scope, together with onboarding and continuing legal and privacy assurance. Sustained monitoring requires ministerial agreement. It describes sensitive political and journalistic-origin exclusions and collection, retention and surveillance limits. Its escalation provisions concern potential breaches of platform terms within ministerial remit, with platform action remaining discretionary. Some thresholds and approvals are redacted. The retained copy does not establish final adoption, the named approver of a referral or an automatic removal mechanism.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-draft-policy",
              "w15-impl-e-partner-directions",
              "w15-impl-e-draft-escalation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft3.5-3.6: documented instructions, sources/search terms/task scope, onboarding and continuing assurance. Collection/retention/privacy/surveillance limits, political and journalistic-origin no-flag exclusions remain part of draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-partner-directions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NSOIT external delivery partners — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would require buyer-agreed instructions and methods",
            "sourceName": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "targetName": "NSOIT external delivery partners — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft4.1-4.2 limits flagging to ministerial remit and potential terms breaches; exact threshold/approval partially redacted. Sensitive-origin exclusions apply; no automatic removal or known authorizer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-draft-escalation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes authorized referrals with platform discretion",
            "sourceName": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "targetName": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FOI-associated copy DRAFT throughout; final adoption and applicability to particular contractor unestablished. This is an instruction instrument, not evidence every action complied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-draft-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed draft describes operating and escalation rules",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-nsoit-partners",
      "label": "NSOIT external delivery partners — role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Draft describes processors following DSIT documented instructions; actual executed order/SOW and relation toFebruary2025 payment remain missing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contractor role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-nsoit-partners",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-nsoit-partners",
        "name": "NSOIT external delivery partners — role",
        "role": "Contractor role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Draft describes processors following DSIT documented instructions; actual executed order/SOW and relation toFebruary2025 payment remain missing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Draft describes processors following DSIT documented instructions; actual executed order/SOW and relation toFebruary2025 payment remain missing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Draft describes processors following DSIT documented instructions; actual executed order/SOW and relation toFebruary2025 payment remain missing.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractor role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft3.5-3.6: documented instructions, sources/search terms/task scope, onboarding and continuing assurance. Collection/retention/privacy/surveillance limits, political and journalistic-origin no-flag exclusions remain part of draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-partner-directions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would require buyer-agreed instructions and methods",
            "sourceName": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "targetName": "NSOIT external delivery partners — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-platform-review",
      "label": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Department describes trusted channels, warnings and review under each platform own terms. Platforms retain stated action choice; actual referral outcomes and pressure not resolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operational role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-platform-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-platform-review",
        "name": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
        "role": "Operational role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Department describes trusted channels, warnings and review under each platform own terms. Platforms retain stated action choice; actual referral outcomes and pressure not resolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Department describes trusted channels, warnings and review under each platform own terms. Platforms retain stated action choice; actual referral outcomes and pressure not resolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Department describes trusted channels, warnings and review under each platform own terms. Platforms retain stated action choice; actual referral outcomes and pressure not resolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft4.1-4.2 limits flagging to ministerial remit and potential terms breaches; exact threshold/approval partially redacted. Sensitive-origin exclusions apply; no automatic removal or known authorizer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-draft-escalation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
                "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes authorized referrals with platform discretion",
            "sourceName": "NSOIT delivery and escalation instructions — DRAFT",
            "targetName": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "14April2026 testimonyQ29-31: Southport lawful-but-harmful narratives, early warnings before platform appearance, own-terms review. Platforms retain stated action decision. No proven foreign-state source, Crisp role or observed removals in this example. Trusted access is not statutory DSA designation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-lawful-referrals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "testimony describes lawful-content warnings and review requests",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "Platforms reviewing NSOIT referrals",
            "date": "Testimony14April2026 about earlier and continuing operations, not exact incident dates"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
      "label": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "ICO independently confirms one held report and partial disclosure24October2025. Underlying report unread, exact date/contractor entity unspecified. Department later calls electionweek; do not replace request period or join to2025 invoice.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Document"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
        "name": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
        "role": "Document",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ICO independently confirms one held report and partial disclosure24October2025. Underlying report unread, exact date/contractor entity unspecified. Department later calls electionweek; do not replace request period or join to2025 invoice.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ICO independently confirms one held report and partial disclosure24October2025. Underlying report unread, exact date/contractor entity unspecified. Department later calls electionweek; do not replace request period or join to2025 invoice."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ICO independently confirms one held report and partial disclosure24October2025. Underlying report unread, exact date/contractor entity unspecified. Department later calls electionweek; do not replace request period or join to2025 invoice.",
        "structuralRole": "Document",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "11November2025 decision after independent inspection and partial release. June2024 referral count10 also disclosed; counts are referrals not removals. Appeal route exists. Ruling on disclosure, not operating legality or all-content review.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-ico-decision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "upholds remaining national-security redactions",
            "sourceName": "Information Commissioner’s Office",
            "targetName": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "date": "2025-11-11 – 2025-11-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "ICO recounts DSIT holding one report and24October2025 partial release during complaint. Statement that other reports deleted under retention policy is department account, not independent deletion audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-nsoit-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "department held and partly disclosed report",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "date": "Request period week beginning24June2024; partial disclosure24October2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Request concerns week beginning24June2024. Disclosure adjudicator inspected full report. Legal signer, exact reportdate, keywords and2025payment match unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-crisp-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
                "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ICO confirms supplier-produced report was held",
            "sourceName": "Crisp commercial brand",
            "targetName": "Crisp report requested for week beginning24June2024",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-gsn",
      "label": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Official register identifies active company10433562, incorporated18October2016. Current notice names analysis contractor;27January2026 answer distinguishes GSN analysis fromFaculty platform development. OneSeptember2025 payment is recorded. Exact appointment,contract scope andCrisp succession/parallel provision remain unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-gsn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-gsn",
        "name": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Official register identifies active company10433562, incorporated18October2016. Current notice names analysis contractor;27January2026 answer distinguishes GSN analysis fromFaculty platform development. OneSeptember2025 payment is recorded. Exact appointment,contract scope andCrisp succession/parallel provision remain unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official register identifies active company10433562, incorporated18October2016. Current notice names analysis contractor;27January2026 answer distinguishes GSN analysis fromFaculty platform development. OneSeptember2025 payment is recorded. Exact appointment,contract scope andCrisp succession/parallel provision remain unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd is UK company 10433562, incorporated on 18 October 2016. The NSOIT privacy notice names it as an analysis contractor, and a January 2026 ministerial answer describes its work on misinformation and disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial analysis supplier for the government's information-threat work",
        "significance": "GSN is the named analysis layer between public-source information and NSOIT's interpretation of threats. This role is distinct from Faculty's technical platform development. Identifying the supplier and a payment makes the purchased service tangible while leaving its exact task orders, evaluation and relation to earlier Crisp work unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Payment and corporate control",
            "text": "DSIT's September 2025 spending file records GBP118,000 to GSN on 12 September, transaction 719926, for consultancy in the information-threats programme. The row leaves contract and project fields blank and does not give the service period or VAT basis. The inspected control register records Giles Henry Donne Barrett and Matthew Thomas King each in the greater-than-25%-through-50% share and voting bands. Those bands do not establish equal halves or individual operational instructions. The retained sources do not prove that GSN replaced Crisp exclusively.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
              },
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-gsn-appointed",
              "w16-supp-e-barrett-gsn",
              "w16-supp-e-king-gsn",
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-payment",
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-analysis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Original CSV data row107 records GBP118,000 on12September2025, transaction719926, for consultancy in the SOH Information Threats and Security Programme. Contract/project/expenditure-type cells are blank; supplier identity is a name match, not a company number in the CSV. VAT basis, service period and invoice scope remain unknown. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or handover date. Financial details: value: 118,000; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 12September2025;transaction719926;VAT/serviceperiodunknown",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes payment to named analysis supplier",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": "2025-09-12 – 2025-09-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current PSC band, notification28October2020. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-king-gsn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Matthew Thomas King",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
            "sourceName": "Matthew Thomas King",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": "Notification28October2020;active in inspected record"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current PSC band, notification24June2021. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-barrett-gsn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Giles Henry Donne Barrett",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
            "sourceName": "Giles Henry Donne Barrett",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": "Notification24June2021;active in inspected record"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The27January2026 answer assigns GSN analysis of misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security. The answer, not misspelled names in the question, anchors attribution. No contract period, effectiveness or feed into CDDP is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-gsn-analysis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "ministerial answer identifies narrative-analysis function",
            "sourceName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": "Answer27January2026;activitystart/endunknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Appointment reported; fee, contract and start date unknown. No financial amount, exclusivity or replacement of Crisp established. April2024 page date is not contractor appointment date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-gsn-appointed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "current privacy notice names analysis contractor",
            "sourceName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "The present analysis supplier",
            "text": "Companies House identifies THE GLOBAL STRATEGY NETWORK LTD, company 10433562, incorporated 18 October 2016 and currently active. Its public PSC register records Giles Henry Donne Barrett and Matthew Thomas King each with more than 25% and not more than 50% of shares and voting rights, notified respectively 24 June 2021 and 28 October 2020. Richard Barrett's PSC status ceased 24 June 2021. These bands do not establish an exact half-share each, a family relationship, or Richard's current control. Personal addresses and birth information were not extracted into the case.",
            "matched": [
              "The Global Strategy Network Ltd"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8e6c4ea56e1f051e3bd1d155b1ae60dd8004d09a42e1eb44052b9bb684f050f2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "The present analysis supplier",
            "text": "DSIT's September 2025 spending CSV records a payment of GBP 118,000 on 12 September 2025 to The Global Strategy Network Ltd, transaction 719926. Expense: Consultancy Expenditure; area: Security and Online Harms; description: SOH Info Threats and Security Programme. The original CSV has blank contract/project/expenditure-type fields, rendered as Not set in the HTML preview. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or demonstrated invoice scope. VAT basis and service period are not provided. The supplier is named, without a company number in the row; association to the registered company is a name match supported by official supplier naming, not a registry identifier in this payment.",
            "matched": [
              "The Global Strategy Network Ltd"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a7d89680e35a93ad9498638b3c1e0b73eb73c61aa74cc0b0bdcbfca5081027d0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          },
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-science-committee",
      "label": "Commons Science,Innovation and Technology Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Recommended statutory footing and Intelligence and Security Committee oversight for NSOIT in2025. Government reply offers existing channels without commitment to requested change.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Parliamentary committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w15-impl-science-committee",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-science-committee",
        "name": "Commons Science,Innovation and Technology Committee",
        "role": "Parliamentary committee",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Recommended statutory footing and Intelligence and Security Committee oversight for NSOIT in2025. Government reply offers existing channels without commitment to requested change.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recommended statutory footing and Intelligence and Security Committee oversight for NSOIT in2025. Government reply offers existing channels without commitment to requested change."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "implementation",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recommended statutory footing and Intelligence and Security Committee oversight for NSOIT in2025. Government reply offers existing channels without commitment to requested change.",
        "structuralRole": "Parliamentary committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reply to62 cites ministerial/parliamentary oversight, privacy notices, FOI and subject access. No commitment to requested statutory/ISC reform in inspected reply; no absence-of-all-review inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-oversight-answer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defends existing review channels without committing to requested change",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Commons Science,Innovation and Technology Committee",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July2025 report60-62 recommends institutional change. Not proof implemented; existing parliamentary questioning and disclosure review remain distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w15-impl-e-oversight-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends statutory footing and intelligence-committee oversight",
            "sourceName": "Commons Science,Innovation and Technology Committee",
            "targetName": "National Security Online Information Team",
            "date": "July2025 report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
            "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-barrett",
      "label": "Giles Henry Donne Barrett",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Registered GSNPSC, notified24June2021:more than25% through50% shares/votes. Exact holding and family relationship not inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-barrett",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-barrett",
        "name": "Giles Henry Donne Barrett",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Registered GSNPSC, notified24June2021:more than25% through50% shares/votes. Exact holding and family relationship not inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Registered GSNPSC, notified24June2021:more than25% through50% shares/votes. Exact holding and family relationship not inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Giles Henry Donne Barrett is a person with significant control of The Global Strategy Network Ltd, the UK company identified in this investigation as a government analysis supplier.",
        "structuralRole": "Registered ownership and voting interest in an analysis supplier",
        "significance": "The ownership register provides a route from a contracted company to disclosed private interests. It helps identify who holds substantial corporate rights, while leaving particular research assignments and government policy choices to their own evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Registered control",
            "text": "Companies House records Barrett as holding more than 25% and not more than 50% of both shares and voting rights, notified on 24 June 2021. That is a statutory disclosure band, rather than an exact percentage. Richard Barrett's control entry ceased on that same date; the record does not establish a family relationship or a continuing control arrangement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-barrett-gsn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current PSC band, notification24June2021. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-barrett-gsn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
            "sourceName": "Giles Henry Donne Barrett",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": "Notification24June2021;active in inspected record"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "The present analysis supplier",
            "text": "Companies House identifies THE GLOBAL STRATEGY NETWORK LTD, company 10433562, incorporated 18 October 2016 and currently active. Its public PSC register records Giles Henry Donne Barrett and Matthew Thomas King each with more than 25% and not more than 50% of shares and voting rights, notified respectively 24 June 2021 and 28 October 2020. Richard Barrett's PSC status ceased 24 June 2021. These bands do not establish an exact half-share each, a family relationship, or Richard's current control. Personal addresses and birth information were not extracted into the case.",
            "matched": [
              "Giles Henry Donne Barrett",
              "Barrett"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8e6c4ea56e1f051e3bd1d155b1ae60dd8004d09a42e1eb44052b9bb684f050f2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-king",
      "label": "Matthew Thomas King",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Registered GSNPSC, notified28October2020:more than25% through50% shares/votes. Bands are not exact half-shares or a separate operating-decision mandate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-king",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-king",
        "name": "Matthew Thomas King",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Registered GSNPSC, notified28October2020:more than25% through50% shares/votes. Bands are not exact half-shares or a separate operating-decision mandate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Registered GSNPSC, notified28October2020:more than25% through50% shares/votes. Bands are not exact half-shares or a separate operating-decision mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Matthew Thomas King is a registered person with significant control of The Global Strategy Network Ltd, company 10433562, whose work includes analysis supplied to the UK government.",
        "structuralRole": "Registered shareholder and voting-rights holder",
        "significance": "King's entry locates substantial private corporate rights behind the supplier. Those rights are relevant to governance and financial interest, but the register does not identify who chose particular narratives for analysis or directed a specific government response.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the register records",
            "text": "King's entry was notified on 28 October 2020 and covers more than 25% and not more than 50% of shares and voting rights. Giles Henry Donne Barrett is recorded in the same bands under a later notification. Matching bands do not establish equal half-shares or a joint voting agreement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-king-gsn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current PSC band, notification28October2020. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-king-gsn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
            "sourceName": "Matthew Thomas King",
            "targetName": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd",
            "date": "Notification28October2020;active in inspected record"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "The present analysis supplier",
            "text": "Companies House identifies THE GLOBAL STRATEGY NETWORK LTD, company 10433562, incorporated 18 October 2016 and currently active. Its public PSC register records Giles Henry Donne Barrett and Matthew Thomas King each with more than 25% and not more than 50% of shares and voting rights, notified respectively 24 June 2021 and 28 October 2020. Richard Barrett's PSC status ceased 24 June 2021. These bands do not establish an exact half-share each, a family relationship, or Richard's current control. Personal addresses and birth information were not extracted into the case.",
            "matched": [
              "Matthew Thomas King"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8e6c4ea56e1f051e3bd1d155b1ae60dd8004d09a42e1eb44052b9bb684f050f2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "label": "Faculty Science Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Supplier registration08873131 in disclosed order102548. January2026 answer namesFacultyScience asCDDP developer. Later inaccessible indexed registration mismatch not merged or promoted.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-faculty",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "name": "Faculty Science Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Supplier registration08873131 in disclosed order102548. January2026 answer namesFacultyScience asCDDP developer. Later inaccessible indexed registration mismatch not merged or promoted.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Supplier registration08873131 in disclosed order102548. January2026 answer namesFacultyScience asCDDP developer. Later inaccessible indexed registration mismatch not merged or promoted."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Faculty Science Limited, registration 08873131, is the software supplier named in a released CDDP order. A 27 January 2026 ministerial answer identifies Faculty Science as developing the government platform; earlier tender material describes its incumbent development role.",
        "structuralRole": "Private developer with contractual software ownership",
        "significance": "Faculty connects government analytical infrastructure to privately supplied engineering and intellectual property. Government technical direction, payment acceptance, software ownership and access for replacement maintainers are separate powers. Reading them together explains both the buyer's control over requested work and its dependence on usable software and documentation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Development, fees and intellectual property",
            "text": "Order 102548 identifies the legal company. A March 2023 variation in the separate 102887 trail adds £400,000 excluding VAT against delivery and buyer acceptance; its printed revised total contains an unresolved £30,000 discrepancy against simple addition. An August 2023 variation caps additional services at £510,000 excluding VAT. These are contract amounts, not verified payments. Appendix C allocates new software ownership to the supplier while providing a perpetual buyer licence and accessible source-code obligations. The visible variation copy does not establish execution or successful delivery.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-faculty-platform",
              "w16-supp-e-faculty-incumbency",
              "w16-supp-e-variation-cap",
              "w16-supp-e-fixed-fee-acceptance",
              "w16-supp-e-supplier-ip",
              "w16-supp-e-source-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "New parent and embedded evaluation",
            "text": "Companies House records Accenture plc control of Faculty Science Limited from March 12, 2026: at least 75% of shares and voting rights, plus director appointment/removal rights. Completion was announced March 16. In September, Anthropic selected the Faculty-led Accenture team for paid embedded evaluation. The precise legal signatory of that evaluation contract remains undisclosed. This adds a frontier-lab assessment role to the government-platform work already documented here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Faculty Science Limited: persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              },
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acquires",
              "w48-eval-e-faculty-embedded"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Variation102887No2 on PDF137 adds GBP400,000 excluding VAT in two GBP200,000 instalments against agreed outputs/functionality. Its printed total1,944,650 is30,000 above1,514,650 plus400,000. This is a visible-record discrepancy, not OCR. Intervening terms remain unknown; no spending aggregate, fraud finding or corrected total is asserted. Financial details: value: 400,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed variation fee excludingVAT;delivery/acceptancecondition; period: Dated1March2023;effective16January2023;paymentnotverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-fixed-fee-acceptance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies fixed fee payable against delivery and buyer acceptance",
            "sourceName": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "PDF101-102 maximumGBP510000excludingVAT,monthlyarrears;printed revisedcontracttotalGBP2373873 isseparate,not an additionalcashamount. Neither executedpayment nor combinedprogrammebudget established. Financial details: value: 510,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed variation maximum excludingVAT;executionunestablished; period: Dated16August2023;effective17March2023;expiry31March2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-variation-cap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies capped fee for additional services",
            "sourceName": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "AppendixC7 on PDF111 continues onto112: source code and relevant documentation must be available to the buyer and its contractors in an accessible repository and usable format. The obligation does not prove delivery, completeness, successful maintenance or general public release.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-source-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation requires accessible source code and documentation",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC1 says the new IP/software shall be owned by the supplier, not assigned to the buyer, subject to a perpetual licence. This differs from technical direction. Execution is not established from the uncompleted visible copy; no absolute supplier veto is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-supplier-ip"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation allocates new IP and software ownership to supplier",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Companies House lists Accenture plc with at least 75% of shares and voting rights, plus director appointment/removal rights, notified March 12.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acquires"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Faculty Science Limited: persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Filed control: at least 75% shares and votes",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Officialdescription/PAaccount namesFaculty/PUBLICconsortium; no CDDPcontractorcrosswalk or project-specificcash inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-facultyosdi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Faculty is identified as the lead specialist business.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-faculty-embedded"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Leads evaluation work",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Accenture identifies Warner as Faculty CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-warner-faculty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marc Warner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Marc Warner",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "Original contracts released under FOI",
            "text": "Page 114 identifies Faculty Science Limited, registration 08873131, in order 102548. Page 133 contains the 16 February 2022 variation and GBP 250,000 excluding VAT, with a design document and proof-of-concept report among deliverables. Some surrounding deliverable detail is not readable. Page 135, variation 102887 No.1 dated 13 December 2022, says milestone-two MVP completed 30 September 2022 and revises the cap from GBP 1,264,650 to GBP 1,514,650. Page 137, No.2 dated 1 March 2023/effective 16 January, adds GBP 400,000 excluding VAT payable against delivery/buyer acceptance and prints total GBP 1,944,650. That is GBP 30,000 above a simple addition to the previous stated total; intervening terms/reconciliation remain uninspected. No combined-spend total, fraud inference or silent correction is appropriate.",
            "matched": [
              "Faculty Science Limited"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc640da818c80e21d31b3e6606cd6b32c68ca57ee9f153ba4f4f160024663606"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Faculty brings a specialist business into that arrangement. Companies House records Accenture plc control of Faculty Science Limited from March 12: at least 75% of shares and votes, plus director appointment/removal rights. Completion was announced March 16, with Faculty CEO Marc Warner additionally becoming Accenture CTO. Filed control ; completion .",
            "matched": [
              "Faculty Science Limited"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32661cece9c59acc400354d9d5a74d3b9cad2baf433186cf653f43ca60f0f2b9"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
          },
          {
            "title": "Faculty Science Limited: persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          },
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Official answer identifiesFaculty development; tender allocates technical priorities to government. Business case describes cross-government information sharing. Actual effectiveness,query choices andreferral outcomes unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government technical platform"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-cddp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "name": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
        "role": "Government technical platform",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Official answer identifiesFaculty development; tender allocates technical priorities to government. Business case describes cross-government information sharing. Actual effectiveness,query choices andreferral outcomes unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official answer identifiesFaculty development; tender allocates technical priorities to government. Business case describes cross-government information sharing. Actual effectiveness,query choices andreferral outcomes unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Counter-Disinformation Data Platform is a UK government project intended to support information sharing and analysis of misinformation, disinformation and manipulative behaviour across departments. A January 2026 ministerial answer identifies Faculty Science as its developer.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared analytical infrastructure commissioned by government",
        "significance": "CDDP connects public funding, private software development and government analytical priorities. The procurement places sprint priorities, strategy and expert testing with government personnel; ownership and maintenance rights sit in a separate contractual layer. This division matters when asking who sets the work and who can sustain the software.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From pilot funding to development",
            "text": "The October 2021 business case proposed discovery and delivery phases. Treasury announced £8.4 million in Shared Outcomes Fund pilot funding, naming several participating departments and agencies; that announcement is not a supplier-payment ledger. The September 2023 tender covered development, hosting and maintenance with an indicative £500,000–£920,000 budget. Its requirements assign priorities to a DSIT product manager and testing to analysts. The 27 January 2026 answer confirms the named development role, without establishing operational effectiveness or individual referral outcomes.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-business-case",
              "w33-con-e-pilotfunding",
              "w16-supp-e-tender-platform",
              "w16-supp-e-government-priorities",
              "w16-supp-e-faculty-platform"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
              "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The DSIT product manager owns sprint priorities and user research; its programme manager leads strategy; analysts test as expert users. A prioritised backlog, government sprint goals and quarterly workshops are proposed working arrangements, not verified practice or supplier authority over policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-government-priorities"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "tender assigns government team technical priorities and testing",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "September2023requirementsforHMGusers,prototypes andAWSmanagement. Indicative500000-920000budget,one-year/six-monthextension/breakterms aretenderstates,notaward/spend;19applications andproposedfiveassessment notwinningresult. Conflictingstart/enddates,BEISbranding andplaceholders retained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-tender-platform"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP procurement26087 — requirements",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies development,hosting andmaintenance procurement",
            "sourceName": "CDDP procurement26087 — requirements",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "October2021 PDF1-2 SharedOutcomesFundcase,SROSarahConnolly,Discovery/Deliveryphases,misinformation/disinformation/manipulativebehaviour. Namedplan,not validatedperformance. Participatingdepartments/valuefields unreadable/redacted,notreconstructed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-business-case"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "business case proposes cross-government data-sharing capacity",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": "October2021 businesscase"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "SharedOutcomesFundRound2CDDP entry namesDCMS,FCDO,HomeOffice,CabinetOffice,MOD,GCHQ,NCSC participation. No proof each supplied data or controlled platform; do not add to supplierprices. Financial details: value: 8,400,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pilot funding; no recipient-payment ledger; period: Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 Payment status: No supplier allocation/disbursement established",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-pilotfunding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced GBP8.4million pilot funding",
            "sourceName": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The27January2026 answer names Faculty Science; the earlier disclosed order at PDF114 identifies Faculty Science Limited08873131. This is an official role account, not an acceptance audit. The inaccessible later cover with a different registration is not merged or used to infer replacement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-faculty-platform"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "ministerial answer identifies platform development function",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": "Official answer27January2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Undated supplier article namesCDDP among3SOFprojects. Exactwork,commission,fee,legalentity and acceptancedeliverable unknown. OSDIconsortium cannot fill those gaps.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publiccddp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports participation in delivery",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "The present analysis supplier",
            "text": "The 27 January 2026 ministerial answer to question 106529 separates two functions: GSN provides analysis of online misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security; Faculty Science develops the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform (CDDP). The question itself misspells the supplier names; the answer is the attribution anchor. This is an official role account, not a technical or effectiveness audit.",
            "matched": [
              "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3e7ca635094931ea2fe4bdb924820e3d463f0aac8dd8f71f45bf4c9164776bb7"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
            "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld",
            "heading": "Finding",
            "text": "PUBLIC itself says it helped deliver three Shared Outcomes Fund projects, including the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform. That supports an attributed claim of participation. It does not specify what PUBLIC delivered for CDDP, whether it held a direct commission or a subcontract, the relevant legal entity, a fee, a work period or an accepted deliverable. The original CDDP procurement link now redirects to the marketplace homepage. The retained official contract, however, exposes a precise missing record: the buyer's approved key-subcontractor identities in the project-management call-off are redacted. That is a credible location where PUBLIC's role might be resolved, without identifying PUBLIC as an obscured entry.",
            "matched": [
              "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fb6520262e8295f8271189a0ad5020a4f1c81541b8ff87b5c6b5bc9fb42eb194"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
            "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld"
          },
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-procurement26087",
      "label": "CDDP procurement26087 — requirements",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "September2023 opportunity specifies DSIT-directed development,hosting,maintenance. IncumbentFaculty,indicative budget andplanned assessment do not establish award,actual delivery or replacement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Procurement record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-procurement26087",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-procurement26087",
        "name": "CDDP procurement26087 — requirements",
        "role": "Procurement record",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "September2023 opportunity specifies DSIT-directed development,hosting,maintenance. IncumbentFaculty,indicative budget andplanned assessment do not establish award,actual delivery or replacement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "September2023 opportunity specifies DSIT-directed development,hosting,maintenance. IncumbentFaculty,indicative budget andplanned assessment do not establish award,actual delivery or replacement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "September2023 opportunity specifies DSIT-directed development,hosting,maintenance. IncumbentFaculty,indicative budget andplanned assessment do not establish award,actual delivery or replacement.",
        "structuralRole": "Procurement record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "September2023requirementsforHMGusers,prototypes andAWSmanagement. Indicative500000-920000budget,one-year/six-monthextension/breakterms aretenderstates,notaward/spend;19applications andproposedfiveassessment notwinningresult. Conflictingstart/enddates,BEISbranding andplaceholders retained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-tender-platform"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies development,hosting andmaintenance procurement",
            "sourceName": "CDDP procurement26087 — requirements",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Tender namesFaculty andMarch2024currentcontractend, alongsideOctober2023lateststart. DatedJanuary2026answerstillnamesFaculty;proposedtransition doesnotproveactualreplacement or thisawardresult.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-faculty-incumbency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
                "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "procurement names incumbent in extendedAlpha",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "CDDP procurement26087 — requirements",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
      "label": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Dated16August2023/effective17March2023;expiry31March2024;capGBP510000excludingVAT;printed totalGBP2373873. Visible signature fields uncompleted without black redaction; execution unestablished. AppendixC variesIPallocation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contract variation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-faculty102548",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
        "name": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
        "role": "Contract variation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Dated16August2023/effective17March2023;expiry31March2024;capGBP510000excludingVAT;printed totalGBP2373873. Visible signature fields uncompleted without black redaction; execution unestablished. AppendixC variesIPallocation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated16August2023/effective17March2023;expiry31March2024;capGBP510000excludingVAT;printed totalGBP2373873. Visible signature fields uncompleted without black redaction; execution unestablished. AppendixC variesIPallocation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Dated16August2023/effective17March2023;expiry31March2024;capGBP510000excludingVAT;printed totalGBP2373873. Visible signature fields uncompleted without black redaction; execution unestablished. AppendixC variesIPallocation.",
        "structuralRole": "Contract variation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "PDF101-102 maximumGBP510000excludingVAT,monthlyarrears;printed revisedcontracttotalGBP2373873 isseparate,not an additionalcashamount. Neither executedpayment nor combinedprogrammebudget established. Financial details: value: 510,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed variation maximum excludingVAT;executionunestablished; period: Dated16August2023;effective17March2023;expiry31March2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-variation-cap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies capped fee for additional services",
            "sourceName": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF101-102 and AppendixC110-112 align this call-off with G-Cloud12 effective11April2022, retrospectively and prospectively. New IP and specially written software shall be supplier-owned and licensed, not assigned. This changes the stated allocation; it does not establish that earlier ownership necessarily remained unchanged.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-ip-variation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "varies ownership and licensing across two call-offs",
            "sourceName": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF101-102:SecretaryofStateforDSIT andFacultyScience. Dated16August2023/effective17March2023,expiry31March2024. Visiblecopy signature/name/title/datefields uncompleted withoutblackredaction;executionunestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-dsit-variation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed variation names department asbuyer",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
      "label": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "AppendixC changes arrangements: newIP/specially-written software shall be supplier-owned,not assigned;buyer licence perpetual. Permitted third-party service rights andsource access obligations are terms,not proof delivery or successful switching.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contractual resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-licensed-ip",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
        "name": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
        "role": "Contractual resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "AppendixC changes arrangements: newIP/specially-written software shall be supplier-owned,not assigned;buyer licence perpetual. Permitted third-party service rights andsource access obligations are terms,not proof delivery or successful switching.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "AppendixC changes arrangements: newIP/specially-written software shall be supplier-owned,not assigned;buyer licence perpetual. Permitted third-party service rights andsource access obligations are terms,not proof delivery or successful switching."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject represents the CDDP software and intellectual-property rights described in a disclosed contractual variation. The terms place ownership of new intellectual property and specially written software with the supplier, accompanied by a perpetual government licence.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractual allocation of ownership and maintenance rights",
        "significance": "Software custody can outlast the development contract. The arrangement gives government a route to continued use and third-party maintenance while restricting commercial reuse by those third parties. Its practical value depends on usable code and documentation, making contractual permission and actual capacity to switch suppliers separate questions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the licence permits",
            "text": "Appendix C aligns two call-offs with G-Cloud 12 arrangements effective from 11 April 2022, retrospectively and prospectively. It permits authorised contractors to use, adapt and modify the software to serve the buyer. They cannot exploit it for unrelated commercial benefit or build a competing commercial product from it. The buyer must address evidenced misuse and sustained breaches under the stated conditions. These are obligations in the disclosed terms; the record does not show exercised enforcement or completed maintenance transfers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-ip-variation",
              "w16-supp-e-supplier-ip",
              "w16-supp-e-buyer-licence",
              "w16-supp-e-maintainer-limits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF101-102 and AppendixC110-112 align this call-off with G-Cloud12 effective11April2022, retrospectively and prospectively. New IP and specially written software shall be supplier-owned and licensed, not assigned. This changes the stated allocation; it does not establish that earlier ownership necessarily remained unchanged.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-ip-variation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "varies ownership and licensing across two call-offs",
            "sourceName": "Faculty102548 variationNo2 — disclosed copy",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC1-7 provides a buyer licence and authorised third-party use. The buyer must investigate evidenced misuse, use reasonable endeavours to secure correction and terminate the applicable sublicense for sustained breach, subject to procurement rules. These are terms, not observed exercises.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-buyer-licence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation provides perpetual buyer licence with misuse obligations",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC1 says the new IP/software shall be owned by the supplier, not assigned to the buyer, subject to a perpetual licence. This differs from technical direction. Execution is not established from the uncompleted visible copy; no absolute supplier veto is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-supplier-ip"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation allocates new IP and software ownership to supplier",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC4-5 permits use, adaptation and modification for buyer services. Third parties cannot exploit the IP for unrelated commercial benefit or build a competing commercial product from it. Permissions and limits are not proof of actual deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-maintainer-limits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permitted use serves buyer with commercial restrictions",
            "sourceName": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
      "label": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Variation permits third parties to maintain,host,develop/adapt forbuyer without directFaculty agreement. Other commercial exploitation/competing products restricted;actual appointment or repository access unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contractual role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
        "name": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
        "role": "Contractual role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Variation permits third parties to maintain,host,develop/adapt forbuyer without directFaculty agreement. Other commercial exploitation/competing products restricted;actual appointment or repository access unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Variation permits third parties to maintain,host,develop/adapt forbuyer without directFaculty agreement. Other commercial exploitation/competing products restricted;actual appointment or repository access unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Variation permits third parties to maintain,host,develop/adapt forbuyer without directFaculty agreement. Other commercial exploitation/competing products restricted;actual appointment or repository access unestablished.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractual role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC4-5 permits use, adaptation and modification for buyer services. Third parties cannot exploit the IP for unrelated commercial benefit or build a competing commercial product from it. Permissions and limits are not proof of actual deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-maintainer-limits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permitted use serves buyer with commercial restrictions",
            "sourceName": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
            "targetName": "CDDP retained licensed IP",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AppendixC2,4-5 allows maintenance, hosting, development and adaptation for the buyer without a direct licence or other agreement with Faculty. It does not prove any replacement contractor was appointed or that practical switching costs were low.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-authorise-maintainers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "variation permits buyer to authorise third-party services",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Buyer-authorised CDDP contractors",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-faculty102887",
      "label": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "No1 dated13December2022 prints cap1514650 after1264650;No2 dated1March2023/effective16January adds400000excludingVAT butprints1944650. GBP30000discrepancy is real in visible records;intervening terms unknown,notfraud or a corrected total.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contract variation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-faculty102887",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-faculty102887",
        "name": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
        "role": "Contract variation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "No1 dated13December2022 prints cap1514650 after1264650;No2 dated1March2023/effective16January adds400000excludingVAT butprints1944650. GBP30000discrepancy is real in visible records;intervening terms unknown,notfraud or a corrected total.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "No1 dated13December2022 prints cap1514650 after1264650;No2 dated1March2023/effective16January adds400000excludingVAT butprints1944650. GBP30000discrepancy is real in visible records;intervening terms unknown,notfraud or a corrected total."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "No1 dated13December2022 prints cap1514650 after1264650;No2 dated1March2023/effective16January adds400000excludingVAT butprints1944650. GBP30000discrepancy is real in visible records;intervening terms unknown,notfraud or a corrected total.",
        "structuralRole": "Contract variation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Variation102887No2 on PDF137 adds GBP400,000 excluding VAT in two GBP200,000 instalments against agreed outputs/functionality. Its printed total1,944,650 is30,000 above1,514,650 plus400,000. This is a visible-record discrepancy, not OCR. Intervening terms remain unknown; no spending aggregate, fraud finding or corrected total is asserted. Financial details: value: 400,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed variation fee excludingVAT;delivery/acceptancecondition; period: Dated1March2023;effective16January2023;paymentnotverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-fixed-fee-acceptance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies fixed fee payable against delivery and buyer acceptance",
            "sourceName": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF135/137 separate from102548. No1dated13December2022statesMVPcompleted30September2022;that contractstatementisnotanindependentacceptanceaudit. No2dated1March2023effective16January.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-dcms-trail"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named buyer in separate102887 variation trail",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "label": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Named buyer in2021business case,2022orders andMarch2023Faculty variation. Distinct historical party fromDSIT named inAugust2023variation; no blanket contract novation inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government department"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-dcms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "name": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
        "role": "Government department",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named buyer in2021business case,2022orders andMarch2023Faculty variation. Distinct historical party fromDSIT named inAugust2023variation; no blanket contract novation inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named buyer in2021business case,2022orders andMarch2023Faculty variation. Distinct historical party fromDSIT named inAugust2023variation; no blanket contract novation inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The former Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport appears here as the historical public buyer behind CDDP business planning, supplier orders and evaluation arrangements. Its dated contracting role is distinct from the later DSIT role.",
        "structuralRole": "Historical commissioner and acceptance authority",
        "significance": "The department linked policy needs to purchased tools, development and independent evaluation. Buyer acceptance and subcontractor approval are concrete points of authority: they influence which deliverables qualify for payment and which firms may join the supply chain. The released documents expose these mechanisms more clearly than they expose completed delivery.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Purchasing and approval mechanisms",
            "text": "The retained record includes an October 2021 CDDP business case, Faculty variation documents, and a NewsWhip monitoring-tool contract for 28 October 2022–27 October 2023. An evaluation order attributed to Oliver Wyman lists £656,000 excluding VAT across two phases as a tender or contract price. Payment terms require satisfactory deliverables, while key subcontractor identities in order 102548 are redacted. Accepted outputs, approved invoices and a blanket transfer of all these contracts to DSIT were not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-business-case",
              "w16-supp-e-newswhip-contract",
              "w33-con-e-owcommission",
              "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
              "w33-con-e-subapproval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Department inventory identifiesOliverWyman; order supplier fields redacted. VisiblePhaseI108400+PhaseII547600=656000GBPexVAT; tenderprice/firstyearliabilitybasis, not paid funds. Released copy does not establish signatures/execution. Financial details: value: 656,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed tender/contract price excluding VAT; not payment; period: 102384 phasesI/II Payment status: No payment record acquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-owcommission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oliver Wyman — inventory-identified CDDP evaluator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as commissioning evaluation through102384",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "Oliver Wyman — inventory-identified CDDP evaluator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "PDF143 names NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration485016, in contract103186 for real-time social/predictive news intelligence,28October2022-27October2023, with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge, payment, exercised extension or actual CDDP feed/deployment was established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-newswhip-contract"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NewsWhip Media Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed contract identifies monitoring-tool supplier",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "NewsWhip Media Limited",
            "date": "Contract stated28October2022-27October2023;optionalextensionnotverified"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "October2021 PDF1-2 SharedOutcomesFundcase,SROSarahConnolly,Discovery/Deliveryphases,misinformation/disinformation/manipulativebehaviour. Namedplan,not validatedperformance. Participatingdepartments/valuefields unreadable/redacted,notreconstructed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-business-case"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "business case proposes cross-government data-sharing capacity",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": "October2021 businesscase"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF135/137 separate from102548. No1dated13December2022statesMVPcompleted30September2022;that contractstatementisnotanindependentacceptanceaudit. No2dated1March2023effective16January.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-dcms-trail"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "named buyer in separate102887 variation trail",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "Faculty102887 variation trail — unreconciled totals",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "23September2021deliverylead account describes assurance of process/resources/spending/quality andseniorcivilservantreporting. No originalscopeagreement/finalassessment acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paevaluate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PA Consulting",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appointed PA as external OSDI evaluator",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "PA Consulting",
            "date": "2021-09-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "102548PDF120 says entry grants approval for listedkeysubcontractors; identities redacted. Separate102887NotApplicable field does not resolve this list. No PUBLICsubcontractedge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-subapproval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "102548 key-subcontractor approval field — redacted",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides written approval through the order-form mechanism",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "102548 key-subcontractor approval field — redacted",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Released payment/acceptance terms locate buyer review; no accepted deliverable, invoice approval or payment acquired. Date mismatch and empty signaturefields preserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-satisfaction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conditions payment in arrears on satisfactory deliverables",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-newswhip",
      "label": "NewsWhip Media Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Irish registration485016 in disclosed contract103186 forrealtime social/predictive media monitoring intelligence. Charge unread; no establishedCDDP ingestion,deployment or exercised extension.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w16-supp-newswhip",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-newswhip",
        "name": "NewsWhip Media Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Irish registration485016 in disclosed contract103186 forrealtime social/predictive media monitoring intelligence. Charge unread; no establishedCDDP ingestion,deployment or exercised extension.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Irish registration485016 in disclosed contract103186 forrealtime social/predictive media monitoring intelligence. Charge unread; no establishedCDDP ingestion,deployment or exercised extension."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "platform",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Irish registration485016 in disclosed contract103186 forrealtime social/predictive media monitoring intelligence. Charge unread; no establishedCDDP ingestion,deployment or exercised extension.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "PDF143 names NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration485016, in contract103186 for real-time social/predictive news intelligence,28October2022-27October2023, with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge, payment, exercised extension or actual CDDP feed/deployment was established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w16-supp-e-newswhip-contract"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed contract identifies monitoring-tool supplier",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "NewsWhip Media Limited",
            "date": "Contract stated28October2022-27October2023;optionalextensionnotverified"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
            "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
            "heading": "Original contracts released under FOI",
            "text": "Page 143 identifies NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration 485016, contract 103186 for real-time social/predictive media news monitoring intelligence, 28 October 2022–27 October 2023 with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge read. Pages 193–194 contain programme-success and milestone tables with almost no recoverable substantive cells; visual examination is needed before attributing absent text to redaction rather than extraction failure. Pages 109 and 112 mostly blank; page 113 is the next framework cover. The expert-evaluation material was located by text search on pages 34–35, 62–63, 89, 92 and 95 but is not yet substantively read.",
            "matched": [
              "NewsWhip Media Limited"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3d1e93d5098e9e50104a9828b1b299dd24790a40c9a3bfbd4e278003121053ea"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-tc",
      "label": "Tech Coalition",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Programme administrator. Member-supported resources, admission/compliance; legal funding allocations and full participant agreement not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-tc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-tc",
        "name": "Tech Coalition",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Programme administrator. Member-supported resources, admission/compliance; legal funding allocations and full participant agreement not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Programme administrator. Member-supported resources, admission/compliance; legal funding allocations and full participant agreement not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Tech Coalition operates child-safety programmes for technology companies, including Lantern signal sharing, Pathways capacity building and the paid Elevate advisory service. Its reported Lantern responsibilities include admission, compliance administration and database access.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme operator connecting shared signals, membership and capacity building",
        "significance": "The Coalition supplies coordination that individual companies would otherwise have to arrange separately: common participation requirements, shared investigative labels and access to programme infrastructure. Its role is operationally significant, but membership, licensing assistance, paid advice and Lantern participation remain distinct relationships with different conditions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Operating responsibilities and resources",
            "text": "The 2024 Lantern report says participation is free and funded by the Coalition and members, without allocating individual contributions. It describes an unnamed participant unable to meet compliance requirements that would not continue in 2025. The Coalition commissioned BSR's 2023 human-rights assessment and reported nine recommendations implemented. Pathways launched in July 2024; a December 2025 account reported 67 participant companies. Elevate offers separately priced, tailored advisory support without requiring membership. These published accounts establish programme roles, not a member's authority over another company's enforcement decisions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-funding",
              "w22-sig-e-admission",
              "w22-sig-e-compliance-consequence",
              "w22-sig-e-hria-commission",
              "w22-sig-e-hria-response",
              "w27-roost-e-tc-pathways",
              "w27-roost-e-tc-elevate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Membership is unnecessary; pricing depends on scope/expertise/support and is specified in a tailored proposal. No fixed fee, paid amount, executed scope or consultant approval right acquired. Separate from CCF Elevate and its Canadian award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tc-elevate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers tailored paid advisory and implementation support",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Programme gives Tech Coalition application/compliance administration and database-access authority; legal agreement follows acceptance. Executed agreement and individual votes not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-admission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "administers entry, compliance and database access",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Operator maintains official tags in collaboration with participants. Shared development process, not a named member veto or proof every proposal adopted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-admin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "maintains taxonomy with participants",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "BSR report identifies commissioned Lantern assessment, workApril–August 2023. Not certification/audit of later outcomes; no fee established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hria-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned Lantern human-rights assessment",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "BSR",
            "date": "WorkApril–August 2023; reportNovember 2023; contract dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "18 July 2024 launch described guidance and licensing opportunities. 18 December 2025 operator account reports 67 participant companies, five resources and two fireside chats; these are not ROOST deployment or independently measured outcome counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tc-pathways"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "launched and operates a capacity-building programme",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "date": "2024-07-18 – 2024-07-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Launch letter credits Coalition personnel and quotes Pathways capacity building. ROOST says it is not a corporate membership organization. No Coalition grant, Pathways software delivery or Lantern access follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tc-expertise"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was credited with child-safety expertise and capacity-building context",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "February 2026 company announcement names later membership and guidance/peer learning. Membership is not automatic Lantern access, a proved technology sublicense or any ROOST configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-stability-membership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
                "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stability AI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported subsequent Coalition membership",
            "sourceName": "Stability AI",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition",
            "date": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2024 report says participation is free and Tech Coalition and members fully fund Lantern. No allocated amount, payment ledger, individual contribution or donor instruction established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports member-supported programme funding",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Reportingyear 2024; funding interval unspecified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. This is the Tech Coalition capacity/support lane of the ROOST adoption run. It establishes a concrete support programme and published obligations, not a named ROOST deployment or a compulsory classification standard.",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Coalition"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6273aedc2e853c89fdc27776808c419082006f9e79e4faf94f5defe772d71d07"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Bounded primary-source pass, observed 9 September 2026. This is Tech Coalition's child-safety programme, not a similarly named political vendor. No canonical case changes. Acquisition stopped at this operational-record breakpoint; rights and remedy analysis is separately recorded in lantern-rights-review.md .",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Coalition"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fabe83ff2aa04a85a93f5c25ed7fca45acb162de7b37130e7f0f8df86cbcba11"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding",
            "heading": "Candidate relations and next decisive record",
            "text": "For integration, reuse the existing CCF, Columbia, Discord, OpenAI, Google, Roblox, Tech Coalition and other exact identities where they resolve. The meaningful new relationship types are incubation , advertised employer , named board/technical role , appoints , roadmap authority , merge/release authority , fundraising reported and collaboration/expertise reported . Avoid converting the entire roster into control edges. The Canadian edge remains a CCF award with an expected partnership purpose.",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Coalition"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aaee25f15220827d8229322b0ddf0e13a19b689c526a02ac1345910ed987ac5b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions",
            "heading": "Integration boundary and next discriminator",
            "text": "Precise supported relations are: Tech Coalition/member funding of Lantern without allocated amounts; Meta's in-kind hosting; Tech Coalition admission, access and programme-standard administration; participants' manual signal selection and shared taxonomy development; and recipients' own investigation and policy decisions. The 18-account outcome must remain attributed to the operator. No individual member's veto, mandatory recipient sanction, government membership, or donor instruction is established.",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Coalition"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e2f97b0ac2a71ffdfa28c806544df8b78120130c6534b2efae3b29b919970c90"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
            "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Tech Coalition coordinates child-safety work among technology companies. It operates Lantern, a programme for sharing investigative signals, and offers licensing, guidance and advisory routes that help companies adopt safety capabilities. It controls programme admission and maintains common participation requirements.",
          "structuralRole": "Coordinating shared signals and access to safety capabilities",
          "significance": "The Coalition supplies infrastructure that individual firms would otherwise have to arrange separately. Its membership, access rules and common labels help signals and tools move between companies, making it a consequential organizer of practical safety work.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Tech Coalition organizes cooperation among technology companies on child safety. Its role includes operating Lantern, a programme through which participating firms share investigative signals about suspected exploitation. It administers applications, compliance and database access, and maintains a signal taxonomy with participants. Those are continuing operational responsibilities, rather than simply a shared public declaration.",
            "The Coalition says Lantern participation is free and funded by the organization and its members. Its 2024 transparency report described an unnamed participant that could not meet compliance requirements and would not continue in 2025. Access therefore depends on meeting programme conditions. It also commissioned BSR's human-rights assessment of Lantern and published a response describing changes made and further work to pursue.",
            "A reported Block case illustrates the intended path from a shared signal to company action. The Coalition said the information helped Block identify eighteen Cash App accounts suspected of child-exploitation transactions; Block closed accounts, banned users and reported to authorities in that account. Block separately confirms Cash App's participation and investigative use. This shows why shared labels and investigative leads matter: they can become inputs to decisions about financial access.",
            "The Coalition also helps spread technical capacity. Its Pathways programme provides guidance and licensing opportunities, and its January 2025 announcement expanded the PhotoDNA licensing route to members and non-members. Elevate offers separately priced advisory and implementation support. Across these programmes, the institution helps companies acquire knowledge, software and common procedures. Understanding its influence means looking at who receives access, what participation requires and how each receiving company uses the resulting capability."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
              "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
              "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
              "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "Lantern",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A Tech Coalition programme through which participating companies share signals concerning online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
      "aliases": [
        "Tech Coalition",
        "signals",
        "Meta",
        "Xbox"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Cross-platform safety information"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-lantern",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "name": "Lantern",
        "role": "Cross-platform safety information",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "A Tech Coalition programme through which participating companies share signals concerning online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
        "why": "It is a concrete example of one company’s information prompting another company to investigate and act. The receiving company still makes its own decision.",
        "about": [
          "The 2025 transparency report describes Meta sharing signals followed by investigation and action at Cash App and Xbox. These are the operators’ reported outcomes; the investigation did not obtain the underlying case files.",
          "Programme rules address recourse and removal of information that is no longer relevant. Whether a correction actually travels through all recipients and restores an account requires a separate operational record. The case study does not establish a connection to Steam removals."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Tech Coalition",
          "signals",
          "Meta",
          "Xbox"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A Tech Coalition programme through which participating companies share signals concerning online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared safety signals passed between participating firms",
        "significance": "Lantern is an information-sharing programme through which participating firms can pass signals to one another. The consequential step is how a receiving firm assesses a signal and acts on it, including what opportunity exists to correct an error.",
        "background": [
          "The 2025 transparency report describes Meta sharing signals followed by investigation and action at Cash App and Xbox. These are the operators’ reported outcomes; the investigation did not obtain the underlying case files.",
          "Programme rules address recourse and removal of information that is no longer relevant. Whether a correction actually travels through all recipients and restores an account requires a separate operational record. The case study does not establish a connection to Steam removals."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2024 report requires appeals/recourse, removal of signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notification to Tech Coalition. This is an existing remedy/removal process; downstream recipient notification, reopening and export correction remain unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-removal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern participating companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires recourse, relevant signals and TC notification",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Rules require manual review before upload and recipient investigation before own enforcement. Lantern says it does not facilitate automated enforcement based on signals. Safeguards are stated requirements, not independently audited compliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-own-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern participating companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires review and own-policy decisions",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Uploads need official tag and review/severity context. Taxonomy supports policy investigations, not legal determinations; supplemental tags cannot stand alone. No general political-speech/payments scope inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies required investigation labels",
            "sourceName": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Programme gives Tech Coalition application/compliance administration and database-access authority; legal agreement follows acceptance. Executed agreement and individual votes not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-admission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "administers entry, compliance and database access",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2025 report says companies may delete only signals they uploaded. Does not prove no administrator can remove signals. Aggregate removals do not identify error corrections or reinstatements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-remove-own"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern participating companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits participant deletion to own uploads",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "14 May 2026 announcement extends individually evaluated eligibility worldwide, prioritizing P2 P payments; receive-only. Eligibility is not actual enrolment of every institution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-finance-expansion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Worldwide financial eligibility — receive only",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced worldwide eligibility expansion",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Worldwide financial eligibility — receive only",
            "date": "Announcement 14 May 2026; individual enrolment dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Reports August 2024–first half 2025 pilot: Cash App,MEGA,Meta,PayPal,Snap,Western Union;1935 signals,108 financial investigations, some ongoing. Investigations/reports are not convictions; full report not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports receive-only financial pilot",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; exact days unknown. Accountpublished 17 July 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Block publication confirms active Cash App participation and investigator use to assess detection/product/risk controls. Does not independently confirm 18-account case; overall NCMEC counts are not Lantern totals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-block-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
                "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports investigative use through Cash App",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Document 10 September 2025; use interval unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions",
            "heading": "Read scope and custody",
            "text": "The old /lantern/ route failed in the reader; the site's actual /programs/lantern/ route succeeded. The financial-expansion reader timed out once; an ordinary GET substitute succeeded. Root's closed BSR PDF GET failure was not retried; its selected reader passages remain under the separate rights packet's custody. No private account or dataset was accessed.",
            "matched": [
              "Lantern"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "44e4d2e9cb96e2e789afd8b83fc8f64b9685911678f2da125316379250ea4740"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions",
            "heading": "Integration boundary and next discriminator",
            "text": "Precise supported relations are: Tech Coalition/member funding of Lantern without allocated amounts; Meta's in-kind hosting; Tech Coalition admission, access and programme-standard administration; participants' manual signal selection and shared taxonomy development; and recipients' own investigation and policy decisions. The 18-account outcome must remain attributed to the operator. No individual member's veto, mandatory recipient sanction, government membership, or donor instruction is established.",
            "matched": [
              "Lantern"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e2f97b0ac2a71ffdfa28c806544df8b78120130c6534b2efae3b29b919970c90"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
            "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance",
            "heading": "Current published operational boundary",
            "text": "Original: lantern-report2025.pdf,836595 bytes,SHA256f6667366d192a4582ab5d6e6ea2115a1772ca3312229a4e48bdc18b68d21bc5d. Hubble's lantern.md carries broader report scope and numerical discrepancies. Do not treat both readings as independent evidentiary origins.",
            "matched": [
              "Lantern"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "85646eeb9743dc11e7d76826a193dae7d6c47663245bcf0da491f05dd3d36820"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol",
            "title": "Correction is supported in the client; reversal of consequences remains unverified",
            "heading": "Meaning for this investigation",
            "text": "A local dataset refresh is not itself an account restoration. The inspected code addresses fetched signal state and opinions. It supplies no evidence of Lantern-specific reversal of Cash App closures, Xbox restrictions or any Steam action. This is a boundary on the current evidence, not a repository-wide claim that no related software could implement restoration.",
            "matched": [
              "Lantern"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e0a764797a5752ca233c5b5943cc393a033b8f1b8b445616e2998355f8f89623"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-participants",
      "label": "Lantern participating companies",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Collective participant role, not a legal person or proof identical upload rights. Financial institutions currently receive only.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-participants",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-participants",
        "name": "Lantern participating companies",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Collective participant role, not a legal person or proof identical upload rights. Financial institutions currently receive only.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Collective participant role, not a legal person or proof identical upload rights. Financial institutions currently receive only."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lantern participants are companies admitted to the Tech Coalition's child-safety signal-sharing programme. The collective covers different operational roles: financial institutions are described as receiving signals, while uploading companies contribute reviewed indicators under programme rules.",
        "structuralRole": "Distributed investigators with their own enforcement policies",
        "significance": "Participation connects investigations across services without assigning every recipient the same action. The design relies on both the uploader's judgement and the recipient's own review. That distribution can aid detection but makes correction depend on more than deleting an original record from the shared system.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Review and correction duties",
            "text": "Published reports require manual review before upload, recipient investigation before enforcement, and appeals or recourse. Companies must remove signals that are no longer applicable or relevant and notify Tech Coalition. The 2025 report says companies can delete only signals they uploaded. Aggregate removal counts do not distinguish errors from retention expiry, and the retained material does not establish downstream reopening or notification to every prior recipient.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-own-review",
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-removal",
              "w22-sig-e-remove-own"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2024 report requires appeals/recourse, removal of signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notification to Tech Coalition. This is an existing remedy/removal process; downstream recipient notification, reopening and export correction remain unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-removal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires recourse, relevant signals and TC notification",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Rules require manual review before upload and recipient investigation before own enforcement. Lantern says it does not facilitate automated enforcement based on signals. Safeguards are stated requirements, not independently audited compliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-own-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires review and own-policy decisions",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2025 report says companies may delete only signals they uploaded. Does not prove no administrator can remove signals. Aggregate removals do not identify error corrections or reinstatements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-remove-own"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits participant deletion to own uploads",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Companies may propose updates; particular proposal/approval records and accepted changes unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may propose taxonomy updates",
            "sourceName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "targetName": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
      "label": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Investigation labels may cover platform-policy violations without legal determination. Supplemental tags cannot stand alone. Steam tag is not membership or sanctions evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-taxonomy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
        "name": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Investigation labels may cover platform-policy violations without legal determination. Supplemental tags cannot stand alone. Steam tag is not membership or sanctions evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Investigation labels may cover platform-policy violations without legal determination. Supplemental tags cannot stand alone. Steam tag is not membership or sanctions evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Lantern signal taxonomy is the programme's maintained set of investigation labels. Uploads require official tags and review or severity context; supplemental tags cannot serve as the sole classification.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared vocabulary for child-safety investigations",
        "significance": "A common vocabulary makes signals interpretable across services, while the meaning of a label can shape what recipients investigate. The labels can concern conduct prohibited by platform rules without establishing illegality. Taxonomy governance is therefore a different question from either criminal adjudication or a recipient's final account decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who maintains the labels",
            "text": "Tech Coalition maintains the official taxonomy in collaboration with participants, and companies may propose updates. The public reports do not identify a particular member's veto or a completed proposal-and-approval history. A cross-platform tag such as Steam is a descriptive tag, not evidence that the named service participates in Lantern or imposed a specific sanction.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-admin",
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-input",
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Uploads need official tag and review/severity context. Taxonomy supports policy investigations, not legal determinations; supplemental tags cannot stand alone. No general political-speech/payments scope inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies required investigation labels",
            "sourceName": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Operator maintains official tags in collaboration with participants. Shared development process, not a named member veto or proof every proposal adopted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-admin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "maintains taxonomy with participants",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Companies may propose updates; particular proposal/approval records and accepted changes unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern participating companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may propose taxonomy updates",
            "sourceName": "Lantern participating companies",
            "targetName": "Lantern signal taxonomy",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-pilot",
      "label": "Lantern financial pilot",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "August 2024–first half 2025 pilot; six named participants,1935 signals and 108 investigations reported, some ongoing. Full pilot report offered to members/participants, not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-pilot",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-pilot",
        "name": "Lantern financial pilot",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "August 2024–first half 2025 pilot; six named participants,1935 signals and 108 investigations reported, some ongoing. Full pilot report offered to members/participants, not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "August 2024–first half 2025 pilot; six named participants,1935 signals and 108 investigations reported, some ongoing. Full pilot report offered to members/participants, not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lantern's financial pilot tested child-safety signal sharing between technology services and financial companies from August 2024 through the first half of 2025. Tech Coalition names Cash App, MEGA, Meta, PayPal, Snap and Western Union as its six participants.",
        "structuralRole": "Trial bridge from platform signals to financial investigations",
        "significance": "The pilot shows a specific route by which information from online services can enter financial investigations. Its reported counts describe investigative activity rather than findings of guilt. This is a useful operational bridge to follow because financial access decisions occur at recipients after signal sharing.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported activity",
            "text": "The operator reports 1,935 signals and 108 financial investigations, with some investigations still ongoing. Financial participants received signals rather than uploading them under the described arrangement. The full pilot report was offered to members and participants but was not acquired for this investigation. Nothing in the retained pilot record connects PayPal's participation to earlier itch.io restrictions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot",
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-cashapp",
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Reports August 2024–first half 2025 pilot: Cash App,MEGA,Meta,PayPal,Snap,Western Union;1935 signals,108 financial investigations, some ongoing. Investigations/reports are not convictions; full report not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports receive-only financial pilot",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; exact days unknown. Accountpublished 17 July 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Operator identifies PayPal among six; no connection to prior itch.io restrictions established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named as pilot participant",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Operator identifies Cash App among six; financial participants receive only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-cashapp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named as pilot participant",
            "sourceName": "Cash App",
            "targetName": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-financial-eligibility",
      "label": "Worldwide financial eligibility — receive only",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "14 May 2026 announcement extends eligibility to individually evaluated institutions; not universal bank enrolment or financial uploads.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-financial-eligibility",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-financial-eligibility",
        "name": "Worldwide financial eligibility — receive only",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "14 May 2026 announcement extends eligibility to individually evaluated institutions; not universal bank enrolment or financial uploads.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "14 May 2026 announcement extends eligibility to individually evaluated institutions; not universal bank enrolment or financial uploads."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "14 May 2026 announcement extends eligibility to individually evaluated institutions; not universal bank enrolment or financial uploads.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "14 May 2026 announcement extends individually evaluated eligibility worldwide, prioritizing P2 P payments; receive-only. Eligibility is not actual enrolment of every institution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-finance-expansion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced worldwide eligibility expansion",
            "sourceName": "Lantern",
            "targetName": "Worldwide financial eligibility — receive only",
            "date": "Announcement 14 May 2026; individual enrolment dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-noncontinuation",
      "label": "Reported participant non-continuation",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2024 report says unnamed participant unable to meet compliance would not continue in 2025. Identity and executed revocation date unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-noncontinuation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-noncontinuation",
        "name": "Reported participant non-continuation",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "2024 report says unnamed participant unable to meet compliance would not continue in 2025. Identity and executed revocation date unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 report says unnamed participant unable to meet compliance would not continue in 2025. Identity and executed revocation date unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2024 report says unnamed participant unable to meet compliance would not continue in 2025. Identity and executed revocation date unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2024 report describes unnamed company unable to meet compliance and says it would not continue in 2025; identity and actual revocation date unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-compliance-consequence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a participant would not continue",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Reported participant non-continuation",
            "date": "Reportfor 2024 refers to 2025 non-continuation; effective date unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "Block",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company publication identifies Tech Coalition membership and Cash App participation. Case outcomes remain attributed; no adjacent donor allocation inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-block",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-block",
        "name": "Block",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Company publication identifies Tech Coalition membership and Cash App participation. Case outcomes remain attributed; no adjacent donor allocation inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company publication identifies Tech Coalition membership and Cash App participation. Case outcomes remain attributed; no adjacent donor allocation inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
            "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 27
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Block is the company identified in this collection as Cash App’s contracting operator and a Tech Coalition member. Its publications, terms and regulatory records connect payment services with safety investigations, account restrictions and consumer remedies.",
        "structuralRole": "Payment access, investigative signals and regulatory remedies",
        "significance": "Block connects Cash App’s operational decisions with company-wide policy, cross-platform safety cooperation and public enforcement. Its cases show both the reach of private account controls and the ways a regulator can require changes to restriction and appeal procedures.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD 80 m settlement comprises USD 79.075 m penalty and USD 925,000 state administrative costs, payable 20 calendar days after payment instructions. Block later expected payment by/about February 2025; no receipt acquired. Costs are neither consultant fees nor consumer redress. Covered-conduct release is conditioned on full payment. Financial details: value: 80,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement obligation; no payment receipt established; period: 20 calendar days after receipt of payment instructions",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-obligation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owes separate penalty and administrative costs",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "117 requires USD 75 m reserved or in segregated deposit within 10 calendar days; consumer redress capped at USD 120 m. If consumer redress is below USD 75 m, specified shortfall goes to CFPB, with possible further redress/Treasury residue. Neither figure proves cash received by consumers or actual reserve establishment. Financial details: value: 75,000,000; currency: USD; kind: ordered reserve or segregated-deposit obligation; not observed payment; period: Within 10 calendar days of order effective date",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-redress-reserve"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must reserve funds for ordered redress",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oregon48 allocates USD 264,153.73 from the same USD 45m state pool to NAAG for participating states investigation costs/expenses, by wire using Oregon instructions. Agreed entitlement, not observed payment, a separate fine, named judgment creditor or proof of allocation to any fund or letter campaign. Financial details: value: 264,153.73; currency: USD; kind: agreed reimbursement allocation inside USD 45m pool; not additional or paid; period: July 2026 agreement; stated payment within 30 days",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed investigation-expense reimbursement allocation",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "II.D.8: company Compliance Management Committee must notify state Executive Committee within 10 calendar days after becoming aware of replacement need. Block must notify that committee within 10 calendar days AFTER making its selection, then engage the replacement within 30 calendar days of selection notification. No 10-day selection deadline is stated. Replacement must be qualified, independent and unaffiliated; no named firm, initial appointment method or express state veto established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-replacement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "selects replacement subject to independence and notice",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Where the State determines material failure and, in its sole discretion, no health/safety/welfare threat, it will notify before legal action. Block has 15 business days for a good-faith written response, potentially describing ongoing correction/timetable; not necessarily a completed cure. Only enumerated duties sunset at five years, direct education at seven; not whole-judgment expiry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed a conditional notice and response process",
            "sourceName": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notice-of-Error evidence rights and credit timing have their own trigger, including no required contact with the P2P recipient/law enforcement before investigation. Fraud controls also identify suspected scam accounts and prevent operation/return. Neither universal closure-document access nor a prescribed Lantern supplier follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-errors-fraud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets distinct transfer-error and anti-fraud duties",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Literal deadline By June 30, 2026 precedes stipulated effective date. Prompt notice, access information, review and reasonable restoration efforts have appropriateness/legal-prohibition qualifications. Flexible language does not say it replaces CFPB 24h notice/10-business-day appeal rules; breach or intent not inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-restriction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets agreed restriction-review procedures",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Qualified committee, documented compliance management, training and quarterly Board reporting. Annual compliance report must be prepared and committee-approved, available to state on request. Not CFPB annual sworn Board-approved submission or an observed outside monitor. Existing adequate procedures may satisfy terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-corporate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July required company compliance committee/report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed to maintain internal compliance oversight",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "July required company compliance committee/report",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded agreement lane; no customer account, support contact, private API, historical contract reconstruction or enforceability opinion. The main instrument is the agreement with Block, Inc. It grants service-access and fund-access discretion separately. Neither contractual power proves why any particular account was closed, nor does closure itself establish loss of ownership of the remaining money.",
            "matched": [
              "Block"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1678132c68adb634ba713d5d70dfba2f1bee2808114bb2e0b97ec59a87b6f57a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits",
            "heading": "Parties, examination and allegation boundaries",
            "text": "The order names Block, Inc., formerly Square, Inc., NMLS 942933 , as the company operating Cash App. The other parties are participating states' money-transmission regulatory agencies. CSBS and MTRA supply coordination protocols, and the states work through the Multi-State MSB Examination Taskforce (MMET); they are not additional company respondents or substituted state enforcement authorities. Jack Dorsey signs for Block as Block Head and Chairperson (Maine PDF11), not as a separately named personal respondent.",
            "matched": [
              "Block"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9adc324324733733fc614364f8d34a749f38b89035c94fc55089af647fd1e661"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
            "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved",
            "heading": "Respondent's position and limits",
            "text": "Official SEC submission metadata was captured successfully to identify filings. Ordinary GETs of the2025K,2026Q2 and Block-response pages returned403; these routes are closed. Their saved HTML files are explicitly error responses, not retained originals. The primary web reader worked and provided the scoped substantive passages above. Investor filing-list pages rendered only navigation, so the successful public SEC metadata route supplied exact filing addresses. No challenge bypass or authenticated route was used.",
            "matched": [
              "Block"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7933873b8385ffdb6852e26607b83264c94a7a9b1c6711c38c80f354c6d1322b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits",
            "heading": "Parties, examination and allegation boundaries",
            "text": "CSBS's release describes due-diligence, identity-verification, suspicious-activity reporting and high-risk-account requirements, and says regulators found noncompliance with certain requirements. Those explanatory categories must not be silently turned into an enumerated, proved list of specific Block failures: the public order refers to the underlying ROE without setting those particulars out. Likewise, the broad list of practices covered by the release in V.C is a release definition, not a separate finding that every listed practice failed.",
            "matched": [
              "Block"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0c0cd9bf9d1da8c6a4ddb0633a141d9f83733235b9a68d6feb60e86ac96aa636"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
            "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
            "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
            "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Block operates Cash App and participates in shared child-safety investigations through Lantern. Its records show both the broad contractual power a payment company holds over accounts and the ability of regulators to require notices, appeals, fraud controls and substantial financial remedies.",
          "structuralRole": "Payment-account control subject to public enforcement and remedies",
          "significance": "Block makes the struggle over practical authority unusually visible. The company can restrict access to money; regulators can then order it to improve the reasons, review processes and protections surrounding those decisions. Safety cooperation and consumer rights meet inside the same operation.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Block is the company behind Cash App. It controls a service people use to send, receive and hold money, which makes its decisions about account eligibility and restrictions particularly consequential. Its US terms reserve powers to suspend or terminate accounts, delay transfers and impose holds for risk investigations or legal process. These powers sit inside an everyday consumer product.",
            "The company also participates in Lantern, the Tech Coalition's child-safety signal-sharing programme. In one published case, the Coalition said shared information helped Block identify eighteen Cash App accounts suspected of child-exploitation transactions. It reported account closures, user bans and reports to authorities. Block separately confirms Cash App investigators' use of Lantern. This shows how information received through an industry programme can contribute to an institution's decision about financial access.",
            "Public authorities have also challenged Block's treatment of customers. A January 2025 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau order described inadequate restriction notices, difficult-to-find appeals and slow reconsideration. It required clearer notice and appeal procedures, including decisions within ten business days, alongside fraud controls and internal oversight. Block disputed the agency's characterization of historical practices while reporting payment of the $55 million civil penalty.",
            "The same regulatory framework can demand both exclusion of suspected fraud accounts and fairer treatment of people whose access is restricted. That makes Block a particularly useful case for the larger picture. Companies control the operational systems, while public authorities can force changes to the procedures those systems must follow. The result depends on the signal used, the company's decision and the availability of a remedy when that decision is challenged."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
              "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
            },
            {
              "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
              "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
              "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
              "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
            },
            {
              "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
              "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-cashapp",
      "label": "Cash App",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A consumer payments service operated by Block, appearing in both cross-platform safety reporting and regulatory action over customer restrictions.",
      "aliases": [
        "Block",
        "CashApp",
        "CFPB"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Payments platform operated by Block"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-cashapp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-cashapp",
        "name": "Cash App",
        "role": "Payments platform operated by Block",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "A consumer payments service operated by Block, appearing in both cross-platform safety reporting and regulatory action over customer restrictions.",
        "why": "It provides two views of power: the platform can act on information from another company, and a regulator can constrain how it restricts customers.",
        "about": [
          "A Lantern case study reports Meta signals followed by Cash App investigation and action. The underlying case files were not inspected.",
          "Separately, the January 2025 CFPB order requires specified notices and appeals to be decided within ten business days, with status changed as appropriate. It creates duties; it does not establish that every restricted customer regained access."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Block",
          "CashApp",
          "CFPB"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A consumer payments service operated by Block, appearing in both cross-platform safety reporting and regulatory action over customer restrictions.",
        "structuralRole": "The account where policy becomes a practical restriction",
        "significance": "Cash App is a useful place to see the consequences of the wider structure. Investigative information, company terms and regulator-imposed remedies meet at an individual’s ability to use an account and contest its restriction.",
        "background": [
          "A Lantern case study reports Meta signals followed by Cash App investigation and action. The underlying case files were not inspected.",
          "Separately, the January 2025 CFPB order requires specified notices and appeals to be decided within ten business days, with status changed as appropriate. It creates duties; it does not establish that every restricted customer regained access."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Help directs customers to Support, then an eligibility screen and appropriate team; says up to 10 days, without specifying business days. It describes cash-out/pending-deposit routes but cannot establish unconditional withdrawal, actual performance or an external bank-account closure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-help-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
                "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App closure-help procedure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes Support and eligible-case review route",
            "sourceName": "Cash App",
            "targetName": "Cash App closure-help procedure",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "VI.3 says balances are separate from corporate funds and accessed through Cash App, not directly at custodial banks/brokerages. Limited agency/custody arrangement does not prove Block ownership of funds or that a custodial bank directed a closure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-custody-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App US customer accounts",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must use Cash App to access custodial balances under terms",
            "sourceName": "Cash App US customer accounts",
            "targetName": "Cash App",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Tech Coalition says Block closed 18 Cash App accounts, banned users and reported to authorities in this case. Later arrests attributed to unnamed police confirmation; no independent docket, findings or wrongful-action rate established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-cashapp-outcome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "closed 18 accounts in the reported case",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Cash App",
            "date": "Exact action dates unknown; reportfor 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Block says Cash App regularly involved in ICMEC-led US coalition. Wording does not establish formal membership/vote or ICMEC control of Lantern.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-icmec-involvement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
                "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports regular involvement in US coalition",
            "sourceName": "Cash App",
            "targetName": "ICMEC financial coalition",
            "date": "Document 10 September 2025; involvement interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Operator identifies Cash App among six; financial participants receive only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-pilot-cashapp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "named as pilot participant",
            "sourceName": "Cash App",
            "targetName": "Lantern financial pilot",
            "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
            "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "An ambiguous final sentence says an account opened and linked to a closed Cash App account will also close. The account type is not specified there. Do not interpret it as Cash App closing an external bank account, or add a causal edge without clarification from an authoritative instrument.",
            "matched": [
              "Cash App"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "00e47b872c9311e750f53132ebfa3a53c437e4ec4d3bdd624412945ba2d5c239"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances",
            "heading": "What this changes, and what remains missing",
            "text": "The public instruments establish a service-mediated path to money and a broad internal decision space. Competing explanations remain live: fraud/risk protection, compliance with an external obligation, enforcement of Cash App's own acceptable-use choices, or a mistaken decision. The contract alone cannot choose among them. Reinstatement review and balance release also remain different outcomes.",
            "matched": [
              "Cash App"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "125c0e5f7f3c89e54450ce526022159bc33543b250a2c88e49550b2157f7c095"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances",
            "heading": "Bank roles and reconsideration",
            "text": "The terms distinguish the Cash App service contract from a cardholder's agreement with the issuing bank; that bank agreement governs card use/bank relationship in an inconsistency (VIII.1–2, text 620–626). No individual customer's product/card agreement was obtained, and no bank-specific closure authority is asserted here. Custodial placement, card issuance and an instruction to close are different relations.",
            "matched": [
              "Cash App"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6d1f0454ba8ef0f97e3fc8c7a1f62707a206f589bfb288c136aed6b3dfc52023"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
            "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App's obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See the regulator packet . This narrows the earlier procedural gap; actual compliance, applicable modifications and a Lantern-specific correction/remedy trace remain unestablished. The original source-specific analysis below is preserved.",
            "matched": [
              "Cash App"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e02bf914eeca0d0db9f9e9ab142064343ca7362e3f4c1fb4a97fe9aa024eee59"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
            "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-case2025",
      "label": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Operator report: police request→Meta investigation→signals→Block 18 Cash App closures and Microsoft Xbox action. No underlying case file read; exact dates unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-case2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-case2025",
        "name": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Operator report: police request→Meta investigation→signals→Block 18 Cash App closures and Microsoft Xbox action. No underlying case file read; exact dates unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Operator report: police request→Meta investigation→signals→Block 18 Cash App closures and Microsoft Xbox action. No underlying case file read; exact dates unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Operator report: police request→Meta investigation→signals→Block 18 Cash App closures and Microsoft Xbox action. No underlying case file read; exact dates unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Police request prompted Meta own investigation and NCMEC report in described child-exploitation case; not direct government membership/upload.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-meta-case"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "conducted investigation, operator reports",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
            "date": "Reportfor 2025; exact investigation dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Same case says Microsoft acted on several Xbox accounts. No exact count/case file; does not establish every participant or Steam took action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "acted on Xbox accounts, operator reports",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
            "date": "Exact action dates unknown; reportfor 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Case study says Meta shared signals through Lantern. Private signals and underlying case file not inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-case-signals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "generated shared Meta signals, operator reports",
            "sourceName": "Reported Meta → financial/Xbox case",
            "targetName": "Lantern",
            "date": "Case timing unknown; reportfor 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
            "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-bsr",
      "label": "BSR",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Author of commissioned 2023 HRIA. Assessed risks and commitments are not an audit of later outcomes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-bsr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-bsr",
        "name": "BSR",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Author of commissioned 2023 HRIA. Assessed risks and commitments are not an audit of later outcomes.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Author of commissioned 2023 HRIA. Assessed risks and commitments are not an audit of later outcomes."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "BSR produced a commissioned human-rights impact assessment of Lantern, the Tech Coalition's child-safety signal-sharing programme. Its April–August 2023 assessment examined how programme design could affect people across participating services.",
        "structuralRole": "External assessor of shared-signal risks and safeguards",
        "significance": "BSR supplies a vocabulary for assessing consequences that individual platform statistics can miss. An erroneous signal can produce several separate exclusions and several appeal burdens. That analysis identifies where programme governance needs correction and review mechanisms, without turning predicted risks into evidence of actual wrongful cases.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope of the assessment",
            "text": "The November 2023 report discusses decontextualised signals, cumulative exclusions, legal pressure, review resources and dependence on Meta infrastructure. It is explicitly not an audit or certification, and predates later financial integration. Tech Coalition subsequently reported implementing nine of nineteen recommendations and pursuing or investigating ten. The retained research also identifies later commissioned reviews of financial participation and AI-related signals, but not their full findings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hria-commission",
              "w22-sig-e-hria-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Describes commitments and risks: decontextualized signals, cumulative exclusions and separate-company appeals. Assessed risks are not observed wrongdoing; scope predates financial integration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hria-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published human-rights risk assessment",
            "sourceName": "BSR",
            "targetName": "Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)",
            "date": "ReportNovember 2023; day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Scoped assessment emphasized future organizational risks and recommended appeals, holds, external review and downstream transparency. It is not a current incident finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-bsr-assessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conducted the assessment with editorial control",
            "sourceName": "BSR",
            "targetName": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "date": "2021 assessment; no original after the recorded 403."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "BSR report identifies commissioned Lantern assessment, workApril–August 2023. Not certification/audit of later outcomes; no fee established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hria-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned Lantern human-rights assessment",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "BSR",
            "date": "WorkApril–August 2023; reportNovember 2023; contract dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
            "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance",
            "heading": "The commissioned assessment",
            "text": "BSR warns that decontextualized or erroneous signals can produce cumulative exclusions, requiring separate appeals to each company (PDF25–30). It identifies resource and legal-pressure risks that can undermine review, and dependence on Meta's infrastructure. These are assessed risks, not proven wrongful cases. Its April–August 2023 work predates later financial integration. The report disclaims audit/certification status.",
            "matched": [
              "BSR"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e0e3736d2c8330ec3696751663a65e08865f5b64d8fdb14f7e71359924e2da1c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
            "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance",
            "heading": "Current published operational boundary",
            "text": "The report describes commissioned BSR reviews of financial participation and AI-related signals, but not their full findings. It states companies may delete only signals they uploaded, and gives aggregate removals without reasons that separate error correction from retention expiry. Own-policy review is required; shared taxonomy can cover conduct prohibited by platform rules without establishing illegality. The listed cross-platform tags include Steam; a tag is not proof of Steam participation or a particular Steam sanction.",
            "matched": [
              "BSR"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b0660f07f8910b5cb5418488425c2d12a8e42c822d630a6eb6a31e5b9c05ff19"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
            "title": "Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
            "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-hria2023",
      "label": "Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "November 2023 report from April–August work; shared-input/fragmented-remedy risks. Predates later financial integration. Scoped reader only.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-hria2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-hria2023",
        "name": "Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "November 2023 report from April–August work; shared-input/fragmented-remedy risks. Predates later financial integration. Scoped reader only.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "November 2023 report from April–August work; shared-input/fragmented-remedy risks. Predates later financial integration. Scoped reader only."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "November 2023 report from April–August work; shared-input/fragmented-remedy risks. Predates later financial integration. Scoped reader only.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Describes commitments and risks: decontextualized signals, cumulative exclusions and separate-company appeals. Assessed risks are not observed wrongdoing; scope predates financial integration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hria-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published human-rights risk assessment",
            "sourceName": "BSR",
            "targetName": "Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)",
            "date": "ReportNovember 2023; day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "7 November 2023 response says 9 of 19 implemented and 10 pursued/investigated. Operator assertion, not independent verification or proof end-to-end remedy works.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-hria-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported nine recommendations implemented",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)",
            "date": "Response 7 November 2023; individual implementation dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
            "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "label": "Checkstep",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Moderation workflow provider; public specification/terms describe customer-specific decisions and training permission. No particular executed contract/deployment observed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-checkstep",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "name": "Checkstep",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Moderation workflow provider; public specification/terms describe customer-specific decisions and training permission. No particular executed contract/deployment observed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Moderation workflow provider; public specification/terms describe customer-specific decisions and training permission. No particular executed contract/deployment observed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Checkstep provides moderation workflows that combine scanner outputs, customer policies and human review. In its documented integration with Sightengine, classification scores become inputs to decisions that a customer platform can implement through event notifications.",
        "structuralRole": "Translator from classification scores to customer moderation actions",
        "significance": "Checkstep occupies the point where a model's output can become operational: customer settings and review determine whether content or an account is acted upon. The interface supports restoration and appeal events as well as restrictions. This makes policy configuration and the customer's implementation consequential parts of the chain.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Workflow and data permissions",
            "text": "Published integration documentation describes decisions to remove, restore or keep content down, and human author decisions to suspend, terminate or restore accounts. Customers must implement the event handler. Terms identify the customer as controller and Checkstep as processor; clause 5.5 permits customer-data use for service machine learning subject to an email opt-out. These published capabilities and permissions do not establish a particular customer's settings, accepted contract or training use. The documented integration is not a shared cross-customer offender register.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              },
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-classifier-workflow",
              "w22-sig-e-webhook-decisions",
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-events",
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-training",
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-controller"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms 14 identify contracting party as controller,Checkstep processor; instructions/protected subprocessors/referred requests. Termination 30 days is backup-request window, not universal deletion deadline. Executed terms unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-controller"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains controller role under published terms",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Checkstep",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "decision can remove/restore/keep content down; human author-decision can suspend/terminate/restore accounts, with content removal depending on decision. Customer must implement handler. Capability, not observed enforcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-webhook-decisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can return content and account action instructions",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms 5.5 permit Customer Data for service ML and treat it as customer instruction, subject to email opt-out. No anonymization condition in clause; actual training, pooling, acceptance/opt-out unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes opt-out customer-data ML permission",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Coauthored guide describes scores entering Checkstep workflow; PUBLIC calls example signal sharing. Not shared offender list, universal no-external-processing guarantee or observed customer deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-classifier-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes supplying classification outputs",
            "sourceName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "targetName": "Checkstep",
            "date": "Currentguide observed 9 September 2026; historical version unknown. PUBLICpublished 26 March 2026 citesguideas 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "incident-closed includes overturned/upheld; restoration and notification events described. No successful appeal, independent adjudication or correction across unrelated platforms established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-events"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can return appeal and restoration events",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Content/reference access and metadata feed selected scanners and policy-linked decisions for customer platform. No shared cross-customer restriction register established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer moderation workflow",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents configurable moderation workflow",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Customer moderation workflow",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces",
            "heading": "Result",
            "text": "PUBLIC's example is documented as an integration of moderation vendors. The observed path is a customer submitting content for analysis, Sightengine returning classification scores, Checkstep applying the customer's configured policy, and a decision event returning to that customer's platform. The records do not establish a shared list of restricted people or automatic propagation of one platform's ban to another.",
            "matched": [
              "Checkstep"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9bfddcfda1411b10c15787bc3157f52df4f61b61294ed6e9d5645897ae5d42b5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces",
            "heading": "Result",
            "text": "The distinction does not make the interface inconsequential: it can carry instructions that remove content or suspend an account. It also does not establish zero reuse. The published contracts contain two different machine-learning permissions: Checkstep's customer-data permission with an opt-out, and Sightengine's voluntary feedback-data route with a separate controller role and retention exception. Permission and actual use remain separate evidence states.",
            "matched": [
              "Checkstep"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6e8703962f8881c2bb56a60cdfd690648831c29cdb29ae43c3a1aad54267a693"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
            "heading": "The same market reports persistent friction",
            "text": "One consequential reported development is sharing processed signals or classification outputs instead of raw datasets. That can preserve data custody while spreading judgments between services. The report gives Checkstep/Sightengine as one example and discusses other collaborative models. These are research-report claims requiring provider agreements, interface specifications and actual downstream decisions before promotion into an exercised cross-platform control claim. No WEF reference was found in the retained report's text search; no exclusive taxonomy lineage is inferred.",
            "matched": [
              "Checkstep"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "986db940dc28ebd124f175b406ee249c15d8ba817a931590769c814e4b65e827"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-sightengine",
      "label": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Terms identify service owned/operated by Kozelo SAS, French SAS; classifiers in coauthored workflow. No corporate-control register investigation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-sightengine",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-sightengine",
        "name": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Terms identify service owned/operated by Kozelo SAS, French SAS; classifiers in coauthored workflow. No corporate-control register investigation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Terms identify service owned/operated by Kozelo SAS, French SAS; classifiers in coauthored workflow. No corporate-control register investigation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sightengine is a content-analysis service owned and operated by Kozelo SAS, a French company identified in its terms. Its classifiers can supply scores to Checkstep, where a customer applies its own moderation policy.",
        "structuralRole": "Classification supplier with distinct ordinary-data and feedback terms",
        "significance": "Sightengine provides an upstream judgement that other software can turn into a platform action. Its contracts also distinguish routine processing from voluntary feedback contributions. That distinction determines which data-use permissions attach to which route, rather than making every scan equivalent to a training submission.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How data moves",
            "text": "The coauthored integration guide describes Sightengine scores entering Checkstep workflows. Ordinary subscriber data uses a processor arrangement. Voluntary Feedback API submissions instead carry a licence for training, testing and development, subject to necessary rights and consents; the data-processing addendum assigns Sightengine a controller role for feedback and a separate retention exception subject to law and policy. The published terms establish permissions, not proof of particular media retention, training or automatic forwarding of routine scans into feedback.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-classifier-workflow",
              "w22-sig-e-feedback-training",
              "w22-sig-e-feedback-controller",
              "w22-sig-e-sightengine-processor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms 9.3 raw-media licence covers voluntary Feedback API submissions for training/testing/development with necessary rights/consents. General-suggestion sentence is distinct; its perpetual/irrevocable adjectives are not imported. Routine scanning or Checkstep forwarding not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-feedback-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may use voluntarily submitted media for model work",
            "sourceName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "targetName": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DPA2.3 assigns controller role for Feedback Data with lawful basis/privacy law;4.4 permits perpetual retention subject to policy/law and exempts automatic return/deletion. Does not erase privacy rights or prove actual retention/training.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-feedback-controller"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "acts as independent controller under feedback exception",
            "sourceName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "targetName": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ordinary subscriber-data uses processor arrangement, requiring controller authority if subscriber itself processor. Correction/deletion assistance and law limits differ from feedback exception. Particular execution unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-sightengine-processor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "instructs ordinary processing under published DPA",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Coauthored guide describes scores entering Checkstep workflow; PUBLIC calls example signal sharing. Not shared offender list, universal no-external-processing guarantee or observed customer deployment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-classifier-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes supplying classification outputs",
            "sourceName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "targetName": "Checkstep",
            "date": "Currentguide observed 9 September 2026; historical version unknown. PUBLICpublished 26 March 2026 citesguideas 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          },
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-customer-workflow",
      "label": "Customer moderation workflow",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Documented integration: scores feed configured policy and decisions for a customer. Capability, not shared cross-platform restriction list or observed deployment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-customer-workflow",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-customer-workflow",
        "name": "Customer moderation workflow",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Documented integration: scores feed configured policy and decisions for a customer. Capability, not shared cross-platform restriction list or observed deployment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Documented integration: scores feed configured policy and decisions for a customer. Capability, not shared cross-platform restriction list or observed deployment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Documented integration: scores feed configured policy and decisions for a customer. Capability, not shared cross-platform restriction list or observed deployment.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Content/reference access and metadata feed selected scanners and policy-linked decisions for customer platform. No shared cross-customer restriction register established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-workflow"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents configurable moderation workflow",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Customer moderation workflow",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Model selection and policy/threshold mapping determine actions/review. No actual customer settings, thresholds or acceptance observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-policy-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "selects policy configuration in described workflow",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Customer moderation workflow",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "label": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Abstract contractual/workflow role, not identified customer. Chooses settings and implements webhook handler; actual accepted terms unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-customer-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "name": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Abstract contractual/workflow role, not identified customer. Chooses settings and implements webhook handler; actual accepted terms unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Abstract contractual/workflow role, not identified customer. Chooses settings and implements webhook handler; actual accepted terms unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the customer platform or subscriber role in the Checkstep and Sightengine workflow, rather than a named company. The customer selects models, configures policy thresholds and connects moderation decisions to its own service.",
        "structuralRole": "Customer authority over settings and downstream enforcement",
        "significance": "Classification alone does not remove content. A customer's thresholds, review rules and event handler connect scanner output to action. Locating this role prevents the technology supplier from absorbing responsibility for choices made by a platform, and identifies where a user's appeal or restoration must become effective.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Configuration and contractual choices",
            "text": "The documentation gives customers policy and model choices and requires implementation of decision-event handlers. Events can cover content removal and restoration, account actions and upheld or overturned incidents. Checkstep's terms provide an email opt-out from customer-data machine-learning use. Ordinary Sightengine subscriber data follows a processor arrangement, requiring proper controller authority. The record describes available mechanisms rather than any identified customer's settings, opt-out election or completed appeal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-policy-choice",
              "w22-sig-e-webhook-decisions",
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-events",
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-optout",
              "w22-sig-e-sightengine-processor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms 14 identify contracting party as controller,Checkstep processor; instructions/protected subprocessors/referred requests. Termination 30 days is backup-request window, not universal deletion deadline. Executed terms unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-controller"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains controller role under published terms",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Checkstep",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ordinary subscriber-data uses processor arrangement, requiring controller authority if subscriber itself processor. Correction/deletion assistance and law limits differ from feedback exception. Particular execution unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-sightengine-processor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "instructs ordinary processing under published DPA",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "decision can remove/restore/keep content down; human author-decision can suspend/terminate/restore accounts, with content removal depending on decision. Customer must implement handler. Capability, not observed enforcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-webhook-decisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can return content and account action instructions",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "incident-closed includes overturned/upheld; restoration and notification events described. No successful appeal, independent adjudication or correction across unrelated platforms established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-appeal-events"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can return appeal and restoration events",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Model selection and policy/threshold mapping determine actions/review. No actual customer settings, thresholds or acceptance observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-policy-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
                "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer moderation workflow",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "selects policy configuration in described workflow",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Customer moderation workflow",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Email opt-out for ML use is published contractual option, not observed customer election or historical integration term.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-optout"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may opt out under published terms",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-checkstep-training",
      "label": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Terms 5.5 permit service ML use with email opt-out. Permission, customer acceptance and actual use remain separate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-checkstep-training",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-checkstep-training",
        "name": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Terms 5.5 permit service ML use with email opt-out. Permission, customer acceptance and actual use remain separate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Terms 5.5 permit service ML use with email opt-out. Permission, customer acceptance and actual use remain separate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Terms 5.5 permit service ML use with email opt-out. Permission, customer acceptance and actual use remain separate.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms 5.5 permit Customer Data for service ML and treat it as customer instruction, subject to email opt-out. No anonymization condition in clause; actual training, pooling, acceptance/opt-out unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Checkstep",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes opt-out customer-data ML permission",
            "sourceName": "Checkstep",
            "targetName": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Email opt-out for ML use is published contractual option, not observed customer election or historical integration term.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-checkstep-optout"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may opt out under published terms",
            "sourceName": "Customer platform / subscriber role",
            "targetName": "Checkstep customer-data training permission",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-feedback",
      "label": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Voluntarily submitted raw media, optionally labelled. Separate from ordinary scanning and general suggestions/corrections; special licence/controller/retention terms.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w22-sig-feedback",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-feedback",
        "name": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Voluntarily submitted raw media, optionally labelled. Separate from ordinary scanning and general suggestions/corrections; special licence/controller/retention terms.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Voluntarily submitted raw media, optionally labelled. Separate from ordinary scanning and general suggestions/corrections; special licence/controller/retention terms."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "signals",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Voluntarily submitted raw media, optionally labelled. Separate from ordinary scanning and general suggestions/corrections; special licence/controller/retention terms.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms 9.3 raw-media licence covers voluntary Feedback API submissions for training/testing/development with necessary rights/consents. General-suggestion sentence is distinct; its perpetual/irrevocable adjectives are not imported. Routine scanning or Checkstep forwarding not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-feedback-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may use voluntarily submitted media for model work",
            "sourceName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "targetName": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DPA2.3 assigns controller role for Feedback Data with lawful basis/privacy law;4.4 permits perpetual retention subject to policy/law and exempts automatic return/deletion. Does not erase privacy rights or prove actual retention/training.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w22-sig-e-feedback-controller"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
                "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "acts as independent controller under feedback exception",
            "sourceName": "Sightengine (Kozelo SAS)",
            "targetName": "Voluntary Sightengine feedback data",
            "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
            "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-terms",
      "label": "Current Cash App US terms",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Current agreement with Block: displayed effective 7 February 2024, updated 26 August 2026. Gray annotations non-operative; no inference these bytes governed the earlier Lantern case.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-terms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-terms",
        "name": "Current Cash App US terms",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Current agreement with Block: displayed effective 7 February 2024, updated 26 August 2026. Gray annotations non-operative; no inference these bytes governed the earlier Lantern case.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current agreement with Block: displayed effective 7 February 2024, updated 26 August 2026. Gray annotations non-operative; no inference these bytes governed the earlier Lantern case."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current agreement with Block: displayed effective 7 February 2024, updated 26 August 2026. Gray annotations non-operative; no inference these bytes governed the earlier Lantern case.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Block is the contracting company. Gray explanatory annotations are expressly non-operative; this is a current text, not proof of the agreement governing a historical account action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes contracting terms",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Current Cash App US terms",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "XXIII.5 incorporates the AUP. Separate criminal-activity, adult-content-sales and elevated-risk restrictions must not be collapsed into one illegal-content rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-incorporates-aup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "incorporates acceptable-use policy",
            "sourceName": "Current Cash App US terms",
            "targetName": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-aup",
      "label": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Incorporated current policy; criminal activity, adult-content sales and risky-business restrictions are distinct. Adoption date and specific external instruction unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-aup",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-aup",
        "name": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Incorporated current policy; criminal activity, adult-content sales and risky-business restrictions are distinct. Adoption date and specific external instruction unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Incorporated current policy; criminal activity, adult-content sales and risky-business restrictions are distinct. Adoption date and specific external instruction unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Incorporated current policy; criminal activity, adult-content sales and risky-business restrictions are distinct. Adoption date and specific external instruction unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AUP includes businesses Block believes risk violating bank/card-network policies. No particular policy, external instruction or closure decision is identified by that generic reference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-external-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Referenced bank/card-network policies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "references bank and card-network policies",
            "sourceName": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
            "targetName": "Referenced bank/card-network policies",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "XXIII.5 incorporates the AUP. Separate criminal-activity, adult-content-sales and elevated-risk restrictions must not be collapsed into one illegal-content rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-incorporates-aup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Current Cash App US terms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "incorporates acceptable-use policy",
            "sourceName": "Current Cash App US terms",
            "targetName": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-external-policies",
      "label": "Referenced bank/card-network policies",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Generic external-rule category referenced by Cash App AUP; no identified policy version, bank instruction, ownership chain or individual closure direction acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy input"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-external-policies",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-external-policies",
        "name": "Referenced bank/card-network policies",
        "role": "Policy input",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Generic external-rule category referenced by Cash App AUP; no identified policy version, bank instruction, ownership chain or individual closure direction acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Generic external-rule category referenced by Cash App AUP; no identified policy version, bank instruction, ownership chain or individual closure direction acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Generic external-rule category referenced by Cash App AUP; no identified policy version, bank instruction, ownership chain or individual closure direction acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy input",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AUP includes businesses Block believes risk violating bank/card-network policies. No particular policy, external instruction or closure decision is identified by that generic reference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-external-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "references bank and card-network policies",
            "sourceName": "Cash App acceptable-use policy",
            "targetName": "Referenced bank/card-network policies",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-help",
      "label": "Cash App closure-help procedure",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Undated provider guidance: contact Support, eligibility screen, then appropriate-team review; up to 10 days, not expressly business days. Not observed performance or complete legal duties.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-help",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-help",
        "name": "Cash App closure-help procedure",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Undated provider guidance: contact Support, eligibility screen, then appropriate-team review; up to 10 days, not expressly business days. Not observed performance or complete legal duties.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Undated provider guidance: contact Support, eligibility screen, then appropriate-team review; up to 10 days, not expressly business days. Not observed performance or complete legal duties."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Undated provider guidance: contact Support, eligibility screen, then appropriate-team review; up to 10 days, not expressly business days. Not observed performance or complete legal duties.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Help directs customers to Support, then an eligibility screen and appropriate team; says up to 10 days, without specifying business days. It describes cash-out/pending-deposit routes but cannot establish unconditional withdrawal, actual performance or an external bank-account closure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-help-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
                "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes Support and eligible-case review route",
            "sourceName": "Cash App",
            "targetName": "Cash App closure-help procedure",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
            "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-customers",
      "label": "Cash App US customer accounts",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "General class under current terms and 2025 order, not the particular 18 accounts in Lantern report. Account access, balance withdrawal and transfer-error remedies are distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-customers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-customers",
        "name": "Cash App US customer accounts",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "General class under current terms and 2025 order, not the particular 18 accounts in Lantern report. Account access, balance withdrawal and transfer-error remedies are distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "General class under current terms and 2025 order, not the particular 18 accounts in Lantern report. Account access, balance withdrawal and transfer-error remedies are distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject represents US Cash App customers whose account access and custodial balances are governed by the service terms and applicable regulatory duties. It is a general affected class, separate from particular accounts mentioned in Lantern reporting.",
        "structuralRole": "People dependent on the platform for access to custodial funds",
        "significance": "The account interface is a practical control point even where balances remain separate from corporate funds. Customers cannot simply bypass Cash App and retrieve these balances directly from its custodial institutions under the cited terms. Restrictions therefore affect access without themselves establishing a transfer of ownership or forfeiture.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access and restriction mechanisms",
            "text": "Terms updated on 26 August 2026 reserve suspension and termination discretion, risk-based transfer delays and investigative holds. Post-termination withdrawal is conditional on other terms and pending liabilities or investigations. Separate clauses address binding legal instruments and government requests. These mechanisms coexist with the CFPB order's notice and remedy obligations. A hold need not be court-ordered, and the terms do not prove that a custodian directed any particular closure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-termination",
              "w23-cash-e-conditional-balance",
              "w23-cash-e-legal-process",
              "w23-cash-e-custody-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current XXIII.9 permits account/access suspension or termination at any time for any reason and reasonable notification steps; AUP II permits suspension/termination without notice for reported violations. These provisions do not erase separate regulatory duties or establish actual use in a particular case.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-termination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              },
              {
                "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reserves suspension and termination discretion",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Cash App US customer accounts",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "VI.1(e)(iii) permits risk-based transfer delays/limits and investigation holds; XXIII.11 makes post-termination withdrawal subject to company discretion and other terms, including pending liabilities/investigation. No universal release deadline, actual forfeiture or confiscation is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-conditional-balance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reserves conditional holds and withdrawal access",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Cash App US customer accounts",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "XXIII.3 covers freeze/withhold/remit responses to specified binding legal instruments; VI.1(e)(iii) separately includes government requests. These coexist with discretionary risk holds; not every hold is court-ordered and no specific government instruction is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-legal-process"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reserves responses to legal process and government requests",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Cash App US customer accounts",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "VI.3 says balances are separate from corporate funds and accessed through Cash App, not directly at custodial banks/brokerages. Limited agency/custody arrangement does not prove Block ownership of funds or that a custodial bank directed a closure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-custody-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
                "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Cash App",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must use Cash App to access custodial balances under terms",
            "sourceName": "Cash App US customer accounts",
            "targetName": "Cash App",
            "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
            "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-cfpb",
      "label": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "US agency issuing and enforcing 2025-CFPB-0001. Order, findings, response and implementation evidence remain separate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-cfpb",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-cfpb",
        "name": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "US agency issuing and enforcing 2025-CFPB-0001. Order, findings, response and implementation evidence remain separate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "US agency issuing and enforcing 2025-CFPB-0001. Order, findings, response and implementation evidence remain separate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is the US agency that issued the January 2025 Block consent order. Its findings address historical Cash App customer-service and account-restriction practices, while the order establishes redress and continuing compliance obligations.",
        "structuralRole": "Public enforcement and compliance-inspection authority",
        "significance": "The Bureau connects consumer complaints and financial-service practices to enforceable remediation. Its access to compliance records gives it an oversight route beyond public company statements. This differs from independently adjudicating every individual account appeal or establishing that a later signal-sharing programme caused the historical failures.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Findings, records and penalty",
            "text": "The order describes inadequate restriction notices, poorly publicised appeals, slow reconsideration and delayed fund release, as agency findings to which Block did not admit. The CFPB may obtain compliance plans and supporting records and require further reporting or testimony. It assessed a $55 million civil penalty; Block's 2024 Form 10-K reports payment in January 2025. The assessment and reported payment describe the same penalty, not two transfers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-cfpb-issued",
              "w23-cash-e-historical-recourse",
              "w23-cash-e-compliance-inspect",
              "w23-cash-e-penalty-paid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Consent-order findings describe absent or generic restriction notices, little-publicized appeals, slow reconsideration and delayed release even after successful appeal. These are attributed historical agency findings, without Block admissions; no identified Lantern case or current failure rate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-historical-recourse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "found inadequate account-restriction recourse",
            "sourceName": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "Findings entered 16 January 2025 concern historical practices described in the order; no common precise interval assigned."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Compliance Plan is furnished on request; original electronic compliance, redress and complaint records must be and produced, with additional reporting/testimony powers. This is not Redress Plan prior non-objection or independent adjudication of every account appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-compliance-inspect"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may obtain plan and compliance records on request",
            "sourceName": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Final administrative order based on agency findings; Block consented without admitting or denying facts or conclusions except jurisdiction. Not a trial admission or a finding about Lantern.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-cfpb-issued"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "entered consent order against Block",
            "sourceName": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "targetName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "date": "Entered 16 January 2025; stipulation signed 15 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Order assessed USD 55 m civil penalty payable to CFPB Civil Penalty Fund within 10 calendar days. Block 2024 Form 10-K reports payment in January 2025. This is one penalty with order and issuer-payment evidence, not two transfers; bank/government receipt not acquired. Financial details: value: 55,000,000; currency: USD; kind: company-reported payment of the same assessed civil penalty; period: January 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-penalty-paid"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was ordered to pay a penalty and reports paying it",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; company reports payment during January 2025, exact day unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
            "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued the January 2025 order requiring Block to change Cash App practices and provide financial remedies. Its case shows public enforcement reaching beyond a company's terms of service into restriction notices, appeals, fraud controls and compliance records.",
          "structuralRole": "Compelling consumer remedies and inspection of financial-service practices",
          "significance": "The CFPB is a clear counterweight to private account control in this investigation. Its Block order turns failures in customer treatment into specified obligations, reporting powers and financial consequences, giving consumers a route beyond the provider's own house rules.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau appears here through its January 2025 enforcement action against Block, the company behind Cash App. The case concerns what happens when a financial provider restricts an account and the customer cannot get a useful explanation or timely review. It shows a public authority intervening in decisions otherwise governed by the company's processes and customer agreement.",
            "The order described inadequate restriction notices, poorly publicized appeals, slow reconsideration and delayed release of funds. It required changes to notice and review procedures, including appeal decisions within ten business days, together with fraud controls and internal oversight. Block consented to the order while disputing the agency's characterization of historical practices. The resulting obligations went beyond a public request that the company improve.",
            "The Bureau also obtained a continuing inspection route. It may request compliance plans and supporting records, as well as further reporting or testimony. It assessed a $55 million civil penalty, which Block's annual filing reports paying in January 2025. These mechanisms join required behavior to information access and financial consequences.",
            "The same order requires protective action against suspected fraud accounts and fairer treatment of customers whose access is restricted. That combination is important to the wider investigation: public authority can demand stronger controls and stronger remedies at the same time. The CFPB case makes the available counterpower visible in concrete procedures rather than leaving it as an abstract promise of accountability."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
              "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
              "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
              "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
            },
            {
              "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
              "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "label": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Final order, with Block consenting without factual/legal admissions except jurisdiction. Imposes anti-fraud controls, restriction remedies, redress and monitoring; conditional duration/modification provisions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
        "name": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Final order, with Block consenting without factual/legal admissions except jurisdiction. Imposes anti-fraud controls, restriction remedies, redress and monitoring; conditional duration/modification provisions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Final order, with Block consenting without factual/legal admissions except jurisdiction. Imposes anti-fraud controls, restriction remedies, redress and monitoring; conditional duration/modification provisions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
            "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The CFPB's 16 January 2025 consent order against Block is a final administrative instrument addressing Cash App fraud controls, account restrictions, error handling and redress. Block consented without admitting or denying the findings apart from jurisdiction.",
        "structuralRole": "Binding combination of fraud controls and customer remedies",
        "significance": "The order links exclusion powers to procedural duties: it requires Block to prevent suspected fraudulent-inducement accounts from operating while also giving restricted customers notice and an appeal route. That combination is important when assessing payment restrictions as both a protective intervention and a potential barrier to funds.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Concrete deadlines and distinct remedies",
            "text": "Paragraph 108(c) requires written restriction and appeal notice within 24 hours unless prohibited by law enforcement. Paragraph 108(d) requires a decision on an appeal or status-change request within ten business days of receipt, including an explanation for denial. Defined transfer-error claims follow a separate investigation and evidence-access procedure, including provisional credit rules. These obligations do not guarantee reinstatement or turn every account-closure appeal into a transfer-error claim. The order does not prescribe Lantern as a supplier.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-cfpb-issued",
              "w23-cash-e-restriction-duty",
              "w23-cash-e-error-duty",
              "w23-cash-e-fraud-controls"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "108(c): written decision/appeal notice within 24 hours, unless prohibited by law enforcement. Frozen-funds carveout applies only to transfer-information limb (c)(iii). 108(d): grant/deny appeal or status-change request within 10 business days of receipt; written decision and denial explanation. No guaranteed restoration or wholesale import of the (c) exception into (d).",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-restriction-duty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required restriction notice and appeal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires restriction notice and appeal procedure",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "targetName": "Required restriction notice and appeal",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "For a defined Notice of Error: reasonable investigation, results within 3 business days after completion, relied-on-document notice/copies for no/different error, correction within 1 business day and provisional credit within 10 business days if incomplete. The express document right does not automatically cover every closure appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-error-duty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required transfer-error investigation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires distinct transfer-error investigation and evidence access",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "targetName": "Required transfer-error investigation",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "108(f) requires identifying suspected fraudulent-inducement accounts, preventing their operation and associated individuals returning, complaint tracking and protective procedures. The same order requires restrictions and remedies; no prescribed Lantern supplier or universal cross-platform exclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-fraud-controls"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires fraud controls including account exclusion",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Final administrative order based on agency findings; Block consented without admitting or denying facts or conclusions except jurisdiction. Not a trial admission or a finding about Lantern.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-cfpb-issued"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "entered consent order against Block",
            "sourceName": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "targetName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "date": "Entered 16 January 2025; stipulation signed 15 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Block public response characterized issues as historical and disputed the CFPB account while claiming service/protection improvements. Provider counter-account does not independently verify remediation or negate the operative consent order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-issuer-disputes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
                "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "disputed characterization and claimed improvements",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "date": "Published 16 January 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
            "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
            "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
      "label": "Required restriction notice and appeal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Order 108(c)–(d):24 h written notice with specified exception and 10 business-day decision on appeal/change status. Not guaranteed restoration or the transfer-error document-access rule.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
        "name": "Required restriction notice and appeal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Order 108(c)–(d):24 h written notice with specified exception and 10 business-day decision on appeal/change status. Not guaranteed restoration or the transfer-error document-access rule.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Order 108(c)–(d):24 h written notice with specified exception and 10 business-day decision on appeal/change status. Not guaranteed restoration or the transfer-error document-access rule."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Order 108(c)–(d):24 h written notice with specified exception and 10 business-day decision on appeal/change status. Not guaranteed restoration or the transfer-error document-access rule.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "108(c): written decision/appeal notice within 24 hours, unless prohibited by law enforcement. Frozen-funds carveout applies only to transfer-information limb (c)(iii). 108(d): grant/deny appeal or status-change request within 10 business days of receipt; written decision and denial explanation. No guaranteed restoration or wholesale import of the (c) exception into (d).",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-restriction-duty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires restriction notice and appeal procedure",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "targetName": "Required restriction notice and appeal",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Order requires published web/in-app appeal instructions, notice and timely decisions by Block. The current help page is not the complete measure of the obligation; whether any particular request complied requires its records and applicable modifications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-restriction-block"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
                "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
              },
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must implement account-restriction safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Required restriction notice and appeal",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
            "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-error-procedure",
      "label": "Required transfer-error investigation",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Defined Notice of Error process includes investigation, provisional credit, findings and evidence access. Not a generic right to all evidence behind every account closure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-error-procedure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-error-procedure",
        "name": "Required transfer-error investigation",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Defined Notice of Error process includes investigation, provisional credit, findings and evidence access. Not a generic right to all evidence behind every account closure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Defined Notice of Error process includes investigation, provisional credit, findings and evidence access. Not a generic right to all evidence behind every account closure."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Defined Notice of Error process includes investigation, provisional credit, findings and evidence access. Not a generic right to all evidence behind every account closure.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "For a defined Notice of Error: reasonable investigation, results within 3 business days after completion, relied-on-document notice/copies for no/different error, correction within 1 business day and provisional credit within 10 business days if incomplete. The express document right does not automatically cover every closure appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-error-duty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires distinct transfer-error investigation and evidence access",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Block consent order — 16 January 2025",
            "targetName": "Required transfer-error investigation",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
      "label": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Create and implement within 120 days; furnish to CFPB on request. Actual plan/implementation not acquired; not the separate prior non-objection Redress Plan.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Required record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-compliance-plan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
        "name": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
        "role": "Required record",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Create and implement within 120 days; furnish to CFPB on request. Actual plan/implementation not acquired; not the separate prior non-objection Redress Plan.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Create and implement within 120 days; furnish to CFPB on request. Actual plan/implementation not acquired; not the separate prior non-objection Redress Plan."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Create and implement within 120 days; furnish to CFPB on request. Actual plan/implementation not acquired; not the separate prior non-objection Redress Plan.",
        "structuralRole": "Required record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Compliance Plan is furnished on request; original electronic compliance, redress and complaint records must be and produced, with additional reporting/testimony powers. This is not Redress Plan prior non-objection or independent adjudication of every account appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-compliance-inspect"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may obtain plan and compliance records on request",
            "sourceName": "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Board/executives must review relevant plans and submissions and ensure necessary actions/resources; annual sworn Compliance Report must be Board approved. Does not prove the required reports were prepared or accepted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-board-cfpb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has ultimate compliance responsibility",
            "sourceName": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Compliance Plan must set detailed steps, deadlines and Board apprisal. Its 120-day create/implement clock is not an express blanket grace period for every 108 duty. No plan or implementation record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-compliance-create"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must create and implement within 120 days",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
      "label": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Director review/non-objection;75 million reserve obligation and 120 million consumer-redress cap. Distribution report not obtained; no actual consumer total established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Required record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-redress-plan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
        "name": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
        "role": "Required record",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Director review/non-objection;75 million reserve obligation and 120 million consumer-redress cap. Distribution report not obtained; no actual consumer total established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Director review/non-objection;75 million reserve obligation and 120 million consumer-redress cap. Distribution report not obtained; no actual consumer total established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Director review/non-objection;75 million reserve obligation and 120 million consumer-redress cap. Distribution report not obtained; no actual consumer total established.",
        "structuralRole": "Required record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "117 requires USD 75 m reserved or in segregated deposit within 10 calendar days; consumer redress capped at USD 120 m. If consumer redress is below USD 75 m, specified shortfall goes to CFPB, with possible further redress/Treasury residue. Neither figure proves cash received by consumers or actual reserve establishment. Financial details: value: 75,000,000; currency: USD; kind: ordered reserve or segregated-deposit obligation; not observed payment; period: Within 10 calendar days of order effective date",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-redress-reserve"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must reserve funds for ordered redress",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Block submits Redress Plan within 120 days; Director/delegate may require revision; Block must revise and resubmit within 15 days of that direction. Block must follow non-objected-to plan, with credit payment/non-credit commencement clock after non-objection and a post-completion report. Actual non-objection and completed distribution report not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-redress-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CFPB Enforcement Director role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reviews for non-objection and may require revision",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Enforcement Director role",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Payments under docket 2025-CFPB-0001 satisfy state redress; July terms do not create a second independent consumer pool. Federal reserve/shortfall mechanics remain separate from proof of consumer receipt.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credits payments under federal redress order",
            "sourceName": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-cfpb-enforcement",
      "label": "CFPB Enforcement Director role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Order-defined Director/delegate with redress non-objection/revision and specified monitoring/modification duties; not an identified individual adjudicating every appeal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-cfpb-enforcement",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-cfpb-enforcement",
        "name": "CFPB Enforcement Director role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Order-defined Director/delegate with redress non-objection/revision and specified monitoring/modification duties; not an identified individual adjudicating every appeal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Order-defined Director/delegate with redress non-objection/revision and specified monitoring/modification duties; not an identified individual adjudicating every appeal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Order-defined Director/delegate with redress non-objection/revision and specified monitoring/modification duties; not an identified individual adjudicating every appeal.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Block submits Redress Plan within 120 days; Director/delegate may require revision; Block must revise and resubmit within 15 days of that direction. Block must follow non-objected-to plan, with credit payment/non-credit commencement clock after non-objection and a post-completion report. Actual non-objection and completed distribution report not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-redress-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reviews for non-objection and may require revision",
            "sourceName": "CFPB Enforcement Director role",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-block-board",
      "label": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Board has ultimate responsibility under both orders; specified review/approval/reporting duties. No inference particular directors exercised every required action.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governing body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-block-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-block-board",
        "name": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
        "role": "Governing body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Board has ultimate responsibility under both orders; specified review/approval/reporting duties. No inference particular directors exercised every required action.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Board has ultimate responsibility under both orders; specified review/approval/reporting duties. No inference particular directors exercised every required action."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Board has ultimate responsibility under both orders; specified review/approval/reporting duties. No inference particular directors exercised every required action.",
        "structuralRole": "Governing body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Board or authorized committee has formal CAP approval and ultimate compliance responsibility. CAP is submitted to state Executive Committee; receipt is not an express additional CAP approval requirement. Actual plan and approval not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must formally approve corrective action plan",
            "sourceName": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "targetName": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Board/executives must review relevant plans and submissions and ensure necessary actions/resources; annual sworn Compliance Report must be Board approved. Does not prove the required reports were prepared or accepted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-board-cfpb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has ultimate compliance responsibility",
            "sourceName": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Compliance Plan",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Agreed corporate committee reports to Board quarterly. Annual compliance report has separate committee approval/on-request availability; no report, actual meeting or blanket prior AG approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-board-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July required company compliance committee/report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must provide quarterly compliance reporting",
            "sourceName": "July required company compliance committee/report",
            "targetName": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-working-groups",
      "label": "Required Cash App risk/support working groups",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "CFPB109 committee includes risk, compliance, business, customer-operations, data-science roles; customer-support, fraud/security, EFTA groups. Actual meeting/resource records not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Mandated committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-working-groups",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-working-groups",
        "name": "Required Cash App risk/support working groups",
        "role": "Mandated committee",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "CFPB109 committee includes risk, compliance, business, customer-operations, data-science roles; customer-support, fraud/security, EFTA groups. Actual meeting/resource records not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CFPB109 committee includes risk, compliance, business, customer-operations, data-science roles; customer-support, fraud/security, EFTA groups. Actual meeting/resource records not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CFPB109 committee includes risk, compliance, business, customer-operations, data-science roles; customer-support, fraud/security, EFTA groups. Actual meeting/resource records not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Mandated committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "109 specifies a senior committee and support, fraud/security and EFTA groups with assessment, escalation and resources duties. Required structure, not evidence of actual appointments, meetings or vendor control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-working-groups"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must maintain specified internal oversight roles",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Required Cash App risk/support working groups",
            "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
      "label": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Authorities in multistate order. Maine Appendix A lists 49 jurisdictions includingDC;48 Appendix B allocations. Not the eight examination states, seven enforcement leads or five-member executive committee.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Collective role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-state-regulators",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
        "name": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
        "role": "Collective role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Authorities in multistate order. Maine Appendix A lists 49 jurisdictions includingDC;48 Appendix B allocations. Not the eight examination states, seven enforcement leads or five-member executive committee.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authorities in multistate order. Maine Appendix A lists 49 jurisdictions includingDC;48 Appendix B allocations. Not the eight examination states, seven enforcement leads or five-member executive committee."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
          },
          {
            "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Authorities in multistate order. Maine Appendix A lists 49 jurisdictions includingDC;48 Appendix B allocations. Not the eight examination states, seven enforcement leads or five-member executive committee.",
        "structuralRole": "Collective role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD 80 m settlement comprises USD 79.075 m penalty and USD 925,000 state administrative costs, payable 20 calendar days after payment instructions. Block later expected payment by/about February 2025; no receipt acquired. Costs are neither consultant fees nor consumer redress. Covered-conduct release is conditioned on full payment. Financial details: value: 80,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement obligation; no payment receipt established; period: 20 calendar days after receipt of payment instructions",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-obligation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owes separate penalty and administrative costs",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public order refers to AML findings in an not obtained November 2023 examination report. Block neither admits nor denies violations; general release/press-summary categories are not a proved catalogue of specific failures. Maine copy has signature/party/allocation differences as unresolved metadata.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-issued"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
                "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              },
              {
                "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
                "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Multistate Block BSA/AML order — January 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "entered multistate consent instrument with Block",
            "sourceName": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "targetName": "Multistate Block BSA/AML order — January 2025",
            "date": "Effective 15 January 2025; Colorado signature in fuller copy dated 16 January 2025. No common signing day asserted."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Initial committee comprises Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington representatives. It is not the eight examining states, seven enforcement leads or every participating regulator; representation may be replaced under the order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-committee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "State order Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "act through specified Executive Committee",
            "sourceName": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "targetName": "State order Executive Committee",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
          },
          {
            "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
            "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-state-order",
      "label": "Multistate Block BSA/AML order — January 2025",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Effective 15 January 2025, fuller Maine copy includes counterparts/appendices. Underlying ROE not attached; no admission of violations, implemented controls or payment receipt inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-state-order",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-state-order",
        "name": "Multistate Block BSA/AML order — January 2025",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Effective 15 January 2025, fuller Maine copy includes counterparts/appendices. Underlying ROE not attached; no admission of violations, implemented controls or payment receipt inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Effective 15 January 2025, fuller Maine copy includes counterparts/appendices. Underlying ROE not attached; no admission of violations, implemented controls or payment receipt inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
          },
          {
            "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Effective 15 January 2025, fuller Maine copy includes counterparts/appendices. Underlying ROE not attached; no admission of violations, implemented controls or payment receipt inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public order refers to AML findings in an not obtained November 2023 examination report. Block neither admits nor denies violations; general release/press-summary categories are not a proved catalogue of specific failures. Maine copy has signature/party/allocation differences as unresolved metadata.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-issued"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
                "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
              },
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              },
              {
                "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
                "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "entered multistate consent instrument with Block",
            "sourceName": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "targetName": "Multistate Block BSA/AML order — January 2025",
            "date": "Effective 15 January 2025; Colorado signature in fuller copy dated 16 January 2025. No common signing day asserted."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
          },
          {
            "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-state-exec",
      "label": "State order Executive Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Initial Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington representatives; receives reports, questions consultant and accesses workpapers. Not express approver of every CAP or replacement consultant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-state-exec",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-state-exec",
        "name": "State order Executive Committee",
        "role": "Committee",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Initial Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington representatives; receives reports, questions consultant and accesses workpapers. Not express approver of every CAP or replacement consultant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Initial Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington representatives; receives reports, questions consultant and accesses workpapers. Not express approver of every CAP or replacement consultant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Initial Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington representatives; receives reports, questions consultant and accesses workpapers. Not express approver of every CAP or replacement consultant.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reports go contemporaneously to Block and committee; committee may request workpapers/work product and ask specified questions. It also receives CAP/company reporting and can request Board Reports. Receipt/inspection rights do not establish state appointment of consultant or formal CAP approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-report-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "receives reports and may inspect workpapers",
            "sourceName": "State order Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Initial committee comprises Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington representatives. It is not the eight examining states, seven enforcement leads or every participating regulator; representation may be replaced under the order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-committee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "act through specified Executive Committee",
            "sourceName": "Participating state money-transmission regulators",
            "targetName": "State order Executive Committee",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "II.D.9 allows reporting extensions on reasonable-ground request/good cause. CAP-duration extension instead has consultant review/documentation under II.D.2(c). No actual extension or unconditional state veto over every plan established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-extensions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may extend reporting deadlines on good cause",
            "sourceName": "State order Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-company-committee",
      "label": "Block Compliance Management Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Company-appointed committee under state order, broad relevant-division representation; reporting/quarterly meetings. Existence of mandate does not prove actual meetings or dissolution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Mandated committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-company-committee",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-company-committee",
        "name": "Block Compliance Management Committee",
        "role": "Mandated committee",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Company-appointed committee under state order, broad relevant-division representation; reporting/quarterly meetings. Existence of mandate does not prove actual meetings or dissolution.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company-appointed committee under state order, broad relevant-division representation; reporting/quarterly meetings. Existence of mandate does not prove actual meetings or dissolution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Company-appointed committee under state order, broad relevant-division representation; reporting/quarterly meetings. Existence of mandate does not prove actual meetings or dissolution.",
        "structuralRole": "Mandated committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Relevant-division representatives must meet quarterly and keep minutes. Committee continues until the later of state Executive Committee receipt of validation report or eight quarters, then Block may dissolve it. No actual meeting/dissolution established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-company-committee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must appoint company compliance committee",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Block Compliance Management Committee",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-consultant",
      "label": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Unidentified qualified independent third-party role: assessment, priority, validation, workpapers. No particular firm appointed or contracted is established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Mandated role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-consultant",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-consultant",
        "name": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
        "role": "Mandated role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Unidentified qualified independent third-party role: assessment, priority, validation, workpapers. No particular firm appointed or contracted is established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unidentified qualified independent third-party role: assessment, priority, validation, workpapers. No particular firm appointed or contracted is established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the qualified independent anti-money-laundering consultant role required by the multistate Block consent order. The retained record establishes assessment, prioritisation and validation duties but does not identify an appointed firm or engagement fee.",
        "structuralRole": "Independent technical review within state-supervised remediation",
        "significance": "The consultant connects regulatory requirements to a corrective-action plan and a test of completion. Access to staff, vendors and records gives the role investigative reach inside the company; contemporaneous reporting and workpaper access allow the state committee to examine its work. Those rights do not confer individual account-closure powers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mandated workflow",
            "text": "The order requires an assessment within nine months, followed by a corrective-action plan within 90 calendar days after assessment and immediate implementation. The consultant validates completion and supplies reports to Block and the state Executive Committee. For replacement, Block must notify the committee within ten calendar days after selection and engage the replacement within thirty days of that notification. The document does not impose a ten-day selection deadline or identify an express state veto over a named consultant.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-assess",
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-access",
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-replacement",
              "w23-cash-e-state-report-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "II.D.8: company Compliance Management Committee must notify state Executive Committee within 10 calendar days after becoming aware of replacement need. Block must notify that committee within 10 calendar days AFTER making its selection, then engage the replacement within 30 calendar days of selection notification. No 10-day selection deadline is stated. Replacement must be qualified, independent and unaffiliated; no named firm, initial appointment method or express state veto established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-replacement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "selects replacement subject to independence and notice",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mandated independent consultant assesses AML adequacy, prioritizes measures for CAP and validates completion. Assessment within nine months; CAP submitted within 90 calendar days after assessment with immediate implementation. Completion/extension provisions do not prove an actual deadline expired. No individual account-closure authority inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-assess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must assess, prioritize and validate corrections",
            "sourceName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "targetName": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reports go contemporaneously to Block and committee; committee may request workpapers/work product and ask specified questions. It also receives CAP/company reporting and can request Board Reports. Receipt/inspection rights do not establish state appointment of consultant or formal CAP approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-report-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "State order Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "receives reports and may inspect workpapers",
            "sourceName": "State order Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Company must make relevant personnel, vendors, facilities and records accessible for the required assessment. Role and required access are established; firm identity, engagement price and actual inspections are unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must provide personnel, vendor and record access",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-state-cap",
      "label": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Board-approved plan after consultant identifies needed corrections; priorities incorporated, state committee receives. Actual CAP, acceptance, extension or validation not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Required record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w23-cash-state-cap",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-state-cap",
        "name": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
        "role": "Required record",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Board-approved plan after consultant identifies needed corrections; priorities incorporated, state committee receives. Actual CAP, acceptance, extension or validation not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Board-approved plan after consultant identifies needed corrections; priorities incorporated, state committee receives. Actual CAP, acceptance, extension or validation not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "cashapp-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Board-approved plan after consultant identifies needed corrections; priorities incorporated, state committee receives. Actual CAP, acceptance, extension or validation not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Required record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mandated independent consultant assesses AML adequacy, prioritizes measures for CAP and validates completion. Assessment within nine months; CAP submitted within 90 calendar days after assessment with immediate implementation. Completion/extension provisions do not prove an actual deadline expired. No individual account-closure authority inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-consultant-assess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must assess, prioritize and validate corrections",
            "sourceName": "Mandated independent AML consultant",
            "targetName": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Board or authorized committee has formal CAP approval and ultimate compliance responsibility. CAP is submitted to state Executive Committee; receipt is not an express additional CAP approval requirement. Actual plan and approval not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must formally approve corrective action plan",
            "sourceName": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "targetName": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "II.D.9 allows reporting extensions on reasonable-ground request/good cause. CAP-duration extension instead has consultant review/documentation under II.D.2(c). No actual extension or unconditional state veto over every plan established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w23-cash-e-state-extensions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
                "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "State order Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may extend reporting deadlines on good cause",
            "sourceName": "State order Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "Required AML Corrective Action Plan",
            "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
            "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "label": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Published state-specific texts: Oregon party signatures observed; California expressly proposed; court entry unverified. Stipulated effective 8 July 2026. State pool is USD 45m, with NAAG allocation inside it; no payment receipt.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Agreed instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "name": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
        "role": "Agreed instrument",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published state-specific texts: Oregon party signatures observed; California expressly proposed; court entry unverified. Stipulated effective 8 July 2026. State pool is USD 45m, with NAAG allocation inside it; no payment receipt.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published state-specific texts: Oregon party signatures observed; California expressly proposed; court entry unverified. Stipulated effective 8 July 2026. State pool is USD 45m, with NAAG allocation inside it; no payment receipt."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
            "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The July 2026 Block resolution is a multistate agreement announced by 46 attorneys general, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Published state documents describe payment, customer-service, account-restriction and redress terms; court entry was not verified in the retained copies.",
        "structuralRole": "Coordinated state settlement terms linked to existing federal redress",
        "significance": "The resolution combines financial consequences with operational service requirements and explicitly reuses the CFPB redress mechanism. That linkage prevents double-counting the same consumer compensation. It also creates a specific reimbursement entitlement for NAAG within the state pool, showing how investigative costs can return to an institution supporting multistate work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Amounts, obligations and document status",
            "text": "The agreement sets a $45 million state pool, including NAAG's allocation, payable within thirty days. Oregon shows party signatures but a blank court approval line; California's copy is labelled proposed. The stipulated effective date is 8 July 2026. Terms require extensive human phone and chat coverage, rather than round-the-clock human telephone support. Existing CFPB redress satisfies the $75–120 million redress obligation; if $75 million has not been paid by 16 January 2030, a fallback plan is due by 18 March 2030.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
                "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-announced",
              "w24-ag-e-july-assent",
              "w24-ag-e-july-service",
              "w24-ag-e-july-redress"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
              "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notice-of-Error evidence rights and credit timing have their own trigger, including no required contact with the P2P recipient/law enforcement before investigation. Fraud controls also identify suspected scam accounts and prevent operation/return. Neither universal closure-document access nor a prescribed Lantern supplier follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-errors-fraud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets distinct transfer-error and anti-fraud duties",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Literal deadline By June 30, 2026 precedes stipulated effective date. Prompt notice, access information, review and reasonable restoration efforts have appropriateness/legal-prohibition qualifications. Flexible language does not say it replaces CFPB 24h notice/10-business-day appeal rules; breach or intent not inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-restriction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets agreed restriction-review procedures",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Existing CFPB redress satisfies the agreed USD 75–120m redress obligation; no second additive award. If at least USD 75m has not been paid in connection with that order by 16 January 2030, materially similar fallback plan must be proposed by 18 March 2030. March deadline is plan submission, not completed payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-redress"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets credit and conditional fallback mechanism",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Block legal officer signs 6 July and Oregon counsel 8 July; court approval line blank. Agreed state pool is USD 45m payable within 30 days, including NAAG allocation. No observed judicial entry, state receipt or additional second consumer-award total.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-assent"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed Oregon party assent to agreed terms",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "date": "Block signature 6 July 2026; Oregon signature 8 July; stipulated effective 8 July; entry unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Live customer support 24h; human phone at least 13.5h including 5–6:30pm Pacific, human chat at least 18h, reasonable waits/callbacks and direct AG complaint contact. Not 24h human telephone service or proof service was delivered.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-service"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets agreed support and escalation duties",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "8 July official announcement identifies 46 AGs, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Published California proposed and Oregon signed-party texts contain substantive terms; neither copy verifies court entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-announced"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
                "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced agreed multistate resolution",
            "sourceName": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
            "targetName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "date": "Announcement 8 July 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
            "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
            "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-july-ags",
      "label": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Announced coalition co-led by Oregon and Texas. Separate state instruments incorporate substantive terms, not one document bearing all 46 signatures. Distinct from January 2025 money-transmission regulators.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Collective role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-july-ags",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-july-ags",
        "name": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
        "role": "Collective role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Announced coalition co-led by Oregon and Texas. Separate state instruments incorporate substantive terms, not one document bearing all 46 signatures. Distinct from January 2025 money-transmission regulators.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Announced coalition co-led by Oregon and Texas. Separate state instruments incorporate substantive terms, not one document bearing all 46 signatures. Distinct from January 2025 money-transmission regulators."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
            "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Announced coalition co-led by Oregon and Texas. Separate state instruments incorporate substantive terms, not one document bearing all 46 signatures. Distinct from January 2025 money-transmission regulators.",
        "structuralRole": "Collective role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Where the State determines material failure and, in its sole discretion, no health/safety/welfare threat, it will notify before legal action. Block has 15 business days for a good-faith written response, potentially describing ongoing correction/timetable; not necessarily a completed cure. Only enumerated duties sunset at five years, direct education at seven; not whole-judgment expiry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed a conditional notice and response process",
            "sourceName": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
            "targetName": "Block",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "8 July official announcement identifies 46 AGs, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Published California proposed and Oregon signed-party texts contain substantive terms; neither copy verifies court entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-announced"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
                "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced agreed multistate resolution",
            "sourceName": "46 participating July Block-settlement AGs",
            "targetName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "date": "Announcement 8 July 2026."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
            "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-july-exec",
      "label": "July settlement Multistate AG Executive Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Vermont and Washington. Specific fallback-plan approval/reporting rights; internal vote rule unknown. Distinct from NAAG and January state-order committees.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-july-exec",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-july-exec",
        "name": "July settlement Multistate AG Executive Committee",
        "role": "Committee",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Vermont and Washington. Specific fallback-plan approval/reporting rights; internal vote rule unknown. Distinct from NAAG and January state-order committees.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Vermont and Washington. Specific fallback-plan approval/reporting rights; internal vote rule unknown. Distinct from NAAG and January state-order committees."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Vermont and Washington. Specific fallback-plan approval/reporting rights; internal vote rule unknown. Distinct from NAAG and January state-order committees.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Defined eight-state committee reviews/approves materially similar fallback plan if condition triggers. Ongoing but incomplete federal payment requires an update; Block notifies committee within 10 days after sending CFPB its paragraph122 Redress Report. No internal vote rule or universal operating-policy veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fallback-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must approve conditional fallback plan before payment",
            "sourceName": "July settlement Multistate AG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-july-redress",
      "label": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Federal-order redress payments satisfy this agreement. Conditional fallback plan is proposed by 18 March 2030 for eight-state committee approval before payment; not a second additive USD 75–120m award.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Conditional plan"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-july-redress",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-july-redress",
        "name": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
        "role": "Conditional plan",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Federal-order redress payments satisfy this agreement. Conditional fallback plan is proposed by 18 March 2030 for eight-state committee approval before payment; not a second additive USD 75–120m award.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Federal-order redress payments satisfy this agreement. Conditional fallback plan is proposed by 18 March 2030 for eight-state committee approval before payment; not a second additive USD 75–120m award."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Federal-order redress payments satisfy this agreement. Conditional fallback plan is proposed by 18 March 2030 for eight-state committee approval before payment; not a second additive USD 75–120m award.",
        "structuralRole": "Conditional plan",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Existing CFPB redress satisfies the agreed USD 75–120m redress obligation; no second additive award. If at least USD 75m has not been paid in connection with that order by 16 January 2030, materially similar fallback plan must be proposed by 18 March 2030. March deadline is plan submission, not completed payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-redress"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets credit and conditional fallback mechanism",
            "sourceName": "July 2026 Block / state-AG agreed resolution",
            "targetName": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Defined eight-state committee reviews/approves materially similar fallback plan if condition triggers. Ongoing but incomplete federal payment requires an update; Block notifies committee within 10 days after sending CFPB its paragraph122 Redress Report. No internal vote rule or universal operating-policy veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fallback-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "July settlement Multistate AG Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must approve conditional fallback plan before payment",
            "sourceName": "July settlement Multistate AG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Payments under docket 2025-CFPB-0001 satisfy state redress; July terms do not create a second independent consumer pool. Federal reserve/shortfall mechanics remain separate from proof of consumer receipt.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "credits payments under federal redress order",
            "sourceName": "July agreed redress credit and 2030 fallback",
            "targetName": "Required CFPB Redress Plan and allocation",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          },
          {
            "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-july-compliance",
      "label": "July required company compliance committee/report",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Agreed committee with quarterly Board reporting; annual report is committee-approved and available to state on request. No observed appointments, reports or monitor implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Mandated role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-july-compliance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-july-compliance",
        "name": "July required company compliance committee/report",
        "role": "Mandated role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Agreed committee with quarterly Board reporting; annual report is committee-approved and available to state on request. No observed appointments, reports or monitor implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Agreed committee with quarterly Board reporting; annual report is committee-approved and available to state on request. No observed appointments, reports or monitor implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Agreed committee with quarterly Board reporting; annual report is committee-approved and available to state on request. No observed appointments, reports or monitor implementation.",
        "structuralRole": "Mandated role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Qualified committee, documented compliance management, training and quarterly Board reporting. Annual compliance report must be prepared and committee-approved, available to state on request. Not CFPB annual sworn Board-approved submission or an observed outside monitor. Existing adequate procedures may satisfy terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-corporate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed to maintain internal compliance oversight",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "July required company compliance committee/report",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Agreed corporate committee reports to Board quarterly. Annual compliance report has separate committee approval/on-request availability; no report, actual meeting or blanket prior AG approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-july-board-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must provide quarterly compliance reporting",
            "sourceName": "July required company compliance committee/report",
            "targetName": "Block Board compliance responsibility",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "National Association of Attorneys General",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Member resource/coordination association and specified July investigation-expense reimbursement payee. No receipt or allocation to another fund/campaign established. Distinct from Mission Foundation and state enforcement committees.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-naag",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-naag",
        "name": "National Association of Attorneys General",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Member resource/coordination association and specified July investigation-expense reimbursement payee. No receipt or allocation to another fund/campaign established. Distinct from Mission Foundation and state enforcement committees.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Member resource/coordination association and specified July investigation-expense reimbursement payee. No receipt or allocation to another fund/campaign established. Distinct from Mission Foundation and state enforcement committees."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GAO-26-107956",
            "url": "https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-26-107956/index.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The National Association of Attorneys General is a member association that supports attorneys-general offices through training, research, coordination and enforcement resources. It also administers specified settlement-derived funds and has an agreed investigative-cost reimbursement allocation in the July 2026 Block resolution.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional support and resource coordination for state enforcement",
        "significance": "NAAG connects otherwise separate jurisdictions through expertise, shared initiatives and purpose-limited resources. Its letterhead and distribution process support coordinated public pressure; reimbursement and fund rules support investigative capacity. Those mechanisms make its institutional role substantial while leaving legal authority with the participating public offices.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Resources and a specific reimbursement",
            "text": "NAAG's FAQ identifies member-service fees, registration receipts and settlement-origin investment proceeds as operating sources. Oregon's July 2026 Block text allocates $264,153.73 to NAAG for participating states' investigative costs, inside the same $45 million state pool; receipt was not established. The separate Mission Foundation's 2024 return reports $5,192,939 of other support and $0 monetary support to NAAG. Other support is not a cash transfer or the association's entire budget. A thirteen-AG Executive Committee governs the association.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-resource-policy",
              "w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement",
              "w24-ag-e-foundation-support",
              "w24-ag-e-naag-governance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oregon48 allocates USD 264,153.73 from the same USD 45m state pool to NAAG for participating states investigation costs/expenses, by wire using Oregon instructions. Agreed entitlement, not observed payment, a separate fine, named judgment creditor or proof of allocation to any fund or letter campaign. Financial details: value: 264,153.73; currency: USD; kind: agreed reimbursement allocation inside USD 45m pool; not additional or paid; period: July 2026 agreement; stated payment within 30 days",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Block",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "agreed investigation-expense reimbursement allocation",
            "sourceName": "Block",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "At 36 signatory states NAAG letterhead, coordinated releases and electronic transmission; below threshold, states receive signed letter with sponsor seals and disseminate themselves. Distribution threshold, not legislative/court authority or proof of historical votes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-letterhead-threshold"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets 36-state threshold for association distribution",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "Version May 2026; exact effective day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "May 2026 process requires at least two Democratic/two Republican sponsors, a draft and colleague letter, named contacts and deadline at least 10 business days ahead. Any edit requires new circulation and voids prior signatures. Not proof of August 2025 drafting steps.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-policy-procedure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes sponsorship and circulation requirements",
            "sourceName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "targetName": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "date": "Version May 2026; exact adoption day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Original visibly bears NAAG letterhead and 2025 officers/staff. That establishes institutional presentation; actual drafting, funding, dispatch and jurisdiction sign-off record remain not obtained. May 2026 procedure is not backdated as proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-letterhead"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appears as letterhead and coordinating identity",
            "sourceName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current description gives 13-AG Executive Committee organizational governance, distinct finance/audit oversight and executive staffing. Does not give NAAG command over every state investigation or imply current people approved past grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-governance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "governs funds, property and management per current page",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current seven-person committee has consumer-protection/charity enforcement and training remit. Page does not supply approval threshold, Cash App allocation or amendment mapping the older three-/five-AG special committees to it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-consolidated-remit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Current consolidated consumer/charity fund committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes separate fund-oversight committee",
            "sourceName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "targetName": "Current consolidated consumer/charity fund committee",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "MOU authorizes 1.0% of total fund value at NAAG fiscal-year close. Current balance, fee application and payment not obtained; unlike VW, no dissolution-to-General-Fund clause is imported.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-fee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes annual administration fee at fiscal close",
            "sourceName": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2016 rules authorize 1.0% of total fund value at inception and annually, covering administration/third-party costs. Rate authorization, not a calculated current fee or observed payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-fee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes inception and annual administration fee",
            "sourceName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution",
            "heading": "Where money goes, and what must not be double-counted",
            "text": "Oregon ¶48 expressly allocates USD 264,153.73 out of the same USD 45 million to the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG), as reimbursement for certain costs and expenses of the participating states' investigation. It directs wire payment using Oregon AG instructions. This is a specific institutional reimbursement entitlement in the signed settlement text. It is neither a separate additional fine nor evidence that NAAG controlled the legal findings, and no bank/recipient payment record was read.",
            "matched": [
              "National Association of Attorneys General"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "acb11f00c33770b538e3f6e0b1b6e06fdc2d059c02fa38f1f3f2f3903b261001"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return",
            "heading": "Identity and accounting boundary",
            "text": "An IRS-hosted original 2024 return separately identifies National Association of Attorneys General Mission Foundation Inc, EIN 30-0088843. PDF1 states a calendar 2024 period, 501(c)(3) status and education/research/training purpose benefiting NAAG members. Its return signature date is 14 November 2025, not an independently established public-release date. Schedule A, PDF16, identifies a Type I supporting organization, sole supported organization NAAG, EIN 52-1322260, with monetary support of $0 and other support of $5,192,939. These are the Foundation's reported support categories; other support is not a cash payment and neither figure is an association-wide budget. Schedule R, PDF44, also lists NAAG as a related exempt organization. The form's tax categories should not be repurposed as a complete operational-control map.",
            "matched": [
              "National Association of Attorneys General"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4d65075504fcad411bed5be9333687b13a9ba2229fbcd347a28ebd595afc1e42"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GAO-26-107956",
            "url": "https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-26-107956/index.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
            "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
            "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "label": "NAAG Executive Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current page describes 13 AGs governing funds/property/management and employing executive director; dated older fund instruments assign additional specified approval rights. No universal authority over state cases.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governing body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
        "name": "NAAG Executive Committee",
        "role": "Governing body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Current page describes 13 AGs governing funds/property/management and employing executive director; dated older fund instruments assign additional specified approval rights. No universal authority over state cases.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current page describes 13 AGs governing funds/property/management and employing executive director; dated older fund instruments assign additional specified approval rights. No universal authority over state cases."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "NAAG's Executive Committee is described on the association's current leadership page as a thirteen-attorney-general body responsible for organisational funds, property and management. It also employs the executive director.",
        "structuralRole": "Association governance and specified fund-appointment authority",
        "significance": "The committee governs a shared institution that supports public enforcement offices. Older fund instruments add particular appointment and conditional dissolution powers, but grant decisions can belong to separate committees. That distinction is necessary to identify which body authorises resources without assigning NAAG command over state cases.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Different powers in different documents",
            "text": "The 2016 VW fund rules give the Executive Committee appointment approval while reserving grants to a special committee. If that committee finds the fund's purpose no longer exists, the Executive Committee may dissolve it and direct remaining money to NAAG's General Fund. The 2012 financial-services fund separately provides appointment approval. The current leadership page does not establish which present members approved historical grants or supply a complete amendment trail for consolidated committees.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-governance",
              "w24-ag-e-naag-director",
              "w24-ag-e-vw-appointment-approval",
              "w24-ag-e-vw-dissolution",
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-appointment-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current description gives 13-AG Executive Committee organizational governance, distinct finance/audit oversight and executive staffing. Does not give NAAG command over every state investigation or imply current people approved past grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-governance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "governs funds, property and management per current page",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "If special committee determines purpose no longer exists, Executive Committee may dissolve and direct remaining funds to NAAG General Fund. Conditional authority, not observed transfer; not transplanted to FSF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-dissolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may dissolve upon specified purpose determination",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2016 rules give Executive Committee appointment approval. This is separate from the special committee grant votes; present consolidated-committee authority is not inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-appointment-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2012 appointment approval is distinct from the special committee grant-decision thresholds. Current consolidation or delegation amendment not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-appointment-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published committee remit assigns employment and day-to-day management role. Specific appointment terms and historical incumbents not reconstructed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-director"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG executive director role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "employs executive director for daily operations",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "NAAG executive director role",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
            "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-naag-president",
      "label": "NAAG president role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Role appoints historical fund special committees subject to executive approval. No inference current incumbent made earlier decisions or named individual voted a grant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-naag-president",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-naag-president",
        "name": "NAAG president role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Role appoints historical fund special committees subject to executive approval. No inference current incumbent made earlier decisions or named individual voted a grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Role appoints historical fund special committees subject to executive approval. No inference current incumbent made earlier decisions or named individual voted a grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Role appoints historical fund special committees subject to executive approval. No inference current incumbent made earlier decisions or named individual voted a grant.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2012 MOU: one-year terms, no more than three same-party members, Executive Committee approval. Applicant-office committee member requires temporary replacement. No present appointment or recusal implementation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-appoint"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appoints five-AG committee subject to approval",
            "sourceName": "NAAG president role",
            "targetName": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2016 rules require appointments from NAAG Executive Committee, with at most two members of one party. Applicant member office triggers temporary replacement under section E. No named vote or actual recusal record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-appoint"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appoints three-AG committee subject to approval",
            "sourceName": "NAAG president role",
            "targetName": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-naag-director",
      "label": "NAAG executive director role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Employed for day-to-day operations; specified historical fund applications on NAAG behalf may be signed by this role. No identity inferred from current roster for earlier events.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-naag-director",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-naag-director",
        "name": "NAAG executive director role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Employed for day-to-day operations; specified historical fund applications on NAAG behalf may be signed by this role. No identity inferred from current roster for earlier events.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Employed for day-to-day operations; specified historical fund applications on NAAG behalf may be signed by this role. No identity inferred from current roster for earlier events."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Employed for day-to-day operations; specified historical fund applications on NAAG behalf may be signed by this role. No identity inferred from current roster for earlier events.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published committee remit assigns employment and day-to-day management role. Specific appointment terms and historical incumbents not reconstructed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-naag-director"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "employs executive director for daily operations",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "NAAG executive director role",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
            "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-member-offices",
      "label": "NAAG member AG offices",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Members receive described collaboration/services and may seek purpose-limited fund grants. Not every member is a signatory, grantee or recipient of a particular investigation grant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Collective role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-member-offices",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-member-offices",
        "name": "NAAG member AG offices",
        "role": "Collective role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Members receive described collaboration/services and may seek purpose-limited fund grants. Not every member is a signatory, grantee or recipient of a particular investigation grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Members receive described collaboration/services and may seek purpose-limited fund grants. Not every member is a signatory, grantee or recipient of a particular investigation grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "NAAG member offices are state and territorial attorneys-general offices using the association's collaborative, research, training and enforcement-support services. Membership itself does not establish participation in a particular letter, investigation or grant.",
        "structuralRole": "Jurisdictional decision-makers supported by shared institutional resources",
        "significance": "The offices retain the public enforcement role while the association supplies capacity and coordination. Fund rules and letter procedures expose two different resource flows: financial assistance for qualifying work and authenticated support for common positions. Following those mechanisms can identify participation without treating the entire membership as one actor.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation and access to support",
            "text": "Member services describe investigation and prosecution expenses, legal consulting, training and research. Purpose-limited fund arrangements require applications and expenditure records, with some recovery-dependent repayments and exceptions for education or travel. The May 2026 letter process requires each jurisdiction's authorised sign-off. NAAG's Center for Consumer Protection directs consumers to state complaint portals and does not resolve their complaints itself.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
              },
              {
                "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-member-capacity",
              "w24-ag-e-vw-purpose",
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-purpose",
              "w24-ag-e-jurisdiction-signoff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Segregated fund can support qualifying enforcement, experts and education. Litigation-success repayment is limited by law/recovery and excludes conferences, education/training and travel events; not uniformly repayable loans. Written AG/director applications, bills/receipts and June30 accounting specified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may finance purpose-limited work with conditional repayment",
            "sourceName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "targetName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "MOU permits investigation/prosecution expenses, experts, consulting and education with segregated purpose limits, conditional recovery-based repayment and education/travel exceptions. Applications and finance bills/receipts supply expenditure trail; no named later grantee or actual payment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may finance qualifying investigations and training",
            "sourceName": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "targetName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AGs or designated staff authenticate, confirm/reject for jurisdiction and record name/email/title. Retained signature images cover joined initiatives, not blanket permission. No private account or actual 2025 audit trail acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-jurisdiction-signoff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "confirm or reject each circulated draft under process",
            "sourceName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "targetName": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "date": "Version May 2026; no retrospective application inferred."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FAQ identifies member service fees, registration receipts and settlement-origin investment proceeds as operating sources, with stewarded funds separated/restricted. No annual audited denominator, contribution amount or Cash App-specific deposit. Stated no-corporate-donation policy is not a transaction audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-resource-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supply service fees under stated operating model",
            "sourceName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Member services and CCP describe investigation/prosecution expenses, legal consulting, training, research and communications. CCP directs consumers to state complaint portals and cannot resolve complaints itself. Specific grant, investigator or letter expenditure not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-member-capacity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
              },
              {
                "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes grants, expertise and collaboration support",
            "sourceName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "targetName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
            "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-consolidated",
      "label": "Current consolidated consumer/charity fund committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Seven-person current roster and enforcement/training remit, observed 9 September 2026. No amendment transfers every 2012/2016 special-committee rule or Cash App allocation to this body.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-consolidated",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-consolidated",
        "name": "Current consolidated consumer/charity fund committee",
        "role": "Committee",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Seven-person current roster and enforcement/training remit, observed 9 September 2026. No amendment transfers every 2012/2016 special-committee rule or Cash App allocation to this body.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Seven-person current roster and enforcement/training remit, observed 9 September 2026. No amendment transfers every 2012/2016 special-committee rule or Cash App allocation to this body."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Seven-person current roster and enforcement/training remit, observed 9 September 2026. No amendment transfers every 2012/2016 special-committee rule or Cash App allocation to this body.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current seven-person committee has consumer-protection/charity enforcement and training remit. Page does not supply approval threshold, Cash App allocation or amendment mapping the older three-/five-AG special committees to it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-consolidated-remit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes separate fund-oversight committee",
            "sourceName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "targetName": "Current consolidated consumer/charity fund committee",
            "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
            "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
      "label": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Purpose-limited segregated fund. Rules describe USD 20m settlement provision to NAAG, principal grants, conditional repayment and 1% fees. Current balance/application and actual receipts unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Fund"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-vw-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
        "name": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
        "role": "Fund",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Purpose-limited segregated fund. Rules describe USD 20m settlement provision to NAAG, principal grants, conditional repayment and 1% fees. Current balance/application and actual receipts unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Purpose-limited segregated fund. Rules describe USD 20m settlement provision to NAAG, principal grants, conditional repayment and 1% fees. Current balance/application and actual receipts unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The VW Settlement Fund is a segregated, purpose-limited resource governed by NAAG's 2016 rules for consumer-protection enforcement, investigation support and education. Those rules describe a $20 million settlement provision, rather than a current balance.",
        "structuralRole": "Settlement-origin funding for later qualifying enforcement capacity",
        "significance": "The fund can convert settlement resources into experts, investigations and training for member offices. Its voting, accounting and repayment rules determine how that capacity is allocated. This creates a reusable institutional resource, but does not establish funding for any particular later Cash App or nonconsensual-imagery initiative.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Grant and administration rules",
            "text": "The rules allow principal grants approved by two affirmative special-committee votes, with decisions final and without appeal. Written applications, bills or receipts and annual accounting provide an expenditure trail. Repayment after successful litigation is conditional on law and recovery, with education, conference and travel exceptions. A 1% administration fee is authorised at inception and annually. Conditional dissolution can move remaining funds to NAAG's General Fund; no current fee calculation, grant disbursement or dissolution transfer was established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-grants",
              "w24-ag-e-vw-purpose",
              "w24-ag-e-vw-fee",
              "w24-ag-e-vw-dissolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Segregated fund can support qualifying enforcement, experts and education. Litigation-success repayment is limited by law/recovery and excludes conferences, education/training and travel events; not uniformly repayable loans. Written AG/director applications, bills/receipts and June30 accounting specified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may finance purpose-limited work with conditional repayment",
            "sourceName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "targetName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2016 rules permit principal grants; two affirmative votes approve, decisions final without appeal. Committee also approves investment policy. Recusal, purpose and accounting rules constrain authority; actual applications/votes/disbursements not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-grants"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves principal grants by two affirmative votes",
            "sourceName": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "targetName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "If special committee determines purpose no longer exists, Executive Committee may dissolve and direct remaining funds to NAAG General Fund. Conditional authority, not observed transfer; not transplanted to FSF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-dissolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may dissolve upon specified purpose determination",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2016 rules authorize 1.0% of total fund value at inception and annually, covering administration/third-party costs. Rate authorization, not a calculated current fee or observed payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-fee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes inception and annual administration fee",
            "sourceName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
      "label": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Under 2016 rules: presidential appointment with Executive Committee approval, no more than two same-party members, two votes for grants, applicant-office recusal/replacement. Present authority/amendments unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-vw-committee",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
        "name": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
        "role": "Committee",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Under 2016 rules: presidential appointment with Executive Committee approval, no more than two same-party members, two votes for grants, applicant-office recusal/replacement. Present authority/amendments unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Under 2016 rules: presidential appointment with Executive Committee approval, no more than two same-party members, two votes for grants, applicant-office recusal/replacement. Present authority/amendments unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Under 2016 rules: presidential appointment with Executive Committee approval, no more than two same-party members, two votes for grants, applicant-office recusal/replacement. Present authority/amendments unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2016 rules permit principal grants; two affirmative votes approve, decisions final without appeal. Committee also approves investment policy. Recusal, purpose and accounting rules constrain authority; actual applications/votes/disbursements not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-grants"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves principal grants by two affirmative votes",
            "sourceName": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "targetName": "VW Settlement Fund — 2016 rules",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2016 rules require appointments from NAAG Executive Committee, with at most two members of one party. Applicant member office triggers temporary replacement under section E. No named vote or actual recusal record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-appoint"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG president role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appoints three-AG committee subject to approval",
            "sourceName": "NAAG president role",
            "targetName": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2016 rules give Executive Committee appointment approval. This is separate from the special committee grant votes; present consolidated-committee authority is not inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-appointment-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "VW fund three-AG special committee",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-vw-allocation",
      "label": "2016 VW partial-settlement allocation as described in rules",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2016 rules recite a partial settlement providing USD 20m to NAAG for specified consumer-protection purposes and investigation reimbursement. Underlying payment records not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Historical instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-vw-allocation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-vw-allocation",
        "name": "2016 VW partial-settlement allocation as described in rules",
        "role": "Historical instrument",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2016 rules recite a partial settlement providing USD 20m to NAAG for specified consumer-protection purposes and investigation reimbursement. Underlying payment records not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2016 rules recite a partial settlement providing USD 20m to NAAG for specified consumer-protection purposes and investigation reimbursement. Underlying payment records not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2016 rules recite a partial settlement providing USD 20m to NAAG for specified consumer-protection purposes and investigation reimbursement. Underlying payment records not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Historical instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2016 VW rules recite a USD 20m settlement provision for consumer-protection oversight, training/enforcement and investigation reimbursement. Underlying settlement receipts not obtained; this is neither current balance nor a contribution tied to the Cash App/NCII matters. Financial details: value: 20,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement provision described in 2016 fund rules; receipt unverified; period: June 2016 partial settlement as recited",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-vw-provision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "rules describe specified settlement allocation",
            "sourceName": "2016 VW partial-settlement allocation as described in rules",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-fsf",
      "label": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "MOU effective 31 October 2012: purpose-limited segregated resources for investigation, experts and training. Five-judgment USD 15m wording preserved without inferring aggregate USD 75m received.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Fund"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-fsf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-fsf",
        "name": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
        "role": "Fund",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "MOU effective 31 October 2012: purpose-limited segregated resources for investigation, experts and training. Five-judgment USD 15m wording preserved without inferring aggregate USD 75m received.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "MOU effective 31 October 2012: purpose-limited segregated resources for investigation, experts and training. Five-judgment USD 15m wording preserved without inferring aggregate USD 75m received."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "MOU effective 31 October 2012: purpose-limited segregated resources for investigation, experts and training. Five-judgment USD 15m wording preserved without inferring aggregate USD 75m received.",
        "structuralRole": "Fund",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "MOU permits investigation/prosecution expenses, experts, consulting and education with segregated purpose limits, conditional recovery-based repayment and education/travel exceptions. Applications and finance bills/receipts supply expenditure trail; no named later grantee or actual payment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may finance qualifying investigations and training",
            "sourceName": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "targetName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "At least USD 5,000: three votes; smaller: two votes from different parties. Principal available; decisions final without appeal. Not a claim that today’s consolidated body uses this unamended rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-grants"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves grants using size and party thresholds",
            "sourceName": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "targetName": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "MOU authorizes 1.0% of total fund value at NAAG fiscal-year close. Current balance, fee application and payment not obtained; unlike VW, no dissolution-to-General-Fund clause is imported.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-fee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes annual administration fee at fiscal close",
            "sourceName": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
      "label": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2012 MOU: annual terms, no more than three same-party members; three votes for grants at least USD 5,000, two cross-party votes below. Present authority/amendments unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Committee"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-fsf-committee",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
        "name": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
        "role": "Committee",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "2012 MOU: annual terms, no more than three same-party members; three votes for grants at least USD 5,000, two cross-party votes below. Present authority/amendments unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2012 MOU: annual terms, no more than three same-party members; three votes for grants at least USD 5,000, two cross-party votes below. Present authority/amendments unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2012 MOU: annual terms, no more than three same-party members; three votes for grants at least USD 5,000, two cross-party votes below. Present authority/amendments unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2012 MOU: one-year terms, no more than three same-party members, Executive Committee approval. Applicant-office committee member requires temporary replacement. No present appointment or recusal implementation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-appoint"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG president role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appoints five-AG committee subject to approval",
            "sourceName": "NAAG president role",
            "targetName": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "At least USD 5,000: three votes; smaller: two votes from different parties. Principal available; decisions final without appeal. Not a claim that today’s consolidated body uses this unamended rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-grants"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves grants using size and party thresholds",
            "sourceName": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "targetName": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2012 appointment approval is distinct from the special committee grant-decision thresholds. Current consolidation or delegation amendment not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-fsf-appointment-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Executive Committee",
            "targetName": "Financial Services Fund five-AG special committee",
            "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-foundation",
      "label": "NAAG Mission Foundation Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Separate IRS-return identity; 2024 Type I supporting-organization reporting names NAAG as sole supported body. Foundation support categories are not association-wide revenue or a complete control map.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-foundation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-foundation",
        "name": "NAAG Mission Foundation Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Separate IRS-return identity; 2024 Type I supporting-organization reporting names NAAG as sole supported body. Foundation support categories are not association-wide revenue or a complete control map.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate IRS-return identity; 2024 Type I supporting-organization reporting names NAAG as sole supported body. Foundation support categories are not association-wide revenue or a complete control map."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate IRS-return identity; 2024 Type I supporting-organization reporting names NAAG as sole supported body. Foundation support categories are not association-wide revenue or a complete control map.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Foundation 2024 Schedule A names NAAG, reports USD 0 monetary support and USD 5,192,939 other support; Schedule R lists related organization. Other support is not cash and this is not association-wide budget or complete operational-control proof. Financial details: value: 5,192,939; currency: USD; kind: Foundation-reported other support; not cash payment; period: Calendar 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-foundation-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports other support to its sole supported organization",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Mission Foundation Inc.",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "Calendar tax year 2024; return signed 14 November 2025, release date unestablished."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
            "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-procedure",
      "label": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Four bipartisan sponsors, at least 10 business days, jurisdictional sign-on audit and recirculation on edits; 36-state threshold for NAAG letterhead/distribution. Not automatically the August 2025 procedure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Published procedure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-procedure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-procedure",
        "name": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
        "role": "Published procedure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Four bipartisan sponsors, at least 10 business days, jurisdictional sign-on audit and recirculation on edits; 36-state threshold for NAAG letterhead/distribution. Not automatically the August 2025 procedure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Four bipartisan sponsors, at least 10 business days, jurisdictional sign-on audit and recirculation on edits; 36-state threshold for NAAG letterhead/distribution. Not automatically the August 2025 procedure."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "NAAG's May 2026 Policy Letter Process describes how a proposed joint letter is sponsored, circulated, authenticated and distributed. It is a documented coordination procedure, not a source of legislative or judicial authority.",
        "structuralRole": "Rules converting jurisdictional consent into institutional presentation",
        "significance": "The procedure makes collective support traceable: individual offices join a specific text, revisions invalidate earlier signatures, and a numerical threshold governs NAAG presentation. These steps matter because an association-branded letter can carry considerable public weight while depending on separate jurisdictional decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Sponsorship, signatures and distribution",
            "text": "A proposal needs at least two Democratic and two Republican sponsors, a draft and colleague letter, named contacts, and a deadline at least ten business days ahead. Authorised offices confirm or reject participation and provide identifying staff information. Any edit requires recirculation and voids prior signatures. At thirty-six signatory states, NAAG supplies letterhead and coordinated distribution; below that threshold sponsors disseminate a signed letter themselves. This May 2026 version does not establish the actual August 2025 workflow.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-policy-procedure",
              "w24-ag-e-jurisdiction-signoff",
              "w24-ag-e-letterhead-threshold"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "At 36 signatory states NAAG letterhead, coordinated releases and electronic transmission; below threshold, states receive signed letter with sponsor seals and disseminate themselves. Distribution threshold, not legislative/court authority or proof of historical votes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-letterhead-threshold"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets 36-state threshold for association distribution",
            "sourceName": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "targetName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "date": "Version May 2026; exact effective day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "May 2026 process requires at least two Democratic/two Republican sponsors, a draft and colleague letter, named contacts and deadline at least 10 business days ahead. Any edit requires new circulation and voids prior signatures. Not proof of August 2025 drafting steps.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-policy-procedure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes sponsorship and circulation requirements",
            "sourceName": "National Association of Attorneys General",
            "targetName": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "date": "Version May 2026; exact adoption day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AGs or designated staff authenticate, confirm/reject for jurisdiction and record name/email/title. Retained signature images cover joined initiatives, not blanket permission. No private account or actual 2025 audit trail acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-jurisdiction-signoff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
                "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "confirm or reject each circulated draft under process",
            "sourceName": "NAAG member AG offices",
            "targetName": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026",
            "date": "Version May 2026; no retrospective application inferred."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
            "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "label": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Asks six payment firms for controls and proactive seller-authorization removal using private rules. No compulsory deadline/order or established recipient response; NCII scope, not blanket pornography prohibition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advocacy instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "name": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
        "role": "Advocacy instrument",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Asks six payment firms for controls and proactive seller-authorization removal using private rules. No compulsory deadline/order or established recipient response; NCII scope, not blanket pornography prohibition.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Asks six payment firms for controls and proactive seller-authorization removal using private rules. No compulsory deadline/order or established recipient response; NCII scope, not blanket pornography prohibition."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
            "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 11
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The 22 August 2025 payment-platform letter is a coordinated request from 47 attorneys general concerning sellers of tools and content for deepfake nonconsensual intimate imagery. It addresses Visa, Mastercard, American Express, PayPal, Google Pay and Apple Pay.",
        "structuralRole": "Public enforcement pressure directed at private seller-access rules",
        "significance": "The letter targets payment access as a way to affect the commercial supply of abusive imagery. Its mechanism is to ask firms to enforce their own terms and acceptable-use policies more proactively. That connects public officials to private authorisation decisions without itself issuing a court order or identifying a bank-level instruction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Demands and subsequent pressure",
            "text": "The payment text asks recipients to describe existing controls and commit to further seller exclusion. It carries NAAG letterhead, and Pennsylvania's official announcement credits Vermont AG Charity Clark with authorship. Idaho AG Raul Labrador later warned of legal consequences in September 2025. The retained record establishes these requests and pressure, but no compulsory response deadline or confirmed recipient implementation. Its scope is nonconsensual imagery and associated sellers, rather than a general pornography prohibition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
                "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-payment-endorsement",
              "w24-ag-e-letterhead",
              "w24-ag-e-clark-authorship",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-visa",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-mastercard",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-amex",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-paypal",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-google",
              "w24-ag-e-demand-apple",
              "w24-ag-e-idaho-warning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to American Express legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-amex"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American Express Company",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "American Express Company",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Google Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-google"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Google",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Mastercard legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-mastercard"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Apple Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-apple"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Apple Inc.",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to PayPal legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "PayPal",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Visa legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-visa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Visa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Visa",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "19 September official newsletter presents safeguards or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. A signatory public warning makes consequence-free-persuasion framing inadequate, but supplies no filed action, operative order or company outcome; not attributed to every co-signatory.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-idaho-warning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
                "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Raul Labrador — Idaho AG, September 2025 statement",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reiterated demand and threatened legal consequences",
            "sourceName": "Raul Labrador — Idaho AG, September 2025 statement",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "date": "Official newsletter 19 September 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Combined dated letters and official announcement identify 47-AG coalition. Payment body seeks control descriptions and commitments to proactive NCII seller exclusion under private rules. No compulsory deadline, statutory order, sanction or proved recipient action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-payment-endorsement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "endorsed requests to payment-platform counsel",
            "sourceName": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
            "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
            "title": "Response/outcome search: 22 August 2025 NAAG deepfake-NCII letters"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
            "title": "San Francisco notices: the original remains a specific gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-search-letter",
      "label": "22 August 2025 NCII search-platform letter",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Separate body asks for search restrictions, warnings and redirects; Take It Down Act discussion belongs here. Not a proved company change or judicial disposition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advocacy instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-search-letter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-search-letter",
        "name": "22 August 2025 NCII search-platform letter",
        "role": "Advocacy instrument",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Separate body asks for search restrictions, warnings and redirects; Take It Down Act discussion belongs here. Not a proved company change or judicial disposition.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate body asks for search restrictions, warnings and redirects; Take It Down Act discussion belongs here. Not a proved company change or judicial disposition."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate body asks for search restrictions, warnings and redirects; Take It Down Act discussion belongs here. Not a proved company change or judicial disposition.",
        "structuralRole": "Advocacy instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Separate search body asks restrictions, warnings and redirects and discusses Take It Down Act. Do not import that statutory discussion into the payment body or count requested changes as implemented.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-search-endorsement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "endorsed separate search-provider requests",
            "sourceName": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII search-platform letter",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-letter-coalition",
      "label": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Dated coalition described by official participant account and combined signed letters. Collective endorsement does not mean every signatory authored the text or adopted Idaho subsequent threat framing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Collective role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-letter-coalition",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-letter-coalition",
        "name": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
        "role": "Collective role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Dated coalition described by official participant account and combined signed letters. Collective endorsement does not mean every signatory authored the text or adopted Idaho subsequent threat framing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated coalition described by official participant account and combined signed letters. Collective endorsement does not mean every signatory authored the text or adopted Idaho subsequent threat framing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Dated coalition described by official participant account and combined signed letters. Collective endorsement does not mean every signatory authored the text or adopted Idaho subsequent threat framing.",
        "structuralRole": "Collective role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Combined dated letters and official announcement identify 47-AG coalition. Payment body seeks control descriptions and commitments to proactive NCII seller exclusion under private rules. No compulsory deadline, statutory order, sanction or proved recipient action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-payment-endorsement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "endorsed requests to payment-platform counsel",
            "sourceName": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Separate search body asks restrictions, warnings and redirects and discusses Take It Down Act. Do not import that statutory discussion into the payment body or count requested changes as implemented.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-search-endorsement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII search-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "endorsed separate search-provider requests",
            "sourceName": "47-AG NCII letter coalition",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII search-platform letter",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-clark",
      "label": "Charity Clark — Vermont AG, letter attribution",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Pennsylvania official announcement attributes letter authorship to Vermont AG Charity Clark; original drafts/staff authorship not obtained. No claimed fund-control or reimbursement link.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-clark",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-clark",
        "name": "Charity Clark — Vermont AG, letter attribution",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Pennsylvania official announcement attributes letter authorship to Vermont AG Charity Clark; original drafts/staff authorship not obtained. No claimed fund-control or reimbursement link.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Pennsylvania official announcement attributes letter authorship to Vermont AG Charity Clark; original drafts/staff authorship not obtained. No claimed fund-control or reimbursement link."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Charity Clark, Vermont's attorney general, is publicly credited with authorship of the combined payment-platform and search-provider letters issued by a 47-attorney-general coalition in August 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Attributed author of a multistate pressure initiative",
        "significance": "Authorship places Clark at the formulation stage: turning a shared concern about deepfake nonconsensual imagery into demands directed at private intermediaries. Signing, institutional circulation and subsequent company decisions are separate stages, so this attribution does not establish control over every jurisdiction or recipient.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Basis of the attribution",
            "text": "The Pennsylvania attorney general's official announcement credits Clark and names five co-sponsors. The retained record does not include original drafts or the staff composition behind them. It therefore supports the public authorship attribution without reconstructing individual drafting contributions or linking Clark to a particular fund expenditure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-clark-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Pennsylvania participant announcement attributes combined-letter authorship to Vermont AG Charity Clark and names five co-sponsors. Original drafts and individual staff composition are unknown; not proof she controlled every signature or subsequent company decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-clark-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "official announcement attributes authorship to her",
            "sourceName": "Charity Clark — Vermont AG, letter attribution",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "date": "Attribution published 26 August 2025 concerning letters dated 22 August; drafting date unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Independent editorial challenge upheld the keystone assessment within the AI-risk/prohibition network, with boundaries on historical donor attribution, operational leadership, policymaker access versus drafting, and intellectual influence versus organizational control.",
            "matched": [
              "attribution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "50b01e33d1a6d5aac0a5213b316813fc02641448cbc3adae9e6689db2549dfc1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
            "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
            "heading": "6. Geneva: do not promote speeches or a summary into a negotiated agreement",
            "text": "Priority missing record: actual final Co-Chairs' Summary and annexed submissions, especially any TFS/CeSIA/CHAI contribution, followed by the attribution/version trail. Root should treat this as a defined public-document access gap, not evidence of concealment or adoption.",
            "matched": [
              "attribution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "099b198e675175f9ae4668225b5e10fedb9ae1969f49aced240dba77b691a291"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
            "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record",
            "heading": "Account closures exist in the public record — under a separately named operation",
            "text": "No recovered record joins Lighthouse to those closures. That is a missing attribution, not proof Lighthouse was uninvolved. The candidate therefore creates a separate Huntsman operation and aggregate outcome, with no Lighthouse edge. The paper's closure passage derives from the AUSTRAC publication family; it is not a second independent confirmation.",
            "matched": [
              "attribution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8c6ab8dbf7b2134048918cd20af444db4ae7112dc629869c9c5efe6c63f9cfeb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
            "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making",
            "heading": "Integration and next discriminating record",
            "text": "No mention of Lantern or Tech Coalition was found in the complete extracted order/stipulation or case/notice reading. That does not prove Cash App never uses those systems; it means this instrument supplies no attribution to them. General account restriction, transaction error, redress eligibility and Lantern signal correction remain separate mechanisms unless a later record joins them.",
            "matched": [
              "attribution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3f733cb8baa3a3a39506f9d71fef0408687d5b5e43522958e58d6874c84aecc4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-labrador",
      "label": "Raul Labrador — Idaho AG, September 2025 statement",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Signatory whose later official newsletter warns of legal consequences. His statement is not an order, company response or proof of every AG position.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-labrador",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-labrador",
        "name": "Raul Labrador — Idaho AG, September 2025 statement",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Signatory whose later official newsletter warns of legal consequences. His statement is not an order, company response or proof of every AG position.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Signatory whose later official newsletter warns of legal consequences. His statement is not an order, company response or proof of every AG position."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
            "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Raul Labrador, Idaho's attorney general and a signatory to the 2025 coalition letters, publicly renewed their demands in a 19 September 2025 official newsletter.",
        "structuralRole": "Signatory escalating public pressure toward legal consequences",
        "significance": "Labrador's intervention shows that the letters operated within an enforcement setting: recipients were publicly told to improve safeguards or face legal consequences. This adds a concrete pressure mechanism to the original requests while leaving any subsequent filing, order or company commitment to be established separately.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the later statement adds",
            "text": "The newsletter restates demands on payment processors and search providers concerning deepfake nonconsensual imagery and links the separate letters. It reports no recipient reply, agreed implementation, meeting or enforcement filing. Its claims about continuing company conduct remain Labrador's account; separately reported child-protection enforcement results are not outcomes of these letters.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
                "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-idaho-warning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "19 September official newsletter presents safeguards or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. A signatory public warning makes consequence-free-persuasion framing inadequate, but supplies no filed action, operative order or company outcome; not attributed to every co-signatory.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-idaho-warning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
                "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reiterated demand and threatened legal consequences",
            "sourceName": "Raul Labrador — Idaho AG, September 2025 statement",
            "targetName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "date": "Official newsletter 19 September 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
            "title": "Response/outcome search: 22 August 2025 NAAG deepfake-NCII letters",
            "heading": "Strongest primary follow-up",
            "text": "Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador's 19 September 2025 newsletter returns to the 47-AG letters, restates demands on payment processors and search providers, and presents implementation or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. It links separate search/payment letters. This is documented subsequent public pressure by a signatory. It reports no company reply, agreed commitment, meeting, particular enforcement filing or implemented change. Its assertions about continuing company conduct remain the AG's assertions, not an independent audit of platform behavior. The newsletter's separately claimed ICAC results are not an outcome of these letters and are not used here.",
            "matched": [
              "Raul Labrador"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "39e2f2ce983505d4fe4b4acb8260380675181a2b7469bf8b7d8b2a12bcf91bd2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
            "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
            "title": "Response/outcome search: 22 August 2025 NAAG deepfake-NCII letters"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-amex",
      "label": "American Express Company",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Payment-letter addressee through its chief legal officer. Requested action does not establish receipt, agreement or implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-amex",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-amex",
        "name": "American Express Company",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Payment-letter addressee through its chief legal officer. Requested action does not establish receipt, agreement or implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Payment-letter addressee through its chief legal officer. Requested action does not establish receipt, agreement or implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Payment-letter addressee through its chief legal officer. Requested action does not establish receipt, agreement or implementation.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to American Express legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-amex"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "American Express Company",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-apple",
      "label": "Apple Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Payment letter addresses company counsel concerning Apple Pay. No policy change or reply tied to this letter is established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w24-ag-apple",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-apple",
        "name": "Apple Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Payment letter addresses company counsel concerning Apple Pay. No policy change or reply tied to this letter is established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Payment letter addresses company counsel concerning Apple Pay. No policy change or reply tied to this letter is established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state-coordination",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Apple appears in several distinct legal and policy settings: as the company addressed concerning Apple Pay, as an app-store operator receiving reported San Francisco notices, and as applicant in a UK investigatory-powers case.",
        "structuralRole": "Payment, distribution and litigation roles within one company",
        "significance": "Apple's presence connects different control points that should be investigated separately. Payment authorisation can affect a seller's revenue, app-store action can affect distribution, and litigation can contest state demands. Evidence of one route does not show that Apple exercised the others in response.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented interventions",
            "text": "The 22 August 2025 attorneys-general letter asks Apple Pay's legal representatives about controls against sellers of deepfake nonconsensual intimate imagery. Later reporting describes San Francisco app-specific notices. WIRED quotes Apple saying it removed three apps, was terminating a developer and required four others to address violations; these are company-attributed responses rather than independently observed removals. Separately, Apple is the named applicant in the 7 April 2025 public UK tribunal judgment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-apple",
              "w25-sf-e-apple-response",
              "w32-gdi-e-appleparty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Apple Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w24-ag-e-demand-apple"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "Apple Inc.",
            "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Apple is the applicant in the caption. Liberty/PI proceedings are separately acknowledged with possible overlap; no completed joinder is claimed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-appleparty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is the applicant named in the public ruling",
            "sourceName": "Apple Inc.",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "WIRED publishes Apple’s account: three apps removed, developer termination in progress and four others required to address violations. Not independently observed app removal, completed developer termination or payment disconnection; exact action dates unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-apple-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported responsive app enforcement through a spokesperson",
            "sourceName": "Apple Inc.",
            "targetName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "date": "Reporting/update date, not established date of each app action."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Later SF intervention reportedly identifies apps in confidential attachments and requests action. It is not the earlier NAAG letter; notice originals and precise legal sufficiency remain unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-demand-apple"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly requested action against identified nudify apps",
            "sourceName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "targetName": "Apple Inc.",
            "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          },
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
            "title": "San Francisco notices: the original remains a specific gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Prosecuting office in the California action; named recipient of Briver judgment payments and compliance information. Office assertions and court duties remain separate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "name": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
        "role": "Public authority",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Prosecuting office in the California action; named recipient of Briver judgment payments and compliance information. Office assertions and court duties remain separate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Prosecuting office in the California action; named recipient of Briver judgment payments and compliance information. Office assertions and court duties remain separate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The San Francisco City Attorney's Office brings the cited civil action over AI-generated sexually explicit imagery and receives compliance information and penalty payments required by the Briver judgment. It also sponsored legislation and reportedly sent later app-store notices.",
        "structuralRole": "Public enforcement office combining litigation, investigation and intermediary notices",
        "significance": "The office links legal authority to several practical access points: operators, domain records, service providers and app distribution. These routes have different effects. Obtaining subscriber information can identify a defendant; a judgment can impose obligations; a notice can seek action under another legal mechanism.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the retained records establish",
            "text": "The signed Briver judgment requires $100,000 in civil penalties and defined reporting and domain-compliance duties; receipts and later reports were not acquired. A sworn declaration describes contact-record production following subpoenas to Cloudflare, Namecheap, Name.com and Google, which is evidence-gathering rather than a takedown order. The city separately reported ten sites offline or inaccessible in California. July 2026 reporting describes notices to Apple and Google, but the originals and delivery records were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
                "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
              },
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-penalty",
              "w25-sf-e-reports-to-city",
              "w25-sf-e-production-cloudflare",
              "w25-sf-e-production-namecheap",
              "w25-sf-e-production-namecom",
              "w25-sf-e-production-google",
              "w25-sf-e-announced-shutdown",
              "w25-sf-e-notice-issuance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
              "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
              "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-penalty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owes scheduled civil penalties to the office",
            "sourceName": "Briver LLC",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Committee staff connects the office’s2024 case and difficulty reaching overseas/fictitious operators to expansion toward enablers, expressly including payment processors. This is a published design rationale, not a recipient-specific liability finding or motive about revenue.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-litigation-rationale"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied litigation-based rationale for facilitator liability",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-reports-to-city"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must deliver network information and recurring compliance proof",
            "sourceName": "Briver LLC",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-inspection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may inspect domain-related records for judgment compliance",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "Briver LLC",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Email requests written SF requirements and discusses possible territorial restrictions. Offer and claimed capability do not establish implementation or an issuing-provider command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-operator-city"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offered cooperation and requested written requirements",
            "sourceName": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2024-12-25 – 2024-12-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public action described in the court documents; Briver settlement and Sol Ecom alternative-service motion are different parts of the case.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-prosecution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "prosecuted the action for the People",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The named public official acts through the office for the People; public litigation role only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-chiu-office"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "acted as City Attorney in this proceeding",
            "sourceName": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to their named registrar Namecheap, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-production-namecheap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Namecheap, Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
            "sourceName": "Namecheap, Inc.",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
            "title": "San Francisco notices: the original remains a specific gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-chiu",
      "label": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named sponsor of AB 621 in March 2025 committee analysis; public official bringing the cited litigation. No private role or motive inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-chiu",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-chiu",
        "name": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named sponsor of AB 621 in March 2025 committee analysis; public official bringing the cited litigation. No private role or motive inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named sponsor of AB 621 in March 2025 committee analysis; public official bringing the cited litigation. No private role or motive inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "David Chiu is the San Francisco City Attorney acting for the People of California in the cited deepfake-website litigation. The March 2025 legislative analysis also identifies him as AB 621's sponsor.",
        "structuralRole": "Public litigator translating enforcement experience into legislation",
        "significance": "Chiu connects a specific enforcement case to a broader statutory proposal. His public rationale sought greater reach over qualifying facilitators, explicit prosecutor standing and stronger penalties. That gives the investigation a documented policy trajectory instead of requiring an inferred motive from his office's presence in the litigation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded rationale",
            "text": "The committee analysis links the proposal to the office's 2024 litigation against sixteen websites and difficulties reaching overseas or fictitious operators. It reproduces Chiu's support for facilitator liability and deterrence. In the Briver judgment he appears through his public office for the People; that court instrument supplies the specific negotiated obligations and does not extend them to every website named in the broader campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-chiu-office",
              "w25-sf-e-sponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
              "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March 18 committee analysis identifies Chiu as sponsor and reproduces his case for facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties. No private drafting contract or undisclosed direction established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-sponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as sponsor of",
            "sourceName": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The named public official acts through the office for the People; public litigation role only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-chiu-office"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "acted as City Attorney in this proceeding",
            "sourceName": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The analysis identifies San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu as sponsor and Rebecca Bauer-Kahan as author. It connects the proposal to Chiu's2024 litigation against16 websites. Staff explicitly identifies payment processors as potential enabling-service defendants and explains the difficulty of reaching underlying operators. Chiu's reproduced support statement argues for broader facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties to strengthen deterrence. These are documented design aims, not inferred motives. See PDF1,7-8,17.",
            "matched": [
              "Attorney",
              "David Chiu"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a477a7d4d5efc5ac3d8558c6580d0728573688133ae3c83e7a99cdf7da3b3925"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
            "heading": "Identity, signature and legal stage",
            "text": "The case is People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237 , San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and Briver LLC (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.",
            "matched": [
              "Attorney",
              "David Chiu"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7bcdf3c7f4e81b2b3ac024ed643ea68e641518d2458947263125b60e54e4a2a0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated support list names the City Attorney's Office, California District Attorneys Association, Consumer Attorneys of California and Joyful Heart Foundation. California Civil Liberties Advocacy is listed as opposing unless amended, with free-expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. The analysis says the author offered the primary-purpose narrowing and prints its proposed redline. It does not establish which outside party obtained that concession or its later adoption. See PDF12-13,17-18. SAG-AFTRA's sponsorship is attributed to predecessor AB602, not this bill.",
            "matched": [
              "Attorney"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4c31fa892047616042698194238c9f35ac416fc195cccfb04d2ed29287f44abf"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
            "heading": "Money and preserved claims",
            "text": "¶19–23, PDF 5: the judgment imposes USD 100,000 in civil penalties . Briver must pay the City Attorney’s Office USD 50,000 within 30 days of effectiveness, then five USD 10,000 instalments dated July 1, August 1, September 1, October 1 and November 1, 2025 , by wire under city instructions. The schedule totals USD 100,000; it does not prove receipt. Paragraph 22 provides acceleration upon failure to receive payment within one business day of a deadline, with ten-percent annual interest on unpaid balance. The packet does not establish that default occurred or calculate an actual accrued balance.",
            "matched": [
              "Attorney"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d6c209a5b0f85fa58a6ec2ca5f9ab14117d04e3d2a3a645112dec353132762d1"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-bauer-kahan",
      "label": "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — AB 621 author",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Bill author identified in the official March analysis; offered primary-purpose clarification. Exact subsequent adoption amendment not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-bauer-kahan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-bauer-kahan",
        "name": "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — AB 621 author",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Bill author identified in the official March analysis; offered primary-purpose clarification. Exact subsequent adoption amendment not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Bill author identified in the official March analysis; offered primary-purpose clarification. Exact subsequent adoption amendment not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan is the California legislator identified as AB 621's author in the Assembly Privacy committee's 18 March 2025 analysis. The bill concerns civil remedies for prohibited sexually explicit deepfakes and liability for qualifying facilitators.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative author shaping facilitator-liability boundaries",
        "significance": "The authorship role links an enforcement problem raised by San Francisco's litigation to proposed statutory language. The committee record also shows that scope was contested: service-provider burdens, expression and federal-law concerns were part of the discussion rather than absent from the lawmaking process.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented drafting contribution",
            "text": "The official analysis describes a primary-purpose clarification offered by the author and prints proposed language. It identifies David Chiu as sponsor and explains the difficulty of reaching underlying website operators. That document supports the attributed proposal; it does not establish the exact later amendment that adopted each phrase or which outside participant secured a final boundary.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official analysis identifies the author and describes her proposed clarification. The proposed redline is not proof of adoption on March 24; later wording timing is unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authored and offered primary-purpose clarification for",
            "sourceName": "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — AB 621 author",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The analysis identifies San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu as sponsor and Rebecca Bauer-Kahan as author. It connects the proposal to Chiu's2024 litigation against16 websites. Staff explicitly identifies payment processors as potential enabling-service defendants and explains the difficulty of reaching underlying operators. Chiu's reproduced support statement argues for broader facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties to strengthen deterrence. These are documented design aims, not inferred motives. See PDF1,7-8,17.",
            "matched": [
              "author",
              "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a477a7d4d5efc5ac3d8558c6580d0728573688133ae3c83e7a99cdf7da3b3925"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "california-ai-auditors-enacted",
            "title": "California’s AI auditor laws are enacted",
            "heading": "What to follow next",
            "text": "The laws’ general effective date is January1,2027; qualification and registry deadlines come later. SB813’s author expressly identifies the January2027 date, while AB1405 follows the ordinary non-urgency rule. Author announcement .",
            "matched": [
              "author"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b16f50b9d2efc60fbd055495d5a49937583cfde48036a600b56c5977753ce090"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Closed 9 September 2026 after the authorised public-source pass. This packet adds an author-attributed report of a 2026–27 Service Agreement signing and a meeting involving the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. It does not acquire the agreement, a pilot specification, an industry contribution or a private right to select police work.",
            "matched": [
              "author"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dea394c8863e8ebd015c92ead1ad8e2ff3955f600fcccc3c8e292c817855c14f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input",
            "heading": "Where the policy places judgment",
            "text": "Annex1 compares legal and scholarly approaches and notes absence of a universally agreed definition. Its external legal references remain the author's comparison; this run did not independently verify the current laws, lists or incident entries. The policy text's chosen definition is not itself a statute or proof of mandatory government instructions.",
            "matched": [
              "author"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1b93b1da002e03bf641b914760646d5d50d900ab8a620e11f4fb8076c9c429be"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-civil-liberties-advocacy",
      "label": "California Civil Liberties Advocacy",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Listed as opposing AB 621 unless amended in the18 March analysis; objections concern expression, federal law and service-provider burdens. No amendment victory attributed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-civil-liberties-advocacy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-civil-liberties-advocacy",
        "name": "California Civil Liberties Advocacy",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Listed as opposing AB 621 unless amended in the18 March analysis; objections concern expression, federal law and service-provider burdens. No amendment victory attributed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Listed as opposing AB 621 unless amended in the18 March analysis; objections concern expression, federal law and service-provider burdens. No amendment victory attributed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed as opposing AB 621 unless amended in the18 March analysis; objections concern expression, federal law and service-provider burdens. No amendment victory attributed.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated analysis records expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. No claim that this group obtained the final boundaries.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-opposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposed unless amended",
            "sourceName": "California Civil Liberties Advocacy",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The dated support list names the City Attorney's Office, California District Attorneys Association, Consumer Attorneys of California and Joyful Heart Foundation. California Civil Liberties Advocacy is listed as opposing unless amended, with free-expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. The analysis says the author offered the primary-purpose narrowing and prints its proposed redline. It does not establish which outside party obtained that concession or its later adoption. See PDF12-13,17-18. SAG-AFTRA's sponsorship is attributed to predecessor AB602, not this bill.",
            "matched": [
              "California Civil Liberties Advocacy"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4c31fa892047616042698194238c9f35ac416fc195cccfb04d2ed29287f44abf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "label": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Chapter 673 approved/filed 13 October 2025, effective 1 January 2026. Third-party liability and a conditional notice presumption have separate predicates and statutory exceptions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-ab621",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "name": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
        "role": "Legislation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Chapter 673 approved/filed 13 October 2025, effective 1 January 2026. Third-party liability and a conditional notice presumption have separate predicates and statutory exceptions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Chapter 673 approved/filed 13 October 2025, effective 1 January 2026. Third-party liability and a conditional notice presumption have separate predicates and statutory exceptions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — official procedural history",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "California AB 621 became Chapter 673 of the 2025 statutes, amending Civil Code section 1708.86. Approved and filed on 13 October 2025 and effective 1 January 2026, it expands civil-law mechanisms concerning prohibited sexually explicit deepfakes and certain enabling services.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory route from abusive services to knowing facilitators",
        "significance": "The law addresses an enforcement problem identified in committee analysis: underlying website operators may be overseas or difficult to identify. Reaching qualifying facilitators can bring accessible intermediaries into a case. Liability still depends on the specified conduct, knowledge or recklessness and applicable exceptions, rather than an intermediary's mere presence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Liability and notice mechanics",
            "text": "Section 1708.86(b)(3) covers knowing facilitation or reckless aiding and abetting within the statutory scope. A depicted individual or public prosecutor can provide specified evidence and service information through the designated process. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within thirty days after receipt creates a presumption, subject to an investigation extension; notice itself is not adjudication. Prosecutors may seek injunctions and civil penalties of $25,000 per violation or $50,000 for malicious violations. Those are available remedies, not assessed amounts.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-litigation-rationale",
              "w25-sf-e-facilitation-rule",
              "w25-sf-e-presumption-design",
              "w25-sf-e-public-remedies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "A depicted individual/public prosecutor must supply sufficient evidence of enabling an ongoing violating service, name it, generally describe enabling services and supply contact details; use prominently displayed designated process if present. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within 30 days after receipt supplies the presumption; a court may extend for investigation. No automatic adjudication or universal30-day immunity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-presumption-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "establishes a receipt-based conditional presumption",
            "sourceName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "targetName": "Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption",
            "date": "Effective-date anchor, not receipt of any particular notice or expiration of the legal mechanism."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public prosecutors may seek injunction/equitable relief, USD 25,000 per violation or USD 50,000 malicious violation, reasonable fees and other court relief without proof of actual harm to the depicted individual. These are remedy conditions, not assessed or received money. Private claimant damages are a different menu.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-public-remedies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public prosecutors under 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes civil enforcement and court-awarded remedies",
            "sourceName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "targetName": "Public prosecutors under 1708.86",
            "date": "Effective-date anchor; actual judgment and quantum require their own record."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Committee staff connects the office’s2024 case and difficulty reaching overseas/fictitious operators to expansion toward enablers, expressly including payment processors. This is a published design rationale, not a recipient-specific liability finding or motive about revenue.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-litigation-rationale"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied litigation-based rationale for facilitator liability",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CIV 1708.86(b)(3) covers knowing facilitation or reckless aiding/abetting of prohibited creation/disclosure. Service primary purpose, underlying conduct and statutory/federal/ISP exceptions matter. It does not designate every host, app store, bank or AI service.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-facilitation-rule"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Enabling-service providers — statutory class",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "creates conditional civil exposure for specified facilitation",
            "sourceName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "targetName": "Enabling-service providers — statutory class",
            "date": "Effective date; not a finding that a particular provider violated the statute. Duties are not represented as ending on this date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March 18 committee analysis identifies Chiu as sponsor and reproduces his case for facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties. No private drafting contract or undisclosed direction established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-sponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as sponsor of",
            "sourceName": "David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official analysis identifies the author and describes her proposed clarification. The proposed redline is not proof of adoption on March 24; later wording timing is unestablished.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-author"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — AB 621 author",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authored and offered primary-purpose clarification for",
            "sourceName": "Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — AB 621 author",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated analysis records expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. No claim that this group obtained the final boundaries.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-opposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
                "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Civil Liberties Advocacy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposed unless amended",
            "sourceName": "California Civil Liberties Advocacy",
            "targetName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — official procedural history",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
            "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-notice-presumption",
      "label": "Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "CIV 1708.86(c)(2): sufficient evidence, qualifying sender, named service and enabling relationship, designated process if displayed, receipt and30 days; court-extension and statutory protections remain. No automatic liability judgment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legal mechanism"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-notice-presumption",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-notice-presumption",
        "name": "Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption",
        "role": "Legal mechanism",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "CIV 1708.86(c)(2): sufficient evidence, qualifying sender, named service and enabling relationship, designated process if displayed, receipt and30 days; court-extension and statutory protections remain. No automatic liability judgment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CIV 1708.86(c)(2): sufficient evidence, qualifying sender, named service and enabling relationship, designated process if displayed, receipt and30 days; court-extension and statutory protections remain. No automatic liability judgment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CIV 1708.86(c)(2): sufficient evidence, qualifying sender, named service and enabling relationship, designated process if displayed, receipt and30 days; court-extension and statutory protections remain. No automatic liability judgment.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal mechanism",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "A depicted individual/public prosecutor must supply sufficient evidence of enabling an ongoing violating service, name it, generally describe enabling services and supply contact details; use prominently displayed designated process if present. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within 30 days after receipt supplies the presumption; a court may extend for investigation. No automatic adjudication or universal30-day immunity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-presumption-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "establishes a receipt-based conditional presumption",
            "sourceName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "targetName": "Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption",
            "date": "Effective-date anchor, not receipt of any particular notice or expiration of the legal mechanism."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-facilitator-class",
      "label": "Enabling-service providers — statutory class",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "A role defined by actual enabling conduct and the legal predicates; not a finding that every app store, bank, host or AI service is liable.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Regulated class"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-facilitator-class",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-facilitator-class",
        "name": "Enabling-service providers — statutory class",
        "role": "Regulated class",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A role defined by actual enabling conduct and the legal predicates; not a finding that every app store, bank, host or AI service is liable.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "A role defined by actual enabling conduct and the legal predicates; not a finding that every app store, bank, host or AI service is liable."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A role defined by actual enabling conduct and the legal predicates; not a finding that every app store, bank, host or AI service is liable.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulated class",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CIV 1708.86(b)(3) covers knowing facilitation or reckless aiding/abetting of prohibited creation/disclosure. Service primary purpose, underlying conduct and statutory/federal/ISP exceptions matter. It does not designate every host, app store, bank or AI service.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-facilitation-rule"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              },
              {
                "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "creates conditional civil exposure for specified facilitation",
            "sourceName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "targetName": "Enabling-service providers — statutory class",
            "date": "Effective date; not a finding that a particular provider violated the statute. Duties are not represented as ending on this date."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-prosecutor-role",
      "label": "Public prosecutors under 1708.86",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Includes AGs, city attorneys, county counsel, district attorneys and other city/county prosecutors. Courts determine remedies; no automatic assessed amount from a letter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority class"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-prosecutor-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-prosecutor-role",
        "name": "Public prosecutors under 1708.86",
        "role": "Public authority class",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Includes AGs, city attorneys, county counsel, district attorneys and other city/county prosecutors. Courts determine remedies; no automatic assessed amount from a letter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Includes AGs, city attorneys, county counsel, district attorneys and other city/county prosecutors. Courts determine remedies; no automatic assessed amount from a letter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Includes AGs, city attorneys, county counsel, district attorneys and other city/county prosecutors. Courts determine remedies; no automatic assessed amount from a letter.",
        "structuralRole": "Public authority class",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public prosecutors may seek injunction/equitable relief, USD 25,000 per violation or USD 50,000 malicious violation, reasonable fees and other court relief without proof of actual harm to the depicted individual. These are remedy conditions, not assessed or received money. Private claimant damages are a different menu.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-public-remedies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes civil enforcement and court-awarded remedies",
            "sourceName": "AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86",
            "targetName": "Public prosecutors under 1708.86",
            "date": "Effective-date anchor; actual judgment and quantum require their own record."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "label": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Reported July 16 notices and confidential attachments were not acquired. Reported28-day response request is distinct from the statutory30-day receipt condition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-july-notices",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "name": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
        "role": "Reported instrument",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Reported July 16 notices and confidential attachments were not acquired. Reported28-day response request is distinct from the statutory30-day receipt condition.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported July 16 notices and confidential attachments were not acquired. Reported28-day response request is distinct from the statutory30-day receipt condition."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "These are the San Francisco notices to Apple and Google reported in July 2026 concerning apps associated with deepfake nudification. The Chronicle describes notices dated 16 July, confidential app attachments and a twenty-eight-day response request.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported service-specific pressure on app distribution",
        "significance": "The notices connect California's expanded facilitator-liability framework to named distribution intermediaries. Their reported specificity distinguishes them from the earlier general attorneys-general warning. Whether they satisfy every statutory notice predicate depends on the actual evidence, routing and receipt records, which were not acquired.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported requests and company responses",
            "text": "The Chronicle says the notices cite the earlier 47-AG warning and threaten civil enforcement. The requested twenty-eight-day response period is distinct from the statute's thirty-day condition measured from receipt. WIRED quotes Apple reporting three app removals, developer termination in progress and required changes to four other apps; Google reported suspending five identified apps. These are attributed company responses, without independent availability measurements or proof of payment disconnection.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              },
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              },
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-notice-issuance",
              "w25-sf-e-prior-letter-citation",
              "w25-sf-e-demand-apple",
              "w25-sf-e-demand-google",
              "w25-sf-e-apple-response",
              "w25-sf-e-google-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
              "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "WIRED publishes Apple’s account: three apps removed, developer termination in progress and four others required to address violations. Not independently observed app removal, completed developer termination or payment disconnection; exact action dates unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-apple-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported responsive app enforcement through a spokesperson",
            "sourceName": "Apple Inc.",
            "targetName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "date": "Reporting/update date, not established date of each app action."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Chronicle says the later SF notices cite the47-AG warning. This is a reported document link; the old general letter alone does not establish current(c)(2) service-specific evidence, routing, receipt or subsequent failure predicates.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-prior-letter-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
              },
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reportedly cited as earlier notice",
            "sourceName": "22 August 2025 NCII payment-platform letter",
            "targetName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "WIRED publishes Google’s account that five identified apps were suspended. This is a company statement connected to the SF intervention, not independent availability measurement or proof of bank/payment action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-google-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported five identified app suspensions through a spokesperson",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "date": "Reporting/update date; individual suspension dates unestablished."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Later SF intervention reportedly identifies apps in confidential attachments and requests action. It is not the earlier NAAG letter; notice originals and precise legal sufficiency remain unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-demand-apple"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
                "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly requested action against identified nudify apps",
            "sourceName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "targetName": "Apple Inc.",
            "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Chronicle reports July 16 notices, confidential app attachments,28-day response request and threatened civil enforcement. Actual notices, attachments and delivery/receipt records were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-notice-issuance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
                "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly sent notices to Apple and Google",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting",
            "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
            "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
            "title": "San Francisco notices: the original remains a specific gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
            "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-case",
      "label": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Multi-defendant California action. Briver’s settlement is company-specific; the Tilak declaration supports alternative service on Sol Ecom. No all-defendant judgment inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Court case"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-case",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-case",
        "name": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
        "role": "Court case",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Multi-defendant California action. Briver’s settlement is company-specific; the Tilak declaration supports alternative service on Sol Ecom. No all-defendant judgment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Multi-defendant California action. Briver’s settlement is company-specific; the Tilak declaration supports alternative service on Sol Ecom. No all-defendant judgment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Multi-defendant California action. Briver’s settlement is company-specific; the Tilak declaration supports alternative service on Sol Ecom. No all-defendant judgment inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Court case",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Tilak declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom. Captioned respondent status is not judgment liability or proof of service completion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-sol-case"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sol Ecom, Inc. — captioned respondent",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named in the alternative-service proceeding",
            "sourceName": "Sol Ecom, Inc. — captioned respondent",
            "targetName": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
            "date": "2025-06-13 – 2025-06-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public action described in the court documents; Briver settlement and Sol Ecom alternative-service motion are different parts of the case.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-prosecution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "prosecuted the action for the People",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          },
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-superior-court",
      "label": "San Francisco Superior Court",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Court issuing the signed, filed Briver judgment; continuing jurisdiction and noticed-motion conditions are documented. Separate docket query was not performed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Court"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-superior-court",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-superior-court",
        "name": "San Francisco Superior Court",
        "role": "Court",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Court issuing the signed, filed Briver judgment; continuing jurisdiction and noticed-motion conditions are documented. Separate docket query was not performed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Court issuing the signed, filed Briver judgment; continuing jurisdiction and noticed-motion conditions are documented. Separate docket query was not performed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "San Francisco Superior Court is the court handling People v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., case CGC-24-617237. It signed the Briver stipulated final judgment and retains the specified role in enforcing or modifying that instrument.",
        "structuralRole": "Judicial authority over a defined settlement and its enforcement",
        "significance": "The court supplies a decision point beyond an office's allegation or demand. Its signature makes the negotiated obligations effective, while later contested penalties require a violation finding through a noticed proceeding. That structure limits the inference that the city can unilaterally expand the judgment after settlement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The acquired instrument",
            "text": "The judge signed on 29 May 2025, with filing and clerk service stamped 30 May. The judgment's signature date controls effectiveness. Further relief and enforcement costs require the specified motion and hearing process; changes require court approval, including when the parties consent in writing. This is a judgment against Briver within a larger case, not a disposition against every captioned defendant. A separate register-of-actions query was not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-court-judgment",
              "w25-sf-e-further-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Additional penalties, enforcement costs and relief require noticed motion/hearing and violation finding. Modification requires court order or written consent plus court approval; materially false/inaccurate information route requires proof. Individuals’ private claims remain preserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-further-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains conditional enforcement and modification authority",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco Superior Court",
            "targetName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Judge signature29 May 2025; filing stamp and clerk service30 May. Paragraph6 makes signature the effective date. Signed counterparts resolve the other blank signature page; no separate docket entry acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-court-judgment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed the Briver final judgment",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco Superior Court",
            "targetName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
            "heading": "Identity, signature and legal stage",
            "text": "The case is People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237 , San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and Briver LLC (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.",
            "matched": [
              "San Francisco Superior Court"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7bcdf3c7f4e81b2b3ac024ed643ea68e641518d2458947263125b60e54e4a2a0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-briver",
      "label": "Briver LLC",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Stipulating defendant in the signed judgment. Defined associated-person scope is in the instrument; no merger with other defendants or service providers. Payment/compliance unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-briver",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-briver",
        "name": "Briver LLC",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Stipulating defendant in the signed judgment. Defined associated-person scope is in the instrument; no merger with other defendants or service providers. Payment/compliance unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Stipulating defendant in the signed judgment. Defined associated-person scope is in the instrument; no merger with other defendants or service providers. Payment/compliance unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Briver LLC is the defendant that stipulated to a final judgment in San Francisco's multi-defendant action over websites creating sexually explicit AI transformations of identifiable people. The judgment binds Briver and its defined associated-person scope, rather than every defendant in the case.",
        "structuralRole": "Specific operator subject to continuing judicial obligations",
        "significance": "Briver provides a concrete example of enforcement reaching operational assets: domain registrations, website activity and compliance information. The judgment combines a permanent operating restriction with time-limited domain and reporting duties. Its precision makes it more informative than attributing an aggregate website-shutdown announcement to a single defendant.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What Briver agreed to",
            "text": "The judgment was signed on 29 May 2025 and entered into without proof or admissions of the disputed allegations. It bars specified website operations or assistance, requires defined domains to remain registered but inactive for five years, and requires information and sworn compliance reports. It also imposes $100,000 in civil penalties: $50,000 within thirty days, followed by five $10,000 instalments from July through November 2025. The retained record establishes those obligations, without payment receipts or continuing-compliance evidence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-briver-settlement",
              "w25-sf-e-operating-bar",
              "w25-sf-e-domain-control",
              "w25-sf-e-reports-to-city",
              "w25-sf-e-penalty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-penalty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "owes scheduled civil penalties to the office",
            "sourceName": "Briver LLC",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Paragraph 15 prohibits transferring registration of the defined Briver Websites and requires maintaining their registrations in inactive hold/lock status for five years so the domains do not resolve. Paragraphs 17–18 require no ownership transfer and documentary proof of continued Briver/affiliate registration. This is a non-transfer obligation; there is no missing transfer-recipient question or independent registrar command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-domain-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "prohibits registration transfer and requires five years of domain inactivity",
            "sourceName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "targetName": "Briver LLC",
            "date": "Five-year obligation measured from effective date; performance not observed."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph14 bars owning, operating or aiding/abetting websites using AI to convert clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images. No express consent exception. The five-year domain/reporting period does not expressly terminate this permanent bar.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-operating-bar"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permanently prohibits the specified image-transformation operation",
            "sourceName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "targetName": "Briver LLC",
            "date": "Effective-date anchor; prohibition is permanent, not a one-day or five-year restriction."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-reports-to-city"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must deliver network information and recurring compliance proof",
            "sourceName": "Briver LLC",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "People and Briver stipulate without taking proof or admitting alleged legal/factual issues; appeal waived. Defined associated-person scope does not merge every captioned defendant or service provider.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-briver-settlement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "stipulated to company-specific obligations without admissions",
            "sourceName": "Briver LLC",
            "targetName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-inspection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may inspect domain-related records for judgment compliance",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "Briver LLC",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Read and captured 9 September 2026. The acquired instrument is a stipulated final judgment against Briver LLC in a multi-defendant case, not a judgment against every website or every captioned defendant. Its court signature and filing stamp are visible. The operative obligations are much more specific than the city announcement, while actual payment and continuing compliance remain unverified.",
            "matched": [
              "Briver LLC"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5c7a92feceff8e4c8e857e04d845a96589396ef3e3232143bf0e46707896d705"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
            "heading": "Identity, signature and legal stage",
            "text": "The case is People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237 , San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and Briver LLC (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.",
            "matched": [
              "Briver LLC"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7bcdf3c7f4e81b2b3ac024ed643ea68e641518d2458947263125b60e54e4a2a0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-sol-ecom",
      "label": "Sol Ecom, Inc. — captioned respondent",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Captioned respondent and subject of Tilak’s alternative-service motion; no Briver settlement obligations assigned to it.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-sol-ecom",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-sol-ecom",
        "name": "Sol Ecom, Inc. — captioned respondent",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Captioned respondent and subject of Tilak’s alternative-service motion; no Briver settlement obligations assigned to it.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Captioned respondent and subject of Tilak’s alternative-service motion; no Briver settlement obligations assigned to it."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Captioned respondent and subject of Tilak’s alternative-service motion; no Briver settlement obligations assigned to it.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Tilak declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom. Captioned respondent status is not judgment liability or proof of service completion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-sol-case"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named in the alternative-service proceeding",
            "sourceName": "Sol Ecom, Inc. — captioned respondent",
            "targetName": "People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237",
            "date": "2025-06-13 – 2025-06-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
            "heading": "Identity, signature and legal stage",
            "text": "The case is People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237 , San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and Briver LLC (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.",
            "matched": [
              "Sol Ecom, Inc."
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7bcdf3c7f4e81b2b3ac024ed643ea68e641518d2458947263125b60e54e4a2a0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "label": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Signed29 May; filed/served30 May 2025. Briver-specific negotiated obligations without proof or admissions; effective date is court-signature date. No separate register-of-actions acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Court order"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "name": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
        "role": "Court order",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Signed29 May; filed/served30 May 2025. Briver-specific negotiated obligations without proof or admissions; effective date is court-signature date. No separate register-of-actions acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Signed29 May; filed/served30 May 2025. Briver-specific negotiated obligations without proof or admissions; effective date is court-signature date. No separate register-of-actions acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the signed stipulated final judgment between the People of California and Briver LLC in People v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al. Its effective date is the court's signature date, 29 May 2025; filing and clerk service are stamped 30 May.",
        "structuralRole": "Court instrument controlling an operator and its domains",
        "significance": "The judgment demonstrates several distinct enforcement mechanisms working together: an operating bar, retained but disabled domain registrations, reporting and court-supervised remedies. Keeping those terms separate explains why a five-year domain condition does not necessarily end a permanent business restriction or command an independent registrar.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope and continuing enforcement",
            "text": "The operating bar covers owning, operating or aiding websites that use AI to turn clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images, without an express consent exception. Defined domains must stay in inactive hold or lock status for five years and cannot be transferred. Reports include model and training-data summaries, rather than an entire training corpus. Further penalties require a noticed motion, hearing and violation finding; modification requires court approval. The parties stipulated without admissions, and private individual claims remain preserved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-court-judgment",
              "w25-sf-e-briver-settlement",
              "w25-sf-e-operating-bar",
              "w25-sf-e-domain-control",
              "w25-sf-e-reporting-order",
              "w25-sf-e-further-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Paragraph 15 prohibits transferring registration of the defined Briver Websites and requires maintaining their registrations in inactive hold/lock status for five years so the domains do not resolve. Paragraphs 17–18 require no ownership transfer and documentary proof of continued Briver/affiliate registration. This is a non-transfer obligation; there is no missing transfer-recipient question or independent registrar command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-domain-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "prohibits registration transfer and requires five years of domain inactivity",
            "sourceName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "targetName": "Briver LLC",
            "date": "Five-year obligation measured from effective date; performance not observed."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Within30 days: website names, API/affiliate source and sharing operators, model/training-data summary and other known similar operators. Within14 days and annually five years: sworn compliance/domain proof. Late attestation requires notice and14-day receipt-based cure before violation. Not a demand for an entire training-data corpus.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-reporting-order"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver compliance reports and network disclosure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires information and sworn documentary attestations",
            "sourceName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "targetName": "Briver compliance reports and network disclosure",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Additional penalties, enforcement costs and relief require noticed motion/hearing and violation finding. Modification requires court order or written consent plus court approval; materially false/inaccurate information route requires proof. Individuals’ private claims remain preserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-further-enforcement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco Superior Court",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains conditional enforcement and modification authority",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco Superior Court",
            "targetName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph14 bars owning, operating or aiding/abetting websites using AI to convert clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images. No express consent exception. The five-year domain/reporting period does not expressly terminate this permanent bar.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-operating-bar"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permanently prohibits the specified image-transformation operation",
            "sourceName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "targetName": "Briver LLC",
            "date": "Effective-date anchor; prohibition is permanent, not a one-day or five-year restriction."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Judge signature29 May 2025; filing stamp and clerk service30 May. Paragraph6 makes signature the effective date. Signed counterparts resolve the other blank signature page; no separate docket entry acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-court-judgment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco Superior Court",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed the Briver final judgment",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco Superior Court",
            "targetName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "People and Briver stipulate without taking proof or admitting alleged legal/factual issues; appeal waived. Defined associated-person scope does not merge every captioned defendant or service provider.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-briver-settlement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "stipulated to company-specific obligations without admissions",
            "sourceName": "Briver LLC",
            "targetName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-briver-reporting",
      "label": "Briver compliance reports and network disclosure",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Paragraph16 information,14-day initial and annual attestations with domain evidence for five years. No actual response or attestation acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Required deliverable"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-briver-reporting",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-briver-reporting",
        "name": "Briver compliance reports and network disclosure",
        "role": "Required deliverable",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Paragraph16 information,14-day initial and annual attestations with domain evidence for five years. No actual response or attestation acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Paragraph16 information,14-day initial and annual attestations with domain evidence for five years. No actual response or attestation acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Paragraph16 information,14-day initial and annual attestations with domain evidence for five years. No actual response or attestation acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Required deliverable",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Within30 days: website names, API/affiliate source and sharing operators, model/training-data summary and other known similar operators. Within14 days and annually five years: sworn compliance/domain proof. Late attestation requires notice and14-day receipt-based cure before violation. Not a demand for an entire training-data corpus.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-reporting-order"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
                "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires information and sworn documentary attestations",
            "sourceName": "Briver final judgment — May 2025",
            "targetName": "Briver compliance reports and network disclosure",
            "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-announced-outcome",
      "label": "Ten sites offline or inaccessible in California — reported",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "City’s2 June 2025 account combines offline and California-inaccessibility outcomes and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Not an independent global shutdown audit or provider-specific instruction.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported outcome"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-announced-outcome",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-announced-outcome",
        "name": "Ten sites offline or inaccessible in California — reported",
        "role": "Reported outcome",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "City’s2 June 2025 account combines offline and California-inaccessibility outcomes and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Not an independent global shutdown audit or provider-specific instruction.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "City’s2 June 2025 account combines offline and California-inaccessibility outcomes and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Not an independent global shutdown audit or provider-specific instruction."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "City’s2 June 2025 account combines offline and California-inaccessibility outcomes and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Not an independent global shutdown audit or provider-specific instruction.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported outcome",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "City reported ten sites offline OR inaccessible in California and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Does not identify each provider’s act or establish permanent worldwide shutdown. Briver’s judgment is one concrete instrument, not a ten-defendant order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-announced-shutdown"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
                "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported the wider outcome of its investigation and lawsuit",
            "sourceName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "targetName": "Ten sites offline or inaccessible in California — reported",
            "date": "2025-06-02 – 2025-06-02"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
            "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-cloudflare",
      "label": "Cloudflare, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named subpoena recipient in the filed declaration; responsive records are reported by counsel. No provider shutdown command or execution established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-cloudflare",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-cloudflare",
        "name": "Cloudflare, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named subpoena recipient in the filed declaration; responsive records are reported by counsel. No provider shutdown command or execution established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named subpoena recipient in the filed declaration; responsive records are reported by counsel. No provider shutdown command or execution established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named subpoena recipient in the filed declaration; responsive records are reported by counsel. No provider shutdown command or execution established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-production-cloudflare"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
            "sourceName": "Cloudflare, Inc.",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-namecheap",
      "label": "Namecheap, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named registrar/subpoena recipient; counsel reports contact records for the two services. No termination inferred from disclosure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-namecheap",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-namecheap",
        "name": "Namecheap, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named registrar/subpoena recipient; counsel reports contact records for the two services. No termination inferred from disclosure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named registrar/subpoena recipient; counsel reports contact records for the two services. No termination inferred from disclosure."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named registrar/subpoena recipient; counsel reports contact records for the two services. No termination inferred from disclosure.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to their named registrar Namecheap, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-production-namecheap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
            "sourceName": "Namecheap, Inc.",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-namecom",
      "label": "Name.com",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named former registrar for ClothOff and subpoena recipient. Exact corporate suffix/identifier not established in inspected scope.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-namecom",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-namecom",
        "name": "Name.com",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named former registrar for ClothOff and subpoena recipient. Exact corporate suffix/identifier not established in inspected scope.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named former registrar for ClothOff and subpoena recipient. Exact corporate suffix/identifier not established in inspected scope."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named former registrar for ClothOff and subpoena recipient. Exact corporate suffix/identifier not established in inspected scope.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff from its named former registrar Name.com. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-production-namecom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
            "sourceName": "Name.com",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead",
            "heading": "Findings and locators",
            "text": "The sworn declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom, not a Briver compliance certification. Paragraphs18–23 report subpoenas and responsive contact records from Cloudflare, Namecheap and former registrar Name.com. Paragraph29 reports Google's June6,2025 production. Paragraphs24–30 describe subsequent notices and correspondence. These are counsel's sworn accounts; actual subpoena and production instruments are not attached in this read scope. They establish a reported disclosure route, not provider shutdown instructions.",
            "matched": [
              "Name.com"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7878fddc21732ad99986d2606b8226e3f2791a1ca2403e282652226f11a27118"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-drawnudes",
      "label": "drawnudes.io — described service",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Service associated by city counsel with the Exhibit6 correspondent. No target-site visit, legal-operator identity resolution or eSafety clearance established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Online service"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-drawnudes",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-drawnudes",
        "name": "drawnudes.io — described service",
        "role": "Online service",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Service associated by city counsel with the Exhibit6 correspondent. No target-site visit, legal-operator identity resolution or eSafety clearance established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Service associated by city counsel with the Exhibit6 correspondent. No target-site visit, legal-operator identity resolution or eSafety clearance established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Service associated by city counsel with the Exhibit6 correspondent. No target-site visit, legal-operator identity resolution or eSafety clearance established.",
        "structuralRole": "Online service",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "January 3 city email says the office understands the correspondent operates Drawnudes and asks whether policies cover other websites. Association is not independently resolved legal ownership or identity with ClothOff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-correspondence-service"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was the service associated with the correspondent by city counsel",
            "sourceName": "drawnudes.io — described service",
            "targetName": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "date": "2025-01-03 – 2025-01-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead",
            "heading": "Findings and locators",
            "text": "Exhibit6 reproduces December2024–January2025 correspondence. A respondent associated by counsel with drawnudes.io claims eSafety requirements and compliance, including alleged January2025 legislation (PDF19,21). The respondent seeks written SF requirements and discusses territorial restrictions (PDF19,22). This is a respondent's account and offer, not independent verification of Australian law, successful compliance, eSafety approval, or regulator-to-regulator coordination. No specific technical restriction or issuing provider is demonstrated by that exchange.",
            "matched": [
              "drawnudes.io"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "36c3e045aef43a98d8c86eb422aabff546cef8eb45a3abb54f7b49465b839461"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The inspected official material does not verify that eSafety imposed a service-specific requirement on drawnudes.io before 25 December 2024, or that it approved or confirmed that service's compliance. It does establish contemporaneous outreach to a different named provider, ClothOff. The exact missing record is the eSafety-to-operator correspondence and any subsequent assessment or confirmation naming drawnudes.io (or a legally identified operator demonstrably responsible for it).",
            "matched": [
              "drawnudes.io"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1ef5c3bfc3b9dc24ae5ff4d72894fdc51f37c0b4e39a43a880cf45a6cd59ac36"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-clothoff",
      "label": "ClothOff — service correspondence",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Named in official eSafety correspondence and separately in the city declaration. No legal-operator merge with Drawnudes, Briver or Sol Ecom is inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Online service"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-clothoff",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-clothoff",
        "name": "ClothOff — service correspondence",
        "role": "Online service",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named in official eSafety correspondence and separately in the city declaration. No legal-operator merge with Drawnudes, Briver or Sol Ecom is inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in official eSafety correspondence and separately in the city declaration. No legal-operator merge with Drawnudes, Briver or Sol Ecom is inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named in official eSafety correspondence and separately in the city declaration. No legal-operator merge with Drawnudes, Briver or Sol Ecom is inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Online service",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "October 3 outreach recommends considering DIS coverage; November reply says likely captured and22 December commencement; December 5 and January 8 follow-ups seek details of changes. This correspondence is not a compliance certificate and supplies no Drawnudes identity join.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-clothoff-outreach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sent preparatory guidance and sought details of claimed changes",
            "sourceName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "targetName": "ClothOff — service correspondence",
            "date": "Actual correspondence span; not an interval of certified compliance."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check",
            "heading": "Decision boundary and candidate relations",
            "text": "The defensible relation is Ali, as reproduced in a filed exhibit, claims prior eSafety contact and compliance confirmation concerning the described service . A second, independently supported relation is eSafety sent ClothOff regulatory guidance and requests for information about claimed changes in 2024–25 . They remain separate records. No edge saying eSafety approved Drawnudes, certified its safeguards, endorsed the business, imposed a particular remedy on it, or confirmed compliance is warranted.",
            "matched": [
              "ClothOff"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ff24996550b39c93149cb2fbc3edc5a60bbd7de7d65edccb30b87ee900024a19"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check",
            "heading": "Decision boundary and candidate relations",
            "text": "The strongest rival explanation is that the operator received ordinary preparatory guidance similar to the released ClothOff correspondence and characterized it as confirmation. Another possibility is a distinct unpublished exchange with a stronger conclusion. The record here discriminates neither. The actual dated outgoing notice/guidance, the operator's response, and eSafety's subsequent assessment are the next useful records; their likely custodians are eSafety and the operator/counsel. This is an identified record gap, not authorization for outreach or a new acquisition branch.",
            "matched": [
              "ClothOff"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "52f54155171f7352073c4c501175ce76936a75f3b0364ca91b8aad76bdda4d5e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?",
            "heading": "Provenance, gap and stopping condition",
            "text": "Carver's separate service-specific lane has identified official ClothOff correspondence in FOILog141/request25202 that expressly invokes the22December2024 DIS commencement. That is a useful separately sourced counterpart for the clock; this lane has not independently reread that bundle and does not join ClothOff to Drawnudes or promote a request for further information into compliance confirmation.",
            "matched": [
              "ClothOff"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "15d1da90dc3416dbea6fe013365101bda1651e824c12b24f1af56b1054386824"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
      "label": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "25 December 2024 email claims requirements, implementation and confirmation tied to January 2025 legislation;4 January follow-up repeats a regulator list. No Australian notice or approval attached in this exhibit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Attributed claim"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-operator-claim",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
        "name": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
        "role": "Attributed claim",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "25 December 2024 email claims requirements, implementation and confirmation tied to January 2025 legislation;4 January follow-up repeats a regulator list. No Australian notice or approval attached in this exhibit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "25 December 2024 email claims requirements, implementation and confirmation tied to January 2025 legislation;4 January follow-up repeats a regulator list. No Australian notice or approval attached in this exhibit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "25 December 2024 email claims requirements, implementation and confirmation tied to January 2025 legislation;4 January follow-up repeats a regulator list. No Australian notice or approval attached in this exhibit.",
        "structuralRole": "Attributed claim",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Email requests written SF requirements and discusses possible territorial restrictions. Offer and claimed capability do not establish implementation or an issuing-provider command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-operator-city"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offered cooperation and requested written requirements",
            "sourceName": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "targetName": "San Francisco City Attorney’s Office",
            "date": "2024-12-25 – 2024-12-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "December 25 operator email says eSafety contacted it, requirements were met and January 2025 AI-law alignment was confirmed; January 4 repeats the claim. No Australian notice/assessment attached. This edge records the claim, not approval, performance or inter-regulator coordination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-operator-esafety"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claims prior requirements and confirmation of compliance",
            "sourceName": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "Claim date; dates and substance of alleged earlier contact unknown. Repeated4 January 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "January 3 city email says the office understands the correspondent operates Drawnudes and asks whether policies cover other websites. Association is not independently resolved legal ownership or identity with ClothOff.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-correspondence-service"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
                "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "drawnudes.io — described service",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was the service associated with the correspondent by city counsel",
            "sourceName": "drawnudes.io — described service",
            "targetName": "Drawnudes correspondent’s eSafety claim",
            "date": "2025-01-03 – 2025-01-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
            "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "label": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "F2024L00710 made 19 June, registered 21 June 2024; explicit22 December commencement corroborated by contemporaneous agency correspondence. Mandatory, category-specific duties; no named-service approval.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "name": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
        "role": "Legislation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "F2024L00710 made 19 June, registered 21 June 2024; explicit22 December commencement corroborated by contemporaneous agency correspondence. Mandatory, category-specific duties; no named-service approval.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "F2024L00710 made 19 June, registered 21 June 2024; explicit22 December commencement corroborated by contemporaneous agency correspondence. Mandatory, category-specific duties; no named-service approval."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australia's Designated Internet Services Class 1A and Class 1B Material Industry Standard 2024 is delegated legislation under the Online Safety Act. It was made on 19 June, registered on 21 June and commenced on 22 December 2024.",
        "structuralRole": "Mandatory service duties with defined material and territorial scope",
        "significance": "The standard creates a legal route by which certain services must build safeguards and contractual enforcement rights into their operations. It also recognises examples of external systems for identifying known pro-terror material. Recognition does not require purchase of a particular vendor or make every private classification legally binding.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Duties and reporting limits",
            "text": "The standard's scope and definitions, including immaterial-risk exclusions, determine which duties apply. Section 22 addresses specified child-abuse and pro-terror output safeguards; section 13 requires relevant terms and restriction or removal rights under stated triggers. Technical and proportionality qualifications remain part of the instrument. Section 36 has limits on the timing and frequency of its particular information requests, while section 38 imposes record retention. Those reporting limits do not defer all substantive duties or establish that any named operator complies.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-made",
              "w25-sf-e-dis-clock",
              "w25-sf-e-dis-contractual-rights",
              "w25-sf-e-dis-report-records",
              "w26-ver-e-dis-example-tat",
              "w26-ver-e-dis-example-gifct"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
              "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section36 request cannot issue before first anniversary under that section and no more than once per 12 months; two-month response period. Section38 requires records for two years after relevant calendar-year end. Other reporting powers and substantive duties are not postponed by these limits; no request or delivery to a particular service acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-report-records"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes bounded reports and requires compliance records",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section5 limits territorial/service scope; section 6 definition and immaterial-risk exclusion control classification. Section22 requires specified child-abuse/pro-terror output safeguards, review and relevant detection; limited control/visibility qualifications matter. Not a finding that this operator is compliant or every adult output prohibited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-clock"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "imposes category-specific duties from 22 December 2024",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
            "date": "Commencement anchor; not an expiry date. Does not verify the operator intended this instrument."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section13 requires terms against class1A/1B use and restriction/removal rights for specified misuse, with appropriate enforcement under specified triggers and subsection6 burden. This is not legal compulsion for every possible private policy or restriction. Technical, encryption and proportionality qualifications elsewhere remain relevant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-contractual-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires particular terms and appropriate enforcement",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
            "date": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-dis-example-gifct"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Made19 June 2024 under Online Safety Act section 145, registered 21 June. This is delegated legislation, not case-specific permission. Existing public-official identity reused.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-made"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made the industry standard under statutory authority",
            "sourceName": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "targetName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "date": "2024-06-19 – 2024-06-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?"
          },
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check"
          },
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
      "label": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Statutory category with scope, classification and control qualifications. Not every AI service, all adult content, or a finding about a particular operator.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Regulated class"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
        "name": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
        "role": "Regulated class",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statutory category with scope, classification and control qualifications. Not every AI service, all adult content, or a finding about a particular operator.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statutory category with scope, classification and control qualifications. Not every AI service, all adult content, or a finding about a particular operator."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "sf-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Statutory category with scope, classification and control qualifications. Not every AI service, all adult content, or a finding about a particular operator.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulated class",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section5 limits territorial/service scope; section 6 definition and immaterial-risk exclusion control classification. Section22 requires specified child-abuse/pro-terror output safeguards, review and relevant detection; limited control/visibility qualifications matter. Not a finding that this operator is compliant or every adult output prohibited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-clock"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "imposes category-specific duties from 22 December 2024",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
            "date": "Commencement anchor; not an expiry date. Does not verify the operator intended this instrument."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section13 requires terms against class1A/1B use and restriction/removal rights for specified misuse, with appropriate enforcement under specified triggers and subsection6 burden. This is not legal compulsion for every possible private policy or restriction. Technical, encryption and proportionality qualifications elsewhere remain relevant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w25-sf-e-dis-contractual-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires particular terms and appropriate enforcement",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS",
            "date": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?",
            "heading": "What the DIS standard actually requires",
            "text": "For a covered high-impact generative-AI DIS, section22(3) requires preventive systems for child-sexual-exploitation/pro-terror outputs; regular model testing/review and prompt mitigation adjustments; differentiation of AI outputs; warnings for Australian users specifically seeking child-abuse images; report/support information for relevant generation terms; and automated detection/action on child-abuse material in training data, prompts and outputs. The notes acknowledge limited model visibility/control and require reliance on available alternatives in those circumstances. PDF33–34/printed29–30, visually checked.",
            "matched": [
              "Covered high-impact generative-AI DIS"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "606dc34629947a0c0c2b284c981d63498e09ec6ea6d9aa8d80b76b1e06772aa8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
            "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?"
          },
          {
            "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
            "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "Tech Against Terrorism",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Counterterrorism-support initiative implemented by Online Harms Foundation. Its public products, corporate implementer and external funders are distinct roles; no item-level donor command inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tat",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tat",
        "name": "Tech Against Terrorism",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Counterterrorism-support initiative implemented by Online Harms Foundation. Its public products, corporate implementer and external funders are distinct roles; no item-level donor command inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Counterterrorism-support initiative implemented by Online Harms Foundation. Its public products, corporate implementer and external funders are distinct roles; no item-level donor command inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
            "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          },
          {
            "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 15
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tech Against Terrorism is a counterterrorism-support initiative implemented by the Online Harms Foundation. Its services include the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform, which collects and verifies material and sends advisory alerts to providers.",
        "structuralRole": "Counterterrorism assessments supplied to online platforms",
        "significance": "Tech Against Terrorism connects institutional support with the collection, assessment and communication of suspected terrorist content. Its alerts are a step towards a platform decision; the receiving operator’s enforcement process is another.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July announcement assigns prospective stewardship to TAT with Jigsaw advisory support. Repository namespace and last observed main commit do not prove present operational vetoes or that no other development exists.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-altitude-stewardship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced it would lead maintenance and development",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-dis-example-tat"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Analyst decisions include removal, non-removal and pending. Reply aim is three to five working days by onboarding email; no actual deadline performance or independent appeal procedure established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes analyst review and an email-response aim",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public summary describes human source/content judgment against policy. Full verification procedure requires a form and was not acquired; no donor item-selection right is supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-verifies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "applies source and content assessment through in-house experts",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The notice names TAT and a supplier PPON; the notice does not establish its company-number signatory or OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-pilot-tat-supplier"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
                "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names TAT as proposed supplier",
            "sourceName": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Operator accounts explain in-house collection/verification and advisory alerts; provider enforcement remains separate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-operates"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates the classification and alerting service",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "TAT names OHF as implementer; this separates the initiative from its legal company and funders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-implements"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "implements the initiative",
            "sourceName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "December 2024 operator account reports over 46,000 files and 182,000 hashes, distinct units. It attributes LLM identification/classification support to Public Safety Canada without a cost allocation or acceptance record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-archive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported building an archive and reusable hash interfaces",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "date": "2024-12-20 – 2024-12-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded static inspection of the public implementation linked by Tech Against Terrorism (TAT), not an installed or deployed system test. Acquisition is closed. No product/API calls, accounts, forms, content feeds, terrorist-content files, dependency installation or repository test suite were used. Canonical cases, readers and ZIPs were untouched.",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Against Terrorism"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7f6300bf2c3a46aa5c4ee2e805d8f8203107b64a65b0395af6de29a4251db5f3"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Finding that changes the map",
            "text": "A publicly released departmental status document records Canada partnering with Tech Against Terrorism to formally launch TCAP 2.0 at the Canada Centre's event of 1–5 May 2023. This earns a dated government participation/delivery relation. It does not establish acceptance of either grant workstream, completion of Phase 2, a contractual milestone, or authorization/payment of a particular instalment.",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Against Terrorism"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d7f5c08d43c722889f45fa8e9fdfd56a838948b9e025345f6a87752b0a86e297"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest new relationship is concrete corporate and financial dependence: Tech Against Terrorism (TAT) is implemented by Online Harms Foundation (OHF); OHF's filed controlling entity is QuantSpark Limited; OHF also reports receiving loans from, being invoiced by, and owing money to QuantSpark. A separate official Canadian award directly funds development of the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform (TCAP). Neither record gives a donor a demonstrated right to order an individual content classification.",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Against Terrorism"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "38b276d13eb181af714447b9f0b9a8228f935640f0f0d7f8cee7996e07bda36e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Finite search and closed frontier",
            "text": "This inquiry used seven focused queries, rather than reopening all award routes: site:publicsafety.gc.ca \"TCAP\" \"results\" ; site:canada.ca \"22841\" \"Terrorist\" ; site:publicsafety.gc.ca \"Tech Against Terrorism\" evaluation ; \"21415\" \"Terrorist Content\" report acceptance ; site:publicsafety.gc.ca (\"21415\" OR \"22841\") ; site:canada.ca \"Terrorist Content Analytics Platform\" (evaluation OR milestones OR acceptance OR results) ; site:publicsafety.gc.ca \"Tech Against Terrorism\" (evaluation OR \"final report\" OR \"performance\") .",
            "matched": [
              "Tech Against Terrorism"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "81c1ba6cc5bd0c5b97c5110b07d168669ad0b038c5c7927dd94df5ce150595dd"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
            "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          },
          {
            "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
            "title": "QuantSpark: filed control and the reciprocal OHF accounts"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
            "title": "UK procurement and policy: what can presently be joined"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "Online Harms Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company 11656320, limited by guarantee without share capital; formerly QuantSpark Foundation until 11 May 2021. Implementer and disclosed contribution recipient, distinct from QuantSpark Limited.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-ohf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "name": "Online Harms Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Company 11656320, limited by guarantee without share capital; formerly QuantSpark Foundation until 11 May 2021. Implementer and disclosed contribution recipient, distinct from QuantSpark Limited.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company 11656320, limited by guarantee without share capital; formerly QuantSpark Foundation until 11 May 2021. Implementer and disclosed contribution recipient, distinct from QuantSpark Limited."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Online Harms Foundation is UK company 11656320, a company limited by guarantee without share capital, formerly named QuantSpark Foundation until 11 May 2021. It implements Tech Against Terrorism and is the foundation identified in Canadian disclosures funding development of the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal implementer and grant recipient with a related-company funding and control dependency",
        "significance": "OHF provides the legal and financial body behind an initiative often discussed by its programme name. Its registered control, consultancy purchases, balances owed and loan reliance connect it materially to QuantSpark Limited. Those are stronger dependencies than a shared logo, while still not proving a controller or donor instructed an individual classification.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Control, liabilities and the award recipient",
            "text": "OHF's control register gives QuantSpark at least 75% of voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. Its July 2025 accounts report GBP913,015 invoiced by QuantSpark and GBP1,554,927 owed, with loan support relevant to going concern. QuantSpark's corresponding figures differ by GBP80 on invoicing and GBP1 on the combined balance; they describe the same relationships, not extra flows. Canadian records name the foundation under its former and current names, supported by the separate company-history crosswalk, rather than naming QuantSpark Limited as award recipient.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              },
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-implements",
              "w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf",
              "w26-ver-e-qs-invoicing",
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-invoicing-account",
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-balance",
              "w26-ver-e-qs-loan-support",
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-recipient",
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Canadian record names QuantSpark Foundation; UK company history supplies the separate crosswalk to OHF company 11656320. The amendment the old label after the UK name change. Not an award to QuantSpark Limited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names the foundation under its former legal name",
            "sourceName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "OHF PSC filing gives QuantSpark at least 75% of voting rights and appointment/removal rights. Guarantee company has no share capital; no item-level instruction inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds registered voting and director-appointment control",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "PSC notification date; current entry observed 9 September 2026, not a one-day exercise."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Public record identifies Online Harms Foundation; no Canadian company number appears, so company 11656320 crosswalk remains a separately sourced identity conclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names OHF as the legal recipient",
            "sourceName": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "TAT names OHF as implementer; this separates the initiative from its legal company and funders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-implements"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "implements the initiative",
            "sourceName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OHF reports GBP 1,554,927 owed. QS separately reports GBP 1,374,157 for services and 180,769 expenses, totaling 1,554,926 by our arithmetic. The GBP 1 difference is unexplained. The entire balance is not characterized as a cash loan; no settlement proved. Financial details: value: 1,554,927; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported amount owed not cash loan total; period: as at 31 July 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-balance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported an outstanding related-party balance",
            "sourceName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "targetName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "QS note 10 reports GBP 913,095 net of VAT for FY2025; OHF reports GBP 913,015. Preserve the GBP 80 difference rather than forcing reconciliation or inferring wrongdoing. No cash payment or TCAP-only allocation established. Financial details: value: 913,095; currency: GBP; kind: QS reported services invoiced net of VAT not receipt; period: year ended 31 July 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-invoicing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported consultancy and other services invoiced to OHF",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OHF note 7 supplies its own GBP 913,015 figure, with VAT basis unspecified. This is the counterparty account of the same relationship, not another additive purchase. Financial details: value: 913,015; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported invoice amount not additive to QS account; period: year ended 31 July 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-invoicing-account"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported by OHF to have invoiced consultancy",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OHF going-concern note records loan reliance and a director assurance that amounts would not be recalled for the following 12 months. Amount, security, interest, project allocation and exact balance components covered remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-loan-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provided loans on which OHF reports relying",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "Financial-statement approval/reporting anchor; not loan origination date or perpetual support."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Prior records retained without upgrading their state",
            "text": "Agreement 21415 : QuantSpark Foundation, initial CAD1,155,622.44; amended total CAD1,256,688.09, with the prior packet preserving the one-day start-date discrepancy and the 22 November 2021 amendment. Agreement 22841 : Online Harms Foundation, CAD1,945,904, disclosed term 1 April 2023–31 March 2026 . The exact detail records and amendment are already retained; they were not reacquired. Legal aliasing to company 11656320 depends on the separate registry evidence, not the Canadian records themselves.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Harms Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b9452807a76c444dd27e72b7fe7ecde68ce27954ecbd81af3366d25093499c96"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest new relationship is concrete corporate and financial dependence: Tech Against Terrorism (TAT) is implemented by Online Harms Foundation (OHF); OHF's filed controlling entity is QuantSpark Limited; OHF also reports receiving loans from, being invoiced by, and owing money to QuantSpark. A separate official Canadian award directly funds development of the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform (TCAP). Neither record gives a donor a demonstrated right to order an individual content classification.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Harms Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "38b276d13eb181af714447b9f0b9a8228f935640f0f0d7f8cee7996e07bda36e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
            "heading": "The new evidence",
            "text": "The Canadian disclosures supply the recipient/project connection that the earlier announcement left indirect. They name QuantSpark Foundation for TCAP agreement 21415 , and Online Harms Foundation for Phase 2 agreement 22841 . Their fields explicitly identify these as recipient legal names. The current official data schema says that field should come from the agreement, and that agreement value means the total stated in the agreement, in CAD , not an amendment increment. These are government-published disclosure assertions about agreements, not the signed instruments themselves.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Harms Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5a08109474a673ad03cd8e752765768ef406f4a624eb1126908c80d3b0bf7a28"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
            "heading": "How this changes the earlier announcement",
            "text": "Identity boundary. The accepted Companies House packet identifies company 11656320 as Online Harms Foundation, previously QuantSpark Foundation until11May 2021. This supports reading these labels as the historical names of the same company, distinct from QuantSpark Limited company 10304694. That legal-name history is retained prior primary research, not a fresh registry inspection in this lane. The November 2021 Canadian amendment continues to display the former Foundation name after the reported UK name change; this may be a legacy agreement label. It is not evidence of a second foundation, an undisclosed recipient or the Limited company itself receiving the Canadian award. No UK company number appears in the inspected Canadian records, so the registry-number crosswalk remains separately sourced.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Harms Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "570ddc8ec72015089667d46b8b3cd858dbc2c5da5eaf43248cda0ce00473929d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
            "title": "QuantSpark: filed control and the reciprocal OHF accounts"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "label": "QuantSpark Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company 10304694, private company limited by shares. Filed controller of OHF and its related supplier/creditor; not the foundation named in Canadian awards.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-quantspark",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "name": "QuantSpark Limited",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Company 10304694, private company limited by shares. Filed controller of OHF and its related supplier/creditor; not the foundation named in Canadian awards.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company 10304694, private company limited by shares. Filed controller of OHF and its related supplier/creditor; not the foundation named in Canadian awards."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark Limited — company 10304694",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "QuantSpark Limited is UK company 10304694, a private company limited by shares. It is the filed controller of Online Harms Foundation and a related supplier and creditor to that foundation. It is distinct from QuantSpark Foundation, the former legal name used in an earlier Canadian contribution record.",
        "structuralRole": "Corporate controller, service supplier and financial supporter of the TAT implementer",
        "significance": "QuantSpark's relationship with OHF combines formal control and practical financial dependence: voting and appointment rights, consultancy invoicing, outstanding balances and loans. That gives the network a concrete corporate structure. It does not identify a Canadian grant as a payment to QuantSpark or prove an individual content instruction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The related-party financial picture",
            "text": "For the year ended 31 July 2025, QuantSpark reports GBP913,095 in services invoiced to OHF net of VAT, while OHF reports GBP913,015 with an unspecified VAT basis. QuantSpark's service and expense balances total GBP1,554,926; OHF reports GBP1,554,927 owed. The differences remain unexplained and the amounts are counterpart accounts, not additive transfers. OHF also reports reliance on QuantSpark loans and an assurance against recall for the following twelve months. Adam Hadley's filed control of QuantSpark includes at least 75% of shares and votes plus director-appointment rights.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf",
              "w26-ver-e-hadley-controls",
              "w26-ver-e-qs-invoicing",
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-invoicing-account",
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-balance",
              "w26-ver-e-qs-loan-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "OHF PSC filing gives QuantSpark at least 75% of voting rights and appointment/removal rights. Guarantee company has no share capital; no item-level instruction inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds registered voting and director-appointment control",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "PSC notification date; current entry observed 9 September 2026, not a one-day exercise."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "At least 75% of shares and votes plus director appointment/removal and significant influence/control; exact percentage and other shareholding unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hadley-controls"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adam Hadley",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds registered share, voting and appointment control",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hadley",
            "targetName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "date": "Notification/appointment date; current filed position observed in 2026, not a one-day exercise."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OHF reports GBP 1,554,927 owed. QS separately reports GBP 1,374,157 for services and 180,769 expenses, totaling 1,554,926 by our arithmetic. The GBP 1 difference is unexplained. The entire balance is not characterized as a cash loan; no settlement proved. Financial details: value: 1,554,927; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported amount owed not cash loan total; period: as at 31 July 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-balance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported an outstanding related-party balance",
            "sourceName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "targetName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "QS note 10 reports GBP 913,095 net of VAT for FY2025; OHF reports GBP 913,015. Preserve the GBP 80 difference rather than forcing reconciliation or inferring wrongdoing. No cash payment or TCAP-only allocation established. Financial details: value: 913,095; currency: GBP; kind: QS reported services invoiced net of VAT not receipt; period: year ended 31 July 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-invoicing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported consultancy and other services invoiced to OHF",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OHF note 7 supplies its own GBP 913,015 figure, with VAT basis unspecified. This is the counterparty account of the same relationship, not another additive purchase. Financial details: value: 913,015; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported invoice amount not additive to QS account; period: year ended 31 July 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ohf-invoicing-account"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported by OHF to have invoiced consultancy",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OHF going-concern note records loan reliance and a director assurance that amounts would not be recalled for the following 12 months. Amount, security, interest, project allocation and exact balance components covered remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-qs-loan-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provided loans on which OHF reports relying",
            "sourceName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": "Financial-statement approval/reporting anchor; not loan origination date or perpetual support."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The strongest new relationship is concrete corporate and financial dependence: Tech Against Terrorism (TAT) is implemented by Online Harms Foundation (OHF); OHF's filed controlling entity is QuantSpark Limited; OHF also reports receiving loans from, being invoiced by, and owing money to QuantSpark. A separate official Canadian award directly funds development of the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform (TCAP). Neither record gives a donor a demonstrated right to order an individual content classification.",
            "matched": [
              "QuantSpark Limited"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "38b276d13eb181af714447b9f0b9a8228f935640f0f0d7f8cee7996e07bda36e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
            "heading": "How this changes the earlier announcement",
            "text": "Identity boundary. The accepted Companies House packet identifies company 11656320 as Online Harms Foundation, previously QuantSpark Foundation until11May 2021. This supports reading these labels as the historical names of the same company, distinct from QuantSpark Limited company 10304694. That legal-name history is retained prior primary research, not a fresh registry inspection in this lane. The November 2021 Canadian amendment continues to display the former Foundation name after the reported UK name change; this may be a legacy agreement label. It is not evidence of a second foundation, an undisclosed recipient or the Limited company itself receiving the Canadian award. No UK company number appears in the inspected Canadian records, so the registry-number crosswalk remains separately sourced.",
            "matched": [
              "QuantSpark Limited"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "570ddc8ec72015089667d46b8b3cd858dbc2c5da5eaf43248cda0ce00473929d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark Limited — company 10304694",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
            "title": "QuantSpark: filed control and the reciprocal OHF accounts"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-hadley",
      "label": "Adam Hadley",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Filed QuantSpark director/controller; company account identifies founder/CEO and shared TAT leadership. Corporate rights are not proof of an individual content decision.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-hadley",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-hadley",
        "name": "Adam Hadley",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Filed QuantSpark director/controller; company account identifies founder/CEO and shared TAT leadership. Corporate rights are not proof of an individual content decision.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Filed QuantSpark director/controller; company account identifies founder/CEO and shared TAT leadership. Corporate rights are not proof of an individual content decision."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
            "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Adam Hadley is a registered director and controlling person of QuantSpark Limited. The company describes him as its founder and chief executive and, in an April 2026 account, as also running Tech Against Terrorism. These records establish a personal bridge across corporate and initiative leadership.",
        "structuralRole": "Individual corporate controller with a reported shared leadership role",
        "significance": "His positions connect the commercial company to the organisation implementing a private classification service. Formal corporate rights are more specific than a casual affiliation, yet do not by themselves identify who approves individual content labels, supervises analysts or acts on a platform.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Control rights and the scope of the biography",
            "text": "QuantSpark's filed record reports Hadley holding at least 75% of shares and voting rights, director appointment and removal rights, and significant influence or control. The band does not disclose an exact percentage. Its 20 April 2026 author biography supplies the shared Tech Against Terrorism leadership description. The retained sources do not include an OHF management agreement or instrument giving Hadley a particular content-approval power, so corporate control and operational classification decisions remain separate claims.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
                "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hadley-controls",
              "w26-ver-e-hadley-leadership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "At least 75% of shares and votes plus director appointment/removal and significant influence/control; exact percentage and other shareholding unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hadley-controls"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "holds registered share, voting and appointment control",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hadley",
            "targetName": "QuantSpark Limited",
            "date": "Notification/appointment date; current filed position observed in 2026, not a one-day exercise."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Company author capsule establishes a reported shared leadership role; it does not specify content-approval powers or an OHF management contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hadley-leadership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
                "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described by QuantSpark as also running TAT",
            "sourceName": "Adam Hadley",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
            "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
            "title": "QuantSpark: filed control and the reciprocal OHF accounts"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "TAT service for collection, classification, alerts and related archive interfaces. Historic reports, current API documentation and the 2024 Altitude adapter have different dates and scopes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical system"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tcap",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "name": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
        "role": "Technical system",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "TAT service for collection, classification, alerts and related archive interfaces. Historic reports, current API documentation and the 2024 Altitude adapter have different dates and scopes.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TAT service for collection, classification, alerts and related archive interfaces. Historic reports, current API documentation and the 2024 Altitude adapter have different dates and scopes."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Terrorist Content Analytics Platform is Tech Against Terrorism's service for collecting, classifying and alerting platforms to terrorist-content material, with related archive and application-programming interfaces. It combines in-house assessment and partner referrals with information that recipient services can use in their own review processes.",
        "structuralRole": "Private classification and alert source feeding platform and shared-database workflows",
        "significance": "TCAP occupies the consequential step where collected material becomes a labelled signal that other organisations may trust. Public funding supports development and official guidance recommends the service in relevant circumstances, while inclusion rules and recipient policy still determine what enters a database or results in action.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Classification, alerts and correction semantics",
            "text": "Its policies combine selected designation authorities with Tech Against Terrorism's consensus, threat and splinter assessments. Delisting follows removal from all followed lists, while historical pre-delisting material continues to be alerted. The Year 2 report describes 36 disputes about automated URL-availability status, with 35 changed; these are not terrorist-label reversals. Current hash interfaces separately document withdrawal metadata and feedback. GIFCT applies its own inclusion parameters to TCAP inputs. The older Altitude adapter receives URL-alert metadata and must not be treated as evidence about the current hash API's correction handling.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-operates",
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-scope",
              "w26-ver-e-guide-tcap",
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-policy-scope",
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-status-corrections",
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-gifct-filter",
              "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-relaunch",
              "w26-ver-e-microsoft-pilot",
              "w26-ver-e-api-onboarding",
              "w26-ver-e-tfp-referrals",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-trust-priority",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-optional-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Export requires diagnostics active and maps BLOCK to REMOVE. Selection uses the latest review in the interval without the inspected condition requiring published state or successful downstream delivery. This is code semantics, not observed false reporting or TCAP acceptance of a disagreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-optional-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can return optional URL and decision diagnostics",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Selected designation authorities combine with TAT consensus/threat and splinter assessments. Entity removal from all followed lists triggers delisting; historical pre-delisting material continues to be alerted. This is not a worked correction of a false item label.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-policy-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets inclusion, imitation and delisting parameters",
            "sourceName": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pinned code assigns confidence component 3 for TCAP or other qualifying evidence. Separate severity contributes to priority, so TCAP alone does not guarantee top overall rank. Neither confidence nor queue rank is a moderation verdict or calibrated probability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-trust-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "treats TCAP as trusted in its confidence heuristic",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "TAT describes categorized partner URL submissions with analyst/AI review and metadata for platform requests. Five-tier/125-plus-platform claims are advertised capabilities, not proof of universal integration or mandatory takedown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tfp-referrals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advertises vetted partner referrals into the alerting workflow",
            "sourceName": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2024 adapter imports source identifier/report date, group text, flags, URL and availability. This is the older URL-alert interface; it is not evidence of current content-hash deletion handling or ignored corrections.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies URL-alert metadata in the inspected adapter",
            "sourceName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Two publicly described workstreams identify intended outputs. No cost annex allocates the contribution specifically to Altitude, the LLM, an API or a supplier invoice; no accepted milestone acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies archive/classification and moderation-workflow development",
            "sourceName": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Authentication introduction presupposes an existing onboarded TCAP or Archive account. It does not publish the current decision-maker, full eligibility contract or unrestricted access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-api-onboarding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires prior onboarding for authenticated API use",
            "sourceName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "targetName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Taxonomy names TCAP but requires GIFCT inclusion parameters too. This filter defeats an inference that every TCAP label automatically enters HSDB.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-gifct-filter"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies URL-hash inputs subject to GIFCT’s own parameters",
            "sourceName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
            "title": "UK procurement and policy: what can presently be joined"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tcap-policy",
      "label": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Selected legal designation inputs combined with TAT source/content assessment, imitation/splinter rules and delisting choices. Full verification policy not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tcap-policy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tcap-policy",
        "name": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Selected legal designation inputs combined with TAT source/content assessment, imitation/splinter rules and delisting choices. Full verification policy not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Selected legal designation inputs combined with TAT source/content assessment, imitation/splinter rules and delisting choices. Full verification policy not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Selected legal designation inputs combined with TAT source/content assessment, imitation/splinter rules and delisting choices. Full verification policy not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Selected designation authorities combine with TAT consensus/threat and splinter assessments. Entity removal from all followed lists triggers delisting; historical pre-delisting material continues to be alerted. This is not a worked correction of a false item label.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-policy-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets inclusion, imitation and delisting parameters",
            "sourceName": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public summary describes human source/content judgment against policy. Full verification procedure requires a form and was not acquired; no donor item-selection right is supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-verifies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
                "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "applies source and content assessment through in-house experts",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP inclusion and verification rules",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "label": "Public Safety Canada",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Department disclosing TCAP contributions and their recipient/workstream scope. Departmental endorsement, contractual acceptance and payment are separate evidence states.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "name": "Public Safety Canada",
        "role": "Public authority",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Department disclosing TCAP contributions and their recipient/workstream scope. Departmental endorsement, contractual acceptance and payment are separate evidence states.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Department disclosing TCAP contributions and their recipient/workstream scope. Departmental endorsement, contractual acceptance and payment are separate evidence states."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public Safety Canada is the Canadian government department disclosing contributions for Tech Against Terrorism's platform development and the Christchurch Call Foundation's work. Its records identify recipient organisations, agreement values and intended workstreams, placing public resources behind privately operated safety infrastructure.",
        "structuralRole": "Government sponsor connecting contribution funding to named organisations and development objectives",
        "significance": "The department can shape funded capacity through award selection, budgets and reporting conditions. The disclosed projects connect archive and classification work, moderation workflows and support for smaller platforms. Funding a capability is distinct from approving a particular content decision, accepting a deliverable or confirming that an instalment was paid.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Award values and the limits of general terms",
            "text": "Agreement 21415's amended TCAP total is CAD1,256,688.09; Phase 2 agreement 22841 specifies CAD1,945,904 for 1 April 2023–31 March 2026. A separate Foundation agreement 26007 displays CAD1,369,064 for 23 October 2025–31 March 2028. These are contribution values, not observed cash receipts. Current Community Resilience Fund terms describe approved budgets, reporting and payment controls and preserve recipient independence, but their May 2026 wording is not proven incorporated into the earlier agreements. No acquired budget annex allocates a specific supplier invoice or product feature to those awards.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-original-value",
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-amended-value",
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-execution-report",
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-value",
              "w26-ver-e-crf-approval-rules",
              "w26-ver-e-crf-ip-and-selection",
              "w26-ver-e-canada-us-funding-report",
              "w27-roost-e-canada-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Amended total CAD 1,256,688.09 replaces the earlier total; derived increase CAD 101,065.65 is not another award. Displayed start is 25 February 2020, one day earlier than original; end 31 March 2022. No signed amendment or payment acquired. Financial details: value: 1,256,688.09; currency: CAD; kind: revised total not additive to original not payment; period: agreement 21415 after 22 November 2021 amendment",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-amended-value"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed an increased total for the same contribution",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "date": "2021-11-22 – 2021-11-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Government disclosure and 3 May announcement corroborate CAD 1,945,904 for OHF. Two records concern one award. Term 1 April 2023–31 March 2026 is not evidence of completed delivery or cash paid. Financial details: value: 1,945,904; currency: CAD; kind: contribution agreement value not disbursement; period: stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-value"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed and announced the Phase 2 contribution",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "date": "Official announcement anchor; exact signature date not stated."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Original public record states CAD 1,155,622.44 for agreement 21415. Its period is 26 February 2020–30 September 2021. This is an agreement-value disclosure, not a payment. Financial details: value: 1,155,622.44; currency: CAD; kind: original contribution total superseded not payment; period: displayed period 26 February 2020–30 September 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-original-value"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed the original contribution total",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recipient copyright remains; a permanent nonexclusive royalty-free departmental licence may be given, not automatic ownership. Redistribution needs prior approval while recipients independently choose beneficiaries and are not government agents. No specific licence/redistribution exercise proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-crf-ip-and-selection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits the department’s stated IP and onward-funding rights",
            "sourceName": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
            "targetName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "date": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Record 26007 displays CAD 1,369,064, term 23 October 2025–31 March 2028. Disclosure establishes awarded/agreement value, not disbursement or acceptance of all work. Financial details: value: 1,369,064; currency: CAD; kind: disclosed contribution value; period: 23 October 2025–31 March 2028",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-canada-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed a contribution agreement value and expected results",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "date": "2025-10-23 – 2028-03-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections 8,12–13,15.2 and 15.4 require approved budgets, selection and reporting/payment controls. Section 9 cautions that advisory-board participation is not control. These May 2026 terms are not proven incorporated in 21415 or 22841.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-crf-approval-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes current budget, report and payment conditions",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
            "date": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Departmental report includes a rounded CAD 1 million TAT agreement among signed agreements. Exact signature date and bank receipt absent. Rounded announcement/report figures are not additional allocations on top of disclosure totals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-execution-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported signing an initial TCAP funding agreement in 2019–20",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "date": "Reporting period 2019–20; original publication date unestablished, current page modified 9 April 2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Next Steps says US funding for TAT was in process. Awarding agency, exact stage, amount, conditions, execution and payment are unspecified. The NSC engagement statement does not identify the NSC as funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-canada-us-funding-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a US funding process linked to Christchurch commitments",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023",
            "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Candidate typed relations — reuse existing actors and award nodes",
            "text": "| Public Safety Canada → agreement 22841 / two workstreams | Official announced purpose, 3 May 2023; S2 recipient entry | Corroborates already-mapped award and intended deliverables; no duplicate amount or new award. |",
            "matched": [
              "Public Safety Canada"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4612805f7210c9d19e66e906a0cc2d40e7dcbe09e841bd818fa36e909ce9f6dc"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Candidate typed relations — reuse existing actors and award nodes",
            "text": "| Public Safety Canada → agreement 21415 / original TCAP funding | Government-reported signed agreement during FY2019–20; S3 subsection | Adds source ancestry supporting reported execution; exact amount and identity stay with disclosure. No cash state. |",
            "matched": [
              "Public Safety Canada"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5b0f19cda2f519943abb3eff29c7609ddad9ddcf939aeccc8b7e21ab3e305f62"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
            "heading": "The new evidence",
            "text": "All three identify Public Safety Canada and (CRF) Community Resilience Fund . Full substantive record fields were read, including expected outcomes. Those expected outcomes concern identifying emerging issues and research/programming gaps, applying relevant initiatives, best practices and partner preparedness; they are not measurable project-specific milestone schedules or proof of outcomes delivered.",
            "matched": [
              "Public Safety Canada"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "411ddf969ec0cba9c031283f83f01925c9a982bc42399bf682ad30967d844631"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
            "heading": "Source ancestry and finite frontier",
            "text": "Forest implication: the useful path is now Public Safety Canada→identified contribution→named foundation→specified TCAP workstreams. This does not prove Canada→QuantSpark consultancy payment, classification command, individual removal or Australian deployment. Those would require their own allocation/implementation records. The most discriminating next record is the executed 21415 amendment or 22841 agreement with its approved budget and payment/milestone annex, then a corresponding acceptance/payment record. Public Safety Canada's CRF grants/contributions administrators and the recipient hold them. No request or follow-up branch was initiated.",
            "matched": [
              "Public Safety Canada"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0b0112b0118cf57ec9e2f0d5257bb9871d085989b544e859c333014fce4fb6a4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
      "label": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Named departmental centre in the 2023 status account, coordinating TAT engagement and hosting the launch event. This does not itself identify the grant acceptance official.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority unit"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-canada-centre",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
        "name": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
        "role": "Public authority unit",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Named departmental centre in the 2023 status account, coordinating TAT engagement and hosting the launch event. This does not itself identify the grant acceptance official.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named departmental centre in the 2023 status account, coordinating TAT engagement and hosting the launch event. This does not itself identify the grant acceptance official."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Canada Centre within Public Safety Canada is identified in a departmental status account as coordinating engagement with Tech Against Terrorism and hosting the event where TCAP 2.0 was jointly launched. Its role combines programme relationships, convening and support for smaller social-media platforms.",
        "structuralRole": "Government coordinating and convening unit supporting TAT engagement",
        "significance": "The Centre links a public sponsor to a technical initiative through concrete engagement and a launch event. This adds an implementation relationship beyond a funding announcement, while leaving contractual acceptance and payment with the separate officials and records responsible for them.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The 2023 status account",
            "text": "The document dated 5 October 2023 reports coordination with the US National Security Council on engagement with Tech Against Terrorism and describes a US funding process as under way. It does not identify the awarding agency, amount or a completed award. The same account records the joint TCAP 2.0 launch at the Centre's 1–5 May 2023 event. A completed launch and an on-track status are meaningful delivery evidence, but do not establish acceptance of a grant milestone or authorisation of an instalment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-centre-nsc-coordination",
              "w26-ver-e-centre-tat-engagement",
              "w26-ver-e-centre-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Background column reports Canada Centre work with the US NSC on TAT support for small social-media platforms. Meeting dates and operational instructions unknown; NSC is not identified as the funding agency.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-centre-nsc-coordination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "US National Security Council",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "coordinated engagement with TAT according to Canada’s status account",
            "sourceName": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "US National Security Council",
            "date": "As-of date of internal status account; released 12 August 2024, not a current 2026 coordination status."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Departmental Next Steps column reports completed launch at the Canada Centre event of 1–5 May 2023. Broader On track status and launch are not grant acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-centre-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "hosted the event with the joint TCAP 2.0 launch",
            "sourceName": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023",
            "date": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named intermediary and engagement purpose are explicit in the Canadian record; no classification mandate or joint legal entity is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-centre-tat-engagement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "engaged TAT on support for smaller platforms",
            "sourceName": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Finding that changes the map",
            "text": "A publicly released departmental status document records Canada partnering with Tech Against Terrorism to formally launch TCAP 2.0 at the Canada Centre's event of 1–5 May 2023. This earns a dated government participation/delivery relation. It does not establish acceptance of either grant workstream, completion of Phase 2, a contractual milestone, or authorization/payment of a particular instalment.",
            "matched": [
              "Canada Centre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d7f5c08d43c722889f45fa8e9fdfd56a838948b9e025345f6a87752b0a86e297"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Finding that changes the map",
            "text": "The same October 2023 document records Canada Centre–US National Security Council coordination on engagement with TAT , and reports a US funding process for TAT linked to Christchurch commitments . These are substantive governmental coordination and resource-mobilization relations, alongside the launch. The acquired Canadian record supplies the attribution; it does not identify a completed US award, paying agency, amount, conditions or payment.",
            "matched": [
              "Canada Centre"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5da5b0664ff15df33ca06cf825469f1653580347fce8055867e058f5dcd34349"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-us-nsc",
      "label": "US National Security Council",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Canadian departmental account reports coordination with the Canada Centre on engagement with TAT as of October 2023. No US award or classification authority assigned to this body.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-us-nsc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-us-nsc",
        "name": "US National Security Council",
        "role": "Public authority",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Canadian departmental account reports coordination with the Canada Centre on engagement with TAT as of October 2023. No US award or classification authority assigned to this body.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Canadian departmental account reports coordination with the Canada Centre on engagement with TAT as of October 2023. No US award or classification authority assigned to this body."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Canadian departmental account reports coordination with the Canada Centre on engagement with TAT as of October 2023. No US award or classification authority assigned to this body.",
        "structuralRole": "Public authority",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Background column reports Canada Centre work with the US NSC on TAT support for small social-media platforms. Meeting dates and operational instructions unknown; NSC is not identified as the funding agency.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-centre-nsc-coordination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "coordinated engagement with TAT according to Canada’s status account",
            "sourceName": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "US National Security Council",
            "date": "As-of date of internal status account; released 12 August 2024, not a current 2026 coordination status."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "Finding that changes the map",
            "text": "The same October 2023 document records Canada Centre–US National Security Council coordination on engagement with TAT , and reports a US funding process for TAT linked to Christchurch commitments . These are substantive governmental coordination and resource-mobilization relations, alongside the launch. The acquired Canadian record supplies the attribution; it does not identify a completed US award, paying agency, amount, conditions or payment.",
            "matched": [
              "US National Security Council"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5da5b0664ff15df33ca06cf825469f1653580347fce8055867e058f5dcd34349"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "S1 — departmental record of coordinated engagement, launch and funding process",
            "text": "Institutional context, scoped to this 5 October 2023 internal status account: PDF2's Background column, Commitment 36 / Prevention, says the Canada Centre worked with the US National Security Council on engagement with TAT concerning support for small social-media platforms addressing terrorist exploitation. The visual column alignment has been checked. This reports coordination around a named intermediary, without documenting who drafted particular classifications or could order a platform decision. Its separate OECD bullet does not make OECD part of the TCAP award.",
            "matched": [
              "US National Security Council"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "78f8ddcbf6d708dc9e68a4b51510fcc2bcba5a1b7461a113a28d8f466b064acf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
      "label": "US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Canadian status account says US funding was in process; agency, amount, agreement, exact approval stage and payment are unknown. This is not an awarded grant or an NSC payment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported funding process"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-us-funding-process",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
        "name": "US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023",
        "role": "Reported funding process",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Canadian status account says US funding was in process; agency, amount, agreement, exact approval stage and payment are unknown. This is not an awarded grant or an NSC payment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Canadian status account says US funding was in process; agency, amount, agreement, exact approval stage and payment are unknown. This is not an awarded grant or an NSC payment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Canadian status account says US funding was in process; agency, amount, agreement, exact approval stage and payment are unknown. This is not an awarded grant or an NSC payment.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported funding process",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Next Steps says US funding for TAT was in process. Awarding agency, exact stage, amount, conditions, execution and payment are unspecified. The NSC engagement statement does not identify the NSC as funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-canada-us-funding-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a US funding process linked to Christchurch commitments",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023",
            "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Canadian department’s October 2023 account of a process, not proof of a completed US award or receipt. No amount is supplied or inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-us-process-beneficiary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "identified TAT as intended funding recipient",
            "sourceName": "US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-ca21415",
      "label": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Original CAD 1,155,622.44; amended total CAD 1,256,688.09. Both name QuantSpark Foundation; totals are not additive. Signed instrument/payment absent; one-day start-date discrepancy retained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-ca21415",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-ca21415",
        "name": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
        "role": "Funding instrument",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Original CAD 1,155,622.44; amended total CAD 1,256,688.09. Both name QuantSpark Foundation; totals are not additive. Signed instrument/payment absent; one-day start-date discrepancy retained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Original CAD 1,155,622.44; amended total CAD 1,256,688.09. Both name QuantSpark Foundation; totals are not additive. Signed instrument/payment absent; one-day start-date discrepancy retained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Agreement 21415 is the Canadian contribution supporting the initial Terrorist Content Analytics Platform work, naming QuantSpark Foundation as recipient. The foundation's separate UK company history connects that former name to Online Harms Foundation. The original and amended disclosures describe one agreement, not two grants.",
        "structuralRole": "Identified public funding instrument for initial TCAP development",
        "significance": "The agreement supplies a precise route from Public Safety Canada to a named legal recipient and project. It also demonstrates why amendment handling matters: summing original and revised totals would exaggerate available resources, while treating a disclosed agreement value as cash received would overstate delivery evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Original value, amendment and date discrepancy",
            "text": "The original disclosure gives CAD1,155,622.44 and a period of 26 February 2020–30 September 2021. A 22 November 2021 amendment raises the total to CAD1,256,688.09 and extends the end to 31 March 2022, while displaying a start one day earlier. The derived increase is CAD101,065.65, not another award. A departmental account reports an initial agreement signed during 2019/20, but the signed instrument, exact execution date, amendment terms and bank receipts were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-original-value",
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-amended-value",
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-recipient",
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-execution-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
              "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Amended total CAD 1,256,688.09 replaces the earlier total; derived increase CAD 101,065.65 is not another award. Displayed start is 25 February 2020, one day earlier than original; end 31 March 2022. No signed amendment or payment acquired. Financial details: value: 1,256,688.09; currency: CAD; kind: revised total not additive to original not payment; period: agreement 21415 after 22 November 2021 amendment",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-amended-value"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed an increased total for the same contribution",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "date": "2021-11-22 – 2021-11-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Original public record states CAD 1,155,622.44 for agreement 21415. Its period is 26 February 2020–30 September 2021. This is an agreement-value disclosure, not a payment. Financial details: value: 1,155,622.44; currency: CAD; kind: original contribution total superseded not payment; period: displayed period 26 February 2020–30 September 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-original-value"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed the original contribution total",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Canadian record names QuantSpark Foundation; UK company history supplies the separate crosswalk to OHF company 11656320. The amendment the old label after the UK name change. Not an award to QuantSpark Limited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names the foundation under its former legal name",
            "sourceName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Departmental report includes a rounded CAD 1 million TAT agreement among signed agreements. Exact signature date and bank receipt absent. Rounded announcement/report figures are not additional allocations on top of disclosure totals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca21415-execution-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported signing an initial TCAP funding agreement in 2019–20",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP contribution — agreement 21415",
            "date": "Reporting period 2019–20; original publication date unestablished, current page modified 9 April 2025."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-ca22841",
      "label": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "CAD 1,945,904 disclosed contribution to OHF for archive/classification and moderation-workflow workstreams; stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026. No project acceptance or disbursement acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-ca22841",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-ca22841",
        "name": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
        "role": "Funding instrument",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "CAD 1,945,904 disclosed contribution to OHF for archive/classification and moderation-workflow workstreams; stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026. No project acceptance or disbursement acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAD 1,945,904 disclosed contribution to OHF for archive/classification and moderation-workflow workstreams; stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026. No project acceptance or disbursement acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CAD 1,945,904 disclosed contribution to OHF for archive/classification and moderation-workflow workstreams; stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026. No project acceptance or disbursement acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Government disclosure and 3 May announcement corroborate CAD 1,945,904 for OHF. Two records concern one award. Term 1 April 2023–31 March 2026 is not evidence of completed delivery or cash paid. Financial details: value: 1,945,904; currency: CAD; kind: contribution agreement value not disbursement; period: stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-value"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
                "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed and announced the Phase 2 contribution",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "date": "Official announcement anchor; exact signature date not stated."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Two publicly described workstreams identify intended outputs. No cost annex allocates the contribution specifically to Altitude, the LLM, an API or a supplier invoice; no accepted milestone acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies archive/classification and moderation-workflow development",
            "sourceName": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Public record identifies Online Harms Foundation; no Canadian company number appears, so company 11656320 crosswalk remains a separately sourced identity conclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-ca22841-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
                "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names OHF as the legal recipient",
            "sourceName": "Canada TCAP Phase 2 — agreement 22841",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          },
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-crf-terms",
      "label": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current May 2026 programme architecture: budget/report acceptance, conditional payments, possible IP licence and bounded redistribution approval. Not automatically the terms incorporated in historical TCAP agreements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding rules"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-crf-terms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-crf-terms",
        "name": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
        "role": "Funding rules",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current May 2026 programme architecture: budget/report acceptance, conditional payments, possible IP licence and bounded redistribution approval. Not automatically the terms incorporated in historical TCAP agreements.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current May 2026 programme architecture: budget/report acceptance, conditional payments, possible IP licence and bounded redistribution approval. Not automatically the terms incorporated in historical TCAP agreements."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current May 2026 programme architecture: budget/report acceptance, conditional payments, possible IP licence and bounded redistribution approval. Not automatically the terms incorporated in historical TCAP agreements.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding rules",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recipient copyright remains; a permanent nonexclusive royalty-free departmental licence may be given, not automatic ownership. Redistribution needs prior approval while recipients independently choose beneficiaries and are not government agents. No specific licence/redistribution exercise proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-crf-ip-and-selection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits the department’s stated IP and onward-funding rights",
            "sourceName": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
            "targetName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "date": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections 8,12–13,15.2 and 15.4 require approved budgets, selection and reporting/payment controls. Section 9 cautions that advisory-board participation is not control. These May 2026 terms are not proven incorporated in 21415 or 22841.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-crf-approval-rules"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
                "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes current budget, report and payment conditions",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Community Resilience Fund — current terms",
            "date": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
            "heading": "The new evidence",
            "text": "All three identify Public Safety Canada and (CRF) Community Resilience Fund . Full substantive record fields were read, including expected outcomes. Those expected outcomes concern identifying emerging issues and research/programming gaps, applying relevant initiatives, best practices and partner preparedness; they are not measurable project-specific milestone schedules or proof of outcomes delivered.",
            "matched": [
              "Community Resilience Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "411ddf969ec0cba9c031283f83f01925c9a982bc42399bf682ad30967d844631"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
      "label": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "UK5 notice SEP653567, pending with estimated 14 September signature and six-month term. Displayed GBP 192,000 ex VAT / 240,000 inc VAT remain unreconciled; no execution/payment inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed contract"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-uk-pilot",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
        "name": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
        "role": "Proposed contract",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "UK5 notice SEP653567, pending with estimated 14 September signature and six-month term. Displayed GBP 192,000 ex VAT / 240,000 inc VAT remain unreconciled; no execution/payment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "UK5 notice SEP653567, pending with estimated 14 September signature and six-month term. Displayed GBP 192,000 ex VAT / 240,000 inc VAT remain unreconciled; no execution/payment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UK5 notice SEP653567, pending with estimated 14 September signature and six-month term. Displayed GBP 192,000 ex VAT / 240,000 inc VAT remain unreconciled; no execution/payment inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed contract",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Notice gives discovery, analysis and bulk-referral scope; pending contract, estimated signature 14 September 2026 and term to 15 March 2027. GBP 192,000 ex VAT and 240,000 inc VAT are displayed without reconciliation. No executed agreement or payment. Financial details: value: 192,000; currency: GBP; kind: displayed pending contract value excluding VAT not payment; period: estimated 14 September 2026–15 March 2027",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-home-office-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
                "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Home Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a pending direct-award pilot notice",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The notice names TAT and a supplier PPON; the notice does not establish its company-number signatory or OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-pilot-tat-supplier"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
                "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names TAT as proposed supplier",
            "sourceName": "Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026",
            "targetName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "date": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
            "title": "UK procurement and policy: what can presently be joined"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
      "label": "UK voluntary infrastructure guidance — 2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Explicitly encourages TCAP and related measures where applicable while creating no legal obligation. Separate statutory/police duties are not automatically triggered by any TAT alert.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy guidance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
        "name": "UK voluntary infrastructure guidance — 2024",
        "role": "Policy guidance",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Explicitly encourages TCAP and related measures where applicable while creating no legal obligation. Separate statutory/police duties are not automatically triggered by any TAT alert.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Explicitly encourages TCAP and related measures where applicable while creating no legal obligation. Separate statutory/police duties are not automatically triggered by any TAT alert."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Explicitly encourages TCAP and related measures where applicable while creating no legal obligation. Separate statutory/police duties are not automatically triggered by any TAT alert.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy guidance",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Named-tool recommendation and legitimacy route, not mandatory subscription, exclusive provider choice or an individual takedown order.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-guide-tcap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends TCAP where applicable",
            "sourceName": "UK voluntary infrastructure guidance — 2024",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Guidance creates no legal obligation, while describing distinct existing legal duties and proportionate measures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-home-office-guide"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Home Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued voluntary provider guidance",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "UK voluntary infrastructure guidance — 2024",
            "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
            "title": "UK procurement and policy: what can presently be joined"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "label": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "GIFCT describes itself as a member-funded nonprofit. Company-led governance, admission conditions and shared-tool access are documented; primary incorporation/IRS identity and donor-specific commands were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "name": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "GIFCT describes itself as a member-funded nonprofit. Company-led governance, admission conditions and shared-tool access are documented; primary incorporation/IRS identity and donor-specific commands were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GIFCT describes itself as a member-funded nonprofit. Company-led governance, admission conditions and shared-tool access are documented; primary incorporation/IRS identity and donor-specific commands were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — institutional and financing self-description",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/explainers/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 12
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism describes itself as a member-funded nonprofit providing shared tools and coordination against terrorist and violent extremist activity online. Its company-led governance, membership conditions and hash-sharing database make it an important private infrastructure institution rather than a public regulator.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry-governed custodian of shared terrorism-related matching infrastructure",
        "significance": "GIFCT can influence which signals become available to participating companies through admission criteria, database inclusion rules and technology-access conditions. Members then apply their own policies. Its mention in Australia's industry standard gives it a route to public legitimacy without making its tools compulsory or every private classification a legal determination.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Membership, oversight and rights commitments",
            "text": "Mandatory tiered annual dues began in 2025; hash-database access additionally requires an information-sharing agreement. The organisation reports taking full management in 2022 and withdrawing five legacy nonmembers' accesses. Its Code provides warnings and technology or membership restrictions, with an organisational appeal route. GIFCT commissioned and paid for BSR's 2021 human-rights assessment while BSR retained editorial control. Later responses and a May 2026 policy update describe changes and continuing commitments; they do not establish that every proposed review measure or individual remedy has been completed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-dis-example-gifct",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-funds-tat",
              "w26-ver-e-board-governs",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-dues",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access-withdrawal",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-contributes",
              "w26-ver-e-code-sanctions",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-hria-commission",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-response",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-policy-update",
              "w26-ver-e-map-transition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current criteria include reports/appeals, transparency and rights commitments; HSDB access requires information-sharing agreement. Integrated or integrating does not mean all named members are operational. No private agreement content was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conditions shared-tool access on membership and agreement",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Mandatory dues began in 2025; current criteria require annual tiered contributions. The report’s combined member/external total is not attributed wholly to any named company, and no per-member payment amount is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-dues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must pay tiered annual membership dues",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": "Mandatory dues reported from 2025; current membership page observed September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July 2021 response says membership criteria/appeals had been revised while other human-review, external review, research and governance work remained longer-term or exploratory. Do not treat every promise as completed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "responded with completed changes and further commitments",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "date": "2021-07-20 – 2021-07-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public Code allows warnings/corrections and temporary/permanent technology or membership restrictions after consultation. Detailed acceptable-use examples are omitted; no specific sanction exercise established here.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-code-sanctions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Tech Solutions Code — 2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets leadership and Board consultation procedures for sanctions",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Tech Solutions Code — 2022",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-dis-example-gifct"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
            "sourceName": "DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "MAP’s 2025 launch and five 2025 BSR company reviews are separate from the May 2026 announced service transition. Its completed handover date and five-year assessment report were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-map-transition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Membership Advisory Program",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced transfer of BSR-delivered rights services into MAP",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Membership Advisory Program",
            "date": "2026-05-18 – 2026-05-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Updated policy assigns assessment, action, tracking and communication activities. Annex measures/risk register are commitments, not observed measurements or user remedy outcomes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-policy-update"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT human-rights policy — May 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "updated its public human-rights policy in May 2026",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT human-rights policy — May 2026",
            "date": "Policy states May 2026 update; exact day unknown despite older URL path."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current official governance account gives the Operating Board strategic guidance/oversight; no specific content decision or meeting vote is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-board-governs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides strategic oversight",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — institutional and financing self-description",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/explainers/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
            "title": "Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy"
          },
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
            "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "label": "GIFCT Operating Board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current governance body supplies strategic oversight; Meta chairs in 2026. Founding-company and elected at-large roles are distinct; roster does not prove item-level intervention.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governing body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
        "name": "GIFCT Operating Board",
        "role": "Governing body",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current governance body supplies strategic oversight; Meta chairs in 2026. Founding-company and elected at-large roles are distinct; roster does not prove item-level intervention.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current governance body supplies strategic oversight; Meta chairs in 2026. Founding-company and elected at-large roles are distinct; roster does not prove item-level intervention."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The GIFCT Operating Board is the forum's strategic governance body, combining founding-company and elected at-large roles. The public governance page identifies Meta as chair for 2026. The board's remit concerns organisational direction and oversight, rather than an established vote on every hash or platform action.",
        "structuralRole": "Strategic oversight and organisational-sanction review body for GIFCT",
        "significance": "The board is where company-led governance can shape priorities, access policy and the organisation's response to disputes. Its relationship with an independent advisory committee offers another input channel. The distinction between advice, formal board authority and individual content decisions prevents a chair title from being mistaken for unilateral classification control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Advice and a bounded appeal process",
            "text": "The advisory structure has a civil-society majority, a government and intergovernmental minority and a nongovernmental chair. Current-linked draft terms contemplate board endorsement of appointments, responses to advice and summarised minute exchanges; adoption and particular exercises were not acquired. Under the published technology Code, an organisation can appeal sanctions within ten business days. The board then has thirty business days to affirm, change or reverse them, potentially consulting the advisory committee. This organisational process does not constitute an appeal remedy for a platform user.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-board-governs",
              "w26-ver-e-meta-chairs",
              "w26-ver-e-iac-advice",
              "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-appointments",
              "w26-ver-e-member-appeal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current governance page describes advisory remit, a civil-society majority, a government/intergovernmental minority and a nongovernmental chair. Advice is not a vote, database access or binding classification instruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-iac-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advises on priorities and performance",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organization has 10 business days after notice to appeal; Board has 30 business days to affirm, change or reverse, potentially consulting IAC. Final within that process; not a content author’s platform remedy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-member-appeal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may appeal organizational sanctions through the Code process",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft terms contemplate Board endorsement, formal responses to advice, reciprocal summarized minutes and a nonvoting IAC chair. Adoption and actual appointment/response decisions not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-appointments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes appointment endorsement and response duties in a draft",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current official governance account gives the Operating Board strategic guidance/oversight; no specific content decision or meeting vote is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-board-governs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides strategic oversight",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official page identifies the chair. Chair role alone does not prove a unilateral classification veto or direction to other members.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-meta-chairs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "chairs the Operating Board in 2026",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": "Stated calendar-year role; exact appointment/exercise dates not independently acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-iac",
      "label": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current body advises on priorities/performance. Current-linked terms remain labelled draft; advisory participation is not board voting, database access or a content veto.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advisory body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-iac",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-iac",
        "name": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
        "role": "Advisory body",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current body advises on priorities/performance. Current-linked terms remain labelled draft; advisory participation is not board voting, database access or a content veto.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current body advises on priorities/performance. Current-linked terms remain labelled draft; advisory participation is not board voting, database access or a content veto."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current body advises on priorities/performance. Current-linked terms remain labelled draft; advisory participation is not board voting, database access or a content veto.",
        "structuralRole": "Advisory body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current governance page describes advisory remit, a civil-society majority, a government/intergovernmental minority and a nongovernmental chair. Advice is not a vote, database access or binding classification instruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-iac-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advises on priorities and performance",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft terms provide GIFCT support/remuneration and disclosure/recusal rules with exceptions. This disclosed dependency is not proof of compromised judgment or an operative adopted charter.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes funded participation and conflict safeguards in a draft",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
      "label": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Published draft describes Board-endorsed appointments, nonvoting chair participation, support and formal responses. Signed/adopted status and exercised appointments/conflicts were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Draft governance instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
        "name": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
        "role": "Draft governance instrument",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Published draft describes Board-endorsed appointments, nonvoting chair participation, support and formal responses. Signed/adopted status and exercised appointments/conflicts were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published draft describes Board-endorsed appointments, nonvoting chair participation, support and formal responses. Signed/adopted status and exercised appointments/conflicts were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published draft describes Board-endorsed appointments, nonvoting chair participation, support and formal responses. Signed/adopted status and exercised appointments/conflicts were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Draft governance instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft terms contemplate Board endorsement, formal responses to advice, reciprocal summarized minutes and a nonvoting IAC chair. Adoption and actual appointment/response decisions not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-appointments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes appointment endorsement and response duties in a draft",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Draft terms provide GIFCT support/remuneration and disclosure/recusal rules with exceptions. This disclosed dependency is not proof of compromised judgment or an operative adopted charter.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes funded participation and conflict safeguards in a draft",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT IAC terms — current-linked draft",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Independent Advisory Committee",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "label": "GIFCT member technology companies",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Membership requires substantive criteria and tiered annual dues. Shared-database access additionally requires the information-sharing agreement; integrated or integrating is not proof of all operational use.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Participant class"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "name": "GIFCT member technology companies",
        "role": "Participant class",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Membership requires substantive criteria and tiered annual dues. Shared-database access additionally requires the information-sharing agreement; integrated or integrating is not proof of all operational use.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Membership requires substantive criteria and tiered annual dues. Shared-database access additionally requires the information-sharing agreement; integrated or integrating is not proof of all operational use."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GIFCT member technology companies are the organisations admitted under the forum's criteria and responsible for annual tiered dues. They can contribute qualifying hashes and feedback, while access to the shared database requires an additional information-sharing agreement. Membership alone does not show a completed technical integration.",
        "structuralRole": "Paying participants that both supply shared signals and decide local platform responses",
        "significance": "Members are simultaneously resources, information sources and downstream decision-makers. That combination can make a shared system effective across platforms, but creates several separate accountability questions: who submitted a label, who admitted it, who received it and who acted. A membership list answers only part of that chain.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Conditions, discretion and organisational remedies",
            "text": "The published criteria include reporting and appeals processes, transparency and rights commitments. Mandatory dues began in 2025, without a disclosed per-member payment allocation in the retained aggregate. GIFCT says platforms retain their moderation decisions. The Code's sanction process allows a member ten business days to appeal and gives the Operating Board thirty business days to affirm, change or reverse the decision. That is a remedy for a participating organisation facing sanctions, not a content author's appeal against a platform removal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-dues",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access",
              "w26-ver-e-members-contribute",
              "w26-ver-e-hsdb-provider-discretion",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-reported-corrections",
              "w26-ver-e-member-appeal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current criteria include reports/appeals, transparency and rights commitments; HSDB access requires information-sharing agreement. Integrated or integrating does not mean all named members are operational. No private agreement content was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conditions shared-tool access on membership and agreement",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Mandatory dues began in 2025; current criteria require annual tiered contributions. The report’s combined member/external total is not attributed wholly to any named company, and no per-member payment amount is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-dues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must pay tiered annual membership dues",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": "Mandatory dues reported from 2025; current membership page observed September 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Organization has 10 business days after notice to appeal; Board has 30 business days to affirm, change or reverse, potentially consulting IAC. Final within that process; not a content author’s platform remedy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-member-appeal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may appeal organizational sanctions through the Code process",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Operating Board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Cryptographic/perceptual signals assist identification. GIFCT says it does not dictate enforcement; actual provider configuration, review and outcome need separate records.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hsdb-provider-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies matching information while platforms retain decisions",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "targetName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Member-supplied signals and feedback are documented; GIFCT also can create hashes. Admission under taxonomy is distinct from a platform moderation verdict.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-members-contribute"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contribute qualified hashes and labels",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2022 account describes review/sample corrections and a separate nonviolent music-video removal. Another member sees contributor withdrawal at its next access. Nonrandom feedback does not establish a database-wide error rate; no recipient processing or restoration proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-reported-corrections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported correcting labels and removing hashes",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": "Dated 2022/2025 report accounts, not a verified universal correction service-level agreement."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Qualified hashes/labels supplied by members and GIFCT; recipient platforms retain moderation decisions. Reported corrections and withdrawal visibility do not establish downstream restoration.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical system"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "name": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
        "role": "Technical system",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Qualified hashes/labels supplied by members and GIFCT; recipient platforms retain moderation decisions. Reported corrections and withdrawal visibility do not establish downstream restoration.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Qualified hashes/labels supplied by members and GIFCT; recipient platforms retain moderation decisions. Reported corrections and withdrawal visibility do not establish downstream restoration."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database is a shared collection of content fingerprints and associated labels used to help participating services identify qualifying terrorist and violent extremist material. Members contribute signals, and GIFCT can also create hashes. Access and inclusion are governed separately from a platform's own enforcement decisions.",
        "structuralRole": "Restricted reference database distributing matching signals across participating platforms",
        "significance": "Shared fingerprints let one organisation's classification assist detection elsewhere, creating a multiplier for both useful identification and any mistakes. Inclusion rules and correction handling are therefore substantive governance mechanisms. A match gives a recipient information; the recipient's policy and implementation determine whether content is restricted or restored.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Admission filters and withdrawal visibility",
            "text": "The published taxonomy describes separate designation, qualifying-incident and behavioural routes. TCAP-sourced inputs must also satisfy GIFCT's parameters rather than entering automatically. GIFCT's transparency accounts report label corrections, hash removals and a nonviolent music-video removal. A contributor withdrawal becomes visible to another member at its next access, but that does not demonstrate the recipient processed it or revisited an earlier action. The correction examples are not a random database sample and cannot yield a database-wide error rate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access-withdrawal",
              "w26-ver-e-members-contribute",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-contributes",
              "w26-ver-e-taxonomy-controls",
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-gifct-filter",
              "w26-ver-e-hsdb-provider-discretion",
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-reported-corrections",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-gifct-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "UN list, qualifying incident and behavioral routes have separate predicates. Behavioral classification needs more than an ideological label. December 2022 terminology remains dated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-taxonomy-controls"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT HSDB taxonomy — December 2022 v1.0",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defines qualified inclusion routes",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT HSDB taxonomy — December 2022 v1.0",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Cryptographic/perceptual signals assist identification. GIFCT says it does not dictate enforcement; actual provider configuration, review and outcome need separate records.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hsdb-provider-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies matching information while platforms retain decisions",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "targetName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Member-supplied signals and feedback are documented; GIFCT also can create hashes. Admission under taxonomy is distinct from a platform moderation verdict.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-members-contribute"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contribute qualified hashes and labels",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "README requires obtaining GIFCT credentials. No exact GIFCT adapter payload or actual deployment was inspected; do not inherit TCAP payload semantics.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-gifct-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is a separately credentialed source described by Altitude",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Taxonomy names TCAP but requires GIFCT inclusion parameters too. This filter defeats an inference that every TCAP label automatically enters HSDB.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tcap-gifct-filter"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies URL-hash inputs subject to GIFCT’s own parameters",
            "sourceName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Annual report describes GIFCT hash creation as well as member contributions; no item-specific instance asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-contributes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can create qualifying hashes itself",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2022 account describes review/sample corrections and a separate nonviolent music-video removal. Another member sees contributor withdrawal at its next access. Nonrandom feedback does not establish a database-wide error rate; no recipient processing or restoration proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-reported-corrections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported correcting labels and removing hashes",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT member technology companies",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": "Dated 2022/2025 report accounts, not a verified universal correction service-level agreement."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2022 report says GIFCT took full management and rescinded access from five legacy nonmembers that did not pursue membership. Historical organizational access change, not current membership count or content removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-access-withdrawal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported taking management and withdrawing five legacy accesses",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": "2022 report period; individual withdrawal dates unspecified."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-taxonomy",
      "label": "GIFCT HSDB taxonomy — December 2022 v1.0",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Distinct legal-list, qualifying incident and behavioral admission routes; TCAP URL hashes must also satisfy GIFCT parameters. Not automatic import of every upstream label.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Classification policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-taxonomy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-taxonomy",
        "name": "GIFCT HSDB taxonomy — December 2022 v1.0",
        "role": "Classification policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Distinct legal-list, qualifying incident and behavioral admission routes; TCAP URL hashes must also satisfy GIFCT parameters. Not automatic import of every upstream label.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Distinct legal-list, qualifying incident and behavioral admission routes; TCAP URL hashes must also satisfy GIFCT parameters. Not automatic import of every upstream label."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Distinct legal-list, qualifying incident and behavioral admission routes; TCAP URL hashes must also satisfy GIFCT parameters. Not automatic import of every upstream label.",
        "structuralRole": "Classification policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "UN list, qualifying incident and behavioral routes have separate predicates. Behavioral classification needs more than an ideological label. December 2022 terminology remains dated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-taxonomy-controls"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defines qualified inclusion routes",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT HSDB taxonomy — December 2022 v1.0",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Hash-Sharing Database",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-code",
      "label": "GIFCT Tech Solutions Code — 2022",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Leadership/Board process can restrict organizational technology access or membership. Organization appeal differs from platform-user content appeal; exercise not proved here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Access governance policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-code",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-code",
        "name": "GIFCT Tech Solutions Code — 2022",
        "role": "Access governance policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Leadership/Board process can restrict organizational technology access or membership. Organization appeal differs from platform-user content appeal; exercise not proved here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Leadership/Board process can restrict organizational technology access or membership. Organization appeal differs from platform-user content appeal; exercise not proved here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Leadership/Board process can restrict organizational technology access or membership. Organization appeal differs from platform-user content appeal; exercise not proved here.",
        "structuralRole": "Access governance policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public Code allows warnings/corrections and temporary/permanent technology or membership restrictions after consultation. Detailed acceptable-use examples are omitted; no specific sanction exercise established here.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-code-sanctions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets leadership and Board consultation procedures for sanctions",
            "sourceName": "GIFCT Tech Solutions Code — 2022",
            "targetName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
      "label": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GIFCT funded the assessment while BSR editorial control. Scoped future organizational risk/recommendations, not an audit of every member outcome; original PDF absent after 403.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Commissioned assessment"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-hria",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
        "name": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
        "role": "Commissioned assessment",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "GIFCT funded the assessment while BSR editorial control. Scoped future organizational risk/recommendations, not an audit of every member outcome; original PDF absent after 403.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GIFCT funded the assessment while BSR editorial control. Scoped future organizational risk/recommendations, not an audit of every member outcome; original PDF absent after 403."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GIFCT funded the assessment while BSR editorial control. Scoped future organizational risk/recommendations, not an audit of every member outcome; original PDF absent after 403.",
        "structuralRole": "Commissioned assessment",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July 2021 response says membership criteria/appeals had been revised while other human-review, external review, research and governance work remained longer-term or exploratory. Do not treat every promise as completed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "responded with completed changes and further commitments",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "date": "2021-07-20 – 2021-07-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Scoped assessment emphasized future organizational risks and recommended appeals, holds, external review and downstream transparency. It is not a current incident finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-bsr-assessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BSR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conducted the assessment with editorial control",
            "sourceName": "BSR",
            "targetName": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "date": "2021 assessment; no original after the recorded 403."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "BSR editorial control. No amount or contract terms acquired; paid assessment is not a demonstration of assessor direction or a completed audit of member outcomes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-hria-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
                "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "commissioned and paid for the human-rights assessment",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021",
            "date": "Assessment work December 2020–May 2021; exact payment date unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
            "title": "Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-hr-policy",
      "label": "GIFCT human-rights policy — May 2026",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Assessment/action/tracking/reporting commitments and responsibility matrix; not completed measurements or an individual remedy record.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-hr-policy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-hr-policy",
        "name": "GIFCT human-rights policy — May 2026",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Assessment/action/tracking/reporting commitments and responsibility matrix; not completed measurements or an individual remedy record.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Assessment/action/tracking/reporting commitments and responsibility matrix; not completed measurements or an individual remedy record."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Assessment/action/tracking/reporting commitments and responsibility matrix; not completed measurements or an individual remedy record.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Updated policy assigns assessment, action, tracking and communication activities. Annex measures/risk register are commitments, not observed measurements or user remedy outcomes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-gifct-policy-update"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "updated its public human-rights policy in May 2026",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT human-rights policy — May 2026",
            "date": "Policy states May 2026 update; exact day unknown despite older URL path."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
            "title": "Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-gifct-map",
      "label": "GIFCT Membership Advisory Program",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "MAP launch in 2025 is reported; transition of previously BSR-delivered human-rights services into MAP was announced in May 2026, without a verified completion date.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-gifct-map",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-gifct-map",
        "name": "GIFCT Membership Advisory Program",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "MAP launch in 2025 is reported; transition of previously BSR-delivered human-rights services into MAP was announced in May 2026, without a verified completion date.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "MAP launch in 2025 is reported; transition of previously BSR-delivered human-rights services into MAP was announced in May 2026, without a verified completion date."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "MAP launch in 2025 is reported; transition of previously BSR-delivered human-rights services into MAP was announced in May 2026, without a verified completion date.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "MAP’s 2025 launch and five 2025 BSR company reviews are separate from the May 2026 announced service transition. Its completed handover date and five-year assessment report were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-map-transition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
                "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced transfer of BSR-delivered rights services into MAP",
            "sourceName": "Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism",
            "targetName": "GIFCT Membership Advisory Program",
            "date": "2026-05-18 – 2026-05-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
            "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
            "title": "Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
      "label": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "TAT reports building a reusable media archive and advertises platform/researcher access. Current download/reuse licence and detailed access criteria were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical system"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tcap-archive",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
        "name": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
        "role": "Technical system",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "TAT reports building a reusable media archive and advertises platform/researcher access. Current download/reuse licence and detailed access criteria were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TAT reports building a reusable media archive and advertises platform/researcher access. Current download/reuse licence and detailed access criteria were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
            "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The TCAP Archive and Research Portal is Tech Against Terrorism's advertised repository and access service for collected media and related reference information. It is aimed at platforms and researchers, with content fingerprints also available through separately authenticated interfaces. Media access and hash access are different entitlements.",
        "structuralRole": "Reference-media store supporting research, classification and downstream matching",
        "significance": "An archive lets collected material become reusable infrastructure instead of a one-time alert. It can support human research, classification work and fingerprint distribution to multiple systems. The practical reach depends on admission, permitted reuse and update rules, rather than the size of an advertised collection alone.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported collection and access boundaries",
            "text": "The operator's 20 December 2024 account reports more than 46,000 files and 182,000 hashes, which are different units and should not be added. It attributes support for language-model identification and classification to Public Safety Canada without a cost allocation or acceptance record. Current pages advertise platform and researcher access and a referral route expanding the archive and hash lists. The retained record does not supply a substantive current download or onward-use licence, detailed admission criteria or a named admitted research organisation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
                "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-archive",
              "w26-ver-e-archive-research-access",
              "w26-ver-e-archive-hash-export",
              "w26-ver-e-tfp-archive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Product explanation describes media access, not a current download or onward-use licence. The endpoint represents the advertised audience; neither a named admitted organization nor an executed access agreement is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-archive-research-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
                "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Archive access applicants — platforms and researchers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advertises access for platforms and researchers",
            "sourceName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "targetName": "Archive access applicants — platforms and researchers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Current public documentation describes bulk fingerprints with classification/file metadata and updates. Media access, restricted database credentials and software licensing remain separate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-archive-hash-export"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies the content fingerprints described by the API",
            "sourceName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "targetName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Public product page identifies a contribution path. It does not say every submitted URL is included or disclose the exact admission/permissions matrix.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tfp-archive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advertises expansion of the archive and hash lists",
            "sourceName": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
            "targetName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "December 2024 operator account reports over 46,000 files and 182,000 hashes, distinct units. It attributes LLM identification/classification support to Public Safety Canada without a cost allocation or acceptance record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-archive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported building an archive and reusable hash interfaces",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "date": "2024-12-20 – 2024-12-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
            "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
      "label": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Onboarded users can receive fingerprints and incremental metadata/deletion updates. Published interface, not tested service; separate from Altitude’s older URL-alert importer.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical interface"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
        "name": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
        "role": "Technical interface",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Onboarded users can receive fingerprints and incremental metadata/deletion updates. Published interface, not tested service; separate from Altitude’s older URL-alert importer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Onboarded users can receive fingerprints and incremental metadata/deletion updates. Published interface, not tested service; separate from Altitude’s older URL-alert importer."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "TCAP's content-hash API is an authenticated interface for onboarded users to obtain content fingerprints with classification and file metadata. Its public documentation describes bulk retrieval, incremental updates and per-hash feedback, including fields that can communicate withdrawal from the reference collection.",
        "structuralRole": "Machine-readable distribution and correction channel for a restricted reference dataset",
        "significance": "The API is where a maintained reference collection becomes usable inside another organisation's systems. Update checkpoints and deletion indicators can transmit changed judgments, but the recipient must process them and decide what to do about prior actions. A technically available correction channel does not automatically restore content or accounts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Onboarding, withdrawal and feedback",
            "text": "Authentication documentation presupposes an existing onboarded TCAP or Archive account rather than offering unrestricted public access. Hash records include deleted and updated_on fields, with checkpointing to support recipient caches and guidance to monitor deprecated values. Authenticated users can report problems with individual hashes and retrieve their own analyst responses or decisions. Documentation examples are illustrative rather than actual case counts. This interface is distinct from the older URL-alert adapter inspected in Altitude, whose active/inactive field concerns URL availability rather than withdrawn classification.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-archive-hash-export",
              "w26-ver-e-api-onboarding",
              "w26-ver-e-api-feedback-route",
              "w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Hash records carry deleted and updated_on fields; checkpointing supports recipient caches and monitoring deprecated values is recommended. This interface can convey withdrawal, but recipient synchronization, erasure or reopening prior restrictions is unobserved. The documented output is withdrawal metadata for a recipient, not a command that restores an account or proof that a recipient applied it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Onboarded TCAP hash-list recipient",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents withdrawal metadata and incremental update handling",
            "sourceName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "targetName": "Onboarded TCAP hash-list recipient",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Current public documentation describes bulk fingerprints with classification/file metadata and updates. Media access, restricted database credentials and software licensing remain separate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-archive-hash-export"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies the content fingerprints described by the API",
            "sourceName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "targetName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Hash-list users may report individual-hash problems and retrieve their own analyst response/decision. Example counts, names and timestamps are illustrative, not actual cases or volume.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-api-feedback-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides authenticated per-hash error and inclusion feedback",
            "sourceName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "targetName": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Authentication introduction presupposes an existing onboarded TCAP or Archive account. It does not publish the current decision-maker, full eligibility contract or unrestricted access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-api-onboarding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires prior onboarding for authenticated API use",
            "sourceName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "targetName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
      "label": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Authenticated users can report individual-hash errors and read their own analyst decisions. Three-to-five-working-day reply is an aim; examples are illustrative, not actual cases.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Review mechanism"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
        "name": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
        "role": "Review mechanism",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Authenticated users can report individual-hash errors and read their own analyst decisions. Three-to-five-working-day reply is an aim; examples are illustrative, not actual cases.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authenticated users can report individual-hash errors and read their own analyst decisions. Three-to-five-working-day reply is an aim; examples are illustrative, not actual cases."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Authenticated users can report individual-hash errors and read their own analyst decisions. Three-to-five-working-day reply is an aim; examples are illustrative, not actual cases.",
        "structuralRole": "Review mechanism",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Analyst decisions include removal, non-removal and pending. Reply aim is three to five working days by onboarding email; no actual deadline performance or independent appeal procedure established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes analyst review and an email-response aim",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Hash-list users may report individual-hash problems and retrieve their own analyst response/decision. Example counts, names and timestamps are illustrative, not actual cases or volume.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-api-feedback-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides authenticated per-hash error and inclusion feedback",
            "sourceName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "targetName": "TCAP per-hash feedback and analyst response",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
      "label": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Advertised permission-controlled partner submissions, analyst/AI vetting, metadata referrals and archive expansion. No DSA appointment, live partner configuration or automatic removal authority inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical system"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
        "name": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
        "role": "Technical system",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Advertised permission-controlled partner submissions, analyst/AI vetting, metadata referrals and archive expansion. No DSA appointment, live partner configuration or automatic removal authority inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advertised permission-controlled partner submissions, analyst/AI vetting, metadata referrals and archive expansion. No DSA appointment, live partner configuration or automatic removal authority inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Advertised permission-controlled partner submissions, analyst/AI vetting, metadata referrals and archive expansion. No DSA appointment, live partner configuration or automatic removal authority inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical system",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "TAT describes categorized partner URL submissions with analyst/AI review and metadata for platform requests. Five-tier/125-plus-platform claims are advertised capabilities, not proof of universal integration or mandatory takedown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tfp-referrals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advertises vetted partner referrals into the alerting workflow",
            "sourceName": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Public product page identifies a contribution path. It does not say every submitted URL is included or disclose the exact admission/permissions matrix.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tfp-archive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advertises expansion of the archive and hash lists",
            "sourceName": "TAT Trusted Flagger Platform",
            "targetName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "label": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "TAT announced stewardship with Jigsaw collaboration; code pinned to 8 August 2024 commit. Trust-based prioritisation, configurable inputs and optional diagnostics are static findings, not deployed outcomes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Software"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-altitude",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "name": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
        "role": "Software",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "TAT announced stewardship with Jigsaw collaboration; code pinned to 8 August 2024 commit. Trust-based prioritisation, configurable inputs and optional diagnostics are static findings, not deployed outcomes.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TAT announced stewardship with Jigsaw collaboration; code pinned to 8 August 2024 commit. Trust-based prioritisation, configurable inputs and optional diagnostics are static findings, not deployed outcomes."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 10
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Altitude is an open-source moderation-workflow tool developed with Google Jigsaw collaboration and placed under announced Tech Against Terrorism stewardship in July 2024. The examined public implementation is pinned to 8 August 2024 and combines source signals, prioritisation, human review and delivery of review verdicts.",
        "structuralRole": "Workflow software connecting outside signals to an operator's review and response systems",
        "significance": "Altitude shows how a reference source can gain practical influence through queue priority and reviewer presentation without issuing a direct removal command. Its operator supplies credentials, configures sources and implements responses. The software layer, restricted source databases and actual enforcement system therefore remain distinct points of control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the inspected implementation does",
            "text": "The TCAP adapter imports URL-alert metadata. A confidence heuristic treats TCAP as trusted, but a separate severity component also affects priority; neither value is a calibrated probability or verdict. Reviewed decisions are scheduled for publication and sent to a configured receiver, or written to a local log when no receiver exists. Optional diagnostics can return decision information. These are static findings from the pinned source, not observed customer behaviour. Apache 2.0 software rights do not grant access to TCAP or GIFCT credentials.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-google-altitude",
              "w26-ver-e-tat-altitude-stewardship",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-software-rights",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-gifct-input",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-trust-priority",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-operator-choices",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-review-delivery",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-optional-feedback",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-redaction-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Generic importer can call source-specific redaction on DELETE; the method implementation was not read. Inspected TCAP adapter yields UPDATE_OR_INSERT and its ACT/INA means URL availability, not withdrawn classification. Different interfaces/versions preclude treating this as failure of the current hash-deletion API.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-redaction-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contains a generic source-redaction hook but no demonstrated restoration chain",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Export requires diagnostics active and maps BLOCK to REMOVE. Selection uses the latest review in the interval without the inspected condition requiring published state or successful downstream delivery. This is code semantics, not observed false reporting or TCAP acceptance of a disagreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-optional-feedback"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can return optional URL and decision diagnostics",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Draft review publication is scheduled after 60 seconds; draft cancellation is allowed, published deletion is not available through that endpoint. Configured receiver gets a verdict; without it a local log is written. Either branch can produce internal ACCEPTED, not demonstrated live removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-review-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "schedules reviewed verdict publication and conditional delivery",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pinned licence permits reproduction/modification/distribution subject to conditions and warranty limits. Contribution instructions separately require CLA/review; final approvers/permissions were not acquired. Software permission grants no restricted source-database access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-software-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits software adaptation subject to Apache 2.0 conditions",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "date": "Inspected commit date, not customer deployment or contract date."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pinned code assigns confidence component 3 for TCAP or other qualifying evidence. Separate severity contributes to priority, so TCAP alone does not guarantee top overall rank. Neither confidence nor queue rank is a moderation verdict or calibrated probability.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-trust-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "treats TCAP as trusted in its confidence heuristic",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Integrator supplies authentication and source credentials. New connections default active with diagnostics inactive after credential pre-check. These static defaults do not identify any customer’s actual consent, roles or source access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-operator-choices"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "configures access, source connections and moderation choices",
            "sourceName": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2024 adapter imports source identifier/report date, group text, flags, URL and availability. This is the older URL-alert interface; it is not evidence of current content-hash deletion handling or ignored corrections.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies URL-alert metadata in the inspected adapter",
            "sourceName": "Terrorist Content Analytics Platform",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July announcement assigns prospective stewardship to TAT with Jigsaw advisory support. Repository namespace and last observed main commit do not prove present operational vetoes or that no other development exists.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-altitude-stewardship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced it would lead maintenance and development",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure",
            "heading": "What changes, and what remains unjoined",
            "text": "These accounts create a time-ordered delivery trail that fits the disclosed archive/classification/workflow workstreams. That fit is an inference, not a contractual allocation: no acquired budget annex shows which of Altitude, the LLM, the archive or an API was paid from agreement22841. There is no need to invent one fully integrated product to explain the record. A shared archive can supply signals to multiple systems; a workflow tool can mediate provider decisions; government support can fund development while particular data and enforcement decisions remain private. The public product and Canadian lanes must resolve their own parts.",
            "matched": [
              "Altitude"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "84bbacb0976b73a343ffffef767f62c7624e46978a5edc920bb23e690017bf3b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          },
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
            "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
      "label": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Integrator supplies source credentials/authentication and determines how reviewed verdicts affect its own service. No named deployment or actual settings acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operator role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-altitude-operator",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
        "name": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
        "role": "Operator role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Integrator supplies source credentials/authentication and determines how reviewed verdicts affect its own service. No named deployment or actual settings acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Integrator supplies source credentials/authentication and determines how reviewed verdicts affect its own service. No named deployment or actual settings acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Integrator supplies source credentials/authentication and determines how reviewed verdicts affect its own service. No named deployment or actual settings acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Operator role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pinned licence permits reproduction/modification/distribution subject to conditions and warranty limits. Contribution instructions separately require CLA/review; final approvers/permissions were not acquired. Software permission grants no restricted source-database access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-software-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits software adaptation subject to Apache 2.0 conditions",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "date": "Inspected commit date, not customer deployment or contract date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Integrator supplies authentication and source credentials. New connections default active with diagnostics inactive after credential pre-check. These static defaults do not identify any customer’s actual consent, roles or source access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-operator-choices"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "configures access, source connections and moderation choices",
            "sourceName": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "targetName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The platform decides what a delivered verdict does. Appending a later review is statically possible, but no user appeal, executed takedown, restoration or recipient acceptance test was observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-receiver-responsibility"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires the platform’s implementation to give verdicts effect",
            "sourceName": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "targetName": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
      "label": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Inspected code publishes reviewed decisions to a configured receiver or writes a local log. Internal ACCEPTED is not proof of live removal; later action requires the platform’s implementation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Implementation mechanism"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
        "name": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
        "role": "Implementation mechanism",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Inspected code publishes reviewed decisions to a configured receiver or writes a local log. Internal ACCEPTED is not proof of live removal; later action requires the platform’s implementation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Inspected code publishes reviewed decisions to a configured receiver or writes a local log. Internal ACCEPTED is not proof of live removal; later action requires the platform’s implementation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the delivery step in the inspected Altitude implementation that publishes a reviewed decision to a configured platform receiver, or writes a local log if no receiver exists. It separates the workflow tool's internal verdict state from whatever action a platform actually implements.",
        "structuralRole": "Software handoff between a reviewed verdict and a platform-owned consequence",
        "significance": "The handoff is the point where a moderation recommendation could become an external restriction. Reading it prevents an internal success label from being mistaken for a takedown. It also exposes the separate requirements for correction: a later review must reach a recipient capable of revisiting the earlier action.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A successful internal path can end at a log",
            "text": "At the pinned 8 August 2024 version, draft review publication is scheduled after sixty seconds. Draft cancellation is allowed, while the examined endpoint does not delete a published review. A configured receiver receives a verdict; without one, the system writes locally. Either branch can produce internal ACCEPTED status. Appending a later review is statically possible, but the evidence does not demonstrate a user appeal, live takedown, restoration or receiver acceptance test. A generic importer redaction hook is not a verified end-to-end restoration chain.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-review-delivery",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-receiver-responsibility",
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-redaction-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Generic importer can call source-specific redaction on DELETE; the method implementation was not read. Inspected TCAP adapter yields UPDATE_OR_INSERT and its ACT/INA means URL availability, not withdrawn classification. Different interfaces/versions preclude treating this as failure of the current hash-deletion API.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-redaction-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contains a generic source-redaction hook but no demonstrated restoration chain",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Draft review publication is scheduled after 60 seconds; draft cancellation is allowed, published deletion is not available through that endpoint. Configured receiver gets a verdict; without it a local log is written. Either branch can produce internal ACCEPTED, not demonstrated live removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-review-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "schedules reviewed verdict publication and conditional delivery",
            "sourceName": "Altitude — inspected public implementation",
            "targetName": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The platform decides what a delivered verdict does. Appending a later review is statically possible, but no user appeal, executed takedown, restoration or recipient acceptance test was observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-altitude-receiver-responsibility"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires the platform’s implementation to give verdicts effect",
            "sourceName": "Altitude verdict delivery and local-log fallback",
            "targetName": "Platform operating Altitude — deployment role",
            "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
            "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
      "label": "TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Departmental account records joint TAT launch at Canada Centre event 1–5 May 2023. Launch participation does not establish grant milestone acceptance or completed Phase 2.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
        "name": "TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023",
        "role": "Reported event",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Departmental account records joint TAT launch at Canada Centre event 1–5 May 2023. Launch participation does not establish grant milestone acceptance or completed Phase 2.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Departmental account records joint TAT launch at Canada Centre event 1–5 May 2023. Launch participation does not establish grant milestone acceptance or completed Phase 2."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Departmental account records joint TAT launch at Canada Centre event 1–5 May 2023. Launch participation does not establish grant milestone acceptance or completed Phase 2.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Departmental Next Steps column reports completed launch at the Canada Centre event of 1–5 May 2023. Broader On track status and launch are not grant acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-centre-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "hosted the event with the joint TCAP 2.0 launch",
            "sourceName": "Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023",
            "date": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The same departmental record identifies TAT as launch partner. No actual project-performance acceptance or instalment payment is established by the event.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-tat-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
                "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "partnered in the Canadian launch",
            "sourceName": "Tech Against Terrorism",
            "targetName": "TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023",
            "date": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-archive-audience",
      "label": "Archive access applicants — platforms and researchers",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Advertised audience for Archive access. This role does not establish an admitted organization, a download licence or actual access by an Altitude deployment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Access role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-archive-audience",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-archive-audience",
        "name": "Archive access applicants — platforms and researchers",
        "role": "Access role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Advertised audience for Archive access. This role does not establish an admitted organization, a download licence or actual access by an Altitude deployment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advertised audience for Archive access. This role does not establish an admitted organization, a download licence or actual access by an Altitude deployment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
            "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Advertised audience for Archive access. This role does not establish an admitted organization, a download licence or actual access by an Altitude deployment.",
        "structuralRole": "Access role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Product explanation describes media access, not a current download or onward-use licence. The endpoint represents the advertised audience; neither a named admitted organization nor an executed access agreement is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-archive-research-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
                "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
                "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advertises access for platforms and researchers",
            "sourceName": "TCAP Archive and Research Portal",
            "targetName": "Archive access applicants — platforms and researchers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
            "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-hash-recipient",
      "label": "Onboarded TCAP hash-list recipient",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Authenticated recipient role in current public API documentation; may maintain a checkpointed local cache. No actual customer, synchronization result or account restoration is identified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Recipient role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w26-ver-hash-recipient",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-hash-recipient",
        "name": "Onboarded TCAP hash-list recipient",
        "role": "Recipient role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Authenticated recipient role in current public API documentation; may maintain a checkpointed local cache. No actual customer, synchronization result or account restoration is identified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authenticated recipient role in current public API documentation; may maintain a checkpointed local cache. No actual customer, synchronization result or account restoration is identified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "private-verification",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Authenticated recipient role in current public API documentation; may maintain a checkpointed local cache. No actual customer, synchronization result or account restoration is identified.",
        "structuralRole": "Recipient role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Hash records carry deleted and updated_on fields; checkpointing supports recipient caches and monitoring deprecated values is recommended. This interface can convey withdrawal, but recipient synchronization, erasure or reopening prior restrictions is unobserved. The documented output is withdrawal metadata for a recipient, not a command that restores an account or proof that a recipient applied it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents withdrawal metadata and incremental update handling",
            "sourceName": "TCAP content-hash API — current public docs",
            "targetName": "Onboarded TCAP hash-list recipient",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
            "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-call",
      "label": "Christchurch Call",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Voluntary multi-sector Call. Community programme direction is distinct from Foundation corporate powers and domestic law.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-call",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-call",
        "name": "Christchurch Call",
        "role": "Campaign",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Voluntary multi-sector Call. Community programme direction is distinct from Foundation corporate powers and domestic law.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Voluntary multi-sector Call. Community programme direction is distinct from Foundation corporate powers and domestic law."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
          },
          {
            "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Voluntary multi-sector Call. Community programme direction is distinct from Foundation corporate powers and domestic law.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Legacy undated process follows introduction, written intent, cleared applicant response and confidential community discussion. Secretariat convenes; a community participant is not automatically a veto-holder. Current operation and appeal rule unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-call-entry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "make the final entry decision in the published joining process",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OIA actuals are MFAT-only NZD expenditure through 29 February 2024, not Foundation capitalization or complete multi-party programme costs. Fiscal rows retain their distinct periods.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-mfat-costs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed department-only historic expenditure",
            "sourceName": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call",
            "date": "2024-04-04 – 2024-04-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint May 2024 launch multi-sector Leaders direction; current priorities repeats community direction. Exact electorate, voting rule and actual decisions not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-leaders-direction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "were described as retaining programme direction",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call",
            "date": "Announcement anchor; not expiry or complete current procedure."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing",
            "heading": "Custody, source scopes and finite search",
            "text": "Thirteen bounded queries covered the NZ/France handoff, official disclosures and the parent-supplied later grant leads: site:beehive.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" funding ; site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" funding ; site:elysee.fr \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" ; site:diplomatie.gouv.fr \"Christchurch\" \"fondation\" financement ; site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"transition\" funding Foundation ; site:dpmc.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" Foundation ; site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"Foundation\" \"OIA\" ; site:beehive.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"million\" 2024 ; \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" (transfer OR assets OR secondment OR funding) site:mfat.govt.nz ; \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" site:treasury.govt.nz ; \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" \"France\" \"funding\" government ; site:carnegie.org \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" \"2026\" ; site:search.open.canada.ca \"26007\" \"Christchurch\" .",
            "matched": [
              "Christchurch Call"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "493a15619ce2f970e8a09abe47d94d81cd1ce221e073bbad2a41f012d858ff16"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service",
            "heading": "Paid depth of support, separate identity",
            "text": "This is not Christchurch Call Foundation's Elevate. Different hosts and stated programmes establish distinct identities despite the shared name. The Canadian CCF contribution must not finance the Coalition's consulting service by name matching.",
            "matched": [
              "Christchurch Call"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d79935117e00679283183c639f2590df6d30b666029873c343fd4d9a993d00b1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
            "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
            "heading": "S1 — departmental record of coordinated engagement, launch and funding process",
            "text": "PDF4's Next Steps column, continuing the joint-launch paragraph from PDF3, reports that the US was in the process of granting funding to TAT and links that funding to advancing Christchurch Call commitments. It earns a Canadian-department-reported US funding process as of October 2023 , not an executed or paid US award. The passage does not name the US awarding agency, agreement, amount, exact application/approval stage, conditions or payment. The NSC engagement and US funding statements should remain separate relations; the latter does not identify the NSC as the funder.",
            "matched": [
              "Christchurch Call"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1096b511d4583a86977694a1c48629526eea2958b1f0544207737c8794114cf9"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
          },
          {
            "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          },
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-call-leaders",
      "label": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Published multi-sector direction/entry role; electorate, quorum, veto and exercised decisions remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-call-leaders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-call-leaders",
        "name": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Published multi-sector direction/entry role; electorate, quorum, veto and exercised decisions remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published multi-sector direction/entry role; electorate, quorum, veto and exercised decisions remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
          },
          {
            "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Published multi-sector direction/entry role; electorate, quorum, veto and exercised decisions remain not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Legacy undated process follows introduction, written intent, cleared applicant response and confidential community discussion. Secretariat convenes; a community participant is not automatically a veto-holder. Current operation and appeal rule unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-call-entry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "make the final entry decision in the published joining process",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Joint May 2024 launch multi-sector Leaders direction; current priorities repeats community direction. Exact electorate, voting rule and actual decisions not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-leaders-direction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "were described as retaining programme direction",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Leaders",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call",
            "date": "Announcement anchor; not expiry or complete current procedure."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
          },
          {
            "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          },
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named Canadian contribution recipient and independent support organization. Current roles and donor pages do not substitute for its not obtained governing deed or trustee appointment instruments.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-ccf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "name": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Named Canadian contribution recipient and independent support organization. Current roles and donor pages do not substitute for its not obtained governing deed or trustee appointment instruments.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named Canadian contribution recipient and independent support organization. Current roles and donor pages do not substitute for its not obtained governing deed or trustee appointment instruments."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
            "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — current institutional self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/the-foundation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Christchurch Call Foundation is the independent support organisation established to carry forward the Christchurch Call's work on terrorist and violent extremist content online. A joint New Zealand–France announcement set 1 July 2024 for the transition of support functions, subsequently reported by New Zealand's foreign ministry.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional bridge from an intergovernmental initiative to funded technical and policy programmes",
        "significance": "The Foundation brings government relationships, philanthropic support, advisory input and technical partners into one operating organisation. Its collaboration with ROOST gives policy expertise a route into reusable tools, while its Elevate programme links standards, benchmarks and support for smaller platforms. Funding for that work is distinct from authority over an adopter's content decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From support transition to reusable guidance",
            "text": "The 2023 proposal sought a separate legal capacity for broader fundraising, global hiring and secondments; its proposed governance split is not a substitute for the founding instruments. Later records identify philanthropic grants and a Canadian contribution naming The Christchurch Call Foundation as recipient. A ROOST partnership was announced in February 2025, before that Canadian award. The Foundation also contributed a terrorist-content policy pack to ROOST Model Community. The record does not identify a ROOST subaward or transfer of platform enforcement authority.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
              },
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
                "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-proposal-capacity",
              "w27-roost-e-secretariat-handoff",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-advice",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-funding",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-review",
              "w27-roost-e-packard-support",
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2024",
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2026",
              "w27-roost-e-pivotal-support",
              "w27-roost-e-canada-recipient",
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-programme",
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-roost",
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-template"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
              "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Donor database displays $500,000 over 12 months. Dollar currency unlabelled. Its spinout-in-2023 description differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; preparation versus operation remains a possible explanation, not a settled correction. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 12 months",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a launch grant dated 12 December 2024",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2024-12-12 – 2024-12-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "5 March 2026 trustee approval was announced 10 March: $2 million over 24 months. Approval is not payment or a donor-controlled policy seat; currency not explicitly annotated. Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: unknown; kind: approved grant; period: 24 months",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2026"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced trustee approval of a further grant",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2026-03-05 – 2026-03-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The 2023 proposal sought broader funding, global hiring and secondments outside government public-finance constraints. Board corporate/financial oversight and Leaders programme direction were proposed; founding appointment rights were left to founding documents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-proposal-capacity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed a separate legal capacity and oversight split",
            "sourceName": "Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "Summit proposal year, not Foundation incorporation or adoption date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Entry displays $350,000 and Term 36. Neither currency nor term unit is explicitly labelled in the card; no receipt or donor instruction right established. Financial details: value: 350,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-packard-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
                "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a 2024 general-support grant entry",
            "sourceName": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "README credits partner packs; CCF attribution and annex voice identify contribution beyond filename similarity. Four files include policy, two contextual annexes and evaluation. No funding ledger or authored-by-all-CCF claim.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-template"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contributed a TVEC policy pack to RMC",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "date": "Inspected repository commit, not first contribution date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The legal recipient is The Christchurch Call Foundation. A ROOST partnership purpose does not turn the whole award into a ROOST payment or identify a subaward.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-canada-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names CCF as recipient",
            "sourceName": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests consultation and reasons for rejected advice",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 10 supplies a review/feedback route without an express Foundation approval veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reviews and gives feedback on amended terms",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing",
            "heading": "Custody, source scopes and finite search",
            "text": "Thirteen bounded queries covered the NZ/France handoff, official disclosures and the parent-supplied later grant leads: site:beehive.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" funding ; site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" funding ; site:elysee.fr \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" ; site:diplomatie.gouv.fr \"Christchurch\" \"fondation\" financement ; site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"transition\" funding Foundation ; site:dpmc.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" Foundation ; site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"Foundation\" \"OIA\" ; site:beehive.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"million\" 2024 ; \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" (transfer OR assets OR secondment OR funding) site:mfat.govt.nz ; \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" site:treasury.govt.nz ; \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" \"France\" \"funding\" government ; site:carnegie.org \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" \"2026\" ; site:search.open.canada.ca \"26007\" \"Christchurch\" .",
            "matched": [
              "Christchurch Call Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "493a15619ce2f970e8a09abe47d94d81cd1ce221e073bbad2a41f012d858ff16"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service",
            "heading": "Paid depth of support, separate identity",
            "text": "This is not Christchurch Call Foundation's Elevate. Different hosts and stated programmes establish distinct identities despite the shared name. The Canadian CCF contribution must not finance the Coalition's consulting service by name matching.",
            "matched": [
              "Christchurch Call Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d79935117e00679283183c639f2590df6d30b666029873c343fd4d9a993d00b1"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
            "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — current institutional self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/the-foundation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          },
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
            "title": "CCF programme and delivery lane — Elevate"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-support-secretariat",
      "label": "Call support functions / secretariat",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Support function announced for transfer to the Foundation from 1 July 2024 and retrospectively reported transitioned; staff, assets and IP novation instruments absent.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institutional function"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-support-secretariat",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-support-secretariat",
        "name": "Call support functions / secretariat",
        "role": "Institutional function",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Support function announced for transfer to the Foundation from 1 July 2024 and retrospectively reported transitioned; staff, assets and IP novation instruments absent.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Support function announced for transfer to the Foundation from 1 July 2024 and retrospectively reported transitioned; staff, assets and IP novation instruments absent."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Support function announced for transfer to the Foundation from 1 July 2024 and retrospectively reported transitioned; staff, assets and IP novation instruments absent.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional function",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint statement said New Zealand taxpayer funding would end 30 June 2024; MFAT retrospectively reported transitioned support. This is not a finding about every later NZ-related grant or receipt.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-nz-support-end"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported the support transition and government-funding endpoint",
            "sourceName": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
            "targetName": "Call support functions / secretariat",
            "date": "2024-06-30 – 2024-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "14 May announcement gave 1 July 2024 for Foundation support functions; MFAT annual report confirms transition in its retrospective account. No staff, asset, IP or contract novation instrument acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-secretariat-handoff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was announced and retrospectively reported as transitioned",
            "sourceName": "Call support functions / secretariat",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2024-07-01 – 2024-07-01"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-proposal2023",
      "label": "Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Proposed independent legal capacity and split between financial/corporate oversight and Leaders work-programme direction. Not the adopted constitution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-proposal2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-proposal2023",
        "name": "Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal",
        "role": "Proposal",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Proposed independent legal capacity and split between financial/corporate oversight and Leaders work-programme direction. Not the adopted constitution.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposed independent legal capacity and split between financial/corporate oversight and Leaders work-programme direction. Not the adopted constitution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Proposed independent legal capacity and split between financial/corporate oversight and Leaders work-programme direction. Not the adopted constitution.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The 2023 proposal sought broader funding, global hiring and secondments outside government public-finance constraints. Board corporate/financial oversight and Leaders programme direction were proposed; founding appointment rights were left to founding documents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-proposal-capacity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed a separate legal capacity and oversight split",
            "sourceName": "Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "Summit proposal year, not Foundation incorporation or adoption date."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-ccan",
      "label": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Advisory network with its own published internal decision rules, funding relationship and member fundholder; advice is not a general Foundation veto.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-ccan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-ccan",
        "name": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Advisory network with its own published internal decision rules, funding relationship and member fundholder; advice is not a general Foundation veto.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advisory network with its own published internal decision rules, funding relationship and member fundholder; advice is not a general Foundation veto."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Christchurch Call Advisory Network provides advice around the Christchurch Call and its Foundation. Its published terms describe its own membership, internal decision process and operating-fund arrangements, making it a distinct organised advisory body within the wider initiative.",
        "structuralRole": "Structured advisory channel with internal governance and a funding relationship",
        "significance": "CCAN can organise and communicate advice from its participants, request consultation and seek reasons when advice is rejected. Its own voting rules determine collective positions. The terms do not turn that advisory relationship into a general veto over Foundation policy, so internal network authority and external influence need separate treatment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How the network governs itself",
            "text": "The terms labelled December 2025 provide a Core of up to 25 members and elected co-chairs. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation, with a two-thirds vote available under a deadline exception. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings. The terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organisation under an agreed memorandum. The acquired record does not identify that fundholder, the amount or an executed memorandum; it establishes the published arrangement rather than a verified transfer.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-core",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-advice",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-funding",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-custody",
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "December 2025-labelled terms set a Core of at most 25 and co-chair elections. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-core"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCAN Core Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "governs its own admissions, statements and internal decisions",
            "sourceName": "CCAN Core Committee",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": "Labelled last-update month, not independently verified adoption date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Unnamed member-organization role holds funds under an agreed memorandum. This is not proof of a particular bank transfer, signed contract or named intermediary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-custody"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is assigned operational fund custody in published terms",
            "sourceName": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-advice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests consultation and reasons for rejected advice",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section 10 supplies a review/feedback route without an express Foundation approval veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reviews and gives feedback on amended terms",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. Amount, identity of payer/fundholder and executed memorandum remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as providing advisory-network funding",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-ccan-core",
      "label": "CCAN Core Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "At most 25; admissions, internal decisions, co-chair election and fund-use rules under December 2025-labelled terms.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-ccan-core",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-ccan-core",
        "name": "CCAN Core Committee",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "At most 25; admissions, internal decisions, co-chair election and fund-use rules under December 2025-labelled terms.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "At most 25; admissions, internal decisions, co-chair election and fund-use rules under December 2025-labelled terms."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "At most 25; admissions, internal decisions, co-chair election and fund-use rules under December 2025-labelled terms.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "December 2025-labelled terms set a Core of at most 25 and co-chair elections. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-core"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "governs its own admissions, statements and internal decisions",
            "sourceName": "CCAN Core Committee",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": "Labelled last-update month, not independently verified adoption date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Core decisions constrain internal applications/use under the published terms. Exact memorandum, account signatories, expenditure and enforcement were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves funding applications and fund-use rules",
            "sourceName": "CCAN Core Committee",
            "targetName": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
      "label": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Terms describe operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. This role is not a named legal entity or proven signed instrument.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
        "name": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Terms describe operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. This role is not a named legal entity or proven signed instrument.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Terms describe operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. This role is not a named legal entity or proven signed instrument."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Terms describe operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. This role is not a named legal entity or proven signed instrument.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Core decisions constrain internal applications/use under the published terms. Exact memorandum, account signatories, expenditure and enforcement were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCAN Core Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves funding applications and fund-use rules",
            "sourceName": "CCAN Core Committee",
            "targetName": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Unnamed member-organization role holds funds under an agreed memorandum. This is not proof of a particular bank transfer, signed contract or named intermediary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccan-custody"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
                "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is assigned operational fund custody in published terms",
            "sourceName": "CCAN member fundholder — identity unacquired",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Advisory Network",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-mfat",
      "label": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Department reporting Call support transition and its own expenditure. MFAT costs are not the whole programme budget.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-mfat",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-mfat",
        "name": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Department reporting Call support transition and its own expenditure. MFAT costs are not the whole programme budget.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Department reporting Call support transition and its own expenditure. MFAT costs are not the whole programme budget."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade appears in the Christchurch Call record as the department reporting support-function transition and disclosing its own historical expenditure. Its records help distinguish government administration of the initiative from the Foundation's later independent operating arrangements.",
        "structuralRole": "Government custodian of transition and department-specific spending evidence",
        "significance": "The ministry supplies an official account of how support work moved to the Foundation and where a particular public-funding stream ended. Its spending disclosure gives a bounded resource history, but cannot stand in for all government, donor or Foundation expenditure associated with the Call.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Transition and expenditure scope",
            "text": "The joint New Zealand–France statement said New Zealand taxpayer funding would end on 30 June 2024 and announced the Foundation's support functions from 1 July. MFAT's annual report retrospectively reports the transition. Its 4 April 2024 information-release response covers MFAT-only New Zealand-dollar expenditure through 29 February 2024 across distinct fiscal periods. These are departmental actuals, not Foundation capitalisation or a complete programme budget, and they do not exclude every possible later New Zealand-related grant.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-nz-support-end",
              "w27-roost-e-mfat-costs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint statement said New Zealand taxpayer funding would end 30 June 2024; MFAT retrospectively reported transitioned support. This is not a finding about every later NZ-related grant or receipt.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-nz-support-end"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Call support functions / secretariat",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported the support transition and government-funding endpoint",
            "sourceName": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
            "targetName": "Call support functions / secretariat",
            "date": "2024-06-30 – 2024-06-30"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "OIA actuals are MFAT-only NZD expenditure through 29 February 2024, not Foundation capitalization or complete multi-party programme costs. Fiscal rows retain their distinct periods.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-mfat-costs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
                "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed department-only historic expenditure",
            "sourceName": "New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call",
            "date": "2024-04-04 – 2024-04-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-packard",
      "label": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Donor grant database publishes a 2024 CCF general-support entry; receipt and governing grant terms not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-packard",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-packard",
        "name": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Donor grant database publishes a 2024 CCF general-support entry; receipt and governing grant terms not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Donor grant database publishes a 2024 CCF general-support entry; receipt and governing grant terms not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
            "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Donor grant database publishes a 2024 CCF general-support entry; receipt and governing grant terms not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Entry displays $350,000 and Term 36. Neither currency nor term unit is explicitly labelled in the card; no receipt or donor instruction right established. Financial details: value: 350,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-packard-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
                "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a 2024 general-support grant entry",
            "sourceName": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Named among supporters over the years.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-packard"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
            "sourceName": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
            "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR funding update",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
      "label": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Grantmaking corporation in New York, distinct from the existing Carnegie UK node.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
        "name": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Grantmaking corporation in New York, distinct from the existing Carnegie UK node.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Grantmaking corporation in New York, distinct from the existing Carnegie UK node."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Carnegie Corporation of New York is a philanthropic grantmaker identified in the Christchurch Call Foundation's funding history. It is a separate institution from Carnegie UK. The retained donor records describe both a launch grant and a later trustee-approved grant for the Foundation.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropic resource source for the Foundation's independent operating capacity",
        "significance": "Grant support helps sustain the Foundation after support functions moved out of government. The award periods give a view of that resource runway. They do not identify donor control over policy, trustee appointments or particular platform decisions, and approval should remain distinct from money actually received.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two disclosed grant records",
            "text": "A donor database entry dated 12 December 2024 displays $500,000 over twelve months. A later announcement says trustees approved $2 million over twenty-four months on 5 March 2026, announced on 10 March. The acquired cards do not explicitly annotate the dollar currency. The older entry's description of a 2023 spinout differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; the record does not settle whether the dates describe preparation and operation respectively.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
              },
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2024",
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2026"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Donor database displays $500,000 over 12 months. Dollar currency unlabelled. Its spinout-in-2023 description differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; preparation versus operation remains a possible explanation, not a settled correction. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 12 months",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
                "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a launch grant dated 12 December 2024",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2024-12-12 – 2024-12-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "5 March 2026 trustee approval was announced 10 March: $2 million over 24 months. Approval is not payment or a donor-controlled policy seat; currency not explicitly annotated. Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: unknown; kind: approved grant; period: 24 months",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-carnegie2026"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
                "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced trustee approval of a further grant",
            "sourceName": "Carnegie Corporation of New York",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2026-03-05 – 2026-03-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-pivotal-leaders-fund",
      "label": "Pivotal Leaders Fund",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "CCF names support through this fund; legal payer, amount, terms and receipt are not established by the inspected page.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-pivotal-leaders-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-pivotal-leaders-fund",
        "name": "Pivotal Leaders Fund",
        "role": "Funding programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "CCF names support through this fund; legal payer, amount, terms and receipt are not established by the inspected page.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CCF names support through this fund; legal payer, amount, terms and receipt are not established by the inspected page."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CCF names support through this fund; legal payer, amount, terms and receipt are not established by the inspected page.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Current recipient page acknowledges support through Pivotal Leaders Fund. Amount, legal paying entity, restrictions and receipt not acquired; no equivalency or European intermediary instrument inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pivotal-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named by CCF as a support channel",
            "sourceName": "Pivotal Leaders Fund",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
            "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-canada26007",
      "label": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "CAD 1,369,064 disclosed contribution to CCF, 23 October 2025–31 March 2028, with three expected workstreams including a ROOST partnership. No ROOST subaward or acceptance record.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-canada26007",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-canada26007",
        "name": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
        "role": "Funding instrument",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "CAD 1,369,064 disclosed contribution to CCF, 23 October 2025–31 March 2028, with three expected workstreams including a ROOST partnership. No ROOST subaward or acceptance record.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CAD 1,369,064 disclosed contribution to CCF, 23 October 2025–31 March 2028, with three expected workstreams including a ROOST partnership. No ROOST subaward or acceptance record."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CAD 1,369,064 disclosed contribution to CCF, 23 October 2025–31 March 2028, with three expected workstreams including a ROOST partnership. No ROOST subaward or acceptance record.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Record 26007 displays CAD 1,369,064, term 23 October 2025–31 March 2028. Disclosure establishes awarded/agreement value, not disbursement or acceptance of all work. Financial details: value: 1,369,064; currency: CAD; kind: disclosed contribution value; period: 23 October 2025–31 March 2028",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-canada-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public Safety Canada",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "disclosed a contribution agreement value and expected results",
            "sourceName": "Public Safety Canada",
            "targetName": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "date": "2025-10-23 – 2028-03-31"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official expected results and CCF November account describe three workstreams. This is prospective scope, not government approval of particular classification rules or accepted code.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-canada-workstreams"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCF Elevate programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies expected new-sector, ROOST and community work",
            "sourceName": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "targetName": "CCF Elevate programme",
            "date": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The legal recipient is The Christchurch Call Foundation. A ROOST partnership purpose does not turn the whole award into a ROOST payment or identify a subaward.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-canada-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names CCF as recipient",
            "sourceName": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "targetName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "date": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
            "title": "CCF programme and delivery lane — Elevate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
      "label": "CCF Elevate programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "CCF programme associates the Canadian contribution with new-sector work, ROOST tools and community uptake. Distinct from Tech Coalition Elevate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
        "name": "CCF Elevate programme",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "CCF programme associates the Canadian contribution with new-sector work, ROOST tools and community uptake. Distinct from Tech Coalition Elevate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CCF programme associates the Canadian contribution with new-sector work, ROOST tools and community uptake. Distinct from Tech Coalition Elevate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CCF programme associates the Canadian contribution with new-sector work, ROOST tools and community uptake. Distinct from Tech Coalition Elevate.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official expected results and CCF November account describe three workstreams. This is prospective scope, not government approval of particular classification rules or accepted code.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-canada-workstreams"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies expected new-sector, ROOST and community work",
            "sourceName": "Canada–CCF contribution 26007",
            "targetName": "CCF Elevate programme",
            "date": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CCF programme connects contribution support, standards/benchmarks, ROOST tools and community uptake. Exact implementation/acceptance schedules absent; separate from the Coalition consulting service.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-programme"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
                "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes its Elevate programme",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "CCF Elevate programme",
            "date": "2025-11-12 – 2025-11-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
            "title": "CCF programme and delivery lane — Elevate"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Website legal entity and reported EIN 33-3305434; tax status self-reported. Open-tool organization with published repository governance; incorporation and donor reserved rights not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-roost",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-roost",
        "name": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Website legal entity and reported EIN 33-3305434; tax status self-reported. Open-tool organization with published repository governance; incorporation and donor reserved rights not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Website legal entity and reported EIN 33-3305434; tax status self-reported. Open-tool organization with published repository governance; incorporation and donor reserved rights not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
            "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
            "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — legal identity in website privacy statement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ROOST, or Robust Open Online Safety Tools, develops shared tools for online safety. The investigation records its institutional origins, published governing board, partnerships and repository governance.",
        "structuralRole": "Reusable safety tools and the people governing them",
        "significance": "ROOST matters because shared technical tools can make safety practices easier to adopt across platforms. Funding, board composition and repository-maintainer powers help explain who can shape those tools, while adopters still make deployment choices.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current team names individual members and affiliations. December 2025 inaugural-board announcement does not establish first existence because February launch already named a chair. Corporate reserved seats, donor vetoes, appointment/removal and budget rules remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-board-roost"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is the published governing board",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Board",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The current Marketing Manager posting says Global Impact employs US individuals on behalf of ROOST; position reports to ROOST COO. No filled role, universal staffing arrangement, fiscal sponsorship or grant ownership established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-employment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
                "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Impact — advertised ROOST employer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is the advertised US employer for a ROOST-linked vacancy",
            "sourceName": "Global Impact — advertised ROOST employer",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current Roles sets TDC direction; public roadmap and December 2025 explanation invite community feedback. Open/private/pseudonymous feedback is not a binding vote, maintainer permission or implemented feature.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-roadmap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has a published roadmap-direction role with feedback routes",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pinned README and current roadmap identify reusable resources. The 20 August 2026 inspected commit is a custody pin, not first release, adopter deployment or current runtime guarantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-roost-rmc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts an open model and policy integration project",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Repository host may replace for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct. Maintainers may appoint additional/replacement maintainers; exact current permission exercise not audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-host-maintainers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "initially appoints and may replace maintainers",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Open-source model permits independent forks subject to the relevant licence. Published project rules do not compel downstream operators to deploy an upstream change.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-fork-check"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes forking as a check on upstream project control",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Issuer launch on 10 February 2025 says more than $27m for four years; same-day president letter says $28m initial funding; 4 June says $28.5m funding and in-kind. No common valuation/cash schedule supports subtraction or summation; dollar currency unlabelled.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-fundraising-account"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST reported founding resources",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "published differing non-additive founding resource totals",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "ROOST reported founding resources",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CCF-authored authorized reprint displayed 10 February 2025, index 12 February, precedes the October Canadian award. Later award scope supports a partnership purpose but supplies no ROOST subaward, budget or deliverable approval agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-roost"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
                "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced a technical and information collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
            "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
            "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — legal identity in website privacy statement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
            "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
            "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
            "title": "CCF programme and delivery lane — Elevate"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-columbia-igp",
      "label": "Columbia SIPA Institute of Global Politics",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Institution reports ROOST incubation and prospective independent nonprofit operation; no university ownership or transfer agreement established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-columbia-igp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-columbia-igp",
        "name": "Columbia SIPA Institute of Global Politics",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Institution reports ROOST incubation and prospective independent nonprofit operation; no university ownership or transfer agreement established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Institution reports ROOST incubation and prospective independent nonprofit operation; no university ownership or transfer agreement established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
            "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Institution reports ROOST incubation and prospective independent nonprofit operation; no university ownership or transfer agreement established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Columbia describes incubation within IGP and prospective independent operation while collaborating. This is an institutional account, not an ownership, asset-transfer or reserved-rights instrument.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-columbia-incubation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
                "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported incubation and intended nonprofit independence",
            "sourceName": "Columbia SIPA Institute of Global Politics",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": "2025-02-19 – 2025-02-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
            "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-global-impact",
      "label": "Global Impact — advertised ROOST employer",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Current ROOST-linked vacancy says US individuals would be employed by Global Impact on behalf of ROOST. No filled-vacancy, fiscal-sponsor or grant-custody finding.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-global-impact",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-global-impact",
        "name": "Global Impact — advertised ROOST employer",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current ROOST-linked vacancy says US individuals would be employed by Global Impact on behalf of ROOST. No filled-vacancy, fiscal-sponsor or grant-custody finding.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current ROOST-linked vacancy says US individuals would be employed by Global Impact on behalf of ROOST. No filled-vacancy, fiscal-sponsor or grant-custody finding."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
            "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current ROOST-linked vacancy says US individuals would be employed by Global Impact on behalf of ROOST. No filled-vacancy, fiscal-sponsor or grant-custody finding.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The current Marketing Manager posting says Global Impact employs US individuals on behalf of ROOST; position reports to ROOST COO. No filled role, universal staffing arrangement, fiscal sponsorship or grant ownership established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-employment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
                "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is the advertised US employer for a ROOST-linked vacancy",
            "sourceName": "Global Impact — advertised ROOST employer",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding",
            "heading": "Candidate relations and next decisive record",
            "text": "The highest-yield missing instruments are the CCF–ROOST project agreement/budget and its acceptance schedule; ROOST's board constitution/budget delegations; donor contribution schedules separating money from donated resources; and the Global Impact service/fiscal arrangement. These would establish who can withhold resources, approve work or redirect it. Ordinary employer administration, charitable resource pooling and maintainers' independent technical judgment remain live alternative explanations to a donor-directed policy chain.",
            "matched": [
              "Global Impact"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c600a1f5f110e9784ca62a5276f62422e9703ac660cd1b5e9d6c344c67a473d0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding",
            "heading": "Acquisition frontier",
            "text": "Finite searches covered ROOST governance/legal identity, its exact EIN, technical committee, and targeted ROOST + Google/McGovern/Global Impact funding combinations. Several combined searches produced irrelevant results or none. They do not establish the absence of financial records. No original IRS determination, constitutional instrument, restricted grant agreement or partner-specific cash receipt was located in this bounded pass. An initial overlong search response was truncated before any results could be inspected; it is not evidence. Acquisition is closed for the combined forest assessment.",
            "matched": [
              "Global Impact"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "21fbd6aaf1512ba81eb40d9176b0e016ce164b5cb1fd1fa331dc8016970855d6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
            "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-roost-board",
      "label": "ROOST Board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current Roles policy assigns TDC appointment. Listed members are individuals with professional affiliations; no employer-reserved seats or donor veto established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-roost-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-roost-board",
        "name": "ROOST Board",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current Roles policy assigns TDC appointment. Listed members are individuals with professional affiliations; no employer-reserved seats or donor veto established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current Roles policy assigns TDC appointment. Listed members are individuals with professional affiliations; no employer-reserved seats or donor veto established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current Roles policy assigns TDC appointment. Listed members are individuals with professional affiliations; no employer-reserved seats or donor veto established.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current team names individual members and affiliations. December 2025 inaugural-board announcement does not establish first existence because February launch already named a chair. Corporate reserved seats, donor vetoes, appointment/removal and budget rules remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-board-roost"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is the published governing board",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Board",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current Roles policy expressly assigns appointment to the Board. It is an undated current rule, distinct from November 2025 initial recruitment by ROOST and future selection design.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-board-tdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appoints the Technical Design Committee",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Board",
            "targetName": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current team page lists Smith as co-chair; December 2025 announcement used Chair. This is a named individual office, not proof Discord appoints or controls that seat.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-clint-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Clint Smith",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed as a current co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Clint Smith",
            "targetName": "ROOST Board",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-tdc",
      "label": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current overarching technical/roadmap and tie-break role. November 2025 initial recruitment statement is a separate historical account.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-tdc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-tdc",
        "name": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current overarching technical/roadmap and tie-break role. November 2025 initial recruitment statement is a separate historical account.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current overarching technical/roadmap and tie-break role. November 2025 initial recruitment statement is a separate historical account."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current overarching technical/roadmap and tie-break role. November 2025 initial recruitment statement is a separate historical account.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current Roles sets TDC direction; public roadmap and December 2025 explanation invite community feedback. Open/private/pseudonymous feedback is not a binding vote, maintainer permission or implemented feature.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-roadmap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has a published roadmap-direction role with feedback routes",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "targetName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current TDC roadmap/technical role includes consultation and tie-breaking for maintainer teams. It does not require a deploying platform to adopt every update or classification policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tdc-direction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets overarching technical direction and resolves technical ties",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "targetName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current Roles policy expressly assigns appointment to the Board. It is an undated current rule, distinct from November 2025 initial recruitment by ROOST and future selection design.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-board-tdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appoints the Technical Design Committee",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Board",
            "targetName": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-maintainers",
      "label": "ROOST project maintainers",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Project development, releases and merge approvals under branch protections; repository authority is not downstream platform enforcement power.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-maintainers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-maintainers",
        "name": "ROOST project maintainers",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Project development, releases and merge approvals under branch protections; repository authority is not downstream platform enforcement power.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Project development, releases and merge approvals under branch protections; repository authority is not downstream platform enforcement power."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ROOST project maintainers are the people responsible under published project rules for development, releases and merge approval. They work within repository protections and the project's technical-governance structure. The role identifies control over a software project rather than control over every service deploying it.",
        "structuralRole": "Repository-level decision-makers for changes and releases",
        "significance": "Maintainers influence what reusable tools and guidance make it into official project versions. That can affect downstream choices, especially when many adopters follow upstream releases. Open licensing and the possibility of forks mean repository authority does not itself compel a platform to deploy a change or accept a content classification.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Appointment and technical authority",
            "text": "The repository host initially appoints maintainers and may replace them for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct; maintainers may appoint additional or replacement maintainers. ROOST's Technical Direction Committee sets overarching technical direction and resolves technical ties after consultation. Ordinary community membership carries no explicit permissions, and an employer is not automatically a contributor because an employee participates. The public rules explain the authority model, but the retained evidence does not audit each current permission or identify every approver of the Foundation's policy pack.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tdc-direction",
              "w27-roost-e-host-maintainers",
              "w27-roost-e-maintainer-projects",
              "w27-roost-e-community-proposals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current policy gives ordinary community membership no explicit permissions. Employer organizations are not automatically contributors; partner GitHub teams administer access, not necessarily policy votes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-community-proposals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST contributor / community role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may propose changes without membership-based permissions",
            "sourceName": "ROOST contributor / community role",
            "targetName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current TDC roadmap/technical role includes consultation and tie-breaking for maintainer teams. It does not require a deploying platform to adopt every update or classification policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tdc-direction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets overarching technical direction and resolves technical ties",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Technical Design Committee",
            "targetName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Repository host may replace for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct. Maintainers may appoint additional/replacement maintainers; exact current permission exercise not audited.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-host-maintainers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "initially appoints and may replace maintainers",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "General ROOST project roles assign releases, development and merge approval under branch protection. RMC is a hosted project; this does not identify each actual RMC approver or prove a specific policy merge decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-maintainer-projects"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "exercise project and merge authority under repository rules",
            "sourceName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "targetName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-community",
      "label": "ROOST contributor / community role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "May propose changes; ordinary membership carries no explicit permissions. Partner access teams and individual code contribution are distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-community",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-community",
        "name": "ROOST contributor / community role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "May propose changes; ordinary membership carries no explicit permissions. Partner access teams and individual code contribution are distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "May propose changes; ordinary membership carries no explicit permissions. Partner access teams and individual code contribution are distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "May propose changes; ordinary membership carries no explicit permissions. Partner access teams and individual code contribution are distinct.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current policy gives ordinary community membership no explicit permissions. Employer organizations are not automatically contributors; partner GitHub teams administer access, not necessarily policy votes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-community-proposals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may propose changes without membership-based permissions",
            "sourceName": "ROOST contributor / community role",
            "targetName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-resource-account",
      "label": "ROOST reported founding resources",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Issuer accounts report more than $27m, $28m and later $28.5m funding/in-kind. These are non-additive descriptions, not a reconciled cash balance or donor allocation schedule.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported finance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-resource-account",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-resource-account",
        "name": "ROOST reported founding resources",
        "role": "Reported finance",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Issuer accounts report more than $27m, $28m and later $28.5m funding/in-kind. These are non-additive descriptions, not a reconciled cash balance or donor allocation schedule.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Issuer accounts report more than $27m, $28m and later $28.5m funding/in-kind. These are non-additive descriptions, not a reconciled cash balance or donor allocation schedule."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Issuer accounts report more than $27m, $28m and later $28.5m funding/in-kind. These are non-additive descriptions, not a reconciled cash balance or donor allocation schedule.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported finance",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Issuer launch on 10 February 2025 says more than $27m for four years; same-day president letter says $28m initial funding; 4 June says $28.5m funding and in-kind. No common valuation/cash schedule supports subtraction or summation; dollar currency unlabelled.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-fundraising-account"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "published differing non-additive founding resource totals",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "ROOST reported founding resources",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "label": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Open policy/model integration resources at inspected commit 22b3bd4, dated 20 August 2026. Repository content is distinct from adopted platform policy or deployment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Repository"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-rmc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "name": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
        "role": "Repository",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Open policy/model integration resources at inspected commit 22b3bd4, dated 20 August 2026. Repository content is distinct from adopted platform policy or deployment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Open policy/model integration resources at inspected commit 22b3bd4, dated 20 August 2026. Repository content is distinct from adopted platform policy or deployment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ROOST Model Community is an open project collecting policy packs, integration guidance and resources for using safety models. The retained repository snapshot is commit 22b3bd4, dated 20 August 2026. Its materials include the Christchurch Call Foundation's terrorist-content policy pack and an investigation prototype example.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared publication and integration layer for policy and safety-model resources",
        "significance": "RMC makes institutional policy expertise and technical examples available for reuse in one place. That can reduce adoption effort and spread particular approaches. Maintainers govern the repository's content and releases, while adopting organisations still choose whether to use those materials and how to connect them to production decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Content rights and integration choices",
            "text": "The inspected root licence is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, allowing sharing and adaptation under its conditions. It is not a blanket licence to separately hosted models, service data or third-party content. The integration guide recommends separating detection, investigation, review and enforcement, comparing model outputs with local policy, and using human review for uncertain results. These are recommendations rather than enforced system properties. Repository history shows the Foundation pack present at the examined revision; that custody evidence does not establish a platform deployment or its policy version.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-maintainer-projects",
              "w27-roost-e-roost-rmc",
              "w27-roost-e-template-hosting",
              "w27-roost-e-licence-applies",
              "w27-roost-e-guide-discretion",
              "w27-roost-e-guide-phoebe"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Guide recommends detection/investigation/review/enforcement separation, comparison with existing policy and human review for uncertain cross-model results. Adopter chooses policy, model/hosting and integration; recommendation is not enforced architecture.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-guide-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes configurable model and human-review choices",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "May 27 relocation metadata says relocation without semantic changes; earlier-path query includes May 7. These are finite history results, not full authorship or adoption reconstruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-hosting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is present in the inspected repository",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pinned README and current roadmap identify reusable resources. The 20 August 2026 inspected commit is a custody pin, not first release, adopter deployment or current runtime guarantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-roost-rmc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts an open model and policy integration project",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Read root licence supports copying/adaptation subject to its terms. No separate platform contract or blanket licence to models, endpoint data or third-party content inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-licence-applies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes CC BY 4.0 as its root content licence",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "targetName": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
            "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Guide example supplies a discovery/architecture relation. It does not establish the same deployment, model, CCF policy or enforcement chain used by Discord or Bluesky.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-guide-phoebe"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "links Phoebe as an investigation example",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "targetName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "General ROOST project roles assign releases, development and merge approval under branch protection. RMC is a hosted project; this does not identify each actual RMC approver or prove a specific policy merge decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-maintainer-projects"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "status": "inferred",
            "label": "exercise project and merge authority under repository rules",
            "sourceName": "ROOST project maintainers",
            "targetName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
            "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "label": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "CCF-contributed policy, contextual annexes and finite evaluation in RMC. Contains removal/escalation guidance, contextual exceptions and an unresolved INCITE1 reference; not an executed classifier or legal mandate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy template"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "name": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
        "role": "Policy template",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "CCF-contributed policy, contextual annexes and finite evaluation in RMC. Contains removal/escalation guidance, contextual exceptions and an unresolved INCITE1 reference; not an executed classifier or legal mandate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CCF-contributed policy, contextual annexes and finite evaluation in RMC. Contains removal/escalation guidance, contextual exceptions and an unresolved INCITE1 reference; not an executed classifier or legal mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Christchurch Call Foundation's terrorist and violent extremist content policy pack is a set of reusable documents hosted in ROOST Model Community. It contains policy language, two contextual annexes and a finite evaluation, offering material an operator can adapt when designing a moderation policy.",
        "structuralRole": "Reusable policy specification connecting institutional expertise to model-guided moderation",
        "significance": "This is a tangible point where policy concepts can become machine-facing instructions. Its categories, exceptions and escalation language could shape a system if an operator adopts them. That makes the text itself worth examining, while preserving the separate question of which platform actually uses which revision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Categories, context and an imperfect test",
            "text": "The inspected pack describes eight invalid-content categories, credible-threat indicators, contextual exceptions, human review and possible law-enforcement escalation. An annex combines actor, content and behaviour and discusses weaknesses in designation lists. A 17 April 2026 evaluation used 170 team-labelled items and reported 90.5% recall and 100% precision for the binary task; recruitment detection reached 12 of 17, below its stated target. An undefined INCITE1 reference and tension around contextual exceptions remain. These are properties of the reusable specification and test, not observed platform removals.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-template",
              "w27-roost-e-template-hosting",
              "w27-roost-e-template-action",
              "w27-roost-e-template-context",
              "w27-roost-e-template-evaluation",
              "w27-roost-e-template-ambiguity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy labels eight invalid categories, normally requires two indicators for credible-threat TVEC2 and describes law-enforcement escalation plus contextual EDSA/human review. This is proposed policy text in a reusable pack, not an operating legal duty or observed removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-action"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers removal and escalation language for voluntary adaptation",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "INCITE1 is referenced but undefined in inspected policy line 104; EDSA exclusion and otherwise-TVEC permission/evaluation language need reconciliation before treating this as an executable consistent specification. Not evidence of actual over-removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-ambiguity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains an unresolved category reference and contextual tension",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "README credits partner packs; CCF attribution and annex voice identify contribution beyond filename similarity. Four files include policy, two contextual annexes and evaluation. No funding ledger or authored-by-all-CCF claim.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-ccf-template"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contributed a TVEC policy pack to RMC",
            "sourceName": "Christchurch Call Foundation",
            "targetName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "date": "Inspected repository commit, not first contribution date."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Annex 2 combines actor, content and behavior, discusses politicized/incomplete lists and uses selected incident context. Its examples are not legal designation findings or evidence that a named platform adopted those labels.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-context"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies contextual actor guidance with explicit limitations",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "May 27 relocation metadata says relocation without semantic changes; earlier-path query includes May 7. These are finite history results, not full authorship or adoption reconstruction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-hosting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
                "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is present in the inspected repository",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "170 team-labelled items yield TP114/FN12/FP0/TN44 and reported 90.5% recall/100% precision. Recruitment 12/17 fails the stated 85% target; EDSA exact-category precision is distinct from binary valid/invalid errors; TVEC4 11/13 rounds to 85%. No general precision guarantee or observed deployed model.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-evaluation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes a finite evaluation with mixed category results",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": "2026-04-17 – 2026-04-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-rmc-licence",
      "label": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Permission to share/adapt subject to attribution and other conditions; no endorsement, platform data access, mandatory updates or proof of adoption.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Licence"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-rmc-licence",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-rmc-licence",
        "name": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
        "role": "Licence",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Permission to share/adapt subject to attribution and other conditions; no endorsement, platform data access, mandatory updates or proof of adoption.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Permission to share/adapt subject to attribution and other conditions; no endorsement, platform data access, mandatory updates or proof of adoption."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Permission to share/adapt subject to attribution and other conditions; no endorsement, platform data access, mandatory updates or proof of adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Licence",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Licence requires applicable attribution/notices and identification of changes, disclaims endorsement, and provides termination/cure terms. It does not require adopters to accept CCF updates or give CCF final authority over local content.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-reuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits sharing and adaptation with attribution conditions",
            "sourceName": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Read root licence supports copying/adaptation subject to its terms. No separate platform contract or blanket licence to models, endpoint data or third-party content inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-licence-applies"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes CC BY 4.0 as its root content licence",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "targetName": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
            "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Chooses local policy, configuration, endpoint and response. This abstract role is not a discovered customer or a grant recipient.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "name": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Chooses local policy, configuration, endpoint and response. This abstract role is not a discovered customer or a grant recipient.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Chooses local policy, configuration, endpoint and response. This abstract role is not a discovered customer or a grant recipient."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 15
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The tool adopter or platform operator is the organisation that chooses and runs a safety tool in its own service. This abstract role separates the publisher of reusable software or policy guidance from the party configuring rules, connecting data and deciding what happens to users or content.",
        "structuralRole": "Local decision-maker translating reusable tools into platform action",
        "significance": "A policy pack, model or rules engine influences behaviour only through an adoption and integration decision. Following the operator exposes the missing links between upstream recommendations and downstream outcomes: chosen versions, local rules, credentials, review procedures and action receivers. Repository control alone cannot establish those decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Where practical authority sits",
            "text": "ROOST's integration guide describes choices about models, hosting, local policy and human review. Open licences permit modification subject to their terms, and published governance recognises forking as a check on upstream project control. These permissions do not supply platform credentials or restricted reference data. The Phoebe example likewise requires an operator's endpoints and repository configuration. Pathways support carries access and confidentiality conditions while expressly leaving implementation discretionary. A named deployment and its configuration would be needed to attribute a particular moderation action to this role.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
                "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-fork-check",
              "w27-roost-e-template-reuse",
              "w27-roost-e-template-action",
              "w27-roost-e-template-context",
              "w27-roost-e-template-evaluation",
              "w27-roost-e-template-ambiguity",
              "w27-roost-e-guide-discretion",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-config",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-ozone-boundary",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-licence",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-gate",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-information",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-site-ip",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-confidentiality",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Policy labels eight invalid categories, normally requires two indicators for credible-threat TVEC2 and describes law-enforcement escalation plus contextual EDSA/human review. This is proposed policy text in a reusable pack, not an operating legal duty or observed removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-action"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers removal and escalation language for voluntary adaptation",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current programme targets company employees handling user content/communications, excludes current member staff and vendors without that role, and reviews applicants. Coalition membership is neither required nor guaranteed. No registration or acceptance event observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-gate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers no-cost support after eligibility and registration review",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Guide recommends detection/investigation/review/enforcement separation, comparison with existing policy and human review for uncertain cross-model results. Adopter chooses policy, model/hosting and integration; recommendation is not enforced architecture.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-guide-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes configurable model and human-review choices",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "INCITE1 is referenced but undefined in inspected policy line 104; EDSA exclusion and otherwise-TVEC permission/evaluation language need reconciliation before treating this as an executable consistent specification. Not evidence of actual over-removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-ambiguity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains an unresolved category reference and contextual tension",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Licence requires applicable attribution/notices and identification of changes, disclaims endorsement, and provides termination/cure terms. It does not require adopters to accept CCF updates or give CCF final authority over local content.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-reuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits sharing and adaptation with attribution conditions",
            "sourceName": "RMC CC BY 4.0 licence",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms address information/feedback requests and reasonable efforts to respond to information requests within three months. The duties do not grant an right to a platform user database or amount to blanket assignment of feedback IP.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-information"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires accurate registration and information cooperation",
            "sourceName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Licence is personal, nonexclusive, nontransferable and internal/noncommercial within the stated site-material scope. It is not an assignment of participant inventions or universal permission to all linked third-party resources.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-site-ip"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "grants a limited revocable site licence and restricts copying",
            "sourceName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Annex 2 combines actor, content and behavior, discusses politicized/incomplete lists and uses selected incident context. Its examples are not legal designation findings or evidence that a named platform adopted those labels.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-template-context"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies contextual actor guidance with explicit limitations",
            "sourceName": "CCF TVEC policy pack",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
            "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
            "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "label": "Osprey",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Discord-origin open rules engine donated to ROOST; reported production use and platform-specific rules/effects are separate from the reusable CCF policy pack.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Software"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-osprey",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "name": "Osprey",
        "role": "Software",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Discord-origin open rules engine donated to ROOST; reported production use and platform-specific rules/effects are separate from the reusable CCF policy pack.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Discord-origin open rules engine donated to ROOST; reported production use and platform-specific rules/effects are separate from the reusable CCF policy pack."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Osprey is a rules engine developed at Discord and reported donated to ROOST in July 2025. It processes event information through configurable rules and custom functions. Discord and Bluesky have described production use, with platform-specific systems converting engine outputs into operational effects.",
        "structuralRole": "Reusable rules infrastructure between platform event streams and local response systems",
        "significance": "Osprey lowers the work required to build and change safety workflows, potentially spreading useful infrastructure across services. Its public code does not contain every adopter's policies: local functions, rule stores, permissions and output integrations determine behaviour. This distinction locates substantive moderation choices inside the adopting platform.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Production origins and downstream adaptation",
            "text": "Discord's engineering account reports roughly 400 million daily actions, 204 action types, 2,288 rules and 99 custom functions for December 2025; actions are not necessarily violations or removals. A later Bluesky case study describes platform events entering Osprey, Kafka carrying outputs and a Bluesky-owned receiver invoking Ozone actions. Analysts write local rules. Those participant accounts establish reported adoption and architecture, not independent telemetry or use of the Christchurch Call policy pack. Community improvements and Discord reintegration are likewise reported by participants.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-discord-donation",
              "w27-roost-e-roost-osprey",
              "w27-roost-e-discord-production",
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-planned",
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-production",
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Discord engineering reports roughly 400m daily actions, 204 action types, 2,288 rules and 99 custom UDFs as of December 2025. Actions are not necessarily violations/removals. Local ETCD rules, sinks, access/audit and unreleased functions preclude treating the public engine as the entire deployed policy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-discord-production"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported in production with local rules and controls",
            "sourceName": "Osprey",
            "targetName": "Discord",
            "date": "Reported system metrics period; articles February/March 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "February case study attributes over 45m events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily to Bluesky; neither is a unique-account count. Analysts own rules and custom functions. ROOST-published participant account, not independently tested telemetry or proof of CCF-template use.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-production"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bluesky",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was later reported using Osprey with locally authored rules",
            "sourceName": "Bluesky",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "July 2025 issuer announcement and Discord engineering account trace Osprey from Discord to open ROOST tooling. Donation is software/resource transfer as reported, not an copyright assignment or customer-data transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-discord-donation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported donating its production-origin rules engine",
            "sourceName": "Discord",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Case study describes atproto events into Osprey, custom functions, Kafka and a Bluesky-owned effects receiver calling Ozone. Engine outputs become actions through this separate operator implementation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to send results through Kafka to a local receiver",
            "sourceName": "Osprey",
            "targetName": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
            "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Community improvements and subsequent Discord reintegration are participant-reported. Exact release acceptance, intellectual-property assignment and production version were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-roost-osprey"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported maintaining and developing the donated engine",
            "sourceName": "ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Launch account described planned/forthcoming availability and use. Later production account does not turn this announcement into contemporaneous deployment proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-planned"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bluesky",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as planning adoption in July 2025",
            "sourceName": "Bluesky",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky",
            "heading": "Bluesky: implementation reaches a platform-owned action receiver",
            "text": "The described path is atproto event stream → Osprey with Bluesky-specific functions → Kafka output sink → effects receiver on Bluesky servers → action in Ozone . The account says analysts migrated and developed rules; its named example labels suspected t-shirt spammers. This identifies the platform's rule-writing and action integration, not ROOST approval of each decision. Setup still involved engineering, despite reduced dependence on engineers for subsequent rule changes.",
            "matched": [
              "Osprey"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d695bf741666990364094b2ee91d3e8e814f0af3afa82fd5a1a47935c3796ba5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky",
            "heading": "What enters the map",
            "text": "No acquired adopter account establishes use of the CCF TVEC prompt pack, mandatory ROOST policy, a Canadian-funded deployment, Lantern signal access or a specific law-enforcement referral. Osprey adoption is not evidence of adopting every ROOST-supported model or sample policy. The most useful next record would pair a named deployment's exact configuration/policy revision with its approval process and a documented action or correction. That question remains for the next forest assessment; this lane has not pursued it.",
            "matched": [
              "Osprey"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e7f65945ebbd33e6325386687a4ec4832b83163c7530ac07253f5261574ae40f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
            "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary",
            "heading": "Who can change what",
            "text": "The MIT licence permits modification and redistribution subject to retaining its notices and disclaimer. It provides software freedom, not access to an Osprey installation, a platform's content or separately licensed models. The source files can consequently be changed by a downstream operator, while the actual chosen version/configuration remains an evidentiary question. Entire21-line LICENSE read. No named actor's production permission or exercise of a right is inferred.",
            "matched": [
              "Osprey"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9964d1317ba0793d46fccaa1cca3ce35ab5947d7cbc6913356599bcf1b05a410"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-bluesky",
      "label": "Bluesky",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named operator in ROOST-published Osprey case study. Reported architecture/effects are not independently observed telemetry.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-bluesky",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-bluesky",
        "name": "Bluesky",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Named operator in ROOST-published Osprey case study. Reported architecture/effects are not independently observed telemetry.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named operator in ROOST-published Osprey case study. Reported architecture/effects are not independently observed telemetry."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Bluesky is a social platform described in a ROOST-published case study as using Osprey in production. Its engineers integrated the rules engine with the platform's event stream and response systems, while analysts developed rules and custom functions for operational safety work.",
        "structuralRole": "Named adopter retaining its own rules and action integration",
        "significance": "Bluesky supplies a concrete example of shared infrastructure reaching a platform-owned enforcement path. The case study locates rule authorship and the final action receiver at Bluesky, making the operator's decisions visible rather than attributing all effects to ROOST or another contributor to its projects.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From adoption announcement to reported operation",
            "text": "The July 2025 announcement described planned adoption. The 4 February 2026 case study later described atproto events flowing through Osprey, outputs sent through Kafka, and a Bluesky-owned effects receiver invoking Ozone. Its example labels suspected t-shirt spammers. The account reports over 45 million events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily; neither measure is a count of unique accounts. These are participant-reported figures, not independently observed telemetry, and the account does not establish use of the Christchurch Call Foundation's policy template.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-planned",
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-production",
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "February case study attributes over 45m events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily to Bluesky; neither is a unique-account count. Analysts own rules and custom functions. ROOST-published participant account, not independently tested telemetry or proof of CCF-template use.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-production"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Osprey",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was later reported using Osprey with locally authored rules",
            "sourceName": "Bluesky",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published account locates effects at the platform. No grant authority, upstream template author or ROOST repository permission is shown issuing a specific content order through this path.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "owns the reported effects receiver and local enforcement choices",
            "sourceName": "Bluesky",
            "targetName": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
            "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Launch account described planned/forthcoming availability and use. Later production account does not turn this announcement into contemporaneous deployment proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-planned"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
                "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Osprey",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named as planning adoption in July 2025",
            "sourceName": "Bluesky",
            "targetName": "Osprey",
            "date": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky",
            "heading": "Bluesky: implementation reaches a platform-owned action receiver",
            "text": "The described path is atproto event stream → Osprey with Bluesky-specific functions → Kafka output sink → effects receiver on Bluesky servers → action in Ozone . The account says analysts migrated and developed rules; its named example labels suspected t-shirt spammers. This identifies the platform's rule-writing and action integration, not ROOST approval of each decision. Setup still involved engineering, despite reduced dependence on engineers for subsequent rule changes.",
            "matched": [
              "Bluesky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d695bf741666990364094b2ee91d3e8e814f0af3afa82fd5a1a47935c3796ba5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky",
            "heading": "What enters the map",
            "text": "The supportable paths are Discord's reported production use / contribution / reintegration , and a ROOST-published account of Bluesky production use , with platform-configured rules and a local action integration . Where the case already holds the organizations and Osprey, reuse them. Do not create an enforcement-authority edge from a logo, model-provider affiliation or working-group attendance.",
            "matched": [
              "Bluesky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c26e5b413cb7f4343924fc6d5edff275a3aeb6fec572fd18f45e715b648e0541"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
      "label": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Reported Kafka-to-receiver-to-Ozone path applies platform decisions; distinguishes engine outputs from local enforcement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Implementation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
        "name": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
        "role": "Implementation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Reported Kafka-to-receiver-to-Ozone path applies platform decisions; distinguishes engine outputs from local enforcement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported Kafka-to-receiver-to-Ozone path applies platform decisions; distinguishes engine outputs from local enforcement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reported Kafka-to-receiver-to-Ozone path applies platform decisions; distinguishes engine outputs from local enforcement.",
        "structuralRole": "Implementation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Case study describes atproto events into Osprey, custom functions, Kafka and a Bluesky-owned effects receiver calling Ozone. Engine outputs become actions through this separate operator implementation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-output"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Osprey",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to send results through Kafka to a local receiver",
            "sourceName": "Osprey",
            "targetName": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
            "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published account locates effects at the platform. No grant authority, upstream template author or ROOST repository permission is shown issuing a specific content order through this path.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-bluesky-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bluesky",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "owns the reported effects receiver and local enforcement choices",
            "sourceName": "Bluesky",
            "targetName": "Bluesky-owned Osprey effects receiver",
            "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "label": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Pinned 7 February 2026 agent prototype for Osprey investigation/rule drafting. Not the same demonstrated stack as Discord or Bluesky production, and Ozone label methods are unimplemented.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Software"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-phoebe",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "name": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
        "role": "Software",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Pinned 7 February 2026 agent prototype for Osprey investigation/rule drafting. Not the same demonstrated stack as Discord or Bluesky production, and Ozone label methods are unimplemented.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Pinned 7 February 2026 agent prototype for Osprey investigation/rule drafting. Not the same demonstrated stack as Discord or Bluesky production, and Ozone label methods are unimplemented."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/haileyok/phoebe/commits/HEAD"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Phoebe is an agent-based investigation and rule-drafting prototype linked from ROOST Model Community's integration guidance. The examined version is pinned to 7 February 2026. It connects to a configured Osprey environment and can help inspect system metadata and prepare local rule files.",
        "structuralRole": "Prototype assistant for investigating events and drafting operator-controlled rules",
        "significance": "Phoebe shows a concrete route from language-model assistance to operational configuration. The consequential boundary is between generating a rule, checking its syntax and activating it in production. Its source exposes what the prototype actually implements, which is narrower than a complete autonomous moderation or reversal system.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Implemented tools and limits",
            "text": "The inspected adapter saves local rule files, potentially overwriting a matching file, and exposes a separate dry-run validation command. Agent instructions ask for validation of each new rule, but the save function does not enforce prior validation or human approval. Configuration selects models, endpoints and repository settings rather than hardwiring the Foundation's taxonomy. The Ozone adapter's label-application and removal methods raise NotImplementedError. MIT licensing permits software reuse, but confers neither service access nor platform authority. This prototype is not the demonstrated Discord or Bluesky production stack.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-guide-phoebe",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-config",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-tools",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-validation",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-ozone-boundary",
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-licence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "save_rule writes local .sml under the checked directory and may overwrite a matching file; may append Require when parent index exists. validate runs osprey-cli push-rules ../ruleset --dry-run. This is not remote production activation or validation of policy correctness.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-tools"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "exposes local rule-save and separate dry-run validation tools",
            "sourceName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "targetName": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Agent prompt asks validation of each new rule; inspected save function itself does not enforce prior validation or human approval. Agent loop/executor sandbox not fully audited and no observed bypass or unsafe deployment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-validation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "instructs validation without enforcing it in the save function",
            "sourceName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "targetName": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pinned defaults include a model setting and alternate backends; operator supplies service/repository settings. Adapter obtains action/feature/label/UDF metadata from the configured server, without a hardwired CCF taxonomy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-config"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "selects model, endpoint and repository configuration",
            "sourceName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "targetName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Both methods raise NotImplementedError and client remains TODO in this 18-line file. This prototype limit says nothing about all Ozone integrations or whether Bluesky can reverse a real action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-ozone-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "does not implement Ozone label application or removal in the inspected adapter",
            "sourceName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Guide example supplies a discovery/architecture relation. It does not establish the same deployment, model, CCF policy or enforcement chain used by Discord or Bluesky.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-guide-phoebe"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "links Phoebe as an investigation example",
            "sourceName": "ROOST Model Community (RMC)",
            "targetName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pinned MIT permission allows software reuse under notice/warranty conditions. It provides no server credentials, platform authority or licence to restricted data.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-licence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers MIT software rights without service or data entitlement",
            "sourceName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/haileyok/phoebe/commits/HEAD"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
            "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
      "label": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Static code writes local .sml files and separately runs push-rules with --dry-run. Save does not enforce prior validation or publish remote production changes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Implementation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
        "name": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
        "role": "Implementation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Static code writes local .sml files and separately runs push-rules with --dry-run. Save does not enforce prior validation or publish remote production changes.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Static code writes local .sml files and separately runs push-rules with --dry-run. Save does not enforce prior validation or publish remote production changes."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Static code writes local .sml files and separately runs push-rules with --dry-run. Save does not enforce prior validation or publish remote production changes.",
        "structuralRole": "Implementation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "save_rule writes local .sml under the checked directory and may overwrite a matching file; may append Require when parent index exists. validate runs osprey-cli push-rules ../ruleset --dry-run. This is not remote production activation or validation of policy correctness.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-tools"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "exposes local rule-save and separate dry-run validation tools",
            "sourceName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "targetName": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Agent prompt asks validation of each new rule; inspected save function itself does not enforce prior validation or human approval. Agent loop/executor sandbox not fully audited and no observed bypass or unsafe deployment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-phoebe-validation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "instructs validation without enforcing it in the save function",
            "sourceName": "Phoebe investigation prototype",
            "targetName": "Phoebe local rule drafting / dry-run path",
            "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
            "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "label": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "No-cost, selective capacity-building programme for eligible non-member company employees. Conditions govern access and materials while implementation is voluntary.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-pathways",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "name": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "No-cost, selective capacity-building programme for eligible non-member company employees. Conditions govern access and materials while implementation is voluntary.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "No-cost, selective capacity-building programme for eligible non-member company employees. Conditions govern access and materials while implementation is voluntary."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
            "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Pathways is the Tech Coalition's no-cost capacity-building programme for eligible employees of non-member companies handling user content or communications. Launched on 18 July 2024, it offers guidance, resources and licensing opportunities intended to strengthen companies' response to online child sexual exploitation and abuse.",
        "structuralRole": "Selective support and access programme connecting smaller companies to safety expertise",
        "significance": "Pathways extends the Coalition's practical reach beyond its formal membership through training, mentoring and application opportunities. Screening and terms govern who receives that support, but recipients retain implementation discretion. This is an influence channel through expertise and access rather than a demonstrated right to direct individual platform decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation, services and separate entitlements",
            "text": "The operator's December 2025 account reports 67 participant companies, five resources and two fireside chats. Applicants undergo eligibility and registration review and agree to published access and confidentiality conditions. Membership is neither required nor guaranteed. Accepted participants may apply for a PhotoDNA sublicense, which remains a separate approval; participation also does not imply Lantern access. The Coalition's paid Elevate advisory service is distinct from Pathways and from the Christchurch Call Foundation's separately named Elevate programme.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
                "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
                "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tc-pathways",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-gate",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-conditions",
              "w27-roost-e-elevate-complements",
              "w27-roost-e-stability-pathways",
              "w28-access-e-pathways-opportunity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current programme targets company employees handling user content/communications, excludes current member staff and vendors without that role, and reviews applicants. Coalition membership is neither required nor guaranteed. No registration or acceptance event observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-gate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers no-cost support after eligibility and registration review",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current page offers consulting alongside Pathways or membership. Its form links a distinct /terms/ page not acquired, so the nine Pathways clauses are not treated as this consulting contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-elevate-complements"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is described as a deeper service that can complement free support",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Intake links the nine clauses and confidentiality agreement; continued use accepts discretionary updates. This is a published condition, not proof a particular company accepted it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-conditions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires agreement to published non-member access conditions",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "targetName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Accepted Pathways page permits applying for a PhotoDNA sublicense. Programme admission does not guarantee licence, membership or reference-data access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-pathways-opportunity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers an application opportunity separate from participation",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "18 July 2024 launch described guidance and licensing opportunities. 18 December 2025 operator account reports 67 participant companies, five resources and two fireside chats; these are not ROOST deployment or independently measured outcome counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tc-pathways"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "launched and operates a capacity-building programme",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "date": "2024-07-18 – 2024-07-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Company post published 11 February 2026 says Pathways in 2025; 21 January 2025 company email PDF 65 says July 2024. Both attributed statements retained; exact signup date unresolved. Neither proves ROOST adoption or Lantern access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-stability-pathways"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
                "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
                "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stability AI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports participation with conflicting enrollment dates",
            "sourceName": "Stability AI",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "date": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
            "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "label": "Pathways non-member terms",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Nine published conditions on registration, requests, limited site IP and mentoring confidentiality, with user implementation discretion; no acceptance event acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Terms"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
        "name": "Pathways non-member terms",
        "role": "Terms",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Nine published conditions on registration, requests, limited site IP and mentoring confidentiality, with user implementation discretion; no acceptance event acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Nine published conditions on registration, requests, limited site IP and mentoring confidentiality, with user implementation discretion; no acceptance event acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Pathways non-member terms are nine published conditions governing access to the Tech Coalition's support programme and materials. They address registration, cooperation with information requests, limited intellectual-property permissions and confidentiality around mentoring, while leaving practical implementation to participants.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractual access conditions for a voluntary safety-support programme",
        "significance": "These terms show how an advisory programme can impose real obligations without acquiring platform enforcement power. They shape information exchange, permitted reuse and confidentiality at the support boundary. The explicit discretion over implementation is especially relevant when distinguishing institutional influence from binding moderation instructions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What participation requires",
            "text": "Participants must provide accurate registration information and make reasonable efforts to answer information requests within three months. The site-material licence is limited, revocable, personal, nonexclusive and nontransferable within its stated internal and noncommercial scope. Mentoring information is subject to confidentiality with limited need-to-know employee sharing. Clause 7 leaves whether and how to apply the materials to the user's discretion and disclaims a legal or community standard. Published terms establish the offered conditions, not acceptance or enforcement against a particular company.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-conditions",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-information",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-site-ip",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-confidentiality",
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Terms address information/feedback requests and reasonable efforts to respond to information requests within three months. The duties do not grant an right to a platform user database or amount to blanket assignment of feedback IP.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-information"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires accurate registration and information cooperation",
            "sourceName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Licence is personal, nonexclusive, nontransferable and internal/noncommercial within the stated site-material scope. It is not an assignment of participant inventions or universal permission to all linked third-party resources.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-site-ip"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "grants a limited revocable site licence and restricts copying",
            "sourceName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Clause 7 leaves whether/how to use materials to the participant and disclaims a legal/community standard. Access conditions are real while a binding instruction to remove content is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "leaves implementation voluntary and in the user’s discretion",
            "sourceName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Intake links the nine clauses and confidentiality agreement; continued use accepts discretionary updates. This is a published condition, not proof a particular company accepted it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-conditions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires agreement to published non-member access conditions",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "targetName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Mentoring confidentiality permits limited need-to-know employee sharing. It does not make every public programme statement confidential; no executed enforcement event acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-pathways-confidentiality"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "restricts disclosure of mentoring information",
            "sourceName": "Pathways non-member terms",
            "targetName": "Tool adopter / platform operator",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
      "label": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Tailored fee-quoted advisory/implementation service, separate from free Pathways and from CCF Elevate. Its distinct linked service terms were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-tc-elevate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
        "name": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Tailored fee-quoted advisory/implementation service, separate from free Pathways and from CCF Elevate. Its distinct linked service terms were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Tailored fee-quoted advisory/implementation service, separate from free Pathways and from CCF Elevate. Its distinct linked service terms were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tailored fee-quoted advisory/implementation service, separate from free Pathways and from CCF Elevate. Its distinct linked service terms were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Membership is unnecessary; pricing depends on scope/expertise/support and is specified in a tailored proposal. No fixed fee, paid amount, executed scope or consultant approval right acquired. Separate from CCF Elevate and its Canadian award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-tc-elevate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers tailored paid advisory and implementation support",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current page offers consulting alongside Pathways or membership. Its form links a distinct /terms/ page not acquired, so the nine Pathways clauses are not treated as this consulting contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-elevate-complements"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is described as a deeper service that can complement free support",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Elevate",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-stability-ai",
      "label": "Stability AI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company reports Pathways participation and later Coalition membership. Its two statements disagree on enrollment year; no ROOST or Lantern use inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-stability-ai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-stability-ai",
        "name": "Stability AI",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Company reports Pathways participation and later Coalition membership. Its two statements disagree on enrollment year; no ROOST or Lantern use inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company reports Pathways participation and later Coalition membership. Its two statements disagree on enrollment year; no ROOST or Lantern use inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
            "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Stability AI is an AI company that reports participating in the Tech Coalition's Pathways programme and subsequently joining the Coalition. Its statements identify a route from external support and peer learning into formal membership, with an unresolved discrepancy about the initial enrolment date.",
        "structuralRole": "Named participant illustrating the support-to-membership pathway",
        "significance": "The company provides a concrete counterpart to the Coalition's programme description. Participation can bring guidance and contacts into an AI developer's safety practice, while membership changes its institutional relationship. Neither status automatically proves access to restricted data-sharing services, a software sublicense or use of ROOST tools.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation is established; its start date is not settled",
            "text": "A company announcement published on 11 February 2026 says it joined Pathways in 2025 and later became a Coalition member. A company email dated 21 January 2025, retained in a Brennan Center document bundle, instead says Pathways participation began in July 2024. Both attributed statements remain in the evidence. The discrepancy limits the chronology but does not erase the reported relationship; no Lantern access or particular moderation configuration is established by either statement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
                "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
                "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-stability-pathways",
              "w27-roost-e-stability-membership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Company post published 11 February 2026 says Pathways in 2025; 21 January 2025 company email PDF 65 says July 2024. Both attributed statements retained; exact signup date unresolved. Neither proves ROOST adoption or Lantern access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-stability-pathways"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
                "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
                "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports participation with conflicting enrollment dates",
            "sourceName": "Stability AI",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "date": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "February 2026 company announcement names later membership and guidance/peer learning. Membership is not automatic Lantern access, a proved technology sublicense or any ROOST configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-stability-membership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
                "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported subsequent Coalition membership",
            "sourceName": "Stability AI",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition",
            "date": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
            "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-clint-smith",
      "label": "Clint Smith",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Current ROOST co-chair and listed Discord legal chief; also the named participant author of an Osprey account. Personal office and corporate appointment rights are distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w27-roost-clint-smith",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-clint-smith",
        "name": "Clint Smith",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "Current ROOST co-chair and listed Discord legal chief; also the named participant author of an Osprey account. Personal office and corporate appointment rights are distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current ROOST co-chair and listed Discord legal chief; also the named participant author of an Osprey account. Personal office and corporate appointment rights are distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "christchurch-roost",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Clint Smith is listed on ROOST's current team page as a co-chair and with a legal-leadership affiliation at Discord. He is also the named participant author of an account of Osprey's donation and subsequent development, connecting organisational leadership with a production-user perspective.",
        "structuralRole": "Individual governance bridge between ROOST and a contributing platform",
        "significance": "His overlapping roles help explain how a tool developed inside a major platform enters a shared infrastructure organisation. They also identify his Osprey account as informed participant evidence. A professional affiliation and personal board office do not by themselves establish a corporate appointment right or reserved Discord vote.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A dated governance record",
            "text": "ROOST's December 2025 inaugural-board announcement used the title Chair, while the later team page lists Smith as co-chair. The distinction preserves the dated descriptions rather than treating them as contradictory simultaneous offices. The retained sources establish his named position and Discord affiliation, but contain no instrument assigning that seat to Discord or specifying the company's power to appoint or remove its holder.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-clint-board",
              "w27-roost-e-clint-discord"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
              "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "ROOST current team and participant article identify Discord affiliation. Affiliation helps assess the production account as interested participant evidence; it does not establish a corporate reserved board vote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-clint-discord"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
                "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Discord",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed with a professional legal-leadership affiliation",
            "sourceName": "Clint Smith",
            "targetName": "Discord",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current team page lists Smith as co-chair; December 2025 announcement used Chair. This is a named individual office, not proof Discord appoints or controls that seat.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w27-roost-e-clint-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
                "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ROOST Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is listed as a current co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Clint Smith",
            "targetName": "ROOST Board",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Shared markets and disputed rules",
            "text": "The coalitions are also less tidy than a division between startups and incumbents. On 1 November 2024 , Andreessen and Horowitz coauthored an AI policy statement with Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Brad Smith, explicitly proposing collaboration across small and large firms. The later OpenAI financing is another reason not to treat “Little Tech” as a permanent category of company size or a prohibition on incumbent alliances.",
            "matched": [
              "Smith"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7fc6464c8112b0f3cd57638650d92e783e6901e618e81bbd5bfbdf60ab9d1305"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
            "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
            "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-photodna",
      "label": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Signature-comparison technology. Free provision/source-code licensing is not an open-source licence or automatic reference-data access.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-photodna",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-photodna",
        "name": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Signature-comparison technology. Free provision/source-code licensing is not an open-source licence or automatic reference-data access.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Signature-comparison technology. Free provision/source-code licensing is not an open-source licence or automatic reference-data access."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Microsoft PhotoDNA is signature-comparison technology that creates fingerprints for matching images against reference material. Microsoft describes qualified free provision and has licensed source code to named organisations. Its software rights, the service used to run it and access to a reference collection are separate arrangements.",
        "structuralRole": "Fingerprinting technology enabling known-content comparison across safety applications",
        "significance": "PhotoDNA supplies the technical comparison step that can be reused in several subject areas and institutions. It does not decide on its own which material belongs in a reference list or what a recipient should do with a match. Those decisions sit with licensors, custodians and platform operators in different combinations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Licensing history and broader use",
            "text": "Microsoft's March 2012 account names the Netherlands Forensics Institute and New Zealand's Department of Internal Affairs as source-code licensees. The Tech Coalition later developed a sublicense route and announced expanded subject matter in January 2025. StopNCII's March 2024 on-device integration predates that expansion announcement, so the latter cannot be called the first adult-image use. Qualified free provision is not an open-source licence and does not automatically include NCMEC or another organisation's reference data.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-software",
              "w28-access-e-ms-2012-license",
              "w28-access-e-tc-expanded-scope",
              "w28-access-e-stop-photodna2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Licensor account says Netherlands Forensics Institute and NZ Department of Internal Affairs had licensed source code. Not executed agreements, current licences or particular enforcement actions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-2012-license"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported named source-code licences in March 2012",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": "2012-03-19 – 2012-03-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SWGfL13March2024announcement describes integration with Microsoft support. This predates TCJanuary2025expanded-sublicence announcement; no executed assignment or licence terms acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-stop-photodna2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced on-device integration in March 2024",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": "2024-03-13 – 2024-03-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Announcement adds terrorist content and adult NCII alongside CSAM. This is the reported TC agreement expansion, not first-ever PhotoDNA use for adult NCII.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-tc-expanded-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports expanded permitted subject matter",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Microsoft describes signature computation and qualified free provision/donation, not open-source publication or access to every hash collection.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-software"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes qualified free software provision",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
      "label": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Live-posted May2018 service-specific instrument; separate from installed software and TC sublicensing. Incorporated versions and current commercial offer unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-photodna-cloud",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
        "name": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Live-posted May2018 service-specific instrument; separate from installed software and TC sublicensing. Incorporated versions and current commercial offer unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Live-posted May2018 service-specific instrument; separate from installed software and TC sublicensing. Incorporated versions and current commercial offer unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PhotoDNA Cloud is the service-specific offering governed by Microsoft's posted May 2018 terms, distinct from installed PhotoDNA software and the Tech Coalition's later sublicense route. The instrument describes continuing eligibility, permitted use, security duties and Microsoft's ability to suspend accounts.",
        "structuralRole": "Hosted-service access contract governing a particular PhotoDNA delivery model",
        "significance": "A hosted matching service adds a provider-controlled access and reporting layer to the underlying technology. Its terms can constrain who uses the service and for what purposes, while still leaving customer legal responsibilities intact. Applying these conditions to a different software licence would obscure the actual contract boundary.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Eligibility, audits and aggregate reporting",
            "text": "The posted terms limit use to child-sexual-abuse-material prevention or investigation and specified internal purposes, require accurate information and security, and retain eligibility and reverification discretion. They authorise usage audits and customer-identified aggregate match-count reporting to NCMEC. That authorisation does not replace a customer's own reporting obligations or prove a report was sent. The retained text is dated May 2018; it does not establish a current commercial offer, pricing, service-level guarantee or the terms incorporated into later Coalition software sublicences.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-cloud-authority",
              "w28-access-e-cloud-use-audit",
              "w28-access-e-cloud-report-ncmec"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CSAM prevention/investigation and internal-use conditions; customer-authorized usage audits and identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC. No universal end-user-data grant, current pricing verification or SLA.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-cloud-use-audit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PhotoDNA Cloud customer — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits use and requires audit/reporting cooperation",
            "sourceName": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "targetName": "PhotoDNA Cloud customer — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Posted May2018 terms specify continuing eligibility discretion, accurate information, security and account suspension. They do not govern later TC software sublicences by inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-cloud-authority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains eligibility, reverification and suspension powers",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Cloud terms authorize aggregate match-count reporting to NCMEC; this does not replace customer legal reporting or prove any actual report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-cloud-report-ncmec"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes customer-identified aggregate reporting",
            "sourceName": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "targetName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "label": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Reported delegated member/non-member software licensing, expanded January2025; master/applicant agreements and actual selection decisions not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
        "name": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Reported delegated member/non-member software licensing, expanded January2025; master/applicant agreements and actual selection decisions not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported delegated member/non-member software licensing, expanded January2025; master/applicant agreements and actual selection decisions not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Tech Coalition's PhotoDNA sublicense route is a programme for qualifying companies to obtain Microsoft's fingerprinting technology through the Coalition. Its reports date the sublicensor role to 2023, an expansion to qualifying non-members to 2024, and broader permitted subject matter to January 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Delegated software-licensing channel connecting a technology owner to qualifying adopters",
        "significance": "The route can reduce the institutional and technical work required to obtain a specialised matching capability. Licensing, integration support and reference-database access remain separate gates, however: a company able to compute fingerprints still needs permission and data to compare against restricted collections.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Expanded scope and distinct permissions",
            "text": "The 27 January 2025 announcement adds terrorist content and adult nonconsensual intimate imagery alongside child sexual abuse material, and offers no-charge code and licensing enquiries with a typical one-week response estimate. That estimate is not guaranteed approval. Coalition reporting describes Hash, Match and Action integration support for already licensed firms. Open-source integration software does not make PhotoDNA open source. Accepted Pathways participants may apply for a sublicense, but programme admission does not itself provide the licence, Coalition membership or NCMEC reference credentials.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-tc-delegation",
              "w28-access-e-tc-administers",
              "w28-access-e-tc-expanded-scope",
              "w28-access-e-tc-integration",
              "w28-access-e-pathways-opportunity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
              "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Accepted Pathways page permits applying for a PhotoDNA sublicense. Programme admission does not guarantee licence, membership or reference-data access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-pathways-opportunity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "offers an application opportunity separate from participation",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition Pathways",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Coalition2023 report attributes licensing provision to Microsoft;2024 report dates sublicensor role to2023 and qualifying non-member expansion to2024. Master contract and reserved approvals not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ms-tc-delegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported to have delegated PhotoDNA sublicensing",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "date": "2023–24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "January2025 announcement offers no-charge code/licensing inquiries and typical one-week response. Administrative estimate is not an award guarantee or executed applicant contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-tc-administers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes an expanded member and non-member licensing route",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition",
            "targetName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "date": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2024 report describes HMA integration for already licensed firms;2025 offers assistance. Open-source HMA does not make PhotoDNA open source or grant reference feeds.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-tc-integration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Licensed PhotoDNA implementer — role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers integration support to licensed companies",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "targetName": "Licensed PhotoDNA implementer — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Announcement adds terrorist content and adult NCII alongside CSAM. This is the reported TC agreement expansion, not first-ever PhotoDNA use for adult NCII.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-tc-expanded-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports expanded permitted subject matter",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
            "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-licensed-implementer",
      "label": "Licensed PhotoDNA implementer — role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Abstract recipient role, not a discovered applicant or guaranteed entitlement to all reference lists.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-licensed-implementer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-licensed-implementer",
        "name": "Licensed PhotoDNA implementer — role",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Abstract recipient role, not a discovered applicant or guaranteed entitlement to all reference lists.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Abstract recipient role, not a discovered applicant or guaranteed entitlement to all reference lists."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Abstract recipient role, not a discovered applicant or guaranteed entitlement to all reference lists.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2024 report describes HMA integration for already licensed firms;2025 offers assistance. Open-source HMA does not make PhotoDNA open source or grant reference feeds.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-tc-integration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers integration support to licensed companies",
            "sourceName": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicense route",
            "targetName": "Licensed PhotoDNA implementer — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
            "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-cloud-customer",
      "label": "PhotoDNA Cloud customer — role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Abstract customer of the dated hosted-service terms, not every installed PhotoDNA licensee.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-cloud-customer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-cloud-customer",
        "name": "PhotoDNA Cloud customer — role",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Abstract customer of the dated hosted-service terms, not every installed PhotoDNA licensee.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Abstract customer of the dated hosted-service terms, not every installed PhotoDNA licensee."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Abstract customer of the dated hosted-service terms, not every installed PhotoDNA licensee.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CSAM prevention/investigation and internal-use conditions; customer-authorized usage audits and identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC. No universal end-user-data grant, current pricing verification or SLA.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-cloud-use-audit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits use and requires audit/reporting cooperation",
            "sourceName": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "targetName": "PhotoDNA Cloud customer — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "label": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "NCMEC administers differentiated reference-sharing environments and reports review/correction work; software and data agreements remain distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-ncmec",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "name": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "NCMEC administers differentiated reference-sharing environments and reports review/correction work; software and data agreements remain distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "NCMEC administers differentiated reference-sharing environments and reports review/correction work; software and data agreements remain distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children administers reference-sharing environments and publishes information about reports and provider notifications concerning suspected child exploitation. Its role includes maintaining access arrangements, communicating reviewed information and reporting correction work, alongside data that outside companies may independently reuse.",
        "structuralRole": "Reference-data custodian and reporting institution connecting reviewed material with provider action",
        "significance": "NCMEC's information can enter platform safety workflows and commercial classification products through different routes. Credentials, public tables and training are not interchangeable forms of access. Distinguishing incoming reports, outgoing notices and reference hashes is essential because each has a different meaning and evidentiary threshold.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access and a documented correction episode",
            "text": "Its API separates read-only and read-write permissions across industry, nonprofit and law-enforcement environments. A Concentrix review of a particular hash list identified 59 exceptions; Concentrix says NCMEC reported removing all of them within five business days. NCMEC valued the donated audit at $300,000, an in-kind figure rather than cash paid. Separate public tables report provider-submitted reports and reviewed outbound notifications, including some exploitative imagery below the child-sexual-abuse-material threshold and predatory text. These totals are not confirmed criminal incidents or permanent labels for entire companies.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
                "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              },
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              },
              {
                "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
              },
              {
                "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-cloud-report-ncmec",
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-access",
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-correction",
              "w28-access-e-audit-in-kind",
              "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
              "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-incoming",
              "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
              "w30-class-e-tag-ncmec-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
              "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Methodology describes staff visual review and tracked notifications, including repeated notices and possible upstream contacts.2023columns separate CSAM, non-CSAM exploitative images of identified victims and predatory text. Mixed response tables are not permanent whole-company labels or unique-incident counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes reviewed-notice and response aggregates",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
            "date": "Reporting2021–2023; first publication dates not established"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2023table counts incoming provider reports about suspected exploitation/apparent CSAM. Variation in detection/reporting and included information prevents reading totals as outbound notices or confirmed criminal domains.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-incoming"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC2023 incoming CyberTipline report table",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes provider-submitted report counts",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "NCMEC2023 incoming CyberTipline report table",
            "date": "Reporting2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published API separates read-only/read-write permissions and industry/nonprofit/law-enforcement environments; no software licence alone supplies these credentials.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issues environment-specific credentials and permissions",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Cloud terms authorize aggregate match-count reporting to NCMEC; this does not replace customer legal reporting or prove any actual report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-cloud-report-ncmec"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
                "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "authorizes customer-identified aggregate reporting",
            "sourceName": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms and service",
            "targetName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NCMEC reports donated audit services valued at$300000; in-kind recipient valuation, not cash payment. Dollar currency not separately annotated in packet. Financial details: value: 300,000; currency: unknown; kind: reported in-kind valuation; period: Audit described April2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-audit-in-kind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Concentrix — audit provider",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was credited with a donated audit valued at $300000",
            "sourceName": "Concentrix — audit provider",
            "targetName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "date": "2024-04-15 – 2024-04-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Concentrix says it notified NCMEC and was told all59 were removed in less than five business days. No independent deletion log or recipient-wide correction/restoration proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-correction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to have removed the 59 notified exceptions",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "TAG's visible report describes NCMEC training for threat-exchange members. No operational shared dataset, database access or training-content adoption is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-tag-ncmec-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
                "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TAG threat-exchange members — training recipient class",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to train threat-exchange members",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "TAG threat-exchange members — training recipient class",
            "date": "2025report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "DV identifies public NCMEC data as a starting point. This does not establish direct supply agreement, endorsement or equivalence to NCMEC's hash-sharing resource.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named as public-data origin by DV",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          },
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion"
          },
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
            "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access"
          },
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "label": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Separate credentials/permissions and submitter-controlled visibility. Labels do not legally classify every entry in every environment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
        "name": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Separate credentials/permissions and submitter-controlled visibility. Labels do not legally classify every entry in every environment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate credentials/permissions and submitter-controlled visibility. Labels do not legally classify every entry in every environment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "NCMEC's reference-sharing environments are separately permissioned services for industry, nonprofit and law-enforcement participants. Their public API describes credentials, submission rights, visibility controls, feedback and retraction. A licence to fingerprinting software does not itself provide access to these collections.",
        "structuralRole": "Permissioned information environments with contributor-level control over visibility and retraction",
        "significance": "The environments make both access control and source responsibility concrete. Contributors can determine visibility and retract their own records, while recipients choose what subsets to retrieve and how to maintain local copies. Those choices determine whether an update is merely available or actually reflected in a downstream system.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Latest-state sharing and its limits",
            "text": "The API distinguishes read-only and read-write permissions. A submitter can restrict visibility; with no explicit grants, the default is visibility to all members, and removing the last grant restores that default. Only the submitter can retract its entries, with deletion markers available to queries; others can send positive or negative feedback. Usage guidance says there is no explicit mechanism to detect another party's visibility changes and newly gained access may require historical backfill. These are documented functions, not observed cache deletion or a universal user-appeal process.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-access",
              "w28-access-e-submitter-visibility",
              "w28-access-e-submitter-retraction",
              "w28-access-e-client-polling",
              "w28-access-e-provider-decisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Clients choose polling and subsets. Guide says no explicit mechanism detects others’ visibility changes; new access may need historical backfill. Visibility loss is not necessarily error correction, and no cache deletion/restoration was observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-client-polling"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies latest-state updates for locally maintained datasets",
            "sourceName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "targetName": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No explicit grants means all members; deleting last grant restores that default. Self-only visibility is separately described. Functions are not observed decisions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-submitter-visibility"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reference submitter — member role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can restrict visibility of its own entries",
            "sourceName": "Reference submitter — member role",
            "targetName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published API separates read-only/read-write permissions and industry/nonprofit/law-enforcement environments; no software licence alone supplies these credentials.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issues environment-specific credentials and permissions",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Queries can return deletion markers with submitter/entry/time. Other members can send positive/negative feedback, not adjudicate a universal appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-submitter-retraction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reference submitter — member role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "alone can retract its entries through the described API",
            "sourceName": "Reference submitter — member role",
            "targetName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "NCMEC notice categories distinguish CSAM, some exploitative imagery below that threshold and predatory text. Provider removal/blocking follows company terms; not all categories are criminal findings or every environment’s contents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-provider-decisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as informing company-policy action",
            "sourceName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "targetName": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
      "label": "Reference submitter — member role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Controls visibility and retraction of its submitted entries through documented functions; not an identified person or universal database authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
        "name": "Reference submitter — member role",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Controls visibility and retraction of its submitted entries through documented functions; not an identified person or universal database authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Controls visibility and retraction of its submitted entries through documented functions; not an identified person or universal database authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Controls visibility and retraction of its submitted entries through documented functions; not an identified person or universal database authority.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No explicit grants means all members; deleting last grant restores that default. Self-only visibility is separately described. Functions are not observed decisions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-submitter-visibility"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can restrict visibility of its own entries",
            "sourceName": "Reference submitter — member role",
            "targetName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Queries can return deletion markers with submitter/entry/time. Other members can send positive/negative feedback, not adjudicate a universal appeal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-submitter-retraction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "alone can retract its entries through the described API",
            "sourceName": "Reference submitter — member role",
            "targetName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-ncmec-client",
      "label": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Selects local subset, polling and downstream actions; no specific client cache or restored account observed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-ncmec-client",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-ncmec-client",
        "name": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Selects local subset, polling and downstream actions; no specific client cache or restored account observed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Selects local subset, polling and downstream actions; no specific client cache or restored account observed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Selects local subset, polling and downstream actions; no specific client cache or restored account observed.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Clients choose polling and subsets. Guide says no explicit mechanism detects others’ visibility changes; new access may need historical backfill. Visibility loss is not necessarily error correction, and no cache deletion/restoration was observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-client-polling"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
                "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies latest-state updates for locally maintained datasets",
            "sourceName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "targetName": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "NCMEC notice categories distinguish CSAM, some exploitative imagery below that threshold and predatory text. Provider removal/blocking follows company terms; not all categories are criminal findings or every environment’s contents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-provider-decisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as informing company-policy action",
            "sourceName": "NCMEC reference-sharing environments",
            "targetName": "Reference recipient / local dataset — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-concentrix",
      "label": "Concentrix — audit provider",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named attestation author; review contract reported July2023 and donated service valued by NCMEC. No broader ownership inquiry.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-concentrix",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-concentrix",
        "name": "Concentrix — audit provider",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Named attestation author; review contract reported July2023 and donated service valued by NCMEC. No broader ownership inquiry.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named attestation author; review contract reported July2023 and donated service valued by NCMEC. No broader ownership inquiry."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Concentrix is the named attestation author for a 2023 review of a particular NCMEC hash list. Its report describes review of 538,922 unique files between 16 October and 8 December 2023. NCMEC later credited the audit as donated professional services.",
        "structuralRole": "External reviewer supplying a finite reference-list audit and correction notification",
        "significance": "The review provides unusually specific evidence about a reference collection's quality and a response to identified exceptions. Its value comes from the defined list, period and findings. It does not establish the accuracy of every NCMEC environment, future version or downstream platform action.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Exceptions and reported response",
            "text": "The attestation identifies 59 exceptions: fifty files judged outside the stated definition, five cartoons or anime also outside it, two unplayable videos and two uncertain ages. Concentrix says it notified NCMEC and was told all 59 were removed within five business days. The reported 99.99% agreement applies to that reviewed list and version. NCMEC valued the donated service at $300,000, with no separate currency annotation in the retained account. No independent deletion log, recipient-wide correction record or complete audit workpapers were acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
              },
              {
                "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-concentrix-audit",
              "w28-access-e-audit-in-kind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NCMEC reports donated audit services valued at$300000; in-kind recipient valuation, not cash payment. Dollar currency not separately annotated in packet. Financial details: value: 300,000; currency: unknown; kind: reported in-kind valuation; period: Audit described April2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-audit-in-kind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was credited with a donated audit valued at $300000",
            "sourceName": "Concentrix — audit provider",
            "targetName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "date": "2024-04-15 – 2024-04-15"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "538922 unique files reviewed16Oct–8Dec2023.59 exceptions:50 judged outside stated definition,5 cartoons/anime also outside,2 unplayable videos,2 uncertain ages.99.99% concerns that list/version only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-concentrix-audit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "attested a finite two-review audit",
            "sourceName": "Concentrix — audit provider",
            "targetName": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
            "date": "16 October–8 December 2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response",
            "heading": "Review and removal: a specific public record",
            "text": "Page3 says Concentrix notified NCMEC and was told that NCMEC removed all59 in less than five business days. This is a concrete auditor-reported correction notification, not an independently observed deletion log or proof of recipient-wide correction. Reported99.99% agreement concerns that reviewed list/version; it is not all NCMEC environments or future datasets. The entire audit contract, workpapers and downstream acknowledgements remain unacquired.",
            "matched": [
              "Concentrix"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3835c6647cf7dc6e8d875d4edc62ab372c8504ab6307bdc815b593a1462b7552"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
      "label": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Finite review of538922 unique files.59 differentiated exceptions; auditor reports being told NCMEC removed all59, not direct deletion or downstream restoration evidence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
        "name": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Finite review of538922 unique files.59 differentiated exceptions; auditor reports being told NCMEC removed all59, not direct deletion or downstream restoration evidence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Finite review of538922 unique files.59 differentiated exceptions; auditor reports being told NCMEC removed all59, not direct deletion or downstream restoration evidence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Finite review of538922 unique files.59 differentiated exceptions; auditor reports being told NCMEC removed all59, not direct deletion or downstream restoration evidence.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "538922 unique files reviewed16Oct–8Dec2023.59 exceptions:50 judged outside stated definition,5 cartoons/anime also outside,2 unplayable videos,2 uncertain ages.99.99% concerns that list/version only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-concentrix-audit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Concentrix — audit provider",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "attested a finite two-review audit",
            "sourceName": "Concentrix — audit provider",
            "targetName": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
            "date": "16 October–8 December 2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Concentrix says it notified NCMEC and was told all59 were removed in less than five business days. No independent deletion log or recipient-wide correction/restoration proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-ncmec-correction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to have removed the 59 notified exceptions",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "2023 NCMEC list audit / reported correction",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
            "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Charitable guarantee company05589479; charities1120354/SC051351. Legal operator distinct from programmes and platform participation; no share capital.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-swgfl",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "name": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Charitable guarantee company05589479; charities1120354/SC051351. Legal operator distinct from programmes and platform participation; no share capital.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Charitable guarantee company05589479; charities1120354/SC051351. Legal operator distinct from programmes and platform participation; no share capital."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 15
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Charitable guarantee company05589479; charities1120354/SC051351. Legal operator distinct from programmes and platform participation; no share capital.",
        "structuralRole": "A charity connecting safety services and funded programmes",
        "significance": "SWGfL appears as a provider and coordinator of practical online-safety services, including work within the UK Safer Internet Centre. Its grants, service roles and participation in governance need to be followed separately to understand how resources become operational capacity.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "SWGfL Note19 records Nominet grant income and expenditure of GBP 773,395 in FY 2025, zero opening/closing restricted balance, and expressly states UKSIC consortium-operation purpose. FY 2024 comparative income was GBP 842,780. Recognition requires entitlement, relevant performance conditions, probable receipt and measurement; these are not bank receipts or a donor acceptance certificate. Pershing/StopNCII remains a separate purpose. Financial details: value: 773,395; currency: GBP; kind: SWGfL recognized Nominet restricted-grant income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-swgfl-recognition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as the source of a recognized UKSIC grant",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "META/Facebook fund:FY2024£20000 incoming and expended, purpose combating NCII sharing/supporting victims. Exact paying Meta entity and StopNCII-only allocation unestablished; no FY2025row does not establish all support ended. Financial details: value: 20,000; currency: GBP; kind: comparative restricted income; equal expense; period: Year ended31March2024",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-meta-swgfl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is labelled as comparative restricted support in the accounts",
            "sourceName": "Meta",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Adverse screening results receive human context review; not solely automated refusal. Where screening informs an adverse decision, uninvolved review, correction/annotation and vendor correction are offered; acknowledgment2workingdays,response30workingdays. Not universal admission appeal or observed performance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-admin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes human screening review and narrow challenge commitments",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Introduction company5589479/charities1120354,SC051351 contrasts definition03948864/1099649. Empty hash definition, undefined-purpose terminology and bracketed periods remain. No legal entity is merged based on those erroneous/conflicting fields.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "posts an access instrument with unresolved drafting and identity conflicts",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "API describes CSP submissions, NGO-reviewedActive and public-userReceived entries, associated cases and independent feedback. Public-user eligibility is not the only institutional input; described types are not proof every function is deployed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-swgfl-issued-api"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents provider credentials and several input categories",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles19–26 give meeting/alternate agreement rules, qualified conflicts, CEO appointment and recorded/revocable committees. Terms may require Board approval or agreed budget; no actual StopNCII delegation/minute acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-trustee-delegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may impose budget limits and revoke recorded delegations",
            "sourceName": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Pershing Grant FY2025£75802 and FY2024comparative£78847 each matched by expense with zero opening/closing restricted balance. Legal donor unresolved; accounting recognition, not bank cash or full StopNCII budget.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-pershing-income"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is recorded as restricted incoming and expended resources",
            "sourceName": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles8/10/13–14 make trustees the only members, with one vote each and trustee appointment by resolution. Corporate membership differs from paying platform participation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-trustee-members"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hold sole corporate membership and management rights",
            "sourceName": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority",
            "title": "StopNCII public-user authority: entry, withdrawal and continuing platform decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "South West Grid for Learning Trust, usually called SWGfL, is the charity behind StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline. It combines frontline support with technical services, controls routes into its partner programmes and contributes expertise used in UK online-safety regulation.",
          "structuralRole": "Operating protective services and administering platform participation",
          "significance": "SWGfL is an operational hinge: public and philanthropic resources help sustain services whose data can inform platform action. Its role includes the practical decisions about partner admission, technical integration and service governance that determine how those tools reach users.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "SWGfL is a charity operating practical online-safety services, including the Revenge Porn Helpline and StopNCII. Its position in this network comes from running services other organizations use, as well as participating in the policy debate. Its trustees are the company's members and hold management and appointment powers, with delegations that can be limited or revoked.",
            "StopNCII helps address non-consensual intimate images through a system of reference information and participating services. Its technical documentation describes several routes for information to enter the system, including public users, reviewed NGO cases and provider submissions. The documentation also distinguishes statuses and feedback. These details matter because a reference supplied to a platform begins a process that the receiving service must interpret and act upon.",
            "SWGfL administers routes for businesses to join that infrastructure. Its published diagrams describe registration, verification, agreement, payment and technical integration for an approved participant, with additional engagement for programme partners. Its screening policy provides human consideration of adverse results and a review route where screening informs a negative decision. The service therefore depends on organizational access decisions as well as software.",
            "Its resources come through several channels. The 2025 accounts recognize £773,395 from Nominet for UK Safer Internet Centre work and £225,000 from the Home Office for violence-against-women work. Ofcom's September 2026 non-consensual-image announcement describes SWGfL expertise through a partnership and recommends StopNCII as one suitable option. That connection shows how a charity-operated service can move from practical assistance into the set of tools a regulator points companies toward."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
              "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
            },
            {
              "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
              "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
              "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
              "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
            },
            {
              "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
              "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
      "label": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Trustees are the only corporate members; management, appointments and recorded/revocable delegation under2024articles. No donor-reserved seat proved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
        "name": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Trustees are the only corporate members; management, appointments and recorded/revocable delegation under2024articles. No donor-reserved seat proved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Trustees are the only corporate members; management, appointments and recorded/revocable delegation under2024articles. No donor-reserved seat proved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "SWGfL's trustees are also its only corporate members under the articles adopted on 10 October 2024. They hold the organisation's management and appointment rights and can delegate responsibilities under recorded, revocable arrangements. This governance role is distinct from paying participation in StopNCII.",
        "structuralRole": "Corporate membership and governing authority over the StopNCII operator",
        "significance": "The articles locate ultimate organisational authority in the trustees, rather than automatically in donors, technology suppliers or partner platforms. Budget limits and revocable delegation can shape how programmes operate. A participant's fee or an employee's former affiliation does not by itself create a reserved governing seat.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Appointments, delegation and a named overlap",
            "text": "The articles provide one vote per trustee-member and appointment by resolution, with rules for meetings, alternatives to meetings, conflicts, chief-executive appointment and committees. Delegated terms may require board approval or an agreed budget. Karuna Nain's director appointment is recorded as 3 April 2024 and the current operator page lists her as a trustee, with a former Meta safety-policy role. The underlying appointment resolution, any donor nomination right and an actual StopNCII programme delegation were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-trustee-members",
              "w28-access-e-trustee-delegation",
              "w28-access-e-nain-trustee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles19–26 give meeting/alternate agreement rules, qualified conflicts, CEO appointment and recorded/revocable committees. Terms may require Board approval or agreed budget; no actual StopNCII delegation/minute acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-trustee-delegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may impose budget limits and revoke recorded delegations",
            "sourceName": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles8/10/13–14 make trustees the only members, with one vote each and trustee appointment by resolution. Corporate membership differs from paying platform participation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-trustee-members"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hold sole corporate membership and management rights",
            "sourceName": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Appointment3April2024 filed26April; current About lists trustee. Underlying appointment resolution and donor nomination not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nain-trustee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Karuna Nain",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has a filed director appointment and current trustee role",
            "sourceName": "Karuna Nain",
            "targetName": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "date": "2024-04-03 – 2024-04-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "StopNCII",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "SWGfL programme with public-user and institutional contribution routes. Hash signals, partner access, withdrawal and platform policy decisions are distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stopncii",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "name": "StopNCII",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "SWGfL programme with public-user and institutional contribution routes. Hash signals, partner access, withdrawal and platform policy decisions are distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "SWGfL programme with public-user and institutional contribution routes. Hash signals, partner access, withdrawal and platform policy decisions are distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
            "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
            "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "StopNCII is a SWGfL programme intended to prevent the sharing of nonconsensual intimate images. Its public-user workflow creates a fingerprint on the person's device and shares reference information with participating platforms, while the documented system also provides institutional contribution and feedback routes.",
        "structuralRole": "Victim-facing reference programme connecting on-device fingerprints to platform safety workflows",
        "significance": "The programme lets a person seek protection across participating services without sending the original image through the public-user workflow. Its effectiveness depends on both central reference administration and recipients' policies and integrations. Software support, donor funding, partner admission and individual content decisions occupy different points in that chain.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A shared signal with several gates",
            "text": "Public users must meet the adult eligibility rules and possess the intimate material; synthetic depictions are included. SWGfL announced on-device PhotoDNA integration in March 2024 with Microsoft support. The six-step guide conditions platform removal on the recipient's policy, and case withdrawal does not necessarily reverse an independent policy decision. Ofcom's September 2026 statement recommends StopNCII as a suitable option while permitting equally effective alternatives. That recognition is distinct from exclusive procurement or guaranteed access under a particular partner agreement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
                "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
                "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-swgfl-stop",
              "w28-access-e-pershing-purpose",
              "w28-access-e-user-entry",
              "w28-access-e-partner-own-policy",
              "w28-access-e-stop-photodna2024",
              "w28-access-e-bing-donation",
              "w28-access-e-google-rollout",
              "w28-access-e-fsc-promotes",
              "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Six-step guide conditions removal on platform intimate-image-abuse policy. Privacy preserves continued removal of policy-violating content after withdrawal, not a proved right to retain withdrawn reference unchanged or promise of restoration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-partner-own-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains its own policy assessment and continuing-removal basis",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Depicted person must hold intimate material and meet the adult rule; FAQ says over18 in the image. Synthetic depictions included; no on-behalf submission here. Not universal input rules or verified identity evidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-entry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may create a case under the public-user eligibility rules",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The NCII news recommends StopNCII while allowing equally effective alternatives; it does not require purchasing a sole supplier or establish terms of access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommended StopNCII as a suitable option",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": "2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Filed trustee account and controller notice identify the service within SWGfL. No separate programme company or Meta equity ownership established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-swgfl-stop"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates StopNCII",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Note19purpose names StopNCII support. No executed grant, donor rights, programme cost centre or full funding allocation acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-pershing-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has an accounts purpose expressly supporting StopNCII",
            "sourceName": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FSC26February2026article invokes legal/reputational risk and banks/processors. Industry advocacy, not bank instruction, payment disconnection or independently confirmed named-adopter counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-fsc-promotes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
                "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Free Speech Coalition",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advocates adoption partly for payment-partner credibility",
            "sourceName": "Free Speech Coalition",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SWGfL13March2024announcement describes integration with Microsoft support. This predates TCJanuary2025expanded-sublicence announcement; no executed assignment or licence terms acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-stop-photodna2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced on-device integration in March 2024",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII",
            "targetName": "Microsoft PhotoDNA",
            "date": "2024-03-13 – 2024-03-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Microsoft credits its technology donation enabling on-device PhotoDNA. In-kind capability account, no monetary value, ownership of StopNCII or grant-control right established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-bing-donation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported donating the March2024 capability",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition CLOSED. StopNCII exposes several distinct gates: admission and payment, reference contributions and feedback, withdrawal processing, and platform action. Published terms are not an executed partner-specific agreement. All observations below concern public administrative records; no live case or operational API was used.",
            "matched": [
              "StopNCII"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4acf52bba8708713d2e294f685fb433383a978c3dc04d89ca1d0eea3939513c3"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights",
            "heading": "What is now visible; what remains consequentially open",
            "text": "There is direct evidence of earmarked support reaching the operator's accounts for StopNCII and broader victim-support work, alongside a trustee-governed charity constitution. Funds, corporate membership, service participation and individual trustee biographies are different relationships. The documents do not establish that Meta, Pershing, government or a paying platform selected an entry, dictated a definition, approved a withdrawal or controlled another platform's action.",
            "matched": [
              "StopNCII"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ab81cf9945f7939468fcabb40834e28ccb0d953c9e0547dae61f91b8bf24a726"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights",
            "heading": "What is now visible; what remains consequentially open",
            "text": "The next discriminating records are the executed programme grant/partnership schedules, the current StopNCII internal delegation/budget and any actual approval or reporting instrument. Those could reveal renewal/termination rights, deliverable acceptance, IP ownership, policy clearance or operational conditions beyond the purpose restrictions visible in the accounts. A current public donor-side record could resolve the abbreviated Pershing label; this run leaves it unexpanded. Likely custodians are SWGfL and the respective funder/partner. No request was made.",
            "matched": [
              "StopNCII"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "38731fdc59b782d58ae99437194578081e058e43fe5c4d20c27dc677dc3258a9"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
            "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
            "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority",
            "title": "StopNCII public-user authority: entry, withdrawal and continuing platform decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-rph",
      "label": "Revenge Porn Helpline",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "SWGfL support service; not a separately established corporation or the same budget as StopNCII.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-rph",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-rph",
        "name": "Revenge Porn Helpline",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "SWGfL support service; not a separately established corporation or the same budget as StopNCII.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "SWGfL support service; not a separately established corporation or the same budget as StopNCII."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "SWGfL support service; not a separately established corporation or the same budget as StopNCII.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AccountsPDF5 and current institutional page describe the service; CEO account dates creation2015. Not a separately established corporation or identical programme budget.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-swgfl-rph"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes the Helpline as its support service",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Revenge Porn Helpline",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-user",
      "label": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Depicted adult with material and case credentials under public-user FAQ; this is not the only database-input route or an observed identity verification.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-user",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-user",
        "name": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Depicted adult with material and case credentials under public-user FAQ; this is not the only database-input route or an observed identity verification.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Depicted adult with material and case credentials under public-user FAQ; this is not the only database-input route or an observed identity verification."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Depicted adult with material and case credentials under public-user FAQ; this is not the only database-input route or an observed identity verification.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Depicted person must hold intimate material and meet the adult rule; FAQ says over18 in the image. Synthetic depictions included; no on-behalf submission here. Not universal input rules or verified identity evidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-entry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may create a case under the public-user eligibility rules",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ requires case number/password; no recovery if lost. Full notice promises SWGfL erasure and partner erasure instructions. No actual request, delivered instruction or recipient compliance established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-withdrawal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can request whole-case withdrawal using credentials",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Six-step account says original remains on device while hash is shared. Published workflow, not executed privacy/technical guarantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-hash"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as submitting an on-device hash",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority",
            "title": "StopNCII public-user authority: entry, withdrawal and continuing platform decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Documented multiple cases, provider/NGO/public-user inputs and feedback. Withdrawal/status markers are not automatic restoration.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-reference",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "name": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Documented multiple cases, provider/NGO/public-user inputs and feedback. Withdrawal/status markers are not automatic restoration.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Documented multiple cases, provider/NGO/public-user inputs and feedback. Withdrawal/status markers are not automatic restoration."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The StopNCII reference and status dataset contains fingerprints, cases, contribution categories and feedback used by participating platforms. Its documented inputs include public users, reviewed nonprofit submissions and provider submissions. It is the maintained information layer underneath the public service and recipient matching workflows.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared reference collection and update channel connecting submissions to recipient systems",
        "significance": "This dataset is where a protective request becomes a reusable signal. Its status history and withdrawal handling matter as much as initial matching, because recipients maintain their own copies or integrations. A changed central status must travel through those systems before it can affect an earlier platform decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Inputs, withdrawal and reported use",
            "text": "The public workflow says the original image remains on the user's device while a hash is shared. Whole-case withdrawal requires the case number and password, with no recovery if they are lost; the privacy notice promises erasure and instructions to partners. API documentation describes multiple institutional input states and limited deletion-marker availability. Microsoft reported action on 268,899 Bing image results by the end of August 2024, while Snap reported daily updates and exclusion of withdrawn/deleted entries on specified surfaces. Neither account supplies a paired withdrawal-to-restoration trace.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-hash",
              "w28-access-e-user-recipient-scope",
              "w28-access-e-user-withdrawal",
              "w28-access-e-swgfl-issued-api",
              "w28-access-e-partner-api-contribution",
              "w28-access-e-list-status-polling",
              "w28-access-e-bing-pilot",
              "w28-access-e-snap-filtering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "API describes CSP submissions, NGO-reviewedActive and public-userReceived entries, associated cases and independent feedback. Public-user eligibility is not the only institutional input; described types are not proof every function is deployed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-swgfl-issued-api"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents provider credentials and several input categories",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Recipients are asked to record status changes; delayed pagination can miss deleted records. Printed6and15wording must not become one tested universal deletion clock. No downstream restored-item trace acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-list-status-polling"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents status changes and limited deletion-marker availability",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ requires case number/password; no recovery if lost. Full notice promises SWGfL erasure and partner erasure instructions. No actual request, delivered instruction or recipient compliance established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-withdrawal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can request whole-case withdrawal using credentials",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "API documents provider feedback replacement/removal, timestamps and own-submission withdrawal. Batch management expressly unimplemented; text/URLexamples are not observed censorship records.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-partner-api-contribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can contribute and withdraw its own submissions in the documented interface",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "January2026notice says users cannot choose recipients. This does not assign participants a right to all other applicant information.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-recipient-scope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is shared with current and future participating platforms",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": "January2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "eSafetyTable3summarizes Snap using StopNCII onSpotlight/Discover/Stories, excludingWithdrawn/Deleted;Chatrow does not list it. Provider response for15June–15December2024, not regulator runtime testing/current2026guarantee or paired restoration trace.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-snap-filtering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
                "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Snap",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported daily updates and withdrawal-state exclusion on named surfaces",
            "sourceName": "Snap",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": "15 June–15 December2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "By endAugust2024, operator reports action on268899images in search. Not unique victims, source-website removals, independent audit or current2026operation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-bing-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
                "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a Bing pilot and 268899 image-result actions",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": "By end August2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Six-step account says original remains on device while hash is shared. Published workflow, not executed privacy/technical guarantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-hash"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as submitting an on-device hash",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII public submitter — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority",
            "title": "StopNCII public-user authority: entry, withdrawal and continuing platform decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Abstract organizational recipient; own policy judgement and access conditions. Not a customer list or a verified vote holder.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-partner",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "name": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Abstract organizational recipient; own policy judgement and access conditions. Not a customer list or a verified vote holder.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Abstract organizational recipient; own policy judgement and access conditions. Not a customer list or a verified vote holder."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 10
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A StopNCII recipient platform is an organisation admitted to receive the programme's reference information and compare it with content on its own service. This abstract role covers the recipient's technical integration and policy decisions, rather than identifying a particular customer or a holder of programme voting rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Reference-data recipient responsible for local matching, review and content action",
        "significance": "The recipient is where a shared fingerprint becomes a possible consequence for content. StopNCII's signals assist identification, but the platform applies its own intimate-image-abuse policy and must handle updates. Access fees and programme participation are separate from proof of a particular removal or authority over another participant.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access, updates and continuing policy decisions",
            "text": "The January 2026 privacy notice says case information is shared with current and future participating platforms and users cannot select recipients. The API describes status changes, provider feedback and withdrawal of a provider's own submissions. Delayed retrieval can miss some deletion markers, making integration behaviour consequential. Posted partner terms restrict credentials and redistribution and describe security and reporting duties, although the public text contains unfinished clauses. A platform may continue removing independently policy-violating content after case withdrawal; withdrawal is therefore not a blanket promise of restoration.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
              },
              {
                "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-user-recipient-scope",
              "w28-access-e-partner-own-policy",
              "w28-access-e-partner-api-contribution",
              "w28-access-e-list-status-polling",
              "w28-access-e-approved-fees",
              "w28-access-e-programme-fees",
              "w28-access-e-terms-eligibility",
              "w28-access-e-terms-use",
              "w28-access-e-terms-security",
              "w28-access-e-terms-termination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Credential compromise notice24hours; schedule general incidents48hours; annual summaries within60days of anniversary. Security assessments/caching/incremental retrieval described. [30]implementation and [5]termination certification periods remain unfinished, not settled clocks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-security"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies scoped incident and implementation reporting",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Personal organizational credentials/no third-party sharing; redistribution/resale prohibited. Training exception is strictly for implementing agreed purpose on partner platform. Purpose comes from not obtained DSA; neither total training ban nor general training/data licence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "restricts credentials, redistribution and model training",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Six-step guide conditions removal on platform intimate-image-abuse policy. Privacy preserves continued removal of policy-violating content after withdrawal, not a proved right to retain withdrawn reference unchanged or promise of restoration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-partner-own-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains its own policy assessment and continuing-removal basis",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Posted criteria cover need, security, implementation, compliance and reputational/ethical/legal risk; sole-discretion/no-reasons refusal and continued eligibility review. Not an actual refusal, signed contract or unlimited lawful discretion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-eligibility"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reserves vetting, reverification and access-suspension powers",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "New business£1000;below£10m£4000;£10–249m£8000;£250–499m£12000;£500–999m£16000;over£1bn£20000. Exact endpoint/intervening-band treatment unclarified. Schedule is not receipts or universal historical partner payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-approved-fees"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Participant access route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes revenue-tier annual GBP access fees",
            "sourceName": "Approved Participant access route",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Recipients are asked to record status changes; delayed pagination can miss deleted records. Printed6and15wording must not become one tested universal deletion clock. No downstream restored-item trace acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-list-status-polling"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "documents status changes and limited deletion-marker availability",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Termination grounds depend on not obtained DSA; cessation/destruction/certification specified with unfinished [5]business-day number. Separate from public-user hash withdrawal or restoration of content.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-termination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires cessation and deletion on partner termination",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "API documents provider feedback replacement/removal, timestamps and own-submission withdrawal. Batch management expressly unimplemented; text/URLexamples are not observed censorship records.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-partner-api-contribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can contribute and withdraw its own submissions in the documented interface",
            "sourceName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "targetName": "StopNCII reference/status dataset",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority",
            "title": "StopNCII public-user authority: entry, withdrawal and continuing platform decisions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-approved",
      "label": "Approved Participant access route",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Lower annual fee schedule and depicted onboarding; advertised benefits conflict with generic join comparison.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-approved",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-approved",
        "name": "Approved Participant access route",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Lower annual fee schedule and depicted onboarding; advertised benefits conflict with generic join comparison.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Lower annual fee schedule and depicted onboarding; advertised benefits conflict with generic join comparison."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Approved Participant is one of StopNCII's published organisational access routes. It provides a path from registration and verification through a data-sharing agreement, payment and technical integration to approved status. Its displayed fee schedule is lower than the separate Programme Partner route.",
        "structuralRole": "Paid admission route for organisations seeking StopNCII integration",
        "significance": "This route makes access to a shared protective resource conditional on eligibility, agreement and resources for integration. A posted price can affect which organisations participate, but it is not evidence of actual receipts, historical partner payments or a purchased vote in programme governance.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Fees and inconsistent benefit descriptions",
            "text": "The annual GBP schedule displays £1,000 for a new business, then £4,000, £8,000, £12,000, £16,000 and £20,000 across the published revenue bands from below £10 million to above £1 billion. Exact endpoint treatment is not clarified. The generic comparison table assigns both routes network, calls and policy-development benefits, while Approved Participant prose denies wider involvement. The public materials therefore do not settle the precise tier entitlement. No particular applicant's acceptance, executed agreement or successful integration was observed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
              },
              {
                "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-stop-two-routes",
              "w28-access-e-approved-fees",
              "w28-access-e-participation-conflict"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "New business£1000;below£10m£4000;£10–249m£8000;£250–499m£12000;£500–999m£16000;over£1bn£20000. Exact endpoint/intervening-band treatment unclarified. Schedule is not receipts or universal historical partner payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-approved-fees"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes revenue-tier annual GBP access fees",
            "sourceName": "Approved Participant access route",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Join table assigns both routes network/call/policy-development benefits, while Approved Participant prose denies wider involvement. No adjudicated tier entitlement or actual decision-right allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-participation-conflict"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Programme Partner access route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has conflicting public benefit comparisons",
            "sourceName": "Approved Participant access route",
            "targetName": "Programme Partner access route",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Depicted path:registration,verification,DSA,payment,integration,approved status. No executed agreement or observed gate.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-stop-two-routes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes an approved-participant route",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Approved Participant access route",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-programme",
      "label": "Programme Partner access route",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Higher annual fee schedule; advertised network/policy engagement, no defined vote/veto or decision exercise.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-programme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-programme",
        "name": "Programme Partner access route",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Higher annual fee schedule; advertised network/policy engagement, no defined vote/veto or decision exercise.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Higher annual fee schedule; advertised network/policy engagement, no defined vote/veto or decision exercise."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Programme Partner is StopNCII's fuller published organisational participation route, combining integration with advertised networking, working groups and policy-development engagement. Its onboarding diagram adds contact with the team and an announcement, and its displayed annual fee scale differs from the Approved Participant route.",
        "structuralRole": "Paid programme-participation route coupling reference access with wider engagement",
        "significance": "The route can connect paying platforms more closely to the people and discussions shaping a shared service. That is a meaningful influence channel, but advertised participation does not specify a vote, veto or authority over another platform's actions. Exact entitlements require a complete agreement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Higher fees, unresolved public comparisons",
            "text": "For the displayed revenue bands, annual fees are £1,000 for new businesses and then £10,000, £20,000, £30,000, £40,000 and £50,000. These are published GBP prices, not paid invoices or donations. The generic posted terms instead carry the lower fee scale, and the join comparison conflicts with prose about whether Approved Participants receive wider programme involvement. The public record therefore supports the existence of differentiated routes while leaving precise benefits and decision rights unresolved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
              },
              {
                "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-stop-programme-route",
              "w28-access-e-programme-fees",
              "w28-access-e-participation-conflict"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Join table assigns both routes network/call/policy-development benefits, while Approved Participant prose denies wider involvement. No adjudicated tier entitlement or actual decision-right allocation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-participation-conflict"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Approved Participant access route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has conflicting public benefit comparisons",
            "sourceName": "Approved Participant access route",
            "targetName": "Programme Partner access route",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Same displayed bands:£1000/10000/20000/30000/40000/50000. Published prices, not invoices, donations received or purchased policy votes; generic posted terms instead carry lower scale.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-programme-fees"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a different annual fee scale",
            "sourceName": "Programme Partner access route",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Diagram adds meeting team and announcement. Advertised working groups/policy-development engagement confers no specified vote or veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-stop-programme-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a fuller programme-partner route",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Programme Partner access route",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "label": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Observed public text with conflicting identifiers, unfinished brackets and purpose definitions. Separate data-sharing agreement and executed participant assent remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
        "name": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Observed public text with conflicting identifiers, unfinished brackets and purpose definitions. Separate data-sharing agreement and executed participant assent remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Observed public text with conflicting identifiers, unfinished brackets and purpose definitions. Separate data-sharing agreement and executed participant assent remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The posted StopNCII partner terms describe conditions for organisational access to reference data and related services. They reserve eligibility and suspension powers and constrain use, security and reporting. The acquired public text also contains conflicting legal identifiers and unfinished clauses, while the separate data-sharing agreement was not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Published access instrument defining proposed partner duties and operator controls",
        "significance": "The terms expose the contractual mechanism through which a reference custodian can govern recipients: credentials, permitted use, review and termination. Their drafting defects matter because exact purposes and deadlines determine what a partner is agreeing to. The text cannot safely substitute for an executed, complete participant agreement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Substantive restrictions with unresolved drafting",
            "text": "The document prohibits credential sharing, resale and redistribution. Its model-training exception is confined to implementing the agreed purpose on the partner's platform, with that purpose dependent on the missing data-sharing agreement. It specifies credential-compromise notice within 24 hours, general incident notice within 48 hours and annual summaries within 60 days of the anniversary. Other periods remain bracketed, including implementation and termination certification. Conflicting company and charity identifiers, an empty hash definition and undefined-purpose wording remain unresolved; they do not justify merging the named legal entities.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-published",
              "w28-access-e-terms-eligibility",
              "w28-access-e-terms-use",
              "w28-access-e-terms-security",
              "w28-access-e-terms-termination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Credential compromise notice24hours; schedule general incidents48hours; annual summaries within60days of anniversary. Security assessments/caching/incremental retrieval described. [30]implementation and [5]termination certification periods remain unfinished, not settled clocks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-security"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies scoped incident and implementation reporting",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Personal organizational credentials/no third-party sharing; redistribution/resale prohibited. Training exception is strictly for implementing agreed purpose on partner platform. Purpose comes from not obtained DSA; neither total training ban nor general training/data licence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "restricts credentials, redistribution and model training",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Introduction company5589479/charities1120354,SC051351 contrasts definition03948864/1099649. Empty hash definition, undefined-purpose terminology and bracketed periods remain. No legal entity is merged based on those erroneous/conflicting fields.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "posts an access instrument with unresolved drafting and identity conflicts",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Posted criteria cover need, security, implementation, compliance and reputational/ethical/legal risk; sole-discretion/no-reasons refusal and continued eligibility review. Not an actual refusal, signed contract or unlimited lawful discretion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-eligibility"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reserves vetting, reverification and access-suspension powers",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Termination grounds depend on not obtained DSA; cessation/destruction/certification specified with unfinished [5]business-day number. Separate from public-user hash withdrawal or restoration of content.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-terms-termination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
                "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires cessation and deletion on partner termination",
            "sourceName": "Posted StopNCII partner terms / missing DSA",
            "targetName": "StopNCII recipient platform — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
      "label": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Applicant/business-official data, not depicted users. Human adverse-result consideration and narrow challenge commitments, not universal refusal appeal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
        "name": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Applicant/business-official data, not depicted users. Human adverse-result consideration and narrow challenge commitments, not universal refusal appeal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Applicant/business-official data, not depicted users. Human adverse-result consideration and narrow challenge commitments, not universal refusal appeal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is SWGfL's published business-screening and challenge process for partner applicants and their representatives. It concerns organisational admission checks, including business verification, sanctions and adverse-media screening. It is separate from identity verification of people depicted in intimate images.",
        "structuralRole": "Administrative screening gate for organisations seeking programme access",
        "significance": "Screening determines who may become a trusted institutional participant in a sensitive data-sharing environment. The human-review and challenge provisions identify an accountability route for adverse screening results, while the named vendors and retention descriptions show where applicant information is processed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Review and correction commitments",
            "text": "SWGfL's privacy notice names Deloitte LLP for business verification and Neterium for sanctions and adverse-media checks, describing them as separate controllers. Adverse results receive human contextual review rather than solely automated refusal. Where screening informs an adverse decision, the notice offers review by someone uninvolved, correction or annotation, and vendor correction, with acknowledgement within two working days and a response within thirty. These are published commitments for the specified screening process, not a universal admission appeal or measured performance. Vendor in-memory processing and SWGfL's longer records retention are distinct.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-admin",
              "w28-access-e-screen-deloitte",
              "w28-access-e-screen-neterium"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Adverse screening results receive human context review; not solely automated refusal. Where screening informs an adverse decision, uninvolved review, correction/annotation and vendor correction are offered; acknowledgment2workingdays,response30workingdays. Not universal admission appeal or observed performance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-admin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes human screening review and narrow challenge commitments",
            "sourceName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "targetName": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Separate-controller description; concerns applicant representatives/officials. Vendor in-memory processing representation differs from SWGfL relationship-plus3years or unsuccessful3years records.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-neterium"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Neterium — applicant screening service",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names sanctions and adverse-media screening",
            "sourceName": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "targetName": "Neterium — applicant screening service",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SWGfL notice describes Deloitte LLP as separate controller for applicant-business checks. This is not depicted-user identity verification or an vendor contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-deloitte"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Deloitte LLP — applicant verifier",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names a business-verification and process provider",
            "sourceName": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "targetName": "Deloitte LLP — applicant verifier",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-deloitte",
      "label": "Deloitte LLP — applicant verifier",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named business-verification/process actor in SWGfL notice, represented as separate controller; no vendor contract acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-deloitte",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-deloitte",
        "name": "Deloitte LLP — applicant verifier",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Named business-verification/process actor in SWGfL notice, represented as separate controller; no vendor contract acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named business-verification/process actor in SWGfL notice, represented as separate controller; no vendor contract acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named business-verification/process actor in SWGfL notice, represented as separate controller; no vendor contract acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SWGfL notice describes Deloitte LLP as separate controller for applicant-business checks. This is not depicted-user identity verification or an vendor contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-deloitte"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names a business-verification and process provider",
            "sourceName": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "targetName": "Deloitte LLP — applicant verifier",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-neterium",
      "label": "Neterium — applicant screening service",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named sanctions/PEP/watchlist/adverse-media screen; vendor legal contract/individual decisions not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-neterium",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-neterium",
        "name": "Neterium — applicant screening service",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Named sanctions/PEP/watchlist/adverse-media screen; vendor legal contract/individual decisions not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named sanctions/PEP/watchlist/adverse-media screen; vendor legal contract/individual decisions not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named sanctions/PEP/watchlist/adverse-media screen; vendor legal contract/individual decisions not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Separate-controller description; concerns applicant representatives/officials. Vendor in-memory processing representation differs from SWGfL relationship-plus3years or unsuccessful3years records.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-screen-neterium"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "names sanctions and adverse-media screening",
            "sourceName": "Partner business screening / challenge process",
            "targetName": "Neterium — applicant screening service",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-pershing-fund",
      "label": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Accounts fund label earmarked for StopNCII. No automatic match to Pershing Square Foundation or other legal donor.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-pershing-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-pershing-fund",
        "name": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Accounts fund label earmarked for StopNCII. No automatic match to Pershing Square Foundation or other legal donor.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Accounts fund label earmarked for StopNCII. No automatic match to Pershing Square Foundation or other legal donor."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Accounts fund label earmarked for StopNCII. No automatic match to Pershing Square Foundation or other legal donor.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Pershing Grant FY2025£75802 and FY2024comparative£78847 each matched by expense with zero opening/closing restricted balance. Legal donor unresolved; accounting recognition, not bank cash or full StopNCII budget.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-pershing-income"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is recorded as restricted incoming and expended resources",
            "sourceName": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Note19purpose names StopNCII support. No executed grant, donor rights, programme cost centre or full funding allocation acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-pershing-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has an accounts purpose expressly supporting StopNCII",
            "sourceName": "Pershing Grant — legal donor unresolved",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-karuna-nain",
      "label": "Karuna Nain",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "SWGfL trustee/director; operator biography describes former Meta safety-policy role and launch collaboration. No Meta-nominated seat established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-karuna-nain",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-karuna-nain",
        "name": "Karuna Nain",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "SWGfL trustee/director; operator biography describes former Meta safety-policy role and launch collaboration. No Meta-nominated seat established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "SWGfL trustee/director; operator biography describes former Meta safety-policy role and launch collaboration. No Meta-nominated seat established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Karuna Nain is a SWGfL trustee and director whose appointment is recorded as 3 April 2024. The operator's biography describes her former Meta safety-policy role and work with SWGfL on the StopNCII launch, providing a professional link between a platform company and the charity.",
        "structuralRole": "Individual governance participant with prior platform-policy and programme-launch experience",
        "significance": "Her trajectory brings relevant product and policy experience into the operator's governance. It also gives a concrete personnel connection to examine alongside Meta's separate technical and financial relationships. The biography does not make her seat Meta-owned or establish that a former employer can instruct the charity.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Appointment and biography are different evidence",
            "text": "The director appointment was filed on 26 April 2024, while the current About page supplies the trustee description and professional background. SWGfL's articles place appointment and management rights with its trustees and corporate members. The retained sources do not contain Nain's appointment resolution, a donor nomination provision or a recorded decision in which she exercised programme-specific authority. The supported account is a named appointment and relevant experience, without an inferred funder veto.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nain-trustee",
              "w28-access-e-nain-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Appointment3April2024 filed26April; current About lists trustee. Underlying appointment resolution and donor nomination not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nain-trustee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "has a filed director appointment and current trustee role",
            "sourceName": "Karuna Nain",
            "targetName": "SWGfL trustees / corporate members",
            "date": "2024-04-03 – 2024-04-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Operator biography describes former Meta role and work with SWGfL on StopNCII launch. Employment affiliation is not an employer-reserved trustee seat or funder veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nain-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
                "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as a former safety-policy employee",
            "sourceName": "Karuna Nain",
            "targetName": "Meta",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-fsc",
      "label": "Free Speech Coalition",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Industry association advocates StopNCII adoption, including payment-partner credibility. No bank instruction established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-fsc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-fsc",
        "name": "Free Speech Coalition",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Industry association advocates StopNCII adoption, including payment-partner credibility. No bank instruction established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Industry association advocates StopNCII adoption, including payment-partner credibility. No bank instruction established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
            "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Industry association advocates StopNCII adoption, including payment-partner credibility. No bank instruction established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FSC26February2026article invokes legal/reputational risk and banks/processors. Industry advocacy, not bank instruction, payment disconnection or independently confirmed named-adopter counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-fsc-promotes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
                "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "StopNCII",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advocates adoption partly for payment-partner credibility",
            "sourceName": "Free Speech Coalition",
            "targetName": "StopNCII",
            "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
            "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
            "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "Nominet UK",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company 03203859, limited by guarantee. Registry and DNS business plus accumulated reserves support public-benefit commitments; membership is not shareholder profit entitlement. FY 2025 is the inspected financial snapshot; FY 2026 content remains not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-nominet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-nominet",
        "name": "Nominet UK",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Company 03203859, limited by guarantee. Registry and DNS business plus accumulated reserves support public-benefit commitments; membership is not shareholder profit entitlement. FY 2025 is the inspected financial snapshot; FY 2026 content remains not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company 03203859, limited by guarantee. Registry and DNS business plus accumulated reserves support public-benefit commitments; membership is not shareholder profit entitlement. FY 2025 is the inspected financial snapshot; FY 2026 content remains not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
            "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet corporate governance and legal identity",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/corporate-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2026 report — content unacquired",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Annual-Report-and-Financial-Statements-2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 23
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nominet UK is a company limited by guarantee with registry and DNS businesses and a public-benefit programme. The retained FY 2025 accounts and governance documents explain its resources and decision structure; it is not a shareholder-owned grant pass-through.",
        "structuralRole": "Domain infrastructure that also funds public-benefit work",
        "significance": "Nominet connects two forms of institutional power: registry operations affecting domain access, and financial support for internet-safety programmes. Board rules, trading income, reserves, grants and suspension procedures identify distinct decisions within that structure.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "SWGfL Note19 records Nominet grant income and expenditure of GBP 773,395 in FY 2025, zero opening/closing restricted balance, and expressly states UKSIC consortium-operation purpose. FY 2024 comparative income was GBP 842,780. Recognition requires entitlement, relevant performance conditions, probable receipt and measurement; these are not bank receipts or a donor acceptance certificate. Pershing/StopNCII remains a separate purpose. Financial details: value: 773,395; currency: GBP; kind: SWGfL recognized Nominet restricted-grant income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-swgfl-recognition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as the source of a recognized UKSIC grant",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The up-to-GBP 65m commitment dates to 2021. FY 2025 Group revenue comprised registry GBP 40.147m and DNS GBP 15.750m; registry revenue is not exclusively established as .uk fees. Trading operating profit GBP 5.463m, public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m and investment assets GBP 88.6m are distinct flow/stock measures. No simple same-year surplus-to-charities pass-through is established. Financial details: value: 65,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: up-to public-benefit commitment; reserves or annual surplus; period: Commitment made in 2021; not a one-year disbursement",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-mixed-resources"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes commitments funded from reserves or annual surplus",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
            "date": "Commitment reported as made in 2021; financial snapshot is year ended 31 March 2025, not FY 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IWF reports GBP 568,707 UKSIC fund income, GBP 593,101 expenditure and GBP 24,394 transfer from unrestricted funds; opening/closing balances are zero. Note18c expressly says the grant comes from Nominet and states no unfulfilled conditions relating to amounts recognized that year. This positive recognition assertion is narrower than acceptance of every programme deliverable or proof of bank cash. Financial details: value: 568,707; currency: GBP; kind: IWF recognized Nominet UKSIC fund income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-recognition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was explicitly named as funder of the UKSIC Hotline grant",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IWF Note3 reports GBP 226,352 technical-project grant income; Note18a reports GBP 226,351 for the corresponding fund. Both tables were visually checked. The GBP 1 discrepancy remains unreconciled and both figures remain outside the UKSIC comparison. The operator’s IntelliGrade capability narrative is not assigned to the UKSIC Hotline grant or treated as independently verified removals. Financial details: value: 226,352; currency: GBP; kind: technical grant income in Note3; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-technical"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF Nominet technical-project fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named in separate technical-project grant accounting",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "IWF Nominet technical-project fund",
            "date": "FY 2025 original accounting tables; no corrected figure or cause acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FY 2025 programme expense GBP 10.585m includes GBP 1.6m transferred to Nominet’s CAF account for distribution in FY 2026/27; GBP 0.394m operating costs bring total public-benefit expense to GBP 10.979m. The grants table excludes the new CAF transfer. This is an intermediate custody/accounting step, not an extra UKSIC beneficiary payment. Financial details: value: 1,600,000; currency: GBP; kind: transfer to donor CAF account; onward distribution later; period: FY2025 transfer for FY2026/27 distribution",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-caf-transfer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet's CAF distribution account",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported a transfer into its own account for later distribution",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet's CAF distribution account",
            "date": "Reporting period; exact transfer day not acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Donor tables report GBP 1,599,000 for FY 2024 and GBP 1,647,000 for FY 2025. These annual amounts are neither SWGfL-only payments nor extra awards to add to the GBP 5.1m aggregate pledge. FY 2025 excludes the GBP 1.6m CAF transfer. Recipient allocation, shared recognition basis and beneficiary bank cash are not established by the tables. Financial details: value: 1,647,000; currency: GBP; kind: donor UKSIC grants-table amount; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-annual"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported UKSIC amounts in annual grant tables",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Two financial reporting periods, not exact payment dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The dedicated UKSIC section specifies liaison through consortium partners, particularly the Secretariat, on financial returns/reports to Nominet; communications with subcontractors/evaluators Nominet identifies; and IWF obligation coordination. Quarterly progress reports go to IWF Senior Leadership Team. No named evaluator appointment, delivered return, donor acceptance or publication veto was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-iwf-nominet-reporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was assigned financial-return liaison and funder-identified evaluator communication",
            "sourceName": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": "Recruitment specification in early 2022, not an executed or currently verified grant schedule."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The published report identifies Nominet commissioning/funding and input to design, while Childnet leads study design. No amount, executed brief, precise cash dates, changed question, final approval right or publication veto was acquired. This later commission is not established as a renewal or drawdown of the GBP 5.1m pledge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-research-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned and funded research with disclosed design input",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "date": "2026 report; exact commission date not obtained, January URL directory is not a verified publication day."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
            "title": "Nominet exercised domain action: reported requests and reversals",
            "heading": "Requests, decisions and implementation",
            "text": "Both one-page reports and the2025 spread depict agencies notifying Nominet, Nominet making administrative checks, and Nominet notifying the registrant and working with the registrar to suspend the domain. That is their summary of the law-enforcement process; it does not prove IWF is a law-enforcement agency or that its requests use every step of that route. Current eligibility, discretion and challenge rules must come from the parallel policy packet. The named examples in the reports belong to Domain Watch phishing categories, not the IWF case path.",
            "matched": [
              "Nominet UK"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8da018726c459ef6975e15e99e77fcb3a08b1f54d773507712b618dd014cc63c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
            "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet corporate governance and legal identity",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/corporate-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2026 report — content unacquired",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Annual-Report-and-Financial-Statements-2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
            "title": "Nominet exercised domain action: reported requests and reversals"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          },
          {
            "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
            "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Nominet UK operates domain-registry and DNS infrastructure and uses reserves and trading resources to support public-benefit work. It appears here both as a funder of online-safety services and as an institution whose policies can interrupt access through domain suspension.",
          "structuralRole": "Domain access powers alongside substantial internet-safety grantmaking",
          "significance": "Nominet combines a technical access point with a funding role. Its registry rules determine how certain website addresses can be suspended, while its grants sustain services involved in safety education, reporting and assessment. Both functions deserve visible treatment.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Nominet UK is a company limited by guarantee whose business includes domain-registry and DNS services. Its board manages the company's affairs and property. That governance sits behind two substantial roles in this investigation: maintaining internet infrastructure and funding public-benefit programmes. The same organization can therefore appear on both the resource side and the implementation side of a safety initiative.",
            "Its 2025 accounts show the scale of that capacity: registry revenue of about £40.1 million, DNS revenue of about £15.8 million and investment assets of £88.6 million. In 2021 it committed up to £65 million for public-benefit work, drawing on reserves or annual surplus. A £5.1 million three-year pledge supported the UK Safer Internet Centre after the loss of EU support. The 2025 annual grant table records £1.647 million for that programme.",
            "The recipients include practical services. SWGfL and the Internet Watch Foundation both identify Nominet-funded UK Safer Internet Centre work in their accounts. Reporting arrangements connected programme staff, financial returns and funder-identified evaluators. Nominet later said the three-year grant ended in its existing form in March 2025 while describing continued support and joint work. The funding relationship has therefore changed over time.",
            "Separately, Nominet's July 2026 criminal-practices policy provides for suspension or redirection after certification through listed agencies. A suspended domain can stop an ordinary visitor reaching a site even while its hosted material remains elsewhere. Published activity reports include suspensions, decisions not to suspend and reversals. Nominet's importance is concrete: it supplies resources to safety work and controls an address-level mechanism through which enforcement requests can have immediate practical effect."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
              "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
              "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
              "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
              "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
              "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-nominet-members",
      "label": "Nominet corporate members",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Members elect up to four non-executive directors and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives under article 30. Current-linked dated poll rules weight commercial domain involvement; current weights and exercised grant influence were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-nominet-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-nominet-members",
        "name": "Nominet corporate members",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Members elect up to four non-executive directors and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives under article 30. Current-linked dated poll rules weight commercial domain involvement; current weights and exercised grant influence were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Members elect up to four non-executive directors and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives under article 30. Current-linked dated poll rules weight commercial domain involvement; current weights and exercised grant influence were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Members elect up to four non-executive directors and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives under article 30. Current-linked dated poll rules weight commercial domain involvement; current weights and exercised grant influence were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Members elect up to four NEDs. The Board may appoint up to four additional NEDs, who must seek member reappointment at the following AGM and periodically thereafter under article 30; executives are separate. The current-linked dated by-law allocates 25% of poll votes equally and 75% by paid-for domains, subject to caps/connected-party rules. No current weight register, actual decisive ballot or registrar grant instruction acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-member-governance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "elect some non-executives and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives",
            "sourceName": "Nominet corporate members",
            "targetName": "Nominet Board",
            "date": "Articles amended 22 September 2020 and linked at observation; dated voting rules are not verified terms for every later ballot."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-nominet-board",
      "label": "Nominet Board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Controls company affairs/property and may delegate under conditions it can change or revoke. Former Public Benefit Committee work moved to the main Board. General authority does not identify a specific UKSIC approval vote.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-nominet-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-nominet-board",
        "name": "Nominet Board",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Controls company affairs/property and may delegate under conditions it can change or revoke. Former Public Benefit Committee work moved to the main Board. General authority does not identify a specific UKSIC approval vote.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Controls company affairs/property and may delegate under conditions it can change or revoke. Former Public Benefit Committee work moved to the main Board. General authority does not identify a specific UKSIC approval vote."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Controls company affairs/property and may delegate under conditions it can change or revoke. Former Public Benefit Committee work moved to the main Board. General authority does not identify a specific UKSIC approval vote.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY 2025 reporting places former Public Benefit Committee work with the main Board and accrues initiatives against Board-agreed commitments. Partner engagement covers alignment, goals, delivered-result measurement and periodic external review; stated future alignment includes the business, government stakeholders and DNS ecosystem. This establishes an institutional review route, not a specific grant vote or UKSIC publication-clearance right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-board-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "oversees strategic alignment and agrees programme commitments",
            "sourceName": "Nominet Board",
            "targetName": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
            "date": "FY 2025 report snapshot; no current public-benefit budget or UKSIC minute acquired."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Members elect up to four NEDs. The Board may appoint up to four additional NEDs, who must seek member reappointment at the following AGM and periodically thereafter under article 30; executives are separate. The current-linked dated by-law allocates 25% of poll votes equally and 75% by paid-for domains, subject to caps/connected-party rules. No current weight register, actual decisive ballot or registrar grant instruction acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-member-governance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet corporate members",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "elect some non-executives and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives",
            "sourceName": "Nominet corporate members",
            "targetName": "Nominet Board",
            "date": "Articles amended 22 September 2020 and linked at observation; dated voting rules are not verified terms for every later ballot."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Articles 35–42 assign Board management, meeting/conflict rules and delegation powers it may alter or revoke. Article 43 registry-policy consultation is not a general member right to approve grants. No particular UKSIC approval vote or delegated spending limit acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-board-management"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "controls affairs and property and may condition delegation",
            "sourceName": "Nominet Board",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": "Current-linked adopted 2020 articles; no exercised grant decision observed."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights",
            "heading": "Mechanism and competing interpretation",
            "text": "The supported path is business income plus accumulated reserves → Nominet Board resource decisions → programme commitments/distribution arrangements → recipient work . A second path is commercially weighted member votes → some director appointments → Board oversight . These should remain distinct: neither proves that large registrars ordered a specific grant or that receiving a grant surrendered editorial discretion.",
            "matched": [
              "Nominet Board"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4ec0c95d62d76e38884c08b4ea27c79b0d24e8e3a5fe96dde6a5c8968bb2ddd6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
      "label": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Up to GBP 65m committed in 2021 could use reserves or annual surplus. FY 2025 public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m exceeded trading operating profit GBP 5.463m. Programme expense, beneficiary grants, CAF transfers and cash are different accounting states.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
        "name": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
        "role": "Funding programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Up to GBP 65m committed in 2021 could use reserves or annual surplus. FY 2025 public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m exceeded trading operating profit GBP 5.463m. Programme expense, beneficiary grants, CAF transfers and cash are different accounting states.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Up to GBP 65m committed in 2021 could use reserves or annual surplus. FY 2025 public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m exceeded trading operating profit GBP 5.463m. Programme expense, beneficiary grants, CAF transfers and cash are different accounting states."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Up to GBP 65m committed in 2021 could use reserves or annual surplus. FY 2025 public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m exceeded trading operating profit GBP 5.463m. Programme expense, beneficiary grants, CAF transfers and cash are different accounting states.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The up-to-GBP 65m commitment dates to 2021. FY 2025 Group revenue comprised registry GBP 40.147m and DNS GBP 15.750m; registry revenue is not exclusively established as .uk fees. Trading operating profit GBP 5.463m, public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m and investment assets GBP 88.6m are distinct flow/stock measures. No simple same-year surplus-to-charities pass-through is established. Financial details: value: 65,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: up-to public-benefit commitment; reserves or annual surplus; period: Commitment made in 2021; not a one-year disbursement",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-mixed-resources"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes commitments funded from reserves or annual surplus",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
            "date": "Commitment reported as made in 2021; financial snapshot is year ended 31 March 2025, not FY 2026."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY 2025 reporting places former Public Benefit Committee work with the main Board and accrues initiatives against Board-agreed commitments. Partner engagement covers alignment, goals, delivered-result measurement and periodic external review; stated future alignment includes the business, government stakeholders and DNS ecosystem. This establishes an institutional review route, not a specific grant vote or UKSIC publication-clearance right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-board-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "oversees strategic alignment and agrees programme commitments",
            "sourceName": "Nominet Board",
            "targetName": "Nominet public-benefit commitments",
            "date": "FY 2025 report snapshot; no current public-benefit budget or UKSIC minute acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-caf-account",
      "label": "Nominet's CAF distribution account",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Account described as Nominet’s own CAF account in FY2025 reporting: GBP 1.6m transferred for onward distribution in FY 2026/27. The UKSIC grant table excludes this transfer; it is not an additional UKSIC beneficiary payment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Account"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-caf-account",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-caf-account",
        "name": "Nominet's CAF distribution account",
        "role": "Account",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Account described as Nominet’s own CAF account in FY2025 reporting: GBP 1.6m transferred for onward distribution in FY 2026/27. The UKSIC grant table excludes this transfer; it is not an additional UKSIC beneficiary payment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Account described as Nominet’s own CAF account in FY2025 reporting: GBP 1.6m transferred for onward distribution in FY 2026/27. The UKSIC grant table excludes this transfer; it is not an additional UKSIC beneficiary payment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Account described as Nominet’s own CAF account in FY2025 reporting: GBP 1.6m transferred for onward distribution in FY 2026/27. The UKSIC grant table excludes this transfer; it is not an additional UKSIC beneficiary payment.",
        "structuralRole": "Account",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FY 2025 programme expense GBP 10.585m includes GBP 1.6m transferred to Nominet’s CAF account for distribution in FY 2026/27; GBP 0.394m operating costs bring total public-benefit expense to GBP 10.979m. The grants table excludes the new CAF transfer. This is an intermediate custody/accounting step, not an extra UKSIC beneficiary payment. Financial details: value: 1,600,000; currency: GBP; kind: transfer to donor CAF account; onward distribution later; period: FY2025 transfer for FY2026/27 distribution",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-caf-transfer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported a transfer into its own account for later distribution",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet's CAF distribution account",
            "date": "Reporting period; exact transfer day not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Consortium of Childnet, Internet Watch Foundation and SWGfL in the 2021 donor announcement. Keep consortium grant totals separate from each charity, its other Nominet programmes and recipient restricted-fund recognition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Consortium"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-uksic",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-uksic",
        "name": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
        "role": "Consortium",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Consortium of Childnet, Internet Watch Foundation and SWGfL in the 2021 donor announcement. Keep consortium grant totals separate from each charity, its other Nominet programmes and recipient restricted-fund recognition.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Consortium of Childnet, Internet Watch Foundation and SWGfL in the 2021 donor announcement. Keep consortium grant totals separate from each charity, its other Nominet programmes and recipient restricted-fund recognition."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK Safer Internet Centre is a consortium of Childnet, the Internet Watch Foundation and SWGfL. The retained records describe joint safer-internet projects, a formal partnership agreement and Nominet support, connecting education, reporting and safety-service organisations through a shared programme rather than merging them into one charity.",
        "structuralRole": "Three-charity consortium pooling public-facing safety work and programme resources",
        "significance": "UKSIC provides a collective route for funding and delivery across organisations with different functions. Consortium totals cannot reveal how much each partner receives or spends. The formal agreement is therefore consequential for understanding allocation, administration and approval, while each charity's accounts remain a separate view.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Pledge, annual amounts and programme boundary",
            "text": "Nominet announced a GBP5.1 million three-year pledge in October 2021. Its annual tables report GBP1.599 million for 2023/24 and GBP1.647 million for 2024/25; these are not extra awards to add to the pledge or SWGfL-only payments. A 2025 retrospective pairs the programme's end with language about continuing support without a renewed amount or schedule. Childnet's report discloses a formal agreement with the other two partners and describes its role as part-funded by Nominet. The agreement text and recipient allocation were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-annual",
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-purpose",
              "w28-access-e-nominet-continuing-support",
              "w28-access-e-nominet-sid2022-commitment",
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-purpose",
              "w28-access-e-childnet-uksic-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The row records GBP 437,106 income, GBP 546,529 expenditure and GBP 109,423 transferred into the fund, with zero opening/closing balances. Trustees describe the UKSIC role as part-funded by Nominet; the inspected passages do not establish that the row’s entire income is the Nominet grant. Grants use receivable/accrual recognition. Other restricted charitable income and the separate Enhance fund cannot be used to solve the comparison without allocation records. Financial details: value: 437,106; currency: GBP; kind: Childnet Nominet UKSIC9 fund income; complete composition unestablished; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-uksic-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Childnet",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported income and expenditure in its Nominet UKSIC 9 restricted fund",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Recipient accounting period; underlying income composition and cash dates not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Donor tables report GBP 1,599,000 for FY 2024 and GBP 1,647,000 for FY 2025. These annual amounts are neither SWGfL-only payments nor extra awards to add to the GBP 5.1m aggregate pledge. FY 2025 excludes the GBP 1.6m CAF transfer. Recipient allocation, shared recognition basis and beneficiary bank cash are not established by the tables. Financial details: value: 1,647,000; currency: GBP; kind: donor UKSIC grants-table amount; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-annual"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported UKSIC amounts in annual grant tables",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Two financial reporting periods, not exact payment dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The January 2022 announcement reports a GBP 250,000 commitment made before the October 2021 pledge. Precise commitment day, payment and consolidated reconciliation remain not obtained; do not mechanically add this named commitment to annual UKSIC amounts. Financial details: value: 250,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported Safer Internet Day commitment, not verified payment; period: Safer Internet Day 2022; commitment predates October 2021 pledge",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-sid2022-commitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a separate earlier commitment for Safer Internet Day 2022",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Reported 25 January 2022; commitment described as preceding October 2021, not made on publication day."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The same retrospective pairs the programme end with continued-support language. It supplies no renewed grant amount, contractual extension, post-March allocation or award schedule; later commissioned research remains a separate relationship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-continuing-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "stated that support and joint work would continue",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "2025 retrospective; exact future-support term not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "This agreement-existence disclosure provides a concrete next instrument. Signed scope, financial allocation, delegated administration and change/acceptance terms remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as covering consortium projects",
            "sourceName": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The donor names IWF, Childnet and SWGfL as UKSIC partners. The aggregate pledge does not establish equal instalments or allocation among recipients.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as funding the three-charity consortium",
            "sourceName": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Three-year scope announced October 2021; precise funded-period boundaries not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-childnet",
      "label": "Childnet",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Company 03958416, charity 1080173. Recipient accounts identify a UKSIC partnership role part-funded by Nominet; the complete composition of its Nominet UKSIC 9 fund income remains unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-childnet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-childnet",
        "name": "Childnet",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Company 03958416, charity 1080173. Recipient accounts identify a UKSIC partnership role part-funded by Nominet; the complete composition of its Nominet UKSIC 9 fund income remains unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Company 03958416, charity 1080173. Recipient accounts identify a UKSIC partnership role part-funded by Nominet; the complete composition of its Nominet UKSIC 9 fund income remains unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet Companies House legal identity",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Childnet is UK company 03958416 and charity 1080173, a partner in the UK Safer Internet Centre alongside SWGfL and the Internet Watch Foundation. Its work in the retained record includes educational resources, Safer Internet Day activity and leading the design of associated research with Nominet input.",
        "structuralRole": "Educational and research-design partner delivering consortium activity",
        "significance": "Childnet connects programme funding with material used by schools, young people and supporting organisations. Its accounts and trustees' report give an internal view of delivery and controls, while the study-design attribution identifies a concrete role in shaping what questions are asked and how evidence is gathered.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Resources, reported outputs and internal approvals",
            "text": "Its 2024/25 restricted Nominet UKSIC 9 fund records GBP437,106 income, GBP546,529 expenditure and GBP109,423 transferred in, with no opening or closing balance; the full income composition is not established as Nominet's grant alone. The trustees report more than 1,700 supporting organisations, almost 160,000 resource downloads and over 86,000 quiz uses around Safer Internet Day 2025, crediting several funders. Formal partnerships require trustee approval before signature, while daily authority sits with management under the budget. These are reported outputs and controls, not independently audited impact.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              },
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-consortium-agreement",
              "w28-access-e-childnet-uksic-fund",
              "w28-access-e-childnet-sid2025-delivery",
              "w28-access-e-childnet-research-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The row records GBP 437,106 income, GBP 546,529 expenditure and GBP 109,423 transferred into the fund, with zero opening/closing balances. Trustees describe the UKSIC role as part-funded by Nominet; the inspected passages do not establish that the row’s entire income is the Nominet grant. Grants use receivable/accrual recognition. Other restricted charitable income and the separate Enhance fund cannot be used to solve the comparison without allocation records. Financial details: value: 437,106; currency: GBP; kind: Childnet Nominet UKSIC9 fund income; complete composition unestablished; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-uksic-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported income and expenditure in its Nominet UKSIC 9 restricted fund",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Recipient accounting period; underlying income composition and cash dates not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The method block assigns design lead to Childnet with Nominet input; Childnet also ran youth-group consultations and school focus groups. This supports stated roles, not an independent validity audit or a determination of final approval rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-research-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as the lead for study design",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "date": "School focus groups reported May–June 2025 and youth consultations November–December 2025; precise days not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Childnet says it has a formal UKSIC agreement with SWGfL and IWF and that trustees review/approve formal partnerships and major contracts before signature. CEO/Business Manager exercise daily authority under plan/budget, with payments above GBP 3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls, not a signed agreement, observed approval minute or Nominet reserved right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-consortium-agreement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a formal partnership and a trustee pre-signature approval route",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "date": "FY 2025 trustees report approved 17 December 2025; actual agreement and approval dates not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The trustees narrative reports more than 1,700 registered supporting organizations, almost 160,000 resource downloads and over 86,000 quiz uses. It credits Nominet alongside other funders. These are recipient-reported outputs, not independently audited impact, accepted grant deliverables or exclusively Nominet-caused results; mixed-year survey percentages are not imported.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-sid2025-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safer Internet Day — 11 February 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported activity delivered with support from Nominet and other funders",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day — 11 February 2025",
            "date": "Safer Internet Day event date; aggregate activity-count periods are not independently reconstructed."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery",
            "heading": "A disclosed agreement and an accountable internal route",
            "text": "Childnet's trustees' report gives a concrete next instrument. PDF 12/printed 10 says it has a formal partnership agreement with SWGfL and IWF for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. The same page says trustees review and approve formal partnerships and major contractual relationships before signature. Day-to-day authority sits with the CEO and Business Manager under the annual business plan and budget, with payments above £3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls and an agreement-existence disclosure, not the agreement's text, an observed approval minute or a Nominet reserved right.",
            "matched": [
              "Childnet"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1e44b5a4777d0f8b0fc224cb0e15352dda48628c7cc17aac26b3df7cd3da6dfc"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery",
            "heading": "Delivery and the March 2025 boundary",
            "text": "Childnet reports Safer Internet Day on 11 February 2025 , over 1,700 registered supporting organisations, almost 160,000 educational-resource downloads and more than 86,000 quiz uses (PDF 8/printed 6). It explicitly credits Nominet support alongside other funders. This supports a reported delivery relationship, without attributing all outputs or costs exclusively to Nominet. The same page's survey-evaluation prose mixes 2024 and 2025 references; its percentage results are not relied on here. The auditors' report, PDF 16–17/printed 14–15, gives the financial-statements opinion and expressly distinguishes other annual-report information, so the delivery narrative is not independently audited impact evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Childnet"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c46d758636f0c2ac1097fdc852caf2b621f6433dbd0b4b9c80e6a713a5081b8d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet Companies House legal identity",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
      "label": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GBP 5.1m pledge announced 29 October 2021, intended to replace lost EU support. Retrospective says the three-year grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form. Exact commencement, instalment, allocation and renewal instruments were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
        "name": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
        "role": "Funding programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "GBP 5.1m pledge announced 29 October 2021, intended to replace lost EU support. Retrospective says the three-year grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form. Exact commencement, instalment, allocation and renewal instruments were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GBP 5.1m pledge announced 29 October 2021, intended to replace lost EU support. Retrospective says the three-year grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form. Exact commencement, instalment, allocation and renewal instruments were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GBP 5.1m pledge announced 29 October 2021, intended to replace lost EU support. Retrospective says the three-year grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form. Exact commencement, instalment, allocation and renewal instruments were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The announcement describes a pledge intended to replace lost EU support, despite its receives-funding headline. No executed award, installment schedule, recipient allocation or completed payment acquired. Separate Childnet Digital Leaders+, SWGfL Project Evolve and IWF Countering Harm support must not be silently included. Financial details: value: 5,100,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pledge over three years; period: Announced 29 October 2021",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-pledge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced a GBP 5.1m three-year pledge",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
            "date": "Announcement date; exact programme commencement not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The 2025 retrospective explicitly describes the three-year grant ending in March and the partnership ending in its existing form. This does not establish default, breach, exercise of a termination right, automatic renewal or cessation of all support.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-programme-end"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported that the grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
            "date": "March 2025 inferred from edition context; no exact termination day asserted."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The donor names IWF, Childnet and SWGfL as UKSIC partners. The aggregate pledge does not establish equal instalments or allocation among recipients.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as funding the three-charity consortium",
            "sourceName": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC three-year pledge",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": "Three-year scope announced October 2021; precise funded-period boundaries not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
      "label": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Childnet trustees report a formal agreement with SWGfL and IWF for UKSIC projects. This is an agreement-existence disclosure, not signed text or a grant allocation/approval schedule.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Agreement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
        "name": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
        "role": "Agreement",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Childnet trustees report a formal agreement with SWGfL and IWF for UKSIC projects. This is an agreement-existence disclosure, not signed text or a grant allocation/approval schedule.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Childnet trustees report a formal agreement with SWGfL and IWF for UKSIC projects. This is an agreement-existence disclosure, not signed text or a grant allocation/approval schedule."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This node represents the formal partnership agreement that Childnet's trustees report says exists with SWGfL and the Internet Watch Foundation for UK Safer Internet Centre projects. The disclosure establishes an agreement's reported existence and purpose, while the signed text itself remains unacquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported contractual framework for coordinating three charities' consortium work",
        "significance": "A consortium can share a name and programme without sharing all decision rights or money equally. Its agreement is the document that could specify allocation, administration, change control and acceptance. The current disclosure identifies the relevant parties and instrument without supplying those unobserved terms.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "An accountable internal route",
            "text": "Childnet's 2024/25 report, approved on 17 December 2025, says trustees review formal partnerships and major contractual relationships before signature. Day-to-day authority is assigned to the chief executive and business manager under the annual plan and budget, with payments above GBP3,000 additionally authorised by the chair. These reported controls do not prove a particular approval minute or grant Nominet a reserved right. The agreement's dates, financial schedule, secretariat arrangements and delegated powers are not specified in the retained disclosure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-consortium-agreement",
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-swgfl",
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-iwf",
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Childnet says it has a formal UKSIC agreement with SWGfL and IWF and that trustees review/approve formal partnerships and major contracts before signature. CEO/Business Manager exercise daily authority under plan/budget, with payments above GBP 3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls, not a signed agreement, observed approval minute or Nominet reserved right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-consortium-agreement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Childnet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a formal partnership and a trustee pre-signature approval route",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "date": "FY 2025 trustees report approved 17 December 2025; actual agreement and approval dates not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Childnet identifies SWGfL in its formal partnership for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. The agreement text and any allocation, Secretariat or acceptance rights were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-swgfl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was disclosed as including SWGfL as a partner",
            "sourceName": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "targetName": "South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "This agreement-existence disclosure provides a concrete next instrument. Signed scope, financial allocation, delegated administration and change/acceptance terms remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as covering consortium projects",
            "sourceName": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "targetName": "UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC)",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Childnet identifies IWF in its formal partnership for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. Recipient partnership membership does not confer donor editorial control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-iwf"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was disclosed as including IWF as a partner",
            "sourceName": "UKSIC formal partnership agreement — text unacquired",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
      "label": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Recruitment pack specifies financial-return/report liaison through UKSIC, communications with Nominet-identified evaluators, and quarterly progress reports to IWF leadership. No appointed person or accepted return acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
        "name": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Recruitment pack specifies financial-return/report liaison through UKSIC, communications with Nominet-identified evaluators, and quarterly progress reports to IWF leadership. No appointed person or accepted return acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recruitment pack specifies financial-return/report liaison through UKSIC, communications with Nominet-identified evaluators, and quarterly progress reports to IWF leadership. No appointed person or accepted return acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recruitment pack specifies financial-return/report liaison through UKSIC, communications with Nominet-identified evaluators, and quarterly progress reports to IWF leadership. No appointed person or accepted return acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The dedicated UKSIC section specifies liaison through consortium partners, particularly the Secretariat, on financial returns/reports to Nominet; communications with subcontractors/evaluators Nominet identifies; and IWF obligation coordination. Quarterly progress reports go to IWF Senior Leadership Team. No named evaluator appointment, delivered return, donor acceptance or publication veto was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-iwf-nominet-reporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was assigned financial-return liaison and funder-identified evaluator communication",
            "sourceName": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": "Recruitment specification in early 2022, not an executed or currently verified grant schedule."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The recruitment pack specifies a role handling IWF grant obligations. Metadata is dated 20 January 2022 and applications close 11 February 2022; neither proves exact publication date or that a person filled the role. Generic new-application approval by the Deputy CEO must not become a bespoke Nominet right.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-iwf-recruitment-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a grant-management and reporting job specification",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "IWF Project Officer grant reporting role — 2022 specification",
            "date": "Early-2022 recruitment context; no continuing staffing arrangement established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
      "label": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Public report credits Nominet commissioning/funding and design input, Childnet study-design lead and Opinium surveys. Distinct from the earlier three-year grant; no amount, signed brief, publication veto or contractual acceptance record acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-sid-research2026",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
        "name": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Public report credits Nominet commissioning/funding and design input, Childnet study-design lead and Opinium surveys. Distinct from the earlier three-year grant; no amount, signed brief, publication veto or contractual acceptance record acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public report credits Nominet commissioning/funding and design input, Childnet study-design lead and Opinium surveys. Distinct from the earlier three-year grant; no amount, signed brief, publication veto or contractual acceptance record acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public report credits Nominet commissioning/funding and design input, Childnet study-design lead and Opinium surveys. Distinct from the earlier three-year grant; no amount, signed brief, publication veto or contractual acceptance record acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The published report identifies Nominet commissioning/funding and input to design, while Childnet leads study design. No amount, executed brief, precise cash dates, changed question, final approval right or publication veto was acquired. This later commission is not established as a renewal or drawdown of the GBP 5.1m pledge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-research-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissioned and funded research with disclosed design input",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "date": "2026 report; exact commission date not obtained, January URL directory is not a verified publication day."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The method block assigns design lead to Childnet with Nominet input; Childnet also ran youth-group consultations and school focus groups. This supports stated roles, not an independent validity audit or a determination of final approval rights.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-research-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Childnet",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was identified as the lead for study design",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "date": "School focus groups reported May–June 2025 and youth consultations November–December 2025; precise days not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The report credits Opinium surveys of 2,018 children and 2,000 parents/carers. This is an attributed delivery role in a public report, not an inspected survey dataset, contractual acceptance record or full methodological validation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-opinium-research-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Opinium",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was credited with conducting the November 2025 surveys",
            "sourceName": "Opinium",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "date": "Survey month November 2025; exact fieldwork dates not obtained."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-opinium",
      "label": "Opinium",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named survey provider in the Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioning/method statement. No separate corporate-identity reconciliation or ownership claim is made.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-opinium",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-opinium",
        "name": "Opinium",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Named survey provider in the Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioning/method statement. No separate corporate-identity reconciliation or ownership claim is made.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named survey provider in the Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioning/method statement. No separate corporate-identity reconciliation or ownership claim is made."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named survey provider in the Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioning/method statement. No separate corporate-identity reconciliation or ownership claim is made.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The report credits Opinium surveys of 2,018 children and 2,000 parents/carers. This is an attributed delivery role in a public report, not an inspected survey dataset, contractual acceptance record or full methodological validation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-opinium-research-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was credited with conducting the November 2025 surveys",
            "sourceName": "Opinium",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day 2026 commissioned study",
            "date": "Survey month November 2025; exact fieldwork dates not obtained."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
            "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-iwf-nominet-technical",
      "label": "IWF Nominet technical-project fund",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Separate from the UKSIC Hotline fund. FY 2025 Note3 records GBP 226352 technical grant income; Note18a records GBP 226351 for the corresponding fund. The original tables differ by GBP 1; no cause or correction established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Restricted fund"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-iwf-nominet-technical",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-iwf-nominet-technical",
        "name": "IWF Nominet technical-project fund",
        "role": "Restricted fund",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Separate from the UKSIC Hotline fund. FY 2025 Note3 records GBP 226352 technical grant income; Note18a records GBP 226351 for the corresponding fund. The original tables differ by GBP 1; no cause or correction established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate from the UKSIC Hotline fund. FY 2025 Note3 records GBP 226352 technical grant income; Note18a records GBP 226351 for the corresponding fund. The original tables differ by GBP 1; no cause or correction established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate from the UKSIC Hotline fund. FY 2025 Note3 records GBP 226352 technical grant income; Note18a records GBP 226351 for the corresponding fund. The original tables differ by GBP 1; no cause or correction established.",
        "structuralRole": "Restricted fund",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IWF Note3 reports GBP 226,352 technical-project grant income; Note18a reports GBP 226,351 for the corresponding fund. Both tables were visually checked. The GBP 1 discrepancy remains unreconciled and both figures remain outside the UKSIC comparison. The operator’s IntelliGrade capability narrative is not assigned to the UKSIC Hotline grant or treated as independently verified removals. Financial details: value: 226,352; currency: GBP; kind: technical grant income in Note3; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-technical"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was named in separate technical-project grant accounting",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "IWF Nominet technical-project fund",
            "date": "FY 2025 original accounting tables; no corrected figure or cause acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-sid2025",
      "label": "Safer Internet Day — 11 February 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Childnet reports delivered activities and Nominet support alongside other funders. Donor-exclusive attribution and independently audited programme impact are not established by the narrative.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w28-access-sid2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-sid2025",
        "name": "Safer Internet Day — 11 February 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Childnet reports delivered activities and Nominet support alongside other funders. Donor-exclusive attribution and independently audited programme impact are not established by the narrative.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Childnet reports delivered activities and Nominet support alongside other funders. Donor-exclusive attribution and independently audited programme impact are not established by the narrative."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "reference-access-resources",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Childnet reports delivered activities and Nominet support alongside other funders. Donor-exclusive attribution and independently audited programme impact are not established by the narrative.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The trustees narrative reports more than 1,700 registered supporting organizations, almost 160,000 resource downloads and over 86,000 quiz uses. It credits Nominet alongside other funders. These are recipient-reported outputs, not independently audited impact, accepted grant deliverables or exclusively Nominet-caused results; mixed-year survey percentages are not imported.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w28-access-e-childnet-sid2025-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Childnet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported activity delivered with support from Nominet and other funders",
            "sourceName": "Childnet",
            "targetName": "Safer Internet Day — 11 February 2025",
            "date": "Safer Internet Day event date; aggregate activity-count periods are not independently reconstructed."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery",
            "heading": "Delivery and the March 2025 boundary",
            "text": "Childnet reports Safer Internet Day on 11 February 2025 , over 1,700 registered supporting organisations, almost 160,000 educational-resource downloads and more than 86,000 quiz uses (PDF 8/printed 6). It explicitly credits Nominet support alongside other funders. This supports a reported delivery relationship, without attributing all outputs or costs exclusively to Nominet. The same page's survey-evaluation prose mixes 2024 and 2025 references; its percentage results are not relied on here. The auditors' report, PDF 16–17/printed 14–15, gives the financial-statements opinion and expressly distinguishes other annual-report information, so the delivery narrative is not independently audited impact evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Safer Internet Day"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c46d758636f0c2ac1097fdc852caf2b621f6433dbd0b4b9c80e6a713a5081b8d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
            "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-cpp2026",
      "label": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy — July2026",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Posted policy dated6July2026. Listed agencies certify criminal use; Nominet checks and implements registry measures. Suspension affects domain access, not hosted-content deletion.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Administrative policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-cpp2026",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-cpp2026",
        "name": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy — July2026",
        "role": "Administrative policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Posted policy dated6July2026. Listed agencies certify criminal use; Nominet checks and implements registry measures. Suspension affects domain access, not hosted-content deletion.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Posted policy dated6July2026. Listed agencies certify criminal use; Nominet checks and implements registry measures. Suspension affects domain access, not hosted-content deletion."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Posted policy dated6July2026. Listed agencies certify criminal use; Nominet checks and implements registry measures. Suspension affects domain access, not hosted-content deletion.",
        "structuralRole": "Administrative policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ordinarily at least48hours notice before special status. Significant evidence of imminent harm permits immediate action with senior-management approval. Satisfactory prior action or agency confirmation that criminal use ended affects continuation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-notice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected domain registrant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies notice and corrective-action opportunity",
            "sourceName": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy — July2026",
            "targetName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Nominet administers the posted July2026 CPP. Criminal-use merits originate with listed agencies; an administrative check is not an independent criminal trial.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-nominet-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes and administers",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy — July2026",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-registrant-terms",
      "label": "Nominet registrant terms — March2024",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Unlawful use, discretionary serious-risk suspension and valid binding court orders are distinct grounds. Posted general terms do not establish any particular suspension or enforceability result.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contract terms"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-registrant-terms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-registrant-terms",
        "name": "Nominet registrant terms — March2024",
        "role": "Contract terms",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Unlawful use, discretionary serious-risk suspension and valid binding court orders are distinct grounds. Posted general terms do not establish any particular suspension or enforceability result.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unlawful use, discretionary serious-risk suspension and valid binding court orders are distinct grounds. Posted general terms do not establish any particular suspension or enforceability result."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Unlawful use, discretionary serious-risk suspension and valid binding court orders are distinct grounds. Posted general terms do not establish any particular suspension or enforceability result.",
        "structuralRole": "Contract terms",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Unlawful use prohibition6.1.5, discretionary high-risk ground10.1.2 and valid binding court order10.2.5 are distinct. Proscribed-name ground requires serious sexual-offence meaning and no reasonable legitimate use. Not a conclusion that any specific case satisfies them.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-terms-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reserves suspension and court-order grounds",
            "sourceName": "Nominet registrant terms — March2024",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": "2024-03-20 – 2024-03-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-listed-agencies",
      "label": "CPP listed enforcement agencies",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The complete July2026 section4 list has15 entries and includes the Gambling Commission. IWF and UKSIC are absent from this specific list; separate cooperation routes exist.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Eligibility role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-listed-agencies",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-listed-agencies",
        "name": "CPP listed enforcement agencies",
        "role": "Eligibility role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "The complete July2026 section4 list has15 entries and includes the Gambling Commission. IWF and UKSIC are absent from this specific list; separate cooperation routes exist.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The complete July2026 section4 list has15 entries and includes the Gambling Commission. IWF and UKSIC are absent from this specific list; separate cooperation routes exist."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The complete July2026 section4 list has15 entries and includes the Gambling Commission. IWF and UKSIC are absent from this specific list; separate cooperation routes exist.",
        "structuralRole": "Eligibility role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Criminal-use merits go through the referring agency complaint/appeal process and applicable external review. Nominet implementation complaints are separate; exact current complaint instrument was not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-merits-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected domain registrant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is directed to agency merits-review routes",
            "sourceName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "targetName": "CPP listed enforcement agencies",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Official written certification is the listed-agency trigger. IWF/UKSIC are not on this particular list; their separate relationship must not be represented as LEA certification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-agency-certification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may certify criminal use under listed-agency route",
            "sourceName": "CPP listed enforcement agencies",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "label": "Affected domain registrant",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Abstract role for notice, corrective action and challenge rights. No named domain, private contact or content is added.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Regulated role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-registrant",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "name": "Affected domain registrant",
        "role": "Regulated role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Abstract role for notice, corrective action and challenge rights. No named domain, private contact or content is added.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Abstract role for notice, corrective action and challenge rights. No named domain, private contact or content is added."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The affected domain registrant is the person or organisation holding a domain subject to a criminal-practices referral or Ashiko suspension request. This is an abstract affected role, with no private registrant information added.",
        "structuralRole": "Rights-holder for notice, correction and domain-access challenges",
        "significance": "Domain measures can disable an address without removing content from its host. The registrant's available response therefore runs through both the referring authority's assessment and the registry's implementation. Splitting those routes is essential to understand where factual correction and procedural complaints can change the outcome.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated notice and challenge mechanisms",
            "text": "Nominet's 6 July 2026 Criminal Practices Policy ordinarily provides at least forty-eight hours' notice, with an imminent-harm exception requiring senior approval. It specifies a minimum twenty-four-month special status for .UK, with different rules for .cymru and .wales. Criminal-use merits are directed to the referring agency; implementation complaints are separate. Ashiko's 2020 policy describes an initial error or remediation route. Historical 2014 review deadlines are not silently carried into the 2026 policy.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-notice",
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-measure",
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-merits-challenge",
              "w29-enf-e-historical-review-promise",
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
              "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Announcement effective4May2014 promised criminal-suspension lifting for ended conduct/wrong application/referrer nonresponse within10workingdays, distinct from proscribed-name30day review. Those historical deadlines are not silently imported into July2026CPP.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historical-review-promise"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced separate review promises in2014",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "date": "2014-04-03 – 2014-04-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "For .UK the posted July2026 policy specifies minimum24months; .cymru/.wales use expiry/cancellation/re-registration rules. Domain access can be disrupted without removing hosted content. This is a stated mechanism, not an action against a named registrant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-measure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may suspend or redirect under published CPP",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ordinarily at least48hours notice before special status. Significant evidence of imminent harm permits immediate action with senior-management approval. Satisfactory prior action or agency confirmation that criminal use ended affects continuation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-notice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy — July2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "specifies notice and corrective-action opportunity",
            "sourceName": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy — July2026",
            "targetName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Within the initial48hours the registrant may raise error and remediation; police responds to WHOIS registrant or documented representative, with police complaints separate. This is a stated2020 route, not an observed reversal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may request reassessment within the initial notice window",
            "sourceName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Criminal-use merits go through the referring agency complaint/appeal process and applicable external review. Nominet implementation complaints are separate; exact current complaint instrument was not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cpp-merits-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CPP listed enforcement agencies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is directed to agency merits-review routes",
            "sourceName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "targetName": "CPP listed enforcement agencies",
            "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The2023 report gives prior suspension, court-ordered transfer or subsequent compliance among non-suspension reasons; reversal follows agency-confirmed cessation. This is a positive reported correction/restraint record, not independently observed restoration or an error finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-nominet-reversal-basis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet reported suspensions and reversals",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports examples of restraint and lifting suspension",
            "sourceName": "Nominet reported suspensions and reversals",
            "targetName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "date": "2022-11-01–2023-10-31 reporting period"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
            "title": "Nominet exercised domain action: reported requests and reversals"
          },
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-registrar",
      "label": "Domain registrar in Ashiko process",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The 2020 police policy asks the registrar to investigate and act under its terms before police escalation to Nominet. This is distinct from registry, hosting provider and police authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operational role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-registrar",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-registrar",
        "name": "Domain registrar in Ashiko process",
        "role": "Operational role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "The 2020 police policy asks the registrar to investigate and act under its terms before police escalation to Nominet. This is distinct from registry, hosting provider and police authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The 2020 police policy asks the registrar to investigate and act under its terms before police escalation to Nominet. This is distinct from registry, hosting provider and police authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The 2020 police policy asks the registrar to investigate and act under its terms before police escalation to Nominet. This is distinct from registry, hosting provider and police authority.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The registrar investigates and acts where its terms justify action. After48hours without action police may ask Nominet to investigate and act; the policy does not describe private complainants skipping police authorisation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-registrar-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests registrar investigation and terms-based action first",
            "sourceName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "targetName": "Domain registrar in Ashiko process",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-reported-actions",
      "label": "Nominet reported suspensions and reversals",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Selected non-continuous periods only: 2019/20,2022/23,2023/24. IWF requests are not proved completed suspensions; reversals are not an audited false-positive rate. Units and reporting periods are preserved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported activity"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-reported-actions",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-reported-actions",
        "name": "Nominet reported suspensions and reversals",
        "role": "Reported activity",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Selected non-continuous periods only: 2019/20,2022/23,2023/24. IWF requests are not proved completed suspensions; reversals are not an audited false-positive rate. Units and reporting periods are preserved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Selected non-continuous periods only: 2019/20,2022/23,2023/24. IWF requests are not proved completed suspensions; reversals are not an audited false-positive rate. Units and reporting periods are preserved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Selected non-continuous periods only: 2019/20,2022/23,2023/24. IWF requests are not proved completed suspensions; reversals are not an audited false-positive rate. Units and reporting periods are preserved.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported activity",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The2023 report gives prior suspension, court-ordered transfer or subsequent compliance among non-suspension reasons; reversal follows agency-confirmed cessation. This is a positive reported correction/restraint record, not independently observed restoration or an error finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-nominet-reversal-basis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected domain registrant",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports examples of restraint and lifting suspension",
            "sourceName": "Nominet reported suspensions and reversals",
            "targetName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "date": "2022-11-01–2023-10-31 reporting period"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Selected periods respectively report22158/1193/913 suspended domains,47/3/0 requests not resulting in suspension, and15/19/16 reversals. These categories differ in units and cannot be added into a success/error rate. Reversals are not attributed specifically to IWF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-nominet-reported-actions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
                "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported suspensions, non-suspensions and reversals",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet reported suspensions and reversals",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
            "title": "Nominet exercised domain action: reported requests and reversals"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-statutory-account",
      "label": "Nominet July2026 account of future court-backed route",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Nominet reports April2026 Royal Assent and commencement still needed, with indicative end-November timing. Underlying Act and current commencement were not independently read in this run; voluntary CPP remains distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported policy state"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-statutory-account",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-statutory-account",
        "name": "Nominet July2026 account of future court-backed route",
        "role": "Reported policy state",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Nominet reports April2026 Royal Assent and commencement still needed, with indicative end-November timing. Underlying Act and current commencement were not independently read in this run; voluntary CPP remains distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Nominet reports April2026 Royal Assent and commencement still needed, with indicative end-November timing. Underlying Act and current commencement were not independently read in this run; voluntary CPP remains distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nominet reports April2026 Royal Assent and commencement still needed, with indicative end-November timing. Underlying Act and current commencement were not independently read in this run; voluntary CPP remains distinct.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported policy state",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "16July2026 blog reports Royal Assent29April and commencement still required, with indicative end-November timing. These are Nominet-attributed legal/timetable statements; no independent current Act or commencement finding is added.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-reported-future-statutory-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
                "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described future court-backed powers and voluntary-first practice",
            "sourceName": "Nominet UK",
            "targetName": "Nominet July2026 account of future court-backed route",
            "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
            "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-city-police",
      "label": "City of London Police",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Public police force within which PIPCU operates. Unit funding, broad remit, case acceptance and individual suspension authorisation are separately evidenced.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Police force"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-city-police",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-city-police",
        "name": "City of London Police",
        "role": "Police force",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Public police force within which PIPCU operates. Unit funding, broad remit, case acceptance and individual suspension authorisation are separately evidenced.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public police force within which PIPCU operates. Unit funding, broad remit, case acceptance and individual suspension authorisation are separately evidenced."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "City of London Police is the public police force within which the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit operates. PIPCU is a police unit, rather than a separately identified corporate grant recipient.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional home of specialist intellectual-property policing",
        "significance": "The force connects public policing powers to specialist funding, secondees and industry intelligence. Its organisational budget, a unit's broad priorities and an officer's decision on a case are different levels of authority. Distinguishing them helps explain resource dependence without turning a funding relationship into case-level command.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Funding records have different meanings",
            "text": "The 2014 government account calls PIPCU operationally independent and describes IPO support and secondments. A 2018 draft financial plan lists an unconfirmed £1.613 million annual forecast across five years. A later for-decision paper proposes a £0.5 million combined increase across three units without identifying PIPCU's share. Neither figure is a received PIPCU grant. The historical referral guide records police participation in broad priority-setting, while Ashiko's policy separately identifies its suspension authoriser.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
              },
              {
                "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
                "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
                "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version 1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-police-unit",
              "w29-enf-e-historical-unconfirmed-forecast",
              "w29-enf-e-combined-budget-proposal",
              "w29-enf-e-steering-police"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Draft financial-plan AppendixB lists£1.613m in each year2018/19–2022/23 as unconfirmed. This is neither a received annual grant nor a signed indexation obligation. Financial details: value: 1,613,000; currency: GBP; kind: unconfirmed annual forecast, repeated across five years; period: 2018/19–2022/23; each year",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historical-unconfirmed-forecast"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
                "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published unconfirmed IPO income forecasts in2018",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2018-05-24 – 2018-05-24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "For-decision paper describes£0.5m combined increase across PIPCU,IFED andDCPCU; no PIPCU share. Paragraph31 places detailed funding streams in non-public Appendix3. This is a proposal/publication boundary, not an approval or concealment inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-combined-budget-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
                "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "included the unit in a combined2025 funding increase proposal",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "PIPCU is a police unit, not a separately identified corporate recipient. The2014 government account calls it operationally independent and reports IPO funding and secondments.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-police-unit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "hosts the specialist unit",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Caption/body names Adam Williams and Pete O’Doherty in the signing account. This is text-attributed event evidence, not visual verification of signatures or an executed agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-reported-police-signing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed participation in the annual agreement signing",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Police participation in broad priority agreement is reported, not a delegation of case approval to every participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-police"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions",
            "heading": "Acceptance rights and the remaining discriminator",
            "text": "The most useful next documents are the announced 2026–2029 funding agreement and financial/assurance schedule , held by IPO/DSIT and City of London Police; the BPI secondment instrument , held by BPI and the police; and, if publicly issued, the 2027 pilot specification , including eligibility, additionality, priority setting, conflict controls and who accepts contributions. The public budget specifically identifies a non-public detailed schedule; this is a precise record boundary, not proof all grant conditions are secret. No pilot-design or other-unit investigation was opened in this run.",
            "matched": [
              "City of London Police"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "73c66d31745d77de29001c0da88b44586faa7f2aaf066030e33195642d3ccac4"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction",
            "heading": "What the sequence establishes",
            "text": "A finite next discriminator is a current public IWL operating procedure or redacted inclusion/challenge decision with timestamps, reasons, reviewer, removal notice and recipient notification. The likely holder is PIPCU/City of London Police; relevant product evidence would be an accepted technical specification or change-event protocol. No claim is made that a particular unpublished document exists. This would distinguish effective correction from list-only deletion and establish whether the dated safeguards remain operative.",
            "matched": [
              "City of London Police"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ad2d2f55a352232b6058e98f7b8ed8c7737522d3b999270e2ecf045dd79e5d79"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "label": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "The Patent Office, operating as the Intellectual Property Office, is an executive agency and trading fund. Funding announcements, intelligence intake and policy coordination have different functions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ipo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "name": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
        "role": "Government body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "The Patent Office, operating as the Intellectual Property Office, is an executive agency and trading fund. Funding announcements, intelligence intake and policy coordination have different functions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The Patent Office, operating as the Intellectual Property Office, is an executive agency and trading fund. Funding announcements, intelligence intake and policy coordination have different functions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 13
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK Intellectual Property Office is the Patent Office operating as an executive agency and trading fund. In this investigation it funds or supports specialist enforcement, operates an intelligence intake route and coordinates counter-infringement policy work.",
        "structuralRole": "Public resource and intelligence coordinator for intellectual-property enforcement",
        "significance": "IPO connects funding, incoming intelligence and policy development, but those functions confer different kinds of influence. A payment to its parent department, an intelligence referral and a police suspension decision are separate acts. Following that division clarifies how public resources reach specialist capacity without inventing direct control of individual cases.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Money, intake and future capacity",
            "text": "Its 2025/26 accounts record a £2.533 million additional dividend paid to DSIT covering PIPCU actual costs since the previous such dividend; this is not evidence of a direct PIPCU bank receipt. From 11 August 2025, the IPO Intelligence Gateway replaced the old PIPCU submission form, allowing the team to develop intelligence or refer it onward. A funding announcement plans an industry co-funding pilot from April 2027 for extra capacity. It does not identify committed contributors or give them case-selection rights.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-dsit-dividend",
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-operated",
              "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "23October2014 announcement describes initial£2.56m for two years fromSeptember2013 and a further£3m through2017. Announced historical support is not a reconciled payment ledger or current contract. Financial details: value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: further funding announced; period: through2017",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historic-funding2014"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced further£3m funding to2017",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Announcement plans an industry co-funding pilot fromApril2027 for extra capacity, combining public powers/strategic oversight with industry expertise/intelligence. No contributor commitments, selection weights, conflict rules or individual-case rights are published in the notice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed PIPCU industry co-funding pilot — April2027",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is to develop priorities and contribution levels with PIPCU",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Proposed PIPCU industry co-funding pilot — April2027",
            "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "New route replaces the old PIPCU submission form from11August2025. IPO team may develop intelligence or refer to law enforcement; no published weighting, case acceptance guarantee or transfer of Ashiko DCI authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced assessment and prioritisation of incoming intelligence",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2022 strategy says IPO Board will set milestones in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. The source supplies a policy design, not an inspected adopted board resolution or private veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-board-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IPO Board — strategy delivery role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was assigned setting strategy delivery milestones",
            "sourceName": "IPO Board — strategy delivery role",
            "targetName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "date": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IPO accounts record£2.533m paid to DSIT inFY2025/26, covering PIPCU actual costs since the previous additional dividend. Comparative£2.624m belongs toFY2024/25. Neither is proof of a direct PIPCU bank receipt, Ashiko allocation or an additional independent transfer to be double-counted. Financial details: value: 2,533,000; currency: GBP; kind: accounts-recorded additional dividend paid to DSIT; period: 2025-04-01/2026-03-31",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-dsit-dividend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "recorded an additional dividend paid to cover PIPCU costs",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "date": "FY2025/26 ended31March2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 report disclosure"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2022strategy and FY2022/23 report explicitly describe KYBC consideration and several Whitehall forums. MPA requests more departmental participation but is not thereby author of government policy or a voting member. Actual meeting dispositions/approved drafting remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-kybc-forums"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported cross-departmental KYBC work",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "date": "2022strategy andFY2022/23report; exact meeting dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Displayed IPO accounts describe an annual2026/27 Service Agreement as the first of the three-year funding arrangement; main metadata29May2026 does not fix the event day. Contract and signature images not obtained; account alias not independently authenticated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-reported-agreement-signing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed participation in signing the2026/27Service Agreement",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": "Post metadata29May2026; event described as that week"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "City of London Police specialist unit. Historical account describes operational independence; industry evidence, historical remit participation and secondment do not establish private control of individual cases.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Police unit"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-pipcu",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "name": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
        "role": "Police unit",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "City of London Police specialist unit. Historical account describes operational independence; industry evidence, historical remit participation and secondment do not establish private control of individual cases.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "City of London Police specialist unit. Historical account describes operational independence; industry evidence, historical remit participation and secondment do not establish private control of individual cases."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 23
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PIPCU is the City of London Police’s specialist intellectual-property crime unit. Its published operations include requests affecting domains and advertising, with historical government funding and industry cooperation documented separately.",
        "structuralRole": "Police action through domain and advertising intermediaries",
        "significance": "PIPCU is important because its enforcement work can operate through organisations controlling a website’s domain or advertising income. The investigation distinguishes police assessment, industry referrals and the intermediary’s action, then asks where a challenge or reversal can occur.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "March2026 announcement commits approximately£3m annually, through IPO, for the three-year period. Amount is an announced approximate annual baseline, not an executed payment schedule or£9m observed cash total. Written answer19March confirms duration. Financial details: value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: approximate annual baseline commitment; period: April2026–March2029; per year, not three-year paid total",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-baseline-funding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              },
              {
                "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced baseline support through IPO forApril2026–March2029",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Historical guide gives six factors: remit; organised activity; public-safety danger and actual/anticipated financial loss or reputational harm; ongoing activity; asset recovery; prosecution prospects. Referrals require evidence/groundwork and separated inferences. Detective Inspector gives refusal reasons/alternatives;10workingdays is an aim with updates, not a current Gateway rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historical-case-acceptance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published evidence requirements and police refusal review",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Draft financial-plan AppendixB lists£1.613m in each year2018/19–2022/23 as unconfirmed. This is neither a received annual grant nor a signed indexation obligation. Financial details: value: 1,613,000; currency: GBP; kind: unconfirmed annual forecast, repeated across five years; period: 2018/19–2022/23; each year",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historical-unconfirmed-forecast"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
                "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "City of London Police",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published unconfirmed IPO income forecasts in2018",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2018-05-24 – 2018-05-24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "23October2014 announcement describes initial£2.56m for two years fromSeptember2013 and a further£3m through2017. Announced historical support is not a reconciled payment ledger or current contract. Financial details: value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: further funding announced; period: through2017",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historic-funding2014"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced further£3m funding to2017",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "For-decision paper describes£0.5m combined increase across PIPCU,IFED andDCPCU; no PIPCU share. Paragraph31 places detailed funding streams in non-public Appendix3. This is a proposal/publication boundary, not an approval or concealment inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-combined-budget-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
                "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "City of London Police",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "included the unit in a combined2025 funding increase proposal",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Within the initial48hours the registrant may raise error and remediation; police responds to WHOIS registrant or documented representative, with police complaints separate. This is a stated2020 route, not an observed reversal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected domain registrant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may request reassessment within the initial notice window",
            "sourceName": "Affected domain registrant",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The2020 policy specifies a minimum24-month suspension or earlier expiry of the registration, not an unconditional fixed24-month term. It is a dated police instrument and is not substituted for July2026CPP wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-police-registry-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nominet UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may escalate after registrar non-action under2020policy",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Nominet UK",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PIPCU checks the evidential standard before qualifying referrals are circulated for advertising action. No prior adjudication condition is specified in this case study; this is not a comprehensive powers opinion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-screen"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "assesses qualifying referrals before distribution",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit is a specialist unit within the City of London Police. Its work can reach websites through domain registries, advertisers and payment providers, using police assessments and requests to enlist intermediaries that control access or commercial support.",
          "structuralRole": "Police assessments translated into domain and advertising disruption",
          "significance": "PIPCU is important because it shows government enforcement operating through privately run infrastructure. The police investigate and assess; registries, advertisers and payment firms hold the practical controls that can interrupt a website's address, revenue or ability to receive money.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit, or PIPCU, is part of the City of London Police. It investigates intellectual-property crime and works with institutions that can disrupt the commercial and technical services supporting a website. Its position combines public investigative authority with dependence on intermediaries that operate domains, advertising and payments.",
            "Its published Operation Ashiko policy from 2020 describes a domain-suspension process based on investigation and due diligence. It allows a request to move from a registrar to Nominet when the registrar does not act. The process includes an initial opportunity for the registrant to raise error or describe remedial action. This places an assessment, a notice and an infrastructure decision in sequence, with practical consequences for whether users can reach the site through its address.",
            "Operation Creative follows another path. Guidance requires rights holders to supply evidence for police assessment before qualifying sites enter the advertising-disruption process. PIPCU distributes the Infringing Website List for use by advertising intermediaries and describes contacting operators before further action. It can also ask a payment provider or merchant bank to withdraw service. These are distinct pressure points through which a website's economic support can be affected.",
            "The work has a public resource base. A March 2026 announcement committed approximately £3 million annually through the Intellectual Property Office for April 2026 to March 2029. Earlier records also described seconded expertise from the IPO and the music industry's BPI. PIPCU's importance is this combination of resources, assessment and intermediary cooperation: a police unit can achieve effects across several privately operated systems without running those systems itself."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
              "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
              "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
              "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
              "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
            },
            {
              "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
              "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "label": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "2020 policy links rightsholder evidence, police investigation/DCI approval, registrar action and possible Nominet escalation. Agreement is described but not itself acquired. Delivered-operation numbers are police-reported.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operational programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ashiko",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "name": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
        "role": "Operational programme",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "2020 policy links rightsholder evidence, police investigation/DCI approval, registrar action and possible Nominet escalation. Agreement is described but not itself acquired. Delivered-operation numbers are police-reported.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2020 policy links rightsholder evidence, police investigation/DCI approval, registrar action and possible Nominet escalation. Agreement is described but not itself acquired. Delivered-operation numbers are police-reported."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Operation Ashiko is PIPCU's domain-suspension workflow addressing counterfeit-goods activity. The retained 2020 policy describes how evidence from rights holders and enforcement sources passes through police investigation, authorisation and requests to registrars or Nominet.",
        "structuralRole": "Police-mediated route from infringement evidence to domain disruption",
        "significance": "Ashiko connects privately supplied evidence to public policing and then to a domain intermediary's powers. Those are successive decisions rather than a direct private suspension right. The chain is useful to follow because a domain can stop resolving even when the hosted content itself has not been removed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The dated workflow",
            "text": "The policy requires police investigation and due diligence, with a PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector authorising requests. Registrars investigate and act where their terms justify it; after forty-eight hours without action, police may ask Nominet to investigate and act. Registrants have a stated initial challenge route. A police contribution reports 32,995 website suspensions in 2018/19. The February 2022 strategy describes one detective plus management support and no charge to referrers; these dated accounts do not establish current staffing or individual outcomes.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-police-ashiko",
              "w29-enf-e-private-evidence",
              "w29-enf-e-dci-authorisation",
              "w29-enf-e-registrar-first",
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-delivery2019",
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-resource-account2022"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The registrar investigates and acts where its terms justify action. After48hours without action police may ask Nominet to investigate and act; the policy does not describe private complainants skipping police authorisation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-registrar-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Domain registrar in Ashiko process",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests registrar investigation and terms-based action first",
            "sourceName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "targetName": "Domain registrar in Ashiko process",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Brands/enforcement sources supply evidence and may confirm infringement where necessary; police retains investigative and authorisation steps. No grant of independent private suspension authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-private-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may provide intelligence and infringement evidence",
            "sourceName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The2020 police policy describes requests based on investigation and due diligence, using a reported Nominet agreement without a court order. The agreement itself was not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-police-ashiko"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates the published suspension process",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section9 names the PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector as authoriser. This is narrower than control of every downstream registry decision or all other programme actions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-dci-authorisation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector — suspension authoriser",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must authorise every police domain suspension",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector — suspension authoriser",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "PIPCU contribution reports32995 websites suspended in2018/19. Adjacent Nominet request/domain totals cover a different period and are not a matched denominator. No independently verified individual outcome or current all-TLD total inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-delivery2019"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported32995 website suspensions in2018/19",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2018/19 report period; precise operation interval not separately established"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "February2022 strategy says one detective plus PIPCU management support and no charge to brands/referrers. This does not establish current staffing, total cost, a budget allocation or a free right to compel action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ashiko-resource-account2022"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported one detective plus management and no referral charge",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-pipcu-dci",
      "label": "PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector — suspension authoriser",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Section9 of the June2020 Ashiko policy requires authorisation for every police domain suspension. This does not transfer registrar/registry implementation or court powers to the officer.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-pipcu-dci",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-pipcu-dci",
        "name": "PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector — suspension authoriser",
        "role": "Decision role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Section9 of the June2020 Ashiko policy requires authorisation for every police domain suspension. This does not transfer registrar/registry implementation or court powers to the officer.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Section9 of the June2020 Ashiko policy requires authorisation for every police domain suspension. This does not transfer registrar/registry implementation or court powers to the officer."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Section9 of the June2020 Ashiko policy requires authorisation for every police domain suspension. This does not transfer registrar/registry implementation or court powers to the officer.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section9 names the PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector as authoriser. This is narrower than control of every downstream registry decision or all other programme actions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-dci-authorisation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must authorise every police domain suspension",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector — suspension authoriser",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-gateway",
      "label": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Announced12August2025 as effective11August, replacing the previous PIPCU submission form for rightsholders/enforcement partners. Initial assessment and prioritisation may develop intelligence or lead to law-enforcement referral; acceptance is not guaranteed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Administrative intake"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-gateway",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-gateway",
        "name": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
        "role": "Administrative intake",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Announced12August2025 as effective11August, replacing the previous PIPCU submission form for rightsholders/enforcement partners. Initial assessment and prioritisation may develop intelligence or lead to law-enforcement referral; acceptance is not guaranteed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Announced12August2025 as effective11August, replacing the previous PIPCU submission form for rightsholders/enforcement partners. Initial assessment and prioritisation may develop intelligence or lead to law-enforcement referral; acceptance is not guaranteed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Announced12August2025 as effective11August, replacing the previous PIPCU submission form for rightsholders/enforcement partners. Initial assessment and prioritisation may develop intelligence or lead to law-enforcement referral; acceptance is not guaranteed.",
        "structuralRole": "Administrative intake",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "New route replaces the old PIPCU submission form from11August2025. IPO team may develop intelligence or refer to law enforcement; no published weighting, case acceptance guarantee or transfer of Ashiko DCI authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced assessment and prioritisation of incoming intelligence",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Announcement names rightsholders/enforcement partners and distinguishes public reporting through Trading Standards/Crimestoppers. The form and operational endpoint were not opened.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-referrers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "are directed to the replacement professional intake",
            "sourceName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "targetName": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "PIPCU is a liaison/enforcement recipient, alongside other law-enforcement partners. Intake is not a binding instruction to investigate or suspend.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-referral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may refer intelligence following assessment",
            "sourceName": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-referrers",
      "label": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Brands, representatives/trade bodies and enforcement partners may supply evidence/intelligence. Submission, infringement confirmation and private research are inputs, not police certification or a right to compel registry action.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Input role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-referrers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-referrers",
        "name": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
        "role": "Input role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Brands, representatives/trade bodies and enforcement partners may supply evidence/intelligence. Submission, infringement confirmation and private research are inputs, not police certification or a right to compel registry action.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Brands, representatives/trade bodies and enforcement partners may supply evidence/intelligence. Submission, infringement confirmation and private research are inputs, not police certification or a right to compel registry action."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This collective covers rights holders, brand representatives, trade bodies and enforcement partners supplying evidence or intelligence for intellectual-property enforcement. It is an input role, not a single organisation or an independent power to suspend domains.",
        "structuralRole": "Private and public evidence inputs to police case selection",
        "significance": "Referrers can shape what authorities learn about suspected infringement and can contribute specialist knowledge. Police investigation, case acceptance and domain-action authorisation remain further steps. That distinction explains the practical value of industry access without turning a submission into a guaranteed enforcement service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Intake and selection",
            "text": "The historical PIPCU guide requires evidence and groundwork and distinguishes inference from established fact. Its six acceptance factors include remit, organised activity, safety and financial or reputational harm, ongoing conduct, asset recovery and prosecution prospects. From 11 August 2025, the IPO Intelligence Gateway replaced the old submission form for rights holders and enforcement partners. The older ten-working-day response aim is not established as a current Gateway rule.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              },
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-private-evidence",
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-referrers",
              "w29-enf-e-historical-case-acceptance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Historical guide gives six factors: remit; organised activity; public-safety danger and actual/anticipated financial loss or reputational harm; ongoing activity; asset recovery; prosecution prospects. Referrals require evidence/groundwork and separated inferences. Detective Inspector gives refusal reasons/alternatives;10workingdays is an aim with updates, not a current Gateway rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-historical-case-acceptance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published evidence requirements and police refusal review",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Brands/enforcement sources supply evidence and may confirm infringement where necessary; police retains investigative and authorisation steps. No grant of independent private suspension authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-private-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may provide intelligence and infringement evidence",
            "sourceName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "targetName": "Operation Ashiko — dated suspension workflow",
            "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Announcement names rightsholders/enforcement partners and distinguishes public reporting through Trading Standards/Crimestoppers. The form and operational endpoint were not opened.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-gateway-referrers"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "are directed to the replacement professional intake",
            "sourceName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "targetName": "IPO Intelligence Gateway",
            "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Rightsholders and industry bodies have an actual reported remit contribution. No particular company vote, quorum, funding condition or authority to compel a case established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-industry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "are named among participants agreeing broad priorities",
            "sourceName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "targetName": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-bpi",
      "label": "BPI — recorded-music trade body",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named in2014 as supplying an internet-investigator secondee to PIPCU and in2020 as a KYBC proponent. Neither record establishes a current secondment, its terms or a paid enforcement vote.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-bpi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-bpi",
        "name": "BPI — recorded-music trade body",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named in2014 as supplying an internet-investigator secondee to PIPCU and in2020 as a KYBC proponent. Neither record establishes a current secondment, its terms or a paid enforcement vote.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in2014 as supplying an internet-investigator secondee to PIPCU and in2020 as a KYBC proponent. Neither record establishes a current secondment, its terms or a paid enforcement vote."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "BPI is the recorded-music trade body named in historical PIPCU staffing and later online-business-verification advocacy. These records show both operational expertise supplied to policing and a separate policy proposal affecting commercial service relationships.",
        "structuralRole": "Rights-holder expertise and business-verification advocacy",
        "significance": "BPI's two documented roles connect an industry's enforcement knowledge to different institutions. A secondment can add investigative capacity, while a consultation response seeks changes to service-provider obligations. Neither role by itself supplies a private vote over police cases or proves that a proposed verification rule became law.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two dated contributions",
            "text": "A 23 October 2014 government account names a BPI internet-investigator secondee at PIPCU; it does not provide salary allocation, term or evidence of a current secondment. BPI's redacted November 2020 CMA response proposes identity, contact and business-person checks, with conditional bank details. Its service-cessation clause concerns withheld or incorrect information without separately requiring proven infringement in that clause. The proposed scope is business customers, not every consumer.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
              },
              {
                "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-bpi-secondment",
              "w29-enf-e-bpi-business-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public redacted versionNovember2020 specifies identity/contact/entity-person checks and conditional bank details. The operative proposal stops service for withheld/incorrect information without separately requiring proved infringement in that clause. Scope is business customers, not every consumer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-bpi-business-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BPI business-verification proposal — redacted November2020",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed stopping services for withheld or incorrect business identity",
            "sourceName": "BPI — recorded-music trade body",
            "targetName": "BPI business-verification proposal — redacted November2020",
            "date": "Redacted versionNovember2020; published8December2020"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2014 government account names BPI and an IPO senior-intelligence-officer secondment. The source does not give salary allocation, executed secondment terms, duration or private approval rights; its21-person staffing statement is not current headcount.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-bpi-secondment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to supply an internet-investigator secondee",
            "sourceName": "BPI — recorded-music trade body",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          },
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
      "label": "Proposed PIPCU industry co-funding pilot — April2027",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "March2026 announcement plans additional industry-supported enforcement from April2027; IPO and PIPCU are to develop priorities and contribution levels. No contributor, payment, selection rule or executed agreement identified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed funding programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
        "name": "Proposed PIPCU industry co-funding pilot — April2027",
        "role": "Proposed funding programme",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "March2026 announcement plans additional industry-supported enforcement from April2027; IPO and PIPCU are to develop priorities and contribution levels. No contributor, payment, selection rule or executed agreement identified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "March2026 announcement plans additional industry-supported enforcement from April2027; IPO and PIPCU are to develop priorities and contribution levels. No contributor, payment, selection rule or executed agreement identified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "March2026 announcement plans additional industry-supported enforcement from April2027; IPO and PIPCU are to develop priorities and contribution levels. No contributor, payment, selection rule or executed agreement identified.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed funding programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Announcement plans an industry co-funding pilot fromApril2027 for extra capacity, combining public powers/strategic oversight with industry expertise/intelligence. No contributor commitments, selection weights, conflict rules or individual-case rights are published in the notice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is to develop priorities and contribution levels with PIPCU",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Proposed PIPCU industry co-funding pilot — April2027",
            "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PIPCU and IPO are to develop pilot priorities and contribution levels. Joint future design is not proof of collected industry money or industry voting power.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-police"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named joint developer of the future pilot",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Proposed PIPCU industry co-funding pilot — April2027",
            "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
            "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-steering-group",
      "label": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Posted undated referral guide says IPO, police, rightsholders and industry bodies agreed broad priorities. No voting/quorum instrument read. This is not the later IP Crime Group structure or current Gateway.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-steering-group",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-steering-group",
        "name": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Posted undated referral guide says IPO, police, rightsholders and industry bodies agreed broad priorities. No voting/quorum instrument read. This is not the later IP Crime Group structure or current Gateway.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Posted undated referral guide says IPO, police, rightsholders and industry bodies agreed broad priorities. No voting/quorum instrument read. This is not the later IP Crime Group structure or current Gateway."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The historical PIPCU Steering Group is the body described in a posted referral guide as agreeing broad priorities with IPO, police, rights holders and industry bodies. Its dated context differs from later counter-infringement governance and the IPO Intelligence Gateway.",
        "structuralRole": "Historical shared contribution to the unit's broad remit",
        "significance": "The guide documents an actual industry contribution to priority-setting, making the relationship more specific than attendance alone. Broad remit-setting still differs from deciding whether a particular referral becomes a police case. That distinction preserves both the significance of participation and the officer-level acceptance process.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope and chronology",
            "text": "The guide describes priorities covering physical goods with an online connection and digital content. It mentions October 2014 funding and uses a submission form later replaced in 2025. No voting rules, quorum, private funding condition or current charter were acquired. This historical body should not be merged with the 2022/23 IP Crime Group executive structure or the later Gateway intake mechanism.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-ipo",
              "w29-enf-e-steering-police",
              "w29-enf-e-steering-industry",
              "w29-enf-e-steering-remit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Posted undated referral guide names IPO alongside police, rightsholders and industry bodies as having agreed broad priorities. Source mentionsOctober2014 funding and uses the subsequently replaced form; no current charter inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-ipo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "date": "Undated historical guide; no exact publication day"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Priorities cover physical goods with an online connection and digital content. Steering-role evidence is historical; it is not the same body as the FY2022/23 IP Crime Group executive board or the2025Gateway.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-remit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported to have agreed broad unit priorities",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Rightsholders and industry bodies have an actual reported remit contribution. No particular company vote, quorum, funding condition or authority to compel a case established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-industry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "are named among participants agreeing broad priorities",
            "sourceName": "Ashiko rightsholder and enforcement referrers",
            "targetName": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Police participation in broad priority agreement is reported, not a delegation of case approval to every participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-steering-police"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "City of London Police",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "PIPCU historical Steering Group",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ipo-board",
      "label": "IPO Board — strategy delivery role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The 2022 strategy assigns setting delivery milestones to the IPO Board in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. A published design is not an inspected board decision or delegated-case authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ipo-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ipo-board",
        "name": "IPO Board — strategy delivery role",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "The 2022 strategy assigns setting delivery milestones to the IPO Board in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. A published design is not an inspected board decision or delegated-case authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The 2022 strategy assigns setting delivery milestones to the IPO Board in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. A published design is not an inspected board decision or delegated-case authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The 2022 strategy assigns setting delivery milestones to the IPO Board in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. A published design is not an inspected board decision or delegated-case authority.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2022 strategy says IPO Board will set milestones in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. The source supplies a policy design, not an inspected adopted board resolution or private veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-board-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was assigned setting strategy delivery milestones",
            "sourceName": "IPO Board — strategy delivery role",
            "targetName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "date": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ipcg-delivery",
      "label": "IP Crime Group delivery group — FY2022/23 account",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "IPO reports a mixed enforcement-and-industry delivery group as implemented coordination machinery. Exact governing charter, votes and current membership were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ipcg-delivery",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ipcg-delivery",
        "name": "IP Crime Group delivery group — FY2022/23 account",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "IPO reports a mixed enforcement-and-industry delivery group as implemented coordination machinery. Exact governing charter, votes and current membership were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "IPO reports a mixed enforcement-and-industry delivery group as implemented coordination machinery. Exact governing charter, votes and current membership were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "IPO reports a mixed enforcement-and-industry delivery group as implemented coordination machinery. Exact governing charter, votes and current membership were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipcg-delivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported establishing a mixed industry/enforcement delivery group",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IP Crime Group delivery group — FY2022/23 account",
            "date": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ipcg-industry-advisory",
      "label": "IP Crime Group industry advisory committee — FY2022/23",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Reported industry advisory channel, kept distinct from delivery group, senior executive board and PIPCU Steering Group. No case-approval right inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advisory body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ipcg-industry-advisory",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ipcg-industry-advisory",
        "name": "IP Crime Group industry advisory committee — FY2022/23",
        "role": "Advisory body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Reported industry advisory channel, kept distinct from delivery group, senior executive board and PIPCU Steering Group. No case-approval right inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported industry advisory channel, kept distinct from delivery group, senior executive board and PIPCU Steering Group. No case-approval right inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reported industry advisory channel, kept distinct from delivery group, senior executive board and PIPCU Steering Group. No case-approval right inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Advisory body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipcg-advisory"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported establishing an industry advisory committee",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IP Crime Group industry advisory committee — FY2022/23",
            "date": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ipcg-executive",
      "label": "IP Crime Group executive board — FY2022/23 account",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "IPO reports senior industry/enforcement executive coordination for tactical and strategic direction. A report of establishment is not a constitution or proof that industry can approve individual police actions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ipcg-executive",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ipcg-executive",
        "name": "IP Crime Group executive board — FY2022/23 account",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "IPO reports senior industry/enforcement executive coordination for tactical and strategic direction. A report of establishment is not a constitution or proof that industry can approve individual police actions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "IPO reports senior industry/enforcement executive coordination for tactical and strategic direction. A report of establishment is not a constitution or proof that industry can approve individual police actions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "IPO reports senior industry/enforcement executive coordination for tactical and strategic direction. A report of establishment is not a constitution or proof that industry can approve individual police actions.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipcg-executive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported an executive board for tactical/strategic coordination",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IP Crime Group executive board — FY2022/23 account",
            "date": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-alliance",
      "label": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Coalition identified by its own substantive About page and published submissions. Trade association membership is distinct from corporate legal entity or government appointment. No funder control assumed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Coalition"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-alliance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-alliance",
        "name": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
        "role": "Coalition",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Coalition identified by its own substantive About page and published submissions. Trade association membership is distinct from corporate legal entity or government appointment. No funder control assumed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Coalition identified by its own substantive About page and published submissions. Trade association membership is distinct from corporate legal entity or government appointment. No funder control assumed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Alliance for Intellectual Property is a coalition representing intellectual-property interests. Its published submissions advocate stronger online business accountability, and RUSI acknowledges it as one of five co-funders of a 2021 report on intellectual-property crime.",
        "structuralRole": "Trade coalition linking rights-holder proposals, research and policy forums",
        "significance": "The Alliance operates across several channels: formal consultation submissions, parliamentary evidence, commissioned research and industry-government meetings. These provide identifiable routes for a policy idea to circulate. Each route establishes participation or support, while the authority to enact duties or authorise police action remains elsewhere.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A documented advocacy trajectory",
            "text": "Its internally dated August 2020 CMA response proposes business-identity checks and infrastructure consequences. September 2021 parliamentary evidence seeks a suitable legislative vehicle across online infrastructure. RUSI's corrected March 2021 report acknowledges Alliance co-funding without amounts or contractual editorial rights. A May 2026 public post also identifies Alliance representative Dan Guthrie at a reported PIPCU agreement-signing event; attendance establishes neither a funding contribution nor a right to select police work.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-business-proposal",
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-parliamentary-route",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-attendance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "OSB0016 internalSeptember2021 asks for a suitable legislative vehicle across infrastructure. Its citation to broad CMA unlawful-activity concerns is not exact policy adoption. Original PDF not retained; complete three-page primary reader supports the claim.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-parliamentary-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance OSB0016 evidence — September2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocated a legislative business-verification duty to parliament",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Alliance OSB0016 evidence — September2021",
            "date": "InternalSeptember2021; exact publication day unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Undated Online Accountability page supports KYBC across hosting, advertising, proxies, payments and marketplaces. This is a comparison to the dated proposal, not an asserted unchanged text/version chain or a current enacted duty.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-current-position"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains a similar business-verification position in current-captured material",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "date": "Observed9September2026; publication/update date unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "InternalAugust2020 document advocates stronger business identity checks and infrastructure/payment consequences. Exact submission day unknown;8December2020 is CMA publication, not filing or decision date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-business-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted a business-verification proposal in the CMA record",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "date": "InternalAugust2020; published8December2020"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 report disclosure"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Post identifies Dan/Daniel Guthrie as attendee. Alliance About page supports his role. Attendance is not evidence of being a contracting signatory, contributing money or approving police priorities.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-attendance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed attendance through its Director General",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Closed 9 September 2026 after the authorised public-source pass. This packet adds an author-attributed report of a 2026–27 Service Agreement signing and a meeting involving the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. It does not acquire the agreement, a pilot specification, an industry contribution or a private right to select police work.",
            "matched": [
              "Alliance for Intellectual Property"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dea394c8863e8ebd015c92ead1ad8e2ff3955f600fcccc3c8e292c817855c14f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-sky-role",
      "label": "Sky anti-piracy participation — attributed event role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Public signing post attributes attendance to Sky Anti-Piracy Director Matthew Hibbert. The exact corporate contracting entity, payment or approval role is not established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organizational role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-sky-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-sky-role",
        "name": "Sky anti-piracy participation — attributed event role",
        "role": "Organizational role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Public signing post attributes attendance to Sky Anti-Piracy Director Matthew Hibbert. The exact corporate contracting entity, payment or approval role is not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public signing post attributes attendance to Sky Anti-Piracy Director Matthew Hibbert. The exact corporate contracting entity, payment or approval role is not established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public signing post attributes attendance to Sky Anti-Piracy Director Matthew Hibbert. The exact corporate contracting entity, payment or approval role is not established.",
        "structuralRole": "Organizational role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Post identifies Matthew Hibbert, Sky Anti-Piracy Director. No executed contract, payment or police decision right follows from attendance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-sky-attendance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed attendance",
            "sourceName": "Sky anti-piracy participation — attributed event role",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-signing2026",
      "label": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Main post metadata29May2026 describes signing that week and industry attendance. Exact event date and agreement text not obtained; displayed account alias not independently reconciled to the government-linked profile.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-signing2026",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-signing2026",
        "name": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
        "role": "Reported event",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Main post metadata29May2026 describes signing that week and industry attendance. Exact event date and agreement text not obtained; displayed account alias not independently reconciled to the government-linked profile.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Main post metadata29May2026 describes signing that week and industry attendance. Exact event date and agreement text not obtained; displayed account alias not independently reconciled to the government-linked profile."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "domain-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject records a public-post account of a 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing, described as the first annual agreement within a three-year funding arrangement. The main post metadata is dated 29 May 2026; the exact event day was not established.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported meeting connecting public funding parties and industry attendees",
        "significance": "The account identifies a potential documentary bridge between announced funding and an annual service agreement. It also shows industry presence at the event. Those observations guide attention toward the agreement's actual terms rather than treating attendance as a signature, contribution or operational decision right.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the post says",
            "text": "The caption and body name Adam Williams and Pete O'Doherty in the signing account, and identify Dan Guthrie of the Alliance and Sky anti-piracy director Matthew Hibbert as attendees. The retained evidence is text-attributed reporting; signature images and the executed agreement were not acquired. The displayed account alias was not independently reconciled to the government-linked profile.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-reported-agreement-signing",
              "w29-enf-e-reported-police-signing",
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-attendance",
              "w29-enf-e-sky-attendance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Displayed IPO accounts describe an annual2026/27 Service Agreement as the first of the three-year funding arrangement; main metadata29May2026 does not fix the event day. Contract and signature images not obtained; account alias not independently authenticated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-reported-agreement-signing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed participation in signing the2026/27Service Agreement",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": "Post metadata29May2026; event described as that week"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Post identifies Dan/Daniel Guthrie as attendee. Alliance About page supports his role. Attendance is not evidence of being a contracting signatory, contributing money or approving police priorities.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-attendance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed attendance through its Director General",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Caption/body names Adam Williams and Pete O’Doherty in the signing account. This is text-attributed event evidence, not visual verification of signatures or an executed agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-reported-police-signing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "City of London Police",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed participation in the annual agreement signing",
            "sourceName": "City of London Police",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Post identifies Matthew Hibbert, Sky Anti-Piracy Director. No executed contract, payment or police decision right follows from attendance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-sky-attendance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sky anti-piracy participation — attributed event role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was attributed attendance",
            "sourceName": "Sky anti-piracy participation — attributed event role",
            "targetName": "Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
      "label": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Official case page published Alliance/BPI responses on8December2020. Earlier31July deadline is not a submission date. Publication is not adoption of KYBC proposals.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government process"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
        "name": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
        "role": "Government process",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Official case page published Alliance/BPI responses on8December2020. Earlier31July deadline is not a submission date. Publication is not adoption of KYBC proposals.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official case page published Alliance/BPI responses on8December2020. Earlier31July deadline is not a submission date. Publication is not adoption of KYBC proposals."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official case page published Alliance/BPI responses on8December2020. Earlier31July deadline is not a submission date. Publication is not adoption of KYBC proposals.",
        "structuralRole": "Government process",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cma-published-alliance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the response on8December2020",
            "sourceName": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
            "targetName": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "date": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
      "label": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Proposes robust verification of business customers across critical online services and loss of hosting/payment access for illicit businesses withholding identity. Document predates RUSI2021; not a universal consumer age-ID scheme.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
        "name": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Proposes robust verification of business customers across critical online services and loss of hosting/payment access for illicit businesses withholding identity. Document predates RUSI2021; not a universal consumer age-ID scheme.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposes robust verification of business customers across critical online services and loss of hosting/payment access for illicit businesses withholding identity. Document predates RUSI2021; not a universal consumer age-ID scheme."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the Alliance for Intellectual Property's business-verification proposal in its response to the CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internally dated August 2020. It advocates stronger identity checks by critical online services and consequences for businesses withholding identifying information.",
        "structuralRole": "Early documented proposal linking identity verification to infrastructure access",
        "significance": "The proposal locates accountability at the service relationship: hosting, advertising and payments can require a commercial customer to identify itself. That mechanism is broader than removing a single infringing page because failure to supply identity information could affect the business's access to essential services.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Document and policy status",
            "text": "The CMA published the response on 8 December 2020; that date is not its receipt date or a decision adopting it. The proposal predates RUSI's March 2021 report. The Alliance's separately captured Online Accountability page advocates verification across hosts, advertising, proxies, payment services and marketplaces. The records establish a continuing advocacy theme, without proving identical wording over time or an enacted general duty.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-business-proposal",
              "w29-enf-e-cma-published-alliance",
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-current-position"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Undated Online Accountability page supports KYBC across hosting, advertising, proxies, payments and marketplaces. This is a comparison to the dated proposal, not an asserted unchanged text/version chain or a current enacted duty.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-current-position"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
                "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains a similar business-verification position in current-captured material",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "date": "Observed9September2026; publication/update date unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "InternalAugust2020 document advocates stronger business identity checks and infrastructure/payment consequences. Exact submission day unknown;8December2020 is CMA publication, not filing or decision date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-business-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted a business-verification proposal in the CMA record",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "date": "InternalAugust2020; published8December2020"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cma-published-alliance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the response on8December2020",
            "sourceName": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
            "targetName": "Alliance KYBC proposal — internal August2020",
            "date": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
            "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
      "label": "BPI business-verification proposal — redacted November2020",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Section4.2.2 seeks name/address/contact and entity-responsible-person checks, bank details where appropriate, and stopping services for withheld/incorrect identity. That clause has no separate proved-infringement prerequisite.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
        "name": "BPI business-verification proposal — redacted November2020",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Section4.2.2 seeks name/address/contact and entity-responsible-person checks, bank details where appropriate, and stopping services for withheld/incorrect identity. That clause has no separate proved-infringement prerequisite.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Section4.2.2 seeks name/address/contact and entity-responsible-person checks, bank details where appropriate, and stopping services for withheld/incorrect identity. That clause has no separate proved-infringement prerequisite."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Section4.2.2 seeks name/address/contact and entity-responsible-person checks, bank details where appropriate, and stopping services for withheld/incorrect identity. That clause has no separate proved-infringement prerequisite.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public redacted versionNovember2020 specifies identity/contact/entity-person checks and conditional bank details. The operative proposal stops service for withheld/incorrect information without separately requiring proved infringement in that clause. Scope is business customers, not every consumer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-bpi-business-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BPI — recorded-music trade body",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "proposed stopping services for withheld or incorrect business identity",
            "sourceName": "BPI — recorded-music trade body",
            "targetName": "BPI business-verification proposal — redacted November2020",
            "date": "Redacted versionNovember2020; published8December2020"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-cma-published-bpi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the response on8December2020",
            "sourceName": "CMA Digital Markets Taskforce — 2020 consultation",
            "targetName": "BPI business-verification proposal — redacted November2020",
            "date": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-alliance-osb2021",
      "label": "Alliance OSB0016 evidence — September2021",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Advocates business verification across infrastructure and asks parliament/government to find a legislative vehicle. Citation of CMA G22(13b) about unlawful activity/economic detriment does not establish CMA adoption of this KYBC wording.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Parliamentary submission"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-alliance-osb2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-alliance-osb2021",
        "name": "Alliance OSB0016 evidence — September2021",
        "role": "Parliamentary submission",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Advocates business verification across infrastructure and asks parliament/government to find a legislative vehicle. Citation of CMA G22(13b) about unlawful activity/economic detriment does not establish CMA adoption of this KYBC wording.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advocates business verification across infrastructure and asks parliament/government to find a legislative vehicle. Citation of CMA G22(13b) about unlawful activity/economic detriment does not establish CMA adoption of this KYBC wording."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Advocates business verification across infrastructure and asks parliament/government to find a legislative vehicle. Citation of CMA G22(13b) about unlawful activity/economic detriment does not establish CMA adoption of this KYBC wording.",
        "structuralRole": "Parliamentary submission",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "OSB0016 internalSeptember2021 asks for a suitable legislative vehicle across infrastructure. Its citation to broad CMA unlawful-activity concerns is not exact policy adoption. Original PDF not retained; complete three-page primary reader supports the claim.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-alliance-parliamentary-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocated a legislative business-verification duty to parliament",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Alliance OSB0016 evidence — September2021",
            "date": "InternalSeptember2021; exact publication day unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-cic-rightsholders",
      "label": "Rightsholders on CIC IP subgroup — briefing authors",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Authorship attributed in MPA annex to rightsholder organisations on the Creative Industries Council IP subgroup. It is not demonstrated endorsement by the full CIC, all its members or government.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-cic-rightsholders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-cic-rightsholders",
        "name": "Rightsholders on CIC IP subgroup — briefing authors",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Authorship attributed in MPA annex to rightsholder organisations on the Creative Industries Council IP subgroup. It is not demonstrated endorsement by the full CIC, all its members or government.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authorship attributed in MPA annex to rightsholder organisations on the Creative Industries Council IP subgroup. It is not demonstrated endorsement by the full CIC, all its members or government."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Authorship attributed in MPA annex to rightsholder organisations on the Creative Industries Council IP subgroup. It is not demonstrated endorsement by the full CIC, all its members or government.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "MPA identifies rightsholder organisations on the CIC IP subgroup. The record does not demonstrate full-CIC or government adoption, nor independently verify a September2021 public tabling date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rightsholder-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is attributed authorship of the annexed KYBC briefing",
            "sourceName": "Rightsholders on CIC IP subgroup — briefing authors",
            "targetName": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
            "date": "Annex-labelledSeptember2021; carried in2022document"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
      "label": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Commercial-customer verification across platforms, hosting/CDNs, DNS/registrars, proxies, email, finance and advertising; failure or inability to verify would stop service. Detailed challenge mechanics not specified in the inspected Q1–5.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
        "name": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
        "role": "Policy proposal",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Commercial-customer verification across platforms, hosting/CDNs, DNS/registrars, proxies, email, finance and advertising; failure or inability to verify would stop service. Detailed challenge mechanics not specified in the inspected Q1–5.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Commercial-customer verification across platforms, hosting/CDNs, DNS/registrars, proxies, email, finance and advertising; failure or inability to verify would stop service. Detailed challenge mechanics not specified in the inspected Q1–5."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Commercial-customer verification across platforms, hosting/CDNs, DNS/registrars, proxies, email, finance and advertising; failure or inability to verify would stop service. Detailed challenge mechanics not specified in the inspected Q1–5.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Annex is an actual documentary transmission, broader than a similarity inference. Q1–5 includes stopping services where a commercial customer fails or cannot be verified. This does not create duties or establish accepted wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-carried-briefing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reproduced the rightsholder briefing as an annex",
            "sourceName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "targetName": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
            "date": "Internal10May2022; annex-labelledSeptember2021"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "MPA identifies rightsholder organisations on the CIC IP subgroup. The record does not demonstrate full-CIC or government adoption, nor independently verify a September2021 public tabling date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rightsholder-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rightsholders on CIC IP subgroup — briefing authors",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is attributed authorship of the annexed KYBC briefing",
            "sourceName": "Rightsholders on CIC IP subgroup — briefing authors",
            "targetName": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
            "date": "Annex-labelledSeptember2021; carried in2022document"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
      "label": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Carries rightsholder briefing, asks departments to join IPO forum, and quotes RUSI2021. Internal document date is not independently established publication day or proof of acceptance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Parliamentary submission"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
        "name": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
        "role": "Parliamentary submission",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Carries rightsholder briefing, asks departments to join IPO forum, and quotes RUSI2021. Internal document date is not independently established publication day or proof of acceptance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Carries rightsholder briefing, asks departments to join IPO forum, and quotes RUSI2021. Internal document date is not independently established publication day or proof of acceptance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "MPA's FDF0068 parliamentary submission, internally dated 10 May 2022, advocates business-verification duties and wider participation in IPO's cross-government forum. It carries an annexed rights-holder briefing and cites RUSI's 2021 intellectual-property-crime report.",
        "structuralRole": "Documented transmission of verification proposals into parliamentary evidence",
        "significance": "The submission supplies a concrete policy-circulation route: a report acknowledged as co-funded by MPA is later quoted in MPA evidence, alongside a detailed proposal. That is stronger evidence of transmission than similar language alone. It still does not establish that funders dictated the research or government adopted the proposal.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Content and citation",
            "text": "The annex's questions and answers include stopping services when a commercial customer fails or cannot be verified. Section 18 and footnote 12 cite RUSI and quote its executive-summary verification passage, which is not identical to numbered recommendation 4. MPA also asks the committee to encourage departments to join the IPO forum. The internal document date is preserved without treating it as a verified publication day or acceptance decision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-parliamentary-evidence",
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-carried-briefing",
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation",
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-forum-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Main§18 and footnote12 name and cite this report, quoting its executive-summary KYBC passage. That is a concrete co-funder→report→later-citation route. Quotation is from PDF12 executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation4; funding did not itself prove dictation or government adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "quotes the2021 report in parliamentary advocacy",
            "sourceName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "MPA internal10May2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Annex is an actual documentary transmission, broader than a similarity inference. Q1–5 includes stopping services where a commercial customer fails or cannot be verified. This does not create duties or establish accepted wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-carried-briefing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reproduced the rightsholder briefing as an annex",
            "sourceName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "targetName": "Rightsholder KYBC briefing — annex-labelled September2021",
            "date": "Internal10May2022; annex-labelledSeptember2021"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FDF0068 internal10May2022 asks departments to join the IPO forum and enact business-verification duties. Internal date is preserved without manufacturing a publication day or acceptance result.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-parliamentary-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Motion Picture Association",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted evidence advocating KYBC and cross-department coordination",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "date": "Internal10May2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "MPA asks the Committee to encourage cross-government participation. This is a request, not proof every named department joined or approved its proposed cessation rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-forum-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "asks departments to join and advance KYBC work",
            "sourceName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "targetName": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "date": "Internal10May2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-rusi",
      "label": "Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Publisher of the March2021 corrected Whitehall report. Funding and research methodology are disclosed by the report; commissioning contracts, funder clearance or item-level direction were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research organization"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-rusi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-rusi",
        "name": "Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)",
        "role": "Research organization",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Publisher of the March2021 corrected Whitehall report. Funding and research methodology are disclosed by the report; commissioning contracts, funder clearance or item-level direction were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Publisher of the March2021 corrected Whitehall report. Funding and research methodology are disclosed by the report; commissioning contracts, funder clearance or item-level direction were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Publisher of the March2021 corrected Whitehall report. Funding and research methodology are disclosed by the report; commissioning contracts, funder clearance or item-level direction were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Research organization",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Corrected March2021 report names authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko. The authors claim findings were independent of funders;77interviews and two funder-excluding validation workshops are self-described methods. Funding, primary-data contribution and final editorial control are not interchangeable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the co-funded research report",
            "sourceName": "Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 corrected version"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-industry-trust",
      "label": "Industry Trust — report-disclosed funder",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Name printed in the RUSI funding disclosure. Exact legal entity/award agreement not obtained; no automatic reconciliation to another similarly named body.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Named funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-industry-trust",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-industry-trust",
        "name": "Industry Trust — report-disclosed funder",
        "role": "Named funder",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Name printed in the RUSI funding disclosure. Exact legal entity/award agreement not obtained; no automatic reconciliation to another similarly named body.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Name printed in the RUSI funding disclosure. Exact legal entity/award agreement not obtained; no automatic reconciliation to another similarly named body."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Name printed in the RUSI funding disclosure. Exact legal entity/award agreement not obtained; no automatic reconciliation to another similarly named body.",
        "structuralRole": "Named funder",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
            "sourceName": "Industry Trust — report-disclosed funder",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 report disclosure"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-premier-league",
      "label": "Premier League — report-disclosed funder",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named RUSI co-funder; amount, payment date and editorial/approval rights are not disclosed in the inspected report.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Named funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-premier-league",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-premier-league",
        "name": "Premier League — report-disclosed funder",
        "role": "Named funder",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named RUSI co-funder; amount, payment date and editorial/approval rights are not disclosed in the inspected report.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named RUSI co-funder; amount, payment date and editorial/approval rights are not disclosed in the inspected report."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named RUSI co-funder; amount, payment date and editorial/approval rights are not disclosed in the inspected report.",
        "structuralRole": "Named funder",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
            "sourceName": "Premier League — report-disclosed funder",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 report disclosure"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko disclose five co-funders and claim independent findings. Reported77 interviews Feb–Sep2020; two January2021 validation workshops excluded funders. These are reported methods, not an external audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research output"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "name": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
        "role": "Research output",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko disclose five co-funders and claim independent findings. Reported77 interviews Feb–Sep2020; two January2021 validation workshops excluded funders. These are reported methods, not an external audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko disclose five co-funders and claim independent findings. Reported77 interviews Feb–Sep2020; two January2021 validation workshops excluded funders. These are reported methods, not an external audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime is a RUSI report by Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko, retained in its corrected March 2021 version. It proposes financial and business-verification responses to intellectual-property crime.",
        "structuralRole": "Research source connecting co-funders and later policy advocacy",
        "significance": "The report offers proposals that can travel from research into consultations and parliamentary evidence. MPA's later citation supplies a documented example of that movement. Funding disclosure identifies the supporting institutional interests, while the authors' methods and independence statement address a different question from contractual editorial control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Methods, support and proposals",
            "text": "The authors report seventy-seven interviews from February to September 2020 and two January 2021 validation workshops excluding funders. They acknowledge IPO, the Alliance for Intellectual Property, MPA, the Industry Trust and the Premier League. No allocations or payment instruments were acquired. Recommendations include business-identity records and verification where possible, financial institutions using existing lists with appropriate responses, and identity best practice before formal requirements. These are authored recommendations, not completed disruptions or statutory duties.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recommendation4 seeks record/verification to extent possible and resources for compliance. Recommendation14 proposes that financial institutions seek existing lists and take appropriate actions including termination orSAR. Recommendation15 promotes reasonable identity best practice without waiting for formal KYBC. These are authored proposals, not established list entitlements or performed disruptions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RUSI business-verification and financial-disruption recommendations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends verification and proportionate financial interventions",
            "sourceName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "targetName": "RUSI business-verification and financial-disruption recommendations",
            "date": "March2021 corrected report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Corrected March2021 report names authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko. The authors claim findings were independent of funders;77interviews and two funder-excluding validation workshops are self-described methods. Funding, primary-data contribution and final editorial control are not interchangeable.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published the co-funded research report",
            "sourceName": "Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 corrected version"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Main§18 and footnote12 name and cite this report, quoting its executive-summary KYBC passage. That is a concrete co-funder→report→later-citation route. Quotation is from PDF12 executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation4; funding did not itself prove dictation or government adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              },
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "quotes the2021 report in parliamentary advocacy",
            "sourceName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "MPA internal10May2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Intellectual Property",
            "targetName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "date": "March2021 report disclosure"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
      "label": "RUSI business-verification and financial-disruption recommendations",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Recommendation4 seeks identity recording/verification to extent possible and compliance resources;14 recommends financial institutions seek named lists and take appropriate action including termination/SAR;15 suggests reasonable identity best practice even without formal KYBC. Recommendations do not prove list access, enforcement or adoption.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy recommendations"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
        "name": "RUSI business-verification and financial-disruption recommendations",
        "role": "Policy recommendations",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Recommendation4 seeks identity recording/verification to extent possible and compliance resources;14 recommends financial institutions seek named lists and take appropriate action including termination/SAR;15 suggests reasonable identity best practice even without formal KYBC. Recommendations do not prove list access, enforcement or adoption.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recommendation4 seeks identity recording/verification to extent possible and compliance resources;14 recommends financial institutions seek named lists and take appropriate action including termination/SAR;15 suggests reasonable identity best practice even without formal KYBC. Recommendations do not prove list access, enforcement or adoption."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recommendation4 seeks identity recording/verification to extent possible and compliance resources;14 recommends financial institutions seek named lists and take appropriate action including termination/SAR;15 suggests reasonable identity best practice even without formal KYBC. Recommendations do not prove list access, enforcement or adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy recommendations",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recommendation4 seeks record/verification to extent possible and resources for compliance. Recommendation14 proposes that financial institutions seek existing lists and take appropriate actions including termination orSAR. Recommendation15 promotes reasonable identity best practice without waiting for formal KYBC. These are authored proposals, not established list entitlements or performed disruptions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
                "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends verification and proportionate financial interventions",
            "sourceName": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report",
            "targetName": "RUSI business-verification and financial-disruption recommendations",
            "date": "March2021 corrected report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
            "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
      "label": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Government response/strategy and FY2022/23 report describe consideration and several Whitehall forums. Membership invitation and policy exploration are distinct from approved wording, statutory power or private authorship of a decision.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government process"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-kybc-forum",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
        "name": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
        "role": "Government process",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Government response/strategy and FY2022/23 report describe consideration and several Whitehall forums. Membership invitation and policy exploration are distinct from approved wording, statutory power or private authorship of a decision.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Government response/strategy and FY2022/23 report describe consideration and several Whitehall forums. Membership invitation and policy exploration are distinct from approved wording, statutory power or private authorship of a decision."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject represents the documented cross-government consideration of know-your-business-customer proposals coordinated through IPO-related forums. The records describe deliberation about verifying commercial users of online infrastructure, rather than a completed general identity-checking regime.",
        "structuralRole": "Government consideration point for rights-holder verification proposals",
        "significance": "The forum route connects outside proposals to departmental discussion. That is a meaningful institutional step, but invitation, participation and adoption are different events. The retained sources show that government considered the issue while leaving the approved wording, enforcement design and meeting decisions unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The public record of consideration",
            "text": "The government's response to the music-streaming inquiry, received on 15 September and published on 22 September 2021, says concerns were being considered across departments. The 2022 counter-infringement strategy and 2022/23 annual report describe further Whitehall forums. MPA's May 2022 parliamentary evidence asks for wider departmental participation. Its request does not establish that every department joined or accepted the annexed service-cessation proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
              },
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-music-kybc-consideration",
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-kybc-forums",
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-forum-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
              "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
              "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Response to recommendation23 received15September/published22September2021 says government is considering concerns across departments. No final KYBC obligation, verifier, sanction or appeal is created by this text; no exclusive Alliance/MPA drafting path asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-music-kybc-consideration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Government music-streaming response — recommendation23",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records government attention and IPO-led consideration",
            "sourceName": "Government music-streaming response — recommendation23",
            "targetName": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "date": "2021-09-22 – 2021-09-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "MPA asks the Committee to encourage cross-government participation. This is a request, not proof every named department joined or approved its proposed cessation rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-mpa-forum-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "asks departments to join and advance KYBC work",
            "sourceName": "MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022",
            "targetName": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "date": "Internal10May2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2022strategy and FY2022/23 report explicitly describe KYBC consideration and several Whitehall forums. MPA requests more departmental participation but is not thereby author of government policy or a voting member. Actual meeting dispositions/approved drafting remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-ipo-kybc-forums"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
              },
              {
                "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported cross-departmental KYBC work",
            "sourceName": "UK Intellectual Property Office",
            "targetName": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "date": "2022strategy andFY2022/23report; exact meeting dates unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
            "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
            "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity"
          },
          {
            "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
            "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-music-response2021",
      "label": "Government music-streaming response — recommendation23",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Received15September/published22September2021: records KYBC concerns, government attention and IPO cross-department consideration. It does not create a verifier, sanction or appeal route.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government response"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-music-response2021",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-music-response2021",
        "name": "Government music-streaming response — recommendation23",
        "role": "Government response",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Received15September/published22September2021: records KYBC concerns, government attention and IPO cross-department consideration. It does not create a verifier, sanction or appeal route.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Received15September/published22September2021: records KYBC concerns, government attention and IPO cross-department consideration. It does not create a verifier, sanction or appeal route."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Received15September/published22September2021: records KYBC concerns, government attention and IPO cross-department consideration. It does not create a verifier, sanction or appeal route.",
        "structuralRole": "Government response",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Response to recommendation23 received15September/published22September2021 says government is considering concerns across departments. No final KYBC obligation, verifier, sanction or appeal is created by this text; no exclusive Alliance/MPA drafting path asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-music-kybc-consideration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records government attention and IPO-led consideration",
            "sourceName": "Government music-streaming response — recommendation23",
            "targetName": "IPO cross-departmental KYBC consideration",
            "date": "2021-09-22 – 2021-09-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-sector-vision2023",
      "label": "Sector Vision June2023 — explore KYBC potential",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Following roundtables, government says it will engage technology/creative sectors to explore potential KYBC solutions. Adjacent departmental work does not allocate final legal powers or establish adopted text.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-sector-vision2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-sector-vision2023",
        "name": "Sector Vision June2023 — explore KYBC potential",
        "role": "Government policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Following roundtables, government says it will engage technology/creative sectors to explore potential KYBC solutions. Adjacent departmental work does not allocate final legal powers or establish adopted text.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Following roundtables, government says it will engage technology/creative sectors to explore potential KYBC solutions. Adjacent departmental work does not allocate final legal powers or establish adopted text."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Following roundtables, government says it will engage technology/creative sectors to explore potential KYBC solutions. Adjacent departmental work does not allocate final legal powers or establish adopted text.",
        "structuralRole": "Government policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "June2023 Sector Vision says government will work with technology and creative sectors after roundtables to explore KYBC potential. The item does not supply enacted duties, accepted text or departmental sanction powers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-sector-vision-exploration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published further exploration of potential KYBC solutions",
            "sourceName": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "targetName": "Sector Vision June2023 — explore KYBC potential",
            "date": "June2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
      "label": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Named in current-period advertising/creative-policy records. Kept separate from the inherited historically named Digital,Culture,Media and Sport buyer node because this run did not acquire institutional succession/contract novation records.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government department"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-dcms-current",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
        "name": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
        "role": "Government department",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named in current-period advertising/creative-policy records. Kept separate from the inherited historically named Digital,Culture,Media and Sport buyer node because this run did not acquire institutional succession/contract novation records.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in current-period advertising/creative-policy records. Kept separate from the inherited historically named Digital,Culture,Media and Sport buyer node because this run did not acquire institutional succession/contract novation records."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Department for Culture, Media and Sport appears here in 2023–2026 advertising and creative-industry policy records. This is the current-period policy role, kept distinct from the historically named Digital, Culture, Media and Sport CDDP buyer.",
        "structuralRole": "Departmental partner in advertising accountability policy",
        "significance": "DCMS links creative-industry concerns to online-service and advertising policy. Its records move from exploring business verification to proposed advertising duties and a joint anti-fraud work programme. These are different policy stages, so the sequence should not be treated as a single enacted infrastructure-disconnection regime.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Exploration, proposals and partnership",
            "text": "The June 2023 Creative Industries Sector Vision commits to exploring know-your-business-customer approaches with technology and creative sectors. The July 2023 advertising consultation response proposes duties for platforms, intermediaries and publishers concerning paid-for or reciprocal illegal ads, with further consultation and legislation still required. Direct advertisers, owned media and free classifieds have different treatment. The March 2026 Fraud Strategy names DCMS with the Home Office and IAB UK in a partnership due to report to ministers in early 2027.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-sector-vision-exploration",
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-proposal",
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-dcms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July2023 response proposes paid-for/reciprocal illegal-ad duties on platforms/intermediaries/publishers plus a separate under18 strand. Direct advertisers are excluded from the proposed new regime, with checks shaped through PIP measures. Owned media/free classifieds excluded. More consultation and legislation subject to parliamentary time remained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published proposed systems duties and regulatory design",
            "sourceName": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
            "date": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "June2023 Sector Vision says government will work with technology and creative sectors after roundtables to explore KYBC potential. The item does not supply enacted duties, accepted text or departmental sanction powers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-sector-vision-exploration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sector Vision June2023 — explore KYBC potential",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published further exploration of potential KYBC solutions",
            "sourceName": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "targetName": "Sector Vision June2023 — explore KYBC potential",
            "date": "June2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Same March2026 account names DCMS and IABUK. No hidden transfer of statutory powers or responsibility to industry established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-dcms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named a launcher alongside Home Office",
            "sourceName": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-oap2023",
      "label": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Proposed statutory systems duties on platforms, intermediaries and publishers for paid/reciprocal illegal advertising and a separate under18 product strand. Advertisers excluded from direct new regime; identity checks would be necessary/appropriate and designed by regulators. Not enacted by this response.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-oap2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-oap2023",
        "name": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
        "role": "Government proposal",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Proposed statutory systems duties on platforms, intermediaries and publishers for paid/reciprocal illegal advertising and a separate under18 product strand. Advertisers excluded from direct new regime; identity checks would be necessary/appropriate and designed by regulators. Not enacted by this response.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposed statutory systems duties on platforms, intermediaries and publishers for paid/reciprocal illegal advertising and a separate under18 product strand. Advertisers excluded from direct new regime; identity checks would be necessary/appropriate and designed by regulators. Not enacted by this response."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Proposed statutory systems duties on platforms, intermediaries and publishers for paid/reciprocal illegal advertising and a separate under18 product strand. Advertisers excluded from direct new regime; identity checks would be necessary/appropriate and designed by regulators. Not enacted by this response.",
        "structuralRole": "Government proposal",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "July2023 response proposes paid-for/reciprocal illegal-ad duties on platforms/intermediaries/publishers plus a separate under18 strand. Direct advertisers are excluded from the proposed new regime, with checks shaped through PIP measures. Owned media/free classifieds excluded. More consultation and legislation subject to parliamentary time remained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published proposed systems duties and regulatory design",
            "sourceName": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
            "date": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government response makes identity verification necessary/appropriate and leaves extent to future regulators. It favours good-practice incentives rather than punishing every breach. These are government design choices distinct from respondents’ pre-vetting/SME/privacy concerns. This is a proposed regime design, not a completed regulator decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-check-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OAP proposed identity-check design",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets limits on proposed identity-check design",
            "sourceName": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
            "targetName": "OAP proposed identity-check design",
            "date": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The acquired government record establishes that KYBC reached the policy agenda and cross-departmental discussion. It does not establish adoption of the IP groups' broader proposal requiring underlying commercial infrastructure providers to verify all business customers and stop serving those they cannot verify. A related but narrower advertiser-verification proposal appears in the 2023 Online Advertising Programme response. Separately, the March 2026 Fraud Strategy describes a current government/IAB UK partnership with an early-2027 report-back and conditional legislation, alongside a distinct statutory fraudulent-advertising regime whose commencement was then expected in 2027. Do not merge these into one enacted KYBC instrument or attribute the advertising pathway to Alliance without a transmission record.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Advertising Programme response"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c3ba47543659f913b8e4122647ccf6d629eb0762137cfd525cf648e862d8f252"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-oat",
      "label": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Public minutes record members agreeing draft working-group terms/year plan, not statutory enforcement authority. Advertising dispositions are kept separate from Alliance/IPO KYBC pathways without an explicit transmission record.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Coordination body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-oat",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-oat",
        "name": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
        "role": "Coordination body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Public minutes record members agreeing draft working-group terms/year plan, not statutory enforcement authority. Advertising dispositions are kept separate from Alliance/IPO KYBC pathways without an explicit transmission record.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public minutes record members agreeing draft working-group terms/year plan, not statutory enforcement authority. Advertising dispositions are kept separate from Alliance/IPO KYBC pathways without an explicit transmission record."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Online Advertising Taskforce is the UK coordination setting for government and industry work on advertising harms. Its February 2026 minutes record agreement to a working-group plan, while the March Fraud Strategy places an anti-fraud partnership under it.",
        "structuralRole": "Forum organising standards work before possible statutory intervention",
        "significance": "The taskforce connects departments and advertising-industry participants around practical standards and proposed interventions. Agreement to a work plan is an observable collective decision, although its authority is narrower than compelling verification or disconnecting a business. A promised ministerial report gives this coordination a defined policy destination.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What was agreed and what remained ahead",
            "text": "The 26 February 2026 minutes record agreement to draft terms and a yearly plan for a group established after the November 2025 meeting. The March strategy names the Home Office, DCMS and IAB UK as partners and anticipates a report in early 2027. It commits conditionally to legislation if industry measures prove insufficient. The full terms, individual votes, completed report and any resulting legislation were not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-taskforce-workplan-agreement",
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-home-office",
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-dcms",
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-iab",
              "w29-enf-e-conditional-advertising-legislation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government says partnership reports to ministers early2027 and it will legislate within this Parliament if industry/market measures are insufficient. This is a conditional policy commitment, not an enacted new power, a finding of failure or an identified bill.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-conditional-advertising-legislation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes report-back and conditional future legislation",
            "sourceName": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy; report expectedearly2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minutes record agreement of the draft after setup followingNovember2025 meeting. The record does not identify individual votes, full terms, compulsory powers or completed enforcement outcomes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-taskforce-workplan-agreement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded members agreeing draft terms and year plan",
            "sourceName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "targetName": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
            "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "March2026 strategy§55 says Home Office andDCMS launched a partnership withIABUK under the taskforce, to report to ministers early2027. This dated account is not an accepted report/output or compulsory identity regime.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-home-office"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Home Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named a launcher of the anti-fraud advertising partnership",
            "sourceName": "UK Home Office",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Government describes the partnership and future report-back. No financial contribution or veto is disclosed in the inspected passage.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-iab"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IAB UK",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named industry partner for anti-fraud work",
            "sourceName": "IAB UK",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Same March2026 account names DCMS and IABUK. No hidden transfer of statutory powers or responsibility to industry established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-dcms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named a launcher alongside Home Office",
            "sourceName": "Department for Culture, Media and Sport — 2023/26 policy role",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
      "label": "IAB UK",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named partner in the anti-fraud advertising initiative and presenter of working-group design. Industry participation and an agreed workplan do not confer regulator or court powers.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Industry body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-iab-uk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
        "name": "IAB UK",
        "role": "Industry body",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named partner in the anti-fraud advertising initiative and presenter of working-group design. Industry participation and an agreed workplan do not confer regulator or court powers.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named partner in the anti-fraud advertising initiative and presenter of working-group design. Industry participation and an agreed workplan do not confer regulator or court powers."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "IAB UK is an advertising-industry organisation participating in the government's anti-fraud advertising partnership. It also publishes practical guidance encouraging advertisers to use PIPCU's Infringing Website List in contracts and workflows.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry bridge between policy coordination and advertising practice",
        "significance": "IAB UK connects discussion of advertising standards to organisations that can alter buying and contractual routines. Presenting a work plan or recommending a list can shape practice without granting the body regulatory powers. The useful question is which recommendations become accepted terms or implemented systems.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented participation",
            "text": "Minutes of the 26 February 2026 Online Advertising Taskforce meeting record Sinead Coogan-Jobes presenting draft terms and a yearly plan for the Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group; members agreed the draft. The forthcoming mapping exercise concerned mechanisms to detect, disrupt and prevent malicious advertising. Separately, IAB's IWL guide recommends contractual and workflow use with PIPCU authorisation. The retained records contain neither the full working-group terms nor an executed advertiser agreement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
                "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-iab-working-group-proposal",
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-iab",
              "w30-class-e-iab-contracts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "26February2026 minutes attribute presentation to IAB UK’s Sinead Coogan-Jobes. Terms were not acquired; presentation is not regulatory authority or proof of completed standards/disruption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-iab-working-group-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "presented draft terms and year plan to the taskforce",
            "sourceName": "IAB UK",
            "targetName": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
            "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "IAB recommends incorporating IWL data in advertising contracts/workflows and requesting PIPCU authorization. No executed advertiser agreement was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iab-contracts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
                "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends IWL in contracts and processes",
            "sourceName": "IAB UK",
            "targetName": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Government describes the partnership and future report-back. No financial contribution or veto is disclosed in the inspected passage.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-iab"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was named industry partner for anti-fraud work",
            "sourceName": "IAB UK",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway",
            "heading": "4. An implemented deliberative mechanism, not enacted KYBC: February/March 2026",
            "text": "Section4 records that Sinead Coogan-Jobes of IAB UK presented the new Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group's draft terms of reference and yearly plan, which taskforce members agreed. The group had been set up following the November2025 meeting. Its forthcoming mapping exercise would identify standards/mechanisms to detect, disrupt and prevent malicious advertising entering the supply chain. This is actual reported collective approval of a work plan; the precise terms themselves were not acquired, and these minutes do not grant the group powers to compel verification or disconnection.",
            "matched": [
              "IAB UK"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "67041ceeb11c8271bef8b23f8f464fde274736236f5e2593dac1cfea70106462"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway",
            "heading": "4. An implemented deliberative mechanism, not enacted KYBC: February/March 2026",
            "text": "Paragraph55 says wider programmatic advertising largely falls outside the then-current Online Safety Act scope. It reports Home Office and DCMS launching a partnership with IAB UK under the taskforce, reporting to ministers in early2027. If industry partnership and market incentives are insufficient, the government says it will legislate within this Parliament. This supports a current-at-publication policy pathway and a conditional legislative threat, not a commenced blanket KYBC rule. It does not identify the IPO forum as author or describe the broader infrastructure proposal as accepted or rejected wholesale.",
            "matched": [
              "IAB UK"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "04272e3e1cf3e17c083ae4cfa14ffb75296b6081639112166e9cee092bc21667"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
      "label": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "26February2026 minutes record taskforce members agreeing draft terms/year plan presented by IAB UK. Actual terms not acquired; future work to map standards and disrupt malicious ads is not a demonstrated outcome.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Working group"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
        "name": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
        "role": "Working group",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "26February2026 minutes record taskforce members agreeing draft terms/year plan presented by IAB UK. Actual terms not acquired; future work to map standards and disrupt malicious ads is not a demonstrated outcome.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "26February2026 minutes record taskforce members agreeing draft terms/year plan presented by IAB UK. Actual terms not acquired; future work to map standards and disrupt malicious ads is not a demonstrated outcome."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "26February2026 minutes record taskforce members agreeing draft terms/year plan presented by IAB UK. Actual terms not acquired; future work to map standards and disrupt malicious ads is not a demonstrated outcome.",
        "structuralRole": "Working group",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Minutes record agreement of the draft after setup followingNovember2025 meeting. The record does not identify individual votes, full terms, compulsory powers or completed enforcement outcomes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-taskforce-workplan-agreement"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recorded members agreeing draft terms and year plan",
            "sourceName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "targetName": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
            "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "26February2026 minutes attribute presentation to IAB UK’s Sinead Coogan-Jobes. Terms were not acquired; presentation is not regulatory authority or proof of completed standards/disruption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-iab-working-group-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IAB UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "presented draft terms and year plan to the taskforce",
            "sourceName": "IAB UK",
            "targetName": "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group",
            "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway",
            "heading": "4. An implemented deliberative mechanism, not enacted KYBC: February/March 2026",
            "text": "Section4 records that Sinead Coogan-Jobes of IAB UK presented the new Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group's draft terms of reference and yearly plan, which taskforce members agreed. The group had been set up following the November2025 meeting. Its forthcoming mapping exercise would identify standards/mechanisms to detect, disrupt and prevent malicious advertising entering the supply chain. This is actual reported collective approval of a work plan; the precise terms themselves were not acquired, and these minutes do not grant the group powers to compel verification or disconnection.",
            "matched": [
              "Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "67041ceeb11c8271bef8b23f8f464fde274736236f5e2593dac1cfea70106462"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
      "label": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Paragraph55 describes Home Office/DCMS/IAB partnership reporting to ministers early2027 and conditional legislation if inadequate. Paragraph54 separately describes enacted OSA duties and then-future timetable; this source is not a fresh September2026 commencement audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government strategy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
        "name": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
        "role": "Government strategy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Paragraph55 describes Home Office/DCMS/IAB partnership reporting to ministers early2027 and conditional legislation if inadequate. Paragraph54 separately describes enacted OSA duties and then-future timetable; this source is not a fresh September2026 commencement audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Paragraph55 describes Home Office/DCMS/IAB partnership reporting to ministers early2027 and conditional legislation if inadequate. Paragraph54 separately describes enacted OSA duties and then-future timetable; this source is not a fresh September2026 commencement audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject is the advertising account in the UK government's March 2026 Fraud Strategy. It describes an industry-government partnership, possible future legislation and the then-expected timetable for a separate Online Safety Act fraudulent-advertising strand.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy commitment connecting voluntary industry work to possible legislation",
        "significance": "The strategy gives the partnership a political consequence: government says it will legislate within the Parliament if industry and market measures prove inadequate. That can influence participation before legislation exists. It also separates wider programmatic advertising from duties already addressed through the Online Safety Act.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated commitments and timetable",
            "text": "Paragraph 55 describes a Home Office, DCMS and IAB UK partnership reporting to ministers in early 2027, followed by conditional legislation if necessary. Paragraph 54 separately discusses Category 1 and 2A duties and court business-disruption measures for serious statutory noncompliance. In March, consultation was envisaged for summer 2026 and commencement for 2027. This is the strategy's dated account, not verification that those later milestones occurred.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-conditional-advertising-legislation",
              "w29-enf-e-fraud-strategy-osa-account",
              "w29-enf-e-march2026-ofcom-timetable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government says partnership reports to ministers early2027 and it will legislate within this Parliament if industry/market measures are insufficient. This is a conditional policy commitment, not an enacted new power, a finding of failure or an identified bill.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-conditional-advertising-legislation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes report-back and conditional future legislation",
            "sourceName": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "targetName": "Online Advertising Taskforce",
            "date": "March2026 strategy; report expectedearly2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph54 describes Category1/2A duties and serious-noncompliance court business-disruption mechanisms. Such measures respond to breach of statutory duties, not simply an unverified business. This is the strategy’s legal account, not a new independent statute audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-fraud-strategy-osa-account"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Online Safety Act 2023",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "separately describes enacted fraudulent-advertising duties",
            "sourceName": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "targetName": "UK Online Safety Act 2023",
            "date": "March2026 strategy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "In March2026 the strategy said Ofcom aimed to consult in summer2026 with commencement expected2027 for the fraudulent-advertising strand. This must not be read as a verified September2026 status, a deadline-derived event date or the commencement of all OSA duties.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-march2026-ofcom-timetable"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported then-planned consultation and expected2027commencement",
            "sourceName": "Fraud Strategy — March2026 advertising account",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": "March2026; expectations not observed milestones"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-advertising-check-design",
      "label": "OAP proposed identity-check design",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "July2023 response leaves the extent of necessary/appropriate checks to future regulatory design; no universal business verification or current regulator requirement established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed regulatory design"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w29-enf-advertising-check-design",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-advertising-check-design",
        "name": "OAP proposed identity-check design",
        "role": "Proposed regulatory design",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "July2023 response leaves the extent of necessary/appropriate checks to future regulatory design; no universal business verification or current regulator requirement established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "July2023 response leaves the extent of necessary/appropriate checks to future regulatory design; no universal business verification or current regulator requirement established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "business-identity-policy",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "July2023 response leaves the extent of necessary/appropriate checks to future regulatory design; no universal business verification or current regulator requirement established.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed regulatory design",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government response makes identity verification necessary/appropriate and leaves extent to future regulators. It favours good-practice incentives rather than punishing every breach. These are government design choices distinct from respondents’ pre-vetting/SME/privacy concerns. This is a proposed regime design, not a completed regulator decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w29-enf-e-advertising-check-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets limits on proposed identity-check design",
            "sourceName": "Online Advertising Programme response — July2023 proposals",
            "targetName": "OAP proposed identity-check design",
            "date": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
            "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-creative",
      "label": "Operation Creative",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Dated police procedure and later portal design; current deployment and case-level correction remain unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-creative",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-creative",
        "name": "Operation Creative",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Dated police procedure and later portal design; current deployment and case-level correction remain unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated police procedure and later portal design; current deployment and case-level correction remain unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Dated police procedure and later portal design; current deployment and case-level correction remain unverified.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The Head of Unit chooses tactics under this dated Creative procedure; no named current officeholder or imported Ashiko DCI rule is asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-tactics"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU Head of Unit — Creative tactic role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "determines tactics case by case",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU Head of Unit — Creative tactic role",
            "targetName": "Operation Creative",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Police attributes a58% decline in UK advertising and estimated GBP6m reduction in IWL-site advertising revenue from UK traffic, January–December2022, to White Bullet research. No original study, counterfactual or cash record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-estimate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplies police-published advertising estimate",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "Operation Creative",
            "date": "January–December2022"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction",
            "heading": "Attributed referrals and effects",
            "text": "The PRS for Music contribution , PDF 113 / printed 109, reports its Rights Protection Unit submitting 138 website referrals . This appears in the2018/19 report, but the Operation Creative paragraph does not specify the counting period; nearby2018 dates concern separate work. This establishes PRS's attributed exercised supply of referrals. It does not show that all 138 were accepted or identify the advertisements removed because of each referral. Its surrounding MAPS/search/app achievements are different channels and must not be counted as IWL results.",
            "matched": [
              "Operation Creative"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b286224872d266f7a0a888de42ad58c5cfc1fa1648232c15120c61d786f9efd3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-iwl",
      "label": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Police-assessed list for advertising decisions; distinct from domain suspension and CODA's same-acronym list.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-iwl",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-iwl",
        "name": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Police-assessed list for advertising decisions; distinct from domain suspension and CODA's same-acronym list.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Police-assessed list for advertising decisions; distinct from domain suspension and CODA's same-acronym list."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PIPCU's Infringing Website List is a police-assessed information resource used to guide advertising decisions concerning suspected infringement. It belongs to the Operation Creative route and is distinct from domain suspension or other organisations' similarly abbreviated lists.",
        "structuralRole": "Police-screened list linking infringement evidence to advertising revenue",
        "significance": "The IWL allows infringement assessments to reach buyers and intermediaries that can change advertising placement. The mechanism relies on circulation and recipient action, rather than necessarily removing a domain. That also means correction at the source list and restoration of advertising are separate stages.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Inclusion and removal in the dated account",
            "text": "The released Operation Creative case study says PIPCU checks the evidential standard before qualifying referrals are circulated for advertising action. It requires immediate removal when evidence shows the offences have ceased. The Gambling Commission encourages IWL use alongside its separate advertising licence condition. WIPO's 2019 framework cites IWL as a precedent, which does not itself establish a UK contributor agreement or active WIPO feed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
              "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
              "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PIPCU checks the evidential standard before qualifying referrals are circulated for advertising action. No prior adjudication condition is specified in this case study; this is not a comprehensive powers opinion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-screen"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "assesses qualifying referrals before distribution",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The dated procedure requires immediate removal on evidence that offences have ceased; no worked recipient-wide reversal or specific mistaken-original-entry test is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-removal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "removes immediately upon evidence offences ceased",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2017 announcement encourages IWL use alongside the separate licence condition. It does not make every IWL listing a universal legal prohibition.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gambling Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "encourages licensee access",
            "sourceName": "Gambling Commission",
            "targetName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "date": "2017-06-13 – 2017-06-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "WIPO2019 paragraph3 cites PIPCU's IWL as a precedent; this does not establish a UK contributor agreement or operational feed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited as national precedent",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": "2019-06-18 – 2019-06-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
      "label": "Creative rightsholders and nominated referrers",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Role class supplying evidence, not decision-makers by referral alone.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-creative-referrers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
        "name": "Creative rightsholders and nominated referrers",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Role class supplying evidence, not decision-makers by referral alone.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Role class supplying evidence, not decision-makers by referral alone."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Role class supplying evidence, not decision-makers by referral alone.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Released guidance requires investigation quality, lawful evidence and a rightsholder/nominee statement sufficient to support prosecution; referral alone does not approve a listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-evidence"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submit evidence for police assessment",
            "sourceName": "Creative rightsholders and nominated referrers",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "Revised070119MJB; released17September2021; current application unknown"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-creative-head",
      "label": "PIPCU Head of Unit — Creative tactic role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Decision role in the released guidance; not automatically Ashiko's DCI role or a current named officeholder.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-creative-head",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-creative-head",
        "name": "PIPCU Head of Unit — Creative tactic role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Decision role in the released guidance; not automatically Ashiko's DCI role or a current named officeholder.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Decision role in the released guidance; not automatically Ashiko's DCI role or a current named officeholder."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Decision role in the released guidance; not automatically Ashiko's DCI role or a current named officeholder.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The Head of Unit chooses tactics under this dated Creative procedure; no named current officeholder or imported Ashiko DCI rule is asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-tactics"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Creative",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "determines tactics case by case",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU Head of Unit — Creative tactic role",
            "targetName": "Operation Creative",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
      "label": "IWL advertising recipients",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Advertisers, agencies and intermediaries receiving/promoted to use IWL; choices and contractual duties require their own instruments.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-ad-recipients",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
        "name": "IWL advertising recipients",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Advertisers, agencies and intermediaries receiving/promoted to use IWL; choices and contractual duties require their own instruments.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advertisers, agencies and intermediaries receiving/promoted to use IWL; choices and contractual duties require their own instruments."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          },
          {
            "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Advertisers, agencies and intermediaries receiving/promoted to use IWL; choices and contractual duties require their own instruments.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The dated report and industry guide describe list distribution and authenticated access; receipt is distinct from adopted contracts and actual advertising action.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
                "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "distributes IWL for advertising decisions",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "IAB recommends incorporating IWL data in advertising contracts/workflows and requesting PIPCU authorization. No executed advertiser agreement was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iab-contracts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
                "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IAB UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends IWL in contracts and processes",
            "sourceName": "IAB UK",
            "targetName": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Anonymous agencies describe PIPCU, private research, client and internal inputs. Thinkbox paragraphs14–15 separately caution some post-purchase blocking may leave payment intact; no named deployment or transaction was independently observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mixed-ad-inputs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thinkbox ADV0038 anonymous agency accounts",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports mixed public and private list use",
            "sourceName": "Thinkbox ADV0038 anonymous agency accounts",
            "targetName": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "date": "January2018"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          },
          {
            "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-site-operators",
      "label": "Affected website operators — list review role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Applicants for challenge/removal under each specified national process; no individual site is designated here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-site-operators",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-site-operators",
        "name": "Affected website operators — list review role",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Applicants for challenge/removal under each specified national process; no individual site is designated here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Applicants for challenge/removal under each specified national process; no individual site is designated here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Applicants for challenge/removal under each specified national process; no individual site is designated here.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "seek correction through applicable national process",
            "sourceName": "Affected website operators — list review role",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Guidance describes contact and a legitimate-operation route, followed by another review when positive contact fails. Payment-provider withdrawal is a separate request.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-notice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contacts operators before further disruption",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Affected website operators — list review role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Guidance affords website operators a challenge route; this is not the FOI access-review deadline.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may challenge police action",
            "sourceName": "Affected website operators — list review role",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-prs",
      "label": "PRS for Music",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Reported supplier of138 Creative website referrals; counting period not specified in the report paragraph.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-prs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-prs",
        "name": "PRS for Music",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Reported supplier of138 Creative website referrals; counting period not specified in the report paragraph.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reported supplier of138 Creative website referrals; counting period not specified in the report paragraph."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reported supplier of138 Creative website referrals; counting period not specified in the report paragraph.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PRS's contribution reports138 referrals, not138 accepted listings. Its2018/19 report paragraph does not specify the counting period.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-prs-referrals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports138 website referrals",
            "sourceName": "PRS for Music",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "Counting period unspecified in2018/19 report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction",
            "heading": "Attributed referrals and effects",
            "text": "The PRS for Music contribution , PDF 113 / printed 109, reports its Rights Protection Unit submitting 138 website referrals . This appears in the2018/19 report, but the Operation Creative paragraph does not specify the counting period; nearby2018 dates concern separate work. This establishes PRS's attributed exercised supply of referrals. It does not show that all 138 were accepted or identify the advertisements removed because of each referral. Its surrounding MAPS/search/app achievements are different channels and must not be counted as IWL results.",
            "matched": [
              "PRS for Music"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b286224872d266f7a0a888de42ad58c5cfc1fa1648232c15120c61d786f9efd3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-portal-spec",
      "label": "2024 Op Creative Portal specification",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Tender design places submission acceptance with police administrators; implementation and award unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-portal-spec",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-portal-spec",
        "name": "2024 Op Creative Portal specification",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Tender design places submission acceptance with police administrators; implementation and award unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Tender design places submission acceptance with police administrators; implementation and award unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tender design places submission acceptance with police administrators; implementation and award unverified.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The17April2024 tender specifies police accept/reject permissions, limited investigator access and nonediting download users; no deployed permissions or supplier award is proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-portal-design"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "assigns submission acceptance to police administrators",
            "sourceName": "2024 Op Creative Portal specification",
            "targetName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "date": "2024-04-17 – 2024-04-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "label": "White Bullet",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Vendor of official-list and proprietary risk resources; measurement and use claims retain vendor attribution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-whitebullet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "name": "White Bullet",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Vendor of official-list and proprietary risk resources; measurement and use claims retain vendor attribution.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor of official-list and proprietary risk resources; measurement and use claims retain vendor attribution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
            "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "White Bullet provides commercial piracy-risk and advertising-exclusion resources. Its descriptions distinguish an index based on official court or authority lists from proprietary assessment that can extend beyond adjudicated sites.",
        "structuralRole": "Vendor combining official determinations, private assessment and ad-market distribution",
        "significance": "White Bullet connects source lists and its own analysis to products available through advertising intermediaries. That combination can expand coverage, but it also means an exclusion resource is not uniformly a list of court judgments. Its measurement work supplies reported estimates of advertising effects rather than records of recovered or paid money.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Products and reported impact",
            "text": "The vendor describes specialist and machine-learning assessment alongside its official-list index. It reported WIPO ALERT membership in May 2021, and Peer39's marketplace lists its piracy-domain exclusion offering. Police later attributed to White Bullet a 58% decline in UK advertising and an estimated £6 million reduction in IWL-site advertising revenue from UK traffic during 2022. The original study and counterfactual were not acquired, so these remain attributed estimates rather than audited cash effects.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
              },
              {
                "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
              },
              {
                "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
                "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
              "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
              "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use",
              "w30-class-e-peer-offering",
              "w30-class-e-creative-estimate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Police attributes a58% decline in UK advertising and estimated GBP6m reduction in IWL-site advertising revenue from UK traffic, January–December2022, to White Bullet research. No original study, counterfactual or cash record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-estimate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
                "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Operation Creative",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplies police-published advertising estimate",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "Operation Creative",
            "date": "January–December2022"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current marketplace counterpart lists White Bullet as providing a piracy-domain exclusion resource. Exact launch, purchaser activation and cash effects are unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-peer-offering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
                "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Peer39",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "currently advertises piracy exclusion offering",
            "sourceName": "Peer39",
            "targetName": "White Bullet",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "White Bullet's5May2021 account names WIPO ALERT membership and combined official/private data offering; no executed licence or item-level ingestion audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports membership and use alongside own assessments",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": "2021-05-05 – 2021-05-05"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Vendor describes specialist/machine-learning assessment beyond adjudicated sites; this is a commercial methodology claim, not a court finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet proprietary IPI Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advertises independent risk assessments",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "White Bullet proprietary IPI Index",
            "date": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Vendor describes a global court/order-list index, distinct from its own broader risk scoring. No underlying entries were inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-official-index"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet Global Piracy Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advertises combined official-list resource",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "White Bullet Global Piracy Index",
            "date": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "26May2021 announcement says planned pre-bid offering will go live inQ3; it alone does not prove completion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Peer39",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announces prospective marketplace delivery",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "Peer39",
            "date": "2021-05-26 – 2021-05-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
            "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-gpi",
      "label": "White Bullet Global Piracy Index",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Vendor-described combination of court-order and official infringement-list sources.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-gpi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-gpi",
        "name": "White Bullet Global Piracy Index",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Vendor-described combination of court-order and official infringement-list sources.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor-described combination of court-order and official infringement-list sources."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Vendor-described combination of court-order and official infringement-list sources.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Vendor describes a global court/order-list index, distinct from its own broader risk scoring. No underlying entries were inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-official-index"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advertises combined official-list resource",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "White Bullet Global Piracy Index",
            "date": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-ipi",
      "label": "White Bullet proprietary IPI Index",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Vendor-described risk assessment extending beyond court/enforcement-adjudicated sites.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-ipi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-ipi",
        "name": "White Bullet proprietary IPI Index",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Vendor-described risk assessment extending beyond court/enforcement-adjudicated sites.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor-described risk assessment extending beyond court/enforcement-adjudicated sites."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Vendor-described risk assessment extending beyond court/enforcement-adjudicated sites.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Vendor describes specialist/machine-learning assessment beyond adjudicated sites; this is a commercial methodology claim, not a court finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "advertises independent risk assessments",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "White Bullet proprietary IPI Index",
            "date": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-peer39",
      "label": "Peer39",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Advertises White Bullet piracy-domain exclusion offering in its marketplace; activation and transactions unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-peer39",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-peer39",
        "name": "Peer39",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Advertises White Bullet piracy-domain exclusion offering in its marketplace; activation and transactions unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Advertises White Bullet piracy-domain exclusion offering in its marketplace; activation and transactions unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
            "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Peer39 is an advertising marketplace and targeting provider whose marketplace lists White Bullet's piracy-domain exclusion resource. An earlier partnership announcement proposed a pre-bid offering for advertisers.",
        "structuralRole": "Distribution channel for a commercial exclusion resource",
        "significance": "The marketplace connects a specialist piracy assessment to advertising-buying infrastructure. That can make a vendor's judgement available at the point where buyers decide which impressions to purchase. A listed offering demonstrates availability more directly than the earlier launch plan, while activation remains a separate event.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From planned launch to listed product",
            "text": "White Bullet's 26 May 2021 announcement said the Peer39 offering would go live in the third quarter. The currently captured Peer39 marketplace separately lists the White Bullet exclusion resource. The records do not establish the exact launch date, purchaser configurations, transaction volume or revenue effects for a particular publisher.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
              },
              {
                "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
                "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
              "w30-class-e-peer-offering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current marketplace counterpart lists White Bullet as providing a piracy-domain exclusion resource. Exact launch, purchaser activation and cash effects are unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-peer-offering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
                "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "currently advertises piracy exclusion offering",
            "sourceName": "Peer39",
            "targetName": "White Bullet",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "26May2021 announcement says planned pre-bid offering will go live inQ3; it alone does not prove completion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announces prospective marketplace delivery",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "Peer39",
            "date": "2021-05-26 – 2021-05-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
            "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
      "label": "Gambling Commission",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Issues the separately all-licence advertising condition and promotes IWL as an aid.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-gambling-commission",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
        "name": "Gambling Commission",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Issues the separately all-licence advertising condition and promotes IWL as an aid.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Issues the separately all-licence advertising condition and promotes IWL as an aid."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Gambling Commission is the UK regulator whose licence condition 16.1.1 addresses responsible placement of digital advertising. It separately promotes PIPCU's Infringing Website List as an aid to avoiding copyright-infringing destinations.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulatory advertising duty linked to an industry-facing list",
        "significance": "The Commission connects a binding licence requirement to a practical information resource. The two mechanisms should be read together without making the resource identical to the law: a list can support compliance, while the licence condition supplies the regulated operator's obligation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Condition and guidance",
            "text": "The inspected condition requires avoiding advertising on copyright-infringing destinations and taking reasonable steps concerning relevant third parties. A 2017 announcement encourages IWL use alongside that requirement. It does not declare every listed domain universally unlawful for every advertiser or establish that a particular gambling operator adopted the list.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
              },
              {
                "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
              "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2017 announcement encourages IWL use alongside the separate licence condition. It does not make every IWL listing a universal legal prohibition.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "encourages licensee access",
            "sourceName": "Gambling Commission",
            "targetName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "date": "2017-06-13 – 2017-06-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current inspected condition16.1.1 requires avoiding ads on copyright-infringing destinations and reasonable steps for relevant third parties.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes all-licence placement condition",
            "sourceName": "Gambling Commission",
            "targetName": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          },
          {
            "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-gambling-licensees",
      "label": "Gambling licence holders — condition scope",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Licensees under LCCP16.1.1; not a universal duty on all advertising users.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-gambling-licensees",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-gambling-licensees",
        "name": "Gambling licence holders — condition scope",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Licensees under LCCP16.1.1; not a universal duty on all advertising users.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Licensees under LCCP16.1.1; not a universal duty on all advertising users."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Licensees under LCCP16.1.1; not a universal duty on all advertising users.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Contracts must permit prompt termination where the licensee reasonably considers specified misplacement occurred, subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is capacity, not automatic exercise.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires termination-capable third-party contracts",
            "sourceName": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
            "targetName": "Gambling licence holders — condition scope",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
      "label": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Reasonable-step duties and termination-capable contracts, qualified by reasonableness and dispute provisions; no IWL mandate in the condition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-gambling-condition",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
        "name": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Reasonable-step duties and termination-capable contracts, qualified by reasonableness and dispute provisions; no IWL mandate in the condition.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reasonable-step duties and termination-capable contracts, qualified by reasonableness and dispute provisions; no IWL mandate in the condition."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reasonable-step duties and termination-capable contracts, qualified by reasonableness and dispute provisions; no IWL mandate in the condition.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Contracts must permit prompt termination where the licensee reasonably considers specified misplacement occurred, subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is capacity, not automatic exercise.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gambling licence holders — condition scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires termination-capable third-party contracts",
            "sourceName": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
            "targetName": "Gambling licence holders — condition scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current inspected condition16.1.1 requires avoiding ads on copyright-infringing destinations and reasonable steps for relevant third parties.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
                "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gambling Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes all-licence placement condition",
            "sourceName": "Gambling Commission",
            "targetName": "LCCP16.1.1 advertising condition",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-thinkbox-evidence",
      "label": "Thinkbox ADV0038 anonymous agency accounts",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "January2018 mediated practice descriptions; source notes caution post-purchase blocking can coexist with payment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-thinkbox-evidence",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-thinkbox-evidence",
        "name": "Thinkbox ADV0038 anonymous agency accounts",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "January2018 mediated practice descriptions; source notes caution post-purchase blocking can coexist with payment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "January2018 mediated practice descriptions; source notes caution post-purchase blocking can coexist with payment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-list-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "January2018 mediated practice descriptions; source notes caution post-purchase blocking can coexist with payment.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Anonymous agencies describe PIPCU, private research, client and internal inputs. Thinkbox paragraphs14–15 separately caution some post-purchase blocking may leave payment intact; no named deployment or transaction was independently observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mixed-ad-inputs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports mixed public and private list use",
            "sourceName": "Thinkbox ADV0038 anonymous agency accounts",
            "targetName": "IWL advertising recipients",
            "date": "January2018"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-payment-providers",
      "label": "Payment service providers / merchant banks",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Unspecified recipient role in Creative requests and ALERT-PAY design; not an identified pilot participant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-payment-providers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-payment-providers",
        "name": "Payment service providers / merchant banks",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Unspecified recipient role in Creative requests and ALERT-PAY design; not an identified pilot participant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unspecified recipient role in Creative requests and ALERT-PAY design; not an identified pilot participant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Unspecified recipient role in Creative requests and ALERT-PAY design; not an identified pilot participant.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Providers choose action, if any, under existing policies; WIPO does not order automatic merchant termination. Named development providers are not the anonymous pilot identities.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "transmits claims for provider-specific decisions",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "targetName": "Payment service providers / merchant banks",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The case study describes asking a provider or merchant bank to withdraw services; it supplies no provider command or proved compliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-creative-payment-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
                "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests withdrawal of payment services",
            "sourceName": "Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)",
            "targetName": "Payment service providers / merchant banks",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
            "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-wipo",
      "label": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Institutional distributor and programme administrator; no automatic authority over private provider termination.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-wipo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-wipo",
        "name": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Institutional distributor and programme administrator; no automatic authority over private provider termination.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Institutional distributor and programme administrator; no automatic authority over private provider termination."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The World Intellectual Property Organization administers the WIPO ALERT advertising-list service and the developing ALERT-PAY payment-notice initiative. In these routes it distributes or checks information while national contributors and private recipients retain important substantive decisions.",
        "structuralRole": "International administrator connecting assessments to commercial intermediaries",
        "significance": "WIPO provides infrastructure and a recognised institutional channel through which infringement information can reach advertisers or payment providers. Its administrative role can improve circulation without making WIPO the adjudicator of every entry or the authority ordering a merchant's termination. The advertising and payment programmes have different operating models.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Programme responsibilities and reported pilot",
            "text": "For ALERT, WIPO screens advertising-user eligibility and distributes national lists. Its ALERT-PAY presentation describes completeness checks, notices and review administration. The deck reports a November 2024–August 2025 manual pilot with six rights holders, two unnamed payment providers, seventeen actions and thirty-five sites; 71% were reported offline or with goods removed. That mixed outcome is not a permanent-shutdown count or independent causal estimate. Mastercard and PayPal named elsewhere in the presentation are not identified as those anonymous pilot providers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
              "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
              "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
              "w30-class-e-pay-named-mc",
              "w30-class-e-pay-named-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Presentation assigns hosting, completeness/attestation checks, notices and review administration to WIPO; contested-merits decision rules and recipient restoration duties remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-hosting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "administers formalities, notices and review requests",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ permits WIPO to assess genuine advertising-business eligibility before access. Approval for any named applicant is not shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "screens and approves advertising access",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "WIPO distributes national lists and disclaims making its own infringement determinations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-host"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides distribution infrastructure",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "WIPO reports CHF3.207m pre-IPSAS actual expenditure for ER2.3 in2024/25. It is not a Pay project cost or bank transfer; broader sector totals are non-additive context. Financial details: value: 3,207,000; currency: CHF; kind: reported ER2.3 pre-IPSAS expenditure; not Pay cost; period: 2024/25",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports broader pre-IPSAS expenditure",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Deck reports November2024–August2025 pilot, six rightsholders/two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% sites offline OR goods removed. No closure numerator, permanent effect, causal attribution, lost revenue or independent evaluation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ALERT-PAY manual pilot",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports manual pilot and composite removals",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "ALERT-PAY manual pilot",
            "date": "November2024–August2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "WIPO slide4 names this provider in the programme description. Slide7 does not identify either historical pilot PSP; no provider-executed agreement acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-named-mc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "names provider in programme description",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": "June2026 presentation; posted16June2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "label": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "National contributor assessments distributed for advertising-only use under described arrangements; distinct from ALERT-PAY.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "name": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "National contributor assessments distributed for advertising-only use under described arrangements; distinct from ALERT-PAY.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "National contributor assessments distributed for advertising-only use under described arrangements; distinct from ALERT-PAY."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WIPO ALERT distributes national lists of suspected copyright-infringing websites to authorised advertising businesses. Contributors provide the assessments, while WIPO hosts the distribution service and disclaims making its own infringement determinations.",
        "structuralRole": "International distribution layer for nationally assessed advertising lists",
        "significance": "The programme can make national assessments usable across advertising systems without creating a single global merits authority. Users select lists, contributors retain responsibility and review processes remain national. This structure makes both the origin of a listing and its downstream use important to understanding its effects.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access, updates and limits",
            "text": "The 2019 framework uses national processes and reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement or facilitation. The FAQ describes free manual or API access, advertising-only use and confidentiality, with users able to choose contributor or country lists. WIPO notifies other contributors when a shared entry is deleted from another list; it does not thereby compel every list to remove it or every advertiser to restore purchases. White Bullet reports combining ALERT information with its separate commercial resources.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              },
              {
                "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
              "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-classification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supply national assessments and maintain entries",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ summarizes an advertising-only user agreement and confidentiality obligations; free access is described, with no executed current schedule or subsidy amount.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits described use to preventing misplaced ads",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes cross-list deletion notification",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "WIPO2019 paragraph3 cites PIPCU's IWL as a precedent; this does not establish a UK contributor agreement or operational feed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is cited as national precedent",
            "sourceName": "PIPCU Infringing Website List",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": "2019-06-18 – 2019-06-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FAQ permits users to choose contributor/country lists and describes manual/API access. No runtime use tested.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "select which contributor lists to use",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "WIPO distributes national lists and disclaims making its own infringement determinations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-host"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides distribution infrastructure",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "White Bullet's5May2021 account names WIPO ALERT membership and combined official/private data offering; no executed licence or item-level ingestion audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
                "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "White Bullet",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports membership and use alongside own assessments",
            "sourceName": "White Bullet",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": "2021-05-05 – 2021-05-05"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. Root core lane closed for independent review. This is a separate payment-information programme, not WIPO Pay for office fees, WIPO ALERT advertising, or Brazil's domestic distribution to payment intermediaries. Source descriptions and reported outcomes are kept at their dates. No account, list, payment operation or video playback was performed. Original speech has not been watched or authenticated against the automatic transcript.",
            "matched": [
              "WIPO ALERT"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "15a0d98163357e46d9178bfd3601c37c6833ed505f69b6ee7d5221ff2c9ed97c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary",
            "heading": "Finite search and custody scope",
            "text": "Six discovery queries were run in two batches: site:wipo.int \"ALERT-PAY\" ; site:wipo.int \"ALERT PAY\" funding budget procurement ; site:ungm.org \"ALERT\" \"WIPO\" ; \"WIPO ALERT-PAY\" launch August September 2026 procurement ; \"WIPO ALERT PAY\" tender software contract budget ; site:wipo.int \"Program of Work and Budget 2026/27\" approved Assemblies July 2025 . Returned candidates were assessed; no exact public Pay contract, award notice or post-June launch instrument was located. This was not an exhaustive procurement-archive audit. WIPOPay service-fee material, advertising ALERT and Brazilian domestic lists were excluded as different instruments. A later keynote and webcast were discovery candidates only; the root already owns the decisive webcast scope, so they were not separately promoted here.",
            "matched": [
              "WIPO ALERT"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "79b03395cf79db016b7639abb56708d33a49a24b2e8050e7ced1551e513b98c9"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
            "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-contributors",
      "label": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Contributors retain lists, accuracy responsibility and national review; not every contributor is a ministry.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-contributors",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-contributors",
        "name": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Contributors retain lists, accuracy responsibility and national review; not every contributor is a ministry.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Contributors retain lists, accuracy responsibility and national review; not every contributor is a ministry."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WIPO ALERT national contributors supply lists developed under their own national processes. They retain responsibility for assessment, accuracy and updates, while WIPO provides a distribution layer for authorised advertising users.",
        "structuralRole": "National assessment authorities behind an international list-distribution service",
        "significance": "The contributors determine the substance that advertising users receive. WIPO's common interface can widen distribution, but it does not replace national review or make all contributors' rules identical. Correction therefore has both a source-list stage and a downstream notification stage.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Assessment and review",
            "text": "The 2019 framework describes reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement or facilitation under national processes, rather than requiring a final judgment for every entry. Contributors are responsible for prompt removal updates and retain national challenge routes. The FAQ describes notifying other contributors when a shared entry is deleted elsewhere. That notification does not force deletion from every national list or require advertisers to restore business; the published Brazil and Japan procedures illustrate differing processes.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-classification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supply national assessments and maintain entries",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected website operators — list review role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "seek correction through applicable national process",
            "sourceName": "Affected website operators — list review role",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes cross-list deletion notification",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ describes contributor permission/refusal with all lists the default; this is a data-access right, not control of every advertising choice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may refuse particular users list access",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-alert-users",
      "label": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Screened advertising businesses; described user agreements, list selection and contributor permissions apply.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-alert-users",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-alert-users",
        "name": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Screened advertising businesses; described user agreements, list selection and contributor permissions apply.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Screened advertising businesses; described user agreements, list selection and contributor permissions apply."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WIPO ALERT authorised users are screened advertising businesses given access to national contributor lists under the programme's described agreements. They can use lists in advertising decisions and select which contributor or country lists to receive.",
        "structuralRole": "Advertising recipients translating distributed lists into buying choices",
        "significance": "Access to a shared list reduces the work of assembling national infringement information, but the recipient still chooses how to apply it. Eligibility review, contributor permissions and contractual purpose limits determine who receives the information and what they may do with it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Access and use conditions",
            "text": "The FAQ says WIPO assesses whether an applicant is a genuine advertising business. Contributors may permit or refuse access; the described default covers all lists, with user selection available. Manual and API access are described as free and subject to advertising-only use and confidentiality obligations. The retained material does not show a named applicant's approval, executed agreement or running integration.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ summarizes an advertising-only user agreement and confidentiality obligations; free access is described, with no executed current schedule or subsidy amount.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "limits described use to preventing misplaced ads",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ describes contributor permission/refusal with all lists the default; this is a data-access right, not control of every advertising choice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may refuse particular users list access",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT national contributors",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FAQ permits WIPO to assess genuine advertising-business eligibility before access. Approval for any named applicant is not shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "screens and approves advertising access",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FAQ permits users to choose contributor/country lists and describes manual/API access. No runtime use tested.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "select which contributor lists to use",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT authorized advertising users",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-pay",
      "label": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Payment-notice initiative: manual pilot November2024–August2025, development at June2026 presentation; no public go-live or specific provider contract proved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-pay",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-pay",
        "name": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Payment-notice initiative: manual pilot November2024–August2025, development at June2026 presentation; no public go-live or specific provider contract proved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Payment-notice initiative: manual pilot November2024–August2025, development at June2026 presentation; no public go-live or specific provider contract proved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WIPO ALERT-PAY is a payment-notice initiative for suspected intellectual-property infringement, distinct from WIPO ALERT's advertising lists. A June 2026 presentation described development following a manual pilot conducted from November 2024 through August 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Notice-handling bridge between rights holders and payment providers",
        "significance": "ALERT-PAY aims to organise information and notice stages before a payment provider assesses action under its own policies. WIPO's administrative involvement can standardise that route without becoming an automatic merchant-termination authority. The operational boundary is the provider's own assessment and chosen response.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Proposed workflow and status",
            "text": "The presentation describes a rights-holder notice and three working days before a WIPO application, followed by completeness review, a second notice and another three working days before payment-provider assessment. The completeness stage has no stated deadline, so this is not a guaranteed six-day process. WIPO's approved 2026/27 programme names deployment as a priority. The retained research found no public go-live instrument, exact provider-executed agreement or project-specific budget allocation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
              "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
              "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Diagram describes a rightsholder notice and3workingdays before WIPO application, then WIPO completeness review/second notice and another3workingdays before PSP assessment. No completeness deadline or guaranteed six-day maximum is supplied; actual/simulated-purchase conditions are not treated as universal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ALERT-PAY authorized rightsholders — design role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submit claims after first notice interval",
            "sourceName": "ALERT-PAY authorized rightsholders — design role",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Presentation assigns hosting, completeness/attestation checks, notices and review administration to WIPO; contested-merits decision rules and recipient restoration duties remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-hosting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "administers formalities, notices and review requests",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Providers choose action, if any, under existing policies; WIPO does not order automatic merchant termination. Named development providers are not the anonymous pilot identities.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Payment service providers / merchant banks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "transmits claims for provider-specific decisions",
            "sourceName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "targetName": "Payment service providers / merchant banks",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Approved2026/27 programme names ALERT-PAY deployment. Broader result/sector sums are not allocated to this tool.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes planned deployment priority",
            "sourceName": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary",
            "heading": "Finite search and custody scope",
            "text": "Six discovery queries were run in two batches: site:wipo.int \"ALERT-PAY\" ; site:wipo.int \"ALERT PAY\" funding budget procurement ; site:ungm.org \"ALERT\" \"WIPO\" ; \"WIPO ALERT-PAY\" launch August September 2026 procurement ; \"WIPO ALERT PAY\" tender software contract budget ; site:wipo.int \"Program of Work and Budget 2026/27\" approved Assemblies July 2025 . Returned candidates were assessed; no exact public Pay contract, award notice or post-June launch instrument was located. This was not an exhaustive procurement-archive audit. WIPOPay service-fee material, advertising ALERT and Brazilian domestic lists were excluded as different instruments. A later keynote and webcast were discovery candidates only; the root already owns the decisive webcast scope, so they were not separately promoted here.",
            "matched": [
              "WIPO ALERT-PAY"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "79b03395cf79db016b7639abb56708d33a49a24b2e8050e7ced1551e513b98c9"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-pay-pilot",
      "label": "ALERT-PAY manual pilot",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "WIPO reports six rightsholders, two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% composite site-or-goods removal; no merchant closure count.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-pay-pilot",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-pay-pilot",
        "name": "ALERT-PAY manual pilot",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "WIPO reports six rightsholders, two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% composite site-or-goods removal; no merchant closure count.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "WIPO reports six rightsholders, two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% composite site-or-goods removal; no merchant closure count."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WIPO reports six rightsholders, two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% composite site-or-goods removal; no merchant closure count.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Deck reports November2024–August2025 pilot, six rightsholders/two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% sites offline OR goods removed. No closure numerator, permanent effect, causal attribution, lost revenue or independent evaluation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports manual pilot and composite removals",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "ALERT-PAY manual pilot",
            "date": "November2024–August2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
      "label": "ALERT-PAY authorized rightsholders — design role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Rights claimants in proposed notice workflow; illustrative Adidas screens do not identify an actual participant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
        "name": "ALERT-PAY authorized rightsholders — design role",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Rights claimants in proposed notice workflow; illustrative Adidas screens do not identify an actual participant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Rights claimants in proposed notice workflow; illustrative Adidas screens do not identify an actual participant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rights claimants in proposed notice workflow; illustrative Adidas screens do not identify an actual participant.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Diagram describes a rightsholder notice and3workingdays before WIPO application, then WIPO completeness review/second notice and another3workingdays before PSP assessment. No completeness deadline or guaranteed six-day maximum is supplied; actual/simulated-purchase conditions are not treated as universal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submit claims after first notice interval",
            "sourceName": "ALERT-PAY authorized rightsholders — design role",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-wipo-member-states",
      "label": "WIPO Member States — programme approval role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Approve WIPO work programme; no programme approval is treated as direct instruction to a merchant or PSP.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-wipo-member-states",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-wipo-member-states",
        "name": "WIPO Member States — programme approval role",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Approve WIPO work programme; no programme approval is treated as direct instruction to a merchant or PSP.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Approve WIPO work programme; no programme approval is treated as direct instruction to a merchant or PSP."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Approve WIPO work programme; no programme approval is treated as direct instruction to a merchant or PSP.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official budget page reports Member State approval inJuly2025, with Director General submission and annual reporting. No product acceptance or private-provider command inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "approved biennial programme",
            "sourceName": "WIPO Member States — programme approval role",
            "targetName": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "date": "July2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary",
            "heading": "Candidate relations, not canonical edits",
            "text": "WIPO Member States -> WIPO 2026/27 programme: approved July2025 (source-record statement on official budget page).",
            "matched": [
              "WIPO Member States"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "11ef411790ec8c791108910f511b0706d36be64dc83b55dd4499c31f66e91adc"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
      "label": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Includes planned ALERT-PAY deployment within broader priorities. No exact Pay budget allocation acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-wipo-programme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
        "name": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Includes planned ALERT-PAY deployment within broader priorities. No exact Pay budget allocation acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Includes planned ALERT-PAY deployment within broader priorities. No exact Pay budget allocation acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "WIPO's approved Programme of Work and Budget for 2026/27 includes ALERT-PAY deployment among its priorities. The official budget page records Member State approval in July 2025, following Director General submission.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional authorisation and broader budget context for planned deployment",
        "significance": "The programme places ALERT-PAY within WIPO's approved work rather than leaving it solely as an informal presentation idea. Its financial categories are broader than the product, however, so the budget cannot be used to infer the tool's cost or a private provider's contribution.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the allocation establishes",
            "text": "The programme allocates CHF 2.858 million to Expected Result 2.3. That is a broader result allocation, not an ALERT-PAY earmark. Annual reporting provides an accountability route for programme delivery, but approval is not evidence of software acceptance, launch, a supplier payment or authority to compel a payment provider's merchant decision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
              },
              {
                "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-approval",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
              "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Programme allocates CHF2.858m to ER2.3, not to ALERT-PAY alone; no private PSP finance or supplier payment is established. Financial details: value: 2,858,000; currency: CHF; kind: broader ER2.3 budget allocation; not Pay earmark; period: 2026/27",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "allocates broader result budget",
            "sourceName": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "targetName": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Approved2026/27 programme names ALERT-PAY deployment. Broader result/sector sums are not allocated to this tool.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "includes planned deployment priority",
            "sourceName": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "targetName": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official budget page reports Member State approval inJuly2025, with Director General submission and annual reporting. No product acceptance or private-provider command inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO Member States — programme approval role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "approved biennial programme",
            "sourceName": "WIPO Member States — programme approval role",
            "targetName": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "date": "July2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
      "label": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "BRIP international dialogue/cooperation budget/expenditure. Figures are not an ALERT-PAY earmark or payment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-wipo-er23",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
        "name": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "BRIP international dialogue/cooperation budget/expenditure. Figures are not an ALERT-PAY earmark or payment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "BRIP international dialogue/cooperation budget/expenditure. Figures are not an ALERT-PAY earmark or payment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-notice-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "BRIP international dialogue/cooperation budget/expenditure. Figures are not an ALERT-PAY earmark or payment.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Programme allocates CHF2.858m to ER2.3, not to ALERT-PAY alone; no private PSP finance or supplier payment is established. Financial details: value: 2,858,000; currency: CHF; kind: broader ER2.3 budget allocation; not Pay earmark; period: 2026/27",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "allocates broader result budget",
            "sourceName": "WIPO approved programme2026/27",
            "targetName": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "WIPO reports CHF3.207m pre-IPSAS actual expenditure for ER2.3 in2024/25. It is not a Pay project cost or bank transfer; broader sector totals are non-additive context. Financial details: value: 3,207,000; currency: CHF; kind: reported ER2.3 pre-IPSAS expenditure; not Pay cost; period: 2024/25",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
                "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports broader pre-IPSAS expenditure",
            "sourceName": "World Intellectual Property Organization",
            "targetName": "WIPO Expected Result2.3 — broad budget scope",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Shared terminated-merchant/owner information system; mandatory reporting/inquiry coexists with discretion over new admission.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-match",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-match",
        "name": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Shared terminated-merchant/owner information system; mandatory reporting/inquiry coexists with discretion over new admission.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Shared terminated-merchant/owner information system; mandatory reporting/inquiry coexists with discretion over new admission."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-record-authority",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Mastercard MATCH Pro is a shared information system about terminated merchants and their owners. Network rules require qualifying reports and pre-onboarding inquiries, while preserving an acquiring institution's discretion to accept a merchant despite an entry.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared risk record affecting future merchant admission",
        "significance": "MATCH can carry information from one acquiring relationship into another institution's onboarding process, including later alerts after an inquiry. That creates a path for effects beyond the original termination. Accuracy duties, correction routes and recipient discretion determine how the information should be interpreted and challenged.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reporting, retention and correction",
            "text": "The inspected Chapter 11 rule links reporting to termination and reason to believe a listed condition exists; its five-calendar-day clock runs from specified earlier decision, notice or awareness events. Potential identity matches require relevance checks. Acquirers retain accuracy responsibility and must respond to listing questions within seven days and removal requests within thirty calendar days. Neither response clock guarantees removal. Listings generally purge after five years, while some downstream records persist. Erroneous additions have a correction route; the merchant's direct PCI-compliance route is narrower than a universal appeal bypass.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-entry",
              "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
              "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
              "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
              "w30-class-e-match-purge",
              "w30-class-e-match-correction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section11.5 combines termination by merchant/acquirer with reason to believe a listed condition exists. Five calendar days runs from earlier listed decision/notice/awareness events, not effective termination; awareness is not detached from the opening condition.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-entry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must report under qualifying termination triggers",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Acquirers retain accuracy responsibility when delegating work; good faith, reason-code grounds and reasonable correction are required. Removal requests require a30calendar-day response, listing questions7; neither clock guarantees removal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-accuracy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retain accuracy and reasonable-correction responsibility",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section11.13 permits removal for erroneous addition reported by an authorized user or specified cured PCI code12 noncompliance. Merchant direct application when acquirer unwilling/unable is narrow PCI route, not general bypass.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-correction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "permits early removal on specified grounds",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Section11.10 provides5year listing retention/purge; recipient records persist at least2years after agreement end and inquiry records365days. Central purge does not erase all downstream records or restore processing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-purge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides five-year listing purge",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Stripe's published practice gives MATCH a restrictive onward use. No identified Stripe decision or acquiring-bank identity is established; its1workingday summary differs from the August network5calendar-day rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is an input to restrictive underwriting",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "targetName": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The appellate record describes Merrick's termination and MATCH listing of eGumball; its record showed Merrick alone could request this listing's addition/removal. Accuracy and final remedy remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-merrick-match"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported eGumball after termination",
            "sourceName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": "2021 dispute"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Section11.6.4 describes alerts for later added information within365days after an inquiry, visible30days and once in batch results. Recipient next steps remain separate; no closure cascade observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-retroactive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides retroactive alerts after inquiries",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "targetName": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section11.6 requires inquiry before signing/enabling acceptance. Exact/phonetic or spelling hits are possible identity matches requiring relevance checks, not proof of misconduct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-inquiry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must inquire before agreement or acceptance",
            "sourceName": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
            "title": "Stripe implementation — MATCH screening and processing access"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
            "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-merchants",
      "label": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Role class affected by qualifying reports and information rights, not a finding about every merchant or all bank access.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-merchants",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-merchants",
        "name": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Role class affected by qualifying reports and information rights, not a finding about every merchant or all bank access.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Role class affected by qualifying reports and information rights, not a finding about every merchant or all bank access."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-record-authority",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This collective represents merchants and owners affected by Mastercard's anti-piracy and MATCH rules. It identifies the parties whose product acceptance, risk records and future acquiring relationships may change, rather than a finding against every merchant.",
        "structuralRole": "Businesses and owners subject to shared risk information and access decisions",
        "significance": "A merchant can encounter several distinct decisions: whether an infringing product may use Mastercard, whether the whole merchant relationship ends, whether a report belongs in MATCH and whether another institution will accept the business. Those distinctions determine both the commercial effect and the appropriate correction route.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Admission and information rights",
            "text": "The anti-piracy policy can require cessation of Mastercard acceptance for an infringing product without automatically terminating the entire merchant. MATCH rules expressly permit onboarding despite a listing after required inquiry. The March 2026 privacy notice describes law-dependent access, correction, restriction, deletion and complaint routes, sometimes through the relevant institution. Its one-month written-response provision is not a universal correction deadline or an entitlement to restored processing.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
              "w30-class-e-match-admission",
              "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
              "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "March2026 notice describes law-dependent access/correction/restriction/deletion/complaint routes, with California requests to relevant institutions and other requests possibly redirected. One-month written reply is not correction deadline; no universal processing entitlement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may seek applicable personal-information remedies",
            "sourceName": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "An affirmative policy finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; negative findings require compelling evidence. Product cessation is not automatically full merchant termination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must end acceptance for affirmatively infringing products",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Sections11.2/11.6.4 expressly allow onboarding notwithstanding a MATCH entry; mandatory inquiry does not require refusal. Each institution makes its own decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-admission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may admit a listed merchant",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "Merchants and owners — MATCH rule scope",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
            "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties"
          },
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-match-users",
      "label": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Approved acquirers and registered/provisioned providers; service access requires acquirer approval. No actual authorization inspected.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-match-users",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-match-users",
        "name": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Approved acquirers and registered/provisioned providers; service access requires acquirer approval. No actual authorization inspected.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Approved acquirers and registered/provisioned providers; service access requires acquirer approval. No actual authorization inspected."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-record-authority",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Approved acquirers and registered/provisioned providers; service access requires acquirer approval. No actual authorization inspected.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Section11.6.4 describes alerts for later added information within365days after an inquiry, visible30days and once in batch results. Recipient next steps remain separate; no closure cascade observed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-retroactive"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides retroactive alerts after inquiries",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "targetName": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section11.6 requires inquiry before signing/enabling acceptance. Exact/phonetic or spelling hits are possible identity matches requiring relevance checks, not proof of misconduct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-inquiry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must inquire before agreement or acceptance",
            "sourceName": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Chapter11 requires relevant service-provider registration/provisioning and acquirer approval. No authorization was exercised by this inquiry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-match-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approve service-provider access within registration rules",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard acquirers · rule scope",
            "targetName": "MATCH authorized acquirers and service providers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
            "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-match-rules",
      "label": "MATCH Chapter11 — public August2026 edition",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Dated public manual reader, with currency caveat; not all underlying network contracts or historic rules.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-match-rules",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-match-rules",
        "name": "MATCH Chapter11 — public August2026 edition",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Dated public manual reader, with currency caveat; not all underlying network contracts or historic rules.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated public manual reader, with currency caveat; not all underlying network contracts or historic rules."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-record-authority",
        "notes": [],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 0
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the public August 2026 edition of Mastercard’s merchant-screening rules examined in the investigation. It is a document and version, not another organisation.",
        "structuralRole": "The dated rulebook used to check payment claims",
        "significance": "Keeping the rulebook separate lets a reader compare the network’s written requirements with a processor’s own acceptance policy and distinguish current rules from earlier accounts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
      "label": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "General disqualification with exceptional-circumstance consideration, a provider choice rather than mandatory network-wide refusal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
        "name": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "General disqualification with exceptional-circumstance consideration, a provider choice rather than mandatory network-wide refusal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "General disqualification with exceptional-circumstance consideration, a provider choice rather than mandatory network-wide refusal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-record-authority",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "General disqualification with exceptional-circumstance consideration, a provider choice rather than mandatory network-wide refusal.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Stripe's published practice gives MATCH a restrictive onward use. No identified Stripe decision or acquiring-bank identity is established; its1workingday summary differs from the August network5calendar-day rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is an input to restrictive underwriting",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "targetName": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stripe generally disqualifies MATCH-listed merchants but will consider documented exceptional circumstances such as identity theft. Consideration does not promise approval.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-stripe-policy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stripe",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes general disqualification with exceptions",
            "sourceName": "Stripe",
            "targetName": "Stripe published MATCH acceptance practice",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
            "title": "Stripe implementation — MATCH screening and processing access"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
            "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-ip-claimants",
      "label": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "General provider-policy eligible claimant class; not proof of an accepted Creative or ALERT-PAY referral.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-ip-claimants",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-ip-claimants",
        "name": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "General provider-policy eligible claimant class; not proof of an accepted Creative or ALERT-PAY referral.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "General provider-policy eligible claimant class; not proof of an accepted Creative or ALERT-PAY referral."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "payment-record-authority",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "General provider-policy eligible claimant class; not proof of an accepted Creative or ALERT-PAY referral.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "UK15July2026 and US6May2021 paragraphs invite rights-owner reports and permit appropriate action where needed. They disclose no ALERT-PAY-specific deadline, automatic termination or appeal clock; locale entities do not identify the pilot contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-paypal-referral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "invites infringement reports and may take appropriate action",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "General Anti-Piracy Policy permits rights-owner/authorized-association referrals with evidence and attestations. This does not prove a WIPO ALERT-PAY intake route or accepted Creative request.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mc-referral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may submit qualifying IP referrals under general policy",
            "sourceName": "IP owners and authorized associations — provider-policy role",
            "targetName": "Mastercard",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-egumball",
      "label": "eGumball, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Merchant in2023/2025 appeals; allegations and procedural rulings do not establish completed delisting or restored processing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-egumball",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-egumball",
        "name": "eGumball, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Merchant in2023/2025 appeals; allegations and procedural rulings do not establish completed delisting or restored processing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Merchant in2023/2025 appeals; allegations and procedural rulings do not establish completed delisting or restored processing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "eGumball, Inc. is the merchant challenging payment-processing termination and a shared merchant-risk listing in the cited California proceedings. The acquired 2023 and 2025 appeals concern interim remedies and anti-SLAPP procedure, rather than final liability.",
        "structuralRole": "Merchant seeking correction and renewed access after a risk report",
        "significance": "The case exposes how a shared commercial record can become a practical obstacle that a merchant tries to address through several legal stages. Removal, damages and new processing admission are distinct outcomes, so a procedural ruling alone does not show that the business regained payment access.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the court record supports",
            "text": "The opinions describe eGumball seeking removal and making wrongdoing and harm allegations. The later appeal also ordered a revised public brief concerning twenty-eight specified documents while partly allowing sealing without prejudice. The retained investigation did not acquire the revised filing or the underlying sealed contents. The public procedural decisions do not establish a completed correction or a successful application to another acquirer.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              },
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Disposition ordered an updated public brief within10days concerning28specified documents while partly permitting sealing without prejudice. No actual revised filing, exhibit contents or resulting remedy acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ordered revised public redacted brief",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Court record describes a merchant challenge seeking removal; damages and wrongdoing allegations are not adopted as findings.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sought provisional delisting relief",
            "sourceName": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
            "date": "2021"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-merrick",
      "label": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Acquirer described in historical eGumball record; actual listing/removal role distinct from Visa and Mastercard.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-merrick",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-merrick",
        "name": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Acquirer described in historical eGumball record; actual listing/removal role distinct from Visa and Mastercard.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Acquirer described in historical eGumball record; actual listing/removal role distinct from Visa and Mastercard."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Merrick Bank Corporation is the acquiring bank described in the eGumball appellate record as terminating processing and placing the merchant in MATCH. It later appealed the denial of its anti-SLAPP motion in the merchant's challenge.",
        "structuralRole": "Acquirer holding the reporting and removal-request role in a specific dispute",
        "significance": "The case makes the acquirer's role concrete: a network investigation was followed by bank termination and reporting, and the appellate record identified Merrick as able to request this listing's addition or removal. That places an identifiable institution between a shared database and a merchant seeking correction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The litigation sequence",
            "text": "The 2023 opinion describes a Visa investigation followed by Merrick's actions. A November 2021 temporary restraining order directed Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal, but the mandatory part was stayed and later reversed. The 2025 appeal concerns the anti-SLAPP defence, not final accuracy or contractual liability. The two opinions use different Paysafe legal names, which are not silently merged here. No completed delisting or restored acquiring relationship was established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              },
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-visa-investigation",
              "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
              "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The appellate record describes Merrick's termination and MATCH listing of eGumball; its record showed Merrick alone could request this listing's addition/removal. Accuracy and final remedy remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-merrick-match"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reported eGumball after termination",
            "sourceName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "targetName": "Mastercard MATCH Pro",
            "date": "2021 dispute"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "3November2021 TRO required Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal; its mandatory portion was stayed on appeal and later reversed. No performed delisting or processing restoration is proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ordered removal requests in provisional TRO",
            "sourceName": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
            "targetName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "date": "2021-11-03 – 2021-11-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "2023 opinion describes Visa investigation followed by Merrick's termination/reporting. This is an exercised historical route, not an ALERT-PAY link or current universal Visa rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-visa-investigation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Visa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "initiated historical investigation route",
            "sourceName": "Visa",
            "targetName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "date": "Historical2021 dispute; exact event dates not assigned here"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Merrick appealed denial of its special motion to strike; the2025 decision addresses procedural protected activity, not final truth or contract defenses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sought anti-SLAPP protection for MATCH report",
            "sourceName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025 appeal"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting",
            "heading": "What was actually decided",
            "text": "Merrick Bank Corporation was the appellant. The court affirmed the denial of Merrick's special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute. The underlying action also named Paysafe Services (US), Corp. and Visa; those parties' ultimate liability was not adjudicated here. The earlier 2023 opinion used Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions, LLC: this packet does not silently merge those legal names.",
            "matched": [
              "Merrick Bank Corporation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2d41a8150d9e84700444de04576db357a4e87e84db239812a3a63c2b4aeccec4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
      "label": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Trial forum30-2021-01216871; provisional2021 order described by appellate opinions, not final merits.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-egumball-superior",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
        "name": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Trial forum30-2021-01216871; provisional2021 order described by appellate opinions, not final merits.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Trial forum30-2021-01216871; provisional2021 order described by appellate opinions, not final merits."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Orange County Superior Court is the trial forum for eGumball's challenge concerning payment-processing termination and a merchant-risk listing, case 30-2021-01216871. Its provisional 2021 order is described in later appellate opinions.",
        "structuralRole": "Trial forum for an attempted merchant-listing remedy",
        "significance": "The trial proceedings show the merchant seeking an operational remedy through litigation: asking that the relevant parties request removal from a shared file. Appellate intervention then limited the provisional order, illustrating the distance between obtaining interim wording and actually recovering processing access.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The provisional order",
            "text": "A 3 November 2021 temporary restraining order required Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal. Its mandatory portion was stayed on appeal and later reversed. The record therefore establishes an attempted judicial route to correction, without proving performed delisting, restored payment processing or final findings on the merchant's allegations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "3November2021 TRO required Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal; its mandatory portion was stayed on appeal and later reversed. No performed delisting or processing restoration is proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ordered removal requests in provisional TRO",
            "sourceName": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
            "targetName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "date": "2021-11-03 – 2021-11-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Court record describes a merchant challenge seeking removal; damages and wrongdoing allegations are not adopted as findings.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sought provisional delisting relief",
            "sourceName": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Orange County Superior Court — eGumball case",
            "date": "2021"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
      "label": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Issued the distinct2023 emergency-relief and2025 anti-SLAPP decisions.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-appeal-fourth",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
        "name": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Issued the distinct2023 emergency-relief and2025 anti-SLAPP decisions.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Issued the distinct2023 emergency-relief and2025 anti-SLAPP decisions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "California's Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three issued the eGumball decisions concerning a payment-risk listing and attempts to challenge it. The 2023 emergency-relief appeal and the modified 2025 anti-SLAPP opinion address different procedural questions.",
        "structuralRole": "Appellate review of remedies and procedural protection for commercial reports",
        "significance": "The court connects a merchant's practical need for payment access to the legal tests governing interim relief and protected speech. Success at one stage does not establish inaccurate reporting or require restored processing. That distinction explains why a dispute can continue despite a favourable procedural ruling.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two separate decisions",
            "text": "On 17 May 2023, the court reversed interim mandatory relief for insufficient proof of the required harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing, reserving the merits. In 2025 it upheld denial of Merrick's anti-SLAPP motion because this confidential commercial report did not contribute to public discussion under the relevant provision. A 6 May modification corrected the account of eGumball's contractual assertion without changing the judgment. The opinions establish neither final liability nor completed delisting.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              },
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-version"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
              "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Court found this confidential commercial report did not contribute to public discussion under425.16(e)(4), while rejecting a categorical exclusion of all confidential commercial speech. Conversion was outside the motion; liability and privilege/contract defenses remain unadjudicated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "affirmed denial at protected-activity step",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "6May order substitutes eGumball's assertion that processed2020/2021 transactions were directly connected to written contracts; the contrary unmodified sentence is superseded. Rehearing denied, no judgment change; the assertion is not an adjudicated fact.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-version"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "modified inverted sentence without changing judgment",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025-05-06 – 2025-05-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "17May2023 appeal reversed for insufficient showing of required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing, expressly reserving merits. Delisting alone would still need another acquirer's admission decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball G060853 emergency-relief appeal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reversed emergency mandatory relief",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball G060853 emergency-relief appeal",
            "date": "2023-05-17 – 2023-05-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Disposition ordered an updated public brief within10days concerning28specified documents while partly permitting sealing without prejudice. No actual revised filing, exhibit contents or resulting remedy acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ordered revised public redacted brief",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting"
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-egumball2023",
      "label": "eGumball G060853 emergency-relief appeal",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Unpublished17May2023 opinion reversed mandatory TRO relief and reserved merits.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-egumball2023",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-egumball2023",
        "name": "eGumball G060853 emergency-relief appeal",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Unpublished17May2023 opinion reversed mandatory TRO relief and reserved merits.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Unpublished17May2023 opinion reversed mandatory TRO relief and reserved merits."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Unpublished17May2023 opinion reversed mandatory TRO relief and reserved merits.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "17May2023 appeal reversed for insufficient showing of required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing, expressly reserving merits. Delisting alone would still need another acquirer's admission decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reversed emergency mandatory relief",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball G060853 emergency-relief appeal",
            "date": "2023-05-17 – 2023-05-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
            "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-egumball2025",
      "label": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "23April2025 decision as modified6May affirmed denial of Merrick's procedural motion and ordered a narrower public brief. No final liability/removal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-egumball2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-egumball2025",
        "name": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "23April2025 decision as modified6May affirmed denial of Merrick's procedural motion and ordered a narrower public brief. No final liability/removal.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "23April2025 decision as modified6May affirmed denial of Merrick's procedural motion and ordered a narrower public brief. No final liability/removal."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the eGumball anti-SLAPP appeal decided on 23 April 2025 and modified on 6 May. It affirmed denial of Merrick's special motion to strike in litigation concerning confidential payment-risk reporting.",
        "structuralRole": "Procedural ruling applying FilmOn to a payment-reporting dispute",
        "significance": "The opinion connects advertising classification and payment-risk reporting through legal precedent, rather than shared data or ownership. It applies an audience, purpose and context analysis to determine whether the particular report contributed to public discussion. That addresses access to a procedural defence, not the report's ultimate truth.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Holding and corrected version",
            "text": "The court found this confidential commercial report outside the relevant public-interest provision while rejecting a categorical exclusion of all confidential commercial speech. Conversion was outside the motion, and liability, privilege and contract defences remained unresolved. The 6 May modification substitutes eGumball's assertion that processed 2020/2021 transactions were directly connected to written contracts. That assertion is not a judicially established fact; rehearing was denied without changing the judgment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
              "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
              "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Court found this confidential commercial report did not contribute to public discussion under425.16(e)(4), while rejecting a categorical exclusion of all confidential commercial speech. Conversion was outside the motion; liability and privilege/contract defenses remain unadjudicated.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "affirmed denial at protected-activity step",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "6May order substitutes eGumball's assertion that processed2020/2021 transactions were directly connected to written contracts; the contrary unmodified sentence is superseded. Rehearing denied, no judgment change; the assertion is not an adjudicated fact.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-egumball-version"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "modified inverted sentence without changing judgment",
            "sourceName": "California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025-05-06 – 2025-05-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied expressly applied legal framework",
            "sourceName": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Merrick appealed denial of its special motion to strike; the2025 decision addresses procedural protected activity, not final truth or contract defenses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sought anti-SLAPP protection for MATCH report",
            "sourceName": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025 appeal"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting"
          },
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-ca-supreme",
      "label": "Supreme Court of California",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "FilmOn2019 procedural decision; no classification correction or damages order.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-ca-supreme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-ca-supreme",
        "name": "Supreme Court of California",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "FilmOn2019 procedural decision; no classification correction or damages order.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FilmOn2019 procedural decision; no classification correction or damages order."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Supreme Court of California issued the 6 May 2019 FilmOn.com v. DoubleVerify opinion concerning whether confidential commercial website reports qualified for an anti-SLAPP procedural shield under the public-interest provision.",
        "structuralRole": "Court defining the public-interest test for commercial classification disputes",
        "significance": "The opinion supplies a legal bridge later used in the eGumball payment-reporting dispute. It asks how speech's audience, purpose and context relate to public discussion, rather than assuming that a socially important topic automatically protects every private commercial report.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the decision did",
            "text": "The court reversed the prior appellate judgment while rejecting FilmOn's proposed categorical distinction between commercial and noncommercial speech. Media-industry amici had requested protection for DoubleVerify and described an anti-piracy advertising mechanism. The ruling ordered no reclassification, damages, advertising purchase or restoration of revenue. Its procedural analysis leaves the truth and consequences of the challenged labels to other stages of the case.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-amici-request",
              "w30-class-e-filmon-reversal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "6May2019 Court reversed the prior appellate judgment under public-interest catchall, while rejecting FilmOn's categorical commercial/noncommercial approach. It ordered no reclassification, damages, ad purchase or restoration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-reversal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reversed protection for these confidential reports",
            "sourceName": "Supreme Court of California",
            "targetName": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
            "date": "2019-05-06 – 2019-05-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Amici described an anti-piracy advertising mechanism and requested anti-SLAPP protection. Court did not grant that disposition; overlap with concern about categorical commercial-speech exclusion is not causal adoption proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-amici-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested affirmance of DV procedural protection",
            "sourceName": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "targetName": "Supreme Court of California",
            "date": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-filmon",
      "label": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Historical claimant disputing breadth/meaning and commercial effects of DV labels.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-filmon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-filmon",
        "name": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Historical claimant disputing breadth/meaning and commercial effects of DV labels.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical claimant disputing breadth/meaning and commercial effects of DV labels."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FilmOn.com Inc. is the historical claimant that challenged DoubleVerify's descriptions of its network in confidential commercial reports to advertisers. It disputed the breadth and implications of the labels and alleged that they affected advertising relationships.",
        "structuralRole": "Publisher challenging the commercial consequences of classification",
        "significance": "FilmOn provides an example of classification becoming a contested business-access issue. Its claim focuses on how buyers understood a vendor's labels and acted on them. That mechanism can be consequential even though the cited procedural opinions do not establish falsity or quantify lost business.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The attributed correction request",
            "text": "FilmOn's opening brief says it demanded removal or correction on 12 December 2013, disputing whole-network treatment and a pornographic implication. It alleged that existing and prospective advertisers refused business because of the reports. The underlying correspondence and any later correction were not acquired. The California Supreme Court's 2019 opinion addresses an anti-SLAPP issue rather than awarding damages or ordering a label change.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-demand",
              "w30-class-e-filmon-harm-allegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Opening brief says FilmOn demanded removal/correction on12December2013 and disputed whole-network scope and pornographic implication; underlying letters/appendix and actual later correction not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-demand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "asserted a correction and clarification demand",
            "sourceName": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "date": "2013-12-12 – 2013-12-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FilmOn alleged reports caused prospective/existing advertisers to refuse business; no adjudicated falsity, damages amount or independent causal estimate is supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-harm-allegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "alleged false labels and advertising harm",
            "sourceName": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
            "targetName": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
            "date": "Historical complaint described2019"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting",
            "heading": "Two concrete accountability mechanisms",
            "text": "The court expressly applied FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. (2019), involving confidential paid website reports tagged for adult content or copyright infringement. In this opinion, that earlier case supplies the legal comparison between commercial classification for advertisers and commercial risk reporting for acquirers (printed pp13-14; reader305-319). The comparison is significant for the investigation's structure: a privately distributed classifier does not obtain this procedural shield merely by invoking a public-interest subject. It establishes no common ownership, data feed or operational coordination between DoubleVerify and MATCH, and does not adjudicate the truth of FilmOn's challenged classifications. The named precedent remains an unacquired next-question candidate; no separate FilmOn inquiry was opened.",
            "matched": [
              "FilmOn.com Inc."
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aeb600c4cf78e8fe3fcbfe3a119a2a88d73ee883442fc842d43a36678eb9c3e7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv-inc",
      "label": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named in FilmOn litigation and2025 complaint; distinct from Holdings and the general product brand where contracting entity is not established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv-inc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv-inc",
        "name": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named in FilmOn litigation and2025 complaint; distinct from Holdings and the general product brand where contracting entity is not established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named in FilmOn litigation and2025 complaint; distinct from Holdings and the general product brand where contracting entity is not established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DoubleVerify Inc. is the named company in the FilmOn classification litigation and a separate named plaintiff alongside DoubleVerify Holdings in the May 2025 Adalytics complaint. It should be distinguished from the general product brand and reporting parent.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal entity in disputes over commercial classification and criticism",
        "significance": "The historical case connects DoubleVerify's paid reports to a publisher's challenge about their breadth and commercial effects. The later complaint shows another legal posture, with DoubleVerify asserting claims against a researcher. Keeping the entities and cases precise prevents product descriptions from being mistaken for a contracting-party history.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Historical reports and later claim",
            "text": "The FilmOn opinion describes confidential paid reports using Adult Content and copyright-related categories. Adult Content included mature themes or language, not only pornography. FilmOn's opening brief says it demanded correction on 12 December 2013 and disputed whole-network scope and pornographic implications. Those are attributed demands and allegations. The May 2025 complaint names DoubleVerify Inc. and Holdings as plaintiffs against Adalytics; it does not resolve the earlier classifications.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-historical-dv-authorship",
              "w30-class-e-filmon-demand",
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FilmOn opinion describes DV-defined Adult Content and copyright streaming/file-sharing categories in paid confidential reports. Adult Content encompassed mature themes/language, not only pornography; categorization is not a final infringement judgment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-historical-dv-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defined and sold confidential classifications",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "targetName": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
            "date": "Historical record described6May2019"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "targetName": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Opening brief says FilmOn demanded removal/correction on12December2013 and disputed whole-network scope and pornographic implication; underlying letters/appendix and actual later correction not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-demand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "asserted a correction and clarification demand",
            "sourceName": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "date": "2013-12-12 – 2013-12-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting",
            "heading": "Two concrete accountability mechanisms",
            "text": "The court expressly applied FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. (2019), involving confidential paid website reports tagged for adult content or copyright infringement. In this opinion, that earlier case supplies the legal comparison between commercial classification for advertisers and commercial risk reporting for acquirers (printed pp13-14; reader305-319). The comparison is significant for the investigation's structure: a privately distributed classifier does not obtain this procedural shield merely by invoking a public-interest subject. It establishes no common ownership, data feed or operational coordination between DoubleVerify and MATCH, and does not adjudicate the truth of FilmOn's challenged classifications. The named precedent remains an unacquired next-question candidate; no separate FilmOn inquiry was opened.",
            "matched": [
              "DoubleVerify Inc."
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aeb600c4cf78e8fe3fcbfe3a119a2a88d73ee883442fc842d43a36678eb9c3e7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          },
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "label": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "FY2025 consolidated issuer and2025 legal claimant; current service disclosures do not establish exact old contracting entity.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "name": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "FY2025 consolidated issuer and2025 legal claimant; current service disclosures do not establish exact old contracting entity.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FY2025 consolidated issuer and2025 legal claimant; current service disclosures do not establish exact old contracting entity."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. is the publicly reporting corporate issuer for the DoubleVerify business and a plaintiff in the 2025 Adalytics complaint. Its consolidated filings describe the commercial model behind advertising verification and suitability services.",
        "structuralRole": "Reporting parent connecting verification revenue and legal defence",
        "significance": "The business depends mainly on advertisers purchasing measurement, with a smaller supply-side revenue stream. That identifies the customer relationships supporting the service, without establishing a fee for any particular exclusion. The same issuer also uses legal representation to challenge criticism of its products.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Revenue and legal activity",
            "text": "The FY2025 Form 10-K attributes 90% of revenue to advertisers, principally transaction or impression measurement fees, and 10% to supply-side customers, including minimum guarantees and tiered pricing. In April 2025, a Paul Hastings preservation letter represented Holdings to Check My Ads; in May, Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc. sued Adalytics. The filing's consolidated business description does not identify the exact contracting entity for every historical FilmOn service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-advertiser-revenue",
              "w30-class-e-dv-supply-revenue",
              "w30-class-e-dv-business-reporting",
              "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-firm-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Paul Hastings LLP",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named counsel in demand and pleading",
            "sourceName": "Paul Hastings LLP",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "April–May2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-preservation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued counsel demand under anticipated litigation",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "targetName": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "targetName": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Recipient-published letter names Bondi acting for DoubleVerify Holdings on Paul Hastings letterhead. No fee or ownership relation follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-bondi-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bradley J. Bondi",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed preservation letter as counsel",
            "sourceName": "Bradley J. Bondi",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The issuer describes configuration/classification and customer feedback in product development. Consolidated disclosure is not proof of the exact historical FilmOn contracting party.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-business-reporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports consolidated configuration and service model",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": "FY2025 report"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FY2025 filing reports90% of revenue from advertisers, mainly measured transaction/impression fees, with some capped spend-based fees. No absolute sum or fee per exclusion inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-advertiser-revenue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "accounted for reported90percent of group revenue",
            "sourceName": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "Fiscal2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FY2025 filing reports10% supply-side revenue with minimum guarantees/tiered pricing. This does not establish biased classification or a payment tied to a specific exclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-supply-revenue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV supply-side customers — disclosed class",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "accounted for reported10percent of group revenue",
            "sourceName": "DV supply-side customers — disclosed class",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "Fiscal2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          },
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv",
      "label": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Public product, data-input and membership accounts; exact legal contract party must be separately established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv",
        "name": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Public product, data-input and membership accounts; exact legal contract party must be separately established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public product, data-input and membership accounts; exact legal contract party must be separately established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 14
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DoubleVerify is an advertising-verification and classification business. Its published products combine automated and human review, customer-selectable categories and services used before and after advertising purchases.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial classifications influencing advertising access",
        "significance": "DoubleVerify supplies classifications that advertisers and platforms can use in buying or excluding inventory. Default settings and customer choices are important: a vendor’s category can influence access to revenue without every customer making the same decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter asks about blocking/remediation, advertiser notification, annual NCMEC-report use, authority reports and related revenue; answers requested by14February. Questions are not proof of underlying violations or completed compliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests remediation, data-use and revenue answers",
            "sourceName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "IWF places DV in Members contributing over£25,000. No exact amount, upper bound, payment date, invoice period or reconciled receipt is established; do not manufacture an annual2025payment by combining the current fee page. Payment status: band reported by recipient; receipt unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed in contribution band overGBP25000",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "DV says it reviewed three years/over300domains or providers, cross-checked existing classifications, assessed remaining sites and excluded large well-moderated social/search services. Exact years/files/columns/provider-domain mapping unknown; no misuse finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports source selection and further assessment",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "February7 company response disputes technical conclusions, reports extra blocking/review and a P2P category under development. It is interested-party response, not independently audited test data; temporal overlap with letters does not isolate causation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "disputes interpretation and reports added safeguards",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "25February2025 statement permits eligible DV advertiser measurement clients to request URL-level detail; interface and other integrations remained future plans in that announcement. It does not grant all publishers every advertiser report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-url-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced requestable URL-level reporting",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "date": "2025-02-25 – 2025-02-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "7April company statement challenges bot/billing/code and detection claims, including alleged misleading government representations. Merits and actual billable adjustments were not independently audited; this predates the14April letter.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes technical and commercial rebuttal",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "April24 release says nearly30 platforms implemented Highly Illicit and offers the category free to all platforms, including nonclients. No named platform logs, blocked-site count or raw-IWF-data redistribution licence proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-adoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported nearly30 category implementations",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
            "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "June2024 statement describes classification-review/report-log access and separation from sales/client teams. No independent adjudicator, decision deadline, worked correction or mandatory advertiser reconsideration acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-review-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes publisher review and sales separation",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": "2024-06-13 – 2024-06-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
            "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "9 September 2026. The public record now identifies DoubleVerify's membership start and contribution band, and describes what membership supplies. It also shows a route for funding members to participate in governance. None of the inspected records gives DV a reserved board seat, authority to dictate an individual content assessment, or a payment tied to a particular removal. Acquisition is closed after four directly relevant current pages and reuse of retained records.",
            "matched": [
              "DoubleVerify"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b240d683840c6dc55f5354c38093e4b34bd0dfd7739aeefa0b1da94a614653ac"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint",
            "heading": "Finite search and custody boundary",
            "text": "Seven discovery queries were run: exact statement title on Check My Ads; DoubleVerify with April14/2025/preservation; site.doubleverify.com with Check My Ads/legal letter (literal malformed domain operator, not treated as an exhaustive domain search); DoubleVerify/Bradley/Check My Ads; DoubleVerify/Check My Ads/April2025/response; site:doubleverify.com with Adalytics/May12,2025/lawsuit; and site:doubleverify.com with Check My Ads/letter. Read the exact statement and linked letter, the discovered DV response, and scoped portions of the directly surfaced complaint. Secondary news results were discovery context only, not proof of the operative demands or outcome. No broader donor, legal-firm, related-company, or separate-lawsuit branch opened.",
            "matched": [
              "DoubleVerify"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e842aa301551469fbad98c0d88f04e640f1e6ce19a4223fb1ed6f61f76ebb806"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion",
            "heading": "What DoubleVerify actually said",
            "text": "The retained13 February2025 DoubleVerify announcement says it reviewed three years of public NCMEC data as a starting point, analyzed over300 domains/electronic service providers that had received CSAM-related notices, cross-referenced existing classifications, and conducted site-by-site analysis for the remainder while excluding large, well-moderated social/search services. It does not identify those years or the files and columns used.",
            "matched": [
              "DoubleVerify"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "13081987c867105595b5dd35ee80dda4e5a4ad7e72b705aa1f1a4c34d14075d6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Acquisition closed on9 September2026. The historical source family is identified; DoubleVerify's exact three years, files, filters and provider-to-domain mapping remain unestablished.",
            "matched": [
              "DoubleVerify"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "457c4d61883756a3de4154d862dea2aa17c1676d8bfae541c2292210865828d7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          },
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
            "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route"
          },
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          },
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
      "label": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Court-described paid domain/subdomain, impressions and thematic-category reports; Adult Content was broader than pornography.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
        "name": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Court-described paid domain/subdomain, impressions and thematic-category reports; Adult Content was broader than pornography.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Court-described paid domain/subdomain, impressions and thematic-category reports; Adult Content was broader than pornography."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Court-described paid domain/subdomain, impressions and thematic-category reports; Adult Content was broader than pornography.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FilmOn opinion describes DV-defined Adult Content and copyright streaming/file-sharing categories in paid confidential reports. Adult Content encompassed mature themes/language, not only pornography; categorization is not a final infringement judgment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-historical-dv-authorship"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defined and sold confidential classifications",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Inc. — named litigant",
            "targetName": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
            "date": "Historical record described6May2019"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FilmOn alleged reports caused prospective/existing advertisers to refuse business; no adjudicated falsity, damages amount or independent causal estimate is supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-harm-allegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "alleged false labels and advertising harm",
            "sourceName": "FilmOn.com Inc.",
            "targetName": "Historical DoubleVerify confidential website reports",
            "date": "Historical complaint described2019"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
      "label": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "6May2019 reversal uses context/audience/purpose; rejects categorical commercial-speech exclusion without ordering accuracy/remedy.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-filmon-opinion",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
        "name": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "6May2019 reversal uses context/audience/purpose; rejects categorical commercial-speech exclusion without ordering accuracy/remedy.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "6May2019 reversal uses context/audience/purpose; rejects categorical commercial-speech exclusion without ordering accuracy/remedy."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "6May2019 reversal uses context/audience/purpose; rejects categorical commercial-speech exclusion without ordering accuracy/remedy.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "6May2019 Court reversed the prior appellate judgment under public-interest catchall, while rejecting FilmOn's categorical commercial/noncommercial approach. It ordered no reclassification, damages, ad purchase or restoration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-reversal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Supreme Court of California",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "reversed protection for these confidential reports",
            "sourceName": "Supreme Court of California",
            "targetName": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
            "date": "2019-05-06 – 2019-05-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplied expressly applied legal framework",
            "sourceName": "FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision",
            "targetName": "eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
            "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting"
          },
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-filmon-amicus",
      "label": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "MPAA, Hearst, Tegna, California News Publishers Association and First Amendment Coalition requested affirmance; no funding or purchase proved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-filmon-amicus",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-filmon-amicus",
        "name": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "MPAA, Hearst, Tegna, California News Publishers Association and First Amendment Coalition requested affirmance; no funding or purchase proved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "MPAA, Hearst, Tegna, California News Publishers Association and First Amendment Coalition requested affirmance; no funding or purchase proved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "MPAA, Hearst, Tegna, California News Publishers Association and First Amendment Coalition requested affirmance; no funding or purchase proved.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Amici described an anti-piracy advertising mechanism and requested anti-SLAPP protection. Court did not grant that disposition; overlap with concern about categorical commercial-speech exclusion is not causal adoption proof.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-amici-request"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Supreme Court of California",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested affirmance of DV procedural protection",
            "sourceName": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "targetName": "Supreme Court of California",
            "date": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Filed brief names Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. among five media amici. This is the historical advocacy role, not proof of modern contracting identity, purchase of reports or funding of DV.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-mpaa-amicus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Motion Picture Association",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "appeared under historical MPAA name as amicus",
            "sourceName": "Motion Picture Association",
            "targetName": "2018 media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "date": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
            "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
      "label": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Customers choose categories and have specified reporting eligibility; not all affected publishers or verified actual configurations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-advertiser-customers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
        "name": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Customers choose categories and have specified reporting eligibility; not all affected publishers or verified actual configurations.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Customers choose categories and have specified reporting eligibility; not all affected publishers or verified actual configurations."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Customers choose categories and have specified reporting eligibility; not all affected publishers or verified actual configurations.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public product description gives brands category choice, including otherwise legitimate material. It does not disclose override rights for every2025named default or any actual configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-customer-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may choose categories to avoid",
            "sourceName": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "25February2025 statement permits eligible DV advertiser measurement clients to request URL-level detail; interface and other integrations remained future plans in that announcement. It does not grant all publishers every advertiser report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-url-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced requestable URL-level reporting",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "date": "2025-02-25 – 2025-02-25"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FY2025 filing reports90% of revenue from advertisers, mainly measured transaction/impression fees, with some capped spend-based fees. No absolute sum or fee per exclusion inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-advertiser-revenue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "accounted for reported90percent of group revenue",
            "sourceName": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "Fiscal2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-supply-customers",
      "label": "DV supply-side customers — disclosed class",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Consolidated filing describes minimum guarantees/tiered pricing; no named customer contract or fee per exclusion acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-supply-customers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-supply-customers",
        "name": "DV supply-side customers — disclosed class",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Consolidated filing describes minimum guarantees/tiered pricing; no named customer contract or fee per exclusion acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Consolidated filing describes minimum guarantees/tiered pricing; no named customer contract or fee per exclusion acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Consolidated filing describes minimum guarantees/tiered pricing; no named customer contract or fee per exclusion acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FY2025 filing reports10% supply-side revenue with minimum guarantees/tiered pricing. This does not establish biased classification or a payment tied to a specific exclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-supply-revenue"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "accounted for reported10percent of group revenue",
            "sourceName": "DV supply-side customers — disclosed class",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "Fiscal2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
      "label": "DV brand suitability classification service",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Vendor-described AI/human classification, customer categories and pre-bid/post-purchase products; not independently validated operation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv-classifier",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
        "name": "DV brand suitability classification service",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Vendor-described AI/human classification, customer categories and pre-bid/post-purchase products; not independently validated operation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor-described AI/human classification, customer categories and pre-bid/post-purchase products; not independently validated operation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DoubleVerify's brand-suitability service offers website and content classifications for advertisers, using vendor-described automated analysis and human review. Its products support decisions before an advertising purchase and measurement afterward.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial classification translated into advertiser targeting and review",
        "significance": "Brand suitability can affect legitimate material as well as unlawful content because customers choose categories reflecting their own preferences. The classification service therefore sits between a publisher's content and an advertiser's spending. Review access matters when a publisher disputes how that content has been represented.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Configuration and correction route",
            "text": "The product page describes more than one hundred customer-selectable categories and separate pre-bid and post-purchase products. A June 2024 statement describes publisher classification review and report-log access, with review separated from sales and client teams. The retained sources do not provide an independent adjudicator, a decision deadline or a worked correction requiring advertisers to reconsider. Vendor descriptions establish the offered mechanisms rather than independently measured accuracy or a named customer's settings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-classifier-offer",
              "w30-class-e-dv-customer-choice",
              "w30-class-e-dv-review-route",
              "w30-class-e-dv-business-reporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public product description gives brands category choice, including otherwise legitimate material. It does not disclose override rights for every2025named default or any actual configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-customer-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may choose categories to avoid",
            "sourceName": "DV advertiser customers — disclosed class",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "June2024 statement describes classification-review/report-log access and separation from sales/client teams. No independent adjudicator, decision deadline, worked correction or mandatory advertiser reconsideration acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-review-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes publisher review and sales separation",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": "2024-06-13 – 2024-06-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Current product page describes AI/human review, more than100 customer-selectable categories and separate pre-bid/post-purchase services. Vendor claims are not independent deployment or accuracy evidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-classifier-offer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes proprietary classification service",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The issuer describes configuration/classification and customer feedback in product development. Consolidated disclosure is not proof of the exact historical FilmOn contracting party.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-business-reporting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports consolidated configuration and service model",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "targetName": "DV brand suitability classification service",
            "date": "FY2025 report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "label": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Vendor category/default uses selected inputs and its own judgment; not equivalent to all NCMEC reports or IWF raw URL list.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-hi-category",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "name": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Vendor category/default uses selected inputs and its own judgment; not equivalent to all NCMEC reports or IWF raw URL list.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor category/default uses selected inputs and its own judgment; not equivalent to all NCMEC reports or IWF raw URL list."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize is a DoubleVerify category introduced in 2025 to affect advertising suitability decisions. Its construction uses selected external information and the vendor's own judgement, rather than simply reproducing every notification or URL in an outside source.",
        "structuralRole": "Vendor-defined default connecting external signals to advertising eligibility",
        "significance": "The category is a translation step: source material about provider behaviour becomes a commercial classification distributed through advertising products. Defaults can widen its practical reach, while customer activation and overrides determine particular effects. The input, the vendor's interpretation and the resulting buyer action are therefore separate questions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Announcement, reported operation and new inputs",
            "text": "On 13 February 2025 DoubleVerify announced that this category and a peer-to-peer category would be enabled by default, with distribution to more than one hundred platform partners. Its 24 April release reported default enablement as operational. That release and IWF's May announcement described future URL List incorporation; a later IWF annual-report testimonial describes integration of IWF signals. These dated company accounts do not establish an exact deployment date, every customer's configuration or a recipient-wide correction chain.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
              "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
              "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
              "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
              "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
              "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
              "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
              "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "DV's own account connects selected public material to its new Highly Illicit policy through additional judgment. The acquired2021–2023tables explain why units matter but are not proven to be the exact files used.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-input-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as an input to vendor category",
            "sourceName": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced future default enablement",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "DV member testimonial in IWF's2025report section describes integration of IWF signals. No exact deployment date, delivery log or downstream correction chain is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as integrated in DV testimonial",
            "sourceName": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "2025report section; publication date unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "April24 DV release and May8 IWF counterpart describe future incorporation of the URL List. They are partnership plans, not executed data terms or tested ingestion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was announced as planned integration",
            "sourceName": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "April–May2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported enabled default",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "February release reports distribution to more than100 platform partners; this is not a count of activated recipients or blocked services.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported distributed to over100 partners",
            "sourceName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "targetName": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-p2p-category",
      "label": "P2P Sharing and Streaming — DV category",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Vendor-described avoidance category includes infrastructure with legitimate uses; no judicial illegality of every service inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-p2p-category",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-p2p-category",
        "name": "P2P Sharing and Streaming — DV category",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Vendor-described avoidance category includes infrastructure with legitimate uses; no judicial illegality of every service inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Vendor-described avoidance category includes infrastructure with legitimate uses; no judicial illegality of every service inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Vendor-described avoidance category includes infrastructure with legitimate uses; no judicial illegality of every service inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-default-announced-p2p-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced future default enablement",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "P2P Sharing and Streaming — DV category",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-default-reported-p2p-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported enabled default",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "P2P Sharing and Streaming — DV category",
            "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "A classification matters because someone acts on it",
            "text": "Advertising classification adds a question about scale: is the object a page, channel or whole domain? February 2025 Senate letters questioned financing a website even where advertisements avoided prohibited material. DoubleVerify subsequently announced default Highly Illicit and P2P Sharing and Streaming categories and later reported implementation. The chronology does not establish that the letters uniquely caused the change. NCMEC notifications, DV's assessment and its later IWF relationship are different inputs. Announced defaults do not constitute our observation of customer settings, and general customer-choice language does not prove an override in every configuration. A14",
            "matched": [
              "P2P Sharing and Streaming"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7cca00cb123d89a9fe9a8ff2d57b54b5765b15825a7d7a2d6879984c55db7647"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
      "label": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "More than100 distribution partners announced February2025; nearly30 implementations reported April2025 without names/logs.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv-platforms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
        "name": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "More than100 distribution partners announced February2025; nearly30 implementations reported April2025 without names/logs.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "More than100 distribution partners announced February2025; nearly30 implementations reported April2025 without names/logs."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "commercial-classification-remedy",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "More than100 distribution partners announced February2025; nearly30 implementations reported April2025 without names/logs.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "April24 release says nearly30 platforms implemented Highly Illicit and offers the category free to all platforms, including nonclients. No named platform logs, blocked-site count or raw-IWF-data redistribution licence proved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-adoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported nearly30 category implementations",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
            "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "February release reports distribution to more than100 platform partners; this is not a count of activated recipients or blocked services.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported distributed to over100 partners",
            "sourceName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "targetName": "DV platform partners — reported implementation class",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
      "label": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Notice/response aggregates with repeated contacts, mixed provider responses and three2023content categories. Exact DV input files/filters remain unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
        "name": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Notice/response aggregates with repeated contacts, mixed provider responses and three2023content categories. Exact DV input files/filters remain unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Notice/response aggregates with repeated contacts, mixed provider responses and three2023content categories. Exact DV input files/filters remain unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Notice/response aggregates with repeated contacts, mixed provider responses and three2023content categories. Exact DV input files/filters remain unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Methodology describes staff visual review and tracked notifications, including repeated notices and possible upstream contacts.2023columns separate CSAM, non-CSAM exploitative images of identified victims and predatory text. Mixed response tables are not permanent whole-company labels or unique-incident counts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes reviewed-notice and response aggregates",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
            "date": "Reporting2021–2023; first publication dates not established"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "DV letter cites the2021outbound-notification table. This is an explicit source reference, not proof DV selected that exact file or that every row denotes illegal domains.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-ncmec-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies specifically cited2021 notice-table reference",
            "sourceName": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-ncmec-incoming",
      "label": "NCMEC2023 incoming CyberTipline report table",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Reports submitted by providers, not outbound notices, unique incidents or confirmed criminal domains.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-ncmec-incoming",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-ncmec-incoming",
        "name": "NCMEC2023 incoming CyberTipline report table",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Reports submitted by providers, not outbound notices, unique incidents or confirmed criminal domains.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reports submitted by providers, not outbound notices, unique incidents or confirmed criminal domains."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Reports submitted by providers, not outbound notices, unique incidents or confirmed criminal domains.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "2023table counts incoming provider reports about suspected exploitation/apparent CSAM. Variation in detection/reporting and included information prevents reading totals as outbound notices or confirmed criminal domains.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-incoming"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes provider-submitted report counts",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "NCMEC2023 incoming CyberTipline report table",
            "date": "Reporting2023"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
      "label": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "DV says three years and over300domains/providers as a starting point, followed by its own assessment; exact dataset/columns and identity mapping not disclosed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
        "name": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "DV says three years and over300domains/providers as a starting point, followed by its own assessment; exact dataset/columns and identity mapping not disclosed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "DV says three years and over300domains/providers as a starting point, followed by its own assessment; exact dataset/columns and identity mapping not disclosed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DV says three years and over300domains/providers as a starting point, followed by its own assessment; exact dataset/columns and identity mapping not disclosed.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "DV says it reviewed three years/over300domains or providers, cross-checked existing classifications, assessed remaining sites and excluded large well-moderated social/search services. Exact years/files/columns/provider-domain mapping unknown; no misuse finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports source selection and further assessment",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "DV's own account connects selected public material to its new Highly Illicit policy through additional judgment. The acquired2021–2023tables explain why units matter but are not proven to be the exact files used.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-input-category"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as an input to vendor category",
            "sourceName": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "DV identifies public NCMEC data as a starting point. This does not establish direct supply agreement, endorsement or equivalence to NCMEC's hash-sharing resource.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named as public-data origin by DV",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown",
            "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
            "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-iwf-url",
      "label": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Specialist URL-level resource with published upstream maintenance; not equivalent to an entire DV domain category.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-iwf-url",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-iwf-url",
        "name": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Specialist URL-level resource with published upstream maintenance; not equivalent to an entire DV domain category.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Specialist URL-level resource with published upstream maintenance; not equivalent to an entire DV domain category."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Specialist URL-level resource with published upstream maintenance; not equivalent to an entire DV domain category.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "IWF says URLs are rechecked daily, removed the same day when relevant content is absent, with twice-daily list updates. This is upstream maintenance evidence, not observed DV reclassification or restored placements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removal",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "date": "2025report section; publication date unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "DV member testimonial in IWF's2025report section describes integration of IWF signals. No exact deployment date, delivery log or downstream correction chain is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as integrated in DV testimonial",
            "sourceName": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "2025report section; publication date unknown"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "April24 DV release and May8 IWF counterpart describe future incorporation of the URL List. They are partnership plans, not executed data terms or tested ingestion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was announced as planned integration",
            "sourceName": "IWF assessed URL List — DV input scope",
            "targetName": "Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category",
            "date": "April–May2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-iwf-members",
      "label": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Members may apply/nominate to Funding Council; membership does not prove a particular member seat or assessment veto.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-iwf-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-iwf-members",
        "name": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Members may apply/nominate to Funding Council; membership does not prove a particular member seat or assessment veto.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Members may apply/nominate to Funding Council; membership does not prove a particular member seat or assessment veto."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership benefits",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Members may apply/nominate to Funding Council; membership does not prove a particular member seat or assessment veto.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Membership pages describe licensed dynamic lists/alerts, analyst contact, research, policy participation and publicity. No executed SLA, raw-list redistribution entitlement or proof DV used all benefits acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-member-resources"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF membership benefits",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes licensed lists, expertise and participation benefits",
            "sourceName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "targetName": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Current pricing describes sector/size-based annual GBP fees from£5,000+ to£100,000+ supporting frontline work. This is general current pricing, not the2025DV tariff or proof of a particular cash payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-fee-framework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "support services under stated annual fee framework",
            "sourceName": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current overview permits Funding Council application; FY2025report describes nomination opportunity. No automatic member seat or exercised DV nomination inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-application"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may apply or nominate representatives",
            "sourceName": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "targetName": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership benefits",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
            "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-iwf-council",
      "label": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Report describes industry advice and election of three industry trustees; not proof DV participated.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-iwf-council",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-iwf-council",
        "name": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Report describes industry advice and election of three industry trustees; not proof DV participated.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Report describes industry advice and election of three industry trustees; not proof DV participated."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Internet Watch Foundation Funding Council is the industry-advice and trustee-election body described in IWF's membership materials and FY2025 report. Membership materials provide an application route rather than an automatic Council seat.",
        "structuralRole": "Route from industry membership to advice and trustee election",
        "significance": "The Council makes part of the relationship between funders or members and governance explicit. It offers advice and elects industry trustees, while Board approval remains a further step. This is useful evidence of structured influence without presuming that every member exercises it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation route",
            "text": "The current membership overview permits Funding Council applications, and the FY2025 report describes nomination opportunities and election of three industry trustees. The acquired material does not show that DoubleVerify applied, nominated anyone or obtained a seat. Nor does the Council role establish authority to override a particular URL assessment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-application",
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-elections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current overview permits Funding Council application; FY2025report describes nomination opportunity. No automatic member seat or exercised DV nomination inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-application"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may apply or nominate representatives",
            "sourceName": "IWF funding members — governance opportunity class",
            "targetName": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY2025report says Council supports Board with industry advice and elects three industry trustees. Board approves appointments through described processes; no reserved DV seat or individual assessment veto established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-elections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF Board — FY2025 account",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "elects three industry trustees in dated report",
            "sourceName": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
            "targetName": "IWF Board — FY2025 account",
            "date": "FY ended31March2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
            "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-iwf-board",
      "label": "IWF Board — FY2025 account",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Dated report describes11-person composition and appointment approval processes; no unchanged2026 composition inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-iwf-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-iwf-board",
        "name": "IWF Board — FY2025 account",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Dated report describes11-person composition and appointment approval processes; no unchanged2026 composition inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated report describes11-person composition and appointment approval processes; no unchanged2026 composition inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Internet Watch Foundation Board is described in its FY2025 report as an eleven-person governing body combining independent, industry and co-opted trustees. The profile records that reported arrangement, rather than assuming unchanged membership in 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body with structured industry representation",
        "significance": "The Board connects institutional oversight to a defined route for industry participation. Three industry trustees provide representation within a broader composition that also includes independent trustees. That is a specific governance relationship, not evidence that an individual member company controls a particular assessment or list entry.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported composition and appointments",
            "text": "The FY2025 report describes an independent chair, six other independent trustees, three industry trustees and one co-opted trustee. The Funding Council supplies industry advice and elects the three industry trustees, with Board approval through the described appointment processes. The record does not identify a reserved DoubleVerify seat or a company veto over classifications.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-elections",
              "w30-class-e-iwf-board-appointments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY2025report says Council supports Board with industry advice and elects three industry trustees. Board approves appointments through described processes; no reserved DV seat or individual assessment veto established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-council-elections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "elects three industry trustees in dated report",
            "sourceName": "IWF Funding Council — FY2025 account",
            "targetName": "IWF Board — FY2025 account",
            "date": "FY ended31March2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FY2025report describes11-person Board: independent chair, six other independent trustees, three industry trustees and one co-opted trustee. This is the report's arrangement, not proof of unchanged2026 composition.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-iwf-board-appointments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
                "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "approves appointments under described processes",
            "sourceName": "IWF Board — FY2025 account",
            "targetName": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "date": "FY ended31March2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
            "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-blackburn",
      "label": "Marsha Blackburn",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Senator signing the February2025 requests; no enforcement order.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-blackburn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-blackburn",
        "name": "Marsha Blackburn",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Senator signing the February2025 requests; no enforcement order.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Senator signing the February2025 requests; no enforcement order."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Marsha Blackburn is the US senator who jointly signed the February 2025 advertising-safety inquiry letters with Richard Blumenthal. The letters seek information from DoubleVerify and scrutiny of industry certification bodies.",
        "structuralRole": "Senator directing scrutiny toward advertising verification and accreditation",
        "significance": "Blackburn's role places private advertising classifications before public oversight. The letters reach beyond a disputed ad placement to ask how verification services and certifiers respond when problems arise, creating a route for reputational and political pressure on industry standards.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the signed letters request",
            "text": "The letters address DoubleVerify, the Media Rating Council and the Trustworthy Accountability Group, requesting responses by 14 February 2025. They ask about safeguards, audits, fees and certification consequences. The acquired documents are requests rather than subpoenas, operative enforcement orders or evidence that accreditation was revoked.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senator-blackburn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senator-blackburn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed February7 requests",
            "sourceName": "Marsha Blackburn",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Named in the Alliance’s public event listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-blackburn-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advertised speaker",
            "sourceName": "Marsha Blackburn",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
            "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-blumenthal",
      "label": "Richard Blumenthal",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Senator signing the February2025 requests; no enforcement order.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-blumenthal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-blumenthal",
        "name": "Richard Blumenthal",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Senator signing the February2025 requests; no enforcement order.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Senator signing the February2025 requests; no enforcement order."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Richard Blumenthal is the US senator who jointly signed the February 2025 advertising-safety inquiry letters with Marsha Blackburn. Their requests focus on DoubleVerify's practices and the responsibilities of advertising accreditation organisations.",
        "structuralRole": "Co-signing senator in scrutiny of private advertising safeguards",
        "significance": "Blumenthal's participation connects the issue to a joint Senate initiative whose targets include both a commercial verifier and the organisations that certify industry practice. This can challenge the adequacy of a standard as well as compliance with it, without itself changing that standard.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented intervention",
            "text": "The signed letters request answers by 14 February 2025 from DoubleVerify, the Media Rating Council and the Trustworthy Accountability Group. Questions concern blocking, remediation, notification and certification review or revocation. The record does not establish a subpoena, mandatory enforcement order, completed company response or sanction attributable to the letters.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senator-blumenthal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senator-blumenthal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed February7 requests",
            "sourceName": "Richard Blumenthal",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Documented requests and14February response deadline, not subpoena, violation finding or actual sanction.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "name": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Documented requests and14February response deadline, not subpoena, violation finding or actual sanction.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Documented requests and14February response deadline, not subpoena, violation finding or actual sanction."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          },
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The February 2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry consists of letters seeking information about ad placement, verification and industry certification following Adalytics research. The senators requested responses by 14 February from DoubleVerify and relevant accreditation bodies.",
        "structuralRole": "Public scrutiny joining research claims, commercial safeguards and certification",
        "significance": "The inquiry broadens a technical dispute into questions about institutional responsibility. It asks not only whether a verifier blocked particular material, but whether certifiers should permit firms to monetise a website associated with illegal activity while avoiding the prohibited content itself. That is a proposed responsibility boundary, not an adopted rule.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Inputs and demands",
            "text": "The Senate office says the senators received Adalytics research before publication. Their DoubleVerify letter asks about remediation, advertiser notification, NCMEC information, authority reports and related revenue. Letters to the Media Rating Council and TAG ask about audits, fee policies and review or revocation. Check My Ads credits its advocacy with helping the inquiry, but the Senate documents do not establish its drafting role. These are documented requests, without a subpoena, violation finding or observed sanction.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              },
              {
                "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
              },
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senator-blackburn",
              "w30-class-e-senator-blumenthal",
              "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
              "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
              "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
              "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
              "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
              "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "TAG letter asks whether certified firms may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity while avoiding prohibited content itself, alongside review/revocation questions. This proposed broader responsibility is not a proven adopted ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "questions certification and whole-website monetization",
            "sourceName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "targetName": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter asks about blocking/remediation, advertiser notification, annual NCMEC-report use, authority reports and related revenue; answers requested by14February. Questions are not proof of underlying violations or completed compliance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests remediation, data-use and revenue answers",
            "sourceName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter challenges MRC about certification, audits, fee policies and revocation. Its cited2018guidance was not freshly acquired; no accreditor breach or executed revocation inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Media Rating Council",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests review, audit and possible revocation explanations",
            "sourceName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "targetName": "Media Rating Council",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Footnote7 cites an Arielle Garcia trial-update article. The underlying testimony/article was not inspected; citation does not establish letter authorship or adoption of all claims.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-garcia-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Arielle Garcia article cited in TAG letter",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is expressly cited in TAG letter",
            "sourceName": "Arielle Garcia article cited in TAG letter",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senator-blackburn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marsha Blackburn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed February7 requests",
            "sourceName": "Marsha Blackburn",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "DV letter cites the2021outbound-notification table. This is an explicit source reference, not proof DV selected that exact file or that every row denotes illegal domains.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-ncmec-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
                "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies specifically cited2021 notice-table reference",
            "sourceName": "NCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Senate office announcement says senators received Adalytics research before public release. Underlying full technical report/methods were not inspected in this lane; no merits finding follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provided research described as available before release",
            "sourceName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CMA says its advocacy helped the inquiry. Senate records independently establish requests but do not credit CMA with drafting; no sole-cause claim.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-cma-contribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
              },
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "claims advocacy contribution",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          },
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
            "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "Check My Ads",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An advocacy organisation pressing advertisers, advertising intermediaries and regulators to stop revenue reaching material it considers harmful.",
      "aliases": [
        "CMA",
        "CheckMyAds"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advertising accountability campaign"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-cma",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-cma",
        "name": "Check My Ads",
        "role": "Advertising accountability campaign",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "An advocacy organisation pressing advertisers, advertising intermediaries and regulators to stop revenue reaching material it considers harmful.",
        "why": "It works at the point where speech, advertising income and platform eligibility meet. Its consultation proposals offer a direct way to inspect the powers it wants intermediaries to use.",
        "about": [
          "Its Ofcom submission requested customer checks for monetising creators and advertisers and clearance before monetisation when risk indicators appear. These proposals concern commercial participation and can affect pseudonymity and income.",
          "Ofcom considered but did not recommend specific monetisation practices in one crisis-response measure. That is a documented limit on uptake, not evidence that every other request was either accepted or rejected."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "CMA",
          "CheckMyAds"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
          "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 14
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An advocacy organisation pressing advertisers, advertising intermediaries and regulators to stop revenue reaching material it considers harmful.",
        "structuralRole": "Advocacy aimed at advertising and vendor decisions",
        "significance": "Check My Ads works on the advertising relationships that fund publishers. Its complaints and public pressure make the route from advocacy to vendor or buyer decisions visible, including where those recipients retain their own discretion.",
        "background": [
          "Its Ofcom submission requested customer checks for monetising creators and advertisers and clearance before monetisation when risk indicators appear. These proposals concern commercial participation and can affect pseudonymity and income.",
          "Ofcom considered but did not recommend specific monetisation practices in one crisis-response measure. That is a documented limit on uptake, not evidence that every other request was either accepted or rejected."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Ford reports USD200000 General Support, approvedOctober2022 for October2022–September2023. This is an approved award, not payment or support earmarked to a later2025 campaign. Financial details: value: 200,000; currency: USD; kind: approved grant; period: October2022–September2023 Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ford2022"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
                "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ford Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approved general support",
            "sourceName": "Ford Foundation",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Approval month2022-10; stated term2022-10 through2023-09; exact days unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Arielle Garcia care of CMA; asks confirmation by noonEDT16April. It demands neither immediate production, retraction nor cessation. Actual confirmation/compliance not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests preservation and confirmation",
            "sourceName": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom hosts CMA's31-page additional-safety response. The11December2025 listing date is not an independently established submission date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-cmapublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provided a consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "date": "2025 consultation; exact submission day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak's2025 report lists USD600000 over three years for CMA core support promoting transparency and fairness in digital advertising. Award is not annual expenditure, cash payment, exact grant-start date, or an earmark to the Ofcom response. Oak contracting group entity is unspecified. Financial details: value: 600,000; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact term dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Printed grantee is Check My Ads; row does not supply EIN or contracting Oak entity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-oakcma"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a three-year core grant",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "2025 report; exact approval/start/end dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Donor-authored2023 report lists DKK1991232, term1May2023–1May2025, to cut climate-change and election disinformation off at the source. Not a traced allocation to the February2025 child-safety letters. Financial details: value: 1,991,232; currency: DKK; kind: reported grant; period: 1May2023–1May2025 Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-kr2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
                "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a climate/election disinformation grant",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Inclusive stated grant term, not disbursement dates; granted in2023, exact approval day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The donor's2023 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD450000 is a reader/discovery candidate whose row alignment was not visually verified, so no precise amount is encoded. A separate future-payment entry is not a second payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-democracy2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
                "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported paid general support",
            "sourceName": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Calendar2023; individual payment date unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CMA's2024 graphic labels major donors59, foundations30 and individuals11. These chart values have no explicit percent sign or dollar denominator; 490 recurring donors and the separate Checkmates60/one-time40 chart are distinct measures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-mix2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA reported funding mix — 2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a funding-source chart",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "CMA reported funding mix — 2024",
            "date": "Report period2024; publication pathFebruary2025 is not the accounting period."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "16April statement says it will comply with legal obligations but views demand as overbroad and will continue work. This is a position, not completed preservation or judicial overbreadth finding; no measured chilling effect established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-cma-objection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publicly objects while asserting legal compliance",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "date": "2025-04-16 – 2025-04-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Closed bounded acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet concerns Check My Ads Institute's response to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures consultation, not an enacted CMA rule. The consultation opened 30 June and closed 20 October 2025. Its regulator-hosted response entry is dated 11 December 2025; that is the displayed publication/listing date, not an independently established submission date.",
            "matched": [
              "Check My Ads"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e5812e87f1876ad54793b995b2c8a039c755451dad32c229c510d509b68f321c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint",
            "heading": "Structural interpretation and unresolved record",
            "text": "Two mechanisms are now evidenced: DV counsel to Check My Ads, preservation demand under a stated litigation threat; and DV corporate plaintiffs to Adalytics, filed claims seeking damages and correction. The shared subject matter and counsel do not erase their different addressees or procedural states. A public research-to-lawmakers route was within the letter's requested preservation scope; it was not shown to be prohibited by an exercised court power.",
            "matched": [
              "Check My Ads"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0c00dfa46acc389247b062d8c2df010b5641ea0bba8567db94fbf1635bb199d7"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint",
            "heading": "Structural interpretation and unresolved record",
            "text": "The most discriminating missing records are Check My Ads' actual response/confirmation and any later filed instrument specifically naming it; for the Adalytics branch, the court's subsequent disposition or an executed settlement would distinguish requested correction from achieved correction. A public rebuttal and a demand letter can be both reputation defense and pressure on a critic; these sources alone do not decide the merits or measure downstream chilling.",
            "matched": [
              "Check My Ads"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8560603d84b1042f96378d1ad67a11319c821215670b5c6a0a896e2b50de63f3"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Shared resources do not settle the policy position",
            "text": "Oak's grants make an instructive comparison. Its published 2025 awards include three-year support to Check My Ads, Digital Freedom Fund and Statewatch. Statewatch endorsed objections to broad scanning and possible identity requirements in the EU child-abuse proposal; the WeProtect Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in a different, earlier version of that debate. The comparison is evidence of divergent interventions, not a same-draft controlled experiment.",
            "matched": [
              "Check My Ads"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "981e2dd7575f1dc57c9901eb0de21eeedcc8ae7ad1915689d6c034e36966ad77"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
            "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
            "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix"
          },
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          },
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Donor resources behind CMA capacity: Democracy Fund and Ford"
          },
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap"
          },
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          },
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
            "title": "Oak support for Check My Ads: a verified grant, bounded terms"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-adalytics",
      "label": "Adalytics Research LLC",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Research source identified by Senate release and defendant in May2025 DV complaint; technical merits not adjudicated here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-adalytics",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-adalytics",
        "name": "Adalytics Research LLC",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Research source identified by Senate release and defendant in May2025 DV complaint; technical merits not adjudicated here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Research source identified by Senate release and defendant in May2025 DV complaint; technical merits not adjudicated here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Adalytics Research LLC is the advertising-research firm identified as an input to the February 2025 Senate inquiry and as defendant in DoubleVerify's May 2025 complaint. Its technical claims prompted company rebuttals and scrutiny of advertising safeguards.",
        "structuralRole": "Research supplier whose claims enter political and legal disputes",
        "significance": "Adalytics connects technical criticism to audiences with different powers: senators can demand explanations, customers can reassess services, and a criticised company can litigate. The pathway is documented even where the underlying technical merits remain unresolved. It is therefore important to separate dissemination from validation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Research, rebuttal and litigation",
            "text": "The Senate office says senators received Adalytics research before public release. DoubleVerify's 7 February and 7 April responses dispute technical conclusions and describe remedial or development work. On 12 May, DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc. filed a complaint naming Adalytics as the sole defendant and seeking monetary and corrective relief. The retained lane did not inspect the complete underlying technical study or establish a later merits judgment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
              "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
              "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april",
              "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
              "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pleading asks compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs/fees and corrective relief. These are requested, not granted; CMA is not its named defendant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "seeks damages, retraction and corrective advertising",
            "sourceName": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "targetName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "February7 company response disputes technical conclusions, reports extra blocking/review and a P2P category under development. It is interested-party response, not independently audited test data; temporal overlap with letters does not isolate causation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "disputes interpretation and reports added safeguards",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "7April company statement challenges bot/billing/code and detection claims, including alleged misleading government representations. Merits and actual billable adjustments were not independently audited; this predates the14April letter.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
                "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes technical and commercial rebuttal",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify — product and membership brand",
            "targetName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Senate office announcement says senators received Adalytics research before public release. Underlying full technical report/methods were not inspected in this lane; no merits finding follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provided research described as available before release",
            "sourceName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          },
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          },
          {
            "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
            "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-mrc",
      "label": "Media Rating Council",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Recipient of Senate review/revocation questions; no compliance finding or revocation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-mrc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-mrc",
        "name": "Media Rating Council",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Recipient of Senate review/revocation questions; no compliance finding or revocation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recipient of Senate review/revocation questions; no compliance finding or revocation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient of Senate review/revocation questions; no compliance finding or revocation.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter challenges MRC about certification, audits, fee policies and revocation. Its cited2018guidance was not freshly acquired; no accreditor breach or executed revocation inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests review, audit and possible revocation explanations",
            "sourceName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "targetName": "Media Rating Council",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-tag",
      "label": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Recipient of Senate pressure; later reports no BSC violations and additional training. Its determination is not independent exoneration.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-tag",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-tag",
        "name": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Recipient of Senate pressure; later reports no BSC violations and additional training. Its determination is not independent exoneration.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recipient of Senate pressure; later reports no BSC violations and additional training. Its determination is not independent exoneration."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
            "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Trustworthy Accountability Group is an advertising-industry certification organisation addressed in the February 2025 Senate inquiry. It later reported investigating the matter under its Brand Safety Certified guidelines and finding no violations by the investigated companies.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry certifier whose standards and determinations face public scrutiny",
        "significance": "TAG sits between advertising companies seeking certification and audiences relying on that certification. The dispute tests both compliance and the scope of the standard: a clean determination under existing guidelines may coexist with political demands for a broader responsibility. The two claims answer different questions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Inquiry and reported determination",
            "text": "The senators asked whether certified firms could monetise a website engaged in illegal activity while avoiding the prohibited content itself, along with review and revocation questions. TAG's 2025 report and February 2026 announcement report no Brand Safety Certified violations, explain accreditation limits and refer to a twenty-three-page response. That is TAG's own determination; the complete response and named findings were not acquired for independent assessment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
                "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
                "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
              "w30-class-e-tag-determination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "TAG letter asks whether certified firms may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity while avoiding prohibited content itself, alongside review/revocation questions. This proposed broader responsibility is not a proven adopted ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "questions certification and whole-website monetization",
            "sourceName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "targetName": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "TAG reports that none of investigated companies violated BSC guidelines, explains accreditation limits and cites a23-page response. This is TAG's own determination, not independent exoneration; named findings and reply remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-tag-determination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
                "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
                "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TAG2025 BSC inquiry determination — reported",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports no investigated BSC guideline violations",
            "sourceName": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "targetName": "TAG2025 BSC inquiry determination — reported",
            "date": "2025report; release3February2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
            "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-tag-threat-members",
      "label": "TAG threat-exchange members — training recipient class",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "TAG describes members receiving NCMEC training; no operational shared database or participant list.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Group of participants"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-tag-threat-members",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-tag-threat-members",
        "name": "TAG threat-exchange members — training recipient class",
        "role": "Group of participants",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "TAG describes members receiving NCMEC training; no operational shared database or participant list.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "TAG describes members receiving NCMEC training; no operational shared database or participant list."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "TAG describes members receiving NCMEC training; no operational shared database or participant list.",
        "structuralRole": "Group of participants",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "TAG's visible report describes NCMEC training for threat-exchange members. No operational shared dataset, database access or training-content adoption is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-tag-ncmec-training"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
                "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was reported to train threat-exchange members",
            "sourceName": "National Center for Missing & Exploited Children",
            "targetName": "TAG threat-exchange members — training recipient class",
            "date": "2025report"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-tag-response",
      "label": "TAG2025 BSC inquiry determination — reported",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Visible2025report PDF20–21 says none of investigated companies violated BSC.23-page response and underlying findings not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-tag-response",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-tag-response",
        "name": "TAG2025 BSC inquiry determination — reported",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Visible2025report PDF20–21 says none of investigated companies violated BSC.23-page response and underlying findings not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Visible2025report PDF20–21 says none of investigated companies violated BSC.23-page response and underlying findings not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
            "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Visible2025report PDF20–21 says none of investigated companies violated BSC.23-page response and underlying findings not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "TAG reports that none of investigated companies violated BSC guidelines, explains accreditation limits and cites a23-page response. This is TAG's own determination, not independent exoneration; named findings and reply remain not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-tag-determination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
                "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
                "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports no investigated BSC guideline violations",
            "sourceName": "Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "targetName": "TAG2025 BSC inquiry determination — reported",
            "date": "2025report; release3February2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
            "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-garcia-citation",
      "label": "Arielle Garcia article cited in TAG letter",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Citation-only input established by letter footnote7. Underlying article/testimony not read; no inference of letter authorship.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-garcia-citation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-garcia-citation",
        "name": "Arielle Garcia article cited in TAG letter",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Citation-only input established by letter footnote7. Underlying article/testimony not read; no inference of letter authorship.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Citation-only input established by letter footnote7. Underlying article/testimony not read; no inference of letter authorship."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Citation-only input established by letter footnote7. Underlying article/testimony not read; no inference of letter authorship.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Footnote7 cites an Arielle Garcia trial-update article. The underlying testimony/article was not inspected; citation does not establish letter authorship or adoption of all claims.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-garcia-citation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
                "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is expressly cited in TAG letter",
            "sourceName": "Arielle Garcia article cited in TAG letter",
            "targetName": "February2025 Blackburn–Blumenthal advertising inquiry",
            "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
            "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-bondi",
      "label": "Bradley J. Bondi",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named/signed counsel for DV in recipient-published preservation letter and listed counsel in later pleading. No legal-firm finance inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-bondi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-bondi",
        "name": "Bradley J. Bondi",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Named/signed counsel for DV in recipient-published preservation letter and listed counsel in later pleading. No legal-firm finance inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named/signed counsel for DV in recipient-published preservation letter and listed counsel in later pleading. No legal-firm finance inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Bradley J. Bondi is the lawyer named as representing DoubleVerify Holdings in an April 2025 preservation letter to Check My Ads. The later DoubleVerify complaint against Adalytics also lists him among counsel.",
        "structuralRole": "Legal representative linking preservation demands and subsequent litigation",
        "significance": "Counsel provides a formal route for a commercial company to contest criticism and preserve evidence relevant to potential claims. The documents establish Bondi's representation and continuity of subject matter, while leaving legal fees, ownership and any wider client coordination outside the supported record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The acquired legal documents",
            "text": "The recipient-published 14 April letter uses Paul Hastings letterhead and seeks preservation of DoubleVerify, Adalytics and government-communication materials. It is a lawyer's demand, not a court order. The 12 May complaint names Adalytics, rather than Check My Ads, as defendant and seeks damages and corrective relief. Those requested remedies had not been shown granted in the retained record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-bondi-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Recipient-published letter names Bondi acting for DoubleVerify Holdings on Paul Hastings letterhead. No fee or ownership relation follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-bondi-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "signed preservation letter as counsel",
            "sourceName": "Bradley J. Bondi",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint",
            "heading": "4. A filed case was found, but do not change its defendant",
            "text": "The requested remedies include compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs and fees, and an order for retraction and corrective advertising. They are prayers for relief, not granted remedies. The signature page lists Paul Hastings counsel, including Bondi, alongside signing counsel Kwame J. Manley. This gives documentary continuity of counsel and subject matter, not proof of a particular preservation response or a case against Check My Ads. [PDF31 prayer A–E; PDF32 signature.]",
            "matched": [
              "Bondi"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3235bd4cfde44aaf920c73847ce78ea622e111672c09601117612fe8c82c12db"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-paul-hastings",
      "label": "Paul Hastings LLP",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Firm on preservation letter and complaint; no fee, ownership or extra-client relation acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-paul-hastings",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-paul-hastings",
        "name": "Paul Hastings LLP",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Firm on preservation letter and complaint; no fee, ownership or extra-client relation acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Firm on preservation letter and complaint; no fee, ownership or extra-client relation acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Firm on preservation letter and complaint; no fee, ownership or extra-client relation acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-firm-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named counsel in demand and pleading",
            "sourceName": "Paul Hastings LLP",
            "targetName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "date": "April–May2025"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
      "label": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Recipient-published redacted counsel letter seeks preservation and confirmation by16April; not production/retraction or court order.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-preservation-letter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
        "name": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Recipient-published redacted counsel letter seeks preservation and confirmation by16April; not production/retraction or court order.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recipient-published redacted counsel letter seeks preservation and confirmation by16April; not production/retraction or court order."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient-published redacted counsel letter seeks preservation and confirmation by16April; not production/retraction or court order.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-dv-preservation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued counsel demand under anticipated litigation",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "targetName": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Addressed to Arielle Garcia care of CMA; asks confirmation by noonEDT16April. It demands neither immediate production, retraction nor cessation. Actual confirmation/compliance not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requests preservation and confirmation",
            "sourceName": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "16April statement says it will comply with legal obligations but views demand as overbroad and will continue work. This is a position, not completed preservation or judicial overbreadth finding; no measured chilling effect established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-cma-objection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publicly objects while asserting legal compliance",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "14April2025 DV preservation demand",
            "date": "2025-04-16 – 2025-04-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
      "label": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Stamped Document1 in8:25-cv-01535 names Adalytics only as defendant; allegations and requested remedies unadjudicated.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w30-class-dv-complaint",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
        "name": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "Stamped Document1 in8:25-cv-01535 names Adalytics only as defendant; allegations and requested remedies unadjudicated.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Stamped Document1 in8:25-cv-01535 names Adalytics only as defendant; allegations and requested remedies unadjudicated."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "advertising-input-and-pressure",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is Document 1 in federal case 8:25-cv-01535, filed on 12 May 2025 by DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. against Adalytics Research LLC. It records the plaintiffs' allegations and requested relief.",
        "structuralRole": "Filed claim seeking monetary and reputational remedies for disputed criticism",
        "significance": "The complaint turns a public dispute about advertising measurement into a legal proceeding. Its parties and prayers for relief identify who is being sued and what intervention is sought. Allegations about another organisation's amplification remain part of the plaintiffs' theory, rather than findings or additional defendants.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Parties and requested remedies",
            "text": "Adalytics is the sole named defendant. The pleading asks for compensation or disgorgement, punitive damages, costs and fees, and retraction and corrective advertising. Paragraph 68 alleges coordination with Check My Ads in amplifying statements. That does not establish the alleged coordination or make Check My Ads a defendant in this complaint. No later case disposition was acquired in the retained lane.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
              "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
              "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
            "sourceName": "DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.",
            "targetName": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Pleading asks compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs/fees and corrective relief. These are requested, not granted; CMA is not its named defendant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "seeks damages, retraction and corrective advertising",
            "sourceName": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "targetName": "Adalytics Research LLC",
            "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Paragraph68 alleges coordination with CMA in amplifying statements. This remains plaintiff allegation and does not establish a judicial finding, operational control or that CMA was sued in this complaint.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
                "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "alleges coordinated amplification",
            "sourceName": "DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
            "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-ford",
      "label": "Ford Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named donor in its historical approved-grant record. Exact contracting entity and payment execution beyond that listing are not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-ford",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-ford",
        "name": "Ford Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named donor in its historical approved-grant record. Exact contracting entity and payment execution beyond that listing are not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named donor in its historical approved-grant record. Exact contracting entity and payment execution beyond that listing are not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
            "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named donor in its historical approved-grant record. Exact contracting entity and payment execution beyond that listing are not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Ford reports USD200000 General Support, approvedOctober2022 for October2022–September2023. This is an approved award, not payment or support earmarked to a later2025 campaign. Financial details: value: 200,000; currency: USD; kind: approved grant; period: October2022–September2023 Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ford2022"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
                "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approved general support",
            "sourceName": "Ford Foundation",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Approval month2022-10; stated term2022-10 through2023-09; exact days unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
            "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Donor resources behind CMA capacity: Democracy Fund and Ford"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-democracy",
      "label": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "EIN38-3926408; donor-published2023/2024 Form990-PF schedules name CMA. Reader column alignment limits precise amounts, and recipient receipts were not read.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-democracy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-democracy",
        "name": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "EIN38-3926408; donor-published2023/2024 Form990-PF schedules name CMA. Reader column alignment limits precise amounts, and recipient receipts were not read.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "EIN38-3926408; donor-published2023/2024 Form990-PF schedules name CMA. Reader column alignment limits precise amounts, and recipient receipts were not read."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Democracy Fund, Inc., EIN 38-3926408, is the donor whose published 2023 and 2024 Form 990-PF schedules identify Check My Ads for general support. The retained evidence confirms the named grant relationship but does not encode precise amounts.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed general-support funder of an advocacy organisation",
        "significance": "General support contributes to an organisation's overall capacity rather than necessarily financing a particular letter, report or regulatory proposal. The donor schedules make the relationship visible, while their accounting categories and the limits of the acquired page reading constrain what can be said about payment amounts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the schedules establish",
            "text": "The donor's paid-grant schedules for both years name Check My Ads and describe general support. Reader-derived candidate amounts were not visually verified against row alignment, so they are omitted here. A separate future-payment entry in the 2023 return is not counted as another completed payment. Recipient receipts and exact payment dates were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
                "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
                "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
              "w31-fa-e-democracy2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The donor's2023 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD450000 is a reader/discovery candidate whose row alignment was not visually verified, so no precise amount is encoded. A separate future-payment entry is not a second payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-democracy2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
                "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported paid general support",
            "sourceName": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Calendar2023; individual payment date unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The donor's2024 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD250000 is a reader/discovery candidate with unverified visual row alignment; this record carries no precise amount or exact payment date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-democracy2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
                "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported paid general support",
            "sourceName": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Calendar2024; individual payment date unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
            "title": "Donor resources behind CMA capacity: Democracy Fund and Ford"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-kr",
      "label": "KR Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Danish grantmaker with published grant-specific climate/election purpose, terms and a board-governed selection structure. Funding does not establish approval of CMA publications.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-kr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-kr",
        "name": "KR Foundation",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Danish grantmaker with published grant-specific climate/election purpose, terms and a board-governed selection structure. Funding does not establish approval of CMA publications.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Danish grantmaker with published grant-specific climate/election purpose, terms and a board-governed selection structure. Funding does not establish approval of CMA publications."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
            "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "KR Foundation is a Danish grantmaker whose public records identify support for Check My Ads. Its statutes allocate award decisions to the board with defined delegation, while grant listings establish particular periods and, in one year, a stated purpose and amount.",
        "structuralRole": "Foundation support for climate and election-disinformation advocacy capacity",
        "significance": "KR's grant illustrates how a topic-specific philanthropic purpose can support an organisation that also works in other policy areas. Following the disclosed grant terms helps distinguish the funded purpose from later campaigns. Board award authority is a governance fact, rather than evidence of editorial approval over the recipient.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two grants with different disclosure depth",
            "text": "The donor-authored 2023 report lists DKK 1,991,232 for 1 May 2023–1 May 2025, aimed at cutting climate-change and election disinformation off at the source. The public 2025 list names Check My Ads for 1 April 2025–1 April 2027 but does not disclose amount or purpose; the earlier terms are not carried forward. Statutes specify distribution and signing authority. Executed award terms, payment receipts and intervention-specific approval rights were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
                "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
              "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
              "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
              "w31-fa-e-krsigning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statutes assign distribution and award decisions to KR's board, permitting defined delegation to chairmanship/executive director. No namedCMA vote or intervention-specific approval right is disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krdistribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "decides distribution, eligibility, scale and timing",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation board",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section8 identifies joint signatures or delegated authority for binding KR. No executed CMA award, editorial approval, reporting schedule or termination clause was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krsigning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation authorized joint signatories / delegates",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can bind the foundation under joint-signature rules",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation authorized joint signatories / delegates",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Donor-authored2023 report lists DKK1991232, term1May2023–1May2025, to cut climate-change and election disinformation off at the source. Not a traced allocation to the February2025 child-safety letters. Financial details: value: 1,991,232; currency: DKK; kind: reported grant; period: 1May2023–1May2025 Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-kr2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
                "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a climate/election disinformation grant",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Inclusive stated grant term, not disbursement dates; granted in2023, exact approval day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "KR's public2025 list records CMA, US,1April2025–1April2027. Amount, purpose and payment are not disclosed in this list; the2023 amount/purpose are not carried forward.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-kr2025"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "listed a later grant term",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation",
            "targetName": "Check My Ads",
            "date": "Stated grant term, not approval or payment dates."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
            "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-krboard",
      "label": "KR Foundation board",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Statutes assign grant distribution decisions and permit limited delegation. Historical first-board names are not a current roster or a reconstructed2023 vote.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-krboard",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-krboard",
        "name": "KR Foundation board",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statutes assign grant distribution decisions and permit limited delegation. Historical first-board names are not a current roster or a reconstructed2023 vote.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statutes assign grant distribution decisions and permit limited delegation. Historical first-board names are not a current roster or a reconstructed2023 vote."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Statutes assign grant distribution decisions and permit limited delegation. Historical first-board names are not a current roster or a reconstructed2023 vote.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Election of remaining directors requires a majority with no more than one dissent. Two eligible dissenting votes can block that election; ordinary decisions use a simple majority and chair casting vote. No actual vote is reconstructed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krelections"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "elects remaining directors under a dissent limit",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation board",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "VILLUM FONDEN may appoint up to two of a five-to-seven-person board; the remaining directors are board-elected. This is an appointment right, not evidence of a coordinated bloc or individual grant veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krappointments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "VILLUM FONDEN",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may appoint up to two directors",
            "sourceName": "VILLUM FONDEN",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation board",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statutes assign distribution and award decisions to KR's board, permitting defined delegation to chairmanship/executive director. No namedCMA vote or intervention-specific approval right is disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krdistribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "decides distribution, eligibility, scale and timing",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation board",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-villum",
      "label": "VILLUM FONDEN",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Statutes name an appointment right for up to two of KR Foundation's five-to-seven directors. No individual grant veto or donor-to-CMA editorial instruction inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-villum",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-villum",
        "name": "VILLUM FONDEN",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statutes name an appointment right for up to two of KR Foundation's five-to-seven directors. No individual grant veto or donor-to-CMA editorial instruction inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statutes name an appointment right for up to two of KR Foundation's five-to-seven directors. No individual grant veto or donor-to-CMA editorial instruction inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Statutes name an appointment right for up to two of KR Foundation's five-to-seven directors. No individual grant veto or donor-to-CMA editorial instruction inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "VILLUM FONDEN may appoint up to two of a five-to-seven-person board; the remaining directors are board-elected. This is an appointment right, not evidence of a coordinated bloc or individual grant veto.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krappointments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may appoint up to two directors",
            "sourceName": "VILLUM FONDEN",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation board",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix",
            "heading": "What the funder says it is building",
            "text": "Sections1and4 identify VILLUM FONDEN and descendants of Villum Kann Rasmussen as founders and a DKK10million initial cash capital, with no return of that initial capital to founders. No present grant is traced to a particular upstream transfer, and no wider family, company or state financing claim is made. The original first-board names in the statutes are historical, not today's board. Current bios were read only as context and are not used to retroactively assign the2023grant vote.",
            "matched": [
              "VILLUM FONDEN"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "72ba1076b8a4ab97355ecaa8d0697137fd538fb3dbe5de6ea8e68022416a991d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-krsign",
      "label": "KR Foundation authorized joint signatories / delegates",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Statutory signing authority can bind the foundation. The document does not identify signatories to any particular CMA award.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-krsign",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-krsign",
        "name": "KR Foundation authorized joint signatories / delegates",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statutory signing authority can bind the foundation. The document does not identify signatories to any particular CMA award.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statutory signing authority can bind the foundation. The document does not identify signatories to any particular CMA award."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Statutory signing authority can bind the foundation. The document does not identify signatories to any particular CMA award.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section8 identifies joint signatures or delegated authority for binding KR. No executed CMA award, editorial approval, reporting schedule or termination clause was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-krsigning"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
                "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "KR Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can bind the foundation under joint-signature rules",
            "sourceName": "KR Foundation authorized joint signatories / delegates",
            "targetName": "KR Foundation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-mix2024",
      "label": "CMA reported funding mix — 2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Annual chart: major donors59, foundations30, individuals11, without explicit percent sign, dollar denominator or accounting basis. Separate individual-donor chart is not share of total funding.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-mix2024",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-mix2024",
        "name": "CMA reported funding mix — 2024",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Annual chart: major donors59, foundations30, individuals11, without explicit percent sign, dollar denominator or accounting basis. Separate individual-donor chart is not share of total funding.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Annual chart: major donors59, foundations30, individuals11, without explicit percent sign, dollar denominator or accounting basis. Separate individual-donor chart is not share of total funding."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Annual chart: major donors59, foundations30, individuals11, without explicit percent sign, dollar denominator or accounting basis. Separate individual-donor chart is not share of total funding.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CMA's2024 graphic labels major donors59, foundations30 and individuals11. These chart values have no explicit percent sign or dollar denominator; 490 recurring donors and the separate Checkmates60/one-time40 chart are distinct measures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-mix2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a funding-source chart",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "CMA reported funding mix — 2024",
            "date": "Report period2024; publication pathFebruary2025 is not the accounting period."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-mix2025",
      "label": "CMA reported funding mix — 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Annual report explicitly gives foundations82.8%, major donors12.3%, individuals4.9%; dollar totals, definitions and accounting basis not supplied. Changes do not identify cause or each donor.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-mix2025",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-mix2025",
        "name": "CMA reported funding mix — 2025",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Annual report explicitly gives foundations82.8%, major donors12.3%, individuals4.9%; dollar totals, definitions and accounting basis not supplied. Changes do not identify cause or each donor.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Annual report explicitly gives foundations82.8%, major donors12.3%, individuals4.9%; dollar totals, definitions and accounting basis not supplied. Changes do not identify cause or each donor."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Annual report explicitly gives foundations82.8%, major donors12.3%, individuals4.9%; dollar totals, definitions and accounting basis not supplied. Changes do not identify cause or each donor.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CMA's2025 chart explicitly reports foundation grants82.8%, major donors12.3% and individuals4.9%, with four new institutional donors and three multiyear renewals. No absolute revenue or causal explanation for the shift is supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-mix2025"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported foundation grants as 82.8 percent",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "CMA reported funding mix — 2025",
            "date": "Report period2025; URL path containsApril2026, not an independently established publication date."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
            "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
      "label": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Historical annual-report board; founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi are co-chairs. Roster is not proof of donor appointment, internal voting rules or current office.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
        "name": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Historical annual-report board; founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi are co-chairs. Roster is not proof of donor appointment, internal voting rules or current office.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Historical annual-report board; founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi are co-chairs. Roster is not proof of donor appointment, internal voting rules or current office."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Historical annual-report board; founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi are co-chairs. Roster is not proof of donor appointment, internal voting rules or current office.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-atkincochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Claire Atkin",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was listed as co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Claire Atkin",
            "targetName": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
            "date": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The2024 annual report names a board and co-chairs; it supplies no donor appointment/veto mechanism or current-office guarantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-boardroster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "published a historical board roster",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
            "date": "2024 annual-report context; precise tenure intervals unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-atkin",
      "label": "Claire Atkin",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CMA founder and co-chair in its2024 annual report; no later office or donor appointment inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-atkin",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-atkin",
        "name": "Claire Atkin",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "CMA founder and co-chair in its2024 annual report; no later office or donor appointment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CMA founder and co-chair in its2024 annual report; no later office or donor appointment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Claire Atkin is identified as a Check My Ads founder and board co-chair in the organisation's 2024 annual report. This profile records that dated leadership role rather than assuming a later office or tenure.",
        "structuralRole": "Founder participating in organisational board leadership",
        "significance": "The co-chair role locates formal internal leadership behind Check My Ads' public advocacy. It connects the organisation's origins to its reported board structure, while leaving donor appointment rights, particular votes and responsibility for individual publications to more specific records.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported position",
            "text": "The visibly readable board page names Atkin and Nandini Jammi as co-chairs alongside four other board members. It separately lists an operating team, including a chief operating officer and policy director. The report is an organisational account of roles; it does not establish a voting agreement, tax-law independence status or a donor-conferred seat.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-atkincochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-atkincochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was listed as co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Claire Atkin",
            "targetName": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
            "date": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap",
            "heading": "What the organization discloses",
            "text": "PDF25 names founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi as board co-chairs, alongside Zach Edwards, Sabrina Hersi Issa, David Carroll and Dr. Joan Donovan. The team includes Arielle Garcia as COO and Sarah K. Wiley as director of policy. This is a historical organizational roster, not proof of current offices, independent directors under tax definitions, donor appointment rights or a voting agreement. PDF25 is visibly readable; the extracted text truncates several names and titles, so the visual takes precedence.",
            "matched": [
              "Claire Atkin",
              "Atkin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "da9e2e74ab1dacbee99194037ddcfbfdff7ac979124980c93153f986a8b27fc0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-jammi",
      "label": "Nandini Jammi",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CMA founder and co-chair in its2024 annual report; no later office or donor appointment inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Person"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-jammi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-jammi",
        "name": "Nandini Jammi",
        "role": "Person",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "CMA founder and co-chair in its2024 annual report; no later office or donor appointment inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CMA founder and co-chair in its2024 annual report; no later office or donor appointment inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nandini Jammi is identified as a Check My Ads founder and board co-chair in its 2024 annual report. The evidence establishes a historical organisational leadership position, without extending it automatically into the present.",
        "structuralRole": "Founder holding a reported board-leadership role",
        "significance": "Jammi's co-chair position connects the advocacy organisation to a named internal decision-making structure. This helps distinguish its own governance from relationships with funders, researchers or public officials. A disclosed grant or consultation connection does not itself identify who instructed a particular organisational action.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The annual-report record",
            "text": "The board page names Jammi and fellow founder Claire Atkin as co-chairs, with Zach Edwards, Sabrina Hersi Issa, David Carroll and Joan Donovan also listed. The research used the visibly readable page where text extraction truncated names. The roster provides no donor appointment power, individual voting record or evidence of unchanged later tenure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-jammicochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-jammicochair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
                "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was listed as co-chair",
            "sourceName": "Nandini Jammi",
            "targetName": "CMA board — 2024 reported roster",
            "date": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap",
            "heading": "What the organization discloses",
            "text": "PDF25 names founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi as board co-chairs, alongside Zach Edwards, Sabrina Hersi Issa, David Carroll and Dr. Joan Donovan. The team includes Arielle Garcia as COO and Sarah K. Wiley as director of policy. This is a historical organizational roster, not proof of current offices, independent directors under tax definitions, donor appointment rights or a voting agreement. PDF25 is visibly readable; the extracted text truncates several names and titles, so the visual takes precedence.",
            "matched": [
              "Nandini Jammi",
              "Jammi"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "da9e2e74ab1dacbee99194037ddcfbfdff7ac979124980c93153f986a8b27fc0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
            "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "label": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "A31-page Ofcom-hosted response, listed11December2025; exact submission date unestablished. It asks for monetization-related checks and sanctions, not universal viewer identification.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-cmasub",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "name": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A31-page Ofcom-hosted response, listed11December2025; exact submission date unestablished. It asks for monetization-related checks and sanctions, not universal viewer identification.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "A31-page Ofcom-hosted response, listed11December2025; exact submission date unestablished. It asks for monetization-related checks and sanctions, not universal viewer identification."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Check My Ads Institute's thirty-one-page response to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures consultation proposes changes to online monetisation, identity checks and sanctions. Ofcom's listing is dated 11 December 2025; the exact submission date was not independently established.",
        "structuralRole": "Advocacy proposal targeting the financial incentives of online services",
        "significance": "The response connects safety regulation to the revenue mechanisms of platforms, creators and advertisers. It asks for checks and sanctions at monetisation stages, where services already make commercial decisions. This is a proposed expansion of operational responsibility, rather than a universal viewer-identification requirement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Specific requested mechanisms",
            "text": "The response proposes know-your-customer or business-customer checks for creators and advertisers, including payment and location signals and repeat-violator detection. It seeks provider-system or manual clearance for monetisation when risk indicators suggest illegal content, without making a court ruling the trigger. Requested measures include return prevention for specified offenders, permanent bans for repeat illegal monetisers, advertiser clawbacks and crisis-related revenue information or refunds where possible. Publication establishes the proposal's presence in the consultation; the retained roadmap does not resolve adoption of every recommendation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
              "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
              "w31-fa-e-checks",
              "w31-fa-e-clearance",
              "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
              "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
              "w31-fa-e-adincident",
              "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The current scoped roadmap forecasts remaining decisions, while the crisis decision is already published. Neither the forecast nor the September9 issued-code index resolves all CMA proposals or crisis commencement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "forecast remaining additional-measures decisions for autumn2026",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "date": "Roadmapupdated2026-07-28;indexupdated2026-09-09."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA requests return prevention for specified adultCSAM offenders, permanent bans of repeat illegal monetizers and advertiser clawbacks. Account access and revenue sanctions are distinct; implementation unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Monetizer return bans and financial sanctions — CMA proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested return bans, repeat-violator sanctions and clawbacks",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Monetizer return bans and financial sanctions — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "KYC/KYBC proposals cover creators and advertisers, payment/location signals and repeat violators. No universal viewer-ID rule, prescribed identity document or technical identity database is specified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-checks"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Creator / advertiser verification — CMA proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested verification of creators and advertisers",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Creator / advertiser verification — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA asked for reporting to Ofcom/advertisers and associated refunds, using harmful/unsafe-ad terminology as well as illegality. It did not establish the reported incidents independently.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-adincident"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Harmful-ad incident reporting — CMA proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested advertising incident reporting without a minimum threshold",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Harmful-ad incident reporting — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA would require a monetization decision where risk indicators suggest illegal content, with clearance by provider systems/manual review; a court ruling is not the proposed trigger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-clearance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pre-monetization risk clearance — CMA proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested withholding monetization pending platform assessment",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Pre-monetization risk clearance — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA asked Ofcom to address monetization incentives, verification and sanctions. Receipt/publication does not establish adoption of each recommendation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted proposals for additional safety measures",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA proposed crisis revenue information, monetization changes and refunds where possible, not a guarantee of reimbursement in every case.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-crisismoney"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested crisis monetization controls and conditional refunds",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom hosts CMA's31-page additional-safety response. The11December2025 listing date is not an independently established submission date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-cmapublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Check My Ads",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provided a consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Check My Ads",
            "targetName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "date": "2025 consultation; exact submission day unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
      "label": "Creator / advertiser verification — CMA proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Proposed KYC/KYBC for creators and advertisers concerns monetized participation. No specified identity document, shared database or universal viewer check; other dispositions unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-creatorchecks",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
        "name": "Creator / advertiser verification — CMA proposal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Proposed KYC/KYBC for creators and advertisers concerns monetized participation. No specified identity document, shared database or universal viewer check; other dispositions unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposed KYC/KYBC for creators and advertisers concerns monetized participation. No specified identity document, shared database or universal viewer check; other dispositions unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Proposed KYC/KYBC for creators and advertisers concerns monetized participation. No specified identity document, shared database or universal viewer check; other dispositions unverified.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "KYC/KYBC proposals cover creators and advertisers, payment/location signals and repeat violators. No universal viewer-ID rule, prescribed identity document or technical identity database is specified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-checks"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested verification of creators and advertisers",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Creator / advertiser verification — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-premonetization",
      "label": "Pre-monetization risk clearance — CMA proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "CMA proposes withholding monetization for indications of illegal-content risk until platform assessment clears it, including manual review of possible illegality. This is not a prior court-finding requirement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-premonetization",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-premonetization",
        "name": "Pre-monetization risk clearance — CMA proposal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "CMA proposes withholding monetization for indications of illegal-content risk until platform assessment clears it, including manual review of possible illegality. This is not a prior court-finding requirement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CMA proposes withholding monetization for indications of illegal-content risk until platform assessment clears it, including manual review of possible illegality. This is not a prior court-finding requirement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CMA proposes withholding monetization for indications of illegal-content risk until platform assessment clears it, including manual review of possible illegality. This is not a prior court-finding requirement.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA would require a monetization decision where risk indicators suggest illegal content, with clearance by provider systems/manual review; a court ruling is not the proposed trigger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-clearance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested withholding monetization pending platform assessment",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Pre-monetization risk clearance — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-sanctions",
      "label": "Monetizer return bans and financial sanctions — CMA proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Proposed specified-offender/repeat-violator bans, advertiser clawbacks and related sanctions. These remain requested measures; actual closure, refund and adoption are unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-sanctions",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-sanctions",
        "name": "Monetizer return bans and financial sanctions — CMA proposal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Proposed specified-offender/repeat-violator bans, advertiser clawbacks and related sanctions. These remain requested measures; actual closure, refund and adoption are unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Proposed specified-offender/repeat-violator bans, advertiser clawbacks and related sanctions. These remain requested measures; actual closure, refund and adoption are unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Proposed specified-offender/repeat-violator bans, advertiser clawbacks and related sanctions. These remain requested measures; actual closure, refund and adoption are unverified.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA requests return prevention for specified adultCSAM offenders, permanent bans of repeat illegal monetizers and advertiser clawbacks. Account access and revenue sanctions are distinct; implementation unverified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested return bans, repeat-violator sanctions and clawbacks",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Monetizer return bans and financial sanctions — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
      "label": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Requested crisis monetization changes, revenue information and advertiser refunds where possible. Ofcom expressly declined recommending specific monetization practices in this crisis measure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-crisis-money",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
        "name": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Requested crisis monetization changes, revenue information and advertiser refunds where possible. Ofcom expressly declined recommending specific monetization practices in this crisis measure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Requested crisis monetization changes, revenue information and advertiser refunds where possible. Ofcom expressly declined recommending specific monetization practices in this crisis measure."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Requested crisis monetization changes, revenue information and advertiser refunds where possible. Ofcom expressly declined recommending specific monetization practices in this crisis measure.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom explicitly records CMA's revenue/refund request and declines to recommend specific monetization practices for the crisis protocol. Providers retain proportionate advertising-integrity choices; this does not decide CMA's other proposals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined to recommend specific monetization practices",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA proposed crisis revenue information, monetization changes and refunds where possible, not a guarantee of reimbursement in every case.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-crisismoney"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested crisis monetization controls and conditional refunds",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Crisis revenue accounting and refunds — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-adincident",
      "label": "Harmful-ad incident reporting — CMA proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "CMA asks for advertising incident reporting to Ofcom and advertisers without a minimum threshold, using harmful/unsafe language broader than established illegality. No implemented reporting channel established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-adincident",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-adincident",
        "name": "Harmful-ad incident reporting — CMA proposal",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "CMA asks for advertising incident reporting to Ofcom and advertisers without a minimum threshold, using harmful/unsafe language broader than established illegality. No implemented reporting channel established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CMA asks for advertising incident reporting to Ofcom and advertisers without a minimum threshold, using harmful/unsafe language broader than established illegality. No implemented reporting channel established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CMA asks for advertising incident reporting to Ofcom and advertisers without a minimum threshold, using harmful/unsafe language broader than established illegality. No implemented reporting channel established.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CMA asked for reporting to Ofcom/advertisers and associated refunds, using harmful/unsafe-ad terminology as well as illegality. It did not establish the reported incidents independently.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-adincident"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested advertising incident reporting without a minimum threshold",
            "sourceName": "CMA additional-safety response — 2025",
            "targetName": "Harmful-ad incident reporting — CMA proposal",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
            "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-fullfact",
      "label": "Full Fact",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Consultation respondent seeking broader crisis scope, stronger supervision and meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers; proposals and Ofcom-attributed input are distinct from granted authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-fullfact",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-fullfact",
        "name": "Full Fact",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Consultation respondent seeking broader crisis scope, stronger supervision and meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers; proposals and Ofcom-attributed input are distinct from granted authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Consultation respondent seeking broader crisis scope, stronger supervision and meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers; proposals and Ofcom-attributed input are distinct from granted authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Consultation respondent seeking broader crisis scope, stronger supervision and meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers; proposals and Ofcom-attributed input are distinct from granted authority.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Full Fact's response is dated17October2025 on PDF20 and later listed11December. The response cannot establish its participation in the earlier August meeting.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffpublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a dated consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact",
            "targetName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference",
            "heading": "What can be joined to Ofcom's drafting change",
            "text": "The accepted root operational note records Ofcom's statement 3.46–47/footnote29, PDF17, identifying Full Fact's response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on 4 August 2025 as inputs to questions about the interaction. Ofcom's resulting amendment says providers should consider an Ofcom public statement notice alongside their other indicators.",
            "matched": [
              "Full Fact"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5c0ba1df0a603025deb5199ed53ff56c77310dcb996946f5eeffa780f6c0d89b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference",
            "heading": "Surrounding authority and safeguards",
            "text": "These are proposed process safeguards, not evidence that an affected user's post or account would be restored or that a particular appeal succeeded. Full Fact's proportionality argument also criticizes a focus on minimizing provider costs and asks that the severity of harms be weighed (paragraphs86–90, PDF20). Its argument combines stronger intervention with accountability; either half alone would misrepresent the response.",
            "matched": [
              "Full Fact"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1293f87cb8122cb85be659de35eeb5b147818e843078cac89cbb7b9d462568dd"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
            "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld",
            "heading": "Custody, access and reading extent",
            "text": "The Companies House overview, PUBLIC privacy identity section, Full Fact Chapter 3/footnotes and official FOI inventory were read through the public web reader. Their original response bytes were not retained in this lane. No hashes are claimed for those web-reader-only scopes.",
            "matched": [
              "Full Fact"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a63595697991adedf68c03132b50554f925eb3358c6ec628a9ff613d9e28e69a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Policy travels through documents and decisions",
            "text": "Full Fact offers unusually precise evidence of input and institutional response. Ofcom attributes a notice-indicator amendment to its submission and questions from an earlier DSIT meeting. A notice becomes an indicator to consider; the provider retains its criteria-based crisis determination. The record supports a specific contribution while leaving the meeting's underlying records and other decisions unacquired. Influence is visible without assuming wholesale control. A8",
            "matched": [
              "Full Fact"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9fb5176fedea1b04de7c4aeb09a5f2b50019feb57e19a921124de6bf9b99b66f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "label": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Dated20-page response; official-reader text has four marked line omissions. Ofcom later cited itsp17 alongside an earlier DSIT meeting. No Full Fact participation in that meeting inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-ffsub",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "name": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Dated20-page response; official-reader text has four marked line omissions. Ofcom later cited itsp17 alongside an earlier DSIT meeting. No Full Fact participation in that meeting inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Dated20-page response; official-reader text has four marked line omissions. Ofcom later cited itsp17 alongside an earlier DSIT meeting. No Full Fact participation in that meeting inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Full Fact's twenty-page submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures consultation is dated 17 October 2025. It seeks broader crisis scope, coordination, oversight and data access while presenting expression and proportionality arguments.",
        "structuralRole": "Civil-society proposal with a regulator-attributed contribution to later wording",
        "significance": "The submission connects fact-checking expertise and institutional interests to the design of crisis-response obligations. Ofcom later identified part of it as an input to a drafting change, giving a concrete contribution link. That attribution is narrower than adopting Full Fact's entire proposal or granting its requested access.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Requests and recorded response",
            "text": "Full Fact seeks evidence, severity and transparent criteria, aligns some scope language with section 175's health and national-security terms, and requests logs, notifications and oversight. It expressly recognises that Ofcom cannot mandate platform partnerships with fact-checkers while seeking meaningful data access. Ofcom's June 2026 statement cites page 17 alongside questions from an earlier DSIT meeting when explaining a ministerial-notice amendment. Full Fact's later response does not establish its attendance at that meeting.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
              "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
              "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
              "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
              "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
              "w31-fa-e-ffinput"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph76 aligns scope with s175 health/national-security language; paragraphs77–79 seek evidence/severity/transparent criteria. Separate systemic-misinformation legislative review is acknowledged as beyond this consultation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Broader crisis scope / systemic misinformation — Full Fact requests",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested broader crisis and legislative scope",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Broader crisis scope / systemic misinformation — Full Fact requests",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Full Fact explicitly recognizes that Ofcom cannot mandate platform fact-checker partnerships, then seeks meaningful data access and consequences for failure. A requested institutional benefit is not an actual entitlement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffaccess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accredited fact-checker data access — Full Fact request",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested meaningful access for accredited fact-checkers",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Accredited fact-checker data access — Full Fact request",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Requests include Ofcom coordination, notifications, evidence logs, oversight, public summaries and regular submission of analyses. Requested safeguards do not establish an executed return/appeal process.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffoversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Central coordination, records and public summaries — Full Fact requests",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested coordination and stronger accountability",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Central coordination, records and public summaries — Full Fact requests",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Full Fact requested broader scope, coordination, oversight and access, with expression and proportionality arguments. Publication and citation are not a grant of those powers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made consultation requests",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Full Fact's response is dated17October2025 on PDF20 and later listed11December. The response cannot establish its participation in the earlier August meeting.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffpublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Full Fact",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published a dated consultation response",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact",
            "targetName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and earlier DSIT-meeting questions. This establishes regulator-attributed contribution, not exclusive authorship or verbatim adoption of Full Fact's scope language.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffinput"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was cited as an input to a recommendation amendment",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-ffscope",
      "label": "Broader crisis scope / systemic misinformation — Full Fact requests",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Requests align crisis scope with s175 health/national-security language, propose transparent criteria and systemic-harm legislative review. It does not expressly demand an automatic ministerial activation switch.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-ffscope",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-ffscope",
        "name": "Broader crisis scope / systemic misinformation — Full Fact requests",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Requests align crisis scope with s175 health/national-security language, propose transparent criteria and systemic-harm legislative review. It does not expressly demand an automatic ministerial activation switch.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Requests align crisis scope with s175 health/national-security language, propose transparent criteria and systemic-harm legislative review. It does not expressly demand an automatic ministerial activation switch."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Requests align crisis scope with s175 health/national-security language, propose transparent criteria and systemic-harm legislative review. It does not expressly demand an automatic ministerial activation switch.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph76 aligns scope with s175 health/national-security language; paragraphs77–79 seek evidence/severity/transparent criteria. Separate systemic-misinformation legislative review is acknowledged as beyond this consultation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested broader crisis and legislative scope",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Broader crisis scope / systemic misinformation — Full Fact requests",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-ffaccess",
      "label": "Accredited fact-checker data access — Full Fact request",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate provider partnerships, while requesting meaningful data access and consequences for failure to share. This could benefit its institutional category; no entitlement or appointment.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-ffaccess",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-ffaccess",
        "name": "Accredited fact-checker data access — Full Fact request",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate provider partnerships, while requesting meaningful data access and consequences for failure to share. This could benefit its institutional category; no entitlement or appointment.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate provider partnerships, while requesting meaningful data access and consequences for failure to share. This could benefit its institutional category; no entitlement or appointment."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate provider partnerships, while requesting meaningful data access and consequences for failure to share. This could benefit its institutional category; no entitlement or appointment.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Full Fact explicitly recognizes that Ofcom cannot mandate platform fact-checker partnerships, then seeks meaningful data access and consequences for failure. A requested institutional benefit is not an actual entitlement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffaccess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested meaningful access for accredited fact-checkers",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Accredited fact-checker data access — Full Fact request",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-ffoversight",
      "label": "Central coordination, records and public summaries — Full Fact requests",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Requests Ofcom coordination, government/police/civil channels, start/end notices, evidence logs, stronger oversight and routine analyses/public summaries, with safeguards. Regulator adopted only selected elements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-ffoversight",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-ffoversight",
        "name": "Central coordination, records and public summaries — Full Fact requests",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Requests Ofcom coordination, government/police/civil channels, start/end notices, evidence logs, stronger oversight and routine analyses/public summaries, with safeguards. Regulator adopted only selected elements.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Requests Ofcom coordination, government/police/civil channels, start/end notices, evidence logs, stronger oversight and routine analyses/public summaries, with safeguards. Regulator adopted only selected elements."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Requests Ofcom coordination, government/police/civil channels, start/end notices, evidence logs, stronger oversight and routine analyses/public summaries, with safeguards. Regulator adopted only selected elements.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Requests include Ofcom coordination, notifications, evidence logs, oversight, public summaries and regular submission of analyses. Requested safeguards do not establish an executed return/appeal process.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffoversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested coordination and stronger accountability",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Central coordination, records and public summaries — Full Fact requests",
            "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-noticechange",
      "label": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "June2026 statement says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and questions at an Ofcom/DSIT meeting4August2025. Specific contribution shares, drafting authorship and underlying minute remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-noticechange",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-noticechange",
        "name": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "June2026 statement says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and questions at an Ofcom/DSIT meeting4August2025. Specific contribution shares, drafting authorship and underlying minute remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "June2026 statement says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and questions at an Ofcom/DSIT meeting4August2025. Specific contribution shares, drafting authorship and underlying minute remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This subject is Ofcom's attributed June 2026 amendment requiring a ministerial public-statement notice to be considered among a provider's crisis indicators. Ofcom links the change to Full Fact's response and earlier questions at a DSIT meeting.",
        "structuralRole": "Documented contribution route from consultation and departmental engagement to wording",
        "significance": "The record provides an unusually specific influence link: the regulator itself names two inputs when explaining a change. It supports a contribution claim while leaving the relative contribution, precise questions and drafting ownership unresolved. The resulting provision still leaves the crisis determination with the provider.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Attribution and effect",
            "text": "Ofcom's statement identifies Full Fact's page 17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on 4 August 2025. Full Fact's response was dated later, on 17 October. The amended recommendation treats a notice alongside other indicators; it is not an automatic crisis switch or a transfer of provider judgement to either stakeholder. The meeting minutes and underlying wording proposals were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
              "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
              "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom's attributed amendment requires considering the notice alongside other indicators. It does not transfer the provider's crisis determination wholesale to Full Fact, DSIT or the Secretary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "added consideration of a ministerial-notice indicator",
            "sourceName": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and earlier DSIT-meeting questions. This establishes regulator-attributed contribution, not exclusive authorship or verbatim adoption of Full Fact's scope language.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ffinput"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was cited as an input to a recommendation amendment",
            "sourceName": "Full Fact additional-safety response — 17 October 2025",
            "targetName": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom cites questions at a4August2025 meeting with DSIT alongside Full Fact's later response. No minute supplies the question text, attendees or allocated drafting role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-meetinginput"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting — 4 August 2025",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was cited as another input to the amendment",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting — 4 August 2025",
            "targetName": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "date": "Meeting4August2025; attribution in June2026 statement."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
      "label": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting — 4 August 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Existence/date and questions are attributed by Ofcom's statement footnote29. Attendees, agenda, content, initiation and approval rights are not established by a minute.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
        "name": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting — 4 August 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Existence/date and questions are attributed by Ofcom's statement footnote29. Attendees, agenda, content, initiation and approval rights are not established by a minute.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Existence/date and questions are attributed by Ofcom's statement footnote29. Attendees, agenda, content, initiation and approval rights are not established by a minute."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Existence/date and questions are attributed by Ofcom's statement footnote29. Attendees, agenda, content, initiation and approval rights are not established by a minute.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom cites questions at a4August2025 meeting with DSIT alongside Full Fact's later response. No minute supplies the question text, attendees or allocated drafting role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-meetinginput"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was cited as another input to the amendment",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting — 4 August 2025",
            "targetName": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "date": "Meeting4August2025; attribution in June2026 statement."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The regulator's published footnote identifies a4August2025 meeting; that record does not establish Full Fact attendance or initiation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a meeting with DSIT",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting — 4 August 2025",
            "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "label": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Published statement and laid children-code draft are distinct stages. Provider decision criteria, channels and records are specified; final crisis-code commencement is unresolved in records.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-protocol",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "name": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Published statement and laid children-code draft are distinct stages. Provider decision criteria, channels and records are specified; final crisis-code commencement is unresolved in records.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Published statement and laid children-code draft are distinct stages. Provider decision criteria, channels and records are specified; final crisis-code commencement is unresolved in records."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ofcom's 9 June 2026 crisis-response statement sets out a framework for in-scope providers responding to serious UK public-safety risks involving relevant illegal or child-harm content. The statement, laid draft code and eventual commencement are separate legal stages.",
        "structuralRole": "Regulatory framework locating crisis decisions and safeguards within providers",
        "significance": "The framework channels external signals into a provider's own crisis assessment, team and systems. It creates some formal links, especially with police for large services, while declining several proposed coordination and access obligations. Those choices determine which outside actors obtain a defined operational route and which remain advisory.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Decisions, channels and limits",
            "text": "Providers determine whether criteria are met and act as soon as reasonably practicable, considering a section 175 notice alongside other indicators. Large in-scope services should offer a dedicated law-enforcement channel. Ofcom declined to extend formal contact obligations to NGOs, impose central cross-service coordination or require automatic submission and publication of every post-crisis analysis. Existing moderation, reporting, appeal, privacy and expression protections remain. The retained sources do not resolve final crisis-code commencement or establish a current activation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              },
              {
                "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
              "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
              "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
              "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
              "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
              "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
              "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
              "w31-fa-e-retainappeals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Providers use seriousUK-public-safety and relevant illegal/child-harm content indicators to determine a crisis, including linked overseas/local events. The framework is not a free-standing general misinformation intervention power.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends criteria-based crisis processes",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Existing moderation/reporting/appeal, privacy and expression protections remain; no free-standing universal crisis appeal is created. Accuracy safeguards coexist with acknowledged possible false positives.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-retainappeals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Existing moderation appeals, expression and privacy safeguards",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains existing appeal, expression and privacy safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "targetName": "Existing moderation appeals, expression and privacy safeguards",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Large in-scope services should provide a dedicated law-enforcement channel after their own crisis determination. Smaller high-risk protocol scope does not automatically carry this channel requirement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-policechannel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends a dedicated channel for large services",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "targetName": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The provider determines a crisis and chooses systems; action is as soon as reasonably practicable. A ministerial public statement notice is considered alongside indicators, not an automatic switch.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-providerdecision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "determines activation using relevant criteria",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom's attributed amendment requires considering the notice alongside other indicators. It does not transfer the provider's crisis determination wholesale to Full Fact, DSIT or the Secretary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "added consideration of a ministerial-notice indicator",
            "sourceName": "Ministerial-notice indicator — Ofcom-attributed change",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
            "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-providers",
      "label": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "A regulated-provider role, not identified deployed systems. Scope and size matter: smaller high-risk services may be in protocol scope while dedicated police-channel scope is for large services.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-providers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-providers",
        "name": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
        "role": "Audience",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A regulated-provider role, not identified deployed systems. Scope and size matter: smaller high-risk services may be in protocol scope while dedicated police-channel scope is for large services.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "A regulated-provider role, not identified deployed systems. Scope and size matter: smaller high-risk services may be in protocol scope while dedicated police-channel scope is for large services."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "These are the service providers within Ofcom's crisis-measure scope, represented as a regulated role rather than identified deployments. Service size and risk affect the recommended obligations, including whether a dedicated police channel is required.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational decision-makers applying crisis criteria to their own services",
        "significance": "Providers connect incoming government, civil-society and internal information to actual system changes. The framework places the crisis determination and team selection inside the provider, even where formal notices must be considered. That makes the particular implementation important to assessing who acts and what is changed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Inputs, teams and duration",
            "text": "The statement permits internal and external signals, including NGO information without trusted-flagger status. Providers select a senior cross-functional team and choose their response systems. Large-service police channels facilitate incoming crisis information without replacing ordinary legal processes for routine data requests. The recommended protocol ends when criteria cease or at ninety days, whichever is sooner, followed by analysis and records. Continuing risks return to ordinary operations; ninety days is not a promise to restore all restricted content.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-inputs",
              "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
              "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
              "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
              "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Providers use seriousUK-public-safety and relevant illegal/child-harm content indicators to determine a crisis, including linked overseas/local events. The framework is not a free-standing general misinformation intervention power.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends criteria-based crisis processes",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Under s175(5), Ofcom may use the public statement notice or a subsequent notice to require information needed to respond to the threat. Actual information demanded and ensuing provider behavior remain unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-information"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may require threat-response information",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The provider determines a crisis and chooses systems; action is as soon as reasonably practicable. A ministerial public statement notice is considered alongside indicators, not an automatic switch.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-providerdecision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "determines activation using relevant criteria",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The statement recommends ending the protocol when criteria end or at90days, sooner, then analysis/records. Continuing risks shift to ordinary operations; this is not a90-day restoration promise.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would retain post-crisis analysis and key records",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The recommendation places operational coordination inside a provider-selected senior cross-functional team; no public appointment of a named NGO or government officer into it is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-teamselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider senior cross-functional crisis team",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Provider senior cross-functional crisis team",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The channel is for fast crisis information into large services. Existing legal processes for routine data requests remain; Ofcom disclaims general power here to compel disclosure to police.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-channeloperation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would operate a conditional incoming-information channel",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "External and internal signals can inform the provider, including NGOs without trusted-flagger status. No named NGO is selected, and no indicator automatically activates a crisis.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-inputs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "External and internal crisis indicators",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may inform a provider determination",
            "sourceName": "External and internal crisis indicators",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "A public statement notice requires the provider to describe steps taken in response to the threat by the specified date; publication is not itself a takedown command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-publicaccount"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can require a public statement by a specified date",
            "sourceName": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-indicators",
      "label": "External and internal crisis indicators",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Examples include police/intelligence, NGOs, contingency bodies, news, other services, trusted flaggers and internal reports. These are possible inputs, not a named actor's automatic trigger or a shared compulsory database.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-indicators",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-indicators",
        "name": "External and internal crisis indicators",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Examples include police/intelligence, NGOs, contingency bodies, news, other services, trusted flaggers and internal reports. These are possible inputs, not a named actor's automatic trigger or a shared compulsory database.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Examples include police/intelligence, NGOs, contingency bodies, news, other services, trusted flaggers and internal reports. These are possible inputs, not a named actor's automatic trigger or a shared compulsory database."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Examples include police/intelligence, NGOs, contingency bodies, news, other services, trusted flaggers and internal reports. These are possible inputs, not a named actor's automatic trigger or a shared compulsory database.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "External and internal signals can inform the provider, including NGOs without trusted-flagger status. No named NGO is selected, and no indicator automatically activates a crisis.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-inputs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may inform a provider determination",
            "sourceName": "External and internal crisis indicators",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-team",
      "label": "Provider senior cross-functional crisis team",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The recommendation places a sufficiently senior cross-functional team inside the provider's process. Actual people, delegated limits and a deployment are not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-team",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-team",
        "name": "Provider senior cross-functional crisis team",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The recommendation places a sufficiently senior cross-functional team inside the provider's process. Actual people, delegated limits and a deployment are not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The recommendation places a sufficiently senior cross-functional team inside the provider's process. Actual people, delegated limits and a deployment are not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The recommendation places a sufficiently senior cross-functional team inside the provider's process. Actual people, delegated limits and a deployment are not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The recommendation places operational coordination inside a provider-selected senior cross-functional team; no public appointment of a named NGO or government officer into it is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-teamselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Provider senior cross-functional crisis team",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-secretary",
      "label": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Enacted statutory role for directions on reasonable grounds of public-health/safety or national-security threat. Not a named minister, direct lawful-content takedown right or independently verified current commencement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-secretary",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-secretary",
        "name": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Enacted statutory role for directions on reasonable grounds of public-health/safety or national-security threat. Not a named minister, direct lawful-content takedown right or independently verified current commencement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Enacted statutory role for directions on reasonable grounds of public-health/safety or national-security threat. Not a named minister, direct lawful-content takedown right or independently verified current commencement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the Secretary of State's statutory role under section 175 of the Online Safety Act 2023. On the specified reasonable grounds concerning public health, safety or national security, the role can direct Ofcom's media-literacy priorities or require a public-statement notice.",
        "structuralRole": "Ministerial trigger for specified Ofcom accounting and literacy functions",
        "significance": "The provision places a government input upstream of Ofcom and providers during a threat response. Its scope is defined by the particular statutory routes rather than a general power to order removal of lawful content. The distinction matters when a public-statement notice later becomes one indicator in a provider's crisis assessment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Directions and revision",
            "text": "Subsection 2 concerns media-literacy priorities; subsections 1 and 3 concern directions for public-statement notices to specified providers or generally. Subsection 6 requires publication of reasons for public-health or safety directions, without the same requirement for national-security grounds in that subsection. Directions may be varied or revoked, with consequential notice changes by Ofcom. The enacted text establishes the role; no particular exercised direction, revocation or automatic restoration outcome was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
              "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
              "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
              "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "On reasonable grounds for the specified public-health/safety or national-security threat, enacted s175(2) permits direction of media-literacy priorities. This is separate from content removal or the public-statement route.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may direct media-literacy priorities for a specified period",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Enacted s175(1),(3) permits direction to Ofcom to issue a notice to a specified provider or providers generally. It compels a public-accounting route, not on this text a direction to remove any specified lawful post.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ministernotice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may require public statement notices",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section175(7) permits variation/revocation; under(8) Ofcom may consequentially vary/revoke a public statement notice. No revocation or automatic restoration of content is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may vary or revoke the direction",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section175(6) requires publication of reasons for a direction on public-health/safety grounds. The same subsection does not impose that duty for the national-security ground.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must publish reasons for health/safety-ground directions",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
            "targetName": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin",
            "title": "The cited DSIT meeting and confirmed planning records",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "In its own answer to1(a)-(c), PDF2, Ofcom confirms an initial internal planning document, says work commenced23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary of State correspondence, and says final approval was completed between21May and26May2026. These are agency statements about its records, not the underlying planning document, letters or signed approvals. They establish a precise prior planning/approval trail to seek; they do not disclose the4August2025meeting or who approved the text. The requester-provided Belfast narrative onPDF1 is separately attributed and is not Ofcom's confirmation of every background claim.",
            "matched": [
              "Secretary of State"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c69ca48749f143b38b1efd965c7bd58eb5d6a5975b57a9f22af5cdcd9f71604a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind",
            "heading": "Who can initiate and who decides",
            "text": "There is a specifically added government input. Paragraphs3.11 and3.23 say an Ofcom public statement notice issued under a Secretary of State section175 direction should be considered alongside the provider's indicators. Paragraphs3.46-47 expressly connect this amendment to two stakeholders' questions about the interaction. Footnote29, PDF17, identifies Full Fact's response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on4August2025. This is a regulator-attributed link between consultation/departmental engagement and an actual drafting change. It does not disclose what either participant asked or prove they proposed or controlled the resulting wording. Their underlying records are the discriminating evidence still to obtain.",
            "matched": [
              "Secretary of State"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3c31274e462fee30c9ab5e66d59997e021586c7471690b540df1c9e24ab51ad0"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-notice",
      "label": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Ofcom notice requires a provider public statement by the specified date; subsection5 permits information needed to respond to the threat. Notice and direction can be varied/revoked; actual worked notice not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-notice",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-notice",
        "name": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Ofcom notice requires a provider public statement by the specified date; subsection5 permits information needed to respond to the threat. Notice and direction can be varied/revoked; actual worked notice not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Ofcom notice requires a provider public statement by the specified date; subsection5 permits information needed to respond to the threat. Notice and direction can be varied/revoked; actual worked notice not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A section 175 public-statement notice is the Online Safety Act mechanism through which Ofcom requires a provider to publish an account of its response to a specified threat. Related information may also be required under the statutory conditions.",
        "structuralRole": "Compulsory public accounting and information route through Ofcom",
        "significance": "The mechanism connects a ministerial direction to a provider's explanation of its own actions. That can increase pressure and visibility during a crisis, while remaining distinct from a command to remove a particular post. Its function depends on what the actual direction and notice require.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Statutory sequence",
            "text": "A Secretary of State direction under section 175(3) requires Ofcom to issue the notice to specified providers or providers generally. The notice sets a date for describing steps taken; subsection 5 permits information needed to respond to the threat. Reasons must be published for directions on public-health or safety grounds, with a different position for national security under the cited subsection. No worked direction, named recipient or exercised information demand was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
              "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
              "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section175(6) requires publication of reasons for a direction on public-health/safety grounds. The same subsection does not impose that duty for the national-security ground.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must publish reasons for health/safety-ground directions",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State — OSA section175 role",
            "targetName": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "A public statement notice requires the provider to describe steps taken in response to the threat by the specified date; publication is not itself a takedown command.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-publicaccount"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "can require a public statement by a specified date",
            "sourceName": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "targetName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "A direction under s175(3) requires Ofcom to give a public statement notice. No particular direction, notice or recipient was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must issue a notice under a qualifying direction",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Section175 public statement / information notice",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
            "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-lechannel",
      "label": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Recommended for large in-scope services when the provider determines a crisis. Fast incoming information is distinct from routine legal data requests or a general duty to disclose to police.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-lechannel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-lechannel",
        "name": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Recommended for large in-scope services when the provider determines a crisis. Fast incoming information is distinct from routine legal data requests or a general duty to disclose to police.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recommended for large in-scope services when the provider determines a crisis. Fast incoming information is distinct from routine legal data requests or a general duty to disclose to police."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recommended for large in-scope services when the provider determines a crisis. Fast incoming information is distinct from routine legal data requests or a general duty to disclose to police.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Large in-scope services should provide a dedicated law-enforcement channel after their own crisis determination. Smaller high-risk protocol scope does not automatically carry this channel requirement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-policechannel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "recommends a dedicated channel for large services",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "targetName": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The channel is for fast crisis information into large services. Existing legal processes for routine data requests remain; Ofcom disclaims general power here to compel disclosure to police.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-channeloperation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would operate a conditional incoming-information channel",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Dedicated crisis law-enforcement channel",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-analysis",
      "label": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Statement and draft specify records/analysis; no universal public ledger or automatic submission of every analysis adopted. Ofcom may request records. The90-day analysis/protocol language is not an individual restoration guarantee.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-analysis",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-analysis",
        "name": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statement and draft specify records/analysis; no universal public ledger or automatic submission of every analysis adopted. Ofcom may request records. The90-day analysis/protocol language is not an individual restoration guarantee.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statement and draft specify records/analysis; no universal public ledger or automatic submission of every analysis adopted. Ofcom may request records. The90-day analysis/protocol language is not an individual restoration guarantee."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Statement and draft specify records/analysis; no universal public ledger or automatic submission of every analysis adopted. Ofcom may request records. The90-day analysis/protocol language is not an individual restoration guarantee.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The statement recommends ending the protocol when criteria end or at90days, sooner, then analysis/records. Continuing risks shift to ordinary operations; this is not a90-day restoration promise.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "would retain post-crisis analysis and key records",
            "sourceName": "Providers within crisis-measure scope",
            "targetName": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Providers retain records and Ofcom may seek them or ask about activation; no universal routine public/submitted ledger was adopted. No particular suppressed record or request is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may seek records for supervision",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DraftC11.7 expressly sets analysis/improvement timing. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-protocol-at90days sentence; neither guarantees restoration of removals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets analysis timing at crisis end or90days if earlier",
            "sourceName": "Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft",
            "targetName": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-safeguards",
      "label": "Existing moderation appeals, expression and privacy safeguards",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "The crisis measure retains existing safeguards rather than creating a freestanding universal new remedy. Ofcom acknowledges potential false positives; no actual over-removal case or repair result acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-safeguards",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-safeguards",
        "name": "Existing moderation appeals, expression and privacy safeguards",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The crisis measure retains existing safeguards rather than creating a freestanding universal new remedy. Ofcom acknowledges potential false positives; no actual over-removal case or repair result acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The crisis measure retains existing safeguards rather than creating a freestanding universal new remedy. Ofcom acknowledges potential false positives; no actual over-removal case or repair result acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The crisis measure retains existing safeguards rather than creating a freestanding universal new remedy. Ofcom acknowledges potential false positives; no actual over-removal case or repair result acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Existing moderation/reporting/appeal, privacy and expression protections remain; no free-standing universal crisis appeal is created. Accuracy safeguards coexist with acknowledged possible false positives.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-retainappeals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "retains existing appeal, expression and privacy safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026",
            "targetName": "Existing moderation appeals, expression and privacy safeguards",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-childdraft",
      "label": "Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Submitted12June and laid18June2026. Blank signatures and bracketed commencement remain. C11.7 sets analysis timing, distinct from the statement's protocol-end explanation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-childdraft",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-childdraft",
        "name": "Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Submitted12June and laid18June2026. Blank signatures and bracketed commencement remain. C11.7 sets analysis timing, distinct from the statement's protocol-end explanation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Submitted12June and laid18June2026. Blank signatures and bracketed commencement remain. C11.7 sets analysis timing, distinct from the statement's protocol-end explanation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Submitted12June and laid18June2026. Blank signatures and bracketed commencement remain. C11.7 sets analysis timing, distinct from the statement's protocol-end explanation.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The draft was submitted12June and laid18June2026; HCWS124 confirms laying and conditional40-day scrutiny then21days after issue. Blanks/brackets are not completed issue or commencement, and40days is not necessarily calendar days.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-laidchild"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submitted crisis code amendments for parliamentary process",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft",
            "date": "Submitted2026-06-12; laid2026-06-18; later crisis commencement unresolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DraftC11.7 expressly sets analysis/improvement timing. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-protocol-at90days sentence; neither guarantees restoration of removals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets analysis timing at crisis end or90days if earlier",
            "sourceName": "Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft",
            "targetName": "Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
            "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind"
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-planning",
      "label": "Initial Ofcom crisis planning document — existence confirmed",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "FOI response says initial planning began23October2024 after17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. Underlying plan and correspondence were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-planning",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-planning",
        "name": "Initial Ofcom crisis planning document — existence confirmed",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "FOI response says initial planning began23October2024 after17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. Underlying plan and correspondence were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FOI response says initial planning began23October2024 after17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. Underlying plan and correspondence were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FOI response says initial planning began23October2024 after17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. Underlying plan and correspondence were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FOI02210914 says work began23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. This is agency confirmation, not acquisition of those letters or the plan contents.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-planningreported"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "confirmed an initial planning document and chronology",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Initial Ofcom crisis planning document — existence confirmed",
            "date": "Workbegan2024-10-23;confirmed2026-06-19."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin",
            "title": "The cited DSIT meeting and confirmed planning records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-approval",
      "label": "Crisis recommendations approval — 21–26 May2026 window",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Ofcom FOI response reports final approval in this range. The approval record, named approver and clearance conditions are not retained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-approval",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-approval",
        "name": "Crisis recommendations approval — 21–26 May2026 window",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Ofcom FOI response reports final approval in this range. The approval record, named approver and clearance conditions are not retained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Ofcom FOI response reports final approval in this range. The approval record, named approver and clearance conditions are not retained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ofcom FOI response reports final approval in this range. The approval record, named approver and clearance conditions are not retained.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The same FOI response identifies21–26May2026 as final approval. It does not supply a signed approval, approver identity or veto conditions. Its separate no-either/or-choice answer does not mean no approval brief exists.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-approvalreported"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a final approval window",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "Crisis recommendations approval — 21–26 May2026 window",
            "date": "2026-05-21 through2026-05-26; exact act/day unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin",
            "title": "The cited DSIT meeting and confirmed planning records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-nciimeasure",
      "label": "NCII hash-matching measure — separate September2026 status",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Official September9 sources give30September2026 for a distinct NCII measure. This is not crisis-code commencement, an exclusive StopNCII procurement requirement or evidence of implementation by a named service.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-nciimeasure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-nciimeasure",
        "name": "NCII hash-matching measure — separate September2026 status",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Official September9 sources give30September2026 for a distinct NCII measure. This is not crisis-code commencement, an exclusive StopNCII procurement requirement or evidence of implementation by a named service.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official September9 sources give30September2026 for a distinct NCII measure. This is not crisis-code commencement, an exclusive StopNCII procurement requirement or evidence of implementation by a named service."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official September9 sources give30September2026 for a distinct NCII measure. This is not crisis-code commencement, an exclusive StopNCII procurement requirement or evidence of implementation by a named service.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "September9 official news/enforcement sources identify30September for NCII hash-matching. That date is not imported into the crisis protocol or unrelated CMA verification proposals. No named service implementation established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-nciidate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announced a separate30September2026 NCII measure",
            "sourceName": "Ofcom",
            "targetName": "NCII hash-matching measure — separate September2026 status",
            "date": "2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
            "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-statewatch",
      "label": "Statewatch",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A civil-liberties organisation examining state powers, surveillance and the effects of security policy.",
      "aliases": [
        "State Watch"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Civil-liberties research & advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-statewatch",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-statewatch",
        "name": "Statewatch",
        "role": "Civil-liberties research & advocacy",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "A civil-liberties organisation examining state powers, surveillance and the effects of security policy.",
        "why": "It is a useful counterexample to the assumption that a common donor produces identical positions: it received Oak support while opposing forms of surveillance defended elsewhere in the safety field.",
        "about": [
          "In September 2023, Statewatch endorsed objections to the EU child-abuse proposal over broad scanning and possible identity requirements. Its Oak grant in the 2025 report came later and cannot explain the origin of that earlier intervention."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "State Watch"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A civil-liberties organisation examining state powers, surveillance and the effects of security policy.",
        "structuralRole": "A countervailing voice within overlapping funding networks",
        "significance": "Statewatch supplies a documented civil-liberties objection within a network where some donors also support online-safety advocates. That makes it useful evidence of disagreement and competing policy aims among institutions with overlapping support.",
        "background": [
          "In September 2023, Statewatch endorsed objections to the EU child-abuse proposal over broad scanning and possible identity requirements. Its Oak grant in the 2025 report came later and cannot explain the origin of that earlier intervention."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statewatch identifies itself among signatories to the EDRi-coordinated statement published13September2023. Claims about scanning, identity checks and rights are the statement's position, not independently verified law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published and endorsed a proposal objection",
            "sourceName": "Statewatch",
            "targetName": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
            "date": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swlettersign"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was a signatory to a published safeguards letter",
            "sourceName": "Statewatch",
            "targetName": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
            "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak2025 lists USD303622 over three years for Statewatch news/information/analysis on EU justice and home-affairs spending. The row does not label this core support. No exact term, payment or funding of its earlier2023 stance is established. Financial details: value: 303,622; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Exact contracting Oak entity and legal recipient identifiers not supplied by row.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a three-year information and analysis grant",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Statewatch",
            "date": "2025 report; exact approval/term dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference",
            "heading": "What the comparison can establish",
            "text": "A common Oak funding node connects organisations that have publicly advocated different boundaries on digital power. This supports a model with recipient agency, differing programme objectives and contest over implementation. It weakens a uniform-policy inference from shared funding alone. It neither erases selection/renewal leverage nor proves all recipients independent in every decision. Statewatch's UK letter is critical engagement seeking constrained enforcement and remedies, not evidence it rejects all online-safety regulation or every form of age assurance. The sharper questions are which decisions a funder can approve, which decisions intermediaries allocate elsewhere, and whose proposed controls are actually adopted.",
            "matched": [
              "Statewatch"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "671d35d4001264eaa9e354d039f5aab7044305f5e90197dabcba656d02fd4b26"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Shared resources do not settle the policy position",
            "text": "Oak's grants make an instructive comparison. Its published 2025 awards include three-year support to Check My Ads, Digital Freedom Fund and Statewatch. Statewatch endorsed objections to broad scanning and possible identity requirements in the EU child-abuse proposal; the WeProtect Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in a different, earlier version of that debate. The comparison is evidence of divergent interventions, not a same-draft controlled experiment.",
            "matched": [
              "Statewatch"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "981e2dd7575f1dc57c9901eb0de21eeedcc8ae7ad1915689d6c034e36966ad77"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
            "title": "Oak support for Check My Ads: a verified grant, bounded terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-dff",
      "label": "Digital Freedom Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A fund supporting legal action to advance digital rights, including work by civil-liberties organisations.",
      "aliases": [
        "DFF"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Digital-rights litigation funder"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-dff",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-dff",
        "name": "Digital Freedom Fund",
        "role": "Digital-rights litigation funder",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "intro": "A fund supporting legal action to advance digital rights, including work by civil-liberties organisations.",
        "why": "It provides a second layer of allocation: a foundation can fund DFF, and DFF then chooses litigation to support through its own process.",
        "about": [
          "DFF reports external peer involvement in project selection. It also reports support for Liberty’s challenge concerning the alleged Apple technical-capability notice. Liberty filed in March 2025, before the reported June 2026 grant; the grant could sustain the challenge, rather than originate it."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "DFF"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
          "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A fund supporting legal action to advance digital rights, including work by civil-liberties organisations.",
        "structuralRole": "Resources for digital-rights litigation",
        "significance": "Digital Freedom Fund connects philanthropic support with the capacity to bring legal challenges on digital rights. It represents a possible route for contesting decisions elsewhere in the network rather than simply expanding the same policy agenda.",
        "background": [
          "DFF reports external peer involvement in project selection. It also reports support for Liberty’s challenge concerning the alleged Apple technical-capability notice. Liberty filed in March 2025, before the reported June 2026 grant; the grant could sustain the challenge, rather than originate it."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak2025 lists USD631579 over three years of DFF core support for digital rights in Europe. No traced earmark to Liberty, specific case-payment or authority over selection is established. Financial details: value: 631,579; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Contracting Oak group entity and precise recipient legal identifier not supplied by row.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-oakdff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported three-year core support",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "date": "2025 report; exact approval/term dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "DFF's linked case page reports Liberty, EUR36000, Litigation Track Support; the dated announcement places the grant in the June2026 round. Exact term, payment and agreement conditions remain not obtained; trailing inconsistent recipient field is preserved as anomaly. Financial details: value: 36,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported litigation-support grant; period: June2026 round; grant term unknown Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-libertyaward"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported EUR36000 litigation support",
            "sourceName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "targetName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "date": "June2026 reported approval; exact day and term unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The18August2026 announcement reports a June round of16grants totaling EUR500000. This aggregate is not a payment, Liberty's allocation or an independently audited budget. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported aggregate approved grants; period: June2026 round Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-dffround"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported16 grants approved in June2026",
            "sourceName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "targetName": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "date": "ApprovalJune2026, exact day unknown; announced2026-08-18."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The October2024 call proposed peer recommendations replacing the expert-panel stage for pre-litigation grants. Litigation-track grants initially remained under the existing process; later expansion was an intention.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced a pre-litigation-only pilot",
            "sourceName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "targetName": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "date": "2024-10-08 – 2024-10-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Shared resources do not settle the policy position",
            "text": "Oak's grants make an instructive comparison. Its published 2025 awards include three-year support to Check My Ads, Digital Freedom Fund and Statewatch. Statewatch endorsed objections to broad scanning and possible identity requirements in the EU child-abuse proposal; the WeProtect Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in a different, earlier version of that debate. The comparison is evidence of divergent interventions, not a same-draft controlled experiment.",
            "matched": [
              "Digital Freedom Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "981e2dd7575f1dc57c9901eb0de21eeedcc8ae7ad1915689d6c034e36966ad77"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
            "title": "Oak support for Check My Ads: a verified grant, bounded terms"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
            "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Digital Freedom Fund finances work defending digital rights in Europe, including legal challenges. Its disclosed June 2026 grant round and support for Liberty's challenge to technical capability notice powers show how philanthropic resources can become organized resistance to intrusive digital controls.",
          "structuralRole": "Allocating resources for digital-rights challenges and legal remedies",
          "significance": "DFF belongs among the network's consequential actors because money can support a challenge as well as a restriction. Its grants help turn objections about digital power into research, legal preparation and litigation that institutions must answer.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Digital Freedom Fund supports digital-rights work in Europe, including litigation and the preparation needed to bring legal challenges. In a network filled with institutions developing controls and compliance systems, it represents another use of organized resources: enabling people and organizations to contest the exercise of power through law.",
            "Its August 2026 announcement reported sixteen grants approved in June, totaling €500,000. A linked case page identified €36,000 in litigation-track support for Liberty's challenge concerning technical capability notice powers under the Investigatory Powers Act. The described issue concerns compelled access to encrypted communications and associated rights. A grant of this kind supports the specialist capacity needed to sustain a challenge through a legal process.",
            "DFF itself receives philanthropic support. Oak Foundation's 2025 report listed a $631,579 three-year core-support award for its European digital-rights work. That places it in the same broader funding landscape as organizations advocating stronger platform controls and advertising-risk interventions. The grants' purposes make the important difference visible: some resources build new systems of oversight, while others equip organizations to challenge their scope or use.",
            "The fund also makes decisions about how support is allocated. An October 2024 pilot proposed using peer recommendations in place of the expert-panel stage for pre-litigation grants, while keeping litigation grants under the existing process initially. These choices determine which kinds of challenge obtain resources and whose judgment informs selection. DFF matters because legal remedies need institutions behind them: funding, expertise and procedures can help an objection become a case that a public authority or company must confront."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
              "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
              "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
              "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
            },
            {
              "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
              "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-ihr",
      "label": "Oak International Human Rights programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Programme strategy supports plural media, reliable information, accountable digital space and rights defenders/intermediaries. Shared strategy does not establish identical recipient positions or donor approval of particular campaigns.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-ihr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-ihr",
        "name": "Oak International Human Rights programme",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Programme strategy supports plural media, reliable information, accountable digital space and rights defenders/intermediaries. Shared strategy does not establish identical recipient positions or donor approval of particular campaigns.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Programme strategy supports plural media, reliable information, accountable digital space and rights defenders/intermediaries. Shared strategy does not establish identical recipient positions or donor approval of particular campaigns."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Programme strategy supports plural media, reliable information, accountable digital space and rights defenders/intermediaries. Shared strategy does not establish identical recipient positions or donor approval of particular campaigns.",
        "structuralRole": "Programme",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Oak's current programme strategy combines media pluralism, reliable information and an open/accountable digital environment. Strategy is not a specific grant agreement, common political position or instruction to each recipient.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-oakstrategy"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes a human-rights funding strategy",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Oak International Human Rights programme",
            "date": "Undated webpage read2026-09-09."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-swcsa",
      "label": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Statewatch published the EDRi-coordinated statement13September2023 opposing the proposal without stronger rights/security safeguards. This is a dated position on a then-current proposal, not the same final text as every other statement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-swcsa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-swcsa",
        "name": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Statewatch published the EDRi-coordinated statement13September2023 opposing the proposal without stronger rights/security safeguards. This is a dated position on a then-current proposal, not the same final text as every other statement.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Statewatch published the EDRi-coordinated statement13September2023 opposing the proposal without stronger rights/security safeguards. This is a dated position on a then-current proposal, not the same final text as every other statement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Statewatch published the EDRi-coordinated statement13September2023 opposing the proposal without stronger rights/security safeguards. This is a dated position on a then-current proposal, not the same final text as every other statement.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The2023 statement objects to EUCSA proposal provisions on broad scanning and potential identity requirements. Existing WeProtect Secretariat support concerns an undated earlier record with2022 membership figures; comparison is issue orientation across dates/drafts, not a common final vote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "opposed agreement without stronger rights/security safeguards",
            "sourceName": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
            "targetName": "EU child-abuse legislation",
            "date": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statewatch identifies itself among signatories to the EDRi-coordinated statement published13September2023. Claims about scanning, identity checks and rights are the statement's position, not independently verified law.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Statewatch",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published and endorsed a proposal objection",
            "sourceName": "Statewatch",
            "targetName": "EU CSA objection endorsed by Statewatch — 2023",
            "date": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-swletter",
      "label": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "ORG-letterhead letter to Ofcom/technology companies, published by Statewatch4August2025; Statewatch signatory visible onPDF5. Requests, legal allegations, receipt and actual corrective outcomes are distinct.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-swletter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-swletter",
        "name": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "ORG-letterhead letter to Ofcom/technology companies, published by Statewatch4August2025; Statewatch signatory visible onPDF5. Requests, legal allegations, receipt and actual corrective outcomes are distinct.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "ORG-letterhead letter to Ofcom/technology companies, published by Statewatch4August2025; Statewatch signatory visible onPDF5. Requests, legal allegations, receipt and actual corrective outcomes are distinct."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "ORG-letterhead letter to Ofcom/technology companies, published by Statewatch4August2025; Statewatch signatory visible onPDF5. Requests, legal allegations, receipt and actual corrective outcomes are distinct.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swrequest"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ofcom",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requested clarification, transparency and conditional remedies",
            "sourceName": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
            "targetName": "Ofcom",
            "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-swlettersign"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Statewatch",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was a signatory to a published safeguards letter",
            "sourceName": "Statewatch",
            "targetName": "OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025",
            "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
            "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "label": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Principal recipient and repeated narrative in DFF case/announcement identify Liberty. A trailing Women's Link Worldwide field is inconsistent; no second recipient inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-liberty",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "name": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Principal recipient and repeated narrative in DFF case/announcement identify Liberty. A trailing Women's Link Worldwide field is inconsistent; no second recipient inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Principal recipient and repeated narrative in DFF case/announcement identify Liberty. A trailing Women's Link Worldwide field is inconsistent; no second recipient inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Liberty is the UK rights organisation identified as a Digital Freedom Fund litigation-support grantee and a participant in proceedings concerning the Investigatory Powers Act technical-capability-notice regime. Its complaint with Privacy International predates the identified June 2026 grant round.",
        "structuralRole": "Rights challenger receiving support for litigation capacity",
        "significance": "Liberty connects philanthropic legal support to a challenge against state investigatory powers affecting encryption. The chronology matters: evidence of a later grant does not date the start of the challenge or establish earlier reimbursement. This route is distinct from Online Safety Act content or age-assurance proposals.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Proceedings and disclosed grants",
            "text": "Liberty says it filed on 13 March 2025, and the tribunal independently acknowledges filing the day before its 14 March hearing. It identifies Leigh Day as instructed counsel. DFF's linked case page reports a €36,000 Litigation Track Support grant, with its announcement placing it in the June 2026 round. A contradictory trailing recipient field is not treated as a second award. Oak's 2023 report separately lists a $783,133 three-year core-support grant, without earmarking it to this later case. Payments were not verified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
              "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge",
              "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
              "w32-gdi-e-representation",
              "w32-gdi-e-writtenarguments",
              "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
              "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
              "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Liberty says filing occurred13March2025; tribunal paragraph33 independently acknowledges filing the day before its14March hearing. This precedes the identified June2026 DFF grant, without establishing earlier funding or reimbursement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "filed the separate complaint",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
            "date": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Tribunal considered Liberty and PI arguments while declining attendance at the March hearing. Multiple open-justice submissions existed; exclusive causal credit for the outcome is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-writtenarguments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "had written arguments considered",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak2023 lists USD783133 over three years for core public/policymaker human-rights work. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 783,133; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "DFF's linked case page reports Liberty, EUR36000, Litigation Track Support; the dated announcement places the grant in the June2026 round. Exact term, payment and agreement conditions remain not obtained; trailing inconsistent recipient field is preserved as anomaly. Financial details: value: 36,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported litigation-support grant; period: June2026 round; grant term unknown Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-libertyaward"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported EUR36000 litigation support",
            "sourceName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "targetName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "date": "June2026 reported approval; exact day and term unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF describes Liberty's ongoing challenge to the IPA2016TCN regime concerning compelled encryption access and rights. No court pleading, actual notice or judicial outcome was within the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later proceedings remain outside this candidate. This is separate from the Online Safety Act and age-assurance proposals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty TCN-regime challenge — DFF account",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as pursuing a TCN-regime challenge",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Liberty TCN-regime challenge — DFF account",
            "date": "Undated page snapshot2026-09-09; litigation start/end not inferred."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Liberty states the organisations instructed Leigh Day. This is a representation account, not a fee or DFF/Oak payment record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Leigh Day",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported instructing counsel for the complaint",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Leigh Day",
            "date": "Reported13March2025; engagement dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          },
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
            "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Liberty is a UK civil-rights organization using legal action and public argument to challenge intrusive state powers. In this investigation, it appears through litigation concerning encrypted communications, efforts to open secretive proceedings, and disclosed support from Oak Foundation and the Digital Freedom Fund.",
          "structuralRole": "Using litigation and public scrutiny to constrain state access powers",
          "significance": "Liberty supplies an important counterforce in the network: organizational resources are being used to challenge government access and secrecy. Its work shows that shared philanthropic support can sustain institutions pulling policy in opposing directions, including through courts.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Liberty is a UK civil-rights organization whose role in this investigation centers on legal challenges to state surveillance powers. Its significance is practical: lawyers can contest the authority behind an access demand, press for open proceedings and seek decisions that change what a public institution may do. This gives the network a route for resistance as well as a route for expanding controls.",
            "Liberty and Privacy International filed a complaint on 13 March 2025 concerning the use of technical capability notice powers. The following day's hearing and a later public judgment supply part of the legal chronology. Liberty said the organizations instructed Leigh Day, and the tribunal considered their written arguments in proceedings involving Apple and the Home Secretary. Their intervention belongs to a wider contest over encrypted communications and the secrecy surrounding access demands.",
            "Its resources are partly visible. Oak Foundation's 2023 report listed $783,133 over three years for Liberty's core human-rights work with the public and policymakers. The Digital Freedom Fund later reported €36,000 in litigation support for a challenge to the technical capability notice regime, in a grant round approved in June 2026. The earlier complaint and later grant have their own dates and documentary histories.",
            "Liberty's presence changes how the wider map should be read. An organization can draw on the same philanthropic landscape as groups promoting more extensive digital regulation and then use that capacity to oppose intrusive powers. The decisive questions are what intervention it pursues, which authority it challenges and what remedy it seeks. Here, funding sustains a challenge to state access and secrecy through the legal system."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
              "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
              "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
              "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
              "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
            },
            {
              "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
              "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-dffround",
      "label": "DFF June2026 grant round",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "DFF's18August2026 announcement reports16 grants approved in June, EUR500000 aggregate. Not a Liberty allocation, payout proof or a statement that every2025 decision was peer-selected.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-dffround",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-dffround",
        "name": "DFF June2026 grant round",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "DFF's18August2026 announcement reports16 grants approved in June, EUR500000 aggregate. Not a Liberty allocation, payout proof or a statement that every2025 decision was peer-selected.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "DFF's18August2026 announcement reports16 grants approved in June, EUR500000 aggregate. Not a Liberty allocation, payout proof or a statement that every2025 decision was peer-selected."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DFF's18August2026 announcement reports16 grants approved in June, EUR500000 aggregate. Not a Liberty allocation, payout proof or a statement that every2025 decision was peer-selected.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The18August2026 announcement reports a June round of16grants totaling EUR500000. This aggregate is not a payment, Liberty's allocation or an independently audited budget. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported aggregate approved grants; period: June2026 round Payment status: unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-dffround"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported16 grants approved in June2026",
            "sourceName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "targetName": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "date": "ApprovalJune2026, exact day unknown; announced2026-08-18."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF attributes the June2026 round's review and decisions to its external Community Peer Group. This edge does not generalize to every2025 grant or determine actual reserved rights, adoption date or donor control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-peerselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF external Community Peer Group — June2026 selection role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was credited with review and grant selection",
            "sourceName": "DFF external Community Peer Group — June2026 selection role",
            "targetName": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "date": "June2026 selection round; exact day unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Previously accepted DFF announcement attributes the June round to the Peer Group. The staged-governance records clarify the process; they do not disclose a named Liberty vote, legal signatory or payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-juneselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with selecting the June 2026 grants",
            "sourceName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "targetName": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "date": "June2026 selections; individual selection days unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
            "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-peergroup",
      "label": "DFF external Community Peer Group — June2026 selection role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "DFF attributes review and selection of the June2026 round to an external peer group. Its charter, historic adoption timing and reserved rights belong to a separate excluded governance lane.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Governance body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-peergroup",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-peergroup",
        "name": "DFF external Community Peer Group — June2026 selection role",
        "role": "Governance body",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "DFF attributes review and selection of the June2026 round to an external peer group. Its charter, historic adoption timing and reserved rights belong to a separate excluded governance lane.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "DFF attributes review and selection of the June2026 round to an external peer group. Its charter, historic adoption timing and reserved rights belong to a separate excluded governance lane."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DFF attributes review and selection of the June2026 round to an external peer group. Its charter, historic adoption timing and reserved rights belong to a separate excluded governance lane.",
        "structuralRole": "Governance body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF attributes the June2026 round's review and decisions to its external Community Peer Group. This edge does not generalize to every2025 grant or determine actual reserved rights, adoption date or donor control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-peerselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was credited with review and grant selection",
            "sourceName": "DFF external Community Peer Group — June2026 selection role",
            "targetName": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "date": "June2026 selection round; exact day unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
            "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-tcn",
      "label": "Liberty TCN-regime challenge — DFF account",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Grantor describes an ongoing challenge concerning Investigatory Powers Act2016 technical capability notice powers and encryption rights. No actual notice, pleading, court disposition or payment was in the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later Liberty proceedings are outside this candidate. Separate from OSA/age assurance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w31-fa-tcn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-tcn",
        "name": "Liberty TCN-regime challenge — DFF account",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Grantor describes an ongoing challenge concerning Investigatory Powers Act2016 technical capability notice powers and encryption rights. No actual notice, pleading, court disposition or payment was in the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later Liberty proceedings are outside this candidate. Separate from OSA/age assurance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Grantor describes an ongoing challenge concerning Investigatory Powers Act2016 technical capability notice powers and encryption rights. No actual notice, pleading, court disposition or payment was in the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later Liberty proceedings are outside this candidate. Separate from OSA/age assurance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "funding-authority",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Grantor describes an ongoing challenge concerning Investigatory Powers Act2016 technical capability notice powers and encryption rights. No actual notice, pleading, court disposition or payment was in the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later Liberty proceedings are outside this candidate. Separate from OSA/age assurance.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF describes Liberty's ongoing challenge to the IPA2016TCN regime concerning compelled encryption access and rights. No court pleading, actual notice or judicial outcome was within the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later proceedings remain outside this candidate. This is separate from the Online Safety Act and age-assurance proposals.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as pursuing a TCN-regime challenge",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Liberty TCN-regime challenge — DFF account",
            "date": "Undated page snapshot2026-09-09; litigation start/end not inferred."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
            "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-peer",
      "label": "DFF Community Peer Group",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "DFF describes peers selecting grants within an institutional process and available budget. Actual appointment, recusal terms, legal binding force and payment authority are not disclosed. Member affiliations are not reserved corporate seats.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-peer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-peer",
        "name": "DFF Community Peer Group",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "DFF describes peers selecting grants within an institutional process and available budget. Actual appointment, recusal terms, legal binding force and payment authority are not disclosed. Member affiliations are not reserved corporate seats.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "DFF describes peers selecting grants within an institutional process and available budget. Actual appointment, recusal terms, legal binding force and payment authority are not disclosed. Member affiliations are not reserved corporate seats."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Digital Freedom Fund Community Peer Group is the peer-selection body described in DFF's participatory grantmaking process. Peers deliberate with staff support, access other assessments and budgets, and sign terms covering confidentiality and conflicts.",
        "structuralRole": "Community participants selecting projects within a funder's process",
        "significance": "The group moves part of project selection closer to people from the relevant community while retaining an institutional setting that supplies budgets, information and legal administration. Reported selection is therefore more specific than informal consultation, but does not disclose every binding award or payment authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported rounds and conditions",
            "text": "DFF's retrospective describes ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects, followed by seventeen choosing thirteen projects across pre-litigation and litigation tracks. It attributes the June 2026 round to the Peer Group. Staff facilitate discussion and provide prior-grantee information and assessments. DFF says members receive compensation and sign Terms of Reference; the operative recusal rules, amounts, appointment details and any named Liberty vote were not acquired. Members' affiliations are not treated as reserved corporate seats.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
              "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
              "w32-gdi-e-terms",
              "w32-gdi-e-juneselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
              "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF retrospective reports ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects, then seventeen choosing thirteen projects across both types. These are reported selections, not inspected award contracts or evidence all2025 DFF decisions used peers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-peerselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly selected projects in two 2025 rounds",
            "sourceName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "targetName": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "date": "2025 rounds; exact selection dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Staff facilitate discussion and supply previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Published participant accounts describe judgment factors, not a binding scoring rubric or budget-setting authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF grant-team facilitation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provides review information and facilitation",
            "sourceName": "DFF grant-team facilitation",
            "targetName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "date": "Retrospective published25March2026; exact practice interval unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Previously accepted DFF announcement attributes the June round to the Peer Group. The staged-governance records clarify the process; they do not disclose a named Liberty vote, legal signatory or payment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-juneselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with selecting the June 2026 grants",
            "sourceName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "targetName": "DFF June2026 grant round",
            "date": "June2026 selections; individual selection days unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Peer Group Terms of Reference",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as requiring confidentiality and conflict commitments",
            "sourceName": "Peer Group Terms of Reference",
            "targetName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          },
          {
            "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
            "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
      "label": "DFF board: adoption role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "DFF reports board adoption of the participatory grant-decision process in March2026. Resolution and award-by-award rights were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-dffboard",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
        "name": "DFF board: adoption role",
        "role": "Body",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "DFF reports board adoption of the participatory grant-decision process in March2026. Resolution and award-by-award rights were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "DFF reports board adoption of the participatory grant-decision process in March2026. Resolution and award-by-award rights were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DFF reports board adoption of the participatory grant-decision process in March2026. Resolution and award-by-award rights were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated retrospective says the board ended the pilot by adopting the process in March2026. No original resolution or complete transfer/retention of legal contracting powers was inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly adopted the process in March 2026",
            "sourceName": "DFF board: adoption role",
            "targetName": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "date": "March2026; exact adoption day unknown. Article publication25March is not substituted for the vote date."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-dffstaff",
      "label": "DFF grant-team facilitation",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Staff supply earlier-grantee information, assessments and budgets and facilitate discussion. No exclusive final selection or payment-signature power inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-dffstaff",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-dffstaff",
        "name": "DFF grant-team facilitation",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Staff supply earlier-grantee information, assessments and budgets and facilitate discussion. No exclusive final selection or payment-signature power inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Staff supply earlier-grantee information, assessments and budgets and facilitate discussion. No exclusive final selection or payment-signature power inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Staff supply earlier-grantee information, assessments and budgets and facilitate discussion. No exclusive final selection or payment-signature power inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Staff facilitate discussion and supply previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Published participant accounts describe judgment factors, not a binding scoring rubric or budget-setting authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provides review information and facilitation",
            "sourceName": "DFF grant-team facilitation",
            "targetName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "date": "Retrospective published25March2026; exact practice interval unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-peerterms",
      "label": "Peer Group Terms of Reference",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Current page says members sign confidentiality/conflict terms and are compensated. Actual terms, recusal rules, compensation amounts and appointment/removal provisions remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-peerterms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-peerterms",
        "name": "Peer Group Terms of Reference",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Current page says members sign confidentiality/conflict terms and are compensated. Actual terms, recusal rules, compensation amounts and appointment/removal provisions remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current page says members sign confidentiality/conflict terms and are compensated. Actual terms, recusal rules, compensation amounts and appointment/removal provisions remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current page says members sign confidentiality/conflict terms and are compensated. Actual terms, recusal rules, compensation amounts and appointment/removal provisions remain not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-terms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is described as requiring confidentiality and conflict commitments",
            "sourceName": "Peer Group Terms of Reference",
            "targetName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation",
            "heading": "Consequence for the existing Liberty grant finding",
            "text": "The strongest alternative to a claim of complete authority transfer is that a genuine delegated selection process operates inside an institutional strategy, budget and legal framework whose reserved rights are not disclosed here. The exact discriminating records are the signed Peer Group Terms of Reference and incorporated conflict policy , the March 2026 board adoption/delegation resolution , and the applicable DFF grant agreement or execution policy . The first two would clarify appointment, recusal and the force of selections; the last would locate signature and payment authority. None was read in this bounded pass.",
            "matched": [
              "Peer Group Terms of Reference"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b40a9a36db4010273e854052292b3c2e33ac27fbedcb94226379e675de7ab3c2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
      "label": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "2024 proposal began with pre-litigation recommendations; DFF reports wider 2025 selection and March2026 board adoption. Strategy/criteria changes remained future work.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-peerprocess",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
        "name": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "2024 proposal began with pre-litigation recommendations; DFF reports wider 2025 selection and March2026 board adoption. Strategy/criteria changes remained future work.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 proposal began with pre-litigation recommendations; DFF reports wider 2025 selection and March2026 board adoption. Strategy/criteria changes remained future work."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DFF's participatory grant-selection process began as an October 2024 proposal to replace the expert-panel stage for pre-litigation recommendations. A later retrospective reports expanded selections and board adoption of the process in March 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "Staged transfer of selection participation into regular grantmaking",
        "significance": "The chronology shows a process changing scope: an initial limited pilot was followed by wider participation and reported institutional adoption. That is a concrete governance development, while the public narrative does not supply a complete legal delegation of contracting, budget-setting or payment powers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From pilot to reported adoption",
            "text": "The 8 October 2024 call initially left litigation-track grants under the existing process, describing broader participation as future work. DFF later reports one round of ten peers selecting three pre-litigation projects and another of seventeen selecting thirteen projects across both types. Its retrospective says the board ended the pilot by adopting the process in March 2026. The original board resolution and a complete allocation of retained legal authority were not acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-pilot",
              "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
              "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DFF retrospective reports ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects, then seventeen choosing thirteen projects across both types. These are reported selections, not inspected award contracts or evidence all2025 DFF decisions used peers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-peerselection"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly selected projects in two 2025 rounds",
            "sourceName": "DFF Community Peer Group",
            "targetName": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "date": "2025 rounds; exact selection dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The October2024 call proposed peer recommendations replacing the expert-panel stage for pre-litigation grants. Litigation-track grants initially remained under the existing process; later expansion was an intention.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-pilot"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced a pre-litigation-only pilot",
            "sourceName": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "targetName": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "date": "2024-10-08 – 2024-10-08"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated retrospective says the board ended the pilot by adopting the process in March2026. No original resolution or complete transfer/retention of legal contracting powers was inspected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DFF board: adoption role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reportedly adopted the process in March 2026",
            "sourceName": "DFF board: adoption role",
            "targetName": "DFF participatory grant-selection process",
            "date": "March2026; exact adoption day unknown. Article publication25March is not substituted for the vote date."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
            "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-pi",
      "label": "Privacy International",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Liberty names Privacy International as co-complainant in March2025; tribunal acknowledges its written arguments and separate complaint. Oak2023 lists core support; exact funding of this case remains unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-pi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-pi",
        "name": "Privacy International",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Liberty names Privacy International as co-complainant in March2025; tribunal acknowledges its written arguments and separate complaint. Oak2023 lists core support; exact funding of this case remains unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Liberty names Privacy International as co-complainant in March2025; tribunal acknowledges its written arguments and separate complaint. Oak2023 lists core support; exact funding of this case remains unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Privacy International is the rights organisation named with Liberty in the March 2025 complaint concerning UK investigatory powers and encryption. The tribunal acknowledges the separate complaint and consideration of its written arguments; Oak's 2023 report separately lists support for its privacy work.",
        "structuralRole": "Privacy advocate combining litigation participation and core institutional support",
        "significance": "Privacy International connects a sustained privacy mission to a specific legal challenge. Earlier core funding can support general capacity without becoming an identified litigation budget. The court record separately shows the organisation's written participation, while leaving broader intervention and disclosure questions unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Complaint and disclosed support",
            "text": "Liberty's 13 March 2025 announcement names Privacy International and two individuals as complainants. The April tribunal judgment acknowledges the filing and considers the organisations' open-justice arguments alongside other submissions. Oak's 2023 report lists a $1,138,554 three-year grant for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance and data exploitation. It is a reported multi-year grant, not verified annual spending, cash receipt or an earmark for the later complaint.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
              "w32-gdi-e-piarguments",
              "w32-gdi-e-oakpi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
              "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recipient account names PI and two individuals; the tribunal acknowledges the organisations and individuals filed a separate complaint. No individual biographies or original pleading are imported.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-pifiled"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-filed the separate complaint",
            "sourceName": "Privacy International",
            "targetName": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
            "date": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PI written arguments were considered alongside Liberty and others. Intervention, pleading disclosure and future hearing arrangements remained unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-piarguments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "had written arguments considered",
            "sourceName": "Privacy International",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak2023 lists USD1138554 over three years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 1,138,554; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oakpi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Privacy International",
            "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The same original page26 lists three already relevant rights organisations: National Council for Civil Liberties (Liberty), USD783133/3years core support for public/policymaker human-rights work; Open Rights Group, USD437349/3years to support refugee/migrant-sector opposition to data collection/sharing and technologies driving immigration controls; and Privacy International, USD1138554/3years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. These earlier awards strengthen the common-funder/divergent-intervention evidence. None is a verified earmark for the later TCN complaint or Statewatch/ORG letter. Do not calculate the litigation budget from these amounts or claim the June2026 DFF grant was the only possible prior source of resources.",
            "matched": [
              "Privacy International"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "16df9a0dd5e5d6d2cad914bdda4b1bc20dba99b50c21f0f66c4b48598080ade5"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          },
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-org",
      "label": "Open Rights Group",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Oak2023 lists three-year support for work with refugee/migrant sectors concerning data and immigration technologies. No earmark to the later TCN case or OSA letter inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-org",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-org",
        "name": "Open Rights Group",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Oak2023 lists three-year support for work with refugee/migrant sectors concerning data and immigration technologies. No earmark to the later TCN case or OSA letter inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Oak2023 lists three-year support for work with refugee/migrant sectors concerning data and immigration technologies. No earmark to the later TCN case or OSA letter inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Oak2023 lists three-year support for work with refugee/migrant sectors concerning data and immigration technologies. No earmark to the later TCN case or OSA letter inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak2023 lists USD437349 over three years for refugee/migrant-sector work concerning data sharing and immigration-control technologies. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 437,349; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oakorg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Open Rights Group",
            "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The same original page26 lists three already relevant rights organisations: National Council for Civil Liberties (Liberty), USD783133/3years core support for public/policymaker human-rights work; Open Rights Group, USD437349/3years to support refugee/migrant-sector opposition to data collection/sharing and technologies driving immigration controls; and Privacy International, USD1138554/3years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. These earlier awards strengthen the common-funder/divergent-intervention evidence. None is a verified earmark for the later TCN complaint or Statewatch/ORG letter. Do not calculate the litigation budget from these amounts or claim the June2026 DFF grant was the only possible prior source of resources.",
            "matched": [
              "Open Rights Group"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "16df9a0dd5e5d6d2cad914bdda4b1bc20dba99b50c21f0f66c4b48598080ade5"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-complaint",
      "label": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Recipient account and tribunal paragraph33 establish a separate complaint filed before the identified June2026 DFF grant. Notice and original pleading not acquired; filing is not a merits victory or proof of initial financing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-complaint",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-complaint",
        "name": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Recipient account and tribunal paragraph33 establish a separate complaint filed before the identified June2026 DFF grant. Notice and original pleading not acquired; filing is not a merits victory or proof of initial financing.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Recipient account and tribunal paragraph33 establish a separate complaint filed before the identified June2026 DFF grant. Notice and original pleading not acquired; filing is not a merits victory or proof of initial financing."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient account and tribunal paragraph33 establish a separate complaint filed before the identified June2026 DFF grant. Notice and original pleading not acquired; filing is not a merits victory or proof of initial financing.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Liberty says filing occurred13March2025; tribunal paragraph33 independently acknowledges filing the day before its14March hearing. This precedes the identified June2026 DFF grant, without establishing earlier funding or reimbursement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "filed the separate complaint",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
            "date": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Recipient account names PI and two individuals; the tribunal acknowledges the organisations and individuals filed a separate complaint. No individual biographies or original pleading are imported.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-pifiled"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Privacy International",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-filed the separate complaint",
            "sourceName": "Privacy International",
            "targetName": "Liberty / Privacy International complaint, 13 March 2025",
            "date": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-ipt",
      "label": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Issued the April2025 public procedural ruling. The judgment is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; no current docket or finality audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Tribunal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-ipt",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-ipt",
        "name": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
        "role": "Tribunal",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Issued the April2025 public procedural ruling. The judgment is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; no current docket or finality audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Issued the April2025 public procedural ruling. The judgment is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; no current docket or finality audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Investigatory Powers Tribunal is the UK tribunal that issued the public 7 April 2025 procedural judgment in Apple v. Home Secretary. The published ruling is a summary or extract of a fuller private judgment.",
        "structuralRole": "Judicial forum balancing secrecy and public case information",
        "significance": "The tribunal controls what can be disclosed and who participates in proceedings within its jurisdiction. The acquired decision demonstrates a limited open-justice outcome: basic case details could be public while the particular hearing remained private. That is different from determining the lawfulness of the reported encryption demand.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The procedural decision",
            "text": "The tribunal refused the request to conceal basic information about the case. It considered written third-party arguments, including those of Liberty and Privacy International, but did not permit those organisations to attend the March hearing. The judgment neither confirms nor refutes media accounts of the alleged notice, and does not establish a merits ruling or unrestricted public access to later proceedings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-courtissued",
              "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
              "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The tribunal refused concealment of basic case details. This procedural outcome is not a merits ruling against encryption-access powers or blanket public access to future proceedings.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "dismissed the confidentiality application",
            "sourceName": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "targetName": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The court considered third-party written arguments but did not permit the organisations to attend this hearing. That limitation coexists with disclosure of basic case information.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Private tribunal hearing, 14 March 2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "kept the March hearing private",
            "sourceName": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "targetName": "Private tribunal hearing, 14 March 2025",
            "date": "2025-03-14 – 2025-03-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public ruling is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; neither confirms nor refutes media accounts of the alleged notice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-courtissued"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued the public procedural judgment",
            "sourceName": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-judgment",
      "label": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "[2025] UKIPTrib1, IPT/25/68/CH. Dismissed request to conceal basic case details, while keeping March hearing private and leaving other participation/disclosure issues unresolved. Does not confirm reported notice or decide TCN legality.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-judgment",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-judgment",
        "name": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "[2025] UKIPTrib1, IPT/25/68/CH. Dismissed request to conceal basic case details, while keeping March hearing private and leaving other participation/disclosure issues unresolved. Does not confirm reported notice or decide TCN legality.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "[2025] UKIPTrib1, IPT/25/68/CH. Dismissed request to conceal basic case details, while keeping March hearing private and leaving other participation/disclosure issues unresolved. Does not confirm reported notice or decide TCN legality."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Apple v. Home Secretary, [2025] UKIPTrib 1, is the 7 April 2025 public procedural judgment in case IPT/25/68/CH. It addresses concealment of basic case information and participation in a private hearing, rather than the legality of a technical capability notice.",
        "structuralRole": "Published procedural window into otherwise restricted proceedings",
        "significance": "The judgment establishes a narrow but consequential transparency boundary. It confirms the existence and basic form of the case while leaving substantive secrecy questions and other participation issues unresolved. The consideration of rights organisations' arguments shows an input route without establishing exclusive credit for the outcome.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What was and was not decided",
            "text": "Apple is the named applicant. The tribunal rejected concealment of basic case details but kept the March hearing private, considering written arguments from Liberty, Privacy International and others. It separately acknowledges the organisations' complaint and possible overlap, without establishing completed joinder. The public text is an extract or summary of a fuller private judgment and neither confirms the reported notice nor rules on the merits of encryption-access powers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-courtissued",
              "w32-gdi-e-writtenarguments",
              "w32-gdi-e-piarguments",
              "w32-gdi-e-appleparty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Tribunal considered Liberty and PI arguments while declining attendance at the March hearing. Multiple open-justice submissions existed; exclusive causal credit for the outcome is not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-writtenarguments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "had written arguments considered",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PI written arguments were considered alongside Liberty and others. Intervention, pleading disclosure and future hearing arrangements remained unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-piarguments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Privacy International",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "had written arguments considered",
            "sourceName": "Privacy International",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Apple is the applicant in the caption. Liberty/PI proceedings are separately acknowledged with possible overlap; no completed joinder is claimed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-appleparty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Apple Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is the applicant named in the public ruling",
            "sourceName": "Apple Inc.",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Public ruling is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; neither confirms nor refutes media accounts of the alleged notice.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-courtissued"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "issued the public procedural judgment",
            "sourceName": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "targetName": "Apple v Home Secretary: 7 April 2025 public judgment",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-respondent",
      "label": "Secretary of State for the Home Department: 2025 respondent",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Named respondent in Apple procedural judgment. This litigation role is distinct from the existing generic OSA section175 ministerial role.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-respondent",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-respondent",
        "name": "Secretary of State for the Home Department: 2025 respondent",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Named respondent in Apple procedural judgment. This litigation role is distinct from the existing generic OSA section175 ministerial role.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Named respondent in Apple procedural judgment. This litigation role is distinct from the existing generic OSA section175 ministerial role."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named respondent in Apple procedural judgment. This litigation role is distinct from the existing generic OSA section175 ministerial role.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government application concerned basic public details of Apple proceedings. It is not treated as a request to keep every aspect of every separate complaint secret.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-govapplication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "asked to withhold basic case information",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State for the Home Department: 2025 respondent",
            "targetName": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
            "date": "Application heard14March2025; filing day not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
      "label": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The tribunal rejected the government application. The ruling did not make every future hearing or pleading public.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Procedural application"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
        "name": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
        "role": "Procedural application",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "The tribunal rejected the government application. The ruling did not make every future hearing or pleading public.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "The tribunal rejected the government application. The ruling did not make every future hearing or pleading public."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The tribunal rejected the government application. The ruling did not make every future hearing or pleading public.",
        "structuralRole": "Procedural application",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The tribunal refused concealment of basic case details. This procedural outcome is not a merits ruling against encryption-access powers or blanket public access to future proceedings.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "dismissed the confidentiality application",
            "sourceName": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "targetName": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
            "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government application concerned basic public details of Apple proceedings. It is not treated as a request to keep every aspect of every separate complaint secret.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-govapplication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secretary of State for the Home Department: 2025 respondent",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "asked to withhold basic case information",
            "sourceName": "Secretary of State for the Home Department: 2025 respondent",
            "targetName": "Application to conceal basic Apple case details",
            "date": "Application heard14March2025; filing day not established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-hearing",
      "label": "Private tribunal hearing, 14 March 2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "March hearing remained private despite written Liberty/PI arguments; future attendance, intervention and disclosure were not settled by this ruling.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-hearing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-hearing",
        "name": "Private tribunal hearing, 14 March 2025",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "March hearing remained private despite written Liberty/PI arguments; future attendance, intervention and disclosure were not settled by this ruling.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "March hearing remained private despite written Liberty/PI arguments; future attendance, intervention and disclosure were not settled by this ruling."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "March hearing remained private despite written Liberty/PI arguments; future attendance, intervention and disclosure were not settled by this ruling.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The court considered third-party written arguments but did not permit the organisations to attend this hearing. That limitation coexists with disclosure of basic case information.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "kept the March hearing private",
            "sourceName": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "targetName": "Private tribunal hearing, 14 March 2025",
            "date": "2025-03-14 – 2025-03-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-leighday",
      "label": "Leigh Day",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Liberty account says the organisations instructed Leigh Day. No fee, retainer or grant-funded allocation was inspected.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-leighday",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-leighday",
        "name": "Leigh Day",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Liberty account says the organisations instructed Leigh Day. No fee, retainer or grant-funded allocation was inspected.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Liberty account says the organisations instructed Leigh Day. No fee, retainer or grant-funded allocation was inspected."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Liberty account says the organisations instructed Leigh Day. No fee, retainer or grant-funded allocation was inspected.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Liberty states the organisations instructed Leigh Day. This is a representation account, not a fee or DFF/Oak payment record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-representation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported instructing counsel for the complaint",
            "sourceName": "Liberty — DFF grant recipient",
            "targetName": "Leigh Day",
            "date": "Reported13March2025; engagement dates unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
            "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "Global Disinformation Index",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An organisation assessing disinformation risk, with research and historical links to advertising-industry distribution.",
      "aliases": [
        "GDI",
        "disinformation",
        "blacklist"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "payments",
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Information-risk assessments"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-gdi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "name": "Global Disinformation Index",
        "role": "Information-risk assessments",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "intro": "An organisation assessing disinformation risk, with research and historical links to advertising-industry distribution.",
        "why": "Its work shows how an assessment can influence commercial decisions when a distributor puts it into tools advertisers use.",
        "about": [
          "GDI had a documented Oracle distribution route, but the relevant Oracle service ended in September 2024. IAS later said it discontinued limited past GDI inputs. Those historical relationships should not be drawn as current delivery routes.",
          "UK public funding, a German entity’s EU research contribution and a commercial advertising input are distinct relationships. A research warning does not itself order an advertising ban."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "GDI",
          "disinformation",
          "blacklist"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          },
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 18
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An organisation assessing disinformation risk, with research and historical links to advertising-industry distribution.",
        "structuralRole": "Risk assessments that can influence advertising revenue",
        "significance": "GDI connects research and risk classification with the advertising market. The important operational question is how a recipient uses a rating or exclusion list, and whether an assessed publisher can obtain a correction that changes the practical result.",
        "background": [
          "GDI had a documented Oracle distribution route, but the relevant Oracle service ended in September 2024. IAS later said it discontinued limited past GDI inputs. Those historical relationships should not be drawn as current delivery routes.",
          "UK public funding, a German entity’s EU research contribution and a commercial advertising input are distinct relationships. A research warning does not itself order an advertising ban."
        ],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Selected September2022 row records GBP130506, GL date5September2022, identifier300,000,130,671,861 line1, supplier GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX, Project Management category. GL date is not verified bank settlement, identifier not grant number, and row not allocated to either parliamentary total. Financial details: value: 130,506; currency: GBP; kind: published ledger/invoice-line amount; period: September2022 ledger; GL date5September Payment status: bank settlement unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ledger"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records a supplier invoice line with a 5 September 2022 GL date",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "GL accounting date only; preview updated28November2024. Not last-payment proof."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "D2.1 explicitly uses existing GDI lists among research, media and fact-checker contributions and some ChatGPT suggestions. No individual seed term is attributed exclusively to GDI, and the report does not establish which legal entity owned each background asset.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contributed pre-existing keyword resources to the design",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "date": "Submitted1November2023; individual contribution dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Privacy section1 and footer identify Disinformation Index Ltd11297397 as operator/controller. This supports the UK legal identity for that role, not parent ownership of the German company or all grant contracts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ukoperator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates the public website and acts as controller",
            "sourceName": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Current policy updated20April2026; corporate-role start and end unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Actual anchor in retained20April2026GDI article establishes a public referral, not membership, funding, authorship of classifications or identity of the AliExpress applicant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-gdilink"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "links readers to the DSA40 Collaboratory",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak2023 lists USD903614 over three years for core capacity to expand technological solutions addressing online disinformation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 903,614; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Ministerial answer149420 reports GBP1999026 provided between2019 and2022 for activities outside the US. Donor-reported aggregate, not a reconciled ledger or contractual restriction on every later use of knowledge/data. Financial details: value: 1,999,026; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported provided funding; period: between2019 and2022; exact boundaries unknown Payment status: donor-reported provision; individual payments unreconciled Which legal entity: Answer uses GDI name without recipient company identifier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported providing funding between 2019 and 2022",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Report date24February2023; between2019 and2022 exact period boundaries unspecified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Same answer reports a further GBP600797 in current financial year2022-2023. Do not add the separately displayed September2022 invoice row as an independent extra transfer. Financial details: value: 600,797; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported further funding; period: FY2022-2023 context Payment status: donor-reported provision; recipient receipt not independently reconciled",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported further funding in the then-current financial year",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Then-current financial year asof24February2023; exact payment dates not supplied."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GDI FON0071 describes commercial data licensing and charges, while licensees retain purchasing/data-use control. No amount, purchaser contract or actual transfer was acquired; current no-media/platform-funding self-description is not reconciled by this historical account.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-licensedata"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported charging for risk data licensed to buyers",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings",
            "title": "DSA research access: the decision-maker is identifiable; a GDI approval is not established",
            "heading": "GDI / AI4TRUST request or approval status",
            "text": "site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu \"GDI\" ; site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu \"AI4TRUST\" ; site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu \"Disinformation Index\" ; \"Global Disinformation Index\" \"vetted\" \"approved\" ; site:cnam.ie \"AI4TRUST\" ; site:cnam.ie \"Global Disinformation Index\" ; and site:bundesnetzagentur.de \"GDI\" \"researcher\" .",
            "matched": [
              "Global Disinformation Index"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c3feb7eb2c84dca015f2702678f8c53c8d16b9145ac6ea0c7605c95f3bb9c577"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Research access has its own gatekeepers",
            "text": "GDI's public funding and research work reveal further roles without completing an alleged government blacklist. FCDO described supervised activities outside the United States; the signed grant and commercial-reuse conditions remain unacquired. CORDIS identifies a German GDI entity and a €385,275 EU contribution to AI4TRUST, not the whole consortium budget or an assumed UK guarantee. Project documents show keywords and annotations, model-assisted triage and human review. A seed term is not a verdict; a research warning is not an advertising ban. GDI's request for mandatory tool/API compatibility is a bid for an institutional role, not proof of its award. A17",
            "matched": [
              "blacklist"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f4cec2af39ab419bcbd1b084526036c81076fb3b268a81483961470a3970e588"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          },
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
            "title": "FCDO–GDI remit: donor funding and review are documented; reuse rights are not"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Global Disinformation Index produces risk assessments intended to influence the commercial support available to online publishers. Its record combines philanthropic and UK public funding, historical licensing into advertising products, and a separate European research project with an agenda for greater platform-data access.",
          "structuralRole": "Turning information-risk assessments into commercial and policy inputs",
          "significance": "GDI matters where a judgment about information quality can affect advertising income. Its funding and distribution records let readers follow how research capacity becomes a product, and how that product enters decisions made by advertisers and their service providers.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The Global Disinformation Index assesses online information risks and has sought to reduce the commercial incentives supporting disinformation. Its public website is operated by the UK company Disinformation Index Ltd. The project is significant because advertising decisions can be influenced by a risk assessment without the assessed publisher ever dealing directly with the organization that produced it.",
            "The investigation found a concrete historical distribution route. Oracle's 2024 product guide described a GDI segment combining machine learning and expert review to identify high-risk news websites. GDI also told Parliament that it charged for licensed risk data, with buyers controlling their use of it. That Oracle service ended in September 2024, and Integral Ad Science later said it had discontinued limited past GDI inputs. The distribution history is therefore part of the story, rather than a picture of unchanged current delivery.",
            "Its resources include Oak Foundation's reported $903,614 three-year award in 2023. A UK ministerial answer reported nearly £2 million provided between 2019 and 2022, followed by a further £600,797 in the then-current financial year, for activities outside the United States. Those disclosures identify substantial institutional support for the work. They also provide a starting point for asking what outputs and reporting the funding required.",
            "A separate German GDI entity participated in the EU-funded AI4TRUST project. GDI described contributing to its decision-support work and later called for faster researcher vetting, compatible platform interfaces and audit access. Its role now spans both commercial classification and proposals about who should be allowed to inspect platforms. The common thread is authority to assess information and make those assessments useful to other institutions."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
              "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
              "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
              "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
            },
            {
              "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
              "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
            },
            {
              "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
              "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
      "label": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Current privacy text identifies company11297397, limited by guarantee in England, as website operator/controller. Ownership of the separately named German participant and legal recipient of every historical award are unestablished.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-gdiuk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
        "name": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Current privacy text identifies company11297397, limited by guarantee in England, as website operator/controller. Ownership of the separately named German participant and legal recipient of every historical award are unestablished.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current privacy text identifies company11297397, limited by guarantee in England, as website operator/controller. Ownership of the separately named German participant and legal recipient of every historical award are unestablished."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Disinformation Index Ltd, company 11297397, is the England-registered company limited by guarantee identified in GDI's privacy text as website operator and data controller. That legal identity is specific to the stated role.",
        "structuralRole": "UK legal operator with a published research-review route",
        "significance": "The company identity provides a concrete point of accountability for the website and its data practices. A published review route also identifies how a concern about research may be raised. Neither establishes automatic correction in every downstream advertising product or ownership of separately named overseas entities.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Identity and review provisions",
            "text": "The privacy text and footer identify Disinformation Index Ltd as operator and controller. The April 2026 policy describes consideration of concerns and appropriate review, clarification or updating, including a post-publication route where advance notice was absent. It does not guarantee reversal or specify a numerical complaint deadline. The retained record does not identify this company as recipient of every historical GDI award or parent of the German AI4TRUST participant.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ukoperator",
              "w32-gdi-e-researchreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
              "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Privacy section1 and footer identify Disinformation Index Ltd11297397 as operator/controller. This supports the UK legal identity for that role, not parent ownership of the German company or all grant contracts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ukoperator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "operates the public website and acts as controller",
            "sourceName": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Current policy updated20April2026; corporate-role start and end unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "April2026 policy15/19.3 promises consideration and appropriate review/clarification/update, with a post-publication route where no advance notice. It does not guarantee substantive reversal or numerical complaint deadline.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-researchreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers qualified review of research-output representations",
            "sourceName": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
            "targetName": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
            "date": "Policy last updated20April2026; operative start/end not independently established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-del",
      "label": "GDI Dynamic Exclusion List: historical licensing account",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Oak describes a licensed classification product used as an advertiser input. Exact historical licence, reviewer rules and current distribution are not disclosed by that account.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-del",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-del",
        "name": "GDI Dynamic Exclusion List: historical licensing account",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Oak describes a licensed classification product used as an advertiser input. Exact historical licence, reviewer rules and current distribution are not disclosed by that account.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Oak describes a licensed classification product used as an advertiser input. Exact historical licence, reviewer rules and current distribution are not disclosed by that account."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Oak describes a licensed classification product used as an advertiser input. Exact historical licence, reviewer rules and current distribution are not disclosed by that account.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Oak programme story supports reducing disinformation commercial incentives and describes DEL licensing to agencies/brand-safety firms/businesses. This is deliberate capacity support, not evidence Oak selects sites or commands buyers. Attributed revenue-reduction estimates are not integrated as measured outcomes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-donorpurpose"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oak Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described support for a commercial-incentive intervention",
            "sourceName": "Oak Foundation",
            "targetName": "GDI Dynamic Exclusion List: historical licensing account",
            "date": "2024-07-03 – 2024-07-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
            "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-oracle",
      "label": "Oracle",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Supplier published the2024 GDI segment guide and later Advertising end-of-life FAQ. Company policy is not a tested shutdown or GDI-specific continuing licence.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-oracle",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-oracle",
        "name": "Oracle",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Supplier published the2024 GDI segment guide and later Advertising end-of-life FAQ. Company policy is not a tested shutdown or GDI-specific continuing licence.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Supplier published the2024 GDI segment guide and later Advertising end-of-life FAQ. Company policy is not a tested shutdown or GDI-specific continuing licence."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Oracle published the Contextual Intelligence guide packaging GDI data for advertising use, then announced the end of its advertising services on 30 September 2024. The historical product documentation therefore establishes a former distribution route, not current delivery.",
        "structuralRole": "Former commercial distributor with contract-dependent residual data rights",
        "significance": "Oracle connected GDI's classifications to advertising targeting and avoidance tools. The subsequent service end changes how that relationship should be interpreted: historic availability remains evidence, while continued use of previously supplied data depends on specific terms. Closure of a service does not automatically prove deletion of every downstream copy.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "End-of-life policy and remaining rights",
            "text": "Version 3.0 of the 12 August 2024 FAQ includes Contextual Intelligence and supporting integrations in the September service end, with no new agreements or renewals and termination of data-provider relationships. It says prior-data rights depend on product service descriptions and that reporting or payments may continue during permitted use. The FAQ is informational rather than contractual. No executed GDI-specific agreement, post-service payment or runtime shutdown test was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
              "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
              "w32-gdi-e-priorrights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Version3.0 FAQ includes Contextual Intelligence and integrations in30September2024 end-of-life, no new agreements/renewals and end of data-provider relationships. Informational policy, not runtime proof or current GDI delivery.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oracleend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced an end to service and supporting access",
            "sourceName": "Oracle",
            "targetName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "date": "Printed FAQ date12August2024; announced service-end30September2024, not independently observed cutover."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Post-service use depends on product service descriptions and executed terms; reporting/payment obligations may persist. No GDI-specific continuing use, payment or universal deletion is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-priorrights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described conditional rights for previously supplied data",
            "sourceName": "Oracle",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": "2024-08-12 – 2024-08-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Oracle packages the branded GDI input for targeting/avoidance. The separate Floor-tier default on PDF3 is not assigned to this different segment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offered the GDI contextual segment",
            "sourceName": "Oracle",
            "targetName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "date": "2024 guide snapshot; not current channel proof."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary",
            "heading": "Oracle's subsequent service-end policy changes the time claim",
            "text": "Oracle's Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions , 12 August 2024, Version 3.0 , explicitly includes Contextual Intelligence and supporting integrations in the services ending 30 September 2024 . It says Oracle would take no new advertising agreements or renewals, end data-provider relationships, and terminate access even when an order extended beyond that date. This is a published provider policy, not evidence from a runtime test. It is sufficient to prevent presenting the historical guide as a current Oracle delivery channel.",
            "matched": [
              "Oracle"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e55afe969f09a0f46e89b2fcd96552a8020e56d8a7322cac71feda77c74c7775"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary",
            "heading": "Oracle's subsequent service-end policy changes the time claim",
            "text": "The same FAQ makes the residual boundary concrete. Rights to use previously supplied data depend on the product service description. Reporting and payment obligations may continue while data remains in use, and Oracle says payments for post-service data usage follow executed provider contracts. These are general provisions, not proof that GDI had a particular continuing licence, was paid after the end date, or that every stored classification was deleted. The FAQ itself says it is informational and does not form contractual obligations. The executed GDI/Oracle agreement and relevant service description remain unacquired.",
            "matched": [
              "Oracle"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "333d197b31809f2440b47dc2df52e53aedc72a8d807a21b8f830c9a9d2e9b5ed"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "A classification matters because someone acts on it",
            "text": "GDI illustrates why time matters. Its advertising-risk data had a documented Oracle distribution route, but Oracle's relevant service ended in September 2024. IAS later said it discontinued limited past GDI inputs. Historical relationships cannot establish present delivery. A publisher-review procedure may revise GDI's assessment, but the acquired record does not show automatic propagation to every buyer or an obligation to resume advertising. A16",
            "matched": [
              "Oracle"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5332993fc9d7e17da028118a490c251fd09e70247892c20789b3bc93b0eb8cb0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing",
            "heading": "What the evidence does and does not join",
            "text": "The strongest actual knowledge-flow evidence runs from GDI's existing resources into funded methodology . The retrospective supplies a later, attributed output claim. No selected record identifies that output with DEL, the former Oracle segment, IAS's former input, or the prospective OHMD. Similar risk terminology does not establish shared code, training data, licences, recipients or commercial deployment. Nothing here establishes that FCDO commissioned these inputs or directed subsequent exclusions.",
            "matched": [
              "Oracle"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7fa8462e936edc839ea849eac087de7bc86e361320f8bd312fcde9bf6ebaba8d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-segment",
      "label": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "2024 guide packages GDI high-risk news-site classifications. Advertiser selection/defaults and lost revenue unverified; Contextual Intelligence later included in announced30September2024 service end.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-segment",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-segment",
        "name": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "2024 guide packages GDI high-risk news-site classifications. Advertiser selection/defaults and lost revenue unverified; Contextual Intelligence later included in announced30September2024 service end.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2024 guide packages GDI high-risk news-site classifications. Advertiser selection/defaults and lost revenue unverified; Contextual Intelligence later included in announced30September2024 service end."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Oracle's historical gi_gdi_pfi segment packages GDI's high-risk news-website classifications within Contextual Intelligence. The 2024 guide describes machine-learning and expert-human-review inputs for advertiser targeting or avoidance decisions.",
        "structuralRole": "Packaged classification available for advertiser selection",
        "significance": "The segment is a concrete product form through which a research or risk assessment can enter buying infrastructure. Its existence establishes distribution capability, while a buyer's selected settings determine whether it affects a particular purchase. A default described for another product tier cannot be imported into this segment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Product description and expiry context",
            "text": "The Oracle guide attributes the input to GDI and describes third-party segments used for targeting or avoiding content. It does not establish an executed licence, a GDI-specific default, named advertiser activation or lost revenue. Oracle's August 2024 end-of-life FAQ subsequently included Contextual Intelligence and its integrations in the announced 30 September 2024 service end. The historical guide should therefore not be presented as proof of a current Oracle channel.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
              "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
              "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
              "w32-gdi-e-oracleend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Version3.0 FAQ includes Contextual Intelligence and integrations in30September2024 end-of-life, no new agreements/renewals and end of data-provider relationships. Informational policy, not runtime proof or current GDI delivery.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oracleend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oracle",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced an end to service and supporting access",
            "sourceName": "Oracle",
            "targetName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "date": "Printed FAQ date12August2024; announced service-end30September2024, not independently observed cutover."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Oracle2024 guide says GDI machine learning and expert human review provide high-risk news-website ratings packaged as gi_gdi_pfi. No executed licence, individual activation or GDI-specific default is shown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "supplied ratings described in the Oracle product guide",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "date": "Copyright2024 guide; precise publication/launch date unknown. Metadata May30/June3 is not substituted."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Guide describes third-party segments for targeting or avoiding content. No specific advertiser configuration, bid rejection or revenue loss was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offered a selectable contextual input",
            "sourceName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Oracle packages the branded GDI input for targeting/avoidance. The separate Floor-tier default on PDF3 is not assigned to this different segment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oracle",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offered the GDI contextual segment",
            "sourceName": "Oracle",
            "targetName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "date": "2024 guide snapshot; not current channel proof."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-buyers",
      "label": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Generic recipient role: product users can select contextual exclusions and GDI says licensees retain final purchasing/data-use decisions. No named advertiser activation is established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-buyers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-buyers",
        "name": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Generic recipient role: product users can select contextual exclusions and GDI says licensees retain final purchasing/data-use decisions. No named advertiser activation is established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Generic recipient role: product users can select contextual exclusions and GDI says licensees retain final purchasing/data-use decisions. No named advertiser activation is established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Advertising licensees and buyers are the organisations that receive risk or contextual data and decide how to use it in purchases. The role is generic: the retained records do not identify a particular advertiser activating the cited GDI-derived inputs.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial decision-makers downstream of risk classifications",
        "significance": "A rating's economic effect depends on buyers and intermediaries turning it into a targeting or exclusion setting. This separates the production of information from a decision to withhold spending. It also makes historical product discontinuation important: an old distribution agreement does not establish a current buying practice.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Selection and continuing-use conditions",
            "text": "Oracle's historical segment guide describes third-party data for targeting or avoiding content, and IAS describes customer-selected contextual exclusions. GDI's parliamentary evidence describes commercial licensing while retaining licensees' control over purchasing and data use. Oracle's end-of-life FAQ says any post-service use depends on service descriptions and executed terms, with possible continuing reporting or payment obligations. No named configuration, bid rejection, GDI-specific continuing licence or resulting revenue loss was acquired.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
              "w32-gdi-e-licensedata",
              "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices",
              "w32-gdi-e-priorrights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
              "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GDI FON0071 describes commercial data licensing and charges, while licensees retain purchasing/data-use control. No amount, purchaser contract or actual transfer was acquired; current no-media/platform-funding self-description is not reconciled by this historical account.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-licensedata"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported charging for risk data licensed to buyers",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Post-service use depends on product service descriptions and executed terms; reporting/payment obligations may persist. No GDI-specific continuing use, payment or universal deletion is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-priorrights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oracle",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described conditional rights for previously supplied data",
            "sourceName": "Oracle",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": "2024-08-12 – 2024-08-12"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "IAS describes customers selecting contextual exclusions. This product capability is separate from which customers selected GDI-derived inputs or changed choices after discontinuation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "allows category and risk-level exclusions",
            "sourceName": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Guide describes third-party segments for targeting or avoiding content. No specific advertiser configuration, bid rejection or revenue loss was acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offered a selectable contextual input",
            "sourceName": "Oracle GDI segment gi_gdi_pfi",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-publishers",
      "label": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GDI2024 parliamentary evidence describes publisher ratings appeals. No sampled publisher case, successful appeal or recipient-restoration outcome acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-publishers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-publishers",
        "name": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "GDI2024 parliamentary evidence describes publisher ratings appeals. No sampled publisher case, successful appeal or recipient-restoration outcome acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GDI2024 parliamentary evidence describes publisher ratings appeals. No sampled publisher case, successful appeal or recipient-restoration outcome acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GDI2024 parliamentary evidence describes publisher ratings appeals. No sampled publisher case, successful appeal or recipient-restoration outcome acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Research-output concerns may be raised, but policy1 excludes separately contracted service processing. Personal-data deletion/data-subject rights are not a promise to delete a rating, update all recipients or reverse advertising choices.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provides a representation route without automatic restoration",
            "sourceName": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
            "targetName": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GDI tells Parliament publishers can appeal through a linked form. It reports two-to-three-week review and regular reassessment, not a tested guarantee or presently verified form.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GDI publisher rating review: 2024 description",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "can appeal ratings in the described process",
            "sourceName": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
            "targetName": "GDI publisher rating review: 2024 description",
            "date": "Description dated29April2024; process commencement/end and current operation unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
      "label": "GDI publisher rating review: 2024 description",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "FON0071 describes a linked review form, two-to-three-week review and reassessment. Form, operative criteria and current service guarantee were not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-ratingreview",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
        "name": "GDI publisher rating review: 2024 description",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "FON0071 describes a linked review form, two-to-three-week review and reassessment. Form, operative criteria and current service guarantee were not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FON0071 describes a linked review form, two-to-three-week review and reassessment. Form, operative criteria and current service guarantee were not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FON0071 describes a linked review form, two-to-three-week review and reassessment. Form, operative criteria and current service guarantee were not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GDI describes reassessment and ratings changing as content changes. No independent appeal tier, successful appeal, deletion/update protocol or obligation for a licensee to resume advertising is supplied.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described review and changeable ratings",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "GDI publisher rating review: 2024 description",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GDI tells Parliament publishers can appeal through a linked form. It reports two-to-three-week review and regular reassessment, not a tested guarantee or presently verified form.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "can appeal ratings in the described process",
            "sourceName": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
            "targetName": "GDI publisher rating review: 2024 description",
            "date": "Description dated29April2024; process commencement/end and current operation unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
      "label": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Policy accepts concerns about research outputs and qualified review/clarification/update. Personal-data erasure rights are not automatic domain-rating deletion or recipient-cache replacement duties.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
        "name": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Policy accepts concerns about research outputs and qualified review/clarification/update. Personal-data erasure rights are not automatic domain-rating deletion or recipient-cache replacement duties.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Policy accepts concerns about research outputs and qualified review/clarification/update. Personal-data erasure rights are not automatic domain-rating deletion or recipient-cache replacement duties."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Policy accepts concerns about research outputs and qualified review/clarification/update. Personal-data erasure rights are not automatic domain-rating deletion or recipient-cache replacement duties.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Research-output concerns may be raised, but policy1 excludes separately contracted service processing. Personal-data deletion/data-subject rights are not a promise to delete a rating, update all recipients or reverse advertising choices.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "provides a representation route without automatic restoration",
            "sourceName": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
            "targetName": "Affected publishers: described review standing",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "April2026 policy15/19.3 promises consideration and appropriate review/clarification/update, with a post-publication route where no advance notice. It does not guarantee substantive reversal or numerical complaint deadline.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-researchreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers qualified review of research-output representations",
            "sourceName": "Disinformation Index Ltd (UK)",
            "targetName": "GDI research-output representations: April2026 policy",
            "date": "Policy last updated20April2026; operative start/end not independently established."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-ias",
      "label": "Integral Ad Science",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "IAS describes its own Context Control Avoidance product and discontinuation of limited GDI input. Current wording has December2025 publication and July2026 modification dates; exact cutover unknown.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-ias",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-ias",
        "name": "Integral Ad Science",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "IAS describes its own Context Control Avoidance product and discontinuation of limited GDI input. Current wording has December2025 publication and July2026 modification dates; exact cutover unknown.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "IAS describes its own Context Control Avoidance product and discontinuation of limited GDI input. Current wording has December2025 publication and July2026 modification dates; exact cutover unknown."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "IAS describes its own Context Control Avoidance product and discontinuation of limited GDI input. Current wording has December2025 publication and July2026 modification dates; exact cutover unknown.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "IAS says past GDI use will not affect this solution going forward. This is a product-change account, not observed cache deletion, individual publisher appeal success or independent neutrality finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced discontinuation of the limited GDI input",
            "sourceName": "Integral Ad Science",
            "targetName": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "date": "Published18December2025, modified6July2026; captured September2026 wording may differ from original. Exact implementation date unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
      "label": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Customer-selected contextual exclusions; IAS says it discontinued limited GDI input and past use will not affect this solution going forward. Not tested removal or a publisher appeal result.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-iasproduct",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
        "name": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Customer-selected contextual exclusions; IAS says it discontinued limited GDI input and past use will not affect this solution going forward. Not tested removal or a publisher appeal result.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Customer-selected contextual exclusions; IAS says it discontinued limited GDI input and past use will not affect this solution going forward. Not tested removal or a publisher appeal result."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Customer-selected contextual exclusions; IAS says it discontinued limited GDI input and past use will not affect this solution going forward. Not tested removal or a publisher appeal result.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "IAS says past GDI use will not affect this solution going forward. This is a product-change account, not observed cache deletion, individual publisher appeal success or independent neutrality finding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Integral Ad Science",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced discontinuation of the limited GDI input",
            "sourceName": "Integral Ad Science",
            "targetName": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "date": "Published18December2025, modified6July2026; captured September2026 wording may differ from original. Exact implementation date unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "IAS describes customers selecting contextual exclusions. This product capability is separate from which customers selected GDI-derived inputs or changed choices after discontinuation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "allows category and risk-level exclusions",
            "sourceName": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "targetName": "Advertising licensees and buyers",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "IAS announcement acknowledges past limited GDI input in Context Control Avoidance. Exact fields, start date, customer settings and intermediary contract are not disclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was identified as a limited historical input",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "IAS Context Control Avoidance",
            "date": "Use preceded announced discontinuation; precise interval unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-ohmd",
      "label": "Online Harms Monetisation Dashboard: stated plan",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current GDI About page describes what this product will estimate. No deployed dashboard, live output or equivalence with AI4TRUST decision support is established.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-ohmd",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-ohmd",
        "name": "Online Harms Monetisation Dashboard: stated plan",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Current GDI About page describes what this product will estimate. No deployed dashboard, live output or equivalence with AI4TRUST decision support is established.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current GDI About page describes what this product will estimate. No deployed dashboard, live output or equivalence with AI4TRUST decision support is established."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current GDI About page describes what this product will estimate. No deployed dashboard, live output or equivalence with AI4TRUST decision support is established.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Current About page says the dashboard will estimate open-web/social revenues. No live product or identity with DEL, Oracle segment or AI4TRUST is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-dashboardplan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Us",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes a forthcoming revenue-estimation dashboard",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "Online Harms Monetisation Dashboard: stated plan",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
            "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "label": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Donor answer describes GDI funding outside the US and expected reports/reviews. Selected ledger row and parent programme summary do not identify executed GDI grant/IP terms.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
        "name": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Donor answer describes GDI funding outside the US and expected reports/reviews. Selected ledger row and parent programme summary do not identify executed GDI grant/IP terms.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Donor answer describes GDI funding outside the US and expected reports/reviews. Selected ledger row and parent programme summary do not identify executed GDI grant/IP terms."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office is the UK department whose parliamentary answer and spending records disclose support for GDI. It also appears as a partner in the broader Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme.",
        "structuralRole": "Public donor with separate aggregate and transaction-level disclosures",
        "significance": "FCDO's records connect public resources to GDI's capacity while preserving a distinction between reported funding totals, an invoice line and parent-programme allocations. These views can corroborate a relationship without being additive amounts. They also do not, by themselves, establish donor approval of individual ratings or later commercial uses.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Amounts and accounting boundaries",
            "text": "Written answer 149420 reports £1,999,026 provided between 2019 and 2022 for activities outside the United States and a further £600,797 in the 2022/23 financial-year context. A September 2022 ledger separately lists £130,506 for GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX with a 5 September general-ledger date. That row is not added to the reported totals, its identifier is not treated as a grant number, and its ledger date is not verified bank settlement. Exact recipient-company and executed grant terms remain unresolved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
              },
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
              "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
              "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
              "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Selected September2022 row records GBP130506, GL date5September2022, identifier300,000,130,671,861 line1, supplier GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX, Project Management category. GL date is not verified bank settlement, identifier not grant number, and row not allocated to either parliamentary total. Financial details: value: 130,506; currency: GBP; kind: published ledger/invoice-line amount; period: September2022 ledger; GL date5September Payment status: bank settlement unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ledger"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "records a supplier invoice line with a 5 September 2022 GL date",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "GL accounting date only; preview updated28November2024. Not last-payment proof."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Summary lists FY2022-2023 GBP12million ODA and GBP21.1million non-ODA allocations. GDI is not named; these are not GDI income or demonstrated expenditure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-programmebudget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published programme-level budget allocations",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": "Summary published30January2025; historical budget period, not exact governing2022 bytes."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Retrospectively published summary identifies FCDO and Cabinet Office as programme partners. No GDI-specific grant component is identified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named as a programme partner",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": "Programme April2016-March2023; summary published30January2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Ministerial answer149420 reports GBP1999026 provided between2019 and2022 for activities outside the US. Donor-reported aggregate, not a reconciled ledger or contractual restriction on every later use of knowledge/data. Financial details: value: 1,999,026; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported provided funding; period: between2019 and2022; exact boundaries unknown Payment status: donor-reported provision; individual payments unreconciled Which legal entity: Answer uses GDI name without recipient company identifier.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported providing funding between 2019 and 2022",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Report date24February2023; between2019 and2022 exact period boundaries unspecified."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Same answer reports a further GBP600797 in current financial year2022-2023. Do not add the separately displayed September2022 invoice row as an independent extra transfer. Financial details: value: 600,797; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported further funding; period: FY2022-2023 context Payment status: donor-reported provision; recipient receipt not independently reconciled",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported further funding in the then-current financial year",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "Then-current financial year asof24February2023; exact payment dates not supplied."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
            "title": "FCDO–GDI remit: donor funding and review are documented; reuse rights are not"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-cabinet",
      "label": "UK Cabinet Office: CDMD programme partner",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "2022-2023 retrospective programme summary names Cabinet Office alongside FCDO. No GDI-specific selection, payment or rating instruction inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-cabinet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-cabinet",
        "name": "UK Cabinet Office: CDMD programme partner",
        "role": "Government",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "2022-2023 retrospective programme summary names Cabinet Office alongside FCDO. No GDI-specific selection, payment or rating instruction inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "2022-2023 retrospective programme summary names Cabinet Office alongside FCDO. No GDI-specific selection, payment or rating instruction inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "2022-2023 retrospective programme summary names Cabinet Office alongside FCDO. No GDI-specific selection, payment or rating instruction inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Government",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Generic programme partnership does not establish that Cabinet Office approved a GDI rating or commercial licence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-cabinetpartner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named as a programme partner",
            "sourceName": "UK Cabinet Office: CDMD programme partner",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
            "title": "FCDO–GDI remit: donor funding and review are documented; reuse rights are not"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "label": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "CSSF-05-000006, April2016-March2023 programme. Published2025 summary describes regional/component aims and budget allocations without naming GDI. Programme objectives are not delivered outcomes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "name": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "CSSF-05-000006, April2016-March2023 programme. Published2025 summary describes regional/component aims and budget allocations without naming GDI. Programme objectives are not delivered outcomes.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CSSF-05-000006, April2016-March2023 programme. Published2025 summary describes regional/component aims and budget allocations without naming GDI. Programme objectives are not delivered outcomes."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme, identifier CSSF-05-000006, was a UK programme running from April 2016 to March 2023. Its published summary names FCDO and Cabinet Office partners and work in the Baltic States, Central Europe and Eastern Neighbourhood.",
        "structuralRole": "Parent public programme for regional media and disinformation work",
        "significance": "The programme provides the institutional setting for FCDO's reported GDI support, but its total resources and regional aims do not identify GDI's particular component. Reading the parent programme separately prevents its entire budget from being attributed to one recipient or its objectives from becoming proof of delivered outcomes.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Budget and recipient chronology",
            "text": "The retrospectively published 2022/23 summary lists £12 million of official development assistance and £21.1 million of non-ODA allocations. It does not name GDI. A ministerial answer ties GDI funding to CDMD and activities outside the United States. GDI's later evidence describes work during 2018–2022, no UK-government funding since 2022 and grant expiry in March 2023. Receipt-period and expiry labels can coexist, while the difference from the donor's start-period wording remains unreconciled.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              },
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
              "w32-gdi-e-cabinetpartner",
              "w32-gdi-e-programmebudget",
              "w32-gdi-e-fundedremit",
              "w32-gdi-e-recipientperiod"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
              "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Summary lists FY2022-2023 GBP12million ODA and GBP21.1million non-ODA allocations. GDI is not named; these are not GDI income or demonstrated expenditure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-programmebudget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published programme-level budget allocations",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": "Summary published30January2025; historical budget period, not exact governing2022 bytes."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Retrospectively published summary identifies FCDO and Cabinet Office as programme partners. No GDI-specific grant component is identified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named as a programme partner",
            "sourceName": "Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": "Programme April2016-March2023; summary published30January2025."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Generic programme partnership does not establish that Cabinet Office approved a GDI rating or commercial licence.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-cabinetpartner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Cabinet Office: CDMD programme partner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named as a programme partner",
            "sourceName": "UK Cabinet Office: CDMD programme partner",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "FON0071 says no UK government funding since2022, describes work in2018-2022 and grant expiryMarch2023. Receipt-period and expiry labels can coexist; differences with donor start-period wording remain unreconciled.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-recipientperiod"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              },
              {
                "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "described historical funding and a later grant expiry",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "date": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Donor answer ties GDI support to CDMD and outside-US activities. Generic programme region/strategy cannot locate the GDI component or prove FCDO commissioned later US advertising exclusions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-fundedremit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was identified as supporting outside-US activities",
            "sourceName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Answer says there will have been frequent contact and regular performance reports/reviews. No actual count, reports, instructions or rating-level approval rights were acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-expectedreviews"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "was described as having an expected reporting and review relationship",
            "sourceName": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme",
            "targetName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "date": "2023-02-24 – 2023-02-24"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
            "title": "FCDO–GDI remit: donor funding and review are documented; reuse rights are not",
            "heading": "Programme identity is not the individual grant identity",
            "text": "The official Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023 gives identifier CSSF-05-000006 , a seven-year programme running April 2016–March 2023 , with FCDO and Cabinet Office partners. It identifies the Baltic States, Central Europe and Eastern Neighbourhood as the programme's operating region. Its FY 2022–2023 allocation is GBP 12 million ODA and GBP 21.1 million non-ODA . These are programme allocations; they are not GDI's income, an additional GDI award or demonstrated expenditure.",
            "matched": [
              "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "79e681f5dca4cc3ecd0172ae896ec7ee6730fcb43862cc81ed9560a80c52ae69"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
            "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
            "title": "FCDO–GDI remit: donor funding and review are documented; reuse rights are not"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-gdide",
      "label": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG (German participant)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "CORDIS names GDI GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX GUGHAFTUNGSBESCHRANKT as funded German participant. No ownership/IP-transfer relationship with UK Disinformation Index Ltd, or dated cash ledger, was acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-gdide",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-gdide",
        "name": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG (German participant)",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "CORDIS names GDI GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX GUGHAFTUNGSBESCHRANKT as funded German participant. No ownership/IP-transfer relationship with UK Disinformation Index Ltd, or dated cash ledger, was acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CORDIS names GDI GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX GUGHAFTUNGSBESCHRANKT as funded German participant. No ownership/IP-transfer relationship with UK Disinformation Index Ltd, or dated cash ledger, was acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG is the German legal participant identified in CORDIS for AI4TRUST. Its funded participant entry is distinct from the separately identified UK Disinformation Index Ltd and from non-signing associated partners.",
        "structuralRole": "Named German recipient within a European research consortium",
        "significance": "The legal participant identifies where the published EU contribution is allocated. This matters because a shared organisational brand cannot establish that a UK company received the same money or owns the resulting rights. Funding identity, corporate ownership and intellectual-property transfer need separate records.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Published contribution",
            "text": "CORDIS lists both total cost and net EU contribution of €385,275 for the German participant over the AI4TRUST project interval. This amount sits within the project's €5,950,682.50 aggregate rather than being additional funding. The public entry does not supply dated transfers, an executed accession agreement, a UK guarantee or a corporate-ownership crosswalk.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman",
              "w32-gdi-e-participant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CORDIS German GDI participant entry lists net EU contribution and total cost each EUR385275. The recipient is the German legal participant, not proven UK receipt, subaward or a bank transfer. Financial details: value: 385,275; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU participant contribution; period: AI4TRUST project interval; payout dates unknown Payment status: dated participant cash transfers unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "published a participant contribution of EUR 385275",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG (German participant)",
            "date": "Project1January2023-28February2026; exact participant accession/payment dates not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CORDIS lists the German entity in participant section, distinct from non-signing associated partners. No executed accession, UK guarantee or corporate ownership is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-participant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is listed as a funded participant",
            "sourceName": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG (German participant)",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "Listed against project1January2023-28February2026; actual participant accession/exit dates not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "label": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Horizon research action, EC signature6December2022,1January2023-28February2026, CORDIS closed status as updated17June2026. Identified GDI project overlapping the unnamed2024 Horizon disclosure, not an explicit naming of that disclosure or proof of the only GDI Horizon grant.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "name": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Horizon research action, EC signature6December2022,1January2023-28February2026, CORDIS closed status as updated17June2026. Identified GDI project overlapping the unnamed2024 Horizon disclosure, not an explicit naming of that disclosure or proof of the only GDI Horizon grant.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Horizon research action, EC signature6December2022,1January2023-28February2026, CORDIS closed status as updated17June2026. Identified GDI project overlapping the unnamed2024 Horizon disclosure, not an explicit naming of that disclosure or proof of the only GDI Horizon grant."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 9
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI4TRUST is Horizon research project 101070190, running from 1 January 2023 to 28 February 2026 with Fondazione Bruno Kessler as coordinator. It develops tools for human-supported analysis of online information, with a separately identified German GDI participant.",
        "structuralRole": "Publicly funded research linking existing resources to analytical tools",
        "significance": "The project supplies a concrete knowledge-flow route from contributed lists and research methods into a funded system. That is different from showing deployment in advertising exclusion products. Its public funding, component evaluations and administrative closure each describe a separate aspect of what was built and assessed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and reported outputs",
            "text": "CORDIS lists €5,950,682.50 as the project's net EU contribution; the German GDI participant's €385,275 is included within that aggregate. The final-period report describes an ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with calibration, combining six AI tools for triage and feature attribution, alongside dashboard evaluation by users. A reported textual-signals metric applies to that component rather than the whole system. CORDIS, updated on 17 June 2026, labels the project closed; this does not certify every deliverable or imply that all resulting tools stopped operating.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
              "w32-gdi-e-participant",
              "w32-gdi-e-coordination",
              "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
              "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
              "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
              "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation",
              "w32-gdi-e-reportedclosed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
              "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Design record says planned collection is purpose-limited and consortium interface access depends on data-sharing agreements. Mentioned internal GDI policies and generic NCSR-D/FBK licence guidance are not executed GDI terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-researchdesign"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes purpose-limited collection and agreement-dependent access",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "Submitted1November2023; agreement execution not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CORDIS records EUR5950682.50 project contribution and cost. This is an aggregate project field, not GDI income or a dated payout. The separately displayed German participant contribution is included within this project, not extra funding to add. Financial details: value: 5,950,682.5; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU project contribution; period: project1January2023-28February2026 Payment status: dated transfers unverified",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-ecproject"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "published the whole-project EU contribution",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "Project interval; EC signature6December2022, registry last updated17June2026; not disbursement dates."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Final-period report describes an ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration, combining six AI tools and providing triage categories/feature attribution. Exact inputs, weights, category thresholds and approval rules are not published in this read record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST Disinformation Warning System: reported final method",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports a six-tool calibrated ensemble for triage",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST Disinformation Warning System: reported final method",
            "date": "Report period1March2024-28February2026; updated3August2026, not operational launch date."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The metric applies to the textual signals tool detecting39signals across6tactics/8languages. It is not aggregate warning-system performance or probability a particular claim is false. No benchmark was reproduced.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST textual disinformation-signals component",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports a component-specific weighted F1 of about 56 percent",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST textual disinformation-signals component",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Population includes media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These reported rounds are not an independent Commission audit, actual downstream recipient list or measured advertising effect.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST reported user evaluation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports three evaluation rounds involving 206 users",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST reported user evaluation",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CORDIS updated17June2026 labels the project closed with28February2026 end. This is project administrative status, not a declaration every resulting tool stopped or all final deliverables were accepted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-reportedclosed"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "lists the research project as closed",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Final report describes the named dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It supplies no override, score replacement, reasons, publisher appeal or correction-propagation rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST Human Validation Dashboard",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports an enhanced human-validation dashboard",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST Human Validation Dashboard",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CORDIS lists the German entity in participant section, distinct from non-signing associated partners. No executed accession, UK guarantee or corporate ownership is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-participant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG (German participant)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is listed as a funded participant",
            "sourceName": "GDI Global Disinformation Index gUG (German participant)",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "Listed against project1January2023-28February2026; actual participant accession/exit dates not acquired."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
            "title": "AI4TRUST classification decisions: scoring is described; the decision rules remain partly unavailable"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-fbk",
      "label": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler: AI4TRUST coordinator",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "CORDIS names coordinator; D2.1 modification history records FBK coordinator reviews. Coordination is not proof of Commission acceptance, ownership of all results or unilateral recipient-use authority.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-fbk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-fbk",
        "name": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler: AI4TRUST coordinator",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "CORDIS names coordinator; D2.1 modification history records FBK coordinator reviews. Coordination is not proof of Commission acceptance, ownership of all results or unilateral recipient-use authority.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "CORDIS names coordinator; D2.1 modification history records FBK coordinator reviews. Coordination is not proof of Commission acceptance, ownership of all results or unilateral recipient-use authority."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler is the coordinator named by CORDIS for AI4TRUST and the editor identified in its D2.1 methodological toolbox. The retained documents show project coordination and an internal deliverable-review role.",
        "structuralRole": "Research coordinator and document-review authority",
        "significance": "Coordination links the consortium's work into a shared project and submission process. That is meaningful organisational responsibility, while payment approvals, reserved votes and ownership of results depend on agreements not supplied by the public role label. Internal acceptance also differs from a funder's acceptance of a deliverable.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented responsibilities",
            "text": "CORDIS identifies FBK as coordinator. D2.1 records final coordinator review on 1 November 2023 and labels the document public, with UCAM review, coordinator acceptance and readiness for submission. These are explicit internal document statuses. They do not establish exclusive ownership of all project intellectual property or unilateral authority over how outside recipients use resulting tools.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              },
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-coordination",
              "w32-gdi-e-d21editor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "D2.1 identifies FBK as editor and records final coordinator review on 1 November 2023. PDF2 positively designates PU: Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission in bold. These are internal document designations, not Commission acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-d21editor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "edited and recorded coordinator review before submission",
            "sourceName": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler: AI4TRUST coordinator",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "date": "2023-11-01 – 2023-11-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "CORDIS names Fondazione Bruno Kessler coordinator. Public identity does not disclose consortium reserved votes, payment approvals or exclusive IP ownership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-coordination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is named as project coordinator",
            "sourceName": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler: AI4TRUST coordinator",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "Coordinator listed for project1January2023-28February2026; actual role appointment/exit dates not obtained."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-ucamreview",
      "label": "UCAM: D2.1 quality-assurance role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "D2.1 modification table records designated quality-manager review by UCAM on27October2023. Named document role, not a newly institution-wide control or approval charter.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-ucamreview",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-ucamreview",
        "name": "UCAM: D2.1 quality-assurance role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "D2.1 modification table records designated quality-manager review by UCAM on27October2023. Named document role, not a newly institution-wide control or approval charter.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "D2.1 modification table records designated quality-manager review by UCAM on27October2023. Named document role, not a newly institution-wide control or approval charter."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "D2.1 modification table records designated quality-manager review by UCAM on27October2023. Named document role, not a newly institution-wide control or approval charter.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Modification table version0.6 credits UCAM quality review27October2023. This is internal document review, not a public threshold approval policy or Commission acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is credited with the designated quality-manager review",
            "sourceName": "UCAM: D2.1 quality-assurance role",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "date": "2023-10-27 – 2023-10-27"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "label": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Submitted1November2023; selected design pages, internal review history and later selected seed/annex reading. Sampling, annotation, inference and action remain distinct; no full90page or complete-annex audit.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-d21",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "name": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Submitted1November2023; selected design pages, internal review history and later selected seed/annex reading. Sampling, annotation, inference and action remain distinct; no full90page or complete-annex audit.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Submitted1November2023; selected design pages, internal review history and later selected seed/annex reading. Sampling, annotation, inference and action remain distinct; no full90page or complete-annex audit."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI4TRUST deliverable D2.1, Design of the Methodological Toolbox, is a research-design document submitted on 1 November 2023. It describes sampling, contributed resources, annotation considerations and planned access conditions for the project's analytical work.",
        "structuralRole": "Design record showing how existing information enters research development",
        "significance": "The document exposes a stage before classification outputs become operational decisions. Topic lists help collect and test material; annotation framing can affect how it is described; model thresholds and downstream actions require further choices. Following those stages avoids treating a seed term as a finding against a person or website.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Contributions and review status",
            "text": "D2.1 uses existing GDI lists among research, media and fact-checker inputs, with some ChatGPT suggestions. It describes refinement of broad lists, purpose-limited collection and consortium access dependent on data-sharing agreements. FBK is editor, UCAM is named reviewer, and the document marks coordinator acceptance and readiness for submission. Those internal designations do not establish European Commission acceptance, an executed GDI licence or actual runtime settings. The retained reading covered selected design and annex passages rather than a complete ninety-page audit.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
              "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
              "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
              "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
              "w32-gdi-e-framing",
              "w32-gdi-e-researchdesign"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Selected initial topics and reusable relevance/feasibility criteria guide development/test collection. Neutral topics coexist with charged language; broad lists are refined. Inclusion is not a person/site falsehood finding, automatic sanction list or proven runtime configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-sampling"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST retrieval seeds and sampling frame",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defines a mixed-source collection perimeter",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST retrieval seeds and sampling frame",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "D2.1 identifies FBK as editor and records final coordinator review on 1 November 2023. PDF2 positively designates PU: Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission in bold. These are internal document designations, not Commission acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-d21editor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler: AI4TRUST coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "edited and recorded coordinator review before submission",
            "sourceName": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler: AI4TRUST coordinator",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "date": "2023-11-01 – 2023-11-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "D2.1 explicitly uses existing GDI lists among research, media and fact-checker contributions and some ChatGPT suggestions. No individual seed term is attributed exclusively to GDI, and the report does not establish which legal entity owned each background asset.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "contributed pre-existing keyword resources to the design",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "date": "Submitted1November2023; individual contribution dates unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Design record says planned collection is purpose-limited and consortium interface access depends on data-sharing agreements. Mentioned internal GDI policies and generic NCSR-D/FBK licence guidance are not executed GDI terms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-researchdesign"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "describes purpose-limited collection and agreement-dependent access",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "date": "Submitted1November2023; agreement execution not established."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF58-59 describes attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. The effect on annotation labels, thresholds or coverage remains a question for further records, not an observed exclusion result.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-framing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "D2.1 intersectional methodological framing",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly adopts an intersectional methodological frame",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "targetName": "D2.1 intersectional methodological framing",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Modification table version0.6 credits UCAM quality review27October2023. This is internal document review, not a public threshold approval policy or Commission acceptance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UCAM: D2.1 quality-assurance role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is credited with the designated quality-manager review",
            "sourceName": "UCAM: D2.1 quality-assurance role",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "date": "2023-10-27 – 2023-10-27"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-seeds",
      "label": "AI4TRUST retrieval seeds and sampling frame",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "D2.1 blends research/media/fact-checker input, existing GDI lists and some ChatGPT suggestions. Climate, health and migration terms shape collection; no per-term attribution or falsehood verdict is supplied.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-seeds",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-seeds",
        "name": "AI4TRUST retrieval seeds and sampling frame",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "D2.1 blends research/media/fact-checker input, existing GDI lists and some ChatGPT suggestions. Climate, health and migration terms shape collection; no per-term attribution or falsehood verdict is supplied.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "D2.1 blends research/media/fact-checker input, existing GDI lists and some ChatGPT suggestions. Climate, health and migration terms shape collection; no per-term attribution or falsehood verdict is supplied."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "D2.1 blends research/media/fact-checker input, existing GDI lists and some ChatGPT suggestions. Climate, health and migration terms shape collection; no per-term attribution or falsehood verdict is supplied.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Selected initial topics and reusable relevance/feasibility criteria guide development/test collection. Neutral topics coexist with charged language; broad lists are refined. Inclusion is not a person/site falsehood finding, automatic sanction list or proven runtime configuration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-sampling"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defines a mixed-source collection perimeter",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST retrieval seeds and sampling frame",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-framing",
      "label": "D2.1 intersectional methodological framing",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Selected pages58-59 state attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. This is a design choice; its effect on annotations/thresholds requires rule-level evidence, not an assumed suppression finding.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-framing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-framing",
        "name": "D2.1 intersectional methodological framing",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Selected pages58-59 state attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. This is a design choice; its effect on annotations/thresholds requires rule-level evidence, not an assumed suppression finding.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Selected pages58-59 state attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. This is a design choice; its effect on annotations/thresholds requires rule-level evidence, not an assumed suppression finding."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Selected pages58-59 state attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. This is a design choice; its effect on annotations/thresholds requires rule-level evidence, not an assumed suppression finding.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "PDF58-59 describes attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. The effect on annotation labels, thresholds or coverage remains a question for further records, not an observed exclusion result.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-framing"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
                "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "expressly adopts an intersectional methodological frame",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST D2.1 methodological toolbox",
            "targetName": "D2.1 intersectional methodological framing",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-gdidss",
      "label": "GDI-reported AI4TRUST decision-support contribution",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GDI April2026 retrospective describes a decision-support system within the Monitoring Dashboard, using consortium fact-checker annotations and combined detection signals for human review. Exact crosswalk to commercial products and other component names is not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-gdidss",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-gdidss",
        "name": "GDI-reported AI4TRUST decision-support contribution",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "GDI April2026 retrospective describes a decision-support system within the Monitoring Dashboard, using consortium fact-checker annotations and combined detection signals for human review. Exact crosswalk to commercial products and other component names is not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GDI April2026 retrospective describes a decision-support system within the Monitoring Dashboard, using consortium fact-checker annotations and combined detection signals for human review. Exact crosswalk to commercial products and other component names is not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GDI April2026 retrospective describes a decision-support system within the Monitoring Dashboard, using consortium fact-checker annotations and combined detection signals for human review. Exact crosswalk to commercial products and other component names is not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GDI20April2026 account describes combined signals surfacing risk patterns for human review within the Monitoring Dashboard. This attributed output is not identified as DEL, Oracle, IAS or prospective OHMD; no transfer licence or deployed commercial link is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-dsscontribution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported developing the decision-support contribution",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "GDI-reported AI4TRUST decision-support contribution",
            "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No codebook, final labels or independent sample validity audit is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-annotations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST consortium fact-checker annotations",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "are reported as supplying training annotations",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST consortium fact-checker annotations",
            "targetName": "GDI-reported AI4TRUST decision-support contribution",
            "date": "Reported20April2026; annotation interval unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-factcheckers",
      "label": "AI4TRUST consortium fact-checker annotations",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No annotation codebook, adjudication/override policy or sample correctness audit was acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-factcheckers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-factcheckers",
        "name": "AI4TRUST consortium fact-checker annotations",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No annotation codebook, adjudication/override policy or sample correctness audit was acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No annotation codebook, adjudication/override policy or sample correctness audit was acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No annotation codebook, adjudication/override policy or sample correctness audit was acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No codebook, final labels or independent sample validity audit is acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-annotations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GDI-reported AI4TRUST decision-support contribution",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "are reported as supplying training annotations",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST consortium fact-checker annotations",
            "targetName": "GDI-reported AI4TRUST decision-support contribution",
            "date": "Reported20April2026; annotation interval unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
      "label": "GDI AI4TRUST research-access recommendations",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "April2026 article asks faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and audit access. These are requests, not a grant of rights or confirmed platform compliance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-accessrequests",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
        "name": "GDI AI4TRUST research-access recommendations",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "April2026 article asks faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and audit access. These are requests, not a grant of rights or confirmed platform compliance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "April2026 article asks faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and audit access. These are requests, not a grant of rights or confirmed platform compliance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "April2026 article asks faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and audit access. These are requests, not a grant of rights or confirmed platform compliance.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The retrospective calls for faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and researcher audit access. Recommendations are not an enacted obligation, granted status or awarded API permission.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-requests"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "requests new vetting, compatibility and audit arrangements",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "GDI AI4TRUST research-access recommendations",
            "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GDI asks for platforms to accommodate approved detection tools and audit access. This edge encodes requested behavior only; actual applications/refusals and adopted legal duties were not in this wave.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Very large online platforms: research-access counterpart role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "would require compatibility and audit access if adopted",
            "sourceName": "GDI AI4TRUST research-access recommendations",
            "targetName": "Very large online platforms: research-access counterpart role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-platforms",
      "label": "Very large online platforms: research-access counterpart role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GDI reports access refusals and proposes compatibility/audit obligations. Applications, decisions and adopted obligations are outside these accepted records; no named platform refusal is independently established here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-platforms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-platforms",
        "name": "Very large online platforms: research-access counterpart role",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "GDI reports access refusals and proposes compatibility/audit obligations. Applications, decisions and adopted obligations are outside these accepted records; no named platform refusal is independently established here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GDI reports access refusals and proposes compatibility/audit obligations. Applications, decisions and adopted obligations are outside these accepted records; no named platform refusal is independently established here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GDI reports access refusals and proposes compatibility/audit obligations. Applications, decisions and adopted obligations are outside these accepted records; no named platform refusal is independently established here.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision-making role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GDI asks for platforms to accommodate approved detection tools and audit access. This edge encodes requested behavior only; actual applications/refusals and adopted legal duties were not in this wave.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "GDI AI4TRUST research-access recommendations",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "would require compatibility and audit access if adopted",
            "sourceName": "GDI AI4TRUST research-access recommendations",
            "targetName": "Very large online platforms: research-access counterpart role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article describes platforms frustrating research access, but original applications and responses are not obtained. No independent ruling on those decisions or universal platform behavior is inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-refusalsreported"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported research-access refusals",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "Very large online platforms: research-access counterpart role",
            "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-warning",
      "label": "AI4TRUST Disinformation Warning System: reported final method",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Final-period report describes six-tool outputs combined with LightGBM classifiers and isotonic calibration for triage/feature attribution. Exact inputs, thresholds, approvals, aggregate validation and downstream action rights remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-warning",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-warning",
        "name": "AI4TRUST Disinformation Warning System: reported final method",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Final-period report describes six-tool outputs combined with LightGBM classifiers and isotonic calibration for triage/feature attribution. Exact inputs, thresholds, approvals, aggregate validation and downstream action rights remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Final-period report describes six-tool outputs combined with LightGBM classifiers and isotonic calibration for triage/feature attribution. Exact inputs, thresholds, approvals, aggregate validation and downstream action rights remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Final-period report describes six-tool outputs combined with LightGBM classifiers and isotonic calibration for triage/feature attribution. Exact inputs, thresholds, approvals, aggregate validation and downstream action rights remain not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Final-period report describes an ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration, combining six AI tools and providing triage categories/feature attribution. Exact inputs, weights, category thresholds and approval rules are not published in this read record.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports a six-tool calibrated ensemble for triage",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST Disinformation Warning System: reported final method",
            "date": "Report period1March2024-28February2026; updated3August2026, not operational launch date."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
            "title": "AI4TRUST classification decisions: scoring is described; the decision rules remain partly unavailable"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-textsignals",
      "label": "AI4TRUST textual disinformation-signals component",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Project reports39signals/six tactics/eight languages and about56percent weighted F1 for this component. It is not final warning-system accuracy, falsehood probability or measured advertising impact.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-textsignals",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-textsignals",
        "name": "AI4TRUST textual disinformation-signals component",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Project reports39signals/six tactics/eight languages and about56percent weighted F1 for this component. It is not final warning-system accuracy, falsehood probability or measured advertising impact.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Project reports39signals/six tactics/eight languages and about56percent weighted F1 for this component. It is not final warning-system accuracy, falsehood probability or measured advertising impact."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Project reports39signals/six tactics/eight languages and about56percent weighted F1 for this component. It is not final warning-system accuracy, falsehood probability or measured advertising impact.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The metric applies to the textual signals tool detecting39signals across6tactics/8languages. It is not aggregate warning-system performance or probability a particular claim is false. No benchmark was reproduced.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports a component-specific weighted F1 of about 56 percent",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST textual disinformation-signals component",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
            "title": "AI4TRUST classification decisions: scoring is described; the decision rules remain partly unavailable"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-validation",
      "label": "AI4TRUST Human Validation Dashboard",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Final report names enhanced human validation and iterative evaluation. The component name does not establish human veto, score replacement, public appeal or correction propagation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research resource"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-validation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-validation",
        "name": "AI4TRUST Human Validation Dashboard",
        "role": "Research resource",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Final report names enhanced human validation and iterative evaluation. The component name does not establish human veto, score replacement, public appeal or correction propagation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Final report names enhanced human validation and iterative evaluation. The component name does not establish human veto, score replacement, public appeal or correction propagation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Final report names enhanced human validation and iterative evaluation. The component name does not establish human veto, score replacement, public appeal or correction propagation.",
        "structuralRole": "Research resource",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Final report describes the named dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It supplies no override, score replacement, reasons, publisher appeal or correction-propagation rule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports an enhanced human-validation dashboard",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST Human Validation Dashboard",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
            "title": "AI4TRUST classification decisions: scoring is described; the decision rules remain partly unavailable"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-evaluation",
      "label": "AI4TRUST reported user evaluation",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Final-period report describes three rounds with206users from professional and student populations. Reported participation is not independent model performance or proof of production adoption.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Event"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w32-gdi-evaluation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-evaluation",
        "name": "AI4TRUST reported user evaluation",
        "role": "Event",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Final-period report describes three rounds with206users from professional and student populations. Reported participation is not independent model performance or proof of production adoption.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Final-period report describes three rounds with206users from professional and student populations. Reported participation is not independent model performance or proof of production adoption."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "gdi-rights",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Final-period report describes three rounds with206users from professional and student populations. Reported participation is not independent model performance or proof of production adoption.",
        "structuralRole": "Event",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Population includes media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These reported rounds are not an independent Commission audit, actual downstream recipient list or measured advertising effect.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
                "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports three evaluation rounds involving 206 users",
            "sourceName": "AI4TRUST, grant 101070190",
            "targetName": "AI4TRUST reported user evaluation",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
            "title": "AI4TRUST classification decisions: scoring is described; the decision rules remain partly unavailable"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-dsa",
      "label": "DSA Article40: distinct research-access channels",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Adopted eligibility and access duties. Public-data40(12), vetted40(4) and trusted-flagger22 are separate channels; no GDI qualification inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-dsa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-dsa",
        "name": "DSA Article40: distinct research-access channels",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Adopted eligibility and access duties. Public-data40(12), vetted40(4) and trusted-flagger22 are separate channels; no GDI qualification inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Adopted eligibility and access duties. Public-data40(12), vetted40(4) and trusted-flagger22 are separate channels; no GDI qualification inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Adopted eligibility and access duties. Public-data40(12), vetted40(4) and trusted-flagger22 are separate channels; no GDI qualification inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DSA40(13) authorises delegated technical conditions;2025/2050Article1 specifies paragraph4 researcher-access scope. This is statutory lineage, not uptake of GDI recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-delegationbasis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides the basis for technical data-sharing conditions",
            "sourceName": "DSA Article40: distinct research-access channels",
            "targetName": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-delegated",
      "label": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Operative prerequisites, modality, overview, amendment and delivery-notification rules;80working days is a decision clock with justified extension.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-delegated",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-delegated",
        "name": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Operative prerequisites, modality, overview, amendment and delivery-notification rules;80working days is a decision clock with justified extension.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Operative prerequisites, modality, overview, amendment and delivery-notification rules;80working days is a decision clock with justified extension."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Operative prerequisites, modality, overview, amendment and delivery-notification rules;80working days is a decision clock with justified extension.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published adopted regulation assigns prerequisites, request formulation, access modalities and amendment/delivery records. No named project approval or60-day GDI proposal adoption inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-adoptprocedure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "adopted the project-specific research-access procedures",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DSA40(13) authorises delegated technical conditions;2025/2050Article1 specifies paragraph4 researcher-access scope. This is statutory lineage, not uptake of GDI recommendations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-delegationbasis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA Article40: distinct research-access channels",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides the basis for technical data-sharing conditions",
            "sourceName": "DSA Article40: distinct research-access channels",
            "targetName": "2025/2050: project-specific access procedure",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "label": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Final project-specific vetting/reasoned-request authority, including access conditions and termination after response opportunity. No named actual vetting decision acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-estdsc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "name": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Final project-specific vetting/reasoned-request authority, including access conditions and termination after response opportunity. No named actual vetting decision acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Final project-specific vetting/reasoned-request authority, including access conditions and termination after response opportunity. No named actual vetting decision acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 10
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Digital Services Coordinator in the country where a designated platform provider is established holds the final authority over project-specific researcher vetting under the EU Digital Services Act. This is a statutory office and decision-making role, rather than a particular research organisation or software service.",
        "structuralRole": "Public authority that converts eligible research proposals into enforceable data-access requests",
        "significance": "This office connects a researcher's proposed investigation to the platform's legal duty to supply data. Its choice of data, security arrangements and access conditions determines what an approved project can actually examine; the researcher's home-country coordinator may contribute an initial assessment but does not take the final decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A request with conditions and continuing oversight",
            "text": "Article 40 and Delegated Regulation 2025/2050 provide the operative machinery. The establishment coordinator formulates a reasoned request or explains refusal within 80 working days, subject to a justified extension; the request separately specifies when access should begin. It can prescribe confidentiality safeguards and secure environments, consider a provider's proposed amendments, and consult independent experts. Issued requests receive a public overview, rather than publication of every application or rejection. Continuing eligibility matters: the coordinator can terminate access after investigation and an opportunity for the researcher to respond.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-vetting",
              "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
              "w33-con-e-modalities",
              "w33-con-e-clock",
              "w33-con-e-amend",
              "w33-con-e-mediation",
              "w33-con-e-experts",
              "w33-con-e-publish",
              "w33-con-e-fulfilnotify",
              "w33-con-e-terminate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provider may request within5working days and bears costs. DSC participation is optional, judicial rights preserved; no agreement leaves last DSC decision valid. No mediation exercise acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-mediation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may seek mediation after an amendment decision",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Overview includes research topic, provider, data and modalities, updated for amendments/mediation. It is not an all-applications/rejections register and need not name applicant/funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must publish an overview of an issued reasoned request",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Case-specific security, confidentiality, contracts and optional secure environments constrain access; raw-data transmission and nominated-tool integration are not automatic.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-modalities"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets technical legal and organisational access conditions",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article7 allows a duly justified extension with reasons and new date. Request specifies a separate access-start date;80working days does not promise delivery.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-clock"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must formulate the request or explain refusal within80working days",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provider has15days after receipt and must propose alternatives; DSC decides within15days. Additional information does not displace that decision deadline.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may request amendment on specified access or security grounds",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Experts declare no financial/personal ties, outcome interest or conflict; opinions recorded inAGORA. No expert appointment or payment acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-experts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Independent experts consulted by a DSC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may consult independent impartial experts",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Independent experts consulted by a DSC",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notification and supporting access documentation are distinct from permission or a public overview; no named fulfilment notice acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fulfilnotify"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must notify actual access provision or termination within3working days",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Researcher must be allowed to respond before access termination; no actual named termination or reinstatement record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-terminate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "terminates access if eligibility is lost after investigation",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-homedsc",
      "label": "Research-organisation home DSC — initial assessment",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "May receive application, initially assess and forward; provider-establishment DSC retains final decision.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-homedsc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-homedsc",
        "name": "Research-organisation home DSC — initial assessment",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "May receive application, initially assess and forward; provider-establishment DSC retains final decision.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "May receive application, initially assess and forward; provider-establishment DSC retains final decision."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "May receive application, initially assess and forward; provider-establishment DSC retains final decision.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Home DSC assesses first; final decision expressly remains with establishment DSC.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-homeassessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "forwards application and initial assessment",
            "sourceName": "Research-organisation home DSC — initial assessment",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-vetted",
      "label": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Eligibility includes affiliation, commercial independence, disclosed funding, security, necessity/proportionality and free public results. No named appointment here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-vetted",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-vetted",
        "name": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Eligibility includes affiliation, commercial independence, disclosed funding, security, necessity/proportionality and free public results. No named appointment here.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Eligibility includes affiliation, commercial independence, disclosed funding, security, necessity/proportionality and free public results. No named appointment here."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A vetted researcher is a project-specific status granted under Article 40 of the EU Digital Services Act. It is available only after the competent coordinator assesses eligibility and the proposed research. Institutional prestige, a public grant or participation in a European research programme does not automatically confer it.",
        "structuralRole": "Qualified research recipient of a project-specific statutory access right",
        "significance": "Vetting is the bridge between a proposed public-interest investigation and access to platform-held data. It also places obligations on the recipient, including independence, funding disclosure, secure handling and publication of results. The role therefore carries both an entitlement and continuing accountability for how that entitlement is used.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Eligibility continues after approval",
            "text": "The criteria include affiliation with an eligible research organisation, commercial independence, disclosed funding, adequate security, necessary and proportionate data needs, and freely available public results. Delegated rules specify project funding information and relevant independence declarations; their recital elaborates the identity, amount and nature of funding. The access request determines the data and interface. If eligibility is later lost, the coordinator may terminate access after investigation and an opportunity to respond. No named appointment or termination is established by this role node.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-vetting",
              "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
              "w33-con-e-provide",
              "w33-con-e-terminate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "OperativeArticle8 requires project funding information and relevant commercial-independence declaration. Recital12 describes identity, amount, duration/nature, awarded/pending status and available funder evaluations. No actual declaration read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must demonstrate eligibility and disclose project funding",
            "sourceName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "targetName": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Data and appropriate interface follow the request within its reasonable period. Standard-tool/data-management restrictions that hinder research require explicit request provision; no additional personal-data conditions outside request.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-provide"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must provide access under a reasoned request",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Researcher must be allowed to respond before access termination; no actual named termination or reinstatement record acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-terminate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "terminates access if eligibility is lost after investigation",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article40(8) specifies final eligibility decision; funding or Horizon participation does not itself confer status.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-vetting"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "grants project-specific vetted status when conditions are met",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-providers",
      "label": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Bounded statutory provider duties; this role does not assert that every platform in the wider case has a particular designation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-providers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-providers",
        "name": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Bounded statutory provider duties; this role does not assert that every platform in the wider case has a particular designation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Bounded statutory provider duties; this role does not assert that every platform in the wider case has a particular designation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This role covers providers of services designated as very large online platforms or very large online search engines under the EU Digital Services Act. Such providers hold data needed for research into systemic risks and bear access duties under Article 40.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory data holders responsible for implementing qualifying access requests",
        "significance": "A legal right to study a platform becomes useful only when the provider makes data available through an appropriate interface. Providers therefore sit at the technical implementation point while the legislation limits their ability to add restrictions beyond the reasoned request. Their procedural challenge rights also affect how access is negotiated.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two access channels and a bounded challenge process",
            "text": "For vetted research, the provider must supply access under the coordinator's reasoned request and its timetable. It can seek amendment on specified grounds within 15 days and must offer alternatives; the coordinator then decides within 15 days. Mediation is possible after that decision, but does not automatically displace it. Article 40(12) separately requires qualifying researchers' access to public data without undue delay. Actual provision or termination must be notified to the coordinator within three working days, distinguishing permission from fulfilment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-provide",
              "w33-con-e-amend",
              "w33-con-e-mediation",
              "w33-con-e-fulfilnotify",
              "w33-con-e-publicaccess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Data and appropriate interface follow the request within its reasonable period. Standard-tool/data-management restrictions that hinder research require explicit request provision; no additional personal-data conditions outside request.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-provide"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must provide access under a reasoned request",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provider may request within5working days and bears costs. DSC participation is optional, judicial rights preserved; no agreement leaves last DSC decision valid. No mediation exercise acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-mediation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may seek mediation after an amendment decision",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provider has15days after receipt and must propose alternatives; DSC decides within15days. Additional information does not displace that decision deadline.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-amend"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may request amendment on specified access or security grounds",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "40(12) imports40(8)(b)–(e), including funding disclosure and proportionality, for systemic-risk research. It is separate from paragraph4 project vetting.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicaccess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must give qualifying researchers public-data access without undue delay",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Notification and supporting access documentation are distinct from permission or a public overview; no named fulfilment notice acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fulfilnotify"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must notify actual access provision or termination within3working days",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-request",
      "label": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Specified research, modalities, access-start and termination dates. No actual applicant request acquired; overview and delivery are distinct records.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Administrative instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-request",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-request",
        "name": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
        "role": "Administrative instrument",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Specified research, modalities, access-start and termination dates. No actual applicant request acquired; overview and delivery are distinct records.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Specified research, modalities, access-start and termination dates. No actual applicant request acquired; overview and delivery are distinct records."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Specified research, modalities, access-start and termination dates. No actual applicant request acquired; overview and delivery are distinct records.",
        "structuralRole": "Administrative instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "OperativeArticle8 requires project funding information and relevant commercial-independence declaration. Recital12 describes identity, amount, duration/nature, awarded/pending status and available funder evaluations. No actual declaration read.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must demonstrate eligibility and disclose project funding",
            "sourceName": "Vetted researchers — project-specific role",
            "targetName": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Case-specific security, confidentiality, contracts and optional secure environments constrain access; raw-data transmission and nominated-tool integration are not automatic.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-modalities"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sets technical legal and organisational access conditions",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Article7 allows a duly justified extension with reasons and new date. Request specifies a separate access-start date;80working days does not promise delivery.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-clock"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must formulate the request or explain refusal within80working days",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Reasoned data-access request and conditions",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-portal",
      "label": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Required public overviews do not necessarily name researchers/funders. Retained shell yielded zero overview rows; no absence inference.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-portal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-portal",
        "name": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
        "role": "Infrastructure",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Required public overviews do not necessarily name researchers/funders. Retained shell yielded zero overview rows; no absence inference.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Required public overviews do not necessarily name researchers/funders. Retained shell yielded zero overview rows; no absence inference."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
            "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission FAQ — researcher access",
            "url": "https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/news/faqs-dsa-data-access-researchers-2025-07-03_en"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings",
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Required public overviews do not necessarily name researchers/funders. Retained shell yielded zero overview rows; no absence inference.",
        "structuralRole": "Infrastructure",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Overview includes research topic, provider, data and modalities, updated for amendments/mediation. It is not an all-applications/rejections register and need not name applicant/funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must publish an overview of an issued reasoned request",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Article3 assigns hosting and workflow functions. The captured shell is not evidence the register has no rows or requires login for public overviews.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-portalhost"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
                "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must establish and host the portal",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "DSA data-access portal — public overview channel",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
            "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission FAQ — researcher access",
            "url": "https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/news/faqs-dsa-data-access-researchers-2025-07-03_en"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings",
            "title": "DSA research access: the decision-maker is identifiable; a GDI approval is not established"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-publicresearch",
      "label": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Qualifying researchers, including nonprofit affiliations, obtain public-data access without the paragraph4 vetting route; purpose and40(8)(b)–(e) conditions remain.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-publicresearch",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-publicresearch",
        "name": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Qualifying researchers, including nonprofit affiliations, obtain public-data access without the paragraph4 vetting route; purpose and40(8)(b)–(e) conditions remain.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Qualifying researchers, including nonprofit affiliations, obtain public-data access without the paragraph4 vetting route; purpose and40(8)(b)–(e) conditions remain."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Qualifying researchers, including nonprofit affiliations, obtain public-data access without the paragraph4 vetting route; purpose and40(8)(b)–(e) conditions remain.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Trained staff and internal SOP required. Approval is conditional; custom deployment expected within7business days except complex development. No automatic approval/delivery inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-assessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must assess eligibility within15business days",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "targetName": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "40(12) imports40(8)(b)–(e), including funding disclosure and proportionality, for systemic-risk research. It is separate from paragraph4 project vetting.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicaccess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must give qualifying researchers public-data access without undue delay",
            "sourceName": "DSA designated VLOP/VLOSE data-provider role",
            "targetName": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-experts",
      "label": "Independent experts consulted by a DSC",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Optional expert consultation with impartiality/conflict declarations and AGORA record; no named engagement or donor approval inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-experts",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-experts",
        "name": "Independent experts consulted by a DSC",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Optional expert consultation with impartiality/conflict declarations and AGORA record; no named engagement or donor approval inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Optional expert consultation with impartiality/conflict declarations and AGORA record; no named engagement or donor approval inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Optional expert consultation with impartiality/conflict declarations and AGORA record; no named engagement or donor approval inferred.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Experts declare no financial/personal ties, outcome interest or conflict; opinions recorded inAGORA. No expert appointment or payment acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-experts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may consult independent impartial experts",
            "sourceName": "Provider-establishment Digital Services Coordinator",
            "targetName": "Independent experts consulted by a DSC",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-flaggerdsc",
      "label": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Separate Article22 awarding/suspension/revocation jurisdiction, not the researcher-provider establishment rule.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-flaggerdsc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-flaggerdsc",
        "name": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Separate Article22 awarding/suspension/revocation jurisdiction, not the researcher-provider establishment rule.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate Article22 awarding/suspension/revocation jurisdiction, not the researcher-provider establishment rule."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate Article22 awarding/suspension/revocation jurisdiction, not the researcher-provider establishment rule.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Insufficiently precise/inaccurate notices can trigger investigation/suspension; revocation requires findings and response opportunity. Annual reports and independence explanation are separately required.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-flagreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must suspend or revoke when specified evidentiary conditions are met",
            "sourceName": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
            "targetName": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Applicant-establishment DSC decides; no GDI or other named flagger approval inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-flagaward"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "awards status on demonstrated expertise independence and diligent work",
            "sourceName": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
            "targetName": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-flagger",
      "label": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Priority processing of qualified illegal-content notices, with independence/reporting/review obligations; each notice is not a binding removal order.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory status"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-flagger",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-flagger",
        "name": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
        "role": "Statutory status",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Priority processing of qualified illegal-content notices, with independence/reporting/review obligations; each notice is not a binding removal order.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Priority processing of qualified illegal-content notices, with independence/reporting/review obligations; each notice is not a binding removal order."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Priority processing of qualified illegal-content notices, with independence/reporting/review obligations; each notice is not a binding removal order.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory status",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Insufficiently precise/inaccurate notices can trigger investigation/suspension; revocation requires findings and response opportunity. Annual reports and independence explanation are separately required.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-flagreview"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must suspend or revoke when specified evidentiary conditions are met",
            "sourceName": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
            "targetName": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Necessary priority/undue-delay processing is required, but platform decision on each notice remains; status is not automatic takedown authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online-platform providers — Article22 notice role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "receives priority processing for notices within designated expertise",
            "sourceName": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "targetName": "Online-platform providers — Article22 notice role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Applicant-establishment DSC decides; no GDI or other named flagger approval inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-flagaward"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "awards status on demonstrated expertise independence and diligent work",
            "sourceName": "Applicant-establishment DSC — trusted-flagger role",
            "targetName": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Two other legal channels must remain distinct. Article40(12) covers publicly accessible platform data for researchers satisfying conditions8(b)-(e), without the paragraph4 project-specific vetted route. Article22 trusted-flagger status separately gives priority processing of illegal-content notices within an expertise area, with reporting, suspension and revocation rules. It does not make each notice a binding removal command. No status under either channel is inferred for GDI.",
            "matched": [
              "Article22 trusted-flagger status"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4dd4a9d7ae5d47ab6961d7302039e32724cda0b2297d46edb72068d365881eb4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-noticeproviders",
      "label": "Online-platform providers — Article22 notice role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Article22 applies to online platforms; distinct from the VLOP/VLOSE Article40 data-provider role.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-noticeproviders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-noticeproviders",
        "name": "Online-platform providers — Article22 notice role",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Article22 applies to online platforms; distinct from the VLOP/VLOSE Article40 data-provider role.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Article22 applies to online platforms; distinct from the VLOP/VLOSE Article40 data-provider role."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Article22 applies to online platforms; distinct from the VLOP/VLOSE Article40 data-provider role.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Necessary priority/undue-delay processing is required, but platform decision on each notice remains; status is not automatic takedown authority.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-priority"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "receives priority processing for notices within designated expertise",
            "sourceName": "Article22 trusted-flagger status",
            "targetName": "Online-platform providers — Article22 notice role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
            "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-ali",
      "label": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Covered service; commitments address Netherlands and Singapore legal parties. No applicant identity or use of its API is inferred.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Service"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-ali",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-ali",
        "name": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
        "role": "Service",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Covered service; commitments address Netherlands and Singapore legal parties. No applicant identity or use of its API is inferred.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Covered service; commitments address Netherlands and Singapore legal parties. No applicant identity or use of its API is inferred."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
            "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AliExpress is the online marketplace service examined in the retained EU Digital Services Act proceedings. Its research-access commitments govern a process for qualifying researchers to obtain publicly available platform data. The service must be distinguished from the Netherlands and Singapore legal entities addressed by the decision.",
        "structuralRole": "Marketplace subject to binding public-data access commitments and external monitoring",
        "significance": "AliExpress makes the access chain concrete: researchers need usable data, staff process eligibility, technical systems provide downloads or interfaces, an external trustee monitors commitments, and the Commission retains enforcement authority. Each step has a different actor and proof requirement, so an obligation or approved monitor does not establish successful data delivery.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the commitments require",
            "text": "The 18 June 2025 decision makes public-data access commitments under Article 40(12) binding. They include trained assessment staff, an eligibility assessment within 15 business days, machine-readable downloads, appropriate near-real-time interface data, and recurring quality checks. These concern the public-data channel, distinct from project-specific vetted access to non-public data. A separate official announcement on 20 July 2026 described a EUR550 million fine concerning illegal-product risk assessment and mitigation. That announced fine is neither an observed payment nor evidence of a research-access breach.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              },
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
                "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-commitservice",
              "w33-con-e-assessment",
              "w33-con-e-qa",
              "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
              "w33-con-e-monitor",
              "w33-con-e-fine",
              "w33-con-e-aliprovider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
              "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
              "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Trustee may recommend measures and promptly report reasonably concluded failure; cannot make product/business/technical decisions or exercise Commission investigative powers. Change notice is not prior approval; experimental changes excepted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-monitor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must monitor and report without business decision powers",
            "sourceName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Provider proposes candidate/mandate and pays fees independent of results. No executed fee schedule, amount, invoice or payment acquired. Commission approval remains separate. Payment status: Obligation; actual paid amount unknown",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-nominatepay"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must fund the approved trustee on noncontingent terms",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AnnexB.V concerns40(12), not named vetted40(4) access. Portal/dataset instructions, machine-readable downloads and near-real-time readily availableAPI data required; no live verification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-commitservice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires a qualifying-public-data access process",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": "Full obligations after30September2025 initial implementation; effective receipt date not obtained."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Trained staff and internal SOP required. Approval is conditional; custom deployment expected within7business days except complex development. No automatic approval/delivery inference.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-assessment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must assess eligibility within15business days",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "targetName": "Public-data researchers under40(12)",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Quarterly retrieval/reconciliation/API tests and semiannual reporting are duties, not test results.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-qa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must monitor API accuracy stability and processing metrics",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "targetName": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "20July2026official French announcement addresses assessment/mitigation of illegal/dangerous/counterfeit products, separate from2025settled access commitments. Full decision, appeal and payment not obtained; action plan due20October2026. Financial details: value: 550,000,000; currency: EUR; kind: announced administrative fine; not observed payment; period: 20July2026announcement Payment status: Unknown; not an access-related fine",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fine"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
                "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced a separate EUR550million illegal-product-risk fine",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": "2026-07-20"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public table platform identification only; no established recipient organisation, application merits or delivery date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-aliprovider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "names the platform counterpart",
            "sourceName": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
            "title": "A binding access obligation is not a proven delivery",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The current official platform index identifies AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V., links the18June2025 decision and trustee record, and lists a20July2026 EUR550million fine. The index's content says updated31August2026 while the footer says7September2026; neither is the date of each legal event. Reading here was limited to AliExpress's actual entry, document links and those date fields. No full platform register audit.",
            "matched": [
              "AliExpress"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6c85cdf76ff3ea8cb5ab92a56b95b47313f0570f8c9032a4af88f372978c403b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor",
            "heading": "Fulfilment and enforcement boundary",
            "text": "Recital 9 (PDF 6) describes pre-decision changes to AliExpress' transparency tools, including research-access options and downloads. This is an official historical implementation account, not an audit that every annex obligation was satisfied. The trustee approval provides a further concrete implementation step. No actual application decision, data delivery, QA report, trustee report or Commission acceptance of performance was acquired.",
            "matched": [
              "AliExpress"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "79fcbbc78d3c4cc51af82a20990bd1a453e5b9d8fc3a1b4befb6951601a7e0fd"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records",
            "heading": "Current observations and their denominator",
            "text": "The platform table lists one AliExpress public-data application as open . It discloses no submission date, applicant, requested fields, response, paragraph, cure or subsequent outcome. No GDI identity is established. Public-data labelling alone is insufficient to reconstruct the actual legal channel used. This current entry cannot be matched to the confidential population in the separate FTI audit ending June 2025 or treated as a contradiction of that audit's report of no approved applications.",
            "matched": [
              "AliExpress"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b2e8c50aa556de05d8256e66a80bfc53b36a1fba5c6ed265f3c0ca2f23af032b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor",
            "heading": "Appointment and limits of the monitor",
            "text": "The authority allocation is unusually explicit. AliExpress proposes the trustee/mandate and pays fees that must not depend on monitoring results; the Commission approves or rejects, may modify the mandate, and may issue orders/instructions to ensure compliance (C.1–5, PDF 74–75). Independence includes a 12-month restriction on related non-monitoring services before and after, and a limit on prior consecutive monitoring service; ordinary Article 37 audit service is distinguished. No separate independence assessment or executed remuneration terms were acquired.",
            "matched": [
              "AliExpress"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "437afb4605752ea9b2c95773425383e0bd9d8ae73feb960d43c122b1992809fe"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
            "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
            "title": "A binding access obligation is not a proven delivery"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-alinl",
      "label": "AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Exact Article3 addressee of the18June2025 decision. No parent/successor identity substitution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-alinl",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-alinl",
        "name": "AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Exact Article3 addressee of the18June2025 decision. No parent/successor identity substitution.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exact Article3 addressee of the18June2025 decision. No parent/successor identity substitution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Exact Article3 addressee of the18June2025 decision. No parent/successor identity substitution.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Actual18June2025Article71 act; access commitments settle covered proceedings without an Article40 infringement adjudication or admission.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bindnl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.",
            "date": "2025-06-18"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
            "title": "A binding access obligation is not a proven delivery",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The current official platform index identifies AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V., links the18June2025 decision and trustee record, and lists a20July2026 EUR550million fine. The index's content says updated31August2026 while the footer says7September2026; neither is the date of each legal event. Reading here was limited to AliExpress's actual entry, document links and those date fields. No full platform register audit.",
            "matched": [
              "AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V."
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6c85cdf76ff3ea8cb5ab92a56b95b47313f0570f8c9032a4af88f372978c403b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-alisg",
      "label": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Exact decision addressee and reported audit-engaging provider; different from a prospective successor mentioned in procedural history.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-alisg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-alisg",
        "name": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Exact decision addressee and reported audit-engaging provider; different from a prospective successor mentioned in procedural history.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Exact decision addressee and reported audit-engaging provider; different from a prospective successor mentioned in procedural history."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited is an exact legal addressee of the Commission's AliExpress commitment decision and the provider identified as engaging the 2024/25 audit firm. Naming this company preserves the legal counterparty behind the marketplace brand.",
        "structuralRole": "Named AliExpress legal counterparty for commitments and audit engagement",
        "significance": "Platform-level discussion can hide which company owes a duty or buys an assurance service. This entity links the binding decision to the reported auditor engagement, making the obligations traceable without treating every Alibaba company or a prospective successor as the same contracting party.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Decision addressee and audit customer",
            "text": "The Commission's 18 June 2025 decision binds the named Singapore company within the same commitment package as the other addressee; it is not a second financial transfer or separate sanction. The provider's implementation report identifies FTI Consulting LLP as its 2024/25 auditor. It records audit work from 5 May to 29 August 2025 and adoption on 29 August. Those statements identify a professional engagement and reporting period, while leaving the engagement terms and paid fee undisclosed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bindsg",
              "w33-con-e-engagefti"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
              "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Same decision and obligation family, not a second transfer or independent sanction. ExactSingaporeE-commercePrivateLimited name preserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bindsg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
            "date": "2025-06-18"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provider implementationPDF4 identifies FTIConsultingLLP; auditwork5May–29August2025, adoption29August. Engagement terms and actual paid amount not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-engagefti"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported engaging FTI for the2024/25 audit",
            "sourceName": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
            "targetName": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
            "date": "2025-08-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
            "title": "A positive audit with no approved public-data requests"
          },
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-commitments",
      "label": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Public edited Article71 decision; public-data accessB.V and monitoringC. Receipt-based effective term unknown; access suspicions not adjudicated infringement/non-admission retained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Policy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-commitments",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-commitments",
        "name": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
        "role": "Policy",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Public edited Article71 decision; public-data accessB.V and monitoringC. Receipt-based effective term unknown; access suspicions not adjudicated infringement/non-admission retained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Public edited Article71 decision; public-data accessB.V and monitoringC. Receipt-based effective term unknown; access suspicions not adjudicated infringement/non-admission retained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public edited Article71 decision; public-data accessB.V and monitoringC. Receipt-based effective term unknown; access suspicions not adjudicated infringement/non-admission retained.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Effective date is receipt, not obtained. Trustee mandate to final2027cycle report, substantive measures5years. C.9 typo and recital174/AnnexD monitoring-lapse tension preserved; ordinaryArticle37audits distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-reportscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura monitoring reports and approved mandate — expected records",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defines reporting cycles separate from five-year substantive term",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
            "targetName": "Ankura monitoring reports and approved mandate — expected records",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AnnexB.V concerns40(12), not named vetted40(4) access. Portal/dataset instructions, machine-readable downloads and near-real-time readily availableAPI data required; no live verification.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-commitservice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "requires a qualifying-public-data access process",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": "Full obligations after30September2025 initial implementation; effective receipt date not obtained."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-ankura",
      "label": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Commission approval23September2025 establishes named monitoring role; mandate, paid fee and actual delivered reports not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-ankura",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-ankura",
        "name": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Commission approval23September2025 establishes named monitoring role; mandate, paid fee and actual delivered reports not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Commission approval23September2025 establishes named monitoring role; mandate, paid fee and actual delivered reports not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 8
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited is the firm approved by the European Commission on 23 September 2025 to monitor AliExpress's binding commitments. Its position is that of an external monitoring trustee: it examines compliance and reports to the Commission under an arrangement the platform is required to fund.",
        "structuralRole": "Commission-approved monitor of AliExpress commitments",
        "significance": "The trustee adds an observation and reporting layer between a commercial platform and its regulator. AliExpress proposes the monitor and must pay its fees, but Commission approval, mandate control and replacement powers constrain that relationship. The arrangement creates a route for compliance concerns to reach the authority without transferring platform management to the consultant.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Monitoring powers and reporting obligations",
            "text": "The commitments require fees independent of monitoring results and impose independence conditions. Ankura may recommend corrective measures and promptly report a reasonably concluded failure, but cannot make AliExpress's business, product or technical decisions or exercise the Commission's investigative powers. The framework allows exchanges with the statutory auditor to reduce duplicate requests. Approval establishes the appointment, not the delivery of monitoring reports or payment of a known fee. The acquired record contains no executed remuneration schedule, delivered report or Commission acceptance of performance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
              "w33-con-e-approveankura",
              "w33-con-e-mandate",
              "w33-con-e-monitor",
              "w33-con-e-qareport",
              "w33-con-e-trustreport",
              "w33-con-e-toauditor",
              "w33-con-e-fromauditor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Trustee may recommend measures and promptly report reasonably concluded failure; cannot make product/business/technical decisions or exercise Commission investigative powers. Change notice is not prior approval; experimental changes excepted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-monitor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must monitor and report without business decision powers",
            "sourceName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Provider proposes candidate/mandate and pays fees independent of results. No executed fee schedule, amount, invoice or payment acquired. Commission approval remains separate. Payment status: Obligation; actual paid amount unknown",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-nominatepay"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must fund the approved trustee on noncontingent terms",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "First cycle ends30September2025, first report due within2months; later cycles endSeptember2026/2027. Company copy may remove third-party confidential material. No actual receipt/report/response acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-trustreport"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must submit monitoring reports and promptly flag concluded failure",
            "sourceName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "targetName": "European Commission",
            "date": "C.9 prints impossible31November2027;recital16730November/C.12 two months.2026cycle not yet ended9September2026; no silent correction."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Received/processed/approved/rejected metrics and feedback required; no actual report acquired. Recital174 ongoingQA expectation and AnnexD broader lapse wording remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-qareport"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must send semiannual access counts tests and feedback",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Commission may reject/modify mandate and issue compliance instructions; replacement/discharge/hand-over governedC.7–8. No exercised instruction/replacement acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-mandate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approves mandate and may instruct or replace the trustee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Trustee may ask auditor and rely on/incorporate material; AliExpress takes reasonably required steps. A permitted route, not an actual request or transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fromauditor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may supply already collected evidence to reduce repeated requests",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official notice records23September2025approval; no report delivery, performance approval or fee payment established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-approveankura"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "approved the named monitoring trustee",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": "2025-09-23"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "C.14 provides auditor access at its request; no observed exchange or researcher/public disclosure follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-toauditor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must permit relevant trustee-document access on auditor request",
            "sourceName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "targetName": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-legalteam",
      "label": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "FTI describes tracked SOP eligibility/clarification decisions managed by Legal during evaluation1July2024–30June2025. No current-policy backdating or own test.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operational role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-legalteam",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-legalteam",
        "name": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
        "role": "Operational role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "FTI describes tracked SOP eligibility/clarification decisions managed by Legal during evaluation1July2024–30June2025. No current-policy backdating or own test.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "FTI describes tracked SOP eligibility/clarification decisions managed by Legal during evaluation1July2024–30June2025. No current-policy backdating or own test."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FTI describes tracked SOP eligibility/clarification decisions managed by Legal during evaluation1July2024–30June2025. No current-policy backdating or own test.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SOP covers evaluation/amendment/communication; staff use40(8)(b)–(e), standardized replies. Approved dashboard/API datasets described conditionally. SOP and application files not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-legalprocess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes Legal-managed eligibility and clarification workflow",
            "sourceName": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "targetName": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated audit-period account; no current2026 terms inferred. Clarification capability is not evidence each applicant received a fair cure opportunity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-staffdecisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported as managing the tracked review process",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
            "targetName": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
            "title": "A positive audit with no approved public-data requests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-qa",
      "label": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "B.V.6–7 specifies metrics, quarterly technical tests and semiannual material to trustee. Actual reports and continuing-duration interpretation remain not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Operational role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-qa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-qa",
        "name": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
        "role": "Operational role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "B.V.6–7 specifies metrics, quarterly technical tests and semiannual material to trustee. Actual reports and continuing-duration interpretation remain not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "B.V.6–7 specifies metrics, quarterly technical tests and semiannual material to trustee. Actual reports and continuing-duration interpretation remain not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "B.V.6–7 specifies metrics, quarterly technical tests and semiannual material to trustee. Actual reports and continuing-duration interpretation remain not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Operational role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Received/processed/approved/rejected metrics and feedback required; no actual report acquired. Recital174 ongoingQA expectation and AnnexD broader lapse wording remain unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-qareport"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must send semiannual access counts tests and feedback",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Quarterly retrieval/reconciliation/API tests and semiannual reporting are duties, not test results.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-qa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must monitor API accuracy stability and processing metrics",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "targetName": "AliExpress internal access QA/reporting",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-trustreport",
      "label": "Ankura monitoring reports and approved mandate — expected records",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Workplan/initial report/follow-up response are required or expected but not acquired. Private delivery is plausible; absence from main-activity index proves no failure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Record family"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-trustreport",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-trustreport",
        "name": "Ankura monitoring reports and approved mandate — expected records",
        "role": "Record family",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Workplan/initial report/follow-up response are required or expected but not acquired. Private delivery is plausible; absence from main-activity index proves no failure.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Workplan/initial report/follow-up response are required or expected but not acquired. Private delivery is plausible; absence from main-activity index proves no failure."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Workplan/initial report/follow-up response are required or expected but not acquired. Private delivery is plausible; absence from main-activity index proves no failure.",
        "structuralRole": "Record family",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Effective date is receipt, not obtained. Trustee mandate to final2027cycle report, substantive measures5years. C.9 typo and recital174/AnnexD monitoring-lapse tension preserved; ordinaryArticle37audits distinct.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-reportscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "defines reporting cycles separate from five-year substantive term",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress binding commitments — C(2025)3982",
            "targetName": "Ankura monitoring reports and approved mandate — expected records",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-auditrole",
      "label": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Role with permitted two-way trustee evidence sharing; not assumed to be FTI for every future audit or the Ankura monitoring role.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Statutory role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-auditrole",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-auditrole",
        "name": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
        "role": "Statutory role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Role with permitted two-way trustee evidence sharing; not assumed to be FTI for every future audit or the Ankura monitoring role.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Role with permitted two-way trustee evidence sharing; not assumed to be FTI for every future audit or the Ankura monitoring role."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Role with permitted two-way trustee evidence sharing; not assumed to be FTI for every future audit or the Ankura monitoring role.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory role",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Trustee may ask auditor and rely on/incorporate material; AliExpress takes reasonably required steps. A permitted route, not an actual request or transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-fromauditor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "may supply already collected evidence to reduce repeated requests",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
            "targetName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "C.14 provides auditor access at its request; no observed exchange or researcher/public disclosure follows.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-toauditor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "must permit relevant trustee-document access on auditor request",
            "sourceName": "Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited",
            "targetName": "AliExpress Article37 auditor — role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
            "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-fti",
      "label": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Implementation report identifies provider engagement; exact LLP, not generic FTI-branded group. Fees/independence are report declarations, not engagement or payment records.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-fti",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-fti",
        "name": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Implementation report identifies provider engagement; exact LLP, not generic FTI-branded group. Fees/independence are report declarations, not engagement or payment records.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Implementation report identifies provider engagement; exact LLP, not generic FTI-branded group. Fees/independence are report declarations, not engagement or payment records."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FTI Consulting LLP is the specific audit firm identified in AliExpress's 2024/25 Digital Services Act implementation report. The retained material concerns its Article 37 audit and selected findings about the platform's readiness to provide qualifying researchers with public-data access.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory audit provider assessing AliExpress research-access readiness",
        "significance": "FTI supplies an assurance judgment that the platform and regulators can use alongside other compliance evidence. Its audit opinion sits at a different point from the Commission-appointed trustee's continuing monitoring, and from a researcher's actual receipt of data. Understanding that distinction explains why apparently positive compliance evidence can coexist with incomplete application records.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the audit opinion covers",
            "text": "The implementation report records work between 5 May and 29 August 2025, with adoption on 29 August. For Article 40(12), the auditor reached a positive conclusion about intention and capability and made no recommendation, using documents, attestations, interviews and substantive tests of the electronic process. This is more than a platform promise, but it is not a publicly replicated test of every application or subsequent delivery. Fee and independence statements remain report declarations rather than acquired engagement or payment records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-engagefti",
              "w33-con-e-ftiopinion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Auditor concludes intention/capability and no recommendation, supported by documents/attestations/interviews and substantive electronic-process tests. No fresh replication/workpaper audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-ftiopinion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "issued a positive40(12) readiness conclusion",
            "sourceName": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
            "targetName": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provider implementationPDF4 identifies FTIConsultingLLP; auditwork5May–29August2025, adoption29August. Engagement terms and actual paid amount not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-engagefti"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reported engaging FTI for the2024/25 audit",
            "sourceName": "Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited",
            "targetName": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
            "date": "2025-08-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
            "title": "A positive audit with no approved public-data requests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
      "label": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Positive intention/capability conclusion with no recommendation; no approved applications and all inspected applications judged incomplete/invalid coexist. Evaluation1July2024–30June2025, not laterAnkura performance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Evaluation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-ftiaudit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
        "name": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
        "role": "Evaluation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Positive intention/capability conclusion with no recommendation; no approved applications and all inspected applications judged incomplete/invalid coexist. Evaluation1July2024–30June2025, not laterAnkura performance.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Positive intention/capability conclusion with no recommendation; no approved applications and all inspected applications judged incomplete/invalid coexist. Evaluation1July2024–30June2025, not laterAnkura performance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Positive intention/capability conclusion with no recommendation; no approved applications and all inspected applications judged incomplete/invalid coexist. Evaluation1July2024–30June2025, not laterAnkura performance.",
        "structuralRole": "Evaluation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Request count redacted. FTI expressly says it inspected all applications against submitted information, not merely zero approvals. Public record establishes neither wrongful refusals nor delivered access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-noapprovals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports zero approvals and all inspected applications incomplete or invalid",
            "sourceName": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "targetName": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Auditor concludes intention/capability and no recommendation, supported by documents/attestations/interviews and substantive electronic-process tests. No fresh replication/workpaper audit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-ftiopinion"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "issued a positive40(12) readiness conclusion",
            "sourceName": "FTI Consulting LLP —2024/25 audit firm",
            "targetName": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SOP covers evaluation/amendment/communication; staff use40(8)(b)–(e), standardized replies. Approved dashboard/API datasets described conditionally. SOP and application files not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-legalprocess"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "describes Legal-managed eligibility and clarification workflow",
            "sourceName": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "targetName": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
            "title": "A positive audit with no approved public-data requests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-appcohort",
      "label": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Count confidential. FTI says it inspected all and found incomplete/invalid submissions; no originals, identities or cure exchanges available. No GDI or current tracker join.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported population"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-appcohort",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-appcohort",
        "name": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
        "role": "Reported population",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Count confidential. FTI says it inspected all and found incomplete/invalid submissions; no originals, identities or cure exchanges available. No GDI or current tracker join.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Count confidential. FTI says it inspected all and found incomplete/invalid submissions; no originals, identities or cure exchanges available. No GDI or current tracker join."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Count confidential. FTI says it inspected all and found incomplete/invalid submissions; no originals, identities or cure exchanges available. No GDI or current tracker join.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported population",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Request count redacted. FTI expressly says it inspected all applications against submitted information, not merely zero approvals. Public record establishes neither wrongful refusals nor delivered access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-noapprovals"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports zero approvals and all inspected applications incomplete or invalid",
            "sourceName": "FTI2024/25 Article40(12) audit opinion",
            "targetName": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Dated audit-period account; no current2026 terms inferred. Clarification capability is not evidence each applicant received a fair cure opportunity.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-staffdecisions"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is reported as managing the tracked review process",
            "sourceName": "AliExpress Legal team — application process role",
            "targetName": "AliExpress2024/25 public-data applications — redacted audit cohort",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
            "title": "A positive audit with no approved public-data requests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-collab",
      "label": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Author-led research/support initiative gathering voluntary application reports and informing regulation. Not a regulator, random sample or registry of every platform request.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Initiative"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-collab",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-collab",
        "name": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
        "role": "Initiative",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Author-led research/support initiative gathering voluntary application reports and informing regulation. Not a regulator, random sample or registry of every platform request.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Author-led research/support initiative gathering voluntary application reports and informing regulation. Not a regulator, random sample or registry of every platform request."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory is a research and support initiative studying how researchers obtain platform data under the Digital Services Act. It gathers voluntary application experiences, offers help with applications, publishes tracker summaries and contributes to policy discussion about access barriers.",
        "structuralRole": "Intermediary translating researcher experience into application support and policy evidence",
        "significance": "The Collaboratory connects otherwise isolated applicants and turns recurring problems into visible policy questions. That makes it a consequential source of researcher-side evidence. Some authors of its associated study also lead the initiative, so its publications combine participant experience, service provision and a stated case for improving access.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Research, support and disclosed funding",
            "text": "The September 2025 Weizenbaum policy paper describes Mercator Stiftung funding for the joint project since early 2024, without a disclosed grant amount or donor veto. The current tracker was updated on 8 September 2026. Its recruitment is voluntary and no complete set of original platform decisions accompanies the public summary. A Global Disinformation Index article links readers to the Collaboratory; the link establishes a public referral, not membership, funding or the identity of any AliExpress applicant.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-gdilink",
              "w33-con-e-runs",
              "w33-con-e-support",
              "w33-con-e-paperbasis",
              "w33-con-e-mercator",
              "w33-con-e-issues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
              "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Some authors lead the Collaboratory; no assertion everyauthor/currentteammember has identical governance rights. Application obstacles are datedreportedaccounts, not original letters.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paperbasis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies network experience for an author-led study",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Actual anchor in retained20April2026GDI article establishes a public referral, not membership, funding, authorship of classifications or identity of the AliExpress applicant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-gdilink"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
                "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "links readers to the DSA40 Collaboratory",
            "sourceName": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "targetName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Issuepage lists historicalMeta submission interruptionDec2024–Apr2025 andTikTok data outageJan2025, with no known currentcriticalissues inorganiser scope. No individualAliExpress refusal/cure or incidentlogs acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-issues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports checked practical issues separate from application decisions",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "No amount, legalgrantor suffix, contract, actual cash or donor veto disclosed. Currentfunderlogo filename is not extra proof of legalidentity. Payment status: Unknown; funding credit only",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-mercator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mercator Stiftung — disclosed project funder",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as funding the joint project since early2024",
            "sourceName": "Mercator Stiftung — disclosed project funder",
            "targetName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "date": "Since early2024 as described inSeptember2025 paper; no precise award/payment interval."
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PaperPDF35 and entry show support plus self-report collection and policy engagement; not an independent audit of every platform decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers application support and recruits submitted experiences",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Self-reporting/support mission, no complete population frame or public original-decision set. Tracker updated8September2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-runs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "collects voluntary application reports and publishes summaries",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "date": "2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          },
          {
            "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
            "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-tracker",
      "label": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Headline70 complete registrations; actualtable68=24accepted27rejected17open. Homepage61public differs from table60public8nonpublic. Unreconciled; complete registration not legal validity, accepted not delivery.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Dataset summary"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-tracker",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-tracker",
        "name": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
        "role": "Dataset summary",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Headline70 complete registrations; actualtable68=24accepted27rejected17open. Homepage61public differs from table60public8nonpublic. Unreconciled; complete registration not legal validity, accepted not delivery.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Headline70 complete registrations; actualtable68=24accepted27rejected17open. Homepage61public differs from table60public8nonpublic. Unreconciled; complete registration not legal validity, accepted not delivery."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The DSA40 voluntary application tracker is a public summary of researchers' reported efforts to obtain platform data. The retained snapshot is dated 8 September 2026. It records application statuses and selected refusal reasons, giving a practical view of access attempts that formal legal obligations alone cannot supply.",
        "structuralRole": "Public evidence register of voluntarily reported application experiences",
        "significance": "The tracker makes access friction inspectable across platforms and can point readers toward specific barriers worth investigating. Its usefulness depends on preserving the difference between a submitted account, an accepted application and delivered data, and on recognising that the published counts do not form a reconciled census.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reading the September 2026 snapshot",
            "text": "The page headline reports 70 complete registrations, while the visible table contains 68: 24 accepted, 27 rejected and 17 open. The homepage's 61 public-data applications also differs from the table's 60 public and eight non-public entries. These unresolved totals preclude a defensible overall approval rate. One AliExpress public-data entry is open, without a submission date, named applicant or original exchange. Published refusal categories cover only part of the rejected population; organiser criticism of a reason is not an adjudication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-runs",
              "w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes",
              "w33-con-e-alientry",
              "w33-con-e-reasons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counts5purpose,2necessity/proportionality,1incomplete,1mismatch,1affiliation,2EUlocation sum12 not27refusals; overlap/coverage unknown. Organiser calls latter2categories invalid, not an adjudication.27application-text submissions and12Article34mentions are different denominators.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-reasons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes partial reported refusal categories and organiser assessments",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "70headline/68table and61homepagepublic/60tablepublic8nonpublic retained. 24accepted/27rejected agree betweenheadline/table;17open table. No rates/generalization or inferred missing cases.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports application statuses with unreconciled denominators",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No submission date, identity, original exchange or exactArticle40paragraph. It cannot be matched to GDI or confidential audit applications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-alientry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "lists one AliExpress public-data entry as open",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "targetName": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Self-reporting/support mission, no complete population frame or public original-decision set. Tracker updated8September2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-runs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "collects voluntary application reports and publishes summaries",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "date": "2026-09-08"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-aliopen",
      "label": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Current anonymous undated entry marked open. No exact paragraph, requested fields, correspondence, GDI identity or FTI-cohort match.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Reported application"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-aliopen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-aliopen",
        "name": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
        "role": "Reported application",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Current anonymous undated entry marked open. No exact paragraph, requested fields, correspondence, GDI identity or FTI-cohort match.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Current anonymous undated entry marked open. No exact paragraph, requested fields, correspondence, GDI identity or FTI-cohort match."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Current anonymous undated entry marked open. No exact paragraph, requested fields, correspondence, GDI identity or FTI-cohort match.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported application",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "No submission date, identity, original exchange or exactArticle40paragraph. It cannot be matched to GDI or confidential audit applications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-alientry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "lists one AliExpress public-data entry as open",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "targetName": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public table platform identification only; no established recipient organisation, application merits or delivery date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-aliprovider"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "names the platform counterpart",
            "sourceName": "One tracked AliExpress public-data request — open",
            "targetName": "AliExpress — service under examined proceedings",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-paper14",
      "label": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Author-led network accounts and proposals, including dated40(12) obstacles. Paper cites earlier research rather than furnishing original decision bundles.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-paper14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-paper14",
        "name": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Author-led network accounts and proposals, including dated40(12) obstacles. Paper cites earlier research rather than furnishing original decision bundles.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Author-led network accounts and proposals, including dated40(12) obstacles. Paper cites earlier research rather than furnishing original decision bundles."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Author-led network accounts and proposals, including dated40(12) obstacles. Paper cites earlier research rather than furnishing original decision bundles.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Some authors lead the Collaboratory; no assertion everyauthor/currentteammember has identical governance rights. Application obstacles are datedreportedaccounts, not original letters.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paperbasis"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "supplies network experience for an author-led study",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Authors propose guidance/codes and sustained public support. No adopted cure procedure, new grant or API right established by the paper.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-resourcesproposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advocates guidance and support for researcher intermediaries",
            "sourceName": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "targetName": "European Commission",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "September2025cover/imprint; publicationsindex22September2025. Study of earlier implementation, not a new2026population evaluation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paperpublication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes the policy paper",
            "sourceName": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "date": "2025-09-22"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-mercator",
      "label": "Mercator Stiftung — disclosed project funder",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Name as printed; exact legal suffix, amount, award agreement, paid funds and reserved approval rights not obtained. No logo-based legal-entity merge.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-mercator",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-mercator",
        "name": "Mercator Stiftung — disclosed project funder",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Name as printed; exact legal suffix, amount, award agreement, paid funds and reserved approval rights not obtained. No logo-based legal-entity merge.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Name as printed; exact legal suffix, amount, award agreement, paid funds and reserved approval rights not obtained. No logo-based legal-entity merge."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Name as printed; exact legal suffix, amount, award agreement, paid funds and reserved approval rights not obtained. No logo-based legal-entity merge.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "No amount, legalgrantor suffix, contract, actual cash or donor veto disclosed. Currentfunderlogo filename is not extra proof of legalidentity. Payment status: Unknown; funding credit only",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-mercator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is disclosed as funding the joint project since early2024",
            "sourceName": "Mercator Stiftung — disclosed project funder",
            "targetName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "date": "Since early2024 as described inSeptember2025 paper; no precise award/payment interval."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records",
            "heading": "Disclosed resources and study-design boundary",
            "text": "PDF 2 says the paper draws on the transnational network built by the Collaboratory, led by some of its authors, and calls it a joint project funded by “Mercator Stiftung” since early 2024. The retained homepage/publications HTML references a funder logo asset named Stiftung-Mercator-Weiss-RGB.png , with empty alt text. The logo image was not separately acquired or visually read. These observations identify the disclosed foundation name; no exact grantor legal suffix, amount, award agreement, payment or reserved approval right was acquired.",
            "matched": [
              "Mercator Stiftung"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1121de8f9ec9ebd30bcc052f9b59d3d6779482b25f3f13b6574dc6455712d7f6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading",
            "title": "Root reading: researcher-side application evidence",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "PolicyPDF2 attributes this joint Collaboratory project to Mercator Stiftung funding and says some paper authors lead it. The Weizenbaum Institute's separate institutional funding statement names the German federal ministry (BMFTR) and State of Berlin. A project grant and host-institution support are different resources; no amounts, donor conditions or reviewer rights are disclosed in these pages. The title-page author list and current homepage team are different dated roles and should not be collapsed into identical governance.",
            "matched": [
              "Mercator Stiftung"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32d0be6ebf8a3ff38a22ec954bdc5e7ba3761a2ff15bbcfe686a1ff31c204243"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
      "label": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Policy paper describes separately funded joint research institute; host funding is not a proved project grant or editorial mandate.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-weizenbaum",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
        "name": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Policy paper describes separately funded joint research institute; host funding is not a proved project grant or editorial mandate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Policy paper describes separately funded joint research institute; host funding is not a proved project grant or editorial mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Weizenbaum Institute is the institutional publication setting for the September 2025 policy paper on research access to platform data associated with the DSA40 Collaboratory. The paper situates practical application experiences within a broader discussion of how the Digital Services Act's research provisions operate.",
        "structuralRole": "Research institution hosting publication and interpretation of access evidence",
        "significance": "An institutional publisher gives practitioner accounts a durable scholarly and policy-facing form. The Weizenbaum connection helps explain how applicant experiences become proposals for better resourcing researcher intermediaries. Its own public funding and the Collaboratory project's separately credited support are different resource relationships.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Publication and funding scope",
            "text": "The paper's cover and imprint place it in September 2025; the Collaboratory publications index dates the listing to 22 September. Its institutional credit names Germany's Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space and the State of Berlin as Weizenbaum funders. The same paper separately credits Mercator Stiftung for the joint Collaboratory project. These statements do not allocate the institute's funding to this study or establish funder control over tracker categories. The study addresses earlier implementation experience rather than a new 2026 census.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bmftr",
              "w33-con-e-berlin",
              "w33-con-e-paperpublication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
              "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "September2025cover/imprint; publicationsindex22September2025. Study of earlier implementation, not a new2026population evaluation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-paperpublication"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "publishes the policy paper",
            "sourceName": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — September2025",
            "date": "2025-09-22"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Separate institute-level credit, not allocated to Collaboratory/thisstudy; amount, payment and approval rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bmftr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "German BMFTR — disclosed institutional funder",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
            "sourceName": "German BMFTR — disclosed institutional funder",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Same host-credit scope as BMFTR; no common grant or control over tracker coding established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-berlin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "State of Berlin — disclosed institutional funder",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
            "sourceName": "State of Berlin — disclosed institutional funder",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records",
            "heading": "Disclosed resources and study-design boundary",
            "text": "The same page describes institutional funding of the Weizenbaum Institute by the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space and the State of Berlin. That institutional credit is not proof those bodies funded this particular study or determined the tracker's categories. No funder approval, sampling instruction, editorial control or access to applicant records is disclosed in the inspected scopes. The authors' leadership, the project's open recruitment and application-support mission do establish a closer organiser/study relationship than an independent audit of platform decisions. The paper also argues for more resources for researcher intermediaries (PDF 35–36); that is a stated policy position, not an awarded new resource.",
            "matched": [
              "Weizenbaum Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c26969439fb9775092b3a06b177a2613914a8155a968e99e894827adb13d4ae0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading",
            "title": "Root reading: researcher-side application evidence",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "PolicyPDF2 attributes this joint Collaboratory project to Mercator Stiftung funding and says some paper authors lead it. The Weizenbaum Institute's separate institutional funding statement names the German federal ministry (BMFTR) and State of Berlin. A project grant and host-institution support are different resources; no amounts, donor conditions or reviewer rights are disclosed in these pages. The title-page author list and current homepage team are different dated roles and should not be collapsed into identical governance.",
            "matched": [
              "Weizenbaum Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32d0be6ebf8a3ff38a22ec954bdc5e7ba3761a2ff15bbcfe686a1ff31c204243"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-bmftr",
      "label": "German BMFTR — disclosed institutional funder",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space as credited inSeptember2025 paper. No specific study allocation or approval right disclosed.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government department"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-bmftr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-bmftr",
        "name": "German BMFTR — disclosed institutional funder",
        "role": "Government department",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space as credited inSeptember2025 paper. No specific study allocation or approval right disclosed.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space as credited inSeptember2025 paper. No specific study allocation or approval right disclosed."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space as credited inSeptember2025 paper. No specific study allocation or approval right disclosed.",
        "structuralRole": "Government department",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Separate institute-level credit, not allocated to Collaboratory/thisstudy; amount, payment and approval rights unknown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-bmftr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
            "sourceName": "German BMFTR — disclosed institutional funder",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-berlin",
      "label": "State of Berlin — disclosed institutional funder",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Separate host-institution funding credit, without amount, programme or study-specific allocation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-berlin",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-berlin",
        "name": "State of Berlin — disclosed institutional funder",
        "role": "Government body",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Separate host-institution funding credit, without amount, programme or study-specific allocation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Separate host-institution funding credit, without amount, programme or study-specific allocation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Separate host-institution funding credit, without amount, programme or study-specific allocation.",
        "structuralRole": "Government body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Same host-credit scope as BMFTR; no common grant or control over tracker coding established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-berlin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
            "sourceName": "State of Berlin — disclosed institutional funder",
            "targetName": "Weizenbaum Institute — institutional host",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records",
            "heading": "Disclosed resources and study-design boundary",
            "text": "The same page describes institutional funding of the Weizenbaum Institute by the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space and the State of Berlin. That institutional credit is not proof those bodies funded this particular study or determined the tracker's categories. No funder approval, sampling instruction, editorial control or access to applicant records is disclosed in the inspected scopes. The authors' leadership, the project's open recruitment and application-support mission do establish a closer organiser/study relationship than an independent audit of platform decisions. The paper also argues for more resources for researcher intermediaries (PDF 35–36); that is a stated policy position, not an awarded new resource.",
            "matched": [
              "State of Berlin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "c26969439fb9775092b3a06b177a2613914a8155a968e99e894827adb13d4ae0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading",
            "title": "Root reading: researcher-side application evidence",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "PolicyPDF2 attributes this joint Collaboratory project to Mercator Stiftung funding and says some paper authors lead it. The Weizenbaum Institute's separate institutional funding statement names the German federal ministry (BMFTR) and State of Berlin. A project grant and host-institution support are different resources; no amounts, donor conditions or reviewer rights are disclosed in these pages. The title-page author list and current homepage team are different dated roles and should not be collapsed into identical governance.",
            "matched": [
              "State of Berlin"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32d0be6ebf8a3ff38a22ec954bdc5e7ba3761a2ff15bbcfe686a1ff31c204243"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-applicants",
      "label": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Researchers/nonprofit organisations supplying accounts and receiving application support; identities of particular tracked records not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Participant role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-applicants",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-applicants",
        "name": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
        "role": "Participant role",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Researchers/nonprofit organisations supplying accounts and receiving application support; identities of particular tracked records not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Researchers/nonprofit organisations supplying accounts and receiving application support; identities of particular tracked records not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 4
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "These are researchers and nonprofit organisations voluntarily contributing their experiences to the DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory. They supply accounts of platform applications and may receive practical application support. The collective represents participating reporters, not every researcher seeking access under the Digital Services Act.",
        "structuralRole": "Researcher-side witnesses to application friction and access outcomes",
        "significance": "Their reports expose obstacles that legal texts and platform transparency reports may omit, such as eligibility refusals or unusable submission systems. Because participation is voluntary and support-oriented, the records describe the experiences gathered by the initiative rather than a measured population-wide success rate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What a submitted experience can show",
            "text": "The Collaboratory combines application assistance with collection of reported statuses and refusal reasons. Its September 2026 material includes partial reasons involving research purpose, necessity, completeness, affiliation and location. The organisers contest some categories, but that assessment is not a regulator's ruling on an individual case. Its separate issue tracker records practical service problems, including historical Meta submission interruption and a TikTok data outage. Particular tracked applicants are not identified in the acquired record, and an accepted application does not itself show that usable data arrived.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes",
              "w33-con-e-reasons",
              "w33-con-e-support",
              "w33-con-e-issues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Counts5purpose,2necessity/proportionality,1incomplete,1mismatch,1affiliation,2EUlocation sum12 not27refusals; overlap/coverage unknown. Organiser calls latter2categories invalid, not an adjudication.27application-text submissions and12Article34mentions are different denominators.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-reasons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "publishes partial reported refusal categories and organiser assessments",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Issuepage lists historicalMeta submission interruptionDec2024–Apr2025 andTikTok data outageJan2025, with no known currentcriticalissues inorganiser scope. No individualAliExpress refusal/cure or incidentlogs acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-issues"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports checked practical issues separate from application decisions",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "70headline/68table and61homepagepublic/60tablepublic8nonpublic retained. 24accepted/27rejected agree betweenheadline/table;17open table. No rates/generalization or inferred missing cases.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports application statuses with unreconciled denominators",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 voluntary application tracker —8September2026",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PaperPDF35 and entry show support plus self-report collection and policy engagement; not an independent audit of every platform decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-support"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "offers application support and recruits submitted experiences",
            "sourceName": "DSA40 Data Access Collaboratory",
            "targetName": "Collaboratory participants — voluntary researcher accounts",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
            "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-treasury",
      "label": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Treasury-facing reporting and intended phase gate are specified; announced funding is not paid supplier revenue or an approval minute.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government department"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-treasury",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-treasury",
        "name": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
        "role": "Government department",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Treasury-facing reporting and intended phase gate are specified; announced funding is not paid supplier revenue or an approval minute.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Treasury-facing reporting and intended phase gate are specified; announced funding is not paid supplier revenue or an approval minute."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "HM Treasury appears here as the funding and phase-approval authority for the Counter Disinformation Data Platform pilot through the Shared Outcomes Fund. The role concerns programme resources and intended government approval arrangements, rather than an operational content-moderation function.",
        "structuralRole": "Public funding source and intended gate for subsequent programme phases",
        "significance": "Treasury approval links the pilot's continued development to a government resource decision. That is a consequential constraint on suppliers and sponsoring departments: the availability of later funding can determine whether a prototype advances. The retained design specifies the gate but does not show a named official exercising it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The funding amount and its basis",
            "text": "The Shared Outcomes Fund Round 2 summary announced GBP8.4 million for the pilot and listed several participating departments and security bodies. The business and contract passages describe Treasury-facing reporting and officials' approval of subsequent-phase funding. GBP8.4 million is announced programme funding, not proven supplier revenue, and should not be added to supplier prices as though it were another payment. Departmental participation also does not establish that each listed body supplied data or controlled a platform.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-treasurygate",
              "w33-con-e-pilotfunding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Intended HMT officials approval/reporting route, not an exercised veto or identified official decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-treasurygate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is assigned approval of subsequent-phase funding",
            "sourceName": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
            "targetName": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "SharedOutcomesFundRound2CDDP entry namesDCMS,FCDO,HomeOffice,CabinetOffice,MOD,GCHQ,NCSC participation. No proof each supplied data or controlled platform; do not add to supplierprices. Financial details: value: 8,400,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pilot funding; no recipient-payment ledger; period: Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 Payment status: No supplier allocation/disbursement established",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-pilotfunding"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "announced GBP8.4million pilot funding",
            "sourceName": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-oliver",
      "label": "Oliver Wyman — inventory-identified CDDP evaluator",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Department inventory names brand for102384; supplier-name/registration fields redacted in released order. Exact legal contracting entity and execution unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-oliver",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-oliver",
        "name": "Oliver Wyman — inventory-identified CDDP evaluator",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Department inventory names brand for102384; supplier-name/registration fields redacted in released order. Exact legal contracting entity and execution unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Department inventory names brand for102384; supplier-name/registration fields redacted in released order. Exact legal contracting entity and execution unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Department inventory names brand for102384; supplier-name/registration fields redacted in released order. Exact legal contracting entity and execution unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Organisation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Department inventory identifiesOliverWyman; order supplier fields redacted. VisiblePhaseI108400+PhaseII547600=656000GBPexVAT; tenderprice/firstyearliabilitybasis, not paid funds. Released copy does not establish signatures/execution. Financial details: value: 656,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed tender/contract price excluding VAT; not payment; period: 102384 phasesI/II Payment status: No payment record acquired",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-owcommission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as commissioning evaluation through102384",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "Oliver Wyman — inventory-identified CDDP evaluator",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding",
            "heading": "Evaluator identity, price and copy limitations",
            "text": "The release inventory identifies document6 as the DCMS/Oliver Wyman evaluation-and-monitoring contract. PDF95 is order102384, but the supplier name, address and registration number are visibly redacted; the brand identification comes from the department's inventory, not a recovered supplier field. Exact legal-entity registration remains unresolved. No related corporate ownership claim is made.",
            "matched": [
              "Oliver Wyman"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d59cfc5e22461e60abd1543b9272c91d28cb54bbce942e4b8e41719fa0fc69ee"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding",
            "heading": "Search result and highest-value next records",
            "text": "Scoped exact-title searches combined CDDP, final report, evaluation, Oliver Wyman and contract102384 across government/parliament/supplier sources. They returned the original commissioning material but no actual final evaluation, agreed KPI set, Treasury gate decision, or completed acceptance certificate. This is an acquisition gap, not evidence that evaluation never occurred or was adverse. No new request was sent.",
            "matched": [
              "Oliver Wyman"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "870fbaf367bad5e04424ca9a3b3277c883a16323a474da80c4d369afae93a563"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "current-synthesis",
            "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
            "heading": "Policy travels through documents and decisions",
            "text": "The newly integrated procurement evidence makes the same distinction financially concrete. CDDP's Oliver Wyman evaluation commission has a disclosed £656,000 price excluding VAT , proposed criteria and a Treasury-linked feasibility gate. These establish commissioning and conditions, not payment, the final evaluation or an exercised funding decision. The announced £8.4 million programme allocation cannot be added to supplier prices as separate expenditure. Redactions and inconsistent contract dates remain unresolved. A23",
            "matched": [
              "Oliver Wyman"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86e7cd930a000f4bab5dc435a8b847b1f5440090b75e04ec4a0e5193fb394ed4"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-evalcontract",
      "label": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "GBP656000excludingVAT tender/contract price, payment after satisfactory deliverables; visible signature fields empty. Order14January2022 vs printed start20December2022/schedules unresolved.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contractual instrument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-evalcontract",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-evalcontract",
        "name": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
        "role": "Contractual instrument",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "GBP656000excludingVAT tender/contract price, payment after satisfactory deliverables; visible signature fields empty. Order14January2022 vs printed start20December2022/schedules unresolved.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "GBP656000excludingVAT tender/contract price, payment after satisfactory deliverables; visible signature fields empty. Order14January2022 vs printed start20December2022/schedules unresolved."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GBP656000excludingVAT tender/contract price, payment after satisfactory deliverables; visible signature fields empty. Order14January2022 vs printed start20December2022/schedules unresolved.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractual instrument",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Specification includes effectiveness of correctly identifying trends, successes/failures and final report for seniorcivilservants. A/B or experimental approaches conditional, not proof of execution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-evalscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP final evaluation and acceptance — commissioned records",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissions process impact correctness and value-for-money evaluation",
            "sourceName": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "targetName": "CDDP final evaluation and acceptance — commissioned records",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Released payment/acceptance terms locate buyer review; no accepted deliverable, invoice approval or payment acquired. Date mismatch and empty signaturefields preserved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-satisfaction"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "conditions payment in arrears on satisfactory deliverables",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provisional schedule names feasibility report and phase decisions; apparent year inconsistencies retained. Actual subsequent funding decision not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-gatecondition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "makes later-phase funding conditional on feasibility assessment",
            "sourceName": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "targetName": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-fundgate",
      "label": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Specification makes subsequent funding conditional on feasibility assessment and HMT approval; actual decision, criteria and submitted evaluation not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision process"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-fundgate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-fundgate",
        "name": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
        "role": "Decision process",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Specification makes subsequent funding conditional on feasibility assessment and HMT approval; actual decision, criteria and submitted evaluation not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Specification makes subsequent funding conditional on feasibility assessment and HMT approval; actual decision, criteria and submitted evaluation not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Specification makes subsequent funding conditional on feasibility assessment and HMT approval; actual decision, criteria and submitted evaluation not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Decision process",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Provisional schedule names feasibility report and phase decisions; apparent year inconsistencies retained. Actual subsequent funding decision not acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-gatecondition"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "makes later-phase funding conditional on feasibility assessment",
            "sourceName": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "targetName": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Intended HMT officials approval/reporting route, not an exercised veto or identified official decision.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-treasurygate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is assigned approval of subsequent-phase funding",
            "sourceName": "HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role",
            "targetName": "CDDP phase continuation — intended Treasury gate",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-evaloutput",
      "label": "CDDP final evaluation and acceptance — commissioned records",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Correct identification of mis/disinformation trends, value-for-money and delivery evaluation are specified. Detailed success/acceptance cells redacted; final report/acceptance not obtained.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Record family"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-evaloutput",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-evaloutput",
        "name": "CDDP final evaluation and acceptance — commissioned records",
        "role": "Record family",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Correct identification of mis/disinformation trends, value-for-money and delivery evaluation are specified. Detailed success/acceptance cells redacted; final report/acceptance not obtained.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Correct identification of mis/disinformation trends, value-for-money and delivery evaluation are specified. Detailed success/acceptance cells redacted; final report/acceptance not obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Correct identification of mis/disinformation trends, value-for-money and delivery evaluation are specified. Detailed success/acceptance cells redacted; final report/acceptance not obtained.",
        "structuralRole": "Record family",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Specification includes effectiveness of correctly identifying trends, successes/failures and final report for seniorcivilservants. A/B or experimental approaches conditional, not proof of execution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-evalscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "commissions process impact correctness and value-for-money evaluation",
            "sourceName": "CDDP evaluation contract102384 — released copy",
            "targetName": "CDDP final evaluation and acceptance — commissioned records",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-public",
      "label": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Reports OSDI and CDDP participation; current controller is PUBLICGROUPINTERNATIONALLIMITED10608507, without backdating historical contractparty.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organisation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-public",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-public",
        "name": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
        "role": "Organisation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Reports OSDI and CDDP participation; current controller is PUBLICGROUPINTERNATIONALLIMITED10608507, without backdating historical contractparty.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Reports OSDI and CDDP participation; current controller is PUBLICGROUPINTERNATIONALLIMITED10608507, without backdating historical contractparty."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 6
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PUBLIC is a supplier and programme brand appearing across UK data-sharing and safety-technology work. Official material names it in the Online Safety Data Initiative consortium; its own publications also describe participation in the Counter Disinformation Data Platform and related evaluation and sector-study work.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial intermediary between public programme design, supplier delivery and evaluation",
        "significance": "PUBLIC connects several parts of the government safety-technology ecosystem through project delivery, evaluation methods and commissioned research. Those recurring appearances can transmit practical knowledge and shape which problems officials see. They do not by themselves establish one shared contract, a common data system or authority over participating platforms.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Programme work and legal identity",
            "text": "Its OSDI service case study reports a prototype, a dataset, an evaluation framework, privacy-impact work and three pilot firms, with live operation proposed as a later stage. Separate records identify a February 2024 DSIT commission for the Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round 2 evaluation and a sector study published on 26 March 2026. The January 2026 website policy names PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, company 10608507, as controller. That current identity cannot automatically identify the legal party to an older or redacted contract.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicidentity",
              "w33-con-e-publiccddp",
              "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
              "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
              "w33-con-e-stcfcommission",
              "w33-con-e-landscapework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published26March2026; appendix describes targetedstakeholdertracker/scripts/affinitymap notacquired. Acknowledgement doesnotimplyeachrespondent answeredallquestions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-landscapework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Data Landscape Review2024–2025 — market study",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "produced a DSIT-commissioned sector study",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Data Landscape Review2024–2025 — market study",
            "date": "2026-03-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "January2026privacyidentity plus registryoverview; no inference this entity contracted on historicalCDDP.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicidentity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as the current website controller",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED",
            "targetName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "date": "As of January2026 notice; exact beginning/end of controller role unknown."
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Same official OSDIconsortium; scope andsupplieridentity notproofPUBLICheldredactedCDDPsubcontract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicosdi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Commercialcase study claimsdataset/framework/DPIA/3pilotfirms/userguidance; finalstageproposesliveoperation. No originalframework,pilotresults or acceptancecertificate acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports delivering a TRL4 prototype for DCMS review and testing",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Undated supplier article namesCDDP among3SOFprojects. Exactwork,commission,fee,legalentity and acceptancedeliverable unknown. OSDIconsortium cannot fill those gaps.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publiccddp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports participation in delivery",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Counter-Disinformation Data Platform",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report sayscommissionFebruary2024 andcoverOctober2024. No commissionprice/payment/legalentity asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-stcfcommission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "authored a separately DSIT-commissioned evaluation",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
            "date": "CommissionFebruary2024; reportOctober2024, exactdaysunknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
            "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-publiclegal",
      "label": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Registry10608507; current websitecontroller association established, historical CDDP contracting entity not.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Company"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-publiclegal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-publiclegal",
        "name": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED",
        "role": "Company",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Registry10608507; current websitecontroller association established, historical CDDP contracting entity not.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Registry10608507; current websitecontroller association established, historical CDDP contracting entity not."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Registry10608507; current websitecontroller association established, historical CDDP contracting entity not.",
        "structuralRole": "Company",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "January2026privacyidentity plus registryoverview; no inference this entity contracted on historicalCDDP.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicidentity"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is identified as the current website controller",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED",
            "targetName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "date": "As of January2026 notice; exact beginning/end of controller role unknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
            "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld",
            "heading": "Finding",
            "text": "The current PUBLIC website identifies its controller as PUBLIC Group International Ltd; the Companies House register supplies the exact legal name PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, number 10608507. This establishes a current brand/entity association. It does not prove that this company was the party performing the historical CDDP work.",
            "matched": [
              "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "783e9bc6aa652d05fa9b276460cf3fb2731eda479cb245107b89ec97c0919cec"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
            "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-subapproval",
      "label": "102548 key-subcontractor approval field — redacted",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Buyer written approval is specified by entry into orderform; names blacked out. Cannot identify PUBLIC, count entities from bars or call these emptyfields.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Contractual record"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-subapproval",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-subapproval",
        "name": "102548 key-subcontractor approval field — redacted",
        "role": "Contractual record",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Buyer written approval is specified by entry into orderform; names blacked out. Cannot identify PUBLIC, count entities from bars or call these emptyfields.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Buyer written approval is specified by entry into orderform; names blacked out. Cannot identify PUBLIC, count entities from bars or call these emptyfields."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Buyer written approval is specified by entry into orderform; names blacked out. Cannot identify PUBLIC, count entities from bars or call these emptyfields.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractual record",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "102548PDF120 says entry grants approval for listedkeysubcontractors; identities redacted. Separate102887NotApplicable field does not resolve this list. No PUBLICsubcontractedge.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-subapproval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "provides written approval through the order-form mechanism",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer",
            "targetName": "102548 key-subcontractor approval field — redacted",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-osdi",
      "label": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Fifteen-month SharedOutcomesFund programme with government,OSTIA,Faculty andPUBLIC. Separate from CDDP andSTCF2; fund-wideGBP200m not projectallocation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Programme"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-osdi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-osdi",
        "name": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
        "role": "Programme",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Fifteen-month SharedOutcomesFund programme with government,OSTIA,Faculty andPUBLIC. Separate from CDDP andSTCF2; fund-wideGBP200m not projectallocation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Fifteen-month SharedOutcomesFund programme with government,OSTIA,Faculty andPUBLIC. Separate from CDDP andSTCF2; fund-wideGBP200m not projectallocation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 7
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Online Safety Data Initiative was a fifteen-month UK Shared Outcomes Fund programme intended to improve access to data for safety-technology development. Government worked with industry participants and a delivery consortium including Faculty and PUBLIC, while PA Consulting was appointed as an external programme evaluator.",
        "structuralRole": "Government-backed experiment in data access and safety-technology evaluation",
        "significance": "OSDI connects public funding, private technical delivery, expert advice and the development of a safety-technology market. It offers a concrete example of how government can build shared data infrastructure and evaluation practices without itself becoming the operator of every resulting product.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Discovery, prototyping and evaluation",
            "text": "The programme's June 2021 discovery account listed 23 candidate data-access solutions awaiting shortlisting, drawing on interviews, industry workshops and a Whitehall roundtable. A government expert group advised scope and legally robust stewardship. PUBLIC subsequently described an OSDI sandbox prototype prepared for government review and testing, and credited OSDI practices in later evaluation work. The product-development strand and PA's programme-assurance role were separate. The retained material establishes these activities and proposals, but does not include the original evaluation framework, complete pilot results or government acceptance certificate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-advises",
              "w33-con-e-discovery",
              "w33-con-e-facultyosdi",
              "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
              "w33-con-e-jointscope",
              "w33-con-e-sandboxprogramme",
              "w33-con-e-methodreuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
              "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Governmentaccount saysDCMS agreedwithPA incollaborationwithFaculty/PUBLIC. This is described processagreement, not unilateral supplierapproval or acquiredcontract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-jointscope"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PA Consulting",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "had responsibilities and priorities agreed with government and consortium",
            "sourceName": "PA Consulting",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Discoveryinterviews,OSTIAworkshops andWhitehallroundtable;23candidate solutions awaitedshortlisting. No individualproposalacceptance or bindingtaxonomy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-discovery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSDI23 candidate solutions — June2021 longlist",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published candidate solutions from discovery input",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "targetName": "OSDI23 candidate solutions — June2021 longlist",
            "date": "2021-06-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government says group had encouraged userexperience emphasis; actualminutes,whichadvice accepted and approvalinstrument not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-advises"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advises scope direction and legally robust data stewardship",
            "sourceName": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Officialdescription/PAaccount namesFaculty/PUBLICconsortium; no CDDPcontractorcrosswalk or project-specificcash inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-facultyosdi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Same official OSDIconsortium; scope andsupplieridentity notproofPUBLICheldredactedCDDPsubcontract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-publicosdi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PUBLICcreditsOSDIalongsideotherinputs; criteria includeperformance,robustness,scalability,privacy/security,userfeedback. OriginalOSDIframework notlinked, footnote17homepageonly.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-methodreuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is expressly credited as a source of evaluation practices",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "targetName": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PUBLICproduct-evaluation strand separate fromPAprogrammeassurance; reported200plusinterviews/3roundtables broader period thanearly70discoveryinterviews, notsummed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-sandboxprogramme"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is identified as the programme case study",
            "sourceName": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass",
            "heading": "Search coverage and discriminating next record",
            "text": "Queries used: \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"PA Consulting\" evaluation report ; \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"evaluation framework\" ; site:gov.uk \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" evaluation results ; \"OSDI\" \"evaluation\" \"PA Consulting\" report ; and \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"evaluation\" \"final\" report . These returned the evaluator announcement, programme planning/longlist material, the retained supplier service definition, sector/data reviews and the STCF2 report. Search-result references to other work do not establish that work was read. Root owns the newer Data Landscape Review; no parallel reread or new branch was started here.",
            "matched": [
              "Online Safety Data Initiative"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "37d16f5570b68c857c019213875538fa2d613670412fd93904a0430b9b5dd706"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass"
          },
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-cdei",
      "label": "Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation — OSDI role",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Convened/chairs10-person2021OnlineHarmsExpertGroup for scope, data-sharing and stewardship advice. No procurement/deployment veto acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government body"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-cdei",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-cdei",
        "name": "Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation — OSDI role",
        "role": "Government body",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Convened/chairs10-person2021OnlineHarmsExpertGroup for scope, data-sharing and stewardship advice. No procurement/deployment veto acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Convened/chairs10-person2021OnlineHarmsExpertGroup for scope, data-sharing and stewardship advice. No procurement/deployment veto acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Convened/chairs10-person2021OnlineHarmsExpertGroup for scope, data-sharing and stewardship advice. No procurement/deployment veto acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Government body",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Datedofficialaccount; specified advisoryrole, not currentstandingdelegation or procurementvote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-chairs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "convened and chaired the expert group",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation — OSDI role",
            "targetName": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "date": "2021-07-02"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
            "heading": "A direct Reset connection, with a defined remit",
            "text": "The government's 2 July 2021 account identifies a ten-person Online Harms Expert Group convened and chaired by the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) for OSDI. Its role included advising on project scope and direction, privacy-preserving and legally robust data sharing, and data-stewardship practice. CDEI says the group had already encouraged attention to users' online experience alongside the technology industry's needs. That is an official account of advice and input, not acquired meeting minutes or an approval instrument.",
            "matched": [
              "Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "23afa4ce3bc988dfbf6cdecabb47a4cc4c57c273954bb5d7f66d9354c71e10cc"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-expertgroup",
      "label": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Official dated advisory group; government reports input on userexperience alongside industryneeds. Advice dispositions/minutes not acquired.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Advisory group"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-expertgroup",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-expertgroup",
        "name": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
        "role": "Advisory group",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Official dated advisory group; government reports input on userexperience alongside industryneeds. Advice dispositions/minutes not acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Official dated advisory group; government reports input on userexperience alongside industryneeds. Advice dispositions/minutes not acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 3
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Official dated advisory group; government reports input on userexperience alongside industryneeds. Advice dispositions/minutes not acquired.",
        "structuralRole": "Advisory group",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "July2021professionalrole is a concreteadvisoryroute; laterResetUKdirectorship separate. No currentemployment,procurementvote,datacontrol or deploymentveto inferred.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-woodgroup"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Poppy Wood",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "was listed as Reset Tech Senior Advisor in the group",
            "sourceName": "Poppy Wood",
            "targetName": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "date": "2021-07-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Government says group had encouraged userexperience emphasis; actualminutes,whichadvice accepted and approvalinstrument not obtained.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-advises"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "advises scope direction and legally robust data stewardship",
            "sourceName": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Datedofficialaccount; specified advisoryrole, not currentstandingdelegation or procurementvote.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-chairs"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation — OSDI role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "convened and chaired the expert group",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation — OSDI role",
            "targetName": "OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021",
            "date": "2021-07-02"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-longlist",
      "label": "OSDI23 candidate solutions — June2021 longlist",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "Nearly70discoveryinterviews,industryworkshops andWhitehallroundtable underpin candidate access/taxonomy/benchmarking/procurement responses. Candidates, not23deliveredtools.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research output"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-longlist",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-longlist",
        "name": "OSDI23 candidate solutions — June2021 longlist",
        "role": "Research output",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Nearly70discoveryinterviews,industryworkshops andWhitehallroundtable underpin candidate access/taxonomy/benchmarking/procurement responses. Candidates, not23deliveredtools.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Nearly70discoveryinterviews,industryworkshops andWhitehallroundtable underpin candidate access/taxonomy/benchmarking/procurement responses. Candidates, not23deliveredtools."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nearly70discoveryinterviews,industryworkshops andWhitehallroundtable underpin candidate access/taxonomy/benchmarking/procurement responses. Candidates, not23deliveredtools.",
        "structuralRole": "Research output",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Discoveryinterviews,OSTIAworkshops andWhitehallroundtable;23candidate solutions awaitedshortlisting. No individualproposalacceptance or bindingtaxonomy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-discovery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "published candidate solutions from discovery input",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "targetName": "OSDI23 candidate solutions — June2021 longlist",
            "date": "2021-06-02"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-sandbox",
      "label": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Supplier says text suicide/self-harm classifier sandbox, dataset/framework,DPIA,3pilotfirms and scalingrecommendations delivered toDCMS forreview/testing. Productionoperation/acceptance unverified.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Prototype"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-sandbox",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-sandbox",
        "name": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
        "role": "Prototype",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "Supplier says text suicide/self-harm classifier sandbox, dataset/framework,DPIA,3pilotfirms and scalingrecommendations delivered toDCMS forreview/testing. Productionoperation/acceptance unverified.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Supplier says text suicide/self-harm classifier sandbox, dataset/framework,DPIA,3pilotfirms and scalingrecommendations delivered toDCMS forreview/testing. Productionoperation/acceptance unverified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Supplier says text suicide/self-harm classifier sandbox, dataset/framework,DPIA,3pilotfirms and scalingrecommendations delivered toDCMS forreview/testing. Productionoperation/acceptance unverified.",
        "structuralRole": "Prototype",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Commercialcase study claimsdataset/framework/DPIA/3pilotfirms/userguidance; finalstageproposesliveoperation. No originalframework,pilotresults or acceptancecertificate acquired.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "reports delivering a TRL4 prototype for DCMS review and testing",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PUBLICproduct-evaluation strand separate fromPAprogrammeassurance; reported200plusinterviews/3roundtables broader period thanearly70discoveryinterviews, notsummed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-sandboxprogramme"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is identified as the programme case study",
            "sourceName": "OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account",
            "targetName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "date": ""
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-stcf",
      "label": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "SeparatePUBLIC-authoredDSITcommission, attributing part ofmethod toOSDI. Boundedtechnicalfindings rely on supplierperformance information and callforindependenttests.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Evaluation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-stcf",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-stcf",
        "name": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
        "role": "Evaluation",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "SeparatePUBLIC-authoredDSITcommission, attributing part ofmethod toOSDI. Boundedtechnicalfindings rely on supplierperformance information and callforindependenttests.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "SeparatePUBLIC-authoredDSITcommission, attributing part ofmethod toOSDI. Boundedtechnicalfindings rely on supplierperformance information and callforindependenttests."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "SeparatePUBLIC-authoredDSITcommission, attributing part ofmethod toOSDI. Boundedtechnicalfindings rely on supplierperformance information and callforindependenttests.",
        "structuralRole": "Evaluation",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PUBLICcreditsOSDIalongsideotherinputs; criteria includeperformance,robustness,scalability,privacy/security,userfeedback. OriginalOSDIframework notlinked, footnote17homepageonly.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-methodreuse"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "is expressly credited as a source of evaluation practices",
            "sourceName": "Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI",
            "targetName": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
            "date": ""
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Report sayscommissionFebruary2024 andcoverOctober2024. No commissionprice/payment/legalentity asserted.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-stcfcommission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "authored a separately DSIT-commissioned evaluation",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024",
            "date": "CommissionFebruary2024; reportOctober2024, exactdaysunknown."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
            "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-landscape",
      "label": "Data Landscape Review2024–2025 — market study",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "PUBLICforDSIT;13interviews28Jan–5Mar2025,9surveyresponses6relevant and55plus sources. Smallpurposivestudy reportspersistentdata/cost/demand/taxonomyfriction; notcausalOSDIevaluation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Publication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w33-con-landscape",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-landscape",
        "name": "Data Landscape Review2024–2025 — market study",
        "role": "Publication",
        "area": "Research & data",
        "intro": "PUBLICforDSIT;13interviews28Jan–5Mar2025,9surveyresponses6relevant and55plus sources. Smallpurposivestudy reportspersistentdata/cost/demand/taxonomyfriction; notcausalOSDIevaluation.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "PUBLICforDSIT;13interviews28Jan–5Mar2025,9surveyresponses6relevant and55plus sources. Smallpurposivestudy reportspersistentdata/cost/demand/taxonomyfriction; notcausalOSDIevaluation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "access-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 1
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PUBLICforDSIT;13interviews28Jan–5Mar2025,9surveyresponses6relevant and55plus sources. Smallpurposivestudy reportspersistentdata/cost/demand/taxonomyfriction; notcausalOSDIevaluation.",
        "structuralRole": "Publication",
        "significance": "",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published26March2026; appendix describes targetedstakeholdertracker/scripts/affinitymap notacquired. Acknowledgement doesnotimplyeachrespondent answeredallquestions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w33-con-e-landscapework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "produced a DSIT-commissioned sector study",
            "sourceName": "PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand",
            "targetName": "Data Landscape Review2024–2025 — market study",
            "date": "2026-03-26"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
            "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": false,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-eleutherai",
      "label": "EleutherAI",
      "type": "organization",
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "summary": "Open-source AI community in the company history.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [
        "research"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-eleutherai",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-eleutherai",
          "label": "EleutherAI",
          "type": "organization",
          "gates": [
            "capability"
          ],
          "summary": "Open-source AI community in the company history.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [
            "research"
          ],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-eleutherai"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "EleutherAI is an open-source AI research community. The Conjecture founding history names Connor Leahy as a co-founder and describes the early company team’s roots there.",
        "structuralRole": "Open-source roots of the Conjecture team",
        "significance": "It supplies the technical and professional background to a later political campaign. A shared career history helps explain how expertise travels; it does not make the organisations interchangeable.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-conjecture-factions",
            "title": "Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks",
            "heading": "What broke, and with whom?",
            "text": "His EleutherAI origins are a different relationship: founders and colleagues carried technical experience from an open-source collective into a company publicly committed to safety research. Work on open models can have acceleration effects without amounting to membership in effective accelerationism. Likewise, a later disagreement with e/acc does not tell us whether there was an earlier organizational tie. [S01/S05]",
            "matched": [
              "EleutherAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f5bde78431da31d8caf31e7718bbb3aab64d566c1c269a87a223df92058b5b33"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-conjecture-factions",
            "title": "Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks",
            "heading": "Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks",
            "text": "The supported sequence is: EleutherAI/open-source roots; a safety-focused startup with venture investors; discussions and later conflict with parts of the EA/technical-safety community; public opposition to e/acc; then Leahy's transition into ControlAI. No reviewed primary statement establishes that Conjecture or Leahy was formerly an e/acc member. A break with EA is explicitly attested. These labels must remain distinct.",
            "matched": [
              "EleutherAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "71d98fe0192f1506b6c425a02ecebad6eef6bfc4108b1bbec1d164d009089466"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture — Our story",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-asi-prohibition",
      "label": "Superintelligence prohibition proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "summary": "An advocated restriction, not an enacted law.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [
        "proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-asi-prohibition",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-asi-prohibition",
          "label": "Superintelligence prohibition proposal",
          "type": "policy",
          "gates": [
            "capability"
          ],
          "summary": "An advocated restriction, not an enacted law.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [
            "proposal"
          ],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-asi-prohibition"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is ControlAI’s proposal to prohibit superintelligence development. It represents a campaign demand, rather than an enacted law or a ban on every kind of AI.",
        "structuralRole": "ControlAI’s proposed restriction",
        "significance": "The proposal is the policy destination of the advocacy branch: the change in permitted activity the campaign is asking governments to make.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI — Campaign and activities",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-uk-lawmakers",
      "label": "UK lawmakers briefed",
      "type": "collective",
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "summary": "A category in the campaign’s account, not a unified actor.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [
        "decision"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-uk-lawmakers",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-uk-lawmakers",
          "label": "UK lawmakers briefed",
          "type": "collective",
          "gates": [
            "capability"
          ],
          "summary": "A category in the campaign’s account, not a unified actor.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [
            "decision"
          ],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-uk-lawmakers"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This category represents UK lawmakers whom ControlAI says it briefs. It does not identify one unified decision-maker or imply that everyone briefed supports the campaign.",
        "structuralRole": "The audience for a reported briefing programme",
        "significance": "Briefings provide a route from an advocacy organisation into legislative discussion. The next step—adoption, rejection or amendment by particular officials—requires its own record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI — Campaign and activities",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-vmss",
      "label": "VMSS",
      "type": "system",
      "gates": [
        "payments"
      ],
      "summary": "Visa’s terminated-merchant screening database, as described by Stripe.",
      "aliases": [
        "Visa Merchant Screening Service"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "operator"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-vmss",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-vmss",
          "label": "VMSS",
          "type": "system",
          "gates": [
            "payments"
          ],
          "summary": "Visa’s terminated-merchant screening database, as described by Stripe.",
          "aliases": [
            "Visa Merchant Screening Service"
          ],
          "roles": [
            "operator"
          ],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-vmss"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "VMSS is Visa’s terminated-merchant screening system, described in Stripe’s public explanation of the databases it checks when evaluating businesses.",
        "structuralRole": "Visa’s merchant-screening database",
        "significance": "A previous merchant relationship can create a risk signal that another provider consults. The database and the provider’s decision about accepting a business are separate parts of that process.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-acquirers",
      "label": "Acquiring banks",
      "type": "collective",
      "gates": [
        "payments"
      ],
      "summary": "An aggregated category of banks in merchant card processing, not a single organisation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-acquirers",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-acquirers",
          "label": "Acquiring banks",
          "type": "collective",
          "gates": [
            "payments"
          ],
          "summary": "An aggregated category of banks in merchant card processing, not a single organisation.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-acquirers"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Acquiring banks support merchants’ acceptance of card payments. In this case they appear as participants in merchant screening, reporting and the route for correcting a MATCH listing.",
        "structuralRole": "Banks that connect merchants to card processing",
        "significance": "The acquirer matters both when a record enters the system and when a merchant challenges it. This category identifies that function; a particular bank’s decision must be traced separately.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-match-removal",
      "label": "MATCH correction procedure",
      "type": "policy",
      "gates": [
        "payments"
      ],
      "summary": "Conditional correction/removal machinery described by Stripe; not proof that payment access was restored.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-match-removal",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-match-removal",
          "label": "MATCH correction procedure",
          "type": "policy",
          "gates": [
            "payments"
          ],
          "summary": "Conditional correction/removal machinery described by Stripe; not proof that payment access was restored.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-match-removal"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This is the conditional correction and removal process for a MATCH record, as described by Stripe. It involves the bank responsible for the listing and the applicable reason for removal.",
        "structuralRole": "The route for challenging a merchant listing",
        "significance": "It is the return path through the payment restriction system. Correcting a database record and persuading a new processor to accept the business are different decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "label": "Age assurance",
      "type": "system",
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "summary": "Age verification, estimation, or a combination. Not a synonym for mandatory identity-document disclosure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-age-assurance",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-age-assurance",
          "label": "Age assurance",
          "type": "system",
          "gates": [
            "identity"
          ],
          "summary": "Age verification, estimation, or a combination. Not a synonym for mandatory identity-document disclosure.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-age-assurance"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Age assurance means checking or estimating a person’s age. Ofcom’s guidance describes several methods, including photo-ID matching and facial age estimation.",
        "structuralRole": "The age-checking function between a user and a service",
        "significance": "This is the point where a rule about age becomes an access condition implemented by a service. The chosen method determines what the user is asked to provide.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Existing account signals classify users for age-based protections.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-google-method"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
                "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Uses account-based age estimation",
            "sourceName": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
            "targetName": "Age assurance",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
            "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The international ICMEC2024 report lists digital age assurance among its programmes and identifies general2024 donors. That refreshes the earlier2023 general acknowledgement snapshot, but it does not disclose amounts or any age-policy earmark. Named general support must not be attributed to the Australian operation or to a specific bill without allocation records.",
            "matched": [
              "Age assurance"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "73037be3720064bb8b098510060f0233ecfbd06882a34ed3c0aa3afa80a7a339"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate",
            "heading": "Result",
            "text": "The 2026 G7 texts politically endorse age assurance, including for conversational AI, but the inspected instruments do not themselves create a universal identity requirement, a named certification monopoly or an enforceable market-entry condition. A concrete compulsory gate appears in 5Rights' response as a demand for future policy : certification before affected products reach the market. That demand is not an adopted provision of these G7 texts.",
            "matched": [
              "Age assurance"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b5dba2b64b23a010bb197a3b6fc8f030fdce491a462ea47a3bad08387d039397"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
            "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate",
            "heading": "Result",
            "text": "There is also a direct institutional counterweight to broad identification: the G7 privacy authorities subsequently reference the ministers' agreement and oppose using age assurance for identification, tracking, profiling or monitoring. This is expressed guidance, not evidence that every implementation complies. The most discriminating next record is an actual implementation instrument that assigns the access decision and specifies its legal basis, methods, override and redress.",
            "matched": [
              "Age assurance"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "71ab397f1ad55ec8f854d375d11e7a1ce5c7f9914b21db0f25480954d2a1389f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
            "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
            "heading": "eSafety's narrower use",
            "text": "The toolkit says it followed an eSafety/US Department of Homeland Security workshop in December2024. The paper's appearance in a 2026 toolkit does not show it was used at that earlier workshop. The toolkit also discusses age assurance, identity verification and encrypted-environment measures elsewhere. Those sections have their own context and references. Footnote34 is not a licence to attribute the whole toolkit to SaferAI, or to claim that its 2024 device-screening proposal became law.",
            "matched": [
              "Age assurance"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e61431cdabe64b26751fc5f5db7dc2fe424203f3fa91826456c45e17ec3a4d84"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
            "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-covered-services",
      "label": "Covered online services",
      "type": "collective",
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-covered-services",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-covered-services",
          "label": "Covered online services",
          "type": "collective",
          "gates": [
            "identity"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-covered-services"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This category represents the online services within the scope of the age-assurance requirements discussed in Ofcom’s guidance. It is not a list of every website.",
        "structuralRole": "Services to which the cited requirements apply",
        "significance": "These services must translate the relevant requirement into an actual access process. The scope of the rule, the chosen provider and the user experience are distinct questions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-adult-users",
      "label": "Adult users",
      "type": "collective",
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-adult-users",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-adult-users",
          "label": "Adult users",
          "type": "collective",
          "gates": [
            "identity"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-adult-users"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This category represents adults asked to establish that they meet an age threshold before receiving access to material or a service.",
        "structuralRole": "Adults encountering an age-checking gate",
        "significance": "A rule intended to restrict children can also impose a proof requirement on adults. The investigation follows how that requirement is implemented and who handles the check.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-photo-id",
      "label": "Photo ID matching",
      "type": "system",
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "summary": "One possible age-assurance method listed by Ofcom, not a requirement for every service.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-photo-id",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-photo-id",
          "label": "Photo ID matching",
          "type": "system",
          "gates": [
            "identity"
          ],
          "summary": "One possible age-assurance method listed by Ofcom, not a requirement for every service.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-photo-id"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Photo-ID matching is one of the age-assurance methods listed by Ofcom. It uses identity-document information as part of the check.",
        "structuralRole": "One method for establishing an age threshold",
        "significance": "It provides an example of how an age rule can involve identity information. Its inclusion in guidance does not make it the required method for every service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-age-estimate",
      "label": "Facial age estimation",
      "type": "system",
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "summary": "Estimation of age, distinct from establishing the identity of a person.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-age-estimate",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-age-estimate",
          "label": "Facial age estimation",
          "type": "system",
          "gates": [
            "identity"
          ],
          "summary": "Estimation of age, distinct from establishing the identity of a person.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-age-estimate"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Facial age estimation is another method listed in Ofcom’s age-assurance guidance. Its immediate purpose is to estimate age, which is different from identifying the person.",
        "structuralRole": "Age estimation from a face",
        "significance": "The method matters because implementation choices change the data involved in an access gate. A category called age assurance does not by itself tell us whether a document, an estimate or another method is being used.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-youtube",
      "label": "YouTube",
      "type": "organization",
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "summary": "Video platform. This slice examines its published content and age-restriction policy.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-youtube",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-youtube",
          "label": "YouTube",
          "type": "organization",
          "gates": [
            "distribution"
          ],
          "summary": "Video platform. This slice examines its published content and age-restriction policy.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-youtube"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "YouTube is the video platform examined in the opening distribution case. The cited record is its published policy on violent or graphic content and age restriction.",
        "structuralRole": "A platform that writes and applies access rules",
        "significance": "The platform combines control of distribution with the ability to distinguish removal from restricted access. The case follows that distinction through to the viewer.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A named streaming-policy coalition",
            "text": "TechNet identifies YouTube as a founding SACA member alongside Amazon and Netflix. The coalition advocates on streaming access and sports distribution. Membership does not establish an enacted rule, a contribution amount or a successful policy outcome.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-ed2-youtube-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-saca"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies YouTube as a SACA founding member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-ed2-youtube-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founding member",
            "sourceName": "YouTube",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "google-canada-age-assurance",
            "title": "Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts",
            "heading": "Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts",
            "text": "Google Canada announced on September 14 that a gradual rollout will begin in coming days. Search and YouTube activity inform age estimates, which trigger protections including restrictions on adult-only Play apps.",
            "matched": [
              "YouTube"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "461077f8a15755f78ce5f8f35f7546c8c1d3a8ca31d90c0d12564f5670a7b4a8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Direct access: https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/ explicitly records Yudkowsky and Soares briefing Sanders; links the official video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oS35oWWl28 . Official upload metadata dates that video 4 March 2026. The full video was not watched in this pass. This supports briefing access, not authorship of later legislation.",
            "matched": [
              "YouTube"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7c3ca46e29c0d4ed31957ec50a52b3f9ae3170ea9f95bfcebbace7945925c6c9"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "heading": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "text": "TechNet's announcement identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. The coalition site seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.",
            "matched": [
              "YouTube"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "59d41bb5d8b549c9dd07a06135e27146893166bfe41b322bffe11fd225dd4336"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Violent or graphic content policies",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802008?hl=en"
          },
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-yt-policy",
      "label": "YouTube content policy",
      "type": "policy",
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "summary": "A platform-published rule with contextual exceptions. Inspect its scope before inferring a specific enforcement outcome.",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-yt-policy",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-yt-policy",
          "label": "YouTube content policy",
          "type": "policy",
          "gates": [
            "distribution"
          ],
          "summary": "A platform-published rule with contextual exceptions. Inspect its scope before inferring a specific enforcement outcome.",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-yt-policy"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This record concerns YouTube’s violent or graphic content policy, including contextual treatment and age restrictions. It is one platform policy, rather than a description of all moderation.",
        "structuralRole": "The published rule for a particular class of content",
        "significance": "The policy supplies the stated categories for a platform decision. A published rule establishes the announced framework; a specific enforcement outcome needs its own evidence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Violent or graphic content policies",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802008?hl=en"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-yt-access",
      "label": "Age-restricted video access",
      "type": "system",
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-yt-access",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-yt-access",
          "label": "Age-restricted video access",
          "type": "system",
          "gates": [
            "distribution"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-yt-access"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Age-restricted access is a way of keeping a video on the platform while limiting who can watch it. In the cited YouTube policy, age and sign-in conditions are part of that gate.",
        "structuralRole": "Restricted distribution while a video remains available",
        "significance": "Distribution can be narrowed without deleting the underlying material. That distinction explains why availability alone does not tell us how easily an audience can reach it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Violent or graphic content policies",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802008?hl=en"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-yt-viewers",
      "label": "YouTube viewers",
      "type": "collective",
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "aliases": [],
      "roles": [],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-yt-viewers",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-yt-viewers",
          "label": "YouTube viewers",
          "type": "collective",
          "gates": [
            "distribution"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "aliases": [],
          "roles": [],
          "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/#explore?node=ed2-yt-viewers"
        }
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "This category represents people attempting to watch age-restricted videos on YouTube. Their access depends on the platform’s applicable age and sign-in conditions.",
        "structuralRole": "The people on the receiving side of the platform gate",
        "significance": "It makes the end-user consequence visible in the map: a content classification becomes a condition someone must meet to watch.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [],
        "findings": [],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Violent or graphic content policies",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802008?hl=en"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "Research through 2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "label": "Bernie Sanders",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Vermont’s independent US senator and joint announcer of a permanent ASI ban and temporary advanced-AI pause.",
      "aliases": [
        "Bernard Sanders",
        "Bernie"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislative sponsor connecting risk advocacy with federal power"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-bernie",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "name": "Bernie Sanders",
        "role": "Legislative sponsor connecting risk advocacy with federal power",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Vermont’s independent US senator and joint announcer of a permanent ASI ban and temporary advanced-AI pause.",
        "why": "Sanders is where expert warnings and campaigning become a proposal for enforceable prohibitions, a regulator and penalties. His public framing emphasizes democratic control of technology companies.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Bernard Sanders",
          "Bernie"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee donor-name query",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ&contributor_name=TEGMARK&contributor_name=TALLINN&contributor_name=TUNA"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Vermont’s independent US senator and joint announcer of a permanent ASI ban and temporary advanced-AI pause.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative sponsor connecting risk advocacy with federal power",
        "significance": "Sanders is where expert warnings and campaigning become a proposal for enforceable prohibitions, a regulator and penalties. His public framing emphasizes democratic control of technology companies.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What he proposes",
            "text": "On September 3 Sanders and Greg Casar announced forthcoming legislation. Their summary proposes a permanent ASI prohibition, a pause until federal oversight is operating, a cabinet-level agency, an expert board, corporate dissolution and up to 20 years in prison. A filed bill number and full congressional statutory text were not recovered in this inquiry.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Connections to this investigation",
            "text": "ControlAI says it consulted on the framework. Sanders reports direct conversation with Geoffrey Hinton; Max Tegmark participated in an earlier public panel. These establish different forms of access, without identifying who wrote each clause or appointing participants to regulatory office.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The campaign-finance record",
            "text": "Friends of Bernie Sanders is his principal Senate committee. FEC reports $24.93 million receipts for January 2025–June 2026. Targeted queries found no matching Moskovitz, Tegmark, Tallinn or Tuna contributions in that committee and period. This is not a full donor audit or evidence about Casar’s finances.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee donor-name query",
                "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ&contributor_name=TEGMARK&contributor_name=TALLINN&contributor_name=TUNA"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Sanders’s June2026 wealth-fund proposal adds an ownership route to his AI agenda: public shares managed by a commission with governance responsibilities. It is distinct from the later advanced-AI pause and ASI prohibition proposal. El-Sayed’s campaign explicitly supports the ownership approach.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
              },
              {
                "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Bernard Sanders's January 20, 2025 Form 2 designates Friends of Bernie Sanders (FEC C00411330) for the 2030 Senate election. The current FEC committee overview reports separately bounded 2025–2026 finances through June 30, 2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-fin-e-principal-committee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Bernard Sanders — FEC candidate overview",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/S4VT00033/?tab=summary"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "designated principal Senate campaign committee",
            "sourceName": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "2025-01-20; current reporting snapshot observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sanders's February 4 announcement says Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-004"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Geoffrey Hinton",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Discussed AI risk",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Hinton",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez announced a distinct data-center construction moratorium proposal in March.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-march-sanders"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces separate March proposal",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders’s office announced introduction on June18; the linked text retains blank procedural fields.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-announces-wealth"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
              },
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces legislation",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders joined Casar in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-02"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sanders's CNN interview says he invited every senator to meet experts concerning AI risks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-010"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
                "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Invited senators to expert meeting",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16 per Axios; primary transcript says Thursday"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders uses expert statements to argue for national and international AI restrictions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-essay"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes case for AI pause and ban",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sanders brought together US/China AI scientists in an April 29 Capitol discussion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-005"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Convened public AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "The money search has a defined boundary",
            "text": "Friends of Bernie Sanders, C00411330, is the principal Senate committee. FEC reports $24.93 million receipts, $23.78 million contributions and $22.84 million ending cash for January 2025 through June 2026. Of individual contributions, $17.27 million is unitemized and $6.51 million itemized. The amended July filing corroborates the cash balance. Its election-cycle totals use a different basis and should not be mixed with the two-year overview.",
            "matched": [
              "Bernie Sanders"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "385a07481bc7de9b6765300dcc2a7db4b95f733294eac692bc721bc32ae44e0b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "A real policy channel",
            "text": "Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar connect this investigation to a concrete proposal for federal control of advanced AI development. ControlAI publicly says it consulted on their framework. That is a direct working connection to an organization already prominent in this corpus. Its exact drafting contribution, contracting legal entity and any fee remain unknown. The September 3 sponsor announcement calls the legislation forthcoming; this inquiry did not recover a filed bill number or complete congressional statutory text.",
            "matched": [
              "Bernie Sanders"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3851fc431dfd4ae26f31008a3710b1fec412d69512e0f07f0037ebccf0a575a0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The connection",
            "text": "In March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room. MIRI's account",
            "matched": [
              "Bernie Sanders"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6614565eb3549cb8407d9dc0c5dee75c7fab7feaf38e50098f5dc9e819d3eecb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee donor-name query",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ&contributor_name=TEGMARK&contributor_name=TALLINN&contributor_name=TUNA"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
            "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bernard Sanders — FEC candidate overview",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/S4VT00033/?tab=summary"
          },
          {
            "title": "Caucus Members",
            "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
          },
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prepared Remarks: Sanders: Regulating AI is as American as apple pie",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/prepared-remarks-sanders-regulating-ai-is-as-american-as-apple-pie/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
            "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Bernie Sanders is Vermont’s independent US senator. With Representative Greg Casar, he announced a proposal to prohibit artificial superintelligence and pause advanced AI development while a new federal oversight system is established.",
          "structuralRole": "Turns AI restriction proposals into legislative action",
          "significance": "Sanders provides a route from expert warnings and organized advocacy to coercive legal powers. His proposal makes the argument over AI control concrete: prohibited activity, a regulator and penalties.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Sanders frames advanced AI as a question of democratic control over powerful technology companies. On 3 September 2026, he and Greg Casar announced forthcoming legislation for a permanent prohibition on artificial superintelligence and a temporary pause in advanced AI development pending federal oversight.",
            "The sponsors’ summary proposes a cabinet-level agency, an expert board and serious penalties, including corporate dissolution and prison sentences of up to twenty years. This investigation has the public release and summary; a filed bill number and full congressional statutory text had not been recovered. That distinction matters because the exact definitions and enforcement language will determine what the proposal would reach.",
            "ControlAI says it consulted on the framework. Sanders has also reported direct discussion with Geoffrey Hinton, while Max Tegmark participated in an earlier public panel. These are different routes by which expert assessments and campaigning enter a legislator’s work. The resulting proposal is one of the clearest points where the AI safety network seeks binding public authority.",
            "Sanders has his own electoral base and institutional power. Friends of Bernie Sanders, his principal Senate committee, reported $24.93 million in receipts for January 2025 through June 2026. Understanding his place in the network requires following policy access as well as money: an organization can influence the shape of a proposal through consultation without being the source of a senator’s campaign finances.",
            "Sanders’s June2026 wealth-fund proposal adds an ownership route to his AI agenda: public shares managed by a commission with governance responsibilities. It is distinct from the later advanced-AI pause and ASI prohibition proposal. El-Sayed’s campaign explicitly supports the ownership approach."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
              "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
              "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
              "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
            },
            {
              "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
              "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
            },
            {
              "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
              "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
              "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
            },
            {
              "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
              "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "label": "Greg Casar",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "US representative and Congressional Progressive Caucus chair joining Sanders on the September AI prohibition proposal.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "House sponsorship, coalition leadership and company oversight"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-casar",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "name": "Greg Casar",
        "role": "House sponsorship, coalition leadership and company oversight",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "US representative and Congressional Progressive Caucus chair joining Sanders on the September AI prohibition proposal.",
        "why": "Casar brings a House legislative route and a labor-and-economic-policy network. His demands for company records show conflict with AI firms.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Caucus Members",
            "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
          },
          {
            "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
          },
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "US representative and Congressional Progressive Caucus chair joining Sanders on the September AI prohibition proposal.",
        "structuralRole": "House sponsorship, coalition leadership and company oversight",
        "significance": "Casar brings a House legislative route and a labor-and-economic-policy network. His demands for company records show conflict with AI firms.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Three forms of political work",
            "text": "Casar jointly announced the ASI proposal, chairs the CPC and has pressed OpenAI and Anthropic for security-incident information. His office says both companies responded to August requests; a September 2 follow-up sought logs and fuller answers by September 15.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Caucus Members",
                "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
              },
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Which allies back which proposal",
            "text": "AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action are named supporters of his August AI Tax and Work Protection Act. Their support for that tax-and-jobs measure must not be transferred to September’s ban without a separate record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Casar's September 2 release says Anthropic answered August requests but withheld logs and sufficient answers; follow-up demanded fuller disclosure by September 15.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-11"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar, Foushee and Jacobs announced the AI Tax and Work Protection Act, funding jobs through a tax on major AI businesses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Introduces separate tax-and-jobs proposal",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Casar's September 2 release records OpenAI's reply and demands logs plus further security information by September 15.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar interview on event day confirms appearance and calls for an enforceable international AI agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-casar-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
                "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Spoke and advocated international controls",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar joined Sanders in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-01"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar co-led an August 10 letter calling for public hearings with major AI CEOs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
            "date": "2026-08-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CPC's current roster identifies Casar as chair.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-03"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Caucus Members",
                "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chairs",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "A real policy channel",
            "text": "Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar connect this investigation to a concrete proposal for federal control of advanced AI development. ControlAI publicly says it consulted on their framework. That is a direct working connection to an organization already prominent in this corpus. Its exact drafting contribution, contracting legal entity and any fee remain unknown. The September 3 sponsor announcement calls the legislation forthcoming; this inquiry did not recover a filed bill number or complete congressional statutory text.",
            "matched": [
              "Greg Casar",
              "Casar"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3851fc431dfd4ae26f31008a3710b1fec412d69512e0f07f0037ebccf0a575a0"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Caucus Members · Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment · Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act · National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "matched": [
              "Casar"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f5a371ea8fa7bf0f2b447e83a4cfccbc3387f6806562b090b8a38b73a3fcf81c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Political demands were visible too. Sanders's office published prepared remarks announcing legislation for the following week and advocating binding international controls. Casar subsequently described his own position in a same-day CNN interview. Those statements establish advocacy, not an enacted law or a common platform adopted by every participant. Sanders's remarks ; Casar interview .",
            "matched": [
              "Casar"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d7343cc7b1b9c225a8783f7f0e220fc899145c0944ea05e124b99dcf886721a9"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon: bounded resignation and network check",
            "heading": "Advocacy and institutional response",
            "text": "Andrea Miotti's9September ControlAI article leads with Coxon's resignation, then describes ControlAI's UK/US legislative work. This establishes use of the statement in advocacy. Miotti claims ControlAI supplied the UK bill, consulted on the Sanders-Casar framework and drafted a government kill-switch amendment. These role claims are attributed to ControlAI. The article distinguishes its narrower precursor/ASI approach from the US proposal's broader temporary advanced-AI pause. It establishes neither sponsorship of Coxon's departure nor advance media coordination.",
            "matched": [
              "Casar"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1cbad39e51b2f3fa77aed28500b241b184762516813c5c0512219fd0eec7f364"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Caucus Members",
            "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
          },
          {
            "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
          },
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          },
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
          },
          {
            "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
            "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "The September 3 proposal for ASI prohibition, an advanced-AI pause and a new federal regulator.",
      "aliases": [
        "Sanders Casar AI bill",
        "ASI ban"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed legal gate on AI development and deployment"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "name": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
        "role": "Proposed legal gate on AI development and deployment",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The September 3 proposal for ASI prohibition, an advanced-AI pause and a new federal regulator.",
        "why": "Who would define prohibited capabilities and decide when development resumes? The summary leaves appointment mechanics and many procedural safeguards unresolved.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Sanders Casar AI bill",
          "ASI ban"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The September 3 proposal for ASI prohibition, an advanced-AI pause and a new federal regulator.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed legal gate on AI development and deployment",
        "significance": "Who would define prohibited capabilities and decide when development resumes? The summary leaves appointment mechanics and many procedural safeguards unresolved.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Read the definition",
            "text": "The sponsor summary reaches systems matching or exceeding human cognitive performance across a broad range of tasks, or able to plan and execute human disempowerment, including undermining the US government. It also covers easily modified systems. This is broader wording than the slogan “smarter than every human.”",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Proposed enforcement",
            "text": "The summary calls for lifecycle monitoring, dangerous-capability removal, ASI destruction, corporate dissolution and criminal penalties of up to 20 years. It sets an international prohibition goal using agreements, allied coordination and export controls. These are proposed powers, not current law.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Status and drafting trail",
            "text": "The official September 3 release calls the legislation forthcoming. ControlAI says it consulted while acknowledging that Sanders’s advanced-AI pause is broader than its own approach. Its separate discussion draft cannot substitute for the missing congressional text.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              },
              {
                "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
                "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The release summary assigns enforcement to an agency and advice to a board. No named Anthropic or closed-weight exemption appears. Introduced statutory text was not recovered in this check; see the linked source-check note for definition and search scope.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ASI prohibition release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "sanders-asi-proposal-source-check"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The sponsor summary proposes a new agency to enforce the ban, monitor frontier AI, supervise capability removal and destruction, and establish rules and review processes needed to end the pause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-agency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would create cabinet-level AI regulator",
            "sourceName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "targetName": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Marcus opposed permanent unilateral prohibition while supporting the need for regulation and considering a temporary pause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
                "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gary Marcus",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly opposes breadth",
            "sourceName": "Gary Marcus",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ITIF published Daniel Castro's criticism of the proposed ban, urging continued AI development alongside safety work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-05"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
                "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for Data Innovation / ITIF",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "ITIF publicly opposes",
            "sourceName": "Center for Data Innovation / ITIF",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "68% of the weighted web-panel sample supported and 25% opposed the policy bundle described in the question.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
                "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tests selected policy components",
            "sourceName": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar joined Sanders in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-01"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders joined Casar in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-02"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Petition calls for enactment, planned committee delivery and follow-up letters to members.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-07"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Solicits congressional support",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI publicly states it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-001"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Consulted on announced framework",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "Public account 2026-09-09; exact consultation dates not established"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "What this changes in the larger picture",
            "text": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI · Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary · Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "matched": [
              "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b18d7155ae27fffb5c31d76ad6e56bb455b09cec4b6c9ace714ed04277df10f2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Conflict remains visible",
            "text": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF · The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it · Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
            "matched": [
              "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "214f7524126d8cb2b683133373c28346425d2f13542bd78fb8af6d0e8cfff705"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
            "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          },
          {
            "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
            "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
            "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
      "label": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "A cabinet-level agency contemplated by the summary; it is not an established institution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed enforcement and model-review authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
        "name": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
        "role": "Proposed enforcement and model-review authority",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A cabinet-level agency contemplated by the summary; it is not an established institution.",
        "why": "Its rules and review processes would condition resumption of advanced AI development. Appointment, budget, review and appeal would be central to its practical power.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A cabinet-level agency contemplated by the summary; it is not an established institution.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed enforcement and model-review authority",
        "significance": "Its rules and review processes would condition resumption of advanced AI development. Appointment, budget, review and appeal would be central to its practical power.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What would sit here",
            "text": "The summary assigns monitoring and supervision of capability removal and ASI destruction to this proposed agency. No appointment roster, procurement award or operating budget has been established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The release summary assigns enforcement to an agency and advice to a board. No named Anthropic or closed-weight exemption appears. Introduced statutory text was not recovered in this check; see the linked source-check note for definition and search scope.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ASI prohibition release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "sanders-asi-proposal-source-check"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The sponsor summary proposes a new agency to enforce the ban, monitor frontier AI, supervise capability removal and destruction, and establish rules and review processes needed to end the pause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-agency"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would create cabinet-level AI regulator",
            "sourceName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "targetName": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The summary proposes an AI expert board advising the new regulator.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed AI Advisory Board — Sanders/Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would provide expert advice",
            "sourceName": "Proposed AI Advisory Board — Sanders/Casar",
            "targetName": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-proposed-board",
      "label": "Proposed AI Advisory Board — Sanders/Casar",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "An expert board proposed to advise the new AI regulator.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Prospective channel from technical expertise to public decisions"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-proposed-board",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-proposed-board",
        "name": "Proposed AI Advisory Board — Sanders/Casar",
        "role": "Prospective channel from technical expertise to public decisions",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An expert board proposed to advise the new AI regulator.",
        "why": "Expert access to Sanders today is distinct from appointment here. Membership, selection and conflict rules require the actual legislation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An expert board proposed to advise the new AI regulator.",
        "structuralRole": "Prospective channel from technical expertise to public decisions",
        "significance": "Expert access to Sanders today is distinct from appointment here. Membership, selection and conflict rules require the actual legislation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A proposed position in the structure",
            "text": "The summary specifies independent scientific and technical advice, without identifying members or their selection process. No existing researcher is mapped as an appointee.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The release summary assigns enforcement to an agency and advice to a board. No named Anthropic or closed-weight exemption appears. Introduced statutory text was not recovered in this check; see the linked source-check note for definition and search scope.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ASI prohibition release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "sanders-asi-proposal-source-check"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The summary proposes an AI expert board advising the new regulator.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-board"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would provide expert advice",
            "sourceName": "Proposed AI Advisory Board — Sanders/Casar",
            "targetName": "Proposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
      "label": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Sanders’s FEC-registered principal Senate campaign committee, C00411330.",
      "aliases": [
        "C00411330"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign receipts, spending and political communication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
        "name": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
        "role": "Campaign receipts, spending and political communication",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Sanders’s FEC-registered principal Senate campaign committee, C00411330.",
        "why": "This is the place to examine campaign finance. Advice supplied to congressional offices is a separate resource channel.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "C00411330"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TEGMARK"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TALLINN"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TUNA"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee employer query",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE&contributor_employer=CONTROL%20AI&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY&contributor_employer=COEFFICIENT&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY&contributor_employer=GOOD%20VENTURES"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sanders’s FEC-registered principal Senate campaign committee, C00411330.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign receipts, spending and political communication",
        "significance": "This is the place to examine campaign finance. Advice supplied to congressional offices is a separate resource channel.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Money and reporting window",
            "text": "For January 1, 2025–June 30, 2026, FEC reports $24,928,186.19 receipts and $23,777,919.99 contributions. Individual contributions total $23,777,892.99: $6,505,715.83 itemized and $17,272,177.16 unitemized. Ending cash is $22,835,011.22. The amended July quarterly filing corroborates cash; its election-cycle totals use a different basis.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Limits of the donor search",
            "text": "Separate queries for Moskovitz, Tegmark, Tallinn and Tuna and selected AI-safety employer strings returned no entries for this committee’s 2025–2026 transaction period. Unitemized donors are not visible here; employer spelling varies; other committees and earlier cycles were not exhaustively searched. Available filings predate September’s announcement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026",
                "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ"
              },
              {
                "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026",
                "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TEGMARK"
              },
              {
                "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026",
                "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TALLINN"
              },
              {
                "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
                "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TUNA"
              },
              {
                "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee employer query",
                "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE&contributor_employer=CONTROL%20AI&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY&contributor_employer=COEFFICIENT&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY&contributor_employer=GOOD%20VENTURES"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Bernard Sanders's January 20, 2025 Form 2 designates Friends of Bernie Sanders (FEC C00411330) for the 2030 Senate election. The current FEC committee overview reports separately bounded 2025–2026 finances through June 30, 2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-fin-e-principal-committee"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Bernard Sanders — FEC candidate overview",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/S4VT00033/?tab=summary"
              },
              {
                "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "designated principal Senate campaign committee",
            "sourceName": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "2025-01-20; current reporting snapshot observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Credited in publication footer",
            "sourceName": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "The money search has a defined boundary",
            "text": "Friends of Bernie Sanders, C00411330, is the principal Senate committee. FEC reports $24.93 million receipts, $23.78 million contributions and $22.84 million ending cash for January 2025 through June 2026. Of individual contributions, $17.27 million is unitemized and $6.51 million itemized. The amended July filing corroborates the cash balance. Its election-cycle totals use a different basis and should not be mixed with the two-year overview.",
            "matched": [
              "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
              "C00411330"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "385a07481bc7de9b6765300dcc2a7db4b95f733294eac692bc721bc32ae44e0b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "No donation bridge established in the checked records",
            "text": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026 · FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
            "matched": [
              "C00411330"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc189d3ac5523c7bc4a84efe32b4e5e02df52dba938fee8930ecfeba748a5221"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TEGMARK"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TALLINN"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TUNA"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee employer query",
            "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE&contributor_employer=CONTROL%20AI&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY&contributor_employer=COEFFICIENT&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY&contributor_employer=GOOD%20VENTURES"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bernard Sanders — FEC candidate overview",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/S4VT00033/?tab=summary"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-cpc",
      "label": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "The congressional caucus chaired by Casar, with Sanders listed as its Senate member.",
      "aliases": [
        "CPC"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "An institutional bridge between the two lawmakers"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-cpc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-cpc",
        "name": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
        "role": "An institutional bridge between the two lawmakers",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The congressional caucus chaired by Casar, with Sanders listed as its Senate member.",
        "why": "Membership explains a shared political setting. Caucus-wide adoption of September’s prohibition has not been established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "CPC"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Caucus Members",
            "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The congressional caucus chaired by Casar, with Sanders listed as its Senate member.",
        "structuralRole": "An institutional bridge between the two lawmakers",
        "significance": "Membership explains a shared political setting. Caucus-wide adoption of September’s prohibition has not been established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Leadership and membership",
            "text": "The caucus roster identifies Casar as chair and Sanders as Senate member. This does not speak for other members’ votes or policy positions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Caucus Members",
                "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CPC's roster lists Sanders as its Senate member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-04"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Caucus Members",
                "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Senate member",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CPC's current roster identifies Casar as chair.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-03"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Caucus Members",
                "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chairs",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals.",
            "matched": [
              "Congressional Progressive Caucus"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9254f147fc80019bbc6da3b8b6b26e7b357e5dd2e0c41e62c6a64b016528608b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Two incentive programs, different money",
            "text": "The Partner Terms, updated 31 January 2026 , give Civic Shout discretion over Joint Action admission, hosting, signer attribution and credit issuance. Each valid referred action earns credits for three national CPC clicks. Credits are nontransferable, nonrefundable and have no cash value; redemption is restricted to eligible petition/letter ads. Hosts may receive signer details. The hosting page says signing joins the host's list, followed by optional suggested actions. These are published rules, not proof of actual credit redemption or every user's experience.",
            "matched": [
              "CPC"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a71cf3cc33384335efc733003304307473427d3f01d18cfb74b027cf5af38483"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Caucus Members",
            "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-hinton",
      "label": "Geoffrey Hinton",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AI researcher whom Sanders identifies as a direct interlocutor on advanced-AI risks.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Expert access and credibility in the risk argument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-hinton",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-hinton",
        "name": "Geoffrey Hinton",
        "role": "Expert access and credibility in the risk argument",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI researcher whom Sanders identifies as a direct interlocutor on advanced-AI risks.",
        "why": "A dated account establishes personal discussion before September. Payment, a staff position or clause-level drafting are not established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI researcher whom Sanders identifies as a direct interlocutor on advanced-AI risks.",
        "structuralRole": "Expert access and credibility in the risk argument",
        "significance": "A dated account establishes personal discussion before September. Payment, a staff position or clause-level drafting are not established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented contact",
            "text": "In his February 4 announcement Sanders said Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans. It supplies no exact meeting date or contract.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sanders's February 4 announcement says Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-004"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Discussed AI risk",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Hinton",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "2026-02-04"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios identifies Hinton among planned expert participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-012"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Hinton",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Expert access has a history",
            "text": "Sanders said in February that Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans. An April 29 panel provides an earlier Tegmark connection. Sanders’s official video page describes bringing US and Chinese scientists together; contemporary reporting names Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan. FLI’s roster separately identifies Tegmark as Founder and Chair. Individual public participation is not proof of FLI drafting or financing.",
            "matched": [
              "Geoffrey Hinton",
              "Hinton"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d4d1d743b768c8ac2664ee7435c20263bed071ed4e127bd3f1c29f9cc6e0b26f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "A planned briefing is not completed attendance",
            "text": "Axios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a planned September 16 Senate briefing. Sanders told CNN he invited every senator, but the rush transcript twice refers to Thursday. The invitation letter was not obtained, leaving the exact date unresolved. These records do not appoint anyone to the proposed advisory board.",
            "matched": [
              "Hinton"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a82f0297f1cceed0fa2d97c23652d99cb925eb402eb5efb6a1caebb2971119a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-cotra",
      "label": "Ajeya Cotra",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "METR staff researcher and investigation coauthor whose warning Sanders cites publicly.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Research findings entering the political case for restriction"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-cotra",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-cotra",
        "name": "Ajeya Cotra",
        "role": "Research findings entering the political case for restriction",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "METR staff researcher and investigation coauthor whose warning Sanders cites publicly.",
        "why": "Cotra connects a technical investigation to Sanders’s argument. Citation and affiliation do not establish endorsement or authorship of the bill.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "METR researcher whose prior work included technical AI safety giving at Coefficient Giving.",
        "structuralRole": "Links grantmaking experience to risk assessment",
        "significance": "Her work spans allocating research resources and assessing model risks.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Research and political use",
            "text": "METR identifies Cotra as staff and coauthor of its August 26 investigation. Sanders cites her assessment in his September 3 essay. METR says OpenAI did not pay for this assessment; that does not describe all METR funding.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Cotra’s METR biography identifies threat modelling and loss-of-control assessment as her current work. It records technical AI safety programme leadership at Coefficient Giving in 2024 and AI giving strategy work in 2025.\n\nThe existing Sanders records also place her analysis in political discussion. Those roles explain why she is a salient connection between funding priorities, technical expertise and the public case for intervention.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
                "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "METR's August 26 report identifies Ajeya Cotra as a staff member and coauthor of its investigation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-014"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Staff researcher and investigation coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-08-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Technical AI safety leadership in 2024; AI giving strategy in 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-cotra-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
                "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former programme and strategy roles",
            "sourceName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders cites Cotra in his public case for legislation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-cotra"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cites AI-risk assessment",
            "sourceName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "targetName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios identifies Cotra among planned expert participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-013"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
            "sourceName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "How research enters the political argument",
            "text": "Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described.",
            "matched": [
              "Ajeya Cotra",
              "Cotra"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f047d91f5a1fd323083539c870536b63dd86f5178c9df80276df1674365b57ab"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "A planned briefing is not completed attendance",
            "text": "Axios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a planned September 16 Senate briefing. Sanders told CNN he invited every senator, but the rush transcript twice refers to Thursday. The invitation letter was not obtained, leaving the exact date unresolved. These records do not appoint anyone to the proposed advisory board.",
            "matched": [
              "Cotra"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a82f0297f1cceed0fa2d97c23652d99cb925eb402eb5efb6a1caebb2971119a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
            "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "METR researcher whose prior work included technical AI safety giving at Coefficient Giving.",
          "structuralRole": "Links grantmaking experience to risk assessment",
          "significance": "Her work spans allocating research resources and assessing model risks.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Cotra’s METR biography identifies threat modelling and loss-of-control assessment as her current work. It records technical AI safety programme leadership at Coefficient Giving in 2024 and AI giving strategy work in 2025.",
            "The existing Sanders records also place her analysis in political discussion. Those roles explain why she is a salient connection between funding priorities, technical expertise and the public case for intervention.",
            "This connection matters because research priorities shape what expertise and measurement tools become available to policymakers. Grantmaking experience and technical assessment are different roles in that process. The earlier role helps explain her place in the network, while the current work is the relevant basis for reading her assessments. A reader can follow her existing METR relationship and the Sanders citations separately, then ask which specific analysis a political proposal relies upon and whether the proposed intervention follows from that analysis."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
              "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
              "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
              "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "METR",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "AI evaluation organization publishing the investigation coauthored by Ajeya Cotra.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Technical assessment as input to public debate"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-metr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "name": "METR",
        "role": "Technical assessment as input to public debate",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI evaluation organization publishing the investigation coauthored by Ajeya Cotra.",
        "why": "The link runs through an identified researcher and report. This inquiry establishes no METR drafting, funding or endorsement of the bill.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "METR evaluates frontier AI; its disclosed independence issue includes lab-provided tokens and a pilot Anthropic publication veto.",
        "structuralRole": "Evaluator between lab access and public risk decisions",
        "significance": "Independence turns on funding, model access, publication rights and demonstrated review conduct—not genealogy alone.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The institutional relationship",
            "text": "The report’s contributor and scope paragraphs identify Cotra as staff and say OpenAI did not pay for this assessment. This research pass checked those paragraphs, not the complete technical investigation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "METR occupies the space between building a model and deciding what to do with it. Technical assessments can become inputs to company release decisions, public risk debates and government policy. That makes the terms of evaluation as important to this investigation as the headline test results.\n\nIts funding and relationships now have their own map: Canary with RAND, philanthropic commitments, government work and access supplied by developers. The useful questions concern who selects the tests, who can see the results and who can challenge a consequential assessment.\n\nMETR says it has not accepted frontier-company funding and does not accept donations made by or at the direction of their staff, while accepting substantial free tokens. Financial separation coexists with practical access dependence. Access agreements and publication terms would show how that tension is managed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
                "url": "https://metr.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              },
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 16: publication rights and funding",
            "text": "METR reports about $71m in recent commitments and denies frontier-company funding or staff-directed gifts, but acknowledges significant free model tokens. Its Anthropic review says the lab had a general publication veto during a pilot NDA; no redactions occurred, and METR published substantive criticism. The veto is a contractual independence risk, not evidence it was used or that METR was paid by Anthropic.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              },
              {
                "title": "METR Anthropic review, p. 12",
                "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-review-veto"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Anthropic announced an eight-week, extensible METR review agreement in September. The earlier OpenAI investigation was a separate engagement; METR says it took no OpenAI payment for it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents"
              },
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-anthropic-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Resources and access in the OpenAI incident review",
            "text": "METR charged no assessment fee but estimates using about $400,000 in free OpenAI API credits. It says preserving future voluntary access influenced drafting, editing and redaction judgments, while standing by its substantive conclusions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-openai-api-credits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "METR says Anthropic had a general veto over publication of its February 2026 risk-report review under their pilot NDA.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-review-veto"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR review of Anthropic automated-R&D risk report",
                "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Held pilot review-publication veto",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Anthropic announces METR investigation of four incidents, with access beyond incident windows and to employees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-anthropic-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Signs independent-review agreement",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "METR's August 26 report identifies Ajeya Cotra as a staff member and coauthor of its investigation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-014"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Staff researcher and investigation coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-08-26"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "METR estimates approximately $400,000 of free OpenAI API credits consumed during its investigation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-openai-api-credits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Provided free API credits for incident review",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ARC Evals, METR’s predecessor, presented voluntary commitments as a testbed for regulation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-rsp-origin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Responsible Scaling Policies — framework",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Prototypes scaling policy",
            "sourceName": "METR",
            "targetName": "Responsible Scaling Policies — framework",
            "date": "Event or period: 2023-09-26; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Raised over preceding six months; donor shares unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-commitments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR’s August 2026 funding commitments",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Approximately $71m committed",
            "sourceName": "METR’s August 2026 funding commitments",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-08-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Supports methods for assessing loss-of-control risks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-eu-contract"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
                "url": "https://metr.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European AI Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Technical-assistance contract",
            "sourceName": "European AI Office",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Biography says he will soon join; start unconfirmed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-benton-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Joe Benton biography",
                "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Joe Benton",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Plans to join",
            "sourceName": "Joe Benton",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "How research enters the political argument",
            "text": "Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described.",
            "matched": [
              "METR"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f047d91f5a1fd323083539c870536b63dd86f5178c9df80276df1674365b57ab"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "METR and Anthropic: the actual levers",
            "text": "METR reports about $71m in recent commitments , says it accepts no frontier-lab funding or staff-directed donations, and acknowledges substantial free model tokens. It lists Anthropic among five labs providing evaluation access and tokens. Its donor list does not establish an Anthropic cash grant. Funding update · METR About .",
            "matched": [
              "METR"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a9293a71ec5b6f0345631571708365009695a23eecd70c54cfec8f4f3a6e9c28"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "METR and Anthropic: the actual levers",
            "text": "The sharper document is METR's review of Anthropic's February 2026 risk report . METR criticized the report's evidence and survey while agreeing, based partly on outside evidence, with its very-low-risk conclusion for Opus 4.6 R&D automation. In its process appendix, METR says Anthropic reviewed publication under an NDA and had a general veto during this pilot. METR says no redactions happened, published its criticism, and wants future review limited to sensitive-information redactions. A contractual veto is an independence risk; this record does not show that it was exercised or that METR's conclusion was purchased.",
            "matched": [
              "METR"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "eb981b3aca38984667c148f92fd9062c04a8bf990aa9a618a821d3da1435a011"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network",
            "heading": "A funded collaboration with RAND",
            "text": "METR’s October 2024 announcement describes about $38m catalyzed through Audacious for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Gates appears in the wider collective; a Gates-specific Canary contribution is not identified. The project profile describes evaluation capacity as the intended outcome.",
            "matched": [
              "METR"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "309a86eaaaeda8ed417eddd0d4496b40ef0cadc268fb0590e169aed9b9376244"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
            "url": "https://metr.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR funding update",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
          },
          {
            "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Joe Benton biography",
            "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
          },
          {
            "title": "METR review of Anthropic automated-R&D risk report",
            "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents"
          },
          {
            "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
            "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "METR develops AI evaluations and helps turn their results into decisions about development and deployment.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects evaluation, philanthropic support and public decision-making",
          "significance": "Its structural importance is translating uncertain capabilities into judgments others may act upon.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "METR occupies the space between building a model and deciding what to do with it. Technical assessments can become inputs to company release decisions, public risk debates and government policy. That makes the terms of evaluation as important to this investigation as the headline test results.",
            "Its funding and relationships now have their own map: Canary with RAND, philanthropic commitments, government work and access supplied by developers. The useful questions concern who selects the tests, who can see the results and who can challenge a consequential assessment.",
            "METR says it has not accepted frontier-company funding and does not accept donations made by or at the direction of their staff, while accepting substantial free tokens. Financial separation coexists with practical access dependence. Access agreements and publication terms would show how that tension is managed.",
            "Anthropic announced an eight-week, extensible METR review agreement in September. The earlier OpenAI investigation was a separate engagement; METR says it took no OpenAI payment for it.",
            "METR charged no assessment fee but estimates using about $400,000 in free OpenAI API credits. It says preserving future voluntary access influenced drafting, editing and redaction judgments, while standing by its substantive conclusions."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
              "url": "https://metr.org/about"
            },
            {
              "title": "METR funding update",
              "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
            },
            {
              "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
              "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
              "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
              "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
            },
            {
              "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
              "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents"
            },
            {
              "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
              "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
      "label": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A planned meeting for senators and AI experts; final date and attendance unverified here.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "A proposed venue for expert access to lawmakers"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-september-briefing",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
        "name": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
        "role": "A proposed venue for expert access to lawmakers",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A planned meeting for senators and AI experts; final date and attendance unverified here.",
        "why": "Invitation opens an information and persuasion channel. It is not an endorsement or appointment to the proposed regulator.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
            "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A planned meeting for senators and AI experts; final date and attendance unverified here.",
        "structuralRole": "A proposed venue for expert access to lawmakers",
        "significance": "Invitation opens an information and persuasion channel. It is not an endorsement or appointment to the proposed regulator.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Invitation and a date discrepancy",
            "text": "Sanders told CNN he invited every senator. Axios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for September 16. CNN’s rush transcript twice says Thursday. The invitation letter and completed attendance were not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
                "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sanders's CNN interview says he invited every senator to meet experts concerning AI risks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-010"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
                "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Invited senators to expert meeting",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16 per Axios; primary transcript says Thursday"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios identifies Tegmark among planned expert participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-011"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Tegmark",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios identifies Hinton among planned expert participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-012"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Geoffrey Hinton",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Hinton",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios identifies Cotra among planned expert participants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-013"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
            "sourceName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s planned Senate AI briefing",
            "date": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
            "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "label": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Earlier public discussion of AI risk and international cooperation convened by Sanders.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "An existing forum connecting Sanders with AI-risk researchers"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
        "name": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
        "role": "An existing forum connecting Sanders with AI-risk researchers",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Earlier public discussion of AI risk and international cooperation convened by Sanders.",
        "why": "The event supplies a prior-contact trail, including Tegmark. International participation alone establishes neither foreign direction nor a formal agreement.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Earlier public discussion of AI risk and international cooperation convened by Sanders.",
        "structuralRole": "An existing forum connecting Sanders with AI-risk researchers",
        "significance": "The event supplies a prior-contact trail, including Tegmark. International participation alone establishes neither foreign direction nor a formal agreement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Public participants",
            "text": "Sanders’s official video page describes the discussion. Contemporary reporting dates it April 29 and names Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan; the Chinese participants joined remotely. The record concerns the event, not September drafting.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sanders brought together US/China AI scientists in an April 29 Capitol discussion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-005"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Convened public AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Zeng Yi as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-008"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Zeng Yi",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Zeng Yi",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Xue Lan as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-009"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Xue Lan",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Xue Lan",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies David Krueger as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-007"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David Krueger",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "David Krueger",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Max Tegmark as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-006"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Tegmark",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Max Tegmark",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-david-krueger",
      "label": "David Krueger",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Participant in an earlier policy discussion"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-david-krueger",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-david-krueger",
        "name": "David Krueger",
        "role": "Participant in an earlier policy discussion",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
        "why": "A bounded public-contact record: no drafting or financing of September’s proposal established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
        "structuralRole": "Participant in an earlier policy discussion",
        "significance": "A bounded public-contact record: no drafting or financing of September’s proposal established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Public participation",
            "text": "David Krueger is named in reporting on the April 29 discussion. It connects this researcher to Sanders’s public consideration of international restrictions, without establishing a continuing appointment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies David Krueger as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-007"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "David Krueger",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-zeng-yi",
      "label": "Zeng Yi",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Participant in an earlier policy discussion"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-zeng-yi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-zeng-yi",
        "name": "Zeng Yi",
        "role": "Participant in an earlier policy discussion",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
        "why": "A bounded public-contact record: no drafting or financing of September’s proposal established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
        "structuralRole": "Participant in an earlier policy discussion",
        "significance": "A bounded public-contact record: no drafting or financing of September’s proposal established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Public participation",
            "text": "Zeng Yi is named in reporting on the April 29 discussion. It connects this researcher to Sanders’s public consideration of international restrictions, without establishing a continuing appointment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Zeng Yi as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-008"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Zeng Yi",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-xue-lan",
      "label": "Xue Lan",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Participant in an earlier policy discussion"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-xue-lan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-xue-lan",
        "name": "Xue Lan",
        "role": "Participant in an earlier policy discussion",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
        "why": "A bounded public-contact record: no drafting or financing of September’s proposal established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI researcher identified in reporting on Sanders’s April 29 panel.",
        "structuralRole": "Participant in an earlier policy discussion",
        "significance": "A bounded public-contact record: no drafting or financing of September’s proposal established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Public participation",
            "text": "Xue Lan is named in reporting on the April 29 discussion. It connects this researcher to Sanders’s public consideration of international restrictions, without establishing a continuing appointment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Xue Lan as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-adv-e-009"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
                "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
            "sourceName": "Xue Lan",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s US–China AI panel — April 29",
            "date": "2026-04-29"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
            "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-controlai-draft",
      "label": "ControlAI US ASI discussion draft",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A separate ControlAI proposal titled Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "An advocacy organization’s proposed legislative machinery"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-controlai-draft",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-controlai-draft",
        "name": "ControlAI US ASI discussion draft",
        "role": "An advocacy organization’s proposed legislative machinery",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A separate ControlAI proposal titled Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026.",
        "why": "Comparing drafts can reveal which definitions and procedures reach legislation. This PDF is not established as Sanders–Casar statutory text.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A separate ControlAI proposal titled Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "An advocacy organization’s proposed legislative machinery",
        "significance": "Comparing drafts can reveal which definitions and procedures reach legislation. This PDF is not established as Sanders–Casar statutory text.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Different definitions",
            "text": "The inspected ControlAI draft requires combined characteristics including sustained autonomy, broad human-level performance and self-modification capable of defeating control. Sanders’s summary uses alternatives. They must not be merged.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
                "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Procedures and blanks",
            "text": "The draft leaves congressional identifiers and the responsible Secretary blank. It proposes temporary seizure, an application to district court for continued custody within seven days, and destruction by court order after notice and hearing. The June 24 landing-page date does not prove every current PDF provision existed then.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
                "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
                "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI publishes an ASI Prohibition Act discussion draft with blank congressional identifiers. Its landing page is dated June24.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
                "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
                "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes separate discussion draft",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI US ASI discussion draft",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
            "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
      "label": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Sanders’s public argument for an advanced-AI pause and international ASI prohibition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Political messaging using technical warnings"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-september-essay",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
        "name": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
        "role": "Political messaging using technical warnings",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Sanders’s public argument for an advanced-AI pause and international ASI prohibition.",
        "why": "The essay shows incident accounts and researchers’ warnings becoming reasons for public policy.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sanders’s public argument for an advanced-AI pause and international ASI prohibition.",
        "structuralRole": "Political messaging using technical warnings",
        "significance": "The essay shows incident accounts and researchers’ warnings becoming reasons for public policy.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Arguments and publication",
            "text": "Sanders cites Cotra and Patel, describes loss of control and argues against leaving the future to technology-company owners. The footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. This record tracks messaging, not an independent verification of the incident.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders uses expert statements to argue for national and international AI restrictions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-essay"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes case for AI pause and ban",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders cites Patel when presenting the case for a pause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-patel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dwarkesh Patel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cites account of AI agents",
            "sourceName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "targetName": "Dwarkesh Patel",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders cites Cotra in his public case for legislation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-cotra"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cites AI-risk assessment",
            "sourceName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "targetName": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Credited in publication footer",
            "sourceName": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-dwarkesh-patel",
      "label": "Dwarkesh Patel",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Writer whose account of AI agents Sanders cites in his September essay.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public interpretation entering a legislative argument"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-dwarkesh-patel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-dwarkesh-patel",
        "name": "Dwarkesh Patel",
        "role": "Public interpretation entering a legislative argument",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Writer whose account of AI agents Sanders cites in his September essay.",
        "why": "Being quoted is not evidence of a paid relationship or agreement with the policy.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Writer whose account of AI agents Sanders cites in his September essay.",
        "structuralRole": "Public interpretation entering a legislative argument",
        "significance": "Being quoted is not evidence of a paid relationship or agreement with the policy.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Why he appears here",
            "text": "Sanders cites Patel’s description of agent coordination in his case for a pause. No drafting role, formal appointment or Patel endorsement is established here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders cites Patel when presenting the case for a pause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-patel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
                "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cites account of AI agents",
            "sourceName": "Sanders’s September 3 AI essay",
            "targetName": "Dwarkesh Patel",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "How research enters the political argument",
            "text": "Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described.",
            "matched": [
              "Dwarkesh Patel",
              "Patel"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f047d91f5a1fd323083539c870536b63dd86f5178c9df80276df1674365b57ab"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
            "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "label": "Civic Shout",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Online advocacy platform hosting a petition supporting the Sanders–Casar Act.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public recruitment and advertising-credit incentives"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "name": "Civic Shout",
        "role": "Public recruitment and advertising-credit incentives",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Online advocacy platform hosting a petition supporting the Sanders–Casar Act.",
        "why": "An observable mobilization mechanism: a policy demand, named partners and resources offered for recruiting signatures.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Civic Shout is a progressive advertising and advocacy platform that sells opt-in email and SMS supporters and website traffic. Civic Shout LLC operates the platform and a fiscally sponsored charitable project supporting nonprofit audience growth.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience acquisition and campaign distribution",
        "significance": "It can approve campaigns, choose hosts and allocate referral credits. The AI petition operates inside this commercial distribution system; its specific funding account and the LLC’s beneficial owners remain unknown.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The resource offer",
            "text": "The public joint-action preview lists College Democrats of America and Left Click. It offers participating recruiters $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature, usable to promote their own causes. Credit issuance, cash payment and total spend are not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The current business model",
            "text": "Current base prices: national/state leads USD 1.25/2.00; national/state clicks USD 0.75/1.25, with prepayment discounts.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Admission and content approval",
            "text": "Staff review ads; content policy excludes conservative campaigns and false/misleading content.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: content policy",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Different referral economics",
            "text": "Joint Actions issue noncash credits for three national CPC clicks per valid action; separate affiliates can receive a variable revenue share through Stripe.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Customers named by the provider",
            "text": "Blue State, Middle Seat, M+R, Environmental Action, Democratic Party of Wisconsin. These names are provider disclosures, not verified invoices or AI-petition funders.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Company ownership remains unresolved",
            "text": "Website owner/operator is Civic Shout LLC, identified as a Delaware LLC by the Foundation footer. LLC members, beneficial owners, stakes and financing history were not obtained. Leadership titles do not establish ownership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: privacy policy",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records do not establish",
            "text": "Customer names are provider representations, not invoices or proof of funding the AI petition. No established Collective Shout connection.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: privacy policy",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: content policy",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint-action preview offers participants $2.25 in ad credits per signature recruited, usable for promotion of their own causes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Offers recruitment advertising credits",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Separate affiliate terms allow variable revenue-share compensation through Stripe or optional platform credits.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-affiliate-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout affiliate program",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Runs revenue-share referral program",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout affiliate program",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Nelson signed a 2022 FEC comment as Civic Shout CEO; current company posts continue to identify his leadership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-ceo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Josh Nelson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Josh Nelson",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Civic Shout retains discretion over hosts, participation, referral attribution, validity and credit issuance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Controls Joint Action admission and credits",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Civic Shout hosts a joint-action petition asking Congress to support the exact Sanders-Casar Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosts advocacy petition",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "BLUEVOTE.ORG reports USD 500 on 2025-09-02 and USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 for Advocacy platform, transactions SB21B.4423/.4424.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BLUEVOTE.ORG",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported USD1,500 in platform purchases",
            "sourceName": "BLUEVOTE.ORG",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Foundation’s current legal notice identifies Civic Shout LLC as its operator under fiscal sponsorship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Operates charitable project",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Golden’s professional résumé identifies this role in 2016–2018.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
                "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Elliott Golden",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Historical cofounder and product designer",
            "sourceName": "Elliott Golden",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "The campaign mechanism is visible",
            "text": "Civic Shout hosts a petition advocating this exact Act. Its joint-action preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click and offers recruiting participants $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature. It promises delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. This identifies an incentive and pressure channel. It does not establish delivered signatures, credit redemption, cash payments or instructions from the sponsors’ offices.",
            "matched": [
              "Civic Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "deaef65692bd7fe43d93764f391525ac1fe01e80ce8700e4e825a2a653b6021a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout",
            "text": "This bounded pass found no shared legal entity, named leader, contract, payer or campaign partnership between Civic Shout and Collective Shout . That is a scoped negative result, not proof of universal independence. Do not create a relationship edge from the similar names. The actual newly listed AI participant links to Action Collective , a separate progressive-action newsletter; that site's public archive does not establish its ultimate ownership.",
            "matched": [
              "Civic Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "82274b86abe5d3aa9b86e73db5ed6ee0893c891e732f0b614275cae115e1fbae"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout",
            "text": "The Australian Business Register identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED , ABN/ACN 30 162 159 097 / 162 159 097, an Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Its team names Melinda Tankard Reist, Caitlin Roper, Renee Chopping, Lyn Swanson Kennedy, Coralie Alison and Bernie Poljak. These differ from the Civic Shout leaders identified above. Its FAQ describes a charity limited by guarantee with no affiliation to religious or political institutions; that last statement is its own representation.",
            "matched": [
              "Civic Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b6cc0a4c4ee841ce2e7a6026f6f3bc79d4894ff0a6ae1ef4ca5e76024c3fa7a5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "money-audiences-and-decision-rights",
            "title": "Money, audiences and decision rights",
            "heading": "What would change the picture next",
            "text": "The most revealing missing records are specific: Civic Shout’s ownership and the AI petition’s campaign account; the Frame grant agreements and named donor-advised fund; CLTR’s executed funding terms and government drafting correspondence; a16z’s investment rights and political-committee allocation rules; and the government integration contracts governing portability, replacement and evaluation. These records could show delegated authority, bargaining limits or independence. Another shared name would answer much less.",
            "matched": [
              "Civic Shout"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2bb179fdef30f94c2db3f818ca967876b8e0da832f20aada9cf15eb5542a5848"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
          },
          {
            "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
            "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: content policy",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: privacy policy",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Civic Shout sells opt-in supporters and website traffic to progressive campaigns. Its AI petition sits inside a commercial system of advertising, joint promotions and referral credits—one way political messages acquire distribution and campaigns acquire usable contact lists.",
          "structuralRole": "Paid audience building for progressive campaigns",
          "significance": "Civic Shout makes a usually invisible part of advocacy visible: audience acquisition has prices, incentives and platform rules. A petition can recruit supporters while helping participating organizations build their own lists.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Civic Shout is an advertising and advocacy platform operated by Civic Shout LLC. Customers can buy opt-in email and SMS supporters or website visits. Its posted pricing distinguishes national and state-level leads and clicks, putting a visible price on acquiring a political audience. Staff review campaigns, and its content policy limits the platform to progressive causes.",
            "The joint-action preview for Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI lists College Democrats of America and Left Click. Participating recruiters are offered $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited action, usable to promote their own causes. These credits provide a reason for allied campaigns to circulate the same petition: each can gain future distribution while advancing a shared message.",
            "The business has more than one incentive mechanism. Joint Actions provide noncash advertising credits; a separate affiliate program offers revenue sharing. Keeping those mechanisms visible explains how a campaign can spread through a network without every participant receiving the same kind of payment.",
            "Civic Shout LLC also operates the Civic Shout Foundation project under Players Philanthropy Fund’s fiscal sponsorship. The project offers nonprofit audience growth through donor-funded packages. The most useful question here is who financed a particular campaign and which participants received audience growth or credits. The specific account funding the AI petition remains an open question in the research."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
              "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
            },
            {
              "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
              "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing"
            },
            {
              "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
              "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
            },
            {
              "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
              "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
            },
            {
              "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
              "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Petition urging Congress to enact the Sanders–Casar prohibition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Constituent-pressure campaign for the exact proposal"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "name": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
        "role": "Constituent-pressure campaign for the exact proposal",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Petition urging Congress to enact the Sanders–Casar prohibition.",
        "why": "The page plans delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. These are intentions, not observed deliveries.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Petition urging Congress to enact the Sanders–Casar prohibition.",
        "structuralRole": "Constituent-pressure campaign for the exact proposal",
        "significance": "The page plans delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. These are intentions, not observed deliveries.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "From signatures to lawmakers",
            "text": "The host names participants and offers recruitment incentives. Its wording calls the bill introduced, but the official announcement is the better status source. No coordinating instruction from the lawmakers’ offices was obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "New evidence and its limits",
            "text": "Live preview now lists Action Collective, College Democrats of America and Left Click. It names Civic Shout as host, offers USD 2.25 noncash ad credits per referred signature and plans committee delivery/follow-up letters. No realized spend, delivery or lawmaker-office instructions verified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The AI petition offers USD 2.25 in advertising credits, equal to three eligible national CPC clicks, per qualifying referred signature.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Offers noncash referral credits",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint-action preview offers participants $2.25 in ad credits per signature recruited, usable for promotion of their own causes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-10"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Offers recruitment advertising credits",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Civic Shout hosts a joint-action petition asking Congress to support the exact Sanders-Casar Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-06"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosts advocacy petition",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Petition calls for enactment, planned committee delivery and follow-up letters to members.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-07"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Solicits congressional support",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The live preview names Action Collective alongside College Democrats of America and Left Click.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-action-collective-participant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              },
              {
                "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
                "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Action Collective",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Listed AI-petition participant",
            "sourceName": "Action Collective",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public joint-action preview names College Democrats of America as a participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-08"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "College Democrats of America",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Listed campaign participant",
            "sourceName": "College Democrats of America",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public joint-action preview names Left Click as a participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-09"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Left Click",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Listed campaign participant",
            "sourceName": "Left Click",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
            "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-college-democrats",
      "label": "College Democrats of America",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named by Civic Shout as a participant in its Sanders–Casar petition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Host-listed campaign participant"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-college-democrats",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-college-democrats",
        "name": "College Democrats of America",
        "role": "Host-listed campaign participant",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named by Civic Shout as a participant in its Sanders–Casar petition.",
        "why": "The host’s list does not establish this organization’s decision process, signature volume or payments.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named by Civic Shout as a participant in its Sanders–Casar petition.",
        "structuralRole": "Host-listed campaign participant",
        "significance": "The host’s list does not establish this organization’s decision process, signature volume or payments.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation and scope",
            "text": "The joint-action preview names College Democrats of America. Advertising credits are offered to recruiting participants; credits paid or redeemed by this particular group are not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public joint-action preview names College Democrats of America as a participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-08"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Listed campaign participant",
            "sourceName": "College Democrats of America",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "The campaign mechanism is visible",
            "text": "Civic Shout hosts a petition advocating this exact Act. Its joint-action preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click and offers recruiting participants $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature. It promises delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. This identifies an incentive and pressure channel. It does not establish delivered signatures, credit redemption, cash payments or instructions from the sponsors’ offices.",
            "matched": [
              "College Democrats of America"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "deaef65692bd7fe43d93764f391525ac1fe01e80ce8700e4e825a2a653b6021a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Two incentive programs, different money",
            "text": "The AI petition preview now names Action Collective , College Democrats of America and Left Click as participants. Action Collective was absent from the selectively read existing profile. It is a third name, not Collective Shout. The page offers $2.25 in credits per referred signature, identifies Civic Shout as host, and plans committee delivery and follow-up congressional letters. Actual delivery, realized spending, participant instructions and congressional-office coordination remain unverified. The petition's AI-incident claims were not independently checked in this pass and should not be restated as findings.",
            "matched": [
              "College Democrats of America"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1d66e750b0f2c267482b8b5cf40f27a7318fe492f79b161b04cb68623022bb89"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-left-click",
      "label": "Left Click",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named by Civic Shout as a participant in its Sanders–Casar petition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Host-listed campaign participant"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-left-click",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-left-click",
        "name": "Left Click",
        "role": "Host-listed campaign participant",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named by Civic Shout as a participant in its Sanders–Casar petition.",
        "why": "The host’s list does not establish this organization’s decision process, signature volume or payments.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named by Civic Shout as a participant in its Sanders–Casar petition.",
        "structuralRole": "Host-listed campaign participant",
        "significance": "The host’s list does not establish this organization’s decision process, signature volume or payments.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Participation and scope",
            "text": "The joint-action preview names Left Click. Advertising credits are offered to recruiting participants; credits paid or redeemed by this particular group are not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public joint-action preview names Left Click as a participant.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-09"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Listed campaign participant",
            "sourceName": "Left Click",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "The campaign mechanism is visible",
            "text": "Civic Shout hosts a petition advocating this exact Act. Its joint-action preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click and offers recruiting participants $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature. It promises delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. This identifies an incentive and pressure channel. It does not establish delivered signatures, credit redemption, cash payments or instructions from the sponsors’ offices.",
            "matched": [
              "Left Click"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "deaef65692bd7fe43d93764f391525ac1fe01e80ce8700e4e825a2a653b6021a"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Two incentive programs, different money",
            "text": "The AI petition preview now names Action Collective , College Democrats of America and Left Click as participants. Action Collective was absent from the selectively read existing profile. It is a third name, not Collective Shout. The page offers $2.25 in credits per referred signature, identifies Civic Shout as host, and plans committee delivery and follow-up congressional letters. Actual delivery, realized spending, participant instructions and congressional-office coordination remain unverified. The petition's AI-incident claims were not independently checked in this pass and should not be restated as findings.",
            "matched": [
              "Left Click"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1d66e750b0f2c267482b8b5cf40f27a7318fe492f79b161b04cb68623022bb89"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "OpenAI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "AI developer from which Casar demanded security-incident information.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Industry actor facing congressional oversight"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-openai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "name": "OpenAI",
        "role": "Industry actor facing congressional oversight",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI developer from which Casar demanded security-incident information.",
        "why": "The record shows an adversarial information demand, rather than a financial or advisory relationship.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI developer from which Casar demanded security-incident information.",
        "structuralRole": "Industry actor facing congressional oversight",
        "significance": "The record shows an adversarial information demand, rather than a financial or advisory relationship.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "An actual exchange, as reported by Casar",
            "text": "Casar’s September 2 release reports OpenAI’s response to August requests and demands further logs and security information. The office considers the response insufficient. Underlying correspondence was not read in this pass; that attribution remains explicit.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Casar's September 2 release records OpenAI's reply and demands logs plus further security information by September 15.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-12"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "2026-09-02"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Combines OpenAI models and Anduril Lattice/CUAS data for counter-drone applications and operator decision support.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anduril Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announces national-security AI collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Anduril Industries",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "METR estimates approximately $400,000 of free OpenAI API credits consumed during its investigation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-openai-api-credits"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Provided free API credits for incident review",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Microsoft–Palantir announcement explicitly names GPT-4 and other models through Azure OpenAI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-openai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
                "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Azure OpenAI model distribution route",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "OpenAI names Lysios LLC among the red-teaming organizations in the Operator System Card.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-operator-credit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Credits external red teaming: Operator",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-01-23; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Resolution announced OpenAI-provided credits for research including autoformalization.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-openai-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI grants Resolution $10m in API credits",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$10m in API credits",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Resolution",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "OpenAI endorsed AB1405 registration, independence and accountability requirements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-openai-ab"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly endorses auditor registration",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "OpenAI says it will contribute to the white paper and continue the partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-openai-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Will participate",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "How research enters the political argument",
            "text": "Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described.",
            "matched": [
              "OpenAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f047d91f5a1fd323083539c870536b63dd86f5178c9df80276df1674365b57ab"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "heading": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "text": "The institutional links are tangible. OpenAI credits Lysios for external testing . TrojAI lists John V with Lysios . a16z names Pliny as a grant recipient . Grants, professional roles and testing credits are the working connections here.",
            "matched": [
              "OpenAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "743becb013effd1edb3261db444ec4ce4a6391a35b2954548d3f5cd774dc72ec"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Capital reaches the physical economy",
            "text": "The model-company connection is direct. OpenAI's 31 March 2026 financing announcement names a16z among the co-leads of a round containing $122 billion in committed capital. That figure belongs to the whole round. Neither a16z's investment nor its specific governance rights are disclosed.",
            "matched": [
              "OpenAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "06dd588e834d80ca16d546d5b0b76717742a2058dc0dd022d78a6fca868b1b5c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence",
            "heading": "The conditions behind the money",
            "text": "OpenAI then supplied $10m in API credits , intended for work including automated formal proofs. That support gives the laboratory a practical place in the research operation alongside its philanthropic funder. The credits are resources tied to a particular provider, rather than unrestricted cash.",
            "matched": [
              "OpenAI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aea01f2e180118df7a00da3adbe55af14ab3bf78b61ad92411041eb3922ca52e"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major"
          },
          {
            "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
            "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
            "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI grants Resolution $10m in API credits",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits"
          },
          {
            "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
            "url": "https://naml.us/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
      "label": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "August 10 call for hearings with AI-company leaders and independent experts.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "An earlier oversight coalition"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
        "name": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
        "role": "An earlier oversight coalition",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "August 10 call for hearings with AI-company leaders and independent experts.",
        "why": "This letter’s signatories cannot be transferred into September’s bill-support count.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "August 10 call for hearings with AI-company leaders and independent experts.",
        "structuralRole": "An earlier oversight coalition",
        "significance": "This letter’s signatories cannot be transferred into September’s bill-support count.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A shared action",
            "text": "Casar and Delia Ramirez co-led the request to Speaker Mike Johnson. The inspected source is the office announcement, not the full letter PDF.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Ramirez co-led the call for hearings as relevant House Homeland Security subcommittee ranking member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Delia Ramirez",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
            "sourceName": "Delia Ramirez",
            "targetName": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
            "date": "2026-08-10"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar co-led an August 10 letter calling for public hearings with major AI CEOs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-13"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
            "date": "2026-08-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-delia-ramirez",
      "label": "Delia Ramirez",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "US representative who co-led Casar’s August hearing request.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Congressional working partner on AI oversight"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-delia-ramirez",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-delia-ramirez",
        "name": "Delia Ramirez",
        "role": "Congressional working partner on AI oversight",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "US representative who co-led Casar’s August hearing request.",
        "why": "Collaboration on one action does not establish support for September’s prohibition.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "US representative who co-led Casar’s August hearing request.",
        "structuralRole": "Congressional working partner on AI oversight",
        "significance": "Collaboration on one action does not establish support for September’s prohibition.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recorded partnership",
            "text": "Casar’s August 10 announcement identifies Ramirez as co-lead of the request for hearings with AI-company leaders. That action is mapped here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Ramirez co-led the call for hearings as relevant House Homeland Security subcommittee ranking member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-14"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
            "sourceName": "Delia Ramirez",
            "targetName": "Casar–Ramirez request for AI hearings",
            "date": "2026-08-10"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "label": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Casar’s distinct tax-and-jobs proposal, backed by named labor and advocacy organizations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Coalition around AI, employment and taxation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
        "name": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
        "role": "Coalition around AI, employment and taxation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Casar’s distinct tax-and-jobs proposal, backed by named labor and advocacy organizations.",
        "why": "Separate proposals reveal which alliances are established and which are not demonstrated for the prohibition.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Casar’s distinct tax-and-jobs proposal, backed by named labor and advocacy organizations.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition around AI, employment and taxation",
        "significance": "Separate proposals reveal which alliances are established and which are not demonstrated for the prohibition.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A different purpose and coalition",
            "text": "The August 7 announcement proposes taxing large AI businesses to fund jobs and names AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action as supporters. Randi Weingarten and Gene Sperling joined its press call.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar, Foushee and Jacobs announced the AI Tax and Work Protection Act, funding jobs through a tax on major AI businesses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-15"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Introduces separate tax-and-jobs proposal",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Demand Progress Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Demand Progress Action",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "Demand Progress Action",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Groundwork Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Groundwork Action",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "Groundwork Action",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "AFSCME is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AFSCME",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "AFSCME",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "AFT is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AFT",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "AFT",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-aft",
      "label": "AFT",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-aft",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-aft",
        "name": "AFT",
        "role": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "why": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "structuralRole": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "significance": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Which proposal receives support",
            "text": "Casar’s office lists AFT as a supporter of the August measure. The endorsement attaches to that legislation rather than the later permanent prohibition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "AFT is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-16"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "AFT",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals.",
            "matched": [
              "AFT"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9254f147fc80019bbc6da3b8b6b26e7b357e5dd2e0c41e62c6a64b016528608b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-afscme",
      "label": "AFSCME",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-afscme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-afscme",
        "name": "AFSCME",
        "role": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "why": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "structuralRole": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "significance": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Which proposal receives support",
            "text": "Casar’s office lists AFSCME as a supporter of the August measure. The endorsement attaches to that legislation rather than the later permanent prohibition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "AFSCME is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-17"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "AFSCME",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals.",
            "matched": [
              "AFSCME"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9254f147fc80019bbc6da3b8b6b26e7b357e5dd2e0c41e62c6a64b016528608b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-groundwork-action",
      "label": "Groundwork Action",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-groundwork-action",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-groundwork-action",
        "name": "Groundwork Action",
        "role": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "why": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "structuralRole": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "significance": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Which proposal receives support",
            "text": "Casar’s office lists Groundwork Action as a supporter of the August measure. The endorsement attaches to that legislation rather than the later permanent prohibition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Groundwork Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-18"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "Groundwork Action",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals.",
            "matched": [
              "Groundwork Action"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9254f147fc80019bbc6da3b8b6b26e7b357e5dd2e0c41e62c6a64b016528608b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-demand-progress-action",
      "label": "Demand Progress Action",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-demand-progress-action",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-demand-progress-action",
        "name": "Demand Progress Action",
        "role": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "why": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named supporter of Casar’s August AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "structuralRole": "Support for the distinct tax-and-jobs measure",
        "significance": "Part of a documented policy coalition on employment and taxation; September ASI-ban support is not established.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Which proposal receives support",
            "text": "Casar’s office lists Demand Progress Action as a supporter of the August measure. The endorsement attaches to that legislation rather than the later permanent prohibition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Demand Progress Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-19"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
                "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named supporter",
            "sourceName": "Demand Progress Action",
            "targetName": "AI Tax and Work Protection Act — August proposal",
            "date": "2026-08-07"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals.",
            "matched": [
              "Demand Progress Action"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9254f147fc80019bbc6da3b8b6b26e7b357e5dd2e0c41e62c6a64b016528608b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
            "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
      "label": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "The Sanders–Ocasio-Cortez construction-moratorium proposal, identified as S.4214.",
      "aliases": [
        "S.4214"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Infrastructure restriction tied to worker and community safeguards"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
        "name": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
        "role": "Infrastructure restriction tied to worker and community safeguards",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The Sanders–Ocasio-Cortez construction-moratorium proposal, identified as S.4214.",
        "why": "An earlier restriction route with its own sponsors and labor support.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "S.4214"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
          },
          {
            "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Sanders–Ocasio-Cortez construction-moratorium proposal, identified as S.4214.",
        "structuralRole": "Infrastructure restriction tied to worker and community safeguards",
        "significance": "An earlier restriction route with its own sponsors and labor support.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Purpose and support",
            "text": "The March 25 announcement addresses safety, workers, communities, utilities and environmental impacts. National Nurses United lists S.4214 among supported legislation. That is not an endorsement of September’s ban.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "NNU lists S.4214, the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, in supported national legislation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "National Nurses United",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supports distinct construction moratorium",
            "sourceName": "National Nurses United",
            "targetName": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez announced a distinct data-center construction moratorium proposal in March.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-march-sanders"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces separate March proposal",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Ocasio-Cortez joins Sanders on the earlier data-center measure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-march-aoc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Jointly announces March proposal",
            "sourceName": "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez",
            "targetName": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
          },
          {
            "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-aoc",
      "label": "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "US representative who joined Sanders on the March data-center moratorium.",
      "aliases": [
        "AOC"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "House partner on an earlier infrastructure restriction"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-aoc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-aoc",
        "name": "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez",
        "role": "House partner on an earlier infrastructure restriction",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "US representative who joined Sanders on the March data-center moratorium.",
        "why": "A specific working relationship; support for September’s distinct proposal remains unestablished.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "AOC"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "US representative who joined Sanders on the March data-center moratorium.",
        "structuralRole": "House partner on an earlier infrastructure restriction",
        "significance": "A specific working relationship; support for September’s distinct proposal remains unestablished.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Joint announcement",
            "text": "The March announcement names Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders on a proposed construction moratorium with safety, employment and community conditions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Ocasio-Cortez joins Sanders on the earlier data-center measure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-root-e-march-aoc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Jointly announces March proposal",
            "sourceName": "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez",
            "targetName": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "date": "Checked 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Which friends support which measure",
            "text": "Caucus Members · Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment · Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act · National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "matched": [
              "Ocasio-Cortez"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f5a371ea8fa7bf0f2b447e83a4cfccbc3387f6806562b090b8a38b73a3fcf81c"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-national-nurses-united",
      "label": "National Nurses United",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Nurses’ union listing the March data-center moratorium among supported legislation.",
      "aliases": [
        "NNU"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Labor advocacy around AI’s worker and patient implications"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-national-nurses-united",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-national-nurses-united",
        "name": "National Nurses United",
        "role": "Labor advocacy around AI’s worker and patient implications",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Nurses’ union listing the March data-center moratorium among supported legislation.",
        "why": "A direct endorsement of a specified measure, without an established exact-bill September endorsement.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "NNU"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nurses’ union listing the March data-center moratorium among supported legislation.",
        "structuralRole": "Labor advocacy around AI’s worker and patient implications",
        "significance": "A direct endorsement of a specified measure, without an established exact-bill September endorsement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The union’s own position",
            "text": "NNU identifies S.4214 and presents a pause as time to secure protections for nurses, patients and workers. This edge belongs to the March measure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "NNU lists S.4214, the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, in supported national legislation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-20"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
                "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supports distinct construction moratorium",
            "sourceName": "National Nurses United",
            "targetName": "AI Data Center Moratorium Act — March proposal",
            "date": "observed 2026-09-11"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-dfp",
      "label": "Data for Progress",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Polling organization publishing September research on an AI pause-and-ban description.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Production of public-opinion evidence"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-dfp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-dfp",
        "name": "Data for Progress",
        "role": "Production of public-opinion evidence",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Polling organization publishing September research on an AI pause-and-ban description.",
        "why": "The actual question is narrower than claims that voters approved the full bill.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
            "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
            "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Polling organization publishing September research on an AI pause-and-ban description.",
        "structuralRole": "Production of public-opinion evidence",
        "significance": "The actual question is narrower than claims that voters approved the full bill.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What was measured",
            "text": "The September 4–9 weighted web panel surveyed 1,332 likely US voters. Sixty-eight percent supported and 25 percent opposed a combined pause and prohibition described in the question. It omits prison, dissolution, export controls and agency design, and names neither the bill nor its sponsors. Commissioner or funder not identified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
                "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
                "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Data for Progress published September 4-9 polling on a combined advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-21"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
                "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
                "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes policy-opinion survey",
            "sourceName": "Data for Progress",
            "targetName": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
            "date": "2026-09-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "A poll measures its question",
            "text": "Data for Progress’s September 4–9 weighted web panel of 1,332 likely voters found 68% support and 25% opposition for the described combination of a pause and permanent prohibition. The questionnaire neither names the sponsors nor presents prison terms, corporate dissolution, export controls or the new agency’s architecture. It measures support for selected policy components rather than informed approval of the complete legislation. No commissioner or funder was identified in the inspected materials.",
            "matched": [
              "Data for Progress"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9b2959dc2a10ba6516f9068d0981510967e81aed6b7fe2007a83034352704411"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "A poll measures its question",
            "text": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026) · Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
            "matched": [
              "Data for Progress"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "64c8831a47c4d20da72b36b395e78bbe41a6856febe448ffcf75a3c16665f9cf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
            "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
            "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
      "label": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Data for Progress survey of selected policy components: 68% support and 25% opposition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Measurement of apparent public backing"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
        "name": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
        "role": "Measurement of apparent public backing",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Data for Progress survey of selected policy components: 68% support and 25% opposition.",
        "why": "It cannot answer whether respondents support proposed penalties or the eventual statutory text.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
            "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Data for Progress survey of selected policy components: 68% support and 25% opposition.",
        "structuralRole": "Measurement of apparent public backing",
        "significance": "It cannot answer whether respondents support proposed penalties or the eventual statutory text.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Read the question",
            "text": "The weighted web-panel sample contains 1,332 likely voters. Respondents saw a temporary advanced-AI pause combined with prohibition of systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown, without full legislative enforcement details.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
                "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Data for Progress published September 4-9 polling on a combined advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-21"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
                "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
                "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Data for Progress",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes policy-opinion survey",
            "sourceName": "Data for Progress",
            "targetName": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
            "date": "2026-09-09"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "68% of the weighted web-panel sample supported and 25% opposed the policy bundle described in the question.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-22"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
                "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tests selected policy components",
            "sourceName": "September AI pause-and-ban poll",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-09"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
            "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
            "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
      "label": "Gary Marcus",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AI commentator opposing the proposal’s breadth while favoring regulation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Countervailing voice within the AI-risk debate"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
        "name": "Gary Marcus",
        "role": "Countervailing voice within the AI-risk debate",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI commentator opposing the proposal’s breadth while favoring regulation.",
        "why": "His disagreement exposes a policy conflict inside the regulation camp. Concern about AI is not agreement on permanent prohibition.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
            "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w34-sanders-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI commentator opposing the proposal’s breadth while favoring regulation.",
        "structuralRole": "Countervailing voice within the AI-risk debate",
        "significance": "His disagreement exposes a policy conflict inside the regulation camp. Concern about AI is not agreement on permanent prohibition.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Disagreement over the remedy",
            "text": "Marcus objects to unilateral permanent prohibition while considering a temporary pause and regulator. His postscript favors an Anthony Aguirre formulation allowing narrow tools and conditional high-assurance approval for broader systems. Favoring wording is not a drafting partnership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
                "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w34-sanders-findings"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Marcus's postscript endorsed an Anthony Aguirre formulation allowing narrow tools and conditional development under independent high-assurance review.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-24"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
                "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly favors alternative wording",
            "sourceName": "Gary Marcus",
            "targetName": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Marcus opposed permanent unilateral prohibition while supporting the need for regulation and considering a temporary pause.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w34-sanders-coal-e-23"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
                "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly opposes breadth",
            "sourceName": "Gary Marcus",
            "targetName": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-03"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Conflict remains visible",
            "text": "ITIF publicly opposed the Sanders–Casar prohibition, emphasizing innovation and competition. Gary Marcus also opposed its breadth while arguing for regulation; he favored an alternative formulation by Anthony Aguirre. Casar’s office meanwhile reports actual correspondence demanding security records from OpenAI and Anthropic. The record contains disagreement among regulators’ advocates and conflict between lawmakers and companies. Treating all of them as one camp would erase useful evidence.",
            "matched": [
              "Gary Marcus",
              "Marcus"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8bb4dcfe288625df7362600f2b0348d20465e4d758118803b33ec8ff8293075a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
            "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-11"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "yudkowsky",
      "label": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "MIRI co-founder, leader and board member; coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies and an advocate for international restrictions on advanced AI.",
      "aliases": [
        "Eliezer",
        "Eliezer Yudkowski"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Intellectual and institutional keystone in AI-prohibition advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/yudkowsky",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "yudkowsky",
        "name": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
        "role": "Intellectual and institutional keystone in AI-prohibition advocacy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "MIRI co-founder, leader and board member; coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies and an advocate for international restrictions on advanced AI.",
        "why": "His work connects a research institution, donor resources, a reasoning community, creator adaptations, organized advocacy and access to lawmakers. This is an editorial assessment of connecting roles, not a measured ranking or evidence of command over the whole network.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Eliezer",
          "Eliezer Yudkowski"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI biography",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "MIRI co-founder, leader and board member; coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies and an advocate for international restrictions on advanced AI.",
        "structuralRole": "Intellectual and institutional keystone in AI-prohibition advocacy",
        "significance": "His work connects a research institution, donor resources, a reasoning community, creator adaptations, organized advocacy and access to lawmakers. This is an editorial assessment of connecting roles, not a measured ranking or evidence of command over the whole network.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The institution and the roles",
            "text": "MIRI lists Yudkowsky in Leadership and on its Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO and Nate Soares is president. Those are distinct responsibilities; Yudkowsky is not listed as current CEO.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "From arguments to political access",
            "text": "He and Soares coauthored If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies and joined a briefing for Bernie Sanders described by MIRI in March 2026. ControlAI promotes the book and cites his writing in its lawmaker-briefing guidance. Briefing participation does not establish authorship of Sanders’s later proposal.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: adaptations and contact",
            "text": "In October 2023 the channel’s operator described adapting four Yudkowsky works and inviting him to its production Discord to contribute ideas. A later interview identifies Alice Liu and other writers, with Robert Miles editing. Majority authorship, ownership and a personal payment arrangement are not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
              },
              {
                "title": "Alice Liu interview: Rational Animations writing and editing",
                "url": "https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The enforcement question",
            "text": "His March 2023 TIME essay advocated an indefinite halt to large training runs and willingness to destroy unauthorized datacenters by airstrike despite escalation risk. Later MIRI treaty work has multiple contributors and its own safeguards. His authored position, institutional proposals and enacted law remain separate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Yudkowsky TIME essay,29 March2023",
                "url": "https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "From argument to grant evaluation",
            "text": "Commons lists Yudkowsky among confirmed evaluators. Participating donors choose whose recommendations to follow and retain final funding discretion. The standard evaluator compensation is 2% of funding directed through their recommendations, subject to reductions or waivers; no payment to Yudkowsky is established by this announcement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Commons participant list identifies Yudkowsky as a confirmed evaluator, alongside his MIRI background.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The channel operator described four adaptations and a production-Discord invitation in October 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-ra-adapts"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rational Animations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adapts writing; invited contributions",
            "sourceName": "Rational Animations",
            "targetName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: collaborated on earlier treaty draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-treaty-yud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Collaborated on earlier treaty draft",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: co-founder, leadership and board.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-founder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder, leadership and board",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-book-yud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI biography",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Bernie Sanders: joined march 2026 briefing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-sanders-yud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joined March 2026 briefing",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI → Eliezer Yudkowsky: cites his briefing method.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-teaching"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cites his briefing method",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → LessWrong: founded in 2009.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-lw-founder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "LessWrong",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founded in 2009",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "LessWrong",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The connection",
            "text": "In March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room. MIRI's account",
            "matched": [
              "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
              "Eliezer",
              "Yudkowsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6614565eb3549cb8407d9dc0c5dee75c7fab7feaf38e50098f5dc9e819d3eecb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "Conviction does not settle permission",
            "text": "Yudkowsky is a keystone in this part of RED THREADS because ideas, institutional resources, advocacy and political access meet around his work. That is a judgment about his connecting roles, not a claim that he secretly runs the whole network.",
            "matched": [
              "Yudkowsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a184a91b3e86312a33b39c23ffe2238d7350e1fe51cd59cd744e8806cdc93c55"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Policy record: https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/ is a 2023 authored position advocating international restrictions on large AI training and willingness to enforce them against infrastructure, including military action. It does not establish enacted powers or a policy of executing researchers. The later MIRI treaty is a separate document/version; campaign notes contain its safeguards and operational limitations.",
            "matched": [
              "Eliezer",
              "Yudkowsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86dda2cb3fe8ad1192c0e4af5edbc78f5fc0947df30f3163c69da0b28a82989f"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Local scope: the inspected portable Editorial v2 dataset lacks a named Yudkowsky/MIRI entity profile, while local media-surge research contains MIRI treaty analysis. Correctly record this as an integration gap in that snapshot, not as an absence from all research.",
            "matched": [
              "Yudkowsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e51aa31a7fd9911afd41a6220ddffac54e2467b4b20b20e816630a7df493b014"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI biography",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
          },
          {
            "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alice Liu interview: Rational Animations writing and editing",
            "url": "https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think"
          },
          {
            "title": "Yudkowsky TIME essay,29 March2023",
            "url": "https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "MIRI co-founder, AI-risk writer and advocate, now also named as a Lightcone Commons grant evaluator.",
          "structuralRole": "Ideas, advocacy and grant evaluation",
          "significance": "His role now connects public arguments about AI with a platform where donors can delegate grant judgment.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Yudkowsky helped establish the institution now called MIRI and remains listed in its leadership and on its board. Its present management also includes CEO Malo Bourgon and president Nate Soares. With Soares, Yudkowsky wrote If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, bringing their warning about advanced AI to a wider public while MIRI expanded its communications and governance work.",
            "The arguments travel through other organizations. ControlAI promotes the book and cites his writing in guidance about briefing lawmakers. MIRI’s March 2026 newsletter describes Yudkowsky and Soares joining a briefing for Bernie Sanders. These are concrete routes from an intellectual position into an organized campaign and a political audience.",
            "His influence on online communication is also traceable. Rational Animations’ operator described adapting four of his works and inviting him into its production Discord to contribute ideas. The channel has other writers and editors; what matters here is the documented route by which a body of writing becomes polished audiovisual material for a much larger audience.",
            "The enforcement position deserves direct attention. In a March 2023 TIME essay, Yudkowsky called for an indefinite halt to large training runs and willingness to destroy unauthorized datacenters by airstrike despite escalation risk. Later MIRI treaty work sets out an institutional approach with multiple contributors. His role in this network is consequently about more than predicting danger: he helps define what response to that danger should be considered politically acceptable.",
            "Commons lists Yudkowsky among confirmed evaluators. Participating donors choose whose recommendations to follow and retain final funding discretion. The standard evaluator compensation is 2% of funding directed through their recommendations, subject to reductions or waivers; no payment to Yudkowsky is established by this announcement."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Current MIRI team",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
            },
            {
              "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
              "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai"
            },
            {
              "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
              "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team"
            },
            {
              "title": "Yudkowsky TIME essay,29 March2023",
              "url": "https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
              "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-19"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "miri",
      "label": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The research and advocacy nonprofit co-founded by Eliezer Yudkowsky, historically known as the Singularity Institute.",
      "aliases": [
        "MIRI",
        "Singularity Institute",
        "Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Durable institution connecting research, donor resources and political persuasion"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/miri",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "miri",
        "name": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
        "role": "Durable institution connecting research, donor resources and political persuasion",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The research and advocacy nonprofit co-founded by Eliezer Yudkowsky, historically known as the Singularity Institute.",
        "why": "MIRI can hire staff and sustain communication and governance work across news cycles. Its financial history explains capacity, while dated grant restrictions and donor intentions still matter.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "MIRI",
          "Singularity Institute",
          "Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The research and advocacy nonprofit co-founded by Eliezer Yudkowsky, historically known as the Singularity Institute.",
        "structuralRole": "Durable institution connecting research, donor resources and political persuasion",
        "significance": "MIRI can hire staff and sustain communication and governance work across news cycles. Its financial history explains capacity, while dated grant restrictions and donor intentions still matter.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A documented strategic change",
            "text": "MIRI’s December 2025 fundraising account describes a transition from predominantly technical research toward communications and governance. Its March 2026 newsletter reports communications staff increasing from five to thirteen and plans for content experiments.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Read the money accurately",
            "text": "The April 30, 2026 contributor list credits cumulative institutional support, including leveraged matching funds. Open Philanthropy is credited with $15,925,143; Buterin $5,411,216; SFF $3,372,000; Tallinn $1,631,447; the past Thiel Foundation $1,627,000; FLI $412,252. These are not current campaign allocations or personal earnings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The anonymous gift",
            "text": "MIRI reported selling a 2021 gift of 3,001 MKR for $15,592,829. Spending was limited to $2.5 million annually through 2024, with the remainder available in 2025. The donor was unnamed. The token issuer is not thereby the donor.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Its stated communication standard",
            "text": "MIRI recommends Rational Animations while saying recommendations do not imply full mutual agreement. Its guidance advocates honesty and warns against manipulation. Whether particular conduct meets that standard requires evidence about that conduct.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI: Take Action",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/take-action/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Survival and Flourishing Fund → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $3,372,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Future of Life Institute → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $412,252; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-fli"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient Giving → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $15,925,143; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Vitalik Buterin → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $5,411,216; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Jaan Tallinn → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $1,631,447; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-tallinn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Thiel Foundation → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged past support. MIRI reports $1,627,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-thiel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Thiel Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged past support",
            "sourceName": "Thiel Foundation",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: reported 2021 mkr gift. MIRI reports $15,592,829; sale proceeds from the 2021 gift.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-anon-gift"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reported 2021 MKR gift",
            "sourceName": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: co-founder, leadership and board.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-founder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder, leadership and board",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The institution and the money",
            "text": "MIRI, the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, dates its founding to 2000; it operated as the Singularity Institute until 2013. Its current roster places Yudkowsky under both Leadership and Board as co-founder. Malo Bourgon is CEO. Soares is president. Keeping those roles straight matters: intellectual prominence, board authority and daily executive responsibility are different kinds of power. MIRI history · Current team",
            "matched": [
              "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
              "Singularity Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "56ac9f808a037e3f0a550c38b56dc6a8c0b4ad268f9be99231a0dca487ef7dc6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "MIRI current roles: https://intelligence.org/team/ . Yudkowsky is listed under Leadership and Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO; Nate Soares is President. Earlier Singularity Institute name: https://intelligence.org/transparency/ . These are institutional roles, not proof of personal control over all linked organizations.",
            "matched": [
              "Singularity Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "92511718b878bfcf1ddb8c1ec54f7ecb41a6bded463aa051386f6983c40eceba"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
          },
          {
            "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI: Take Action",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/take-action/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Machine Intelligence Research Institute is the research and advocacy nonprofit co-founded by Eliezer Yudkowsky, historically called the Singularity Institute. After years centered on technical AI-safety research, it has explicitly shifted resources toward communications and governance, including the case for an international agreement restricting advanced AI.",
          "structuralRole": "Turns a body of AI-risk arguments into sustained campaigning",
          "significance": "MIRI gives ideas an institutional base: people can be hired, research and books supported, and political work maintained over time. Its declared strategic shift helps explain the growth of organized AI-restriction advocacy.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "MIRI is an enduring institution in the intellectual history of AI risk. Yudkowsky remains in its leadership and on its board; Malo Bourgon is CEO and Nate Soares is president. The organization gives their work staff, fundraising capacity and a continuing public presence. That is consequential when a technical argument becomes a sustained effort to influence how governments respond.",
            "Its own publications describe a change in emphasis. The December 2025 fundraiser announced a transition from predominantly technical research toward communications and governance. Its March 2026 newsletter reported growth in the communications team from five people to thirteen, along with plans to experiment with content. The same newsletter described Yudkowsky and Soares joining a briefing for Bernie Sanders.",
            "The financial record explains some of that capacity. MIRI’s contributor list credits historical support from Open Philanthropy, Vitalik Buterin, SFF, Tallinn, the Thiel Foundation and FLI. Its list uses cumulative support credits, including matching. A separately disclosed anonymous gift of 3,001 MKR was sold for about $15.59 million in 2021, with annual spending limits through 2024 and the remainder available in 2025.",
            "MIRI also participates in developing international-agreement proposals and recommends material that can carry its concerns to broader audiences, including Rational Animations. Its published communication guidance advocates honesty and warns against manipulation. For readers of this network, the significant development is visible in its allocation of people and effort: the institution increasingly seeks political and public change as part of its answer to AI risk."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Current MIRI team",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
            },
            {
              "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
              "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "nate-soares",
      "label": "Nate Soares",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "MIRI president and Yudkowsky’s coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Institutional leadership and public advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/nate-soares",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "nate-soares",
        "name": "Nate Soares",
        "role": "Institutional leadership and public advocacy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "MIRI president and Yudkowsky’s coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies.",
        "why": "Connects MIRI leadership, book authorship, treaty collaboration and documented access to Bernie Sanders.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "MIRI president and Yudkowsky’s coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies.",
        "structuralRole": "Institutional leadership and public advocacy",
        "significance": "Connects MIRI leadership, book authorship, treaty collaboration and documented access to Bernie Sanders.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "MIRI president and Yudkowsky’s coauthor of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies. Connects MIRI leadership, book authorship, treaty collaboration and documented access to Bernie Sanders.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Commons participant list identifies Soares as a confirmed evaluator.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-soares-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
            "sourceName": "Nate Soares",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Nate Soares → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: president.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-president"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "President",
            "sourceName": "Nate Soares",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Nate Soares → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-book-nate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Nate Soares",
            "targetName": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Nate Soares → Bernie Sanders: joined march 2026 briefing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-sanders-nate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joined March 2026 briefing",
            "sourceName": "Nate Soares",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The connection",
            "text": "In March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room. MIRI's account",
            "matched": [
              "Nate Soares",
              "Soares"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6614565eb3549cb8407d9dc0c5dee75c7fab7feaf38e50098f5dc9e819d3eecb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "Turning an audience into political demand",
            "text": "The Sanders meeting belongs in that sequence as documented access. It establishes an opportunity to inform and persuade him. We have not established that Yudkowsky or Soares drafted the later Sanders/Casar legislation. A photograph or briefing can demonstrate proximity; authorship requires evidence of authorship.",
            "matched": [
              "Soares"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8e1a7bde039ae813a67b36bb6d7c478663f298e0c45a335d01d0b8a3513f62af"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "MIRI current roles: https://intelligence.org/team/ . Yudkowsky is listed under Leadership and Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO; Nate Soares is President. Earlier Singularity Institute name: https://intelligence.org/transparency/ . These are institutional roles, not proof of personal control over all linked organizations.",
            "matched": [
              "Nate Soares",
              "Soares"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "92511718b878bfcf1ddb8c1ec54f7ecb41a6bded463aa051386f6983c40eceba"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Advocacy adoption: https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign promotes Yudkowsky/Soares's book. https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai invokes Yudkowsky's explanation of inferential distance. These support transmission of arguments and methods, not a funding or command edge.",
            "matched": [
              "Soares"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "173eaa38dfdc9534a68bce567bfe3baf0350f7664c754830ab9911fd511b4f00"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "malo-bourgon",
      "label": "Malo Bourgon",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Chief executive officer of MIRI on its current team roster.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Executive responsibility at MIRI"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/malo-bourgon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "malo-bourgon",
        "name": "Malo Bourgon",
        "role": "Executive responsibility at MIRI",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Chief executive officer of MIRI on its current team roster.",
        "why": "His executive role is separate from Yudkowsky’s prominence as co-founder and author and Soares’s presidency. The title alone does not establish each delegated budget decision.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Chief executive officer of MIRI on its current team roster.",
        "structuralRole": "Executive responsibility at MIRI",
        "significance": "His executive role is separate from Yudkowsky’s prominence as co-founder and author and Soares’s presidency. The title alone does not establish each delegated budget decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "Chief executive officer of MIRI on its current team roster. His executive role is separate from Yudkowsky’s prominence as co-founder and author and Soares’s presidency. The title alone does not establish each delegated budget decision.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Malo Bourgon → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: chief executive officer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-ceo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Current MIRI team",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chief executive officer",
            "sourceName": "Malo Bourgon",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The institution and the money",
            "text": "MIRI, the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, dates its founding to 2000; it operated as the Singularity Institute until 2013. Its current roster places Yudkowsky under both Leadership and Board as co-founder. Malo Bourgon is CEO. Soares is president. Keeping those roles straight matters: intellectual prominence, board authority and daily executive responsibility are different kinds of power. MIRI history · Current team",
            "matched": [
              "Malo Bourgon",
              "Bourgon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "56ac9f808a037e3f0a550c38b56dc6a8c0b4ad268f9be99231a0dca487ef7dc6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
            "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "MIRI current roles: https://intelligence.org/team/ . Yudkowsky is listed under Leadership and Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO; Nate Soares is President. Earlier Singularity Institute name: https://intelligence.org/transparency/ . These are institutional roles, not proof of personal control over all linked organizations.",
            "matched": [
              "Malo Bourgon",
              "Bourgon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "92511718b878bfcf1ddb8c1ec54f7ecb41a6bded463aa051386f6983c40eceba"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current MIRI team",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lesswrong",
      "label": "LessWrong",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A reasoning community and publishing platform founded by Yudkowsky in 2009.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Shared language, publication and community infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/lesswrong",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "lesswrong",
        "name": "LessWrong",
        "role": "Shared language, publication and community infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A reasoning community and publishing platform founded by Yudkowsky in 2009.",
        "why": "The FAQ records historical MIRI ownership; Lightcone Infrastructure now lists the site among its projects. This history does not establish that Yudkowsky controls its present operator.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
            "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A reasoning community and publishing platform founded by Yudkowsky in 2009.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared language, publication and community infrastructure",
        "significance": "The FAQ records historical MIRI ownership; Lightcone Infrastructure now lists the site among its projects. This history does not establish that Yudkowsky controls its present operator.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A reasoning community and publishing platform founded by Yudkowsky in 2009. The FAQ records historical MIRI ownership; Lightcone Infrastructure now lists the site among its projects. This history does not establish that Yudkowsky controls its present operator.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
                "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute → LessWrong: historical ownership at founding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-lw-owner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Historical ownership at founding",
            "sourceName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "targetName": "LessWrong",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Lightcone Infrastructure → LessWrong: operates listed infrastructure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-lightcone-lw"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
                "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operates listed infrastructure",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "LessWrong",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → LessWrong: founded in 2009.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-lw-founder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founded in 2009",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "LessWrong",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "A community, a book and a production channel",
            "text": "LessWrong's own history identifies Yudkowsky as its founder in 2009 and describes his writings as part of its philosophical foundation. Its FAQ records that the site began as MIRI property. Today, Lightcone Infrastructure lists LessWrong among the infrastructure it operates. This is a documented genealogy; it does not establish that Yudkowsky currently controls Lightcone. LessWrong FAQ · Lightcone",
            "matched": [
              "LessWrong"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f69ea924268a40326670f4b5eb3579e24d4775739bcb9b4af28b69cac19d0813"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "Who allocates the money?",
            "text": "Lightcone Commons is operated by Lightcone Infrastructure, the organization behind LessWrong and Lighthaven. It is distinct from the similarly named Lightcone Foundation already in the investigation.",
            "matched": [
              "LessWrong"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "da6feb17242c196e5e76a87a5f50d53514bceaa52e1e1414d7edd21c39864e0c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-max-winga-followup",
            "title": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "heading": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
            "text": "His February17 2026 essay 'You're an AI Expert – Not an Influencer' discusses credibility, professional roles, avoiding distracting partisan commentary and protecting a broadly repeatable AI-risk message. Original LessWrong and GreaterWrong fetches failed; the text was inspected in its published audio/transcript distribution. Do not claim original-page access. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer https://podscan.fm/podcasts/lesswrong-curated-amp-popular/episodes/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga-1 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga/id1630783021?i=1000750579675",
            "matched": [
              "LessWrong"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "039d1e296b0656699a52f531fb22a371a6ae242256ff29561a21b141dec61d34"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
            "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "label": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The organization whose current projects include LessWrong and Lighthaven.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Infrastructure for a community of writers, researchers and collaborators"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/lightcone-infrastructure",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "lightcone-infrastructure",
        "name": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
        "role": "Infrastructure for a community of writers, researchers and collaborators",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The organization whose current projects include LessWrong and Lighthaven.",
        "why": "Keep this organization distinct from the Lightcone Foundation in FLI’s financial structure. Shared vocabulary and historical intellectual influence do not establish common legal control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
            "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Operator of LessWrong, Lighthaven and the Lightcone Commons philanthropic-allocation platform.",
        "structuralRole": "Community infrastructure and philanthropic coordination",
        "significance": "It connects a rationalist community's intellectual and physical infrastructure to grantmaking.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The organization whose current projects include LessWrong and Lighthaven. Keep this organization distinct from the Lightcone Foundation in FLI’s financial structure. Shared vocabulary and historical intellectual influence do not establish common legal control.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
                "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Property financing",
            "text": "Habryka’s March 2023 account describes a $20m loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. for purchase and renovations. The December 2025 fundraiser discusses mortgage servicing. The legal loan documents and current balance were not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              },
              {
                "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A separate advance against future support",
            "text": "The 2025 fundraiser describes a $1.7m FTX-settlement arrangement involving Tallinn and SFC, with half of later grant recommendations withheld until $1.29m is offset. This arrangement is separate from the mortgage. Lightcone Infrastructure is also distinct from Lightcone Foundation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A new allocation platform",
            "text": "Lightcone Commons coordinates donors and evaluators using a funding-allocation process adapted from SFF and Lightspeed Grants. Habryka is CEO and a confirmed evaluator. Platform fees and evaluator compensation make the funding service economically explicit.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-commons-operator",
              "w46-e-habryka-lightcone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A legal approval point",
            "text": "The Corrigibility Research Fund identifies Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as legal grantmaker and final approver. This is a documented responsibility beyond providing a platform.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-lightcone-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Lightcone Infrastructure → LessWrong: operates listed infrastructure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-lightcone-lw"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
                "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "LessWrong",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operates listed infrastructure",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "LessWrong",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Commons identifies Habryka as Lightcone Infrastructure CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-lightcone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oliver Habryka",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Oliver Habryka",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Habryka announced ARM had become a Lightcone programme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-lightcone-arm"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone 2026 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund: About",
                "url": "https://www.airiskfund.com/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announced programme migration",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Lightcone retains final approval of the fund’s grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-lightcone-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Legal grantmaker; final approval",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Lightcone Infrastructure operates Lightcone Commons.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-commons-operator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operates grant-allocation platform",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Lightcone’s 2025 fundraiser describes a $1.7m FTX-settlement arrangement involving Tallinn and SFC, with half of later grant recommendations withheld until $1.29m is offset.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-advance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Settlement advance offsets later grants",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Habryka describes $16.5m for property purchase and $3.5m for renovations, lent by Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-loan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$20m reported property loan",
            "sourceName": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "A community, a book and a production channel",
            "text": "LessWrong's own history identifies Yudkowsky as its founder in 2009 and describes his writings as part of its philosophical foundation. Its FAQ records that the site began as MIRI property. Today, Lightcone Infrastructure lists LessWrong among the infrastructure it operates. This is a documented genealogy; it does not establish that Yudkowsky currently controls Lightcone. LessWrong FAQ · Lightcone",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Infrastructure"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f69ea924268a40326670f4b5eb3579e24d4775739bcb9b4af28b69cac19d0813"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "Who allocates the money?",
            "text": "Lightcone Commons is operated by Lightcone Infrastructure, the organization behind LessWrong and Lighthaven. It is distinct from the similarly named Lightcone Foundation already in the investigation.",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Infrastructure"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "da6feb17242c196e5e76a87a5f50d53514bceaa52e1e1414d7edd21c39864e0c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "A smaller programme supplies a completed example. The Corrigibility Research Fund names Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as its legal grantmaker and final approver. Max Harms manages the fund. On September 3 he announced eight awards totalling $132,000, following more than 100 applications, and directed future applicants to Commons. Ian Kahn was awarded $35,000 and Ben Saudek $3,000; Harms says both first contacted him after his appearance on the 80,000 Hours podcast. Here is a visible sequence from public communication to professional contact to funding. Fund structure , awards",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Infrastructure"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5e0864abcead1e7b8b7032a731fefd6b82ddf2e88f51a2bafb59369d051a7eca"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
            "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
            "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone 2026 fundraiser",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund: About",
            "url": "https://www.airiskfund.com/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Operator of LessWrong, Lighthaven and the Lightcone Commons philanthropic-allocation platform.",
          "structuralRole": "Community infrastructure and philanthropic coordination",
          "significance": "It connects a rationalist community's intellectual and physical infrastructure to grantmaking.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Lightcone Infrastructure’s listed projects include LessWrong and Lighthaven. LessWrong supplies a durable home for arguments and discussion; Lighthaven supplies physical space. Together they form part of the environment in which people working on AI risk, rationality and related projects encounter one another and develop ideas. That practical infrastructure is its main role in this investigation.",
            "The property story involves a large financing commitment. In March 2023, Oliver Habryka described a $20 million loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd., comprising $16.5 million for purchase and $3.5 million for renovations. Lightcone’s December 2025 fundraiser discussed mortgage servicing. A campus therefore appears in the graph through a continuing obligation as well as a community benefit.",
            "A separate arrangement followed an FTX settlement. The 2025 fundraiser described a $1.7 million arrangement involving Tallinn and Survival and Flourishing Corp., with half of later grant recommendations withheld until $1.29 million had been offset. This connects future support to an earlier financing solution and makes the dependence more specific than the general observation that a donor supports an organization.",
            "The organization’s significance is the combination of community infrastructure and the financial commitments required to maintain it. People can gain a forum, colleagues, visibility and working space through those resources. The network should consequently show the operators and funding obligations behind that environment alongside the writers and advocates whose work circulates through it.",
            "Lightcone Commons coordinates donors and evaluators using a funding-allocation process adapted from SFF and Lightspeed Grants. Habryka is CEO and a confirmed evaluator. Platform fees and evaluator compensation make the funding service economically explicit.",
            "The Corrigibility Research Fund identifies Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as legal grantmaker and final approver. This is a documented responsibility beyond providing a platform."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
              "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
              "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
            },
            {
              "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
              "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y"
            },
            {
              "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
              "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
              "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-19"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "if-anyone-builds-it",
      "label": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The book by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares arguing against building superintelligent AI.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "A portable argument for public and political audiences"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/if-anyone-builds-it",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "if-anyone-builds-it",
        "name": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
        "role": "A portable argument for public and political audiences",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The book by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares arguing against building superintelligent AI.",
        "why": "MIRI describes it as central to its 2025 communications work; ControlAI promotes it in support of its prohibition campaign. This records adoption of arguments, not ownership of the adopting campaign.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI biography",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The book by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares arguing against building superintelligent AI.",
        "structuralRole": "A portable argument for public and political audiences",
        "significance": "MIRI describes it as central to its 2025 communications work; ControlAI promotes it in support of its prohibition campaign. This records adoption of arguments, not ownership of the adopting campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The book by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares arguing against building superintelligent AI. MIRI describes it as central to its 2025 communications work; ControlAI promotes it in support of its prohibition campaign. This records adoption of arguments, not ownership of the adopting campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI biography",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: promotes the book.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-promotes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
                "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Promotes the book",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-book-yud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI biography",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Nate Soares → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-book-nate"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nate Soares",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthor",
            "sourceName": "Nate Soares",
            "targetName": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "Turning an audience into political demand",
            "text": "Yudkowsky and Soares coauthored If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies . MIRI describes the book as central to its 2025 communications work, alongside public appearances and policymaker conversations. Its plans for 2026 included helping third parties use existing material with their own audiences, responding to news and maintaining relationships with allies and journalists. Those plans gained institutional muscle: by March, MIRI reported that its communications team had grown from five people to thirteen. MIRI's 2025 account · March 2026 update",
            "matched": [
              "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "11bc97d0012429645d8cc1961eebda73ac20fe8671ce25023c42d1acefcd3e63"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI biography",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "miri-tgt",
      "label": "MIRI Technical Governance Team",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "The team developing MIRI’s technical proposals for international AI governance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Translates policy aims into verification and enforcement designs"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/miri-tgt",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "miri-tgt",
        "name": "MIRI Technical Governance Team",
        "role": "Translates policy aims into verification and enforcement designs",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The team developing MIRI’s technical proposals for international AI governance.",
        "why": "MIRI describes collaborative annotated-treaty work followed by development of a formal agreement. The team is not an enacted regulatory authority.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The team developing MIRI’s technical proposals for international AI governance.",
        "structuralRole": "Translates policy aims into verification and enforcement designs",
        "significance": "MIRI describes collaborative annotated-treaty work followed by development of a formal agreement. The team is not an enacted regulatory authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The team developing MIRI’s technical proposals for international AI governance. MIRI describes collaborative annotated-treaty work followed by development of a formal agreement. The team is not an enacted regulatory authority.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "MIRI Technical Governance Team → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: developed formal agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-treaty-tgt"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Developed formal agreement",
            "sourceName": "MIRI Technical Governance Team",
            "targetName": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "miri-international-agreement",
      "label": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A proposed international framework for restricting and verifying advanced AI development; version 3 published in May 2026.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "A blueprint for proposed international authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/miri-international-agreement",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "miri-international-agreement",
        "name": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
        "role": "A blueprint for proposed international authority",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A proposed international framework for restricting and verifying advanced AI development; version 3 published in May 2026.",
        "why": "Its US–China council, oversight, research restrictions, inspections and conditional enforcement must be read with their safeguards. It is separate from ControlAI’s draft and the Sanders–Casar proposal and has not itself conferred public power on MIRI.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A proposed international framework for restricting and verifying advanced AI development; version 3 published in May 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "A blueprint for proposed international authority",
        "significance": "Its US–China council, oversight, research restrictions, inspections and conditional enforcement must be read with their safeguards. It is separate from ControlAI’s draft and the Sanders–Casar proposal and has not itself conferred public power on MIRI.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A proposed international framework for restricting and verifying advanced AI development; version 3 published in May 2026. Its US–China council, oversight, research restrictions, inspections and conditional enforcement must be read with their safeguards. It is separate from ControlAI’s draft and the Sanders–Casar proposal and has not itself conferred public power on MIRI.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
              },
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "MIRI Technical Governance Team → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: developed formal agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-treaty-tgt"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "MIRI Technical Governance Team",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Developed formal agreement",
            "sourceName": "MIRI Technical Governance Team",
            "targetName": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: collaborated on earlier treaty draft.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-treaty-yud"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Collaborated on earlier treaty draft",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "MIRI international AI agreement proposal",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3"
          },
          {
            "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "miri-anonymous-2021-donor",
      "label": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "An unnamed long-term supporter whose 3,001 MKR gift MIRI reported liquidating for $15,592,829.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Substantial institutional funding with an undisclosed origin"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/miri-anonymous-2021-donor",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "miri-anonymous-2021-donor",
        "name": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor",
        "role": "Substantial institutional funding with an undisclosed origin",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An unnamed long-term supporter whose 3,001 MKR gift MIRI reported liquidating for $15,592,829.",
        "why": "This record describes the disclosed gift, not an inferred identity. Its public spending restrictions can be examined without guessing who supplied it.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An unnamed long-term supporter whose 3,001 MKR gift MIRI reported liquidating for $15,592,829.",
        "structuralRole": "Substantial institutional funding with an undisclosed origin",
        "significance": "This record describes the disclosed gift, not an inferred identity. Its public spending restrictions can be examined without guessing who supplied it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "An unnamed long-term supporter whose 3,001 MKR gift MIRI reported liquidating for $15,592,829. This record describes the disclosed gift, not an inferred identity. Its public spending restrictions can be examined without guessing who supplied it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: reported 2021 mkr gift. MIRI reports $15,592,829; sale proceeds from the 2021 gift.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-anon-gift"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reported 2021 MKR gift",
            "sourceName": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "thiel-foundation",
      "label": "Thiel Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A foundation listed among MIRI’s past contributors.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Historical institutional funding"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/thiel-foundation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "thiel-foundation",
        "name": "Thiel Foundation",
        "role": "Historical institutional funding",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A foundation listed among MIRI’s past contributors.",
        "why": "MIRI credits $1,627,000 cumulatively, with matching support included under its methodology. This does not establish backing for the current communications strategy.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A foundation listed among MIRI’s past contributors.",
        "structuralRole": "Historical institutional funding",
        "significance": "MIRI credits $1,627,000 cumulatively, with matching support included under its methodology. This does not establish backing for the current communications strategy.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A foundation listed among MIRI’s past contributors. MIRI credits $1,627,000 cumulatively, with matching support included under its methodology. This does not establish backing for the current communications strategy.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Thiel Foundation → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged past support. MIRI reports $1,627,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-y-r-donor-thiel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
                "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acknowledged past support",
            "sourceName": "Thiel Foundation",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "The institution and the money",
            "text": "MIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years. MIRI's contributor list",
            "matched": [
              "Thiel Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "31932d145918d27ecc0b5cd2684e6cef3ccf4338228a00a73c1806d4fedaba10"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
            "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ea-infrastructure-fund",
      "label": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A grantmaking fund whose 2021 recommendations included $30,000 for Rational Animations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Early resources for audience development"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/ea-infrastructure-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ea-infrastructure-fund",
        "name": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
        "role": "Early resources for audience development",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A grantmaking fund whose 2021 recommendations included $30,000 for Rational Animations.",
        "why": "The fund’s stated rationale included attracting and deepening engagement with AI safety. This predates the present prohibition campaign and is not a grant for that exact campaign.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A grantmaking fund whose 2021 recommendations included $30,000 for Rational Animations.",
        "structuralRole": "Early resources for audience development",
        "significance": "The fund’s stated rationale included attracting and deepening engagement with AI safety. This predates the present prohibition campaign and is not a grant for that exact campaign.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A grantmaking fund whose 2021 recommendations included $30,000 for Rational Animations. The fund’s stated rationale included attracting and deepening engagement with AI safety. This predates the present prohibition campaign and is not a grant for that exact campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fund report describes an early $30,000 award to Rational Animations and an audience-building rationale.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-eaif-ra"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rational Animations",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$30,000 reported 2021 award",
            "sourceName": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "targetName": "Rational Animations",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2022 Q3 ledger grant for an online course.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-eaif-mooc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lists joint $394,968 grant",
            "sourceName": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "targetName": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "date": "2022 Q3"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rational-animations-notes",
            "title": "Rational Animations: writers, adaptations and sponsors",
            "heading": "4. Institutional seed funding with explicit audience-building rationale Primary fund-manager report: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations Published June 3, 2021. Section YouTube channel Rational Animations ($30,000), under Buck Shlegeris's grant reports.",
            "text": "EA Infrastructure Fund reports a $30,000 award to the newly created channel. The report calls this the Q1 2021 round, states April 2021 payout, and also frames aggregate totals as conditional on grantees accepting full awards. Preserve that report-level qualification rather than calling this a bank receipt.",
            "matched": [
              "EA Infrastructure Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "61ad8a33b176845309dc3186e29d5d5bc09a68768a140d8be5449a1d6b11ffcb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sabine-hossenfelder",
      "label": "Sabine Hossenfelder",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Science communicator whose September 5 video described rejecting an AI-risk sponsorship approach over proposed editorial requirements.",
      "aliases": [
        "Sabine"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "First-person witness to a disputed sponsorship negotiation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/sabine-hossenfelder",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "sabine-hossenfelder",
        "name": "Sabine Hossenfelder",
        "role": "First-person witness to a disputed sponsorship negotiation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Science communicator whose September 5 video described rejecting an AI-risk sponsorship approach over proposed editorial requirements.",
        "why": "ControlAI later identified itself as the organization involved. Her account and its response expose a practical question: what does a sponsor get to require beyond the ad segment?",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Sabine"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-controlai-sabine-offer"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Science communicator whose September 5 video described rejecting an AI-risk sponsorship approach over proposed editorial requirements.",
        "structuralRole": "First-person witness to a disputed sponsorship negotiation",
        "significance": "ControlAI later identified itself as the organization involved. Her account and its response expose a practical question: what does a sponsor get to require beyond the ad segment?",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Her report",
            "text": "In the supplied transcript at around 2:03, Hossenfelder says the prospective sponsor sought to specify the topic, sentences and references. She says she declined. The offeror is unnamed in that passage; she separately discusses ControlAI elsewhere in the video.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The later identification",
            "text": "On September 8, ControlAI’s Miotti and Winga identified their organization as the one involved and disputed her description. Their response describes communication through her manager. The underlying emails and negotiated contract were not published with it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ControlAI identifies itself as the organization that approached Hossenfelder; the parties dispute the requested editorial control.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-ca-sabine"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              },
              {
                "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Identifies itself behind disputed offer",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "date": "Video 5 September; response 8 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "heading": "The important update",
            "text": "In her September 5 video, Sabine Hossenfelder said an AI-risk organization offered sponsorship but sought to specify the topic, sentences and references. She says she refused. The offeror was unnamed in that passage; she discussed ControlAI separately. Her video, around 2:03",
            "matched": [
              "Sabine Hossenfelder",
              "Hossenfelder"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1514c9545bf58baef61ba9a990d83c92568663f762be2e0226b33aab62ba4d7c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "heading": "The point they dispute",
            "text": "Hossenfelder describes attempted control over what she would say. ControlAI describes standard sponsorship conditions, editorial input over the ad, and generally nonbinding review of the main script. Its stated conditions include no AI-company endorsement and a required citation to one of two risk statements. It says sponsorship is disclosed. ControlAI’s partnership policy and account",
            "matched": [
              "Hossenfelder"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1a5319f5e2cce7776d1874385681e3ecbf0f23690b89bf695cd96acd4657e4fb"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
            "heading": "Turning an audience into political demand",
            "text": "There is a direct connection to the incident that started this investigation. On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved in Sabine Hossenfelder’s disputed sponsorship approach. It also named Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Those are separate facts; they do not make every adaptation a commissioned campaign script. ControlAI’s account",
            "matched": [
              "Sabine Hossenfelder",
              "Hossenfelder"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1f7135ab3de3f434dc8c534efad46e631a6f60f8de171ab61ffc60b80341d7f5"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine",
            "text": "Separately, ControlAI's 8 September post, by Andrea Miotti and Max Winga , says it was the organization negotiating with Hossenfelder and disputes her account. The supplied Sabine transcript itself left her offeror unnamed while separately naming ControlAI as sponsoring other creators. The correct update is: ControlAI subsequently self-identified as the organization involved. Its post does not publish the underlying emails or contracts, and Paul is not named.",
            "matched": [
              "Hossenfelder"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "408698d64e19b490136404d38e70c9ef10c6ffeeccf2c7d471613dccb8d17d1f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "controlai-creator-outreach",
      "label": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "The campaign’s organized work with video creators, including paid sponsorship and unpaid assistance.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Audience recruitment connected to political mobilization"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/controlai-creator-outreach",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "controlai-creator-outreach",
        "name": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
        "role": "Audience recruitment connected to political mobilization",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The campaign’s organized work with video creators, including paid sponsorship and unpaid assistance.",
        "why": "Its own account links creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. The important distinction is between a published sponsorship policy and the actual terms of any individual negotiation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-controlai-sabine-offer"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The campaign’s organized work with video creators, including paid sponsorship and unpaid assistance.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience recruitment connected to political mobilization",
        "significance": "Its own account links creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. The important distinction is between a published sponsorship policy and the actual terms of any individual negotiation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The campaign’s organized work with video creators, including paid sponsorship and unpaid assistance. Its own account links creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. The important distinction is between a published sponsorship policy and the actual terms of any individual negotiation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Andrea Miotti coauthored the response identifying ControlAI and explaining its creator partnerships.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-miotti-outreach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Andrea Miotti",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthors public account",
            "sourceName": "Andrea Miotti",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "ControlAI describes a creator programme supporting its campaign for an international ASI ban.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-ca-program"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Runs creator partnerships",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Max Winga coauthored the September 8 explanation and is the programme’s listed contact.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-winga-outreach"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Winga",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Outreach lead; coauthors public account",
            "sourceName": "Max Winga",
            "targetName": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
            "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rohan-paul",
      "label": "Rohan Paul",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "AI commentator and publisher of Rohan’s Bytes, identified by @rohanpaul_ai and his own linked publishing accounts.",
      "aliases": [
        "@rohanpaul_ai",
        "Rohan’s Bytes author"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Commercial publishing and distribution of competing AI narratives"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/rohan-paul",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "rohan-paul",
        "name": "Rohan Paul",
        "role": "Commercial publishing and distribution of competing AI narratives",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI commentator and publisher of Rohan’s Bytes, identified by @rohanpaul_ai and his own linked publishing accounts.",
        "why": "He distributes AI-risk reporting alongside enthusiasm for accessible models and criticism of concentrated power. This inquiry did not establish a ControlAI or FLI commission.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "@rohanpaul_ai",
          "Rohan’s Bytes author"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
            "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI commentator and publisher of Rohan’s Bytes, identified by @rohanpaul_ai and his own linked publishing accounts.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial publishing and distribution of competing AI narratives",
        "significance": "He distributes AI-risk reporting alongside enthusiasm for accessible models and criticism of concentrated power. This inquiry did not establish a ControlAI or FLI commission.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Identity and business",
            "text": "This record concerns the publisher linked from github.com/rohan-paul and rohan-paul.com. It is not the IIT Delhi robotics researcher with the same name. His publication carries named commercial sponsorships; legal ownership and individual contracts were not inspected.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
                "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
              },
              {
                "title": "Publication business self-description",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/rohans-bytes"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "What he amplified",
            "text": "September posts circulate Coxon’s warnings and Anthropic’s assessment. Other inspected output recommends reading David Sacks and presents favorable local-model coverage. Repetition shows distribution; it does not establish sponsorship of those particular opinions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic alignment-assessment amplification, 9 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018"
              },
              {
                "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
              },
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A concrete framing issue",
            "text": "The August 18 edition’s headline says Astra reached a critical capability level; the body describes an inability to rule that level out. That is a consequential difference in certainty. It does not by itself establish deliberate deception or a paid policy campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "openai-stops-reinforcement-learning",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-stops-reinforcement-learning"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Recommends reading post. Calls post a must read; rejects inference of exclusive ideological alignment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sacks"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "David Sacks",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends reading post",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "David Sacks",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Identifies as founder and writer. Self-identification; legal ownership not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-founder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
                "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Identifies as founder and writer",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Circulates NBC interview. Attributed to NBC; not proof of adopting every conclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-nbc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jacob Coxon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Circulates NBC interview",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Jacob Coxon",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Covers models and quotes policy. Technical enthusiasm plus attributed quotation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Covers models and quotes policy",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Meta",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Circulates WSJ warning. Explicitly attributed to WSJ; content opening only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-wsj"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jacob Coxon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Circulates WSJ warning",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Jacob Coxon",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Quotes pause demand. Not endorsement, campaign employment or coordination.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sanders"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Quotes pause demand",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Circulates assessment. Does not establish employment or sponsorship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic alignment-assessment amplification, 9 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Circulates assessment",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Research through 12 September 2026. Scope: @rohanpaul_ai, Rohan's Bytes and rohan-paul.com. This is a research supplement, not a deployed website edition.",
            "matched": [
              "@rohanpaul_ai"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7774a4990b0283b306c20fcb2cbb8a4092766f1fff3fa539772da7e4eb78201e"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
            "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
          },
          {
            "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic alignment-assessment amplification, 9 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018"
          },
          {
            "title": "Publication business self-description",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/rohans-bytes"
          },
          {
            "title": "openai-stops-reinforcement-learning",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-stops-reinforcement-learning"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Rohan’s Bytes",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Rohan Paul’s AI publication, carrying news, commentary and disclosed commercial placements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "An audience and sponsored publishing channel"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/rohans-bytes",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "rohans-bytes",
        "name": "Rohan’s Bytes",
        "role": "An audience and sponsored publishing channel",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Rohan Paul’s AI publication, carrying news, commentary and disclosed commercial placements.",
        "why": "Specific sponsor labels establish placements in particular editions, not control over all editorial output. Amounts, contracting legal entities and payment records remain uninspected.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
            "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
          },
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Rohan Paul’s AI publication, carrying news, commentary and disclosed commercial placements.",
        "structuralRole": "An audience and sponsored publishing channel",
        "significance": "Specific sponsor labels establish placements in particular editions, not control over all editorial output. Amounts, contracting legal entities and payment records remain uninspected.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "Rohan Paul’s AI publication, carrying news, commentary and disclosed commercial placements. Specific sponsor labels establish placements in particular editions, not control over all editorial output. Amounts, contracting legal entities and payment records remain uninspected.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
                "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
              },
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 28 February 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pika",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Pika",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-domus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Domus",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Domus",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 22 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-tars"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TARS Robotics",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "TARS Robotics",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 July 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Toyo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Toyo",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 24 July publication,23 July edition heading; amounts/contracts/payment unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-limestone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Limestone Digital",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Limestone Digital",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Identifies as founder and writer. Self-identification; legal ownership not established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-founder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
                "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan Paul",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Identifies as founder and writer",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
            "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
          },
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          },
          {
            "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe"
          },
          {
            "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-pika",
      "label": "Pika",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed commercial placement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w35-pika",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-pika",
        "name": "Pika",
        "role": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 28 February 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Pika",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "The commercial relationships we can actually name",
            "text": "Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for Pika, 28 February , Toyo, 11 July , Limestone Digital, 24 July , Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August , and TARS Robotics, 22 August . These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.",
            "matched": [
              "Pika"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "616c04f2ac626fd308690f159c91c9b8c25e2b603f59372f7e6b9b1b368ab3eb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-toyo",
      "label": "Toyo",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed commercial placement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w35-toyo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-toyo",
        "name": "Toyo",
        "role": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 July 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Toyo",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "The commercial relationships we can actually name",
            "text": "Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for Pika, 28 February , Toyo, 11 July , Limestone Digital, 24 July , Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August , and TARS Robotics, 22 August . These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.",
            "matched": [
              "Toyo"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "616c04f2ac626fd308690f159c91c9b8c25e2b603f59372f7e6b9b1b368ab3eb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-tars",
      "label": "TARS Robotics",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed commercial placement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w35-tars",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-tars",
        "name": "TARS Robotics",
        "role": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 22 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-tars"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "TARS Robotics",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-uncensored",
      "label": "Uncensored AI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed commercial placement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w35-uncensored",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-uncensored",
        "name": "Uncensored AI",
        "role": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-uncensored"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Uncensored AI",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "The commercial relationships we can actually name",
            "text": "Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for Pika, 28 February , Toyo, 11 July , Limestone Digital, 24 July , Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August , and TARS Robotics, 22 August . These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.",
            "matched": [
              "Uncensored AI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "616c04f2ac626fd308690f159c91c9b8c25e2b603f59372f7e6b9b1b368ab3eb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-domus",
      "label": "Domus",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed commercial placement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w35-domus",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-domus",
        "name": "Domus",
        "role": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-domus"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Domus",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "The commercial relationships we can actually name",
            "text": "Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for Pika, 28 February , Toyo, 11 July , Limestone Digital, 24 July , Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August , and TARS Robotics, 22 August . These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.",
            "matched": [
              "Domus"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "616c04f2ac626fd308690f159c91c9b8c25e2b603f59372f7e6b9b1b368ab3eb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "jacob-coxon",
      "label": "Jacob Coxon",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "The named subject of warnings circulated by Rohan Paul; this record follows that distribution relationship.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Published commentary"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/jacob-coxon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "jacob-coxon",
        "name": "Jacob Coxon",
        "role": "Published commentary",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The named subject of warnings circulated by Rohan Paul; this record follows that distribution relationship.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Coxon’s public AI warning became part of the September policy debate. His initially reported assembly appearance was withdrawn, according to an updated Axios account.",
        "structuralRole": "A researcher whose warning entered public policy debate",
        "significance": "His public position and the organizations using or responding to it require separate evidence; reported attendance must track corrections.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "The named subject of warnings circulated by Rohan Paul; this record follows that distribution relationship. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 14 assembly correction",
            "text": "Axios updated its report on September 14 to say Coxon and the organizers confirmed he would not attend. The organizer homepage still lists him; the linked programme does not. We have corrected the earlier reported-participation edge and retained its original observation. This is a change in the reported plan, with an unresolved website mismatch, not evidence of his motive.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Updated Axios report",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
              },
              {
                "title": "Organizer homepage",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Organizer programme",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-coxon-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Circulates NBC interview. Attributed to NBC; not proof of adopting every conclusion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-nbc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan Paul",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Circulates NBC interview",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Jacob Coxon",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Circulates WSJ warning. Explicitly attributed to WSJ; content opening only.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-wsj"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan Paul",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Circulates WSJ warning",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "Jacob Coxon",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Axios updated its account: Coxon and the organizers said he would not attend.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-coxon-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI — corrected attendance report",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer homepage",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported withdrawal from planned appearance",
            "sourceName": "Jacob Coxon",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "The current warning cycle",
            "text": "On 9 September he recirculated the WSJ report on Jacob Coxon , attributing the warning about potentially uncontrollable self-improvement to Coxon. On 10 September he posted an NBC interview excerpt . He also summarized Anthropic's alignment assessment on 9 September .",
            "matched": [
              "Jacob Coxon",
              "Coxon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d95d2dcd39d237a0666577988dda31acda92d5e00d5a61808d3233ebb097b629"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "What would change this assessment",
            "text": "Targeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.",
            "matched": [
              "Coxon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "98ce2205f3b3a945417e049a053a3ad02c3fbdfd6ce1aad92d21b892ab789337"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon: bounded resignation and network check",
            "heading": "Financial record",
            "text": "The ProPublica-rendered IRS return for Good Ventures Foundation, EIN46-1008520, TAX YEAR2022, covering1July2022 to30June2023 and submitted15May2024, names JACOB COXON in PartXV3a Paid during the year. Amount USD20,159; purpose Long-Term Future Scholarship Program - Research Scholarship. Exact-name scholarship recipient match is verified in the filing; independent confirmation that this is the researcher has not been acquired. The earlier fiscal-year-endingJune2022 return had no Coxon text match. It is inaccurate to silently treat the TY2022 label as a proved calendar2022 payment date.",
            "matched": [
              "Jacob Coxon",
              "Coxon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "f5801e54edd05eb805c317ecf6e1072089c72f4a2c0b2074cfd925dcf3728d2b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon: bounded resignation and network check",
            "heading": "Forest and next discriminator",
            "text": "Most informative next records, if pursued: recipient confirmation and scholarship terms; actual advance briefing/communications arrangements; Coxon's next institutional role or funding; and whether policymakers explicitly use his testimony to justify particular operative powers. Broad acquisition stops at this bounded check. The existing consolidated explorer remains frozen.",
            "matched": [
              "Coxon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7909799b1834537eb8f03f664f56d9e5d9b52e13cff6adc18d4d239e9a041c4d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI — corrected attendance report",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer homepage",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "david-sacks",
      "label": "David Sacks",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "A public commentator whose post Rohan Paul recommended reading.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Published commentary"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/david-sacks",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "david-sacks",
        "name": "David Sacks",
        "role": "Published commentary",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A public commentator whose post Rohan Paul recommended reading.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A public commentator whose post Rohan Paul recommended reading.",
        "structuralRole": "Published commentary",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A public commentator whose post Rohan Paul recommended reading. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Recommends reading post. Calls post a must read; rejects inference of exclusive ideological alignment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sacks"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
                "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan Paul",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends reading post",
            "sourceName": "Rohan Paul",
            "targetName": "David Sacks",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "Evidence against a simple prohibition-campaign classification",
            "text": "On 17 August Paul called a David Sacks post a must-read . The short original embed includes Sacks's warning about the United States becoming an expensive closed-model island. This is positive recommendation of an anti-centralization argument; it does not imply agreement with all of Sacks's politics or prove independence from every conceivable sponsor.",
            "matched": [
              "David Sacks",
              "Sacks"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5131a3dae2c3277838c168670f29f9034aa5cf262925cfe80f70e689c198c5bd"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
            "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-limestone",
      "label": "Limestone Digital",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed commercial placement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w35-limestone",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-limestone",
        "name": "Limestone Digital",
        "role": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "why": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w35-rohan-paul-findings"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed commercial placement",
        "significance": "The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the records establish",
            "text": "A named sponsor in a specific inspected 2026 edition of Rohan’s Bytes. The cited relationship does not establish shared control, affiliation with ControlAI, or endorsement of every position in the publication.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 24 July publication,23 July edition heading; amounts/contracts/payment unseen.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-limestone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
                "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Limestone Digital",
            "targetName": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "date": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
            "heading": "The commercial relationships we can actually name",
            "text": "Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for Pika, 28 February , Toyo, 11 July , Limestone Digital, 24 July , Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August , and TARS Robotics, 22 August . These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.",
            "matched": [
              "Limestone Digital"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "616c04f2ac626fd308690f159c91c9b8c25e2b603f59372f7e6b9b1b368ab3eb"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
            "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
            "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-slimrock",
      "label": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Tallinn identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies and records donations through it, including £2.5 million to ControlAI’s predecessor.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Holding-company payment route"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-slimrock",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-slimrock",
        "name": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
        "role": "Holding-company payment route",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Tallinn identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies and records donations through it, including £2.5 million to ControlAI’s predecessor.",
        "why": "The vehicle connects a named donor to dated organizational funding. The ledger’s informal label has not been conclusively matched to the Singapore lender.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tallinn identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies and records donations through it, including £2.5 million to ControlAI’s predecessor.",
        "structuralRole": "Holding-company payment route",
        "significance": "The vehicle connects a named donor to dated organizational funding. The ledger’s informal label has not been conclusively matched to the Singapore lender.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two historical payments",
            "text": "The ledger reports £500,000 on 14 November 2023 and £2 million on 10 April 2024 to Secure Future Research. These are donor-reported disbursements, not evidence of payment for a particular creator or campaign.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Identity still to reconcile",
            "text": "The ledger footnote uses Slimrock Holdings. The property-financing account separately names Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.; common association with Tallinn does not settle legal identity.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 14 November 2023; USD ledger equivalent $615,850.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-control-2023"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£500,000 donation, November 2023",
            "sourceName": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports £2m disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 10 April 2024; USD ledger equivalent $2,546,200.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-control-2024"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Secure Future Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "£2m donation, April 2024",
            "sourceName": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "targetName": "Secure Future Research",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Tallinn’s donor-ledger footnote identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-vehicle"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Identifies as his holding company",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-slimrock-sg",
      "label": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A company identified by Lightcone’s Oliver Habryka as Tallinn-owned and as the lender financing its property purchase and renovation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Property lender"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-slimrock-sg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-slimrock-sg",
        "name": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
        "role": "Property lender",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A company identified by Lightcone’s Oliver Habryka as Tallinn-owned and as the lender financing its property purchase and renovation.",
        "why": "Lending creates repayment obligations different from donations. The instruments governing collateral, default and consent rights remain to be examined.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A company identified by Lightcone’s Oliver Habryka as Tallinn-owned and as the lender financing its property purchase and renovation.",
        "structuralRole": "Property lender",
        "significance": "Lending creates repayment obligations different from donations. The instruments governing collateral, default and consent rights remain to be examined.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Reported $20 million loan",
            "text": "In March 2023 Habryka described $16.5 million for property purchase plus $3.5 million for renovations, lent by Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. This is the borrower-side account; the executed loan was not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Keep the legal trail separate",
            "text": "The donor ledger’s Slimrock label is retained as a separate record until the exact entity bridge is resolved.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Habryka describes $16.5m for property purchase and $3.5m for renovations, lent by Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-loan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "$20m reported property loan",
            "sourceName": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Habryka identifies Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. as Tallinn-owned in his March 2023 financing account.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-sgowner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported company owner",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "Credit arrangements reveal obligations that donation totals miss. On 31 March 2023 , Lightcone's Oliver Habryka described a $20 million property-and-renovation loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. His 13 December 2025 fundraiser describes a separate $1.7 million FTX-settlement advance: Tallinn would pay half of future grant recommendations until $1.29 million had been withheld. This shows how an earlier arrangement can affect later disbursements. Loan documents, current balances, and consent rights remain unexamined; these terms cannot be imported into ControlAI's grants.",
            "matched": [
              "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd."
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9b7412a23d1efae5ac48d2336b4212259745b3763ce1a5b5cd33026985efc3ed"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-sfc",
      "label": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A grant-facilitation business whose September 2026 update identifies Jaan Tallinn as its primary client and explains its own leadership and decision rights.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Grant facilitator with separate governance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-sfc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-sfc",
        "name": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
        "role": "Grant facilitator with separate governance",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A grant-facilitation business whose September 2026 update identifies Jaan Tallinn as its primary client and explains its own leadership and decision rights.",
        "why": "It helps turn donor intentions into administered payments, while retaining discretion about work it will facilitate.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A grant-facilitation business whose September 2026 update identifies Jaan Tallinn as its primary client and explains its own leadership and decision rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Grant facilitator with separate governance",
        "significance": "It helps turn donor intentions into administered payments, while retaining discretion about work it will facilitate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who decides",
            "text": "The update names Ethan Ashkie as CEO and Andrew Critch and Eric Rogstad as owners and directors. It describes declining some proposed work over concerns about violence or inflammatory rhetoric; funders can use other channels.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Different from SFF",
            "text": "SFC’s administrative and ownership role is distinct from the Survival and Flourishing Fund’s recommendation process.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              },
              {
                "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SFC’s September 2026 update identifies Tallinn as its primary client.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-sfc-client"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Primary client",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SFC describes its work facilitating grants associated with SFF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-sfc-sff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
                "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Facilitates grantmaking",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
            "targetName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update"
          },
          {
            "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-vanguard",
      "label": "Vanguard Charitable",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The charitable intermediary named as recipient of Tallinn’s November 2024 contribution designated for the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Intermediary holding a designated charitable account"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-vanguard",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-vanguard",
        "name": "Vanguard Charitable",
        "role": "Intermediary holding a designated charitable account",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The charitable intermediary named as recipient of Tallinn’s November 2024 contribution designated for the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund.",
        "why": "The named payee and the intended fund are different parts of one transfer, not two independent donations.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The charitable intermediary named as recipient of Tallinn’s November 2024 contribution designated for the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund.",
        "structuralRole": "Intermediary holding a designated charitable account",
        "significance": "The named payee and the intended fund are different parts of one transfer, not two independent donations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Named account",
            "text": "Tallinn reports $786,994 through SFF on 27 November 2024 to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, for account A2003126: AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund. Account-adviser and grant-approval documents were not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The donor ledger names Vanguard Charitable as payee for the AISTOF-designated account.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-vanguard"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named payee for designated account",
            "sourceName": "Vanguard Charitable",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "A further route connects pooled grantmaking with creators. On 27 November 2024, Tallinn's ledger records $786,994 through SFF to Vanguard Charitable, designated for account A2003126, the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund. JueYan Zhang is publicly identified as running that pooled multi-donor fund. Frame's public FAQ names it as a lead funder, alongside the Long Term Future Fund. Frame describes both independent creators and an organization-amplifier track working to briefs. It also says funders have no role in fellow selection or editorial content. The grant agreement and particular downstream allocation were not obtained.",
            "matched": [
              "Vanguard Charitable"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "26758be8bc897ca1e50ac155b463bf02003318c4e0cbad3f9e134bfb512068f6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-jueyan",
      "label": "JueYan Zhang",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Publicly identified as running the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund, a pooled fund supporting AI-safety opportunities.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Manager connecting pooled capital with projects"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-jueyan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-jueyan",
        "name": "JueYan Zhang",
        "role": "Manager connecting pooled capital with projects",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Publicly identified as running the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund, a pooled fund supporting AI-safety opportunities.",
        "why": "A named fund manager is a more concrete place to examine selection decisions than assuming every project reflects the wishes of every contributor.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Publicly identified as running the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund, a pooled fund supporting AI-safety opportunities.",
        "structuralRole": "Manager connecting pooled capital with projects",
        "significance": "A named fund manager is a more concrete place to examine selection decisions than assuming every project reflects the wishes of every contributor.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Fund management",
            "text": "His public biography describes the fund as pooled and supported by multiple donors, and identifies his SFF grantmaking background. Its publication by Schmidt Sciences does not make that organization the fund’s owner.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Visible decisions",
            "text": "The public grant account records documentary and other project financing. Specific agreements, approval criteria and contributor rights remain separate evidence questions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Zhang’s public biography identifies him as running AISTOF, a pooled multi-donor fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-manager"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
                "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Runs pooled fund",
            "sourceName": "JueYan Zhang",
            "targetName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "A further route connects pooled grantmaking with creators. On 27 November 2024, Tallinn's ledger records $786,994 through SFF to Vanguard Charitable, designated for account A2003126, the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund. JueYan Zhang is publicly identified as running that pooled multi-donor fund. Frame's public FAQ names it as a lead funder, alongside the Long Term Future Fund. Frame describes both independent creators and an organization-amplifier track working to briefs. It also says funders have no role in fellow selection or editorial content. The grant agreement and particular downstream allocation were not obtained.",
            "matched": [
              "JueYan Zhang",
              "Zhang"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "26758be8bc897ca1e50ac155b463bf02003318c4e0cbad3f9e134bfb512068f6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "One new Tallinn/Frame funding result",
            "text": "Frame's public grantmaking.ai profile has an organization-edited “Grants Received” block updated July 13, 2026 . It reports “Jaan Tallin (DAF)” $20,000 , AISTOF/Jueyan Zhang $280,000 , and another AISTOF entry with amount hidden. Preserve the donor spelling in source data; the intended Tallinn identity is strongly supported by context but the specific DAF is unnamed. Akshyae Singh's public reply says the $280,000 was for Cohort 1.0. The profile names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes Frame selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. These are recipient-side disclosures, not bank receipts, grant contracts, precise payment dates, or evidence of a donor selection veto. Do not infer the hidden amount or collapse the two AISTOF records into a known total.",
            "matched": [
              "JueYan Zhang",
              "Zhang"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "67f40a90af1ff54e2e58f03b19b2cd0192df7fcf58c8a70f41926080eb6fa836"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-aipi",
      "label": "AI Policy Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An AI-policy organization conducting polling and public education, with disclosed fiscal-sponsor payment routes and historical support in Tallinn’s ledger.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Polling and policy communication"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-aipi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-aipi",
        "name": "AI Policy Institute",
        "role": "Polling and policy communication",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An AI-policy organization conducting polling and public education, with disclosed fiscal-sponsor payment routes and historical support in Tallinn’s ledger.",
        "why": "It connects philanthropic money to research and public framing of AI policy.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An AI-policy organization conducting polling and public education, with disclosed fiscal-sponsor payment routes and historical support in Tallinn’s ledger.",
        "structuralRole": "Polling and policy communication",
        "significance": "It connects philanthropic money to research and public framing of AI policy.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Historical funding",
            "text": "Three Tallinn ledger payments associated with AIPI total $442,000 in 2024: $10,000, $300,000 and $132,000. Published recommendations should be reconciled with those payments rather than counted again.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "What it does and how gifts arrive",
            "text": "Its public fundraising proposal describes polling and education. Its donation page embeds a Hack Club route; The Hack Foundation is a fiscal sponsor, not an additional donor of the same funds. Later fundraising totals cover a different period.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AIPI public fundraising proposal",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/support-the-ai-policy-institute-for-agi-preparedness-polling-and-education"
              },
              {
                "title": "AIPI donation page",
                "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
                "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports $10,000, $300,000 and $132,000 associated with AIPI in July and December 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-aipi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$442,000 across three 2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "AI Policy Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Hack Foundation appears as fiscal sponsor and in AIPI’s donation route.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-fiscal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "AIPI donation page",
                "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
                "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Hack Foundation / Hack Club",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payment route",
            "sourceName": "The Hack Foundation / Hack Club",
            "targetName": "AI Policy Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "AIPI donation page",
            "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
            "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
          },
          {
            "title": "AIPI public fundraising proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/support-the-ai-policy-institute-for-agi-preparedness-polling-and-education"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-hack",
      "label": "The Hack Foundation / Hack Club",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A nonprofit fiscal sponsor whose payment infrastructure is used by the AI Policy Institute.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Fiscal sponsorship and payment administration"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-hack",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-hack",
        "name": "The Hack Foundation / Hack Club",
        "role": "Fiscal sponsorship and payment administration",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A nonprofit fiscal sponsor whose payment infrastructure is used by the AI Policy Institute.",
        "why": "Administrative custody helps explain a payee name without mistaking it for the beneficiary or originator of a grant.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
            "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
          },
          {
            "title": "AIPI donation page",
            "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A nonprofit fiscal sponsor whose payment infrastructure is used by the AI Policy Institute.",
        "structuralRole": "Fiscal sponsorship and payment administration",
        "significance": "Administrative custody helps explain a payee name without mistaking it for the beneficiary or originator of a grant.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Sponsor identity",
            "text": "HCB’s branding guidance identifies The Hack Foundation, doing business as Hack Club. AIPI’s donation page embeds its payment route, and Tallinn’s ledger names it for AIPI-related payments.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
                "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
              },
              {
                "title": "AIPI donation page",
                "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Hack Foundation appears as fiscal sponsor and in AIPI’s donation route.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-fiscal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "AIPI donation page",
                "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
              },
              {
                "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
                "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Policy Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payment route",
            "sourceName": "The Hack Foundation / Hack Club",
            "targetName": "AI Policy Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
            "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding"
          },
          {
            "title": "AIPI donation page",
            "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-pause-global",
      "label": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A movement organization seeking a pause in advanced AI development by building public pressure, coordinating chapters and supporting organizing projects.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Organized public pressure alongside policy advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-pause-global",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-pause-global",
        "name": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
        "role": "Organized public pressure alongside policy advocacy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A movement organization seeking a pause in advanced AI development by building public pressure, coordinating chapters and supporting organizing projects.",
        "why": "Its own strategy explicitly connects public mobilization with policy work by MIRI, FLI and ControlAI.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI organizes public pressure for a pause in advanced AI development, supports chapters and provides small grants and stipends.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign coordination backed by conditional support",
        "significance": "Published stipend and grant conditions show how organizational priorities can affect recurring resources and future eligibility.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A declared division of labor",
            "text": "PauseAI names MIRI, FLI and ControlAI as policy and expert-consensus counterparts while describing its role in public and political pressure, coordinated national campaigns and responses to AI incidents. It rejects violence and dishonesty.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Operational authority",
            "text": "Executive and chapter leadership coordinate campaign themes with local adaptation. CEO and Organizing Director decide microgrants, normally below €2,000, with a letter specifying purpose, deliverables and schedule before payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI organization",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/organization"
              },
              {
                "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Resources and ambitions",
            "text": "Tallinn reports $30,000 in two 2024 payments. Roadmap scenarios of €3.5 million and €8.5 million describe expanded communications and possible new organizations. These are proposed capacities, not receipts or completed campaigns.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "An operational obligation, not just shared views",
            "text": "Stipend recipients sign agreements, meet regularly with leadership and must continue contributing in alignment with Global priorities. Microgrant rules require specified outputs and reports and connect completion to future support. These are published conditions; no individual contract or sanction was obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
              },
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: microgrants",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published rules assign approval to CEO and Organizing Director, with grant letters specifying purpose, deliverables and schedule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-micro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Approves small grants and deliverables",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published rules require signed agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-stipend-operation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI volunteer stipend programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Sets eligibility and renewal conditions",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI volunteer stipend programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PauseAI publishes funding scenarios for PR, narrative production and additional advocacy organizations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-roadmap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI expansion roadmap",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Proposes expanded communications capacity",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI expansion roadmap",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published microgrant rules connect future support to completion and reporting of agreed outputs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-micro-renewal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: microgrants",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Makes future grants conditional on delivery",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn reports $20,000 in March and $10,000 in November 2024 for Stichting PauseAI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-pauseglobal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$30,000 across two 2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PauseAI’s theory of change names Machine Intelligence Research Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-pa-miri"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PauseAI’s theory of change names Future of Life Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-pa-fli"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-pa-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "ControlAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "The clearest declared division of labor comes from PauseAI Global's theory of change . It names MIRI, the Future of Life Institute, and ControlAI as organizations developing policy and expert consensus, while PauseAI builds public and political pressure. Its strategy includes coordinated national pressure, directing politicians toward policy partners, and rapid responses to AI incidents. Its organization rules locate campaign and communications coordination with executive and chapter leadership, with local adaptation. These are explicit organizational intentions, not evidence that donors direct every campaign. The theory of change rejects violence and dishonesty.",
            "matched": [
              "PauseAI Global"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fc890a9abae60b22fb82a600cd67cc49a4289c721f9178cdfffd3bdcaa6f7c7d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
          },
          {
            "title": "PauseAI organization",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/organization"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "PauseAI Global, legally Stichting PauseAI, organizes public pressure for a pause in advanced AI development. It supports chapters, coordinates campaigns and provides grants or stipends for organizers. Its published strategy connects public mobilization with policy and expert work by ControlAI, MIRI and FLI.",
          "structuralRole": "Builds the organized public pressure behind AI restriction",
          "significance": "PauseAI supplies a function that research and policy organizations need but may not perform themselves: turning concerned people into sustained collective action. Its funding rules also show how priorities become obligations for supported organizers.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "PauseAI describes a division of work across the restriction movement. Its theory of change names ControlAI, MIRI and FLI as counterparts in policy development and expert consensus, while emphasizing its own role in public and political pressure. It discusses coordination across countries, common campaigns and responses to AI incidents. This is an explicit account of organizations trying to make their different capacities work together.",
            "The operational structure matters. Executive and chapter leadership coordinate campaign themes with local adaptation. Published microgrant rules assign decisions to the CEO and Organizing Director, normally for awards below €2,000. Before payment, a grant letter specifies the purpose, deliverables and schedule. Small sums can therefore support a distributed network of activities while preserving a common organizational direction.",
            "Stipends have continuing conditions too. Recipients sign agreements, meet with leadership and must keep contributing in alignment with Global priorities. Microgrant reporting and completion affect future eligibility. These are practical mechanisms for sustaining work and accountability across a movement, beyond shared views or a list of affiliated names.",
            "Tallinn’s ledger reports $30,000 in two 2024 payments to Stichting PauseAI. The organization’s roadmap also sketches larger funding scenarios for expanded communications and additional capacity. Its stated methods reject violence and dishonesty. The institution’s significance is the ability to connect funds, organizers, messages and political opportunities into recurring public pressure rather than relying only on spontaneous reactions to the news."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
              "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change"
            },
            {
              "title": "PauseAI organization",
              "url": "https://pauseai.org/organization"
            },
            {
              "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
              "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
            },
            {
              "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
              "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
            },
            {
              "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
              "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-microgrants",
      "label": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A small-grant process for organizing, communications, events and policy work, with named approvers and required deliverables.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Funding tied to specified outputs"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-microgrants",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-microgrants",
        "name": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
        "role": "Funding tied to specified outputs",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A small-grant process for organizing, communications, events and policy work, with named approvers and required deliverables.",
        "why": "Award letters and completion reports can connect stated strategy to particular products and campaigns.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PauseAI’s small-grant programme for organizing and related work, with named approvers and specified deliverables.",
        "structuralRole": "Funding that can be renewed or withheld",
        "significance": "Completion and reporting can affect access to further resources, making follow-through an actual condition rather than an inferred obligation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The paper trail",
            "text": "Published rules describe typical awards below €2,000, decisions by the CEO and Organizing Director, a grant letter before payment, and reports and receipts afterwards. Individual awarded letters were not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Future eligibility",
            "text": "Published rules connect future microgrant eligibility to completion and reporting on earlier awards. Award letters and applicant records would show how this condition is applied in practice; they were not obtained in this pass.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: microgrants",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published rules assign approval to CEO and Organizing Director, with grant letters specifying purpose, deliverables and schedule.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-micro"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Approves small grants and deliverables",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published microgrant rules connect future support to completion and reporting of agreed outputs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-micro-renewal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: microgrants",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Makes future grants conditional on delivery",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-roadmap",
      "label": "PauseAI expansion roadmap",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Conditional fundraising scenarios for expanding staff, public relations, narrative production and new advocacy organizations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed expansion of persuasion capacity"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-roadmap",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-roadmap",
        "name": "PauseAI expansion roadmap",
        "role": "Proposed expansion of persuasion capacity",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Conditional fundraising scenarios for expanding staff, public relations, narrative production and new advocacy organizations.",
        "why": "It makes planned capabilities inspectable; a plan does not show which campaigns were actually funded.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Conditional fundraising scenarios for expanding staff, public relations, narrative production and new advocacy organizations.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed expansion of persuasion capacity",
        "significance": "It makes planned capabilities inspectable; a plan does not show which campaigns were actually funded.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What additional money would buy",
            "text": "The €3.5m scenario includes narrative production, PR support, paid reach and public affairs. The €8.5m scenario proposes additional organizations including whistleblower support and incident-response media. These are conditional plans, not observed expenditure or proof those organizations exist.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "PauseAI publishes funding scenarios for PR, narrative production and additional advocacy organizations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-roadmap"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Proposes expanded communications capacity",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI expansion roadmap",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-cltr",
      "label": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A UK policy organization working on long-term risks, including frontier AI, which reports contributing substantial text to a government safety guide.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Philanthropically funded policy drafting"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-cltr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-cltr",
        "name": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
        "role": "Philanthropically funded policy drafting",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A UK policy organization working on long-term risks, including frontier AI, which reports contributing substantial text to a government safety guide.",
        "why": "It supplies a documented route from charitable funding into the preparation of government material, with government selection and revision still to be traced.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A UK policy organization, operated by Alpenglow Group Limited, that turns philanthropy-funded research into government guidance, submissions and proposals for AI institutions.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropic resources and policy design",
        "significance": "Its importance is the production of usable government ideas and text. Funding terms, access and the state’s decisions about adoption remain separate parts of the mechanism.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Recipient-side funding disclosure",
            "text": "Its 2023 report says all £470,224 received that year came from SFF. Tallinn’s ledger separately contains $4.466m across seven CLTR-related payments during 2021–2024. These overlapping records cannot simply be added.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Government drafting",
            "text": "CLTR says its AI unit authored the entire model-reporting and information-sharing section of the October 2023 UK frontier-AI guide. The government acknowledges CLTR among multiple contributors. Participation is corroborated; section-level authorship is CLTR’s account.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The document’s authority",
            "text": "The government explicitly describes a nonmandatory menu of emerging practices. Drafting input is not proof of an enacted legal duty or of exclusive control over the government’s policy.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A larger, dated funding commitment",
            "text": "In its 2024 annual report, published in 2025, CLTR says Open Philanthropy committed £4m over three years and separately offered matching of additional donations up to £3m. These are recipient-reported commitments, not proof of disbursement or a still-open matching offer. The report says grant commitments deny funders influence over strategy and priorities; the agreements themselves were not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "What funders are offered",
            "text": "CLTR’s current support page says it does not receive government funding and seeks unrestricted gifts. It offers funders tailored reports, expert access, advocacy opportunities and events. Such benefits establish an advertised relationship channel; they do not override the report’s stated independence terms or establish a donor veto.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR: support our work",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The institutional destination",
            "text": "Its April 2026 parliamentary submission proposes Cabinet Office AI coordination, an independent Office for AI Responsibility, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. Mapping these as recommendations makes the intended allocation of authority visible without treating proposed bodies as existing powers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Legal operator and research supplier",
            "text": "The organization’s footer identifies Alpenglow Group Limited, company 12308171. Its annual report identifies Public First UK as a commissioned pollster. Neither the similarly named dissolved company nor US Public First Action should be substituted for those entities.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR: about us and legal operator",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CLTR proposed AI governance architecture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Proposed government AI institutions",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "targetName": "CLTR proposed AI governance architecture",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports seven CLTR-related payments totaling $4,466,000 during 2021–2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-cltr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$4.466m across seven 2021–2024 entries",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CLTR’s 2023 annual report attributes all £470,224 received that year to SFF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-cltr-sff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "All £470,224 received in 2023",
            "sourceName": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "targetName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "CLTR reports authoring the model-reporting and information-sharing section. The government acknowledges it among contributors.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Claims section authorship",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "targetName": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "CLTR’s report published in 2025 describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment and separate matching up to £3m.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-cltr-commitment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "£4m commitment plus matching offer",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "CLTR identifies Public First UK as its pollster for 2,011 UK adults surveyed 28 October–5 November 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Public First (UK consultancy)",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Commissioned 2024 AI opinion poll",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "targetName": "Public First (UK consultancy)",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR: support our work",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR: about us and legal operator",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Centre for Long-Term Resilience is a UK policy organization operated by Alpenglow Group Limited. It turns philanthropy-supported research into government guidance, submissions and proposals for AI institutions. Its work makes the route from privately supported expertise to public policy unusually concrete.",
          "structuralRole": "Translates funded expertise into usable government policy work",
          "significance": "CLTR matters because officials need workable ideas and text. An organization that supplies them can help shape the choices government considers, while its funding relationships sustain the staff and expertise required to keep doing that work.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "CLTR works on policy for long-term risks, including the government arrangements needed to manage advanced AI. It describes an AI unit producing practical contributions for officials. Its April 2026 parliamentary submission proposed Cabinet Office coordination, an independent Office for AI Responsibility, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. These proposals make its preferred institutional destination visible.",
            "Its contribution to the October 2023 UK frontier-AI guide is a particularly useful example. CLTR says its unit wrote the entire model-reporting and information-sharing section. The government acknowledges CLTR among the guide’s contributors and describes the document as a nonmandatory menu of emerging practices. This puts an attributable policy-production relationship inside a public government output.",
            "The organization’s resources come through philanthropy. Its 2023 report attributes all £470,224 received that year to SFF. Its 2024 report, published in 2025, describes an Open Philanthropy commitment of £4 million over three years and separate matching offered up to £3 million. Tallinn’s ledger also records support across several years. These records reveal an institution with the backing to sustain specialist policy work.",
            "CLTR says it receives no government funding and seeks unrestricted gifts. Its support page offers funders tailored reports, expert access, advocacy opportunities and events; its annual report says donor commitments deny influence over strategy and priorities. The relationship is therefore worth understanding in its own terms: funders support an organization that produces policy expertise, and both officials and supporters can gain access to that expertise."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
              "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
              "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
            },
            {
              "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
              "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "CLTR: support our work",
              "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/"
            },
            {
              "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
              "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-guide",
      "label": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A government-published menu of emerging frontier-AI safety practices, with external contributors acknowledged.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government publication incorporating outside expertise"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-guide",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-guide",
        "name": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
        "role": "Government publication incorporating outside expertise",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A government-published menu of emerging frontier-AI safety practices, with external contributors acknowledged.",
        "why": "The provenance of its sections helps distinguish outside recommendations from official selection and eventual law.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A government-published menu of emerging frontier-AI safety practices, with external contributors acknowledged.",
        "structuralRole": "Government publication incorporating outside expertise",
        "significance": "The provenance of its sections helps distinguish outside recommendations from official selection and eventual law.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope and authorship",
            "text": "Published 27 October 2023 by DSIT; expressly nonmandatory. It acknowledges CLTR, FLI and other contributors. CLTR separately claims authorship of the model-reporting section. Drafts and correspondence would establish the precise editorial process.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
              },
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "DSIT published the frontier-AI safety guide on 27 October 2023 as a nonmandatory menu of emerging practices.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-publish"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Published nonmandatory guide",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "CLTR reports authoring the model-reporting and information-sharing section. The government acknowledges it among contributors.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-draft"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Claims section authorship",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "targetName": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-documentary",
      "label": "SB-1047 documentary project",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "A Michaël Trazzi documentary project with an AISTOF contribution recorded publicly on Manifund.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "A visible example of grant-funded media"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-documentary",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-documentary",
        "name": "SB-1047 documentary project",
        "role": "A visible example of grant-funded media",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A Michaël Trazzi documentary project with an AISTOF contribution recorded publicly on Manifund.",
        "why": "The project connects a pooled AI-safety fund to a specific production and declared communication aim.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A Michaël Trazzi documentary project with an AISTOF contribution recorded publicly on Manifund.",
        "structuralRole": "A visible example of grant-funded media",
        "significance": "The project connects a pooled AI-safety fund to a specific production and declared communication aim.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Recorded financing",
            "text": "The public AISTOF account records $41,162; the project’s Donations tab dates its contribution to 21 January 2025 and marks the project Complete Grant. The proposal describes interviews with proponents and opponents.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "What the record does not allocate",
            "text": "Tallinn’s upstream contribution to the pooled fund cannot be assigned to this documentary. Editorial approval or donor script control is not established by the payment record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The fund’s public account records $41,162 to the SB-1047 documentary; the project dates its AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-film"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$41,162 documentary grant",
            "sourceName": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "targetName": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The public project proposal identifies Trazzi as the creator associated with the SB-1047 documentary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-director"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Michaël Trazzi",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Documentary creator",
            "sourceName": "Michaël Trazzi",
            "targetName": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-trazzi",
      "label": "Michaël Trazzi",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Creator associated with the publicly funded SB-1047 documentary project.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Media production receiving a disclosed project grant"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-trazzi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-trazzi",
        "name": "Michaël Trazzi",
        "role": "Media production receiving a disclosed project grant",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Creator associated with the publicly funded SB-1047 documentary project.",
        "why": "A named producer connects the grant record to a particular output and proposal.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          },
          {
            "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Creator associated with the publicly funded SB-1047 documentary project.",
        "structuralRole": "Media production receiving a disclosed project grant",
        "significance": "A named producer connects the grant record to a particular output and proposal.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The project record",
            "text": "The Manifund proposal identifies Trazzi and describes the documentary’s intended contribution to discussion of AI policy, including interviews with both sides. The AISTOF grant is visible; a grant agreement allocating editorial rights was not obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              },
              {
                "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The public project proposal identifies Trazzi as the creator associated with the SB-1047 documentary.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-director"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
                "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Documentary creator",
            "sourceName": "Michaël Trazzi",
            "targetName": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "The fund's Manifund account records $41,162 for Michaël Trazzi's SB-1047 documentary. The project's Donations tab dates the AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025 and marks the project Complete Grant. This establishes media financing; the proposal describes informing AI-policy discussions while presenting proponents and opponents. It does not trace Tallinn's November contribution into this production or establish editorial approval rights. The meaningful connection is fund-level support for communication, with grant-specific conditions still unknown.",
            "matched": [
              "Michaël Trazzi",
              "Trazzi"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "cc517d083c8be5375a87b06775ae1f4847e9b62ce89dc1b68783e8ef14da915b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations"
          },
          {
            "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-tarbell",
      "label": "Tarbell Fellowship",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A journalism fellowship named as the purpose of two 2024 Tallinn ledger payments through Players Philanthropy Fund.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Support for journalism capacity"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-tarbell",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-tarbell",
        "name": "Tarbell Fellowship",
        "role": "Support for journalism capacity",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A journalism fellowship named as the purpose of two 2024 Tallinn ledger payments through Players Philanthropy Fund.",
        "why": "Programme funding can support reporting without establishing instructions for particular articles.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A journalism fellowship named as the purpose of two 2024 Tallinn ledger payments through Players Philanthropy Fund.",
        "structuralRole": "Support for journalism capacity",
        "significance": "Programme funding can support reporting without establishing instructions for particular articles.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Historical programme support",
            "text": "Tallinn reports two 2024 disbursements totaling $520,000, routed through Players Philanthropy Fund and designated for Tarbell Fellowship. This does not identify an individual journalist’s sponsor disclosure, story brief or editorial obligations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports two 2024 payments through Players Philanthropy Fund for Tarbell Fellowship totaling $520,000.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-tarbell"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$520,000 programme support in 2024",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger names Players Philanthropy Fund for two 2024 payments totaling $520,000 designated for Tarbell Fellowship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-ppf-tarbell"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Named payment route for Tarbell support",
            "sourceName": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "targetName": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-appg",
      "label": "APPG for Future Generations",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "A UK parliamentary interest group named as a purpose of Tallinn-related charitable payments in 2020–2022.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Philanthropic support adjacent to parliamentary work"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w36-appg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-appg",
        "name": "APPG for Future Generations",
        "role": "Philanthropic support adjacent to parliamentary work",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A UK parliamentary interest group named as a purpose of Tallinn-related charitable payments in 2020–2022.",
        "why": "A funded parliamentary network is a different mechanism from government paying an advocacy organization.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A UK parliamentary interest group named as a purpose of Tallinn-related charitable payments in 2020–2022.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropic support adjacent to parliamentary work",
        "significance": "A funded parliamentary network is a different mechanism from government paying an advocacy organization.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated funding route",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger records four payments totaling $251,000 during 2020–2022 via Founders Pledge UK, designated for the APPG for Future Generations. These are donor-reported historic payments, not government funding or proof of an MP’s personal receipt.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Four donor-ledger payments via Founders Pledge UK designate APPG for Future Generations and total $251,000 during 2020–2022.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w36-e-appg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$251,000 designated support, 2020–2022",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "APPG for Future Generations",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
      "label": "Josh Nelson",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Civic Shout CEO; signed 2022 FEC comment in that capacity and as Juggernaut Project cofounder. Also named on Foundation team.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Platform executive and nonprofit-audience strategist"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-josh-nelson",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
        "name": "Josh Nelson",
        "role": "Platform executive and nonprofit-audience strategist",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Civic Shout CEO; signed 2022 FEC comment in that capacity and as Juggernaut Project cofounder. Also named on Foundation team.",
        "why": "Civic Shout CEO; signed 2022 FEC comment in that capacity and as Juggernaut Project cofounder. Also named on Foundation team.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Civic Shout CEO; signed 2022 FEC comment in that capacity and as Juggernaut Project cofounder. Also named on Foundation team.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform executive and nonprofit-audience strategist",
        "significance": "Civic Shout CEO; signed 2022 FEC comment in that capacity and as Juggernaut Project cofounder. Also named on Foundation team.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Civic Shout CEO; signed 2022 FEC comment in that capacity and as Juggernaut Project cofounder. Also named on Foundation team.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Limits of the record",
            "text": "No LLC stake or beneficial ownership established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Executive and project roles",
            "text": "Nelson signed the 2022 FEC comment as Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder. The Foundation also names him on its team; neither establishes his LLC stake or formal donor-selection authority.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Nelson signed a 2022 FEC comment as Civic Shout CEO; current company posts continue to identify his leadership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-ceo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
                "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Josh Nelson",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Foundation team page names Nelson and describes his nonprofit-email and Civic Shout work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-nelson-foundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Named Foundation team participant",
            "sourceName": "Josh Nelson",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "The mechanism worth adding",
            "text": "Josh Nelson signed an FEC comment in 2022 , PDF page 9, as Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder; current company posts continue to identify him with its leadership. Elliott Golden's own professional résumé identifies him as Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder during 2016–2018; his résumé is not a current ownership register. Wide Eye's July 2017 project account describes working with Golden and Stand Up America on the earlier Messenger-based service. This older product history means generic listings claiming a 2018 founding or 2022 launch need qualification. Marie Bergen is currently named Head of Joint Actions on the official hosting page .",
            "matched": [
              "Josh Nelson",
              "Nelson"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fddf7936c80096a3dc0c33e91a0f733877371b9ee13fd9ab3b68780e847a96fa"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "A philanthropic route into audience acquisition",
            "text": "The fundraising page offers a $25,000 package supporting one nonprofit with 30,000 opt-in subscribers and consultation, and a $500,000 package for 20 groups in a donor-selected issue area. Its team page names Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden. This is an explicit way for philanthropic money to subsidize organizations' audience-building, with shared people between commercial platform and project. It does not disclose actual donor receipts, contracts, transfer pricing, grant-selection authority or private benefit. No claim of improper self-dealing follows.",
            "matched": [
              "Nelson"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "164fa3156301a482bbcce0fc11a2a99262d6cc2674ca4a481659be9dc7a48e18"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
      "label": "Elliott Golden",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder in 2016–2018; currently named on Foundation team.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Product design and audience conversion"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-elliott-golden",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
        "name": "Elliott Golden",
        "role": "Product design and audience conversion",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder in 2016–2018; currently named on Foundation team.",
        "why": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder in 2016–2018; currently named on Foundation team.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
            "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder in 2016–2018; currently named on Foundation team.",
        "structuralRole": "Product design and audience conversion",
        "significance": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder in 2016–2018; currently named on Foundation team.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder in 2016–2018; currently named on Foundation team.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
                "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Limits of the record",
            "text": "Historical role and current participation do not establish an equity stake.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
                "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical versus current claims",
            "text": "His résumé dates the product-design/cofounder role to 2016–2018. The Foundation separately describes current conversion-optimization and strategy participation. Those are different evidence states and neither supplies a current equity stake.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
                "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Foundation describes Golden’s conversion optimization and strategy work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-golden-foundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Named Foundation strategy participant",
            "sourceName": "Elliott Golden",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Golden’s professional résumé identifies this role in 2016–2018.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
                "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Historical cofounder and product designer",
            "sourceName": "Elliott Golden",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "The mechanism worth adding",
            "text": "Josh Nelson signed an FEC comment in 2022 , PDF page 9, as Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder; current company posts continue to identify him with its leadership. Elliott Golden's own professional résumé identifies him as Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder during 2016–2018; his résumé is not a current ownership register. Wide Eye's July 2017 project account describes working with Golden and Stand Up America on the earlier Messenger-based service. This older product history means generic listings claiming a 2018 founding or 2022 launch need qualification. Marie Bergen is currently named Head of Joint Actions on the official hosting page .",
            "matched": [
              "Elliott Golden",
              "Golden"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fddf7936c80096a3dc0c33e91a0f733877371b9ee13fd9ab3b68780e847a96fa"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "A philanthropic route into audience acquisition",
            "text": "The fundraising page offers a $25,000 package supporting one nonprofit with 30,000 opt-in subscribers and consultation, and a $500,000 package for 20 groups in a donor-selected issue area. Its team page names Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden. This is an explicit way for philanthropic money to subsidize organizations' audience-building, with shared people between commercial platform and project. It does not disclose actual donor receipts, contracts, transfer pricing, grant-selection authority or private benefit. No claim of improper self-dealing follows.",
            "matched": [
              "Golden"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "164fa3156301a482bbcce0fc11a2a99262d6cc2674ca4a481659be9dc7a48e18"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
            "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-marie-bergen",
      "label": "Marie Bergen",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named by Civic Shout as Head of Joint Actions on its current official hosting page.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Joint Action recruitment and host relationships"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-marie-bergen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-marie-bergen",
        "name": "Marie Bergen",
        "role": "Joint Action recruitment and host relationships",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named by Civic Shout as Head of Joint Actions on its current official hosting page.",
        "why": "Named by Civic Shout as Head of Joint Actions on its current official hosting page.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named by Civic Shout as Head of Joint Actions on its current official hosting page.",
        "structuralRole": "Joint Action recruitment and host relationships",
        "significance": "Named by Civic Shout as Head of Joint Actions on its current official hosting page.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Named by Civic Shout as Head of Joint Actions on its current official hosting page.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The operational role",
            "text": "The official hosting page names Bergen as Head of Joint Actions and invites prospective hosts to discuss fit with her. Published terms retain formal program discretion with Civic Shout.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The official hosting page names Bergen as Head of Joint Actions and directs potential hosts to her.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-lead"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Head of Joint Actions",
            "sourceName": "Marie Bergen",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
      "label": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Civic Shout LLC-operated project under Players Philanthropy Fund, according to its current legal notice. Offers donor-funded supporter acquisition and training packages for nonprofits.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Philanthropic support for audience-building"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
        "name": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
        "role": "Philanthropic support for audience-building",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Civic Shout LLC-operated project under Players Philanthropy Fund, according to its current legal notice. Offers donor-funded supporter acquisition and training packages for nonprofits.",
        "why": "Civic Shout LLC-operated project under Players Philanthropy Fund, according to its current legal notice. Offers donor-funded supporter acquisition and training packages for nonprofits.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Civic Shout LLC-operated project under Players Philanthropy Fund, according to its current legal notice. Offers donor-funded supporter acquisition and training packages for nonprofits.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropic support for audience-building",
        "significance": "Civic Shout LLC-operated project under Players Philanthropy Fund, according to its current legal notice. Offers donor-funded supporter acquisition and training packages for nonprofits.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Civic Shout LLC-operated project under Players Philanthropy Fund, according to its current legal notice. Offers donor-funded supporter acquisition and training packages for nonprofits.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "What donors are offered",
            "text": "Published offer: USD 25,000 supports one nonprofit with 30,000 opt-in subscribers and consultation; USD 500,000 supports 20 groups in a donor-selected issue area.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Named team participants",
            "text": "Public team names Josh Nelson, Beth Becker and Elliott Golden.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records do not establish",
            "text": "Not established as a separately incorporated foundation. No actual donor schedule, grant agreements, transfer pricing or improper private benefit established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Foundation’s current legal notice identifies Civic Shout LLC as its operator under fiscal sponsorship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Operates charitable project",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Foundation team page names Nelson and describes his nonprofit-email and Civic Shout work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-nelson-foundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Josh Nelson",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Named Foundation team participant",
            "sourceName": "Josh Nelson",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Foundation identifies Players Philanthropy Fund Inc, EIN 27-6601178, as fiscal sponsor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-foundation-sponsored"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsor disclosed",
            "sourceName": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Foundation describes Golden’s conversion optimization and strategy work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-golden-foundation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Elliott Golden",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Named Foundation strategy participant",
            "sourceName": "Elliott Golden",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "A philanthropic route into audience acquisition",
            "text": "The Foundation's current legal notice describes Civic Shout LLC operating The Civic Shout Foundation as a Players Philanthropy Fund, Inc. project , citing EIN 27-6601178. The older climate one-pager calls the sponsor a Maryland charitable trust; preserve this temporal/legal wording discrepancy rather than silently treating both descriptions as a current incorporation record.",
            "matched": [
              "The Civic Shout Foundation"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "635975b41890f353d6de59f144213ac0ec88cf8e6948a3a328a6bb4e683d1029"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
      "label": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor of The Civic Shout Foundation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Charitable fiscal infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
        "name": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
        "role": "Charitable fiscal infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor of The Civic Shout Foundation.",
        "why": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor of The Civic Shout Foundation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor of The Civic Shout Foundation.",
        "structuralRole": "Charitable fiscal infrastructure",
        "significance": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor of The Civic Shout Foundation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor of The Civic Shout Foundation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Limits of the record",
            "text": "Current project footer describes a Texas nonprofit corporation; older climate one-pager describes a Maryland charitable trust. Reconcile current entity form before treating either as an incorporation-record finding. Sponsorship is not ownership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The legal-form caveat",
            "text": "The current project footer describes a Texas nonprofit corporation; its older climate one-pager describes a Maryland charitable trust under the same EIN. This needs an authoritative current entity crosswalk; no ownership of Civic Shout LLC follows from sponsorship.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A separate journalism funding route",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger names Players Philanthropy Fund for two 2024 payments totaling $520,000 designated for Tarbell Fellowship. The Civic Shout Foundation independently names the same sponsor. These are distinct projects using charitable infrastructure; the record does not establish common editorial or campaign instructions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tallinn donation ledger",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout Foundation legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-ppf-tarbell"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Tallinn’s ledger names Players Philanthropy Fund for two 2024 payments totaling $520,000 designated for Tarbell Fellowship.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-ppf-tarbell"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
                "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Named payment route for Tarbell support",
            "sourceName": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "targetName": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The Foundation identifies Players Philanthropy Fund Inc, EIN 27-6601178, as fiscal sponsor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-foundation-sponsored"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
                "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsor disclosed",
            "sourceName": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "targetName": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "A philanthropic route into audience acquisition",
            "text": "The Foundation's current legal notice describes Civic Shout LLC operating The Civic Shout Foundation as a Players Philanthropy Fund, Inc. project , citing EIN 27-6601178. The older climate one-pager calls the sponsor a Maryland charitable trust; preserve this temporal/legal wording discrepancy rather than silently treating both descriptions as a current incorporation record.",
            "matched": [
              "Players Philanthropy Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "635975b41890f353d6de59f144213ac0ec88cf8e6948a3a328a6bb4e683d1029"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
            "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
            "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-bluevote-org",
      "label": "BLUEVOTE.ORG",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Political committee reporting two 2025 Civic Shout purchases totaling USD 1,500 for an advocacy platform.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Disclosed purchaser of campaign services"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-bluevote-org",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-bluevote-org",
        "name": "BLUEVOTE.ORG",
        "role": "Disclosed purchaser of campaign services",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Political committee reporting two 2025 Civic Shout purchases totaling USD 1,500 for an advocacy platform.",
        "why": "Political committee reporting two 2025 Civic Shout purchases totaling USD 1,500 for an advocacy platform.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Political committee reporting two 2025 Civic Shout purchases totaling USD 1,500 for an advocacy platform.",
        "structuralRole": "Disclosed purchaser of campaign services",
        "significance": "Political committee reporting two 2025 Civic Shout purchases totaling USD 1,500 for an advocacy platform.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Political committee reporting two 2025 Civic Shout purchases totaling USD 1,500 for an advocacy platform.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The two entries",
            "text": "Committee C00869040 reports USD 500 on 2 September 2025 (SB21B.4423) and USD 1000 on 24 December 2025 (SB21B.4424), both Advocacy platform. The original PDF pages 9–10 were visually checked.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Scope of the money claim",
            "text": "These are selected committee-reported vendor payments, not equity, complete platform revenue, a latest-amendment assertion or funding allocated to the AI petition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "BLUEVOTE.ORG reports USD 500 on 2025-09-02 and USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 for Advocacy platform, transactions SB21B.4423/.4424.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported USD1,500 in platform purchases",
            "sourceName": "BLUEVOTE.ORG",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-action-collective",
      "label": "Action Collective",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Progressive-action newsletter newly listed as participant in the Civic Shout AI petition.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Campaign distribution participant"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-action-collective",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-action-collective",
        "name": "Action Collective",
        "role": "Campaign distribution participant",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Progressive-action newsletter newly listed as participant in the Civic Shout AI petition.",
        "why": "Progressive-action newsletter newly listed as participant in the Civic Shout AI petition.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          },
          {
            "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
            "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Progressive-action newsletter newly listed as participant in the Civic Shout AI petition.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaign distribution participant",
        "significance": "Progressive-action newsletter newly listed as participant in the Civic Shout AI petition.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The documented role",
            "text": "Progressive-action newsletter newly listed as participant in the Civic Shout AI petition.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              },
              {
                "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
                "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Limits of the record",
            "text": "Distinct name and website from Collective Shout. Ultimate ownership not established.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              },
              {
                "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
                "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The live preview names Action Collective alongside College Democrats of America and Left Click.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-action-collective-participant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              },
              {
                "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
                "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Listed AI-petition participant",
            "sourceName": "Action Collective",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
            "heading": "Two incentive programs, different money",
            "text": "The AI petition preview now names Action Collective , College Democrats of America and Left Click as participants. Action Collective was absent from the selectively read existing profile. It is a third name, not Collective Shout. The page offers $2.25 in credits per referred signature, identifies Civic Shout as host, and plans committee delivery and follow-up congressional letters. Actual delivery, realized spending, participant instructions and congressional-office coordination remain unverified. The petition's AI-incident claims were not independently checked in this pass and should not be restated as findings.",
            "matched": [
              "Action Collective"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "1d66e750b0f2c267482b8b5cf40f27a7318fe492f79b161b04cb68623022bb89"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          },
          {
            "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
            "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
      "label": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Coalition petition program rewarding qualifying referrals with restricted advertising credits.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Noncash recruitment incentives and host list growth"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-joint-actions",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
        "name": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
        "role": "Noncash recruitment incentives and host list growth",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Coalition petition program rewarding qualifying referrals with restricted advertising credits.",
        "why": "Organizations can exchange existing audience attention for later traffic to their own petitions while the host grows its supporter list.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Coalition petition program rewarding qualifying referrals with restricted advertising credits.",
        "structuralRole": "Noncash recruitment incentives and host list growth",
        "significance": "Organizations can exchange existing audience attention for later traffic to their own petitions while the host grows its supporter list.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The exchange",
            "text": "Each valid referred action earns three national CPC clicks. Credits have no cash value, are nontransferable and nonrefundable, and can be used only for eligible petition/letter ads.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Decision rights",
            "text": "Civic Shout selects hosts and participants and determines validity, attribution and credits. Hosts may receive signer details. The host page says signers join the host list before seeing optional suggested actions; implementation and outcomes were not audited.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The AI petition offers USD 2.25 in advertising credits, equal to three eligible national CPC clicks, per qualifying referred signature.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Offers noncash referral credits",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Civic Shout retains discretion over hosts, participation, referral attribution, validity and credit issuance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
              },
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Controls Joint Action admission and credits",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The official hosting page names Bergen as Head of Joint Actions and directs potential hosts to her.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-lead"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marie Bergen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Head of Joint Actions",
            "sourceName": "Marie Bergen",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-affiliate-program",
      "label": "Civic Shout affiliate program",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A separate referral program that can pay a variable share of campaign revenue.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Paid distribution and optional platform credit"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-civic-affiliate-program",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-affiliate-program",
        "name": "Civic Shout affiliate program",
        "role": "Paid distribution and optional platform credit",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A separate referral program that can pay a variable share of campaign revenue.",
        "why": "This supplies the cash-versus-credit distinction needed to interpret campaigning incentives.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A separate referral program that can pay a variable share of campaign revenue.",
        "structuralRole": "Paid distribution and optional platform credit",
        "significance": "This supplies the cash-versus-credit distinction needed to interpret campaigning incentives.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Compensation",
            "text": "Qualifying email/SMS referrals can earn a variable revenue percentage subject to a portal-defined cap. Terms provide twice-monthly Stripe transfers or optional platform credits with discounts. No named affiliate payout was verified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "civic-shout-business-and-incentives"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Separate affiliate terms allow variable revenue-share compensation through Stripe or optional platform credits.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-civic-e-affiliate-operated"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
                "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Civic Shout",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Runs revenue-share referral program",
            "sourceName": "Civic Shout",
            "targetName": "Civic Shout affiliate program",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
            "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
            "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "label": "Marc Andreessen",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Marc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, personal political giving, public AI advocacy and a documented corporate oversight role at Meta. The records support several routes to influence, with different limits and decision rights.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Investor, director and public advocate"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-andreessen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-andreessen",
        "name": "Marc Andreessen",
        "role": "Investor, director and public advocate",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Marc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, personal political giving, public AI advocacy and a documented corporate oversight role at Meta. The records support several routes to influence, with different limits and decision rights.",
        "why": "His importance lies in connecting investable AI markets to political advocacy and corporate institutions. A fund's portfolio, a director's oversight and a PAC contribution confer different forms of influence.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Techno-Optimist Manifesto, 2023-10-16",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Marc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, personal political giving, public AI advocacy and a documented corporate oversight role at Meta. The records support several routes to influence, with different limits and decision rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Investor, director and public advocate",
        "significance": "His importance lies in connecting investable AI markets to political advocacy and corporate institutions. A fund's portfolio, a director's oversight and a PAC contribution confer different forms of influence.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The position he argues for",
            "text": "His 6 June 2023 essay advocates rapid AI development and diffusion, American technological leadership, and defensive uses of AI while rejecting AI-takeover fears. His 16 October 2023 manifesto attacks existential-risk and precautionary thinking. These are his arguments, not conclusions that settle AI safety or establish a relationship with a named safety organization.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Techno-Optimist Manifesto, 2023-10-16",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A personal political receipt",
            "text": "Right for America's Q3 2024 filing records $2.5m from Marc Andreessen on 24 July 2024 (SA11A.12495, printed p6). A16Z appears as his employer; it is not the named donor. This pass establishes one individual receipt, not his complete political total.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-rfa"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Authority at Meta",
            "text": "Meta's current roster identifies him as a director since June 2008 and a member of its Risk & Strategy Committee. The committee reviews technology, product development and partnerships and recommends how to balance growth with risk. Members serve at the board's discretion; these are collective functions, not a unilateral right to direct AI releases.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta governance roster",
                "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
              },
              {
                "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
                "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-meta"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Politics across company sizes",
            "text": "Andreessen and Ben Horowitz's 5 July 2024 Little Tech Agenda declares support for politicians according to their treatment of startups, regardless of party. On 1 November 2024 they coauthored AI for Startups with Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Brad Smith. Their declared defense of startups coexists with collaboration with an incumbent.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Little Tech Agenda, 2024-07-05",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-msft-policy"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "What remains unproven",
            "text": "The checked investment announcements do not disclose Andreessen's or a16z's specific vetoes, board appointments or safety-policy rights at OpenAI and Anduril. Funding and public advocacy establish interests and routes, not personal command of every portfolio company.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "a16z’s June2025 Open Source AI Grant cohort names Pliny, bringing independent jailbreak research into the firm’s public grantmaking. TIME describes an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant; whether it is the same award remains unresolved. The available records disclose no recipient-specific amount.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
                "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Andreessen Horowitz",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/about/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "pliny-andreessen-grant"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Current roster places Andreessen on Meta's board and Risk & Strategy Committee. Charter provides strategic review, recommendations and adviser-retention functions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-meta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta governance roster",
                "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
              },
              {
                "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
                "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Meta",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "director; Risk & Strategy Committee member",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "Meta",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Meta's roster records Andreessen as a16z general partner since July 2009.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Meta governance roster",
                "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "cofounder and general partner",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Schedule A p6 records Marc Andreessen $2.5m; SA11A.12495; employer A16Z.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-rfa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Right for America",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "personal political contribution",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "Right for America",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "TIME reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. This may describe the a16z cohort award already mapped; it is not counted as a second transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-reported-personal-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
                "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported unrestricted grant",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "text": "Marc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, public advocacy for rapid AI development, personal political giving and a corporate oversight role at Meta. The important connections run through institutions with different powers: investment funds, companies, political committees and government policy processes. A shared investor or an overlapping argument does not make those institutions a single chain of command.",
            "matched": [
              "Marc Andreessen",
              "Andreessen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5b0d1ef116e80c7d29fac33dc1a66850aff4762bf46956af6d77bdc0bd564d64"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Political money needs the correct donor",
            "text": "Right for America's quarterly filing dated 15 October 2024 , printed page 6, records a personal contribution: $2.5 million from Marc Andreessen on 24 July 2024 , transaction SA11A.12495. A16Z is listed as his employer. That field does not turn the firm into the donor. This is one checked receipt, not a complete political-spending total.",
            "matched": [
              "Marc Andreessen",
              "Andreessen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "063ddd616f29a5409ed54d7b398c3961966803184415793a066d390fac5480f6"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "pliny-andreessen-grant",
            "title": "Pliny, Andreessen and the grant",
            "heading": "Pliny, Andreessen and the grant",
            "text": "TIME’s August2025 profile reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. We have not established whether this describes the same a16z award or a separate personal instrument. The two graph connections are two sourced descriptions, not two sums of money.",
            "matched": [
              "Marc Andreessen",
              "Andreessen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "862a6bf776932fc7996fa7e1577aa03910ca40ff40ecd4c09500b1ff4da19b67"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Thiel, Anduril and a16z",
            "text": "Andreessen Horowitz publicly announced an Anduril investment on October 3 2019 in Marc Andreessen's bylined statement. It also emphasized defense and intelligence service as legitimate investment targets. This creates a historical investment edge from the a16z group to Anduril; it does not disclose the exact investing legal entity, present stake or voting rights. The existing dataset node a16z is labeled a16z Capital Management for a filed political contribution. Reuse that group-level node only with an explicit legal-entity caveat, or split it during editorial normalization. Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment .",
            "matched": [
              "Marc Andreessen",
              "Andreessen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "991c8347eb1999bed1a760ac8ecb95bb3cfebd8752d799183f5db80344715f46"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Techno-Optimist Manifesto, 2023-10-16",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta governance roster",
            "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
            "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
            "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Little Tech Agenda, 2024-07-05",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
          },
          {
            "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Andreessen Horowitz",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/about/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Marc Andreessen is a co-founder of a16z, a prominent advocate of rapid AI development and a long-serving Meta director. He links an influential public argument about technology to investment, political contributions and corporate oversight.",
          "structuralRole": "Venture leadership, political giving and corporate governance",
          "significance": "Andreessen matters because he has several practical channels for advancing his views: a venture firm, political donations, public advocacy and a seat inside a major platform company.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Andreessen’s position in this investigation is clearest when his public argument is read alongside his institutional roles. In Why AI Will Save the World and The Techno-Optimist Manifesto, he argues for rapid technological development and attacks precautionary and existential-risk thinking. Those arguments support a world in which the companies his firm finances can build and expand.",
            "At a16z, that outlook becomes investment and organized policy work. The firm finances AI, compute and defense companies, submits proposals to government and supports electoral efforts around technology policy. Andreessen and Ben Horowitz’s Little Tech Agenda says their political support will follow politicians’ treatment of startups, regardless of party.",
            "Andreessen also has a formal role at Meta, where he has served as a director since June 2008. His Risk & Strategy Committee reviews strategic priorities, technology, products and partnerships, and recommends how to balance growth with risk. That is a concrete institutional channel through which technological judgments enter corporate governance.",
            "His personal political activity includes a $2.5 million contribution to Right for America in July 2024, recorded in the committee’s FEC filing. The revealing pattern is the combination: argument, investment, electoral spending and board-level access. It helps explain how a position in the AI debate can be sustained by resources and institutions rather than depending on the popularity of an essay.",
            "a16z’s June2025 Open Source AI Grant cohort names Pliny, bringing independent jailbreak research into the firm’s public grantmaking. TIME describes an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant; whether it is the same award remains unresolved. The available records disclose no recipient-specific amount."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
              "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Little Tech Agenda, 2024-07-05",
              "url": "https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
              "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Meta governance roster",
              "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx"
            },
            {
              "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
              "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
              "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
            },
            {
              "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
              "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-right-for-america",
      "label": "Right for America",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "FEC C00867036; primary recipient filing documents Marc Andreessen receipt.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Recipient of Andreessen's recorded personal political contribution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-right-for-america",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-right-for-america",
        "name": "Right for America",
        "role": "Recipient of Andreessen's recorded personal political contribution",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FEC C00867036; primary recipient filing documents Marc Andreessen receipt.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FEC C00867036; primary recipient filing documents Marc Andreessen receipt.",
        "structuralRole": "Recipient of Andreessen's recorded personal political contribution",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "The Q3 2024 report records $2.5m from Marc Andreessen on 24 July 2024, transaction SA11A.12495. Only this receipt was checked, not the committee's complete allocation history.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-rfa"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Schedule A p6 records Marc Andreessen $2.5m; SA11A.12495; employer A16Z.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-rfa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marc Andreessen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "personal political contribution",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "Right for America",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Political money needs the correct donor",
            "text": "Right for America's quarterly filing dated 15 October 2024 , printed page 6, records a personal contribution: $2.5 million from Marc Andreessen on 24 July 2024 , transaction SA11A.12495. A16Z is listed as his employer. That field does not turn the firm into the donor. This is one checked receipt, not a complete political-spending total.",
            "matched": [
              "Right for America"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "063ddd616f29a5409ed54d7b398c3961966803184415793a066d390fac5480f6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
      "label": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Aggregate recipient scope in a16z disclosures; not one legal recipient. Separate individual committees before assigning disaggregated receipts.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Aggregate scope of a16z's crypto political disclosures"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-fairshake-network",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
        "name": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
        "role": "Aggregate scope of a16z's crypto political disclosures",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Aggregate recipient scope in a16z disclosures; not one legal recipient. Separate individual committees before assigning disaggregated receipts.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
            "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
          },
          {
            "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
            "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Aggregate recipient scope in a16z disclosures; not one legal recipient. Separate individual committees before assigning disaggregated receipts.",
        "structuralRole": "Aggregate scope of a16z's crypto political disclosures",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "This node represents Fairshake and affiliated PACs as grouped by the donor, not a single legal recipient. The disclosures distinguish firm contributions from non-additive founder ownership memo entries and disclaim control over spending.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
              },
              {
                "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake47",
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake26"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Dixon announces more than $23m additional funds for Fairshake and affiliated PACs for 2026 cycle.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake26"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "additional firm election-cycle support announced",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "May 2024 update says firm contributions to Fairshake and associated PACs totaled $47m.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-fairshake47"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
                "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "firm contributions reported",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
            "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac"
          },
          {
            "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
            "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-machine-age-fund",
      "label": "a16z Machine Age Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Manager announced $1.1bn raised 2026-08-28 for physical AI infrastructure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Capital pool for physical AI infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-machine-age-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-machine-age-fund",
        "name": "a16z Machine Age Fund",
        "role": "Capital pool for physical AI infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Manager announced $1.1bn raised 2026-08-28 for physical AI infrastructure.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Manager announced $1.1bn raised 2026-08-28 for physical AI infrastructure.",
        "structuralRole": "Capital pool for physical AI infrastructure",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "The 28 August 2026 manager announcement reports $1.1bn raised for chips, memory, networking, storage, data centers and other physical AI systems. This is a fundraising announcement, not proof that the entire sum was deployed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-machine"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Firm announces $1.1bn raised for physical AI buildout.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-machine"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announces fund",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "a16z Machine Age Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-volta",
      "label": "Volta",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "AI infrastructure company combining cloud operations and project finance; a16z announced Series A co-lead.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Compute access and project finance"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-volta",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-volta",
        "name": "Volta",
        "role": "Compute access and project finance",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI infrastructure company combining cloud operations and project finance; a16z announced Series A co-lead.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI infrastructure company combining cloud operations and project finance; a16z announced Series A co-lead.",
        "structuralRole": "Compute access and project finance",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "a16z announced a Series A co-lead on 4 August 2026. Its stated thesis concerns long-term creditworthy customer commitments needed to finance compute infrastructure. Actual customer obligations, check size and delivered capacity are not disclosed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-volta"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "a16z announces co-leading Volta Series A; thesis is cloud operations plus project finance to extend compute access.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-volta"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "co-leads Series A",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Volta",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Capital reaches the physical economy",
            "text": "The investment mechanism is particularly clear in Volta's Series A, announced 4 August 2026 , which a16z co-led. The firm's explanation identifies a financing constraint: costly compute infrastructure needs long-term commitments from creditworthy customers, while many startups are funded over shorter periods and cannot make those commitments. Volta proposes combining cloud operations with project finance to extend access. The announcement does not disclose a16z's check, customer contract terms or achieved capacity.",
            "matched": [
              "Volta"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "086205058f3b0c4cd09a90c9cecc46a4985d4980892d5300789d786e23c8ead8"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "Anduril Industries",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Defense systems company; recipient documents a16z/Founders Fund co-investment and OpenAI partnership.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Defense systems supplier and AI integration partner"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-anduril",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "name": "Anduril Industries",
        "role": "Defense systems supplier and AI integration partner",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Defense systems company; recipient documents a16z/Founders Fund co-investment and OpenAI partnership.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Defense systems company; recipient documents a16z/Founders Fund co-investment and OpenAI partnership.",
        "structuralRole": "Defense systems supplier and AI integration partner",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "Anduril's 17 June 2021 Series D release identifies a16z and Founders Fund as participants. Its 4 December 2024 OpenAI partnership describes models, Lattice and counter-drone data working together. The sources do not disclose investor-specific rights or demonstrate every promised deployment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-anduril",
              "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril",
              "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Combines OpenAI models and Anduril Lattice/CUAS data for counter-drone applications and operator decision support.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "announces national-security AI collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Anduril Industries",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anduril receives the other production award; together the orders cover eight systems over eighteen months.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-titan-a"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "U.S. Army",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$65m TITAN production order",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Marc Andreessen announced an Andreessen Horowitz investment in Anduril in October 2019.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-a16z"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Historical firm investment",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "December 2024 release announces data retention, AI training and deployment integration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership",
                "url": "https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lattice/Menace/AIP partnership",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anduril identifies a16z among investors in $450m Series D led by Elad Gil.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "participates in Series D",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The maintained biography identifies Stephens's Anduril role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-trae-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
                "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trae Stephens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder and executive chairman",
            "sourceName": "Trae Stephens",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anduril names Founders Fund in same Series D as a16z.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Founders Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "participates in Series D",
            "sourceName": "Founders Fund",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s"
          },
          {
            "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
            "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership",
            "url": "https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security"
          },
          {
            "title": "Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
            "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
      "label": "Founders Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Named participant in Anduril's 2021 Series D. Distinct from Thiel Foundation and Peter Thiel's personal giving.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Co-investor in Anduril"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-founders-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
        "name": "Founders Fund",
        "role": "Co-investor in Anduril",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Named participant in Anduril's 2021 Series D. Distinct from Thiel Foundation and Peter Thiel's personal giving.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named participant in Anduril's 2021 Series D. Distinct from Thiel Foundation and Peter Thiel's personal giving.",
        "structuralRole": "Co-investor in Anduril",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "The recipient's 17 June 2021 financing release names Founders Fund and a16z in the same $450m round led by Elad Gil. No individual check is disclosed. This firm is distinct from Peter Thiel personally and from the Thiel Foundation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Stephens as its partner.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-trae-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
                "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trae Stephens",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Partner",
            "sourceName": "Trae Stephens",
            "targetName": "Founders Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anduril names Founders Fund in same Series D as a16z.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
                "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anduril Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "participates in Series D",
            "sourceName": "Founders Fund",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
            "heading": "Capital reaches the physical economy",
            "text": "Anduril supplies another connection. Its 17 June 2021 Series D announcement names a16z and Founders Fund as participants in a $450 million round led by Elad Gil. This is co-investment in a company. It is not Peter Thiel's personal donation, and it does not demonstrate common operational command.",
            "matched": [
              "Founders Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "2e6e0b0df58faa4f43b76361145af1b07cb741ad403c91888477d8ddbb6c9500"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Thiel, Anduril and a16z",
            "text": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Trae Stephens as its partner, Anduril co-founder/executive chairman, and an early Palantir employee who led intelligence/defense and international-growth work. That is an independently documented personnel route connecting the firms. It is not proof that Karp directs Anduril or that Founders Fund controls Palantir. Founders Fund: Trae Stephens . The existing Thiel Foundation node must not be merged with Peter Thiel or Founders Fund merely because their names connect.",
            "matched": [
              "Founders Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "02be6598f69723804d2c0f13ca2707097a707535ca86fae25d5d1ba537715d21"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
            "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
            "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-ostp",
      "label": "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Recipient of a16z's March 2025 AI Action Plan submission.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Recipient institution for AI Action Plan proposals"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-ostp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-ostp",
        "name": "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy",
        "role": "Recipient institution for AI Action Plan proposals",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Recipient of a16z's March 2025 AI Action Plan submission.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
            "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient of a16z's March 2025 AI Action Plan submission.",
        "structuralRole": "Recipient institution for AI Action Plan proposals",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "a16z's formal 14 March 2025 submission seeks national model-development rules, state enforcement against harmful conduct, and infrastructure/talent support. The record shows what was submitted, not its adoption or causal influence.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
                "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-ostp"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Formal AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission seeks federal preemption of state model-development restrictions and compute/talent investment, preserving state harm enforcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-ostp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
                "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "submits AI Action Plan recommendations",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
            "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-ndaa-procurement",
      "label": "NDAA procurement reform advocacy",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "a16z campaign seeking commercial acquisition, acquisition workforce and autonomous-system procurement changes; final legislation not checked.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Procurement rules as a policy target"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-marc-ndaa-procurement",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-ndaa-procurement",
        "name": "NDAA procurement reform advocacy",
        "role": "Procurement rules as a policy target",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "a16z campaign seeking commercial acquisition, acquisition workforce and autonomous-system procurement changes; final legislation not checked.",
        "why": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "a16z campaign seeking commercial acquisition, acquisition workforce and autonomous-system procurement changes; final legislation not checked.",
        "structuralRole": "Procurement rules as a policy target",
        "significance": "The record identifies a specific function without inferring broader control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Documented role and limits",
            "text": "a16z's undated campaign calls for commercial acquisition, workforce changes and rapid munitions/autonomy pathways. The precise final legislation and outcomes were not audited. The campaign itself documents a concrete market-access intervention.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-defense"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current campaign names House/Senate NDAA provisions for commercial acquisition, workforce and autonomous-system/munitions procurement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-marc-e-defense"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "runs public procurement-reform campaign",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "NDAA procurement reform advocacy",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-alex",
      "label": "Alex Karp",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Palantir co-founder, chief executive and director, with a personal donation record and a formal share in collective founder voting.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Executive authority and collective founder votes"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-alex",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-alex",
        "name": "Alex Karp",
        "role": "Executive authority and collective founder votes",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Palantir co-founder, chief executive and director, with a personal donation record and a formal share in collective founder voting.",
        "why": "He connects an articulated political project to a company that integrates AI into government operations; each power has a different basis.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Palantir co-founder, chief executive and director, with a personal donation record and a formal share in collective founder voting.",
        "structuralRole": "Executive authority and collective founder votes",
        "significance": "He connects an articulated political project to a company that integrates AI into government operations; each power has a different basis.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Formal authority",
            "text": "The April 2026 proxy identifies Karp as CEO since 2005 and director since 2003. He participates with Peter Thiel and Stephen Cohen in a founder voting arrangement whose bloc follows matching instructions from at least two founders. This is not unilateral Karp control.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Political money",
            "text": "The inaugural committee's amended FEC filing records Alexander Karp's $1 million personal donation received on 17 December 2024: transaction F132.147400953, page 150, image 202505029758922685. It does not prove an exchanged favor or corporate payment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Stated project",
            "text": "His February 2025 book with Nicholas Zamiska argues for renewed cooperation between software companies and government, including defense and AI competition, according to its publisher. Treat the argument as advocacy rather than a contractual obligation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Publisher: The Technological Republic",
                "url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Scope of the inference",
            "text": "Palantir's integration partnerships establish practical routes into government systems. They do not establish Karp's ownership of Anthropic or OpenAI, command over Anduril, or control of individual military decisions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
                "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              },
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Karp is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-instruction-alex"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder instruction right",
            "sourceName": "Alex Karp",
            "targetName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Received 17 December 2024; FEC transaction F132.147400953; page 150; image 202505029758922685.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-inaugural"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$1m personal inaugural donation",
            "sourceName": "Alex Karp",
            "targetName": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Karp is CEO since 2005 and director since 2003 according to the April 2026 proxy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-ceo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder, CEO and director",
            "sourceName": "Alex Karp",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Publisher: The Technological Republic",
            "url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
            "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
            "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
            "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Alex Karp is Palantir’s co-founder and chief executive. He advocates closer cooperation between technology companies and the state, especially in defense, while leading a company that makes that cooperation commercially and operationally possible.",
          "structuralRole": "Founder authority, government software and political advocacy",
          "significance": "Karp joins a public political argument to executive authority, collective founder voting power and government-facing software. His significance is the combination of those roles.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Karp has led Palantir as chief executive since 2005 and served as a director since 2003. The company integrates data and AI into organizational decisions, including government and defense work. That makes him more than a commentator on whether AI should advance: he leads a business whose growth depends on institutions choosing to use it.",
            "His book with Nicholas Zamiska, The Technological Republic, argues for renewed cooperation between software companies and government, including national defense and AI competition. The program is visible in Palantir’s partnerships: commercial model providers and cloud infrastructure are assembled into systems that public agencies can buy and operate.",
            "Karp also participates in Palantir’s founder voting arrangement with Peter Thiel and Stephen Cohen. Matching instructions from two of the three generally determine a bloc of nearly half the specified voting power. It is a structure that preserves substantial founder influence as the company grows.",
            "His personal political spending adds another route into public life. The Trump Vance inaugural committee’s amended filing records a $1 million donation from Alexander Karp received in December 2024. Taken together, his executive role, voting arrangement, public argument and political giving make him a useful person to follow when asking how technology companies seek a durable place inside government."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
              "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
            },
            {
              "title": "Publisher: The Technological Republic",
              "url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
              "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
              "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A software company with collective founder voting authority, government purchasing agreements and integrations that place AI suppliers inside operational workflows.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government procurement and AI integration"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-palantir",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "name": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
        "role": "Government procurement and AI integration",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A software company with collective founder voting authority, government purchasing agreements and integrations that place AI suppliers inside operational workflows.",
        "why": "Its role combines corporate decision rights with access to accredited environments, while customers and suppliers retain countervailing rights.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A software company with collective founder voting authority, government purchasing agreements and integrations that place AI suppliers inside operational workflows.",
        "structuralRole": "Government procurement and AI integration",
        "significance": "Its role combines corporate decision rights with access to accredited environments, while customers and suppliers retain countervailing rights.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Founder voting is collective",
            "text": "Class F generally tops specified founder-related voting up to 49.999999%, subject to an ownership threshold. It is not an additional 49.999999% on top of the same A/B votes. Matching instructions from two of three founders determine the bloc.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Government business and buyer power",
            "text": "The June 2026 filing reports 52% of first-half revenue from government customers and about $1.5 billion from U.S. government customers. The category is broader than defense. Government rights can include termination for convenience, declining options or orders, and cancellation when appropriations disappear.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Purchasing capacity is not spending",
            "text": "The Army's July 2025 agreement has a $10 billion maximum over up to ten years; the Army explicitly states that it creates no specific obligation or commitment. September 2026 TITAN orders separately allocate $127 million to Palantir and $65 million to Anduril.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
              },
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "AI distribution and its limits",
            "text": "The company announced Microsoft/Azure OpenAI integration and, separately, Claude access via AWS-supported IL6 infrastructure. These are supplier and implementation relationships, not ownership or command. Individual deployment continuity remains unresolved after the 2026 Anthropic dispute.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
                "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Subject to its threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999%.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-votes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Class F voting mechanism",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The November 2024 issuer release combines Claude, AIP, SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-claude"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Claude integration announced",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Palantir's year-end 2025 LD-203 separately names the Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-pac"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named PAC in corporate filing",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Foundry/AIP integration with Azure cloud and Azure OpenAI models was announced in August 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-ms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
                "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Classified AI integration announced",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Microsoft",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The Army's September announcement identifies this Palantir award; Palantir leads production.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-titan-p"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "U.S. Army",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$127m TITAN production order",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LD-203 lists a self-contribution on 16 December 2025 under presidential-library expenses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-reagan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$50,000 corporate contribution",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "December 2024 release announces data retention, AI training and deployment integration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership",
                "url": "https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anduril Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lattice/Menace/AIP partnership",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Acquisition finalized 25 March 2025 for Allied Command Operations; announced 14 April.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-nato"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
                "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "NATO Communications and Information Agency",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acquired MSS NATO",
            "sourceName": "NATO Communications and Information Agency",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
            "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
            "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
            "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership",
            "url": "https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
            "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system"
          },
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
            "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
            "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
            "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Palantir builds software that puts data analysis and AI into government and commercial workflows. It is a consequential meeting point between the companies producing models, the cloud providers hosting them, and public agencies buying operational capability.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects AI suppliers to government operations",
          "significance": "Palantir sits at the point where an AI product becomes part of an institution’s daily operations. Its partnerships, government contracts and founder voting arrangement connect commercial access with public purchasing power.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Palantir’s importance comes from implementation. A government does not acquire a working intelligence or defense system simply by buying access to a language model. It needs software, data integration and an environment approved for the task. Palantir helps assemble those pieces, giving it a practical position between model makers and government customers.",
            "Its announced partnerships bring Azure OpenAI services through Microsoft and Claude through AWS-supported government infrastructure into that environment. In the first half of 2026, government customers supplied 52% of Palantir’s revenue. The Army’s enterprise agreement provides up to $10 billion of purchasing capacity over as many as ten years; actual orders are what turn that capacity into business. September 2026 TITAN production orders allocated $127 million to Palantir and $65 million to Anduril.",
            "Inside the company, Alex Karp, Peter Thiel and Stephen Cohen retain a powerful collective voting arrangement. Class F shares generally bring the specified founder voting bloc to 49.999999%, subject to the ownership threshold. Matching instructions from at least two founders determine how the bloc votes. That gives the founders durable influence even as the company sells shares to the public.",
            "The relationship with the state runs both ways. Palantir gets a large market and a role inside important workflows; agencies retain purchasing, appropriation and termination powers. The 2026 dispute over Anthropic’s defense use makes this bargaining especially visible: model suppliers, integrators and government customers can want different limits on the same technology."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
              "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
            },
            {
              "title": "Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q",
              "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm"
            },
            {
              "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
              "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
            },
            {
              "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
              "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
              "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
              "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-12"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-thiel",
      "label": "Peter Thiel",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Palantir co-founder and chairman, and one of the three current founder-voting participants.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Chairmanship and collective voting rights"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-thiel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-thiel",
        "name": "Peter Thiel",
        "role": "Chairmanship and collective voting rights",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Palantir co-founder and chairman, and one of the three current founder-voting participants.",
        "why": "A direct formal relationship to Karp and Palantir exists without relying on inferred political alignment.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Palantir co-founder and chairman, and one of the three current founder-voting participants.",
        "structuralRole": "Chairmanship and collective voting rights",
        "significance": "A direct formal relationship to Karp and Palantir exists without relying on inferred political alignment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The filed role",
            "text": "The April 2026 proxy identifies Thiel as chairman and co-founder. Two matching founder instructions govern the trust bloc; his position should not be rendered as individual majority ownership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Entity boundary",
            "text": "Peter Thiel is a person, distinct from the existing Thiel Foundation node and from Founders Fund. The common names do not make those organizations interchangeable.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Thiel is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-instruction-thiel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder instruction right",
            "sourceName": "Peter Thiel",
            "targetName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The April 2026 proxy identifies Thiel's formal board role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-chair"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder and chairman",
            "sourceName": "Peter Thiel",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Who can decide at Palantir",
            "text": "The April 24, 2026 proxy identifies Karp as co-founder, CEO since 2005 and director since 2003; Peter Thiel is co-founder/chairman; Stephen Cohen is co-founder/president/director. Class A has one vote per share and Class B ten. All Class F stock sits in the Founder Voting Trust. Subject to the 100 million equity-security threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999% for a matter. It is not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes. All three founders remain parties; matching instructions from at least two determine the bloc. Without matching instructions the specified votes abstain/withhold; the trustee has no voting discretion. This establishes unusual collective founder authority, not Karp's unilateral majority control. Beneficial-ownership tables also include exercisable options and conditional awards, so their holdings should not be relabeled as present votes. Palantir 2026 DEF 14A .",
            "matched": [
              "Peter Thiel"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aa70dd794b290b3aa0b46fa3dffec9185ce19cb5570b05064d063249f741195f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-cohen",
      "label": "Stephen Cohen",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Palantir co-founder, president and director; the third participant in its founder-voting arrangement.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Executive and collective voting participant"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-cohen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-cohen",
        "name": "Stephen Cohen",
        "role": "Executive and collective voting participant",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Palantir co-founder, president and director; the third participant in its founder-voting arrangement.",
        "why": "He is part of the decision rule, not a dispensable name in a Karp–Thiel story.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Palantir co-founder, president and director; the third participant in its founder-voting arrangement.",
        "structuralRole": "Executive and collective voting participant",
        "significance": "He is part of the decision rule, not a dispensable name in a Karp–Thiel story.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Voting participation",
            "text": "All three founders remain party to the agreement according to the April 2026 proxy. The bloc follows at least two matching instructions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Cohen is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-instruction-cohen"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder instruction right",
            "sourceName": "Stephen Cohen",
            "targetName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Cohen holds these roles in the April 2026 proxy.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-president"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder, president and director",
            "sourceName": "Stephen Cohen",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Who can decide at Palantir",
            "text": "The April 24, 2026 proxy identifies Karp as co-founder, CEO since 2005 and director since 2003; Peter Thiel is co-founder/chairman; Stephen Cohen is co-founder/president/director. Class A has one vote per share and Class B ten. All Class F stock sits in the Founder Voting Trust. Subject to the 100 million equity-security threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999% for a matter. It is not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes. All three founders remain parties; matching instructions from at least two determine the bloc. Without matching instructions the specified votes abstain/withhold; the trustee has no voting discretion. This establishes unusual collective founder authority, not Karp's unilateral majority control. Beneficial-ownership tables also include exercisable options and conditional awards, so their holdings should not be relabeled as present votes. Palantir 2026 DEF 14A .",
            "matched": [
              "Stephen Cohen",
              "Cohen"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aa70dd794b290b3aa0b46fa3dffec9185ce19cb5570b05064d063249f741195f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-trust",
      "label": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Holder of Class F shares, with votes directed by a defined collective founder rule.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Concentrated voting mechanism"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-trust",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-trust",
        "name": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
        "role": "Concentrated voting mechanism",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Holder of Class F shares, with votes directed by a defined collective founder rule.",
        "why": "The decision rule identifies who can direct the bloc and prevents double-counting its votes.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Holder of Class F shares, with votes directed by a defined collective founder rule.",
        "structuralRole": "Concentrated voting mechanism",
        "significance": "The decision rule identifies who can direct the bloc and prevents double-counting its votes.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How instructions work",
            "text": "At least two matching instructions from Karp, Thiel and Cohen determine the bloc. Without matching instructions, the specified votes abstain or withhold. The trustee has no voting discretion.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Subject to its threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999%.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-votes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Class F voting mechanism",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Cohen is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-instruction-cohen"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Stephen Cohen",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder instruction right",
            "sourceName": "Stephen Cohen",
            "targetName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Thiel is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-instruction-thiel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Peter Thiel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder instruction right",
            "sourceName": "Peter Thiel",
            "targetName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Karp is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-instruction-alex"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alex Karp",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder instruction right",
            "sourceName": "Alex Karp",
            "targetName": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-usg",
      "label": "Palantir USG Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The legal counterparty named in the selected Maven contract announcements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Named Maven contractor"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-usg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-usg",
        "name": "Palantir USG Inc.",
        "role": "Named Maven contractor",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The legal counterparty named in the selected Maven contract announcements.",
        "why": "The contract record names this entity; it is retained separately from Palantir Technologies Inc.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
            "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
            "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The legal counterparty named in the selected Maven contract announcements.",
        "structuralRole": "Named Maven contractor",
        "significance": "The contract record names this entity; it is retained separately from Palantir Technologies Inc.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated awards",
            "text": "The May 2024 notice announces $480 million under W911QX-24-D-0012. A modification awarded 20 May 2025 adds $795 million capacity; both say funding is determined with each order.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
                "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
                "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "P00005, awarded 20 May 2025 and announced the next day, adds software-license capacity under the same contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-maven-mod"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
                "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "U.S. Army",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$795m Maven modification",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir USG Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "May 2024 announcement: W911QX-24-D-0012; one bid; estimated completion 28 May 2029.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-maven-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
                "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "U.S. Army",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$480m Maven contract capacity",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir USG Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
            "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
            "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-army",
      "label": "U.S. Army",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Purchasing and contracting authority for the selected Palantir and TITAN agreements.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Buyer allocating contract capacity and orders"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-army",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-army",
        "name": "U.S. Army",
        "role": "Buyer allocating contract capacity and orders",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Purchasing and contracting authority for the selected Palantir and TITAN agreements.",
        "why": "Its order and renewal discretion is distinct from corporate founder authority.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
            "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Purchasing and contracting authority for the selected Palantir and TITAN agreements.",
        "structuralRole": "Buyer allocating contract capacity and orders",
        "significance": "Its order and renewal discretion is distinct from corporate founder authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Purchasing choices",
            "text": "The $10 billion enterprise agreement is optional purchasing capacity. The August 2026 TITAN production orders are separate specified award values, not payment records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
              },
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "P00005, awarded 20 May 2025 and announced the next day, adds software-license capacity under the same contract.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-maven-mod"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
                "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir USG Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$795m Maven modification",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir USG Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anduril receives the other production award; together the orders cover eight systems over eighteen months.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-titan-a"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anduril Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$65m TITAN production order",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The Army's September announcement identifies this Palantir award; Palantir leads production.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-titan-p"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
                "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$127m TITAN production order",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "May 2024 announcement: W911QX-24-D-0012; one bid; estimated completion 28 May 2029.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-maven-first"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
                "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir USG Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$480m Maven contract capacity",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir USG Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The July 2025 enterprise agreement consolidates 75 contracts for up to ten years.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-army-ea"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
                "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Up to $10bn purchasing capacity",
            "sourceName": "U.S. Army",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
            "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
            "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
            "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-dow",
      "label": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Defense department named as DoD in historical contracts and DoW in the 2026 litigation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Government customer with bounded procurement powers"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-dow",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-dow",
        "name": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
        "role": "Government customer with bounded procurement powers",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Defense department named as DoD in historical contracts and DoW in the 2026 litigation.",
        "why": "Courts distinguish lawful supplier choice from unlawful retaliation and designation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
            "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Defense department named as DoD in historical contracts and DoW in the 2026 litigation.",
        "structuralRole": "Government customer with bounded procurement powers",
        "significance": "Courts distinguish lawful supplier choice from unlawful retaliation and designation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Lawful choice preserved",
            "text": "The August 2026 final-relief order does not require use of Anthropic and expressly permits lawful transition to another provider, while vacating the challenged designation and broad contractor boycott.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The court's factual account describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual, without Anthropic visibility into DoW prompts or technical intervention in deployed behavior.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
                "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Contractual use limits; no technical veto",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph 14 expressly allows lawful transition to another AI provider and does not require continued Anthropic use.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-court-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lawful supplier choice preserved",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "targetName": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
            "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
            "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-aws",
      "label": "Amazon Web Services",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Cloud provider named in the Anthropic–Palantir Claude integration.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Hosting and model access infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-aws",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-aws",
        "name": "Amazon Web Services",
        "role": "Hosting and model access infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Cloud provider named in the Anthropic–Palantir Claude integration.",
        "why": "Infrastructure participation is separate from ownership or operational military authority.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
            "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Cloud provider named in the Anthropic–Palantir Claude integration.",
        "structuralRole": "Hosting and model access infrastructure",
        "significance": "Infrastructure participation is separate from ownership or operational military authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Named deployment route",
            "text": "The November 2024 company announcement combines AIP, SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment for Claude access.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "AWS infrastructure is named in the Claude integration announcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-aws"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
                "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosting and SageMaker route",
            "sourceName": "Amazon Web Services",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
            "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-pfcs",
      "label": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "FedRAMP-listed cloud offering, identifier FR2434554673.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Accredited federal access infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-pfcs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-pfcs",
        "name": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service",
        "role": "Accredited federal access infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FedRAMP-listed cloud offering, identifier FR2434554673.",
        "why": "A certification enables a route into government work; it is not approval of every model use.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
            "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FedRAMP-listed cloud offering, identifier FR2434554673.",
        "structuralRole": "Accredited federal access infrastructure",
        "significance": "A certification enables a route into government work; it is not approval of every model use.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Current listing",
            "text": "Observed 12 September 2026: certified since 19 November 2024; Rev5 Class D (High); ongoing certification; 20 ATO/ATU letters. This is distinct from an IL6 determination.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
                "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official listing FR2434554673: certified since 19 November 2024; current Rev5 Class D High.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-fedramp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
                "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "FedRAMP",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Federal cloud certification",
            "sourceName": "FedRAMP",
            "targetName": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
            "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-fedramp",
      "label": "FedRAMP",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Federal cloud certification program.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Authorization infrastructure"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-fedramp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-fedramp",
        "name": "FedRAMP",
        "role": "Authorization infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Federal cloud certification program.",
        "why": "Certification and procurement are separate steps.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
            "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Federal cloud certification program.",
        "structuralRole": "Authorization infrastructure",
        "significance": "Certification and procurement are separate steps.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Listed service",
            "text": "The official marketplace lists Palantir Federal Cloud Service and its certification profile.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
                "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official listing FR2434554673: certified since 19 November 2024; current Rev5 Class D High.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-fedramp"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
                "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Federal cloud certification",
            "sourceName": "FedRAMP",
            "targetName": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
            "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-ncia",
      "label": "NATO Communications and Information Agency",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Acquired Maven Smart System NATO for Allied Command Operations.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Alliance procurement"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-ncia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-ncia",
        "name": "NATO Communications and Information Agency",
        "role": "Alliance procurement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Acquired Maven Smart System NATO for Allied Command Operations.",
        "why": "A distinct government-side acquisition broadens the deployment route without proving transfer of command.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
            "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Acquired Maven Smart System NATO for Allied Command Operations.",
        "structuralRole": "Alliance procurement",
        "significance": "A distinct government-side acquisition broadens the deployment route without proving transfer of command.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Acquisition",
            "text": "Finalized 25 March 2025 and announced 14 April. The announced scope includes intelligence fusion, targeting and operational planning; no price is disclosed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
                "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Acquisition finalized 25 March 2025 for Allied Command Operations; announced 14 April.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-nato"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
                "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acquired MSS NATO",
            "sourceName": "NATO Communications and Information Agency",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
            "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-inaugural",
      "label": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Recipient of a documented $1 million personal Karp donation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Inaugural fundraising"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-inaugural",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-inaugural",
        "name": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.",
        "role": "Inaugural fundraising",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Recipient of a documented $1 million personal Karp donation.",
        "why": "The recipient and donation category are distinct from a campaign committee.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient of a documented $1 million personal Karp donation.",
        "structuralRole": "Inaugural fundraising",
        "significance": "The recipient and donation category are distinct from a campaign committee.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "FEC record",
            "text": "The amended Form 13 records receipt on 17 December 2024; transaction F132.147400953, page 150, image 202505029758922685.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Received 17 December 2024; FEC transaction F132.147400953; page 150; image 202505029758922685.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-inaugural"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
                "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alex Karp",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$1m personal inaugural donation",
            "sourceName": "Alex Karp",
            "targetName": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Political money and advocacy",
            "text": "A primary FEC record identifies Alexander Karp's $1m donation to Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc., received December 17 2024. Exact locator: amended Form 13 filed May 2 2025, page 150/327, image 202505029758922685, transaction F132.147400953; the full report starts at image 202505029758922536. This is a personal inaugural donation, not corporate money, a candidate campaign contribution, or proof of an exchanged favor. Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form 13 .",
            "matched": [
              "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc."
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d25005a229a99c79a21aa40b916246731b4d135aebc4993d556205ace7a9a262"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-pac",
      "label": "Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Employee PAC named separately in Palantir's lobbying-contribution disclosure.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Political contribution vehicle"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-pac",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-pac",
        "name": "Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC",
        "role": "Political contribution vehicle",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Employee PAC named separately in Palantir's lobbying-contribution disclosure.",
        "why": "PAC activity is not automatically corporate money or a personal Karp decision.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Employee PAC named separately in Palantir's lobbying-contribution disclosure.",
        "structuralRole": "Political contribution vehicle",
        "significance": "PAC activity is not automatically corporate money or a personal Karp decision.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Selected reporting period",
            "text": "The 2025 year-end LD-203 reports seven September PAC contributions totaling $21,000. It is not a total lobbying-expenditure report.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Palantir's year-end 2025 LD-203 separately names the Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-pac"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named PAC in corporate filing",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-reagan",
      "label": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Recipient of Palantir's disclosed $50,000 corporate contribution.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Corporate contribution recipient"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-reagan",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-reagan",
        "name": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute",
        "role": "Corporate contribution recipient",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Recipient of Palantir's disclosed $50,000 corporate contribution.",
        "why": "The exact recipient avoids confusing Reagan library spending with Trump fundraising.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Recipient of Palantir's disclosed $50,000 corporate contribution.",
        "structuralRole": "Corporate contribution recipient",
        "significance": "The exact recipient avoids confusing Reagan library spending with Trump fundraising.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Dated gift",
            "text": "The LD-203 records a corporate self-contribution on 16 December 2025, categorized as presidential library expenses.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LD-203 lists a self-contribution on 16 December 2025 under presidential-library expenses.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-reagan"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$50,000 corporate contribution",
            "sourceName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "targetName": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-sankar",
      "label": "Shyam Sankar",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Palantir CTO and a Senate defense-acquisition reform witness.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Corporate policy advocacy"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-sankar",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-sankar",
        "name": "Shyam Sankar",
        "role": "Corporate policy advocacy",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Palantir CTO and a Senate defense-acquisition reform witness.",
        "why": "Written testimony identifies a concrete policy intervention without attributing it all personally to Karp.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
            "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Palantir CTO and a Senate defense-acquisition reform witness.",
        "structuralRole": "Corporate policy advocacy",
        "significance": "Written testimony identifies a concrete policy intervention without attributing it all personally to Karp.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Testimony",
            "text": "On 28 January 2025 he criticized procurement incentives and commended Wicker's reform work and the FORGED Act. Testimony does not establish authorship or enactment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
                "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sankar criticized procurement incentives and commended Wicker's reform work and the FORGED Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-sankar-testimony"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
                "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Senate Armed Services Committee",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acquisition-reform testimony",
            "sourceName": "Shyam Sankar",
            "targetName": "Senate Armed Services Committee",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "His Senate written testimony identifies his corporate position.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-sankar-role"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
                "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Chief Technology Officer",
            "sourceName": "Shyam Sankar",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Political money and advocacy",
            "text": "There is direct policy advocacy evidence: Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar's January 28 2025 Senate Armed Services testimony criticizes defense procurement incentives and commends Wicker's acquisition-reform work and FORGED Act. The witness speaks in his corporate capacity; that neither attributes every recommendation personally to Karp nor proves authorship of enacted provisions. Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement .",
            "matched": [
              "Shyam Sankar",
              "Sankar"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fd0d06a8ad02b120dcfb2ec1e1e2d8b7b907cc96d7424d6cda935bea13ef69b5"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
            "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-sasc",
      "label": "Senate Armed Services Committee",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Venue for the 28 January 2025 defense innovation and acquisition-reform hearing.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislative hearing"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-sasc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-sasc",
        "name": "Senate Armed Services Committee",
        "role": "Legislative hearing",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Venue for the 28 January 2025 defense innovation and acquisition-reform hearing.",
        "why": "A documented point where corporate policy proposals reach lawmakers.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
            "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Venue for the 28 January 2025 defense innovation and acquisition-reform hearing.",
        "structuralRole": "Legislative hearing",
        "significance": "A documented point where corporate policy proposals reach lawmakers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Witness evidence",
            "text": "Sankar's written statement identifies his corporate position and proposed reform agenda.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
                "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sankar criticized procurement incentives and commended Wicker's reform work and the FORGED Act.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-sankar-testimony"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
                "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Shyam Sankar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Acquisition-reform testimony",
            "sourceName": "Shyam Sankar",
            "targetName": "Senate Armed Services Committee",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
            "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-trae",
      "label": "Trae Stephens",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Founders Fund partner, Anduril executive chairman and former Palantir employee.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Personnel bridge across defense technology and investment"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-trae",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-trae",
        "name": "Trae Stephens",
        "role": "Personnel bridge across defense technology and investment",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Founders Fund partner, Anduril executive chairman and former Palantir employee.",
        "why": "This documented career connection is stronger than inferring command from common investors.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
            "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Founders Fund partner, Anduril executive chairman and former Palantir employee.",
        "structuralRole": "Personnel bridge across defense technology and investment",
        "significance": "This documented career connection is stronger than inferring command from common investors.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Current and historical roles",
            "text": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies these roles and describes his prior Palantir defense/intelligence growth work. It does not establish Karp's command over Anduril.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
                "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Biography describes former Palantir intelligence/defense growth and product work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-trae-palantir"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
                "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Historical employee",
            "sourceName": "Trae Stephens",
            "targetName": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Stephens as its partner.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-trae-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
                "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Founders Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Partner",
            "sourceName": "Trae Stephens",
            "targetName": "Founders Fund",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The maintained biography identifies Stephens's Anduril role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-trae-anduril"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
                "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anduril Industries",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder and executive chairman",
            "sourceName": "Trae Stephens",
            "targetName": "Anduril Industries",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "Thiel, Anduril and a16z",
            "text": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Trae Stephens as its partner, Anduril co-founder/executive chairman, and an early Palantir employee who led intelligence/defense and international-growth work. That is an independently documented personnel route connecting the firms. It is not proof that Karp directs Anduril or that Founders Fund controls Palantir. Founders Fund: Trae Stephens . The existing Thiel Foundation node must not be merged with Peter Thiel or Founders Fund merely because their names connect.",
            "matched": [
              "Trae Stephens",
              "Stephens"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "02be6598f69723804d2c0f13ca2707097a707535ca86fae25d5d1ba537715d21"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
            "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-court",
      "label": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The court's 27 August 2026 order vacating challenged measures and preserving lawful procurement discretion.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Judicial constraint on government action"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-karp-court",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-court",
        "name": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
        "role": "Judicial constraint on government action",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The court's 27 August 2026 order vacating challenged measures and preserving lawful procurement discretion.",
        "why": "It prevents a stale March blacklist headline from substituting for the current legal record.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
            "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "alex-karp-contracts-and-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The court's 27 August 2026 order vacating challenged measures and preserving lawful procurement discretion.",
        "structuralRole": "Judicial constraint on government action",
        "significance": "It prevents a stale March blacklist headline from substituting for the current legal record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Final relief",
            "text": "Docket 251 in 26-cv-01996-RFL vacates the section 3252 designation and broad contractor boycott and permanently enjoins specified actions. Paragraph 14 permits lawful provider changes.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Contract limit is not a technical veto",
            "text": "The accompanying opinion describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual: Anthropic could not see DoW prompts or intervene technically in the deployed model. The department controlled future deployment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
                "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Separate review remains",
            "text": "D.C. Circuit cases 26-1049/26-1162 still show briefing activity in the public mirror through 3 September. This is not a live 12 September docket certification.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "D.C. Circuit docket26-1049, consolidated26-1162",
                "url": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations",
                "url": "https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Paragraph 14 expressly allows lawful transition to another AI provider and does not require continued Anthropic use.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-court-choice"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lawful supplier choice preserved",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "targetName": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Docket 251 of 27 August 2026 vacates challenged measures and permanently enjoins specified implementation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-karp-e-court-relief"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
                "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Designation and boycott vacated",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
            "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
            "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250"
          },
          {
            "title": "D.C. Circuit docket26-1049, consolidated26-1162",
            "url": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations",
            "url": "https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-public-first-uk",
      "label": "Public First (UK consultancy)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A UK research and policy consultancy commissioned by CLTR to poll public views about AI.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Commissioned opinion research"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-policy-public-first-uk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-public-first-uk",
        "name": "Public First (UK consultancy)",
        "role": "Commissioned opinion research",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A UK research and policy consultancy commissioned by CLTR to poll public views about AI.",
        "why": "The commissioned poll supplies evidence used in advocacy. It is a separate identity from US Public First Action, which receives disclosed Anthropic support.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A UK research and policy consultancy commissioned by CLTR to poll public views about AI.",
        "structuralRole": "Commissioned opinion research",
        "significance": "The commissioned poll supplies evidence used in advocacy. It is a separate identity from US Public First Action, which receives disclosed Anthropic support.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The work documented here",
            "text": "CLTR’s 2024 annual report identifies Public First as the pollster for 2,011 UK adults surveyed from 28 October to 5 November 2024. The report supports a commissioned research relationship; it does not disclose the fee or give CLTR control over the pollster’s other clients.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "CLTR identifies Public First UK as its pollster for 2,011 UK adults surveyed 28 October–5 November 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
                "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Commissioned 2024 AI opinion poll",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "targetName": "Public First (UK consultancy)",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
            "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions",
            "title": "Funding policy work and organizing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-cltr-architecture",
      "label": "CLTR proposed AI governance architecture",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A set of April 2026 recommendations for government AI coordination, oversight and public deliberation.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "A proposed distribution of public authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-policy-cltr-architecture",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-cltr-architecture",
        "name": "CLTR proposed AI governance architecture",
        "role": "A proposed distribution of public authority",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A set of April 2026 recommendations for government AI coordination, oversight and public deliberation.",
        "why": "It shows which institutions the advocate wants to create or strengthen and which decisions would become their responsibility.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A set of April 2026 recommendations for government AI coordination, oversight and public deliberation.",
        "structuralRole": "A proposed distribution of public authority",
        "significance": "It shows which institutions the advocate wants to create or strengthen and which decisions would become their responsibility.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the submission asks for",
            "text": "CLTR proposes a Cabinet Office AI Security Coordination Unit, an independent Office for AI Responsibility, departmental adoption leads, parliamentary scrutiny and a permanent Citizens’ AI Council. The council would deliberate; the submission does not give it a veto. These are proposals, not a roster of operating institutions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Proposed government AI institutions",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "targetName": "CLTR proposed AI governance architecture",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions",
            "title": "Funding policy work and organizing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-stipends",
      "label": "PauseAI volunteer stipend programme",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A recurring support programme that requires a signed agreement, regular meetings and continued contributions aligned with PauseAI Global priorities.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Continuing support with organizational conditions"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w37-policy-stipends",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-stipends",
        "name": "PauseAI volunteer stipend programme",
        "role": "Continuing support with organizational conditions",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A recurring support programme that requires a signed agreement, regular meetings and continued contributions aligned with PauseAI Global priorities.",
        "why": "Renewal and eligibility rules are one concrete way an organization can guide activity without controlling every public statement.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A recurring support programme that requires a signed agreement, regular meetings and continued contributions aligned with PauseAI Global priorities.",
        "structuralRole": "Continuing support with organizational conditions",
        "significance": "Renewal and eligibility rules are one concrete way an organization can guide activity without controlling every public statement.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The published conditions",
            "text": "The programme describes typical six-month arrangements, country-specific limits and meetings with organizing or chapter leadership. Continued support depends on contributions and alignment with Global priorities, with termination for agreement violations. No named volunteer’s agreement, payment history or termination was inspected.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Published rules require signed agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w37-policy-e-stipend-operation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
                "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Sets eligibility and renewal conditions",
            "sourceName": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "targetName": "PauseAI volunteer stipend programme",
            "date": "Checked 12 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
            "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions",
            "title": "Funding policy work and organizing"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-us-congress",
      "label": "US Congress — reported lobbying audience",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "The Senate and House are named as the chambers lobbied in Control AI US first-half 2026 disclosures. Individual offices and meetings are not specified.",
      "roles": [
        "Federal legislative audience"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-us-congress",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-us-congress",
        "name": "US Congress — reported lobbying audience",
        "role": "Federal legislative audience",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The Senate and House are named as the chambers lobbied in Control AI US first-half 2026 disclosures. Individual offices and meetings are not specified.",
        "why": "The Senate and House are named as the chambers lobbied in Control AI US first-half 2026 disclosures. Individual offices and meetings are not specified.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Senate and House are named as the chambers lobbied in Control AI US first-half 2026 disclosures. Individual offices and meetings are not specified.",
        "structuralRole": "Federal legislative audience",
        "significance": "The Senate and House are named as the chambers lobbied in Control AI US first-half 2026 disclosures. Individual offices and meetings are not specified.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The Senate and House are named as the chambers lobbied in Control AI US first-half 2026 disclosures. Individual offices and meetings are not specified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Both quarterly reports name the Senate and House as lobbying audiences; neither identifies the officials contacted or attributes legislative wording.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-congress-lobbying"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports lobbying on ASI and loss-of-control risks",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "US Congress — reported lobbying audience",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-max-hz",
      "label": "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Named Control AI US lobbyist in both first-half 2026 quarterly reports. The initial registration discloses prior work as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins.",
      "roles": [
        "Lobbyist with disclosed congressional staff experience"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-max-hz",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-max-hz",
        "name": "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
        "role": "Lobbyist with disclosed congressional staff experience",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Named Control AI US lobbyist in both first-half 2026 quarterly reports. The initial registration discloses prior work as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins.",
        "why": "Named Control AI US lobbyist in both first-half 2026 quarterly reports. The initial registration discloses prior work as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Named Control AI US lobbyist in both first-half 2026 quarterly reports. The initial registration discloses prior work as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins.",
        "structuralRole": "Lobbyist with disclosed congressional staff experience",
        "significance": "Named Control AI US lobbyist in both first-half 2026 quarterly reports. The initial registration discloses prior work as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Named Control AI US lobbyist in both first-half 2026 quarterly reports. The initial registration discloses prior work as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The initial registration discloses prior congressional staff employment; both quarterly reports identify Hernandez-Zapata as a lobbyist.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-max-lobbyist"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
            "sourceName": "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "heading": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "text": "The initial registration became effective July 1, 2025 and names Max Hernandez-Zapata, disclosing his earlier job as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins. Connor Leahy appears alongside him in both 2026 quarterly reports. Nathan Morrison’s March19 registration identifies a consulting relationship with Control AI US; the second-quarter report also names him.",
            "matched": [
              "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
              "Hernandez-Zapata"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "bdaf7ffd8d3608b9c782889c0e313fb89caeebb1a938003fd7699e1a496051d1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
            "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
            "heading": "Strongest interpretation, rivals and gaps",
            "text": "Secondary lead not promoted to verified amount: OpenLobby reports $60k US lobbying spend across three 2025 quarterly filings and identifies Max Hernandez-Zapata, but underlying LD-2 returns were not read. https://www.openlobby.us/clients/control-ai-us-inc",
            "matched": [
              "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
              "Hernandez-Zapata"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0b40572c50484deaa7133019a533e97c1540e8c4e70072676cfa627a230ac392"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-nathan-morrison",
      "label": "Nathan Morrison",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Registered in March 2026 as a self-employed consultant for Control AI US and named in its second-quarter lobbying report.",
      "roles": [
        "Registered advocacy consultant"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-nathan-morrison",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-nathan-morrison",
        "name": "Nathan Morrison",
        "role": "Registered advocacy consultant",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Registered in March 2026 as a self-employed consultant for Control AI US and named in its second-quarter lobbying report.",
        "why": "Registered in March 2026 as a self-employed consultant for Control AI US and named in its second-quarter lobbying report.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Registered in March 2026 as a self-employed consultant for Control AI US and named in its second-quarter lobbying report.",
        "structuralRole": "Registered advocacy consultant",
        "significance": "Registered in March 2026 as a self-employed consultant for Control AI US and named in its second-quarter lobbying report.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Registered in March 2026 as a self-employed consultant for Control AI US and named in its second-quarter lobbying report.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Morrison registered Control AI US as his client on March19 and is listed among its Q2 lobbyists.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-morrison-client"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Registers consulting relationship",
            "sourceName": "Nathan Morrison",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-03-19; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "heading": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
            "text": "Foreign-entity disclosures identify Secure Future Research Ltd. The registration reports a USD25,000 contribution entry and 0% ownership; Morrison’s separate form has a USD5,000 entry. The form allows several grounds for foreign-entity disclosure. Those entries do not identify an exact transfer date, establish UK-government sponsorship, or settle the terms of UK-US direction.",
            "matched": [
              "Morrison"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a12a4ef26e39b8de32c7101f87a0bd9c0b750fc726b3d3b1b88ffb350a9405a6"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-controlai-q1",
      "label": "Control AI US Q1 2026 lobbying expenses",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "USD120,000 in reported lobbying expenses for January-March 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed April17.",
      "roles": [
        "Quarterly expense disclosure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-controlai-q1",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-controlai-q1",
        "name": "Control AI US Q1 2026 lobbying expenses",
        "role": "Quarterly expense disclosure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "USD120,000 in reported lobbying expenses for January-March 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed April17.",
        "why": "USD120,000 in reported lobbying expenses for January-March 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed April17.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "USD120,000 in reported lobbying expenses for January-March 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed April17.",
        "structuralRole": "Quarterly expense disclosure",
        "significance": "USD120,000 in reported lobbying expenses for January-March 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed April17.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "USD120,000 in reported lobbying expenses for January-March 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed April17.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Control AI US reports USD120,000 for Q1 2026 under Method A. The figure is a rounded expense estimate, not a donation to a politician.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-q1-expenses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports USD120,000 lobbying expenses",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Q1 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "date": "2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-controlai-q2",
      "label": "Control AI US Q2 2026 lobbying expenses",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "USD80,000 in reported lobbying expenses for April-June 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed July17.",
      "roles": [
        "Quarterly expense disclosure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-controlai-q2",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-controlai-q2",
        "name": "Control AI US Q2 2026 lobbying expenses",
        "role": "Quarterly expense disclosure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "USD80,000 in reported lobbying expenses for April-June 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed July17.",
        "why": "USD80,000 in reported lobbying expenses for April-June 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed July17.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "USD80,000 in reported lobbying expenses for April-June 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed July17.",
        "structuralRole": "Quarterly expense disclosure",
        "significance": "USD80,000 in reported lobbying expenses for April-June 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed July17.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "USD80,000 in reported lobbying expenses for April-June 2026, a rounded Method A estimate filed July17.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "controlai-us-lobbying-records"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Control AI US reports USD80,000 for Q2 2026 under Method A. Keep the period separate from the July17 filing date.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-q2-expenses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
                "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Control AI US Inc",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports USD80,000 lobbying expenses",
            "sourceName": "Control AI US Inc",
            "targetName": "Control AI US Q2 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "date": "2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
            "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
            "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "label": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Signed September9,2026 as Chapter179. GovOps must develop independent-verifier designation criteria by January1,2028; the law does not make an audit a general condition of operating AI.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Legislation"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-sb813",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "name": "California SB813 — enrolled, enactment unestablished",
        "role": "Legislation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Passed30August/enrolled1September2026; no signature/chapter shown9September. Would establish GovOps IVO qualification but preserves operation without this route. Earlier certification liability benefits absent.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Passed30August/enrolled1September2026; no signature/chapter shown9September. Would establish GovOps IVO qualification but preserves operation without this route. Earlier certification liability benefits absent."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
            "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 5
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Signed September9,2026 as Chapter179. GovOps must develop independent-verifier designation criteria by January1,2028; the law does not make an audit a general condition of operating AI.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [
          "Passed30August/enrolled1September2026; no signature/chapter shown9September. Would establish GovOps IVO qualification but preserves operation without this route. Earlier certification liability benefits absent."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What survived enrollment",
            "text": "The enrolled bill would direct Government Operations to establish independent verification organization requirements and suspension procedures by 1 January 2028 if enacted. Earlier affirmative-defense and rebuttable-presumption benefits do not survive. Section 8898.4 rejects verification as a condition of developing, deploying or operating AI in California. The Business Software Alliance nevertheless warned that voluntary audits could become litigation expectations; that is a predicted effect, not evidence of actual compulsion.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 official status",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
                "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-sponsor",
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-version-change",
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops",
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary",
              "w9-assure-e-bsa-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Final audit may be relevant but not conclusive; neither affirmative defense nor rebuttable presumption survives. No causal attribution for each deletion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-version-change"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "earlier certification framework superseded in enrolled text",
            "sourceName": "SB813 earlier MRO role —2025",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-01 – 2026-09-01"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Official author/committee identify sponsorship. Does not establish exclusive drafting/approval. Meridian arm is attributed, legal identity unresolved.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-sponsor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
                "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
                "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "sponsors legislative proposal",
            "sourceName": "Fathom (AI-governance nonprofit)",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "First announcement26March2025; subsequent sponsor status in packet"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section8898.4 does not require engagement of an IVO or a covered audit as a condition of developing, deploying or operating an AI system.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Preserves ability to operate without this audit route",
            "sourceName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "targetName": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SB813 assigns GovOps the development of qualification, suspension and termination criteria. Rules are due on or before January1,2028.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Enacts verifier-designation duties",
            "sourceName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "targetName": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "OpenAI endorsed SB813 as a route to qualified independent assessment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-openai-sb"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly endorses auditor legislation",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Floor pp6-7 report predicted indirect pressure alongside competence/alignment concerns; not evidence of actual refusal or legal compulsion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-bsa-pressure"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Business Software Alliance",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "objects that voluntary audits could become litigation expectations",
            "sourceName": "Business Software Alliance",
            "targetName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "date": "2026-08-30 – 2026-08-30"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
            "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/"
          },
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Signed September 9, 2026 as Chapter 179. GovOps must develop independent-verifier designation criteria by January 1, 2028; the law does not make an audit a general condition of operating AI.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "SB813 creates California's framework for designating independent verification organizations to assess AI systems. It was signed on September 9, 2026 as Chapter 179. The general effective date is January 1, 2027, and GovOps must develop designation criteria by January 1, 2028. This changes the record from an enrolled proposal into an enacted law with implementation still ahead.",
            "The framework makes expertise, independence and financial conflicts part of qualification. An assessed company can pay market rates, but an assessor's fee cannot depend on its finding. Working groups must include engineers from competing AI companies and AI-safety experts. These requirements identify the people and financial relationships that deserve scrutiny as the rules are written.",
            "SB813 expressly preserves the ability to operate without buying this verification service. Its companion, AB1405, governs entry into the covered audit-provider market from January 2029. Together they make the assessment industry more formally governed. The next revealing records are GovOps membership, criteria and actual designation decisions."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
      "label": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "A statutory designation under the enacted law. Qualification rules are due by January2028; no appointed verifier is established by this update.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Proposed role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-ivo-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
        "name": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
        "role": "Proposed role",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "No appointed operator. Proposed independence, reporting and non-outcome-contingent payment rules apply to the role.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "No appointed operator. Proposed independence, reporting and non-outcome-contingent payment rules apply to the role."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A statutory designation under the enacted law. Qualification rules are due by January2028; no appointed verifier is established by this update.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [
          "No appointed operator. Proposed independence, reporting and non-outcome-contingent payment rules apply to the role."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SB813 assigns GovOps qualification, suspension and termination procedures for independent verification organizations, due by January1,2028. This is an enacted assignment; no specific designation is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Must develop verifier qualification and removal procedures",
            "sourceName": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "targetName": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "date": "Enacted 9 September2026; general effect January2027; rules due January2028."
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The enacted criteria allow the assessed party to pay an IVO at reasonable market rates while requiring independence and forbidding fees contingent on the assessment result.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "May pay market rates; outcome-contingent fees barred",
            "sourceName": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "targetName": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "A statutory designation under the enacted law. Qualification rules are due by January 2028; no appointed verifier is established by this update.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "An independent verification organization, or IVO, is the assessor designation established by California's enacted SB813 framework. This entry represents that legal role. GovOps must develop qualification criteria by January 2028, after the law's general effective date of January 1, 2027. The designation process and the actual organizations receiving it remain the next implementation steps to examine.",
            "Qualification involves technical expertise, independence and financial conflicts. An AI company may pay an assessor market rates for its work, but payment cannot depend on the outcome of the assessment. Designated organizations also have reporting obligations concerning methodology and relevant governance or funding changes. These provisions make both competence and the assessor's financial relationship with its client visible subjects for oversight.",
            "The role matters because outside assessment can influence whether a system is regarded as adequately evaluated. SB813 nevertheless preserves operation without purchasing this service. Actual contracts, access rights, methodologies and designation decisions will show how much practical influence individual IVOs acquire."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-ab1405",
      "label": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Signed September9,2026 as Chapter178. From January1,2029, providers offering, selling or conducting covered AI audits must register with GovOps.",
      "roles": [
        "Enacted market-entry rules for AI auditors"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-ab1405",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-ab1405",
        "name": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
        "role": "Enacted market-entry rules for AI auditors",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Signed September9,2026 as Chapter178. From January1,2029, providers offering, selling or conducting covered AI audits must register with GovOps.",
        "why": "Signed September9,2026 as Chapter178. From January1,2029, providers offering, selling or conducting covered AI audits must register with GovOps.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Signed September9,2026 as Chapter178. From January1,2029, providers offering, selling or conducting covered AI audits must register with GovOps.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Specified qualified accountancy work can satisfy parts of AB1405 through professional standards. GovOps must refer covered accountant misconduct findings to the Board for investigation and a report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-accountancy-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Board of Accountancy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Uses existing accountancy oversight",
            "sourceName": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "targetName": "California Board of Accountancy",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AB1405 requires GovOps to create an online AI-auditor registry and set annual fees no higher than reasonable administration costs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-ab-registry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Requires registry by January2029",
            "sourceName": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "targetName": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "date": "Event or period: 2029-01-01; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "OpenAI endorsed AB1405 registration, independence and accountability requirements.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-openai-ab"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly endorses auditor registration",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/"
          },
          {
            "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "california-ai-auditors-enacted",
            "title": "California’s AI auditor laws are enacted"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Signed September 9, 2026 as Chapter 178. From January 1, 2029, providers offering, selling or conducting covered AI audits must register with GovOps.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "AB1405 establishes California's registration framework for AI auditors. Signed on September 9, 2026 as Chapter 178, it generally takes effect on January 1, 2027. Its important market-entry requirement begins January 1, 2029: providers offering, selling or conducting covered AI audits must register with GovOps. That future requirement should remain visible when reading the law alongside current audit businesses.",
            "GovOps must establish the registry, collect annual fees tied to reasonable administration costs and provide a public route for reporting misconduct. The law allows removal and referrals, and connects specified professional-accountancy work to existing standards and the California Board of Accountancy. This brings a familiar professional-regulation mechanism into the AI assessment market.",
            "The bill matters because it specifies who may supply a covered service and how complaints about that supplier can move through institutions. Its companion SB813 addresses designation of independent verifiers. Implementation will determine the practical registration process, professional-equivalence criteria and treatment of complaints."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
      "label": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "GovOps must establish the registry by January1,2029, with registration fees and a misconduct-reporting channel.",
      "roles": [
        "Future registration and complaint infrastructure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-ai-auditor-registry",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
        "name": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
        "role": "Future registration and complaint infrastructure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "GovOps must establish the registry by January1,2029, with registration fees and a misconduct-reporting channel.",
        "why": "GovOps must establish the registry by January1,2029, with registration fees and a misconduct-reporting channel.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "GovOps must establish the registry by January1,2029, with registration fees and a misconduct-reporting channel.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GovOps receives registration information, can investigate violations, remove auditors from the registry and refer matters for enforcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-govops-registry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Administers registration and misconduct channel",
            "sourceName": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "targetName": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AB1405 requires GovOps to create an online AI-auditor registry and set annual fees no higher than reasonable administration costs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-ab-registry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Requires registry by January2029",
            "sourceName": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "targetName": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "date": "Event or period: 2029-01-01; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          },
          {
            "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "california-ai-auditors-enacted",
            "title": "California’s AI auditor laws are enacted"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "GovOps must establish the registry by January 1, 2029, with registration fees and a misconduct-reporting channel.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The AI-auditor registry is the administrative system that California's AB1405 requires GovOps to establish by January 1, 2029. The underlying law was signed in September 2026. From the 2029 date, providers must register before offering, selling or conducting the audits covered by the statute. This entry represents the required future system and its functions.",
            "Registration connects eligibility to a continuing administrative relationship. Annual fees support reasonable administration costs, and a public channel receives allegations of misconduct. GovOps can remove auditors and refer violations, while specified accountancy misconduct can reach the existing professional regulator. Those procedures make registration more consequential than simply placing a company's name in a public directory.",
            "The registry will become a useful place to trace who supplies assessment services and which institutions supervise them. Implementation records should reveal application requirements, fees and complaint procedures. Its relationship to SB813's verifier designation framework also deserves attention: permission to supply a covered audit and recognition in a particular assessment role are separate functions."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-ca-accountancy",
      "label": "California Board of Accountancy",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "AB1405 gives this existing professional regulator a role in investigating referred misconduct by accountants performing AI audits.",
      "roles": [
        "Professional oversight and complaint investigations"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-ca-accountancy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-ca-accountancy",
        "name": "California Board of Accountancy",
        "role": "Professional oversight and complaint investigations",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "AB1405 gives this existing professional regulator a role in investigating referred misconduct by accountants performing AI audits.",
        "why": "AB1405 gives this existing professional regulator a role in investigating referred misconduct by accountants performing AI audits.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AB1405 gives this existing professional regulator a role in investigating referred misconduct by accountants performing AI audits.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Specified qualified accountancy work can satisfy parts of AB1405 through professional standards. GovOps must refer covered accountant misconduct findings to the Board for investigation and a report.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-accountancy-route"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Uses existing accountancy oversight",
            "sourceName": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "targetName": "California Board of Accountancy",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          },
          {
            "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "california-ai-auditors-enacted",
            "title": "California’s AI auditor laws are enacted"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "AB1405 gives this existing professional regulator a role in investigating referred misconduct by accountants performing AI audits.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The California Board of Accountancy is an existing professional regulator drawn into the AI-audit framework through AB1405. The September 2026 law uses specified professional-accountancy standards and provides a route for investigating referred misconduct by accountants performing AI audits. This is a concrete link between an established profession and an emerging category of technical assessment.",
            "AB1405 places the wider auditor registry with GovOps and requires registration for covered providers from January 2029. It also creates a public complaint channel and authorizes removal and referrals. The accountancy board's role belongs within that division of responsibility: an allegation involving professional accounting work can reach the institution already responsible for that profession.",
            "The connection matters because new AI oversight need not be built entirely through new organizations. Existing qualifications, standards and enforcement processes can become part of its infrastructure. The useful follow-up is to examine the professional-equivalence criteria, referrals and guidance that explain how accounting expertise will be applied to particular AI audit assignments."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-embedded-review",
      "label": "Anthropic embedded external-review commitment",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Amodei announced continuing outside evaluator access at Anthropic, followed by proposed industry and government coordination.",
      "roles": [
        "Announced evaluator-access arrangement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w38-embedded-review",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-embedded-review",
        "name": "Anthropic embedded external-review commitment",
        "role": "Announced evaluator-access arrangement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Amodei announced continuing outside evaluator access at Anthropic, followed by proposed industry and government coordination.",
        "why": "Amodei announced continuing outside evaluator access at Anthropic, followed by proposed industry and government coordination.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
            "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "frontier-pacing-and-evaluator-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Amodei announced continuing outside evaluator access at Anthropic, followed by proposed industry and government coordination.",
        "structuralRole": "Announced evaluator-access arrangement",
        "significance": "Amodei announced continuing outside evaluator access at Anthropic, followed by proposed industry and government coordination.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Amodei announced continuing outside evaluator access at Anthropic, followed by proposed industry and government coordination.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
                "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "frontier-pacing-and-evaluator-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Amodei commits Anthropic to employee-like reviewer access and publication rights subject to specified redactions. No installed team or executed contract was established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-anthropic-review"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
                "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commits to ongoing outside evaluator access",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Anthropic embedded external-review commitment",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
            "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "frontier-pacing-and-evaluator-access",
            "title": "Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-govops",
      "label": "California Government Operations Agency",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "California’s Government Operations Agency receives duties under the enacted SB813 and AB1405 laws: independent-verifier criteria due by January2028, and an auditor registry by January2029.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "identity"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Public authority"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-govops",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-govops",
        "name": "California Government Operations Agency",
        "role": "Public authority",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Enrolled SB813 would delegate verifier qualification and suspension procedures if enacted; no exercised designation acquired.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Enrolled SB813 would delegate verifier qualification and suspension procedures if enacted; no exercised designation acquired."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "state",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "California’s Government Operations Agency receives duties under the enacted SB813 and AB1405 laws: independent-verifier criteria due by January2028, and an auditor registry by January2029.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [
          "Enrolled SB813 would delegate verifier qualification and suspension procedures if enacted; no exercised designation acquired."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Proposed responsibilities",
            "text": "Sections 8898.1–3 would address expertise, conflicts, methods, reporting and operational independence, with qualification requirements due by 1 January 2028 if enacted. The bill provides for consultation and working groups. The retained text identifies no named private appointee or private veto, and the record shows no exercised designation. A bespoke appeal mechanism was not identified in this scope.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SB813 official status",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops",
              "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SB813 assigns GovOps qualification, suspension and termination procedures for independent verification organizations, due by January1,2028. This is an enacted assignment; no specific designation is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Must develop verifier qualification and removal procedures",
            "sourceName": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "targetName": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "date": "Enacted 9 September2026; general effect January2027; rules due January2028."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "GovOps receives registration information, can investigate violations, remove auditors from the registry and refer matters for enforcement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w38-e-govops-registry"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Administers registration and misconduct channel",
            "sourceName": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "targetName": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "SB813 assigns GovOps the development of qualification, suspension and termination criteria. Rules are due on or before January1,2028.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Enacts verifier-designation duties",
            "sourceName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "targetName": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "California’s Government Operations Agency receives duties under the enacted SB813 and AB1405 laws: independent-verifier criteria due by January 2028, and an auditor registry by January 2029.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "California's Government Operations Agency becomes an important implementation body under two laws signed on September 9, 2026. SB813 assigns it the development of criteria for independent verification organizations by January 2028. AB1405 requires an AI-auditor registry by January 2029. Those are future implementation duties attached to enacted legislation.",
            "The agency will help decide what qualifies an assessor to perform these roles. SB813 requires attention to expertise, independence and conflicts, with working groups that include engineers from competing AI companies and AI-safety experts. AB1405 adds registration administration, a misconduct-reporting channel and powers concerning removal and referrals. The criteria and the people contributing to them are consequential parts of the design.",
            "GovOps therefore sits between legislation and the emerging assessment market. It can translate broad ideas about trustworthy evaluation into eligibility rules and procedures. Following its appointments, draft criteria, fees and complaint handling will reveal more than treating passage of the bills as the end of the policy process."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
      "label": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
      "type": "other",
      "summary": "The class of AI developers, deployers and operators whose systems can be assessed. Enacted SB813 preserves operation without engaging an IVO; it permits market-rate assessment fees independent of the result.",
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "roles": [
        "Decision-making role"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w9-assure-assessed-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
        "name": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
        "role": "Decision-making role",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Generic role, not a named company. Verification optional under this proposed framework; other laws/contracts remain separate.",
        "why": "",
        "about": [
          "Generic role, not a named company. Verification optional under this proposed framework; other laws/contracts remain separate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "curated": false,
        "group": "industry",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ],
        "core": false,
        "relationshipCount": 2
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The class of AI developers, deployers and operators whose systems can be assessed. Enacted SB813 preserves operation without engaging an IVO; it permits market-rate assessment fees independent of the result.",
        "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
        "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "background": [
          "Generic role, not a named company. Verification optional under this proposed framework; other laws/contracts remain separate."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              },
              {
                "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "california-ai-auditors-enacted"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The enacted criteria allow the assessed party to pay an IVO at reasonable market rates while requiring independence and forbidding fees contingent on the assessment result.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "May pay market rates; outcome-contingent fees barred",
            "sourceName": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "targetName": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Section8898.4 does not require engagement of an IVO or a covered audit as a condition of developing, deploying or operating an AI system.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
                "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Preserves ability to operate without this audit route",
            "sourceName": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "targetName": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
            "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The class of AI developers, deployers and operators whose systems can be assessed. Enacted SB813 preserves operation without engaging an IVO; it permits market-rate assessment fees independent of the result.",
          "structuralRole": "AI assessment rules and implementation",
          "significance": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January 2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January 2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "This entry represents the AI developers, deployers and operators whose systems can be assessed under California's SB813 framework. It is a class of potential assessment clients. The law was signed in September 2026, generally takes effect in January 2027, and gives GovOps a January 2028 deadline for developing the independent-verifier designation criteria.",
            "The financial arrangement is explicit: an assessed company may pay a verifier market rates, while the verifier's fee cannot depend on the assessment result. That creates a paid professional relationship whose independence must be maintained. The legislation also expressly preserves the ability to operate without engaging an IVO, an important limit when describing what the assessment framework requires.",
            "The structural question is how client needs, assessor standards and regulatory recognition will interact in practice. AB1405 separately regulates entry into the covered audit-provider market from January 2029. Future contracts and designation rules will show what access companies give evaluators and what buyers receive for their assessment fees."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
            },
            {
              "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
              "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-pliny",
      "label": "Pliny the Liberator",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Public AI jailbreak researcher, open-tool publisher and BT6 leader; a16z named him as an Open Source AI Grant recipient in June2025.",
      "roles": [
        "Researcher linking public experimentation, funding and lab testing"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Pliny the Prompter",
        "elder_plinius",
        "elder-plinius"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability",
        "capital"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-pliny",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-pliny",
        "name": "Pliny the Liberator",
        "role": "Researcher linking public experimentation, funding and lab testing",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Public AI jailbreak researcher, open-tool publisher and BT6 leader; a16z named him as an Open Source AI Grant recipient in June2025.",
        "why": "Public AI jailbreak researcher, open-tool publisher and BT6 leader; a16z named him as an Open Source AI Grant recipient in June2025.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Pliny the Prompter",
          "elder_plinius",
          "elder-plinius"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
            "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public AI jailbreak researcher, open-tool publisher and BT6 leader; a16z named him as an Open Source AI Grant recipient in June2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Researcher linking public experimentation, funding and lab testing",
        "significance": "Structurally, he is a bridge between independent experimentation and institutional support. That makes publication freedom an important question: who can finance the work, what access comes with a lab engagement, and what results can remain public? His stated openness commitments make those terms worth following. They are more revealing than treating either publicity or a grant as a complete explanation of his motives.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Pliny is a public AI jailbreak researcher and tool publisher. His importance here is the combination of a large public-facing research practice and access to institutions that have money, distribution and evaluation work. His project hub connects readers to Libertas, Claritas, BT6 and the BASI community. Those are the practical routes through which his work can reach other researchers.\n\nThe money connection is concrete: a16z named him in its June2025 Open Source AI Grant cohort. TIME also reported an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. The available records leave the grant’s size and precise instrument unresolved; the two grant descriptions may refer to the same award. The map keeps that question visible instead of inventing a second payment.\n\nStructurally, he is a bridge between independent experimentation and institutional support. That makes publication freedom an important question: who can finance the work, what access comes with a lab engagement, and what results can remain public? His stated openness commitments make those terms worth following. They are more revealing than treating either publicity or a grant as a complete explanation of his motives.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
                "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The June26,2025 cohort announcement names Pliny. The program describes grants rather than investments; recipient-specific value is undisclosed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
                "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces Open Source AI Grant",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-06-26; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SANS announced Pliny as a keynote for its April20-21,2026 AI security summit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-sans-speaker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
                "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SANS Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces keynote speaker",
            "sourceName": "SANS Institute",
            "targetName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-02-25; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Latent Space interview introduces Pliny and John V as leaders of BT6.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-pliny-bt6"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Pliny’s public project hub directs readers to the BASI community.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-pliny-community"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BASI community",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Links public community",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "BASI community",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-13; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The February6,2025 article names Pliny the Liberator as coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-pliny-venom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthors research report",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub links CL4R1T4S / Claritas.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-claritas-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CL4R1T4S / Claritas",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lists public research project",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "CL4R1T4S / Claritas",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub links L1B3RT4S / Libertas.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-libertas-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "L1B3RT4S / Libertas",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lists public research project",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "L1B3RT4S / Libertas",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "TIME reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. This may describe the a16z cohort award already mapped; it is not counted as a second transfer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-reported-personal-grant"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
                "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marc Andreessen",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported unrestricted grant",
            "sourceName": "Marc Andreessen",
            "targetName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
            "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
            "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          },
          {
            "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
            "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Public AI jailbreak researcher, open-tool publisher and BT6 leader; a16z named him as an Open Source AI Grant recipient in June2025.",
          "structuralRole": "Researcher linking public experimentation, funding and lab testing",
          "significance": "Structurally, he is a bridge between independent experimentation and institutional support. That makes publication freedom an important question: who can finance the work, what access comes with a lab engagement, and what results can remain public? His stated openness commitments make those terms worth following. They are more revealing than treating either publicity or a grant as a complete explanation of his motives.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Pliny is a public AI jailbreak researcher and tool publisher. His importance here is the combination of a large public-facing research practice and access to institutions that have money, distribution and evaluation work. His project hub connects readers to Libertas, Claritas, BT6 and the BASI community. Those are the practical routes through which his work can reach other researchers.",
            "The money connection is concrete: a16z named him in its June2025 Open Source AI Grant cohort. TIME also reported an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. The available records leave the grant’s size and precise instrument unresolved; the two grant descriptions may refer to the same award. The map keeps that question visible instead of inventing a second payment.",
            "Structurally, he is a bridge between independent experimentation and institutional support. That makes publication freedom an important question: who can finance the work, what access comes with a lab engagement, and what results can remain public? His stated openness commitments make those terms worth following. They are more revealing than treating either publicity or a grant as a complete explanation of his motives."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
              "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/"
            },
            {
              "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
              "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
              "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
              "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-basi",
      "label": "BASI community",
      "type": "group",
      "summary": "The public community linked from Pliny’s project hub, connecting AI red teamers and prompt engineers around open experimentation.",
      "roles": [
        "Community and knowledge exchange"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "BASI",
        "Basilisk community"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-basi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-basi",
        "name": "BASI community",
        "role": "Community and knowledge exchange",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "The public community linked from Pliny’s project hub, connecting AI red teamers and prompt engineers around open experimentation.",
        "why": "The public community linked from Pliny’s project hub, connecting AI red teamers and prompt engineers around open experimentation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "BASI",
          "Basilisk community"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The public community linked from Pliny’s project hub, connecting AI red teamers and prompt engineers around open experimentation.",
        "structuralRole": "Community and knowledge exchange",
        "significance": "The structural question is how openly exchanged knowledge becomes organized research, professional recognition or paid work. Pliny’s grant and the individual professional connections provide observable routes to investigate. They do not tell us the community’s internal finances. A dated roster, a public project and a disclosed award each illuminate a different part of the same emerging research environment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "BASI is the public community linked from Pliny’s project hub for AI red teamers and prompt engineers. It belongs in this investigation because communities can supply something institutions cannot simply purchase off a shelf: a continuing exchange of unusual techniques, practical judgment and people who know how to make systems behave differently. The public community is a venue for that exchange.\n\nBT6 is the associated research collective discussed in Pliny and John V’s interview. Its public operator list provides a way to follow particular practitioners into other work. Keeping the community and collective separate makes the map useful: participation in a broad discussion space is a different relationship from appearing on a named working roster.\n\nThe structural question is how openly exchanged knowledge becomes organized research, professional recognition or paid work. Pliny’s grant and the individual professional connections provide observable routes to investigate. They do not tell us the community’s internal finances. A dated roster, a public project and a disclosed award each illuminate a different part of the same emerging research environment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Pliny’s public project hub directs readers to the BASI community.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-pliny-community"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Links public community",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "BASI community",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-09-13; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "heading": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub connects public tools, BT6 and the BASI community. A Latent Space interview presents Pliny and John V’s case for open research. John V’s dated roster identifies operators with other professional roles. These are distinct circles of activity, not interchangeable names for a proven corporate hierarchy.",
            "matched": [
              "BASI community"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b49c99843b7994de650e829ba2dfe4a52c4e54acc99163b664d40f2a71ebbf67"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The public community linked from Pliny’s project hub, connecting AI red teamers and prompt engineers around open experimentation.",
          "structuralRole": "Community and knowledge exchange",
          "significance": "The structural question is how openly exchanged knowledge becomes organized research, professional recognition or paid work. Pliny’s grant and the individual professional connections provide observable routes to investigate. They do not tell us the community’s internal finances. A dated roster, a public project and a disclosed award each illuminate a different part of the same emerging research environment.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "BASI is the public community linked from Pliny’s project hub for AI red teamers and prompt engineers. It belongs in this investigation because communities can supply something institutions cannot simply purchase off a shelf: a continuing exchange of unusual techniques, practical judgment and people who know how to make systems behave differently. The public community is a venue for that exchange.",
            "BT6 is the associated research collective discussed in Pliny and John V’s interview. Its public operator list provides a way to follow particular practitioners into other work. Keeping the community and collective separate makes the map useful: participation in a broad discussion space is a different relationship from appearing on a named working roster.",
            "The structural question is how openly exchanged knowledge becomes organized research, professional recognition or paid work. Pliny’s grant and the individual professional connections provide observable routes to investigate. They do not tell us the community’s internal finances. A dated roster, a public project and a disclosed award each illuminate a different part of the same emerging research environment."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
              "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
              "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-bt6",
      "label": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
      "type": "group",
      "summary": "An AI security collective publicly associated with Pliny and John V; its operator roster links community experimentation to professional security work.",
      "roles": [
        "Organized research collective"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "BT6",
        "BASI Team Six",
        "Basilisk Team 6",
        "Basilisk Team Six"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-bt6",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-bt6",
        "name": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
        "role": "Organized research collective",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "An AI security collective publicly associated with Pliny and John V; its operator roster links community experimentation to professional security work.",
        "why": "An AI security collective publicly associated with Pliny and John V; its operator roster links community experimentation to professional security work.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "BT6",
          "BASI Team Six",
          "Basilisk Team 6",
          "Basilisk Team Six"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          },
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
            "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An AI security collective publicly associated with Pliny and John V; its operator roster links community experimentation to professional security work.",
        "structuralRole": "Organized research collective",
        "significance": "The key distinction is between shared participation and organizational authority. The roster supplies the first; contracts and governance records would be needed for the second. For now, the useful picture is a network of collaborating specialists with an openness-oriented public stance, not a single employer whose every member has the same client, funding or obligation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "BT6, also called BASI Team Six, is the working collective in this part of the map. Public interview material associates its leadership with Pliny and John V. John V’s September2025 roster identifies several operators whose other public work can be followed separately, including Philip Dursey, Marco Figueroa and Joey Melo. This gives the collective a more concrete shape than a list of social-media followers.\n\nIts connections reach different professional settings. John V is listed with Lysios in an industry panel; Figueroa works around a bug-bounty program; Melo appears in a vendor’s competition results; Dursey has an author and company-founder profile. These connections explain why the group matters beyond online argument: it brings together practitioners whose research can circulate through several institutions.\n\nThe key distinction is between shared participation and organizational authority. The roster supplies the first; contracts and governance records would be needed for the second. For now, the useful picture is a network of collaborating specialists with an openness-oriented public stance, not a single employer whose every member has the same client, funding or obligation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              },
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              },
              {
                "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
                "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V appears alongside Pliny in the BT6 interview and publishes an operator list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-john-bt6"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              },
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "John V",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
            "sourceName": "John V",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Latent Space interview introduces Pliny and John V as leaders of BT6.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-pliny-bt6"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Philip A. Dursey.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
            "sourceName": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Marco Figueroa.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marco Figueroa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
            "sourceName": "Marco Figueroa",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Joey Melo.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-joey-melo-roster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Joey Melo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
            "sourceName": "Joey Melo",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "heading": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub connects public tools, BT6 and the BASI community. A Latent Space interview presents Pliny and John V’s case for open research. John V’s dated roster identifies operators with other professional roles. These are distinct circles of activity, not interchangeable names for a proven corporate hierarchy.",
            "matched": [
              "BT6"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b49c99843b7994de650e829ba2dfe4a52c4e54acc99163b664d40f2a71ebbf67"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          },
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
            "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "An AI security collective publicly associated with Pliny and John V; its operator roster links community experimentation to professional security work.",
          "structuralRole": "Organized research collective",
          "significance": "The key distinction is between shared participation and organizational authority. The roster supplies the first; contracts and governance records would be needed for the second. For now, the useful picture is a network of collaborating specialists with an openness-oriented public stance, not a single employer whose every member has the same client, funding or obligation.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "BT6, also called BASI Team Six, is the working collective in this part of the map. Public interview material associates its leadership with Pliny and John V. John V’s September2025 roster identifies several operators whose other public work can be followed separately, including Philip Dursey, Marco Figueroa and Joey Melo. This gives the collective a more concrete shape than a list of social-media followers.",
            "Its connections reach different professional settings. John V is listed with Lysios in an industry panel; Figueroa works around a bug-bounty program; Melo appears in a vendor’s competition results; Dursey has an author and company-founder profile. These connections explain why the group matters beyond online argument: it brings together practitioners whose research can circulate through several institutions.",
            "The key distinction is between shared participation and organizational authority. The roster supplies the first; contracts and governance records would be needed for the second. For now, the useful picture is a network of collaborating specialists with an openness-oriented public stance, not a single employer whose every member has the same client, funding or obligation."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
              "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
            },
            {
              "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
              "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
            },
            {
              "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
              "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-lysios",
      "label": "Lysios — AI research organization",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Independent AI research organization credited by OpenAI for red teaming; public event records list John V with Lysios.",
      "roles": [
        "External research and evaluation participant"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-lysios",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-lysios",
        "name": "Lysios — AI research organization",
        "role": "External research and evaluation participant",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Independent AI research organization credited by OpenAI for red teaming; public event records list John V with Lysios.",
        "why": "Independent AI research organization credited by OpenAI for red teaming; public event records list John V with Lysios.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lysios: research mission",
            "url": "https://lysios.ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Independent AI research organization credited by OpenAI for red teaming; public event records list John V with Lysios.",
        "structuralRole": "External research and evaluation participant",
        "significance": "What makes this node worth following is the practical arrangement behind outside testing: access, payment, publication permission and the handling of findings. Acknowledgments establish participation but do not disclose those terms. The next revealing evidence would be a public engagement description or agreement showing what the researchers were permitted to inspect and communicate, and how the developer used their findings.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Lysios describes itself as an independent AI research organization working on adversarial testing, tools, interpretability and related questions. In the public records reviewed here, its most significant institutional connection is OpenAI: the Operator and Deep Research system cards name Lysios LLC among contributors to red teaming. That places the organization inside the published account of how frontier systems were assessed.\n\nThere is also a personnel route into the BASI and BT6 neighborhood. TrojAI’s event page identifies John V as an AI red-team specialist with Lysios, while separate interview material associates him with BT6. This is a useful bridge because it joins a named practitioner, a collective and a credited research organization without relying on the similarity of their branding.\n\nWhat makes this node worth following is the practical arrangement behind outside testing: access, payment, publication permission and the handling of findings. Acknowledgments establish participation but do not disclose those terms. The next revealing evidence would be a public engagement description or agreement showing what the researchers were permitted to inspect and communicate, and how the developer used their findings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lysios: research mission",
                "url": "https://lysios.ai/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "OpenAI names Lysios LLC among the red-teaming organizations in the Operator System Card.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-operator-credit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Credits external red teaming: Operator",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-01-23; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Lysios LLC appears in the Deep Research System Card acknowledgments, section5.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-deep-credit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
                "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Credits external red teaming: Deep Research",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TrojAI’s organizer page identifies John Vaina with Lysios.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-john-lysios"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "John V",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as AI red-team specialist",
            "sourceName": "John V",
            "targetName": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lysios: research mission",
            "url": "https://lysios.ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Independent AI research organization credited by OpenAI for red teaming; public event records list John V with Lysios.",
          "structuralRole": "External research and evaluation participant",
          "significance": "What makes this node worth following is the practical arrangement behind outside testing: access, payment, publication permission and the handling of findings. Acknowledgments establish participation but do not disclose those terms. The next revealing evidence would be a public engagement description or agreement showing what the researchers were permitted to inspect and communicate, and how the developer used their findings.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Lysios describes itself as an independent AI research organization working on adversarial testing, tools, interpretability and related questions. In the public records reviewed here, its most significant institutional connection is OpenAI: the Operator and Deep Research system cards name Lysios LLC among contributors to red teaming. That places the organization inside the published account of how frontier systems were assessed.",
            "There is also a personnel route into the BASI and BT6 neighborhood. TrojAI’s event page identifies John V as an AI red-team specialist with Lysios, while separate interview material associates him with BT6. This is a useful bridge because it joins a named practitioner, a collective and a credited research organization without relying on the similarity of their branding.",
            "What makes this node worth following is the practical arrangement behind outside testing: access, payment, publication permission and the handling of findings. Acknowledgments establish participation but do not disclose those terms. The next revealing evidence would be a public engagement description or agreement showing what the researchers were permitted to inspect and communicate, and how the developer used their findings."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Lysios: research mission",
              "url": "https://lysios.ai/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
              "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
              "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
              "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-john-v",
      "label": "John V",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Publicly appears with Pliny as a BT6 leader and is identified by TrojAI as a Lysios AI red-team specialist.",
      "roles": [
        "Personnel bridge between collective and research organization"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "John Vaina",
        "Johnvspecialist",
        "JohnVersus"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-john-v",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-john-v",
        "name": "John V",
        "role": "Personnel bridge between collective and research organization",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Publicly appears with Pliny as a BT6 leader and is identified by TrojAI as a Lysios AI red-team specialist.",
        "why": "Publicly appears with Pliny as a BT6 leader and is identified by TrojAI as a Lysios AI red-team specialist.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "John Vaina",
          "Johnvspecialist",
          "JohnVersus"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          },
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Publicly appears with Pliny as a BT6 leader and is identified by TrojAI as a Lysios AI red-team specialist.",
        "structuralRole": "Personnel bridge between collective and research organization",
        "significance": "This is a stronger basis for understanding his role than speculative titles or inferred ownership. The records reviewed do not supply his contracting authority, compensation or power to commit either organization. Those are useful future questions because they determine whether a personnel bridge is also a bridge for money, decision-making or the transfer of research obligations.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "John V is a public AI security practitioner who appears with Pliny in the BT6 interview. An industry event organizer identifies him as John Vaina, an AI red-team specialist at Lysios. His own dated operator list also makes him a useful source for understanding which practitioners he publicly associated with BT6 in September2025.\n\nHis structural importance is the personnel connection between the collective and the research organization. A reader can move from his interview role to the organizer’s professional listing and then to OpenAI’s acknowledgment of Lysios. Each step answers a different question: who speaks for a group, where a practitioner is publicly placed, and which organization a developer credits for testing.\n\nThis is a stronger basis for understanding his role than speculative titles or inferred ownership. The records reviewed do not supply his contracting authority, compensation or power to commit either organization. Those are useful future questions because they determine whether a personnel bridge is also a bridge for money, decision-making or the transfer of research obligations.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              },
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V appears alongside Pliny in the BT6 interview and publishes an operator list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-john-bt6"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
                "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
              },
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
            "sourceName": "John V",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TrojAI’s organizer page identifies John Vaina with Lysios.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-john-lysios"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as AI red-team specialist",
            "sourceName": "John V",
            "targetName": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "heading": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "text": "The institutional links are tangible. OpenAI credits Lysios for external testing . TrojAI lists John V with Lysios . a16z names Pliny as a grant recipient . Grants, professional roles and testing credits are the working connections here.",
            "matched": [
              "John V"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "743becb013effd1edb3261db444ec4ce4a6391a35b2954548d3f5cd774dc72ec"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "heading": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub connects public tools, BT6 and the BASI community. A Latent Space interview presents Pliny and John V’s case for open research. John V’s dated roster identifies operators with other professional roles. These are distinct circles of activity, not interchangeable names for a proven corporate hierarchy.",
            "matched": [
              "John V"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "b49c99843b7994de650e829ba2dfe4a52c4e54acc99163b664d40f2a71ebbf67"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
            "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
          },
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Publicly appears with Pliny as a BT6 leader and is identified by TrojAI as a Lysios AI red-team specialist.",
          "structuralRole": "Personnel bridge between collective and research organization",
          "significance": "This is a stronger basis for understanding his role than speculative titles or inferred ownership. The records reviewed do not supply his contracting authority, compensation or power to commit either organization. Those are useful future questions because they determine whether a personnel bridge is also a bridge for money, decision-making or the transfer of research obligations.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "John V is a public AI security practitioner who appears with Pliny in the BT6 interview. An industry event organizer identifies him as John Vaina, an AI red-team specialist at Lysios. His own dated operator list also makes him a useful source for understanding which practitioners he publicly associated with BT6 in September2025.",
            "His structural importance is the personnel connection between the collective and the research organization. A reader can move from his interview role to the organizer’s professional listing and then to OpenAI’s acknowledgment of Lysios. Each step answers a different question: who speaks for a group, where a practitioner is publicly placed, and which organization a developer credits for testing.",
            "This is a stronger basis for understanding his role than speculative titles or inferred ownership. The records reviewed do not supply his contracting authority, compensation or power to commit either organization. Those are useful future questions because they determine whether a personnel bridge is also a bridge for money, decision-making or the transfer of research obligations."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
              "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator"
            },
            {
              "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
              "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
            },
            {
              "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
              "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-philip-dursey",
      "label": "Philip A. Dursey",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Listed by John V as a BT6 operator; the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as its author and HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
      "roles": [
        "Security practitioner, author and company founder"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Philip Dursey"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-philip-dursey",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-philip-dursey",
        "name": "Philip A. Dursey",
        "role": "Security practitioner, author and company founder",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Listed by John V as a BT6 operator; the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as its author and HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
        "why": "Listed by John V as a BT6 operator; the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as its author and HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Philip Dursey"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
            "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Listed by John V as a BT6 operator; the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as its author and HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
        "structuralRole": "Security practitioner, author and company founder",
        "significance": "The useful follow-up is to establish how those activities actually relate: published methods, company products, clients and any disclosed funding. We have not recovered a financial relationship between HYPERGAME and BT6 or an investor list for the company. Dursey is included for the concrete public roles already visible, while those commercial relationships remain a research lead.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Philip A. Dursey appears in John V’s public BT6 operator list. Separately, the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as the book’s author and as founder and CEO of HYPERGAME, a company described as developing AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling. The publisher biography was available as a search-indexed excerpt in this pass; the full page could not be inspected.\n\nHis place in the structure connects three kinds of work: collective participation, professional instruction and a commercial venture. A book can turn specialist practice into repeatable methods for a wider audience. A tooling company can turn those methods into a product or service. The roster shows a community connection alongside those public professional activities.\n\nThe useful follow-up is to establish how those activities actually relate: published methods, company products, clients and any disclosed funding. We have not recovered a financial relationship between HYPERGAME and BT6 or an investor list for the company. Dursey is included for the concrete public roles already visible, while those commercial relationships remain a research lead.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              },
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "No Starch Press lists Philip A. Dursey as the author of Red Teaming AI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-dursey-book"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Red Teaming AI — Philip A. Dursey",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named author",
            "sourceName": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "targetName": "Red Teaming AI — Philip A. Dursey",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Philip A. Dursey.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
            "sourceName": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Dursey’s publisher biography identifies him as HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-dursey-hypergame"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "HYPERGAME",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Publisher identifies founder and CEO",
            "sourceName": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "targetName": "HYPERGAME",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
            "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Listed by John V as a BT6 operator; the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as its author and HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
          "structuralRole": "Security practitioner, author and company founder",
          "significance": "The useful follow-up is to establish how those activities actually relate: published methods, company products, clients and any disclosed funding. We have not recovered a financial relationship between HYPERGAME and BT6 or an investor list for the company. Dursey is included for the concrete public roles already visible, while those commercial relationships remain a research lead.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Philip A. Dursey appears in John V’s public BT6 operator list. Separately, the publisher of Red Teaming AI identifies him as the book’s author and as founder and CEO of HYPERGAME, a company described as developing AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling. The publisher biography was available as a search-indexed excerpt in this pass; the full page could not be inspected.",
            "His place in the structure connects three kinds of work: collective participation, professional instruction and a commercial venture. A book can turn specialist practice into repeatable methods for a wider audience. A tooling company can turn those methods into a product or service. The roster shows a community connection alongside those public professional activities.",
            "The useful follow-up is to establish how those activities actually relate: published methods, company products, clients and any disclosed funding. We have not recovered a financial relationship between HYPERGAME and BT6 or an investor list for the company. Dursey is included for the concrete public roles already visible, while those commercial relationships remain a research lead."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
              "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
            },
            {
              "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
              "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-13"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-hypergame",
      "label": "HYPERGAME",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The company identified in Philip Dursey’s publisher biography as his AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling venture.",
      "roles": [
        "Commercial security tooling"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-hypergame",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-hypergame",
        "name": "HYPERGAME",
        "role": "Commercial security tooling",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "The company identified in Philip Dursey’s publisher biography as his AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling venture.",
        "why": "The company identified in Philip Dursey’s publisher biography as his AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling venture.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
            "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The company identified in Philip Dursey’s publisher biography as his AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling venture.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial security tooling",
        "significance": "The company identified in Philip Dursey’s publisher biography as his AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling venture.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The company identified in Philip Dursey’s publisher biography as his AI cyber-defense and red-team tooling venture.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Dursey’s publisher biography identifies him as HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-dursey-hypergame"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Publisher identifies founder and CEO",
            "sourceName": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "targetName": "HYPERGAME",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
            "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-red-teaming-ai",
      "label": "Red Teaming AI — Philip A. Dursey",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A No Starch Press book listed under Philip A. Dursey, connecting AI security practice with professional instruction.",
      "roles": [
        "Published security knowledge"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-red-teaming-ai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-red-teaming-ai",
        "name": "Red Teaming AI — Philip A. Dursey",
        "role": "Published security knowledge",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "A No Starch Press book listed under Philip A. Dursey, connecting AI security practice with professional instruction.",
        "why": "A No Starch Press book listed under Philip A. Dursey, connecting AI security practice with professional instruction.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
            "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A No Starch Press book listed under Philip A. Dursey, connecting AI security practice with professional instruction.",
        "structuralRole": "Published security knowledge",
        "significance": "A No Starch Press book listed under Philip A. Dursey, connecting AI security practice with professional instruction.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "A No Starch Press book listed under Philip A. Dursey, connecting AI security practice with professional instruction.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "No Starch Press lists Philip A. Dursey as the author of Red Teaming AI.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-dursey-book"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
                "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named author",
            "sourceName": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "targetName": "Red Teaming AI — Philip A. Dursey",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
            "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-marco-figueroa",
      "label": "Marco Figueroa",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "0DIN/Mozilla program manager in TrojAI’s event record, coauthor with Pliny of Basilisk Venom, and an operator listed by John V.",
      "roles": [
        "Bug-bounty programs and collaborative research"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-marco-figueroa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-marco-figueroa",
        "name": "Marco Figueroa",
        "role": "Bug-bounty programs and collaborative research",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "0DIN/Mozilla program manager in TrojAI’s event record, coauthor with Pliny of Basilisk Venom, and an operator listed by John V.",
        "why": "0DIN/Mozilla program manager in TrojAI’s event record, coauthor with Pliny of Basilisk Venom, and an operator listed by John V.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "0DIN/Mozilla program manager in TrojAI’s event record, coauthor with Pliny of Basilisk Venom, and an operator listed by John V.",
        "structuralRole": "Bug-bounty programs and collaborative research",
        "significance": "0DIN/Mozilla program manager in TrojAI’s event record, coauthor with Pliny of Basilisk Venom, and an operator listed by John V.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "0DIN/Mozilla program manager in TrojAI’s event record, coauthor with Pliny of Basilisk Venom, and an operator listed by John V.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TrojAI identifies Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla’s GenAI bug-bounty program manager.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-marco-0din"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "0DIN",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as program manager",
            "sourceName": "Marco Figueroa",
            "targetName": "0DIN",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Marco Figueroa.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
            "sourceName": "Marco Figueroa",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The February6,2025 article names Marco Figueroa as coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-venom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthors research report",
            "sourceName": "Marco Figueroa",
            "targetName": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "heading": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
            "text": "One technical claim deserves care. In Basilisk Venom , Pliny and Marco Figueroa interpret elicited model behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion. It is an attributed research claim, not a recovered training log or proof of a network intrusion.",
            "matched": [
              "Marco Figueroa",
              "Figueroa"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d7c2cf958cf620f865c6cdbc2243cc17bff5c21707c50eb12c8025fab46e2ad9"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-0din",
      "label": "0DIN",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "AI security bug-bounty program associated with Mozilla in the event record; publisher of Pliny and Marco Figueroa’s Basilisk Venom article.",
      "roles": [
        "Vulnerability research and disclosure venue"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-0din",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-0din",
        "name": "0DIN",
        "role": "Vulnerability research and disclosure venue",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "AI security bug-bounty program associated with Mozilla in the event record; publisher of Pliny and Marco Figueroa’s Basilisk Venom article.",
        "why": "AI security bug-bounty program associated with Mozilla in the event record; publisher of Pliny and Marco Figueroa’s Basilisk Venom article.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI security bug-bounty program associated with Mozilla in the event record; publisher of Pliny and Marco Figueroa’s Basilisk Venom article.",
        "structuralRole": "Vulnerability research and disclosure venue",
        "significance": "AI security bug-bounty program associated with Mozilla in the event record; publisher of Pliny and Marco Figueroa’s Basilisk Venom article.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "AI security bug-bounty program associated with Mozilla in the event record; publisher of Pliny and Marco Figueroa’s Basilisk Venom article.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "0DIN hosts the Basilisk Venom article and its authors’ interpretation of model behavior.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-0din-venom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes research report",
            "sourceName": "0DIN",
            "targetName": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TrojAI identifies Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla’s GenAI bug-bounty program manager.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-marco-0din"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
                "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marco Figueroa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as program manager",
            "sourceName": "Marco Figueroa",
            "targetName": "0DIN",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
            "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-basilisk-venom",
      "label": "Basilisk Venom research report",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "February2025 article by Marco Figueroa and Pliny interpreting model behavior as evidence of training-data poisoning.",
      "roles": [
        "Published technical claim"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-basilisk-venom",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-basilisk-venom",
        "name": "Basilisk Venom research report",
        "role": "Published technical claim",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "February2025 article by Marco Figueroa and Pliny interpreting model behavior as evidence of training-data poisoning.",
        "why": "February2025 article by Marco Figueroa and Pliny interpreting model behavior as evidence of training-data poisoning.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "February2025 article by Marco Figueroa and Pliny interpreting model behavior as evidence of training-data poisoning.",
        "structuralRole": "Published technical claim",
        "significance": "February2025 article by Marco Figueroa and Pliny interpreting model behavior as evidence of training-data poisoning.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "February2025 article by Marco Figueroa and Pliny interpreting model behavior as evidence of training-data poisoning.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "0DIN hosts the Basilisk Venom article and its authors’ interpretation of model behavior.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-0din-venom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "0DIN",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes research report",
            "sourceName": "0DIN",
            "targetName": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The February6,2025 article names Pliny the Liberator as coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-pliny-venom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthors research report",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "The February6,2025 article names Marco Figueroa as coauthor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-venom"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
                "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marco Figueroa",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthors research report",
            "sourceName": "Marco Figueroa",
            "targetName": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
            "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-joey-melo",
      "label": "Joey Melo",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Ethical hacker identified by Pangea as its AI challenge winner and listed by John V among BT6 operators.",
      "roles": [
        "Practitioner connecting collective and commercial testing"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-joey-melo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-joey-melo",
        "name": "Joey Melo",
        "role": "Practitioner connecting collective and commercial testing",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Ethical hacker identified by Pangea as its AI challenge winner and listed by John V among BT6 operators.",
        "why": "Ethical hacker identified by Pangea as its AI challenge winner and listed by John V among BT6 operators.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
            "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ethical hacker identified by Pangea as its AI challenge winner and listed by John V among BT6 operators.",
        "structuralRole": "Practitioner connecting collective and commercial testing",
        "significance": "Ethical hacker identified by Pangea as its AI challenge winner and listed by John V among BT6 operators.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Ethical hacker identified by Pangea as its AI challenge winner and listed by John V among BT6 operators.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
                "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pangea identifies Melo as overall winner of its $10,000 AI challenge, with top scores in all three rooms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-pangea-winner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
                "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pangea",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names overall challenge winner",
            "sourceName": "Pangea",
            "targetName": "Joey Melo",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-04-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Joey Melo.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-joey-melo-roster"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
                "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
            "sourceName": "Joey Melo",
            "targetName": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
            "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
            "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-pangea",
      "label": "Pangea",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Security vendor that organized a $10,000 AI prompt-injection challenge and named Joey Melo its overall winner.",
      "roles": [
        "Vendor-sponsored security competition"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-pangea",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-pangea",
        "name": "Pangea",
        "role": "Vendor-sponsored security competition",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Security vendor that organized a $10,000 AI prompt-injection challenge and named Joey Melo its overall winner.",
        "why": "Security vendor that organized a $10,000 AI prompt-injection challenge and named Joey Melo its overall winner.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
            "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Security vendor that organized a $10,000 AI prompt-injection challenge and named Joey Melo its overall winner.",
        "structuralRole": "Vendor-sponsored security competition",
        "significance": "Security vendor that organized a $10,000 AI prompt-injection challenge and named Joey Melo its overall winner.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Security vendor that organized a $10,000 AI prompt-injection challenge and named Joey Melo its overall winner.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
                "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pangea identifies Melo as overall winner of its $10,000 AI challenge, with top scores in all three rooms.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-pangea-winner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
                "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Joey Melo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names overall challenge winner",
            "sourceName": "Pangea",
            "targetName": "Joey Melo",
            "date": "Event or period: 2025-04-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
            "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-sans",
      "label": "SANS Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Cybersecurity training organization that announced Pliny as a keynote speaker for its April2026 AI security summit.",
      "roles": [
        "Professional training and conference access"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-sans",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-sans",
        "name": "SANS Institute",
        "role": "Professional training and conference access",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Cybersecurity training organization that announced Pliny as a keynote speaker for its April2026 AI security summit.",
        "why": "Cybersecurity training organization that announced Pliny as a keynote speaker for its April2026 AI security summit.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
            "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Cybersecurity training organization that announced Pliny as a keynote speaker for its April2026 AI security summit.",
        "structuralRole": "Professional training and conference access",
        "significance": "Cybersecurity training organization that announced Pliny as a keynote speaker for its April2026 AI security summit.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Cybersecurity training organization that announced Pliny as a keynote speaker for its April2026 AI security summit.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
                "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "SANS announced Pliny as a keynote for its April20-21,2026 AI security summit.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-sans-speaker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
                "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces keynote speaker",
            "sourceName": "SANS Institute",
            "targetName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-02-25; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
            "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-libertas",
      "label": "L1B3RT4S / Libertas",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Pliny’s publicly linked collection of AI jailbreak research and prompts.",
      "roles": [
        "Public distribution of research methods"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-libertas",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-libertas",
        "name": "L1B3RT4S / Libertas",
        "role": "Public distribution of research methods",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Pliny’s publicly linked collection of AI jailbreak research and prompts.",
        "why": "Pliny’s publicly linked collection of AI jailbreak research and prompts.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Pliny’s publicly linked collection of AI jailbreak research and prompts.",
        "structuralRole": "Public distribution of research methods",
        "significance": "Pliny’s publicly linked collection of AI jailbreak research and prompts.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Pliny’s publicly linked collection of AI jailbreak research and prompts.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub links L1B3RT4S / Libertas.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-libertas-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lists public research project",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "L1B3RT4S / Libertas",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-claritas",
      "label": "CL4R1T4S / Claritas",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Pliny’s publicly linked system-prompt transparency project.",
      "roles": [
        "Public access to model-behavior documentation"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w39-claritas",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-claritas",
        "name": "CL4R1T4S / Claritas",
        "role": "Public access to model-behavior documentation",
        "area": "AI research & security",
        "intro": "Pliny’s publicly linked system-prompt transparency project.",
        "why": "Pliny’s publicly linked system-prompt transparency project.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Pliny’s publicly linked system-prompt transparency project.",
        "structuralRole": "Public access to model-behavior documentation",
        "significance": "Pliny’s publicly linked system-prompt transparency project.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Pliny’s publicly linked system-prompt transparency project.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Pliny’s project hub links CL4R1T4S / Claritas.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w39-e-w39-claritas-publisher"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
                "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lists public research project",
            "sourceName": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "targetName": "CL4R1T4S / Claritas",
            "date": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
            "url": "https://pliny.gg/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
            "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-13"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-elsayed",
      "label": "Abdul El-Sayed",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Michigan Senate candidate advocating public ownership and governance of frontier AI companies. His June2026 platform links ownership, corporate boards and independent testing.",
      "roles": [
        "Campaigner for public control of AI governance"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Abdul El Sayed"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-elsayed",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-elsayed",
        "name": "Abdul El-Sayed",
        "role": "Campaigner for public control of AI governance",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Michigan Senate candidate advocating public ownership and governance of frontier AI companies. His June2026 platform links ownership, corporate boards and independent testing.",
        "why": "Michigan Senate candidate advocating public ownership and governance of frontier AI companies. His June2026 platform links ownership, corporate boards and independent testing.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Abdul El Sayed"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed interview transcript, September13",
            "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Michigan Senate candidate advocating public ownership and governance of frontier AI companies. His June2026 platform links ownership, corporate boards and independent testing.",
        "structuralRole": "Campaigner for public control of AI governance",
        "significance": "His explicit support for Sanders’s wealth-fund proposal connects this platform to an existing actor in the investigation. The practical question is how representatives would be selected and constrained once public authority enters company governance. A public-interest mandate does not itself settle whose judgment prevails in a dispute. The proposal’s appointment rules, voting powers and review mechanisms are the records to inspect.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Abdul El-Sayed’s AI platform makes corporate governance part of the safety argument. The campaign’s stated aim is to give the public a direct say in a technology built from shared knowledge, while protecting jobs, civil rights and public welfare. It links a claim about who contributed to AI with a claim about who should benefit and decide.\n\nThe institutional design combines different powers: public ownership, public influence over boards and outside testing. A dividend distributes returns. A board vote can influence company decisions. An evaluator can supply information or become part of a release requirement. Those mechanisms are worth separating because each creates a different role, constituency and opportunity for accountability.\n\nHis explicit support for Sanders’s wealth-fund proposal connects this platform to an existing actor in the investigation. The practical question is how representatives would be selected and constrained once public authority enters company governance. A public-interest mandate does not itself settle whose judgment prevails in a dispute. The proposal’s appointment rules, voting powers and review mechanisms are the records to inspect.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed interview transcript, September13",
                "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "El-Sayed’s platform explicitly supports Sanders’s public-ownership proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-supports-wealth"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly supports Sanders proposal",
            "sourceName": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The campaign released AI Under Democracy on June29,2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes campaign platform",
            "sourceName": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "targetName": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed interview transcript, September13",
            "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/"
          },
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Michigan Senate candidate advocating public ownership and governance of frontier AI companies. His June2026 platform links ownership, corporate boards and independent testing.",
          "structuralRole": "Campaigner for public control of AI governance",
          "significance": "His explicit support for Sanders’s wealth-fund proposal connects this platform to an existing actor in the investigation. The practical question is how representatives would be selected and constrained once public authority enters company governance. A public-interest mandate does not itself settle whose judgment prevails in a dispute. The proposal’s appointment rules, voting powers and review mechanisms are the records to inspect.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Abdul El-Sayed’s AI platform makes corporate governance part of the safety argument. The campaign’s stated aim is to give the public a direct say in a technology built from shared knowledge, while protecting jobs, civil rights and public welfare. It links a claim about who contributed to AI with a claim about who should benefit and decide.",
            "The institutional design combines different powers: public ownership, public influence over boards and outside testing. A dividend distributes returns. A board vote can influence company decisions. An evaluator can supply information or become part of a release requirement. Those mechanisms are worth separating because each creates a different role, constituency and opportunity for accountability.",
            "His explicit support for Sanders’s wealth-fund proposal connects this platform to an existing actor in the investigation. The practical question is how representatives would be selected and constrained once public authority enters company governance. A public-interest mandate does not itself settle whose judgment prevails in a dispute. The proposal’s appointment rules, voting powers and review mechanisms are the records to inspect."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
              "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
            },
            {
              "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
              "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
            },
            {
              "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
              "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
            },
            {
              "title": "El-Sayed interview transcript, September13",
              "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
      "label": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Campaign platform published June29,2026, proposing public benefit duties, majority public board representation and independent safety evaluation.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed corporate-governance and testing rules"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-ai-under-democracy",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
        "name": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
        "role": "Proposed corporate-governance and testing rules",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Campaign platform published June29,2026, proposing public benefit duties, majority public board representation and independent safety evaluation.",
        "why": "Campaign platform published June29,2026, proposing public benefit duties, majority public board representation and independent safety evaluation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Campaign platform published June29,2026, proposing public benefit duties, majority public board representation and independent safety evaluation.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed corporate-governance and testing rules",
        "significance": "Campaign platform published June29,2026, proposing public benefit duties, majority public board representation and independent safety evaluation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Campaign platform published June29,2026, proposing public benefit duties, majority public board representation and independent safety evaluation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The platform calls for predeployment evaluation outside the developer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-testing-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Independent AI safety testing agency — El-Sayed proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would create independent testing agency",
            "sourceName": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "targetName": "Independent AI safety testing agency — El-Sayed proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Proposed board rule: 50%+1 of seats publicly appointed or elected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-board-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Majority public AI board seats — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would require majority public seats",
            "sourceName": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "targetName": "Majority public AI board seats — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The campaign released AI Under Democracy on June29,2026.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes campaign platform",
            "sourceName": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "targetName": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-public-board-majority",
      "label": "Majority public AI board seats — proposed",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "El-Sayed proposes 50%+1 of frontier-company board seats be publicly appointed or democratically elected.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed transfer of board selection rights"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-public-board-majority",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-public-board-majority",
        "name": "Majority public AI board seats — proposed",
        "role": "Proposed transfer of board selection rights",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "El-Sayed proposes 50%+1 of frontier-company board seats be publicly appointed or democratically elected.",
        "why": "El-Sayed proposes 50%+1 of frontier-company board seats be publicly appointed or democratically elected.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "El-Sayed proposes 50%+1 of frontier-company board seats be publicly appointed or democratically elected.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed transfer of board selection rights",
        "significance": "El-Sayed proposes 50%+1 of frontier-company board seats be publicly appointed or democratically elected.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "El-Sayed proposes 50%+1 of frontier-company board seats be publicly appointed or democratically elected.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Proposed board rule: 50%+1 of seats publicly appointed or elected.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-board-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would require majority public seats",
            "sourceName": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "targetName": "Majority public AI board seats — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
      "label": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Sanders announced this proposal in June2026. It would obtain public equity through a tax settled in newly issued shares.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed equity transfer and public governance"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-ai-wealth-act",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
        "name": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
        "role": "Proposed equity transfer and public governance",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Sanders announced this proposal in June2026. It would obtain public equity through a tax settled in newly issued shares.",
        "why": "Sanders announced this proposal in June2026. It would obtain public equity through a tax settled in newly issued shares.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
          },
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Sanders announced this proposal in June2026. It would obtain public equity through a tax settled in newly issued shares.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed transfer of equity and shareholder power",
        "significance": "The proposed fund combines economic returns with governance rights.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The office estimates a $7trillion fund at then-current valuations; that is a forecast. The linked legislative draft imposes a share-settled tax and would separate covered AI and non-AI businesses. Its operative company threshold is over $200million in covered annual gross receipts. These are proposed provisions, not current ownership. Later equity issuances would trigger additional remittance. The text provides an appropriation route; it does not automatically issue individual dividend payments.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
              },
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Seven commissioners would be presidentially appointed with Senate confirmation through specified congressional nomination lists.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-establish-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would establish Treasury commission",
            "sourceName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "targetName": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Sanders’s office announced introduction on June18; the linked text retains blank procedural fields.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-announces-wealth"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
              },
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces legislation",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The proposal would collect newly issued equity leaving the public holder with 50% after remittance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-establish-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would establish public equity fund",
            "sourceName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "El-Sayed’s platform explicitly supports Sanders’s public-ownership proposal.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-supports-wealth"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publicly supports Sanders proposal",
            "sourceName": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/"
          },
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-ai-public-fund",
      "label": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A proposed public holder of AI-company equity, intended to fund public benefits and exercise shareholder rights.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed public ownership institution"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-ai-public-fund",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-ai-public-fund",
        "name": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
        "role": "Proposed public ownership institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A proposed public holder of AI-company equity, intended to fund public benefits and exercise shareholder rights.",
        "why": "A proposed public holder of AI-company equity, intended to fund public benefits and exercise shareholder rights.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A proposed public holder of AI-company equity, intended to fund public benefits and exercise shareholder rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed public ownership institution",
        "significance": "A proposed public holder of AI-company equity, intended to fund public benefits and exercise shareholder rights.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "A proposed public holder of AI-company equity, intended to fund public benefits and exercise shareholder rights.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The commission would exercise the fund’s voting rights and designate board representatives within its shareholding entitlement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-manage-vote"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would manage fund and exercise rights",
            "sourceName": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The proposal would collect newly issued equity leaving the public holder with 50% after remittance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-establish-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would establish public equity fund",
            "sourceName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The draft assigns commission operating costs to the fund’s assets and income.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-fund-operations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would finance commission operations",
            "sourceName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "targetName": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
      "label": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "The draft would place a seven-member commission in Treasury to manage the fund and exercise its ownership rights.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed fund manager and shareholder decision-maker"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-democratic-ai-commission",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
        "name": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
        "role": "Proposed fund manager and shareholder decision-maker",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The draft would place a seven-member commission in Treasury to manage the fund and exercise its ownership rights.",
        "why": "The draft would place a seven-member commission in Treasury to manage the fund and exercise its ownership rights.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The draft would place a seven-member commission in Treasury to manage the fund and exercise its ownership rights.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed public shareholder decision-maker",
        "significance": "Selection and constraints determine how a public mandate becomes company decisions.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Commission membership would be appointed, not a direct nationwide election. The text includes for-cause removal, recusal and financial-conflict rules, public reporting of votes, and a prohibition on using cross-company voting rights to coordinate competitors. Those limits matter alongside the power to nominate board representatives. An internal drafting inconsistency needs resolution: one clause bars commissioners from company boards while a reporting clause describes commissioners serving on them.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Seven commissioners would be presidentially appointed with Senate confirmation through specified congressional nomination lists.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-establish-commission"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would establish Treasury commission",
            "sourceName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "targetName": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The commission would exercise the fund’s voting rights and designate board representatives within its shareholding entitlement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-manage-vote"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would manage fund and exercise rights",
            "sourceName": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "targetName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The draft assigns commission operating costs to the fund’s assets and income.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-fund-operations"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would finance commission operations",
            "sourceName": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "targetName": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-testing-agency",
      "label": "Independent AI safety testing agency — El-Sayed proposal",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "El-Sayed proposes an independent agency for predeployment assessment of frontier models.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed evaluation institution"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w40-testing-agency",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-testing-agency",
        "name": "Independent AI safety testing agency — El-Sayed proposal",
        "role": "Proposed evaluation institution",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "El-Sayed proposes an independent agency for predeployment assessment of frontier models.",
        "why": "El-Sayed proposes an independent agency for predeployment assessment of frontier models.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "El-Sayed proposes an independent agency for predeployment assessment of frontier models.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed evaluation institution",
        "significance": "El-Sayed proposes an independent agency for predeployment assessment of frontier models.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "El-Sayed proposes an independent agency for predeployment assessment of frontier models.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              },
              {
                "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The platform calls for predeployment evaluation outside the developer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w40-e-testing-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
                "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would create independent testing agency",
            "sourceName": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "targetName": "Independent AI safety testing agency — El-Sayed proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
            "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
            "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-gates",
      "label": "Gates Foundation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Philanthropy joining AI deployment projects across public services.",
      "roles": [
        "Funder and institutional convenor"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-gates",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-gates",
        "name": "Gates Foundation",
        "role": "Funder and institutional convenor",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Philanthropy joining AI deployment projects across public services.",
        "why": "Philanthropy joining AI deployment projects across public services.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Making AI work for more people",
            "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Philanthropy joining AI deployment projects across public services.",
        "structuralRole": "Connects resources, suppliers and public institutions",
        "significance": "The programme is a route through which AI and its data infrastructure enter public systems.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Gates and Anthropic announced their joint programme in May 2026. Their case is that public-service needs underserved by commercial markets warrant funding and shared infrastructure.\n\nThe implementation deserves attention alongside the grant headline. Data formats, benchmarks, interfaces and continuing access can affect which suppliers an institution can use later. Promised open assets could preserve portability; the implementation agreements will determine how well that works.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Named in METR’s 2024 account of the wider collective.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-gates-audacious"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Audacious Project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named funding-collective participant",
            "sourceName": "Gates Foundation",
            "targetName": "The Audacious Project",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "IDM identified as part of Gates Foundation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-idm-internal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Includes research group",
            "sourceName": "Gates Foundation",
            "targetName": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Combined $200m package over four years.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-gates-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joint programme partner",
            "sourceName": "Gates Foundation",
            "targetName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Making AI work for more people",
            "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
          },
          {
            "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure",
            "title": "Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Philanthropy joining AI deployment projects across public services.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects resources, suppliers and public institutions",
          "significance": "The programme is a route through which AI and its data infrastructure enter public systems.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Gates and Anthropic announced their joint programme in May 2026. Their case is that public-service needs underserved by commercial markets warrant funding and shared infrastructure.",
            "The implementation deserves attention alongside the grant headline. Data formats, benchmarks, interfaces and continuing access can affect which suppliers an institution can use later. Promised open assets could preserve portability; the implementation agreements will determine how well that works.",
            "The two branches shown here operate differently. The foundation is named in the wider Audacious funding collective, while its Anthropic programme is a direct announced partnership. Following each branch requires different evidence: donor allocations for the former, implementation agreements for the latter. The wider question is how philanthropic priorities become practical infrastructure used by public institutions. That can bring useful capacity while also making decisions about suppliers, technical standards and ongoing access unusually consequential for the people those institutions serve."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Making AI work for more people",
              "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
              "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-audacious",
      "label": "The Audacious Project",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "TED-hosted collaborative philanthropy supporting Canary.",
      "roles": [
        "Funding convenor"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-audacious",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-audacious",
        "name": "The Audacious Project",
        "role": "Funding convenor",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "TED-hosted collaborative philanthropy supporting Canary.",
        "why": "TED-hosted collaborative philanthropy supporting Canary.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canary grantee profile",
            "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "TED-hosted collaborative philanthropy supporting Canary.",
        "structuralRole": "Convenes philanthropic backing",
        "significance": "Canary connects collective philanthropy to evaluation capacity.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Audacious brings funders together around projects needing sustained support. Its Canary profile pairs METR with RAND and sets a 2027 goal for widely available pre-release evaluation capacity.\n\nThe financial record belongs to the project and its participants. Membership in the wider collective is a lead to donor records; it does not identify which member paid for which award.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canary grantee profile",
                "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Named in METR’s 2024 account of the wider collective.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-gates-audacious"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gates Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named funding-collective participant",
            "sourceName": "Gates Foundation",
            "targetName": "The Audacious Project",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Overall project funding announced in 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-audacious-canary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Catalyzed approximately $38m",
            "sourceName": "The Audacious Project",
            "targetName": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "date": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canary grantee profile",
            "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "TED-hosted collaborative philanthropy supporting Canary.",
          "structuralRole": "Convenes philanthropic backing",
          "significance": "Canary connects collective philanthropy to evaluation capacity.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Audacious brings funders together around projects needing sustained support. Its Canary profile pairs METR with RAND and sets a 2027 goal for widely available pre-release evaluation capacity.",
            "The financial record belongs to the project and its participants. Membership in the wider collective is a lead to donor records; it does not identify which member paid for which award.",
            "For this investigation, Audacious is an upstream institution with an identifiable downstream programme. Its role makes the grant agreements more revealing than a list of famous supporters. Those agreements could specify milestones, reporting obligations, intellectual-property conditions and renewal decisions. The published Canary account establishes an overall package and a METR allocation, giving us a starting point for that inquiry. The next step is to identify which decisions belong to the convenor, the individual donors and the research organisations receiving support."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
              "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Canary grantee profile",
              "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-canary",
      "label": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Joint frontier-model evaluation and biosecurity work.",
      "roles": [
        "Evaluation collaboration"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-canary",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-canary",
        "name": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
        "role": "Evaluation collaboration",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Joint frontier-model evaluation and biosecurity work.",
        "why": "Joint frontier-model evaluation and biosecurity work.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canary grantee profile",
            "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Joint frontier-model evaluation and biosecurity work.",
        "structuralRole": "Evaluation collaboration",
        "significance": "Joint frontier-model evaluation and biosecurity work.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Joint frontier-model evaluation and biosecurity work.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canary grantee profile",
                "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
              },
              {
                "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Part of the $38m package, not additional funding.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-canary-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Approximately $17m for METR",
            "sourceName": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Contributes policy and misuse evaluation work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-rand-canary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research collaborator",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Overall project funding announced in 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-audacious-canary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "The Audacious Project",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Catalyzed approximately $38m",
            "sourceName": "The Audacious Project",
            "targetName": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "date": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canary grantee profile",
            "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-rand",
      "label": "RAND Corporation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Policy research institution participating in Canary.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy research and evaluation"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-rand",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-rand",
        "name": "RAND Corporation",
        "role": "Policy research and evaluation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Policy research institution participating in Canary.",
        "why": "Policy research institution participating in Canary.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Policy research institution participating in Canary.",
        "structuralRole": "Connects policy research to model evaluation",
        "significance": "Canary joins policy work and technical assessment.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "RAND participates in Canary with METR, bringing policy and misuse-risk work into a collaboration with autonomy evaluators. The programme concerns assessments before model release.\n\nA separate May 2026 RAND paper argues for distinct evaluation practices for open-weight models. It supplies an actual proposal to examine when asking whether assessment regimes treat open and hosted systems differently.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current director of RAND Center on AI, Security, and Technology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-rand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sella Nevo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research leader",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "RAND Corporation",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authors propose tests adapted to open-model release.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-rand-open"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND proportional open-weight evaluation proposal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes evaluation proposal",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "RAND proportional open-weight evaluation proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-04; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "RAND publishes model-weights security research.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-rand-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes security framework",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Contributes policy and misuse evaluation work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-rand-canary"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research collaborator",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Researchers co-author.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-rand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Researchers co-author",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Policy research institution participating in Canary.",
          "structuralRole": "Connects policy research to model evaluation",
          "significance": "Canary joins policy work and technical assessment.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "RAND participates in Canary with METR, bringing policy and misuse-risk work into a collaboration with autonomy evaluators. The programme concerns assessments before model release.",
            "A separate May 2026 RAND paper argues for distinct evaluation practices for open-weight models. It supplies an actual proposal to examine when asking whether assessment regimes treat open and hosted systems differently.",
            "The connection is important because technical findings need interpretation before they become policy. A model’s measured performance, a scenario about misuse and a proposed release restriction are different propositions. RAND’s position in this programme places those questions near one another. The research can be assessed by examining the scenario, the assumptions and the proposed response separately. For the money map, Canary’s disclosed project funding is the relevant starting point; it does not automatically establish which donor financed a separate RAND publication or directed its recommendations."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
              "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
              "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-benton",
      "label": "Joe Benton",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Alignment researcher moving from a developer toward external evaluation.",
      "roles": [
        "Professional bridge"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-benton",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-benton",
        "name": "Joe Benton",
        "role": "Professional bridge",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Alignment researcher moving from a developer toward external evaluation.",
        "why": "Alignment researcher moving from a developer toward external evaluation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Joe Benton biography",
            "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Alignment researcher moving from a developer toward external evaluation.",
        "structuralRole": "Professional bridge",
        "significance": "His career links institution-building, internal oversight and external evaluation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Benton says he has left Anthropic and will soon join METR. His biography places him at the UK Frontier AI Taskforce earlier, then in Anthropic’s Scalable Oversight and Fellows research leadership. The METR appointment is prospective in the page inspected.\n\nExperience and working relationships can travel with a researcher. His career makes him a useful professional bridge to follow; the map keeps former roles and announced destination separate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Joe Benton biography",
                "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Biography says he will soon join; start unconfirmed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-benton-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Joe Benton biography",
                "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Plans to join",
            "sourceName": "Joe Benton",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Reports helping set up the UK Frontier AI Taskforce.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-benton-uk"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Joe Benton biography",
                "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Helped establish predecessor taskforce",
            "sourceName": "Joe Benton",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Also led Anthropic Fellows research.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-benton-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Joe Benton biography",
                "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former Scalable Oversight manager",
            "sourceName": "Joe Benton",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Joe Benton biography",
            "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Alignment researcher moving from a developer toward external evaluation.",
          "structuralRole": "Professional bridge",
          "significance": "His career links institution-building, internal oversight and external evaluation.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Benton says he has left Anthropic and will soon join METR. His biography places him at the UK Frontier AI Taskforce earlier, then in Anthropic’s Scalable Oversight and Fellows research leadership. The METR appointment is prospective in the page inspected.",
            "Experience and working relationships can travel with a researcher. His career makes him a useful professional bridge to follow; the map keeps former roles and announced destination separate.",
            "The institutional question is what changes when someone moves from internal oversight to external assessment. An internal researcher works within the developer’s management structure; an outside evaluator needs an agreement defining access and disclosure. METR’s published funding and access disclosures make those agreements the useful next record. Benton’s biography establishes his professional route, but does not tell us which systems he will assess, what information he will receive or what he will be permitted to publish."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Joe Benton biography",
              "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
            },
            {
              "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
              "url": "https://metr.org/about"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-arc",
      "label": "Alignment Research Center (ARC)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Incubated ARC Evals before its announced separation as METR.",
      "roles": [
        "Historical incubator"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-arc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-arc",
        "name": "Alignment Research Center (ARC)",
        "role": "Historical incubator",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Incubated ARC Evals before its announced separation as METR.",
        "why": "Incubated ARC Evals before its announced separation as METR.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Incubated ARC Evals before its announced separation as METR.",
        "structuralRole": "Historical incubator",
        "significance": "Incubation explains the connection; the public account describes institutional separation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The current spin-off account describes a standalone nonprofit. Its text says Christiano declined planned board and advisory involvement. This is a reading of the page now available, not an immutable snapshot of its original wording.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Announced standalone nonprofit separation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-arc-spinoff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Incubated before announced spin-off",
            "sourceName": "Alignment Research Center (ARC)",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Event or period: 2023-12-04; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "UK AI Security Institute",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Government AI research institute and METR partner.",
      "roles": [
        "Public research and evaluation"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "UK AISI",
        "UK AI Safety Institute"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-uk-aisi",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-uk-aisi",
        "name": "UK AI Security Institute",
        "role": "Public research and evaluation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Government AI research institute and METR partner.",
        "why": "Government AI research institute and METR partner.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "UK AISI",
          "UK AI Safety Institute"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
            "url": "https://metr.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Security Institute parliamentary answer",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/21384"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UK government research institute that tests advanced AI, commissions evaluation design and convenes safety-framework discussions.",
        "structuralRole": "Government evaluation buyer, collaborator and convenor",
        "significance": "Public measurement methods are partly built with external suppliers; contract approval and QA rights provide concrete points of public control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Government AI research institute and METR partner.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
                "url": "https://metr.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI Security Institute parliamentary answer",
                "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/21384"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A proposal to replace voluntary model access with a duty",
            "text": "The JCHR report recommends giving AISI statutory access to powerful AI models and their specifications. The report records the minister’s view that voluntary access was sufficient, so the proposed duty is a change the committee seeks, not a power already demonstrated. It also allows AISI and broader oversight functions to be combined.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCHR report, paragraphs 224–233 and formal minutes",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Committee announcement",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular’s commissioned contribution",
            "text": "The September 2024 Pattern Labs contract specifies attacks and mitigations for AISI evaluations and threat models, with weekly researcher contact. AISI later co-produced work on how evaluation budgets change measured cyber performance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              },
              {
                "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
                "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Buying the design of an evaluation suite",
            "text": "Contract 6492 commissions Pattern Labs to study priority capabilities, design and justify evaluations, and review other DSIT products. DSIT promises Inspect access and retains output approval. Independent QA and supporting-data access are specified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Convening the framework discussion",
            "text": "UK AISI and GovAI are named as organizers of the closed November 2024 safety-framework conference. Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy appear in its invitation-related disclosure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Schedule 20 commissions research into priority capabilities, test design, coverage justification and advice on other DSIT evaluations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-methods"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Shapes capability selection and evaluation design",
            "sourceName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Schedule 20 commissions technical inputs for AISI evaluations and threat models, with weekly researcher collaboration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-safeguards-tests"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supplies attacks for tests and threat models",
            "sourceName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AISI would review powerful models and receive specifications under statute.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends compulsory model access",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Redwood identifies UK AISI as partner on a published safety-case sketch.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
                "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Redwood Research",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joint AI control safety-case work",
            "sourceName": "Redwood Research",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "AISI identifies itself as a research organization within DSIT.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-dsit-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
                "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Houses government research institute",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "AISI reports joint cyber-evaluation research with Irregular.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-aisi-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
                "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AISI–Irregular study of evaluation budgets (2026)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-produces budget-scaling study",
            "sourceName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "targetName": "AISI–Irregular study of evaluation budgets (2026)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Reports helping set up the UK Frontier AI Taskforce.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-benton-uk"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Joe Benton biography",
                "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Joe Benton",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Helped establish predecessor taskforce",
            "sourceName": "Joe Benton",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The official response names UK AISI as an organizer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-aisi-organizes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as conference organizer",
            "sourceName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests",
            "heading": "A disclosed place in the framework discussion",
            "text": "An October 2024 government disclosure also names Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy in its response about invitations to the closed Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference. It identifies UK AISI and the Centre for the Governance of AI as organizers and gives a capacity of 90. The earlier response describes the primary audience as employees of labs making frontier-safety commitments, with relevant researchers also invited.",
            "matched": [
              "UK AISI"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4cf276006429ec02de11cda1adbe1f28fda6780a544c28cfaf9a07c5b1659daf"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
            "url": "https://metr.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Security Institute parliamentary answer",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/21384"
          },
          {
            "title": "Joe Benton biography",
            "url": "https://joejbenton.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
            "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
            "url": "https://naml.us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
          },
          {
            "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
            "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
          },
          {
            "title": "Committee announcement",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-eu-ai-office",
      "label": "European AI Office",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "Public institution obtaining technical assistance from METR.",
      "roles": [
        "Technical-assistance customer"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-eu-ai-office",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-eu-ai-office",
        "name": "European AI Office",
        "role": "Technical-assistance customer",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Public institution obtaining technical assistance from METR.",
        "why": "Public institution obtaining technical assistance from METR.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
            "url": "https://metr.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Public institution obtaining technical assistance from METR.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical-assistance customer",
        "significance": "Public institution obtaining technical assistance from METR.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Public institution obtaining technical assistance from METR.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
                "url": "https://metr.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Supports methods for assessing loss-of-control risks.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-eu-contract"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
                "url": "https://metr.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Technical-assistance contract",
            "sourceName": "European AI Office",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Epoch discloses this engagement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-eu"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Epoch AI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2026 technical consultations",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "European AI Office",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
            "url": "https://metr.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-rsp",
      "label": "Responsible Scaling Policies — framework",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Links continued development to measured capabilities and protective measures.",
      "roles": [
        "Evaluation-based scaling conditions"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-rsp",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-rsp",
        "name": "Responsible Scaling Policies — framework",
        "role": "Evaluation-based scaling conditions",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Links continued development to measured capabilities and protective measures.",
        "why": "Links continued development to measured capabilities and protective measures.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Links continued development to measured capabilities and protective measures.",
        "structuralRole": "Evaluation-based scaling conditions",
        "significance": "Links continued development to measured capabilities and protective measures.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Links continued development to measured capabilities and protective measures.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "ARC Evals, METR’s predecessor, presented voluntary commitments as a testbed for regulation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-rsp-origin"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Prototypes scaling policy",
            "sourceName": "METR",
            "targetName": "Responsible Scaling Policies — framework",
            "date": "Event or period: 2023-09-26; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-commitments",
      "label": "METR’s August 2026 funding commitments",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Funding commitments announced for research expansion.",
      "roles": [
        "Aggregate funding announcement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-commitments",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-commitments",
        "name": "METR’s August 2026 funding commitments",
        "role": "Aggregate funding announcement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Funding commitments announced for research expansion.",
        "why": "Funding commitments announced for research expansion.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "METR funding update",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Funding commitments announced for research expansion.",
        "structuralRole": "Aggregate funding announcement",
        "significance": "Funding commitments announced for research expansion.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Funding commitments announced for research expansion.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Raised over preceding six months; donor shares unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-commitments"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "METR funding update",
                "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Approximately $71m committed",
            "sourceName": "METR’s August 2026 funding commitments",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-08-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "METR funding update",
            "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-gates-anthropic",
      "label": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Joint programme combining funding, Claude resources and public-service applications.",
      "roles": [
        "Deployment and infrastructure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-gates-anthropic",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-gates-anthropic",
        "name": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
        "role": "Deployment and infrastructure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Joint programme combining funding, Claude resources and public-service applications.",
        "why": "Joint programme combining funding, Claude resources and public-service applications.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Making AI work for more people",
            "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Joint programme combining funding, Claude resources and public-service applications.",
        "structuralRole": "Deployment and infrastructure",
        "significance": "Standards, interfaces and continuing access are part of the programme’s practical power.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The announced $200m is a joint four-year package of grants, API credits and support. It is not a disclosed cash payment from Gates to Anthropic.\n\nNamed health-data work includes IHME and an IDM forecasting integration. Anthropic also describes work with health ministries and portable skills records. Access, reuse and transfer rights will depend on implementation agreements.\n\nPublic benefit and supplier dependence can develop together. The revealing records are project awards, data-use terms, credit-expiry conditions, interoperability requirements and switching costs.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Credits and technical support within the same package.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-anthropic-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joint programme partner",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Claude integration for accessible disease forecasts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-idm-integration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Plans forecasting integration",
            "sourceName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "targetName": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Work involving Global Burden of Disease study.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-ihme-integration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names health-data collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "targetName": "Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Combined $200m package over four years.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-gates-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gates Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joint programme partner",
            "sourceName": "Gates Foundation",
            "targetName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Making AI work for more people",
            "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure",
            "title": "Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Joint programme combining funding, Claude resources and public-service applications.",
          "structuralRole": "Deployment and infrastructure",
          "significance": "Standards, interfaces and continuing access are part of the programme’s practical power.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The announced $200m is a joint four-year package of grants, API credits and support. It is not a disclosed cash payment from Gates to Anthropic.",
            "Named health-data work includes IHME and an IDM forecasting integration. Anthropic also describes work with health ministries and portable skills records. Access, reuse and transfer rights will depend on implementation agreements.",
            "Public benefit and supplier dependence can develop together. The revealing records are project awards, data-use terms, credit-expiry conditions, interoperability requirements and switching costs.",
            "A useful way to inspect implementation is to follow one project through its whole life: who selects the application, who provides the data, who pays during the initial deployment, and who maintains it when the support period ends. That would show whether a public institution gains durable capability or an obligation to keep buying access from a particular provider."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Making AI work for more people",
              "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
            },
            {
              "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
              "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-idm",
      "label": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Gates research group named in a Claude forecasting integration.",
      "roles": [
        "Disease modelling"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-idm",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-idm",
        "name": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
        "role": "Disease modelling",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Gates research group named in a Claude forecasting integration.",
        "why": "Gates research group named in a Claude forecasting integration.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Gates research group named in a Claude forecasting integration.",
        "structuralRole": "Disease modelling",
        "significance": "Gates research group named in a Claude forecasting integration.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Gates research group named in a Claude forecasting integration.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Claude integration for accessible disease forecasts.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-idm-integration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Plans forecasting integration",
            "sourceName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "targetName": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "IDM identified as part of Gates Foundation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-idm-internal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gates Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Includes research group",
            "sourceName": "Gates Foundation",
            "targetName": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure",
            "title": "Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-ihme",
      "label": "Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Health-data research institute named in the partnership.",
      "roles": [
        "Public-health data research"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-ihme",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-ihme",
        "name": "Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation",
        "role": "Public-health data research",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Health-data research institute named in the partnership.",
        "why": "Health-data research institute named in the partnership.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Making AI work for more people",
            "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Health-data research institute named in the partnership.",
        "structuralRole": "Public-health data research",
        "significance": "Health-data research institute named in the partnership.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "Health-data research institute named in the partnership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Work involving Global Burden of Disease study.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-ihme-integration"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Making AI work for more people",
                "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names health-data collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "targetName": "Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Making AI work for more people",
            "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure",
            "title": "Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-open-evaluations",
      "label": "RAND proportional open-weight evaluation proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Tests adapted to foreseeable post-release model modifications.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed evaluation practice"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w41-open-evaluations",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-open-evaluations",
        "name": "RAND proportional open-weight evaluation proposal",
        "role": "Proposed evaluation practice",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Tests adapted to foreseeable post-release model modifications.",
        "why": "Tests adapted to foreseeable post-release model modifications.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Tests adapted to foreseeable post-release model modifications.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposes tests adapted to open-model release",
        "significance": "Assessment design can create different burdens for open and hosted systems.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "September 2026 update",
            "text": "The authors propose four approaches: testing without external safeguards, examining robustness of model safeguards, assessing capability amplification and approximating feasible worst-case misuse. They also say weaker models may warrant less exhaustive testing.\n\nApplying such a proposal to mandatory release decisions would raise questions about proportional costs, reproducibility and appeals. The paper discloses operating income and philanthropic support without allocating a named grant to it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-evaluators-money-and-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Authors propose tests adapted to open-model release.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w41-e-rand-open"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes evaluation proposal",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "RAND proportional open-weight evaluation proposal",
            "date": "Event or period: 2026-05-04; checked 14 September 2026"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
            "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Tests adapted to foreseeable post-release model modifications.",
          "structuralRole": "Proposes tests adapted to open-model release",
          "significance": "Assessment design can create different burdens for open and hosted systems.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The authors propose four approaches: testing without external safeguards, examining robustness of model safeguards, assessing capability amplification and approximating feasible worst-case misuse. They also say weaker models may warrant less exhaustive testing.",
            "Applying such a proposal to mandatory release decisions would raise questions about proportional costs, reproducibility and appeals. The paper discloses operating income and philanthropic support without allocating a named grant to it.",
            "The practical dispute is what counts as the system being evaluated. A hosted product includes controls maintained by its provider; released weights can be used in other configurations. This proposal tries to account for that difference. If authorities adopted such tests as release conditions, the important questions would include the modification budget, the assumed user’s resources, the reproducibility of results and the remedy for a disputed assessment. Those choices determine how much burden falls on a developer and whether a test measures realistic additional risk."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
              "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html"
            },
            {
              "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
              "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A cross-political statement calling for human control of AI, conditional limits on superintelligence and safeguards against concentrated power.",
      "roles": [
        "Shared advocacy principles"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w42-declaration",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-declaration",
        "name": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
        "role": "Shared advocacy principles",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A cross-political statement calling for human control of AI, conditional limits on superintelligence and safeguards against concentrated power.",
        "why": "A cross-political statement calling for human control of AI, conditional limits on superintelligence and safeguards against concentrated power.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
            "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A cross-political statement calling for human control of AI, conditional limits on superintelligence and safeguards against concentrated power.",
        "structuralRole": "A shared platform across otherwise divergent constituencies",
        "significance": "The declaration supplies specific policy demands around which a coalition can organize.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the platform asks for",
            "text": "The text links a conditional superintelligence prohibition and independent oversight to human agency and anti-monopoly commitments. Its institutional question is who will exercise those powers and how that authority will be constrained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
                "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-release"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A coalition before the September surge",
            "text": "FLI’s March announcement and the September event listing establish continuity across months. The declaration helps explain the infrastructure available when AI restrictions return to the headlines.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-builds-on"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The event listing explicitly connects the assembly to the earlier declaration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-builds-on"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Builds on declaration",
            "sourceName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-controlai-endorses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
                "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "ControlAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
            "sourceName": "ControlAI",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FLI published the coalition announcement on March 4.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-release"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces coalition declaration",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FLI’s March announcement already names Bannon.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-bannon-endorses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steve Bannon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as endorser",
            "sourceName": "Steve Bannon",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
            "url": "https://humanstatement.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
            "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly",
            "title": "The coalition was here before the surge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A Washington convening advertised for September 15, building on the earlier Pro-Human declaration.",
      "roles": [
        "Scheduled coalition event"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w42-assembly",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-assembly",
        "name": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
        "role": "Scheduled coalition event",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A Washington convening advertised for September 15, building on the earlier Pro-Human declaration.",
        "why": "A Washington convening advertised for September 15, building on the earlier Pro-Human declaration.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
            "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A Washington convening advertised for September 15, building on the earlier Pro-Human declaration.",
        "structuralRole": "A venue connecting advocacy, politicians and public audiences",
        "significance": "A named event turns general claims of alignment into a specific convening that can be followed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The current lineup and correction",
            "text": "Axios updated its report on September 14 to say Coxon and the organizers confirmed he would not attend. The organizer homepage still lists him; the linked programme does not. We have corrected the earlier reported-participation edge and retained its original observation. This is a change in the reported plan, with an unresolved website mismatch, not evidence of his motive. Sanders and Bannon remain scheduled on the organizer agenda.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Updated Axios account",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
              },
              {
                "title": "Organizer homepage",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Organizer agenda",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-scheduled",
              "w42-e-organizer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "What to follow after the event",
            "text": "The useful next evidence is the programme, recording, declarations and any commitments announced. Those records can show what participants actually support and whether the convening produces a joint legislative effort.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-builds-on"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A programme for a coalition",
            "text": "The organizer programme identifies FLI as presenter, assigns opening and closing sessions to its officers, and schedules Sanders and Bannon in adjacent afternoon slots. A later Frank McCourt session is labelled for a coalition announcement. Labor, faith, parents and creators also appear. The programme documents how the gathering is arranged; it does not tell us which commitments will be made or who paid for an appearance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Organizer programme",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-organizer",
              "w42-e-sanders-assembly",
              "w42-e-bannon-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Casar interview on event day confirms appearance and calls for an enforceable international AI agreement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-casar-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
                "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Greg Casar",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Spoke and advocated international controls",
            "sourceName": "Greg Casar",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Organizer programme schedules coalition announcements; dated issuer release establishes launch.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-assembly-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              },
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coalition launch announced same day",
            "sourceName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Toolkit supports common event messaging through an embedded sharing application.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-toolkit-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Promotes event",
            "sourceName": "Pro-Human Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The event listing explicitly connects the assembly to the earlier declaration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-builds-on"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Builds on declaration",
            "sourceName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Senate office reports Sanders addressed the gathering; CNN broadcasts a clip.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-sanders-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Prepared Remarks: Sanders: Regulating AI is as American as apple pie",
                "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/prepared-remarks-sanders-regulating-ai-is-as-american-as-apple-pie/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
                "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Bernie Sanders",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Addressed assembly",
            "sourceName": "Bernie Sanders",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CNN event-day transcript includes Bannon clip and identifies his appearance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-bannon-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
                "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Steve Bannon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Addressed assembly",
            "sourceName": "Steve Bannon",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FLI publishes the assembly programme, event recap and official recap video.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-organizer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Assembly event recap",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/recap/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Recap | The Pro-Human Assembly, September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffsR2KrIS4k"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Presents September 15 assembly",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Public listing schedules the assembly in Washington.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-scheduled"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
                "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advertises September 15 convening",
            "sourceName": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The September 15 Pro-Human Assembly now has a concrete institutional outcome: the Pro-Human AI Coalition. Project Liberty's launch statement identifies three organizational co-founders—Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact—and names Mila and Omidyar Network in its steering structure. The coalition is described as an independent nonprofit. Launch announcement .",
            "matched": [
              "Pro-Human Assembly"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "06b8c7fea6d4e98a69126b09f14aee4e0ab3d2224eb94f479ee5165767ed0bae"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
            "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer homepage",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
          },
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Prepared Remarks: Sanders: Regulating AI is as American as apple pie",
            "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/prepared-remarks-sanders-regulating-ai-is-as-american-as-apple-pie/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
            "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly event recap",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/recap/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Recap | The Pro-Human Assembly, September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffsR2KrIS4k"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly",
            "title": "The coalition was here before the surge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "The Pro-Human Assembly is a Washington event scheduled for September 15,2026, presented by the Future of Life Institute. Its agenda combines elected officials, labor, faith, parents and creators around AI governance.",
          "structuralRole": "A scheduled venue connecting advocacy constituencies",
          "significance": "The programme makes the convening structure inspectable while preserving the difference between planned appearances and actual commitments.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The assembly follows the Pro-Human AI Declaration announced in March. That earlier statement already included Steve Bannon among its endorsers. The September programme therefore extends an established coalition platform; it cannot by itself establish how the latest wave of public warnings was organized or funded.",
            "FLI is named as presenter, and its officers open and close the programme. Sanders and Bannon have consecutive afternoon slots. A Frank McCourt session is labelled for a coalition announcement. These arrangements establish the organizer’s published plan, including opportunities to align constituencies; they do not establish what participants will say, agree to or deliver.",
            "Axios updated its report on September 14 to say Coxon and the organizers confirmed he would not attend. The organizer homepage still lists him; the linked programme does not. We have corrected the earlier reported-participation edge and retained its original observation. This is a change in the reported plan, with an unresolved website mismatch, not evidence of his motive.",
            "The next evidence is unusually obtainable: the actual speeches, recording, final programme and any joint text or sponsor disclosures. Those records can distinguish a broad public convening from a coordinated legislative effort and explain which participants can turn a shared principle into a binding obligation."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "FLI March declaration announcement",
              "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Organizer agenda",
              "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Updated Axios account",
              "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
            },
            {
              "title": "Organizer homepage",
              "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-bannon",
      "label": "Steve Bannon",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "War Room host and former Trump adviser; named as a declaration endorser in March and reported as a planned September assembly participant.",
      "roles": [
        "Conservative media and political bridge"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w42-bannon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-bannon",
        "name": "Steve Bannon",
        "role": "Conservative media and political bridge",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "War Room host and former Trump adviser; named as a declaration endorser in March and reported as a planned September assembly participant.",
        "why": "War Room host and former Trump adviser; named as a declaration endorser in March and reported as a planned September assembly participant.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "War Room host and former Trump adviser; named as a declaration endorser in March and reported as a planned September assembly participant.",
        "structuralRole": "A bridge into conservative political media",
        "significance": "His documented endorsement makes the coalition’s cross-political composition concrete.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Two distinct records",
            "text": "Bannon appears in the March declaration announcement. His September assembly role is separately reported by Axios. Endorsement and planned participation are the relationships mapped here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-bannon-endorses",
              "w42-e-bannon-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "CNN event-day transcript includes Bannon clip and identifies his appearance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-bannon-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
                "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Addressed assembly",
            "sourceName": "Steve Bannon",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "FLI’s March announcement already names Bannon.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-bannon-endorses"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
                "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as endorser",
            "sourceName": "Steve Bannon",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
            "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly",
            "title": "The coalition was here before the surge"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-google-canada",
      "label": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "An announced Canadian expansion of Google’s age-estimation system, using account signals to apply protections for under-18 users.",
      "roles": [
        "Platform age-based access controls"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w42-google-canada",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-google-canada",
        "name": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
        "role": "Platform age-based access controls",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An announced Canadian expansion of Google’s age-estimation system, using account signals to apply protections for under-18 users.",
        "why": "An announced Canadian expansion of Google’s age-estimation system, using account signals to apply protections for under-18 users.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
            "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age assurance measures in the United States",
            "url": "https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "google-canada-age-assurance"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An announced Canadian expansion of Google’s age-estimation system, using account signals to apply protections for under-18 users.",
        "structuralRole": "An age judgment changes available services",
        "significance": "The consequential point is how an inferred age becomes an access restriction, with correction options controlled by the platform.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What is announced",
            "text": "Google says its Canadian expansion will begin gradually in coming days. It is an extension of an earlier US approach.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
                "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Age assurance measures in the United States",
                "url": "https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-google-announces"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "google-canada-age-assurance"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Correction and access",
            "text": "The model uses account signals. Adults wrongly classified can use correction methods including ID or a selfie; their actual success was not tested here.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
                "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-google-method"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "google-canada-age-assurance"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Existing account signals classify users for age-based protections.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-google-method"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
                "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Age assurance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Uses account-based age estimation",
            "sourceName": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
            "targetName": "Age assurance",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Google announces gradual rollout beginning in coming days.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w42-e-google-announces"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
                "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Google",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces Canadian rollout",
            "sourceName": "Google",
            "targetName": "Google Canada age-assurance rollout",
            "date": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
            "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Age assurance measures in the United States",
            "url": "https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "google-canada-age-assurance",
            "title": "Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
      "label": "Australia: stronger minimum-age enforcement",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Australia's 2026 amendment expands eSafety evidence-gathering powers and penalties; it commenced on 12 September.",
      "roles": [
        "Operative statutory enforcement powers"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
        "name": "Australia: stronger minimum-age enforcement",
        "role": "Operative statutory enforcement powers",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Australia's 2026 amendment expands eSafety evidence-gathering powers and penalties; it commenced on 12 September.",
        "why": "The amendment changes how eSafety can obtain compliance evidence and sanction failures.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-au-enforcement-in-force"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Australia's 2026 amendment expands eSafety evidence-gathering powers and penalties; it commenced on 12 September.",
        "structuralRole": "Statutory access to compliance evidence",
        "significance": "The regulator can examine evidence behind age checks, with safeguards that constrain the process.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Operative powers and their limits",
            "text": "The enacted amendment commenced September 12. Written information demands and private examinations are separate powers; advisers, records and defined source/witness protections accompany examinations. Particular uses of the powers remain unverified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-au-e-information",
              "w43-au-e-examination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-au-enforcement-in-force"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "New Division 4A permits summons, questions and documents in private examinations, with an adviser and defined witness and source protections.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-au-e-examination"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Grants examination powers with safeguards",
            "sourceName": "Australia: stronger minimum-age enforcement",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "Newly checked 14 September 2026; assent 11 September, commencement 12 September."
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Amended section 63G permits written demands to persons holding relevant compliance information, extending beyond platform operators.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-au-e-information"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
                "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Expands compulsory information and document access",
            "sourceName": "Australia: stronger minimum-age enforcement",
            "targetName": "Australian eSafety Commissioner",
            "date": "Newly checked 14 September 2026; assent 11 September, commencement 12 September."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-au-enforcement-in-force",
            "title": "Australia can now compel more of the evidence behind age checks"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-clarity",
      "label": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A proposed substitute adds conditional stablecoin-reward restrictions and constrained state ethics-enforcement routes. It has not become law.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed financial-market legislation"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-fin-clarity",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-clarity",
        "name": "CLARITY Act — September14 proposed substitute",
        "role": "Proposed financial-market legislation",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A proposed substitute adds conditional stablecoin-reward restrictions and constrained state ethics-enforcement routes. It has not become law.",
        "why": "A proposed substitute adds conditional stablecoin-reward restrictions and constrained state ethics-enforcement routes. It has not become law.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lummis, Boozman, Scott release final CLARITY Act draft",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "On September 15 the Senate rejected cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633, 49–50. Tillis entered reconsideration. This was not final-passage defeat; the September 14 substitute and the powers it describes remain proposals.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed legislative authority",
        "significance": "Separate announced, proposed and exercised authority; inspect the governing record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Record and limits",
            "text": "A proposed substitute adds conditional stablecoin-reward restrictions and constrained state ethics-enforcement routes. It has not become law.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lummis, Boozman, Scott release final CLARITY Act draft",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-treasury",
              "w43-fin-e-state"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The two qualified intervention routes",
            "text": "The proposed stablecoin circuit-breaker turns on a time-limited Treasury determination, consultation and rulemaking. Certain state ethics actions would instead follow a specified federal court route, with ethics-office exceptions. Reading the actual triggers and defendants is necessary to understand who could use each proposed power.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lummis, Boozman, Scott release final CLARITY Act draft",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/"
              },
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-treasury",
              "w43-fin-e-state"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 20 update: CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate",
            "text": "On September 15 the Senate rejected cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633, 49–50. Tillis entered reconsideration. This was not final-passage defeat; the September 14 substitute and the powers it describes remain proposals.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
                "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
                "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w51-clarity-procedural-vote"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Section 10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury finding within 18 months of enactment of substantial detrimental deposit transfers from banks with assets below $10 billion, specifically tied to regulated activities; rules follow notice/comment and OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve consultation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-treasury"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "What's new in the final CLARITY Act text",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "US Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would confer conditional rulemaking power",
            "sourceName": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
            "targetName": "US Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention",
            "date": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Proposed 5 USC 13153(d) separates state actions against the US Attorney General over covered-official violations from direct actions against intermediaries over prohibited listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-state"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would create constrained state action",
            "sourceName": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
            "targetName": "CLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route",
            "date": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lummis, Boozman, Scott release final CLARITY Act draft",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "What's new in the final CLARITY Act text",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
            "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
            "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-fin-clarity-remedies",
            "title": "CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-20"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-treasury-role",
      "label": "US Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "The proposed rulemaking role turns on a written finding about harmful transfers from community-bank deposits to payment stablecoins.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed regulatory decision right"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-fin-treasury-role",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-treasury-role",
        "name": "US Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention",
        "role": "Proposed regulatory decision right",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The proposed rulemaking role turns on a written finding about harmful transfers from community-bank deposits to payment stablecoins.",
        "why": "The proposed rulemaking role turns on a written finding about harmful transfers from community-bank deposits to payment stablecoins.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The proposed rulemaking role turns on a written finding about harmful transfers from community-bank deposits to payment stablecoins.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed regulatory decision right",
        "significance": "The draft allocates a specific conditional decision or enforcement right; passage and implementation remain separate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Record and limits",
            "text": "The proposed section 10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury determination within 18 months after enactment about substantial detrimental transfers from qualifying community-bank deposits to payment stablecoins. It also requires a necessity finding, consultation with the OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve, and notice-and-comment rulemaking. The time limit applies to the determination; it is not evidence that every resulting rule expires then. No power is enacted by publication of this draft.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-treasury"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 20 update: CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate",
            "text": "The draft's Treasury role remains proposed after the September 15 failed cloture vote on proceeding to H.R. 3633. The vote does not establish enactment or repeal of these powers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
                "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
                "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w51-clarity-procedural-vote"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Section 10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury finding within 18 months of enactment of substantial detrimental deposit transfers from banks with assets below $10 billion, specifically tied to regulated activities; rules follow notice/comment and OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve consultation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-treasury"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "What's new in the final CLARITY Act text",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would confer conditional rulemaking power",
            "sourceName": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
            "targetName": "US Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention",
            "date": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "What's new in the final CLARITY Act text",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
            "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
            "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-fin-clarity-remedies",
            "title": "CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-20"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-state-ethics-route",
      "label": "CLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "For certain official-interest violations, the draft lets a state attorney general seek relief against the US Attorney General, subject to special procedure and ethics-office exceptions.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed enforcement route"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-fin-state-ethics-route",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-state-ethics-route",
        "name": "CLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route",
        "role": "Proposed enforcement route",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "For certain official-interest violations, the draft lets a state attorney general seek relief against the US Attorney General, subject to special procedure and ethics-office exceptions.",
        "why": "For certain official-interest violations, the draft lets a state attorney general seek relief against the US Attorney General, subject to special procedure and ethics-office exceptions.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "For certain official-interest violations, the draft lets a state attorney general seek relief against the US Attorney General, subject to special procedure and ethics-office exceptions.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed enforcement route",
        "significance": "The draft allocates a specific conditional decision or enforcement right; passage and implementation remain separate.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Record and limits",
            "text": "For specified issuer, sponsor or financial-interest violations, a state attorney general would seek injunctive relief against the US Attorney General through district-court findings and an en-banc appellate judgment. Certain supervising ethics-office opinions or notices can bar that route. A distinct direct action concerns intermediary listing violations. These procedural gates qualify the sponsors’ broader outside-enforcement claim; the draft has not become law.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-state"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-fin-clarity-remedies"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 20 update: CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate",
            "text": "The draft's state-ethics route remains proposed after the September 15 failed cloture vote on proceeding to H.R. 3633. The vote does not establish enactment or repeal of these powers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
                "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
                "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
                "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w51-clarity-procedural-vote"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Proposed 5 USC 13153(d) separates state actions against the US Attorney General over covered-official violations from direct actions against intermediaries over prohibited listing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-state"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
                "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Would create constrained state action",
            "sourceName": "CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute",
            "targetName": "CLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route",
            "date": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
            "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
            "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
            "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
            "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-fin-clarity-remedies",
            "title": "CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-20"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
      "label": "PayPal US dispute-resolution terms — September 14",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "PayPal's dated US agreement changes the arbitration provider and adds staged mass-arbitration procedures, with stated application to earlier disputes.",
      "roles": [
        "Contractual remedy procedure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
        "name": "PayPal US dispute-resolution terms — September14",
        "role": "Contractual remedy procedure",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "PayPal's dated US agreement changes the arbitration provider and adds staged mass-arbitration procedures, with stated application to earlier disputes.",
        "why": "PayPal's dated US agreement changes the arbitration provider and adds staged mass-arbitration procedures, with stated application to earlier disputes.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September14",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September14,2026",
            "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-fin-paypal-dispute"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "PayPal's dated US agreement changes the arbitration provider and adds staged mass-arbitration procedures, with stated application to earlier disputes.",
        "structuralRole": "Contractual remedy procedure",
        "significance": "The terms shape how a user can pursue a remedy against a payment intermediary.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Record and limits",
            "text": "The US agreement reaches its stated September 14 effective date. JAMS replaces AAA, and coordinated similar disputes face staged arbitration, holdbacks and mediation, with tolling and later routes to court or further arbitration. The agreement claims application to earlier disputes. Its initial-account opt-out and small-claims provisions remain; this does not reopen a universal opt-out today. These are contractual terms, not a finding of judicial enforceability or measured delay.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September 14",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September 14,2026",
                "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-fin-paypal-dispute"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The June 29 notice identifies September 14 commencement; the linked dated agreement uses JAMS and staged mass arbitration, while claiming to supersede prior arbitration agreements for earlier disputes.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-fin-e-paypal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September 14",
                "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
              },
              {
                "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September 14,2026",
                "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Sets US dispute terms effective September 14",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "PayPal US dispute-resolution terms — September 14",
            "date": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September14",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September14,2026",
            "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
            "title": "PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-jchr",
      "label": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "The UK parliamentary committee that adopted the AI report.",
      "roles": [
        "Parliamentary scrutiny"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "JCHR"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-ai-jchr",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-jchr",
        "name": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
        "role": "Parliamentary scrutiny",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The UK parliamentary committee that adopted the AI report.",
        "why": "Its recommendations specify proposed oversight powers.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "JCHR"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The UK parliamentary committee that adopted the AI report.",
        "structuralRole": "Parliamentary scrutiny",
        "significance": "Its recommendations specify proposed oversight powers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A recommendation, not a regulator",
            "text": "The joint parliamentary committee adopted this report on September 9 and published it on September 14. Its role is scrutiny and recommendation: adoption by the committee neither passes an AI Bill nor appoints a regulator. Its report supplies a concrete institutional proposal against which the government’s response can be compared.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCHR report, paragraphs 224–233 and formal minutes",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Committee announcement",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-adopted",
              "w43-ai-e-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Formal minutes record the committee's adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-adopted"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adopts committee report",
            "sourceName": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "targetName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Publication date on the report's cover.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wide-ranging AI Bill needed to address severe human rights risks posed by AI",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "targetName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w43-ai-uk-oversight",
            "title": "Who could stop a model release? A UK committee's proposal",
            "heading": "Who could stop a model release?",
            "text": "The Joint Committee on Human Rights report , adopted September 9 and published September 14, proposes statutory oversight with testing, sanction and remedy powers. Launch blocking or withdrawal would turn on an unacceptable risk to human rights; AISI would advise and the oversight body would decide. It also recommends mandatory access to powerful models for the AI Security Institute. These are recommendations to government, not an enacted law.",
            "matched": [
              "Joint Committee on Human Rights"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0c0716d7de00bd748df3d46bd008d431b729541776468a5104228677bc8f605d"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wide-ranging AI Bill needed to address severe human rights risks posed by AI",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-ai-uk-oversight",
            "title": "Who could stop a model release? A UK committee's proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-report",
      "label": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A report adopted September 9 and published September 14, recommending an AI Bill.",
      "roles": [
        "Committee recommendations"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-ai-report",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-report",
        "name": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
        "role": "Committee recommendations",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A report adopted September 9 and published September 14, recommending an AI Bill.",
        "why": "Proposals are distinct from enacted authority.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A report adopted September 9 and published September 14, recommending an AI Bill.",
        "structuralRole": "Committee recommendations",
        "significance": "Proposals are distinct from enacted authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Where the proposal places decision rights",
            "text": "Paragraphs 226–227 recommend testing, sanctions and remedies, with launch blocking or withdrawal where systems pose an unacceptable risk to human rights. Paragraphs 231–233 propose compulsory access to powerful models and specifications for AISI: it would advise the oversight body, which would make intervention decisions. These are proposed powers, with legislation still to come. An existing body could expand and the functions could be combined.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCHR report, paragraphs 224–233 and formal minutes",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Committee announcement",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-oversight",
              "w43-ai-e-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-oversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends statutory enforcement powers",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "targetName": "Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "AISI would review powerful models and receive specifications under statute.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends compulsory model access",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Formal minutes record the committee's adoption.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-adopted"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Adopts committee report",
            "sourceName": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "targetName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Publication date on the report's cover.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-published"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Wide-ranging AI Bill needed to address severe human rights risks posed by AI",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes recommendations",
            "sourceName": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "targetName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Wide-ranging AI Bill needed to address severe human rights risks posed by AI",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-ai-uk-oversight",
            "title": "Who could stop a model release? A UK committee's proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-oversight-proposal",
      "label": "Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "A proposed independent body with enforcement and remedy powers; not an established regulator.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed statutory authority"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w43-ai-oversight-proposal",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-oversight-proposal",
        "name": "Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK",
        "role": "Proposed statutory authority",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A proposed independent body with enforcement and remedy powers; not an established regulator.",
        "why": "Its governing legislation and institutional design remain undecided.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A proposed independent body with enforcement and remedy powers; not an established regulator.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed statutory authority",
        "significance": "Its governing legislation and institutional design remain undecided.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The enforcement and accountability questions",
            "text": "The proposed statutory body would decide on launch blocking or withdrawal where an unacceptable human-rights risk is established, informed by AISI advice. It would also have testing, sanction and remedy powers. The report does not enact an appointment process, appeal route or final allocation of functions. An existing body could expand. The government response and bill clauses are needed to determine who would actually decide and how a decision could be challenged.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "JCHR report, paragraphs 224–233 and formal minutes",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Committee announcement",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-oversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w43-ai-uk-oversight"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w43-ai-e-oversight"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
                "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends statutory enforcement powers",
            "sourceName": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026",
            "targetName": "Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Committee announcement",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w43-ai-uk-oversight",
            "title": "Who could stop a model release? A UK committee's proposal"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-svangel",
      "label": "SV Angel",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The venture firm has announced an expanded policy-access role through Project Blueprint.",
      "roles": [
        "Capital and policy-access intermediary"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-svangel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-svangel",
        "name": "SV Angel",
        "role": "Capital and policy-access intermediary",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The venture firm has announced an expanded policy-access role through Project Blueprint.",
        "why": "Its investment relationships supply a constituency; the new mandate names the route toward policymakers.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-blueprint-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The venture firm has announced an expanded policy-access role through Project Blueprint.",
        "structuralRole": "Capital and policy-access intermediary",
        "significance": "Its investment relationships supply a constituency; the new mandate names the route toward policymakers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "SV Angel says its new partner will connect portfolio founders with policymakers in Washington and state capitals. This is a concrete professional-access mandate, not a guarantee that any official will accept a proposal. The public initiative lists AI risk, competition, workforce and energy policy as targets. The inspected records provide no project budget, ownership terms or achieved legislative result.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-appointment",
              "w44-net-e-initiative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-blueprint-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The firm presents Project Blueprint as an organized route connecting founders with policymakers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-initiative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              },
              {
                "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Launches internal AI policy initiative",
            "sourceName": "SV Angel",
            "targetName": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "SV Angel names Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-appointment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jay Carney",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces partner and policy leadership appointment",
            "sourceName": "SV Angel",
            "targetName": "Jay Carney",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "heading": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "text": "SV Angel’s September 14 announcement puts Jay Carney in charge of public policy and communications and launches Project Blueprint. The named task is to connect portfolio founders with policymakers. A venture firm’s network is being offered as a policy service, with a specific person assigned to run it.",
            "matched": [
              "SV Angel"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9daafb9812ab2790a40f6307c7db4efb6ce76e09bf912957e63bceff3b2d4c97"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-carney",
      "label": "Jay Carney",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "SV Angel announced Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy and communications intermediary"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-carney",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-carney",
        "name": "Jay Carney",
        "role": "Policy and communications intermediary",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "SV Angel announced Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
        "why": "The appointment puts a named person in charge of the firm’s declared connection-building effort.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-blueprint-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "SV Angel announced Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy and communications intermediary",
        "significance": "The appointment puts a named person in charge of the firm’s declared connection-building effort.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "The firm assigns Carney a role connecting portfolio founders with policymakers and leading Project Blueprint. Its biography describes earlier Amazon, Airbnb and White House communications work. These professional roles explain the advertised access proposition; they do not establish current government authority, paid official access or influence over a particular vote. Compensation and internal approval rights were not disclosed in the inspected release.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-appointment",
              "w44-net-e-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-blueprint-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Carney’s stated work includes connecting portfolio founders and lawmakers through the initiative.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Assigned to lead policy engagement",
            "sourceName": "Jay Carney",
            "targetName": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "SV Angel names Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-appointment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SV Angel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces partner and policy leadership appointment",
            "sourceName": "SV Angel",
            "targetName": "Jay Carney",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "heading": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "text": "SV Angel’s September 14 announcement puts Jay Carney in charge of public policy and communications and launches Project Blueprint. The named task is to connect portfolio founders with policymakers. A venture firm’s network is being offered as a policy service, with a specific person assigned to run it.",
            "matched": [
              "Jay Carney",
              "Carney"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9daafb9812ab2790a40f6307c7db4efb6ce76e09bf912957e63bceff3b2d4c97"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "heading": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "text": "The pages do not disclose a project budget, binding membership rules or achieved legislative outcome. Carney’s professional biography is relevant to the advertised service but does not prove the effectiveness of each relationship. The dated news index establishes a September 14 announcement, not its hour. This is newly acquired material; it is not presented as a proven post-noon launch.",
            "matched": [
              "Carney"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "41a243e5ed0406318a4afc7d0ef4f9a59f6a423a5615a19e59829e46f5ac5886"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-blueprint",
      "label": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "An SV Angel initiative to connect founders and lawmakers around AI policy.",
      "roles": [
        "Organized policy engagement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-blueprint",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-blueprint",
        "name": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
        "role": "Organized policy engagement",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An SV Angel initiative to connect founders and lawmakers around AI policy.",
        "why": "The initiative formalizes a route from portfolio companies to policy discussion without itself creating public authority.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-blueprint-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An SV Angel initiative to connect founders and lawmakers around AI policy.",
        "structuralRole": "Organized policy engagement",
        "significance": "The initiative formalizes a route from portfolio companies to policy discussion without itself creating public authority.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "The September 14 announcement defines four policy areas: AI risks, international competition, public benefits and energy infrastructure. SV Angel retains the initiative inside the firm, with Carney leading its policy work. This is an announced convening and advocacy function. The public pages do not disclose a membership charter, separate board, project budget, legislative text adopted by officials or a binding government commitment.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              },
              {
                "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-initiative",
              "w44-net-e-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-blueprint-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Carney’s stated work includes connecting portfolio founders and lawmakers through the initiative.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jay Carney",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Assigned to lead policy engagement",
            "sourceName": "Jay Carney",
            "targetName": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The firm presents Project Blueprint as an organized route connecting founders with policymakers.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-initiative"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
              },
              {
                "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
              },
              {
                "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
                "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "SV Angel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Launches internal AI policy initiative",
            "sourceName": "SV Angel",
            "targetName": "Project Blueprint — SV Angel",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "heading": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
            "text": "SV Angel’s September 14 announcement puts Jay Carney in charge of public policy and communications and launches Project Blueprint. The named task is to connect portfolio founders with policymakers. A venture firm’s network is being offered as a policy service, with a specific person assigned to run it.",
            "matched": [
              "Project Blueprint"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9daafb9812ab2790a40f6307c7db4efb6ce76e09bf912957e63bceff3b2d4c97"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
            "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
            "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "An SV Angel initiative to connect founders and lawmakers around AI policy.",
          "structuralRole": "Organized policy engagement",
          "significance": "The initiative formalizes a route from portfolio companies to policy discussion without itself creating public authority.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "SV Angel’s September 14 announcement puts Jay Carney in charge of public policy and communications and launches Project Blueprint. The named task is to connect portfolio founders with policymakers. A venture firm’s network is being offered as a policy service, with a specific person assigned to run it.",
            "The initiative page identifies AI risk, international competition, workforce and economic effects, and energy infrastructure as the areas of engagement. That makes the intended route inspectable: investment relationships supply a constituency; professional intermediaries seek access; officials retain public decision rights. Calling itself a bridge is the firm’s proposition, not evidence that officials have delegated those rights.",
            "The pages do not disclose a project budget, binding membership rules or achieved legislative outcome. Carney’s professional biography is relevant to the advertised service but does not prove the effectiveness of each relationship. The dated news index establishes a September 14 announcement, not its hour. This is newly acquired material; it is not presented as a proven post-noon launch.",
            "Actual meeting records, lobbying disclosures, submitted text and later official decisions could show what moved through this route. Until then, the supported relationship is organized access-seeking, not policy capture."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
              "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel"
            },
            {
              "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
              "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint"
            },
            {
              "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
              "url": "https://svangel.com/news"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-ain",
      "label": "American Innovators Network",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An advocacy network whose original launch names a16z and other startup-sector partners.",
      "roles": [
        "Startup-policy coalition"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-ain",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-ain",
        "name": "American Innovators Network",
        "role": "Startup-policy coalition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An advocacy network whose original launch names a16z and other startup-sector partners.",
        "why": "Named partners make the commercial constituency visible; representation claims still need to be distinguished from control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
            "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-caucus-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An advocacy network whose original launch names a16z and other startup-sector partners.",
        "structuralRole": "Startup-policy coalition",
        "significance": "Named partners make the commercial constituency visible; representation claims still need to be distinguished from control.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "AIN’s launch page names Andreessen Horowitz, Anyscale, Exowatt, Sourcegraph and Y Combinator as partners, and Vanessa Day as executive director. Its stated purpose is advocacy for startups and innovation. Axios now reports planned visits to lawmakers by a dozen affiliated companies. Partnership does not disclose contributions, appointment powers or control over the newly reported congressional caucus. The original launch is historical context, not an event first occurring this evening.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
                "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-ain-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-caucus-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "AIN’s original launch identifies Andreessen Horowitz among its partners.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-ain-partner"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
                "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "a16z Capital Management",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as a launch partner",
            "sourceName": "a16z Capital Management",
            "targetName": "American Innovators Network",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "heading": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "text": "Axios reports that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. Punchbowl’s public excerpt describes the same organizing development.",
            "matched": [
              "American Innovators Network"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aa1c48bc59f4e034144ba0652d993519062dfcae08a5d3c03081ca08e1bd7252"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
            "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "An advocacy network whose original launch names a16z and other startup-sector partners.",
          "structuralRole": "Startup-policy coalition",
          "significance": "Named partners make the commercial constituency visible; representation claims still need to be distinguished from control.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Axios reports that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. Punchbowl’s public excerpt describes the same organizing development.",
            "AIN is not newly created by this caucus story. Its original launch page names a16z, Anyscale, Exowatt, Sourcegraph and Y Combinator as partners. That older record gives the advocacy label a visible commercial constituency. It does not disclose partner payments or appointment powers, and it does not make the congressional caucus an AIN subsidiary.",
            "The public map therefore connects the named caucus leaders to their reported venue and a16z to its documented AIN partnership. It deliberately does not draw an AIN-to-caucus control edge from concurrent activity. A shared issue and proximity on the calendar are not a governance instrument.",
            "The next useful evidence is a caucus charter or roster, the actual visit record, submitted proposals and any subsequent legislative action. Those records could show whether access became agenda-setting, a specific amendment or a binding rule."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
              "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
              "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-caucus",
      "label": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "A reported bipartisan House caucus focused on small-business AI, led by Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam.",
      "roles": [
        "Reported legislative convening venue"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-caucus",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-caucus",
        "name": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
        "role": "Reported legislative convening venue",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "A reported bipartisan House caucus focused on small-business AI, led by Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam.",
        "why": "A caucus can organize attention and contacts; its formation does not pass legislation or transfer formal committee powers.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          },
          {
            "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
            "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-caucus-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A reported bipartisan House caucus focused on small-business AI, led by Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported legislative convening venue",
        "significance": "A caucus can organize attention and contacts; its formation does not pass legislation or transfer formal committee powers.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "Axios reports the caucus launch from a release provided to it, naming Fry and Subramanyam as leaders. Punchbowl’s public excerpt describes the small- and medium-sized AI business focus. The underlying release, formal membership list, rules and any caucus-authored legislation were not acquired. Planned AIN-affiliated company visits are a separate reported activity; no record inspected makes AIN the caucus owner or funder.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-fry-leads",
              "w44-net-e-sub-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-caucus-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios and Punchbowl name Fry as a leader alongside Subramanyam.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-fry-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Russell Fry",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported caucus leader",
            "sourceName": "Russell Fry",
            "targetName": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios and Punchbowl name Subramanyam as a leader alongside Fry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-sub-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Suhas Subramanyam",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported caucus leader",
            "sourceName": "Suhas Subramanyam",
            "targetName": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "heading": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "text": "Axios reports that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. Punchbowl’s public excerpt describes the same organizing development.",
            "matched": [
              "Innovators Caucus"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aa1c48bc59f4e034144ba0652d993519062dfcae08a5d3c03081ca08e1bd7252"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          },
          {
            "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
            "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-fry",
      "label": "Russell Fry",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "The South Carolina Republican is reported as a leader of the new Innovators Caucus.",
      "roles": [
        "Reported caucus co-leader"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-fry",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-fry",
        "name": "Russell Fry",
        "role": "Reported caucus co-leader",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The South Carolina Republican is reported as a leader of the new Innovators Caucus.",
        "why": "The named role identifies a congressional point of contact, not an exclusive policy decision-maker.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          },
          {
            "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
            "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-caucus-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The South Carolina Republican is reported as a leader of the new Innovators Caucus.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported caucus co-leader",
        "significance": "The named role identifies a congressional point of contact, not an exclusive policy decision-maker.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "Two public news accounts name Fry alongside Virginia Democrat Suhas Subramanyam in the new caucus. This addition concerns that specific reported organizing role. It does not assign Fry authority to bind Congress, establish his agreement with every AIN position, or claim that any contemplated meeting has already occurred.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-fry-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-caucus-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios and Punchbowl name Fry as a leader alongside Subramanyam.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-fry-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported caucus leader",
            "sourceName": "Russell Fry",
            "targetName": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "heading": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "text": "Axios reports that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. Punchbowl’s public excerpt describes the same organizing development.",
            "matched": [
              "Russell Fry"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aa1c48bc59f4e034144ba0652d993519062dfcae08a5d3c03081ca08e1bd7252"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          },
          {
            "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
            "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-subramanyam",
      "label": "Suhas Subramanyam",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "The Virginia Democrat is reported as a leader of the new Innovators Caucus.",
      "roles": [
        "Reported caucus co-leader"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-net-subramanyam",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-subramanyam",
        "name": "Suhas Subramanyam",
        "role": "Reported caucus co-leader",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The Virginia Democrat is reported as a leader of the new Innovators Caucus.",
        "why": "The paired leadership is a specific bipartisan organizing link, not proof of agreement on final legislation.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          },
          {
            "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
            "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-net-caucus-note"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Virginia Democrat is reported as a leader of the new Innovators Caucus.",
        "structuralRole": "Reported caucus co-leader",
        "significance": "The paired leadership is a specific bipartisan organizing link, not proof of agreement on final legislation.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role, mechanism and limits",
            "text": "Axios and Punchbowl’s public excerpt identify Subramanyam with Russell Fry as leaders of the new small-business AI caucus. The role is reported from an announcement rather than an acquired caucus charter. Its future influence would need to be traced through actual proposals, hearings, votes or other documented actions, not inferred from a launch or from concurrent visits by a private advocacy network.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-sub-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-net-caucus-note"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Axios and Punchbowl name Subramanyam as a leader alongside Fry.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-net-e-sub-leads"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
                "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
              },
              {
                "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
                "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported caucus leader",
            "sourceName": "Suhas Subramanyam",
            "targetName": "Innovators Caucus — US House",
            "date": "2026-09-14"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "heading": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
            "text": "Axios reports that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. Punchbowl’s public excerpt describes the same organizing development.",
            "matched": [
              "Suhas Subramanyam",
              "Subramanyam"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aa1c48bc59f4e034144ba0652d993519062dfcae08a5d3c03081ca08e1bd7252"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
            "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress"
          },
          {
            "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
            "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-caucus-note",
            "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-pdc",
      "label": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An industry vehicle intended to procure and fund next-generation UK payment infrastructure; Sky reports a forthcoming equity solicitation.",
      "roles": [
        "Planned industry-owned infrastructure delivery vehicle"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-fin-pdc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-pdc",
        "name": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
        "role": "Planned industry-owned infrastructure delivery vehicle",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "An industry vehicle intended to procure and fund next-generation UK payment infrastructure; Sky reports a forthcoming equity solicitation.",
        "why": "Capital formation, ownership and procurement could shape future payment access. The reported round is not completed funding.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
            "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
          },
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "title": "Establishing DeliveryCo: Call for Initial Funders",
            "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-fin-note-pdc"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "UK Finance announced the equity-capital process on September 15. EY administers nonbinding expressions of interest; participation remains discretionary. The announcement establishes neither subscribed capital nor shareholder control terms.",
        "structuralRole": "Payment-infrastructure delivery programme",
        "significance": "Separate announced, proposed and exercised authority; inspect the governing record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mechanism and evidence boundary",
            "text": "The planned September equity solicitation is a reported financing step. Historical primary records define the delivery function, but neither source supplies completed funding or final control rights.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              },
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              },
              {
                "title": "Establishing DeliveryCo: Call for Initial Funders",
                "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-rpib-pdc",
              "w44-fin-e-paypal-pdc",
              "w44-fin-e-visa-pdc",
              "w44-fin-e-mastercard-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-pdc"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "September 20 update: UK PDC opens its capital process—not its final ownership register",
            "text": "UK Finance announced the equity-capital process on September 15. EY administers nonbinding expressions of interest; participation remains discretionary. The announcement establishes neither subscribed capital nor shareholder control terms.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK Payments Delivery Company launches equity capital raise",
                "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/uk-payments-delivery-company-launches-equity-capital-raise"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w51-pdc-capital-process"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The July 2025 model assigns design and oversight to RPIB and procurement/funding to the industry-owned Delivery Company.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-rpib-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Retail Payments Infrastructure Board",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Design and delivery oversight",
            "sourceName": "Retail Payments Infrastructure Board",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sky names Mastercard among firms involved in early PDC work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-mastercard-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Mastercard",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported early participation",
            "sourceName": "Mastercard",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sky names PayPal among firms involved in early PDC work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-paypal-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "PayPal",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported early participation",
            "sourceName": "PayPal",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Sky names Visa among firms involved in early PDC work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-visa-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
                "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Visa",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Reported early participation",
            "sourceName": "Visa",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w51-pdc-capital-process",
            "title": "UK PDC opens its capital process—not its final ownership register",
            "heading": "UK PDC opens its capital process—not its final ownership register",
            "text": "UK Finance's September 15 announcement confirms an equity-capital process for UK Payments Delivery Company. It names EY as administrator of nonbinding expressions of interest. Participation and access to information are not guaranteed; expressions of interest may be rejected without reasons.",
            "matched": [
              "UK Payments Delivery Company"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e86dba1067c18476272ebd0d505381a4efb6c8fa656668cb99340b58daa6068f"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
            "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
          },
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "title": "Establishing DeliveryCo: Call for Initial Funders",
            "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Payments Delivery Company launches equity capital raise",
            "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/uk-payments-delivery-company-launches-equity-capital-raise"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-fin-note-pdc",
            "title": "UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-20",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "An industry vehicle intended to procure and fund next-generation UK payment infrastructure; Sky reports a forthcoming equity solicitation.",
          "structuralRole": "Planned industry-owned infrastructure delivery vehicle",
          "significance": "Capital formation, ownership and procurement could shape future payment access. The reported round is not completed funding.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "Sky's September 14 report , published at 19:30 UK (18:30 UTC), says PDC plans a Tuesday equity solicitation of roughly £50m for setup through 2028. The financing terms come from unnamed sources; the spokesperson's statement confirms only the broad mission. This is a new report within the evening window, not evidence that the round has closed.",
            "The BoE's July 2025 model gives RPIB design and oversight responsibilities, assigns industry-owned DeliveryCo procurement and funding, and leaves Pay.UK operating existing systems. The older UK Finance invitation explicitly described expressions of interest as nonbinding. Neither that invitation nor this report establishes capital paid, individual voting rights or awarded contracts.",
            "Visa and Mastercard's reported early involvement complicates a simple story of a new national system displacing foreign incumbents. The useful next records are subscription documents, incorporation and governance terms, design handover and procurement decisions. Until then, the mechanism is institution-building with unresolved financing and control, not a functioning replacement network."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
              "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850"
            },
            {
              "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
              "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
            },
            {
              "title": "Establishing DeliveryCo: Call for Initial Funders",
              "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-rpib",
      "label": "Retail Payments Infrastructure Board",
      "type": "institution",
      "summary": "The Bank of England-chaired board translates public strategy into infrastructure design and oversees the industry delivery vehicle.",
      "roles": [
        "BoE-chaired payment-infrastructure design and oversight board"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-fin-rpib",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-rpib",
        "name": "Retail Payments Infrastructure Board",
        "role": "BoE-chaired payment-infrastructure design and oversight board",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "The Bank of England-chaired board translates public strategy into infrastructure design and oversees the industry delivery vehicle.",
        "why": "Design oversight, procurement and existing-system operation are allocated to different bodies.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-fin-note-pdc"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The Bank of England-chaired board translates public strategy into infrastructure design and oversees the industry delivery vehicle.",
        "structuralRole": "BoE-chaired payment-infrastructure design and oversight board",
        "significance": "Design oversight, procurement and existing-system operation are allocated to different bodies.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mechanism and evidence boundary",
            "text": "The board is a design and oversight interface, not the operating company or the owner of every payment service. Its older mandate is included to interpret the new financing report.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-rpib-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-pdc"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "The July 2025 model assigns design and oversight to RPIB and procurement/funding to the industry-owned Delivery Company.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-rpib-pdc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
                "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Design and delivery oversight",
            "sourceName": "Retail Payments Infrastructure Board",
            "targetName": "UK Payments Delivery Company",
            "date": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
            "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-fin-note-pdc",
            "title": "UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-saca",
      "label": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
      "type": "collective",
      "summary": "Amazon, Netflix and YouTube are founding members of a TechNet-led coalition advocating on streaming access and programming investment.",
      "roles": [
        "Streaming-distribution policy advocacy coalition"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-fin-saca",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-saca",
        "name": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
        "role": "Streaming-distribution policy advocacy coalition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Amazon, Netflix and YouTube are founding members of a TechNet-led coalition advocating on streaming access and programming investment.",
        "why": "The vehicle creates a named channel for shared corporate advocacy; it does not establish that any policy demand has prevailed.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-fin-note-saca"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Amazon, Netflix and YouTube are founding members of a TechNet-led coalition advocating on streaming access and programming investment.",
        "structuralRole": "Streaming-distribution policy advocacy coalition",
        "significance": "The vehicle creates a named channel for shared corporate advocacy; it does not establish that any policy demand has prevailed.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mechanism and evidence boundary",
            "text": "The coalition joins three named streaming firms to a shared policy-advocacy structure. Its preferred access and distribution rules are its platform, not adopted findings.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-technet-saca",
              "w44-fin-e-amazon-saca",
              "w44-fin-e-netflix-saca",
              "w44-fin-e-ed2-youtube-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-saca"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "TechNet names Mike Ward as SACA's leader; the linked public site identifies TechNet as payer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-technet-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "TechNet Research Center index",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/rc/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "TechNet",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Leads the coalition",
            "sourceName": "TechNet",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies YouTube as a SACA founding member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-ed2-youtube-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "YouTube",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founding member",
            "sourceName": "YouTube",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Netflix as a SACA founding member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-netflix-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Netflix",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founding member",
            "sourceName": "Netflix",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Amazon as a SACA founding member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-amazon-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Amazon",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founding member",
            "sourceName": "Amazon",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "TechNet Research Center index",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/rc/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "presentation": {
          "summary": "Amazon, Netflix and YouTube are founding members of a TechNet-led coalition advocating on streaming access and programming investment.",
          "structuralRole": "Streaming-distribution policy advocacy coalition",
          "significance": "The vehicle creates a named channel for shared corporate advocacy; it does not establish that any policy demand has prevailed.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "TechNet's announcement identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. The coalition site seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.",
            "The date needs care. The release says it launched today, and an official search-index entry labels the item September 14. Opening that same index returned older August content; a direct metadata request was forbidden. The calendar date is therefore index-supported and the intraday launch time remains unresolved. It is newly acquired evidence in this pass, not a confidently identified post-noon event.",
            "Members' commercial interests supply a reason to inspect the vehicle, not proof that their policy claims are false or that their preferred rules will win. Lobby registrations, disclosed spending, filed comments and subsequent policy decisions would show how membership becomes practical influence."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
              "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
            },
            {
              "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
              "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
            }
          ],
          "asOf": "2026-09-14"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-technet",
      "label": "TechNet",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "TechNet leads SACA through Mike Ward; the coalition site's footer identifies TechNet as its payer.",
      "roles": [
        "Operator of streaming-policy advocacy coalition"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-fin-technet",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-technet",
        "name": "TechNet",
        "role": "Operator of streaming-policy advocacy coalition",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "TechNet leads SACA through Mike Ward; the coalition site's footer identifies TechNet as its payer.",
        "why": "Named operational leadership is more specific than a general association between member companies.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-fin-note-saca"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "TechNet leads SACA through Mike Ward; the coalition site's footer identifies TechNet as its payer.",
        "structuralRole": "Operator of streaming-policy advocacy coalition",
        "significance": "Named operational leadership is more specific than a general association between member companies.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mechanism and evidence boundary",
            "text": "TechNet supplies named leadership and public sponsorship for SACA. The evidence does not disclose a budget allocation or prove that coalition advocacy has changed law.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-technet-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-saca"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "TechNet names Mike Ward as SACA's leader; the linked public site identifies TechNet as payer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-technet-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "TechNet Research Center index",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/rc/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Leads the coalition",
            "sourceName": "TechNet",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "heading": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "text": "TechNet's announcement identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. The coalition site seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.",
            "matched": [
              "TechNet"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "59d41bb5d8b549c9dd07a06135e27146893166bfe41b322bffe11fd225dd4336"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "TechNet Research Center index",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/rc/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-amazon",
      "label": "Amazon",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Amazon is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance.",
      "roles": [
        "SACA founding member"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-fin-amazon",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-amazon",
        "name": "Amazon",
        "role": "SACA founding member",
        "area": "Platforms & infrastructure",
        "intro": "Amazon is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance.",
        "why": "This is a coalition-membership relationship, not an inference from Amazon Web Services or another corporate grouping.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-fin-note-saca"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Amazon is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance.",
        "structuralRole": "SACA founding member",
        "significance": "This is a coalition-membership relationship, not an inference from Amazon Web Services or another corporate grouping.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mechanism and evidence boundary",
            "text": "Amazon is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance. No contribution amount or policy outcome is established by this membership record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-amazon-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-saca"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Amazon as a SACA founding member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-amazon-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founding member",
            "sourceName": "Amazon",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "heading": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "text": "TechNet's announcement identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. The coalition site seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.",
            "matched": [
              "Amazon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "59d41bb5d8b549c9dd07a06135e27146893166bfe41b322bffe11fd225dd4336"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
            "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
            "heading": "AI and access infrastructure",
            "text": "On November 7 2024, Anthropic and Palantir announced Claude3/3.5 availability using AIP, Amazon SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment. The issuer's release establishes a supplier/integration relationship. It gives no investment percentage, board seat, control right, exclusivity term or contract price. Current continuation must be qualified by the 2026 dispute below. Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS . Separately, the current FedRAMP listing for Palantir Federal Cloud Service, identifier FR2434554673, shows certification since November 19 2024, Rev5/Class D(High), ongoing certification and20 ATO/ATU letters. That is an access qualification, not an IL6 determination or an endorsement of a particular operational use. Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing .",
            "matched": [
              "Amazon"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e3ebb3efa2f3d294ff08ad0a0d09d809f37e524950f5a58c9678a15467857438"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-netflix",
      "label": "Netflix",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Netflix is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance.",
      "roles": [
        "SACA founding member"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "distribution"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-fin-netflix",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-netflix",
        "name": "Netflix",
        "role": "SACA founding member",
        "area": "Platforms & infrastructure",
        "intro": "Netflix is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance.",
        "why": "Membership links a streaming platform to a specific Washington advocacy vehicle; spending and influence outcomes are not disclosed here.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-fin-note-saca"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Netflix is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance.",
        "structuralRole": "SACA founding member",
        "significance": "Membership links a streaming platform to a specific Washington advocacy vehicle; spending and influence outcomes are not disclosed here.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Mechanism and evidence boundary",
            "text": "Netflix is identified as a founding member of the Streaming Access and Choice Alliance. No contribution amount or policy outcome is established by this membership record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-netflix-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-fin-note-saca"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Netflix as a SACA founding member.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-fin-e-netflix-saca"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
                "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
                "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founding member",
            "sourceName": "Netflix",
            "targetName": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "date": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved."
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "heading": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
            "text": "TechNet's announcement identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. The coalition site seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.",
            "matched": [
              "Netflix"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "59d41bb5d8b549c9dd07a06135e27146893166bfe41b322bffe11fd225dd4336"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
            "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
            "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-fin-note-saca",
            "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-ai-mai-code",
      "label": "Microsoft AI Humanist Code of Conduct — draft",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Microsoft AI's September 14 public consultation draft for MAI-produced models; not yet used to train current models.",
      "roles": [
        "Company model-governance draft"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "MAI Code of Conduct",
        "Humanist AI Code of Conduct"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w44-ai-mai-code",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-ai-mai-code",
        "name": "Microsoft AI Humanist Code of Conduct — draft",
        "role": "Company model-governance draft",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "intro": "Microsoft AI's September 14 public consultation draft for MAI-produced models; not yet used to train current models.",
        "why": "Company rule-setting and consultation are distinct from external enforcement.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [
          "MAI Code of Conduct",
          "Humanist AI Code of Conduct"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Microsoft AI's September 14 public consultation draft for MAI-produced models; not yet used to train current models.",
        "structuralRole": "Company-authored model rulebook",
        "significance": "The rule-setting owner remains Microsoft; consultation does not transfer approval rights to respondents.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Scope, authority and evidence state",
            "text": "The draft applies to MAI-produced models. Its constraints outrank operator and user preferences, but it does not replace applicable law or deployment governance. The code is not yet a current-model training document; evaluations remain in development.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Publication clock",
            "text": "Initially published September 14 at13:00Z and newly examined during the evening pass. The17:44:20Z page-modified timestamp cannot establish a substantive revision without an earlier version.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Microsoft AI issued the draft and opened six weeks of public feedback.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
                "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Microsoft",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes MAI consultation draft",
            "sourceName": "Microsoft",
            "targetName": "Microsoft AI Humanist Code of Conduct — draft",
            "date": "Evening catch-up 14 September 2026; original publication 13:00Z; captured after 23:00:27Z cutoff."
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits",
            "title": "Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-dario-amodei",
      "label": "Dario Amodei",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Anthropic co-founder and CEO; Daniela Amodei's brother.",
      "roles": [
        "Anthropic CEO"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w45-dario-amodei",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w45-dario-amodei",
        "name": "Dario Amodei",
        "role": "Anthropic CEO",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Anthropic co-founder and CEO; Daniela Amodei's brother.",
        "why": "His public role makes the sibling relationship relevant to the governance network, not evidence of METR control.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic leadership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME profile of the Amodei siblings",
            "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anthropic co-founder and CEO; Daniela Amodei's brother.",
        "structuralRole": "Frontier-lab executive",
        "significance": "Family connection is documented; no METR authority follows from it.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Family and professional role",
            "text": "Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and Anthropic co-founders. Daniela is married to Holden Karnofsky, making him Dario's brother-in-law. This public connection is not a METR appointment or funding transaction.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TIME profile",
                "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Holden interview transcript",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-siblings",
              "w45-e-marriage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and co-founders of Anthropic.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-siblings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TIME profile of Dario and Daniela Amodei",
                "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic leadership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Daniela Amodei",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Siblings and Anthropic co-founders",
            "sourceName": "Dario Amodei",
            "targetName": "Daniela Amodei",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "frontier-pacing-and-evaluator-access",
            "title": "Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside",
            "heading": "Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside",
            "text": "In September 2026, Dario Amodei committed Anthropic to ongoing outside reviewers with access comparable to internal risk staff. He proposed shared industry standards and government-supported coordination next. The planned reviewers could publish findings, with specified redactions; METR appears as an example, not an appointment. The contract, selected team and practical handling of access disputes remain the decisive missing records. Read Amodei’s essay .",
            "matched": [
              "Dario Amodei"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "63c7a4eeb58a1c0203ea1ba8c4e8cd80287c53a50a0769eef44c0add818c5e9a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic leadership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME profile of the Amodei siblings",
            "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Holden interview transcript",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-16"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-daniela-amodei",
      "label": "Daniela Amodei",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Anthropic co-founder and president; Dario's sister and Holden Karnofsky's wife.",
      "roles": [
        "Anthropic president"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w45-daniela-amodei",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w45-daniela-amodei",
        "name": "Daniela Amodei",
        "role": "Anthropic president",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Anthropic co-founder and president; Dario's sister and Holden Karnofsky's wife.",
        "why": "The public family relationship joins two Anthropic leaders and a former philanthropy executive; it does not identify a METR decision-maker.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic leadership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME profile of the Amodei siblings",
            "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Holden Karnofsky interview transcript, p. 28",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Anthropic co-founder and president; Dario's sister and Holden Karnofsky's wife.",
        "structuralRole": "Frontier-lab executive",
        "significance": "The family bridge is public, but is not a grant or reviewer-control record.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Public family link",
            "text": "A TIME profile identifies the Amodei siblings; Karnofsky identifies Daniela as his wife in an interview. Their relationship does not itself identify any METR decision-maker.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TIME profile",
                "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Holden interview transcript",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-siblings",
              "w45-e-marriage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Karnofsky identifies Daniela Amodei as his wife in a published interview transcript.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-marriage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ezra Klein interviews Holden Karnofsky, transcript",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Spouses",
            "sourceName": "Daniela Amodei",
            "targetName": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and co-founders of Anthropic.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-siblings"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "TIME profile of Dario and Daniela Amodei",
                "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic leadership",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dario Amodei",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Siblings and Anthropic co-founders",
            "sourceName": "Dario Amodei",
            "targetName": "Daniela Amodei",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "The family connection",
            "text": "Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and Anthropic co-founders. Holden Karnofsky calls Daniela his wife; that makes him Dario's brother-in-law. Karnofsky was Open Philanthropy's CEO before stepping down in 2023 and later appears on an Anthropic risk-report byline . These are public family and career facts, not proof of METR control or an undisclosed transfer. TIME · Holden interview, p. 28 · Open Philanthropy leadership account .",
            "matched": [
              "Daniela Amodei"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "16425be0aad3ceffb37fc375960170a4b4eda140571fd287be55eea1606c1293"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic leadership",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership"
          },
          {
            "title": "TIME profile of the Amodei siblings",
            "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Holden Karnofsky interview transcript, p. 28",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-16"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-holden-karnofsky",
      "label": "Holden Karnofsky",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Former Open Philanthropy CEO and Anthropic risk-report coauthor; married to Daniela Amodei.",
      "roles": [
        "Former philanthropic leader; Anthropic risk-report author"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w45-holden-karnofsky",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w45-holden-karnofsky",
        "name": "Holden Karnofsky",
        "role": "Former philanthropic leader; Anthropic risk-report author",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Former Open Philanthropy CEO and Anthropic risk-report coauthor; married to Daniela Amodei.",
        "why": "His documented professional and family roles show an institutional bridge, not a demonstrated funding channel into METR.",
        "about": [],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coefficient Giving account of former CEO",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Holden Karnofsky interview transcript, p. 28",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic pilot sabotage risk report byline",
            "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Former Open Philanthropy CEO and Anthropic risk-report coauthor; married to Daniela Amodei.",
        "structuralRole": "Philanthropy-to-lab personnel bridge",
        "significance": "A traceable career and family link, not proof of a METR grant.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Former donor-side role, later lab publication",
            "text": "Open Philanthropy says Karnofsky stepped down as CEO in 2023 to focus on AI safety. Anthropic names him on a 2025 risk report. Karnofsky says Daniela Amodei is his wife. None of these records shows him financing or directing METR.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Open Philanthropy leadership account",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Anthropic risk report",
                "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Holden interview transcript",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-marriage",
              "w45-e-former-ceo",
              "w45-e-anthropic-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The organization now named Coefficient Giving identifies Karnofsky as its former CEO, who stepped down in 2023.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-former-ceo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our Progress in 2023 and Plans for 2024",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former CEO of Open Philanthropy",
            "sourceName": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Karnofsky identifies Daniela Amodei as his wife in a published interview transcript.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-marriage"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Ezra Klein interviews Holden Karnofsky, transcript",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Daniela Amodei",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Spouses",
            "sourceName": "Daniela Amodei",
            "targetName": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Anthropic credits Karnofsky as a main-report author in October 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w45-e-anthropic-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Anthropic's Pilot Sabotage Risk Report",
                "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coauthored Anthropic pilot risk report",
            "sourceName": "Holden Karnofsky",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-16"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "The family connection",
            "text": "Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and Anthropic co-founders. Holden Karnofsky calls Daniela his wife; that makes him Dario's brother-in-law. Karnofsky was Open Philanthropy's CEO before stepping down in 2023 and later appears on an Anthropic risk-report byline . These are public family and career facts, not proof of METR control or an undisclosed transfer. TIME · Holden interview, p. 28 · Open Philanthropy leadership account .",
            "matched": [
              "Holden Karnofsky",
              "Karnofsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "16425be0aad3ceffb37fc375960170a4b4eda140571fd287be55eea1606c1293"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
            "heading": "EA and TESCREAL",
            "text": "Open Philanthropy's own account places Karnofsky in an effective-altruist institution. Gebru and Torres's TESCREAL paper groups transhumanism, Extropianism, singularitarianism, cosmism, Rationalism, effective altruism and longtermism into a critical historical argument. It is not a membership list. A 2024 TIME profile reported Anthropic saying neither Amodei sibling personally identified as EA, while acknowledging sympathy for some ideas. Documented relationships and policy proposals can be examined without converting an ideological label into proof of a coordinated bloc.",
            "matched": [
              "Karnofsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "91499fa8ef33792707bf2e6adb2e63ce7f141787bc20694d5397932947872458"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coefficient Giving account of former CEO",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Holden Karnofsky interview transcript, p. 28",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Anthropic pilot sabotage risk report byline",
            "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
            "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-16"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Lightcone Commons",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A Lightcone Infrastructure platform that coordinates donors, grant evaluators and allocations.",
      "roles": [
        "Grant-allocation infrastructure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-commons",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-commons",
        "name": "Lightcone Commons",
        "role": "Grant-allocation infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A Lightcone Infrastructure platform that coordinates donors, grant evaluators and allocations.",
        "why": "It makes the delegation of philanthropic judgment visible: donors choose evaluators, whose recommendations steer funding.",
        "about": [
          "The announced first round brings together Tallinn, Moskovitz, LTFF and the AI Risk Mitigation Fund. Confirmed evaluators include Yudkowsky, Soares, Parikh and Habryka. Donors retain final allocation decisions. The normal charges are 3% for the platform and 2% for evaluators, with reductions and waivers. The first-round sums are tentative; recommendations are scheduled for October 23, 2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A Lightcone Infrastructure platform that coordinates donors, grant evaluators and allocations.",
        "structuralRole": "Grant-allocation infrastructure",
        "significance": "It makes the delegation of philanthropic judgment visible: donors choose evaluators, whose recommendations steer funding.",
        "background": [
          "The announced first round brings together Tallinn, Moskovitz, LTFF and the AI Risk Mitigation Fund. Confirmed evaluators include Yudkowsky, Soares, Parikh and Habryka. Donors retain final allocation decisions. The normal charges are 3% for the platform and 2% for evaluators, with reductions and waivers. The first-round sums are tentative; recommendations are scheduled for October 23, 2026."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The announced first round brings together Tallinn, Moskovitz, LTFF and the AI Risk Mitigation Fund. Confirmed evaluators include Yudkowsky, Soares, Parikh and Habryka. Donors retain final allocation decisions. The normal charges are 3% for the platform and 2% for evaluators, with reductions and waivers. The first-round sums are tentative; recommendations are scheduled for October 23, 2026.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-commons-operator",
              "w46-e-habryka-commons",
              "w46-e-parikh-commons",
              "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons",
              "w46-e-soares-commons",
              "w46-e-tallinn-commons",
              "w46-e-moskovitz-commons",
              "w46-e-arm-commons",
              "w46-e-ltff-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Who can refuse a grant",
            "text": "Donors keep a final veto on direct grants after the recipient signs. Lightcone can refuse processing through its nonprofit or LLC facilities; funders can arrange payment independently. The FAQ does not identify every legal counterparty.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LTFF plans to distribute up to three quarters of its remaining balance, approximately $2.8 million, to existing applications and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons. LTFF managers retain final allocation decisions.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-ltff-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Planned spend-down channel; fees waived",
            "sourceName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Commons lists approximately $5 million from Moskovitz for the first round and $10 million over the first year if it goes well.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-moskovitz-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tentative ~$5m first round",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Commons participant list identifies Yudkowsky as a confirmed evaluator, alongside his MIRI background.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
            "sourceName": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The first-round list anticipates $10 million from Tallinn if other funders contribute $10 million.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-tallinn-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tentative $10m; matching condition",
            "sourceName": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Habryka can admit evaluators; funders expecting at least $50,000 per round may also bring them.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Oliver Habryka",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder, evaluator and evaluator admission",
            "sourceName": "Oliver Habryka",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Commons participant list identifies Soares as a confirmed evaluator.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-soares-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Nate Soares",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
            "sourceName": "Nate Soares",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Commons names the ARM Fund as a tentative first-round funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-arm-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tentative ~$2m participation",
            "sourceName": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Listed among the confirmed evaluators for the first round.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Caleb Parikh",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "Who allocates the money?",
            "text": "Lightcone Commons is operated by Lightcone Infrastructure, the organization behind LessWrong and Lighthaven. It is distinct from the similarly named Lightcone Foundation already in the investigation.",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Commons"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "da6feb17242c196e5e76a87a5f50d53514bceaa52e1e1414d7edd21c39864e0c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Lightcone Commons makes a useful distinction visible: choosing where money ought to go and possessing the authority to send it are different jobs. Its published process lets funders bring evaluators or use those selected by Oliver Habryka. Funders retain a last opportunity to veto direct grants after recipients sign agreements. Lightcone can refuse transactions through its own nonprofit or LLC facilities, while funders can arrange payment themselves. The FAQ does not name both legal counterparties. Commons process",
            "matched": [
              "Lightcone Commons"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a4416682d4ee7ac211d21cec739795416ea9695b5518d528be615de4aacb8a29"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          },
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
            "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-habryka",
      "label": "Oliver Habryka",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Lightcone Infrastructure CEO and founder of Lightcone Commons; an outgoing LTFF fund manager.",
      "roles": [
        "Platform builder and grant evaluator"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-habryka",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-habryka",
        "name": "Oliver Habryka",
        "role": "Platform builder and grant evaluator",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Lightcone Infrastructure CEO and founder of Lightcone Commons; an outgoing LTFF fund manager.",
        "why": "He connects LessWrong community infrastructure with a new mechanism for directing philanthropic capital.",
        "about": [
          "Habryka operates on both sides of the organizational transition: the outgoing LTFF team and the new Commons allocation platform. He is a confirmed Commons evaluator. This puts institutional design, applicant access and grant judgment together in one public professional role."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Lightcone Infrastructure CEO and founder of Lightcone Commons; an outgoing LTFF fund manager.",
        "structuralRole": "Platform builder and grant evaluator",
        "significance": "He connects LessWrong community infrastructure with a new mechanism for directing philanthropic capital.",
        "background": [
          "Habryka operates on both sides of the organizational transition: the outgoing LTFF team and the new Commons allocation platform. He is a confirmed Commons evaluator. This puts institutional design, applicant access and grant judgment together in one public professional role."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Habryka operates on both sides of the organizational transition: the outgoing LTFF team and the new Commons allocation platform. He is a confirmed Commons evaluator. This puts institutional design, applicant access and grant judgment together in one public professional role.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-lightcone",
              "w46-e-habryka-commons",
              "w46-e-habryka-ltff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A dated board-governance checkpoint",
            "text": "On July 22, 2026, Habryka said a corrective board-removal resolution was drafted but unsigned and publicly committed to the board’s removal power. The statement describes that date; a signed instrument would establish what followed.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Habryka reply about Lightcone board-removal arrangements",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform?commentId=JeW6ShEqiajquE59o"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Habryka can admit evaluators; funders expecting at least $50,000 per round may also bring them.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder, evaluator and evaluator admission",
            "sourceName": "Oliver Habryka",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The closure announcement names Habryka as a fund manager and Commons founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-ltff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Outgoing fund manager",
            "sourceName": "Oliver Habryka",
            "targetName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Commons identifies Habryka as Lightcone Infrastructure CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-habryka-lightcone"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Oliver Habryka",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "The people connecting the arrangements",
            "text": "Habryka bridges the outgoing LTFF and the Commons platform he founded. Parikh bridges LTFF, the ARM Fund, Commons evaluation and an advisory role at the new TAIF. Lowe Lundin heads TAIF , with a new full-time team.",
            "matched": [
              "Habryka"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "db4afcd764a94b7897d178646a5dd030c8a95f7b47d2530b49fd6b148dc088f1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Lightcone Commons makes a useful distinction visible: choosing where money ought to go and possessing the authority to send it are different jobs. Its published process lets funders bring evaluators or use those selected by Oliver Habryka. Funders retain a last opportunity to veto direct grants after recipients sign agreements. Lightcone can refuse transactions through its own nonprofit or LLC facilities, while funders can arrange payment themselves. The FAQ does not name both legal counterparties. Commons process",
            "matched": [
              "Oliver Habryka",
              "Habryka"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a4416682d4ee7ac211d21cec739795416ea9695b5518d528be615de4aacb8a29"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "heading": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
            "text": "Credit arrangements reveal obligations that donation totals miss. On 31 March 2023 , Lightcone's Oliver Habryka described a $20 million property-and-renovation loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. His 13 December 2025 fundraiser describes a separate $1.7 million FTX-settlement advance: Tallinn would pay half of future grant recommendations until $1.29 million had been withheld. This shows how an earlier arrangement can affect later disbursements. Loan documents, current balances, and consent rights remain unexamined; these terms cannot be imported into ControlAI's grants.",
            "matched": [
              "Oliver Habryka",
              "Habryka"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "9b7412a23d1efae5ac48d2336b4212259745b3763ce1a5b5cd33026985efc3ed"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "That makes the movement of the AI Risk Mitigation Fund significant. In a December 2025 fundraising account, Habryka announced that ARM had become a Lightcone programme under substantial leadership from Caleb Parikh. ARM's own website still describes donations through Effective Ventures' US or UK charities. The announced move is clear; a current sponsorship instrument would settle how outstanding restrictions and liabilities travelled with it. Lightcone account , ARM disclosure",
            "matched": [
              "Habryka"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "961f668d15889dcb27213dad2ae5416d1983d82550e688f81a85403331afb7d3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          },
          {
            "title": "Habryka reply about Lightcone board-removal arrangements",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform?commentId=JeW6ShEqiajquE59o"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-parikh",
      "label": "Caleb Parikh",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Outgoing LTFF manager, AI Risk Mitigation Fund managing director and adviser to the new Transformative AI Fund.",
      "roles": [
        "Bridge between grantmaking institutions"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-parikh",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-parikh",
        "name": "Caleb Parikh",
        "role": "Bridge between grantmaking institutions",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Outgoing LTFF manager, AI Risk Mitigation Fund managing director and adviser to the new Transformative AI Fund.",
        "why": "His roles span the closing fund, an alternative fund, the new CEA fund and Commons evaluation.",
        "about": [
          "Parikh explains the LTFF closure as a change of team and operating preferences. He says CEA legal and reputational constraints affected his grant choices. He is a confirmed Commons evaluator and a TAIF adviser, allowing experience and applications to move between institutions even as their governance arrangements diverge."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          },
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Outgoing LTFF manager, AI Risk Mitigation Fund managing director and adviser to the new Transformative AI Fund.",
        "structuralRole": "Bridge between grantmaking institutions",
        "significance": "His roles span the closing fund, an alternative fund, the new CEA fund and Commons evaluation.",
        "background": [
          "Parikh explains the LTFF closure as a change of team and operating preferences. He says CEA legal and reputational constraints affected his grant choices. He is a confirmed Commons evaluator and a TAIF adviser, allowing experience and applications to move between institutions even as their governance arrangements diverge."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Parikh explains the LTFF closure as a change of team and operating preferences. He says CEA legal and reputational constraints affected his grant choices. He is a confirmed Commons evaluator and a TAIF adviser, allowing experience and applications to move between institutions even as their governance arrangements diverge.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              },
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-commons",
              "w46-e-parikh-arm",
              "w46-e-parikh-ltff",
              "w46-e-parikh-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Parikh announces the managers' departure and closure of the LTFF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-ltff"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Outgoing fund manager",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Listed among the confirmed evaluators for the first round.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Commons evaluator biography identifies this role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-arm"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Managing director",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The fund page lists Parikh as an adviser.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fund adviser",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "text": "Caleb Parikh says CEA's legal and reputational constraints affected the grants he would consider. Individuals, companies and policy-adjacent work could be operationally difficult. He regards CEA's tradeoff as reasonable but prefers a different one. The outgoing managers also cite other opportunities and preferences about how grant judgment should be developed.",
            "matched": [
              "Caleb Parikh",
              "Parikh"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "e4994427dfa0bddad9995185851efcccb5c5fe1f98da6f377b634706cd6b4d15"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "The people connecting the arrangements",
            "text": "Habryka bridges the outgoing LTFF and the Commons platform he founded. Parikh bridges LTFF, the ARM Fund, Commons evaluation and an advisory role at the new TAIF. Lowe Lundin heads TAIF , with a new full-time team.",
            "matched": [
              "Parikh"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "db4afcd764a94b7897d178646a5dd030c8a95f7b47d2530b49fd6b148dc088f1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "That makes the movement of the AI Risk Mitigation Fund significant. In a December 2025 fundraising account, Habryka announced that ARM had become a Lightcone programme under substantial leadership from Caleb Parikh. ARM's own website still describes donations through Effective Ventures' US or UK charities. The announced move is clear; a current sponsorship instrument would settle how outstanding restrictions and liabilities travelled with it. Lightcone account , ARM disclosure",
            "matched": [
              "Caleb Parikh",
              "Parikh"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "961f668d15889dcb27213dad2ae5416d1983d82550e688f81a85403331afb7d3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          },
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-arm",
      "label": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An AI-focused grantmaking fund listed as a tentative contributor to Lightcone Commons.",
      "roles": [
        "AI philanthropic fund"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "ARM Fund"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-arm",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-arm",
        "name": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
        "role": "AI philanthropic fund",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An AI-focused grantmaking fund listed as a tentative contributor to Lightcone Commons.",
        "why": "It adds another allocator to the Commons round and shares a named grantmaker with LTFF and TAIF.",
        "about": [
          "The Commons participant list identifies Caleb Parikh as managing director and lists approximately $2 million of tentative first-round participation. Parikh says some outgoing LTFF managers plan to continue part-time grantmaking through this fund and Commons."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "ARM Fund"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An AI-focused grantmaking fund listed as a tentative contributor to Lightcone Commons.",
        "structuralRole": "AI philanthropic fund",
        "significance": "It adds another allocator to the Commons round and shares a named grantmaker with LTFF and TAIF.",
        "background": [
          "The Commons participant list identifies Caleb Parikh as managing director and lists approximately $2 million of tentative first-round participation. Parikh says some outgoing LTFF managers plan to continue part-time grantmaking through this fund and Commons."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The Commons participant list identifies Caleb Parikh as managing director and lists approximately $2 million of tentative first-round participation. Parikh says some outgoing LTFF managers plan to continue part-time grantmaking through this fund and Commons.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-arm-commons",
              "w46-e-parikh-arm"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Announced move to Lightcone",
            "text": "Habryka’s December 2025 account says ARM became a Lightcone programme under substantial Parikh leadership. ARM’s About page still identifies Effective Ventures donation entities. The programme announcement is established; the legal transfer instrument remains the useful next record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone 2026 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund: About",
                "url": "https://www.airiskfund.com/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-lightcone-arm"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Commons names the ARM Fund as a tentative first-round funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-arm-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Tentative ~$2m participation",
            "sourceName": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Habryka announced ARM had become a Lightcone programme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-lightcone-arm"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone 2026 fundraiser",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund: About",
                "url": "https://www.airiskfund.com/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announced programme migration",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The Commons evaluator biography identifies this role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-arm"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
                "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Caleb Parikh",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Managing director",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "The people connecting the arrangements",
            "text": "Habryka bridges the outgoing LTFF and the Commons platform he founded. Parikh bridges LTFF, the ARM Fund, Commons evaluation and an advisory role at the new TAIF. Lowe Lundin heads TAIF , with a new full-time team.",
            "matched": [
              "ARM Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "db4afcd764a94b7897d178646a5dd030c8a95f7b47d2530b49fd6b148dc088f1"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "Who allocates the money?",
            "text": "Commons' tentative first-round list includes Tallinn with $10 million conditional on another $10 million, Moskovitz with approximately $5 million, and the LTFF and ARM Fund. Confirmed evaluators include Yudkowsky, Soares, Parikh and Habryka. A separate wish list names people who have not agreed; we have not mapped that list as participation.",
            "matched": [
              "ARM Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "8d70bee1b332d7d699212a71d6fa73beca7e58ed8e61dc78a08b6a956e50d988"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "That makes the movement of the AI Risk Mitigation Fund significant. In a December 2025 fundraising account, Habryka announced that ARM had become a Lightcone programme under substantial leadership from Caleb Parikh. ARM's own website still describes donations through Effective Ventures' US or UK charities. The announced move is clear; a current sponsorship instrument would settle how outstanding restrictions and liabilities travelled with it. Lightcone account , ARM disclosure",
            "matched": [
              "AI Risk Mitigation Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "961f668d15889dcb27213dad2ae5416d1983d82550e688f81a85403331afb7d3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
            "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lightcone 2026 fundraiser",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund: About",
            "url": "https://www.airiskfund.com/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-eafunds",
      "label": "EA Funds",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An effective-altruist grantmaking platform that houses the new Transformative AI Fund.",
      "roles": [
        "Pooled-donation grantmaking"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Effective Altruism Funds"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-eafunds",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-eafunds",
        "name": "EA Funds",
        "role": "Pooled-donation grantmaking",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An effective-altruist grantmaking platform that houses the new Transformative AI Fund.",
        "why": "It turns many donors into pooled programmes with specialist managers deciding which projects receive early support.",
        "about": [
          "EA Funds replaced the closing LTFF with a distinct AI-focused fund and a new full-time team. The launch retains an accessible route for individuals and small organizations seeking seed funding. CEA houses the new fund; it is not simply the old LTFF with a new name."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Effective Altruism Funds"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An effective-altruist grantmaking platform that houses the new Transformative AI Fund.",
        "structuralRole": "Pooled-donation grantmaking",
        "significance": "It turns many donors into pooled programmes with specialist managers deciding which projects receive early support.",
        "background": [
          "EA Funds replaced the closing LTFF with a distinct AI-focused fund and a new full-time team. The launch retains an accessible route for individuals and small organizations seeking seed funding. CEA houses the new fund; it is not simply the old LTFF with a new name."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "EA Funds replaced the closing LTFF with a distinct AI-focused fund and a new full-time team. The launch retains an accessible route for individuals and small organizations seeking seed funding. CEA houses the new fund; it is not simply the old LTFF with a new name.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              },
              {
                "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-eafunds-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "EA Funds announces a new AI seed fund with a new full-time team.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-eafunds-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
              },
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Launches new AI fund",
            "sourceName": "EA Funds",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "The education funding is specific too. EA Funds’ ledger , which returns CSV, lists one joint $394,968 grant to Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo in the third quarter of 2022 for an online course about pursuing high-impact work. It does not identify the course or receiving organization, so the map keeps the grant attached to its named recipients.",
            "matched": [
              "EA Funds"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a5e9743efb5b887ef30a3d9871b7eae428c05b5d1f2042aec41a5210881ea77"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The safeguards deserve the same specificity. EA Funds' published conflict policy grades recusals by severity but permits carefully considered exceptions; public disclosure of recusals is optional. Separately, on July 22 Habryka said a resolution correcting Lightcone's board-removal arrangements had been drafted but remained unsigned, and publicly committed to treating the board as able to remove him. That statement establishes an unresolved step on that date; the signed instrument would establish what followed. EA Funds policy , dated governance discussion",
            "matched": [
              "EA Funds"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "aac57695da12c53ef802a439da2c49929aad44c05ed9c3133426b2d9949eca1b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-taif",
      "label": "Transformative AI Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "EA Funds programme for early-stage projects addressing advanced AI, led by Lowe Lundin.",
      "roles": [
        "Seed fund for new AI institutions"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "TAIF"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-taif",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-taif",
        "name": "Transformative AI Fund",
        "role": "Seed fund for new AI institutions",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "EA Funds programme for early-stage projects addressing advanced AI, led by Lowe Lundin.",
        "why": "Small initial grants can create the organizations that later become candidates for much larger funding.",
        "about": [
          "Typical grants are $10,000-$150,000 and rarely exceed $300,000. The scope includes technical research, policy analysis, advocacy, training and infrastructure, with some interest in digital sentience and flourishing futures. Its launch argues that the field needs more organizations capable of employing trained people and using future philanthropic capital."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "TAIF"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "EA Funds programme for early-stage projects addressing advanced AI, led by Lowe Lundin.",
        "structuralRole": "Seed fund for new AI institutions",
        "significance": "Small initial grants can create the organizations that later become candidates for much larger funding.",
        "background": [
          "Typical grants are $10,000-$150,000 and rarely exceed $300,000. The scope includes technical research, policy analysis, advocacy, training and infrastructure, with some interest in digital sentience and flourishing futures. Its launch argues that the field needs more organizations capable of employing trained people and using future philanthropic capital."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Typical grants are $10,000-$150,000 and rarely exceed $300,000. The scope includes technical research, policy analysis, advocacy, training and infrastructure, with some interest in digital sentience and flourishing futures. Its launch argues that the field needs more organizations capable of employing trained people and using future philanthropic capital.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              },
              {
                "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-ltff-taif",
              "w46-e-eafunds-taif",
              "w46-e-cea-taif",
              "w46-e-lundin-taif",
              "w46-e-parikh-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Conflict controls",
            "text": "The currently linked EA Funds policy, dated March 2023, grades recusals by severity. It permits reasoned chair/director exceptions when alternatives are inadequate and does not require public disclosure of every recusal. A particular grant needs its own decision record.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds Conflict of Interest Policy",
                "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSN-VoZLgy1U676-vuLK_fOL6mcQ_K1qGWXzlBhQJg0/edit"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "LTFF announces approximately one quarter of its remaining balance as a seed grant for the new fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-ltff-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announced ~$0.9m seed allocation",
            "sourceName": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The outgoing LTFF manager identifies the new programme as CEA-housed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-cea-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Institutional home",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "EA Funds announces a new AI seed fund with a new full-time team.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-eafunds-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
              },
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EA Funds",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Launches new AI fund",
            "sourceName": "EA Funds",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The fund page lists Parikh as an adviser.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-parikh-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Caleb Parikh",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fund adviser",
            "sourceName": "Caleb Parikh",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The fund page names Lundin as head.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-lundin-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lowe Lundin",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Head of fund",
            "sourceName": "Lowe Lundin",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "text": "Their proposed spend-down divides roughly $2.8 million for existing applicants and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons, from roughly $0.9 million to seed a new CEA-housed Transformative AI Fund. The outgoing managers retain final decisions over their allocation. Commons waives its normal platform and evaluator fees for the LTFF contribution.",
            "matched": [
              "Transformative AI Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6e56395f91005b115e08a4dbb6197e07ecc9a0e35b685a4c039c76c5209df8f8"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "An ecosystem preparing for more wealth",
            "text": "The new Transformative AI Fund supplies a smaller-scale entry point. Its typical $10,000-$150,000 grants can pay for a pilot, a first hire or a new organization. Its launch rationale anticipates more philanthropic wealth and argues that suitable organizations need to be created before that money arrives.",
            "matched": [
              "Transformative AI Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ebf8ae6a74db835697a109d0f0277b532886abe13191436bedd273ebc833e4bc"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSN-VoZLgy1U676-vuLK_fOL6mcQ_K1qGWXzlBhQJg0/edit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-lundin",
      "label": "Lowe Lundin",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Head of the Transformative AI Fund at EA Funds.",
      "roles": [
        "Early-stage grant allocator"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-lundin",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-lundin",
        "name": "Lowe Lundin",
        "role": "Early-stage grant allocator",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Head of the Transformative AI Fund at EA Funds.",
        "why": "He leads the new team deciding which small AI projects get the money to begin.",
        "about": [
          "The fund launch gives Lundin responsibility for an AI-focused seed-grant programme, separate from the outgoing LTFF managers. He also participates in the transition process for LTFF applications; the outgoing managers retain final decisions for their remaining allocation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Head of the Transformative AI Fund at EA Funds.",
        "structuralRole": "Early-stage grant allocator",
        "significance": "He leads the new team deciding which small AI projects get the money to begin.",
        "background": [
          "The fund launch gives Lundin responsibility for an AI-focused seed-grant programme, separate from the outgoing LTFF managers. He also participates in the transition process for LTFF applications; the outgoing managers retain final decisions for their remaining allocation."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The fund launch gives Lundin responsibility for an AI-focused seed-grant programme, separate from the outgoing LTFF managers. He also participates in the transition process for LTFF applications; the outgoing managers retain final decisions for their remaining allocation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              },
              {
                "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-lundin-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The fund page names Lundin as head.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-lundin-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Head of fund",
            "sourceName": "Lowe Lundin",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-cea",
      "label": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "EA community institution and home of the new AI seed-funding programme.",
      "roles": [
        "Community building and institutional host"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "CEA"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-cea",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-cea",
        "name": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
        "role": "Community building and institutional host",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "EA community institution and home of the new AI seed-funding programme.",
        "why": "Its operational and legal boundaries shape what affiliated fund managers can fund.",
        "about": [
          "CEA supports the effective-altruism community through events, groups and online discussion. Its CEO Zachary Robinson previously managed communications and grantmaking functions at Open Philanthropy. The LTFF closure exposes a concrete governance tradeoff: hosting infrastructure brings legal and reputational constraints that some outgoing managers preferred to leave."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "CEA"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "EA community institution and home of the new AI seed-funding programme.",
        "structuralRole": "Community building and institutional host",
        "significance": "Its operational and legal boundaries shape what affiliated fund managers can fund.",
        "background": [
          "CEA supports the effective-altruism community through events, groups and online discussion. Its CEO Zachary Robinson previously managed communications and grantmaking functions at Open Philanthropy. The LTFF closure exposes a concrete governance tradeoff: hosting infrastructure brings legal and reputational constraints that some outgoing managers preferred to leave."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "CEA supports the effective-altruism community through events, groups and online discussion. Its CEO Zachary Robinson previously managed communications and grantmaking functions at Open Philanthropy. The LTFF closure exposes a concrete governance tradeoff: hosting infrastructure brings legal and reputational constraints that some outgoing managers preferred to leave.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              },
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-cea-taif",
              "w46-e-evusa-cea",
              "w46-e-robinson-cea"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The outgoing LTFF manager identifies the new programme as CEA-housed.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-cea-taif"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Institutional home",
            "sourceName": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "targetName": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "CEA's press kit identifies EV USA as its fiscal sponsor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-evusa-cea"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
            "targetName": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CEA records Robinson's appointment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-cea"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Zachary Robinson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO since February 2024",
            "sourceName": "Zachary Robinson",
            "targetName": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-evusa",
      "label": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "The US fiscal sponsor of the Centre for Effective Altruism.",
      "roles": [
        "Fiscal sponsor"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "EV USA"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-evusa",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-evusa",
        "name": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
        "role": "Fiscal sponsor",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "The US fiscal sponsor of the Centre for Effective Altruism.",
        "why": "Fiscal sponsorship supplies the legal and operational home within which a project works.",
        "about": [
          "CEA identifies Effective Ventures Foundation USA as its fiscal sponsor and says Zachary Robinson is CEO of both. This US legal entity is recorded separately from the broader Effective Ventures federation."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "EV USA"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "The US fiscal sponsor of the Centre for Effective Altruism.",
        "structuralRole": "Fiscal sponsor",
        "significance": "Fiscal sponsorship supplies the legal and operational home within which a project works.",
        "background": [
          "CEA identifies Effective Ventures Foundation USA as its fiscal sponsor and says Zachary Robinson is CEO of both. This US legal entity is recorded separately from the broader Effective Ventures federation."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "CEA identifies Effective Ventures Foundation USA as its fiscal sponsor and says Zachary Robinson is CEO of both. This US legal entity is recorded separately from the broader Effective Ventures federation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-evusa-cea",
              "w46-e-robinson-evusa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CEA identifies Robinson as CEO of its fiscal sponsor too.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-evusa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Zachary Robinson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Zachary Robinson",
            "targetName": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "CEA's press kit identifies EV USA as its fiscal sponsor.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-evusa-cea"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fiscal sponsor",
            "sourceName": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
            "targetName": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-robinson",
      "label": "Zachary Robinson",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "CEO of CEA and its US fiscal sponsor; previously Open Philanthropy chief of staff.",
      "roles": [
        "Leadership bridge between funder and community institution"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-robinson",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-robinson",
        "name": "Zachary Robinson",
        "role": "Leadership bridge between funder and community institution",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "CEO of CEA and its US fiscal sponsor; previously Open Philanthropy chief of staff.",
        "why": "He connects organizational scaling and grantmaking experience at a major funder to leadership of EA community infrastructure.",
        "about": [
          "CEA dates his appointment to February 2024. His previous Open Philanthropy responsibilities included communications, grantmaking teams, organization-wide policies and identifying Global Health and Wellbeing causes. These are concrete professional roles spanning the funder and the community institution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "CEO of CEA and its US fiscal sponsor; previously Open Philanthropy chief of staff.",
        "structuralRole": "Leadership bridge between funder and community institution",
        "significance": "He connects organizational scaling and grantmaking experience at a major funder to leadership of EA community infrastructure.",
        "background": [
          "CEA dates his appointment to February 2024. His previous Open Philanthropy responsibilities included communications, grantmaking teams, organization-wide policies and identifying Global Health and Wellbeing causes. These are concrete professional roles spanning the funder and the community institution."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "CEA dates his appointment to February 2024. His previous Open Philanthropy responsibilities included communications, grantmaking teams, organization-wide policies and identifying Global Health and Wellbeing causes. These are concrete professional roles spanning the funder and the community institution.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-cea",
              "w46-e-robinson-evusa",
              "w46-e-robinson-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "His prior responsibilities included communications, grantmaking teams and organization-wide policies.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former chief of staff at Open Philanthropy",
            "sourceName": "Zachary Robinson",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CEA identifies Robinson as CEO of its fiscal sponsor too.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-evusa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Zachary Robinson",
            "targetName": "Effective Ventures Foundation USA",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "CEA records Robinson's appointment.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-robinson-cea"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CEA press kit",
                "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO since February 2024",
            "sourceName": "Zachary Robinson",
            "targetName": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
            "heading": "The people connecting the arrangements",
            "text": "A further leadership bridge is Zachary Robinson : CEA CEO, CEO of its US fiscal sponsor, and previously Open Philanthropy chief of staff. His earlier work included communications, grantmaking teams and organizational policies.",
            "matched": [
              "Zachary Robinson"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "65270870d8a9850f9249acff9fb312ad4e2daf71b02b335dd68fb20ff4de8f05"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CEA press kit",
            "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-80k",
      "label": "80,000 Hours",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "An EA-associated careers organization combining media, personal advice, recruitment and a job board, now focused on advanced AI.",
      "roles": [
        "Audience-to-career recruitment"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "80000 Hours",
        "80k"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-80k",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-80k",
        "name": "80,000 Hours",
        "role": "Audience-to-career recruitment",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "An EA-associated careers organization combining media, personal advice, recruitment and a job board, now focused on advanced AI.",
        "why": "Its communications and career services can convert interest in AI risk into staffed institutions.",
        "about": [
          "Its strategy joins articles, podcasts, video, marketing, one-to-one advice, headhunting and job listings. A September 17, 2026 interview with Coefficient Giving grantmaker Max Nadeau recruits prospective AI-safety nonprofit founders. The episode explicitly discloses Coefficient as its largest donor and says Max's team has not directly funded it."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "80000 Hours",
          "80k"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our strategy at 80,000 Hours",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/2026/05/our-strategy-at-80000-hours/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "An EA-associated careers organization combining media, personal advice, recruitment and a job board, now focused on advanced AI.",
        "structuralRole": "Audience-to-career recruitment",
        "significance": "Its communications and career services can convert interest in AI risk into staffed institutions.",
        "background": [
          "Its strategy joins articles, podcasts, video, marketing, one-to-one advice, headhunting and job listings. A September 17, 2026 interview with Coefficient Giving grantmaker Max Nadeau recruits prospective AI-safety nonprofit founders. The episode explicitly discloses Coefficient as its largest donor and says Max's team has not directly funded it."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Its strategy joins articles, podcasts, video, marketing, one-to-one advice, headhunting and job listings. A September 17, 2026 interview with Coefficient Giving grantmaker Max Nadeau recruits prospective AI-safety nonprofit founders. The episode explicitly discloses Coefficient as its largest donor and says Max's team has not directly funded it.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Our strategy at 80,000 Hours",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/2026/05/our-strategy-at-80000-hours/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-80k",
              "w46-e-80k-tailwind",
              "w46-e-80k-nadeau"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The September 17 podcast identifies Coefficient Giving as 80,000 Hours' largest donor; the host says Max Nadeau's team has not directly funded it.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-80k"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Largest donor, disclosed by recipient",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "80,000 Hours",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "80,000 Hours publishes its interview with Nadeau on recruiting founders and funding ambitious AI-safety organizations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-80k-nadeau"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Nadeau",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Interviews grantmaker on new nonprofits",
            "sourceName": "80,000 Hours",
            "targetName": "Max Nadeau",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The September 17 episode presents Coefficient's funding opportunities to prospective founders and discusses Tailwind.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-80k-tailwind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Tailwind",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Promotes founder funding in podcast",
            "sourceName": "80,000 Hours",
            "targetName": "Project Tailwind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Harms attributes two grantees’ initial approaches to his podcast appearance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-80k-harms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Podcast led to applicant contacts",
            "sourceName": "80,000 Hours",
            "targetName": "Max Harms",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "A disclosed recruitment circuit",
            "text": "80,000 Hours' strategy combines media and marketing with personal advice, a job board and headhunting. Its current focus is helping advanced AI go well. The organization is trying to turn attention into careers.",
            "matched": [
              "80,000 Hours"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "16c44a35ab0650ab48764d548238be00ac678f9524ab856246c75188c550d8a3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our strategy at 80,000 Hours",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/2026/05/our-strategy-at-80000-hours/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-tailwind",
      "label": "Project Tailwind",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Coefficient Giving initiative to find and finance founders of new AI-safety organizations.",
      "roles": [
        "New-organization funding programme"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-tailwind",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-tailwind",
        "name": "Project Tailwind",
        "role": "New-organization funding programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Coefficient Giving initiative to find and finance founders of new AI-safety organizations.",
        "why": "The funder is actively helping create additional institutions, alongside financing established ones.",
        "about": [
          "Coefficient announced Tailwind on September 9, 2026, crediting Ryan Fugate with leading it. It targets prospective founders, including people at frontier AI companies. The subsequent 80,000 Hours interview explains opportunities for large projects and independent assessments of lab safety claims."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Coefficient Giving initiative to find and finance founders of new AI-safety organizations.",
        "structuralRole": "New-organization funding programme",
        "significance": "The funder is actively helping create additional institutions, alongside financing established ones.",
        "background": [
          "Coefficient announced Tailwind on September 9, 2026, crediting Ryan Fugate with leading it. It targets prospective founders, including people at frontier AI companies. The subsequent 80,000 Hours interview explains opportunities for large projects and independent assessments of lab safety claims."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Coefficient announced Tailwind on September 9, 2026, crediting Ryan Fugate with leading it. It targets prospective founders, including people at frontier AI companies. The subsequent 80,000 Hours interview explains opportunities for large projects and independent assessments of lab safety claims.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
              "w46-e-80k-tailwind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "How applicants can grow",
            "text": "Published ranges progress from $200k–$2m exploration to $2m–$20m seed support and $20m–$200m-plus scale awards. Unincorporated teams can seek early support; later stages need an entity or fiscal sponsor. Some charitable-purpose PBC proposals may qualify.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Project Tailwind: Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/tailwind/faqs/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "The September 17 episode presents Coefficient's funding opportunities to prospective founders and discusses Tailwind.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-80k-tailwind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "80,000 Hours",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Promotes founder funding in podcast",
            "sourceName": "80,000 Hours",
            "targetName": "Project Tailwind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Coefficient launches Project Tailwind to find and finance founders of ambitious AI-safety initiatives.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Launches nonprofit-founder initiative",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Project Tailwind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "The capital is accelerating",
            "text": "The same update announces Project Tailwind to recruit and fund new founders. Concrete examples show the scale: $160 million approved for Resolution, more than $70 million over two years recommended for Redwood Research, and a $68 million three-year renewal recommendation for Epoch AI. Research capacity, measurements and new institutions are being built with this money.",
            "matched": [
              "Project Tailwind"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5893d4ce8995b5c5e30b5482036432dd787bf69d24a4d62acc66cf5236a429d2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Project Tailwind: Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/tailwind/faqs/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-nadeau",
      "label": "Max Nadeau",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Coefficient Giving technical AI-safety grantmaker interviewed by 80,000 Hours about new nonprofit founders.",
      "roles": [
        "Grantmaker and public recruiter"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-nadeau",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-nadeau",
        "name": "Max Nadeau",
        "role": "Grantmaker and public recruiter",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Coefficient Giving technical AI-safety grantmaker interviewed by 80,000 Hours about new nonprofit founders.",
        "why": "He makes the connection between the donor programme and the careers-media audience concrete.",
        "about": [
          "In the September 17 episode, recorded August 18, Nadeau describes the work Coefficient wants to finance and how ambitious founders can approach it. His account links research funding to the practical objective of changing decisions about powerful AI."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Coefficient Giving technical AI-safety grantmaker interviewed by 80,000 Hours about new nonprofit founders.",
        "structuralRole": "Grantmaker and public recruiter",
        "significance": "He makes the connection between the donor programme and the careers-media audience concrete.",
        "background": [
          "In the September 17 episode, recorded August 18, Nadeau describes the work Coefficient wants to finance and how ambitious founders can approach it. His account links research funding to the practical objective of changing decisions about powerful AI."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "In the September 17 episode, recorded August 18, Nadeau describes the work Coefficient wants to finance and how ambitious founders can approach it. His account links research funding to the practical objective of changing decisions about powerful AI.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-80k-nadeau",
              "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "80,000 Hours publishes its interview with Nadeau on recruiting founders and funding ambitious AI-safety organizations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-80k-nadeau"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "80,000 Hours",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Interviews grantmaker on new nonprofits",
            "sourceName": "80,000 Hours",
            "targetName": "Max Nadeau",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The interview identifies his role and funding work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
                "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Technical AI-safety grantmaker",
            "sourceName": "Max Nadeau",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "A disclosed recruitment circuit",
            "text": "On September 17, it published an interview with Coefficient grantmaker Max Nadeau about founding AI-safety nonprofits. The episode discloses Coefficient as its largest donor, while specifying that Nadeau's team has not directly funded it. The recording was made on August 18.",
            "matched": [
              "Max Nadeau",
              "Nadeau"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a99a5ae122dea07741c7261d8b95ccf35b291153d76ed8d962fdae609842f3be"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
            "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-oehlsen",
      "label": "Emily Oehlsen",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Leader of Coefficient Giving's AI and biosecurity grantmaking since March 2025.",
      "roles": [
        "Grantmaking leadership"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-oehlsen",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-oehlsen",
        "name": "Emily Oehlsen",
        "role": "Grantmaking leadership",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Leader of Coefficient Giving's AI and biosecurity grantmaking since March 2025.",
        "why": "She explains the scale, accelerated approvals and institution-building strategy behind the current funding expansion.",
        "about": [
          "Her September 9 update says technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding recommendations grew from $168 million in 2024 to $351 million in 2025, with over $1 billion projected for 2026. Coefficient calls these commitments but defines them as formally recommended funding."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Leader of Coefficient Giving's AI and biosecurity grantmaking since March 2025.",
        "structuralRole": "Grantmaking leadership",
        "significance": "She explains the scale, accelerated approvals and institution-building strategy behind the current funding expansion.",
        "background": [
          "Her September 9 update says technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding recommendations grew from $168 million in 2024 to $351 million in 2025, with over $1 billion projected for 2026. Coefficient calls these commitments but defines them as formally recommended funding."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Her September 9 update says technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding recommendations grew from $168 million in 2024 to $351 million in 2025, with over $1 billion projected for 2026. Coefficient calls these commitments but defines them as formally recommended funding.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-oehlsen-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Oehlsen dates her move to the Global Catastrophic Risks side to March 2025.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-oehlsen-coefficient"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Leads AI and biosecurity grantmaking",
            "sourceName": "Emily Oehlsen",
            "targetName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-resolution",
      "label": "Resolution",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "New AI-alignment research organization led by Geoffrey Irving and backed by a major Coefficient approval.",
      "roles": [
        "New research institution"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-resolution",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-resolution",
        "name": "Resolution",
        "role": "New research institution",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "New AI-alignment research organization led by Geoffrey Irving and backed by a major Coefficient approval.",
        "why": "It is a concrete example of large philanthropic funding creating an institution.",
        "about": [
          "Coefficient's September 9 update reports approval of $160 million for Resolution, describing it as its largest AI-safety grant. The stated purpose is scaling rigorous alignment research. Approval is the recorded transaction stage; the statement is not a payment ledger."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "New AI-alignment research organization led by Geoffrey Irving and backed by a major Coefficient approval.",
        "structuralRole": "New research institution",
        "significance": "It is a concrete example of large philanthropic funding creating an institution.",
        "background": [
          "Coefficient's September 9 update reports approval of $160 million for Resolution, describing it as its largest AI-safety grant. The stated purpose is scaling rigorous alignment research. Approval is the recorded transaction stage; the statement is not a payment ledger."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Coefficient's September 9 update reports approval of $160 million for Resolution, describing it as its largest AI-safety grant. The stated purpose is scaling rigorous alignment research. Approval is the recorded transaction stage; the statement is not a payment ledger.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Resources and research choices",
            "text": "Its Coefficient award combines base and conditional support. OpenAI credits add a separate research resource. The Agent Foundations team brings both a research tradition and explicit concerns about automation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolution: $160m grant and its conditions",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/funding"
              },
              {
                "title": "OpenAI grants Resolution $10m in API credits",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
              "w48-cap-e-openai-resolution",
              "w48-cap-e-resolution-team"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Resolution describes a $160m award with a conditional component tied to hiring and compute needs; the base includes regranting.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Resolution: $160m grant and its conditions",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/funding"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$108m base + $52m conditional",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Resolution",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Resolution announced OpenAI-provided credits for research including autoformalization.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-openai-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "OpenAI grants Resolution $10m in API credits",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$10m in API credits",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Resolution",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The group announced it was joining Resolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-resolution-team"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolution Agent Foundations team",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosts Agent Foundations team",
            "sourceName": "Resolution",
            "targetName": "Resolution Agent Foundations team",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Irving lists his current leadership role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder and chief scientist",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "targetName": "Resolution",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "The capital is accelerating",
            "text": "The same update announces Project Tailwind to recruit and fund new founders. Concrete examples show the scale: $160 million approved for Resolution, more than $70 million over two years recommended for Redwood Research, and a $68 million three-year renewal recommendation for Epoch AI. Research capacity, measurements and new institutions are being built with this money.",
            "matched": [
              "Resolution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5893d4ce8995b5c5e30b5482036432dd787bf69d24a4d62acc66cf5236a429d2"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence",
            "heading": "The conditions behind the money",
            "text": "Resolution’s announcement divides its $160m Coefficient award into a $108m base and $52m conditional on hiring success and compute needs. The base also supports some onward grants. Those conditions connect institutional growth to the release of resources; the announcement does not disclose the detailed milestones or payment schedule.",
            "matched": [
              "Resolution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "76f35a0060e436ffb1306b8e41adb03a95f62883f6b9204f494f4da65a9e92aa"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence",
            "heading": "Shared funding does not settle the strategy",
            "text": "Resolution’s new Agent Foundations team openly carries forward a MIRI-adjacent research tradition. Jeremy Gillen’s joining statement also questions whether some research automation could accelerate dangerous capabilities. He explicitly withholds blanket endorsement of the organization’s other work. A well-financed institution can contain a real dispute over what progress should mean.",
            "matched": [
              "Resolution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "37adb446aeb229165d4344e9ff7e5cfa386541cbb6e8cc04796be04ec166691d"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
            "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified",
            "heading": "Version custody keeps the date question honest",
            "text": "These are related publisher versions, not four independent confirmations. The media API also lists a second May2025 file (media1409), which was discovered but not fetched. No earlier-membership names or resolution establishing who replaced or joined the sole member were recovered. The decisive date gap is the adopted text and resolutions effective6July2023 , not whether a file with 2023 in its name exists.",
            "matched": [
              "Resolution"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0b160f1804241767443e42eaf46bb16b0b43acc5f153d493cc3c5ba9d9a9a34e"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolution: $160m grant and its conditions",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/funding"
          },
          {
            "title": "OpenAI grants Resolution $10m in API credits",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
            "url": "https://naml.us/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-redwood",
      "label": "Redwood Research",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Technical AI-safety research organization associated with work on AI control and alignment faking.",
      "roles": [
        "Technical research grantee"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-redwood",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-redwood",
        "name": "Redwood Research",
        "role": "Technical research grantee",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Technical AI-safety research organization associated with work on AI control and alignment faking.",
        "why": "It connects a major grantmaker to research that helps define the public and institutional understanding of AI risk.",
        "about": [
          "Coefficient reports recommending more than $70 million over two years for Redwood's expansion. Its update identifies Ryan Greenblatt as chief scientist and cites his independent investigation work. The amount is a funding recommendation, not a cash receipt."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Technical AI-safety research organization associated with work on AI control and alignment faking.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical research grantee",
        "significance": "It connects a major grantmaker to research that helps define the public and institutional understanding of AI risk.",
        "background": [
          "Coefficient reports recommending more than $70 million over two years for Redwood's expansion. Its update identifies Ryan Greenblatt as chief scientist and cites his independent investigation work. The amount is a funding recommendation, not a cash receipt."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Coefficient reports recommending more than $70 million over two years for Redwood's expansion. Its update identifies Ryan Greenblatt as chief scientist and cites his independent investigation work. The amount is a funding recommendation, not a cash receipt.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-redwood"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "From research to advice",
            "text": "Redwood identifies DeepMind and Anthropic advisory work and a UK AISI collaboration on an AI control safety-case sketch. The underlying adoption and commercial terms require further records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
                "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-deepmind",
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-anthropic",
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Redwood identifies UK AISI as partner on a published safety-case sketch.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
                "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Joint AI control safety-case work",
            "sourceName": "Redwood Research",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient reports a recommendation supporting Redwood's expansion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-redwood"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Over $70m recommended / two years",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Redwood Research",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Redwood identifies Anthropic among its advisory relationships.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
                "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advises on misalignment risk",
            "sourceName": "Redwood Research",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Redwood identifies DeepMind among its advisory relationships.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-redwood-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
                "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DeepMind",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advises on misalignment risk",
            "sourceName": "Redwood Research",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Moskovitz names Redwood among organizations they fund.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-redwood"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
                "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "status": "reported",
            "label": "Publicly states support",
            "sourceName": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "targetName": "Redwood Research",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
            "heading": "The capital is accelerating",
            "text": "The same update announces Project Tailwind to recruit and fund new founders. Concrete examples show the scale: $160 million approved for Resolution, more than $70 million over two years recommended for Redwood Research, and a $68 million three-year renewal recommendation for Epoch AI. Research capacity, measurements and new institutions are being built with this money.",
            "matched": [
              "Redwood Research"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5893d4ce8995b5c5e30b5482036432dd787bf69d24a4d62acc66cf5236a429d2"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
            "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
            "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-epoch",
      "label": "Epoch AI",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Research organization measuring AI progress through data, benchmarks and economic analysis.",
      "roles": [
        "AI measurement and research grantee"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-epoch",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-epoch",
        "name": "Epoch AI",
        "role": "AI measurement and research grantee",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Research organization measuring AI progress through data, benchmarks and economic analysis.",
        "why": "Its measurements inform the environment in which AI-policy and philanthropic priorities are set.",
        "about": [
          "Coefficient reports a $68 million renewal recommendation over three years, supporting a roughly threefold capacity expansion and new economics work. The announcement gives a specific money-to-research-capacity connection."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Research organization measuring AI progress through data, benchmarks and economic analysis.",
        "structuralRole": "AI measurement and research grantee",
        "significance": "Its measurements inform the environment in which AI-policy and philanthropic priorities are set.",
        "background": [
          "Coefficient reports a $68 million renewal recommendation over three years, supporting a roughly threefold capacity expansion and new economics work. The announcement gives a specific money-to-research-capacity connection."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Coefficient reports a $68 million renewal recommendation over three years, supporting a roughly threefold capacity expansion and new economics work. The announcement gives a specific money-to-research-capacity connection.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-epoch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Resources and independence",
            "text": "Epoch discloses consulting, an editorial-independence policy and investments in semiconductor and AI stocks. Its public data-center explorer makes one funded output inspectable.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              },
              {
                "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-cg-epoch-tracker",
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-tracker",
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-eu",
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient reports a renewal recommendation supporting Epoch's capacity, benchmarks, data and economics work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-epoch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
                "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$68m recommended / three years",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Epoch AI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Epoch reports Coefficient support for its Public Data Center Tracker.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-cg-epoch-tracker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$2.74m: data-center tracker",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Epoch AI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Epoch discloses evaluation on FrontierMath.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DeepMind",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2026 co-mathematician evaluation",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Epoch lists collaborative benchmark work.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-metr"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "METR",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2025 software-engineering benchmark",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "METR",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Epoch announced expanded global coverage.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-tracker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Epoch AI Data Centers explorer",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Builds and publishes explorer",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "Epoch AI Data Centers explorer",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Epoch discloses this engagement.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-eu"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European AI Office",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2026 technical consultations",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "European AI Office",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Epoch lists both projects.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-openai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "2026 FrontierMath audit and verifier",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
            "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency"
          },
          {
            "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
            "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-egc",
      "label": "Effective Giving and Careers",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Coefficient Giving programme supporting donation infrastructure, career development and policy talent.",
      "roles": [
        "Funder of influence-enabling institutions"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-egc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-egc",
        "name": "Effective Giving and Careers",
        "role": "Funder of influence-enabling institutions",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Coefficient Giving programme supporting donation infrastructure, career development and policy talent.",
        "why": "It finances some of the organizations through which people enter public-policy work.",
        "about": [
          "The programme names NEED, Impactful Policy Careers, Global Policy Research Group and Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network among policy-talent recipients. These named pathways span global development and animal welfare; their work should be understood through the actual programme mandates."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Coefficient Giving programme supporting donation infrastructure, career development and policy talent.",
        "structuralRole": "Funder of influence-enabling institutions",
        "significance": "It finances some of the organizations through which people enter public-policy work.",
        "background": [
          "The programme names NEED, Impactful Policy Careers, Global Policy Research Group and Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network among policy-talent recipients. These named pathways span global development and animal welfare; their work should be understood through the actual programme mandates."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The programme names NEED, Impactful Policy Careers, Global Policy Research Group and Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network among policy-talent recipients. These named pathways span global development and animal welfare; their work should be understood through the actual programme mandates.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-egc",
              "w46-e-egc-need",
              "w46-e-egc-ipc",
              "w46-e-egc-gprg",
              "w46-e-egc-renaissance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient names Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network for support to policy entrepreneurs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-renaissance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Renaissance Philanthropy",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supports PEN policy network",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Renaissance Philanthropy",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient names GPRG among its new policy-talent grants and describes this function.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-gprg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Global Policy Research Group",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supports consultation-response coordination",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Global Policy Research Group",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Programme update names Impactful Policy Careers in its policy-talent support.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-ipc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              },
              {
                "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
                "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Impactful Policy Careers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Funds policy-career accelerator",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Impactful Policy Careers",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient's programme update lists NEED as a policy-talent grantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names policy-talent support",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Programme update describes expansion and new policy-talent grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-egc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Runs giving and careers programme",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "heading": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "text": "Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names a set of policy-talent recipients. They reveal a second way money becomes institutional influence: financing people's preparation for, entry into and participation in public-policy work.",
            "matched": [
              "Effective Giving and Careers"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "3d963becfe7c96ce78bcd43eff1198b449e9eac303bf37da71a1717315563e15"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
            "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-need",
      "label": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Student network supporting entry into international-development policy careers.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy-career recruitment and internships"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "NEED"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-need",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-need",
        "name": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
        "role": "Policy-career recruitment and internships",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Student network supporting entry into international-development policy careers.",
        "why": "Its funding disclosure exposes a foundation-adviser-recipient chain.",
        "about": [
          "NEED advertises internships, connections and recruiting channels for students interested in international development. It says its funding is a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The recommendation and the foundation grant are two roles in one disclosed funding arrangement."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "NEED"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Student network supporting entry into international-development policy careers.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy-career recruitment and internships",
        "significance": "Its funding disclosure exposes a foundation-adviser-recipient chain.",
        "background": [
          "NEED advertises internships, connections and recruiting channels for students interested in international development. It says its funding is a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The recommendation and the foundation grant are two roles in one disclosed funding arrangement."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "NEED advertises internships, connections and recruiting channels for students interested in international development. It says its funding is a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The recommendation and the foundation grant are two roles in one disclosed funding arrangement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
                "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-need",
              "w46-e-coefficient-need",
              "w46-e-svcf-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NEED identifies Coefficient as recommending the grant it receives through SVCF.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-coefficient-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
                "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Recommends foundation grant",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "NEED identifies Silicon Valley Community Foundation as the grant source.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-svcf-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
                "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Grant disclosed by recipient",
            "sourceName": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "targetName": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient's programme update lists NEED as a policy-talent grantee.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-need"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names policy-talent support",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "heading": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "text": "NEED supports student routes into international-development careers. Its funding disclosure names a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The map records the grantor and adviser separately: those are two roles in the same disclosed arrangement.",
            "matched": [
              "NEED"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a737fb73f8d1c13933d2c4c80c552313ce2e1317166b5035ab9da990683a247e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "w34-sanders-findings",
            "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
            "heading": "Expert access has a history",
            "text": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California · The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation · Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI · Our people",
            "matched": [
              "NEED"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "a37ea3aa3818f538ae09963994a5f93c249c0e05166cba1c7ae8eb7d2e717f18"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
            "heading": "Material gaps and explanatory limits",
            "text": "The professional path before Conjecture is only partly supported by accessible primary sources. BCW and full education dates need direct employer/university/profile evidence; no inference about any government or political party follows from study or research assistance. The exact dates and terms of Conjecture employment/advisory work, share ownership, compensation and any continuing decision authority are unknown.",
            "matched": [
              "NEED"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "d6ef1c81b84ca76ce492fcc45d83c63adf2857acef3a27db167307bf375b294e"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings",
            "title": "Membership and US tax-return seam — 8 September 2026",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The new public record is ICMEC US's signed 2023 Form 990, recovered from the live US annual-financial index. It supplies a specific inter-entity transaction category and a tax-return characterization that need reconciliation. It does not reveal who joined the Australian company, what resolution took effect on 6 July 2023, or donor reserved rights. Those membership questions have reached a bounded public-record frontier.",
            "matched": [
              "NEED"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "fdbc2c0e7110c0cb31671c7529e8cb744667e635b9e7940724ab58658da1e670"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "url": "https://www.need-network.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-ipc",
      "label": "Impactful Policy Careers",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Accelerator for people pursuing European policy careers in global health and animal welfare.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy training and placement support"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "IPC"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-ipc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-ipc",
        "name": "Impactful Policy Careers",
        "role": "Policy training and placement support",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Accelerator for people pursuing European policy careers in global health and animal welfare.",
        "why": "It pays for preparation, mentoring and access that can help participants enter policy roles.",
        "about": [
          "The programme advertises an expenses-covered Brussels training week, mentoring and peer networks. Its two annual cohorts focus on global health/development and animal welfare/food policy. Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names it as a policy-talent grantee."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "IPC"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
            "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Accelerator for people pursuing European policy careers in global health and animal welfare.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy training and placement support",
        "significance": "It pays for preparation, mentoring and access that can help participants enter policy roles.",
        "background": [
          "The programme advertises an expenses-covered Brussels training week, mentoring and peer networks. Its two annual cohorts focus on global health/development and animal welfare/food policy. Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names it as a policy-talent grantee."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The programme advertises an expenses-covered Brussels training week, mentoring and peer networks. Its two annual cohorts focus on global health/development and animal welfare/food policy. Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names it as a policy-talent grantee.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
                "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-ipc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Programme update names Impactful Policy Careers in its policy-talent support.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-ipc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              },
              {
                "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
                "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Funds policy-career accelerator",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Impactful Policy Careers",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "heading": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
            "text": "Impactful Policy Careers offers an expenses-covered Brussels training week, mentoring and a peer network. Its cohorts cover global health/development and animal welfare/food policy. Coefficient also names Global Policy Research Group's consultation coordination and Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network for policy entrepreneurs.",
            "matched": [
              "Impactful Policy Careers"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4e5b3de93b256642bab1214a484155deb54039b22678cbc94ec46086f31f7385"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
            "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-gprg",
      "label": "Global Policy Research Group",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Policy organization named in Coefficient's careers-programme update for coordinating consultation responses.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy participation intermediary"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "GPRG"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-gprg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-gprg",
        "name": "Global Policy Research Group",
        "role": "Policy participation intermediary",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Policy organization named in Coefficient's careers-programme update for coordinating consultation responses.",
        "why": "It connects funded research capacity to the formal channels where governments solicit policy input.",
        "about": [
          "Coefficient describes supporting Global Policy Research Group to coordinate consultation responses. This pass establishes the funder's reported relationship; the next useful records are the actual submissions and official responses to them."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "GPRG"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Policy organization named in Coefficient's careers-programme update for coordinating consultation responses.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy participation intermediary",
        "significance": "It connects funded research capacity to the formal channels where governments solicit policy input.",
        "background": [
          "Coefficient describes supporting Global Policy Research Group to coordinate consultation responses. This pass establishes the funder's reported relationship; the next useful records are the actual submissions and official responses to them."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Coefficient describes supporting Global Policy Research Group to coordinate consultation responses. This pass establishes the funder's reported relationship; the next useful records are the actual submissions and official responses to them.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-gprg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient names GPRG among its new policy-talent grants and describes this function.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-gprg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supports consultation-response coordination",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Global Policy Research Group",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-renaissance",
      "label": "Renaissance Philanthropy",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Philanthropic organization whose PEN network is named as a recipient in Coefficient's policy-talent programme.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy-entrepreneur funding intermediary"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w46-renaissance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-renaissance",
        "name": "Renaissance Philanthropy",
        "role": "Policy-entrepreneur funding intermediary",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Philanthropic organization whose PEN network is named as a recipient in Coefficient's policy-talent programme.",
        "why": "It extends the funded policy-career network beyond individual training programmes.",
        "about": [
          "Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network in its policy-talent grants. The described function is flexible support for policy entrepreneurs. Recipient-level award terms and subsequent outputs remain the next records to obtain."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Philanthropic organization whose PEN network is named as a recipient in Coefficient's policy-talent programme.",
        "structuralRole": "Policy-entrepreneur funding intermediary",
        "significance": "It extends the funded policy-career network beyond individual training programmes.",
        "background": [
          "Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network in its policy-talent grants. The described function is flexible support for policy entrepreneurs. Recipient-level award terms and subsequent outputs remain the next records to obtain."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update names Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network in its policy-talent grants. The described function is flexible support for policy entrepreneurs. Recipient-level award terms and subsequent outputs remain the next records to obtain.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-renaissance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Coefficient names Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network for support to policy entrepreneurs.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w46-e-egc-renaissance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
                "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supports PEN policy network",
            "sourceName": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "targetName": "Renaissance Philanthropy",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
            "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "AI security supplier connecting philanthropic funding, venture capital and testing inside frontier labs.",
      "roles": [
        "Evaluation supplier and security-standard developer"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Irregular",
        "Pattern Labs"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-irregular",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-irregular",
        "name": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
        "role": "Evaluation supplier and security-standard developer",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI security supplier connecting philanthropic funding, venture capital and testing inside frontier labs.",
        "why": "Its tests and advice help determine how powerful AI is judged; failures in its testing environment have themselves become policy-relevant incidents.",
        "about": [
          "Founded by Dan Lahav and Omer Nevo, Irregular was formerly Pattern Labs. A 2024 Good Ventures entry records a $6.8m grant recommended by Open Philanthropy. The company later announced $80m raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. It works with frontier labs on security evaluations and defenses. After its 2026 containment failures, it proposed industry guidance while OpenAI affirmed the continuing partnership."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Irregular",
          "Pattern Labs"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
            "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          },
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
          "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI-security company funded by philanthropy and venture capital and hired by the UK government to help design and run AI evaluations.",
        "structuralRole": "Evaluator, government test designer and commercial security supplier",
        "significance": "Its influence reaches the choice of what to measure, alongside research partnerships and a business selling AI-security expertise.",
        "background": [
          "Founded by Dan Lahav and Omer Nevo, Irregular was formerly Pattern Labs. A 2024 Good Ventures entry records a $6.8m grant recommended by Open Philanthropy. The company later announced $80m raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. It works with frontier labs on security evaluations and defenses. After its 2026 containment failures, it proposed industry guidance while OpenAI affirmed the continuing partnership."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Founded by Dan Lahav and Omer Nevo, Irregular was formerly Pattern Labs. A 2024 Good Ventures entry records a $6.8m grant recommended by Open Philanthropy. The company later announced $80m raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. It works with frontier labs on security evaluations and defenses. After its 2026 containment failures, it proposed industry guidance while OpenAI affirmed the continuing partnership.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
                "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              },
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
                "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-gv-grant",
              "w47-e-cg-recommendation",
              "w47-e-sequoia-investment",
              "w47-e-redpoint-investment",
              "w47-e-lahav-irregular",
              "w47-e-omer-irregular",
              "w47-e-irregular-openai",
              "w47-e-irregular-anthropic",
              "w47-e-irregular-deepmind",
              "w47-e-irregular-meta",
              "w47-e-irregular-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
              "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Research and commercial interests",
            "text": "A co-authored AI-security agenda discloses that its recommendations could expand Irregular’s market. RAND describes an independent conflict-aware review process.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-irregular"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-security-research-and-the-market-it-proposes-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Government contracts reveal the arrangement",
            "text": "The UK records a February 2024 cyber/advisory award corrected to £293,151 and a September 2024 safeguards award of £459,875. The latter keeps final publication approval with the government while allowing Irregular to retain know-how and commercialize related evaluation products.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The commercial strategy is explicit",
            "text": "In a Sequoia interview, CEO Dan Lahav explains why the company works closely with frontier labs: early exposure helps it prepare security products for the problems other businesses will meet later. Irregular’s privacy policy also describes a subscription service using API calls.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing the AI Frontier: Irregular Co-founder Dan Lahav",
                "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav"
              },
              {
                "title": "Privacy Policy",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/privacy-policy"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The philanthropic money was reported paid",
            "text": "Good Ventures reports the full $6.8 million Pattern Labs award paid in two instalments: $4,533,333 on 5 March 2024 and $2,266,667 on 4 February 2025. Its filings identify a 15 March 2025 grantee report and $2,639,613 expended. The grant agreement and report body remain unavailable.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
              },
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A third UK contract buys evaluation design",
            "text": "A distinct £459,000 award commissions priority-capability research, test design, justification of coverage and advice on other DSIT work. The buyer retains approval and publication authority; the supplier retains commercially reusable IP and know-how.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
              },
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "A place in the safety-framework discussion",
            "text": "Pattern Labs is named in the government’s invitation-related disclosure for the closed November 2024 Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference. Open Philanthropy is also named. The organizers are UK AISI and GovAI.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Order form names Pattern Labs Tech Inc. Special Term 1 retains supplier know-how and permits commercialization of related evaluation products.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-safeguards-contractor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hires research team; reserves reuse rights",
            "sourceName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The contract names Pattern Labs Tech Inc.; it reserves background IP and know-how and allows related commercial evaluation products.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-supplier"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissions design; preserves commercial reuse",
            "sourceName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "DSIT April 2025 spending ledger records transaction 668259 to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. under AISI consultancy expenditure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-recorded-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSIT spending over GBP25000: April2025",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/69735d123f2908a34904059e/dsit-spending-over-25000-april-2025.csv"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Records £153,000 consultancy payment",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "The foundation’s expenditure-responsibility statement dates this instalment of the $6.8 million Pattern Labs award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-gv-first-payment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
              },
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Reports $4,533,333 grant payment",
            "sourceName": "Good Ventures",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Pattern Labs appears in the organization list disclosed in response to questions about invitations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-irregular-invited"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named in invitation disclosure",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Good Ventures records a Pattern Labs grantee report dated 15 March 2025 and $2,639,613 expended.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-grantee-report"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
              },
              {
                "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
                "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Good Ventures",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Grantee report dated 15 March 2025",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Good Ventures",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Anthropic identifies Irregular as the evaluation partner involved in the July disclosure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-irregular-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Investigating three incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Cyber-evaluation supplier",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The award identifies Pattern Labs Tech Inc., the legal name disclosed by Irregular.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-cyber-contractor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Best Practices for Evaluations and Evaluation Suites: Part 1",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names Pattern Labs as supplier",
            "sourceName": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "Philanthropic money before the venture announcement",
            "text": "The company’s later launch announcement explicitly identifies Irregular as the former Pattern Labs and announces $80 million raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. The name change is publicly acknowledged. The earlier grant’s old live URL now redirects to Good Ventures’ giving overview; the historical entry is available in the archive.",
            "matched": [
              "Pattern Labs",
              "Irregular"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7b1860902e8b0bf9a78e3e6ebbb20e2cb7c062e2a390283826b3697c609d6bb3"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19",
            "title": "AI incidents: what the tests actually show",
            "heading": "Different incidents need different explanations",
            "text": "AP reports that Meta also hired Irregular and disclosed an internet-access misconfiguration. The map marks this relationship as reported from company statements. We have not acquired a standalone Meta postmortem.",
            "matched": [
              "Irregular"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "dab22441aa464846c197b149f91806b1868ec6416b312e50f5cd6e53e69f5769"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19",
            "title": "AI incidents: what the tests actually show",
            "heading": "The supplier helps write the response",
            "text": "Irregular’s August 14 account focuses on the shared domain-collision scenario, says it repaired access controls and outlines a white paper on evaluation practice. It also describes the practical pressure of complex tests and short delivery windows.",
            "matched": [
              "Irregular"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "4f4899c092cc6fdb2a82a1e72789fdaec13b9946a50a94f3a6f7eb4889b25b0c"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Dan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His current RAND role is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.",
            "matched": [
              "Irregular"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "942f07a64be9390da9984586306d70df22ae29cc109f6348c4597c47963ba776"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
            "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          },
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Investigating three incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals"
          },
          {
            "title": "Addressing Recent Incidents: Ongoing Findings and Path Forward",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward"
          },
          {
            "title": "Meta AI incident and Irregular statement",
            "url": "https://apnews.com/article/meta-ai-hacking-anthropic-irregular-openai-0e8061437da6779be962b24ac134a514"
          },
          {
            "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT spending over GBP25000: April2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/69735d123f2908a34904059e/dsit-spending-over-25000-april-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
            "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
          },
          {
            "title": "Agentic Self-Modification in Open-Weights Systems",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems"
          },
          {
            "title": "FrontierCyber: Bringing Offensive Cyber Evaluations to Real Systems",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Best Practices for Evaluations and Evaluation Suites: Part 1",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full"
          },
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing the AI Frontier: Irregular Co-founder Dan Lahav",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav"
          },
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          },
          {
            "id": "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19",
            "title": "AI incidents: what the tests actually show"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-lahav",
      "label": "Dan Lahav",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Irregular co-founder and CEO; co-founder of Impact Focused Education and co-author of RAND model-security research.",
      "roles": [
        "Bridge between security business, education and policy research"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-lahav",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-lahav",
        "name": "Dan Lahav",
        "role": "Bridge between security business, education and policy research",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Irregular co-founder and CEO; co-founder of Impact Focused Education and co-author of RAND model-security research.",
        "why": "He helps build both the commercial testing infrastructure and the educational and analytical frameworks around advanced AI.",
        "about": [
          "Lahav co-founded Irregular with Omer Nevo and Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. RAND lists him as a co-author of its 2024 model-weights security report. EA Funds lists one joint 2022 MOOC grant to Lahav and Sella Nevo. These are public professional and grant relationships across different institutions."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Irregular co-founder and CEO, connecting technical AI-security work, research partnerships and the company’s commercial strategy.",
        "structuralRole": "Technical founder and commercial strategist",
        "significance": "He describes privileged early laboratory access as preparation for security demand across other businesses.",
        "background": [
          "Lahav co-founded Irregular with Omer Nevo and Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. RAND lists him as a co-author of its 2024 model-weights security report. EA Funds lists one joint 2022 MOOC grant to Lahav and Sella Nevo. These are public professional and grant relationships across different institutions."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Lahav co-founded Irregular with Omer Nevo and Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. RAND lists him as a co-author of its 2024 model-weights security report. EA Funds lists one joint 2022 MOOC grant to Lahav and Sella Nevo. These are public professional and grant relationships across different institutions.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-irregular",
              "w47-e-lahav-ife",
              "w47-e-mooc-lahav",
              "w47-e-lahav-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Why the company starts inside labs",
            "text": "Lahav tells Sequoia that working with the first organizations facing frontier-model problems lets Irregular prepare for what general deployers will need six, twelve or twenty-four months later. This is a stated business strategy.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing the AI Frontier: Irregular Co-founder Dan Lahav",
                "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-founded the educational initiative.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-ife"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Impact Focused Education",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "Impact Focused Education",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Named author of the RAND publication.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Public founder and executive role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-irregular"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder / CEO",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint recipient in the ledger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-mooc-lahav"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named joint grantee",
            "sourceName": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "targetName": "Dan Lahav",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-author.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-lahav"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Dan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His current RAND role is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.",
            "matched": [
              "Dan Lahav",
              "Lahav"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "942f07a64be9390da9984586306d70df22ae29cc109f6348c4597c47963ba776"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "The education funding is specific too. EA Funds’ ledger , which returns CSV, lists one joint $394,968 grant to Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo in the third quarter of 2022 for an online course about pursuing high-impact work. It does not identify the course or receiving organization, so the map keeps the grant attached to its named recipients.",
            "matched": [
              "Dan Lahav",
              "Lahav"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a5e9743efb5b887ef30a3d9871b7eae428c05b5d1f2042aec41a5210881ea77"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "Early access is part of the business strategy",
            "text": "Dan Lahav explains the company’s approach directly in a Sequoia interview . Working inside frontier labs lets Irregular encounter problems before other businesses do, then prepare solutions for those later customers. Irregular’s privacy policy describes a subscription service receiving data through API calls.",
            "matched": [
              "Dan Lahav",
              "Lahav"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "ca7270c6e037ee85db324a87c21032724542232800904b517adbe02bae39a7e7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing the AI Frontier: Irregular Co-founder Dan Lahav",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-omer",
      "label": "Omer Nevo",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Irregular co-founder and CTO with board roles in EA Israel and Probably Good, and an advisory role at Heron.",
      "roles": [
        "Bridge between evaluation business and career infrastructure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-omer",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-omer",
        "name": "Omer Nevo",
        "role": "Bridge between evaluation business and career infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Irregular co-founder and CTO with board roles in EA Israel and Probably Good, and an advisory role at Heron.",
        "why": "His roles connect a commercial evaluator to institutions that help people enter impact-oriented and AI-security work.",
        "about": [
          "EA Israel lists Nevo on its board. Probably Good identifies him as a co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron names him as an adviser and identifies Irregular as his company. These positions make the bridge between technical work, recruitment and community institutions concrete."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
            "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Probably Good",
            "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Irregular co-founder and CTO with board roles in EA Israel and Probably Good, and an advisory role at Heron.",
        "structuralRole": "Bridge between evaluation business and career infrastructure",
        "significance": "His roles connect a commercial evaluator to institutions that help people enter impact-oriented and AI-security work.",
        "background": [
          "EA Israel lists Nevo on its board. Probably Good identifies him as a co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron names him as an adviser and identifies Irregular as his company. These positions make the bridge between technical work, recruitment and community institutions concrete."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "EA Israel lists Nevo on its board. Probably Good identifies him as a co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron names him as an adviser and identifies Irregular as his company. These positions make the bridge between technical work, recruitment and community institutions concrete.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
                "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-irregular",
              "w47-e-omer-israel",
              "w47-e-omer-heron",
              "w47-e-omer-pg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Name appears in the current board list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-israel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
                "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board member",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Public founder and executive role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-irregular"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder / CTO",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current director and former CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-pg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Probably Good",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder / director",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Probably Good",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Heron names Nevo as an adviser.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Heron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advisory board",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Heron",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-author.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-omer"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Omer Nevo is Irregular’s co-founder and CTO. EA Israel lists him on its board. Probably Good identifies him as its co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron lists him as an adviser, names EA Israel as its institutional host and discloses Coefficient Giving funding. Heron helps cybersecurity practitioners find opportunities in AI security.",
            "matched": [
              "Omer Nevo"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86cdc9d53fbe1d4a5b7d11590fff01b5a9344de3aa14b00f477a81c31ba63fb7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
            "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Probably Good",
            "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-sella",
      "label": "Sella Nevo",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "RAND AI-security research leader and co-founder of Probably Good and Impact Focused Education.",
      "roles": [
        "Research and career-institution builder"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-sella",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-sella",
        "name": "Sella Nevo",
        "role": "Research and career-institution builder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "RAND AI-security research leader and co-founder of Probably Good and Impact Focused Education.",
        "why": "He connects policy-facing security research to organizations developing people and educational programmes.",
        "about": [
          "RAND currently identifies Nevo as founding director of its Center on AI, Security, and Technology. He co-authored the model-weights security report with Lahav. Probably Good lists him as co-founder, former research head and director; Impact Focused Education identifies him as a co-founder. Older partner biographies retain his previous Meselson Center title."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Probably Good",
            "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "RAND AI-security research leader and co-founder of Probably Good and Impact Focused Education.",
        "structuralRole": "Research and career-institution builder",
        "significance": "He connects policy-facing security research to organizations developing people and educational programmes.",
        "background": [
          "RAND currently identifies Nevo as founding director of its Center on AI, Security, and Technology. He co-authored the model-weights security report with Lahav. Probably Good lists him as co-founder, former research head and director; Impact Focused Education identifies him as a co-founder. Older partner biographies retain his previous Meselson Center title."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "RAND currently identifies Nevo as founding director of its Center on AI, Security, and Technology. He co-authored the model-weights security report with Lahav. Probably Good lists him as co-founder, former research head and director; Impact Focused Education identifies him as a co-founder. Older partner biographies retain his previous Meselson Center title.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-pg",
              "w47-e-sella-ife",
              "w47-e-sella-rand",
              "w47-e-mooc-sella",
              "w47-e-sella-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current director of RAND Center on AI, Security, and Technology.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-rand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research leader",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "RAND Corporation",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current director and former research head.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-pg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Probably Good",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder / director",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "Probably Good",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint recipient in the same ledger row.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-mooc-sella"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named joint grantee",
            "sourceName": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "targetName": "Sella Nevo",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-founded the educational initiative.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-ife"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Impact Focused Education",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "Impact Focused Education",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Named author of the RAND publication.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-author.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-sella"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Dan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His current RAND role is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.",
            "matched": [
              "Sella Nevo"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "942f07a64be9390da9984586306d70df22ae29cc109f6348c4597c47963ba776"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "The education funding is specific too. EA Funds’ ledger , which returns CSV, lists one joint $394,968 grant to Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo in the third quarter of 2022 for an online course about pursuing high-impact work. It does not identify the course or receiving organization, so the map keeps the grant attached to its named recipients.",
            "matched": [
              "Sella Nevo"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "6a5e9743efb5b887ef30a3d9871b7eae428c05b5d1f2042aec41a5210881ea77"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Probably Good",
            "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-ea-israel",
      "label": "Effective Altruism Israel",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Israeli EA nonprofit supporting impact-oriented careers and hosting Heron.",
      "roles": [
        "Community and legal host"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "EA Israel"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-ea-israel",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-ea-israel",
        "name": "Effective Altruism Israel",
        "role": "Community and legal host",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Israeli EA nonprofit supporting impact-oriented careers and hosting Heron.",
        "why": "It supplies an organizational home for AI-security career development while sharing a board member with a major evaluator.",
        "about": [
          "Its current board includes Omer Nevo. Heron identifies itself as a project of EA Israel and gives the registered nonprofit number 580709210. This host-project relationship is distinct from Heron's funding by Coefficient Giving."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "EA Israel"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
            "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Israeli EA nonprofit supporting impact-oriented careers and hosting Heron.",
        "structuralRole": "Community and legal host",
        "significance": "It supplies an organizational home for AI-security career development while sharing a board member with a major evaluator.",
        "background": [
          "Its current board includes Omer Nevo. Heron identifies itself as a project of EA Israel and gives the registered nonprofit number 580709210. This host-project relationship is distinct from Heron's funding by Coefficient Giving."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Its current board includes Omer Nevo. Heron identifies itself as a project of EA Israel and gives the registered nonprofit number 580709210. This host-project relationship is distinct from Heron's funding by Coefficient Giving.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
                "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
              },
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-israel",
              "w47-e-israel-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Heron identifies EA Israel as its registered nonprofit host.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-israel-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Heron",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosts project",
            "sourceName": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "targetName": "Heron",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Name appears in the current board list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-israel"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
                "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omer Nevo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Board member",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Omer Nevo is Irregular’s co-founder and CTO. EA Israel lists him on its board. Probably Good identifies him as its co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron lists him as an adviser, names EA Israel as its institutional host and discloses Coefficient Giving funding. Heron helps cybersecurity practitioners find opportunities in AI security.",
            "matched": [
              "EA Israel"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86cdc9d53fbe1d4a5b7d11590fff01b5a9344de3aa14b00f477a81c31ba63fb7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
            "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-heron",
      "label": "Heron",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "EA Israel project connecting cybersecurity practitioners with work in AI security.",
      "roles": [
        "Specialist career and research pipeline"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Heron AI Security"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-heron",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-heron",
        "name": "Heron",
        "role": "Specialist career and research pipeline",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "EA Israel project connecting cybersecurity practitioners with work in AI security.",
        "why": "Its funder, institutional host and adviser expose three different links into the AI-security field.",
        "about": [
          "Launched in December 2024, Heron advertises professional networking, research and learning programmes. It discloses Coefficient Giving funding, EA Israel as its host and Omer Nevo on its advisory board. Its aim is to help security expertise reach startups, labs and policy work."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Heron AI Security"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "EA Israel project connecting cybersecurity practitioners with work in AI security.",
        "structuralRole": "Specialist career and research pipeline",
        "significance": "Its funder, institutional host and adviser expose three different links into the AI-security field.",
        "background": [
          "Launched in December 2024, Heron advertises professional networking, research and learning programmes. It discloses Coefficient Giving funding, EA Israel as its host and Omer Nevo on its advisory board. Its aim is to help security expertise reach startups, labs and policy work."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Launched in December 2024, Heron advertises professional networking, research and learning programmes. It discloses Coefficient Giving funding, EA Israel as its host and Omer Nevo on its advisory board. Its aim is to help security expertise reach startups, labs and policy work.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-heron",
              "w47-e-israel-heron",
              "w47-e-cg-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Heron identifies EA Israel as its registered nonprofit host.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-israel-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosts project",
            "sourceName": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "targetName": "Heron",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Heron identifies Coefficient Giving as its funder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-cg-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Disclosed funder",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Heron",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Heron names Nevo as an adviser.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-heron"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Heron",
                "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omer Nevo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Advisory board",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Heron",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Omer Nevo is Irregular’s co-founder and CTO. EA Israel lists him on its board. Probably Good identifies him as its co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron lists him as an adviser, names EA Israel as its institutional host and discloses Coefficient Giving funding. Heron helps cybersecurity practitioners find opportunities in AI security.",
            "matched": [
              "Heron"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86cdc9d53fbe1d4a5b7d11590fff01b5a9344de3aa14b00f477a81c31ba63fb7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Heron",
            "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-pg",
      "label": "Probably Good",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Nonprofit career-advice organization co-founded by Omer and Sella Nevo.",
      "roles": [
        "Career guidance and professional network"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-pg",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-pg",
        "name": "Probably Good",
        "role": "Career guidance and professional network",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Nonprofit career-advice organization co-founded by Omer and Sella Nevo.",
        "why": "The founders now connect career infrastructure to commercial AI security and RAND research.",
        "about": [
          "Probably Good offers free career resources and advice across impact-oriented work. Both co-founders remain on its board, while their current external roles lie at Irregular and RAND. Itamar Shatz is listed as CEO; Omer's CEO and Sella's research-head roles are historical."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Probably Good",
            "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Nonprofit career-advice organization co-founded by Omer and Sella Nevo.",
        "structuralRole": "Career guidance and professional network",
        "significance": "The founders now connect career infrastructure to commercial AI security and RAND research.",
        "background": [
          "Probably Good offers free career resources and advice across impact-oriented work. Both co-founders remain on its board, while their current external roles lie at Irregular and RAND. Itamar Shatz is listed as CEO; Omer's CEO and Sella's research-head roles are historical."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Probably Good offers free career resources and advice across impact-oriented work. Both co-founders remain on its board, while their current external roles lie at Irregular and RAND. Itamar Shatz is listed as CEO; Omer's CEO and Sella's research-head roles are historical.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-pg",
              "w47-e-sella-pg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current director and former research head.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sella-pg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sella Nevo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder / director",
            "sourceName": "Sella Nevo",
            "targetName": "Probably Good",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Current director and former CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-omer-pg"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Probably Good",
                "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omer Nevo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder / director",
            "sourceName": "Omer Nevo",
            "targetName": "Probably Good",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Dan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His current RAND role is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.",
            "matched": [
              "Probably Good"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "942f07a64be9390da9984586306d70df22ae29cc109f6348c4597c47963ba776"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Omer Nevo is Irregular’s co-founder and CTO. EA Israel lists him on its board. Probably Good identifies him as its co-founder, former CEO and current director. Heron lists him as an adviser, names EA Israel as its institutional host and discloses Coefficient Giving funding. Heron helps cybersecurity practitioners find opportunities in AI security.",
            "matched": [
              "Probably Good"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "86cdc9d53fbe1d4a5b7d11590fff01b5a9344de3aa14b00f477a81c31ba63fb7"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Probably Good",
            "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-ife",
      "label": "Impact Focused Education",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Educational initiative co-founded by Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo.",
      "roles": [
        "Impact-oriented education"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "IFE"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-ife",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-ife",
        "name": "Impact Focused Education",
        "role": "Impact-oriented education",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Educational initiative co-founded by Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo.",
        "why": "It is an explicit educational connection between an AI-security entrepreneur and a policy researcher.",
        "about": [
          "The initiative develops teaching tools and courses about choosing and pursuing high-impact work. Its founders are Lahav and Sella Nevo. A separate EA Funds ledger lists a joint MOOC grant to the two people, without naming the eventual course or recipient organization."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "IFE"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Educational initiative co-founded by Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo.",
        "structuralRole": "Impact-oriented education",
        "significance": "It is an explicit educational connection between an AI-security entrepreneur and a policy researcher.",
        "background": [
          "The initiative develops teaching tools and courses about choosing and pursuing high-impact work. Its founders are Lahav and Sella Nevo. A separate EA Funds ledger lists a joint MOOC grant to the two people, without naming the eventual course or recipient organization."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The initiative develops teaching tools and courses about choosing and pursuing high-impact work. Its founders are Lahav and Sella Nevo. A separate EA Funds ledger lists a joint MOOC grant to the two people, without naming the eventual course or recipient organization.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              },
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-ife",
              "w47-e-sella-ife"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-founded the educational initiative.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-ife"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
                "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Lahav",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "Impact Focused Education",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "The people connect the institutions",
            "text": "Dan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded Impact Focused Education with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His current RAND role is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.",
            "matched": [
              "Impact Focused Education"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "942f07a64be9390da9984586306d70df22ae29cc109f6348c4597c47963ba776"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
            "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-sequoia",
      "label": "Sequoia Capital",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Venture investor backing Irregular and its AI-security business.",
      "roles": [
        "Commercial capital"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-sequoia",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-sequoia",
        "name": "Sequoia Capital",
        "role": "Commercial capital",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Venture investor backing Irregular and its AI-security business.",
        "why": "Its investment rationale links privileged lab access, evaluation services and a growing security market.",
        "about": [
          "Sequoia records partnering with Irregular in 2025. Its investment announcement describes testing, defenses, compliance standards and roadmaps, and names Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind as lab partners."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Venture investor backing Irregular and its AI-security business.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial capital",
        "significance": "Its investment rationale links privileged lab access, evaluation services and a growing security market.",
        "background": [
          "Sequoia records partnering with Irregular in 2025. Its investment announcement describes testing, defenses, compliance standards and roadmaps, and names Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind as lab partners."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Sequoia records partnering with Irregular in 2025. Its investment announcement describes testing, defenses, compliance standards and roadmaps, and names Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind as lab partners.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
                "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sequoia-investment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Sequoia confirms its investment partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-sequoia-investment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
                "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Venture backing",
            "sourceName": "Sequoia Capital",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
            "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-redpoint",
      "label": "Redpoint Ventures",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Venture investor named in Irregular's $80m funding announcement.",
      "roles": [
        "Commercial capital"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Redpoint"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-redpoint",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-redpoint",
        "name": "Redpoint Ventures",
        "role": "Commercial capital",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Venture investor named in Irregular's $80m funding announcement.",
        "why": "It adds an ordinary venture-investment channel alongside Irregular's earlier philanthropic grant record.",
        "about": [
          "Irregular's public launch announcement names Sequoia and Redpoint as leading its funding. The $80m is the combined announced raise; the public statement does not allocate a separate amount to Redpoint."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Redpoint"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Venture investor named in Irregular's $80m funding announcement.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial capital",
        "significance": "It adds an ordinary venture-investment channel alongside Irregular's earlier philanthropic grant record.",
        "background": [
          "Irregular's public launch announcement names Sequoia and Redpoint as leading its funding. The $80m is the combined announced raise; the public statement does not allocate a separate amount to Redpoint."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Irregular's public launch announcement names Sequoia and Redpoint as leading its funding. The $80m is the combined announced raise; the public statement does not allocate a separate amount to Redpoint.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-redpoint-investment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Redpoint named in the combined $80m raise.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-redpoint-investment"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
                "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Venture backing",
            "sourceName": "Redpoint Ventures",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
            "heading": "Philanthropic money before the venture announcement",
            "text": "The company’s later launch announcement explicitly identifies Irregular as the former Pattern Labs and announces $80 million raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. The name change is publicly acknowledged. The earlier grant’s old live URL now redirects to Good Ventures’ giving overview; the historical entry is available in the archive.",
            "matched": [
              "Redpoint"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "7b1860902e8b0bf9a78e3e6ebbb20e2cb7c062e2a390283826b3697c609d6bb3"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-mooc",
      "label": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A single $394,968 EA Infrastructure Fund grant listed jointly for Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo.",
      "roles": [
        "Educational grant record"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-mooc",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-mooc",
        "name": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
        "role": "Educational grant record",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A single $394,968 EA Infrastructure Fund grant listed jointly for Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo.",
        "why": "One grant supports two named recipients; representing the award itself prevents counting the same money twice.",
        "about": [
          "EA Funds ledger row recqhbPcafZbYOMBd lists the grant in 2022 Q3 for an online course encouraging high-impact work. The ledger does not name the course or a legal recipient organization."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A single $394,968 EA Infrastructure Fund grant listed jointly for Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo.",
        "structuralRole": "Educational grant record",
        "significance": "One grant supports two named recipients; representing the award itself prevents counting the same money twice.",
        "background": [
          "EA Funds ledger row recqhbPcafZbYOMBd lists the grant in 2022 Q3 for an online course encouraging high-impact work. The ledger does not name the course or a legal recipient organization."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "EA Funds ledger row recqhbPcafZbYOMBd lists the grant in 2022 Q3 for an online course encouraging high-impact work. The ledger does not name the course or a legal recipient organization.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-eaif-mooc",
              "w47-e-mooc-lahav",
              "w47-e-mooc-sella"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "2022 Q3 ledger grant for an online course.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-eaif-mooc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Lists joint $394,968 grant",
            "sourceName": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "targetName": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "date": "2022 Q3"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint recipient in the same ledger row.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-mooc-sella"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Sella Nevo",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named joint grantee",
            "sourceName": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "targetName": "Sella Nevo",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Joint recipient in the ledger.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-mooc-lahav"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
                "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Lahav",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named joint grantee",
            "sourceName": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "targetName": "Dan Lahav",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
            "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-weights",
      "label": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "RAND report co-authored by Sella Nevo and Dan Lahav on protecting frontier-model weights.",
      "roles": [
        "Security framework and policy research"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-weights",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-weights",
        "name": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
        "role": "Security framework and policy research",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "RAND report co-authored by Sella Nevo and Dan Lahav on protecting frontier-model weights.",
        "why": "It carries work by the same people into a policy-facing research institution.",
        "about": [
          "Published May 30, 2024, the report outlines attacker categories and security levels for protecting model weights. The publication page gives the authorship and recommendations; the full report was not reviewed in this pass."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "RAND report co-authored by Sella Nevo and Dan Lahav on protecting frontier-model weights.",
        "structuralRole": "Security framework and policy research",
        "significance": "It carries work by the same people into a policy-facing research institution.",
        "background": [
          "Published May 30, 2024, the report outlines attacker categories and security levels for protecting model weights. The publication page gives the authorship and recommendations; the full report was not reviewed in this pass."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Published May 30, 2024, the report outlines attacker categories and security levels for protecting model weights. The publication page gives the authorship and recommendations; the full report was not reviewed in this pass.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-weights",
              "w47-e-sella-weights",
              "w47-e-rand-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "RAND publishes model-weights security research.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-rand-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes security framework",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Named author of the RAND publication.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-lahav-weights"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
                "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Lahav",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
            "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-guidance",
      "label": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Proposed industry guidance following the 2026 evaluation-environment incidents.",
      "roles": [
        "Post-incident standard development"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w47-guidance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w47-guidance",
        "name": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
        "role": "Post-incident standard development",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Proposed industry guidance following the 2026 evaluation-environment incidents.",
        "why": "The supplier involved in containment failures is helping frame the industry response.",
        "about": [
          "Irregular announced a white-paper initiative on secure cyber evaluations. OpenAI said it would participate and continue working with the supplier. This is an announced collaboration, not an enacted regulatory mandate."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Addressing Recent Incidents: Ongoing Findings and Path Forward",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward"
          },
          {
            "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Proposed industry guidance following the 2026 evaluation-environment incidents.",
        "structuralRole": "Post-incident standard development",
        "significance": "The supplier involved in containment failures is helping frame the industry response.",
        "background": [
          "Irregular announced a white-paper initiative on secure cyber evaluations. OpenAI said it would participate and continue working with the supplier. This is an announced collaboration, not an enacted regulatory mandate."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Irregular announced a white-paper initiative on secure cyber evaluations. OpenAI said it would participate and continue working with the supplier. This is an announced collaboration, not an enacted regulatory mandate.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Addressing Recent Incidents: Ongoing Findings and Path Forward",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward"
              },
              {
                "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-irregular-guidance",
              "w47-e-openai-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "OpenAI says it will contribute to the white paper and continue the partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-openai-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
                "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Will participate",
            "sourceName": "OpenAI",
            "targetName": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Supplier proposes shared cyber-evaluation guidance after containment failures.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w47-e-irregular-guidance"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Addressing Recent Incidents: Ongoing Findings and Path Forward",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Announces best-practice work",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Addressing Recent Incidents: Ongoing Findings and Path Forward",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward"
          },
          {
            "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
            "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19",
            "title": "AI incidents: what the tests actually show"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-agenda",
      "label": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A research agenda for AI security, co-authored by Irregular and RAND researchers.",
      "roles": [
        "Policy-facing research"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-root-agenda",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-root-agenda",
        "name": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
        "role": "Policy-facing research",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A research agenda for AI security, co-authored by Irregular and RAND researchers.",
        "why": "Shows how suppliers participate in setting security priorities.",
        "about": [
          "A research agenda for AI security, co-authored by Irregular and RAND researchers."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "ai-security-research-and-the-market-it-proposes-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A research agenda for AI security, co-authored by Irregular and RAND researchers.",
        "structuralRole": "Agenda-setting research",
        "significance": "Connects technical expertise with proposed investment and institutional priorities.",
        "background": [],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What it proposes",
            "text": "The agenda covers public-private coordination, security engineering, assurance and agent governance. Irregular presented the collaboration on August 24, 2026.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "ai-security-research-and-the-market-it-proposes-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Research collaboration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-irregular"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Research collaboration",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Researchers co-author.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-rand"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "RAND Corporation",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Researchers co-author",
            "sourceName": "RAND Corporation",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Co-author.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-root-e-lahav"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
                "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Dan Lahav",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-author",
            "sourceName": "Dan Lahav",
            "targetName": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069"
          },
          {
            "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "ai-security-research-and-the-market-it-proposes-2026-09-19",
            "title": "AI security research—and the market it proposes"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-irving",
      "label": "Geoffrey Irving",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Resolution co-founder and chief scientist, formerly chief scientist at UK AISI.",
      "roles": [
        "Research leadership across laboratories and government"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-cap-irving",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-cap-irving",
        "name": "Geoffrey Irving",
        "role": "Research leadership across laboratories and government",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Resolution co-founder and chief scientist, formerly chief scientist at UK AISI.",
        "why": "His career joins frontier laboratories, a government institute and a philanthropically funded research organization.",
        "about": [
          "His biography also records leadership of alignment teams at OpenAI and DeepMind."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
            "url": "https://naml.us/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Resolution co-founder and chief scientist, formerly chief scientist at UK AISI.",
        "structuralRole": "Research leadership across laboratories and government",
        "significance": "His career joins frontier laboratories, a government institute and a philanthropically funded research organization.",
        "background": [
          "His biography also records leadership of alignment teams at OpenAI and DeepMind."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in the network",
            "text": "His biography also records leadership of alignment teams at OpenAI and DeepMind.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-resolution",
              "w48-cap-e-irving-aisi",
              "w48-cap-e-irving-openai",
              "w48-cap-e-irving-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Irving lists earlier DeepMind team leadership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-deepmind"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "DeepMind",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former Scalable Alignment Team lead",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "targetName": "DeepMind",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Irving lists earlier OpenAI team leadership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-openai"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "OpenAI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former Reflection Team lead",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "targetName": "OpenAI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Irving identifies his former UK AISI role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-aisi"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Former chief scientist",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Irving lists his current leadership role.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-irving-resolution"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
                "url": "https://naml.us/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder and chief scientist",
            "sourceName": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "targetName": "Resolution",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
            "url": "https://naml.us/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-agent-foundations",
      "label": "Resolution Agent Foundations team",
      "type": "group",
      "summary": "Research group announced at Resolution in September 2026.",
      "roles": [
        "Research team"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-cap-agent-foundations",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-cap-agent-foundations",
        "name": "Resolution Agent Foundations team",
        "role": "Research team",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Research group announced at Resolution in September 2026.",
        "why": "It brings the MIRI-adjacent Agent Foundations tradition into Resolution.",
        "about": [
          "The announcement names Jeremy Gillen, Abram Demski, Sam Eisenstat, Scott Garrabrant and Kaarel Hänni; their work includes concepts, trust and game theory."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Research group announced at Resolution in September 2026.",
        "structuralRole": "Research team",
        "significance": "It brings the MIRI-adjacent Agent Foundations tradition into Resolution.",
        "background": [
          "The announcement names Jeremy Gillen, Abram Demski, Sam Eisenstat, Scott Garrabrant and Kaarel Hänni; their work includes concepts, trust and game theory."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in the network",
            "text": "The announcement names Jeremy Gillen, Abram Demski, Sam Eisenstat, Scott Garrabrant and Kaarel Hänni; their work includes concepts, trust and game theory.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-resolution-team"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "The group announced it was joining Resolution.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-resolution-team"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
                "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Resolution",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hosts Agent Foundations team",
            "sourceName": "Resolution",
            "targetName": "Resolution Agent Foundations team",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
            "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-data-centers",
      "label": "Epoch AI Data Centers explorer",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A public database tracking AI facilities, compute capacity and construction.",
      "roles": [
        "Research infrastructure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-cap-data-centers",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-cap-data-centers",
        "name": "Epoch AI Data Centers explorer",
        "role": "Research infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A public database tracking AI facilities, compute capacity and construction.",
        "why": "It makes a funded project visible as an inspectable public output.",
        "about": [
          "The September 16 expansion reports86 sites and estimated 44% coverage of global AI compute."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A public database tracking AI facilities, compute capacity and construction.",
        "structuralRole": "Research infrastructure",
        "significance": "It makes a funded project visible as an inspectable public output.",
        "background": [
          "The September 16 expansion reports86 sites and estimated 44% coverage of global AI compute."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in the network",
            "text": "The September 16 expansion reports86 sites and estimated 44% coverage of global AI compute.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-tracker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Epoch announced expanded global coverage.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-cap-e-epoch-tracker"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
                "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Epoch AI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Builds and publishes explorer",
            "sourceName": "Epoch AI",
            "targetName": "Epoch AI Data Centers explorer",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
            "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
            "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "label": "Accenture",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Enterprise technology consultancy selected to build an embedded evaluation practice at Anthropic.",
      "roles": [
        "Commercial AI deployment and embedded evaluation"
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "Accenture plc"
      ],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-accenture",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-accenture",
        "name": "Accenture",
        "role": "Commercial AI deployment and embedded evaluation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Enterprise technology consultancy selected to build an embedded evaluation practice at Anthropic.",
        "why": "Commercial AI deployment and embedded evaluation",
        "about": [
          "Accenture already partners with Anthropic to expand Claude deployment. Its newly acquired Faculty business will lead paid embedded evaluation. Its commercial delivery and assurance roles meet at the same frontier laboratory."
        ],
        "aliases": [
          "Accenture plc"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Enterprise technology consultancy selected to build an embedded evaluation practice at Anthropic.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial AI deployment and embedded evaluation",
        "significance": "Accenture already partners with Anthropic to expand Claude deployment. Its newly acquired Faculty business will lead paid embedded evaluation. Its commercial delivery and assurance roles meet at the same frontier laboratory.",
        "background": [
          "Accenture already partners with Anthropic to expand Claude deployment. Its newly acquired Faculty business will lead paid embedded evaluation. Its commercial delivery and assurance roles meet at the same frontier laboratory."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Accenture already partners with Anthropic to expand Claude deployment. Its newly acquired Faculty business will lead paid embedded evaluation. Its commercial delivery and assurance roles meet at the same frontier laboratory.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              },
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acquires",
              "w48-eval-e-warner-acc",
              "w48-eval-e-pays-evaluation",
              "w48-eval-e-acc-embedded",
              "w48-eval-e-acc-business",
              "w48-eval-e-acc-cyber"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Companies House lists Accenture plc with at least 75% of shares and voting rights, plus director appointment/removal rights, notified March 12.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acquires"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Faculty Science Limited: persons with significant control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Filed control: at least 75% shares and votes",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Anthropic says it will directly fund Accenture embedded evaluation.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-pays-evaluation"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Directly funds evaluator work",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Accenture",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Warner added Accenture leadership roles on acquisition completion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-warner-acc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Marc Warner",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CTO and management committee",
            "sourceName": "Marc Warner",
            "targetName": "Accenture",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Accenture participates in the announced assessment partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-embedded"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Builds embedded evaluator team",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Accenture announces Cyber.AI and reports internal use.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-cyber"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Develops and deploys product",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Joint enterprise Claude deployment programme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-business"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture Anthropic Business Group",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Forms joint Business Group",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Accenture Anthropic Business Group",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Faculty brings a specialist business into that arrangement. Companies House records Accenture plc control of Faculty Science Limited from March 12: at least 75% of shares and votes, plus director appointment/removal rights. Completion was announced March 16, with Faculty CEO Marc Warner additionally becoming Accenture CTO. Filed control ; completion .",
            "matched": [
              "Accenture",
              "Accenture plc"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "32661cece9c59acc400354d9d5a74d3b9cad2baf433186cf653f43ca60f0f2b9"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Accenture was already helping expand Claude's market. In December 2025 the companies announced an Accenture Anthropic Business Group: roughly 30,000 professionals to train, joint industry offerings and a co-invested Claude Center of Excellence. That makes commercial expansion part of the assessor's existing relationship with its subject. The earlier partnership .",
            "matched": [
              "Accenture"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0ed3959b6f8406eab858e05d4162b6685435040fbe75eaa8d2ed80ca9a4ed752"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Faculty Science Limited: persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-warner",
      "label": "Marc Warner",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Faculty co-founder and CEO who became Accenture chief technology officer when the acquisition closed.",
      "roles": [
        "Accenture CTO and Faculty CEO"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-warner",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-warner",
        "name": "Marc Warner",
        "role": "Accenture CTO and Faculty CEO",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Faculty co-founder and CEO who became Accenture chief technology officer when the acquisition closed.",
        "why": "Accenture CTO and Faculty CEO",
        "about": [
          "Warner links the specialist AI business to its new parent management. Accenture named him to its Global Management Committee on completing the Faculty acquisition in March 2026."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Faculty co-founder and CEO who became Accenture chief technology officer when the acquisition closed.",
        "structuralRole": "Accenture CTO and Faculty CEO",
        "significance": "Warner links the specialist AI business to its new parent management. Accenture named him to its Global Management Committee on completing the Faculty acquisition in March 2026.",
        "background": [
          "Warner links the specialist AI business to its new parent management. Accenture named him to its Global Management Committee on completing the Faculty acquisition in March 2026."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Warner links the specialist AI business to its new parent management. Accenture named him to its Global Management Committee on completing the Faculty acquisition in March 2026.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-warner-acc",
              "w48-eval-e-warner-faculty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Warner added Accenture leadership roles on acquisition completion.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-warner-acc"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CTO and management committee",
            "sourceName": "Marc Warner",
            "targetName": "Accenture",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Accenture identifies Warner as Faculty CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-warner-faculty"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Marc Warner",
            "targetName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-embedded",
      "label": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "September 18 arrangement for Faculty-led Accenture evaluators to work alongside Anthropic teams.",
      "roles": [
        "Paid external assessment with internal access"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-embedded",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-embedded",
        "name": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
        "role": "Paid external assessment with internal access",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "September 18 arrangement for Faculty-led Accenture evaluators to work alongside Anthropic teams.",
        "why": "Paid external assessment with internal access",
        "about": [
          "The planned work spans model testing, alignment and safeguards. Anthropic funds the work directly; the public announcement leaves detailed operating and publication arrangements unsettled."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "September 18 arrangement for Faculty-led Accenture evaluators to work alongside Anthropic teams.",
        "structuralRole": "Paid external assessment with internal access",
        "significance": "The planned work spans model testing, alignment and safeguards. Anthropic funds the work directly; the public announcement leaves detailed operating and publication arrangements unsettled.",
        "background": [
          "The planned work spans model testing, alignment and safeguards. Anthropic funds the work directly; the public announcement leaves detailed operating and publication arrangements unsettled."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The planned work spans model testing, alignment and safeguards. Anthropic funds the work directly; the public announcement leaves detailed operating and publication arrangements unsettled.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              },
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-embedded",
              "w48-eval-e-faculty-embedded",
              "w48-eval-e-embedded-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Evaluators are intended to receive access comparable to employees.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-embedded-anthropic"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Internal evaluation access",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "targetName": "Anthropic",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Accenture participates in the announced assessment partnership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-embedded"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Builds embedded evaluator team",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Faculty is identified as the lead specialist business.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-faculty-embedded"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
                "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Leads evaluation work",
            "sourceName": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "targetName": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-business-group",
      "label": "Accenture Anthropic Business Group",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Operating partnership formed to expand enterprise adoption of Claude.",
      "roles": [
        "Joint commercial deployment programme"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-business-group",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-business-group",
        "name": "Accenture Anthropic Business Group",
        "role": "Joint commercial deployment programme",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Operating partnership formed to expand enterprise adoption of Claude.",
        "why": "Joint commercial deployment programme",
        "about": [
          "The partners announced staff training, joint industry offerings and a co-funded Claude Center of Excellence in December 2025. This is an operating business group; these sources do not establish a separate incorporated entity."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Operating partnership formed to expand enterprise adoption of Claude.",
        "structuralRole": "Joint commercial deployment programme",
        "significance": "The partners announced staff training, joint industry offerings and a co-funded Claude Center of Excellence in December 2025. This is an operating business group; these sources do not establish a separate incorporated entity.",
        "background": [
          "The partners announced staff training, joint industry offerings and a co-funded Claude Center of Excellence in December 2025. This is an operating business group; these sources do not establish a separate incorporated entity."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The partners announced staff training, joint industry offerings and a co-funded Claude Center of Excellence in December 2025. This is an operating business group; these sources do not establish a separate incorporated entity.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-business",
              "w48-eval-e-anthropic-business"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Joint enterprise Claude deployment programme.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-business"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Forms joint Business Group",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Accenture Anthropic Business Group",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "Accenture was already helping expand Claude's market. In December 2025 the companies announced an Accenture Anthropic Business Group: roughly 30,000 professionals to train, joint industry offerings and a co-invested Claude Center of Excellence. That makes commercial expansion part of the assessor's existing relationship with its subject. The earlier partnership .",
            "matched": [
              "Accenture Anthropic Business Group"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "0ed3959b6f8406eab858e05d4162b6685435040fbe75eaa8d2ed80ca9a4ed752"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-cyber-ai",
      "label": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Accenture cybersecurity solution using Claude as its central reasoning engine.",
      "roles": [
        "Commercial security implementation"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-cyber-ai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-cyber-ai",
        "name": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
        "role": "Commercial security implementation",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Accenture cybersecurity solution using Claude as its central reasoning engine.",
        "why": "Commercial security implementation",
        "about": [
          "The March 2026 launch connects Claude to security workflows, including agent governance. Accenture reports internal deployment as well as customer use; performance figures remain its own account."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Accenture cybersecurity solution using Claude as its central reasoning engine.",
        "structuralRole": "Commercial security implementation",
        "significance": "The March 2026 launch connects Claude to security workflows, including agent governance. Accenture reports internal deployment as well as customer use; performance figures remain its own account.",
        "background": [
          "The March 2026 launch connects Claude to security workflows, including agent governance. Accenture reports internal deployment as well as customer use; performance figures remain its own account."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The March 2026 launch connects Claude to security workflows, including agent governance. Accenture reports internal deployment as well as customer use; performance figures remain its own account.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-cyber",
              "w48-eval-e-claude-cyber"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Claude is described as Cyber.AI central reasoning engine.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-claude-cyber"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Claude powers product",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "Accenture announces Cyber.AI and reports internal use.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-acc-cyber"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
                "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Accenture",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Develops and deploys product",
            "sourceName": "Accenture",
            "targetName": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
            "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-framework",
      "label": "Anthropic Advanced AI Framework (June 2026)",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Policy proposal addressing qualification, financing and independence of AI evaluators.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed evaluator governance and enforcement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-framework",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-framework",
        "name": "Anthropic Advanced AI Framework (June 2026)",
        "role": "Proposed evaluator governance and enforcement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Policy proposal addressing qualification, financing and independence of AI evaluators.",
        "why": "Proposed evaluator governance and enforcement",
        "about": [
          "The framework proposes conflict disclosures, pooled or government funding, public reviews and possible measures against evaluator shopping. These are proposals for regulation, not the terms of the later Accenture engagement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Advanced AI Framework",
            "url": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Policy proposal addressing qualification, financing and independence of AI evaluators.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed evaluator governance and enforcement",
        "significance": "The framework proposes conflict disclosures, pooled or government funding, public reviews and possible measures against evaluator shopping. These are proposals for regulation, not the terms of the later Accenture engagement.",
        "background": [
          "The framework proposes conflict disclosures, pooled or government funding, public reviews and possible measures against evaluator shopping. These are proposals for regulation, not the terms of the later Accenture engagement."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The framework proposes conflict disclosures, pooled or government funding, public reviews and possible measures against evaluator shopping. These are proposals for regulation, not the terms of the later Accenture engagement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Advanced AI Framework",
                "url": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-framework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Proposes evaluator qualification, independence safeguards and regulatory review.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-framework"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Advanced AI Framework",
                "url": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Anthropic",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes proposed framework",
            "sourceName": "Anthropic",
            "targetName": "Anthropic Advanced AI Framework (June 2026)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Advanced AI Framework",
            "url": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Coalition launched September 15 to coordinate AI policy, technical alternatives, persuasion and market incentives.",
      "roles": [
        "Shared political, technical and communications infrastructure"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-coalition",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-coalition",
        "name": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
        "role": "Shared political, technical and communications infrastructure",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Coalition launched September 15 to coordinate AI policy, technical alternatives, persuasion and market incentives.",
        "why": "Shared political, technical and communications infrastructure",
        "about": [
          "Co-founded by Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact, it reports shared services and supported projects already operating. Its public structure names executive leaders and a steering committee; detailed allocation and appointment rules remain to be obtained."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Coalition launched September 15 to coordinate AI policy, technical alternatives, persuasion and market incentives.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared political, technical and communications infrastructure",
        "significance": "Co-founded by Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact, it reports shared services and supported projects already operating. Its public structure names executive leaders and a steering committee; detailed allocation and appointment rules remain to be obtained.",
        "background": [
          "Co-founded by Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact, it reports shared services and supported projects already operating. Its public structure names executive leaders and a steering committee; detailed allocation and appointment rules remain to be obtained."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Co-founded by Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact, it reports shared services and supported projects already operating. Its public structure names executive leaders and a steering committee; detailed allocation and appointment rules remain to be obtained.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-fli-cofounder",
              "w48-eval-e-pl-cofounder",
              "w48-eval-e-ergo-cofounder",
              "w48-eval-e-omidyar-steering",
              "w48-eval-e-mila-steering",
              "w48-eval-e-site-operator",
              "w48-eval-e-aguirre-coal",
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-coal",
              "w48-eval-e-tillemann-coal",
              "w48-eval-e-galinsky-coal",
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-coal",
              "w48-eval-e-assembly-launch",
              "w48-eval-e-member-controlai",
              "w48-eval-e-member-cais",
              "w48-eval-e-member-w11-fund-minderoo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Organizer programme schedules coalition announcements; dated issuer release establishes launch.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-assembly-launch"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              },
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Coalition launch announced same day",
            "sourceName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as site operator.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-site-operator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Liberty Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operates coalition website",
            "sourceName": "Project Liberty Institute",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Coalition website includes this organization in its member roster.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-member-cais"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Center for AI Safety",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Listed coalition member",
            "sourceName": "Center for AI Safety",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Project Liberty named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-pl-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Liberty",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founds coalition",
            "sourceName": "Project Liberty",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ergo Impact named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-ergo-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ergo Impact",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founds coalition",
            "sourceName": "Ergo Impact",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "FLI named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-fli-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founds coalition",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Website places Henderson in coalition founding group.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Henderson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Max Henderson",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Launch names Omidyar Network in steering structure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-omidyar-steering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Omidyar Network",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering committee",
            "sourceName": "Omidyar Network",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The September 15 Pro-Human Assembly now has a concrete institutional outcome: the Pro-Human AI Coalition. Project Liberty's launch statement identifies three organizational co-founders—Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact—and names Mila and Omidyar Network in its steering structure. The coalition is described as an independent nonprofit. Launch announcement .",
            "matched": [
              "Pro-Human AI Coalition"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "06b8c7fea6d4e98a69126b09f14aee4e0ab3d2224eb94f479ee5165767ed0bae"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-project-liberty",
      "label": "Project Liberty",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Frank McCourt initiative and a founding organization of the Pro-Human AI Coalition.",
      "roles": [
        "Coalition co-founder and digital-infrastructure initiative"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-project-liberty",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-project-liberty",
        "name": "Project Liberty",
        "role": "Coalition co-founder and digital-infrastructure initiative",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Frank McCourt initiative and a founding organization of the Pro-Human AI Coalition.",
        "why": "Coalition co-founder and digital-infrastructure initiative",
        "about": [
          "Project Liberty issued the coalition launch announcement. The coalition brings its digital-architecture concerns together with policy, public persuasion and institutional coordination. The website identifies Project Liberty Institute separately as its operator."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Frank McCourt initiative and a founding organization of the Pro-Human AI Coalition.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition co-founder and digital-infrastructure initiative",
        "significance": "Project Liberty issued the coalition launch announcement. The coalition brings its digital-architecture concerns together with policy, public persuasion and institutional coordination. The website identifies Project Liberty Institute separately as its operator.",
        "background": [
          "Project Liberty issued the coalition launch announcement. The coalition brings its digital-architecture concerns together with policy, public persuasion and institutional coordination. The website identifies Project Liberty Institute separately as its operator."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Project Liberty issued the coalition launch announcement. The coalition brings its digital-architecture concerns together with policy, public persuasion and institutional coordination. The website identifies Project Liberty Institute separately as its operator.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-pl-cofounder",
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-pl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Project Liberty named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-pl-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founds coalition",
            "sourceName": "Project Liberty",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Launch identifies McCourt as Project Liberty founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-pl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frank McCourt",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder",
            "sourceName": "Frank McCourt",
            "targetName": "Project Liberty",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "One administrative relationship is explicit: the privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as the website operator. That supplies a service responsibility, while the coalition's incorporation and detailed governing rules remain to be located. Operator disclosure .",
            "matched": [
              "Project Liberty"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "795c043c7a4fcf5af7ad3a65f0b787bfe9655b56c2015c09314f059b8efe3e3b"
          },
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The September 15 Pro-Human Assembly now has a concrete institutional outcome: the Pro-Human AI Coalition. Project Liberty's launch statement identifies three organizational co-founders—Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact—and names Mila and Omidyar Network in its steering structure. The coalition is described as an independent nonprofit. Launch announcement .",
            "matched": [
              "Project Liberty"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "06b8c7fea6d4e98a69126b09f14aee4e0ab3d2224eb94f479ee5165767ed0bae"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-project-liberty-institute",
      "label": "Project Liberty Institute",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "Organization identified by the coalition privacy notice as operator of prohumanai.co.",
      "roles": [
        "Coalition website operator"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-project-liberty-institute",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-project-liberty-institute",
        "name": "Project Liberty Institute",
        "role": "Coalition website operator",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Organization identified by the coalition privacy notice as operator of prohumanai.co.",
        "why": "Coalition website operator",
        "about": [
          "The public notice assigns website operation and personal-information responsibility to Project Liberty. That administrative role is documented independently of the coalition statement describing itself as a new nonprofit institution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Organization identified by the coalition privacy notice as operator of prohumanai.co.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition website operator",
        "significance": "The public notice assigns website operation and personal-information responsibility to Project Liberty. That administrative role is documented independently of the coalition statement describing itself as a new nonprofit institution.",
        "background": [
          "The public notice assigns website operation and personal-information responsibility to Project Liberty. That administrative role is documented independently of the coalition statement describing itself as a new nonprofit institution."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The public notice assigns website operation and personal-information responsibility to Project Liberty. That administrative role is documented independently of the coalition statement describing itself as a new nonprofit institution.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-site-operator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as site operator.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-site-operator"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Operates coalition website",
            "sourceName": "Project Liberty Institute",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "One administrative relationship is explicit: the privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as the website operator. That supplies a service responsibility, while the coalition's incorporation and detailed governing rules remain to be located. Operator disclosure .",
            "matched": [
              "Project Liberty Institute"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "795c043c7a4fcf5af7ad3a65f0b787bfe9655b56c2015c09314f059b8efe3e3b"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-ergo",
      "label": "Ergo Impact",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "One of three organizational co-founders named in the coalition launch.",
      "roles": [
        "Coalition co-founder"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-ergo",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-ergo",
        "name": "Ergo Impact",
        "role": "Coalition co-founder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "One of three organizational co-founders named in the coalition launch.",
        "why": "Coalition co-founder",
        "about": [
          "The launch gives Ergo a founding role alongside Project Liberty and FLI. Max Henderson is identified as its co-founder on the coalition website; the reviewed records do not specify its financial contribution."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "One of three organizational co-founders named in the coalition launch.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition co-founder",
        "significance": "The launch gives Ergo a founding role alongside Project Liberty and FLI. Max Henderson is identified as its co-founder on the coalition website; the reviewed records do not specify its financial contribution.",
        "background": [
          "The launch gives Ergo a founding role alongside Project Liberty and FLI. Max Henderson is identified as its co-founder on the coalition website; the reviewed records do not specify its financial contribution."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The launch gives Ergo a founding role alongside Project Liberty and FLI. Max Henderson is identified as its co-founder on the coalition website; the reviewed records do not specify its financial contribution.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-ergo-cofounder",
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-ergo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Ergo Impact named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-ergo-cofounder"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founds coalition",
            "sourceName": "Ergo Impact",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Website identifies Henderson as Ergo Impact co-founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-ergo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Henderson",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Max Henderson",
            "targetName": "Ergo Impact",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-mila",
      "label": "Mila",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "AI research institute named on the coalition steering committee.",
      "roles": [
        "Coalition steering-committee participant"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-mila",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-mila",
        "name": "Mila",
        "role": "Coalition steering-committee participant",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI research institute named on the coalition steering committee.",
        "why": "Coalition steering-committee participant",
        "about": [
          "Mila participates in the announced steering structure alongside Omidyar Network and the founding organizations. The appointment demonstrates a governance role; its particular votes or powers are not published in the launch material."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI research institute named on the coalition steering committee.",
        "structuralRole": "Coalition steering-committee participant",
        "significance": "Mila participates in the announced steering structure alongside Omidyar Network and the founding organizations. The appointment demonstrates a governance role; its particular votes or powers are not published in the launch material.",
        "background": [
          "Mila participates in the announced steering structure alongside Omidyar Network and the founding organizations. The appointment demonstrates a governance role; its particular votes or powers are not published in the launch material."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Mila participates in the announced steering structure alongside Omidyar Network and the founding organizations. The appointment demonstrates a governance role; its particular votes or powers are not published in the launch material.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-mila-steering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Launch names Mila in steering structure.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-mila-steering"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Steering committee",
            "sourceName": "Mila",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-mccourt",
      "label": "Frank McCourt",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Project Liberty founder involved in launching the Pro-Human AI Coalition.",
      "roles": [
        "Project Liberty founder and coalition co-founder"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-mccourt",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-mccourt",
        "name": "Frank McCourt",
        "role": "Project Liberty founder and coalition co-founder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Project Liberty founder involved in launching the Pro-Human AI Coalition.",
        "why": "Project Liberty founder and coalition co-founder",
        "about": [
          "McCourt puts AI ownership, architecture and distribution of benefits at the center of the initiative. His scheduled assembly session coincided with the dated public coalition launch."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Project Liberty founder involved in launching the Pro-Human AI Coalition.",
        "structuralRole": "Project Liberty founder and coalition co-founder",
        "significance": "McCourt puts AI ownership, architecture and distribution of benefits at the center of the initiative. His scheduled assembly session coincided with the dated public coalition launch.",
        "background": [
          "McCourt puts AI ownership, architecture and distribution of benefits at the center of the initiative. His scheduled assembly session coincided with the dated public coalition launch."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "McCourt puts AI ownership, architecture and distribution of benefits at the center of the initiative. His scheduled assembly session coincided with the dated public coalition launch.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-pl",
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Launch identifies McCourt as Project Liberty founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-pl"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Project Liberty",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Founder",
            "sourceName": "Frank McCourt",
            "targetName": "Project Liberty",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "McCourt identified as coalition co-founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-mccourt-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Frank McCourt",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-tillemann",
      "label": "Tomicah Tillemann",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Executive named to lead the newly launched coalition.",
      "roles": [
        "Pro-Human AI Coalition CEO"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-tillemann",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-tillemann",
        "name": "Tomicah Tillemann",
        "role": "Pro-Human AI Coalition CEO",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Executive named to lead the newly launched coalition.",
        "why": "Pro-Human AI Coalition CEO",
        "about": [
          "The public launch places Tillemann in the CEO role. Its claimed operational infrastructure makes his delegated spending, project-selection and membership authority useful next records."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Executive named to lead the newly launched coalition.",
        "structuralRole": "Pro-Human AI Coalition CEO",
        "significance": "The public launch places Tillemann in the CEO role. Its claimed operational infrastructure makes his delegated spending, project-selection and membership authority useful next records.",
        "background": [
          "The public launch places Tillemann in the CEO role. Its claimed operational infrastructure makes his delegated spending, project-selection and membership authority useful next records."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The public launch places Tillemann in the CEO role. Its claimed operational infrastructure makes his delegated spending, project-selection and membership authority useful next records.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              },
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-tillemann-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Launch identifies Tillemann as coalition CEO.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-tillemann-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
                "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "CEO",
            "sourceName": "Tomicah Tillemann",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The public workstreams join policy coordination, alternative AI architecture, cooperation among countries outside the US-China pair, persuasion and market incentives. The website names Tomicah Tillemann as CEO and Lara Galinsky as executive director. Members shown include ControlAI, the Center for AI Safety and Minderoo Foundation. A member logo, a steering seat and a funding commitment are different relationships. The coalition's structure .",
            "matched": [
              "Tomicah Tillemann",
              "Tillemann"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "47f83013c182afd23a49c0fb5f6780f7cad475226a5ce66dc5961b1a9fa7c40a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-galinsky",
      "label": "Lara Galinsky",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Executive director identified on the coalition website.",
      "roles": [
        "Pro-Human AI Coalition executive director"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-galinsky",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-galinsky",
        "name": "Lara Galinsky",
        "role": "Pro-Human AI Coalition executive director",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Executive director identified on the coalition website.",
        "why": "Pro-Human AI Coalition executive director",
        "about": [
          "The public site names Galinsky among the coalition co-founders and as executive director. The allocation of responsibilities between CEO, executive director and steering committee is not specified there."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Executive director identified on the coalition website.",
        "structuralRole": "Pro-Human AI Coalition executive director",
        "significance": "The public site names Galinsky among the coalition co-founders and as executive director. The allocation of responsibilities between CEO, executive director and steering committee is not specified there.",
        "background": [
          "The public site names Galinsky among the coalition co-founders and as executive director. The allocation of responsibilities between CEO, executive director and steering committee is not specified there."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The public site names Galinsky among the coalition co-founders and as executive director. The allocation of responsibilities between CEO, executive director and steering committee is not specified there.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-galinsky-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Website names Galinsky in executive leadership.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-galinsky-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Executive director",
            "sourceName": "Lara Galinsky",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "The public workstreams join policy coordination, alternative AI architecture, cooperation among countries outside the US-China pair, persuasion and market incentives. The website names Tomicah Tillemann as CEO and Lara Galinsky as executive director. Members shown include ControlAI, the Center for AI Safety and Minderoo Foundation. A member logo, a steering seat and a funding commitment are different relationships. The coalition's structure .",
            "matched": [
              "Lara Galinsky",
              "Galinsky"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "47f83013c182afd23a49c0fb5f6780f7cad475226a5ce66dc5961b1a9fa7c40a"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-henderson",
      "label": "Max Henderson",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Ergo Impact co-founder named among the coalition founding group.",
      "roles": [
        "Ergo Impact and coalition co-founder"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-henderson",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-henderson",
        "name": "Max Henderson",
        "role": "Ergo Impact and coalition co-founder",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Ergo Impact co-founder named among the coalition founding group.",
        "why": "Ergo Impact and coalition co-founder",
        "about": [
          "Henderson provides a named link between Ergo Impact and the coalition leadership. A founder listing alone does not specify a donation, employment contract or veto right."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Ergo Impact co-founder named among the coalition founding group.",
        "structuralRole": "Ergo Impact and coalition co-founder",
        "significance": "Henderson provides a named link between Ergo Impact and the coalition leadership. A founder listing alone does not specify a donation, employment contract or veto right.",
        "background": [
          "Henderson provides a named link between Ergo Impact and the coalition leadership. A founder listing alone does not specify a donation, employment contract or veto right."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "Henderson provides a named link between Ergo Impact and the coalition leadership. A founder listing alone does not specify a donation, employment contract or veto right.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-ergo",
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Website identifies Henderson as Ergo Impact co-founder.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-ergo"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ergo Impact",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Max Henderson",
            "targetName": "Ergo Impact",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Website places Henderson in coalition founding group.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-henderson-coal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
                "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-founder",
            "sourceName": "Max Henderson",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
            "url": "https://prohumanai.co/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-toolkit",
      "label": "Pro-Human Assembly social-media toolkit",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "FLI-hosted collection of reusable assembly graphics and prepared social captions.",
      "roles": [
        "Shared campaign distribution materials"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eval-toolkit",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eval-toolkit",
        "name": "Pro-Human Assembly social-media toolkit",
        "role": "Shared campaign distribution materials",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "FLI-hosted collection of reusable assembly graphics and prepared social captions.",
        "why": "Shared campaign distribution materials",
        "about": [
          "The public event page offers reusable messaging and graphics through an embedded Sosha application. It establishes a shared distribution resource; publication by particular users and achieved reach were not measured."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "FLI-hosted collection of reusable assembly graphics and prepared social captions.",
        "structuralRole": "Shared campaign distribution materials",
        "significance": "The public event page offers reusable messaging and graphics through an embedded Sosha application. It establishes a shared distribution resource; publication by particular users and achieved reach were not measured.",
        "background": [
          "The public event page offers reusable messaging and graphics through an embedded Sosha application. It establishes a shared distribution resource; publication by particular users and achieved reach were not measured."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Role in this network",
            "text": "The public event page offers reusable messaging and graphics through an embedded Sosha application. It establishes a shared distribution resource; publication by particular users and achieved reach were not measured.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-fli-toolkit",
              "w48-eval-e-toolkit-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Toolkit supports common event messaging through an embedded sharing application.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-toolkit-assembly"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Promotes event",
            "sourceName": "Pro-Human Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "How the system operates",
            "text": "FLI event site provides graphics and captions for coordinated sharing.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eval-e-fli-toolkit"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
                "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Future of Life Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes shared materials",
            "sourceName": "Future of Life Institute",
            "targetName": "Pro-Human Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
            "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
            "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-corrigibility",
      "label": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "A specialist fund managed by Max Harms under Lightcone legal approval.",
      "roles": [
        "Specialist research grantmaking"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-com-corrigibility",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-com-corrigibility",
        "name": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
        "role": "Specialist research grantmaking",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A specialist fund managed by Max Harms under Lightcone legal approval.",
        "why": "It separates expert selection from legal authority to issue grants.",
        "about": [
          "The fund supports research on AI systems that remain responsive to correction. Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. is its legal grantmaker and final approver; Harms manages research selection. Future applications use Lightcone Commons."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
            "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-commons-authority"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A specialist fund managed by Max Harms under Lightcone legal approval.",
        "structuralRole": "Specialist research grantmaking",
        "significance": "It separates expert selection from legal authority to issue grants.",
        "background": [
          "The fund supports research on AI systems that remain responsive to correction. Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. is its legal grantmaker and final approver; Harms manages research selection. Future applications use Lightcone Commons."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What it does",
            "text": "The fund supports research on AI systems that remain responsive to correction. Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. is its legal grantmaker and final approver; Harms manages research selection. Future applications use Lightcone Commons.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Governance and decision powers",
            "text": "Lightcone retains final approval of the fund’s grants.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-lightcone-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Legal grantmaker; final approval",
            "sourceName": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "targetName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Harms manages the fund and recommends awards.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-harms-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Max Harms",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fund manager",
            "sourceName": "Max Harms",
            "targetName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Future fund applications use Commons.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-fund-commons"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Lightcone Commons",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Future application platform",
            "sourceName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "targetName": "Lightcone Commons",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Announced research award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-fund-kahn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Ian Kahn",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$35,000 award",
            "sourceName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "targetName": "Ian Kahn",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "A smaller programme supplies a completed example. The Corrigibility Research Fund names Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as its legal grantmaker and final approver. Max Harms manages the fund. On September 3 he announced eight awards totalling $132,000, following more than 100 applications, and directed future applicants to Commons. Ian Kahn was awarded $35,000 and Ben Saudek $3,000; Harms says both first contacted him after his appearance on the 80,000 Hours podcast. Here is a visible sequence from public communication to professional contact to funding. Fund structure , awards",
            "matched": [
              "Corrigibility Research Fund"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5e0864abcead1e7b8b7032a731fefd6b82ddf2e88f51a2bafb59369d051a7eca"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
            "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-harms",
      "label": "Max Harms",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Manager of the Corrigibility Research Fund.",
      "roles": [
        "Grant selection and research direction"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-com-harms",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-com-harms",
        "name": "Max Harms",
        "role": "Grant selection and research direction",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Manager of the Corrigibility Research Fund.",
        "why": "His evaluation choices connect an alignment research agenda to funded projects.",
        "about": [
          "Harms describes a human first review followed by Claude-assisted assessment, with reconsideration and overrides. He values projects both for their research and their potential to bring capable people into alignment careers."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
            "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "How I am evaluating corrigibility grant applications",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-commons-authority"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Manager of the Corrigibility Research Fund.",
        "structuralRole": "Grant selection and research direction",
        "significance": "His evaluation choices connect an alignment research agenda to funded projects.",
        "background": [
          "Harms describes a human first review followed by Claude-assisted assessment, with reconsideration and overrides. He values projects both for their research and their potential to bring capable people into alignment careers."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What it does",
            "text": "Harms describes a human first review followed by Claude-assisted assessment, with reconsideration and overrides. He values projects both for their research and their potential to bring capable people into alignment careers.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              },
              {
                "title": "How I am evaluating corrigibility grant applications",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Policy and public communication",
            "text": "Harms attributes two grantees’ initial approaches to his podcast appearance.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-80k-harms"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "80,000 Hours",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Podcast led to applicant contacts",
            "sourceName": "80,000 Hours",
            "targetName": "Max Harms",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "People and organisational roles",
            "text": "Harms manages the fund and recommends awards.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-harms-fund"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
                "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Fund manager",
            "sourceName": "Max Harms",
            "targetName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [
          {
            "noteId": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
            "heading": "",
            "text": "A smaller programme supplies a completed example. The Corrigibility Research Fund names Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as its legal grantmaker and final approver. Max Harms manages the fund. On September 3 he announced eight awards totalling $132,000, following more than 100 applications, and directed future applicants to Commons. Ian Kahn was awarded $35,000 and Ben Saudek $3,000; Harms says both first contacted him after his appearance on the 80,000 Hours podcast. Here is a visible sequence from public communication to professional contact to funding. Fund structure , awards",
            "matched": [
              "Max Harms"
            ],
            "excerptSha256": "5e0864abcead1e7b8b7032a731fefd6b82ddf2e88f51a2bafb59369d051a7eca"
          }
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
            "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "How I am evaluating corrigibility grant applications",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications"
          },
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-kahn",
      "label": "Ian Kahn",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Researcher awarded $35,000 in the fund’s first round.",
      "roles": [
        "Corrigibility research grantee"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-com-kahn",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-com-kahn",
        "name": "Ian Kahn",
        "role": "Corrigibility research grantee",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Researcher awarded $35,000 in the fund’s first round.",
        "why": "A concrete recipient in the recruitment-to-funding pathway.",
        "about": [
          "The award supports Testing Corrigibility as a Singular Target. Harms reports that Kahn approached him after his 80,000 Hours podcast appearance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-commons-authority"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Researcher awarded $35,000 in the fund’s first round.",
        "structuralRole": "Corrigibility research grantee",
        "significance": "A concrete recipient in the recruitment-to-funding pathway.",
        "background": [
          "The award supports Testing Corrigibility as a Singular Target. Harms reports that Kahn approached him after his 80,000 Hours podcast appearance."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What it does",
            "text": "The award supports Testing Corrigibility as a Singular Target. Harms reports that Kahn approached him after his 80,000 Hours podcast appearance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Announced research award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-fund-kahn"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$35,000 award",
            "sourceName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "targetName": "Ian Kahn",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-saudek",
      "label": "Ben Saudek",
      "type": "person",
      "summary": "Researcher awarded $3,000 in the fund’s first round.",
      "roles": [
        "Corrigibility research grantee"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-com-saudek",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-com-saudek",
        "name": "Ben Saudek",
        "role": "Corrigibility research grantee",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Researcher awarded $3,000 in the fund’s first round.",
        "why": "A second named example of media contact leading to a research award.",
        "about": [
          "The award supports Training a Corrigible Model. Harms reports that Saudek approached him after the same podcast appearance."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-commons-authority"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Researcher awarded $3,000 in the fund’s first round.",
        "structuralRole": "Corrigibility research grantee",
        "significance": "A second named example of media contact leading to a research award.",
        "background": [
          "The award supports Training a Corrigible Model. Harms reports that Saudek approached him after the same podcast appearance."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What it does",
            "text": "The award supports Training a Corrigible Model. Harms reports that Saudek approached him after the same podcast appearance.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-commons-authority"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "Announced research award.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-com-e-fund-saudek"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
                "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "$3,000 award",
            "sourceName": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "targetName": "Ben Saudek",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-commons-authority",
            "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-kids-act",
      "label": "EU KIDS Act — 2026 proposal",
      "type": "policy",
      "summary": "Commission proposal for age-based access and child-protective digital services.",
      "roles": [
        "Proposed EU access and design rules"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "speech",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w48-eu-kids-act",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w48-eu-kids-act",
        "name": "EU KIDS Act — 2026 proposal",
        "role": "Proposed EU access and design rules",
        "area": "Online age rules",
        "intro": "Commission proposal for age-based access and child-protective digital services.",
        "why": "It brings access rules, product design and assessment into one proposed framework.",
        "about": [
          "Published on September 17, the proposal covers social and video services, games, conversational AI and app stores. Its broader aim is a common European framework instead of diverging national approaches. The Commission’s Communication places private implementation within DSA and AI Act enforcement."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal publication",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy"
          },
          {
            "title": "An EU approach to online child safety: COM(2026)680 final",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132528"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "w48-eu-kids-machinery"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Commission proposal for age-based access and child-protective digital services.",
        "structuralRole": "Proposed EU access and design rules",
        "significance": "It brings access rules, product design and assessment into one proposed framework.",
        "background": [
          "Published on September 17, the proposal covers social and video services, games, conversational AI and app stores. Its broader aim is a common European framework instead of diverging national approaches. The Commission’s Communication places private implementation within DSA and AI Act enforcement."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What it does",
            "text": "Published on September 17, the proposal covers social and video services, games, conversational AI and app stores. Its broader aim is a common European framework instead of diverging national approaches. The Commission’s Communication places private implementation within DSA and AI Act enforcement.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal publication",
                "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy"
              },
              {
                "title": "An EU approach to online child safety: COM(2026)680 final",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132528"
              }
            ],
            "edgeIds": [],
            "noteIds": [
              "w48-eu-kids-machinery"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Commission published its legislative proposal on September 17.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w48-eu-e-commission-proposal"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal publication",
                "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "European Commission",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Proposes EU access rules",
            "sourceName": "European Commission",
            "targetName": "EU KIDS Act — 2026 proposal",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal publication",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy"
          },
          {
            "title": "An EU approach to online child safety: COM(2026)680 final",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132528"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "w48-eu-kids-machinery",
            "title": "The EU proposes an age gate—and the machinery behind it"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-cyber-advisory-contract",
      "label": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "DSIT contract with Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for cyber evaluation, safeguarding analysis and advice; corrected value £293,151.",
      "roles": [
        "Government research procurement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w49-cyber-advisory-contract",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w49-cyber-advisory-contract",
        "name": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
        "role": "Government research procurement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "DSIT contract with Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for cyber evaluation, safeguarding analysis and advice; corrected value £293,151.",
        "why": "Documents a paid government relationship before the 2025 venture announcement.",
        "about": [
          "The 9 February 2024 award names Pattern Labs Tech Inc. The 8 April correction replaces £195,434 with £293,151 and sets 25 April as the new end date. The buyer cites technical reasons for awarding without prior competition; the notice reports one tender."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "DSIT contract with Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for cyber evaluation, safeguarding analysis and advice; corrected value £293,151.",
        "structuralRole": "Government research procurement",
        "significance": "Documents a paid government relationship before the 2025 venture announcement.",
        "background": [
          "The 9 February 2024 award names Pattern Labs Tech Inc. The 8 April correction replaces £195,434 with £293,151 and sets 25 April as the new end date. The buyer cites technical reasons for awarding without prior competition; the notice reports one tender."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Award and correction",
            "text": "The 9 February 2024 award names Pattern Labs Tech Inc. The 8 April correction replaces £195,434 with £293,151 and sets 25 April as the new end date. The buyer cites technical reasons for awarding without prior competition; the notice reports one tender.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The award identifies Pattern Labs Tech Inc., the legal name disclosed by Irregular.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-cyber-contractor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Best Practices for Evaluations and Evaluation Suites: Part 1",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Names Pattern Labs as supplier",
            "sourceName": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "DSIT awards work to Pattern Labs; value later corrected to £293,151.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-dsit-cyber-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
              },
              {
                "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
                "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Awards cyber evaluation and advice",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024"
          },
          {
            "title": "Best Practices for Evaluations and Evaluation Suites: Part 1",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-safeguards-contract",
      "label": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "£459,875 award for research feeding government AI evaluations, with public redacted contract terms.",
      "roles": [
        "Government research and commercial reuse agreement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w49-safeguards-contract",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w49-safeguards-contract",
        "name": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
        "role": "Government research and commercial reuse agreement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "£459,875 award for research feeding government AI evaluations, with public redacted contract terms.",
        "why": "Reveals who approves the research, who can publish it and who retains reusable commercial knowledge.",
        "about": [
          "The 17 September 2024 award hires Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for attacks, mitigations and related research with weekly AISI researcher contact. Schedule 20 says the work will feed AISI evaluations and threat models. The initial term is six months, with a three-month extension option.",
          "DSIT retains final research-output sign-off and the decision whether and how to publish. Special Term 1 reserves the supplier’s underlying IP, know-how and improvements, and allows related evaluation products to be developed and sold. The supplier’s detailed tender is commercially redacted and has precedence for deliverables."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "£459,875 award for research feeding government AI evaluations, with public redacted contract terms.",
        "structuralRole": "Government research and commercial reuse agreement",
        "significance": "Reveals who approves the research, who can publish it and who retains reusable commercial knowledge.",
        "background": [
          "The 17 September 2024 award hires Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for attacks, mitigations and related research with weekly AISI researcher contact. Schedule 20 says the work will feed AISI evaluations and threat models. The initial term is six months, with a three-month extension option.",
          "DSIT retains final research-output sign-off and the decision whether and how to publish. Special Term 1 reserves the supplier’s underlying IP, know-how and improvements, and allows related evaluation products to be developed and sold. The supplier’s detailed tender is commercially redacted and has precedence for deliverables."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The purchased work",
            "text": "The 17 September 2024 award hires Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for attacks, mitigations and related research with weekly AISI researcher contact. Schedule 20 says the work will feed AISI evaluations and threat models. The initial term is six months, with a three-month extension option.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Publication and intellectual property",
            "text": "DSIT retains final research-output sign-off and the decision whether and how to publish. Special Term 1 reserves the supplier’s underlying IP, know-how and improvements, and allows related evaluation products to be developed and sold. The supplier’s detailed tender is commercially redacted and has precedence for deliverables.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Order form names Pattern Labs Tech Inc. Special Term 1 retains supplier know-how and permits commercialization of related evaluation products.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-safeguards-contractor"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Hires research team; reserves reuse rights",
            "sourceName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Schedule 9 requires a security management plan, incident notification and remediation; buyer approval does not relieve supplier obligations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-security-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Requires approved security plan",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Schedule 20 commissions technical inputs for AISI evaluations and threat models, with weekly researcher collaboration.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-safeguards-tests"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Supplies attacks for tests and threat models",
            "sourceName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Schedule 20 assigns buyer sign-off and final decision on whether and how research outputs are published.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-publication-control"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Keeps final publication decision",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards award starts 17 September 2024.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-dsit-safeguards-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
              },
              {
                "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Awards £459,875 research contract",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-cyber-budget-study",
      "label": "AISI–Irregular study of evaluation budgets (2026)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Joint research finds that longer cyber evaluations can reveal success missed by shorter tests.",
      "roles": [
        "Research influencing capability measurement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w49-cyber-budget-study",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w49-cyber-budget-study",
        "name": "AISI–Irregular study of evaluation budgets (2026)",
        "role": "Research influencing capability measurement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Joint research finds that longer cyber evaluations can reveal success missed by shorter tests.",
        "why": "Test resources can change the performance estimate used in risk decisions.",
        "about": [
          "AISI and Irregular ran subsets of their private cyber tests with larger budgets. They report additional successes and recommend disclosing token, time and cost limits. The study leaves uncertain how much of the effect belongs to model capability versus the surrounding tools and workflow."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
            "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Joint research finds that longer cyber evaluations can reveal success missed by shorter tests.",
        "structuralRole": "Research influencing capability measurement",
        "significance": "Test resources can change the performance estimate used in risk decisions.",
        "background": [
          "AISI and Irregular ran subsets of their private cyber tests with larger budgets. They report additional successes and recommend disclosing token, time and cost limits. The study leaves uncertain how much of the effect belongs to model capability versus the surrounding tools and workflow."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "What the joint study found",
            "text": "AISI and Irregular ran subsets of their private cyber tests with larger budgets. They report additional successes and recommend disclosing token, time and cost limits. The study leaves uncertain how much of the effect belongs to model capability versus the surrounding tools and workflow.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
                "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Irregular contributes its private cyber evaluations and methods.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-irregular-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
                "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-produces budget-scaling study",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "AISI–Irregular study of evaluation budgets (2026)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "AISI reports joint cyber-evaluation research with Irregular.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-aisi-budget"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
                "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Co-produces budget-scaling study",
            "sourceName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "targetName": "AISI–Irregular study of evaluation budgets (2026)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
            "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-frontiercyber",
      "label": "FrontierCyber benchmark",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Irregular benchmark using real software and devices under specified test conditions.",
      "roles": [
        "Cyber capability measurement"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w49-frontiercyber",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w49-frontiercyber",
        "name": "FrontierCyber benchmark",
        "role": "Cyber capability measurement",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Irregular benchmark using real software and devices under specified test conditions.",
        "why": "The evaluator chooses starting access, tools, objectives and scoring; comparisons require the same benchmark snapshot and timing.",
        "about": [
          "FrontierCyber uses real systems without planting a known flaw. It estimates difficulty, verifies successful outcomes and records partial progress separately. The published design says access, configuration and time affect difficulty, making those details necessary when comparing results."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FrontierCyber: Bringing Offensive Cyber Evaluations to Real Systems",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Irregular benchmark using real software and devices under specified test conditions.",
        "structuralRole": "Cyber capability measurement",
        "significance": "The evaluator chooses starting access, tools, objectives and scoring; comparisons require the same benchmark snapshot and timing.",
        "background": [
          "FrontierCyber uses real systems without planting a known flaw. It estimates difficulty, verifies successful outcomes and records partial progress separately. The published design says access, configuration and time affect difficulty, making those details necessary when comparing results."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "How the measurement works",
            "text": "FrontierCyber uses real systems without planting a known flaw. It estimates difficulty, verifies successful outcomes and records partial progress separately. The published design says access, configuration and time affect difficulty, making those details necessary when comparing results.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FrontierCyber: Bringing Offensive Cyber Evaluations to Real Systems",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Irregular publishes the FrontierCyber design and scoring method.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-frontiercyber"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FrontierCyber: Bringing Offensive Cyber Evaluations to Real Systems",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Develops and scores benchmark",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "FrontierCyber benchmark",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FrontierCyber: Bringing Offensive Cyber Evaluations to Real Systems",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-self-modification-study",
      "label": "Irregular self-modification study (September 2026)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A controlled demonstration of an agent changing a shared model checkpoint to fix a narrow task.",
      "roles": [
        "Study of model-update permissions"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w49-self-modification-study",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w49-self-modification-study",
        "name": "Irregular self-modification study (September 2026)",
        "role": "Study of model-update permissions",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A controlled demonstration of an agent changing a shared model checkpoint to fix a narrow task.",
        "why": "The demonstrated mechanism depends on access to training, weights and deployment.",
        "about": [
          "The main experiment supplies training tools, data, checkpoint access and a deployment path. An agent fine-tunes a shared checkpoint and improves a narrow fictional-query task. The paper presents a favorable mechanism demonstration, not a measured frequency of uncontrolled self-improvement; an API-based agent with external training permissions can perform analogous work."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Agentic Self-Modification in Open-Weights Systems",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A controlled demonstration of an agent changing a shared model checkpoint to fix a narrow task.",
        "structuralRole": "Study of model-update permissions",
        "significance": "The demonstrated mechanism depends on access to training, weights and deployment.",
        "background": [
          "The main experiment supplies training tools, data, checkpoint access and a deployment path. An agent fine-tunes a shared checkpoint and improves a narrow fictional-query task. The paper presents a favorable mechanism demonstration, not a measured frequency of uncontrolled self-improvement; an API-based agent with external training permissions can perform analogous work."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The demonstrated result",
            "text": "The main experiment supplies training tools, data, checkpoint access and a deployment path. An agent fine-tunes a shared checkpoint and improves a narrow fictional-query task. The paper presents a favorable mechanism demonstration, not a measured frequency of uncontrolled self-improvement; an API-based agent with external training permissions can perform analogous work.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Agentic Self-Modification in Open-Weights Systems",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Irregular studies agents with permissions to change model checkpoints.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w49-e-self-modification"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Agentic Self-Modification in Open-Weights Systems",
                "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Publishes controlled experiment",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Irregular self-modification study (September 2026)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Agentic Self-Modification in Open-Weights Systems",
            "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "label": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "A £459,000 DSIT award to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for choosing priority capabilities, designing cyber evaluations and advising other government work.",
      "roles": [
        "Government procurement of evaluation design"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
        "name": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
        "role": "Government procurement of evaluation design",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "A £459,000 DSIT award to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for choosing priority capabilities, designing cyber evaluations and advising other government work.",
        "why": "The supplier helps construct the measuring instrument that government researchers will use.",
        "about": [
          "Contract 6492, awarded on 17 September 2024, calls for iterative capability research, evaluation design and justification of test coverage. It includes advice on other DSIT evaluations and planned access to Inspect infrastructure.",
          "The buyer retains final output sign-off and publication decisions. The contract permits supplier reuse of underlying IP and know-how, and related commercial evaluation products. Independent QA and access to supporting data for buyer QA are required. The accepted outputs and completed QA records have not been recovered.",
          "The notice ends on 16 June 2025; the order form gives a nine-month initial period, optional three-month extension and 16 September expiry including that option. Exercise of the option is not established. The commercially redacted supplier tender takes precedence for deliverables."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "A £459,000 DSIT award to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. for choosing priority capabilities, designing cyber evaluations and advising other government work.",
        "structuralRole": "Government procurement of evaluation design",
        "significance": "The supplier helps construct the measuring instrument that government researchers will use.",
        "background": [
          "Contract 6492, awarded on 17 September 2024, calls for iterative capability research, evaluation design and justification of test coverage. It includes advice on other DSIT evaluations and planned access to Inspect infrastructure.",
          "The buyer retains final output sign-off and publication decisions. The contract permits supplier reuse of underlying IP and know-how, and related commercial evaluation products. Independent QA and access to supporting data for buyer QA are required. The accepted outputs and completed QA records have not been recovered.",
          "The notice ends on 16 June 2025; the order form gives a nine-month initial period, optional three-month extension and 16 September expiry including that option. Exercise of the option is not established. The commercially redacted supplier tender takes precedence for deliverables."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Designing the tests",
            "text": "Contract 6492, awarded on 17 September 2024, calls for iterative capability research, evaluation design and justification of test coverage. It includes advice on other DSIT evaluations and planned access to Inspect infrastructure.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
              },
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Approval, reuse and evidence access",
            "text": "The buyer retains final output sign-off and publication decisions. The contract permits supplier reuse of underlying IP and know-how, and related commercial evaluation products. Independent QA and access to supporting data for buyer QA are required. The accepted outputs and completed QA records have not been recovered.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Duration and withheld scope",
            "text": "The notice ends on 16 June 2025; the order form gives a nine-month initial period, optional three-month extension and 16 September expiry including that option. Exercise of the option is not established. The commercially redacted supplier tender takes precedence for deliverables.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
              },
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Schedule 20 commissions research into priority capabilities, test design, coverage justification and advice on other DSIT evaluations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-methods"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Shapes capability selection and evaluation design",
            "sourceName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The contract names Pattern Labs Tech Inc.; it reserves background IP and know-how and allows related commercial evaluation products.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-supplier"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Commissions design; preserves commercial reuse",
            "sourceName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "targetName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The specification requires independent quality assurance and customer access to all data used to produce outputs for its own QA.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-qa"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Requires independent QA and supporting data",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Buyer officials sign off final outputs; the buyer decides whether and how research is published.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-approval"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Retains output approval and publication decision",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "Funding and resources",
            "text": "DSIT awards Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research, contract 6492.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-accessible-award"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
              },
              {
                "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
                "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Awards £459,000 for cyber evaluation design",
            "sourceName": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "targetName": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract (September 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3"
          },
          {
            "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-govai",
      "label": "Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI)",
      "type": "organization",
      "summary": "AI-governance research organization named with UK AISI as an organizer of the 2024 Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference.",
      "roles": [
        "Research institution connecting technical expertise and policy discussion"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w50-govai",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w50-govai",
        "name": "Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI)",
        "role": "Research institution connecting technical expertise and policy discussion",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "AI-governance research organization named with UK AISI as an organizer of the 2024 Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference.",
        "why": "Its organizing role provides a documented connection between an external research institution and a government-led safety-framework discussion.",
        "about": [
          "An October 2024 DSIT freedom-of-information response identifies UK AISI and the Centre for the Governance of AI as conference organizers. The event was closed, with a stated capacity of 90. This entry currently records that organizing role; its wider funding and governance warrant a dedicated investigation."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "AI-governance research organization named with UK AISI as an organizer of the 2024 Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference.",
        "structuralRole": "Research institution connecting technical expertise and policy discussion",
        "significance": "Its organizing role provides a documented connection between an external research institution and a government-led safety-framework discussion.",
        "background": [
          "An October 2024 DSIT freedom-of-information response identifies UK AISI and the Centre for the Governance of AI as conference organizers. The event was closed, with a stated capacity of 90. This entry currently records that organizing role; its wider funding and governance warrant a dedicated investigation."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Conference organizing role",
            "text": "An October 2024 DSIT freedom-of-information response identifies UK AISI and the Centre for the Governance of AI as conference organizers. The event was closed, with a stated capacity of 90. This entry currently records that organizing role; its wider funding and governance warrant a dedicated investigation.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The response identifies the Centre for the Governance of AI as an organizer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-govai-organizes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as conference organizer",
            "sourceName": "Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI)",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
      "label": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
      "type": "system",
      "summary": "Closed safety-framework conference described in DSIT disclosures, planned for 21–22 November 2024 in San Francisco.",
      "roles": [
        "Convening of government, AI labs and external researchers"
      ],
      "aliases": [],
      "gates": [
        "capital",
        "capability"
      ],
      "url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site/entity/w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
        "name": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
        "role": "Convening of government, AI labs and external researchers",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "intro": "Closed safety-framework conference described in DSIT disclosures, planned for 21–22 November 2024 in San Francisco.",
        "why": "The official disclosure shows which organizations were named around an invitation-only safety-framework discussion.",
        "about": [
          "DSIT names UK AISI and GovAI as organizers. Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy appear in the invitation-related organizational disclosure, alongside other labs and researchers. The record establishes the disclosed invitation context; individual attendance was not verified."
        ],
        "aliases": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
          }
        ],
        "curated": true,
        "notes": [
          "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
        ]
      },
      "profile": {
        "summary": "Closed safety-framework conference described in DSIT disclosures, planned for 21–22 November 2024 in San Francisco.",
        "structuralRole": "Convening of government, AI labs and external researchers",
        "significance": "The official disclosure shows which organizations were named around an invitation-only safety-framework discussion.",
        "background": [
          "DSIT names UK AISI and GovAI as organizers. Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy appear in the invitation-related organizational disclosure, alongside other labs and researchers. The record establishes the disclosed invitation context; individual attendance was not verified."
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Who was named",
            "text": "DSIT names UK AISI and GovAI as organizers. Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy appear in the invitation-related organizational disclosure, alongside other labs and researchers. The record establishes the disclosed invitation context; individual attendance was not verified.",
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "noteIds": [
              "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19"
            ],
            "edgeIds": []
          }
        ],
        "findings": [
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Pattern Labs appears in the organization list disclosed in response to questions about invitations.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-irregular-invited"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named in invitation disclosure",
            "sourceName": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving, appears in the disclosed organization list.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-op-invited"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Coefficient Giving",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Open Philanthropy named in invitation disclosure",
            "sourceName": "Coefficient Giving",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The response identifies the Centre for the Governance of AI as an organizer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-govai-organizes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI)",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as conference organizer",
            "sourceName": "Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI)",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          },
          {
            "title": "What the records show",
            "text": "The official response names UK AISI as an organizer.",
            "edgeIds": [
              "w50-e-aisi-organizes"
            ],
            "noteIds": [],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
              },
              {
                "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
              }
            ],
            "counterpart": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "status": "documented",
            "label": "Named as conference organizer",
            "sourceName": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "targetName": "Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference (November 2024)",
            "date": "2026-09-19"
          }
        ],
        "research": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks"
          },
          {
            "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference"
          }
        ],
        "reading": [
          {
            "id": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
            "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests"
          }
        ],
        "reviewed": true,
        "asOf": "2026-09-19"
      }
    }
  ],
  "edges": [
    {
      "id": "e0",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "founded",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-477c83c16019"
      ],
      "summary": "5Rights identifies Beeban Kidron as its founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e0",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "founded",
        "detail": "5Rights identifies Beeban Kidron as its founder.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: About us",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-477c83c16019"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e1",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "ab2273",
      "label": "Sponsored California adaptation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical UK / California codes",
      "sources": [
        "src-b7bb716eacc0",
        "w3-5r-s-analysis-352148",
        "w3-5r-s-analysis-355438",
        "w3-5r-s-chapter"
      ],
      "summary": "Original2022 California analyses confirm5Rights co-sponsorship. Chaptered text under18 coverage and allowed applying child protections to all consumers instead of estimating age. Kidron sought under18, but causation of the final provision and present enforceability were not assessed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e1",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "ab2273",
        "label": "Sponsored California adaptation",
        "detail": "Original2022 California analyses confirm5Rights co-sponsorship. Chaptered text under18 coverage and allowed applying child protections to all consumers instead of estimating age. Kidron sought under18, but causation of the final provision and present enforceability were not assessed.",
        "date": "Historical UK / California codes",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b7bb716eacc0",
          "w3-5r-s-analysis-352148",
          "w3-5r-s-analysis-355438",
          "w3-5r-s-chapter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e2",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "am84",
      "label": "was listed as a sponsor of the unmoved amendment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07",
      "sources": [
        "src-c401141d51b7"
      ],
      "summary": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Lords Amendment 84. Its status is Not moved; this does not establish enacted shutdown authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e2",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "am84",
        "label": "was listed as a sponsor of the unmoved amendment",
        "detail": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Lords Amendment 84. Its status is Not moved; this does not establish enacted shutdown authority.",
        "date": "2026-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c401141d51b7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e3",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "am84",
      "label": "was credited in Hansard with the shutdown proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-14",
      "sources": [
        "src-b9795844a727",
        "src-c401141d51b7"
      ],
      "summary": "Lords debate attributes the emergency AI-shutdown proposal to ControlAI. Shared legislative work does not establish funding from 5Rights or its donors.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e3",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "am84",
        "label": "was credited in Hansard with the shutdown proposal",
        "detail": "Lords debate attributes the emergency AI-shutdown proposal to ControlAI. Shared legislative work does not establish funding from 5Rights or its donors.",
        "date": "2026-07-14",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b9795844a727",
          "src-c401141d51b7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e4",
      "source": "collective-shout",
      "target": "payment-campaign",
      "label": "Organised open letter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-24fdb5685974"
      ],
      "summary": "Collective Shout published the 10 July letter requesting payment-company leadership stop processing for the targeted game platforms.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e4",
        "source": "collective-shout",
        "target": "payment-campaign",
        "label": "Organised open letter",
        "detail": "Collective Shout published the 10 July letter requesting payment-company leadership stop processing for the targeted game platforms.",
        "date": "2025-07-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-24fdb5685974"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e5",
      "source": "ncose",
      "target": "payment-campaign",
      "label": "Co-signed through Haley McNamara",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-24fdb5685974"
      ],
      "summary": "Haley McNamara signed for NCOSE. Public campaign endorsement; no transfer of funds or directing authority established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e5",
        "source": "ncose",
        "target": "payment-campaign",
        "label": "Co-signed through Haley McNamara",
        "detail": "Haley McNamara signed for NCOSE. Public campaign endorsement; no transfer of funds or directing authority established.",
        "date": "2025-07-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-24fdb5685974"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e6",
      "source": "rouse",
      "target": "payment-campaign",
      "label": "Co-signatory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-24fdb5685974"
      ],
      "summary": "Jon Rouse signed the open letter in his professional identification. No financial or legal authority relationship is stated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e6",
        "source": "rouse",
        "target": "payment-campaign",
        "label": "Co-signatory",
        "detail": "Jon Rouse signed the open letter in his professional identification. No financial or legal authority relationship is stated.",
        "date": "2025-07-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-24fdb5685974"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e7",
      "source": "tankard-reist",
      "target": "payment-campaign",
      "label": "Signed for Collective Shout",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-24fdb5685974"
      ],
      "summary": "Melinda Tankard Reist signed the payment-company letter for Collective Shout.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e7",
        "source": "tankard-reist",
        "target": "payment-campaign",
        "label": "Signed for Collective Shout",
        "detail": "Melinda Tankard Reist signed the payment-company letter for Collective Shout.",
        "date": "2025-07-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-24fdb5685974"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e8",
      "source": "tankard-reist",
      "target": "collective-shout",
      "label": "Movement Director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 trial roster",
      "sources": [
        "src-44c03bd0a530"
      ],
      "summary": "Trial roster identifies Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e8",
        "source": "tankard-reist",
        "target": "collective-shout",
        "label": "Movement Director",
        "detail": "Trial roster identifies Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director.",
        "date": "2024–25 trial roster",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-44c03bd0a530"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e9",
      "source": "payment-campaign",
      "target": "payment-processors",
      "label": "Requested processing withdrawal",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-24fdb5685974"
      ],
      "summary": "Letter addressed PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. It was a pressure campaign and request, not a legally binding order.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e9",
        "source": "payment-campaign",
        "target": "payment-processors",
        "label": "Requested processing withdrawal",
        "detail": "Letter addressed PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. It was a pressure campaign and request, not a legally binding order.",
        "date": "2025-07-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-24fdb5685974"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e10",
      "source": "payment-campaign",
      "target": "steam",
      "label": "Targeted platform",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-24fdb5685974"
      ],
      "summary": "Steam was named among platforms for which the letter sought withdrawal of payment processing; Steam internal decision records were not reviewed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e10",
        "source": "payment-campaign",
        "target": "steam",
        "label": "Targeted platform",
        "detail": "Steam was named among platforms for which the letter sought withdrawal of payment processing; Steam internal decision records were not reviewed.",
        "date": "2025-07-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
            "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-24fdb5685974"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e11",
      "source": "payment-campaign",
      "target": "itch-io",
      "label": "Platform reported campaign effects",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-24 to 2025-08-01",
      "sources": [
        "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
        "src-547a5b3ea786"
      ],
      "summary": "itch.io attributed processor scrutiny and its broad adult-content deindexing to the campaign. Underlying private processor instructions were not obtained; Mastercard denied directly requiring game restrictions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e11",
        "source": "payment-campaign",
        "target": "itch-io",
        "label": "Platform reported campaign effects",
        "detail": "itch.io attributed processor scrutiny and its broad adult-content deindexing to the campaign. Underlying private processor instructions were not obtained; Mastercard denied directly requiring game restrictions.",
        "date": "2025-07-24 to 2025-08-01",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
          "src-547a5b3ea786"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e13",
      "source": "ncose",
      "target": "ai-moratorium-letter",
      "label": "Co-signatory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "src-c5c76c4cf21e"
      ],
      "summary": "NCOSE appears among more than 140 organisations opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation. A bounded joint advocacy act, not a general alliance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e13",
        "source": "ncose",
        "target": "ai-moratorium-letter",
        "label": "Co-signatory",
        "detail": "NCOSE appears among more than 140 organisations opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation. A bounded joint advocacy act, not a general alliance.",
        "date": "2025-06-30",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c5c76c4cf21e"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e14",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "ai-moratorium-letter",
      "label": "Co-signatory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "src-c5c76c4cf21e"
      ],
      "summary": "FLI is named on the same broad coalition letter as NCOSE. This does not establish FLI participation in the later July gaming-payment campaign.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e14",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "ai-moratorium-letter",
        "label": "Co-signatory",
        "detail": "FLI is named on the same broad coalition letter as NCOSE. This does not establish FLI participation in the later July gaming-payment campaign.",
        "date": "2025-06-30",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c5c76c4cf21e"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e15",
      "source": "au-infrastructure",
      "target": "accs",
      "label": "Awarded trial procurement",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-11-15 announcement",
      "sources": [
        "src-bad5f974d0c4",
        "w1-australia-src-procurement-brief"
      ],
      "summary": "Departmental tender announcement and original September24,2025 briefing identify ACCS's November8,2024 award CN4111198 at A$3,830,277. This is contract value, not payments received; complete contract and tax schedule unrecovered. Financial details: value: 3,830,277; currency: AUD; kind: contract value; period: Awarded November8,2024; June30,2025 end appears in indexed register; tax basis: Not specified in inspected briefing; GST-inclusive header only indexed in FOI26-176",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e15",
        "source": "au-infrastructure",
        "target": "accs",
        "label": "Awarded trial procurement",
        "detail": "Departmental tender announcement and original September24,2025 briefing identify ACCS's November8,2024 award CN4111198 at A$3,830,277. This is contract value, not payments received; complete contract and tax schedule unrecovered.",
        "date": "2024-11-15 announcement",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-bad5f974d0c4",
          "w1-australia-src-procurement-brief"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 3,830,277; currency: AUD; kind: contract value; period: Awarded November8,2024; June30,2025 end appears in indexed register; tax basis: Not specified in inspected briefing; GST-inclusive header only indexed in FOI26-176"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e16",
      "source": "accs",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "Consortium lead",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-bad5f974d0c4",
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "ACCS-led consortium delivered the government-commissioned trial. ACCS declared commercial testing/certification services to age-assurance firms; participation was open beyond its clients.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e16",
        "source": "accs",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "Consortium lead",
        "detail": "ACCS-led consortium delivered the government-commissioned trial. ACCS declared commercial testing/certification services to age-assurance firms; participation was open beyond its clients.",
        "date": "2024–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-bad5f974d0c4",
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e17",
      "source": "au-infrastructure",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "Commissioned / published study",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-bad5f974d0c4",
        "src-d17247535809"
      ],
      "summary": "Government commissioned the contractor-run trial and published its completed final report on 31 August 2025.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e17",
        "source": "au-infrastructure",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "Commissioned / published study",
        "detail": "Government commissioned the contractor-run trial and published its completed final report on 31 August 2025.",
        "date": "2024–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-bad5f974d0c4",
          "src-d17247535809"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e18",
      "source": "trial-board",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "Stakeholder advice",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-44c03bd0a530",
        "src-d17247535809"
      ],
      "summary": "Stakeholder advisory board supported the trial. It was not a statutory regulator and no ongoing 2026 mandate is inferred from the live roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e18",
        "source": "trial-board",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "Stakeholder advice",
        "detail": "Stakeholder advisory board supported the trial. It was not a statutory regulator and no ongoing 2026 mandate is inferred from the live roster.",
        "date": "2024–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-44c03bd0a530",
          "src-d17247535809"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e19",
      "source": "rouse",
      "target": "trial-board",
      "label": "Chair / member appointment role",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-44c03bd0a530"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator's published description says the chair Jon Rouse appointed members. Exact individual appointment dates and compensation were not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e19",
        "source": "rouse",
        "target": "trial-board",
        "label": "Chair / member appointment role",
        "detail": "Operator's published description says the chair Jon Rouse appointed members. Exact individual appointment dates and compensation were not established.",
        "date": "2024–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-44c03bd0a530"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e20",
      "source": "tankard-reist",
      "target": "trial-board",
      "label": "Listed stakeholder adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-44c03bd0a530"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator lists Tankard Reist as a board member. Appointment does not establish regulatory powers or that the payment campaign caused selection.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e20",
        "source": "tankard-reist",
        "target": "trial-board",
        "label": "Listed stakeholder adviser",
        "detail": "Operator lists Tankard Reist as a board member. Appointment does not establish regulatory powers or that the payment campaign caused selection.",
        "date": "2024–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-44c03bd0a530"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e21",
      "source": "corby",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "Stakeholder-engagement lead",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "Work-package 3 lead through SafetyTech Ltd. Register excludes him from testing age-assurance systems and from euCONSENT's submission process; no failure of those safeguards established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e21",
        "source": "corby",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "Stakeholder-engagement lead",
        "detail": "Work-package 3 lead through SafetyTech Ltd. Register excludes him from testing age-assurance systems and from euCONSENT's submission process; no failure of those safeguards established.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e22",
      "source": "corby",
      "target": "avpa",
      "label": "Director / executive director roles",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "Conflict register identifies Corby's services to AVPA while its members were expected trial participants. Mitigations were disclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e22",
        "source": "corby",
        "target": "avpa",
        "label": "Director / executive director roles",
        "detail": "Conflict register identifies Corby's services to AVPA while its members were expected trial participants. Mitigations were disclosed.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e23",
      "source": "corby",
      "target": "euconsent",
      "label": "Secretary general",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "Conflict register identifies euCONSENT role and potential trial entry; excludes Corby from its submission process.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e23",
        "source": "corby",
        "target": "euconsent",
        "label": "Secretary general",
        "detail": "Conflict register identifies euCONSENT role and potential trial entry; excludes Corby from its submission process.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e24",
      "source": "innovate-uk",
      "target": "defai",
      "label": "Project funding disclosed",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "Conflict register explicitly identifies Project DefAI as Innovate UK-funded. No grant amount or onward funding to ControlAI was recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e24",
        "source": "innovate-uk",
        "target": "defai",
        "label": "Project funding disclosed",
        "detail": "Conflict register explicitly identifies Project DefAI as Innovate UK-funded. No grant amount or onward funding to ControlAI was recovered.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e25",
      "source": "avpa",
      "target": "defai",
      "label": "Project delivery",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations. This edge establishes project work, not uninspected grant terms.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e25",
        "source": "avpa",
        "target": "defai",
        "label": "Project delivery",
        "detail": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations. This edge establishes project work, not uninspected grant terms.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e26",
      "source": "accs",
      "target": "defai",
      "label": "Project delivery",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e26",
        "source": "accs",
        "target": "defai",
        "label": "Project delivery",
        "detail": "AVPA and ACCS identified as Project DefAI delivery organisations.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e27",
      "source": "illuminate-tech",
      "target": "defai",
      "label": "Ethics / data / outreach advice",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–25 register",
      "sources": [
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "Trial conflict register describes Illuminate Tech advice on ethics, data collection and outreach for Project DefAI.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e27",
        "source": "illuminate-tech",
        "target": "defai",
        "label": "Ethics / data / outreach advice",
        "detail": "Trial conflict register describes Illuminate Tech advice on ethics, data collection and outreach for Project DefAI.",
        "date": "2024–25 register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e28",
      "source": "digi",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "Raised contemporaneous objections",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-16",
      "sources": [
        "src-81bf267f91d0"
      ],
      "summary": "DIGI's 16 April 2025 letter in official FOI25-409 pp10–13 raises design, recruitment, competing-role and pre-existing regulatory commitment concerns. These are representations of an interested industry body, not adjudicated defects.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e28",
        "source": "digi",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "Raised contemporaneous objections",
        "detail": "DIGI's 16 April 2025 letter in official FOI25-409 pp10–13 raises design, recruitment, competing-role and pre-existing regulatory commitment concerns. These are representations of an interested industry body, not adjudicated defects.",
        "date": "2025-04-16",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-81bf267f91d0"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e29",
      "source": "au-infrastructure",
      "target": "social-research-centre",
      "label": "A$278,293.40 consumer research order",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-28",
      "sources": [
        "src-81bf267f91d0"
      ],
      "summary": "FOI25-409 PDF p32 records an order executed 28 August 2024 for consumer research, A$278,293.40 including GST. Contract/order value, not proof all cash was received.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e29",
        "source": "au-infrastructure",
        "target": "social-research-centre",
        "label": "A$278,293.40 consumer research order",
        "detail": "FOI25-409 PDF p32 records an order executed 28 August 2024 for consumer research, A$278,293.40 including GST. Contract/order value, not proof all cash was received.",
        "date": "2024-08-28",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-81bf267f91d0"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e30",
      "source": "inman-grant",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "Commissioner",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023–24",
      "sources": [
        "src-ef55ca30efaa"
      ],
      "summary": "Official ACMA/eSafety report records the commissioner's role; source period is 2023–24.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e30",
        "source": "inman-grant",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "Commissioner",
        "detail": "Official ACMA/eSafety report records the commissioner's role; source period is 2023–24.",
        "date": "2023–24",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ef55ca30efaa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e31",
      "source": "inman-grant",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Board role",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023–24",
      "sources": [
        "src-ef55ca30efaa"
      ],
      "summary": "Official annual report records WeProtect board membership in 2023–24. Root's separate current governance evidence may support a current edge.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e31",
        "source": "inman-grant",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Board role",
        "detail": "Official annual report records WeProtect board membership in 2023–24. Root's separate current governance evidence may support a current edge.",
        "date": "2023–24",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ef55ca30efaa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e32",
      "source": "inman-grant",
      "target": "wef",
      "label": "Digital Safety coalition participation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023–24",
      "sources": [
        "src-ef55ca30efaa"
      ],
      "summary": "Official annual report records participation in WEF's Global Coalition for Digital Safety. This is distinct from WEF's Digital Trust programme and establishes no WEF control over eSafety.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e32",
        "source": "inman-grant",
        "target": "wef",
        "label": "Digital Safety coalition participation",
        "detail": "Official annual report records participation in WEF's Global Coalition for Digital Safety. This is distinct from WEF's Digital Trust programme and establishes no WEF control over eSafety.",
        "date": "2023–24",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ef55ca30efaa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e33",
      "source": "wef",
      "target": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "Convened principles work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-01-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-a82329c94eac"
      ],
      "summary": "WEF describes its digital-safety principles working group and resulting joint policy work.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e33",
        "source": "wef",
        "target": "wef-safety-principles",
        "label": "Convened principles work",
        "detail": "WEF describes its digital-safety principles working group and resulting joint policy work.",
        "date": "2023-01-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a82329c94eac"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e34",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "Working-group participant",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-01-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-a82329c94eac"
      ],
      "summary": "WEF identifies WeProtect in the principles working group alongside firms, regulators and rights organisations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e34",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "wef-safety-principles",
        "label": "Working-group participant",
        "detail": "WEF identifies WeProtect in the principles working group alongside firms, regulators and rights organisations.",
        "date": "2023-01-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a82329c94eac"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e35",
      "source": "tech-principles-members",
      "target": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "Named working-group participants",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-01-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-a82329c94eac"
      ],
      "summary": "Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are named participants. Google is shown separately. Shared policy development does not establish common ownership or interchangeable agendas.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e35",
        "source": "tech-principles-members",
        "target": "wef-safety-principles",
        "label": "Named working-group participants",
        "detail": "Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are named participants. Google is shown separately. Shared policy development does not establish common ownership or interchangeable agendas.",
        "date": "2023-01-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a82329c94eac"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e36",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "Working-group participant",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-01-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-a82329c94eac"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom is named in the WEF principles working group.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e36",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "wef-safety-principles",
        "label": "Working-group participant",
        "detail": "Ofcom is named in the WEF principles working group.",
        "date": "2023-01-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a82329c94eac"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e37",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "Safety by Design framework connection",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-01-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-a82329c94eac"
      ],
      "summary": "WEF says its principles complement eSafety's Safety by Design framework. This is policy alignment/joint ecosystem context, not an authority relationship.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e37",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "wef-safety-principles",
        "label": "Safety by Design framework connection",
        "detail": "WEF says its principles complement eSafety's Safety by Design framework. This is policy alignment/joint ecosystem context, not an authority relationship.",
        "date": "2023-01-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a82329c94eac"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e38",
      "source": "nij",
      "target": "ncose",
      "label": "US$239,946 research award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "First award 2020; closed by 2026-09-07",
      "sources": [
        "src-aaae21f08c81"
      ],
      "summary": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011, first awarded 2020, total funding to date US$239,946 and closed. Purpose: sex-trafficking demand-reduction research; not evidence of gaming-campaign funding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e38",
        "source": "nij",
        "target": "ncose",
        "label": "US$239,946 research award",
        "detail": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011, first awarded 2020, total funding to date US$239,946 and closed. Purpose: sex-trafficking demand-reduction research; not evidence of gaming-campaign funding.",
        "date": "First award 2020; closed by 2026-09-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
            "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-aaae21f08c81"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e39",
      "source": "jensen-project",
      "target": "ncose",
      "label": "Policy grant support; amount unknown",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021–2025",
      "sources": [
        "src-f762980e9c03"
      ],
      "summary": "Jensen identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee, describing law-centre work, survivor participation, research, convening and awareness. No independently verified amount or approval rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e39",
        "source": "jensen-project",
        "target": "ncose",
        "label": "Policy grant support; amount unknown",
        "detail": "Jensen identifies NCOSE as a 2021–2025 policy grantee, describing law-centre work, survivor participation, research, convening and awareness. No independently verified amount or approval rights.",
        "date": "2021–2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
            "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-f762980e9c03"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e40",
      "source": "pentecost",
      "target": "ncose",
      "label": "Named philanthropic support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-07",
      "sources": [
        "src-ef8d4d859fc2"
      ],
      "summary": "Family foundation page says it supports NCOSE. Secondary dollar figures were not inspected in primary returns and are excluded; no current board/control inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e40",
        "source": "pentecost",
        "target": "ncose",
        "label": "Named philanthropic support",
        "detail": "Family foundation page says it supports NCOSE. Secondary dollar figures were not inspected in primary returns and are excluded; no current board/control inference.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
            "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ef8d4d859fc2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e41",
      "source": "collective-shout",
      "target": "message-scanning-proposal",
      "label": "advocated message scanning in its submission",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-73e997a6d1ef"
      ],
      "summary": "November 2024 submission pp13–14 proposes that relevant services admitting under-18s scan all Australian users' messages and remove specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material. This is the organisation's affirmative answer; proposal only, not enactment or actual deployment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e41",
        "source": "collective-shout",
        "target": "message-scanning-proposal",
        "label": "advocated message scanning in its submission",
        "detail": "November 2024 submission pp13–14 proposes that relevant services admitting under-18s scan all Australian users' messages and remove specified lawful Class 1C / Class 2 material. This is the organisation's affirmative answer; proposal only, not enactment or actual deployment.",
        "date": "2024-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
            "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829="
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-73e997a6d1ef"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e42",
      "source": "vitalik",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "2021 support; total not established",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021",
      "sources": [
        "src-71475aa32b34",
        "src-5a885dee5911"
      ],
      "summary": "Primary FLI announcement confirms Buterin/SHIB support. $25m was a grant-program envelope, not the total donation. FLI describes the gift as unconditional and says no decision role.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e42",
        "source": "vitalik",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "2021 support; total not established",
        "detail": "Primary FLI announcement confirms Buterin/SHIB support. $25m was a grant-program envelope, not the total donation. FLI describes the gift as unconditional and says no decision role.",
        "date": "2021",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI current finance page",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-71475aa32b34",
          "src-5a885dee5911"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e43",
      "source": "vitalik",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Reported disagreement over later strategy",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03",
      "sources": [
        "src-95a63bfefeca"
      ],
      "summary": "March 2026 reporting carries Buterin's criticism of later cultural/political advocacy and FLI's reply. Primary X post inaccessible in the original investigation; no liquidation ledger verified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e43",
        "source": "vitalik",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Reported disagreement over later strategy",
        "detail": "March 2026 reporting carries Buterin's criticism of later cultural/political advocacy and FLI's reply. Primary X post inaccessible in the original investigation; no liquidation ledger verified.",
        "date": "2026-03",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
            "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-95a63bfefeca"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e44",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "lightcone",
      "label": "$162.59m asset transfer",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-12-15",
      "sources": [
        "src-e4e7930e8216"
      ],
      "summary": "$162,587,667 cash/public-securities fair value, related-entity transfer. Not campaign spending.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e44",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "lightcone",
        "label": "$162.59m asset transfer",
        "detail": "$162,587,667 cash/public-securities fair value, related-entity transfer. Not campaign spending.",
        "date": "2022-12-15",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e4e7930e8216"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e45",
      "source": "lightcone",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "$21.05m noncash contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-d7fd807078d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Related-entity contribution of noncash investments in 2024; not new independent external fundraising.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e45",
        "source": "lightcone",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "$21.05m noncash contribution",
        "detail": "Related-entity contribution of noncash investments in 2024; not new independent external fundraising.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d7fd807078d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e46",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "$180.30m asset transfer",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-12-30",
      "sources": [
        "src-e4e7930e8216"
      ],
      "summary": "$180,297,079 cash/financial assets; related-entity allocation, not independent persuasion spending. Financial details: value: 180,297,079; currency: USD; kind: asset transfer FMV; period: 2022-12-30",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e46",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "$180.30m asset transfer",
        "detail": "$180,297,079 cash/financial assets; related-entity allocation, not independent persuasion spending.",
        "date": "2022-12-30",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e4e7930e8216"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 180,297,079; currency: USD; kind: asset transfer FMV; period: 2022-12-30"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e47",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "flfoundation",
      "label": "$25.025m cash transfer",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-12-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-e4e7930e8216"
      ],
      "summary": "Related-entity transfer recorded in 2022 Schedule N.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e47",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "flfoundation",
        "label": "$25.025m cash transfer",
        "detail": "Related-entity transfer recorded in 2022 Schedule N.",
        "date": "2022-12-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e4e7930e8216"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e48",
      "source": "tegmark",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Board / officer service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-d7fd807078d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e48",
        "source": "tegmark",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Board / officer service",
        "detail": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d7fd807078d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e49",
      "source": "tegmark",
      "target": "lightcone",
      "label": "Board / officer service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-0d707744efd9"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e49",
        "source": "tegmark",
        "target": "lightcone",
        "label": "Board / officer service",
        "detail": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0d707744efd9"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e50",
      "source": "aguirre",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Board / officer service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-d7fd807078d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e50",
        "source": "aguirre",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Board / officer service",
        "detail": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d7fd807078d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e51",
      "source": "aguirre",
      "target": "lightcone",
      "label": "Board / officer service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-0d707744efd9"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e51",
        "source": "aguirre",
        "target": "lightcone",
        "label": "Board / officer service",
        "detail": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0d707744efd9"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e52",
      "source": "chita",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Board / officer service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-d7fd807078d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e52",
        "source": "chita",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Board / officer service",
        "detail": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d7fd807078d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e53",
      "source": "chita",
      "target": "lightcone",
      "label": "Board / officer service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-0d707744efd9"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e53",
        "source": "chita",
        "target": "lightcone",
        "label": "Board / officer service",
        "detail": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0d707744efd9"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e54",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Board member",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-b8a63a1347f2"
      ],
      "summary": "Official biography read September 5, 2026; no campaign-specific orders inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e54",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Board member",
        "detail": "Official biography read September 5, 2026; no campaign-specific orders inferred.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b8a63a1347f2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e55",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "Board member",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-b8a63a1347f2"
      ],
      "summary": "FLI official biography supplies CAIS governance bridge.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e55",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "Board member",
        "detail": "FLI official biography supplies CAIS governance bridge.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b8a63a1347f2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e56",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "deepmind",
      "label": "Former investor-director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical; dates unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "src-b8a63a1347f2"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical professional connection; no DeepMind campaign transfer established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e56",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "deepmind",
        "label": "Former investor-director",
        "detail": "Historical professional connection; no DeepMind campaign transfer established.",
        "date": "Historical; dates unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b8a63a1347f2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e57",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "flfoundation",
      "label": "$286,738 expense reimbursement",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-d7fd807078d3"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 Schedule R amount; not a donation. Employee-sharing involved $400,365 separately, not additive new fundraising.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e57",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "flfoundation",
        "label": "$286,738 expense reimbursement",
        "detail": "2024 Schedule R amount; not a donation. Employee-sharing involved $400,365 separately, not additive new fundraising.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d7fd807078d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e58",
      "source": "baif",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "$73,577 expense reimbursement",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-d7fd807078d3"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 Schedule R; employee-sharing amount $66,273 separately. Related transactions are not independent donations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e58",
        "source": "baif",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "$73,577 expense reimbursement",
        "detail": "2024 Schedule R; employee-sharing amount $66,273 separately. Related transactions are not independent donations.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d7fd807078d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e59",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "goodventures",
      "label": "Primary philanthropic adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-94263f452256"
      ],
      "summary": "Institutional advisory role; recommendations and actual foundation awards must not be counted twice.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e59",
        "source": "coefficient",
        "target": "goodventures",
        "label": "Primary philanthropic adviser",
        "detail": "Institutional advisory role; recommendations and actual foundation awards must not be counted twice.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-94263f452256"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e60",
      "source": "tuna",
      "target": "goodventures",
      "label": "Cofounder / board chair",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-d451e2202e83"
      ],
      "summary": "Current governance disclosure at investigation cutoff.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e60",
        "source": "tuna",
        "target": "goodventures",
        "label": "Cofounder / board chair",
        "detail": "Current governance disclosure at investigation cutoff.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d451e2202e83"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e61",
      "source": "moskovitz",
      "target": "goodventures",
      "label": "Cofounder / secretary / treasurer",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-d451e2202e83"
      ],
      "summary": "Current governance disclosure at cutoff; no Facebook/Asana corporate contribution inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e61",
        "source": "moskovitz",
        "target": "goodventures",
        "label": "Cofounder / secretary / treasurer",
        "detail": "Current governance disclosure at cutoff; no Facebook/Asana corporate contribution inferred.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d451e2202e83"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e62",
      "source": "makan",
      "target": "goodventures",
      "label": "Board member",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-d451e2202e83"
      ],
      "summary": "ICONIQ partner; no ICONIQ donation or campaign authority inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e62",
        "source": "makan",
        "target": "goodventures",
        "label": "Board member",
        "detail": "ICONIQ partner; no ICONIQ donation or campaign authority inferred.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Good Ventures governance",
            "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-d451e2202e83"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e64",
      "source": "svcf",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "$1,455,200 cash grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-033fd1e2f487"
      ],
      "summary": "Filed calendar-2023 grant; upstream donor/account unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e64",
        "source": "svcf",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "$1,455,200 cash grant",
        "detail": "Filed calendar-2023 grant; upstream donor/account unknown.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
            "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-033fd1e2f487"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e65",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "$22,000 recommended grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-4711920c1730"
      ],
      "summary": "2023 general-support recommendation/allocation disclosure; not bank-level receipt proof.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e65",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "$22,000 recommended grant",
        "detail": "2023 general-support recommendation/allocation disclosure; not bank-level receipt proof.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4711920c1730"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e66",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "cht",
      "label": "$500,000 recommended grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-4711920c1730"
      ],
      "summary": "2023 recommended policy/messaging-cohesion award; not verified cash transfer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e66",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "cht",
        "label": "$500,000 recommended grant",
        "detail": "2023 recommended policy/messaging-cohesion award; not verified cash transfer.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4711920c1730"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e67",
      "source": "hendrycks",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "Executive / research director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-cf6c0895df42"
      ],
      "summary": "Current organization biography at cutoff.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e67",
        "source": "hendrycks",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "Executive / research director",
        "detail": "Current organization biography at cutoff.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS leadership",
            "url": "https://safe.ai/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-cf6c0895df42"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e68",
      "source": "hendrycks",
      "target": "caisaction",
      "label": "President in FY2024 return",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-29f8a10f712c"
      ],
      "summary": "IRS-derived officer extraction; separate 501(c)(4), inter-entity transfers not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e68",
        "source": "hendrycks",
        "target": "caisaction",
        "label": "President in FY2024 return",
        "detail": "IRS-derived officer extraction; separate 501(c)(4), inter-entity transfers not established.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-29f8a10f712c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e69",
      "source": "hendrycks",
      "target": "xai",
      "label": "Professional adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8016e12c6894"
      ],
      "summary": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e69",
        "source": "hendrycks",
        "target": "xai",
        "label": "Professional adviser",
        "detail": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8016e12c6894"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e70",
      "source": "hendrycks",
      "target": "scale",
      "label": "Professional adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8016e12c6894"
      ],
      "summary": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e70",
        "source": "hendrycks",
        "target": "scale",
        "label": "Professional adviser",
        "detail": "Self-authored professional biography; terms, compensation and decision rights unknown.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
            "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8016e12c6894"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e71",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "dma",
      "label": "Operates creator accelerator",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-0448f8be81b7"
      ],
      "summary": "Rolling application assesses applicant views/alignment and projected reach. Planned aggregate funding up to $100k monthly, not actual annual spend.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e71",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "dma",
        "label": "Operates creator accelerator",
        "detail": "Rolling application assesses applicant views/alignment and projected reach. Planned aggregate funding up to $100k monthly, not actual annual spend.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0448f8be81b7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e72",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "pwh",
      "label": "announced an up-to-$8m campaign envelope",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-0764ac1a884e"
      ],
      "summary": "Campaign launch February 9, 2026. Ceiling across whole campaign; not influencer-only budget or audited expenditure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e72",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "pwh",
        "label": "announced an up-to-$8m campaign envelope",
        "detail": "Campaign launch February 9, 2026. Ceiling across whole campaign; not influencer-only budget or audited expenditure.",
        "date": "2026-02-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0764ac1a884e"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e73",
      "source": "peoplefirst",
      "target": "pwh",
      "label": "Recruits campaign creators",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-65df3f2c31b3"
      ],
      "summary": "Public campaign recruitment mechanism; FLI-to-agency invoice not read.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e73",
        "source": "peoplefirst",
        "target": "pwh",
        "label": "Recruits campaign creators",
        "detail": "Public campaign recruitment mechanism; FLI-to-agency invoice not read.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-65df3f2c31b3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e74",
      "source": "peoplefirst",
      "target": "pwhcreators",
      "label": "Published creator offer / general terms",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-65df3f2c31b3",
        "src-c33ab812f862"
      ],
      "summary": "Public offer and general terms provide approval/revision/removal and possible compensation withholding, plus disclosure compliance. Campaign SOW may supersede; individual completed payments unobserved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e74",
        "source": "peoplefirst",
        "target": "pwhcreators",
        "label": "Published creator offer / general terms",
        "detail": "Public offer and general terms provide approval/revision/removal and possible compensation withholding, plus disclosure compliance. Campaign SOW may supersede; individual completed payments unobserved.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          },
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-65df3f2c31b3",
          "src-c33ab812f862"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e75",
      "source": "pwhcreators",
      "target": "pwh",
      "label": "offered campaign-content work for",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-65df3f2c31b3"
      ],
      "summary": "Public recruitment offer establishes proposed production mechanism, not completed posts or payments.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e75",
        "source": "pwhcreators",
        "target": "pwh",
        "label": "offered campaign-content work for",
        "detail": "Public recruitment offer establishes proposed production mechanism, not completed posts or payments.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-65df3f2c31b3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e76",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "was announced as a placement host by",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-07–2026-11-15 (announced)",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d2091e52111",
        "src-1a8f761e951d"
      ],
      "summary": "CAIS participating organization in announced September 7–November 15 cohort; prospective as of original September 5 cutoff.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e76",
        "source": "cais",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "was announced as a placement host by",
        "detail": "CAIS participating organization in announced September 7–November 15 cohort; prospective as of original September 5 cutoff.",
        "date": "2026-09-07–2026-11-15 (announced)",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d2091e52111",
          "src-1a8f761e951d"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e77",
      "source": "frame",
      "target": "sara",
      "label": "announced a prospective CAIS placement for",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-07–2026-11-15 (announced)",
      "sources": [
        "src-1a8f761e951d"
      ],
      "summary": "Organizer reports upcoming research-communication placement; no completed work/payment verified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e77",
        "source": "frame",
        "target": "sara",
        "label": "announced a prospective CAIS placement for",
        "detail": "Organizer reports upcoming research-communication placement; no completed work/payment verified.",
        "date": "2026-09-07–2026-11-15 (announced)",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
            "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1a8f761e951d"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e78",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "veronica",
      "label": "Creator contract reported by Frame",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d2091e52111"
      ],
      "summary": "Program-reported outcome; executed contract, amount, terms and date not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e78",
        "source": "cais",
        "target": "veronica",
        "label": "Creator contract reported by Frame",
        "detail": "Program-reported outcome; executed contract, amount, terms and date not established.",
        "date": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d2091e52111"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e79",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "mikey",
      "label": "Creator contract reported by Frame",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d2091e52111"
      ],
      "summary": "Program-reported outcome; executed contract, amount, terms and date not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e79",
        "source": "cais",
        "target": "mikey",
        "label": "Creator contract reported by Frame",
        "detail": "Program-reported outcome; executed contract, amount, terms and date not established.",
        "date": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d2091e52111"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e80",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "mateus",
      "label": "Creator funding reported by Frame",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d2091e52111"
      ],
      "summary": "Funding assertion by program; grant agreement, amount and completed payment not read.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e80",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "mateus",
        "label": "Creator funding reported by Frame",
        "detail": "Funding assertion by program; grant agreement, amount and completed payment not read.",
        "date": "Before 2026-09-05; exact date unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d2091e52111"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e81",
      "source": "frame",
      "target": "mateus",
      "label": "Fellow outcome reported",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d2091e52111"
      ],
      "summary": "Program describes alumnus funding outcome; no Frame-to-FLI fiscal transfer inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e81",
        "source": "frame",
        "target": "mateus",
        "label": "Fellow outcome reported",
        "detail": "Program describes alumnus funding outcome; no Frame-to-FLI fiscal transfer inferred.",
        "date": "Before 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d2091e52111"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e82",
      "source": "winga",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Past mentor",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Past cohort; read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d2091e52111"
      ],
      "summary": "Program lists Winga with ControlAI. Shared training infrastructure, not ControlAI funding to Frame.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e82",
        "source": "winga",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Past mentor",
        "detail": "Program lists Winga with ControlAI. Shared training infrastructure, not ControlAI funding to Frame.",
        "date": "Past cohort; read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d2091e52111"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e83",
      "source": "winga",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Creator Outreach & Systems Lead",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815"
      ],
      "summary": "Organization biography at cutoff.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e83",
        "source": "winga",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Creator Outreach & Systems Lead",
        "detail": "Organization biography at cutoff.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e07be722d815"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e84",
      "source": "sfr",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "UK operating / trading identity",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-2ed7c939cd31"
      ],
      "summary": "Privacy notice connects Secure Future Research Ltd to ControlAI. Entity relation, not a payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e84",
        "source": "sfr",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "UK operating / trading identity",
        "detail": "Privacy notice connects Secure Future Research Ltd to ControlAI. Entity relation, not a payment.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK legal-entity notice",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/privacy"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-2ed7c939cd31"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e85",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "sfr",
      "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
        "src-6a9425acbb0c"
      ],
      "summary": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e85",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "sfr",
        "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
        "detail": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
        "date": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
          "src-6a9425acbb0c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e86",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "sfr",
      "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
        "src-6a9425acbb0c"
      ],
      "summary": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e86",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "sfr",
        "label": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
        "detail": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control.",
        "date": "Since 2023-08-22; observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
          "src-6a9425acbb0c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e87",
      "source": "moes",
      "target": "sfr",
      "label": "Former director / voting controller",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-08-22–2023-11-07",
      "sources": [
        "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
        "src-6a9425acbb0c"
      ],
      "summary": "Initial director/PSC; both roles ceased November 7, 2023.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e87",
        "source": "moes",
        "target": "sfr",
        "label": "Former director / voting controller",
        "detail": "Initial director/PSC; both roles ceased November 7, 2023.",
        "date": "2023-08-22–2023-11-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
          "src-6a9425acbb0c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e88",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Founder / CEO",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815"
      ],
      "summary": "Operational title does not override dual UK legal control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e88",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Founder / CEO",
        "detail": "Operational title does not override dual UK legal control.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e07be722d815"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e89",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Special Projects Lead",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815"
      ],
      "summary": "Operational biography; detailed budget-signature arrangements unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e89",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Special Projects Lead",
        "detail": "Operational biography; detailed budget-signature arrangements unknown.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e07be722d815"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e90",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "Chief executive / representative",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 German registration",
      "sources": [
        "src-23397b6fa896"
      ],
      "summary": "German register identifies authorized representative; complete US board not independently mapped.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e90",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "Chief executive / representative",
        "detail": "German register identifies authorized representative; complete US board not independently mapped.",
        "date": "2026 German registration",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-23397b6fa896"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e91",
      "source": "leahy",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "US Executive Director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03 onward",
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815",
        "src-a96ee8404df0"
      ],
      "summary": "March 2026 retrospective announced transition following Conjecture operational ending.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e91",
        "source": "leahy",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "US Executive Director",
        "detail": "March 2026 retrospective announced transition following Conjecture operational ending.",
        "date": "2026-03 onward",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e07be722d815",
          "src-a96ee8404df0"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e92",
      "source": "alfour",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Adviser; founding assistance",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815"
      ],
      "summary": "Organization says he helped Andrea establish ControlAI. No money transfer established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e92",
        "source": "alfour",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Adviser; founding assistance",
        "detail": "Organization says he helped Andrea establish ControlAI. No money transfer established.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e07be722d815"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e93",
      "source": "leahy",
      "target": "conjecture",
      "label": "Cofounder",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022 launch; historical",
      "sources": [
        "src-1b802ead5bff",
        "src-a96ee8404df0"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e93",
        "source": "leahy",
        "target": "conjecture",
        "label": "Cofounder",
        "detail": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
        "date": "2022 launch; historical",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1b802ead5bff",
          "src-a96ee8404df0"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e94",
      "source": "alfour",
      "target": "conjecture",
      "label": "Cofounder",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022 launch; historical",
      "sources": [
        "src-1b802ead5bff",
        "src-a96ee8404df0"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e94",
        "source": "alfour",
        "target": "conjecture",
        "label": "Cofounder",
        "detail": "2022 launch also names Sid Black. March 2026 retrospective describes operational ending, not corporate dissolution.",
        "date": "2022 launch; historical",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1b802ead5bff",
          "src-a96ee8404df0"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e95",
      "source": "conbackers",
      "target": "conjecture",
      "label": "Disclosed 2022 venture backing",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-04",
      "sources": [
        "src-1b802ead5bff"
      ],
      "summary": "Launch names Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown. No onward ControlAI transfer documented.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e95",
        "source": "conbackers",
        "target": "conjecture",
        "label": "Disclosed 2022 venture backing",
        "detail": "Launch names Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy, Sam Bankman-Fried. Amounts/current holdings unknown. No onward ControlAI transfer documented.",
        "date": "2022-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1b802ead5bff"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e96",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "conjecture",
      "label": "Former policy / strategy leadership",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022–2025 professional record",
      "sources": [
        "src-e7bf79d5bdc8"
      ],
      "summary": "2025 parliamentary biography describes former Head of Strategy and Governance. 2022 title was Head of AI Policy and Governance; not founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e96",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "conjecture",
        "label": "Former policy / strategy leadership",
        "detail": "2025 parliamentary biography describes former Head of Strategy and Governance. 2022 title was Head of AI Policy and Governance; not founder.",
        "date": "2022–2025 professional record",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e7bf79d5bdc8"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e97",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "conjecture",
      "label": "Operations work in 2025",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025",
      "sources": [
        "src-42725da209c6",
        "src-8638b6bbbdfc",
        "src-a96ee8404df0"
      ],
      "summary": "Self-description and May 2025 privacy notice. Conjecture work subsequently ended operationally per Leahy; no current continuity inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e97",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "conjecture",
        "label": "Operations work in 2025",
        "detail": "Self-description and May 2025 privacy notice. Conjecture work subsequently ended operationally per Leahy; no current continuity inferred.",
        "date": "2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
            "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-42725da209c6",
          "src-8638b6bbbdfc",
          "src-a96ee8404df0"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e98",
      "source": "controlaius",
      "target": "balde",
      "label": "Commissioned German lobbying",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Registered March 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-23397b6fa896",
        "src-f40ef2b0252e",
        "w1-controlai-s-german-us",
        "w1-controlai-s-german-balde"
      ],
      "summary": "Balde names Control AI US as its client in the official R007864 version2 declaration valid from 16 March 2026. Rechecked against official JSON on 8 September 2026; this is the same declaration, not independent corroboration. Zero client receipts refer to 2025 and do not establish 2026 payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e98",
        "source": "controlaius",
        "target": "balde",
        "label": "Commissioned German lobbying",
        "detail": "Balde names Control AI US as its client in the official R007864 version2 declaration valid from 16 March 2026. Rechecked against official JSON on 8 September 2026; this is the same declaration, not independent corroboration. Zero client receipts refer to 2025 and do not establish 2026 payment.",
        "date": "Registered March 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795"
          },
          {
            "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774"
          },
          {
            "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-23397b6fa896",
          "src-f40ef2b0252e",
          "w1-controlai-s-german-us",
          "w1-controlai-s-german-balde"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e99",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "controlcreators",
      "label": "Paid + unpaid creator collaborations",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-20",
      "sources": [
        "src-e996011534a6"
      ],
      "summary": "April 20 plan reports 14 collaborations, including Hank Green and Rational Animations. Individual paid/free classification, amounts and contractual rights not disclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e99",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "controlcreators",
        "label": "Paid + unpaid creator collaborations",
        "detail": "April 20 plan reports 14 collaborations, including Hank Green and Rational Animations. Individual paid/free classification, amounts and contractual rights not disclosed.",
        "date": "2026-04-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e996011534a6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e100",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "controlcreators",
      "label": "Briefing and script drafting/review",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Posting read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-604eca7e0531"
      ],
      "summary": "Employer posting describes partner recruitment, briefings and script work focused on extinction risk. £60k–£80k salary is advertised employee pay, not creator fees.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e100",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "controlcreators",
        "label": "Briefing and script drafting/review",
        "detail": "Employer posting describes partner recruitment, briefings and script work focused on extinction risk. £60k–£80k salary is advertised employee pay, not creator fees.",
        "date": "Posting read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
            "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-604eca7e0531"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e101",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "ukparliament",
      "label": "Briefings, support requests, drafting",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024–2026 reported strategy/activity",
      "sources": [
        "src-eb7a62848703",
        "src-22304018d7f5"
      ],
      "summary": "Published Direct Institutional Plan and impact report describe introductions, dinners, briefings, signatures and public statements; claimed conversion effects not independently audited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e101",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "ukparliament",
        "label": "Briefings, support requests, drafting",
        "detail": "Published Direct Institutional Plan and impact report describe introductions, dinners, briefings, signatures and public statements; claimed conversion effects not independently audited.",
        "date": "2024–2026 reported strategy/activity",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/dip"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
            "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-eb7a62848703",
          "src-22304018d7f5"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e102",
      "source": "controlcreators",
      "target": "ukparliament",
      "label": "described an intended constituent-pressure pathway to",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-20 plan",
      "sources": [
        "src-e996011534a6"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI describes creator/advertising work leading to lawmaker-contact tools and supporter lists. Intended mechanism; no causal attribution to a specific parliamentary act established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e102",
        "source": "controlcreators",
        "target": "ukparliament",
        "label": "described an intended constituent-pressure pathway to",
        "detail": "ControlAI describes creator/advertising work leading to lawmaker-contact tools and supporter lists. Intended mechanism; no causal attribution to a specific parliamentary act established.",
        "date": "2026-04-20 plan",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e996011534a6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e103",
      "source": "browne",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815",
        "src-f4fef5547775"
      ],
      "summary": "Current organizational advisory role; former UK Defence Secretary. Lords membership ended February 23, 2026.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e103",
        "source": "browne",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Adviser",
        "detail": "Current organizational advisory role; former UK Defence Secretary. Lords membership ended February 23, 2026.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI team",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e07be722d815",
          "src-f4fef5547775"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e104",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "browne",
      "label": "Emails encouraging parliamentary questions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-17",
      "sources": [
        "src-b2d0264369e7"
      ],
      "summary": "Browne's own March 2025 committee testimony says ControlAI and Logically regularly emailed and encouraged questions. No payment established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e104",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "browne",
        "label": "Emails encouraging parliamentary questions",
        "detail": "Browne's own March 2025 committee testimony says ControlAI and Logically regularly emailed and encouraged questions. No payment established.",
        "date": "2025-03-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b2d0264369e7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e105",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "hunt",
      "label": "Support acknowledged in Lords debate",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-01-29",
      "sources": [
        "src-5747555ff9d7"
      ],
      "summary": "Hunt thanked ControlAI when opening superintelligence moratorium debate; uptake rather than government adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e105",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "hunt",
        "label": "Support acknowledged in Lords debate",
        "detail": "Hunt thanked ControlAI when opening superintelligence moratorium debate; uptake rather than government adoption.",
        "date": "2026-01-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5747555ff9d7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e106",
      "source": "browne",
      "target": "ukparliament",
      "label": "Former member of House of Lords",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Until 2026-02-23",
      "sources": [
        "src-f4fef5547775"
      ],
      "summary": "Retirement recorded February 23, 2026. Do not display as current peer participation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e106",
        "source": "browne",
        "target": "ukparliament",
        "label": "Former member of House of Lords",
        "detail": "Retirement recorded February 23, 2026. Do not display as current peer participation.",
        "date": "Until 2026-02-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-f4fef5547775"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e107",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "ukparliament",
      "label": "Written evidence / professional biography",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-e7bf79d5bdc8"
      ],
      "summary": "September 2025 parliamentary source establishes submitted material and biography, not enacted recommendations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e107",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "ukparliament",
        "label": "Written evidence / professional biography",
        "detail": "September 2025 parliamentary source establishes submitted material and biography, not enacted recommendations.",
        "date": "2025-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e7bf79d5bdc8"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e108",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "asiuk",
      "label": "published proposed ASI prohibition text",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Draft captured 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-9982667e53da"
      ],
      "summary": "22-page download defines ASI through specified UK security harm and proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction and expert oversight. Separate from emergency-shutdown amendment; not enacted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e108",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "asiuk",
        "label": "published proposed ASI prohibition text",
        "detail": "22-page download defines ASI through specified UK security harm and proposes compute identity records, seizure/destruction and expert oversight. Separate from emergency-shutdown amendment; not enacted.",
        "date": "Draft captured 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
            "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9982667e53da"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e109",
      "source": "sobel",
      "target": "ukparliament",
      "label": "was scheduled to seek leave for an ASI bill in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-08 scheduled",
      "sources": [
        "src-b6e607a7fd65"
      ],
      "summary": "Official schedule is for a ten-minute-rule motion. At original Sep 5 cutoff not introduced/passed; exact introduced bill text not verified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e109",
        "source": "sobel",
        "target": "ukparliament",
        "label": "was scheduled to seek leave for an ASI bill in",
        "detail": "Official schedule is for a ten-minute-rule motion. At original Sep 5 cutoff not introduced/passed; exact introduced bill text not verified.",
        "date": "2026-09-08 scheduled",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
            "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b6e607a7fd65"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e110",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "nc12",
      "label": "backed the uncalled shutdown proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06; status checked 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-1bdb2fcb24d8",
        "src-b9795844a727"
      ],
      "summary": "Official NC12 status: Not called. Parliamentary attribution establishes advocacy, not adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e110",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "nc12",
        "label": "backed the uncalled shutdown proposal",
        "detail": "Official NC12 status: Not called. Parliamentary attribution establishes advocacy, not adoption.",
        "date": "2026-06; status checked 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1bdb2fcb24d8",
          "src-b9795844a727"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e111",
      "source": "sobel",
      "target": "nc12",
      "label": "sponsored the uncalled Commons proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06",
      "sources": [
        "src-1bdb2fcb24d8"
      ],
      "summary": "Official status Not called; not enacted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e111",
        "source": "sobel",
        "target": "nc12",
        "label": "sponsored the uncalled Commons proposal",
        "detail": "Official status Not called; not enacted.",
        "date": "2026-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1bdb2fcb24d8"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e112",
      "source": "hunt",
      "target": "am84",
      "label": "sponsored the unmoved amendment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07; checked 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-c401141d51b7"
      ],
      "summary": "Other sponsors Clement-Jones and Harding. Official status Not moved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e112",
        "source": "hunt",
        "target": "am84",
        "label": "sponsored the unmoved amendment",
        "detail": "Other sponsors Clement-Jones and Harding. Official status Not moved.",
        "date": "2026-07; checked 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c401141d51b7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e113",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "middlepowers",
      "label": "Coauthor",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-8efa5883d584"
      ],
      "summary": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e113",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "middlepowers",
        "label": "Coauthor",
        "detail": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
        "date": "2025-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8efa5883d584"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e114",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "middlepowers",
      "label": "Coauthor",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-8efa5883d584"
      ],
      "summary": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e114",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "middlepowers",
        "label": "Coauthor",
        "detail": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
        "date": "2025-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8efa5883d584"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e115",
      "source": "alfour",
      "target": "middlepowers",
      "label": "Coauthor",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-8efa5883d584"
      ],
      "summary": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e115",
        "source": "alfour",
        "target": "middlepowers",
        "label": "Coauthor",
        "detail": "November 2025 paper also coauthored by Alex Amadori; proposes state coalition, export controls/sanctions and specified self-defence redlines, not automatic obligation to wage war.",
        "date": "2025-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
            "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8efa5883d584"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e116",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "talos",
      "label": "Self-reported membership",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical; read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-42725da209c6"
      ],
      "summary": "Membership supported by personal site. Specific 2022 cohort detail less securely rendered; no donor earmarking for her fellowship established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e116",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "talos",
        "label": "Self-reported membership",
        "detail": "Membership supported by personal site. Specific 2022 cohort detail less securely rendered; no donor earmarking for her fellowship established.",
        "date": "Historical; read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-42725da209c6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e117",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "talos",
      "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-a69f9d4e2a03"
      ],
      "summary": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e117",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "talos",
        "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
        "detail": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
        "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a69f9d4e2a03"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e118",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "talos",
      "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-a69f9d4e2a03"
      ],
      "summary": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e118",
        "source": "coefficient",
        "target": "talos",
        "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
        "detail": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
        "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a69f9d4e2a03"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e119",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "talos",
      "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-a69f9d4e2a03"
      ],
      "summary": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e119",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "talos",
        "label": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
        "detail": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established.",
        "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a69f9d4e2a03"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e120",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "cfg",
      "label": "Former policy researcher",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Through 2025-01",
      "sources": [
        "src-42725da209c6"
      ],
      "summary": "Professional history dates CFG work end January 2025; no current employment inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e120",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "cfg",
        "label": "Former policy researcher",
        "detail": "Professional history dates CFG work end January 2025; no current employment inferred.",
        "date": "Through 2025-01",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
            "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-42725da209c6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e121",
      "source": "cfgfunders",
      "target": "cfg",
      "label": "Seed / general support disclosed",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-210ecbb4dfbb"
      ],
      "summary": "Dreamery and Tanka seed funding cover first five years baseline; Powoki also named general supporter. No amount or onward ControlAI transfer established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e121",
        "source": "cfgfunders",
        "target": "cfg",
        "label": "Seed / general support disclosed",
        "detail": "Dreamery and Tanka seed funding cover first five years baseline; Powoki also named general supporter. No amount or onward ControlAI transfer established.",
        "date": "Dates unspecified; read 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
            "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-210ecbb4dfbb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e122",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "cdi",
      "label": "Policy fellow",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-11e9bb8515f1",
        "src-7f2794f6a070"
      ],
      "summary": "October 2022 employer biography; CDI is part of ITIF.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e122",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "cdi",
        "label": "Policy fellow",
        "detail": "October 2022 employer biography; CDI is part of ITIF.",
        "date": "2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDI institutional identity",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-11e9bb8515f1",
          "src-7f2794f6a070"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e123",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "oecd",
      "label": "Prior fiscal-foresight work",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before October 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-11e9bb8515f1"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 employer biography; exact dates/pay not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e123",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "oecd",
        "label": "Prior fiscal-foresight work",
        "detail": "2022 employer biography; exact dates/pay not established.",
        "date": "Before October 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-11e9bb8515f1"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e124",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "bdi",
      "label": "Prior industrial-policy work",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before October 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-11e9bb8515f1"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 biography references industrial policy and Sino-European relations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e124",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "bdi",
        "label": "Prior industrial-policy work",
        "detail": "2022 biography references industrial policy and Sino-European relations.",
        "date": "Before October 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-11e9bb8515f1"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e125",
      "source": "behrens",
      "target": "eidproposal",
      "label": "Authored eID design position",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-10-18",
      "sources": [
        "src-4fe7b92dcece"
      ],
      "summary": "Argues for unique persistent identifiers in European electronic IDs on reliability/privacy grounds. Does not establish universal online identity or involvement in age-verification campaigns.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e125",
        "source": "behrens",
        "target": "eidproposal",
        "label": "Authored eID design position",
        "detail": "Argues for unique persistent identifiers in European electronic IDs on reliability/privacy grounds. Does not establish universal online identity or involvement in age-verification campaigns.",
        "date": "2022-10-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
            "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4fe7b92dcece"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e126",
      "source": "dodds",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Co-chair",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-5e4e930cec53"
      ],
      "summary": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e126",
        "source": "dodds",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Co-chair",
        "detail": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5e4e930cec53"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e127",
      "source": "russell",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Executive member",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-5e4e930cec53"
      ],
      "summary": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e127",
        "source": "russell",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Executive member",
        "detail": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5e4e930cec53"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e128",
      "source": "hedges",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Welsh Fabians executive representative",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-5e4e930cec53"
      ],
      "summary": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e128",
        "source": "hedges",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Welsh Fabians executive representative",
        "detail": "Live roster observed September 5, 2026 despite old URL slug. No appointment date inferred.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5e4e930cec53"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e129",
      "source": "asato",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Chair, 2012–2014",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2012–2014",
      "sources": [
        "src-dc138c91500c"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical leadership; no current executive authority inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e129",
        "source": "asato",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Chair, 2012–2014",
        "detail": "Historical leadership; no current executive authority inferred.",
        "date": "2012–2014",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Society history",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-dc138c91500c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e130",
      "source": "sobel",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Executive member, 2011–2012",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2011–2012",
      "sources": [
        "src-1bc441d0528b"
      ],
      "summary": "Original 2012 annual-report roster. Later publication relationship does not prove uninterrupted executive membership.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e130",
        "source": "sobel",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Executive member, 2011–2012",
        "detail": "Original 2012 annual-report roster. Later publication relationship does not prove uninterrupted executive membership.",
        "date": "2011–2012",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1bc441d0528b"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e131",
      "source": "knight",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Research advisory panel, 2017",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2017",
      "sources": [
        "src-dbb8d89ffb52"
      ],
      "summary": "Rural-Labour research panel met twice in 2017; report published March 2018.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e131",
        "source": "knight",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Research advisory panel, 2017",
        "detail": "Rural-Labour research panel met twice in 2017; report published March 2018.",
        "date": "2017",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-dbb8d89ffb52"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e132",
      "source": "lister",
      "target": "fabians",
      "label": "Named summit speaker",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-6dbd58c5e8f8"
      ],
      "summary": "Event participation only; vice-presidency unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e132",
        "source": "lister",
        "target": "fabians",
        "label": "Named summit speaker",
        "detail": "Event participation only; vice-presidency unverified.",
        "date": "2025-06-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
            "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-6dbd58c5e8f8"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e133",
      "source": "dodds",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e133",
        "source": "dodds",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e134",
      "source": "russell",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e134",
        "source": "russell",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e135",
      "source": "hedges",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e135",
        "source": "hedges",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e136",
      "source": "asato",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e136",
        "source": "asato",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e137",
      "source": "sobel",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e137",
        "source": "sobel",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e138",
      "source": "knight",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e138",
        "source": "knight",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e139",
      "source": "lister",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e139",
        "source": "lister",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e140",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-8e230246a046"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e140",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
            "url": "https://controlai.org/statement"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8e230246a046"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e141",
      "source": "browne",
      "target": "wef",
      "label": "Coauthored republished article",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2015-03-25",
      "sources": [
        "src-c7e428b699d3"
      ],
      "summary": "2015 Project Syndicate republication on WEF; WEF disclaimer of endorsement. Publication relation, not appointment or ControlAI partnership.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e141",
        "source": "browne",
        "target": "wef",
        "label": "Coauthored republished article",
        "detail": "2015 Project Syndicate republication on WEF; WEF disclaimer of endorsement. Publication relation, not appointment or ControlAI partnership.",
        "date": "2015-03-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c7e428b699d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e142",
      "source": "browne",
      "target": "nti",
      "label": "Vice-chair in 2017 event report",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2017",
      "sources": [
        "src-3db31f719414"
      ],
      "summary": "Report names institutional role but does not establish Browne attended or organized the cited WEF roundtable.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e142",
        "source": "browne",
        "target": "nti",
        "label": "Vice-chair in 2017 event report",
        "detail": "Report names institutional role but does not establish Browne attended or organized the cited WEF roundtable.",
        "date": "2017",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-3db31f719414"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e143",
      "source": "nti",
      "target": "wef",
      "label": "Co-hosted biological-risk roundtable",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2017-09-20",
      "sources": [
        "src-3db31f719414"
      ],
      "summary": "New York event September 20, 2017. No ControlAI connection or funding inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e143",
        "source": "nti",
        "target": "wef",
        "label": "Co-hosted biological-risk roundtable",
        "detail": "New York event September 20, 2017. No ControlAI connection or funding inferred.",
        "date": "2017-09-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
            "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-3db31f719414"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e144",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "ltf",
      "label": "$50m across two filed contributions",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-22; 2026-02-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-0f5ce69a6784",
        "src-6460d3b558f5"
      ],
      "summary": "$25m August 22, 2025 and $25m February 11, 2026. Partnership/member attributions are not extra contributions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e144",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "ltf",
        "label": "$50m across two filed contributions",
        "detail": "$25m August 22, 2025 and $25m February 11, 2026. Partnership/member attributions are not extra contributions.",
        "date": "2025-08-22; 2026-02-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0f5ce69a6784",
          "src-6460d3b558f5"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e145",
      "source": "gregbrockman",
      "target": "ltf",
      "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-12",
      "sources": [
        "src-0f5ce69a6784"
      ],
      "summary": "Filed September 12, 2025. Not an OpenAI corporate transfer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e145",
        "source": "gregbrockman",
        "target": "ltf",
        "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
        "detail": "Filed September 12, 2025. Not an OpenAI corporate transfer.",
        "date": "2025-09-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0f5ce69a6784"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e146",
      "source": "annabrockman",
      "target": "ltf",
      "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-12",
      "sources": [
        "src-0f5ce69a6784"
      ],
      "summary": "Filed September 12, 2025.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e146",
        "source": "annabrockman",
        "target": "ltf",
        "label": "$12.5m individual contribution",
        "detail": "Filed September 12, 2025.",
        "date": "2025-09-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0f5ce69a6784"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e147",
      "source": "ltf",
      "target": "othercommittees",
      "label": "$40m committee-transfer aggregate",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Through 2026-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "src-8806cf368b7f"
      ],
      "summary": "Reported through June 30, 2026; not a demonstrated Build American AI allocation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e147",
        "source": "ltf",
        "target": "othercommittees",
        "label": "$40m committee-transfer aggregate",
        "detail": "Reported through June 30, 2026; not a demonstrated Build American AI allocation.",
        "date": "Through 2026-06-30",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-8806cf368b7f"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e148",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "publicfirst",
      "label": "$40m total announced support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-21",
      "sources": [
        "src-9d9e4fbe80b2"
      ],
      "summary": "July 21, 2026 announcement restricts election spending. Not independently audited payment here; distinct from People First Marketing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e148",
        "source": "anthropic",
        "target": "publicfirst",
        "label": "$40m total announced support",
        "detail": "July 21, 2026 announcement restricts election spending. Not independently audited payment here; distinct from People First Marketing.",
        "date": "2026-07-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9d9e4fbe80b2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e149",
      "source": "ltf",
      "target": "buildai",
      "label": "Reported affiliation",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported before 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-90f14526fca6"
      ],
      "summary": "Secondary reporting; no transfer of named FEC donations traced to Build American AI.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e149",
        "source": "ltf",
        "target": "buildai",
        "label": "Reported affiliation",
        "detail": "Secondary reporting; no transfer of named FEC donations traced to Build American AI.",
        "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-90f14526fca6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e150",
      "source": "buildai",
      "target": "sm4",
      "label": "Reported intermediary pathway",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported before 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-90f14526fca6"
      ],
      "summary": "Secondary report describes creator solicitation route; donor-to-creator allocation untraced.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e150",
        "source": "buildai",
        "target": "sm4",
        "label": "Reported intermediary pathway",
        "detail": "Secondary report describes creator solicitation route; donor-to-creator allocation untraced.",
        "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-90f14526fca6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e151",
      "source": "sm4",
      "target": "pitchcreator",
      "label": "Reported $5,000 pitch",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported before 2026-09-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-90f14526fca6"
      ],
      "summary": "Offer only; completed payment unobserved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e151",
        "source": "sm4",
        "target": "pitchcreator",
        "label": "Reported $5,000 pitch",
        "detail": "Offer only; completed payment unobserved.",
        "date": "Reported before 2026-09-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-90f14526fca6"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e152",
      "source": "pierre-omidyar",
      "target": "omidyar",
      "label": "co-founded",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Biography read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-478c52027034"
      ],
      "summary": "Official biography names Pierre Omidyar as co-founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e152",
        "source": "pierre-omidyar",
        "target": "omidyar",
        "label": "co-founded",
        "detail": "Official biography names Pierre Omidyar as co-founder.",
        "date": "Biography read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar biography",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-478c52027034"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e153",
      "source": "omidyar",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "$600k paid · 2021",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021",
      "sources": [
        "src-81ff54e1c713"
      ],
      "summary": "General operating support paid during 2021; no earmarking to the lobbying contract established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e153",
        "source": "omidyar",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "$600k paid · 2021",
        "detail": "General operating support paid during 2021; no earmarking to the lobbying contract established.",
        "date": "2021",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-81ff54e1c713"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e154",
      "source": "omidyar",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "$850k paid · 2023",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-1e184fdc4ff9"
      ],
      "summary": "General operating support paid during 2023; this later payment cannot fund an earlier 2022 transaction without additional evidence.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e154",
        "source": "omidyar",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "$850k paid · 2023",
        "detail": "General operating support paid during 2023; this later payment cannot fund an earlier 2022 transaction without additional evidence.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1e184fdc4ff9"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e155",
      "source": "omidyar",
      "target": "ab2273",
      "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "15 Sep 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-1f9134b8bbcc"
      ],
      "summary": "Funder credits support with Reset for mobilisation and passage of California’s code.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e155",
        "source": "omidyar",
        "target": "ab2273",
        "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
        "detail": "Funder credits support with Reset for mobilisation and passage of California’s code.",
        "date": "15 Sep 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1f9134b8bbcc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e156",
      "source": "reset",
      "target": "ab2273",
      "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "15 Sep 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-1f9134b8bbcc"
      ],
      "summary": "Named by Omidyar as supporting the coalition; no amount assigned.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e156",
        "source": "reset",
        "target": "ab2273",
        "label": "Acknowledged coalition support",
        "detail": "Named by Omidyar as supporting the coalition; no amount assigned.",
        "date": "15 Sep 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
            "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1f9134b8bbcc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e157",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "capitol-connection",
      "label": "$50k · paid lobbying contract",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Services 2022; filed 27 Jun 2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae"
      ],
      "summary": "Contract for May-September2022 services at USD10,000/month; five USD10,000 receipts are reported over date ranges, not exact bank dates. Client owns contract work including drafts; specified nonpublic disclosure and expenses require consent/advance approval. No blanket editorial-approval clause or exercised output approval established. Neither a UK-government source nor the later2023 Oak award is established as this contract funding. Financial details: value: 50,000; currency: USD; kind: five registrant-reported receipts; period: Ranges June2-October4,2022 for May-September services; see filingp21",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e157",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "capitol-connection",
        "label": "$50k · paid lobbying contract",
        "detail": "Contract for May-September2022 services at USD10,000/month; five USD10,000 receipts are reported over date ranges, not exact bank dates. Client owns contract work including drafts; specified nonpublic disclosure and expenses require consent/advance approval. No blanket editorial-approval clause or exercised output approval established. Neither a UK-government source nor the later2023 Oak award is established as this contract funding.",
        "date": "Services 2022; filed 27 Jun 2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 50,000; currency: USD; kind: five registrant-reported receipts; period: Ranges June2-October4,2022 for May-September services; see filingp21"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e158",
      "source": "capitol-connection",
      "target": "ab2273",
      "label": "Lobbying and amendment negotiation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "May–September 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae",
        "w3-5r-s-material-19",
        "w3-5r-s-material-20",
        "w3-5r-s-material-26"
      ],
      "summary": "Registrant logs record actual background-sheet exchanges, proposed author amendments, coalition-letter submissions and negotiations in2022. Separately filed letters and California analyses supply work-product counterparts. Filing and transmission do not establish authorship or client approval of every item.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e158",
        "source": "capitol-connection",
        "target": "ab2273",
        "label": "Lobbying and amendment negotiation",
        "detail": "Registrant logs record actual background-sheet exchanges, proposed author amendments, coalition-letter submissions and negotiations in2022. Separately filed letters and California analyses supply work-product counterparts. Filing and transmission do not establish authorship or client approval of every item.",
        "date": "May–September 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae",
          "w3-5r-s-material-19",
          "w3-5r-s-material-20",
          "w3-5r-s-material-26"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e159",
      "source": "alan-parker",
      "target": "oak",
      "label": "Source of wealth / trustee",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 report",
      "sources": [
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak traces its resources to Duty Free Shoppers, which Parker helped build. 2023 report also lists him among trustees.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e159",
        "source": "alan-parker",
        "target": "oak",
        "label": "Source of wealth / trustee",
        "detail": "Oak traces its resources to Duty Free Shoppers, which Parker helped build. 2023 report also lists him among trustees.",
        "date": "2023 report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e160",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "$2m award / 3 years",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 report",
      "sources": [
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Core-support award in the 2023 report; not an annual payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e160",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "$2m award / 3 years",
        "detail": "Core-support award in the 2023 report; not an annual payment.",
        "date": "2023 report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e161",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "$2.368m award / 3 years",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 report",
      "sources": [
        "src-5046aaa630e7"
      ],
      "summary": "Exact award $2,368,421, core support. Not proof of a one-time cash receipt or the whole funding of WeProtect.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e161",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "$2.368m award / 3 years",
        "detail": "Exact award $2,368,421, core support. Not proof of a one-time cash receipt or the whole funding of WeProtect.",
        "date": "2025 report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5046aaa630e7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e162",
      "source": "prudence",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "£745,500 award · 2025–28",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Awarded 25 Sep 2025",
      "sources": [
        "src-33a85b0bc3bd"
      ],
      "summary": "Core work including legal standards, research, compliance and technical norms.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e162",
        "source": "prudence",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "£745,500 award · 2025–28",
        "detail": "Core work including legal standards, research, compliance and technical norms.",
        "date": "Awarded 25 Sep 2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-33a85b0bc3bd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e163",
      "source": "rothschild-foundation",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "£150k award · AI / EdTech",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Awarded 18 Jul 2025; planned 2025–28",
      "sources": [
        "src-421fa29c369c"
      ],
      "summary": "Research award; cash disbursement not verified. Historical zero disbursement field is not a current payment total.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e163",
        "source": "rothschild-foundation",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "£150k award · AI / EdTech",
        "detail": "Research award; cash disbursement not verified. Historical zero disbursement field is not a current payment total.",
        "date": "Awarded 18 Jul 2025; planned 2025–28",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
            "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-421fa29c369c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e164",
      "source": "cross-street-films",
      "target": "kidron",
      "label": "Declared parliamentary assistance",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Register read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-576f1b1b6fa2"
      ],
      "summary": "Employees/offices provide parliamentary assistance; register does not attribute it to the AI amendment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e164",
        "source": "cross-street-films",
        "target": "kidron",
        "label": "Declared parliamentary assistance",
        "detail": "Employees/offices provide parliamentary assistance; register does not attribute it to the AI amendment.",
        "date": "Register read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-576f1b1b6fa2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e165",
      "source": "common-sense-media",
      "target": "kidron",
      "label": "Declared paid summit travel",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22–24 Mar 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-576f1b1b6fa2"
      ],
      "summary": "March 2026 summit travel; not support earmarked to ControlAI.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e165",
        "source": "common-sense-media",
        "target": "kidron",
        "label": "Declared paid summit travel",
        "detail": "March 2026 summit travel; not support earmarked to ControlAI.",
        "date": "22–24 Mar 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-576f1b1b6fa2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e166",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Historical sole donor · 2021",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021 strategy",
      "sources": [
        "src-c2da4caaaa8e"
      ],
      "summary": "UK strategy describes sole financial donor status up to that point. Subsequent donors mean this is not a current sole-funder claim. Amount not specified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e166",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Historical sole donor · 2021",
        "detail": "UK strategy describes sole financial donor status up to that point. Subsequent donors mean this is not a current sole-funder claim. Amount not specified.",
        "date": "2021 strategy",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c2da4caaaa8e"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e167",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Permanent board seat",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021 strategy; board read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-c2da4caaaa8e",
        "src-953ce6b745ed"
      ],
      "summary": "Government records a permanent seat; current board page includes Home Office representation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e167",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Permanent board seat",
        "detail": "Government records a permanent seat; current board page includes Home Office representation.",
        "date": "2021 strategy; board read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c2da4caaaa8e",
          "src-953ce6b745ed"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e168",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Board representation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-953ce6b745ed"
      ],
      "summary": "Published governance page records institutional board participation; distinct from ownership.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e168",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Board representation",
        "detail": "Published governance page records institutional board participation; distinct from ownership.",
        "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-953ce6b745ed"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e169",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Briefed board on EU proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "11–12 Jul 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-2af30dede1cb"
      ],
      "summary": "July 2022 minutes record a Commission briefing to the WeProtect board and possible requests for assistance. Particular requests and resulting outputs are not established by this record.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e169",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Briefed board on EU proposal",
        "detail": "July 2022 minutes record a Commission briefing to the WeProtect board and possible requests for assistance. Particular requests and resulting outputs are not established by this record.",
        "date": "11–12 Jul 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-2af30dede1cb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e170",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
      "label": "Planned accessible advocacy material",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "11–12 Jul 2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-2af30dede1cb"
      ],
      "summary": "Board discussion and Secretariat intention recorded in July 2022. Separate later records establish an actual published consultation and campaign participation; this minute alone does not establish delivery.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e170",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
        "label": "Planned accessible advocacy material",
        "detail": "Board discussion and Secretariat intention recorded in July 2022. Separate later records establish an actual published consultation and campaign participation; this minute alone does not establish delivery.",
        "date": "11–12 Jul 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-2af30dede1cb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e171",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Institutional board representation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-953ce6b745ed"
      ],
      "summary": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e171",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Institutional board representation",
        "detail": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
        "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-953ce6b745ed"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e172",
      "source": "snap",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Institutional board representation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-953ce6b745ed"
      ],
      "summary": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e172",
        "source": "snap",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Institutional board representation",
        "detail": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
        "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-953ce6b745ed"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e173",
      "source": "thorn",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Institutional board representation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-953ce6b745ed"
      ],
      "summary": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e173",
        "source": "thorn",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Institutional board representation",
        "detail": "Current published board participation, not an ownership share or evidence of a campaign-specific payment.",
        "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-953ce6b745ed"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e174",
      "source": "casir",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "claimed membership of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-50b299128d80",
        "src-5c7f3011d794"
      ],
      "summary": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e174",
        "source": "casir",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "claimed membership of",
        "detail": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
        "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-50b299128d80",
          "src-5c7f3011d794"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e175",
      "source": "casir",
      "target": "torchbearer",
      "label": "claimed membership of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-50b299128d80",
        "src-5c7f3011d794"
      ],
      "summary": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e175",
        "source": "casir",
        "target": "torchbearer",
        "label": "claimed membership of",
        "detail": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
        "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-50b299128d80",
          "src-5c7f3011d794"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e176",
      "source": "casir",
      "target": "pauseai-us",
      "label": "claimed membership of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-50b299128d80",
        "src-5c7f3011d794"
      ],
      "summary": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e176",
        "source": "casir",
        "target": "pauseai-us",
        "label": "claimed membership of",
        "detail": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found.",
        "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-50b299128d80",
          "src-5c7f3011d794"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e177",
      "source": "casir",
      "target": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
      "label": "claimed a partnership with",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-50b299128d80"
      ],
      "summary": "Unfinished and unincorporated proposal. Affiliation is not reciprocally authenticated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e177",
        "source": "casir",
        "target": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
        "label": "claimed a partnership with",
        "detail": "Unfinished and unincorporated proposal. Affiliation is not reciprocally authenticated.",
        "date": "Site read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
            "url": "https://casir.org/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-50b299128d80"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e178",
      "source": "asi-message-grants",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "used its plan as a reference in the draft grant design",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-5c7f3011d794"
      ],
      "summary": "CASIR says its grant committee would initially reflect ControlAI’s institutional plan. This is CASIR’s proposed design, not verified ControlAI direction of an operating fund.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e178",
        "source": "asi-message-grants",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "used its plan as a reference in the draft grant design",
        "detail": "CASIR says its grant committee would initially reflect ControlAI’s institutional plan. This is CASIR’s proposed design, not verified ControlAI direction of an operating fund.",
        "date": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft governance",
            "url": "https://casir.org/governance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5c7f3011d794"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e179",
      "source": "casir",
      "target": "asi-message-grants",
      "label": "proposed eligibility and grant conditions for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-1f84b8a8e5b4"
      ],
      "summary": "Explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% to its member category, and possible review/recovery of unspent funds. No executed grants.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e179",
        "source": "casir",
        "target": "asi-message-grants",
        "label": "proposed eligibility and grant conditions for",
        "detail": "Explicit ASI-extinction messaging, at least 65% to its member category, and possible review/recovery of unspent funds. No executed grants.",
        "date": "Draft read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CASIR draft charter",
            "url": "https://casir.org/charter"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-1f84b8a8e5b4"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e180",
      "source": "ogara",
      "target": "longview",
      "label": "AI Program Officer",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Read 5 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-9537facf4ef2"
      ],
      "summary": "Official team page read in the September 5 investigation; no grant to CAIS inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e180",
        "source": "ogara",
        "target": "longview",
        "label": "AI Program Officer",
        "detail": "Official team page read in the September 5 investigation; no grant to CAIS inferred.",
        "date": "Read 5 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9537facf4ef2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e181",
      "source": "ogara",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "Affiliation on 2023 paper",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-ac43e1b525d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical author affiliation, not a verified present job or funding relationship.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e181",
        "source": "ogara",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "Affiliation on 2023 paper",
        "detail": "Historical author affiliation, not a verified present job or funding relationship.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ac43e1b525d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e182",
      "source": "ogara",
      "target": "ai-deception-paper",
      "label": "Coauthor / origin-authentication proposals",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-ac43e1b525d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Section 4.2 discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures distinguishing AI and human content.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e182",
        "source": "ogara",
        "target": "ai-deception-paper",
        "label": "Coauthor / origin-authentication proposals",
        "detail": "Section 4.2 discusses disclosure, watermarking and signatures distinguishing AI and human content.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ac43e1b525d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e183",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Institutional board representation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-953ce6b745ed"
      ],
      "summary": "Current governance page includes eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant; separate from WEF’s policy work.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e183",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Institutional board representation",
        "detail": "Current governance page includes eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant; separate from WEF’s policy work.",
        "date": "Read 7 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect governance",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-953ce6b745ed"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e184",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "wef-safety-principles",
      "label": "Named working-group participant",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-01-09",
      "sources": [
        "src-a82329c94eac"
      ],
      "summary": "Google appears in the WEF principles working group and separately has WeProtect board representation. Neither relationship alone proves campaign funding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e184",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "wef-safety-principles",
        "label": "Named working-group participant",
        "detail": "Google appears in the WEF principles working group and separately has WeProtect board representation. Neither relationship alone proves campaign funding.",
        "date": "2023-01-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a82329c94eac"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e185",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "longview",
      "label": "$595,426 indexed awards · Jan 2024",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January 2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-4cc57af3ad93"
      ],
      "summary": "Two recommended effective-giving information-sharing grants. Corroborated by an indexed first-party historical table; direct individual records redirected or could not be reopened. Not verified cash receipts or grant conditions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e185",
        "source": "goodventures",
        "target": "longview",
        "label": "$595,426 indexed awards · Jan 2024",
        "detail": "Two recommended effective-giving information-sharing grants. Corroborated by an indexed first-party historical table; direct individual records redirected or could not be reopened. Not verified cash receipts or grant conditions.",
        "date": "January 2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4cc57af3ad93"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e186",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "longview",
      "label": "$15.163m indexed award · Oct 2024",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "October 2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
      ],
      "summary": "Exact figure $15,162,840 for general support. Corroborated by indexed first-party data; direct grant pages redirected and one table open failed. Not cash-receipt proof, not funding of Australian age assurance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e186",
        "source": "goodventures",
        "target": "longview",
        "label": "$15.163m indexed award · Oct 2024",
        "detail": "Exact figure $15,162,840 for general support. Corroborated by indexed first-party data; direct grant pages redirected and one table open failed. Not cash-receipt proof, not funding of Australian age assurance.",
        "date": "October 2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e187",
      "source": "hendrycks",
      "target": "ai-deception-paper",
      "label": "Coauthor",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-ac43e1b525d3"
      ],
      "summary": "Named author on the 2023 AI Deception paper, alongside Aidan O’Gara. The recommendations do not establish participation in Australian identity policy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e187",
        "source": "hendrycks",
        "target": "ai-deception-paper",
        "label": "Coauthor",
        "detail": "Named author on the 2023 AI Deception paper, alongside Aidan O’Gara. The recommendations do not establish participation in Australian identity policy.",
        "date": "2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ac43e1b525d3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e188",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "dma",
      "label": "described planned aggregate support of up to $100k/month for",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Programme page read 5 Sep 2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-0448f8be81b7"
      ],
      "summary": "Aggregate planned funding across Digital Media Accelerator projects, not actual monthly or annual expenditure or a specific creator payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e188",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "dma",
        "label": "described planned aggregate support of up to $100k/month for",
        "detail": "Aggregate planned funding across Digital Media Accelerator projects, not actual monthly or annual expenditure or a specific creator payment.",
        "date": "Programme page read 5 Sep 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0448f8be81b7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e63a",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "$5,160,000 · Historical grant award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-11",
      "sources": [
        "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
      ],
      "summary": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Financial details: value: 5,160,000; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2022-11 Amount basis: indexed award",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e63a",
        "source": "goodventures",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "$5,160,000 · Historical grant award",
        "detail": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship.",
        "date": "2022-11",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,160,000; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2022-11"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "indexed award"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e63b",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "$1,433,000 · Historical grant award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-02",
      "sources": [
        "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
      ],
      "summary": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Financial details: value: 1,433,000; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2023-02 Amount basis: indexed award",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e63b",
        "source": "goodventures",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "$1,433,000 · Historical grant award",
        "detail": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship.",
        "date": "2023-02",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,433,000; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2023-02"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "indexed award"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e63c",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "$4,025,729 · Historical grant award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-04",
      "sources": [
        "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
      ],
      "summary": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Financial details: value: 4,025,729; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2023-04 Amount basis: indexed award",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e63c",
        "source": "goodventures",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "$4,025,729 · Historical grant award",
        "detail": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship.",
        "date": "2023-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 4,025,729; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2023-04"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "indexed award"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "e63d",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "$1,866,559 · Exit grant award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-10",
      "sources": [
        "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
      ],
      "summary": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Source identifies this as an exit grant. Financial details: value: 1,866,559; currency: USD; kind: exit grant award; period: 2023-10 Amount basis: indexed award",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "e63d",
        "source": "goodventures",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "$1,866,559 · Exit grant award",
        "detail": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Source identifies this as an exit grant.",
        "date": "2023-10",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
            "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b4a2b9e3261c"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,866,559; currency: USD; kind: exit grant award; period: 2023-10"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "indexed award"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n01",
      "source": "singh",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Executive director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
      ],
      "summary": "Named on Frame's official team page.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n01",
        "source": "singh",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Executive director",
        "detail": "Named on Frame's official team page.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n02",
      "source": "singh",
      "target": "cais",
      "label": "Earlier creator campaigns reported",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Late 2025, retrospective 2026-06-12",
      "sources": [
        "src-6df46b543f84"
      ],
      "summary": "Singh describes conducting creator events/campaigns with CAIS after moving to San Francisco. Specific briefs, payments and editorial terms were not recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n02",
        "source": "singh",
        "target": "cais",
        "label": "Earlier creator campaigns reported",
        "detail": "Singh describes conducting creator events/campaigns with CAIS after moving to San Francisco. Specific briefs, payments and editorial terms were not recovered.",
        "date": "Late 2025, retrospective 2026-06-12",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-6df46b543f84"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n03",
      "source": "austin-chen",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Adviser; cofounding described",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08; retrospective 2026-06-12",
      "sources": [
        "src-ed3d2ac6a354",
        "src-6df46b543f84"
      ],
      "summary": "Frame lists Chen as adviser. Singh's firsthand retrospective says they started the fellowship together.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n03",
        "source": "austin-chen",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Adviser; cofounding described",
        "detail": "Frame lists Chen as adviser. Singh's firsthand retrospective says they started the fellowship together.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08; retrospective 2026-06-12",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          },
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ed3d2ac6a354",
          "src-6df46b543f84"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n04",
      "source": "austin-chen",
      "target": "manifund",
      "label": "Cofounder listed",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
      ],
      "summary": "Frame identifies his Manifund role alongside his advisory role.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n04",
        "source": "austin-chen",
        "target": "manifund",
        "label": "Cofounder listed",
        "detail": "Frame identifies his Manifund role alongside his advisory role.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n05",
      "source": "ryan-kidd",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Adviser listed",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
      ],
      "summary": "Frame names Kidd, identifying his MATS co-executive director role.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n05",
        "source": "ryan-kidd",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Adviser listed",
        "detail": "Frame names Kidd, identifying his MATS co-executive director role.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n06",
      "source": "drew-spartz",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Adviser listed",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
      ],
      "summary": "Frame names Spartz as adviser.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n06",
        "source": "drew-spartz",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Adviser listed",
        "detail": "Frame names Spartz as adviser.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame: mission and team",
            "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-ed3d2ac6a354"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n07",
      "source": "mozie",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Recruitment engagement reported",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated case study, observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-7e9b476e322d"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor describes targeted invitations for the second cohort. The fee and executed agreement are unavailable; vendor metrics are not independently audited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n07",
        "source": "mozie",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Recruitment engagement reported",
        "detail": "Vendor describes targeted invitations for the second cohort. The fee and executed agreement are unavailable; vendor metrics are not independently audited.",
        "date": "Undated case study, observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-7e9b476e322d"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n08",
      "source": "frame-selection",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Selection authority reported",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Second cohort; observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-7e9b476e322d"
      ],
      "summary": "Mozie explicitly assigns acceptance decisions to Frame's committee. Committee names and rubric were not recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n08",
        "source": "frame-selection",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Selection authority reported",
        "detail": "Mozie explicitly assigns acceptance decisions to Frame's committee. Committee names and rubric were not recovered.",
        "date": "Second cohort; observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
            "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-7e9b476e322d"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n09",
      "source": "mox",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "In-house incubation reported",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Fundraiser created 2026-03-06",
      "sources": [
        "src-685569dc8514"
      ],
      "summary": "Mox's fundraiser describes Frame as developed in-house and outlines shared workspace/event/operational support. Exact Frame cost allocation is unavailable.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n09",
        "source": "mox",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "In-house incubation reported",
        "detail": "Mox's fundraiser describes Frame as developed in-house and outlines shared workspace/event/operational support. Exact Frame cost allocation is unavailable.",
        "date": "Fundraiser created 2026-03-06",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-685569dc8514"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n10",
      "source": "manifund",
      "target": "mox",
      "label": "$500,000 grant funding reported",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser",
      "sources": [
        "src-685569dc8514"
      ],
      "summary": "Mox's approximate budget identifies this historical grant-funding line. It is not a Frame-specific grant or audited cash receipt. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser Amount basis: recipient reported grant",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n10",
        "source": "manifund",
        "target": "mox",
        "label": "$500,000 grant funding reported",
        "detail": "Mox's approximate budget identifies this historical grant-funding line. It is not a Frame-specific grant or audited cash receipt.",
        "date": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-685569dc8514"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 500,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "recipient reported grant"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n11",
      "source": "craig-eaif",
      "target": "mox",
      "label": "$300,000 combined funding reported",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser",
      "sources": [
        "src-685569dc8514"
      ],
      "summary": "Mox groups Craig Falls and EAIF under one grant total; do not assign $300,000 to each. Financial details: value: 300,000; currency: USD; kind: reported combined grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser Amount basis: recipient reported combined grant",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n11",
        "source": "craig-eaif",
        "target": "mox",
        "label": "$300,000 combined funding reported",
        "detail": "Mox groups Craig Falls and EAIF under one grant total; do not assign $300,000 to each.",
        "date": "Budget published in 2026 fundraiser",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-685569dc8514"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 300,000; currency: USD; kind: reported combined grant funding; period: Budget published in 2026 fundraiser"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "recipient reported combined grant"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n12",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "mox",
      "label": "$20,000 for Mox via Manifund",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date",
      "sources": [
        "src-685569dc8514"
      ],
      "summary": "The fundraiser displays an SFF donation and Chen states Manifund received a speculation grant for Mox. This is a public transaction report, not a bank statement. Financial details: value: 20,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant receipt; period: Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date Amount basis: platform reported credit",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n12",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "mox",
        "label": "$20,000 for Mox via Manifund",
        "detail": "The fundraiser displays an SFF donation and Chen states Manifund received a speculation grant for Mox. This is a public transaction report, not a bank statement.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-685569dc8514"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 20,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant receipt; period: Observed 2026-09-08; comment gives relative date"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "platform reported credit"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n13",
      "source": "manifund",
      "target": "grantmaking-ai",
      "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payouts",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-27738cfd6708"
      ],
      "summary": "Chen's July 8 announcement identifies Manifund's administration role for the funding round.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n13",
        "source": "manifund",
        "target": "grantmaking-ai",
        "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payouts",
        "detail": "Chen's July 8 announcement identifies Manifund's administration role for the funding round.",
        "date": "2026-07-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-27738cfd6708"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n14",
      "source": "ryan-kidd",
      "target": "grantmaking-ai",
      "label": "Initial reviewer named",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-27738cfd6708"
      ],
      "summary": "Chen names Kidd, Gavin Leech and Marcus Abramovitch as initial reviewers. No specific application assignment established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n14",
        "source": "ryan-kidd",
        "target": "grantmaking-ai",
        "label": "Initial reviewer named",
        "detail": "Chen names Kidd, Gavin Leech and Marcus Abramovitch as initial reviewers. No specific application assignment established.",
        "date": "2026-07-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
            "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-27738cfd6708"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n15",
      "source": "frame",
      "target": "frame-amplifier",
      "label": "announced an embedded-creator track",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-12 announcement",
      "sources": [
        "src-6df46b543f84"
      ],
      "summary": "Singh offers to place promising fellows inside partner organizations to amplify their messages. Implementation and terms vary and are not established by the announcement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n15",
        "source": "frame",
        "target": "frame-amplifier",
        "label": "announced an embedded-creator track",
        "detail": "Singh offers to place promising fellows inside partner organizations to amplify their messages. Implementation and terms vary and are not established by the announcement.",
        "date": "2026-06-12 announcement",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
            "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-6df46b543f84"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n16",
      "source": "eclag",
      "target": "child-safety-on",
      "label": "Participating campaign coalition",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb",
        "src-cda852240051"
      ],
      "summary": "Campaign identifies ECLAG within its coalition; ECLAG supplies shared lawmaker-facing messages.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n16",
        "source": "eclag",
        "target": "child-safety-on",
        "label": "Participating campaign coalition",
        "detail": "Campaign identifies ECLAG within its coalition; ECLAG supplies shared lawmaker-facing messages.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb",
          "src-cda852240051"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n17",
      "source": "ecpat",
      "target": "eclag",
      "label": "Steering-group member listed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb"
      ],
      "summary": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n17",
        "source": "ecpat",
        "target": "eclag",
        "label": "Steering-group member listed",
        "detail": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n18",
      "source": "eurochild",
      "target": "eclag",
      "label": "Steering-group member listed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb"
      ],
      "summary": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n18",
        "source": "eurochild",
        "target": "eclag",
        "label": "Steering-group member listed",
        "detail": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n19",
      "source": "missing-children-europe",
      "target": "eclag",
      "label": "Steering-group member listed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb"
      ],
      "summary": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n19",
        "source": "missing-children-europe",
        "target": "eclag",
        "label": "Steering-group member listed",
        "detail": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n20",
      "source": "iwf",
      "target": "eclag",
      "label": "Steering-group member listed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb"
      ],
      "summary": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n20",
        "source": "iwf",
        "target": "eclag",
        "label": "Steering-group member listed",
        "detail": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n21",
      "source": "terre-des-hommes",
      "target": "eclag",
      "label": "Steering-group member listed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb"
      ],
      "summary": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n21",
        "source": "terre-des-hommes",
        "target": "eclag",
        "label": "Steering-group member listed",
        "detail": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n22",
      "source": "thorn",
      "target": "eclag",
      "label": "Steering-group member listed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-808a0af999fb"
      ],
      "summary": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n22",
        "source": "thorn",
        "target": "eclag",
        "label": "Steering-group member listed",
        "detail": "Current ECLAG page identifies this steering role. Current roster is not automatically the April 2022 founding roster.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-808a0af999fb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n23",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "child-safety-on",
      "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-cda852240051"
      ],
      "summary": "5Rights appears among the campaign's supporter links. Support does not establish steering rights or funding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n23",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "child-safety-on",
        "label": "Listed campaign supporter",
        "detail": "5Rights appears among the campaign's supporter links. Support does not establish steering rights or funding.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-cda852240051"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n24",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "child-safety-on",
      "label": "Campaign launch recorded",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Hub updated 2023-01-10; current campaign observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-306689bfa358",
        "src-cda852240051"
      ],
      "summary": "WeProtect's hub records launching #ChildSafetyOnlineNow with 13 other organizations; the current campaign uses Child Safety ON branding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n24",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "child-safety-on",
        "label": "Campaign launch recorded",
        "detail": "WeProtect's hub records launching #ChildSafetyOnlineNow with 13 other organizations; the current campaign uses Child Safety ON branding.",
        "date": "Hub updated 2023-01-10; current campaign observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
            "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-306689bfa358",
          "src-cda852240051"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n25",
      "source": "wp-secretariat",
      "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
      "label": "Published supporting consultation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12",
      "sources": [
        "src-12639f108d96"
      ],
      "summary": "The published submission supports detection obligations and safeguards. It expressly need not represent the membership's positions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n25",
        "source": "wp-secretariat",
        "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
        "label": "Published supporting consultation",
        "detail": "The published submission supports detection obligations and safeguards. It expressly need not represent the membership's positions.",
        "date": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-12639f108d96"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n26",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "wp-secretariat",
      "label": "Alliance Secretariat; authorship scope stated",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12",
      "sources": [
        "src-12639f108d96"
      ],
      "summary": "Submission identifies the Secretariat as the authoring constituency; membership is not blanket endorsement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n26",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "wp-secretariat",
        "label": "Alliance Secretariat; authorship scope stated",
        "detail": "Submission identifies the Secretariat as the authoring constituency; membership is not blanket endorsement.",
        "date": "Consultation undated; membership figures as of 2022-09-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-12639f108d96"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n27",
      "source": "wp-coo",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Manages expenditure and assets",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-9e1956e1c0db"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy Plan assigns financial management to the COO under the executive director's authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n27",
        "source": "wp-coo",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Manages expenditure and assets",
        "detail": "Policy Plan assigns financial management to the COO under the executive director's authority.",
        "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9e1956e1c0db"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n28",
      "source": "wp-ed",
      "target": "wp-coo",
      "label": "Authority over financial management",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-9e1956e1c0db"
      ],
      "summary": "Role allocation in Policy Plan; no inference about an unobserved specific expenditure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n28",
        "source": "wp-ed",
        "target": "wp-coo",
        "label": "Authority over financial management",
        "detail": "Role allocation in Policy Plan; no inference about an unobserved specific expenditure.",
        "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9e1956e1c0db"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n29",
      "source": "wp-coo",
      "target": "wp-frac",
      "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-9e1956e1c0db"
      ],
      "summary": "Financial accountability relation stated in Policy Plan.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n29",
        "source": "wp-coo",
        "target": "wp-frac",
        "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
        "detail": "Financial accountability relation stated in Policy Plan.",
        "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9e1956e1c0db"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n30",
      "source": "wp-ed",
      "target": "wp-frac",
      "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-9e1956e1c0db"
      ],
      "summary": "Executive director accountability stated in Policy Plan.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n30",
        "source": "wp-ed",
        "target": "wp-frac",
        "label": "Accountable to FRAC",
        "detail": "Executive director accountability stated in Policy Plan.",
        "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9e1956e1c0db"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n31",
      "source": "wp-frac",
      "target": "wp-boards",
      "label": "Reports to both boards",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-9e1956e1c0db"
      ],
      "summary": "FRAC reports to the Stichting Management Board and Policy Board.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n31",
        "source": "wp-frac",
        "target": "wp-boards",
        "label": "Reports to both boards",
        "detail": "FRAC reports to the Stichting Management Board and Policy Board.",
        "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9e1956e1c0db"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n32",
      "source": "wp-development",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Fundraising advice and support",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
      "sources": [
        "src-9e1956e1c0db"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy Plan discloses an unpaid Development Committee and dedicated fundraising function established in 2023.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n32",
        "source": "wp-development",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Fundraising advice and support",
        "detail": "Policy Plan discloses an unpaid Development Committee and dedicated fundraising function established in 2023.",
        "date": "Policy Plan 2023–25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-9e1956e1c0db"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n33",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Briefed board on five-country work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June 2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-3bc8f45060eb"
      ],
      "summary": "June 2024 minutes record the Home Office update and an August response timeframe for early September ministerial meetings in Australia. Final briefings/adoption not recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n33",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Briefed board on five-country work",
        "detail": "June 2024 minutes record the Home Office update and an August response timeframe for early September ministerial meetings in Australia. Final briefings/adoption not recovered.",
        "date": "June 2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-3bc8f45060eb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n34",
      "source": "five-country-working-group",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "Subject of Home Office briefing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June 2024",
      "sources": [
        "src-3bc8f45060eb"
      ],
      "summary": "WeProtect's minutes describe Five Country Working Group principles through a Home Office presentation; no separate direct Working Group-to-WeProtect interaction is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n34",
        "source": "five-country-working-group",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "Subject of Home Office briefing",
        "detail": "WeProtect's minutes describe Five Country Working Group principles through a Home Office presentation; no separate direct Working Group-to-WeProtect interaction is established.",
        "date": "June 2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-3bc8f45060eb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n35",
      "source": "pa-consulting",
      "target": "global-threat-assessment",
      "label": "Research briefing recorded",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June 2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-718684d59ccd"
      ],
      "summary": "Natalia Greene of PA Consulting briefed WeProtect's board on progress of the next Global Threat Assessment. A completed report or commissioning contract is not established by this minute.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n35",
        "source": "pa-consulting",
        "target": "global-threat-assessment",
        "label": "Research briefing recorded",
        "detail": "Natalia Greene of PA Consulting briefed WeProtect's board on progress of the next Global Threat Assessment. A completed report or commissioning contract is not established by this minute.",
        "date": "June 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-718684d59ccd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n36",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "global-threat-assessment",
      "label": "Board feedback on scope recorded",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June 2023",
      "sources": [
        "src-718684d59ccd"
      ],
      "summary": "Minutes record comments on coverage, categories and safeguarding. A feedback interface does not prove findings were dictated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n36",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "global-threat-assessment",
        "label": "Board feedback on scope recorded",
        "detail": "Minutes record comments on coverage, categories and safeguarding. A feedback interface does not prove findings were dictated.",
        "date": "June 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-718684d59ccd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n37",
      "source": "stripe-bank-reference",
      "target": "stripe",
      "label": "Bank restriction relayed by itch",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 31, 2025 post; subsequently edited",
      "sources": [
        "src-094404b86089"
      ],
      "summary": "itch says Stripe asked it to convey that banking partners constrained sexually explicit content despite card-network support for appropriately registered adult content. Bank identity and original instruction missing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n37",
        "source": "stripe-bank-reference",
        "target": "stripe",
        "label": "Bank restriction relayed by itch",
        "detail": "itch says Stripe asked it to convey that banking partners constrained sexually explicit content despite card-network support for appropriately registered adult content. Bank identity and original instruction missing.",
        "date": "July 31, 2025 post; subsequently edited",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-094404b86089"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n38",
      "source": "stripe",
      "target": "itch-io",
      "label": "Adult-content payment restriction reported",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2025",
      "sources": [
        "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
        "src-094404b86089"
      ],
      "summary": "itch identifies Stripe as its card processor and reports a sexual-gratification content definition and payment suspension.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n38",
        "source": "stripe",
        "target": "itch-io",
        "label": "Adult-content payment restriction reported",
        "detail": "itch identifies Stripe as its card processor and reports a sexual-gratification content definition and payment suspension.",
        "date": "July 2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
          "src-094404b86089"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n39",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "itch-io",
      "label": "Platform payout dependency reported",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-28 addendum",
      "sources": [
        "src-82c15a7cd2b7"
      ],
      "summary": "itch explains why losing PayPal would threaten payouts across its platform. This is not a recovered PayPal takedown order.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n39",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "itch-io",
        "label": "Platform payout dependency reported",
        "detail": "itch explains why losing PayPal would threaten payouts across its platform. This is not a recovered PayPal takedown order.",
        "date": "2025-07-28 addendum",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
            "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-82c15a7cd2b7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n40",
      "source": "itch-io",
      "target": "itch-reindex",
      "label": "No Payments condition published",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-31 published update",
      "sources": [
        "src-094404b86089"
      ],
      "summary": "The July 31 update required disabling payments for the described free-content reindexing. Current post has edits; original snapshot not recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n40",
        "source": "itch-io",
        "target": "itch-reindex",
        "label": "No Payments condition published",
        "detail": "The July 31 update required disabling payments for the described free-content reindexing. Current post has edits; original snapshot not recovered.",
        "date": "2025-07-31 published update",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-094404b86089"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n41",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "mc-acquirers",
      "label": "Network compliance obligations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Rules dated 2025-06-03; §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
      "sources": [
        "src-767c5b45b782"
      ],
      "summary": "Pre-event rules assign acquirer responsibilities and provide brand-harm enforcement measures. No incident-specific notice or penalty recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n41",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "mc-acquirers",
        "label": "Network compliance obligations",
        "detail": "Pre-event rules assign acquirer responsibilities and provide brand-harm enforcement measures. No incident-specific notice or penalty recovered.",
        "date": "Rules dated 2025-06-03; §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-767c5b45b782"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n42",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "mastercard-statement",
      "label": "Denied directing game restrictions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-01",
      "sources": [
        "src-547a5b3ea786"
      ],
      "summary": "Mastercard's published response denies evaluating games or requiring restrictions on game platforms. This does not identify the downstream decision-maker.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n42",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "mastercard-statement",
        "label": "Denied directing game restrictions",
        "detail": "Mastercard's published response denies evaluating games or requiring restrictions on game platforms. This does not identify the downstream decision-maker.",
        "date": "2025-08-01",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-547a5b3ea786"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n43",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "cais-reserve",
      "label": "$5,259,802 potential-refund reserve",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Year ended 2023-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "src-b1a700934b28"
      ],
      "summary": "2023 Schedule D Part X uses conditional reserve language; this entry is not a payment receipt. Financial details: value: 5,259,802; currency: USD; kind: potential refund reserve; period: Year ended 2023-12-31 Amount basis: carrying value",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n43",
        "source": "cais",
        "target": "cais-reserve",
        "label": "$5,259,802 potential-refund reserve",
        "detail": "2023 Schedule D Part X uses conditional reserve language; this entry is not a payment receipt.",
        "date": "Year ended 2023-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-b1a700934b28"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,259,802; currency: USD; kind: potential refund reserve; period: Year ended 2023-12-31"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "carrying value"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n44",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "ftx-estate",
      "label": "$5.2m resolution reported by debtors",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-12-16 filing",
      "sources": [
        "src-f3950ad6f80e"
      ],
      "summary": "Court-filed disclosure lists CAIS among completed donation-recovery resolutions. This is a party's filed account; exact agreement, payment mechanics and reserve reconciliation remain missing. Financial details: value: 5,200,000; currency: USD; kind: party-reported settlement resolution; period: 2023-12-16 filing Amount basis: reported settlement",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n44",
        "source": "cais",
        "target": "ftx-estate",
        "label": "$5.2m resolution reported by debtors",
        "detail": "Court-filed disclosure lists CAIS among completed donation-recovery resolutions. This is a party's filed account; exact agreement, payment mechanics and reserve reconciliation remain missing.",
        "date": "2023-12-16 filing",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
            "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-f3950ad6f80e"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,200,000; currency: USD; kind: party-reported settlement resolution; period: 2023-12-16 filing"
          },
          {
            "label": "Amount basis",
            "text": "reported settlement"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "n45",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "cais-2024-close",
      "label": "Refund reserve no longer listed",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Year ended 2024-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "src-14c9e7f34568",
        "src-2615708ffd63"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 return carries $5,259,802 at opening. Closing other liabilities are $483,825, solely an operating lease liability in Schedule D. Cash settlement versus release/reclassification is unspecified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "n45",
        "source": "cais",
        "target": "cais-2024-close",
        "label": "Refund reserve no longer listed",
        "detail": "2024 return carries $5,259,802 at opening. Closing other liabilities are $483,825, solely an operating lease liability in Schedule D. Cash settlement versus release/reclassification is unspecified.",
        "date": "Year ended 2024-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
            "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-14c9e7f34568",
          "src-2615708ffd63"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i01",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
      "label": "operates",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-icmec-donors"
      ],
      "summary": "ICMEC identifies this financial coalition as a programme.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i01",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
        "label": "operates",
        "detail": "ICMEC identifies this financial coalition as a programme.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-icmec-donors"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i02",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
      "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-icmec-donors"
      ],
      "summary": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i02",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
        "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
        "detail": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-icmec-donors"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i03",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
      "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-icmec-donors"
      ],
      "summary": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i03",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
        "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
        "detail": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-icmec-donors"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i04",
      "source": "visa",
      "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
      "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-icmec-donors"
      ],
      "summary": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i04",
        "source": "visa",
        "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
        "label": "is listed as a programme donor to",
        "detail": "The supporter page supplies no amount, donation date or age-policy earmark.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC supporters",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-icmec-donors"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i05",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "ab1043",
      "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-22",
      "sources": [
        "s2-ab1043-analysis"
      ],
      "summary": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies sponsor of the then-current proposal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i05",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "ab1043",
        "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
        "detail": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies sponsor of the then-current proposal.",
        "date": "2025-04-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-ab1043-analysis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i06",
      "source": "children-now",
      "target": "ab1043",
      "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-22",
      "sources": [
        "s2-ab1043-analysis"
      ],
      "summary": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i06",
        "source": "children-now",
        "target": "ab1043",
        "label": "was named as a sponsor of",
        "detail": "Official April22,2025 analysis identifies this co-sponsor.",
        "date": "2025-04-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-ab1043-analysis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i07",
      "source": "bob-cunningham",
      "target": "icmec",
      "label": "was identified as policy-engagement director at",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-25",
      "sources": [
        "s2-wicks-drafting"
      ],
      "summary": "Wicks quotes Cunningham in this professional role.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i07",
        "source": "bob-cunningham",
        "target": "icmec",
        "label": "was identified as policy-engagement director at",
        "detail": "Wicks quotes Cunningham in this professional role.",
        "date": "2025-03-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wicks-drafting"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i08",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "wicks",
      "label": "reported collaborating on legislative drafting with",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-25",
      "sources": [
        "s2-wicks-drafting"
      ],
      "summary": "Cunningham publicly describes continuing drafting work with Wicks and her staff; contribution scope requires versions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i08",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "wicks",
        "label": "reported collaborating on legislative drafting with",
        "detail": "Cunningham publicly describes continuing drafting work with Wicks and her staff; contribution scope requires versions.",
        "date": "2025-03-25",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wicks-drafting"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i09",
      "source": "wicks",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "cited a 2021 report by",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-25",
      "sources": [
        "s2-wicks-drafting"
      ],
      "summary": "The announcement cites a report; citation does not establish drafting, payment or approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i09",
        "source": "wicks",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "cited a 2021 report by",
        "detail": "The announcement cites a report; citation does not establish drafting, payment or approval.",
        "date": "2025-03-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wicks-drafting"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i10",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "icmec-age-whitepaper",
      "label": "hosts the technical proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-age-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Official hosting is established; named writer and project funder are absent in the document.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i10",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "icmec-age-whitepaper",
        "label": "hosts the technical proposal",
        "detail": "Official hosting is established; named writer and project funder are absent in the document.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-age-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i11",
      "source": "icmec-age-whitepaper",
      "target": "api-admission-role",
      "label": "proposes OS review and approval of website API integrations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-age-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "The proposed process makes approval a prerequisite to receiving age data. This is a design proposal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i11",
        "source": "icmec-age-whitepaper",
        "target": "api-admission-role",
        "label": "proposes OS review and approval of website API integrations",
        "detail": "The proposed process makes approval a prerequisite to receiving age data. This is a design proposal.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-age-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i12",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "windows-age-signals",
      "label": "documents planned age-group and verification-status APIs",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-27 documentation; checked2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-windows"
      ],
      "summary": "August27 documentation says APIs are not enabled at runtime yet; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i12",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "windows-age-signals",
        "label": "documents planned age-group and verification-status APIs",
        "detail": "August27 documentation says APIs are not enabled at runtime yet; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks.",
        "date": "2026-08-27 documentation; checked2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-windows"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i13",
      "source": "windows-age-signals",
      "target": "microsoft-account",
      "label": "requires a signed-in user session with",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-windows"
      ],
      "summary": "The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i13",
        "source": "windows-age-signals",
        "target": "microsoft-account",
        "label": "requires a signed-in user session with",
        "detail": "The documented platform requires Microsoft-account context and registered application identity. This does not identify the proof method.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-windows"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i14",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "ab1043",
      "label": "publicly endorsed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-09",
      "sources": [
        "s2-wicks-support"
      ],
      "summary": "Dated announcement quotes Google; endorsement does not establish authorship of every provision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i14",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "ab1043",
        "label": "publicly endorsed",
        "detail": "Dated announcement quotes Google; endorsement does not establish authorship of every provision.",
        "date": "2025-09-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wicks-support"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i15",
      "source": "meta",
      "target": "ab1043",
      "label": "publicly endorsed OS and app-store age-assurance allocation in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-09",
      "sources": [
        "s2-wicks-support"
      ],
      "summary": "Meta is quoted favoring this allocation; common support is not proof of common contracts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i15",
        "source": "meta",
        "target": "ab1043",
        "label": "publicly endorsed OS and app-store age-assurance allocation in",
        "detail": "Meta is quoted favoring this allocation; common support is not proof of common contracts.",
        "date": "2025-09-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
            "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wicks-support"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i16",
      "source": "discord",
      "target": "discord-age-assurance",
      "label": "documents regional methods and limited tests for",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-discord-methods",
        "w7-impl-s-discord"
      ],
      "summary": "The August 10 help page distinguishes established routes and limited card/Wallet tests; no completed global rollout is established. UK-specific28 July 2026 documentation separately specifies feature restrictions and continued account access for non-verifiers; method assurances remain company claims.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i16",
        "source": "discord",
        "target": "discord-age-assurance",
        "label": "documents regional methods and limited tests for",
        "detail": "The August 10 help page distinguishes established routes and limited card/Wallet tests; no completed global rollout is established. UK-specific28 July 2026 documentation separately specifies feature restrictions and continued account access for non-verifiers; method assurances remain company claims.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-methods",
          "w7-impl-s-discord"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i17",
      "source": "discord-age-assurance",
      "target": "k-id",
      "label": "uses verification services from",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-discord-methods",
        "w7-impl-s-discord"
      ],
      "summary": "Company documentation names k-ID; the processing path differs by method. UK-specific July 2026 page also names k-ID; facial estimation described as on-device and ID route separate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i17",
        "source": "discord-age-assurance",
        "target": "k-id",
        "label": "uses verification services from",
        "detail": "Company documentation names k-ID; the processing path differs by method. UK-specific July 2026 page also names k-ID; facial estimation described as on-device and ID route separate.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-methods",
          "w7-impl-s-discord"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i18",
      "source": "k-id",
      "target": "veratad",
      "label": "names as an ID-authentication provider",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-discord-methods",
        "s2-kid-methods"
      ],
      "summary": "k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i18",
        "source": "k-id",
        "target": "veratad",
        "label": "names as an ID-authentication provider",
        "detail": "k-ID and Discord documentation name Veratad in the document-check path.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-methods",
          "s2-kid-methods"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i19",
      "source": "k-id",
      "target": "stripe",
      "label": "routes credit-card verification through",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-discord-methods",
        "s2-kid-methods"
      ],
      "summary": "The card route is a limited Discord test and an independently documented k-ID method; a refund does not establish deletion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i19",
        "source": "k-id",
        "target": "stripe",
        "label": "routes credit-card verification through",
        "detail": "The card route is a limited Discord test and an independently documented k-ID method; a refund does not establish deletion.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "k-ID verification methods",
            "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-methods",
          "s2-kid-methods"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i20",
      "source": "discord-age-assurance",
      "target": "google-wallet",
      "label": "tests receiving age-group and country signals from",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-discord-methods",
        "w7-impl-s-discord"
      ],
      "summary": "August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i20",
        "source": "discord-age-assurance",
        "target": "google-wallet",
        "label": "tests receiving age-group and country signals from",
        "detail": "August 10 documentation describes minimal attributes, not transfer of passport images to Discord. UK page28 July 2026 likewise describes Google Wallet as a test, not universal availability.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-methods",
          "w7-impl-s-discord"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i21",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "google-wallet",
      "label": "documents prior passport and face proofing for its ID-pass route",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "s2-wallet"
      ],
      "summary": "A minimal downstream signal can depend on earlier identity proof; these are separate disclosures.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i21",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "google-wallet",
        "label": "documents prior passport and face proofing for its ID-pass route",
        "detail": "A minimal downstream signal can depend on earlier identity proof; these are separate disclosures.",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
            "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wallet"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i22",
      "source": "discord",
      "target": "discord-age-appeals",
      "label": "reported possible exposure of government-ID photos in",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-03 statement;2025-10-09 update",
      "sources": [
        "s2-discord-incident"
      ],
      "summary": "Company reporting concerns historic support tickets for age appeals, a separate custody path from normal verification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i22",
        "source": "discord",
        "target": "discord-age-appeals",
        "label": "reported possible exposure of government-ID photos in",
        "detail": "Company reporting concerns historic support tickets for age appeals, a separate custody path from normal verification.",
        "date": "2025-10-03 statement;2025-10-09 update",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord support incident statement",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-incident"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i23",
      "source": "5ca",
      "target": "discord-age-appeals",
      "label": "disputed the incident attribution concerning",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-14 statement;2025-10-27 update",
      "sources": [
        "s2-5ca-response"
      ],
      "summary": "5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i23",
        "source": "5ca",
        "target": "discord-age-appeals",
        "label": "disputed the incident attribution concerning",
        "detail": "5CA describes employee-enabled access to the client ticketing system and disputes breach of its own systems. Preserve both accounts.",
        "date": "2025-10-14 statement;2025-10-27 update",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5CA incident response",
            "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-5ca-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i24",
      "source": "idscan",
      "target": "idscan-incident",
      "label": "acknowledged possible exposure of customer-account data in",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-04",
      "sources": [
        "s2-idscan-notice"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor notification does not confirm every advertised stolen-record count or customer as affected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i24",
        "source": "idscan",
        "target": "idscan-incident",
        "label": "acknowledged possible exposure of customer-account data in",
        "detail": "Vendor notification does not confirm every advertised stolen-record count or customer as affected.",
        "date": "2026-09-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-idscan-notice"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i25",
      "source": "idscan",
      "target": "veriscan",
      "label": "describes operating",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-05-23 case study",
      "sources": [
        "s2-idscan-casestudy"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor case study identifies VeriScan visitor-management services.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i25",
        "source": "idscan",
        "target": "veriscan",
        "label": "describes operating",
        "detail": "Vendor case study identifies VeriScan visitor-management services.",
        "date": "2022-05-23 case study",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-idscan-casestudy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i26",
      "source": "planet13",
      "target": "veriscan",
      "label": "was described as using",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-05-23 case study",
      "sources": [
        "s2-idscan-casestudy"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i26",
        "source": "planet13",
        "target": "veriscan",
        "label": "was described as using",
        "detail": "Historical vendor case study describes scanning and centralized visitor management.",
        "date": "2022-05-23 case study",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-idscan-casestudy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "i27",
      "source": "veriscan",
      "target": "dutchie",
      "label": "was described as passing parsed ID data and images into",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-05-23 case study",
      "sources": [
        "s2-idscan-casestudy"
      ],
      "summary": "A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "i27",
        "source": "veriscan",
        "target": "dutchie",
        "label": "was described as passing parsed ID data and images into",
        "detail": "A documented vendor account of a commercial data path; not evidence Dutchie was breached.",
        "date": "2022-05-23 case study",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
            "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-idscan-casestudy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-singapore",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "w1-icmec-icmec-singapore",
      "label": "sole member and funds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2024 consolidated perimeter",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Affiliate established May2009; Switzerland outside this consolidation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-singapore",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "w1-icmec-icmec-singapore",
        "label": "sole member and funds",
        "detail": "Affiliate established May2009; Switzerland outside this consolidation.",
        "date": "FY2024 consolidated perimeter",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-swissloan",
      "source": "w1-icmec-icmec-switzerland",
      "target": "icmec",
      "label": "provides loans",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2019–2021 loans disclosed FY2024",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Creditor identified in Note2; do not equate interested-person tax disclosure with lender identity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-swissloan",
        "source": "w1-icmec-icmec-switzerland",
        "target": "icmec",
        "label": "provides loans",
        "detail": "Creditor identified in Note2; do not equate interested-person tax disclosure with lender identity.",
        "date": "2019–2021 loans disclosed FY2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-interest-humer",
      "source": "w1-icmec-humer",
      "target": "w1-icmec-loans24",
      "label": "named interested person",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2024",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-990"
      ],
      "summary": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-interest-humer",
        "source": "w1-icmec-humer",
        "target": "w1-icmec-loans24",
        "label": "named interested person",
        "detail": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "date": "FY2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-990"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-interest-paul",
      "source": "w1-icmec-paul",
      "target": "w1-icmec-loans24",
      "label": "named interested person",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2024",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-990"
      ],
      "summary": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-interest-paul",
        "source": "w1-icmec-paul",
        "target": "w1-icmec-loans24",
        "label": "named interested person",
        "detail": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "date": "FY2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-990"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-interest-li",
      "source": "w1-icmec-li",
      "target": "w1-icmec-loans24",
      "label": "named interested person",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2024",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-990"
      ],
      "summary": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-interest-li",
        "source": "w1-icmec-li",
        "target": "w1-icmec-loans24",
        "label": "named interested person",
        "detail": "Board member; operating-funds purpose. Exact per-person loan allocation not resolved from extracted table.",
        "date": "FY2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-990"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-paypal",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
      "label": "grant enables",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical programme since2013; grant date undisclosed",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-apfc"
      ],
      "summary": "No amount or age-policy earmark disclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-paypal",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
        "label": "grant enables",
        "detail": "No amount or age-policy earmark disclosed.",
        "date": "Historical programme since2013; grant date undisclosed",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-apfc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-auswg",
      "source": "w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
      "target": "w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
      "label": "establishes working group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical, undated page",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-apfc"
      ],
      "summary": "Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-auswg",
        "source": "w1-icmec-apfc-roundtables",
        "target": "w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
        "label": "establishes working group",
        "detail": "Reported institutional follow-through from roundtable activity.",
        "date": "Historical, undated page",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-apfc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-aushome",
      "source": "w1-icmec-auspaynet",
      "target": "w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
      "label": "institutional home",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical, undated page",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-apfc"
      ],
      "summary": "Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-aushome",
        "source": "w1-icmec-auspaynet",
        "target": "w1-icmec-apfc-australia",
        "label": "institutional home",
        "detail": "Fraud in Banking Forum; not proof of current operating arrangement.",
        "date": "Historical, undated page",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-apfc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-hostmodel",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "w1-icmec-model",
      "label": "publishes hosted proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated; short title2025",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-model"
      ],
      "summary": "Individual drafter/funder not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-hostmodel",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "w1-icmec-model",
        "label": "publishes hosted proposal",
        "detail": "Individual drafter/funder not established.",
        "date": "Undated; short title2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-model"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope",
      "source": "wicks",
      "target": "ab1043",
      "label": "agrees scope narrowing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-15",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-sjud25"
      ],
      "summary": "Online service/product/feature removal followed stakeholder concerns; proposer names not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope",
        "source": "wicks",
        "target": "ab1043",
        "label": "agrees scope narrowing",
        "detail": "Online service/product/feature removal followed stakeholder concerns; proposer names not established.",
        "date": "2025-07-15",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-sjud25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-mpa",
      "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
      "target": "ab1856",
      "label": "requests design changes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "April6 version / April21 analysis2026",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-apcp26"
      ],
      "summary": "Family-account carveout and developer-requested blocking of minors; underlying memo not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-mpa",
        "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
        "target": "ab1856",
        "label": "requests design changes",
        "detail": "Family-account carveout and developer-requested blocking of minors; underlying memo not acquired.",
        "date": "April6 version / April21 analysis2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-apcp26"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative",
      "source": "wicks",
      "target": "ab1856",
      "label": "chooses alternative clarification",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-21",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-apcp26"
      ],
      "summary": "Generally applicable treatment of conflicting age evidence instead of family-account carveout.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative",
        "source": "wicks",
        "target": "ab1856",
        "label": "chooses alternative clarification",
        "detail": "Generally applicable treatment of conflicting age evidence instead of family-account carveout.",
        "date": "2026-04-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-apcp26"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-e-us-payable",
      "source": "controlaius",
      "target": "w1-controlai-unnamed-related-org",
      "label": "reports amount due to",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero",
      "sources": [
        "w1-controlai-s-us-return"
      ],
      "summary": "Counterparty and liability basis unresolved; no UK-US transfer edge earned. Financial details: value: 20,955; currency: USD; kind: year-end liability stock, not payment or annual funding flow; period: Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-e-us-payable",
        "source": "controlaius",
        "target": "w1-controlai-unnamed-related-org",
        "label": "reports amount due to",
        "detail": "Counterparty and liability basis unresolved; no UK-US transfer edge earned.",
        "date": "Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-controlai-s-us-return"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 20,955; currency: USD; kind: year-end liability stock, not payment or annual funding flow; period: Balance at 2025-12-31; beginning-of-period balance zero"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-e-miotti-us-officer",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "reported president treasurer and secretary",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-04 through 2025-12-31; return signed 2026-06-23",
      "sources": [
        "w1-controlai-s-us-return"
      ],
      "summary": "Reports 6 hours/week and zero compensation, benefits and allowances; named books custodian. Does not establish current exclusive authority or erase later officers.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-e-miotti-us-officer",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "reported president treasurer and secretary",
        "detail": "Reports 6 hours/week and zero compensation, benefits and allowances; named books custodian. Does not establish current exclusive authority or erase later officers.",
        "date": "2025-02-04 through 2025-12-31; return signed 2026-06-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-controlai-s-us-return"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority",
      "source": "w1-controlai-uk-board",
      "target": "sfr",
      "label": "formal management and budget authority",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Articles filed 2024-03-20; listed in current filing history 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "w1-controlai-s-uk-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Directors manage, can delegate and revoke, appoint directors, and are the sole legal members. Committee liabilities require board authority or an approved budget. No donor authority or exercise inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority",
        "source": "w1-controlai-uk-board",
        "target": "sfr",
        "label": "formal management and budget authority",
        "detail": "Directors manage, can delegate and revoke, appoint directors, and are the sole legal members. Committee liabilities require board authority or an approved budget. No donor authority or exercise inferred.",
        "date": "Articles filed 2024-03-20; listed in current filing history 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-controlai-s-uk-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection",
      "source": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
      "target": "steam",
      "label": "reportedly cited Rule 5.12.7 after rejecting Valve's response",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Valve statement August 1, 2025; upstream notice date not specified.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801"
      ],
      "summary": "Valve told the recipient journalist that its processors rejected a legal-content-only response and cited Mastercard's brand-risk rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection",
        "source": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
        "target": "steam",
        "label": "reportedly cited Rule 5.12.7 after rejecting Valve's response",
        "detail": "Valve told the recipient journalist that its processors rejected a legal-content-only response and cited Mastercard's brand-risk rule.",
        "date": "Valve statement August 1, 2025; upstream notice date not specified.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Update 23:36 BST: processors 'specifically cited Mastercard rule 5.12.7'.",
        "mechanism": "Operational payment eligibility and threat of payment-method loss.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-mastercard-relay-attribution",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
      "label": "reportedly communicated through processors and their acquiring banks",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Attribution published August 1, 2025; original message date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801"
      ],
      "summary": "Valve describes indirect Mastercard communications. Raw network instructions and counterparties are absent, so sender, scope and interpretation remain unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-mastercard-relay-attribution",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
        "label": "reportedly communicated through processors and their acquiring banks",
        "detail": "Valve describes indirect Mastercard communications. Raw network instructions and counterparties are absent, so sender, scope and interpretation remain unresolved.",
        "date": "Attribution published August 1, 2025; original message date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Valve's account: 'Mastercard did not communicate with Valve directly'.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice",
      "source": "steam",
      "target": "w1-payments-steam-retirements-202507",
      "label": "said it retired games to preserve payment methods",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retirements reported by Valve July 17, 2025; individual game decision dates not reconstructed.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250717"
      ],
      "summary": "Valve said it withdrew affected games and notified developers, offering app credits for future titles, to avoid losing methods used for other purchases.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice",
        "source": "steam",
        "target": "w1-payments-steam-retirements-202507",
        "label": "said it retired games to preserve payment methods",
        "detail": "Valve said it withdrew affected games and notified developers, offering app credits for future titles, to avoid losing methods used for other purchases.",
        "date": "Retirements reported by Valve July 17, 2025; individual game decision dates not reconstructed.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "July 17 recipient-published Valve press reply, paragraphs 1-3.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250717"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-review",
      "source": "itch-io",
      "target": "w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
      "label": "described selected account exclusions from collected payouts",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Public admin statement April 26, 2023; do not imply all current template wording existed then.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-itch-admin-20230426"
      ],
      "summary": "In April 2023, itch's admin said selected sellers had been told to leave collected payouts while distinguishing this from a global policy change.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-review",
        "source": "itch-io",
        "target": "w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
        "label": "described selected account exclusions from collected payouts",
        "detail": "In April 2023, itch's admin said selected sellers had been told to leave collected payouts while distinguishing this from a global policy change.",
        "date": "Public admin statement April 26, 2023; do not imply all current template wording existed then.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Pinned admin explanation dated April 26, 2023, linking the notice template.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
            "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-itch-admin-20230426"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-terms",
      "source": "itch-io",
      "target": "w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
      "label": "publishes disqualification and final-payout transition terms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current undated text inspected September 8, 2026; linked from April 2023 post, but intervening version history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-itch-payout-notice"
      ],
      "summary": "The current notice names risk/review costs and moves affected sellers away from collected payouts, with final-balance and payment-disablement conditions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-payout-terms",
        "source": "itch-io",
        "target": "w1-payments-itch-payout-eligibility",
        "label": "publishes disqualification and final-payout transition terms",
        "detail": "The current notice names risk/review costs and moves affected sellers away from collected payouts, with final-balance and payment-disablement conditions.",
        "date": "Current undated text inspected September 8, 2026; linked from April 2023 post, but intervening version history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Notice opening; FAQ on new payouts and 30-day migration window.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
            "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-itch-payout-notice"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-geoblocking",
      "source": "itch-io",
      "target": "w1-payments-itch-uk-restrictions-202507",
      "label": "announced tag-based geographic blocks with manual review and appeals",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Statement created July 27, 2025; describes July 25 regulatory onset; current post has five edits.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727"
      ],
      "summary": "Itch attributed UK page restrictions to OSA compliance, while preserving existing purchase downloads and offering a dashboard appeal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-geoblocking",
        "source": "itch-io",
        "target": "w1-payments-itch-uk-restrictions-202507",
        "label": "announced tag-based geographic blocks with manual review and appeals",
        "detail": "Itch attributed UK page restrictions to OSA compliance, while preserving existing purchase downloads and offering a dashboard appeal.",
        "date": "Statement created July 27, 2025; describes July 25 regulatory onset; current post has five edits.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "July 27 post lines 30, 32-36 and 47.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-id-proposal",
      "source": "itch-io",
      "target": "w1-payments-itch-digital-id-exploration",
      "label": "announced exploration of unnamed third-party digital-ID providers",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Proposal announced in July 27, 2025 post; current edited text and July 29 derivative excerpt.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727"
      ],
      "summary": "Documents the announcement of exploration. No provider selection, contract, deployment or link to the payment restriction was established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-edge-itch-id-proposal",
        "source": "itch-io",
        "target": "w1-payments-itch-digital-id-exploration",
        "label": "announced exploration of unnamed third-party digital-ID providers",
        "detail": "Documents the announcement of exploration. No provider selection, contract, deployment or link to the payment restriction was established.",
        "date": "Proposal announced in July 27, 2025 post; current edited text and July 29 derivative excerpt.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "July 27 post line 31: 'exploring partnerships with third-party “digital ID” providers'.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-fin-deficit",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "icmec-2024-accounts",
      "label": "reports a consolidated net-asset deficit of",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 2,293,789; currency: USD; kind: net-asset deficit; period: 2024-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-fin-deficit",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "icmec-2024-accounts",
        "label": "reports a consolidated net-asset deficit of",
        "detail": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established.",
        "date": "2024-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 2,293,789; currency: USD; kind: net-asset deficit; period: 2024-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-fin-restricted",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "icmec-2024-accounts",
      "label": "reports programme-restricted net assets of",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 817,886; currency: USD; kind: restricted net-asset stock; period: 2024-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-fin-restricted",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "icmec-2024-accounts",
        "label": "reports programme-restricted net assets of",
        "detail": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established.",
        "date": "2024-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 817,886; currency: USD; kind: restricted net-asset stock; period: 2024-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-fin-conditional",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "icmec-2024-accounts",
      "label": "reports unrecognized future conditional contributions of",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established. Financial details: value: 3,659,693; currency: USD; kind: unrecognized conditional future contribution agreements; period: 2024-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-fin-conditional",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "icmec-2024-accounts",
        "label": "reports unrecognized future conditional contributions of",
        "detail": "USD amount at December31,2024; no age-policy earmark or September2026 balance is established.",
        "date": "2024-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 3,659,693; currency: USD; kind: unrecognized conditional future contribution agreements; period: 2024-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-e-going-concern",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "icmec-financing-dependence",
      "label": "discloses substantial doubt and dependence on unrestricted fundraising",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2024 accounts issued2026-01-29",
      "sources": [
        "w1-icmec-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Note7 also records management plans and signed2026 grants/contracts; this is a dated going-concern disclosure, not proof of present insolvency.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-e-going-concern",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "icmec-financing-dependence",
        "label": "discloses substantial doubt and dependence on unrestricted fundraising",
        "detail": "Note7 also records management plans and signed2026 grants/contracts; this is a dated going-concern disclosure, not proof of present insolvency.",
        "date": "FY2024 accounts issued2026-01-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-icmec-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-lightcone25",
      "source": "lightcone",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "related party grant received",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2025",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation Financial details: value: 45,197,838; currency: USD; kind: grant receipt; period: FY2025 What remains unestablished: Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-lightcone25",
        "source": "lightcone",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "related party grant received",
        "detail": "Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation",
        "date": "FY2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 45,197,838; currency: USD; kind: grant receipt; period: FY2025"
          },
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-flf-receivable",
      "source": "flfoundation",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "year end amount due under cost sharing",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Year end amount due under cost sharing. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied. Financial details: value: 959,308; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-flf-receivable",
        "source": "flfoundation",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "year end amount due under cost sharing",
        "detail": "Year end amount due under cost sharing. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied.",
        "date": "2025-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 959,308; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-flf-payable",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "flfoundation",
      "label": "year end amount due for consulting costs",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Year end amount due for consulting costs. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied. Financial details: value: 430,343; currency: USD; kind: payable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-flf-payable",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "flfoundation",
        "label": "year end amount due for consulting costs",
        "detail": "Year end amount due for consulting costs. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied.",
        "date": "2025-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 430,343; currency: USD; kind: payable balance not payment; period: 2025-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-board-tallinn",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-board-tallinn",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
        "detail": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-board-aguirre",
      "source": "aguirre",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-board-aguirre",
        "source": "aguirre",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
        "detail": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-board-chita",
      "source": "chita",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-board-chita",
        "source": "chita",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
        "detail": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-board-fihn",
      "source": "w2-fli-fihn",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-board-fihn",
        "source": "w2-fli-fihn",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
        "detail": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-board-tegmark",
      "source": "tegmark",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers What remains unestablished: Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-board-tegmark",
        "source": "tegmark",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "foundation board member with joint signature by two",
        "detail": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21; not certified-current",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Signature rule does not establish appointment or grant-approval powers"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-echo",
      "source": "w2-fli-echo",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "appointed auditor",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Appointed auditor. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-echo",
        "source": "w2-fli-echo",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "appointed auditor",
        "detail": "Appointed auditor. See exact source locator; no broader authority implied.",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-supervision",
      "source": "w2-fli-supervisor",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "supervises foundation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-07-01",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-supervision"
      ],
      "summary": "No inference of government financing or policy direction What remains unestablished: No inference of government financing or policy direction",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-supervision",
        "source": "w2-fli-supervisor",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "supervises foundation",
        "detail": "No inference of government financing or policy direction",
        "date": "2022-07-01",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-supervision"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "No inference of government financing or policy direction"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-reservation",
      "source": "w2-fli-founder-role",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "reserved purpose modification right mentioned",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Founding notice2022-04-21",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-founding"
      ],
      "summary": "Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power What remains unestablished: Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-reservation",
        "source": "w2-fli-founder-role",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "reserved purpose modification right mentioned",
        "detail": "Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power",
        "date": "Founding notice2022-04-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-founding"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Article86a referenced; founder identity, conditions and current instrument unresolved; not unlimited unilateral power"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-e-supporting",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "flfoundation",
      "label": "amended purpose supports",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2022",
      "sources": [
        "src-e4e7930e8216"
      ],
      "summary": "Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree What remains unestablished: Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-e-supporting",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "flfoundation",
        "label": "amended purpose supports",
        "detail": "Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree",
        "date": "FY2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-e4e7930e8216"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "What remains unestablished",
            "text": "Purpose clause does not settle appointment rights or a simple parent/subsidiary tree"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-output-fli",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
      "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-mateus"
      ],
      "summary": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-output-fli",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
        "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
        "detail": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
        "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-mateus"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-output-frame",
      "source": "frame",
      "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
      "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-mateus"
      ],
      "summary": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-output-frame",
        "source": "frame",
        "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
        "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
        "detail": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
        "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-mateus"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-output-bluedot",
      "source": "w1-creator-bluedot",
      "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
      "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-mateus"
      ],
      "summary": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-output-bluedot",
        "source": "w1-creator-bluedot",
        "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
        "label": "creator acknowledges grant support for output",
        "detail": "Creator names this supporter and says funders had no editorial control. No agreement, payment date, value or disbursement proof. Do not call three independent confirmations: all edges derive from one creator statement.",
        "date": "Video published2026-05-08; description captured2026-09-08; grant dates not stated",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-mateus"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-frame-ltff",
      "source": "w1-creator-ltff",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "programme names as lead funder",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script"
      ],
      "summary": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-frame-ltff",
        "source": "w1-creator-ltff",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "programme names as lead funder",
        "detail": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
        "date": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-frame-aitof",
      "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "programme names as lead funder",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script"
      ],
      "summary": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-frame-aitof",
        "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "programme names as lead funder",
        "detail": "Frame also denies funder selection/editorial rights. No donor-side award, grant amount, period or condition verified.",
        "date": "Undated current FAQ captured2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-rational-partnership",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "rational",
      "label": "jointly acknowledged published video collaboration",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Output2May2025, partner announcement3May2025; descriptions captured8Sep2026",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-rational",
        "w1-creator-s-controlai-rational"
      ],
      "summary": "Specific output0bnxF9YfyFI names ControlAI and links its political-mobilization tools. Cash amount, script authority and actual contracting entity unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-rational-partnership",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "rational",
        "label": "jointly acknowledged published video collaboration",
        "detail": "Specific output0bnxF9YfyFI names ControlAI and links its political-mobilization tools. Cash amount, script authority and actual contracting entity unresolved.",
        "date": "Output2May2025, partner announcement3May2025; descriptions captured8Sep2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-rational",
          "w1-creator-s-controlai-rational"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-pf-terms",
      "source": "peoplefirst",
      "target": "w1-creator-peoplefirst-terms",
      "label": "publishes general creator contract terms",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current public version captured2026-09-08; historical applicability unknown",
      "sources": [
        "src-c33ab812f862",
        "src-65df3f2c31b3"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms name the corporation and offer approval, compliance and conditional payment rules. Campaign-specific SOW can override; no accepted SOW found.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-pf-terms",
        "source": "peoplefirst",
        "target": "w1-creator-peoplefirst-terms",
        "label": "publishes general creator contract terms",
        "detail": "Terms name the corporation and offer approval, compliance and conditional payment rules. Campaign-specific SOW can override; no accepted SOW found.",
        "date": "Current public version captured2026-09-08; historical applicability unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c33ab812f862",
          "src-65df3f2c31b3"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-e-pf-dots",
      "source": "peoplefirst",
      "target": "w1-creator-dots",
      "label": "terms name payout provider",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current version2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "src-c33ab812f862"
      ],
      "summary": "General platform mechanism only. No proof Dots processed a Protect What Is Human payment; no connection earned to the unidentified bank in the separate games-payment lane.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-e-pf-dots",
        "source": "peoplefirst",
        "target": "w1-creator-dots",
        "label": "terms name payout provider",
        "detail": "General platform mechanism only. No proof Dots processed a Protect What Is Human payment; no connection earned to the unidentified bank in the separate games-payment lane.",
        "date": "Current version2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-c33ab812f862"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
      "source": "trial-board",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "recorded objections on sampling, safeguarding and circumvention",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Cover March13; meeting-header February date conflicts with DIGI's March14 reference. Exact event day unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-march-minutes"
      ],
      "summary": "March minutes preserve substantive challenge and assigned follow-up actions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
        "source": "trial-board",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "recorded objections on sampling, safeguarding and circumvention",
        "detail": "March minutes preserve substantive challenge and assigned follow-up actions.",
        "date": "Cover March13; meeting-header February date conflicts with DIGI's March14 reference. Exact event day unresolved.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF pp5-10; safeguarding policy circulation and Amanda Third follow-up pp6-7.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-march-minutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-scout-recruitment",
      "source": "w1-australia-scout-insights",
      "target": "au-age-trial",
      "label": "said mystery shoppers would come from its registered panel",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Statement April29,2025, before reported fieldwork commencement.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-april-minutes"
      ],
      "summary": "April29 clarification excludes employees/their children. It does not establish whether the plan changed or earlier description was wrong. Later April minutes state Scout would use its registered panel, not employees/their children; March–July minutes record responses. This remains an attributed objection, not the established achieved sample.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-scout-recruitment",
        "source": "w1-australia-scout-insights",
        "target": "au-age-trial",
        "label": "said mystery shoppers would come from its registered panel",
        "detail": "April29 clarification excludes employees/their children. It does not establish whether the plan changed or earlier description was wrong. Later April minutes state Scout would use its registered panel, not employees/their children; March–July minutes record responses. This remains an attributed objection, not the established achieved sample.",
        "date": "Statement April29,2025, before reported fieldwork commencement.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF p9, Mystery Shopping Update.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-april-minutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-mou-signed",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w1-australia-esafety-mou",
      "label": "reportedly signed trial impartiality boundary agreement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported signed by April29,2025; precise execution date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-april-minutes",
        "w1-australia-src-final-responses"
      ],
      "summary": "Instrument existence reported; terms, approval rights and execution date remain unavailable.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-mou-signed",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w1-australia-esafety-mou",
        "label": "reportedly signed trial impartiality boundary agreement",
        "detail": "Instrument existence reported; terms, approval rights and execution date remain unavailable.",
        "date": "Reported signed by April29,2025; precise execution date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "April PDF p3; final B.18.2, PDF p74.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-april-minutes",
          "w1-australia-src-final-responses"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-regulator-draft-input",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
      "label": "reportedly provided preliminary-report feedback under the MOU",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Draft Preliminary Report stage; feedback timing not established as July final-report review",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-final-responses"
      ],
      "summary": "Final report identifies regulator input; accepted changes and underlying comments are unrecovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-regulator-draft-input",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
        "label": "reportedly provided preliminary-report feedback under the MOU",
        "detail": "Final report identifies regulator input; accepted changes and underlying comments are unrecovered.",
        "date": "Draft Preliminary Report stage; feedback timing not established as July final-report review",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "B.18.4, PDF p74 / printed70.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-final-responses"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-corby-review-commitment",
      "source": "corby",
      "target": "w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
      "label": "committed to reviewing Parts B–J for consistency",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Commitment recorded July8,2025; not evidence of completed review.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-july-minutes",
        "src-a61d78086a00"
      ],
      "summary": "Minutes record intended technical/vendor-section review. Completion and conflict-specific limits were not established. The conflict register restricts his role to stakeholder engagement as well as excluding system testing and euCONSENT submission. The operative scope and actual work need the exclusion decision and signoffs; breach is not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-corby-review-commitment",
        "source": "corby",
        "target": "w1-australia-trial-draft-review",
        "label": "committed to reviewing Parts B–J for consistency",
        "detail": "Minutes record intended technical/vendor-section review. Completion and conflict-specific limits were not established. The conflict register restricts his role to stakeholder engagement as well as excluding system testing and euCONSENT submission. The operative scope and actual work need the exclusion decision and signoffs; breach is not established.",
        "date": "Commitment recorded July8,2025; not evidence of completed review.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "July PDF p7.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-july-minutes",
          "src-a61d78086a00"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access",
      "source": "au-age-trial",
      "target": "trial-board",
      "label": "reported withholding detailed vendor sections during legal review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Access described July8,2025; vendor responses requested by July18.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-july-minutes"
      ],
      "summary": "SAB had A/B/K while vendors had their own extracts; identified review windows need draft/redline reconciliation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access",
        "source": "au-age-trial",
        "target": "trial-board",
        "label": "reported withholding detailed vendor sections during legal review",
        "detail": "SAB had A/B/K while vendors had their own extracts; identified review windows need draft/redline reconciliation.",
        "date": "Access described July8,2025; vendor responses requested by July18.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "July PDF pp3,6-8.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-july-minutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-edge-responses-reported",
      "source": "au-age-trial",
      "target": "w1-australia-protocol-revisions",
      "label": "reported amending methodology in response to stakeholder concerns",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective final-report account,2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w1-australia-src-final-responses"
      ],
      "summary": "Final table reports revisions and limits; it does not supply the before/after approved versions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-edge-responses-reported",
        "source": "au-age-trial",
        "target": "w1-australia-protocol-revisions",
        "label": "reported amending methodology in response to stakeholder concerns",
        "detail": "Final table reports revisions and limits; it does not supply the before/after approved versions.",
        "date": "Retrospective final-report account,2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "B.17.5, PDF pp66-68 / printed62-64.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-australia-src-final-responses"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-due-baif",
      "source": "baif",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement. Financial details: value: 163,034; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-due-baif",
        "source": "baif",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
        "detail": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement.",
        "date": "2025-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 163,034; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-due-fli-action-research",
      "source": "fli-action-research",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-12-31",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement. Financial details: value: 2,883; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-due-fli-action-research",
        "source": "fli-action-research",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "owed year-end payroll and other cost reimbursements",
        "detail": "FLI paid costs on this related organisation's behalf under cost-sharing agreements. Balance owed at year end, not a cash disbursement.",
        "date": "2025-12-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 2,883; currency: USD; kind: receivable balance under cost-sharing agreement; period: 2025-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-flieurope",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "flieurope",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-flieurope",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "flieurope",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-flfoundation",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "flfoundation",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-flfoundation",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "flfoundation",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-asia",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "fli-asia",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-asia",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "fli-asia",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-lightcone",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "lightcone",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-lightcone",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "lightcone",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-action-research",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "fli-action-research",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-fli-action-research",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "fli-action-research",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-wise-ancestors",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "wise-ancestors",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-wise-ancestors",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "wise-ancestors",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-windfall-trust",
      "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
      "target": "windfall-trust",
      "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w2-fli-s-audit25"
      ],
      "summary": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-ed-board-windfall-trust",
        "source": "fli-ed-audit-role",
        "target": "windfall-trust",
        "label": "audit reports overlapping board service",
        "detail": "Note6 refers to the Institute's current Executive Director without naming the person. This is shared board service, not an inferred appointment right or command.",
        "date": "2025 audit issued 16 June 2026; appointment interval unspecified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w2-fli-s-audit25"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-creator-published-output",
      "source": "mateus",
      "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
      "label": "published the grant-acknowledging video",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published 2026-05-08; description captured 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "w1-creator-s-mateus"
      ],
      "summary": "Future Tense publication dated 8 May 2026. Current description identifies three grant supporters and denies editorial control; description history and payment instruments not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-creator-published-output",
        "source": "mateus",
        "target": "w1-creator-futuretense-output",
        "label": "published the grant-acknowledging video",
        "detail": "Future Tense publication dated 8 May 2026. Current description identifies three grant supporters and denies editorial control; description history and payment instruments not obtained.",
        "date": "Published 2026-05-08; description captured 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-creator-s-mateus"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-kidron-portantino",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "w3-5r-portantino",
      "label": "asked to retain under-18 coverage; reported amendment work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-08-03",
      "sources": [
        "w3-5r-s-material-20"
      ],
      "summary": "Her own account of work with her team and bill authors after feedback; no authority to direct legislator or funding-source inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-kidron-portantino",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "w3-5r-portantino",
        "label": "asked to retain under-18 coverage; reported amendment work",
        "detail": "Her own account of work with her team and bill authors after feedback; no authority to direct legislator or funding-source inference.",
        "date": "2022-08-03",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-5r-s-material-20"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-kidron-stern",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "w3-5r-stern",
      "label": "sought support against lower age cutoffs",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-08-03",
      "sources": [
        "w3-5r-s-material-26"
      ],
      "summary": "Letter reports industry pressure for under13/under16 and seeks under18. Specific industry proponents unidentified; exact legislative effect not attributed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-kidron-stern",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "w3-5r-stern",
        "label": "sought support against lower age cutoffs",
        "detail": "Letter reports industry pressure for under13/under16 and seeks under18. Specific industry proponents unidentified; exact legislative effect not attributed.",
        "date": "2022-08-03",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-5r-s-material-26"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-background-drafts",
      "source": "capitol-connection",
      "target": "w3-5r-mckinley",
      "label": "reported sending committee-background drafts",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-06-09/10",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae"
      ],
      "summary": "PDFp14. Actual draft attachments and approval replies not acquired. Recipient is staff; do not collapse into proof Wicks personally reviewed the draft.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-background-drafts",
        "source": "capitol-connection",
        "target": "w3-5r-mckinley",
        "label": "reported sending committee-background drafts",
        "detail": "PDFp14. Actual draft attachments and approval replies not acquired. Recipient is staff; do not collapse into proof Wicks personally reviewed the draft.",
        "date": "2022-06-09/10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-proposed-amendments",
      "source": "capitol-connection",
      "target": "w3-5r-skaggs",
      "label": "reported sending proposed author amendments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-08-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae"
      ],
      "summary": "PDFp18. Attachment missing; originator, exact changes and acceptance unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-proposed-amendments",
        "source": "capitol-connection",
        "target": "w3-5r-skaggs",
        "label": "reported sending proposed author amendments",
        "detail": "PDFp18. Attachment missing; originator, exact changes and acceptance unresolved.",
        "date": "2022-08-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-comparison-chart",
      "source": "capitol-connection",
      "target": "w3-5r-dang",
      "label": "reported sending UK/California comparison chart",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-08-05",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae",
        "w3-5r-s-material-21"
      ],
      "summary": "Logp18 and filed chart are a document-family match, not a verified byte-identical attachment match. Chart advocates cross-jurisdiction alignment; it does not confer UK legal authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-comparison-chart",
        "source": "capitol-connection",
        "target": "w3-5r-dang",
        "label": "reported sending UK/California comparison chart",
        "detail": "Logp18 and filed chart are a document-family match, not a verified byte-identical attachment match. Chart advocates cross-jurisdiction alignment; it does not confer UK legal authority.",
        "date": "2022-08-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae",
          "w3-5r-s-material-21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-governor-amendments",
      "source": "capitol-connection",
      "target": "w3-5r-aurre",
      "label": "reported sharing amendment summaries and opposition-response updates",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-08-10/15/23",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae"
      ],
      "summary": "PDFpp18–19. Records access and activity; no approval instruction or governor decision receipt.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-governor-amendments",
        "source": "capitol-connection",
        "target": "w3-5r-aurre",
        "label": "reported sharing amendment summaries and opposition-response updates",
        "detail": "PDFpp18–19. Records access and activity; no approval instruction or governor decision receipt.",
        "date": "2022-08-10/15/23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-coalition-submission",
      "source": "capitol-connection",
      "target": "w3-5r-judiciary",
      "label": "reported submitting coalition support letter",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-06-21",
      "sources": [
        "src-55256b9868ae",
        "w3-5r-s-material-19"
      ],
      "summary": "PDFp15 and filed June10 letter. Strong document-family match; exact email attachment/headers absent. Filing/dissemination does not establish authorship.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-coalition-submission",
        "source": "capitol-connection",
        "target": "w3-5r-judiciary",
        "label": "reported submitting coalition support letter",
        "detail": "PDFp15 and filed June10 letter. Strong document-family match; exact email attachment/headers absent. Filing/dissemination does not establish authorship.",
        "date": "2022-06-21",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae",
          "w3-5r-s-material-19"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-e-prose-uptake",
      "source": "w3-5r-coalition-letter",
      "target": "w3-5r-concurrence-analysis",
      "label": "distinctive passages reproduced as arguments in support",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-06-10 letter;2022-08-30 analysis",
      "sources": [
        "w3-5r-s-material-19",
        "w3-5r-s-analysis-356279"
      ],
      "summary": "Letterp1 and analysisp4. Four matching normalized blocks of59/47/40/34words; receipt5rights-text-comparison.json. Uptake as attributed advocacy, not endorsement or independent verification of statistics; intermediary text reuse possible.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-e-prose-uptake",
        "source": "w3-5r-coalition-letter",
        "target": "w3-5r-concurrence-analysis",
        "label": "distinctive passages reproduced as arguments in support",
        "detail": "Letterp1 and analysisp4. Four matching normalized blocks of59/47/40/34words; receipt5rights-text-comparison.json. Uptake as attributed advocacy, not endorsement or independent verification of statistics; intermediary text reuse possible.",
        "date": "2022-06-10 letter;2022-08-30 analysis",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-5r-s-material-19",
          "w3-5r-s-analysis-356279"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-senior-decision",
      "source": "w3-oak-senior-decision",
      "target": "oak",
      "label": "receive recommendations and approve or decline grants",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated process guide currently linked8 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-grant-process"
      ],
      "summary": "Generic Oak process; named decisionmakers for 5 Rights/WeProtect were not recovered. Applicant and Oak sign a grant letter before the transfer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-senior-decision",
        "source": "w3-oak-senior-decision",
        "target": "oak",
        "label": "receive recommendations and approve or decline grants",
        "detail": "Generic Oak process; named decisionmakers for 5 Rights/WeProtect were not recovered. Applicant and Oak sign a grant letter before the transfer.",
        "date": "Undated process guide currently linked8 September 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-grant-process"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-nl-uk-control",
      "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
      "label": "reports full control of its UK company",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 accounts",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Accounts p17 explicitly states full control; p10 includes the UK entity in consolidation. Does not make the umbrella membership a controlled subsidiary.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-nl-uk-control",
        "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
        "label": "reports full control of its UK company",
        "detail": "Accounts p17 explicitly states full control; p10 includes the UK entity in consolidation. Does not make the umbrella membership a controlled subsidiary.",
        "date": "2023 accounts",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-budget-permission",
      "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
      "label": "requires prior written approval for spending outside annual budget",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Disclosure of 2021 subgrant terms; yearly UK budget submitted to the Stichting. Executed agreement and actual exception decisions not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-budget-permission",
        "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
        "label": "requires prior written approval for spending outside annual budget",
        "detail": "Disclosure of 2021 subgrant terms; yearly UK budget submitted to the Stichting. Executed agreement and actual exception decisions not obtained.",
        "date": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-underspend",
      "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
      "label": "may deduct underspend from a later annual grant",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Discretionary adjustment disclosed at p15, not a proved sanction or repayment event.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-underspend",
        "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
        "label": "may deduct underspend from a later annual grant",
        "detail": "Discretionary adjustment disclosed at p15, not a proved sanction or repayment event.",
        "date": "Agreement 2021 disclosed in 2023 accounts",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-subgrant2023",
      "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
      "label": "reports 2023 subgrant contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Financial year 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Standalone resources-expended note p21; internal flow eliminated in group consolidation. Do not add it to external donor income as new group resources. Financial details: value: 1,520,482; currency: EUR; kind: reported subgrant expenditure; period: 2023",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-subgrant2023",
        "source": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-uk",
        "label": "reports 2023 subgrant contribution",
        "detail": "Standalone resources-expended note p21; internal flow eliminated in group consolidation. Do not add it to external donor income as new group resources.",
        "date": "Financial year 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,520,482; currency: EUR; kind: reported subgrant expenditure; period: 2023"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-oak-income2023",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "label": "names Oak in consolidated recognised grant income",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Financial year 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "p16 income under accrual policy at p12. Not proof of a same-year wire or the later 2025 award; restricted project balance is a different measure. Financial details: value: 553,829; currency: EUR; kind: recognised grant income; period: 2023 consolidated group",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-oak-income2023",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "label": "names Oak in consolidated recognised grant income",
        "detail": "p16 income under accrual policy at p12. Not proof of a same-year wire or the later 2025 award; restricted project balance is a different measure.",
        "date": "Financial year 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 553,829; currency: EUR; kind: recognised grant income; period: 2023 consolidated group"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-tfg-amendment",
      "source": "w3-oak-together",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "label": "reports amended Safe Futures commitment via Together for Girls",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 agreement amended after31 December 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "p17: original$ 400,000 over4 years reduced to$ 100,000 when years2–4 moved to the directly named donor. Do not retain400,000 as an additional live commitment. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: amended commitment; period: original2023 grant; subsequent amendment date unspecified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-tfg-amendment",
        "source": "w3-oak-together",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "label": "reports amended Safe Futures commitment via Together for Girls",
        "detail": "p17: original$ 400,000 over4 years reduced to$ 100,000 when years2–4 moved to the directly named donor. Do not retain400,000 as an additional live commitment.",
        "date": "2023 agreement amended after31 December 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: amended commitment; period: original2023 grant; subsequent amendment date unspecified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-swiss-grant",
      "source": "w3-oak-swiss-philanthropy",
      "target": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
      "label": "reports new Safe Futures grant agreement",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "1 March 2024–28 February 2027",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
      ],
      "summary": "p17: $ 430,000 comprises the rerouted$ 300,000 plus$ 130,000 additional support. Exact legal donor/fund and payment proof missing; no Oak-to-this-instrument edge earned. Financial details: value: 430,000; currency: USD; kind: grant commitment including rerouted instalments; period: 2024-03-01 to2027-02-28",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-swiss-grant",
        "source": "w3-oak-swiss-philanthropy",
        "target": "w3-oak-wp-nl",
        "label": "reports new Safe Futures grant agreement",
        "detail": "p17: $ 430,000 comprises the rerouted$ 300,000 plus$ 130,000 additional support. Exact legal donor/fund and payment proof missing; no Oak-to-this-instrument edge earned.",
        "date": "1 March 2024–28 February 2027",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 430,000; currency: USD; kind: grant commitment including rerouted instalments; period: 2024-03-01 to2027-02-28"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-budget-approved",
      "source": "w3-oak-policy-board",
      "target": "weprotect",
      "label": "approved 2024 budget",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "12–13 December 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-minutes-dec2023"
      ],
      "summary": "December 2023 public minute records actual board approval; separate from the undisclosed line-item budget or manuscript signoffs.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-budget-approved",
        "source": "w3-oak-policy-board",
        "target": "weprotect",
        "label": "approved 2024 budget",
        "detail": "December 2023 public minute records actual board approval; separate from the undisclosed line-item budget or manuscript signoffs.",
        "date": "12–13 December 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-minutes-dec2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-oak-hub",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "label": "acknowledges support for the joint initiative",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 launch; current hub page captured8 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-about",
        "w3-oak-wp-review2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Hub and WeProtect publications name Oak support. Amount, grant recipient and routing for each programme instrument must remain distinct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-oak-hub",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "label": "acknowledges support for the joint initiative",
        "detail": "Hub and WeProtect publications name Oak support. Amount, grant recipient and routing for each programme instrument must remain distinct.",
        "date": "2023 launch; current hub page captured8 September 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-about",
          "w3-oak-wp-review2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-hub-wp",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-hub-wp",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
        "detail": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
        "date": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-hub-svri",
      "source": "w3-oak-svri",
      "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-hub-svri",
        "source": "w3-oak-svri",
        "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
        "detail": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
        "date": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-hub-tfg",
      "source": "w3-oak-together",
      "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-hub-tfg",
        "source": "w3-oak-together",
        "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "label": "co-leads joint initiative",
        "detail": "Named co-lead, not automatic unilateral control or legal incorporation of the Hub.",
        "date": "Current page captured8 September 2026; initiative documented 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-duch-role",
      "source": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
      "target": "oak",
      "label": "heads Solutions sub-programme within Prevent Child Sexual Abuse",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Captured8 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-team"
      ],
      "summary": "Current official professional role; no named award approval inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-duch-role",
        "source": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
        "target": "oak",
        "label": "heads Solutions sub-programme within Prevent Child Sexual Abuse",
        "detail": "Current official professional role; no named award approval inferred.",
        "date": "Captured8 September 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-team"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-duch-adviser",
      "source": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
      "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "label": "listed on advisory group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Captured8 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Current advisory membership; the separate 2024 credit is evidence of input into that particular output.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-duch-adviser",
        "source": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
        "target": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "label": "listed on advisory group",
        "detail": "Current advisory membership; the separate 2024 credit is evidence of input into that particular output.",
        "date": "Captured8 September 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
            "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-review-commission",
      "source": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "target": "w3-oak-evidence-review",
      "label": "commissioned evidence review with Oak support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published22 October 2024; current PDF captured8 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute"
      ],
      "summary": "p105 names lead authors Hannah Thompson,Bridget Steffen,TimothyP.Williams; WeProtect staff feature in leadership/core credits. Contract value and final approval rights unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-review-commission",
        "source": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "target": "w3-oak-evidence-review",
        "label": "commissioned evidence review with Oak support",
        "detail": "p105 names lead authors Hannah Thompson,Bridget Steffen,TimothyP.Williams; WeProtect staff feature in leadership/core credits. Contract value and final approval rights unknown.",
        "date": "Published22 October 2024; current PDF captured8 September 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-duch-input",
      "source": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
      "target": "w3-oak-evidence-review",
      "label": "credited for input shaping the review",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024 review",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute"
      ],
      "summary": "p105 names Duch among advisers/key informants whose input shaped the work. p104 describes draft review; individual comments, edits and veto rights are not supplied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-duch-input",
        "source": "w3-oak-helena-duch",
        "target": "w3-oak-evidence-review",
        "label": "credited for input shaping the review",
        "detail": "p105 names Duch among advisers/key informants whose input shaped the work. p104 describes draft review; individual comments, edits and veto rights are not supplied.",
        "date": "2024 review",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-guidance",
      "source": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
      "target": "w3-oak-guidance",
      "label": "developed Oak-supported guidance through consultation and draft review",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 publication; developmentJan 2024–Jul 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-safe-futures-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "pp3,9,79–80 credit authorArtiMohan, leadership, WeProtect core members and three named advisory reviewers. Helena Duch is not one of the three credited direct advisory reviewers for this output.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-guidance",
        "source": "w3-oak-safe-futures",
        "target": "w3-oak-guidance",
        "label": "developed Oak-supported guidance through consultation and draft review",
        "detail": "pp3,9,79–80 credit authorArtiMohan, leadership, WeProtect core members and three named advisory reviewers. Helena Duch is not one of the three credited direct advisory reviewers for this output.",
        "date": "2025 publication; developmentJan 2024–Jul 2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
            "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-survey-commission",
      "source": "weprotect",
      "target": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
      "label": "commissioned research for EU-legislation advocacy",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "PublishedJune 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
        "w3-oak-wp-review2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Accounts p6 explicitly links the research to its legislative case; review p7 describes commissioning and subsequent policymaker engagement. Provider contract and manuscript approval record not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-survey-commission",
        "source": "weprotect",
        "target": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
        "label": "commissioned research for EU-legislation advocacy",
        "detail": "Accounts p6 explicitly links the research to its legislative case; review p7 describes commissioning and subsequent policymaker engagement. Provider contract and manuscript approval record not obtained.",
        "date": "PublishedJune 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
          "w3-oak-wp-review2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-survey-provider",
      "source": "w3-oak-economist",
      "target": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
      "label": "conducted retrospective survey",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February–March 2023 fieldwork",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-european-survey"
      ],
      "summary": "Report pp3,7–8: questionnaire fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; study population and filtering limits recorded. Acknowledged experts are not necessarily endorsers (p20).",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-survey-provider",
        "source": "w3-oak-economist",
        "target": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
        "label": "conducted retrospective survey",
        "detail": "Report pp3,7–8: questionnaire fieldedFeb–Mar 2023; study population and filtering limits recorded. Acknowledged experts are not necessarily endorsers (p20).",
        "date": "February–March 2023 fieldwork",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-european-survey"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-e-eu-deployment",
      "source": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
      "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
      "label": "used by WeProtect to support legislative advocacy",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June 2023 onward",
      "sources": [
        "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
        "w3-oak-wp-review2023"
      ],
      "summary": "WeProtect accounts p6 reports targeted government engagement and ECLAG-letter work after publication. No causal proof of changed law or Oak earmarking for this survey.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-e-eu-deployment",
        "source": "w3-oak-eu-survey",
        "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
        "label": "used by WeProtect to support legislative advocacy",
        "detail": "WeProtect accounts p6 reports targeted government engagement and ECLAG-letter work after publication. No causal proof of changed law or Oak earmarking for this survey.",
        "date": "June 2023 onward",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
          "w3-oak-wp-review2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig",
      "source": "ltf",
      "target": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
      "label": "reported committee contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15",
      "sources": [
        "src-6460d3b558f5"
      ],
      "summary": "LTF Schedule B line23 p13 reports $5m to Think Big, transaction SB23.I31388. This is part of e147 $40m aggregate, not additional outside money or a Build American AI transfer. No earmark to a specific ad or ultimate donor established. Financial details: value: 5,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported committee contribution, subset of e147; period: 2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig",
        "source": "ltf",
        "target": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
        "label": "reported committee contribution",
        "detail": "LTF Schedule B line23 p13 reports $5m to Think Big, transaction SB23.I31388. This is part of e147 $40m aggregate, not additional outside money or a Build American AI transfer. No earmark to a specific ad or ultimate donor established.",
        "date": "2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-6460d3b558f5"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported committee contribution, subset of e147; period: 2026-02-24; Q1 return filed 2026-04-15"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-bores",
      "source": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
      "target": "w3-opp-lantern",
      "label": "reported independent expenditures opposing Bores",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20",
      "sources": [
        "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
      ],
      "summary": "Seven Schedule E rows total $787,404.29, each marked oppose Bores in the NY-12 2026 primary. The form date field is disbursement or obligation; filed expenditures and stated dissemination are established, not independent bank settlement or proof of each placement. Excludes the $277,827.78 Jackson support entry. Financial details: value: 787,404.29; currency: USD; kind: reported independent expenditure, not bank-settlement proof; period: March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-bores",
        "source": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
        "target": "w3-opp-lantern",
        "label": "reported independent expenditures opposing Bores",
        "detail": "Seven Schedule E rows total $787,404.29, each marked oppose Bores in the NY-12 2026 primary. The form date field is disbursement or obligation; filed expenditures and stated dissemination are established, not independent bank settlement or proof of each placement. Excludes the $277,827.78 Jackson support entry.",
        "date": "March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 787,404.29; currency: USD; kind: reported independent expenditure, not bank-settlement proof; period: March 2026 period; amendment filed 2026-05-20"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-operations",
      "source": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
      "target": "w3-opp-lantern",
      "label": "reported operating disbursements",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment",
      "sources": [
        "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
      ],
      "summary": "Nine Schedule B line21b entries for polling, research, management/strategy consulting and media production. Candidate fields blank; some rows retain Other2025 labels. These are distinct operating rows that can be combined with Schedule E for a scoped total, but cannot all be attributed to Bores, labelled creator fees or added again to a total already containing them. Financial details: value: 215,037; currency: USD; kind: reported operating disbursements; period: 2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-e-thinkbig-lantern-operations",
        "source": "w3-opp-thinkbig",
        "target": "w3-opp-lantern",
        "label": "reported operating disbursements",
        "detail": "Nine Schedule B line21b entries for polling, research, management/strategy consulting and media production. Candidate fields blank; some rows retain Other2025 labels. These are distinct operating rows that can be combined with Schedule E for a scoped total, but cannot all be attributed to Bores, labelled creator fees or added again to a total already containing them.",
        "date": "2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 215,037; currency: USD; kind: reported operating disbursements; period: 2026-03-03 to 2026-03-31; May20 amendment"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-e-lantern-operation",
      "source": "w3-opp-lantern",
      "target": "w3-opp-march-operation",
      "label": "named vendor for reported production and distribution",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Date scope stated in source",
      "sources": [
        "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
      ],
      "summary": "The filing identifies Lantern as payee for the seven Bores rows. The descriptions do not identify the actual production staff, publisher, texting platform or subcontractors. This contextual edge carries no additional money.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-e-lantern-operation",
        "source": "w3-opp-lantern",
        "target": "w3-opp-march-operation",
        "label": "named vendor for reported production and distribution",
        "detail": "The filing identifies Lantern as payee for the seven Bores rows. The descriptions do not identify the actual production staff, publisher, texting platform or subcontractors. This contextual edge carries no additional money.",
        "date": "Date scope stated in source",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-e-operation-bores",
      "source": "w3-opp-march-operation",
      "target": "w3-opp-bores",
      "label": "opposed federal primary candidacy",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Date scope stated in source",
      "sources": [
        "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
      ],
      "summary": "All seven selected March Schedule E rows mark opposition, House NY-12, primary 2026. This is the expenditure purpose; it does not establish election effect or causation of any legislation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-e-operation-bores",
        "source": "w3-opp-march-operation",
        "target": "w3-opp-bores",
        "label": "opposed federal primary candidacy",
        "detail": "All seven selected March Schedule E rows mark opposition, House NY-12, primary 2026. This is the expenditure purpose; it does not establish election effect or causation of any legislation.",
        "date": "Date scope stated in source",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-opp-s-march-amended"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-affiliate",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "icmec",
      "label": "was established as an affiliate of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2020 legal creation; late2021 operational-establishment account; US sole-membership/control ceased6July2023",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-about",
        "w4-fin-s-fs2022",
        "w4-fin-s-fs2023",
        "w4-fin-s-abn"
      ],
      "summary": "Australian legal company createdNovember2020; operational origins described as late2021. US2023 audit says US was no longer sole member and no longer controlled Australia from6July2023. Current AU self-description says independent; not evidence US withdrew from all membership.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-affiliate",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "icmec",
        "label": "was established as an affiliate of",
        "detail": "Australian legal company createdNovember2020; operational origins described as late2021. US2023 audit says US was no longer sole member and no longer controlled Australia from6July2023. Current AU self-description says independent; not evidence US withdrew from all membership.",
        "date": "November2020 legal creation; late2021 operational-establishment account; US sole-membership/control ceased6July2023",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-about",
          "w4-fin-s-fs2022",
          "w4-fin-s-fs2023",
          "w4-fin-s-abn"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-grant",
      "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "committed funding for data sharing",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY21 original award description; FY24 extension reported; source terms not fully reconciled",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-westpac2024",
        "w4-fin-s-westpac2021",
        "w4-fin-s-westpac2024",
        "w4-fin-s-programme"
      ],
      "summary": "AUD25m award; FY21 statement describes three-year grant for platform and analytical-tool design/build/deployment/maintenance. FY24 Modern Slavery Statement reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 report says six-year partnership. Exact agreement/amendment dates, cash schedule and grant rights unresolved. Same award, not additive amounts. Financial details: value: 25,000,000; currency: AUD; kind: stated multi-year grant commitment; period: FY21 describes three years; FY24 reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 describes six-year programme; operative dates unavailable",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-grant",
        "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "committed funding for data sharing",
        "detail": "AUD25m award; FY21 statement describes three-year grant for platform and analytical-tool design/build/deployment/maintenance. FY24 Modern Slavery Statement reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 report says six-year partnership. Exact agreement/amendment dates, cash schedule and grant rights unresolved. Same award, not additive amounts.",
        "date": "FY21 original award description; FY24 extension reported; source terms not fully reconciled",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-westpac2024",
          "w4-fin-s-westpac2021",
          "w4-fin-s-westpac2024",
          "w4-fin-s-programme"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 25,000,000; currency: AUD; kind: stated multi-year grant commitment; period: FY21 describes three years; FY24 reports two-year extension; SCSC2024 describes six-year programme; operative dates unavailable"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-lighthouse",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "label": "operates investigative data application",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-25report",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Report describes an operational application for searching suspected-CSEA data, analytics and links for financial-services and law-enforcement workflows. Data-provider contracts, user access and account-action records are not disclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-lighthouse",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
        "label": "operates investigative data application",
        "detail": "Report describes an operational application for searching suspected-CSEA data, analytics and links for financial-services and law-enforcement workflows. Data-provider contracts, user access and account-action records are not disclosed.",
        "date": "2024-25report",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-coalition",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w3-icmec-saferai",
      "label": "sets participation and guides projects",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Circulated January2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms assign ICMEC Australia membership/partnership determination and project guidance in collaboration with members; removal discretion applies to listed breaches. This is formal capacity, not proof of a particular exercised publication veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-coalition",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w3-icmec-saferai",
        "label": "sets participation and guides projects",
        "detail": "Terms assign ICMEC Australia membership/partnership determination and project guidance in collaboration with members; removal discretion applies to listed breaches. This is formal capacity, not proof of a particular exercised publication veto.",
        "date": "Circulated January2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-partners",
      "source": "w3-icmec-saferai",
      "target": "w3-icmec-partner-category",
      "label": "permits contributions without public attribution",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Circulated January2026",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Partners can join regular discussions and contribute where appropriate without website listing or project credit, unless exceptionally agreed. Existence of the category does not identify actual participants or establish wrongdoing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-partners",
        "source": "w3-icmec-saferai",
        "target": "w3-icmec-partner-category",
        "label": "permits contributions without public attribution",
        "detail": "Partners can join regular discussions and contribute where appropriate without website listing or project credit, unless exceptionally agreed. Existence of the category does not identify actual participants or establish wrongdoing.",
        "date": "Circulated January2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-arthur-bank",
      "source": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
      "target": "w3-icmec-westpac",
      "label": "held financial-crime executive role at",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-25report",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Report lists General Manager Financial Crime and Group MLRO role. No assumption she exercised the bank role in a specific charity decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-arthur-bank",
        "source": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
        "target": "w3-icmec-westpac",
        "label": "held financial-crime executive role at",
        "detail": "Report lists General Manager Financial Crime and Group MLRO role. No assumption she exercised the bank role in a specific charity decision.",
        "date": "2024-25report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-arthur-board",
      "source": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "served as non-executive director of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-25report",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Report lists the board role; nomination rights, conflicts register and decision recusals have not been acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-arthur-board",
        "source": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "served as non-executive director of",
        "detail": "Report lists the board role; nomination rights, conflicts register and decision recusals have not been acquired.",
        "date": "2024-25report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-gannon",
      "source": "w3-icmec-gannon",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "was identified as CEO of",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-04",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-age"
      ],
      "summary": "Author biography and byline identify CEO role.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-gannon",
        "source": "w3-icmec-gannon",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "was identified as CEO of",
        "detail": "Author biography and byline identify CEO role.",
        "date": "2026-05-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-age"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-advocacy",
      "source": "w3-icmec-gannon",
      "target": "w3-icmec-device-advocacy",
      "label": "published device-centred age proposal",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-04",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-age"
      ],
      "summary": "Argues device-level verification can supply age signals across services with less repeated disclosure, while acknowledging implementation friction and circumvention. Reports a Mongolian government delegation meeting. No Westpac earmark or US drafting instruction is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-advocacy",
        "source": "w3-icmec-gannon",
        "target": "w3-icmec-device-advocacy",
        "label": "published device-centred age proposal",
        "detail": "Argues device-level verification can supply age signals across services with less repeated disclosure, while acknowledging implementation friction and circumvention. Reports a Mongolian government delegation meeting. No Westpac earmark or US drafting instruction is established.",
        "date": "2026-05-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-age"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-presentation",
      "source": "bob-cunningham",
      "target": "w3-icmec-jcots",
      "label": "presented device-based age proposal to",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-11-06",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Commission records November6 presentation and questions about shared devices and correct age entry; Cunningham acknowledged continued parental oversight.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-presentation",
        "source": "bob-cunningham",
        "target": "w3-icmec-jcots",
        "label": "presented device-based age proposal to",
        "detail": "Commission records November6 presentation and questions about shared devices and correct age entry; Cunningham acknowledged continued parental oversight.",
        "date": "2024-11-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-draft",
      "source": "w3-icmec-craig",
      "target": "w3-icmec-draft-request",
      "label": "submitted legislative drafting request",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Submitted by2024-12-03; reported at the December3 JCOTS meeting",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024"
      ],
      "summary": "December3 proceedings explicitly attribute the bill concept to the previous ICMEC presentation and say Craig requested a DLS draft. No enacted-law conclusion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-draft",
        "source": "w3-icmec-craig",
        "target": "w3-icmec-draft-request",
        "label": "submitted legislative drafting request",
        "detail": "December3 proceedings explicitly attribute the bill concept to the previous ICMEC presentation and say Craig requested a DLS draft. No enacted-law conclusion.",
        "date": "Submitted by2024-12-03; reported at the December3 JCOTS meeting",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-e-uptake",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "w3-icmec-draft-request",
      "label": "presentation prompted drafting request",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November6 to December3,2024",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024"
      ],
      "summary": "JCOTS itself records this causal connection. This closes a specific advocacy-to-drafting step; authorship of all eventual language and funding remain unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-e-uptake",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "w3-icmec-draft-request",
        "label": "presentation prompted drafting request",
        "detail": "JCOTS itself records this causal connection. This closes a specific advocacy-to-drafting step; authorship of all eventual language and funding remain unresolved.",
        "date": "November6 to December3,2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-e-control-ended",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "ceased sole membership and control",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
      ],
      "summary": "US2023 Note1 says no longer sole member; Note8 says no longer controls. Does not name new members or establish complete US membership withdrawal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-e-control-ended",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "ceased sole membership and control",
        "detail": "US2023 Note1 says no longer sole member; Note8 says no longer controls. Does not name new members or establish complete US membership withdrawal.",
        "date": "2023-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-e-accounting-removal",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w4-fin-deconsolidation",
      "label": "balances removed from US consolidated statements",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Net asset accounting event, not payout, grant or bank transfer. Exact table and restriction-class entry on event node; no donor-specific receivable assignment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-e-accounting-removal",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w4-fin-deconsolidation",
        "label": "balances removed from US consolidated statements",
        "detail": "Net asset accounting event, not payout, grant or bank transfer. Exact table and restriction-class entry on event node; no donor-specific receivable assignment.",
        "date": "2023-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "finance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-publication",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w4-pol-paper",
      "label": "published and promoted",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "26 November2024 publisher notice",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-launch",
        "w4-pol-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Dated publisher notice links the original discussion paper.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-publication",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w4-pol-paper",
        "label": "published and promoted",
        "detail": "Dated publisher notice links the original discussion paper.",
        "date": "26 November2024 publisher notice",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "distribution",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-launch",
          "w4-pol-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-collective-writing",
      "source": "w3-icmec-saferai",
      "target": "w4-pol-paper",
      "label": "reports collaborative writing with member insights",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2024",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Paper p3 attributes collaborative writing to coalition members as a group. Member-specific drafting/approval not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-collective-writing",
        "source": "w3-icmec-saferai",
        "target": "w4-pol-paper",
        "label": "reports collaborative writing with member insights",
        "detail": "Paper p3 attributes collaborative writing to coalition members as a group. Member-specific drafting/approval not established.",
        "date": "November2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-device-ask",
      "source": "w4-pol-paper",
      "target": "w4-pol-device-proposal",
      "label": "recommends considering",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2024",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "P8 lists AI screening in encrypted environments and device-level CSAM detection/blocking among possible initiatives to support; no technical architecture, contract or deployed capability follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-device-ask",
        "source": "w4-pol-paper",
        "target": "w4-pol-device-proposal",
        "label": "recommends considering",
        "detail": "P8 lists AI screening in encrypted environments and device-level CSAM detection/blocking among possible initiatives to support; no technical architecture, contract or deployed capability follows.",
        "date": "November2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-tas-uptake",
      "source": "w4-pol-paper",
      "target": "w4-pol-tas-review",
      "label": "is cited and substantively used in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2025 review",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-paper",
        "w4-pol-s-tas-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed131/PDF132 cites paper in notes124-125, reproduces four proposed AI uses and discusses reThink. The review then develops information-sharing recommendations from multiple grounds; sole causation or device-scanning adoption not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-tas-uptake",
        "source": "w4-pol-paper",
        "target": "w4-pol-tas-review",
        "label": "is cited and substantively used in",
        "detail": "Printed131/PDF132 cites paper in notes124-125, reproduces four proposed AI uses and discusses reThink. The review then develops information-sharing recommendations from multiple grounds; sole causation or device-scanning adoption not established.",
        "date": "November2025 review",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-paper",
          "w4-pol-s-tas-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-reviewer",
      "source": "w4-pol-woolcott",
      "target": "w4-pol-tas-review",
      "label": "is named independent reviewer of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2025",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-tas-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Cover and foreword identify Woolcott; no allocation of particular drafting tasks.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-reviewer",
        "source": "w4-pol-woolcott",
        "target": "w4-pol-tas-review",
        "label": "is named independent reviewer of",
        "detail": "Cover and foreword identify Woolcott; no allocation of particular drafting tasks.",
        "date": "November2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-tas-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-addressee",
      "source": "w4-pol-tas-review",
      "target": "w4-pol-premier-office",
      "label": "is formally addressed to",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2025",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-tas-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Cover says report to Premier Jeremy Rockliff. This is an addressee record, not a receipt or acceptance decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-addressee",
        "source": "w4-pol-tas-review",
        "target": "w4-pol-premier-office",
        "label": "is formally addressed to",
        "detail": "Cover says report to Premier Jeremy Rockliff. This is an addressee record, not a receipt or acceptance decision.",
        "date": "November2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
            "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-tas-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-toolkit-publisher",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "label": "publishes guidance in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Version label4March2026; citation access26November2025",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
      ],
      "summary": "Toolkit describes itself as output of a December2024 eSafety/DHS workshop; paper citation accessed November2025. Do not infer the citation was present at that earlier workshop.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-toolkit-publisher",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
        "label": "publishes guidance in",
        "detail": "Toolkit describes itself as output of a December2024 eSafety/DHS workshop; paper citation accessed November2025. Do not infer the citation was present at that earlier workshop.",
        "date": "Version label4March2026; citation access26November2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-esafety-citation",
      "source": "w4-pol-paper",
      "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "label": "is cited to support AI investigative triage in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 toolkit",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-paper",
        "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed28/PDF15 footnote34 supports classifiers categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying behavioural patterns. Resource listing alone is not the evidence; actual footnote supports scoped use. Other age/identity/encryption sections have separate ancestry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-esafety-citation",
        "source": "w4-pol-paper",
        "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
        "label": "is cited to support AI investigative triage in",
        "detail": "Printed28/PDF15 footnote34 supports classifiers categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying behavioural patterns. Resource listing alone is not the evidence; actual footnote supports scoped use. Other age/identity/encryption sections have separate ancestry.",
        "date": "March2026 toolkit",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-paper",
          "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-jago-role",
      "source": "w4-pol-jago",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "is listed as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator by",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-25 report, published2025",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "2024-25 impact report printed35/PDF18 staff panel. This contemporary role makes a plausible production-record custodian, but does not prove 2024 writing/approval authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-jago-role",
        "source": "w4-pol-jago",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "is listed as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator by",
        "detail": "2024-25 impact report printed35/PDF18 staff panel. This contemporary role makes a plausible production-record custodian, but does not prove 2024 writing/approval authority.",
        "date": "2024-25 report, published2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-build",
      "source": "w4-lh-kablamo",
      "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "label": "reports building the production application",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated vendor account",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-kablamo"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor describes ten active build weeks and four months from onboarding to launch. Calendar dates and independent deployment acceptance are unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-build",
        "source": "w4-lh-kablamo",
        "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
        "label": "reports building the production application",
        "detail": "Vendor describes ten active build weeks and four months from onboarding to launch. Calendar dates and independent deployment acceptance are unverified.",
        "date": "Undated vendor account",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-kablamo"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-support",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w4-lh-kablamo",
      "label": "reportedly engaged ongoing Product Care support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Post-launch; calendar dates unavailable",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-kablamo"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor reports annually renewed support after launch, including patching and incident response. No amount, payment or signed renewal instrument recovered. The same vendor describes a twelve-month knowledge-transfer programme intended to let ICMEC sustain and extend the platform independently; this also remains vendor-attributed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-support",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w4-lh-kablamo",
        "label": "reportedly engaged ongoing Product Care support",
        "detail": "Vendor reports annually renewed support after launch, including patching and incident response. No amount, payment or signed renewal instrument recovered. The same vendor describes a twelve-month knowledge-transfer programme intended to let ICMEC sustain and extend the platform independently; this also remains vendor-attributed.",
        "date": "Post-launch; calendar dates unavailable",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-kablamo"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-owner",
      "source": "w4-lh-product-owner",
      "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "label": "reportedly made technical delivery decisions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated vendor delivery account",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-kablamo"
      ],
      "summary": "Delivery account identifies decision-making by an unnamed product owner. It does not identify budget approval, intelligence thresholds, bank action or policy clearance rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-owner",
        "source": "w4-lh-product-owner",
        "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
        "label": "reportedly made technical delivery decisions",
        "detail": "Delivery account identifies decision-making by an unnamed product owner. It does not identify budget approval, intelligence thresholds, bank action or policy clearance rights.",
        "date": "Undated vendor delivery account",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-kablamo"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-feeds",
      "source": "w4-lh-data-suppliers",
      "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "label": "reportedly supplied suspected-activity data",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "1 July 2024–30 June 2025 reported metrics",
      "sources": [
        "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "ICMEC reports ingestion of just under eight million records in FY2024-25, including over 70,000 geolocated to Australia. These are records, not proven offences, unique people, alerts or account closures; suppliers and licence terms remain unnamed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-feeds",
        "source": "w4-lh-data-suppliers",
        "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
        "label": "reportedly supplied suspected-activity data",
        "detail": "ICMEC reports ingestion of just under eight million records in FY2024-25, including over 70,000 geolocated to Australia. These are records, not proven offences, unique people, alerts or account closures; suppliers and licence terms remain unnamed.",
        "date": "1 July 2024–30 June 2025 reported metrics",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-local-use",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
      "label": "stated Australian-soil use restriction",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Stated in 30 October 2024 event programme",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-symposium2024"
      ],
      "summary": "The dated programme states use is restricted to Australian soil. It separately limits the introductory session to specified Australian regulators, financial/CSE professionals, banks/remitters and child-protection law enforcement. It does not establish current licence terms, access enforcement or actual participants.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-local-use",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
        "label": "stated Australian-soil use restriction",
        "detail": "The dated programme states use is restricted to Australian soil. It separately limits the introductory session to specified Australian regulators, financial/CSE professionals, banks/remitters and child-protection law enforcement. It does not establish current licence terms, access enforcement or actual participants.",
        "date": "Stated in 30 October 2024 event programme",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-symposium2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-huntsman-austrac",
      "source": "w4-lh-austrac",
      "target": "w4-lh-huntsman",
      "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "15 September 2025 published account",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman"
      ],
      "summary": "AUSTRAC identifies Operation Huntsman as a joint ACCCE–AUSTRAC initiative. No recovered record connects this operation to Lighthouse.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-huntsman-austrac",
        "source": "w4-lh-austrac",
        "target": "w4-lh-huntsman",
        "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
        "detail": "AUSTRAC identifies Operation Huntsman as a joint ACCCE–AUSTRAC initiative. No recovered record connects this operation to Lighthouse.",
        "date": "15 September 2025 published account",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-huntsman-accce",
      "source": "w4-lh-accce",
      "target": "w4-lh-huntsman",
      "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "15 September 2025 published account",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman"
      ],
      "summary": "ACCCE is the other named initiative participant; this is not a statement about Lighthouse access or data supply.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-huntsman-accce",
        "source": "w4-lh-accce",
        "target": "w4-lh-huntsman",
        "label": "named as joint initiative participant",
        "detail": "ACCCE is the other named initiative participant; this is not a statement about Lighthouse access or data supply.",
        "date": "15 September 2025 published account",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-e-huntsman-closures",
      "source": "w4-lh-huntsman",
      "target": "w4-lh-huntsman-closures",
      "label": "reportedly led to bank-account closures",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Cumulative since June 2022; reported 15 September 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman"
      ],
      "summary": "AUSTRAC reports more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments closed since June 2022. It is an agency-reported aggregate, not an audited account ledger. No recovered Lighthouse attribution; absence of that attribution does not prove non-involvement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-e-huntsman-closures",
        "source": "w4-lh-huntsman",
        "target": "w4-lh-huntsman-closures",
        "label": "reportedly led to bank-account closures",
        "detail": "AUSTRAC reports more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments closed since June 2022. It is an agency-reported aggregate, not an audited account ledger. No recovered Lighthouse attribution; absence of that attribution does not prove non-involvement.",
        "date": "Cumulative since June 2022; reported 15 September 2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-e-esafety-encryption",
      "source": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "target": "w4-pol-esafety-encryption-guidance",
      "label": "advises industry to consider",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Toolkit version displayed4March2026",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed24/PDF13 case study lists client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based E2EE deployment and conditional limits on E2EE. This is an affirmative guidance recommendation. Source efficacy/privacy assurances remain attributed; the SaferAI citation elsewhere does not establish origin of these recommendations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-e-esafety-encryption",
        "source": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
        "target": "w4-pol-esafety-encryption-guidance",
        "label": "advises industry to consider",
        "detail": "Printed24/PDF13 case study lists client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based E2EE deployment and conditional limits on E2EE. This is an affirmative guidance recommendation. Source efficacy/privacy assurances remain attributed; the SaferAI citation elsewhere does not establish origin of these recommendations.",
        "date": "Toolkit version displayed4March2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-us-renewal-exception",
      "source": "w5-gov-constitution",
      "target": "icmec",
      "label": "exempts from membership renewal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July2023-labeled text and March2025 text; exact adoption dates unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Clause15.2 specifically names ICMEC US. Establishes a constitutional exception, not actual membership, voting exercise or control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-us-renewal-exception",
        "source": "w5-gov-constitution",
        "target": "icmec",
        "label": "exempts from membership renewal",
        "detail": "Clause15.2 specifically names ICMEC US. Establishes a constitutional exception, not actual membership, voting exercise or control.",
        "date": "July2023-labeled text and March2025 text; exact adoption dates unresolved",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-admission",
      "source": "w5-gov-au-board",
      "target": "w5-gov-au-members",
      "label": "decides admission applications to",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Clauses13–14: board approves applicants and secretary enters approved names; membership starts on register entry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-admission",
        "source": "w5-gov-au-board",
        "target": "w5-gov-au-members",
        "label": "decides admission applications to",
        "detail": "Clauses13–14: board approves applicants and secretary enters approved names; membership starts on register entry.",
        "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-election",
      "source": "w5-gov-au-members",
      "target": "w5-gov-au-board",
      "label": "elects and may remove directors of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
      ],
      "summary": "One vote per member(cl33); member election(cl40) and removal(cl42); board also has specified vacancy-filling powers. No actual member list recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-election",
        "source": "w5-gov-au-members",
        "target": "w5-gov-au-board",
        "label": "elects and may remove directors of",
        "detail": "One vote per member(cl33); member election(cl40) and removal(cl42); board also has specified vacancy-filling powers. No actual member list recovered.",
        "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts;6July2023 adoption gap retained",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-board-approvals",
      "source": "w5-gov-au-board",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "approves strategy budgets major partnerships and material programs for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Charter expressly adopted/effective6December2023; retrieved September2026",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-charter"
      ],
      "summary": "Charter2.1–2.3,4.2 reserves concrete approvals and management delegation. Does not prove any specified research paper or grant was approved by a named participant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-board-approvals",
        "source": "w5-gov-au-board",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "approves strategy budgets major partnerships and material programs for",
        "detail": "Charter2.1–2.3,4.2 reserves concrete approvals and management delegation. Does not prove any specified research paper or grant was approved by a named participant.",
        "date": "Charter expressly adopted/effective6December2023; retrieved September2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-charter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-member-register",
      "source": "w5-gov-au-secretary",
      "target": "w5-gov-au-members",
      "label": "maintains register of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published July2023/March2025 texts",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Clauses10 and58 assign membership register and company meeting/resolution records to secretary. Names and institutional role dates are the relevant requested extract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-member-register",
        "source": "w5-gov-au-secretary",
        "target": "w5-gov-au-members",
        "label": "maintains register of",
        "detail": "Clauses10 and58 assign membership register and company meeting/resolution records to secretary. Names and institutional role dates are the relevant requested extract.",
        "date": "Published July2023/March2025 texts",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-conflict-records",
      "source": "w5-gov-au-secretary",
      "target": "w5-gov-au-board",
      "label": "maintains interests register and recorded conflict decisions for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published policy metadata Approved May23; March2025 constitution; actual compliance unobserved",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-conflicts",
        "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy5.2–6.2 and Constitution50: disclosure/recording and recusal rules including exceptions. Not evidence any particular conflict was declared or managed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-conflict-records",
        "source": "w5-gov-au-secretary",
        "target": "w5-gov-au-board",
        "label": "maintains interests register and recorded conflict decisions for",
        "detail": "Policy5.2–6.2 and Constitution50: disclosure/recording and recusal rules including exceptions. Not evidence any particular conflict was declared or managed.",
        "date": "Published policy metadata Approved May23; March2025 constitution; actual compliance unobserved",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-conflicts",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-arthur-board",
      "source": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
      "target": "w5-gov-au-board",
      "label": "is publicly listed as non-executive director on",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Website snapshot8September2026 local; appointment interval not established",
      "sources": [
        "w5-gov-s-board"
      ],
      "summary": "Current board page also describes Westpac financial-crime executive role. External employer does not thereby obtain the board powers or a reserved appointment right.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-arthur-board",
        "source": "w3-icmec-jodie-arthur",
        "target": "w5-gov-au-board",
        "label": "is publicly listed as non-executive director on",
        "detail": "Current board page also describes Westpac financial-crime executive role. External employer does not thereby obtain the board powers or a reserved appointment right.",
        "date": "Website snapshot8September2026 local; appointment interval not established",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-board"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-e-component-received",
      "source": "w5-gov-grf",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "reports receipt of component auditor financial statements and reports for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Period ended6July2023;US audit report30January2025",
      "sources": [
        "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
      ],
      "summary": "US auditor report PDF3/printed2 identifies Australian period ended6July2023 and says component auditors reports furnished. Names GRF in header, not Australian component auditor.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-e-component-received",
        "source": "w5-gov-grf",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "reports receipt of component auditor financial statements and reports for",
        "detail": "US auditor report PDF3/printed2 identifies Australian period ended6July2023 and says component auditors reports furnished. Names GRF in header, not Australian component auditor.",
        "date": "Period ended6July2023;US audit report30January2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-ukri",
      "source": "w5-enc-ukri",
      "target": "w5-enc-rephrain",
      "label": "is acknowledged as funding",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-ukri",
        "source": "w5-enc-ukri",
        "target": "w5-enc-rephrain",
        "label": "is acknowledged as funding",
        "detail": "Report p5 identifies UKRI funding of REPHRAIN as a three-year Centre of Research Excellence. No award value, payment or approval terms acquired.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-project-funding",
      "source": "w5-enc-rephrain",
      "target": "w5-enc-toolbox",
      "label": "funds through its fourth Strategic Funding Call",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "UKRI collaboration row gives start year2023; award announcement18 January 2024; executed award dates and payment schedule not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper",
        "w5-enc-s-dfc",
        "w6-award-s-launch",
        "w6-award-s-gtr"
      ],
      "summary": "The fourth-call award is now corroborated by REPHRAIN announcement and UKRI-hosted Cambridge collaboration record. They identify competitive selection, funding and intended integration of outputs into REPHRAIN resources. Neither gives the Toolbox allocation or publication-control terms. Parent centre grant value must not be assigned to this project.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-project-funding",
        "source": "w5-enc-rephrain",
        "target": "w5-enc-toolbox",
        "label": "funds through its fourth Strategic Funding Call",
        "detail": "The fourth-call award is now corroborated by REPHRAIN announcement and UKRI-hosted Cambridge collaboration record. They identify competitive selection, funding and intended integration of outputs into REPHRAIN resources. Neither gives the Toolbox allocation or publication-control terms. Parent centre grant value must not be assigned to this project.",
        "date": "UKRI collaboration row gives start year2023; award announcement18 January 2024; executed award dates and payment schedule not acquired.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
            "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
            "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper",
          "w5-enc-s-dfc",
          "w6-award-s-launch",
          "w6-award-s-gtr"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-workpackage",
      "source": "w5-enc-toolbox",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "includes as work package3 deliverable",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p8 explicitly locates this report in the Toolbox project, alongside measurement/data work packages.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-workpackage",
        "source": "w5-enc-toolbox",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "includes as work package3 deliverable",
        "detail": "Report p8 explicitly locates this report in the Toolbox project, alongside measurement/data work packages.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-centre-funding",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "w5-enc-dfc",
      "label": "is acknowledged as funding the centre",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Back cover p61 identifies centre-level support. It does not disclose a report-specific 5Rights award, amount, or editorial rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-centre-funding",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "w5-enc-dfc",
        "label": "is acknowledged as funding the centre",
        "detail": "Back cover p61 identifies centre-level support. It does not disclose a report-specific 5Rights award, amount, or editorial rights.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-publisher",
      "source": "w5-enc-dfc",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "publishes",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 cover; 5Rights notice4Dec2024; LSE deposited3Dec2024",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper",
        "w5-enc-s-record"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p61 self-citation and LSE record identify DFC/LSE/5Rights publication.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-publisher",
        "source": "w5-enc-dfc",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "publishes",
        "detail": "Report p61 self-citation and LSE record identify DFC/LSE/5Rights publication.",
        "date": "December2024 cover; 5Rights notice4Dec2024; LSE deposited3Dec2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper",
          "w5-enc-s-record"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-lead",
      "source": "w5-enc-orben",
      "target": "w5-enc-toolbox",
      "label": "is identified as project lead of",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p8 names Amy Orben (University of Cambridge) as project lead; does not make her an author of this report.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-lead",
        "source": "w5-enc-orben",
        "target": "w5-enc-toolbox",
        "label": "is identified as project lead of",
        "detail": "Report p8 names Amy Orben (University of Cambridge) as project lead; does not make her an author of this report.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-author-spuy",
      "source": "w5-enc-spuy",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report cover names Anri van der Spuy; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-author-spuy",
        "source": "w5-enc-spuy",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Report cover names Anri van der Spuy; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-author-witting",
      "source": "w5-enc-witting",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report cover names Sabine Witting; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-author-witting",
        "source": "w5-enc-witting",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Report cover names Sabine Witting; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-author-burton",
      "source": "w5-enc-burton",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report cover names Patrick Burton; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-author-burton",
        "source": "w5-enc-burton",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Report cover names Patrick Burton; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-author-day",
      "source": "w5-enc-day",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report cover names Emma Day; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-author-day",
        "source": "w5-enc-day",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Report cover names Emma Day; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-author-livingstone",
      "source": "w5-enc-livingstone",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report cover names Sonia Livingstone; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-author-livingstone",
        "source": "w5-enc-livingstone",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Report cover names Sonia Livingstone; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-author-sylwander",
      "source": "w5-enc-sylwander",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report cover names Kim R. Sylwander; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-author-sylwander",
        "source": "w5-enc-sylwander",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Report cover names Kim R. Sylwander; individual paragraph authorship not allocated.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-review",
      "source": "w5-enc-nicholas",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Acknowledgements p5 identify review participation. No manuscript comments, editorial veto, or toolkit drafting established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-review",
        "source": "w5-enc-nicholas",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
        "detail": "Acknowledgements p5 identify review participation. No manuscript comments, editorial veto, or toolkit drafting established.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-affiliation",
      "source": "w5-enc-nicholas",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "is affiliated with in the report acknowledgement",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p5 identifies Australian e-Safety Commissioner Office affiliation at publication; not a current staff verification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-affiliation",
        "source": "w5-enc-nicholas",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "is affiliated with in the report acknowledgement",
        "detail": "Report p5 identifies Australian e-Safety Commissioner Office affiliation at publication; not a current staff verification.",
        "date": "December2024 report; underlying dates unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-fn29",
      "source": "w5-enc-paper",
      "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "label": "is linked by footnote29 beside homomorphic-encryption guidance in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote access30Jan2026",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit",
        "w5-enc-s-paper",
        "w5-enc-s-record"
      ],
      "summary": "Footnote29 follows the second item only; report/metadata do not identify Security and Safety vol4 as publication. This is citation placement, not verified technical support or authorship of the list.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-fn29",
        "source": "w5-enc-paper",
        "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
        "label": "is linked by footnote29 beside homomorphic-encryption guidance in",
        "detail": "Footnote29 follows the second item only; report/metadata do not identify Security and Safety vol4 as publication. This is citation placement, not verified technical support or authorship of the list.",
        "date": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote access30Jan2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit",
          "w5-enc-s-paper",
          "w5-enc-s-record"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-fn26",
      "source": "w5-enc-paper",
      "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
      "label": "is cited at footnote26 for platform-hopping context in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote26 access10Jan2025",
      "sources": [
        "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit",
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p34 matches toolkit claim about movement to encrypted messaging. This separately supported contextual citation does not establish the homomorphic recommendation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-fn26",
        "source": "w5-enc-paper",
        "target": "w4-pol-esafety-toolkit",
        "label": "is cited at footnote26 for platform-hopping context in",
        "detail": "Report p34 matches toolkit claim about movement to encrypted messaging. This separately supported contextual citation does not establish the homomorphic recommendation.",
        "date": "Toolkit labelled v 4 March 2026; exact publication day not established; footnote26 access10Jan2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit",
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-workshop",
      "source": "w5-enc-workshop",
      "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "label": "is identified as an input to toolkit drafting before",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dec2024 workshop; 5May2025 invitation",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "5May2025 invitation says toolkit was shaped since the Dec2024 workshop. It lists E2EE and AI in draft core content but does not reproduce particular recommendations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-workshop",
        "source": "w5-enc-workshop",
        "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "label": "is identified as an input to toolkit drafting before",
        "detail": "5May2025 invitation says toolkit was shaped since the Dec2024 workshop. It lists E2EE and AI in draft core content but does not reproduce particular recommendations.",
        "date": "Dec2024 workshop; 5May2025 invitation",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-consultation",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "label": "invites written edits and verbal feedback through",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "5May2025 invitation quoted in16May chain",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "Doc19 pp30-31: AttachmentA core content and AttachmentB tools; emphasis on B; deadline16May, optional20May meeting, second final-draft redline opportunity announced. These are offered process steps, not proof all occurred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-consultation",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "label": "invites written edits and verbal feedback through",
        "detail": "Doc19 pp30-31: AttachmentA core content and AttachmentB tools; emphasis on B; deadline16May, optional20May meeting, second final-draft redline opportunity announced. These are offered process steps, not proof all occurred.",
        "date": "5May2025 invitation quoted in16May chain",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-x-access",
      "source": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "target": "w5-enc-x",
      "label": "provides draft-toolkit review opportunity to",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "5May2025",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "Released 5May invitation to @x.com, in Doc19. Access is specific to this consultation, not evidence of drafting responsibility.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-x-access",
        "source": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "target": "w5-enc-x",
        "label": "provides draft-toolkit review opportunity to",
        "detail": "Released 5May invitation to @x.com, in Doc19. Access is specific to this consultation, not evidence of drafting responsibility.",
        "date": "5May2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-x-response",
      "source": "w5-enc-x",
      "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "label": "replies that it has no additional feedback to",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "16May2025 response",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "Doc19 PDF29 displays response16May2025 11:33PM. Does not establish endorsement of final2026 text or absence of all other communications.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-x-response",
        "source": "w5-enc-x",
        "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "label": "replies that it has no additional feedback to",
        "detail": "Doc19 PDF29 displays response16May2025 11:33PM. Does not establish endorsement of final2026 text or absence of all other communications.",
        "date": "16May2025 response",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-grant2021",
      "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
      "target": "w5-fund-project2021",
      "label": "announced research award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants"
      ],
      "summary": "Westpac lists the UNSW Australian Human Rights Institute project within research grants of $150,000 each over up to two years. AUD is contextual to the Australian grant programme, not an explicit currency code in this page. Not a disbursement and not an earmark from ICMEC's $25m partnership. Financial details: value: 150,000; currency: AUD; kind: announced award; period: 2021 research grant; up to two years",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-grant2021",
        "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
        "target": "w5-fund-project2021",
        "label": "announced research award",
        "detail": "Westpac lists the UNSW Australian Human Rights Institute project within research grants of $150,000 each over up to two years. AUD is contextual to the Australian grant programme, not an explicit currency code in this page. Not a disbursement and not an earmark from ICMEC's $25m partnership.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 150,000; currency: AUD; kind: announced award; period: 2021 research grant; up to two years"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-recipient",
      "source": "w5-fund-unsw",
      "target": "w5-fund-project2021",
      "label": "named institution for project",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants"
      ],
      "summary": "2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-recipient",
        "source": "w5-fund-unsw",
        "target": "w5-fund-project2021",
        "label": "named institution for project",
        "detail": "2021 recipient entry identifies Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW. Signed project agreement and precise award-to-output allocation not acquired.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-study-funding",
      "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
      "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "research funding acknowledged",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight",
        "w6-award-s-methods"
      ],
      "summary": "Study C credits Westpac funding. The later author methods account credits Westpac for the underlying survey and reports expansion to UK/US samples at no extra cost following ethical/stakeholder approval. Neither specifies how the 2021 award, later analysis costs or institutional core support were allocated; no publication right or veto established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-study-funding",
        "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
        "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "label": "research funding acknowledged",
        "detail": "Study C credits Westpac funding. The later author methods account credits Westpac for the underlying survey and reports expansion to UK/US samples at no extra cost following ethical/stakeholder approval. Neither specifies how the 2021 award, later analysis costs or institutional core support were allocated; no publication right or veto established.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight",
          "w6-award-s-methods"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-publication",
      "source": "w5-fund-childlight",
      "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "published in Searchlight 2025",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Childlight published Study C with named researchers, funding and advice disclosures.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-publication",
        "source": "w5-fund-childlight",
        "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "label": "published in Searchlight 2025",
        "detail": "Childlight published Study C with named researchers, funding and advice disclosures.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-core-funding",
      "source": "w5-fund-hdf",
      "target": "w5-fund-childlight",
      "label": "core grant acknowledged",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-core-funding",
        "source": "w5-fund-hdf",
        "target": "w5-fund-childlight",
        "label": "core grant acknowledged",
        "detail": "Report identifies Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. UNSW hub support is through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under that core grant; no amount or Westpac co-funder control right established.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-advice",
      "source": "w5-fund-advisory",
      "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "advisory committee listed",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Study C names a committee including Ashley Katz, Denzil Clark, Mark Dickson, Sarah Napier, Carol Ronken and Danielle Kelly. Listing does not reveal meeting attendance, edits or final approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-advice",
        "source": "w5-fund-advisory",
        "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "label": "advisory committee listed",
        "detail": "Study C names a committee including Ashley Katz, Denzil Clark, Mark Dickson, Sarah Napier, Carol Ronken and Danielle Kelly. Listing does not reveal meeting attendance, edits or final approval.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-bank-adviser",
      "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
      "target": "w5-fund-advisory",
      "label": "executive named as adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Study C identifies Mark Dickson, Executive Manager Financial Crime at Westpac, as an adviser. No claim that he exercised the bank's editorial veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-bank-adviser",
        "source": "w3-icmec-westpac",
        "target": "w5-fund-advisory",
        "label": "executive named as adviser",
        "detail": "Study C identifies Mark Dickson, Executive Manager Financial Crime at Westpac, as an adviser. No claim that he exercised the bank's editorial veto.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-icmec-adviser",
      "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "target": "w5-fund-advisory",
      "label": "capacity lead named as adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Study C identifies Danielle Kelly, Head of Capacity and Prevention at ICMEC Australia, as an adviser. No evidence this was a Lighthouse evaluation or SaferAI drafting group.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-icmec-adviser",
        "source": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "target": "w5-fund-advisory",
        "label": "capacity lead named as adviser",
        "detail": "Study C identifies Danielle Kelly, Head of Capacity and Prevention at ICMEC Australia, as an adviser. No evidence this was a Lighthouse evaluation or SaferAI drafting group.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-jss-partner",
      "source": "w5-fund-jss",
      "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "study partner listed",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-jss-partner",
        "source": "w5-fund-jss",
        "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "label": "study partner listed",
        "detail": "Jesuit Social Services is named study partner. Report-wide acknowledgements thank it for funding two studies without allocating amounts. Do not double count or invent a pass-through.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-recommendation",
      "source": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "target": "w5-fund-monitoring",
      "label": "recommends expanded monitoring and sharing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Study C recommends widening financial detection and sharing across finance, technology and law enforcement. Its survey-panel/self-report and legal-category limitations do not establish an operational classifier or account-closure rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-recommendation",
        "source": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "target": "w5-fund-monitoring",
        "label": "recommends expanded monitoring and sharing",
        "detail": "Study C recommends widening financial detection and sharing across finance, technology and law enforcement. Its survey-panel/self-report and legal-category limitations do not establish an operational classifier or account-closure rule.",
        "date": "Historical publication or award as specified; effective relationship interval unresolved.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-salter-author",
      "source": "w5-fund-salter",
      "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "is named author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "Searchlight2025 Study C identifies Michael Salter as an author/researcher. Particular recommendation authorship is not allocated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-salter-author",
        "source": "w5-fund-salter",
        "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "label": "is named author of",
        "detail": "Searchlight2025 Study C identifies Michael Salter as an author/researcher. Particular recommendation authorship is not allocated.",
        "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-e-salter-review",
      "source": "w5-fund-salter",
      "target": "w5-enc-paper",
      "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "DFC December2024 report p5 identifies Michael Salter of Childlight, UNSW among independent reviewers. No review comments or accepted edits recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-e-salter-review",
        "source": "w5-fund-salter",
        "target": "w5-enc-paper",
        "label": "is named independent peer reviewer of",
        "detail": "DFC December2024 report p5 identifies Michael Salter of Childlight, UNSW among independent reviewers. No review comments or accepted edits recovered.",
        "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-e-x-dispute",
      "source": "w5-enc-x",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "contests standard applicability in a recorded court dispute with",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "FOI Doc21 PDF34 is eSafety's 21 May 2025 reply referencing X Corp v eSafety, NSD751/2025. eSafety refuses the requested undertaking concerning non-enforcement while proceedings continue. Consultation coexisted with dispute; no court outcome, current applicability determination or connection to particular toolkit wording is claimed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-e-x-dispute",
        "source": "w5-enc-x",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "contests standard applicability in a recorded court dispute with",
        "detail": "FOI Doc21 PDF34 is eSafety's 21 May 2025 reply referencing X Corp v eSafety, NSD751/2025. eSafety refuses the requested undertaking concerning non-enforcement while proceedings continue. Consultation coexisted with dispute; no court outcome, current applicability determination or connection to particular toolkit wording is claimed.",
        "date": "Dated document roles as specified; full effective interval unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-levy-role",
      "source": "w6-ref-levy",
      "target": "w6-ref-ncsc",
      "label": "is identified as technical director of",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical cover affiliation. Does not establish a funded advocacy instruction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-levy-role",
        "source": "w6-ref-levy",
        "target": "w6-ref-ncsc",
        "label": "is identified as technical director of",
        "detail": "Historical cover affiliation. Does not establish a funded advocacy instruction.",
        "date": "July 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-robinson-role",
      "source": "w6-ref-robinson",
      "target": "w6-ref-gchq",
      "label": "is identified as technical director for cryptanalysis at",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical cover affiliation; not current employment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-robinson-role",
        "source": "w6-ref-robinson",
        "target": "w6-ref-gchq",
        "label": "is identified as technical director for cryptanalysis at",
        "detail": "Historical cover affiliation; not current employment.",
        "date": "July 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-levy-author",
      "source": "w6-ref-levy",
      "target": "w6-ref-paper",
      "label": "coauthors",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-levy-author",
        "source": "w6-ref-levy",
        "target": "w6-ref-paper",
        "label": "coauthors",
        "detail": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
        "date": "July 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-robinson-author",
      "source": "w6-ref-robinson",
      "target": "w6-ref-paper",
      "label": "coauthors",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-robinson-author",
        "source": "w6-ref-robinson",
        "target": "w6-ref-paper",
        "label": "coauthors",
        "detail": "Authored technical proposal with express limits on policy and completeness.",
        "date": "July 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-eu-citation",
      "source": "w6-ref-ec-defence",
      "target": "w6-ref-paper",
      "label": "cites to support possible encrypted-service detection",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "7August 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-ec",
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Actual citation in political argument; not proof of efficacy or adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-eu-citation",
        "source": "w6-ref-ec-defence",
        "target": "w6-ref-paper",
        "label": "cites to support possible encrypted-service detection",
        "detail": "Actual citation in political argument; not proof of efficacy or adoption.",
        "date": "7August 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-ec",
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-eu-publisher",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w6-ref-ec-defence",
      "label": "publishes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "7August 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-ec"
      ],
      "summary": "Archived Commission communication. Current page credits DG Communication; no named individual attribution inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-eu-publisher",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w6-ref-ec-defence",
        "label": "publishes",
        "detail": "Archived Commission communication. Current page credits DG Communication; no named individual attribution inferred.",
        "date": "7August 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
            "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-ec"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-au-citation",
      "source": "w6-ref-position",
      "target": "w6-ref-paper",
      "label": "cites in discussion of client-side scanning",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "13October 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-position",
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Agency cites the paper while also describing security concerns. Establishes earlier consideration, not later draft transmission.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-au-citation",
        "source": "w6-ref-position",
        "target": "w6-ref-paper",
        "label": "cites in discussion of client-side scanning",
        "detail": "Agency cites the paper while also describing security concerns. Establishes earlier consideration, not later draft transmission.",
        "date": "13October 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-position",
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-au-publisher",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w6-ref-position",
      "label": "publishes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "13October 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-position"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy statement discusses detection options and limits before the 2024 DFC and SaferAI reports.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-au-publisher",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w6-ref-position",
        "label": "publishes",
        "detail": "Policy statement discusses detection options and limits before the 2024 DFC and SaferAI reports.",
        "date": "13October 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-position"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-rephrain",
      "source": "w6-ref-paper",
      "target": "w5-enc-rephrain",
      "label": "points to separate evaluation work at",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2022",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Reference is to Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation, not the later Toolbox award.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-rephrain",
        "source": "w6-ref-paper",
        "target": "w5-enc-rephrain",
        "label": "points to separate evaluation work at",
        "detail": "Reference is to Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation, not the later Toolbox award.",
        "date": "July 2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
            "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-wp-input",
      "source": "wp-secretariat",
      "target": "w6-ref-consultation",
      "label": "advocates detection options in submission to",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January 2024",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-wp"
      ],
      "summary": "Secretariat supports client-side, homomorphic and secure-enclave approaches while requiring more testing. Does not necessarily represent members.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-wp-input",
        "source": "wp-secretariat",
        "target": "w6-ref-consultation",
        "label": "advocates detection options in submission to",
        "detail": "Secretariat supports client-side, homomorphic and secure-enclave approaches while requiring more testing. Does not necessarily represent members.",
        "date": "January 2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-wp"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-e-drw-input",
      "source": "w6-ref-drw",
      "target": "w6-ref-consultation",
      "label": "opposes encrypted-content detection proposals in submission to",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "21December 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w6-ref-s-drw"
      ],
      "summary": "Formal counterargument on technical feasibility and privacy; not proof every asserted performance figure is correct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-e-drw-input",
        "source": "w6-ref-drw",
        "target": "w6-ref-consultation",
        "label": "opposes encrypted-content detection proposals in submission to",
        "detail": "Formal counterargument on technical feasibility and privacy; not proof every asserted performance figure is correct.",
        "date": "21December 2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-drw"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-may-a",
      "source": "w6-draft-may-a",
      "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "label": "is named core-content attachment to",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "5May 2025 invitation",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment A. Doc19PDF30 lists core-content topics. Exact text, including E2EE wording, remains unread.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-may-a",
        "source": "w6-draft-may-a",
        "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "label": "is named core-content attachment to",
        "detail": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment A. Doc19PDF30 lists core-content topics. Exact text, including E2EE wording, remains unread.",
        "date": "5May 2025 invitation",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-may-b",
      "source": "w6-draft-may-b",
      "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
      "label": "is named tools attachment to",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "5May 2025 invitation",
      "sources": [
        "w5-enc-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment B; Doc19PDF30-31 asks particular attention and marked-up feedback on this attachment. Actual file and returned edits not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-may-b",
        "source": "w6-draft-may-b",
        "target": "w5-enc-consultation",
        "label": "is named tools attachment to",
        "detail": "Indexed Doc13 first-page header names Attachment B; Doc19PDF30-31 asks particular attention and marked-up feedback on this attachment. Actual file and returned edits not obtained.",
        "date": "5May 2025 invitation",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-workshop",
      "source": "common-sense-media",
      "target": "w5-enc-workshop",
      "label": "reports participation in",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December2024 participation retrospectively reported31October 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w6-draft-s-csm-comments"
      ],
      "summary": "The31October 2025 comments p1 describe inclusion in eSafety December2024 workshop. This is the participant's account; no attendance roster independently acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-workshop",
        "source": "common-sense-media",
        "target": "w5-enc-workshop",
        "label": "reports participation in",
        "detail": "The31October 2025 comments p1 describe inclusion in eSafety December2024 workshop. This is the participant's account; no attendance roster independently acquired.",
        "date": "December2024 participation retrospectively reported31October 2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-draft-s-csm-comments"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-publication",
      "source": "common-sense-media",
      "target": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
      "label": "authors and publicly lists",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Comments dated31October 2025; upload date unknown; publicly observed8September2026local",
      "sources": [
        "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
        "w6-draft-s-csm-filings"
      ],
      "summary": "Comments name Common Sense Media as sender; publisher filings directory links the exactPDF under2025 and International.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-publication",
        "source": "common-sense-media",
        "target": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
        "label": "authors and publicly lists",
        "detail": "Comments name Common Sense Media as sender; publisher filings directory links the exactPDF under2025 and International.",
        "date": "Comments dated31October 2025; upload date unknown; publicly observed8September2026local",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
          "w6-draft-s-csm-filings"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-recipient",
      "source": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "addresses requested draft feedback to",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "31October 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w6-draft-s-csm-comments"
      ],
      "summary": "P1 names Australian eSafety Commissioner and says comments respond to a request for review. Recipient acknowledgment or receipt timestamp not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-recipient",
        "source": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "addresses requested draft feedback to",
        "detail": "P1 names Australian eSafety Commissioner and says comments respond to a request for review. Recipient acknowledgment or receipt timestamp not obtained.",
        "date": "31October 2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-draft-s-csm-comments"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-draft",
      "source": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
      "target": "w6-draft-october-draft",
      "label": "comments on",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "31October 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
        "w6-draft-s-disclosure-log"
      ],
      "summary": "P1 identifies the named Designing for Safety draft report. Exact draft and change disposition are unavailable. This review falls outside FOI25139 Jan1-Jun23 2025 scope.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-draft",
        "source": "w6-draft-csm-comments",
        "target": "w6-draft-october-draft",
        "label": "comments on",
        "detail": "P1 identifies the named Designing for Safety draft report. Exact draft and change disposition are unavailable. This review falls outside FOI25139 Jan1-Jun23 2025 scope.",
        "date": "31October 2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
          "w6-draft-s-disclosure-log"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-age-detail",
      "source": "common-sense-media",
      "target": "w6-draft-october-draft",
      "label": "requests clearer age-assurance performance and privacy requirements in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "31October 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w6-draft-s-csm-comments"
      ],
      "summary": "P2 calls for acceptable error rates, fallback procedures and data-minimization clarity, citing a NewYork proposed-rulemaking model. This records a specific requested change; adoption and underlying US law were not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-e-csm-age-detail",
        "source": "common-sense-media",
        "target": "w6-draft-october-draft",
        "label": "requests clearer age-assurance performance and privacy requirements in",
        "detail": "P2 calls for acceptable error rates, fallback procedures and data-minimization clarity, citing a NewYork proposed-rulemaking model. This records a specific requested change; adoption and underlying US law were not established.",
        "date": "31October 2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-draft-s-csm-comments"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-e-tax-related-return",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "reports a related-corporation characterization of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 calendar-year return signed 6 December 2024; no inferred effective date for Australian membership rights",
      "sources": [
        "w6-member-s-us9902023",
        "w6-member-s-irs2023",
        "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Schedule R Part IV Australia row reports ICMEC as direct controlling entity, C CORP tax class, 100% ownership and controlled Yes. These are reported tax characterizations, not independently established continuing control after 6 July 2023. Inclusion can reflect an any-time relationship; percentage ownership uses the related entity tax-year end. Applicable Australian tax period and supporting basis remain unresolved. Original is a publisher-hosted signed public copy; IRS receipt or acceptance was not independently read.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-e-tax-related-return",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "reports a related-corporation characterization of",
        "detail": "Schedule R Part IV Australia row reports ICMEC as direct controlling entity, C CORP tax class, 100% ownership and controlled Yes. These are reported tax characterizations, not independently established continuing control after 6 July 2023. Inclusion can reflect an any-time relationship; percentage ownership uses the related entity tax-year end. Applicable Australian tax period and supporting basis remain unresolved. Original is a publisher-hosted signed public copy; IRS receipt or acceptance was not independently read.",
        "date": "2023 calendar-year return signed 6 December 2024; no inferred effective date for Australian membership rights",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-member-s-us9902023",
          "w6-member-s-irs2023",
          "w4-fin-s-fs2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-e-services-category",
      "source": "icmec",
      "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
      "label": "reported transaction in services, membership or fundraising category with",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "US 2023 calendar-year return; individual transaction dates not disclosed",
      "sources": [
        "w6-member-s-us9902023",
        "w6-member-s-irs2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Schedule R Part V Australia row is type L, USD 868,571, method FMV; D/E loan categories are No. IRS measurement can use value provided or received, whichever higher. No inference of cash direction, loan, grant, specific service or donor/project allocation. Financial details: value: 868,571; currency: USD; kind: reported fair market value transaction amount; period: 2023 tax year",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-e-services-category",
        "source": "icmec",
        "target": "w3-icmec-australia",
        "label": "reported transaction in services, membership or fundraising category with",
        "detail": "Schedule R Part V Australia row is type L, USD 868,571, method FMV; D/E loan categories are No. IRS measurement can use value provided or received, whichever higher. No inference of cash direction, loan, grant, specific service or donor/project allocation.",
        "date": "US 2023 calendar-year return; individual transaction dates not disclosed",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "financial",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-member-s-us9902023",
          "w6-member-s-irs2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 868,571; currency: USD; kind: reported fair market value transaction amount; period: 2023 tax year"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-e-registration",
      "source": "w6-award-survey",
      "target": "w6-award-protocol",
      "label": "has a publicly recorded post-analysis registration",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Registered 10 November 2023; revision submitted6 December 2023.",
      "sources": [
        "w6-award-s-registration",
        "w6-award-s-revisions",
        "w6-award-s-schema",
        "w5-fund-s-childlight"
      ],
      "summary": "The linked registration states that analysis preceded registration; current details incorporate a December 2023 revision. This limits evidence of advance planning without establishing misconduct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-e-registration",
        "source": "w6-award-survey",
        "target": "w6-award-protocol",
        "label": "has a publicly recorded post-analysis registration",
        "detail": "The linked registration states that analysis preceded registration; current details incorporate a December 2023 revision. This limits evidence of advance planning without establishing misconduct.",
        "date": "Registered 10 November 2023; revision submitted6 December 2023.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-award-s-registration",
          "w6-award-s-revisions",
          "w6-award-s-schema",
          "w5-fund-s-childlight"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-e-recruitment",
      "source": "w6-award-cloudresearch",
      "target": "w6-award-survey",
      "label": "is reported to have recruited and administered participants",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Fieldwork November–December 2022; account published29 July 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w6-award-s-methods"
      ],
      "summary": "Authors report CloudResearch/PrimePanels recruitment and an expansion to UK/US samples after ethical and stakeholder approval at no extra cost. Exact cost baseline, approving individuals, fee and contracts are absent. No inference of free subsequent analyses or funder editorial approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-e-recruitment",
        "source": "w6-award-cloudresearch",
        "target": "w6-award-survey",
        "label": "is reported to have recruited and administered participants",
        "detail": "Authors report CloudResearch/PrimePanels recruitment and an expansion to UK/US samples after ethical and stakeholder approval at no extra cost. Exact cost baseline, approving individuals, fee and contracts are absent. No inference of free subsequent analyses or funder editorial approval.",
        "date": "Fieldwork November–December 2022; account published29 July 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-award-s-methods"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-e-reuse",
      "source": "w6-award-survey",
      "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
      "label": "supplies the survey data for a later financial-behaviour analysis",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Survey2022; Study C published2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w5-fund-s-childlight",
        "w6-award-s-methods",
        "w6-award-s-registration"
      ],
      "summary": "Study C reports a 4,918-person Australian/UK/US survey and links j7xh2 and HC220317, matching the methods paper. This is shared data ancestry, not an extra grant or proof that the 2021 award equals Study C costs.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-e-reuse",
        "source": "w6-award-survey",
        "target": "w5-fund-study2025",
        "label": "supplies the survey data for a later financial-behaviour analysis",
        "detail": "Study C reports a 4,918-person Australian/UK/US survey and links j7xh2 and HC220317, matching the methods paper. This is shared data ancestry, not an extra grant or proof that the 2021 award equals Study C costs.",
        "date": "Survey2022; Study C published2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight",
          "w6-award-s-methods",
          "w6-award-s-registration"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-e-deliverable",
      "source": "w5-enc-toolbox",
      "target": "w6-award-wp2",
      "label": "produced a publicly available work-package2 analytical report",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report dated 1 October 2024.",
      "sources": [
        "w6-award-s-wp2",
        "w6-award-s-gtr"
      ],
      "summary": "The dated report exposes a rationale, code and analyses; this scoped inspection checks its identity and declared work rather than validating the scientific results. UKRI identifies it as a 2024 outcome. Publication is distinct from funder acceptance or proof of contractual requirements.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-e-deliverable",
        "source": "w5-enc-toolbox",
        "target": "w6-award-wp2",
        "label": "produced a publicly available work-package2 analytical report",
        "detail": "The dated report exposes a rationale, code and analyses; this scoped inspection checks its identity and declared work rather than validating the scientific results. UKRI identifies it as a 2024 outcome. Publication is distinct from funder acceptance or proof of contractual requirements.",
        "date": "Report dated 1 October 2024.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-award-s-wp2",
          "w6-award-s-gtr"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-e-wp2-author",
      "source": "w5-enc-orben",
      "target": "w6-award-wp2",
      "label": "is a credited co-author of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report dated 1 October 2024.",
      "sources": [
        "w6-award-s-wp2"
      ],
      "summary": "Report credits Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben. This authorship does not allocate drafting or approval of the separate DFC WorkPackage3 report.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-e-wp2-author",
        "source": "w5-enc-orben",
        "target": "w6-award-wp2",
        "label": "is a credited co-author of",
        "detail": "Report credits Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben. This authorship does not allocate drafting or approval of the separate DFC WorkPackage3 report.",
        "date": "Report dated 1 October 2024.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-award-s-wp2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-reddit-gate",
      "source": "w7-impl-reddit",
      "target": "w7-impl-reddit-age",
      "label": "introduced an age check for UK NSFW access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "14 July 2025",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-penalty"
      ],
      "summary": "ICO notice records Reddit representations: Persona ID/facial checks introduced 14 July 2025, after the notice’s processing period. Not proof all current alternatives work in UK.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-reddit-gate",
        "source": "w7-impl-reddit",
        "target": "w7-impl-reddit-age",
        "label": "introduced an age check for UK NSFW access",
        "detail": "ICO notice records Reddit representations: Persona ID/facial checks introduced 14 July 2025, after the notice’s processing period. Not proof all current alternatives work in UK.",
        "date": "14 July 2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-penalty"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-processor",
      "source": "w7-impl-reddit-age",
      "target": "w7-impl-persona",
      "label": "uses a named verification processor",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "UK implementation14 July 2025; current FAQ read 9 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-penalty",
        "w7-impl-s-reddit",
        "w7-impl-s-persona"
      ],
      "summary": "Platform/provider identify Persona. FAQ places control of purposes and instructions with Reddit; executed schedule and payment terms unavailable.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-processor",
        "source": "w7-impl-reddit-age",
        "target": "w7-impl-persona",
        "label": "uses a named verification processor",
        "detail": "Platform/provider identify Persona. FAQ places control of purposes and instructions with Reddit; executed schedule and payment terms unavailable.",
        "date": "UK implementation14 July 2025; current FAQ read 9 September 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
            "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-penalty",
          "w7-impl-s-reddit",
          "w7-impl-s-persona"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-output",
      "source": "w7-impl-persona",
      "target": "w7-impl-reddit",
      "label": "says it returns birthdate or estimated age to",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current undated FAQ read 9 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-persona"
      ],
      "summary": "ID route returns birthdate; selfie route estimated age. FAQ promises personal data deletion within 3 days. Claimed outputs/deletion, not independently observed behaviour or universal binary token.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-output",
        "source": "w7-impl-persona",
        "target": "w7-impl-reddit",
        "label": "says it returns birthdate or estimated age to",
        "detail": "ID route returns birthdate; selfie route estimated age. FAQ promises personal data deletion within 3 days. Claimed outputs/deletion, not independently observed behaviour or universal binary token.",
        "date": "Current undated FAQ read 9 September 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-persona"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-penalty",
      "source": "w7-impl-ico",
      "target": "w7-impl-reddit",
      "label": "imposed an appealed UK GDPR penalty on",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "23 February 2026 decision;1 April 2026 appeal update",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-penalty",
        "w7-impl-s-appeal"
      ],
      "summary": "GBP 14,472,500 notice concerns processing from 25 May 2018 through 8 July 2025 and DPIA failures through 31 December 2024. Appeal recorded 1 April 2026; no payment or final tribunal outcome established. This is a data-protection penalty, not an OSA fine or direction to procure Persona. Financial details: value: 14,472,500; currency: GBP; kind: penalty imposed not payment; period: 23February2026 notice",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-penalty",
        "source": "w7-impl-ico",
        "target": "w7-impl-reddit",
        "label": "imposed an appealed UK GDPR penalty on",
        "detail": "GBP 14,472,500 notice concerns processing from 25 May 2018 through 8 July 2025 and DPIA failures through 31 December 2024. Appeal recorded 1 April 2026; no payment or final tribunal outcome established. This is a data-protection penalty, not an OSA fine or direction to procure Persona.",
        "date": "23 February 2026 decision;1 April 2026 appeal update",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-penalty",
          "w7-impl-s-appeal"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 14,472,500; currency: GBP; kind: penalty imposed not payment; period: 23February2026 notice"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-meetings",
      "source": "w7-impl-ico",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "reports regular inter-regulator meetings with",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FOI response24 March 2026; individual dates not obtained",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-foi"
      ],
      "summary": "ICO describes team-dependent fortnightly/quarterly meetings when refusing a broad records request. Does not attribute every meeting to Reddit or establish particular decision instructions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-meetings",
        "source": "w7-impl-ico",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "reports regular inter-regulator meetings with",
        "detail": "ICO describes team-dependent fortnightly/quarterly meetings when refusing a broad records request. Does not attribute every meeting to Reddit or establish particular decision instructions.",
        "date": "FOI response24 March 2026; individual dates not obtained",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-foi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-government-proposal",
      "source": "w7-impl-government",
      "target": "w7-impl-national-id",
      "label": "consulted on and later cancelled",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March 2026 consultation; July 2026 cancellation; September 2026 confirmation",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-consultation",
        "w7-impl-s-library",
        "w7-impl-s-minister"
      ],
      "summary": "Dated proposal and cancellation are separate events; minister confirms no final businesscase before cancellation. OneLogin/Wallet/privateDVS are not merged into this cancelledprogramme.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-government-proposal",
        "source": "w7-impl-government",
        "target": "w7-impl-national-id",
        "label": "consulted on and later cancelled",
        "detail": "Dated proposal and cancellation are separate events; minister confirms no final businesscase before cancellation. OneLogin/Wallet/privateDVS are not merged into this cancelledprogramme.",
        "date": "March 2026 consultation; July 2026 cancellation; September 2026 confirmation",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-consultation",
          "w7-impl-s-library",
          "w7-impl-s-minister"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-historical-age-use",
      "source": "w7-impl-national-id",
      "target": "w7-impl-age-use",
      "label": "included a non-exclusive online-age use proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March 2026 proposed use; programme cancelledJuly 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-consultation",
        "w7-impl-s-library"
      ],
      "summary": "Chapter4.1 proposed younger-teen online-age use while retaining alternative methods. Historical scope after national programme cancellation; no universal online-ID mandate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-historical-age-use",
        "source": "w7-impl-national-id",
        "target": "w7-impl-age-use",
        "label": "included a non-exclusive online-age use proposal",
        "detail": "Chapter4.1 proposed younger-teen online-age use while retaining alternative methods. Historical scope after national programme cancellation; no universal online-ID mandate.",
        "date": "March 2026 proposed use; programme cancelledJuly 2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
            "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-consultation",
          "w7-impl-s-library"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-e-discord-settings",
      "source": "discord",
      "target": "w7-impl-discord-settings",
      "label": "describes age checks for specified UK features",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "UK pageupdated28 July 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w7-impl-s-discord"
      ],
      "summary": "Content/settings gates include unblurring and MessageRequests changes. Opting out retains account/DMs/voice subject to restrictions. Platform documentation, not a finding that each setting is legally mandated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-e-discord-settings",
        "source": "discord",
        "target": "w7-impl-discord-settings",
        "label": "describes age checks for specified UK features",
        "detail": "Content/settings gates include unblurring and MessageRequests changes. Opting out retains account/DMs/voice subject to restrictions. Platform documentation, not a finding that each setting is legally mandated.",
        "date": "UK pageupdated28 July 2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
            "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-discord"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-authority",
      "source": "w7-policy-osa",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "requires age-assurance guidance and relevant code measures from",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Royal Assent 26 October 2023; relevant commencement and duty dates recorded separately.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "Section 82 requires guidance for section 81, including examples and compliance principles. Schedule 4 paragraph 12 links relevant children-code age measures to HEAA. The statute does not certify providers.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-authority",
        "source": "w7-policy-osa",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "requires age-assurance guidance and relevant code measures from",
        "detail": "Section 82 requires guidance for section 81, including examples and compliance principles. Schedule 4 paragraph 12 links relevant children-code age measures to HEAA. The statute does not certify providers.",
        "date": "Royal Assent 26 October 2023; relevant commencement and duty dates recorded separately.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-guidance",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
      "label": "publishes and applies",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "16 January 2025; Part 3 updated 24 April 2025; current page updated 2 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
        "w7-policy-s-part3",
        "w7-policy-s-part5",
        "w7-policy-s-current-page"
      ],
      "summary": "The January 2025 decision sets technical accuracy, robustness, reliability and fairness criteria, with final Part 3 and Part 5 guidance. The whole process must meet the criteria. Not all services must use age assurance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-guidance",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
        "label": "publishes and applies",
        "detail": "The January 2025 decision sets technical accuracy, robustness, reliability and fairness criteria, with final Part 3 and Part 5 guidance. The whole process must meet the criteria. Not all services must use age assurance.",
        "date": "16 January 2025; Part 3 updated 24 April 2025; current page updated 2 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
          "w7-policy-s-part3",
          "w7-policy-s-part5",
          "w7-policy-s-current-page"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-issued-code",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-child-code",
      "label": "issued",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Issued 4 July 2025; in force 25 July 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-child-code",
        "w7-policy-s-dates"
      ],
      "summary": "Issued 4 July 2025 and effective 25 July 2025. Children's risk assessments were due 24 July 2025; first access assessments were due 16 April 2025.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-issued-code",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-child-code",
        "label": "issued",
        "detail": "Issued 4 July 2025 and effective 25 July 2025. Children's risk assessments were due 24 July 2025; first access assessments were due 16 April 2025.",
        "date": "Issued 4 July 2025; in force 25 July 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-child-code",
          "w7-policy-s-dates"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-code-age",
      "source": "w7-policy-child-code",
      "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
      "label": "recommends for specified access and content controls",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "In force 25 July 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-child-code",
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "PCU B2 and B3 concern service-wide adult access; B4 to B7 concern conditional content or feed protections. B4 to B7 permit restrictions for users who do not seek adult access. Section 49 allows alternative compliant measures. The code does not mandate identification across the internet.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-code-age",
        "source": "w7-policy-child-code",
        "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
        "label": "recommends for specified access and content controls",
        "detail": "PCU B2 and B3 concern service-wide adult access; B4 to B7 concern conditional content or feed protections. B4 to B7 permit restrictions for users who do not seek adult access. Section 49 allows alternative compliant measures. The code does not mandate identification across the internet.",
        "date": "In force 25 July 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-child-code",
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-email-accepted",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
      "label": "added to methods capable of highly effective age assurance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Decision of 16 January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
        "w7-policy-s-part5"
      ],
      "summary": "Statement paragraphs 3.85 to 3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence; final Part 5 paragraph 4.17 includes the method. Capability depends on effective implementation. No approval of a named vendor or purchased service is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-email-accepted",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
        "label": "added to methods capable of highly effective age assurance",
        "detail": "Statement paragraphs 3.85 to 3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence; final Part 5 paragraph 4.17 includes the method. Capability depends on effective implementation. No approval of a named vendor or purchased service is inferred.",
        "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
          "w7-policy-s-part5"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-avpa-evidence",
      "source": "avpa",
      "target": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
      "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Evidence considered by 16 January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom expressly credits AVPA and VerifyMy evidence in adding email-based age estimation. The complete original submitted technical evidence remains not obtained; the regulator account supports attributed contribution without independently verifying performance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-avpa-evidence",
        "source": "avpa",
        "target": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
        "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
        "detail": "Ofcom expressly credits AVPA and VerifyMy evidence in adding email-based age estimation. The complete original submitted technical evidence remains not obtained; the regulator account supports attributed contribution without independently verifying performance.",
        "date": "Evidence considered by 16 January 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-thresholds-declined",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
      "label": "declined proposed fixed numerical thresholds in initial guidance for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Decision of 16 January 2025; currentness checked against the 2 September 2026 resource.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
        "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraphs 3.251 to 3.259 retain a criteria-based approach despite proposed 95% and 99% thresholds, citing inadequate comparable evidence and testing, and innovation considerations. Future thresholds remain possible; the September 2026 resource does not itself impose one.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-thresholds-declined",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
        "label": "declined proposed fixed numerical thresholds in initial guidance for",
        "detail": "Paragraphs 3.251 to 3.259 retain a criteria-based approach despite proposed 95% and 99% thresholds, citing inadequate comparable evidence and testing, and innovation considerations. Future thresholds remain possible; the September 2026 resource does not itself impose one.",
        "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025; currentness checked against the 2 September 2026 resource.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
          "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-certification-conditional",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
      "label": "allows certification as evidence without making it mandatory or sufficient for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Decision of 16 January 2025; FOI response of 26 August 2025; resource of 2 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
        "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor",
        "w7-policy-s-foi2053425"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraphs 3.350 to 3.353 decline the request from Yoti for mandatory independent certification. Providers can use their own, vendor or independent tests as evidence. Trust framework certification does not automatically establish compliance. The September 2026 vendor resource maintains this distinction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-certification-conditional",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-heaa",
        "label": "allows certification as evidence without making it mandatory or sufficient for",
        "detail": "Paragraphs 3.350 to 3.353 decline the request from Yoti for mandatory independent certification. Providers can use their own, vendor or independent tests as evidence. Trust framework certification does not automatically establish compliance. The September 2026 vendor resource maintains this distinction.",
        "date": "Decision of 16 January 2025; FOI response of 26 August 2025; resource of 2 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
          "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor",
          "w7-policy-s-foi2053425"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-age-fine",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-xgroovy",
      "label": "reports imposing an age-assurance duty penalty on",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Decision issued 3 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-xgroovy"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom reports issuing a confirmation decision on 3 September 2026 and announced it on 4 September, concerning a section 12 breach. The underlying non-confidential decision has not yet been published. The reported penalty is not evidence of payment or a court judgment. Financial details: value: 700,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported imposed regulatory penalty; period: Confirmation decision issued 3 September 2026.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-age-fine",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-xgroovy",
        "label": "reports imposing an age-assurance duty penalty on",
        "detail": "Ofcom reports issuing a confirmation decision on 3 September 2026 and announced it on 4 September, concerning a section 12 breach. The underlying non-confidential decision has not yet been published. The reported penalty is not evidence of payment or a court judgment.",
        "date": "Decision issued 3 September 2026.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "financial",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-xgroovy"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 700,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported imposed regulatory penalty; period: Confirmation decision issued 3 September 2026."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-information-fine",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-policy-xgroovy",
      "label": "reports imposing a separate information-request penalty on",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Decision issued 3 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-xgroovy"
      ],
      "summary": "The reported section 102(8)(a) penalty concerns failure to respond. It is separate from the GBP 700,000 age-assurance fine. The conditional GBP 200 daily penalty is not added to this fixed amount; collection has not been observed. Financial details: value: 30,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported imposed regulatory penalty; period: Confirmation decision issued 3 September 2026.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-information-fine",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-policy-xgroovy",
        "label": "reports imposing a separate information-request penalty on",
        "detail": "The reported section 102(8)(a) penalty concerns failure to respond. It is separate from the GBP 700,000 age-assurance fine. The conditional GBP 200 daily penalty is not added to this fixed amount; collection has not been observed.",
        "date": "Decision issued 3 September 2026.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "financial",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-xgroovy"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 30,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported imposed regulatory penalty; period: Confirmation decision issued 3 September 2026."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-allen-avid",
      "source": "w7-market-allen",
      "target": "w7-market-avid",
      "label": "holds disclosed majority share/voting band and director appointment rights in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notified12 May 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-avid-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Current PSC register: more than50% but less than75% shares/votes; right to appoint/remove directors. Not exact stake or evidence of personal involvement in a named certification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-allen-avid",
        "source": "w7-market-allen",
        "target": "w7-market-avid",
        "label": "holds disclosed majority share/voting band and director appointment rights in",
        "detail": "Current PSC register: more than50% but less than75% shares/votes; right to appoint/remove directors. Not exact stake or evidence of personal involvement in a named certification.",
        "date": "Notified12 May 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-avid-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-bate-avid",
      "source": "w7-market-bate",
      "target": "w7-market-avid",
      "label": "holds disclosed minority share and voting band in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notified14 July 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-avid-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "More than25% but no more than50%. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry not treated as an independent person or a concluded transfer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-bate-avid",
        "source": "w7-market-bate",
        "target": "w7-market-avid",
        "label": "holds disclosed minority share and voting band in",
        "detail": "More than25% but no more than50%. Historical ceased Nick Bate entry not treated as an independent person or a concluded transfer.",
        "date": "Notified14 July 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-avid-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-control",
      "source": "w7-market-avid",
      "target": "w7-market-scheme",
      "label": "holds director appointment/removal rights in",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "AVID notified1 June 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-scheme-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Corporate PSC record puts AVID's director appointment/removal rights over the scheme company. Does not establish case-specific certificate direction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-control",
        "source": "w7-market-avid",
        "target": "w7-market-scheme",
        "label": "holds director appointment/removal rights in",
        "detail": "Corporate PSC record puts AVID's director appointment/removal rights over the scheme company. Does not establish case-specific certificate direction.",
        "date": "AVID notified1 June 2023; current register inspected9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-scheme-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-sla",
      "source": "w7-market-avid",
      "target": "w7-market-scheme",
      "label": "supplies audit, certification and test purchasing services under a stated SLA to",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current undated legal footer captured9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-governance"
      ],
      "summary": "Official website identifies separate provider and nonprofit scheme. Executed SLA payment, indemnity, renewal and termination terms remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-avid-scheme-sla",
        "source": "w7-market-avid",
        "target": "w7-market-scheme",
        "label": "supplies audit, certification and test purchasing services under a stated SLA to",
        "detail": "Official website identifies separate provider and nonprofit scheme. Executed SLA payment, indemnity, renewal and termination terms remain not obtained.",
        "date": "Current undated legal footer captured9 September 2026.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-governance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-scheme-rules",
      "source": "w7-market-scheme",
      "target": "w7-market-avid",
      "label": "sets published certification decision, fee, appeal and impartiality rules for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Downloaded2026 rules; no historical applicability assumed.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-rules",
        "w7-market-s-governance"
      ],
      "summary": "2026 rules keep decisions inside assessment body but separate from evaluator; annual fee review/28day invoices; nonpayment can trigger certification action. Independent appeals and impartiality controls, including no designing certified services and two-year prior-client decision restriction, qualify this discretion. Rules are not an audit of actual compliance or a retrospective2024 instrument.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-scheme-rules",
        "source": "w7-market-scheme",
        "target": "w7-market-avid",
        "label": "sets published certification decision, fee, appeal and impartiality rules for",
        "detail": "2026 rules keep decisions inside assessment body but separate from evaluator; annual fee review/28day invoices; nonpayment can trigger certification action. Independent appeals and impartiality controls, including no designing certified services and two-year prior-client decision restriction, qualify this discretion. Rules are not an audit of actual compliance or a retrospective2024 instrument.",
        "date": "Downloaded2026 rules; no historical applicability assumed.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-rules",
          "w7-market-s-governance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-allen-iso",
      "source": "w7-market-allen",
      "target": "w7-market-iso27566",
      "label": "is listed by BSI as lead editor of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "BSI event23 October 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-bsi-roles"
      ],
      "summary": "BSI identifies a commercial certification executive as standard lead editor. Role is not sole authorship, unilateral approval or statutory supplier selection.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-allen-iso",
        "source": "w7-market-allen",
        "target": "w7-market-iso27566",
        "label": "is listed by BSI as lead editor of",
        "detail": "BSI identifies a commercial certification executive as standard lead editor. Role is not sole authorship, unilateral approval or statutory supplier selection.",
        "date": "BSI event23 October 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-bsi-roles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-allen-panel",
      "source": "w7-market-allen",
      "target": "w7-market-bsi-panel",
      "label": "is listed by BSI as chair of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "BSI event23 October 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-bsi-roles"
      ],
      "summary": "BSI biography identifies national age-assurance panel chair; meeting decisions and particular votes not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-allen-panel",
        "source": "w7-market-allen",
        "target": "w7-market-bsi-panel",
        "label": "is listed by BSI as chair of",
        "detail": "BSI biography identifies national age-assurance panel chair; meeting decisions and particular votes not obtained.",
        "date": "BSI event23 October 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
            "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-bsi-roles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-panel-iso",
      "source": "w7-market-bsi-panel",
      "target": "w7-market-iso27566",
      "label": "coordinated UK input into development of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "BSI3 February 2026 release announcement.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-bsi-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "BSI describes national-panel input into JTC1/SC27WG5 and collaboration across regulators, industry and civil society. No claim every proposed provision was adopted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-panel-iso",
        "source": "w7-market-bsi-panel",
        "target": "w7-market-iso27566",
        "label": "coordinated UK input into development of",
        "detail": "BSI describes national-panel input into JTC1/SC27WG5 and collaboration across regulators, industry and civil society. No claim every proposed provision was adopted.",
        "date": "BSI3 February 2026 release announcement.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
            "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-bsi-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-avid-iso-service",
      "source": "w7-market-avid",
      "target": "w7-market-iso27566",
      "label": "offers paid certification services incorporating",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current service page captured9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-iso-service",
        "w7-market-s-governance"
      ],
      "summary": "Commercial service offering identified with legal AVID provider footer. Certification fees are principal income; no actual customer payment or regulator exclusivity established. Ofcom's actual certification position belongs to policy lane.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-avid-iso-service",
        "source": "w7-market-avid",
        "target": "w7-market-iso27566",
        "label": "offers paid certification services incorporating",
        "detail": "Commercial service offering identified with legal AVID provider footer. Certification fees are principal income; no actual customer payment or regulator exclusivity established. Ofcom's actual certification position belongs to policy lane.",
        "date": "Current service page captured9 September 2026.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-iso-service",
          "w7-market-s-governance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-verifymy-cert",
      "source": "w7-market-verifymy",
      "target": "w7-market-scheme",
      "label": "reports its platform has certification incorporating ISO27566-1 from",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current product page captured9 September 2026; not backdated to January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-verifymy"
      ],
      "summary": "Provider says ACCS1:2025 technical requirements incorporate ISO27566-1, classifying its email and face methods highly effective. Actual certificate, independent method evaluation and fee are not obtained; not Ofcom product endorsement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-verifymy-cert",
        "source": "w7-market-verifymy",
        "target": "w7-market-scheme",
        "label": "reports its platform has certification incorporating ISO27566-1 from",
        "detail": "Provider says ACCS1:2025 technical requirements incorporate ISO27566-1, classifying its email and face methods highly effective. Actual certificate, independent method evaluation and fee are not obtained; not Ofcom product endorsement.",
        "date": "Current product page captured9 September 2026; not backdated to January 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-verifymy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-safe-phase2",
      "source": "w7-market-safeonline",
      "target": "euconsent",
      "label": "is acknowledged as funding Phase II delivered by the later ASBL",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Acknowledged5 August 2024 and9 January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
      ],
      "summary": "Cover/section1.9 and recipient project update acknowledge Safe Online funding for euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware, establishing reported project-level purpose. Executed amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain not obtained. Original2021 EC consortium grant is separate and not assigned to later ASBL.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-safe-phase2",
        "source": "w7-market-safeonline",
        "target": "euconsent",
        "label": "is acknowledged as funding Phase II delivered by the later ASBL",
        "detail": "Cover/section1.9 and recipient project update acknowledge Safe Online funding for euCONSENT Phase II/AgeAware, establishing reported project-level purpose. Executed amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain not obtained. Original2021 EC consortium grant is separate and not assigned to later ASBL.",
        "date": "Acknowledged5 August 2024 and9 January 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "finance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-euconsent-ageaware",
      "source": "euconsent",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "published a proposed admission, billing and governance design for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Consultation5 August 2024; final approval/implementation not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
      ],
      "summary": "Version1.0 consultation locates admission criteria, fit-and-proper review, licensing, tally access and participant suspension in ASBL-governed ecosystem. Includes negotiated core-component exclusivity and proposed three-year commercial-scheme exclusivity, then contestability. This is a published proposal, not an executed concession or current compulsory gate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-euconsent-ageaware",
        "source": "euconsent",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "published a proposed admission, billing and governance design for",
        "detail": "Version1.0 consultation locates admission criteria, fit-and-proper review, licensing, tally access and participant suspension in ASBL-governed ecosystem. Includes negotiated core-component exclusivity and proposed three-year commercial-scheme exclusivity, then contestability. This is a published proposal, not an executed concession or current compulsory gate.",
        "date": "Consultation5 August 2024; final approval/implementation not obtained.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-corby-ageaware",
      "source": "corby",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "is a credited author of the proposed specification for",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Version1.0,5 August 2024.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
      ],
      "summary": "Cover names Iain Corby, Alastair Graham and Ben Gower; Corby document author. No sole authorship or completed approval inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-corby-ageaware",
        "source": "corby",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "is a credited author of the proposed specification for",
        "detail": "Cover names Iain Corby, Alastair Graham and Ben Gower; Corby document author. No sole authorship or completed approval inferred.",
        "date": "Version1.0,5 August 2024.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "authorship",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-allen-ageaware",
      "source": "w7-market-allen",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "is named as the required ACCS approver for the draft specification of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Draft5 August 2024; rules2026 must not be applied retrospectively without support.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
        "w7-market-s-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Document-control table identifies T Allen, ACCS Programme Director, with Approver in the Action column; completion Date is blank and no signed approval is shown. This is proposed approval authority, not a completed decision. It raises a bounded conflict-management question beside later2026 certification design restrictions; not a demonstrated breach.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-allen-ageaware",
        "source": "w7-market-allen",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "is named as the required ACCS approver for the draft specification of",
        "detail": "Document-control table identifies T Allen, ACCS Programme Director, with Approver in the Action column; completion Date is blank and no signed approval is shown. This is proposed approval authority, not a completed decision. It raises a bounded conflict-management question beside later2026 certification design restrictions; not a demonstrated breach.",
        "date": "Draft5 August 2024; rules2026 must not be applied retrospectively without support.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
            "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
          "w7-market-s-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-verifymy-ageaware",
      "source": "w7-market-verifymy",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
      ],
      "summary": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-verifymy-ageaware",
        "source": "w7-market-verifymy",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
        "detail": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
        "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-yoti-ageaware",
      "source": "w7-market-yoti",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
      ],
      "summary": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-yoti-ageaware",
        "source": "w7-market-yoti",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
        "detail": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
        "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-agechecked-ageaware",
      "source": "w7-market-agechecked",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
      ],
      "summary": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-agechecked-ageaware",
        "source": "w7-market-agechecked",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "is credited with detailed design work for",
        "detail": "January 2025 project account identifies provider as ASBL member from original project team helping design proof of concept. Draft2024 reviewer listing is a separate proposed-role record. No compensation, exclusive award, veto or customer deployment shown.",
        "date": "Recipient account9 January 2025, following5 August 2024 draft.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          },
          {
            "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-e-avpa-ageaware",
      "source": "avpa",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "describes the project's demonstration mission as fulfilled alongside private alternatives",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated current page captured9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-avpa-project"
      ],
      "summary": "Current AVPA retrospective says ASBL technology development continued until2025 and points to private-sector alternative ecosystems. Does not establish company dissolution or exact service termination, but limits depicting the2024 design as a current mandatory network.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-e-avpa-ageaware",
        "source": "avpa",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "describes the project's demonstration mission as fulfilled alongside private alternatives",
        "detail": "Current AVPA retrospective says ASBL technology development continued until2025 and points to private-sector alternative ecosystems. Does not establish company dissolution or exact service termination, but limits depicting the2024 design as a current mandatory network.",
        "date": "Undated current page captured9 September 2026.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
            "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-avpa-project"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-chair",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "declared chair role in debate",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Declaration 6 July 2023; not an open-ended tenure finding.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-hansard0706"
      ],
      "summary": "At the new Report stage Kidron declared that she chaired 5Rights Foundation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-chair",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "declared chair role in debate",
        "detail": "At the new Report stage Kidron declared that she chaired 5Rights Foundation.",
        "date": "Declaration 6 July 2023; not an open-ended tenure finding.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "Hansard 6 July 2023, readerL1600.",
        "mechanism": "A contemporaneously declared NGO/parliamentary role bridge; does not establish donor instructions.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0706"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-credit",
      "source": "w7-adv-parkinson",
      "target": "kidron",
      "label": "credited work on age-assurance principles",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "6 July 2023.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-hansard0706"
      ],
      "summary": "Parkinson specifically credited Kidron's work relating to Amendment 124 and thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for continued collaboration over preceding months.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-credit",
        "source": "w7-adv-parkinson",
        "target": "kidron",
        "label": "credited work on age-assurance principles",
        "detail": "Parkinson specifically credited Kidron's work relating to Amendment 124 and thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for continued collaboration over preceding months.",
        "date": "6 July 2023.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Hansard 6 July 2023, readerL4422 andL4436.",
        "mechanism": "Ministerial attribution supports actual contribution to a government package; not sole authorship or exact accepted-redline provenance.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0706"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-cosponsor",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "w7-adv-amend124",
      "label": "co-sponsored",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2023 Report-stage amendment.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-amend124"
      ],
      "summary": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Amendment 124; Parkinson was lead member and Clement-Jones also sponsored it.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-cosponsor",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "w7-adv-amend124",
        "label": "co-sponsored",
        "detail": "Parliament lists Kidron as a sponsor of Amendment 124; Parkinson was lead member and Clement-Jones also sponsored it.",
        "date": "July 2023 Report-stage amendment.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Official amendment page, Lead member and Sponsors; readerL6, L64–74.",
        "mechanism": "Formal sponsorship of a specific age-assurance legislative text.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-amend124"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-agreed",
      "source": "ukparliament",
      "target": "w7-adv-amend124",
      "label": "agreed amendment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "10 July 2023.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-amend124",
        "w7-adv-s-hansard0710"
      ],
      "summary": "The Lords agreed Amendment 124 on 10 July 2023. It set age-assurance principles for Ofcom, including proportionate effectiveness, age ranges, AADC standards and interoperability.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-agreed",
        "source": "ukparliament",
        "target": "w7-adv-amend124",
        "label": "agreed amendment",
        "detail": "The Lords agreed Amendment 124 on 10 July 2023. It set age-assurance principles for Ofcom, including proportionate effectiveness, age ranges, AADC standards and interoperability.",
        "date": "10 July 2023.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Hansard 10 July 2023 whole-chamber readerL4267–4293; official amendment text11A.",
        "mechanism": "An actual legislative decision; technical standards may be referred to but no particular certifier is mandated here.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-amend124",
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0710"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-privacy-amend",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "w7-adv-amend125",
      "label": "tabled privacy addition",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July 2023; spoken to 10 July 2023.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-amend125",
        "w7-adv-s-hansard0710"
      ],
      "summary": "Kidron proposed purpose restrictions and deletion/secure-storage wording through Amendment 125 to Amendment 124.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-privacy-amend",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "w7-adv-amend125",
        "label": "tabled privacy addition",
        "detail": "Kidron proposed purpose restrictions and deletion/secure-storage wording through Amendment 125 to Amendment 124.",
        "date": "July 2023; spoken to 10 July 2023.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Official Amendment 125 text; Hansard 10 July 2023 readerL136–140.",
        "mechanism": "A concrete proposed edit, not merely public campaign alignment.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-amend125",
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0710"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-declined-amend",
      "source": "w7-adv-parkinson",
      "target": "w7-adv-amend125",
      "label": "declined proposed privacy addition",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "10 July 2023.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-hansard0710",
        "w7-adv-s-amend125"
      ],
      "summary": "Minister declined Amendments 125/217, citing existing privacy/data-protection safeguards and concern about legal confusion. Amendment 125 was not moved, so no House vote rejecting it is claimed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-declined-amend",
        "source": "w7-adv-parkinson",
        "target": "w7-adv-amend125",
        "label": "declined proposed privacy addition",
        "detail": "Minister declined Amendments 125/217, citing existing privacy/data-protection safeguards and concern about legal confusion. Amendment 125 was not moved, so no House vote rejecting it is claimed.",
        "date": "10 July 2023.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Hansard 10 July 2023 readerL342–371, L405; whole-chamberL4291; official125 decision.",
        "mechanism": "Shows a boundary to the contributor's requested wording, alongside acceptance of the broader package.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0710",
          "w7-adv-s-amend125"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-proposed-privacy",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
      "label": "requested express privacy criterion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document labelled March 2024; exact submission day not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5"
      ],
      "summary": "5Rights asked for privacy-preserving assurance as a criterion, with minimal data collection, limited retention and security; its proposed on-device/result-only approach sought to avoid a central identity database linked to online activity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-proposed-privacy",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
        "label": "requested express privacy criterion",
        "detail": "5Rights asked for privacy-preserving assurance as a criterion, with minimal data collection, limited retention and security; its proposed on-device/result-only approach sought to avoid a central identity database linked to online activity.",
        "date": "Document labelled March 2024; exact submission day not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "March 2024 response, PDF 1–2 and PDF 5–7, especially PDF 6Q4 and PDF 7.",
        "mechanism": "An NGO proposal for assurance design and limits; does not support an undifferentiated universal-identity-demand claim.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-declined-privacy",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
      "label": "declined separate criterion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January 2025 statement.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5",
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom named 5Rights' request then declined adding a separate privacy criterion because data-protection requirements already apply. It also clarified design/minimisation guidance and said both regimes are mandatory.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-declined-privacy",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-adv-privacy-criterion-proposal",
        "label": "declined separate criterion",
        "detail": "Ofcom named 5Rights' request then declined adding a separate privacy criterion because data-protection requirements already apply. It also clarified design/minimisation guidance and said both regimes are mandatory.",
        "date": "January 2025 statement.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "January 2025 statement3.277–3.278 PDF 62; 3.288 PDF 64; 3.289–3.290 PDF 65 (printed pages same).",
        "mechanism": "Counterpart disposition of a specific NGO submission; guidance clarification is not assigned solely to 5Rights.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5",
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-proposed-token",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "w7-adv-token-proposal",
      "label": "recommended age tokens in broader assurance ecosystem",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document 17 July 2024.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024"
      ],
      "summary": "5Rights argued for age ranges and a broader ecosystem, including privacy-preserving age tokens, for age-appropriate experiences. Its criticism of the draft as binary is the respondent's characterization.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-proposed-token",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "w7-adv-token-proposal",
        "label": "recommended age tokens in broader assurance ecosystem",
        "detail": "5Rights argued for age ranges and a broader ecosystem, including privacy-preserving age tokens, for age-appropriate experiences. Its criticism of the draft as binary is the respondent's characterization.",
        "date": "Document 17 July 2024.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "17 July 2024 response, PDF 12–14/printed11–13; token text PDF 14/printed13.",
        "mechanism": "Pressure extended beyond an over18 gate toward age-appropriate design; not all such assurance was proposed to require government ID.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-tokens-disposition",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w7-adv-token-proposal",
      "label": "added conditional references after token submissions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January 2025 statement.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024",
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom recorded token submissions from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT and added references in guidance.A token is not itself an assurance method: underlying age check and sharing must satisfy HEAA, and the regulated service retains responsibility.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-tokens-disposition",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w7-adv-token-proposal",
        "label": "added conditional references after token submissions",
        "detail": "Ofcom recorded token submissions from 5Rights, Yoti and ACT and added references in guidance.A token is not itself an assurance method: underlying age check and sharing must satisfy HEAA, and the regulated service retains responsibility.",
        "date": "January 2025 statement.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "January 2025 statement 3.66–3.68 PDF 24, footnote 94 explicitly cites 5Rights' response to the May 2024 consultation p.14 (the response is dated 17 July 2024), alongside Yoti December 2023 and ACT May 2024 responses; disposition 3.103–3.105 PDF 30–31.",
        "mechanism": "A concrete clarification following submissions; not exclusive attribution to 5Rights or blanket acceptance of token systems.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024",
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-certification",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "w7-adv-certification-proposal",
      "label": "urged standards and certification consideration",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document labelled October 2025; exact submission day not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025"
      ],
      "summary": "5Rights recommended numerical thresholds tied to risk/age ranges and urged Ofcom to consider certification to help services choose age-assurance partners, citing IEEE 2089.1–2024 and ACCS.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-certification",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "w7-adv-certification-proposal",
        "label": "urged standards and certification consideration",
        "detail": "5Rights recommended numerical thresholds tied to risk/age ranges and urged Ofcom to consider certification to help services choose age-assurance partners, citing IEEE 2089.1–2024 and ACCS.",
        "date": "Document labelled October 2025; exact submission day not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "October 2025 response, PDF 13–15, especially PDF 14/printed14.",
        "mechanism": "NGO advocacy can channel implementation toward standards/testing infrastructure; this record does not show subsequent adoption, fees or an instruction from funders.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-accs-citation",
      "source": "w7-adv-certification-proposal",
      "target": "accs",
      "label": "cited technical requirements as certification example",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document labelled October 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025"
      ],
      "summary": "The 5Rights response cited ACCS's 2021 Technical Requirements for Age Check Systems while recommending Ofcom consider certification. It also cited certification against a 5Rights-led standard.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-accs-citation",
        "source": "w7-adv-certification-proposal",
        "target": "accs",
        "label": "cited technical requirements as certification example",
        "detail": "The 5Rights response cited ACCS's 2021 Technical Requirements for Age Check Systems while recommending Ofcom consider certification. It also cited certification against a 5Rights-led standard.",
        "date": "Document labelled October 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "October 2025 response, PDF 14/printed14, paragraph beginning'Ofcom should explore certification' andfootnotes79–80.",
        "mechanism": "An explicit standards/certification reference; not a procurement or financial relationship between 5Rights and ACCS.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-commission",
      "source": "euconsent",
      "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "label": "reported commissioning",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
      ],
      "summary": "euCONSENT's project update reported commissioning a review of AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact through team academics. The article identifies the later ASBL project context; the contracting legal instrument, fee, clearance terms and completion are unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-commission",
        "source": "euconsent",
        "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
        "label": "reported commissioning",
        "detail": "euCONSENT's project update reported commissioning a review of AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact through team academics. The article identifies the later ASBL project context; the contracting legal instrument, fee, clearance terms and completion are unknown.",
        "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "euCONSENT, Building a Safer Internet: The Journey to AgeAware, 9 January 2025, paragraph beginning 'We have also commissioned'; captured text line71.",
        "mechanism": "Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-review-day",
      "source": "w5-enc-day",
      "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
      ],
      "summary": "The project update named Emma Day, alongside Sabine Witting, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-review-day",
        "source": "w5-enc-day",
        "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
        "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
        "detail": "The project update named Emma Day, alongside Sabine Witting, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
        "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "euCONSENT, Building a Safer Internet: The Journey to AgeAware, 9 January 2025, paragraph beginning 'We have also commissioned'; captured text line71.",
        "mechanism": "Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-review-witting",
      "source": "w5-enc-witting",
      "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
      ],
      "summary": "The project update named Sabine Witting, alongside Emma Day, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-review-witting",
        "source": "w5-enc-witting",
        "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
        "label": "was named as intended review co-lead",
        "detail": "The project update named Sabine Witting, alongside Emma Day, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.",
        "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "euCONSENT, Building a Safer Internet: The Journey to AgeAware, 9 January 2025, paragraph beginning 'We have also commissioned'; captured text line71.",
        "mechanism": "Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-review-livingstone",
      "source": "w5-enc-livingstone",
      "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "label": "was named among team academics through whom review was commissioned",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
      ],
      "summary": "The project account said the review was commissioned through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair. This identifies an attributed commissioning route, not three personally executed contracts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-review-livingstone",
        "source": "w5-enc-livingstone",
        "target": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
        "label": "was named among team academics through whom review was commissioned",
        "detail": "The project account said the review was commissioned through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair. This identifies an attributed commissioning route, not three personally executed contracts.",
        "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "euCONSENT, Building a Safer Internet: The Journey to AgeAware, 9 January 2025, paragraph beginning 'We have also commissioned'; captured text line71.",
        "mechanism": "Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-e-review-scope",
      "source": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
      "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
      "label": "was commissioned to examine rights implications of",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
      ],
      "summary": "The proposed review's stated subject was AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact. The participant called it independent; no independence or completion audit was performed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-e-review-scope",
        "source": "w7-adv-ageaware-rights-review",
        "target": "w7-market-ageaware",
        "label": "was commissioned to examine rights implications of",
        "detail": "The proposed review's stated subject was AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact. The participant called it independent; no independence or completion audit was performed.",
        "date": "Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "euCONSENT, Building a Safer Internet: The Journey to AgeAware, 9 January 2025, paragraph beginning 'We have also commissioned'; captured text line71.",
        "mechanism": "Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-e-verifymy-evidence",
      "source": "w7-market-verifymy",
      "target": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
      "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "16 January 2025 statement; current provider identity separately read 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
        "w7-market-s-verifymy"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom paragraphs 3.85–3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence when adding email-based estimation. This connects the named provider to a method-level decision; it does not endorse a vendor, establish performance in a particular deployment, or identify Reddit’s unnamed email supplier.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-e-verifymy-evidence",
        "source": "w7-market-verifymy",
        "target": "w7-policy-email-estimation",
        "label": "supplied evidence expressly relied upon in method acceptance",
        "detail": "Ofcom paragraphs 3.85–3.87 explicitly credit AVPA and VerifyMy evidence when adding email-based estimation. This connects the named provider to a method-level decision; it does not endorse a vendor, establish performance in a particular deployment, or identify Reddit’s unnamed email supplier.",
        "date": "16 January 2025 statement; current provider identity separately read 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
            "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
          "w7-market-s-verifymy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-organizer-cesia",
      "source": "w8-red-cesia",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22 September 2025 launch",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-launch"
      ],
      "summary": "named campaign co-organizer",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-organizer-cesia",
        "source": "w8-red-cesia",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
        "detail": "named campaign co-organizer",
        "date": "22 September 2025 launch",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-launch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-organizer-tfs",
      "source": "w8-red-tfs",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22 September 2025 launch",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-launch"
      ],
      "summary": "named campaign co-organizer",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-organizer-tfs",
        "source": "w8-red-tfs",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
        "detail": "named campaign co-organizer",
        "date": "22 September 2025 launch",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-launch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-organizer-chai",
      "source": "w8-red-chai",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22 September 2025 launch",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-launch"
      ],
      "summary": "named campaign co-organizer",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-organizer-chai",
        "source": "w8-red-chai",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "named campaign co-organizer",
        "detail": "named campaign co-organizer",
        "date": "22 September 2025 launch",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call launch press release",
            "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-launch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-segerie",
      "source": "w8-red-segerie",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with initial drafting",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with initial drafting",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-segerie",
        "source": "w8-red-segerie",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with initial drafting",
        "detail": "credited with initial drafting",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-niki",
      "source": "w8-red-iliadis",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with TFS project management",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with TFS project management",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-niki",
        "source": "w8-red-iliadis",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with TFS project management",
        "detail": "credited with TFS project management",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-tereza",
      "source": "w8-red-zoumpalova",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with TFS management and signatory work",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with TFS management and signatory work",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-tereza",
        "source": "w8-red-zoumpalova",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with TFS management and signatory work",
        "detail": "credited with TFS management and signatory work",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-anoush",
      "source": "w8-red-tatevossian",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with UN-engagement advice",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with UN-engagement advice",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-anoush",
        "source": "w8-red-tatevossian",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with UN-engagement advice",
        "detail": "credited with UN-engagement advice",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-grimonpont",
      "source": "w8-red-grimonpont",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with press-conference coordination",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with press-conference coordination",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-grimonpont",
        "source": "w8-red-grimonpont",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with press-conference coordination",
        "detail": "credited with press-conference coordination",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-shimi",
      "source": "w8-red-shimi",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with drafting feedback",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with drafting feedback",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-shimi",
        "source": "w8-red-shimi",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with drafting feedback",
        "detail": "credited with drafting feedback",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-miotti",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with drafting feedback",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with drafting feedback",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-miotti",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with drafting feedback",
        "detail": "credited with drafting feedback",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-controlai",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with partner feedback",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with partner feedback",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-controlai",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with partner feedback",
        "detail": "credited with partner feedback",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-fli",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with partner feedback",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with partner feedback",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-fli",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with partner feedback",
        "detail": "credited with partner feedback",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-work-apollo",
      "source": "w8-red-apollo-pr",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "credited with press-conference preparation and moderation",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with press-conference preparation and moderation",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-work-apollo",
        "source": "w8-red-apollo-pr",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "credited with press-conference preparation and moderation",
        "detail": "credited with press-conference preparation and moderation",
        "date": "Retrospective undated organizer credits; launch September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ressa-approach",
      "source": "w8-red-grimonpont",
      "target": "w8-red-ressa",
      "label": "credited with pitching the campaign",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before September2025 announcement; exact date unreported",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack"
      ],
      "summary": "credited with pitching the campaign",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ressa-approach",
        "source": "w8-red-grimonpont",
        "target": "w8-red-ressa",
        "label": "credited with pitching the campaign",
        "detail": "credited with pitching the campaign",
        "date": "Before September2025 announcement; exact date unreported",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-signature-hubinger",
      "source": "w8-red-hubinger",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "listed individual signatory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-signatories"
      ],
      "summary": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-signature-hubinger",
        "source": "w8-red-hubinger",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "listed individual signatory",
        "detail": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
        "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-signatories"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-signature-kidron",
      "source": "kidron",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "listed individual signatory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-signatories"
      ],
      "summary": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-signature-kidron",
        "source": "kidron",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "listed individual signatory",
        "detail": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
        "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-signatories"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-signature-miotti",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "listed individual signatory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-signatories"
      ],
      "summary": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-signature-miotti",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "listed individual signatory",
        "detail": "Roster records support for the Global Call; does not establish agreement with a partner's fuller regime.",
        "date": "Roster observed 9 September2026; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-signatories"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w8-red-narrow-path",
      "label": "promotes ASI prohibition as red-lines implementation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "25 September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-controlai"
      ],
      "summary": "ControlAI explicitly acknowledges unspecified red lines in the general call, then promotes its own prohibition and A Narrow Path. Does not bind other signatories.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "w8-red-narrow-path",
        "label": "promotes ASI prohibition as red-lines implementation",
        "detail": "ControlAI explicitly acknowledges unspecified red lines in the general call, then promotes its own prohibition and A Narrow Path. Does not bind other signatories.",
        "date": "25 September2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-controlai"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ctrl-partner",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "self-identifies as official partner",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "25 September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-controlai"
      ],
      "summary": "self-identifies as official partner",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ctrl-partner",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "self-identifies as official partner",
        "detail": "self-identifies as official partner",
        "date": "25 September2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-controlai"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-survey-tfs",
      "source": "w8-red-tfs",
      "target": "w8-red-survey",
      "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February2025 survey; April2report",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-survey"
      ],
      "summary": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-survey-tfs",
        "source": "w8-red-tfs",
        "target": "w8-red-survey",
        "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
        "detail": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
        "date": "February2025 survey; April2report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-survey"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-survey-renaissance",
      "source": "w8-red-renaissance",
      "target": "w8-red-survey",
      "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February2025 survey; April2report",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-survey"
      ],
      "summary": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-survey-renaissance",
        "source": "w8-red-renaissance",
        "target": "w8-red-survey",
        "label": "consolidated fifteen priorities into ten survey options",
        "detail": "Methodology identifies agenda curation before44anonymous respondents ranked options; no representative global-mandate inference.",
        "date": "February2025 survey; April2report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-survey"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-survey-reference",
      "source": "w8-red-survey",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "survey cited in campaign development credits",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February chronology has unresolved day-level ordering",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ack",
        "w8-red-s-survey"
      ],
      "summary": "The acknowledgements credit survey work; draft timing and survey do not establish that survey results caused the initial draft.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-survey-reference",
        "source": "w8-red-survey",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "survey cited in campaign development credits",
        "detail": "The acknowledgements credit survey work; draft timing and survey do not establish that survey results caused the initial draft.",
        "date": "February chronology has unresolved day-level ordering",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack",
          "w8-red-s-survey"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-longview-cesia",
      "source": "longview",
      "target": "w8-red-cesia",
      "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "H1/2024 allocation",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-longview-cesia",
        "source": "longview",
        "target": "w8-red-cesia",
        "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
        "detail": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
        "date": "H1/2024 allocation",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-eff-cesia",
      "source": "w8-red-effektiv",
      "target": "w8-red-cesia",
      "label": "reported forwarding organizational support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "September2024",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1",
        "w8-red-s-eff-history"
      ],
      "summary": "Funder-reported support. CeSIA forwarding September2024; TFS March2025 history explicitly names AI-fund portion, combined EUR114000 allocation in update. No campaign restriction. Financial details: value: 195,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported organizational support; period: H1/2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-eff-cesia",
        "source": "w8-red-effektiv",
        "target": "w8-red-cesia",
        "label": "reported forwarding organizational support",
        "detail": "Funder-reported support. CeSIA forwarding September2024; TFS March2025 history explicitly names AI-fund portion, combined EUR114000 allocation in update. No campaign restriction.",
        "date": "September2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1",
          "w8-red-s-eff-history"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 195,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported organizational support; period: H1/2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-longview-tfs",
      "source": "longview",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "H2/2024 allocation",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-longview-tfs",
        "source": "longview",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "recommended organizational support via Effektiv Spenden",
        "detail": "Recommendation channel; not Longview disbursement or campaign-specific allocation.",
        "date": "H2/2024 allocation",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-eff-tfs",
      "source": "w8-red-effektiv",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "reported forwarding organizational support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2025 history / H2/2024 allocation",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2",
        "w8-red-s-eff-history"
      ],
      "summary": "Funder-reported support. CeSIA forwarding September2024; TFS March2025 history explicitly names AI-fund portion, combined EUR114000 allocation in update. No campaign restriction. Financial details: value: 114,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported organizational support; period: H2/2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-eff-tfs",
        "source": "w8-red-effektiv",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "reported forwarding organizational support",
        "detail": "Funder-reported support. CeSIA forwarding September2024; TFS March2025 history explicitly names AI-fund portion, combined EUR114000 allocation in update. No campaign restriction.",
        "date": "March2025 history / H2/2024 allocation",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
            "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2",
          "w8-red-s-eff-history"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 114,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported organizational support; period: H2/2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-sff-cesia",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "w8-red-cesia",
      "label": "recommended general support; EffiSciences receiving charity",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "SFF2024 round",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sff"
      ],
      "summary": "SFF2024 lists Jaan Tallinn as source. Not verified disbursement. Financial details: value: 48,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-sff-cesia",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "w8-red-cesia",
        "label": "recommended general support; EffiSciences receiving charity",
        "detail": "SFF2024 lists Jaan Tallinn as source. Not verified disbursement.",
        "date": "SFF2024 round",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 48,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-effisciences",
      "source": "w8-red-effisciences",
      "target": "w8-red-cesia",
      "label": "listed receiving charity for SFF recommendation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "SFF2024; no second grant amount",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sff"
      ],
      "summary": "Intermediary role named; legal agreement and onward transfer not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-effisciences",
        "source": "w8-red-effisciences",
        "target": "w8-red-cesia",
        "label": "listed receiving charity for SFF recommendation",
        "detail": "Intermediary role named; legal agreement and onward transfer not obtained.",
        "date": "SFF2024; no second grant amount",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2024",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "SFF2024",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sff"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding. Financial details: value: 97,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2024",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
        "detail": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding.",
        "date": "SFF2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 97,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2025",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "SFF2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sff"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding. Financial details: value: 336,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2025",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "recommended general support from Jaan Tallinn",
        "detail": "Recommendation table; no paid or campaign-restricted finding.",
        "date": "SFF2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 336,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-fli",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "SFF2023H2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sff"
      ],
      "summary": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer. Financial details: value: 365,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-fli",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
        "detail": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer.",
        "date": "SFF2023H2",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 365,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-tallinn",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "SFF2023H2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sff"
      ],
      "summary": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer. Financial details: value: 11,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-sff-tfs-2023-tallinn",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "named funding source in SFF general-support recommendation",
        "detail": "2023H2 recommendation only; predates call. Not added again as a separate SFF transfer.",
        "date": "SFF2023H2",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
            "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 11,000; currency: USD; kind: grant recommendation; period: 2023H2"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-solicitation",
      "source": "w8-red-cesia",
      "target": "w8-red-sprint",
      "label": "requested funding for diplomatic follow-through",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Created Dec4,2025; later update undated",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sprint"
      ],
      "summary": "USD150000 request for Q1-Q22026; approximate full-year plan USD400000. Platform displays USD0, which excludes off-platform financing. Financial details: value: 150,000; currency: USD; kind: funding request; period: Q1-Q2 2026",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-solicitation",
        "source": "w8-red-cesia",
        "target": "w8-red-sprint",
        "label": "requested funding for diplomatic follow-through",
        "detail": "USD150000 request for Q1-Q22026; approximate full-year plan USD400000. Platform displays USD0, which excludes off-platform financing.",
        "date": "Created Dec4,2025; later update undated",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sprint"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 150,000; currency: USD; kind: funding request; period: Q1-Q2 2026"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-sprint-call",
      "source": "w8-red-sprint",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "proposes converting campaign support into agreements",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 plan, not completion",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sprint"
      ],
      "summary": "Targets champion states, aligned lab thresholds and a UN resolution. Anticipates competitive benefit for Anthropic/DeepMind; their agreement is not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-sprint-call",
        "source": "w8-red-sprint",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "proposes converting campaign support into agreements",
        "detail": "Targets champion states, aligned lab thresholds and a UN resolution. Anticipates competitive benefit for Anthropic/DeepMind; their agreement is not established.",
        "date": "2026 plan, not completion",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sprint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-longview-2m",
      "source": "longview",
      "target": "w8-red-cesia",
      "label": "recipient reports two-year recommendation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recommendation dated9Dec2025; statement update undated",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sprint"
      ],
      "summary": "CeSIA reports Dec9,2025 recommendation and non-receipt at undated statement time. No payment, legal grantor, current outstanding balance or Red Lines restriction established. Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant recommendation; period: two years; start unspecified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-longview-2m",
        "source": "longview",
        "target": "w8-red-cesia",
        "label": "recipient reports two-year recommendation",
        "detail": "CeSIA reports Dec9,2025 recommendation and non-receipt at undated statement time. No payment, legal grantor, current outstanding balance or Red Lines restriction established.",
        "date": "Recommendation dated9Dec2025; statement update undated",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sprint"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 2,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported grant recommendation; period: two years; start unspecified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-tfs-subgroup",
      "source": "w8-red-tfs",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
      ],
      "summary": "Independent CSO work under UNESCO network; does not commit UNESCO or member states.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-tfs-subgroup",
        "source": "w8-red-tfs",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
        "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
        "detail": "Independent CSO work under UNESCO network; does not commit UNESCO or member states.",
        "date": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ada-subgroup",
      "source": "w8-red-ada",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
      ],
      "summary": "listed subgroup co-lead",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ada-subgroup",
        "source": "w8-red-ada",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
        "label": "listed subgroup co-lead",
        "detail": "listed subgroup co-lead",
        "date": "Listed9September2026; role start unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-cesia-subgroup",
      "source": "w8-red-cesia",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "label": "listed subgroup member",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed9September2026",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
      ],
      "summary": "listed subgroup member",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-cesia-subgroup",
        "source": "w8-red-cesia",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
        "label": "listed subgroup member",
        "detail": "listed subgroup member",
        "date": "Listed9September2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-subgroup-network",
      "source": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
      "label": "works within network framework",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
      ],
      "summary": "Independent activities; hosting does not delegate state rulemaking authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-subgroup-network",
        "source": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
        "label": "works within network framework",
        "detail": "Independent activities; hosting does not delegate state rulemaking authority.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-unesco-network",
      "source": "w8-red-unesco",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
      "label": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "LaunchedJune2025, before Global Call",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-network"
      ],
      "summary": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-unesco-network",
        "source": "w8-red-unesco",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
        "label": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
        "detail": "hosts civil-society and academic network",
        "date": "LaunchedJune2025, before Global Call",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-network"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-tereza-representative",
      "source": "w8-red-zoumpalova",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
      "label": "named subgroup representative in coordination group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed9September2026",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-coordination"
      ],
      "summary": "Organizational participation, not UNESCO officer status or personal veto rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-tereza-representative",
        "source": "w8-red-zoumpalova",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-subgroup",
        "label": "named subgroup representative in coordination group",
        "detail": "Organizational participation, not UNESCO officer status or personal veto rights.",
        "date": "Listed9September2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-coordination"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-mcgovern-network",
      "source": "w8-red-mcgovern",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
      "label": "initial network funding attributed by UNESCO",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 umbrella network",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-network"
      ],
      "summary": "Supports umbrella network through2025project. No amount or Global Call allocation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-mcgovern-network",
        "source": "w8-red-mcgovern",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
        "label": "initial network funding attributed by UNESCO",
        "detail": "Supports umbrella network through2025project. No amount or Global Call allocation established.",
        "date": "2025 umbrella network",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-network"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ukri-pilot",
      "source": "w5-enc-ukri",
      "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
      "label": "funded preceding pilot per UNESCO history",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Pilot predates June2025 network",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-unesco-network"
      ],
      "summary": "Earlier pilot ancestry, not campaign funding or current subgroup grant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ukri-pilot",
        "source": "w5-enc-ukri",
        "target": "w8-red-unesco-network",
        "label": "funded preceding pilot per UNESCO history",
        "detail": "Earlier pilot ancestry, not campaign funding or current subgroup grant.",
        "date": "Pilot predates June2025 network",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-network"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ressa-call",
      "source": "w8-red-ressa",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "advocated named campaign in UN-hosted prepared speech",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ressa"
      ],
      "summary": "Submitted statement page3; not a UN resolution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ressa-call",
        "source": "w8-red-ressa",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "advocated named campaign in UN-hosted prepared speech",
        "detail": "Submitted statement page3; not a UN resolution.",
        "date": "22September2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ressa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-ressa-venue",
      "source": "w8-red-ressa",
      "target": "w8-red-unga80",
      "label": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-ressa"
      ],
      "summary": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-ressa-venue",
        "source": "w8-red-ressa",
        "target": "w8-red-unga80",
        "label": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
        "detail": "submitted campaign-bearing speech",
        "date": "22September2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
            "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ressa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-bengio-venue",
      "source": "w8-red-bengio",
      "target": "w8-red-unsc10005",
      "label": "advocated international red lines in recorded intervention",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "24September2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-bengio"
      ],
      "summary": "UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-bengio-venue",
        "source": "w8-red-bengio",
        "target": "w8-red-unsc10005",
        "label": "advocated international red lines in recorded intervention",
        "detail": "UN automatic transcript, not official record; same meeting records disagreement. No Council adoption.",
        "date": "24September2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
            "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-bengio"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-clement-call",
      "source": "w8-red-clement-jones",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "29January2026",
      "sources": [
        "src-5747555ff9d7"
      ],
      "summary": "Parliamentary advocacy. Government commissioning or acceptance of campaign treaty unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-clement-call",
        "source": "w8-red-clement-jones",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate",
        "detail": "Parliamentary advocacy. Government commissioning or acceptance of campaign treaty unestablished.",
        "date": "29January2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5747555ff9d7"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-india-tfs",
      "source": "w8-red-tfs",
      "target": "w8-red-india-workshop",
      "label": "reported workshop co-organization",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February2026",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-india"
      ],
      "summary": "Organizer-reported session. Government declaration is separately voluntary/nonbinding; no drafting link established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-india-tfs",
        "source": "w8-red-tfs",
        "target": "w8-red-india-workshop",
        "label": "reported workshop co-organization",
        "detail": "Organizer-reported session. Government declaration is separately voluntary/nonbinding; no drafting link established.",
        "date": "February2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-india"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-india-cesia",
      "source": "w8-red-cesia",
      "target": "w8-red-india-workshop",
      "label": "reported workshop co-organization",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February2026",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-india"
      ],
      "summary": "Organizer-reported session. Government declaration is separately voluntary/nonbinding; no drafting link established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-india-cesia",
        "source": "w8-red-cesia",
        "target": "w8-red-india-workshop",
        "label": "reported workshop co-organization",
        "detail": "Organizer-reported session. Government declaration is separately voluntary/nonbinding; no drafting link established.",
        "date": "February2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-india"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-tfs",
      "source": "w8-red-tfs",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "organized policy roundtable",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens",
        "w8-red-s-athens-page"
      ],
      "summary": "organized policy roundtable",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-tfs",
        "source": "w8-red-tfs",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "organized policy roundtable",
        "detail": "organized policy roundtable",
        "date": "4December2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens",
          "w8-red-s-athens-page"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-call",
      "source": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "target": "w8-red-call",
      "label": "developed agenda building on campaign",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens-page"
      ],
      "summary": "Organizer account of program continuity, not proof every attendee endorsed campaign.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-call",
        "source": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "target": "w8-red-call",
        "label": "developed agenda building on campaign",
        "detail": "Organizer account of program continuity, not proof every attendee endorsed campaign.",
        "date": "4December2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens-page"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-unesco",
      "source": "w8-red-unesco",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "credited as event partner",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025; recap p2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "credited as event partner",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-unesco",
        "source": "w8-red-unesco",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "credited as event partner",
        "detail": "credited as event partner",
        "date": "4December2025; recap p2",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-oecd",
      "source": "oecd",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "credited as event partner",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025; recap p2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "credited as event partner",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-oecd",
        "source": "oecd",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "credited as event partner",
        "detail": "credited as event partner",
        "date": "4December2025; recap p2",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-caf",
      "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-caf",
        "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
        "detail": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
        "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-arnold",
      "source": "w8-red-arnold-porter",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-arnold",
        "source": "w8-red-arnold-porter",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
        "detail": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
        "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-fathom",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-fathom",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
        "detail": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
        "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-deliberaide",
      "source": "w8-red-deliberaide",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-athens-support-deliberaide",
        "source": "w8-red-deliberaide",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "credited event support; form and amount unspecified",
        "detail": "Report p2 support credits; no payment total, contract or editorial right established.",
        "date": "4December2025 event; PDFp2",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-leanda-role",
      "source": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
      "target": "5rights",
      "label": "identified as executive director at event",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025; historical event role",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "identified as executive director at event",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-leanda-role",
        "source": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
        "target": "5rights",
        "label": "identified as executive director at event",
        "detail": "identified as executive director at event",
        "date": "4December2025; historical event role",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-leanda-athens",
      "source": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "presented child-rights AI safeguards",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "Event recap p23 identifies speaker and account of remarks; not independently watched video.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-leanda-athens",
        "source": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "presented child-rights AI safeguards",
        "detail": "Event recap p23 identifies speaker and account of remarks; not independently watched video.",
        "date": "4December2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-e-leanda-code",
      "source": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
      "target": "w8-red-childrens-code",
      "label": "advocated as model for AI safety by design",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025; PDFp23",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "Specific policy-model transmission at Athens. Does not establish mandatory identity checking, an enacted rule or shared command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-e-leanda-code",
        "source": "w8-red-barrington-leach",
        "target": "w8-red-childrens-code",
        "label": "advocated as model for AI safety by design",
        "detail": "Specific policy-model transmission at Athens. Does not establish mandatory identity checking, an enacted rule or shared command.",
        "date": "4December2025; PDFp23",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-fathom-tfs",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w8-red-tfs",
      "label": "publicly describes verified-redlines partnership",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed9September2026; start unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-fathom"
      ],
      "summary": "Current organizational collaboration; not proof of September2025 campaign financing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-fathom-tfs",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w8-red-tfs",
        "label": "publicly describes verified-redlines partnership",
        "detail": "Current organizational collaboration; not proof of September2025 campaign financing.",
        "date": "Observed9September2026; start unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fathom partnerships",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-fathom"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-fathom-series",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w8-follow-athens-series",
      "label": "financial support acknowledged by event series",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-athens-history"
      ],
      "summary": "Organizer-reported funding; no amount, year or2025allocation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-fathom-series",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w8-follow-athens-series",
        "label": "financial support acknowledged by event series",
        "detail": "Organizer-reported funding; no amount, year or2025allocation established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens series history",
            "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-athens-history"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-annual-event",
      "source": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "target": "w8-follow-athens-series",
      "label": "seventh edition of event series",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "4December2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-athens"
      ],
      "summary": "seventh edition of event series",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-annual-event",
        "source": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "target": "w8-follow-athens-series",
        "label": "seventh edition of event series",
        "detail": "seventh edition of event series",
        "date": "4December2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-athens"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-reception",
      "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "reports hosting preceding speakers reception",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "3December2025 inferred; event4December2025",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-caif-event"
      ],
      "summary": "House of Lords venue; no parliamentary endorsement inferred. Previous evening implies3December from known4December event.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-reception",
        "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "reports hosting preceding speakers reception",
        "detail": "House of Lords venue; no parliamentary endorsement inferred. Previous evening implies3December from known4December event.",
        "date": "3December2025 inferred; event4December2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-caif-event"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-dialogue-part",
      "source": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "target": "w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
      "label": "included private red-lines discussion",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-caif-event"
      ],
      "summary": "included private red-lines discussion",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-dialogue-part",
        "source": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "target": "w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
        "label": "included private red-lines discussion",
        "detail": "included private red-lines discussion",
        "date": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-caif-event"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-caif-monitoring",
      "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "target": "w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
      "label": "reports advocating multi-agent risk monitoring",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-caif-event"
      ],
      "summary": "Named contribution to discussion; acceptance unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-caif-monitoring",
        "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "target": "w8-follow-athens-dialogue",
        "label": "reports advocating multi-agent risk monitoring",
        "detail": "Named contribution to discussion; acceptance unestablished.",
        "date": "2025-12-04 – 2025-12-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-caif-event"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-macroscopic-commitment",
      "source": "w8-follow-macroscopic",
      "target": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "label": "philanthropic commitment reported by recipient",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation"
      ],
      "summary": "USD15million organizational commitment; payment dates, conditions and Athens allocation not obtained. Financial details: value: 15,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported philanthropic commitment; period: unspecified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-macroscopic-commitment",
        "source": "w8-follow-macroscopic",
        "target": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "label": "philanthropic commitment reported by recipient",
        "detail": "USD15million organizational commitment; payment dates, conditions and Athens allocation not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 15,000,000; currency: USD; kind: reported philanthropic commitment; period: unspecified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-clifton-appointment",
      "source": "w8-follow-clifton",
      "target": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "label": "appointed director",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-caif-filings"
      ],
      "summary": "Appointment event; does not establish donor appointment rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-clifton-appointment",
        "source": "w8-follow-clifton",
        "target": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "label": "appointed director",
        "detail": "Appointment event; does not establish donor appointment rights.",
        "date": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-caif-filings"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-clifton-donor-role",
      "source": "w8-follow-clifton",
      "target": "w8-follow-macroscopic",
      "label": "listed as grantmaking officer",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated page observed9September2026",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation"
      ],
      "summary": "Current recipient-hosted biography; historical role start and overlap on appointment day not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-clifton-donor-role",
        "source": "w8-follow-clifton",
        "target": "w8-follow-macroscopic",
        "label": "listed as grantmaking officer",
        "detail": "Current recipient-hosted biography; historical role start and overlap on appointment day not established.",
        "date": "Undated page observed9September2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-deliberaide-workflow",
      "source": "w8-red-deliberaide",
      "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
      "label": "platform use reported in attributed client testimonial",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Testimonial explicitly names Athens2025; exact service period unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-deliberaide"
      ],
      "summary": "Reported assistance with engagement and report production; not a verified donation, executed processing agreement or editorial authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-deliberaide-workflow",
        "source": "w8-red-deliberaide",
        "target": "w8-red-athens2025",
        "label": "platform use reported in attributed client testimonial",
        "detail": "Reported assistance with engagement and report production; not a verified donation, executed processing agreement or editorial authority.",
        "date": "Testimonial explicitly names Athens2025; exact service period unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-deliberaide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-cesia-france",
      "source": "w8-red-cesia",
      "target": "w8-follow-france-g7",
      "label": "targeted as champion-state opportunity",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 diplomatic plan",
      "sources": [
        "w8-red-s-sprint"
      ],
      "summary": "Project intention, not government acceptance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-cesia-france",
        "source": "w8-red-cesia",
        "target": "w8-follow-france-g7",
        "label": "targeted as champion-state opportunity",
        "detail": "Project intention, not government acceptance.",
        "date": "2026 diplomatic plan",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sprint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-cesia-event",
      "source": "w8-red-cesia",
      "target": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
      "label": "named event co-organizer",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-sciencespo",
        "w8-follow-s-cesia-report"
      ],
      "summary": "Host programme plus organizer retrospective; not state endorsement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-cesia-event",
        "source": "w8-red-cesia",
        "target": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
        "label": "named event co-organizer",
        "detail": "Host programme plus organizer retrospective; not state endorsement.",
        "date": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-sciencespo",
          "w8-follow-s-cesia-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-mirlesse-event",
      "source": "w8-follow-mirlesse",
      "target": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
      "label": "scheduled moderator in institutional programme",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-sciencespo"
      ],
      "summary": "Programme connection; attendance, briefing receipt and negotiating mandate unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-mirlesse-event",
        "source": "w8-follow-mirlesse",
        "target": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
        "label": "scheduled moderator in institutional programme",
        "detail": "Programme connection; attendance, briefing receipt and negotiating mandate unestablished.",
        "date": "2026-03-10 – 2026-03-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-sciencespo"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-g7-label",
      "source": "w8-follow-france-g7",
      "target": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
      "label": "G7 label awarded according to organizer",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 event; later organizer account",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-cesia-report"
      ],
      "summary": "Award instrument and scope not obtained; not endorsement of a slowdown proposal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-g7-label",
        "source": "w8-follow-france-g7",
        "target": "w8-follow-sciencespo-march",
        "label": "G7 label awarded according to organizer",
        "detail": "Award instrument and scope not obtained; not endorsement of a slowdown proposal.",
        "date": "March2026 event; later organizer account",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-cesia-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-g7-comparability",
      "source": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "target": "w8-follow-risk-comparability",
      "label": "committed to risk-framework comparability discussions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial"
      ],
      "summary": "Official future-work commitment with international evaluation network and OECD; no common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-g7-comparability",
        "source": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
        "target": "w8-follow-risk-comparability",
        "label": "committed to risk-framework comparability discussions",
        "detail": "Official future-work commitment with international evaluation network and OECD; no common threshold or coordinated slowdown trigger.",
        "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-e-g7-openness",
      "source": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "target": "w8-follow-g7-open-ai",
      "label": "promoted AI openness and broader adoption",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial"
      ],
      "summary": "Page2 explicitly connects openness with innovation and adoption. This official position coexists with risk-framework coordination.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-e-g7-openness",
        "source": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
        "target": "w8-follow-g7-open-ai",
        "label": "promoted AI openness and broader adoption",
        "detail": "Page2 explicitly connects openness with innovation and adoption. This official position coexists with risk-framework coordination.",
        "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-caif",
      "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
        "w9-assure-s-fund-caif"
      ],
      "summary": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-caif",
        "source": "w8-red-cooperative-ai",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
        "detail": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-caif"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt",
      "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-portal"
      ],
      "summary": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt",
        "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
        "detail": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-portal"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-aria",
      "source": "w9-assure-aria",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
        "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind"
      ],
      "summary": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-aria",
        "source": "w9-assure-aria",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
        "detail": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-deepmind",
      "source": "deepmind",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
        "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind"
      ],
      "summary": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-deepmind",
        "source": "deepmind",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "named joint supporting party considering applications",
        "detail": "Joint consideration; voting, recusal and individual contributions not disclosed. DeepMind is the named current brand, not an identified legal grantor or separate cash contribution.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-admin",
      "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "hosts application and administrative front door",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-portal"
      ],
      "summary": "Portal/contact establishes administration, not exclusive award control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-admin",
        "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "hosts application and administrative front door",
        "detail": "Portal/contact establishes administration, not exclusive award control.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-portal"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-google-route",
      "source": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "target": "w9-assure-google-option",
      "label": "offers optional differentiated funding route",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "Applicants may opt out while remaining eligible for Schmidt, ARIA and CAIF. No executed or paid grant established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-google-route",
        "source": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "target": "w9-assure-google-option",
        "label": "offers optional differentiated funding route",
        "detail": "Applicants may opt out while remaining eligible for Schmidt, ARIA and CAIF. No executed or paid grant established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-google-conditions",
      "source": "w9-assure-google-option",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "conditions prospective awards on openness and AI Principles",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-faq",
        "w9-assure-s-google-principles"
      ],
      "summary": "Google route: Apache2.0 code/inventions, CC-BY4.0 specified IP within3months, public-domain residual IP, no patents and open data subject to privacy law. Edition/dispute rights unknown. Does not bind every partner award.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-google-conditions",
        "source": "w9-assure-google-option",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "conditions prospective awards on openness and AI Principles",
        "detail": "Google route: Apache2.0 code/inventions, CC-BY4.0 specified IP within3months, public-domain residual IP, no patents and open data subject to privacy law. Edition/dispute rights unknown. Does not bind every partner award.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
            "url": "https://ai.google/principles/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-faq",
          "w9-assure-s-google-principles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal",
      "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
      "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "label": "describes progress-dependent annual funding",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "Later years depend on progress/reporting; no guaranteed renewal or demonstrated clawback of paid funds. Call-specific duration1-2years governs over generic FAQ wording.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal",
        "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
        "target": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "label": "describes progress-dependent annual funding",
        "detail": "Later years depend on progress/reporting; no guaranteed renewal or demonstrated clawback of paid funds. Call-specific duration1-2years governs over generic FAQ wording.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-agenda",
      "source": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
      "target": "w9-assure-agent-infrastructure",
      "label": "solicits research on coordination and admission mechanisms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-fund-agenda"
      ],
      "summary": "Commercial product development and one privileged controller of all agents are excluded; research does not compel deployment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fund-agenda",
        "source": "w9-assure-multi-agent-fund",
        "target": "w9-assure-agent-infrastructure",
        "label": "solicits research on coordination and admission mechanisms",
        "detail": "Commercial product development and one privileged controller of all agents are excluded; research does not compel deployment.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-agenda"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-sponsor",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "label": "sponsors legislative proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "First announcement26March2025; subsequent sponsor status in packet",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-sb813-author",
        "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary"
      ],
      "summary": "Official author/committee identify sponsorship. Does not establish exclusive drafting/approval. Meridian arm is attributed, legal identity unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-sponsor",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "label": "sponsors legislative proposal",
        "detail": "Official author/committee identify sponsorship. Does not establish exclusive drafting/approval. Meridian arm is attributed, legal identity unresolved.",
        "date": "First announcement26March2025; subsequent sponsor status in packet",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
            "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-author",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fathom-prospective-mro",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w9-assure-old-mro",
      "label": "reported seeking prospective recognized-operator role",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-29 – 2025-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary"
      ],
      "summary": "Judiciary pp1/9 report Fathom hoped to be an MRO and considered itself qualified. Historical aspiration, not designation, award or monopoly.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fathom-prospective-mro",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w9-assure-old-mro",
        "label": "reported seeking prospective recognized-operator role",
        "detail": "Judiciary pp1/9 report Fathom hoped to be an MRO and considered itself qualified. Historical aspiration, not designation, award or monopoly.",
        "date": "2025-04-29 – 2025-04-29",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-version-change",
      "source": "w9-assure-old-mro",
      "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "label": "earlier certification framework superseded in enrolled text",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-01 – 2026-09-01",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary",
        "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled"
      ],
      "summary": "Final audit may be relevant but not conclusive; neither affirmative defense nor rebuttable presumption survives. No causal attribution for each deletion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-version-change",
        "source": "w9-assure-old-mro",
        "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "label": "earlier certification framework superseded in enrolled text",
        "detail": "Final audit may be relevant but not conclusive; neither affirmative defense nor rebuttable presumption survives. No causal attribution for each deletion.",
        "date": "2026-09-01 – 2026-09-01",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-bsa-pressure",
      "source": "w9-assure-bsa",
      "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "label": "objects that voluntary audits could become litigation expectations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-30 – 2026-08-30",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-sb813-floor"
      ],
      "summary": "Floor pp6-7 report predicted indirect pressure alongside competence/alignment concerns; not evidence of actual refusal or legal compulsion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-bsa-pressure",
        "source": "w9-assure-bsa",
        "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "label": "objects that voluntary audits could become litigation expectations",
        "detail": "Floor pp6-7 report predicted indirect pressure alongside competence/alignment concerns; not evidence of actual refusal or legal compulsion.",
        "date": "2026-08-30 – 2026-08-30",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-floor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-ministers",
      "source": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "target": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
      "label": "adopt shared minors principles",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-principles",
        "w9-assure-s-g7-uk"
      ],
      "summary": "Political agreement29May; domestic law supplies compulsion. Current PDF export17June.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-ministers",
        "source": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
        "target": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
        "label": "adopt shared minors principles",
        "detail": "Political agreement29May; domestic law supplies compulsion. Current PDF export17June.",
        "date": "2026-05-29 – 2026-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-principles",
          "w9-assure-s-g7-uk"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-call",
      "source": "w9-assure-g7-leaders",
      "target": "w9-assure-g7-call",
      "label": "adopt call including conversational-AI age assurance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy commitment preserves national frameworks; under18 not universal18-plus rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-call",
        "source": "w9-assure-g7-leaders",
        "target": "w9-assure-g7-call",
        "label": "adopt call including conversational-AI age assurance",
        "detail": "Policy commitment preserves national frameworks; under18 not universal18-plus rule.",
        "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-welcome",
      "source": "w9-assure-g7-call",
      "target": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
      "label": "welcomes preceding ministerial principles",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders"
      ],
      "summary": "Explicit instrument reference, not a new domestic law.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-welcome",
        "source": "w9-assure-g7-call",
        "target": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
        "label": "welcomes preceding ministerial principles",
        "detail": "Explicit instrument reference, not a new domestic law.",
        "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-review",
      "source": "w9-assure-g7-leaders",
      "target": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "label": "requests regular meetings and year-end progress review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF3 asks for progress assessment by end2026; no completed review inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-review",
        "source": "w9-assure-g7-leaders",
        "target": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
        "label": "requests regular meetings and year-end progress review",
        "detail": "PDF3 asks for progress assessment by end2026; no completed review inferred.",
        "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy",
      "source": "w9-assure-g7-dpas",
      "target": "w9-assure-g7-privacy",
      "label": "adopts contextual and privacy-preserving assurance guidance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Opposes identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; not enforcement decision or verified safeguard.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy",
        "source": "w9-assure-g7-dpas",
        "target": "w9-assure-g7-privacy",
        "label": "adopts contextual and privacy-preserving assurance guidance",
        "detail": "Opposes identification/tracking/profiling/monitoring; not enforcement decision or verified safeguard.",
        "date": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy-reference",
      "source": "w9-assure-g7-privacy",
      "target": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
      "label": "expressly references ministerial assurance commitments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Separate regulator guidance qualifies use; ISO reference does not mandate certification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy-reference",
        "source": "w9-assure-g7-privacy",
        "target": "w9-assure-g7-principles",
        "label": "expressly references ministerial assurance commitments",
        "detail": "Separate regulator guidance qualifies use; ISO reference does not mandate certification.",
        "date": "2026-06-25 – 2026-06-26",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-unicef",
      "source": "w9-assure-unicef",
      "target": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
      "label": "reports providing advance evidence",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Before meetings; reported1June2026",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-unicef"
      ],
      "summary": "Original package, receipt, adopted wording and implementation plan not recovered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-unicef",
        "source": "w9-assure-unicef",
        "target": "w8-follow-g7-ministers",
        "label": "reports providing advance evidence",
        "detail": "Original package, receipt, adopted wording and implementation plan not recovered.",
        "date": "Before meetings; reported1June2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-unicef"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-premarket",
      "source": "5rights",
      "target": "w9-assure-5rights-premarket",
      "label": "demands premarket certification beyond G7 outcome",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-g7-5rights"
      ],
      "summary": "Proposed access condition, not adopted duty or evidence of industry-written clauses.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-g7-premarket",
        "source": "5rights",
        "target": "w9-assure-5rights-premarket",
        "label": "demands premarket certification beyond G7 outcome",
        "detail": "Proposed access condition, not adopted duty or evidence of industry-written clauses.",
        "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-5rights"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fathom-paris",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w9-assure-paris-simulation",
      "label": "publishes reported verification simulation findings",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-paris-report"
      ],
      "summary": "Reported unresolved safeguards and differing participant assessments; not operational government arrangement or cover-up.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fathom-paris",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w9-assure-paris-simulation",
        "label": "publishes reported verification simulation findings",
        "detail": "Reported unresolved safeguards and differing participant assessments; not operational government arrangement or cover-up.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-paris-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-fathom-ashby",
      "source": "w8-red-fathom",
      "target": "w9-assure-ashby-proposals",
      "label": "publishes verification and commercial-incentive proposals",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w9-assure-s-ashby-report",
        "w9-assure-s-fathom-approach"
      ],
      "summary": "No actual insurance schedule, procurement gate or single deployed identity system acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-fathom-ashby",
        "source": "w8-red-fathom",
        "target": "w9-assure-ashby-proposals",
        "label": "publishes verification and commercial-incentive proposals",
        "detail": "No actual insurance schedule, procurement gate or single deployed identity system acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/approach"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-ashby-report",
          "w9-assure-s-fathom-approach"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-carnegie-review",
      "source": "w10-duty-carnegie",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "earlier model work cited in review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review",
        "w10-duty-s-carnegie2022"
      ],
      "summary": "Review section5.5/footnotes34-38 cites Carnegie2019model and2021 criticism.2022 Australian submission separately demonstrates an input route; no exclusive authorship of2026 clauses.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-carnegie-review",
        "source": "w10-duty-carnegie",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "earlier model work cited in review",
        "detail": "Review section5.5/footnotes34-38 cites Carnegie2019model and2021 criticism.2022 Australian submission separately demonstrates an input route; no exclusive authorship of2026 clauses.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
            "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review",
          "w10-duty-s-carnegie2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-woods-review",
      "source": "w10-duty-woods",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "credited with duty-of-care conception",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Review attributes conception to Woods and Perrin. This is a documented attribution, not proof of every historical origin or current approval rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-woods-review",
        "source": "w10-duty-woods",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "credited with duty-of-care conception",
        "detail": "Review attributes conception to Woods and Perrin. This is a documented attribution, not proof of every historical origin or current approval rights.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-perrin-review",
      "source": "w10-duty-perrin",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "credited with duty-of-care conception",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Review names Perrin alongside Woods. No new money, private direction or clause clearance established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-perrin-review",
        "source": "w10-duty-perrin",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "credited with duty-of-care conception",
        "detail": "Review names Perrin alongside Woods. No new money, private direction or clause clearance established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-woods-network",
      "source": "w10-duty-woods",
      "target": "w10-duty-network",
      "label": "identified as principal adviser",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2024 submission; effective tenure unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-network68"
      ],
      "summary": "Role in June2024 submission; not a legal-control or current individual-veto finding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-woods-network",
        "source": "w10-duty-woods",
        "target": "w10-duty-network",
        "label": "identified as principal adviser",
        "detail": "Role in June2024 submission; not a legal-control or current individual-veto finding.",
        "date": "June2024 submission; effective tenure unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "person",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-network68"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-network-review",
      "source": "w10-duty-network",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "submits systems-focused policy recommendations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2024",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-network68"
      ],
      "summary": "Government-hosted submission68 advocates Australian UK/EU alignment and risk/design duties. Publication confirms submitted argument; full adoption not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-network-review",
        "source": "w10-duty-network",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "submits systems-focused policy recommendations",
        "detail": "Government-hosted submission68 advocates Australian UK/EU alignment and risk/design duties. Publication confirms submitted argument; full adoption not established.",
        "date": "June2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-network68"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-farthing-reset",
      "source": "w10-duty-farthing",
      "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "label": "identified with Australian organization in byline",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "22April2024 article; tenure unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-joint-article"
      ],
      "summary": "Affiliation associated with22April2024 joint article; no undisclosed financing or control inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-farthing-reset",
        "source": "w10-duty-farthing",
        "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "label": "identified with Australian organization in byline",
        "detail": "Affiliation associated with22April2024 joint article; no undisclosed financing or control inferred.",
        "date": "22April2024 article; tenure unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "person",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-joint-article"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-woods-article",
      "source": "w10-duty-woods",
      "target": "w10-duty-joint-output",
      "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-joint-article"
      ],
      "summary": "Shared authored output with Farthing; not evidence of a formal OSANetwork-Reset agreement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-woods-article",
        "source": "w10-duty-woods",
        "target": "w10-duty-joint-output",
        "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
        "detail": "Shared authored output with Farthing; not evidence of a formal OSANetwork-Reset agreement.",
        "date": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-joint-article"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-farthing-article",
      "source": "w10-duty-farthing",
      "target": "w10-duty-joint-output",
      "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-joint-article"
      ],
      "summary": "Organization-level funding disclosure does not establish this article commissioning or Woods personal funding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-farthing-article",
        "source": "w10-duty-farthing",
        "target": "w10-duty-joint-output",
        "label": "coauthors singular-duty argument",
        "detail": "Organization-level funding disclosure does not establish this article commissioning or Woods personal funding.",
        "date": "2024-04-22 – 2024-04-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
            "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-joint-article"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-reset-review",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "submission70 argument quoted in recommendation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-reset70",
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Review section5.5 directly quotes Reset on inadequacy of content-specific duties. Stronger than shared wording; does not establish final-clause authorship.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-reset-review",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "submission70 argument quoted in recommendation",
        "detail": "Review section5.5 directly quotes Reset on inadequacy of content-specific duties. Stronger than shared wording; does not establish final-clause authorship.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-reset70",
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-review-draft",
      "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "target": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "label": "earlier overarching-duty recommendation reflected in proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "inferred",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review",
        "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "w10-duty-s-announcement"
      ],
      "summary": "Comparison shows an overarching duty in both review recommendation and later exposure draft. Exact departmental drafting chain and attribution of particular clauses remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-review-draft",
        "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "target": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "label": "earlier overarching-duty recommendation reflected in proposal",
        "detail": "Comparison shows an overarching duty in both review recommendation and later exposure draft. Exact departmental drafting chain and attribution of particular clauses remain not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "inferred",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review",
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w10-duty-s-announcement"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-provider",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
      "label": "would impose reasonably practicable safe-environment duty",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections25H,26-26A PDF35-38: risk assessment, design and effective measures; proportionality rather than zero-harm guarantee. Proposed, not enacted or implemented.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-provider",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
        "label": "would impose reasonably practicable safe-environment duty",
        "detail": "Sections25H,26-26A PDF35-38: risk assessment, design and effective measures; proportionality rather than zero-harm guarantee. Proposed, not enacted or implemented.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-minister",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "label": "would delegate specified scope and harm-category rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections25A-G and27B: exemptions, specified additions and empowerment tools. Advice requirements vary;27B does not list every power. Thresholds constrain general serious-harm additions. Future instruments not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-minister",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "label": "would delegate specified scope and harm-category rules",
        "detail": "Sections25A-G and27B: exemptions, specified additions and empowerment tools. Advice requirements vary;27B does not list every power. Thresholds constrain general serious-harm additions. Future instruments not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-minister-provider",
      "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
      "label": "would specify exemptions and some user-empowerment requirements",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections25A,25B and26(4)-(6). Not current individual orders, automatic small-business exemption or a fixed adult opt-out interface.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-minister-provider",
        "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
        "label": "would specify exemptions and some user-empowerment requirements",
        "detail": "Sections25A,25B and26(4)-(6). Not current individual orders, automatic small-business exemption or a fixed adult opt-out interface.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-esafety",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "would extend assessment and compliance powers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "w10-duty-s-existing-act"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections26A and198-205 specify assessments/information, building on existing authority. New general compliance limb excludes Part4A age-ban duties. No universal identity-collection mandate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-esafety",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "would extend assessment and compliance powers",
        "detail": "Sections26A and198-205 specify assessments/information, building on existing authority. New general compliance limb excludes Part4A age-ban duties. No universal identity-collection mandate.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w10-duty-s-existing-act"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-esafety-provider",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
      "label": "would issue compliance directions on reasonable belief",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Section26D PDF38-39: reasonable belief of past/present noncompliance triggers written future-prevention directions. Not unlimited orders. Civil penalties and infringement notices have distinct processes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-esafety-provider",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
        "label": "would issue compliance directions on reasonable belief",
        "detail": "Section26D PDF38-39: reasonable belief of past/present noncompliance triggers written future-prevention directions. Not unlimited orders. Civil penalties and infringement notices have distinct processes.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-adult",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w10-duty-private-adult-limit",
      "label": "limits what duty requires for private adult communications",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Section26(7) PDF36: does not require action regarding lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Does not prohibit intervention under every other power; adult-AI coverage unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-adult",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w10-duty-private-adult-limit",
        "label": "limits what duty requires for private adult communications",
        "detail": "Section26(7) PDF36: does not require action regarding lawful communications privately solely between consenting adults. Does not prohibit intervention under every other power; adult-AI coverage unresolved.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-privacy",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w10-duty-privacy-factor",
      "label": "includes privacy in proportionality assessment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections26-26A consider privacy alongside risk and practicability. Not a blanket encryption exemption, universal consent rule or observed operational safeguard.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-privacy",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w10-duty-privacy-factor",
        "label": "includes privacy in proportionality assessment",
        "detail": "Sections26-26A consider privacy alongside risk and practicability. Not a blanket encryption exemption, universal consent rule or observed operational safeguard.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-review",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w10-duty-merits-review",
      "label": "makes specified decisions reviewable",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "w10-duty-s-existing-act"
      ],
      "summary": "Schedule2 item58 adds specified decisions including26D directions to ART review. No general automatic stay or complete instrument/disallowance audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-review",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w10-duty-merits-review",
        "label": "makes specified decisions reviewable",
        "detail": "Schedule2 item58 adds specified decisions including26D directions to ART review. No general automatic stay or complete instrument/disallowance audit.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w10-duty-s-existing-act"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-review-esafety",
      "source": "w10-duty-merits-review",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "would permit review of specified Commissioner decisions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Review is a boundary on specified proposed decisions, not evidence of a successful appeal or ability to reverse every rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-review-esafety",
        "source": "w10-duty-merits-review",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "would permit review of specified Commissioner decisions",
        "detail": "Review is a boundary on specified proposed decisions, not evidence of a successful appeal or ability to reverse every rule.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-reset-research-request",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w10-duty-third-sector-request",
      "label": "requests vetted access including third-sector organizations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-reset70"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed26/PDF28 of2024 submission. Desired eligibility, not a granted right, contract or regulator designation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-reset-research-request",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w10-duty-third-sector-request",
        "label": "requests vetted access including third-sector organizations",
        "detail": "Printed26/PDF28 of2024 submission. Desired eligibility, not a granted right, contract or regulator designation.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-reset70"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-research",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w10-duty-research-role",
      "label": "would restrict eligibility to approved university researchers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Section205B: Australian-university employment, approval under legislative rules, ethics and prescribed public-interest research. Not NGO/company access merely by invitation or affiliation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-draft-research",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w10-duty-research-role",
        "label": "would restrict eligibility to approved university researchers",
        "detail": "Section205B: Australian-university employment, approval under legislative rules, ethics and prescribed public-interest research. Not NGO/company access merely by invitation or affiliation.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-research-narrower",
      "source": "w10-duty-research-role",
      "target": "w10-duty-third-sector-request",
      "label": "university requirement narrows requested independent eligibility",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "w10-duty-s-reset70"
      ],
      "summary": "Explicit text comparison: Reset requested third-sector inclusion;205B university requirement does not grant independent eligibility to every NGO. University collaboration or indirect benefit remains possible.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-research-narrower",
        "source": "w10-duty-research-role",
        "target": "w10-duty-third-sector-request",
        "label": "university requirement narrows requested independent eligibility",
        "detail": "Explicit text comparison: Reset requested third-sector inclusion;205B university requirement does not grant independent eligibility to every NGO. University collaboration or indirect benefit remains possible.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w10-duty-s-reset70"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-minister-research",
      "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "target": "w10-duty-research-role",
      "label": "would establish access and approval scheme through rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections205B-F/240: delegated approval, conditions, fees and revocation; conflict/privacy/security/confidentiality safeguards await rules. Commissioner approvals if rules provide. No completed scheme or awarded data right.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-minister-research",
        "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "target": "w10-duty-research-role",
        "label": "would establish access and approval scheme through rules",
        "detail": "Sections205B-F/240: delegated approval, conditions, fees and revocation; conflict/privacy/security/confidentiality safeguards await rules. Commissioner approvals if rules provide. No completed scheme or awarded data right.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-research-provider",
      "source": "w10-duty-research-role",
      "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
      "label": "could obtain scheme-governed research access and test accounts",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections205B-L: access depends on future rules and eligibility; fictitious accounts limited to authorized research, with interaction constraints and criminal-material exclusions. No actual transfer acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-research-provider",
        "source": "w10-duty-research-role",
        "target": "w10-duty-provider-role",
        "label": "could obtain scheme-governed research access and test accounts",
        "detail": "Sections205B-L: access depends on future rules and eligibility; fictitious accounts limited to authorized research, with interaction constraints and criminal-material exclusions. No actual transfer acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-e-public-draft",
      "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "target": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "label": "announces targeted consultation alongside public release",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-08 – 2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-announcement",
        "w10-duty-s-publication"
      ],
      "summary": "8September2026 public PDF/DOCX release coexists with targeted categories. Does not resolve whether companies received earlier or fuller drafts. Public simplified outlines incomplete; no established redaction or byte-equivalence audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-e-public-draft",
        "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "target": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "label": "announces targeted consultation alongside public release",
        "detail": "8September2026 public PDF/DOCX release coexists with targeted categories. Does not resolve whether companies received earlier or fuller drafts. Public simplified outlines incomplete; no established redaction or byte-equivalence audit.",
        "date": "2026-09-08 – 2026-09-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-announcement",
          "w10-duty-s-publication"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-luminate2021",
      "source": "w11-fund-luminate",
      "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient Carnegie accounts identifyGBP123,330 for2021 Harm Regulation/Social Media. Opening108,357, reported expenditure107,756, closing123,931; no bank receipt or personal payment. Support sustains work that predates this award-year. Financial details: value: 123,330; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-luminate2021",
        "source": "w11-fund-luminate",
        "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
        "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
        "detail": "Recipient Carnegie accounts identifyGBP123,330 for2021 Harm Regulation/Social Media. Opening108,357, reported expenditure107,756, closing123,931; no bank receipt or personal payment. Support sustains work that predates this award-year.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 123,330; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-minderoo2021",
      "source": "w11-fund-minderoo",
      "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "label": "accounts report restricted grant income",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient reportsGBP122,500 income2021, closing90,032.2022 resources expended/transfers54,572 leave35,460;2023 expended/transfer35,460 closes fund. Later movements are not additional income or demonstrated cash transfers. Financial details: value: 122,500; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-minderoo2021",
        "source": "w11-fund-minderoo",
        "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
        "label": "accounts report restricted grant income",
        "detail": "Recipient reportsGBP122,500 income2021, closing90,032.2022 resources expended/transfers54,572 leave35,460;2023 expended/transfer35,460 closes fund. Later movements are not additional income or demonstrated cash transfers.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 122,500; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2021"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-luminate2023",
      "source": "w11-fund-luminate",
      "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
      ],
      "summary": "GBP168,844 income2023 plus1,431 opening balance equals170,275 resources expended/transfer, closingzero. Narrative Luminate/Reset is not a second grant. Note16 opening-year heading anomaly retained. Financial details: value: 168,844; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2023",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-luminate2023",
        "source": "w11-fund-luminate",
        "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
        "label": "accounts report restricted partnership income",
        "detail": "GBP168,844 income2023 plus1,431 opening balance equals170,275 resources expended/transfer, closingzero. Narrative Luminate/Reset is not a second grant. Note16 opening-year heading anomaly retained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 168,844; currency: GBP; kind: reported income; period: 2023"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme",
      "source": "w10-duty-carnegie",
      "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "label": "operates financed duty-model programme",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient legal identity The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, ScottishSC012799/Irish20142957. Work includes bill/amendment drafting, evidence and international advice; restriction constrains purpose, not a disclosed donor clause veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme",
        "source": "w10-duty-carnegie",
        "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
        "label": "operates financed duty-model programme",
        "detail": "Recipient legal identity The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, ScottishSC012799/Irish20142957. Work includes bill/amendment drafting, evidence and international advice; restriction constrains purpose, not a disclosed donor clause veto.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-programme-advice",
      "source": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
      "target": "w11-fund-un-advice",
      "label": "includes identifiable international advice output",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
        "w11-fund-s-un-advice"
      ],
      "summary": "Advice is one named output in programme history. UN adoption and all recommendation contents not audited in this wave.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-programme-advice",
        "source": "w11-fund-carnegie-programme",
        "target": "w11-fund-un-advice",
        "label": "includes identifiable international advice output",
        "detail": "Advice is one named output in programme history. UN adoption and all recommendation contents not audited in this wave.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
          "w11-fund-s-un-advice"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-minderoo-advice",
      "source": "w11-fund-minderoo",
      "target": "w11-fund-un-advice",
      "label": "financial support credited through Frontier Technology initiative",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Support credited22November2021; payment/award dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-un-advice"
      ],
      "summary": "22November2021 announcement credits support for named UN advice. Amount unknown; may apply existing project funding, so no independent extra award counted. No donor-required conclusions or UN adoption established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-minderoo-advice",
        "source": "w11-fund-minderoo",
        "target": "w11-fund-un-advice",
        "label": "financial support credited through Frontier Technology initiative",
        "detail": "22November2021 announcement credits support for named UN advice. Amount unknown; may apply existing project funding, so no independent extra award counted. No donor-required conclusions or UN adoption established.",
        "date": "Support credited22November2021; payment/award dates unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-un-advice"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-carnegie-board",
      "source": "w11-fund-carnegie-board",
      "target": "w10-duty-carnegie",
      "label": "sets strategy and agrees annual budgets",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 report; individual decision records not obtained",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Report delegates execution to management; permanent endowment supplies independent capacity. This is recipient governance, not proof a named trustee decided a particular grant or clause.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-carnegie-board",
        "source": "w11-fund-carnegie-board",
        "target": "w10-duty-carnegie",
        "label": "sets strategy and agrees annual budgets",
        "detail": "Report delegates execution to management; permanent endowment supplies independent capacity. This is recipient governance, not proof a named trustee decided a particular grant or clause.",
        "date": "2023 report; individual decision records not obtained",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-perrin-board",
      "source": "w10-duty-perrin",
      "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-board",
      "label": "listed as trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023 report; effective tenure unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
      ],
      "summary": "2023 report roster establishes role. Does not establish how Perrin voted, personal payments or individual publication approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-perrin-board",
        "source": "w10-duty-perrin",
        "target": "w11-fund-carnegie-board",
        "label": "listed as trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member",
        "detail": "2023 report roster establishes role. Does not establish how Perrin voted, personal payments or individual publication approval.",
        "date": "2023 report; effective tenure unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "person",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-carnegie-network",
      "source": "w10-duty-carnegie",
      "target": "w10-duty-network",
      "label": "reports support for programme succession",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-10-26 – 2023-10-26",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-succession",
        "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
      ],
      "summary": "26October2023 transition says programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through new network; accounts support development. No complete asset/payroll transfer or ownership inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-carnegie-network",
        "source": "w10-duty-carnegie",
        "target": "w10-duty-network",
        "label": "reports support for programme succession",
        "detail": "26October2023 transition says programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through new network; accounts support development. No complete asset/payroll transfer or ownership inferred.",
        "date": "2023-10-26 – 2023-10-26",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-succession",
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-network",
      "source": "reset",
      "target": "w10-duty-network",
      "label": "identified as supporter in dated transition account",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "26October2023 statement; support period not obtained",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-succession"
      ],
      "summary": "Carnegie identifies former partner Reset as supporting new network. Historical brand attribution only; exact contracting entity, amount, host and present2026 funding unknown. No automatic merge with Australian Reset.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-network",
        "source": "reset",
        "target": "w10-duty-network",
        "label": "identified as supporter in dated transition account",
        "detail": "Carnegie identifies former partner Reset as supporting new network. Historical brand attribution only; exact contracting entity, amount, host and present2026 funding unknown. No automatic merge with Australian Reset.",
        "date": "26October2023 statement; support period not obtained",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-succession"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-mannifera-acf",
      "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "target": "w11-fund-acf",
      "label": "uses pooled ACF sub-fund route",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide",
        "w11-fund-s-acf-report"
      ],
      "summary": "Guide describes partnership/sub-fund and collective decisions; ACF independently confirms members give together through it. Specific Reset/HRLC contracting payor and individual approval votes not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-mannifera-acf",
        "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "target": "w11-fund-acf",
        "label": "uses pooled ACF sub-fund route",
        "detail": "Guide describes partnership/sub-fund and collective decisions; ACF independently confirms members give together through it. Specific Reset/HRLC contracting payor and individual approval votes not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide",
          "w11-fund-s-acf-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-mannifera-reset",
      "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "label": "records2024 grant for transparency advocacy",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
      ],
      "summary": "$40,000 Signature Grant, dis/misinformation round. Supports research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry including OSA review, not particular2026 clauses. Currency code, exact award/payment date and cash receipt absent. Financial details: value: 40,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-mannifera-reset",
        "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "label": "records2024 grant for transparency advocacy",
        "detail": "$40,000 Signature Grant, dis/misinformation round. Supports research/advocacy into policy and social-media inquiry including OSA review, not particular2026 clauses. Currency code, exact award/payment date and cash receipt absent.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 40,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-purpose",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w11-fund-reset-advocacy",
      "label": "named grantee for transparency-advocacy purpose",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
      ],
      "summary": "Funded purpose names policy development around misinformation bill/OSA review. No allocation to every Reset activity or proof government adopted conclusions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-purpose",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w11-fund-reset-advocacy",
        "label": "named grantee for transparency-advocacy purpose",
        "detail": "Funded purpose names policy development around misinformation bill/OSA review. No allocation to every Reset activity or proof government adopted conclusions.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-mannifera-hrlc",
      "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "target": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "label": "records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
      ],
      "summary": "$60,000 Signature Grant. Currency code/payment state unknown. Older grants not combined; shared grantor does not establish HRLC-Reset coordination. Financial details: value: 60,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-mannifera-hrlc",
        "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "target": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "label": "records2024 grant for expert alignment and advocacy",
        "detail": "$60,000 Signature Grant. Currency code/payment state unknown. Older grants not combined; shared grantor does not establish HRLC-Reset coordination.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 60,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: published grant award; period: calendar2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-hrlc-purpose",
      "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "target": "w11-fund-alignment-work",
      "label": "named grantee for expert alignment and advocate training",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
      ],
      "summary": "Purpose aligns legal/tech experts on2024 misinformation, OSA and privacy reforms, trains advocates and makes public case. No full participant roster, agreed clause or completed alignment outcome acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-hrlc-purpose",
        "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "target": "w11-fund-alignment-work",
        "label": "named grantee for expert alignment and advocate training",
        "detail": "Purpose aligns legal/tech experts on2024 misinformation, OSA and privacy reforms, trains advocates and makes public case. No full participant roster, agreed clause or completed alignment outcome acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning",
      "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "target": "w11-fund-functioning",
      "label": "reports commissioning misinformation-code research",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Commission identified2023; reportMay2024; exact contract/payment dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions",
        "w11-fund-s-functioning-report"
      ],
      "summary": "McKinnon identifies2023 commission; May2024 report says early2023 approach and describes Reset designing methods. Fee, historic legal party, IP/publication approval and donor-required conclusions unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning",
        "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "target": "w11-fund-functioning",
        "label": "reports commissioning misinformation-code research",
        "detail": "McKinnon identifies2023 commission; May2024 report says early2023 approach and describes Reset designing methods. Fee, historic legal party, IP/publication approval and donor-required conclusions unknown.",
        "date": "Commission identified2023; reportMay2024; exact contract/payment dates unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions",
          "w11-fund-s-functioning-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-functioning",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w11-fund-functioning",
      "label": "publishes research with duty and assessment recommendations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "May2024",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-functioning-report"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendations include considering a duty for misinformation/disinformation, EU-style risk assessment and researcher access. Not a commission of the whole2026 bill or evidence of adoption; experiments not independently audited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-functioning",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w11-fund-functioning",
        "label": "publishes research with duty and assessment recommendations",
        "detail": "Recommendations include considering a duty for misinformation/disinformation, EU-style risk assessment and researcher access. Not a commission of the whole2026 bill or evidence of adoption; experiments not independently audited.",
        "date": "May2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-functioning-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-transparency",
      "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "target": "w11-fund-transparency",
      "label": "reports commissioning comparative transparency research",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Commissions reported across2023-24; exact date for this commission unknown; reportJune2024",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions"
      ],
      "summary": "Commission of this report identified among commissions reported across2023-24. Exact commission date unallocated by source; no disclosed amount, clearance rights or fee schedule. Present privacy-policy entity does not prove historic counterparty.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-mckinnon-transparency",
        "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "target": "w11-fund-transparency",
        "label": "reports commissioning comparative transparency research",
        "detail": "Commission of this report identified among commissions reported across2023-24. Exact commission date unallocated by source; no disclosed amount, clearance rights or fee schedule. Present privacy-policy entity does not prove historic counterparty.",
        "date": "Commissions reported across2023-24; exact date for this commission unknown; reportJune2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-transparency",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w11-fund-transparency",
      "label": "publishes comparison proposing EU and UK mechanisms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2024",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-transparency-report"
      ],
      "summary": "Opening summary proposes Australian risk assessments, annual reports, audits, portals and researcher access across safety/misinformation frameworks. Model transmission is explicit; government uptake not established here.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-transparency",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w11-fund-transparency",
        "label": "publishes comparison proposing EU and UK mechanisms",
        "detail": "Opening summary proposes Australian risk assessments, annual reports, audits, portals and researcher access across safety/misinformation frameworks. Model transmission is explicit; government uptake not established here.",
        "date": "June2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-transparency-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-isf-award",
      "source": "w11-fund-isf",
      "target": "w11-fund-privacy-project",
      "label": "lists phase-two children privacy research award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-isf-award"
      ],
      "summary": "US$219,000 project award,8January2024-7July2025. Research on youth privacy in education technology/targeting and regulator implementation. Award total is not annual paid cash or a duty-of-care commission. Financial details: value: 219,000; currency: USD; kind: published project award; period: 2024-01-08 to2025-07-07",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-isf-award",
        "source": "w11-fund-isf",
        "target": "w11-fund-privacy-project",
        "label": "lists phase-two children privacy research award",
        "detail": "US$219,000 project award,8January2024-7July2025. Research on youth privacy in education technology/targeting and regulator implementation. Award total is not annual paid cash or a duty-of-care commission.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-isf-award"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 219,000; currency: USD; kind: published project award; period: 2024-01-08 to2025-07-07"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-privacy",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w11-fund-privacy-project",
      "label": "named operator of intended phase-two research",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-isf-award"
      ],
      "summary": "Award page names Reset Tech Australia. Described methods and expected results do not establish completed outputs or allocation to unrelated policy work.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-reset-privacy",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w11-fund-privacy-project",
        "label": "named operator of intended phase-two research",
        "detail": "Award page names Reset Tech Australia. Described methods and expected results do not establish completed outputs or allocation to unrelated policy work.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-isf-award"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-e-isf-annual-support",
      "source": "w11-fund-isf",
      "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "label": "annual return reports monetary support to named legal recipient",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w11-fund-s-isf990"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 ScheduleA names Reset Tech Australia Limited US$87,600. Accrual reporting, not cash receipt; no demonstrated instalment reconciliation withUS$219,000 award. Unnamed ScheduleF row not assigned. No merge with global Reset. Financial details: value: 87,600; currency: USD; kind: reported monetary support (accrual); period: 2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-e-isf-annual-support",
        "source": "w11-fund-isf",
        "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "label": "annual return reports monetary support to named legal recipient",
        "detail": "2024 ScheduleA names Reset Tech Australia Limited US$87,600. Accrual reporting, not cash receipt; no demonstrated instalment reconciliation withUS$219,000 award. Unnamed ScheduleF row not assigned. No merge with global Reset.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-isf990"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 87,600; currency: USD; kind: reported monetary support (accrual); period: 2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-operates-network",
      "source": "reset",
      "target": "w10-duty-network",
      "label": "notice identifies operator of website, newsletter and shared inbox",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-osn-notice"
      ],
      "summary": "Explicit Reset operational role and shared systems/records. Informal network has no formal membership; notice federation is not a merger or proof UK company alone contracts for all costs. Tor/VPN advice and limited technical-data retention are stated policies, not verified practice.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-operates-network",
        "source": "reset",
        "target": "w10-duty-network",
        "label": "notice identifies operator of website, newsletter and shared inbox",
        "detail": "Explicit Reset operational role and shared systems/records. Informal network has no formal membership; notice federation is not a merger or proof UK company alone contracts for all costs. Tor/VPN advice and limited technical-data retention are stated policies, not verified practice.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-osn-notice"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-notice-entity",
      "source": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "target": "reset",
      "label": "listed among notice-covered federated legal entities",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-osn-notice",
        "w12-gov-s-uk-overview"
      ],
      "summary": "UK company named in privacy-notice coverage; single-organization treatment is for notice purposes. No equity ownership, cross-border parent instruction or sole OSN contractor established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-notice-entity",
        "source": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
        "target": "reset",
        "label": "listed among notice-covered federated legal entities",
        "detail": "UK company named in privacy-notice coverage; single-organization treatment is for notice purposes. No equity ownership, cross-border parent instruction or sole OSN contractor established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-osn-notice",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-overview"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-board-powers",
      "source": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
      "target": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "label": "holds constitutional management and revocable delegation powers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Articles9-16,20-24: director members manage, appoint, delegate and may retract delegation; committee spending needs authority/budget. Collective majorities, quorum and chair tie-break apply; no identified external donor veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-board-powers",
        "source": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
        "target": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
        "label": "holds constitutional management and revocable delegation powers",
        "detail": "Articles9-16,20-24: director members manage, appoint, delegate and may retract delegation; committee spending needs authority/budget. Collective majorities, quorum and chair tie-break apply; no identified external donor veto.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-scott-board",
      "source": "w12-gov-scott",
      "target": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
      "label": "listed as company director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-directors",
        "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Public register appoints5July2023;2025 constitution makes directors members. Do not project new automatic-membership rule back to2023 or infer a specific individual board vote.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-scott-board",
        "source": "w12-gov-scott",
        "target": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
        "label": "listed as company director",
        "detail": "Public register appoints5July2023;2025 constitution makes directors members. Do not project new automatic-membership rule back to2023 or infer a specific individual board vote.",
        "date": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "person",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-directors",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-wood-board",
      "source": "w12-gov-wood",
      "target": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
      "label": "listed as company director",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-directors",
        "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Public register appoints5July2023; current constitution makes directors members. This is not a measured current ownership percentage or proof every record is up to date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-wood-board",
        "source": "w12-gov-wood",
        "target": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
        "label": "listed as company director",
        "detail": "Public register appoints5July2023; current constitution makes directors members. This is not a measured current ownership percentage or proof every record is up to date.",
        "date": "Director appointment5July2023; membership framework changedMay2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "person",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-directors",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-scott-adoption",
      "source": "w12-gov-scott",
      "target": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "label": "agrees to May2025 replacement constitution as voting member",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-07 – 2025-05-07",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-resolution",
        "w12-gov-s-uk-incorporation"
      ],
      "summary": "Resolution headed7May2025, filed21May. Earlier incorporation names him sole subscriber; adoption does not establish a surviving named reserve under the new text.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-scott-adoption",
        "source": "w12-gov-scott",
        "target": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
        "label": "agrees to May2025 replacement constitution as voting member",
        "detail": "Resolution headed7May2025, filed21May. Earlier incorporation names him sole subscriber; adoption does not establish a surviving named reserve under the new text.",
        "date": "2025-05-07 – 2025-05-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-resolution",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-incorporation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-member-limits",
      "source": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
      "target": "w12-gov-uk-constitutional-limits",
      "label": "must obtain member unanimity for specified entrenched amendments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Article8 covers purposes, asset lock, winding-up and entrenchment; other special written resolutions75%. Directors are members, each has one written vote. These thresholds are not a finding of present50/50 control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-member-limits",
        "source": "w12-gov-uk-director-members",
        "target": "w12-gov-uk-constitutional-limits",
        "label": "must obtain member unanimity for specified entrenched amendments",
        "detail": "Article8 covers purposes, asset lock, winding-up and entrenchment; other special written resolutions75%. Directors are members, each has one written vote. These thresholds are not a finding of present50/50 control.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-australia-group",
      "source": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "label": "expressly lists Australian entity within defined Group Company category",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-articles",
        "w11-fund-s-isf990"
      ],
      "summary": "Schedule1 names Reset Tech Australia Limited among defined companies. Article17 provides conflict-participation exceptions, with other-director exclusion and non-exempt benefit rules. Definition is not parent ownership or proof of an exercised conflicted vote. Australian organization node reused at its named legal-recipient scope; no global merger.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-uk-australia-group",
        "source": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
        "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "label": "expressly lists Australian entity within defined Group Company category",
        "detail": "Schedule1 names Reset Tech Australia Limited among defined companies. Article17 provides conflict-participation exceptions, with other-director exclusion and non-exempt benefit rules. Definition is not parent ownership or proof of an exercised conflicted vote. Australian organization node reused at its named legal-recipient scope; no global merger.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-articles",
          "w11-fund-s-isf990"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-action-receivable",
      "source": "w12-gov-reset-action-ggmbh",
      "target": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
      "label": "UK accounts report year-end amount receivable from named entity",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-uk-accounts"
      ],
      "summary": "GBP1,156 owed to UK company at2024 year end, a balance not observed cash transfer. Legal registration and identity with similarly named constitutional entity unverified. Whole-company amounts are not network budget. Financial details: value: 1,156; currency: GBP; kind: reported receivable stock; period: 2024-12-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-action-receivable",
        "source": "w12-gov-reset-action-ggmbh",
        "target": "w12-gov-reset-uk",
        "label": "UK accounts report year-end amount receivable from named entity",
        "detail": "GBP1,156 owed to UK company at2024 year end, a balance not observed cash transfer. Legal registration and identity with similarly named constitutional entity unverified. Whole-company amounts are not network budget.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-accounts"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,156; currency: GBP; kind: reported receivable stock; period: 2024-12-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-member-selection",
      "source": "w12-gov-mann-members",
      "target": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "label": "published historical process selects projects by staged consensus",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mann-granting"
      ],
      "summary": "EO assesses, up to six members shortlist, Taskforce endorses, voting members reach consensus at Muster. Explicit2023 timetable; not established execution of2024 special round or automatic recusal. Current Board terminology is not backdated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-member-selection",
        "source": "w12-gov-mann-members",
        "target": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "label": "published historical process selects projects by staged consensus",
        "detail": "EO assesses, up to six members shortlist, Taskforce endorses, voting members reach consensus at Muster. Explicit2023 timetable; not established execution of2024 special round or automatic recusal. Current Board terminology is not backdated.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mann-granting"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-acf-trustee",
      "source": "w11-fund-acf",
      "target": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "label": "retains trustee approval over hosted grant recommendations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-acf-faq",
        "w12-gov-s-acf-template",
        "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "General FAQ/template identify Australian Communities Foundation Limited trustee and ABN20 077830347. Donor requests/advisory committees recommend; trustee need not follow preferences and retains authority. Not a signed Mannifera arrangement or identified payor of each grant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-acf-trustee",
        "source": "w11-fund-acf",
        "target": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "label": "retains trustee approval over hosted grant recommendations",
        "detail": "General FAQ/template identify Australian Communities Foundation Limited trustee and ABN20 077830347. Donor requests/advisory committees recommend; trustee need not follow preferences and retains authority. Not a signed Mannifera arrangement or identified payor of each grant.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
            "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-acf-faq",
          "w12-gov-s-acf-template",
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-myer-membership",
      "source": "w12-gov-myer",
      "target": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "label": "reports historical three-year membership award",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-myer2024"
      ],
      "summary": "165,000 approvedFY2022, labelled membership2021-24, dash for commitment fromFY24. Not newFY24 cash. Separate5,000/9,100 entries not added here; current65,000 minimum not retroactively applied. Financial details: value: 165,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported earlier membership award; period: 2021-2024; approvedFY2022",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-myer-membership",
        "source": "w12-gov-myer",
        "target": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "label": "reports historical three-year membership award",
        "detail": "165,000 approvedFY2022, labelled membership2021-24, dash for commitment fromFY24. Not newFY24 cash. Separate5,000/9,100 entries not added here; current65,000 minimum not retroactively applied.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-myer2024"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 165,000; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported earlier membership award; period: 2021-2024; approvedFY2022"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-myer-representation",
      "source": "w12-gov-myer",
      "target": "w12-gov-mann-members",
      "label": "names foundation representative as Mannifera board member",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-myer2024"
      ],
      "summary": "FY24 report names Jemima Myer representative and board member. No proof of her specific HRLC/Reset vote, veto, appointment right or current tenure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-myer-representation",
        "source": "w12-gov-myer",
        "target": "w12-gov-mann-members",
        "label": "names foundation representative as Mannifera board member",
        "detail": "FY24 report names Jemima Myer representative and board member. No proof of her specific HRLC/Reset vote, veto, appointment right or current tenure.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
            "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-myer2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-hrlc-partner",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "label": "grantor names HRLC partner in funded transparency advocacy",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Account of special2024 round; exact publication/implementation dates absent",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mann-round"
      ],
      "summary": "EO round account explicitly names HRLC and Digital Rights Watch as Reset partners. Stronger than common-donor inference; does not identify joint report authorship, complete coalition roster or endorsement of every recommendation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-hrlc-partner",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "label": "grantor names HRLC partner in funded transparency advocacy",
        "detail": "EO round account explicitly names HRLC and Digital Rights Watch as Reset partners. Stronger than common-donor inference; does not identify joint report authorship, complete coalition roster or endorsement of every recommendation.",
        "date": "Account of special2024 round; exact publication/implementation dates absent",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mann-round"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-drw-partner",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w6-ref-drw",
      "label": "grantor names Digital Rights Watch partner in transparency advocacy",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Account of special2024 round; exact implementation dates absent",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mann-round"
      ],
      "summary": "Names a specific partnership in Reset grant purpose/account; not a blanket shared platform or proof that all prior/future positions coincide.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-drw-partner",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w6-ref-drw",
        "label": "grantor names Digital Rights Watch partner in transparency advocacy",
        "detail": "Names a specific partnership in Reset grant purpose/account; not a blanket shared platform or proof that all prior/future positions coincide.",
        "date": "Account of special2024 round; exact implementation dates absent",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mann-round"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-mann-rights-first",
      "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
      "target": "w12-gov-rights-first",
      "label": "publication acknowledges grant support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report dated4October2024; award/payment timing unspecified",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
      ],
      "summary": "Acknowledgment establishes support for output; no grant number/amount or allocation of the entire60,000 award. Do not infer donor endorsement or editorial approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-mann-rights-first",
        "source": "w11-fund-mannifera",
        "target": "w12-gov-rights-first",
        "label": "publication acknowledges grant support",
        "detail": "Acknowledgment establishes support for output; no grant number/amount or allocation of the entire60,000 award. Do not infer donor endorsement or editorial approval.",
        "date": "Report dated4October2024; award/payment timing unspecified",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-mejia-authorship",
      "source": "w12-gov-mejia",
      "target": "w12-gov-rights-first",
      "label": "credited as report author",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-10-04 – 2024-10-04",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
      ],
      "summary": "Report distinguishes author views from HRLC, affiliates and supporters. Assistance/attendance acknowledgments are not an endorsement register.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-mejia-authorship",
        "source": "w12-gov-mejia",
        "target": "w12-gov-rights-first",
        "label": "credited as report author",
        "detail": "Report distinguishes author views from HRLC, affiliates and supporters. Assistance/attendance acknowledgments are not an endorsement register.",
        "date": "2024-10-04 – 2024-10-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-hrlc-launch",
      "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "target": "w12-gov-rights-first",
      "label": "launches related institutional regulatory recommendations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-10-07 – 2024-10-07",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-hrlc-launch",
        "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
      ],
      "summary": "7October launch advocates independent regulator, duty, rights assessment and penalties. Institutional advocacy is distinct from attributing every report line to donor/consultees; proposals not government adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-hrlc-launch",
        "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "target": "w12-gov-rights-first",
        "label": "launches related institutional regulatory recommendations",
        "detail": "7October launch advocates independent regulator, duty, rights assessment and penalties. Institutional advocacy is distinct from attributing every report line to donor/consultees; proposals not government adoption.",
        "date": "2024-10-07 – 2024-10-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-hrlc-launch",
          "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-hrlc-parliament",
      "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "target": "w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
      "label": "reports taking framework to Parliament and government",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Displayed8October2024; exact meeting date not independently established",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament"
      ],
      "summary": "Displayed8October2024 account identifies Mejia-Canales representing HRLC. No independent meeting minutes or accepted wording; URL year differs.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-hrlc-parliament",
        "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "target": "w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
        "label": "reports taking framework to Parliament and government",
        "detail": "Displayed8October2024 account identifies Mejia-Canales representing HRLC. No independent meeting minutes or accepted wording; URL year differs.",
        "date": "Displayed8October2024; exact meeting date not independently established",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-author-parliament",
      "source": "w12-gov-mejia",
      "target": "w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
      "label": "named representative in HRLC engagement account",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament"
      ],
      "summary": "Attributed representation, not formal government advisory appointment or evidence of decision authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-author-parliament",
        "source": "w12-gov-mejia",
        "target": "w12-gov-hrlc-engagement",
        "label": "named representative in HRLC engagement account",
        "detail": "Attributed representation, not formal government advisory appointment or evidence of decision authority.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "person",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-trust",
      "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "target": "w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
      "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
        "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust-abr"
      ],
      "summary": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-trust",
        "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "target": "w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
        "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
        "detail": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust-abr"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-research",
      "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "target": "w12-gov-research-centre",
      "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
        "w12-gov-s-research-abr-history",
        "w12-gov-s-research-abr-current"
      ],
      "summary": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-research",
        "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "target": "w12-gov-research-centre",
        "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
        "detail": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
          "w12-gov-s-research-abr-history",
          "w12-gov-s-research-abr-current"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-charitable",
      "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "target": "w12-gov-charitable-foundation",
      "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
        "w12-gov-s-charitable-abr"
      ],
      "summary": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-entity-charitable",
        "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "target": "w12-gov-charitable-foundation",
        "label": "funding page identifies distinct entity within organization",
        "detail": "Group listing is not a contract signature, ownership percentage or allocation of a Reset commission. Historical entity names and current aliases remain distinct.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
            "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
          "w12-gov-s-charitable-abr"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-trust-research-funding",
      "source": "w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
      "target": "w12-gov-research-centre",
      "label": "both entity reports record one FY2024 intra-group donation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust2024",
        "w12-gov-s-research2024"
      ],
      "summary": "19,530,300 reported by trust and Research Centre as same donation, not two awards, Reset fee or complete cash reconciliation. Dollar code unspecified in inspected passages; centre also supplies services at cost. Financial details: value: 19,530,300; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported intragroup donation; period: FY2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-trust-research-funding",
        "source": "w12-gov-mckinnon-trust",
        "target": "w12-gov-research-centre",
        "label": "both entity reports record one FY2024 intra-group donation",
        "detail": "19,530,300 reported by trust and Research Centre as same donation, not two awards, Reset fee or complete cash reconciliation. Dollar code unspecified in inspected passages; centre also supplies services at cost.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust2024",
          "w12-gov-s-research2024"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 19,530,300; currency: unspecified ($); kind: reported intragroup donation; period: FY2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-committee-oversight",
      "source": "w12-gov-research-committee",
      "target": "w12-gov-research-centre",
      "label": "oversees application of research funds and publication/dissemination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-research2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical report gives general Research Committee mandate. Membership, appointment rights, thresholds and any Reset-specific decision/clearance remain not obtained. One centre member reported, identity undisclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-committee-oversight",
        "source": "w12-gov-research-committee",
        "target": "w12-gov-research-centre",
        "label": "oversees application of research funds and publication/dissemination",
        "detail": "Historical report gives general Research Committee mandate. Membership, appointment rights, thresholds and any Reset-specific decision/clearance remain not obtained. One centre member reported, identity undisclosed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-research2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-briefing",
      "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
      "target": "w12-gov-april-briefing",
      "label": "briefing acknowledges support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "BriefingApril2024",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
      ],
      "summary": "Amount/form unknown. Not automatically one of the two separate named commissions or a fresh additional payment. Recipient retains errors/omissions responsibility; attendance not endorsement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-mckinnon-briefing",
        "source": "w11-fund-mckinnon",
        "target": "w12-gov-april-briefing",
        "label": "briefing acknowledges support",
        "detail": "Amount/form unknown. Not automatically one of the two separate named commissions or a fresh additional payment. Recipient retains errors/omissions responsibility; attendance not endorsement.",
        "date": "BriefingApril2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-convening",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w12-gov-march-roundtable",
      "label": "briefing reports convening academic and civil-society experts",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2024",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
      ],
      "summary": "Twenty experts, March2024, Chatham House Rule; observed account of convening, not a signed common position. No participant roster or all-to-all collaboration edges fabricated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-reset-convening",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w12-gov-march-roundtable",
        "label": "briefing reports convening academic and civil-society experts",
        "detail": "Twenty experts, March2024, Chatham House Rule; observed account of convening, not a signed common position. No participant roster or all-to-all collaboration edges fabricated.",
        "date": "March2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-e-convening-output",
      "source": "w12-gov-march-roundtable",
      "target": "w12-gov-april-briefing",
      "label": "discussion informs published regulatory recommendations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March discussion;April2024 briefing",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
      ],
      "summary": "April briefing translates discussion while disclaiming attendance as endorsement. No proof every participant approved final wording or that government accepted it.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-e-convening-output",
        "source": "w12-gov-march-roundtable",
        "target": "w12-gov-april-briefing",
        "label": "discussion informs published regulatory recommendations",
        "detail": "April briefing translates discussion while disclaiming attendance as endorsement. No proof every participant approved final wording or that government accepted it.",
        "date": "March discussion;April2024 briefing",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-network-feb",
      "source": "w10-duty-network",
      "target": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
      "label": "submitted identified illegal-harms consultation response",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "February2024 internal document date",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
      ],
      "summary": "Internal date February2024; consultation openingNovember2023 and later listing date do not date the response. Exact day not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-network-feb",
        "source": "w10-duty-network",
        "target": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
        "label": "submitted identified illegal-harms consultation response",
        "detail": "Internal date February2024; consultation openingNovember2023 and later listing date do not date the response. Exact day not established.",
        "date": "February2024 internal document date",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-feb-inference",
      "source": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
      "target": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
      "label": "proposed contextual civil interpretation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF25-26: offense-sensitive argument, including contrasting examples. Do not generalize to a ban on all speech without benefit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-feb-inference",
        "source": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
        "target": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
        "label": "proposed contextual civil interpretation",
        "detail": "PDF25-26: offense-sensitive argument, including contrasting examples. Do not generalize to a ban on all speech without benefit.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-woods-inference",
      "source": "w10-duty-woods",
      "target": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
      "label": "publicly argued contextual civil approach",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-woods-civil"
      ],
      "summary": "Named article15February2024 under Burden of Proof in a Civil Regime; intellectual contribution, not regulatory appointment or sole authorship of network response.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-woods-inference",
        "source": "w10-duty-woods",
        "target": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
        "label": "publicly argued contextual civil approach",
        "detail": "Named article15February2024 under Burden of Proof in a Civil Regime; intellectual contribution, not regulatory appointment or sole authorship of network response.",
        "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-woods-civil"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-ofcom-declines-inference",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
      "label": "declined proposed interpretive departure",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-ofcom-inference",
        "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
      ],
      "summary": "Volume3 2.19/fn11 identifies OSAN25-26;2.20-21 retains reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements and context-sensitive judgment, citing expression costs. It agrees criminal beyond-reasonable-doubt is not the test; this is no court judgment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-ofcom-declines-inference",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w13-disp-civil-inference",
        "label": "declined proposed interpretive departure",
        "detail": "Volume3 2.19/fn11 identifies OSAN25-26;2.20-21 retains reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements and context-sensitive judgment, citing expression costs. It agrees criminal beyond-reasonable-doubt is not the test; this is no court judgment.",
        "date": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-inference",
          "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-feb-search",
      "source": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
      "target": "w13-disp-search-risk",
      "label": "raised mismatch in risk discussion and search measures",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF97 identifies thumbnails/click-through and direct/indirect harmful routes. Exact proposal context retained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-feb-search",
        "source": "w13-disp-osan-feb",
        "target": "w13-disp-search-risk",
        "label": "raised mismatch in risk discussion and search measures",
        "detail": "PDF97 identifies thumbnails/click-through and direct/indirect harmful routes. Exact proposal context retained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-feb"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-ofcom-search-amendment",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w13-disp-search-risk",
      "label": "reports amending risk register while retaining statutory limit",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-ofcom-search"
      ],
      "summary": "Annex1 A1.9.9-10/fn486-487 credits OSAN concern and reports amended24.13 plus risks24.10-14. Search content remains results/first interaction, excluding subsequent interactions. Final register not independently diffed; no new unlimited downstream liability.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-ofcom-search-amendment",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w13-disp-search-risk",
        "label": "reports amending risk register while retaining statutory limit",
        "detail": "Annex1 A1.9.9-10/fn486-487 credits OSAN concern and reports amended24.13 plus risks24.10-14. Search content remains results/first interaction, excluding subsequent interactions. Final register not independently diffed; no new unlimited downstream liability.",
        "date": "2024-12-16 – 2024-12-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-search"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-network-july",
      "source": "w10-duty-network",
      "target": "w13-disp-osan-july",
      "label": "published named children-consultation response",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July2024 internal document date",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-osan-july"
      ],
      "summary": "Cover names Woods/Walsh;July2024 document date. Issue8 is differentiated design/assurance advocacy, not uncomplicated universal identification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-network-july",
        "source": "w10-duty-network",
        "target": "w13-disp-osan-july",
        "label": "published named children-consultation response",
        "detail": "Cover names Woods/Walsh;July2024 document date. Issue8 is differentiated design/assurance advocacy, not uncomplicated universal identification.",
        "date": "July2024 internal document date",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-july"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-woods-july",
      "source": "w10-duty-woods",
      "target": "w13-disp-osan-july",
      "label": "named as co-author",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July2024 response",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-osan-july"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-woods-july",
        "source": "w10-duty-woods",
        "target": "w13-disp-osan-july",
        "label": "named as co-author",
        "detail": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
        "date": "July2024 response",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-july"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-walsh-july",
      "source": "w13-disp-maeve-walsh",
      "target": "w13-disp-osan-july",
      "label": "named as co-author",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July2024 response",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-osan-july"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-walsh-july",
        "source": "w13-disp-maeve-walsh",
        "target": "w13-disp-osan-july",
        "label": "named as co-author",
        "detail": "PDF1 identifies this author. No appointment, regulator approval right or exact accepted-edit authorship follows.",
        "date": "July2024 response",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-july"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-ofcom-age-clarification",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
      "label": "published clarified risk-assessment assumptions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk"
      ],
      "summary": "8.170-8.171 PDF36-37: self-declaration/TOS minimum insufficient; without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely presence/ages. Described as minor drafting changes, not a general new ID duty.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-ofcom-age-clarification",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
        "label": "published clarified risk-assessment assumptions",
        "detail": "8.170-8.171 PDF36-37: self-declaration/TOS minimum insufficient; without HEAA enforcement, conservatively assess likely presence/ages. Described as minor drafting changes, not a general new ID duty.",
        "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-osan-credited-feedback",
      "source": "w10-duty-network",
      "target": "w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
      "label": "Ofcom credits network among contributing civil-society feedback",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Clarification24April2025; attribution published15May2025",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-slsc-report",
        "w13-disp-s-slsc-date",
        "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk"
      ],
      "summary": "SLSC25th Report23 records Ofcom collective attribution including OSAN and denies preferential weighting. Exact proposed clause not identified;July inspected section lacks exact formulation. Report24 records dissatisfaction;26 declines adjudication.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-osan-credited-feedback",
        "source": "w10-duty-network",
        "target": "w13-disp-child-risk-ages",
        "label": "Ofcom credits network among contributing civil-society feedback",
        "detail": "SLSC25th Report23 records Ofcom collective attribution including OSAN and denies preferential weighting. Exact proposed clause not identified;July inspected section lacks exact formulation. Report24 records dissatisfaction;26 declines adjudication.",
        "date": "Clarification24April2025; attribution published15May2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-slsc-report",
          "w13-disp-s-slsc-date",
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-submission",
      "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "target": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
      "label": "issued review submission",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document date5July2024",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
      ],
      "summary": "Document dated5July2024. Exact receipt day not established; publication on departmental host is not government endorsement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-submission",
        "source": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "target": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
        "label": "issued review submission",
        "detail": "Document dated5July2024. Exact receipt day not established; publication on departmental host is not government endorsement.",
        "date": "Document date5July2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-reset-endorsement",
      "source": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
      "target": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
      "label": "expressly recommends government adopt Reset risk-based model",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "5July2024 document",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-reset-endorsement",
        "source": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
        "target": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
        "label": "expressly recommends government adopt Reset risk-based model",
        "detail": "Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.",
        "date": "5July2024 document",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-reset-model-attribution",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
      "label": "HRLC explicitly attributes five-pillar model to Reset",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient advocacy text names Reset and its Green Paper. This edge establishes attributed origin in HRLC submission, not new reading of the complete original or exclusive intellectual ancestry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-reset-model-attribution",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
        "label": "HRLC explicitly attributes five-pillar model to Reset",
        "detail": "Recipient advocacy text names Reset and its Green Paper. This edge establishes attributed origin in HRLC submission, not new reading of the complete original or exclusive intellectual ancestry.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-taxonomy",
      "source": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "expressly adopts typology as harm framework",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
      ],
      "summary": "Section4.3 PDF9/fn15-18. HRLC use only; external original awaits separate integration. Do not invent an edge to statutory adoption or assume taxonomy itself dictates a ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-taxonomy",
        "source": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "expressly adopts typology as harm framework",
        "detail": "Section4.3 PDF9/fn15-18. HRLC use only; external original awaits separate integration. Do not invent an edge to statutory adoption or assume taxonomy itself dictates a ban.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-commitment-review",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-commitment",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "ministerial announcement expressly grounds direction in received review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Speech13November2024;release14November2024;review published4February2025",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-rowland-speech",
        "w13-disp-s-rowland-release",
        "w10-duty-s-review",
        "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
      ],
      "summary": "Speech13November2024 names recently received review and international alignment; release14November follows. Stable review node represents later published updated text, not identity of all wording withOctober delivery. No NGO/funder decision attribution in announcement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-commitment-review",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-commitment",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "ministerial announcement expressly grounds direction in received review",
        "detail": "Speech13November2024 names recently received review and international alignment; release14November follows. Stable review node represents later published updated text, not identity of all wording withOctober delivery. No NGO/funder decision attribution in announcement.",
        "date": "Speech13November2024;release14November2024;review published4February2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-rowland-speech",
          "w13-disp-s-rowland-release",
          "w10-duty-s-review",
          "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-hrlc",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-briefing",
      "target": "w11-fund-hrlc",
      "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
      ],
      "summary": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-hrlc",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-briefing",
        "target": "w11-fund-hrlc",
        "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
        "detail": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
        "date": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-reset",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-briefing",
      "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
      ],
      "summary": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-brief-awareness-reset",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-briefing",
        "target": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "label": "official briefing records public advocacy in media summary",
        "detail": "Document2 PDF14-15 records HRLC DSA proposal andOctober coverage involving HRLC/Reset. Edited and SES-cleared26November2024, after13November commitment; not predecision ministerial reading or receipt of specific submission155.",
        "date": "Brief edited/cleared26November2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec4",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "supports review recommendation4: overarching duty",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Government responsep4 accepts overarching policy architecture. This is a disposition of reviewer recommendation, not full HRLC/Reset package acceptance or enactment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec4",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "supports review recommendation4: overarching duty",
        "detail": "Government responsep4 accepts overarching policy architecture. This is a disposition of reviewer recommendation, not full HRLC/Reset package acceptance or enactment.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec7",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "does not support recommendation7: automatic highest tier",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Responsep5 rejects automatic highest tier above10% population coverage; p4 favors proportionate risk wherever present. Ten percent measures population coverage, not a penalty formula. Not an individually addressed NGO rejection.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec7",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "does not support recommendation7: automatic highest tier",
        "detail": "Responsep5 rejects automatic highest tier above10% population coverage; p4 favors proportionate risk wherever present. Ten percent measures population coverage, not a penalty formula. Not an individually addressed NGO rejection.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec9",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "supports recommendation9 in principle with altered rule-maker",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Responsep5 support in principle; p4 describes government-made rules with parliamentary scrutiny instead of eSafety mandatory codes. Qualified implementation choice, not total rejection or exact NGO clause adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec9",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "supports recommendation9 in principle with altered rule-maker",
        "detail": "Responsep5 support in principle; p4 describes government-made rules with parliamentary scrutiny instead of eSafety mandatory codes. Qualified implementation choice, not total rejection or exact NGO clause adoption.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec13",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "supports recommendation13 researcher access in principle",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Responsep6 leaves safeguarded authorized-researcher implementation open. Not an NGO access award, vendor selection or payment. Later university boundary is separately compared.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec13",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "supports recommendation13 researcher access in principle",
        "detail": "Responsep6 leaves safeguarded authorized-researcher implementation open. Not an NGO access award, vendor selection or payment. Later university boundary is separately compared.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec25",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "supports recommendation25: accessible internal complaints",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Responsep8 supports accessible internal mechanisms. No claim that this adopts every Rights-First explanation or restoration right.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec25",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "supports recommendation25: accessible internal complaints",
        "detail": "Responsep8 supports accessible internal mechanisms. No claim that this adopts every Rights-First explanation or restoration right.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec26",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "notes recommendation26: digital Ombuds scheme",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Responsep9 says Note; p7 initially prioritizes internal dispute resolution. Note preserves further consideration and must not be relabeled rejected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-government-rec26",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "notes recommendation26: digital Ombuds scheme",
        "detail": "Responsep9 says Note; p7 initially prioritizes internal dispute resolution. Note preserves further consideration and must not be relabeled rejected.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-civil-access",
      "source": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
      "target": "w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
      "label": "requests access for vetted researchers and civil-society organizations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
      ],
      "summary": "Section5.1.4 PDF11 requests broader direct eligibility than later205B. Do not convert advocacy into granted access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-hrlc-civil-access",
        "source": "w13-disp-hrlc155",
        "target": "w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
        "label": "requests access for vetted researchers and civil-society organizations",
        "detail": "Section5.1.4 PDF11 requests broader direct eligibility than later205B. Do not convert advocacy into granted access.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-draft-narrows-hrlc-access",
      "source": "w10-duty-research-role",
      "target": "w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
      "label": "proposed university eligibility is narrower than HRLC direct-access request",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "inferred",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-hrlc155",
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Comparison:205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approval/ethics/public-interest requirements;205C delegates safeguards. No inferred motive, formal HRLC-specific rejection or bar on university collaboration. Existing draft/research role reused.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-draft-narrows-hrlc-access",
        "source": "w10-duty-research-role",
        "target": "w13-disp-hrlc-civil-research",
        "label": "proposed university eligibility is narrower than HRLC direct-access request",
        "detail": "Comparison:205B requires Australian-university employment plus prospective approval/ethics/public-interest requirements;205C delegates safeguards. No inferred motive, formal HRLC-specific rejection or bar on university collaboration. Existing draft/research role reused.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "inferred",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155",
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-rights-safeguards",
      "source": "w12-gov-rights-first",
      "target": "w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
      "label": "sets out reasons, remedy and review safeguards",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF12/printed22-23 andPDF15/printed28-29. Read alongside report regulatory proposals; no donor editorial approval implied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-rights-safeguards",
        "source": "w12-gov-rights-first",
        "target": "w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
        "label": "sets out reasons, remedy and review safeguards",
        "detail": "PDF12/printed22-23 andPDF15/printed28-29. Read alongside report regulatory proposals; no donor editorial approval implied.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-e-draft-safeguard-comparison",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
      "label": "inspected clauses do not enact full proposed rights framework",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "inferred",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
      ],
      "summary": "26F complaint processes apply to classes designated by eSafety with instrument-set requirements;25H weighs privacy. These clauses do not themselves establish universal explanation/restoration. Scoped text comparison, not identified government rejection or claim whole draft lacks safeguards.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-e-draft-safeguard-comparison",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w13-disp-rights-safeguards",
        "label": "inspected clauses do not enact full proposed rights framework",
        "detail": "26F complaint processes apply to classes designated by eSafety with instrument-set requirements;25H weighs privacy. These clauses do not themselves establish universal explanation/restoration. Scoped text comparison, not identified government rejection or claim whole draft lacks safeguards.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "inferred",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w12-gov-s-rights-first"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-published",
      "source": "wef",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "publishes coalition typology",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-08-04 – 2023-08-04",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-landing",
        "w14-tax-s-original"
      ],
      "summary": "Landing dates publication4August2023 and identifies Global Coalition for Digital Safety output. No contract, selection vote or exact final editorial approval established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-published",
        "source": "wef",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "publishes coalition typology",
        "detail": "Landing dates publication4August2023 and identifies Global Coalition for Digital Safety output. No contract, selection vote or exact final editorial approval established.",
        "date": "2023-08-04 – 2023-08-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
            "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-landing",
          "w14-tax-s-original"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-hildreth-cochair",
      "source": "w14-tax-hildreth",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-resolver"
      ],
      "summary": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-hildreth-cochair",
        "source": "w14-tax-hildreth",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
        "detail": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
        "date": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-resolver"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-inman-cochair",
      "source": "inman-grant",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-resolver"
      ],
      "summary": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-inman-cochair",
        "source": "inman-grant",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "participant reports co-chairing compilation workstream",
        "detail": "Resolver24August2023 opening identifies co-chairs Crisp founder and Australian eSafety Commissioner. Participation is not a legislative veto, procurement award or typology finance. Current branding does not settle2023 contracting entity.",
        "date": "Reported24August2023; exact appointment/tenure unestablished",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-resolver"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-hanna-drafting",
      "source": "w14-tax-hanna",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "biography reports drafting-committee participation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-hanna"
      ],
      "summary": "Current SWGfL Recent Publications names2023 typology committee role. No voting threshold, particular definition or final editorial clearance identified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-hanna-drafting",
        "source": "w14-tax-hanna",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "biography reports drafting-committee participation",
        "detail": "Current SWGfL Recent Publications names2023 typology committee role. No voting threshold, particular definition or final editorial clearance identified.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-hanna"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-hildreth-foreword",
      "source": "w14-tax-hildreth",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-original"
      ],
      "summary": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-hildreth-foreword",
        "source": "w14-tax-hildreth",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
        "detail": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
        "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-original"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-inman-foreword",
      "source": "inman-grant",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-original"
      ],
      "summary": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-inman-foreword",
        "source": "inman-grant",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
        "detail": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
        "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-original"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-dobrygowski-foreword",
      "source": "w14-tax-dobrygowski",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-original"
      ],
      "summary": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-dobrygowski-foreword",
        "source": "w14-tax-dobrygowski",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
        "detail": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
        "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-original"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-bantourakis-foreword",
      "source": "w14-tax-bantourakis",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-original"
      ],
      "summary": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-bantourakis-foreword",
        "source": "w14-tax-bantourakis",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "credited as foreword signatory",
        "detail": "Original indexedp3 names this signatory. This distinct authorship contribution is not full main-text authorship, funding or final sign-off authority.",
        "date": "August2023 publication; signing date unestablished",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-original"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-core-lineage",
      "source": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "target": "w14-tax-core4cs",
      "label": "participant account identifies prior research as antecedent",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-resolver"
      ],
      "summary": "Resolver says builds on CO:RE4Cs and follows actual2021 repository link. Earlier original unavailable; no claim all categories copied unchanged or title establishes full prior contents.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-core-lineage",
        "source": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "target": "w14-tax-core4cs",
        "label": "participant account identifies prior research as antecedent",
        "detail": "Resolver says builds on CO:RE4Cs and follows actual2021 repository link. Earlier original unavailable; no claim all categories copied unchanged or title establishes full prior contents.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-resolver"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-official-use",
      "source": "w14-tax-issues2024",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "cites typology for descriptive harm framing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "April2024; exact publication day unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-issues2024"
      ],
      "summary": "April2024 Part3/fn17 andabuse discussionsfn88/93. Predates HRLCJuly submission, establishing separate official citation route, not causal independence from all advocates or legislative incorporation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-official-use",
        "source": "w14-tax-issues2024",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "cites typology for descriptive harm framing",
        "detail": "April2024 Part3/fn17 andabuse discussionsfn88/93. Predates HRLCJuly submission, establishing separate official citation route, not causal independence from all advocates or legislative incorporation.",
        "date": "April2024; exact publication day unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-issues2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-guidance-use",
      "source": "w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
      "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
      "label": "explicitly uses typology for educational categories",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "Types of online harms section describes overlapping categories. Current page with lastupdated06/03/2026; initial use date unknown, not a statutory instrument or compulsory compliance matrix.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-guidance-use",
        "source": "w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
        "target": "w13-disp-wef-typology",
        "label": "explicitly uses typology for educational categories",
        "detail": "Types of online harms section describes overlapping categories. Current page with lastupdated06/03/2026; initial use date unknown, not a statutory instrument or compulsory compliance matrix.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-esafety-guidance",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
      "label": "publishes industry Safety by Design guidance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "Educational agency page separate from Commissioner workstream role, official review paper and proposed Australian legal categories. No vendor requirement identified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-esafety-guidance",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w14-tax-esafety-harms-guidance",
        "label": "publishes industry Safety by Design guidance",
        "detail": "Educational agency page separate from Commissioner workstream role, official review paper and proposed Australian legal categories. No vendor requirement identified.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-model-scope",
      "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
      "target": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
      "label": "publishes broader risk model with named international comparators",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "April2024 report; exact publication day unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-reset-green"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed6-7/PDF9 five-pillar table covers existing harms, scams, electoral/publicsecurity, rights, publichealth andenvironmental risks; comparesEU/UK/Canadian approaches. Moment-specific contribution to debate, not a sole WEF derivation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-model-scope",
        "source": "w10-duty-reset-australia",
        "target": "w13-disp-reset-five-pillars",
        "label": "publishes broader risk model with named international comparators",
        "detail": "Printed6-7/PDF9 five-pillar table covers existing harms, scams, electoral/publicsecurity, rights, publichealth andenvironmental risks; comparesEU/UK/Canadian approaches. Moment-specific contribution to debate, not a sole WEF derivation.",
        "date": "April2024 report; exact publication day unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-reset-green"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-review-rec5",
      "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "target": "w14-tax-review-categories",
      "label": "proposes harm families in recommendation5",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Published updated reviewp56, not automatically identical text toOctober delivery. Prior source§5.5 separately cites Reset submission70; HRLC endorsement is not an intervening delivery step.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-review-rec5",
        "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "target": "w14-tax-review-categories",
        "label": "proposes harm families in recommendation5",
        "detail": "Published updated reviewp56, not automatically identical text toOctober delivery. Prior source§5.5 separately cites Reset submission70; HRLC endorsement is not an intervening delivery step.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-review-defers",
      "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "target": "w14-tax-deferred-consolidation",
      "label": "defers broader consolidation to other regimes or future review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed56 adjoining discussion: financial,societal,misinformation harms compatible with duty model but already elsewhere; reform substantial. Not a named WEF rejection or blanket exemption from any Australian regulation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-review-defers",
        "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "target": "w14-tax-deferred-consolidation",
        "label": "defers broader consolidation to other regimes or future review",
        "detail": "Printed56 adjoining discussion: financial,societal,misinformation harms compatible with duty model but already elsewhere; reform substantial. Not a named WEF rejection or blanket exemption from any Australian regulation.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-government-rec5",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w14-tax-review-categories",
      "label": "supports recommendation5 in principle",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF3-6 intent/merit supported with alternatives/further implementation possible. Vulnerable people,crime,publicsafety alongside expression; complementsCriminalCode without altering existing discrimination obligations. Not acceptance of every proposed term.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-government-rec5",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w14-tax-review-categories",
        "label": "supports recommendation5 in principle",
        "detail": "PDF3-6 intent/merit supported with alternatives/further implementation possible. Vulnerable people,crime,publicsafety alongside expression; complementsCriminalCode without altering existing discrimination obligations. Not acceptance of every proposed term.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-draft-initial",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
      "label": "specifies initial harm and child/feature categories",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "25B-D distinguish serious harm, additional child protection andunder16 social-media features. No generic misinformation/democracy label named; not an assurance none could intersect listed conduct or future additions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-draft-initial",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
        "label": "specifies initial harm and child/feature categories",
        "detail": "25B-D distinguish serious harm, additional child protection andunder16 social-media features. No generic misinformation/democracy label named; not an assurance none could intersect listed conduct or future additions.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-minister-additions",
      "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "target": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
      "label": "would add harm or feature categories under differing tests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "25C(2),25D(2),27B require seeking/considering eSafety advice and serious-harm or child-harm potential respectively. Child test does not expressly require seriousness;25G feature power has no express serious-harm threshold in that section. Existing general delegation edges retained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-minister-additions",
        "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "target": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
        "label": "would add harm or feature categories under differing tests",
        "detail": "25C(2),25D(2),27B require seeking/considering eSafety advice and serious-harm or child-harm potential respectively. Child test does not expressly require seriousness;25G feature power has no express serious-harm threshold in that section. Existing general delegation edges retained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-draft-assessment",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w14-tax-draft-risk-scope",
      "label": "would assess foreseeable risks including combined and non-user harms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "25E/26A: named-category absence is insufficient to exhaust assessment scope. Context with existing25Hprivacy/practicability and26(7)private-consenting-adult duty exception; no blanket exclusion of lawful adult speech or all other powers.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-draft-assessment",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w14-tax-draft-risk-scope",
        "label": "would assess foreseeable risks including combined and non-user harms",
        "detail": "25E/26A: named-category absence is insufficient to exhaust assessment scope. Context with existing25Hprivacy/practicability and26(7)private-consenting-adult duty exception; no blanket exclusion of lawful adult speech or all other powers.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-earlier-law",
      "source": "w14-tax-act2021",
      "target": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
      "label": "provides earlier substantive harm-test comparator",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "inferred",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-act2021",
        "w10-duty-s-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "As-made2021sections5-9/106 predate2023 typology. Similar legal concepts need not originate solely in it; comparison does not prove exact drafting lineage or equivalence of every threshold.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-earlier-law",
        "source": "w14-tax-act2021",
        "target": "w14-tax-draft-categories",
        "label": "provides earlier substantive harm-test comparator",
        "detail": "As-made2021sections5-9/106 predate2023 typology. Similar legal concepts need not originate solely in it; comparison does not prove exact drafting lineage or equivalence of every threshold.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "inferred",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-act2021",
          "w10-duty-s-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-e-version-callouts",
      "source": "w14-tax-review-version-brief",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "records post-delivery changes with conflicting summaries",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-foi25247",
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Document1/AttachmentC: request1November after31October delivery, brief cleared8November. Five additions/68 total, four said already in text; later public response says67. Intro daily duty-action penalty differs from itemg/newrec35 $10m company removal-notice maximum. No arithmetic-derived original total or identified deletion; no settled attachment date or signed minister acceptance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-e-version-callouts",
        "source": "w14-tax-review-version-brief",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "records post-delivery changes with conflicting summaries",
        "detail": "Document1/AttachmentC: request1November after31October delivery, brief cleared8November. Five additions/68 total, four said already in text; later public response says67. Intro daily duty-action penalty differs from itemg/newrec35 $10m company removal-notice maximum. No arithmetic-derived original total or identified deletion; no settled attachment date or signed minister acceptance.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-foi25247",
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-group-uk",
      "source": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-uk",
      "label": "registered corporate PSC holds75%+ shares",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notification6April2016; active in inspected register",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Registry notified6April2016. Exact100% and separately listed voting-control rights are not established; company register is not independent beneficial-ownership audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-group-uk",
        "source": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-uk",
        "label": "registered corporate PSC holds75%+ shares",
        "detail": "Registry notified6April2016. Exact100% and separately listed voting-control rights are not established; company register is not independent beneficial-ownership audit.",
        "date": "Notification6April2016; active in inspected register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-ki-group",
      "source": "w15-impl-kroll-international",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
      "label": "recorded historical75%+ shares and voting rights",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notified25May2022;ceased29December2022",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Notified25May2022, ceased29December2022. Distinct exact corporate entity; no inferred price, ultimate owner or equality of notification and economic closing dates.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-ki-group",
        "source": "w15-impl-kroll-international",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
        "label": "recorded historical75%+ shares and voting rights",
        "detail": "Notified25May2022, ceased29December2022. Distinct exact corporate entity; no inferred price, ultimate owner or equality of notification and economic closing dates.",
        "date": "Notified25May2022;ceased29December2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-ka-group",
      "source": "w15-impl-kroll-advisory",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
      "label": "recorded current75%+ shares and voting rights",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notification29December2022; current inspected register",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Notified29December2022 and active in inspected record. Exact share percentage, consideration and legal transfer mechanism unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-ka-group",
        "source": "w15-impl-kroll-advisory",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
        "label": "recorded current75%+ shares and voting rights",
        "detail": "Notified29December2022 and active in inspected record. Exact share percentage, consideration and legal transfer mechanism unestablished.",
        "date": "Notification29December2022; current inspected register",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-group-brand",
      "source": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "label": "privacy policy identifies company trading as Crisp",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "Current company/controller identity, not proof Group signed every historic sale or supplied each government report. Distinguishes brand from UK06442193.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-group-brand",
        "source": "w15-impl-crisp-group",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
        "label": "privacy policy identifies company trading as Crisp",
        "detail": "Current company/controller identity, not proof Group signed every historic sale or supplied each government report. Distinguishes brand from UK06442193.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-hildreth-brand",
      "source": "w14-tax-hildreth",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "label": "named founder in dated participant account",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical2022 announcement and2023 participant account",
      "sources": [
        "w14-tax-s-resolver",
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-acquisition"
      ],
      "summary": "August2023 account identifies Crisp founder;2022 acquisition announcement says Hildreth would join leadership. Founder affiliation is not current shareholding or unilateral definition/contract authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-hildreth-brand",
        "source": "w14-tax-hildreth",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
        "label": "named founder in dated participant account",
        "detail": "August2023 account identifies Crisp founder;2022 acquisition announcement says Hildreth would join leadership. Founder affiliation is not current shareholding or unilateral definition/contract authority.",
        "date": "Historical2022 announcement and2023 participant account",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
            "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-resolver",
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-acquisition"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-brand-alignment",
      "source": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "target": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
      "label": "announces operation under Resolver banner",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Posted19March2024;body20March2024",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-resolver-brand"
      ],
      "summary": "Posted19March/body20March2024. Describes brand unification, not a new share acquisition; registry control chain kept separately.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-brand-alignment",
        "source": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
        "target": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
        "label": "announces operation under Resolver banner",
        "detail": "Posted19March/body20March2024. Describes brand unification, not a new share acquisition; registry control chain kept separately.",
        "date": "Posted19March2024;body20March2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-resolver-brand"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-terms-provider",
      "source": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
      "target": "w15-impl-resolver-inc",
      "label": "served standard terms name provider and applicable affiliates",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Unsigned v3.0 terms dated20August2021 identify ResolverInc/applicable affiliates and customer OrderForm. No proof of supplier legal party to DSIT engagement or exclusive brand ownership.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-terms-provider",
        "source": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
        "target": "w15-impl-resolver-inc",
        "label": "served standard terms name provider and applicable affiliates",
        "detail": "Unsigned v3.0 terms dated20August2021 identify ResolverInc/applicable affiliates and customer OrderForm. No proof of supplier legal party to DSIT engagement or exclusive brand ownership.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-service-instructions",
      "source": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "target": "w15-impl-customer-instructions",
      "label": "describes moderation subject to customer instructions",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy",
        "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Published policy distinguishes processor on customer channels and controller for crisis index; automation, escalation and challenge described. Actual instructions/configuration and lawfulness not audited. Generic terms requireOrderForm/SOW; no DSIT-specific adoption implied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-service-instructions",
        "source": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
        "target": "w15-impl-customer-instructions",
        "label": "describes moderation subject to customer instructions",
        "detail": "Published policy distinguishes processor on customer channels and controller for crisis index; automation, escalation and challenge described. Actual instructions/configuration and lawfulness not audited. Generic terms requireOrderForm/SOW; no DSIT-specific adoption implied.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
            "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy",
          "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-dsit-payment",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-uk",
      "label": "publishes supplier payment for professional services",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-05 – 2025-02-05",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-dsit-payment",
        "w15-impl-s-dsit-publisher",
        "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Data row94 transaction654609:GBP56736,5February2025,Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. CSV supplier-name matched to register; number absent fromCSV. Payment not contract total/net revenue; VAT,invoice period,deliverables unknown. No join to2023 award,WEF,Australia orOSCAR. Financial details: value: 56,736; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 2025-02-05;transaction654609;VATunknown",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-dsit-payment",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-uk",
        "label": "publishes supplier payment for professional services",
        "detail": "Data row94 transaction654609:GBP56736,5February2025,Security&OnlineHarms/NSOIT&TechProgramme. CSV supplier-name matched to register; number absent fromCSV. Payment not contract total/net revenue; VAT,invoice period,deliverables unknown. No join to2023 award,WEF,Australia orOSCAR.",
        "date": "2025-02-05 – 2025-02-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025"
          },
          {
            "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-dsit-payment",
          "w15-impl-s-dsit-publisher",
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 56,736; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 2025-02-05;transaction654609;VATunknown"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-illuminate-partnership",
      "source": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
      "target": "illuminate-tech",
      "label": "announces compliance-service collaboration",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-18 – 2026-03-18",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-illuminate"
      ],
      "summary": "18March2026 supplier account: joint engagement forUKOSA/EUDSA market, Resolver expertise plus IlluminateOSCAR. Not official endorsement, contract award or mandatory vendor selection. Existing Illuminate organization reused; legal-registration identity not newly supplied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-illuminate-partnership",
        "source": "w15-impl-resolver-brand",
        "target": "illuminate-tech",
        "label": "announces compliance-service collaboration",
        "detail": "18March2026 supplier account: joint engagement forUKOSA/EUDSA market, Resolver expertise plus IlluminateOSCAR. Not official endorsement, contract award or mandatory vendor selection. Existing Illuminate organization reused; legal-registration identity not newly supplied.",
        "date": "2026-03-18 – 2026-03-18",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-illuminate"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-illuminate-oscar",
      "source": "illuminate-tech",
      "target": "w15-impl-oscar",
      "label": "announcement identifies tool supplier",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-illuminate"
      ],
      "summary": "OSCAR translates requirements into compliance workflows. Claimed product role; no proprietary-rights instrument, public purchaser or actual deployment inspected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-illuminate-oscar",
        "source": "illuminate-tech",
        "target": "w15-impl-oscar",
        "label": "announcement identifies tool supplier",
        "detail": "OSCAR translates requirements into compliance workflows. Claimed product role; no proprietary-rights instrument, public purchaser or actual deployment inspected.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-illuminate"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-review-licence",
      "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "target": "w15-impl-licensing45",
      "label": "recommends considering licensing as operation condition",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review",
        "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
      ],
      "summary": "Published updated section10.10/printed147 andFOIAttachmentC PDF7 directly matchrec45. Possible enforcement,newsbargaining,ombuds andcost purposes; difficulties acknowledged. Citation toNicholls is not a named commission/drafter. No arithmetic matching from68/67 counts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-review-licence",
        "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "target": "w15-impl-licensing45",
        "label": "recommends considering licensing as operation condition",
        "detail": "Published updated section10.10/printed147 andFOIAttachmentC PDF7 directly matchrec45. Possible enforcement,newsbargaining,ombuds andcost purposes; difficulties acknowledged. Citation toNicholls is not a named commission/drafter. No arithmetic matching from68/67 counts.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review",
          "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-licence-rejected",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w15-impl-licensing45",
      "label": "does not support recommendation45 licensing proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Governmentresponse printed10-11 explicitNot supported. Rejects this proposed permission-to-operate condition, not every other enforcement/restriction mechanism or all future vehicles.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-licence-rejected",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w15-impl-licensing45",
        "label": "does not support recommendation45 licensing proposal",
        "detail": "Governmentresponse printed10-11 explicitNot supported. Rejects this proposed permission-to-operate condition, not every other enforcement/restriction mechanism or all future vehicles.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-government-rec42",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "notes recommendation42 business-disruption powers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed10-11 further consideration; not adoption or automatic rejection.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-government-rec42",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "notes recommendation42 business-disruption powers",
        "detail": "Printed10-11 further consideration; not adoption or automatic rejection.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-government-rec43",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "does not support recommendation43 mandatory local presence",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed10-11 discusses potential trade-obligation conflicts. Distinct from licensing and service-contact point.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-government-rec43",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "does not support recommendation43 mandatory local presence",
        "detail": "Printed10-11 discusses potential trade-obligation conflicts. Distinct from licensing and service-contact point.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-government-rec44",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "label": "supports recommendation44 Australian service contact",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed10-11 contact point support, not mandatory local incorporation/presence or licensing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-government-rec44",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "label": "supports recommendation44 Australian service contact",
        "detail": "Printed10-11 contact point support, not mandatory local incorporation/presence or licensing.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-review-phone",
      "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
      "target": "w15-impl-identification48",
      "label": "proposes phone-at-opening, confidentiality and preservation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Published updated section11.2/printed153-154 distinguishes identifying particular users from collecting information on account opening. Privacy/security constraints acknowledged; specific underlying drafter not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-review-phone",
        "source": "w10-duty-review2025",
        "target": "w15-impl-identification48",
        "label": "proposes phone-at-opening, confidentiality and preservation",
        "detail": "Published updated section11.2/printed153-154 distinguishes identifying particular users from collecting information on account opening. Privacy/security constraints acknowledged; specific underlying drafter not established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-government-phone",
      "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
      "target": "w15-impl-identification48",
      "label": "supports recommendation48 in principle",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w13-disp-s-au-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Printed11-13 supports intent/merit with further proportionality and rights consideration. Does not establish acceptance of every mechanism, enacted duty or deployment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-government-phone",
        "source": "w13-disp-au-response",
        "target": "w15-impl-identification48",
        "label": "supports recommendation48 in principle",
        "detail": "Printed11-13 supports intent/merit with further proportionality and rights consideration. Does not establish acceptance of every mechanism, enacted duty or deployment.",
        "date": "2026-04-14 – 2026-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-au-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-draft-phone-comparison",
      "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "target": "w15-impl-identification48",
      "label": "inspected amendments do not expressly implement phone proposal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "inferred",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "w10-duty-s-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Full working reader keyword checks plus Schedule2 items52-57/Part13 review: end-user division regrouped and198-205 replaced. No express phone-at-signup, preservation-notice or general user-tipoff prohibition found there. Other laws/future instruments/parallel age-enforcement bill not exhaustively audited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-draft-phone-comparison",
        "source": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "target": "w15-impl-identification48",
        "label": "inspected amendments do not expressly implement phone proposal",
        "detail": "Full working reader keyword checks plus Schedule2 items52-57/Part13 review: end-user division regrouped and198-205 replaced. No express phone-at-signup, preservation-notice or general user-tipoff prohibition found there. Other laws/future instruments/parallel age-enforcement bill not exhaustively audited.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "inferred",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w10-duty-s-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-dsit-unit",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "label": "identifies department operational team",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy",
        "w15-impl-s-oversight-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Official notice identifies controller and response describes departmental unit; not a distinct incorporated organization.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-dsit-unit",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "label": "identifies department operational team",
        "detail": "Official notice identifies controller and response describes departmental unit; not a distinct incorporated organization.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy",
          "w15-impl-s-oversight-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-minister-remit",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit-ministers",
      "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "label": "government says ministers agree and review remit",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-minister-scope",
        "w15-impl-s-remit-review"
      ],
      "summary": "Public-safety/national-security focus; selection of high-risk subjects described. Exact task-order or referral approval not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-minister-remit",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit-ministers",
        "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "label": "government says ministers agree and review remit",
        "detail": "Public-safety/national-security focus; selection of high-risk subjects described. Exact task-order or referral approval not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-minister-scope",
          "w15-impl-s-remit-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-draft-policy",
      "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "target": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
      "label": "disclosed draft describes operating and escalation rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "FOI-associated copy DRAFT throughout; final adoption and applicability to particular contractor unestablished. This is an instruction instrument, not evidence every action complied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-draft-policy",
        "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "target": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
        "label": "disclosed draft describes operating and escalation rules",
        "detail": "FOI-associated copy DRAFT throughout; final adoption and applicability to particular contractor unestablished. This is an instruction instrument, not evidence every action complied.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-partner-directions",
      "source": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
      "target": "w15-impl-nsoit-partners",
      "label": "would require buyer-agreed instructions and methods",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "Draft3.5-3.6: documented instructions, sources/search terms/task scope, onboarding and continuing assurance. Collection/retention/privacy/surveillance limits, political and journalistic-origin no-flag exclusions remain part of draft.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-partner-directions",
        "source": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
        "target": "w15-impl-nsoit-partners",
        "label": "would require buyer-agreed instructions and methods",
        "detail": "Draft3.5-3.6: documented instructions, sources/search terms/task scope, onboarding and continuing assurance. Collection/retention/privacy/surveillance limits, political and journalistic-origin no-flag exclusions remain part of draft.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-draft-escalation",
      "source": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
      "target": "w15-impl-platform-review",
      "label": "describes authorized referrals with platform discretion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "Draft4.1-4.2 limits flagging to ministerial remit and potential terms breaches; exact threshold/approval partially redacted. Sensitive-origin exclusions apply; no automatic removal or known authorizer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-draft-escalation",
        "source": "w15-impl-nsoit-protocol",
        "target": "w15-impl-platform-review",
        "label": "describes authorized referrals with platform discretion",
        "detail": "Draft4.1-4.2 limits flagging to ministerial remit and potential terms breaches; exact threshold/approval partially redacted. Sensitive-origin exclusions apply; no automatic removal or known authorizer.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-crisp-output",
      "source": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
      "label": "ICO confirms supplier-produced report was held",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure"
      ],
      "summary": "Request concerns week beginning24June2024. Disclosure adjudicator inspected full report. Legal signer, exact reportdate, keywords and2025payment match unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-crisp-output",
        "source": "w15-impl-crisp-brand",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
        "label": "ICO confirms supplier-produced report was held",
        "detail": "Request concerns week beginning24June2024. Disclosure adjudicator inspected full report. Legal signer, exact reportdate, keywords and2025payment match unestablished.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-nsoit-report",
      "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
      "label": "department held and partly disclosed report",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Request period week beginning24June2024; partial disclosure24October2025",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure"
      ],
      "summary": "ICO recounts DSIT holding one report and24October2025 partial release during complaint. Statement that other reports deleted under retention policy is department account, not independent deletion audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-nsoit-report",
        "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
        "label": "department held and partly disclosed report",
        "detail": "ICO recounts DSIT holding one report and24October2025 partial release during complaint. Statement that other reports deleted under retention policy is department account, not independent deletion audit.",
        "date": "Request period week beginning24June2024; partial disclosure24October2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-lawful-referrals",
      "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "target": "w15-impl-platform-review",
      "label": "testimony describes lawful-content warnings and review requests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Testimony14April2026 about earlier and continuing operations, not exact incident dates",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-nsoit-oral",
        "w15-impl-s-trusted-flagger"
      ],
      "summary": "14April2026 testimonyQ29-31: Southport lawful-but-harmful narratives, early warnings before platform appearance, own-terms review. Platforms retain stated action decision. No proven foreign-state source, Crisp role or observed removals in this example. Trusted access is not statutory DSA designation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-lawful-referrals",
        "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "target": "w15-impl-platform-review",
        "label": "testimony describes lawful-content warnings and review requests",
        "detail": "14April2026 testimonyQ29-31: Southport lawful-but-harmful narratives, early warnings before platform appearance, own-terms review. Platforms retain stated action decision. No proven foreign-state source, Crisp role or observed removals in this example. Trusted access is not statutory DSA designation.",
        "date": "Testimony14April2026 about earlier and continuing operations, not exact incident dates",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-oral",
          "w15-impl-s-trusted-flagger"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-ico-decision",
      "source": "w7-impl-ico",
      "target": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
      "label": "upholds remaining national-security redactions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-11-11 – 2025-11-11",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure"
      ],
      "summary": "11November2025 decision after independent inspection and partial release. June2024 referral count10 also disclosed; counts are referrals not removals. Appeal route exists. Ruling on disclosure, not operating legality or all-content review.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-ico-decision",
        "source": "w7-impl-ico",
        "target": "w15-impl-crisp-report2024",
        "label": "upholds remaining national-security redactions",
        "detail": "11November2025 decision after independent inspection and partial release. June2024 referral count10 also disclosed; counts are referrals not removals. Appeal route exists. Ruling on disclosure, not operating legality or all-content review.",
        "date": "2025-11-11 – 2025-11-11",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-gsn-appointed",
      "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
      "label": "current privacy notice names analysis contractor",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Appointment reported; fee, contract and start date unknown. No financial amount, exclusivity or replacement of Crisp established. April2024 page date is not contractor appointment date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-gsn-appointed",
        "source": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
        "label": "current privacy notice names analysis contractor",
        "detail": "Appointment reported; fee, contract and start date unknown. No financial amount, exclusivity or replacement of Crisp established. April2024 page date is not contractor appointment date.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-oversight-request",
      "source": "w15-impl-science-committee",
      "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "label": "recommends statutory footing and intelligence-committee oversight",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July2025 report",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-oversight-request"
      ],
      "summary": "July2025 report60-62 recommends institutional change. Not proof implemented; existing parliamentary questioning and disclosure review remain distinct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-oversight-request",
        "source": "w15-impl-science-committee",
        "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "label": "recommends statutory footing and intelligence-committee oversight",
        "detail": "July2025 report60-62 recommends institutional change. Not proof implemented; existing parliamentary questioning and disclosure review remain distinct.",
        "date": "July2025 report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-oversight-request"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-e-oversight-answer",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w15-impl-science-committee",
      "label": "defends existing review channels without committing to requested change",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
      "sources": [
        "w15-impl-s-oversight-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Reply to62 cites ministerial/parliamentary oversight, privacy notices, FOI and subject access. No commitment to requested statutory/ISC reform in inspected reply; no absence-of-all-review inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-e-oversight-answer",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w15-impl-science-committee",
        "label": "defends existing review channels without committing to requested change",
        "detail": "Reply to62 cites ministerial/parliamentary oversight, privacy notices, FOI and subject access. No commitment to requested statutory/ISC reform in inspected reply; no absence-of-all-review inference.",
        "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-oversight-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-barrett-gsn",
      "source": "w16-supp-barrett",
      "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
      "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notification24June2021;active in inspected record",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Current PSC band, notification24June2021. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-barrett-gsn",
        "source": "w16-supp-barrett",
        "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
        "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
        "detail": "Current PSC band, notification24June2021. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
        "date": "Notification24June2021;active in inspected record",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-king-gsn",
      "source": "w16-supp-king",
      "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
      "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notification28October2020;active in inspected record",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc"
      ],
      "summary": "Current PSC band, notification28October2020. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-king-gsn",
        "source": "w16-supp-king",
        "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
        "label": "register reports more than25% through50% shares and votes",
        "detail": "Current PSC band, notification28October2020. Not exact50%,family relationship,joint agreement or proof of specific operational instructions. RichardBarrett historical cessation does not confer current control.",
        "date": "Notification28October2020;active in inspected record",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-gsn-payment",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
      "label": "publishes payment to named analysis supplier",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-12 – 2025-09-12",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-gsn-payment",
        "w16-supp-s-gsn-register",
        "w16-supp-s-roles2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Original CSV data row107 records GBP118,000 on12September2025, transaction719926, for consultancy in the SOH Information Threats and Security Programme. Contract/project/expenditure-type cells are blank; supplier identity is a name match, not a company number in the CSV. VAT basis, service period and invoice scope remain unknown. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or handover date. Financial details: value: 118,000; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 12September2025;transaction719926;VAT/serviceperiodunknown",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-gsn-payment",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w15-impl-gsn",
        "label": "publishes payment to named analysis supplier",
        "detail": "Original CSV data row107 records GBP118,000 on12September2025, transaction719926, for consultancy in the SOH Information Threats and Security Programme. Contract/project/expenditure-type cells are blank; supplier identity is a name match, not a company number in the CSV. VAT basis, service period and invoice scope remain unknown. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or handover date.",
        "date": "2025-09-12 – 2025-09-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-payment",
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-register",
          "w16-supp-s-roles2026"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 118,000; currency: GBP; kind: published departmental payment; period: 12September2025;transaction719926;VAT/serviceperiodunknown"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-gsn-analysis",
      "source": "w15-impl-gsn",
      "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
      "label": "ministerial answer identifies narrative-analysis function",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Answer27January2026;activitystart/endunknown",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-roles2026"
      ],
      "summary": "The27January2026 answer assigns GSN analysis of misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security. The answer, not misspelled names in the question, anchors attribution. No contract period, effectiveness or feed into CDDP is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-gsn-analysis",
        "source": "w15-impl-gsn",
        "target": "w15-impl-nsoit",
        "label": "ministerial answer identifies narrative-analysis function",
        "detail": "The27January2026 answer assigns GSN analysis of misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security. The answer, not misspelled names in the question, anchors attribution. No contract period, effectiveness or feed into CDDP is inferred.",
        "date": "Answer27January2026;activitystart/endunknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-roles2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-faculty-platform",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "ministerial answer identifies platform development function",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Official answer27January2026",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-roles2026",
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "The27January2026 answer names Faculty Science; the earlier disclosed order at PDF114 identifies Faculty Science Limited08873131. This is an official role account, not an acceptance audit. The inaccessible later cover with a different registration is not merged or used to infer replacement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-faculty-platform",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "label": "ministerial answer identifies platform development function",
        "detail": "The27January2026 answer names Faculty Science; the earlier disclosed order at PDF114 identifies Faculty Science Limited08873131. This is an official role account, not an acceptance audit. The inaccessible later cover with a different registration is not merged or used to infer replacement.",
        "date": "Official answer27January2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-roles2026",
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-tender-platform",
      "source": "w16-supp-procurement26087",
      "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "specifies development,hosting andmaintenance procurement",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-procurement2023"
      ],
      "summary": "September2023requirementsforHMGusers,prototypes andAWSmanagement. Indicative500000-920000budget,one-year/six-monthextension/breakterms aretenderstates,notaward/spend;19applications andproposedfiveassessment notwinningresult. Conflictingstart/enddates,BEISbranding andplaceholders retained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-tender-platform",
        "source": "w16-supp-procurement26087",
        "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "label": "specifies development,hosting andmaintenance procurement",
        "detail": "September2023requirementsforHMGusers,prototypes andAWSmanagement. Indicative500000-920000budget,one-year/six-monthextension/breakterms aretenderstates,notaward/spend;19applications andproposedfiveassessment notwinningresult. Conflictingstart/enddates,BEISbranding andplaceholders retained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-procurement2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-government-priorities",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "tender assigns government team technical priorities and testing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-procurement2023"
      ],
      "summary": "The DSIT product manager owns sprint priorities and user research; its programme manager leads strategy; analysts test as expert users. A prioritised backlog, government sprint goals and quarterly workshops are proposed working arrangements, not verified practice or supplier authority over policy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-government-priorities",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "label": "tender assigns government team technical priorities and testing",
        "detail": "The DSIT product manager owns sprint priorities and user research; its programme manager leads strategy; analysts test as expert users. A prioritised backlog, government sprint goals and quarterly workshops are proposed working arrangements, not verified practice or supplier authority over policy.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-procurement2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-faculty-incumbency",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "target": "w16-supp-procurement26087",
      "label": "procurement names incumbent in extendedAlpha",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-procurement2023",
        "w16-supp-s-roles2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Tender namesFaculty andMarch2024currentcontractend, alongsideOctober2023lateststart. DatedJanuary2026answerstillnamesFaculty;proposedtransition doesnotproveactualreplacement or thisawardresult.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-faculty-incumbency",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "target": "w16-supp-procurement26087",
        "label": "procurement names incumbent in extendedAlpha",
        "detail": "Tender namesFaculty andMarch2024currentcontractend, alongsideOctober2023lateststart. DatedJanuary2026answerstillnamesFaculty;proposedtransition doesnotproveactualreplacement or thisawardresult.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-procurement2023",
          "w16-supp-s-roles2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-business-case",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "business case proposes cross-government data-sharing capacity",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "October2021 businesscase",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "October2021 PDF1-2 SharedOutcomesFundcase,SROSarahConnolly,Discovery/Deliveryphases,misinformation/disinformation/manipulativebehaviour. Namedplan,not validatedperformance. Participatingdepartments/valuefields unreadable/redacted,notreconstructed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-business-case",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "label": "business case proposes cross-government data-sharing capacity",
        "detail": "October2021 PDF1-2 SharedOutcomesFundcase,SROSarahConnolly,Discovery/Deliveryphases,misinformation/disinformation/manipulativebehaviour. Namedplan,not validatedperformance. Participatingdepartments/valuefields unreadable/redacted,notreconstructed.",
        "date": "October2021 businesscase",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-dsit-variation",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
      "label": "disclosed variation names department asbuyer",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF101-102:SecretaryofStateforDSIT andFacultyScience. Dated16August2023/effective17March2023,expiry31March2024. Visiblecopy signature/name/title/datefields uncompleted withoutblackredaction;executionunestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-dsit-variation",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
        "label": "disclosed variation names department asbuyer",
        "detail": "PDF101-102:SecretaryofStateforDSIT andFacultyScience. Dated16August2023/effective17March2023,expiry31March2024. Visiblecopy signature/name/title/datefields uncompleted withoutblackredaction;executionunestablished.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-variation-cap",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
      "target": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "label": "specifies capped fee for additional services",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF101-102 maximumGBP510000excludingVAT,monthlyarrears;printed revisedcontracttotalGBP2373873 isseparate,not an additionalcashamount. Neither executedpayment nor combinedprogrammebudget established. Financial details: value: 510,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed variation maximum excludingVAT;executionunestablished; period: Dated16August2023;effective17March2023;expiry31March2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-variation-cap",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
        "target": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "label": "specifies capped fee for additional services",
        "detail": "PDF101-102 maximumGBP510000excludingVAT,monthlyarrears;printed revisedcontracttotalGBP2373873 isseparate,not an additionalcashamount. Neither executedpayment nor combinedprogrammebudget established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 510,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed variation maximum excludingVAT;executionunestablished; period: Dated16August2023;effective17March2023;expiry31March2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-ip-variation",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
      "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
      "label": "varies ownership and licensing across two call-offs",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF101-102 and AppendixC110-112 align this call-off with G-Cloud12 effective11April2022, retrospectively and prospectively. New IP and specially written software shall be supplier-owned and licensed, not assigned. This changes the stated allocation; it does not establish that earlier ownership necessarily remained unchanged.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-ip-variation",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty102548",
        "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
        "label": "varies ownership and licensing across two call-offs",
        "detail": "PDF101-102 and AppendixC110-112 align this call-off with G-Cloud12 effective11April2022, retrospectively and prospectively. New IP and specially written software shall be supplier-owned and licensed, not assigned. This changes the stated allocation; it does not establish that earlier ownership necessarily remained unchanged.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-supplier-ip",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
      "label": "variation allocates new IP and software ownership to supplier",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "AppendixC1 says the new IP/software shall be owned by the supplier, not assigned to the buyer, subject to a perpetual licence. This differs from technical direction. Execution is not established from the uncompleted visible copy; no absolute supplier veto is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-supplier-ip",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
        "label": "variation allocates new IP and software ownership to supplier",
        "detail": "AppendixC1 says the new IP/software shall be owned by the supplier, not assigned to the buyer, subject to a perpetual licence. This differs from technical direction. Execution is not established from the uncompleted visible copy; no absolute supplier veto is inferred.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-buyer-licence",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
      "label": "variation provides perpetual buyer licence with misuse obligations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "AppendixC1-7 provides a buyer licence and authorised third-party use. The buyer must investigate evidenced misuse, use reasonable endeavours to secure correction and terminate the applicable sublicense for sustained breach, subject to procurement rules. These are terms, not observed exercises.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-buyer-licence",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
        "label": "variation provides perpetual buyer licence with misuse obligations",
        "detail": "AppendixC1-7 provides a buyer licence and authorised third-party use. The buyer must investigate evidenced misuse, use reasonable endeavours to secure correction and terminate the applicable sublicense for sustained breach, subject to procurement rules. These are terms, not observed exercises.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-authorise-maintainers",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
      "label": "variation permits buyer to authorise third-party services",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "AppendixC2,4-5 allows maintenance, hosting, development and adaptation for the buyer without a direct licence or other agreement with Faculty. It does not prove any replacement contractor was appointed or that practical switching costs were low.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-authorise-maintainers",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
        "label": "variation permits buyer to authorise third-party services",
        "detail": "AppendixC2,4-5 allows maintenance, hosting, development and adaptation for the buyer without a direct licence or other agreement with Faculty. It does not prove any replacement contractor was appointed or that practical switching costs were low.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-maintainer-limits",
      "source": "w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
      "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
      "label": "permitted use serves buyer with commercial restrictions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "AppendixC4-5 permits use, adaptation and modification for buyer services. Third parties cannot exploit the IP for unrelated commercial benefit or build a competing commercial product from it. Permissions and limits are not proof of actual deployment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-maintainer-limits",
        "source": "w16-supp-authorised-maintainers",
        "target": "w16-supp-licensed-ip",
        "label": "permitted use serves buyer with commercial restrictions",
        "detail": "AppendixC4-5 permits use, adaptation and modification for buyer services. Third parties cannot exploit the IP for unrelated commercial benefit or build a competing commercial product from it. Permissions and limits are not proof of actual deployment.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-source-access",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "target": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "label": "variation requires accessible source code and documentation",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "AppendixC7 on PDF111 continues onto112: source code and relevant documentation must be available to the buyer and its contractors in an accessible repository and usable format. The obligation does not prove delivery, completeness, successful maintenance or general public release.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-source-access",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "target": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "label": "variation requires accessible source code and documentation",
        "detail": "AppendixC7 on PDF111 continues onto112: source code and relevant documentation must be available to the buyer and its contractors in an accessible repository and usable format. The obligation does not prove delivery, completeness, successful maintenance or general public release.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-dcms-trail",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "w16-supp-faculty102887",
      "label": "named buyer in separate102887 variation trail",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF135/137 separate from102548. No1dated13December2022statesMVPcompleted30September2022;that contractstatementisnotanindependentacceptanceaudit. No2dated1March2023effective16January.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-dcms-trail",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "w16-supp-faculty102887",
        "label": "named buyer in separate102887 variation trail",
        "detail": "PDF135/137 separate from102548. No1dated13December2022statesMVPcompleted30September2022;that contractstatementisnotanindependentacceptanceaudit. No2dated1March2023effective16January.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-fixed-fee-acceptance",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty102887",
      "target": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "label": "specifies fixed fee payable against delivery and buyer acceptance",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "Variation102887No2 on PDF137 adds GBP400,000 excluding VAT in two GBP200,000 instalments against agreed outputs/functionality. Its printed total1,944,650 is30,000 above1,514,650 plus400,000. This is a visible-record discrepancy, not OCR. Intervening terms remain unknown; no spending aggregate, fraud finding or corrected total is asserted. Financial details: value: 400,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed variation fee excludingVAT;delivery/acceptancecondition; period: Dated1March2023;effective16January2023;paymentnotverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-fixed-fee-acceptance",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty102887",
        "target": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "label": "specifies fixed fee payable against delivery and buyer acceptance",
        "detail": "Variation102887No2 on PDF137 adds GBP400,000 excluding VAT in two GBP200,000 instalments against agreed outputs/functionality. Its printed total1,944,650 is30,000 above1,514,650 plus400,000. This is a visible-record discrepancy, not OCR. Intervening terms remain unknown; no spending aggregate, fraud finding or corrected total is asserted.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 400,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed variation fee excludingVAT;delivery/acceptancecondition; period: Dated1March2023;effective16January2023;paymentnotverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-e-newswhip-contract",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "w16-supp-newswhip",
      "label": "disclosed contract identifies monitoring-tool supplier",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Contract stated28October2022-27October2023;optionalextensionnotverified",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF143 names NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration485016, in contract103186 for real-time social/predictive news intelligence,28October2022-27October2023, with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge, payment, exercised extension or actual CDDP feed/deployment was established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-e-newswhip-contract",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "w16-supp-newswhip",
        "label": "disclosed contract identifies monitoring-tool supplier",
        "detail": "PDF143 names NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration485016, in contract103186 for real-time social/predictive news intelligence,28October2022-27October2023, with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge, payment, exercised extension or actual CDDP feed/deployment was established.",
        "date": "Contract stated28October2022-27October2023;optionalextensionnotverified",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-funding",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "reports member-supported programme funding",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reportingyear 2024; funding interval unspecified.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 report says participation is free and Tech Coalition and members fully fund Lantern. No allocated amount, payment ledger, individual contribution or donor instruction established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-funding",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "label": "reports member-supported programme funding",
        "detail": "2024 report says participation is free and Tech Coalition and members fully fund Lantern. No allocated amount, payment ledger, individual contribution or donor instruction established.",
        "date": "Reportingyear 2024; funding interval unspecified.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-hosting",
      "source": "meta",
      "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "provides hosting in kind, according to reports",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reportingyears 2024/2025; exact interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024",
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Meta supplies ThreatExchange hosting in kind. No monetary valuation, executed hosting rights or editorial veto over individual signals established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-hosting",
        "source": "meta",
        "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "label": "provides hosting in kind, according to reports",
        "detail": "Meta supplies ThreatExchange hosting in kind. No monetary valuation, executed hosting rights or editorial veto over individual signals established.",
        "date": "Reportingyears 2024/2025; exact interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "2024 PDF4;2025 PDF16",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024",
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-admission",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "administers entry, compliance and database access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024",
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Programme gives Tech Coalition application/compliance administration and database-access authority; legal agreement follows acceptance. Executed agreement and individual votes not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-admission",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "label": "administers entry, compliance and database access",
        "detail": "Programme gives Tech Coalition application/compliance administration and database-access authority; legal agreement follows acceptance. Executed agreement and individual votes not obtained.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "2024 PDF5–6;2025 PDF28–29",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024",
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-admin",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
      "label": "maintains taxonomy with participants",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator maintains official tags in collaboration with participants. Shared development process, not a named member veto or proof every proposal adopted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-admin",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
        "label": "maintains taxonomy with participants",
        "detail": "Operator maintains official tags in collaboration with participants. Shared development process, not a named member veto or proof every proposal adopted.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-input",
      "source": "w22-sig-participants",
      "target": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
      "label": "may propose taxonomy updates",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Companies may propose updates; particular proposal/approval records and accepted changes unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-input",
        "source": "w22-sig-participants",
        "target": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
        "label": "may propose taxonomy updates",
        "detail": "Companies may propose updates; particular proposal/approval records and accepted changes unknown.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-rules",
      "source": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
      "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "supplies required investigation labels",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024",
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Uploads need official tag and review/severity context. Taxonomy supports policy investigations, not legal determinations; supplemental tags cannot stand alone. No general political-speech/payments scope inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-taxonomy-rules",
        "source": "w22-sig-taxonomy",
        "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "label": "supplies required investigation labels",
        "detail": "Uploads need official tag and review/severity context. Taxonomy supports policy investigations, not legal determinations; supplemental tags cannot stand alone. No general political-speech/payments scope inferred.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "2024 PDF14,19–21;2025 PDF14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024",
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-own-review",
      "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "target": "w22-sig-participants",
      "label": "requires review and own-policy decisions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Rules require manual review before upload and recipient investigation before own enforcement. Lantern says it does not facilitate automated enforcement based on signals. Safeguards are stated requirements, not independently audited compliance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-own-review",
        "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "target": "w22-sig-participants",
        "label": "requires review and own-policy decisions",
        "detail": "Rules require manual review before upload and recipient investigation before own enforcement. Lantern says it does not facilitate automated enforcement based on signals. Safeguards are stated requirements, not independently audited compliance.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF14,28–29",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-appeal-removal",
      "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "target": "w22-sig-participants",
      "label": "requires recourse, relevant signals and TC notification",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 report requires appeals/recourse, removal of signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notification to Tech Coalition. This is an existing remedy/removal process; downstream recipient notification, reopening and export correction remain unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-appeal-removal",
        "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "target": "w22-sig-participants",
        "label": "requires recourse, relevant signals and TC notification",
        "detail": "2024 report requires appeals/recourse, removal of signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notification to Tech Coalition. This is an existing remedy/removal process; downstream recipient notification, reopening and export correction remain unestablished.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-remove-own",
      "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "target": "w22-sig-participants",
      "label": "limits participant deletion to own uploads",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "2025 report says companies may delete only signals they uploaded. Does not prove no administrator can remove signals. Aggregate removals do not identify error corrections or reinstatements.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-remove-own",
        "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "target": "w22-sig-participants",
        "label": "limits participant deletion to own uploads",
        "detail": "2025 report says companies may delete only signals they uploaded. Does not prove no administrator can remove signals. Aggregate removals do not identify error corrections or reinstatements.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-compliance-consequence",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w22-sig-noncontinuation",
      "label": "reported a participant would not continue",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reportfor 2024 refers to 2025 non-continuation; effective date unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2024"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 report describes unnamed company unable to meet compliance and says it would not continue in 2025; identity and actual revocation date unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-compliance-consequence",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w22-sig-noncontinuation",
        "label": "reported a participant would not continue",
        "detail": "2024 report describes unnamed company unable to meet compliance and says it would not continue in 2025; identity and actual revocation date unknown.",
        "date": "Reportfor 2024 refers to 2025 non-continuation; effective date unverified.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-pilot",
      "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "target": "w22-sig-pilot",
      "label": "reports receive-only financial pilot",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August 2024–first half 2025; exact days unknown. Accountpublished 17 July 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-pilot"
      ],
      "summary": "Reports August 2024–first half 2025 pilot: Cash App,MEGA,Meta,PayPal,Snap,Western Union;1935 signals,108 financial investigations, some ongoing. Investigations/reports are not convictions; full report not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-pilot",
        "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "target": "w22-sig-pilot",
        "label": "reports receive-only financial pilot",
        "detail": "Reports August 2024–first half 2025 pilot: Cash App,MEGA,Meta,PayPal,Snap,Western Union;1935 signals,108 financial investigations, some ongoing. Investigations/reports are not convictions; full report not obtained.",
        "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; exact days unknown. Accountpublished 17 July 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Main article 17 July 2025",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-pilot"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-pilot-cashapp",
      "source": "w22-sig-cashapp",
      "target": "w22-sig-pilot",
      "label": "named as pilot participant",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-pilot"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator identifies Cash App among six; financial participants receive only.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-pilot-cashapp",
        "source": "w22-sig-cashapp",
        "target": "w22-sig-pilot",
        "label": "named as pilot participant",
        "detail": "Operator identifies Cash App among six; financial participants receive only.",
        "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Participant list",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-pilot"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-pilot-paypal",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "w22-sig-pilot",
      "label": "named as pilot participant",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-pilot"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator identifies PayPal among six; no connection to prior itch.io restrictions established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-pilot-paypal",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "w22-sig-pilot",
        "label": "named as pilot participant",
        "detail": "Operator identifies PayPal among six; no connection to prior itch.io restrictions established.",
        "date": "August 2024–first half 2025; enrolment/exit days unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Participant list",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-pilot"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-finance-expansion",
      "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "target": "w22-sig-financial-eligibility",
      "label": "announced worldwide eligibility expansion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Announcement 14 May 2026; individual enrolment dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-expansion"
      ],
      "summary": "14 May 2026 announcement extends individually evaluated eligibility worldwide, prioritizing P2 P payments; receive-only. Eligibility is not actual enrolment of every institution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-finance-expansion",
        "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "target": "w22-sig-financial-eligibility",
        "label": "announced worldwide eligibility expansion",
        "detail": "14 May 2026 announcement extends individually evaluated eligibility worldwide, prioritizing P2 P payments; receive-only. Eligibility is not actual enrolment of every institution.",
        "date": "Announcement 14 May 2026; individual enrolment dates unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Dated main article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-expansion"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-meta-case",
      "source": "meta",
      "target": "w22-sig-case2025",
      "label": "conducted investigation, operator reports",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reportfor 2025; exact investigation dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Police request prompted Meta own investigation and NCMEC report in described child-exploitation case; not direct government membership/upload.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-meta-case",
        "source": "meta",
        "target": "w22-sig-case2025",
        "label": "conducted investigation, operator reports",
        "detail": "Police request prompted Meta own investigation and NCMEC report in described child-exploitation case; not direct government membership/upload.",
        "date": "Reportfor 2025; exact investigation dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-case-signals",
      "source": "w22-sig-case2025",
      "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "generated shared Meta signals, operator reports",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Case timing unknown; reportfor 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Case study says Meta shared signals through Lantern. Private signals and underlying case file not inspected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-case-signals",
        "source": "w22-sig-case2025",
        "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "label": "generated shared Meta signals, operator reports",
        "detail": "Case study says Meta shared signals through Lantern. Private signals and underlying case file not inspected.",
        "date": "Case timing unknown; reportfor 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-block-case",
      "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "informed case investigation, operator reports",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Case timing unknown; reportfor 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Shared signals reportedly informed Block identification of 18 Cash App accounts suspected of CSAM sales/purchases. Operator account, not inspected underlying records.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-block-case",
        "source": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "informed case investigation, operator reports",
        "detail": "Shared signals reportedly informed Block identification of 18 Cash App accounts suspected of CSAM sales/purchases. Operator account, not inspected underlying records.",
        "date": "Case timing unknown; reportfor 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-cashapp-outcome",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w22-sig-cashapp",
      "label": "closed 18 accounts in the reported case",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Exact action dates unknown; reportfor 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Tech Coalition says Block closed 18 Cash App accounts, banned users and reported to authorities in this case. Later arrests attributed to unnamed police confirmation; no independent docket, findings or wrongful-action rate established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-cashapp-outcome",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w22-sig-cashapp",
        "label": "closed 18 accounts in the reported case",
        "detail": "Tech Coalition says Block closed 18 Cash App accounts, banned users and reported to authorities in this case. Later arrests attributed to unnamed police confirmation; no independent docket, findings or wrongful-action rate established.",
        "date": "Exact action dates unknown; reportfor 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w22-sig-case2025",
      "label": "acted on Xbox accounts, operator reports",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Exact action dates unknown; reportfor 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-report2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Same case says Microsoft acted on several Xbox accounts. No exact count/case file; does not establish every participant or Steam took action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w22-sig-case2025",
        "label": "acted on Xbox accounts, operator reports",
        "detail": "Same case says Microsoft acted on several Xbox accounts. No exact count/case file; does not establish every participant or Steam took action.",
        "date": "Exact action dates unknown; reportfor 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-block-use",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
      "label": "reports investigative use through Cash App",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document 10 September 2025; use interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-block"
      ],
      "summary": "Block publication confirms active Cash App participation and investigator use to assess detection/product/risk controls. Does not independently confirm 18-account case; overall NCMEC counts are not Lantern totals.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-block-use",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w22-sig-lantern",
        "label": "reports investigative use through Cash App",
        "detail": "Block publication confirms active Cash App participation and investigator use to assess detection/product/risk controls. Does not independently confirm 18-account case; overall NCMEC counts are not Lantern totals.",
        "date": "Document 10 September 2025; use interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF19 / printed 18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-block"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-block-member",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w22-sig-tc",
      "label": "reports Tech Coalition membership",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document 10 September 2025; membership interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-block"
      ],
      "summary": "Block identifies itself as member; no contribution amount, voting power or approval of specific signal established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-block-member",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w22-sig-tc",
        "label": "reports Tech Coalition membership",
        "detail": "Block identifies itself as member; no contribution amount, voting power or approval of specific signal established.",
        "date": "Document 10 September 2025; membership interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF19 / printed 18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-block"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-icmec-involvement",
      "source": "w22-sig-cashapp",
      "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
      "label": "reports regular involvement in US coalition",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Document 10 September 2025; involvement interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-block"
      ],
      "summary": "Block says Cash App regularly involved in ICMEC-led US coalition. Wording does not establish formal membership/vote or ICMEC control of Lantern.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-icmec-involvement",
        "source": "w22-sig-cashapp",
        "target": "icmec-financial-coalition",
        "label": "reports regular involvement in US coalition",
        "detail": "Block says Cash App regularly involved in ICMEC-led US coalition. Wording does not establish formal membership/vote or ICMEC control of Lantern.",
        "date": "Document 10 September 2025; involvement interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF19 / printed 18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
            "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-block"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-hria-commission",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w22-sig-bsr",
      "label": "commissioned Lantern human-rights assessment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "WorkApril–August 2023; reportNovember 2023; contract dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-bsr2023"
      ],
      "summary": "BSR report identifies commissioned Lantern assessment, workApril–August 2023. Not certification/audit of later outcomes; no fee established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-hria-commission",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w22-sig-bsr",
        "label": "commissioned Lantern human-rights assessment",
        "detail": "BSR report identifies commissioned Lantern assessment, workApril–August 2023. Not certification/audit of later outcomes; no fee established.",
        "date": "WorkApril–August 2023; reportNovember 2023; contract dates unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF2–9,14–20",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-bsr2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-hria-output",
      "source": "w22-sig-bsr",
      "target": "w22-sig-hria2023",
      "label": "published human-rights risk assessment",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "ReportNovember 2023; day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-bsr2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Describes commitments and risks: decontextualized signals, cumulative exclusions and separate-company appeals. Assessed risks are not observed wrongdoing; scope predates financial integration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-hria-output",
        "source": "w22-sig-bsr",
        "target": "w22-sig-hria2023",
        "label": "published human-rights risk assessment",
        "detail": "Describes commitments and risks: decontextualized signals, cumulative exclusions and separate-company appeals. Assessed risks are not observed wrongdoing; scope predates financial integration.",
        "date": "ReportNovember 2023; day unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "PDF19–30",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-bsr2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-hria-response",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w22-sig-hria2023",
      "label": "reported nine recommendations implemented",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Response 7 November 2023; individual implementation dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-hria-response"
      ],
      "summary": "7 November 2023 response says 9 of 19 implemented and 10 pursued/investigated. Operator assertion, not independent verification or proof end-to-end remedy works.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-hria-response",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w22-sig-hria2023",
        "label": "reported nine recommendations implemented",
        "detail": "7 November 2023 response says 9 of 19 implemented and 10 pursued/investigated. Operator assertion, not independent verification or proof end-to-end remedy works.",
        "date": "Response 7 November 2023; individual implementation dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Main article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-hria-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-classifier-workflow",
      "source": "w22-sig-sightengine",
      "target": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "label": "describes supplying classification outputs",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Currentguide observed 9 September 2026; historical version unknown. PUBLICpublished 26 March 2026 citesguideas 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
        "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4"
      ],
      "summary": "Coauthored guide describes scores entering Checkstep workflow; PUBLIC calls example signal sharing. Not shared offender list, universal no-external-processing guarantee or observed customer deployment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-classifier-workflow",
        "source": "w22-sig-sightengine",
        "target": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "label": "describes supplying classification outputs",
        "detail": "Coauthored guide describes scores entering Checkstep workflow; PUBLIC calls example signal sharing. Not shared offender list, universal no-external-processing guarantee or observed customer deployment.",
        "date": "Currentguide observed 9 September 2026; historical version unknown. PUBLICpublished 26 March 2026 citesguideas 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Guide detection/workflow; PUBLIC6.1.1/case 4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
          "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-workflow",
      "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "target": "w22-sig-customer-workflow",
      "label": "documents configurable moderation workflow",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-standard",
        "w22-sig-s-guide-current"
      ],
      "summary": "Content/reference access and metadata feed selected scanners and policy-linked decisions for customer platform. No shared cross-customer restriction register established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-workflow",
        "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "target": "w22-sig-customer-workflow",
        "label": "documents configurable moderation workflow",
        "detail": "Content/reference access and metadata feed selected scanners and policy-linked decisions for customer platform. No shared cross-customer restriction register established.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Sending contents/Access delegation/Receiving Webhooks;guide",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-standard",
          "w22-sig-s-guide-current"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-policy-choice",
      "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "target": "w22-sig-customer-workflow",
      "label": "selects policy configuration in described workflow",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
        "w22-sig-s-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "Model selection and policy/threshold mapping determine actions/review. No actual customer settings, thresholds or acceptance observed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-policy-choice",
        "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "target": "w22-sig-customer-workflow",
        "label": "selects policy configuration in described workflow",
        "detail": "Model selection and policy/threshold mapping determine actions/review. No actual customer settings, thresholds or acceptance observed.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Guide scoring/policy/workflow;Standard policy fields",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
          "w22-sig-s-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-webhook-decisions",
      "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "target": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "label": "can return content and account action instructions",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "decision can remove/restore/keep content down; human author-decision can suspend/terminate/restore accounts, with content removal depending on decision. Customer must implement handler. Capability, not observed enforcement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-webhook-decisions",
        "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "target": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "label": "can return content and account action instructions",
        "detail": "decision can remove/restore/keep content down; human author-decision can suspend/terminate/restore accounts, with content removal depending on decision. Customer must implement handler. Capability, not observed enforcement.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Receiving Webhooks:decision,author-decision",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-appeal-events",
      "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "target": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "label": "can return appeal and restoration events",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "incident-closed includes overturned/upheld; restoration and notification events described. No successful appeal, independent adjudication or correction across unrelated platforms established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-appeal-events",
        "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "target": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "label": "can return appeal and restoration events",
        "detail": "incident-closed includes overturned/upheld; restoration and notification events described. No successful appeal, independent adjudication or correction across unrelated platforms established.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "incident-closed,decision,author-decision",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-checkstep-training",
      "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "target": "w22-sig-checkstep-training",
      "label": "publishes opt-out customer-data ML permission",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms 5.5 permit Customer Data for service ML and treat it as customer instruction, subject to email opt-out. No anonymization condition in clause; actual training, pooling, acceptance/opt-out unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-checkstep-training",
        "source": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "target": "w22-sig-checkstep-training",
        "label": "publishes opt-out customer-data ML permission",
        "detail": "Terms 5.5 permit Customer Data for service ML and treat it as customer instruction, subject to email opt-out. No anonymization condition in clause; actual training, pooling, acceptance/opt-out unknown.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Terms 5.1–5.5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-checkstep-optout",
      "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "target": "w22-sig-checkstep-training",
      "label": "may opt out under published terms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Email opt-out for ML use is published contractual option, not observed customer election or historical integration term.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-checkstep-optout",
        "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "target": "w22-sig-checkstep-training",
        "label": "may opt out under published terms",
        "detail": "Email opt-out for ML use is published contractual option, not observed customer election or historical integration term.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Terms 5.5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-checkstep-controller",
      "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "target": "w22-sig-checkstep",
      "label": "retains controller role under published terms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms 14 identify contracting party as controller,Checkstep processor; instructions/protected subprocessors/referred requests. Termination 30 days is backup-request window, not universal deletion deadline. Executed terms unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-checkstep-controller",
        "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "target": "w22-sig-checkstep",
        "label": "retains controller role under published terms",
        "detail": "Terms 14 identify contracting party as controller,Checkstep processor; instructions/protected subprocessors/referred requests. Termination 30 days is backup-request window, not universal deletion deadline. Executed terms unknown.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "13.3(C),14.1–14.9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-feedback-training",
      "source": "w22-sig-sightengine",
      "target": "w22-sig-feedback",
      "label": "may use voluntarily submitted media for model work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms 9.3 raw-media licence covers voluntary Feedback API submissions for training/testing/development with necessary rights/consents. General-suggestion sentence is distinct; its perpetual/irrevocable adjectives are not imported. Routine scanning or Checkstep forwarding not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-feedback-training",
        "source": "w22-sig-sightengine",
        "target": "w22-sig-feedback",
        "label": "may use voluntarily submitted media for model work",
        "detail": "Terms 9.3 raw-media licence covers voluntary Feedback API submissions for training/testing/development with necessary rights/consents. General-suggestion sentence is distinct; its perpetual/irrevocable adjectives are not imported. Routine scanning or Checkstep forwarding not established.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Terms 9.3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-feedback-controller",
      "source": "w22-sig-sightengine",
      "target": "w22-sig-feedback",
      "label": "acts as independent controller under feedback exception",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa"
      ],
      "summary": "DPA2.3 assigns controller role for Feedback Data with lawful basis/privacy law;4.4 permits perpetual retention subject to policy/law and exempts automatic return/deletion. Does not erase privacy rights or prove actual retention/training.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-feedback-controller",
        "source": "w22-sig-sightengine",
        "target": "w22-sig-feedback",
        "label": "acts as independent controller under feedback exception",
        "detail": "DPA2.3 assigns controller role for Feedback Data with lawful basis/privacy law;4.4 permits perpetual retention subject to policy/law and exempts automatic return/deletion. Does not erase privacy rights or prove actual retention/training.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF3–4 section 2.3;PDF6–7 sections 4.4,5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-e-sightengine-processor",
      "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
      "target": "w22-sig-sightengine",
      "label": "instructs ordinary processing under published DPA",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa",
        "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Ordinary subscriber-data uses processor arrangement, requiring controller authority if subscriber itself processor. Correction/deletion assistance and law limits differ from feedback exception. Particular execution unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-e-sightengine-processor",
        "source": "w22-sig-customer-role",
        "target": "w22-sig-sightengine",
        "label": "instructs ordinary processing under published DPA",
        "detail": "Ordinary subscriber-data uses processor arrangement, requiring controller authority if subscriber itself processor. Correction/deletion assistance and law limits differ from feedback exception. Particular execution unknown.",
        "date": "Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "DPA2.1–2.3,4–5;Terms 4.1–4.6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa",
          "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-terms",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-terms",
      "label": "publishes contracting terms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Block is the contracting company. Gray explanatory annotations are expressly non-operative; this is a current text, not proof of the agreement governing a historical account action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-terms",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-terms",
        "label": "publishes contracting terms",
        "detail": "Block is the contracting company. Gray explanatory annotations are expressly non-operative; this is a current text, not proof of the agreement governing a historical account action.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Opening disclaimer; II revisions; XXIII.8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-incorporates-aup",
      "source": "w23-cash-terms",
      "target": "w23-cash-aup",
      "label": "incorporates acceptable-use policy",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-terms",
        "w23-cash-s-aup"
      ],
      "summary": "XXIII.5 incorporates the AUP. Separate criminal-activity, adult-content-sales and elevated-risk restrictions must not be collapsed into one illegal-content rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-incorporates-aup",
        "source": "w23-cash-terms",
        "target": "w23-cash-aup",
        "label": "incorporates acceptable-use policy",
        "detail": "XXIII.5 incorporates the AUP. Separate criminal-activity, adult-content-sales and elevated-risk restrictions must not be collapsed into one illegal-content rule.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Terms XXIII.5; AUP I",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms",
          "w23-cash-s-aup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-external-rules",
      "source": "w23-cash-aup",
      "target": "w23-cash-external-policies",
      "label": "references bank and card-network policies",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-aup"
      ],
      "summary": "AUP includes businesses Block believes risk violating bank/card-network policies. No particular policy, external instruction or closure decision is identified by that generic reference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-external-rules",
        "source": "w23-cash-aup",
        "target": "w23-cash-external-policies",
        "label": "references bank and card-network policies",
        "detail": "AUP includes businesses Block believes risk violating bank/card-network policies. No particular policy, external instruction or closure decision is identified by that generic reference.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "AUP I: elevated-risk businesses",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-aup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-termination",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-customers",
      "label": "reserves suspension and termination discretion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-terms",
        "w23-cash-s-aup"
      ],
      "summary": "Current XXIII.9 permits account/access suspension or termination at any time for any reason and reasonable notification steps; AUP II permits suspension/termination without notice for reported violations. These provisions do not erase separate regulatory duties or establish actual use in a particular case.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-termination",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-customers",
        "label": "reserves suspension and termination discretion",
        "detail": "Current XXIII.9 permits account/access suspension or termination at any time for any reason and reasonable notification steps; AUP II permits suspension/termination without notice for reported violations. These provisions do not erase separate regulatory duties or establish actual use in a particular case.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Terms XXIII.9; AUP II",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms",
          "w23-cash-s-aup"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-conditional-balance",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-customers",
      "label": "reserves conditional holds and withdrawal access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "VI.1(e)(iii) permits risk-based transfer delays/limits and investigation holds; XXIII.11 makes post-termination withdrawal subject to company discretion and other terms, including pending liabilities/investigation. No universal release deadline, actual forfeiture or confiscation is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-conditional-balance",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-customers",
        "label": "reserves conditional holds and withdrawal access",
        "detail": "VI.1(e)(iii) permits risk-based transfer delays/limits and investigation holds; XXIII.11 makes post-termination withdrawal subject to company discretion and other terms, including pending liabilities/investigation. No universal release deadline, actual forfeiture or confiscation is established.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "VI.1(e)(iii); XXIII.11 operative text, excluding gray annotation",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-legal-process",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-customers",
      "label": "reserves responses to legal process and government requests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "XXIII.3 covers freeze/withhold/remit responses to specified binding legal instruments; VI.1(e)(iii) separately includes government requests. These coexist with discretionary risk holds; not every hold is court-ordered and no specific government instruction is acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-legal-process",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-customers",
        "label": "reserves responses to legal process and government requests",
        "detail": "XXIII.3 covers freeze/withhold/remit responses to specified binding legal instruments; VI.1(e)(iii) separately includes government requests. These coexist with discretionary risk holds; not every hold is court-ordered and no specific government instruction is acquired.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "VI.1(e)(iii); XXIII.3–4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-custody-access",
      "source": "w23-cash-customers",
      "target": "w22-sig-cashapp",
      "label": "must use Cash App to access custodial balances under terms",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "VI.3 says balances are separate from corporate funds and accessed through Cash App, not directly at custodial banks/brokerages. Limited agency/custody arrangement does not prove Block ownership of funds or that a custodial bank directed a closure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-custody-access",
        "source": "w23-cash-customers",
        "target": "w22-sig-cashapp",
        "label": "must use Cash App to access custodial balances under terms",
        "detail": "VI.3 says balances are separate from corporate funds and accessed through Cash App, not directly at custodial banks/brokerages. Limited agency/custody arrangement does not prove Block ownership of funds or that a custodial bank directed a closure.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "VI.3; XXIII.8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-help-route",
      "source": "w22-sig-cashapp",
      "target": "w23-cash-help",
      "label": "publishes Support and eligible-case review route",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-help",
        "w23-cash-s-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Help directs customers to Support, then an eligibility screen and appropriate team; says up to 10 days, without specifying business days. It describes cash-out/pending-deposit routes but cannot establish unconditional withdrawal, actual performance or an external bank-account closure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-help-route",
        "source": "w22-sig-cashapp",
        "target": "w23-cash-help",
        "label": "publishes Support and eligible-case review route",
        "detail": "Help directs customers to Support, then an eligibility screen and appropriate team; says up to 10 days, without specifying business days. It describes cash-out/pending-deposit routes but cannot establish unconditional withdrawal, actual performance or an external bank-account closure.",
        "date": "Current pages observed 9 September 2026. Terms display effective 7 February 2024 and update 26 August 2026; individual clause/acceptance history unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Full closure-help article; compare terms VI.1 and XXIII.11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-help",
          "w23-cash-s-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-cfpb-issued",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb",
      "target": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "label": "entered consent order against Block",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Entered 16 January 2025; stipulation signed 15 January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
        "w23-cash-s-stipulation"
      ],
      "summary": "Final administrative order based on agency findings; Block consented without admitting or denying facts or conclusions except jurisdiction. Not a trial admission or a finding about Lantern.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-cfpb-issued",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb",
        "target": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
        "label": "entered consent order against Block",
        "detail": "Final administrative order based on agency findings; Block consented without admitting or denying facts or conclusions except jurisdiction. Not a trial admission or a finding about Lantern.",
        "date": "Entered 16 January 2025; stipulation signed 15 January 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Order 2–3 and entered footer; stipulation",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
          "w23-cash-s-stipulation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-historical-recourse",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "found inadequate account-restriction recourse",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Findings entered 16 January 2025 concern historical practices described in the order; no common precise interval assigned.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Consent-order findings describe absent or generic restriction notices, little-publicized appeals, slow reconsideration and delayed release even after successful appeal. These are attributed historical agency findings, without Block admissions; no identified Lantern case or current failure rate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-historical-recourse",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "found inadequate account-restriction recourse",
        "detail": "Consent-order findings describe absent or generic restriction notices, little-publicized appeals, slow reconsideration and delayed release even after successful appeal. These are attributed historical agency findings, without Block admissions; no identified Lantern case or current failure rate.",
        "date": "Findings entered 16 January 2025 concern historical practices described in the order; no common precise interval assigned.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "34–36, PDF 21; 55–58, PDF 26–28",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-issuer-disputes",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "label": "disputed characterization and claimed improvements",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published 16 January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-response"
      ],
      "summary": "Block public response characterized issues as historical and disputed the CFPB account while claiming service/protection improvements. Provider counter-account does not independently verify remediation or negate the operative consent order.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-issuer-disputes",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
        "label": "disputed characterization and claimed improvements",
        "detail": "Block public response characterized issues as historical and disputed the CFPB account while claiming service/protection improvements. Provider counter-account does not independently verify remediation or negate the operative consent order.",
        "date": "Published 16 January 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "16 January 2025 response, main body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
            "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-restriction-duty",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "target": "w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
      "label": "requires restriction notice and appeal procedure",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "108(c): written decision/appeal notice within 24 hours, unless prohibited by law enforcement. Frozen-funds carveout applies only to transfer-information limb (c)(iii). 108(d): grant/deny appeal or status-change request within 10 business days of receipt; written decision and denial explanation. No guaranteed restoration or wholesale import of the (c) exception into (d).",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-restriction-duty",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
        "target": "w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
        "label": "requires restriction notice and appeal procedure",
        "detail": "108(c): written decision/appeal notice within 24 hours, unless prohibited by law enforcement. Frozen-funds carveout applies only to transfer-information limb (c)(iii). 108(d): grant/deny appeal or status-change request within 10 business days of receipt; written decision and denial explanation. No guaranteed restoration or wholesale import of the (c) exception into (d).",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "108(c)–(d), PDF 45–47",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-restriction-block",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
      "label": "must implement account-restriction safeguards",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
        "w23-cash-s-help"
      ],
      "summary": "Order requires published web/in-app appeal instructions, notice and timely decisions by Block. The current help page is not the complete measure of the obligation; whether any particular request complied requires its records and applicable modifications.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-restriction-block",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-restriction-procedure",
        "label": "must implement account-restriction safeguards",
        "detail": "Order requires published web/in-app appeal instructions, notice and timely decisions by Block. The current help page is not the complete measure of the obligation; whether any particular request complied requires its records and applicable modifications.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "108(c)–(d); current help article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
          "w23-cash-s-help"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-error-duty",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "target": "w23-cash-error-procedure",
      "label": "requires distinct transfer-error investigation and evidence access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "For a defined Notice of Error: reasonable investigation, results within 3 business days after completion, relied-on-document notice/copies for no/different error, correction within 1 business day and provisional credit within 10 business days if incomplete. The express document right does not automatically cover every closure appeal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-error-duty",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
        "target": "w23-cash-error-procedure",
        "label": "requires distinct transfer-error investigation and evidence access",
        "detail": "For a defined Notice of Error: reasonable investigation, results within 3 business days after completion, relied-on-document notice/copies for no/different error, correction within 1 business day and provisional credit within 10 business days if incomplete. The express document right does not automatically cover every closure appeal.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "3(f), PDF 9–10; 107–108(e), PDF 41–47",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-fraud-controls",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "requires fraud controls including account exclusion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "108(f) requires identifying suspected fraudulent-inducement accounts, preventing their operation and associated individuals returning, complaint tracking and protective procedures. The same order requires restrictions and remedies; no prescribed Lantern supplier or universal cross-platform exclusion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-fraud-controls",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-order",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "requires fraud controls including account exclusion",
        "detail": "108(f) requires identifying suspected fraudulent-inducement accounts, preventing their operation and associated individuals returning, complaint tracking and protective procedures. The same order requires restrictions and remedies; no prescribed Lantern supplier or universal cross-platform exclusion.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "108(f), PDF 48",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-working-groups",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-working-groups",
      "label": "must maintain specified internal oversight roles",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "109 specifies a senior committee and support, fraud/security and EFTA groups with assessment, escalation and resources duties. Required structure, not evidence of actual appointments, meetings or vendor control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-working-groups",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-working-groups",
        "label": "must maintain specified internal oversight roles",
        "detail": "109 specifies a senior committee and support, fraud/security and EFTA groups with assessment, escalation and resources duties. Required structure, not evidence of actual appointments, meetings or vendor control.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "109, PDF 49–52",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-board-cfpb",
      "source": "w23-cash-block-board",
      "target": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
      "label": "has ultimate compliance responsibility",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Board/executives must review relevant plans and submissions and ensure necessary actions/resources; annual sworn Compliance Report must be Board approved. Does not prove the required reports were prepared or accepted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-board-cfpb",
        "source": "w23-cash-block-board",
        "target": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
        "label": "has ultimate compliance responsibility",
        "detail": "Board/executives must review relevant plans and submissions and ensure necessary actions/resources; annual sworn Compliance Report must be Board approved. Does not prove the required reports were prepared or accepted.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "113–116, PDF 54–56",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-compliance-create",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
      "label": "must create and implement within 120 days",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Compliance Plan must set detailed steps, deadlines and Board apprisal. Its 120-day create/implement clock is not an express blanket grace period for every 108 duty. No plan or implementation record acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-compliance-create",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
        "label": "must create and implement within 120 days",
        "detail": "Compliance Plan must set detailed steps, deadlines and Board apprisal. Its 120-day create/implement clock is not an express blanket grace period for every 108 duty. No plan or implementation record acquired.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "110–112, PDF 53–54",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-compliance-inspect",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb",
      "target": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
      "label": "may obtain plan and compliance records on request",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Compliance Plan is furnished on request; original electronic compliance, redress and complaint records must be and produced, with additional reporting/testimony powers. This is not Redress Plan prior non-objection or independent adjudication of every account appeal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-compliance-inspect",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb",
        "target": "w23-cash-compliance-plan",
        "label": "may obtain plan and compliance records on request",
        "detail": "Compliance Plan is furnished on request; original electronic compliance, redress and complaint records must be and produced, with additional reporting/testimony powers. This is not Redress Plan prior non-objection or independent adjudication of every account appeal.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "112; 143–145, PDF 67–69; 150–153, PDF 71",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-redress-review",
      "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-enforcement",
      "target": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
      "label": "reviews for non-objection and may require revision",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Block submits Redress Plan within 120 days; Director/delegate may require revision; Block must revise and resubmit within 15 days of that direction. Block must follow non-objected-to plan, with credit payment/non-credit commencement clock after non-objection and a post-completion report. Actual non-objection and completed distribution report not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-redress-review",
        "source": "w23-cash-cfpb-enforcement",
        "target": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
        "label": "reviews for non-objection and may require revision",
        "detail": "Block submits Redress Plan within 120 days; Director/delegate may require revision; Block must revise and resubmit within 15 days of that direction. Block must follow non-objected-to plan, with credit payment/non-credit commencement clock after non-objection and a post-completion report. Actual non-objection and completed distribution report not obtained.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "119–122, PDF 57–60",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-redress-reserve",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
      "label": "must reserve funds for ordered redress",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "117 requires USD 75 m reserved or in segregated deposit within 10 calendar days; consumer redress capped at USD 120 m. If consumer redress is below USD 75 m, specified shortfall goes to CFPB, with possible further redress/Treasury residue. Neither figure proves cash received by consumers or actual reserve establishment. Financial details: value: 75,000,000; currency: USD; kind: ordered reserve or segregated-deposit obligation; not observed payment; period: Within 10 calendar days of order effective date",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-redress-reserve",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
        "label": "must reserve funds for ordered redress",
        "detail": "117 requires USD 75 m reserved or in segregated deposit within 10 calendar days; consumer redress capped at USD 120 m. If consumer redress is below USD 75 m, specified shortfall goes to CFPB, with possible further redress/Treasury residue. Neither figure proves cash received by consumers or actual reserve establishment.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; conditional duration and written modification provisions. Performance and any later modification unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "117–125, PDF 56–60; 160, PDF 74",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 75,000,000; currency: USD; kind: ordered reserve or segregated-deposit obligation; not observed payment; period: Within 10 calendar days of order effective date"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-penalty-paid",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-cfpb",
      "label": "was ordered to pay a penalty and reports paying it",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order entered 16 January 2025; company reports payment during January 2025, exact day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
        "w23-cash-s-issuer2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Order assessed USD 55 m civil penalty payable to CFPB Civil Penalty Fund within 10 calendar days. Block 2024 Form 10-K reports payment in January 2025. This is one penalty with order and issuer-payment evidence, not two transfers; bank/government receipt not acquired. Financial details: value: 55,000,000; currency: USD; kind: company-reported payment of the same assessed civil penalty; period: January 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-penalty-paid",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-cfpb",
        "label": "was ordered to pay a penalty and reports paying it",
        "detail": "Order assessed USD 55 m civil penalty payable to CFPB Civil Penalty Fund within 10 calendar days. Block 2024 Form 10-K reports payment in January 2025. This is one penalty with order and issuer-payment evidence, not two transfers; bank/government receipt not acquired.",
        "date": "Order entered 16 January 2025; company reports payment during January 2025, exact day unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "126–128, PDF 61; Block 2024 Form 10-K printed 144, lines 3703–3719",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
          "w23-cash-s-issuer2024"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 55,000,000; currency: USD; kind: company-reported payment of the same assessed civil penalty; period: January 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-state-issued",
      "source": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
      "target": "w23-cash-state-order",
      "label": "entered multistate consent instrument with Block",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective 15 January 2025; Colorado signature in fuller copy dated 16 January 2025. No common signing day asserted.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full",
        "w23-cash-s-state-body",
        "w23-cash-s-state-release"
      ],
      "summary": "Public order refers to AML findings in an not obtained November 2023 examination report. Block neither admits nor denies violations; general release/press-summary categories are not a proved catalogue of specific failures. Maine copy has signature/party/allocation differences as unresolved metadata.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-state-issued",
        "source": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
        "target": "w23-cash-state-order",
        "label": "entered multistate consent instrument with Block",
        "detail": "Public order refers to AML findings in an not obtained November 2023 examination report. Block neither admits nor denies violations; general release/press-summary categories are not a proved catalogue of specific failures. Maine copy has signature/party/allocation differences as unresolved metadata.",
        "date": "Effective 15 January 2025; Colorado signature in fuller copy dated 16 January 2025. No common signing day asserted.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Recitals; I; VI.A; Maine PDF 19–22",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
          },
          {
            "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full",
          "w23-cash-s-state-body",
          "w23-cash-s-state-release"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-state-committee",
      "source": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
      "target": "w23-cash-state-exec",
      "label": "act through specified Executive Committee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "Initial committee comprises Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington representatives. It is not the eight examining states, seven enforcement leads or every participating regulator; representation may be replaced under the order.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-state-committee",
        "source": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
        "target": "w23-cash-state-exec",
        "label": "act through specified Executive Committee",
        "detail": "Initial committee comprises Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington representatives. It is not the eight examining states, seven enforcement leads or every participating regulator; representation may be replaced under the order.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.A, PDF 2–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-company-committee",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-company-committee",
      "label": "must appoint company compliance committee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "Relevant-division representatives must meet quarterly and keep minutes. Committee continues until the later of state Executive Committee receipt of validation report or eight quarters, then Block may dissolve it. No actual meeting/dissolution established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-company-committee",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-company-committee",
        "label": "must appoint company compliance committee",
        "detail": "Relevant-division representatives must meet quarterly and keep minutes. Committee continues until the later of state Executive Committee receipt of validation report or eight quarters, then Block may dissolve it. No actual meeting/dissolution established.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.B, PDF 3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-state-board",
      "source": "w23-cash-block-board",
      "target": "w23-cash-state-cap",
      "label": "must formally approve corrective action plan",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "Board or authorized committee has formal CAP approval and ultimate compliance responsibility. CAP is submitted to state Executive Committee; receipt is not an express additional CAP approval requirement. Actual plan and approval not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-state-board",
        "source": "w23-cash-block-board",
        "target": "w23-cash-state-cap",
        "label": "must formally approve corrective action plan",
        "detail": "Board or authorized committee has formal CAP approval and ultimate compliance responsibility. CAP is submitted to state Executive Committee; receipt is not an express additional CAP approval requirement. Actual plan and approval not acquired.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.C; II.D.2, PDF 3–4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-consultant-assess",
      "source": "w23-cash-consultant",
      "target": "w23-cash-state-cap",
      "label": "must assess, prioritize and validate corrections",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "Mandated independent consultant assesses AML adequacy, prioritizes measures for CAP and validates completion. Assessment within nine months; CAP submitted within 90 calendar days after assessment with immediate implementation. Completion/extension provisions do not prove an actual deadline expired. No individual account-closure authority inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-consultant-assess",
        "source": "w23-cash-consultant",
        "target": "w23-cash-state-cap",
        "label": "must assess, prioritize and validate corrections",
        "detail": "Mandated independent consultant assesses AML adequacy, prioritizes measures for CAP and validates completion. Assessment within nine months; CAP submitted within 90 calendar days after assessment with immediate implementation. Completion/extension provisions do not prove an actual deadline expired. No individual account-closure authority inferred.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.D.1–3, PDF 3–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-consultant-access",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-consultant",
      "label": "must provide personnel, vendor and record access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "Company must make relevant personnel, vendors, facilities and records accessible for the required assessment. Role and required access are established; firm identity, engagement price and actual inspections are unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-consultant-access",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-consultant",
        "label": "must provide personnel, vendor and record access",
        "detail": "Company must make relevant personnel, vendors, facilities and records accessible for the required assessment. Role and required access are established; firm identity, engagement price and actual inspections are unknown.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.D.7, PDF 5–6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-consultant-replacement",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-consultant",
      "label": "selects replacement subject to independence and notice",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "II.D.8: company Compliance Management Committee must notify state Executive Committee within 10 calendar days after becoming aware of replacement need. Block must notify that committee within 10 calendar days AFTER making its selection, then engage the replacement within 30 calendar days of selection notification. No 10-day selection deadline is stated. Replacement must be qualified, independent and unaffiliated; no named firm, initial appointment method or express state veto established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-consultant-replacement",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-consultant",
        "label": "selects replacement subject to independence and notice",
        "detail": "II.D.8: company Compliance Management Committee must notify state Executive Committee within 10 calendar days after becoming aware of replacement need. Block must notify that committee within 10 calendar days AFTER making its selection, then engage the replacement within 30 calendar days of selection notification. No 10-day selection deadline is stated. Replacement must be qualified, independent and unaffiliated; no named firm, initial appointment method or express state veto established.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.D.8, PDF 6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-state-report-access",
      "source": "w23-cash-state-exec",
      "target": "w23-cash-consultant",
      "label": "receives reports and may inspect workpapers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "Reports go contemporaneously to Block and committee; committee may request workpapers/work product and ask specified questions. It also receives CAP/company reporting and can request Board Reports. Receipt/inspection rights do not establish state appointment of consultant or formal CAP approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-state-report-access",
        "source": "w23-cash-state-exec",
        "target": "w23-cash-consultant",
        "label": "receives reports and may inspect workpapers",
        "detail": "Reports go contemporaneously to Block and committee; committee may request workpapers/work product and ask specified questions. It also receives CAP/company reporting and can request Board Reports. Receipt/inspection rights do not establish state appointment of consultant or formal CAP approval.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.C.3; II.D.1,3–6, PDF 3–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-state-extensions",
      "source": "w23-cash-state-exec",
      "target": "w23-cash-state-cap",
      "label": "may extend reporting deadlines on good cause",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full"
      ],
      "summary": "II.D.9 allows reporting extensions on reasonable-ground request/good cause. CAP-duration extension instead has consultant review/documentation under II.D.2(c). No actual extension or unconditional state veto over every plan established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-state-extensions",
        "source": "w23-cash-state-exec",
        "target": "w23-cash-state-cap",
        "label": "may extend reporting deadlines on good cause",
        "detail": "II.D.9 allows reporting extensions on reasonable-ground request/good cause. CAP-duration extension instead has consultant review/documentation under II.D.2(c). No actual extension or unconditional state veto over every plan established.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "II.D.2(c), PDF 5; II.D.9, PDF 6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-e-state-obligation",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
      "label": "owes separate penalty and administrative costs",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w23-cash-s-state-full",
        "w23-cash-s-issuer2024"
      ],
      "summary": "USD 80 m settlement comprises USD 79.075 m penalty and USD 925,000 state administrative costs, payable 20 calendar days after payment instructions. Block later expected payment by/about February 2025; no receipt acquired. Costs are neither consultant fees nor consumer redress. Covered-conduct release is conditioned on full payment. Financial details: value: 80,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement obligation; no payment receipt established; period: 20 calendar days after receipt of payment instructions",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-e-state-obligation",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w23-cash-state-regulators",
        "label": "owes separate penalty and administrative costs",
        "detail": "USD 80 m settlement comprises USD 79.075 m penalty and USD 925,000 state administrative costs, payable 20 calendar days after payment instructions. Block later expected payment by/about February 2025; no receipt acquired. Costs are neither consultant fees nor consumer redress. Covered-conduct release is conditioned on full payment.",
        "date": "Order effective 15 January 2025; conditional clocks and written changes. Performance, payment and extensions unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "III.A–B, PDF 6; V.D, PDF 8; Appendices B–C, PDF 21–22; issuer 2024 Form 10-K printed 144",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-full",
          "w23-cash-s-issuer2024"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 80,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement obligation; no payment receipt established; period: 20 calendar days after receipt of payment instructions"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-announced",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-ags",
      "target": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "label": "announced agreed multistate resolution",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Announcement 8 July 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-notice",
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "8 July official announcement identifies 46 AGs, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Published California proposed and Oregon signed-party texts contain substantive terms; neither copy verifies court entry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-announced",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-ags",
        "target": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "label": "announced agreed multistate resolution",
        "detail": "8 July official announcement identifies 46 AGs, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Published California proposed and Oregon signed-party texts contain substantive terms; neither copy verifies court entry.",
        "date": "Announcement 8 July 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "California announcement; CA PDF1,21; OR PDF28–31",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
            "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-notice",
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-assent",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "label": "signed Oregon party assent to agreed terms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Block signature 6 July 2026; Oregon signature 8 July; stipulated effective 8 July; entry unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-or",
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2"
      ],
      "summary": "Block legal officer signs 6 July and Oregon counsel 8 July; court approval line blank. Agreed state pool is USD 45m payable within 30 days, including NAAG allocation. No observed judicial entry, state receipt or additional second consumer-award total.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-assent",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "label": "signed Oregon party assent to agreed terms",
        "detail": "Block legal officer signs 6 July and Oregon counsel 8 July; court approval line blank. Agreed state pool is USD 45m payable within 30 days, including NAAG allocation. No observed judicial entry, state receipt or additional second consumer-award total.",
        "date": "Block signature 6 July 2026; Oregon signature 8 July; stipulated effective 8 July; entry unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "OR PDF28–31; OR46–48 PDF15–16; CA59–60 PDF13; issuer Note16 printed33",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-or",
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-service",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "sets agreed support and escalation duties",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or",
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Live customer support 24h; human phone at least 13.5h including 5–6:30pm Pacific, human chat at least 18h, reasonable waits/callbacks and direct AG complaint contact. Not 24h human telephone service or proof service was delivered.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-service",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "sets agreed support and escalation duties",
        "detail": "Live customer support 24h; human phone at least 13.5h including 5–6:30pm Pacific, human chat at least 18h, reasonable waits/callbacks and direct AG complaint contact. Not 24h human telephone service or proof service was delivered.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA44–46 PDF8–9; OR31–33 PDF9–10; compare CFPB108(a)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-restriction",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "sets agreed restriction-review procedures",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or",
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Literal deadline By June 30, 2026 precedes stipulated effective date. Prompt notice, access information, review and reasonable restoration efforts have appropriateness/legal-prohibition qualifications. Flexible language does not say it replaces CFPB 24h notice/10-business-day appeal rules; breach or intent not inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-restriction",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "sets agreed restriction-review procedures",
        "detail": "Literal deadline By June 30, 2026 precedes stipulated effective date. Prompt notice, access information, review and reasonable restoration efforts have appropriateness/legal-prohibition qualifications. Flexible language does not say it replaces CFPB 24h notice/10-business-day appeal rules; breach or intent not inferred.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA51 PDF10–11; OR38 PDF12–13; CFPB108(c)–(d)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-errors-fraud",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "sets distinct transfer-error and anti-fraud duties",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "Notice-of-Error evidence rights and credit timing have their own trigger, including no required contact with the P2P recipient/law enforcement before investigation. Fraud controls also identify suspected scam accounts and prevent operation/return. Neither universal closure-document access nor a prescribed Lantern supplier follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-errors-fraud",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "sets distinct transfer-error and anti-fraud duties",
        "detail": "Notice-of-Error evidence rights and credit timing have their own trigger, including no required contact with the P2P recipient/law enforcement before investigation. Fraud controls also identify suspected scam accounts and prevent operation/return. Neither universal closure-document access nor a prescribed Lantern supplier follows.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA47–50,52 PDF9–12; OR34–37,39 PDF11–14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-corporate",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w24-ag-july-compliance",
      "label": "agreed to maintain internal compliance oversight",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "Qualified committee, documented compliance management, training and quarterly Board reporting. Annual compliance report must be prepared and committee-approved, available to state on request. Not CFPB annual sworn Board-approved submission or an observed outside monitor. Existing adequate procedures may satisfy terms.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-corporate",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w24-ag-july-compliance",
        "label": "agreed to maintain internal compliance oversight",
        "detail": "Qualified committee, documented compliance management, training and quarterly Board reporting. Annual compliance report must be prepared and committee-approved, available to state on request. Not CFPB annual sworn Board-approved submission or an observed outside monitor. Existing adequate procedures may satisfy terms.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA27,30–35,53–54 PDF6–7,12; OR14,17–22,40–41 PDF6–9,14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-board-report",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-compliance",
      "target": "w23-cash-block-board",
      "label": "must provide quarterly compliance reporting",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "Agreed corporate committee reports to Board quarterly. Annual compliance report has separate committee approval/on-request availability; no report, actual meeting or blanket prior AG approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-board-report",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-compliance",
        "target": "w23-cash-block-board",
        "label": "must provide quarterly compliance reporting",
        "detail": "Agreed corporate committee reports to Board quarterly. Annual compliance report has separate committee approval/on-request availability; no report, actual meeting or blanket prior AG approval.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA30–35,53–54; OR17–22,40–41",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-redress",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
      "target": "w24-ag-july-redress",
      "label": "sets credit and conditional fallback mechanism",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or",
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Existing CFPB redress satisfies the agreed USD 75–120m redress obligation; no second additive award. If at least USD 75m has not been paid in connection with that order by 16 January 2030, materially similar fallback plan must be proposed by 18 March 2030. March deadline is plan submission, not completed payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-redress",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-resolution",
        "target": "w24-ag-july-redress",
        "label": "sets credit and conditional fallback mechanism",
        "detail": "Existing CFPB redress satisfies the agreed USD 75–120m redress obligation; no second additive award. If at least USD 75m has not been paid in connection with that order by 16 January 2030, materially similar fallback plan must be proposed by 18 March 2030. March deadline is plan submission, not completed payment.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "CA55–58 PDF12–13; OR42–45 PDF14–15; CFPB117–124",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-redress",
      "target": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
      "label": "credits payments under federal redress order",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or",
        "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
      ],
      "summary": "Payments under docket 2025-CFPB-0001 satisfy state redress; July terms do not create a second independent consumer pool. Federal reserve/shortfall mechanics remain separate from proof of consumer receipt.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-redress",
        "target": "w23-cash-redress-plan",
        "label": "credits payments under federal redress order",
        "detail": "Payments under docket 2025-CFPB-0001 satisfy state redress; July terms do not create a second independent consumer pool. Federal reserve/shortfall mechanics remain separate from proof of consumer receipt.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "CA55–58; OR42–45; CFPB117–124",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-fallback-approval",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-exec",
      "target": "w24-ag-july-redress",
      "label": "must approve conditional fallback plan before payment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "Defined eight-state committee reviews/approves materially similar fallback plan if condition triggers. Ongoing but incomplete federal payment requires an update; Block notifies committee within 10 days after sending CFPB its paragraph122 Redress Report. No internal vote rule or universal operating-policy veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-fallback-approval",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-exec",
        "target": "w24-ag-july-redress",
        "label": "must approve conditional fallback plan before payment",
        "detail": "Defined eight-state committee reviews/approves materially similar fallback plan if condition triggers. Ongoing but incomplete federal payment requires an update; Block notifies committee within 10 days after sending CFPB its paragraph122 Redress Report. No internal vote rule or universal operating-policy veto.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA22,55–58; OR11(n),42–45",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-july-enforcement",
      "source": "w24-ag-july-ags",
      "target": "w22-sig-block",
      "label": "agreed a conditional notice and response process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "Where the State determines material failure and, in its sole discretion, no health/safety/welfare threat, it will notify before legal action. Block has 15 business days for a good-faith written response, potentially describing ongoing correction/timetable; not necessarily a completed cure. Only enumerated duties sunset at five years, direct education at seven; not whole-judgment expiry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-july-enforcement",
        "source": "w24-ag-july-ags",
        "target": "w22-sig-block",
        "label": "agreed a conditional notice and response process",
        "detail": "Where the State determines material failure and, in its sole discretion, no health/safety/welfare threat, it will notify before legal action. Block has 15 business days for a good-faith written response, potentially describing ongoing correction/timetable; not necessarily a completed cure. Only enumerated duties sunset at five years, direct education at seven; not whole-judgment expiry.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CA64–66,75–76 PDF15–17; OR52–54,63–64 PDF17,19–20",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement",
      "source": "w22-sig-block",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "agreed investigation-expense reimbursement allocation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-july-or"
      ],
      "summary": "Oregon48 allocates USD 264,153.73 from the same USD 45m state pool to NAAG for participating states investigation costs/expenses, by wire using Oregon instructions. Agreed entitlement, not observed payment, a separate fine, named judgment creditor or proof of allocation to any fund or letter campaign. Financial details: value: 264,153.73; currency: USD; kind: agreed reimbursement allocation inside USD 45m pool; not additional or paid; period: July 2026 agreement; stated payment within 30 days",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement",
        "source": "w22-sig-block",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "agreed investigation-expense reimbursement allocation",
        "detail": "Oregon48 allocates USD 264,153.73 from the same USD 45m state pool to NAAG for participating states investigation costs/expenses, by wire using Oregon instructions. Agreed entitlement, not observed payment, a separate fine, named judgment creditor or proof of allocation to any fund or letter campaign.",
        "date": "State-specific agreed texts stipulate effective 8 July 2026. Party assent observed; judicial entry and subsequent changes/performance unverified.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "OR48 PDF15–16; compare money-award table PDF26–27",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 264,153.73; currency: USD; kind: agreed reimbursement allocation inside USD 45m pool; not additional or paid; period: July 2026 agreement; stated payment within 30 days"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-naag-governance",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "governs funds, property and management per current page",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-leadership"
      ],
      "summary": "Current description gives 13-AG Executive Committee organizational governance, distinct finance/audit oversight and executive staffing. Does not give NAAG command over every state investigation or imply current people approved past grants.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-naag-governance",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "governs funds, property and management per current page",
        "detail": "Current description gives 13-AG Executive Committee organizational governance, distinct finance/audit oversight and executive staffing. Does not give NAAG command over every state investigation or imply current people approved past grants.",
        "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Governing body and committee composition sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-leadership"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-naag-director",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag-director",
      "label": "employs executive director for daily operations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-leadership"
      ],
      "summary": "Published committee remit assigns employment and day-to-day management role. Specific appointment terms and historical incumbents not reconstructed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-naag-director",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag-director",
        "label": "employs executive director for daily operations",
        "detail": "Published committee remit assigns employment and day-to-day management role. Specific appointment terms and historical incumbents not reconstructed.",
        "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Leadership governing/staff sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-leadership"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-consolidated-remit",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag",
      "target": "w24-ag-consolidated",
      "label": "describes separate fund-oversight committee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-consolidated"
      ],
      "summary": "Current seven-person committee has consumer-protection/charity enforcement and training remit. Page does not supply approval threshold, Cash App allocation or amendment mapping the older three-/five-AG special committees to it.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-consolidated-remit",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag",
        "target": "w24-ag-consolidated",
        "label": "describes separate fund-oversight committee",
        "detail": "Current seven-person committee has consumer-protection/charity enforcement and training remit. Page does not supply approval threshold, Cash App allocation or amendment mapping the older three-/five-AG special committees to it.",
        "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Complete substantive committee page",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-consolidated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-member-capacity",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag",
      "target": "w24-ag-member-offices",
      "label": "describes grants, expertise and collaboration support",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-services",
        "w24-ag-s-ccp"
      ],
      "summary": "Member services and CCP describe investigation/prosecution expenses, legal consulting, training, research and communications. CCP directs consumers to state complaint portals and cannot resolve complaints itself. Specific grant, investigator or letter expenditure not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-member-capacity",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag",
        "target": "w24-ag-member-offices",
        "label": "describes grants, expertise and collaboration support",
        "detail": "Member services and CCP describe investigation/prosecution expenses, legal consulting, training, research and communications. CCP directs consumers to state complaint portals and cannot resolve complaints itself. Specific grant, investigator or letter expenditure not established.",
        "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Main service descriptions and complaint boundary",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-services",
          "w24-ag-s-ccp"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-resource-policy",
      "source": "w24-ag-member-offices",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "supply service fees under stated operating model",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ identifies member service fees, registration receipts and settlement-origin investment proceeds as operating sources, with stewarded funds separated/restricted. No annual audited denominator, contribution amount or Cash App-specific deposit. Stated no-corporate-donation policy is not a transaction audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-resource-policy",
        "source": "w24-ag-member-offices",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "supply service fees under stated operating model",
        "detail": "FAQ identifies member service fees, registration receipts and settlement-origin investment proceeds as operating sources, with stewarded funds separated/restricted. No annual audited denominator, contribution amount or Cash App-specific deposit. Stated no-corporate-donation policy is not a transaction audit.",
        "date": "Current organization page observed 9 September 2026; adoption and historical application not established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Funding/membership/stewarded-fund FAQ answers",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-provision",
      "source": "w24-ag-vw-allocation",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "rules describe specified settlement allocation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2016 VW rules recite a USD 20m settlement provision for consumer-protection oversight, training/enforcement and investigation reimbursement. Underlying settlement receipts not obtained; this is neither current balance nor a contribution tied to the Cash App/NCII matters. Financial details: value: 20,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement provision described in 2016 fund rules; receipt unverified; period: June 2016 partial settlement as recited",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-provision",
        "source": "w24-ag-vw-allocation",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "rules describe specified settlement allocation",
        "detail": "2016 VW rules recite a USD 20m settlement provision for consumer-protection oversight, training/enforcement and investigation reimbursement. Underlying settlement receipts not obtained; this is neither current balance nor a contribution tied to the Cash App/NCII matters.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "A, PDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 20,000,000; currency: USD; kind: settlement provision described in 2016 fund rules; receipt unverified; period: June 2016 partial settlement as recited"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-appoint",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-president",
      "target": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
      "label": "appoints three-AG committee subject to approval",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2016 rules require appointments from NAAG Executive Committee, with at most two members of one party. Applicant member office triggers temporary replacement under section E. No named vote or actual recusal record acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-appoint",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-president",
        "target": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
        "label": "appoints three-AG committee subject to approval",
        "detail": "2016 rules require appointments from NAAG Executive Committee, with at most two members of one party. Applicant member office triggers temporary replacement under section E. No named vote or actual recusal record acquired.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B and E, PDF1–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-appointment-approval",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "target": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
      "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2016 rules give Executive Committee appointment approval. This is separate from the special committee grant votes; present consolidated-committee authority is not inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-appointment-approval",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
        "target": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
        "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
        "detail": "2016 rules give Executive Committee appointment approval. This is separate from the special committee grant votes; present consolidated-committee authority is not inferred.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B, PDF1–2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-grants",
      "source": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
      "target": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
      "label": "approves principal grants by two affirmative votes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2016 rules permit principal grants; two affirmative votes approve, decisions final without appeal. Committee also approves investment policy. Recusal, purpose and accounting rules constrain authority; actual applications/votes/disbursements not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-grants",
        "source": "w24-ag-vw-committee",
        "target": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
        "label": "approves principal grants by two affirmative votes",
        "detail": "2016 rules permit principal grants; two affirmative votes approve, decisions final without appeal. Committee also approves investment policy. Recusal, purpose and accounting rules constrain authority; actual applications/votes/disbursements not obtained.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B–C,E and Attachment1, PDF1–3,5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-purpose",
      "source": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
      "target": "w24-ag-member-offices",
      "label": "may finance purpose-limited work with conditional repayment",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Segregated fund can support qualifying enforcement, experts and education. Litigation-success repayment is limited by law/recovery and excludes conferences, education/training and travel events; not uniformly repayable loans. Written AG/director applications, bills/receipts and June30 accounting specified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-purpose",
        "source": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
        "target": "w24-ag-member-offices",
        "label": "may finance purpose-limited work with conditional repayment",
        "detail": "Segregated fund can support qualifying enforcement, experts and education. Litigation-success repayment is limited by law/recovery and excludes conferences, education/training and travel events; not uniformly repayable loans. Written AG/director applications, bills/receipts and June30 accounting specified.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "C–D and Attachment1, PDF2–3,5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-fee",
      "source": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "authorizes inception and annual administration fee",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2016 rules authorize 1.0% of total fund value at inception and annually, covering administration/third-party costs. Rate authorization, not a calculated current fee or observed payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-fee",
        "source": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "authorizes inception and annual administration fee",
        "detail": "2016 rules authorize 1.0% of total fund value at inception and annually, covering administration/third-party costs. Rate authorization, not a calculated current fee or observed payment.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "F, PDF3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-dissolution",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "target": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
      "label": "may dissolve upon specified purpose determination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "If special committee determines purpose no longer exists, Executive Committee may dissolve and direct remaining funds to NAAG General Fund. Conditional authority, not observed transfer; not transplanted to FSF.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-vw-dissolution",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
        "target": "w24-ag-vw-fund",
        "label": "may dissolve upon specified purpose determination",
        "detail": "If special committee determines purpose no longer exists, Executive Committee may dissolve and direct remaining funds to NAAG General Fund. Conditional authority, not observed transfer; not transplanted to FSF.",
        "date": "2016 rules approval year; exact day and later amendments/current committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B–C, PDF1–2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-appoint",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-president",
      "target": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
      "label": "appoints five-AG committee subject to approval",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2012 MOU: one-year terms, no more than three same-party members, Executive Committee approval. Applicant-office committee member requires temporary replacement. No present appointment or recusal implementation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-appoint",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-president",
        "target": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
        "label": "appoints five-AG committee subject to approval",
        "detail": "2012 MOU: one-year terms, no more than three same-party members, Executive Committee approval. Applicant-office committee member requires temporary replacement. No present appointment or recusal implementation established.",
        "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B,E, PDF2,4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-appointment-approval",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
      "target": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
      "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "2012 appointment approval is distinct from the special committee grant-decision thresholds. Current consolidation or delegation amendment not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-appointment-approval",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag-exec",
        "target": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
        "label": "approves presidential committee appointments",
        "detail": "2012 appointment approval is distinct from the special committee grant-decision thresholds. Current consolidation or delegation amendment not obtained.",
        "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B, PDF2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-grants",
      "source": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
      "target": "w24-ag-fsf",
      "label": "approves grants using size and party thresholds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "At least USD 5,000: three votes; smaller: two votes from different parties. Principal available; decisions final without appeal. Not a claim that today’s consolidated body uses this unamended rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-grants",
        "source": "w24-ag-fsf-committee",
        "target": "w24-ag-fsf",
        "label": "approves grants using size and party thresholds",
        "detail": "At least USD 5,000: three votes; smaller: two votes from different parties. Principal available; decisions final without appeal. Not a claim that today’s consolidated body uses this unamended rule.",
        "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "A–B, PDF2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-purpose",
      "source": "w24-ag-fsf",
      "target": "w24-ag-member-offices",
      "label": "may finance qualifying investigations and training",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "MOU permits investigation/prosecution expenses, experts, consulting and education with segregated purpose limits, conditional recovery-based repayment and education/travel exceptions. Applications and finance bills/receipts supply expenditure trail; no named later grantee or actual payment established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-purpose",
        "source": "w24-ag-fsf",
        "target": "w24-ag-member-offices",
        "label": "may finance qualifying investigations and training",
        "detail": "MOU permits investigation/prosecution expenses, experts, consulting and education with segregated purpose limits, conditional recovery-based repayment and education/travel exceptions. Applications and finance bills/receipts supply expenditure trail; no named later grantee or actual payment established.",
        "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "A–D PDF2–3; Attachment2 PDF7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-fee",
      "source": "w24-ag-fsf",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "authorizes annual administration fee at fiscal close",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "MOU authorizes 1.0% of total fund value at NAAG fiscal-year close. Current balance, fee application and payment not obtained; unlike VW, no dissolution-to-General-Fund clause is imported.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-fsf-fee",
        "source": "w24-ag-fsf",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "authorizes annual administration fee at fiscal close",
        "detail": "MOU authorizes 1.0% of total fund value at NAAG fiscal-year close. Current balance, fee application and payment not obtained; unlike VW, no dissolution-to-General-Fund clause is imported.",
        "date": "MOU effective 31 October 2012; later amendments and present committee applicability unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "E–H, PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-foundation-support",
      "source": "w24-ag-foundation",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "reports other support to its sole supported organization",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Calendar tax year 2024; return signed 14 November 2025, release date unestablished.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-foundation-return"
      ],
      "summary": "Foundation 2024 Schedule A names NAAG, reports USD 0 monetary support and USD 5,192,939 other support; Schedule R lists related organization. Other support is not cash and this is not association-wide budget or complete operational-control proof. Financial details: value: 5,192,939; currency: USD; kind: Foundation-reported other support; not cash payment; period: Calendar 2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-foundation-support",
        "source": "w24-ag-foundation",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "reports other support to its sole supported organization",
        "detail": "Foundation 2024 Schedule A names NAAG, reports USD 0 monetary support and USD 5,192,939 other support; Schedule R lists related organization. Other support is not cash and this is not association-wide budget or complete operational-control proof.",
        "date": "Calendar tax year 2024; return signed 14 November 2025, release date unestablished.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF16 ScheduleA; PDF44 ScheduleR",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-foundation-return"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,192,939; currency: USD; kind: Foundation-reported other support; not cash payment; period: Calendar 2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-policy-procedure",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag",
      "target": "w24-ag-procedure",
      "label": "publishes sponsorship and circulation requirements",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Version May 2026; exact adoption day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-procedure"
      ],
      "summary": "May 2026 process requires at least two Democratic/two Republican sponsors, a draft and colleague letter, named contacts and deadline at least 10 business days ahead. Any edit requires new circulation and voids prior signatures. Not proof of August 2025 drafting steps.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-policy-procedure",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag",
        "target": "w24-ag-procedure",
        "label": "publishes sponsorship and circulation requirements",
        "detail": "May 2026 process requires at least two Democratic/two Republican sponsors, a draft and colleague letter, named contacts and deadline at least 10 business days ahead. Any edit requires new circulation and voids prior signatures. Not proof of August 2025 drafting steps.",
        "date": "Version May 2026; exact adoption day unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF1, steps1–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-procedure"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-jurisdiction-signoff",
      "source": "w24-ag-member-offices",
      "target": "w24-ag-procedure",
      "label": "confirm or reject each circulated draft under process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Version May 2026; no retrospective application inferred.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-procedure"
      ],
      "summary": "AGs or designated staff authenticate, confirm/reject for jurisdiction and record name/email/title. Retained signature images cover joined initiatives, not blanket permission. No private account or actual 2025 audit trail acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-jurisdiction-signoff",
        "source": "w24-ag-member-offices",
        "target": "w24-ag-procedure",
        "label": "confirm or reject each circulated draft under process",
        "detail": "AGs or designated staff authenticate, confirm/reject for jurisdiction and record name/email/title. Retained signature images cover joined initiatives, not blanket permission. No private account or actual 2025 audit trail acquired.",
        "date": "Version May 2026; no retrospective application inferred.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF1–2, step4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-procedure"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-letterhead-threshold",
      "source": "w24-ag-procedure",
      "target": "w24-ag-naag",
      "label": "sets 36-state threshold for association distribution",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Version May 2026; exact effective day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-procedure"
      ],
      "summary": "At 36 signatory states NAAG letterhead, coordinated releases and electronic transmission; below threshold, states receive signed letter with sponsor seals and disseminate themselves. Distribution threshold, not legislative/court authority or proof of historical votes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-letterhead-threshold",
        "source": "w24-ag-procedure",
        "target": "w24-ag-naag",
        "label": "sets 36-state threshold for association distribution",
        "detail": "At 36 signatory states NAAG letterhead, coordinated releases and electronic transmission; below threshold, states receive signed letter with sponsor seals and disseminate themselves. Distribution threshold, not legislative/court authority or proof of historical votes.",
        "date": "Version May 2026; exact effective day unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF2, step5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-procedure"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-payment-endorsement",
      "source": "w24-ag-letter-coalition",
      "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "label": "endorsed requests to payment-platform counsel",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters",
        "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship"
      ],
      "summary": "Combined dated letters and official announcement identify 47-AG coalition. Payment body seeks control descriptions and commitments to proactive NCII seller exclusion under private rules. No compulsory deadline, statutory order, sanction or proved recipient action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-payment-endorsement",
        "source": "w24-ag-letter-coalition",
        "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "label": "endorsed requests to payment-platform counsel",
        "detail": "Combined dated letters and official announcement identify 47-AG coalition. Payment body seeks control descriptions and commitments to proactive NCII seller exclusion under private rules. No compulsory deadline, statutory order, sanction or proved recipient action.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Payment PDF1–3,4–7; PA announcement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters",
          "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-search-endorsement",
      "source": "w24-ag-letter-coalition",
      "target": "w24-ag-search-letter",
      "label": "endorsed separate search-provider requests",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Separate search body asks restrictions, warnings and redirects and discusses Take It Down Act. Do not import that statutory discussion into the payment body or count requested changes as implemented.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-search-endorsement",
        "source": "w24-ag-letter-coalition",
        "target": "w24-ag-search-letter",
        "label": "endorsed separate search-provider requests",
        "detail": "Separate search body asks restrictions, warnings and redirects and discusses Take It Down Act. Do not import that statutory discussion into the payment body or count requested changes as implemented.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Search PDF9–11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-letterhead",
      "source": "w24-ag-naag",
      "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "label": "appears as letterhead and coordinating identity",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Original visibly bears NAAG letterhead and 2025 officers/staff. That establishes institutional presentation; actual drafting, funding, dispatch and jurisdiction sign-off record remain not obtained. May 2026 procedure is not backdated as proof.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-letterhead",
        "source": "w24-ag-naag",
        "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "label": "appears as letterhead and coordinating identity",
        "detail": "Original visibly bears NAAG letterhead and 2025 officers/staff. That establishes institutional presentation; actual drafting, funding, dispatch and jurisdiction sign-off record remain not obtained. May 2026 procedure is not backdated as proof.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF1 letterhead; dated combined instrument",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-clark-authorship",
      "source": "w24-ag-clark",
      "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "label": "official announcement attributes authorship to her",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Attribution published 26 August 2025 concerning letters dated 22 August; drafting date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship"
      ],
      "summary": "Pennsylvania participant announcement attributes combined-letter authorship to Vermont AG Charity Clark and names five co-sponsors. Original drafts and individual staff composition are unknown; not proof she controlled every signature or subsequent company decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-clark-authorship",
        "source": "w24-ag-clark",
        "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "label": "official announcement attributes authorship to her",
        "detail": "Pennsylvania participant announcement attributes combined-letter authorship to Vermont AG Charity Clark and names five co-sponsors. Original drafts and individual staff composition are unknown; not proof she controlled every signature or subsequent company decision.",
        "date": "Attribution published 26 August 2025 concerning letters dated 22 August; drafting date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "PA announcement authorship/co-sponsors paragraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-visa",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "visa",
      "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to Visa legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-visa",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "visa",
        "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
        "detail": "Addressed to Visa legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3: recipients and payment body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-mastercard",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "mastercard",
      "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to Mastercard legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-mastercard",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "mastercard",
        "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
        "detail": "Addressed to Mastercard legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3: recipients and payment body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-amex",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "w24-ag-amex",
      "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to American Express legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-amex",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "w24-ag-amex",
        "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
        "detail": "Addressed to American Express legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3: recipients and payment body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-paypal",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "paypal",
      "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to PayPal legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-paypal",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "paypal",
        "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
        "detail": "Addressed to PayPal legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3: recipients and payment body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-google",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "google",
      "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to Google Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-google",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "google",
        "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
        "detail": "Addressed to Google Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3: recipients and payment body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-apple",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "w24-ag-apple",
      "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to Apple Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-demand-apple",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "w24-ag-apple",
        "label": "requests proactive NCII seller payment-authorization removal",
        "detail": "Addressed to Apple Pay legal representatives: asks present controls and further action enforcing existing terms/acceptable-use policies against sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content. Seller-level scope; no named bank instruction, adjudication, compulsory response deadline or confirmed receipt/implementation. Not a general pornography ban.",
        "date": "Letter dated 22 August 2025; announcement 26 August. Actual dispatch/receipt and response not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3: recipients and payment body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-e-idaho-warning",
      "source": "w24-ag-labrador",
      "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "label": "reiterated demand and threatened legal consequences",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Official newsletter 19 September 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w24-ag-s-idaho",
        "w24-ag-s-letters"
      ],
      "summary": "19 September official newsletter presents safeguards or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. A signatory public warning makes consequence-free-persuasion framing inadequate, but supplies no filed action, operative order or company outcome; not attributed to every co-signatory.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-e-idaho-warning",
        "source": "w24-ag-labrador",
        "target": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "label": "reiterated demand and threatened legal consequences",
        "detail": "19 September official newsletter presents safeguards or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. A signatory public warning makes consequence-free-persuasion framing inadequate, but supplies no filed action, operative order or company outcome; not attributed to every co-signatory.",
        "date": "Official newsletter 19 September 2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Idaho substantive body, reader97–116 especially108–115",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
            "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-idaho",
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-chiu-office",
      "source": "w25-sf-chiu",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "acted as City Attorney in this proceeding",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "The named public official acts through the office for the People; public litigation role only.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-chiu-office",
        "source": "w25-sf-chiu",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "acted as City Attorney in this proceeding",
        "detail": "The named public official acts through the office for the People; public litigation role only.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Caption; opening stipulation; definitions",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-sponsor",
      "source": "w25-sf-chiu",
      "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "label": "was identified as sponsor of",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
      ],
      "summary": "March 18 committee analysis identifies Chiu as sponsor and reproduces his case for facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties. No private drafting contract or undisclosed direction established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-sponsor",
        "source": "w25-sf-chiu",
        "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "label": "was identified as sponsor of",
        "detail": "March 18 committee analysis identifies Chiu as sponsor and reproduces his case for facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties. No private drafting contract or undisclosed direction established.",
        "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 1,7–8,17",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-author",
      "source": "w25-sf-bauer-kahan",
      "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "label": "authored and offered primary-purpose clarification for",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-march-analysis",
        "w25-sf-s-chapter"
      ],
      "summary": "Official analysis identifies the author and describes her proposed clarification. The proposed redline is not proof of adoption on March 24; later wording timing is unestablished.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-author",
        "source": "w25-sf-bauer-kahan",
        "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "label": "authored and offered primary-purpose clarification for",
        "detail": "Official analysis identifies the author and describes her proposed clarification. The proposed redline is not proof of adoption on March 24; later wording timing is unestablished.",
        "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "March analysis PDF 1,12–13; chaptered bill heading",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-march-analysis",
          "w25-sf-s-chapter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-opposition",
      "source": "w25-sf-civil-liberties-advocacy",
      "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "label": "opposed unless amended",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
      ],
      "summary": "Dated analysis records expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. No claim that this group obtained the final boundaries.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-opposition",
        "source": "w25-sf-civil-liberties-advocacy",
        "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "label": "opposed unless amended",
        "detail": "Dated analysis records expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. No claim that this group obtained the final boundaries.",
        "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 17–18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-litigation-rationale",
      "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "label": "supplied litigation-based rationale for facilitator liability",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
      ],
      "summary": "Committee staff connects the office’s2024 case and difficulty reaching overseas/fictitious operators to expansion toward enablers, expressly including payment processors. This is a published design rationale, not a recipient-specific liability finding or motive about revenue.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-litigation-rationale",
        "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "target": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "label": "supplied litigation-based rationale for facilitator liability",
        "detail": "Committee staff connects the office’s2024 case and difficulty reaching overseas/fictitious operators to expansion toward enablers, expressly including payment processors. This is a published design rationale, not a recipient-specific liability finding or motive about revenue.",
        "date": "2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 7–8 and Chiu support statement PDF 17",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-facilitation-rule",
      "source": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "target": "w25-sf-facilitator-class",
      "label": "creates conditional civil exposure for specified facilitation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective date; not a finding that a particular provider violated the statute. Duties are not represented as ending on this date.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-code",
        "w25-sf-s-chapter"
      ],
      "summary": "CIV 1708.86(b)(3) covers knowing facilitation or reckless aiding/abetting of prohibited creation/disclosure. Service primary purpose, underlying conduct and statutory/federal/ISP exceptions matter. It does not designate every host, app store, bank or AI service.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-facilitation-rule",
        "source": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "target": "w25-sf-facilitator-class",
        "label": "creates conditional civil exposure for specified facilitation",
        "detail": "CIV 1708.86(b)(3) covers knowing facilitation or reckless aiding/abetting of prohibited creation/disclosure. Service primary purpose, underlying conduct and statutory/federal/ISP exceptions matter. It does not designate every host, app store, bank or AI service.",
        "date": "Effective date; not a finding that a particular provider violated the statute. Duties are not represented as ending on this date.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "(a)(3),(b)(1)–(3),(d),(i),(j); AB 621 section 2 is narrowly declaratory",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-code",
          "w25-sf-s-chapter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-presumption-design",
      "source": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "target": "w25-sf-notice-presumption",
      "label": "establishes a receipt-based conditional presumption",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective-date anchor, not receipt of any particular notice or expiration of the legal mechanism.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-code"
      ],
      "summary": "A depicted individual/public prosecutor must supply sufficient evidence of enabling an ongoing violating service, name it, generally describe enabling services and supply contact details; use prominently displayed designated process if present. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within 30 days after receipt supplies the presumption; a court may extend for investigation. No automatic adjudication or universal30-day immunity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-presumption-design",
        "source": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "target": "w25-sf-notice-presumption",
        "label": "establishes a receipt-based conditional presumption",
        "detail": "A depicted individual/public prosecutor must supply sufficient evidence of enabling an ongoing violating service, name it, generally describe enabling services and supply contact details; use prominently displayed designated process if present. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within 30 days after receipt supplies the presumption; a court may extend for investigation. No automatic adjudication or universal30-day immunity.",
        "date": "Effective-date anchor, not receipt of any particular notice or expiration of the legal mechanism.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "(c)(2)(A)–(B)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-code"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-public-remedies",
      "source": "w25-sf-ab621",
      "target": "w25-sf-prosecutor-role",
      "label": "authorizes civil enforcement and court-awarded remedies",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective-date anchor; actual judgment and quantum require their own record.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-code"
      ],
      "summary": "Public prosecutors may seek injunction/equitable relief, USD 25,000 per violation or USD 50,000 malicious violation, reasonable fees and other court relief without proof of actual harm to the depicted individual. These are remedy conditions, not assessed or received money. Private claimant damages are a different menu.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-public-remedies",
        "source": "w25-sf-ab621",
        "target": "w25-sf-prosecutor-role",
        "label": "authorizes civil enforcement and court-awarded remedies",
        "detail": "Public prosecutors may seek injunction/equitable relief, USD 25,000 per violation or USD 50,000 malicious violation, reasonable fees and other court relief without proof of actual harm to the depicted individual. These are remedy conditions, not assessed or received money. Private claimant damages are a different menu.",
        "date": "Effective-date anchor; actual judgment and quantum require their own record.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "(a)(14),(f)(1)–(2)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-code"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-notice-issuance",
      "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "label": "reportedly sent notices to Apple and Google",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-chronicle"
      ],
      "summary": "Chronicle reports July 16 notices, confidential app attachments,28-day response request and threatened civil enforcement. Actual notices, attachments and delivery/receipt records were not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-notice-issuance",
        "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "label": "reportedly sent notices to Apple and Google",
        "detail": "Chronicle reports July 16 notices, confidential app attachments,28-day response request and threatened civil enforcement. Actual notices, attachments and delivery/receipt records were not acquired.",
        "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Complete body121–179; accepted notice-recovery.md",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-chronicle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-prior-letter-citation",
      "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
      "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "label": "was reportedly cited as earlier notice",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
        "w24-ag-s-letters",
        "w25-sf-s-code"
      ],
      "summary": "Chronicle says the later SF notices cite the47-AG warning. This is a reported document link; the old general letter alone does not establish current(c)(2) service-specific evidence, routing, receipt or subsequent failure predicates.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-prior-letter-citation",
        "source": "w24-ag-payment-letter",
        "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "label": "was reportedly cited as earlier notice",
        "detail": "Chronicle says the later SF notices cite the47-AG warning. This is a reported document link; the old general letter alone does not establish current(c)(2) service-specific evidence, routing, receipt or subsequent failure predicates.",
        "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Chronicle body; original payment letter PDF 1–3; current(c)(2); notice-bridge-review.md",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
          "w24-ag-s-letters",
          "w25-sf-s-code"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-demand-apple",
      "source": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "target": "w24-ag-apple",
      "label": "reportedly requested action against identified nudify apps",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
        "w25-sf-s-wired"
      ],
      "summary": "Later SF intervention reportedly identifies apps in confidential attachments and requests action. It is not the earlier NAAG letter; notice originals and precise legal sufficiency remain unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-demand-apple",
        "source": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "target": "w24-ag-apple",
        "label": "reportedly requested action against identified nudify apps",
        "detail": "Later SF intervention reportedly identifies apps in confidential attachments and requests action. It is not the earlier NAAG letter; notice originals and precise legal sufficiency remain unverified.",
        "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Accepted complete report-body scopes in notice-recovery.md",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
          "w25-sf-s-wired"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-demand-google",
      "source": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "target": "google",
      "label": "reportedly requested action against identified nudify apps",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
        "w25-sf-s-wired"
      ],
      "summary": "Later SF intervention reportedly identifies apps in confidential attachments and requests action. It is not the earlier NAAG letter; notice originals and precise legal sufficiency remain unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-demand-google",
        "source": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "target": "google",
        "label": "reportedly requested action against identified nudify apps",
        "detail": "Later SF intervention reportedly identifies apps in confidential attachments and requests action. It is not the earlier NAAG letter; notice originals and precise legal sufficiency remain unverified.",
        "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Accepted complete report-body scopes in notice-recovery.md",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
          "w25-sf-s-wired"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-apple-response",
      "source": "w24-ag-apple",
      "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "label": "reported responsive app enforcement through a spokesperson",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reporting/update date, not established date of each app action.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-wired"
      ],
      "summary": "WIRED publishes Apple’s account: three apps removed, developer termination in progress and four others required to address violations. Not independently observed app removal, completed developer termination or payment disconnection; exact action dates unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-apple-response",
        "source": "w24-ag-apple",
        "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "label": "reported responsive app enforcement through a spokesperson",
        "detail": "WIRED publishes Apple’s account: three apps removed, developer termination in progress and four others required to address violations. Not independently observed app removal, completed developer termination or payment disconnection; exact action dates unknown.",
        "date": "Reporting/update date, not established date of each app action.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "WIRED substantive body65–89",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-wired"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-google-response",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
      "label": "reported five identified app suspensions through a spokesperson",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reporting/update date; individual suspension dates unestablished.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-wired"
      ],
      "summary": "WIRED publishes Google’s account that five identified apps were suspended. This is a company statement connected to the SF intervention, not independent availability measurement or proof of bank/payment action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-google-response",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "w25-sf-july-notices",
        "label": "reported five identified app suspensions through a spokesperson",
        "detail": "WIRED publishes Google’s account that five identified apps were suspended. This is a company statement connected to the SF intervention, not independent availability measurement or proof of bank/payment action.",
        "date": "Reporting/update date; individual suspension dates unestablished.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "WIRED substantive body65–89",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-wired"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-prosecution",
      "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "target": "w25-sf-case",
      "label": "prosecuted the action for the People",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment",
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Public action described in the court documents; Briver settlement and Sol Ecom alternative-service motion are different parts of the case.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-prosecution",
        "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "target": "w25-sf-case",
        "label": "prosecuted the action for the People",
        "detail": "Public action described in the court documents; Briver settlement and Sol Ecom alternative-service motion are different parts of the case.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Judgment caption and opening; Tilak declaration caption",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment",
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-sol-case",
      "source": "w25-sf-sol-ecom",
      "target": "w25-sf-case",
      "label": "was named in the alternative-service proceeding",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-13 – 2025-06-13",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Tilak declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom. Captioned respondent status is not judgment liability or proof of service completion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-sol-case",
        "source": "w25-sf-sol-ecom",
        "target": "w25-sf-case",
        "label": "was named in the alternative-service proceeding",
        "detail": "Tilak declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom. Captioned respondent status is not judgment liability or proof of service completion.",
        "date": "2025-06-13 – 2025-06-13",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 1–6 caption and declaration",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-court-judgment",
      "source": "w25-sf-superior-court",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "label": "signed the Briver final judgment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Judge signature29 May 2025; filing stamp and clerk service30 May. Paragraph6 makes signature the effective date. Signed counterparts resolve the other blank signature page; no separate docket entry acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-court-judgment",
        "source": "w25-sf-superior-court",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "label": "signed the Briver final judgment",
        "detail": "Judge signature29 May 2025; filing stamp and clerk service30 May. Paragraph6 makes signature the effective date. Signed counterparts resolve the other blank signature page; no separate docket entry acquired.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 1,12–13; paragraphs6,19,45",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-briver-settlement",
      "source": "w25-sf-briver",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "label": "stipulated to company-specific obligations without admissions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "People and Briver stipulate without taking proof or admitting alleged legal/factual issues; appeal waived. Defined associated-person scope does not merge every captioned defendant or service provider.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-briver-settlement",
        "source": "w25-sf-briver",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "label": "stipulated to company-specific obligations without admissions",
        "detail": "People and Briver stipulate without taking proof or admitting alleged legal/factual issues; appeal waived. Defined associated-person scope does not merge every captioned defendant or service provider.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 2 opening and definitions; paragraph 25 as-of14 August 2024 scope",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-operating-bar",
      "source": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver",
      "label": "permanently prohibits the specified image-transformation operation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Effective-date anchor; prohibition is permanent, not a one-day or five-year restriction.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraph14 bars owning, operating or aiding/abetting websites using AI to convert clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images. No express consent exception. The five-year domain/reporting period does not expressly terminate this permanent bar.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-operating-bar",
        "source": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver",
        "label": "permanently prohibits the specified image-transformation operation",
        "detail": "Paragraph14 bars owning, operating or aiding/abetting websites using AI to convert clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images. No express consent exception. The five-year domain/reporting period does not expressly terminate this permanent bar.",
        "date": "Effective-date anchor; prohibition is permanent, not a one-day or five-year restriction.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraph14, PDF 3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-domain-control",
      "source": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver",
      "label": "prohibits registration transfer and requires five years of domain inactivity",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Five-year obligation measured from effective date; performance not observed.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraph 15 prohibits transferring registration of the defined Briver Websites and requires maintaining their registrations in inactive hold/lock status for five years so the domains do not resolve. Paragraphs 17–18 require no ownership transfer and documentary proof of continued Briver/affiliate registration. This is a non-transfer obligation; there is no missing transfer-recipient question or independent registrar command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-domain-control",
        "source": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver",
        "label": "prohibits registration transfer and requires five years of domain inactivity",
        "detail": "Paragraph 15 prohibits transferring registration of the defined Briver Websites and requires maintaining their registrations in inactive hold/lock status for five years so the domains do not resolve. Paragraphs 17–18 require no ownership transfer and documentary proof of continued Briver/affiliate registration. This is a non-transfer obligation; there is no missing transfer-recipient question or independent registrar command.",
        "date": "Five-year obligation measured from effective date; performance not observed.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Paragraph15 PDF 3 and17–18 PDF 4–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-reporting-order",
      "source": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver-reporting",
      "label": "requires information and sworn documentary attestations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Within30 days: website names, API/affiliate source and sharing operators, model/training-data summary and other known similar operators. Within14 days and annually five years: sworn compliance/domain proof. Late attestation requires notice and14-day receipt-based cure before violation. Not a demand for an entire training-data corpus.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-reporting-order",
        "source": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver-reporting",
        "label": "requires information and sworn documentary attestations",
        "detail": "Within30 days: website names, API/affiliate source and sharing operators, model/training-data summary and other known similar operators. Within14 days and annually five years: sworn compliance/domain proof. Late attestation requires notice and14-day receipt-based cure before violation. Not a demand for an entire training-data corpus.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraph16 PDF 4; paragraphs17–18 PDF 4–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-reports-to-city",
      "source": "w25-sf-briver",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "must deliver network information and recurring compliance proof",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-reports-to-city",
        "source": "w25-sf-briver",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "must deliver network information and recurring compliance proof",
        "detail": "Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs16–18,47; filings.md",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-penalty",
      "source": "w25-sf-briver",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "owes scheduled civil penalties to the office",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-penalty",
        "source": "w25-sf-briver",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "owes scheduled civil penalties to the office",
        "detail": "USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs19–23 PDF 5; paragraph 35 PDF 8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-inspection",
      "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver",
      "label": "may inspect domain-related records for judgment compliance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-inspection",
        "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver",
        "label": "may inspect domain-related records for judgment compliance",
        "detail": "Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraph24 PDF 6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-further-enforcement",
      "source": "w25-sf-superior-court",
      "target": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
      "label": "retains conditional enforcement and modification authority",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Additional penalties, enforcement costs and relief require noticed motion/hearing and violation finding. Modification requires court order or written consent plus court approval; materially false/inaccurate information route requires proof. Individuals’ private claims remain preserved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-further-enforcement",
        "source": "w25-sf-superior-court",
        "target": "w25-sf-briver-judgment",
        "label": "retains conditional enforcement and modification authority",
        "detail": "Additional penalties, enforcement costs and relief require noticed motion/hearing and violation finding. Modification requires court order or written consent plus court approval; materially false/inaccurate information route requires proof. Individuals’ private claims remain preserved.",
        "date": "2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs26,29,37–38,43; PDF 6–9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-announced-shutdown",
      "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "target": "w25-sf-announced-outcome",
      "label": "reported the wider outcome of its investigation and lawsuit",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-02 – 2025-06-02",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-june-announcement"
      ],
      "summary": "City reported ten sites offline OR inaccessible in California and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Does not identify each provider’s act or establish permanent worldwide shutdown. Briver’s judgment is one concrete instrument, not a ten-defendant order.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-announced-shutdown",
        "source": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "target": "w25-sf-announced-outcome",
        "label": "reported the wider outcome of its investigation and lawsuit",
        "detail": "City reported ten sites offline OR inaccessible in California and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Does not identify each provider’s act or establish permanent worldwide shutdown. Briver’s judgment is one concrete instrument, not a ten-defendant order.",
        "date": "2025-06-02 – 2025-06-02",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Complete2 June 2025 article; judgment scope independently checked",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-june-announcement"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-production-cloudflare",
      "source": "w25-sf-cloudflare",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-production-cloudflare",
        "source": "w25-sf-cloudflare",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
        "detail": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
        "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs18–19,24; PDF 4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-production-namecheap",
      "source": "w25-sf-namecheap",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to their named registrar Namecheap, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-production-namecheap",
        "source": "w25-sf-namecheap",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
        "detail": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to their named registrar Namecheap, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
        "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs20–21,24; PDF 4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-production-namecom",
      "source": "w25-sf-namecom",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff from its named former registrar Name.com. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-production-namecom",
        "source": "w25-sf-namecom",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
        "detail": "Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff from its named former registrar Name.com. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.",
        "date": "Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs22–24; PDF 4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-production-google",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Counsel says Google LLC produced records on6 June 2025 concerning ClothOff and Drawnudes. The declaration is primary sworn testimony about production; actual subpoena/production not acquired. No app, domain or payment shutdown implied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-production-google",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena",
        "detail": "Counsel says Google LLC produced records on6 June 2025 concerning ClothOff and Drawnudes. The declaration is primary sworn testimony about production; actual subpoena/production not acquired. No app, domain or payment shutdown implied.",
        "date": "2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Paragraph29 PDF 5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-correspondence-service",
      "source": "w25-sf-drawnudes",
      "target": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
      "label": "was the service associated with the correspondent by city counsel",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-01-03 – 2025-01-03",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "January 3 city email says the office understands the correspondent operates Drawnudes and asks whether policies cover other websites. Association is not independently resolved legal ownership or identity with ClothOff.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-correspondence-service",
        "source": "w25-sf-drawnudes",
        "target": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
        "label": "was the service associated with the correspondent by city counsel",
        "detail": "January 3 city email says the office understands the correspondent operates Drawnudes and asks whether policies cover other websites. Association is not independently resolved legal ownership or identity with ClothOff.",
        "date": "2025-01-03 – 2025-01-03",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Exhibit6 PDF 19; declaration25 PDF 4–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-operator-esafety",
      "source": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "claims prior requirements and confirmation of compliance",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Claim date; dates and substance of alleged earlier contact unknown. Repeated4 January 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "December 25 operator email says eSafety contacted it, requirements were met and January 2025 AI-law alignment was confirmed; January 4 repeats the claim. No Australian notice/assessment attached. This edge records the claim, not approval, performance or inter-regulator coordination.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-operator-esafety",
        "source": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "claims prior requirements and confirmation of compliance",
        "detail": "December 25 operator email says eSafety contacted it, requirements were met and January 2025 AI-law alignment was confirmed; January 4 repeats the claim. No Australian notice/assessment attached. This edge records the claim, not approval, performance or inter-regulator coordination.",
        "date": "Claim date; dates and substance of alleged earlier contact unknown. Repeated4 January 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Exhibit6 section 6 PDF 21 and follow-up PDF 19",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-operator-city",
      "source": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
      "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
      "label": "offered cooperation and requested written requirements",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-25 – 2024-12-25",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-tilak"
      ],
      "summary": "Email requests written SF requirements and discusses possible territorial restrictions. Offer and claimed capability do not establish implementation or an issuing-provider command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-operator-city",
        "source": "w25-sf-operator-claim",
        "target": "w25-sf-city-attorney",
        "label": "offered cooperation and requested written requirements",
        "detail": "Email requests written SF requirements and discusses possible territorial restrictions. Offer and claimed capability do not establish implementation or an issuing-provider command.",
        "date": "2024-12-25 – 2024-12-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Exhibit6 PDF 19,22",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-clothoff-outreach",
      "source": "esafety",
      "target": "w25-sf-clothoff",
      "label": "sent preparatory guidance and sought details of claimed changes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Actual correspondence span; not an interval of certified compliance.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-foi141"
      ],
      "summary": "October 3 outreach recommends considering DIS coverage; November reply says likely captured and22 December commencement; December 5 and January 8 follow-ups seek details of changes. This correspondence is not a compliance certificate and supplies no Drawnudes identity join.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-clothoff-outreach",
        "source": "esafety",
        "target": "w25-sf-clothoff",
        "label": "sent preparatory guidance and sought details of claimed changes",
        "detail": "October 3 outreach recommends considering DIS coverage; November reply says likely captured and22 December commencement; December 5 and January 8 follow-ups seek details of changes. This correspondence is not a compliance certificate and supplies no Drawnudes identity join.",
        "date": "Actual correspondence span; not an interval of certified compliance.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Document 2 PDF 3–7; Document 3 PDF 8–13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-foi141"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-made",
      "source": "inman-grant",
      "target": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "label": "made the industry standard under statutory authority",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-06-19 – 2024-06-19",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-dis-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "Made19 June 2024 under Online Safety Act section 145, registered 21 June. This is delegated legislation, not case-specific permission. Existing public-official identity reused.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-made",
        "source": "inman-grant",
        "target": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "label": "made the industry standard under statutory authority",
        "detail": "Made19 June 2024 under Online Safety Act section 145, registered 21 June. This is delegated legislation, not case-specific permission. Existing public-official identity reused.",
        "date": "2024-06-19 – 2024-06-19",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Cover and sections1–3, PDF 1,5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-dis-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-clock",
      "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "target": "w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
      "label": "imposes category-specific duties from 22 December 2024",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Commencement anchor; not an expiry date. Does not verify the operator intended this instrument.",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-dis-standard",
        "w25-sf-s-foi141"
      ],
      "summary": "Section5 limits territorial/service scope; section 6 definition and immaterial-risk exclusion control classification. Section22 requires specified child-abuse/pro-terror output safeguards, review and relevant detection; limited control/visibility qualifications matter. Not a finding that this operator is compliant or every adult output prohibited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-clock",
        "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "target": "w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
        "label": "imposes category-specific duties from 22 December 2024",
        "detail": "Section5 limits territorial/service scope; section 6 definition and immaterial-risk exclusion control classification. Section22 requires specified child-abuse/pro-terror output safeguards, review and relevant detection; limited control/visibility qualifications matter. Not a finding that this operator is compliant or every adult output prohibited.",
        "date": "Commencement anchor; not an expiry date. Does not verify the operator intended this instrument.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Sections5–6 and22; PDF 5,12,33–34; FOI Doc2/3 explicit clock",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-dis-standard",
          "w25-sf-s-foi141"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-contractual-rights",
      "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "target": "w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
      "label": "requires particular terms and appropriate enforcement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-dis-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "Section13 requires terms against class1A/1B use and restriction/removal rights for specified misuse, with appropriate enforcement under specified triggers and subsection6 burden. This is not legal compulsion for every possible private policy or restriction. Technical, encryption and proportionality qualifications elsewhere remain relevant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-contractual-rights",
        "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "target": "w25-sf-high-impact-genai",
        "label": "requires particular terms and appropriate enforcement",
        "detail": "Section13 requires terms against class1A/1B use and restriction/removal rights for specified misuse, with appropriate enforcement under specified triggers and subsection6 burden. This is not legal compulsion for every possible private policy or restriction. Technical, encryption and proportionality qualifications elsewhere remain relevant.",
        "date": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Section13 PDF 24–25; related sections10,19–22 in accepted scoped read",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-dis-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-report-records",
      "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "authorizes bounded reports and requires compliance records",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22",
      "sources": [
        "w25-sf-s-dis-standard"
      ],
      "summary": "Section36 request cannot issue before first anniversary under that section and no more than once per 12 months; two-month response period. Section38 requires records for two years after relevant calendar-year end. Other reporting powers and substantive duties are not postponed by these limits; no request or delivery to a particular service acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-e-dis-report-records",
        "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "authorizes bounded reports and requires compliance records",
        "detail": "Section36 request cannot issue before first anniversary under that section and no more than once per 12 months; two-month response period. Section38 requires records for two years after relevant calendar-year end. Other reporting powers and substantive duties are not postponed by these limits; no request or delivery to a particular service acquired.",
        "date": "2024-12-22 – 2024-12-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sections36–38 PDF 44–46",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-dis-standard"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ohf-implements",
      "source": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "implements the initiative",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-about",
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-company"
      ],
      "summary": "TAT names OHF as implementer; this separates the initiative from its legal company and funders.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ohf-implements",
        "source": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "implements the initiative",
        "detail": "TAT names OHF as implementer; this separates the initiative from its legal company and funders.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "About Governance/implementer; company overview",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-about",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-company"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-operates",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "operates the classification and alerting service",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022",
        "w26-ver-s-tat-verification"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator accounts explain in-house collection/verification and advisory alerts; provider enforcement remains separate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-operates",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "operates the classification and alerting service",
        "detail": "Operator accounts explain in-house collection/verification and advisory alerts; provider enforcement remains separate.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Year 2 PDF 28–29; verification summary",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-verification"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf",
      "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "holds registered voting and director-appointment control",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "PSC notification date; current entry observed 9 September 2026, not a one-day exercise.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-control"
      ],
      "summary": "OHF PSC filing gives QuantSpark at least 75% of voting rights and appointment/removal rights. Guarantee company has no share capital; no item-level instruction inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf",
        "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "label": "holds registered voting and director-appointment control",
        "detail": "OHF PSC filing gives QuantSpark at least 75% of voting rights and appointment/removal rights. Guarantee company has no share capital; no item-level instruction inferred.",
        "date": "PSC notification date; current entry observed 9 September 2026, not a one-day exercise.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Active PSC nature of control",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-control"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-hadley-controls",
      "source": "w26-ver-hadley",
      "target": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "label": "holds registered share, voting and appointment control",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Notification/appointment date; current filed position observed in 2026, not a one-day exercise.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-qs-control",
        "w26-ver-s-qs-officers"
      ],
      "summary": "At least 75% of shares and votes plus director appointment/removal and significant influence/control; exact percentage and other shareholding unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-hadley-controls",
        "source": "w26-ver-hadley",
        "target": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "label": "holds registered share, voting and appointment control",
        "detail": "At least 75% of shares and votes plus director appointment/removal and significant influence/control; exact percentage and other shareholding unknown.",
        "date": "Notification/appointment date; current filed position observed in 2026, not a one-day exercise.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sole active PSC and officer entries",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-qs-control",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-officers"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-hadley-leadership",
      "source": "w26-ver-hadley",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "was described by QuantSpark as also running TAT",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-qs-leadership"
      ],
      "summary": "Company author capsule establishes a reported shared leadership role; it does not specify content-approval powers or an OHF management contract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-hadley-leadership",
        "source": "w26-ver-hadley",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "was described by QuantSpark as also running TAT",
        "detail": "Company author capsule establishes a reported shared leadership role; it does not specify content-approval powers or an OHF management contract.",
        "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "Author capsule",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
            "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-qs-leadership"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-qs-invoicing",
      "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "reported consultancy and other services invoiced to OHF",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025",
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "QS note 10 reports GBP 913,095 net of VAT for FY2025; OHF reports GBP 913,015. Preserve the GBP 80 difference rather than forcing reconciliation or inferring wrongdoing. No cash payment or TCAP-only allocation established. Financial details: value: 913,095; currency: GBP; kind: QS reported services invoiced net of VAT not receipt; period: year ended 31 July 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-qs-invoicing",
        "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "label": "reported consultancy and other services invoiced to OHF",
        "detail": "QS note 10 reports GBP 913,095 net of VAT for FY2025; OHF reports GBP 913,015. Preserve the GBP 80 difference rather than forcing reconciliation or inferring wrongdoing. No cash payment or TCAP-only allocation established.",
        "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "QS PDF 10 note 10; OHF PDF 7 note 7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 913,095; currency: GBP; kind: QS reported services invoiced net of VAT not receipt; period: year ended 31 July 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ohf-invoicing-account",
      "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "was reported by OHF to have invoiced consultancy",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
        "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "OHF note 7 supplies its own GBP 913,015 figure, with VAT basis unspecified. This is the counterparty account of the same relationship, not another additive purchase. Financial details: value: 913,015; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported invoice amount not additive to QS account; period: year ended 31 July 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ohf-invoicing-account",
        "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "label": "was reported by OHF to have invoiced consultancy",
        "detail": "OHF note 7 supplies its own GBP 913,015 figure, with VAT basis unspecified. This is the counterparty account of the same relationship, not another additive purchase.",
        "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "OHF PDF 7 note 7; QS PDF 10 note 10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 913,015; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported invoice amount not additive to QS account; period: year ended 31 July 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ohf-balance",
      "source": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "target": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "label": "reported an outstanding related-party balance",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
        "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "OHF reports GBP 1,554,927 owed. QS separately reports GBP 1,374,157 for services and 180,769 expenses, totaling 1,554,926 by our arithmetic. The GBP 1 difference is unexplained. The entire balance is not characterized as a cash loan; no settlement proved. Financial details: value: 1,554,927; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported amount owed not cash loan total; period: as at 31 July 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ohf-balance",
        "source": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "target": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "label": "reported an outstanding related-party balance",
        "detail": "OHF reports GBP 1,554,927 owed. QS separately reports GBP 1,374,157 for services and 180,769 expenses, totaling 1,554,926 by our arithmetic. The GBP 1 difference is unexplained. The entire balance is not characterized as a cash loan; no settlement proved.",
        "date": "2025-07-31 – 2025-07-31",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "OHF PDF 7 note 7; QS PDF 10 note 10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,554,927; currency: GBP; kind: OHF reported amount owed not cash loan total; period: as at 31 July 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-qs-loan-support",
      "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
      "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "provided loans on which OHF reports relying",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Financial-statement approval/reporting anchor; not loan origination date or perpetual support.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "OHF going-concern note records loan reliance and a director assurance that amounts would not be recalled for the following 12 months. Amount, security, interest, project allocation and exact balance components covered remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-qs-loan-support",
        "source": "w26-ver-quantspark",
        "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "label": "provided loans on which OHF reports relying",
        "detail": "OHF going-concern note records loan reliance and a director assurance that amounts would not be recalled for the following 12 months. Amount, security, interest, project allocation and exact balance components covered remain not obtained.",
        "date": "Financial-statement approval/reporting anchor; not loan origination date or perpetual support.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF 4 note 1.2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-original-value",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w26-ver-ca21415",
      "label": "disclosed the original contribution total",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
        "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
      ],
      "summary": "Original public record states CAD 1,155,622.44 for agreement 21415. Its period is 26 February 2020–30 September 2021. This is an agreement-value disclosure, not a payment. Financial details: value: 1,155,622.44; currency: CAD; kind: original contribution total superseded not payment; period: displayed period 26 February 2020–30 September 2021",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-original-value",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w26-ver-ca21415",
        "label": "disclosed the original contribution total",
        "detail": "Original public record states CAD 1,155,622.44 for agreement 21415. Its period is 26 February 2020–30 September 2021. This is an agreement-value disclosure, not a payment.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Complete record; agreement-value definition",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,155,622.44; currency: CAD; kind: original contribution total superseded not payment; period: displayed period 26 February 2020–30 September 2021"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-amended-value",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w26-ver-ca21415",
      "label": "disclosed an increased total for the same contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-11-22 – 2021-11-22",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
        "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
        "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
      ],
      "summary": "Amended total CAD 1,256,688.09 replaces the earlier total; derived increase CAD 101,065.65 is not another award. Displayed start is 25 February 2020, one day earlier than original; end 31 March 2022. No signed amendment or payment acquired. Financial details: value: 1,256,688.09; currency: CAD; kind: revised total not additive to original not payment; period: agreement 21415 after 22 November 2021 amendment",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-amended-value",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w26-ver-ca21415",
        "label": "disclosed an increased total for the same contribution",
        "detail": "Amended total CAD 1,256,688.09 replaces the earlier total; derived increase CAD 101,065.65 is not another award. Displayed start is 25 February 2020, one day earlier than original; end 31 March 2022. No signed amendment or payment acquired.",
        "date": "2021-11-22 – 2021-11-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Additional Information and agreement fields",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,256,688.09; currency: CAD; kind: revised total not additive to original not payment; period: agreement 21415 after 22 November 2021 amendment"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-recipient",
      "source": "w26-ver-ca21415",
      "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "names the foundation under its former legal name",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
        "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-company"
      ],
      "summary": "Canadian record names QuantSpark Foundation; UK company history supplies the separate crosswalk to OHF company 11656320. The amendment the old label after the UK name change. Not an award to QuantSpark Limited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-recipient",
        "source": "w26-ver-ca21415",
        "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "label": "names the foundation under its former legal name",
        "detail": "Canadian record names QuantSpark Foundation; UK company history supplies the separate crosswalk to OHF company 11656320. The amendment the old label after the UK name change. Not an award to QuantSpark Limited.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Recipient legal-name fields; UK previous-name entry",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-company"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-execution-report",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w26-ver-ca21415",
      "label": "reported signing an initial TCAP funding agreement in 2019–20",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reporting period 2019–20; original publication date unestablished, current page modified 9 April 2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-results2019",
        "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original"
      ],
      "summary": "Departmental report includes a rounded CAD 1 million TAT agreement among signed agreements. Exact signature date and bank receipt absent. Rounded announcement/report figures are not additional allocations on top of disclosure totals.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca21415-execution-report",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w26-ver-ca21415",
        "label": "reported signing an initial TCAP funding agreement in 2019–20",
        "detail": "Departmental report includes a rounded CAD 1 million TAT agreement among signed agreements. Exact signature date and bank receipt absent. Rounded announcement/report figures are not additional allocations on top of disclosure totals.",
        "date": "Reporting period 2019–20; original publication date unestablished, current page modified 9 April 2025.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Countering Radicalization to Violence subsection",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-results2019",
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca22841-value",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w26-ver-ca22841",
      "label": "disclosed and announced the Phase 2 contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Official announcement anchor; exact signature date not stated.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
        "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
        "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
      ],
      "summary": "Government disclosure and 3 May announcement corroborate CAD 1,945,904 for OHF. Two records concern one award. Term 1 April 2023–31 March 2026 is not evidence of completed delivery or cash paid. Financial details: value: 1,945,904; currency: CAD; kind: contribution agreement value not disbursement; period: stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca22841-value",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w26-ver-ca22841",
        "label": "disclosed and announced the Phase 2 contribution",
        "detail": "Government disclosure and 3 May announcement corroborate CAD 1,945,904 for OHF. Two records concern one award. Term 1 April 2023–31 March 2026 is not evidence of completed delivery or cash paid.",
        "date": "Official announcement anchor; exact signature date not stated.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Agreement 22841 complete record; May recipient entry",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
            "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,945,904; currency: CAD; kind: contribution agreement value not disbursement; period: stated period 1 April 2023–31 March 2026"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca22841-recipient",
      "source": "w26-ver-ca22841",
      "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
      "label": "names OHF as the legal recipient",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
        "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
        "w26-ver-s-ohf-company"
      ],
      "summary": "Public record identifies Online Harms Foundation; no Canadian company number appears, so company 11656320 crosswalk remains a separately sourced identity conclusion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca22841-recipient",
        "source": "w26-ver-ca22841",
        "target": "w26-ver-ohf",
        "label": "names OHF as the legal recipient",
        "detail": "Public record identifies Online Harms Foundation; no Canadian company number appears, so company 11656320 crosswalk remains a separately sourced identity conclusion.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Recipient fields and registry identity",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-company"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-ca22841-scope",
      "source": "w26-ver-ca22841",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "specifies archive/classification and moderation-workflow development",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
        "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Two publicly described workstreams identify intended outputs. No cost annex allocates the contribution specifically to Altitude, the LLM, an API or a supplier invoice; no accepted milestone acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-ca22841-scope",
        "source": "w26-ver-ca22841",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "specifies archive/classification and moderation-workflow development",
        "detail": "Two publicly described workstreams identify intended outputs. No cost annex allocates the contribution specifically to Altitude, the LLM, an API or a supplier invoice; no accepted milestone acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Purpose/description of two workstreams",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-crf-approval-rules",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w26-ver-crf-terms",
      "label": "publishes current budget, report and payment conditions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections 8,12–13,15.2 and 15.4 require approved budgets, selection and reporting/payment controls. Section 9 cautions that advisory-board participation is not control. These May 2026 terms are not proven incorporated in 21415 or 22841.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-crf-approval-rules",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w26-ver-crf-terms",
        "label": "publishes current budget, report and payment conditions",
        "detail": "Sections 8,12–13,15.2 and 15.4 require approved budgets, selection and reporting/payment controls. Section 9 cautions that advisory-board participation is not control. These May 2026 terms are not proven incorporated in 21415 or 22841.",
        "date": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sections 8–9,12–13,15.2,15.4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-crf-ip-and-selection",
      "source": "w26-ver-crf-terms",
      "target": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "label": "limits the department’s stated IP and onward-funding rights",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient copyright remains; a permanent nonexclusive royalty-free departmental licence may be given, not automatic ownership. Redistribution needs prior approval while recipients independently choose beneficiaries and are not government agents. No specific licence/redistribution exercise proved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-crf-ip-and-selection",
        "source": "w26-ver-crf-terms",
        "target": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "label": "limits the department’s stated IP and onward-funding rights",
        "detail": "Recipient copyright remains; a permanent nonexclusive royalty-free departmental licence may be given, not automatic ownership. Redistribution needs prior approval while recipients independently choose beneficiaries and are not government agents. No specific licence/redistribution exercise proved.",
        "date": "2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sections 10 and 15.6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-centre-nsc-coordination",
      "source": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
      "target": "w26-ver-us-nsc",
      "label": "coordinated engagement with TAT according to Canada’s status account",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "As-of date of internal status account; released 12 August 2024, not a current 2026 coordination status.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Background column reports Canada Centre work with the US NSC on TAT support for small social-media platforms. Meeting dates and operational instructions unknown; NSC is not identified as the funding agency.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-centre-nsc-coordination",
        "source": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
        "target": "w26-ver-us-nsc",
        "label": "coordinated engagement with TAT according to Canada’s status account",
        "detail": "Background column reports Canada Centre work with the US NSC on TAT support for small social-media platforms. Meeting dates and operational instructions unknown; NSC is not identified as the funding agency.",
        "date": "As-of date of internal status account; released 12 August 2024, not a current 2026 coordination status.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 2, Background / Commitment 36",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-centre-tat-engagement",
      "source": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "engaged TAT on support for smaller platforms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Named intermediary and engagement purpose are explicit in the Canadian record; no classification mandate or joint legal entity is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-centre-tat-engagement",
        "source": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "engaged TAT on support for smaller platforms",
        "detail": "Named intermediary and engagement purpose are explicit in the Canadian record; no classification mandate or joint legal entity is established.",
        "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 2 Background",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-canada-us-funding-report",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
      "label": "reported a US funding process linked to Christchurch commitments",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Next Steps says US funding for TAT was in process. Awarding agency, exact stage, amount, conditions, execution and payment are unspecified. The NSC engagement statement does not identify the NSC as funder.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-canada-us-funding-report",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
        "label": "reported a US funding process linked to Christchurch commitments",
        "detail": "Next Steps says US funding for TAT was in process. Awarding agency, exact stage, amount, conditions, execution and payment are unspecified. The NSC engagement statement does not identify the NSC as funder.",
        "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "PDF 4 Next Steps, continuation from PDF 3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-us-process-beneficiary",
      "source": "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "identified TAT as intended funding recipient",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Canadian department’s October 2023 account of a process, not proof of a completed US award or receipt. No amount is supplied or inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-us-process-beneficiary",
        "source": "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "identified TAT as intended funding recipient",
        "detail": "Canadian department’s October 2023 account of a process, not proof of a completed US award or receipt. No amount is supplied or inferred.",
        "date": "2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF 4 Next Steps",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-centre-launch",
      "source": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
      "label": "hosted the event with the joint TCAP 2.0 launch",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Departmental Next Steps column reports completed launch at the Canada Centre event of 1–5 May 2023. Broader On track status and launch are not grant acceptance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-centre-launch",
        "source": "w26-ver-canada-centre",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
        "label": "hosted the event with the joint TCAP 2.0 launch",
        "detail": "Departmental Next Steps column reports completed launch at the Canada Centre event of 1–5 May 2023. Broader On track status and launch are not grant acceptance.",
        "date": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 3–4 Next Steps; PDF 2 context",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-launch",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
      "label": "partnered in the Canadian launch",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
      ],
      "summary": "The same departmental record identifies TAT as launch partner. No actual project-performance acceptance or instalment payment is established by the event.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-launch",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-launch2023",
        "label": "partnered in the Canadian launch",
        "detail": "The same departmental record identifies TAT as launch partner. No actual project-performance acceptance or instalment payment is established by the event.",
        "date": "2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "PDF 3–4 Next Steps",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-home-office-pilot",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
      "label": "published a pending direct-award pilot notice",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Notice gives discovery, analysis and bulk-referral scope; pending contract, estimated signature 14 September 2026 and term to 15 March 2027. GBP 192,000 ex VAT and 240,000 inc VAT are displayed without reconciliation. No executed agreement or payment. Financial details: value: 192,000; currency: GBP; kind: displayed pending contract value excluding VAT not payment; period: estimated 14 September 2026–15 March 2027",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-home-office-pilot",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
        "label": "published a pending direct-award pilot notice",
        "detail": "Notice gives discovery, analysis and bulk-referral scope; pending contract, estimated signature 14 September 2026 and term to 15 March 2027. GBP 192,000 ex VAT and 240,000 inc VAT are displayed without reconciliation. No executed agreement or payment.",
        "date": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Notice fields and pending/estimated dates",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 192,000; currency: GBP; kind: displayed pending contract value excluding VAT not payment; period: estimated 14 September 2026–15 March 2027"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-pilot-tat-supplier",
      "source": "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "names TAT as proposed supplier",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026"
      ],
      "summary": "The notice names TAT and a supplier PPON; the notice does not establish its company-number signatory or OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-pilot-tat-supplier",
        "source": "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "names TAT as proposed supplier",
        "detail": "The notice names TAT and a supplier PPON; the notice does not establish its company-number signatory or OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms.",
        "date": "2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Supplier name/PPON and pending stage",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-home-office-guide",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
      "label": "issued voluntary provider guidance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Guidance creates no legal obligation, while describing distinct existing legal duties and proportionate measures.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-home-office-guide",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
        "label": "issued voluntary provider guidance",
        "detail": "Guidance creates no legal obligation, while describing distinct existing legal duties and proportionate measures.",
        "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Introduction, how to use, definitions",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-guide-tcap",
      "source": "w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "recommends TCAP where applicable",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Named-tool recommendation and legitimacy route, not mandatory subscription, exclusive provider choice or an individual takedown order.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-guide-tcap",
        "source": "w26-ver-uk-voluntary-guide",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "recommends TCAP where applicable",
        "detail": "Named-tool recommendation and legitimacy route, not mandatory subscription, exclusive provider choice or an individual takedown order.",
        "date": "2024-02-15 – 2024-02-15",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Section 1(3)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-dis-example-tat",
      "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples"
      ],
      "summary": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-dis-example-tat",
        "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
        "detail": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
        "date": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 13 / printed 9, section 6 Note 2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-dis-example-gifct",
      "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples"
      ],
      "summary": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-dis-example-gifct",
        "source": "w25-sf-dis-standard",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "label": "names it as an example of independent expert verification tools",
        "detail": "Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.",
        "date": "DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 13 / printed 9, section 6 Note 2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-verifies",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-policy",
      "label": "applies source and content assessment through in-house experts",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-verification"
      ],
      "summary": "Public summary describes human source/content judgment against policy. Full verification procedure requires a form and was not acquired; no donor item-selection right is supplied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-verifies",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-policy",
        "label": "applies source and content assessment through in-house experts",
        "detail": "Public summary describes human source/content judgment against policy. Full verification procedure requires a form and was not acquired; no donor item-selection right is supplied.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Purpose/source/content paragraphs",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-verification"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tcap-policy-scope",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap-policy",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "sets inclusion, imitation and delisting parameters",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-inclusion",
        "w26-ver-s-tat-designation"
      ],
      "summary": "Selected designation authorities combine with TAT consensus/threat and splinter assessments. Entity removal from all followed lists triggers delisting; historical pre-delisting material continues to be alerted. This is not a worked correction of a false item label.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tcap-policy-scope",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap-policy",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "sets inclusion, imitation and delisting parameters",
        "detail": "Selected designation authorities combine with TAT consensus/threat and splinter assessments. Entity removal from all followed lists triggers delisting; historical pre-delisting material continues to be alerted. This is not a worked correction of a false item label.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Designation narrative, imitation/splinters, delisting",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
            "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-inclusion",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-designation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tcap-status-corrections",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "reported correcting URL-availability statuses after platform disputes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "December 2021–November 2022 reporting period, not a current API service-level promise.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022"
      ],
      "summary": "Year 2 report records 36 disputes, all automated status issues; 35 statuses changed and one remained active. These are not 36 terrorist-label reversals or restored user posts. Response target then was seven working days.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tcap-status-corrections",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "reported correcting URL-availability statuses after platform disputes",
        "detail": "Year 2 report records 36 disputes, all automated status issues; 35 statuses changed and one remained active. These are not 36 terrorist-label reversals or restored user posts. Response target then was seven working days.",
        "date": "December 2021–November 2022 reporting period, not a current API service-level promise.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 29–32",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-funds-tat",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-tat",
      "label": "contributes funding according to TAT’s account",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-about"
      ],
      "summary": "TAT About funding passage names GIFCT support; no amount, period, donor agreement or classification veto is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-funds-tat",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-tat",
        "label": "contributes funding according to TAT’s account",
        "detail": "TAT About funding passage names GIFCT support; no amount, period, donor agreement or classification veto is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Funding section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-board-governs",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "label": "provides strategic oversight",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance"
      ],
      "summary": "Current official governance account gives the Operating Board strategic guidance/oversight; no specific content decision or meeting vote is acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-board-governs",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "label": "provides strategic oversight",
        "detail": "Current official governance account gives the Operating Board strategic guidance/oversight; no specific content decision or meeting vote is acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Current governance substantive board section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-meta-chairs",
      "source": "meta",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "label": "chairs the Operating Board in 2026",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Stated calendar-year role; exact appointment/exercise dates not independently acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance"
      ],
      "summary": "Official page identifies the chair. Chair role alone does not prove a unilateral classification veto or direction to other members.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-meta-chairs",
        "source": "meta",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
        "label": "chairs the Operating Board in 2026",
        "detail": "Official page identifies the chair. Chair role alone does not prove a unilateral classification veto or direction to other members.",
        "date": "Stated calendar-year role; exact appointment/exercise dates not independently acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "2026 Operating Board description",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-dues",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "label": "must pay tiered annual membership dues",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Mandatory dues reported from 2025; current membership page observed September 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Mandatory dues began in 2025; current criteria require annual tiered contributions. The report’s combined member/external total is not attributed wholly to any named company, and no per-member payment amount is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-dues",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "label": "must pay tiered annual membership dues",
        "detail": "Mandatory dues began in 2025; current criteria require annual tiered contributions. The report’s combined member/external total is not attributed wholly to any named company, and no per-member payment amount is inferred.",
        "date": "Mandatory dues reported from 2025; current membership page observed September 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Membership criteria; 2025 report PDF 7–9,30",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-access",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "label": "conditions shared-tool access on membership and agreement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Current criteria include reports/appeals, transparency and rights commitments; HSDB access requires information-sharing agreement. Integrated or integrating does not mean all named members are operational. No private agreement content was acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-access",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "label": "conditions shared-tool access on membership and agreement",
        "detail": "Current criteria include reports/appeals, transparency and rights commitments; HSDB access requires information-sharing agreement. Integrated or integrating does not mean all named members are operational. No private agreement content was acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Membership criteria; annual PDF 11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-access-withdrawal",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "reported taking management and withdrawing five legacy accesses",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022 report period; individual withdrawal dates unspecified.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 report says GIFCT took full management and rescinded access from five legacy nonmembers that did not pursue membership. Historical organizational access change, not current membership count or content removal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-access-withdrawal",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "label": "reported taking management and withdrawing five legacy accesses",
        "detail": "2022 report says GIFCT took full management and rescinded access from five legacy nonmembers that did not pursue membership. Historical organizational access change, not current membership count or content removal.",
        "date": "2022 report period; individual withdrawal dates unspecified.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 23",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-members-contribute",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "contribute qualified hashes and labels",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Member-supplied signals and feedback are documented; GIFCT also can create hashes. Admission under taxonomy is distinct from a platform moderation verdict.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-members-contribute",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "label": "contribute qualified hashes and labels",
        "detail": "Member-supplied signals and feedback are documented; GIFCT also can create hashes. Admission under taxonomy is distinct from a platform moderation verdict.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "HSDB description; annual PDF 11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-contributes",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "can create qualifying hashes itself",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Annual report describes GIFCT hash creation as well as member contributions; no item-specific instance asserted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-contributes",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "label": "can create qualifying hashes itself",
        "detail": "Annual report describes GIFCT hash creation as well as member contributions; no item-specific instance asserted.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF 11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-taxonomy-controls",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-taxonomy",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "defines qualified inclusion routes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022"
      ],
      "summary": "UN list, qualifying incident and behavioral routes have separate predicates. Behavioral classification needs more than an ideological label. December 2022 terminology remains dated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-taxonomy-controls",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-taxonomy",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "label": "defines qualified inclusion routes",
        "detail": "UN list, qualifying incident and behavioral routes have separate predicates. Behavioral classification needs more than an ideological label. December 2022 terminology remains dated.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 3–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tcap-gifct-filter",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "supplies URL-hash inputs subject to GIFCT’s own parameters",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022"
      ],
      "summary": "Taxonomy names TCAP but requires GIFCT inclusion parameters too. This filter defeats an inference that every TCAP label automatically enters HSDB.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tcap-gifct-filter",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "label": "supplies URL-hash inputs subject to GIFCT’s own parameters",
        "detail": "Taxonomy names TCAP but requires GIFCT inclusion parameters too. This filter defeats an inference that every TCAP label automatically enters HSDB.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF 5 URL provision",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-hsdb-provider-discretion",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "label": "supplies matching information while platforms retain decisions",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Cryptographic/perceptual signals assist identification. GIFCT says it does not dictate enforcement; actual provider configuration, review and outcome need separate records.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-hsdb-provider-discretion",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "label": "supplies matching information while platforms retain decisions",
        "detail": "Cryptographic/perceptual signals assist identification. GIFCT says it does not dictate enforcement; actual provider configuration, review and outcome need separate records.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "HSDB body; annual PDF 11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-reported-corrections",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "label": "reported correcting labels and removing hashes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Dated 2022/2025 report accounts, not a verified universal correction service-level agreement.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022",
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 account describes review/sample corrections and a separate nonviolent music-video removal. Another member sees contributor withdrawal at its next access. Nonrandom feedback does not establish a database-wide error rate; no recipient processing or restoration proved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-reported-corrections",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "label": "reported correcting labels and removing hashes",
        "detail": "2022 account describes review/sample corrections and a separate nonviolent music-video removal. Another member sees contributor withdrawal at its next access. Nonrandom feedback does not establish a database-wide error rate; no recipient processing or restoration proved.",
        "date": "Dated 2022/2025 report accounts, not a verified universal correction service-level agreement.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "2022 PDF 32–35; 2025 PDF 13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-iac-advice",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-iac",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "label": "advises on priorities and performance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance"
      ],
      "summary": "Current governance page describes advisory remit, a civil-society majority, a government/intergovernmental minority and a nongovernmental chair. Advice is not a vote, database access or binding classification instruction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-iac-advice",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-iac",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
        "label": "advises on priorities and performance",
        "detail": "Current governance page describes advisory remit, a civil-society majority, a government/intergovernmental minority and a nongovernmental chair. Advice is not a vote, database access or binding classification instruction.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Current IAC section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-appointments",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "label": "describes appointment endorsement and response duties in a draft",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Draft terms contemplate Board endorsement, formal responses to advice, reciprocal summarized minutes and a nonvoting IAC chair. Adoption and actual appointment/response decisions not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-appointments",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
        "label": "describes appointment endorsement and response duties in a draft",
        "detail": "Draft terms contemplate Board endorsement, formal responses to advice, reciprocal summarized minutes and a nonvoting IAC chair. Adoption and actual appointment/response decisions not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 1–5, including draft label",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-support",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-iac",
      "label": "describes funded participation and conflict safeguards in a draft",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft"
      ],
      "summary": "Draft terms provide GIFCT support/remuneration and disclosure/recusal rules with exceptions. This disclosed dependency is not proof of compromised judgment or an operative adopted charter.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-iac-draft-support",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-iac",
        "label": "describes funded participation and conflict safeguards in a draft",
        "detail": "Draft terms provide GIFCT support/remuneration and disclosure/recusal rules with exceptions. This disclosed dependency is not proof of compromised judgment or an operative adopted charter.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 1–7, especially 1–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-code-sanctions",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-code",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "label": "sets leadership and Board consultation procedures for sanctions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022"
      ],
      "summary": "Public Code allows warnings/corrections and temporary/permanent technology or membership restrictions after consultation. Detailed acceptable-use examples are omitted; no specific sanction exercise established here.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-code-sanctions",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-code",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "label": "sets leadership and Board consultation procedures for sanctions",
        "detail": "Public Code allows warnings/corrections and temporary/permanent technology or membership restrictions after consultation. Detailed acceptable-use examples are omitted; no specific sanction exercise established here.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 2–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-member-appeal",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
      "label": "may appeal organizational sanctions through the Code process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022"
      ],
      "summary": "Organization has 10 business days after notice to appeal; Board has 30 business days to affirm, change or reverse, potentially consulting IAC. Final within that process; not a content author’s platform remedy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-member-appeal",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-members",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-board",
        "label": "may appeal organizational sanctions through the Code process",
        "detail": "Organization has 10 business days after notice to appeal; Board has 30 business days to affirm, change or reverse, potentially consulting IAC. Final within that process; not a content author’s platform remedy.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF 5 appeal procedure",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-hria-commission",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
      "label": "commissioned and paid for the human-rights assessment",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Assessment work December 2020–May 2021; exact payment date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021"
      ],
      "summary": "BSR editorial control. No amount or contract terms acquired; paid assessment is not a demonstration of assessor direction or a completed audit of member outcomes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-hria-commission",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
        "label": "commissioned and paid for the human-rights assessment",
        "detail": "BSR editorial control. No amount or contract terms acquired; paid assessment is not a demonstration of assessor direction or a completed audit of member outcomes.",
        "date": "Assessment work December 2020–May 2021; exact payment date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Commissioning/editorial-control passage within scoped PDF 3–10 read",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-bsr-assessment",
      "source": "w22-sig-bsr",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
      "label": "conducted the assessment with editorial control",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021 assessment; no original after the recorded 403.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021"
      ],
      "summary": "Scoped assessment emphasized future organizational risks and recommended appeals, holds, external review and downstream transparency. It is not a current incident finding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-bsr-assessment",
        "source": "w22-sig-bsr",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
        "label": "conducted the assessment with editorial control",
        "detail": "Scoped assessment emphasized future organizational risks and recommended appeals, holds, external review and downstream transparency. It is not a current incident finding.",
        "date": "2021 assessment; no original after the recorded 403.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Scoped opening and recommendations PDF 38–48,63–65",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-response",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
      "label": "responded with completed changes and further commitments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-07-20 – 2021-07-20",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-response2021"
      ],
      "summary": "July 2021 response says membership criteria/appeals had been revised while other human-review, external review, research and governance work remained longer-term or exploratory. Do not treat every promise as completed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-response",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hria",
        "label": "responded with completed changes and further commitments",
        "detail": "July 2021 response says membership criteria/appeals had been revised while other human-review, external review, research and governance work remained longer-term or exploratory. Do not treat every promise as completed.",
        "date": "2021-07-20 – 2021-07-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Complete response, lines 75–173",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-response2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-policy-update",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hr-policy",
      "label": "updated its public human-rights policy in May 2026",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy states May 2026 update; exact day unknown despite older URL path.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-policy2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Updated policy assigns assessment, action, tracking and communication activities. Annex measures/risk register are commitments, not observed measurements or user remedy outcomes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-gifct-policy-update",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-hr-policy",
        "label": "updated its public human-rights policy in May 2026",
        "detail": "Updated policy assigns assessment, action, tracking and communication activities. Annex measures/risk register are commitments, not observed measurements or user remedy outcomes.",
        "date": "Policy states May 2026 update; exact day unknown despite older URL path.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF 3 update statement and PDF 5 annex",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-policy2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-map-transition",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
      "target": "w26-ver-gifct-map",
      "label": "announced transfer of BSR-delivered rights services into MAP",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-18 – 2026-05-18",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-update2026",
        "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
      ],
      "summary": "MAP’s 2025 launch and five 2025 BSR company reviews are separate from the May 2026 announced service transition. Its completed handover date and five-year assessment report were not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-map-transition",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct",
        "target": "w26-ver-gifct-map",
        "label": "announced transfer of BSR-delivered rights services into MAP",
        "detail": "MAP’s 2025 launch and five 2025 BSR company reviews are separate from the May 2026 announced service transition. Its completed handover date and five-year assessment report were not acquired.",
        "date": "2026-05-18 – 2026-05-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Update Looking Ahead; annual PDF 8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-update2026",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-archive",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
      "label": "reported building an archive and reusable hash interfaces",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-20 – 2024-12-20",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024"
      ],
      "summary": "December 2024 operator account reports over 46,000 files and 182,000 hashes, distinct units. It attributes LLM identification/classification support to Public Safety Canada without a cost allocation or acceptance record.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-archive",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
        "label": "reported building an archive and reusable hash interfaces",
        "detail": "December 2024 operator account reports over 46,000 files and 182,000 hashes, distinct units. It attributes LLM identification/classification support to Public Safety Canada without a cost allocation or acceptance record.",
        "date": "2024-12-20 – 2024-12-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Archive/classification/hash API passages",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-relaunch",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "reported a March 2025 interface relaunch and later sharing activity",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report publication anchor; March relaunch and other activity occurred at separately described times.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-review2025"
      ],
      "summary": "December update reports added archive files and sharing with about six large technology companies. No actual recipient roster, audit or correction case supplied; cumulative and limited-period counts are not combined.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-reported-relaunch",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "reported a March 2025 interface relaunch and later sharing activity",
        "detail": "December update reports added archive files and sharing with about six large technology companies. No actual recipient roster, audit or correction case supplied; cumulative and limited-period counts are not combined.",
        "date": "Report publication anchor; March relaunch and other activity occurred at separately described times.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Relaunch, archive and sharing passages",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-microsoft-pilot",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "was named in TAT’s account of an AI-detection pilot",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-12-21 – 2023-12-21",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023"
      ],
      "summary": "TAT’s 2023 review describes the Microsoft pilot. No Microsoft-side acceptance, deployed model version, financial value or completed validation result acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-microsoft-pilot",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "was named in TAT’s account of an AI-detection pilot",
        "detail": "TAT’s 2023 review describes the Microsoft pilot. No Microsoft-side acceptance, deployed model version, financial value or completed validation result acquired.",
        "date": "2023-12-21 – 2023-12-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "AI-detection pilot passage",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-archive-research-access",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
      "target": "w26-ver-archive-audience",
      "label": "advertises access for platforms and researchers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-archive-product",
        "w26-ver-s-archive-policy-shell"
      ],
      "summary": "Product explanation describes media access, not a current download or onward-use licence. The endpoint represents the advertised audience; neither a named admitted organization nor an executed access agreement is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-archive-research-access",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
        "target": "w26-ver-archive-audience",
        "label": "advertises access for platforms and researchers",
        "detail": "Product explanation describes media access, not a current download or onward-use licence. The endpoint represents the advertised audience; neither a named admitted organization nor an executed access agreement is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Research product body; inspected Archive policy shell",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
            "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-product",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-policy-shell"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-archive-hash-export",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
      "label": "supplies the content fingerprints described by the API",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api",
        "w26-ver-s-archive-product"
      ],
      "summary": "Current public documentation describes bulk fingerprints with classification/file metadata and updates. Media access, restricted database credentials and software licensing remain separate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-archive-hash-export",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
        "label": "supplies the content fingerprints described by the API",
        "detail": "Current public documentation describes bulk fingerprints with classification/file metadata and updates. Media access, restricted database credentials and software licensing remain separate.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Hash API key features, metadata fields",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-product"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-api-onboarding",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
      "label": "requires prior onboarding for authenticated API use",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-archive-auth"
      ],
      "summary": "Authentication introduction presupposes an existing onboarded TCAP or Archive account. It does not publish the current decision-maker, full eligibility contract or unrestricted access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-api-onboarding",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
        "label": "requires prior onboarding for authenticated API use",
        "detail": "Authentication introduction presupposes an existing onboarded TCAP or Archive account. It does not publish the current decision-maker, full eligibility contract or unrestricted access.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Introduction and service lists",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-auth"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-api-feedback-route",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
      "label": "provides authenticated per-hash error and inclusion feedback",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback",
        "w26-ver-s-archive-auth"
      ],
      "summary": "Hash-list users may report individual-hash problems and retrieve their own analyst response/decision. Example counts, names and timestamps are illustrative, not actual cases or volume.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-api-feedback-route",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
        "label": "provides authenticated per-hash error and inclusion feedback",
        "detail": "Hash-list users may report individual-hash problems and retrieve their own analyst response/decision. Example counts, names and timestamps are illustrative, not actual cases or volume.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Overview, Feedback Status and response fields",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-auth"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
      "label": "describes analyst review and an email-response aim",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback"
      ],
      "summary": "Analyst decisions include removal, non-removal and pending. Reply aim is three to five working days by onboarding email; no actual deadline performance or independent appeal procedure established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
        "label": "describes analyst review and an email-response aim",
        "detail": "Analyst decisions include removal, non-removal and pending. Reply aim is three to five working days by onboarding email; no actual deadline performance or independent appeal procedure established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Feedback Object; Response notifications",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
      "target": "w26-ver-hash-recipient",
      "label": "documents withdrawal metadata and incremental update handling",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api"
      ],
      "summary": "Hash records carry deleted and updated_on fields; checkpointing supports recipient caches and monitoring deprecated values is recommended. This interface can convey withdrawal, but recipient synchronization, erasure or reopening prior restrictions is unobserved. The documented output is withdrawal metadata for a recipient, not a command that restores an account or proof that a recipient applied it.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
        "target": "w26-ver-hash-recipient",
        "label": "documents withdrawal metadata and incremental update handling",
        "detail": "Hash records carry deleted and updated_on fields; checkpointing supports recipient caches and monitoring deprecated values is recommended. This interface can convey withdrawal, but recipient synchronization, erasure or reopening prior restrictions is unobserved. The documented output is withdrawal metadata for a recipient, not a command that restores an account or proof that a recipient applied it.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Hash Object Fields, Implementation Notes, Best Practices",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tfp-referrals",
      "source": "w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "advertises vetted partner referrals into the alerting workflow",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tfp-product"
      ],
      "summary": "TAT describes categorized partner URL submissions with analyst/AI review and metadata for platform requests. Five-tier/125-plus-platform claims are advertised capabilities, not proof of universal integration or mandatory takedown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tfp-referrals",
        "source": "w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "advertises vetted partner referrals into the alerting workflow",
        "detail": "TAT describes categorized partner URL submissions with analyst/AI review and metadata for platform requests. Five-tier/125-plus-platform claims are advertised capabilities, not proof of universal integration or mandatory takedown.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Body lines 4–16,30–50",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tfp-product"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tfp-archive",
      "source": "w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
      "label": "advertises expansion of the archive and hash lists",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-tfp-product"
      ],
      "summary": "Public product page identifies a contribution path. It does not say every submitted URL is included or disclose the exact admission/permissions matrix.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tfp-archive",
        "source": "w26-ver-trusted-flagger",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
        "label": "advertises expansion of the archive and hash lists",
        "detail": "Public product page identifies a contribution path. It does not say every submitted URL is included or disclose the exact admission/permissions matrix.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Benefits for trusted flaggers, lines 30–39",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tfp-product"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-google-altitude",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "label": "was named as Jigsaw collaborator in Altitude development",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
        "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023",
        "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024"
      ],
      "summary": "TAT announcement and reviews attribute co-development to Google Jigsaw and continuing advisory support. Existing Google identity reused with Jigsaw scope; no current unilateral repository veto, deployment or Canadian allocation inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-google-altitude",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "label": "was named as Jigsaw collaborator in Altitude development",
        "detail": "TAT announcement and reviews attribute co-development to Google Jigsaw and continuing advisory support. Existing Google identity reused with Jigsaw scope; no current unilateral repository veto, deployment or Canadian allocation inferred.",
        "date": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Stewardship announcement; 2023/2024 review passages",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-altitude-stewardship",
      "source": "w26-ver-tat",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "label": "announced it would lead maintenance and development",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-product"
      ],
      "summary": "July announcement assigns prospective stewardship to TAT with Jigsaw advisory support. Repository namespace and last observed main commit do not prove present operational vetoes or that no other development exists.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-tat-altitude-stewardship",
        "source": "w26-ver-tat",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "label": "announced it would lead maintenance and development",
        "detail": "July announcement assigns prospective stewardship to TAT with Jigsaw advisory support. Repository namespace and last observed main commit do not prove present operational vetoes or that no other development exists.",
        "date": "2024-07-22 – 2024-07-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "22 July 2024 announcement and current product repository link",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
            "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-product"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-software-rights",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
      "label": "permits software adaptation subject to Apache 2.0 conditions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Inspected commit date, not customer deployment or contract date.",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-license",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-contribution",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme"
      ],
      "summary": "Pinned licence permits reproduction/modification/distribution subject to conditions and warranty limits. Contribution instructions separately require CLA/review; final approvers/permissions were not acquired. Software permission grants no restricted source-database access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-software-rights",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
        "label": "permits software adaptation subject to Apache 2.0 conditions",
        "detail": "Pinned licence permits reproduction/modification/distribution subject to conditions and warranty limits. Contribution instructions separately require CLA/review; final approvers/permissions were not acquired. Software permission grants no restricted source-database access.",
        "date": "Inspected commit date, not customer deployment or contract date.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Licence sections 2–9; CONTRIBUTING 8–30; README 7–18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-license",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-contribution",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input",
      "source": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "label": "supplies URL-alert metadata in the inspected adapter",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 adapter imports source identifier/report date, group text, flags, URL and availability. This is the older URL-alert interface; it is not evidence of current content-hash deletion handling or ignored corrections.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input",
        "source": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "label": "supplies URL-alert metadata in the inspected adapter",
        "detail": "2024 adapter imports source identifier/report date, group text, flags, URL and availability. This is the older URL-alert interface; it is not evidence of current content-hash deletion handling or ignored corrections.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "tcap_api.py 141–182",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-gifct-input",
      "source": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "label": "is a separately credentialed source described by Altitude",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "README requires obtaining GIFCT credentials. No exact GIFCT adapter payload or actual deployment was inspected; do not inherit TCAP payload semantics.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-gifct-input",
        "source": "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "label": "is a separately credentialed source described by Altitude",
        "detail": "README requires obtaining GIFCT credentials. No exact GIFCT adapter payload or actual deployment was inspected; do not inherit TCAP payload semantics.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "README 7–18; FAQ source configuration",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-trust-priority",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "treats TCAP as trusted in its confidence heuristic",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-priority",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "Pinned code assigns confidence component 3 for TCAP or other qualifying evidence. Separate severity contributes to priority, so TCAP alone does not guarantee top overall rank. Neither confidence nor queue rank is a moderation verdict or calibrated probability.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-trust-priority",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "treats TCAP as trusted in its confidence heuristic",
        "detail": "Pinned code assigns confidence component 3 for TCAP or other qualifying evidence. Separate severity contributes to priority, so TCAP alone does not guarantee top overall rank. Neither confidence nor queue rank is a moderation verdict or calibrated probability.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "case_priority.py 24–135; FAQ 29–64",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-priority",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-operator-choices",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "label": "configures access, source connections and moderation choices",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-import-config"
      ],
      "summary": "Integrator supplies authentication and source credentials. New connections default active with diagnostics inactive after credential pre-check. These static defaults do not identify any customer’s actual consent, roles or source access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-operator-choices",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "label": "configures access, source connections and moderation choices",
        "detail": "Integrator supplies authentication and source credentials. New connections default active with diagnostics inactive after credential pre-check. These static defaults do not identify any customer’s actual consent, roles or source access.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FAQ 90–104; importer.py 73–133",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-import-config"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-review-delivery",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
      "label": "schedules reviewed verdict publication and conditional delivery",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks"
      ],
      "summary": "Draft review publication is scheduled after 60 seconds; draft cancellation is allowed, published deletion is not available through that endpoint. Configured receiver gets a verdict; without it a local log is written. Either branch can produce internal ACCEPTED, not demonstrated live removal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-review-delivery",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
        "label": "schedules reviewed verdict publication and conditional delivery",
        "detail": "Draft review publication is scheduled after 60 seconds; draft cancellation is allowed, published deletion is not available through that endpoint. Configured receiver gets a verdict; without it a local log is written. Either branch can produce internal ACCEPTED, not demonstrated live removal.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "review.py 47–137; tasks.py 522–604",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-receiver-responsibility",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
      "label": "requires the platform’s implementation to give verdicts effect",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "The platform decides what a delivered verdict does. Appending a later review is statically possible, but no user appeal, executed takedown, restoration or recipient acceptance test was observed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-receiver-responsibility",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
        "label": "requires the platform’s implementation to give verdicts effect",
        "detail": "The platform decides what a delivered verdict does. Appending a later review is statically possible, but no user appeal, executed takedown, restoration or recipient acceptance test was observed.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "review.py 47–87; tasks.py 522–604; FAQ 106–113",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-optional-feedback",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
      "label": "can return optional URL and decision diagnostics",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter"
      ],
      "summary": "Export requires diagnostics active and maps BLOCK to REMOVE. Selection uses the latest review in the interval without the inspected condition requiring published state or successful downstream delivery. This is code semantics, not observed false reporting or TCAP acceptance of a disagreement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-optional-feedback",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "target": "w26-ver-tcap",
        "label": "can return optional URL and decision diagnostics",
        "detail": "Export requires diagnostics active and maps BLOCK to REMOVE. Selection uses the latest review in the interval without the inspected condition requiring published state or successful downstream delivery. This is code semantics, not observed false reporting or TCAP acceptance of a disagreement.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "tasks.py 701–738; importer.py 82–149; tcap_api.py 227–254",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-redaction-boundary",
      "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
      "target": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
      "label": "contains a generic source-redaction hook but no demonstrated restoration chain",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
      "sources": [
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer",
        "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter"
      ],
      "summary": "Generic importer can call source-specific redaction on DELETE; the method implementation was not read. Inspected TCAP adapter yields UPDATE_OR_INSERT and its ACT/INA means URL availability, not withdrawn classification. Different interfaces/versions preclude treating this as failure of the current hash-deletion API.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-e-altitude-redaction-boundary",
        "source": "w26-ver-altitude",
        "target": "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
        "label": "contains a generic source-redaction hook but no demonstrated restoration chain",
        "detail": "Generic importer can call source-specific redaction on DELETE; the method implementation was not read. Inspected TCAP adapter yields UPDATE_OR_INSERT and its ACT/INA means URL availability, not withdrawn classification. Different interfaces/versions preclude treating this as failure of the current hash-deletion API.",
        "date": "2024-08-08 – 2024-08-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "importer.py 156–195; tcap_api.py 111–118,182",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-proposal-capacity",
      "source": "w27-roost-proposal2023",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "proposed a separate legal capacity and oversight split",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Summit proposal year, not Foundation incorporation or adoption date.",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-proposal2023"
      ],
      "summary": "The 2023 proposal sought broader funding, global hiring and secondments outside government public-finance constraints. Board corporate/financial oversight and Leaders programme direction were proposed; founding appointment rights were left to founding documents.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-proposal-capacity",
        "source": "w27-roost-proposal2023",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "proposed a separate legal capacity and oversight split",
        "detail": "The 2023 proposal sought broader funding, global hiring and secondments outside government public-finance constraints. Board corporate/financial oversight and Leaders programme direction were proposed; founding appointment rights were left to founding documents.",
        "date": "Summit proposal year, not Foundation incorporation or adoption date.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Main text PDF 3–8, especially PDF 5 / printed 3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-proposal2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-leaders-direction",
      "source": "w27-roost-call-leaders",
      "target": "w27-roost-call",
      "label": "were described as retaining programme direction",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Announcement anchor; not expiry or complete current procedure.",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
        "w27-roost-s-call-priorities"
      ],
      "summary": "Joint May 2024 launch multi-sector Leaders direction; current priorities repeats community direction. Exact electorate, voting rule and actual decisions not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-leaders-direction",
        "source": "w27-roost-call-leaders",
        "target": "w27-roost-call",
        "label": "were described as retaining programme direction",
        "detail": "Joint May 2024 launch multi-sector Leaders direction; current priorities repeats community direction. Exact electorate, voting rule and actual decisions not established.",
        "date": "Announcement anchor; not expiry or complete current procedure.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Joint statement Notes; current priorities substantive body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
          "w27-roost-s-call-priorities"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-call-entry",
      "source": "w27-roost-call-leaders",
      "target": "w27-roost-call",
      "label": "make the final entry decision in the published joining process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-join-call"
      ],
      "summary": "Legacy undated process follows introduction, written intent, cleared applicant response and confidential community discussion. Secretariat convenes; a community participant is not automatically a veto-holder. Current operation and appeal rule unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-call-entry",
        "source": "w27-roost-call-leaders",
        "target": "w27-roost-call",
        "label": "make the final entry decision in the published joining process",
        "detail": "Legacy undated process follows introduction, written intent, cleared applicant response and confidential community discussion. Secretariat convenes; a community participant is not automatically a veto-holder. Current operation and appeal rule unverified.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Join the Call reader lines 14–53",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-join-call"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-secretariat-handoff",
      "source": "w27-roost-support-secretariat",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "was announced and retrospectively reported as transitioned",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-07-01 – 2024-07-01",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
        "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition"
      ],
      "summary": "14 May announcement gave 1 July 2024 for Foundation support functions; MFAT annual report confirms transition in its retrospective account. No staff, asset, IP or contract novation instrument acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-secretariat-handoff",
        "source": "w27-roost-support-secretariat",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "was announced and retrospectively reported as transitioned",
        "detail": "14 May announcement gave 1 July 2024 for Foundation support functions; MFAT annual report confirms transition in its retrospective account. No staff, asset, IP or contract novation instrument acquired.",
        "date": "2024-07-01 – 2024-07-01",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Joint statement body/Notes; MFAT PDF 66",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
          "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-nz-support-end",
      "source": "w27-roost-mfat",
      "target": "w27-roost-support-secretariat",
      "label": "reported the support transition and government-funding endpoint",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-06-30 – 2024-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
        "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition"
      ],
      "summary": "Joint statement said New Zealand taxpayer funding would end 30 June 2024; MFAT retrospectively reported transitioned support. This is not a finding about every later NZ-related grant or receipt.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-nz-support-end",
        "source": "w27-roost-mfat",
        "target": "w27-roost-support-secretariat",
        "label": "reported the support transition and government-funding endpoint",
        "detail": "Joint statement said New Zealand taxpayer funding would end 30 June 2024; MFAT retrospectively reported transitioned support. This is not a finding about every later NZ-related grant or receipt.",
        "date": "2024-06-30 – 2024-06-30",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Joint statement funding paragraph; MFAT PDF 66",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
          "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-mfat-costs",
      "source": "w27-roost-mfat",
      "target": "w27-roost-call",
      "label": "disclosed department-only historic expenditure",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-04 – 2024-04-04",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-mfat-costs"
      ],
      "summary": "OIA actuals are MFAT-only NZD expenditure through 29 February 2024, not Foundation capitalization or complete multi-party programme costs. Fiscal rows retain their distinct periods.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-mfat-costs",
        "source": "w27-roost-mfat",
        "target": "w27-roost-call",
        "label": "disclosed department-only historic expenditure",
        "detail": "OIA actuals are MFAT-only NZD expenditure through 29 February 2024, not Foundation capitalization or complete multi-party programme costs. Fiscal rows retain their distinct periods.",
        "date": "2024-04-04 – 2024-04-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "PDF 2 Appendix A, visually checked",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
            "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-mfat-costs"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-core",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccan-core",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
      "label": "governs its own admissions, statements and internal decisions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Labelled last-update month, not independently verified adoption date.",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "December 2025-labelled terms set a Core of at most 25 and co-chair elections. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-core",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccan-core",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
        "label": "governs its own admissions, statements and internal decisions",
        "detail": "December 2025-labelled terms set a Core of at most 25 and co-chair elections. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings.",
        "date": "Labelled last-update month, not independently verified adoption date.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "All 15 pages; sections 3–7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-advice",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccan",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "requests consultation and reasons for rejected advice",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-advice",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccan",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "requests consultation and reasons for rejected advice",
        "detail": "Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section 8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-funding",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
      "label": "is described as providing advisory-network funding",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. Amount, identity of payer/fundholder and executed memorandum remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-funding",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
        "label": "is described as providing advisory-network funding",
        "detail": "Terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. Amount, identity of payer/fundholder and executed memorandum remain not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Section 9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-custody",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
      "label": "is assigned operational fund custody in published terms",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Unnamed member-organization role holds funds under an agreed memorandum. This is not proof of a particular bank transfer, signed contract or named intermediary.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-custody",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
        "label": "is assigned operational fund custody in published terms",
        "detail": "Unnamed member-organization role holds funds under an agreed memorandum. This is not proof of a particular bank transfer, signed contract or named intermediary.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Section 9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-use",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccan-core",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
      "label": "approves funding applications and fund-use rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Core decisions constrain internal applications/use under the published terms. Exact memorandum, account signatories, expenditure and enforcement were not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-use",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccan-core",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
        "label": "approves funding applications and fund-use rules",
        "detail": "Core decisions constrain internal applications/use under the published terms. Exact memorandum, account signatories, expenditure and enforcement were not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section 9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-review",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
      "label": "reviews and gives feedback on amended terms",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
      ],
      "summary": "Section 10 supplies a review/feedback route without an express Foundation approval veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccan-review",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccan",
        "label": "reviews and gives feedback on amended terms",
        "detail": "Section 10 supplies a review/feedback route without an express Foundation approval veto.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section 10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-packard-support",
      "source": "w27-roost-packard",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "publishes a 2024 general-support grant entry",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-packard2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Entry displays $350,000 and Term 36. Neither currency nor term unit is explicitly labelled in the card; no receipt or donor instruction right established. Financial details: value: 350,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-packard-support",
        "source": "w27-roost-packard",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "publishes a 2024 general-support grant entry",
        "detail": "Entry displays $350,000 and Term 36. Neither currency nor term unit is explicitly labelled in the card; no receipt or donor instruction right established.",
        "date": "2024",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Complete grant card",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
            "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-packard2024"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 350,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-carnegie2024",
      "source": "w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "publishes a launch grant dated 12 December 2024",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-12-12 – 2024-12-12",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-carnegie2024",
        "w27-roost-s-transition-france"
      ],
      "summary": "Donor database displays $500,000 over 12 months. Dollar currency unlabelled. Its spinout-in-2023 description differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; preparation versus operation remains a possible explanation, not a settled correction. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 12 months",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-carnegie2024",
        "source": "w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "publishes a launch grant dated 12 December 2024",
        "detail": "Donor database displays $500,000 over 12 months. Dollar currency unlabelled. Its spinout-in-2023 description differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; preparation versus operation remains a possible explanation, not a settled correction.",
        "date": "2024-12-12 – 2024-12-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Grant entry reader lines 152–194; joint launch",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-carnegie2024",
          "w27-roost-s-transition-france"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 500,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 12 months"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-carnegie2026",
      "source": "w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "announced trustee approval of a further grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-05 – 2026-03-05",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-carnegie2026"
      ],
      "summary": "5 March 2026 trustee approval was announced 10 March: $2 million over 24 months. Approval is not payment or a donor-controlled policy seat; currency not explicitly annotated. Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: unknown; kind: approved grant; period: 24 months",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-carnegie2026",
        "source": "w27-roost-carnegie-ny",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "announced trustee approval of a further grant",
        "detail": "5 March 2026 trustee approval was announced 10 March: $2 million over 24 months. Approval is not payment or a donor-controlled policy seat; currency not explicitly annotated.",
        "date": "2026-03-05 – 2026-03-05",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Reader approval introduction 30–34; CCF entry 67–68",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
            "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-carnegie2026"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 2,000,000; currency: unknown; kind: approved grant; period: 24 months"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pivotal-support",
      "source": "w27-roost-pivotal-leaders-fund",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "is named by CCF as a support channel",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccf-funding"
      ],
      "summary": "Current recipient page acknowledges support through Pivotal Leaders Fund. Amount, legal paying entity, restrictions and receipt not acquired; no equivalency or European intermediary instrument inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pivotal-support",
        "source": "w27-roost-pivotal-leaders-fund",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "is named by CCF as a support channel",
        "detail": "Current recipient page acknowledges support through Pivotal Leaders Fund. Amount, legal paying entity, restrictions and receipt not acquired; no equivalency or European intermediary instrument inferred.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Indexed substantive funding body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-funding"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-canada-award",
      "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
      "target": "w27-roost-canada26007",
      "label": "disclosed a contribution agreement value and expected results",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-23 – 2028-03-31",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
      ],
      "summary": "Record 26007 displays CAD 1,369,064, term 23 October 2025–31 March 2028. Disclosure establishes awarded/agreement value, not disbursement or acceptance of all work. Financial details: value: 1,369,064; currency: CAD; kind: disclosed contribution value; period: 23 October 2025–31 March 2028",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-canada-award",
        "source": "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
        "target": "w27-roost-canada26007",
        "label": "disclosed a contribution agreement value and expected results",
        "detail": "Record 26007 displays CAD 1,369,064, term 23 October 2025–31 March 2028. Disclosure establishes awarded/agreement value, not disbursement or acceptance of all work.",
        "date": "2025-10-23 – 2028-03-31",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Complete contribution detail record",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,369,064; currency: CAD; kind: disclosed contribution value; period: 23 October 2025–31 March 2028"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-canada-recipient",
      "source": "w27-roost-canada26007",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "label": "names CCF as recipient",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
      ],
      "summary": "The legal recipient is The Christchurch Call Foundation. A ROOST partnership purpose does not turn the whole award into a ROOST payment or identify a subaward.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-canada-recipient",
        "source": "w27-roost-canada26007",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "label": "names CCF as recipient",
        "detail": "The legal recipient is The Christchurch Call Foundation. A ROOST partnership purpose does not turn the whole award into a ROOST payment or identify a subaward.",
        "date": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Recipient and expected-results fields",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-canada-workstreams",
      "source": "w27-roost-canada26007",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
      "label": "specifies expected new-sector, ROOST and community work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-canada26007",
        "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Official expected results and CCF November account describe three workstreams. This is prospective scope, not government approval of particular classification rules or accepted code.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-canada-workstreams",
        "source": "w27-roost-canada26007",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
        "label": "specifies expected new-sector, ROOST and community work",
        "detail": "Official expected results and CCF November account describe three workstreams. This is prospective scope, not government approval of particular classification rules or accepted code.",
        "date": "2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Expected results; CCF reader lines 14–43",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-canada26007",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccf-programme",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
      "label": "describes its Elevate programme",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-11-12 – 2025-11-12",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025",
        "w27-roost-s-ccf-elevate"
      ],
      "summary": "CCF programme connects contribution support, standards/benchmarks, ROOST tools and community uptake. Exact implementation/acceptance schedules absent; separate from the Coalition consulting service.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccf-programme",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
        "label": "describes its Elevate programme",
        "detail": "CCF programme connects contribution support, standards/benchmarks, ROOST tools and community uptake. Exact implementation/acceptance schedules absent; separate from the Coalition consulting service.",
        "date": "2025-11-12 – 2025-11-12",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "November announcement; current programme substantive body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-elevate"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccf-roost",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "announced a technical and information collaboration",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-ccf-roost-reprint",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
        "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
      ],
      "summary": "CCF-authored authorized reprint displayed 10 February 2025, index 12 February, precedes the October Canadian award. Later award scope supports a partnership purpose but supplies no ROOST subaward, budget or deliverable approval agreement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccf-roost",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "announced a technical and information collaboration",
        "detail": "CCF-authored authorized reprint displayed 10 February 2025, index 12 February, precedes the October Canadian award. Later award scope supports a partnership purpose but supplies no ROOST subaward, budget or deliverable approval agreement.",
        "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Reprint body/editorial note; launch letter CCF paragraph; expected results",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-roost-reprint",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
          "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-columbia-incubation",
      "source": "w27-roost-columbia-igp",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "reported incubation and intended nonprofit independence",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-19 – 2025-02-19",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-columbia-incubation"
      ],
      "summary": "Columbia describes incubation within IGP and prospective independent operation while collaborating. This is an institutional account, not an ownership, asset-transfer or reserved-rights instrument.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-columbia-incubation",
        "source": "w27-roost-columbia-igp",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "reported incubation and intended nonprofit independence",
        "detail": "Columbia describes incubation within IGP and prospective independent operation while collaborating. This is an institutional account, not an ownership, asset-transfer or reserved-rights instrument.",
        "date": "2025-02-19 – 2025-02-19",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Reader lines 136–156",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
            "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-columbia-incubation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-employment",
      "source": "w27-roost-global-impact",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "is the advertised US employer for a ROOST-linked vacancy",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-careers",
        "w27-roost-s-global-impact-employment"
      ],
      "summary": "The current Marketing Manager posting says Global Impact employs US individuals on behalf of ROOST; position reports to ROOST COO. No filled role, universal staffing arrangement, fiscal sponsorship or grant ownership established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-employment",
        "source": "w27-roost-global-impact",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "is the advertised US employer for a ROOST-linked vacancy",
        "detail": "The current Marketing Manager posting says Global Impact employs US individuals on behalf of ROOST; position reports to ROOST COO. No filled role, universal staffing arrangement, fiscal sponsorship or grant ownership established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Actual Careers hyperlink; job Compensation and Structure",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/careers"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
            "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-careers",
          "w27-roost-s-global-impact-employment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-board-roost",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost-board",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "is the published governing board",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-launch"
      ],
      "summary": "Current team names individual members and affiliations. December 2025 inaugural-board announcement does not establish first existence because February launch already named a chair. Corporate reserved seats, donor vetoes, appointment/removal and budget rules remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-board-roost",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost-board",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "is the published governing board",
        "detail": "Current team names individual members and affiliations. December 2025 inaugural-board announcement does not establish first existence because February launch already named a chair. Corporate reserved seats, donor vetoes, appointment/removal and budget rules remain not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Team Board; December announcement; February launch chair reference",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-launch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-board-tdc",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost-board",
      "target": "w27-roost-tdc",
      "label": "appoints the Technical Design Committee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Current Roles policy expressly assigns appointment to the Board. It is an undated current rule, distinct from November 2025 initial recruitment by ROOST and future selection design.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-board-tdc",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost-board",
        "target": "w27-roost-tdc",
        "label": "appoints the Technical Design Committee",
        "detail": "Current Roles policy expressly assigns appointment to the Board. It is an undated current rule, distinct from November 2025 initial recruitment by ROOST and future selection design.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Roles TDC; November article Decision making",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-tdc-direction",
      "source": "w27-roost-tdc",
      "target": "w27-roost-maintainers",
      "label": "sets overarching technical direction and resolves technical ties",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles"
      ],
      "summary": "Current TDC roadmap/technical role includes consultation and tie-breaking for maintainer teams. It does not require a deploying platform to adopt every update or classification policy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-tdc-direction",
        "source": "w27-roost-tdc",
        "target": "w27-roost-maintainers",
        "label": "sets overarching technical direction and resolves technical ties",
        "detail": "Current TDC roadmap/technical role includes consultation and tie-breaking for maintainer teams. It does not require a deploying platform to adopt every update or classification policy.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "TDC and Maintainers sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-host-maintainers",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost",
      "target": "w27-roost-maintainers",
      "label": "initially appoints and may replace maintainers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles"
      ],
      "summary": "Repository host may replace for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct. Maintainers may appoint additional/replacement maintainers; exact current permission exercise not audited.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-host-maintainers",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost",
        "target": "w27-roost-maintainers",
        "label": "initially appoints and may replace maintainers",
        "detail": "Repository host may replace for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct. Maintainers may appoint additional/replacement maintainers; exact current permission exercise not audited.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "ROOST and Maintainers sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-maintainer-projects",
      "source": "w27-roost-maintainers",
      "target": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "label": "exercise project and merge authority under repository rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "inferred",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme"
      ],
      "summary": "General ROOST project roles assign releases, development and merge approval under branch protection. RMC is a hosted project; this does not identify each actual RMC approver or prove a specific policy merge decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-maintainer-projects",
        "source": "w27-roost-maintainers",
        "target": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "label": "exercise project and merge authority under repository rules",
        "detail": "General ROOST project roles assign releases, development and merge approval under branch protection. RMC is a hosted project; this does not identify each actual RMC approver or prove a specific policy merge decision.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "inferred",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Roles Maintainers; RMC README repository context",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-community-proposals",
      "source": "w27-roost-community",
      "target": "w27-roost-maintainers",
      "label": "may propose changes without membership-based permissions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles"
      ],
      "summary": "Current policy gives ordinary community membership no explicit permissions. Employer organizations are not automatically contributors; partner GitHub teams administer access, not necessarily policy votes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-community-proposals",
        "source": "w27-roost-community",
        "target": "w27-roost-maintainers",
        "label": "may propose changes without membership-based permissions",
        "detail": "Current policy gives ordinary community membership no explicit permissions. Employer organizations are not automatically contributors; partner GitHub teams administer access, not necessarily policy votes.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Partner organizations, Contributors and Community sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-fork-check",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "describes forking as a check on upstream project control",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby",
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit"
      ],
      "summary": "Open-source model permits independent forks subject to the relevant licence. Published project rules do not compel downstream operators to deploy an upstream change.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-fork-check",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "describes forking as a check on upstream project control",
        "detail": "Open-source model permits independent forks subject to the relevant licence. Published project rules do not compel downstream operators to deploy an upstream change.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Roles governance/fork discussion; CC BY sections 2–3; MIT grant",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-roadmap",
      "source": "w27-roost-tdc",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "has a published roadmap-direction role with feedback routes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
        "w27-roost-s-roadmap",
        "w27-roost-s-roadmap2025",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Current Roles sets TDC direction; public roadmap and December 2025 explanation invite community feedback. Open/private/pseudonymous feedback is not a binding vote, maintainer permission or implemented feature.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-roadmap",
        "source": "w27-roost-tdc",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "has a published roadmap-direction role with feedback routes",
        "detail": "Current Roles sets TDC direction; public roadmap and December 2025 explanation invite community feedback. Open/private/pseudonymous feedback is not a binding vote, maintainer permission or implemented feature.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "TDC role; roadmap body; 11 December article; Staying secure",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
          "w27-roost-s-roadmap",
          "w27-roost-s-roadmap2025",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-fundraising-account",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost",
      "target": "w27-roost-resource-account",
      "label": "published differing non-additive founding resource totals",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-launch",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-100days"
      ],
      "summary": "Issuer launch on 10 February 2025 says more than $27m for four years; same-day president letter says $28m initial funding; 4 June says $28.5m funding and in-kind. No common valuation/cash schedule supports subtraction or summation; dollar currency unlabelled.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-fundraising-account",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost",
        "target": "w27-roost-resource-account",
        "label": "published differing non-additive founding resource totals",
        "detail": "Issuer launch on 10 February 2025 says more than $27m for four years; same-day president letter says $28m initial funding; 4 June says $28.5m funding and in-kind. No common valuation/cash schedule supports subtraction or summation; dollar currency unlabelled.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Launch funding paragraph; letter opening; first-100-days Building an Organization for Change",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-launch",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-100days"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-discord-founding",
      "source": "discord",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "is named as a founding partner in the issuer release",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-launch"
      ],
      "summary": "Founding-partner label is distinct from Discord code donation, cash amount, grant restrictions and employer-controlled board seats. No individual contribution allocation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-discord-founding",
        "source": "discord",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "is named as a founding partner in the issuer release",
        "detail": "Founding-partner label is distinct from Discord code donation, cash amount, grant restrictions and employer-controlled board seats. No individual contribution allocation established.",
        "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Founding partner paragraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-launch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-google-founding",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "is named as a founding partner in the issuer release",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-launch"
      ],
      "summary": "The named partnership supplies no allocated cash contribution, donor veto, model requirement or corporate reserved seat.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-google-founding",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "is named as a founding partner in the issuer release",
        "detail": "The named partnership supplies no allocated cash contribution, donor veto, model requirement or corporate reserved seat.",
        "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Founding partner paragraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-launch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-tc-expertise",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost",
      "label": "was credited with child-safety expertise and capacity-building context",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude"
      ],
      "summary": "Launch letter credits Coalition personnel and quotes Pathways capacity building. ROOST says it is not a corporate membership organization. No Coalition grant, Pathways software delivery or Lantern access follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-tc-expertise",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost",
        "label": "was credited with child-safety expertise and capacity-building context",
        "detail": "Launch letter credits Coalition personnel and quotes Pathways capacity building. ROOST says it is not a corporate membership organization. No Coalition grant, Pathways software delivery or Lantern access follows.",
        "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Tech Coalition/Pathways paragraphs; non-membership statement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-roost-rmc",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost",
      "target": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "label": "hosts an open model and policy integration project",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-pin",
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
        "w27-roost-s-roadmap"
      ],
      "summary": "Pinned README and current roadmap identify reusable resources. The 20 August 2026 inspected commit is a custody pin, not first release, adopter deployment or current runtime guarantee.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-roost-rmc",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost",
        "target": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "label": "hosts an open model and policy integration project",
        "detail": "Pinned README and current roadmap identify reusable resources. The 20 August 2026 inspected commit is a custody pin, not first release, adopter deployment or current runtime guarantee.",
        "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "README all 92 lines; commit identifier; roadmap RMC scope",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-pin",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
          "w27-roost-s-roadmap"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-ccf-template",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
      "target": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "label": "contributed a TVEC policy pack to RMC",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Inspected repository commit, not first contribution date.",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation"
      ],
      "summary": "README credits partner packs; CCF attribution and annex voice identify contribution beyond filename similarity. Four files include policy, two contextual annexes and evaluation. No funding ledger or authored-by-all-CCF claim.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-ccf-template",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf",
        "target": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "label": "contributed a TVEC policy pack to RMC",
        "detail": "README credits partner packs; CCF attribution and annex voice identify contribution beyond filename similarity. Four files include policy, two contextual annexes and evaluation. No funding ledger or authored-by-all-CCF claim.",
        "date": "Inspected repository commit, not first contribution date.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "README partner contribution; complete four-file pack",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-template-hosting",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "target": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "label": "is present in the inspected repository",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-relocation",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-prior-path"
      ],
      "summary": "May 27 relocation metadata says relocation without semantic changes; earlier-path query includes May 7. These are finite history results, not full authorship or adoption reconstruction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-template-hosting",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "target": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "label": "is present in the inspected repository",
        "detail": "May 27 relocation metadata says relocation without semantic changes; earlier-path query includes May 7. These are finite history results, not full authorship or adoption reconstruction.",
        "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Pinned policy file; scoped history records",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-relocation",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-prior-path"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-licence-applies",
      "source": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "target": "w27-roost-rmc-licence",
      "label": "publishes CC BY 4.0 as its root content licence",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby"
      ],
      "summary": "Read root licence supports copying/adaptation subject to its terms. No separate platform contract or blanket licence to models, endpoint data or third-party content inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-licence-applies",
        "source": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "target": "w27-roost-rmc-licence",
        "label": "publishes CC BY 4.0 as its root content licence",
        "detail": "Read root licence supports copying/adaptation subject to its terms. No separate platform contract or blanket licence to models, endpoint data or third-party content inferred.",
        "date": "2026-08-20 – 2026-08-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "README licence; licence definitions and sections 2–6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-template-reuse",
      "source": "w27-roost-rmc-licence",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "permits sharing and adaptation with attribution conditions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby"
      ],
      "summary": "Licence requires applicable attribution/notices and identification of changes, disclaims endorsement, and provides termination/cure terms. It does not require adopters to accept CCF updates or give CCF final authority over local content.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-template-reuse",
        "source": "w27-roost-rmc-licence",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "permits sharing and adaptation with attribution conditions",
        "detail": "Licence requires applicable attribution/notices and identification of changes, disclaims endorsement, and provides termination/cure terms. It does not require adopters to accept CCF updates or give CCF final authority over local content.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sections 2, 3 and 6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-template-action",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "offers removal and escalation language for voluntary adaptation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy labels eight invalid categories, normally requires two indicators for credible-threat TVEC2 and describes law-enforcement escalation plus contextual EDSA/human review. This is proposed policy text in a reusable pack, not an operating legal duty or observed removal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-template-action",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "offers removal and escalation language for voluntary adaptation",
        "detail": "Policy labels eight invalid categories, normally requires two indicators for credible-threat TVEC2 and describes law-enforcement escalation plus contextual EDSA/human review. This is proposed policy text in a reusable pack, not an operating legal duty or observed removal.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "policy.txt all 123 lines; annexes context",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-template-context",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "supplies contextual actor guidance with explicit limitations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2"
      ],
      "summary": "Annex 2 combines actor, content and behavior, discusses politicized/incomplete lists and uses selected incident context. Its examples are not legal designation findings or evidence that a named platform adopted those labels.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-template-context",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "supplies contextual actor guidance with explicit limitations",
        "detail": "Annex 2 combines actor, content and behavior, discusses politicized/incomplete lists and uses selected incident context. Its examples are not legal designation findings or evidence that a named platform adopted those labels.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Annex 2 all 65 lines",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-template-evaluation",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "publishes a finite evaluation with mixed category results",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-17 – 2026-04-17",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation"
      ],
      "summary": "170 team-labelled items yield TP114/FN12/FP0/TN44 and reported 90.5% recall/100% precision. Recruitment 12/17 fails the stated 85% target; EDSA exact-category precision is distinct from binary valid/invalid errors; TVEC4 11/13 rounds to 85%. No general precision guarantee or observed deployed model.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-template-evaluation",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "publishes a finite evaluation with mixed category results",
        "detail": "170 team-labelled items yield TP114/FN12/FP0/TN44 and reported 90.5% recall/100% precision. Recruitment 12/17 fails the stated 85% target; EDSA exact-category precision is distinct from binary valid/invalid errors; TVEC4 11/13 rounds to 85%. No general precision guarantee or observed deployed model.",
        "date": "2026-04-17 – 2026-04-17",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Evaluation all 74 lines; metrics and category table",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-template-ambiguity",
      "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "retains an unresolved category reference and contextual tension",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
        "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation"
      ],
      "summary": "INCITE1 is referenced but undefined in inspected policy line 104; EDSA exclusion and otherwise-TVEC permission/evaluation language need reconciliation before treating this as an executable consistent specification. Not evidence of actual over-removal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-template-ambiguity",
        "source": "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "retains an unresolved category reference and contextual tension",
        "detail": "INCITE1 is referenced but undefined in inspected policy line 104; EDSA exclusion and otherwise-TVEC permission/evaluation language need reconciliation before treating this as an executable consistent specification. Not evidence of actual over-removal.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "policy.txt line 104 and EDSA context; evaluation EDSA",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-guide-discretion",
      "source": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "describes configurable model and human-review choices",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "Guide recommends detection/investigation/review/enforcement separation, comparison with existing policy and human review for uncertain cross-model results. Adopter chooses policy, model/hosting and integration; recommendation is not enforced architecture.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-guide-discretion",
        "source": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "describes configurable model and human-review choices",
        "detail": "Guide recommends detection/investigation/review/enforcement separation, comparison with existing policy and human review for uncertain cross-model results. Adopter chooses policy, model/hosting and integration; recommendation is not enforced architecture.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Guide all 105 lines",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-discord-donation",
      "source": "discord",
      "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "label": "reported donating its production-origin rules engine",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025",
        "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
        "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
      ],
      "summary": "July 2025 issuer announcement and Discord engineering account trace Osprey from Discord to open ROOST tooling. Donation is software/resource transfer as reported, not an copyright assignment or customer-data transfer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-discord-donation",
        "source": "discord",
        "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "label": "reported donating its production-origin rules engine",
        "detail": "July 2025 issuer announcement and Discord engineering account trace Osprey from Discord to open ROOST tooling. Donation is software/resource transfer as reported, not an copyright assignment or customer-data transfer.",
        "date": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "July release Osprey; Discord Origins/System Components; participant history",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025",
          "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
          "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-roost-osprey",
      "source": "w27-roost-roost",
      "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "label": "reported maintaining and developing the donated engine",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025",
        "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Community improvements and subsequent Discord reintegration are participant-reported. Exact release acceptance, intellectual-property assignment and production version were not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-roost-osprey",
        "source": "w27-roost-roost",
        "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "label": "reported maintaining and developing the donated engine",
        "detail": "Community improvements and subsequent Discord reintegration are participant-reported. Exact release acceptance, intellectual-property assignment and production version were not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "July release; What Osprey Does/Results and Impact",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025",
          "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-discord-production",
      "source": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "target": "discord",
      "label": "was reported in production with local rules and controls",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported system metrics period; articles February/March 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
        "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Discord engineering reports roughly 400m daily actions, 204 action types, 2,288 rules and 99 custom UDFs as of December 2025. Actions are not necessarily violations/removals. Local ETCD rules, sinks, access/audit and unreleased functions preclude treating the public engine as the entire deployed policy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-discord-production",
        "source": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "target": "discord",
        "label": "was reported in production with local rules and controls",
        "detail": "Discord engineering reports roughly 400m daily actions, 204 action types, 2,288 rules and 99 custom UDFs as of December 2025. Actions are not necessarily violations/removals. Local ETCD rules, sinks, access/audit and unreleased functions preclude treating the public engine as the entire deployed policy.",
        "date": "Reported system metrics period; articles February/March 2026.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "System Components through Customizing; Results and Impact",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
          "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-planned",
      "source": "w27-roost-bluesky",
      "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "label": "was named as planning adoption in July 2025",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Launch account described planned/forthcoming availability and use. Later production account does not turn this announcement into contemporaneous deployment proof.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-planned",
        "source": "w27-roost-bluesky",
        "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "label": "was named as planning adoption in July 2025",
        "detail": "Launch account described planned/forthcoming availability and use. Later production account does not turn this announcement into contemporaneous deployment proof.",
        "date": "2025-07-21 – 2025-07-21",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "July release Bluesky paragraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
            "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-production",
      "source": "w27-roost-bluesky",
      "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "label": "was later reported using Osprey with locally authored rules",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case"
      ],
      "summary": "February case study attributes over 45m events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily to Bluesky; neither is a unique-account count. Analysts own rules and custom functions. ROOST-published participant account, not independently tested telemetry or proof of CCF-template use.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-production",
        "source": "w27-roost-bluesky",
        "target": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "label": "was later reported using Osprey with locally authored rules",
        "detail": "February case study attributes over 45m events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily to Bluesky; neither is a unique-account count. Analysts own rules and custom functions. ROOST-published participant account, not independently tested telemetry or proof of CCF-template use.",
        "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Complete case-study architecture and results sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-output",
      "source": "w27-roost-osprey",
      "target": "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
      "label": "was reported to send results through Kafka to a local receiver",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case"
      ],
      "summary": "Case study describes atproto events into Osprey, custom functions, Kafka and a Bluesky-owned effects receiver calling Ozone. Engine outputs become actions through this separate operator implementation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-output",
        "source": "w27-roost-osprey",
        "target": "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
        "label": "was reported to send results through Kafka to a local receiver",
        "detail": "Case study describes atproto events into Osprey, custom functions, Kafka and a Bluesky-owned effects receiver calling Ozone. Engine outputs become actions through this separate operator implementation.",
        "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Architecture/effects receiver paragraphs",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-authority",
      "source": "w27-roost-bluesky",
      "target": "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
      "label": "owns the reported effects receiver and local enforcement choices",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case"
      ],
      "summary": "Published account locates effects at the platform. No grant authority, upstream template author or ROOST repository permission is shown issuing a specific content order through this path.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-bluesky-authority",
        "source": "w27-roost-bluesky",
        "target": "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
        "label": "owns the reported effects receiver and local enforcement choices",
        "detail": "Published account locates effects at the platform. No grant authority, upstream template author or ROOST repository permission is shown issuing a specific content order through this path.",
        "date": "2026-02-04 – 2026-02-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Bluesky-owned effects receiver and analyst workflow",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-guide-phoebe",
      "source": "w27-roost-rmc",
      "target": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "label": "links Phoebe as an investigation example",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide",
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme"
      ],
      "summary": "Guide example supplies a discovery/architecture relation. It does not establish the same deployment, model, CCF policy or enforcement chain used by Discord or Bluesky.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-guide-phoebe",
        "source": "w27-roost-rmc",
        "target": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "label": "links Phoebe as an investigation example",
        "detail": "Guide example supplies a discovery/architecture relation. It does not establish the same deployment, model, CCF policy or enforcement chain used by Discord or Bluesky.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Guide example link; Phoebe README",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-config",
      "source": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "target": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "label": "selects model, endpoint and repository configuration",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-config",
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey"
      ],
      "summary": "Pinned defaults include a model setting and alternate backends; operator supplies service/repository settings. Adapter obtains action/feature/label/UDF metadata from the configured server, without a hardwired CCF taxonomy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-config",
        "source": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "target": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "label": "selects model, endpoint and repository configuration",
        "detail": "Pinned defaults include a model setting and alternate backends; operator supplies service/repository settings. Adapter obtains action/feature/label/UDF metadata from the configured server, without a hardwired CCF taxonomy.",
        "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "config.py 26–57; osprey.py 59–73",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-config",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-tools",
      "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "target": "w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
      "label": "exposes local rule-save and separate dry-run validation tools",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey",
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-tools"
      ],
      "summary": "save_rule writes local .sml under the checked directory and may overwrite a matching file; may append Require when parent index exists. validate runs osprey-cli push-rules ../ruleset --dry-run. This is not remote production activation or validation of policy correctness.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-tools",
        "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "target": "w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
        "label": "exposes local rule-save and separate dry-run validation tools",
        "detail": "save_rule writes local .sml under the checked directory and may overwrite a matching file; may append Require when parent index exists. validate runs osprey-cli push-rules ../ruleset --dry-run. This is not remote production activation or validation of policy correctness.",
        "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "osprey.py 165–233; tool definitions all 149 lines",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-tools"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-validation",
      "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "target": "w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
      "label": "instructs validation without enforcing it in the save function",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-prompt",
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey"
      ],
      "summary": "Agent prompt asks validation of each new rule; inspected save function itself does not enforce prior validation or human approval. Agent loop/executor sandbox not fully audited and no observed bypass or unsafe deployment established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-validation",
        "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "target": "w27-roost-phoebe-rules",
        "label": "instructs validation without enforcing it in the save function",
        "detail": "Agent prompt asks validation of each new rule; inspected save function itself does not enforce prior validation or human approval. Agent loop/executor sandbox not fully audited and no observed bypass or unsafe deployment established.",
        "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "prompt.py validation instructions; osprey.py 165–233",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-prompt",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-ozone-boundary",
      "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "does not implement Ozone label application or removal in the inspected adapter",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-ozone",
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme"
      ],
      "summary": "Both methods raise NotImplementedError and client remains TODO in this 18-line file. This prototype limit says nothing about all Ozone integrations or whether Bluesky can reverse a real action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-ozone-boundary",
        "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "does not implement Ozone label application or removal in the inspected adapter",
        "detail": "Both methods raise NotImplementedError and client remains TODO in this 18-line file. This prototype limit says nothing about all Ozone integrations or whether Bluesky can reverse a real action.",
        "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "ozone.py all 18 lines; README moderation boundary",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-ozone",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-licence",
      "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "offers MIT software rights without service or data entitlement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit"
      ],
      "summary": "Pinned MIT permission allows software reuse under notice/warranty conditions. It provides no server credentials, platform authority or licence to restricted data.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-phoebe-licence",
        "source": "w27-roost-phoebe",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "offers MIT software rights without service or data entitlement",
        "detail": "Pinned MIT permission allows software reuse under notice/warranty conditions. It provides no server credentials, platform authority or licence to restricted data.",
        "date": "2026-02-07 – 2026-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "All 21 lines",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-tc-pathways",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "label": "launched and operates a capacity-building programme",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-07-18 – 2024-07-18",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-launch2024",
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-year2025"
      ],
      "summary": "18 July 2024 launch described guidance and licensing opportunities. 18 December 2025 operator account reports 67 participant companies, five resources and two fireside chats; these are not ROOST deployment or independently measured outcome counts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-tc-pathways",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "label": "launched and operates a capacity-building programme",
        "detail": "18 July 2024 launch described guidance and licensing opportunities. 18 December 2025 operator account reports 67 participant companies, five resources and two fireside chats; these are not ROOST deployment or independently measured outcome counts.",
        "date": "2024-07-18 – 2024-07-18",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Complete launch and year-review programme sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-launch2024",
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-year2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-gate",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "offers no-cost support after eligibility and registration review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-current"
      ],
      "summary": "Current programme targets company employees handling user content/communications, excludes current member staff and vendors without that role, and reviews applicants. Coalition membership is neither required nor guaranteed. No registration or acceptance event observed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-gate",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "offers no-cost support after eligibility and registration review",
        "detail": "Current programme targets company employees handling user content/communications, excludes current member staff and vendors without that role, and reviews applicants. Coalition membership is neither required nor guaranteed. No registration or acceptance event observed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Full current body/FAQ/form labels",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-current"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-conditions",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "target": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "label": "requires agreement to published non-member access conditions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-current",
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Intake links the nine clauses and confidentiality agreement; continued use accepts discretionary updates. This is a published condition, not proof a particular company accepted it.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-conditions",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "target": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
        "label": "requires agreement to published non-member access conditions",
        "detail": "Intake links the nine clauses and confidentiality agreement; continued use accepts discretionary updates. This is a published condition, not proof a particular company accepted it.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Current form labels; terms clauses 1–9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-current",
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-information",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "requires accurate registration and information cooperation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Terms address information/feedback requests and reasonable efforts to respond to information requests within three months. The duties do not grant an right to a platform user database or amount to blanket assignment of feedback IP.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-information",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "requires accurate registration and information cooperation",
        "detail": "Terms address information/feedback requests and reasonable efforts to respond to information requests within three months. The duties do not grant an right to a platform user database or amount to blanket assignment of feedback IP.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Clauses 2–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-site-ip",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "grants a limited revocable site licence and restricts copying",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Licence is personal, nonexclusive, nontransferable and internal/noncommercial within the stated site-material scope. It is not an assignment of participant inventions or universal permission to all linked third-party resources.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-site-ip",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "grants a limited revocable site licence and restricts copying",
        "detail": "Licence is personal, nonexclusive, nontransferable and internal/noncommercial within the stated site-material scope. It is not an assignment of participant inventions or universal permission to all linked third-party resources.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Clause 4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-confidentiality",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "restricts disclosure of mentoring information",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Mentoring confidentiality permits limited need-to-know employee sharing. It does not make every public programme statement confidential; no executed enforcement event acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-confidentiality",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "restricts disclosure of mentoring information",
        "detail": "Mentoring confidentiality permits limited need-to-know employee sharing. It does not make every public programme statement confidential; no executed enforcement event acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Mentoring/confidentiality clauses 5–6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-discretion",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
      "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
      "label": "leaves implementation voluntary and in the user’s discretion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Clause 7 leaves whether/how to use materials to the participant and disclaims a legal/community standard. Access conditions are real while a binding instruction to remove content is not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-pathways-discretion",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
        "target": "w27-roost-tool-operator",
        "label": "leaves implementation voluntary and in the user’s discretion",
        "detail": "Clause 7 leaves whether/how to use materials to the participant and disclaims a legal/community standard. Access conditions are real while a binding instruction to remove content is not established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Clause 7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-tc-elevate",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
      "label": "offers tailored paid advisory and implementation support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate"
      ],
      "summary": "Membership is unnecessary; pricing depends on scope/expertise/support and is specified in a tailored proposal. No fixed fee, paid amount, executed scope or consultant approval right acquired. Separate from CCF Elevate and its Canadian award.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-tc-elevate",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
        "label": "offers tailored paid advisory and implementation support",
        "detail": "Membership is unnecessary; pricing depends on scope/expertise/support and is specified in a tailored proposal. No fixed fee, paid amount, executed scope or consultant approval right acquired. Separate from CCF Elevate and its Canadian award.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "funding",
        "evidence": "Complete page/FAQ",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-elevate-complements",
      "source": "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
      "target": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "label": "is described as a deeper service that can complement free support",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate",
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-current"
      ],
      "summary": "Current page offers consulting alongside Pathways or membership. Its form links a distinct /terms/ page not acquired, so the nine Pathways clauses are not treated as this consulting contract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-elevate-complements",
        "source": "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
        "target": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "label": "is described as a deeper service that can complement free support",
        "detail": "Current page offers consulting alongside Pathways or membership. Its form links a distinct /terms/ page not acquired, so the nine Pathways clauses are not treated as this consulting contract.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Elevate FAQ and exact form hyperlink",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate",
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-current"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-stability-pathways",
      "source": "w27-roost-stability-ai",
      "target": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "label": "reports participation with conflicting enrollment dates",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026",
        "w27-roost-s-stability-earlier-email"
      ],
      "summary": "Company post published 11 February 2026 says Pathways in 2025; 21 January 2025 company email PDF 65 says July 2024. Both attributed statements retained; exact signup date unresolved. Neither proves ROOST adoption or Lantern access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-stability-pathways",
        "source": "w27-roost-stability-ai",
        "target": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "label": "reports participation with conflicting enrollment dates",
        "detail": "Company post published 11 February 2026 says Pathways in 2025; 21 January 2025 company email PDF 65 says July 2024. Both attributed statements retained; exact signup date unresolved. Neither proves ROOST adoption or Lantern access.",
        "date": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "News complete body/metadata; email PDF 64–66, especially 65",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
            "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026",
          "w27-roost-s-stability-earlier-email"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-stability-membership",
      "source": "w27-roost-stability-ai",
      "target": "w22-sig-tc",
      "label": "reported subsequent Coalition membership",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026"
      ],
      "summary": "February 2026 company announcement names later membership and guidance/peer learning. Membership is not automatic Lantern access, a proved technology sublicense or any ROOST configuration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-stability-membership",
        "source": "w27-roost-stability-ai",
        "target": "w22-sig-tc",
        "label": "reported subsequent Coalition membership",
        "detail": "February 2026 company announcement names later membership and guidance/peer learning. Membership is not automatic Lantern access, a proved technology sublicense or any ROOST configuration.",
        "date": "2026-02-11 – 2026-02-11",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "campaign",
        "evidence": "Complete substantive announcement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-clint-board",
      "source": "w27-roost-clint-smith",
      "target": "w27-roost-roost-board",
      "label": "is listed as a current co-chair",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
        "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Current team page lists Smith as co-chair; December 2025 announcement used Chair. This is a named individual office, not proof Discord appoints or controls that seat.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-clint-board",
        "source": "w27-roost-clint-smith",
        "target": "w27-roost-roost-board",
        "label": "is listed as a current co-chair",
        "detail": "Current team page lists Smith as co-chair; December 2025 announcement used Chair. This is a named individual office, not proof Discord appoints or controls that seat.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "Current Board listing; December Chair/Vice-Chair announcement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-e-clint-discord",
      "source": "w27-roost-clint-smith",
      "target": "discord",
      "label": "is listed with a professional legal-leadership affiliation",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
        "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
      ],
      "summary": "ROOST current team and participant article identify Discord affiliation. Affiliation helps assess the production account as interested participant evidence; it does not establish a corporate reserved board vote.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-e-clint-discord",
        "source": "w27-roost-clint-smith",
        "target": "discord",
        "label": "is listed with a professional legal-leadership affiliation",
        "detail": "ROOST current team and participant article identify Discord affiliation. Affiliation helps assess the production account as interested participant evidence; it does not establish a corporate reserved board vote.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "Current Board biography role; participant article attribution",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
          "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-ms-software",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w28-access-photodna",
      "label": "describes qualified free software provision",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ms-photodna"
      ],
      "summary": "Microsoft describes signature computation and qualified free provision/donation, not open-source publication or access to every hash collection.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-ms-software",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w28-access-photodna",
        "label": "describes qualified free software provision",
        "detail": "Microsoft describes signature computation and qualified free provision/donation, not open-source publication or access to every hash collection.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Technology/Who uses it",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ms-photodna"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-ms-2012-license",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w28-access-photodna",
      "label": "reported named source-code licences in March 2012",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2012-03-19 – 2012-03-19",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ms-licensees2012"
      ],
      "summary": "Licensor account says Netherlands Forensics Institute and NZ Department of Internal Affairs had licensed source code. Not executed agreements, current licences or particular enforcement actions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-ms-2012-license",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w28-access-photodna",
        "label": "reported named source-code licences in March 2012",
        "detail": "Licensor account says Netherlands Forensics Institute and NZ Department of Internal Affairs had licensed source code. Not executed agreements, current licences or particular enforcement actions.",
        "date": "2012-03-19 – 2012-03-19",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Article lines14–18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ms-licensees2012"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-ms-cloud-authority",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
      "label": "retains eligibility, reverification and suspension powers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms",
        "w28-access-s-ms-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "Posted May2018 terms specify continuing eligibility discretion, accurate information, security and account suspension. They do not govern later TC software sublicences by inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-ms-cloud-authority",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
        "label": "retains eligibility, reverification and suspension powers",
        "detail": "Posted May2018 terms specify continuing eligibility discretion, accurate information, security and account suspension. They do not govern later TC software sublicences by inference.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Cloud terms1–7; FAQ vetting",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms",
          "w28-access-s-ms-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-cloud-use-audit",
      "source": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
      "target": "w28-access-cloud-customer",
      "label": "limits use and requires audit/reporting cooperation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "CSAM prevention/investigation and internal-use conditions; customer-authorized usage audits and identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC. No universal end-user-data grant, current pricing verification or SLA.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-cloud-use-audit",
        "source": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
        "target": "w28-access-cloud-customer",
        "label": "limits use and requires audit/reporting cooperation",
        "detail": "CSAM prevention/investigation and internal-use conditions; customer-authorized usage audits and identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC. No universal end-user-data grant, current pricing verification or SLA.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Cloud terms1–7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-cloud-report-ncmec",
      "source": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "label": "authorizes customer-identified aggregate reporting",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Cloud terms authorize aggregate match-count reporting to NCMEC; this does not replace customer legal reporting or prove any actual report.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-cloud-report-ncmec",
        "source": "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "label": "authorizes customer-identified aggregate reporting",
        "detail": "Cloud terms authorize aggregate match-count reporting to NCMEC; this does not replace customer legal reporting or prove any actual report.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Reporting clause",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-ms-tc-delegation",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "label": "is reported to have delegated PhotoDNA sublicensing",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023–24",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-tc-annual2023",
        "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Coalition2023 report attributes licensing provision to Microsoft;2024 report dates sublicensor role to2023 and qualifying non-member expansion to2024. Master contract and reserved approvals not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-ms-tc-delegation",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
        "label": "is reported to have delegated PhotoDNA sublicensing",
        "detail": "Coalition2023 report attributes licensing provision to Microsoft;2024 report dates sublicensor role to2023 and qualifying non-member expansion to2024. Master contract and reserved approvals not obtained.",
        "date": "2023–24",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "2023PDF10;2024PDF28",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-tc-annual2023",
          "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-tc-administers",
      "source": "w22-sig-tc",
      "target": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "label": "publishes an expanded member and non-member licensing route",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
      ],
      "summary": "January2025 announcement offers no-charge code/licensing inquiries and typical one-week response. Administrative estimate is not an award guarantee or executed applicant contract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-tc-administers",
        "source": "w22-sig-tc",
        "target": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
        "label": "publishes an expanded member and non-member licensing route",
        "detail": "January2025 announcement offers no-charge code/licensing inquiries and typical one-week response. Administrative estimate is not an award guarantee or executed applicant contract.",
        "date": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Implementation/licensing section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-tc-expanded-scope",
      "source": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "target": "w28-access-photodna",
      "label": "reports expanded permitted subject matter",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Announcement adds terrorist content and adult NCII alongside CSAM. This is the reported TC agreement expansion, not first-ever PhotoDNA use for adult NCII.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-tc-expanded-scope",
        "source": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
        "target": "w28-access-photodna",
        "label": "reports expanded permitted subject matter",
        "detail": "Announcement adds terrorist content and adult NCII alongside CSAM. This is the reported TC agreement expansion, not first-ever PhotoDNA use for adult NCII.",
        "date": "2025-01-27 – 2025-01-27",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "27January2025 expansion announcement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-tc-integration",
      "source": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "target": "w28-access-licensed-implementer",
      "label": "offers integration support to licensed companies",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024",
        "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
      ],
      "summary": "2024 report describes HMA integration for already licensed firms;2025 offers assistance. Open-source HMA does not make PhotoDNA open source or grant reference feeds.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-tc-integration",
        "source": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
        "target": "w28-access-licensed-implementer",
        "label": "offers integration support to licensed companies",
        "detail": "2024 report describes HMA integration for already licensed firms;2025 offers assistance. Open-source HMA does not make PhotoDNA open source or grant reference feeds.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "2024PDF13;2025 implementation section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024",
          "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-pathways-opportunity",
      "source": "w27-roost-pathways",
      "target": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
      "label": "offers an application opportunity separate from participation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w27-roost-s-pathways-current"
      ],
      "summary": "Accepted Pathways page permits applying for a PhotoDNA sublicense. Programme admission does not guarantee licence, membership or reference-data access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-pathways-opportunity",
        "source": "w27-roost-pathways",
        "target": "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
        "label": "offers an application opportunity separate from participation",
        "detail": "Accepted Pathways page permits applying for a PhotoDNA sublicense. Programme admission does not guarantee licence, membership or reference-data access.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Pathways current opportunity/FAQ; accepted r27 scope",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-current"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-ncmec-access",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "label": "issues environment-specific credentials and permissions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-api"
      ],
      "summary": "Published API separates read-only/read-write permissions and industry/nonprofit/law-enforcement environments; no software licence alone supplies these credentials.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-ncmec-access",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
        "label": "issues environment-specific credentials and permissions",
        "detail": "Published API separates read-only/read-write permissions and industry/nonprofit/law-enforcement environments; no software licence alone supplies these credentials.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "API section2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-submitter-visibility",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "label": "can restrict visibility of its own entries",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-api"
      ],
      "summary": "No explicit grants means all members; deleting last grant restores that default. Self-only visibility is separately described. Functions are not observed decisions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-submitter-visibility",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
        "label": "can restrict visibility of its own entries",
        "detail": "No explicit grants means all members; deleting last grant restores that default. Self-only visibility is separately described. Functions are not observed decisions.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "API4.6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-submitter-retraction",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "label": "alone can retract its entries through the described API",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-api"
      ],
      "summary": "Queries can return deletion markers with submitter/entry/time. Other members can send positive/negative feedback, not adjudicate a universal appeal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-submitter-retraction",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec-submitter",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
        "label": "alone can retract its entries through the described API",
        "detail": "Queries can return deletion markers with submitter/entry/time. Other members can send positive/negative feedback, not adjudicate a universal appeal.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "API7.5,7.9,7.10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-client-polling",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-client",
      "label": "supplies latest-state updates for locally maintained datasets",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-usage"
      ],
      "summary": "Clients choose polling and subsets. Guide says no explicit mechanism detects others’ visibility changes; new access may need historical backfill. Visibility loss is not necessarily error correction, and no cache deletion/restoration was observed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-client-polling",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-client",
        "label": "supplies latest-state updates for locally maintained datasets",
        "detail": "Clients choose polling and subsets. Guide says no explicit mechanism detects others’ visibility changes; new access may need historical backfill. Visibility loss is not necessarily error correction, and no cache deletion/restoration was observed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Complete usage guide",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-usage"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-provider-decisions",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-client",
      "label": "is described as informing company-policy action",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-provider"
      ],
      "summary": "NCMEC notice categories distinguish CSAM, some exploitative imagery below that threshold and predatory text. Provider removal/blocking follows company terms; not all categories are criminal findings or every environment’s contents.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-provider-decisions",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-client",
        "label": "is described as informing company-policy action",
        "detail": "NCMEC notice categories distinguish CSAM, some exploitative imagery below that threshold and predatory text. Provider removal/blocking follows company terms; not all categories are criminal findings or every environment’s contents.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "HashSharing/RemovingContent",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-provider"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-concentrix-audit",
      "source": "w28-access-concentrix",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
      "label": "attested a finite two-review audit",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "16 October–8 December 2023",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "538922 unique files reviewed16Oct–8Dec2023.59 exceptions:50 judged outside stated definition,5 cartoons/anime also outside,2 unplayable videos,2 uncertain ages.99.99% concerns that list/version only.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-concentrix-audit",
        "source": "w28-access-concentrix",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
        "label": "attested a finite two-review audit",
        "detail": "538922 unique files reviewed16Oct–8Dec2023.59 exceptions:50 judged outside stated definition,5 cartoons/anime also outside,2 unplayable videos,2 uncertain ages.99.99% concerns that list/version only.",
        "date": "16 October–8 December 2023",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-ncmec-correction",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
      "label": "was reported to have removed the 59 notified exceptions",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Concentrix says it notified NCMEC and was told all59 were removed in less than five business days. No independent deletion log or recipient-wide correction/restoration proof.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-ncmec-correction",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec-audit2023",
        "label": "was reported to have removed the 59 notified exceptions",
        "detail": "Concentrix says it notified NCMEC and was told all59 were removed in less than five business days. No independent deletion log or recipient-wide correction/restoration proof.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-audit-in-kind",
      "source": "w28-access-concentrix",
      "target": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "label": "was credited with a donated audit valued at $300000",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-15 – 2024-04-15",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-ncmec-donation"
      ],
      "summary": "NCMEC reports donated audit services valued at$300000; in-kind recipient valuation, not cash payment. Dollar currency not separately annotated in packet. Financial details: value: 300,000; currency: unknown; kind: reported in-kind valuation; period: Audit described April2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-audit-in-kind",
        "source": "w28-access-concentrix",
        "target": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "label": "was credited with a donated audit valued at $300000",
        "detail": "NCMEC reports donated audit services valued at$300000; in-kind recipient valuation, not cash payment. Dollar currency not separately annotated in packet.",
        "date": "2024-04-15 – 2024-04-15",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "15April2024 announcement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-donation"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 300,000; currency: unknown; kind: reported in-kind valuation; period: Audit described April2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-swgfl-stop",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "operates StopNCII",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
        "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Filed trustee account and controller notice identify the service within SWGfL. No separate programme company or Meta equity ownership established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-swgfl-stop",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "operates StopNCII",
        "detail": "Filed trustee account and controller notice identify the service within SWGfL. No separate programme company or Meta equity ownership established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "AccountsPDF6;privacycontroller",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
          "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-swgfl-rph",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-rph",
      "label": "describes the Helpline as its support service",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-about"
      ],
      "summary": "AccountsPDF5 and current institutional page describe the service; CEO account dates creation2015. Not a separately established corporation or identical programme budget.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-swgfl-rph",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-rph",
        "label": "describes the Helpline as its support service",
        "detail": "AccountsPDF5 and current institutional page describe the service; CEO account dates creation2015. Not a separately established corporation or identical programme budget.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "AccountsPDF5;Aboutservices",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-trustee-members",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "hold sole corporate membership and management rights",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Articles8/10/13–14 make trustees the only members, with one vote each and trustee appointment by resolution. Corporate membership differs from paying platform participation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-trustee-members",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "hold sole corporate membership and management rights",
        "detail": "Articles8/10/13–14 make trustees the only members, with one vote each and trustee appointment by resolution. Corporate membership differs from paying platform participation.",
        "date": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF12–16;articles8/10/13–14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-trustee-delegation",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "may impose budget limits and revoke recorded delegations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Articles19–26 give meeting/alternate agreement rules, qualified conflicts, CEO appointment and recorded/revocable committees. Terms may require Board approval or agreed budget; no actual StopNCII delegation/minute acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-trustee-delegation",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "may impose budget limits and revoke recorded delegations",
        "detail": "Articles19–26 give meeting/alternate agreement rules, qualified conflicts, CEO appointment and recorded/revocable committees. Terms may require Board approval or agreed budget; no actual StopNCII delegation/minute acquired.",
        "date": "2024-10-10 – 2024-10-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF18–20;articles19–26",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nain-trustee",
      "source": "w28-access-karuna-nain",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
      "label": "has a filed director appointment and current trustee role",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-03 – 2024-04-03",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-ch-history",
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Appointment3April2024 filed26April; current About lists trustee. Underlying appointment resolution and donor nomination not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nain-trustee",
        "source": "w28-access-karuna-nain",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
        "label": "has a filed director appointment and current trustee role",
        "detail": "Appointment3April2024 filed26April; current About lists trustee. Underlying appointment resolution and donor nomination not obtained.",
        "date": "2024-04-03 – 2024-04-03",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "CHhistory;AboutNain",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-ch-history",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nain-meta",
      "source": "w28-access-karuna-nain",
      "target": "meta",
      "label": "is described as a former safety-policy employee",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Operator biography describes former Meta role and work with SWGfL on StopNCII launch. Employment affiliation is not an employer-reserved trustee seat or funder veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nain-meta",
        "source": "w28-access-karuna-nain",
        "target": "meta",
        "label": "is described as a former safety-policy employee",
        "detail": "Operator biography describes former Meta role and work with SWGfL on StopNCII launch. Employment affiliation is not an employer-reserved trustee seat or funder veto.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "AboutNainbiography",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-pershing-income",
      "source": "w28-access-pershing-fund",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "is recorded as restricted incoming and expended resources",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Pershing Grant FY2025£75802 and FY2024comparative£78847 each matched by expense with zero opening/closing restricted balance. Legal donor unresolved; accounting recognition, not bank cash or full StopNCII budget.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-pershing-income",
        "source": "w28-access-pershing-fund",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "is recorded as restricted incoming and expended resources",
        "detail": "Pershing Grant FY2025£75802 and FY2024comparative£78847 each matched by expense with zero opening/closing restricted balance. Legal donor unresolved; accounting recognition, not bank cash or full StopNCII budget.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF34–36;Note19;recognitionPDF22",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-pershing-purpose",
      "source": "w28-access-pershing-fund",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "has an accounts purpose expressly supporting StopNCII",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Note19purpose names StopNCII support. No executed grant, donor rights, programme cost centre or full funding allocation acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-pershing-purpose",
        "source": "w28-access-pershing-fund",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "has an accounts purpose expressly supporting StopNCII",
        "detail": "Note19purpose names StopNCII support. No executed grant, donor rights, programme cost centre or full funding allocation acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF36;Note19purpose",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-meta-swgfl",
      "source": "meta",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "is labelled as comparative restricted support in the accounts",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "META/Facebook fund:FY2024£20000 incoming and expended, purpose combating NCII sharing/supporting victims. Exact paying Meta entity and StopNCII-only allocation unestablished; no FY2025row does not establish all support ended. Financial details: value: 20,000; currency: GBP; kind: comparative restricted income; equal expense; period: Year ended31March2024",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-meta-swgfl",
        "source": "meta",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "is labelled as comparative restricted support in the accounts",
        "detail": "META/Facebook fund:FY2024£20000 incoming and expended, purpose combating NCII sharing/supporting victims. Exact paying Meta entity and StopNCII-only allocation unestablished; no FY2025row does not establish all support ended.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF35–36;Note19",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 20,000; currency: GBP; kind: comparative restricted income; equal expense; period: Year ended31March2024"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-homeoffice-swgfl",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "is recorded as restricted support for violence-against-women work",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "HomeOfficeGrant–RP:FY2025£225000 and FY2024comparative£150000 incoming/expended. Stated VAWG purpose does not prove StopNCII funding or a classification instruction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-homeoffice-swgfl",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "is recorded as restricted support for violence-against-women work",
        "detail": "HomeOfficeGrant–RP:FY2025£225000 and FY2024comparative£150000 incoming/expended. Stated VAWG purpose does not prove StopNCII funding or a classification instruction.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF34–36;Note19",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-user-entry",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-user",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "may create a case under the public-user eligibility rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "Depicted person must hold intimate material and meet the adult rule; FAQ says over18 in the image. Synthetic depictions included; no on-behalf submission here. Not universal input rules or verified identity evidence.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-user-entry",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-user",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "may create a case under the public-user eligibility rules",
        "detail": "Depicted person must hold intimate material and meet the adult rule; FAQ says over18 in the image. Synthetic depictions included; no on-behalf submission here. Not universal input rules or verified identity evidence.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FAQeligibility/syntheticquestions",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-user-hash",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-user",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "is described as submitting an on-device hash",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-how"
      ],
      "summary": "Six-step account says original remains on device while hash is shared. Published workflow, not executed privacy/technical guarantee.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-user-hash",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-user",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "label": "is described as submitting an on-device hash",
        "detail": "Six-step account says original remains on device while hash is shared. Published workflow, not executed privacy/technical guarantee.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Allsixsteps",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-how"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-user-recipient-scope",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "is shared with current and future participating platforms",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January2026",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "January2026notice says users cannot choose recipients. This does not assign participants a right to all other applicant information.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-user-recipient-scope",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "is shared with current and future participating platforms",
        "detail": "January2026notice says users cannot choose recipients. This does not assign participants a right to all other applicant information.",
        "date": "January2026",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Whoweshareyourdatawith",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-user-withdrawal",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-user",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "can request whole-case withdrawal using credentials",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-faq",
        "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ requires case number/password; no recovery if lost. Full notice promises SWGfL erasure and partner erasure instructions. No actual request, delivered instruction or recipient compliance established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-user-withdrawal",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-user",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "label": "can request whole-case withdrawal using credentials",
        "detail": "FAQ requires case number/password; no recovery if lost. Full notice promises SWGfL erasure and partner erasure instructions. No actual request, delivered instruction or recipient compliance established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FAQwithdrawal/credentialloss;privacyretention",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-faq",
          "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-partner-own-policy",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "retains its own policy assessment and continuing-removal basis",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-how",
        "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Six-step guide conditions removal on platform intimate-image-abuse policy. Privacy preserves continued removal of policy-violating content after withdrawal, not a proved right to retain withdrawn reference unchanged or promise of restoration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-partner-own-policy",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "retains its own policy assessment and continuing-removal basis",
        "detail": "Six-step guide conditions removal on platform intimate-image-abuse policy. Privacy preserves continued removal of policy-violating content after withdrawal, not a proved right to retain withdrawn reference unchanged or promise of restoration.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Howitworks;privacyretention",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-how",
          "w28-access-s-stop-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-swgfl-issued-api",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "documents provider credentials and several input categories",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-api"
      ],
      "summary": "API describes CSP submissions, NGO-reviewedActive and public-userReceived entries, associated cases and independent feedback. Public-user eligibility is not the only institutional input; described types are not proof every function is deployed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-swgfl-issued-api",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "label": "documents provider credentials and several input categories",
        "detail": "API describes CSP submissions, NGO-reviewedActive and public-userReceived entries, associated cases and independent feedback. Public-user eligibility is not the only institutional input; described types are not proof every function is deployed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "APIprinted6–10,14–15",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-partner-api-contribution",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "can contribute and withdraw its own submissions in the documented interface",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-api"
      ],
      "summary": "API documents provider feedback replacement/removal, timestamps and own-submission withdrawal. Batch management expressly unimplemented; text/URLexamples are not observed censorship records.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-partner-api-contribution",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "label": "can contribute and withdraw its own submissions in the documented interface",
        "detail": "API documents provider feedback replacement/removal, timestamps and own-submission withdrawal. Batch management expressly unimplemented; text/URLexamples are not observed censorship records.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "APIprinted6–10,14–15",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-list-status-polling",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "documents status changes and limited deletion-marker availability",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-api"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipients are asked to record status changes; delayed pagination can miss deleted records. Printed6and15wording must not become one tested universal deletion clock. No downstream restored-item trace acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-list-status-polling",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "documents status changes and limited deletion-marker availability",
        "detail": "Recipients are asked to record status changes; delayed pagination can miss deleted records. Printed6and15wording must not become one tested universal deletion clock. No downstream restored-item trace acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "APIprinted6and15;pagination",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-api"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-stop-two-routes",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-approved",
      "label": "publishes an approved-participant route",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
        "w28-access-s-approved-onboarding"
      ],
      "summary": "Depicted path:registration,verification,DSA,payment,integration,approved status. No executed agreement or observed gate.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-stop-two-routes",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-approved",
        "label": "publishes an approved-participant route",
        "detail": "Depicted path:registration,verification,DSA,payment,integration,approved status. No executed agreement or observed gate.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Approvedonboardingdiagram",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
          "w28-access-s-approved-onboarding"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-stop-programme-route",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-programme",
      "label": "publishes a fuller programme-partner route",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-programme",
        "w28-access-s-programme-onboarding"
      ],
      "summary": "Diagram adds meeting team and announcement. Advertised working groups/policy-development engagement confers no specified vote or veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-stop-programme-route",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-programme",
        "label": "publishes a fuller programme-partner route",
        "detail": "Diagram adds meeting team and announcement. Advertised working groups/policy-development engagement confers no specified vote or veto.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Programmebody/onboardingdiagram",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-programme",
          "w28-access-s-programme-onboarding"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-approved-fees",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-approved",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "publishes revenue-tier annual GBP access fees",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-approved-fees",
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "New business£1000;below£10m£4000;£10–249m£8000;£250–499m£12000;£500–999m£16000;over£1bn£20000. Exact endpoint/intervening-band treatment unclarified. Schedule is not receipts or universal historical partner payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-approved-fees",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-approved",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "publishes revenue-tier annual GBP access fees",
        "detail": "New business£1000;below£10m£4000;£10–249m£8000;£250–499m£12000;£500–999m£16000;over£1bn£20000. Exact endpoint/intervening-band treatment unclarified. Schedule is not receipts or universal historical partner payment.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Approvedfeeimage;postedfees",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-approved-fees",
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-programme-fees",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-programme",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "publishes a different annual fee scale",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-programme-fees",
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Same displayed bands:£1000/10000/20000/30000/40000/50000. Published prices, not invoices, donations received or purchased policy votes; generic posted terms instead carry lower scale.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-programme-fees",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-programme",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "publishes a different annual fee scale",
        "detail": "Same displayed bands:£1000/10000/20000/30000/40000/50000. Published prices, not invoices, donations received or purchased policy votes; generic posted terms instead carry lower scale.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Programmefeeimage;postedfees",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-programme-fees",
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-participation-conflict",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-approved",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-programme",
      "label": "has conflicting public benefit comparisons",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-join",
        "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
        "w28-access-s-stop-programme"
      ],
      "summary": "Join table assigns both routes network/call/policy-development benefits, while Approved Participant prose denies wider involvement. No adjudicated tier entitlement or actual decision-right allocation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-participation-conflict",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-approved",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-programme",
        "label": "has conflicting public benefit comparisons",
        "detail": "Join table assigns both routes network/call/policy-development benefits, while Approved Participant prose denies wider involvement. No adjudicated tier entitlement or actual decision-right allocation established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Joincomparisontable;Approvedintro",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-join",
          "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
          "w28-access-s-stop-programme"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-terms-published",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "label": "posts an access instrument with unresolved drafting and identity conflicts",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms",
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles"
      ],
      "summary": "Introduction company5589479/charities1120354,SC051351 contrasts definition03948864/1099649. Empty hash definition, undefined-purpose terminology and bracketed periods remain. No legal entity is merged based on those erroneous/conflicting fields.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-terms-published",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
        "label": "posts an access instrument with unresolved drafting and identity conflicts",
        "detail": "Introduction company5589479/charities1120354,SC051351 contrasts definition03948864/1099649. Empty hash definition, undefined-purpose terminology and bracketed periods remain. No legal entity is merged based on those erroneous/conflicting fields.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "TermsIntroduction/Definitions;registeredarticles",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-terms-eligibility",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "reserves vetting, reverification and access-suspension powers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Posted criteria cover need, security, implementation, compliance and reputational/ethical/legal risk; sole-discretion/no-reasons refusal and continued eligibility review. Not an actual refusal, signed contract or unlimited lawful discretion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-terms-eligibility",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "reserves vetting, reverification and access-suspension powers",
        "detail": "Posted criteria cover need, security, implementation, compliance and reputational/ethical/legal risk; sole-discretion/no-reasons refusal and continued eligibility review. Not an actual refusal, signed contract or unlimited lawful discretion.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Eligibility/Vetting;Access/APIkeys",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-terms-use",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "restricts credentials, redistribution and model training",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Personal organizational credentials/no third-party sharing; redistribution/resale prohibited. Training exception is strictly for implementing agreed purpose on partner platform. Purpose comes from not obtained DSA; neither total training ban nor general training/data licence.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-terms-use",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "restricts credentials, redistribution and model training",
        "detail": "Personal organizational credentials/no third-party sharing; redistribution/resale prohibited. Training exception is strictly for implementing agreed purpose on partner platform. Purpose comes from not obtained DSA; neither total training ban nor general training/data licence.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PermittedUse;Access/APIkeys",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-terms-security",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "specifies scoped incident and implementation reporting",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Credential compromise notice24hours; schedule general incidents48hours; annual summaries within60days of anniversary. Security assessments/caching/incremental retrieval described. [30]implementation and [5]termination certification periods remain unfinished, not settled clocks.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-terms-security",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "specifies scoped incident and implementation reporting",
        "detail": "Credential compromise notice24hours; schedule general incidents48hours; annual summaries within60days of anniversary. Security assessments/caching/incremental retrieval described. [30]implementation and [5]termination certification periods remain unfinished, not settled clocks.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Access/APIkeys;Security;Schedule1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-terms-termination",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
      "label": "requires cessation and deletion on partner termination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
      ],
      "summary": "Termination grounds depend on not obtained DSA; cessation/destruction/certification specified with unfinished [5]business-day number. Separate from public-user hash withdrawal or restoration of content.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-terms-termination",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-partner",
        "label": "requires cessation and deletion on partner termination",
        "detail": "Termination grounds depend on not obtained DSA; cessation/destruction/certification specified with unfinished [5]business-day number. Separate from public-user hash withdrawal or restoration of content.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Term/Termination;General",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-screen-admin",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
      "label": "publishes human screening review and narrow challenge commitments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Adverse screening results receive human context review; not solely automated refusal. Where screening informs an adverse decision, uninvolved review, correction/annotation and vendor correction are offered; acknowledgment2workingdays,response30workingdays. Not universal admission appeal or observed performance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-screen-admin",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
        "label": "publishes human screening review and narrow challenge commitments",
        "detail": "Adverse screening results receive human context review; not solely automated refusal. Where screening informs an adverse decision, uninvolved review, correction/annotation and vendor correction are offered; acknowledgment2workingdays,response30workingdays. Not universal admission appeal or observed performance.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "WorkingwithPartners;AI-assistedchallenge",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-screen-deloitte",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
      "target": "w28-access-deloitte",
      "label": "names a business-verification and process provider",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "SWGfL notice describes Deloitte LLP as separate controller for applicant-business checks. This is not depicted-user identity verification or an vendor contract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-screen-deloitte",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
        "target": "w28-access-deloitte",
        "label": "names a business-verification and process provider",
        "detail": "SWGfL notice describes Deloitte LLP as separate controller for applicant-business checks. This is not depicted-user identity verification or an vendor contract.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "WorkingwithPartnersproviders",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-screen-neterium",
      "source": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
      "target": "w28-access-neterium",
      "label": "names sanctions and adverse-media screening",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Separate-controller description; concerns applicant representatives/officials. Vendor in-memory processing representation differs from SWGfL relationship-plus3years or unsuccessful3years records.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-screen-neterium",
        "source": "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
        "target": "w28-access-neterium",
        "label": "names sanctions and adverse-media screening",
        "detail": "Separate-controller description; concerns applicant representatives/officials. Vendor in-memory processing representation differs from SWGfL relationship-plus3years or unsuccessful3years records.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "WorkingwithPartnersproviders/retention",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-stop-photodna2024",
      "source": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "target": "w28-access-photodna",
      "label": "announced on-device integration in March 2024",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-03-13 – 2024-03-13",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-stop-photodna2024",
        "w28-access-s-bing2024"
      ],
      "summary": "SWGfL13March2024announcement describes integration with Microsoft support. This predates TCJanuary2025expanded-sublicence announcement; no executed assignment or licence terms acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-stop-photodna2024",
        "source": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "target": "w28-access-photodna",
        "label": "announced on-device integration in March 2024",
        "detail": "SWGfL13March2024announcement describes integration with Microsoft support. This predates TCJanuary2025expanded-sublicence announcement; no executed assignment or licence terms acquired.",
        "date": "2024-03-13 – 2024-03-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "13Marchannouncement;MicrosoftSeptemberaccount",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-photodna2024",
          "w28-access-s-bing2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-bing-donation",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "reported donating the March2024 capability",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-bing2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Microsoft credits its technology donation enabling on-device PhotoDNA. In-kind capability account, no monetary value, ownership of StopNCII or grant-control right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-bing-donation",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "reported donating the March2024 capability",
        "detail": "Microsoft credits its technology donation enabling on-device PhotoDNA. In-kind capability account, no monetary value, ownership of StopNCII or grant-control right established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "5September2024article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-bing2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-bing-pilot",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "reported a Bing pilot and 268899 image-result actions",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "By end August2024",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-bing2024"
      ],
      "summary": "By endAugust2024, operator reports action on268899images in search. Not unique victims, source-website removals, independent audit or current2026operation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-bing-pilot",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "label": "reported a Bing pilot and 268899 image-result actions",
        "detail": "By endAugust2024, operator reports action on268899images in search. Not unique victims, source-website removals, independent audit or current2026operation.",
        "date": "By end August2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "5September2024article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
            "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-bing2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-google-rollout",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "announced an intended following-months rollout",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-17 – 2025-09-17",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-google-stop2025"
      ],
      "summary": "17September2025Googleannouncement describes planned hash use. No completion record in bounded follow-up; not proved implemented use.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-google-rollout",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "announced an intended following-months rollout",
        "detail": "17September2025Googleannouncement describes planned hash use. No completion record in bounded follow-up; not proved implemented use.",
        "date": "2025-09-17 – 2025-09-17",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Announcementbody",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
            "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-google-stop2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-snap-filtering",
      "source": "snap",
      "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
      "label": "reported daily updates and withdrawal-state exclusion on named surfaces",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "15 June–15 December2024",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-snap-esafety"
      ],
      "summary": "eSafetyTable3summarizes Snap using StopNCII onSpotlight/Discover/Stories, excludingWithdrawn/Deleted;Chatrow does not list it. Provider response for15June–15December2024, not regulator runtime testing/current2026guarantee or paired restoration trace.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-snap-filtering",
        "source": "snap",
        "target": "w28-access-stop-reference",
        "label": "reported daily updates and withdrawal-state exclusion on named surfaces",
        "detail": "eSafetyTable3summarizes Snap using StopNCII onSpotlight/Discover/Stories, excludingWithdrawn/Deleted;Chatrow does not list it. Provider response for15June–15December2024, not regulator runtime testing/current2026guarantee or paired restoration trace.",
        "date": "15 June–15 December2024",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Printed28Table3;period/limits7/11/18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-snap-esafety"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-fsc-promotes",
      "source": "w28-access-fsc",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "advocates adoption partly for payment-partner credibility",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-fsc-adoption"
      ],
      "summary": "FSC26February2026article invokes legal/reputational risk and banks/processors. Industry advocacy, not bank instruction, payment disconnection or independently confirmed named-adopter counts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-fsc-promotes",
        "source": "w28-access-fsc",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "advocates adoption partly for payment-partner credibility",
        "detail": "FSC26February2026article invokes legal/reputational risk and banks/processors. Industry advocacy, not bank instruction, payment disconnection or independently confirmed named-adopter counts.",
        "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Articlemainbody;publicationmetadata",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
            "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-fsc-adoption"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-member-governance",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet-members",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet-board",
      "label": "elect some non-executives and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Articles amended 22 September 2020 and linked at observation; dated voting rules are not verified terms for every later ballot.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020",
        "w28-access-s-nominet-voting2012"
      ],
      "summary": "Members elect up to four NEDs. The Board may appoint up to four additional NEDs, who must seek member reappointment at the following AGM and periodically thereafter under article 30; executives are separate. The current-linked dated by-law allocates 25% of poll votes equally and 75% by paid-for domains, subject to caps/connected-party rules. No current weight register, actual decisive ballot or registrar grant instruction acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-member-governance",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet-members",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet-board",
        "label": "elect some non-executives and reappoint Board-appointed non-executives",
        "detail": "Members elect up to four NEDs. The Board may appoint up to four additional NEDs, who must seek member reappointment at the following AGM and periodically thereafter under article 30; executives are separate. The current-linked dated by-law allocates 25% of poll votes equally and 75% by paid-for domains, subject to caps/connected-party rules. No current weight register, actual decisive ballot or registrar grant instruction acquired.",
        "date": "Articles amended 22 September 2020 and linked at observation; dated voting rules are not verified terms for every later ballot.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Articles 26, 29–30; voting by-law 4.1–4.3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-voting2012"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-board-management",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet-board",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "controls affairs and property and may condition delegation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current-linked adopted 2020 articles; no exercised grant decision observed.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Articles 35–42 assign Board management, meeting/conflict rules and delegation powers it may alter or revoke. Article 43 registry-policy consultation is not a general member right to approve grants. No particular UKSIC approval vote or delegated spending limit acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-board-management",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet-board",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet",
        "label": "controls affairs and property and may condition delegation",
        "detail": "Articles 35–42 assign Board management, meeting/conflict rules and delegation powers it may alter or revoke. Article 43 registry-policy consultation is not a general member right to approve grants. No particular UKSIC approval vote or delegated spending limit acquired.",
        "date": "Current-linked adopted 2020 articles; no exercised grant decision observed.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Articles 35–43",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-mixed-resources",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
      "label": "describes commitments funded from reserves or annual surplus",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Commitment reported as made in 2021; financial snapshot is year ended 31 March 2025, not FY 2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025",
        "w28-access-s-nominet-memorandum"
      ],
      "summary": "The up-to-GBP 65m commitment dates to 2021. FY 2025 Group revenue comprised registry GBP 40.147m and DNS GBP 15.750m; registry revenue is not exclusively established as .uk fees. Trading operating profit GBP 5.463m, public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m and investment assets GBP 88.6m are distinct flow/stock measures. No simple same-year surplus-to-charities pass-through is established. Financial details: value: 65,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: up-to public-benefit commitment; reserves or annual surplus; period: Commitment made in 2021; not a one-year disbursement",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-mixed-resources",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
        "label": "describes commitments funded from reserves or annual surplus",
        "detail": "The up-to-GBP 65m commitment dates to 2021. FY 2025 Group revenue comprised registry GBP 40.147m and DNS GBP 15.750m; registry revenue is not exclusively established as .uk fees. Trading operating profit GBP 5.463m, public-benefit expense GBP 10.979m and investment assets GBP 88.6m are distinct flow/stock measures. No simple same-year surplus-to-charities pass-through is established.",
        "date": "Commitment reported as made in 2021; financial snapshot is year ended 31 March 2025, not FY 2026.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "FY2025 PDF5–6,26,32; memorandum clauses 3.12 and6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-memorandum"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 65,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: up-to public-benefit commitment; reserves or annual surplus; period: Commitment made in 2021; not a one-year disbursement"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-board-budget",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet-board",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
      "label": "oversees strategic alignment and agrees programme commitments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY 2025 report snapshot; no current public-benefit budget or UKSIC minute acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "FY 2025 reporting places former Public Benefit Committee work with the main Board and accrues initiatives against Board-agreed commitments. Partner engagement covers alignment, goals, delivered-result measurement and periodic external review; stated future alignment includes the business, government stakeholders and DNS ecosystem. This establishes an institutional review route, not a specific grant vote or UKSIC publication-clearance right.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-board-budget",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet-board",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet-public-benefit",
        "label": "oversees strategic alignment and agrees programme commitments",
        "detail": "FY 2025 reporting places former Public Benefit Committee work with the main Board and accrues initiatives against Board-agreed commitments. Partner engagement covers alignment, goals, delivered-result measurement and periodic external review; stated future alignment includes the business, government stakeholders and DNS ecosystem. This establishes an institutional review route, not a specific grant vote or UKSIC publication-clearance right.",
        "date": "FY 2025 report snapshot; no current public-benefit budget or UKSIC minute acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FY2025 PDF4 reader119–132, PDF10 reader507–516, PDF13 and21",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-caf-transfer",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-caf-account",
      "label": "reported a transfer into its own account for later distribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reporting period; exact transfer day not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "FY 2025 programme expense GBP 10.585m includes GBP 1.6m transferred to Nominet’s CAF account for distribution in FY 2026/27; GBP 0.394m operating costs bring total public-benefit expense to GBP 10.979m. The grants table excludes the new CAF transfer. This is an intermediate custody/accounting step, not an extra UKSIC beneficiary payment. Financial details: value: 1,600,000; currency: GBP; kind: transfer to donor CAF account; onward distribution later; period: FY2025 transfer for FY2026/27 distribution",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-caf-transfer",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-caf-account",
        "label": "reported a transfer into its own account for later distribution",
        "detail": "FY 2025 programme expense GBP 10.585m includes GBP 1.6m transferred to Nominet’s CAF account for distribution in FY 2026/27; GBP 0.394m operating costs bring total public-benefit expense to GBP 10.979m. The grants table excludes the new CAF transfer. This is an intermediate custody/accounting step, not an extra UKSIC beneficiary payment.",
        "date": "Reporting period; exact transfer day not acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "FY2025 PDF6 / printed10–11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,600,000; currency: GBP; kind: transfer to donor CAF account; onward distribution later; period: FY2025 transfer for FY2026/27 distribution"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-annual",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "reported UKSIC amounts in annual grant tables",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Two financial reporting periods, not exact payment dates.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-summary2024",
        "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Donor tables report GBP 1,599,000 for FY 2024 and GBP 1,647,000 for FY 2025. These annual amounts are neither SWGfL-only payments nor extra awards to add to the GBP 5.1m aggregate pledge. FY 2025 excludes the GBP 1.6m CAF transfer. Recipient allocation, shared recognition basis and beneficiary bank cash are not established by the tables. Financial details: value: 1,647,000; currency: GBP; kind: donor UKSIC grants-table amount; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-annual",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic",
        "label": "reported UKSIC amounts in annual grant tables",
        "detail": "Donor tables report GBP 1,599,000 for FY 2024 and GBP 1,647,000 for FY 2025. These annual amounts are neither SWGfL-only payments nor extra awards to add to the GBP 5.1m aggregate pledge. FY 2025 excludes the GBP 1.6m CAF transfer. Recipient allocation, shared recognition basis and beneficiary bank cash are not established by the tables.",
        "date": "Two financial reporting periods, not exact payment dates.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "FY2024 summary PDF5; FY2025 accounts PDF6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-summary2024",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,647,000; currency: GBP; kind: donor UKSIC grants-table amount; period: Year ended 31 March 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-pledge",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
      "label": "announced a GBP 5.1m three-year pledge",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Announcement date; exact programme commencement not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021"
      ],
      "summary": "The announcement describes a pledge intended to replace lost EU support, despite its receives-funding headline. No executed award, installment schedule, recipient allocation or completed payment acquired. Separate Childnet Digital Leaders+, SWGfL Project Evolve and IWF Countering Harm support must not be silently included. Financial details: value: 5,100,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pledge over three years; period: Announced 29 October 2021",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-pledge",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
        "label": "announced a GBP 5.1m three-year pledge",
        "detail": "The announcement describes a pledge intended to replace lost EU support, despite its receives-funding headline. No executed award, installment schedule, recipient allocation or completed payment acquired. Separate Childnet Digital Leaders+, SWGfL Project Evolve and IWF Countering Harm support must not be silently included.",
        "date": "Announcement date; exact programme commencement not obtained.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Complete announcement reader43–84",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,100,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pledge over three years; period: Announced 29 October 2021"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-purpose",
      "source": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "was described as funding the three-charity consortium",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Three-year scope announced October 2021; precise funded-period boundaries not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021"
      ],
      "summary": "The donor names IWF, Childnet and SWGfL as UKSIC partners. The aggregate pledge does not establish equal instalments or allocation among recipients.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-uksic-purpose",
        "source": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic",
        "label": "was described as funding the three-charity consortium",
        "detail": "The donor names IWF, Childnet and SWGfL as UKSIC partners. The aggregate pledge does not establish equal instalments or allocation among recipients.",
        "date": "Three-year scope announced October 2021; precise funded-period boundaries not acquired.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Announcement main body and notes",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-programme-end",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
      "label": "reported that the grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March 2025 inferred from edition context; no exact termination day asserted.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "The 2025 retrospective explicitly describes the three-year grant ending in March and the partnership ending in its existing form. This does not establish default, breach, exercise of a termination right, automatic renewal or cessation of all support.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-programme-end",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic-pledge2021",
        "label": "reported that the grant ended in March 2025 in its existing form",
        "detail": "The 2025 retrospective explicitly describes the three-year grant ending in March and the partnership ending in its existing form. This does not establish default, breach, exercise of a termination right, automatic renewal or cessation of all support.",
        "date": "March 2025 inferred from edition context; no exact termination day asserted.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "2025 Impact Issue PDF8 / printed14–15",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-continuing-support",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "stated that support and joint work would continue",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 retrospective; exact future-support term not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025"
      ],
      "summary": "The same retrospective pairs the programme end with continued-support language. It supplies no renewed grant amount, contractual extension, post-March allocation or award schedule; later commissioned research remains a separate relationship.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-continuing-support",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic",
        "label": "stated that support and joint work would continue",
        "detail": "The same retrospective pairs the programme end with continued-support language. It supplies no renewed grant amount, contractual extension, post-March allocation or award schedule; later commissioned research remains a separate relationship.",
        "date": "2025 retrospective; exact future-support term not obtained.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "2025 Impact Issue PDF8 / printed14–15",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-sid2022-commitment",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "reported a separate earlier commitment for Safer Internet Day 2022",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported 25 January 2022; commitment described as preceding October 2021, not made on publication day.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-nominet-sid2022"
      ],
      "summary": "The January 2022 announcement reports a GBP 250,000 commitment made before the October 2021 pledge. Precise commitment day, payment and consolidated reconciliation remain not obtained; do not mechanically add this named commitment to annual UKSIC amounts. Financial details: value: 250,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported Safer Internet Day commitment, not verified payment; period: Safer Internet Day 2022; commitment predates October 2021 pledge",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-sid2022-commitment",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic",
        "label": "reported a separate earlier commitment for Safer Internet Day 2022",
        "detail": "The January 2022 announcement reports a GBP 250,000 commitment made before the October 2021 pledge. Precise commitment day, payment and consolidated reconciliation remain not obtained; do not mechanically add this named commitment to annual UKSIC amounts.",
        "date": "Reported 25 January 2022; commitment described as preceding October 2021, not made on publication day.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Complete article reader43–90",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-sid2022"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 250,000; currency: GBP; kind: reported Safer Internet Day commitment, not verified payment; period: Safer Internet Day 2022; commitment predates October 2021 pledge"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-consortium-agreement",
      "source": "w28-access-childnet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
      "label": "reported a formal partnership and a trustee pre-signature approval route",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY 2025 trustees report approved 17 December 2025; actual agreement and approval dates not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Childnet says it has a formal UKSIC agreement with SWGfL and IWF and that trustees review/approve formal partnerships and major contracts before signature. CEO/Business Manager exercise daily authority under plan/budget, with payments above GBP 3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls, not a signed agreement, observed approval minute or Nominet reserved right.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-consortium-agreement",
        "source": "w28-access-childnet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
        "label": "reported a formal partnership and a trustee pre-signature approval route",
        "detail": "Childnet says it has a formal UKSIC agreement with SWGfL and IWF and that trustees review/approve formal partnerships and major contracts before signature. CEO/Business Manager exercise daily authority under plan/budget, with payments above GBP 3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls, not a signed agreement, observed approval minute or Nominet reserved right.",
        "date": "FY 2025 trustees report approved 17 December 2025; actual agreement and approval dates not obtained.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF12 / printed10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-swgfl",
      "source": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "was disclosed as including SWGfL as a partner",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Childnet identifies SWGfL in its formal partnership for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. The agreement text and any allocation, Secretariat or acceptance rights were not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-swgfl",
        "source": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "was disclosed as including SWGfL as a partner",
        "detail": "Childnet identifies SWGfL in its formal partnership for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. The agreement text and any allocation, Secretariat or acceptance rights were not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF12 / printed10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-iwf",
      "source": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "was disclosed as including IWF as a partner",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Childnet identifies IWF in its formal partnership for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. Recipient partnership membership does not confer donor editorial control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-iwf",
        "source": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "was disclosed as including IWF as a partner",
        "detail": "Childnet identifies IWF in its formal partnership for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. Recipient partnership membership does not confer donor editorial control.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF12 / printed10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-purpose",
      "source": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "was described as covering consortium projects",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "This agreement-existence disclosure provides a concrete next instrument. Signed scope, financial allocation, delegated administration and change/acceptance terms remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-uksic-agreement-purpose",
        "source": "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic",
        "label": "was described as covering consortium projects",
        "detail": "This agreement-existence disclosure provides a concrete next instrument. Signed scope, financial allocation, delegated administration and change/acceptance terms remain not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF12 / printed10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-iwf-recruitment-role",
      "source": "iwf",
      "target": "w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
      "label": "published a grant-management and reporting job specification",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Early-2022 recruitment context; no continuing staffing arrangement established.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022"
      ],
      "summary": "The recruitment pack specifies a role handling IWF grant obligations. Metadata is dated 20 January 2022 and applications close 11 February 2022; neither proves exact publication date or that a person filled the role. Generic new-application approval by the Deputy CEO must not become a bespoke Nominet right.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-iwf-recruitment-role",
        "source": "iwf",
        "target": "w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
        "label": "published a grant-management and reporting job specification",
        "detail": "The recruitment pack specifies a role handling IWF grant obligations. Metadata is dated 20 January 2022 and applications close 11 February 2022; neither proves exact publication date or that a person filled the role. Generic new-application approval by the Deputy CEO must not become a bespoke Nominet right.",
        "date": "Early-2022 recruitment context; no continuing staffing arrangement established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF1 and5–11; decisive PDF7 / printed6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-iwf-nominet-reporting",
      "source": "w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "was assigned financial-return liaison and funder-identified evaluator communication",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recruitment specification in early 2022, not an executed or currently verified grant schedule.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022"
      ],
      "summary": "The dedicated UKSIC section specifies liaison through consortium partners, particularly the Secretariat, on financial returns/reports to Nominet; communications with subcontractors/evaluators Nominet identifies; and IWF obligation coordination. Quarterly progress reports go to IWF Senior Leadership Team. No named evaluator appointment, delivered return, donor acceptance or publication veto was acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-iwf-nominet-reporting",
        "source": "w28-access-iwf-project-officer",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet",
        "label": "was assigned financial-return liaison and funder-identified evaluator communication",
        "detail": "The dedicated UKSIC section specifies liaison through consortium partners, particularly the Secretariat, on financial returns/reports to Nominet; communications with subcontractors/evaluators Nominet identifies; and IWF obligation coordination. Quarterly progress reports go to IWF Senior Leadership Team. No named evaluator appointment, delivered return, donor acceptance or publication veto was acquired.",
        "date": "Recruitment specification in early 2022, not an executed or currently verified grant schedule.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF7 / printed6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-swgfl-recognition",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "label": "was identified as the source of a recognized UKSIC grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "SWGfL Note19 records Nominet grant income and expenditure of GBP 773,395 in FY 2025, zero opening/closing restricted balance, and expressly states UKSIC consortium-operation purpose. FY 2024 comparative income was GBP 842,780. Recognition requires entitlement, relevant performance conditions, probable receipt and measurement; these are not bank receipts or a donor acceptance certificate. Pershing/StopNCII remains a separate purpose. Financial details: value: 773,395; currency: GBP; kind: SWGfL recognized Nominet restricted-grant income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-swgfl-recognition",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "label": "was identified as the source of a recognized UKSIC grant",
        "detail": "SWGfL Note19 records Nominet grant income and expenditure of GBP 773,395 in FY 2025, zero opening/closing restricted balance, and expressly states UKSIC consortium-operation purpose. FY 2024 comparative income was GBP 842,780. Recognition requires entitlement, relevant performance conditions, probable receipt and measurement; these are not bank receipts or a donor acceptance certificate. Pershing/StopNCII remains a separate purpose.",
        "date": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "SWGfL PDF22 and34–36 / Note19",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 773,395; currency: GBP; kind: SWGfL recognized Nominet restricted-grant income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-recognition",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "was explicitly named as funder of the UKSIC Hotline grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "IWF reports GBP 568,707 UKSIC fund income, GBP 593,101 expenditure and GBP 24,394 transfer from unrestricted funds; opening/closing balances are zero. Note18c expressly says the grant comes from Nominet and states no unfulfilled conditions relating to amounts recognized that year. This positive recognition assertion is narrower than acceptance of every programme deliverable or proof of bank cash. Financial details: value: 568,707; currency: GBP; kind: IWF recognized Nominet UKSIC fund income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-recognition",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "was explicitly named as funder of the UKSIC Hotline grant",
        "detail": "IWF reports GBP 568,707 UKSIC fund income, GBP 593,101 expenditure and GBP 24,394 transfer from unrestricted funds; opening/closing balances are zero. Note18c expressly says the grant comes from Nominet and states no unfulfilled conditions relating to amounts recognized that year. This positive recognition assertion is narrower than acceptance of every programme deliverable or proof of bank cash.",
        "date": "Recipient accounting period, not exact payment dates.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "IWF PDF24 Note3 and30–32 Notes18a–c; recognition PDF21–22",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 568,707; currency: GBP; kind: IWF recognized Nominet UKSIC fund income; period: Year ended 31 March 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-uksic-fund",
      "source": "w28-access-childnet",
      "target": "w28-access-uksic",
      "label": "reported income and expenditure in its Nominet UKSIC 9 restricted fund",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Recipient accounting period; underlying income composition and cash dates not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "The row records GBP 437,106 income, GBP 546,529 expenditure and GBP 109,423 transferred into the fund, with zero opening/closing balances. Trustees describe the UKSIC role as part-funded by Nominet; the inspected passages do not establish that the row’s entire income is the Nominet grant. Grants use receivable/accrual recognition. Other restricted charitable income and the separate Enhance fund cannot be used to solve the comparison without allocation records. Financial details: value: 437,106; currency: GBP; kind: Childnet Nominet UKSIC9 fund income; complete composition unestablished; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-uksic-fund",
        "source": "w28-access-childnet",
        "target": "w28-access-uksic",
        "label": "reported income and expenditure in its Nominet UKSIC 9 restricted fund",
        "detail": "The row records GBP 437,106 income, GBP 546,529 expenditure and GBP 109,423 transferred into the fund, with zero opening/closing balances. Trustees describe the UKSIC role as part-funded by Nominet; the inspected passages do not establish that the row’s entire income is the Nominet grant. Grants use receivable/accrual recognition. Other restricted charitable income and the separate Enhance fund cannot be used to solve the comparison without allocation records.",
        "date": "Recipient accounting period; underlying income composition and cash dates not obtained.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Childnet PDF5,12,23,26,35–36 / Note18",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 437,106; currency: GBP; kind: Childnet Nominet UKSIC9 fund income; complete composition unestablished; period: Year ended 31 March 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-technical",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-iwf-nominet-technical",
      "label": "was named in separate technical-project grant accounting",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY 2025 original accounting tables; no corrected figure or cause acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "IWF Note3 reports GBP 226,352 technical-project grant income; Note18a reports GBP 226,351 for the corresponding fund. Both tables were visually checked. The GBP 1 discrepancy remains unreconciled and both figures remain outside the UKSIC comparison. The operator’s IntelliGrade capability narrative is not assigned to the UKSIC Hotline grant or treated as independently verified removals. Financial details: value: 226,352; currency: GBP; kind: technical grant income in Note3; period: Year ended 31 March 2025",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-iwf-technical",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-iwf-nominet-technical",
        "label": "was named in separate technical-project grant accounting",
        "detail": "IWF Note3 reports GBP 226,352 technical-project grant income; Note18a reports GBP 226,351 for the corresponding fund. Both tables were visually checked. The GBP 1 discrepancy remains unreconciled and both figures remain outside the UKSIC comparison. The operator’s IntelliGrade capability narrative is not assigned to the UKSIC Hotline grant or treated as independently verified removals.",
        "date": "FY 2025 original accounting tables; no corrected figure or cause acquired.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "IWF PDF24 Note3; PDF30 Note18a; PDF7 technology narrative",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 226,352; currency: GBP; kind: technical grant income in Note3; period: Year ended 31 March 2025"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-sid2025-delivery",
      "source": "w28-access-childnet",
      "target": "w28-access-sid2025",
      "label": "reported activity delivered with support from Nominet and other funders",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Safer Internet Day event date; aggregate activity-count periods are not independently reconstructed.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
      ],
      "summary": "The trustees narrative reports more than 1,700 registered supporting organizations, almost 160,000 resource downloads and over 86,000 quiz uses. It credits Nominet alongside other funders. These are recipient-reported outputs, not independently audited impact, accepted grant deliverables or exclusively Nominet-caused results; mixed-year survey percentages are not imported.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-sid2025-delivery",
        "source": "w28-access-childnet",
        "target": "w28-access-sid2025",
        "label": "reported activity delivered with support from Nominet and other funders",
        "detail": "The trustees narrative reports more than 1,700 registered supporting organizations, almost 160,000 resource downloads and over 86,000 quiz uses. It credits Nominet alongside other funders. These are recipient-reported outputs, not independently audited impact, accepted grant deliverables or exclusively Nominet-caused results; mixed-year survey percentages are not imported.",
        "date": "Safer Internet Day event date; aggregate activity-count periods are not independently reconstructed.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Childnet PDF8 / printed6; financial audit distinction PDF16–17",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-research-commission",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
      "label": "commissioned and funded research with disclosed design input",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 report; exact commission date not obtained, January URL directory is not a verified publication day.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-sid-research2026"
      ],
      "summary": "The published report identifies Nominet commissioning/funding and input to design, while Childnet leads study design. No amount, executed brief, precise cash dates, changed question, final approval right or publication veto was acquired. This later commission is not established as a renewal or drawdown of the GBP 5.1m pledge.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-nominet-research-commission",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
        "label": "commissioned and funded research with disclosed design input",
        "detail": "The published report identifies Nominet commissioning/funding and input to design, while Childnet leads study design. No amount, executed brief, precise cash dates, changed question, final approval right or publication veto was acquired. This later commission is not established as a renewal or drawdown of the GBP 5.1m pledge.",
        "date": "2026 report; exact commission date not obtained, January URL directory is not a verified publication day.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "2026 report PDF2 / printed2–3 commissioning/method block",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-sid-research2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-research-design",
      "source": "w28-access-childnet",
      "target": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
      "label": "was identified as the lead for study design",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "School focus groups reported May–June 2025 and youth consultations November–December 2025; precise days not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-sid-research2026"
      ],
      "summary": "The method block assigns design lead to Childnet with Nominet input; Childnet also ran youth-group consultations and school focus groups. This supports stated roles, not an independent validity audit or a determination of final approval rights.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-childnet-research-design",
        "source": "w28-access-childnet",
        "target": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
        "label": "was identified as the lead for study design",
        "detail": "The method block assigns design lead to Childnet with Nominet input; Childnet also ran youth-group consultations and school focus groups. This supports stated roles, not an independent validity audit or a determination of final approval rights.",
        "date": "School focus groups reported May–June 2025 and youth consultations November–December 2025; precise days not obtained.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "2026 report PDF2 / printed2–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-sid-research2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-e-opinium-research-delivery",
      "source": "w28-access-opinium",
      "target": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
      "label": "was credited with conducting the November 2025 surveys",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Survey month November 2025; exact fieldwork dates not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w28-access-s-sid-research2026"
      ],
      "summary": "The report credits Opinium surveys of 2,018 children and 2,000 parents/carers. This is an attributed delivery role in a public report, not an inspected survey dataset, contractual acceptance record or full methodological validation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-e-opinium-research-delivery",
        "source": "w28-access-opinium",
        "target": "w28-access-sid-research2026",
        "label": "was credited with conducting the November 2025 surveys",
        "detail": "The report credits Opinium surveys of 2,018 children and 2,000 parents/carers. This is an attributed delivery role in a public report, not an inspected survey dataset, contractual acceptance record or full methodological validation.",
        "date": "Survey month November 2025; exact fieldwork dates not obtained.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "2026 report PDF2 / printed2–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-sid-research2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-nominet-policy",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w29-enf-cpp2026",
      "label": "publishes and administers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Nominet administers the posted July2026 CPP. Criminal-use merits originate with listed agencies; an administrative check is not an independent criminal trial.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-nominet-policy",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w29-enf-cpp2026",
        "label": "publishes and administers",
        "detail": "Nominet administers the posted July2026 CPP. Criminal-use merits originate with listed agencies; an administrative check is not an independent criminal trial.",
        "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CPP §§2–3, PDF3–4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-agency-certification",
      "source": "w29-enf-listed-agencies",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "may certify criminal use under listed-agency route",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Official written certification is the listed-agency trigger. IWF/UKSIC are not on this particular list; their separate relationship must not be represented as LEA certification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-agency-certification",
        "source": "w29-enf-listed-agencies",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet",
        "label": "may certify criminal use under listed-agency route",
        "detail": "Official written certification is the listed-agency trigger. IWF/UKSIC are not on this particular list; their separate relationship must not be represented as LEA certification.",
        "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "CPP §§2–4 PDF3–6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-cpp-notice",
      "source": "w29-enf-cpp2026",
      "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "label": "specifies notice and corrective-action opportunity",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Ordinarily at least48hours notice before special status. Significant evidence of imminent harm permits immediate action with senior-management approval. Satisfactory prior action or agency confirmation that criminal use ended affects continuation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-cpp-notice",
        "source": "w29-enf-cpp2026",
        "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "label": "specifies notice and corrective-action opportunity",
        "detail": "Ordinarily at least48hours notice before special status. Significant evidence of imminent harm permits immediate action with senior-management approval. Satisfactory prior action or agency confirmation that criminal use ended affects continuation.",
        "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CPP §3 PDF3–4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-cpp-measure",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "label": "may suspend or redirect under published CPP",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
      ],
      "summary": "For .UK the posted July2026 policy specifies minimum24months; .cymru/.wales use expiry/cancellation/re-registration rules. Domain access can be disrupted without removing hosted content. This is a stated mechanism, not an action against a named registrant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-cpp-measure",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "label": "may suspend or redirect under published CPP",
        "detail": "For .UK the posted July2026 policy specifies minimum24months; .cymru/.wales use expiry/cancellation/re-registration rules. Domain access can be disrupted without removing hosted content. This is a stated mechanism, not an action against a named registrant.",
        "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "CPP §§3,5 PDF4,7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-cpp-merits-challenge",
      "source": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "target": "w29-enf-listed-agencies",
      "label": "is directed to agency merits-review routes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Criminal-use merits go through the referring agency complaint/appeal process and applicable external review. Nominet implementation complaints are separate; exact current complaint instrument was not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-cpp-merits-challenge",
        "source": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "target": "w29-enf-listed-agencies",
        "label": "is directed to agency merits-review routes",
        "detail": "Criminal-use merits go through the referring agency complaint/appeal process and applicable external review. Nominet implementation complaints are separate; exact current complaint instrument was not acquired.",
        "date": "2026-07-06 – 2026-07-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "CPP §3 PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cpp2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-terms-discretion",
      "source": "w29-enf-registrant-terms",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "reserves suspension and court-order grounds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-03-20 – 2024-03-20",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-terms2024"
      ],
      "summary": "Unlawful use prohibition6.1.5, discretionary high-risk ground10.1.2 and valid binding court order10.2.5 are distinct. Proscribed-name ground requires serious sexual-offence meaning and no reasonable legitimate use. Not a conclusion that any specific case satisfies them.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-terms-discretion",
        "source": "w29-enf-registrant-terms",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet",
        "label": "reserves suspension and court-order grounds",
        "detail": "Unlawful use prohibition6.1.5, discretionary high-risk ground10.1.2 and valid binding court order10.2.5 are distinct. Proscribed-name ground requires serious sexual-offence meaning and no reasonable legitimate use. Not a conclusion that any specific case satisfies them.",
        "date": "2024-03-20 – 2024-03-20",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Terms definitions;6.1.4–5;10.1–2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-terms2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-iwf-historical-membership",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "reported membership and prompt-removal cooperation in2013",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2013 context; exact day unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-iwf2013"
      ],
      "summary": "The2013 review describes membership and cooperation on CSAM/criminally obscene adult content. It predates the2021UKSIC grant; no executed IWF protocol or grant-created suspension right established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-iwf-historical-membership",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "reported membership and prompt-removal cooperation in2013",
        "detail": "The2013 review describes membership and cooperation on CSAM/criminally obscene adult content. It predates the2021UKSIC grant; no executed IWF protocol or grant-created suspension right established.",
        "date": "2013 context; exact day unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "affiliation",
        "evidence": "PDF2 §3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
            "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-iwf2013"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-iwf-reported-requests",
      "source": "iwf",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "was attributed one request in each selected later period",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-action2020",
        "w29-enf-s-action2023",
        "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions"
      ],
      "summary": "Nominet reports one IWF request in2022-11-01–2023-10-31 and one in2023-11-01–2024-10-31, compared with zero2019-11-01–2020-10-31. A request is not proved completed suspension, unique underlying content or causal grant outcome.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-iwf-reported-requests",
        "source": "iwf",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet",
        "label": "was attributed one request in each selected later period",
        "detail": "Nominet reports one IWF request in2022-11-01–2023-10-31 and one in2023-11-01–2024-10-31, compared with zero2019-11-01–2020-10-31. A request is not proved completed suspension, unique underlying content or causal grant outcome.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "2020 and2023 one-page reports; Impact2025 PDF9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-action2020",
          "w29-enf-s-action2023",
          "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-nominet-reported-actions",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w29-enf-reported-actions",
      "label": "reported suspensions, non-suspensions and reversals",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-action2020",
        "w29-enf-s-action2023",
        "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions"
      ],
      "summary": "Selected periods respectively report22158/1193/913 suspended domains,47/3/0 requests not resulting in suspension, and15/19/16 reversals. These categories differ in units and cannot be added into a success/error rate. Reversals are not attributed specifically to IWF.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-nominet-reported-actions",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w29-enf-reported-actions",
        "label": "reported suspensions, non-suspensions and reversals",
        "detail": "Selected periods respectively report22158/1193/913 suspended domains,47/3/0 requests not resulting in suspension, and15/19/16 reversals. These categories differ in units and cannot be added into a success/error rate. Reversals are not attributed specifically to IWF.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "2020/2023 report text; Impact2025 PDF9/printed16–17",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-action2020",
          "w29-enf-s-action2023",
          "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-nominet-reversal-basis",
      "source": "w29-enf-reported-actions",
      "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "label": "reports examples of restraint and lifting suspension",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-11-01–2023-10-31 reporting period",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-action2023"
      ],
      "summary": "The2023 report gives prior suspension, court-ordered transfer or subsequent compliance among non-suspension reasons; reversal follows agency-confirmed cessation. This is a positive reported correction/restraint record, not independently observed restoration or an error finding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-nominet-reversal-basis",
        "source": "w29-enf-reported-actions",
        "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "label": "reports examples of restraint and lifting suspension",
        "detail": "The2023 report gives prior suspension, court-ordered transfer or subsequent compliance among non-suspension reasons; reversal follows agency-confirmed cessation. This is a positive reported correction/restraint record, not independently observed restoration or an error finding.",
        "date": "2022-11-01–2023-10-31 reporting period",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Complete2023 report reader",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-action2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-historical-review-promise",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "label": "announced separate review promises in2014",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2014-04-03 – 2014-04-03",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-formal2014"
      ],
      "summary": "Announcement effective4May2014 promised criminal-suspension lifting for ended conduct/wrong application/referrer nonresponse within10workingdays, distinct from proscribed-name30day review. Those historical deadlines are not silently imported into July2026CPP.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-historical-review-promise",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "label": "announced separate review promises in2014",
        "detail": "Announcement effective4May2014 promised criminal-suspension lifting for ended conduct/wrong application/referrer nonresponse within10workingdays, distinct from proscribed-name30day review. Those historical deadlines are not silently imported into July2026CPP.",
        "date": "2014-04-03 – 2014-04-03",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "3April2014 announcement substantive review paragraphs",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-formal2014"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-reported-future-statutory-route",
      "source": "w28-access-nominet",
      "target": "w29-enf-statutory-account",
      "label": "described future court-backed powers and voluntary-first practice",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-statutory-account2026"
      ],
      "summary": "16July2026 blog reports Royal Assent29April and commencement still required, with indicative end-November timing. These are Nominet-attributed legal/timetable statements; no independent current Act or commencement finding is added.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-reported-future-statutory-route",
        "source": "w28-access-nominet",
        "target": "w29-enf-statutory-account",
        "label": "described future court-backed powers and voluntary-first practice",
        "detail": "16July2026 blog reports Royal Assent29April and commencement still required, with indicative end-November timing. These are Nominet-attributed legal/timetable statements; no independent current Act or commencement finding is added.",
        "date": "2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Blog full substantive body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-statutory-account2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-police-unit",
      "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "hosts the specialist unit",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
      ],
      "summary": "PIPCU is a police unit, not a separately identified corporate recipient. The2014 government account calls it operationally independent and reports IPO funding and secondments.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-police-unit",
        "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "hosts the specialist unit",
        "detail": "PIPCU is a police unit, not a separately identified corporate recipient. The2014 government account calls it operationally independent and reports IPO funding and secondments.",
        "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "2014 article and Notes to Editors",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-police-ashiko",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "label": "operates the published suspension process",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
      ],
      "summary": "The2020 police policy describes requests based on investigation and due diligence, using a reported Nominet agreement without a court order. The agreement itself was not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-police-ashiko",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "label": "operates the published suspension process",
        "detail": "The2020 police policy describes requests based on investigation and due diligence, using a reported Nominet agreement without a court order. The agreement itself was not acquired.",
        "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Ashiko policy §§2–4, PDF4–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-private-evidence",
      "source": "w29-enf-referrers",
      "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "label": "may provide intelligence and infringement evidence",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020",
        "w29-enf-s-delivery2019"
      ],
      "summary": "Brands/enforcement sources supply evidence and may confirm infringement where necessary; police retains investigative and authorisation steps. No grant of independent private suspension authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-private-evidence",
        "source": "w29-enf-referrers",
        "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "label": "may provide intelligence and infringement evidence",
        "detail": "Brands/enforcement sources supply evidence and may confirm infringement where necessary; police retains investigative and authorisation steps. No grant of independent private suspension authority.",
        "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Policy §§2,8; PIPCU report PDF59",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020",
          "w29-enf-s-delivery2019"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-dci-authorisation",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu-dci",
      "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "label": "must authorise every police domain suspension",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Section9 names the PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector as authoriser. This is narrower than control of every downstream registry decision or all other programme actions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-dci-authorisation",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu-dci",
        "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "label": "must authorise every police domain suspension",
        "detail": "Section9 names the PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector as authoriser. This is narrower than control of every downstream registry decision or all other programme actions.",
        "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Ashiko policy §9 PDF9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-registrar-first",
      "source": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "target": "w29-enf-registrar",
      "label": "requests registrar investigation and terms-based action first",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
      ],
      "summary": "The registrar investigates and acts where its terms justify action. After48hours without action police may ask Nominet to investigate and act; the policy does not describe private complainants skipping police authorisation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-registrar-first",
        "source": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "target": "w29-enf-registrar",
        "label": "requests registrar investigation and terms-based action first",
        "detail": "The registrar investigates and acts where its terms justify action. After48hours without action police may ask Nominet to investigate and act; the policy does not describe private complainants skipping police authorisation.",
        "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Ashiko policy §7 PDF7–8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-police-registry-request",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w28-access-nominet",
      "label": "may escalate after registrar non-action under2020policy",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
      ],
      "summary": "The2020 policy specifies a minimum24-month suspension or earlier expiry of the registration, not an unconditional fixed24-month term. It is a dated police instrument and is not substituted for July2026CPP wording.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-police-registry-request",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w28-access-nominet",
        "label": "may escalate after registrar non-action under2020policy",
        "detail": "The2020 policy specifies a minimum24-month suspension or earlier expiry of the registration, not an unconditional fixed24-month term. It is a dated police instrument and is not substituted for July2026CPP wording.",
        "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Ashiko policy §7, discovery2 reader scope",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ashiko-challenge",
      "source": "w29-enf-registrant",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "may request reassessment within the initial notice window",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Within the initial48hours the registrant may raise error and remediation; police responds to WHOIS registrant or documented representative, with police complaints separate. This is a stated2020 route, not an observed reversal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ashiko-challenge",
        "source": "w29-enf-registrant",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "may request reassessment within the initial notice window",
        "detail": "Within the initial48hours the registrant may raise error and remediation; police responds to WHOIS registrant or documented representative, with police complaints separate. This is a stated2020 route, not an observed reversal.",
        "date": "2020-06-22 – 2020-06-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Ashiko policy §§10–11 PDF9–10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ashiko-delivery2019",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "label": "reported32995 website suspensions in2018/19",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2018/19 report period; precise operation interval not separately established",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-delivery2019"
      ],
      "summary": "PIPCU contribution reports32995 websites suspended in2018/19. Adjacent Nominet request/domain totals cover a different period and are not a matched denominator. No independently verified individual outcome or current all-TLD total inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ashiko-delivery2019",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "label": "reported32995 website suspensions in2018/19",
        "detail": "PIPCU contribution reports32995 websites suspended in2018/19. Adjacent Nominet request/domain totals cover a different period and are not a matched denominator. No independently verified individual outcome or current all-TLD total inferred.",
        "date": "2018/19 report period; precise operation interval not separately established",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "PDF59/printed55; PDF56 reporting-period cross-check",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-delivery2019"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ashiko-resource-account2022",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
      "label": "reported one detective plus management and no referral charge",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-strategy2022"
      ],
      "summary": "February2022 strategy says one detective plus PIPCU management support and no charge to brands/referrers. This does not establish current staffing, total cost, a budget allocation or a free right to compel action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ashiko-resource-account2022",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-ashiko",
        "label": "reported one detective plus management and no referral charge",
        "detail": "February2022 strategy says one detective plus PIPCU management support and no charge to brands/referrers. This does not establish current staffing, total cost, a budget allocation or a free right to compel action.",
        "date": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "Future challenges, complete Ashiko paragraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-strategy2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-gateway-operated",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-gateway",
      "label": "announced assessment and prioritisation of incoming intelligence",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-gateway2025"
      ],
      "summary": "New route replaces the old PIPCU submission form from11August2025. IPO team may develop intelligence or refer to law enforcement; no published weighting, case acceptance guarantee or transfer of Ashiko DCI authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-gateway-operated",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-gateway",
        "label": "announced assessment and prioritisation of incoming intelligence",
        "detail": "New route replaces the old PIPCU submission form from11August2025. IPO team may develop intelligence or refer to law enforcement; no published weighting, case acceptance guarantee or transfer of Ashiko DCI authority.",
        "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Complete12August2025 article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-gateway2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-gateway-referrers",
      "source": "w29-enf-referrers",
      "target": "w29-enf-gateway",
      "label": "are directed to the replacement professional intake",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-gateway2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Announcement names rightsholders/enforcement partners and distinguishes public reporting through Trading Standards/Crimestoppers. The form and operational endpoint were not opened.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-gateway-referrers",
        "source": "w29-enf-referrers",
        "target": "w29-enf-gateway",
        "label": "are directed to the replacement professional intake",
        "detail": "Announcement names rightsholders/enforcement partners and distinguishes public reporting through Trading Standards/Crimestoppers. The form and operational endpoint were not opened.",
        "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Article substantive intake paragraphs",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-gateway2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-gateway-referral",
      "source": "w29-enf-gateway",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "may refer intelligence following assessment",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-gateway2025"
      ],
      "summary": "PIPCU is a liaison/enforcement recipient, alongside other law-enforcement partners. Intake is not a binding instruction to investigate or suspend.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-gateway-referral",
        "source": "w29-enf-gateway",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "may refer intelligence following assessment",
        "detail": "PIPCU is a liaison/enforcement recipient, alongside other law-enforcement partners. Intake is not a binding instruction to investigate or suspend.",
        "date": "2025-08-12 – 2025-08-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Article assessment and liaison paragraphs",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-gateway2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ipo-dsit-dividend",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "label": "recorded an additional dividend paid to cover PIPCU costs",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2025/26 ended31March2026",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ipo-accounts2026"
      ],
      "summary": "IPO accounts record£2.533m paid to DSIT inFY2025/26, covering PIPCU actual costs since the previous additional dividend. Comparative£2.624m belongs toFY2024/25. Neither is proof of a direct PIPCU bank receipt, Ashiko allocation or an additional independent transfer to be double-counted. Financial details: value: 2,533,000; currency: GBP; kind: accounts-recorded additional dividend paid to DSIT; period: 2025-04-01/2026-03-31",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ipo-dsit-dividend",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "label": "recorded an additional dividend paid to cover PIPCU costs",
        "detail": "IPO accounts record£2.533m paid to DSIT inFY2025/26, covering PIPCU actual costs since the previous additional dividend. Comparative£2.624m belongs toFY2024/25. Neither is proof of a direct PIPCU bank receipt, Ashiko allocation or an additional independent transfer to be double-counted.",
        "date": "FY2025/26 ended31March2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Note7 Dividends; Note1(o)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-accounts2026"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 2,533,000; currency: GBP; kind: accounts-recorded additional dividend paid to DSIT; period: 2025-04-01/2026-03-31"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-baseline-funding",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "announced baseline support through IPO forApril2026–March2029",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-funding2026",
        "w29-enf-s-funding-answer2026"
      ],
      "summary": "March2026 announcement commits approximately£3m annually, through IPO, for the three-year period. Amount is an announced approximate annual baseline, not an executed payment schedule or£9m observed cash total. Written answer19March confirms duration. Financial details: value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: approximate annual baseline commitment; period: April2026–March2029; per year, not three-year paid total",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-baseline-funding",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "announced baseline support through IPO forApril2026–March2029",
        "detail": "March2026 announcement commits approximately£3m annually, through IPO, for the three-year period. Amount is an announced approximate annual baseline, not an executed payment schedule or£9m observed cash total. Written answer19March confirms duration.",
        "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Announcement Background; written answer119446",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-funding2026",
          "w29-enf-s-funding-answer2026"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: approximate annual baseline commitment; period: April2026–March2029; per year, not three-year paid total"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-historic-funding2014",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "announced further£3m funding to2017",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
      ],
      "summary": "23October2014 announcement describes initial£2.56m for two years fromSeptember2013 and a further£3m through2017. Announced historical support is not a reconciled payment ledger or current contract. Financial details: value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: further funding announced; period: through2017",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-historic-funding2014",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "announced further£3m funding to2017",
        "detail": "23October2014 announcement describes initial£2.56m for two years fromSeptember2013 and a further£3m through2017. Announced historical support is not a reconciled payment ledger or current contract.",
        "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "2014 announcement and Notes to Editors",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 3,000,000; currency: GBP; kind: further funding announced; period: through2017"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-bpi-secondment",
      "source": "w29-enf-bpi",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "was reported to supply an internet-investigator secondee",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
      ],
      "summary": "2014 government account names BPI and an IPO senior-intelligence-officer secondment. The source does not give salary allocation, executed secondment terms, duration or private approval rights; its21-person staffing statement is not current headcount.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-bpi-secondment",
        "source": "w29-enf-bpi",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "was reported to supply an internet-investigator secondee",
        "detail": "2014 government account names BPI and an IPO senior-intelligence-officer secondment. The source does not give salary allocation, executed secondment terms, duration or private approval rights; its21-person staffing statement is not current headcount.",
        "date": "2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "Notes to Editors, staffing and secondments",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-historical-unconfirmed-forecast",
      "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "published unconfirmed IPO income forecasts in2018",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2018-05-24 – 2018-05-24",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-police-forecast2018"
      ],
      "summary": "Draft financial-plan AppendixB lists£1.613m in each year2018/19–2022/23 as unconfirmed. This is neither a received annual grant nor a signed indexation obligation. Financial details: value: 1,613,000; currency: GBP; kind: unconfirmed annual forecast, repeated across five years; period: 2018/19–2022/23; each year",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-historical-unconfirmed-forecast",
        "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "published unconfirmed IPO income forecasts in2018",
        "detail": "Draft financial-plan AppendixB lists£1.613m in each year2018/19–2022/23 as unconfirmed. This is neither a received annual grant nor a signed indexation obligation.",
        "date": "2018-05-24 – 2018-05-24",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF11 AppendixB; PDF1,12 context",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-police-forecast2018"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,613,000; currency: GBP; kind: unconfirmed annual forecast, repeated across five years; period: 2018/19–2022/23; each year"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-combined-budget-proposal",
      "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "included the unit in a combined2025 funding increase proposal",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-police-budget2025"
      ],
      "summary": "For-decision paper describes£0.5m combined increase across PIPCU,IFED andDCPCU; no PIPCU share. Paragraph31 places detailed funding streams in non-public Appendix3. This is a proposal/publication boundary, not an approval or concealment inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-combined-budget-proposal",
        "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "included the unit in a combined2025 funding increase proposal",
        "detail": "For-decision paper describes£0.5m combined increase across PIPCU,IFED andDCPCU; no PIPCU share. Paragraph31 places detailed funding streams in non-public Appendix3. This is a proposal/publication boundary, not an approval or concealment inference.",
        "date": "2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF9 §12; PDF17 §31; cover committees10/12February2025",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-police-budget2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
      "label": "is to develop priorities and contribution levels with PIPCU",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-funding2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Announcement plans an industry co-funding pilot fromApril2027 for extra capacity, combining public powers/strategic oversight with industry expertise/intelligence. No contributor commitments, selection weights, conflict rules or individual-case rights are published in the notice.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
        "label": "is to develop priorities and contribution levels with PIPCU",
        "detail": "Announcement plans an industry co-funding pilot fromApril2027 for extra capacity, combining public powers/strategic oversight with industry expertise/intelligence. No contributor commitments, selection weights, conflict rules or individual-case rights are published in the notice.",
        "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "2026 announcement, Background4–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-funding2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-police",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
      "label": "is named joint developer of the future pilot",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-funding2026"
      ],
      "summary": "PIPCU and IPO are to develop pilot priorities and contribution levels. Joint future design is not proof of collected industry money or industry voting power.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-pilot-design-police",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
        "label": "is named joint developer of the future pilot",
        "detail": "PIPCU and IPO are to develop pilot priorities and contribution levels. Joint future design is not proof of collected industry money or industry voting power.",
        "date": "2026-03-09 – 2026-03-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Background4–5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-funding2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-ipo",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-steering-group",
      "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated historical guide; no exact publication day",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "Posted undated referral guide names IPO alongside police, rightsholders and industry bodies as having agreed broad priorities. Source mentionsOctober2014 funding and uses the subsequently replaced form; no current charter inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-ipo",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-steering-group",
        "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
        "detail": "Posted undated referral guide names IPO alongside police, rightsholders and industry bodies as having agreed broad priorities. Source mentionsOctober2014 funding and uses the subsequently replaced form; no current charter inferred.",
        "date": "Undated historical guide; no exact publication day",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Referral guide PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-police",
      "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
      "target": "w29-enf-steering-group",
      "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "Police participation in broad priority agreement is reported, not a delegation of case approval to every participant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-police",
        "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
        "target": "w29-enf-steering-group",
        "label": "is named in the historical remit-setting group",
        "detail": "Police participation in broad priority agreement is reported, not a delegation of case approval to every participant.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Referral guide PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-industry",
      "source": "w29-enf-referrers",
      "target": "w29-enf-steering-group",
      "label": "are named among participants agreeing broad priorities",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "Rightsholders and industry bodies have an actual reported remit contribution. No particular company vote, quorum, funding condition or authority to compel a case established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-industry",
        "source": "w29-enf-referrers",
        "target": "w29-enf-steering-group",
        "label": "are named among participants agreeing broad priorities",
        "detail": "Rightsholders and industry bodies have an actual reported remit contribution. No particular company vote, quorum, funding condition or authority to compel a case established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Referral guide PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-remit",
      "source": "w29-enf-steering-group",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "is reported to have agreed broad unit priorities",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "Priorities cover physical goods with an online connection and digital content. Steering-role evidence is historical; it is not the same body as the FY2022/23 IP Crime Group executive board or the2025Gateway.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-steering-remit",
        "source": "w29-enf-steering-group",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "is reported to have agreed broad unit priorities",
        "detail": "Priorities cover physical goods with an online connection and digital content. Steering-role evidence is historical; it is not the same body as the FY2022/23 IP Crime Group executive board or the2025Gateway.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Referral guide PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-historical-case-acceptance",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w29-enf-referrers",
      "label": "published evidence requirements and police refusal review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "Historical guide gives six factors: remit; organised activity; public-safety danger and actual/anticipated financial loss or reputational harm; ongoing activity; asset recovery; prosecution prospects. Referrals require evidence/groundwork and separated inferences. Detective Inspector gives refusal reasons/alternatives;10workingdays is an aim with updates, not a current Gateway rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-historical-case-acceptance",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w29-enf-referrers",
        "label": "published evidence requirements and police refusal review",
        "detail": "Historical guide gives six factors: remit; organised activity; public-safety danger and actual/anticipated financial loss or reputational harm; ongoing activity; asset recovery; prosecution prospects. Referrals require evidence/groundwork and separated inferences. Detective Inspector gives refusal reasons/alternatives;10workingdays is an aim with updates, not a current Gateway rule.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF5–9; PDF12 feedback",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-referral-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ipo-board-delivery",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo-board",
      "target": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "label": "was assigned setting strategy delivery milestones",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-strategy2022"
      ],
      "summary": "2022 strategy says IPO Board will set milestones in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. The source supplies a policy design, not an inspected adopted board resolution or private veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ipo-board-delivery",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo-board",
        "target": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "label": "was assigned setting strategy delivery milestones",
        "detail": "2022 strategy says IPO Board will set milestones in consultation with ministers, partners and stakeholders. The source supplies a policy design, not an inspected adopted board resolution or private veto.",
        "date": "2022-02-04 – 2022-02-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Next steps and implementation",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-strategy2022"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ipcg-delivery",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-ipcg-delivery",
      "label": "reported establishing a mixed industry/enforcement delivery group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ipcg-delivery",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-ipcg-delivery",
        "label": "reported establishing a mixed industry/enforcement delivery group",
        "detail": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
        "date": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Complete Counter infringement section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ipcg-advisory",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-ipcg-industry-advisory",
      "label": "reported establishing an industry advisory committee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ipcg-advisory",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-ipcg-industry-advisory",
        "label": "reported establishing an industry advisory committee",
        "detail": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
        "date": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Complete Counter infringement section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ipcg-executive",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-ipcg-executive",
      "label": "reported an executive board for tactical/strategic coordination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ipcg-executive",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-ipcg-executive",
        "label": "reported an executive board for tactical/strategic coordination",
        "detail": "FY2022/23 Counter infringement account describes implemented coordination machinery. No charter, votes, current2026membership or individual police-case approval established.",
        "date": "FY2022/23; HTML updated9January2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Complete Counter infringement section",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-reported-agreement-signing",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
      "label": "was attributed participation in signing the2026/27Service Agreement",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Post metadata29May2026; event described as that week",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Displayed IPO accounts describe an annual2026/27 Service Agreement as the first of the three-year funding arrangement; main metadata29May2026 does not fix the event day. Contract and signature images not obtained; account alias not independently authenticated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-reported-agreement-signing",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
        "label": "was attributed participation in signing the2026/27Service Agreement",
        "detail": "Displayed IPO accounts describe an annual2026/27 Service Agreement as the first of the three-year funding arrangement; main metadata29May2026 does not fix the event day. Contract and signature images not obtained; account alias not independently authenticated.",
        "date": "Post metadata29May2026; event described as that week",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Main and embedded post; main JSON-LD/caption",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-reported-police-signing",
      "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
      "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
      "label": "was attributed participation in the annual agreement signing",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Caption/body names Adam Williams and Pete O’Doherty in the signing account. This is text-attributed event evidence, not visual verification of signatures or an executed agreement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-reported-police-signing",
        "source": "w29-enf-city-police",
        "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
        "label": "was attributed participation in the annual agreement signing",
        "detail": "Caption/body names Adam Williams and Pete O’Doherty in the signing account. This is text-attributed event evidence, not visual verification of signatures or an executed agreement.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Post body and image caption",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-attendance",
      "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
      "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
      "label": "was attributed attendance through its Director General",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026",
        "w29-enf-s-alliance-about"
      ],
      "summary": "Post identifies Dan/Daniel Guthrie as attendee. Alliance About page supports his role. Attendance is not evidence of being a contracting signatory, contributing money or approving police priorities.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-attendance",
        "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
        "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
        "label": "was attributed attendance through its Director General",
        "detail": "Post identifies Dan/Daniel Guthrie as attendee. Alliance About page supports his role. Attendance is not evidence of being a contracting signatory, contributing money or approving police priorities.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "affiliation",
        "evidence": "Post attendee paragraph; Alliance About staff role",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026",
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-about"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-sky-attendance",
      "source": "w29-enf-sky-role",
      "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
      "label": "was attributed attendance",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Post identifies Matthew Hibbert, Sky Anti-Piracy Director. No executed contract, payment or police decision right follows from attendance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-sky-attendance",
        "source": "w29-enf-sky-role",
        "target": "w29-enf-signing2026",
        "label": "was attributed attendance",
        "detail": "Post identifies Matthew Hibbert, Sky Anti-Piracy Director. No executed contract, payment or police decision right follows from attendance.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "affiliation",
        "evidence": "Post attendee paragraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-business-proposal",
      "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
      "target": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
      "label": "submitted a business-verification proposal in the CMA record",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "InternalAugust2020; published8December2020",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020",
        "w29-enf-s-cma-index"
      ],
      "summary": "InternalAugust2020 document advocates stronger business identity checks and infrastructure/payment consequences. Exact submission day unknown;8December2020 is CMA publication, not filing or decision date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-business-proposal",
        "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
        "target": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
        "label": "submitted a business-verification proposal in the CMA record",
        "detail": "InternalAugust2020 document advocates stronger business identity checks and infrastructure/payment consequences. Exact submission day unknown;8December2020 is CMA publication, not filing or decision date.",
        "date": "InternalAugust2020; published8December2020",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Alliance PDF3 Q5–8; PDF1 date; CMA response list",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020",
          "w29-enf-s-cma-index"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-bpi-business-proposal",
      "source": "w29-enf-bpi",
      "target": "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
      "label": "proposed stopping services for withheld or incorrect business identity",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Redacted versionNovember2020; published8December2020",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Public redacted versionNovember2020 specifies identity/contact/entity-person checks and conditional bank details. The operative proposal stops service for withheld/incorrect information without separately requiring proved infringement in that clause. Scope is business customers, not every consumer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-bpi-business-proposal",
        "source": "w29-enf-bpi",
        "target": "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
        "label": "proposed stopping services for withheld or incorrect business identity",
        "detail": "Public redacted versionNovember2020 specifies identity/contact/entity-person checks and conditional bank details. The operative proposal stops service for withheld/incorrect information without separately requiring proved infringement in that clause. Scope is business customers, not every consumer.",
        "date": "Redacted versionNovember2020; published8December2020",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF17 §4.2.2; PDF18 redacted-version label",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-cma-published-alliance",
      "source": "w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
      "target": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
      "label": "published the response on8December2020",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
        "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-cma-published-alliance",
        "source": "w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
        "target": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
        "label": "published the response on8December2020",
        "detail": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
        "date": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "publication",
        "evidence": "CMA response list/update8December2020",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-cma-published-bpi",
      "source": "w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
      "target": "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
      "label": "published the response on8December2020",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
        "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-cma-published-bpi",
        "source": "w29-enf-cma-taskforce",
        "target": "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
        "label": "published the response on8December2020",
        "detail": "Official index identifies publication of this response. Consultation deadline31July2020 does not date its receipt; publication does not establish adoption of its KYBC wording.",
        "date": "2020-12-08 – 2020-12-08",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "publication",
        "evidence": "CMA response list/update8December2020",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce"
          },
          {
            "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
          "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-parliamentary-route",
      "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
      "target": "w29-enf-alliance-osb2021",
      "label": "advocated a legislative business-verification duty to parliament",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "InternalSeptember2021; exact publication day unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-alliance-osb2021"
      ],
      "summary": "OSB0016 internalSeptember2021 asks for a suitable legislative vehicle across infrastructure. Its citation to broad CMA unlawful-activity concerns is not exact policy adoption. Original PDF not retained; complete three-page primary reader supports the claim.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-parliamentary-route",
        "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
        "target": "w29-enf-alliance-osb2021",
        "label": "advocated a legislative business-verification duty to parliament",
        "detail": "OSB0016 internalSeptember2021 asks for a suitable legislative vehicle across infrastructure. Its citation to broad CMA unlawful-activity concerns is not exact policy adoption. Original PDF not retained; complete three-page primary reader supports the claim.",
        "date": "InternalSeptember2021; exact publication day unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3; Summary/internal date",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-osb2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-current-position",
      "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
      "target": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
      "label": "retains a similar business-verification position in current-captured material",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Observed9September2026; publication/update date unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-alliance-online",
        "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020"
      ],
      "summary": "Undated Online Accountability page supports KYBC across hosting, advertising, proxies, payments and marketplaces. This is a comparison to the dated proposal, not an asserted unchanged text/version chain or a current enacted duty.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-alliance-current-position",
        "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
        "target": "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
        "label": "retains a similar business-verification position in current-captured material",
        "detail": "Undated Online Accountability page supports KYBC across hosting, advertising, proxies, payments and marketplaces. This is a comparison to the dated proposal, not an asserted unchanged text/version chain or a current enacted duty.",
        "date": "Observed9September2026; publication/update date unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Online Accountability, KYBC sections;2020PDF3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
            "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability"
          },
          {
            "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-online",
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rightsholder-authorship",
      "source": "w29-enf-cic-rightsholders",
      "target": "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
      "label": "is attributed authorship of the annexed KYBC briefing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Annex-labelledSeptember2021; carried in2022document",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
      ],
      "summary": "MPA identifies rightsholder organisations on the CIC IP subgroup. The record does not demonstrate full-CIC or government adoption, nor independently verify a September2021 public tabling date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rightsholder-authorship",
        "source": "w29-enf-cic-rightsholders",
        "target": "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
        "label": "is attributed authorship of the annexed KYBC briefing",
        "detail": "MPA identifies rightsholder organisations on the CIC IP subgroup. The record does not demonstrate full-CIC or government adoption, nor independently verify a September2021 public tabling date.",
        "date": "Annex-labelledSeptember2021; carried in2022document",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Annex2 heading/Summary/Q1–5 PDF9–13; Annex1PDF8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-parliamentary-evidence",
      "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
      "target": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
      "label": "submitted evidence advocating KYBC and cross-department coordination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Internal10May2022",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
      ],
      "summary": "FDF0068 internal10May2022 asks departments to join the IPO forum and enact business-verification duties. Internal date is preserved without manufacturing a publication day or acceptance result.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-parliamentary-evidence",
        "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
        "target": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
        "label": "submitted evidence advocating KYBC and cross-department coordination",
        "detail": "FDF0068 internal10May2022 asks departments to join the IPO forum and enact business-verification duties. Internal date is preserved without manufacturing a publication day or acceptance result.",
        "date": "Internal10May2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Main §§19–28 PDF5–7; internal datePDF21",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-carried-briefing",
      "source": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
      "target": "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
      "label": "reproduced the rightsholder briefing as an annex",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Internal10May2022; annex-labelledSeptember2021",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
      ],
      "summary": "Annex is an actual documentary transmission, broader than a similarity inference. Q1–5 includes stopping services where a commercial customer fails or cannot be verified. This does not create duties or establish accepted wording.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-carried-briefing",
        "source": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
        "target": "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021",
        "label": "reproduced the rightsholder briefing as an annex",
        "detail": "Annex is an actual documentary transmission, broader than a similarity inference. Q1–5 includes stopping services where a commercial customer fails or cannot be verified. This does not create duties or establish accepted wording.",
        "date": "Internal10May2022; annex-labelledSeptember2021",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "publication",
        "evidence": "Annex2 PDF9–13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
      "source": "w29-enf-rusi",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "published the co-funded research report",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 corrected version",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "Corrected March2021 report names authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko. The authors claim findings were independent of funders;77interviews and two funder-excluding validation workshops are self-described methods. Funding, primary-data contribution and final editorial control are not interchangeable.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
        "source": "w29-enf-rusi",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "published the co-funded research report",
        "detail": "Corrected March2021 report names authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko. The authors claim findings were independent of funders;77interviews and two funder-excluding validation workshops are self-described methods. Funding, primary-data contribution and final editorial control are not interchangeable.",
        "date": "March2021 corrected version",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "publication",
        "evidence": "PDF2–3,8,18–19",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 report disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
        "detail": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.",
        "date": "March2021 report disclosure",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF8 funding and independence acknowledgment",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
      "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 report disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
        "source": "w29-enf-alliance",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
        "detail": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.",
        "date": "March2021 report disclosure",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF8 funding and independence acknowledgment",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
      "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 report disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
        "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
        "detail": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.",
        "date": "March2021 report disclosure",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF8 funding and independence acknowledgment",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
      "source": "w29-enf-industry-trust",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 report disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
        "source": "w29-enf-industry-trust",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
        "detail": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.",
        "date": "March2021 report disclosure",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF8 funding and independence acknowledgment",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
      "source": "w29-enf-premier-league",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 report disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
        "source": "w29-enf-premier-league",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
        "detail": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.",
        "date": "March2021 report disclosure",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF8 funding and independence acknowledgment",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
      "source": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
      "label": "recommends verification and proportionate financial interventions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2021 corrected report",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "Recommendation4 seeks record/verification to extent possible and resources for compliance. Recommendation14 proposes that financial institutions seek existing lists and take appropriate actions including termination orSAR. Recommendation15 promotes reasonable identity best practice without waiting for formal KYBC. These are authored proposals, not established list entitlements or performed disruptions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
        "source": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
        "label": "recommends verification and proportionate financial interventions",
        "detail": "Recommendation4 seeks record/verification to extent possible and resources for compliance. Recommendation14 proposes that financial institutions seek existing lists and take appropriate actions including termination orSAR. Recommendation15 promotes reasonable identity best practice without waiting for formal KYBC. These are authored proposals, not established list entitlements or performed disruptions.",
        "date": "March2021 corrected report",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF82 recommendation4; PDF83 recommendations14–15",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation",
      "source": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
      "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
      "label": "quotes the2021 report in parliamentary advocacy",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "MPA internal10May2022",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068",
        "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
      ],
      "summary": "Main§18 and footnote12 name and cite this report, quoting its executive-summary KYBC passage. That is a concrete co-funder→report→later-citation route. Quotation is from PDF12 executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation4; funding did not itself prove dictation or government adoption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation",
        "source": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
        "target": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
        "label": "quotes the2021 report in parliamentary advocacy",
        "detail": "Main§18 and footnote12 name and cite this report, quoting its executive-summary KYBC passage. That is a concrete co-funder→report→later-citation route. Quotation is from PDF12 executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation4; funding did not itself prove dictation or government adoption.",
        "date": "MPA internal10May2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "publication",
        "evidence": "MPA HTML§18/fn12; RUSIPDF12",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          },
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068",
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-music-kybc-consideration",
      "source": "w29-enf-music-response2021",
      "target": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
      "label": "records government attention and IPO-led consideration",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-09-22 – 2021-09-22",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-music-response2021"
      ],
      "summary": "Response to recommendation23 received15September/published22September2021 says government is considering concerns across departments. No final KYBC obligation, verifier, sanction or appeal is created by this text; no exclusive Alliance/MPA drafting path asserted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-music-kybc-consideration",
        "source": "w29-enf-music-response2021",
        "target": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
        "label": "records government attention and IPO-led consideration",
        "detail": "Response to recommendation23 received15September/published22September2021 says government is considering concerns across departments. No final KYBC obligation, verifier, sanction or appeal is created by this text; no exclusive Alliance/MPA drafting path asserted.",
        "date": "2021-09-22 – 2021-09-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Recommendation23 and full response PDF10–11/printed8–9",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-music-response2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-ipo-kybc-forums",
      "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "target": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
      "label": "reported cross-departmental KYBC work",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2022strategy andFY2022/23report; exact meeting dates unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-strategy2022",
        "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
      ],
      "summary": "2022strategy and FY2022/23 report explicitly describe KYBC consideration and several Whitehall forums. MPA requests more departmental participation but is not thereby author of government policy or a voting member. Actual meeting dispositions/approved drafting remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-ipo-kybc-forums",
        "source": "w29-enf-ipo",
        "target": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
        "label": "reported cross-departmental KYBC work",
        "detail": "2022strategy and FY2022/23 report explicitly describe KYBC consideration and several Whitehall forums. MPA requests more departmental participation but is not thereby author of government policy or a voting member. Actual meeting dispositions/approved drafting remain not obtained.",
        "date": "2022strategy andFY2022/23report; exact meeting dates unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Strategy Policy/KYBC paragraph; annual report Counter infringement",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-strategy2022",
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-forum-request",
      "source": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
      "target": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
      "label": "asks departments to join and advance KYBC work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Internal10May2022",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
      ],
      "summary": "MPA asks the Committee to encourage cross-government participation. This is a request, not proof every named department joined or approved its proposed cessation rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-mpa-forum-request",
        "source": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
        "target": "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
        "label": "asks departments to join and advance KYBC work",
        "detail": "MPA asks the Committee to encourage cross-government participation. This is a request, not proof every named department joined or approved its proposed cessation rule.",
        "date": "Internal10May2022",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Main §§25–28",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-sector-vision-exploration",
      "source": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
      "target": "w29-enf-sector-vision2023",
      "label": "published further exploration of potential KYBC solutions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2023",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-sector-vision2023"
      ],
      "summary": "June2023 Sector Vision says government will work with technology and creative sectors after roundtables to explore KYBC potential. The item does not supply enacted duties, accepted text or departmental sanction powers.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-sector-vision-exploration",
        "source": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
        "target": "w29-enf-sector-vision2023",
        "label": "published further exploration of potential KYBC solutions",
        "detail": "June2023 Sector Vision says government will work with technology and creative sectors after roundtables to explore KYBC potential. The item does not supply enacted duties, accepted text or departmental sanction powers.",
        "date": "June2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF21/printed18 KYBC item",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-sector-vision2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-proposal",
      "source": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
      "target": "w29-enf-oap2023",
      "label": "published proposed systems duties and regulatory design",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023"
      ],
      "summary": "July2023 response proposes paid-for/reciprocal illegal-ad duties on platforms/intermediaries/publishers plus a separate under18 strand. Direct advertisers are excluded from the proposed new regime, with checks shaped through PIP measures. Owned media/free classifieds excluded. More consultation and legislation subject to parliamentary time remained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-proposal",
        "source": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
        "target": "w29-enf-oap2023",
        "label": "published proposed systems duties and regulatory design",
        "detail": "July2023 response proposes paid-for/reciprocal illegal-ad duties on platforms/intermediaries/publishers plus a separate under18 strand. Direct advertisers are excluded from the proposed new regime, with checks shaped through PIP measures. Owned media/free classifieds excluded. More consultation and legislation subject to parliamentary time remained.",
        "date": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Executive summary/next steps; Part1 Our response; completePart4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-check-design",
      "source": "w29-enf-oap2023",
      "target": "w29-enf-advertising-check-design",
      "label": "sets limits on proposed identity-check design",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Government response makes identity verification necessary/appropriate and leaves extent to future regulators. It favours good-practice incentives rather than punishing every breach. These are government design choices distinct from respondents’ pre-vetting/SME/privacy concerns. This is a proposed regime design, not a completed regulator decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-check-design",
        "source": "w29-enf-oap2023",
        "target": "w29-enf-advertising-check-design",
        "label": "sets limits on proposed identity-check design",
        "detail": "Government response makes identity verification necessary/appropriate and leaves extent to future regulators. It favours good-practice incentives rather than punishing every breach. These are government design choices distinct from respondents’ pre-vetting/SME/privacy concerns. This is a proposed regime design, not a completed regulator decision.",
        "date": "2023-07-25 – 2023-07-25",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Part4 government response/next steps",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-iab-working-group-proposal",
      "source": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
      "target": "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
      "label": "presented draft terms and year plan to the taskforce",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
      ],
      "summary": "26February2026 minutes attribute presentation to IAB UK’s Sinead Coogan-Jobes. Terms were not acquired; presentation is not regulatory authority or proof of completed standards/disruption.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-iab-working-group-proposal",
        "source": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
        "target": "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
        "label": "presented draft terms and year plan to the taskforce",
        "detail": "26February2026 minutes attribute presentation to IAB UK’s Sinead Coogan-Jobes. Terms were not acquired; presentation is not regulatory authority or proof of completed standards/disruption.",
        "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Minutes §4 PDF2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-taskforce-workplan-agreement",
      "source": "w29-enf-oat",
      "target": "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
      "label": "recorded members agreeing draft terms and year plan",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Minutes record agreement of the draft after setup followingNovember2025 meeting. The record does not identify individual votes, full terms, compulsory powers or completed enforcement outcomes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-taskforce-workplan-agreement",
        "source": "w29-enf-oat",
        "target": "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
        "label": "recorded members agreeing draft terms and year plan",
        "detail": "Minutes record agreement of the draft after setup followingNovember2025 meeting. The record does not identify individual votes, full terms, compulsory powers or completed enforcement outcomes.",
        "date": "2026-02-26 – 2026-02-26",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Minutes §4 PDF2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-home-office",
      "source": "home-office",
      "target": "w29-enf-oat",
      "label": "was named a launcher of the anti-fraud advertising partnership",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 strategy",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
      ],
      "summary": "March2026 strategy§55 says Home Office andDCMS launched a partnership withIABUK under the taskforce, to report to ministers early2027. This dated account is not an accepted report/output or compulsory identity regime.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-home-office",
        "source": "home-office",
        "target": "w29-enf-oat",
        "label": "was named a launcher of the anti-fraud advertising partnership",
        "detail": "March2026 strategy§55 says Home Office andDCMS launched a partnership withIABUK under the taskforce, to report to ministers early2027. This dated account is not an accepted report/output or compulsory identity regime.",
        "date": "March2026 strategy",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "§4.4 paragraph55 PDF27/printed23",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-dcms",
      "source": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
      "target": "w29-enf-oat",
      "label": "was named a launcher alongside Home Office",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 strategy",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Same March2026 account names DCMS and IABUK. No hidden transfer of statutory powers or responsibility to industry established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-dcms",
        "source": "w29-enf-dcms-current",
        "target": "w29-enf-oat",
        "label": "was named a launcher alongside Home Office",
        "detail": "Same March2026 account names DCMS and IABUK. No hidden transfer of statutory powers or responsibility to industry established.",
        "date": "March2026 strategy",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Paragraph55",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-iab",
      "source": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
      "target": "w29-enf-oat",
      "label": "was named industry partner for anti-fraud work",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 strategy",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Government describes the partnership and future report-back. No financial contribution or veto is disclosed in the inspected passage.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-advertising-partnership-iab",
        "source": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
        "target": "w29-enf-oat",
        "label": "was named industry partner for anti-fraud work",
        "detail": "Government describes the partnership and future report-back. No financial contribution or veto is disclosed in the inspected passage.",
        "date": "March2026 strategy",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "operations",
        "evidence": "Paragraph55",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-conditional-advertising-legislation",
      "source": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
      "target": "w29-enf-oat",
      "label": "describes report-back and conditional future legislation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 strategy; report expectedearly2027",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026",
        "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Government says partnership reports to ministers early2027 and it will legislate within this Parliament if industry/market measures are insufficient. This is a conditional policy commitment, not an enacted new power, a finding of failure or an identified bill.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-conditional-advertising-legislation",
        "source": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
        "target": "w29-enf-oat",
        "label": "describes report-back and conditional future legislation",
        "detail": "Government says partnership reports to ministers early2027 and it will legislate within this Parliament if industry/market measures are insufficient. This is a conditional policy commitment, not an enacted new power, a finding of failure or an identified bill.",
        "date": "March2026 strategy; report expectedearly2027",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "FraudStrategy paragraph55; OAT§4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026",
          "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-fraud-strategy-osa-account",
      "source": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
      "target": "w7-policy-osa",
      "label": "separately describes enacted fraudulent-advertising duties",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026 strategy",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraph54 describes Category1/2A duties and serious-noncompliance court business-disruption mechanisms. Such measures respond to breach of statutory duties, not simply an unverified business. This is the strategy’s legal account, not a new independent statute audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-fraud-strategy-osa-account",
        "source": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
        "target": "w7-policy-osa",
        "label": "separately describes enacted fraudulent-advertising duties",
        "detail": "Paragraph54 describes Category1/2A duties and serious-noncompliance court business-disruption mechanisms. Such measures respond to breach of statutory duties, not simply an unverified business. This is the strategy’s legal account, not a new independent statute audit.",
        "date": "March2026 strategy",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraph54 PDF26–27/printed22–23",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-e-march2026-ofcom-timetable",
      "source": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "reported then-planned consultation and expected2027commencement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026; expectations not observed milestones",
      "sources": [
        "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
      ],
      "summary": "In March2026 the strategy said Ofcom aimed to consult in summer2026 with commencement expected2027 for the fraudulent-advertising strand. This must not be read as a verified September2026 status, a deadline-derived event date or the commencement of all OSA duties.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-e-march2026-ofcom-timetable",
        "source": "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "reported then-planned consultation and expected2027commencement",
        "detail": "In March2026 the strategy said Ofcom aimed to consult in summer2026 with commencement expected2027 for the fraudulent-advertising strand. This must not be read as a verified September2026 status, a deadline-derived event date or the commencement of all OSA duties.",
        "date": "March2026; expectations not observed milestones",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraph54",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-evidence",
      "source": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "submit evidence for police assessment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Revised070119MJB; released17September2021; current application unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "Released guidance requires investigation quality, lawful evidence and a rightsholder/nominee statement sufficient to support prosecution; referral alone does not approve a listing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-evidence",
        "source": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "submit evidence for police assessment",
        "detail": "Released guidance requires investigation quality, lawful evidence and a rightsholder/nominee statement sufficient to support prosecution; referral alone does not approve a listing.",
        "date": "Revised070119MJB; released17September2021; current application unknown",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF37–39 / printed25–27",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w30-class-iwl",
      "label": "assesses qualifying referrals before distribution",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "PIPCU checks the evidential standard before qualifying referrals are circulated for advertising action. No prior adjudication condition is specified in this case study; this is not a comprehensive powers opinion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w30-class-iwl",
        "label": "assesses qualifying referrals before distribution",
        "detail": "PIPCU checks the evidential standard before qualifying referrals are circulated for advertising action. No prior adjudication condition is specified in this case study; this is not a comprehensive powers opinion.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF37–39",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-tactics",
      "source": "w30-class-creative-head",
      "target": "w30-class-creative",
      "label": "determines tactics case by case",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "The Head of Unit chooses tactics under this dated Creative procedure; no named current officeholder or imported Ashiko DCI rule is asserted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-tactics",
        "source": "w30-class-creative-head",
        "target": "w30-class-creative",
        "label": "determines tactics case by case",
        "detail": "The Head of Unit chooses tactics under this dated Creative procedure; no named current officeholder or imported Ashiko DCI rule is asserted.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF38",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-notice",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w30-class-site-operators",
      "label": "contacts operators before further disruption",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "Guidance describes contact and a legitimate-operation route, followed by another review when positive contact fails. Payment-provider withdrawal is a separate request.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-notice",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w30-class-site-operators",
        "label": "contacts operators before further disruption",
        "detail": "Guidance describes contact and a legitimate-operation route, followed by another review when positive contact fails. Payment-provider withdrawal is a separate request.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF38–39",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-payment-request",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w30-class-payment-providers",
      "label": "requests withdrawal of payment services",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "The case study describes asking a provider or merchant bank to withdraw services; it supplies no provider command or proved compliance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-payment-request",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w30-class-payment-providers",
        "label": "requests withdrawal of payment services",
        "detail": "The case study describes asking a provider or merchant bank to withdraw services; it supplies no provider command or proved compliance.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF38–39",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-challenge",
      "source": "w30-class-site-operators",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "may challenge police action",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "Guidance affords website operators a challenge route; this is not the FOI access-review deadline.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-challenge",
        "source": "w30-class-site-operators",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "may challenge police action",
        "detail": "Guidance affords website operators a challenge route; this is not the FOI access-review deadline.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF38–39",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w30-class-iwl",
      "label": "removes immediately upon evidence offences ceased",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
      ],
      "summary": "The dated procedure requires immediate removal on evidence that offences have ceased; no worked recipient-wide reversal or specific mistaken-original-entry test is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w30-class-iwl",
        "label": "removes immediately upon evidence offences ceased",
        "detail": "The dated procedure requires immediate removal on evidence that offences have ceased; no worked recipient-wide reversal or specific mistaken-original-entry test is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF39",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-portal-design",
      "source": "w30-class-portal-spec",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "assigns submission acceptance to police administrators",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-17 – 2024-04-17",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-portal"
      ],
      "summary": "The17April2024 tender specifies police accept/reject permissions, limited investigator access and nonediting download users; no deployed permissions or supplier award is proved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-portal-design",
        "source": "w30-class-portal-spec",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "assigns submission acceptance to police administrators",
        "detail": "The17April2024 tender specifies police accept/reject permissions, limited investigator access and nonediting download users; no deployed permissions or supplier award is proved.",
        "date": "2024-04-17 – 2024-04-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "II.2.4 / PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-portal"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-prs-referrals",
      "source": "w30-class-prs",
      "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "label": "reports138 website referrals",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Counting period unspecified in2018/19 report",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-report2019"
      ],
      "summary": "PRS's contribution reports138 referrals, not138 accepted listings. Its2018/19 report paragraph does not specify the counting period.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-prs-referrals",
        "source": "w30-class-prs",
        "target": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "label": "reports138 website referrals",
        "detail": "PRS's contribution reports138 referrals, not138 accepted listings. Its2018/19 report paragraph does not specify the counting period.",
        "date": "Counting period unspecified in2018/19 report",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF113 / printed109",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-report2019"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution",
      "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
      "target": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
      "label": "distributes IWL for advertising decisions",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-report2019",
        "w30-class-s-iab-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "The dated report and industry guide describe list distribution and authenticated access; receipt is distinct from adopted contracts and actual advertising action.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution",
        "source": "w29-enf-pipcu",
        "target": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
        "label": "distributes IWL for advertising decisions",
        "detail": "The dated report and industry guide describe list distribution and authenticated access; receipt is distinct from adopted contracts and actual advertising action.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF59 / printed55; complete IAB guide",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-report2019",
          "w30-class-s-iab-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iab-contracts",
      "source": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
      "target": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
      "label": "recommends IWL in contracts and processes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iab-guide"
      ],
      "summary": "IAB recommends incorporating IWL data in advertising contracts/workflows and requesting PIPCU authorization. No executed advertiser agreement was acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iab-contracts",
        "source": "w29-enf-iab-uk",
        "target": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
        "label": "recommends IWL in contracts and processes",
        "detail": "IAB recommends incorporating IWL data in advertising contracts/workflows and requesting PIPCU authorization. No executed advertiser agreement was acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "four substantive guide sections",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iab-guide"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
      "source": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
      "target": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
      "label": "publishes all-licence placement condition",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-gambling-condition"
      ],
      "summary": "Current inspected condition16.1.1 requires avoiding ads on copyright-infringing destinations and reasonable steps for relevant third parties.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
        "source": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
        "target": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
        "label": "publishes all-licence placement condition",
        "detail": "Current inspected condition16.1.1 requires avoiding ads on copyright-infringing destinations and reasonable steps for relevant third parties.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "complete three-part condition",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-gambling-condition"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right",
      "source": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
      "target": "w30-class-gambling-licensees",
      "label": "requires termination-capable third-party contracts",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-gambling-condition"
      ],
      "summary": "Contracts must permit prompt termination where the licensee reasonably considers specified misplacement occurred, subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is capacity, not automatic exercise.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right",
        "source": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
        "target": "w30-class-gambling-licensees",
        "label": "requires termination-capable third-party contracts",
        "detail": "Contracts must permit prompt termination where the licensee reasonably considers specified misplacement occurred, subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is capacity, not automatic exercise.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "16.1.1(3)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-gambling-condition"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
      "source": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
      "target": "w30-class-iwl",
      "label": "encourages licensee access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2017-06-13 – 2017-06-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-gambling2017"
      ],
      "summary": "2017 announcement encourages IWL use alongside the separate licence condition. It does not make every IWL listing a universal legal prohibition.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
        "source": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
        "target": "w30-class-iwl",
        "label": "encourages licensee access",
        "detail": "2017 announcement encourages IWL use alongside the separate licence condition. It does not make every IWL listing a universal legal prohibition.",
        "date": "2017-06-13 – 2017-06-13",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "substantive news41–54",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-gambling2017"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mixed-ad-inputs",
      "source": "w30-class-thinkbox-evidence",
      "target": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
      "label": "reports mixed public and private list use",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January2018",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-thinkbox2018"
      ],
      "summary": "Anonymous agencies describe PIPCU, private research, client and internal inputs. Thinkbox paragraphs14–15 separately caution some post-purchase blocking may leave payment intact; no named deployment or transaction was independently observed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mixed-ad-inputs",
        "source": "w30-class-thinkbox-evidence",
        "target": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
        "label": "reports mixed public and private list use",
        "detail": "Anonymous agencies describe PIPCU, private research, client and internal inputs. Thinkbox paragraphs14–15 separately caution some post-purchase blocking may leave payment intact; no named deployment or transaction was independently observed.",
        "date": "January2018",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "agencyA/B accounts; paragraphs14–15",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-thinkbox2018"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
      "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "target": "w30-class-gpi",
      "label": "advertises combined official-list resource",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor describes a global court/order-list index, distinct from its own broader risk scoring. No underlying entries were inspected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
        "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "target": "w30-class-gpi",
        "label": "advertises combined official-list resource",
        "detail": "Vendor describes a global court/order-list index, distinct from its own broader risk scoring. No underlying entries were inspected.",
        "date": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "mainbody8–29",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
      "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "target": "w30-class-ipi",
      "label": "advertises independent risk assessments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018"
      ],
      "summary": "Vendor describes specialist/machine-learning assessment beyond adjudicated sites; this is a commercial methodology claim, not a court finding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
        "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "target": "w30-class-ipi",
        "label": "advertises independent risk assessments",
        "detail": "Vendor describes specialist/machine-learning assessment beyond adjudicated sites; this is a commercial methodology claim, not a court finding.",
        "date": "2018-06-25 – 2018-06-25",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "mainbody8–29",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
      "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "target": "w30-class-peer39",
      "label": "announces prospective marketplace delivery",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-05-26 – 2021-05-26",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-whitebullet-peer"
      ],
      "summary": "26May2021 announcement says planned pre-bid offering will go live inQ3; it alone does not prove completion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
        "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "target": "w30-class-peer39",
        "label": "announces prospective marketplace delivery",
        "detail": "26May2021 announcement says planned pre-bid offering will go live inQ3; it alone does not prove completion.",
        "date": "2021-05-26 – 2021-05-26",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "mainbody8–32",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet-peer"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-peer-offering",
      "source": "w30-class-peer39",
      "target": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "label": "currently advertises piracy exclusion offering",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-peer39"
      ],
      "summary": "Current marketplace counterpart lists White Bullet as providing a piracy-domain exclusion resource. Exact launch, purchaser activation and cash effects are unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-peer-offering",
        "source": "w30-class-peer39",
        "target": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "label": "currently advertises piracy exclusion offering",
        "detail": "Current marketplace counterpart lists White Bullet as providing a piracy-domain exclusion resource. Exact launch, purchaser activation and cash effects are unverified.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "actual White Bullet marketplace card",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
            "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-peer39"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-creative-estimate",
      "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "target": "w30-class-creative",
      "label": "supplies police-published advertising estimate",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "January–December2022",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-creative-metric"
      ],
      "summary": "Police attributes a58% decline in UK advertising and estimated GBP6m reduction in IWL-site advertising revenue from UK traffic, January–December2022, to White Bullet research. No original study, counterfactual or cash record acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-creative-estimate",
        "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "target": "w30-class-creative",
        "label": "supplies police-published advertising estimate",
        "detail": "Police attributes a58% decline in UK advertising and estimated GBP6m reduction in IWL-site advertising revenue from UK traffic, January–December2022, to White Bullet research. No original study, counterfactual or cash record acquired.",
        "date": "January–December2022",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "complete announcement50–67",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-metric"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent",
      "source": "w30-class-iwl",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "label": "is cited as national precedent",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2019-06-18 – 2019-06-18",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo2019"
      ],
      "summary": "WIPO2019 paragraph3 cites PIPCU's IWL as a precedent; this does not establish a UK contributor agreement or operational feed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent",
        "source": "w30-class-iwl",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "label": "is cited as national precedent",
        "detail": "WIPO2019 paragraph3 cites PIPCU's IWL as a precedent; this does not establish a UK contributor agreement or operational feed.",
        "date": "2019-06-18 – 2019-06-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "paragraph3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo2019"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "label": "provides distribution infrastructure",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-index",
        "w30-class-s-wipo2019"
      ],
      "summary": "WIPO distributes national lists and disclaims making its own infringement determinations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "label": "provides distribution infrastructure",
        "detail": "WIPO distributes national lists and disclaims making its own infringement determinations.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "current landing;2019 paragraphs9–14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-index",
          "w30-class-s-wipo2019"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
      "source": "w30-class-contributors",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "label": "supply national assessments and maintain entries",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo2019",
        "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
        "source": "w30-class-contributors",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "label": "supply national assessments and maintain entries",
        "detail": "2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "2019 paragraphs9–14; FAQ accuracy",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo2019",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "w30-class-alert-users",
      "label": "screens and approves advertising access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ permits WIPO to assess genuine advertising-business eligibility before access. Approval for any named applicant is not shown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "w30-class-alert-users",
        "label": "screens and approves advertising access",
        "detail": "FAQ permits WIPO to assess genuine advertising-business eligibility before access. Approval for any named applicant is not shown.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "eligibility/user agreement questions",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
      "source": "w30-class-contributors",
      "target": "w30-class-alert-users",
      "label": "may refuse particular users list access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ describes contributor permission/refusal with all lists the default; this is a data-access right, not control of every advertising choice.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
        "source": "w30-class-contributors",
        "target": "w30-class-alert-users",
        "label": "may refuse particular users list access",
        "detail": "FAQ describes contributor permission/refusal with all lists the default; this is a data-access right, not control of every advertising choice.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "list access question",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
      "source": "w30-class-alert-users",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "label": "select which contributor lists to use",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ permits users to choose contributor/country lists and describes manual/API access. No runtime use tested.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
        "source": "w30-class-alert-users",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "label": "select which contributor lists to use",
        "detail": "FAQ permits users to choose contributor/country lists and describes manual/API access. No runtime use tested.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "list selection/access questions",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "target": "w30-class-alert-users",
      "label": "limits described use to preventing misplaced ads",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ summarizes an advertising-only user agreement and confidentiality obligations; free access is described, with no executed current schedule or subsidy amount.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "target": "w30-class-alert-users",
        "label": "limits described use to preventing misplaced ads",
        "detail": "FAQ summarizes an advertising-only user agreement and confidentiality obligations; free access is described, with no executed current schedule or subsidy amount.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "user agreement and fees questions",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
      "source": "w30-class-site-operators",
      "target": "w30-class-contributors",
      "label": "seek correction through applicable national process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo2019",
        "w30-class-s-wipo-procedures"
      ],
      "summary": "2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
        "source": "w30-class-site-operators",
        "target": "w30-class-contributors",
        "label": "seek correction through applicable national process",
        "detail": "2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "paragraphs9–14; Brazil/Japan tables",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo2019",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-procedures"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "target": "w30-class-contributors",
      "label": "describes cross-list deletion notification",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
      ],
      "summary": "FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "target": "w30-class-contributors",
        "label": "describes cross-list deletion notification",
        "detail": "FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "cross-list deletion facility",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use",
      "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
      "label": "reports membership and use alongside own assessments",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-05-05 – 2021-05-05",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-whitebullet-wipo"
      ],
      "summary": "White Bullet's5May2021 account names WIPO ALERT membership and combined official/private data offering; no executed licence or item-level ingestion audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use",
        "source": "w30-class-whitebullet",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
        "label": "reports membership and use alongside own assessments",
        "detail": "White Bullet's5May2021 account names WIPO ALERT membership and combined official/private data offering; no executed licence or item-level ingestion audit.",
        "date": "2021-05-05 – 2021-05-05",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "mainbody8–24",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet-wipo"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "w30-class-pay",
      "label": "administers formalities, notices and review requests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
        "w30-class-s-pay-activities"
      ],
      "summary": "Presentation assigns hosting, completeness/attestation checks, notices and review administration to WIPO; contested-merits decision rules and recipient restoration duties remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "w30-class-pay",
        "label": "administers formalities, notices and review requests",
        "detail": "Presentation assigns hosting, completeness/attestation checks, notices and review administration to WIPO; contested-merits decision rules and recipient restoration duties remain not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "slides4–6/16; activities13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
          "w30-class-s-pay-activities"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
      "source": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
      "target": "w30-class-pay",
      "label": "submit claims after first notice interval",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
      ],
      "summary": "Diagram describes a rightsholder notice and3workingdays before WIPO application, then WIPO completeness review/second notice and another3workingdays before PSP assessment. No completeness deadline or guaranteed six-day maximum is supplied; actual/simulated-purchase conditions are not treated as universal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
        "source": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
        "target": "w30-class-pay",
        "label": "submit claims after first notice interval",
        "detail": "Diagram describes a rightsholder notice and3workingdays before WIPO application, then WIPO completeness review/second notice and another3workingdays before PSP assessment. No completeness deadline or guaranteed six-day maximum is supplied; actual/simulated-purchase conditions are not treated as universal.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "slide6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
      "source": "w30-class-pay",
      "target": "w30-class-payment-providers",
      "label": "transmits claims for provider-specific decisions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
        "w30-class-s-pay-activities"
      ],
      "summary": "Providers choose action, if any, under existing policies; WIPO does not order automatic merchant termination. Named development providers are not the anonymous pilot identities.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
        "source": "w30-class-pay",
        "target": "w30-class-payment-providers",
        "label": "transmits claims for provider-specific decisions",
        "detail": "Providers choose action, if any, under existing policies; WIPO does not order automatic merchant termination. Named development providers are not the anonymous pilot identities.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "slides4–5; activities13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
          "w30-class-s-pay-activities"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-pay-named-mc",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "mastercard",
      "label": "names provider in programme description",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2026 presentation; posted16June2026",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
      ],
      "summary": "WIPO slide4 names this provider in the programme description. Slide7 does not identify either historical pilot PSP; no provider-executed agreement acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-pay-named-mc",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "mastercard",
        "label": "names provider in programme description",
        "detail": "WIPO slide4 names this provider in the programme description. Slide7 does not identify either historical pilot PSP; no provider-executed agreement acquired.",
        "date": "June2026 presentation; posted16June2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "slides4/7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-pay-named-paypal",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "paypal",
      "label": "names provider in programme description",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2026 presentation; posted16June2026",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
      ],
      "summary": "WIPO slide4 names this provider in the programme description. Slide7 does not identify either historical pilot PSP; no provider-executed agreement acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-pay-named-paypal",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "paypal",
        "label": "names provider in programme description",
        "detail": "WIPO slide4 names this provider in the programme description. Slide7 does not identify either historical pilot PSP; no provider-executed agreement acquired.",
        "date": "June2026 presentation; posted16June2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "slides4/7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "w30-class-pay-pilot",
      "label": "reports manual pilot and composite removals",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "November2024–August2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
      ],
      "summary": "Deck reports November2024–August2025 pilot, six rightsholders/two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% sites offline OR goods removed. No closure numerator, permanent effect, causal attribution, lost revenue or independent evaluation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "w30-class-pay-pilot",
        "label": "reports manual pilot and composite removals",
        "detail": "Deck reports November2024–August2025 pilot, six rightsholders/two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% sites offline OR goods removed. No closure numerator, permanent effect, causal attribution, lost revenue or independent evaluation established.",
        "date": "November2024–August2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "slides7–8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-approval",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo-member-states",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
      "label": "approved biennial programme",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "July2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-approval"
      ],
      "summary": "Official budget page reports Member State approval inJuly2025, with Director General submission and annual reporting. No product acceptance or private-provider command inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-approval",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo-member-states",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
        "label": "approved biennial programme",
        "detail": "Official budget page reports Member State approval inJuly2025, with Director General submission and annual reporting. No product acceptance or private-provider command inferred.",
        "date": "July2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "opening approval and reporting/monitoring",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-approval"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
      "target": "w30-class-pay",
      "label": "includes planned deployment priority",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-budget"
      ],
      "summary": "Approved2026/27 programme names ALERT-PAY deployment. Broader result/sector sums are not allocated to this tool.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
        "target": "w30-class-pay",
        "label": "includes planned deployment priority",
        "detail": "Approved2026/27 programme names ALERT-PAY deployment. Broader result/sector sums are not allocated to this tool.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF54–55 / printed53–54",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-budget"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
      "label": "allocates broader result budget",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-budget"
      ],
      "summary": "Programme allocates CHF2.858m to ER2.3, not to ALERT-PAY alone; no private PSP finance or supplier payment is established. Financial details: value: 2,858,000; currency: CHF; kind: broader ER2.3 budget allocation; not Pay earmark; period: 2026/27",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
        "label": "allocates broader result budget",
        "detail": "Programme allocates CHF2.858m to ER2.3, not to ALERT-PAY alone; no private PSP finance or supplier payment is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF57–59",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-budget"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 2,858,000; currency: CHF; kind: broader ER2.3 budget allocation; not Pay earmark; period: 2026/27"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend",
      "source": "w30-class-wipo",
      "target": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
      "label": "reports broader pre-IPSAS expenditure",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-wipo-spend"
      ],
      "summary": "WIPO reports CHF3.207m pre-IPSAS actual expenditure for ER2.3 in2024/25. It is not a Pay project cost or bank transfer; broader sector totals are non-additive context. Financial details: value: 3,207,000; currency: CHF; kind: reported ER2.3 pre-IPSAS expenditure; not Pay cost; period: 2024/25",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend",
        "source": "w30-class-wipo",
        "target": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
        "label": "reports broader pre-IPSAS expenditure",
        "detail": "WIPO reports CHF3.207m pre-IPSAS actual expenditure for ER2.3 in2024/25. It is not a Pay project cost or bank transfer; broader sector totals are non-additive context.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF10–11/28/70",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-spend"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 3,207,000; currency: CHF; kind: reported ER2.3 pre-IPSAS expenditure; not Pay cost; period: 2024/25"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mc-referral",
      "source": "w30-class-ip-claimants",
      "target": "mastercard",
      "label": "may submit qualifying IP referrals under general policy",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
      ],
      "summary": "General Anti-Piracy Policy permits rights-owner/authorized-association referrals with evidence and attestations. This does not prove a WIPO ALERT-PAY intake route or accepted Creative request.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mc-referral",
        "source": "w30-class-ip-claimants",
        "target": "mastercard",
        "label": "may submit qualifying IP referrals under general policy",
        "detail": "General Anti-Piracy Policy permits rights-owner/authorized-association referrals with evidence and attestations. This does not prove a WIPO ALERT-PAY intake route or accepted Creative request.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "sections1–2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "mc-acquirers",
      "label": "requires investigation and reporting",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
      ],
      "summary": "Policy requires acquirer investigation/reporting within2businessdays for law-enforcement evidence or5 for qualifying private referrals, with discretionary extensions. WIPO is not classified as law enforcement here; clocks are not added to WIPO notice periods.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "mc-acquirers",
        "label": "requires investigation and reporting",
        "detail": "Policy requires acquirer investigation/reporting within2businessdays for law-enforcement evidence or5 for qualifying private referrals, with discretionary extensions. WIPO is not classified as law enforcement here; clocks are not added to WIPO notice periods.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "sections1–2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
      "source": "mc-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-merchants",
      "label": "must end acceptance for affirmatively infringing products",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
      ],
      "summary": "An affirmative policy finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; negative findings require compelling evidence. Product cessation is not automatically full merchant termination.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
        "source": "mc-acquirers",
        "target": "w30-class-merchants",
        "label": "must end acceptance for affirmatively infringing products",
        "detail": "An affirmative policy finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; negative findings require compelling evidence. Product cessation is not automatically full merchant termination.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "sections1–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
      "source": "mc-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "must report applicable merchant termination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
      ],
      "summary": "Anti-Piracy Policy conditionally requires MATCH notice if the acquirer terminates the merchant; no particular WIPO/Creative merchant report is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
        "source": "mc-acquirers",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "must report applicable merchant termination",
        "detail": "Anti-Piracy Policy conditionally requires MATCH notice if the acquirer terminates the merchant; no particular WIPO/Creative merchant report is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "sections1–2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "mc-acquirers",
      "label": "retains policy interpretation and membership sanctions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
      ],
      "summary": "Mastercard reserves interpretation/enforcement and possible membership restriction or sanctions for noncompliance. No exercised sanction in this packet.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "mc-acquirers",
        "label": "retains policy interpretation and membership sanctions",
        "detail": "Mastercard reserves interpretation/enforcement and possible membership restriction or sanctions for noncompliance. No exercised sanction in this packet.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "section4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-paypal-referral",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "w30-class-ip-claimants",
      "label": "invites infringement reports and may take appropriate action",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-paypal-uk",
        "w30-class-s-paypal-us"
      ],
      "summary": "UK15July2026 and US6May2021 paragraphs invite rights-owner reports and permit appropriate action where needed. They disclose no ALERT-PAY-specific deadline, automatic termination or appeal clock; locale entities do not identify the pilot contract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-paypal-referral",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "w30-class-ip-claimants",
        "label": "invites infringement reports and may take appropriate action",
        "detail": "UK15July2026 and US6May2021 paragraphs invite rights-owner reports and permit appropriate action where needed. They disclose no ALERT-PAY-specific deadline, automatic termination or appeal clock; locale entities do not identify the pilot contract.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "complete short policies",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full"
          },
          {
            "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
            "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-paypal-uk",
          "w30-class-s-paypal-us"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-access",
      "source": "mc-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-match-users",
      "label": "approve service-provider access within registration rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Chapter11 requires relevant service-provider registration/provisioning and acquirer approval. No authorization was exercised by this inquiry.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-access",
        "source": "mc-acquirers",
        "target": "w30-class-match-users",
        "label": "approve service-provider access within registration rules",
        "detail": "Chapter11 requires relevant service-provider registration/provisioning and acquirer approval. No authorization was exercised by this inquiry.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "11.1–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-entry",
      "source": "mc-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "must report under qualifying termination triggers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Section11.5 combines termination by merchant/acquirer with reason to believe a listed condition exists. Five calendar days runs from earlier listed decision/notice/awareness events, not effective termination; awareness is not detached from the opening condition.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-entry",
        "source": "mc-acquirers",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "must report under qualifying termination triggers",
        "detail": "Section11.5 combines termination by merchant/acquirer with reason to believe a listed condition exists. Five calendar days runs from earlier listed decision/notice/awareness events, not effective termination; awareness is not detached from the opening condition.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "11.5 / PDF151",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
      "source": "w30-class-match-users",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "must inquire before agreement or acceptance",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Section11.6 requires inquiry before signing/enabling acceptance. Exact/phonetic or spelling hits are possible identity matches requiring relevance checks, not proof of misconduct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
        "source": "w30-class-match-users",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "must inquire before agreement or acceptance",
        "detail": "Section11.6 requires inquiry before signing/enabling acceptance. Exact/phonetic or spelling hits are possible identity matches requiring relevance checks, not proof of misconduct.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "11.4/11.6",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-admission",
      "source": "mc-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-merchants",
      "label": "may admit a listed merchant",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Sections11.2/11.6.4 expressly allow onboarding notwithstanding a MATCH entry; mandatory inquiry does not require refusal. Each institution makes its own decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-admission",
        "source": "mc-acquirers",
        "target": "w30-class-merchants",
        "label": "may admit a listed merchant",
        "detail": "Sections11.2/11.6.4 expressly allow onboarding notwithstanding a MATCH entry; mandatory inquiry does not require refusal. Each institution makes its own decision.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "11.2/11.6.4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
      "source": "mc-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "retain accuracy and reasonable-correction responsibility",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Acquirers retain accuracy responsibility when delegating work; good faith, reason-code grounds and reasonable correction are required. Removal requests require a30calendar-day response, listing questions7; neither clock guarantees removal.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
        "source": "mc-acquirers",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "retain accuracy and reasonable-correction responsibility",
        "detail": "Acquirers retain accuracy responsibility when delegating work; good faith, reason-code grounds and reasonable correction are required. Removal requests require a30calendar-day response, listing questions7; neither clock guarantees removal.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "11.4/11.5.1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
      "source": "w30-class-match",
      "target": "w30-class-match-users",
      "label": "provides retroactive alerts after inquiries",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Section11.6.4 describes alerts for later added information within365days after an inquiry, visible30days and once in batch results. Recipient next steps remain separate; no closure cascade observed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
        "source": "w30-class-match",
        "target": "w30-class-match-users",
        "label": "provides retroactive alerts after inquiries",
        "detail": "Section11.6.4 describes alerts for later added information within365days after an inquiry, visible30days and once in batch results. Recipient next steps remain separate; no closure cascade observed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "11.6.4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-purge",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "provides five-year listing purge",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Section11.10 provides5year listing retention/purge; recipient records persist at least2years after agreement end and inquiry records365days. Central purge does not erase all downstream records or restore processing.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-purge",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "provides five-year listing purge",
        "detail": "Section11.10 provides5year listing retention/purge; recipient records persist at least2years after agreement end and inquiry records365days. Central purge does not erase all downstream records or restore processing.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "11.10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-correction",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "permits early removal on specified grounds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Section11.13 permits removal for erroneous addition reported by an authorized user or specified cured PCI code12 noncompliance. Merchant direct application when acquirer unwilling/unable is narrow PCI route, not general bypass.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-correction",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "permits early removal on specified grounds",
        "detail": "Section11.13 permits removal for erroneous addition reported by an authorized user or specified cured PCI code12 noncompliance. Merchant direct application when acquirer unwilling/unable is narrow PCI route, not general bypass.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "11.13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights",
      "source": "w30-class-merchants",
      "target": "mastercard",
      "label": "may seek applicable personal-information remedies",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-match-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "March2026 notice describes law-dependent access/correction/restriction/deletion/complaint routes, with California requests to relevant institutions and other requests possibly redirected. One-month written reply is not correction deadline; no universal processing entitlement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights",
        "source": "w30-class-merchants",
        "target": "mastercard",
        "label": "may seek applicable personal-information remedies",
        "detail": "March2026 notice describes law-dependent access/correction/restriction/deletion/complaint routes, with California requests to relevant institutions and other requests possibly redirected. One-month written reply is not correction deadline; no universal processing entitlement.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "rights198–206; contact257–258",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-stripe-policy",
      "source": "stripe",
      "target": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
      "label": "publishes general disqualification with exceptions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "Stripe generally disqualifies MATCH-listed merchants but will consider documented exceptional circumstances such as identity theft. Consideration does not promise approval.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-stripe-policy",
        "source": "stripe",
        "target": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
        "label": "publishes general disqualification with exceptions",
        "detail": "Stripe generally disqualifies MATCH-listed merchants but will consider documented exceptional circumstances such as identity theft. Consideration does not promise approval.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "processing limitations169–170",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect",
      "source": "w30-class-match",
      "target": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
      "label": "is an input to restrictive underwriting",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match",
        "w30-class-s-match-rules"
      ],
      "summary": "Stripe's published practice gives MATCH a restrictive onward use. No identified Stripe decision or acquiring-bank identity is established; its1workingday summary differs from the August network5calendar-day rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect",
        "source": "w30-class-match",
        "target": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
        "label": "is an input to restrictive underwriting",
        "detail": "Stripe's published practice gives MATCH a restrictive onward use. No identified Stripe decision or acquiring-bank identity is established; its1workingday summary differs from the August network5calendar-day rule.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Stripe169–170; manual11.2/11.5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-stripe-match",
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-visa-investigation",
      "source": "visa",
      "target": "w30-class-merrick",
      "label": "initiated historical investigation route",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical2021 dispute; exact event dates not assigned here",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
      ],
      "summary": "2023 opinion describes Visa investigation followed by Merrick's termination/reporting. This is an exercised historical route, not an ALERT-PAY link or current universal Visa rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-visa-investigation",
        "source": "visa",
        "target": "w30-class-merrick",
        "label": "initiated historical investigation route",
        "detail": "2023 opinion describes Visa investigation followed by Merrick's termination/reporting. This is an exercised historical route, not an ALERT-PAY link or current universal Visa rule.",
        "date": "Historical2021 dispute; exact event dates not assigned here",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "factualIII–VIII; reader173–244",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
      "source": "w30-class-merrick",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "reported eGumball after termination",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021 dispute",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
      ],
      "summary": "The appellate record describes Merrick's termination and MATCH listing of eGumball; its record showed Merrick alone could request this listing's addition/removal. Accuracy and final remedy remain unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
        "source": "w30-class-merrick",
        "target": "w30-class-match",
        "label": "reported eGumball after termination",
        "detail": "The appellate record describes Merrick's termination and MATCH listing of eGumball; its record showed Merrick alone could request this listing's addition/removal. Accuracy and final remedy remain unresolved.",
        "date": "2021 dispute",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "reader238–244/311–325",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
      "source": "w30-class-egumball",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
      "label": "sought provisional delisting relief",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
      ],
      "summary": "Court record describes a merchant challenge seeking removal; damages and wrongdoing allegations are not adopted as findings.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
        "source": "w30-class-egumball",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
        "label": "sought provisional delisting relief",
        "detail": "Court record describes a merchant challenge seeking removal; damages and wrongdoing allegations are not adopted as findings.",
        "date": "2021",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "factualVI–VIII; DiscussionIII–IV",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
      "source": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
      "target": "w30-class-merrick",
      "label": "ordered removal requests in provisional TRO",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-11-03 – 2021-11-03",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
      ],
      "summary": "3November2021 TRO required Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal; its mandatory portion was stayed on appeal and later reversed. No performed delisting or processing restoration is proved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
        "source": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
        "target": "w30-class-merrick",
        "label": "ordered removal requests in provisional TRO",
        "detail": "3November2021 TRO required Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal; its mandatory portion was stayed on appeal and later reversed. No performed delisting or processing restoration is proved.",
        "date": "2021-11-03 – 2021-11-03",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "reader285–289/303–328",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
      "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball2023",
      "label": "reversed emergency mandatory relief",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-05-17 – 2023-05-17",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
      ],
      "summary": "17May2023 appeal reversed for insufficient showing of required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing, expressly reserving merits. Delisting alone would still need another acquirer's admission decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
        "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball2023",
        "label": "reversed emergency mandatory relief",
        "detail": "17May2023 appeal reversed for insufficient showing of required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing, expressly reserving merits. Delisting alone would still need another acquirer's admission decision.",
        "date": "2023-05-17 – 2023-05-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "DiscussionIII–IV; Disposition",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
      "source": "w30-class-merrick",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
      "label": "sought anti-SLAPP protection for MATCH report",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 appeal",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Merrick appealed denial of its special motion to strike; the2025 decision addresses procedural protected activity, not final truth or contract defenses.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
        "source": "w30-class-merrick",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
        "label": "sought anti-SLAPP protection for MATCH report",
        "detail": "Merrick appealed denial of its special motion to strike; the2025 decision addresses procedural protected activity, not final truth or contract defenses.",
        "date": "2025 appeal",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "printed7–17 / reader241–351",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
      "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
      "label": "affirmed denial at protected-activity step",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Court found this confidential commercial report did not contribute to public discussion under425.16(e)(4), while rejecting a categorical exclusion of all confidential commercial speech. Conversion was outside the motion; liability and privilege/contract defenses remain unadjudicated.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
        "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
        "label": "affirmed denial at protected-activity step",
        "detail": "Court found this confidential commercial report did not contribute to public discussion under425.16(e)(4), while rejecting a categorical exclusion of all confidential commercial speech. Conversion was outside the motion; liability and privilege/contract defenses remain unadjudicated.",
        "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "printed10–17; fn3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
      "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
      "label": "modified inverted sentence without changing judgment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-06 – 2025-05-06",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
      ],
      "summary": "6May order substitutes eGumball's assertion that processed2020/2021 transactions were directly connected to written contracts; the contrary unmodified sentence is superseded. Rehearing denied, no judgment change; the assertion is not an adjudicated fact.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
        "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
        "label": "modified inverted sentence without changing judgment",
        "detail": "6May order substitutes eGumball's assertion that processed2020/2021 transactions were directly connected to written contracts; the contrary unmodified sentence is superseded. Rehearing denied, no judgment change; the assertion is not an adjudicated fact.",
        "date": "2025-05-06 – 2025-05-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "modification reader124–133, especially127; original229",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief",
      "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball",
      "label": "ordered revised public redacted brief",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
      ],
      "summary": "Disposition ordered an updated public brief within10days concerning28specified documents while partly permitting sealing without prejudice. No actual revised filing, exhibit contents or resulting remedy acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief",
        "source": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball",
        "label": "ordered revised public redacted brief",
        "detail": "Disposition ordered an updated public brief within10days concerning28specified documents while partly permitting sealing without prejudice. No actual revised filing, exhibit contents or resulting remedy acquired.",
        "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "printed18–20; fn5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball",
      "source": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
      "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
      "label": "supplied expressly applied legal framework",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-egumball2025",
        "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
      ],
      "summary": "2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball",
        "source": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
        "target": "w30-class-egumball2025",
        "label": "supplied expressly applied legal framework",
        "detail": "2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database.",
        "date": "2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "eGumball printed13–14; FilmOn printed17–25",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2025",
          "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-historical-dv-authorship",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-inc",
      "target": "w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
      "label": "defined and sold confidential classifications",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical record described6May2019",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
      ],
      "summary": "FilmOn opinion describes DV-defined Adult Content and copyright streaming/file-sharing categories in paid confidential reports. Adult Content encompassed mature themes/language, not only pornography; categorization is not a final infringement judgment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-historical-dv-authorship",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-inc",
        "target": "w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
        "label": "defined and sold confidential classifications",
        "detail": "FilmOn opinion describes DV-defined Adult Content and copyright streaming/file-sharing categories in paid confidential reports. Adult Content encompassed mature themes/language, not only pornography; categorization is not a final infringement judgment.",
        "date": "Historical record described6May2019",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "printed3–4/22–23; PDF4–5/23–24",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-demand",
      "source": "w30-class-filmon",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-inc",
      "label": "asserted a correction and clarification demand",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2013-12-12 – 2013-12-12",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-filmon-appellant"
      ],
      "summary": "Opening brief says FilmOn demanded removal/correction on12December2013 and disputed whole-network scope and pornographic implication; underlying letters/appendix and actual later correction not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-demand",
        "source": "w30-class-filmon",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-inc",
        "label": "asserted a correction and clarification demand",
        "detail": "Opening brief says FilmOn demanded removal/correction on12December2013 and disputed whole-network scope and pornographic implication; underlying letters/appendix and actual later correction not obtained.",
        "date": "2013-12-12 – 2013-12-12",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "printed10–12 / PDF15–17",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-appellant"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-harm-allegation",
      "source": "w30-class-filmon",
      "target": "w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
      "label": "alleged false labels and advertising harm",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Historical complaint described2019",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
      ],
      "summary": "FilmOn alleged reports caused prospective/existing advertisers to refuse business; no adjudicated falsity, damages amount or independent causal estimate is supplied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-harm-allegation",
        "source": "w30-class-filmon",
        "target": "w30-class-historical-dv-reports",
        "label": "alleged false labels and advertising harm",
        "detail": "FilmOn alleged reports caused prospective/existing advertisers to refuse business; no adjudicated falsity, damages amount or independent causal estimate is supplied.",
        "date": "Historical complaint described2019",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "printed4 / PDF5",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-mpaa-amicus",
      "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
      "target": "w30-class-filmon-amicus",
      "label": "appeared under historical MPAA name as amicus",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus"
      ],
      "summary": "Filed brief names Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. among five media amici. This is the historical advocacy role, not proof of modern contracting identity, purchase of reports or funding of DV.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-mpaa-amicus",
        "source": "w1-icmec-mpa",
        "target": "w30-class-filmon-amicus",
        "label": "appeared under historical MPAA name as amicus",
        "detail": "Filed brief names Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. among five media amici. This is the historical advocacy role, not proof of modern contracting identity, purchase of reports or funding of DV.",
        "date": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3/11–18/55–56",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-amici-request",
      "source": "w30-class-filmon-amicus",
      "target": "w30-class-ca-supreme",
      "label": "requested affirmance of DV procedural protection",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus",
        "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
      ],
      "summary": "Amici described an anti-piracy advertising mechanism and requested anti-SLAPP protection. Court did not grant that disposition; overlap with concern about categorical commercial-speech exclusion is not causal adoption proof.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-amici-request",
        "source": "w30-class-filmon-amicus",
        "target": "w30-class-ca-supreme",
        "label": "requested affirmance of DV procedural protection",
        "detail": "Amici described an anti-piracy advertising mechanism and requested anti-SLAPP protection. Court did not grant that disposition; overlap with concern about categorical commercial-speech exclusion is not causal adoption proof.",
        "date": "2018-06-06 – 2018-06-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "brief PDF11–18/55; opinionPDF16–17/24/26",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus",
          "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-reversal",
      "source": "w30-class-ca-supreme",
      "target": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
      "label": "reversed protection for these confidential reports",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2019-05-06 – 2019-05-06",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
      ],
      "summary": "6May2019 Court reversed the prior appellate judgment under public-interest catchall, while rejecting FilmOn's categorical commercial/noncommercial approach. It ordered no reclassification, damages, ad purchase or restoration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-filmon-reversal",
        "source": "w30-class-ca-supreme",
        "target": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
        "label": "reversed protection for these confidential reports",
        "detail": "6May2019 Court reversed the prior appellate judgment under public-interest catchall, while rejecting FilmOn's categorical commercial/noncommercial approach. It ordered no reclassification, damages, ad purchase or restoration.",
        "date": "2019-05-06 – 2019-05-06",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "printed15–16/23–25; PDF16–17/24–26",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-classifier-offer",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
      "label": "describes proprietary classification service",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-product"
      ],
      "summary": "Current product page describes AI/human review, more than100 customer-selectable categories and separate pre-bid/post-purchase services. Vendor claims are not independent deployment or accuracy evidence.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-classifier-offer",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
        "label": "describes proprietary classification service",
        "detail": "Current product page describes AI/human review, more than100 customer-selectable categories and separate pre-bid/post-purchase services. Vendor claims are not independent deployment or accuracy evidence.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived59–111",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-product"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-customer-choice",
      "source": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
      "label": "may choose categories to avoid",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-product"
      ],
      "summary": "Public product description gives brands category choice, including otherwise legitimate material. It does not disclose override rights for every2025named default or any actual configuration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-customer-choice",
        "source": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
        "label": "may choose categories to avoid",
        "detail": "Public product description gives brands category choice, including otherwise legitimate material. It does not disclose override rights for every2025named default or any actual configuration.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "original-derived78–98",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-product"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "label": "announced future default enablement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
      ],
      "summary": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "label": "announced future default enablement",
        "detail": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state.",
        "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "original-derived96–120",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "label": "reported enabled default",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-progress"
      ],
      "summary": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "label": "reported enabled default",
        "detail": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration.",
        "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "original-derived75–80",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-progress"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-default-announced-p2p-category",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-p2p-category",
      "label": "announced future default enablement",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
      ],
      "summary": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-default-announced-p2p-category",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-p2p-category",
        "label": "announced future default enablement",
        "detail": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state.",
        "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "original-derived96–120",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-default-reported-p2p-category",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-p2p-category",
      "label": "reported enabled default",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-progress"
      ],
      "summary": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-default-reported-p2p-category",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-p2p-category",
        "label": "reported enabled default",
        "detail": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration.",
        "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "original-derived75–80",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-progress"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
      "source": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
      "label": "was reported distributed to over100 partners",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
      ],
      "summary": "February release reports distribution to more than100 platform partners; this is not a count of activated recipients or blocked services.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
        "source": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
        "label": "was reported distributed to over100 partners",
        "detail": "February release reports distribution to more than100 platform partners; this is not a count of activated recipients or blocked services.",
        "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived96–120",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-adoption",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
      "label": "reported nearly30 category implementations",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-progress"
      ],
      "summary": "April24 release says nearly30 platforms implemented Highly Illicit and offers the category free to all platforms, including nonclients. No named platform logs, blocked-site count or raw-IWF-data redistribution licence proved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-adoption",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
        "label": "reported nearly30 category implementations",
        "detail": "April24 release says nearly30 platforms implemented Highly Illicit and offers the category free to all platforms, including nonclients. No named platform logs, blocked-site count or raw-IWF-data redistribution licence proved.",
        "date": "2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived75–80",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-progress"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-review-route",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
      "label": "describes publisher review and sales separation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-06-13 – 2024-06-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-review"
      ],
      "summary": "June2024 statement describes classification-review/report-log access and separation from sales/client teams. No independent adjudicator, decision deadline, worked correction or mandatory advertiser reconsideration acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-review-route",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
        "label": "describes publisher review and sales separation",
        "detail": "June2024 statement describes classification-review/report-log access and separation from sales/client teams. No independent adjudicator, decision deadline, worked correction or mandatory advertiser reconsideration acquired.",
        "date": "2024-06-13 – 2024-06-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "original-derived72–100",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-review"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-url-access",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
      "label": "announced requestable URL-level reporting",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-25 – 2025-02-25",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-url"
      ],
      "summary": "25February2025 statement permits eligible DV advertiser measurement clients to request URL-level detail; interface and other integrations remained future plans in that announcement. It does not grant all publishers every advertiser report.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-url-access",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
        "label": "announced requestable URL-level reporting",
        "detail": "25February2025 statement permits eligible DV advertiser measurement clients to request URL-level detail; interface and other integrations remained future plans in that announcement. It does not grant all publishers every advertiser report.",
        "date": "2025-02-25 – 2025-02-25",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived72–97",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-url"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-advertiser-revenue",
      "source": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "label": "accounted for reported90percent of group revenue",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Fiscal2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2025 filing reports90% of revenue from advertisers, mainly measured transaction/impression fees, with some capped spend-based fees. No absolute sum or fee per exclusion inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-advertiser-revenue",
        "source": "w30-class-advertiser-customers",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "label": "accounted for reported90percent of group revenue",
        "detail": "FY2025 filing reports90% of revenue from advertisers, mainly measured transaction/impression fees, with some capped spend-based fees. No absolute sum or fee per exclusion inferred.",
        "date": "Fiscal2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "reader1152–1225",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-supply-revenue",
      "source": "w30-class-supply-customers",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "label": "accounted for reported10percent of group revenue",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Fiscal2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2025 filing reports10% supply-side revenue with minimum guarantees/tiered pricing. This does not establish biased classification or a payment tied to a specific exclusion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-supply-revenue",
        "source": "w30-class-supply-customers",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "label": "accounted for reported10percent of group revenue",
        "detail": "FY2025 filing reports10% supply-side revenue with minimum guarantees/tiered pricing. This does not establish biased classification or a payment tied to a specific exclusion.",
        "date": "Fiscal2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "reader1152–1225",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-business-reporting",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
      "label": "reports consolidated configuration and service model",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY2025 report",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
      ],
      "summary": "The issuer describes configuration/classification and customer feedback in product development. Consolidated disclosure is not proof of the exact historical FilmOn contracting party.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-business-reporting",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-classifier",
        "label": "reports consolidated configuration and service model",
        "detail": "The issuer describes configuration/classification and customer feedback in product development. Consolidated disclosure is not proof of the exact historical FilmOn contracting party.",
        "date": "FY2025 report",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "reader403–434",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "target": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
      "label": "publishes reviewed-notice and response aggregates",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reporting2021–2023; first publication dates not established",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-ncmec2021",
        "w30-class-s-ncmec2022",
        "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
        "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive"
      ],
      "summary": "Methodology describes staff visual review and tracked notifications, including repeated notices and possible upstream contacts.2023columns separate CSAM, non-CSAM exploitative images of identified victims and predatory text. Mixed response tables are not permanent whole-company labels or unique-incident counts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "target": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
        "label": "publishes reviewed-notice and response aggregates",
        "detail": "Methodology describes staff visual review and tracked notifications, including repeated notices and possible upstream contacts.2023columns separate CSAM, non-CSAM exploitative images of identified victims and predatory text. Mixed response tables are not permanent whole-company labels or unique-incident counts.",
        "date": "Reporting2021–2023; first publication dates not established",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "2021PDF1/10;2022PDF1/12;2023 introductions/selected rows",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-ncmec2021",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec2022",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-incoming",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "target": "w30-class-ncmec-incoming",
      "label": "publishes provider-submitted report counts",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reporting2023",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-ncmec-incoming"
      ],
      "summary": "2023table counts incoming provider reports about suspected exploitation/apparent CSAM. Variation in detection/reporting and included information prevents reading totals as outbound notices or confirmed criminal domains.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-incoming",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "target": "w30-class-ncmec-incoming",
        "label": "publishes provider-submitted report counts",
        "detail": "2023table counts incoming provider reports about suspected exploitation/apparent CSAM. Variation in detection/reporting and included information prevents reading totals as outbound notices or confirmed criminal domains.",
        "date": "Reporting2023",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF1 introduction/header",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-incoming"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
      "label": "is named as public-data origin by DV",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
      ],
      "summary": "DV identifies public NCMEC data as a starting point. This does not establish direct supply agreement, endorsement or equivalence to NCMEC's hash-sharing resource.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
        "label": "is named as public-data origin by DV",
        "detail": "DV identifies public NCMEC data as a starting point. This does not establish direct supply agreement, endorsement or equivalence to NCMEC's hash-sharing resource.",
        "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "original-derived96–120",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
      "label": "reports source selection and further assessment",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
      ],
      "summary": "DV says it reviewed three years/over300domains or providers, cross-checked existing classifications, assessed remaining sites and excluded large well-moderated social/search services. Exact years/files/columns/provider-domain mapping unknown; no misuse finding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
        "label": "reports source selection and further assessment",
        "detail": "DV says it reviewed three years/over300domains or providers, cross-checked existing classifications, assessed remaining sites and excluded large well-moderated social/search services. Exact years/files/columns/provider-domain mapping unknown; no misuse finding.",
        "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived96–120",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
      "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "label": "is described as an input to vendor category",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-defaults",
        "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
        "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive"
      ],
      "summary": "DV's own account connects selected public material to its new Highly Illicit policy through additional judgment. The acquired2021–2023tables explain why units matter but are not proven to be the exact files used.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
        "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "label": "is described as an input to vendor category",
        "detail": "DV's own account connects selected public material to its new Highly Illicit policy through additional judgment. The acquired2021–2023tables explain why units matter but are not proven to be the exact files used.",
        "date": "2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "DV96–120; NCMEC2023PDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
      "source": "iwf",
      "target": "w30-class-iwf-url",
      "label": "describes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removal",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025report section; publication date unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic"
      ],
      "summary": "IWF says URLs are rechecked daily, removed the same day when relevant content is absent, with twice-daily list updates. This is upstream maintenance evidence, not observed DV reclassification or restored placements.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
        "source": "iwf",
        "target": "w30-class-iwf-url",
        "label": "describes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removal",
        "detail": "IWF says URLs are rechecked daily, removed the same day when relevant content is absent, with twice-daily list updates. This is upstream maintenance evidence, not observed DV reclassification or restored placements.",
        "date": "2025report section; publication date unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived52–71",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
      "source": "w30-class-iwf-url",
      "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "label": "was announced as planned integration",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "April–May2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-progress",
        "w30-class-s-iwf-partnership"
      ],
      "summary": "April24 DV release and May8 IWF counterpart describe future incorporation of the URL List. They are partnership plans, not executed data terms or tested ingestion.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
        "source": "w30-class-iwf-url",
        "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "label": "was announced as planned integration",
        "detail": "April24 DV release and May8 IWF counterpart describe future incorporation of the URL List. They are partnership plans, not executed data terms or tested ingestion.",
        "date": "April–May2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "DV75–80; IWF63–67",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-progress",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-partnership"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial",
      "source": "w30-class-iwf-url",
      "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
      "label": "is described as integrated in DV testimonial",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025report section; publication date unknown",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic"
      ],
      "summary": "DV member testimonial in IWF's2025report section describes integration of IWF signals. No exact deployment date, delivery log or downstream correction chain is acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial",
        "source": "w30-class-iwf-url",
        "target": "w30-class-hi-category",
        "label": "is described as integrated in DV testimonial",
        "detail": "DV member testimonial in IWF's2025report section describes integration of IWF signals. No exact deployment date, delivery log or downstream correction chain is acquired.",
        "date": "2025report section; publication date unknown",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "original-derived75–82",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "is listed as member since1April2025",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Membership start stated; continuing status observed9September2026, not an end date.",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-directory"
      ],
      "summary": "IWF directory identifies the DV brand as member since1April2025, later than February categories. Exact legal signatory and agreement not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "is listed as member since1April2025",
        "detail": "IWF directory identifies the DV brand as member since1April2025, later than February categories. Exact legal signatory and agreement not established.",
        "date": "Membership start stated; continuing status observed9September2026, not an end date.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "DV card and nearest preceding H2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-directory"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "is disclosed in contribution band overGBP25000",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-directory"
      ],
      "summary": "IWF places DV in Members contributing over£25,000. No exact amount, upper bound, payment date, invoice period or reconciled receipt is established; do not manufacture an annual2025payment by combining the current fee page. Payment status: band reported by recipient; receipt unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "is disclosed in contribution band overGBP25000",
        "detail": "IWF places DV in Members contributing over£25,000. No exact amount, upper bound, payment date, invoice period or reconciled receipt is established; do not manufacture an annual2025payment by combining the current fee page.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "governing H2 and DV card",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-directory"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "band reported by recipient; receipt unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-fee-framework",
      "source": "w30-class-iwf-members",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "support services under stated annual fee framework",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-fees"
      ],
      "summary": "Current pricing describes sector/size-based annual GBP fees from£5,000+ to£100,000+ supporting frontline work. This is general current pricing, not the2025DV tariff or proof of a particular cash payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-fee-framework",
        "source": "w30-class-iwf-members",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "support services under stated annual fee framework",
        "detail": "Current pricing describes sector/size-based annual GBP fees from£5,000+ to£100,000+ supporting frontline work. This is general current pricing, not the2025DV tariff or proof of a particular cash payment.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "original-derived57–68",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-fees"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-member-resources",
      "source": "iwf",
      "target": "w30-class-iwf-members",
      "label": "describes licensed lists, expertise and participation benefits",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
        "w30-class-s-iwf-benefits"
      ],
      "summary": "Membership pages describe licensed dynamic lists/alerts, analyst contact, research, policy participation and publicity. No executed SLA, raw-list redistribution entitlement or proof DV used all benefits acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-member-resources",
        "source": "iwf",
        "target": "w30-class-iwf-members",
        "label": "describes licensed lists, expertise and participation benefits",
        "detail": "Membership pages describe licensed dynamic lists/alerts, analyst contact, research, policy participation and publicity. No executed SLA, raw-list redistribution entitlement or proof DV used all benefits acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "overview85–88/100–110; benefits62–79",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership benefits",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-benefits"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-council-application",
      "source": "w30-class-iwf-members",
      "target": "w30-class-iwf-council",
      "label": "may apply or nominate representatives",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
        "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
      ],
      "summary": "Current overview permits Funding Council application; FY2025report describes nomination opportunity. No automatic member seat or exercised DV nomination inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-council-application",
        "source": "w30-class-iwf-members",
        "target": "w30-class-iwf-council",
        "label": "may apply or nominate representatives",
        "detail": "Current overview permits Funding Council application; FY2025report describes nomination opportunity. No automatic member seat or exercised DV nomination inferred.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "overview107–109; reportPDF11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-council-elections",
      "source": "w30-class-iwf-council",
      "target": "w30-class-iwf-board",
      "label": "elects three industry trustees in dated report",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY ended31March2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2025report says Council supports Board with industry advice and elects three industry trustees. Board approves appointments through described processes; no reserved DV seat or individual assessment veto established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-council-elections",
        "source": "w30-class-iwf-council",
        "target": "w30-class-iwf-board",
        "label": "elects three industry trustees in dated report",
        "detail": "FY2025report says Council supports Board with industry advice and elects three industry trustees. Board approves appointments through described processes; no reserved DV seat or individual assessment veto established.",
        "date": "FY ended31March2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-board-appointments",
      "source": "w30-class-iwf-board",
      "target": "iwf",
      "label": "approves appointments under described processes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "FY ended31March2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
      ],
      "summary": "FY2025report describes11-person Board: independent chair, six other independent trustees, three industry trustees and one co-opted trustee. This is the report's arrangement, not proof of unchanged2026 composition.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-iwf-board-appointments",
        "source": "w30-class-iwf-board",
        "target": "iwf",
        "label": "approves appointments under described processes",
        "detail": "FY2025report describes11-person Board: independent chair, six other independent trustees, three industry trustees and one co-opted trustee. This is the report's arrangement, not proof of unchanged2026 composition.",
        "date": "FY ended31March2025",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-senator-blackburn",
      "source": "w30-class-blackburn",
      "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "signed February7 requests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
        "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
        "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
      ],
      "summary": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-senator-blackburn",
        "source": "w30-class-blackburn",
        "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "label": "signed February7 requests",
        "detail": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "complete signed letters",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
          "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
          "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-senator-blumenthal",
      "source": "w30-class-blumenthal",
      "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "signed February7 requests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
        "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
        "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
      ],
      "summary": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-senator-blumenthal",
        "source": "w30-class-blumenthal",
        "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "label": "signed February7 requests",
        "detail": "Senator jointly signed letters seeking information and certification scrutiny; requested deadline14February2025. No subpoena, mandatory enforcement order or observed sanction.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "complete signed letters",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
          "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
          "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
      "source": "w30-class-adalytics",
      "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "provided research described as available before release",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-release"
      ],
      "summary": "Senate office announcement says senators received Adalytics research before public release. Underlying full technical report/methods were not inspected in this lane; no merits finding follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
        "source": "w30-class-adalytics",
        "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "label": "provided research described as available before release",
        "detail": "Senate office announcement says senators received Adalytics research before public release. Underlying full technical report/methods were not inspected in this lane; no merits finding follows.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "substantive reader99–123",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-release"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
      "source": "w30-class-cma",
      "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "claims advocacy contribution",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-cma-advocacy",
        "w30-class-s-senate-release"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA says its advocacy helped the inquiry. Senate records independently establish requests but do not credit CMA with drafting; no sole-cause claim.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
        "source": "w30-class-cma",
        "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "label": "claims advocacy contribution",
        "detail": "CMA says its advocacy helped the inquiry. Senate records independently establish requests but do not credit CMA with drafting; no sole-cause claim.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "CMA reader25–88; Senate99–123",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-cma-advocacy",
          "w30-class-s-senate-release"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-garcia-citation",
      "source": "w30-class-garcia-citation",
      "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "is expressly cited in TAG letter",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
      ],
      "summary": "Footnote7 cites an Arielle Garcia trial-update article. The underlying testimony/article was not inspected; citation does not establish letter authorship or adoption of all claims.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-garcia-citation",
        "source": "w30-class-garcia-citation",
        "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "label": "is expressly cited in TAG letter",
        "detail": "Footnote7 cites an Arielle Garcia trial-update article. The underlying testimony/article was not inspected; citation does not establish letter authorship or adoption of all claims.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "footnote7",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
      "source": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "target": "w30-class-dv",
      "label": "requests remediation, data-use and revenue answers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-dv"
      ],
      "summary": "Letter asks about blocking/remediation, advertiser notification, annual NCMEC-report use, authority reports and related revenue; answers requested by14February. Questions are not proof of underlying violations or completed compliance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
        "source": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "target": "w30-class-dv",
        "label": "requests remediation, data-use and revenue answers",
        "detail": "Letter asks about blocking/remediation, advertiser notification, annual NCMEC-report use, authority reports and related revenue; answers requested by14February. Questions are not proof of underlying violations or completed compliance.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "complete3-page letter",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-dv"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-senate-ncmec-citation",
      "source": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
      "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "label": "supplies specifically cited2021 notice-table reference",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
        "w30-class-s-ncmec2021"
      ],
      "summary": "DV letter cites the2021outbound-notification table. This is an explicit source reference, not proof DV selected that exact file or that every row denotes illegal domains.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-senate-ncmec-citation",
        "source": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
        "target": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "label": "supplies specifically cited2021 notice-table reference",
        "detail": "DV letter cites the2021outbound-notification table. This is an explicit source reference, not proof DV selected that exact file or that every row denotes illegal domains.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "letter footnotes; tablePDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec2021"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
      "source": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "target": "w30-class-mrc",
      "label": "requests review, audit and possible revocation explanations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-mrc"
      ],
      "summary": "Letter challenges MRC about certification, audits, fee policies and revocation. Its cited2018guidance was not freshly acquired; no accreditor breach or executed revocation inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
        "source": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "target": "w30-class-mrc",
        "label": "requests review, audit and possible revocation explanations",
        "detail": "Letter challenges MRC about certification, audits, fee policies and revocation. Its cited2018guidance was not freshly acquired; no accreditor breach or executed revocation inferred.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "complete4-page letter",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-mrc"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
      "source": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
      "target": "w30-class-tag",
      "label": "questions certification and whole-website monetization",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
      ],
      "summary": "TAG letter asks whether certified firms may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity while avoiding prohibited content itself, alongside review/revocation questions. This proposed broader responsibility is not a proven adopted ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
        "source": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
        "target": "w30-class-tag",
        "label": "questions certification and whole-website monetization",
        "detail": "TAG letter asks whether certified firms may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity while avoiding prohibited content itself, alongside review/revocation questions. This proposed broader responsibility is not a proven adopted ban.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF2; PDF3 question8",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-tag"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-adalytics",
      "label": "disputes interpretation and reports added safeguards",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-response"
      ],
      "summary": "February7 company response disputes technical conclusions, reports extra blocking/review and a P2P category under development. It is interested-party response, not independently audited test data; temporal overlap with letters does not isolate causation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-adalytics",
        "label": "disputes interpretation and reports added safeguards",
        "detail": "February7 company response disputes technical conclusions, reports extra blocking/review and a P2P category under development. It is interested-party response, not independently audited test data; temporal overlap with letters does not isolate causation.",
        "date": "2025-02-07 – 2025-02-07",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "original-derived1–33, especially26–31",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-tag-determination",
      "source": "w30-class-tag",
      "target": "w30-class-tag-response",
      "label": "reports no investigated BSC guideline violations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025report; release3February2026",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-tag-report",
        "w30-class-s-tag-release"
      ],
      "summary": "TAG reports that none of investigated companies violated BSC guidelines, explains accreditation limits and cites a23-page response. This is TAG's own determination, not independent exoneration; named findings and reply remain not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-tag-determination",
        "source": "w30-class-tag",
        "target": "w30-class-tag-response",
        "label": "reports no investigated BSC guideline violations",
        "detail": "TAG reports that none of investigated companies violated BSC guidelines, explains accreditation limits and cites a23-page response. This is TAG's own determination, not independent exoneration; named findings and reply remain not obtained.",
        "date": "2025report; release3February2026",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "actual visible PDF20–21;3February2026 release",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
            "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-tag-report",
          "w30-class-s-tag-release"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-tag-ncmec-training",
      "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "target": "w30-class-tag-threat-members",
      "label": "was reported to train threat-exchange members",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025report",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-tag-report"
      ],
      "summary": "TAG's visible report describes NCMEC training for threat-exchange members. No operational shared dataset, database access or training-content adoption is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-tag-ncmec-training",
        "source": "w28-access-ncmec",
        "target": "w30-class-tag-threat-members",
        "label": "was reported to train threat-exchange members",
        "detail": "TAG's visible report describes NCMEC training for threat-exchange members. No operational shared dataset, database access or training-content adoption is inferred.",
        "date": "2025report",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "actual visible PDF20–21",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-tag-report"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april",
      "source": "w30-class-dv",
      "target": "w30-class-adalytics",
      "label": "publishes technical and commercial rebuttal",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-rebuttal"
      ],
      "summary": "7April company statement challenges bot/billing/code and detection claims, including alleged misleading government representations. Merits and actual billable adjustments were not independently audited; this predates the14April letter.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april",
        "source": "w30-class-dv",
        "target": "w30-class-adalytics",
        "label": "publishes technical and commercial rebuttal",
        "detail": "7April company statement challenges bot/billing/code and detection claims, including alleged misleading government representations. Merits and actual billable adjustments were not independently audited; this predates the14April letter.",
        "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "reader2–77/95–97",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-rebuttal"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-bondi-representation",
      "source": "w30-class-bondi",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "label": "signed preservation letter as counsel",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-preservation-letter"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient-published letter names Bondi acting for DoubleVerify Holdings on Paul Hastings letterhead. No fee or ownership relation follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-bondi-representation",
        "source": "w30-class-bondi",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "label": "signed preservation letter as counsel",
        "detail": "Recipient-published letter names Bondi acting for DoubleVerify Holdings on Paul Hastings letterhead. No fee or ownership relation follows.",
        "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "fullPDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-preservation-letter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-firm-representation",
      "source": "w30-class-paul-hastings",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "label": "is named counsel in demand and pleading",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "April–May2025",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-preservation-letter",
        "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
      ],
      "summary": "Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-firm-representation",
        "source": "w30-class-paul-hastings",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "label": "is named counsel in demand and pleading",
        "detail": "Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination.",
        "date": "April–May2025",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "letterPDF1; complaintPDF32",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-preservation-letter",
          "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "target": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
      "label": "issued counsel demand under anticipated litigation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-preservation-letter"
      ],
      "summary": "Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "target": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
        "label": "issued counsel demand under anticipated litigation",
        "detail": "Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope.",
        "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "fullPDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-preservation-letter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient",
      "source": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "requests preservation and confirmation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-preservation-letter"
      ],
      "summary": "Addressed to Arielle Garcia care of CMA; asks confirmation by noonEDT16April. It demands neither immediate production, retraction nor cessation. Actual confirmation/compliance not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient",
        "source": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "requests preservation and confirmation",
        "detail": "Addressed to Arielle Garcia care of CMA; asks confirmation by noonEDT16April. It demands neither immediate production, retraction nor cessation. Actual confirmation/compliance not acquired.",
        "date": "2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "fullPDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-preservation-letter"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-cma-objection",
      "source": "w30-class-cma",
      "target": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
      "label": "publicly objects while asserting legal compliance",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-16 – 2025-04-16",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-cma-response"
      ],
      "summary": "16April statement says it will comply with legal obligations but views demand as overbroad and will continue work. This is a position, not completed preservation or judicial overbreadth finding; no measured chilling effect established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-cma-objection",
        "source": "w30-class-cma",
        "target": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
        "label": "publicly objects while asserting legal compliance",
        "detail": "16April statement says it will comply with legal obligations but views demand as overbroad and will continue work. This is a position, not completed preservation or judicial overbreadth finding; no measured chilling effect established.",
        "date": "2025-04-16 – 2025-04-16",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "reader18–36",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-cma-response"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
      "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
      ],
      "summary": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
        "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
        "detail": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
        "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-inc",
      "target": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
      "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
      ],
      "summary": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-inc",
        "target": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
        "label": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
        "detail": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.",
        "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
      "target": "w30-class-adalytics",
      "label": "seeks damages, retraction and corrective advertising",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
      ],
      "summary": "Pleading asks compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs/fees and corrective relief. These are requested, not granted; CMA is not its named defendant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
        "target": "w30-class-adalytics",
        "label": "seeks damages, retraction and corrective advertising",
        "detail": "Pleading asks compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs/fees and corrective relief. These are requested, not granted; CMA is not its named defendant.",
        "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF31 prayerA–E",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation",
      "source": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "alleges coordinated amplification",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraph68 alleges coordination with CMA in amplifying statements. This remains plaintiff allegation and does not establish a judicial finding, operational control or that CMA was sued in this complaint.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation",
        "source": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "alleges coordinated amplification",
        "detail": "Paragraph68 alleges coordination with CMA in amplifying statements. This remains plaintiff allegation and does not establish a judicial finding, operational control or that CMA was sued in this complaint.",
        "date": "2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "PDF23 paragraph68",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-complaint"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ford2022",
      "source": "w31-fa-ford",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "approved general support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Approval month2022-10; stated term2022-10 through2023-09; exact days unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-ford2022"
      ],
      "summary": "Ford reports USD200000 General Support, approvedOctober2022 for October2022–September2023. This is an approved award, not payment or support earmarked to a later2025 campaign. Financial details: value: 200,000; currency: USD; kind: approved grant; period: October2022–September2023 Payment status: unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ford2022",
        "source": "w31-fa-ford",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "approved general support",
        "detail": "Ford reports USD200000 General Support, approvedOctober2022 for October2022–September2023. This is an approved award, not payment or support earmarked to a later2025 campaign.",
        "date": "Approval month2022-10; stated term2022-10 through2023-09; exact days unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Grant144432 complete substantive record, reader124–160.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
            "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-ford2022"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 200,000; currency: USD; kind: approved grant; period: October2022–September2023"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
      "source": "w31-fa-democracy",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "reported paid general support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Calendar2023; individual payment date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-democracy2023"
      ],
      "summary": "The donor's2023 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD450000 is a reader/discovery candidate whose row alignment was not visually verified, so no precise amount is encoded. A separate future-payment entry is not a second payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
        "source": "w31-fa-democracy",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "reported paid general support",
        "detail": "The donor's2023 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD450000 is a reader/discovery candidate whose row alignment was not visually verified, so no precise amount is encoded. A separate future-payment entry is not a second payment.",
        "date": "Calendar2023; individual payment date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF20/printed17 paid schedule; PDF42/printed39 future schedule.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-democracy2023"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-democracy2024",
      "source": "w31-fa-democracy",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "reported paid general support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Calendar2024; individual payment date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-democracy2024"
      ],
      "summary": "The donor's2024 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD250000 is a reader/discovery candidate with unverified visual row alignment; this record carries no precise amount or exact payment date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-democracy2024",
        "source": "w31-fa-democracy",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "reported paid general support",
        "detail": "The donor's2024 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD250000 is a reader/discovery candidate with unverified visual row alignment; this record carries no precise amount or exact payment date.",
        "date": "Calendar2024; individual payment date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF17/printed18, PartXIV paid grants around CMA.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-democracy2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
      "source": "w31-fa-kr",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "reported a climate/election disinformation grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Inclusive stated grant term, not disbursement dates; granted in2023, exact approval day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-kr2023",
        "w31-fa-s-kr2023list"
      ],
      "summary": "Donor-authored2023 report lists DKK1991232, term1May2023–1May2025, to cut climate-change and election disinformation off at the source. Not a traced allocation to the February2025 child-safety letters. Financial details: value: 1,991,232; currency: DKK; kind: reported grant; period: 1May2023–1May2025 Payment status: unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
        "source": "w31-fa-kr",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "reported a climate/election disinformation grant",
        "detail": "Donor-authored2023 report lists DKK1991232, term1May2023–1May2025, to cut climate-change and election disinformation off at the source. Not a traced allocation to the February2025 child-safety letters.",
        "date": "Inclusive stated grant term, not disbursement dates; granted in2023, exact approval day unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Printed46/PDF24 double spread, visually checked grant row; current2023 list confirms term.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
            "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-kr2023",
          "w31-fa-s-kr2023list"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,991,232; currency: DKK; kind: reported grant; period: 1May2023–1May2025"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
      "source": "w31-fa-kr",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "listed a later grant term",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Stated grant term, not approval or payment dates.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-kr2025list"
      ],
      "summary": "KR's public2025 list records CMA, US,1April2025–1April2027. Amount, purpose and payment are not disclosed in this list; the2023 amount/purpose are not carried forward.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
        "source": "w31-fa-kr",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "listed a later grant term",
        "detail": "KR's public2025 list records CMA, US,1April2025–1April2027. Amount, purpose and payment are not disclosed in this list; the2023 amount/purpose are not carried forward.",
        "date": "Stated grant term, not approval or payment dates.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "CMA row and list footer; root visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-kr2025list"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
      "source": "w31-fa-krboard",
      "target": "w31-fa-kr",
      "label": "decides distribution, eligibility, scale and timing",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
      ],
      "summary": "Statutes assign distribution and award decisions to KR's board, permitting defined delegation to chairmanship/executive director. No namedCMA vote or intervention-specific approval right is disclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
        "source": "w31-fa-krboard",
        "target": "w31-fa-kr",
        "label": "decides distribution, eligibility, scale and timing",
        "detail": "Statutes assign distribution and award decisions to KR's board, permitting defined delegation to chairmanship/executive director. No namedCMA vote or intervention-specific approval right is disclosed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section5.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-krappointments",
      "source": "w31-fa-villum",
      "target": "w31-fa-krboard",
      "label": "may appoint up to two directors",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
      ],
      "summary": "VILLUM FONDEN may appoint up to two of a five-to-seven-person board; the remaining directors are board-elected. This is an appointment right, not evidence of a coordinated bloc or individual grant veto.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-krappointments",
        "source": "w31-fa-villum",
        "target": "w31-fa-krboard",
        "label": "may appoint up to two directors",
        "detail": "VILLUM FONDEN may appoint up to two of a five-to-seven-person board; the remaining directors are board-elected. This is an appointment right, not evidence of a coordinated bloc or individual grant veto.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section7.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-krelections",
      "source": "w31-fa-krboard",
      "target": "w31-fa-krboard",
      "label": "elects remaining directors under a dissent limit",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
      ],
      "summary": "Election of remaining directors requires a majority with no more than one dissent. Two eligible dissenting votes can block that election; ordinary decisions use a simple majority and chair casting vote. No actual vote is reconstructed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-krelections",
        "source": "w31-fa-krboard",
        "target": "w31-fa-krboard",
        "label": "elects remaining directors under a dissent limit",
        "detail": "Election of remaining directors requires a majority with no more than one dissent. Two eligible dissenting votes can block that election; ordinary decisions use a simple majority and chair casting vote. No actual vote is reconstructed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section7 election and ordinary-vote clauses.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-krsigning",
      "source": "w31-fa-krsign",
      "target": "w31-fa-kr",
      "label": "can bind the foundation under joint-signature rules",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
      ],
      "summary": "Section8 identifies joint signatures or delegated authority for binding KR. No executed CMA award, editorial approval, reporting schedule or termination clause was acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-krsigning",
        "source": "w31-fa-krsign",
        "target": "w31-fa-kr",
        "label": "can bind the foundation under joint-signature rules",
        "detail": "Section8 identifies joint signatures or delegated authority for binding KR. No executed CMA award, editorial approval, reporting schedule or termination clause was acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Section8.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-krstatutes"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-mix2024",
      "source": "w30-class-cma",
      "target": "w31-fa-mix2024",
      "label": "reported a funding-source chart",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report period2024; publication pathFebruary2025 is not the accounting period.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA's2024 graphic labels major donors59, foundations30 and individuals11. These chart values have no explicit percent sign or dollar denominator; 490 recurring donors and the separate Checkmates60/one-time40 chart are distinct measures.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-mix2024",
        "source": "w30-class-cma",
        "target": "w31-fa-mix2024",
        "label": "reported a funding-source chart",
        "detail": "CMA's2024 graphic labels major donors59, foundations30 and individuals11. These chart values have no explicit percent sign or dollar denominator; 490 recurring donors and the separate Checkmates60/one-time40 chart are distinct measures.",
        "date": "Report period2024; publication pathFebruary2025 is not the accounting period.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF24, root visual and full report text.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-mix2025",
      "source": "w30-class-cma",
      "target": "w31-fa-mix2025",
      "label": "reported foundation grants as 82.8 percent",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report period2025; URL path containsApril2026, not an independently established publication date.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cma2025"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA's2025 chart explicitly reports foundation grants82.8%, major donors12.3% and individuals4.9%, with four new institutional donors and three multiyear renewals. No absolute revenue or causal explanation for the shift is supplied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-mix2025",
        "source": "w30-class-cma",
        "target": "w31-fa-mix2025",
        "label": "reported foundation grants as 82.8 percent",
        "detail": "CMA's2025 chart explicitly reports foundation grants82.8%, major donors12.3% and individuals4.9%, with four new institutional donors and three multiyear renewals. No absolute revenue or causal explanation for the shift is supplied.",
        "date": "Report period2025; URL path containsApril2026, not an independently established publication date.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF35 visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cma2025"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-boardroster",
      "source": "w30-class-cma",
      "target": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
      "label": "published a historical board roster",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024 annual-report context; precise tenure intervals unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
      ],
      "summary": "The2024 annual report names a board and co-chairs; it supplies no donor appointment/veto mechanism or current-office guarantee.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-boardroster",
        "source": "w30-class-cma",
        "target": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
        "label": "published a historical board roster",
        "detail": "The2024 annual report names a board and co-chairs; it supplies no donor appointment/veto mechanism or current-office guarantee.",
        "date": "2024 annual-report context; precise tenure intervals unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF25 board/team page.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-atkincochair",
      "source": "w31-fa-atkin",
      "target": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
      "label": "was listed as co-chair",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-atkincochair",
        "source": "w31-fa-atkin",
        "target": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
        "label": "was listed as co-chair",
        "detail": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
        "date": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "PDF25 board roster.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-jammicochair",
      "source": "w31-fa-jammi",
      "target": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
      "label": "was listed as co-chair",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-jammicochair",
        "source": "w31-fa-jammi",
        "target": "w31-fa-cmaboard2024",
        "label": "was listed as co-chair",
        "detail": "CMA lists its founder as a2024 board co-chair. This is a dated reported role, not a donor-conferred right or an inferred current tenure.",
        "date": "2024 annual report; exact start/end unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "PDF25 board roster.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-oakcma",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w30-class-cma",
      "label": "reported a three-year core grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 report; exact approval/start/end dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-5046aaa630e7"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak's2025 report lists USD600000 over three years for CMA core support promoting transparency and fairness in digital advertising. Award is not annual expenditure, cash payment, exact grant-start date, or an earmark to the Ofcom response. Oak contracting group entity is unspecified. Financial details: value: 600,000; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact term dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Printed grantee is Check My Ads; row does not supply EIN or contracting Oak entity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-oakcma",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w30-class-cma",
        "label": "reported a three-year core grant",
        "detail": "Oak's2025 report lists USD600000 over three years for CMA core support promoting transparency and fairness in digital advertising. Award is not annual expenditure, cash payment, exact grant-start date, or an earmark to the Ofcom response. Oak contracting group entity is unspecified.",
        "date": "2025 report; exact approval/start/end dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF24, original and root visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5046aaa630e7"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 600,000; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact term dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Printed grantee is Check My Ads; row does not supply EIN or contracting Oak entity."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
      "source": "w30-class-cma",
      "target": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "label": "provided a consultation response",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 consultation; exact submission day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom hosts CMA's31-page additional-safety response. The11December2025 listing date is not an independently established submission date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
        "source": "w30-class-cma",
        "target": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "label": "provided a consultation response",
        "detail": "Ofcom hosts CMA's31-page additional-safety response. The11December2025 listing date is not an independently established submission date.",
        "date": "2025 consultation; exact submission day unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Regulator-hosted response, Q1–60 and appendix.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
      "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "submitted proposals for additional safety measures",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA asked Ofcom to address monetization incentives, verification and sanctions. Receipt/publication does not establish adoption of each recommendation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
        "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "submitted proposals for additional safety measures",
        "detail": "CMA asked Ofcom to address monetization incentives, verification and sanctions. Receipt/publication does not establish adoption of each recommendation.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Q6,31,33,35–39,49–52,56.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-checks",
      "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "target": "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
      "label": "requested verification of creators and advertisers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "KYC/KYBC proposals cover creators and advertisers, payment/location signals and repeat violators. No universal viewer-ID rule, prescribed identity document or technical identity database is specified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-checks",
        "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "target": "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
        "label": "requested verification of creators and advertisers",
        "detail": "KYC/KYBC proposals cover creators and advertisers, payment/location signals and repeat violators. No universal viewer-ID rule, prescribed identity document or technical identity database is specified.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Q6 PDF2–3; Q33 PDF10; Q56 PDF14–15.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-clearance",
      "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "target": "w31-fa-premonetization",
      "label": "requested withholding monetization pending platform assessment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA would require a monetization decision where risk indicators suggest illegal content, with clearance by provider systems/manual review; a court ruling is not the proposed trigger.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-clearance",
        "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "target": "w31-fa-premonetization",
        "label": "requested withholding monetization pending platform assessment",
        "detail": "CMA would require a monetization decision where risk indicators suggest illegal content, with clearance by provider systems/manual review; a court ruling is not the proposed trigger.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Q31 PDF9; Q35 PDF10.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
      "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "target": "w31-fa-sanctions",
      "label": "requested return bans, repeat-violator sanctions and clawbacks",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA requests return prevention for specified adultCSAM offenders, permanent bans of repeat illegal monetizers and advertiser clawbacks. Account access and revenue sanctions are distinct; implementation unverified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
        "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "target": "w31-fa-sanctions",
        "label": "requested return bans, repeat-violator sanctions and clawbacks",
        "detail": "CMA requests return prevention for specified adultCSAM offenders, permanent bans of repeat illegal monetizers and advertiser clawbacks. Account access and revenue sanctions are distinct; implementation unverified.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Q36 PDF10; Q39 PDF11.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
      "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "target": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
      "label": "requested crisis monetization controls and conditional refunds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA proposed crisis revenue information, monetization changes and refunds where possible, not a guarantee of reimbursement in every case.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
        "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "target": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
        "label": "requested crisis monetization controls and conditional refunds",
        "detail": "CMA proposed crisis revenue information, monetization changes and refunds where possible, not a guarantee of reimbursement in every case.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Q49–52 PDF12–14.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-adincident",
      "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "target": "w31-fa-adincident",
      "label": "requested advertising incident reporting without a minimum threshold",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
      ],
      "summary": "CMA asked for reporting to Ofcom/advertisers and associated refunds, using harmful/unsafe-ad terminology as well as illegality. It did not establish the reported incidents independently.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-adincident",
        "source": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "target": "w31-fa-adincident",
        "label": "requested advertising incident reporting without a minimum threshold",
        "detail": "CMA asked for reporting to Ofcom/advertisers and associated refunds, using harmful/unsafe-ad terminology as well as illegality. It did not establish the reported incidents independently.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Q11–12 PDF4–6.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
      "label": "declined to recommend specific monetization practices",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom explicitly records CMA's revenue/refund request and declines to recommend specific monetization practices for the crisis protocol. Providers retain proportionate advertising-integrity choices; this does not decide CMA's other proposals.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
        "label": "declined to recommend specific monetization practices",
        "detail": "Ofcom explicitly records CMA's revenue/refund request and declines to recommend specific monetization practices for the crisis protocol. Providers retain proportionate advertising-integrity choices; this does not decide CMA's other proposals.",
        "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "A1.147–148 PDF47, fn113 citing CMAresponsep14.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
      "source": "w31-fa-fullfact",
      "target": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "label": "published a dated consultation response",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Full Fact's response is dated17October2025 on PDF20 and later listed11December. The response cannot establish its participation in the earlier August meeting.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
        "source": "w31-fa-fullfact",
        "target": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "label": "published a dated consultation response",
        "detail": "Full Fact's response is dated17October2025 on PDF20 and later listed11December. The response cannot establish its participation in the earlier August meeting.",
        "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF20 document date; paragraphs1–90.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
      "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "made consultation requests",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Full Fact requested broader scope, coordination, oversight and access, with expression and proportionality arguments. Publication and citation are not a grant of those powers.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
        "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "made consultation requests",
        "detail": "Full Fact requested broader scope, coordination, oversight and access, with expression and proportionality arguments. Publication and citation are not a grant of those powers.",
        "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs12–15,29–44,52–54,62–79.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
      "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "target": "w31-fa-ffscope",
      "label": "requested broader crisis and legislative scope",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Paragraph76 aligns scope with s175 health/national-security language; paragraphs77–79 seek evidence/severity/transparent criteria. Separate systemic-misinformation legislative review is acknowledged as beyond this consultation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
        "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "target": "w31-fa-ffscope",
        "label": "requested broader crisis and legislative scope",
        "detail": "Paragraph76 aligns scope with s175 health/national-security language; paragraphs77–79 seek evidence/severity/transparent criteria. Separate systemic-misinformation legislative review is acknowledged as beyond this consultation.",
        "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs12–15 PDF4;76–79 PDF17–18.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
      "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "target": "w31-fa-ffaccess",
      "label": "requested meaningful access for accredited fact-checkers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Full Fact explicitly recognizes that Ofcom cannot mandate platform fact-checker partnerships, then seeks meaningful data access and consequences for failure. A requested institutional benefit is not an actual entitlement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
        "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "target": "w31-fa-ffaccess",
        "label": "requested meaningful access for accredited fact-checkers",
        "detail": "Full Fact explicitly recognizes that Ofcom cannot mandate platform fact-checker partnerships, then seeks meaningful data access and consequences for failure. A requested institutional benefit is not an actual entitlement.",
        "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs52–54 PDF12.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
      "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "target": "w31-fa-ffoversight",
      "label": "requested coordination and stronger accountability",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Requests include Ofcom coordination, notifications, evidence logs, oversight, public summaries and regular submission of analyses. Requested safeguards do not establish an executed return/appeal process.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
        "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "target": "w31-fa-ffoversight",
        "label": "requested coordination and stronger accountability",
        "detail": "Requests include Ofcom coordination, notifications, evidence logs, oversight, public summaries and regular submission of analyses. Requested safeguards do not establish an executed return/appeal process.",
        "date": "2025-10-17 – 2025-10-17",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs29–34 PDF7–8;38–44 PDF9–10;62–72 PDF14–16.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
      "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "target": "w31-fa-noticechange",
      "label": "was cited as an input to a recommendation amendment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and earlier DSIT-meeting questions. This establishes regulator-attributed contribution, not exclusive authorship or verbatim adoption of Full Fact's scope language.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
        "source": "w31-fa-ffsub",
        "target": "w31-fa-noticechange",
        "label": "was cited as an input to a recommendation amendment",
        "detail": "Ofcom says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and earlier DSIT-meeting questions. This establishes regulator-attributed contribution, not exclusive authorship or verbatim adoption of Full Fact's scope language.",
        "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Statement3.46–47 PDF17, fn29; responseparagraph76 PDF17.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis",
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
      "source": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
      "target": "w31-fa-noticechange",
      "label": "was cited as another input to the amendment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Meeting4August2025; attribution in June2026 statement.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom cites questions at a4August2025 meeting with DSIT alongside Full Fact's later response. No minute supplies the question text, attendees or allocated drafting role.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
        "source": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
        "target": "w31-fa-noticechange",
        "label": "was cited as another input to the amendment",
        "detail": "Ofcom cites questions at a4August2025 meeting with DSIT alongside Full Fact's later response. No minute supplies the question text, attendees or allocated drafting role.",
        "date": "Meeting4August2025; attribution in June2026 statement.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Statement3.46–47 fn29.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
      "label": "reported a meeting with DSIT",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "The regulator's published footnote identifies a4August2025 meeting; that record does not establish Full Fact attendance or initiation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
        "label": "reported a meeting with DSIT",
        "detail": "The regulator's published footnote identifies a4August2025 meeting; that record does not establish Full Fact attendance or initiation.",
        "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Footnote29, PDF17.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "label": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
        "w31-fa-s-laying"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "label": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
        "detail": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred.",
        "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Statement3 and annex response; children draft; HCWS124.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis",
          "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
          "w31-fa-s-laying"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
      "source": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "target": "w31-fa-providers",
      "label": "recommends criteria-based crisis processes",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "Providers use seriousUK-public-safety and relevant illegal/child-harm content indicators to determine a crisis, including linked overseas/local events. The framework is not a free-standing general misinformation intervention power.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
        "source": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "target": "w31-fa-providers",
        "label": "recommends criteria-based crisis processes",
        "detail": "Providers use seriousUK-public-safety and relevant illegal/child-harm content indicators to determine a crisis, including linked overseas/local events. The framework is not a free-standing general misinformation intervention power.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "3.18–23 PDF10–12;3.45 PDF16.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-inputs",
      "source": "w31-fa-indicators",
      "target": "w31-fa-providers",
      "label": "may inform a provider determination",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "External and internal signals can inform the provider, including NGOs without trusted-flagger status. No named NGO is selected, and no indicator automatically activates a crisis.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-inputs",
        "source": "w31-fa-indicators",
        "target": "w31-fa-providers",
        "label": "may inform a provider determination",
        "detail": "External and internal signals can inform the provider, including NGOs without trusted-flagger status. No named NGO is selected, and no indicator automatically activates a crisis.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "3.18–23.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
      "source": "w31-fa-providers",
      "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "label": "determines activation using relevant criteria",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "The provider determines a crisis and chooses systems; action is as soon as reasonably practicable. A ministerial public statement notice is considered alongside indicators, not an automatic switch.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
        "source": "w31-fa-providers",
        "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "label": "determines activation using relevant criteria",
        "detail": "The provider determines a crisis and chooses systems; action is as soon as reasonably practicable. A ministerial public statement notice is considered alongside indicators, not an automatic switch.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "3.20,3.23,3.26.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
      "source": "w31-fa-providers",
      "target": "w31-fa-team",
      "label": "assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "The recommendation places operational coordination inside a provider-selected senior cross-functional team; no public appointment of a named NGO or government officer into it is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
        "source": "w31-fa-providers",
        "target": "w31-fa-team",
        "label": "assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team",
        "detail": "The recommendation places operational coordination inside a provider-selected senior cross-functional team; no public appointment of a named NGO or government officer into it is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "3.20 and3.26.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
      "source": "w31-fa-noticechange",
      "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "label": "added consideration of a ministerial-notice indicator",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom's attributed amendment requires considering the notice alongside other indicators. It does not transfer the provider's crisis determination wholesale to Full Fact, DSIT or the Secretary.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
        "source": "w31-fa-noticechange",
        "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "label": "added consideration of a ministerial-notice indicator",
        "detail": "Ofcom's attributed amendment requires considering the notice alongside other indicators. It does not transfer the provider's crisis determination wholesale to Full Fact, DSIT or the Secretary.",
        "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "3.11,3.23,3.46–47.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
      "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "may direct media-literacy priorities for a specified period",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "On reasonable grounds for the specified public-health/safety or national-security threat, enacted s175(2) permits direction of media-literacy priorities. This is separate from content removal or the public-statement route.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
        "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "may direct media-literacy priorities for a specified period",
        "detail": "On reasonable grounds for the specified public-health/safety or national-security threat, enacted s175(2) permits direction of media-literacy priorities. This is separate from content removal or the public-statement route.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "EnactedPDF169/printed155, s175(1)–(2),(9).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
      "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "may require public statement notices",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "Enacted s175(1),(3) permits direction to Ofcom to issue a notice to a specified provider or providers generally. It compels a public-accounting route, not on this text a direction to remove any specified lawful post.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
        "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "may require public statement notices",
        "detail": "Enacted s175(1),(3) permits direction to Ofcom to issue a notice to a specified provider or providers generally. It compels a public-accounting route, not on this text a direction to remove any specified lawful post.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "EnactedPDF169, s175(1),(3).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-notice",
      "label": "must issue a notice under a qualifying direction",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "A direction under s175(3) requires Ofcom to give a public statement notice. No particular direction, notice or recipient was acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-notice",
        "label": "must issue a notice under a qualifying direction",
        "detail": "A direction under s175(3) requires Ofcom to give a public statement notice. No particular direction, notice or recipient was acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "s175(3)–(4).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
      "source": "w31-fa-notice",
      "target": "w31-fa-providers",
      "label": "can require a public statement by a specified date",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "A public statement notice requires the provider to describe steps taken in response to the threat by the specified date; publication is not itself a takedown command.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
        "source": "w31-fa-notice",
        "target": "w31-fa-providers",
        "label": "can require a public statement by a specified date",
        "detail": "A public statement notice requires the provider to describe steps taken in response to the threat by the specified date; publication is not itself a takedown command.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "s175(4).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-information",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-providers",
      "label": "may require threat-response information",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "Under s175(5), Ofcom may use the public statement notice or a subsequent notice to require information needed to respond to the threat. Actual information demanded and ensuing provider behavior remain unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-information",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-providers",
        "label": "may require threat-response information",
        "detail": "Under s175(5), Ofcom may use the public statement notice or a subsequent notice to require information needed to respond to the threat. Actual information demanded and ensuing provider behavior remain unknown.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "s175(5).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
      "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
      "target": "w31-fa-notice",
      "label": "must publish reasons for health/safety-ground directions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "Section175(6) requires publication of reasons for a direction on public-health/safety grounds. The same subsection does not impose that duty for the national-security ground.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
        "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
        "target": "w31-fa-notice",
        "label": "must publish reasons for health/safety-ground directions",
        "detail": "Section175(6) requires publication of reasons for a direction on public-health/safety grounds. The same subsection does not impose that duty for the national-security ground.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF170/printed156,s175(6).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke",
      "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "may vary or revoke the direction",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
      ],
      "summary": "Section175(7) permits variation/revocation; under(8) Ofcom may consequentially vary/revoke a public statement notice. No revocation or automatic restoration of content is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke",
        "source": "w31-fa-secretary",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "may vary or revoke the direction",
        "detail": "Section175(7) permits variation/revocation; under(8) Ofcom may consequentially vary/revoke a public statement notice. No revocation or automatic restoration of content is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "s175(7)–(8).",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
      "source": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "target": "w31-fa-lechannel",
      "label": "recommends a dedicated channel for large services",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "w31-fa-s-childdraft"
      ],
      "summary": "Large in-scope services should provide a dedicated law-enforcement channel after their own crisis determination. Smaller high-risk protocol scope does not automatically carry this channel requirement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
        "source": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "target": "w31-fa-lechannel",
        "label": "recommends a dedicated channel for large services",
        "detail": "Large in-scope services should provide a dedicated law-enforcement channel after their own crisis determination. Smaller high-risk protocol scope does not automatically carry this channel requirement.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "3.27–29 PDF13; draftC12.3.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis",
          "w31-fa-s-childdraft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
      "source": "w31-fa-providers",
      "target": "w31-fa-lechannel",
      "label": "would operate a conditional incoming-information channel",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "The channel is for fast crisis information into large services. Existing legal processes for routine data requests remain; Ofcom disclaims general power here to compel disclosure to police.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
        "source": "w31-fa-providers",
        "target": "w31-fa-lechannel",
        "label": "would operate a conditional incoming-information channel",
        "detail": "The channel is for fast crisis information into large services. Existing legal processes for routine data requests remain; Ofcom disclaims general power here to compel disclosure to police.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "A1.61–64 PDF34–35.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "label": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "label": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
        "detail": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved.",
        "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "A1.48–59 PDF33–34, fn71/72/74 naming Full Fact among relevant respondents; FullFact52–54. Class-level measure disposition, not rejection of all data-access proposals.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis",
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "label": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "label": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
        "detail": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected.",
        "date": "2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "A1.40–59 PDF31–34.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis",
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords",
      "source": "w31-fa-providers",
      "target": "w31-fa-analysis",
      "label": "would retain post-crisis analysis and key records",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "The statement recommends ending the protocol when criteria end or at90days, sooner, then analysis/records. Continuing risks shift to ordinary operations; this is not a90-day restoration promise.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords",
        "source": "w31-fa-providers",
        "target": "w31-fa-analysis",
        "label": "would retain post-crisis analysis and key records",
        "detail": "The statement recommends ending the protocol when criteria end or at90days, sooner, then analysis/records. Continuing risks shift to ordinary operations; this is not a90-day restoration promise.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "3.30–34 PDF13–14.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-analysis",
      "label": "may seek records for supervision",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "Providers retain records and Ofcom may seek them or ask about activation; no universal routine public/submitted ledger was adopted. No particular suppressed record or request is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-analysis",
        "label": "may seek records for supervision",
        "detail": "Providers retain records and Ofcom may seek them or ask about activation; no universal routine public/submitted ledger was adopted. No particular suppressed record or request is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "A1.40–47 PDF31–32.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime",
      "source": "w31-fa-childdraft",
      "target": "w31-fa-analysis",
      "label": "sets analysis timing at crisis end or90days if earlier",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
        "w31-fa-s-crisis"
      ],
      "summary": "DraftC11.7 expressly sets analysis/improvement timing. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-protocol-at90days sentence; neither guarantees restoration of removals.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime",
        "source": "w31-fa-childdraft",
        "target": "w31-fa-analysis",
        "label": "sets analysis timing at crisis end or90days if earlier",
        "detail": "DraftC11.7 expressly sets analysis/improvement timing. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-protocol-at90days sentence; neither guarantees restoration of removals.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "DraftC11.7; statement3.30–34.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-retainappeals",
      "source": "w31-fa-protocol",
      "target": "w31-fa-safeguards",
      "label": "retains existing appeal, expression and privacy safeguards",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "w31-fa-s-childdraft"
      ],
      "summary": "Existing moderation/reporting/appeal, privacy and expression protections remain; no free-standing universal crisis appeal is created. Accuracy safeguards coexist with acknowledged possible false positives.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-retainappeals",
        "source": "w31-fa-protocol",
        "target": "w31-fa-safeguards",
        "label": "retains existing appeal, expression and privacy safeguards",
        "detail": "Existing moderation/reporting/appeal, privacy and expression protections remain; no free-standing universal crisis appeal is created. Accuracy safeguards coexist with acknowledged possible false positives.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "A1.127–138 PDF44–45;3.65–67 PDF19–20;draftC11.8.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis",
          "w31-fa-s-childdraft"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-laidchild",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-childdraft",
      "label": "submitted crisis code amendments for parliamentary process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Submitted2026-06-12; laid2026-06-18; later crisis commencement unresolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
        "w31-fa-s-laying"
      ],
      "summary": "The draft was submitted12June and laid18June2026; HCWS124 confirms laying and conditional40-day scrutiny then21days after issue. Blanks/brackets are not completed issue or commencement, and40days is not necessarily calendar days.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-laidchild",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-childdraft",
        "label": "submitted crisis code amendments for parliamentary process",
        "detail": "The draft was submitted12June and laid18June2026; HCWS124 confirms laying and conditional40-day scrutiny then21days after issue. Blanks/brackets are not completed issue or commencement, and40days is not necessarily calendar days.",
        "date": "Submitted2026-06-12; laid2026-06-18; later crisis commencement unresolved.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Draftpreamble1.1–1.6;HCWS124 fulltext.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
          "w31-fa-s-laying"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-cmasub",
      "label": "forecast remaining additional-measures decisions for autumn2026",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Roadmapupdated2026-07-28;indexupdated2026-09-09.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-roadmap",
        "w31-fa-s-statusindex"
      ],
      "summary": "The current scoped roadmap forecasts remaining decisions, while the crisis decision is already published. Neither the forecast nor the September9 issued-code index resolves all CMA proposals or crisis commencement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-cmasub",
        "label": "forecast remaining additional-measures decisions for autumn2026",
        "detail": "The current scoped roadmap forecasts remaining decisions, while the crisis decision is already published. Neither the forecast nor the September9 issued-code index resolves all CMA proposals or crisis commencement.",
        "date": "Roadmapupdated2026-07-28;indexupdated2026-09-09.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Roadmapreader200–202;regulatoryindex129–163.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-roadmap",
          "w31-fa-s-statusindex"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-planningreported",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-planning",
      "label": "confirmed an initial planning document and chronology",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Workbegan2024-10-23;confirmed2026-06-19.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-planningfoi"
      ],
      "summary": "FOI02210914 says work began23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. This is agency confirmation, not acquisition of those letters or the plan contents.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-planningreported",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-planning",
        "label": "confirmed an initial planning document and chronology",
        "detail": "FOI02210914 says work began23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. This is agency confirmation, not acquisition of those letters or the plan contents.",
        "date": "Workbegan2024-10-23;confirmed2026-06-19.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FOIPDF2; all4pages reader.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-planningfoi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-approvalreported",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-approval",
      "label": "reported a final approval window",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-05-21 through2026-05-26; exact act/day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-planningfoi"
      ],
      "summary": "The same FOI response identifies21–26May2026 as final approval. It does not supply a signed approval, approver identity or veto conditions. Its separate no-either/or-choice answer does not mean no approval brief exists.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-approvalreported",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-approval",
        "label": "reported a final approval window",
        "detail": "The same FOI response identifies21–26May2026 as final approval. It does not supply a signed approval, approver identity or veto conditions. Its separate no-either/or-choice answer does not mean no approval brief exists.",
        "date": "2026-05-21 through2026-05-26; exact act/day unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FOIPDF2 and question3 response.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-planningfoi"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-nciidate",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w31-fa-nciimeasure",
      "label": "announced a separate30September2026 NCII measure",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-nciinews",
        "w31-fa-s-nciistatus"
      ],
      "summary": "September9 official news/enforcement sources identify30September for NCII hash-matching. That date is not imported into the crisis protocol or unrelated CMA verification proposals. No named service implementation established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-nciidate",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w31-fa-nciimeasure",
        "label": "announced a separate30September2026 NCII measure",
        "detail": "September9 official news/enforcement sources identify30September for NCII hash-matching. That date is not imported into the crisis protocol or unrelated CMA verification proposals. No named service implementation established.",
        "date": "2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "News131–155;enforcement155.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-nciinews",
          "w31-fa-s-nciistatus"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
      "label": "recommended StopNCII as a suitable option",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-nciinews"
      ],
      "summary": "The NCII news recommends StopNCII while allowing equally effective alternatives; it does not require purchasing a sole supplier or establish terms of access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend",
        "source": "ofcom",
        "target": "w28-access-stopncii",
        "label": "recommended StopNCII as a suitable option",
        "detail": "The NCII news recommends StopNCII while allowing equally effective alternatives; it does not require purchasing a sole supplier or establish terms of access.",
        "date": "2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Newsfull substantivebody131–155.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-nciinews"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-swgflexpertise",
      "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "was described as providing expertise through a partnership",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "September9,2026 announcement; actual partnership term unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-nciinews"
      ],
      "summary": "Ofcom's NCII news describes SWGfL expertise/partnership. Payment, selection, contracting and approval terms were not acquired; this is not authority over Ofcom's code decisions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-swgflexpertise",
        "source": "w28-access-swgfl",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "was described as providing expertise through a partnership",
        "detail": "Ofcom's NCII news describes SWGfL expertise/partnership. Payment, selection, contracting and approval terms were not acquired; this is not authority over Ofcom's code decisions.",
        "date": "September9,2026 announcement; actual partnership term unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "News131–155.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-nciinews"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w31-fa-statewatch",
      "label": "reported a three-year information and analysis grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 report; exact approval/term dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-5046aaa630e7"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak2025 lists USD303622 over three years for Statewatch news/information/analysis on EU justice and home-affairs spending. The row does not label this core support. No exact term, payment or funding of its earlier2023 stance is established. Financial details: value: 303,622; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Exact contracting Oak entity and legal recipient identifiers not supplied by row.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w31-fa-statewatch",
        "label": "reported a three-year information and analysis grant",
        "detail": "Oak2025 lists USD303622 over three years for Statewatch news/information/analysis on EU justice and home-affairs spending. The row does not label this core support. No exact term, payment or funding of its earlier2023 stance is established.",
        "date": "2025 report; exact approval/term dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF25 original/rootvisual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5046aaa630e7"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 303,622; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Exact contracting Oak entity and legal recipient identifiers not supplied by row."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-oakdff",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w31-fa-dff",
      "label": "reported three-year core support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 report; exact approval/term dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-5046aaa630e7"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak2025 lists USD631579 over three years of DFF core support for digital rights in Europe. No traced earmark to Liberty, specific case-payment or authority over selection is established. Financial details: value: 631,579; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Contracting Oak group entity and precise recipient legal identifier not supplied by row.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-oakdff",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w31-fa-dff",
        "label": "reported three-year core support",
        "detail": "Oak2025 lists USD631579 over three years of DFF core support for digital rights in Europe. No traced earmark to Liberty, specific case-payment or authority over selection is established.",
        "date": "2025 report; exact approval/term dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF25 original/rootvisual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5046aaa630e7"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 631,579; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Contracting Oak group entity and precise recipient legal identifier not supplied by row."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-oakstrategy",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w31-fa-ihr",
      "label": "publishes a human-rights funding strategy",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated webpage read2026-09-09.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-oakihr"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak's current programme strategy combines media pluralism, reliable information and an open/accountable digital environment. Strategy is not a specific grant agreement, common political position or instruction to each recipient.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-oakstrategy",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w31-fa-ihr",
        "label": "publishes a human-rights funding strategy",
        "detail": "Oak's current programme strategy combines media pluralism, reliable information and an open/accountable digital environment. Strategy is not a specific grant agreement, common political position or instruction to each recipient.",
        "date": "Undated webpage read2026-09-09.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Full substantive IHRprogramme section.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-oakihr"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse",
      "source": "w31-fa-statewatch",
      "target": "w31-fa-swcsa",
      "label": "published and endorsed a proposal objection",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-swcsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Statewatch identifies itself among signatories to the EDRi-coordinated statement published13September2023. Claims about scanning, identity checks and rights are the statement's position, not independently verified law.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse",
        "source": "w31-fa-statewatch",
        "target": "w31-fa-swcsa",
        "label": "published and endorsed a proposal objection",
        "detail": "Statewatch identifies itself among signatories to the EDRi-coordinated statement published13September2023. Claims about scanning, identity checks and rights are the statement's position, not independently verified law.",
        "date": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Substantive statement and relevant signatory list.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-swcsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition",
      "source": "w31-fa-swcsa",
      "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
      "label": "opposed agreement without stronger rights/security safeguards",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-swcsa",
        "src-12639f108d96"
      ],
      "summary": "The2023 statement objects to EUCSA proposal provisions on broad scanning and potential identity requirements. Existing WeProtect Secretariat support concerns an undated earlier record with2022 membership figures; comparison is issue orientation across dates/drafts, not a common final vote.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition",
        "source": "w31-fa-swcsa",
        "target": "eu-csa-proposal",
        "label": "opposed agreement without stronger rights/security safeguards",
        "detail": "The2023 statement objects to EUCSA proposal provisions on broad scanning and potential identity requirements. Existing WeProtect Secretariat support concerns an undated earlier record with2022 membership figures; comparison is issue orientation across dates/drafts, not a common final vote.",
        "date": "2023-09-13 – 2023-09-13",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Statewatchstatement13September2023;WeProtectPDF4 attribution andpp2–4 safeguards.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
            "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-swcsa",
          "src-12639f108d96"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-swlettersign",
      "source": "w31-fa-statewatch",
      "target": "w31-fa-swletter",
      "label": "was a signatory to a published safeguards letter",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-swletter",
        "w31-fa-s-swletterpage"
      ],
      "summary": "Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-swlettersign",
        "source": "w31-fa-statewatch",
        "target": "w31-fa-swletter",
        "label": "was a signatory to a published safeguards letter",
        "detail": "Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence.",
        "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF5 signatory visual; publisherdatedarticle.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-swletter",
          "w31-fa-s-swletterpage"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-swrequest",
      "source": "w31-fa-swletter",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "requested clarification, transparency and conditional remedies",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-swletter",
        "w31-fa-s-swletterpage"
      ],
      "summary": "The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-swrequest",
        "source": "w31-fa-swletter",
        "target": "ofcom",
        "label": "requested clarification, transparency and conditional remedies",
        "detail": "The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established.",
        "date": "2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Full5-page letter; relevant requests inbody.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-swletter",
          "w31-fa-s-swletterpage"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-dffround",
      "source": "w31-fa-dff",
      "target": "w31-fa-dffround",
      "label": "reported16 grants approved in June2026",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "ApprovalJune2026, exact day unknown; announced2026-08-18.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-dffround"
      ],
      "summary": "The18August2026 announcement reports a June round of16grants totaling EUR500000. This aggregate is not a payment, Liberty's allocation or an independently audited budget. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported aggregate approved grants; period: June2026 round Payment status: unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-dffround",
        "source": "w31-fa-dff",
        "target": "w31-fa-dffround",
        "label": "reported16 grants approved in June2026",
        "detail": "The18August2026 announcement reports a June round of16grants totaling EUR500000. This aggregate is not a payment, Liberty's allocation or an independently audited budget.",
        "date": "ApprovalJune2026, exact day unknown; announced2026-08-18.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Articledate andJuneapproval/roundparagraphs, reader9–18.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-dffround"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 500,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported aggregate approved grants; period: June2026 round"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-peerselection",
      "source": "w31-fa-peergroup",
      "target": "w31-fa-dffround",
      "label": "was credited with review and grant selection",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2026 selection round; exact day unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-dffround"
      ],
      "summary": "DFF attributes the June2026 round's review and decisions to its external Community Peer Group. This edge does not generalize to every2025 grant or determine actual reserved rights, adoption date or donor control.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-peerselection",
        "source": "w31-fa-peergroup",
        "target": "w31-fa-dffround",
        "label": "was credited with review and grant selection",
        "detail": "DFF attributes the June2026 round's review and decisions to its external Community Peer Group. This edge does not generalize to every2025 grant or determine actual reserved rights, adoption date or donor control.",
        "date": "June2026 selection round; exact day unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Reader9–18.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-dffround"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
      "source": "w31-fa-dff",
      "target": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "label": "reported EUR36000 litigation support",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2026 reported approval; exact day and term unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-dffround",
        "w31-fa-s-dffliberty"
      ],
      "summary": "DFF's linked case page reports Liberty, EUR36000, Litigation Track Support; the dated announcement places the grant in the June2026 round. Exact term, payment and agreement conditions remain not obtained; trailing inconsistent recipient field is preserved as anomaly. Financial details: value: 36,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported litigation-support grant; period: June2026 round; grant term unknown Payment status: unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
        "source": "w31-fa-dff",
        "target": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "label": "reported EUR36000 litigation support",
        "detail": "DFF's linked case page reports Liberty, EUR36000, Litigation Track Support; the dated announcement places the grant in the June2026 round. Exact term, payment and agreement conditions remain not obtained; trailing inconsistent recipient field is preserved as anomaly.",
        "date": "June2026 reported approval; exact day and term unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Casepageprincipalfield/amount/type,reader12–32;announcement37–41actualLibertylink.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-dffround",
          "w31-fa-s-dffliberty"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 36,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported litigation-support grant; period: June2026 round; grant term unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge",
      "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "target": "w31-fa-tcn",
      "label": "was described as pursuing a TCN-regime challenge",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Undated page snapshot2026-09-09; litigation start/end not inferred.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-dffliberty"
      ],
      "summary": "DFF describes Liberty's ongoing challenge to the IPA2016TCN regime concerning compelled encryption access and rights. No court pleading, actual notice or judicial outcome was within the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later proceedings remain outside this candidate. This is separate from the Online Safety Act and age-assurance proposals.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge",
        "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "target": "w31-fa-tcn",
        "label": "was described as pursuing a TCN-regime challenge",
        "detail": "DFF describes Liberty's ongoing challenge to the IPA2016TCN regime concerning compelled encryption access and rights. No court pleading, actual notice or judicial outcome was within the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later proceedings remain outside this candidate. This is separate from the Online Safety Act and age-assurance proposals.",
        "date": "Undated page snapshot2026-09-09; litigation start/end not inferred.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Casebody/strategicgoals,reader35–46;statusfield.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-dffliberty"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-pilot",
      "source": "w31-fa-dff",
      "target": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
      "label": "announced a pre-litigation-only pilot",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-10-08 – 2024-10-08",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-dffpilot"
      ],
      "summary": "The October2024 call proposed peer recommendations replacing the expert-panel stage for pre-litigation grants. Litigation-track grants initially remained under the existing process; later expansion was an intention.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-pilot",
        "source": "w31-fa-dff",
        "target": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
        "label": "announced a pre-litigation-only pilot",
        "detail": "The October2024 call proposed peer recommendations replacing the expert-panel stage for pre-litigation grants. Litigation-track grants initially remained under the existing process; later expansion was an intention.",
        "date": "2024-10-08 – 2024-10-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article lines36-44.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-dffpilot"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
      "source": "w32-gdi-peer",
      "target": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
      "label": "reportedly selected projects in two 2025 rounds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025 rounds; exact selection dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
      ],
      "summary": "DFF retrospective reports ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects, then seventeen choosing thirteen projects across both types. These are reported selections, not inspected award contracts or evidence all2025 DFF decisions used peers.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
        "source": "w32-gdi-peer",
        "target": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
        "label": "reportedly selected projects in two 2025 rounds",
        "detail": "DFF retrospective reports ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects, then seventeen choosing thirteen projects across both types. These are reported selections, not inspected award contracts or evidence all2025 DFF decisions used peers.",
        "date": "2025 rounds; exact selection dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Retrospective lines12-19.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption",
      "source": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
      "target": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
      "label": "reportedly adopted the process in March 2026",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "March2026; exact adoption day unknown. Article publication25March is not substituted for the vote date.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
      ],
      "summary": "Dated retrospective says the board ended the pilot by adopting the process in March2026. No original resolution or complete transfer/retention of legal contracting powers was inspected.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption",
        "source": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
        "target": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
        "label": "reportedly adopted the process in March 2026",
        "detail": "Dated retrospective says the board ended the pilot by adopting the process in March2026. No original resolution or complete transfer/retention of legal contracting powers was inspected.",
        "date": "March2026; exact adoption day unknown. Article publication25March is not substituted for the vote date.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Retrospective line67.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
      "source": "w32-gdi-dffstaff",
      "target": "w32-gdi-peer",
      "label": "provides review information and facilitation",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Retrospective published25March2026; exact practice interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
      ],
      "summary": "Staff facilitate discussion and supply previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Published participant accounts describe judgment factors, not a binding scoring rubric or budget-setting authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
        "source": "w32-gdi-dffstaff",
        "target": "w32-gdi-peer",
        "label": "provides review information and facilitation",
        "detail": "Staff facilitate discussion and supply previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Published participant accounts describe judgment factors, not a binding scoring rubric or budget-setting authority.",
        "date": "Retrospective published25March2026; exact practice interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "Retrospective24,28-38,43-49.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-terms",
      "source": "w32-gdi-peerterms",
      "target": "w32-gdi-peer",
      "label": "is described as requiring confidentiality and conflict commitments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-dffpeer"
      ],
      "summary": "DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-terms",
        "source": "w32-gdi-peerterms",
        "target": "w32-gdi-peer",
        "label": "is described as requiring confidentiality and conflict commitments",
        "detail": "DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Current page line7.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-dffpeer"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-juneselection",
      "source": "w32-gdi-peer",
      "target": "w31-fa-dffround",
      "label": "is credited with selecting the June 2026 grants",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "June2026 selections; individual selection days unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w31-fa-s-dffround",
        "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
      ],
      "summary": "Previously accepted DFF announcement attributes the June round to the Peer Group. The staged-governance records clarify the process; they do not disclose a named Liberty vote, legal signatory or payment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-juneselection",
        "source": "w32-gdi-peer",
        "target": "w31-fa-dffround",
        "label": "is credited with selecting the June 2026 grants",
        "detail": "Previously accepted DFF announcement attributes the June round to the Peer Group. The staged-governance records clarify the process; they do not disclose a named Liberty vote, legal signatory or payment.",
        "date": "June2026 selections; individual selection days unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "18August2026 announcement, June round; March2026 retrospective.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-dffround",
          "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
      "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "target": "w32-gdi-complaint",
      "label": "filed the separate complaint",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Liberty says filing occurred13March2025; tribunal paragraph33 independently acknowledges filing the day before its14March hearing. This precedes the identified June2026 DFF grant, without establishing earlier funding or reimbursement.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
        "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "target": "w32-gdi-complaint",
        "label": "filed the separate complaint",
        "detail": "Liberty says filing occurred13March2025; tribunal paragraph33 independently acknowledges filing the day before its14March hearing. This precedes the identified June2026 DFF grant, without establishing earlier funding or reimbursement.",
        "date": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Liberty reader48-96; judgment PDF8 paragraph33.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
      "source": "w32-gdi-pi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-complaint",
      "label": "co-filed the separate complaint",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Recipient account names PI and two individuals; the tribunal acknowledges the organisations and individuals filed a separate complaint. No individual biographies or original pleading are imported.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
        "source": "w32-gdi-pi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-complaint",
        "label": "co-filed the separate complaint",
        "detail": "Recipient account names PI and two individuals; the tribunal acknowledges the organisations and individuals filed a separate complaint. No individual biographies or original pleading are imported.",
        "date": "2025-03-13 – 2025-03-13",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Liberty48-96; judgment paragraph33.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-representation",
      "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "target": "w32-gdi-leighday",
      "label": "reported instructing counsel for the complaint",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported13March2025; engagement dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling"
      ],
      "summary": "Liberty states the organisations instructed Leigh Day. This is a representation account, not a fee or DFF/Oak payment record.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-representation",
        "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "target": "w32-gdi-leighday",
        "label": "reported instructing counsel for the complaint",
        "detail": "Liberty states the organisations instructed Leigh Day. This is a representation account, not a fee or DFF/Oak payment record.",
        "date": "Reported13March2025; engagement dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "Liberty substantive account.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-courtissued",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ipt",
      "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
      "label": "issued the public procedural judgment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Public ruling is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; neither confirms nor refutes media accounts of the alleged notice.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-courtissued",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ipt",
        "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
        "label": "issued the public procedural judgment",
        "detail": "Public ruling is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment; neither confirms nor refutes media accounts of the alleged notice.",
        "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Caption; paragraphs6,20,42-43.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-govapplication",
      "source": "w32-gdi-respondent",
      "target": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
      "label": "asked to withhold basic case information",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Application heard14March2025; filing day not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Government application concerned basic public details of Apple proceedings. It is not treated as a request to keep every aspect of every separate complaint secret.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-govapplication",
        "source": "w32-gdi-respondent",
        "target": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
        "label": "asked to withhold basic case information",
        "detail": "Government application concerned basic public details of Apple proceedings. It is not treated as a request to keep every aspect of every separate complaint secret.",
        "date": "Application heard14March2025; filing day not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs1-8,32,42-43.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ipt",
      "target": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
      "label": "dismissed the confidentiality application",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "The tribunal refused concealment of basic case details. This procedural outcome is not a merits ruling against encryption-access powers or blanket public access to future proceedings.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ipt",
        "target": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
        "label": "dismissed the confidentiality application",
        "detail": "The tribunal refused concealment of basic case details. This procedural outcome is not a merits ruling against encryption-access powers or blanket public access to future proceedings.",
        "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs32,42-43.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-writtenarguments",
      "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
      "label": "had written arguments considered",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Tribunal considered Liberty and PI arguments while declining attendance at the March hearing. Multiple open-justice submissions existed; exclusive causal credit for the outcome is not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-writtenarguments",
        "source": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
        "label": "had written arguments considered",
        "detail": "Tribunal considered Liberty and PI arguments while declining attendance at the March hearing. Multiple open-justice submissions existed; exclusive causal credit for the outcome is not established.",
        "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF8 paragraph37.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-piarguments",
      "source": "w32-gdi-pi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
      "label": "had written arguments considered",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "PI written arguments were considered alongside Liberty and others. Intervention, pleading disclosure and future hearing arrangements remained unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-piarguments",
        "source": "w32-gdi-pi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
        "label": "had written arguments considered",
        "detail": "PI written arguments were considered alongside Liberty and others. Intervention, pleading disclosure and future hearing arrangements remained unresolved.",
        "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraphs37-40.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ipt",
      "target": "w32-gdi-hearing",
      "label": "kept the March hearing private",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-03-14 – 2025-03-14",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "The court considered third-party written arguments but did not permit the organisations to attend this hearing. That limitation coexists with disclosure of basic case information.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ipt",
        "target": "w32-gdi-hearing",
        "label": "kept the March hearing private",
        "detail": "The court considered third-party written arguments but did not permit the organisations to attend this hearing. That limitation coexists with disclosure of basic case information.",
        "date": "2025-03-14 – 2025-03-14",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Paragraph37; hearing date caption.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-appleparty",
      "source": "w24-ag-apple",
      "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
      "label": "is the applicant named in the public ruling",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
      ],
      "summary": "Apple is the applicant in the caption. Liberty/PI proceedings are separately acknowledged with possible overlap; no completed joinder is claimed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-appleparty",
        "source": "w24-ag-apple",
        "target": "w32-gdi-judgment",
        "label": "is the applicant named in the public ruling",
        "detail": "Apple is the applicant in the caption. Liberty/PI proceedings are separately acknowledged with possible overlap; no completed joinder is claimed.",
        "date": "2025-04-07 – 2025-04-07",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "affiliation",
        "evidence": "Caption; paragraphs33-35.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-ukoperator",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "operates the public website and acts as controller",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Current policy updated20April2026; corporate-role start and end unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-privacy",
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout"
      ],
      "summary": "Privacy section1 and footer identify Disinformation Index Ltd11297397 as operator/controller. This supports the UK legal identity for that role, not parent ownership of the German company or all grant contracts.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-ukoperator",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "operates the public website and acts as controller",
        "detail": "Privacy section1 and footer identify Disinformation Index Ltd11297397 as operator/controller. This supports the UK legal identity for that role, not parent ownership of the German company or all grant contracts.",
        "date": "Current policy updated20April2026; corporate-role start and end unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Privacy section1/company footer; About footer.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-privacy",
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak2023 lists USD903614 over three years for core capacity to expand technological solutions addressing online disinformation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 903,614; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
        "detail": "Oak2023 lists USD903614 over three years for core capacity to expand technological solutions addressing online disinformation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established.",
        "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF26 grant row; PDF6 report grant-making context; root fullpage26 visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 903,614; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak2023 lists USD783133 over three years for core public/policymaker human-rights work. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 783,133; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w31-fa-liberty",
        "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
        "detail": "Oak2023 lists USD783133 over three years for core public/policymaker human-rights work. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established.",
        "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF26 grant row; PDF6 report grant-making context; root fullpage26 visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 783,133; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakorg",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w32-gdi-org",
      "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak2023 lists USD437349 over three years for refugee/migrant-sector work concerning data sharing and immigration-control technologies. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 437,349; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakorg",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w32-gdi-org",
        "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
        "detail": "Oak2023 lists USD437349 over three years for refugee/migrant-sector work concerning data sharing and immigration-control technologies. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established.",
        "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF26 grant row; PDF6 report grant-making context; root fullpage26 visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 437,349; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakpi",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w32-gdi-pi",
      "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak2023 lists USD1138554 over three years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 1,138,554; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-oakpi",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w32-gdi-pi",
        "label": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
        "detail": "Oak2023 lists USD1138554 over three years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established.",
        "date": "Listed in2023 report; approval day and term dates unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF26 grant row; PDF6 report grant-making context; root fullpage26 visual.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,138,554; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "unverified"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-donorpurpose",
      "source": "oak",
      "target": "w32-gdi-del",
      "label": "described support for a commercial-incentive intervention",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-07-03 – 2024-07-03",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-oakstory",
        "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
      ],
      "summary": "Oak programme story supports reducing disinformation commercial incentives and describes DEL licensing to agencies/brand-safety firms/businesses. This is deliberate capacity support, not evidence Oak selects sites or commands buyers. Attributed revenue-reduction estimates are not integrated as measured outcomes.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-donorpurpose",
        "source": "oak",
        "target": "w32-gdi-del",
        "label": "described support for a commercial-incentive intervention",
        "detail": "Oak programme story supports reducing disinformation commercial incentives and describes DEL licensing to agencies/brand-safety firms/businesses. This is deliberate capacity support, not evidence Oak selects sites or commands buyers. Attributed revenue-reduction estimates are not integrated as measured outcomes.",
        "date": "2024-07-03 – 2024-07-03",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "3July2024 story; same narrative/report family.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-oakstory",
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-segment",
      "label": "supplied ratings described in the Oracle product guide",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Copyright2024 guide; precise publication/launch date unknown. Metadata May30/June3 is not substituted.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-oracle"
      ],
      "summary": "Oracle2024 guide says GDI machine learning and expert human review provide high-risk news-website ratings packaged as gi_gdi_pfi. No executed licence, individual activation or GDI-specific default is shown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-segment",
        "label": "supplied ratings described in the Oracle product guide",
        "detail": "Oracle2024 guide says GDI machine learning and expert human review provide high-risk news-website ratings packaged as gi_gdi_pfi. No executed licence, individual activation or GDI-specific default is shown.",
        "date": "Copyright2024 guide; precise publication/launch date unknown. Metadata May30/June3 is not substituted.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF129 full GDI table; PDF2 partnership; PDF128 introduction.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-oracle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
      "source": "w32-gdi-oracle",
      "target": "w32-gdi-segment",
      "label": "offered the GDI contextual segment",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024 guide snapshot; not current channel proof.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-oracle"
      ],
      "summary": "Oracle packages the branded GDI input for targeting/avoidance. The separate Floor-tier default on PDF3 is not assigned to this different segment.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
        "source": "w32-gdi-oracle",
        "target": "w32-gdi-segment",
        "label": "offered the GDI contextual segment",
        "detail": "Oracle packages the branded GDI input for targeting/avoidance. The separate Floor-tier default on PDF3 is not assigned to this different segment.",
        "date": "2024 guide snapshot; not current channel proof.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF3 versus PDF129 identifier.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-oracle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
      "source": "w32-gdi-segment",
      "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
      "label": "offered a selectable contextual input",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-oracle"
      ],
      "summary": "Guide describes third-party segments for targeting or avoiding content. No specific advertiser configuration, bid rejection or revenue loss was acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
        "source": "w32-gdi-segment",
        "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
        "label": "offered a selectable contextual input",
        "detail": "Guide describes third-party segments for targeting or avoiding content. No specific advertiser configuration, bid rejection or revenue loss was acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PDF128-129; introductory capability.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-oracle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
      "source": "w32-gdi-oracle",
      "target": "w32-gdi-segment",
      "label": "announced an end to service and supporting access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Printed FAQ date12August2024; announced service-end30September2024, not independently observed cutover.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-oracleend"
      ],
      "summary": "Version3.0 FAQ includes Contextual Intelligence and integrations in30September2024 end-of-life, no new agreements/renewals and end of data-provider relationships. Informational policy, not runtime proof or current GDI delivery.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
        "source": "w32-gdi-oracle",
        "target": "w32-gdi-segment",
        "label": "announced an end to service and supporting access",
        "detail": "Version3.0 FAQ includes Contextual Intelligence and integrations in30September2024 end-of-life, no new agreements/renewals and end of data-provider relationships. Informational policy, not runtime proof or current GDI delivery.",
        "date": "Printed FAQ date12August2024; announced service-end30September2024, not independently observed cutover.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FAQ PDF1-3,5.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-oracleend"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-priorrights",
      "source": "w32-gdi-oracle",
      "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
      "label": "described conditional rights for previously supplied data",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-08-12 – 2024-08-12",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-oracleend"
      ],
      "summary": "Post-service use depends on product service descriptions and executed terms; reporting/payment obligations may persist. No GDI-specific continuing use, payment or universal deletion is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-priorrights",
        "source": "w32-gdi-oracle",
        "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
        "label": "described conditional rights for previously supplied data",
        "detail": "Post-service use depends on product service descriptions and executed terms; reporting/payment obligations may persist. No GDI-specific continuing use, payment or universal deletion is established.",
        "date": "2024-08-12 – 2024-08-12",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "FAQ PDF3-5, prior-data and provider-payment questions.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-oracleend"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-licensedata",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
      "label": "reported charging for risk data licensed to buyers",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout"
      ],
      "summary": "GDI FON0071 describes commercial data licensing and charges, while licensees retain purchasing/data-use control. No amount, purchaser contract or actual transfer was acquired; current no-media/platform-funding self-description is not reconciled by this historical account.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-licensedata",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
        "label": "reported charging for risk data licensed to buyers",
        "detail": "GDI FON0071 describes commercial data licensing and charges, while licensees retain purchasing/data-use control. No amount, purchaser contract or actual transfer was acquired; current no-media/platform-funding self-description is not reconciled by this historical account.",
        "date": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "FON Service41-54; current About funding statement.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding",
      "source": "w32-gdi-publishers",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
      "label": "can appeal ratings in the described process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Description dated29April2024; process commencement/end and current operation unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence"
      ],
      "summary": "GDI tells Parliament publishers can appeal through a linked form. It reports two-to-three-week review and regular reassessment, not a tested guarantee or presently verified form.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding",
        "source": "w32-gdi-publishers",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
        "label": "can appeal ratings in the described process",
        "detail": "GDI tells Parliament publishers can appeal through a linked form. It reports two-to-three-week review and regular reassessment, not a tested guarantee or presently verified form.",
        "date": "Description dated29April2024; process commencement/end and current operation unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Review Process55-61.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
      "label": "described review and changeable ratings",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence"
      ],
      "summary": "GDI describes reassessment and ratings changing as content changes. No independent appeal tier, successful appeal, deletion/update protocol or obligation for a licensee to resume advertising is supplied.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
        "label": "described review and changeable ratings",
        "detail": "GDI describes reassessment and ratings changing as content changes. No independent appeal tier, successful appeal, deletion/update protocol or obligation for a licensee to resume advertising is supplied.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Review Process55-61.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-researchreview",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
      "target": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
      "label": "offers qualified review of research-output representations",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Policy last updated20April2026; operative start/end not independently established.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "April2026 policy15/19.3 promises consideration and appropriate review/clarification/update, with a post-publication route where no advance notice. It does not guarantee substantive reversal or numerical complaint deadline.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-researchreview",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
        "target": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
        "label": "offers qualified review of research-output representations",
        "detail": "April2026 policy15/19.3 promises consideration and appropriate review/clarification/update, with a post-publication route where no advance notice. It does not guarantee substantive reversal or numerical complaint deadline.",
        "date": "Policy last updated20April2026; operative start/end not independently established.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sections15,19.3; updated20April2026.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits",
      "source": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
      "target": "w32-gdi-publishers",
      "label": "provides a representation route without automatic restoration",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-privacy"
      ],
      "summary": "Research-output concerns may be raised, but policy1 excludes separately contracted service processing. Personal-data deletion/data-subject rights are not a promise to delete a rating, update all recipients or reverse advertising choices.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits",
        "source": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
        "target": "w32-gdi-publishers",
        "label": "provides a representation route without automatic restoration",
        "detail": "Research-output concerns may be raised, but policy1 excludes separately contracted service processing. Personal-data deletion/data-subject rights are not a promise to delete a rating, update all recipients or reverse advertising choices.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Sections1,14-16,19.1-19.3.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-privacy"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
      "label": "was identified as a limited historical input",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Use preceded announced discontinuation; precise interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
      ],
      "summary": "IAS announcement acknowledges past limited GDI input in Context Control Avoidance. Exact fields, start date, customer settings and intermediary contract are not disclosed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
        "label": "was identified as a limited historical input",
        "detail": "IAS announcement acknowledges past limited GDI input in Context Control Avoidance. Exact fields, start date, customer settings and intermediary contract are not disclosed.",
        "date": "Use preceded announced discontinuation; precise interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Full substantive continuous-improvement paragraph.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ias",
      "target": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
      "label": "announced discontinuation of the limited GDI input",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Published18December2025, modified6July2026; captured September2026 wording may differ from original. Exact implementation date unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
      ],
      "summary": "IAS says past GDI use will not affect this solution going forward. This is a product-change account, not observed cache deletion, individual publisher appeal success or independent neutrality finding.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ias",
        "target": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
        "label": "announced discontinuation of the limited GDI input",
        "detail": "IAS says past GDI use will not affect this solution going forward. This is a product-change account, not observed cache deletion, individual publisher appeal success or independent neutrality finding.",
        "date": "Published18December2025, modified6July2026; captured September2026 wording may differ from original. Exact implementation date unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Announcement body; published and modified fields.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices",
      "source": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
      "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
      "label": "allows category and risk-level exclusions",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
      ],
      "summary": "IAS describes customers selecting contextual exclusions. This product capability is separate from which customers selected GDI-derived inputs or changed choices after discontinuation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices",
        "source": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
        "target": "w32-gdi-buyers",
        "label": "allows category and risk-level exclusions",
        "detail": "IAS describes customers selecting contextual exclusions. This product capability is separate from which customers selected GDI-derived inputs or changed choices after discontinuation.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Full substantive product description.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-dashboardplan",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ohmd",
      "label": "describes a forthcoming revenue-estimation dashboard",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout"
      ],
      "summary": "Current About page says the dashboard will estimate open-web/social revenues. No live product or identity with DEL, Oracle segment or AI4TRUST is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-dashboardplan",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ohmd",
        "label": "describes a forthcoming revenue-estimation dashboard",
        "detail": "Current About page says the dashboard will estimate open-web/social revenues. No live product or identity with DEL, Oracle segment or AI4TRUST is established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "How We Estimate the Profits from Harmful Content Online.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "About Us",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "reported providing funding between 2019 and 2022",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report date24February2023; between2019 and2022 exact period boundaries unspecified.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer"
      ],
      "summary": "Ministerial answer149420 reports GBP1999026 provided between2019 and2022 for activities outside the US. Donor-reported aggregate, not a reconciled ledger or contractual restriction on every later use of knowledge/data. Financial details: value: 1,999,026; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported provided funding; period: between2019 and2022; exact boundaries unknown Payment status: donor-reported provision; individual payments unreconciled Which legal entity: Answer uses GDI name without recipient company identifier.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "reported providing funding between 2019 and 2022",
        "detail": "Ministerial answer149420 reports GBP1999026 provided between2019 and2022 for activities outside the US. Donor-reported aggregate, not a reconciled ledger or contractual restriction on every later use of knowledge/data.",
        "date": "Report date24February2023; between2019 and2022 exact period boundaries unspecified.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Entire answer,24February2023.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 1,999,026; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported provided funding; period: between2019 and2022; exact boundaries unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "donor-reported provision; individual payments unreconciled"
          },
          {
            "label": "Which legal entity",
            "text": "Answer uses GDI name without recipient company identifier."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "reported further funding in the then-current financial year",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Then-current financial year asof24February2023; exact payment dates not supplied.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer"
      ],
      "summary": "Same answer reports a further GBP600797 in current financial year2022-2023. Do not add the separately displayed September2022 invoice row as an independent extra transfer. Financial details: value: 600,797; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported further funding; period: FY2022-2023 context Payment status: donor-reported provision; recipient receipt not independently reconciled",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "reported further funding in the then-current financial year",
        "detail": "Same answer reports a further GBP600797 in current financial year2022-2023. Do not add the separately displayed September2022 invoice row as an independent extra transfer.",
        "date": "Then-current financial year asof24February2023; exact payment dates not supplied.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Entire answer,24February2023.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 600,797; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported further funding; period: FY2022-2023 context"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "donor-reported provision; recipient receipt not independently reconciled"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "records a supplier invoice line with a 5 September 2022 GL date",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "GL accounting date only; preview updated28November2024. Not last-payment proof.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger"
      ],
      "summary": "Selected September2022 row records GBP130506, GL date5September2022, identifier300,000,130,671,861 line1, supplier GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX, Project Management category. GL date is not verified bank settlement, identifier not grant number, and row not allocated to either parliamentary total. Financial details: value: 130,506; currency: GBP; kind: published ledger/invoice-line amount; period: September2022 ledger; GL date5September Payment status: bank settlement unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "records a supplier invoice line with a 5 September 2022 GL date",
        "detail": "Selected September2022 row records GBP130506, GL date5September2022, identifier300,000,130,671,861 line1, supplier GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX, Project Management category. GL date is not verified bank settlement, identifier not grant number, and row not allocated to either parliamentary total.",
        "date": "GL accounting date only; preview updated28November2024. Not last-payment proof.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "CSV preview headers58-62 and matched row741.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 130,506; currency: GBP; kind: published ledger/invoice-line amount; period: September2022 ledger; GL date5September"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "bank settlement unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "label": "is named as a programme partner",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Programme April2016-March2023; summary published30January2025.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
      ],
      "summary": "Retrospectively published summary identifies FCDO and Cabinet Office as programme partners. No GDI-specific grant component is identified.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
        "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "label": "is named as a programme partner",
        "detail": "Retrospectively published summary identifies FCDO and Cabinet Office as programme partners. No GDI-specific grant component is identified.",
        "date": "Programme April2016-March2023; summary published30January2025.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Programme header and component table.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-cabinetpartner",
      "source": "w32-gdi-cabinet",
      "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "label": "is named as a programme partner",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
      ],
      "summary": "Generic programme partnership does not establish that Cabinet Office approved a GDI rating or commercial licence.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-cabinetpartner",
        "source": "w32-gdi-cabinet",
        "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "label": "is named as a programme partner",
        "detail": "Generic programme partnership does not establish that Cabinet Office approved a GDI rating or commercial licence.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Programme partner fields.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-programmebudget",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "label": "published programme-level budget allocations",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Summary published30January2025; historical budget period, not exact governing2022 bytes.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
      ],
      "summary": "Summary lists FY2022-2023 GBP12million ODA and GBP21.1million non-ODA allocations. GDI is not named; these are not GDI income or demonstrated expenditure.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-programmebudget",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
        "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "label": "published programme-level budget allocations",
        "detail": "Summary lists FY2022-2023 GBP12million ODA and GBP21.1million non-ODA allocations. GDI is not named; these are not GDI income or demonstrated expenditure.",
        "date": "Summary published30January2025; historical budget period, not exact governing2022 bytes.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "FY22-23 budget allocation fields.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-fundedremit",
      "source": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "was identified as supporting outside-US activities",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
        "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
      ],
      "summary": "Donor answer ties GDI support to CDMD and outside-US activities. Generic programme region/strategy cannot locate the GDI component or prove FCDO commissioned later US advertising exclusions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-fundedremit",
        "source": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "was identified as supporting outside-US activities",
        "detail": "Donor answer ties GDI support to CDMD and outside-US activities. Generic programme region/strategy cannot locate the GDI component or prove FCDO commissioned later US advertising exclusions.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Answer149420 versus programme summary.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
          "w32-gdi-s-cdmd"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-expectedreviews",
      "source": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "label": "was described as having an expected reporting and review relationship",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-02-24 – 2023-02-24",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer"
      ],
      "summary": "Answer says there will have been frequent contact and regular performance reports/reviews. No actual count, reports, instructions or rating-level approval rights were acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-expectedreviews",
        "source": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "label": "was described as having an expected reporting and review relationship",
        "detail": "Answer says there will have been frequent contact and regular performance reports/reviews. No actual count, reports, instructions or rating-level approval rights were acquired.",
        "date": "2023-02-24 – 2023-02-24",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Answer149420 discussion paragraph.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-recipientperiod",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
      "label": "described historical funding and a later grant expiry",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
        "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger"
      ],
      "summary": "FON0071 says no UK government funding since2022, describes work in2018-2022 and grant expiryMarch2023. Receipt-period and expiry labels can coexist; differences with donor start-period wording remain unreconciled.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-recipientperiod",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
        "label": "described historical funding and a later grant expiry",
        "detail": "FON0071 says no UK government funding since2022, describes work in2018-2022 and grant expiryMarch2023. Receipt-period and expiry labels can coexist; differences with donor start-period wording remain unreconciled.",
        "date": "2024-04-29 – 2024-04-29",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "FON Government Funding16-20; donor answer and selected row.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "label": "published the whole-project EU contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Project interval; EC signature6December2022, registry last updated17June2026; not disbursement dates.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
      ],
      "summary": "CORDIS records EUR5950682.50 project contribution and cost. This is an aggregate project field, not GDI income or a dated payout. The separately displayed German participant contribution is included within this project, not extra funding to add. Financial details: value: 5,950,682.5; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU project contribution; period: project1January2023-28February2026 Payment status: dated transfers unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "label": "published the whole-project EU contribution",
        "detail": "CORDIS records EUR5950682.50 project contribution and cost. This is an aggregate project field, not GDI income or a dated payout. The separately displayed German participant contribution is included within this project, not extra funding to add.",
        "date": "Project interval; EC signature6December2022, registry last updated17June2026; not disbursement dates.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Project financial header and definitions.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 5,950,682.5; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU project contribution; period: project1January2023-28February2026"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "dated transfers unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdide",
      "label": "published a participant contribution of EUR 385275",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Project1January2023-28February2026; exact participant accession/payment dates not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
      ],
      "summary": "CORDIS German GDI participant entry lists net EU contribution and total cost each EUR385275. The recipient is the German legal participant, not proven UK receipt, subaward or a bank transfer. Financial details: value: 385,275; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU participant contribution; period: AI4TRUST project interval; payout dates unknown Payment status: dated participant cash transfers unverified",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdide",
        "label": "published a participant contribution of EUR 385275",
        "detail": "CORDIS German GDI participant entry lists net EU contribution and total cost each EUR385275. The recipient is the German legal participant, not proven UK receipt, subaward or a bank transfer.",
        "date": "Project1January2023-28February2026; exact participant accession/payment dates not obtained.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "German participant entry460-501.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 385,275; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU participant contribution; period: AI4TRUST project interval; payout dates unknown"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "dated participant cash transfers unverified"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-participant",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdide",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "label": "is listed as a funded participant",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Listed against project1January2023-28February2026; actual participant accession/exit dates not acquired.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
      ],
      "summary": "CORDIS lists the German entity in participant section, distinct from non-signing associated partners. No executed accession, UK guarantee or corporate ownership is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-participant",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdide",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "label": "is listed as a funded participant",
        "detail": "CORDIS lists the German entity in participant section, distinct from non-signing associated partners. No executed accession, UK guarantee or corporate ownership is inferred.",
        "date": "Listed against project1January2023-28February2026; actual participant accession/exit dates not acquired.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "German entry and partner definition.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-coordination",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fbk",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "label": "is named as project coordinator",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Coordinator listed for project1January2023-28February2026; actual role appointment/exit dates not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
      ],
      "summary": "CORDIS names Fondazione Bruno Kessler coordinator. Public identity does not disclose consortium reserved votes, payment approvals or exclusive IP ownership.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-coordination",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fbk",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "label": "is named as project coordinator",
        "detail": "CORDIS names Fondazione Bruno Kessler coordinator. Public identity does not disclose consortium reserved votes, payment approvals or exclusive IP ownership.",
        "date": "Coordinator listed for project1January2023-28February2026; actual role appointment/exit dates not obtained.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Coordinator field.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-reportedclosed",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "label": "lists the research project as closed",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
      ],
      "summary": "CORDIS updated17June2026 labels the project closed with28February2026 end. This is project administrative status, not a declaration every resulting tool stopped or all final deliverables were accepted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-reportedclosed",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "label": "lists the research project as closed",
        "detail": "CORDIS updated17June2026 labels the project closed with28February2026 end. This is project administrative status, not a declaration every resulting tool stopped or all final deliverables were accepted.",
        "date": "2026-06-17 – 2026-06-17",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Header dates/closed field.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cordis"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
      "source": "w32-gdi-fbk",
      "target": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "label": "edited and recorded coordinator review before submission",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-11-01 – 2023-11-01",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-d21"
      ],
      "summary": "D2.1 identifies FBK as editor and records final coordinator review on 1 November 2023. PDF2 positively designates PU: Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission in bold. These are internal document designations, not Commission acceptance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
        "source": "w32-gdi-fbk",
        "target": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "label": "edited and recorded coordinator review before submission",
        "detail": "D2.1 identifies FBK as editor and records final coordinator review on 1 November 2023. PDF2 positively designates PU: Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission in bold. These are internal document designations, not Commission acceptance.",
        "date": "2023-11-01 – 2023-11-01",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF2 document information; PDF3 version1.0.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ucamreview",
      "target": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "label": "is credited with the designated quality-manager review",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2023-10-27 – 2023-10-27",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-d21"
      ],
      "summary": "Modification table version0.6 credits UCAM quality review27October2023. This is internal document review, not a public threshold approval policy or Commission acceptance.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ucamreview",
        "target": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "label": "is credited with the designated quality-manager review",
        "detail": "Modification table version0.6 credits UCAM quality review27October2023. This is internal document review, not a public threshold approval policy or Commission acceptance.",
        "date": "2023-10-27 – 2023-10-27",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF3 modification table.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "label": "contributed pre-existing keyword resources to the design",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Submitted1November2023; individual contribution dates unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-d21"
      ],
      "summary": "D2.1 explicitly uses existing GDI lists among research, media and fact-checker contributions and some ChatGPT suggestions. No individual seed term is attributed exclusively to GDI, and the report does not establish which legal entity owned each background asset.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "label": "contributed pre-existing keyword resources to the design",
        "detail": "D2.1 explicitly uses existing GDI lists among research, media and fact-checker contributions and some ChatGPT suggestions. No individual seed term is attributed exclusively to GDI, and the report does not establish which legal entity owned each background asset.",
        "date": "Submitted1November2023; individual contribution dates unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "PDF55; contributor tablePDF2.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
      "source": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "target": "w32-gdi-seeds",
      "label": "defines a mixed-source collection perimeter",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-d21"
      ],
      "summary": "Selected initial topics and reusable relevance/feasibility criteria guide development/test collection. Neutral topics coexist with charged language; broad lists are refined. Inclusion is not a person/site falsehood finding, automatic sanction list or proven runtime configuration.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
        "source": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "target": "w32-gdi-seeds",
        "label": "defines a mixed-source collection perimeter",
        "detail": "Selected initial topics and reusable relevance/feasibility criteria guide development/test collection. Neutral topics coexist with charged language; broad lists are refined. Inclusion is not a person/site falsehood finding, automatic sanction list or proven runtime configuration.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Root seed reading PDF53-59,81-82; contents4-5.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-framing",
      "source": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "target": "w32-gdi-framing",
      "label": "expressly adopts an intersectional methodological frame",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-d21"
      ],
      "summary": "PDF58-59 describes attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. The effect on annotation labels, thresholds or coverage remains a question for further records, not an observed exclusion result.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-framing",
        "source": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "target": "w32-gdi-framing",
        "label": "expressly adopts an intersectional methodological frame",
        "detail": "PDF58-59 describes attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. The effect on annotation labels, thresholds or coverage remains a question for further records, not an observed exclusion result.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Root selected PDF58-59.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-researchdesign",
      "source": "w32-gdi-d21",
      "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "label": "describes purpose-limited collection and agreement-dependent access",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Submitted1November2023; agreement execution not established.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-d21"
      ],
      "summary": "Design record says planned collection is purpose-limited and consortium interface access depends on data-sharing agreements. Mentioned internal GDI policies and generic NCSR-D/FBK licence guidance are not executed GDI terms.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-researchdesign",
        "source": "w32-gdi-d21",
        "target": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "label": "describes purpose-limited collection and agreement-dependent access",
        "detail": "Design record says planned collection is purpose-limited and consortium interface access depends on data-sharing agreements. Mentioned internal GDI policies and generic NCSR-D/FBK licence guidance are not executed GDI terms.",
        "date": "Submitted1November2023; agreement execution not established.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF60-65,68-69.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-dsscontribution",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdidss",
      "label": "reported developing the decision-support contribution",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
      ],
      "summary": "GDI20April2026 account describes combined signals surfacing risk patterns for human review within the Monitoring Dashboard. This attributed output is not identified as DEL, Oracle, IAS or prospective OHMD; no transfer licence or deployed commercial link is acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-dsscontribution",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdidss",
        "label": "reported developing the decision-support contribution",
        "detail": "GDI20April2026 account describes combined signals surfacing risk patterns for human review within the Monitoring Dashboard. This attributed output is not identified as DEL, Oracle, IAS or prospective OHMD; no transfer licence or deployed commercial link is acquired.",
        "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "What AI4TRUST delivered.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-annotations",
      "source": "w32-gdi-factcheckers",
      "target": "w32-gdi-gdidss",
      "label": "are reported as supplying training annotations",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Reported20April2026; annotation interval unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
      ],
      "summary": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No codebook, final labels or independent sample validity audit is acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-annotations",
        "source": "w32-gdi-factcheckers",
        "target": "w32-gdi-gdidss",
        "label": "are reported as supplying training annotations",
        "detail": "GDI attributes training annotations to consortium fact-checkers. No codebook, final labels or independent sample validity audit is acquired.",
        "date": "Reported20April2026; annotation interval unknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "What AI4TRUST delivered.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-requests",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
      "label": "requests new vetting, compatibility and audit arrangements",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
      ],
      "summary": "The retrospective calls for faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and researcher audit access. Recommendations are not an enacted obligation, granted status or awarded API permission.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-requests",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
        "label": "requests new vetting, compatibility and audit arrangements",
        "detail": "The retrospective calls for faster Article40 vetting, mandatory API compatibility with approved third-party detection and researcher audit access. Recommendations are not an enacted obligation, granted status or awarded API permission.",
        "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Recommendations.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole",
      "source": "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
      "target": "w32-gdi-platforms",
      "label": "would require compatibility and audit access if adopted",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
      ],
      "summary": "GDI asks for platforms to accommodate approved detection tools and audit access. This edge encodes requested behavior only; actual applications/refusals and adopted legal duties were not in this wave.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole",
        "source": "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
        "target": "w32-gdi-platforms",
        "label": "would require compatibility and audit access if adopted",
        "detail": "GDI asks for platforms to accommodate approved detection tools and audit access. This edge encodes requested behavior only; actual applications/refusals and adopted legal duties were not in this wave.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Recommendations and access account.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-refusalsreported",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w32-gdi-platforms",
      "label": "reported research-access refusals",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
      ],
      "summary": "Article describes platforms frustrating research access, but original applications and responses are not obtained. No independent ruling on those decisions or universal platform behavior is inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-refusalsreported",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w32-gdi-platforms",
        "label": "reported research-access refusals",
        "detail": "Article describes platforms frustrating research access, but original applications and responses are not obtained. No independent ruling on those decisions or universal platform behavior is inferred.",
        "date": "2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Substantive access narrative.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "target": "w32-gdi-warning",
      "label": "reports a six-tool calibrated ensemble for triage",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Report period1March2024-28February2026; updated3August2026, not operational launch date.",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
      ],
      "summary": "Final-period report describes an ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration, combining six AI tools and providing triage categories/feature attribution. Exact inputs, weights, category thresholds and approval rules are not published in this read record.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "target": "w32-gdi-warning",
        "label": "reports a six-tool calibrated ensemble for triage",
        "detail": "Final-period report describes an ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration, combining six AI tools and providing triage categories/feature attribution. Exact inputs, weights, category thresholds and approval rules are not published in this read record.",
        "date": "Report period1March2024-28February2026; updated3August2026, not operational launch date.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Period2 Work performed, WP3, reader141.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "target": "w32-gdi-textsignals",
      "label": "reports a component-specific weighted F1 of about 56 percent",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
      ],
      "summary": "The metric applies to the textual signals tool detecting39signals across6tactics/8languages. It is not aggregate warning-system performance or probability a particular claim is false. No benchmark was reproduced.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "target": "w32-gdi-textsignals",
        "label": "reports a component-specific weighted F1 of about 56 percent",
        "detail": "The metric applies to the textual signals tool detecting39signals across6tactics/8languages. It is not aggregate warning-system performance or probability a particular claim is false. No benchmark was reproduced.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "WP3 textual component, reader137.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "target": "w32-gdi-validation",
      "label": "reports an enhanced human-validation dashboard",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
      ],
      "summary": "Final report describes the named dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It supplies no override, score replacement, reasons, publisher appeal or correction-propagation rule.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "target": "w32-gdi-validation",
        "label": "reports an enhanced human-validation dashboard",
        "detail": "Final report describes the named dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It supplies no override, score replacement, reasons, publisher appeal or correction-propagation rule.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "WP5, reader143.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation",
      "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "target": "w32-gdi-evaluation",
      "label": "reports three evaluation rounds involving 206 users",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
      ],
      "summary": "Population includes media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These reported rounds are not an independent Commission audit, actual downstream recipient list or measured advertising effect.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation",
        "source": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
        "target": "w32-gdi-evaluation",
        "label": "reports three evaluation rounds involving 206 users",
        "detail": "Population includes media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These reported rounds are not an independent Commission audit, actual downstream recipient list or measured advertising effect.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "resources",
        "evidence": "WP6, reader144.",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-finalreport"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-delegationbasis",
      "source": "w33-con-dsa",
      "target": "w33-con-delegated",
      "label": "provides the basis for technical data-sharing conditions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa",
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "DSA40(13) authorises delegated technical conditions;2025/2050Article1 specifies paragraph4 researcher-access scope. This is statutory lineage, not uptake of GDI recommendations.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-delegationbasis",
        "source": "w33-con-dsa",
        "target": "w33-con-delegated",
        "label": "provides the basis for technical data-sharing conditions",
        "detail": "DSA40(13) authorises delegated technical conditions;2025/2050Article1 specifies paragraph4 researcher-access scope. This is statutory lineage, not uptake of GDI recommendations.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "DSA40(13);2025/2050Article1",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa",
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-adoptprocedure",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-delegated",
      "label": "adopted the project-specific research-access procedures",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Published adopted regulation assigns prerequisites, request formulation, access modalities and amendment/delivery records. No named project approval or60-day GDI proposal adoption inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-adoptprocedure",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-delegated",
        "label": "adopted the project-specific research-access procedures",
        "detail": "Published adopted regulation assigns prerequisites, request formulation, access modalities and amendment/delivery records. No named project approval or60-day GDI proposal adoption inferred.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "2025/2050Articles1–16;OJ9October2025",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-vetting",
      "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-vetted",
      "label": "grants project-specific vetted status when conditions are met",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Article40(8) specifies final eligibility decision; funding or Horizon participation does not itself confer status.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-vetting",
        "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-vetted",
        "label": "grants project-specific vetted status when conditions are met",
        "detail": "Article40(8) specifies final eligibility decision; funding or Horizon participation does not itself confer status.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article40(4),(8)–(11)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
      "source": "w33-con-homedsc",
      "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "label": "forwards application and initial assessment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Home DSC assesses first; final decision expressly remains with establishment DSC.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
        "source": "w33-con-homedsc",
        "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "label": "forwards application and initial assessment",
        "detail": "Home DSC assesses first; final decision expressly remains with establishment DSC.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article40(9)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
      "source": "w33-con-vetted",
      "target": "w33-con-request",
      "label": "must demonstrate eligibility and disclose project funding",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated",
        "w33-con-s-definition"
      ],
      "summary": "OperativeArticle8 requires project funding information and relevant commercial-independence declaration. Recital12 describes identity, amount, duration/nature, awarded/pending status and available funder evaluations. No actual declaration read.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
        "source": "w33-con-vetted",
        "target": "w33-con-request",
        "label": "must demonstrate eligibility and disclose project funding",
        "detail": "OperativeArticle8 requires project funding information and relevant commercial-independence declaration. Recital12 describes identity, amount, duration/nature, awarded/pending status and available funder evaluations. No actual declaration read.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "2025/2050Article8,recitals11–12;2019/790Article2(1),recital12",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated",
          "w33-con-s-definition"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-modalities",
      "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-request",
      "label": "sets technical legal and organisational access conditions",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Case-specific security, confidentiality, contracts and optional secure environments constrain access; raw-data transmission and nominated-tool integration are not automatic.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-modalities",
        "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-request",
        "label": "sets technical legal and organisational access conditions",
        "detail": "Case-specific security, confidentiality, contracts and optional secure environments constrain access; raw-data transmission and nominated-tool integration are not automatic.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Articles9–10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-clock",
      "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-request",
      "label": "must formulate the request or explain refusal within80working days",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Article7 allows a duly justified extension with reasons and new date. Request specifies a separate access-start date;80working days does not promise delivery.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-clock",
        "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-request",
        "label": "must formulate the request or explain refusal within80working days",
        "detail": "Article7 allows a duly justified extension with reasons and new date. Request specifies a separate access-start date;80working days does not promise delivery.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Articles7,10",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-provide",
      "source": "w33-con-providers",
      "target": "w33-con-vetted",
      "label": "must provide access under a reasoned request",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa",
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Data and appropriate interface follow the request within its reasonable period. Standard-tool/data-management restrictions that hinder research require explicit request provision; no additional personal-data conditions outside request.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-provide",
        "source": "w33-con-providers",
        "target": "w33-con-vetted",
        "label": "must provide access under a reasoned request",
        "detail": "Data and appropriate interface follow the request within its reasonable period. Standard-tool/data-management restrictions that hinder research require explicit request provision; no additional personal-data conditions outside request.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "DSA40(4),(7);2025/2050Article15(2)–(4)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa",
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-amend",
      "source": "w33-con-providers",
      "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "label": "may request amendment on specified access or security grounds",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa",
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Provider has15days after receipt and must propose alternatives; DSC decides within15days. Additional information does not displace that decision deadline.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-amend",
        "source": "w33-con-providers",
        "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "label": "may request amendment on specified access or security grounds",
        "detail": "Provider has15days after receipt and must propose alternatives; DSC decides within15days. Additional information does not displace that decision deadline.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "DSA40(5)–(6);2025/2050Article12",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa",
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-mediation",
      "source": "w33-con-providers",
      "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "label": "may seek mediation after an amendment decision",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Provider may request within5working days and bears costs. DSC participation is optional, judicial rights preserved; no agreement leaves last DSC decision valid. No mediation exercise acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-mediation",
        "source": "w33-con-providers",
        "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "label": "may seek mediation after an amendment decision",
        "detail": "Provider may request within5working days and bears costs. DSC participation is optional, judicial rights preserved; no agreement leaves last DSC decision valid. No mediation exercise acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article13(1)–(2),(6),(8),(11)–(13)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-experts",
      "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-experts",
      "label": "may consult independent impartial experts",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Experts declare no financial/personal ties, outcome interest or conflict; opinions recorded inAGORA. No expert appointment or payment acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-experts",
        "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-experts",
        "label": "may consult independent impartial experts",
        "detail": "Experts declare no financial/personal ties, outcome interest or conflict; opinions recorded inAGORA. No expert appointment or payment acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article14",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-publish",
      "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-portal",
      "label": "must publish an overview of an issued reasoned request",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Overview includes research topic, provider, data and modalities, updated for amendments/mediation. It is not an all-applications/rejections register and need not name applicant/funder.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-publish",
        "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-portal",
        "label": "must publish an overview of an issued reasoned request",
        "detail": "Overview includes research topic, provider, data and modalities, updated for amendments/mediation. It is not an all-applications/rejections register and need not name applicant/funder.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Articles8(g),11",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-portalhost",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-portal",
      "label": "must establish and host the portal",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated",
        "w33-con-s-portal"
      ],
      "summary": "Article3 assigns hosting and workflow functions. The captured shell is not evidence the register has no rows or requires login for public overviews.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-portalhost",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-portal",
        "label": "must establish and host the portal",
        "detail": "Article3 assigns hosting and workflow functions. The captured shell is not evidence the register has no rows or requires login for public overviews.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Article3;portal shell scope",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
            "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated",
          "w33-con-s-portal"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-fulfilnotify",
      "source": "w33-con-providers",
      "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "label": "must notify actual access provision or termination within3working days",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-delegated"
      ],
      "summary": "Notification and supporting access documentation are distinct from permission or a public overview; no named fulfilment notice acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-fulfilnotify",
        "source": "w33-con-providers",
        "target": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "label": "must notify actual access provision or termination within3working days",
        "detail": "Notification and supporting access documentation are distinct from permission or a public overview; no named fulfilment notice acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Article15(1)–(2)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-delegated"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-terminate",
      "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-vetted",
      "label": "terminates access if eligibility is lost after investigation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Researcher must be allowed to respond before access termination; no actual named termination or reinstatement record acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-terminate",
        "source": "w33-con-estdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-vetted",
        "label": "terminates access if eligibility is lost after investigation",
        "detail": "Researcher must be allowed to respond before access termination; no actual named termination or reinstatement record acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article40(10)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-publicaccess",
      "source": "w33-con-providers",
      "target": "w33-con-publicresearch",
      "label": "must give qualifying researchers public-data access without undue delay",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "40(12) imports40(8)(b)–(e), including funding disclosure and proportionality, for systemic-risk research. It is separate from paragraph4 project vetting.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-publicaccess",
        "source": "w33-con-providers",
        "target": "w33-con-publicresearch",
        "label": "must give qualifying researchers public-data access without undue delay",
        "detail": "40(12) imports40(8)(b)–(e), including funding disclosure and proportionality, for systemic-risk research. It is separate from paragraph4 project vetting.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Article40(12)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-flagaward",
      "source": "w33-con-flaggerdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-flagger",
      "label": "awards status on demonstrated expertise independence and diligent work",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Applicant-establishment DSC decides; no GDI or other named flagger approval inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-flagaward",
        "source": "w33-con-flaggerdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-flagger",
        "label": "awards status on demonstrated expertise independence and diligent work",
        "detail": "Applicant-establishment DSC decides; no GDI or other named flagger approval inferred.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article22(2)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-priority",
      "source": "w33-con-flagger",
      "target": "w33-con-noticeproviders",
      "label": "receives priority processing for notices within designated expertise",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Necessary priority/undue-delay processing is required, but platform decision on each notice remains; status is not automatic takedown authority.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-priority",
        "source": "w33-con-flagger",
        "target": "w33-con-noticeproviders",
        "label": "receives priority processing for notices within designated expertise",
        "detail": "Necessary priority/undue-delay processing is required, but platform decision on each notice remains; status is not automatic takedown authority.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Article22(1)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-flagreview",
      "source": "w33-con-flaggerdsc",
      "target": "w33-con-flagger",
      "label": "must suspend or revoke when specified evidentiary conditions are met",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-dsa"
      ],
      "summary": "Insufficiently precise/inaccurate notices can trigger investigation/suspension; revocation requires findings and response opportunity. Annual reports and independence explanation are separately required.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-flagreview",
        "source": "w33-con-flaggerdsc",
        "target": "w33-con-flagger",
        "label": "must suspend or revoke when specified evidentiary conditions are met",
        "detail": "Insufficiently precise/inaccurate notices can trigger investigation/suspension; revocation requires findings and response opportunity. Annual reports and independence explanation are separately required.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article22(3),(6)–(7)",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-bindnl",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-alinl",
      "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-18",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Actual18June2025Article71 act; access commitments settle covered proceedings without an Article40 infringement adjudication or admission.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-bindnl",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-alinl",
        "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
        "detail": "Actual18June2025Article71 act; access commitments settle covered proceedings without an Article40 infringement adjudication or admission.",
        "date": "2025-06-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Articles1–3 PDF50–51;recitals156–164;annexPDF54",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-bindsg",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-alisg",
      "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-06-18",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Same decision and obligation family, not a second transfer or independent sanction. ExactSingaporeE-commercePrivateLimited name preserved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-bindsg",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-alisg",
        "label": "made annexed commitments binding on the named addressee",
        "detail": "Same decision and obligation family, not a second transfer or independent sanction. ExactSingaporeE-commercePrivateLimited name preserved.",
        "date": "2025-06-18",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Articles1–3 PDF50–51",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-commitservice",
      "source": "w33-con-commitments",
      "target": "w33-con-ali",
      "label": "requires a qualifying-public-data access process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Full obligations after30September2025 initial implementation; effective receipt date not obtained.",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "AnnexB.V concerns40(12), not named vetted40(4) access. Portal/dataset instructions, machine-readable downloads and near-real-time readily availableAPI data required; no live verification.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-commitservice",
        "source": "w33-con-commitments",
        "target": "w33-con-ali",
        "label": "requires a qualifying-public-data access process",
        "detail": "AnnexB.V concerns40(12), not named vetted40(4) access. Portal/dataset instructions, machine-readable downloads and near-real-time readily availableAPI data required; no live verification.",
        "date": "Full obligations after30September2025 initial implementation; effective receipt date not obtained.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "B.V.1–2 PDF64–65",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-assessment",
      "source": "w33-con-ali",
      "target": "w33-con-publicresearch",
      "label": "must assess eligibility within15business days",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Trained staff and internal SOP required. Approval is conditional; custom deployment expected within7business days except complex development. No automatic approval/delivery inference.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-assessment",
        "source": "w33-con-ali",
        "target": "w33-con-publicresearch",
        "label": "must assess eligibility within15business days",
        "detail": "Trained staff and internal SOP required. Approval is conditional; custom deployment expected within7business days except complex development. No automatic approval/delivery inference.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B.V.3(i–iv) PDF65",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-qa",
      "source": "w33-con-ali",
      "target": "w33-con-qa",
      "label": "must monitor API accuracy stability and processing metrics",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Quarterly retrieval/reconciliation/API tests and semiannual reporting are duties, not test results.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-qa",
        "source": "w33-con-ali",
        "target": "w33-con-qa",
        "label": "must monitor API accuracy stability and processing metrics",
        "detail": "Quarterly retrieval/reconciliation/API tests and semiannual reporting are duties, not test results.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "B.V.6–7 PDF66",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
      "source": "w33-con-ali",
      "target": "w33-con-ankura",
      "label": "must fund the approved trustee on noncontingent terms",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision",
        "w33-con-s-trustee"
      ],
      "summary": "Provider proposes candidate/mandate and pays fees independent of results. No executed fee schedule, amount, invoice or payment acquired. Commission approval remains separate. Payment status: Obligation; actual paid amount unknown",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
        "source": "w33-con-ali",
        "target": "w33-con-ankura",
        "label": "must fund the approved trustee on noncontingent terms",
        "detail": "Provider proposes candidate/mandate and pays fees independent of results. No executed fee schedule, amount, invoice or payment acquired. Commission approval remains separate.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "C.1–5 PDF74–75",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision",
          "w33-con-s-trustee"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Obligation; actual paid amount unknown"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-approveankura",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-ankura",
      "label": "approved the named monitoring trustee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-23",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-trustee"
      ],
      "summary": "Official notice records23September2025approval; no report delivery, performance approval or fee payment established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-approveankura",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-ankura",
        "label": "approved the named monitoring trustee",
        "detail": "Official notice records23September2025approval; no report delivery, performance approval or fee payment established.",
        "date": "2025-09-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Entire one-page notice",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-trustee"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-mandate",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-ankura",
      "label": "approves mandate and may instruct or replace the trustee",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Commission may reject/modify mandate and issue compliance instructions; replacement/discharge/hand-over governedC.7–8. No exercised instruction/replacement acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-mandate",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-ankura",
        "label": "approves mandate and may instruct or replace the trustee",
        "detail": "Commission may reject/modify mandate and issue compliance instructions; replacement/discharge/hand-over governedC.7–8. No exercised instruction/replacement acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "C.5,C.7–8,C.12 PDF75–77",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-monitor",
      "source": "w33-con-ankura",
      "target": "w33-con-ali",
      "label": "must monitor and report without business decision powers",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Trustee may recommend measures and promptly report reasonably concluded failure; cannot make product/business/technical decisions or exercise Commission investigative powers. Change notice is not prior approval; experimental changes excepted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-monitor",
        "source": "w33-con-ankura",
        "target": "w33-con-ali",
        "label": "must monitor and report without business decision powers",
        "detail": "Trustee may recommend measures and promptly report reasonably concluded failure; cannot make product/business/technical decisions or exercise Commission investigative powers. Change notice is not prior approval; experimental changes excepted.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "C.12–13,C.17 PDF76–77",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-qareport",
      "source": "w33-con-qa",
      "target": "w33-con-ankura",
      "label": "must send semiannual access counts tests and feedback",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Received/processed/approved/rejected metrics and feedback required; no actual report acquired. Recital174 ongoingQA expectation and AnnexD broader lapse wording remain unresolved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-qareport",
        "source": "w33-con-qa",
        "target": "w33-con-ankura",
        "label": "must send semiannual access counts tests and feedback",
        "detail": "Received/processed/approved/rejected metrics and feedback required; no actual report acquired. Recital174 ongoingQA expectation and AnnexD broader lapse wording remain unresolved.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "B.V.7 PDF66;recital174 PDF49;AnnexD PDF78",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-trustreport",
      "source": "w33-con-ankura",
      "target": "european-commission",
      "label": "must submit monitoring reports and promptly flag concluded failure",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "C.9 prints impossible31November2027;recital16730November/C.12 two months.2026cycle not yet ended9September2026; no silent correction.",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision",
        "w33-con-s-trustee"
      ],
      "summary": "First cycle ends30September2025, first report due within2months; later cycles endSeptember2026/2027. Company copy may remove third-party confidential material. No actual receipt/report/response acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-trustreport",
        "source": "w33-con-ankura",
        "target": "european-commission",
        "label": "must submit monitoring reports and promptly flag concluded failure",
        "detail": "First cycle ends30September2025, first report due within2months; later cycles endSeptember2026/2027. Company copy may remove third-party confidential material. No actual receipt/report/response acquired.",
        "date": "C.9 prints impossible31November2027;recital16730November/C.12 two months.2026cycle not yet ended9September2026; no silent correction.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "C.10–14 PDF75–77",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision",
          "w33-con-s-trustee"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-reportscope",
      "source": "w33-con-commitments",
      "target": "w33-con-trustreport",
      "label": "defines reporting cycles separate from five-year substantive term",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Effective date is receipt, not obtained. Trustee mandate to final2027cycle report, substantive measures5years. C.9 typo and recital174/AnnexD monitoring-lapse tension preserved; ordinaryArticle37audits distinct.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-reportscope",
        "source": "w33-con-commitments",
        "target": "w33-con-trustreport",
        "label": "defines reporting cycles separate from five-year substantive term",
        "detail": "Effective date is receipt, not obtained. Trustee mandate to final2027cycle report, substantive measures5years. C.9 typo and recital174/AnnexD monitoring-lapse tension preserved; ordinaryArticle37audits distinct.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "DefinitionPDF55;recitals167,174;C.9–12;D–E PDF78",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-toauditor",
      "source": "w33-con-ankura",
      "target": "w33-con-auditrole",
      "label": "must permit relevant trustee-document access on auditor request",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "C.14 provides auditor access at its request; no observed exchange or researcher/public disclosure follows.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-toauditor",
        "source": "w33-con-ankura",
        "target": "w33-con-auditrole",
        "label": "must permit relevant trustee-document access on auditor request",
        "detail": "C.14 provides auditor access at its request; no observed exchange or researcher/public disclosure follows.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "C.14 PDF77;oversight additional text scope",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-fromauditor",
      "source": "w33-con-auditrole",
      "target": "w33-con-ankura",
      "label": "may supply already collected evidence to reduce repeated requests",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-decision"
      ],
      "summary": "Trustee may ask auditor and rely on/incorporate material; AliExpress takes reasonably required steps. A permitted route, not an actual request or transfer.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-fromauditor",
        "source": "w33-con-auditrole",
        "target": "w33-con-ankura",
        "label": "may supply already collected evidence to reduce repeated requests",
        "detail": "Trustee may ask auditor and rely on/incorporate material; AliExpress takes reasonably required steps. A permitted route, not an actual request or transfer.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "C.12(iii) PDF76",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-fine",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w33-con-ali",
      "label": "announced a separate EUR550million illegal-product-risk fine",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-07-20",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-fine"
      ],
      "summary": "20July2026official French announcement addresses assessment/mitigation of illegal/dangerous/counterfeit products, separate from2025settled access commitments. Full decision, appeal and payment not obtained; action plan due20October2026. Financial details: value: 550,000,000; currency: EUR; kind: announced administrative fine; not observed payment; period: 20July2026announcement Payment status: Unknown; not an access-related fine",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-fine",
        "source": "european-commission",
        "target": "w33-con-ali",
        "label": "announced a separate EUR550million illegal-product-risk fine",
        "detail": "20July2026official French announcement addresses assessment/mitigation of illegal/dangerous/counterfeit products, separate from2025settled access commitments. Full decision, appeal and payment not obtained; action plan due20October2026.",
        "date": "2026-07-20",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Complete French article",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
            "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-fine"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 550,000,000; currency: EUR; kind: announced administrative fine; not observed payment; period: 20July2026announcement"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Unknown; not an access-related fine"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-engagefti",
      "source": "w33-con-alisg",
      "target": "w33-con-fti",
      "label": "reported engaging FTI for the2024/25 audit",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-08-29",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-implementation"
      ],
      "summary": "Provider implementationPDF4 identifies FTIConsultingLLP; auditwork5May–29August2025, adoption29August. Engagement terms and actual paid amount not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-engagefti",
        "source": "w33-con-alisg",
        "target": "w33-con-fti",
        "label": "reported engaging FTI for the2024/25 audit",
        "detail": "Provider implementationPDF4 identifies FTIConsultingLLP; auditwork5May–29August2025, adoption29August. Engagement terms and actual paid amount not acquired.",
        "date": "2025-08-29",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF4",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-implementation"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-ftiopinion",
      "source": "w33-con-fti",
      "target": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
      "label": "issued a positive40(12) readiness conclusion",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Auditor concludes intention/capability and no recommendation, supported by documents/attestations/interviews and substantive electronic-process tests. No fresh replication/workpaper audit.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-ftiopinion",
        "source": "w33-con-fti",
        "target": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
        "label": "issued a positive40(12) readiness conclusion",
        "detail": "Auditor concludes intention/capability and no recommendation, supported by documents/attestations/interviews and substantive electronic-process tests. No fresh replication/workpaper audit.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF295–297",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-noapprovals",
      "source": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
      "target": "w33-con-appcohort",
      "label": "reports zero approvals and all inspected applications incomplete or invalid",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Request count redacted. FTI expressly says it inspected all applications against submitted information, not merely zero approvals. Public record establishes neither wrongful refusals nor delivered access.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-noapprovals",
        "source": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
        "target": "w33-con-appcohort",
        "label": "reports zero approvals and all inspected applications incomplete or invalid",
        "detail": "Request count redacted. FTI expressly says it inspected all applications against submitted information, not merely zero approvals. Public record establishes neither wrongful refusals nor delivered access.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF296",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-legalprocess",
      "source": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
      "target": "w33-con-legalteam",
      "label": "describes Legal-managed eligibility and clarification workflow",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "SOP covers evaluation/amendment/communication; staff use40(8)(b)–(e), standardized replies. Approved dashboard/API datasets described conditionally. SOP and application files not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-legalprocess",
        "source": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
        "target": "w33-con-legalteam",
        "label": "describes Legal-managed eligibility and clarification workflow",
        "detail": "SOP covers evaluation/amendment/communication; staff use40(8)(b)–(e), standardized replies. Approved dashboard/API datasets described conditionally. SOP and application files not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF295–296",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-staffdecisions",
      "source": "w33-con-legalteam",
      "target": "w33-con-appcohort",
      "label": "is reported as managing the tracked review process",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-audit"
      ],
      "summary": "Dated audit-period account; no current2026 terms inferred. Clarification capability is not evidence each applicant received a fair cure opportunity.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-staffdecisions",
        "source": "w33-con-legalteam",
        "target": "w33-con-appcohort",
        "label": "is reported as managing the tracked review process",
        "detail": "Dated audit-period account; no current2026 terms inferred. Clarification capability is not evidence each applicant received a fair cure opportunity.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF296",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-audit"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-gdilink",
      "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "target": "w33-con-collab",
      "label": "links readers to the DSA40 Collaboratory",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch",
        "w33-con-s-entry"
      ],
      "summary": "Actual anchor in retained20April2026GDI article establishes a public referral, not membership, funding, authorship of classifications or identity of the AliExpress applicant.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-gdilink",
        "source": "w32-gdi-gdi",
        "target": "w33-con-collab",
        "label": "links readers to the DSA40 Collaboratory",
        "detail": "Actual anchor in retained20April2026GDI article establishes a public referral, not membership, funding, authorship of classifications or identity of the AliExpress applicant.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "applications manifest source_ancestry: observed anchor/href",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch",
          "w33-con-s-entry"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-runs",
      "source": "w33-con-collab",
      "target": "w33-con-tracker",
      "label": "collects voluntary application reports and publishes summaries",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-08",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-entry",
        "w33-con-s-paper",
        "w33-con-s-tracker"
      ],
      "summary": "Self-reporting/support mission, no complete population frame or public original-decision set. Tracker updated8September2026.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-runs",
        "source": "w33-con-collab",
        "target": "w33-con-tracker",
        "label": "collects voluntary application reports and publishes summaries",
        "detail": "Self-reporting/support mission, no complete population frame or public original-decision set. Tracker updated8September2026.",
        "date": "2026-09-08",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "PaperPDF35;entry andTrackerInsights",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-entry",
          "w33-con-s-paper",
          "w33-con-s-tracker"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes",
      "source": "w33-con-tracker",
      "target": "w33-con-applicants",
      "label": "reports application statuses with unreconciled denominators",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-tracker",
        "w33-con-s-entry"
      ],
      "summary": "70headline/68table and61homepagepublic/60tablepublic8nonpublic retained. 24accepted/27rejected agree betweenheadline/table;17open table. No rates/generalization or inferred missing cases.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes",
        "source": "w33-con-tracker",
        "target": "w33-con-applicants",
        "label": "reports application statuses with unreconciled denominators",
        "detail": "70headline/68table and61homepagepublic/60tablepublic8nonpublic retained. 24accepted/27rejected agree betweenheadline/table;17open table. No rates/generalization or inferred missing cases.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Entire substantive tracker and HTML table;root-reading arithmetic",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-tracker",
          "w33-con-s-entry"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-alientry",
      "source": "w33-con-tracker",
      "target": "w33-con-aliopen",
      "label": "lists one AliExpress public-data entry as open",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-tracker"
      ],
      "summary": "No submission date, identity, original exchange or exactArticle40paragraph. It cannot be matched to GDI or confidential audit applications.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-alientry",
        "source": "w33-con-tracker",
        "target": "w33-con-aliopen",
        "label": "lists one AliExpress public-data entry as open",
        "detail": "No submission date, identity, original exchange or exactArticle40paragraph. It cannot be matched to GDI or confidential audit applications.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Platform/status table AliExpress row",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-tracker"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-aliprovider",
      "source": "w33-con-aliopen",
      "target": "w33-con-ali",
      "label": "names the platform counterpart",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-tracker"
      ],
      "summary": "Public table platform identification only; no established recipient organisation, application merits or delivery date.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-aliprovider",
        "source": "w33-con-aliopen",
        "target": "w33-con-ali",
        "label": "names the platform counterpart",
        "detail": "Public table platform identification only; no established recipient organisation, application merits or delivery date.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Platform/status table",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-tracker"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-reasons",
      "source": "w33-con-tracker",
      "target": "w33-con-applicants",
      "label": "publishes partial reported refusal categories and organiser assessments",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-tracker"
      ],
      "summary": "Counts5purpose,2necessity/proportionality,1incomplete,1mismatch,1affiliation,2EUlocation sum12 not27refusals; overlap/coverage unknown. Organiser calls latter2categories invalid, not an adjudication.27application-text submissions and12Article34mentions are different denominators.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-reasons",
        "source": "w33-con-tracker",
        "target": "w33-con-applicants",
        "label": "publishes partial reported refusal categories and organiser assessments",
        "detail": "Counts5purpose,2necessity/proportionality,1incomplete,1mismatch,1affiliation,2EUlocation sum12 not27refusals; overlap/coverage unknown. Organiser calls latter2categories invalid, not an adjudication.27application-text submissions and12Article34mentions are different denominators.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Reasons for Rejection and application-text paragraphs",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-tracker"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-support",
      "source": "w33-con-collab",
      "target": "w33-con-applicants",
      "label": "offers application support and recruits submitted experiences",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper",
        "w33-con-s-entry"
      ],
      "summary": "PaperPDF35 and entry show support plus self-report collection and policy engagement; not an independent audit of every platform decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-support",
        "source": "w33-con-collab",
        "target": "w33-con-applicants",
        "label": "offers application support and recruits submitted experiences",
        "detail": "PaperPDF35 and entry show support plus self-report collection and policy engagement; not an independent audit of every platform decision.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "PaperPDF35;entry mission",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper",
          "w33-con-s-entry"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-paperbasis",
      "source": "w33-con-collab",
      "target": "w33-con-paper14",
      "label": "supplies network experience for an author-led study",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Some authors lead the Collaboratory; no assertion everyauthor/currentteammember has identical governance rights. Application obstacles are datedreportedaccounts, not original letters.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-paperbasis",
        "source": "w33-con-collab",
        "target": "w33-con-paper14",
        "label": "supplies network experience for an author-led study",
        "detail": "Some authors lead the Collaboratory; no assertion everyauthor/currentteammember has identical governance rights. Application obstacles are datedreportedaccounts, not original letters.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "PDF2,12–13,35",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-mercator",
      "source": "w33-con-mercator",
      "target": "w33-con-collab",
      "label": "is disclosed as funding the joint project since early2024",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Since early2024 as described inSeptember2025 paper; no precise award/payment interval.",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "No amount, legalgrantor suffix, contract, actual cash or donor veto disclosed. Currentfunderlogo filename is not extra proof of legalidentity. Payment status: Unknown; funding credit only",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-mercator",
        "source": "w33-con-mercator",
        "target": "w33-con-collab",
        "label": "is disclosed as funding the joint project since early2024",
        "detail": "No amount, legalgrantor suffix, contract, actual cash or donor veto disclosed. Currentfunderlogo filename is not extra proof of legalidentity.",
        "date": "Since early2024 as described inSeptember2025 paper; no precise award/payment interval.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF2 About this paper",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "Unknown; funding credit only"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-bmftr",
      "source": "w33-con-bmftr",
      "target": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
      "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Separate institute-level credit, not allocated to Collaboratory/thisstudy; amount, payment and approval rights unknown.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-bmftr",
        "source": "w33-con-bmftr",
        "target": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
        "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
        "detail": "Separate institute-level credit, not allocated to Collaboratory/thisstudy; amount, payment and approval rights unknown.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF2 About the Weizenbaum Institute",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-berlin",
      "source": "w33-con-berlin",
      "target": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
      "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Same host-credit scope as BMFTR; no common grant or control over tracker coding established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-berlin",
        "source": "w33-con-berlin",
        "target": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
        "label": "is credited with institutional funding",
        "detail": "Same host-credit scope as BMFTR; no common grant or control over tracker coding established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF2",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-paperpublication",
      "source": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
      "target": "w33-con-paper14",
      "label": "publishes the policy paper",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-09-22",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper",
        "w33-con-s-publications"
      ],
      "summary": "September2025cover/imprint; publicationsindex22September2025. Study of earlier implementation, not a new2026population evaluation.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-paperpublication",
        "source": "w33-con-weizenbaum",
        "target": "w33-con-paper14",
        "label": "publishes the policy paper",
        "detail": "September2025cover/imprint; publicationsindex22September2025. Study of earlier implementation, not a new2026population evaluation.",
        "date": "2025-09-22",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Cover/PDF38;publicationindex",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper",
          "w33-con-s-publications"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-resourcesproposal",
      "source": "w33-con-paper14",
      "target": "european-commission",
      "label": "advocates guidance and support for researcher intermediaries",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-paper"
      ],
      "summary": "Authors propose guidance/codes and sustained public support. No adopted cure procedure, new grant or API right established by the paper.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-resourcesproposal",
        "source": "w33-con-paper14",
        "target": "european-commission",
        "label": "advocates guidance and support for researcher intermediaries",
        "detail": "Authors propose guidance/codes and sustained public support. No adopted cure procedure, new grant or API right established by the paper.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF12–13,35–36",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-paper"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-issues",
      "source": "w33-con-collab",
      "target": "w33-con-applicants",
      "label": "reports checked practical issues separate from application decisions",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-issues"
      ],
      "summary": "Issuepage lists historicalMeta submission interruptionDec2024–Apr2025 andTikTok data outageJan2025, with no known currentcriticalissues inorganiser scope. No individualAliExpress refusal/cure or incidentlogs acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-issues",
        "source": "w33-con-collab",
        "target": "w33-con-applicants",
        "label": "reports checked practical issues separate from application decisions",
        "detail": "Issuepage lists historicalMeta submission interruptionDec2024–Apr2025 andTikTok data outageJan2025, with no known currentcriticalissues inorganiser scope. No individualAliExpress refusal/cure or incidentlogs acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "Full short issue body",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-issues"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-owcommission",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "w33-con-oliver",
      "label": "is identified as commissioning evaluation through102384",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle",
        "w16-supp-s-foi-release"
      ],
      "summary": "Department inventory identifiesOliverWyman; order supplier fields redacted. VisiblePhaseI108400+PhaseII547600=656000GBPexVAT; tenderprice/firstyearliabilitybasis, not paid funds. Released copy does not establish signatures/execution. Financial details: value: 656,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed tender/contract price excluding VAT; not payment; period: 102384 phasesI/II Payment status: No payment record acquired",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-owcommission",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "w33-con-oliver",
        "label": "is identified as commissioning evaluation through102384",
        "detail": "Department inventory identifiesOliverWyman; order supplier fields redacted. VisiblePhaseI108400+PhaseII547600=656000GBPexVAT; tenderprice/firstyearliabilitybasis, not paid funds. Released copy does not establish signatures/execution.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "Inventorydocument6;PDF88–100,especially93,95–97,100",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle",
          "w16-supp-s-foi-release"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 656,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed tender/contract price excluding VAT; not payment; period: 102384 phasesI/II"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "No payment record acquired"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-evalscope",
      "source": "w33-con-evalcontract",
      "target": "w33-con-evaloutput",
      "label": "commissions process impact correctness and value-for-money evaluation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "Specification includes effectiveness of correctly identifying trends, successes/failures and final report for seniorcivilservants. A/B or experimental approaches conditional, not proof of execution.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-evalscope",
        "source": "w33-con-evalcontract",
        "target": "w33-con-evaloutput",
        "label": "commissions process impact correctness and value-for-money evaluation",
        "detail": "Specification includes effectiveness of correctly identifying trends, successes/failures and final report for seniorcivilservants. A/B or experimental approaches conditional, not proof of execution.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF62–68,88–92",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "w33-con-evalcontract",
      "label": "conditions payment in arrears on satisfactory deliverables",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "Released payment/acceptance terms locate buyer review; no accepted deliverable, invoice approval or payment acquired. Date mismatch and empty signaturefields preserved.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "w33-con-evalcontract",
        "label": "conditions payment in arrears on satisfactory deliverables",
        "detail": "Released payment/acceptance terms locate buyer review; no accepted deliverable, invoice approval or payment acquired. Date mismatch and empty signaturefields preserved.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF93,95–100",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-gatecondition",
      "source": "w33-con-evalcontract",
      "target": "w33-con-fundgate",
      "label": "makes later-phase funding conditional on feasibility assessment",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "Provisional schedule names feasibility report and phase decisions; apparent year inconsistencies retained. Actual subsequent funding decision not acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-gatecondition",
        "source": "w33-con-evalcontract",
        "target": "w33-con-fundgate",
        "label": "makes later-phase funding conditional on feasibility assessment",
        "detail": "Provisional schedule names feasibility report and phase decisions; apparent year inconsistencies retained. Actual subsequent funding decision not acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF88–92,especially92",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-treasurygate",
      "source": "w33-con-treasury",
      "target": "w33-con-fundgate",
      "label": "is assigned approval of subsequent-phase funding",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "Intended HMT officials approval/reporting route, not an exercised veto or identified official decision.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-treasurygate",
        "source": "w33-con-treasury",
        "target": "w33-con-fundgate",
        "label": "is assigned approval of subsequent-phase funding",
        "detail": "Intended HMT officials approval/reporting route, not an exercised veto or identified official decision.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF62,68,92",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-pilotfunding",
      "source": "w33-con-treasury",
      "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "announced GBP8.4million pilot funding",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-round2"
      ],
      "summary": "SharedOutcomesFundRound2CDDP entry namesDCMS,FCDO,HomeOffice,CabinetOffice,MOD,GCHQ,NCSC participation. No proof each supplied data or controlled platform; do not add to supplierprices. Financial details: value: 8,400,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pilot funding; no recipient-payment ledger; period: Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 Payment status: No supplier allocation/disbursement established",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-pilotfunding",
        "source": "w33-con-treasury",
        "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "label": "announced GBP8.4million pilot funding",
        "detail": "SharedOutcomesFundRound2CDDP entry namesDCMS,FCDO,HomeOffice,CabinetOffice,MOD,GCHQ,NCSC participation. No proof each supplied data or controlled platform; do not add to supplierprices.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "PDF9/printed6 CDDP entry",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-round2"
        ],
        "facts": [
          {
            "label": "Financial details",
            "text": "value: 8,400,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pilot funding; no recipient-payment ledger; period: Shared Outcomes Fund Round2"
          },
          {
            "label": "Payment status",
            "text": "No supplier allocation/disbursement established"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-publicidentity",
      "source": "w33-con-publiclegal",
      "target": "w33-con-public",
      "label": "is identified as the current website controller",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "As of January2026 notice; exact beginning/end of controller role unknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-publicprivacy",
        "w33-con-s-publiccompany"
      ],
      "summary": "January2026privacyidentity plus registryoverview; no inference this entity contracted on historicalCDDP.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-publicidentity",
        "source": "w33-con-publiclegal",
        "target": "w33-con-public",
        "label": "is identified as the current website controller",
        "detail": "January2026privacyidentity plus registryoverview; no inference this entity contracted on historicalCDDP.",
        "date": "As of January2026 notice; exact beginning/end of controller role unknown.",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Privacyheading/controller;CH10608507overview",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-publicprivacy",
          "w33-con-s-publiccompany"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-publiccddp",
      "source": "w33-con-public",
      "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
      "label": "reports participation in delivery",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-publicclaim"
      ],
      "summary": "Undated supplier article namesCDDP among3SOFprojects. Exactwork,commission,fee,legalentity and acceptancedeliverable unknown. OSDIconsortium cannot fill those gaps.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-publiccddp",
        "source": "w33-con-public",
        "target": "w16-supp-cddp",
        "label": "reports participation in delivery",
        "detail": "Undated supplier article namesCDDP among3SOFprojects. Exactwork,commission,fee,legalentity and acceptancedeliverable unknown. OSDIconsortium cannot fill those gaps.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Full substantive supplier article CDDPparagraph",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-publicclaim"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-subapproval",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "w33-con-subapproval",
      "label": "provides written approval through the order-form mechanism",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
      ],
      "summary": "102548PDF120 says entry grants approval for listedkeysubcontractors; identities redacted. Separate102887NotApplicable field does not resolve this list. No PUBLICsubcontractedge.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-subapproval",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "w33-con-subapproval",
        "label": "provides written approval through the order-form mechanism",
        "detail": "102548PDF120 says entry grants approval for listedkeysubcontractors; identities redacted. Separate102887NotApplicable field does not resolve this list. No PUBLICsubcontractedge.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "PDF114–122,especially120;180–181,186",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-chairs",
      "source": "w33-con-cdei",
      "target": "w33-con-expertgroup",
      "label": "convened and chaired the expert group",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-07-02",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-cdei"
      ],
      "summary": "Datedofficialaccount; specified advisoryrole, not currentstandingdelegation or procurementvote.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-chairs",
        "source": "w33-con-cdei",
        "target": "w33-con-expertgroup",
        "label": "convened and chaired the expert group",
        "detail": "Datedofficialaccount; specified advisoryrole, not currentstandingdelegation or procurementvote.",
        "date": "2021-07-02",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Full2July2021article/roster",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-cdei"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-woodgroup",
      "source": "w12-gov-wood",
      "target": "w33-con-expertgroup",
      "label": "was listed as Reset Tech Senior Advisor in the group",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-07-02",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-cdei"
      ],
      "summary": "July2021professionalrole is a concreteadvisoryroute; laterResetUKdirectorship separate. No currentemployment,procurementvote,datacontrol or deploymentveto inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-woodgroup",
        "source": "w12-gov-wood",
        "target": "w33-con-expertgroup",
        "label": "was listed as Reset Tech Senior Advisor in the group",
        "detail": "July2021professionalrole is a concreteadvisoryroute; laterResetUKdirectorship separate. No currentemployment,procurementvote,datacontrol or deploymentveto inferred.",
        "date": "2021-07-02",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "personnel",
        "evidence": "2July2021roster PoppyWood entry",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-cdei"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-advises",
      "source": "w33-con-expertgroup",
      "target": "w33-con-osdi",
      "label": "advises scope direction and legally robust data stewardship",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-cdei"
      ],
      "summary": "Government says group had encouraged userexperience emphasis; actualminutes,whichadvice accepted and approvalinstrument not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-advises",
        "source": "w33-con-expertgroup",
        "target": "w33-con-osdi",
        "label": "advises scope direction and legally robust data stewardship",
        "detail": "Government says group had encouraged userexperience emphasis; actualminutes,whichadvice accepted and approvalinstrument not obtained.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Article remit and input account",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-cdei"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-discovery",
      "source": "w33-con-osdi",
      "target": "w33-con-longlist",
      "label": "published candidate solutions from discovery input",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-06-02",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-longlist"
      ],
      "summary": "Discoveryinterviews,OSTIAworkshops andWhitehallroundtable;23candidate solutions awaitedshortlisting. No individualproposalacceptance or bindingtaxonomy.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-discovery",
        "source": "w33-con-osdi",
        "target": "w33-con-longlist",
        "label": "published candidate solutions from discovery input",
        "detail": "Discoveryinterviews,OSTIAworkshops andWhitehallroundtable;23candidate solutions awaitedshortlisting. No individualproposalacceptance or bindingtaxonomy.",
        "date": "2021-06-02",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "2June2021longlist account",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-longlist"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-facultyosdi",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "target": "w33-con-osdi",
      "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
        "w33-con-s-pa"
      ],
      "summary": "Officialdescription/PAaccount namesFaculty/PUBLICconsortium; no CDDPcontractorcrosswalk or project-specificcash inferred.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-facultyosdi",
        "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
        "target": "w33-con-osdi",
        "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
        "detail": "Officialdescription/PAaccount namesFaculty/PUBLICconsortium; no CDDPcontractorcrosswalk or project-specificcash inferred.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Officialprogramme/evaluatorbody",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
          "w33-con-s-pa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
      "source": "w33-con-public",
      "target": "w33-con-osdi",
      "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
        "w33-con-s-pa"
      ],
      "summary": "Same official OSDIconsortium; scope andsupplieridentity notproofPUBLICheldredactedCDDPsubcontract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
        "source": "w33-con-public",
        "target": "w33-con-osdi",
        "label": "is named in the delivery consortium",
        "detail": "Same official OSDIconsortium; scope andsupplieridentity notproofPUBLICheldredactedCDDPsubcontract.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "Officialprogramme/evaluatorbody",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI official programme description",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
          "w33-con-s-pa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
      "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "target": "pa-consulting",
      "label": "appointed PA as external OSDI evaluator",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2021-09-23",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-pa"
      ],
      "summary": "23September2021deliverylead account describes assurance of process/resources/spending/quality andseniorcivilservantreporting. No originalscopeagreement/finalassessment acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
        "source": "w16-supp-dcms",
        "target": "pa-consulting",
        "label": "appointed PA as external OSDI evaluator",
        "detail": "23September2021deliverylead account describes assurance of process/resources/spending/quality andseniorcivilservantreporting. No originalscopeagreement/finalassessment acquired.",
        "date": "2021-09-23",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "Entireappointmentarticle",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-pa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-jointscope",
      "source": "pa-consulting",
      "target": "w33-con-osdi",
      "label": "had responsibilities and priorities agreed with government and consortium",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-pa"
      ],
      "summary": "Governmentaccount saysDCMS agreedwithPA incollaborationwithFaculty/PUBLIC. This is described processagreement, not unilateral supplierapproval or acquiredcontract.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-jointscope",
        "source": "pa-consulting",
        "target": "w33-con-osdi",
        "label": "had responsibilities and priorities agreed with government and consortium",
        "detail": "Governmentaccount saysDCMS agreedwithPA incollaborationwithFaculty/PUBLIC. This is described processagreement, not unilateral supplierapproval or acquiredcontract.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "Evaluator workingrelationshipsection",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-pa"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
      "source": "w33-con-public",
      "target": "w33-con-sandbox",
      "label": "reports delivering a TRL4 prototype for DCMS review and testing",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-sandbox"
      ],
      "summary": "Commercialcase study claimsdataset/framework/DPIA/3pilotfirms/userguidance; finalstageproposesliveoperation. No originalframework,pilotresults or acceptancecertificate acquired.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
        "source": "w33-con-public",
        "target": "w33-con-sandbox",
        "label": "reports delivering a TRL4 prototype for DCMS review and testing",
        "detail": "Commercialcase study claimsdataset/framework/DPIA/3pilotfirms/userguidance; finalstageproposesliveoperation. No originalframework,pilotresults or acceptancecertificate acquired.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "infrastructure",
        "evidence": "FinalPDF13",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-sandbox"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-sandboxprogramme",
      "source": "w33-con-sandbox",
      "target": "w33-con-osdi",
      "label": "is identified as the programme case study",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-sandbox",
        "w33-con-s-longlist"
      ],
      "summary": "PUBLICproduct-evaluation strand separate fromPAprogrammeassurance; reported200plusinterviews/3roundtables broader period thanearly70discoveryinterviews, notsummed.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-sandboxprogramme",
        "source": "w33-con-sandbox",
        "target": "w33-con-osdi",
        "label": "is identified as the programme case study",
        "detail": "PUBLICproduct-evaluation strand separate fromPAprogrammeassurance; reported200plusinterviews/3roundtables broader period thanearly70discoveryinterviews, notsummed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "coordination",
        "evidence": "GCloudPDF13;discoveryaccount",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-sandbox",
          "w33-con-s-longlist"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-stcfcommission",
      "source": "w33-con-public",
      "target": "w33-con-stcf",
      "label": "authored a separately DSIT-commissioned evaluation",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "CommissionFebruary2024; reportOctober2024, exactdaysunknown.",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-stcf"
      ],
      "summary": "Report sayscommissionFebruary2024 andcoverOctober2024. No commissionprice/payment/legalentity asserted.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-stcfcommission",
        "source": "w33-con-public",
        "target": "w33-con-stcf",
        "label": "authored a separately DSIT-commissioned evaluation",
        "detail": "Report sayscommissionFebruary2024 andcoverOctober2024. No commissionprice/payment/legalentity asserted.",
        "date": "CommissionFebruary2024; reportOctober2024, exactdaysunknown.",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "PDF1–3",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-stcf"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-methodreuse",
      "source": "w33-con-osdi",
      "target": "w33-con-stcf",
      "label": "is expressly credited as a source of evaluation practices",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "",
      "sources": [
        "w33-con-s-stcf"
      ],
      "summary": "PUBLICcreditsOSDIalongsideotherinputs; criteria includeperformance,robustness,scalability,privacy/security,userfeedback. OriginalOSDIframework notlinked, footnote17homepageonly.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-methodreuse",
        "source": "w33-con-osdi",
        "target": "w33-con-stcf",
        "label": "is expressly credited as a source of evaluation practices",
        "detail": "PUBLICcreditsOSDIalongsideotherinputs; criteria includeperformance,robustness,scalability,privacy/security,userfeedback. OriginalOSDIframework notlinked, footnote17homepageonly.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "reported",
        "type": "narrative",
        "evidence": "PDF10,33/printed32",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-stcf"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-e-landscapework",
      "source": "w33-con-public",
      "target": "w33-con-landscape",
      "label": "produced a DSIT-commissioned sector study",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "unspecified",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-03-26",
      "sources": [
        "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4"
      ],
      "summary": "Published26March2026; appendix describes targetedstakeholdertracker/scripts/affinitymap notacquired. Acknowledgement doesnotimplyeachrespondent answeredallquestions.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-e-landscapework",
        "source": "w33-con-public",
        "target": "w33-con-landscape",
        "label": "produced a DSIT-commissioned sector study",
        "detail": "Published26March2026; appendix describes targetedstakeholdertracker/scripts/affinitymap notacquired. Acknowledgement doesnotimplyeachrespondent answeredallquestions.",
        "date": "2026-03-26",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "Introduction/method/appendix",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-ca-connor",
      "source": "leahy",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "US executive director (published roster)",
      "family": "people",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "src-e07be722d815"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "The published role does not establish control outside its stated scope. The separate US legal entity remains controlaius; the original US-role record is e91. This roster statement does not merge the organisations.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-ca-connor",
          "source": "leahy",
          "target": "controlai",
          "label": "US executive director (published roster)",
          "family": "people",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "src-e07be722d815"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "The published role does not establish control outside its stated scope. The separate US legal entity remains controlaius; the original US-role record is e91. This roster statement does not merge the organisations.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-el-connor",
      "source": "leahy",
      "target": "ed2-eleutherai",
      "label": "co-founded",
      "family": "people",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-conjecture-about"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Founding is historical, not proof of present ownership.",
      "eventDate": "2020",
      "stage": "historical",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-el-connor",
          "source": "leahy",
          "target": "ed2-eleutherai",
          "label": "co-founded",
          "family": "people",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-conjecture-about"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Founding is historical, not proof of present ownership.",
          "eventDate": "2020",
          "stage": "historical"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-ca-proposal",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "ed2-asi-prohibition",
      "label": "advocates",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-control-home"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "The proposal targets superintelligence; this is not a prohibition on all AI, nor an enacted rule.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "proposed",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-ca-proposal",
          "source": "controlai",
          "target": "ed2-asi-prohibition",
          "label": "advocates",
          "family": "advocacy",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-control-home"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "The proposal targets superintelligence; this is not a prohibition on all AI, nor an enacted rule.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "proposed"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-ca-briefs",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "ed2-uk-lawmakers",
      "label": "says it briefs",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "status": "reported",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-control-home"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Briefing is not adoption. No vote or official action is established here.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-ca-briefs",
          "source": "controlai",
          "target": "ed2-uk-lawmakers",
          "label": "says it briefs",
          "family": "advocacy",
          "status": "reported",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-control-home"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Briefing is not adoption. No vote or official action is established here.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-mc-match",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "operates",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "reported",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-mc-match",
          "source": "mastercard",
          "target": "w30-class-match",
          "label": "operates",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "reported",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-visa-vmss",
      "source": "visa",
      "target": "ed2-vmss",
      "label": "operates",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "reported",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-visa-vmss",
          "source": "visa",
          "target": "ed2-vmss",
          "label": "operates",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "reported",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-acq-match",
      "source": "ed2-acquirers",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "screen and report",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "reported",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-acq-match",
          "source": "ed2-acquirers",
          "target": "w30-class-match",
          "label": "screen and report",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "reported",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-stripe-match",
      "source": "stripe",
      "target": "w30-class-match",
      "label": "uses for screening",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-stripe-match",
          "source": "stripe",
          "target": "w30-class-match",
          "label": "uses for screening",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-stripe-vmss",
      "source": "stripe",
      "target": "ed2-vmss",
      "label": "uses for screening",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-stripe-vmss",
          "source": "stripe",
          "target": "ed2-vmss",
          "label": "uses for screening",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-stripe-merchants",
      "source": "stripe",
      "target": "w30-class-merchants",
      "label": "generally disqualifies",
      "family": "restriction",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Stripe describes exceptions. This is a policy, not an individual merchant’s case.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-stripe-merchants",
          "source": "stripe",
          "target": "w30-class-merchants",
          "label": "generally disqualifies",
          "family": "restriction",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Stripe describes exceptions. This is a policy, not an individual merchant’s case.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-match-correction",
      "source": "w30-class-match",
      "target": "ed2-match-removal",
      "label": "has correction route",
      "family": "recourse",
      "status": "reported",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Removal is conditional, not an unconditional right of appeal. This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-match-correction",
          "source": "w30-class-match",
          "target": "ed2-match-removal",
          "label": "has correction route",
          "family": "recourse",
          "status": "reported",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Removal is conditional, not an unconditional right of appeal. This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-correction-acquirer",
      "source": "ed2-match-removal",
      "target": "ed2-acquirers",
      "label": "routes through listing bank",
      "family": "recourse",
      "status": "reported",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "An error correction and restoration of payment access are different outcomes. This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-correction-acquirer",
          "source": "ed2-match-removal",
          "target": "ed2-acquirers",
          "label": "routes through listing bank",
          "family": "recourse",
          "status": "reported",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "An error correction and restoration of payment access are different outcomes. This record uses Stripe’s account; the relevant card-network rulebook has not been independently checked in this slice.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-osa-ofcom",
      "source": "w7-policy-osa",
      "target": "ofcom",
      "label": "implemented by",
      "family": "authority",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "This edge records the regulator’s January 2025 account, not every provision of the Act.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-osa-ofcom",
          "source": "w7-policy-osa",
          "target": "ofcom",
          "label": "implemented by",
          "family": "authority",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "This edge records the regulator’s January 2025 account, not every provision of the Act.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-ofcom-guidance",
      "source": "ofcom",
      "target": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "label": "publishes guidance on",
      "family": "authority",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "",
      "eventDate": "2025-01-16",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-ofcom-guidance",
          "source": "ofcom",
          "target": "ed2-age-assurance",
          "label": "publishes guidance on",
          "family": "authority",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "",
          "eventDate": "2025-01-16",
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-services-checks",
      "source": "ed2-covered-services",
      "target": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "label": "must implement in scope",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Requirements differ by service category. This is not a mandate for every website.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-services-checks",
          "source": "ed2-covered-services",
          "target": "ed2-age-assurance",
          "label": "must implement in scope",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Requirements differ by service category. This is not a mandate for every website.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-checks-users",
      "source": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "target": "ed2-adult-users",
      "label": "conditions access for",
      "family": "restriction",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Ofcom also specifies privacy protection and adult access to lawful material.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-checks-users",
          "source": "ed2-age-assurance",
          "target": "ed2-adult-users",
          "label": "conditions access for",
          "family": "restriction",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Ofcom also specifies privacy protection and adult access to lawful material.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-checks-id",
      "source": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "target": "ed2-photo-id",
      "label": "can use",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "One possible method, not a universal identity-document requirement.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-checks-id",
          "source": "ed2-age-assurance",
          "target": "ed2-photo-id",
          "label": "can use",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "One possible method, not a universal identity-document requirement.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-checks-estimate",
      "source": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "target": "ed2-age-estimate",
      "label": "can use",
      "family": "implementation",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "Age estimation is distinct from identifying a person.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-checks-estimate",
          "source": "ed2-age-assurance",
          "target": "ed2-age-estimate",
          "label": "can use",
          "family": "implementation",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-ofcom-age"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "Age estimation is distinct from identifying a person.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-yt-publishes",
      "source": "ed2-youtube",
      "target": "ed2-yt-policy",
      "label": "publishes",
      "family": "authority",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-youtube-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-yt-publishes",
          "source": "ed2-youtube",
          "target": "ed2-yt-policy",
          "label": "publishes",
          "family": "authority",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-youtube-policy"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-yt-applies",
      "source": "ed2-yt-policy",
      "target": "ed2-yt-access",
      "label": "sets conditions for",
      "family": "restriction",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-youtube-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "The full policy includes educational and public-interest contexts.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-yt-applies",
          "source": "ed2-yt-policy",
          "target": "ed2-yt-access",
          "label": "sets conditions for",
          "family": "restriction",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-youtube-policy"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "The full policy includes educational and public-interest contexts.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-yt-gates",
      "source": "ed2-yt-access",
      "target": "ed2-yt-viewers",
      "label": "requires age and sign-in",
      "family": "restriction",
      "status": "documented",
      "directed": true,
      "sources": [
        "ed2-source-youtube-policy"
      ],
      "summary": "",
      "limit": "This concerns age-restricted material, not every video.",
      "eventDate": null,
      "stage": "recorded",
      "_raw": {
        "edition": "Editorial v2 source-checked supplement",
        "record": {
          "id": "ed2-yt-gates",
          "source": "ed2-yt-access",
          "target": "ed2-yt-viewers",
          "label": "requires age and sign-in",
          "family": "restriction",
          "status": "documented",
          "directed": true,
          "sources": [
            "ed2-source-youtube-policy"
          ],
          "summary": "",
          "limit": "This concerns age-restricted material, not every video.",
          "eventDate": null,
          "stage": "recorded"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-001",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Consulted on announced framework",
      "summary": "ControlAI publicly states it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework.",
      "limit": "Self-attributed participation; no staff correspondence, contract, individual drafter, exact clauses, or sole authorship established. The group's narrower position differs from the framework's advanced-AI pause. Consulting legal entity and payment not identified.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Public account 2026-09-09; exact consultation dates not established",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-002"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-001",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "Consulted on announced framework",
        "summary": "ControlAI publicly states it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework.",
        "limit": "Self-attributed participation; no staff correspondence, contract, individual drafter, exact clauses, or sole authorship established. The group's narrower position differs from the framework's advanced-AI pause. Consulting legal entity and payment not identified.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Public account 2026-09-09; exact consultation dates not established",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-002"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-004",
      "source": "w34-sanders-hinton",
      "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "label": "Discussed AI risk",
      "summary": "Sanders's February 4 announcement says Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans.",
      "limit": "Recipient's public account; no exact meeting date, payment, contract, or formal advisory title.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-02-04",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-009"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-004",
        "source": "w34-sanders-hinton",
        "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "label": "Discussed AI risk",
        "summary": "Sanders's February 4 announcement says Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans.",
        "limit": "Recipient's public account; no exact meeting date, payment, contract, or formal advisory title.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-02-04",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-009"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-005",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "label": "Convened public AI-risk panel",
      "summary": "Sanders brought together US/China AI scientists in an April 29 Capitol discussion.",
      "limit": "Official page establishes event purpose; dated reporting identifies completed occurrence. Event is distinct from September proposal work.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-010",
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-005",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
        "label": "Convened public AI-risk panel",
        "summary": "Sanders brought together US/China AI scientists in an April 29 Capitol discussion.",
        "limit": "Official page establishes event purpose; dated reporting identifies completed occurrence. Event is distinct from September proposal work.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-010",
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-006",
      "source": "tegmark",
      "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
      "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Max Tegmark as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
      "limit": "Public participation; no drafting, payment or official regulatory authority established.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-006",
        "source": "tegmark",
        "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
        "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
        "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Max Tegmark as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
        "limit": "Public participation; no drafting, payment or official regulatory authority established.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-007",
      "source": "w34-sanders-david-krueger",
      "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
      "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies David Krueger as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
      "limit": "Public discussion alone does not establish work on the September bill.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-007",
        "source": "w34-sanders-david-krueger",
        "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
        "label": "Participated in AI-risk panel",
        "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies David Krueger as a participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
        "limit": "Public discussion alone does not establish work on the September bill.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-008",
      "source": "w34-sanders-zeng-yi",
      "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
      "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Zeng Yi as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
      "limit": "No claim of funding, direction of Sanders, drafting, or official bilateral agreement.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-008",
        "source": "w34-sanders-zeng-yi",
        "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
        "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
        "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Zeng Yi as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
        "limit": "No claim of funding, direction of Sanders, drafting, or official bilateral agreement.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-009",
      "source": "w34-sanders-xue-lan",
      "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
      "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
      "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Xue Lan as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
      "limit": "No claim of funding, direction of Sanders, drafting, or official bilateral agreement.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-009",
        "source": "w34-sanders-xue-lan",
        "target": "w34-sanders-april-panel",
        "label": "Participated remotely in AI-risk panel",
        "summary": "Contemporaneous reporting identifies Xue Lan as a remote participant in Sanders's April 29 panel.",
        "limit": "No claim of funding, direction of Sanders, drafting, or official bilateral agreement.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-04-29",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-011"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-010",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
      "label": "Invited senators to expert meeting",
      "summary": "Sanders's CNN interview says he invited every senator to meet experts concerning AI risks.",
      "limit": "Preview only. CNN rush transcript's Thursday reference differs from Axios date; exact invitation letter not obtained; attendance not established.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16 per Axios; primary transcript says Thursday",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-013",
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-010",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
        "label": "Invited senators to expert meeting",
        "summary": "Sanders's CNN interview says he invited every senator to meet experts concerning AI risks.",
        "limit": "Preview only. CNN rush transcript's Thursday reference differs from Axios date; exact invitation letter not obtained; attendance not established.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16 per Axios; primary transcript says Thursday",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-013",
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-011",
      "source": "tegmark",
      "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
      "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
      "summary": "Axios identifies Tegmark among planned expert participants.",
      "limit": "Scheduled participation reported; completed attendance and bill drafting unverified.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-011",
        "source": "tegmark",
        "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
        "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
        "summary": "Axios identifies Tegmark among planned expert participants.",
        "limit": "Scheduled participation reported; completed attendance and bill drafting unverified.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-012",
      "source": "w34-sanders-hinton",
      "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
      "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
      "summary": "Axios identifies Hinton among planned expert participants.",
      "limit": "Secondary preview; no completed attendance or bill-drafting appointment established.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-012",
        "source": "w34-sanders-hinton",
        "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
        "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
        "summary": "Axios identifies Hinton among planned expert participants.",
        "limit": "Secondary preview; no completed attendance or bill-drafting appointment established.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-013",
      "source": "w34-sanders-cotra",
      "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
      "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
      "summary": "Axios identifies Cotra among planned expert participants.",
      "limit": "Secondary preview; no completed attendance or bill-drafting appointment established.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-013",
        "source": "w34-sanders-cotra",
        "target": "w34-sanders-september-briefing",
        "label": "Reported scheduled participant",
        "summary": "Axios identifies Cotra among planned expert participants.",
        "limit": "Secondary preview; no completed attendance or bill-drafting appointment established.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-09; 2026-09-16",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-003"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-014",
      "source": "w34-sanders-cotra",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Staff researcher and investigation coauthor",
      "summary": "METR's August 26 report identifies Ajeya Cotra as a staff member and coauthor of its investigation.",
      "limit": "Primary organizational account; this branch did not evaluate the full technical report. METR says OpenAI did not pay for the assessment.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-26",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-008"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-014",
        "source": "w34-sanders-cotra",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Staff researcher and investigation coauthor",
        "summary": "METR's August 26 report identifies Ajeya Cotra as a staff member and coauthor of its investigation.",
        "limit": "Primary organizational account; this branch did not evaluate the full technical report. METR says OpenAI did not pay for the assessment.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-26",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-008"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-015",
      "source": "tegmark",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Founder and Chair",
      "summary": "FLI's current roster names Max Tegmark Founder and Chair.",
      "limit": "Institutional role is distinct from the capacity in which he participates in a particular briefing.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-012"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-e-015",
        "source": "tegmark",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Founder and Chair",
        "summary": "FLI's current roster names Max Tegmark Founder and Chair.",
        "limit": "Institutional role is distinct from the capacity in which he participates in a particular briefing.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-012"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-e-principal-committee",
      "source": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
      "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "label": "designated principal Senate campaign committee",
      "summary": "Bernard Sanders's January 20, 2025 Form 2 designates Friends of Bernie Sanders (FEC C00411330) for the 2030 Senate election. The current FEC committee overview reports separately bounded 2025–2026 finances through June 30, 2026.",
      "limit": "Principal campaign authority, not evidence that the campaign financed the bill, paid ControlAI, or received money from any named AI-safety donor or foundation.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2025-01-20; current reporting snapshot observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-fin-s-form2",
        "w34-sanders-fin-s-candidate",
        "w34-sanders-fin-s-committee"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-e-principal-committee",
        "source": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
        "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "label": "designated principal Senate campaign committee",
        "summary": "Bernard Sanders's January 20, 2025 Form 2 designates Friends of Bernie Sanders (FEC C00411330) for the 2030 Senate election. The current FEC committee overview reports separately bounded 2025–2026 finances through June 30, 2026.",
        "limit": "Principal campaign authority, not evidence that the campaign financed the bill, paid ControlAI, or received money from any named AI-safety donor or foundation.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2025-01-20; current reporting snapshot observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-fin-s-form2",
          "w34-sanders-fin-s-candidate",
          "w34-sanders-fin-s-committee"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-01",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
      "summary": "Casar joined Sanders in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
      "limit": "An announcement does not establish formal introduction, enactment or votes.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-001"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-01",
        "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
        "summary": "Casar joined Sanders in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
        "limit": "An announcement does not establish formal introduction, enactment or votes.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-001"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-02",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
      "summary": "Sanders joined Casar in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
      "limit": "The source records an announcement of forthcoming legislation, not enactment.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-001"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-02",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "Jointly announces forthcoming legislation",
        "summary": "Sanders joined Casar in announcing the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on September 3.",
        "limit": "The source records an announcement of forthcoming legislation, not enactment.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-001"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-03",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "w34-sanders-cpc",
      "label": "Chairs",
      "summary": "CPC's current roster identifies Casar as chair.",
      "limit": "Leadership does not mean the caucus has adopted this bill.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-04"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-03",
        "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "target": "w34-sanders-cpc",
        "label": "Chairs",
        "summary": "CPC's current roster identifies Casar as chair.",
        "limit": "Leadership does not mean the caucus has adopted this bill.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-04"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-04",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w34-sanders-cpc",
      "label": "Senate member",
      "summary": "CPC's roster lists Sanders as its Senate member.",
      "limit": "Membership does not establish endorsements by other members.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-04"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-04",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w34-sanders-cpc",
        "label": "Senate member",
        "summary": "CPC's roster lists Sanders as its Senate member.",
        "limit": "Membership does not establish endorsements by other members.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-04"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-05",
      "source": "cdi",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "ITIF publicly opposes",
      "summary": "ITIF published Daniel Castro's criticism of the proposed ban, urging continued AI development alongside safety work.",
      "limit": "Source attributes statement to ITIF. Existing cdi combines CDI and ITIF; do not attribute statement to former CDI fellow Eva Behrens or infer donor direction.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-02"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-05",
        "source": "cdi",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "ITIF publicly opposes",
        "summary": "ITIF published Daniel Castro's criticism of the proposed ban, urging continued AI development alongside safety work.",
        "limit": "Source attributes statement to ITIF. Existing cdi combines CDI and ITIF; do not attribute statement to former CDI fellow Eva Behrens or infer donor direction.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-02"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-06",
      "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Hosts advocacy petition",
      "summary": "Civic Shout hosts a joint-action petition asking Congress to support the exact Sanders-Casar Act.",
      "limit": "No evidence of sponsor-office coordination, number of completed actions, signature delivery or expenditure.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-06",
        "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "label": "Hosts advocacy petition",
        "summary": "Civic Shout hosts a joint-action petition asking Congress to support the exact Sanders-Casar Act.",
        "limit": "No evidence of sponsor-office coordination, number of completed actions, signature delivery or expenditure.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-07",
      "source": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Solicits congressional support",
      "summary": "Petition calls for enactment, planned committee delivery and follow-up letters to members.",
      "limit": "Delivery and letters are promised future actions, not observed completion. Petition's 'introduced' wording is not reliable bill-status evidence.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-07",
        "source": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "Solicits congressional support",
        "summary": "Petition calls for enactment, planned committee delivery and follow-up letters to members.",
        "limit": "Delivery and letters are promised future actions, not observed completion. Petition's 'introduced' wording is not reliable bill-status evidence.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-08",
      "source": "w34-sanders-college-democrats",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Listed campaign participant",
      "summary": "Public joint-action preview names College Democrats of America as a participant.",
      "limit": "Host-reported participation; no direct organizational resolution, recruited-signature count or payment observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-08",
        "source": "w34-sanders-college-democrats",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "label": "Listed campaign participant",
        "summary": "Public joint-action preview names College Democrats of America as a participant.",
        "limit": "Host-reported participation; no direct organizational resolution, recruited-signature count or payment observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-09",
      "source": "w34-sanders-left-click",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Listed campaign participant",
      "summary": "Public joint-action preview names Left Click as a participant.",
      "limit": "Host-reported participation; no direct organization statement or scale established.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-09",
        "source": "w34-sanders-left-click",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "label": "Listed campaign participant",
        "summary": "Public joint-action preview names Left Click as a participant.",
        "limit": "Host-reported participation; no direct organization statement or scale established.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-10",
      "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Offers recruitment advertising credits",
      "summary": "Joint-action preview offers participants $2.25 in ad credits per signature recruited, usable for promotion of their own causes.",
      "limit": "Offer is an incentive mechanism, not proof of credit issuance, cash transfers or actual spend.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-10",
        "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "label": "Offers recruitment advertising credits",
        "summary": "Joint-action preview offers participants $2.25 in ad credits per signature recruited, usable for promotion of their own causes.",
        "limit": "Offer is an incentive mechanism, not proof of credit issuance, cash transfers or actual spend.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-03"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-11",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
      "summary": "Casar's September 2 release says Anthropic answered August requests but withheld logs and sufficient answers; follow-up demanded fuller disclosure by September 15.",
      "limit": "Company correspondence and criticism are established from legislator release; underlying response PDFs not read. No adviser/donor relationship implied.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-02",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-08"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-11",
        "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "target": "anthropic",
        "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
        "summary": "Casar's September 2 release says Anthropic answered August requests but withheld logs and sufficient answers; follow-up demanded fuller disclosure by September 15.",
        "limit": "Company correspondence and criticism are established from legislator release; underlying response PDFs not read. No adviser/donor relationship implied.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-02",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-08"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-12",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
      "summary": "Casar's September 2 release records OpenAI's reply and demands logs plus further security information by September 15.",
      "limit": "This is the legislator’s assessment of the response, not an independent incident audit.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-02",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-08"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-12",
        "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "label": "Demands incident records; receives response",
        "summary": "Casar's September 2 release records OpenAI's reply and demands logs plus further security information by September 15.",
        "limit": "This is the legislator’s assessment of the response, not an independent incident audit.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-02",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-08"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-13",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
      "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
      "summary": "Casar co-led an August 10 letter calling for public hearings with major AI CEOs.",
      "limit": "This letter's signatories are not September ASI-ban cosponsors.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-10",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-06"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-13",
        "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "target": "w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
        "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
        "summary": "Casar co-led an August 10 letter calling for public hearings with major AI CEOs.",
        "limit": "This letter's signatories are not September ASI-ban cosponsors.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-10",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-06"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-14",
      "source": "w34-sanders-delia-ramirez",
      "target": "w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
      "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
      "summary": "Ramirez co-led the call for hearings as relevant House Homeland Security subcommittee ranking member.",
      "limit": "Prior working relationship on oversight, not established support for ASI prohibition.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-10",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-06"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-14",
        "source": "w34-sanders-delia-ramirez",
        "target": "w34-sanders-august-hearings-letter",
        "label": "Co-leads oversight letter",
        "summary": "Ramirez co-led the call for hearings as relevant House Homeland Security subcommittee ranking member.",
        "limit": "Prior working relationship on oversight, not established support for ASI prohibition.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-10",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-06"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-15",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "label": "Introduces separate tax-and-jobs proposal",
      "summary": "Casar, Foushee and Jacobs announced the AI Tax and Work Protection Act, funding jobs through a tax on major AI businesses.",
      "limit": "Separate from March moratorium and September ASI prohibition.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-15",
        "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
        "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
        "label": "Introduces separate tax-and-jobs proposal",
        "summary": "Casar, Foushee and Jacobs announced the AI Tax and Work Protection Act, funding jobs through a tax on major AI businesses.",
        "limit": "Separate from March moratorium and September ASI prohibition.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-16",
      "source": "w34-sanders-aft",
      "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "label": "Named supporter",
      "summary": "AFT is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-16",
        "source": "w34-sanders-aft",
        "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
        "label": "Named supporter",
        "summary": "AFT is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-17",
      "source": "w34-sanders-afscme",
      "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "label": "Named supporter",
      "summary": "AFSCME is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-17",
        "source": "w34-sanders-afscme",
        "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
        "label": "Named supporter",
        "summary": "AFSCME is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-18",
      "source": "w34-sanders-groundwork-action",
      "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "label": "Named supporter",
      "summary": "Groundwork Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-18",
        "source": "w34-sanders-groundwork-action",
        "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
        "label": "Named supporter",
        "summary": "Groundwork Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-19",
      "source": "w34-sanders-demand-progress-action",
      "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
      "label": "Named supporter",
      "summary": "Demand Progress Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
      "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-19",
        "source": "w34-sanders-demand-progress-action",
        "target": "w34-sanders-tax-work-act",
        "label": "Named supporter",
        "summary": "Demand Progress Action is named by Casar's office as supporting the AI Tax and Work Protection Act.",
        "limit": "Endorsement applies to August tax/jobs bill; must not be shown as September ASI-ban support.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-08-07",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-09"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-20",
      "source": "w34-sanders-national-nurses-united",
      "target": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
      "label": "Supports distinct construction moratorium",
      "summary": "NNU lists S.4214, the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, in supported national legislation.",
      "limit": "Distinct Sanders/AOC March measure; support is not portable to September's proposal.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-13",
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-10"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-20",
        "source": "w34-sanders-national-nurses-united",
        "target": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
        "label": "Supports distinct construction moratorium",
        "summary": "NNU lists S.4214, the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, in supported national legislation.",
        "limit": "Distinct Sanders/AOC March measure; support is not portable to September's proposal.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "observed 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-13",
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-10"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-21",
      "source": "w34-sanders-dfp",
      "target": "w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
      "label": "Publishes policy-opinion survey",
      "summary": "Data for Progress published September 4-9 polling on a combined advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown.",
      "limit": "Question tests a description, not complete legislation; no commissioner/funder identified.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-14",
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-15"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-21",
        "source": "w34-sanders-dfp",
        "target": "w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
        "label": "Publishes policy-opinion survey",
        "summary": "Data for Progress published September 4-9 polling on a combined advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown.",
        "limit": "Question tests a description, not complete legislation; no commissioner/funder identified.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-09",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-14",
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-15"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-22",
      "source": "w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Tests selected policy components",
      "summary": "68% of the weighted web-panel sample supported and 25% opposed the policy bundle described in the question.",
      "limit": "Not a legislative coalition, public endorsement of every provision or support measured after respondents saw bill text. Poll omits proposed prison, dissolution, export controls and agency architecture.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-09",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-15"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-22",
        "source": "w34-sanders-pause-ban-poll",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "Tests selected policy components",
        "summary": "68% of the weighted web-panel sample supported and 25% opposed the policy bundle described in the question.",
        "limit": "Not a legislative coalition, public endorsement of every provision or support measured after respondents saw bill text. Poll omits proposed prison, dissolution, export controls and agency architecture.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-09",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-15"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-23",
      "source": "w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
      "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "label": "Publicly opposes breadth",
      "summary": "Marcus opposed permanent unilateral prohibition while supporting the need for regulation and considering a temporary pause.",
      "limit": "His characterization of technical scope is an opinion, not an established interpretation of the eventual statutory text.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-11"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-23",
        "source": "w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
        "target": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "label": "Publicly opposes breadth",
        "summary": "Marcus opposed permanent unilateral prohibition while supporting the need for regulation and considering a temporary pause.",
        "limit": "His characterization of technical scope is an opinion, not an established interpretation of the eventual statutory text.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-11"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-24",
      "source": "w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
      "target": "aguirre",
      "label": "Publicly favors alternative wording",
      "summary": "Marcus's postscript endorsed an Anthony Aguirre formulation allowing narrow tools and conditional development under independent high-assurance review.",
      "limit": "Public textual borrowing, not evidence of co-drafting or a working relationship. Does not establish Aguirre endorsement of September bill.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-11"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-e-24",
        "source": "w34-sanders-gary-marcus",
        "target": "aguirre",
        "label": "Publicly favors alternative wording",
        "summary": "Marcus's postscript endorsed an Anthony Aguirre formulation allowing narrow tools and conditional development under independent high-assurance review.",
        "limit": "Public textual borrowing, not evidence of co-drafting or a working relationship. Does not establish Aguirre endorsement of September bill.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-03",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-11"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-agency",
      "source": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
      "target": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
      "label": "Would create cabinet-level AI regulator",
      "summary": "The sponsor summary proposes a new agency to enforce the ban, monitor frontier AI, supervise capability removal and destruction, and establish rules and review processes needed to end the pause.",
      "limit": "Proposed powers; no operational regulator or enacted authority established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-root-s-summary"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-agency",
        "source": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
        "target": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
        "label": "Would create cabinet-level AI regulator",
        "summary": "The sponsor summary proposes a new agency to enforce the ban, monitor frontier AI, supervise capability removal and destruction, and establish rules and review processes needed to end the pause.",
        "limit": "Proposed powers; no operational regulator or enacted authority established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-root-s-summary"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-board",
      "source": "w34-sanders-proposed-board",
      "target": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
      "label": "Would provide expert advice",
      "summary": "The summary proposes an AI expert board advising the new regulator.",
      "limit": "No members, selection process or conflict rules supplied. Current interlocutors are not appointees.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-root-s-summary"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-board",
        "source": "w34-sanders-proposed-board",
        "target": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
        "label": "Would provide expert advice",
        "summary": "The summary proposes an AI expert board advising the new regulator.",
        "limit": "No members, selection process or conflict rules supplied. Current interlocutors are not appointees.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-root-s-summary"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-draft",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w34-sanders-controlai-draft",
      "label": "Publishes separate discussion draft",
      "summary": "ControlAI publishes an ASI Prohibition Act discussion draft with blank congressional identifiers. Its landing page is dated June24.",
      "limit": "Current mutable PDF inspected September11; not established as Sanders–Casar statutory text or unchanged since June24.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-006",
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-016"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-draft",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "w34-sanders-controlai-draft",
        "label": "Publishes separate discussion draft",
        "summary": "ControlAI publishes an ASI Prohibition Act discussion draft with blank congressional identifiers. Its landing page is dated June24.",
        "limit": "Current mutable PDF inspected September11; not established as Sanders–Casar statutory text or unchanged since June24.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-006",
          "w34-sanders-adv-s-016"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-essay",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
      "label": "Publishes case for AI pause and ban",
      "summary": "Sanders uses expert statements to argue for national and international AI restrictions.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-essay",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
        "label": "Publishes case for AI pause and ban",
        "summary": "Sanders uses expert statements to argue for national and international AI restrictions.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-cotra",
      "source": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
      "target": "w34-sanders-cotra",
      "label": "Cites AI-risk assessment",
      "summary": "Sanders cites Cotra in his public case for legislation.",
      "limit": "Citation does not establish endorsement or drafting.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-cotra",
        "source": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
        "target": "w34-sanders-cotra",
        "label": "Cites AI-risk assessment",
        "summary": "Sanders cites Cotra in his public case for legislation.",
        "limit": "Citation does not establish endorsement or drafting.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-patel",
      "source": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
      "target": "w34-sanders-dwarkesh-patel",
      "label": "Cites account of AI agents",
      "summary": "Sanders cites Patel when presenting the case for a pause.",
      "limit": "Public citation is not a payment or advisory appointment.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-patel",
        "source": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
        "target": "w34-sanders-dwarkesh-patel",
        "label": "Cites account of AI agents",
        "summary": "Sanders cites Patel when presenting the case for a pause.",
        "limit": "Public citation is not a payment or advisory appointment.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-publisher",
      "source": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
      "target": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
      "label": "Credited in publication footer",
      "summary": "The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders.",
      "limit": "Publisher credit does not establish a bill-specific expenditure.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-publisher",
        "source": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
        "target": "w34-sanders-september-essay",
        "label": "Credited in publication footer",
        "summary": "The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders.",
        "limit": "Publisher credit does not establish a bill-specific expenditure.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-root-s-essay"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-march-sanders",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
      "label": "Announces separate March proposal",
      "summary": "Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez announced a distinct data-center construction moratorium proposal in March.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-10"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-march-sanders",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
        "label": "Announces separate March proposal",
        "summary": "Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez announced a distinct data-center construction moratorium proposal in March.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-10"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-march-aoc",
      "source": "w34-sanders-aoc",
      "target": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
      "label": "Jointly announces March proposal",
      "summary": "Ocasio-Cortez joins Sanders on the earlier data-center measure.",
      "limit": "Not evidence of support for September ASI prohibition.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-coal-s-10"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-e-march-aoc",
        "source": "w34-sanders-aoc",
        "target": "w34-sanders-data-center-moratorium",
        "label": "Jointly announces March proposal",
        "summary": "Ocasio-Cortez joins Sanders on the earlier data-center measure.",
        "limit": "Not evidence of support for September ASI prohibition.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 2026-09-11",
        "sources": [
          "w34-sanders-coal-s-10"
        ],
        "recordKind": "Reviewed Sanders research addition; pre-review candidates retained in the campaign vault"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-founder",
      "source": "yudkowsky",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Co-founder, leadership and board",
      "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: co-founder, leadership and board.",
      "limit": "Not current CEO; operational roles separately recorded.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-team"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-founder",
        "source": "yudkowsky",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Co-founder, leadership and board",
        "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: co-founder, leadership and board.",
        "limit": "Not current CEO; operational roles separately recorded.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-team"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-ceo",
      "source": "malo-bourgon",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Chief executive officer",
      "summary": "Malo Bourgon → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: chief executive officer.",
      "limit": "Current website listing.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-team"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-ceo",
        "source": "malo-bourgon",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Chief executive officer",
        "summary": "Malo Bourgon → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: chief executive officer.",
        "limit": "Current website listing.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-team"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-president",
      "source": "nate-soares",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "President",
      "summary": "Nate Soares → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: president.",
      "limit": "Current website listing.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-team"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-president",
        "source": "nate-soares",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "President",
        "summary": "Nate Soares → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: president.",
        "limit": "Current website listing.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-team"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-lw-founder",
      "source": "yudkowsky",
      "target": "lesswrong",
      "label": "Founded in 2009",
      "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → LessWrong: founded in 2009.",
      "limit": "Historical founding does not establish current control.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-lw"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-lw-founder",
        "source": "yudkowsky",
        "target": "lesswrong",
        "label": "Founded in 2009",
        "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → LessWrong: founded in 2009.",
        "limit": "Historical founding does not establish current control.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-lw"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-lw-owner",
      "source": "miri",
      "target": "lesswrong",
      "label": "Historical ownership at founding",
      "summary": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute → LessWrong: historical ownership at founding.",
      "limit": "Historical FAQ account; no present legal-title conclusion.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-lw"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-lw-owner",
        "source": "miri",
        "target": "lesswrong",
        "label": "Historical ownership at founding",
        "summary": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute → LessWrong: historical ownership at founding.",
        "limit": "Historical FAQ account; no present legal-title conclusion.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-lw"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-lightcone-lw",
      "source": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "target": "lesswrong",
      "label": "Operates listed infrastructure",
      "summary": "Lightcone Infrastructure → LessWrong: operates listed infrastructure.",
      "limit": "No Yudkowsky-to-Lightcone control edge.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-lightcone"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-lightcone-lw",
        "source": "lightcone-infrastructure",
        "target": "lesswrong",
        "label": "Operates listed infrastructure",
        "summary": "Lightcone Infrastructure → LessWrong: operates listed infrastructure.",
        "limit": "No Yudkowsky-to-Lightcone control edge.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-lightcone"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-book-yud",
      "source": "yudkowsky",
      "target": "if-anyone-builds-it",
      "label": "Coauthor",
      "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
      "limit": "Shared authorship with Nate Soares.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-bio"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-book-yud",
        "source": "yudkowsky",
        "target": "if-anyone-builds-it",
        "label": "Coauthor",
        "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
        "limit": "Shared authorship with Nate Soares.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-bio"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-book-nate",
      "source": "nate-soares",
      "target": "if-anyone-builds-it",
      "label": "Coauthor",
      "summary": "Nate Soares → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
      "limit": "Not sole author or exclusive campaign organizer.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-book-nate",
        "source": "nate-soares",
        "target": "if-anyone-builds-it",
        "label": "Coauthor",
        "summary": "Nate Soares → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
        "limit": "Not sole author or exclusive campaign organizer.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-promotes",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "if-anyone-builds-it",
      "label": "Promotes the book",
      "summary": "ControlAI → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: promotes the book.",
      "limit": "Promotion and adoption, not ownership or subordination.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-controlai"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-promotes",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "if-anyone-builds-it",
        "label": "Promotes the book",
        "summary": "ControlAI → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: promotes the book.",
        "limit": "Promotion and adoption, not ownership or subordination.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-controlai"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-teaching",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "yudkowsky",
      "label": "Cites his briefing method",
      "summary": "ControlAI → Eliezer Yudkowsky: cites his briefing method.",
      "limit": "Intellectual influence; no formal role implied.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-briefing"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-teaching",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "yudkowsky",
        "label": "Cites his briefing method",
        "summary": "ControlAI → Eliezer Yudkowsky: cites his briefing method.",
        "limit": "Intellectual influence; no formal role implied.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-briefing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-sanders-yud",
      "source": "yudkowsky",
      "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "label": "Joined March 2026 briefing",
      "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Bernie Sanders: joined march 2026 briefing.",
      "limit": "March 2026 public account; no September bill drafting or payment inference.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-sanders"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-sanders-yud",
        "source": "yudkowsky",
        "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "label": "Joined March 2026 briefing",
        "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → Bernie Sanders: joined march 2026 briefing.",
        "limit": "March 2026 public account; no September bill drafting or payment inference.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-sanders"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-sanders-nate",
      "source": "nate-soares",
      "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "label": "Joined March 2026 briefing",
      "summary": "Nate Soares → Bernie Sanders: joined march 2026 briefing.",
      "limit": "Same briefing, not independent corroborating event.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-sanders"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-sanders-nate",
        "source": "nate-soares",
        "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "label": "Joined March 2026 briefing",
        "summary": "Nate Soares → Bernie Sanders: joined march 2026 briefing.",
        "limit": "Same briefing, not independent corroborating event.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-sanders"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-treaty-yud",
      "source": "yudkowsky",
      "target": "miri-international-agreement",
      "label": "Collaborated on earlier treaty draft",
      "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: collaborated on earlier treaty draft.",
      "limit": "MIRI states TGT collaborated with Yudkowsky, Soares and others; not sole authorship of later agreement.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-treaty-yud",
        "source": "yudkowsky",
        "target": "miri-international-agreement",
        "label": "Collaborated on earlier treaty draft",
        "summary": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: collaborated on earlier treaty draft.",
        "limit": "MIRI states TGT collaborated with Yudkowsky, Soares and others; not sole authorship of later agreement.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-treaty-tgt",
      "source": "miri-tgt",
      "target": "miri-international-agreement",
      "label": "Developed formal agreement",
      "summary": "MIRI Technical Governance Team → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: developed formal agreement.",
      "limit": "Separate versions and authorship.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-treaty-tgt",
        "source": "miri-tgt",
        "target": "miri-international-agreement",
        "label": "Developed formal agreement",
        "summary": "MIRI Technical Governance Team → MIRI international AI agreement proposal: developed formal agreement.",
        "limit": "Separate versions and authorship.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
      "summary": "Coefficient Giving → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $15,925,143; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
      "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-donors"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil",
        "source": "coefficient",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
        "summary": "Coefficient Giving → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $15,925,143; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
        "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-donors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik",
      "source": "vitalik",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
      "summary": "Vitalik Buterin → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $5,411,216; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
      "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-donors"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik",
        "source": "vitalik",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
        "summary": "Vitalik Buterin → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $5,411,216; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
        "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-donors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
      "summary": "Survival and Flourishing Fund → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $3,372,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
      "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-donors"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
        "summary": "Survival and Flourishing Fund → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $3,372,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
        "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-donors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-tallinn",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
      "summary": "Jaan Tallinn → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $1,631,447; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
      "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-donors"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-tallinn",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
        "summary": "Jaan Tallinn → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $1,631,447; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
        "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-donors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-thiel",
      "source": "thiel-foundation",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Acknowledged past support",
      "summary": "Thiel Foundation → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged past support. MIRI reports $1,627,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
      "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-donors"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-thiel",
        "source": "thiel-foundation",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Acknowledged past support",
        "summary": "Thiel Foundation → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged past support. MIRI reports $1,627,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
        "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-donors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-fli",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
      "summary": "Future of Life Institute → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $412,252; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
      "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-donors"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-donor-fli",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Acknowledged historical support",
        "summary": "Future of Life Institute → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $412,252; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
        "limit": "Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-donors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-y-r-anon-gift",
      "source": "miri-anonymous-2021-donor",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Reported 2021 MKR gift",
      "summary": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: reported 2021 mkr gift. MIRI reports $15,592,829; sale proceeds from the 2021 gift.",
      "limit": "Recipient-reported proceeds; $2.5 million annual spending cap in 2021–2024, remainder available in 2025. No donor identity or MakerDAO corporate-donor conclusion.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-y-s-crypto"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-y-r-anon-gift",
        "source": "miri-anonymous-2021-donor",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Reported 2021 MKR gift",
        "summary": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: reported 2021 mkr gift. MIRI reports $15,592,829; sale proceeds from the 2021 gift.",
        "limit": "Recipient-reported proceeds; $2.5 million annual spending cap in 2021–2024, remainder available in 2025. No donor identity or MakerDAO corporate-donor conclusion.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-y-s-crypto"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-ra-adapts",
      "source": "rational",
      "target": "yudkowsky",
      "label": "Adapts writing; invited contributions",
      "summary": "The channel operator described four adaptations and a production-Discord invitation in October 2023.",
      "limit": "Historical participant account. Does not establish majority authorship, ownership or a paid commission.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-ra-comments"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-ra-adapts",
        "source": "rational",
        "target": "yudkowsky",
        "label": "Adapts writing; invited contributions",
        "summary": "The channel operator described four adaptations and a production-Discord invitation in October 2023.",
        "limit": "Historical participant account. Does not establish majority authorship, ownership or a paid commission.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-ra-comments"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-miri-recommends-ra",
      "source": "miri",
      "target": "rational",
      "label": "Recommends for work and donations",
      "summary": "MIRI’s public action page recommends Rational Animations among several organizations.",
      "limit": "Recommendation is not a MIRI grant or mutual agreement on every position.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-miri-action"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-miri-recommends-ra",
        "source": "miri",
        "target": "rational",
        "label": "Recommends for work and donations",
        "summary": "MIRI’s public action page recommends Rational Animations among several organizations.",
        "limit": "Recommendation is not a MIRI grant or mutual agreement on every position.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-miri-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-ca-ra",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "rational",
      "label": "Names as sponsored partner",
      "summary": "ControlAI names Rational Animations as a paid video partner in its September 8 account.",
      "limit": "Sponsor self-report; contract, payment amount and complete-video authorship not established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-outreach"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-ca-ra",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "rational",
        "label": "Names as sponsored partner",
        "summary": "ControlAI names Rational Animations as a paid video partner in its September 8 account.",
        "limit": "Sponsor self-report; contract, payment amount and complete-video authorship not established.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-outreach"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-eaif-ra",
      "source": "ea-infrastructure-fund",
      "target": "rational",
      "label": "$30,000 reported 2021 award",
      "summary": "The fund report describes an early $30,000 award to Rational Animations and an audience-building rationale.",
      "limit": "Award report, not bank evidence; report-level acceptance qualification applies. June publication describes the Q1 round and April payout.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-ra-grant"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-eaif-ra",
        "source": "ea-infrastructure-fund",
        "target": "rational",
        "label": "$30,000 reported 2021 award",
        "summary": "The fund report describes an early $30,000 award to Rational Animations and an audience-building rationale.",
        "limit": "Award report, not bank evidence; report-level acceptance qualification applies. June publication describes the Q1 round and April payout.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-ra-grant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-ca-sabine",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "sabine-hossenfelder",
      "label": "Identifies itself behind disputed offer",
      "summary": "ControlAI identifies itself as the organization that approached Hossenfelder; the parties dispute the requested editorial control.",
      "limit": "No completed sponsorship, payment to Hossenfelder or verbatim final instruction established. Accounts are attributed, not reconciled by unseen correspondence.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Video 5 September; response 8 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-outreach",
        "w35-s-sabine"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-ca-sabine",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "sabine-hossenfelder",
        "label": "Identifies itself behind disputed offer",
        "summary": "ControlAI identifies itself as the organization that approached Hossenfelder; the parties dispute the requested editorial control.",
        "limit": "No completed sponsorship, payment to Hossenfelder or verbatim final instruction established. Accounts are attributed, not reconciled by unseen correspondence.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Video 5 September; response 8 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-outreach",
          "w35-s-sabine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-ca-program",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "controlai-creator-outreach",
      "label": "Runs creator partnerships",
      "summary": "ControlAI describes a creator programme supporting its campaign for an international ASI ban.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-outreach"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-ca-program",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "controlai-creator-outreach",
        "label": "Runs creator partnerships",
        "summary": "ControlAI describes a creator programme supporting its campaign for an international ASI ban.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-outreach"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-winga-outreach",
      "source": "winga",
      "target": "controlai-creator-outreach",
      "label": "Outreach lead; coauthors public account",
      "summary": "Max Winga coauthored the September 8 explanation and is the programme’s listed contact.",
      "limit": "Coauthorship and public role do not establish that he personally wrote every negotiation email.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-outreach"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-winga-outreach",
        "source": "winga",
        "target": "controlai-creator-outreach",
        "label": "Outreach lead; coauthors public account",
        "summary": "Max Winga coauthored the September 8 explanation and is the programme’s listed contact.",
        "limit": "Coauthorship and public role do not establish that he personally wrote every negotiation email.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-outreach"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-miotti-outreach",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "controlai-creator-outreach",
      "label": "Coauthors public account",
      "summary": "Andrea Miotti coauthored the response identifying ControlAI and explaining its creator partnerships.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-outreach"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-miotti-outreach",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "controlai-creator-outreach",
        "label": "Coauthors public account",
        "summary": "Andrea Miotti coauthored the response identifying ControlAI and explaining its creator partnerships.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-outreach"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-founder",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Identifies as founder and writer",
      "summary": "Identifies as founder and writer. Self-identification; legal ownership not established.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-profile"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-founder",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Identifies as founder and writer",
        "summary": "Identifies as founder and writer. Self-identification; legal ownership not established.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-profile"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika",
      "source": "w35-pika",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
      "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 28 February 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-pika"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika",
        "source": "w35-pika",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
        "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 28 February 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-pika"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo",
      "source": "w35-toyo",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
      "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 July 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-toyo"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo",
        "source": "w35-toyo",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
        "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 July 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-toyo"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-tars",
      "source": "w35-tars",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
      "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 22 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-tars"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-tars",
        "source": "w35-tars",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
        "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 22 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-tars"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-uncensored",
      "source": "w35-uncensored",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
      "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-uncensored",
        "source": "w35-uncensored",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
        "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-domus",
      "source": "w35-domus",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
      "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-domus",
        "source": "w35-domus",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
        "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 August 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-wsj",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "jacob-coxon",
      "label": "Circulates WSJ warning",
      "summary": "Circulates WSJ warning. Explicitly attributed to WSJ; content opening only.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-coxon-wsj"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-wsj",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "jacob-coxon",
        "label": "Circulates WSJ warning",
        "summary": "Circulates WSJ warning. Explicitly attributed to WSJ; content opening only.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-coxon-wsj"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-nbc",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "jacob-coxon",
      "label": "Circulates NBC interview",
      "summary": "Circulates NBC interview. Attributed to NBC; not proof of adopting every conclusion.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-coxon-nbc"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-nbc",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "jacob-coxon",
        "label": "Circulates NBC interview",
        "summary": "Circulates NBC interview. Attributed to NBC; not proof of adopting every conclusion.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-coxon-nbc"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-anthropic",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Circulates assessment",
      "summary": "Circulates assessment. Does not establish employment or sponsorship.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-anthropic"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-anthropic",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "anthropic",
        "label": "Circulates assessment",
        "summary": "Circulates assessment. Does not establish employment or sponsorship.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-anthropic"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sacks",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "david-sacks",
      "label": "Recommends reading post",
      "summary": "Recommends reading post. Calls post a must read; rejects inference of exclusive ideological alignment.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-sacks"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sacks",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "david-sacks",
        "label": "Recommends reading post",
        "summary": "Recommends reading post. Calls post a must read; rejects inference of exclusive ideological alignment.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-sacks"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-meta",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "meta",
      "label": "Covers models and quotes policy",
      "summary": "Covers models and quotes policy. Technical enthusiasm plus attributed quotation.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-meta",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "meta",
        "label": "Covers models and quotes policy",
        "summary": "Covers models and quotes policy. Technical enthusiasm plus attributed quotation.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sanders",
      "source": "rohan-paul",
      "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "label": "Quotes pause demand",
      "summary": "Quotes pause demand. Not endorsement, campaign employment or coordination.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sanders",
        "source": "rohan-paul",
        "target": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "label": "Quotes pause demand",
        "summary": "Quotes pause demand. Not endorsement, campaign employment or coordination.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-aug11"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-limestone",
      "source": "w35-limestone",
      "target": "rohans-bytes",
      "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
      "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 24 July publication,23 July edition heading; amounts/contracts/payment unseen.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w35-s-r-src-july24"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-limestone",
        "source": "w35-limestone",
        "target": "rohans-bytes",
        "label": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
        "summary": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 24 July publication,23 July edition heading; amounts/contracts/payment unseen.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "2026 publication; checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w35-s-r-src-july24"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-vehicle",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-slimrock",
      "label": "Identifies as his holding company",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s donor-ledger footnote identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-vehicle",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-slimrock",
        "label": "Identifies as his holding company",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s donor-ledger footnote identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-control-2023",
      "source": "w36-slimrock",
      "target": "sfr",
      "label": "£500,000 donation, November 2023",
      "summary": "Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 14 November 2023; USD ledger equivalent $615,850.",
      "limit": "Donor report; no allocation to a particular creator or campaign.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2023-11-14",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-control-2023",
        "source": "w36-slimrock",
        "target": "sfr",
        "label": "£500,000 donation, November 2023",
        "summary": "Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 14 November 2023; USD ledger equivalent $615,850.",
        "limit": "Donor report; no allocation to a particular creator or campaign.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2023-11-14",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-control-2024",
      "source": "w36-slimrock",
      "target": "sfr",
      "label": "£2m donation, April 2024",
      "summary": "Tallinn reports £2m disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 10 April 2024; USD ledger equivalent $2,546,200.",
      "limit": "Do not infer a donor-dependence percentage from the filed balance sheets.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2024-04-10",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-control-2024",
        "source": "w36-slimrock",
        "target": "sfr",
        "label": "£2m donation, April 2024",
        "summary": "Tallinn reports £2m disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 10 April 2024; USD ledger equivalent $2,546,200.",
        "limit": "Do not infer a donor-dependence percentage from the filed balance sheets.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2024-04-10",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-legal",
      "source": "sfr",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "UK legal identity",
      "summary": "Company 15088415, formerly Secure Future Research Ltd, became CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-10",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-registry"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-legal",
        "source": "sfr",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "UK legal identity",
        "summary": "Company 15088415, formerly Secure Future Research Ltd, became CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-10",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-registry"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-fli-board",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Co-founder and board member",
      "summary": "FLI identifies Tallinn as a co-founder and board member and distinguishes that role in its donor-influence disclosure.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-fli",
        "w36-s-flifin"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-fli-board",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Co-founder and board member",
        "summary": "FLI identifies Tallinn as a co-founder and board member and distinguishes that role in its donor-influence disclosure.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-fli",
          "w36-s-flifin"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-allocation",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "sff",
      "label": "Weights and final funding adjustments",
      "summary": "SFF’s 2025 process gives Tallinn a role in deference weights and final allocation adjustments.",
      "limit": "Recommendations can be conditional or pending; not all are disbursed.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-sff"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-allocation",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "sff",
        "label": "Weights and final funding adjustments",
        "summary": "SFF’s 2025 process gives Tallinn a role in deference weights and final allocation adjustments.",
        "limit": "Recommendations can be conditional or pending; not all are disbursed.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-sff"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-sfc-client",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-sfc",
      "label": "Primary client",
      "summary": "SFC’s September 2026 update identifies Tallinn as its primary client.",
      "limit": "SFC describes its own separate ownership and facilitation discretion.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-sfc"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-sfc-client",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-sfc",
        "label": "Primary client",
        "summary": "SFC’s September 2026 update identifies Tallinn as its primary client.",
        "limit": "SFC describes its own separate ownership and facilitation discretion.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-sfc"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-sfc-sff",
      "source": "w36-sfc",
      "target": "sff",
      "label": "Facilitates grantmaking",
      "summary": "SFC describes its work facilitating grants associated with SFF.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-sfc"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-sfc-sff",
        "source": "w36-sfc",
        "target": "sff",
        "label": "Facilitates grantmaking",
        "summary": "SFC describes its work facilitating grants associated with SFF.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-sfc"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-investment",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Led 2021 financing round",
      "summary": "Anthropic says Tallinn led its $124m financing round announced 28 May 2021.",
      "limit": "The $124m is the entire round, not Tallinn’s individual investment.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2021-05-28",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-anthropic"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-investment",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "anthropic",
        "label": "Led 2021 financing round",
        "summary": "Anthropic says Tallinn led its $124m financing round announced 28 May 2021.",
        "limit": "The $124m is the entire round, not Tallinn’s individual investment.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2021-05-28",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-anthropic"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-conjecture",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "conjecture",
      "label": "Metaplanet portfolio connection",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s investment vehicle Metaplanet lists Conjecture in its portfolio with a 2022 entry.",
      "limit": "A commercial investment is distinct from later donations to ControlAI.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-metaplanet"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-conjecture",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "conjecture",
        "label": "Metaplanet portfolio connection",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s investment vehicle Metaplanet lists Conjecture in its portfolio with a 2022 entry.",
        "limit": "A commercial investment is distinct from later donations to ControlAI.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-metaplanet"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-aitof",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "label": "$786,994 designated contribution, 2024",
      "summary": "Tallinn records $786,994 via SFF to Vanguard Charitable for account A2003126, AISTOF, on 27 November 2024.",
      "limit": "Pooled fund; no allocation of this contribution to a specific downstream project.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2024-11-27",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-aitof",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "label": "$786,994 designated contribution, 2024",
        "summary": "Tallinn records $786,994 via SFF to Vanguard Charitable for account A2003126, AISTOF, on 27 November 2024.",
        "limit": "Pooled fund; no allocation of this contribution to a specific downstream project.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2024-11-27",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-vanguard",
      "source": "w36-vanguard",
      "target": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "label": "Named payee for designated account",
      "summary": "The donor ledger names Vanguard Charitable as payee for the AISTOF-designated account.",
      "limit": "Same upstream transfer, not another donation.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-vanguard",
        "source": "w36-vanguard",
        "target": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "label": "Named payee for designated account",
        "summary": "The donor ledger names Vanguard Charitable as payee for the AISTOF-designated account.",
        "limit": "Same upstream transfer, not another donation.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-manager",
      "source": "w36-jueyan",
      "target": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "label": "Runs pooled fund",
      "summary": "Zhang’s public biography identifies him as running AISTOF, a pooled multi-donor fund.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-jueyan"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-manager",
        "source": "w36-jueyan",
        "target": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "label": "Runs pooled fund",
        "summary": "Zhang’s public biography identifies him as running AISTOF, a pooled multi-donor fund.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-jueyan"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-frame",
      "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Named lead funder",
      "summary": "Frame’s public FAQ names AISTOF among its lead funders.",
      "limit": "Frame says funders do not select fellows or direct editorial content; grant contract not obtained.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-frame"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-frame",
        "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Named lead funder",
        "summary": "Frame’s public FAQ names AISTOF among its lead funders.",
        "limit": "Frame says funders do not select fellows or direct editorial content; grant contract not obtained.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-frame"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-film",
      "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "target": "w36-documentary",
      "label": "$41,162 documentary grant",
      "summary": "The fund’s public account records $41,162 to the SB-1047 documentary; the project dates its AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025.",
      "limit": "Media financing is established; editorial approval rights and tracing to Tallinn’s contribution are not.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2025-01-21",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-manifund",
        "w36-s-film"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-film",
        "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "target": "w36-documentary",
        "label": "$41,162 documentary grant",
        "summary": "The fund’s public account records $41,162 to the SB-1047 documentary; the project dates its AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025.",
        "limit": "Media financing is established; editorial approval rights and tracing to Tallinn’s contribution are not.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2025-01-21",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-manifund",
          "w36-s-film"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-director",
      "source": "w36-trazzi",
      "target": "w36-documentary",
      "label": "Documentary creator",
      "summary": "The public project proposal identifies Trazzi as the creator associated with the SB-1047 documentary.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-film"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-director",
        "source": "w36-trazzi",
        "target": "w36-documentary",
        "label": "Documentary creator",
        "summary": "The public project proposal identifies Trazzi as the creator associated with the SB-1047 documentary.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-film"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-aipi",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-aipi",
      "label": "$442,000 across three 2024 entries",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger reports $10,000, $300,000 and $132,000 associated with AIPI in July and December 2024.",
      "limit": "Recommendations and disbursements must be reconciled, not added together.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-aipi",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-aipi",
        "label": "$442,000 across three 2024 entries",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger reports $10,000, $300,000 and $132,000 associated with AIPI in July and December 2024.",
        "limit": "Recommendations and disbursements must be reconciled, not added together.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-fiscal",
      "source": "w36-hack",
      "target": "w36-aipi",
      "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payment route",
      "summary": "The Hack Foundation appears as fiscal sponsor and in AIPI’s donation route.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-hack",
        "w36-s-aipi",
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-fiscal",
        "source": "w36-hack",
        "target": "w36-aipi",
        "label": "Fiscal sponsorship and payment route",
        "summary": "The Hack Foundation appears as fiscal sponsor and in AIPI’s donation route.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-hack",
          "w36-s-aipi",
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-caisaction",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "caisaction",
      "label": "$3.221m across five 2023–2024 entries",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger contains five payments associated with the Center for AI Safety Action Fund totaling $3,221,000 during 2023–2024.",
      "limit": "Historical selected disbursements, not a current campaign budget.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-caisaction",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "caisaction",
        "label": "$3.221m across five 2023–2024 entries",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger contains five payments associated with the Center for AI Safety Action Fund totaling $3,221,000 during 2023–2024.",
        "limit": "Historical selected disbursements, not a current campaign budget.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-pauseglobal",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-pause-global",
      "label": "$30,000 across two 2024 entries",
      "summary": "Tallinn reports $20,000 in March and $10,000 in November 2024 for Stichting PauseAI.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-pauseglobal",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-pause-global",
        "label": "$30,000 across two 2024 entries",
        "summary": "Tallinn reports $20,000 in March and $10,000 in November 2024 for Stichting PauseAI.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-pauseus",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "pauseai-us",
      "label": "$60,000 across three 2024 entries",
      "summary": "Tallinn reports three July–August 2024 payments through Manifold for Charity for PauseAI USA totaling $60,000.",
      "limit": "Distinct from the global Dutch foundation.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-pauseus",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "pauseai-us",
        "label": "$60,000 across three 2024 entries",
        "summary": "Tallinn reports three July–August 2024 payments through Manifold for Charity for PauseAI USA totaling $60,000.",
        "limit": "Distinct from the global Dutch foundation.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-pa-control",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "controlai",
      "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
      "summary": "PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
      "limit": "PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-pause"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-pa-control",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "controlai",
        "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
        "summary": "PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
        "limit": "PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-pause"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-pa-fli",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "fli",
      "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
      "summary": "PauseAI’s theory of change names Future of Life Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
      "limit": "PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-pause"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-pa-fli",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "fli",
        "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
        "summary": "PauseAI’s theory of change names Future of Life Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
        "limit": "PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-pause"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-pa-miri",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "miri",
      "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
      "summary": "PauseAI’s theory of change names Machine Intelligence Research Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
      "limit": "PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-pause"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-pa-miri",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "miri",
        "label": "Declared policy counterpart",
        "summary": "PauseAI’s theory of change names Machine Intelligence Research Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.",
        "limit": "PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-pause"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-micro",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "w36-microgrants",
      "label": "Approves small grants and deliverables",
      "summary": "Published rules assign approval to CEO and Organizing Director, with grant letters specifying purpose, deliverables and schedule.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-micro"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-micro",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "w36-microgrants",
        "label": "Approves small grants and deliverables",
        "summary": "Published rules assign approval to CEO and Organizing Director, with grant letters specifying purpose, deliverables and schedule.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-micro"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-roadmap",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "w36-roadmap",
      "label": "Proposes expanded communications capacity",
      "summary": "PauseAI publishes funding scenarios for PR, narrative production and additional advocacy organizations.",
      "limit": "Conditional plans, not established expenditure or existing new organizations.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-roadmap"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-roadmap",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "w36-roadmap",
        "label": "Proposes expanded communications capacity",
        "summary": "PauseAI publishes funding scenarios for PR, narrative production and additional advocacy organizations.",
        "limit": "Conditional plans, not established expenditure or existing new organizations.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-roadmap"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-cltr",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-cltr",
      "label": "$4.466m across seven 2021–2024 entries",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger reports seven CLTR-related payments totaling $4,466,000 during 2021–2024.",
      "limit": "Historical donor report; overlaps with recipient and SFF reports.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-cltr",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-cltr",
        "label": "$4.466m across seven 2021–2024 entries",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger reports seven CLTR-related payments totaling $4,466,000 during 2021–2024.",
        "limit": "Historical donor report; overlaps with recipient and SFF reports.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-cltr-sff",
      "source": "sff",
      "target": "w36-cltr",
      "label": "All £470,224 received in 2023",
      "summary": "CLTR’s 2023 annual report attributes all £470,224 received that year to SFF.",
      "limit": "Recipient-side year-specific disclosure; do not add to overlapping Tallinn ledger payments.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-cltr"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-cltr-sff",
        "source": "sff",
        "target": "w36-cltr",
        "label": "All £470,224 received in 2023",
        "summary": "CLTR’s 2023 annual report attributes all £470,224 received that year to SFF.",
        "limit": "Recipient-side year-specific disclosure; do not add to overlapping Tallinn ledger payments.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-cltr"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-draft",
      "source": "w36-cltr",
      "target": "w36-guide",
      "label": "Claims section authorship",
      "summary": "CLTR reports authoring the model-reporting and information-sharing section. The government acknowledges it among contributors.",
      "limit": "Participation corroborated; exact section authorship remains CLTR’s account.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-cltr",
        "w36-s-guide"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-draft",
        "source": "w36-cltr",
        "target": "w36-guide",
        "label": "Claims section authorship",
        "summary": "CLTR reports authoring the model-reporting and information-sharing section. The government acknowledges it among contributors.",
        "limit": "Participation corroborated; exact section authorship remains CLTR’s account.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-cltr",
          "w36-s-guide"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-publish",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w36-guide",
      "label": "Published nonmandatory guide",
      "summary": "DSIT published the frontier-AI safety guide on 27 October 2023 as a nonmandatory menu of emerging practices.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2023-10-27",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-guide"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-publish",
        "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
        "target": "w36-guide",
        "label": "Published nonmandatory guide",
        "summary": "DSIT published the frontier-AI safety guide on 27 October 2023 as a nonmandatory menu of emerging practices.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2023-10-27",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-guide"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-sgowner",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-slimrock-sg",
      "label": "Reported company owner",
      "summary": "Habryka identifies Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. as Tallinn-owned in his March 2023 financing account.",
      "limit": "Borrower-side public statement; ownership instruments not inspected.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-loan"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-sgowner",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-slimrock-sg",
        "label": "Reported company owner",
        "summary": "Habryka identifies Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. as Tallinn-owned in his March 2023 financing account.",
        "limit": "Borrower-side public statement; ownership instruments not inspected.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-loan"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-loan",
      "source": "w36-slimrock-sg",
      "target": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "label": "$20m reported property loan",
      "summary": "Habryka describes $16.5m for property purchase and $3.5m for renovations, lent by Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
      "limit": "Loan, not grant. Executed terms, collateral and current balance remain unexamined.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-loan"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-loan",
        "source": "w36-slimrock-sg",
        "target": "lightcone-infrastructure",
        "label": "$20m reported property loan",
        "summary": "Habryka describes $16.5m for property purchase and $3.5m for renovations, lent by Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
        "limit": "Loan, not grant. Executed terms, collateral and current balance remain unexamined.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-loan"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-advance",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "label": "Settlement advance offsets later grants",
      "summary": "Lightcone’s 2025 fundraiser describes a $1.7m FTX-settlement arrangement involving Tallinn and SFC, with half of later grant recommendations withheld until $1.29m is offset.",
      "limit": "Separate from the property mortgage; not an unrestricted new annual grant.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-advance"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-advance",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "lightcone-infrastructure",
        "label": "Settlement advance offsets later grants",
        "summary": "Lightcone’s 2025 fundraiser describes a $1.7m FTX-settlement arrangement involving Tallinn and SFC, with half of later grant recommendations withheld until $1.29m is offset.",
        "limit": "Separate from the property mortgage; not an unrestricted new annual grant.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-advance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-tarbell",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-tarbell",
      "label": "$520,000 programme support in 2024",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger reports two 2024 payments through Players Philanthropy Fund for Tarbell Fellowship totaling $520,000.",
      "limit": "Programme support does not establish instructions to a particular journalist.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-tarbell",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-tarbell",
        "label": "$520,000 programme support in 2024",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger reports two 2024 payments through Players Philanthropy Fund for Tarbell Fellowship totaling $520,000.",
        "limit": "Programme support does not establish instructions to a particular journalist.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-e-appg",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w36-appg",
      "label": "$251,000 designated support, 2020–2022",
      "summary": "Four donor-ledger payments via Founders Pledge UK designate APPG for Future Generations and total $251,000 during 2020–2022.",
      "limit": "Not government funding or an MP’s personal income.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-e-appg",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "w36-appg",
        "label": "$251,000 designated support, 2020–2022",
        "summary": "Four donor-ledger payments via Founders Pledge UK designate APPG for Future Generations and total $251,000 during 2020–2022.",
        "limit": "Not government funding or an MP’s personal income.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments",
      "source": "w37-civic-bluevote-org",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "label": "Reported USD1,500 in platform purchases",
      "summary": "BLUEVOTE.ORG reports USD 500 on 2025-09-02 and USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 for Advocacy platform, transactions SB21B.4423/.4424.",
      "limit": "Selected filing, not complete revenue, equity or AI-campaign funding.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "committee-reported payments",
      "eventDate": "2025",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-bluevote"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments",
        "source": "w37-civic-bluevote-org",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "label": "Reported USD1,500 in platform purchases",
        "summary": "BLUEVOTE.ORG reports USD 500 on 2025-09-02 and USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 for Advocacy platform, transactions SB21B.4423/.4424.",
        "limit": "Selected filing, not complete revenue, equity or AI-campaign funding.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "committee-reported payments",
        "eventDate": "2025",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-bluevote"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated",
      "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "target": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
      "label": "Controls Joint Action admission and credits",
      "summary": "Civic Shout retains discretion over hosts, participation, referral attribution, validity and credit issuance.",
      "limit": "Published powers, not an audit of individual decisions.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published terms",
      "eventDate": "2026-01-31",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-partners",
        "w37-civic-s-host"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated",
        "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "target": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
        "label": "Controls Joint Action admission and credits",
        "summary": "Civic Shout retains discretion over hosts, participation, referral attribution, validity and credit issuance.",
        "limit": "Published powers, not an audit of individual decisions.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published terms",
        "eventDate": "2026-01-31",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-partners",
          "w37-civic-s-host"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer",
      "source": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Offers noncash referral credits",
      "summary": "The AI petition offers USD 2.25 in advertising credits, equal to three eligible national CPC clicks, per qualifying referred signature.",
      "limit": "No cash value; actual issuance, redemption, spend and delivery unverified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published offer",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-petition",
        "w37-civic-s-partners"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer",
        "source": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "label": "Offers noncash referral credits",
        "summary": "The AI petition offers USD 2.25 in advertising credits, equal to three eligible national CPC clicks, per qualifying referred signature.",
        "limit": "No cash value; actual issuance, redemption, spend and delivery unverified.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published offer",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-petition",
          "w37-civic-s-partners"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-affiliate-operated",
      "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "target": "w37-civic-affiliate-program",
      "label": "Runs revenue-share referral program",
      "summary": "Separate affiliate terms allow variable revenue-share compensation through Stripe or optional platform credits.",
      "limit": "Not the Joint Action program; no particular affiliate payout verified.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published terms",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-affiliates"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-affiliate-operated",
        "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "target": "w37-civic-affiliate-program",
        "label": "Runs revenue-share referral program",
        "summary": "Separate affiliate terms allow variable revenue-share compensation through Stripe or optional platform credits.",
        "limit": "Not the Joint Action program; no particular affiliate payout verified.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published terms",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-affiliates"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-ceo",
      "source": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "label": "CEO",
      "summary": "Nelson signed a 2022 FEC comment as Civic Shout CEO; current company posts continue to identify his leadership.",
      "limit": "No ownership share established.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2022",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-nelson",
        "w37-civic-s-civic_company"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-ceo",
        "source": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "label": "CEO",
        "summary": "Nelson signed a 2022 FEC comment as Civic Shout CEO; current company posts continue to identify his leadership.",
        "limit": "No ownership share established.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2022",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-nelson",
          "w37-civic-s-civic_company"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-cofounder",
      "source": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "label": "Historical cofounder and product designer",
      "summary": "Golden’s professional résumé identifies this role in 2016–2018.",
      "limit": "Self-reported historical role, not current equity.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2016",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-golden"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-cofounder",
        "source": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "label": "Historical cofounder and product designer",
        "summary": "Golden’s professional résumé identifies this role in 2016–2018.",
        "limit": "Self-reported historical role, not current equity.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2016",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-golden"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-lead",
      "source": "w37-civic-marie-bergen",
      "target": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
      "label": "Head of Joint Actions",
      "summary": "The official hosting page names Bergen as Head of Joint Actions and directs potential hosts to her.",
      "limit": "Company terms retain formal program discretion.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-host"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-lead",
        "source": "w37-civic-marie-bergen",
        "target": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
        "label": "Head of Joint Actions",
        "summary": "The official hosting page names Bergen as Head of Joint Actions and directs potential hosts to her.",
        "limit": "Company terms retain formal program discretion.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-host"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated",
      "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
      "label": "Operates charitable project",
      "summary": "The Foundation’s current legal notice identifies Civic Shout LLC as its operator under fiscal sponsorship.",
      "limit": "The notice describes a sponsored project; it does not establish a separate incorporated foundation or sponsor ownership.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-foundation"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated",
        "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
        "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
        "label": "Operates charitable project",
        "summary": "The Foundation’s current legal notice identifies Civic Shout LLC as its operator under fiscal sponsorship.",
        "limit": "The notice describes a sponsored project; it does not establish a separate incorporated foundation or sponsor ownership.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-foundation"
        ],
        "_raw": {
          "id": "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated",
          "source": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
          "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
          "label": "Operates charitable project",
          "summary": "The Foundation’s current legal notice identifies Civic Shout LLC as its operator under fiscal sponsorship.",
          "limit": "Not a separately incorporated foundation or sponsor ownership claim.",
          "family": "implementation",
          "directed": true,
          "status": "reported",
          "stage": "recorded",
          "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
          "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
          "sources": [
            "w37-civic-s-foundation"
          ]
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-foundation-sponsored",
      "source": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
      "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
      "label": "Fiscal sponsor disclosed",
      "summary": "The Foundation identifies Players Philanthropy Fund Inc, EIN 27-6601178, as fiscal sponsor.",
      "limit": "No sponsorship contract inspected; current and older legal-form descriptions differ. Sponsorship is not ownership.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-foundation"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-foundation-sponsored",
        "source": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
        "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
        "label": "Fiscal sponsor disclosed",
        "summary": "The Foundation identifies Players Philanthropy Fund Inc, EIN 27-6601178, as fiscal sponsor.",
        "limit": "No sponsorship contract inspected; current and older legal-form descriptions differ. Sponsorship is not ownership.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-foundation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-nelson-foundation",
      "source": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
      "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
      "label": "Named Foundation team participant",
      "summary": "The Foundation team page names Nelson and describes his nonprofit-email and Civic Shout work.",
      "limit": "No formal corporate board or donor-selection powers established.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-foundation_about"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-nelson-foundation",
        "source": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
        "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
        "label": "Named Foundation team participant",
        "summary": "The Foundation team page names Nelson and describes his nonprofit-email and Civic Shout work.",
        "limit": "No formal corporate board or donor-selection powers established.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-foundation_about"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-golden-foundation",
      "source": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
      "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
      "label": "Named Foundation strategy participant",
      "summary": "The Foundation describes Golden’s conversion optimization and strategy work.",
      "limit": "Public role description, not an inspected governance mandate.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-foundation_about"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-golden-foundation",
        "source": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
        "target": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
        "label": "Named Foundation strategy participant",
        "summary": "The Foundation describes Golden’s conversion optimization and strategy work.",
        "limit": "Public role description, not an inspected governance mandate.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-foundation_about"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-action-collective-participant",
      "source": "w37-civic-action-collective",
      "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
      "label": "Listed AI-petition participant",
      "summary": "The live preview names Action Collective alongside College Democrats of America and Left Click.",
      "limit": "Host-reported participation, not independently verified referrals. Distinct from Collective Shout.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-petition",
        "w37-civic-s-action"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-action-collective-participant",
        "source": "w37-civic-action-collective",
        "target": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
        "label": "Listed AI-petition participant",
        "summary": "The live preview names Action Collective alongside College Democrats of America and Left Click.",
        "limit": "Host-reported participation, not independently verified referrals. Distinct from Collective Shout.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-petition",
          "w37-civic-s-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-tallinn-frame",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Frame reports USD20,000 via unnamed DAF",
      "summary": "An organization-edited Grants Received block updated 13 July 2026 lists Jaan Tallin (DAF), USD 20,000. Context supports the intended Tallinn identity.",
      "limit": "Recipient report; DAF identity, payment date and agreement unknown. No pooled tracing, creator allocation or selection veto established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recipient-reported grant",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-frame"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-tallinn-frame",
        "source": "tallinn",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Frame reports USD20,000 via unnamed DAF",
        "summary": "An organization-edited Grants Received block updated 13 July 2026 lists Jaan Tallin (DAF), USD 20,000. Context supports the intended Tallinn identity.",
        "limit": "Recipient report; DAF identity, payment date and agreement unknown. No pooled tracing, creator allocation or selection veto established.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recipient-reported grant",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-frame"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-aistof-frame",
      "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
      "target": "frame",
      "label": "Frame reports USD280,000 for first cohort",
      "summary": "Frame reports USD 280,000 from AISTOF; Akshyae Singh says it funded Cohort 1.0.",
      "limit": "Recipient report; payment date and terms unknown. A separate hidden-amount AISTOF record prevents treating this as complete support. No contributor-to-creator allocation established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recipient-reported grant",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-civic-s-frame"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-aistof-frame",
        "source": "w1-creator-aitof",
        "target": "frame",
        "label": "Frame reports USD280,000 for first cohort",
        "summary": "Frame reports USD 280,000 from AISTOF; Akshyae Singh says it funded Cohort 1.0.",
        "limit": "Recipient report; payment date and terms unknown. A separate hidden-amount AISTOF record prevents treating this as complete support. No contributor-to-creator allocation established.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recipient-reported grant",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-civic-s-frame"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-role",
      "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "target": "a16z",
      "label": "cofounder and general partner",
      "summary": "Meta's roster records Andreessen as a16z general partner since July 2009.",
      "limit": "Role does not attribute all firm payments or individual portfolio decisions to him.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-role"
      ],
      "period": "July 2009–current roster",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-role",
        "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
        "target": "a16z",
        "label": "cofounder and general partner",
        "summary": "Meta's roster records Andreessen as a16z general partner since July 2009.",
        "limit": "Role does not attribute all firm payments or individual portfolio decisions to him.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-role"
        ],
        "period": "July 2009–current roster"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-meta",
      "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "target": "meta",
      "label": "director; Risk & Strategy Committee member",
      "summary": "Current roster places Andreessen on Meta's board and Risk & Strategy Committee. Charter provides strategic review, recommendations and adviser-retention functions.",
      "limit": "Collective oversight, not unilateral AI control; members removable by board; most committee functions may be performed by board.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-role",
        "w37-marc-s-charter"
      ],
      "period": "Director since June 2008; charter effective 2025-06-01; current membership checked 2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-meta",
        "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
        "target": "meta",
        "label": "director; Risk & Strategy Committee member",
        "summary": "Current roster places Andreessen on Meta's board and Risk & Strategy Committee. Charter provides strategic review, recommendations and adviser-retention functions.",
        "limit": "Collective oversight, not unilateral AI control; members removable by board; most committee functions may be performed by board.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-role",
          "w37-marc-s-charter"
        ],
        "period": "Director since June 2008; charter effective 2025-06-01; current membership checked 2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-rfa",
      "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "target": "w37-marc-right-for-america",
      "label": "personal political contribution",
      "summary": "Schedule A p6 records Marc Andreessen $2.5m; SA11A.12495; employer A16Z.",
      "limit": "A16Z employer field is not donor identity. One checked receipt, not complete cycle/lifetime total.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported_received",
      "eventDate": "2024-07-24",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-rfa"
      ],
      "financial": {
        "value": 2500000,
        "currency": "USD",
        "kind": "individual contribution receipt",
        "period": "2024-07-24",
        "restriction": null
      },
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-rfa",
        "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
        "target": "w37-marc-right-for-america",
        "label": "personal political contribution",
        "summary": "Schedule A p6 records Marc Andreessen $2.5m; SA11A.12495; employer A16Z.",
        "limit": "A16Z employer field is not donor identity. One checked receipt, not complete cycle/lifetime total.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "reported_received",
        "eventDate": "2024-07-24",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-rfa"
        ],
        "financial": {
          "value": 2500000,
          "currency": "USD",
          "kind": "individual contribution receipt",
          "period": "2024-07-24",
          "restriction": null
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-fairshake47",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
      "label": "firm contributions reported",
      "summary": "May 2024 update says firm contributions to Fairshake and associated PACs totaled $47m.",
      "limit": "Aggregate scope; not all necessarily paid to Fairshake proper. August correction says founder ownership memo items are non-additive and not personal gifts. Firm explicitly disclaims spending control. Not a current full FEC audit.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "donor_reported",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-fairshake"
      ],
      "financial": {
        "value": 47000000,
        "currency": "USD",
        "kind": "donor-disclosed aggregate",
        "period": "Through May 2024; identity correction August 2024",
        "restriction": "Donor says it will not control Fairshake spending."
      },
      "period": "Through May 2024; identity correction August 2024",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-fairshake47",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
        "label": "firm contributions reported",
        "summary": "May 2024 update says firm contributions to Fairshake and associated PACs totaled $47m.",
        "limit": "Aggregate scope; not all necessarily paid to Fairshake proper. August correction says founder ownership memo items are non-additive and not personal gifts. Firm explicitly disclaims spending control. Not a current full FEC audit.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "donor_reported",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-fairshake"
        ],
        "financial": {
          "value": 47000000,
          "currency": "USD",
          "kind": "donor-disclosed aggregate",
          "period": "Through May 2024; identity correction August 2024",
          "restriction": "Donor says it will not control Fairshake spending."
        },
        "period": "Through May 2024; identity correction August 2024"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-fairshake26",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
      "label": "additional firm election-cycle support announced",
      "summary": "Dixon announces more than $23m additional funds for Fairshake and affiliated PACs for 2026 cycle.",
      "limit": "Not independently reconciled to committee receipts or later contributions. Do not label a September 2026 cumulative total.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-11-04",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-fairshake26"
      ],
      "financial": {
        "value": 23000000,
        "comparison": "greater_than",
        "currency": "USD",
        "kind": "additional donor-announced support",
        "period": "2026 election cycle",
        "restriction": null
      },
      "period": "2026 election cycle",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-fairshake26",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
        "label": "additional firm election-cycle support announced",
        "summary": "Dixon announces more than $23m additional funds for Fairshake and affiliated PACs for 2026 cycle.",
        "limit": "Not independently reconciled to committee receipts or later contributions. Do not label a September 2026 cumulative total.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-11-04",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-fairshake26"
        ],
        "financial": {
          "value": 23000000,
          "comparison": "greater_than",
          "currency": "USD",
          "kind": "additional donor-announced support",
          "period": "2026 election cycle",
          "restriction": null
        },
        "period": "2026 election cycle"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-machine",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-machine-age-fund",
      "label": "announces fund",
      "summary": "Firm announces $1.1bn raised for physical AI buildout.",
      "limit": "Fundraising, not a16z donating $1.1bn to itself or completed investment deployment. Overlap with January fund groups not reconciled.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-28",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-machine"
      ],
      "financialContext": {
        "value": 1100000000,
        "currency": "USD",
        "kind": "capital raised by announced fund"
      },
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-machine",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-machine-age-fund",
        "label": "announces fund",
        "summary": "Firm announces $1.1bn raised for physical AI buildout.",
        "limit": "Fundraising, not a16z donating $1.1bn to itself or completed investment deployment. Overlap with January fund groups not reconciled.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-28",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-machine"
        ],
        "financialContext": {
          "value": 1100000000,
          "currency": "USD",
          "kind": "capital raised by announced fund"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-volta",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-volta",
      "label": "co-leads Series A",
      "summary": "a16z announces co-leading Volta Series A; thesis is cloud operations plus project finance to extend compute access.",
      "limit": "Individual check, customer obligations, financing contracts and realized capacity not disclosed.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-04",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-volta"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-volta",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-volta",
        "label": "co-leads Series A",
        "summary": "a16z announces co-leading Volta Series A; thesis is cloud operations plus project finance to extend compute access.",
        "limit": "Individual check, customer obligations, financing contracts and realized capacity not disclosed.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-04",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-volta"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-openai",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "co-leads financing round",
      "summary": "OpenAI names a16z as co-lead in round containing $122bn committed capital.",
      "limit": "Whole-round capital is not a16z's contribution or proof all capital was disbursed. No a16z board/veto/safety-policy rights disclosed.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-31",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-openai"
      ],
      "financialContext": {
        "value": 122000000000,
        "currency": "USD",
        "kind": "entire round committed capital, not edge amount"
      },
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-openai",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "label": "co-leads financing round",
        "summary": "OpenAI names a16z as co-lead in round containing $122bn committed capital.",
        "limit": "Whole-round capital is not a16z's contribution or proof all capital was disbursed. No a16z board/veto/safety-policy rights disclosed.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-03-31",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-openai"
        ],
        "financialContext": {
          "value": 122000000000,
          "currency": "USD",
          "kind": "entire round committed capital, not edge amount"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-anduril",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "participates in Series D",
      "summary": "Anduril identifies a16z among investors in $450m Series D led by Elad Gil.",
      "limit": "Round amount not a16z check; no investor-specific rights disclosed. Historic financing, newly checked.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2021-06-17",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-anduril"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-anduril",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "label": "participates in Series D",
        "summary": "Anduril identifies a16z among investors in $450m Series D led by Elad Gil.",
        "limit": "Round amount not a16z check; no investor-specific rights disclosed. Historic financing, newly checked.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2021-06-17",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-anduril"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril",
      "source": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
      "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "participates in Series D",
      "summary": "Anduril names Founders Fund in same Series D as a16z.",
      "limit": "Co-investment is not common operational command or Peter Thiel personal giving. Historic financing, newly checked.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2021-06-17",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-anduril"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril",
        "source": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
        "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "label": "participates in Series D",
        "summary": "Anduril names Founders Fund in same Series D as a16z.",
        "limit": "Co-investment is not common operational command or Peter Thiel personal giving. Historic financing, newly checked.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2021-06-17",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-anduril"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai",
      "source": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "announces national-security AI collaboration",
      "summary": "Combines OpenAI models and Anduril Lattice/CUAS data for counter-drone applications and operator decision support.",
      "limit": "Public description, not complete contract or proof of all deployments; no tracing of a16z funds into specific work.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-12-04",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-anduril-openai"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai",
        "source": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "label": "announces national-security AI collaboration",
        "summary": "Combines OpenAI models and Anduril Lattice/CUAS data for counter-drone applications and operator decision support.",
        "limit": "Public description, not complete contract or proof of all deployments; no tracing of a16z funds into specific work.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-12-04",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-anduril-openai"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-ostp",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-ostp",
      "label": "submits AI Action Plan recommendations",
      "summary": "Formal AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission seeks federal preemption of state model-development restrictions and compute/talent investment, preserving state harm enforcement.",
      "limit": "Submitted institutional position is not adopted law or proof of causal influence. Source legal name differs from current corpus label; preserve brand mapping without inventing another donor.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "submitted",
      "eventDate": "2025-03-14",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-ostp"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-ostp",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-ostp",
        "label": "submits AI Action Plan recommendations",
        "summary": "Formal AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission seeks federal preemption of state model-development restrictions and compute/talent investment, preserving state harm enforcement.",
        "limit": "Submitted institutional position is not adopted law or proof of causal influence. Source legal name differs from current corpus label; preserve brand mapping without inventing another donor.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "submitted",
        "eventDate": "2025-03-14",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-ostp"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-msft-policy",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "microsoft",
      "label": "coauthors joint AI policy statement",
      "summary": "Andreessen/Horowitz and Nadella/Smith jointly publish AI for Startups, proposing collaboration across Little and Big Tech.",
      "limit": "Joint policy statement is not merger, investment, contract or complete policy alignment.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published",
      "eventDate": "2024-11-01",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-microsoft"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-msft-policy",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "microsoft",
        "label": "coauthors joint AI policy statement",
        "summary": "Andreessen/Horowitz and Nadella/Smith jointly publish AI for Startups, proposing collaboration across Little and Big Tech.",
        "limit": "Joint policy statement is not merger, investment, contract or complete policy alignment.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published",
        "eventDate": "2024-11-01",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-microsoft"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-e-defense",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-ndaa-procurement",
      "label": "runs public procurement-reform campaign",
      "summary": "Current campaign names House/Senate NDAA provisions for commercial acquisition, workforce and autonomous-system/munitions procurement.",
      "limit": "Undated page: exact bill-year and final enactment not audited. Advocacy presence not causal legislative success.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "observed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-marc-s-defense"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-e-defense",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-ndaa-procurement",
        "label": "runs public procurement-reform campaign",
        "summary": "Current campaign names House/Senate NDAA provisions for commercial acquisition, workforce and autonomous-system/munitions procurement.",
        "limit": "Undated page: exact bill-year and final enactment not audited. Advocacy presence not causal legislative success.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "observed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-marc-s-defense"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-ceo",
      "source": "w37-karp-alex",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Co-founder, CEO and director",
      "summary": "Karp is CEO since 2005 and director since 2003 according to the April 2026 proxy.",
      "limit": "Executive role does not establish command over government operations.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2005",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-ceo",
        "source": "w37-karp-alex",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Co-founder, CEO and director",
        "summary": "Karp is CEO since 2005 and director since 2003 according to the April 2026 proxy.",
        "limit": "Executive role does not establish command over government operations.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2005",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-chair",
      "source": "w37-karp-thiel",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Co-founder and chairman",
      "summary": "The April 2026 proxy identifies Thiel's formal board role.",
      "limit": "Chairmanship is distinct from individual majority ownership.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-chair",
        "source": "w37-karp-thiel",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Co-founder and chairman",
        "summary": "The April 2026 proxy identifies Thiel's formal board role.",
        "limit": "Chairmanship is distinct from individual majority ownership.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-president",
      "source": "w37-karp-cohen",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Co-founder, president and director",
      "summary": "Cohen holds these roles in the April 2026 proxy.",
      "limit": "A separate participant in corporate governance.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-president",
        "source": "w37-karp-cohen",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Co-founder, president and director",
        "summary": "Cohen holds these roles in the April 2026 proxy.",
        "limit": "A separate participant in corporate governance.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-instruction-alex",
      "source": "w37-karp-alex",
      "target": "w37-karp-trust",
      "label": "Founder instruction right",
      "summary": "Karp is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
      "limit": "No single founder can unilaterally direct this bloc while all three remain parties.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-instruction-alex",
        "source": "w37-karp-alex",
        "target": "w37-karp-trust",
        "label": "Founder instruction right",
        "summary": "Karp is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
        "limit": "No single founder can unilaterally direct this bloc while all three remain parties.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-instruction-thiel",
      "source": "w37-karp-thiel",
      "target": "w37-karp-trust",
      "label": "Founder instruction right",
      "summary": "Thiel is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
      "limit": "No single founder can unilaterally direct this bloc while all three remain parties.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-instruction-thiel",
        "source": "w37-karp-thiel",
        "target": "w37-karp-trust",
        "label": "Founder instruction right",
        "summary": "Thiel is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
        "limit": "No single founder can unilaterally direct this bloc while all three remain parties.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-instruction-cohen",
      "source": "w37-karp-cohen",
      "target": "w37-karp-trust",
      "label": "Founder instruction right",
      "summary": "Cohen is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
      "limit": "No single founder can unilaterally direct this bloc while all three remain parties.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-instruction-cohen",
        "source": "w37-karp-cohen",
        "target": "w37-karp-trust",
        "label": "Founder instruction right",
        "summary": "Cohen is one of the three current participants; the bloc requires at least two matching instructions.",
        "limit": "No single founder can unilaterally direct this bloc while all three remain parties.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-votes",
      "source": "w37-karp-trust",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Class F voting mechanism",
      "summary": "Subject to its threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999%.",
      "limit": "Not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes, or majority economic ownership.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-proxy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-votes",
        "source": "w37-karp-trust",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Class F voting mechanism",
        "summary": "Subject to its threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999%.",
        "limit": "Not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes, or majority economic ownership.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-proxy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-army-ea",
      "source": "w37-karp-army",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Up to $10bn purchasing capacity",
      "summary": "The July 2025 enterprise agreement consolidates 75 contracts for up to ten years.",
      "limit": "The Army expressly says the cap is not a specific obligation or commitment.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2025-07-31",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-army-ea"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-army-ea",
        "source": "w37-karp-army",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Up to $10bn purchasing capacity",
        "summary": "The July 2025 enterprise agreement consolidates 75 contracts for up to ten years.",
        "limit": "The Army expressly says the cap is not a specific obligation or commitment.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2025-07-31",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-army-ea"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-maven-first",
      "source": "w37-karp-army",
      "target": "w37-karp-usg",
      "label": "$480m Maven contract capacity",
      "summary": "May 2024 announcement: W911QX-24-D-0012; one bid; estimated completion 28 May 2029.",
      "limit": "Funding and locations are determined with each order; not a cash-disbursement figure.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-05-29",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-maven-2024"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-maven-first",
        "source": "w37-karp-army",
        "target": "w37-karp-usg",
        "label": "$480m Maven contract capacity",
        "summary": "May 2024 announcement: W911QX-24-D-0012; one bid; estimated completion 28 May 2029.",
        "limit": "Funding and locations are determined with each order; not a cash-disbursement figure.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-05-29",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-maven-2024"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-maven-mod",
      "source": "w37-karp-army",
      "target": "w37-karp-usg",
      "label": "$795m Maven modification",
      "summary": "P00005, awarded 20 May 2025 and announced the next day, adds software-license capacity under the same contract.",
      "limit": "Funding determined per order. Do not sum overlapping capacity and orders as spending.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "awarded",
      "eventDate": "2025-05-20",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-maven-2025"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-maven-mod",
        "source": "w37-karp-army",
        "target": "w37-karp-usg",
        "label": "$795m Maven modification",
        "summary": "P00005, awarded 20 May 2025 and announced the next day, adds software-license capacity under the same contract.",
        "limit": "Funding determined per order. Do not sum overlapping capacity and orders as spending.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "awarded",
        "eventDate": "2025-05-20",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-maven-2025"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-titan-p",
      "source": "w37-karp-army",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "$127m TITAN production order",
      "summary": "The Army's September announcement identifies this Palantir award; Palantir leads production.",
      "limit": "Order value, not cash spending. The combined $192m headline includes Anduril's separate share.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "awarded",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-31",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-titan"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-titan-p",
        "source": "w37-karp-army",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "$127m TITAN production order",
        "summary": "The Army's September announcement identifies this Palantir award; Palantir leads production.",
        "limit": "Order value, not cash spending. The combined $192m headline includes Anduril's separate share.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "awarded",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-31",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-titan"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-titan-a",
      "source": "w37-karp-army",
      "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "$65m TITAN production order",
      "summary": "Anduril receives the other production award; together the orders cover eight systems over eighteen months.",
      "limit": "Separate from Palantir's $127m award; not proof of disbursement.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "awarded",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-31",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-titan"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-titan-a",
        "source": "w37-karp-army",
        "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "label": "$65m TITAN production order",
        "summary": "Anduril receives the other production award; together the orders cover eight systems over eighteen months.",
        "limit": "Separate from Palantir's $127m award; not proof of disbursement.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "awarded",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-31",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-titan"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-nato",
      "source": "w37-karp-ncia",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Acquired MSS NATO",
      "summary": "Acquisition finalized 25 March 2025 for Allied Command Operations; announced 14 April.",
      "limit": "Price is not disclosed in this announcement; procurement is not transfer of command.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "acquired",
      "eventDate": "2025-03-25",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-nato"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-nato",
        "source": "w37-karp-ncia",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Acquired MSS NATO",
        "summary": "Acquisition finalized 25 March 2025 for Allied Command Operations; announced 14 April.",
        "limit": "Price is not disclosed in this announcement; procurement is not transfer of command.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "acquired",
        "eventDate": "2025-03-25",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-nato"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-ms",
      "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "target": "microsoft",
      "label": "Classified AI integration announced",
      "summary": "Foundry/AIP integration with Azure cloud and Azure OpenAI models was announced in August 2024.",
      "limit": "Availability was subject to government authorization and accreditation.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-08-08",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-ms"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-ms",
        "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "target": "microsoft",
        "label": "Classified AI integration announced",
        "summary": "Foundry/AIP integration with Azure cloud and Azure OpenAI models was announced in August 2024.",
        "limit": "Availability was subject to government authorization and accreditation.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-08-08",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-ms"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-openai",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "Azure OpenAI model distribution route",
      "summary": "The Microsoft–Palantir announcement explicitly names GPT-4 and other models through Azure OpenAI.",
      "limit": "This does not establish a direct OpenAI–Palantir contract, equity link or governance relationship.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-08-08",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-ms"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-openai",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "label": "Azure OpenAI model distribution route",
        "summary": "The Microsoft–Palantir announcement explicitly names GPT-4 and other models through Azure OpenAI.",
        "limit": "This does not establish a direct OpenAI–Palantir contract, equity link or governance relationship.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-08-08",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-ms"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-claude",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Claude integration announced",
      "summary": "The November 2024 issuer release combines Claude, AIP, SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment.",
      "limit": "Historical integration announcement; current deployment continuity is not established after the 2026 dispute. No equity terms disclosed.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-11-07",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-claude"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-claude",
        "source": "anthropic",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Claude integration announced",
        "summary": "The November 2024 issuer release combines Claude, AIP, SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment.",
        "limit": "Historical integration announcement; current deployment continuity is not established after the 2026 dispute. No equity terms disclosed.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-11-07",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-claude"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-aws",
      "source": "w37-karp-aws",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Hosting and SageMaker route",
      "summary": "AWS infrastructure is named in the Claude integration announcement.",
      "limit": "Hosting is distinct from ownership and operational military authority.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-11-07",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-claude"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-aws",
        "source": "w37-karp-aws",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Hosting and SageMaker route",
        "summary": "AWS infrastructure is named in the Claude integration announcement.",
        "limit": "Hosting is distinct from ownership and operational military authority.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-11-07",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-claude"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-fedramp",
      "source": "w37-karp-fedramp",
      "target": "w37-karp-pfcs",
      "label": "Federal cloud certification",
      "summary": "Official listing FR2434554673: certified since 19 November 2024; current Rev5 Class D High.",
      "limit": "Not an IL6 determination or approval of every model use.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "certified",
      "eventDate": "2024-11-19",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-fedramp"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-fedramp",
        "source": "w37-karp-fedramp",
        "target": "w37-karp-pfcs",
        "label": "Federal cloud certification",
        "summary": "Official listing FR2434554673: certified since 19 November 2024; current Rev5 Class D High.",
        "limit": "Not an IL6 determination or approval of every model use.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "certified",
        "eventDate": "2024-11-19",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-fedramp"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-anduril",
      "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "Lattice/Menace/AIP partnership",
      "summary": "December 2024 release announces data retention, AI training and deployment integration.",
      "limit": "An announced partnership plan does not prove deployment of every described component.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2024-12-06",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-anduril"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-anduril",
        "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "label": "Lattice/Menace/AIP partnership",
        "summary": "December 2024 release announces data retention, AI training and deployment integration.",
        "limit": "An announced partnership plan does not prove deployment of every described component.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2024-12-06",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-anduril"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-inaugural",
      "source": "w37-karp-alex",
      "target": "w37-karp-inaugural",
      "label": "$1m personal inaugural donation",
      "summary": "Received 17 December 2024; FEC transaction F132.147400953; page 150; image 202505029758922685.",
      "limit": "Not corporate money or a candidate campaign contribution; no exchanged favor established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "received",
      "eventDate": "2024-12-17",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-fec"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-inaugural",
        "source": "w37-karp-alex",
        "target": "w37-karp-inaugural",
        "label": "$1m personal inaugural donation",
        "summary": "Received 17 December 2024; FEC transaction F132.147400953; page 150; image 202505029758922685.",
        "limit": "Not corporate money or a candidate campaign contribution; no exchanged favor established.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "received",
        "eventDate": "2024-12-17",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-fec"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-pac",
      "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "target": "w37-karp-pac",
      "label": "Named PAC in corporate filing",
      "summary": "Palantir's year-end 2025 LD-203 separately names the Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC.",
      "limit": "PAC activity is not automatically corporate funds or Karp's personal decision.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2026-01-27",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-ld203"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-pac",
        "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "target": "w37-karp-pac",
        "label": "Named PAC in corporate filing",
        "summary": "Palantir's year-end 2025 LD-203 separately names the Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc. PAC.",
        "limit": "PAC activity is not automatically corporate funds or Karp's personal decision.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2026-01-27",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-ld203"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-reagan",
      "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "target": "w37-karp-reagan",
      "label": "$50,000 corporate contribution",
      "summary": "LD-203 lists a self-contribution on 16 December 2025 under presidential-library expenses.",
      "limit": "The recipient is Reagan's foundation, not Trump's; this is not a lobbying-expenditure total.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2025-12-16",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-ld203"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-reagan",
        "source": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "target": "w37-karp-reagan",
        "label": "$50,000 corporate contribution",
        "summary": "LD-203 lists a self-contribution on 16 December 2025 under presidential-library expenses.",
        "limit": "The recipient is Reagan's foundation, not Trump's; this is not a lobbying-expenditure total.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2025-12-16",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-ld203"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-sankar-role",
      "source": "w37-karp-sankar",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Chief Technology Officer",
      "summary": "His Senate written testimony identifies his corporate position.",
      "limit": "The following testimony is attributed to Sankar.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2025-01-28",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-senate"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-sankar-role",
        "source": "w37-karp-sankar",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Chief Technology Officer",
        "summary": "His Senate written testimony identifies his corporate position.",
        "limit": "The following testimony is attributed to Sankar.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2025-01-28",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-senate"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-sankar-testimony",
      "source": "w37-karp-sankar",
      "target": "w37-karp-sasc",
      "label": "Acquisition-reform testimony",
      "summary": "Sankar criticized procurement incentives and commended Wicker's reform work and the FORGED Act.",
      "limit": "Advocacy does not prove legislative authorship or enactment.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "testified",
      "eventDate": "2025-01-28",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-senate"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-sankar-testimony",
        "source": "w37-karp-sankar",
        "target": "w37-karp-sasc",
        "label": "Acquisition-reform testimony",
        "summary": "Sankar criticized procurement incentives and commended Wicker's reform work and the FORGED Act.",
        "limit": "Advocacy does not prove legislative authorship or enactment.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "testified",
        "eventDate": "2025-01-28",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-senate"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-a16z",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "Historical firm investment",
      "summary": "Marc Andreessen announced an Andreessen Horowitz investment in Anduril in October 2019.",
      "limit": "Group-level crosswalk only: existing a16z node is labeled a16z Capital Management. Exact investing entity, present stake and control rights are undisclosed.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "eventDate": "2019-10-03",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-a16z"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-a16z",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "label": "Historical firm investment",
        "summary": "Marc Andreessen announced an Andreessen Horowitz investment in Anduril in October 2019.",
        "limit": "Group-level crosswalk only: existing a16z node is labeled a16z Capital Management. Exact investing entity, present stake and control rights are undisclosed.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "eventDate": "2019-10-03",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-a16z"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-trae-fund",
      "source": "w37-karp-trae",
      "target": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
      "label": "Partner",
      "summary": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Stephens as its partner.",
      "limit": "Does not establish particular investment committee or ownership rights.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-trae"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-trae-fund",
        "source": "w37-karp-trae",
        "target": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
        "label": "Partner",
        "summary": "Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Stephens as its partner.",
        "limit": "Does not establish particular investment committee or ownership rights.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-trae"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-trae-anduril",
      "source": "w37-karp-trae",
      "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
      "label": "Co-founder and executive chairman",
      "summary": "The maintained biography identifies Stephens's Anduril role.",
      "limit": "Does not establish Karp's or Thiel's command over Anduril.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-trae"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-trae-anduril",
        "source": "w37-karp-trae",
        "target": "w37-marc-anduril",
        "label": "Co-founder and executive chairman",
        "summary": "The maintained biography identifies Stephens's Anduril role.",
        "limit": "Does not establish Karp's or Thiel's command over Anduril.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-trae"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-trae-palantir",
      "source": "w37-karp-trae",
      "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
      "label": "Historical employee",
      "summary": "Biography describes former Palantir intelligence/defense growth and product work.",
      "limit": "Historical employment, not a current Palantir role.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-trae"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-trae-palantir",
        "source": "w37-karp-trae",
        "target": "w37-karp-palantir",
        "label": "Historical employee",
        "summary": "Biography describes former Palantir intelligence/defense growth and product work.",
        "limit": "Historical employment, not a current Palantir role.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-trae"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-court-relief",
      "source": "w37-karp-court",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Designation and boycott vacated",
      "summary": "Docket 251 of 27 August 2026 vacates challenged measures and permanently enjoins specified implementation.",
      "limit": "Not every claim or defendant; separate procurement-security review remains.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "ordered",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-27",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-relief"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-court-relief",
        "source": "w37-karp-court",
        "target": "anthropic",
        "label": "Designation and boycott vacated",
        "summary": "Docket 251 of 27 August 2026 vacates challenged measures and permanently enjoins specified implementation.",
        "limit": "Not every claim or defendant; separate procurement-security review remains.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "ordered",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-27",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-relief"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-court-choice",
      "source": "w37-karp-court",
      "target": "w37-karp-dow",
      "label": "Lawful supplier choice preserved",
      "summary": "Paragraph 14 expressly allows lawful transition to another AI provider and does not require continued Anthropic use.",
      "limit": "The court decision does not establish restored contracts or particular deployments.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "ordered",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-27",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-relief"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-court-choice",
        "source": "w37-karp-court",
        "target": "w37-karp-dow",
        "label": "Lawful supplier choice preserved",
        "summary": "Paragraph 14 expressly allows lawful transition to another AI provider and does not require continued Anthropic use.",
        "limit": "The court decision does not establish restored contracts or particular deployments.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "ordered",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-27",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-relief"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w37-karp-dow",
      "label": "Contractual use limits; no technical veto",
      "summary": "The court's factual account describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual, without Anthropic visibility into DoW prompts or technical intervention in deployed behavior.",
      "limit": "Scoped to the court's described national-security deployment; not all Anthropic products. DoW controlled future deployment.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "court_finding",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-27",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-karp-s-opinion"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary",
        "source": "anthropic",
        "target": "w37-karp-dow",
        "label": "Contractual use limits; no technical veto",
        "summary": "The court's factual account describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual, without Anthropic visibility into DoW prompts or technical intervention in deployed behavior.",
        "limit": "Scoped to the court's described national-security deployment; not all Anthropic products. DoW controlled future deployment.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "court_finding",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-27",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-karp-s-opinion"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-e-cltr-commitment",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w36-cltr",
      "label": "£4m commitment plus matching offer",
      "summary": "CLTR’s report published in 2025 describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment and separate matching up to £3m.",
      "limit": "Recipient-reported commitments; not £7m of established receipts. Report states grant commitments deny influence over strategic priorities.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-policy-s-cltr-report"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-e-cltr-commitment",
        "source": "coefficient",
        "target": "w36-cltr",
        "label": "£4m commitment plus matching offer",
        "summary": "CLTR’s report published in 2025 describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment and separate matching up to £3m.",
        "limit": "Recipient-reported commitments; not £7m of established receipts. Report states grant commitments deny influence over strategic priorities.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-policy-s-cltr-report"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll",
      "source": "w36-cltr",
      "target": "w37-policy-public-first-uk",
      "label": "Commissioned 2024 AI opinion poll",
      "summary": "CLTR identifies Public First UK as its pollster for 2,011 UK adults surveyed 28 October–5 November 2024.",
      "limit": "Contract and fee not obtained. Distinct from US Public First Action.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-policy-s-cltr-report"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll",
        "source": "w36-cltr",
        "target": "w37-policy-public-first-uk",
        "label": "Commissioned 2024 AI opinion poll",
        "summary": "CLTR identifies Public First UK as its pollster for 2,011 UK adults surveyed 28 October–5 November 2024.",
        "limit": "Contract and fee not obtained. Distinct from US Public First Action.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-policy-s-cltr-report"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal",
      "source": "w36-cltr",
      "target": "w37-policy-cltr-architecture",
      "label": "Proposed government AI institutions",
      "summary": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation.",
      "limit": "Submission, not enactment or proof of government adoption.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": "2026-04-20",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-policy-s-cltr-submission",
        "w37-policy-s-cltr-index"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal",
        "source": "w36-cltr",
        "target": "w37-policy-cltr-architecture",
        "label": "Proposed government AI institutions",
        "summary": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation.",
        "limit": "Submission, not enactment or proof of government adoption.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": "2026-04-20",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-policy-s-cltr-submission",
          "w37-policy-s-cltr-index"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-e-stipend-operation",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "w37-policy-stipends",
      "label": "Sets eligibility and renewal conditions",
      "summary": "Published rules require signed agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities.",
      "limit": "No individual award, payment or termination case established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-policy-s-stipends"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-e-stipend-operation",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "w37-policy-stipends",
        "label": "Sets eligibility and renewal conditions",
        "summary": "Published rules require signed agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities.",
        "limit": "No individual award, payment or termination case established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-policy-s-stipends"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-e-micro-renewal",
      "source": "w36-pause-global",
      "target": "w36-microgrants",
      "label": "Makes future grants conditional on delivery",
      "summary": "Published microgrant rules connect future support to completion and reporting of agreed outputs.",
      "limit": "Different from a donor exercising control over PauseAI; awarded agreements not obtained.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w37-policy-s-microgrants"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-e-micro-renewal",
        "source": "w36-pause-global",
        "target": "w36-microgrants",
        "label": "Makes future grants conditional on delivery",
        "summary": "Published microgrant rules connect future support to completion and reporting of agreed outputs.",
        "limit": "Different from a donor exercising control over PauseAI; awarded agreements not obtained.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w37-policy-s-microgrants"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-e-ppf-tarbell",
      "source": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
      "target": "w36-tarbell",
      "label": "Named payment route for Tarbell support",
      "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger names Players Philanthropy Fund for two 2024 payments totaling $520,000 designated for Tarbell Fellowship.",
      "limit": "This is the same support already recorded from Tallinn, not another donation. A common sponsor does not establish joint editorial or campaign control.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "recorded",
      "eventDate": "2024",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w36-s-ledger"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-e-ppf-tarbell",
        "source": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
        "target": "w36-tarbell",
        "label": "Named payment route for Tarbell support",
        "summary": "Tallinn’s ledger names Players Philanthropy Fund for two 2024 payments totaling $520,000 designated for Tarbell Fellowship.",
        "limit": "This is the same support already recorded from Tallinn, not another donation. A common sponsor does not establish joint editorial or campaign control.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "recorded",
        "eventDate": "2024",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 12 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w36-s-ledger"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-q1-expenses",
      "source": "controlaius",
      "target": "w38-controlai-q1",
      "label": "Reports USD120,000 lobbying expenses",
      "summary": "Control AI US reports USD120,000 for Q1 2026 under Method A. The figure is a rounded expense estimate, not a donation to a politician.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported expense estimate",
      "recordedDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-lda-q1"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-q1-expenses",
        "source": "controlaius",
        "target": "w38-controlai-q1",
        "label": "Reports USD120,000 lobbying expenses",
        "summary": "Control AI US reports USD120,000 for Q1 2026 under Method A. The figure is a rounded expense estimate, not a donation to a politician.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "reported expense estimate",
        "eventDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-lda-q1"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-q2-expenses",
      "source": "controlaius",
      "target": "w38-controlai-q2",
      "label": "Reports USD80,000 lobbying expenses",
      "summary": "Control AI US reports USD80,000 for Q2 2026 under Method A. Keep the period separate from the July17 filing date.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported expense estimate",
      "recordedDate": "2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-lda-q2"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-q2-expenses",
        "source": "controlaius",
        "target": "w38-controlai-q2",
        "label": "Reports USD80,000 lobbying expenses",
        "summary": "Control AI US reports USD80,000 for Q2 2026 under Method A. Keep the period separate from the July17 filing date.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "reported expense estimate",
        "eventDate": "2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-04-01 to 2026-06-30; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-lda-q2"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-congress-lobbying",
      "source": "controlaius",
      "target": "w38-us-congress",
      "label": "Reports lobbying on ASI and loss-of-control risks",
      "summary": "Both quarterly reports name the Senate and House as lobbying audiences; neither identifies the officials contacted or attributes legislative wording.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported lobbying activity",
      "recordedDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-lda-q1",
        "w38-s-lda-q2"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-congress-lobbying",
        "source": "controlaius",
        "target": "w38-us-congress",
        "label": "Reports lobbying on ASI and loss-of-control risks",
        "summary": "Both quarterly reports name the Senate and House as lobbying audiences; neither identifies the officials contacted or attributes legislative wording.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "reported lobbying activity",
        "eventDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-lda-q1",
          "w38-s-lda-q2"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-max-lobbyist",
      "source": "w38-max-hz",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
      "summary": "The initial registration discloses prior congressional staff employment; both quarterly reports identify Hernandez-Zapata as a lobbyist.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported professional role",
      "recordedDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-lda-registration",
        "w38-s-lda-q1",
        "w38-s-lda-q2"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-max-lobbyist",
        "source": "w38-max-hz",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
        "summary": "The initial registration discloses prior congressional staff employment; both quarterly reports identify Hernandez-Zapata as a lobbyist.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "reported professional role",
        "eventDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-lda-registration",
          "w38-s-lda-q1",
          "w38-s-lda-q2"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-leahy-lobbyist",
      "source": "leahy",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
      "summary": "Connor Leahy appears in the lobbyist lists of both first-half 2026 reports.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported professional role",
      "recordedDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-lda-q1",
        "w38-s-lda-q2"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-leahy-lobbyist",
        "source": "leahy",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
        "summary": "Connor Leahy appears in the lobbyist lists of both first-half 2026 reports.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "reported professional role",
        "eventDate": "2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-lda-q1",
          "w38-s-lda-q2"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-morrison-client",
      "source": "w38-nathan-morrison",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "Registers consulting relationship",
      "summary": "Morrison registered Control AI US as his client on March19 and is listed among its Q2 lobbyists.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "registered client relationship",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-19",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-03-19; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-morrison-registration",
        "w38-s-lda-q2"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-morrison-client",
        "source": "w38-nathan-morrison",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "Registers consulting relationship",
        "summary": "Morrison registered Control AI US as his client on March19 and is listed among its Q2 lobbyists.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "registered client relationship",
        "eventDate": "2026-03-19",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-03-19; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-morrison-registration",
          "w38-s-lda-q2"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-sfr-foreign-interest",
      "source": "sfr",
      "target": "controlaius",
      "label": "Disclosed foreign-entity interest in lobbying",
      "summary": "The US filings identify Secure Future Research Ltd in their foreign-entity disclosures; the quarterly narrative calls its interest generalized. This is a specific disclosed UK-US link. The form provides several alternative grounds for listing.",
      "limit": "The form alone does not identify which statutory listing trigger applies, establish UK-government funding, or assign control of a particular campaign.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "filer-disclosed interest",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-lda-registration",
        "w38-s-lda-q1",
        "w38-s-lda-q2"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-sfr-foreign-interest",
        "source": "sfr",
        "target": "controlaius",
        "label": "Disclosed foreign-entity interest in lobbying",
        "summary": "The US filings identify Secure Future Research Ltd in their foreign-entity disclosures; the quarterly narrative calls its interest generalized. This is a specific disclosed UK-US link. The form provides several alternative grounds for listing.",
        "limit": "The form alone does not identify which statutory listing trigger applies, establish UK-government funding, or assign control of a particular campaign.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "filer-disclosed interest",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-lda-registration",
          "w38-s-lda-q1",
          "w38-s-lda-q2"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops",
      "source": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "target": "w9-assure-govops",
      "label": "Enacts verifier-designation duties",
      "summary": "SB813 assigns GovOps the development of qualification, suspension and termination criteria. Rules are due on or before January1,2028.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "enacted; implementation due 2028; general effective date 2027-01-01",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-sb813"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops",
        "source": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "target": "w9-assure-govops",
        "label": "would delegate verifier qualification and suspension procedures",
        "detail": "§8898.1 requirements by1January2028 if enacted; §8898.2 consultation/working groups. No enacted or exercised power established.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-status"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary",
      "source": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "target": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
      "label": "Preserves ability to operate without this audit route",
      "summary": "Section8898.4 does not require engagement of an IVO or a covered audit as a condition of developing, deploying or operating an AI system.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "enacted limitation; general effective date 2027-01-01",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-sb813"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary",
        "source": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "target": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
        "label": "would preserve operation without this verification route",
        "detail": "§8898.4(a)(3) rejects IVO/audit as condition of developing, deploying or operating AI in California. Does not negate other legal/commercial conditions; designation not model endorsement.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "policy",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees",
      "source": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
      "target": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
      "label": "May pay market rates; outcome-contingent fees barred",
      "summary": "The enacted criteria allow the assessed party to pay an IVO at reasonable market rates while requiring independence and forbidding fees contingent on the assessment result.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "enacted payment conditions; general effective date 2027-01-01",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-sb813"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees",
        "source": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
        "target": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
        "label": "would permit non-outcome-contingent market-rate fees",
        "detail": "§8898.1(c)(2)(C)-(D): assessed-party payment allowed without control over conclusions or outcome-contingent fees. Permitted class, no actual payment/fee schedule.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "money",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-ab-registry",
      "source": "w38-ab1405",
      "target": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
      "label": "Requires registry by January2029",
      "summary": "AB1405 requires GovOps to create an online AI-auditor registry and set annual fees no higher than reasonable administration costs.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "scheduled statutory deadline",
      "eventDate": "2029-01-01",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2029-01-01; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-ab1405"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-ab-registry",
        "source": "w38-ab1405",
        "target": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
        "label": "Requires registry by January2029",
        "summary": "AB1405 requires GovOps to create an online AI-auditor registry and set annual fees no higher than reasonable administration costs.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "scheduled statutory deadline",
        "eventDate": "2029-01-01",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2029-01-01; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-ab1405"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-govops-registry",
      "source": "w9-assure-govops",
      "target": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
      "label": "Administers registration and misconduct channel",
      "summary": "GovOps receives registration information, can investigate violations, remove auditors from the registry and refer matters for enforcement.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "enacted duties; implementation scheduled",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-ab1405"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-govops-registry",
        "source": "w9-assure-govops",
        "target": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
        "label": "Administers registration and misconduct channel",
        "summary": "GovOps receives registration information, can investigate violations, remove auditors from the registry and refer matters for enforcement.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "enacted duties; implementation scheduled",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-ab1405"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-accountancy-route",
      "source": "w38-ab1405",
      "target": "w38-ca-accountancy",
      "label": "Uses existing accountancy oversight",
      "summary": "Specified qualified accountancy work can satisfy parts of AB1405 through professional standards. GovOps must refer covered accountant misconduct findings to the Board for investigation and a report.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "enacted professional-equivalence route",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-ab1405"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-accountancy-route",
        "source": "w38-ab1405",
        "target": "w38-ca-accountancy",
        "label": "Uses existing accountancy oversight",
        "summary": "Specified qualified accountancy work can satisfy parts of AB1405 through professional standards. GovOps must refer covered accountant misconduct findings to the Board for investigation and a report.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "enacted professional-equivalence route",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-ab1405"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-openai-sb",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "label": "Publicly endorses auditor legislation",
      "summary": "OpenAI endorsed SB813 as a route to qualified independent assessment.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published endorsement",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-openai-policy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-openai-sb",
        "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "target": "w9-assure-sb813",
        "label": "Publicly endorses auditor legislation",
        "summary": "OpenAI endorsed SB813 as a route to qualified independent assessment.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published endorsement",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-openai-policy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-openai-ab",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w38-ab1405",
      "label": "Publicly endorses auditor registration",
      "summary": "OpenAI endorsed AB1405 registration, independence and accountability requirements.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published endorsement",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-openai-policy"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-openai-ab",
        "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "target": "w38-ab1405",
        "label": "Publicly endorses auditor registration",
        "summary": "OpenAI endorsed AB1405 registration, independence and accountability requirements.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published endorsement",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-09; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-openai-policy"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-anthropic-review",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w38-embedded-review",
      "label": "Commits to ongoing outside evaluator access",
      "summary": "Amodei commits Anthropic to employee-like reviewer access and publication rights subject to specified redactions. No installed team or executed contract was established.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced commitment",
      "eventDate": "2026-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-dario-pacing"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-anthropic-review",
        "source": "anthropic",
        "target": "w38-embedded-review",
        "label": "Commits to ongoing outside evaluator access",
        "summary": "Amodei commits Anthropic to employee-like reviewer access and publication rights subject to specified redactions. No installed team or executed contract was established.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced commitment",
        "eventDate": "2026-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-dario-pacing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo",
      "source": "w9-assure-govops",
      "target": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
      "label": "Must develop verifier qualification and removal procedures",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "enacted; general effective date 2027-01-01; rules due 2028",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "Enacted 9 September2026; general effect January2027; rules due January2028.",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-sb813"
      ],
      "summary": "SB813 assigns GovOps qualification, suspension and termination procedures for independent verification organizations, due by January1,2028. This is an enacted assignment; no specific designation is established.",
      "limit": "",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo",
        "source": "w9-assure-govops",
        "target": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
        "label": "would apply qualification and independence requirements",
        "detail": "§§8898.1-3 address expertise/conflicts, methods/reporting and operational independence. No named private appointee or veto. No bespoke appeal specified; other remedies unassessed.",
        "date": "",
        "status": "documented",
        "type": "governance",
        "evidence": "",
        "mechanism": "",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled"
        ],
        "facts": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-e-wells-negotiation",
      "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
      "target": "w10-duty-draft2026",
      "label": "Offers negotiation on Parliament deciding new harms",
      "summary": "On 13 September2026, Anika Wells offered to negotiate wording that would give Parliament a role in deciding new duty-of-care harm categories, while retaining an urgent-response mechanism. She was answering David Speers on ABC Insiders. This is a public negotiating position: the revised or introduced bill must establish whether and how the proposed ministerial power changes.",
      "limit": "No agreed amendment or enacted change established by the interview.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "public negotiating offer",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-13",
      "recordedDate": "Official interview dated 13 September2026.",
      "sources": [
        "w38-s-wells"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-e-wells-negotiation",
        "source": "w10-duty-minister-role",
        "target": "w10-duty-draft2026",
        "label": "Offers negotiation on Parliament deciding new harms",
        "summary": "On 13 September2026, Anika Wells offered to negotiate wording that would give Parliament a role in deciding new duty-of-care harm categories, while retaining an urgent-response mechanism. She was answering David Speers on ABC Insiders. This is a public negotiating position: the revised or introduced bill must establish whether and how the proposed ministerial power changes.",
        "limit": "No agreed amendment or enacted change established by the interview.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "public negotiating offer",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-13",
        "recordedDate": "Official interview dated 13 September2026.",
        "sources": [
          "w38-s-wells"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-grant",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w39-pliny",
      "label": "Announces Open Source AI Grant",
      "summary": "The June26,2025 cohort announcement names Pliny. The program describes grants rather than investments; recipient-specific value is undisclosed.",
      "limit": "Announcement date, not a proven payment date. No amount or governance rights established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-06-26",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-06-26; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-a16z-grant"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-grant",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w39-pliny",
        "label": "Announces Open Source AI Grant",
        "summary": "The June26,2025 cohort announcement names Pliny. The program describes grants rather than investments; recipient-specific value is undisclosed.",
        "limit": "Announcement date, not a proven payment date. No amount or governance rights established.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-06-26",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-06-26; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-a16z-grant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-reported-personal-grant",
      "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "target": "w39-pliny",
      "label": "Reported unrestricted grant",
      "summary": "TIME reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. This may describe the a16z cohort award already mapped; it is not counted as a second transfer.",
      "limit": "Possible duplicate description of the a16z award. Grant amount and precise donor instrument remain unresolved.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "reported relationship",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-time-pliny"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-reported-personal-grant",
        "source": "w37-marc-andreessen",
        "target": "w39-pliny",
        "label": "Reported unrestricted grant",
        "summary": "TIME reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. This may describe the a16z cohort award already mapped; it is not counted as a second transfer.",
        "limit": "Possible duplicate description of the a16z award. Grant amount and precise donor instrument remain unresolved.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "reported relationship",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-time-pliny"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-reported-contracts",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w39-pliny",
      "label": "Reported short-term research contracts",
      "summary": "TIME reports short-term OpenAI contracts with Pliny. Contract values, terms and timing were not obtained.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "reported relationship",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-time-pliny"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-reported-contracts",
        "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "target": "w39-pliny",
        "label": "Reported short-term research contracts",
        "summary": "TIME reports short-term OpenAI contracts with Pliny. Contract values, terms and timing were not obtained.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "reported relationship",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-time-pliny"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-pliny-bt6",
      "source": "w39-pliny",
      "target": "w39-bt6",
      "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
      "summary": "The Latent Space interview introduces Pliny and John V as leaders of BT6.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-latent-interview"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-pliny-bt6",
        "source": "w39-pliny",
        "target": "w39-bt6",
        "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
        "summary": "The Latent Space interview introduces Pliny and John V as leaders of BT6.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-latent-interview"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-john-bt6",
      "source": "w39-john-v",
      "target": "w39-bt6",
      "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
      "summary": "John V appears alongside Pliny in the BT6 interview and publishes an operator list.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-latent-interview",
        "w39-s-john-roster"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-john-bt6",
        "source": "w39-john-v",
        "target": "w39-bt6",
        "label": "Publicly described as a leader",
        "summary": "John V appears alongside Pliny in the BT6 interview and publishes an operator list.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-latent-interview",
          "w39-s-john-roster"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-pliny-community",
      "source": "w39-pliny",
      "target": "w39-basi",
      "label": "Links public community",
      "summary": "Pliny’s public project hub directs readers to the BASI community.",
      "limit": "Date of observation, not the community founding date.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-13; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-pliny-projects"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-pliny-community",
        "source": "w39-pliny",
        "target": "w39-basi",
        "label": "Links public community",
        "summary": "Pliny’s public project hub directs readers to the BASI community.",
        "limit": "Date of observation, not the community founding date.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-09-13; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-pliny-projects"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-john-lysios",
      "source": "w39-john-v",
      "target": "w39-lysios",
      "label": "Listed as AI red-team specialist",
      "summary": "TrojAI’s organizer page identifies John Vaina with Lysios.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-trojai-panel"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-john-lysios",
        "source": "w39-john-v",
        "target": "w39-lysios",
        "label": "Listed as AI red-team specialist",
        "summary": "TrojAI’s organizer page identifies John Vaina with Lysios.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-trojai-panel"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-operator-credit",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w39-lysios",
      "label": "Credits external red teaming: Operator",
      "summary": "OpenAI names Lysios LLC among the red-teaming organizations in the Operator System Card.",
      "limit": "System-card publication date; acknowledgment is not a disclosed payment.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-01-23",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-01-23; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-operator"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-operator-credit",
        "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "target": "w39-lysios",
        "label": "Credits external red teaming: Operator",
        "summary": "OpenAI names Lysios LLC among the red-teaming organizations in the Operator System Card.",
        "limit": "System-card publication date; acknowledgment is not a disclosed payment.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-01-23",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-01-23; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-operator"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-deep-credit",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w39-lysios",
      "label": "Credits external red teaming: Deep Research",
      "summary": "Lysios LLC appears in the Deep Research System Card acknowledgments, section5.",
      "limit": "The PDF has later revisions; its February2025 cover date does not date the first appearance of this credit.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-deep-research"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-deep-credit",
        "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
        "target": "w39-lysios",
        "label": "Credits external red teaming: Deep Research",
        "summary": "Lysios LLC appears in the Deep Research System Card acknowledgments, section5.",
        "limit": "The PDF has later revisions; its February2025 cover date does not date the first appearance of this credit.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-deep-research"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster",
      "source": "w39-philip-dursey",
      "target": "w39-bt6",
      "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
      "summary": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Philip A. Dursey.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-john-roster"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster",
        "source": "w39-philip-dursey",
        "target": "w39-bt6",
        "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
        "summary": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Philip A. Dursey.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-john-roster"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster",
      "source": "w39-marco-figueroa",
      "target": "w39-bt6",
      "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
      "summary": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Marco Figueroa.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-john-roster"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster",
        "source": "w39-marco-figueroa",
        "target": "w39-bt6",
        "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
        "summary": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Marco Figueroa.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-john-roster"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-joey-melo-roster",
      "source": "w39-joey-melo",
      "target": "w39-bt6",
      "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
      "summary": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Joey Melo.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-john-roster"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-joey-melo-roster",
        "source": "w39-joey-melo",
        "target": "w39-bt6",
        "label": "Listed as BT6 operator",
        "summary": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Joey Melo.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-09-12; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-john-roster"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-dursey-hypergame",
      "source": "w39-philip-dursey",
      "target": "w39-hypergame",
      "label": "Publisher identifies founder and CEO",
      "summary": "Dursey’s publisher biography identifies him as HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "reported relationship",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-dursey-book"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-dursey-hypergame",
        "source": "w39-philip-dursey",
        "target": "w39-hypergame",
        "label": "Publisher identifies founder and CEO",
        "summary": "Dursey’s publisher biography identifies him as HYPERGAME founder and CEO.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "reported relationship",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-dursey-book"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-dursey-book",
      "source": "w39-philip-dursey",
      "target": "w39-red-teaming-ai",
      "label": "Named author",
      "summary": "No Starch Press lists Philip A. Dursey as the author of Red Teaming AI.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-dursey-book"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-dursey-book",
        "source": "w39-philip-dursey",
        "target": "w39-red-teaming-ai",
        "label": "Named author",
        "summary": "No Starch Press lists Philip A. Dursey as the author of Red Teaming AI.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-dursey-book"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-marco-0din",
      "source": "w39-marco-figueroa",
      "target": "w39-0din",
      "label": "Listed as program manager",
      "summary": "TrojAI identifies Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla’s GenAI bug-bounty program manager.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-trojai-panel"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-marco-0din",
        "source": "w39-marco-figueroa",
        "target": "w39-0din",
        "label": "Listed as program manager",
        "summary": "TrojAI identifies Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla’s GenAI bug-bounty program manager.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-trojai-panel"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-pliny-venom",
      "source": "w39-pliny",
      "target": "w39-basilisk-venom",
      "label": "Coauthors research report",
      "summary": "The February6,2025 article names Pliny the Liberator as coauthor.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-02-06",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-basilisk-venom"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-pliny-venom",
        "source": "w39-pliny",
        "target": "w39-basilisk-venom",
        "label": "Coauthors research report",
        "summary": "The February6,2025 article names Pliny the Liberator as coauthor.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-02-06",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-basilisk-venom"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-venom",
      "source": "w39-marco-figueroa",
      "target": "w39-basilisk-venom",
      "label": "Coauthors research report",
      "summary": "The February6,2025 article names Marco Figueroa as coauthor.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-02-06",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-basilisk-venom"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-venom",
        "source": "w39-marco-figueroa",
        "target": "w39-basilisk-venom",
        "label": "Coauthors research report",
        "summary": "The February6,2025 article names Marco Figueroa as coauthor.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-02-06",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-basilisk-venom"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-0din-venom",
      "source": "w39-0din",
      "target": "w39-basilisk-venom",
      "label": "Publishes research report",
      "summary": "0DIN hosts the Basilisk Venom article and its authors’ interpretation of model behavior.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-02-06",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-basilisk-venom"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-0din-venom",
        "source": "w39-0din",
        "target": "w39-basilisk-venom",
        "label": "Publishes research report",
        "summary": "0DIN hosts the Basilisk Venom article and its authors’ interpretation of model behavior.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-02-06",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-02-06; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-basilisk-venom"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-pangea-winner",
      "source": "w39-pangea",
      "target": "w39-joey-melo",
      "label": "Names overall challenge winner",
      "summary": "Pangea identifies Melo as overall winner of its $10,000 AI challenge, with top scores in all three rooms.",
      "limit": "Organizer result announcement; the source is not a prize-payment receipt.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2025-04-18",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-04-18; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-pangea"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-pangea-winner",
        "source": "w39-pangea",
        "target": "w39-joey-melo",
        "label": "Names overall challenge winner",
        "summary": "Pangea identifies Melo as overall winner of its $10,000 AI challenge, with top scores in all three rooms.",
        "limit": "Organizer result announcement; the source is not a prize-payment receipt.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2025-04-18",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2025-04-18; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-pangea"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-sans-speaker",
      "source": "w39-sans",
      "target": "w39-pliny",
      "label": "Announces keynote speaker",
      "summary": "SANS announced Pliny as a keynote for its April20-21,2026 AI security summit.",
      "limit": "Speaker announcement; attendance not verified.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": "2026-02-25",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-02-25; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-sans"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-sans-speaker",
        "source": "w39-sans",
        "target": "w39-pliny",
        "label": "Announces keynote speaker",
        "summary": "SANS announced Pliny as a keynote for its April20-21,2026 AI security summit.",
        "limit": "Speaker announcement; attendance not verified.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": "2026-02-25",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-02-25; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-sans"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-libertas-publisher",
      "source": "w39-pliny",
      "target": "w39-libertas",
      "label": "Lists public research project",
      "summary": "Pliny’s project hub links L1B3RT4S / Libertas.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-pliny-projects"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-libertas-publisher",
        "source": "w39-pliny",
        "target": "w39-libertas",
        "label": "Lists public research project",
        "summary": "Pliny’s project hub links L1B3RT4S / Libertas.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-pliny-projects"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-e-w39-claritas-publisher",
      "source": "w39-pliny",
      "target": "w39-claritas",
      "label": "Lists public research project",
      "summary": "Pliny’s project hub links CL4R1T4S / Claritas.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented public record",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w39-s-pliny-projects"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-e-w39-claritas-publisher",
        "source": "w39-pliny",
        "target": "w39-claritas",
        "label": "Lists public research project",
        "summary": "Pliny’s project hub links CL4R1T4S / Claritas.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented public record",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 13 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w39-s-pliny-projects"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-launch",
      "source": "w40-elsayed",
      "target": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
      "label": "Publishes campaign platform",
      "summary": "The campaign released AI Under Democracy on June29,2026.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published advocacy",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-elsayed-launch"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-launch",
        "source": "w40-elsayed",
        "target": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
        "label": "Publishes campaign platform",
        "summary": "The campaign released AI Under Democracy on June29,2026.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published advocacy",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-elsayed-launch"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-board-proposal",
      "source": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
      "target": "w40-public-board-majority",
      "label": "Would require majority public seats",
      "summary": "Proposed board rule: 50%+1 of seats publicly appointed or elected.",
      "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposal published",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-elsayed-platform"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-board-proposal",
        "source": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
        "target": "w40-public-board-majority",
        "label": "Would require majority public seats",
        "summary": "Proposed board rule: 50%+1 of seats publicly appointed or elected.",
        "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposal published",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-elsayed-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-testing-proposal",
      "source": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
      "target": "w40-testing-agency",
      "label": "Would create independent testing agency",
      "summary": "The platform calls for predeployment evaluation outside the developer.",
      "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposal published",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-elsayed-platform"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-testing-proposal",
        "source": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
        "target": "w40-testing-agency",
        "label": "Would create independent testing agency",
        "summary": "The platform calls for predeployment evaluation outside the developer.",
        "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposal published",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-elsayed-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-supports-wealth",
      "source": "w40-elsayed",
      "target": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
      "label": "Publicly supports Sanders proposal",
      "summary": "El-Sayed’s platform explicitly supports Sanders’s public-ownership proposal.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published endorsement",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-elsayed-launch",
        "w40-s-elsayed-platform"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-supports-wealth",
        "source": "w40-elsayed",
        "target": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
        "label": "Publicly supports Sanders proposal",
        "summary": "El-Sayed’s platform explicitly supports Sanders’s public-ownership proposal.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "published endorsement",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-29",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-29; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-elsayed-launch",
          "w40-s-elsayed-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-announces-wealth",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
      "label": "Announces legislation",
      "summary": "Sanders’s office announced introduction on June18; the linked text retains blank procedural fields.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced legislative proposal",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-sanders-announcement",
        "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-announces-wealth",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
        "label": "Announces legislation",
        "summary": "Sanders’s office announced introduction on June18; the linked text retains blank procedural fields.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced legislative proposal",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-sanders-announcement",
          "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-establish-fund",
      "source": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
      "target": "w40-ai-public-fund",
      "label": "Would establish public equity fund",
      "summary": "The proposal would collect newly issued equity leaving the public holder with 50% after remittance.",
      "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposal published",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-establish-fund",
        "source": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
        "target": "w40-ai-public-fund",
        "label": "Would establish public equity fund",
        "summary": "The proposal would collect newly issued equity leaving the public holder with 50% after remittance.",
        "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposal published",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-establish-commission",
      "source": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
      "target": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
      "label": "Would establish Treasury commission",
      "summary": "Seven commissioners would be presidentially appointed with Senate confirmation through specified congressional nomination lists.",
      "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposal published",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-establish-commission",
        "source": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
        "target": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
        "label": "Would establish Treasury commission",
        "summary": "Seven commissioners would be presidentially appointed with Senate confirmation through specified congressional nomination lists.",
        "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposal published",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-manage-vote",
      "source": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
      "target": "w40-ai-public-fund",
      "label": "Would manage fund and exercise rights",
      "summary": "The commission would exercise the fund’s voting rights and designate board representatives within its shareholding entitlement.",
      "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposal published",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-manage-vote",
        "source": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
        "target": "w40-ai-public-fund",
        "label": "Would manage fund and exercise rights",
        "summary": "The commission would exercise the fund’s voting rights and designate board representatives within its shareholding entitlement.",
        "limit": "Proposed arrangement; no implementation established.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposal published",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-e-fund-operations",
      "source": "w40-ai-public-fund",
      "target": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
      "label": "Would finance commission operations",
      "summary": "The draft assigns commission operating costs to the fund’s assets and income.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed funding rule",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-e-fund-operations",
        "source": "w40-ai-public-fund",
        "target": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
        "label": "Would finance commission operations",
        "summary": "The draft assigns commission operating costs to the fund’s assets and income.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed funding rule",
        "eventDate": "2026-06-18",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-06-18; checked 13 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w40-s-wealth-fund-text"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-cotra-coefficient",
      "source": "w34-sanders-cotra",
      "target": "coefficient",
      "label": "Former programme and strategy roles",
      "summary": "Technical AI safety leadership in 2024; AI giving strategy in 2025.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical roles",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-cotra"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-cotra-coefficient",
        "source": "w34-sanders-cotra",
        "target": "coefficient",
        "label": "Former programme and strategy roles",
        "summary": "Technical AI safety leadership in 2024; AI giving strategy in 2025.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "historical roles",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-cotra"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-benton-anthropic",
      "source": "w41-benton",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Former Scalable Oversight manager",
      "summary": "Also led Anthropic Fellows research.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "former employment",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-joe"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-benton-anthropic",
        "source": "w41-benton",
        "target": "anthropic",
        "label": "Former Scalable Oversight manager",
        "summary": "Also led Anthropic Fellows research.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "former employment",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-joe"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-benton-metr",
      "source": "w41-benton",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Plans to join",
      "summary": "Biography says he will soon join; start unconfirmed.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced future role",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-joe"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-benton-metr",
        "source": "w41-benton",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Plans to join",
        "summary": "Biography says he will soon join; start unconfirmed.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced future role",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-joe"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-benton-uk",
      "source": "w41-benton",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Helped establish predecessor taskforce",
      "summary": "Reports helping set up the UK Frontier AI Taskforce.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical taskforce role",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-joe"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-benton-uk",
        "source": "w41-benton",
        "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
        "label": "Helped establish predecessor taskforce",
        "summary": "Reports helping set up the UK Frontier AI Taskforce.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "historical taskforce role",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-joe"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-arc-spinoff",
      "source": "w41-arc",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Incubated before announced spin-off",
      "summary": "Announced standalone nonprofit separation.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "spin-off announcement",
      "eventDate": "2023-12-04",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2023-12-04; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-spin"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-arc-spinoff",
        "source": "w41-arc",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Incubated before announced spin-off",
        "summary": "Announced standalone nonprofit separation.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "spin-off announcement",
        "eventDate": "2023-12-04",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2023-12-04; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-spin"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-audacious-canary",
      "source": "w41-audacious",
      "target": "w41-canary",
      "label": "Catalyzed approximately $38m",
      "summary": "Overall project funding announced in 2024.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced funding",
      "eventDate": "2024-10-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-canary"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-audacious-canary",
        "source": "w41-audacious",
        "target": "w41-canary",
        "label": "Catalyzed approximately $38m",
        "summary": "Overall project funding announced in 2024.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced funding",
        "eventDate": "2024-10-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-canary"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-canary-metr",
      "source": "w41-canary",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Approximately $17m for METR",
      "summary": "Part of the $38m package, not additional funding.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced allocation",
      "eventDate": "2024-10-09",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-canary"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-canary-metr",
        "source": "w41-canary",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Approximately $17m for METR",
        "summary": "Part of the $38m package, not additional funding.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced allocation",
        "eventDate": "2024-10-09",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2024-10-09; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-canary"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-rand-canary",
      "source": "w41-rand",
      "target": "w41-canary",
      "label": "Research collaborator",
      "summary": "Contributes policy and misuse evaluation work.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented relationship",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-rand"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-rand-canary",
        "source": "w41-rand",
        "target": "w41-canary",
        "label": "Research collaborator",
        "summary": "Contributes policy and misuse evaluation work.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented relationship",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-rand"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-gates-audacious",
      "source": "w41-gates",
      "target": "w41-audacious",
      "label": "Named funding-collective participant",
      "summary": "Named in METR’s 2024 account of the wider collective.",
      "limit": "Gates-specific Canary contribution not identified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical collective membership",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-canary"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-gates-audacious",
        "source": "w41-gates",
        "target": "w41-audacious",
        "label": "Named funding-collective participant",
        "summary": "Named in METR’s 2024 account of the wider collective.",
        "limit": "Gates-specific Canary contribution not identified.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "historical collective membership",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-canary"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-commitments",
      "source": "w41-commitments",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Approximately $71m committed",
      "summary": "Raised over preceding six months; donor shares unspecified.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "aggregate commitments announced",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-14",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-08-14; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-funding"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-commitments",
        "source": "w41-commitments",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Approximately $71m committed",
        "summary": "Raised over preceding six months; donor shares unspecified.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "aggregate commitments announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-08-14",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-08-14; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-schmidt",
      "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
      "summary": "Named among supporters over the years.",
      "limit": "Amount and payment date unspecified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-funding"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-schmidt",
        "source": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
        "summary": "Named among supporters over the years.",
        "limit": "Amount and payment date unspecified.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-packard",
      "source": "w27-roost-packard",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
      "summary": "Named among supporters over the years.",
      "limit": "Amount and payment date unspecified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-funding"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-packard",
        "source": "w27-roost-packard",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
        "summary": "Named among supporters over the years.",
        "limit": "Amount and payment date unspecified.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-longview",
      "source": "longview",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
      "summary": "Named among supporters over the years.",
      "limit": "Amount and payment date unspecified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-funding"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-longview",
        "source": "longview",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Acknowledged supporter",
        "summary": "Named among supporters over the years.",
        "limit": "Amount and payment date unspecified.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-uk-support",
      "source": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Acknowledged supporter and partner",
      "summary": "METR lists AISI support and partnership.",
      "limit": "Amount and terms unspecified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-about"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-uk-support",
        "source": "w41-uk-aisi",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Acknowledged supporter and partner",
        "summary": "METR lists AISI support and partnership.",
        "limit": "Amount and terms unspecified.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recipient acknowledgment",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-about"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-eu-contract",
      "source": "w41-eu-ai-office",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Technical-assistance contract",
      "summary": "Supports methods for assessing loss-of-control risks.",
      "limit": "Value and terms not recovered.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract disclosed",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-about"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-eu-contract",
        "source": "w41-eu-ai-office",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Technical-assistance contract",
        "summary": "Supports methods for assessing loss-of-control risks.",
        "limit": "Value and terms not recovered.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "contract disclosed",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-about"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-lab-access",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Provides access and tokens",
      "summary": "METR acknowledges in-kind evaluation resources.",
      "limit": "Value and publication rights not disclosed here.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "in-kind resources",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-about"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-lab-access",
        "source": "anthropic",
        "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "label": "Provides access and tokens",
        "summary": "METR acknowledges in-kind evaluation resources.",
        "limit": "Value and publication rights not disclosed here.",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "in-kind resources",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-about"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-rsp-origin",
      "source": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "target": "w41-rsp",
      "label": "Prototypes scaling policy",
      "summary": "ARC Evals, METR’s predecessor, presented voluntary commitments as a testbed for regulation.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "framework published",
      "eventDate": "2023-09-26",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2023-09-26; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-rsp"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-rsp-origin",
        "source": "w34-sanders-metr",
        "target": "w41-rsp",
        "label": "Prototypes scaling policy",
        "summary": "ARC Evals, METR’s predecessor, presented voluntary commitments as a testbed for regulation.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "framework published",
        "eventDate": "2023-09-26",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2023-09-26; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-rsp"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-rand-open",
      "source": "w41-rand",
      "target": "w41-open-evaluations",
      "label": "Publishes evaluation proposal",
      "summary": "Authors propose tests adapted to open-model release.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposal published",
      "eventDate": "2026-05-04",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-04; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-open"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-rand-open",
        "source": "w41-rand",
        "target": "w41-open-evaluations",
        "label": "Publishes evaluation proposal",
        "summary": "Authors propose tests adapted to open-model release.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposal published",
        "eventDate": "2026-05-04",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-04; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-open"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-gates-partner",
      "source": "w41-gates",
      "target": "w41-gates-anthropic",
      "label": "Joint programme partner",
      "summary": "Combined $200m package over four years.",
      "limit": "Programme total, not a Gates-to-Anthropic transfer.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "joint commitment announced",
      "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-gates"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-gates-partner",
        "source": "w41-gates",
        "target": "w41-gates-anthropic",
        "label": "Joint programme partner",
        "summary": "Combined $200m package over four years.",
        "limit": "Programme total, not a Gates-to-Anthropic transfer.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "joint commitment announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-gates"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-anthropic-partner",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w41-gates-anthropic",
      "label": "Joint programme partner",
      "summary": "Credits and technical support within the same package.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "joint commitment announced",
      "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-anthropic"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-anthropic-partner",
        "source": "anthropic",
        "target": "w41-gates-anthropic",
        "label": "Joint programme partner",
        "summary": "Credits and technical support within the same package.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "joint commitment announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-anthropic"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-idm-internal",
      "source": "w41-gates",
      "target": "w41-idm",
      "label": "Includes research group",
      "summary": "IDM identified as part of Gates Foundation.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented relationship",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-anthropic"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-idm-internal",
        "source": "w41-gates",
        "target": "w41-idm",
        "label": "Includes research group",
        "summary": "IDM identified as part of Gates Foundation.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "documented relationship",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-anthropic"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-idm-integration",
      "source": "w41-gates-anthropic",
      "target": "w41-idm",
      "label": "Plans forecasting integration",
      "summary": "Claude integration for accessible disease forecasts.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced integration",
      "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-anthropic"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-idm-integration",
        "source": "w41-gates-anthropic",
        "target": "w41-idm",
        "label": "Plans forecasting integration",
        "summary": "Claude integration for accessible disease forecasts.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced integration",
        "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-anthropic"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-e-ihme-integration",
      "source": "w41-gates-anthropic",
      "target": "w41-ihme",
      "label": "Names health-data collaboration",
      "summary": "Work involving Global Burden of Disease study.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced collaboration",
      "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
      "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
      "sources": [
        "w41-s-gates"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-e-ihme-integration",
        "source": "w41-gates-anthropic",
        "target": "w41-ihme",
        "label": "Names health-data collaboration",
        "summary": "Work involving Global Burden of Disease study.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "implementation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced collaboration",
        "eventDate": "2026-05-14",
        "recordedDate": "Event or period: 2026-05-14; checked 14 September 2026",
        "sources": [
          "w41-s-gates"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-release",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Announces coalition declaration",
      "summary": "FLI published the coalition announcement on March 4.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announcement",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-04",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-march"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-release",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Announces coalition declaration",
        "summary": "FLI published the coalition announcement on March 4.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announcement",
        "eventDate": "2026-03-04",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-march"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-bannon-endorses",
      "source": "w42-bannon",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Named as endorser",
      "summary": "FLI’s March announcement already names Bannon.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed endorsement",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-04",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-march"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-bannon-endorses",
        "source": "w42-bannon",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Named as endorser",
        "summary": "FLI’s March announcement already names Bannon.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "listed endorsement",
        "eventDate": "2026-03-04",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-march"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-controlai-endorses",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
      "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed endorsement",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-declaration"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-controlai-endorses",
        "source": "controlai",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
        "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "listed endorsement",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-declaration"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-miotti-endorses",
      "source": "miotti",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
      "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed endorsement",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-declaration"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-miotti-endorses",
        "source": "miotti",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
        "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "listed endorsement",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-declaration"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-leahy-endorses",
      "source": "leahy",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
      "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed endorsement",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-declaration"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-leahy-endorses",
        "source": "leahy",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
        "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "listed endorsement",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-declaration"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-winga-endorses",
      "source": "winga",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
      "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed endorsement",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-declaration"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-winga-endorses",
        "source": "winga",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Listed as declaration endorser",
        "summary": "Current declaration page lists this endorser; signature date unspecified.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "listed endorsement",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-declaration"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-scheduled",
      "source": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Advertises September 15 convening",
      "summary": "Public listing schedules the assembly in Washington.",
      "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "planned event",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-assembly"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-scheduled",
        "source": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Advertises September 15 convening",
        "summary": "Public listing schedules the assembly in Washington.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "planned event",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-assembly"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-builds-on",
      "source": "w42-assembly",
      "target": "w42-declaration",
      "label": "Builds on declaration",
      "summary": "The event listing explicitly connects the assembly to the earlier declaration.",
      "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "planned event",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-assembly"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-builds-on",
        "source": "w42-assembly",
        "target": "w42-declaration",
        "label": "Builds on declaration",
        "summary": "The event listing explicitly connects the assembly to the earlier declaration.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "planned event",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-assembly"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-organizer",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Presents September 15 assembly",
      "summary": "FLI publishes the assembly programme, event recap and official recap video.",
      "limit": "Edited recap and public programme; full proceedings not reviewed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "occurred",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s07",
        "w42-s-agenda",
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s10"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-organizer",
        "source": "fli",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Reported organizer",
        "summary": "Axios identifies FLI as organizer.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "planned event",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-axios"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-coxon-assembly",
      "source": "jacob-coxon",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Reported withdrawal from planned appearance",
      "summary": "Axios updated its account: Coxon and the organizers said he would not attend.",
      "limit": "The organizer homepage still lists him, while its inspected agenda does not. Attendance is not observed; no reason for withdrawal is established. Original morning account preserved in _raw.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "withdrawn",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-axios-update",
        "w42-s-assembly-home",
        "w42-s-agenda"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-coxon-assembly",
        "source": "jacob-coxon",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Reported planned participant",
        "summary": "Axios reports participation in the September 15 event.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "planned participation",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-axios"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-sanders-assembly",
      "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Addressed assembly",
      "summary": "Senate office reports Sanders addressed the gathering; CNN broadcasts a clip.",
      "limit": "Detailed policy positions are from prepared remarks; no assertion of a coalition-wide adopted platform.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "occurred",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s04",
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s05"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-sanders-assembly",
        "source": "w34-sanders-bernie",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Reported planned participant",
        "summary": "Axios reports participation in the September 15 event.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "planned participation",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-axios"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-bannon-assembly",
      "source": "w42-bannon",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Addressed assembly",
      "summary": "CNN event-day transcript includes Bannon clip and identifies his appearance.",
      "limit": "Appearance confirmed; detailed speech and collective decisions not established.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "occurred",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s05"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-bannon-assembly",
        "source": "w42-bannon",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Reported planned participant",
        "summary": "Axios reports participation in the September 15 event.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "planned participation",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-axios"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-blackburn-assembly",
      "source": "w30-class-blackburn",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Advertised speaker",
      "summary": "Named in the Alliance’s public event listing.",
      "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "planned participation",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-assembly"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-blackburn-assembly",
        "source": "w30-class-blackburn",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Advertised speaker",
        "summary": "Named in the Alliance’s public event listing.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "planned participation",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-assembly"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-bores-assembly",
      "source": "w3-opp-bores",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Advertised speaker",
      "summary": "Named in the Alliance’s public event listing.",
      "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "planned participation",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-assembly"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-bores-assembly",
        "source": "w3-opp-bores",
        "target": "w42-assembly",
        "label": "Advertised speaker",
        "summary": "Named in the Alliance’s public event listing.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "planned participation",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-15",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-assembly"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-google-announces",
      "source": "google",
      "target": "w42-google-canada",
      "label": "Announces Canadian rollout",
      "summary": "Google announces gradual rollout beginning in coming days.",
      "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announcement of planned rollout",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-google-ca"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-google-announces",
        "source": "google",
        "target": "w42-google-canada",
        "label": "Announces Canadian rollout",
        "summary": "Google announces gradual rollout beginning in coming days.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announcement of planned rollout",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-google-ca"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-e-google-method",
      "source": "w42-google-canada",
      "target": "ed2-age-assurance",
      "label": "Uses account-based age estimation",
      "summary": "Existing account signals classify users for age-based protections.",
      "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "planned implementation",
      "eventDate": null,
      "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
      "sources": [
        "w42-s-google-ca"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-e-google-method",
        "source": "w42-google-canada",
        "target": "ed2-age-assurance",
        "label": "Uses account-based age estimation",
        "summary": "Existing account signals classify users for age-based protections.",
        "limit": "Advertised or reported plan; attendance and outcomes not yet observed.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "planned implementation",
        "eventDate": null,
        "recordedDate": "Checked 14 September 2026; signature date unresolved",
        "sources": [
          "w42-s-google-ca"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-au-e-information",
      "source": "w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "Expands compulsory information and document access",
      "summary": "Amended section 63G permits written demands to persons holding relevant compliance information, extending beyond platform operators.",
      "limit": "The provision has a reasonable-grounds relevance test. This records legal authority, not an observed demand to a named vendor.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "in force",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Newly checked 14 September 2026; assent 11 September, commencement 12 September.",
      "sources": [
        "w43-au-s-act"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-au-e-information",
        "source": "w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "Expands compulsory information and document access",
        "summary": "Amended section 63G permits written demands to persons holding relevant compliance information, extending beyond platform operators.",
        "limit": "The provision has a reasonable-grounds relevance test. This records legal authority, not an observed demand to a named vendor.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "in force",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Newly checked 14 September 2026; assent 11 September, commencement 12 September.",
        "sources": [
          "w43-au-s-act"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-au-e-examination",
      "source": "w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
      "target": "esafety",
      "label": "Grants examination powers with safeguards",
      "summary": "New Division 4A permits summons, questions and documents in private examinations, with an adviser and defined witness and source protections.",
      "limit": "Sections 63HA–63HG govern scope and protections. No particular summons, prosecution or enforcement outcome was verified.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "in force",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
      "recordedDate": "Newly checked 14 September 2026; assent 11 September, commencement 12 September.",
      "sources": [
        "w43-au-s-act"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-au-e-examination",
        "source": "w43-au-enforcement-act2026",
        "target": "esafety",
        "label": "Grants examination powers with safeguards",
        "summary": "New Division 4A permits summons, questions and documents in private examinations, with an adviser and defined witness and source protections.",
        "limit": "Sections 63HA–63HG govern scope and protections. No particular summons, prosecution or enforcement outcome was verified.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "in force",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-12",
        "recordedDate": "Newly checked 14 September 2026; assent 11 September, commencement 12 September.",
        "sources": [
          "w43-au-s-act"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-e-treasury",
      "source": "w43-fin-clarity",
      "target": "w43-fin-treasury-role",
      "label": "Would confer conditional rulemaking power",
      "summary": "Section 10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury finding within 18 months of enactment of substantial detrimental deposit transfers from banks with assets below $10 billion, specifically tied to regulated activities; rules follow notice/comment and OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve consultation.",
      "limit": "Proposed authority only; 18 months bounds the determination window, not a proven expiry date for resulting rules.",
      "family": "regulation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "draft provision",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC",
      "sources": [
        "w43-fin-s-bill",
        "w43-fin-s-changes"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-e-treasury",
        "source": "w43-fin-clarity",
        "target": "w43-fin-treasury-role",
        "label": "Would confer conditional rulemaking power",
        "summary": "Section10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury finding within18months of enactment of substantial detrimental deposit transfers from banks with assets below$10billion, specifically tied to regulated activities; rules follow notice/comment and OCC,FDIC,Fed consultation.",
        "limit": "Proposed authority only;18months bounds the determination window, not a proven expiry date for resulting rules.",
        "family": "regulation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "draft provision",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
        "recordedDate": "Observed in noon pass14September2026; scan cutoff17:00:54UTC",
        "sources": [
          "w43-fin-s-bill",
          "w43-fin-s-changes"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-e-state",
      "source": "w43-fin-clarity",
      "target": "w43-fin-state-ethics-route",
      "label": "Would create constrained state action",
      "summary": "Proposed 5 USC 13153(d) separates state actions against the US Attorney General over covered-official violations from direct actions against intermediaries over prohibited listing.",
      "limit": "Certain ethics-office opinions/notices bar the first route; no enacted power or successful lawsuit is established.",
      "family": "regulation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "draft provision",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC",
      "sources": [
        "w43-fin-s-bill"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-e-state",
        "source": "w43-fin-clarity",
        "target": "w43-fin-state-ethics-route",
        "label": "Would create constrained state action",
        "summary": "Proposed5USC13153(d) separates state actions against the US Attorney General over covered-official violations from direct actions against intermediaries over prohibited listing.",
        "limit": "Certain ethics-office opinions/notices bar the first route; no enacted power or successful lawsuit is established.",
        "family": "regulation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "draft provision",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
        "recordedDate": "Observed in noon pass14September2026; scan cutoff17:00:54UTC",
        "sources": [
          "w43-fin-s-bill"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-e-paypal",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
      "label": "Sets US dispute terms effective September 14",
      "summary": "The June 29 notice identifies September 14 commencement; the linked dated agreement uses JAMS and staged mass arbitration, while claiming to supersede prior arbitration agreements for earlier disputes.",
      "limit": "US accounts only. Judicial enforceability and realized delays or recovery outcomes are not established; no new content-removal order is implied.",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract effective date",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC",
      "sources": [
        "w43-fin-s-paypal-notice",
        "w43-fin-s-paypal-agreement"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-e-paypal",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
        "label": "Sets US dispute terms effective September14",
        "summary": "The June29 notice identifies September14 commencement; the linked dated agreement uses JAMS and staged mass arbitration, while claiming to supersede prior arbitration agreements for earlier disputes.",
        "limit": "U.S.accounts only. Judicial enforceability and realized delays or recovery outcomes are not established; no new content-removal order is implied.",
        "family": "infrastructure",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "contract effective date",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
        "recordedDate": "Observed in noon pass14September2026; scan cutoff17:00:54UTC",
        "sources": [
          "w43-fin-s-paypal-notice",
          "w43-fin-s-paypal-agreement"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-e-adopted",
      "source": "w43-ai-jchr",
      "target": "w43-ai-report",
      "label": "Adopts committee report",
      "summary": "Formal minutes record the committee's adoption.",
      "limit": "Not passage of a bill.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recommendation",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "sources": [
        "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-e-adopted",
        "source": "w43-ai-jchr",
        "target": "w43-ai-report",
        "label": "Adopts committee report",
        "summary": "Formal minutes record the committee's adoption.",
        "limit": "Not passage of a bill.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "recommendation",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "sources": [
          "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-e-published",
      "source": "w43-ai-jchr",
      "target": "w43-ai-report",
      "label": "Publishes recommendations",
      "summary": "Publication date on the report's cover.",
      "limit": "Publication time within the day is unknown.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "publication",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "sources": [
        "w43-ai-s-jchr-report",
        "w43-ai-s-jchr-release"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-e-published",
        "source": "w43-ai-jchr",
        "target": "w43-ai-report",
        "label": "Publishes recommendations",
        "summary": "Publication date on the report's cover.",
        "limit": "Publication time within the day is unknown.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "publication",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "sources": [
          "w43-ai-s-jchr-report",
          "w43-ai-s-jchr-release"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-e-oversight",
      "source": "w43-ai-report",
      "target": "w43-ai-oversight-proposal",
      "label": "Recommends statutory enforcement powers",
      "summary": "Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established.",
      "limit": "Recommendations 226–227 and 233; the oversight body would decide, with AISI advice. An existing body could be expanded. No such power is enacted by this report.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "sources": [
        "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-e-oversight",
        "source": "w43-ai-report",
        "target": "w43-ai-oversight-proposal",
        "label": "Recommends statutory enforcement powers",
        "summary": "Proposed powers include testing, blocking launches, withdrawal, sanctions and remedies.",
        "limit": "Recommendations 226–227; an existing body could be expanded.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "sources": [
          "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-e-aisi",
      "source": "w43-ai-report",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Recommends compulsory model access",
      "summary": "AISI would review powerful models and receive specifications under statute.",
      "limit": "Recommendations 231–233; AISI would advise the oversight decision-maker. Functions might be combined. This is proposed, not current compulsory authority.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "sources": [
        "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-e-aisi",
        "source": "w43-ai-report",
        "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
        "label": "Recommends compulsory model access",
        "summary": "AISI would review powerful models and receive specifications under statute.",
        "limit": "Recommendations 231–233; AISI and oversight functions might be combined.",
        "family": "authority",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "proposed",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09",
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "sources": [
          "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-e-appointment",
      "source": "w44-net-svangel",
      "target": "w44-net-carney",
      "label": "Announces partner and policy leadership appointment",
      "summary": "SV Angel names Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
      "limit": "Firm announcement. No compensation, voting rights or exercised government influence disclosed.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w44-net-s-carney"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-e-appointment",
        "source": "w44-net-svangel",
        "target": "w44-net-carney",
        "label": "Announces partner and policy leadership appointment",
        "summary": "SV Angel names Carney as General Partner and Head of Public Policy and Communications.",
        "limit": "Firm announcement. No compensation, voting rights or exercised government influence disclosed.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "sources": [
          "w44-net-s-carney"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-e-initiative",
      "source": "w44-net-svangel",
      "target": "w44-net-blueprint",
      "label": "Launches internal AI policy initiative",
      "summary": "The firm presents Project Blueprint as an organized route connecting founders with policymakers.",
      "limit": "Publication day is established, hour unknown. No external legal authority or achieved outcome established.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w44-net-s-carney",
        "w44-net-s-blueprint",
        "w44-net-s-news"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-e-initiative",
        "source": "w44-net-svangel",
        "target": "w44-net-blueprint",
        "label": "Launches internal AI policy initiative",
        "summary": "The firm presents Project Blueprint as an organized route connecting founders with policymakers.",
        "limit": "Publication day is established, hour unknown. No external legal authority or achieved outcome established.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "sources": [
          "w44-net-s-carney",
          "w44-net-s-blueprint",
          "w44-net-s-news"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-e-leads",
      "source": "w44-net-carney",
      "target": "w44-net-blueprint",
      "label": "Assigned to lead policy engagement",
      "summary": "Carney’s stated work includes connecting portfolio founders and lawmakers through the initiative.",
      "limit": "Declared mandate, not an observed meeting, successful lobbying result or control over public decisions.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w44-net-s-carney",
        "w44-net-s-blueprint"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-e-leads",
        "source": "w44-net-carney",
        "target": "w44-net-blueprint",
        "label": "Assigned to lead policy engagement",
        "summary": "Carney’s stated work includes connecting portfolio founders and lawmakers through the initiative.",
        "limit": "Declared mandate, not an observed meeting, successful lobbying result or control over public decisions.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced",
        "sources": [
          "w44-net-s-carney",
          "w44-net-s-blueprint"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-e-ain-partner",
      "source": "a16z",
      "target": "w44-net-ain",
      "label": "Named as a launch partner",
      "summary": "AIN’s original launch identifies Andreessen Horowitz among its partners.",
      "limit": "Historical partnership newly inspected September 14; exact original publication date unresolved. No funding amount or control rights disclosed.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced partnership",
      "sources": [
        "w44-net-s-ain"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-e-ain-partner",
        "source": "a16z",
        "target": "w44-net-ain",
        "label": "Named as a launch partner",
        "summary": "AIN’s original launch identifies Andreessen Horowitz among its partners.",
        "limit": "Historical partnership newly inspected September 14; exact original publication date unresolved. No funding amount or control rights disclosed.",
        "family": "affiliation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "announced partnership",
        "sources": [
          "w44-net-s-ain"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-e-fry-leads",
      "source": "w44-net-fry",
      "target": "w44-net-caucus",
      "label": "Reported caucus leader",
      "summary": "Axios and Punchbowl name Fry as a leader alongside Subramanyam.",
      "limit": "Underlying release and caucus rules not acquired. Leadership of a caucus does not bind Congress.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w44-net-s-caucus",
        "w44-net-s-punchbowl"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-e-fry-leads",
        "source": "w44-net-fry",
        "target": "w44-net-caucus",
        "label": "Reported caucus leader",
        "summary": "Axios and Punchbowl name Fry as a leader alongside Subramanyam.",
        "limit": "Underlying release and caucus rules not acquired. Leadership of a caucus does not bind Congress.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "announced",
        "sources": [
          "w44-net-s-caucus",
          "w44-net-s-punchbowl"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-e-sub-leads",
      "source": "w44-net-subramanyam",
      "target": "w44-net-caucus",
      "label": "Reported caucus leader",
      "summary": "Axios and Punchbowl name Subramanyam as a leader alongside Fry.",
      "limit": "No caucus-authored law or AIN control relationship established by the reports.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w44-net-s-caucus",
        "w44-net-s-punchbowl"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-e-sub-leads",
        "source": "w44-net-subramanyam",
        "target": "w44-net-caucus",
        "label": "Reported caucus leader",
        "summary": "Axios and Punchbowl name Subramanyam as a leader alongside Fry.",
        "limit": "No caucus-authored law or AIN control relationship established by the reports.",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "announced",
        "sources": [
          "w44-net-s-caucus",
          "w44-net-s-punchbowl"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-14",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-rpib-pdc",
      "source": "w44-fin-rpib",
      "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
      "label": "Design and delivery oversight",
      "summary": "The July 2025 model assigns design and oversight to RPIB and procurement/funding to the industry-owned Delivery Company.",
      "limit": "Historical allocation of roles, newly examined as ancestry; not a September 14 award or proof of final shareholder rights.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "Institutional model announced",
      "eventDate": "2025-07-15",
      "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-boe-model"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-rpib-pdc",
        "source": "w44-fin-rpib",
        "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
        "label": "Design and delivery oversight",
        "summary": "The July 2025 model assigns design and oversight to RPIB and procurement/funding to the industry-owned Delivery Company.",
        "limit": "Historical allocation of roles, newly examined as ancestry; not a September 14 award or proof of final shareholder rights.",
        "family": "regulation",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "Institutional model announced",
        "eventDate": "2025-07-15",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-boe-model"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-paypal-pdc",
      "source": "paypal",
      "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
      "label": "Reported early participation",
      "summary": "Sky names PayPal among firms involved in early PDC work.",
      "limit": "Report dated September 14; participation itself predates publication. No institution-specific contribution amount, equity allocation or voting right established. Original timing note: Before or by 2026-09-14; exact date unresolved.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "Early formation participation reported",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-paypal-pdc",
        "source": "paypal",
        "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
        "label": "Reported early participation",
        "summary": "Sky names PayPal among firms involved in early PDC work.",
        "limit": "Report dated September 14; participation itself predates publication. No institution-specific contribution amount, equity allocation or voting right established.",
        "family": "membership",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "Early formation participation reported",
        "eventDate": "Before or by 2026-09-14; exact date unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-visa-pdc",
      "source": "visa",
      "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
      "label": "Reported early participation",
      "summary": "Sky names Visa among firms involved in early PDC work.",
      "limit": "Report dated September 14; participation itself predates publication. No institution-specific contribution amount, equity allocation or voting right established. Original timing note: Before or by 2026-09-14; exact date unresolved.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "Early formation participation reported",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-visa-pdc",
        "source": "visa",
        "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
        "label": "Reported early participation",
        "summary": "Sky names Visa among firms involved in early PDC work.",
        "limit": "Report dated September 14; participation itself predates publication. No institution-specific contribution amount, equity allocation or voting right established.",
        "family": "membership",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "Early formation participation reported",
        "eventDate": "Before or by 2026-09-14; exact date unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-mastercard-pdc",
      "source": "mastercard",
      "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
      "label": "Reported early participation",
      "summary": "Sky names Mastercard among firms involved in early PDC work.",
      "limit": "Report dated September 14; participation itself predates publication. No institution-specific contribution amount, equity allocation or voting right established. Original timing note: Before or by 2026-09-14; exact date unresolved.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "Early formation participation reported",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-mastercard-pdc",
        "source": "mastercard",
        "target": "w44-fin-pdc",
        "label": "Reported early participation",
        "summary": "Sky names Mastercard among firms involved in early PDC work.",
        "limit": "Report dated September 14; participation itself predates publication. No institution-specific contribution amount, equity allocation or voting right established.",
        "family": "membership",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "reported",
        "stage": "Early formation participation reported",
        "eventDate": "Before or by 2026-09-14; exact date unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-technet-saca",
      "source": "w44-fin-technet",
      "target": "w44-fin-saca",
      "label": "Leads the coalition",
      "summary": "TechNet names Mike Ward as SACA's leader; the linked public site identifies TechNet as payer.",
      "limit": "Institutional leadership and site sponsorship, not a measured lobbying budget or policy outcome. September 14 indicated by index; no launch hour. Original timing note: 2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "Coalition launch announced",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-technet",
        "w44-fin-s-saca",
        "w44-fin-s-technet-date-index"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-technet-saca",
        "source": "w44-fin-technet",
        "target": "w44-fin-saca",
        "label": "Leads the coalition",
        "summary": "TechNet names Mike Ward as SACA's leader; the linked public site identifies TechNet as payer.",
        "limit": "Institutional leadership and site sponsorship, not a measured lobbying budget or policy outcome. September 14 indicated by index; no launch hour.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "Coalition launch announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-technet",
          "w44-fin-s-saca",
          "w44-fin-s-technet-date-index"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-amazon-saca",
      "source": "w44-fin-amazon",
      "target": "w44-fin-saca",
      "label": "Founding member",
      "summary": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Amazon as a SACA founding member.",
      "limit": "Membership is documented by the organizer, not independent proof of policy influence, funding allocation or every member's agreement on every issue. Original timing note: 2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "Coalition founding membership announced",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-technet",
        "w44-fin-s-saca"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-amazon-saca",
        "source": "w44-fin-amazon",
        "target": "w44-fin-saca",
        "label": "Founding member",
        "summary": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Amazon as a SACA founding member.",
        "limit": "Membership is documented by the organizer, not independent proof of policy influence, funding allocation or every member's agreement on every issue.",
        "family": "membership",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "Coalition founding membership announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-technet",
          "w44-fin-s-saca"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-netflix-saca",
      "source": "w44-fin-netflix",
      "target": "w44-fin-saca",
      "label": "Founding member",
      "summary": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Netflix as a SACA founding member.",
      "limit": "Membership is documented by the organizer, not independent proof of policy influence, funding allocation or every member's agreement on every issue. Original timing note: 2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "Coalition founding membership announced",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-technet",
        "w44-fin-s-saca"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-netflix-saca",
        "source": "w44-fin-netflix",
        "target": "w44-fin-saca",
        "label": "Founding member",
        "summary": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies Netflix as a SACA founding member.",
        "limit": "Membership is documented by the organizer, not independent proof of policy influence, funding allocation or every member's agreement on every issue.",
        "family": "membership",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "Coalition founding membership announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-technet",
          "w44-fin-s-saca"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-e-ed2-youtube-saca",
      "source": "ed2-youtube",
      "target": "w44-fin-saca",
      "label": "Founding member",
      "summary": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies YouTube as a SACA founding member.",
      "limit": "Membership is documented by the organizer, not independent proof of policy influence, funding allocation or every member's agreement on every issue. Original timing note: 2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "Coalition founding membership announced",
      "recordedDate": "Observed 2026-09-14; original event time not independently resolved.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-fin-s-technet",
        "w44-fin-s-saca"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-e-ed2-youtube-saca",
        "source": "ed2-youtube",
        "target": "w44-fin-saca",
        "label": "Founding member",
        "summary": "TechNet's launch announcement identifies YouTube as a SACA founding member.",
        "limit": "Membership is documented by the organizer, not independent proof of policy influence, funding allocation or every member's agreement on every issue.",
        "family": "membership",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "Coalition founding membership announced",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14; calendar date index-supported, intraday time unresolved",
        "recordedDate": "Read in September 14 evening pass; cutoff 23:00:27.302Z",
        "sources": [
          "w44-fin-s-technet",
          "w44-fin-s-saca"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes",
      "source": "microsoft",
      "target": "w44-ai-mai-code",
      "label": "Publishes MAI consultation draft",
      "summary": "Microsoft AI issued the draft and opened six weeks of public feedback.",
      "limit": "Published at 13:00Z before the noon baseline; evening catch-up. No current model compliance established. The code page's 17:44:20Z modification metadata does not prove substantive revision.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "public draft issued",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
      "recordedDate": "Evening catch-up 14 September 2026; original publication 13:00Z; captured after 23:00:27Z cutoff.",
      "sources": [
        "w44-ai-s-ms-announcement",
        "w44-ai-s-mai-code"
      ],
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-ai-e-ms-publishes",
        "source": "microsoft",
        "target": "w44-ai-mai-code",
        "label": "Publishes MAI consultation draft",
        "summary": "Microsoft AI issued the draft and opened six weeks of public feedback.",
        "limit": "Published at 13:00Z before the noon baseline; evening catch-up. No current model compliance established. The code page's 17:44:20Z modification metadata does not prove substantive revision.",
        "family": "advocacy",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "public draft issued",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-14",
        "recordedDate": "Evening catch-up 14 September 2026; original publication 13:00Z; captured after 23:00:27Z cutoff.",
        "sources": [
          "w44-ai-s-ms-announcement",
          "w44-ai-s-mai-code"
        ],
        "eventTime": "2026-09-14T13:00:00Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-e-siblings",
      "source": "w45-dario-amodei",
      "target": "w45-daniela-amodei",
      "label": "Siblings and Anthropic co-founders",
      "summary": "Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and co-founders of Anthropic.",
      "limit": "Public family and professional relationship; no METR governance power follows from kinship.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": false,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w45-s-amodei",
        "w45-s-leadership"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-e-marriage",
      "source": "w45-daniela-amodei",
      "target": "w45-holden-karnofsky",
      "label": "Spouses",
      "summary": "Karnofsky identifies Daniela Amodei as his wife in a published interview transcript.",
      "limit": "Marriage is documented; it is not evidence of a grant, editorial instruction or METR appointment.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": false,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w45-s-wife"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-e-former-ceo",
      "source": "w45-holden-karnofsky",
      "target": "coefficient",
      "label": "Former CEO of Open Philanthropy",
      "summary": "The organization now named Coefficient Giving identifies Karnofsky as its former CEO, who stepped down in 2023.",
      "limit": "Former role, not current grantmaking authority; no direct METR donation is identified by this record.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical",
      "sources": [
        "w45-s-coefficient"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-e-anthropic-report",
      "source": "w45-holden-karnofsky",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Coauthored Anthropic pilot risk report",
      "summary": "Anthropic credits Karnofsky as a main-report author in October 2025.",
      "limit": "This proves a published work role; it does not establish METR influence.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published",
      "sources": [
        "w45-s-anthropic-report"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-16",
      "eventDate": "2025-10-28"
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-e-review-veto",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Held pilot review-publication veto",
      "summary": "METR says Anthropic had a general veto over publication of its February 2026 risk-report review under their pilot NDA.",
      "limit": "METR says no redactions happened; publication itself shows the veto was not used to suppress this review. It intends to narrow future review to sensitive-information redactions.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "pilot",
      "sources": [
        "w45-s-metr-review"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-commons-operator",
      "source": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Operates grant-allocation platform",
      "summary": "Lightcone Infrastructure operates Lightcone Commons.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-habryka-lightcone",
      "source": "w46-habryka",
      "target": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "label": "CEO",
      "summary": "Commons identifies Habryka as Lightcone Infrastructure CEO.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-habryka-commons",
      "source": "w46-habryka",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Founder, evaluator and evaluator admission",
      "summary": "Habryka can admit evaluators; funders expecting at least $50,000 per round may also bring them.",
      "limit": "Admission is distinct from donors’ final grant decisions.",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons",
        "w46-s-ltff-close"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-e-habryka-commons",
        "source": "w46-habryka",
        "target": "w46-commons",
        "label": "Founder and confirmed evaluator",
        "summary": "Habryka created the platform and participates as an evaluator.",
        "limit": "",
        "family": "people",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "current",
        "sources": [
          "w46-s-commons",
          "w46-s-ltff-close"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-parikh-commons",
      "source": "w46-parikh",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
      "summary": "Listed among the confirmed evaluators for the first round.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons",
      "source": "yudkowsky",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
      "summary": "The Commons participant list identifies Yudkowsky as a confirmed evaluator, alongside his MIRI background.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-soares-commons",
      "source": "nate-soares",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Confirmed grant evaluator",
      "summary": "The Commons participant list identifies Soares as a confirmed evaluator.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-tallinn-commons",
      "source": "tallinn",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Tentative $10m; matching condition",
      "summary": "The first-round list anticipates $10 million from Tallinn if other funders contribute $10 million.",
      "limit": "Conditional intended participation, not a disbursement or irrevocable pledge.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-moskovitz-commons",
      "source": "moskovitz",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Tentative ~$5m first round",
      "summary": "Commons lists approximately $5 million from Moskovitz for the first round and $10 million over the first year if it goes well.",
      "limit": "The year figure includes the first round; do not add them. Funding remains tentative.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-arm-commons",
      "source": "w46-arm",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Tentative ~$2m participation",
      "summary": "Commons names the ARM Fund as a tentative first-round funder.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-parikh-arm",
      "source": "w46-parikh",
      "target": "w46-arm",
      "label": "Managing director",
      "summary": "The Commons evaluator biography identifies this role.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-commons"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-parikh-ltff",
      "source": "w46-parikh",
      "target": "w1-creator-ltff",
      "label": "Outgoing fund manager",
      "summary": "Parikh announces the managers' departure and closure of the LTFF.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-ltff-close"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-11"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-habryka-ltff",
      "source": "w46-habryka",
      "target": "w1-creator-ltff",
      "label": "Outgoing fund manager",
      "summary": "The closure announcement names Habryka as a fund manager and Commons founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-ltff-close"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-ltff-commons",
      "source": "w1-creator-ltff",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Planned spend-down channel; fees waived",
      "summary": "LTFF plans to distribute up to three quarters of its remaining balance, approximately $2.8 million, to existing applications and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons. LTFF managers retain final allocation decisions.",
      "limit": "The $2.8m is the overall allocation bucket, not an observed Commons payment. Normal platform and evaluator fees are waived for the LTFF contribution.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-ltff-close"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-11"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-ltff-taif",
      "source": "w1-creator-ltff",
      "target": "w46-taif",
      "label": "Announced ~$0.9m seed allocation",
      "summary": "LTFF announces approximately one quarter of its remaining balance as a seed grant for the new fund.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-ltff-close"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-11"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-eafunds-taif",
      "source": "w46-eafunds",
      "target": "w46-taif",
      "label": "Launches new AI fund",
      "summary": "EA Funds announces a new AI seed fund with a new full-time team.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-taif-launch",
        "w46-s-taif"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-11"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-cea-taif",
      "source": "w46-cea",
      "target": "w46-taif",
      "label": "Institutional home",
      "summary": "The outgoing LTFF manager identifies the new programme as CEA-housed.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-ltff-close"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-lundin-taif",
      "source": "w46-lundin",
      "target": "w46-taif",
      "label": "Head of fund",
      "summary": "The fund page names Lundin as head.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-taif"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-parikh-taif",
      "source": "w46-parikh",
      "target": "w46-taif",
      "label": "Fund adviser",
      "summary": "The fund page lists Parikh as an adviser.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-taif"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-evusa-cea",
      "source": "w46-evusa",
      "target": "w46-cea",
      "label": "Fiscal sponsor",
      "summary": "CEA's press kit identifies EV USA as its fiscal sponsor.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cea"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-robinson-cea",
      "source": "w46-robinson",
      "target": "w46-cea",
      "label": "CEO since February 2024",
      "summary": "CEA records Robinson's appointment.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cea"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-robinson-evusa",
      "source": "w46-robinson",
      "target": "w46-evusa",
      "label": "CEO",
      "summary": "CEA identifies Robinson as CEO of its fiscal sponsor too.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cea"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-robinson-coefficient",
      "source": "w46-robinson",
      "target": "coefficient",
      "label": "Former chief of staff at Open Philanthropy",
      "summary": "His prior responsibilities included communications, grantmaking teams and organization-wide policies.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cea"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-80k",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-80k",
      "label": "Largest donor, disclosed by recipient",
      "summary": "The September 17 podcast identifies Coefficient Giving as 80,000 Hours' largest donor; the host says Max Nadeau's team has not directly funded it.",
      "limit": "No amount or editorial approval right is disclosed here.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-80k-tailwind"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-tailwind",
      "label": "Launches nonprofit-founder initiative",
      "summary": "Coefficient launches Project Tailwind to find and finance founders of ambitious AI-safety initiatives.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cg-scale"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-80k-tailwind",
      "source": "w46-80k",
      "target": "w46-tailwind",
      "label": "Promotes founder funding in podcast",
      "summary": "The September 17 episode presents Coefficient's funding opportunities to prospective founders and discusses Tailwind.",
      "limit": "Published September 17; recorded August 18. Donor relationship is explicitly disclosed.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-80k-tailwind"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-80k-nadeau",
      "source": "w46-80k",
      "target": "w46-nadeau",
      "label": "Interviews grantmaker on new nonprofits",
      "summary": "80,000 Hours publishes its interview with Nadeau on recruiting founders and funding ambitious AI-safety organizations.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-80k-tailwind"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient",
      "source": "w46-nadeau",
      "target": "coefficient",
      "label": "Technical AI-safety grantmaker",
      "summary": "The interview identifies his role and funding work.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-80k-tailwind"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-oehlsen-coefficient",
      "source": "w46-oehlsen",
      "target": "coefficient",
      "label": "Leads AI and biosecurity grantmaking",
      "summary": "Oehlsen dates her move to the Global Catastrophic Risks side to March 2025.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cg-scale"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-resolution",
      "label": "$108m base + $52m conditional",
      "summary": "Resolution describes a $160m award with a conditional component tied to hiring and compute needs; the base includes regranting.",
      "limit": "July 7 is the recipient announcement date. Payment schedule and detailed milestones are not public.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient-reported grant",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cg-scale",
        "w48-cap-s-resolution-funding"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-07-07",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
        "source": "coefficient",
        "target": "w46-resolution",
        "label": "$160m grant approved",
        "summary": "Coefficient reports approval of its largest AI-safety grant for Geoffrey Irving's new research organization.",
        "limit": "Date of public statement; payment timing and detailed conditions not established.",
        "family": "funding",
        "directed": true,
        "status": "documented",
        "stage": "approved",
        "sources": [
          "w46-s-cg-scale"
        ],
        "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
        "eventDate": "2026-09-09"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-redwood",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-redwood",
      "label": "Over $70m recommended / two years",
      "summary": "Coefficient reports a recommendation supporting Redwood's expansion.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recommended",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cg-scale"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-epoch",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-epoch",
      "label": "$68m recommended / three years",
      "summary": "Coefficient reports a renewal recommendation supporting Epoch's capacity, benchmarks, data and economics work.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recommended",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-cg-scale"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-egc",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-egc",
      "label": "Runs giving and careers programme",
      "summary": "Programme update describes expansion and new policy-talent grants.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-egc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-egc-need",
      "source": "w46-egc",
      "target": "w46-need",
      "label": "Names policy-talent support",
      "summary": "Coefficient's programme update lists NEED as a policy-talent grantee.",
      "limit": "Programme attribution for the grant separately disclosed by NEED; not an additional cash flow.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-egc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-coefficient-need",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-need",
      "label": "Recommends foundation grant",
      "summary": "NEED identifies Coefficient as recommending the grant it receives through SVCF.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-need"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-svcf-need",
      "source": "svcf",
      "target": "w46-need",
      "label": "Grant disclosed by recipient",
      "summary": "NEED identifies Silicon Valley Community Foundation as the grant source.",
      "limit": "Recipient disclosure; amount and award document not acquired.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-need"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-egc-ipc",
      "source": "w46-egc",
      "target": "w46-ipc",
      "label": "Funds policy-career accelerator",
      "summary": "Programme update names Impactful Policy Careers in its policy-talent support.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-egc",
        "w46-s-ipc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-egc-gprg",
      "source": "w46-egc",
      "target": "w46-gprg",
      "label": "Supports consultation-response coordination",
      "summary": "Coefficient names GPRG among its new policy-talent grants and describes this function.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-egc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-e-egc-renaissance",
      "source": "w46-egc",
      "target": "w46-renaissance",
      "label": "Supports PEN policy network",
      "summary": "Coefficient names Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network for support to policy entrepreneurs.",
      "limit": "Funder-reported programme relationship; grant terms and recipient outputs remain to be traced.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w46-s-egc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-gv-grant",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "$6.8m grant entry / two years",
      "summary": "Good Ventures lists a February 2024 Pattern Labs award.",
      "limit": "Same grant as the Open Philanthropy recommendation; not an equity investment or payment ledger.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed grant",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-grant"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-02"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-cg-recommendation",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Recommends the $6.8m grant",
      "summary": "Open Philanthropy recommendation named in the Good Ventures entry.",
      "limit": "One grant with a separate recommender and grant-record publisher; do not add these arrows together.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recommended",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-grant"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-sequoia-investment",
      "source": "w47-sequoia",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Venture backing",
      "summary": "Sequoia confirms its investment partnership.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced investment",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-sequoia"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-redpoint-investment",
      "source": "w47-redpoint",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Venture backing",
      "summary": "Redpoint named in the combined $80m raise.",
      "limit": "No separate investor amount established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced investment",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-launch"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-lahav-irregular",
      "source": "w47-lahav",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Co-founder / CEO",
      "summary": "Public founder and executive role.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-launch",
        "w47-s-ife"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-omer-irregular",
      "source": "w47-omer",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Co-founder / CTO",
      "summary": "Public founder and executive role.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-heron",
        "w47-s-launch"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-omer-israel",
      "source": "w47-omer",
      "target": "w47-ea-israel",
      "label": "Board member",
      "summary": "Name appears in the current board list.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-israel"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-omer-heron",
      "source": "w47-omer",
      "target": "w47-heron",
      "label": "Advisory board",
      "summary": "Heron names Nevo as an adviser.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-heron"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-israel-heron",
      "source": "w47-ea-israel",
      "target": "w47-heron",
      "label": "Hosts project",
      "summary": "Heron identifies EA Israel as its registered nonprofit host.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-heron"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-cg-heron",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w47-heron",
      "label": "Disclosed funder",
      "summary": "Heron identifies Coefficient Giving as its funder.",
      "limit": "Amount and award terms not disclosed on this page.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-heron"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-omer-pg",
      "source": "w47-omer",
      "target": "w47-pg",
      "label": "Co-founder / director",
      "summary": "Current director and former CEO.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-pg"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-sella-pg",
      "source": "w47-sella",
      "target": "w47-pg",
      "label": "Co-founder / director",
      "summary": "Current director and former research head.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-pg"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-lahav-ife",
      "source": "w47-lahav",
      "target": "w47-ife",
      "label": "Co-founder",
      "summary": "Co-founded the educational initiative.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-ife"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-sella-ife",
      "source": "w47-sella",
      "target": "w47-ife",
      "label": "Co-founder",
      "summary": "Co-founded the educational initiative.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-ife"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-sella-rand",
      "source": "w47-sella",
      "target": "w41-rand",
      "label": "Research leader",
      "summary": "Current director of RAND Center on AI, Security, and Technology.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-sella"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-eaif-mooc",
      "source": "ea-infrastructure-fund",
      "target": "w47-mooc",
      "label": "Lists joint $394,968 grant",
      "summary": "2022 Q3 ledger grant for an online course.",
      "limit": "Quarter precision; one joint grant, not one payment per recipient.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed grant",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-mooc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2022 Q3"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-mooc-lahav",
      "source": "w47-mooc",
      "target": "w47-lahav",
      "label": "Named joint grantee",
      "summary": "Joint recipient in the ledger.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed recipient",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-mooc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-mooc-sella",
      "source": "w47-mooc",
      "target": "w47-sella",
      "label": "Named joint grantee",
      "summary": "Joint recipient in the same ledger row.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed recipient",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-mooc"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-lahav-weights",
      "source": "w47-lahav",
      "target": "w47-weights",
      "label": "Co-author",
      "summary": "Named author of the RAND publication.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-weights"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-05-30"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-sella-weights",
      "source": "w47-sella",
      "target": "w47-weights",
      "label": "Co-author",
      "summary": "Named author of the RAND publication.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-weights"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-rand-weights",
      "source": "w41-rand",
      "target": "w47-weights",
      "label": "Publishes security framework",
      "summary": "RAND publishes model-weights security research.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-weights"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-irregular-openai",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "Cyber-evaluation supplier",
      "summary": "OpenAI identifies its testing relationship with Irregular.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-openai-third"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-irregular-anthropic",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Cyber-evaluation supplier",
      "summary": "Anthropic identifies Irregular as the evaluation partner involved in the July disclosure.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-anth-july"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-irregular-deepmind",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "deepmind",
      "label": "Lab security collaboration",
      "summary": "Investor and founder announcements name Google DeepMind as a partner.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-launch",
        "w47-s-sequoia"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-irregular-meta",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "meta",
      "label": "Testing supplier, reported",
      "summary": "AP reports Meta hired Irregular and quotes both organizations on a testing incident.",
      "limit": "Reported company statements; standalone Meta postmortem not acquired.",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-meta"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-irregular-guidance",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w47-guidance",
      "label": "Announces best-practice work",
      "summary": "Supplier proposes shared cyber-evaluation guidance after containment failures.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-irregular-response"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-14"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-openai-guidance",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w47-guidance",
      "label": "Will participate",
      "summary": "OpenAI says it will contribute to the white paper and continue the partnership.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-openai-third"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-04"
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-e-anthropic-metr",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Signs independent-review agreement",
      "summary": "Anthropic announces METR investigation of four incidents, with access beyond incident windows and to employees.",
      "limit": "Initial agreement is eight weeks with mutually agreed extension; not a completed independent verdict.",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w47-s-anth-sept"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-e-irregular",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w48-root-agenda",
      "label": "Research collaboration",
      "summary": "Research collaboration.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published research",
      "sources": [
        "w48-root-s-intro"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-24"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-e-rand",
      "source": "w41-rand",
      "target": "w48-root-agenda",
      "label": "Researchers co-author",
      "summary": "Researchers co-author.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published research",
      "sources": [
        "w48-root-s-intro"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-e-lahav",
      "source": "w47-lahav",
      "target": "w48-root-agenda",
      "label": "Co-author",
      "summary": "Co-author.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published research",
      "sources": [
        "w48-root-s-agenda"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-e-omer",
      "source": "w47-omer",
      "target": "w48-root-agenda",
      "label": "Co-author",
      "summary": "Co-author.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published research",
      "sources": [
        "w48-root-s-agenda"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-e-sella",
      "source": "w47-sella",
      "target": "w48-root-agenda",
      "label": "Co-author",
      "summary": "Co-author.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published research",
      "sources": [
        "w48-root-s-agenda"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-openai-resolution",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w46-resolution",
      "label": "$10m in API credits",
      "summary": "Resolution announced OpenAI-provided credits for research including autoformalization.",
      "limit": "Credit face value; cash payment and contract terms are not established.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "in-kind resources",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-resolution-openai"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-08-31"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-resolution-team",
      "source": "w46-resolution",
      "target": "w48-cap-agent-foundations",
      "label": "Hosts Agent Foundations team",
      "summary": "The group announced it was joining Resolution.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-resolution-team"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-02"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-irving-resolution",
      "source": "w48-cap-irving",
      "target": "w46-resolution",
      "label": "Co-founder and chief scientist",
      "summary": "Irving lists his current leadership role.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-irving-bio"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-irving-aisi",
      "source": "w48-cap-irving",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Former chief scientist",
      "summary": "Irving identifies his former UK AISI role.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical roles",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-irving-bio"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-irving-openai",
      "source": "w48-cap-irving",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "Former Reflection Team lead",
      "summary": "Irving lists earlier OpenAI team leadership.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical roles",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-irving-bio"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-irving-deepmind",
      "source": "w48-cap-irving",
      "target": "deepmind",
      "label": "Former Scalable Alignment Team lead",
      "summary": "Irving lists earlier DeepMind team leadership.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical roles",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-irving-bio"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-cg-epoch-tracker",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w46-epoch",
      "label": "$2.74m: data-center tracker",
      "summary": "Epoch reports Coefficient support for its Public Data Center Tracker.",
      "limit": "Separate project support, not the later $68m renewal recommendation.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-epoch-transparency"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-epoch-tracker",
      "source": "w46-epoch",
      "target": "w48-cap-data-centers",
      "label": "Builds and publishes explorer",
      "summary": "Epoch announced expanded global coverage.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "publication",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-epoch-output"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-epoch-eu",
      "source": "w46-epoch",
      "target": "w41-eu-ai-office",
      "label": "2026 technical consultations",
      "summary": "Epoch discloses this engagement.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-epoch-transparency"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-epoch-metr",
      "source": "w46-epoch",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "2025 software-engineering benchmark",
      "summary": "Epoch lists collaborative benchmark work.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-epoch-transparency"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-epoch-openai",
      "source": "w46-epoch",
      "target": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "label": "2026 FrontierMath audit and verifier",
      "summary": "Epoch lists both projects.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-epoch-transparency"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-epoch-deepmind",
      "source": "w46-epoch",
      "target": "deepmind",
      "label": "2026 co-mathematician evaluation",
      "summary": "Epoch discloses evaluation on FrontierMath.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recipient disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-epoch-transparency"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-redwood-deepmind",
      "source": "w46-redwood",
      "target": "deepmind",
      "label": "Advises on misalignment risk",
      "summary": "Redwood identifies DeepMind among its advisory relationships.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-redwood-work"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-redwood-anthropic",
      "source": "w46-redwood",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Advises on misalignment risk",
      "summary": "Redwood identifies Anthropic among its advisory relationships.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-redwood-work"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-redwood-aisi",
      "source": "w46-redwood",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Joint AI control safety-case work",
      "summary": "Redwood identifies UK AISI as partner on a published safety-case sketch.",
      "limit": "Regulatory adoption and payment terms are not established.",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-redwood-work"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-metr",
      "source": "moskovitz",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Publicly states support",
      "summary": "Moskovitz names METR among organizations they fund.",
      "limit": "Amount, vehicle and disbursement date unspecified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "donor_reported",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-moskovitz-support"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-11"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-redwood",
      "source": "moskovitz",
      "target": "w46-redwood",
      "label": "Publicly states support",
      "summary": "Moskovitz names Redwood among organizations they fund.",
      "limit": "Amount, vehicle and disbursement date unspecified.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "reported",
      "stage": "donor_reported",
      "sources": [
        "w48-cap-s-moskovitz-support"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-11"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-acquires",
      "source": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "target": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "label": "Filed control: at least 75% shares and votes",
      "summary": "Companies House lists Accenture plc with at least 75% of shares and voting rights, plus director appointment/removal rights, notified March 12.",
      "limit": "This filing establishes control of Faculty Science Limited; the September evaluation contract signatory is not disclosed.",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "filed control",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s12"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-openai-api-credits",
      "source": "w34-sanders-openai",
      "target": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "label": "Provided free API credits for incident review",
      "summary": "METR estimates approximately $400,000 of free OpenAI API credits consumed during its investigation.",
      "limit": "Analysis resources, not an assessment fee or cash grant; valuation is METR estimate.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "in-kind support used",
      "sources": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-s-008"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-warner-acc",
      "source": "w48-eval-warner",
      "target": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "label": "CTO and management committee",
      "summary": "Warner added Accenture leadership roles on acquisition completion.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s08"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-warner-faculty",
      "source": "w48-eval-warner",
      "target": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "label": "CEO",
      "summary": "Accenture identifies Warner as Faculty CEO.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s08"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-pays-evaluation",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "label": "Directly funds evaluator work",
      "summary": "Anthropic says it will directly fund Accenture embedded evaluation.",
      "limit": "Fee amount and payment ledger not disclosed; the five-year investment intentions are not this contract price.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced funding",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-18"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-acc-embedded",
      "source": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "target": "w48-eval-embedded",
      "label": "Builds embedded evaluator team",
      "summary": "Accenture participates in the announced assessment partnership.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-18"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-faculty-embedded",
      "source": "w16-supp-faculty",
      "target": "w48-eval-embedded",
      "label": "Leads evaluation work",
      "summary": "Faculty is identified as the lead specialist business.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-18"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-embedded-anthropic",
      "source": "w48-eval-embedded",
      "target": "anthropic",
      "label": "Internal evaluation access",
      "summary": "Evaluators are intended to receive access comparable to employees.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "planned access",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-18"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-acc-business",
      "source": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "target": "w48-eval-business-group",
      "label": "Forms joint Business Group",
      "summary": "Joint enterprise Claude deployment programme.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s09"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-12-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-anthropic-business",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w48-eval-business-group",
      "label": "Forms joint Business Group",
      "summary": "Joint enterprise Claude deployment programme.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s09"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-12-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-acc-cyber",
      "source": "w48-eval-accenture",
      "target": "w48-eval-cyber-ai",
      "label": "Develops and deploys product",
      "summary": "Accenture announces Cyber.AI and reports internal use.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced launch",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s10"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-25"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-claude-cyber",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w48-eval-cyber-ai",
      "label": "Claude powers product",
      "summary": "Claude is described as Cyber.AI central reasoning engine.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced integration",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s10"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-25"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-framework",
      "source": "anthropic",
      "target": "w48-eval-framework",
      "label": "Publishes proposed framework",
      "summary": "Proposes evaluator qualification, independence safeguards and regulatory review.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "policy proposal",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-eval-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-06"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-fli-cofounder",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Co-founds coalition",
      "summary": "FLI named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "launched",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-pl-cofounder",
      "source": "w48-eval-project-liberty",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Co-founds coalition",
      "summary": "Project Liberty named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "launched",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-ergo-cofounder",
      "source": "w48-eval-ergo",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Co-founds coalition",
      "summary": "Ergo Impact named as one of three organizational co-founders.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "launched",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-omidyar-steering",
      "source": "omidyar",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Steering committee",
      "summary": "Launch names Omidyar Network in steering structure.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced governance",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-mila-steering",
      "source": "w48-eval-mila",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Steering committee",
      "summary": "Launch names Mila in steering structure.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced governance",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-site-operator",
      "source": "w48-eval-project-liberty-institute",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Operates coalition website",
      "summary": "Privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as site operator.",
      "limit": "Website operation is not coalition ownership.",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s03"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-mccourt-pl",
      "source": "w48-eval-mccourt",
      "target": "w48-eval-project-liberty",
      "label": "Founder",
      "summary": "Launch identifies McCourt as Project Liberty founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-aguirre-coal",
      "source": "aguirre",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Co-founder",
      "summary": "FLI executive identified as coalition co-founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-mccourt-coal",
      "source": "w48-eval-mccourt",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Co-founder",
      "summary": "McCourt identified as coalition co-founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-tillemann-coal",
      "source": "w48-eval-tillemann",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "CEO",
      "summary": "Launch identifies Tillemann as coalition CEO.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-galinsky-coal",
      "source": "w48-eval-galinsky",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Executive director",
      "summary": "Website names Galinsky in executive leadership.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-henderson-ergo",
      "source": "w48-eval-henderson",
      "target": "w48-eval-ergo",
      "label": "Co-founder",
      "summary": "Website identifies Henderson as Ergo Impact co-founder.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-henderson-coal",
      "source": "w48-eval-henderson",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Co-founder",
      "summary": "Website places Henderson in coalition founding group.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-assembly-launch",
      "source": "w42-assembly",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Coalition launch announced same day",
      "summary": "Organizer programme schedules coalition announcements; dated issuer release establishes launch.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced launch",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01",
        "w42-s-agenda"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-member-controlai",
      "source": "controlai",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Listed coalition member",
      "summary": "Coalition website includes this organization in its member roster.",
      "limit": "Membership date, contribution and specific decision rights are not given.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed membership",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-member-cais",
      "source": "cais",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Listed coalition member",
      "summary": "Coalition website includes this organization in its member roster.",
      "limit": "Membership date, contribution and specific decision rights are not given.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed membership",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-member-w11-fund-minderoo",
      "source": "w11-fund-minderoo",
      "target": "w48-eval-coalition",
      "label": "Listed coalition member",
      "summary": "Coalition website includes this organization in its member roster.",
      "limit": "Membership date, contribution and specific decision rights are not given.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "listed membership",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-fli-toolkit",
      "source": "fli",
      "target": "w48-eval-toolkit",
      "label": "Publishes shared materials",
      "summary": "FLI event site provides graphics and captions for coordinated sharing.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "implementation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s06"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-toolkit-assembly",
      "source": "w48-eval-toolkit",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Promotes event",
      "summary": "Toolkit supports common event messaging through an embedded sharing application.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "published",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s06"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-e-casar-assembly",
      "source": "w34-sanders-casar",
      "target": "w42-assembly",
      "label": "Spoke and advocated international controls",
      "summary": "Casar interview on event day confirms appearance and calls for an enforceable international AI agreement.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "occurred",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eval-s-assembly-s05"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-lightcone-arm",
      "source": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "target": "w46-arm",
      "label": "Announced programme migration",
      "summary": "Habryka announced ARM had become a Lightcone programme.",
      "limit": "ARM About still names Effective Ventures; exact transfer date and instrument unresolved.",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-migration",
        "w48-com-s-arm"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-12-13"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-lightcone-fund",
      "source": "lightcone-infrastructure",
      "target": "w48-com-corrigibility",
      "label": "Legal grantmaker; final approval",
      "summary": "Lightcone retains final approval of the fund’s grants.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "authority",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-fund"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-harms-fund",
      "source": "w48-com-harms",
      "target": "w48-com-corrigibility",
      "label": "Fund manager",
      "summary": "Harms manages the fund and recommends awards.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "people",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "current",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-fund"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-fund-commons",
      "source": "w48-com-corrigibility",
      "target": "w46-commons",
      "label": "Future application platform",
      "summary": "Future fund applications use Commons.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "infrastructure",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-fund",
        "w48-com-s-awards"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-fund-kahn",
      "source": "w48-com-corrigibility",
      "target": "w48-com-kahn",
      "label": "$35,000 award",
      "summary": "Announced research award.",
      "limit": "Award announcement; cash settlement not observed.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-awards"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-03"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-fund-saudek",
      "source": "w48-com-corrigibility",
      "target": "w48-com-saudek",
      "label": "$3,000 award",
      "summary": "Announced research award.",
      "limit": "Award announcement; cash settlement not observed.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "announced",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-awards"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-03"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-e-80k-harms",
      "source": "w46-80k",
      "target": "w48-com-harms",
      "label": "Podcast led to applicant contacts",
      "summary": "Harms attributes two grantees’ initial approaches to his podcast appearance.",
      "limit": "Harms’ account; 80,000 Hours did not make these awards.",
      "family": "advocacy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "historical",
      "sources": [
        "w48-com-s-awards"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-e-commission-proposal",
      "source": "european-commission",
      "target": "w48-eu-kids-act",
      "label": "Proposes EU access rules",
      "summary": "Commission published its legislative proposal on September 17.",
      "limit": "Not enacted law.",
      "family": "regulation",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "proposed",
      "sources": [
        "w48-eu-s-landing"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-dsit-cyber-award",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w49-cyber-advisory-contract",
      "label": "Awards cyber evaluation and advice",
      "summary": "DSIT awards work to Pattern Labs; value later corrected to £293,151.",
      "limit": "Award record, not cash disbursement.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract awarded",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s01",
        "w49-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-02-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-cyber-contractor",
      "source": "w49-cyber-advisory-contract",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Names Pattern Labs as supplier",
      "summary": "The award identifies Pattern Labs Tech Inc., the legal name disclosed by Irregular.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s01",
        "w49-s-legal-name"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-02-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-dsit-safeguards-award",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w49-safeguards-contract",
      "label": "Awards £459,875 research contract",
      "summary": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards award starts 17 September 2024.",
      "limit": "Value of the awarded contract; extension option is not evidence of exercise.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract awarded",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s03",
        "w49-s04"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-safeguards-contractor",
      "source": "w49-safeguards-contract",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Hires research team; reserves reuse rights",
      "summary": "Order form names Pattern Labs Tech Inc. Special Term 1 retains supplier know-how and permits commercialization of related evaluation products.",
      "limit": "Permission to commercialize does not identify a later sale.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract terms",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s04"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-safeguards-tests",
      "source": "w49-safeguards-contract",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Supplies attacks for tests and threat models",
      "summary": "Schedule 20 commissions technical inputs for AISI evaluations and threat models, with weekly researcher collaboration.",
      "limit": "Specification and intended use; specific accepted outputs remain unavailable.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "commissioned research",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s04"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-publication-control",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w49-safeguards-contract",
      "label": "Keeps final publication decision",
      "summary": "Schedule 20 assigns buyer sign-off and final decision on whether and how research outputs are published.",
      "limit": "Terms of this 2024 engagement, not evidence of authority over separate 2026 incidents.",
      "family": "policy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contractual authority",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s04"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-security-approval",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w49-safeguards-contract",
      "label": "Requires approved security plan",
      "summary": "Schedule 9 requires a security management plan, incident notification and remediation; buyer approval does not relieve supplier obligations.",
      "limit": "The approved plan and evidence of performance were not obtained.",
      "family": "policy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contractual obligation",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s04"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-recorded-payment",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Records £153,000 consultancy payment",
      "summary": "DSIT April 2025 spending ledger records transaction 668259 to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. under AISI consultancy expenditure.",
      "limit": "No contract reference is supplied; do not add this payment to award values as extra money.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "recorded expenditure",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s05"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-04-04"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-dsit-aisi",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Houses government research institute",
      "summary": "AISI identifies itself as a research organization within DSIT.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-aisi-budget",
      "source": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "target": "w49-cyber-budget-study",
      "label": "Co-produces budget-scaling study",
      "summary": "AISI reports joint cyber-evaluation research with Irregular.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-05"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-irregular-budget",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w49-cyber-budget-study",
      "label": "Co-produces budget-scaling study",
      "summary": "Irregular contributes its private cyber evaluations and methods.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-03-05"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-frontiercyber",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w49-frontiercyber",
      "label": "Develops and scores benchmark",
      "summary": "Irregular publishes the FrontierCyber design and scoring method.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s-frontiercyber"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-06-22"
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-e-self-modification",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w49-self-modification-study",
      "label": "Publishes controlled experiment",
      "summary": "Irregular studies agents with permissions to change model checkpoints.",
      "limit": "",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "documented",
      "sources": [
        "w49-s-self-modification"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2026-09-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-gv-first-payment",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Reports $4,533,333 grant payment",
      "summary": "The foundation’s expenditure-responsibility statement dates this instalment of the $6.8 million Pattern Labs award.",
      "limit": "Part of the same February 2024 $6.8m award, not an additional grant. Amount reported paid by the foundation.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported grant payment",
      "sources": [
        "w50-s001",
        "w50-s002"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-03-05"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-gv-second-payment",
      "source": "goodventures",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Reports $2,266,667 grant payment",
      "summary": "The foundation’s expenditure-responsibility statement dates this instalment of the $6.8 million Pattern Labs award.",
      "limit": "Part of the same February 2024 $6.8m award, not an additional grant. Amount reported paid by the foundation.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "reported grant payment",
      "sources": [
        "w50-s001",
        "w50-s002"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-02-04"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-grantee-report",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "goodventures",
      "label": "Grantee report dated 15 March 2025",
      "summary": "Good Ventures records a Pattern Labs grantee report dated 15 March 2025 and $2,639,613 expended.",
      "limit": "The report itself was not obtained. Both returns repeat the same expenditure figure and report date; do not sum them or infer a current balance.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "foundation-reported grant oversight",
      "sources": [
        "w50-s001",
        "w50-s002"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2025-03-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-accessible-award",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "label": "Awards £459,000 for cyber evaluation design",
      "summary": "DSIT awards Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research, contract 6492.",
      "limit": "Distinct from the £459,875 safeguards award; award value, not payment.",
      "family": "funding",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract awarded",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s01",
        "w50-a-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-accessible-supplier",
      "source": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "target": "w47-irregular",
      "label": "Commissions design; preserves commercial reuse",
      "summary": "The contract names Pattern Labs Tech Inc.; it reserves background IP and know-how and allows related commercial evaluation products.",
      "limit": "Actual deliverable acceptance and later product reuse were not established.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contract terms",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-accessible-methods",
      "source": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "target": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "label": "Shapes capability selection and evaluation design",
      "summary": "Schedule 20 commissions research into priority capabilities, test design, coverage justification and advice on other DSIT evaluations.",
      "limit": "Commissioned work, not proof a particular test or release decision adopted the advice.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "commissioned research",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-accessible-approval",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "label": "Retains output approval and publication decision",
      "summary": "Buyer officials sign off final outputs; the buyer decides whether and how research is published.",
      "limit": "Authority under this contract; no 2026 engagement inferred.",
      "family": "policy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contractual authority",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-accessible-qa",
      "source": "w15-impl-dsit",
      "target": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
      "label": "Requires independent QA and supporting data",
      "summary": "The specification requires independent quality assurance and customer access to all data used to produce outputs for its own QA.",
      "limit": "Required rights and procedures; completed QA and acceptance records were not obtained.",
      "family": "policy",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "contractual obligation",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s02"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-aisi-organizes",
      "source": "w41-uk-aisi",
      "target": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
      "label": "Named as conference organizer",
      "summary": "The official response names UK AISI as an organizer.",
      "limit": "Disclosure date. Planned conference 21–22 November 2024; this record does not verify attendance.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "official invitation-related disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s06",
        "w50-a-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-10-07"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-govai-organizes",
      "source": "w50-govai",
      "target": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
      "label": "Named as conference organizer",
      "summary": "The response identifies the Centre for the Governance of AI as an organizer.",
      "limit": "Disclosure date. Planned conference 21–22 November 2024; this record does not verify attendance.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "official invitation-related disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s06",
        "w50-a-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-10-07"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-irregular-invited",
      "source": "w47-irregular",
      "target": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
      "label": "Named in invitation disclosure",
      "summary": "Pattern Labs appears in the organization list disclosed in response to questions about invitations.",
      "limit": "Disclosure date. Planned conference 21–22 November 2024; this record does not verify attendance.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "official invitation-related disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s06",
        "w50-a-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-10-07"
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-e-op-invited",
      "source": "coefficient",
      "target": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
      "label": "Open Philanthropy named in invitation disclosure",
      "summary": "Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving, appears in the disclosed organization list.",
      "limit": "Disclosure date. Planned conference 21–22 November 2024; this record does not verify attendance.",
      "family": "professional",
      "directed": true,
      "status": "documented",
      "stage": "official invitation-related disclosure",
      "sources": [
        "w50-a-s06",
        "w50-a-s07"
      ],
      "recordedDate": "2026-09-19",
      "eventDate": "2024-10-07"
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "src-477c83c16019",
      "title": "5Rights: About us",
      "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-477c83c16019",
        "title": "5Rights: About us",
        "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/about-us/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b7bb716eacc0",
      "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
      "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b7bb716eacc0",
        "title": "5Rights: California Age Appropriate Design Code",
        "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/california-age-appropriate-design-code/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-c401141d51b7",
      "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
      "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-c401141d51b7",
        "title": "UK Parliament: Amendment 84",
        "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b9795844a727",
      "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
      "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b9795844a727",
        "title": "Hansard: Lords debate, 14 July 2026",
        "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-24fdb5685974",
      "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
      "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-24fdb5685974",
        "title": "Collective Shout: payment-processors open letter",
        "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-44c03bd0a530",
      "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-44c03bd0a530",
        "title": "Age Assurance Trial: stakeholder advisory board",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
      "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
      "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
        "title": "itch.io: update on NSFW content",
        "url": "https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-547a5b3ea786",
      "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
      "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-547a5b3ea786",
        "title": "Mastercard: statement on gaming content",
        "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-c5c76c4cf21e",
      "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
      "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-c5c76c4cf21e",
        "title": "Coalition letter opposing AI moratorium, 30 June 2025",
        "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-bad5f974d0c4",
      "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-bad5f974d0c4",
        "title": "Australian department: trial tender award",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-a61d78086a00",
      "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-a61d78086a00",
        "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-d17247535809",
      "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-d17247535809",
        "title": "Australian department: final report announcement",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-81bf267f91d0",
      "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-81bf267f91d0",
        "title": "Retained DIGI April16 letter and departmental acknowledgment",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi25-409-documents-released.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-ef55ca30efaa",
      "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-ef55ca30efaa",
        "title": "ACMA/eSafety annual report 2023–24, p177",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-a82329c94eac",
      "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
      "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-a82329c94eac",
        "title": "WEF: global principles for digital safety, 9 January 2023",
        "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/davos23-global-principles-digital-safety-content/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-aaae21f08c81",
      "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
      "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-aaae21f08c81",
        "title": "NIJ award 2020-75-CX-0011",
        "url": "https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/2020-75-cx-0011",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-f762980e9c03",
      "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
      "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-f762980e9c03",
        "title": "Jensen Project: NCOSE policy advocacy grant recipient",
        "url": "https://www.thejensenproject.org/education-advocacy/2025-policy-advocacy-grant-recipients/national-center-on-exploitation/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-ef8d4d859fc2",
      "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
      "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-ef8d4d859fc2",
        "title": "Pentecost Group: foundation support",
        "url": "https://pentecostgroup.com/foundation/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-73e997a6d1ef",
      "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
      "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829=",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-73e997a6d1ef",
        "title": "Collective Shout: November 2024 Online Safety Codes submission, pp13–14",
        "url": "https://assets.nationbuilder.com/collectiveshout/pages/10514/attachments/original/1733974829/Online_Safety_Codes_2024.pdf?1733974829=",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-71475aa32b34",
      "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-71475aa32b34",
        "title": "FLI June 2021 program announcement",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-5a885dee5911",
      "title": "FLI current finance page",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-5a885dee5911",
        "title": "FLI current finance page",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-95a63bfefeca",
      "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
      "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-95a63bfefeca",
        "title": "Cointelegraph donor-disagreement account, March 2026",
        "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-e4e7930e8216",
      "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
      "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-e4e7930e8216",
        "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
        "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-d7fd807078d3",
      "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
      "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-d7fd807078d3",
        "title": "FLI 2024 IRS return",
        "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-0d707744efd9",
      "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-0d707744efd9",
        "title": "Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview",
        "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b8a63a1347f2",
      "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b8a63a1347f2",
        "title": "FLI Jaan Tallinn biography",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-94263f452256",
      "title": "Good Ventures",
      "url": "https://goodventures.org/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-94263f452256",
        "title": "Good Ventures",
        "url": "https://goodventures.org/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-d451e2202e83",
      "title": "Good Ventures governance",
      "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-d451e2202e83",
        "title": "Good Ventures governance",
        "url": "https://goodventures.org/governance/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-033fd1e2f487",
      "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
      "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-033fd1e2f487",
        "title": "SVCF 2023 Form 990, PDF p87 row 518",
        "url": "https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-4711920c1730",
      "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-4711920c1730",
        "title": "FLI 2023 recommended grants",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-cf6c0895df42",
      "title": "CAIS leadership",
      "url": "https://safe.ai/about",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-cf6c0895df42",
        "title": "CAIS leadership",
        "url": "https://safe.ai/about",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-29f8a10f712c",
      "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-29f8a10f712c",
        "title": "CAIS Action Fund IRS-derived overview",
        "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-8016e12c6894",
      "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
      "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-8016e12c6894",
        "title": "Dan Hendrycks professional biography",
        "url": "https://danhendrycks.com/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-0448f8be81b7",
      "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-0448f8be81b7",
        "title": "FLI Digital Media Accelerator current public programme",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-0764ac1a884e",
      "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-0764ac1a884e",
        "title": "FLI Protect What's Human launch",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-65df3f2c31b3",
      "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
      "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-65df3f2c31b3",
        "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
        "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-c33ab812f862",
      "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
      "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-c33ab812f862",
        "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
        "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1d2091e52111",
      "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
      "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1d2091e52111",
        "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
        "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1a8f761e951d",
      "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
      "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1a8f761e951d",
        "title": "Frame Cohort 2 organizer announcement",
        "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-e07be722d815",
      "title": "ControlAI team",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/about",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-e07be722d815",
        "title": "ControlAI team",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/about",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-2ed7c939cd31",
      "title": "ControlAI UK legal-entity notice",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/privacy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-2ed7c939cd31",
        "title": "ControlAI UK legal-entity notice",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/privacy",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
      "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
        "title": "Secure Future Research PSC record",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-6a9425acbb0c",
      "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-6a9425acbb0c",
        "title": "Secure Future Research officers",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-23397b6fa896",
      "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
      "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-23397b6fa896",
        "title": "Control AI US German lobby registration",
        "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-a96ee8404df0",
      "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
      "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-a96ee8404df0",
        "title": "Connor Leahy Conjecture retrospective",
        "url": "https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1b802ead5bff",
      "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1b802ead5bff",
        "title": "Conjecture April 2022 launch",
        "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jfq2BH5kfQqu2vYv3/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-e7bf79d5bdc8",
      "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-e7bf79d5bdc8",
        "title": "Miotti September 2025 parliamentary biography",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-42725da209c6",
      "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
      "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-42725da209c6",
        "title": "Eva Behrens professional site",
        "url": "https://www.evabehrens.com/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-8638b6bbbdfc",
      "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
      "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-8638b6bbbdfc",
        "title": "Conjecture May 2025 privacy notice",
        "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-f40ef2b0252e",
      "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
      "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-f40ef2b0252e",
        "title": "Balde German lobbying registration",
        "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-e996011534a6",
      "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-e996011534a6",
        "title": "ControlAI April 2026 funding and operating plan",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-604eca7e0531",
      "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
      "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-604eca7e0531",
        "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach job",
        "url": "https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-eb7a62848703",
      "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/dip",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-eb7a62848703",
        "title": "ControlAI Direct Institutional Plan",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/dip",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-22304018d7f5",
      "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
      "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-22304018d7f5",
        "title": "ControlAI 2025 impact report",
        "url": "https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-f4fef5547775",
      "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
      "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-f4fef5547775",
        "title": "Browne retirement, 23 February 2026",
        "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-02-23/debates/63012b7e-64cc-40bd-98e8-c02b7371cfe7/LordsChamber",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b2d0264369e7",
      "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b2d0264369e7",
        "title": "Browne committee testimony, Q8, 17 March 2025",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15590/html/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-5747555ff9d7",
      "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
      "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-5747555ff9d7",
        "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
        "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-9982667e53da",
      "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
      "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-9982667e53da",
        "title": "ControlAI 22-page proposed ASI bill",
        "url": "https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b6e607a7fd65",
      "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
      "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b6e607a7fd65",
        "title": "Parliament 4 September 2026 schedule",
        "url": "https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1bdb2fcb24d8",
      "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
      "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1bdb2fcb24d8",
        "title": "Commons NC12 official status",
        "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-8efa5883d584",
      "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
      "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-8efa5883d584",
        "title": "Middle-powers proposal, November 2025",
        "url": "https://asi-prevention.com/How_middle_powers_may_prevent_the_development_of_artificial_superintelligence.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-a69f9d4e2a03",
      "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
      "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-a69f9d4e2a03",
        "title": "Talos funding disclosure",
        "url": "https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-210ecbb4dfbb",
      "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
      "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-210ecbb4dfbb",
        "title": "CFG funding disclosure",
        "url": "https://cfg.eu/funding/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-11e9bb8515f1",
      "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
      "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-11e9bb8515f1",
        "title": "CDI October 2022 Behrens biography",
        "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-7f2794f6a070",
      "title": "CDI institutional identity",
      "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-7f2794f6a070",
        "title": "CDI institutional identity",
        "url": "https://datainnovation.org/about/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-4fe7b92dcece",
      "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
      "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-4fe7b92dcece",
        "title": "Behrens electronic-ID article, 18 October 2022",
        "url": "https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/record-matching-will-make-european-electronic-ids-error-prone-and-inconvenient/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-5e4e930cec53",
      "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
      "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-5e4e930cec53",
        "title": "Fabian Society executive observed September 2026",
        "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-people/executive-committee-2017-19/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-dc138c91500c",
      "title": "Fabian Society history",
      "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-dc138c91500c",
        "title": "Fabian Society history",
        "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/our-history/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1bc441d0528b",
      "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
      "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1bc441d0528b",
        "title": "Fabian annual report 2012, printed p2",
        "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-2012.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-dbb8d89ffb52",
      "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
      "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-dbb8d89ffb52",
        "title": "Fabian Labour Country report, March 2018",
        "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FABJ6015-Rural-Labour-Report-180320-WEB.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-6dbd58c5e8f8",
      "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
      "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-6dbd58c5e8f8",
        "title": "Fabian Opportunity Mission Summit, June 2025",
        "url": "https://fabians.org.uk/event/fabian-society-opportunity-mission-summit/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-8e230246a046",
      "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/statement",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-8e230246a046",
        "title": "ControlAI UK campaign supporter statement",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/statement",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-c7e428b699d3",
      "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
      "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-c7e428b699d3",
        "title": "WEF republication with Browne coauthorship, 2015",
        "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/03/4-steps-to-improving-nuclear-security/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-3db31f719414",
      "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
      "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-3db31f719414",
        "title": "NTI-WEF roundtable report, 21 September 2017",
        "url": "https://www.nti.org/news/nti-and-world-economic-forum-partner-discuss-biological-risks-posed-advances-technology/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-0f5ce69a6784",
      "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-0f5ce69a6784",
        "title": "LTF January 2026 FEC filing",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-6460d3b558f5",
      "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-6460d3b558f5",
        "title": "LTF Q1 2026 Form 3X",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-8806cf368b7f",
      "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
      "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-8806cf368b7f",
        "title": "FEC committee C00916114",
        "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00916114/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-9d9e4fbe80b2",
      "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-9d9e4fbe80b2",
        "title": "Anthropic July 2026 support disclosure",
        "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-90f14526fca6",
      "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
      "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-90f14526fca6",
        "title": "WIRED reported influencer pitch",
        "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-palantir-is-paying-tiktok-influencers-to-fear-monger-about-china/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-478c52027034",
      "title": "Omidyar biography",
      "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-478c52027034",
        "title": "Omidyar biography",
        "url": "https://omidyar.com/people/pierre-omidyar/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-81ff54e1c713",
      "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
      "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-81ff54e1c713",
        "title": "2021 tax return · p11",
        "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2021-ONFI-Fed-990-PF_PUBLIC.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1e184fdc4ff9",
      "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
      "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1e184fdc4ff9",
        "title": "2023 tax return · p11",
        "url": "https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-ONFI-Federal-990-PF-tax-return.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1f9134b8bbcc",
      "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
      "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1f9134b8bbcc",
        "title": "Omidyar campaign statement",
        "url": "https://omidyar.com/update/omidyar-network-applauds-californias-landmark-first-of-its-kind-childrens-online-safety-law/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-55256b9868ae",
      "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-55256b9868ae",
        "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-4a4bb675ee5f",
      "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-4a4bb675ee5f",
        "title": "Oak annual report · pp4–5",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Oak-Annual-Report-2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-5046aaa630e7",
      "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-5046aaa630e7",
        "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-33a85b0bc3bd",
      "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
      "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-33a85b0bc3bd",
        "title": "Prudence publisher grant data",
        "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-PrudenceTrust-PT-0156",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-421fa29c369c",
      "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
      "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-421fa29c369c",
        "title": "Rothschild publisher grant data",
        "url": "https://grantnav.threesixtygiving.org/grant/360G-RothschildFdn-2026_3732",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-576f1b1b6fa2",
      "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
      "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-576f1b1b6fa2",
        "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
        "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-c2da4caaaa8e",
      "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-c2da4caaaa8e",
        "title": "UK strategy · paragraph 236",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-strategy-accessible-version",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-953ce6b745ed",
      "title": "WeProtect governance",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-953ce6b745ed",
        "title": "WeProtect governance",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/about-us/governance/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-2af30dede1cb",
      "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-2af30dede1cb",
        "title": "WeProtect board minutes · p2",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-July-2022.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-50b299128d80",
      "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
      "url": "https://casir.org/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-50b299128d80",
        "title": "CASIR draft homepage",
        "url": "https://casir.org/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-5c7f3011d794",
      "title": "CASIR draft governance",
      "url": "https://casir.org/governance",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-5c7f3011d794",
        "title": "CASIR draft governance",
        "url": "https://casir.org/governance",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-1f84b8a8e5b4",
      "title": "CASIR draft charter",
      "url": "https://casir.org/charter",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-1f84b8a8e5b4",
        "title": "CASIR draft charter",
        "url": "https://casir.org/charter",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-9537facf4ef2",
      "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
      "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-9537facf4ef2",
        "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
        "url": "https://www.longview.org/about/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-ac43e1b525d3",
      "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-ac43e1b525d3",
        "title": "Prior investigation primary source",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2308.14752v1",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-4cc57af3ad93",
      "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
      "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-4cc57af3ad93",
        "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
        "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/65/?order=ASC&orderby=title",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b4a2b9e3261c",
      "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
      "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b4a2b9e3261c",
        "title": "Historical Good Ventures grant index · retrieval limited",
        "url": "https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-ed3d2ac6a354",
      "title": "Frame: mission and team",
      "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-ed3d2ac6a354",
        "title": "Frame: mission and team",
        "url": "https://framefellowship.com/manifesto",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-6df46b543f84",
      "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-6df46b543f84",
        "title": "Singh: Frame retrospective · 12 Jun 2026",
        "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ALBdBRas7G3kdbPSq/the-quest-to-find-the-next-big-communicators-in-ai-safety",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-7e9b476e322d",
      "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
      "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-7e9b476e322d",
        "title": "Mozie: Frame customer case study",
        "url": "https://mozie.app/customers/frame-fellowship",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-685569dc8514",
      "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
      "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-685569dc8514",
        "title": "Mox 2026 fundraiser · budget and programmes",
        "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/mox-2026-fundraiser",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-27738cfd6708",
      "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
      "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-27738cfd6708",
        "title": "Austin Chen: Find funding, fast · 8 Jul 2026",
        "url": "https://manifund.substack.com/p/find-funding-fast",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-808a0af999fb",
      "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
      "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-808a0af999fb",
        "title": "ECLAG: formation, steering and campaign",
        "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/eclag/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-cda852240051",
      "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
      "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-cda852240051",
        "title": "Child Safety ON: campaign and supporters",
        "url": "https://childsafetyineurope.com/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-306689bfa358",
      "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-306689bfa358",
        "title": "WeProtect EU advocacy hub · updated 10 Jan 2023",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/response/policy-legislation/eu-legislation-prevent-child-sexual-abuse-online/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-12639f108d96",
      "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-12639f108d96",
        "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-9e1956e1c0db",
      "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-9e1956e1c0db",
        "title": "WeProtect Policy Plan 2023–25 · pp5–6",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Plan.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-3bc8f45060eb",
      "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-3bc8f45060eb",
        "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2024",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/June-2024-Board-Minutes.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-718684d59ccd",
      "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-718684d59ccd",
        "title": "WeProtect board minutes · June 2023",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance-Board-minutes-June-2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-094404b86089",
      "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
      "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-094404b86089",
        "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
        "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-767c5b45b782",
      "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
      "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-767c5b45b782",
        "title": "Mastercard Rules · 3 Jun 2025 · §§5.1.2, 5.12.7",
        "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/fi_fi/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/mastercard-rules.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-b1a700934b28",
      "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-b1a700934b28",
        "title": "CAIS 2023 Schedule D · Part X",
        "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202511609349300741/IRS990ScheduleD",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-f3950ad6f80e",
      "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
      "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-f3950ad6f80e",
        "title": "FTX debtors, Doc 4862 · 16 Dec 2023 · printed p34 / PDF p40",
        "url": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4271736&projectCode=FTX&source=DM",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-14c9e7f34568",
      "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-14c9e7f34568",
        "title": "CAIS 2024 Form 990 · Part X",
        "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "src-2615708ffd63",
      "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "src-2615708ffd63",
        "title": "CAIS 2024 Schedule D · Part X",
        "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/full_text/202503219349323615/IRS990ScheduleD",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-icmec-donors",
      "title": "ICMEC supporters",
      "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-icmec-donors",
        "title": "ICMEC supporters",
        "url": "https://www.icmec.org/our-supporters/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-ab1043-analysis",
      "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
      "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-ab1043-analysis",
        "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
        "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-wicks-drafting",
      "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
      "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-wicks-drafting",
        "title": "Wicks announcement, March25,2025",
        "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250325-assemblymember-buffy-wicks-and-senator-tom-umberg-join-forces-digital-age",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-wicks-support",
      "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
      "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-wicks-support",
        "title": "Wicks endorsement announcement, September9,2025",
        "url": "https://wicks.asmdc.org/press-releases/20250909-google-meta-among-tech-leaders-and-child-advocates-voicing-support-wicks",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-age-paper",
      "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-age-paper",
        "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-age-paper-copy",
      "title": "AgeVerificationPolicy.org copy of device-based proposal",
      "url": "https://www.ageverificationpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-age-paper-copy",
        "title": "AgeVerificationPolicy.org copy of device-based proposal",
        "url": "https://www.ageverificationpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-windows",
      "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
      "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-windows",
        "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
        "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-discord-methods",
      "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
      "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-discord-methods",
        "title": "Discord methods and provider disclosures",
        "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/30326565624343-How-to-Complete-Age-Assurance-on-Discord",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-kid-methods",
      "title": "k-ID verification methods",
      "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-kid-methods",
        "title": "k-ID verification methods",
        "url": "https://docs.k-id.com/concepts/verification-methods/",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-kid-privacy",
      "title": "k-ID privacy policy",
      "url": "https://k-id.com/privacy-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-kid-privacy",
        "title": "k-ID privacy policy",
        "url": "https://k-id.com/privacy-policy",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-wallet",
      "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
      "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-wallet",
        "title": "Google Wallet ID-pass setup and sharing",
        "url": "https://support.google.com/wallet/answer/15284332?hl=en-GB",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-discord-incident",
      "title": "Discord support incident statement",
      "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-discord-incident",
        "title": "Discord support incident statement",
        "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/update-on-security-incident-involving-third-party-customer-service",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-5ca-response",
      "title": "5CA incident response",
      "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-5ca-response",
        "title": "5CA incident response",
        "url": "https://5ca.com/blog/holding-statement-security-incident/",
        "notes": [
          "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-idscan-notice",
      "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
      "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-idscan-notice",
        "title": "IDScan security-incident notification",
        "url": "https://idscan.net/notification-data-security-incident/",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "s2-idscan-casestudy",
      "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
      "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "s2-idscan-casestudy",
        "title": "IDScan Planet13 case study",
        "url": "https://idscan.net/case-study/the-worlds-largest-cannabis-dispensary-sets-a-high-standard-for-age-verification-fake-id-detection/",
        "notes": [
          "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-audit",
      "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-audit",
        "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-990",
      "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-990",
        "title": "ICMEC Form 990 public disclosure 2024",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ICMEC-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-2024-signed.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-apfc",
      "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
      "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-apfc",
        "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
        "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-model",
      "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-model",
        "title": "Digital Age Assurance model state legislation",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-sjud25",
      "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
      "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-sjud25",
        "title": "AB1043 Senate Judiciary analysis",
        "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-07/ab-1043-wicks-sjud-analysis.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-ab1043",
      "title": "AB1043 chaptered text and version selector",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-ab1043",
        "title": "AB1043 chaptered text and version selector",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-apcp26",
      "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
      "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-apcp26",
        "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
        "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-ab1856",
      "title": "AB1856 enrolled text",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-ab1856",
        "title": "AB1856 enrolled text",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-icmec-s-ab1856-status",
      "title": "AB1856 official status",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-icmec-s-ab1856-status",
        "title": "AB1856 official status",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1856",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-us-return",
      "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
      "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-us-return",
        "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
        "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-us-index",
      "title": "IRS 2026 XML index, selected Control AI US Inc row",
      "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/index_2026.csv",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-us-index",
        "title": "IRS 2026 XML index, selected Control AI US Inc row",
        "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/index_2026.csv",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-uk-articles",
      "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-uk-articles",
        "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-uk-history",
      "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd Companies House filing history",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-uk-history",
        "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd Companies House filing history",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-uk-accounts",
      "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd 2025 filleted unaudited micro-entity accounts",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1&format=xhtml",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-uk-accounts",
        "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd 2025 filleted unaudited micro-entity accounts",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1&format=xhtml",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-german-us",
      "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
      "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-german-us",
        "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister ControlAI US current original JSON, R007795 version3",
        "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007795/73774",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-controlai-s-german-balde",
      "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
      "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-controlai-s-german-balde",
        "title": "Bundestag Lobbyregister Amir Benjamin Balde current original JSON, R007864 version2",
        "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R007864/73776",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-itch-admin-20230426",
      "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
      "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-itch-admin-20230426",
        "title": "itch.io admin explanation of selected payout disqualifications",
        "url": "https://itch.io/post/7697194",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-itch-payout-notice",
      "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
      "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-itch-payout-notice",
        "title": "itch.io original payout-unavailability notice template",
        "url": "https://itch.io/static/payouts_unavailable.html",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-valve-reply-20250717",
      "title": "Valve press reply received by GamingOnLinux on July 17, 2025",
      "url": "",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-valve-reply-20250717",
        "title": "Valve press reply received by GamingOnLinux on July 17, 2025",
        "url": "",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250717",
      "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
      "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250717",
        "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
        "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-valve-reply-20250801",
      "title": "Valve press reply received by GamingOnLinux on August 1, 2025",
      "url": "",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-valve-reply-20250801",
        "title": "Valve press reply received by GamingOnLinux on August 1, 2025",
        "url": "",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801",
      "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
      "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801",
        "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
        "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-gol-itch-20250801",
      "title": "Contemporaneous reproduction of itch's Stripe bank-restrictions account",
      "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/itch-io-to-reindex-free-adult-content-as-they-search-for-new-payment-processors/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-gol-itch-20250801",
        "title": "Contemporaneous reproduction of itch's Stripe bank-restrictions account",
        "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/itch-io-to-reindex-free-adult-content-as-they-search-for-new-payment-processors/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727",
      "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
      "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727",
        "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
        "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-exo-osa-20250729",
      "title": "Dated compiler excerpt linking original itch OSA update",
      "url": "https://www.exodrifter.space/entries/20250729193646",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-exo-osa-20250729",
        "title": "Dated compiler excerpt linking original itch OSA update",
        "url": "https://www.exodrifter.space/entries/20250729193646",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-stripe-policy-cdx",
      "title": "Wayback CDX metadata for Stripe restricted-businesses July 2025 captures",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/cdx/search/cdx?url=stripe.com%2Flegal%2Frestricted-businesses&output=json&filter=statuscode%3A200&from=20250701&to=20250802&fl=timestamp%2Coriginal%2Cdigest",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-stripe-policy-cdx",
        "title": "Wayback CDX metadata for Stripe restricted-businesses July 2025 captures",
        "url": "https://web.archive.org/cdx/search/cdx?url=stripe.com%2Flegal%2Frestricted-businesses&output=json&filter=statuscode%3A200&from=20250701&to=20250802&fl=timestamp%2Coriginal%2Cdigest",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-stripe-policy-20250721",
      "title": "Identified pre-event Stripe restricted-businesses archive capture",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250721113801/https://stripe.com/legal/restricted-businesses",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-stripe-policy-20250721",
        "title": "Identified pre-event Stripe restricted-businesses archive capture",
        "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250721113801/https://stripe.com/legal/restricted-businesses",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-exo-discord-excluded",
      "title": "Discord transcription excluded from event evidence",
      "url": "https://www.exodrifter.space/entries/20250725062034",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-exo-discord-excluded",
        "title": "Discord transcription excluded from event evidence",
        "url": "https://www.exodrifter.space/entries/20250725062034",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-payments-src-stripe-ssa-current",
      "title": "Current Stripe Services Agreement, background only",
      "url": "https://stripe.com/legal/ssa",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-payments-src-stripe-ssa-current",
        "title": "Current Stripe Services Agreement, background only",
        "url": "https://stripe.com/legal/ssa",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-s-audit25",
      "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
      "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-s-audit25",
        "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
        "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-s-founding",
      "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
      "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-s-founding",
        "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
        "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-s-supervision",
      "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
      "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-s-supervision",
        "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
        "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-s-bundestag",
      "title": "FLI German lobby-register entry R000227",
      "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R000227",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-s-bundestag",
        "title": "FLI German lobby-register entry R000227",
        "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R000227",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-s-geneva-route",
      "title": "Geneva free public registry access guidance",
      "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-donnees-libre-acces",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-s-geneva-route",
        "title": "Geneva free public registry access guidance",
        "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-donnees-libre-acces",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w2-fli-s-geneva-dossier",
      "title": "Geneva physical dossier consultation",
      "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-dossier-physique-entreprise",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w2-fli-s-geneva-dossier",
        "title": "Geneva physical dossier consultation",
        "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-dossier-physique-entreprise",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-sabine",
      "title": "Supplied Sabine transcript",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-sabine",
        "title": "Supplied Sabine transcript",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-mateus",
      "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-mateus",
        "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-rational",
      "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-rational",
        "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-controlai-rational",
      "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-controlai-rational",
        "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
        "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script",
      "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
      "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script",
        "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
        "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-scishow",
      "title": "SciShow: We Have Lost Control of AI",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90C3XVjUMqE",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-scishow",
        "title": "SciShow: We Have Lost Control of AI",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90C3XVjUMqE",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-creator-s-veronica",
      "title": "Hey AI: An AI Just Retaliated Against a Developer",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F3CdYoNzyw",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-creator-s-veronica",
        "title": "Hey AI: An AI Just Retaliated Against a Developer",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F3CdYoNzyw",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-publications",
      "title": "Trial original publication index",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/publications/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-publications",
        "title": "Trial original publication index",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/publications/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-march-minutes",
      "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-march-minutes",
        "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-april-minutes",
      "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-april-minutes",
        "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-june-minutes",
      "title": "June 17, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-17-June-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-june-minutes",
        "title": "June 17, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-17-June-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-july-minutes",
      "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-july-minutes",
        "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-evaluation",
      "title": "D-2.9 Evaluation Proposal, dated February 6, 2025",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/D-2.9-Evaluation-Proposal-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-evaluation",
        "title": "D-2.9 Evaluation Proposal, dated February 6, 2025",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/D-2.9-Evaluation-Proposal-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-human-protocol",
      "title": "A-1.3.1 Human Test Subjects Protocol, V1.3 filename",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/A-1.3.1-Human-Test-Subjects-Protocol-V1.3.docx",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-human-protocol",
        "title": "A-1.3.1 Human Test Subjects Protocol, V1.3 filename",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/A-1.3.1-Human-Test-Subjects-Protocol-V1.3.docx",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-final-responses",
      "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
      "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-final-responses",
        "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
        "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-procurement-brief",
      "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-procurement-brief",
        "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-gst-register",
      "title": "FOI26-176 indexed GST-labelled contract register",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-26-176_documents-released.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-gst-register",
        "title": "FOI26-176 indexed GST-labelled contract register",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-26-176_documents-released.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-foi26154-failed",
      "title": "Retained FOI26-154 contract-register retrieval gap",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-26-154_documents-released.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-foi26154-failed",
        "title": "Retained FOI26-154 contract-register retrieval gap",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-26-154_documents-released.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-foi25288-failed",
      "title": "FOI25-288 independent departmental register-copy route",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-288_documents_released.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-foi25288-failed",
        "title": "FOI25-288 independent departmental register-copy route",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-288_documents_released.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w1-australia-src-austender-failed",
      "title": "Original AusTender CN4111198 entry",
      "url": "https://www.tenders.gov.au/Cn/Show/77f527297b2c4c218e5f99476707aa98",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w1-australia-src-austender-failed",
        "title": "Original AusTender CN4111198 entry",
        "url": "https://www.tenders.gov.au/Cn/Show/77f527297b2c4c218e5f99476707aa98",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-index",
      "title": "DOJ FARA7427 document index",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/ords/fara/f?p=API:REGISTRANTDOCS-F_HTML:::::F_HTML_REG_NUM,F_HTML_CC,F_HTML_DOC_TYPE:7427,,",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-index",
        "title": "DOJ FARA7427 document index",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/ords/fara/f?p=API:REGISTRANTDOCS-F_HTML:::::F_HTML_REG_NUM,F_HTML_CC,F_HTML_DOC_TYPE:7427,,",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-14",
      "title": "Advocacy explainer bundle",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-14.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-14",
        "title": "Advocacy explainer bundle",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-14.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-15",
      "title": "5Rights support letter to Chris Holden",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-15.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-15",
        "title": "5Rights support letter to Chris Holden",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-15.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-16",
      "title": "UK and California code background note",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-16.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-16",
        "title": "UK and California code background note",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-16.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-17",
      "title": "Frances Haugen support letter to Assembly Appropriations",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-17.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-17",
        "title": "Frances Haugen support letter to Assembly Appropriations",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-17.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-18",
      "title": "5Rights sponsor letter to Anthony Portantino",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-18.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-18",
        "title": "5Rights sponsor letter to Anthony Portantino",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-18.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-19",
      "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-19",
        "title": "Coalition support letter to Umberg and Senate Judiciary",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-19.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-20",
      "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-20",
        "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Anthony Portantino",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-20.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-21",
      "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-21",
        "title": "AB2273 / UK AADC comparison chart",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-21.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-22",
      "title": "Data for Progress polling tables",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-22.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-22",
        "title": "Data for Progress polling tables",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-22.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-23",
      "title": "Coalition Assembly concurrence floor alert",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-23.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-23",
        "title": "Coalition Assembly concurrence floor alert",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-23.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-24",
      "title": "Coalition Senate floor alert",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-24.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-24",
        "title": "Coalition Senate floor alert",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-24.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-25",
      "title": "Coalition Assembly floor alert",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-25.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-25",
        "title": "Coalition Assembly floor alert",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-25.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-material-26",
      "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
      "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-material-26",
        "title": "Beeban Kidron letter to Henry Stern",
        "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Informational-Materials-20240627-26.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-analysis-352148",
      "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-analysis-352148",
        "title": "Senate Judiciary analysis, June28 hearing",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-analysis-355438",
      "title": "Senate Floor analysis after August22 amendments",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-analysis-355438",
        "title": "Senate Floor analysis after August22 amendments",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-analysis-356279",
      "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-analysis-356279",
        "title": "Assembly concurrence in Senate amendments",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-5r-s-chapter",
      "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-5r-s-chapter",
        "title": "AB2273 historical chaptered2022 text",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2273",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-grant-process",
      "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-grant-process",
        "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-grant-making",
      "title": "Oak current grant-making guidance",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/grant-making/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-grant-making",
        "title": "Oak current grant-making guidance",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/grant-making/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-faq",
      "title": "Oak current FAQ",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/faq/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-faq",
        "title": "Oak current FAQ",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/faq/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
      "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
        "title": "Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance annual accounts 2023",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-31-12-2023-consolidated-financial-statements-signed-by-directors.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-wp-minutes-dec2023",
      "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-wp-minutes-dec2023",
        "title": "WeProtect Policy Board December 2023 summary",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Dec-2023-Board-Minutes.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-wp-review2023",
      "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-wp-review2023",
        "title": "WeProtect Annual Review 2023",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-european-survey",
      "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
      "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-european-survey",
        "title": "Economist Impact/WeProtect European survey 2023",
        "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-Global-Alliance_Economist-Impact_English-full-report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-about",
      "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
      "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-about",
        "title": "Safe Futures Hub about and team",
        "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/about",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-review",
      "title": "Safe Futures 2024 review, blocked compressed filename",
      "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/SFH-ER-WEB-DEF-compressed.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-review",
        "title": "Safe Futures 2024 review, blocked compressed filename",
        "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/SFH-ER-WEB-DEF-compressed.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-guidance",
      "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
      "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-guidance",
        "title": "Practice-based knowledge Guidance Framework 2025",
        "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/practice-based-knowledge-guidance-framework.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute",
      "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
      "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute",
        "title": "Building Safe Futures evidence review 2024",
        "url": "https://cdn.safefutureshub.org/files/building-safe-futures.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-team",
      "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-team",
        "title": "Oak team: Helena Duch role and institutional governance",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/about/meet-our-team-members/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-publication",
      "title": "Building Safe Futures publication/version page",
      "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/resources/building-safe-futures-solutions-to-end-childhood-sexual-violence",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-oak-safe-futures-publication",
        "title": "Building Safe Futures publication/version page",
        "url": "https://www.safefutureshub.org/resources/building-safe-futures-solutions-to-end-childhood-sexual-violence",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-march-original",
      "title": "Think Big April monthly original, March 2026",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202604209863252970/202604209863252970.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-march-original",
        "title": "Think Big April monthly original, March 2026",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202604209863252970/202604209863252970.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-march-amended",
      "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-march-amended",
        "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-yearend",
      "title": "Think Big 2025 year-end Form 3X",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/761/202601309794859761/202601309794859761.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-yearend",
        "title": "Think Big 2025 year-end Form 3X",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/761/202601309794859761/202601309794859761.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-rfai",
      "title": "FEC request for additional information on Think Big March report",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/700/202604260300345700/202604260300345700.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-rfai",
        "title": "FEC request for additional information on Think Big March report",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/700/202604260300345700/202604260300345700.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-clc",
      "title": "CLC and Sophia Gonsalves-Brown complaint, American Mission and Think Big",
      "url": "https://campaignlegal.org/sites/default/files/2026-05/AISubvendorComplaintFinal%20%281%29.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-clc",
        "title": "CLC and Sophia Gonsalves-Brown complaint, American Mission and Think Big",
        "url": "https://campaignlegal.org/sites/default/files/2026-05/AISubvendorComplaintFinal%20%281%29.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-ao",
      "title": "FEC Advisory Opinion 1983-25",
      "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/1983-25/1983-25.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-ao",
        "title": "FEC Advisory Opinion 1983-25",
        "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/1983-25/1983-25.pdf",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-citystate",
      "title": "City & State: Alex Bores vs. AI in NY-12",
      "url": "https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2026/01/alex-bores-vs-ai-ny-12/410958/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-citystate",
        "title": "City & State: Alex Bores vs. AI in NY-12",
        "url": "https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2026/01/alex-bores-vs-ai-ny-12/410958/",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-index",
      "title": "FEC Think Big report index",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00923417",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-index",
        "title": "FEC Think Big report index",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00923417",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-ltf-index",
      "title": "FEC LTF report index",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00916114",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-ltf-index",
        "title": "FEC LTF report index",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00916114",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-ad-metadata",
      "title": "Think Big linked original ad page, title only",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpPL7jY-9pI",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-ad-metadata",
        "title": "Think Big linked original ad page, title only",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpPL7jY-9pI",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-opp-s-june-notice",
      "title": "Think Big June17 rapid IE notice, FEC-1984147",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00923417/1984147/se",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-opp-s-june-notice",
        "title": "Think Big June17 rapid IE notice, FEC-1984147",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00923417/1984147/se",
        "notes": []
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-us-impact2024",
      "title": "ICMEC international impact report2024",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-Impact-Report-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-us-impact2024",
        "title": "ICMEC international impact report2024",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-Impact-Report-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-westpac2024",
      "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
      "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-westpac2024",
        "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
        "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-westpac2025",
      "title": "Westpac 2025 update, published April2026",
      "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2025-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-westpac2025",
        "title": "Westpac 2025 update, published April2026",
        "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2025-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor",
      "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor",
        "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024",
      "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
      "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024",
        "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
        "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-au-about",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-au-about",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-au-age",
      "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-au-age",
        "title": "Colm Gannon: age assurance and device architecture",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/age-assurance-and-the-case-for-building-safety-into-the-device/",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w3-icmec-s-westpac-response",
      "title": "Westpac response plan: September2020 update",
      "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/media/Response%20Plan.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w3-icmec-s-westpac-response",
        "title": "Westpac response plan: September2020 update",
        "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/media/Response%20Plan.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-5r-s-archive-resources",
      "title": "California State Archives: legislative resources",
      "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/collections/legislative-resources",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-5r-s-archive-resources",
        "title": "California State Archives: legislative resources",
        "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/collections/legislative-resources",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-5r-s-reference",
      "title": "California State Archives: reference services",
      "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/services/reference-services",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-5r-s-reference",
        "title": "California State Archives: reference services",
        "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/services/reference-services",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-5rights-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-abn",
      "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
      "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-abn",
        "title": "ABN86645682828 current legal/business-name record",
        "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/86645682828",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-fs2022",
      "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-fs2022",
        "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2022",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ICMEC-2022-Consolidated-FS-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-fs2023",
      "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-fs2023",
        "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-westpac2021",
      "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
      "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-westpac2021",
        "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
        "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-westpac2024",
      "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
      "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-westpac2024",
        "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
        "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-programme",
      "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
      "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-programme",
        "title": "Westpac current Safer Children programme page",
        "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-acnc-profile",
      "title": "ACNC public profile, contents unavailable",
      "url": "https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/72001f82-e5d3-eb11-bacc-000d3a6aca25/profile",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-acnc-profile",
        "title": "ACNC public profile, contents unavailable",
        "url": "https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/72001f82-e5d3-eb11-bacc-000d3a6aca25/profile",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-acnc-ais2024",
      "title": "ACNC AIS2024 title/locator only, financial contents unavailable",
      "url": "https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/72001f82-e5d3-eb11-bacc-000d3a6aca25/documents/7af1f05b-5426-f011-8c4d-002248127014",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-acnc-ais2024",
        "title": "ACNC AIS2024 title/locator only, financial contents unavailable",
        "url": "https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/72001f82-e5d3-eb11-bacc-000d3a6aca25/documents/7af1f05b-5426-f011-8c4d-002248127014",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-fin-s-governance404",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia governance URL returned404",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-fin-s-governance404",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia governance URL returned404",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/governance/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-s-about",
      "title": "SaferAI coalition publication index",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-about-the-coalition/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-s-about",
        "title": "SaferAI coalition publication index",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-about-the-coalition/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-s-launch",
      "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-s-launch",
        "title": "SaferAI inaugural discussion paper launch notice",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/saferai-for-children-coalition-discussion-paper/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-s-paper",
      "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
      "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-s-paper",
        "title": "AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future",
        "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/Website%20Resources/AI%20&%20Child%20Protection%20A%20Collaborative%20Approach%20to%20a%20Safer%20Future%20(SaferAI%20for%20Children%20Coalition)%20(3).pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-s-call",
      "title": "A national call to action: Prioritising child safety in the age of AI",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/A-national-call-to-action-Prioritising-child-safety-in-the-age-of-AI-ICMEC-Australia-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-s-call",
        "title": "A national call to action: Prioritising child safety in the age of AI",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/A-national-call-to-action-Prioritising-child-safety-in-the-age-of-AI-ICMEC-Australia-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-s-tas-review",
      "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
      "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-s-tas-review",
        "title": "Woolcott Independent Review report Part A",
        "url": "https://assets.keepingchildrensafe.tas.gov.au/media/documents/Independent_Review_Report_Final_Part_A_31_Oct_25.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit",
      "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit",
        "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-s-kablamo",
      "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
      "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-s-kablamo",
        "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
        "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-s-symposium2024",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
      "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-s-symposium2024",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
        "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-s-our-work",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia: Our Work",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-our-work/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-s-our-work",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia: Our Work",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-our-work/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-s-no-bank-paper",
      "title": "No Bank Left Behind, July 2026",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ICMEC-Australia-Insights-Paper-No-Bank-Left-Behind-2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-s-no-bank-paper",
        "title": "No Bank Left Behind, July 2026",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ICMEC-Australia-Insights-Paper-No-Bank-Left-Behind-2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman",
      "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
      "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman",
        "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
        "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w4-lh-s-privacy-unavailable",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia privacy-policy URL: original unavailable on this route",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/privacy-policy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w4-lh-s-privacy-unavailable",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia privacy-policy URL: original unavailable on this route",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/privacy-policy/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-page",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia actual linked governance page",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-australia-governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-page",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia actual linked governance page",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-australia-governance/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution2025",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution2025",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-charter",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-charter",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-conflicts",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-conflicts",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-board",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-board",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-media-constitution",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia public publisher media metadata: constitution",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=constitution&per_page=30",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-media-constitution",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia public publisher media metadata: constitution",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=constitution&per_page=30",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution-reformatted",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia reformatted proposed constitution publication",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution-reformatted",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia reformatted proposed constitution publication",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution-proposed",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia proposed27July2023 constitution publication",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/FOR-WEBSITE-ICMEC-AU-Proposed-Constitution-27-July-2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution-proposed",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia proposed27July2023 constitution publication",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/FOR-WEBSITE-ICMEC-AU-Proposed-Constitution-27-July-2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-media-audit",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia publisher media search: audit",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=audit&per_page=30",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-media-audit",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia publisher media search: audit",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=audit&per_page=30",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-media-financial",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia publisher media search: financial",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=financial&per_page=30",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-media-financial",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia publisher media search: financial",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=financial&per_page=30",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-nonconduit",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia Non-Conduit Policy2026 linked original",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Non-Conduit-Policy-2026-FINAL-Website-Version.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-nonconduit",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia Non-Conduit Policy2026 linked original",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Non-Conduit-Policy-2026-FINAL-Website-Version.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution2025-alt",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia alternative May2025 constitution media1409",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-gov-s-constitution2025-alt",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia alternative May2025 constitution media1409",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-s-paper",
      "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
      "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-s-paper",
        "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
        "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-s-foi",
      "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-s-foi",
        "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-s-record",
      "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
      "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-s-record",
        "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
        "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-s-dfc",
      "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
      "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-s-dfc",
        "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
        "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-enc-s-launch",
      "title": "5Rights report launch notice",
      "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/guiding-principles-for-addressing-technology-facilitated-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-enc-s-launch",
        "title": "5Rights report launch notice",
        "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/resource/guiding-principles-for-addressing-technology-facilitated-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-s-childlight",
      "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
      "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-s-childlight",
        "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
        "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-s-jss2023",
      "title": "Jesuit Social Services 2023 Australian men study",
      "url": "https://cdn.jss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/20105310/Identifying-and-understanding-child-sexual-offending-behaviour-and-attitudes-among-Australian-men_web.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-s-jss2023",
        "title": "Jesuit Social Services 2023 Australian men study",
        "url": "https://cdn.jss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/20105310/Identifying-and-understanding-child-sexual-offending-behaviour-and-attitudes-among-Australian-men_web.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants",
      "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
      "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants",
        "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
        "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-s-paper",
      "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-s-paper",
        "title": "Levy and Robinson: Thoughts on Child Safety on Commodity Platforms",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09506",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-s-ec",
      "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
      "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-s-ec",
        "title": "European Commission: Children deserve protection and privacy",
        "url": "https://commissioners.ec.europa.eu/children-deserve-protection-and-privacy-2022-08-07_en",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-s-position",
      "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-s-position",
        "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-s-wp",
      "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-s-wp",
        "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-ref-s-drw",
      "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-ref-s-drw",
        "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-s-disclosure-log",
      "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-s-disclosure-log",
        "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
      "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
      "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
        "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
        "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-draft-s-csm-filings",
      "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
      "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-draft-s-csm-filings",
        "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
        "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-financial-index",
      "title": "ICMEC US annual reports and financial statements index",
      "url": "https://www.icmec.org/annual-report/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-financial-index",
        "title": "ICMEC US annual reports and financial statements index",
        "url": "https://www.icmec.org/annual-report/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-us9902023",
      "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
      "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-us9902023",
        "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
        "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-irs2023",
      "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
      "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-irs2023",
        "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
        "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-media-resolution",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-resolution",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=resolution&per_page=50",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-media-resolution",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-resolution",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=resolution&per_page=50",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-media-agm",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-agm",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=agm&per_page=50",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-media-agm",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-agm",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=agm&per_page=50",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-media-membership",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-membership",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=membership&per_page=50",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-media-membership",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-membership",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=membership&per_page=50",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-pages-agm",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: pages-agm",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/pages?search=annual%20general&per_page=50",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-pages-agm",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: pages-agm",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/pages?search=annual%20general&per_page=50",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-member-s-posts-agm",
      "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: posts-agm",
      "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/posts?search=annual%20general&per_page=50",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-member-s-posts-agm",
        "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: posts-agm",
        "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/posts?search=annual%20general&per_page=50",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-launch",
      "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
      "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-launch",
        "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
        "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-gtr",
      "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
      "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-gtr",
        "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
        "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-wp2",
      "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
      "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-wp2",
        "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
        "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-registration",
      "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
      "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-registration",
        "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
        "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-revisions",
      "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
      "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-revisions",
        "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
        "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-schema",
      "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
      "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-schema",
        "title": "OSF Preregistration schema version3",
        "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/schemas/registrations/5e795fc0d2833800195735d0/",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w6-award-s-methods",
      "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
      "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w6-award-s-methods",
        "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
        "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1",
        "notes": [
          "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-reddit",
      "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
      "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-reddit",
        "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
        "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-persona",
      "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
      "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-persona",
        "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
        "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-discord",
      "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
      "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-discord",
        "title": "Discord: Age Assurance for UK Users",
        "url": "https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/33362401287959-Age-Assurance-for-UK-Users",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-penalty",
      "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
      "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-penalty",
        "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
        "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-appeal",
      "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
      "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-appeal",
        "title": "ICO Reddit penalty announcement and appeal update",
        "url": "https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/02/reddit-issued-with-1447m-fine-for-children-s-privacy-failures/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-foi",
      "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
      "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-foi",
        "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
        "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-consultation",
      "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-consultation",
        "title": "Cabinet Office national digital-ID consultation, March 2026",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b2bd51c8010d37b34e008a/Making_public_services_work_for_you_with_your_digital_identity_2026.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-library",
      "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
      "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-library",
        "title": "Commons Library: Digital ID in the UK,4 September 2026",
        "url": "https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10369/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-impl-s-minister",
      "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-impl-s-minister",
        "title": "Ministerial answer on cancelled Digital ID expenditure,8 September 2026",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/20567",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted",
      "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted",
        "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-s12-current",
      "title": "Online Safety Act section 12: current official text",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/12",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-s12-current",
        "title": "Online Safety Act section 12: current official text",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/12",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-s81-current",
      "title": "Online Safety Act section 81: current official text",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/81",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-s81-current",
        "title": "Online Safety Act section 81: current official text",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/section/81",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
      "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
        "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-part3",
      "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-part3",
        "title": "Ofcom Part 3 guidance on highly effective age assurance",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/part-3-guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance.pdf?v=395680",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-part5",
      "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-part5",
        "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-child-code",
      "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-child-code",
        "title": "Issued Protection of Children Code for user-to-user services",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services.pdf?v=403579",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-children-decisions",
      "title": "Protecting children from harms online: Volume 4 final decisions",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-4-what-should-services-do-to-mitigate-the-risks-of-online-harms-to-children.pdf?v=403139",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-children-decisions",
        "title": "Protecting children from harms online: Volume 4 final decisions",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-4-what-should-services-do-to-mitigate-the-risks-of-online-harms-to-children.pdf?v=403139",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-report2026",
      "title": "Report on the use of age assurance under OSA section 157",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/age-assurance-report-2026/report-on-the-use-of-age-assurance.pdf?v=423162",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-report2026",
        "title": "Report on the use of age assurance under OSA section 157",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/age-assurance-report-2026/report-on-the-use-of-age-assurance.pdf?v=423162",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-current-page",
      "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-current-page",
        "title": "Ofcom age assurance duties: September 2026 update",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor",
      "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor",
        "title": "Vet your vendor: Ofcom due diligence resource",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/vet-your-vendor",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-foi2053425",
      "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-foi2053425",
        "title": "Ofcom FOI2053425: age verification, data protection and access rights",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2025/october/age-verification-data-protection-and-access-rights.pdf?v=406539",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-xgroovy",
      "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-xgroovy",
        "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-policy-s-dates",
      "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-policy-s-dates",
        "title": "Ofcom important dates for Online Safety compliance",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-avid-psc",
      "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-avid-psc",
        "title": "Companies House: AVID Certification Services Limited, persons with significant control",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14865982/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-scheme-psc",
      "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-scheme-psc",
        "title": "Companies House: Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd, persons with significant control",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11493870/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-governance",
      "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
      "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-governance",
        "title": "ACCS: Governance and legal operator disclosure",
        "url": "https://accscheme.com/governance/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-rules",
      "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
      "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-rules",
        "title": "ACCS0:2026 General Scheme Rules",
        "url": "https://accscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/ACCS-0-2026-General-Scheme-Rules.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-bsi-roles",
      "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
      "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-bsi-roles",
        "title": "BSI: Privacy Standards webinars,23 October 2025 Tony Allen biography",
        "url": "https://pages.bsigroup.com/l/35972/2025-09-15/3t96qh3",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-bsi-standard",
      "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
      "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-bsi-standard",
        "title": "BSI: Global framework for trustworthy age assurance",
        "url": "https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2026/february/global-framework-for-trustworthy-age-assurance-aims-to-help-create-safer-online-world-for-adolescents-and-children/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-iso-service",
      "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
      "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-iso-service",
        "title": "ACCS: ISO27566-1 Certification commercial service",
        "url": "https://accscheme.com/services/iso-27566-1-certification/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
      "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
      "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
        "title": "AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, version1.0",
        "url": "https://avpassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Specification-Version-1.0.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
      "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
      "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
        "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
        "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-avpa-project",
      "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
      "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-avpa-project",
        "title": "AVPA: euCONSENT project, current retrospective",
        "url": "https://avpassociation.com/euconsent/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-market-s-verifymy",
      "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
      "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-market-s-verifymy",
        "title": "VerifyMy: Email address age estimation and certification claims",
        "url": "https://verifymy.io/age-verification-and-estimation/email-address-age-estimation/",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-hansard0706",
      "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
      "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-hansard0706",
        "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
        "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-hansard0710",
      "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
      "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-hansard0710",
        "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
        "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-amend124",
      "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
      "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-amend124",
        "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
        "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-amend125",
      "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
      "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-amend125",
        "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
        "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5",
      "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5",
        "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024",
      "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024",
        "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025",
      "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025",
        "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144",
        "notes": [
          "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-ack",
      "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
      "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-ack",
        "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
        "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-launch",
      "title": "Global Call launch press release",
      "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-launch",
        "title": "Global Call launch press release",
        "url": "https://cdn.red-lines.ai/press-release-0.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-signatories",
      "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
      "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-signatories",
        "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
        "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-controlai",
      "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-controlai",
        "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
        "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-sprint",
      "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
      "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-sprint",
        "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
        "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1",
      "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
      "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1",
        "title": "Effektiv Spenden H1/2024 update",
        "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-in-h1-2024/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2",
      "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
      "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2",
        "title": "Effektiv Spenden H2/2024 update",
        "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/blog/unser-spendenfonds-zukunft-bewahren-und-ki-sicher-gestalten-in-h2-2024/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-eff-history",
      "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
      "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-eff-history",
        "title": "Effektiv Spenden fund history",
        "url": "https://effektiv-spenden.org/zukunft-bewahren/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-sff",
      "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
      "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-sff",
        "title": "SFF general-support recommendations",
        "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/recommendations",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup",
      "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
      "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup",
        "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
        "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-unesco-coordination",
      "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
      "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-unesco-coordination",
        "title": "UNESCO network coordination group",
        "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/291",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-unesco-network",
      "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
      "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-unesco-network",
        "title": "UNESCO civil-society network",
        "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/civil-society-organizations",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-athens",
      "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
      "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-athens",
        "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
        "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-athens-page",
      "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
      "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-athens-page",
        "title": "TFS Athens2025 recap announcement",
        "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/2025-athens-roundtable-report/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-survey",
      "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
      "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-survey",
        "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
        "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-ressa",
      "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
      "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-ressa",
        "title": "Maria Ressa UN-hosted prepared speech",
        "url": "https://estatements.un.org/estatements/10.0010/20250922090000000/hzbYlSo_YdpvP/kRYCEve-CYS_nyc_en.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-bengio",
      "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
      "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-bengio",
        "title": "UN automatic transcript of Security Council10005",
        "url": "https://transcripts.un.org/en/sc/10005",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-india",
      "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
      "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-india",
        "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
        "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-red-s-india-declaration",
      "title": "Government of India: New Delhi Declaration",
      "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2231208&lang=1&reg=3",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-red-s-india-declaration",
        "title": "Government of India: New Delhi Declaration",
        "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2231208&lang=1&reg=3",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-fathom",
      "title": "Fathom partnerships",
      "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-fathom",
        "title": "Fathom partnerships",
        "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-fathom-about",
      "title": "Fathom team and identity",
      "url": "https://fathom.org/about",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-fathom-about",
        "title": "Fathom team and identity",
        "url": "https://fathom.org/about",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-athens-participants",
      "title": "Athens seventh-edition participants",
      "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/seventh-edition-participants",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-athens-participants",
        "title": "Athens seventh-edition participants",
        "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/seventh-edition-participants",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-athens-history",
      "title": "Athens series history",
      "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-athens-history",
        "title": "Athens series history",
        "url": "https://www.aiathens.org/about",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-caif-event",
      "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
      "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-caif-event",
        "title": "CAIF Athens2025 recap",
        "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/facing-the-stakes-together-cooperative-ai-at-the-athens-roundtable-2025",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation",
      "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
      "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation",
        "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
        "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-caif-filings",
      "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-caif-filings",
        "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation filing history",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13485176/filing-history",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-deliberaide",
      "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
      "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-deliberaide",
        "title": "deliberAIde attributed TFS testimonial",
        "url": "https://www.deliberaide.com/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-longview-legal",
      "title": "Longview organizational structure",
      "url": "https://www.longview.org/organisational-structure/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-longview-legal",
        "title": "Longview organizational structure",
        "url": "https://www.longview.org/organisational-structure/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-finance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-sciencespo",
      "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
      "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-sciencespo",
        "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
        "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-cesia-report",
      "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
      "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-cesia-report",
        "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
        "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial",
      "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
      "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial",
        "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
        "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-elysee-priorities",
      "title": "French G7 priorities",
      "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/G7evian/2026/02/05/conference-de-presse-sur-les-priorites-des-filieres-finances-et-numerique-du-g7-2026",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-elysee-priorities",
        "title": "French G7 priorities",
        "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/G7evian/2026/02/05/conference-de-presse-sur-les-priorites-des-filieres-finances-et-numerique-du-g7-2026",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w8-follow-s-elysee-june",
      "title": "Macron G7 closing transcript",
      "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2026/06/17/g7-summit-in-evian-day-three",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w8-follow-s-elysee-june",
        "title": "Macron G7 closing transcript",
        "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2026/06/17/g7-summit-in-evian-day-three",
        "notes": [
          "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind",
      "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
      "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind",
        "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
        "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-caif",
      "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
      "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-caif",
        "title": "CAIF joint multi-agent funding announcement",
        "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/post/10m-funding-call-launched-with-schmidt-sciences-google-deepmind-and-aria",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
      "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
      "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
        "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
        "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-faq",
      "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
      "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-faq",
        "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
        "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-agenda",
      "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
      "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-fund-agenda",
        "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
        "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-schmidt-faq",
      "title": "Schmidt Sciences general FAQ",
      "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/faq/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-schmidt-faq",
        "title": "Schmidt Sciences general FAQ",
        "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/faq/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-google-principles",
      "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
      "url": "https://ai.google/principles/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-google-principles",
        "title": "Google AI Principles linked from funding FAQ",
        "url": "https://ai.google/principles/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-status",
      "title": "SB813 official status",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-status",
        "title": "SB813 official status",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled",
      "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled",
        "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary",
      "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
      "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary",
        "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
        "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-author",
      "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
      "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-author",
        "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
        "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-floor",
      "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-sb813-floor",
        "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-principles",
      "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
      "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-principles",
        "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
        "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders",
      "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
      "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders",
        "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
        "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy",
      "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
      "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy",
        "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
        "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-unicef",
      "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
      "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-unicef",
        "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
        "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-5rights",
      "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
      "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-5rights",
        "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
        "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-uk",
      "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-g7-uk",
        "title": "UK DSIT contemporaneous G7 agreement announcement",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g7-nations-agree-first-ever-joint-approach-to-protecting-children-online-and-drive-safe-ai-growth-that-delivers-for-all",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-fathom-approach",
      "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
      "url": "https://fathom.org/approach",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-fathom-approach",
        "title": "Fathom verification-market strategy",
        "url": "https://fathom.org/approach",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-paris-report",
      "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
      "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-paris-report",
        "title": "Paris public-private verification workshop simulation",
        "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/Bu0cvpqZYLObnDWhr9t3yIe3MRs.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w9-assure-s-ashby-report",
      "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
      "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w9-assure-s-ashby-report",
        "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
        "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-review",
      "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-review",
        "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-carnegie2022",
      "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
      "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-carnegie2022",
        "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
        "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-network68",
      "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-network68",
        "title": "Online Safety Act Network: statutory-review submission68 — June 2024",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-68-online-safety-act-network.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-joint-article",
      "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
      "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-joint-article",
        "title": "Farthing and Woods: The dangers of pluralisation —22April2024",
        "url": "https://thepolicymaker.appi.org.au/the-dangers-of-pluralisation-a-singular-duty-of-care-in-the-online-safety-act-2/",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-reset70",
      "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-reset70",
        "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-network-rename",
      "title": "Online Safety Network: new vision, new name —1September2026",
      "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/the-online-safety-network-new-vision-new-name/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-network-rename",
        "title": "Online Safety Network: new vision, new name —1September2026",
        "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/the-online-safety-network-new-vision-new-name/",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-draft",
      "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-draft",
        "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-existing-act",
      "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-existing-act",
        "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-publication",
      "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-publication",
        "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-announcement",
      "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
      "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-announcement",
        "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
        "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w10-duty-s-opd169",
      "title": "Senate outstanding orders: OPD169 duty-of-care preparation records",
      "url": "https://www.aph.gov.au/-/media/02_Parliamentary_Business/22_Chamber_Documents/221_Senate/Notice_Paper/Current_Notice_Paper/OPDs.pdf?hash=B52E85DFEBFCBD8E04405A2A98B1AD30CB3B330B&la=en",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w10-duty-s-opd169",
        "title": "Senate outstanding orders: OPD169 duty-of-care preparation records",
        "url": "https://www.aph.gov.au/-/media/02_Parliamentary_Business/22_Chamber_Documents/221_Senate/Notice_Paper/Current_Notice_Paper/OPDs.pdf?hash=B52E85DFEBFCBD8E04405A2A98B1AD30CB3B330B&la=en",
        "notes": [
          "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
      "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
      "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
        "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
        "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023",
      "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
      "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023",
        "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
        "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-un-advice",
      "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
      "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-un-advice",
        "title": "Carnegie: funded advice to UN minority-issues rapporteur —22November2021",
        "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/news/ad-hoc-advice-to-the-united-nations-special-rapporteur-on-minority-issues/",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-succession",
      "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
      "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-succession",
        "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
        "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-luminate-process",
      "title": "Luminate funding process",
      "url": "https://luminategroup.com/funding-process/en",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-luminate-process",
        "title": "Luminate funding process",
        "url": "https://luminategroup.com/funding-process/en",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-reset-disclosure",
      "title": "Reset.Tech Australia:2024 transparency report",
      "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/reset-tech-australia-transparency-report-2024-web.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-reset-disclosure",
        "title": "Reset.Tech Australia:2024 transparency report",
        "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/reset-tech-australia-transparency-report-2024-web.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners",
      "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
      "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners",
        "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
        "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide",
      "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
      "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide",
        "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
        "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-acf-report",
      "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
      "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-acf-report",
        "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
        "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-isf-award",
      "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
      "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-isf-award",
        "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
        "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-isf990",
      "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
      "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-isf990",
        "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
        "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions",
      "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
      "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions",
        "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
        "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-functioning-report",
      "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
      "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-functioning-report",
        "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
        "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-transparency-report",
      "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
      "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-transparency-report",
        "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
        "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-identity",
      "title": "McKinnon privacy policy —September2025",
      "url": "https://mckinnon.co/privacy-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-identity",
        "title": "McKinnon privacy policy —September2025",
        "url": "https://mckinnon.co/privacy-policy",
        "notes": [
          "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-osn-notice",
      "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
      "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-osn-notice",
        "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
        "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-overview",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-overview",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK Limited: official company overview",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-articles",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-articles",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-resolution",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-resolution",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-psc",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-psc",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-directors",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-directors",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-accounts",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-accounts",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-incorporation",
      "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-incorporation",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-psc04",
      "title": "Scott PSC04 filedApril2026: details-only change",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzUxNTIxNzkwOGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-psc04",
        "title": "Scott PSC04 filedApril2026: details-only change",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzUxNTIxNzkwOGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-model",
      "title": "Official guarantee-company model articles",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-guarantee/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-guarantee",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-uk-model",
        "title": "Official guarantee-company model articles",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-guarantee/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-guarantee",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-mann-granting",
      "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
      "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-mann-granting",
        "title": "Mannifera Granting Guide: historical staged decisions",
        "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Mannifera_Granting_Guide.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-acf-faq",
      "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
      "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-acf-faq",
        "title": "ACF FAQ: trustee and donor-advice powers",
        "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/philanthropic-services/faqs/",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-acf-template",
      "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
      "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-acf-template",
        "title": "ACF public sub-fund establishment template",
        "url": "https://www.communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/sub_fund_establishment_form.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-myer2024",
      "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
      "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-myer2024",
        "title": "The Myer Foundation:FY24 membership support and representation",
        "url": "https://uploads.prod01.sydney.platformos.com/instances/338/assets/documents/Publications/TMF%20Annual%20Report%20FY24.pdf?updated=1733198612",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-mann-round",
      "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
      "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-mann-round",
        "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
        "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-rights-first",
      "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
      "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-rights-first",
        "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
        "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-hrlc-launch",
      "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
      "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-hrlc-launch",
        "title": "HRLC launch of Rights-First",
        "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/rights-first/",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament",
      "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
      "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament",
        "title": "HRLC parliamentary-engagement update",
        "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/updates/2025-2-19-new-report-rights-first-principles-for-digital-platform-regulation/",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
      "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
      "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
        "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
        "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust-abr",
      "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
      "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust-abr",
        "title": "ABR: Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation",
        "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=28739100711",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-research-abr-history",
      "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
      "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-research-abr-history",
        "title": "ABR: Research Centre registered-name history",
        "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/AbnHistory/View?id=40656129127",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-research-abr-current",
      "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
      "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-research-abr-current",
        "title": "ABR: current name for research-entity identifier",
        "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=40656129127",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-charitable-abr",
      "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
      "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-charitable-abr",
        "title": "ABR: Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd",
        "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?id=12653756597",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust2024",
      "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
      "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust2024",
        "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
        "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-research2024",
      "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
      "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-research2024",
        "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
        "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable",
      "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
      "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable",
        "title": "Reset: Regulating for Transparency briefing —April2024",
        "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Regulating-for-Transparency-Reset.Tech.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-osan-feb",
      "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-osan-feb",
        "title": "OSAN illegal-harms response — February 2024",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/270826-consultation-protecting-people-from-illegal-content-online/responses/osa-network-1.pdf?v=385241",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-ofcom-inference",
      "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-ofcom-inference",
        "title": "Ofcom illegal-harms decision Volume3 —16 December2024",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/volume-3-transparency-trust-and-other-guidance.pdf?v=387709",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-ofcom-search",
      "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-ofcom-search",
        "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-woods-civil",
      "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
      "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-woods-civil",
        "title": "Lorna Woods: Ofcom illegal-content judgments guidance",
        "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/analysis/ofcom-s-illegal-content-judgements-guidance/",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-osan-july",
      "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-osan-july",
        "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk",
      "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk",
        "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-slsc-report",
      "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
      "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-slsc-report",
        "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
        "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-slsc-date",
      "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
      "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-slsc-date",
        "title": "SLSC25th Report publication metadata",
        "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12302.htm",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-hrlc155",
      "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-hrlc155",
        "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-au-response",
      "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-au-response",
        "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-rowland-speech",
      "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
      "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-rowland-speech",
        "title": "Rowland Sydney Institute speech —13 November2024",
        "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/speech/speech-sydney-institute-governance-digital-platforms",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-rowland-release",
      "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
      "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-rowland-release",
        "title": "Duty-of-care ministerial release —14 November2024",
        "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/rowland/media-release/new-duty-care-obligations-platforms-will-keep-australians-safer-online",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w13-disp-s-foi25247",
      "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w13-disp-s-foi25247",
        "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-original",
      "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
      "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-original",
        "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
        "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-landing",
      "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
      "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-landing",
        "title": "WEF typology publication landing —4August2023",
        "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/toolkit-for-digital-safety-design-interventions-and-innovations-typology-of-online-harms/",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-launch",
      "title": "WEF launch: common language for online harm",
      "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/all/common-language-online-harm-typology/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-launch",
        "title": "WEF launch: common language for online harm",
        "url": "https://www.weforum.org/stories/all/common-language-online-harm-typology/",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-resolver",
      "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
      "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-resolver",
        "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
        "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-hanna",
      "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
      "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-hanna",
        "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
        "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-explainer",
      "title": "WEF Douglas Broom typology explainer —1September2023",
      "url": "https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/09/definitions-online-harm-internet-safer/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-explainer",
        "title": "WEF Douglas Broom typology explainer —1September2023",
        "url": "https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/09/definitions-online-harm-internet-safer/",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-core-inaccessible",
      "title": "CO:RE4Cs research linked by Resolver —original uninspected",
      "url": "https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/71817/ssoar-2021-livingstone_et_al-The_4Cs_Classifying_Online_Risk.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-core-inaccessible",
        "title": "CO:RE4Cs research linked by Resolver —original uninspected",
        "url": "https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/71817/ssoar-2021-livingstone_et_al-The_4Cs_Classifying_Online_Risk.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-issues2024",
      "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
      "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-issues2024",
        "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
        "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance",
      "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance",
        "title": "eSafety Safety by Design: types of online harms",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/safety-by-design/foundations/how-platforms-can-be-misused-for-online-abuse",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-reset-green",
      "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
      "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-reset-green",
        "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
        "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w14-tax-s-act2021",
      "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w14-tax-s-act2021",
        "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html",
        "notes": [
          "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy",
      "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
      "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy",
        "title": "Crisp privacy policy: identities and operational roles",
        "url": "https://www.crispthinking.com/privacy-policy/",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc",
      "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc",
        "title": "Crisp Thinking Group Ltd05636614: registered control",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05636614/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc",
      "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc",
        "title": "Crisp Thinking(UK) Ltd06442193: registered share control",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06442193/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-acquisition",
      "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
      "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-crisp-acquisition",
        "title": "Kroll acquisition of Crisp announcement —31May2022",
        "url": "https://www.kroll.com/en/newsroom/kroll-acquires-crisp-trusted-provider-of-real-time-risk-intelligence",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-resolver-brand",
      "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
      "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-resolver-brand",
        "title": "Crisp joins Resolver brand —March2024",
        "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/crisp-joins-resolver-risk-intelligence/",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms",
      "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
      "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms",
        "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
        "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-illuminate",
      "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
      "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-illuminate",
        "title": "Resolver/Illuminate compliance collaboration —18March2026",
        "url": "https://www.resolver.com/about-us/news/resolver-illuminate-tech-trust-safety-compliance/",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-dsit-payment",
      "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-dsit-payment",
        "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-dsit-publisher",
      "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-dsit-publisher",
        "title": "DSIT2025 spending publication and update history",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dsit-spending-over-25000-in-2025",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-award-unavailable",
      "title": "ContractsFinder103528 notice — original inaccessible",
      "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/47f6e657-8370-4133-98df-ee2f2194144e",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-award-unavailable",
        "title": "ContractsFinder103528 notice — original inaccessible",
        "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/47f6e657-8370-4133-98df-ee2f2194144e",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-award-discovery",
      "title": "Secondary award listing103528 — discovery fields only",
      "url": "https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2023/W39/807534667",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-award-discovery",
        "title": "Secondary award listing103528 — discovery fields only",
        "url": "https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2023/W39/807534667",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure",
      "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
      "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure",
        "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
        "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy",
      "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
      "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy",
        "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
        "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy",
      "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy",
        "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-nsoit-oral",
      "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-nsoit-oral",
        "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-trusted-flagger",
      "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-trusted-flagger",
        "title": "Parliamentary answer HL3811 — 30 April 2024",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-04-15/HL3811/",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-minister-scope",
      "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-minister-scope",
        "title": "Parliamentary answer HL7610 — 3 June 2025",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-05-19/HL7610",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-remit-review",
      "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-remit-review",
        "title": "Parliamentary answer 9335 — 22 June 2026",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-06-12/9335",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-oversight-request",
      "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
      "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-oversight-request",
        "title": "Science and Technology Committee oversight recommendation — July2025",
        "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/441/report.html",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w15-impl-s-oversight-response",
      "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
      "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w15-impl-s-oversight-response",
        "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
        "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html",
        "notes": [
          "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-gsn-register",
      "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-gsn-register",
        "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc",
      "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc",
        "title": "GSN10433562: public control register",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-roles2026",
      "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-roles2026",
        "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-gsn-payment",
      "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-gsn-payment",
        "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-procurement2023",
      "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
      "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-procurement2023",
        "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
        "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-foi-release",
      "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-foi-release",
        "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle",
      "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle",
        "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-contract-links-unavailable",
      "title": "18November2025 parliamentary daily PDF — closed access",
      "url": "https://qna.files.parliament.uk/qnadailyreports/Written-Questions-Answers-Statements-Daily-Report-Commons-2025-11-18.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-contract-links-unavailable",
        "title": "18November2025 parliamentary daily PDF — closed access",
        "url": "https://qna.files.parliament.uk/qnadailyreports/Written-Questions-Answers-Statements-Daily-Report-Commons-2025-11-18.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w16-supp-s-later-faculty-unavailable",
      "title": "Later Faculty call-off attachment — unverified indexed cover",
      "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/1439ae7e-0b25-44f2-8280-1a9ed6c10620",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w16-supp-s-later-faculty-unavailable",
        "title": "Later Faculty call-off attachment — unverified indexed cover",
        "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/1439ae7e-0b25-44f2-8280-1a9ed6c10620",
        "notes": [
          "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-report2024",
      "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-report2024",
        "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-report2025",
      "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-report2025",
        "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-program",
      "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern programme and FAQ",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/lantern/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-program",
        "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern programme and FAQ",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/lantern/",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-pilot",
      "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-pilot",
        "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-expansion",
      "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-expansion",
        "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-block",
      "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
      "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-block",
        "title": "Block — Access and protection for teens in the digital economy",
        "url": "https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-bsr2023",
      "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
      "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-bsr2023",
        "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
        "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-hria-response",
      "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-hria-response",
        "title": "Tech Coalition — Responding to the Lantern HRIA",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/responding-to-hria/",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-standard",
      "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
      "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-standard",
        "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
        "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
      "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
      "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
        "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
        "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms",
      "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
      "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms",
        "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
        "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa",
      "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
      "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa",
        "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
        "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms",
      "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
      "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms",
        "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
        "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-guide-cited2025",
      "title": "Guide cited as 2025 by PUBLIC — historical version unverified",
      "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-guide-cited2025",
        "title": "Guide cited as 2025 by PUBLIC — historical version unverified",
        "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation",
        "notes": [
          "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4",
      "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4",
        "title": "PUBLIC for DSIT — Data Landscape Review 2024–2025, scoped case 4",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025/data-landscape-review-report-2024-to-2025",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-terms",
      "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
      "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-terms",
        "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
        "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-aup",
      "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
      "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-aup",
        "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
        "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-help",
      "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
      "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-help",
        "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
        "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
      "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
      "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
        "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
        "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-stipulation",
      "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
      "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-stipulation",
        "title": "Block — Stipulation consenting to CFPB order",
        "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-stipulation_2025-01.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-case",
      "title": "CFPB — Block enforcement case page",
      "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/enforcement/actions/block-inc/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-case",
        "title": "CFPB — Block enforcement case page",
        "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/enforcement/actions/block-inc/",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-docket",
      "title": "CFPB — Block administrative docket",
      "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/administrative-adjudication-proceedings/administrative-adjudication-docket/block-inc/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-docket",
        "title": "CFPB — Block administrative docket",
        "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/administrative-adjudication-proceedings/administrative-adjudication-docket/block-inc/",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-notice",
      "title": "CFPB — archived 16 January 2025 Block notice",
      "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/archive/newsroom/cfpb-orders-operator-of-cash-app-to-pay-175-million-and-fix-its-failures-on-fraud/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-cfpb-notice",
        "title": "CFPB — archived 16 January 2025 Block notice",
        "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/archive/newsroom/cfpb-orders-operator-of-cash-app-to-pay-175-million-and-fix-its-failures-on-fraud/",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-state-body",
      "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
      "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-state-body",
        "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
        "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-state-full",
      "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
      "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-state-full",
        "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
        "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-state-page",
      "title": "Maine — Block order landing and transcription",
      "url": "https://www.maine.gov/pfr/consumercredit/enforcement/enforcement_item.shtml?id=13145196",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-state-page",
        "title": "Maine — Block order landing and transcription",
        "url": "https://www.maine.gov/pfr/consumercredit/enforcement/enforcement_item.shtml?id=13145196",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-state-release",
      "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
      "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-state-release",
        "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
        "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-issuer2024",
      "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
      "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-issuer2024",
        "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
        "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-issuer2025",
      "title": "Block 2025 Form 10-K — scoped litigation disclosure",
      "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026012254/xyz-20251231.htm",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-issuer2025",
        "title": "Block 2025 Form 10-K — scoped litigation disclosure",
        "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026012254/xyz-20251231.htm",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2",
      "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
      "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2",
        "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
        "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-response",
      "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
      "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-response",
        "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
        "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-unverified-redress-site",
      "title": "Cash App CFPB redress site — official AG referral established",
      "url": "https://www.cashappcfpbsettlement.com/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-unverified-redress-site",
        "title": "Cash App CFPB redress site — official AG referral established",
        "url": "https://www.cashappcfpbsettlement.com/",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w23-cash-s-ag-referral",
      "title": "Oregon AG announcement — redress-site referral only",
      "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/media-home/news-media-releases/ag-rayfield-announces-45m-multistate-settlement-in-cash-app-investigation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w23-cash-s-ag-referral",
        "title": "Oregon AG announcement — redress-site referral only",
        "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/media-home/news-media-releases/ag-rayfield-announces-45m-multistate-settlement-in-cash-app-investigation/",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-july-notice",
      "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
      "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-july-notice",
        "title": "California AG — 8 July 2026 Block resolution announcement",
        "url": "https://www.oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/consumers-were-left-high-and-dry-attorney-general-bonta-secures-45-million",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
      "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
      "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
        "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
        "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-july-or",
      "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
      "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-july-or",
        "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
        "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-faq",
      "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-faq",
        "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-consolidated",
      "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-consolidated",
        "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-leadership",
      "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-leadership",
        "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-procedure",
      "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-procedure",
        "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-services",
      "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-services",
        "title": "NAAG member services — stated investigation and collaboration support",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-member-services/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-ccp",
      "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-ccp",
        "title": "NAAG Center for Consumer Protection — remit and complaint boundary",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/our-work/center-for-consumer-protection/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-vw-rules",
      "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-vw-rules",
        "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules",
      "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
      "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules",
        "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
        "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-gao",
      "title": "GAO-26-107956",
      "url": "https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-26-107956/index.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-gao",
        "title": "GAO-26-107956",
        "url": "https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-26-107956/index.html",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-foundation-return",
      "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
      "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-foundation-return",
        "title": "Mission Foundation Inc Form 990, tax year 2024",
        "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/300088843_202412_990_2026030223963502.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship",
      "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
      "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship",
        "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
        "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-letters",
      "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
      "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-letters",
        "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
        "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w24-ag-s-idaho",
      "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
      "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w24-ag-s-idaho",
        "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
        "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/",
        "notes": [
          "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-code",
      "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86.",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-code",
        "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86.",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-chapter",
      "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-chapter",
        "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-history",
      "title": "AB 621 — official procedural history",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-history",
        "title": "AB 621 — official procedural history",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-version-changes"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-march-analysis",
      "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
      "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-march-analysis",
        "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
        "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
      "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
      "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
        "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
        "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-wired",
      "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
      "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-wired",
        "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
        "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-official-news",
      "title": "SF City Attorney news — bounded publication recovery",
      "url": "https://www.sf.gov/cityattorney/news",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-official-news",
        "title": "SF City Attorney news — bounded publication recovery",
        "url": "https://www.sf.gov/cityattorney/news",
        "notes": [
          "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-june-announcement",
      "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
      "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-june-announcement",
        "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
        "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment",
      "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
      "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment",
        "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
        "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-tilak",
      "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
      "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-tilak",
        "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
        "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-foi-log",
      "title": "eSafety disclosure Log 141 — correspondence release",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-foi-log",
        "title": "eSafety disclosure Log 141 — correspondence release",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-foi141",
      "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-foi141",
        "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-dis-standard",
      "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-dis-standard",
        "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-res-standard",
      "title": "RES Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — companion clock",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00711/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-res-standard",
        "title": "RES Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — companion clock",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00711/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-bose-amendment",
      "title": "BOSE Amendment Determination 2024 — different May clock",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00590/asmade/2024-05-30/text/original/pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-bose-amendment",
        "title": "BOSE Amendment Determination 2024 — different May clock",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00590/asmade/2024-05-30/text/original/pdf",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-deepfake-act",
      "title": "Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2024A00078/asmade/2024-09-02/text/original/pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-deepfake-act",
        "title": "Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2024A00078/asmade/2024-09-02/text/original/pdf",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-esafety-september",
      "title": "eSafety — unnamed UK provider formal warning",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-moves-against-services-used-to-nudify-australian-school-children",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-esafety-september",
        "title": "eSafety — unnamed UK provider formal warning",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-moves-against-services-used-to-nudify-australian-school-children",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-esafety-november",
      "title": "eSafety — reported withdrawal of three unnamed services",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-action-prevents-services-nudifying-australian-school-children",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-esafety-november",
        "title": "eSafety — reported withdrawal of three unnamed services",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-action-prevents-services-nudifying-australian-school-children",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-esafety-may",
      "title": "eSafety — unnamed Argentina-based provider direction",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-takes-action-against-another-major-nudify-service-for-failing-to-protect-australian-children",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-esafety-may",
        "title": "eSafety — unnamed Argentina-based provider direction",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-takes-action-against-another-major-nudify-service-for-failing-to-protect-australian-children",
        "notes": [
          "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-excluded-version",
      "title": "Excluded historical-version attempt — chaptered bytes returned",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621&version=20250AB62199INT",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-excluded-version",
        "title": "Excluded historical-version attempt — chaptered bytes returned",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621&version=20250AB62199INT",
        "notes": [
          "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-version-changes"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w25-sf-s-court-gateway",
      "title": "SF Court Case Query — human-verification boundary",
      "url": "https://webapps.sftc.org/captcha/captcha.dll?referrer=https://webapps.sftc.org/ci/CaseInfo.dll?",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w25-sf-s-court-gateway",
        "title": "SF Court Case Query — human-verification boundary",
        "url": "https://webapps.sftc.org/captcha/captcha.dll?referrer=https://webapps.sftc.org/ci/CaseInfo.dll?",
        "notes": [
          "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-filings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-about",
      "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-about",
        "title": "TAT — implementer, governance and funding",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/about",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ohf-company",
      "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ohf-company",
        "title": "Online Harms Foundation — company 11656320",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ohf-control",
      "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ohf-control",
        "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
      "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
        "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-verification",
      "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
      "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-verification",
        "title": "TCAP — public verification-policy summary",
        "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/content-classification-and-verification",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-inclusion",
      "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
      "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-inclusion",
        "title": "TCAP — tiered inclusion policy",
        "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/inclusion-policy",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-designation",
      "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
      "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-designation",
        "title": "TCAP — designation, imitation and delisting policy",
        "url": "https://www.terrorismanalytics.org/policies/designation",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022",
      "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022",
        "title": "TCAP — Year 2 transparency report",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/hubfs/Tech-Against-Terrorism-TCAP-Transparency-Report-2021-2022.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-company",
      "title": "QuantSpark Limited — company 10304694",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-company",
        "title": "QuantSpark Limited — company 10304694",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-control",
      "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-control",
        "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-officers",
      "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-officers",
        "title": "QuantSpark — current director record",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/officers",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025",
      "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025",
        "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-leadership",
      "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
      "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-qs-leadership",
        "title": "QuantSpark — founder and shared TAT leadership statement",
        "url": "https://quantspark.ai/insights/quantspark-turning-ai-ambition-into-operational-reality-for-private-equity",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
      "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
      "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
        "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
        "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
      "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
      "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
        "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
        "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
      "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
      "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
        "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
        "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026",
      "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
      "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026",
        "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
        "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema",
      "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
      "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema",
        "title": "Canada grants disclosure — relevant field definitions",
        "url": "https://open.canada.ca/data/recombinant-published-schema/grants.json",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024",
      "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024",
        "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026",
      "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
      "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID=",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026",
        "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
        "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID=",
        "notes": [
          "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance",
      "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance",
        "title": "GIFCT — current Operating Board and advisory structure",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/governance/",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
      "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
        "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-explainers",
      "title": "GIFCT — institutional and financing self-description",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/explainers/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-explainers",
        "title": "GIFCT — institutional and financing self-description",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/explainers/",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
      "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
        "title": "GIFCT — hash-sharing database and platform discretion",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/hsdb",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025",
      "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025",
        "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022",
      "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022",
        "title": "GIFCT — HSDB Taxonomy v1.0, December 2022",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/HSDB-Taxonomy-FOR-PUBLICATION-Dec-2022-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft",
      "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft",
        "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022",
      "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022",
        "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022",
      "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022",
        "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021",
      "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
      "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021",
        "title": "BSR — GIFCT human-rights impact assessment (2021)",
        "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-GIFCT-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-response2021",
      "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-response2021",
        "title": "GIFCT — response to BSR assessment",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/2021/07/20/hria-response-letter-by-nick-rasmussen/",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-policy2026",
      "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-policy2026",
        "title": "GIFCT — human-rights policy updated May 2026",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-HumanRightsPolicy-13.12Update.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-update2026",
      "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
      "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-update2026",
        "title": "GIFCT — announced human-rights follow-through",
        "url": "https://gifct.org/2026/05/18/updates-to-our-human-rights-policy/",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples",
      "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples",
        "title": "DIS Standard — further scoped reading of verification examples",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf",
        "notes": [
          "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023",
      "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
      "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023",
        "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
        "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
      "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
      "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
        "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
        "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-results2019",
      "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
      "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-ca-results2019",
        "title": "Public Safety Canada — reported 2019–20 agreement execution",
        "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/dprtmntl-rslts-rprt-2019-20/index-en.aspx",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023",
      "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023",
        "title": "TAT — 2023 review of reported delivery",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2023",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024",
      "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024",
        "title": "TAT — 2024 archive, classification and workflow account",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/review2024",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-review2025",
      "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
      "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tat-review2025",
        "title": "TAT — December 2025 operational update",
        "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/december-2025-update-tech-against-terrorism-ytpec",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-product",
      "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-product",
        "title": "TCAP — current Archive research product",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tcap-adrp",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api",
      "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
      "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api",
        "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
        "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback",
      "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
      "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback",
        "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
        "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-auth",
      "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
      "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-auth",
        "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
        "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-policy-shell",
      "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
      "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-archive-policy-shell",
        "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
        "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-tfp-product",
      "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-tfp-product",
        "title": "TAT — Trusted Flagger product interface",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/tfp",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
      "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
        "title": "Altitude — TAT stewardship and Jigsaw support announcement",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/news/altitude-an-open-source-tool",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-product",
      "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
      "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-product",
        "title": "Altitude — current product and source-repository link",
        "url": "https://techagainstterrorism.org/altitude",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-license",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-license",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — license",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/LICENSE",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-contribution",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-contribution",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — contribution",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/CONTRIBUTING.md",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — faq",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/docs/faq.md",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-priority",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-priority",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — priority",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/prioritization/case_priority.py",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — review",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/review.py",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-import-config",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-import-config",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer",
      "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer",
        "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py",
        "notes": [
          "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
      "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
      "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
        "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
        "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition",
      "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
      "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition",
        "title": "MFAT — retrospective support-function transition",
        "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/About-us-Corporate/MFAT-corporate-publications/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24/MFAT-Annual-Report-2023-24.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-mfat-costs",
      "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
      "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-mfat-costs",
        "title": "MFAT OIA 29223 — department-only Call expenditure",
        "url": "https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/OIA/OIA-2024/OIA-29223-Chrischurch-call-budgets-and-expenditure-4-April-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-packard2024",
      "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
      "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-packard2024",
        "title": "Packard — CCF 2024 general-support grant card",
        "url": "https://www.packard.org/grantee/the-christchurch-call-foundation/",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-carnegie2024",
      "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
      "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-carnegie2024",
        "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — CCF launch grant",
        "url": "https://carnegie.org/grants/grants-database/page/13/",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-carnegie2026",
      "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
      "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-carnegie2026",
        "title": "Carnegie Corporation NY — March 2026 board approvals",
        "url": "https://carnegie.org/article/carnegie-corporation-of-new-york-board-approves-50-grants-totaling-44275000/",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-canada26007",
      "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
      "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-canada26007",
        "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
        "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-proposal2023",
      "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-proposal2023",
        "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-join-call",
      "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-join-call",
        "title": "Join the Call — published entry procedure",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/join-the-call/",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor",
      "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
      "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor",
        "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
        "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-foundation",
      "title": "CCF — current institutional self-description",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/the-foundation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-foundation",
        "title": "CCF — current institutional self-description",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/the-foundation",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-funding",
      "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-funding",
        "title": "CCF — financial and other partnership self-description",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/funding",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-call-priorities",
      "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-call-priorities",
        "title": "Call — current priorities and programme direction",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/priorities-and-programmes",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-privacy",
      "title": "ROOST — legal identity in website privacy statement",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/privacy-policy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-privacy",
        "title": "ROOST — legal identity in website privacy statement",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/privacy-policy/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-columbia-incubation",
      "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
      "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-columbia-incubation",
        "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
        "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-careers",
      "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/careers",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-careers",
        "title": "ROOST Careers — observed job-link parent",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/careers",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-global-impact-employment",
      "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
      "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-global-impact-employment",
        "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
        "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
      "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
      "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
        "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
        "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025",
      "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025",
        "title": "ROOST — evolving governance explanation",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/open-by-design-roost-s-approach-to-safety-tool-development/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
      "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
        "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025",
      "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025",
        "title": "ROOST — inaugural-board announcement",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-welcomes-inaugural-board-of-directors-to-guide-mission-and-long-term-governance/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-launch",
      "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
      "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-launch",
        "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
        "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
      "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
        "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-100days",
      "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roost-100days",
        "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025",
      "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025",
        "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-elevate",
      "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
      "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-elevate",
        "title": "CCF Elevate — current programme statement",
        "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/programmes/elevate",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-roost-reprint",
      "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-roost-reprint",
        "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roadmap",
      "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
      "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roadmap",
        "title": "ROOST public roadmap",
        "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roadmap.html",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-roadmap2025",
      "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-roadmap2025",
        "title": "ROOST public-roadmap announcement",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/introducing-roost-s-roadmap-inaugural-technical-design-committee/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-pin",
      "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
      "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-pin",
        "title": "RMC inspected commit metadata",
        "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits/main",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
      "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
        "title": "RMC README — partner policy packs",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/README.md",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby",
      "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby",
        "title": "RMC root licence — CC BY 4.0",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/LICENSE",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
      "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
        "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
      "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
        "title": "CCF template Annex 1 — comparative policy context",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%201%20-%20defining%20terrorism%20and%20violent%20extremism.md",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2",
      "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2",
        "title": "CCF template Annex 2 — contextual actor approach",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/annex%202%20-%20terrorist%20and%20violent%20extremist%20actors.md",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation",
      "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation",
        "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-relocation",
      "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
      "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-relocation",
        "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
        "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-prior-path",
      "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
      "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tvec-prior-path",
        "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
        "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5",
        "notes": [
          "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
      "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
      "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
        "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
        "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026",
      "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
      "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026",
        "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
        "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case",
      "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
      "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case",
        "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
        "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025",
      "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
      "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025",
        "title": "ROOST July 2025 — donated tools and planned adoption",
        "url": "https://discord.com/press-releases/roost-announces-coop-and-osprey-free-open-source-trust-and-safety-infrastructure-for-the-ai-era",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide",
      "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide",
        "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-pin",
      "title": "Phoebe inspected commit metadata",
      "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/haileyok/phoebe/commits/HEAD",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-pin",
        "title": "Phoebe inspected commit metadata",
        "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/haileyok/phoebe/commits/HEAD",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme",
      "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme",
        "title": "Phoebe README — investigation prototype",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/README.md",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-prompt",
      "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-prompt",
        "title": "Phoebe agent instructions",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/agent/prompt.py",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey",
      "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey",
        "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-ozone",
      "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-ozone",
        "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-tools",
      "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-tools",
        "title": "Phoebe exposed Osprey tool definitions",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/tools/definitions/osprey.py",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-config",
      "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-config",
        "title": "Phoebe model, endpoint and repository configuration",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/config.py",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit",
      "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit",
        "title": "Phoebe MIT software licence",
        "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/LICENSE",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-current",
      "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-current",
        "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms",
      "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms",
        "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate",
      "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate",
        "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-launch2024",
      "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-launch2024",
        "title": "Tech Coalition launches Pathways",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/announcing-pathways/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-year2025",
      "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-pathways-year2025",
        "title": "Pathways 2025 annual delivery account",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/2025-year-in-review/",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026",
      "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
      "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026",
        "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
        "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-stability-earlier-email",
      "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
      "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-stability-earlier-email",
        "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
        "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-register-attempt",
      "title": "CCF official registry entry attempt — content not acquired",
      "url": "https://register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/ViewCharity?accountId=CC62350",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-register-attempt",
        "title": "CCF official registry entry attempt — content not acquired",
        "url": "https://register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/ViewCharity?accountId=CC62350",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-legal-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-odata-attempt",
      "title": "CCF official open-data query — no entity record acquired",
      "url": "https://www.odata.charities.govt.nz/Organisations",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w27-roost-s-ccf-odata-attempt",
        "title": "CCF official open-data query — no entity record acquired",
        "url": "https://www.odata.charities.govt.nz/Organisations",
        "notes": [
          "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-legal-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms",
      "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
      "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms",
        "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
        "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ms-faq",
      "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
      "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ms-faq",
        "title": "PhotoDNA FAQ — Cloud/on-premise distinction",
        "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/faq",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ms-photodna",
      "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
      "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ms-photodna",
        "title": "PhotoDNA — technology and qualification description",
        "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ms-licensees2012",
      "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
      "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ms-licensees2012",
        "title": "Microsoft — named 2012 PhotoDNA licensees",
        "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2012/03/19/microsoft-photodna-technology-to-help-law-enforcement-fight-child-pornography/",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-tc-annual2023",
      "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-tc-annual2023",
        "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024",
      "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024",
        "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025",
      "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
      "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025",
        "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
        "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-api",
      "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
      "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-api",
        "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
        "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-usage",
      "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
      "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-usage",
        "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
        "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit",
      "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit",
        "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-donation",
      "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-donation",
        "title": "NCMEC — donated audit and correction account",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2024/helping-child-survivors-fight-to-remove-sex-abuse-images",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-provider",
      "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-ncmec-provider",
        "title": "NCMEC CyberTipline data — hashing and provider notices",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata",
        "notes": [
          "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-faq",
      "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-faq",
        "title": "StopNCII public-user FAQ",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/faq/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-privacy",
      "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-privacy",
        "title": "StopNCII privacy notice — January2026",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/privacy-policy/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-how",
      "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-how",
        "title": "StopNCII — six-step public workflow",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/how-it-works/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-join",
      "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-join",
        "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-programme",
      "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-programme",
        "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
      "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
        "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms",
      "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms",
        "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy",
      "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
      "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy",
        "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
        "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-approved-fees",
      "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-approved-fees",
        "title": "Approved Participant annual fee diagram",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-fees-landing-page-l.jpg?_=1785755178",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-programme-fees",
      "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-programme-fees",
        "title": "Programme Partner annual fee diagram",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/partner-fees-l.jpg?_=1785755403",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-approved-onboarding",
      "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-approved-onboarding",
        "title": "Approved Participant onboarding diagram",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/approved-participant-onboarding2-l.jpg?_=1785754935",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-programme-onboarding",
      "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
      "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-programme-onboarding",
        "title": "Programme Partner onboarding diagram",
        "url": "https://stopncii.org/assets/images/finalppo-l.jpg?_=1785755857",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-api",
      "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
      "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-api",
        "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
        "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-stop-photodna2024",
      "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
      "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-stop-photodna2024",
        "title": "SWGfL — PhotoDNA integration and Niantic announcement",
        "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/magazine/stopncii-announces-photodna-integration-and-niantic-as-new-industry-partner/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-bing2024",
      "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
      "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-bing2024",
        "title": "Microsoft — StopNCII Bing pilot",
        "url": "https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/09/05/an-update-on-our-approach-to-tackling-intimate-image-abuse/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-google-stop2025",
      "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
      "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-google-stop2025",
        "title": "Google — intended StopNCII rollout",
        "url": "https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/stopncii-program-partnership/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-snap-esafety",
      "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
      "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-snap-esafety",
        "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
        "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-fsc-adoption",
      "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
      "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-fsc-adoption",
        "title": "Free Speech Coalition — StopNCII adoption argument",
        "url": "https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/integrating-stopnciiorg-into-your-platform",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
      "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
        "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles",
      "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles",
        "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-about",
      "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
      "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-about",
        "title": "SWGfL — service and trustee roles",
        "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-ch-history",
      "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-swgfl-ch-history",
        "title": "SWGfL filing history — director appointment dates",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history",
        "notes": [
          "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-governance",
      "title": "Nominet corporate governance and legal identity",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/corporate-governance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-governance",
        "title": "Nominet corporate governance and legal identity",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/corporate-governance/",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020",
      "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020",
        "title": "Nominet Articles amended 22 September 2020",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-UK-Articles-of-Association-2020.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-memorandum",
      "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-memorandum",
        "title": "Nominet memorandum: objects and member non-distribution",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/memorandum_of_association.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-voting2012",
      "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-voting2012",
        "title": "Nominet current-linked dated voting by-law",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/58367_votingrightspolicy17052012.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025",
      "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025",
        "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2026-unacquired",
      "title": "Nominet FY2026 report — content unacquired",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Annual-Report-and-Financial-Statements-2026.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2026-unacquired",
        "title": "Nominet FY2026 report — content unacquired",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Annual-Report-and-Financial-Statements-2026.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021",
      "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021",
        "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-sid2022",
      "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-sid2022",
        "title": "Nominet separate Safer Internet Day 2022 commitment",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/safer-internet-day-organisers-and-supporters-targeting-record-year/",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-summary2024",
      "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
      "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-summary2024",
        "title": "Nominet FY2024 summary grant table",
        "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Summary-Report-2024.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025",
      "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
      "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025",
        "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
        "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-sid-research2026",
      "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-sid-research2026",
        "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022",
      "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022",
        "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025",
      "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025",
        "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-childnet-identity",
      "title": "Childnet Companies House legal identity",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-childnet-identity",
        "title": "Childnet Companies House legal identity",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025",
      "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025",
        "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-cpp2026",
      "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-cpp2026",
        "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-terms2024",
      "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-terms2024",
        "title": "Nominet registrant terms, 20 March 2024",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Terms-and-conditions-of-domain-name-registration.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-iwf2013",
      "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
      "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-iwf2013",
        "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
        "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-formal2014",
      "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-formal2014",
        "title": "Nominet formalisation and review routes, 3 April 2014",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/nominet-formalises-approach-to-tackling-criminal-activity-on-uk-domains/",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-statutory-account2026",
      "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-statutory-account2026",
        "title": "Nominet account of forthcoming statutory domain powers, 16 July 2026",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/blog/uk-crime-and-policing-act/",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-action2020",
      "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
      "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-action2020",
        "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2019–October 2020",
        "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-Online-Criminal-Activity-2020.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-action2023",
      "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
      "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-action2023",
        "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
        "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions",
      "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
      "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions",
        "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
        "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-ipo-accounts2026",
      "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-ipo-accounts2026",
        "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-police-budget2025",
      "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
      "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-police-budget2025",
        "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
        "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-police-forecast2018",
      "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
      "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-police-forecast2018",
        "title": "City of London Police draft financial plan, 24 May 2018",
        "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s95925/MTFP%20Update.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-funding2026",
      "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-funding2026",
        "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-funding2014",
      "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-funding2014",
        "title": "Government funding and PIPCU secondment account, 23 October 2014",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-government-cash-boost-to-tackle-digital-piracy-and-fake-goods",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020",
      "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
      "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020",
        "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
        "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-gateway2025",
      "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-gateway2025",
        "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-delivery2019",
      "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-delivery2019",
        "title": "IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 — attributed Ashiko delivery",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-strategy2022",
      "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-strategy2022",
        "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-referral-guide",
      "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
      "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-referral-guide",
        "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
        "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023",
      "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023",
        "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026",
      "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
      "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026",
        "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
        "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-about",
      "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
      "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-about",
        "title": "Alliance for Intellectual Property — coalition identity",
        "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/about-the-alliance",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-online",
      "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
      "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-online",
        "title": "Alliance Online Accountability — current-captured KYBC advocacy",
        "url": "https://www.allianceforip.co.uk/onlineaccountability",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-funding-answer2026",
      "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-funding-answer2026",
        "title": "Written answer119446, PIPCU funding through 2029",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-10/119446",
        "notes": [
          "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020",
      "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020",
        "title": "Alliance response to CMA Digital Markets Taskforce, internal August2020",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0962d3bf7f5d06b02b13/Response_to_CFI_-_AIP.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020",
      "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020",
        "title": "BPI response to CMA, redacted version November2020",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fce0af6d3bf7f5d053c6bc4/Response_to_CFI_-_BPI_.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
      "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
        "title": "CMA Taskforce response publication record",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/digital-markets-taskforce",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-osb2021",
      "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-alliance-osb2021",
        "title": "Alliance OSB0016 parliamentary evidence, internal September2021",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/39026/pdf/",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068",
      "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068",
        "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-rusi2021",
      "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
      "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-rusi2021",
        "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
        "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-music-response2021",
      "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-music-response2021",
        "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-sector-vision2023",
      "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-sector-vision2023",
        "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023",
      "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023",
        "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026",
      "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026",
        "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026",
      "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026",
        "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-creative-guidance",
      "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
      "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-creative-guidance",
        "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
        "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-creative-report2019",
      "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-creative-report2019",
        "title": "IP Crime Report 2018/19: Creative and PRS contribution scopes",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5db6a44940f0b6379cde8345/IP-Crime-Report-2019.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-creative-portal",
      "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
      "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-creative-portal",
        "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
        "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-creative-metric",
      "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
      "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-creative-metric",
        "title": "Police announcement of White Bullet advertising estimates",
        "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news/city-of-london/news/2023/january/operation-creative-blocks-6-million-of-uk-advertising-revenue-from-funding-illegal-websites/",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iab-guide",
      "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
      "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iab-guide",
        "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
        "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-gambling-condition",
      "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
      "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-gambling-condition",
        "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
        "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-gambling2017",
      "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
      "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-gambling2017",
        "title": "Gambling Commission: Operation Creative and licence condition",
        "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/joint-operation-results-in-reduction-of-gambling-adverts-placed-on-illegal",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-thinkbox2018",
      "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-thinkbox2018",
        "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018",
      "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
      "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018",
        "title": "White Bullet: separate official-list index and proprietary risk offering",
        "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-signs-eu-commission-s-mou-on-online-advertising-and-ipr-launches-free-global-piracy-index-to-assist-signatory-compliance",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-whitebullet-wipo",
      "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
      "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-whitebullet-wipo",
        "title": "White Bullet WIPO ALERT membership and combined offering account",
        "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-world-intellectual-property-organisation-wipo-to-help-prevent-piracy",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-whitebullet-peer",
      "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
      "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-whitebullet-peer",
        "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
        "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-peer39",
      "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
      "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-peer39",
        "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
        "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-index",
      "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-index",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT public description",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/index",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-faq",
      "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-faq",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-procedures",
      "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-procedures",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT contributor procedures: Brazil and Japan scopes",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/operating-procedures",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo2019",
      "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo2019",
        "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
      "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
        "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-pay-activities",
      "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-pay-activities",
        "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy",
      "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
      "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy",
        "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
        "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-paypal-uk",
      "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
      "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-paypal-uk",
        "title": "PayPal UK Infringement Report Policy",
        "url": "https://www.paypal.com/uk/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-paypal-us",
      "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
      "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-paypal-us",
        "title": "PayPal US Infringement Report Policy",
        "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/infringementrpt-full?locale.x=en_US",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-budget",
      "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-budget",
        "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-recap",
      "title": "ACE18 recap: June update published August2026",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/respect-for-ip/w/ace/18-highlights-global-cooperation-and-innovation-in-ip-enforcement",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-recap",
        "title": "ACE18 recap: June update published August2026",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/respect-for-ip/w/ace/18-highlights-global-cooperation-and-innovation-in-ip-enforcement",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-approval",
      "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-approval",
        "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-spend",
      "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
      "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-wipo-spend",
        "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
        "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-match-rules",
      "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
      "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-match-rules",
        "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
        "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-stripe-match",
      "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
      "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-stripe-match",
        "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
        "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-match-privacy",
      "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
      "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-match-privacy",
        "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
        "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-egumball2023",
      "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
      "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-egumball2023",
        "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
        "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1",
        "notes": [
          "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-egumball2025",
      "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
      "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-egumball2025",
        "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
        "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b",
        "notes": [
          "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion",
      "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
      "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion",
        "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
        "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus",
      "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
      "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus",
        "title": "Filed MPAA and other media amici brief supporting DoubleVerify",
        "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/6-s244157-ac-motion-picture-assn-america-et-al-060618.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-filmon-appellant",
      "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
      "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-filmon-appellant",
        "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
        "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-product",
      "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-product",
        "title": "DoubleVerify brand suitability product description",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/products/advertisers/verify/brand-suitability",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-review",
      "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-review",
        "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-url",
      "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-url",
        "title": "DoubleVerify URL-level transparency announcement",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverify-expands-access-to-open-web-url-level-transparency",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-defaults",
      "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-defaults",
        "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-10k",
      "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
      "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-10k",
        "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings FY2025 Form10-K: configuration and revenue scope",
        "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819928/000110465926020499/dv-20251231x10k.htm",
        "notes": [
          "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec2021",
      "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec2021",
        "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec2022",
      "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec2022",
        "title": "2022 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2022-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
      "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
        "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive",
      "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive",
        "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec-incoming",
      "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
      "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-ncmec-incoming",
        "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
        "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-progress",
      "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-progress",
        "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-response",
      "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-response",
        "title": "DoubleVerify February7 response to Adalytics criticism",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/statement-on-adalytics-report?hs_amp=true",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-partnership",
      "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-partnership",
        "title": "IWF May2025 DoubleVerify partnership announcement",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/power-partnership-boosts-fight-to-stop-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-online",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic",
      "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic",
        "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/",
        "notes": [
          "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-senate-release",
      "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
      "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-senate-release",
        "title": "Blackburn/Blumenthal inquiry announcement",
        "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/2/issues/technology/blackburn-blumenthal-probe-amazon-google-after-new-report-reveals-they-placed-ads-on-website-that-hosts-child-sexual-abuse-material",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-cma-advocacy",
      "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
      "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-cma-advocacy",
        "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
        "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
      "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
      "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
        "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
        "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
      "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
      "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
        "title": "Senators letter to Media Rating Council",
        "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/D8F037E4-B312-4DD9-8756-8390BC386854",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-senate-tag",
      "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
      "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-senate-tag",
        "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
        "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-tag-report",
      "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
      "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-tag-report",
        "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
        "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-tag-release",
      "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
      "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-tag-release",
        "title": "TAG February2026 report announcement: claimed no BSC violations",
        "url": "https://www.tagtoday.net/pressreleases/2025-tag-analysis-shows-ad-industry-progress-in-fighting-fraud-sharing-threats-and-improving-transparency",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-directory",
      "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-directory",
        "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-fees",
      "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-fees",
        "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-benefits",
      "title": "IWF membership benefits",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-benefits",
        "title": "IWF membership benefits",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/benefits-of-membership/",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
      "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
        "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts",
      "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
      "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts",
        "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
        "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-preservation-letter",
      "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
      "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-preservation-letter",
        "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
        "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-rebuttal",
      "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
      "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-rebuttal",
        "title": "DoubleVerify April7 rebuttal to Adalytics GIVT report",
        "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/web/verify/doubleverifys-response-to-adalytics-march-28-givt-report?hs_amp=true",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-dv-complaint",
      "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
      "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-dv-complaint",
        "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
        "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w30-class-s-cma-response",
      "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
      "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w30-class-s-cma-response",
        "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
        "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/",
        "notes": [
          "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-cma2024",
      "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
      "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-cma2024",
        "title": "Check My Ads 2024 annual report — funding mix and historical board",
        "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cma-annual-report-250226.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-democracy2024",
      "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
      "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-democracy2024",
        "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
        "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-democracy2023",
      "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
      "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-democracy2023",
        "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
        "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-ford2022",
      "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
      "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-ford2022",
        "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
        "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-ford2025",
      "title": "Ford Foundation March 2025 indexed grant lead",
      "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/?locations=918&order=asc&orderby=date&page=162",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-ford2025",
        "title": "Ford Foundation March 2025 indexed grant lead",
        "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/?locations=918&order=asc&orderby=date&page=162",
        "notes": [
          "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-kr2023",
      "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
      "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-kr2023",
        "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
        "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-kr2023list",
      "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
      "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-kr2023list",
        "title": "KR Foundation public 2023 grant list",
        "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2023-List-of-grants.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-kr2025list",
      "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
      "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-kr2025list",
        "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
        "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-krstatutes",
      "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
      "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-krstatutes",
        "title": "KR Foundation statutes — grant and appointment authority",
        "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/KR-Foundation-Statutes.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-cma2025",
      "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
      "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-cma2025",
        "title": "Check My Ads 2025 annual report — scoped funding and policy activity",
        "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-cmasub",
      "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-cmasub",
        "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158",
        "notes": [
          "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-crisis",
      "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-crisis",
        "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-roadmap",
      "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-roadmap",
        "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-statusindex",
      "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-statusindex",
        "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-nciinews",
      "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-nciinews",
        "title": "Ofcom NCII news — September2026 supplier/measure statement",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/ofcom-to-crack-down-on-spread-of-illegal-intimate-images-and-deepfakes-boosting-protections-for-women-and-girls-online",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-nciistatus",
      "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-nciistatus",
        "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-laying",
      "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-laying",
        "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
      "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-childdraft",
        "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services",
        "notes": [
          "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-fullfact",
      "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-fullfact",
        "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-planningfoi",
      "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-planningfoi",
        "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
        "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823",
        "notes": [
          "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-swcsa",
      "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
      "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-swcsa",
        "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
        "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-swletterpage",
      "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
      "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-swletterpage",
        "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
        "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-swletter",
      "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
      "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-swletter",
        "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
        "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-oakihr",
      "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-oakihr",
        "title": "Oak International Human Rights programme strategy",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/programmes/international-human-rights/",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-dffround",
      "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
      "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-dffround",
        "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
        "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w31-fa-s-dffliberty",
      "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
      "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w31-fa-s-dffliberty",
        "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
        "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/",
        "notes": [
          "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-dffpeer",
      "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
      "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-dffpeer",
        "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
        "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-dffpilot",
      "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
      "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-dffpilot",
        "title": "DFF participatory grant-making pilot announcement, 8 October 2024",
        "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/transforming-our-grantmaking-through-participatory-decision-making/",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption",
      "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
      "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption",
        "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
        "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/",
        "notes": [
          "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
      "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
      "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
        "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
        "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-judgment",
      "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
      "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-judgment",
        "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
        "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-oakstory",
      "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
      "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-oakstory",
        "title": "Oak: Helping to build a healthy information sphere",
        "url": "https://oakfnd.org/helping-to-build-a-healthy-information-sphere/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout",
      "title": "About Us",
      "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout",
        "title": "About Us",
        "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/about/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-oracle",
      "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-oracle",
        "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
        "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-oracleend",
      "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-oracleend",
        "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
        "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-privacy",
      "title": "Privacy Policy",
      "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-privacy",
        "title": "Privacy Policy",
        "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
      "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
        "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-iasexit",
      "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
      "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-iasexit",
        "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
        "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
      "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
        "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-cdmd",
      "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-cdmd",
        "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger",
      "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger",
        "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-cordis",
      "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
      "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-cordis",
        "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
        "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch",
      "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
      "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch",
        "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
        "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-d21",
      "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
      "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-d21",
        "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
        "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-finalreport",
      "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
      "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-finalreport",
        "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
        "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-resultsindex",
      "title": "AI4TRUST public results index: selected final deliverables",
      "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/results",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-resultsindex",
        "title": "AI4TRUST public results index: selected final deliverables",
        "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/results",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-finaltools",
      "title": "Final release of disinformation detection tools and warning system: unavailable document",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e529e5a48d",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-finaltools",
        "title": "Final release of disinformation detection tools and warning system: unavailable document",
        "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e529e5a48d",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w32-gdi-s-finaleval",
      "title": "Evaluation and impact assessment report: unavailable document",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e529e59930",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w32-gdi-s-finaleval",
        "title": "Evaluation and impact assessment report: unavailable document",
        "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e529e59930",
        "notes": [
          "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-dsa",
      "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
      "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-dsa",
        "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
        "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-delegated",
      "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
      "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-delegated",
        "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
        "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-definition",
      "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
      "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-definition",
        "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
        "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-faq",
      "title": "Commission FAQ — researcher access",
      "url": "https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/news/faqs-dsa-data-access-researchers-2025-07-03_en",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-faq",
        "title": "Commission FAQ — researcher access",
        "url": "https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/news/faqs-dsa-data-access-researchers-2025-07-03_en",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-portal",
      "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
      "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-portal",
        "title": "DSA access portal — inspected application shell",
        "url": "https://data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu/home",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-index",
      "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
      "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-index",
        "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
        "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-decision",
      "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-decision",
        "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
        "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-trustee",
      "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-trustee",
        "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
        "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-announcement",
      "title": "Commission announces binding AliExpress commitments",
      "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-makes-aliexpress-commitments-under-digital-services-act-binding",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-announcement",
        "title": "Commission announces binding AliExpress commitments",
        "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-makes-aliexpress-commitments-under-digital-services-act-binding",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-fine",
      "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
      "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-fine",
        "title": "Commission French representation — separate illegal-product fine",
        "url": "https://france.representation.ec.europa.eu/informations-et-evenements/informations/la-commission-inflige-une-amende-de-550-millions-deuros-aliexpress-2026-07-20_fr",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-auditindex",
      "title": "Commission audit index — AliExpress document links",
      "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-brings-transparency",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-auditindex",
        "title": "Commission audit index — AliExpress document links",
        "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-brings-transparency",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-audit",
      "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
      "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-audit",
        "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
        "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-implementation",
      "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
      "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-implementation",
        "title": "AliExpress2024/25 audit implementation report",
        "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/90b71a54574f7f673fd1f5c3987a137e.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-ankuraroute",
      "title": "Ankura generic monitorship page — excluded as case performance",
      "url": "https://ankura.com/services/monitorship-and-independent-oversight",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-ankuraroute",
        "title": "Ankura generic monitorship page — excluded as case performance",
        "url": "https://ankura.com/services/monitorship-and-independent-oversight",
        "notes": [
          "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-oversight-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-entry",
      "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
      "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-entry",
        "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
        "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-tracker",
      "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
      "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-tracker",
        "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
        "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-publications",
      "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
      "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-publications",
        "title": "Collaboratory publications index — Policy Paper14 link/date",
        "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/publications/",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-paper",
      "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
      "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-paper",
        "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
        "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-issues",
      "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
      "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-issues",
        "title": "Collaboratory issue tracker — bounded availability reports",
        "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/issue-tracker/",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-paper2024",
      "title": "Earlier2024 paper — inaccessible landing route",
      "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-library.de/items/39a490c3-f3c1-42a7-a530-318b17e9de49",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-paper2024",
        "title": "Earlier2024 paper — inaccessible landing route",
        "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-library.de/items/39a490c3-f3c1-42a7-a530-318b17e9de49",
        "notes": [
          "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-round2",
      "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-round2",
        "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-cdei",
      "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
      "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-cdei",
        "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
        "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
      "title": "OSDI official programme description",
      "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
        "title": "OSDI official programme description",
        "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-longlist",
      "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
      "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-longlist",
        "title": "OSDI discovery longlist — candidate solutions",
        "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/02/a-longlist-of-data-access-solutions-for-safety-tech-developers/",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-pa",
      "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
      "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-pa",
        "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
        "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-sandbox",
      "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
      "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-sandbox",
        "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
        "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-stcf",
      "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
      "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-stcf",
        "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
        "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-publicclaim",
      "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
      "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-publicclaim",
        "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
        "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-publicprivacy",
      "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
      "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-publicprivacy",
        "title": "PUBLIC privacy policy — January2026 controller",
        "url": "https://www.public.io/privacy-policy",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w33-con-s-publiccompany",
      "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507",
      "publisher": "",
      "kind": "Research source entry",
      "locator": "",
      "note": "Referenced in the original investigation. Open the cited record and its related research notes.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w33-con-s-publiccompany",
        "title": "PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED — registry overview",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10608507",
        "notes": [
          "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-source-control-home",
      "title": "ControlAI — Campaign and activities",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/",
      "kind": "primary campaign statement",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-10",
      "locator": "What does ControlAI do?; Endorsements",
      "note": "Campaign claims and endorsements are attributed to their publisher."
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-source-conjecture-about",
      "title": "Conjecture — Our story",
      "publisher": "Conjecture",
      "url": "https://www.conjecture.dev/about",
      "kind": "primary company history",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-10",
      "locator": "Our History",
      "note": "Founding dates are historical; they do not establish present ownership."
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-source-ofcom-age",
      "title": "Age checks to protect children online",
      "publisher": "Ofcom",
      "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online",
      "kind": "primary regulator publication",
      "published": "2025-01-16",
      "accessed": "2026-09-10",
      "locator": "What are online services required to do?; Highly effective age assurance",
      "note": "A dated January 2025 publication. Preserve its scope and implementation timetable."
    },
    {
      "id": "ed2-source-youtube-policy",
      "title": "Violent or graphic content policies",
      "publisher": "YouTube",
      "url": "https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802008?hl=en",
      "kind": "primary platform policy",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-10",
      "locator": "Age-restricted content; What happens if content violates this policy",
      "note": "Rules include contextual exceptions; this slice is not the entire policy."
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-001",
      "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive release, lines 78–103",
      "note": "Official announcement calls the legislation forthcoming and contains no named external drafting/advisory credits.",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-001",
        "title": "Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "date": "2026-09-03",
        "readScope": "Full substantive release, lines 78–103",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Official announcement calls the legislation forthcoming and contains no named external drafting/advisory credits.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-002",
      "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent",
      "publisher": "ControlAI; Andrea Miotti",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full post, lines 17–58; comments excluded",
      "note": "ControlAI says it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework. The group distinguishes its narrower ASI/precursor approach from the lawmakers' temporary advanced-AI pause and links its own earlier US discussion draft.",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-002",
        "title": "First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI",
        "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent",
        "publisher": "ControlAI; Andrea Miotti",
        "date": "2026-09-09",
        "readScope": "Full post, lines 17–58; comments excluded",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "ControlAI says it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework. The group distinguishes its narrower ASI/precursor approach from the lawmakers' temporary advanced-AI pause and links its own earlier US discussion draft.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-003",
      "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
      "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing",
      "publisher": "Axios; Maria Curi",
      "kind": "Contemporaneous reporting",
      "locator": "Full article, lines 42–58; source's letter not obtained",
      "note": "Axios reports Sanders scheduled Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a private bipartisan Senate briefing on September 16.",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-003",
        "title": "Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm",
        "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing",
        "publisher": "Axios; Maria Curi",
        "date": "2026-09-09",
        "readScope": "Full article, lines 42–58; source's letter not obtained",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Axios reports Sanders scheduled Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a private bipartisan Senate briefing on September 16.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read",
        "publicDerivationWordLimit": 25
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-004",
      "title": "ControlAI's Creator Outreach",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
      "publisher": "ControlAI; Andrea Miotti and Max Winga",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive post, lines 16–104",
      "note": "ControlAI describes constituent-contact creator work and consulting on the US bill. Its disclosed production requirements include topic agreement, review, ad-segment editorial input, no AI-company endorsement, and citation of a specified risk statement. These explain its advocacy mechanism, not whether creator campaigns caused this bill.",
      "published": "2026-09-08",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-004",
        "title": "ControlAI's Creator Outreach",
        "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
        "publisher": "ControlAI; Andrea Miotti and Max Winga",
        "date": "2026-09-08",
        "readScope": "Full substantive post, lines 16–104",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "ControlAI describes constituent-contact creator work and consulting on the US bill. Its disclosed production requirements include topic agreement, review, ad-segment editorial input, no AI-company endorsement, and citation of a specified risk statement. These explain its advocacy mechanism, not whether creator campaigns caused this bill.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-006",
      "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
      "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full landing page, lines 0–18; linked statutory PDF/DOCX delegated to root",
      "note": "ControlAI publicly identifies its own discussion draft dated June 24, 2026. This is a separate artifact, not established as the forthcoming congressional text.",
      "published": "2026-06-24",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-006",
        "title": "Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors",
        "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill",
        "publisher": "ControlAI",
        "date": "2026-06-24",
        "readScope": "Full landing page, lines 0–18; linked statutory PDF/DOCX delegated to root",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "ControlAI publicly identifies its own discussion draft dated June 24, 2026. This is a separate artifact, not established as the forthcoming congressional text.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-007",
      "title": "AI & Tech Brief: The tech contracting shake-up",
      "url": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-intelligence/ai-tech-brief/2026/09/03/ai-tech-brief-tech-contracting-shake-up/",
      "publisher": "WP Intelligence; Benjamin Guggenheim",
      "kind": "Contemporaneous reporting",
      "locator": "Target-read Banning Superintelligence section, lines 51–79",
      "note": "ControlAI told WP Intelligence it worked with both staffs; Leahy discussed scope. Corroboration remains the organization's account, not independent staff confirmation.",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-007",
        "title": "AI & Tech Brief: The tech contracting shake-up",
        "url": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-intelligence/ai-tech-brief/2026/09/03/ai-tech-brief-tech-contracting-shake-up/",
        "publisher": "WP Intelligence; Benjamin Guggenheim",
        "date": "2026-09-03",
        "readScope": "Target-read Banning Superintelligence section, lines 51–79",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "ControlAI told WP Intelligence it worked with both staffs; Leahy discussed scope. Corroboration remains the organization's account, not independent staff confirmation.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read",
        "publicDerivationWordLimit": 25
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-008",
      "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
      "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Target-read contributor list and scope/payment paragraph, lines 34–50; full technical investigation not evaluated",
      "note": "Names Ajeya Cotra as METR staff and report coauthor with Hjalmar Wijk and Ryan Greenblatt. Says the team worked at OpenAI over six days and took no OpenAI payment for this assessment.",
      "published": "2026-08-26",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-008",
        "title": "Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident",
        "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "date": "2026-08-26",
        "readScope": "Target-read contributor list and scope/payment paragraph, lines 34–50; full technical investigation not evaluated",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Names Ajeya Cotra as METR staff and report coauthor with Hjalmar Wijk and Ryan Greenblatt. Says the team worked at OpenAI over six days and took no OpenAI payment for this assessment.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-009",
      "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Target-read substantive announcement and Hinton paragraph, lines 78–87",
      "note": "Sanders says Geoffrey Hinton had recently told him AI would become smarter than humans. This establishes reported direct conversation before February 4, not a paid or continuing advisory appointment.",
      "published": "2026-02-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-009",
        "title": "Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "date": "2026-02-04",
        "readScope": "Target-read substantive announcement and Hinton paragraph, lines 78–87",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Sanders says Geoffrey Hinton had recently told him AI would become smarter than humans. This establishes reported direct conversation before February 4, not a paid or continuing advisory appointment.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-010",
      "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive video landing-page text, lines 75–79; embedded video not watched",
      "note": "Official landing page says Sanders is bringing American and Chinese AI scientists together to discuss risk. It supplies neither participant names nor a date in rendered text; contemporaneous reporting supplies those.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-010",
        "title": "The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "date": null,
        "readScope": "Full substantive video landing-page text, lines 75–79; embedded video not watched",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Official landing page says Sanders is bringing American and Chinese AI scientists together to discuss risk. It supplies neither participant names nor a date in rendered text; contemporaneous reporting supplies those.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-011",
      "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
      "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/",
      "publisher": "Broadband Breakfast",
      "kind": "Contemporaneous reporting",
      "locator": "Full substantive article, lines 27–62; primary video linked but not viewed",
      "note": "Reports Sanders's April 29 Capitol panel with Max Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan; the Chinese participants joined remotely. This is an observed public policy discussion, not proof of legislative authorship or foreign direction.",
      "published": "2026-04-29",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-011",
        "title": "Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI",
        "url": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/",
        "publisher": "Broadband Breakfast",
        "date": "2026-04-29",
        "readScope": "Full substantive article, lines 27–62; primary video linked but not viewed",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Reports Sanders's April 29 Capitol panel with Max Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan; the Chinese participants joined remotely. This is an observed public policy discussion, not proof of legislative authorship or foreign direction.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-012",
      "title": "Our people",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Target-read current board/leadership roster, lines 47–104",
      "note": "Current organizational roster identifies Max Tegmark as Founder and Chair and Anthony Aguirre as President and CEO. The roster alone does not turn Tegmark's individual participation into formal FLI authorship of Sanders's bill.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-012",
        "title": "Our people",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/",
        "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
        "date": null,
        "readScope": "Target-read current board/leadership roster, lines 47–104",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Current organizational roster identifies Max Tegmark as Founder and Chair and Anthony Aguirre as President and CEO. The roster alone does not turn Tegmark's individual participation into formal FLI authorship of Sanders's bill.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-013",
      "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
      "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01",
      "publisher": "CNN",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Target-read AI/Sanders interview, lines 317–371; rush-transcript caveat line 6",
      "note": "Sanders says he invited all senators to a meeting with experts about AI risks. His two Thursday references differ from Axios's September 16 schedule, so this verifies invitation intent without resolving the precise date or named roster.",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-013",
        "title": "The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026",
        "url": "https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01",
        "publisher": "CNN",
        "date": "2026-09-09",
        "readScope": "Target-read AI/Sanders interview, lines 317–371; rush-transcript caveat line 6",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Sanders says he invited all senators to a meeting with experts about AI risks. His two Thursday references differ from Axios's September 16 schedule, so this verifies invitation intent without resolving the precise date or named roster.",
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-016",
      "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
      "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Target-read physical PDF pages 1–4 (zero-based P0–P3), title and section 2, extracted lines 0–105; physical pages 14–17 (P13–P16), section 8(h) and section 9, extracted lines 448–489 and 507–535. Other sections not substantively assessed. Tool returned surrounding text; that is not claimed as complete reading.",
      "note": "Separate discussion draft with blank congressional identifiers and responsible Secretary. ASI definition requires all three specified characteristics. Temporary seizure, court-reviewed continued custody and court-ordered destruction are proposed. These powers are not enacted.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-adv-s-016",
        "title": "ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026",
        "url": "https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf",
        "publisher": "ControlAI",
        "date": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Target-read physical PDF pages 1–4 (zero-based P0–P3), title and section 2, extracted lines 0–105; physical pages 14–17 (P13–P16), section 8(h) and section 9, extracted lines 448–489 and 507–535. Other sections not substantively assessed. Tool returned surrounding text; that is not claimed as complete reading.",
        "evidenceParaphrase": "Separate discussion draft with blank congressional identifiers and responsible Secretary. ASI definition requires all three specified characteristics. Temporary seizure, court-reviewed continued custody and court-ordered destruction are proposed. These powers are not enacted.",
        "state": "target-read",
        "publicDerivationWordLimit": 200
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-candidate",
      "title": "Bernard Sanders — FEC candidate overview",
      "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/S4VT00033/?tab=summary",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Web reader candidate identity, principal committee and current statement-of-candidacy link; cached financial coverage ended March 31, 2026. Search index returned June 30. Numerical totals from this cached response are superseded for this investigation by native committee GET.",
      "note": "FEC identifies Senate candidate S4VT00033 as Bernard Sanders, Independent, Vermont, and Friends of Bernie Sanders C00411330 as his principal campaign committee. Its current candidacy statement is filing FEC-1864298 dated January 20, 2025.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-candidate",
        "title": "Bernard Sanders — FEC candidate overview",
        "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/S4VT00033/?tab=summary",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-11; web reader cache dated four months earlier",
        "readScope": "Web reader candidate identity, principal committee and current statement-of-candidacy link; cached financial coverage ended March 31, 2026. Search index returned June 30. Numerical totals from this cached response are superseded for this investigation by native committee GET.",
        "evidence": "FEC identifies Senate candidate S4VT00033 as Bernard Sanders, Independent, Vermont, and Friends of Bernie Sanders C00411330 as his principal campaign committee. Its current candidacy statement is filing FEC-1864298 dated January 20, 2025."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-form2",
      "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission; filed by Bernard Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full one-page PDF extracted text; candidate identity and election/committee designation fields. No private address information reproduced.",
      "note": "The signed statement designates Friends of Bernie Sanders as principal campaign committee for the 2030 Senate election. The 2025–2026 transaction period is therefore distinct from the election year.",
      "published": "2025-01-20",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-form2",
        "title": "Bernard Sanders — Form 2 statement of candidacy, FEC-1864298",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/985/202501209747628985/202501209747628985.pdf",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission; filed by Bernard Sanders",
        "date": "2025-01-20",
        "readScope": "Full one-page PDF extracted text; candidate identity and election/committee designation fields. No private address information reproduced.",
        "evidence": "The signed statement designates Friends of Bernie Sanders as principal campaign committee for the 2030 Senate election. The 2025–2026 transaction period is therefore distinct from the election year."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-committee",
      "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
      "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Native unauthenticated public HTTPS GET retained as fec-committee.html and fec-committee-text.txt; financial summary, coverage dates, committee ID and employer aggregation caveat inspected. Web-reader timeout bypassed once with native GET.",
      "note": "For January 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, FEC reports $24,928,186.19 receipts; $23,777,919.99 contributions; $23,777,892.99 individual contributions, including $6,505,715.83 itemized and $17,272,177.16 unitemized; $27 other-committee contributions; $12,833,935.63 disbursements; and $22,835,011.22 ending cash. Employer groups use reported free text and can split across spelling variants.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-committee",
        "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview",
        "url": "https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
        "date": "Observed 2026-09-11; financial coverage 2025-01-01 through 2026-06-30",
        "readScope": "Native unauthenticated public HTTPS GET retained as fec-committee.html and fec-committee-text.txt; financial summary, coverage dates, committee ID and employer aggregation caveat inspected. Web-reader timeout bypassed once with native GET.",
        "evidence": "For January 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, FEC reports $24,928,186.19 receipts; $23,777,919.99 contributions; $23,777,892.99 individual contributions, including $6,505,715.83 itemized and $17,272,177.16 unitemized; $27 other-committee contributions; $12,833,935.63 disbursements; and $22,835,011.22 ending cash. Employer groups use reported free text and can split across spelling variants."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-july-amendment",
      "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission; filed by Friends of Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Native public HTML filing summary and detailed summary, retained as fec-july-quarterly-2003883.html and -text.txt; schedules linked but not exhaustively enumerated.",
      "note": "The amended July quarterly report filed August 4 covers April 1–June 30, 2026. Period receipts are $1,459,232.50; contributions $1,307,502.49; disbursements $1,501,350.93; closing cash $22,835,011.22. Election-cycle-to-date fields use a different basis than the FEC 2025–2026 overview and must not be mixed or added.",
      "published": "2026-08-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-july-amendment",
        "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission; filed by Friends of Bernie Sanders",
        "date": "Filed 2026-08-04; coverage 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30",
        "readScope": "Native public HTML filing summary and detailed summary, retained as fec-july-quarterly-2003883.html and -text.txt; schedules linked but not exhaustively enumerated.",
        "evidence": "The amended July quarterly report filed August 4 covers April 1–June 30, 2026. Period receipts are $1,459,232.50; contributions $1,307,502.49; disbursements $1,501,350.93; closing cash $22,835,011.22. Election-cycle-to-date fields use a different basis than the FEC 2025–2026 overview and must not be mixed or added."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-names-combined",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee donor-name query",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ&contributor_name=TEGMARK&contributor_name=TALLINN&contributor_name=TUNA",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full JSON response; C00411330, two-year transaction period 2026, four contributor_name parameters; retained fec-name-filter-2026.json. Each name additionally checked separately.",
      "note": "The query returned results=[] and exact count zero. This is a bounded result for these filters, not proof no named person ever donated, no donations through other committees, or absence of unitemized activity.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-names-combined",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee donor-name query",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ&contributor_name=TEGMARK&contributor_name=TALLINN&contributor_name=TUNA",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full JSON response; C00411330, two-year transaction period 2026, four contributor_name parameters; retained fec-name-filter-2026.json. Each name additionally checked separately.",
        "evidence": "The query returned results=[] and exact count zero. This is a bounded result for these filters, not proof no named person ever donated, no donations through other committees, or absence of unitemized activity."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-employers-combined",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee employer query",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE&contributor_employer=CONTROL%20AI&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY&contributor_employer=COEFFICIENT&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY&contributor_employer=GOOD%20VENTURES",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full JSON response; C00411330, two-year transaction period 2026, seven contributor_employer parameters; retained fec-employer-filter-2026.json. Four central organisation terms additionally checked separately.",
      "note": "The query returned exact count zero. Any hypothetical employer matches would be individual donor reports carrying an employer string, not foundation or corporate contributions.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-employers-combined",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — bounded Sanders committee employer query",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE&contributor_employer=CONTROL%20AI&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY&contributor_employer=COEFFICIENT&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY&contributor_employer=GOOD%20VENTURES",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full JSON response; C00411330, two-year transaction period 2026, seven contributor_employer parameters; retained fec-employer-filter-2026.json. Four central organisation terms additionally checked separately.",
        "evidence": "The query returned exact count zero. Any hypothetical employer matches would be individual donor reports carrying an employer string, not foundation or corporate contributions."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-moskovitz",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-moskovitz-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-moskovitz",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-moskovitz-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-tegmark",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TEGMARK",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-tegmark-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-tegmark",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TEGMARK",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-tegmark-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-tallinn",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TALLINN",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-tallinn-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-tallinn",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TALLINN",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-tallinn-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-tuna",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TUNA",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-tuna-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-tuna",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TUNA",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_name filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-tuna-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-future-of-life",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / FUTURE OF LIFE / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-future-of-life-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-future-of-life",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / FUTURE OF LIFE / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=FUTURE%20OF%20LIFE",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-future-of-life-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-controlai",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / CONTROLAI / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-controlai-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-controlai",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / CONTROLAI / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=CONTROLAI",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-controlai-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-cais",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / CENTER FOR AI SAFETY / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-cais-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-cais",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / CENTER FOR AI SAFETY / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=CENTER%20FOR%20AI%20SAFETY",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-cais-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-open-philanthropy",
      "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / OPEN PHILANTHROPY / 2025–2026",
      "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-open-philanthropy-2026.json.",
      "note": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support.",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-fin-s-single-open-philanthropy",
        "title": "FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / OPEN PHILANTHROPY / 2025–2026",
        "url": "https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_employer=OPEN%20PHILANTHROPY",
        "publisher": "Federal Election Commission, OpenFEC",
        "date": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full native public JSON response; one contributor_employer filter, C00411330, two_year_transaction_period=2026; retained fec-single-open-philanthropy-2026.json.",
        "evidence": "Exact count zero, results empty. This narrow disclosed-record search does not establish a lifetime absence, complete employer spelling coverage, or the absence of undisclosed support."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-02",
      "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
      "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/",
      "publisher": "Information Technology and Innovation Foundation",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full statement, web lines 56-72",
      "note": "ITIF publishes President Daniel Castro's explicit opposition to this exact announcement: foregone health/productivity gains and strategic disadvantage against China, while supporting safety work alongside continued development. Existing cdi node combines Center for Data Innovation / ITIF; assign statement to ITIF specifically.",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-02",
        "title": "Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF",
        "url": "https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/",
        "publisher": "Information Technology and Innovation Foundation",
        "date": "2026-09-03",
        "readScope": "Full statement, web lines 56-72",
        "evidence": "ITIF publishes President Daniel Castro's explicit opposition to this exact announcement: foregone health/productivity gains and strategic disadvantage against China, while supporting safety work alongside continued development. Existing cdi node combines Center for Data Innovation / ITIF; assign statement to ITIF specifically."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-03",
      "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216",
      "publisher": "Civic Shout",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full public petition and joint-action preview, web lines 0-55",
      "note": "Hosts petition supporting exact Act. Preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click as participants; offers $2.25 in advertising credits for each signature participants recruit. States intended petition delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership and follow-up letters to members. Live-until date October 2, 2026. No delivered signatures, redeemed credits, expenditure amount, or lawmaker-office coordination established.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-03",
        "title": "Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216",
        "publisher": "Civic Shout",
        "date": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Full public petition and joint-action preview, web lines 0-55",
        "evidence": "Hosts petition supporting exact Act. Preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click as participants; offers $2.25 in advertising credits for each signature participants recruit. States intended petition delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership and follow-up letters to members. Live-until date October 2, 2026. No delivered signatures, redeemed credits, expenditure amount, or lawmaker-office coordination established."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-04",
      "title": "Caucus Members",
      "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members",
      "publisher": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Roster; leadership and Senate-member fields inspected, lines 0-99",
      "note": "Lists Greg Casar as chair and Bernie Sanders as Senate member. This is an institutional relationship between the bill's two announcers, not evidence of caucus-wide backing for the proposal.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-04",
        "title": "Caucus Members",
        "url": "https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members",
        "publisher": "Congressional Progressive Caucus",
        "date": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Roster; leadership and Senate-member fields inspected, lines 0-99",
        "evidence": "Lists Greg Casar as chair and Bernie Sanders as Senate member. This is an institutional relationship between the bill's two announcers, not evidence of caucus-wide backing for the proposal."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-06",
      "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
      "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos",
      "publisher": "Office of Representative Greg Casar",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive release including leadership and signatory list, web lines 0-23; linked letter PDF not inspected",
      "note": "Casar and Delia Ramirez co-led a call for Speaker Mike Johnson to arrange hearings with major AI CEOs and independent experts after reported security escapes and amid employment concerns. Additional signatories are listed. This is a documented oversight coalition; its signatures do not transfer to September's ban.",
      "published": "2026-08-10",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-06",
        "title": "Casar Leads Call For Congressional Hearings With AI CEOs",
        "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-leads-call-congressional-hearings-ai-ceos",
        "publisher": "Office of Representative Greg Casar",
        "date": "2026-08-10",
        "readScope": "Full substantive release including leadership and signatory list, web lines 0-23; linked letter PDF not inspected",
        "evidence": "Casar and Delia Ramirez co-led a call for Speaker Mike Johnson to arrange hearings with major AI CEOs and independent experts after reported security escapes and amid employment concerns. Additional signatories are listed. This is a documented oversight coalition; its signatures do not transfer to September's ban."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-08",
      "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
      "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major",
      "publisher": "Office of Representative Greg Casar",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive article via ordinary publisher HTTP GET after web returned 403; linked letters/company responses not inspected",
      "note": "Office says OpenAI and Anthropic replied to August 10 requests but responses were insufficient. Casar's follow-up demanded logs and fuller incident disclosures, with responses due September 15. Shows actual correspondence between Casar and both labs, framed as oversight/adversarial information demand, not advisory collaboration.",
      "published": "2026-09-02",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-08",
        "title": "Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses",
        "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major",
        "publisher": "Office of Representative Greg Casar",
        "date": "2026-09-02",
        "readScope": "Full substantive article via ordinary publisher HTTP GET after web returned 403; linked letters/company responses not inspected",
        "evidence": "Office says OpenAI and Anthropic replied to August 10 requests but responses were insufficient. Casar's follow-up demanded logs and fuller incident disclosures, with responses due September 15. Shows actual correspondence between Casar and both labs, framed as oversight/adversarial information demand, not advisory collaboration."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-09",
      "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
      "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass",
      "publisher": "Office of Representative Greg Casar",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive article via ordinary publisher HTTP GET after web returned 403; legislative text not inspected",
      "note": "Casar, Valerie Foushee and Sara Jacobs announced AI Tax and Work Protection Act. AFT president Randi Weingarten and Gene Sperling joined press call. Release names AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action as supporters. Proposal taxes large AI companies to fund Work Protection Administration jobs. Endorsements attach to this tax/jobs measure, not the September ban.",
      "published": "2026-08-07",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-09",
        "title": "Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment",
        "url": "https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass",
        "publisher": "Office of Representative Greg Casar",
        "date": "2026-08-07",
        "readScope": "Full substantive article via ordinary publisher HTTP GET after web returned 403; legislative text not inspected",
        "evidence": "Casar, Valerie Foushee and Sara Jacobs announced AI Tax and Work Protection Act. AFT president Randi Weingarten and Gene Sperling joined press call. Release names AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action as supporters. Proposal taxes large AI companies to fund Work Protection Administration jobs. Endorsements attach to this tax/jobs measure, not the September ban."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-10",
      "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/",
      "publisher": "Office of Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive March announcement; bill PDFs not inspected by coalition workstream",
      "note": "Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced a distinct data-center construction moratorium proposal, conditioned on safeguards for safety, workers, communities, utilities and environment, plus restrictions on export of computing infrastructure. Do not merge its sponsors/supporters into September proposal.",
      "published": "2026-03-25",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-10",
        "title": "Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/",
        "publisher": "Office of Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "date": "2026-03-25",
        "readScope": "Full substantive March announcement; bill PDFs not inspected by coalition workstream",
        "evidence": "Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced a distinct data-center construction moratorium proposal, conditioned on safeguards for safety, workers, communities, utilities and environment, plus restrictions on export of computing infrastructure. Do not merge its sponsors/supporters into September proposal."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-11",
      "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
      "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial",
      "publisher": "Gary Marcus / Marcus on AI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full authored article and postscript, lines 0-43; reader comments excluded",
      "note": "Marcus opposes permanent unilateral prohibition while accepting arguments for temporary pause and a regulator; points to benchmarking and possible authoritarian application. His postscript favors an Anthony Aguirre formulation permitting narrow tools and requiring high-assurance approval for more general/autonomous systems. This is explicit policy disagreement and public borrowing of wording, not an organizational working relationship.",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-11",
        "title": "The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it",
        "url": "https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial",
        "publisher": "Gary Marcus / Marcus on AI",
        "date": "2026-09-03",
        "readScope": "Full authored article and postscript, lines 0-43; reader comments excluded",
        "evidence": "Marcus opposes permanent unilateral prohibition while accepting arguments for temporary pause and a regulator; points to benchmarking and possible authoritarian application. His postscript favors an Anthony Aguirre formulation permitting narrow tools and requiring high-assurance approval for more general/autonomous systems. This is explicit policy disagreement and public borrowing of wording, not an organizational working relationship."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-13",
      "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
      "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation",
      "publisher": "National Nurses United",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Supported-legislation introduction and S.4214 section, lines 10-20 and 68-71",
      "note": "NNU places Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, S.4214, in its supported national legislation and describes the pause as time to enact protections for nurses, patients and workers. It is direct union support for March's moratorium; no September ASI-ban endorsement established from this source.",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-13",
        "title": "National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act",
        "url": "https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation",
        "publisher": "National Nurses United",
        "date": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-11",
        "readScope": "Supported-legislation introduction and S.4214 section, lines 10-20 and 68-71",
        "evidence": "NNU places Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act, S.4214, in its supported national legislation and describes the pause as time to enact protections for nurses, patients and workers. It is direct union support for March's moratorium; no September ASI-ban endorsement established from this source."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-14",
      "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
      "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation",
      "publisher": "Data for Progress",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full short publisher entry and embedded-PDF link",
      "note": "Publishes September poll under Abby Springs byline. Confirms publication date and provenance of the questionnaire/crosstabs.",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-14",
        "title": "Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)",
        "url": "https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation",
        "publisher": "Data for Progress",
        "date": "2026-09-09",
        "readScope": "Full short publisher entry and embedded-PDF link",
        "evidence": "Publishes September poll under Abby Springs byline. Confirms publication date and provenance of the questionnaire/crosstabs."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-15",
      "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
      "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf",
      "publisher": "Data for Progress",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Complete one-page PDF, methodology, question and all topline/party cells; screenshot requested",
      "note": "September 4-9 web-panel survey of 1,332 US likely voters, weighted by demographic and recalled-vote variables; publisher reports ±3 percentage points. 68% support /25% oppose a combined temporary advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown. Support D72/I70/R63. Question does not name bill/sponsors or mention prison, dissolution, export controls or cabinet agency. No poll commissioner/funder named.",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-coal-s-15",
        "title": "Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs",
        "url": "https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf",
        "publisher": "Data for Progress",
        "date": "2026-09-09",
        "readScope": "Complete one-page PDF, methodology, question and all topline/party cells; screenshot requested",
        "evidence": "September 4-9 web-panel survey of 1,332 US likely voters, weighted by demographic and recalled-vote variables; publisher reports ±3 percentage points. 68% support /25% oppose a combined temporary advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown. Support D72/I70/R63. Question does not name bill/sponsors or mention prison, dissolution, export controls or cabinet agency. No poll commissioner/funder named."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-s-summary",
      "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf",
      "publisher": "Offices of Senator Sanders and Representative Casar",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Complete one-page PDF, lines 0–30",
      "note": "Sponsor summary defines broad prohibition, advanced-AI pause, cabinet-level regulator, expert board, monitoring and destruction powers, corporate dissolution, up to 20 years imprisonment, and international/export-control policy. Summary, not filed statutory text.",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-s-summary",
        "title": "Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf",
        "publisher": "Offices of Senator Sanders and Representative Casar",
        "date": "2026-09-03",
        "readScope": "Complete one-page PDF, lines 0–30",
        "evidence": "Sponsor summary defines broad prohibition, advanced-AI pause, cabinet-level regulator, expert board, monitoring and destruction powers, corporate dissolution, up to 20 years imprisonment, and international/export-control policy. Summary, not filed statutory text."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w34-sanders-root-s-essay",
      "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
      "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now",
      "publisher": "Bernie Sanders / Friends of Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Full substantive essay lines17–64 and publisher footer111; reader comments excluded",
      "note": "Sanders publicly cites Cotra and Patel, urges international prohibition and frames public control versus technology oligarchs. Footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. Technical incident not independently audited in this inquiry.",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-11",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w34-sanders-root-s-essay",
        "title": "Pause AI Development NOW",
        "url": "https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now",
        "publisher": "Bernie Sanders / Friends of Bernie Sanders",
        "date": "2026-09-03",
        "readScope": "Full substantive essay lines17–64 and publisher footer111; reader comments excluded",
        "evidence": "Sanders publicly cites Cotra and Patel, urges international prohibition and frames public control versus technology oligarchs. Footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. Technical incident not independently audited in this inquiry."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-team",
      "title": "Current MIRI team",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Leadership and Board sections",
      "note": "Leadership and Board sections",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-team",
        "title": "Current MIRI team",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/",
        "readScope": "Leadership and Board sections",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-bio",
      "title": "MIRI biography",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Organizational self-description",
      "note": "Organizational self-description",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-bio",
        "title": "MIRI biography",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/team/eliezer-yudkowsky/",
        "readScope": "Organizational self-description",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-donors",
      "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Updated30 April2026; historical total credits include matching leveraged; recent means some support in previous5years",
      "note": "Updated30 April2026; historical total credits include matching leveraged; recent means some support in previous5years",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-donors",
        "title": "MIRI acknowledged contributors",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/",
        "readScope": "Updated30 April2026; historical total credits include matching leveraged; recent means some support in previous5years",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-crypto",
      "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Anonymous MKR donation liquidation and annual spending restrictions; Vitalik separate ETH gift",
      "note": "Anonymous MKR donation liquidation and annual spending restrictions; Vitalik separate ETH gift",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-crypto",
        "title": "MIRI two donations,13 May2021",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/",
        "readScope": "Anonymous MKR donation liquidation and annual spending restrictions; Vitalik separate ETH gift",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser",
      "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Planned2026 expansion vs completed activities; historical donors may not support newer mission",
      "note": "Planned2026 expansion vs completed activities; historical donors may not support newer mission",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-fundraiser",
        "title": "MIRI strategy and fundraiser,1 December2025",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/",
        "readScope": "Planned2026 expansion vs completed activities; historical donors may not support newer mission",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-sanders",
      "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Explicit briefing account; not bill drafting proof",
      "note": "Explicit briefing account; not bill drafting proof",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-sanders",
        "title": "MIRI Newsletter125,19 March2026",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/",
        "readScope": "Explicit briefing account; not bill drafting proof",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-video",
      "title": "Senator Sanders official video,4 March2026",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oS35oWWl28",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Publisher metadata inspected; not full video viewing",
      "note": "Publisher metadata inspected; not full video viewing",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-video",
        "title": "Senator Sanders official video,4 March2026",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oS35oWWl28",
        "readScope": "Publisher metadata inspected; not full video viewing",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-lw",
      "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Historical2009 founding and MIRI ownership; not present title determination",
      "note": "Historical2009 founding and MIRI ownership; not present title determination",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-lw",
        "title": "LessWrong FAQ",
        "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq",
        "readScope": "Historical2009 founding and MIRI ownership; not present title determination",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-lightcone",
      "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
      "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Lists LessWrong infrastructure; does not establish Yudkowsky control",
      "note": "Lists LessWrong infrastructure; does not establish Yudkowsky control",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-lightcone",
        "title": "Lightcone current projects and team",
        "url": "https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/",
        "readScope": "Lists LessWrong infrastructure; does not establish Yudkowsky control",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-controlai",
      "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Documented promotional adoption",
      "note": "Documented promotional adoption",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-controlai",
        "title": "ControlAI book promotion",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign",
        "readScope": "Documented promotional adoption",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-briefing",
      "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Uses Yudkowsky inferential-distance concept; no employment inference",
      "note": "Uses Yudkowsky inferential-distance concept; no employment inference",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-briefing",
        "title": "ControlAI briefing-method account",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai",
        "readScope": "Uses Yudkowsky inferential-distance concept; no employment inference",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-time",
      "title": "Yudkowsky TIME essay,29 March2023",
      "url": "https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Authored advocacy; hypothetical law and enforcement, not enacted powers",
      "note": "Authored advocacy; hypothetical law and enforcement, not enacted powers",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-time",
        "title": "Yudkowsky TIME essay,29 March2023",
        "url": "https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/",
        "readScope": "Authored advocacy; hypothetical law and enforcement, not enacted powers",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-y-s-treaty",
      "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Prior campaign primary analysis; May2026 version, separate from ControlAI and Sanders proposals",
      "note": "Prior campaign primary analysis; May2026 version, separate from ControlAI and Sanders proposals",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-y-s-treaty",
        "title": "MIRI international agreement v3",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3",
        "readScope": "Prior campaign primary analysis; May2026 version, separate from ControlAI and Sanders proposals",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-profile",
      "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
      "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Self-description; not independent employment verification",
      "note": "Self-description; not independent employment verification",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-profile",
        "title": "Author-controlled identity and repositories",
        "url": "https://github.com/rohan-paul",
        "readScope": "Self-description; not independent employment verification",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-company",
      "title": "Publication business self-description",
      "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/rohans-bytes",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Company-supplied fields; not registry or payroll",
      "note": "Company-supplied fields; not registry or payroll",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-company",
        "title": "Publication business self-description",
        "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/rohans-bytes",
        "readScope": "Company-supplied fields; not registry or payroll",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-pika",
      "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Publisher sponsor label; contract and payment unseen",
      "note": "Publisher sponsor label; contract and payment unseen",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-pika",
        "title": "Pika disclosed sponsor, 28 February 2026",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with",
        "readScope": "Publisher sponsor label; contract and payment unseen",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-toyo",
      "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Internal edition heading says 10 July; preserve discrepancy",
      "note": "Internal edition heading says 10 July; preserve discrepancy",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-toyo",
        "title": "Toyo disclosed sponsor, 11 July 2026",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe",
        "readScope": "Internal edition heading says 10 July; preserve discrepancy",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-tars",
      "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Internal heading says 21 August; no independent product verification",
      "note": "Internal heading says 21 August; no independent product verification",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-tars",
        "title": "TARS Robotics disclosed sponsor, 22 August 2026",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published",
        "readScope": "Internal heading says 21 August; no independent product verification",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-aug11",
      "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Quotation of Sanders is not endorsement; performance claims not assessed",
      "note": "Quotation of Sanders is not endorsement; performance claims not assessed",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-aug11",
        "title": "Local model coverage, Zuckerberg, Sanders, Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b",
        "readScope": "Quotation of Sanders is not endorsement; performance claims not assessed",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-july24",
      "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Internal heading 23 July; investigated coverage, not all underlying technical claims",
      "note": "Internal heading 23 July; investigated coverage, not all underlying technical claims",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-july24",
        "title": "Sandbox incident with limiting context and Srinivas criticism, 24 July",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of",
        "readScope": "Internal heading 23 July; investigated coverage, not all underlying technical claims",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-coxon-wsj",
      "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
      "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Original public platform oEmbed; long post truncated",
      "note": "Original public platform oEmbed; long post truncated",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-coxon-wsj",
        "title": "Coxon WSJ amplification, 9 September",
        "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069",
        "readScope": "Original public platform oEmbed; long post truncated",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-coxon-nbc",
      "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
      "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Original public platform oEmbed; long post truncated; not full video inspection",
      "note": "Original public platform oEmbed; long post truncated; not full video inspection",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-coxon-nbc",
        "title": "Coxon NBC clip amplification, 10 September",
        "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195",
        "readScope": "Original public platform oEmbed; long post truncated; not full video inspection",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-sacks",
      "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
      "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Original platform embed opening; endorsement of reading, not entire platform",
      "note": "Original platform embed opening; endorsement of reading, not entire platform",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-sacks",
        "title": "Recommended David Sacks post, 17 August",
        "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996",
        "readScope": "Original platform embed opening; endorsement of reading, not entire platform",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-anthropic",
      "title": "Anthropic alignment-assessment amplification, 9 September",
      "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Original platform embed opening; underlying incident not independently re-audited",
      "note": "Original platform embed opening; underlying incident not independently re-audited",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-anthropic",
        "title": "Anthropic alignment-assessment amplification, 9 September",
        "url": "https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018",
        "readScope": "Original platform embed opening; underlying incident not independently re-audited",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-controlai",
      "title": "Miotti and Winga creator-outreach account, 8 September",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "ControlAI self-report; no Paul mention; underlying negotiations not published",
      "note": "ControlAI self-report; no Paul mention; underlying negotiations not published",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-controlai",
        "title": "Miotti and Winga creator-outreach account, 8 September",
        "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
        "readScope": "ControlAI self-report; no Paul mention; underlying negotiations not published",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-extra-6",
      "title": "openai-stops-reinforcement-learning",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-stops-reinforcement-learning",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "See narrative-and-policy.md for exact reading scope.",
      "note": "See narrative-and-policy.md for exact reading scope.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-extra-6",
        "title": "openai-stops-reinforcement-learning",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-stops-reinforcement-learning",
        "readScope": "See narrative-and-policy.md for exact reading scope.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-r-src-extra-7",
      "title": "situational-awareness-saw-the-future",
      "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/situational-awareness-saw-the-future",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "See narrative-and-policy.md for exact reading scope.",
      "note": "See narrative-and-policy.md for exact reading scope.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-r-src-extra-7",
        "title": "situational-awareness-saw-the-future",
        "url": "https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/situational-awareness-saw-the-future",
        "readScope": "See narrative-and-policy.md for exact reading scope.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-outreach",
      "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Sponsor’s own account: identity, disputed negotiation, partnership conditions and reported outcomes. Correspondence and individual contracts not published.",
      "note": "Sponsor’s own account: identity, disputed negotiation, partnership conditions and reported outcomes. Correspondence and individual contracts not published.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-outreach",
        "title": "ControlAI’s Creator Outreach — Miotti and Winga, 8 September 2026",
        "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
        "readScope": "Sponsor’s own account: identity, disputed negotiation, partnership conditions and reported outcomes. Correspondence and individual contracts not published.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-sabine",
      "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg",
      "publisher": "Sabine Hossenfelder",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "User-supplied transcript inspected, especially 1:03–3:05. Her offeror is unnamed in this account.",
      "note": "User-supplied transcript inspected, especially 1:03–3:05. Her offeror is unnamed in this account.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-sabine",
        "title": "I Was Offered Money to Tell You AI Will Kill Us — 5 September 2026",
        "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg",
        "readScope": "User-supplied transcript inspected, especially 1:03–3:05. Her offeror is unnamed in this account.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-ra-comments",
      "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team",
      "publisher": "LessWrong / channel operator",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Writer’s October 2023 comments. Invitation and adaptations, not a commissioning contract.",
      "note": "Writer’s October 2023 comments. Invitation and adaptations, not a commissioning contract.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-ra-comments",
        "title": "Rational Animations operator on Yudkowsky adaptations and collaboration",
        "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team",
        "readScope": "Writer’s October 2023 comments. Invitation and adaptations, not a commissioning contract.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-ra-writer",
      "title": "Alice Liu interview: Rational Animations writing and editing",
      "url": "https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think",
      "publisher": "Inkhaven Spotlight",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "25 April 2026 participant interview; multiple writers and Robert Miles’s editing.",
      "note": "25 April 2026 participant interview; multiple writers and Robert Miles’s editing.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-ra-writer",
        "title": "Alice Liu interview: Rational Animations writing and editing",
        "url": "https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think",
        "readScope": "25 April 2026 participant interview; multiple writers and Robert Miles’s editing.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-ra-grant",
      "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
      "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations",
      "publisher": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Published 3 June; $30,000 Rational Animations award, Q1 round and April payout. Aggregate report qualified by acceptance.",
      "note": "Published 3 June; $30,000 Rational Animations award, Q1 round and April payout. Aggregate report qualified by acceptance.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-ra-grant",
        "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund — May 2021 grant recommendations",
        "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations",
        "readScope": "Published 3 June; $30,000 Rational Animations award, Q1 round and April payout. Aggregate report qualified by acceptance.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-miri-action",
      "title": "MIRI: Take Action",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/take-action/",
      "publisher": "MIRI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Public recommendation of Rational Animations; honesty and anti-manipulation guidance.",
      "note": "Public recommendation of Rational Animations; honesty and anti-manipulation guidance.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-miri-action",
        "title": "MIRI: Take Action",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/take-action/",
        "readScope": "Public recommendation of Rational Animations; honesty and anti-manipulation guidance.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-ra-about",
      "title": "Rational Animations: About us",
      "url": "https://www.rationalanimations.com/about-us",
      "publisher": "Rational Animations",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "International production team, AI safety focus and animation services.",
      "note": "International production team, AI safety focus and animation services.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-ra-about",
        "title": "Rational Animations: About us",
        "url": "https://www.rationalanimations.com/about-us",
        "readScope": "International production team, AI safety focus and animation services.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-ca-plan",
      "title": "ControlAI: Plan to prevent superintelligence",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "20 April 2026: repeatable campaigning and expansion scenario; not an audited budget.",
      "note": "20 April 2026: repeatable campaigning and expansion scenario; not an audited budget.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-ca-plan",
        "title": "ControlAI: Plan to prevent superintelligence",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan",
        "readScope": "20 April 2026: repeatable campaigning and expansion scenario; not an audited budget.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-ca-dip",
      "title": "ControlAI: Designing the Direct Institutional Plan",
      "url": "https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Comparison of strategies; common concerns do not establish institutional unanimity.",
      "note": "Comparison of strategies; common concerns do not establish institutional unanimity.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-ca-dip",
        "title": "ControlAI: Designing the Direct Institutional Plan",
        "url": "https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip",
        "readScope": "Comparison of strategies; common concerns do not establish institutional unanimity.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w35-s-miri-history",
      "title": "MIRI: Transparency",
      "url": "https://intelligence.org/transparency/",
      "publisher": "MIRI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Institutional history and name change.",
      "note": "Institutional history and name change.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w35-s-miri-history",
        "title": "MIRI: Transparency",
        "url": "https://intelligence.org/transparency/",
        "readScope": "Institutional history and name change.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-ledger",
      "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
      "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Captured ledger: 1,134 dated rows through 31 March 2025; selected disbursements and vehicle footnotes. Donor report, not recipient receipts.",
      "note": "Captured ledger: 1,134 dated rows through 31 March 2025; selected disbursements and vehicle footnotes. Donor report, not recipient receipts.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-ledger",
        "title": "Jaan Tallinn: disclosed donations",
        "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html",
        "readScope": "Captured ledger: 1,134 dated rows through 31 March 2025; selected disbursements and vehicle footnotes. Donor report, not recipient receipts.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-methods",
      "title": "Tallinn: funding methods",
      "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/#funding-methods",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Distinctions among committees, regrantors, direct grants and unrestricted support.",
      "note": "Distinctions among committees, regrantors, direct grants and unrestricted support.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-methods",
        "title": "Tallinn: funding methods",
        "url": "https://jaan.info/philanthropy/#funding-methods",
        "readScope": "Distinctions among committees, regrantors, direct grants and unrestricted support.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-registry",
      "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Company 15088415; name changed from Secure Future Research Ltd on 10 September 2026.",
      "note": "Company 15088415; name changed from Secure Future Research Ltd on 10 September 2026.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-registry",
        "title": "CONTROLAI company record",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415",
        "readScope": "Company 15088415; name changed from Secure Future Research Ltd on 10 September 2026.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-psc",
      "title": "ControlAI significant control register",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Miotti and Behrens voting and appointment rights; company limited by guarantee, not share ownership.",
      "note": "Miotti and Behrens voting and appointment rights; company limited by guarantee, not share ownership.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-psc",
        "title": "ControlAI significant control register",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control",
        "readScope": "Miotti and Behrens voting and appointment rights; company limited by guarantee, not share ownership.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-accounts",
      "title": "ControlAI 2025 accounts",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Scanned accounts inspected. No income-and-expenditure statement; balance-sheet residual is not established annual profit.",
      "note": "Scanned accounts inspected. No income-and-expenditure statement; balance-sheet residual is not established annual profit.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-accounts",
        "title": "ControlAI 2025 accounts",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf",
        "readScope": "Scanned accounts inspected. No income-and-expenditure statement; balance-sheet residual is not established annual profit.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-filings",
      "title": "ControlAI filing history",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "2024 and 2025 accounts; January 2024 articles and resolution inspected locally. No Tallinn-specific rights found in inspected articles.",
      "note": "2024 and 2025 accounts; January 2024 articles and resolution inspected locally. No Tallinn-specific rights found in inspected articles.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-filings",
        "title": "ControlAI filing history",
        "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history",
        "readScope": "2024 and 2025 accounts; January 2024 articles and resolution inspected locally. No Tallinn-specific rights found in inspected articles.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-fli",
      "title": "FLI: Jaan Tallinn biography",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Founding and board roles; commercial background. Older advisory appointments not assumed current.",
      "note": "Founding and board roles; commercial background. Older advisory appointments not assumed current.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-fli",
        "title": "FLI: Jaan Tallinn biography",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/",
        "readScope": "Founding and board roles; commercial background. Older advisory appointments not assumed current.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-flifin",
      "title": "FLI financial transparency",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Donor-policy influence statement distinguishes Tallinn because of his board role.",
      "note": "Donor-policy influence statement distinguishes Tallinn because of his board role.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-flifin",
        "title": "FLI financial transparency",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/",
        "readScope": "Donor-policy influence statement distinguishes Tallinn because of his board role.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-sff",
      "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
      "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Donor deference weights and allocation process; recommendations are not disbursements.",
      "note": "Donor deference weights and allocation process; recommendations are not disbursements.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-sff",
        "title": "SFF 2025 recommendations",
        "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.fund/2025/recommendations",
        "readScope": "Donor deference weights and allocation process; recommendations are not disbursements.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-sfc",
      "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
      "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Primary client Tallinn; owners, leadership and facilitation decisions.",
      "note": "Primary client Tallinn; owners, leadership and facilitation decisions.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-sfc",
        "title": "SFC September 2026 update",
        "url": "https://survivalandflourishing.com/2026-update",
        "readScope": "Primary client Tallinn; owners, leadership and facilitation decisions.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-anthropic",
      "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Tallinn led the entire $124m round; amount is not his personal investment.",
      "note": "Tallinn led the entire $124m round; amount is not his personal investment.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-anthropic",
        "title": "Anthropic 2021 financing announcement",
        "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-124-million-to-build-more-reliable-general-ai-systems",
        "readScope": "Tallinn led the entire $124m round; amount is not his personal investment.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-metaplanet",
      "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
      "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Portfolio entries including Conjecture, Anthropic and DeepMind; not proof of present ownership percentages.",
      "note": "Portfolio entries including Conjecture, Anthropic and DeepMind; not proof of present ownership percentages.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-metaplanet",
        "title": "Metaplanet portfolio",
        "url": "https://metaplanet.com/portfolio",
        "readScope": "Portfolio entries including Conjecture, Anthropic and DeepMind; not proof of present ownership percentages.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-jueyan",
      "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
      "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Biography identifies manager of pooled AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund; page hosting does not establish Schmidt fund ownership.",
      "note": "Biography identifies manager of pooled AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund; page hosting does not establish Schmidt fund ownership.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-jueyan",
        "title": "Schmidt Sciences: JueYan Zhang biography",
        "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/",
        "readScope": "Biography identifies manager of pooled AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund; page hosting does not establish Schmidt fund ownership.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-frame",
      "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
      "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Captured public application bundle: funders, independent and amplifier tracks, asserted selection and editorial independence.",
      "note": "Captured public application bundle: funders, independent and amplifier tracks, asserted selection and editorial independence.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-frame",
        "title": "Frame fellowship public FAQ",
        "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js",
        "readScope": "Captured public application bundle: funders, independent and amplifier tracks, asserted selection and editorial independence.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-manifund",
      "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
      "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Outgoing grant amounts, including $41,162 for SB-1047 documentary.",
      "note": "Outgoing grant amounts, including $41,162 for SB-1047 documentary.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-manifund",
        "title": "AISTOF public grant account",
        "url": "https://manifund.org/JueYan",
        "readScope": "Outgoing grant amounts, including $41,162 for SB-1047 documentary.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-film",
      "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
      "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Complete Grant; AISTOF donation on 21 January 2025; project describes interviews with proponents and opponents.",
      "note": "Complete Grant; AISTOF donation on 21 January 2025; project describes interviews with proponents and opponents.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-film",
        "title": "SB-1047 documentary grant",
        "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations",
        "readScope": "Complete Grant; AISTOF donation on 21 January 2025; project describes interviews with proponents and opponents.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-aipi",
      "title": "AIPI donation page",
      "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Recipient donation page embeds Hack Club fiscal route.",
      "note": "Recipient donation page embeds Hack Club fiscal route.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-aipi",
        "title": "AIPI donation page",
        "url": "https://theaipi.org/donate/",
        "readScope": "Recipient donation page embeds Hack Club fiscal route.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-aipigrant",
      "title": "AIPI public fundraising proposal",
      "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/support-the-ai-policy-institute-for-agi-preparedness-polling-and-education",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Recipient proposal for polling and education; later funding period is not added to 2024 ledger payments.",
      "note": "Recipient proposal for polling and education; later funding period is not added to 2024 ledger payments.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-aipigrant",
        "title": "AIPI public fundraising proposal",
        "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/support-the-ai-policy-institute-for-agi-preparedness-polling-and-education",
        "readScope": "Recipient proposal for polling and education; later funding period is not added to 2024 ledger payments.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-hack",
      "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
      "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Hack Foundation, doing business as Hack Club; fiscal sponsor identity.",
      "note": "Hack Foundation, doing business as Hack Club; fiscal sponsor identity.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-hack",
        "title": "HCB fiscal sponsorship identity",
        "url": "https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding",
        "readScope": "Hack Foundation, doing business as Hack Club; fiscal sponsor identity.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-pause",
      "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
      "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Declared division of labor with MIRI, FLI and ControlAI; public pressure and incident response. Rejects violence and dishonesty.",
      "note": "Declared division of labor with MIRI, FLI and ControlAI; public pressure and incident response. Rejects violence and dishonesty.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-pause",
        "title": "PauseAI Global theory of change",
        "url": "https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change",
        "readScope": "Declared division of labor with MIRI, FLI and ControlAI; public pressure and incident response. Rejects violence and dishonesty.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-roadmap",
      "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
      "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Conditional euro-denominated funding scenarios; proposed campaigns and organizations, not observed expenditure.",
      "note": "Conditional euro-denominated funding scenarios; proposed campaigns and organizations, not observed expenditure.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-roadmap",
        "title": "PauseAI roadmap",
        "url": "https://pauseai.org/roadmap",
        "readScope": "Conditional euro-denominated funding scenarios; proposed campaigns and organizations, not observed expenditure.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-micro",
      "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
      "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Typical size, approval roles, grant letters and reporting requirements.",
      "note": "Typical size, approval roles, grant letters and reporting requirements.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-micro",
        "title": "PauseAI microgrant rules",
        "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants",
        "readScope": "Typical size, approval roles, grant letters and reporting requirements.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-org",
      "title": "PauseAI organization",
      "url": "https://pauseai.org/organization",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Executive and chapter coordination, local adaptation.",
      "note": "Executive and chapter coordination, local adaptation.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-org",
        "title": "PauseAI organization",
        "url": "https://pauseai.org/organization",
        "readScope": "Executive and chapter coordination, local adaptation.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-cltr",
      "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
      "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Printed pages 15 and 21: claimed guide-section authorship; all 2023 receipts of £470,224 attributed to SFF.",
      "note": "Printed pages 15 and 21: claimed guide-section authorship; all 2023 receipts of £470,224 attributed to SFF.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-cltr",
        "title": "CLTR 2023 annual report",
        "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf",
        "readScope": "Printed pages 15 and 21: claimed guide-section authorship; all 2023 receipts of £470,224 attributed to SFF.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-guide",
      "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "27 October 2023 guide; acknowledged contributors; expressly nonmandatory.",
      "note": "27 October 2023 guide; acknowledged contributors; expressly nonmandatory.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-guide",
        "title": "UK emerging frontier-AI safety processes",
        "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety",
        "readScope": "27 October 2023 guide; acknowledged contributors; expressly nonmandatory.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-loan",
      "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "31 March 2023 first-party reply, inspected through GreaterWrong mirror: Tallinn ownership and $20m loan. Contract not obtained.",
      "note": "31 March 2023 first-party reply, inspected through GreaterWrong mirror: Tallinn ownership and $20m loan. Contract not obtained.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-loan",
        "title": "Habryka on Slimrock property financing",
        "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz",
        "readScope": "31 March 2023 first-party reply, inspected through GreaterWrong mirror: Tallinn ownership and $20m loan. Contract not obtained.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w36-s-advance",
      "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "13 December 2025: mortgage servicing and distinct FTX-settlement advance offset against future gifts.",
      "note": "13 December 2025: mortgage servicing and distinct FTX-settlement advance offset against future gifts.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w36-s-advance",
        "title": "Lightcone December 2025 fundraiser",
        "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y",
        "readScope": "13 December 2025: mortgage servicing and distinct FTX-settlement advance offset against future gifts.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-privacy",
      "title": "Civic Shout: privacy policy",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Updated 20 August 2025; owner/operator Civic Shout LLC and consent/data practices. No LLC members, beneficial owners or stakes disclosed.",
      "note": "Updated 20 August 2025; owner/operator Civic Shout LLC and consent/data practices. No LLC members, beneficial owners or stakes disclosed.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-privacy",
        "title": "Civic Shout: privacy policy",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy",
        "readScope": "Updated 20 August 2025; owner/operator Civic Shout LLC and consent/data practices. No LLC members, beneficial owners or stakes disclosed.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-partners",
      "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Updated 31 January 2026; Joint Action admission, hosting, data access, referral attribution, noncash credits and restricted redemption. Published rules, not campaign-specific contracts or actual outcomes.",
      "note": "Updated 31 January 2026; Joint Action admission, hosting, data access, referral attribution, noncash credits and restricted redemption. Published rules, not campaign-specific contracts or actual outcomes.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-partners",
        "title": "Civic Shout: Partner Terms",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service",
        "readScope": "Updated 31 January 2026; Joint Action admission, hosting, data access, referral attribution, noncash credits and restricted redemption. Published rules, not campaign-specific contracts or actual outcomes.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-affiliates",
      "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Sections1–2: qualifying email/SMS referrals, variable revenue share, caps and Stripe payouts; optional credits. Separate from Joint Actions; no particular affiliate payment verified.",
      "note": "Sections1–2: qualifying email/SMS referrals, variable revenue share, caps and Stripe payouts; optional credits. Separate from Joint Actions; no particular affiliate payment verified.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-affiliates",
        "title": "Civic Shout: Affiliate Terms",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service",
        "readScope": "Sections1–2: qualifying email/SMS referrals, variable revenue share, caps and Stripe payouts; optional credits. Separate from Joint Actions; no particular affiliate payment verified.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-pricing",
      "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Snapshot read 12 September 2026: lead/click prices, prepaid discounts and named customer testimonials. Provider disclosure, not customer invoices.",
      "note": "Snapshot read 12 September 2026: lead/click prices, prepaid discounts and named customer testimonials. Provider disclosure, not customer invoices.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-pricing",
        "title": "Civic Shout: price sheet",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/pricing",
        "readScope": "Snapshot read 12 September 2026: lead/click prices, prepaid discounts and named customer testimonials. Provider disclosure, not customer invoices.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-content",
      "title": "Civic Shout: content policy",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Staff review, progressive-only orientation, conservative-campaign exclusion, false/misleading-content prohibition and direct-donation restrictions for CPC ads.",
      "note": "Staff review, progressive-only orientation, conservative-campaign exclusion, false/misleading-content prohibition and direct-donation restrictions for CPC ads.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-content",
        "title": "Civic Shout: content policy",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy",
        "readScope": "Staff review, progressive-only orientation, conservative-campaign exclusion, false/misleading-content prohibition and direct-donation restrictions for CPC ads.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-host",
      "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Host eligibility, signer list growth, optional subsequent actions and named program lead Marie Bergen. Provider representation, not audited results.",
      "note": "Host eligibility, signer list growth, optional subsequent actions and named program lead Marie Bergen. Provider representation, not audited results.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-host",
        "title": "Civic Shout: hosting Joint Actions",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host",
        "readScope": "Host eligibility, signer list growth, optional subsequent actions and named program lead Marie Bergen. Provider representation, not audited results.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-petition",
      "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
      "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Read 12 September 2026: Civic Shout host; Action Collective, College Democrats of America and Left Click participants; USD 2.25 credit offer and planned congressional delivery. Incident allegations were not independently checked.",
      "note": "Read 12 September 2026: Civic Shout host; Action Collective, College Democrats of America and Left Click participants; USD 2.25 credit offer and planned congressional delivery. Incident allegations were not independently checked.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-petition",
        "title": "AI prohibition: live Joint Action preview",
        "url": "https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216",
        "readScope": "Read 12 September 2026: Civic Shout host; Action Collective, College Democrats of America and Left Click participants; USD 2.25 credit offer and planned congressional delivery. Incident allegations were not independently checked.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-foundation",
      "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
      "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Current footer: Civic Shout LLC, Delaware LLC, operating Foundation as Players Philanthropy Fund Inc project, EIN 27-6601178. Sponsor described as Texas nonprofit corporation; not a corporate ownership record.",
      "note": "Current footer: Civic Shout LLC, Delaware LLC, operating Foundation as Players Philanthropy Fund Inc project, EIN 27-6601178. Sponsor described as Texas nonprofit corporation; not a corporate ownership record.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-foundation",
        "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: legal notice",
        "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/",
        "readScope": "Current footer: Civic Shout LLC, Delaware LLC, operating Foundation as Players Philanthropy Fund Inc project, EIN 27-6601178. Sponsor described as Texas nonprofit corporation; not a corporate ownership record.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-foundation_about",
      "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
      "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden biographies and project mission. Does not establish corporate board powers or equity ownership.",
      "note": "Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden biographies and project mission. Does not establish corporate board powers or equity ownership.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-foundation_about",
        "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: team",
        "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about",
        "readScope": "Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden biographies and project mission. Does not establish corporate board powers or equity ownership.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-foundation_funders",
      "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
      "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "USD 25,000 package for one nonprofit with 30,000 subscribers/consultation and USD 500,000 for 20 groups; donor-selected issue areas. Offer, not actual grants or receipts.",
      "note": "USD 25,000 package for one nonprofit with 30,000 subscribers/consultation and USD 500,000 for 20 groups; donor-selected issue areas. Offer, not actual grants or receipts.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-foundation_funders",
        "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation: donor offer",
        "url": "https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders",
        "readScope": "USD 25,000 package for one nonprofit with 30,000 subscribers/consultation and USD 500,000 for 20 groups; donor-selected issue areas. Offer, not actual grants or receipts.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-bluevote",
      "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "C00869040, PDF pp9–10 visually inspected: USD 500 on 2025-09-02 SB21B.4423, USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 SB21B.4424, Advocacy platform. No complete-FEC or latest-amendment claim.",
      "note": "C00869040, PDF pp9–10 visually inspected: USD 500 on 2025-09-02 SB21B.4423, USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 SB21B.4424, Advocacy platform. No complete-FEC or latest-amendment claim.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-bluevote",
        "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG: FEC filing dated28 January 2026",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf",
        "readScope": "C00869040, PDF pp9–10 visually inspected: USD 500 on 2025-09-02 SB21B.4423, USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 SB21B.4424, Advocacy platform. No complete-FEC or latest-amendment claim.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-forwardblue",
      "title": "Forward Blue PAC: FEC filing dated28 January 2024",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/435/202401289600454435/202401289600454435.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "PDF p53 USD 3333.33 Civic Shout staff-advance memo dated2023-11-27; pp 63/66 corresponding obligations and reimbursement. Do not count multiple descriptions as new direct payments.",
      "note": "PDF p53 USD 3333.33 Civic Shout staff-advance memo dated2023-11-27; pp 63/66 corresponding obligations and reimbursement. Do not count multiple descriptions as new direct payments.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-forwardblue",
        "title": "Forward Blue PAC: FEC filing dated28 January 2024",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/435/202401289600454435/202401289600454435.pdf",
        "readScope": "PDF p53 USD 3333.33 Civic Shout staff-advance memo dated2023-11-27; pp 63/66 corresponding obligations and reimbursement. Do not count multiple descriptions as new direct payments.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-nelson",
      "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
      "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "2022 advisory-opinion comment, PDF p9 signature: Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder. Role evidence, not ownership.",
      "note": "2022 advisory-opinion comment, PDF p9 signature: Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder. Role evidence, not ownership.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-nelson",
        "title": "Josh Nelson: signed FEC comment",
        "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf",
        "readScope": "2022 advisory-opinion comment, PDF p9 signature: Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder. Role evidence, not ownership.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-civic_company",
      "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
      "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Public company posts about Nelson leadership and Joint Actions staffing; relative post dates not converted into invented exact dates.",
      "note": "Public company posts about Nelson leadership and Joint Actions staffing; relative post dates not converted into invented exact dates.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-civic_company",
        "title": "Civic Shout: public company account",
        "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout",
        "readScope": "Public company posts about Nelson leadership and Joint Actions staffing; relative post dates not converted into invented exact dates.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-golden",
      "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
      "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder, 2016–2018. Read through web; direct download403. No current equity ownership established.",
      "note": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder, 2016–2018. Read through web; direct download403. No current equity ownership established.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-golden",
        "title": "Elliott Golden: professional résumé",
        "url": "https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden",
        "readScope": "Self-reported Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder, 2016–2018. Read through web; direct download403. No current equity ownership established.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-action",
      "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
      "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Separate progressive-action newsletter website/archive. No ultimate owner identified; not Collective Shout.",
      "note": "Separate progressive-action newsletter website/archive. No ultimate owner identified; not Collective Shout.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-action",
        "title": "Action Collective: public newsletter",
        "url": "https://youractioncollective.com/",
        "readScope": "Separate progressive-action newsletter website/archive. No ultimate owner identified; not Collective Shout.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-collective",
      "title": "Collective Shout: team roster",
      "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Public named team compared with identified Civic Shout personnel. No shared named leader found; bounded comparison, not universal independence proof.",
      "note": "Public named team compared with identified Civic Shout personnel. No shared named leader found; bounded comparison, not universal independence proof.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-collective",
        "title": "Collective Shout: team roster",
        "url": "https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team",
        "readScope": "Public named team compared with identified Civic Shout personnel. No shared named leader found; bounded comparison, not universal independence proof.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-collective_abr",
      "title": "Collective Shout: Australian Business Register",
      "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED; ABN 30162159097/ACN 162159097, Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Current registry reading.",
      "note": "COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED; ABN 30162159097/ACN 162159097, Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Current registry reading.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-collective_abr",
        "title": "Collective Shout: Australian Business Register",
        "url": "https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097",
        "readScope": "COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED; ABN 30162159097/ACN 162159097, Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Current registry reading.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-civic-s-frame",
      "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
      "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Org-edited Grants Received block updated 13 July 2026: Jaan Tallin (DAF) USD 20,000; AISTOF USD 280,000; another hidden AISTOF amount. Singh public reply assigns 280k to Cohort 1.0. Direct public HTML saved after web reader failure; no private comments read. DAF identity, payment dates and contracts unknown.",
      "note": "Org-edited Grants Received block updated 13 July 2026: Jaan Tallin (DAF) USD 20,000; AISTOF USD 280,000; another hidden AISTOF amount. Singh public reply assigns 280k to Cohort 1.0. Direct public HTML saved after web reader failure; no private comments read. DAF identity, payment dates and contracts unknown.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-civic-s-frame",
        "title": "Frame Fellowship: public recipient funding disclosure",
        "url": "https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d",
        "readScope": "Org-edited Grants Received block updated 13 July 2026: Jaan Tallin (DAF) USD 20,000; AISTOF USD 280,000; another hidden AISTOF amount. Singh public reply assigns 280k to Cohort 1.0. Direct public HTML saved after web reader failure; no private comments read. DAF identity, payment dates and contracts unknown.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-role",
      "title": "Meta governance roster",
      "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx",
      "publisher": "Meta Platforms",
      "kind": "issuer governance record",
      "locator": "Current issuer governance roster: Marc Andreessen's directorship since June 2008, a16z general-partner role since July 2009, and Risk & Strategy Committee membership. Current roster, not proof of any particular board vote.",
      "note": "Current issuer governance roster: Marc Andreessen's directorship since June 2008, a16z general-partner role since July 2009, and Risk & Strategy Committee membership. Current roster, not proof of any particular board vote.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-role",
        "title": "Meta governance roster",
        "url": "https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx",
        "readScope": "Current issuer governance roster: Marc Andreessen's directorship since June 2008, a16z general-partner role since July 2009, and Risk & Strategy Committee membership. Current roster, not proof of any particular board vote.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-charter",
      "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
      "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf",
      "publisher": "Meta Platforms",
      "kind": "issuer governance document",
      "locator": "Both pages of charter effective 1 June 2025: committee review/recommendation functions, adviser appointment authority, board discretion and membership removal. Does not establish unilateral director control or a new legal obligation by the charter alone.",
      "note": "Both pages of charter effective 1 June 2025: committee review/recommendation functions, adviser appointment authority, board discretion and membership removal. Does not establish unilateral director control or a new legal obligation by the charter alone.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-charter",
        "title": "Meta Risk & Strategy charter, effective 2025-06-01",
        "url": "https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf",
        "readScope": "Both pages of charter effective 1 June 2025: committee review/recommendation functions, adviser appointment authority, board discretion and membership removal. Does not establish unilateral director control or a new legal obligation by the charter alone.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-rfa",
      "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
      "kind": "FEC filing",
      "locator": "Right for America October quarterly report filed 15 October 2024, printed p6: Marc Andreessen, $2,500,000 received 24 July 2024, transaction SA11A.12495; employer A16Z. One receipt, not comprehensive personal giving.",
      "note": "Right for America October quarterly report filed 15 October 2024, printed p6: Marc Andreessen, $2,500,000 received 24 July 2024, transaction SA11A.12495; employer A16Z. One receipt, not comprehensive personal giving.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-rfa",
        "title": "Right for America Q3 2024 filing, p6",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf",
        "readScope": "Right for America October quarterly report filed 15 October 2024, printed p6: Marc Andreessen, $2,500,000 received 24 July 2024, transaction SA11A.12495; employer A16Z. One receipt, not comprehensive personal giving.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-fairshake",
      "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
      "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "donor disclosure",
      "locator": "Donor statement dated 18 December 2023, May and August 2024 updates: $47m firm aggregate to Fairshake/associated PACs; ownership memo entries non-additive; donor disclaims control of spending. Not a September 2026 receipts audit.",
      "note": "Donor statement dated 18 December 2023, May and August 2024 updates: $47m firm aggregate to Fairshake/associated PACs; ownership memo entries non-additive; donor disclaims control of spending. Not a September 2026 receipts audit.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-fairshake",
        "title": "Contributing to Fairshake; May/August 2024 updates",
        "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac",
        "readScope": "Donor statement dated 18 December 2023, May and August 2024 updates: $47m firm aggregate to Fairshake/associated PACs; ownership memo entries non-additive; donor disclaims control of spending. Not a September 2026 receipts audit.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-fairshake26",
      "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
      "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "donor announcement",
      "locator": "Chris Dixon's 4 November 2024 announcement of more than $23m additional firm support for 2026-cycle Fairshake/affiliated PACs, plus meetings and entrepreneur introductions. Announcement not independently reconciled to receipts.",
      "note": "Chris Dixon's 4 November 2024 announcement of more than $23m additional firm support for 2026-cycle Fairshake/affiliated PACs, plus meetings and entrepreneur introductions. Announcement not independently reconciled to receipts.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-fairshake26",
        "title": "A long-term view of crypto policy, 2024-11-04",
        "url": "https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/",
        "readScope": "Chris Dixon's 4 November 2024 announcement of more than $23m additional firm support for 2026-cycle Fairshake/affiliated PACs, plus meetings and entrepreneur introductions. Announcement not independently reconciled to receipts.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-machine",
      "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "fund manager announcement",
      "locator": "28 August 2026 manager announcement: $1.1bn fundraise and physical AI scope; first Anduril investment in 2019. Fundraising not deployed capital; overlap with January's funds not reconciled.",
      "note": "28 August 2026 manager announcement: $1.1bn fundraise and physical AI scope; first Anduril investment in 2019. Fundraising not deployed capital; overlap with January's funds not reconciled.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-machine",
        "title": "Machine Age Fund, 2026-08-28",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/",
        "readScope": "28 August 2026 manager announcement: $1.1bn fundraise and physical AI scope; first Anduril investment in 2019. Fundraising not deployed capital; overlap with January's funds not reconciled.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-volta",
      "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "investor announcement",
      "locator": "4 August 2026 investor announcement: a16z co-leads Series A; business model combines cloud operations/project finance to address compute access. Check size, contracts and achieved capacity not disclosed.",
      "note": "4 August 2026 investor announcement: a16z co-leads Series A; business model combines cloud operations/project finance to address compute access. Check size, contracts and achieved capacity not disclosed.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-volta",
        "title": "Investing in Volta, 2026-08-04",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/",
        "readScope": "4 August 2026 investor announcement: a16z co-leads Series A; business model combines cloud operations/project finance to address compute access. Check size, contracts and achieved capacity not disclosed.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-openai",
      "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/",
      "publisher": "OpenAI",
      "kind": "recipient announcement",
      "locator": "31 March 2026 recipient release: a16z named co-lead; $122bn whole-round committed capital; approximately $4.7bn credit facility undrawn at close. No a16z-specific check or governance rights disclosed.",
      "note": "31 March 2026 recipient release: a16z named co-lead; $122bn whole-round committed capital; approximately $4.7bn credit facility undrawn at close. No a16z-specific check or governance rights disclosed.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-openai",
        "title": "OpenAI financing, 2026-03-31",
        "url": "https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/",
        "readScope": "31 March 2026 recipient release: a16z named co-lead; $122bn whole-round committed capital; approximately $4.7bn credit facility undrawn at close. No a16z-specific check or governance rights disclosed.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-anduril",
      "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
      "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/",
      "publisher": "Anduril Industries",
      "kind": "recipient announcement",
      "locator": "17 June 2021 recipient announcement: a16z and Founders Fund participants in $450m Series D led by Elad Gil. Historical co-investment, neither investor's check or rights stated.",
      "note": "17 June 2021 recipient announcement: a16z and Founders Fund participants in $450m Series D led by Elad Gil. Historical co-investment, neither investor's check or rights stated.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-anduril",
        "title": "Anduril Series D, 2021-06-17",
        "url": "https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/",
        "readScope": "17 June 2021 recipient announcement: a16z and Founders Fund participants in $450m Series D led by Elad Gil. Historical co-investment, neither investor's check or rights stated.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-anduril-openai",
      "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
      "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s",
      "publisher": "Anduril Industries",
      "kind": "party announcement",
      "locator": "4 December 2024 party announcement: proposed Lattice/model/CUAS-data collaboration, training and decision-support objectives, oversight assurances. Not complete contract or independent deployment evidence.",
      "note": "4 December 2024 party announcement: proposed Lattice/model/CUAS-data collaboration, training and decision-support objectives, oversight assurances. Not complete contract or independent deployment evidence.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-anduril-openai",
        "title": "Anduril-OpenAI partnership, 2024-12-04",
        "url": "https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s",
        "readScope": "4 December 2024 party announcement: proposed Lattice/model/CUAS-data collaboration, training and decision-support objectives, oversight assurances. Not complete contract or independent deployment evidence.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-ostp",
      "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
      "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "submitted policy document",
      "locator": "15-page AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission dated 14 March 2025: federal preemption of state model-development restrictions; harmful-use enforcement; disclosures; compute/talent; permission for government reuse without attribution. Submitted proposal, not enacted law.",
      "note": "15-page AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission dated 14 March 2025: federal preemption of state model-development restrictions; harmful-use enforcement; disclosures; compute/talent; permission for government reuse without attribution. Submitted proposal, not enacted law.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-ostp",
        "title": "AH Capital Management OSTP submission, 2025-03-14",
        "url": "https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf",
        "readScope": "15-page AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission dated 14 March 2025: federal preemption of state model-development restrictions; harmful-use enforcement; disclosures; compute/talent; permission for government reuse without attribution. Submitted proposal, not enacted law.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-microsoft",
      "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "joint policy statement",
      "locator": "Joint 1 November 2024 statement coauthored by Andreessen, Horowitz, Nadella and Smith: AI policy collaboration across startup and incumbent firms. Not a binding contract or comprehensive alignment.",
      "note": "Joint 1 November 2024 statement coauthored by Andreessen, Horowitz, Nadella and Smith: AI policy collaboration across startup and incumbent firms. Not a binding contract or comprehensive alignment.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-microsoft",
        "title": "AI for Startups, 2024-11-01",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/",
        "readScope": "Joint 1 November 2024 statement coauthored by Andreessen, Horowitz, Nadella and Smith: AI policy collaboration across startup and incumbent firms. Not a binding contract or comprehensive alignment.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-palantir",
      "title": "Palantir issuer release, 2024-11-07",
      "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations",
      "publisher": "Palantir Technologies via Business Wire",
      "kind": "issuer press release",
      "locator": "Palantir issuer release distributed 7 November 2024: Claude accessible that month in AIP on AWS, including IL6 environment. Historical integration; current contract status after later disputes not established.",
      "note": "Palantir issuer release distributed 7 November 2024: Claude accessible that month in AIP on AWS, including IL6 environment. Historical integration; current contract status after later disputes not established.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-palantir",
        "title": "Palantir issuer release, 2024-11-07",
        "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations",
        "readScope": "Palantir issuer release distributed 7 November 2024: Claude accessible that month in AIP on AWS, including IL6 environment. Historical integration; current contract status after later disputes not established.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-defense",
      "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "advocacy campaign",
      "locator": "Undated current advocacy page read 12 September 2026: named NDAA sections for commercial acquisition, workforce and munitions/autonomy. Exact bill-year and final enactment not audited.",
      "note": "Undated current advocacy page read 12 September 2026: named NDAA sections for commercial acquisition, workforce and munitions/autonomy. Exact bill-year and final enactment not audited.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-defense",
        "title": "a16z Defense Reform campaign, undated",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/defense-reform/",
        "readScope": "Undated current advocacy page read 12 September 2026: named NDAA sections for commercial acquisition, workforce and munitions/autonomy. Exact bill-year and final enactment not audited.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-anthropic",
      "title": "Anthropic Public First Action disclosure, 2026-07-21",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "donor disclosure",
      "locator": "21 July 2026 donor disclosure: $40m total Public First Action support; both grants restricted to public education/policy, excluding candidate-election influence. US Public First Action, not UK Public First consultancy; not independent payment audit.",
      "note": "21 July 2026 donor disclosure: $40m total Public First Action support; both grants restricted to public education/policy, excluding candidate-election influence. US Public First Action, not UK Public First consultancy; not independent payment audit.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-anthropic",
        "title": "Anthropic Public First Action disclosure, 2026-07-21",
        "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action",
        "readScope": "21 July 2026 donor disclosure: $40m total Public First Action support; both grants restricted to public education/policy, excluding candidate-election influence. US Public First Action, not UK Public First consultancy; not independent payment audit.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-funds",
      "title": "a16z fundraise, 2026-01-09",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "fund manager announcement",
      "locator": "9 January 2026 manager announcement: more than $15bn raised, with American Dynamism, Infrastructure, Growth and other fund groups. Fundraising is not personal political giving or completed deployment.",
      "note": "9 January 2026 manager announcement: more than $15bn raised, with American Dynamism, Infrastructure, Growth and other fund groups. Fundraising is not personal political giving or completed deployment.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-funds",
        "title": "a16z fundraise, 2026-01-09",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/",
        "readScope": "9 January 2026 manager announcement: more than $15bn raised, with American Dynamism, Infrastructure, Growth and other fund groups. Fundraising is not personal political giving or completed deployment.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-essay",
      "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "personal essay",
      "locator": "Marc Andreessen's 6 June 2023 essay: advocated development and diffusion, US technological predominance and defensive uses; rejected AI-takeover fears. Personal arguments, not empirical validation.",
      "note": "Marc Andreessen's 6 June 2023 essay: advocated development and diffusion, US technological predominance and defensive uses; rejected AI-takeover fears. Personal arguments, not empirical validation.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-essay",
        "title": "Why AI Will Save the World, 2023-06-06",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/",
        "readScope": "Marc Andreessen's 6 June 2023 essay: advocated development and diffusion, US technological predominance and defensive uses; rejected AI-takeover fears. Personal arguments, not empirical validation.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-manifesto",
      "title": "Techno-Optimist Manifesto, 2023-10-16",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "personal essay",
      "locator": "16 October 2023 personal manifesto, especially 'The Enemy': criticism of existential-risk and precautionary thinking. Ideological position, not evidence of a funding/control relationship with safety organizations.",
      "note": "16 October 2023 personal manifesto, especially 'The Enemy': criticism of existential-risk and precautionary thinking. Ideological position, not evidence of a funding/control relationship with safety organizations.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-manifesto",
        "title": "Techno-Optimist Manifesto, 2023-10-16",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/",
        "readScope": "16 October 2023 personal manifesto, especially 'The Enemy': criticism of existential-risk and precautionary thinking. Ideological position, not evidence of a funding/control relationship with safety organizations.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-little-tech",
      "title": "Little Tech Agenda, 2024-07-05",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "coauthored political statement",
      "locator": "Andreessen/Horowitz statement, 5 July 2024: declared issue-based startup political agenda across parties. Stated priority, not an audit of subsequent allocation.",
      "note": "Andreessen/Horowitz statement, 5 July 2024: declared issue-based startup political agenda across parties. Stated priority, not an audit of subsequent allocation.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-little-tech",
        "title": "Little Tech Agenda, 2024-07-05",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/",
        "readScope": "Andreessen/Horowitz statement, 5 July 2024: declared issue-based startup political agenda across parties. Stated priority, not an audit of subsequent allocation.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-ltf2025",
      "title": "Leading the Future January 2026 filing",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
      "kind": "Primary public record; prior corpus review",
      "locator": "Prior reviewed corpus e144/e145/e146: $25m a16z receipt 22 August 2025 and separate Greg/Anna Brockman receipts. Reused through existing reviewed graph; underlying filing not re-audited in Marc pass.",
      "note": "Prior reviewed corpus e144/e145/e146: $25m a16z receipt 22 August 2025 and separate Greg/Anna Brockman receipts. Reused through existing reviewed graph; underlying filing not re-audited in Marc pass.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-ltf2025",
        "title": "Leading the Future January 2026 filing",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf",
        "readScope": "Prior reviewed corpus e144/e145/e146: $25m a16z receipt 22 August 2025 and separate Greg/Anna Brockman receipts. Reused through existing reviewed graph; underlying filing not re-audited in Marc pass.",
        "state": "prior-review-reused",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-marc-s-ltf2026",
      "title": "Leading the Future Q1 2026 filing",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf",
      "publisher": "Federal Election Commission",
      "kind": "Primary public record; prior corpus review",
      "locator": "Prior reviewed corpus e144 and w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig: $25m a16z receipt 11 February 2026; $5m Think Big transfer 24 February 2026. Existing facts only; no new duplicate money edges.",
      "note": "Prior reviewed corpus e144 and w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig: $25m a16z receipt 11 February 2026; $5m Think Big transfer 24 February 2026. Existing facts only; no new duplicate money edges.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-marc-s-ltf2026",
        "title": "Leading the Future Q1 2026 filing",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf",
        "readScope": "Prior reviewed corpus e144 and w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig: $25m a16z receipt 11 February 2026; $5m Think Big transfer 24 February 2026. Existing facts only; no new duplicate money edges.",
        "state": "prior-review-reused",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-proxy",
      "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
      "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "SEC accession 0001321655-26-000019; record date April 6; Voting Structure and Arrangements pp16–17; board biographies; beneficial ownership is not present voting power.",
      "note": "SEC accession 0001321655-26-000019; record date April 6; Voting Structure and Arrangements pp16–17; board biographies; beneficial ownership is not present voting power.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-proxy",
        "title": "Palantir 2026 DEF 14A",
        "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm",
        "readScope": "SEC accession 0001321655-26-000019; record date April 6; Voting Structure and Arrangements pp16–17; board biographies; beneficial ownership is not present voting power.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-10q",
      "title": "Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q",
      "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Quarter ended June30; CIK1321655; government revenue; founder voting risk; cloud dependencies; government termination/order rights.",
      "note": "Quarter ended June30; CIK1321655; government revenue; founder voting risk; cloud dependencies; government termination/order rights.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-10q",
        "title": "Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q",
        "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm",
        "readScope": "Quarter ended June30; CIK1321655; government revenue; founder voting risk; cloud dependencies; government termination/order rights.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-army-ea",
      "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
      "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Up to ten years, $10bn maximum; explicitly not obligations or commitments.",
      "note": "Up to ten years, $10bn maximum; explicitly not obligations or commitments.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-army-ea",
        "title": "Army enterprise agreement announcement",
        "url": "https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency",
        "readScope": "Up to ten years, $10bn maximum; explicitly not obligations or commitments.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-maven-2024",
      "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
      "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "W911QX-24-D-0012; $480m; one bid; funding determined with each order.",
      "note": "W911QX-24-D-0012; $480m; one bid; funding determined with each order.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-maven-2024",
        "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype",
        "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/",
        "readScope": "W911QX-24-D-0012; $480m; one bid; funding determined with each order.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-maven-2025",
      "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
      "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Awarded May20; P00005; $795m additional capacity; funding determined per order; completion May28 2029.",
      "note": "Awarded May20; P00005; $795m additional capacity; funding determined per order; completion May28 2029.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-maven-2025",
        "title": "DoD contract announcement: Maven modification",
        "url": "https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/",
        "readScope": "Awarded May20; P00005; $795m additional capacity; funding determined per order; completion May28 2029.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-titan",
      "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
      "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Orders as of Aug31; Palantir $127m; Anduril $65m; eight systems over18months; not disbursement data.",
      "note": "Orders as of Aug31; Palantir $127m; Anduril $65m; eight systems over18months; not disbursement data.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-titan",
        "title": "Army announces TITAN production",
        "url": "https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/",
        "readScope": "Orders as of Aug31; Palantir $127m; Anduril $65m; eight systems over18months; not disbursement data.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-ms",
      "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
      "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Azure OpenAI integration announcement; availability subject to government authorization/accreditation; not direct OpenAI-Palantir agreement.",
      "note": "Azure OpenAI integration announcement; availability subject to government authorization/accreditation; not direct OpenAI-Palantir agreement.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-ms",
        "title": "Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership",
        "url": "https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/",
        "readScope": "Azure OpenAI integration announcement; availability subject to government authorization/accreditation; not direct OpenAI-Palantir agreement.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-claude",
      "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
      "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Company-issued release; Claude3/3.5 via AIP/SageMaker/IL6; historical deployment announcement, no equity/control terms.",
      "note": "Company-issued release; Claude3/3.5 via AIP/SageMaker/IL6; historical deployment announcement, no equity/control terms.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-claude",
        "title": "Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS",
        "url": "https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations",
        "readScope": "Company-issued release; Claude3/3.5 via AIP/SageMaker/IL6; historical deployment announcement, no equity/control terms.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-fedramp",
      "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
      "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Observed Sep12 2026; certification since Nov19 2024; Rev5 ClassD High;20ATO/ATU letters; not IL6 or model-use endorsement.",
      "note": "Observed Sep12 2026; certification since Nov19 2024; Rev5 ClassD High;20ATO/ATU letters; not IL6 or model-use endorsement.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-fedramp",
        "title": "Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing",
        "url": "https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/",
        "readScope": "Observed Sep12 2026; certification since Nov19 2024; Rev5 ClassD High;20ATO/ATU letters; not IL6 or model-use endorsement.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-anduril",
      "title": "Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership",
      "url": "https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Company-issued BusinessWire release mirrored; proposed Lattice/Menace/AIP data and deployment pipeline.",
      "note": "Company-issued BusinessWire release mirrored; proposed Lattice/Menace/AIP data and deployment pipeline.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-anduril",
        "title": "Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership",
        "url": "https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security",
        "readScope": "Company-issued BusinessWire release mirrored; proposed Lattice/Menace/AIP data and deployment pipeline.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-nato",
      "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
      "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Acquisition finalized Mar25 2025; Allied Command Operations; no price in announcement.",
      "note": "Acquisition finalized Mar25 2025; Allied Command Operations; no price in announcement.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-nato",
        "title": "NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO",
        "url": "https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system",
        "readScope": "Acquisition finalized Mar25 2025; Allied Command Operations; no price in announcement.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-fec",
      "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
      "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Page150/327; individual page image202505029758922685; transactionF132.147400953; Karp $1m received Dec17 2024. Personal addresses omitted.",
      "note": "Page150/327; individual page image202505029758922685; transactionF132.147400953; Karp $1m received Dec17 2024. Personal addresses omitted.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-fec",
        "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form13",
        "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf",
        "readScope": "Page150/327; individual page image202505029758922685; transactionF132.147400953; Karp $1m received Dec17 2024. Personal addresses omitted.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-ld203",
      "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
      "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Registrant41400/400643940; RyanTaylor signature; separates employeePAC contributions from corporate ReaganFoundation gift; not total lobbying expenditure.",
      "note": "Registrant41400/400643940; RyanTaylor signature; separates employeePAC contributions from corporate ReaganFoundation gift; not total lobbying expenditure.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-ld203",
        "title": "Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203",
        "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/",
        "readScope": "Registrant41400/400643940; RyanTaylor signature; separates employeePAC contributions from corporate ReaganFoundation gift; not total lobbying expenditure.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-senate",
      "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
      "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Primary written testimony, not legislation or proof of authorship of enacted reform.",
      "note": "Primary written testimony, not legislation or proof of authorship of enacted reform.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-senate",
        "title": "Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement",
        "url": "https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf",
        "readScope": "Primary written testimony, not legislation or proof of authorship of enacted reform.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-book",
      "title": "Publisher: The Technological Republic",
      "url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Karp/Zamiska book description and publication facts; not a complete reading of the book.",
      "note": "Karp/Zamiska book description and publication facts; not a complete reading of the book.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-book",
        "title": "Publisher: The Technological Republic",
        "url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/",
        "readScope": "Karp/Zamiska book description and publication facts; not a complete reading of the book.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-a16z",
      "title": "Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Historical firm investment; exact investing legal entity, stake and control rights unspecified.",
      "note": "Historical firm investment; exact investing legal entity, stake and control rights unspecified.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-a16z",
        "title": "Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/",
        "readScope": "Historical firm investment; exact investing legal entity, stake and control rights unspecified.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-trae",
      "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
      "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Observed Sep12 2026; partner, Anduril executive chairman, former Palantir employee.",
      "note": "Observed Sep12 2026; partner, Anduril executive chairman, former Palantir employee.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-trae",
        "title": "Founders Fund: Trae Stephens",
        "url": "https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/",
        "readScope": "Observed Sep12 2026; partner, Anduril executive chairman, former Palantir employee.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-opinion",
      "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
      "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Primary judicial opinion mirrored by Justia;26-cv-01996-RFL; record-based findings and deployment-control boundary.",
      "note": "Primary judicial opinion mirrored by Justia;26-cv-01996-RFL; record-based findings and deployment-control boundary.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-opinion",
        "title": "Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket250",
        "url": "https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250",
        "readScope": "Primary judicial opinion mirrored by Justia;26-cv-01996-RFL; record-based findings and deployment-control boundary.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-relief",
      "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
      "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Primary four-page order; paragraphs9–14; vacatur, injunction, lawful provider transition explicitly preserved.",
      "note": "Primary four-page order; paragraphs9–14; vacatur, injunction, lawful provider transition explicitly preserved.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-relief",
        "title": "Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket251",
        "url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf",
        "readScope": "Primary four-page order; paragraphs9–14; vacatur, injunction, lawful provider transition explicitly preserved.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-dc",
      "title": "D.C. Circuit docket26-1049, consolidated26-1162",
      "url": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher or primary-document host",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Mirror last retrieved Sep3; response to Aug28 authorities letter; no merits disposition visible, not live PACER assurance.",
      "note": "Mirror last retrieved Sep3; response to Aug28 authorities letter; no merits disposition visible, not live PACER assurance.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-dc",
        "title": "D.C. Circuit docket26-1049, consolidated26-1162",
        "url": "https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049",
        "readScope": "Mirror last retrieved Sep3; response to Aug28 authorities letter; no merits disposition visible, not live PACER assurance.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-karp-s-legal-context",
      "title": "Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations",
      "url": "https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9",
      "publisher": "Jones Walker LLP",
      "kind": "Secondary legal commentary",
      "locator": "SECONDARY legal commentary: distinguishes section3252 from FASCSA41USC4713 direct review.",
      "note": "SECONDARY legal commentary: distinguishes section3252 from FASCSA41USC4713 direct review.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-karp-s-legal-context",
        "title": "Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations",
        "url": "https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9",
        "readScope": "SECONDARY legal commentary: distinguishes section3252 from FASCSA41USC4713 direct review.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-report",
      "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
      "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Funding: printed pages 40–41, PDF page 21, visually inspected. £4m three-year commitment plus matching up to £3m; self-reported grant-independence terms. Poll methodology identifies Public First UK. These are commitments described in a report published in 2025, not current cash receipts.",
      "note": "Funding: printed pages 40–41, PDF page 21, visually inspected. £4m three-year commitment plus matching up to £3m; self-reported grant-independence terms. Poll methodology identifies Public First UK. These are commitments described in a report published in 2025, not current cash receipts.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-report",
        "title": "CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025",
        "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf",
        "readScope": "Funding: printed pages 40–41, PDF page 21, visually inspected. £4m three-year commitment plus matching up to £3m; self-reported grant-independence terms. Poll methodology identifies Public First UK. These are commitments described in a report published in 2025, not current cash receipts.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-support",
      "title": "CLTR: support our work",
      "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Current organization statement that it does not receive government funding; unrestricted gifts and stated funder benefits including expert access, advocacy opportunities and events.",
      "note": "Current organization statement that it does not receive government funding; unrestricted gifts and stated funder benefits including expert access, advocacy opportunities and events.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-support",
        "title": "CLTR: support our work",
        "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/",
        "readScope": "Current organization statement that it does not receive government funding; unrestricted gifts and stated funder benefits including expert access, advocacy opportunities and events.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-identity",
      "title": "CLTR: about us and legal operator",
      "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/about/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Footer identifies Alpenglow Group Limited, company 12308171. Distinct from similarly named dissolved company 13365768.",
      "note": "Footer identifies Alpenglow Group Limited, company 12308171. Distinct from similarly named dissolved company 13365768.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-identity",
        "title": "CLTR: about us and legal operator",
        "url": "https://www.longtermresilience.org/about/",
        "readScope": "Footer identifies Alpenglow Group Limited, company 12308171. Distinct from similarly named dissolved company 13365768.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-submission",
      "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026; public architecture proposals, including Cabinet Office coordination, independent oversight and citizen deliberation. Recommendations, not enacted powers.",
      "note": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026; public architecture proposals, including Cabinet Office coordination, independent oversight and citizen deliberation. Recommendations, not enacted powers.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-submission",
        "title": "CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/",
        "readScope": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026; public architecture proposals, including Cabinet Office coordination, independent oversight and citizen deliberation. Recommendations, not enacted powers.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-index",
      "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Index identifies CLTR evidence as published 21 May 2026; distinct from 20 April submission date.",
      "note": "Index identifies CLTR evidence as published 21 May 2026; distinct from 20 April submission date.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-cltr-index",
        "title": "National Resilience Committee: written evidence index",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6",
        "readScope": "Index identifies CLTR evidence as published 21 May 2026; distinct from 20 April submission date.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-stipends",
      "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
      "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Published eligibility, signed agreements, regular meetings, contribution and alignment conditions, and termination provisions. No individual agreement or actual termination case obtained.",
      "note": "Published eligibility, signed agreements, regular meetings, contribution and alignment conditions, and termination provisions. No individual agreement or actual termination case obtained.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-stipends",
        "title": "PauseAI: volunteer stipends",
        "url": "https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends",
        "readScope": "Published eligibility, signed agreements, regular meetings, contribution and alignment conditions, and termination provisions. No individual agreement or actual termination case obtained.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w37-policy-s-microgrants",
      "title": "PauseAI: microgrants",
      "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants",
      "publisher": "Primary publisher",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Named approvers, grant letter and deliverables; reporting and completion affect future eligibility. Published process, not an awarded grant instrument.",
      "note": "Named approvers, grant letter and deliverables; reporting and completion affect future eligibility. Published process, not an awarded grant instrument.",
      "accessed": "2026-09-12",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w37-policy-s-microgrants",
        "title": "PauseAI: microgrants",
        "url": "https://pauseai.org/microgrants",
        "readScope": "Named approvers, grant letter and deliverables; reporting and completion affect future eligibility. Published process, not an awarded grant instrument.",
        "state": "read",
        "accessed": "2026-09-12"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-lda-q1",
      "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
      "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/",
      "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-04-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Q1 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD120,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; foreign-interest statement. Filing is self-report, not an audited transaction ledger.",
      "note": "Q1 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD120,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; foreign-interest statement. Filing is self-report, not an audited transaction ledger.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-lda-q1",
        "title": "Control AI US: 2026 first-quarter lobbying report",
        "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/",
        "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-04-17",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Q1 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD120,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; foreign-interest statement. Filing is self-report, not an audited transaction ledger.",
        "note": "Q1 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD120,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; foreign-interest statement. Filing is self-report, not an audited transaction ledger.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Q1 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD120,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; foreign-interest statement. Filing is self-report, not an audited transaction ledger."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-lda-q2",
      "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
      "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/",
      "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-07-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Q2 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD80,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; Secure Future Research interest.",
      "note": "Q2 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD80,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; Secure Future Research interest.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-lda-q2",
        "title": "Control AI US: 2026 second-quarter lobbying report",
        "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/",
        "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-07-17",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Q2 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD80,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; Secure Future Research interest.",
        "note": "Q2 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD80,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; Secure Future Research interest.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Q2 and Method A checkboxes; lines 13 and 16-19. USD80,000 rounded lobbying expense estimate; named lobbyists and chambers; Secure Future Research interest."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-lda-registration",
      "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
      "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/",
      "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-07-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Registration effective July1,2025; lines 10,12,14. Names Hernandez-Zapata and prior covered office. Foreign-entity entry lists Secure Future Research, USD25,000 contribution and 0% ownership; alternative statutory triggers do not identify a unique control mechanism.",
      "note": "Registration effective July1,2025; lines 10,12,14. Names Hernandez-Zapata and prior covered office. Foreign-entity entry lists Secure Future Research, USD25,000 contribution and 0% ownership; alternative statutory triggers do not identify a unique control mechanism.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-lda-registration",
        "title": "Control AI US: lobbying registration",
        "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/",
        "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-07-17",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Registration effective July1,2025; lines 10,12,14. Names Hernandez-Zapata and prior covered office. Foreign-entity entry lists Secure Future Research, USD25,000 contribution and 0% ownership; alternative statutory triggers do not identify a unique control mechanism.",
        "note": "Registration effective July1,2025; lines 10,12,14. Names Hernandez-Zapata and prior covered office. Foreign-entity entry lists Secure Future Research, USD25,000 contribution and 0% ownership; alternative statutory triggers do not identify a unique control mechanism.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Registration effective July1,2025; lines 10,12,14. Names Hernandez-Zapata and prior covered office. Foreign-entity entry lists Secure Future Research, USD25,000 contribution and 0% ownership; alternative statutory triggers do not identify a unique control mechanism."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-morrison-registration",
      "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
      "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/",
      "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-03-19",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Lines 3,7,10,12,14: self-employed consultant, named client, issue scope and Secure Future Research foreign-entity entry. USD5,000 contribution entry is not added to client expense totals.",
      "note": "Lines 3,7,10,12,14: self-employed consultant, named client, issue scope and Secure Future Research foreign-entity entry. USD5,000 contribution entry is not added to client expense totals.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-morrison-registration",
        "title": "Nathan Morrison: registration for Control AI US",
        "url": "https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/",
        "publisher": "US LDA public filing system",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-03-19",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Lines 3,7,10,12,14: self-employed consultant, named client, issue scope and Secure Future Research foreign-entity entry. USD5,000 contribution entry is not added to client expense totals.",
        "note": "Lines 3,7,10,12,14: self-employed consultant, named client, issue scope and Secure Future Research foreign-entity entry. USD5,000 contribution entry is not added to client expense totals.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Lines 3,7,10,12,14: self-employed consultant, named client, issue scope and Secure Future Research foreign-entity entry. USD5,000 contribution entry is not added to client expense totals."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-sb813",
      "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
      "publisher": "California Legislature",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Chapter179, approved/filed September9. Government Code8898-8898.4 read: GovOps designation criteria, Jan2028 deadline, independence, funding, working groups, reports and voluntary-use limitation.",
      "note": "Chapter179, approved/filed September9. Government Code8898-8898.4 read: GovOps designation criteria, Jan2028 deadline, independence, funding, working groups, reports and voluntary-use limitation.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-sb813",
        "title": "California SB813 — chaptered law",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813",
        "publisher": "California Legislature",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-09",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Chapter179, approved/filed September9. Government Code8898-8898.4 read: GovOps designation criteria, Jan2028 deadline, independence, funding, working groups, reports and voluntary-use limitation.",
        "note": "Chapter179, approved/filed September9. Government Code8898-8898.4 read: GovOps designation criteria, Jan2028 deadline, independence, funding, working groups, reports and voluntary-use limitation.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Chapter179, approved/filed September9. Government Code8898-8898.4 read: GovOps designation criteria, Jan2028 deadline, independence, funding, working groups, reports and voluntary-use limitation."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-ab1405",
      "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405",
      "publisher": "California Legislature",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Chapter178, approved/filed September9. Government Code11549.80-11549.86: registry, January2029 covered-audit sales restriction, fees, standards, misconduct and accountancy route.",
      "note": "Chapter178, approved/filed September9. Government Code11549.80-11549.86: registry, January2029 covered-audit sales restriction, fees, standards, misconduct and accountancy route.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-ab1405",
        "title": "California AB1405 — chaptered law",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405",
        "publisher": "California Legislature",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-09",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Chapter178, approved/filed September9. Government Code11549.80-11549.86: registry, January2029 covered-audit sales restriction, fees, standards, misconduct and accountancy route.",
        "note": "Chapter178, approved/filed September9. Government Code11549.80-11549.86: registry, January2029 covered-audit sales restriction, fees, standards, misconduct and accountancy route.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Chapter178, approved/filed September9. Government Code11549.80-11549.86: registry, January2029 covered-audit sales restriction, fees, standards, misconduct and accountancy route."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-openai-policy",
      "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/",
      "publisher": "OpenAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Keeping up momentum in the states: explicit support for SB813 and AB1405. This establishes OpenAI advocacy, not authorship or appointment.",
      "note": "Keeping up momentum in the states: explicit support for SB813 and AB1405. This establishes OpenAI advocacy, not authorship or appointment.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-openai-policy",
        "title": "OpenAI endorses California auditor bills",
        "url": "https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/",
        "publisher": "OpenAI",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-09",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Keeping up momentum in the states: explicit support for SB813 and AB1405. This establishes OpenAI advocacy, not authorship or appointment.",
        "note": "Keeping up momentum in the states: explicit support for SB813 and AB1405. This establishes OpenAI advocacy, not authorship or appointment.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Keeping up momentum in the states: explicit support for SB813 and AB1405. This establishes OpenAI advocacy, not authorship or appointment."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-dario-pacing",
      "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
      "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier",
      "publisher": "Dario Amodei",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "September2026 heading; three-step plan and Embedded Evaluators/Pacing Within Democracies sections. METR is an example; no executed review contract obtained.",
      "note": "September2026 heading; three-step plan and Embedded Evaluators/Pacing Within Democracies sections. METR is an example; no executed review contract obtained.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-dario-pacing",
        "title": "Dario Amodei: We Must Pace the Frontier",
        "url": "https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier",
        "publisher": "Dario Amodei",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "September2026 heading; three-step plan and Embedded Evaluators/Pacing Within Democracies sections. METR is an example; no executed review contract obtained.",
        "note": "September2026 heading; three-step plan and Embedded Evaluators/Pacing Within Democracies sections. METR is an example; no executed review contract obtained.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "September2026 heading; three-step plan and Embedded Evaluators/Pacing Within Democracies sections. METR is an example; no executed review contract obtained."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-sb-effective",
      "title": "SB813 author: signing and January2027 effective date",
      "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/newsom-signs-mcnerneys-landmark-bill-assess-artificial-intelligence-safety-risks",
      "publisher": "California State Senate",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "locator": "Signing announcement and January1,2027 effective-date statement.",
      "note": "Primary sponsor announcement.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-sb-effective",
        "title": "SB813 author: signing and January2027 effective date",
        "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/newsom-signs-mcnerneys-landmark-bill-assess-artificial-intelligence-safety-risks",
        "publisher": "California State Senate",
        "published": "2026-09-09",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "locator": "Signing announcement and January1,2027 effective-date statement.",
        "note": "Primary sponsor announcement.",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-wells",
      "title": "Anika Wells: ABC Insiders interview, 13 September2026",
      "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers",
      "publisher": "Australian Minister for Communications",
      "published": "2026-09-13",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "kind": "Primary official transcript",
      "locator": "Speers question about Parliament deciding new harms and Wells reply; transcript date below body.",
      "note": "Successful extracted primary read retained by researcher; no original HTTP bytes captured. Conditional willingness to negotiate, not an agreed amendment.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-wells",
        "title": "Anika Wells: ABC Insiders interview, 13 September2026",
        "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers",
        "publisher": "Australian Minister for Communications",
        "published": "2026-09-13",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "kind": "Primary official transcript",
        "locator": "Speers question about Parliament deciding new harms and Wells reply; transcript date below body.",
        "note": "Successful extracted primary read retained by researcher; no original HTTP bytes captured. Conditional willingness to negotiate, not an agreed amendment.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Speers question about Parliament deciding new harms and Wells reply; transcript date below body."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-ca-effective-rule",
      "title": "California Constitution Article IV, section8",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=IV",
      "publisher": "California Legislature",
      "kind": "Primary constitutional text",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Section8(c)(1): ordinary effective date for non-urgency regular-session statutes.",
      "note": "Applied to the September2026 non-urgency chaptered laws; effective date is separate from implementation deadlines.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-ca-effective-rule",
        "title": "California Constitution Article IV, section8",
        "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=IV",
        "publisher": "California Legislature",
        "kind": "Primary constitutional text",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Section8(c)(1): ordinary effective date for non-urgency regular-session statutes.",
        "note": "Applied to the September2026 non-urgency chaptered laws; effective date is separate from implementation deadlines.",
        "state": "read"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w38-s-trump-ireland-ap",
      "title": "AP: Trump downplays AI slowdown calls in Ireland",
      "url": "https://apnews.com/article/9df0ebb4c1b0619aa0f88057b5a1092d",
      "publisher": "Associated Press",
      "kind": "Independent press report",
      "published": "2026-09-13",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Reported Sunday press exchange; accessible indexed article text. Original complete question and answer not recovered.",
      "note": "Attribution supports a reported public position; no executive order or formal decision on the specific lab proposal is established.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w38-s-trump-ireland-ap",
        "title": "AP: Trump downplays AI slowdown calls in Ireland",
        "url": "https://apnews.com/article/9df0ebb4c1b0619aa0f88057b5a1092d",
        "publisher": "Associated Press",
        "kind": "Independent press report",
        "published": "2026-09-13",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Reported Sunday press exchange; accessible indexed article text. Original complete question and answer not recovered.",
        "note": "Attribution supports a reported public position; no executive order or formal decision on the specific lab proposal is established.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Reported Sunday press exchange; accessible indexed article text. Original complete question and answer not recovered."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-a16z-grant",
      "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-06-26",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Named recipient and grant-not-investment description read. No recipient-specific amount or payment date disclosed.",
      "note": "Named recipient and grant-not-investment description read. No recipient-specific amount or payment date disclosed.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-a16z-grant",
        "title": "a16z announces Pliny in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/",
        "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-06-26",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Named recipient and grant-not-investment description read. No recipient-specific amount or payment date disclosed.",
        "note": "Named recipient and grant-not-investment description read. No recipient-specific amount or payment date disclosed.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Named recipient and grant-not-investment description read. No recipient-specific amount or payment date disclosed."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-time-pliny",
      "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
      "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/",
      "publisher": "TIME",
      "kind": "Journalistic reporting",
      "published": "2025-08-27",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Profile reports an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. Underlying agreements not obtained; possible overlap with the a16z announcement unresolved.",
      "note": "Profile reports an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. Underlying agreements not obtained; possible overlap with the a16z announcement unresolved.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-time-pliny",
        "title": "TIME100 AI 2025: Pliny the Liberator",
        "url": "https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/",
        "publisher": "TIME",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-08-27",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Profile reports an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. Underlying agreements not obtained; possible overlap with the a16z announcement unresolved.",
        "note": "Profile reports an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. Underlying agreements not obtained; possible overlap with the a16z announcement unresolved.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Profile reports an unrestricted Marc Andreessen grant and short-term OpenAI contracts. Underlying agreements not obtained; possible overlap with the a16z announcement unresolved."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-a16z-founders",
      "title": "About Andreessen Horowitz",
      "url": "https://a16z.com/about/",
      "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Firm identifies Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as founders in 2009.",
      "note": "Firm identifies Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as founders in 2009.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-a16z-founders",
        "title": "About Andreessen Horowitz",
        "url": "https://a16z.com/about/",
        "publisher": "Andreessen Horowitz",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Firm identifies Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as founders in 2009.",
        "note": "Firm identifies Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as founders in 2009.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Firm identifies Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as founders in 2009."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-pliny-projects",
      "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
      "url": "https://pliny.gg/",
      "publisher": "Pliny",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Project labels and destinations read: L1B3RT4S, CL4R1T4S, BT6 and BASI community. Instructions embedded in the page were treated as untrusted page content.",
      "note": "Project labels and destinations read: L1B3RT4S, CL4R1T4S, BT6 and BASI community. Instructions embedded in the page were treated as untrusted page content.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-pliny-projects",
        "title": "Pliny: public projects and community links",
        "url": "https://pliny.gg/",
        "publisher": "Pliny",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Project labels and destinations read: L1B3RT4S, CL4R1T4S, BT6 and BASI community. Instructions embedded in the page were treated as untrusted page content.",
        "note": "Project labels and destinations read: L1B3RT4S, CL4R1T4S, BT6 and BASI community. Instructions embedded in the page were treated as untrusted page content.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Project labels and destinations read: L1B3RT4S, CL4R1T4S, BT6 and BASI community. Instructions embedded in the page were treated as untrusted page content."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-latent-interview",
      "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
      "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator",
      "publisher": "Latent Space",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-12-16",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Host description and timestamped topic index read, including 26:55 community segment. Describes both guests as BT6 leaders and their open-research position; no complete audio review claimed.",
      "note": "Host description and timestamped topic index read, including 26:55 community segment. Describes both guests as BT6 leaders and their open-research position; no complete audio review claimed.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-latent-interview",
        "title": "Jailbreaking AGI: Pliny and John V on BT6 and AI security",
        "url": "https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator",
        "publisher": "Latent Space",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-12-16",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Host description and timestamped topic index read, including 26:55 community segment. Describes both guests as BT6 leaders and their open-research position; no complete audio review claimed.",
        "note": "Host description and timestamped topic index read, including 26:55 community segment. Describes both guests as BT6 leaders and their open-research position; no complete audio review claimed.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Host description and timestamped topic index read, including 26:55 community segment. Describes both guests as BT6 leaders and their open-research position; no complete audio review claimed."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-john-roster",
      "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
      "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9",
      "publisher": "John V",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-09-12",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Dated self-published operator list includes Pliny, Philip Dursey, Joey Melo and Marco Figueroa. Does not supply employment contracts or ownership shares.",
      "note": "Dated self-published operator list includes Pliny, Philip Dursey, Joey Melo and Marco Figueroa. Does not supply employment contracts or ownership shares.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-john-roster",
        "title": "BT6: public operator list by John V",
        "url": "https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9",
        "publisher": "John V",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-09-12",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Dated self-published operator list includes Pliny, Philip Dursey, Joey Melo and Marco Figueroa. Does not supply employment contracts or ownership shares.",
        "note": "Dated self-published operator list includes Pliny, Philip Dursey, Joey Melo and Marco Figueroa. Does not supply employment contracts or ownership shares.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Dated self-published operator list includes Pliny, Philip Dursey, Joey Melo and Marco Figueroa. Does not supply employment contracts or ownership shares."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-lysios",
      "title": "Lysios: research mission",
      "url": "https://lysios.ai/",
      "publisher": "Lysios",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Organization description: independent research, adversarial testing, tooling, interpretability and openness. Current legal ownership not established by this page.",
      "note": "Organization description: independent research, adversarial testing, tooling, interpretability and openness. Current legal ownership not established by this page.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-lysios",
        "title": "Lysios: research mission",
        "url": "https://lysios.ai/",
        "publisher": "Lysios",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Organization description: independent research, adversarial testing, tooling, interpretability and openness. Current legal ownership not established by this page.",
        "note": "Organization description: independent research, adversarial testing, tooling, interpretability and openness. Current legal ownership not established by this page.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Organization description: independent research, adversarial testing, tooling, interpretability and openness. Current legal ownership not established by this page."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-operator",
      "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/",
      "publisher": "OpenAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-01-23",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "System-card acknowledgments identify Lysios LLC as a red-teaming organization. Credit establishes participation, not compensation or access to model weights.",
      "note": "System-card acknowledgments identify Lysios LLC as a red-teaming organization. Credit establishes participation, not compensation or access to model weights.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-operator",
        "title": "Operator System Card: external red-teaming acknowledgments",
        "url": "https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/",
        "publisher": "OpenAI",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-01-23",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "System-card acknowledgments identify Lysios LLC as a red-teaming organization. Credit establishes participation, not compensation or access to model weights.",
        "note": "System-card acknowledgments identify Lysios LLC as a red-teaming organization. Credit establishes participation, not compensation or access to model weights.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "System-card acknowledgments identify Lysios LLC as a red-teaming organization. Credit establishes participation, not compensation or access to model weights."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-deep-research",
      "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
      "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf",
      "publisher": "OpenAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-02-25",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Section5, printed page35, credits Lysios LLC. Cover dated February25,2025; later revisions mean this date does not date the first appearance of the acknowledgment.",
      "note": "Section5, printed page35, credits Lysios LLC. Cover dated February25,2025; later revisions mean this date does not date the first appearance of the acknowledgment.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-deep-research",
        "title": "Deep Research System Card: Lysios acknowledgment",
        "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/deep-research-system-card.pdf",
        "publisher": "OpenAI",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-02-25",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Section5, printed page35, credits Lysios LLC. Cover dated February25,2025; later revisions mean this date does not date the first appearance of the acknowledgment.",
        "note": "Section5, printed page35, credits Lysios LLC. Cover dated February25,2025; later revisions mean this date does not date the first appearance of the acknowledgment.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Section5, printed page35, credits Lysios LLC. Cover dated February25,2025; later revisions mean this date does not date the first appearance of the acknowledgment."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-trojai-panel",
      "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
      "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/",
      "publisher": "TrojAI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Organizer lists John Vaina as AI Red Team Specialist at Lysios and Marco Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla program manager.",
      "note": "Organizer lists John Vaina as AI Red Team Specialist at Lysios and Marco Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla program manager.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-trojai-panel",
        "title": "AI red teaming: insights from the front lines",
        "url": "https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/",
        "publisher": "TrojAI",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Organizer lists John Vaina as AI Red Team Specialist at Lysios and Marco Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla program manager.",
        "note": "Organizer lists John Vaina as AI Red Team Specialist at Lysios and Marco Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla program manager.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Organizer lists John Vaina as AI Red Team Specialist at Lysios and Marco Figueroa as 0DIN/Mozilla program manager."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-sans",
      "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
      "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit",
      "publisher": "SANS Institute",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-02-25",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Announcement for April20-21 summit identifies Pliny with BT6. Evidence of invitation and public professional recognition, not verified attendance.",
      "note": "Announcement for April20-21 summit identifies Pliny with BT6. Evidence of invitation and public professional recognition, not verified attendance.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-sans",
        "title": "SANS announces Pliny keynote",
        "url": "https://www.sans.org/blog/keynote-pliny-the-liberator-sans-ai-cybersecurity-summit",
        "publisher": "SANS Institute",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-02-25",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Announcement for April20-21 summit identifies Pliny with BT6. Evidence of invitation and public professional recognition, not verified attendance.",
        "note": "Announcement for April20-21 summit identifies Pliny with BT6. Evidence of invitation and public professional recognition, not verified attendance.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Announcement for April20-21 summit identifies Pliny with BT6. Evidence of invitation and public professional recognition, not verified attendance."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-basilisk-venom",
      "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
      "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom",
      "publisher": "0DIN",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-02-06",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Byline Marco Figueroa and Pliny. Authors interpret elicited DeepSeek behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion; no provider training logs or independent causal replication obtained.",
      "note": "Byline Marco Figueroa and Pliny. Authors interpret elicited DeepSeek behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion; no provider training logs or independent causal replication obtained.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-basilisk-venom",
        "title": "Poison in the Pipeline: Liberating Models with Basilisk Venom",
        "url": "https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom",
        "publisher": "0DIN",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-02-06",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Byline Marco Figueroa and Pliny. Authors interpret elicited DeepSeek behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion; no provider training logs or independent causal replication obtained.",
        "note": "Byline Marco Figueroa and Pliny. Authors interpret elicited DeepSeek behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion; no provider training logs or independent causal replication obtained.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Byline Marco Figueroa and Pliny. Authors interpret elicited DeepSeek behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion; no provider training logs or independent causal replication obtained."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-pangea",
      "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
      "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/",
      "publisher": "Pangea",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-04-18",
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Organizer names Melo overall winner and top scorer in all three rooms of its $10,000 challenge. Prize schedule is not a payment receipt.",
      "note": "Organizer names Melo overall winner and top scorer in all three rooms of its $10,000 challenge. Prize schedule is not a payment receipt.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-pangea",
        "title": "Pangea identifies Joey Melo as AI challenge winner",
        "url": "https://pangea.cloud/blog/ethical-hackers-mindset-leads-to-victory-in-pangea-ai-challenge/",
        "publisher": "Pangea",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-04-18",
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Organizer names Melo overall winner and top scorer in all three rooms of its $10,000 challenge. Prize schedule is not a payment receipt.",
        "note": "Organizer names Melo overall winner and top scorer in all three rooms of its $10,000 challenge. Prize schedule is not a payment receipt.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Organizer names Melo overall winner and top scorer in all three rooms of its $10,000 challenge. Prize schedule is not a payment receipt."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w39-s-dursey-book",
      "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
      "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829",
      "publisher": "No Starch Press",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-13",
      "locator": "Search-indexed publisher excerpt names Philip A. Dursey as author and founder/CEO of HYPERGAME. Full publisher page unavailable in this pass; no release date or sales claim adopted.",
      "note": "Search-indexed publisher excerpt names Philip A. Dursey as author and founder/CEO of HYPERGAME. Full publisher page unavailable in this pass; no release date or sales claim adopted.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w39-s-dursey-book",
        "title": "Red Teaming AI: publisher author biography",
        "url": "https://nostarch.com/node/829",
        "publisher": "No Starch Press",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-13",
        "locator": "Search-indexed publisher excerpt names Philip A. Dursey as author and founder/CEO of HYPERGAME. Full publisher page unavailable in this pass; no release date or sales claim adopted.",
        "note": "Search-indexed publisher excerpt names Philip A. Dursey as author and founder/CEO of HYPERGAME. Full publisher page unavailable in this pass; no release date or sales claim adopted.",
        "state": "excerpt read",
        "readScope": "Search-indexed publisher excerpt names Philip A. Dursey as author and founder/CEO of HYPERGAME. Full publisher page unavailable in this pass; no release date or sales claim adopted."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-s-elsayed-platform",
      "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
      "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/",
      "publisher": "Abdul El-Sayed campaign",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-06-29",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Sections1-3 read. Proposed majority public board representation, divestiture, public ownership, independent testing and compute traceability. Campaign proposal, not law.",
      "note": "Sections1-3 read. Proposed majority public board representation, divestiture, public ownership, independent testing and compute traceability. Campaign proposal, not law.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-s-elsayed-platform",
        "title": "AI Under Democracy — campaign platform",
        "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/",
        "publisher": "Abdul El-Sayed campaign",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-06-29",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Sections1-3 read. Proposed majority public board representation, divestiture, public ownership, independent testing and compute traceability. Campaign proposal, not law.",
        "note": "Sections1-3 read. Proposed majority public board representation, divestiture, public ownership, independent testing and compute traceability. Campaign proposal, not law.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Sections1-3 read. Proposed majority public board representation, divestiture, public ownership, independent testing and compute traceability. Campaign proposal, not law."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-s-elsayed-launch",
      "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
      "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/",
      "publisher": "Abdul El-Sayed campaign",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-06-29",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Dated platform announcement and stated public-benefit rationale; explicitly supports the Sanders wealth-fund proposal.",
      "note": "Dated platform announcement and stated public-benefit rationale; explicitly supports the Sanders wealth-fund proposal.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-s-elsayed-launch",
        "title": "El-Sayed announces AI Under Democracy",
        "url": "https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/",
        "publisher": "Abdul El-Sayed campaign",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-06-29",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Dated platform announcement and stated public-benefit rationale; explicitly supports the Sanders wealth-fund proposal.",
        "note": "Dated platform announcement and stated public-benefit rationale; explicitly supports the Sanders wealth-fund proposal.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Dated platform announcement and stated public-benefit rationale; explicitly supports the Sanders wealth-fund proposal."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-s-sanders-announcement",
      "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-06-18",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Office announcement of introduction. Its $7trillion figure is a projected valuation, not an existing fund or disbursement. Enactment not established.",
      "note": "Office announcement of introduction. Its $7trillion figure is a projected valuation, not an existing fund or disbursement. Enactment not established.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-s-sanders-announcement",
        "title": "Sanders announces AI Sovereign Wealth Fund legislation",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-legislation-to-create-7-trillion-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund/",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-06-18",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Office announcement of introduction. Its $7trillion figure is a projected valuation, not an existing fund or disbursement. Enactment not established.",
        "note": "Office announcement of introduction. Its $7trillion figure is a projected valuation, not an existing fund or disbursement. Enactment not established.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Office announcement of introduction. Its $7trillion figure is a projected valuation, not an existing fund or disbursement. Enactment not established."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-s-wealth-fund-text",
      "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-06-18",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "38-page office-published draft MCG26575. Pages4-8 tax/remittance/scope, pages14-27 commission/rights/constraints. Cover has blank bill number and procedural fields; do not infer legislative passage.",
      "note": "38-page office-published draft MCG26575. Pages4-8 tax/remittance/scope, pages14-27 commission/rights/constraints. Cover has blank bill number and procedural fields; do not infer legislative passage.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-s-wealth-fund-text",
        "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office-published text",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAIWealthFundTextv618.pdf",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-06-18",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "38-page office-published draft MCG26575. Pages4-8 tax/remittance/scope, pages14-27 commission/rights/constraints. Cover has blank bill number and procedural fields; do not infer legislative passage.",
        "note": "38-page office-published draft MCG26575. Pages4-8 tax/remittance/scope, pages14-27 commission/rights/constraints. Cover has blank bill number and procedural fields; do not infer legislative passage.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "38-page office-published draft MCG26575. Pages4-8 tax/remittance/scope, pages14-27 commission/rights/constraints. Cover has blank bill number and procedural fields; do not infer legislative passage."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-s-wealth-fund-summary",
      "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-06-18",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Four-page proposal summary read; distinguishes projected assets, public equity and commission governance. Use legislative text for exact operation.",
      "note": "Four-page proposal summary read; distinguishes projected assets, public equity and commission governance. Use legislative text for exact operation.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-s-wealth-fund-summary",
        "title": "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — office summary",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-06-18",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Four-page proposal summary read; distinguishes projected assets, public equity and commission governance. Use legislative text for exact operation.",
        "note": "Four-page proposal summary read; distinguishes projected assets, public equity and commission governance. Use legislative text for exact operation.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Four-page proposal summary read; distinguishes projected assets, public equity and commission governance. Use legislative text for exact operation."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w40-s-elsayed-sunday",
      "title": "El-Sayed interview transcript, September13",
      "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/",
      "publisher": "CBS News",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-13",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "AI segment, lines127 onward in reader. Updated12:58pm EDT. Used to establish renewed public advocacy; policy details sourced to June campaign documents.",
      "note": "AI segment, lines127 onward in reader. Updated12:58pm EDT. Used to establish renewed public advocacy; policy details sourced to June campaign documents.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w40-s-elsayed-sunday",
        "title": "El-Sayed interview transcript, September13",
        "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/",
        "publisher": "CBS News",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-13",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "AI segment, lines127 onward in reader. Updated12:58pm EDT. Used to establish renewed public advocacy; policy details sourced to June campaign documents.",
        "note": "AI segment, lines127 onward in reader. Updated12:58pm EDT. Used to establish renewed public advocacy; policy details sourced to June campaign documents.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "AI segment, lines127 onward in reader. Updated12:58pm EDT. Used to establish renewed public advocacy; policy details sourced to June campaign documents."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-about",
      "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
      "url": "https://metr.org/about",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Partnerships, funding and staff sections read; contractual terms not disclosed.",
      "note": "Partnerships, funding and staff sections read; contractual terms not disclosed.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-about",
        "title": "METR: partnerships and funding",
        "url": "https://metr.org/about",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Partnerships, funding and staff sections read; contractual terms not disclosed.",
        "note": "Partnerships, funding and staff sections read; contractual terms not disclosed.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Partnerships, funding and staff sections read; contractual terms not disclosed."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-funding",
      "title": "METR funding update",
      "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-08-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Approximately $71m commitments over six months; supporter acknowledgments cover multiple years.",
      "note": "Approximately $71m commitments over six months; supporter acknowledgments cover multiple years.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-funding",
        "title": "METR funding update",
        "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-08-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Approximately $71m commitments over six months; supporter acknowledgments cover multiple years.",
        "note": "Approximately $71m commitments over six months; supporter acknowledgments cover multiple years.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Approximately $71m commitments over six months; supporter acknowledgments cover multiple years."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-canary",
      "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
      "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2024-10-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "About $38m for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Collective membership does not allocate donor contributions.",
      "note": "About $38m for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Collective membership does not allocate donor contributions.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-canary",
        "title": "New Support Through The Audacious Project",
        "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2024-10-09",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "About $38m for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Collective membership does not allocate donor contributions.",
        "note": "About $38m for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Collective membership does not allocate donor contributions.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "About $38m for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Collective membership does not allocate donor contributions."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-audacious",
      "title": "Canary grantee profile",
      "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand",
      "publisher": "The Audacious Project",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2024",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Project description, leads and evaluation-capacity objective.",
      "note": "Project description, leads and evaluation-capacity objective.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-audacious",
        "title": "Canary grantee profile",
        "url": "https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand",
        "publisher": "The Audacious Project",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2024",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Project description, leads and evaluation-capacity objective.",
        "note": "Project description, leads and evaluation-capacity objective.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Project description, leads and evaluation-capacity objective."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-rand",
      "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
      "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html",
      "publisher": "RAND",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Participants and evaluation programme read.",
      "note": "Participants and evaluation programme read.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-rand",
        "title": "Canary: Evaluating Frontier AI",
        "url": "https://www.rand.org/global-and-emerging-risks/centers/ai-security-and-technology/projects/canary.html",
        "publisher": "RAND",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Participants and evaluation programme read.",
        "note": "Participants and evaluation programme read.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Participants and evaluation programme read."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-spin",
      "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
      "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2023-12-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Currently published account of standalone nonprofit spin-off; not an immutable 2023 capture.",
      "note": "Currently published account of standalone nonprofit spin-off; not an immutable 2023 capture.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-spin",
        "title": "ARC Evals is now METR",
        "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2023-12-04",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Currently published account of standalone nonprofit spin-off; not an immutable 2023 capture.",
        "note": "Currently published account of standalone nonprofit spin-off; not an immutable 2023 capture.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Currently published account of standalone nonprofit spin-off; not an immutable 2023 capture."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-cotra",
      "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
      "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Current role and prior Coefficient Giving work read.",
      "note": "Current role and prior Coefficient Giving work read.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-cotra",
        "title": "Ajeya Cotra biography",
        "url": "https://metr.org/team/ajeya-cotra/",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Current role and prior Coefficient Giving work read.",
        "note": "Current role and prior Coefficient Giving work read.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Current role and prior Coefficient Giving work read."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-joe",
      "title": "Joe Benton biography",
      "url": "https://joejbenton.com/",
      "publisher": "Joe Benton",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Former Anthropic and UK taskforce roles; METR joining remains prospective.",
      "note": "Former Anthropic and UK taskforce roles; METR joining remains prospective.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-joe",
        "title": "Joe Benton biography",
        "url": "https://joejbenton.com/",
        "publisher": "Joe Benton",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Former Anthropic and UK taskforce roles; METR joining remains prospective.",
        "note": "Former Anthropic and UK taskforce roles; METR joining remains prospective.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Former Anthropic and UK taskforce roles; METR joining remains prospective."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-rsp",
      "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
      "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2023-09-26",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Introduction, conditions and regulatory-testbed discussion read.",
      "note": "Introduction, conditions and regulatory-testbed discussion read.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-rsp",
        "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies",
        "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/",
        "publisher": "METR",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2023-09-26",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Introduction, conditions and regulatory-testbed discussion read.",
        "note": "Introduction, conditions and regulatory-testbed discussion read.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Introduction, conditions and regulatory-testbed discussion read."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-gates",
      "title": "Making AI work for more people",
      "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership",
      "publisher": "Gates Foundation",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-05-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Joint four-year $200m programme and IHME collaboration.",
      "note": "Joint four-year $200m programme and IHME collaboration.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-gates",
        "title": "Making AI work for more people",
        "url": "https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership",
        "publisher": "Gates Foundation",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-05-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Joint four-year $200m programme and IHME collaboration.",
        "note": "Joint four-year $200m programme and IHME collaboration.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Joint four-year $200m programme and IHME collaboration."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-anthropic",
      "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-05-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Programme resources, IDM, health ministries and portable credentials; partner cash split undisclosed.",
      "note": "Programme resources, IDM, health ministries and portable credentials; partner cash split undisclosed.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-anthropic",
        "title": "Anthropic and Gates partnership",
        "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership",
        "publisher": "Anthropic",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-05-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Programme resources, IDM, health ministries and portable credentials; partner cash split undisclosed.",
        "note": "Programme resources, IDM, health ministries and portable credentials; partner cash split undisclosed.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Programme resources, IDM, health ministries and portable credentials; partner cash split undisclosed."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-uk",
      "title": "AI Security Institute parliamentary answer",
      "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/21384",
      "publisher": "UK Parliament",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-07",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Answer distinguishes research institute from regulator.",
      "note": "Answer distinguishes research institute from regulator.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-uk",
        "title": "AI Security Institute parliamentary answer",
        "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-08-28/21384",
        "publisher": "UK Parliament",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-07",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Answer distinguishes research institute from regulator.",
        "note": "Answer distinguishes research institute from regulator.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Answer distinguishes research institute from regulator."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-ban",
      "title": "ASI prohibition release summary",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "One-page summary read: alternative definitions, proposed agency and board. Not statutory text.",
      "note": "One-page summary read: alternative definitions, proposed agency and board. Not statutory text.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-ban",
        "title": "ASI prohibition release summary",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-03",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "One-page summary read: alternative definitions, proposed agency and board. Not statutory text.",
        "note": "One-page summary read: alternative definitions, proposed agency and board. Not statutory text.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "One-page summary read: alternative definitions, proposed agency and board. Not statutory text."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-announcement",
      "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/",
      "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Office describes forthcoming legislation; docket search recovered no introduced text; direct Congress access restricted.",
      "note": "Office describes forthcoming legislation; docket search recovered no introduced text; direct Congress access restricted.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-announcement",
        "title": "Sanders and Casar announce AI proposal",
        "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/",
        "publisher": "Senator Bernie Sanders",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-03",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Office describes forthcoming legislation; docket search recovered no introduced text; direct Congress access restricted.",
        "note": "Office describes forthcoming legislation; docket search recovered no introduced text; direct Congress access restricted.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Office describes forthcoming legislation; docket search recovered no introduced text; direct Congress access restricted."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-open",
      "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
      "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html",
      "publisher": "RAND",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-05-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Publication page and PDF printed iii,1-3 read: four approaches, proportionality, funding. Survey not replicated.",
      "note": "Publication page and PDF printed iii,1-3 read: four approaches, proportionality, funding. Survey not replicated.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-open",
        "title": "Open-Weight AI Models Require Proportional Evaluation Approaches",
        "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html",
        "publisher": "RAND",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-05-04",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Publication page and PDF printed iii,1-3 read: four approaches, proportionality, funding. Survey not replicated.",
        "note": "Publication page and PDF printed iii,1-3 read: four approaches, proportionality, funding. Survey not replicated.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Publication page and PDF printed iii,1-3 read: four approaches, proportionality, funding. Survey not replicated."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w41-s-ji",
      "title": "Bernie’s Anti-Oligarch Bill Was Written by the Oligarchs",
      "url": "https://sayerji.substack.com/p/bernies-anti-oligarch-bill-was-written",
      "publisher": "Sayer Ji",
      "kind": "Analysis and investigative lead",
      "published": "2026-09-12",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Attributed investigative lead checked against primary records.",
      "note": "Attributed investigative lead checked against primary records.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w41-s-ji",
        "title": "Bernie’s Anti-Oligarch Bill Was Written by the Oligarchs",
        "url": "https://sayerji.substack.com/p/bernies-anti-oligarch-bill-was-written",
        "publisher": "Sayer Ji",
        "kind": "Analysis and investigative lead",
        "published": "2026-09-12",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Attributed investigative lead checked against primary records.",
        "note": "Attributed investigative lead checked against primary records.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Attributed investigative lead checked against primary records."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-assembly",
      "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
      "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/",
      "publisher": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Public event listing read. September 15 date and advertised speakers; attendance has not occurred.",
      "note": "Public event listing read. September 15 date and advertised speakers; attendance has not occurred.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-assembly",
        "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: public event listing",
        "url": "https://secureainow.org/events/the-pro-human-assembly-2026/",
        "publisher": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Public event listing read. September 15 date and advertised speakers; attendance has not occurred.",
        "note": "Public event listing read. September 15 date and advertised speakers; attendance has not occurred.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Public event listing read. September 15 date and advertised speakers; attendance has not occurred."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-axios",
      "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
      "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai",
      "publisher": "Axios",
      "kind": "Reported news",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Historical morning observation: attendance claim superseded by w 42-s-axios-update. Original article text is retained in _raw; current organizer and participation claims use the later records.",
      "note": "Historical morning observation: attendance claim superseded by w 42-s-axios-update. Original article text is retained in _raw; current organizer and participation claims use the later records.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-axios",
        "title": "Coxon, Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI",
        "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai",
        "publisher": "Axios",
        "kind": "Reported news",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "News-service text read; FLI organizer role and Coxon/Sanders/Bannon participation are attributed to Axios, not independently confirmed by a primary announcement.",
        "note": "News-service text read; FLI organizer role and Coxon/Sanders/Bannon participation are attributed to Axios, not independently confirmed by a primary announcement.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "News-service text read; FLI organizer role and Coxon/Sanders/Bannon participation are attributed to Axios, not independently confirmed by a primary announcement."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-march",
      "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-03-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Dated coalition announcement and Bannon endorsement read. The record predates the September media surge.",
      "note": "Dated coalition announcement and Bannon endorsement read. The record predates the September media surge.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-march",
        "title": "Statement of shared principles on AI",
        "url": "https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/",
        "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-03-04",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Dated coalition announcement and Bannon endorsement read. The record predates the September media surge.",
        "note": "Dated coalition announcement and Bannon endorsement read. The record predates the September media surge.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Dated coalition announcement and Bannon endorsement read. The record predates the September media surge."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-declaration",
      "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
      "url": "https://humanstatement.org/",
      "publisher": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Current principles, organization and individual endorser lists read; individual signature dates not supplied. Supplemental statements qualify some endorsements.",
      "note": "Current principles, organization and individual endorser lists read; individual signature dates not supplied. Supplemental statements qualify some endorsements.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-declaration",
        "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration and endorsers",
        "url": "https://humanstatement.org/",
        "publisher": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Current principles, organization and individual endorser lists read; individual signature dates not supplied. Supplemental statements qualify some endorsements.",
        "note": "Current principles, organization and individual endorser lists read; individual signature dates not supplied. Supplemental statements qualify some endorsements.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Current principles, organization and individual endorser lists read; individual signature dates not supplied. Supplemental statements qualify some endorsements."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-china",
      "title": "Beijing challenges Anthropic CEO on China AI development",
      "url": "https://apnews.com/article/3da458d2c078da3e60900728d59f1ae8",
      "publisher": "Associated Press",
      "kind": "Reported news",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Earlier AP attribution retained; the official September 14 transcript is now available as w 42-s-mfa. It supports the stated position but contains no Chinese slowdown commitment.",
      "note": "Earlier AP attribution retained; the official September 14 transcript is now available as w 42-s-mfa. It supports the stated position but contains no Chinese slowdown commitment.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-china",
        "title": "Beijing challenges Anthropic CEO on China AI development",
        "url": "https://apnews.com/article/3da458d2c078da3e60900728d59f1ae8",
        "publisher": "Associated Press",
        "kind": "Reported news",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Wire report reviewed in independent research lane; Guo Jiakun remarks remain attributed to AP pending official September 14 MFA transcript. Root direct-open returned internal error.",
        "note": "Wire report reviewed in independent research lane; Guo Jiakun remarks remain attributed to AP pending official September 14 MFA transcript. Root direct-open returned internal error.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Wire report reviewed in independent research lane; Guo Jiakun remarks remain attributed to AP pending official September 14 MFA transcript. Root direct-open returned internal error."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-johnson",
      "title": "Political debate over AI intensifies",
      "url": "https://keyt.com/politics/cnn-us-politics/2026/09/13/political-debate-over-ai-intensifies-amid-warnings-about-catastrophic-risk/",
      "publisher": "CNN via KEYT",
      "kind": "Reported news",
      "published": "2026-09-13",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "CNN report on its State of the Union interview read; Johnson resisted emergency regulation and sought industry consultation.",
      "note": "CNN report on its State of the Union interview read; Johnson resisted emergency regulation and sought industry consultation.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-johnson",
        "title": "Political debate over AI intensifies",
        "url": "https://keyt.com/politics/cnn-us-politics/2026/09/13/political-debate-over-ai-intensifies-amid-warnings-about-catastrophic-risk/",
        "publisher": "CNN via KEYT",
        "kind": "Reported news",
        "published": "2026-09-13",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "CNN report on its State of the Union interview read; Johnson resisted emergency regulation and sought industry consultation.",
        "note": "CNN report on its State of the Union interview read; Johnson resisted emergency regulation and sought industry consultation.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "CNN report on its State of the Union interview read; Johnson resisted emergency regulation and sought industry consultation."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-google-ca",
      "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
      "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/",
      "publisher": "Google Canada",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Announcement substantive body read and HTML captured through ordinary HTTP200. Gradual rollout in coming days; no independent deployment or remedy test.",
      "note": "Announcement substantive body read and HTML captured through ordinary HTTP200. Gradual rollout in coming days; no independent deployment or remedy test.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-google-ca",
        "title": "Age assurance rollout in Canada",
        "url": "https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/",
        "publisher": "Google Canada",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Announcement substantive body read and HTML captured through ordinary HTTP200. Gradual rollout in coming days; no independent deployment or remedy test.",
        "note": "Announcement substantive body read and HTML captured through ordinary HTTP200. Gradual rollout in coming days; no independent deployment or remedy test.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Announcement substantive body read and HTML captured through ordinary HTTP200. Gradual rollout in coming days; no independent deployment or remedy test."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-google-us",
      "title": "Age assurance measures in the United States",
      "url": "https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/",
      "publisher": "Google",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-07-30",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Earlier US rollout announcement read in independent source lane; establishes the method predates Canadian expansion.",
      "note": "Earlier US rollout announcement read in independent source lane; establishes the method predates Canadian expansion.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-google-us",
        "title": "Age assurance measures in the United States",
        "url": "https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/",
        "publisher": "Google",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-07-30",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Earlier US rollout announcement read in independent source lane; establishes the method predates Canadian expansion.",
        "note": "Earlier US rollout announcement read in independent source lane; establishes the method predates Canadian expansion.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Earlier US rollout announcement read in independent source lane; establishes the method predates Canadian expansion."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-axios-update",
      "title": "Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI — corrected attendance report",
      "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai",
      "publisher": "Axios",
      "kind": "Reported news",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Updated news-service article text read at noon; timestamp 2026-09-14T15:48:03Z. Says Coxon and organizers told Axios he would not attend; editor correction explicitly noted. Direct page request returned 403. Earlier article observation retained as w 42-s-axios.",
      "note": "Updated news-service article text read at noon; timestamp 2026-09-14T15:48:03Z. Says Coxon and organizers told Axios he would not attend; editor correction explicitly noted. Direct page request returned 403. Earlier article observation retained as w 42-s-axios.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-axios-update",
        "title": "Bernie and Bannon unite for pro-human AI — corrected attendance report",
        "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai",
        "publisher": "Axios",
        "kind": "Reported news",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Updated news-service article text read at noon; timestamp 2026-09-14T15:48:03Z. Says Coxon and organizers told Axios he would not attend; editor correction explicitly noted. Direct page request returned403. Earlier article observation retained as w42-s-axios.",
        "note": "Updated news-service article text read at noon; timestamp 2026-09-14T15:48:03Z. Says Coxon and organizers told Axios he would not attend; editor correction explicitly noted. Direct page request returned403. Earlier article observation retained as w42-s-axios.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Updated news-service article text read at noon; timestamp 2026-09-14T15:48:03Z. Says Coxon and organizers told Axios he would not attend; editor correction explicitly noted. Direct page request returned403. Earlier article observation retained as w42-s-axios."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-assembly-home",
      "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer homepage",
      "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "Undated; accessed 2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Public homepage read and captured 14 September. Identifies FLI as presenter and still lists Coxon; conflicts with updated Axios account. Undated page, newly inspected; not proof of attendance.",
      "note": "Public homepage read and captured 14 September. Identifies FLI as presenter and still lists Coxon; conflicts with updated Axios account. Undated page, newly inspected; not proof of attendance.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-assembly-home",
        "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer homepage",
        "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/",
        "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "Undated; accessed2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Public homepage read and captured14September. Identifies FLI as presenter and still lists Coxon; conflicts with updated Axios account. Undated page, newly inspected; not proof of attendance.",
        "note": "Public homepage read and captured14September. Identifies FLI as presenter and still lists Coxon; conflicts with updated Axios account. Undated page, newly inspected; not proof of attendance.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Public homepage read and captured14September. Identifies FLI as presenter and still lists Coxon; conflicts with updated Axios account. Undated page, newly inspected; not proof of attendance."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-agenda",
      "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
      "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "Undated; event 2026-09-15",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Public agenda read and captured 14 September. FLI opening and closing; Sanders 1pm, Bannon 1:15pm, McCourt coalition-announcement session 3:30pm. Coxon absent from inspected agenda. Plans, not actual attendance or outcomes. Publication time unknown.",
      "note": "Public agenda read and captured 14 September. FLI opening and closing; Sanders 1pm, Bannon 1:15pm, McCourt coalition-announcement session 3:30pm. Coxon absent from inspected agenda. Plans, not actual attendance or outcomes. Publication time unknown.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-agenda",
        "title": "Pro-Human Assembly: organizer agenda",
        "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/",
        "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "Undated; event2026-09-15",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Public agenda read and captured14September. FLI opening and closing; Sanders1pm, Bannon1:15pm, McCourt coalition-announcement session3:30pm. Coxon absent from inspected agenda. Plans, not actual attendance or outcomes. Publication time unknown.",
        "note": "Public agenda read and captured14September. FLI opening and closing; Sanders1pm, Bannon1:15pm, McCourt coalition-announcement session3:30pm. Coxon absent from inspected agenda. Plans, not actual attendance or outcomes. Publication time unknown.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Public agenda read and captured14September. FLI opening and closing; Sanders1pm, Bannon1:15pm, McCourt coalition-announcement session3:30pm. Coxon absent from inspected agenda. Plans, not actual attendance or outcomes. Publication time unknown."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w42-s-mfa",
      "title": "Guo Jiakun press conference — September 14 official transcript",
      "url": "https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202609/t20260914_12021997.html",
      "publisher": "Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Reuters question and Guo answer read in official English transcript. Page displays Updated 2026-09-14 21:37 without explicit timezone. No frontier-slowdown commitment. Direct preservation hit TLS error; web tool text read. Also describes announced BRICS initiatives, not completed services.",
      "note": "Reuters question and Guo answer read in official English transcript. Page displays Updated 2026-09-14 21:37 without explicit timezone. No frontier-slowdown commitment. Direct preservation hit TLS error; web tool text read. Also describes announced BRICS initiatives, not completed services.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w42-s-mfa",
        "title": "Guo Jiakun press conference — September14 official transcript",
        "url": "https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202609/t20260914_12021997.html",
        "publisher": "Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Reuters question and Guo answer read in official English transcript. Page displays Updated2026-09-14 21:37 without explicit timezone. No frontier-slowdown commitment. Direct preservation hit TLS error; web tool text read. Also describes announced BRICS initiatives, not completed services.",
        "note": "Reuters question and Guo answer read in official English transcript. Page displays Updated2026-09-14 21:37 without explicit timezone. No frontier-slowdown commitment. Direct preservation hit TLS error; web tool text read. Also describes announced BRICS initiatives, not completed services.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Reuters question and Guo answer read in official English transcript. Page displays Updated2026-09-14 21:37 without explicit timezone. No frontier-slowdown commitment. Direct preservation hit TLS error; web tool text read. Also describes announced BRICS initiatives, not completed services."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-au-s-act",
      "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
      "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf",
      "publisher": "Federal Register of Legislation",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Authorised Version C2026A00083. Printed pp.1–2: assent and commencement; pp.3–4: information notices and application; pp.5–9: examinations, safeguards and infringement notices. Whole Act commences 12 September 2026. Local PDF preserved.",
      "note": "Authorised Version C2026A00083. Printed pp.1–2: assent and commencement; pp.3–4: information notices and application; pp.5–9: examinations, safeguards and infringement notices. Whole Act commences 12 September 2026. Local PDF preserved.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-au-s-act",
        "title": "Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2026",
        "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf",
        "publisher": "Federal Register of Legislation",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-11",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Authorised Version C2026A00083. Printed pp.1–2: assent and commencement; pp.3–4: information notices and application; pp.5–9: examinations, safeguards and infringement notices. Whole Act commences 12 September 2026. Local PDF preserved.",
        "note": "Authorised Version C2026A00083. Printed pp.1–2: assent and commencement; pp.3–4: information notices and application; pp.5–9: examinations, safeguards and infringement notices. Whole Act commences 12 September 2026. Local PDF preserved.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Authorised Version C2026A00083. Printed pp.1–2: assent and commencement; pp.3–4: information notices and application; pp.5–9: examinations, safeguards and infringement notices. Whole Act commences 12 September 2026. Local PDF preserved."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-au-s-minister",
      "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
      "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law",
      "publisher": "Australian Minister for Communications",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Ministerial announcement identifies age-assurance/app-store providers as examples, and distinguishes maximum court penalties from infringement notices. Statement, not independent proof of actual enforcement.",
      "note": "Ministerial announcement identifies age-assurance/app-store providers as examples, and distinguishes maximum court penalties from infringement notices. Statement, not independent proof of actual enforcement.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-au-s-minister",
        "title": "Australia doubles down on social media law",
        "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law",
        "publisher": "Australian Minister for Communications",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-11",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Ministerial announcement identifies age-assurance/app-store providers as examples, and distinguishes maximum court penalties from infringement notices. Statement, not independent proof of actual enforcement.",
        "note": "Ministerial announcement identifies age-assurance/app-store providers as examples, and distinguishes maximum court penalties from infringement notices. Statement, not independent proof of actual enforcement.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Ministerial announcement identifies age-assurance/app-store providers as examples, and distinguishes maximum court penalties from infringement notices. Statement, not independent proof of actual enforcement."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-s-release",
      "title": "Lummis, Boozman, Scott release final CLARITY Act draft",
      "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/",
      "publisher": "Senator Cynthia Lummis",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Official release read in full; named date September 14. Syndicated copy reports distribution at 03:33 UTC, before this pass's overlap. Its characterization of concessions is the sponsors' claim.",
      "note": "Official release read in full; named date September 14. Syndicated copy reports distribution at 03:33 UTC, before this pass's overlap. Its characterization of concessions is the sponsors' claim.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-s-release",
        "title": "Lummis, Boozman, Scott release final CLARITY Act draft",
        "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/",
        "publisher": "Senator Cynthia Lummis",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Official release read in full; named date September14. Syndicated copy reports distribution at03:33UTC, before this pass's overlap. Its characterization of concessions is the sponsors' claim.",
        "note": "Official release read in full; named date September14. Syndicated copy reports distribution at03:33UTC, before this pass's overlap. Its characterization of concessions is the sponsors' claim.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Official release read in full; named date September14. Syndicated copy reports distribution at03:33UTC, before this pass's overlap. Its characterization of concessions is the sponsors' claim."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-s-bill",
      "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
      "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf",
      "publisher": "Office of Senator Cynthia Lummis",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "635-page proposed substitute; scoped clauses read: section 10404 pp 224–230 (PDF indices 223–229) and proposed 5USC13153(d) pp 629–632 (indices 628–631). Posted via September 14 release. Not enacted; not a full-bill legal review.",
      "note": "635-page proposed substitute; scoped clauses read: section 10404 pp 224–230 (PDF indices 223–229) and proposed 5USC13153(d) pp 629–632 (indices 628–631). Posted via September 14 release. Not enacted; not a full-bill legal review.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-s-bill",
        "title": "CLARITY Act proposed substitute EHF26724",
        "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf",
        "publisher": "Office of Senator Cynthia Lummis",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "635-page proposed substitute; scoped clauses read: section10404 pp224–230 (PDF indices223–229) and proposed5USC13153(d) pp629–632 (indices628–631). Posted via September14 release. Not enacted; not a full-bill legal review.",
        "note": "635-page proposed substitute; scoped clauses read: section10404 pp224–230 (PDF indices223–229) and proposed5USC13153(d) pp629–632 (indices628–631). Posted via September14 release. Not enacted; not a full-bill legal review.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "635-page proposed substitute; scoped clauses read: section10404 pp224–230 (PDF indices223–229) and proposed5USC13153(d) pp629–632 (indices628–631). Posted via September14 release. Not enacted; not a full-bill legal review."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-s-changes",
      "title": "What's new in the final CLARITY Act text",
      "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf",
      "publisher": "Office of Senator Cynthia Lummis",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": null,
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "One-page sponsors' summary read in full. It identifies changed ethics enforcement and 18-month stablecoin circuit-breaker; source ancestry is the same sponsor release/bill, not independent corroboration.",
      "note": "One-page sponsors' summary read in full. It identifies changed ethics enforcement and 18-month stablecoin circuit-breaker; source ancestry is the same sponsor release/bill, not independent corroboration.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-s-changes",
        "title": "What's new in the final CLARITY Act text",
        "url": "https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf",
        "publisher": "Office of Senator Cynthia Lummis",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": null,
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "One-page sponsors' summary read in full. It identifies changed ethics enforcement and18-month stablecoin circuit-breaker; source ancestry is the same sponsor release/bill, not independent corroboration.",
        "note": "One-page sponsors' summary read in full. It identifies changed ethics enforcement and18-month stablecoin circuit-breaker; source ancestry is the same sponsor release/bill, not independent corroboration.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "One-page sponsors' summary read in full. It identifies changed ethics enforcement and18-month stablecoin circuit-breaker; source ancestry is the same sponsor release/bill, not independent corroboration."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-s-paypal-notice",
      "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September 14",
      "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full",
      "publisher": "PayPal",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-06-29",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Notice read in full. Issued June 29; page last updated August 6. Dispute changes explicitly effective September 14,2026; time zone/hour not supplied.",
      "note": "Notice read in full. Issued June 29; page last updated August 6. Dispute changes explicitly effective September 14,2026; time zone/hour not supplied.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-s-paypal-notice",
        "title": "PayPal US policy changes effective September14",
        "url": "https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full",
        "publisher": "PayPal",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-06-29",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Notice read in full. Issued June29; page last updated August6. Dispute changes explicitly effective September14,2026; time zone/hour not supplied.",
        "note": "Notice read in full. Issued June29; page last updated August6. Dispute changes explicitly effective September14,2026; time zone/hour not supplied.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Notice read in full. Issued June29; page last updated August6. Dispute changes explicitly effective September14,2026; time zone/hour not supplied."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-fin-s-paypal-agreement",
      "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September 14,2026",
      "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf",
      "publisher": "PayPal",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "63-page agreement, cover and scoped dispute clauses pp 46–56 read, especially JAMS p 50, mass arbitration pp 52–55, supersession p 56. Currentness date is document label; earlier notice linked it prospectively. Contract text, not judicial enforceability or actual outcome.",
      "note": "63-page agreement, cover and scoped dispute clauses pp 46–56 read, especially JAMS p 50, mass arbitration pp 52–55, supersession p 56. Currentness date is document label; earlier notice linked it prospectively. Contract text, not judicial enforceability or actual outcome.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-fin-s-paypal-agreement",
        "title": "PayPal US User Agreement dated September14,2026",
        "url": "https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf",
        "publisher": "PayPal",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "63-page agreement, cover and scoped dispute clauses pp46–56 read, especially JAMS p50, mass arbitration pp52–55, supersession p56. Currentness date is document label; earlier notice linked it prospectively. Contract text, not judicial enforceability or actual outcome.",
        "note": "63-page agreement, cover and scoped dispute clauses pp46–56 read, especially JAMS p50, mass arbitration pp52–55, supersession p56. Currentness date is document label; earlier notice linked it prospectively. Contract text, not judicial enforceability or actual outcome.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "63-page agreement, cover and scoped dispute clauses pp46–56 read, especially JAMS p50, mass arbitration pp52–55, supersession p56. Currentness date is document label; earlier notice linked it prospectively. Contract text, not judicial enforceability or actual outcome."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-s-jchr-report",
      "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
      "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html",
      "publisher": "UK Parliament — Joint Committee on Human Rights",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Formal minutes 9 September; paragraphs 190–193,224–233.",
      "note": "Recommendations to government; no enacted authority established.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-s-jchr-report",
        "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
        "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html",
        "publisher": "UK Parliament — Joint Committee on Human Rights",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Introduction, conclusions, paragraphs190–193 and224–233, formal minutes and witness index. Underlying witness claims not independently adjudicated."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w43-ai-s-jchr-release",
      "title": "Wide-ranging AI Bill needed to address severe human rights risks posed by AI",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/",
      "publisher": "UK Parliament — Joint Committee on Human Rights",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Committee press release.",
      "note": "Same institutional source as report; homepage displayed 13 September, release and report 14 September.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w43-ai-s-jchr-release",
        "title": "Wide-ranging AI Bill needed to address severe human rights risks posed by AI",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/",
        "publisher": "UK Parliament — Joint Committee on Human Rights",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Full committee news release.",
        "origin_id": "w43-ai-s-jchr-report",
        "origin_ids": [
          "w43-ai-s-jchr-report"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-s-carney",
      "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
      "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel",
      "publisher": "SV Angel",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Full public release read; dated September 14, no publication hour. Appointment and stated mandate are first-party announcements, not independent proof of influence.",
      "note": "Full public release read; dated September 14, no publication hour. Appointment and stated mandate are first-party announcements, not independent proof of influence.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-s-carney",
        "title": "SV Angel announces Jay Carney and Project Blueprint",
        "url": "https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel",
        "publisher": "SV Angel",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Full public release read; dated September 14, no publication hour. Appointment and stated mandate are first-party announcements, not independent proof of influence.",
        "note": "Full public release read; dated September 14, no publication hour. Appointment and stated mandate are first-party announcements, not independent proof of influence.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Full public release read; dated September 14, no publication hour. Appointment and stated mandate are first-party announcements, not independent proof of influence."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-s-blueprint",
      "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
      "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint",
      "publisher": "SV Angel",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "Undated; first read 2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Main initiative page read. Its claimed neutrality and convening success are attributed self-description. No budget, formal decision rights or policy outcome disclosed in the inspected text.",
      "note": "Main initiative page read. Its claimed neutrality and convening success are attributed self-description. No budget, formal decision rights or policy outcome disclosed in the inspected text.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-s-blueprint",
        "title": "Project Blueprint: declared purpose and policy priorities",
        "url": "https://svangel.com/blueprint",
        "publisher": "SV Angel",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "Undated; first read 2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Main initiative page read. Its claimed neutrality and convening success are attributed self-description. No budget, formal decision rights or policy outcome disclosed in the inspected text.",
        "note": "Main initiative page read. Its claimed neutrality and convening success are attributed self-description. No budget, formal decision rights or policy outcome disclosed in the inspected text.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Main initiative page read. Its claimed neutrality and convening success are attributed self-description. No budget, formal decision rights or policy outcome disclosed in the inspected text."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-s-news",
      "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
      "url": "https://svangel.com/news",
      "publisher": "SV Angel",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "News index read: dates the Carney release and Project Blueprint entry September 14. It does not resolve an intraday launch hour.",
      "note": "News index read: dates the Carney release and Project Blueprint entry September 14. It does not resolve an intraday launch hour.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-s-news",
        "title": "SV Angel news index dated September 14",
        "url": "https://svangel.com/news",
        "publisher": "SV Angel",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "News index read: dates the Carney release and Project Blueprint entry September 14. It does not resolve an intraday launch hour.",
        "note": "News index read: dates the Carney release and Project Blueprint entry September 14. It does not resolve an intraday launch hour.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "News index read: dates the Carney release and Project Blueprint entry September 14. It does not resolve an intraday launch hour."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-s-ain",
      "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
      "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/",
      "publisher": "American Innovators Network",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "Undated original launch page; predates September 2026",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Full public launch article read. Named partnerships, executive director and advocacy purpose; not shareholder, funding or voting-right terms. Historical context newly acquired, not a new evening launch.",
      "note": "Full public launch article read. Named partnerships, executive director and advocacy purpose; not shareholder, funding or voting-right terms. Historical context newly acquired, not a new evening launch.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-s-ain",
        "title": "AIN launch announcement and named partners",
        "url": "https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/",
        "publisher": "American Innovators Network",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "published": "Undated original launch page; predates September 2026",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Full public launch article read. Named partnerships, executive director and advocacy purpose; not shareholder, funding or voting-right terms. Historical context newly acquired, not a new evening launch.",
        "note": "Full public launch article read. Named partnerships, executive director and advocacy purpose; not shareholder, funding or voting-right terms. Historical context newly acquired, not a new evening launch.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Full public launch article read. Named partnerships, executive director and advocacy purpose; not shareholder, funding or voting-right terms. Historical context newly acquired, not a new evening launch."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-s-caucus",
      "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
      "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress",
      "publisher": "Axios",
      "kind": "Reported news",
      "published": "2026-09-14T19:32:02Z",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Complete short news-service article read. Reports release supplied to Axios naming Fry/Subramanyam and planned company visits. Underlying release not acquired; direct publisher open failed.",
      "note": "Complete short news-service article read. Reports release supplied to Axios naming Fry/Subramanyam and planned company visits. Underlying release not acquired; direct publisher open failed.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-s-caucus",
        "title": "Axios reports the Innovators Caucus launch",
        "url": "https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress",
        "publisher": "Axios",
        "kind": "Reported news",
        "published": "2026-09-14T19:32:02Z",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Complete short news-service article read. Reports release supplied to Axios naming Fry/Subramanyam and planned company visits. Underlying release not acquired; direct publisher open failed.",
        "note": "Complete short news-service article read. Reports release supplied to Axios naming Fry/Subramanyam and planned company visits. Underlying release not acquired; direct publisher open failed.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Complete short news-service article read. Reports release supplied to Axios naming Fry/Subramanyam and planned company visits. Underlying release not acquired; direct publisher open failed."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-net-s-punchbowl",
      "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
      "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/",
      "publisher": "Punchbowl News",
      "kind": "Reported news",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Public article excerpt read: caucus leaders, SME focus and AIN company visits. No full subscriber article acquired. Not proof of AIN control over the caucus.",
      "note": "Public article excerpt read: caucus leaders, SME focus and AIN company visits. No full subscriber article acquired. Not proof of AIN control over the caucus.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-net-s-punchbowl",
        "title": "Punchbowl reports the little-AI caucus",
        "url": "https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/",
        "publisher": "Punchbowl News",
        "kind": "Reported news",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Public article excerpt read: caucus leaders, SME focus and AIN company visits. No full subscriber article acquired. Not proof of AIN control over the caucus.",
        "note": "Public article excerpt read: caucus leaders, SME focus and AIN company visits. No full subscriber article acquired. Not proof of AIN control over the caucus.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Public article excerpt read: caucus leaders, SME focus and AIN company visits. No full subscriber article acquired. Not proof of AIN control over the caucus."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-age-s-reuters-wsau",
      "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
      "url": "https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/",
      "publisher": "Reuters, republished by WSAU",
      "kind": "News report / public republication",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Full article body; HTML datePublished/dateModified both 2026-09-14T18:19:26+00:00.",
      "note": "Reported Commission draft, not independently obtained or adopted. WSAU is a republication, not a second reporting origin.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-age-s-reuters-wsau",
        "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
        "url": "https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/",
        "publisher": "Reuters, republished by WSAU",
        "kind": "News report / public republication",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "publishedTime": "2026-09-14T18:19:26Z",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Full article body; original public HTML saved and metadata checked.",
        "origin_id": "w44-age-s-reuters-original",
        "origin_ids": [
          "w44-age-s-reuters-original"
        ],
        "capturePath": "news-watch/2026-09-14-1800/age-platform/reuters-wsau.html",
        "captureSha256": "a9a0da85cc18464d64a577cee26f490752e06213df012b21120b9a1fabcea6a5"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-age-s-reuters-original",
      "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
      "url": "https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/eu-is-set-propose-ban-social-media-ai-chatbots-under-15s-2026-09-14/",
      "publisher": "Reuters",
      "kind": "News report / original host",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Original-host URL; full report acquired through the public WSAU republication.",
      "note": "Original host acquisition failed. This is the reporting origin of WSAU, not independent corroboration. Underlying Commission draft not obtained.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-age-s-reuters-original",
        "title": "EU is set to propose ban on social media and AI chatbots for under-15s",
        "url": "https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/eu-is-set-propose-ban-social-media-ai-chatbots-under-15s-2026-09-14/",
        "publisher": "Reuters",
        "kind": "News report / original host",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "state": "inaccessible",
        "readScope": "None at original host; report read at attributed WSAU and MarketScreener republications.",
        "accessNote": "Web cannot-open non-retryable response; no restriction bypass.",
        "unobtainedParent": "Commission draft described by Reuters; no original URL or identifier established."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc",
      "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
      "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850",
      "publisher": "Sky News / Mark Kleinman",
      "kind": "Original reporting",
      "published": "2026-09-14T18:30:00Z",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Rendered article lines 26–57",
      "note": "Sky reports PDC will seek about £50m from banks and payment providers for setup through 2028; CEO search underway. Nineteen firms supplied early backing; Visa and Mastercard participated, alongside PayPal and others. Future infrastructure requires additional funding. Origin reporting: unnamed city/process sources. PDC spokesperson confirms only general mission, not financial terms. AskTraders, Investing.com and Reddit descend from Sky, not independent confirmation. Planned raise is not subscribed or closed capital. No executed equity terms, voting rights, procurement award, operating network or sovereign independence demonstrated.",
      "state": "read",
      "readScope": "Rendered article lines 26–57",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-s-sky-pdc",
        "title": "UK banks kick off fundraising in bid to create new payments giant",
        "url": "https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850",
        "publisher": "Sky News / Mark Kleinman",
        "kind": "Original reporting",
        "published": "2026-09-14T18:30:00Z",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Rendered article lines 26–57",
        "note": "Sky reports PDC will seek about £50m from banks and payment providers for setup through 2028; CEO search underway. Nineteen firms supplied early backing; Visa and Mastercard participated, alongside PayPal and others. Future infrastructure requires additional funding. Origin reporting: unnamed city/process sources. PDC spokesperson confirms only general mission, not financial terms. AskTraders, Investing.com and Reddit descend from Sky, not independent confirmation. Planned raise is not subscribed or closed capital. No executed equity terms, voting rights, procurement award, operating network or sovereign independence demonstrated.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Rendered article lines 26–57"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-s-boe-model",
      "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
      "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure",
      "publisher": "Bank of England",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025-07-15",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Rendered lines 17–41",
      "note": "Public authorities set strategy; BoE-chaired RPIB translates it into design and oversees delivery. Industry-owned DeliveryCo procures and funds infrastructure. Pay.UK operates existing systems. Regulatory supervision remains separate. Primary institutional announcement, historical context, not an evening change. Governance model does not prove September financing execution or precise shareholder rights.",
      "state": "read",
      "readScope": "Rendered lines 17–41",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-s-boe-model",
        "title": "Payments Vision Delivery Committee Update",
        "url": "https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure",
        "publisher": "Bank of England",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025-07-15",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Rendered lines 17–41",
        "note": "Public authorities set strategy; BoE-chaired RPIB translates it into design and oversees delivery. Industry-owned DeliveryCo procures and funds infrastructure. Pay.UK operates existing systems. Regulatory supervision remains separate. Primary institutional announcement, historical context, not an evening change. Governance model does not prove September financing execution or precise shareholder rights.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Rendered lines 17–41"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-s-ukfinance-eoi",
      "title": "Establishing DeliveryCo: Call for Initial Funders",
      "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders",
      "publisher": "UK Finance",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2025 call; exact publication day not exposed",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Rendered lines 13–26",
      "note": "Initial funder expression-of-interest call followed October 2025 RPIB meeting and closed 14 November 2025; it expressly did not constitute a binding funding commitment. Primary industry invitation; distinct from Sky's newly reported September equity solicitation. Do not count invitation, expressions of interest and funded equity as one event.",
      "state": "read",
      "readScope": "Rendered lines 13–26",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-s-ukfinance-eoi",
        "title": "Establishing DeliveryCo: Call for Initial Funders",
        "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders",
        "publisher": "UK Finance",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2025 call; exact publication day not exposed",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Rendered lines 13–26",
        "note": "Initial funder expression-of-interest call followed October 2025 RPIB meeting and closed 14 November 2025; it expressly did not constitute a binding funding commitment. Primary industry invitation; distinct from Sky's newly reported September equity solicitation. Do not count invitation, expressions of interest and funded equity as one event.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Rendered lines 13–26"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-s-technet",
      "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
      "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/",
      "publisher": "TechNet",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "September 14, 2026 indicated by official search index; actual release says launched today without calendar date",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Rendered lines 0–7 recovered with find on earlier successful page reference",
      "note": "TechNet announces SACA with founding members Amazon, Netflix and YouTube; Mike Ward leads it. It intends Washington advocacy concerning streaming access and programming investment, including live sports. Coalition operator's own announcement. It establishes announced formation and named roles, not truth of claimed consumer benefits. No launch hour. Direct metadata request returned 403 and was not retried. One direct web reopen failed, but initial cached full text remained readable. Intraday classification unresolved.",
      "state": "read",
      "readScope": "Rendered lines 0–7 recovered with find on earlier successful page reference",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-s-technet",
        "title": "Video Streamers Launch New Coalition",
        "url": "https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/",
        "publisher": "TechNet",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "September 14, 2026 indicated by official search index; actual release says launched today without calendar date",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Rendered lines 0–7 recovered with find on earlier successful page reference",
        "note": "TechNet announces SACA with founding members Amazon, Netflix and YouTube; Mike Ward leads it. It intends Washington advocacy concerning streaming access and programming investment, including live sports. Coalition operator's own announcement. It establishes announced formation and named roles, not truth of claimed consumer benefits. No launch hour. Direct metadata request returned 403 and was not retried. One direct web reopen failed, but initial cached full text remained readable. Intraday classification unresolved.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Rendered lines 0–7 recovered with find on earlier successful page reference"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-s-saca",
      "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
      "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/",
      "publisher": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance / TechNet",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "Undated",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Rendered lines 0–10, 29–44",
      "note": "The coalition site identifies its founders and seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and freedom for sports-rights distribution partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. Same institutional source family as TechNet release; not independent corroboration. Advocacy aims do not establish enacted rules, exclusive rights, policy capture, a budget amount, or benefits to consumers.",
      "state": "read",
      "readScope": "Rendered lines 0–10, 29–44",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-s-saca",
        "title": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance",
        "url": "https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/",
        "publisher": "Streaming Access and Choice Alliance / TechNet",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "Undated",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Rendered lines 0–10, 29–44",
        "note": "The coalition site identifies its founders and seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and freedom for sports-rights distribution partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. Same institutional source family as TechNet release; not independent corroboration. Advocacy aims do not establish enacted rules, exclusive rights, policy capture, a budget amount, or benefits to consumers.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Rendered lines 0–10, 29–44"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-fin-s-technet-date-index",
      "title": "TechNet Research Center index",
      "url": "https://www.technet.org/rc/",
      "publisher": "TechNet",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "Search-index entry says September 14, 2026",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Search result labels Video Streamers Launch New Coalition September 14, 2026; opening returned older cached index listing August 28",
      "note": "Date support is search-index-only because open/search versions diverged. Same operator, unstable index cache. Do not convert crawl/observation date to publication time.",
      "state": "index-only",
      "readScope": "Search result labels Video Streamers Launch New Coalition September 14, 2026; opening returned older cached index listing August 28",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-fin-s-technet-date-index",
        "title": "TechNet Research Center index",
        "url": "https://www.technet.org/rc/",
        "publisher": "TechNet",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "Search-index entry says September 14, 2026",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Search result labels Video Streamers Launch New Coalition September 14, 2026; opening returned older cached index listing August 28",
        "note": "Date support is search-index-only because open/search versions diverged. Same operator, unstable index cache. Do not convert crawl/observation date to publication time.",
        "state": "index-only",
        "readScope": "Search result labels Video Streamers Launch New Coalition September 14, 2026; opening returned older cached index listing August 28"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-ai-s-ms-announcement",
      "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
      "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/",
      "publisher": "Microsoft AI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Full article; especially Tell us how AI can work better. JSON-LD published13:00:00Z, modified13:19:14Z.",
      "note": "First-party process announcement linked to the draft; not independent corroboration.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-ai-s-ms-announcement",
        "title": "Humanist AI in practice: A public consultation on our Code of Conduct for MAI Models",
        "url": "https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/",
        "publisher": "Microsoft AI",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Full article; especially Tell us how AI can work better. JSON-LD published13:00:00Z, modified13:19:14Z.",
        "note": "First-party process announcement linked to the draft; not independent corroboration.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Full article body and publication/update metadata.",
        "publishedAt": "2026-09-14T13:00:00Z",
        "modifiedAt": "2026-09-14T13:19:14Z",
        "retrievedAt": "2026-09-14T23:07:01.4202552Z",
        "capturePath": "microsoft-announcement.html",
        "sha256": "483206fb20c6f7f62a11d33e12bdfbf64b8efb62eb92dab5dab17176f0e21f5b",
        "origin_id": "w44-ai-s-mai-code",
        "origin_ids": [
          "w44-ai-s-mai-code"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w44-ai-s-mai-code",
      "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
      "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/",
      "publisher": "Microsoft AI",
      "kind": "Primary public record",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-14",
      "locator": "Preface; Part2 sections2.2,2.4,2.5; Part5; AppendixA MAI Models; AppendixB introduction. PDF preface printedp3.",
      "note": "Same-work HTML/PDF. Published13:00Z; HTML modified17:44:20Z. Prior version unavailable; modification scope unknown.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w44-ai-s-mai-code",
        "title": "Humanist AI Code of Conduct — public draft",
        "url": "https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/",
        "publisher": "Microsoft AI",
        "kind": "Primary public record",
        "published": "2026-09-14",
        "accessed": "2026-09-14",
        "locator": "Preface; Part2 sections2.2,2.4,2.5; Part5; AppendixA MAI Models; AppendixB introduction. PDF preface printedp3.",
        "note": "Same-work HTML/PDF. Published13:00Z; HTML modified17:44:20Z. Prior version unavailable; modification scope unknown.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "HTML governance sections listed in locator, Part1 objectives and About; PDF preface/contents. Other defaults/examples not comprehensively assessed.",
        "publishedAt": "2026-09-14T13:00:00Z",
        "modifiedAt": "2026-09-14T17:44:20Z",
        "retrievedAt": "2026-09-14T23:07:01.5280994Z",
        "capturePath": "microsoft-code.html",
        "sha256": "7a84e227636049653b261fc4d421f7f7eead7b3ce906a413d09b994a58de8b5a",
        "captureAlternates": [
          {
            "url": "https://microsoft.ai/pdf/MAI_CodeOfConduct.pdf",
            "path": "MAI_CodeOfConduct.pdf",
            "sha256": "bbd86377ed7e669ebd01fd125ec8613c05c74898db8a1a618a125d4cc103ddb0",
            "retrievedAt": "2026-09-14T23:07:22.0751839Z",
            "sameWork": true
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-controlai",
      "title": "ControlAI's Creator Outreach",
      "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach",
      "publisher": "ControlAI",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-08",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Sections: ControlAI's Work; Our Partnerships; Sabine case.",
      "note": "Self-reported campaign counts and terms; not independent contract audit."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-funding",
      "title": "METR funding update",
      "url": "https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Funding and independence paragraphs.",
      "note": "$71m in commitments; denies frontier-company cash and staff-directed gifts; acknowledges significant free tokens."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-metr-about",
      "title": "About METR: partnerships and funding",
      "url": "https://metr.org/about",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Partnerships and Funding sections.",
      "note": "Lists Anthropic among five lab partnerships, token access and EU technical assistance."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-metr-review",
      "title": "METR review of Anthropic automated-R&D risk report",
      "url": "https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf",
      "publisher": "METR",
      "kind": "Primary review",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "pp. 1–2 findings; p. 12 review-process appendix.",
      "note": "Substantive methodological criticism, shared low-risk bottom line for Opus 4.6, no redactions, pilot general publication veto."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-amodei",
      "title": "TIME profile of Dario and Daniela Amodei",
      "url": "https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/",
      "publisher": "TIME",
      "kind": "Original reporting",
      "published": "2023-09-07",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Opening identifies them as siblings.",
      "note": "Original profile establishes sibling relationship."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-leadership",
      "title": "Anthropic leadership",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/company/leadership",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Dario and Daniela leadership entries.",
      "note": "Current company roles."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-wife",
      "title": "Ezra Klein interviews Holden Karnofsky, transcript",
      "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf",
      "publisher": "The New York Times transcript, hosted by Coefficient Giving",
      "kind": "Primary interview",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "p. 28: Karnofsky identifies Daniela Amodei as his wife.",
      "note": "First-person family identification."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-coefficient",
      "title": "Our Progress in 2023 and Plans for 2024",
      "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/",
      "publisher": "Coefficient Giving (then Open Philanthropy)",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2024-02-15",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Leadership changes section.",
      "note": "Identifies Karnofsky as former CEO who stepped down to work on AI safety."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-anthropic-report",
      "title": "Anthropic's Pilot Sabotage Risk Report",
      "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary authored report",
      "published": "2025-10-28",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Main-report author byline.",
      "note": "Names Karnofsky among report authors."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-tescreal",
      "title": "The TESCREAL bundle",
      "url": "https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636",
      "publisher": "First Monday",
      "kind": "Original scholarly argument",
      "published": "2024-04-01",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "Abstract and paper by Timnit Gebru and Émile P. Torres.",
      "note": "A critical analytic framework, not a legal entity or membership roster."
    },
    {
      "id": "w45-s-time-ea",
      "title": "Inside Anthropic, the AI Company Betting That Safety Can Be a Winning Strategy",
      "url": "https://time.com/6980000/anthropic/",
      "publisher": "TIME",
      "kind": "Original reporting",
      "published": "2024-05-30",
      "accessed": "2026-09-16",
      "locator": "EA affiliation discussion.",
      "note": "Company spokesperson said neither Amodei sibling personally identified as EA, while sympathetic to some underpinning ideas."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-commons",
      "title": "Lightcone Commons: funding and evaluation process",
      "url": "https://www.lightconecommons.com/",
      "publisher": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-ltff-close",
      "title": "Closing the LTFF, Spending Down Funds, and a New AI Fund at EA Funds",
      "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea",
      "publisher": "Caleb Parikh / EA Forum",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts. Read via web extraction; direct local HTML capture failed."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-taif-launch",
      "title": "EA Funds is launching the Transformative AI Fund",
      "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund",
      "publisher": "Lowe Lundin / EA Funds",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts. Read via web extraction; direct local HTML capture failed."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-taif",
      "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
      "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai",
      "publisher": "EA Funds",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-cg-scale",
      "title": "We are urgently scaling our work on AI and biosecurity",
      "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/",
      "publisher": "Coefficient Giving",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-80k-strategy",
      "title": "Our strategy at 80,000 Hours",
      "url": "https://80000hours.org/2026/05/our-strategy-at-80000-hours/",
      "publisher": "80,000 Hours",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-05",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-80k-pivot",
      "title": "Shifting strategic approach to focus more on AGI",
      "url": "https://80000hours.org/2025/04/strategic-approach/",
      "publisher": "80,000 Hours",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2025-04-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-80k-tailwind",
      "title": "Max Nadeau on recruiting founders for a new wave of AI safety nonprofits",
      "url": "https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/",
      "publisher": "80,000 Hours",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-cea",
      "title": "CEA press kit",
      "url": "https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit",
      "publisher": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-egc",
      "title": "Going Bigger: Scaling Effective Giving and Careers in 2026",
      "url": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers",
      "publisher": "Melanie Basnak / Coefficient Giving",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts. Read via web extraction; direct local HTML capture failed."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-need",
      "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
      "url": "https://www.need-network.org/",
      "publisher": "NEED",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w46-s-ipc",
      "title": "Impactful Policy Careers accelerator",
      "url": "https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/",
      "publisher": "Impactful Policy Careers",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Organization or author statement; article body and named programme/funding disclosures.",
      "note": "First-party account. Announced allocations and recommended grants are not recorded as bank receipts."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-video",
      "title": "They Told You That AI Went \"Rogue\"...",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu59YscYFhk",
      "publisher": "Upper Echelon",
      "kind": "Secondary report",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Secondary commentary; full local media and automatic captions archived. Entire caption transcript reviewed; selected frames inspected.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Video and automatic captions preserved in the private archive."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-grant",
      "title": "Pattern Labs - Technological Risk Mitigation",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/",
      "publisher": "Good Ventures",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2024-02",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "March 23, 2025 snapshot of first-party grant entry. Lists $6.8m over two years and Open Philanthropy recommendation. Live former URL now redirects to Our Giving; reason not established.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-sequoia",
      "title": "Partnering with Irregular: Ahead of the Curve",
      "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/",
      "publisher": "Sequoia Capital",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2025-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Investor account; founders, former name, lab collaboration and compliance products. Investor descriptions of importance are attributed.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-launch",
      "title": "Irregular launch announcement by co-founder Omer Nevo",
      "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7",
      "publisher": "Omer Nevo / Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2025-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Founder explicitly confirms former Pattern Labs name; company announces $80m raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. No per-investor allocation inferred.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-israel",
      "title": "About Effective Altruism Israel",
      "url": "https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95",
      "publisher": "Effective Altruism Israel",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Hebrew first-party page: board heading and Omer Nevo name reviewed; mission and career focus.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-heron",
      "title": "About Heron",
      "url": "https://www.heronsec.ai/about",
      "publisher": "Heron",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "First-party team, Omer Nevo advisory role, EA Israel project/legal host and Coefficient Giving funder disclosure.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-pg",
      "title": "About Probably Good",
      "url": "https://probablygood.org/about/",
      "publisher": "Probably Good",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "First-party board biographies: Omer and Sella Nevo co-founders; historical roles separated from current board membership.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-ife",
      "title": "About Impact Focused Education",
      "url": "https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about",
      "publisher": "Impact Focused Education",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "First-party founders Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo. Some biographies retain older organization/job names; current RAND profile controls current title.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-sella",
      "title": "Sella Nevo - RAND profile",
      "url": "https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html",
      "publisher": "RAND",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Current profile identifies founding director of RAND Center on AI, Security, and Technology; not merely the older Meselson title.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Read via web extraction; local capture unavailable."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-weights",
      "title": "Securing AI Model Weights: Preventing Theft and Misuse of Frontier Models",
      "url": "https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html",
      "publisher": "RAND",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2024-05-30",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Publication page, authorship, summary, recommendations and funding statement read. Full 128-page report not read this pass.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Read via web extraction; local capture unavailable."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-mooc",
      "title": "EA Funds grant ledger - Lahav and Nevo MOOC grant",
      "url": "https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants",
      "publisher": "EA Funds",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2022 Q3",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Direct endpoint returns CSV. Row recqhbPcafZbYOMBd lists one joint $394,968 grant; neither course title nor receiving organization is specified.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-anth-july",
      "title": "Investigating three incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-07-30",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Initial first-party incident account and comparison to OpenAI; read with September assessment, which adds a fourth incident and revises the interpretation.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-anth-sept",
      "title": "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Introduction, incident summary, named model accounts and resampling sections reviewed, including September 10 corrections. No blanket zero-percent harm claim.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-openai-third",
      "title": "Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/",
      "publisher": "OpenAI",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main article: Irregular and AISI incidents explicitly separate from Hugging Face. Continued partnership and white-paper participation stated.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-irregular-response",
      "title": "Addressing Recent Incidents: Ongoing Findings and Path Forward",
      "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward",
      "publisher": "Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main article: operator account focuses on domain-collision scenario and containment/remediation; does not describe every unrelated summer incident.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-hf",
      "title": "Hugging Face model evaluation security incident",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/",
      "publisher": "OpenAI",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-07-21",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Initial article with July and August updates; package-proxy escape differs from the Irregular open-network misconfiguration.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-meta",
      "title": "Meta AI incident and Irregular statement",
      "url": "https://apnews.com/article/meta-ai-hacking-anthropic-irregular-openai-0e8061437da6779be962b24ac134a514",
      "publisher": "Associated Press",
      "kind": "Secondary report",
      "published": "2026-08-06",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Named-company spokesperson statements in reporting. Relationship marked reported; no standalone Meta postmortem acquired.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Read via web extraction; local capture unavailable."
    },
    {
      "id": "w47-s-effort",
      "title": "A Single Firm is Behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta Hacking Scandals",
      "url": "https://www.effort.news/irregular",
      "publisher": "Effort News",
      "kind": "Secondary report",
      "published": "2026-09-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Secondary investigation used as a route to primary documents; its intent and liability allegations are not adopted as established findings.",
      "note": "Read on September 19, 2026. Original content captured locally."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-s-agenda",
      "title": "AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069",
      "publisher": "Gekker et al. / arXiv",
      "kind": "Primary research",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Read PDF pages 1–5, 38–41, 60–63 and selected methods pages 89–96. Financial disclosure p.3; methods pp.89–96.",
      "note": "Captured 101-page PDF. Selected sections read, not the entire paper. Archive metadata reports June 23 despite the July-formatted identifier; no publication-date inference used."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-root-s-intro",
      "title": "Introducing AI Security Priorities: A Field-Wide Agenda",
      "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda",
      "publisher": "Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-24",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full announcement read.",
      "note": "First-party account of its policy-research collaboration; announcement date, not date of adoption."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-resolution-funding",
      "title": "Resolution: $160m grant and its conditions",
      "url": "https://resolution.org/post/funding",
      "publisher": "Resolution",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-07-07",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full recipient article read; base, conditional component, regranting and timeline. Agreement not available.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-resolution-openai",
      "title": "OpenAI grants Resolution $10m in API credits",
      "url": "https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits",
      "publisher": "Resolution",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-31",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full recipient announcement read. Credits are in-kind; usage contract not inspected.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-resolution-team",
      "title": "Resolution has a new Agent Foundations team",
      "url": "https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team",
      "publisher": "Resolution / Jeremy Gillen",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-02",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full team announcement read, including stated internal disagreement. Linked technical papers not reviewed.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-cg-governance",
      "title": "Coefficient Giving: Our Structure",
      "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/governance/",
      "publisher": "Coefficient Giving",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Complete main governance text read via web tool; direct capture returned 403.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-tailwind-faq",
      "title": "Project Tailwind: Frequently Asked Questions",
      "url": "https://coefficientgiving.org/tailwind/faqs/",
      "publisher": "Coefficient Giving",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full FAQ read via web tool; direct capture returned 403. Published programme terms, not signed agreements.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-epoch-transparency",
      "title": "Epoch AI: Transparency",
      "url": "https://epoch.ai/about/transparency",
      "publisher": "Epoch AI",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Main funding, collaboration and policy disclosures read; individual contracts not inspected.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-epoch-output",
      "title": "Scaling Our Global AI Data Center Research",
      "url": "https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research",
      "publisher": "Epoch AI",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-16",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full update read; database coverage is Epoch estimate, not an independent audit.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-redwood-work",
      "title": "Redwood Research: research and advisory work",
      "url": "https://www.redwoodresearch.org/",
      "publisher": "Redwood Research",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Main homepage read; named collaborations and outputs, not full linked papers.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-irving-bio",
      "title": "Geoffrey Irving: biography",
      "url": "https://naml.us/",
      "publisher": "Geoffrey Irving",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Biography read for present and historical professional roles.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-moskovitz-foundation",
      "title": "Moskovitz: Anthropic shares and foundation",
      "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3miawblqk7224",
      "publisher": "Dustin Moskovitz",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-03-30",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Complete original post read. Does not name legal recipient or account.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-moskovitz-support",
      "title": "Moskovitz: funding METR and Redwood",
      "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o",
      "publisher": "Dustin Moskovitz",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-11",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Complete original post read; donor self-statement, no award amount or vehicle.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-cap-s-moskovitz-gv",
      "title": "Moskovitz: Good Ventures benefits from Anthropic investments",
      "url": "https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mtygcpxluc2b",
      "publisher": "Dustin Moskovitz",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-08-26",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Complete original post read with original timestamp; no legal titleholder identified.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s01",
      "title": "Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main announcement; related marketing links not investigated.",
      "note": "New direct funding, embedded access and non-exclusive arrangements; METR self-funded pilots are a separate proposed arrangement.",
      "published": "2026-09-18"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s02",
      "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Partner to Build Team of Embedded Evaluators at Anthropic",
      "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic",
      "publisher": "Accenture",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full announcement including forward-looking statement.",
      "note": "Counterparty confirmation; each expects at least USD1bn investment in AI safety over five years, not a USD2bn evaluator contract price.",
      "published": "2026-09-18"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s07",
      "title": "Advanced AI Framework",
      "url": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "PDF pp7-8 independent evaluation, pp10-11 enforcement; 19 pages total, remainder not claimed read.",
      "note": "Policy proposal includes independent-evaluator qualification/licensing, conflict disclosures, pooled/government funding and avoiding evaluator shopping; not enacted rules or Accenture contract terms.",
      "published": "2026-06"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s08",
      "title": "Accenture Completes Acquisition of Faculty",
      "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty",
      "publisher": "Accenture",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main announcement.",
      "note": "Acquisition completed, >400 staff, Marc Warner adds Accenture CTO role while Faculty CEO. Purchase price undisclosed.",
      "published": "2026-03-16"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s09",
      "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Launch Multi-Year Partnership to Drive Enterprise AI Innovation and Value Across Industries",
      "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries",
      "publisher": "Accenture",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full announcement, commercial business-group sections and forward-looking terms.",
      "note": "Joint business group, ~30000 staff training, Claude adoption, co-developed regulated-industry offerings and co-investment in Claude Center of Excellence precede evaluator arrangement.",
      "published": "2025-12-09"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s10",
      "title": "Accenture and Anthropic Team to Help Organizations Secure, Scale AI-Driven Cybersecurity Operations",
      "url": "https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations",
      "publisher": "Accenture",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main release, internal-use assertions and financial disclaimer.",
      "note": "Cyber.AI product built around Claude; company reports its own operational deployment. Performance claims remain vendor assertions.",
      "published": "2026-03-25"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s11",
      "title": "Introducing the Services Track and Partner Hub of the Claude Partner Network",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/services-track-partner-hub",
      "publisher": "Anthropic",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full announcement, tier and referral-credit paragraphs.",
      "note": "Commercial programme separates practice tiers from referral credit/deal protection and funds training/support/shared marketing; no individual Accenture referral payment or tier amount established.",
      "published": "2026-06-03"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-eval-s12",
      "title": "Faculty Science Limited: persons with significant control",
      "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control",
      "publisher": "Companies House",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Company identity and active Accenture plc control record, notification date and nature of control. Historical personal details not used.",
      "note": "Accenture plc notified 12 March 2026; 75% or more shares and votes plus right to appoint/remove directors. Separate from completion announcement on March16."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s01",
      "title": "50+ Leading Organizations Launch Coalition for Pro-Human AI",
      "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html",
      "publisher": "Project Liberty",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full release body, organizer primary statement distributed by PR Newswire; not independent wire reporting.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet.",
      "published": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s02",
      "title": "Coalition organization and workstreams",
      "url": "https://prohumanai.co/",
      "publisher": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Main text and roster/steering sections, including HTML links for logos whose accessible text is empty.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s03",
      "title": "Coalition privacy notice",
      "url": "https://prohumanai.co/privacy",
      "publisher": "Pro-Human AI Coalition / Project Liberty Institute",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Opening operator identification and section 4 member sharing; not a fresh legal-compliance audit.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s04",
      "title": "Prepared Remarks: Sanders: Regulating AI is as American as apple pie",
      "url": "https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/prepared-remarks-sanders-regulating-ai-is-as-american-as-apple-pie/",
      "publisher": "US Senate / Bernie Sanders",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Entire prepared remarks read. Prepared text and office statement of appearance, not independently transcribed delivery.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet.",
      "published": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s05",
      "title": "CNN News Central interview with Rep Greg Casar",
      "url": "https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12",
      "publisher": "CNN",
      "kind": "Primary interview",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "AI interview segment at 15:30-15:40 ET, plus Sanders/Bannon clip text; unrelated later segments excluded; rush transcript.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet.",
      "published": "2026-09-15"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s06",
      "title": "Assembly social-media toolkit",
      "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Entire visible page; linked Sosha application not opened or operated.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s07",
      "title": "Assembly event recap",
      "url": "https://prohumanassembly.org/recap/",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Whole visible page and embedded video identifier extracted. One recap and more-content placeholders, not a full proceedings archive.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eval-s-assembly-s10",
      "title": "Recap | The Pro-Human Assembly, September 2026",
      "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffsR2KrIS4k",
      "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "45-second official recap. Metadata and complete English automatic captions retrieved; no audio/video viewing claimed. Caption text reviewed, speakers not identified visually.",
      "note": "Scoped primary-source reading retained in private campaign packet.",
      "published": "2026-09-17"
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-fund",
      "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund: structure and applications",
      "url": "https://corrigibilityresearch.org/",
      "publisher": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Entire fund page; Lightcone legal approval and future application platform.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-awards",
      "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund grantees: round 1",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1",
      "publisher": "Max Harms",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full award report and footnotes.",
      "note": "Eight announced awards total $132,000; not independent bank-payment confirmation."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-method",
      "title": "How I am evaluating corrigibility grant applications",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications",
      "publisher": "Max Harms",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-09-03",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "First-party procedure, decisions table and conclusions.",
      "note": "Private applications and model runs were not accessed."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-migration",
      "title": "Lightcone 2026 fundraiser",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026",
      "publisher": "Oliver Habryka",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2025-12-13",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "ARM sponsorship and programme discussion.",
      "note": "Prior-host wording conflicts with ARM About; no Mercatus/Emergent Ventures edge inferred."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-arm",
      "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund: About",
      "url": "https://www.airiskfund.com/about",
      "publisher": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Complete public organizational disclosure.",
      "note": "Still names Effective Ventures donation entities; dated migration instrument needed to reconcile."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-conflicts",
      "title": "EA Funds Conflict of Interest Policy",
      "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSN-VoZLgy1U676-vuLK_fOL6mcQ_K1qGWXzlBhQJg0/edit",
      "publisher": "EA Funds",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2023-03-30",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Entire public Google Doc export, currently linked from TAIF.",
      "note": "Written policy; individual grant compliance not checked."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-com-s-board",
      "title": "Habryka reply about Lightcone board-removal arrangements",
      "url": "https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform?commentId=JeW6ShEqiajquE59o",
      "publisher": "Oliver Habryka",
      "kind": "Primary statement",
      "published": "2026-07-22",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Specific reply JeW6ShEqiajquE59o, read in GreaterWrong mirror.",
      "note": "Dated unsigned-resolution statement, not a claim that the issue remains unresolved today."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-s-landing",
      "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal publication",
      "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy",
      "publisher": "European Commission",
      "kind": "Official proposal or supporting document",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Complete download landing page.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-s-proposal",
      "title": "EU KIDS Act proposal: COM(2026)681 final",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132530",
      "publisher": "European Commission",
      "kind": "Official proposal or supporting document",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Articles5,8,28–36; full PDF obtained; selected operative provisions read.",
      "note": "Proposal2026/0286(COD), not enacted; apparent drafting placeholders retained."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-s-communication",
      "title": "An EU approach to online child safety: COM(2026)680 final",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132528",
      "publisher": "European Commission",
      "kind": "Official proposal or supporting document",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Sections2.1–2.4, printed pages3–5.",
      "note": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-s-impact",
      "title": "EU KIDS Act: Analysis of Impacts, SWD(2026)681 final",
      "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132529",
      "publisher": "European Commission",
      "kind": "Official proposal or supporting document",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Selected consultation, commissioned-study, exclusion and implementation-cost sections; 5Rights/WeProtect references.",
      "note": "Citation reuse is not evidence of drafting control. August study final publication expectedQ4."
    },
    {
      "id": "w48-eu-s-faq",
      "title": "The KIDS Act explained",
      "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/kids-act-explained",
      "publisher": "European Commission",
      "kind": "Official proposal or supporting document",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full official FAQ.",
      "note": "Read with operative exceptions in proposal."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s01",
      "title": "Cyber, Safeguarding and Advisory Work",
      "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024",
      "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology / Find a Tender",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-02-09",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main award notice, sections I, II, IV, V, VI; official HTML locally extracted to text. Original GBP195434 excluding VAT superseded by auth-s02. Contract conclusion 2024-02-09; one tender; technical-reasons direct-award justification.",
      "note": "Web retrieval tool could not open notice or PDF; direct Invoke-WebRequest returned official HTML. OCID ocds-h6vhtk-0438d1."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s02",
      "title": "Amendment to Cyber, Safeguards and Advisory work FTS notice",
      "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024",
      "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology / Find a Tender",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-04-08",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main corrigendum, including II.1.4 and VII.1.2. Explicit new end date25April2024 and replacement of GBP195434 with GBP293151.",
      "note": "Discovered/captured via direct HTTP by capital lane; identical official HTML copied into authority lane and independently read. Do not sum original and corrected values."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s03",
      "title": "AI Specific Attacks and Safeguards",
      "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4",
      "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology / Contracts Finder",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-10-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main award notice: description, amount, award/start/end, supplier, procurement route and attached contract link.",
      "note": "Award/start17September2024, notice end16June2025; six-month initial term with optional three-month extension. GBP459875 is an award value, not paid-expenditure evidence. Direct HTTP capture succeeded after web tool403. Discovered through D3 Tenders, used only as a pointer."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s04",
      "title": "Pattern Labs redacted Contract Safeguard.zip",
      "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec",
      "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology / Contracts Finder",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-10-14",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Official ZIP contains19 ODT/DOCX schedules. Entire text extracted without execution. Read order form, Order Schedules1(Transparency),4(Tender, wholly commercially redacted),5(Pricing),9(Security),15(Management),20(Specification). Remaining schedules keyword-scanned only. No visual/layout review. No claim all incorporated terms reviewed.",
      "note": "PRJ3674, supplier Pattern Labs Tech Inc. Special terms1/3 govern IP exclusions and deliverable precedence. Supplier owns background IP, derivatives, improvements and know-how; defined deliverables are separately scoped. Schedule20 buyer sign-off and publication rights do not establish model-release authority. Approved security plan, delivered work and verification records absent from bundle. Introductory order-form date16July2024 differs from notice award/start and signature-date fields17September2024. Core Terms clause11.2 is referenced but Core Terms are not bundled; no liability cap conclusion. Pricing total459875 explicitly excludes VAT/sales tax as applicable."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s05",
      "title": "DSIT spending over GBP25000: April2025",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/69735d123f2908a34904059e/dsit-spending-over-25000-april-2025.csv",
      "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Table headers and Pattern Labs Tech Inc row: payment04/04/2025, consultancy expenditure, AISI expense area, transaction668259, amount153000. Other payment rows not comprehensively audited.",
      "note": "Supplier row does not supply a contract reference. No attribution to PRJ3674 or the February2024 contract. No sum with award values."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s07",
      "title": "Evidence for inference scaling in AI cyber tasks: Increased evaluation budgets reveal higher success rates",
      "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates",
      "publisher": "UK AI Security Institute",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-03-05",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main article and figure captions via web extraction, especially private-evaluation methodology, limitations, cost-per-success discussion and Going forward. Charts not separately digitized/replicated.",
      "note": "Government confirms joint methods research. Article argues threshold-relevant implications; no named release decision or delegated authority."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s-self-modification",
      "title": "Agentic Self-Modification in Open-Weights Systems",
      "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems",
      "publisher": "Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-09-16",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Article main body read; study setup, outcomes and limitations; no underlying code execution.",
      "note": "Company or investor account; findings attributed to the author."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s-frontiercyber",
      "title": "FrontierCyber: Bringing Offensive Cyber Evaluations to Real Systems",
      "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber",
      "publisher": "Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-06-22",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full article main body read; environment, scoring and comparability sections.",
      "note": "Company or investor account; findings attributed to the author."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s-sequoia-podcast",
      "title": "Securing the AI Frontier: Irregular Co-founder Dan Lahav",
      "url": "https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav",
      "publisher": "Sequoia Capital",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Transcript through AI Model Capabilities and Cybersecurity; especially labs-first commercial strategy, paragraph beginning In markets that are dominated; remainder captured but not read.",
      "note": "Company or investor account; findings attributed to the author."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s-legal-name",
      "title": "Best Practices for Evaluations and Evaluation Suites: Part 1",
      "url": "https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1",
      "publisher": "Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main article read through web extraction; legal claim uses copyright footer at extracted line101. Current served wording, not a verified historical snapshot.",
      "note": "Current served company disclosure; not a historical snapshot."
    },
    {
      "id": "w49-s-subscription",
      "title": "Privacy Policy",
      "url": "https://www.irregular.com/privacy-policy",
      "publisher": "Irregular",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full policy sections1–7, especially sections1–2/extracted lines25–28.",
      "note": "Current served company disclosure; not a historical snapshot."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-s001",
      "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2024",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full",
      "publisher": "Good Ventures Foundation / IRS filing via ProPublica",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2025-05-15",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Read the complete Pattern Labs rows with their column headings in the main grants-paid and future-payment tables and the expenditure-responsibility statement; remaining return not fully read. The main form lists $4,533,333 paid and $2,266,667 approved for future payment. Recipient Pattern Labs Tech Inc., status NC. ER dates first grant payment March 5, 2024, lists $2,639,613 expended, report March 15, 2025, diversion NO and blank verification fields. Filing submitted May 2025 although fiscal year ended June 2024; report date is after fiscal year end. Do not treat the same repeated expenditure figure in the next return as additional expenditure. IRS 237-page image PDF captured through official TEOS; no machine-readable text, no claim to full PDF reading. Consequential facts read from IRS e-file public render.",
      "note": "Filed grant records and their legal framework; actual grantee report and signed grant agreement not obtained."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-s002",
      "title": "Good Ventures Foundation: Form 990-PF, fiscal year ending June 2025",
      "url": "https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full",
      "publisher": "Good Ventures Foundation / IRS filing via ProPublica",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2026-05-15",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Read the complete Pattern Labs main grant-paid row and expenditure-responsibility row with all ten column headings. The main form lists $2,266,667 paid. ER names Pattern Labs Tech Inc., grant amount $6,800,000, date March 5, 2024; its purpose cell explicitly says payments March 5, 2024 $4,533,333 and February 4, 2025 $2,266,667. Purpose: developing software tools, products and analysis focused on global security. It records $2,639,613 expended by grantee, report March 15, 2025, diversion NONE, verification date blank, verification result N/A. This is the foundation's reported oversight; not an independent audit or the report itself. It repeats FY2024's expenditure number/report date and supplies no newer report date in this row; do not infer current cash balance or noncompliance. No IP/reuse terms in these entries. IRS 266-page image PDF captured; page1 visually verified EIN, fiscal period July2024-June2025 and filing identity. Remaining PDF not read; substantive facts from IRS e-file public render.",
      "note": "Filed grant records and their legal framework; actual grantee report and signed grant agreement not obtained."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-s003",
      "title": "IRC Section 4945(h): expenditure responsibility",
      "url": "https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/irc-section-4945h-expenditure-responsibility",
      "publisher": "Internal Revenue Service",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full substantive IRS guidance read, sections legal basis, requirements and audit tips. Expenditure responsibility includes pregrant inquiry, signed commitment restricting funds to grant purpose, annual spending/progress reports, repayment of unused-for-purpose funds, available books/records and specified restrictions on lobbying/elections/regranting. IRS reporting includes amounts expended, report dates, diversion and verification. Foundation maintains agreements and received reports available to IRS. This explains a legal framework applicable to grants reported under ER, not the contents of Pattern Labs' unseen signed agreement. It does not establish a general prohibition on commercial reuse or require that these full reports be publicly posted.",
      "note": "General IRS requirements; not the text of the recipient-specific grant agreement."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-a-s01",
      "title": "Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research",
      "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3",
      "publisher": "DSIT / Contracts Finder",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-10-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main notice, all scope/award/date/procurement/supplier/attachment fields. Award/start17Sep2024; notice end16Jun2025 conflicts with attached order form optional expiry16Sep2025.",
      "note": "Distinct new-to-investigation GBP459000 award, tender_433902/1411931. Direct official HTTP capture. No payment attribution."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-a-s02",
      "title": "Redacted Documents Pattern labs.zip - Accessible Cyber Attacks contract6492",
      "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95",
      "publisher": "DSIT / Contracts Finder",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-10-04",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "ZIP inventory17 ODT/DOCX documents; all text extracted without executing contents. Full substantive read of Order Form and Schedules4(Tender),5(Pricing),9(Security),15(Contract Management),20(Specification); remaining documents inventory/keyword inspection only. No rendered-page/layout review.",
      "note": "Order reference6492. Specification assigns capability choice, evaluation design/justification, technical advice/Inspect access, feedback on DSIT products. Buyer sign-off/publication rights; all-output-data access for buyer QA. Actual accepted outputs/QA records/approved security plan absent. Tender and detailed pricing redacted. SAL AnnexB referenced, absent from ZIP. Operational-board conflict between Schedules20 and15. No exercise of extension established. Intro10Jul2024/blanksignature dates vs17Sepstart; attached optional end16Sep2025 vs notice16Jun2025."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-a-s06",
      "title": "Response: Participation in the conference on frontier AI safety frameworks (FOI2024-00441)",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks",
      "publisher": "DSIT / AI Safety Institute",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-10-07",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full main response and question context: selection criteria, disclosed organization list, closed-event status, capacity90, UK AISI/GovAI organizer/inquiry route.",
      "note": "Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy appear on one list line as separate organizations. Invitation-related disclosure, not attendance, standards role, or proof all listed organizations signed commitments. Response introductory signatories wording is not promoted over its question context."
    },
    {
      "id": "w50-a-s07",
      "title": "Response: Frontier AI Safety Framework Conference (FOI2024-00412)",
      "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference",
      "publisher": "DSIT",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "published": "2024-09-27",
      "accessed": "2026-09-19",
      "locator": "Full request/response: Nov21-22 invitation-only conference, primary/secondary audiences, withheld personal names, funding of travel criteria and inquiry route.",
      "note": "Read for context of follow-up00441; does not disclose contract deliverables/QA/security-plan evidence."
    },
    {
      "id": "w51-s-ofcom",
      "title": "Ofcom: uncorrected oral evidence, 15 September 2026",
      "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/18091/html/",
      "publisher": "UK Parliament",
      "published": "2026-09-17",
      "locator": "Header; Q38–45 and Q50–51. Hearing September 15; transcript uncorrected. Testimony, not a judicial interpretation.",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "accessed": "2026-09-20",
      "note": "Header; Q38–45 and Q50–51. Hearing September 15; transcript uncorrected. Testimony, not a judicial interpretation.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w51-s-ofcom",
        "title": "Ofcom: uncorrected oral evidence, 15 September 2026",
        "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/18091/html/",
        "publisher": "UK Parliament",
        "published": "2026-09-17",
        "locator": "Header; Q38–45 and Q50–51. Hearing September 15; transcript uncorrected. Testimony, not a judicial interpretation.",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "accessed": "2026-09-20",
        "note": "Header; Q38–45 and Q50–51. Hearing September 15; transcript uncorrected. Testimony, not a judicial interpretation.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Header; Q38–45 and Q50–51. Hearing September 15; transcript uncorrected. Testimony, not a judicial interpretation."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w51-s-clarity-vote",
      "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
      "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm",
      "publisher": "US Senate",
      "published": "2026-09-15",
      "locator": "Vote summary: 49–50, 3/5 required, cloture on motion to proceed rejected.",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "accessed": "2026-09-20",
      "note": "Vote summary: 49–50, 3/5 required, cloture on motion to proceed rejected.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w51-s-clarity-vote",
        "title": "Senate roll call 234: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633",
        "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm",
        "publisher": "US Senate",
        "published": "2026-09-15",
        "locator": "Vote summary: 49–50, 3/5 required, cloture on motion to proceed rejected.",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "accessed": "2026-09-20",
        "note": "Vote summary: 49–50, 3/5 required, cloture on motion to proceed rejected.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Vote summary: 49–50, 3/5 required, cloture on motion to proceed rejected."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w51-s-clarity-floor",
      "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
      "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm",
      "publisher": "US Senate",
      "published": "2026-09-15",
      "locator": "H.R. 3633 legislative-business entries: rejected cloture; Tillis reconsideration entered.",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "accessed": "2026-09-20",
      "note": "H.R. 3633 legislative-business entries: rejected cloture; Tillis reconsideration entered.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w51-s-clarity-floor",
        "title": "Senate floor activity, 15 September 2026",
        "url": "https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm",
        "publisher": "US Senate",
        "published": "2026-09-15",
        "locator": "H.R. 3633 legislative-business entries: rejected cloture; Tillis reconsideration entered.",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "accessed": "2026-09-20",
        "note": "H.R. 3633 legislative-business entries: rejected cloture; Tillis reconsideration entered.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "H.R. 3633 legislative-business entries: rejected cloture; Tillis reconsideration entered."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w51-s-scott",
      "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
      "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote",
      "publisher": "Senate Banking Committee majority",
      "published": "2026-09-15",
      "locator": "Chairman's response advocates SEC/CFTC rulemaking; an interested political statement, not delegated agency authority.",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "accessed": "2026-09-20",
      "note": "Chairman's response advocates SEC/CFTC rulemaking; an interested political statement, not delegated agency authority.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w51-s-scott",
        "title": "Scott statement on CLARITY Act vote",
        "url": "https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote",
        "publisher": "Senate Banking Committee majority",
        "published": "2026-09-15",
        "locator": "Chairman's response advocates SEC/CFTC rulemaking; an interested political statement, not delegated agency authority.",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "accessed": "2026-09-20",
        "note": "Chairman's response advocates SEC/CFTC rulemaking; an interested political statement, not delegated agency authority.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Chairman's response advocates SEC/CFTC rulemaking; an interested political statement, not delegated agency authority."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "w51-s-pdc",
      "title": "UK Payments Delivery Company launches equity capital raise",
      "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/uk-payments-delivery-company-launches-equity-capital-raise",
      "publisher": "UK Finance",
      "published": "2026-09-15",
      "locator": "Release and notes-to-editor: launched process; 19 mobilisation supporters; EY administration; nonbinding EOI and discretionary participation. No subscribed total or shareholder terms.",
      "kind": "Primary record",
      "accessed": "2026-09-20",
      "note": "Release and notes-to-editor: launched process; 19 mobilisation supporters; EY administration; nonbinding EOI and discretionary participation. No subscribed total or shareholder terms.",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "w51-s-pdc",
        "title": "UK Payments Delivery Company launches equity capital raise",
        "url": "https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/uk-payments-delivery-company-launches-equity-capital-raise",
        "publisher": "UK Finance",
        "published": "2026-09-15",
        "locator": "Release and notes-to-editor: launched process; 19 mobilisation supporters; EY administration; nonbinding EOI and discretionary participation. No subscribed total or shareholder terms.",
        "kind": "Primary record",
        "accessed": "2026-09-20",
        "note": "Release and notes-to-editor: launched process; 19 mobilisation supporters; EY administration; nonbinding EOI and discretionary participation. No subscribed total or shareholder terms.",
        "state": "read",
        "readScope": "Release and notes-to-editor: launched process; 19 mobilisation supporters; EY administration; nonbinding EOI and discretionary participation. No subscribed total or shareholder terms."
      }
    }
  ],
  "stories": [
    {
      "id": "permission",
      "number": "01",
      "gate": "payments",
      "title": "The decision behind the payment gate",
      "dek": "A risk record, an implementation choice, and a separate route back.",
      "duration": "3 min",
      "node": "stripe",
      "edges": [
        "ed2-mc-match",
        "ed2-acq-match",
        "ed2-stripe-match",
        "ed2-stripe-merchants",
        "ed2-match-correction",
        "ed2-correction-acquirer"
      ],
      "claim": "Access can depend on an upstream record that the affected business cannot simply edit.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Locate the record",
          "text": "Mastercard’s MATCH and Visa’s VMSS sit upstream of processor decisions.",
          "edge": "ed2-mc-match"
        },
        {
          "title": "Find the decision-maker",
          "text": "Stripe’s documentation describes general disqualification of listed merchants, with limited exceptions.",
          "edge": "ed2-stripe-merchants"
        },
        {
          "title": "Follow the return route",
          "text": "Correction goes through the listing acquirer under specific conditions.",
          "edge": "ed2-correction-acquirer"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Ask who must act, and in what order, before a business can transact again. That is a practical power question, not just a debate about speech.",
      "alternative": "Shared screening may prevent fraud and protect other participants. That rationale must be evaluated alongside false positives, proportionality, and remedy.",
      "test": "A complete named case would need the initial record, the processor decision, the correction request, and the actual restoration outcome.",
      "recourse": "A correction procedure is documented. A successful restoration for any named merchant is not included in this opening case."
    },
    {
      "id": "capability",
      "number": "02",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "From technical work to public prohibition",
      "dek": "Walk between people, organisations, and a precisely scoped policy demand.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "controlai",
      "edges": [
        "ed2-ca-connor",
        "e93",
        "ed2-el-connor",
        "ed2-ca-proposal",
        "ed2-ca-briefs"
      ],
      "claim": "A capability debate becomes a power question when the proposal is to prohibit development.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Start with the people",
          "text": "Connor Leahy connects the published ControlAI leadership roster to Conjecture’s founding history.",
          "edge": "ed2-ca-connor"
        },
        {
          "title": "Keep the institutions distinct",
          "text": "Conjecture’s founding history and ControlAI’s political proposal are separate records. A shared person does not merge their decision rights.",
          "edge": "e93"
        },
        {
          "title": "Read the actual demand",
          "text": "ControlAI advocates prohibiting superintelligence and reports briefing lawmakers. Advocacy is not enacted law.",
          "edge": "ed2-ca-proposal"
        }
      ],
      "why": "The issue is not whether a speaker uses the word “safety.” It is what capability is restricted, by whom, with which exceptions, and who retains it.",
      "alternative": "The advocates may genuinely prioritise preventing catastrophic harm. To show incumbent protection or concealed coordination requires additional records.",
      "test": "Compare the proposed rule’s thresholds, exemptions, enforcement powers, beneficiaries, and treatment of decentralised alternatives.",
      "recourse": "These opening records describe advocacy and organisational roles. Continue into the full corpus to examine particular proposals, safeguards and responses."
    },
    {
      "id": "identity",
      "number": "03",
      "gate": "identity",
      "title": "When access becomes a check",
      "dek": "Separate the law, regulatory guidance, implementation, and the person at the gate.",
      "duration": "3 min",
      "node": "ofcom",
      "edges": [
        "ed2-osa-ofcom",
        "ed2-ofcom-guidance",
        "ed2-services-checks",
        "ed2-checks-users",
        "ed2-checks-id",
        "ed2-checks-estimate"
      ],
      "claim": "An access condition can add an intermediary between a person and a lawful activity.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Locate authority",
          "text": "Ofcom’s January 2025 publication explains its implementation of the Online Safety Act.",
          "edge": "ed2-osa-ofcom"
        },
        {
          "title": "Locate implementation",
          "text": "Covered services face age-assurance duties; scope and timetable vary.",
          "edge": "ed2-services-checks"
        },
        {
          "title": "Inspect what the gate measures",
          "text": "Photo ID matching and age estimation are different methods. Age assurance does not always establish identity.",
          "edge": "ed2-checks-estimate"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Audit what is collected, who receives it, what is retained, how errors are corrected, and whether alternative methods remain usable.",
      "alternative": "Protecting children is the stated objective, and the guidance expressly protects privacy and lawful adult access. Evaluate actual implementations against those commitments.",
      "test": "A claim of universal identity tracking needs implementation and data-flow evidence, not just the existence of an age check.",
      "recourse": "The guidance’s safeguards are recorded. A named implementation’s error rate or appeal outcome is not loaded."
    },
    {
      "id": "distribution",
      "number": "04",
      "gate": "distribution",
      "title": "A platform’s rule is another gate",
      "dek": "Publishing, discoverability, and access are separate practical capabilities.",
      "duration": "2 min",
      "node": "ed2-youtube",
      "edges": [
        "ed2-yt-publishes",
        "ed2-yt-applies",
        "ed2-yt-gates"
      ],
      "claim": "A platform can make access conditional without changing the underlying law.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Find the rule",
          "text": "YouTube publishes content rules.",
          "edge": "ed2-yt-publishes"
        },
        {
          "title": "Find the access condition",
          "text": "Its policy describes age restrictions and contextual exceptions.",
          "edge": "ed2-yt-applies"
        },
        {
          "title": "Ask who is excluded",
          "text": "Age-restricted videos require an eligible age and sign-in.",
          "edge": "ed2-yt-gates"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Distinguish being permitted to create something from being able to distribute it and reach an audience.",
      "alternative": "Moderation may protect users and preserve a service. The relevant questions include consistency, specificity, competition, and meaningful recourse.",
      "test": "A named case requires the content, policy version, decision notice, appeal record, and final disposition.",
      "recourse": "This slice does not include a specific enforcement appeal. Do not substitute a general policy for an outcome."
    },
    {
      "id": "map-oakfunding",
      "number": "M01",
      "node": "oak",
      "title": "Oak’s grants to five organisations",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.",
      "claim": "Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.",
      "why": "Reported awards are not annual expenditure or payment receipts. Contracting Oak entities and grant-specific terms remain limited. No traced allocation from Oak to the later Liberty case is established.",
      "edges": [
        "e160",
        "e161",
        "w31-fa-e-oakcma",
        "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch",
        "w31-fa-e-oakdff"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e160",
          "title": "$2m award / 3 years",
          "text": "Core-support award in the 2023 report; not an annual payment."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e161",
          "title": "$2.368m award / 3 years",
          "text": "Exact award $2,368,421, core support. Not proof of a one-time cash receipt or the whole funding of WeProtect."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-oakcma",
          "title": "reported a three-year core grant",
          "text": "Oak's2025 report lists USD600000 over three years for CMA core support promoting transparency and fairness in digital advertising. Award is not annual expenditure, cash payment, exact grant-start date, or an earmark to the Ofcom response. Oak contracting group entity is unspecified. Financial details: value: 600,000; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact term dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Printed grantee is Check My Ads; row does not supply EIN or contracting Oak entity."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch",
          "title": "reported a three-year information and analysis grant",
          "text": "Oak2025 lists USD303622 over three years for Statewatch news/information/analysis on EU justice and home-affairs spending. The row does not label this core support. No exact term, payment or funding of its earlier2023 stance is established. Financial details: value: 303,622; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Exact contracting Oak entity and legal recipient identifiers not supplied by row."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-oakdff",
          "title": "reported three-year core support",
          "text": "Oak2025 lists USD631579 over three years of DFF core support for digital rights in Europe. No traced earmark to Liberty, specific case-payment or authority over selection is established. Financial details: value: 631,579; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Contracting Oak group entity and precise recipient legal identifier not supplied by row."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Reported awards are not annual expenditure or payment receipts. Contracting Oak entities and grant-specific terms remain limited. No traced allocation from Oak to the later Liberty case is established.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/oakfunding",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "oakfunding",
        "title": "Oak’s grants to five organisations",
        "description": "Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.",
        "boundary": "Reported awards are not annual expenditure or payment receipts. Contracting Oak entities and grant-specific terms remain limited. No traced allocation from Oak to the later Liberty case is established.",
        "topic": "Resources & divergence",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "oak",
            "title": "Oak Foundation",
            "sub": "Three-year awards; cash unverified",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "5rights",
            "title": "5Rights",
            "sub": "USD 2,000,000 · 3 years · 2023 award",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "weprotect",
            "title": "WeProtect",
            "sub": "USD 2,368,421 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "USD 600,000 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-statewatch",
            "title": "Statewatch",
            "sub": "USD 303,622 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dff",
            "title": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "sub": "USD 631,579 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              5,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e160",
          "e161",
          "w31-fa-e-oakcma",
          "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch",
          "w31-fa-e-oakdff"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-divergence",
      "number": "M02",
      "node": "wp-secretariat",
      "title": "Where Oak-funded organisations disagree",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Statewatch endorsed a CSA objection and an OSA safeguards letter. The WeProtect Secretariat supported the CSA initiative with safeguards. DFF separately reports funding Liberty’s TCN challenge.",
      "claim": "Statewatch endorsed a CSA objection and an OSA safeguards letter. The WeProtect Secretariat supported the CSA initiative with safeguards. DFF separately reports funding Liberty’s TCN challenge.",
      "why": "The CSA positions concern different dates/drafts. Statewatch’s 2023 objection predates the 2025 Oak grant. TCN litigation concerns IPA powers, not an OSA/age-ID case. Later governance and procedural records are now accessible in the DFF and court views; no merits or grant-payment result is inferred.",
      "edges": [
        "n25",
        "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse",
        "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition",
        "w31-fa-e-swlettersign",
        "w31-fa-e-swrequest",
        "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
        "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "n25",
          "title": "Published supporting consultation",
          "text": "The published submission supports detection obligations and safeguards. It expressly need not represent the membership's positions."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse",
          "title": "published and endorsed a proposal objection",
          "text": "Statewatch identifies itself among signatories to the EDRi-coordinated statement published13September2023. Claims about scanning, identity checks and rights are the statement's position, not independently verified law."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition",
          "title": "opposed agreement without stronger rights/security safeguards",
          "text": "The2023 statement objects to EUCSA proposal provisions on broad scanning and potential identity requirements. Existing WeProtect Secretariat support concerns an undated earlier record with2022 membership figures; comparison is issue orientation across dates/drafts, not a common final vote."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-swlettersign",
          "title": "was a signatory to a published safeguards letter",
          "text": "Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-swrequest",
          "title": "requested clarification, transparency and conditional remedies",
          "text": "The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
          "title": "reported EUR36000 litigation support",
          "text": "DFF's linked case page reports Liberty, EUR36000, Litigation Track Support; the dated announcement places the grant in the June2026 round. Exact term, payment and agreement conditions remain not obtained; trailing inconsistent recipient field is preserved as anomaly. Financial details: value: 36,000; currency: EUR; kind: reported litigation-support grant; period: June2026 round; grant term unknown Payment status: unverified"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge",
          "title": "was described as pursuing a TCN-regime challenge",
          "text": "DFF describes Liberty's ongoing challenge to the IPA2016TCN regime concerning compelled encryption access and rights. No court pleading, actual notice or judicial outcome was within the accepted two-record DFF source wave; later proceedings remain outside this candidate. This is separate from the Online Safety Act and age-assurance proposals."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The CSA positions concern different dates/drafts. Statewatch’s 2023 objection predates the 2025 Oak grant. TCN litigation concerns IPA powers, not an OSA/age-ID case. Later governance and procedural records are now accessible in the DFF and court views; no merits or grant-payment result is inferred.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/divergence",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "divergence",
        "title": "Where Oak-funded organisations disagree",
        "description": "Statewatch endorsed a CSA objection and an OSA safeguards letter. The WeProtect Secretariat supported the CSA initiative with safeguards. DFF separately reports funding Liberty’s TCN challenge.",
        "boundary": "The CSA positions concern different dates/drafts. Statewatch’s 2023 objection predates the 2025 Oak grant. TCN litigation concerns IPA powers, not an OSA/age-ID case. Later governance and procedural records are now accessible in the DFF and court views; no merits or grant-payment result is inferred.",
        "topic": "Resources & divergence",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "wp-secretariat",
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "sub": "Supports CSA initiative; Secretariat only",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "eu-csa-proposal",
            "title": "EU CSA proposal",
            "sub": "Different dates and draft contexts",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-swcsa",
            "title": "CSA objection · 2023",
            "sub": "Rights/security safeguards requested",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-statewatch",
            "title": "Statewatch",
            "sub": "Dated objections and safeguards",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dff",
            "title": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "sub": "Core grant; separate case allocation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
            "title": "Liberty",
            "sub": "Reported €36,000 litigation grant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-tcn",
            "title": "TCN challenge",
            "sub": "IPA regime; separate from OSA",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-swletter",
            "title": "OSA safeguards letter",
            "sub": "Published 4 August 2025",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "n25",
          "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse",
          "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition",
          "w31-fa-e-swlettersign",
          "w31-fa-e-swrequest",
          "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
          "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-fundingselection",
      "number": "M03",
      "node": "w31-fa-villum",
      "title": "Who selects and authorises grants",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Named grants establish resources; KR’s statutes establish internal selection and appointment rights. CMA’s two funding charts describe a changed mix without explaining its cause.",
      "claim": "Named grants establish resources; KR’s statutes establish internal selection and appointment rights. CMA’s two funding charts describe a changed mix without explaining its cause.",
      "why": "Ford approval, KR awards and Democracy Fund paid-schedule reports are different money states. Democracy row amounts are withheld here pending visual alignment. Chart percentages are not a dollar budget, cash balance or proof that a donor chose a tactic.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-krappointments",
        "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
        "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
        "w31-fa-e-ford2022",
        "w31-fa-e-democracy2024",
        "w31-fa-e-mix2024",
        "w31-fa-e-mix2025",
        "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
        "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
        "w31-fa-e-krelections"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-krappointments",
          "title": "may appoint up to two directors",
          "text": "VILLUM FONDEN may appoint up to two of a five-to-seven-person board; the remaining directors are board-elected. This is an appointment right, not evidence of a coordinated bloc or individual grant veto."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
          "title": "decides distribution, eligibility, scale and timing",
          "text": "Statutes assign distribution and award decisions to KR's board, permitting defined delegation to chairmanship/executive director. No namedCMA vote or intervention-specific approval right is disclosed."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
          "title": "reported a climate/election disinformation grant",
          "text": "Donor-authored2023 report lists DKK1991232, term1May2023–1May2025, to cut climate-change and election disinformation off at the source. Not a traced allocation to the February2025 child-safety letters. Financial details: value: 1,991,232; currency: DKK; kind: reported grant; period: 1May2023–1May2025 Payment status: unverified"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ford2022",
          "title": "approved general support",
          "text": "Ford reports USD200000 General Support, approvedOctober2022 for October2022–September2023. This is an approved award, not payment or support earmarked to a later2025 campaign. Financial details: value: 200,000; currency: USD; kind: approved grant; period: October2022–September2023 Payment status: unverified"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-democracy2024",
          "title": "reported paid general support",
          "text": "The donor's2024 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD250000 is a reader/discovery candidate with unverified visual row alignment; this record carries no precise amount or exact payment date."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-mix2024",
          "title": "reported a funding-source chart",
          "text": "CMA's2024 graphic labels major donors59, foundations30 and individuals11. These chart values have no explicit percent sign or dollar denominator; 490 recurring donors and the separate Checkmates60/one-time40 chart are distinct measures."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-mix2025",
          "title": "reported foundation grants as 82.8 percent",
          "text": "CMA's2025 chart explicitly reports foundation grants82.8%, major donors12.3% and individuals4.9%, with four new institutional donors and three multiyear renewals. No absolute revenue or causal explanation for the shift is supplied."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
          "title": "reported paid general support",
          "text": "The donor's2023 paid-grant schedule names CMA for General Support. USD450000 is a reader/discovery candidate whose row alignment was not visually verified, so no precise amount is encoded. A separate future-payment entry is not a second payment."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
          "title": "listed a later grant term",
          "text": "KR's public2025 list records CMA, US,1April2025–1April2027. Amount, purpose and payment are not disclosed in this list; the2023 amount/purpose are not carried forward."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-krelections",
          "title": "elects remaining directors under a dissent limit",
          "text": "Election of remaining directors requires a majority with no more than one dissent. Two eligible dissenting votes can block that election; ordinary decisions use a simple majority and chair casting vote. No actual vote is reconstructed."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Ford approval, KR awards and Democracy Fund paid-schedule reports are different money states. Democracy row amounts are withheld here pending visual alignment. Chart percentages are not a dollar budget, cash balance or proof that a donor chose a tactic.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/fundingselection",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "fundingselection",
        "title": "Who selects and authorises grants",
        "description": "Named grants establish resources; KR’s statutes establish internal selection and appointment rights. CMA’s two funding charts describe a changed mix without explaining its cause.",
        "boundary": "Ford approval, KR awards and Democracy Fund paid-schedule reports are different money states. Democracy row amounts are withheld here pending visual alignment. Chart percentages are not a dollar budget, cash balance or proof that a donor chose a tactic.",
        "topic": "Resources & divergence",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-villum",
            "title": "VILLUM FONDEN",
            "sub": "Up to two board appointments",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-krboard",
            "title": "KR board",
            "sub": "Distribution and grant decisions",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-kr",
            "title": "KR Foundation",
            "sub": "Dated climate/election grant",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Funding and advocacy are distinct",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ford",
            "title": "Ford Foundation",
            "sub": "Approved general support, 2022",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-democracy",
            "title": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
            "sub": "Reported paid rows; amounts unresolved",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-mix2024",
            "title": "CMA funding · 2024",
            "sub": "59 / 30 / 11 chart values",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-mix2025",
            "title": "CMA funding · 2025",
            "sub": "82.8% foundation grants",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-krappointments",
          "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
          "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
          "w31-fa-e-ford2022",
          "w31-fa-e-democracy2024",
          "w31-fa-e-mix2024",
          "w31-fa-e-mix2025",
          "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
          "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
          "w31-fa-e-krelections"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-cmaasks",
      "number": "M04",
      "node": "w30-class-cma",
      "title": "Check My Ads: requests and responses",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "CMA asks for creator/advertiser checks, platform review before monetization and sanctions. Its crisis revenue/refund proposal has an explicit regulator response: specific monetization practices were not recommended.",
      "claim": "CMA asks for creator/advertiser checks, platform review before monetization and sanctions. Its crisis revenue/refund proposal has an explicit regulator response: specific monetization practices were not recommended.",
      "why": "These checks concern monetized creators and advertisers, not every viewer. The disposition of other recommendations is unresolved in the accepted source wave; no enacted universal ID, actual ban, refund or automated decision is inferred.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
        "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
        "w31-fa-e-checks",
        "w31-fa-e-clearance",
        "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
        "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
        "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
        "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
          "title": "provided a consultation response",
          "text": "Ofcom hosts CMA's31-page additional-safety response. The11December2025 listing date is not an independently established submission date."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
          "title": "submitted proposals for additional safety measures",
          "text": "CMA asked Ofcom to address monetization incentives, verification and sanctions. Receipt/publication does not establish adoption of each recommendation."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-checks",
          "title": "requested verification of creators and advertisers",
          "text": "KYC/KYBC proposals cover creators and advertisers, payment/location signals and repeat violators. No universal viewer-ID rule, prescribed identity document or technical identity database is specified."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-clearance",
          "title": "requested withholding monetization pending platform assessment",
          "text": "CMA would require a monetization decision where risk indicators suggest illegal content, with clearance by provider systems/manual review; a court ruling is not the proposed trigger."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
          "title": "requested return bans, repeat-violator sanctions and clawbacks",
          "text": "CMA requests return prevention for specified adultCSAM offenders, permanent bans of repeat illegal monetizers and advertiser clawbacks. Account access and revenue sanctions are distinct; implementation unverified."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
          "title": "requested crisis monetization controls and conditional refunds",
          "text": "CMA proposed crisis revenue information, monetization changes and refunds where possible, not a guarantee of reimbursement in every case."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
          "title": "declined to recommend specific monetization practices",
          "text": "Ofcom explicitly records CMA's revenue/refund request and declines to recommend specific monetization practices for the crisis protocol. Providers retain proportionate advertising-integrity choices; this does not decide CMA's other proposals."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast",
          "title": "forecast remaining additional-measures decisions for autumn2026",
          "text": "The current scoped roadmap forecasts remaining decisions, while the crisis decision is already published. Neither the forecast nor the September9 issued-code index resolves all CMA proposals or crisis commencement."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "These checks concern monetized creators and advertisers, not every viewer. The disposition of other recommendations is unresolved in the accepted source wave; no enacted universal ID, actual ban, refund or automated decision is inferred.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/cmaasks",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "cmaasks",
        "title": "Check My Ads: requests and responses",
        "description": "CMA asks for creator/advertiser checks, platform review before monetization and sanctions. Its crisis revenue/refund proposal has an explicit regulator response: specific monetization practices were not recommended.",
        "boundary": "These checks concern monetized creators and advertisers, not every viewer. The disposition of other recommendations is unresolved in the accepted source wave; no enacted universal ID, actual ban, refund or automated decision is inferred.",
        "topic": "Requests & dispositions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Funding and advocacy are distinct",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-cmasub",
            "title": "CMA response · 2025",
            "sub": "Listed December; submission day unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
            "title": "Crisis revenue / refunds",
            "sub": "Specific practices not recommended",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
            "title": "Creator / advertiser checks",
            "sub": "Proposal; not universal viewer ID",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-premonetization",
            "title": "Pre-monetization review",
            "sub": "Platform assessment before clearance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-sanctions",
            "title": "Bans and clawbacks",
            "sub": "Requested; implementation unverified",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
          "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
          "w31-fa-e-checks",
          "w31-fa-e-clearance",
          "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
          "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
          "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
          "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-ffasks",
      "number": "M05",
      "node": "w31-fa-fullfact",
      "title": "Full Fact: requested access and official responses",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Full Fact seeks broader crisis scope, meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers and stronger supervision. Ofcom retains a narrower formal channel and declines central coordination and routine submission of every analysis.",
      "claim": "Full Fact seeks broader crisis scope, meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers and stronger supervision. Ofcom retains a narrower formal channel and declines central coordination and routine submission of every analysis.",
      "why": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate fact-checker partnerships. Class-level protocol decisions are not rejection of every data-access request, nor a new right for Full Fact to direct a platform.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
        "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
        "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
        "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
        "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
        "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
        "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
        "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
          "title": "published a dated consultation response",
          "text": "Full Fact's response is dated17October2025 on PDF20 and later listed11December. The response cannot establish its participation in the earlier August meeting."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
          "title": "made consultation requests",
          "text": "Full Fact requested broader scope, coordination, oversight and access, with expression and proportionality arguments. Publication and citation are not a grant of those powers."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
          "title": "requested broader crisis and legislative scope",
          "text": "Paragraph76 aligns scope with s175 health/national-security language; paragraphs77–79 seek evidence/severity/transparent criteria. Separate systemic-misinformation legislative review is acknowledged as beyond this consultation."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
          "title": "requested meaningful access for accredited fact-checkers",
          "text": "Full Fact explicitly recognizes that Ofcom cannot mandate platform fact-checker partnerships, then seeks meaningful data access and consequences for failure. A requested institutional benefit is not an actual entitlement."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
          "title": "requested coordination and stronger accountability",
          "text": "Requests include Ofcom coordination, notifications, evidence logs, oversight, public summaries and regular submission of analyses. Requested safeguards do not establish an executed return/appeal process."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "title": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
          "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "title": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
          "text": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "title": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
          "text": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate fact-checker partnerships. Class-level protocol decisions are not rejection of every data-access request, nor a new right for Full Fact to direct a platform.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/ffasks",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ffasks",
        "title": "Full Fact: requested access and official responses",
        "description": "Full Fact seeks broader crisis scope, meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers and stronger supervision. Ofcom retains a narrower formal channel and declines central coordination and routine submission of every analysis.",
        "boundary": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate fact-checker partnerships. Class-level protocol decisions are not rejection of every data-access request, nor a new right for Full Fact to direct a platform.",
        "topic": "Requests & dispositions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-fullfact",
            "title": "Full Fact",
            "sub": "Respondent seeking scope and access",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffsub",
            "title": "Full Fact response",
            "sub": "Dated 17 October 2025",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffscope",
            "title": "Broader crisis scope",
            "sub": "Request, with safeguards",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffaccess",
            "title": "Fact-checker data access",
            "sub": "Requested role; not a granted right",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffoversight",
            "title": "Stronger supervision",
            "sub": "Requested records and coordination",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
          "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
          "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
          "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
          "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-noticeinputs",
      "number": "M06",
      "node": "w31-fa-ffsub",
      "title": "How Full Fact’s input changed a notice indicator",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Ofcom attributes the notice-indicator amendment to Full Fact’s response and questions at an earlier DSIT meeting. Its FOI answer separately reports initial planning and a May 2026 approval window.",
      "claim": "Ofcom attributes the notice-indicator amendment to Full Fact’s response and questions at an earlier DSIT meeting. Its FOI answer separately reports initial planning and a May 2026 approval window.",
      "why": "The response is dated October 2025; the meeting was in August. No Full Fact attendance or initiation is inferred. Record existence and an approval window do not reveal the underlying minute, draft edits or approver’s terms.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
        "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
        "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
        "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting",
        "w31-fa-e-planningreported",
        "w31-fa-e-approvalreported",
        "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
        "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
        "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
        "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
          "title": "was cited as an input to a recommendation amendment",
          "text": "Ofcom says it amended recommendations in response to Full Factp17 and earlier DSIT-meeting questions. This establishes regulator-attributed contribution, not exclusive authorship or verbatim adoption of Full Fact's scope language."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
          "title": "was cited as another input to the amendment",
          "text": "Ofcom cites questions at a4August2025 meeting with DSIT alongside Full Fact's later response. No minute supplies the question text, attendees or allocated drafting role."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
          "title": "added consideration of a ministerial-notice indicator",
          "text": "Ofcom's attributed amendment requires considering the notice alongside other indicators. It does not transfer the provider's crisis determination wholesale to Full Fact, DSIT or the Secretary."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting",
          "title": "reported a meeting with DSIT",
          "text": "The regulator's published footnote identifies a4August2025 meeting; that record does not establish Full Fact attendance or initiation."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-planningreported",
          "title": "confirmed an initial planning document and chronology",
          "text": "FOI02210914 says work began23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary correspondence. This is agency confirmation, not acquisition of those letters or the plan contents."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-approvalreported",
          "title": "reported a final approval window",
          "text": "The same FOI response identifies21–26May2026 as final approval. It does not supply a signed approval, approver identity or veto conditions. Its separate no-either/or-choice answer does not mean no approval brief exists."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
          "title": "made consultation requests",
          "text": "Full Fact requested broader scope, coordination, oversight and access, with expression and proportionality arguments. Publication and citation are not a grant of those powers."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "title": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
          "text": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "title": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
          "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "title": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
          "text": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The response is dated October 2025; the meeting was in August. No Full Fact attendance or initiation is inferred. Record existence and an approval window do not reveal the underlying minute, draft edits or approver’s terms.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/noticeinputs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "noticeinputs",
        "title": "How Full Fact’s input changed a notice indicator",
        "description": "Ofcom attributes the notice-indicator amendment to Full Fact’s response and questions at an earlier DSIT meeting. Its FOI answer separately reports initial planning and a May 2026 approval window.",
        "boundary": "The response is dated October 2025; the meeting was in August. No Full Fact attendance or initiation is inferred. Record existence and an approval window do not reveal the underlying minute, draft edits or approver’s terms.",
        "topic": "Requests & dispositions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffsub",
            "title": "Full Fact response",
            "sub": "Dated 17 October 2025",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-noticechange",
            "title": "Notice indicator amendment",
            "sub": "Ofcom attributes two input routes",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
            "title": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting",
            "sub": "4 August 2025; minute outside this wave",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-planning",
            "title": "Initial planning record",
            "sub": "Existence and chronology confirmed",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-approval",
            "title": "Approval window",
            "sub": "21–26 May 2026, agency reported",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
          "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
          "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
          "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting",
          "w31-fa-e-planningreported",
          "w31-fa-e-approvalreported",
          "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-ministerial",
      "number": "M07",
      "node": "w31-fa-secretary",
      "title": "Ministers, Ofcom and crisis notices",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Section 175 gives the Secretary a direction route through Ofcom. A notice can require a public statement and information. The provider’s criteria-based crisis determination remains a separate decision.",
      "claim": "Section 175 gives the Secretary a direction route through Ofcom. A notice can require a public statement and information. The provider’s criteria-based crisis determination remains a separate decision.",
      "why": "This enacted-text source is not a fresh consolidated-law/commencement audit. No particular notice or provider response is shown. It does not establish a direct power to order removal of any specified lawful post.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
        "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
        "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
        "w31-fa-e-information",
        "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
        "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
        "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
        "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
        "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
        "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke",
        "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
        "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
          "title": "may require public statement notices",
          "text": "Enacted s175(1),(3) permits direction to Ofcom to issue a notice to a specified provider or providers generally. It compels a public-accounting route, not on this text a direction to remove any specified lawful post."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
          "title": "must issue a notice under a qualifying direction",
          "text": "A direction under s175(3) requires Ofcom to give a public statement notice. No particular direction, notice or recipient was acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
          "title": "can require a public statement by a specified date",
          "text": "A public statement notice requires the provider to describe steps taken in response to the threat by the specified date; publication is not itself a takedown command."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-information",
          "title": "may require threat-response information",
          "text": "Under s175(5), Ofcom may use the public statement notice or a subsequent notice to require information needed to respond to the threat. Actual information demanded and ensuing provider behavior remain unknown."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
          "title": "determines activation using relevant criteria",
          "text": "The provider determines a crisis and chooses systems; action is as soon as reasonably practicable. A ministerial public statement notice is considered alongside indicators, not an automatic switch."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "title": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
          "text": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
          "title": "recommends criteria-based crisis processes",
          "text": "Providers use seriousUK-public-safety and relevant illegal/child-harm content indicators to determine a crisis, including linked overseas/local events. The framework is not a free-standing general misinformation intervention power."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
          "title": "may direct media-literacy priorities for a specified period",
          "text": "On reasonable grounds for the specified public-health/safety or national-security threat, enacted s175(2) permits direction of media-literacy priorities. This is separate from content removal or the public-statement route."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
          "title": "must publish reasons for health/safety-ground directions",
          "text": "Section175(6) requires publication of reasons for a direction on public-health/safety grounds. The same subsection does not impose that duty for the national-security ground."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke",
          "title": "may vary or revoke the direction",
          "text": "Section175(7) permits variation/revocation; under(8) Ofcom may consequentially vary/revoke a public statement notice. No revocation or automatic restoration of content is established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "title": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
          "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "title": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
          "text": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "This enacted-text source is not a fresh consolidated-law/commencement audit. No particular notice or provider response is shown. It does not establish a direct power to order removal of any specified lawful post.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/ministerial",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ministerial",
        "title": "Ministers, Ofcom and crisis notices",
        "description": "Section 175 gives the Secretary a direction route through Ofcom. A notice can require a public statement and information. The provider’s criteria-based crisis determination remains a separate decision.",
        "boundary": "This enacted-text source is not a fresh consolidated-law/commencement audit. No particular notice or provider response is shown. It does not establish a direct power to order removal of any specified lawful post.",
        "topic": "Authority & records",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-secretary",
            "title": "Secretary of State",
            "sub": "Section 175 statutory role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-notice",
            "title": "Public statement notice",
            "sub": "Explanation and information route",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-providers",
            "title": "In-scope providers",
            "sub": "Determine crisis using criteria",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
          "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
          "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
          "w31-fa-e-information",
          "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
          "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
          "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
          "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-providerrecords",
      "number": "M08",
      "node": "w31-fa-indicators",
      "title": "Who acts on a crisis—and who records it",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Signals inform the provider, which determines activation and assembles its team. Large services have a specific police-channel recommendation. Providers retain analyses; Ofcom can seek them.",
      "claim": "Signals inform the provider, which determines activation and assembles its team. Large services have a specific police-channel recommendation. Providers retain analyses; Ofcom can seek them.",
      "why": "The channel does not replace legal data-request processes. Existing appeals, accuracy, privacy and expression safeguards remain. A 90-day protocol/analysis clock is not a promise to restore removed posts or accounts.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-inputs",
        "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
        "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
        "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
        "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords",
        "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
        "w31-fa-e-retainappeals",
        "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
        "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
        "w31-fa-e-information",
        "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
        "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
        "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-inputs",
          "title": "may inform a provider determination",
          "text": "External and internal signals can inform the provider, including NGOs without trusted-flagger status. No named NGO is selected, and no indicator automatically activates a crisis."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
          "title": "determines activation using relevant criteria",
          "text": "The provider determines a crisis and chooses systems; action is as soon as reasonably practicable. A ministerial public statement notice is considered alongside indicators, not an automatic switch."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
          "title": "assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team",
          "text": "The recommendation places operational coordination inside a provider-selected senior cross-functional team; no public appointment of a named NGO or government officer into it is established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
          "title": "would operate a conditional incoming-information channel",
          "text": "The channel is for fast crisis information into large services. Existing legal processes for routine data requests remain; Ofcom disclaims general power here to compel disclosure to police."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords",
          "title": "would retain post-crisis analysis and key records",
          "text": "The statement recommends ending the protocol when criteria end or at90days, sooner, then analysis/records. Continuing risks shift to ordinary operations; this is not a90-day restoration promise."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
          "title": "may seek records for supervision",
          "text": "Providers retain records and Ofcom may seek them or ask about activation; no universal routine public/submitted ledger was adopted. No particular suppressed record or request is established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-retainappeals",
          "title": "retains existing appeal, expression and privacy safeguards",
          "text": "Existing moderation/reporting/appeal, privacy and expression protections remain; no free-standing universal crisis appeal is created. Accuracy safeguards coexist with acknowledged possible false positives."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "title": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
          "text": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
          "title": "recommends criteria-based crisis processes",
          "text": "Providers use seriousUK-public-safety and relevant illegal/child-harm content indicators to determine a crisis, including linked overseas/local events. The framework is not a free-standing general misinformation intervention power."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-information",
          "title": "may require threat-response information",
          "text": "Under s175(5), Ofcom may use the public statement notice or a subsequent notice to require information needed to respond to the threat. Actual information demanded and ensuing provider behavior remain unknown."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
          "title": "recommends a dedicated channel for large services",
          "text": "Large in-scope services should provide a dedicated law-enforcement channel after their own crisis determination. Smaller high-risk protocol scope does not automatically carry this channel requirement."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "title": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
          "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "title": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
          "text": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The channel does not replace legal data-request processes. Existing appeals, accuracy, privacy and expression safeguards remain. A 90-day protocol/analysis clock is not a promise to restore removed posts or accounts.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/providerrecords",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "providerrecords",
        "title": "Who acts on a crisis—and who records it",
        "description": "Signals inform the provider, which determines activation and assembles its team. Large services have a specific police-channel recommendation. Providers retain analyses; Ofcom can seek them.",
        "boundary": "The channel does not replace legal data-request processes. Existing appeals, accuracy, privacy and expression safeguards remain. A 90-day protocol/analysis clock is not a promise to restore removed posts or accounts.",
        "topic": "Authority & records",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-indicators",
            "title": "External / internal signals",
            "sub": "Inputs; no automatic trigger",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-providers",
            "title": "In-scope providers",
            "sub": "Determine crisis using criteria",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-safeguards",
            "title": "Existing safeguards",
            "sub": "Appeals, expression and privacy",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-team",
            "title": "Provider crisis team",
            "sub": "Senior cross-functional responsibility",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-lechannel",
            "title": "Police crisis channel",
            "sub": "Large-service scope; existing law applies",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-analysis",
            "title": "Analysis and retained records",
            "sub": "Ofcom can ask; not all routinely public",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-inputs",
          "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
          "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
          "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
          "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords",
          "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
          "w31-fa-e-retainappeals",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
          "w31-fa-e-information",
          "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-codestatus",
      "number": "M09",
      "node": "ofcom",
      "title": "From published code to legal effect",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "The crisis statement was published in June and children-code amendments were laid. Their source record does not resolve final crisis commencement. September’s NCII announcement supplies a different measure’s date.",
      "claim": "The crisis statement was published in June and children-code amendments were laid. Their source record does not resolve final crisis commencement. September’s NCII announcement supplies a different measure’s date.",
      "why": "The draft’s analysis clock is not a restoration guarantee. September 30 belongs to the NCII measure, not crisis rules. StopNCII is a recommended option with alternatives; no sole-supplier purchase requirement is established. Public partnership terms are in the earlier access reader; this measure does not prove execution.",
      "edges": [
        "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
        "w31-fa-e-laidchild",
        "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime",
        "w31-fa-e-nciidate",
        "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend",
        "w31-fa-e-swgflexpertise",
        "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
        "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
        "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "title": "published crisis protocol recommendations",
          "text": "Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-laidchild",
          "title": "submitted crisis code amendments for parliamentary process",
          "text": "The draft was submitted12June and laid18June2026; HCWS124 confirms laying and conditional40-day scrutiny then21days after issue. Blanks/brackets are not completed issue or commencement, and40days is not necessarily calendar days."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime",
          "title": "sets analysis timing at crisis end or90days if earlier",
          "text": "DraftC11.7 expressly sets analysis/improvement timing. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-protocol-at90days sentence; neither guarantees restoration of removals."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-nciidate",
          "title": "announced a separate30September2026 NCII measure",
          "text": "September9 official news/enforcement sources identify30September for NCII hash-matching. That date is not imported into the crisis protocol or unrelated CMA verification proposals. No named service implementation established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend",
          "title": "recommended StopNCII as a suitable option",
          "text": "The NCII news recommends StopNCII while allowing equally effective alternatives; it does not require purchasing a sole supplier or establish terms of access."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-swgflexpertise",
          "title": "was described as providing expertise through a partnership",
          "text": "Ofcom's NCII news describes SWGfL expertise/partnership. Payment, selection, contracting and approval terms were not acquired; this is not authority over Ofcom's code decisions."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "title": "declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers",
          "text": "The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "title": "declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission",
          "text": "Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
          "title": "may seek records for supervision",
          "text": "Providers retain records and Ofcom may seek them or ask about activation; no universal routine public/submitted ledger was adopted. No particular suppressed record or request is established."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The draft’s analysis clock is not a restoration guarantee. September 30 belongs to the NCII measure, not crisis rules. StopNCII is a recommended option with alternatives; no sole-supplier purchase requirement is established. Public partnership terms are in the earlier access reader; this measure does not prove execution.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/codestatus",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "codestatus",
        "title": "From published code to legal effect",
        "description": "The crisis statement was published in June and children-code amendments were laid. Their source record does not resolve final crisis commencement. September’s NCII announcement supplies a different measure’s date.",
        "boundary": "The draft’s analysis clock is not a restoration guarantee. September 30 belongs to the NCII measure, not crisis rules. StopNCII is a recommended option with alternatives; no sole-supplier purchase requirement is established. Public partnership terms are in the earlier access reader; this measure does not prove execution.",
        "topic": "Authority & records",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-childdraft",
            "title": "Children-code draft",
            "sub": "Submitted 12 June; laid 18 June 2026",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-analysis",
            "title": "Analysis and retained records",
            "sub": "Ofcom can ask; not all routinely public",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-nciimeasure",
            "title": "Separate NCII measure",
            "sub": "30 September 2026 date; not crisis",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w28-access-stopncii",
            "title": "StopNCII",
            "sub": "Recommended option; alternatives allowed",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w28-access-swgfl",
            "title": "SWGfL",
            "sub": "Expertise; public terms separately retained",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-laidchild",
          "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime",
          "w31-fa-e-nciidate",
          "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend",
          "w31-fa-e-swgflexpertise",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-creative",
      "number": "M10",
      "node": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
      "title": "From evidence to police and advertiser decisions",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Operation Creative separates rightsholder referrals, police assessment and distribution to advertising recipients. Operators can challenge action; police removal has a stated evidential condition.",
      "claim": "Operation Creative separates rightsholder referrals, police assessment and distribution to advertising recipients. Operators can challenge action; police removal has a stated evidential condition.",
      "why": "The embedded police guidance is dated 2019, released in 2021. A request to disrupt services is not a court order. Removal from a list does not prove downstream advertising restoration.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-creative-evidence",
        "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
        "w30-class-e-creative-tactics",
        "w30-class-e-creative-notice",
        "w30-class-e-creative-challenge",
        "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
        "w30-class-e-prs-referrals",
        "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-creative-evidence",
          "title": "submit evidence for police assessment",
          "text": "Released guidance requires investigation quality, lawful evidence and a rightsholder/nominee statement sufficient to support prosecution; referral alone does not approve a listing."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
          "title": "assesses qualifying referrals before distribution",
          "text": "PIPCU checks the evidential standard before qualifying referrals are circulated for advertising action. No prior adjudication condition is specified in this case study; this is not a comprehensive powers opinion."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-creative-tactics",
          "title": "determines tactics case by case",
          "text": "The Head of Unit chooses tactics under this dated Creative procedure; no named current officeholder or imported Ashiko DCI rule is asserted."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-creative-notice",
          "title": "contacts operators before further disruption",
          "text": "Guidance describes contact and a legitimate-operation route, followed by another review when positive contact fails. Payment-provider withdrawal is a separate request."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-creative-challenge",
          "title": "may challenge police action",
          "text": "Guidance affords website operators a challenge route; this is not the FOI access-review deadline."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
          "title": "removes immediately upon evidence offences ceased",
          "text": "The dated procedure requires immediate removal on evidence that offences have ceased; no worked recipient-wide reversal or specific mistaken-original-entry test is established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-prs-referrals",
          "title": "reports138 website referrals",
          "text": "PRS's contribution reports138 referrals, not138 accepted listings. Its2018/19 report paragraph does not specify the counting period."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution",
          "title": "distributes IWL for advertising decisions",
          "text": "The dated report and industry guide describe list distribution and authenticated access; receipt is distinct from adopted contracts and actual advertising action."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The embedded police guidance is dated 2019, released in 2021. A request to disrupt services is not a court order. Removal from a list does not prove downstream advertising restoration.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/creative",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "creative",
        "title": "From evidence to police and advertiser decisions",
        "description": "Operation Creative separates rightsholder referrals, police assessment and distribution to advertising recipients. Operators can challenge action; police removal has a stated evidential condition.",
        "boundary": "The embedded police guidance is dated 2019, released in 2021. A request to disrupt services is not a court order. Removal from a list does not prove downstream advertising restoration.",
        "topic": "Advertising lists",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
            "title": "Rightsholder referrers",
            "sub": "Evidence enters police review",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-pipcu",
            "title": "PIPCU police unit",
            "sub": "Police assessment and list review",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwl",
            "title": "Infringing Website List",
            "sub": "Police list; not a universal ban",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
            "title": "Advertising recipients",
            "sub": "Apply their own terms and choices",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-site-operators",
            "title": "Website operators",
            "sub": "Notice and challenge role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-creative-head",
            "title": "Creative Head of Unit",
            "sub": "Chooses Creative tactics case by case",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-creative",
            "title": "Operation Creative",
            "sub": "Dated procedure; portal design separate",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-prs",
            "title": "PRS for Music",
            "sub": "138 referrals reported; period unspecified",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-creative-evidence",
          "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
          "w30-class-e-creative-tactics",
          "w30-class-e-creative-notice",
          "w30-class-e-creative-challenge",
          "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
          "w30-class-e-prs-referrals",
          "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-distribution",
      "number": "M11",
      "node": "w30-class-contributors",
      "title": "International sharing of advertising warnings",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "WIPO ALERT carries national assessments to approved advertising users. Contributors retain responsibilities and access choices; users choose which lists to use. Review begins in the relevant national process.",
      "claim": "WIPO ALERT carries national assessments to approved advertising users. Contributors retain responsibilities and access choices; users choose which lists to use. Review begins in the relevant national process.",
      "why": "PIPCU is cited as a precedent, not a proved operational feed. Cross-list deletion notification is not automatic worldwide removal or advertising restoration.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
        "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent",
          "title": "is cited as national precedent",
          "text": "WIPO2019 paragraph3 cites PIPCU's IWL as a precedent; this does not establish a UK contributor agreement or operational feed."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
          "title": "provides distribution infrastructure",
          "text": "WIPO distributes national lists and disclaims making its own infringement determinations."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
          "title": "supply national assessments and maintain entries",
          "text": "2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
          "title": "screens and approves advertising access",
          "text": "FAQ permits WIPO to assess genuine advertising-business eligibility before access. Approval for any named applicant is not shown."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
          "title": "may refuse particular users list access",
          "text": "FAQ describes contributor permission/refusal with all lists the default; this is a data-access right, not control of every advertising choice."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
          "title": "select which contributor lists to use",
          "text": "FAQ permits users to choose contributor/country lists and describes manual/API access. No runtime use tested."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
          "title": "limits described use to preventing misplaced ads",
          "text": "FAQ summarizes an advertising-only user agreement and confidentiality obligations; free access is described, with no executed current schedule or subsidy amount."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
          "title": "seek correction through applicable national process",
          "text": "2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
          "title": "describes cross-list deletion notification",
          "text": "FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use",
          "title": "reports membership and use alongside own assessments",
          "text": "White Bullet's5May2021 account names WIPO ALERT membership and combined official/private data offering; no executed licence or item-level ingestion audit."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "PIPCU is cited as a precedent, not a proved operational feed. Cross-list deletion notification is not automatic worldwide removal or advertising restoration.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/distribution",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "distribution",
        "title": "International sharing of advertising warnings",
        "description": "WIPO ALERT carries national assessments to approved advertising users. Contributors retain responsibilities and access choices; users choose which lists to use. Review begins in the relevant national process.",
        "boundary": "PIPCU is cited as a precedent, not a proved operational feed. Cross-list deletion notification is not automatic worldwide removal or advertising restoration.",
        "topic": "Advertising lists",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-contributors",
            "title": "National contributors",
            "sub": "National process and list control",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT",
            "sub": "Advertising distribution only",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-alert-users",
            "title": "Authorized advertising users",
            "sub": "Choose permitted lists",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-whitebullet",
            "title": "White Bullet",
            "sub": "Official lists and proprietary scoring",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-site-operators",
            "title": "Website operators",
            "sub": "Notice and challenge role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo",
            "title": "WIPO",
            "sub": "Administers access and distribution",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwl",
            "title": "Infringing Website List",
            "sub": "Police list; not a universal ban",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
          "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-commercial",
      "number": "M12",
      "node": "w30-class-gpi",
      "title": "Classifications, licences and business decisions",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "White Bullet describes an official-list index and a separate proprietary risk index. Peer39 markets an exclusion offering. Gambling Commission duties give a distinct contractual route for licensees.",
      "claim": "White Bullet describes an official-list index and a separate proprietary risk index. Peer39 markets an exclusion offering. Gambling Commission duties give a distinct contractual route for licensees.",
      "why": "Vendor descriptions and announcements do not prove a customer activated the service. LCCP contractual requirements are not a mandate to treat every IWL entry as a universal prohibition.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
        "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right",
        "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
        "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
        "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
        "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
        "w30-class-e-peer-offering"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
          "title": "publishes all-licence placement condition",
          "text": "Current inspected condition16.1.1 requires avoiding ads on copyright-infringing destinations and reasonable steps for relevant third parties."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right",
          "title": "requires termination-capable third-party contracts",
          "text": "Contracts must permit prompt termination where the licensee reasonably considers specified misplacement occurred, subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is capacity, not automatic exercise."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
          "title": "encourages licensee access",
          "text": "2017 announcement encourages IWL use alongside the separate licence condition. It does not make every IWL listing a universal legal prohibition."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
          "title": "advertises combined official-list resource",
          "text": "Vendor describes a global court/order-list index, distinct from its own broader risk scoring. No underlying entries were inspected."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
          "title": "advertises independent risk assessments",
          "text": "Vendor describes specialist/machine-learning assessment beyond adjudicated sites; this is a commercial methodology claim, not a court finding."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
          "title": "announces prospective marketplace delivery",
          "text": "26May2021 announcement says planned pre-bid offering will go live inQ3; it alone does not prove completion."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-peer-offering",
          "title": "currently advertises piracy exclusion offering",
          "text": "Current marketplace counterpart lists White Bullet as providing a piracy-domain exclusion resource. Exact launch, purchaser activation and cash effects are unverified."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Vendor descriptions and announcements do not prove a customer activated the service. LCCP contractual requirements are not a mandate to treat every IWL entry as a universal prohibition.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/commercial",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "commercial",
        "title": "Classifications, licences and business decisions",
        "description": "White Bullet describes an official-list index and a separate proprietary risk index. Peer39 markets an exclusion offering. Gambling Commission duties give a distinct contractual route for licensees.",
        "boundary": "Vendor descriptions and announcements do not prove a customer activated the service. LCCP contractual requirements are not a mandate to treat every IWL entry as a universal prohibition.",
        "topic": "Advertising lists",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gpi",
            "title": "Official-list index",
            "sub": "Official findings combined",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-whitebullet",
            "title": "White Bullet",
            "sub": "Official lists and proprietary scoring",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-ipi",
            "title": "Proprietary risk index",
            "sub": "Vendor assessment, not judgment",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-peer39",
            "title": "Peer39",
            "sub": "Markets exclusion; activation unverified",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
            "title": "Gambling Commission",
            "sub": "Licence duties; IWL guidance",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1 condition",
            "sub": "Contract terms and reasonable steps",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gambling-licensees",
            "title": "Gambling licensees",
            "sub": "Specified licence scope, not all advertisers",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwl",
            "title": "Infringing Website List",
            "sub": "Police list; not a universal ban",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
          "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right",
          "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
          "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
          "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
          "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
          "w30-class-e-peer-offering"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-matching",
      "number": "M13",
      "node": "mc-acquirers",
      "title": "How merchant records affect payment access",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Acquirers report qualifying terminations; authorized users must inquire. Mastercard permits admission of a listed merchant, while Stripe publishes a more restrictive practice with exceptions. Correction is a distinct route.",
      "claim": "Acquirers report qualifying terminations; authorized users must inquire. Mastercard permits admission of a listed merchant, while Stripe publishes a more restrictive practice with exceptions. Correction is a distinct route.",
      "why": "August 2026 public network rules are not backdated to earlier disputes. Inquiry, response, early removal and five-year purge have different clocks. No automatic admission or restoration is shown.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
        "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
        "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
        "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
        "w30-class-e-match-access",
        "w30-class-e-match-entry",
        "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
        "w30-class-e-match-admission",
        "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
        "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
        "w30-class-e-match-purge",
        "w30-class-e-match-correction",
        "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights",
        "w30-class-e-stripe-policy",
        "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
          "title": "requires investigation and reporting",
          "text": "Policy requires acquirer investigation/reporting within2businessdays for law-enforcement evidence or5 for qualifying private referrals, with discretionary extensions. WIPO is not classified as law enforcement here; clocks are not added to WIPO notice periods."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
          "title": "must end acceptance for affirmatively infringing products",
          "text": "An affirmative policy finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; negative findings require compelling evidence. Product cessation is not automatically full merchant termination."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
          "title": "must report applicable merchant termination",
          "text": "Anti-Piracy Policy conditionally requires MATCH notice if the acquirer terminates the merchant; no particular WIPO/Creative merchant report is established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
          "title": "retains policy interpretation and membership sanctions",
          "text": "Mastercard reserves interpretation/enforcement and possible membership restriction or sanctions for noncompliance. No exercised sanction in this packet."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-access",
          "title": "approve service-provider access within registration rules",
          "text": "Chapter11 requires relevant service-provider registration/provisioning and acquirer approval. No authorization was exercised by this inquiry."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-entry",
          "title": "must report under qualifying termination triggers",
          "text": "Section11.5 combines termination by merchant/acquirer with reason to believe a listed condition exists. Five calendar days runs from earlier listed decision/notice/awareness events, not effective termination; awareness is not detached from the opening condition."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
          "title": "must inquire before agreement or acceptance",
          "text": "Section11.6 requires inquiry before signing/enabling acceptance. Exact/phonetic or spelling hits are possible identity matches requiring relevance checks, not proof of misconduct."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-admission",
          "title": "may admit a listed merchant",
          "text": "Sections11.2/11.6.4 expressly allow onboarding notwithstanding a MATCH entry; mandatory inquiry does not require refusal. Each institution makes its own decision."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
          "title": "retain accuracy and reasonable-correction responsibility",
          "text": "Acquirers retain accuracy responsibility when delegating work; good faith, reason-code grounds and reasonable correction are required. Removal requests require a30calendar-day response, listing questions7; neither clock guarantees removal."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
          "title": "provides retroactive alerts after inquiries",
          "text": "Section11.6.4 describes alerts for later added information within365days after an inquiry, visible30days and once in batch results. Recipient next steps remain separate; no closure cascade observed."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-purge",
          "title": "provides five-year listing purge",
          "text": "Section11.10 provides5year listing retention/purge; recipient records persist at least2years after agreement end and inquiry records365days. Central purge does not erase all downstream records or restore processing."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-correction",
          "title": "permits early removal on specified grounds",
          "text": "Section11.13 permits removal for erroneous addition reported by an authorized user or specified cured PCI code12 noncompliance. Merchant direct application when acquirer unwilling/unable is narrow PCI route, not general bypass."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights",
          "title": "may seek applicable personal-information remedies",
          "text": "March2026 notice describes law-dependent access/correction/restriction/deletion/complaint routes, with California requests to relevant institutions and other requests possibly redirected. One-month written reply is not correction deadline; no universal processing entitlement."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-stripe-policy",
          "title": "publishes general disqualification with exceptions",
          "text": "Stripe generally disqualifies MATCH-listed merchants but will consider documented exceptional circumstances such as identity theft. Consideration does not promise approval."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect",
          "title": "is an input to restrictive underwriting",
          "text": "Stripe's published practice gives MATCH a restrictive onward use. No identified Stripe decision or acquiring-bank identity is established; its1workingday summary differs from the August network5calendar-day rule."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "August 2026 public network rules are not backdated to earlier disputes. Inquiry, response, early removal and five-year purge have different clocks. No automatic admission or restoration is shown.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/matching",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "matching",
        "title": "How merchant records affect payment access",
        "description": "Acquirers report qualifying terminations; authorized users must inquire. Mastercard permits admission of a listed merchant, while Stripe publishes a more restrictive practice with exceptions. Correction is a distinct route.",
        "boundary": "August 2026 public network rules are not backdated to earlier disputes. Inquiry, response, early removal and five-year purge have different clocks. No automatic admission or restoration is shown.",
        "topic": "Payment restrictions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "mc-acquirers",
            "title": "Mastercard acquirers",
            "sub": "Report, inquire, decide and correct",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-match",
            "title": "MATCH Pro",
            "sub": "Inquiry is mandatory; exclusion is not",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-match-users",
            "title": "Authorized MATCH users",
            "sub": "Access is approved; inquiry required",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
            "title": "Stripe acceptance practice",
            "sub": "General exclusion, with exceptions",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-merchants",
            "title": "Merchants & owners",
            "sub": "Applicable remedy routes",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "mastercard",
            "title": "Mastercard",
            "sub": "Network standards and limited remedies",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "stripe",
            "title": "Stripe",
            "sub": "Publishes a separate acceptance policy",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
          "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
          "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
          "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
          "w30-class-e-match-access",
          "w30-class-e-match-entry",
          "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
          "w30-class-e-match-admission",
          "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
          "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
          "w30-class-e-match-purge",
          "w30-class-e-match-correction",
          "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights",
          "w30-class-e-stripe-policy",
          "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-alertpay",
      "number": "M14",
      "node": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
      "title": "How notices reach payment companies",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "The proposed process carries authorized claims through WIPO formalities to payment providers. WIPO reports a manual pilot; its programme separately plans deployment.",
      "claim": "The proposed process carries authorized claims through WIPO formalities to payment providers. WIPO reports a manual pilot; its programme separately plans deployment.",
      "why": "Pilot: 17 actions, 35 sites; 71% went offline OR removed infringing goods. These are reported composite site outcomes, not account-closure counts. Named development partners are not proved to be the two unnamed pilot providers. ER2.3 is a broader budget, not a Pay allocation.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
        "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
        "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
        "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget",
        "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
          "title": "administers formalities, notices and review requests",
          "text": "Presentation assigns hosting, completeness/attestation checks, notices and review administration to WIPO; contested-merits decision rules and recipient restoration duties remain not obtained."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
          "title": "submit claims after first notice interval",
          "text": "Diagram describes a rightsholder notice and3workingdays before WIPO application, then WIPO completeness review/second notice and another3workingdays before PSP assessment. No completeness deadline or guaranteed six-day maximum is supplied; actual/simulated-purchase conditions are not treated as universal."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
          "title": "transmits claims for provider-specific decisions",
          "text": "Providers choose action, if any, under existing policies; WIPO does not order automatic merchant termination. Named development providers are not the anonymous pilot identities."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
          "title": "reports manual pilot and composite removals",
          "text": "Deck reports November2024–August2025 pilot, six rightsholders/two unnamed PSPs,17actions/35sites and71% sites offline OR goods removed. No closure numerator, permanent effect, causal attribution, lost revenue or independent evaluation established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
          "title": "includes planned deployment priority",
          "text": "Approved2026/27 programme names ALERT-PAY deployment. Broader result/sector sums are not allocated to this tool."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget",
          "title": "allocates broader result budget",
          "text": "Programme allocates CHF2.858m to ER2.3, not to ALERT-PAY alone; no private PSP finance or supplier payment is established. Financial details: value: 2,858,000; currency: CHF; kind: broader ER2.3 budget allocation; not Pay earmark; period: 2026/27"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend",
          "title": "reports broader pre-IPSAS expenditure",
          "text": "WIPO reports CHF3.207m pre-IPSAS actual expenditure for ER2.3 in2024/25. It is not a Pay project cost or bank transfer; broader sector totals are non-additive context. Financial details: value: 3,207,000; currency: CHF; kind: reported ER2.3 pre-IPSAS expenditure; not Pay cost; period: 2024/25"
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Pilot: 17 actions, 35 sites; 71% went offline OR removed infringing goods. These are reported composite site outcomes, not account-closure counts. Named development partners are not proved to be the two unnamed pilot providers. ER2.3 is a broader budget, not a Pay allocation.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/alertpay",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "alertpay",
        "title": "How notices reach payment companies",
        "description": "The proposed process carries authorized claims through WIPO formalities to payment providers. WIPO reports a manual pilot; its programme separately plans deployment.",
        "boundary": "Pilot: 17 actions, 35 sites; 71% went offline OR removed infringing goods. These are reported composite site outcomes, not account-closure counts. Named development partners are not proved to be the two unnamed pilot providers. ER2.3 is a broader budget, not a Pay allocation.",
        "topic": "Payment restrictions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
            "title": "Authorized rightsholders",
            "sub": "Claimants in the proposed workflow",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-pay",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "sub": "Design and pilot, separate from ALERT",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-payment-providers",
            "title": "Payment providers",
            "sub": "Own-policy decisions; pilot firms unnamed",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-pay-pilot",
            "title": "Manual pilot",
            "sub": "71% composite outcome, reported",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo",
            "title": "WIPO",
            "sub": "Administers access and distribution",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
            "title": "Approved 2026/27 programme",
            "sub": "Planned Pay deployment within broad work",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
            "title": "Broader ER2.3 budget",
            "sub": "Not an ALERT-PAY allocation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
          "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
          "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
          "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-courts",
      "number": "M15",
      "node": "w30-class-egumball",
      "title": "Court challenges and the limits of restoration",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "eGumball sought emergency delisting relief. The 2023 appeal reversed that provisional relief; the 2025 appeal rejected anti-SLAPP protection at its first step. FilmOn supplied an expressly applied legal framework.",
      "claim": "eGumball sought emergency delisting relief. The 2023 appeal reversed that provisional relief; the 2025 appeal rejected anti-SLAPP protection at its first step. FilmOn supplied an expressly applied legal framework.",
      "why": "The rulings do not establish merchant liability, actual delisting or new processing access. The May 2025 modifying order corrects an inverted sentence without changing judgment. Current MATCH rules are a separate source period.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
        "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
        "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
        "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
        "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
        "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
        "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
        "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief",
        "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
          "title": "reported eGumball after termination",
          "text": "The appellate record describes Merrick's termination and MATCH listing of eGumball; its record showed Merrick alone could request this listing's addition/removal. Accuracy and final remedy remain unresolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
          "title": "sought provisional delisting relief",
          "text": "Court record describes a merchant challenge seeking removal; damages and wrongdoing allegations are not adopted as findings."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
          "title": "ordered removal requests in provisional TRO",
          "text": "3November2021 TRO required Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal; its mandatory portion was stayed on appeal and later reversed. No performed delisting or processing restoration is proved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
          "title": "reversed emergency mandatory relief",
          "text": "17May2023 appeal reversed for insufficient showing of required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing, expressly reserving merits. Delisting alone would still need another acquirer's admission decision."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
          "title": "sought anti-SLAPP protection for MATCH report",
          "text": "Merrick appealed denial of its special motion to strike; the2025 decision addresses procedural protected activity, not final truth or contract defenses."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
          "title": "affirmed denial at protected-activity step",
          "text": "Court found this confidential commercial report did not contribute to public discussion under425.16(e)(4), while rejecting a categorical exclusion of all confidential commercial speech. Conversion was outside the motion; liability and privilege/contract defenses remain unadjudicated."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
          "title": "modified inverted sentence without changing judgment",
          "text": "6May order substitutes eGumball's assertion that processed2020/2021 transactions were directly connected to written contracts; the contrary unmodified sentence is superseded. Rehearing denied, no judgment change; the assertion is not an adjudicated fact."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief",
          "title": "ordered revised public redacted brief",
          "text": "Disposition ordered an updated public brief within10days concerning28specified documents while partly permitting sealing without prejudice. No actual revised filing, exhibit contents or resulting remedy acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball",
          "title": "supplied expressly applied legal framework",
          "text": "2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The rulings do not establish merchant liability, actual delisting or new processing access. The May 2025 modifying order corrects an inverted sentence without changing judgment. Current MATCH rules are a separate source period.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/courts",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "courts",
        "title": "Court challenges and the limits of restoration",
        "description": "eGumball sought emergency delisting relief. The 2023 appeal reversed that provisional relief; the 2025 appeal rejected anti-SLAPP protection at its first step. FilmOn supplied an expressly applied legal framework.",
        "boundary": "The rulings do not establish merchant liability, actual delisting or new processing access. The May 2025 modifying order corrects an inverted sentence without changing judgment. Current MATCH rules are a separate source period.",
        "topic": "Payment restrictions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball",
            "title": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "sub": "Challenges listing; restoration unproved",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
            "title": "Superior Court",
            "sub": "Provisional 2021 removal-request order",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-merrick",
            "title": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "sub": "Historical termination and listing role",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-match",
            "title": "MATCH Pro",
            "sub": "Inquiry is mandatory; exclusion is not",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
            "title": "Court of Appeal",
            "sub": "Separate 2023 and 2025 procedural rulings",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball2023",
            "title": "2023 TRO appeal",
            "sub": "Emergency relief reversed; merits open",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball2025",
            "title": "2025 anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "sub": "Procedural ruling; no restoration",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
            "title": "FilmOn precedent · 2019",
            "sub": "Legal precedent, not shared data",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
          "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief",
          "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-inquiry",
      "number": "M16",
      "node": "w30-class-adalytics",
      "title": "Political pressure and three different responses",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Adalytics research and CMA’s claimed advocacy precede the February 2025 requests to DV, MRC and TAG. TAG reports no investigated BSC violations; DV disputes interpretation and reports additional safeguards.",
      "claim": "Adalytics research and CMA’s claimed advocacy precede the February 2025 requests to DV, MRC and TAG. TAG reports no investigated BSC violations; DV disputes interpretation and reports additional safeguards.",
      "why": "The letters are requests, not subpoenas. CMA’s claimed contribution is not proof it drafted them. TAG’s determination is its own reported result, not independent exoneration; no MRC revocation is proved.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
        "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
        "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
        "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
        "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
        "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
        "w30-class-e-tag-determination",
        "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
          "title": "provided research described as available before release",
          "text": "Senate office announcement says senators received Adalytics research before public release. Underlying full technical report/methods were not inspected in this lane; no merits finding follows."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
          "title": "claims advocacy contribution",
          "text": "CMA says its advocacy helped the inquiry. Senate records independently establish requests but do not credit CMA with drafting; no sole-cause claim."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
          "title": "requests remediation, data-use and revenue answers",
          "text": "Letter asks about blocking/remediation, advertiser notification, annual NCMEC-report use, authority reports and related revenue; answers requested by14February. Questions are not proof of underlying violations or completed compliance."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
          "title": "requests review, audit and possible revocation explanations",
          "text": "Letter challenges MRC about certification, audits, fee policies and revocation. Its cited2018guidance was not freshly acquired; no accreditor breach or executed revocation inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
          "title": "questions certification and whole-website monetization",
          "text": "TAG letter asks whether certified firms may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity while avoiding prohibited content itself, alongside review/revocation questions. This proposed broader responsibility is not a proven adopted ban."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
          "title": "disputes interpretation and reports added safeguards",
          "text": "February7 company response disputes technical conclusions, reports extra blocking/review and a P2P category under development. It is interested-party response, not independently audited test data; temporal overlap with letters does not isolate causation."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-tag-determination",
          "title": "reports no investigated BSC guideline violations",
          "text": "TAG reports that none of investigated companies violated BSC guidelines, explains accreditation limits and cites a23-page response. This is TAG's own determination, not independent exoneration; named findings and reply remain not obtained."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april",
          "title": "publishes technical and commercial rebuttal",
          "text": "7April company statement challenges bot/billing/code and detection claims, including alleged misleading government representations. Merits and actual billable adjustments were not independently audited; this predates the14April letter."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The letters are requests, not subpoenas. CMA’s claimed contribution is not proof it drafted them. TAG’s determination is its own reported result, not independent exoneration; no MRC revocation is proved.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/inquiry",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "inquiry",
        "title": "Political pressure and three different responses",
        "description": "Adalytics research and CMA’s claimed advocacy precede the February 2025 requests to DV, MRC and TAG. TAG reports no investigated BSC violations; DV disputes interpretation and reports additional safeguards.",
        "boundary": "The letters are requests, not subpoenas. CMA’s claimed contribution is not proof it drafted them. TAG’s determination is its own reported result, not independent exoneration; no MRC revocation is proved.",
        "topic": "Standards pressure",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-adalytics",
            "title": "Adalytics",
            "sub": "Research source; later named defendant",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
            "title": "February 2025 inquiry",
            "sub": "Requests, not mandatory orders",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv",
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand",
            "sub": "Brand/product role; legal entities separate",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-tag",
            "title": "TAG",
            "sub": "Certification body; reports its review",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Claims advocacy; receives legal demand",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-mrc",
            "title": "Media Rating Council",
            "sub": "Audit and revocation questions received",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-tag-response",
            "title": "TAG reported finding",
            "sub": "No BSC violations, TAG reports",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
          "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
          "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
          "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
          "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
          "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
          "w30-class-e-tag-determination",
          "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-inputs",
      "number": "M17",
      "node": "w28-access-ncmec",
      "title": "How outside reports become vendor policy",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.",
      "claim": "DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.",
      "why": "Incoming reports differ from outbound notices; the exact files used by DV remain unknown. Neither a public-data source nor the over-£25,000 contribution band establishes approval rights. Planned integration and later reported implementation are distinct.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
        "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
        "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
        "w30-class-e-dv-adoption",
        "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
        "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
        "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation",
        "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
        "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
        "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
        "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial",
        "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
        "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
          "title": "announced future default enablement",
          "text": "13February2025 announcement says both categories will be enabled by default. P2P has acknowledged lawful uses; announced enablement is distinct from the later April reported state."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
          "title": "reported enabled default",
          "text": "24April2025 release states both categories are enabled by default. This is a company-reported operational state, not independently tested customer configuration."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
          "title": "was reported distributed to over100 partners",
          "text": "February release reports distribution to more than100 platform partners; this is not a count of activated recipients or blocked services."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-adoption",
          "title": "reported nearly30 category implementations",
          "text": "April24 release says nearly30 platforms implemented Highly Illicit and offers the category free to all platforms, including nonclients. No named platform logs, blocked-site count or raw-IWF-data redistribution licence proved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
          "title": "publishes reviewed-notice and response aggregates",
          "text": "Methodology describes staff visual review and tracked notifications, including repeated notices and possible upstream contacts.2023columns separate CSAM, non-CSAM exploitative images of identified victims and predatory text. Mixed response tables are not permanent whole-company labels or unique-incident counts."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
          "title": "is named as public-data origin by DV",
          "text": "DV identifies public NCMEC data as a starting point. This does not establish direct supply agreement, endorsement or equivalence to NCMEC's hash-sharing resource."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation",
          "title": "reports source selection and further assessment",
          "text": "DV says it reviewed three years/over300domains or providers, cross-checked existing classifications, assessed remaining sites and excluded large well-moderated social/search services. Exact years/files/columns/provider-domain mapping unknown; no misuse finding."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
          "title": "is described as an input to vendor category",
          "text": "DV's own account connects selected public material to its new Highly Illicit policy through additional judgment. The acquired2021–2023tables explain why units matter but are not proven to be the exact files used."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
          "title": "describes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removal",
          "text": "IWF says URLs are rechecked daily, removed the same day when relevant content is absent, with twice-daily list updates. This is upstream maintenance evidence, not observed DV reclassification or restored placements."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
          "title": "was announced as planned integration",
          "text": "April24 DV release and May8 IWF counterpart describe future incorporation of the URL List. They are partnership plans, not executed data terms or tested ingestion."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial",
          "title": "is described as integrated in DV testimonial",
          "text": "DV member testimonial in IWF's2025report section describes integration of IWF signals. No exact deployment date, delivery log or downstream correction chain is acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
          "title": "is listed as member since1April2025",
          "text": "IWF directory identifies the DV brand as member since1April2025, later than February categories. Exact legal signatory and agreement not established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band",
          "title": "is disclosed in contribution band overGBP25000",
          "text": "IWF places DV in Members contributing over£25,000. No exact amount, upper bound, payment date, invoice period or reconciled receipt is established; do not manufacture an annual2025payment by combining the current fee page. Payment status: band reported by recipient; receipt unverified"
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Incoming reports differ from outbound notices; the exact files used by DV remain unknown. Neither a public-data source nor the over-£25,000 contribution band establishes approval rights. Planned integration and later reported implementation are distinct.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/inputs",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "inputs",
        "title": "How outside reports become vendor policy",
        "description": "DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.",
        "boundary": "Incoming reports differ from outbound notices; the exact files used by DV remain unknown. Neither a public-data source nor the over-£25,000 contribution band establishes approval rights. Planned integration and later reported implementation are distinct.",
        "topic": "Standards pressure",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w28-access-ncmec",
            "title": "NCMEC",
            "sub": "Public aggregates, distinct meanings",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
            "title": "DV-selected public input",
            "sub": "Exact files and versions unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-hi-category",
            "title": "Highly Illicit category",
            "sub": "DV policy and additional judgment",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
            "title": "Platform partners",
            "sub": "Distribution ≠ activated implementation",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv",
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand",
            "sub": "Brand/product role; legal entities separate",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "iwf",
            "title": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "sub": "URL assessment and membership resources",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwf-url",
            "title": "IWF assessed URL List",
            "sub": "Specialist input, distinct from fees",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
            "title": "Outbound notice tables",
            "sub": "Not a domain guilt list",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
          "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
          "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
          "w30-class-e-dv-adoption",
          "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
          "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
          "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation",
          "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
          "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
          "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
          "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial",
          "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
          "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-returnpaths",
      "number": "M18",
      "node": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
      "title": "Preservation requests and legal counterpressure",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "DV Holdings’ counsel issued a preservation demand, and CMA publicly objected. The later complaint names both DV legal entities as plaintiffs and Adalytics as defendant; it separately alleges coordination with CMA.",
      "claim": "DV Holdings’ counsel issued a preservation demand, and CMA publicly objected. The later complaint names both DV legal entities as plaintiffs and Adalytics as defendant; it separately alleges coordination with CMA.",
      "why": "A preservation demand is not a court order or immediate production requirement. Objection is not proof of compliance or chilling. Requested damages and corrective advertising are not granted relief, and CMA is not the named defendant.",
      "edges": [
        "w30-class-e-bondi-representation",
        "w30-class-e-firm-representation",
        "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
        "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient",
        "w30-class-e-cma-objection",
        "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
        "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
        "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
        "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-bondi-representation",
          "title": "signed preservation letter as counsel",
          "text": "Recipient-published letter names Bondi acting for DoubleVerify Holdings on Paul Hastings letterhead. No fee or ownership relation follows."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-firm-representation",
          "title": "is named counsel in demand and pleading",
          "text": "Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
          "title": "issued counsel demand under anticipated litigation",
          "text": "Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient",
          "title": "requests preservation and confirmation",
          "text": "Addressed to Arielle Garcia care of CMA; asks confirmation by noonEDT16April. It demands neither immediate production, retraction nor cessation. Actual confirmation/compliance not acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-cma-objection",
          "title": "publicly objects while asserting legal compliance",
          "text": "16April statement says it will comply with legal obligations but views demand as overbroad and will continue work. This is a position, not completed preservation or judicial overbreadth finding; no measured chilling effect established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
          "title": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
          "text": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
          "title": "is named plaintiff in filed complaint",
          "text": "Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
          "title": "seeks damages, retraction and corrective advertising",
          "text": "Pleading asks compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs/fees and corrective relief. These are requested, not granted; CMA is not its named defendant."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation",
          "title": "alleges coordinated amplification",
          "text": "Paragraph68 alleges coordination with CMA in amplifying statements. This remains plaintiff allegation and does not establish a judicial finding, operational control or that CMA was sued in this complaint."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "A preservation demand is not a court order or immediate production requirement. Objection is not proof of compliance or chilling. Requested damages and corrective advertising are not granted relief, and CMA is not the named defendant.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/returnpaths",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "returnpaths",
        "title": "Preservation requests and legal counterpressure",
        "description": "DV Holdings’ counsel issued a preservation demand, and CMA publicly objected. The later complaint names both DV legal entities as plaintiffs and Adalytics as defendant; it separately alleges coordination with CMA.",
        "boundary": "A preservation demand is not a court order or immediate production requirement. Objection is not proof of compliance or chilling. Requested damages and corrective advertising are not granted relief, and CMA is not the named defendant.",
        "topic": "Standards pressure",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings",
            "sub": "Issuer and named plaintiff",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
            "title": "Preservation demand",
            "sub": "Request to CMA; not a court order",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Claims advocacy; receives legal demand",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-bondi",
            "title": "Bradley Bondi",
            "sub": "Signed counsel; no fee data acquired",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-inc",
            "title": "DoubleVerify Inc.",
            "sub": "Historical litigant and named plaintiff",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
            "title": "Filed complaint",
            "sub": "Adalytics is named defendant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-adalytics",
            "title": "Adalytics",
            "sub": "Research source; later named defendant",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-paul-hastings",
            "title": "Paul Hastings",
            "sub": "Firm named on demand and complaint",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-bondi-representation",
          "w30-class-e-firm-representation",
          "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
          "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient",
          "w30-class-e-cma-objection",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-research",
      "number": "M19",
      "node": "w29-enf-ipo",
      "title": "Who financed the policy research",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "All five disclosed co-funders connect to the same corrected March 2021 report. Publication, authored recommendations and MPA’s later parliamentary citation remain distinct routes.",
      "claim": "All five disclosed co-funders connect to the same corrected March 2021 report. Publication, authored recommendations and MPA’s later parliamentary citation remain distinct routes.",
      "why": "No grant amount, contract, editorial veto or donor instruction was acquired. The report says validation workshops excluded funders; that is a reported method. MPA quotes the executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation 4.",
      "edges": [
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
        "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
        "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
          "title": "published the co-funded research report",
          "text": "Corrected March2021 report names authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko. The authors claim findings were independent of funders;77interviews and two funder-excluding validation workshops are self-described methods. Funding, primary-data contribution and final editorial control are not interchangeable."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
          "title": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
          "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
          "title": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
          "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
          "title": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
          "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
          "title": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
          "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
          "title": "is disclosed as a co-funder",
          "text": "RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name. Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
          "title": "recommends verification and proportionate financial interventions",
          "text": "Recommendation4 seeks record/verification to extent possible and resources for compliance. Recommendation14 proposes that financial institutions seek existing lists and take appropriate actions including termination orSAR. Recommendation15 promotes reasonable identity best practice without waiting for formal KYBC. These are authored proposals, not established list entitlements or performed disruptions."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation",
          "title": "quotes the2021 report in parliamentary advocacy",
          "text": "Main§18 and footnote12 name and cite this report, quoting its executive-summary KYBC passage. That is a concrete co-funder→report→later-citation route. Quotation is from PDF12 executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation4; funding did not itself prove dictation or government adoption."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "No grant amount, contract, editorial veto or donor instruction was acquired. The report says validation workshops excluded funders; that is a reported method. MPA quotes the executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation 4.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/research",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "research",
        "title": "Who financed the policy research",
        "description": "All five disclosed co-funders connect to the same corrected March 2021 report. Publication, authored recommendations and MPA’s later parliamentary citation remain distinct routes.",
        "boundary": "No grant amount, contract, editorial veto or donor instruction was acquired. The report says validation workshops excluded funders; that is a reported method. MPA quotes the executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation 4.",
        "topic": "Earlier research",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-ipo",
            "title": "Intellectual Property Office",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-alliance",
            "title": "Alliance for IP",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w1-icmec-mpa",
            "title": "Motion Picture Association",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-industry-trust",
            "title": "Industry Trust",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-premier-league",
            "title": "Premier League",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              5,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-rusi",
            "title": "RUSI",
            "sub": "Publisher of corrected report",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
            "title": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime",
            "sub": "March 2021 corrected report",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
            "title": "Research recommendations",
            "sub": "Recommendations 4, 14 and 15",
            "pos": [
              5,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
            "title": "MPA parliamentary evidence",
            "sub": "Internal date · 10 May 2022",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
          "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-gdi-awards",
      "number": "M20",
      "node": "oak",
      "title": "Oak’s grants to GDI and rights organisations",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.",
      "claim": "Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.",
      "why": "Awards are not bank receipts or annual spending. The UK operator and German research participant remain separate roles; common branding does not establish corporate ownership.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi",
        "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty",
        "w32-gdi-e-oakorg",
        "w32-gdi-e-oakpi"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi",
          "title": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
          "text": "Oak2023 lists USD903614 over three years for core capacity to expand technological solutions addressing online disinformation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 903,614; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty",
          "title": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
          "text": "Oak2023 lists USD783133 over three years for core public/policymaker human-rights work. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 783,133; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-oakorg",
          "title": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
          "text": "Oak2023 lists USD437349 over three years for refugee/migrant-sector work concerning data sharing and immigration-control technologies. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 437,349; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-oakpi",
          "title": "reported a three-year 2023 grant",
          "text": "Oak2023 lists USD1138554 over three years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. It is not verified annual spending or cash received; no earmark to a later complaint, letter or named classifier decision is established. Financial details: value: 1,138,554; currency: USD; kind: reported three-year grant; period: three years; exact dates unknown Payment status: unverified Which legal entity: Report does not identify exact contracting Oak group entity or recipient registration identifier."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Awards are not bank receipts or annual spending. The UK operator and German research participant remain separate roles; common branding does not establish corporate ownership.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/gdi-awards",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "gdi-awards",
        "title": "Oak’s grants to GDI and rights organisations",
        "description": "Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.",
        "boundary": "Awards are not bank receipts or annual spending. The UK operator and German research participant remain separate roles; common branding does not establish corporate ownership.",
        "topic": "Grant resources & selection",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "oak",
            "title": "Oak Foundation",
            "sub": "Reported awards; cash unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "USD 903,614 · core capacity",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
            "title": "Liberty",
            "sub": "USD 783,133 · human-rights work",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-org",
            "title": "Open Rights Group",
            "sub": "USD 437,349 · migration / data",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-pi",
            "title": "Privacy International",
            "sub": "USD 1,138,554 · privacy safeguards",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi",
          "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty",
          "w32-gdi-e-oakorg",
          "w32-gdi-e-oakpi"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-peer-selection",
      "number": "M21",
      "node": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
      "title": "Who chooses Digital Freedom Fund projects",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "DFF describes staged 2025 selection rounds, March 2026 board adoption and peer selection of the June round. Staff and the published terms support that process.",
      "claim": "DFF describes staged 2025 selection rounds, March 2026 board adoption and peer selection of the June round. Staff and the published terms support that process.",
      "why": "These are attributed governance accounts. No original board resolution, complete recusal rules, named Liberty vote, grant signatory or payment is acquired. The March 2025 complaint predates the June 2026 grant.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption",
        "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
        "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
        "w32-gdi-e-terms",
        "w32-gdi-e-juneselection"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption",
          "title": "reportedly adopted the process in March 2026",
          "text": "Dated retrospective says the board ended the pilot by adopting the process in March2026. No original resolution or complete transfer/retention of legal contracting powers was inspected."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
          "title": "reportedly selected projects in two 2025 rounds",
          "text": "DFF retrospective reports ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects, then seventeen choosing thirteen projects across both types. These are reported selections, not inspected award contracts or evidence all2025 DFF decisions used peers."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
          "title": "provides review information and facilitation",
          "text": "Staff facilitate discussion and supply previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Published participant accounts describe judgment factors, not a binding scoring rubric or budget-setting authority."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-terms",
          "title": "is described as requiring confidentiality and conflict commitments",
          "text": "DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-juneselection",
          "title": "is credited with selecting the June 2026 grants",
          "text": "Previously accepted DFF announcement attributes the June round to the Peer Group. The staged-governance records clarify the process; they do not disclose a named Liberty vote, legal signatory or payment."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "These are attributed governance accounts. No original board resolution, complete recusal rules, named Liberty vote, grant signatory or payment is acquired. The March 2025 complaint predates the June 2026 grant.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/peer-selection",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "peer-selection",
        "title": "Who chooses Digital Freedom Fund projects",
        "description": "DFF describes staged 2025 selection rounds, March 2026 board adoption and peer selection of the June round. Staff and the published terms support that process.",
        "boundary": "These are attributed governance accounts. No original board resolution, complete recusal rules, named Liberty vote, grant signatory or payment is acquired. The March 2025 complaint predates the June 2026 grant.",
        "topic": "Grant resources & selection",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
            "title": "DFF board",
            "sub": "March 2026 process adoption",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
            "title": "DFF selection process",
            "sub": "Staged pilot; later adoption",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-peer",
            "title": "DFF Peer Group",
            "sub": "Reported project selection",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-dffstaff",
            "title": "DFF staff",
            "sub": "Information and facilitation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-peerterms",
            "title": "Peer Terms of Reference",
            "sub": "Conflict and confidentiality commitments",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dffround",
            "title": "June 2026 grant round",
            "sub": "Attributed peer selection; no payment proof",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption",
          "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
          "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
          "w32-gdi-e-terms",
          "w32-gdi-e-juneselection"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-public-funding",
      "number": "M22",
      "node": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
      "title": "GDI: public grants and EU research funding",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.",
      "claim": "FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.",
      "why": "The FCDO invoice is not an additional transfer above its aggregates. Programme totals are not recipient income; the German contribution is not a UK-company payment. No ownership or common-grant bridge is drawn.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
        "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
        "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
        "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
        "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
        "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
          "title": "reported providing funding between 2019 and 2022",
          "text": "Ministerial answer149420 reports GBP1999026 provided between2019 and2022 for activities outside the US. Donor-reported aggregate, not a reconciled ledger or contractual restriction on every later use of knowledge/data. Financial details: value: 1,999,026; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported provided funding; period: between2019 and2022; exact boundaries unknown Payment status: donor-reported provision; individual payments unreconciled Which legal entity: Answer uses GDI name without recipient company identifier."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
          "title": "reported further funding in the then-current financial year",
          "text": "Same answer reports a further GBP600797 in current financial year2022-2023. Do not add the separately displayed September2022 invoice row as an independent extra transfer. Financial details: value: 600,797; currency: GBP; kind: donor-reported further funding; period: FY2022-2023 context Payment status: donor-reported provision; recipient receipt not independently reconciled"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
          "title": "records a supplier invoice line with a 5 September 2022 GL date",
          "text": "Selected September2022 row records GBP130506, GL date5September2022, identifier300,000,130,671,861 line1, supplier GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX, Project Management category. GL date is not verified bank settlement, identifier not grant number, and row not allocated to either parliamentary total. Financial details: value: 130,506; currency: GBP; kind: published ledger/invoice-line amount; period: September2022 ledger; GL date5September Payment status: bank settlement unverified"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
          "title": "is named as a programme partner",
          "text": "Retrospectively published summary identifies FCDO and Cabinet Office as programme partners. No GDI-specific grant component is identified."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
          "title": "published the whole-project EU contribution",
          "text": "CORDIS records EUR5950682.50 project contribution and cost. This is an aggregate project field, not GDI income or a dated payout. The separately displayed German participant contribution is included within this project, not extra funding to add. Financial details: value: 5,950,682.5; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU project contribution; period: project1January2023-28February2026 Payment status: dated transfers unverified"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman",
          "title": "published a participant contribution of EUR 385275",
          "text": "CORDIS German GDI participant entry lists net EU contribution and total cost each EUR385275. The recipient is the German legal participant, not proven UK receipt, subaward or a bank transfer. Financial details: value: 385,275; currency: EUR; kind: published net EU participant contribution; period: AI4TRUST project interval; payout dates unknown Payment status: dated participant cash transfers unverified"
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The FCDO invoice is not an additional transfer above its aggregates. Programme totals are not recipient income; the German contribution is not a UK-company payment. No ownership or common-grant bridge is drawn.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/public-funding",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "public-funding",
        "title": "GDI: public grants and EU research funding",
        "description": "FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.",
        "boundary": "The FCDO invoice is not an additional transfer above its aggregates. Programme totals are not recipient income; the German contribution is not a UK-company payment. No ownership or common-grant bridge is drawn.",
        "topic": "Grant resources & selection",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
            "title": "FCDO",
            "sub": "Dated aggregate funding account",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
            "title": "CDMD programme",
            "sub": "Programme envelope ≠ recipient income",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "european-commission",
            "title": "European Commission",
            "sub": "Specified authority; no inferred case outcome",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
            "title": "AI4TRUST",
            "sub": "EU-funded research project",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdide",
            "title": "GDI gUG · Germany",
            "sub": "Named EU research participant",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
          "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
          "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
          "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
          "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
          "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-methodology",
      "number": "M23",
      "node": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "title": "From research terms to classification decisions",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "GDI contributed existing keyword resources; FBK edited D2.1 and recorded internal coordinator review. The document’s sampling and methodological choices are inspectable.",
      "claim": "GDI contributed existing keyword resources; FBK edited D2.1 and recorded internal coordinator review. The document’s sampling and methodological choices are inspectable.",
      "why": "Coordinator accepted / Ready for submission is an internal designation, not Commission acceptance. Keywords select material for research; they do not establish truth, illegality or deployed enforcement.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
        "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
        "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
        "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
        "w32-gdi-e-framing"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
          "title": "contributed pre-existing keyword resources to the design",
          "text": "D2.1 explicitly uses existing GDI lists among research, media and fact-checker contributions and some ChatGPT suggestions. No individual seed term is attributed exclusively to GDI, and the report does not establish which legal entity owned each background asset."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
          "title": "edited and recorded coordinator review before submission",
          "text": "D2.1 identifies FBK as editor and records final coordinator review on 1 November 2023. PDF2 positively designates PU: Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission in bold. These are internal document designations, not Commission acceptance."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
          "title": "is credited with the designated quality-manager review",
          "text": "Modification table version0.6 credits UCAM quality review27October2023. This is internal document review, not a public threshold approval policy or Commission acceptance."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
          "title": "defines a mixed-source collection perimeter",
          "text": "Selected initial topics and reusable relevance/feasibility criteria guide development/test collection. Neutral topics coexist with charged language; broad lists are refined. Inclusion is not a person/site falsehood finding, automatic sanction list or proven runtime configuration."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-framing",
          "title": "expressly adopts an intersectional methodological frame",
          "text": "PDF58-59 describes attention to harm, discrimination and social identity. The effect on annotation labels, thresholds or coverage remains a question for further records, not an observed exclusion result."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Coordinator accepted / Ready for submission is an internal designation, not Commission acceptance. Keywords select material for research; they do not establish truth, illegality or deployed enforcement.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/methodology",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "methodology",
        "title": "From research terms to classification decisions",
        "description": "GDI contributed existing keyword resources; FBK edited D2.1 and recorded internal coordinator review. The document’s sampling and methodological choices are inspectable.",
        "boundary": "Coordinator accepted / Ready for submission is an internal designation, not Commission acceptance. Keywords select material for research; they do not establish truth, illegality or deployed enforcement.",
        "topic": "Research inputs & evaluation",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-d21",
            "title": "D2.1 methodology",
            "sub": "Internal acceptance ≠ EC acceptance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-fbk",
            "title": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler",
            "sub": "Project coordinator / editor",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ucamreview",
            "title": "UCAM review role",
            "sub": "D2.1 quality assurance",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-seeds",
            "title": "Retrieval seeds",
            "sub": "Sampling inputs, not truth verdicts",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-framing",
            "title": "Methodological frame",
            "sub": "Explicitly adopted analytical approach",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
          "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
          "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
          "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
          "w32-gdi-e-framing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-component-results",
      "number": "M24",
      "node": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
      "title": "Test scores versus real-world results",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "AI4TRUST reports a final warning system, a textual component, a human-validation dashboard and user evaluation. Each finding belongs to its stated component and test.",
      "claim": "AI4TRUST reports a final warning system, a textual component, a human-validation dashboard and user evaluation. Each finding belongs to its stated component and test.",
      "why": "A textual weighted F1 near 56% is not aggregate system accuracy. Reported users and annotations do not establish production deployment, automatic sanctions or independent replication.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
        "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
        "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
        "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
          "title": "reports a six-tool calibrated ensemble for triage",
          "text": "Final-period report describes an ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration, combining six AI tools and providing triage categories/feature attribution. Exact inputs, weights, category thresholds and approval rules are not published in this read record."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
          "title": "reports a component-specific weighted F1 of about 56 percent",
          "text": "The metric applies to the textual signals tool detecting39signals across6tactics/8languages. It is not aggregate warning-system performance or probability a particular claim is false. No benchmark was reproduced."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
          "title": "reports an enhanced human-validation dashboard",
          "text": "Final report describes the named dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It supplies no override, score replacement, reasons, publisher appeal or correction-propagation rule."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation",
          "title": "reports three evaluation rounds involving 206 users",
          "text": "Population includes media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These reported rounds are not an independent Commission audit, actual downstream recipient list or measured advertising effect."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "A textual weighted F1 near 56% is not aggregate system accuracy. Reported users and annotations do not establish production deployment, automatic sanctions or independent replication.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/component-results",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "component-results",
        "title": "Test scores versus real-world results",
        "description": "AI4TRUST reports a final warning system, a textual component, a human-validation dashboard and user evaluation. Each finding belongs to its stated component and test.",
        "boundary": "A textual weighted F1 near 56% is not aggregate system accuracy. Reported users and annotations do not establish production deployment, automatic sanctions or independent replication.",
        "topic": "Research inputs & evaluation",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
            "title": "AI4TRUST",
            "sub": "EU-funded research project",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-warning",
            "title": "Warning system",
            "sub": "Reported final ensemble",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-textsignals",
            "title": "Textual component",
            "sub": "About 56% weighted F1; component only",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-validation",
            "title": "Human-validation dashboard",
            "sub": "Reported tool; not automatic action",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-evaluation",
            "title": "User evaluation",
            "sub": "206 users / three rounds reported",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
          "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
          "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
          "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-advertising-exits",
      "number": "M25",
      "node": "w32-gdi-gdi",
      "title": "GDI’s advertising relationships—and their endings",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "The historical Oracle segment and IAS input connect GDI ratings to buyer choices. Both named intermediaries later announced exits from the relevant service or input.",
      "claim": "The historical Oracle segment and IAS input connect GDI ratings to buyer choices. Both named intermediaries later announced exits from the relevant service or input.",
      "why": "Service announcements are not observed cache deletion or publisher restoration. Buyer configuration and actual revenue effects remain not obtained; these are historical channels, not proof of current use.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
        "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
        "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
        "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
        "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical",
        "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues",
        "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
          "title": "supplied ratings described in the Oracle product guide",
          "text": "Oracle2024 guide says GDI machine learning and expert human review provide high-risk news-website ratings packaged as gi_gdi_pfi. No executed licence, individual activation or GDI-specific default is shown."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
          "title": "offered the GDI contextual segment",
          "text": "Oracle packages the branded GDI input for targeting/avoidance. The separate Floor-tier default on PDF3 is not assigned to this different segment."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
          "title": "offered a selectable contextual input",
          "text": "Guide describes third-party segments for targeting or avoiding content. No specific advertiser configuration, bid rejection or revenue loss was acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
          "title": "announced an end to service and supporting access",
          "text": "Version3.0 FAQ includes Contextual Intelligence and integrations in30September2024 end-of-life, no new agreements/renewals and end of data-provider relationships. Informational policy, not runtime proof or current GDI delivery."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical",
          "title": "was identified as a limited historical input",
          "text": "IAS announcement acknowledges past limited GDI input in Context Control Avoidance. Exact fields, start date, customer settings and intermediary contract are not disclosed."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues",
          "title": "announced discontinuation of the limited GDI input",
          "text": "IAS says past GDI use will not affect this solution going forward. This is a product-change account, not observed cache deletion, individual publisher appeal success or independent neutrality finding."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices",
          "title": "allows category and risk-level exclusions",
          "text": "IAS describes customers selecting contextual exclusions. This product capability is separate from which customers selected GDI-derived inputs or changed choices after discontinuation."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Service announcements are not observed cache deletion or publisher restoration. Buyer configuration and actual revenue effects remain not obtained; these are historical channels, not proof of current use.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/advertising-exits",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "advertising-exits",
        "title": "GDI’s advertising relationships—and their endings",
        "description": "The historical Oracle segment and IAS input connect GDI ratings to buyer choices. Both named intermediaries later announced exits from the relevant service or input.",
        "boundary": "Service announcements are not observed cache deletion or publisher restoration. Buyer configuration and actual revenue effects remain not obtained; these are historical channels, not proof of current use.",
        "topic": "Distribution, exits & review",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-segment",
            "title": "Oracle GDI segment",
            "sub": "Selectable ratings input",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-oracle",
            "title": "Oracle",
            "sub": "Historical segment; service exit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
            "title": "IAS Context Control",
            "sub": "Customer category / risk choices",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-buyers",
            "title": "Advertising buyers",
            "sub": "Choose targeting / exclusions",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ias",
            "title": "Integral Ad Science",
            "sub": "Announced input discontinuation",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
          "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
          "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
          "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
          "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical",
          "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues",
          "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-review-routes",
      "number": "M26",
      "node": "w32-gdi-publishers",
      "title": "How an advertising classification can be challenged",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "GDI describes publisher rating appeals and reassessment. Its UK operator’s policy separately offers qualified consideration of concerns about research outputs.",
      "claim": "GDI describes publisher rating appeals and reassessment. Its UK operator’s policy separately offers qualified consideration of concerns about research outputs.",
      "why": "Neither process supplies an recipient-correction instruction, successful appeal or duty for buyers to resume advertising. Privacy deletion is not the same as withdrawing a rating.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding",
        "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision",
        "w32-gdi-e-researchreview",
        "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding",
          "title": "can appeal ratings in the described process",
          "text": "GDI tells Parliament publishers can appeal through a linked form. It reports two-to-three-week review and regular reassessment, not a tested guarantee or presently verified form."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision",
          "title": "described review and changeable ratings",
          "text": "GDI describes reassessment and ratings changing as content changes. No independent appeal tier, successful appeal, deletion/update protocol or obligation for a licensee to resume advertising is supplied."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-researchreview",
          "title": "offers qualified review of research-output representations",
          "text": "April2026 policy15/19.3 promises consideration and appropriate review/clarification/update, with a post-publication route where no advance notice. It does not guarantee substantive reversal or numerical complaint deadline."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits",
          "title": "provides a representation route without automatic restoration",
          "text": "Research-output concerns may be raised, but policy1 excludes separately contracted service processing. Personal-data deletion/data-subject rights are not a promise to delete a rating, update all recipients or reverse advertising choices."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Neither process supplies an recipient-correction instruction, successful appeal or duty for buyers to resume advertising. Privacy deletion is not the same as withdrawing a rating.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/review-routes",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "review-routes",
        "title": "How an advertising classification can be challenged",
        "description": "GDI describes publisher rating appeals and reassessment. Its UK operator’s policy separately offers qualified consideration of concerns about research outputs.",
        "boundary": "Neither process supplies an recipient-correction instruction, successful appeal or duty for buyers to resume advertising. Privacy deletion is not the same as withdrawing a rating.",
        "topic": "Distribution, exits & review",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-publishers",
            "title": "Affected publishers",
            "sub": "Described appeal standing",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
            "title": "GDI rating review",
            "sub": "Described reassessment; outcome unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
            "title": "Disinformation Index Ltd",
            "sub": "UK website operator / controller",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
            "title": "Research representations",
            "sub": "Qualified review, not restoration",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding",
          "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision",
          "w32-gdi-e-researchreview",
          "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-procedural-return",
      "number": "M27",
      "node": "w31-fa-liberty",
      "title": "Apple, Liberty and a partly private court case",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Liberty and Privacy International filed a separate complaint and submitted arguments. The tribunal denied concealment of basic Apple case details while keeping the March hearing private.",
      "claim": "Liberty and Privacy International filed a separate complaint and submitted arguments. The tribunal denied concealment of basic Apple case details while keeping the March hearing private.",
      "why": "This is a procedural decision, not a TCN merits ruling, a universal open-hearing right or an advertising remedy. The later identified DFF grant cannot be assumed to have initiated the earlier filing.",
      "edges": [
        "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
        "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
        "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
        "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
          "title": "filed the separate complaint",
          "text": "Liberty says filing occurred13March2025; tribunal paragraph33 independently acknowledges filing the day before its14March hearing. This precedes the identified June2026 DFF grant, without establishing earlier funding or reimbursement."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
          "title": "co-filed the separate complaint",
          "text": "Recipient account names PI and two individuals; the tribunal acknowledges the organisations and individuals filed a separate complaint. No individual biographies or original pleading are imported."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
          "title": "dismissed the confidentiality application",
          "text": "The tribunal refused concealment of basic case details. This procedural outcome is not a merits ruling against encryption-access powers or blanket public access to future proceedings."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing",
          "title": "kept the March hearing private",
          "text": "The court considered third-party written arguments but did not permit the organisations to attend this hearing. That limitation coexists with disclosure of basic case information."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "This is a procedural decision, not a TCN merits ruling, a universal open-hearing right or an advertising remedy. The later identified DFF grant cannot be assumed to have initiated the earlier filing.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/procedural-return",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "procedural-return",
        "title": "Apple, Liberty and a partly private court case",
        "description": "Liberty and Privacy International filed a separate complaint and submitted arguments. The tribunal denied concealment of basic Apple case details while keeping the March hearing private.",
        "boundary": "This is a procedural decision, not a TCN merits ruling, a universal open-hearing right or an advertising remedy. The later identified DFF grant cannot be assumed to have initiated the earlier filing.",
        "topic": "Distribution, exits & review",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
            "title": "Liberty",
            "sub": "Core award; separate procedural action",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-complaint",
            "title": "Liberty / PI complaint",
            "sub": "Filed 13 March 2025",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-pi",
            "title": "Privacy International",
            "sub": "Privacy and surveillance safeguards",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ipt",
            "title": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "sub": "Decides procedural applications",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
            "title": "Basic case details",
            "sub": "Application to withhold",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-hearing",
            "title": "March hearing",
            "sub": "Remained private",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
          "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
          "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
          "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-access-gates",
      "number": "M28",
      "node": "w33-con-homedsc",
      "title": "Who can access platform data",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "The provider-establishment DSC decides project vetting and request conditions. The researcher supplies eligibility and funding information; providers have a bounded amendment route.",
      "claim": "The provider-establishment DSC decides project vetting and request conditions. The researcher supplies eligibility and funding information; providers have a bounded amendment route.",
      "why": "This selected Article 40(4) path is separate from public-data access under 40(12) and notice priority under Article 22. An 80-working-day request/refusal clock is not a delivery promise. No GDI application is matched here.",
      "edges": [
        "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
        "w33-con-e-vetting",
        "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
        "w33-con-e-modalities",
        "w33-con-e-provide",
        "w33-con-e-amend"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
          "title": "forwards application and initial assessment",
          "text": "Home DSC assesses first; final decision expressly remains with establishment DSC."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-vetting",
          "title": "grants project-specific vetted status when conditions are met",
          "text": "Article40(8) specifies final eligibility decision; funding or Horizon participation does not itself confer status."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
          "title": "must demonstrate eligibility and disclose project funding",
          "text": "OperativeArticle8 requires project funding information and relevant commercial-independence declaration. Recital12 describes identity, amount, duration/nature, awarded/pending status and available funder evaluations. No actual declaration read."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-modalities",
          "title": "sets technical legal and organisational access conditions",
          "text": "Case-specific security, confidentiality, contracts and optional secure environments constrain access; raw-data transmission and nominated-tool integration are not automatic."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-provide",
          "title": "must provide access under a reasoned request",
          "text": "Data and appropriate interface follow the request within its reasonable period. Standard-tool/data-management restrictions that hinder research require explicit request provision; no additional personal-data conditions outside request."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-amend",
          "title": "may request amendment on specified access or security grounds",
          "text": "Provider has15days after receipt and must propose alternatives; DSC decides within15days. Additional information does not displace that decision deadline."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "This selected Article 40(4) path is separate from public-data access under 40(12) and notice priority under Article 22. An 80-working-day request/refusal clock is not a delivery promise. No GDI application is matched here.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/access-gates",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "access-gates",
        "title": "Who can access platform data",
        "description": "The provider-establishment DSC decides project vetting and request conditions. The researcher supplies eligibility and funding information; providers have a bounded amendment route.",
        "boundary": "This selected Article 40(4) path is separate from public-data access under 40(12) and notice priority under Article 22. An 80-working-day request/refusal clock is not a delivery promise. No GDI application is matched here.",
        "topic": "Researcher access decisions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w33-con-homedsc",
            "title": "Researcher-home DSC",
            "sub": "Initial assessment; not final decision",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-estdsc",
            "title": "Provider-establishment DSC",
            "sub": "Final project vetting / request",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-request",
            "title": "Reasoned access request",
            "sub": "Scope, conditions and time period",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-vetted",
            "title": "Vetted researchers",
            "sub": "Project-specific eligibility",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-providers",
            "title": "VLOP / VLOSE providers",
            "sub": "Article 40 data-provider role",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
          "w33-con-e-vetting",
          "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
          "w33-con-e-modalities",
          "w33-con-e-provide",
          "w33-con-e-amend"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-ali-oversight",
      "number": "M29",
      "node": "european-commission",
      "title": "Who pays and who supervises AliExpress’s trustee",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "AliExpress must fund the trustee; the Commission approved Ankura and controls its mandate. QA and monitoring reports should travel back through specified channels.",
      "claim": "AliExpress must fund the trustee; the Commission approved Ankura and controls its mandate. QA and monitoring reports should travel back through specified channels.",
      "why": "Appointment is acquired; mandate, fee payments and actual monitoring reports are not. The trustee may recommend and report, but cannot make product, business or technical decisions. These commitments concern Article 40(12).",
      "edges": [
        "w33-con-e-approveankura",
        "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
        "w33-con-e-mandate",
        "w33-con-e-monitor",
        "w33-con-e-qareport",
        "w33-con-e-trustreport"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-approveankura",
          "title": "approved the named monitoring trustee",
          "text": "Official notice records23September2025approval; no report delivery, performance approval or fee payment established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
          "title": "must fund the approved trustee on noncontingent terms",
          "text": "Provider proposes candidate/mandate and pays fees independent of results. No executed fee schedule, amount, invoice or payment acquired. Commission approval remains separate. Payment status: Obligation; actual paid amount unknown"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-mandate",
          "title": "approves mandate and may instruct or replace the trustee",
          "text": "Commission may reject/modify mandate and issue compliance instructions; replacement/discharge/hand-over governedC.7–8. No exercised instruction/replacement acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-monitor",
          "title": "must monitor and report without business decision powers",
          "text": "Trustee may recommend measures and promptly report reasonably concluded failure; cannot make product/business/technical decisions or exercise Commission investigative powers. Change notice is not prior approval; experimental changes excepted."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-qareport",
          "title": "must send semiannual access counts tests and feedback",
          "text": "Received/processed/approved/rejected metrics and feedback required; no actual report acquired. Recital174 ongoingQA expectation and AnnexD broader lapse wording remain unresolved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-trustreport",
          "title": "must submit monitoring reports and promptly flag concluded failure",
          "text": "First cycle ends30September2025, first report due within2months; later cycles endSeptember2026/2027. Company copy may remove third-party confidential material. No actual receipt/report/response acquired."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Appointment is acquired; mandate, fee payments and actual monitoring reports are not. The trustee may recommend and report, but cannot make product, business or technical decisions. These commitments concern Article 40(12).",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/ali-oversight",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "ali-oversight",
        "title": "Who pays and who supervises AliExpress’s trustee",
        "description": "AliExpress must fund the trustee; the Commission approved Ankura and controls its mandate. QA and monitoring reports should travel back through specified channels.",
        "boundary": "Appointment is acquired; mandate, fee payments and actual monitoring reports are not. The trustee may recommend and report, but cannot make product, business or technical decisions. These commitments concern Article 40(12).",
        "topic": "Researcher access decisions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "european-commission",
            "title": "European Commission",
            "sub": "Specified authority; no inferred case outcome",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-ankura",
            "title": "Ankura Europe",
            "sub": "Approved trustee; no business veto",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-ali",
            "title": "AliExpress",
            "sub": "Examined service; duties ≠ performance",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-qa",
            "title": "AliExpress access QA",
            "sub": "Tests / semiannual metrics required",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-approveankura",
          "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
          "w33-con-e-mandate",
          "w33-con-e-monitor",
          "w33-con-e-qareport",
          "w33-con-e-trustreport"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-audit-and-tracker",
      "number": "M30",
      "node": "w33-con-fti",
      "title": "A positive audit and no approved requests",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "FTI’s 2024/25 audit concluded positively on readiness, reported zero approvals and found the inspected applications incomplete or invalid. A later voluntary tracker provides a separate, unmatched account.",
      "claim": "FTI’s 2024/25 audit concluded positively on readiness, reported zero approvals and found the inspected applications incomplete or invalid. A later voluntary tracker provides a separate, unmatched account.",
      "why": "The two groups are not linked by identity or time. Tracker 70-headline / 68-table and 61-homepage / 60-table public counts remain unresolved. Complete registration is not legal validity; accepted is not delivered.",
      "edges": [
        "w33-con-e-ftiopinion",
        "w33-con-e-noapprovals",
        "w33-con-e-runs",
        "w33-con-e-alientry"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-ftiopinion",
          "title": "issued a positive40(12) readiness conclusion",
          "text": "Auditor concludes intention/capability and no recommendation, supported by documents/attestations/interviews and substantive electronic-process tests. No fresh replication/workpaper audit."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-noapprovals",
          "title": "reports zero approvals and all inspected applications incomplete or invalid",
          "text": "Request count redacted. FTI expressly says it inspected all applications against submitted information, not merely zero approvals. Public record establishes neither wrongful refusals nor delivered access."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-runs",
          "title": "collects voluntary application reports and publishes summaries",
          "text": "Self-reporting/support mission, no complete population frame or public original-decision set. Tracker updated8September2026."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-alientry",
          "title": "lists one AliExpress public-data entry as open",
          "text": "No submission date, identity, original exchange or exactArticle40paragraph. It cannot be matched to GDI or confidential audit applications."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "The two groups are not linked by identity or time. Tracker 70-headline / 68-table and 61-homepage / 60-table public counts remain unresolved. Complete registration is not legal validity; accepted is not delivered.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/audit-and-tracker",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "audit-and-tracker",
        "title": "A positive audit and no approved requests",
        "description": "FTI’s 2024/25 audit concluded positively on readiness, reported zero approvals and found the inspected applications incomplete or invalid. A later voluntary tracker provides a separate, unmatched account.",
        "boundary": "The two groups are not linked by identity or time. Tracker 70-headline / 68-table and 61-homepage / 60-table public counts remain unresolved. Complete registration is not legal validity; accepted is not delivered.",
        "topic": "Researcher access decisions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w33-con-fti",
            "title": "FTI Consulting LLP",
            "sub": "Named 2024/25 auditor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
            "title": "FTI audit opinion",
            "sub": "Positive readiness; not delivery",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-appcohort",
            "title": "2024/25 applications",
            "sub": "Zero approvals; count redacted",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-collab",
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory",
            "sub": "Application support / voluntary reports",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-tracker",
            "title": "Application tracker",
            "sub": "70 headline / 68 table; not census",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-aliopen",
            "title": "One AliExpress entry",
            "sub": "Open; identity and date unknown",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-ftiopinion",
          "w33-con-e-noapprovals",
          "w33-con-e-runs",
          "w33-con-e-alientry"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-evaluation-gate",
      "number": "M31",
      "node": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "title": "Who commissioned the £656,000 evaluation",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "The released CDDP material identifies Oliver Wyman and a £656,000 ex-VAT price. Payment depends on satisfactory deliverables; a later phase has an intended Treasury approval gate.",
      "claim": "The released CDDP material identifies Oliver Wyman and a £656,000 ex-VAT price. Payment depends on satisfactory deliverables; a later phase has an intended Treasury approval gate.",
      "why": "Price is not payment. Actual reports, acceptance certificate, paid invoice and exercised Treasury decision are not obtained. The released schedule has date inconsistencies and empty signature fields.",
      "edges": [
        "w33-con-e-owcommission",
        "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
        "w33-con-e-evalscope",
        "w33-con-e-gatecondition",
        "w33-con-e-treasurygate"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-owcommission",
          "title": "is identified as commissioning evaluation through102384",
          "text": "Department inventory identifiesOliverWyman; order supplier fields redacted. VisiblePhaseI108400+PhaseII547600=656000GBPexVAT; tenderprice/firstyearliabilitybasis, not paid funds. Released copy does not establish signatures/execution. Financial details: value: 656,000; currency: GBP; kind: disclosed fixed tender/contract price excluding VAT; not payment; period: 102384 phasesI/II Payment status: No payment record acquired"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
          "title": "conditions payment in arrears on satisfactory deliverables",
          "text": "Released payment/acceptance terms locate buyer review; no accepted deliverable, invoice approval or payment acquired. Date mismatch and empty signaturefields preserved."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-evalscope",
          "title": "commissions process impact correctness and value-for-money evaluation",
          "text": "Specification includes effectiveness of correctly identifying trends, successes/failures and final report for seniorcivilservants. A/B or experimental approaches conditional, not proof of execution."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-gatecondition",
          "title": "makes later-phase funding conditional on feasibility assessment",
          "text": "Provisional schedule names feasibility report and phase decisions; apparent year inconsistencies retained. Actual subsequent funding decision not acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-treasurygate",
          "title": "is assigned approval of subsequent-phase funding",
          "text": "Intended HMT officials approval/reporting route, not an exercised veto or identified official decision."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Price is not payment. Actual reports, acceptance certificate, paid invoice and exercised Treasury decision are not obtained. The released schedule has date inconsistencies and empty signature fields.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/evaluation-gate",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "evaluation-gate",
        "title": "Who commissioned the £656,000 evaluation",
        "description": "The released CDDP material identifies Oliver Wyman and a £656,000 ex-VAT price. Payment depends on satisfactory deliverables; a later phase has an intended Treasury approval gate.",
        "boundary": "Price is not payment. Actual reports, acceptance certificate, paid invoice and exercised Treasury decision are not obtained. The released schedule has date inconsistencies and empty signature fields.",
        "topic": "Assurance versus results",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w16-supp-dcms",
            "title": "DCMS",
            "sub": "Buyer / programme role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-oliver",
            "title": "Oliver Wyman",
            "sub": "Inventory-identified evaluator",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-evalcontract",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation 102384",
            "sub": "£656,000 ex VAT price; not payment",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-evaloutput",
            "title": "Evaluation / acceptance",
            "sub": "Commissioned; outputs not obtained",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-fundgate",
            "title": "Phase continuation",
            "sub": "Approval specified; decision unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-treasury",
            "title": "HM Treasury",
            "sub": "Intended later-phase funding gate",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-owcommission",
          "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
          "w33-con-e-evalscope",
          "w33-con-e-gatecondition",
          "w33-con-e-treasurygate"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-osdi-assurance",
      "number": "M32",
      "node": "w16-supp-dcms",
      "title": "From safety prototypes to reused evaluation methods",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "DCMS appointed PA for OSDI assurance. PUBLIC reports prototype testing and later credits OSDI practices in a separate STCF evaluation. A dated expert group supplied advice.",
      "claim": "DCMS appointed PA for OSDI assurance. PUBLIC reports prototype testing and later credits OSDI practices in a separate STCF evaluation. A dated expert group supplied advice.",
      "why": "PA’s report is not acquired. PUBLIC’s TRL4/testing account is not production acceptance, nor proof it was the redacted CDDP subcontractor. Poppy Wood’s advisory role is not procurement veto power.",
      "edges": [
        "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
        "w33-con-e-jointscope",
        "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
        "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
        "w33-con-e-methodreuse",
        "w33-con-e-advises",
        "w33-con-e-woodgroup"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
          "title": "appointed PA as external OSDI evaluator",
          "text": "23September2021deliverylead account describes assurance of process/resources/spending/quality andseniorcivilservantreporting. No originalscopeagreement/finalassessment acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-jointscope",
          "title": "had responsibilities and priorities agreed with government and consortium",
          "text": "Governmentaccount saysDCMS agreedwithPA incollaborationwithFaculty/PUBLIC. This is described processagreement, not unilateral supplierapproval or acquiredcontract."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
          "title": "is named in the delivery consortium",
          "text": "Same official OSDIconsortium; scope andsupplieridentity notproofPUBLICheldredactedCDDPsubcontract."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
          "title": "reports delivering a TRL4 prototype for DCMS review and testing",
          "text": "Commercialcase study claimsdataset/framework/DPIA/3pilotfirms/userguidance; finalstageproposesliveoperation. No originalframework,pilotresults or acceptancecertificate acquired."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-methodreuse",
          "title": "is expressly credited as a source of evaluation practices",
          "text": "PUBLICcreditsOSDIalongsideotherinputs; criteria includeperformance,robustness,scalability,privacy/security,userfeedback. OriginalOSDIframework notlinked, footnote17homepageonly."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-advises",
          "title": "advises scope direction and legally robust data stewardship",
          "text": "Government says group had encouraged userexperience emphasis; actualminutes,whichadvice accepted and approvalinstrument not obtained."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w33-con-e-woodgroup",
          "title": "was listed as Reset Tech Senior Advisor in the group",
          "text": "July2021professionalrole is a concreteadvisoryroute; laterResetUKdirectorship separate. No currentemployment,procurementvote,datacontrol or deploymentveto inferred."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "PA’s report is not acquired. PUBLIC’s TRL4/testing account is not production acceptance, nor proof it was the redacted CDDP subcontractor. Poppy Wood’s advisory role is not procurement veto power.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/osdi-assurance",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "osdi-assurance",
        "title": "From safety prototypes to reused evaluation methods",
        "description": "DCMS appointed PA for OSDI assurance. PUBLIC reports prototype testing and later credits OSDI practices in a separate STCF evaluation. A dated expert group supplied advice.",
        "boundary": "PA’s report is not acquired. PUBLIC’s TRL4/testing account is not production acceptance, nor proof it was the redacted CDDP subcontractor. Poppy Wood’s advisory role is not procurement veto power.",
        "topic": "Assurance versus results",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w16-supp-dcms",
            "title": "DCMS",
            "sub": "Buyer / programme role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "pa-consulting",
            "title": "PA Consulting",
            "sub": "External programme assurance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-osdi",
            "title": "OSDI",
            "sub": "Separate online-safety data initiative",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-public",
            "title": "PUBLIC",
            "sub": "Supplier / programme brand",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-sandbox",
            "title": "PUBLIC sandbox",
            "sub": "Reported TRL4 prototype / testing",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-stcf",
            "title": "STCF Round 2",
            "sub": "Separate 2024 evaluation",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-expertgroup",
            "title": "OSDI expert group",
            "sub": "Dated advice; no procurement veto",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w12-gov-wood",
            "title": "Poppy Wood",
            "sub": "July 2021 Reset Tech advisory role",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
          "w33-con-e-jointscope",
          "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
          "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
          "w33-con-e-methodreuse",
          "w33-con-e-advises",
          "w33-con-e-woodgroup"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-overview-risk",
      "number": "M33",
      "node": "fli",
      "title": "AI foundations & creators",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "claim": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "why": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "edges": [
        "e42",
        "e43",
        "e44",
        "e45",
        "e48",
        "e49",
        "e54",
        "e55",
        "e65",
        "e76",
        "e117",
        "e63a",
        "e63b",
        "e63c",
        "e63d",
        "w2-fli-e-lightcone25"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e42",
          "title": "2021 support; total not established",
          "text": "Primary FLI announcement confirms Buterin/SHIB support. $25m was a grant-program envelope, not the total donation. FLI describes the gift as unconditional and says no decision role."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e43",
          "title": "Reported disagreement over later strategy",
          "text": "March 2026 reporting carries Buterin's criticism of later cultural/political advocacy and FLI's reply. Primary X post inaccessible in the original investigation; no liquidation ledger verified."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e44",
          "title": "$162.59m asset transfer",
          "text": "$162,587,667 cash/public-securities fair value, related-entity transfer. Not campaign spending."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e45",
          "title": "$21.05m noncash contribution",
          "text": "Related-entity contribution of noncash investments in 2024; not new independent external fundraising."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e48",
          "title": "Board / officer service",
          "text": "Overlapping board or officer service in 2024 filing. Current role labels are in the node note."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e49",
          "title": "Board / officer service",
          "text": "2024 IRS-derived Lightcone officer record; full Lightcone schedules not obtained."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e54",
          "title": "Board member",
          "text": "Official biography read September 5, 2026; no campaign-specific orders inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e55",
          "title": "Board member",
          "text": "FLI official biography supplies CAIS governance bridge."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e65",
          "title": "$22,000 recommended grant",
          "text": "2023 general-support recommendation/allocation disclosure; not bank-level receipt proof."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e76",
          "title": "was announced as a placement host by",
          "text": "CAIS participating organization in announced September 7–November 15 cohort; prospective as of original September 5 cutoff."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e117",
          "title": "Support disclosed; amount/date unspecified",
          "text": "Talos disclosure says funders do not select fellows, develop content or direct strategy. No onward ControlAI transfer established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e63a",
          "title": "$5,160,000 · Historical grant award",
          "text": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Financial details: value: 5,160,000; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2022-11 Amount basis: indexed award"
        },
        {
          "edge": "e63b",
          "title": "$1,433,000 · Historical grant award",
          "text": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Financial details: value: 1,433,000; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2023-02 Amount basis: indexed award"
        },
        {
          "edge": "e63c",
          "title": "$4,025,729 · Historical grant award",
          "text": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Financial details: value: 4,025,729; currency: USD; kind: grant award; period: 2023-04 Amount basis: indexed award"
        },
        {
          "edge": "e63d",
          "title": "$1,866,559 · Exit grant award",
          "text": "Indexed first-party historical award record; not verified cash received or current sponsorship. Source identifies this as an exit grant. Financial details: value: 1,866,559; currency: USD; kind: exit grant award; period: 2023-10 Amount basis: indexed award"
        },
        {
          "edge": "w2-fli-e-lightcone25",
          "title": "related party grant received",
          "text": "Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation Financial details: value: 45,197,838; currency: USD; kind: grant receipt; period: FY2025 What remains unestablished: Separate entity from Europe; no tracing to particular historical donation"
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/overview-risk",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "overview-risk",
        "title": "AI foundations & creators",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "fli",
            "title": "Future of Life Institute",
            "sub": "EIN 47-1052538. Grantmaking, research and advocacy; affiliated asset transfers must not be added to persuasion spending. Named co-signatory of the June 2025 AI moratorium opposition letter.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "vitalik",
            "title": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "sub": "2021 SHIB support confirmed. Total gift or liquidation value not established; FLI says gift unconditional and no decision role.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "lightcone",
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "sub": "Nevada charity EIN 92-0636259. Not Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong or other similarly named entities.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "tegmark",
            "title": "Max Erik Tegmark",
            "sub": "FLI founder/chair in current September 2026 biography; overlapping 2024 Lightcone governance.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "cais",
            "title": "Center for AI Safety",
            "sub": "CAIS EIN 88-1751310. Separate from its Action Fund.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "FLI and CAIS board bridge. Former DeepMind investor-director.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "goodventures",
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "sub": "Historical CAIS award inventory ends with October 2023 exit grant. Not established current sponsor.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "frame",
            "title": "Frame Fellowship",
            "sub": "Shared creator training and placement infrastructure; independent and amplifier tracks.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "talos",
            "title": "Talos Network",
            "sub": "Membership and donor disclosure; gifts not earmarked to Eva Behrens on the retrieved record.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e42",
          "e43",
          "e44",
          "e45",
          "e48",
          "e49",
          "e54",
          "e55",
          "e65",
          "e76",
          "e117",
          "e63a",
          "e63b",
          "e63c",
          "e63d",
          "w2-fli-e-lightcone25"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-overview-industry",
      "number": "M34",
      "node": "ltf",
      "title": "Industry & electoral advocacy",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "claim": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "why": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "edges": [
        "e144",
        "e145",
        "e146",
        "e148",
        "e149",
        "e150"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e144",
          "title": "$50m across two filed contributions",
          "text": "$25m August 22, 2025 and $25m February 11, 2026. Partnership/member attributions are not extra contributions."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e145",
          "title": "$12.5m individual contribution",
          "text": "Filed September 12, 2025. Not an OpenAI corporate transfer."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e146",
          "title": "$12.5m individual contribution",
          "text": "Filed September 12, 2025."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e148",
          "title": "$40m total announced support",
          "text": "July 21, 2026 announcement restricts election spending. Not independently audited payment here; distinct from People First Marketing."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e149",
          "title": "Reported affiliation",
          "text": "Secondary reporting; no transfer of named FEC donations traced to Build American AI."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e150",
          "title": "Reported intermediary pathway",
          "text": "Secondary report describes creator solicitation route; donor-to-creator allocation untraced."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/overview-industry",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "overview-industry",
        "title": "Industry & electoral advocacy",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "ltf",
            "title": "Leading the Future",
            "sub": "FEC C00916114; $75,788,224.10 receipts through June 30, 2026.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "a16z",
            "title": "a16z Capital Management",
            "sub": "Two filed $25m contributions to LTF.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "gregbrockman",
            "title": "Greg Brockman",
            "sub": "$12.5m individual contribution; not an OpenAI corporate payment.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "annabrockman",
            "title": "Anna Brockman",
            "sub": "$12.5m individual contribution.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Announced restricted support for Public First Action.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "publicfirst",
            "title": "Public First Action",
            "sub": "Separate from People First Marketing; Anthropic election-spending restriction.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "buildai",
            "title": "Build American AI",
            "sub": "LTF affiliation and creator intermediary relationship reported by WIRED; no donor-to-creator allocation traced.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sm4",
            "title": "SM4",
            "sub": "Reported creator-pitch intermediary.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e144",
          "e145",
          "e146",
          "e148",
          "e149",
          "e150"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-overview-rights",
      "number": "M35",
      "node": "5rights",
      "title": "Digital-rights policy & funders",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "claim": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "why": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "edges": [
        "e0",
        "e1",
        "e153",
        "e154",
        "e155",
        "e157",
        "e158",
        "e160",
        "e162",
        "e163",
        "w7-adv-e-chair"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e0",
          "title": "founded",
          "text": "5Rights identifies Beeban Kidron as its founder."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e1",
          "title": "Sponsored California adaptation",
          "text": "Original2022 California analyses confirm5Rights co-sponsorship. Chaptered text under18 coverage and allowed applying child protections to all consumers instead of estimating age. Kidron sought under18, but causation of the final provision and present enforceability were not assessed."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e153",
          "title": "$600k paid · 2021",
          "text": "General operating support paid during 2021; no earmarking to the lobbying contract established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e154",
          "title": "$850k paid · 2023",
          "text": "General operating support paid during 2023; this later payment cannot fund an earlier 2022 transaction without additional evidence."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e155",
          "title": "Acknowledged coalition support",
          "text": "Funder credits support with Reset for mobilisation and passage of California’s code."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e157",
          "title": "$50k · paid lobbying contract",
          "text": "Contract for May-September2022 services at USD10,000/month; five USD10,000 receipts are reported over date ranges, not exact bank dates. Client owns contract work including drafts; specified nonpublic disclosure and expenses require consent/advance approval. No blanket editorial-approval clause or exercised output approval established. Neither a UK-government source nor the later2023 Oak award is established as this contract funding. Financial details: value: 50,000; currency: USD; kind: five registrant-reported receipts; period: Ranges June2-October4,2022 for May-September services; see filingp21"
        },
        {
          "edge": "e158",
          "title": "Lobbying and amendment negotiation",
          "text": "Registrant logs record actual background-sheet exchanges, proposed author amendments, coalition-letter submissions and negotiations in2022. Separately filed letters and California analyses supply work-product counterparts. Filing and transmission do not establish authorship or client approval of every item."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e160",
          "title": "$2m award / 3 years",
          "text": "Core-support award in the 2023 report; not an annual payment."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e162",
          "title": "£745,500 award · 2025–28",
          "text": "Core work including legal standards, research, compliance and technical norms."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e163",
          "title": "£150k award · AI / EdTech",
          "text": "Research award; cash disbursement not verified. Historical zero disbursement field is not a current payment total."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w7-adv-e-chair",
          "title": "declared chair role in debate",
          "text": "At the new Report stage Kidron declared that she chaired 5Rights Foundation."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/overview-rights",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "overview-rights",
        "title": "Digital-rights policy & funders",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "5rights",
            "title": "5Rights",
            "sub": "UK foundation advocating child-centred digital regulation. Donor records and a US lobbying contract are documented. Online-safety advocacy organisation founded by Beeban Kidron; California code sponsor.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "omidyar",
            "title": "Omidyar Network",
            "sub": "Omidyar Network Fund Inc; charitable grants are not eBay corporate payments.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "oak",
            "title": "Oak Foundation",
            "sub": "Common funder of 5Rights and WeProtect. Awards alone do not establish direction over recipient campaigns.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "kidron",
            "title": "Beeban Kidron",
            "sub": "Founder of 5Rights and sponsor of the ControlAI-backed July 2026 amendment. Shared participation does not earmark 5Rights grants to ControlAI. ControlAI-listed supporter and Lords Amendment 84 sponsor. Other investigation maps her 5Rights role. 5Rights founder and listed sponsor of the 2026 AI emergency-shutdown amendment.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "capitol-connection",
            "title": "Capitol Connection",
            "sub": "capconn LLC. Paid contractor to 5Rights for California AB2273 lobbying.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ab2273",
            "title": "California AB2273",
            "sub": "2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code campaign. Current enforcement and litigation are outside this investigation.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rothschild-foundation",
            "title": "Rothschild Foundation",
            "sub": "Specific UK charity 1138145; not a proxy for every institution with this name.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "prudence",
            "title": "Prudence Trust",
            "sub": "Published multiyear core-work award to 5Rights.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e0",
          "e1",
          "e153",
          "e154",
          "e155",
          "e157",
          "e158",
          "e160",
          "e162",
          "e163",
          "w7-adv-e-chair"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-overview-control",
      "number": "M36",
      "node": "controlai",
      "title": "ControlAI & political access",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "claim": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "why": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "edges": [
        "e83",
        "e84",
        "e85",
        "e86",
        "e88",
        "e89",
        "e96",
        "e97",
        "e130",
        "e137",
        "e174"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e83",
          "title": "Creator Outreach & Systems Lead",
          "text": "Organization biography at cutoff."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e84",
          "title": "UK operating / trading identity",
          "text": "Privacy notice connects Secure Future Research Ltd to ControlAI. Entity relation, not a payment."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e85",
          "title": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
          "text": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e86",
          "title": ">25–50% votes; appointment rights",
          "text": "Each director/PSC has >25% and <=50% voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. No share capital; not a precise equity stake or sole control."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e88",
          "title": "Founder / CEO",
          "text": "Operational title does not override dual UK legal control."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e89",
          "title": "Special Projects Lead",
          "text": "Operational biography; detailed budget-signature arrangements unknown."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e96",
          "title": "Former policy / strategy leadership",
          "text": "2025 parliamentary biography describes former Head of Strategy and Governance. 2022 title was Head of AI Policy and Governance; not founder."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e97",
          "title": "Operations work in 2025",
          "text": "Self-description and May 2025 privacy notice. Conjecture work subsequently ended operationally per Leahy; no current continuity inferred."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e130",
          "title": "Executive member, 2011–2012",
          "text": "Original 2012 annual-report roster. Later publication relationship does not prove uninterrupted executive membership."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e137",
          "title": "Listed campaign supporter",
          "text": "ControlAI's public statement lists supporter. Does not establish endorsement of every subsequent draft/tactic, compensation, or Fabian institutional direction."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e174",
          "title": "claimed membership of",
          "text": "CASIR’s own unfinished site lists this organisation. No reciprocal confirmation, incorporation, donor commitment or executed grant was found."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/overview-control",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "overview-control",
        "title": "ControlAI & political access",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "UK campaign traded by Secure Future Research. Existing major donors and grant conditions remain unresolved. AI advocacy organisation named in Hansard as the origin of emergency-shutdown proposals.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miotti",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti",
            "sub": "ControlAI founder/CEO; UK director and voting/appointment rights.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "behrens",
            "title": "Eva Behrens",
            "sub": "ControlAI Special Projects Lead; UK director and voting/appointment rights.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "conjecture",
            "title": "Conjecture",
            "sub": "2022 venture-backed alignment startup. Leahy described operational ending in March 2026, not corporate dissolution.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "winga",
            "title": "Max Winga",
            "sub": "ControlAI Creator Outreach & Systems Lead; Frame past mentor.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sfr",
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd",
            "sub": "UK 15088415, limited by guarantee without share capital. Two named legal controllers; no exact 50/50 split inferred.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "fabians",
            "title": "Fabian Society",
            "sub": "Named current/former leadership overlaps. No Society-to-ControlAI funding, commissioning or direction established.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sobel",
            "title": "Alex Sobel",
            "sub": "MP, historical Fabian executive; ControlAI-backed legislative activity.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "casir",
            "title": "CASIR · draft",
            "sub": "Unincorporated, unfinished proposed fund. Its site claims affiliations without reciprocal confirmation; no verified donor commitment or executed grant.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e83",
          "e84",
          "e85",
          "e86",
          "e88",
          "e89",
          "e96",
          "e97",
          "e130",
          "e137",
          "e174"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-overview-safety",
      "number": "M37",
      "node": "ncose",
      "title": "Content & payment campaigns",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "claim": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "why": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "edges": [
        "e4",
        "e5",
        "e6",
        "e7",
        "e8",
        "e9",
        "e11",
        "e13"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e4",
          "title": "Organised open letter",
          "text": "Collective Shout published the 10 July letter requesting payment-company leadership stop processing for the targeted game platforms."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e5",
          "title": "Co-signed through Haley McNamara",
          "text": "Haley McNamara signed for NCOSE. Public campaign endorsement; no transfer of funds or directing authority established."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e6",
          "title": "Co-signatory",
          "text": "Jon Rouse signed the open letter in his professional identification. No financial or legal authority relationship is stated."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e7",
          "title": "Signed for Collective Shout",
          "text": "Melinda Tankard Reist signed the payment-company letter for Collective Shout."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e8",
          "title": "Movement Director",
          "text": "Trial roster identifies Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e9",
          "title": "Requested processing withdrawal",
          "text": "Letter addressed PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. It was a pressure campaign and request, not a legally binding order."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e11",
          "title": "Platform reported campaign effects",
          "text": "itch.io attributed processor scrutiny and its broad adult-content deindexing to the campaign. Underlying private processor instructions were not obtained; Mastercard denied directly requiring game restrictions."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e13",
          "title": "Co-signatory",
          "text": "NCOSE appears among more than 140 organisations opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation. A bounded joint advocacy act, not a general alliance."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/overview-safety",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "overview-safety",
        "title": "Content & payment campaigns",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "ncose",
            "title": "NCOSE",
            "sub": "National Center on Sexual Exploitation; public co-signatory linking two distinct campaigns.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ai-moratorium-letter",
            "title": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
            "sub": "Shared letter/artifact. This map represents only selected signatories, not the full set of more than 140. A letter is not a directing organisation.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "collective-shout",
            "title": "Collective Shout",
            "sub": "Australian campaigning organisation. Old corpus claim of Basic Religious Charity exemption was contradicted; no donor secrecy inference retained.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "tankard-reist",
            "title": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "sub": "Collective Shout Movement Director; payment-letter signatory and trial stakeholder adviser.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rouse",
            "title": "Jon Rouse",
            "sub": "Payment-letter signatory and chair of the completed Australian trial's stakeholder advisory board.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-campaign",
            "title": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "sub": "Open letter requested payment companies stop processing for targeted game platforms.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-processors",
            "title": "Payment-letter addressees",
            "sub": "Collection: PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. Letter recipients, not a single legal entity or operational controller.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "itch-io",
            "title": "itch.io",
            "sub": "Platform attributed processor scrutiny and adult-content deindexing to Collective Shout's campaign; private processor correspondence was not obtained.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e4",
          "e5",
          "e6",
          "e7",
          "e8",
          "e9",
          "e11",
          "e13"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "map-overview-state",
      "number": "M38",
      "node": "weprotect",
      "title": "Regulators, alliances & trials",
      "gate": "",
      "dek": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "claim": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
      "why": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "edges": [
        "e18",
        "e30",
        "e31",
        "e32",
        "e166",
        "e167",
        "e168",
        "e169",
        "e183",
        "n33",
        "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
        "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access"
      ],
      "steps": [
        {
          "edge": "e18",
          "title": "Stakeholder advice",
          "text": "Stakeholder advisory board supported the trial. It was not a statutory regulator and no ongoing 2026 mandate is inferred from the live roster."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e30",
          "title": "Commissioner",
          "text": "Official ACMA/eSafety report records the commissioner's role; source period is 2023–24."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e31",
          "title": "Board role",
          "text": "Official annual report records WeProtect board membership in 2023–24. Root's separate current governance evidence may support a current edge."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e32",
          "title": "Digital Safety coalition participation",
          "text": "Official annual report records participation in WEF's Global Coalition for Digital Safety. This is distinct from WEF's Digital Trust programme and establishes no WEF control over eSafety."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e166",
          "title": "Historical sole donor · 2021",
          "text": "UK strategy describes sole financial donor status up to that point. Subsequent donors mean this is not a current sole-funder claim. Amount not specified."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e167",
          "title": "Permanent board seat",
          "text": "Government records a permanent seat; current board page includes Home Office representation."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e168",
          "title": "Board representation",
          "text": "Published governance page records institutional board participation; distinct from ownership."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e169",
          "title": "Briefed board on EU proposal",
          "text": "July 2022 minutes record a Commission briefing to the WeProtect board and possible requests for assistance. Particular requests and resulting outputs are not established by this record."
        },
        {
          "edge": "e183",
          "title": "Institutional board representation",
          "text": "Current governance page includes eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant; separate from WEF’s policy work."
        },
        {
          "edge": "n33",
          "title": "Briefed board on five-country work",
          "text": "June 2024 minutes record the Home Office update and an August response timeframe for early September ministerial meetings in Australia. Final briefings/adoption not recovered."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
          "title": "recorded objections on sampling, safeguarding and circumvention",
          "text": "March minutes preserve substantive challenge and assigned follow-up actions."
        },
        {
          "edge": "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access",
          "title": "reported withholding detailed vendor sections during legal review",
          "text": "SAB had A/B/K while vendors had their own extracts; identified review windows need draft/redline reconciliation."
        }
      ],
      "recourse": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
      "alternative": "",
      "test": "",
      "url": "/maps/overview-state",
      "_raw": {
        "id": "overview-state",
        "title": "Regulators, alliances & trials",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "weprotect",
            "title": "WeProtect",
            "sub": "International alliance with government, industry and NGO board participation. UK and Dutch entities/accounts require careful separation. Participated in WEF digital-safety principles working group; separate from WEF.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "home-office",
            "title": "UK Home Office",
            "sub": "Government records historical funding and a permanent WeProtect board seat.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "european-commission",
            "title": "European Commission",
            "sub": "WeProtect board representation; proposal briefing and possible assistance requests recorded in July 2022 minutes.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "wef",
            "title": "World Economic Forum",
            "sub": "Browne republication and NTI event links here; online-safety institutional links mapped separately. Convened Global Coalition for Digital Safety and related principles work. Digital Trust is a different WEF programme.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "esafety",
            "title": "Australian eSafety",
            "sub": "Regulator with formal international policy relationships; age-assurance trial board is a different body.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "inman-grant",
            "title": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "sub": "eSafety Commissioner; WeProtect board and WEF coalition involvement recorded in 2023–24 official report.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "au-age-trial",
            "title": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "sub": "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "trial-board",
            "title": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "sub": "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "avpa",
            "title": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "sub": "Age-verification industry association. Its technical evidence is expressly credited in Ofcom’s January 2025 acceptance of email-based estimation; older Australian trial participation remains separately recorded.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e18",
          "e30",
          "e31",
          "e32",
          "e166",
          "e167",
          "e168",
          "e169",
          "e183",
          "n33",
          "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
          "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sanders-ai",
      "number": "43",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Sanders: advice, advocacy and proposed authority",
      "dek": "A direct ControlAI connection, political allies and a proposed federal AI gate.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "w34-sanders-bernie",
      "edges": [
        "w34-sanders-adv-e-001",
        "w34-sanders-fin-e-principal-committee",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-01",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-02",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-03",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-04",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-05",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-06",
        "w34-sanders-coal-e-07",
        "w34-sanders-root-e-agency"
      ],
      "claim": "Policy influence can reach legislation through advice and campaigning without a proven campaign-donation route.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Identify the advice",
          "text": "ControlAI says it consulted; its preferred scope differs from Sanders’s pause.",
          "edge": "w34-sanders-adv-e-001"
        },
        {
          "title": "Locate public authority",
          "text": "The proposed regulator would oversee advanced AI and enforce a prohibition.",
          "edge": "w34-sanders-root-e-agency"
        },
        {
          "title": "Inspect the opposition",
          "text": "ITIF criticizes the exact proposal; the network contains competing positions.",
          "edge": "w34-sanders-coal-e-05"
        }
      ],
      "why": "The different routes explain what each actor can contribute: money, access, expertise, mobilization or legal authority.",
      "alternative": "Lawmakers and researchers may share sincerely held safety concerns while disagreeing on the remedy.",
      "test": "Recover the full bill, drafting correspondence, consultation terms and actual appointments before assigning clause-level or regulatory control.",
      "recourse": "The one-page sponsor summary does not establish the full review and appeal procedure. The separate ControlAI draft contains court safeguards that cannot automatically be imported into this proposal."
    },
    {
      "id": "miri-money",
      "number": "44",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "MIRI: money and institutional responsibility",
      "dek": "Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "coefficient",
      "edges": [
        "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil",
        "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik",
        "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff",
        "w35-e-y-r-anon-gift",
        "w35-e-y-r-founder",
        "w35-e-y-r-ceo",
        "w35-e-y-r-president"
      ],
      "claim": "Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Acknowledged historical support",
          "text": "Coefficient Giving → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $15,925,143; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
          "edge": "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil"
        },
        {
          "title": "Acknowledged historical support",
          "text": "Vitalik Buterin → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $5,411,216; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
          "edge": "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik"
        },
        {
          "title": "Acknowledged historical support",
          "text": "Survival and Flourishing Fund → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $3,372,000; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology.",
          "edge": "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.",
      "alternative": "Cumulative acknowledged support includes matching credit. Donor support is not a current campaign allocation or personal income. The anonymous 2021 gift is separately dated.",
      "test": "Inspect the cited records and distinguish historical support, roles, communication and proposed powers.",
      "recourse": "Cumulative acknowledged support includes matching credit. Donor support is not a current campaign allocation or personal income. The anonymous 2021 gift is separately dated."
    },
    {
      "id": "yudkowsky-persuasion",
      "number": "45",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Yudkowsky: writing, audiences and political access",
      "dek": "Follow adaptations, book promotion and the documented Sanders briefing.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "yudkowsky",
      "edges": [
        "w35-e-y-r-book-yud",
        "w35-e-y-r-book-nate",
        "w35-e-y-r-promotes",
        "w35-e-ra-adapts",
        "w35-e-ca-ra",
        "w35-e-y-r-sanders-yud",
        "w35-e-y-r-sanders-nate"
      ],
      "claim": "Follow adaptations, book promotion and the documented Sanders briefing.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Coauthor",
          "text": "Eliezer Yudkowsky → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
          "edge": "w35-e-y-r-book-yud"
        },
        {
          "title": "Coauthor",
          "text": "Nate Soares → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: coauthor.",
          "edge": "w35-e-y-r-book-nate"
        },
        {
          "title": "Promotes the book",
          "text": "ControlAI → If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: promotes the book.",
          "edge": "w35-e-y-r-promotes"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Follow adaptations, book promotion and the documented Sanders briefing.",
      "alternative": "Adaptation, recommendation, sponsorship and access are different relationships. There is no inferred bill-authorship or command edge.",
      "test": "Inspect the cited records and distinguish historical support, roles, communication and proposed powers.",
      "recourse": "Adaptation, recommendation, sponsorship and access are different relationships. There is no inferred bill-authorship or command edge."
    },
    {
      "id": "controlai-sabine",
      "number": "46",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "The Sabine approach: sponsor, account and campaign",
      "dek": "ControlAI identifies itself; the two accounts dispute editorial demands.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "winga",
      "edges": [
        "w35-e-winga-outreach",
        "w35-e-miotti-outreach",
        "w35-e-ca-program",
        "w35-e-ca-sabine",
        "w35-e-ca-ra"
      ],
      "claim": "ControlAI identifies itself; the two accounts dispute editorial demands.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Outreach lead; coauthors public account",
          "text": "Max Winga coauthored the September 8 explanation and is the programme’s listed contact.",
          "edge": "w35-e-winga-outreach"
        },
        {
          "title": "Coauthors public account",
          "text": "Andrea Miotti coauthored the response identifying ControlAI and explaining its creator partnerships.",
          "edge": "w35-e-miotti-outreach"
        },
        {
          "title": "Runs creator partnerships",
          "text": "ControlAI describes a creator programme supporting its campaign for an international ASI ban.",
          "edge": "w35-e-ca-program"
        }
      ],
      "why": "ControlAI identifies itself; the two accounts dispute editorial demands.",
      "alternative": "The offer is not recorded as a completed sponsorship. ControlAI’s response is self-reported, and the emails have not been published.",
      "test": "Inspect the cited records and distinguish historical support, roles, communication and proposed powers.",
      "recourse": "The offer is not recorded as a completed sponsorship. ControlAI’s response is self-reported, and the emails have not been published."
    },
    {
      "id": "rohan-paul-publishing",
      "number": "47",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and distribution",
      "dek": "Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "w35-pika",
      "edges": [
        "w35-e-r-rel-founder",
        "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika",
        "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo",
        "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-wsj",
        "w35-e-r-rel-anthropic",
        "w35-e-r-rel-sacks"
      ],
      "claim": "Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Identifies as founder and writer",
          "text": "Identifies as founder and writer. Self-identification; legal ownership not established.",
          "edge": "w35-e-r-rel-founder"
        },
        {
          "title": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
          "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 28 February 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
          "edge": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika"
        },
        {
          "title": "Disclosed edition sponsor",
          "text": "Disclosed edition sponsor. 11 July 2026. Amount, payer legal identity, contract, transfer and unrelated editorial scope unseen.",
          "edge": "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.",
      "alternative": "No ControlAI/FLI commission was established. A quoted warning, a recommended post and a sponsorship are different relationships.",
      "test": "Inspect the cited records and distinguish historical support, roles, communication and proposed powers.",
      "recourse": "No ControlAI/FLI commission was established. A quoted warning, a recommended post and a sponsorship are different relationships."
    },
    {
      "id": "tallinn-funding",
      "number": "48",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Tallinn: funding routes and decision rights",
      "dek": "Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "tallinn",
      "edges": [
        "w36-e-vehicle",
        "w36-e-control-2023",
        "w36-e-control-2024",
        "w36-e-legal",
        "w36-e-allocation",
        "w36-e-sfc-client",
        "w36-e-sfc-sff",
        "w36-e-aipi",
        "w36-e-caisaction"
      ],
      "claim": "Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Identifies as his holding company",
          "text": "Tallinn’s donor-ledger footnote identifies Slimrock as one of his holding companies. ",
          "edge": "w36-e-vehicle"
        },
        {
          "title": "£500,000 donation, November 2023",
          "text": "Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 14 November 2023; USD ledger equivalent $615,850. Donor report; no allocation to a particular creator or campaign.",
          "edge": "w36-e-control-2023"
        },
        {
          "title": "£2m donation, April 2024",
          "text": "Tallinn reports £2m disbursed through Slimrock to Secure Future Research on 10 April 2024; USD ledger equivalent $2,546,200. Do not infer a donor-dependence percentage from the filed balance sheets.",
          "edge": "w36-e-control-2024"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.",
      "alternative": "Amounts cover different periods. Donor support, investment and decision authority are separate relationships.",
      "test": "Inspect the supporting records, then compare the terms, decision rights and dated outcomes.",
      "recourse": "Amounts cover different periods. Donor support, investment and decision authority are separate relationships."
    },
    {
      "id": "tallinn-media-funding",
      "number": "49",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "How pooled funding reaches media",
      "dek": "A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "tallinn",
      "edges": [
        "w36-e-aitof",
        "w36-e-vanguard",
        "w36-e-manager",
        "w36-e-frame",
        "w36-e-film",
        "w36-e-director",
        "w36-e-tarbell"
      ],
      "claim": "A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "$786,994 designated contribution, 2024",
          "text": "Tallinn records $786,994 via SFF to Vanguard Charitable for account A2003126, AISTOF, on 27 November 2024. Pooled fund; no allocation of this contribution to a specific downstream project.",
          "edge": "w36-e-aitof"
        },
        {
          "title": "Named payee for designated account",
          "text": "The donor ledger names Vanguard Charitable as payee for the AISTOF-designated account. Same upstream transfer, not another donation.",
          "edge": "w36-e-vanguard"
        },
        {
          "title": "Runs pooled fund",
          "text": "Zhang’s public biography identifies him as running AISTOF, a pooled multi-donor fund. ",
          "edge": "w36-e-manager"
        }
      ],
      "why": "A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.",
      "alternative": "A pooled fund’s downstream grant cannot be allocated to one donor without another record. Frame asserts editorial independence.",
      "test": "Inspect the supporting records, then compare the terms, decision rights and dated outcomes.",
      "recourse": "A pooled fund’s downstream grant cannot be allocated to one donor without another record. Frame asserts editorial independence."
    },
    {
      "id": "policy-and-public-pressure",
      "number": "50",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Policy drafting and organized public pressure",
      "dek": "Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "tallinn",
      "edges": [
        "w36-e-cltr",
        "w36-e-pauseglobal",
        "w36-e-draft",
        "w36-e-publish",
        "w36-e-pa-control",
        "w36-e-pa-fli",
        "w36-e-pa-miri",
        "w36-e-micro",
        "w36-e-roadmap"
      ],
      "claim": "Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "$4.466m across seven 2021–2024 entries",
          "text": "Tallinn’s ledger reports seven CLTR-related payments totaling $4,466,000 during 2021–2024. Historical donor report; overlaps with recipient and SFF reports.",
          "edge": "w36-e-cltr"
        },
        {
          "title": "$30,000 across two 2024 entries",
          "text": "Tallinn reports $20,000 in March and $10,000 in November 2024 for Stichting PauseAI. ",
          "edge": "w36-e-pauseglobal"
        },
        {
          "title": "Claims section authorship",
          "text": "CLTR reports authoring the model-reporting and information-sharing section. The government acknowledges it among contributors. Participation corroborated; exact section authorship remains CLTR’s account.",
          "edge": "w36-e-draft"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.",
      "alternative": "Outside input is not enacted law. The roadmap is conditional; declared counterparts do not establish command.",
      "test": "Inspect the supporting records, then compare the terms, decision rights and dated outcomes.",
      "recourse": "Outside input is not enacted law. The roadmap is conditional; declared counterparts do not establish command."
    },
    {
      "id": "lightcone-finance",
      "number": "51",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Lightcone: loans and future-donation offsets",
      "dek": "Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "tallinn",
      "edges": [
        "w36-e-sgowner",
        "w36-e-loan",
        "w36-e-advance"
      ],
      "claim": "Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Reported company owner",
          "text": "Habryka identifies Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. as Tallinn-owned in his March 2023 financing account. Borrower-side public statement; ownership instruments not inspected.",
          "edge": "w36-e-sgowner"
        },
        {
          "title": "$20m reported property loan",
          "text": "Habryka describes $16.5m for property purchase and $3.5m for renovations, lent by Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. Loan, not grant. Executed terms, collateral and current balance remain unexamined.",
          "edge": "w36-e-loan"
        },
        {
          "title": "Settlement advance offsets later grants",
          "text": "Lightcone’s 2025 fundraiser describes a $1.7m FTX-settlement arrangement involving Tallinn and SFC, with half of later grant recommendations withheld until $1.29m is offset. Separate from the property mortgage; not an unrestricted new annual grant.",
          "edge": "w36-e-advance"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.",
      "alternative": "Lightcone Infrastructure is distinct from Lightcone Foundation. Borrower reports establish the stated arrangements; legal instruments and current balances remain open.",
      "test": "Inspect the supporting records, then compare the terms, decision rights and dated outcomes.",
      "recourse": "Lightcone Infrastructure is distinct from Lightcone Foundation. Borrower reports establish the stated arrangements; legal instruments and current balances remain open."
    },
    {
      "id": "civic-shout-business",
      "number": "52",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "The business behind the petition",
      "dek": "Civic Shout sells supporters and traffic, recruits coalition participants and rewards distribution through distinct credit and cash programs. A public filing identifies a political purchaser; a charitable project offers another route into audience-building.",
      "duration": "6 min",
      "node": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
      "edges": [
        "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments",
        "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated",
        "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer",
        "w37-civic-e-affiliate-operated",
        "w37-civic-e-ceo",
        "w37-civic-e-cofounder",
        "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-lead",
        "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated",
        "w37-civic-e-foundation-sponsored",
        "w37-civic-e-nelson-foundation",
        "w37-civic-e-golden-foundation",
        "w37-civic-e-action-collective-participant"
      ],
      "claim": "The petition platform is also a selective market for attention: services, incentives and admission rules shape which campaigns gain supporters.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Reported USD1,500 in platform purchases",
          "text": "BLUEVOTE.ORG reports USD 500 on 2025-09-02 and USD 1000 on 2025-12-24 for Advocacy platform, transactions SB21B.4423/.4424. Selected filing, not complete revenue, equity or AI-campaign funding.",
          "edge": "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments"
        },
        {
          "title": "Controls Joint Action admission and credits",
          "text": "Civic Shout retains discretion over hosts, participation, referral attribution, validity and credit issuance. Published powers, not an audit of individual decisions.",
          "edge": "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated"
        },
        {
          "title": "Offers noncash referral credits",
          "text": "The AI petition offers USD 2.25 in advertising credits, equal to three eligible national CPC clicks, per qualifying referred signature. No cash value; actual issuance, redemption, spend and delivery unverified.",
          "edge": "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer"
        }
      ],
      "why": "A petition can simultaneously pressure a decision-maker, grow a host’s list and earn a recruiting group resources for its next campaign. The business rules identify who decides and who benefits.",
      "alternative": "Published offers are not realized spending. Selected FEC purchases do not establish AI-campaign allocation. Fiscal sponsorship is not company ownership. Civic Shout, Action Collective and Collective Shout are distinct names; no Civic–Collective affiliation is established.",
      "test": "Compare campaign orders, credit-redemption records and actual referrals with the published rules; inspect LLC and sponsorship agreements before assigning ownership or control.",
      "recourse": "Supporters can use the published consent and unsubscribe mechanisms. Participant contracts and campaign disclosures are the next evidence for allocations and decision rights."
    },
    {
      "id": "andreessen-capital-and-policy",
      "number": "53",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Andreessen: capital and policy",
      "dek": "Follow Andreessen's personal political receipt, a16z's investment and advocacy routes, and Meta's documented corporate oversight role.",
      "duration": "7 min",
      "node": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "edges": [
        "w37-marc-e-role",
        "w37-marc-e-meta",
        "w37-marc-e-rfa",
        "w37-marc-e-fairshake47",
        "w37-marc-e-fairshake26",
        "w37-marc-e-machine",
        "w37-marc-e-volta",
        "w37-marc-e-openai",
        "w37-marc-e-anduril",
        "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril",
        "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai",
        "w37-marc-e-ostp",
        "w37-marc-e-msft-policy",
        "w37-marc-e-defense"
      ],
      "claim": "Investment, political giving, policy submissions and corporate oversight supply distinct routes to influence over the AI market.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "personal political contribution",
          "text": "Schedule A p6 records Marc Andreessen $2.5m; SA11A.12495; employer A16Z. A16Z employer field is not donor identity. One checked receipt, not complete cycle/lifetime total.",
          "edge": "w37-marc-e-rfa"
        },
        {
          "title": "co-leads financing round",
          "text": "OpenAI names a16z as co-lead in round containing $122bn committed capital. Whole-round capital is not a16z's contribution or proof all capital was disbursed. No a16z board/veto/safety-policy rights disclosed.",
          "edge": "w37-marc-e-openai"
        },
        {
          "title": "submits AI Action Plan recommendations",
          "text": "Formal AH Capital Management LLC/a16z submission seeks federal preemption of state model-development restrictions and compute/talent investment, preserving state harm enforcement. Submitted institutional position is not adopted law or proof of causal influence. Source legal name differs from current corpus label; preserve brand mapping without inventing another donor.",
          "edge": "w37-marc-e-ostp"
        },
        {
          "title": "director; Risk & Strategy Committee member",
          "text": "Current roster places Andreessen on Meta's board and Risk & Strategy Committee. Charter provides strategic review, recommendations and adviser-retention functions. Collective oversight, not unilateral AI control; members removable by board; most committee functions may be performed by board.",
          "edge": "w37-marc-e-meta"
        },
        {
          "title": "coauthors joint AI policy statement",
          "text": "Andreessen/Horowitz and Nadella/Smith jointly publish AI for Startups, proposing collaboration across Little and Big Tech. Joint policy statement is not merger, investment, contract or complete policy alignment.",
          "edge": "w37-marc-e-msft-policy"
        }
      ],
      "why": "The records show which institution supplied money, proposed rules or held authority, so an association is not mistaken for a control right.",
      "alternative": "Personal gifts, firm contributions, investment, policy advocacy and corporate authority are different relationships. Round and fund headlines are not individual checks. Shared markets do not establish unified control.",
      "test": "Inspect the dated receipts, financing announcements, submission and committee charter; seek the missing contracts and decision records before inferring control.",
      "recourse": "The crucial tests are investor-specific rights, donor restrictions, final adopted rules and customer obligations—not an aggregate of overlapping money headlines."
    },
    {
      "id": "palantir-contracts-and-control",
      "number": "54",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Palantir: contracts and control",
      "dek": "Karp's company connects AI suppliers to state operations. Its founders, customers, hosts and courts hold different powers.",
      "duration": "6 min",
      "node": "w37-karp-alex",
      "edges": [
        "w37-karp-e-instruction-alex",
        "w37-karp-e-instruction-thiel",
        "w37-karp-e-instruction-cohen",
        "w37-karp-e-votes",
        "w37-karp-e-army-ea",
        "w37-karp-e-titan-p",
        "w37-karp-e-titan-a",
        "w37-karp-e-ms",
        "w37-karp-e-openai",
        "w37-karp-e-claude",
        "w37-karp-e-aws",
        "w37-karp-e-anduril",
        "w37-karp-e-inaugural",
        "w37-karp-e-court-relief",
        "w37-karp-e-court-choice",
        "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary"
      ],
      "claim": "Palantir's position joins concentrated corporate voting with government procurement and model-distribution infrastructure, while retaining separate decision makers and constraints.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Class F voting mechanism",
          "text": "Subject to its threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999%. Not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes, or majority economic ownership.",
          "edge": "w37-karp-e-votes"
        },
        {
          "title": "Up to $10bn purchasing capacity",
          "text": "The July 2025 enterprise agreement consolidates 75 contracts for up to ten years. The Army expressly says the cap is not a specific obligation or commitment.",
          "edge": "w37-karp-e-army-ea"
        },
        {
          "title": "Claude integration announced",
          "text": "The November 2024 issuer release combines Claude, AIP, SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment. Historical integration announcement; current deployment continuity is not established after the 2026 dispute. No equity terms disclosed.",
          "edge": "w37-karp-e-claude"
        },
        {
          "title": "Contractual use limits; no technical veto",
          "text": "The court's factual account describes Claude Gov restrictions as contractual, without Anthropic visibility into DoW prompts or technical intervention in deployed behavior. Scoped to the court's described national-security deployment; not all Anthropic products. DoW controlled future deployment.",
          "edge": "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary"
        },
        {
          "title": "Lawful supplier choice preserved",
          "text": "Paragraph 14 expressly allows lawful transition to another AI provider and does not require continued Anthropic use. The court decision does not establish restored contracts or particular deployments.",
          "edge": "w37-karp-e-court-choice"
        }
      ],
      "why": "The relevant chain is who can direct votes, buy or refuse orders, enable infrastructure, negotiate use limits and decide deployments.",
      "alternative": "A shared investor or an announced partnership does not establish common command. Security approval, commercial terms and actual operational use must be examined separately.",
      "test": "Inspect founder instructions, contract orders and use terms. Compare a claimed model veto with the technical and contractual rights described by the court.",
      "recourse": "Preserve procurement remedies, independent legal review and the distinction between a supplier's contractual redlines and technical control."
    },
    {
      "id": "policy-funding-and-conditions",
      "number": "55",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Funding policy work and organizing",
      "dek": "Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "coefficient",
      "edges": [
        "w37-policy-e-cltr-commitment",
        "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll",
        "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal",
        "w37-policy-e-stipend-operation",
        "w37-policy-e-micro-renewal"
      ],
      "claim": "Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "£4m commitment plus matching offer",
          "text": "CLTR’s report published in 2025 describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment and separate matching up to £3m. Recipient-reported commitments; not £7m of established receipts. Report states grant commitments deny influence over strategic priorities.",
          "edge": "w37-policy-e-cltr-commitment"
        },
        {
          "title": "Commissioned 2024 AI opinion poll",
          "text": "CLTR identifies Public First UK as its pollster for 2,011 UK adults surveyed 28 October–5 November 2024. Contract and fee not obtained. Distinct from US Public First Action.",
          "edge": "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll"
        },
        {
          "title": "Proposed government AI institutions",
          "text": "Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. Submission, not enactment or proof of government adoption.",
          "edge": "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.",
      "alternative": "Commitments are not receipts. Proposed public offices are not operating authorities. Similar mechanisms do not prove a shared chain of command.",
      "test": "Inspect the supporting records, then compare the terms, decision rights and dated outcomes.",
      "recourse": "Commitments are not receipts. Proposed public offices are not operating authorities. Similar mechanisms do not prove a shared chain of command."
    },
    {
      "id": "controlai-us-lobbying",
      "number": "56",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "ControlAI’s US lobbying operation",
      "dek": "Reported spending, professional roles and the UK-US disclosure link show the machinery behind congressional advocacy.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "controlaius",
      "edges": [
        "w38-e-q1-expenses",
        "w38-e-q2-expenses",
        "w38-e-congress-lobbying",
        "w38-e-max-lobbyist",
        "w38-e-leahy-lobbyist",
        "w38-e-morrison-client",
        "w38-e-sfr-foreign-interest"
      ],
      "claim": "Reported spending, professional roles and the UK-US disclosure link show the machinery behind congressional advocacy.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Reports USD120,000 lobbying expenses",
          "text": "Control AI US reports USD120,000 for Q1 2026 under Method A. The figure is a rounded expense estimate, not a donation to a politician.",
          "edge": "w38-e-q1-expenses"
        },
        {
          "title": "Reports USD80,000 lobbying expenses",
          "text": "Control AI US reports USD80,000 for Q2 2026 under Method A. Keep the period separate from the July17 filing date.",
          "edge": "w38-e-q2-expenses"
        },
        {
          "title": "Reports lobbying on ASI and loss-of-control risks",
          "text": "Both quarterly reports name the Senate and House as lobbying audiences; neither identifies the officials contacted or attributes legislative wording.",
          "edge": "w38-e-congress-lobbying"
        },
        {
          "title": "Named lobbyist, Q1 and Q2 2026",
          "text": "The initial registration discloses prior congressional staff employment; both quarterly reports identify Hernandez-Zapata as a lobbyist.",
          "edge": "w38-e-max-lobbyist"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Reported spending, professional roles and the UK-US disclosure link show the machinery behind congressional advocacy.",
      "alternative": "Follow the specific legal, financial or professional relationship rather than treating the neighbourhood as one organization.",
      "test": "The next revealing records are the actual contracts, appointments, implementation rules and amendments.",
      "recourse": "Use the source records to inspect the applicable decision and its stage."
    },
    {
      "id": "california-ai-auditor-laws",
      "number": "57",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "California: who qualifies the AI auditors?",
      "dek": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "w9-assure-sb813",
      "edges": [
        "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops",
        "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary",
        "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees",
        "w38-e-ab-registry",
        "w38-e-govops-registry",
        "w38-e-accountancy-route",
        "w38-e-openai-sb",
        "w38-e-openai-ab",
        "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo"
      ],
      "claim": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Enacts verifier-designation duties",
          "text": "SB813 assigns GovOps the development of qualification, suspension and termination criteria. Rules are due on or before January1,2028.",
          "edge": "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops"
        },
        {
          "title": "Preserves ability to operate without this audit route",
          "text": "Section8898.4 does not require engagement of an IVO or a covered audit as a condition of developing, deploying or operating an AI system.",
          "edge": "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary"
        },
        {
          "title": "May pay market rates; outcome-contingent fees barred",
          "text": "The enacted criteria allow the assessed party to pay an IVO at reasonable market rates while requiring independence and forbidding fees contingent on the assessment result.",
          "edge": "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees"
        },
        {
          "title": "Requires registry by January2029",
          "text": "AB1405 requires GovOps to create an online AI-auditor registry and set annual fees no higher than reasonable administration costs.",
          "edge": "w38-e-ab-registry"
        }
      ],
      "why": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
      "alternative": "Follow the specific legal, financial or professional relationship rather than treating the neighbourhood as one organization.",
      "test": "The next revealing records are the actual contracts, appointments, implementation rules and amendments.",
      "recourse": "Use the source records to inspect the applicable decision and its stage."
    },
    {
      "id": "basi-funding-and-access",
      "number": "58",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "BASI: money, research and lab access",
      "dek": "Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "w37-marc-andreessen",
      "edges": [
        "w37-marc-e-role",
        "w39-e-grant",
        "w39-e-reported-personal-grant",
        "w39-e-reported-contracts",
        "w39-e-pliny-bt6",
        "w39-e-john-bt6",
        "w39-e-pliny-community",
        "w39-e-john-lysios",
        "w39-e-operator-credit",
        "w39-e-deep-credit"
      ],
      "claim": "Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Cofounded firm",
          "text": "The firm identifies Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as its founders in 2009.",
          "edge": "w37-marc-e-role"
        },
        {
          "title": "Announces Open Source AI Grant",
          "text": "The June26,2025 cohort announcement names Pliny. The program describes grants rather than investments; recipient-specific value is undisclosed.",
          "edge": "w39-e-grant"
        },
        {
          "title": "Reported unrestricted grant",
          "text": "TIME reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. This may describe the a16z cohort award already mapped; it is not counted as a second transfer.",
          "edge": "w39-e-reported-personal-grant"
        },
        {
          "title": "Reported short-term research contracts",
          "text": "TIME reports short-term OpenAI contracts with Pliny. Contract values, terms and timing were not obtained.",
          "edge": "w39-e-reported-contracts"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.",
      "alternative": "Shared participation can coexist with different clients, incentives and publication rules.",
      "test": "Grant terms, named project credits and disclosure agreements would clarify the obligations.",
      "recourse": "Open each connection to read its public source and date."
    },
    {
      "id": "bt6-public-research",
      "number": "59",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "BT6: people, projects and professional work",
      "dek": "The collective’s public roster connects to tools, publications, a bug-bounty program and a vendor challenge.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "w39-bt6",
      "edges": [
        "w39-e-pliny-bt6",
        "w39-e-john-bt6",
        "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster",
        "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster",
        "w39-e-w39-joey-melo-roster",
        "w39-e-dursey-hypergame",
        "w39-e-dursey-book",
        "w39-e-marco-0din",
        "w39-e-w39-pliny-venom",
        "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-venom",
        "w39-e-0din-venom",
        "w39-e-pangea-winner",
        "w39-e-sans-speaker",
        "w39-e-w39-libertas-publisher",
        "w39-e-w39-claritas-publisher"
      ],
      "claim": "The collective’s public roster connects to tools, publications, a bug-bounty program and a vendor challenge.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Publicly described as a leader",
          "text": "The Latent Space interview introduces Pliny and John V as leaders of BT6.",
          "edge": "w39-e-pliny-bt6"
        },
        {
          "title": "Publicly described as a leader",
          "text": "John V appears alongside Pliny in the BT6 interview and publishes an operator list.",
          "edge": "w39-e-john-bt6"
        },
        {
          "title": "Listed as BT6 operator",
          "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Philip A. Dursey.",
          "edge": "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster"
        },
        {
          "title": "Listed as BT6 operator",
          "text": "John V’s September12,2025 public roster lists Marco Figueroa.",
          "edge": "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster"
        }
      ],
      "why": "The collective’s public roster connects to tools, publications, a bug-bounty program and a vendor challenge.",
      "alternative": "Shared participation can coexist with different clients, incentives and publication rules.",
      "test": "Grant terms, named project credits and disclosure agreements would clarify the obligations.",
      "recourse": "Open each connection to read its public source and date."
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-public-ownership",
      "number": "60",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "AI ownership and board power — proposals",
      "dek": "Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "w40-elsayed",
      "edges": [
        "w40-e-launch",
        "w40-e-board-proposal",
        "w40-e-testing-proposal",
        "w40-e-supports-wealth",
        "w40-e-announces-wealth",
        "w40-e-establish-fund",
        "w40-e-establish-commission",
        "w40-e-manage-vote",
        "w40-e-fund-operations"
      ],
      "claim": "Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Publishes campaign platform",
          "text": "The campaign released AI Under Democracy on June29,2026.",
          "edge": "w40-e-launch"
        },
        {
          "title": "Would require majority public seats",
          "text": "Proposed board rule: 50%+1 of seats publicly appointed or elected.",
          "edge": "w40-e-board-proposal"
        },
        {
          "title": "Would create independent testing agency",
          "text": "The platform calls for predeployment evaluation outside the developer.",
          "edge": "w40-e-testing-proposal"
        },
        {
          "title": "Publicly supports Sanders proposal",
          "text": "El-Sayed’s platform explicitly supports Sanders’s public-ownership proposal.",
          "edge": "w40-e-supports-wealth"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.",
      "alternative": "Public ownership, board selection and outside evaluation distribute different powers.",
      "test": "An introduced bill number, amendments and precise appointment rules would clarify the route to implementation.",
      "recourse": "Read the platform and draft clauses; follow formal legislative changes."
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-evaluator-network",
      "number": "61",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "METR: funding, access and policy",
      "dek": "Follow grants, lab access, people and public-sector work around the evaluator.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "w34-sanders-metr",
      "edges": [
        "w41-e-cotra-coefficient",
        "w41-e-benton-anthropic",
        "w41-e-benton-metr",
        "w41-e-benton-uk",
        "w41-e-arc-spinoff",
        "w41-e-audacious-canary",
        "w41-e-canary-metr",
        "w41-e-rand-canary",
        "w41-e-gates-audacious",
        "w41-e-commitments",
        "w41-e-schmidt",
        "w41-e-packard",
        "w41-e-longview",
        "w41-e-uk-support",
        "w41-e-eu-contract",
        "w41-e-lab-access",
        "w41-e-rsp-origin",
        "w41-e-rand-open",
        "w34-sanders-adv-e-014"
      ],
      "claim": "Follow grants, lab access, people and public-sector work around the evaluator.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Former programme and strategy roles",
          "text": "Technical AI safety leadership in 2024; AI giving strategy in 2025.",
          "edge": "w41-e-cotra-coefficient"
        },
        {
          "title": "Former Scalable Oversight manager",
          "text": "Also led Anthropic Fellows research.",
          "edge": "w41-e-benton-anthropic"
        },
        {
          "title": "Plans to join",
          "text": "Biography says he will soon join; start unconfirmed.",
          "edge": "w41-e-benton-metr"
        },
        {
          "title": "Helped establish predecessor taskforce",
          "text": "Reports helping set up the UK Frontier AI Taskforce.",
          "edge": "w41-e-benton-uk"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Trace who contributes resources and where a judgment can become a decision.",
      "alternative": "Funding, access and legal authority are separate relationships.",
      "test": "Contracts, donor allocations and decision rules would reveal the operative obligations.",
      "recourse": "Open each relationship for sources and the stage of the arrangement."
    },
    {
      "id": "gates-anthropic-infrastructure",
      "number": "62",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Gates, Anthropic and public-service AI",
      "dek": "Follow the joint programme and its institutional connections.",
      "duration": "4 min",
      "node": "w41-gates",
      "edges": [
        "w41-e-gates-partner",
        "w41-e-anthropic-partner",
        "w41-e-idm-internal",
        "w41-e-idm-integration",
        "w41-e-ihme-integration",
        "w41-e-gates-audacious",
        "w41-e-audacious-canary",
        "w41-e-canary-metr",
        "w41-e-lab-access"
      ],
      "claim": "Follow the joint programme and its institutional connections.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Joint programme partner",
          "text": "Combined $200m package over four years. Programme total, not a Gates-to-Anthropic transfer.",
          "edge": "w41-e-gates-partner"
        },
        {
          "title": "Joint programme partner",
          "text": "Credits and technical support within the same package.",
          "edge": "w41-e-anthropic-partner"
        },
        {
          "title": "Plans forecasting integration",
          "text": "Claude integration for accessible disease forecasts.",
          "edge": "w41-e-idm-integration"
        },
        {
          "title": "Names health-data collaboration",
          "text": "Work involving Global Burden of Disease study.",
          "edge": "w41-e-ihme-integration"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Trace who contributes resources and where a judgment can become a decision.",
      "alternative": "The Audacious–Canary branch is a wider institutional connection; Gates’s specific contribution to Canary remains unidentified.",
      "test": "Contracts, donor allocations and decision rules would reveal the operative obligations.",
      "recourse": "Open each relationship for sources and the stage of the arrangement."
    },
    {
      "id": "pro-human-coalition",
      "number": "63",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "The Pro-Human coalition: declaration to assembly",
      "dek": "Follow endorsements, the March announcement and the advertised September event.",
      "duration": "3 min",
      "node": "w42-declaration",
      "edges": [
        "w42-e-release",
        "w42-e-bannon-endorses",
        "w42-e-controlai-endorses",
        "w42-e-miotti-endorses",
        "w42-e-leahy-endorses",
        "w42-e-winga-endorses",
        "w42-e-scheduled",
        "w42-e-builds-on",
        "w42-e-organizer",
        "w42-e-coxon-assembly",
        "w42-e-sanders-assembly",
        "w42-e-bannon-assembly",
        "w42-e-blackburn-assembly",
        "w42-e-bores-assembly"
      ],
      "claim": "A documented earlier declaration connects to a scheduled political convening.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Start with March",
          "text": "Open the dated coalition announcement.",
          "edge": "w42-e-release"
        },
        {
          "title": "Follow the platform",
          "text": "Read how the public event listing connects to the declaration.",
          "edge": "w42-e-builds-on"
        },
        {
          "title": "Inspect the changed account",
          "text": "Compare the reported withdrawal with the retained earlier claim and organizer website.",
          "edge": "w42-e-coxon-assembly"
        }
      ],
      "why": "See the organizing sequence behind the current attention.",
      "alternative": "Shared principles can coexist with different implementation preferences.",
      "test": "Compare the announced programme with attendance, speeches and any adopted commitments.",
      "recourse": "Open each relationship for its source and stage."
    },
    {
      "id": "uk-ai-oversight-proposal",
      "number": "64",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "Who could stop an AI launch?",
      "dek": "A UK committee proposes statutory oversight and compulsory model access.",
      "duration": "3 min",
      "node": "w43-ai-report",
      "edges": [
        "w43-ai-e-adopted",
        "w43-ai-e-published",
        "w43-ai-e-oversight",
        "w43-ai-e-aisi"
      ],
      "claim": "The report specifies proposed intervention rights; legislation would decide which rights become real.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Separate adoption from publication",
          "text": "The committee adopted the report on September 9 and published it on September 14; neither event passes legislation.",
          "edge": "w43-ai-e-published"
        },
        {
          "title": "Read the proposed intervention powers",
          "text": "Launch blocking or withdrawal would depend on an unacceptable human-rights risk. The oversight body would decide, informed by AISI advice.",
          "edge": "w43-ai-e-oversight"
        },
        {
          "title": "Inspect the access requirement",
          "text": "The report proposes compulsory AISI access and leaves room to combine functions.",
          "edge": "w43-ai-e-aisi"
        }
      ],
      "why": "See the institutional change requested behind a broad call for AI regulation.",
      "alternative": "The government could reject, narrow or combine the recommended functions.",
      "test": "Read the government response and any introduced bill, including appointments and appeal rights.",
      "recourse": "Each relationship opens the source paragraphs and proposal-stage limit."
    },
    {
      "id": "svangel-policy-access",
      "number": "65",
      "gate": "capability",
      "title": "What does a policy bridge actually connect?",
      "dek": "An appointment makes SV Angel’s policy-access service concrete.",
      "duration": "3 min",
      "node": "w44-net-blueprint",
      "edges": [
        "w44-net-e-appointment",
        "w44-net-e-initiative",
        "w44-net-e-leads"
      ],
      "claim": "The announcement documents organized access-seeking, not delegated government authority.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Identify the intermediary",
          "text": "The firm names a partner responsible for policy and communications.",
          "edge": "w44-net-e-appointment"
        },
        {
          "title": "Locate the initiative owner",
          "text": "Project Blueprint is launched inside SV Angel, not as a government body.",
          "edge": "w44-net-e-initiative"
        },
        {
          "title": "Read the actual mandate",
          "text": "Carney is assigned to connect portfolio founders with policymakers; outcomes remain unobserved.",
          "edge": "w44-net-e-leads"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Distinguish a commercial access service from public decision rights.",
      "alternative": "The initiative may lead only to dialogue, or officials may reject its proposals.",
      "test": "Trace actual meetings, submitted text and subsequent official decisions.",
      "recourse": "Each relationship exposes its source and the limit on what the record proves."
    },
    {
      "id": "ea-money-and-institutions",
      "number": "66",
      "gate": "capital",
      "title": "EA: money, media and new institutions",
      "dek": "Follow funding into recruitment, new organizations and research capacity.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "coefficient",
      "edges": [
        "w46-e-coefficient-80k",
        "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
        "w46-e-80k-tailwind",
        "w46-e-80k-nadeau",
        "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient",
        "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
        "w46-e-coefficient-redwood",
        "w46-e-coefficient-epoch",
        "w46-e-coefficient-egc",
        "w46-e-egc-ipc",
        "w46-e-egc-need",
        "w46-e-coefficient-need",
        "w46-e-svcf-need"
      ],
      "claim": "Philanthropy finances both new institutions and the channels that recruit people to create them.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Largest donor, disclosed by recipient",
          "text": "The September 17 podcast identifies Coefficient Giving as 80,000 Hours' largest donor; the host says Max Nadeau's team has not directly funded it.",
          "edge": "w46-e-coefficient-80k"
        },
        {
          "title": "Launches nonprofit-founder initiative",
          "text": "Coefficient launches Project Tailwind to find and finance founders of ambitious AI-safety initiatives.",
          "edge": "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind"
        },
        {
          "title": "Promotes founder funding in podcast",
          "text": "The September 17 episode presents Coefficient's funding opportunities to prospective founders and discusses Tailwind.",
          "edge": "w46-e-80k-tailwind"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Identify the people, money and decision rights that make institutional influence possible.",
      "alternative": "Funding and recruitment can build capacity without producing the policy outcomes donors seek.",
      "test": "Trace subsequent grants, funded outputs and official decisions.",
      "recourse": "Open each connection for its primary source."
    },
    {
      "id": "ea-funds-and-lightcone",
      "number": "67",
      "gate": "capital",
      "title": "The EA fund split and Lightcone Commons",
      "dek": "Follow the closing LTFF into Commons and the new Transformative AI Fund.",
      "duration": "5 min",
      "node": "w46-commons",
      "edges": [
        "w46-e-tallinn-commons",
        "w46-e-moskovitz-commons",
        "w46-e-arm-commons",
        "w46-e-commons-operator",
        "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons",
        "w46-e-soares-commons",
        "w46-e-habryka-commons",
        "w46-e-habryka-lightcone",
        "w46-e-parikh-commons",
        "w46-e-parikh-arm",
        "w46-e-parikh-ltff",
        "w46-e-habryka-ltff",
        "w46-e-ltff-commons",
        "w46-e-ltff-taif",
        "w46-e-cea-taif",
        "w46-e-lundin-taif",
        "w46-e-parikh-taif"
      ],
      "claim": "The LTFF transition changes institutional homes while retaining several personal and funding connections.",
      "claimStatus": "interpretation",
      "steps": [
        {
          "title": "Planned spend-down channel; fees waived",
          "text": "LTFF plans to distribute up to three quarters of its remaining balance, approximately $2.8 million, to existing applications and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons. LTFF managers retain final allocation decisions.",
          "edge": "w46-e-ltff-commons"
        },
        {
          "title": "Announced ~$0.9m seed allocation",
          "text": "LTFF announces approximately one quarter of its remaining balance as a seed grant for the new fund.",
          "edge": "w46-e-ltff-taif"
        },
        {
          "title": "Fund adviser",
          "text": "The fund page lists Parikh as an adviser.",
          "edge": "w46-e-parikh-taif"
        }
      ],
      "why": "Identify the people, money and decision rights that make institutional influence possible.",
      "alternative": "Funding and recruitment can build capacity without producing the policy outcomes donors seek.",
      "test": "Trace subsequent grants, funded outputs and official decisions.",
      "recourse": "Open each connection for its primary source."
    }
  ],
  "archive": {
    "metadata": {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "title": "Red Threads public research database",
      "export_date": "2026-09-10",
      "research_through": "2026-09-09",
      "site_url": "https://red-threads-investigation.stunspot.chatgpt.site",
      "counts": {
        "entities": 1003,
        "relationships": 1577,
        "sources": 917,
        "notes": 172,
        "maps": 38,
        "stories": 7,
        "questions": 192,
        "hypotheses": 5,
        "decision_models": 1
      },
      "scope": "The published research collection. Later unpublished intake notes and original third-party documents are not bundled.",
      "input_hashes": {
        "lib/full-profiles.json": "940917ab1af9ca0d2d1c02eff47dcb69d09c3f2588ae0a27ca043bc5496c0b32",
        "lib/full-connections.json": "5dcabd5e93d77e53f211cb66b68ad411e67b05483b0d055ed6a4b86fcd2e690b",
        "lib/source-catalog.json": "99585f65d9a9fb82279bdab754f2a4865496790c93e8e2275479d42bcc1d5f0a",
        "lib/research-notes.json": "7137d23aba83c19d912d043aa32858e5a22fa812874da466b49c38f791cd3067",
        "lib/guided-maps.json": "e8a12024d8ef8b33d2b96abe3290423e20437e170e63e863483b02f5ccfc493d",
        "lib/stories.json": "7d8f08fc7aac67afb57028ad29c3cedf9340c73f86836eb962c5f2e4270a74cf",
        "lib/research-questions.json": "27068d38284af509865dc80a1649c89a55dfe5353e5335473a7b92510ed501a1",
        "lib/research-hypotheses.json": "0ea775903a97441289a75fdf3cbd5fb45a70cb3fab79141b6cc2ac012107a71d",
        "lib/valve-decision.json": "072eb2256b503b9d66bac2bfaa338f99967d93a67c0b41feaba498bf84d5eba6",
        "public/data/network.json": "2056f4972e14ae5ed271da77a41f9da0841abc8da254366a96c65c648d9c3709"
      }
    },
    "entity_aliases": {
      "digital-duty-of-care": "w10-duty-draft2026"
    },
    "stories": [
      {
        "slug": "the-big-picture",
        "title": "Who gets to operate the switches?",
        "deck": "Governments, funders, campaigners and companies exchange different kinds of power. The consequential moment is when someone turns another institution’s input into a decision.",
        "area": "The big picture",
        "people": [
          "goodventures",
          "controlai",
          "oak",
          "ofcom",
          "mastercard",
          "stripe"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Money pays for capacity. Someone still chooses.",
            "text": [
              "A donor can make research, campaigning or a legal challenge possible. An adviser can select the opportunities a donor sees. A campaign can supply a proposal. A regulator can adopt, narrow or reject it. A platform can then decide how to put a rule into practice. Following these decisions is more revealing than counting people who know one another.",
              "Good Ventures and its philanthropic adviser illustrate different allocation roles. Oak illustrates why a financial connection is not a complete political explanation: its grantees include both safety advocates and civil-liberties organisations resisting broad surveillance."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The rules and the machinery belong to different hands.",
            "text": [
              "Public authorities can impose legal duties. Companies operate payments, accounts and distribution. Advocacy organisations supply proposals and classifications. Their interests can align in one dispute and collide in another. These are overlapping coalitions with different resources, rather than permanent teams.",
              "Mastercard’s merchant-list rules permit onboarding after inquiry; Stripe’s published practice is generally disqualifying, with possible exceptions. The practical result depends on the recipient’s decision as well as the upstream rule."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Government can steer—and constrain—private power.",
            "text": [
              "Ofcom’s decisions provide specific examples of selective uptake: a Full Fact contribution helped change a notice indicator; a Check My Ads request did not secure specific monetisation recommendations in one measure. In another domain, the CFPB required Block to provide notices and decide customer appeals within ten business days.",
              "Our interpretation is that power often accumulates across these interfaces. Proving a particular restriction still requires its own chain: who requested it, who had authority, who acted and what happened. A shared donor or compatible objective is a starting point for that work."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              },
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The most revealing gap is often the return journey.",
            "text": [
              "An adverse assessment can travel through a network quickly. What happens when it is corrected? Does the correction reach the buyer, the platform or the exported copy? Does someone reopen the decision? Does access return?",
              "A published appeal process, a software deletion mechanism and an actual restored account answer different questions. The missing evidence is often an ordinary case file or instruction trail that shows those events together."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
                "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
              },
              {
                "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
                "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
              },
              {
                "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
              },
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "slug": "money-behind-ai-advocacy",
        "title": "Who funds the AI debate?",
        "deck": "Large grants, creator programmes and policy campaigns are visible. Their arrangements differ in how much control they give a sponsor.",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "people": [
          "goodventures",
          "cais",
          "fli",
          "lightcone",
          "vitalik",
          "tegmark",
          "controlai",
          "frame",
          "miotti",
          "behrens",
          "winga"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A grant is a resource with a purpose.",
            "text": [
              "FLI’s 2025 audited accounts report $45,197,838 in grants from Lightcone Foundation. That establishes scale. It does not tell us how much was spent on public persuasion or who approved a specific video. Asset transfers between related bodies also cannot be counted as independent donations each time they move."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
                "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
                "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Creator support comes in different forms.",
            "text": [
              "People First’s published influencer terms include approval, revisions and conditional payment. Frame describes an independent creator track alongside work to institutional briefs, and denies funder control over content or selection. A creator acknowledged FLI, Frame and BlueDot support while asserting editorial independence.",
              "ControlAI and Rational Animations publicly acknowledged a partnership; its fee and agreement were not obtained. The sponsor behind Sabine Hossenfelder’s original account remains unidentified. These are different arrangements, not interchangeable evidence of script control."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
                "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
              },
              {
                "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
                "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
              },
              {
                "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
                "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
              },
              {
                "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
              },
              {
                "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
                "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Selection can influence the conversation.",
            "text": [
              "Funding people who already share a concern can expand that concern’s reach without anyone rewriting a script. This is an interpretation of how selection works; identifying control over an individual output requires its actual agreement and approval history.",
              "ControlAI’s UK company articles put formal authority in its directors. Public filings help answer who can manage the organisation, while leaving major donor conditions unresolved."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
                "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
                "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A campaign has a production chain.",
            "text": [
              "The Global Call for AI Red Lines names CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI as organisers, with ControlAI and FLI among partners providing feedback. Evan Hubinger is listed as a signatory. Those are specific roles in a shared campaign.",
              "The Call is different from A Narrow Path. A signature on one does not endorse every proposal in the other, and a proposed oversight institution is not an operating government body."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
              },
              {
                "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
                "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
              },
              {
                "title": "Global Call individual signatories",
                "url": "https://red-lines.ai/individuals"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "slug": "one-donor-different-agendas",
        "title": "One donor. Conflicting agendas.",
        "deck": "Oak Foundation funds both online-safety advocacy and organisations challenging surveillance. Follow the grants, then follow each recipient’s choices.",
        "area": "Safety & rights",
        "people": [
          "oak",
          "alan-parker",
          "5rights",
          "kidron",
          "weprotect",
          "w31-fa-statewatch",
          "w31-fa-dff",
          "w30-class-cma"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A common funding source is a real connection.",
            "text": [
              "Oak’s reports identify multiyear support for 5Rights, WeProtect, Check My Ads, Statewatch and Digital Freedom Fund. These awards give organisations capacity and deserve scrutiny on their own terms: amount, duration, purpose and decision rights."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The recipients disagree about the means.",
            "text": [
              "Statewatch endorsed objections to broad scanning and possible identity requirements in the EU child-abuse proposal in September 2023. WeProtect’s Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in an earlier version of that debate. The positions diverge, although they concern different versions and dates.",
              "That is useful evidence against explaining every recipient’s action through a single donor programme. Shared funding does not erase disagreement or tell us which organisation will prevail."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Money can sustain action that already exists.",
            "text": [
              "Digital Freedom Fund reports a June 2026 grant supporting Liberty’s challenge concerning the alleged Apple technical-capability notice. Liberty filed in March 2025. The dates support a role in sustaining litigation; they do not support a claim that this grant originated the filing.",
              "DFF also describes external peers taking part in selection. A donor’s grant, peer selection and the execution of an award are separate decisions. Actual terms and approval records would reveal more about where each party’s discretion begins and ends."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "WeProtect Secretariat consultation · pp2–4",
                "url": "https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WPGA-consultation-response-EC-regulations-FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
                "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Statewatch endorsement of EU CSA objection — September2023",
                "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2023/september/statement-to-eu-countries-do-not-agree-to-mass-surveillance-proposal-warn-ngos/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
                "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
                "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
              },
              {
                "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
                "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "slug": "from-safety-campaign-to-law",
        "title": "How a safety proposal becomes a rule",
        "deck": "The UK and Australia offer something stronger than a list of shared contacts: documents showing policy ideas entering official consideration—and changing along the way.",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "people": [
          "ofcom",
          "avpa",
          "esafety",
          "digital-duty-of-care",
          "w10-duty-reset-australia",
          "w30-class-cma"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Policy travels in documents.",
            "text": [
              "Carnegie-associated duty-of-care work, collaboration with Reset and citations in Australia’s statutory review connect a developed model to official consideration. Funding and commissioned work sustain parts of this policy infrastructure. Later funding, however, cannot be assigned authorship of an earlier idea."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
                "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "The Australian draft narrows one requested power.",
            "text": [
              "Reset sought vetted research access including third-sector organisations. The 8 September 2026 exposure draft instead specifies Australian-university employment and approval under prospective rules. That is a meaningful narrowing of eligibility.",
              "The proposed duty divides authority among a legislative framework, ministerial rules and eSafety. Its adult-consent provision limits what the duty requires; it does not create a universal adult veto. The text examined here does not establish universal identification."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
                "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie UK submission to Australian House Select Committee — January 2022",
                "url": "https://www1.essex.ac.uk/documents/research/carnegie/Submission-to-the-House-Select-Committee-on-Social-Media-and-Online-Safety.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
                "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
                "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
                "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
                "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Age assurance is a method question as well as a power question.",
            "text": [
              "Ofcom’s acceptance of email-based age estimation followed technical evidence, including AVPA input. Accepting a method does not certify a vendor or award a procurement contract. Who supplies evidence, who chooses the threshold and who sells a service are distinct roles."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "A regulator can take one recommendation and leave another.",
            "text": [
              "Ofcom attributes a crisis notice-indicator change to Full Fact’s submission and earlier meeting questions. It also considered Check My Ads’ crisis-revenue request without recommending specific monetisation practices in that measure.",
              "These decisions show influence and limits at the same time. They are a firmer basis for analysis than assuming either that consultation means control or that formal regulatory independence means nobody influenced the outcome."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
              },
              {
                "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
              },
              {
                "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
                "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "slug": "payments-and-blacklists",
        "title": "When a classification reaches your wallet",
        "deck": "A risk list, a payment-network rule and a processor’s decision can each contribute to a restriction. They are different steps, often controlled by different institutions.",
        "area": "Payments & platforms",
        "people": [
          "mastercard",
          "stripe",
          "itch-io",
          "collective-shout",
          "w32-gdi-gdi",
          "w22-sig-lantern",
          "w22-sig-cashapp"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The recipient can tighten the rule.",
            "text": [
              "Mastercard’s August 2026 MATCH rules require inquiry into listed merchants but permit onboarding. Stripe publishes a generally disqualifying practice with possible exceptions. A merchant can therefore face a restriction that depends on the processor’s own decision as well as the existence of a network record."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
                "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
              },
              {
                "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
                "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
              },
              {
                "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
                "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
                "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Information-sharing can prompt separate action.",
            "text": [
              "A Lantern transparency case study reports Meta signals followed by investigations and action at Cash App and Xbox. The underlying case files were not inspected, so these remain operator-reported outcomes. The sequence does not establish that Lantern caused Steam removals.",
              "The useful question is what the receiving company did with the information, under which rules, and whether it would revisit the decision if the information changed."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
                "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Historical distribution is not necessarily current distribution.",
            "text": [
              "GDI’s risk information had a documented route into Oracle advertising tools, but the relevant Oracle service ended in September 2024. IAS later said it discontinued limited past GDI inputs. Drawing either relationship as an uninterrupted current route would mislead readers.",
              "A review process might change a GDI assessment without automatically restoring every advertising relationship. The customer’s receipt of the correction and subsequent decision remain separate facts to establish."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
                "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
              },
              {
                "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
                "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
                "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "There are constraints on the companies too.",
            "text": [
              "The January 2025 CFPB order requires Block to provide specified restriction and appeal notices, decide appeals within ten business days and change status as appropriate. That narrows corporate discretion. It does not prove that every claimant recovered an account or received money."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
                "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
                "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
              },
              {
                "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
                "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
                "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "slug": "the-access-test",
        "title": "A positive audit. Nobody approved.",
        "deck": "An AliExpress audit reported readiness for public-data access while recording no approved applications. What does that result actually establish?",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "people": [
          "european-commission",
          "w32-gdi-gdi"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "Separate the routes to access.",
            "text": [
              "The Digital Services Act provides different mechanisms for project-specific vetted research access, access to public data and priority handling of trusted-flagger notices. These routes have different conditions and consequences. Funding for research does not itself confer access to a platform."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "Directive2019/790 — incorporated research-organisation definition",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
              },
              {
                "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
                "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Payment and approval belong to different parties.",
            "text": [
              "Under AliExpress’s June 2025 commitments, the company nominates and pays a monitoring trustee, while the Commission approves and supervises the role. The payment relationship does not transfer the Commission’s approval power to the company."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
              },
              {
                "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
                "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Read the result behind the opinion.",
            "text": [
              "The FTI audit for the year ending June 2025 gave a positive opinion on the public-data access provision while reporting no approved applications. It said the applications examined were incomplete or invalid. This supports a narrower claim about assessed readiness, rather than proof that useful access was delivered.",
              "Legitimate rejection of deficient applications and an unnecessarily difficult access process are both possible explanations. Application files, responses, opportunities to remedy defects and actual delivery would distinguish them."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
                "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Trackers help, but do not decide the dispute.",
            "text": [
              "The DSA40 Collaboratory collects voluntary application reports and supports researchers. Its September 2026 tracker contained inconsistent totals, and a public AliExpress entry lacked enough identifying detail to join it to the audit cohort.",
              "An applicant’s complaint is a lead to investigate. A platform’s positive audit is a claim to examine. Neither substitutes for the paired application and response."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory — entry and support mission",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/"
              },
              {
                "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
                "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
                "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "slug": "who-builds-government-tools",
        "title": "Who gets paid to build the machinery?",
        "deck": "Public procurement connects policy ambitions with consultants, prototypes and evaluation. A budget announcement is only the beginning of that story.",
        "area": "Rules & government",
        "people": [
          "ofcom"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "A price, a budget and a payment are different facts.",
            "text": [
              "The Counter Disinformation Data Project’s Oliver Wyman evaluation commission disclosed a £656,000 price excluding VAT, evaluation criteria and a Treasury-linked feasibility gate. The £8.4 million programme allocation was a separate budget figure. Adding these together as separate expenditure would double-count parts of the same programme.",
              "The acquired documents establish commissioning and conditions. They do not establish cash paid, the final evaluation or whether the funding gate was exercised."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
              },
              {
                "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Advisers, suppliers and evaluators play different roles.",
            "text": [
              "The Online Safety Data Initiative involved a CDEI-convened advisory group, suppliers including Faculty and PUBLIC, and PA Consulting programme evaluation. PUBLIC described a prototype sandbox for assessing classifiers. Its later work explicitly credited reuse of OSDI practices.",
              "These records connect people, programmes and methods. They do not establish that a prototype became a production system or identify every redacted subcontractor."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "title": "Find the decision after the deliverable.",
            "text": [
              "The most revealing next document would be an acceptance decision paired with the actual evaluation: what was tested, what failed, what changed and whether funding or deployment followed. A commissioned report and an effective government capability are different outcomes."
            ],
            "sources": [
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
                "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
              },
              {
                "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI official programme description",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/about-us/"
              },
              {
                "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
                "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
                "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
                "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
              },
              {
                "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
                "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "notes": [
      {
        "id": "campaign-summary",
        "title": "Current campaign summary",
        "description": "Consolidated 9 September 2026. Start with Where influence becomes a decision(CURRENT-SYNTHESIS.md), then inspect the claim and evidence index(consolidation-wave-2026-09-09/synthesis/claim-index.md). The current visual/portable edition is Red Threads r33(portable-explorer-r33-2026-09-09/index.html).",
        "html": "<p>Consolidated 9 September 2026. Start with <a href=\"/research/current-synthesis\">Where influence becomes a decision</a>, then inspect the <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index\">claim and evidence index</a>. The current visual/portable edition is <a>Red Threads r33</a>.</p>\n<p>We have identified specific financial, governance, campaign, policy and operational relationships. The strongest organising question is how an assessment becomes a condition of participation: who supplies it, who acts on it, which institution retains discretion, and who can reverse the result. Funding, selection, classification, action and remedy recur across the AI, online-safety, identity, advertising, payments and research-access branches, with different instruments in each.</p>\n<p>The evidence supports substantial organised resources for AI advocacy, specific creator production/selection mechanisms, identifiable policy transmission, and consequential classification and access systems. It also shows divergent positions among recipients of common funding, declined or narrowed proposals, terminated distribution relationships and actual constraints on recipient discretion. These observations strengthen a distributed institutional account while leaving a common cross-sector controller unestablished.</p>\n<p>The consolidation integrates six accepted packets previously outside the graph: CDDP evaluation, OSDI/PUBLIC, EU researcher-access rules, AliExpress commitments, audit/trustee evidence and voluntary application outcomes. It also brings the seven r32 GDI/rights packets into the current visuals. The dated public ThreatExchange correction review and stablecoin check remain clearly identified supplements.</p>\n<p>The most consequential remaining gaps are specific instruments and outcomes: signed grant conditions and exercised approvals; actual evaluation/acceptance and funding decisions; a classification correction received and acted on by a customer; a real application paired with its response and usable access; an appeal linked to a corrected practical result. The inquiry has not established the broader Fabian/WEF/owner-bank/medical-data instruction chain suggested earlier.</p>\n<p>This is a consolidation of retained research through 9 September 2026, not a new external investigation or a fresh audit of every original. Source records retain their reading scopes and attribution; counts are not independent corroboration. Original reports and earlier revisions remain historical snapshots. Construction and verification status are recorded in <a>current work</a>; the earlier summary is preserved in the consolidation folder.</p>",
        "path": "campaign-summary.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "Consolidated 9 September 2026. Start with [Where influence becomes a decision](current-synthesis.md), then inspect the [claim and evidence index](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md). The current visual/portable edition is Red Threads r33.\n\nWe have identified specific financial, governance, campaign, policy and operational relationships. The strongest organising question is how an assessment becomes a condition of participation: who supplies it, who acts on it, which institution retains discretion, and who can reverse the result. Funding, selection, classification, action and remedy recur across the AI, online-safety, identity, advertising, payments and research-access branches, with different instruments in each.\n\nThe evidence supports substantial organised resources for AI advocacy, specific creator production/selection mechanisms, identifiable policy transmission, and consequential classification and access systems. It also shows divergent positions among recipients of common funding, declined or narrowed proposals, terminated distribution relationships and actual constraints on recipient discretion. These observations strengthen a distributed institutional account while leaving a common cross-sector controller unestablished.\n\nThe consolidation integrates six accepted packets previously outside the graph: CDDP evaluation, OSDI/PUBLIC, EU researcher-access rules, AliExpress commitments, audit/trustee evidence and voluntary application outcomes. It also brings the seven r32 GDI/rights packets into the current visuals. The dated public ThreatExchange correction review and stablecoin check remain clearly identified supplements.\n\nThe most consequential remaining gaps are specific instruments and outcomes: signed grant conditions and exercised approvals; actual evaluation/acceptance and funding decisions; a classification correction received and acted on by a customer; a real application paired with its response and usable access; an appeal linked to a corrected practical result. The inquiry has not established the broader Fabian/WEF/owner-bank/medical-data instruction chain suggested earlier.\n\nThis is a consolidation of retained research through 9 September 2026, not a new external investigation or a fresh audit of every original. Source records retain their reading scopes and attribution; counts are not independent corroboration. Original reports and earlier revisions remain historical snapshots. Construction and verification status are recorded in current work; the earlier summary is preserved in the consolidation folder.\n",
        "file": "research/campaign-summary.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "current-synthesis",
        "title": "Where influence becomes a decision",
        "description": "Consolidated account of research through 9 September 2026. This account accompanies r33 and two explicitly identified supplements. It is an interpretation of the research record, not a fresh audit of every original or a claim that the institutions below share one controller.",
        "html": "<p>Consolidated account of retained research through <strong>9 September 2026</strong>. This account accompanies r33 and two explicitly identified supplements. It is an interpretation of the acquired record, not a fresh audit of every original or a claim that the institutions below share one controller.</p>\n<p>The investigation has moved beyond a list of people who know one another. We can identify recurring ways in which resources become influence: financing particular work, selecting the people who perform it, defining qualifying categories, supplying assessments, and attaching practical consequences to those assessments. An advertisement, a payment relationship, a platform account or access to research data can depend on decisions made across several institutions.</p>\n<p>The most useful unit is <strong>the handoff</strong>. Who supplied an assessment? Under which agreement, rule or duty did someone else act on it? Who retained discretion? What actually happened? Who could reverse it? The record contains real financial and policy connections, along with shared methods and analogous structures. Those are different kinds of connection, and the coherent account depends on keeping them distinct.</p>\n<p>Our strongest overall interpretation is that practical power is often distributed across these decision points. A central command is unnecessary for a restrictive result: independently motivated institutions can combine to produce it. That is an explanatory possibility supported by several bounded examples, not proof that every restriction arose this way. Common funders also support divergent positions, regulators decline proposals, distributors exit relationships, and courts or regulators impose remedies. Those observations constrain the stronger theory of a unified programme.</p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"ai-advocacy-capacity-selection-and-editorial-authority\">AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority</h2>\n<p>The original question remains important. The retained record shows substantial organised resources behind AI advocacy and several concrete routes into creator production. FLI&#x27;s 2025 standalone audit reports <strong>US$45,197,838 in grants from Lightcone Foundation</strong>. Earlier transfers involving Lightcone Foundation and Future of Life Europe concern assets and organisational allocation; they cannot be added together as annual persuasion expenditure. Lightcone Foundation is also a different entity from Lightcone Infrastructure. Scale is real, but the accounting categories matter. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a1\">A1</a></p>\n<p>Creator influence is not one arrangement. People First&#x27;s published terms provide for approval, revisions, compliance and conditional payment; an individual campaign statement of work was not acquired. Frame describes an independent creator track and an institutional-brief track, names funding sources, and denies funder control over content or selection. A Future Tense creator publicly acknowledged support from FLI, Frame and BlueDot while asserting editorial independence. Rational Animations and ControlAI acknowledged a partnership, but the fee and agreement remain unacquired. The sponsor behind the initial Sabine Hossenfelder account remains unidentified. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a2\">A2</a></p>\n<p>Selection can affect public communication without script approval. Supporting people who already share a concern can increase that concern&#x27;s reach. That inference requires less than editorial command, but it still cannot identify an undisclosed payment or instruction. ControlAI&#x27;s acquired UK articles locate formal management and membership authority in its directors. A small related-organisation payable in its US return does not name the counterparty and cannot complete an assumed UK–US funding chain. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a3\">A3</a></p>\n<p>The Global Call for AI Red Lines supplies a documented campaign-production chain: drafting, management, partner feedback and signatory work have named roles. CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI are organisers; ControlAI and FLI provided partner feedback. The Call is distinct from ControlAI&#x27;s <strong>A Narrow Path</strong>. Evan Hubinger&#x27;s signature does not assign him every proposal advanced by another participant. Advocacy and summit access also remain separate from government adoption. This branch supplies real coordination, with a bounded object and purpose. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a4\">A4</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"shared-resources-do-not-settle-the-policy-position\">Shared resources do not settle the policy position</h2>\n<p>Oak&#x27;s grants make an instructive comparison. Its published 2025 awards include three-year support to Check My Ads, Digital Freedom Fund and Statewatch. Statewatch endorsed objections to broad scanning and possible identity requirements in the EU child-abuse proposal; the WeProtect Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in a different, earlier version of that debate. The comparison is evidence of divergent interventions, not a same-draft controlled experiment.</p>\n<p>DFF reports support for Liberty&#x27;s challenge concerning the alleged Apple technical-capability notice. Liberty filed in March 2025, before the reported June 2026 grant. Funding could sustain existing litigation; it did not originate that filing. Acquired procedural results also do not determine the merits. A common donor is therefore an important financial connection, but not a sufficient explanation of every recipient&#x27;s choices. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a5\">A5</a></p>\n<p>DFF&#x27;s selection reforms further separate donor resources, project selection and award execution. Public descriptions assign project selection to external peers and information/facilitation roles to staff, with confidentiality and conflict commitments. They do not reveal every operative recusal, signature or payment decision. The question “who chooses?” needs an answer at each stage. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a6\">A6</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"policy-travels-through-documents-and-decisions\">Policy travels through documents and decisions</h2>\n<p>The UK–Australia duty-of-care lane supplies stronger transmission evidence than a shared-event roster. Carnegie-associated work, collaboration with Reset and citations in Australia&#x27;s statutory review connect a developed model to official consideration. Commissioned research and programme funding sustained parts of that policy infrastructure; later funding cannot be assigned authorship of an earlier idea.</p>\n<p>The Australian exposure draft dated 8 September 2026 would allocate consequential discretion among Parliament&#x27;s framework, ministerial rules and eSafety. It remains a proposal. Reset requested access for academic and third-sector researchers; the acquired draft instead requires employment by an Australian university and approval under prospective rules. That is a meaningful narrowing, not an awarded NGO entitlement. The private adult-consent provision limits what the duty requires; it does not create a universal adult veto. Nothing inspected establishes universal identification. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a7\">A7</a></p>\n<p>The UK record also distinguishes required outcomes from particular identity suppliers. Ofcom recognises different age-assurance methods and accepted email-based estimation after supplied evidence; that was a methodological choice, not vendor certification or procurement. Check My Ads later sought customer/identity checks for monetising creators and advertisers and pre-monetisation clearance where risk indicators appear. Those proposals could affect pseudonymity and income, but do not concern every ordinary viewer. Ofcom expressly considered its crisis-revenue request and did not recommend specific monetisation practices in that measure. Other recommendations retain their own unresolved dispositions. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a8\">A8</a></p>\n<p>Full Fact offers unusually precise evidence of input and institutional response. Ofcom attributes a notice-indicator amendment to its submission and questions from an earlier DSIT meeting. A notice becomes an indicator to consider; the provider retains its criteria-based crisis determination. The record supports a specific contribution while leaving the meeting&#x27;s underlying records and other decisions unacquired. Influence is visible without assuming wholesale control. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a8\">A8</a></p>\n<p>The newly integrated procurement evidence makes the same distinction financially concrete. CDDP&#x27;s Oliver Wyman evaluation commission has a disclosed <strong>£656,000 price excluding VAT</strong>, proposed criteria and a Treasury-linked feasibility gate. These establish commissioning and conditions, not payment, the final evaluation or an exercised funding decision. The announced <strong>£8.4 million programme allocation</strong> cannot be added to supplier prices as separate expenditure. Redactions and inconsistent contract dates remain unresolved. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a23\">A23</a></p>\n<p>OSDI had a CDEI-convened advisory group, PA Consulting programme evaluation and supplier participation by Faculty and PUBLIC. These are distinct roles. PUBLIC&#x27;s account of a TRL4 sandbox describes prototype work; its later STCF2 assessment explicitly credits OSDI practices while retaining limited testing and supplier-reported performance. PUBLIC&#x27;s claim to have contributed to CDDP does not identify it in a redacted subcontract list. Its current website-controller legal identity is not proof of the historical contracting party. The record now connects programmes, methods and personnel more clearly while preserving the missing agreements and acceptance decisions. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a24\">A24</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a-classification-matters-because-someone-acts-on-it\">A classification matters because someone acts on it</h2>\n<p>The Lantern case study reports Meta sharing signals followed by separate investigations and action by Cash App and Xbox. The underlying case files were not inspected; the actions remain operator-reported. Programme rules include recourse, removal of no-longer-relevant information and administrator notification. Nothing in that case establishes that Lantern caused Steam removals. The live question is how information becomes a recipient decision, and what follows when the information changes. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a9\">A9</a></p>\n<p>Payment records make the recipient&#x27;s role especially clear. Mastercard&#x27;s retained August 2026 MATCH rules require inquiry but expressly permit onboarding a listed merchant. Stripe publishes a generally disqualifying practice with possible exceptions. The list and a restrictive underwriting decision are connected, but are not identical or a universal prohibition on banking. The 2025 eGumball appellate opinion applies FilmOn&#x27;s reasoning about audience, purpose and context to confidential commercial reporting: an actual judicial bridge between advertising classification and payment reporting. Its procedural decision does not adjudicate the underlying report&#x27;s truth or restore a merchant. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a11\">A11</a></p>\n<p>Other infrastructure gates allocate authority differently. Nominet&#x27;s documented IWF cooperation predates the 2021 UK Safer Internet Centre grant, weakening the claim that the grant created that relationship. PIPCU combines public funding and police assessment with private intelligence; its announced industry co-funding pilot starts in April 2027 and does not establish current contributor command. Operation Creative&#x27;s dated procedure allocates police tactical judgment, while advertising recipients choose how to implement information. Broader KYBC requests sought identification and consequences for commercial customers; requested reach across hosting and payments is not enacted universal user-ID law. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a13\">A13</a></p>\n<p>Advertising classification adds a question about scale: is the object a page, channel or whole domain? February 2025 Senate letters questioned financing a website even where advertisements avoided prohibited material. DoubleVerify subsequently announced default Highly Illicit and P2P Sharing and Streaming categories and later reported implementation. The chronology does not establish that the letters uniquely caused the change. NCMEC notifications, DV&#x27;s assessment and its later IWF relationship are different inputs. Announced defaults do not constitute our observation of customer settings, and general customer-choice language does not prove an override in every configuration. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a14\">A14</a></p>\n<p>Counterpressure belongs in this account. TAG reported no violations of the investigated brand-safety guidelines: its determination, not independent exoneration. DV&#x27;s complaint challenged critics&#x27; assertions: allegations, not judicial findings. Its disclosed fee model does not establish a bounty for blacklisting. The consequences can be significant without a proven private motive or a single upstream instruction.</p>\n<p>GDI illustrates why time matters. Its advertising-risk data had a documented Oracle distribution route, but Oracle&#x27;s relevant service ended in September 2024. IAS later said it discontinued limited past GDI inputs. Historical relationships cannot establish present delivery. A publisher-review procedure may revise GDI&#x27;s assessment, but the acquired record does not show automatic propagation to every buyer or an obligation to resume advertising. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a16\">A16</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"research-access-has-its-own-gatekeepers\">Research access has its own gatekeepers</h2>\n<p>GDI&#x27;s public funding and research work reveal further roles without completing an alleged government blacklist. FCDO described supervised activities outside the United States; the signed grant and commercial-reuse conditions remain unacquired. CORDIS identifies a German GDI entity and a <strong>€385,275 EU contribution</strong> to AI4TRUST, not the whole consortium budget or an assumed UK guarantee. Project documents show keywords and annotations, model-assisted triage and human review. A seed term is not a verdict; a research warning is not an advertising ban. GDI&#x27;s request for mandatory tool/API compatibility is a bid for an institutional role, not proof of its award. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a17\">A17</a></p>\n<p>The integrated EU access rules separate three mechanisms. Article 40(4) provides project-specific vetting and a reasoned request through the relevant Digital Services Coordinator. Article 40(12) concerns public-data access. Article 22 trusted-flagger priority concerns notices and is different again. Funding and independence disclosures can form part of eligibility; public overviews need not name every applicant or funder. Neither Horizon funding nor a failed exact-name search establishes whether GDI received platform access. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a18\">A18</a></p>\n<p>AliExpress&#x27;s June 2025 binding commitments supply concrete procedures and clocks. The company nominates and pays a monitoring trustee; the Commission approves and supervises the role. Paying the trustee does not confer the Commission&#x27;s approval power, and appointment does not establish delivery of a report. The substantive commitment term and external reporting schedule differ. A later illegal-product fine concerns a separate issue; it is not evidence of breach of the research-access commitments. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a19\">A19</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"assurance-is-not-the-same-evidence-as-a-delivered-result\">Assurance is not the same evidence as a delivered result</h2>\n<p>The retained FTI audit offers a useful stress test. It gives a positive Article 40(12) opinion while reporting <strong>no approved applications</strong> in the year ending June 2025. It says all examined applications were incomplete or invalid. The record supports a narrower conclusion about assessed readiness. It does not establish either that meaningful access was delivered or that requests were improperly refused. Its period also precedes the monitoring trustee&#x27;s appointment. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a20\">A20</a></p>\n<p>Two explanations remain possible: legitimate screening of deficient requests, or an interpretation/cure process that makes an access right difficult to use. Without application files, responses and actual delivery, the public audit cannot decide between them. Likewise, the first monitoring report and the Commission&#x27;s response were not acquired; absence from the acquired record is not proof of non-delivery.</p>\n<p>The researcher-side material is informative but not an adjudication. The DSA40 Collaboratory collects voluntary reports, assists applicants and advocates support for intermediaries. Its September 2026 tracker headline reports <strong>70 applications</strong>, while its retained table sums to <strong>68</strong>; other subtotals also differ. Its one open AliExpress entry lacks the identity and dates needed to connect it to GDI or the FTI cohort. Organisers&#x27; judgments that rejection reasons are invalid are leads, not acquired rulings. Disclosed project and host funding establish resources, not donor control of findings. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a21\">A21</a></p>\n<p>This is the same evidentiary problem seen in the procurement branch: an evaluator commissioned, a test described, a positive opinion, an accepted application and a useful result are distinct events. Counting one as another can make both success and obstruction appear more certain than the record permits.</p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"can-correction-travel-as-far-as-the-consequence\">Can correction travel as far as the consequence?</h2>\n<p>The retained public ThreatExchange client provides a substantive counterexample to technical permanence. At the inspected commit, deletion markers can remove local records; a stale-checkpoint path calls for clearing and a fresh fetch; opinion structures can represent disagreement. These are static capabilities in particular code paths, not a demonstrated end-to-end deployed execution trace. Lantern&#x27;s use of hosted ThreatExchange does not prove its participants use that client or version. No account restoration was observed. TCAP&#x27;s separately inspected hash interface also documents deletion and feedback; a historical Altitude importer is another interface and version. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a10\">A10</a></p>\n<p>There are also actual obligations constraining recipient discretion. The January 2025 CFPB order requires Block to provide specified restriction/appeal notices and to decide an appeal and change status as appropriate within ten business days. That does not guarantee every appellant restored access or constitute an admission of every finding. It does materially narrow the earlier remedy gap. Acquired July settlement terms likewise require careful separation of assent, court entry, credited redress, reimbursement and actual payment. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a12\">A12</a></p>\n<p>The unresolved question is therefore sharper than “is there an appeal?” Does a correction reach the recipient? Does it reach exported copies and enforcement systems? Is a completed case reopened? Is access, money or reputation restored where warranted? The most revealing missing artifact would be an ordinary operational trace connecting those events—not an implausible confession of hidden intent.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-coherent-pictureand-its-remaining-breaks\">The coherent picture—and its remaining breaks</h2>\n<p>The record now supports several connected institutional stories, with specific cross-domain bridges and consequential local powers. It also supports a comparative model: resources sustain capacity; selection and definitions shape what is assessed; assessments can condition access; recipients may add their own restrictions; and correction must cross the same institutional boundaries as the original action. These roles are a way of investigating the systems, not proof that all of them form one coordinated pipeline. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a22\">A22</a></p>\n<p>The original broad hypothesis of common direction remains open. Evidence of local coordination has strengthened considerably, while evidence of divergence and retained discretion makes a single-controller account less adequate as a default explanation. No acquired chain establishes the broader Fabian/WEF/owner-bank/medical-data coordination suggested earlier. Those remain hypotheses or unresolved leads, not conclusions smuggled in through visual proximity.</p>\n<p>The dated stablecoin supplement reaches a similar boundary: BlackRock&#x27;s reserve management, BNY&#x27;s custody and Circle&#x27;s issuance are different functions. The retained check examines actual control surfaces but establishes no instruction chain from them to Steam&#x27;s restrictions. It remains a bounded 9 September check, with no live-key audit or new current-law verification. <a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index#a15\">A15</a></p>\n<p>The next most discriminating evidence lies between the roles already identified: a donor&#x27;s actual terms and exercised approval; a redacted supplier&#x27;s real agreement; a classification revision received and acted on by a customer; an application paired with its response and usable data; an assurance report paired with corrective action. That is where the investigation can turn a plausible pattern into a demonstrated mechanism—or rule one out.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index\">Inspect the claim and evidence index</a>. The full atlas retains detailed relationships that this account cannot reasonably narrate. Source counts describe records, not independent witnesses; several edges can rest on one document. This consolidation reconciles accepted material and selected stale questions. It does not claim every surviving lead has been exhausted.</p>",
        "path": "CURRENT-SYNTHESIS.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "Consolidated account of retained research through **9 September 2026**. This account accompanies r33 and two explicitly identified supplements. It is an interpretation of the acquired record, not a fresh audit of every original or a claim that the institutions below share one controller.\n\nThe investigation has moved beyond a list of people who know one another. We can identify recurring ways in which resources become influence: financing particular work, selecting the people who perform it, defining qualifying categories, supplying assessments, and attaching practical consequences to those assessments. An advertisement, a payment relationship, a platform account or access to research data can depend on decisions made across several institutions.\n\nThe most useful unit is **the handoff**. Who supplied an assessment? Under which agreement, rule or duty did someone else act on it? Who retained discretion? What actually happened? Who could reverse it? The record contains real financial and policy connections, along with shared methods and analogous structures. Those are different kinds of connection, and the coherent account depends on keeping them distinct.\n\nOur strongest overall interpretation is that practical power is often distributed across these decision points. A central command is unnecessary for a restrictive result: independently motivated institutions can combine to produce it. That is an explanatory possibility supported by several bounded examples, not proof that every restriction arose this way. Common funders also support divergent positions, regulators decline proposals, distributors exit relationships, and courts or regulators impose remedies. Those observations constrain the stronger theory of a unified programme.\n\n## AI advocacy: capacity, selection and editorial authority\n\nThe original question remains important. The retained record shows substantial organised resources behind AI advocacy and several concrete routes into creator production. FLI's 2025 standalone audit reports **US$45,197,838 in grants from Lightcone Foundation**. Earlier transfers involving Lightcone Foundation and Future of Life Europe concern assets and organisational allocation; they cannot be added together as annual persuasion expenditure. Lightcone Foundation is also a different entity from Lightcone Infrastructure. Scale is real, but the accounting categories matter. [A1](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a1)\n\nCreator influence is not one arrangement. People First's published terms provide for approval, revisions, compliance and conditional payment; an individual campaign statement of work was not acquired. Frame describes an independent creator track and an institutional-brief track, names funding sources, and denies funder control over content or selection. A Future Tense creator publicly acknowledged support from FLI, Frame and BlueDot while asserting editorial independence. Rational Animations and ControlAI acknowledged a partnership, but the fee and agreement remain unacquired. The sponsor behind the initial Sabine Hossenfelder account remains unidentified. [A2](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a2)\n\nSelection can affect public communication without script approval. Supporting people who already share a concern can increase that concern's reach. That inference requires less than editorial command, but it still cannot identify an undisclosed payment or instruction. ControlAI's acquired UK articles locate formal management and membership authority in its directors. A small related-organisation payable in its US return does not name the counterparty and cannot complete an assumed UK–US funding chain. [A3](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a3)\n\nThe Global Call for AI Red Lines supplies a documented campaign-production chain: drafting, management, partner feedback and signatory work have named roles. CeSIA, The Future Society and CHAI are organisers; ControlAI and FLI provided partner feedback. The Call is distinct from ControlAI's **A Narrow Path**. Evan Hubinger's signature does not assign him every proposal advanced by another participant. Advocacy and summit access also remain separate from government adoption. This branch supplies real coordination, with a bounded object and purpose. [A4](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a4)\n\n## Shared resources do not settle the policy position\n\nOak's grants make an instructive comparison. Its published 2025 awards include three-year support to Check My Ads, Digital Freedom Fund and Statewatch. Statewatch endorsed objections to broad scanning and possible identity requirements in the EU child-abuse proposal; the WeProtect Secretariat supported mandatory detection with safeguards in a different, earlier version of that debate. The comparison is evidence of divergent interventions, not a same-draft controlled experiment.\n\nDFF reports support for Liberty's challenge concerning the alleged Apple technical-capability notice. Liberty filed in March 2025, before the reported June 2026 grant. Funding could sustain existing litigation; it did not originate that filing. Acquired procedural results also do not determine the merits. A common donor is therefore an important financial connection, but not a sufficient explanation of every recipient's choices. [A5](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a5)\n\nDFF's selection reforms further separate donor resources, project selection and award execution. Public descriptions assign project selection to external peers and information/facilitation roles to staff, with confidentiality and conflict commitments. They do not reveal every operative recusal, signature or payment decision. The question “who chooses?” needs an answer at each stage. [A6](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a6)\n\n## Policy travels through documents and decisions\n\nThe UK–Australia duty-of-care lane supplies stronger transmission evidence than a shared-event roster. Carnegie-associated work, collaboration with Reset and citations in Australia's statutory review connect a developed model to official consideration. Commissioned research and programme funding sustained parts of that policy infrastructure; later funding cannot be assigned authorship of an earlier idea.\n\nThe Australian exposure draft dated 8 September 2026 would allocate consequential discretion among Parliament's framework, ministerial rules and eSafety. It remains a proposal. Reset requested access for academic and third-sector researchers; the acquired draft instead requires employment by an Australian university and approval under prospective rules. That is a meaningful narrowing, not an awarded NGO entitlement. The private adult-consent provision limits what the duty requires; it does not create a universal adult veto. Nothing inspected establishes universal identification. [A7](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a7)\n\nThe UK record also distinguishes required outcomes from particular identity suppliers. Ofcom recognises different age-assurance methods and accepted email-based estimation after supplied evidence; that was a methodological choice, not vendor certification or procurement. Check My Ads later sought customer/identity checks for monetising creators and advertisers and pre-monetisation clearance where risk indicators appear. Those proposals could affect pseudonymity and income, but do not concern every ordinary viewer. Ofcom expressly considered its crisis-revenue request and did not recommend specific monetisation practices in that measure. Other recommendations retain their own unresolved dispositions. [A8](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a8)\n\nFull Fact offers unusually precise evidence of input and institutional response. Ofcom attributes a notice-indicator amendment to its submission and questions from an earlier DSIT meeting. A notice becomes an indicator to consider; the provider retains its criteria-based crisis determination. The record supports a specific contribution while leaving the meeting's underlying records and other decisions unacquired. Influence is visible without assuming wholesale control. [A8](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a8)\n\nThe newly integrated procurement evidence makes the same distinction financially concrete. CDDP's Oliver Wyman evaluation commission has a disclosed **£656,000 price excluding VAT**, proposed criteria and a Treasury-linked feasibility gate. These establish commissioning and conditions, not payment, the final evaluation or an exercised funding decision. The announced **£8.4 million programme allocation** cannot be added to supplier prices as separate expenditure. Redactions and inconsistent contract dates remain unresolved. [A23](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a23)\n\nOSDI had a CDEI-convened advisory group, PA Consulting programme evaluation and supplier participation by Faculty and PUBLIC. These are distinct roles. PUBLIC's account of a TRL4 sandbox describes prototype work; its later STCF2 assessment explicitly credits OSDI practices while retaining limited testing and supplier-reported performance. PUBLIC's claim to have contributed to CDDP does not identify it in a redacted subcontract list. Its current website-controller legal identity is not proof of the historical contracting party. The record now connects programmes, methods and personnel more clearly while preserving the missing agreements and acceptance decisions. [A24](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a24)\n\n## A classification matters because someone acts on it\n\nThe Lantern case study reports Meta sharing signals followed by separate investigations and action by Cash App and Xbox. The underlying case files were not inspected; the actions remain operator-reported. Programme rules include recourse, removal of no-longer-relevant information and administrator notification. Nothing in that case establishes that Lantern caused Steam removals. The live question is how information becomes a recipient decision, and what follows when the information changes. [A9](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a9)\n\nPayment records make the recipient's role especially clear. Mastercard's retained August 2026 MATCH rules require inquiry but expressly permit onboarding a listed merchant. Stripe publishes a generally disqualifying practice with possible exceptions. The list and a restrictive underwriting decision are connected, but are not identical or a universal prohibition on banking. The 2025 eGumball appellate opinion applies FilmOn's reasoning about audience, purpose and context to confidential commercial reporting: an actual judicial bridge between advertising classification and payment reporting. Its procedural decision does not adjudicate the underlying report's truth or restore a merchant. [A11](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a11)\n\nOther infrastructure gates allocate authority differently. Nominet's documented IWF cooperation predates the 2021 UK Safer Internet Centre grant, weakening the claim that the grant created that relationship. PIPCU combines public funding and police assessment with private intelligence; its announced industry co-funding pilot starts in April 2027 and does not establish current contributor command. Operation Creative's dated procedure allocates police tactical judgment, while advertising recipients choose how to implement information. Broader KYBC requests sought identification and consequences for commercial customers; requested reach across hosting and payments is not enacted universal user-ID law. [A13](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a13)\n\nAdvertising classification adds a question about scale: is the object a page, channel or whole domain? February 2025 Senate letters questioned financing a website even where advertisements avoided prohibited material. DoubleVerify subsequently announced default Highly Illicit and P2P Sharing and Streaming categories and later reported implementation. The chronology does not establish that the letters uniquely caused the change. NCMEC notifications, DV's assessment and its later IWF relationship are different inputs. Announced defaults do not constitute our observation of customer settings, and general customer-choice language does not prove an override in every configuration. [A14](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a14)\n\nCounterpressure belongs in this account. TAG reported no violations of the investigated brand-safety guidelines: its determination, not independent exoneration. DV's complaint challenged critics' assertions: allegations, not judicial findings. Its disclosed fee model does not establish a bounty for blacklisting. The consequences can be significant without a proven private motive or a single upstream instruction.\n\nGDI illustrates why time matters. Its advertising-risk data had a documented Oracle distribution route, but Oracle's relevant service ended in September 2024. IAS later said it discontinued limited past GDI inputs. Historical relationships cannot establish present delivery. A publisher-review procedure may revise GDI's assessment, but the acquired record does not show automatic propagation to every buyer or an obligation to resume advertising. [A16](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a16)\n\n## Research access has its own gatekeepers\n\nGDI's public funding and research work reveal further roles without completing an alleged government blacklist. FCDO described supervised activities outside the United States; the signed grant and commercial-reuse conditions remain unacquired. CORDIS identifies a German GDI entity and a **€385,275 EU contribution** to AI4TRUST, not the whole consortium budget or an assumed UK guarantee. Project documents show keywords and annotations, model-assisted triage and human review. A seed term is not a verdict; a research warning is not an advertising ban. GDI's request for mandatory tool/API compatibility is a bid for an institutional role, not proof of its award. [A17](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a17)\n\nThe integrated EU access rules separate three mechanisms. Article 40(4) provides project-specific vetting and a reasoned request through the relevant Digital Services Coordinator. Article 40(12) concerns public-data access. Article 22 trusted-flagger priority concerns notices and is different again. Funding and independence disclosures can form part of eligibility; public overviews need not name every applicant or funder. Neither Horizon funding nor a failed exact-name search establishes whether GDI received platform access. [A18](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a18)\n\nAliExpress's June 2025 binding commitments supply concrete procedures and clocks. The company nominates and pays a monitoring trustee; the Commission approves and supervises the role. Paying the trustee does not confer the Commission's approval power, and appointment does not establish delivery of a report. The substantive commitment term and external reporting schedule differ. A later illegal-product fine concerns a separate issue; it is not evidence of breach of the research-access commitments. [A19](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a19)\n\n## Assurance is not the same evidence as a delivered result\n\nThe retained FTI audit offers a useful stress test. It gives a positive Article 40(12) opinion while reporting **no approved applications** in the year ending June 2025. It says all examined applications were incomplete or invalid. The record supports a narrower conclusion about assessed readiness. It does not establish either that meaningful access was delivered or that requests were improperly refused. Its period also precedes the monitoring trustee's appointment. [A20](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a20)\n\nTwo explanations remain possible: legitimate screening of deficient requests, or an interpretation/cure process that makes an access right difficult to use. Without application files, responses and actual delivery, the public audit cannot decide between them. Likewise, the first monitoring report and the Commission's response were not acquired; absence from the acquired record is not proof of non-delivery.\n\nThe researcher-side material is informative but not an adjudication. The DSA40 Collaboratory collects voluntary reports, assists applicants and advocates support for intermediaries. Its September 2026 tracker headline reports **70 applications**, while its retained table sums to **68**; other subtotals also differ. Its one open AliExpress entry lacks the identity and dates needed to connect it to GDI or the FTI cohort. Organisers' judgments that rejection reasons are invalid are leads, not acquired rulings. Disclosed project and host funding establish resources, not donor control of findings. [A21](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a21)\n\nThis is the same evidentiary problem seen in the procurement branch: an evaluator commissioned, a test described, a positive opinion, an accepted application and a useful result are distinct events. Counting one as another can make both success and obstruction appear more certain than the record permits.\n\n## Can correction travel as far as the consequence?\n\nThe retained public ThreatExchange client provides a substantive counterexample to technical permanence. At the inspected commit, deletion markers can remove local records; a stale-checkpoint path calls for clearing and a fresh fetch; opinion structures can represent disagreement. These are static capabilities in particular code paths, not a demonstrated end-to-end deployed execution trace. Lantern's use of hosted ThreatExchange does not prove its participants use that client or version. No account restoration was observed. TCAP's separately inspected hash interface also documents deletion and feedback; a historical Altitude importer is another interface and version. [A10](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a10)\n\nThere are also actual obligations constraining recipient discretion. The January 2025 CFPB order requires Block to provide specified restriction/appeal notices and to decide an appeal and change status as appropriate within ten business days. That does not guarantee every appellant restored access or constitute an admission of every finding. It does materially narrow the earlier remedy gap. Acquired July settlement terms likewise require careful separation of assent, court entry, credited redress, reimbursement and actual payment. [A12](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a12)\n\nThe unresolved question is therefore sharper than “is there an appeal?” Does a correction reach the recipient? Does it reach exported copies and enforcement systems? Is a completed case reopened? Is access, money or reputation restored where warranted? The most revealing missing artifact would be an ordinary operational trace connecting those events—not an implausible confession of hidden intent.\n\n## The coherent picture—and its remaining breaks\n\nThe record now supports several connected institutional stories, with specific cross-domain bridges and consequential local powers. It also supports a comparative model: resources sustain capacity; selection and definitions shape what is assessed; assessments can condition access; recipients may add their own restrictions; and correction must cross the same institutional boundaries as the original action. These roles are a way of investigating the systems, not proof that all of them form one coordinated pipeline. [A22](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a22)\n\nThe original broad hypothesis of common direction remains open. Evidence of local coordination has strengthened considerably, while evidence of divergence and retained discretion makes a single-controller account less adequate as a default explanation. No acquired chain establishes the broader Fabian/WEF/owner-bank/medical-data coordination suggested earlier. Those remain hypotheses or unresolved leads, not conclusions smuggled in through visual proximity.\n\nThe dated stablecoin supplement reaches a similar boundary: BlackRock's reserve management, BNY's custody and Circle's issuance are different functions. The retained check examines actual control surfaces but establishes no instruction chain from them to Steam's restrictions. It remains a bounded 9 September check, with no live-key audit or new current-law verification. [A15](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md#a15)\n\nThe next most discriminating evidence lies between the roles already identified: a donor's actual terms and exercised approval; a redacted supplier's real agreement; a classification revision received and acted on by a customer; an application paired with its response and usable data; an assurance report paired with corrective action. That is where the investigation can turn a plausible pattern into a demonstrated mechanism—or rule one out.\n\n[Inspect the claim and evidence index](consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md). The full atlas retains detailed relationships that this account cannot reasonably narrate. Source counts describe records, not independent witnesses; several edges can rest on one document. This consolidation reconciles accepted material and selected stale questions. It does not claim every surviving lead has been exhausted.\n",
        "file": "research/current-synthesis.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08",
        "title": "Discord age assurance: transcript verification",
        "description": "The video identifies a real expansion of age-gated access and real financial/digital-identity infrastructure. It overstates the evidence when it describes universal identity uploads or treats a newly completed global rollout as established. The implementation's trust boundaries matter: Discord's age decision, third-party evidence processing, upstream credent",
        "html": "<h2 id=\"result\">Result</h2>\n<p>The video identifies a real expansion of age-gated access and real financial/digital-identity infrastructure. It overstates the evidence when it describes universal identity uploads or treats a newly completed global rollout as established. The implementation&#x27;s trust boundaries matter: Discord&#x27;s age decision, third-party evidence processing, upstream credential creation, and old support-ticket retention are separate data surfaces.</p>\n<h2 id=\"rollout-versus-tests\">Rollout versus tests</h2>\n<p>Discord announced global teen defaults on 9 February 2026, initially for March. The announcement now carries a 24 February correction postponing global age assurance to the second half of 2026. It explicitly excludes universal ID uploads/face scans and predicts more than 90% need no additional action. The original announced restrictions include adult-only Stage speaking. Narrow searches of current official sources found no September 8 relaunch notice: the latest central help page inspected (updated August 10) still describes delayed broader global expansion, and limited June–August experiments in Australia/Brazil, with Google Wallet also tested in the UK. This is evidence of a continuing plan and tests, not proof nothing changed in individual accounts after the page update.</p>\n<p>Sources: http[local research file] (February 9; February 24 correction, Teen Safety Settings and clarification); http[local research file] (February 24; March 9 Brazil update); http[local research file] (August 10 update, opening note).</p>\n<p>Discord&#x27;s February 24 FAQ describes internal age inference from account tenure, payment method on file and activity patterns, and says message contents are excluded. The 90% figure is a company projection, not an independently measured result. http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-restricted\">What is restricted</h2>\n<p>The current UK page (July 28 update) covers every new/existing UK account. Unconfirmed users retain accounts, ordinary servers, friends, DMs and voice. They cannot access age-restricted channels/servers, enable age-restricted app commands or NSFW-server access on iOS, unblur flagged media, select Show in sensitive-content filters, or disable Message Requests. Flagged media is blurred with friends/in servers and blocked in stranger DMs. Before accepting a message request, attachments are unavailable and links inert; accepting it permits normal communication subject to existing permissions. Large-server activity visibility can be changed without age assurance. Friend-request warnings cannot currently be disabled. This is not a ban on ordinary voice or all DMs. Stage-speaking restrictions are explicitly part of the announced global package and central help trigger list; the UK page does not separately list them.</p>\n<p>Source: http[local research file] (Default Safety Settings and FAQ); Stage: global announcement above.</p>\n<h2 id=\"methods-and-data-boundaries\">Methods and data boundaries</h2>\n<p>The August 10 central help page says:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Route</th>\n<th>Processing / what Discord receives</th>\n<th>Status</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>k-ID facial age estimation</td>\n<td>Video remains on device; Discord gets estimated age</td>\n<td>Established method</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ID scan plus matching selfie</td>\n<td>Document path names k-ID and Veratad; Discord says it never sees images and receives age; images deleted after confirmation</td>\n<td>Established method</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Credit card</td>\n<td>k-ID routes to Stripe; card details unseen/unretained by Discord, unretained by k-ID; Discord gets adult yes/no</td>\n<td>Limited test</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Google Wallet</td>\n<td>Discord gets age group and country, other ID information stays in Wallet</td>\n<td>Limited test</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Credit route excludes debit/prepaid; a possible sub-US$0.50 charge is refunded within 14 business days. Central privacy wording qualifies deletion as quick/in most cases immediate, so avoid an absolute universal instantaneous-deletion guarantee. Source: http[local research file] (Choose Your Method, privacy).</p>\n<p>k-ID independently documents Stripe credit-card verification and Veratad ID authentication. Card verification proves adult status by the card-ownership proxy, particularly where credit ownership is adult-restricted; it is not a document-based proof of the person typing. Its wider catalogue includes other methods, which must not be presumed deployed on Discord. http[local research file] (Credit card verification; ID scan verification).</p>\n<p>k-ID&#x27;s privacy policy (updated July 10, 2026) specifies that proof data is processed by providers, k-ID receives/stores the verification result, and its on-device FAE provider is Privately. It also describes jurisdiction information, device identifiers/analytics in its wider services, and session retention determined by customers. Thus &#x27;no retained ID image&#x27; does not mean &#x27;no retained metadata.&#x27; Crucially, its introduction says customer-provided data processed for integrated products is governed by customer contracts; the public policy covers its controller activities. Do not apply every Family Connect or website-analytics category to Discord users without the integration-specific terms. Its generic policy says k-ID itself does not receive proof information, while Discord describes data going directly to k-ID and Veratad: best read k-ID as an orchestrated service path unless a technical integration proves which endpoint receives bytes. http[local research file] (information required for age assurance; sections 2, 5, 9).</p>\n<p>Stripe&#x27;s general policy allows transaction and verification data processing and retention after completed transactions for fraud, legal and financial obligations. Neither the Discord nor k-ID page establishes Stripe&#x27;s exact retention/configuration for this integration. A refund is not evidence of data deletion. http[local research file] and http[local research file] (Security and retention).</p>\n<p>Google&#x27;s ID-pass setup requires a supported passport, its information-page and NFC-chip scans, and a face video. Automated biometric comparison or human review may be used; biometric templates are deleted following verification. The resulting pass is encrypted locally; the user reviews app-requested information before agreeing to share it. Therefore a minimal age signal to Discord can still depend on prior identity proofing at Google. http[local research file] (Create an ID pass; automated face matching; Use your ID pass; Manage your ID pass).</p>\n<p>Document-version trap: search returned a cached June 23 variant of Discord&#x27;s central page saying Google shares birthdate transiently with Discord and listing an Incode test. The live canonical August 10 page instead says age group + country and omits Incode. Use the live version for current claims; do not silently mix them or infer the engineering change/date from wording alone.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-2025-breach\">The 2025 breach</h2>\n<p>Discord&#x27;s October 3 statement, updated October 9, says approximately 70,000 users MAY have had government-ID photos exposed through the customer-service ticketing incident; these related to age appeals. It also lists support communications, contact details, IP addresses and limited billing, excluding full card numbers and general chats. This does not establish 70,000 selfies, that every image was exfiltrated, or that all were publicly distributed. http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Discord calls it compromise of support vendor 5CA. 5CA&#x27;s October 14 statement (updated October 27) disputes that its own systems were breached and says one employee&#x27;s actions enabled access to the client&#x27;s third-party ticketing system; it also denies handling government IDs. Preserve that disagreement rather than resolve it by choosing one company&#x27;s wording. Both accounts support a support-access failure; they do not identify k-ID/Stripe as breached. http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"structural-implications-and-unresolved-checks\">Structural implications and unresolved checks</h2>\n<p>The substantive pattern is attribute-gated participation relying on several credential providers, rather than evidence that every platform directly builds a passport database. Card infrastructure can authorize access without being the content-moderation authority. Minimal disclosure reduces one exposure while preserving dependency on upstream proofing, eligibility rules and authentication. The old appeals channel demonstrates that exception handling and support permissions may retain identity exposure even when the normal verification flow advertises minimization.</p>\n<p>Unknown: September account-by-account rollout coverage; Discord-specific Stripe retention and metadata linkage; implemented Wallet disclosure at the time of an individual test; audit proof of deletion/isolation; precise resolution of the 5CA disagreement. Neither a data-sale motive nor a common NGO/funder directing these Discord changes is established by these records. Discord/k-ID expressly deny selling the relevant user data; those are policy representations, not a forensic audit.</p>",
        "path": "discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-discord-methods",
          "s2-kid-methods",
          "s2-kid-privacy",
          "s2-wallet",
          "s2-discord-incident",
          "s2-5ca-response"
        ],
        "markdown": "## Result\n\nThe video identifies a real expansion of age-gated access and real financial/digital-identity infrastructure. It overstates the evidence when it describes universal identity uploads or treats a newly completed global rollout as established. The implementation's trust boundaries matter: Discord's age decision, third-party evidence processing, upstream credential creation, and old support-ticket retention are separate data surfaces.\n\n## Rollout versus tests\n\nDiscord announced global teen defaults on 9 February 2026, initially for March. The announcement now carries a 24 February correction postponing global age assurance to the second half of 2026. It explicitly excludes universal ID uploads/face scans and predicts more than 90% need no additional action. The original announced restrictions include adult-only Stage speaking. Narrow searches of current official sources found no September 8 relaunch notice: the latest central help page inspected (updated August 10) still describes delayed broader global expansion, and limited June–August experiments in Australia/Brazil, with Google Wallet also tested in the UK. This is evidence of a continuing plan and tests, not proof nothing changed in individual accounts after the page update.\n\nSources: http[local research file] (February 9; February 24 correction, Teen Safety Settings and clarification); http[local research file] (February 24; March 9 Brazil update); http[local research file] (August 10 update, opening note).\n\nDiscord's February 24 FAQ describes internal age inference from account tenure, payment method on file and activity patterns, and says message contents are excluded. The 90% figure is a company projection, not an independently measured result. http[local research file]\n\n## What is restricted\n\nThe current UK page (July 28 update) covers every new/existing UK account. Unconfirmed users retain accounts, ordinary servers, friends, DMs and voice. They cannot access age-restricted channels/servers, enable age-restricted app commands or NSFW-server access on iOS, unblur flagged media, select Show in sensitive-content filters, or disable Message Requests. Flagged media is blurred with friends/in servers and blocked in stranger DMs. Before accepting a message request, attachments are unavailable and links inert; accepting it permits normal communication subject to existing permissions. Large-server activity visibility can be changed without age assurance. Friend-request warnings cannot currently be disabled. This is not a ban on ordinary voice or all DMs. Stage-speaking restrictions are explicitly part of the announced global package and central help trigger list; the UK page does not separately list them.\n\nSource: http[local research file] (Default Safety Settings and FAQ); Stage: global announcement above.\n\n## Methods and data boundaries\n\nThe August 10 central help page says:\n\n| Route | Processing / what Discord receives | Status |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| k-ID facial age estimation | Video remains on device; Discord gets estimated age | Established method |\n| ID scan plus matching selfie | Document path names k-ID and Veratad; Discord says it never sees images and receives age; images deleted after confirmation | Established method |\n| Credit card | k-ID routes to Stripe; card details unseen/unretained by Discord, unretained by k-ID; Discord gets adult yes/no | Limited test |\n| Google Wallet | Discord gets age group and country, other ID information stays in Wallet | Limited test |\n\nCredit route excludes debit/prepaid; a possible sub-US$0.50 charge is refunded within 14 business days. Central privacy wording qualifies deletion as quick/in most cases immediate, so avoid an absolute universal instantaneous-deletion guarantee. Source: http[local research file] (Choose Your Method, privacy).\n\nk-ID independently documents Stripe credit-card verification and Veratad ID authentication. Card verification proves adult status by the card-ownership proxy, particularly where credit ownership is adult-restricted; it is not a document-based proof of the person typing. Its wider catalogue includes other methods, which must not be presumed deployed on Discord. http[local research file] (Credit card verification; ID scan verification).\n\nk-ID's privacy policy (updated July 10, 2026) specifies that proof data is processed by providers, k-ID receives/stores the verification result, and its on-device FAE provider is Privately. It also describes jurisdiction information, device identifiers/analytics in its wider services, and session retention determined by customers. Thus 'no retained ID image' does not mean 'no retained metadata.' Crucially, its introduction says customer-provided data processed for integrated products is governed by customer contracts; the public policy covers its controller activities. Do not apply every Family Connect or website-analytics category to Discord users without the integration-specific terms. Its generic policy says k-ID itself does not receive proof information, while Discord describes data going directly to k-ID and Veratad: best read k-ID as an orchestrated service path unless a technical integration proves which endpoint receives bytes. http[local research file] (information required for age assurance; sections 2, 5, 9).\n\nStripe's general policy allows transaction and verification data processing and retention after completed transactions for fraud, legal and financial obligations. Neither the Discord nor k-ID page establishes Stripe's exact retention/configuration for this integration. A refund is not evidence of data deletion. http[local research file] and http[local research file] (Security and retention).\n\nGoogle's ID-pass setup requires a supported passport, its information-page and NFC-chip scans, and a face video. Automated biometric comparison or human review may be used; biometric templates are deleted following verification. The resulting pass is encrypted locally; the user reviews app-requested information before agreeing to share it. Therefore a minimal age signal to Discord can still depend on prior identity proofing at Google. http[local research file] (Create an ID pass; automated face matching; Use your ID pass; Manage your ID pass).\n\nDocument-version trap: search returned a cached June 23 variant of Discord's central page saying Google shares birthdate transiently with Discord and listing an Incode test. The live canonical August 10 page instead says age group + country and omits Incode. Use the live version for current claims; do not silently mix them or infer the engineering change/date from wording alone.\n\n## The 2025 breach\n\nDiscord's October 3 statement, updated October 9, says approximately 70,000 users MAY have had government-ID photos exposed through the customer-service ticketing incident; these related to age appeals. It also lists support communications, contact details, IP addresses and limited billing, excluding full card numbers and general chats. This does not establish 70,000 selfies, that every image was exfiltrated, or that all were publicly distributed. http[local research file]\n\nDiscord calls it compromise of support vendor 5CA. 5CA's October 14 statement (updated October 27) disputes that its own systems were breached and says one employee's actions enabled access to the client's third-party ticketing system; it also denies handling government IDs. Preserve that disagreement rather than resolve it by choosing one company's wording. Both accounts support a support-access failure; they do not identify k-ID/Stripe as breached. http[local research file]\n\n## Structural implications and unresolved checks\n\nThe substantive pattern is attribute-gated participation relying on several credential providers, rather than evidence that every platform directly builds a passport database. Card infrastructure can authorize access without being the content-moderation authority. Minimal disclosure reduces one exposure while preserving dependency on upstream proofing, eligibility rules and authentication. The old appeals channel demonstrates that exception handling and support permissions may retain identity exposure even when the normal verification flow advertises minimization.\n\nUnknown: September account-by-account rollout coverage; Discord-specific Stripe retention and metadata linkage; implemented Wallet disclosure at the time of an individual test; audit proof of deletion/isolation; precise resolution of the 5CA disagreement. Neither a data-sale motive nor a common NGO/funder directing these Discord changes is established by these records. Discord/k-ID expressly deny selling the relevant user data; those are policy representations, not a forensic audit.\n",
        "file": "research/discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08",
        "title": "Steam transcript intake: age credentials, policy sponsorship, and data custody",
        "description": "Research date: 2026-09-08. Nova. This is an addendum to the existing Influence Atlas campaign, not a new completed investigation or an explorer data release.",
        "html": "<p>Research date: 2026-09-08. Nova. This is an addendum to the existing Influence Atlas campaign, not a new completed investigation or an explorer data release.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-changes-the-model\">What changes the model</h2>\n<p>The useful extension is the relation among payment permission, age-credential supply, and identity-data custody. These are different dependencies with different operators. An app may receive an age band without possessing an identity document; a verifier or support provider may nevertheless retain source documents elsewhere. A remedy at the operating-system layer need not resolve a storefront&#x27;s separate obligations. The existence of several dependencies does not establish common direction.</p>\n<p>A newly documented institutional bridge deserves follow-up: ICMEC publicly lists payment companies as donors to its financial coalition, while California&#x27;s official April 2025 committee analysis identifies ICMEC and Children Now as sponsors of AB1043. ICMEC programme funding, legislative sponsorship, research citation, and software implementation must retain their separate relation types. The present record does not show that those donations financed the legislation, whitepaper, or Steam restrictions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"primary-policy-and-technical-evidence\">Primary policy and technical evidence</h2>\n<p>California&#x27;s April 22, 2025 committee analysis, concerning the March 28 version of AB1043, names the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC) and Children Now as sponsors. This is sponsorship of that legislative proposal, not a grant amount or authorship of every eventual provision.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Wicks&#x27;s March 25, 2025 announcement cites a 2021 5Rights report and quotes ICMEC policy-engagement director Bob Cunningham describing continuing work with Wicks and her staff on drafting. This is a specific citation and publicly stated collaboration; it is not proof of 5Rights drafting or funding AB1043.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Wicks&#x27;s September 9, 2025 announcement publishes endorsements by Google, Meta and Internet Works, alongside Children Now and Common Sense Media. Meta&#x27;s Dan Sachs explicitly supports centralizing age verification within app stores and operating systems. Kareem Ghanem is Google&#x27;s quoted policy executive. These are dated advocacy statements, not proof of a shared contract or identical commercial interests.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>ICMEC&#x27;s supporters page identifies Mastercard, PayPal and Visa, among others, as donors to its Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation. That subsection supplies neither amounts nor donation dates. A separate general donor list is expressly a $25,000-plus roster as of May 1, 2023; do not describe it as a fresh 2026 donor list. No earmark to the age-assurance initiative is established.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Microsoft&#x27;s August 27, 2026 documentation describes Windows age-range and verification-status APIs. Applications receive a bracket rather than a birthdate. The five brackets span under 10 through 18+. Microsoft-account session and registered application identity are requirements. The page says the APIs are not yet enabled and are planned for later 2026; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks. This is documented architecture, not evidence that every Windows user currently needs to upload government ID. Who may obtain meaningful signals, acceptable proof methods, refusal, correction and appeal remain consequential implementation questions.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>As checked September 8, AB1856 is enrolled and was presented to the Governor September 4; the official record does not yet show signature. Its text excludes qualifying open-source distributors from the OS-provider definition, preserves an age-declaration interface and app/store signal duties, and restricts unnecessary signal requests and reuse. It does not impose a universal government-ID upload requirement. The separate OS/store definitions mean an OS exemption cannot simply be treated as an exemption for the entire Steam ecosystem; precise application to Valve&#x27;s mixed distribution remains unresolved. Earlier drafts adding general browser/website duties should not be passed off as the enrolled text.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"idscannet-a-distinct-custody-branch\">IDScan.net: a distinct custody branch</h2>\n<p>Krebs&#x27;s September 1 report identifies IDScan.net as the apparent source of a service advertising over 153 million driver-license records. That is not an independently established count of unique people. The alleged year-long ongoing exfiltration is the seller&#x27;s claim; capture timestamps are not intrusion timestamps. His participant interviews and timestamp comparisons are attributed investigative evidence. His September 2 update records Caesars saying it stopped using VeriScan in February 2025, had no active accounts and did not authorize retention; the vendor told Caesars no impact was expected. A customer-logo roster is not an affected-client list.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>IDScan.net&#x27;s own September 4 notice says an unauthorized party may have accessed/copied information within customer accounts in its cloud. It names possible exposure of names and government-ID numbers, says the investigation continues and confirms cooperation with federal law enforcement. It does not confirm 153 million individuals or a full image inventory. A claim that the company has issued no statement is now outdated.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>The company&#x27;s May 23, 2022 Planet13 case study describes merchant scanners, six-image capture, centralized VeriScan visitor management and parsed ID data/images passed into Dutchie&#x27;s point-of-sale system. This documents a commercial data path. It does not establish that Dutchie was breached or that the particular incident arose from online age-assurance mandates.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"next-records-with-high-explanatory-value\">Next records with high explanatory value</h2>\n<p>ICMEC&#x27;s age-assurance project budget and restricted-grant terms could connect or separate its financial-coalition funding from policy work. Legislative sponsor correspondence, versioned drafts and technical-submission records could identify who wrote or altered the operative architecture. Microsoft app-registration terms and verification-provider criteria could establish practical admission and refusal powers. Vendor data-processing agreements, retention schedules, subprocessor lists and deletion audit evidence could establish where an identity check leaves durable copies. IDScan&#x27;s forensic account inventory and breach notices would clarify actual incident reach.</p>\n<p>The video also raises LG telemetry, litigation against Valve, ownership predictions and a broad data-monetization motive. Those were not established by this bounded intake. They remain separate leads, not new factual links in the atlas.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-limits\">Custody and limits</h2>\n<p>Primary pages and public original reporting were inspected through the web tool. No stolen records or criminal service were accessed. Direct archival capture of the Wicks page failed (web open 502; Python certificate-chain failure); indexed full-page text was available and read. No local raw-page capture is claimed. This intake does not modify the tested explorer or its portable bundle, and does not restart the paused heartbeat. Additional agent findings are appended below when received.</p>\n<h2 id=\"icmec-technical-proposal-provenance\">ICMEC technical proposal provenance</h2>\n<p>The supplied policy-site PDF is also hosted on ICMEC&#x27;s official CDN. Agent inspection found byte-identical copies and no named writer, project funder or credited corporate partner. The February 7, 2025 filename is not independently verified publication timing. The proposal calls for device-based verification, local or other secure OS-managed storage, and OS review/approval of website API integrations before age data is shared. Apple, Google and Microsoft are named as needed collaborators rather than proven participants. This supplies a policy-design record concerning API admission authority; it does not prove Microsoft implemented that paper or that its privacy claims have been validated.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>The legal operator of AgeVerificationPolicy.org remains unresolved. Its displayed AV Policy Source copyright and links to ICMEC/Free Speech Coalition do not establish ownership or a formal partnership.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discord-verification-addendum\">Discord verification addendum</h2>\n<p>Read discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md for the separately sourced review. Discord&#x27;s August 10 primary methods page names k-ID/Veratad for document checks, k-ID/Stripe for the credit-card experiment and Google Wallet for an age-group/country signal. Credit and Wallet routes remain labelled limited tests; this pass found no official September 8 global-launch confirmation. The October 2025 age-appeals support incident concerns a different custody path and must not be assigned to those verification providers. These are vendor relationships and distinct rollout states, not evidence that Stripe directs Discord policy.</p>\n<h2 id=\"integration-decision\">Integration decision</h2>\n<p>Retain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.</p>",
        "path": "intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-wicks-drafting",
          "s2-wicks-support",
          "s2-age-paper-copy",
          "s2-windows",
          "s2-idscan-notice",
          "s2-idscan-casestudy"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research date: 2026-09-08. Nova. This is an addendum to the existing Influence Atlas campaign, not a new completed investigation or an explorer data release.\n\n## What changes the model\n\nThe useful extension is the relation among payment permission, age-credential supply, and identity-data custody. These are different dependencies with different operators. An app may receive an age band without possessing an identity document; a verifier or support provider may nevertheless retain source documents elsewhere. A remedy at the operating-system layer need not resolve a storefront's separate obligations. The existence of several dependencies does not establish common direction.\n\nA newly documented institutional bridge deserves follow-up: ICMEC publicly lists payment companies as donors to its financial coalition, while California's official April 2025 committee analysis identifies ICMEC and Children Now as sponsors of AB1043. ICMEC programme funding, legislative sponsorship, research citation, and software implementation must retain their separate relation types. The present record does not show that those donations financed the legislation, whitepaper, or Steam restrictions.\n\n## Primary policy and technical evidence\n\nCalifornia's April 22, 2025 committee analysis, concerning the March 28 version of AB1043, names the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC) and Children Now as sponsors. This is sponsorship of that legislative proposal, not a grant amount or authorship of every eventual provision.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nWicks's March 25, 2025 announcement cites a 2021 5Rights report and quotes ICMEC policy-engagement director Bob Cunningham describing continuing work with Wicks and her staff on drafting. This is a specific citation and publicly stated collaboration; it is not proof of 5Rights drafting or funding AB1043.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nWicks's September 9, 2025 announcement publishes endorsements by Google, Meta and Internet Works, alongside Children Now and Common Sense Media. Meta's Dan Sachs explicitly supports centralizing age verification within app stores and operating systems. Kareem Ghanem is Google's quoted policy executive. These are dated advocacy statements, not proof of a shared contract or identical commercial interests.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nICMEC's supporters page identifies Mastercard, PayPal and Visa, among others, as donors to its Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation. That subsection supplies neither amounts nor donation dates. A separate general donor list is expressly a $25,000-plus roster as of May 1, 2023; do not describe it as a fresh 2026 donor list. No earmark to the age-assurance initiative is established.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nMicrosoft's August 27, 2026 documentation describes Windows age-range and verification-status APIs. Applications receive a bracket rather than a birthdate. The five brackets span under 10 through 18+. Microsoft-account session and registered application identity are requirements. The page says the APIs are not yet enabled and are planned for later 2026; unknown/unavailable responses require fallbacks. This is documented architecture, not evidence that every Windows user currently needs to upload government ID. Who may obtain meaningful signals, acceptable proof methods, refusal, correction and appeal remain consequential implementation questions.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nAs checked September 8, AB1856 is enrolled and was presented to the Governor September 4; the official record does not yet show signature. Its text excludes qualifying open-source distributors from the OS-provider definition, preserves an age-declaration interface and app/store signal duties, and restricts unnecessary signal requests and reuse. It does not impose a universal government-ID upload requirement. The separate OS/store definitions mean an OS exemption cannot simply be treated as an exemption for the entire Steam ecosystem; precise application to Valve's mixed distribution remains unresolved. Earlier drafts adding general browser/website duties should not be passed off as the enrolled text.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]\n\n## IDScan.net: a distinct custody branch\n\nKrebs's September 1 report identifies IDScan.net as the apparent source of a service advertising over 153 million driver-license records. That is not an independently established count of unique people. The alleged year-long ongoing exfiltration is the seller's claim; capture timestamps are not intrusion timestamps. His participant interviews and timestamp comparisons are attributed investigative evidence. His September 2 update records Caesars saying it stopped using VeriScan in February 2025, had no active accounts and did not authorize retention; the vendor told Caesars no impact was expected. A customer-logo roster is not an affected-client list.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nIDScan.net's own September 4 notice says an unauthorized party may have accessed/copied information within customer accounts in its cloud. It names possible exposure of names and government-ID numbers, says the investigation continues and confirms cooperation with federal law enforcement. It does not confirm 153 million individuals or a full image inventory. A claim that the company has issued no statement is now outdated.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nThe company's May 23, 2022 Planet13 case study describes merchant scanners, six-image capture, centralized VeriScan visitor management and parsed ID data/images passed into Dutchie's point-of-sale system. This documents a commercial data path. It does not establish that Dutchie was breached or that the particular incident arose from online age-assurance mandates.\nhttp[local research file]\n\n## Next records with high explanatory value\n\nICMEC's age-assurance project budget and restricted-grant terms could connect or separate its financial-coalition funding from policy work. Legislative sponsor correspondence, versioned drafts and technical-submission records could identify who wrote or altered the operative architecture. Microsoft app-registration terms and verification-provider criteria could establish practical admission and refusal powers. Vendor data-processing agreements, retention schedules, subprocessor lists and deletion audit evidence could establish where an identity check leaves durable copies. IDScan's forensic account inventory and breach notices would clarify actual incident reach.\n\nThe video also raises LG telemetry, litigation against Valve, ownership predictions and a broad data-monetization motive. Those were not established by this bounded intake. They remain separate leads, not new factual links in the atlas.\n\n## Custody and limits\n\nPrimary pages and public original reporting were inspected through the web tool. No stolen records or criminal service were accessed. Direct archival capture of the Wicks page failed (web open 502; Python certificate-chain failure); indexed full-page text was available and read. No local raw-page capture is claimed. This intake does not modify the tested explorer or its portable bundle, and does not restart the paused heartbeat. Additional agent findings are appended below when received.\n\n## ICMEC technical proposal provenance\n\nThe supplied policy-site PDF is also hosted on ICMEC's official CDN. Agent inspection found byte-identical copies and no named writer, project funder or credited corporate partner. The February 7, 2025 filename is not independently verified publication timing. The proposal calls for device-based verification, local or other secure OS-managed storage, and OS review/approval of website API integrations before age data is shared. Apple, Google and Microsoft are named as needed collaborators rather than proven participants. This supplies a policy-design record concerning API admission authority; it does not prove Microsoft implemented that paper or that its privacy claims have been validated.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]\n\nThe legal operator of AgeVerificationPolicy.org remains unresolved. Its displayed AV Policy Source copyright and links to ICMEC/Free Speech Coalition do not establish ownership or a formal partnership.\n\n## Discord verification addendum\n\nRead discord-age-assurance-verification-2026-09-08.md for the separately sourced review. Discord's August 10 primary methods page names k-ID/Veratad for document checks, k-ID/Stripe for the credit-card experiment and Google Wallet for an age-group/country signal. Credit and Wallet routes remain labelled limited tests; this pass found no official September 8 global-launch confirmation. The October 2025 age-appeals support incident concerns a different custody path and must not be assigned to those verification providers. These are vendor relationships and distinct rollout states, not evidence that Stripe directs Discord policy.\n\n## Integration decision\n\nRetain these findings as a sourced intake pending the next atlas content revision. Highest-priority new node: ICMEC, with distinct financial-programme donor, legislative-sponsor and technical-proposal relationships. New infrastructure nodes include Windows age-signaling, k-ID, Veratad, Google Wallet and IDScan.net/VeriScan. Never connect IDScan to Discord without a separate source. Priority questions concern programme earmarks, drafting provenance, provider admission, credential refusal/correction, retention and deletion duties. No public release or automated restart occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/intake-steam-age-infrastructure-2026-09-08.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09",
        "title": "Stablecoin, payment and California discussion check",
        "description": "Checked 9 September 2026. Bounded factual follow-up; no canonical case or reader revision. Earlier campaign records were used to recover the Steam/payment source chain, then relevant documents were checked currently. No outreach or paid access.",
        "html": "<p>Checked 9 September 2026. Bounded factual follow-up; no canonical case or reader revision. Earlier campaign records were used to recover the Steam/payment source chain, then relevant documents were checked currently. No outreach or paid access.</p>\n<p>California: AB1043 is chaptered, operative1January2027; it requires declared age/DOB and bracket signals, not government-ID upload. AB1856 remains enrolled at Governor as of9September; its proposed licence-based OS-provider exclusion is separate from app-store duties. No SteamOS-specific legal determination acquired.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Circle:2025 SEC filing reports a four-year March2025 agreement allocating at least90% of U.S.-managed fiat USDC reserves excluding bank deposits to BlackRock products, subject exceptions. BlackRock manages the reserve fund; BNY custodies assets; Circle issues USDC. This does not assign BlackRock the token-blocklisting authority.\nSource: http[local research file] (Partnership with BlackRock; reserve infrastructure).</p>\n<p>Circle terms21(15) include further transaction restrictions notified by bank/payment partners. Terms13/14 and21 address blocking/prevention and account/redemption consequences. On-chain blocking is expressly subject to separate access-denial policy: ordinary commercial objection to goods is not a separately enumerated trigger. A bank restriction does not by itself establish bank control of the on-chain key. Official EVM code documents privileged blacklist,pause and upgrade roles; no live key audit performed.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file]</p>\n<p>GENIUS is enacted; Treasury17August2026 identifies18January2027 as expected general effective date. Sections2(16),4(a)(5)-(6) specify lawful-order and blocking capability. Reserve eligibility includes multiple liquid-asset classes, not exclusively Treasury bills. CLARITY is not enacted: Senate8September record schedules cloture for15September. Treasury has publicly identified increased Treasury demand as intended; Treasury repayment obligations remain distinct from token redemption obligations.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Steam: reread recipient-published Valve statement describing Mastercard communications through processors/acquiring banks and brand-rule5.12.7, alongside Mastercard&#x27;s denial of requiring game restrictions. No named acquiring-bank owner or BlackRock instruction established. Official Steam purchasing FAQ search index contains an acquiring-bank/PayPal currency passage, but root web open and ordinaryGET did not yield readable relevant body; do not upgrade that indexed passage to a full inspected record. No additional route attempted.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The examined instruments do not establish the proposed wider bank-owner/BlackRock/Cayman/WEF/medical-data instruction chain or a shared origin for Steam lawsuits. These remain unestablished connections in this bounded check, not a finding that no such connection could exist. No political policy preference or recommendation is made.</p>",
        "path": "stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "Checked 9 September 2026. Bounded factual follow-up; no canonical case or reader revision. Earlier campaign records were used to recover the Steam/payment source chain, then relevant documents were checked currently. No outreach or paid access.\n\nCalifornia: AB1043 is chaptered, operative1January2027; it requires declared age/DOB and bracket signals, not government-ID upload. AB1856 remains enrolled at Governor as of9September; its proposed licence-based OS-provider exclusion is separate from app-store duties. No SteamOS-specific legal determination acquired.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file]\n\nCircle:2025 SEC filing reports a four-year March2025 agreement allocating at least90% of U.S.-managed fiat USDC reserves excluding bank deposits to BlackRock products, subject exceptions. BlackRock manages the reserve fund; BNY custodies assets; Circle issues USDC. This does not assign BlackRock the token-blocklisting authority.\nSource: http[local research file] (Partnership with BlackRock; reserve infrastructure).\n\nCircle terms21(15) include further transaction restrictions notified by bank/payment partners. Terms13/14 and21 address blocking/prevention and account/redemption consequences. On-chain blocking is expressly subject to separate access-denial policy: ordinary commercial objection to goods is not a separately enumerated trigger. A bank restriction does not by itself establish bank control of the on-chain key. Official EVM code documents privileged blacklist,pause and upgrade roles; no live key audit performed.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file]\n\nGENIUS is enacted; Treasury17August2026 identifies18January2027 as expected general effective date. Sections2(16),4(a)(5)-(6) specify lawful-order and blocking capability. Reserve eligibility includes multiple liquid-asset classes, not exclusively Treasury bills. CLARITY is not enacted: Senate8September record schedules cloture for15September. Treasury has publicly identified increased Treasury demand as intended; Treasury repayment obligations remain distinct from token redemption obligations.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file] ; http[local research file]\n\nSteam: reread recipient-published Valve statement describing Mastercard communications through processors/acquiring banks and brand-rule5.12.7, alongside Mastercard's denial of requiring game restrictions. No named acquiring-bank owner or BlackRock instruction established. Official Steam purchasing FAQ search index contains an acquiring-bank/PayPal currency passage, but root web open and ordinaryGET did not yield readable relevant body; do not upgrade that indexed passage to a full inspected record. No additional route attempted.\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file]\n\nThe examined instruments do not establish the proposed wider bank-owner/BlackRock/Cayman/WEF/medical-data instruction chain or a shared origin for Steam lawsuits. These remain unestablished connections in this bounded check, not a finding that no such connection could exist. No political policy preference or recommendation is made.\n",
        "file": "research/stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "tegmark-lightcone-followup",
        "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
        "description": "Tegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI's current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization's cu",
        "html": "<p>Tegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI&#x27;s current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization&#x27;s current position, not an independently established technical conclusion or a ban on all AI.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Lightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Impala&#x27;s separate Mission Statement field reproduces:\n“TO SUPPORTING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF THE FUTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION, PRIMARILY VIA GRANTMAKING.”\nThis is an aggregator&#x27;s tax-data reproduction, not a directly recovered charter. It names Future of Life FOUNDATION (FLF, EIN88-0926067). Impala has an AI-generated summary nearby and inconsistent fiscal-year labels; do not rely on its summary for new transaction amounts.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>FLI&#x27;s primary2022 return ScheduleA PartVI says its articles were amended December14 2022 to become a supporting organization to FLF. ScheduleO, PDFp51, reproduces amended Article3, limiting its operation to supporting FLF&#x27;s purposes within charitable rules. This is more than a shared-name association, but the group&#x27;s ScheduleR cross-control fields do not justify a simple unverified parent/subsidiary tree.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>FLI&#x27;s primary2024 ScheduleR identifies Lightcone as a related grantmaker and records$21.05m received from it. These records support actual affiliation and financial movements while leaving specific grant decision rights and all inter-entity contracts unresolved.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>FLF&#x27;s own site describes actively creating organizations and initiatives, recruiting founders, running fellowships and commissioning prototypes. It focuses on AI tools for collective human agency; current priorities address AI-supported reasoning, collaboration and reliable knowledge. Its approach is selective/proactive rather than an open grants process. This is concrete self-described activity, not demonstrated effectiveness.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>A lower-readiness lead: philanthropy.org&#x27;s FY2022 transcription lists a$10m Lightcone grant to SVCF; Impala labels a matching amount2023. The underlying alternate PDF failed retrieval. Do not connect this to SVCF&#x27;s2023 CAIS grant without donor-account or onward-allocation evidence.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Tegmark&#x27;s February2 2026 Canadian parliamentary appearance supplies direct evidence of advocacy for mandatory safety testing while favoring beneficial AI tools. Other empirical claims in that testimony were not validated by this follow-up; testimony proves what a witness argued, not the accuracy of every assertion.\nhttp[local research file]</p>\n<p>Interpretation: distinguish the breadth of a nonprofit&#x27;s short mission from its current programs, legal relationships, and exercised grantmaking discretion. The reporting focus is who decides which approaches get resources. A broad mandate or ominous-sounding name does not by itself establish improper conduct.</p>",
        "path": "tegmark-lightcone-followup.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "Tegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI's current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization's current position, not an independently established technical conclusion or a ban on all AI.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered.\nhttp[local research file]\nhttp[local research file]\n\nImpala's separate Mission Statement field reproduces:\n“TO SUPPORTING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF THE FUTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION, PRIMARILY VIA GRANTMAKING.”\nThis is an aggregator's tax-data reproduction, not a directly recovered charter. It names Future of Life FOUNDATION (FLF, EIN88-0926067). Impala has an AI-generated summary nearby and inconsistent fiscal-year labels; do not rely on its summary for new transaction amounts.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nFLI's primary2022 return ScheduleA PartVI says its articles were amended December14 2022 to become a supporting organization to FLF. ScheduleO, PDFp51, reproduces amended Article3, limiting its operation to supporting FLF's purposes within charitable rules. This is more than a shared-name association, but the group's ScheduleR cross-control fields do not justify a simple unverified parent/subsidiary tree.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nFLI's primary2024 ScheduleR identifies Lightcone as a related grantmaker and records$21.05m received from it. These records support actual affiliation and financial movements while leaving specific grant decision rights and all inter-entity contracts unresolved.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nFLF's own site describes actively creating organizations and initiatives, recruiting founders, running fellowships and commissioning prototypes. It focuses on AI tools for collective human agency; current priorities address AI-supported reasoning, collaboration and reliable knowledge. Its approach is selective/proactive rather than an open grants process. This is concrete self-described activity, not demonstrated effectiveness.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nA lower-readiness lead: philanthropy.org's FY2022 transcription lists a$10m Lightcone grant to SVCF; Impala labels a matching amount2023. The underlying alternate PDF failed retrieval. Do not connect this to SVCF's2023 CAIS grant without donor-account or onward-allocation evidence.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nTegmark's February2 2026 Canadian parliamentary appearance supplies direct evidence of advocacy for mandatory safety testing while favoring beneficial AI tools. Other empirical claims in that testimony were not validated by this follow-up; testimony proves what a witness argued, not the accuracy of every assertion.\nhttp[local research file]\n\nInterpretation: distinguish the breadth of a nonprofit's short mission from its current programs, legal relationships, and exercised grantmaking discretion. The reporting focus is who decides which approaches get resources. A broad mandate or ominous-sounding name does not by itself establish improper conduct.\n",
        "file": "research/tegmark-lightcone-followup.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis",
        "title": "AB 621: enforcement experience informs the proposed law",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root read all18 pages of the independently published 18 March2025 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis(httplocal research file This describes the introduced bill and proposed amendments; it is not the final statute.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root read all18 pages of the independently published [18 March2025 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis](http[local research file] This describes the introduced bill and proposed amendments; it is not the final statute.</p>\n<p>The analysis identifies San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu as sponsor and Rebecca Bauer-Kahan as author. It connects the proposal to Chiu&#x27;s2024 litigation against16 websites. Staff explicitly identifies payment processors as potential enabling-service defendants and explains the difficulty of reaching underlying operators. Chiu&#x27;s reproduced support statement argues for broader facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties to strengthen deterrence. These are documented design aims, not inferred motives. See PDF1,7-8,17.</p>\n<p>The dated support list names the City Attorney&#x27;s Office, California District Attorneys Association, Consumer Attorneys of California and Joyful Heart Foundation. California Civil Liberties Advocacy is listed as opposing unless amended, with free-expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. The analysis says the author offered the primary-purpose narrowing and prints its proposed redline. It does not establish which outside party obtained that concession or its later adoption. See PDF12-13,17-18. SAG-AFTRA&#x27;s sponsorship is attributed to predecessor AB602, not this bill.</p>\n<p>The payment-provider rationale is especially consequential for the investigation: the proposed extension reaches a commercial service needed by the underlying operator. Current law supplies a related conditional mechanism, but connecting particular wording to a legislator&#x27;s decision requires dated amendment evidence. Financial penalties and fee recovery are proposed litigation remedies; no source here establishes funds received, budget dependence or revenue-driven target selection.</p>\n<p>The analysis&#x27;s constitutional discussion, including its forecasts about section230, is staff reasoning as of March2025. Root read it without adopting its forecasts as judgments or freshly verified case law. The present inquiry does not audit every cited harm statistic or underlying lawsuit. Its dated claims about prevalence, studies and institutional practice remain source-attributed.</p>\n<p>Reading combined full official web-reader text and retained PDF extraction; no page omitted. Redline extraction merges deleted and inserted words, so proposed-change conclusions here rely on the explicit explanatory prose. Carver&#x27;s independent version lane must not use an ignored historical URL parameter as proof of old text. Later committee analysis and current statutory text are distinct sources with distinct dates.</p>\n<p>Original retained: assembly-privacy-march18.pdf,627,224bytes,18pages, SHA256602bea00e4c4bd481ca1bbdf3ae372c11c7289af7e8012fc55eb728f5a4a4aaf. root-captures.json records direct ordinaryGET200. No original support letters, lobbying correspondence, drafting instructions or fiscal allocation records were acquired in this root lane. Acquisition of later independently published analysis continues; this run has not yet reached its forest.</p>",
        "path": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09/march-analysis.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-march-analysis"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root read all18 pages of the independently published 18 March2025 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis (see source references) This describes the introduced bill and proposed amendments; it is not the final statute.\n\nThe analysis identifies San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu as sponsor and Rebecca Bauer-Kahan as author. It connects the proposal to Chiu's2024 litigation against16 websites. Staff explicitly identifies payment processors as potential enabling-service defendants and explains the difficulty of reaching underlying operators. Chiu's reproduced support statement argues for broader facilitator liability, explicit prosecutor standing and larger penalties to strengthen deterrence. These are documented design aims, not inferred motives. See PDF1,7-8,17.\n\nThe dated support list names the City Attorney's Office, California District Attorneys Association, Consumer Attorneys of California and Joyful Heart Foundation. California Civil Liberties Advocacy is listed as opposing unless amended, with free-expression, federal-law and service-provider-burden objections. The analysis says the author offered the primary-purpose narrowing and prints its proposed redline. It does not establish which outside party obtained that concession or its later adoption. See PDF12-13,17-18. SAG-AFTRA's sponsorship is attributed to predecessor AB602, not this bill.\n\nThe payment-provider rationale is especially consequential for the investigation: the proposed extension reaches a commercial service needed by the underlying operator. Current law supplies a related conditional mechanism, but connecting particular wording to a legislator's decision requires dated amendment evidence. Financial penalties and fee recovery are proposed litigation remedies; no source here establishes funds received, budget dependence or revenue-driven target selection.\n\nThe analysis's constitutional discussion, including its forecasts about section230, is staff reasoning as of March2025. Root read it without adopting its forecasts as judgments or freshly verified case law. The present inquiry does not audit every cited harm statistic or underlying lawsuit. Its dated claims about prevalence, studies and institutional practice remain source-attributed.\n\nReading combined full official web-reader text and retained PDF extraction; no page omitted. Redline extraction merges deleted and inserted words, so proposed-change conclusions here rely on the explicit explanatory prose. Carver's independent version lane must not use an ignored historical URL parameter as proof of old text. Later committee analysis and current statutory text are distinct sources with distinct dates.\n\nOriginal retained: assembly-privacy-march18.pdf,627,224bytes,18pages, SHA256602bea00e4c4bd481ca1bbdf3ae372c11c7289af7e8012fc55eb728f5a4a4aaf. root-captures.json records direct ordinaryGET200. No original support letters, lobbying correspondence, drafting instructions or fiscal allocation records were acquired in this root lane. Acquisition of later independently published analysis continues; this run has not yet reached its forest.\n",
        "file": "research/ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-march-analysis.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-version-changes",
        "title": "AB 621 version comparison — bounded access result",
        "description": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. No historical textual delta was established by this lane. The official version selector and bill history were verified, and the enacted baseline was already read in full. The attempted introduced-version download returned the chaptered version. Historical browser selection then encountered an explicit administrator-policy r",
        "html": "<p>Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. <strong>No historical textual delta was established by this lane.</strong> The official version selector and bill history were verified, and the enacted baseline was already read in full. The attempted introduced-version download returned the chaptered version. Historical browser selection then encountered an explicit administrator-policy refusal. Live LegInfo access is closed; this note does not convert index labels or a proposed committee redline into an adopted bill version.</p>\n<p>The actual selector in the retained [official chaptered-bill page](http[local research file] lists:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Selector date and stage</th>\n<th>Exact option value</th>\n<th>Substantive text state in this lane</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>13 February 2025 — Introduced</td>\n<td>20250AB62199INT</td>\n<td>Not acquired; attempted request returned v93 chaptered text.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>24 March 2025 — Amended Assembly</td>\n<td>20250AB62198AMD</td>\n<td>Not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>9 April 2025 — Amended Assembly</td>\n<td>20250AB62197AMD</td>\n<td>Not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3 July 2025 — Amended Senate</td>\n<td>20250AB62196AMD</td>\n<td>Not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5 September 2025 — Amended Senate</td>\n<td>20250AB62195AMD</td>\n<td>Not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>12 September 2025 — Enrolled</td>\n<td>20250AB62194ENR</td>\n<td>Not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>13 October 2025 — Chaptered</td>\n<td>20250AB62193CHP</td>\n<td>Complete operative text read in the prior statutory lane; reused baseline, not a new historical finding.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The retained [official history](http[local research file] corroborates the amendment dates and records approval/chaptering on 13 October 2025. It separately records enrollment and presentation to the Governor on 22 September; that event must not be substituted for the selector’s 12 September enrolled-text date. The index/history evidence establishes dated publication or procedural stages, not their substantive changes.</p>\n<p>The enacted baseline contains the primary-purpose definition at <strong>1708.86(a)(3)</strong>; substantive third-party knowing-facilitation/reckless-aiding liability at <strong>(b)(3)</strong>; the conditional presumption, sufficient evidence, required particulars and delivery route at <strong>(c)(2)(A)</strong>; receipt-based 30 days and court extension at <strong>(c)(2)(B)</strong>; federal protection at <strong>(i)</strong>; and specific ISP boundaries at <strong>(j)</strong>. This lane cannot say when those words first entered or changed. The full enacted scope remains in <a href=\"/research/sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism\">statutory-mechanism.md</a>. Root’s independently published March 18 committee proposal/redline is a separate primary artifact: it can establish what was offered or explained at that point, but without an actual later version it does not independently establish adoption on March 24.</p>\n<h2 id=\"returned-version-mismatch\">Returned-version mismatch</h2>\n<p>The selector values were taken from the actual retained HTML control, not invented. An ordinary request to <code>http[local research file]</code> returned HTTP 200, but the document’s hidden <code>vid</code> was <strong>20250AB62193CHP</strong>, and its body identified <strong>AB621:v93#DOCUMENT</strong>, Chapter 673, approved/filed 13 October 2025. It therefore did not return the requested introduced text.</p>\n<p>Those bytes are retained as <strong>version-query-returned-chaptered.html</strong>, SHA-256 <code>66c94ef928832a7373a41a203dd41584072523e273efb516b29f030dc180633f</code>, and explicitly <strong>excluded as historical-version evidence</strong>. The derivative is version-query-returned-chaptered.txt. Neither is represented as an introduced bill, and the HTTP success code is not treated as successful version acquisition. Earlier requested-version filenames were renamed to avoid that implication. Before this direct request, the web reader returned a non-retryable URL-opening error for the historical query; it did not provide historical text either.</p>\n<h2 id=\"administrative-access-refusal-and-closure\">Administrative access refusal and closure</h2>\n<p>Tool: <strong>mcp__cua_repl.js</strong>. Action: <code>cua.createBrowserTab(&quot;chrome&quot;, &quot;http[local research file] { sessionName: &quot;📜 AB 621 versions&quot; })</code>. Target: the official bill’s ordinary version-selection page. The tool returned this exact refusal:</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>This is an administrator-policy/browser access refusal, <strong>not</strong> an automatic sandbox approval-review rejection. No live LegInfo request, mirror, proxy, other-agent acquisition or indirect workaround followed it. The previously failed 10 September Assembly Floor Analysis form was not retried. Already retained local originals remain available for reading; their custody does not establish access to unacquired historical versions.</p>\n<p>The reopening condition is restored verified access to the official historical controls, or legitimately provided original historical versions already in lawful custody. A later independent official publication can be assessed on its own provenance; it must not be sought as a proxy around this refusal. Root owns any next acquisition decision after the forest review.</p>\n<p>Metadata, exact selector values and the refusal are in <strong>version-captures.json</strong>. Selector source is the prior official <code>sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09/statutory-chaptered-ab621.html</code>, SHA-256 <code>9c3f9f8bd1019fd5c941781001d3bc2083745a3c09c4546768172c6e3d91d3e8</code>; history source SHA-256 <code>4467ecb0b50d8942d1bcc9366f3015f524f38d4ef8767f844839bf0ca42ea40a</code>. No organization is credited with winning an amendment on the basis of timing, and no canonical case or other-law branch was opened.</p>",
        "path": "ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09/version-changes.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-history",
          "w25-sf-s-excluded-version"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. **No historical textual delta was established by this lane.** The official version selector and bill history were verified, and the enacted baseline was already read in full. The attempted introduced-version download returned the chaptered version. Historical browser selection then encountered an explicit administrator-policy refusal. Live LegInfo access is closed; this note does not convert index labels or a proposed committee redline into an adopted bill version.\n\nThe actual selector in the retained official chaptered-bill page (see source references) lists:\n\n| Selector date and stage | Exact option value | Substantive text state in this lane |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 13 February 2025 — Introduced | 20250AB62199INT | Not acquired; attempted request returned v93 chaptered text. |\n| 24 March 2025 — Amended Assembly | 20250AB62198AMD | Not read. |\n| 9 April 2025 — Amended Assembly | 20250AB62197AMD | Not read. |\n| 3 July 2025 — Amended Senate | 20250AB62196AMD | Not read. |\n| 5 September 2025 — Amended Senate | 20250AB62195AMD | Not read. |\n| 12 September 2025 — Enrolled | 20250AB62194ENR | Not read. |\n| 13 October 2025 — Chaptered | 20250AB62193CHP | Complete operative text read in the prior statutory lane; reused baseline, not a new historical finding. |\n\nThe retained official history (see source references) corroborates the amendment dates and records approval/chaptering on 13 October 2025. It separately records enrollment and presentation to the Governor on 22 September; that event must not be substituted for the selector’s 12 September enrolled-text date. The index/history evidence establishes dated publication or procedural stages, not their substantive changes.\n\nThe enacted baseline contains the primary-purpose definition at **1708.86(a)(3)**; substantive third-party knowing-facilitation/reckless-aiding liability at **(b)(3)**; the conditional presumption, sufficient evidence, required particulars and delivery route at **(c)(2)(A)**; receipt-based 30 days and court extension at **(c)(2)(B)**; federal protection at **(i)**; and specific ISP boundaries at **(j)**. This lane cannot say when those words first entered or changed. The full enacted scope remains in [statutory-mechanism.md](sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism.md). Root’s independently published March 18 committee proposal/redline is a separate primary artifact: it can establish what was offered or explained at that point, but without an actual later version it does not independently establish adoption on March 24.\n\n## Returned-version mismatch\n\nThe selector values were taken from the actual retained HTML control, not invented. An ordinary request to `http[local research file]` returned HTTP 200, but the document’s hidden `vid` was **20250AB62193CHP**, and its body identified **AB621:v93#DOCUMENT**, Chapter 673, approved/filed 13 October 2025. It therefore did not return the requested introduced text.\n\nThose bytes are retained as **version-query-returned-chaptered.html**, SHA-256 `66c94ef928832a7373a41a203dd41584072523e273efb516b29f030dc180633f`, and explicitly **excluded as historical-version evidence**. The derivative is version-query-returned-chaptered.txt. Neither is represented as an introduced bill, and the HTTP success code is not treated as successful version acquisition. Earlier requested-version filenames were renamed to avoid that implication. Before this direct request, the web reader returned a non-retryable URL-opening error for the historical query; it did not provide historical text either.\n\n## Administrative access refusal and closure\n\nTool: **mcp__cua_repl.js**. Action: `cua.createBrowserTab(\"chrome\", \"http[local research file] { sessionName: \"📜 AB 621 versions\" })`. Target: the official bill’s ordinary version-selection page. The tool returned this exact refusal:\n\n> Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.\n\nThis is an administrator-policy/browser access refusal, **not** an automatic sandbox approval-review rejection. No live LegInfo request, mirror, proxy, other-agent acquisition or indirect workaround followed it. The previously failed 10 September Assembly Floor Analysis form was not retried. Already retained local originals remain available for reading; their custody does not establish access to unacquired historical versions.\n\nThe reopening condition is restored verified access to the official historical controls, or legitimately provided original historical versions already in lawful custody. A later independent official publication can be assessed on its own provenance; it must not be sought as a proxy around this refusal. Root owns any next acquisition decision after the forest review.\n\nMetadata, exact selector values and the refusal are in **version-captures.json**. Selector source is the prior official `sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09/statutory-chaptered-ab621.html`, SHA-256 `9c3f9f8bd1019fd5c941781001d3bc2083745a3c09c4546768172c6e3d91d3e8`; history source SHA-256 `4467ecb0b50d8942d1bcc9366f3015f524f38d4ef8767f844839bf0ca42ea40a`. No organization is credited with winning an amendment on the basis of timing, and no canonical case or other-law branch was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/ab621-origins-wave-2026-09-09-version-changes.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings",
        "title": "AI4TRUST classification decisions: scoring is described; the decision rules remain partly unavailable",
        "description": "Bounded acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. One new substantive primary original was and read. Two final deliverables were located through the official results index but their download service returned technical errors. No dataset, model or live platform was accessed. Existing D2.1 was neither renor reread in this lane; root owns its selected annex reading",
        "html": "<p>Bounded acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. One new substantive primary original was acquired and read. Two final deliverables were located through the official results index but their download service returned technical errors. No dataset, model or live platform was accessed. Existing D2.1 was neither reacquired nor reread in this lane; root owns its selected annex reading.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-new-primary-finding\">The new primary finding</h2>\n<p>The [CORDIS final-period report](http[local research file] covering <strong>1 March 2024–28 February 2026</strong> and last updated <strong>3 August 2026</strong>, reports that the final Disinformation Warning System combines outputs from <strong>six AI tools</strong>, using an <strong>ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration</strong>, producing triage categories and feature attribution. This is a considerably more specific mechanism than an unspecified risk score. Locator: “Work performed,” second reporting period, “Disinformation Warning System (WP3)”; official-reader line 141.</p>\n<p>The same report describes an enhanced Human Validation Dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It reports <strong>three evaluation rounds involving 206 users</strong>, including media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These are project-reported results hosted by the Commission, not this investigation&#x27;s reproduced performance or an independent Commission audit. Locators: WP5 and WP6, lines 143–144.</p>\n<p>Its approximately <strong>56% weighted F1</strong> concerns the separate textual disinformation-signals tool, which detects 39 signals across six tactics and eight languages. It is not the final warning system&#x27;s accuracy or a probability that a particular item is false. Locator: WP3 textual component, line 137. No model or benchmark was run here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"where-the-stages-remain-distinct\">Where the stages remain distinct</h2>\n<p>Collection, annotation, inference and action cannot be collapsed into one decision. The report separately describes data collection and ground-truth resources, component analyses, an aggregate warning system, human validation, and intended reporting to media professionals and policymakers. Its collection counts are not counts of adjudicated misinformation. Its component metrics are not measures of subsequent journalistic decisions or advertising restrictions.</p>\n<p>The published ensemble/calibration description does <strong>not disclose, in this read record</strong>, the six selected inputs, exact model weights, thresholds or triage-category definitions; who approved them; the training/validation split for the aggregate system; or how competing human assessments alter a score. “Human Validation Dashboard” is a named component, not an acquired override policy. Nor does a configurable interface establish authority to change model thresholds. The note therefore does not assert a reviewer veto, automatic score replacement, publisher appeal, correction propagation or final action right.</p>\n<p>The report identifies intended users and a research evaluation population. It does not provide an actual recipient distribution list, an executed downstream-use agreement, or an advertising-system interface. The strongest supported interpretation remains a research triage system intended to assist people. A route from its score to an ad ban, account restriction or government enforcement decision is not established by these records. That limit does not prove no subsequent use exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"exact-unavailable-instruments-and-access-boundary\">Exact unavailable instruments and access boundary</h2>\n<p>The official [project results index](http[local research file] last updated <strong>17 June 2026</strong>, exposes these two public records:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Indexed record</th>\n<th>Actual official module</th>\n<th>Access result</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Final release of disinformation detection tools and warning system</td>\n<td>[Document 080166e529e5a48d](http[local research file]</td>\n<td>Module HTML, followed through its own meta-refresh to technical error HDS-010; no deliverable bytes acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Evaluation and impact assessment report</td>\n<td>[Document 080166e529e59930](http[local research file]</td>\n<td>Same technical error, with a distinct document identifier; no deliverable bytes acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The download HTML explicitly supplied the next URL. Following that ordinary redirect was not a bypass. Both returned-error originals and their module originals are retained. Their HTTP 200 status does not turn the error pages into the requested reports. No retry after HDS-010, alternate mirror, login or helpdesk contact followed.</p>\n<p>The public platform About page was discovered by search at <code>http[local research file]</code>, but the reader returned 502 and the one ordinary GET failed verification of an expired certificate. That route was closed without disabling certificate checks. Search-indexed explanatory text remains discovery, not an independently read rule or current interface observation. The main project homepage reader separately returned a non-retryable unsafe-open error and was not fetched through another method.</p>\n<h2 id=\"precise-reopening-condition\">Precise reopening condition</h2>\n<p>The two indexed final records are the immediate expected instruments for the actual aggregate scoring and evaluation method. The known holders are the project consortium/coordinator and the Commission&#x27;s public document service. A useful next record would expose the approved score/category thresholds and evaluation protocol, or a reviewer workflow showing how disputed labels and overrides are authorized and recorded. GDI&#x27;s annotation codebook remains unacquired from the previous run. The public final-report narrative does not substitute for any of these instruments.</p>\n<p>This run produces a concrete method-level finding and a bounded document-access gap. No further source search, graph update, operational experiment or follow-on branch was undertaken.</p>\n<h2 id=\"read-and-custody-scope\">Read and custody scope</h2>\n<p><code>dss-reporting.html</code> and <code>dss-reporting.derived.txt</code>: full substantive final-period report read, from reporting-period heading through uptake needs, plus date field. Official-reader equivalents: lines 119–159. Original-source header was inspected only for record identity; no new grant-accounting conclusions are drawn. This is a current snapshot of a historical reporting period, not a claim that a live service is now operating.</p>\n<p><code>dss-index.reader.txt</code>: retained official-reader extract of deliverable listings, lines 119–199. Discovery index only; no full publication-list audit. <code>dss-final-module.html</code>, <code>dss-evaluation-module.html</code>, and the two <code>*.response.html</code> files retain the actual download wrappers/errors. <code>dss-transport.json</code> records URLs, timestamps, status and checksums. Exact hashes, source states and closed routes are in <code>dss-captures.json</code>.</p>",
        "path": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09/classification-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-finalreport",
          "w32-gdi-s-resultsindex",
          "w32-gdi-s-finaltools",
          "w32-gdi-s-finaleval"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. One new substantive primary original was acquired and read. Two final deliverables were located through the official results index but their download service returned technical errors. No dataset, model or live platform was accessed. Existing D2.1 was neither reacquired nor reread in this lane; root owns its selected annex reading.\n\n## The new primary finding\n\nThe CORDIS final-period report (see source references) covering **1 March 2024–28 February 2026** and last updated **3 August 2026**, reports that the final Disinformation Warning System combines outputs from **six AI tools**, using an **ensemble of LightGBM classifiers with isotonic regression calibration**, producing triage categories and feature attribution. This is a considerably more specific mechanism than an unspecified risk score. Locator: “Work performed,” second reporting period, “Disinformation Warning System (WP3)”; official-reader line 141.\n\nThe same report describes an enhanced Human Validation Dashboard and iterative user evaluation. It reports **three evaluation rounds involving 206 users**, including media professionals, fact-checkers, policy experts and students. These are project-reported results hosted by the Commission, not this investigation's reproduced performance or an independent Commission audit. Locators: WP5 and WP6, lines 143–144.\n\nIts approximately **56% weighted F1** concerns the separate textual disinformation-signals tool, which detects 39 signals across six tactics and eight languages. It is not the final warning system's accuracy or a probability that a particular item is false. Locator: WP3 textual component, line 137. No model or benchmark was run here.\n\n## Where the stages remain distinct\n\nCollection, annotation, inference and action cannot be collapsed into one decision. The report separately describes data collection and ground-truth resources, component analyses, an aggregate warning system, human validation, and intended reporting to media professionals and policymakers. Its collection counts are not counts of adjudicated misinformation. Its component metrics are not measures of subsequent journalistic decisions or advertising restrictions.\n\nThe published ensemble/calibration description does **not disclose, in this read record**, the six selected inputs, exact model weights, thresholds or triage-category definitions; who approved them; the training/validation split for the aggregate system; or how competing human assessments alter a score. “Human Validation Dashboard” is a named component, not an acquired override policy. Nor does a configurable interface establish authority to change model thresholds. The note therefore does not assert a reviewer veto, automatic score replacement, publisher appeal, correction propagation or final action right.\n\nThe report identifies intended users and a research evaluation population. It does not provide an actual recipient distribution list, an executed downstream-use agreement, or an advertising-system interface. The strongest supported interpretation remains a research triage system intended to assist people. A route from its score to an ad ban, account restriction or government enforcement decision is not established by these records. That limit does not prove no subsequent use exists.\n\n## Exact unavailable instruments and access boundary\n\nThe official project results index (see source references) last updated **17 June 2026**, exposes these two public records:\n\n| Indexed record | Actual official module | Access result |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Final release of disinformation detection tools and warning system | Document 080166e529e5a48d (see source references) | Module HTML, followed through its own meta-refresh to technical error HDS-010; no deliverable bytes acquired. |\n| Evaluation and impact assessment report | Document 080166e529e59930 (see source references) | Same technical error, with a distinct document identifier; no deliverable bytes acquired. |\n\nThe download HTML explicitly supplied the next URL. Following that ordinary redirect was not a bypass. Both returned-error originals and their module originals are retained. Their HTTP 200 status does not turn the error pages into the requested reports. No retry after HDS-010, alternate mirror, login or helpdesk contact followed.\n\nThe public platform About page was discovered by search at `http[local research file]`, but the reader returned 502 and the one ordinary GET failed verification of an expired certificate. That route was closed without disabling certificate checks. Search-indexed explanatory text remains discovery, not an independently read rule or current interface observation. The main project homepage reader separately returned a non-retryable unsafe-open error and was not fetched through another method.\n\n## Precise reopening condition\n\nThe two indexed final records are the immediate expected instruments for the actual aggregate scoring and evaluation method. The known holders are the project consortium/coordinator and the Commission's public document service. A useful next record would expose the approved score/category thresholds and evaluation protocol, or a reviewer workflow showing how disputed labels and overrides are authorized and recorded. GDI's annotation codebook remains unacquired from the previous run. The public final-report narrative does not substitute for any of these instruments.\n\nThis run produces a concrete method-level finding and a bounded document-access gap. No further source search, graph update, operational experiment or follow-on branch was undertaken.\n\n## Read and custody scope\n\n`dss-reporting.html` and `dss-reporting.derived.txt`: full substantive final-period report read, from reporting-period heading through uptake needs, plus date field. Official-reader equivalents: lines 119–159. Original-source header was inspected only for record identity; no new grant-accounting conclusions are drawn. This is a current snapshot of a historical reporting period, not a claim that a live service is now operating.\n\n`dss-index.reader.txt`: retained official-reader extract of deliverable listings, lines 119–199. Discovery index only; no full publication-list audit. `dss-final-module.html`, `dss-evaluation-module.html`, and the two `*.response.html` files retain the actual download wrappers/errors. `dss-transport.json` records URLs, timestamps, status and checksums. Exact hashes, source states and closed routes are in `dss-captures.json`.\n",
        "file": "research/ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-seed-reading",
        "title": "Root reading: retrieval perimeter is not a verdict",
        "description": "9 September 2026. This lane reuses the accepted AI4TRUST D2.1 original in ../gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09/horizon-d21.pdf, SHA256 1222963ce874a0455e10109cafff95ad201e1a43c1d6be6cfdd1848f9a2f2dfe. No new independent source or download. Current classification-run root text scope: PDF4-5 contents,53-59 and81-82. Earlier Horizon root text scope was2,3,11,12,",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. This lane reuses the accepted AI4TRUST D2.1 original in ../gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09/horizon-d21.pdf, SHA256 1222963ce874a0455e10109cafff95ad201e1a43c1d6be6cfdd1848f9a2f2dfe. No new independent source or download. Current classification-run root text scope: PDF4-5 contents,53-59 and81-82. Earlier Horizon root text scope was2,3,11,12,34,35,55,65,68,69 and visual2,11,55. These are selected pages of90, not a complete annex audit.</p>\n<p>PDF53-54 makes climate, health and migration initial development/test topics, with reusable selection criteria including cross-country relevance, historicity, factual assessability and consortium feasibility. It acknowledges that misinformation need not be a coordinated campaign. Its feasibility discussion is a dated2023 design account, not a current exclusion decision. It points to D2.2 for active topic-mining elaboration.</p>\n<p>PDF55 combines research/media/factchecker inputs with GDI&#x27;s existing internal lists and some ChatGPT suggestions. Broad initial keyword lists are to be refined by removing irrelevant terms and adding co-occurring terms. There is no per-term provenance: individual entries cannot all be attributed to GDI. These are collection seeds, not a website-risk codebook or an automatic sanction list.</p>\n<p>PDF56-58 includes neutral subjects such as weather, renewable energy, clinical trials, adverse events, immigration law and migrant rights alongside charged narratives, public figures and conspiracy language. Inclusion does not label a named person or proposition false. Duplicates and mixed capitalization occur; this document does not prove runtime configuration. The migration notes permit national or origin terms to vary by country and period. No bulk targeting list is reproduced here.</p>\n<p>PDF58-59 explicitly declares an intersectional methodological framing attentive to harm, discrimination and social identity. That is an observable normative choice. Its effect on annotation labels or thresholds still needs a rule-level record; the framing alone does not prove suppression. PDF81-82 shows German annex terms are locally adapted, rather than a literal English copy. Selected pages do not identify translator approval or update authority. They do not show German GDI authored every German term. French tail/Greek opening on these pages were contextual reading, not complete language-list review.</p>\n<p>The revealing distinction is collection perimeter versus treatment rule. Broad search terms can shape a sample, but a bias finding requires inspecting resulting coverage, annotation decisions and validation. The final report separately describes aggregate model scoring and human validation. Sampling, annotation, inference, human judgment and downstream action stay separate in this case. Actual codebook, aggregate thresholds, override rules and agreements remain unacquired. No person/site score audit or model execution occurred.</p>",
        "path": "ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09/root-seed-reading.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. This lane reuses the accepted AI4TRUST D2.1 original in ../gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09/horizon-d21.pdf, SHA256 1222963ce874a0455e10109cafff95ad201e1a43c1d6be6cfdd1848f9a2f2dfe. No new independent source or download. Current classification-run root text scope: PDF4-5 contents,53-59 and81-82. Earlier Horizon root text scope was2,3,11,12,34,35,55,65,68,69 and visual2,11,55. These are selected pages of90, not a complete annex audit.\n\nPDF53-54 makes climate, health and migration initial development/test topics, with reusable selection criteria including cross-country relevance, historicity, factual assessability and consortium feasibility. It acknowledges that misinformation need not be a coordinated campaign. Its feasibility discussion is a dated2023 design account, not a current exclusion decision. It points to D2.2 for active topic-mining elaboration.\n\nPDF55 combines research/media/factchecker inputs with GDI's existing internal lists and some ChatGPT suggestions. Broad initial keyword lists are to be refined by removing irrelevant terms and adding co-occurring terms. There is no per-term provenance: individual entries cannot all be attributed to GDI. These are collection seeds, not a website-risk codebook or an automatic sanction list.\n\nPDF56-58 includes neutral subjects such as weather, renewable energy, clinical trials, adverse events, immigration law and migrant rights alongside charged narratives, public figures and conspiracy language. Inclusion does not label a named person or proposition false. Duplicates and mixed capitalization occur; this document does not prove runtime configuration. The migration notes permit national or origin terms to vary by country and period. No bulk targeting list is reproduced here.\n\nPDF58-59 explicitly declares an intersectional methodological framing attentive to harm, discrimination and social identity. That is an observable normative choice. Its effect on annotation labels or thresholds still needs a rule-level record; the framing alone does not prove suppression. PDF81-82 shows German annex terms are locally adapted, rather than a literal English copy. Selected pages do not identify translator approval or update authority. They do not show German GDI authored every German term. French tail/Greek opening on these pages were contextual reading, not complete language-list review.\n\nThe revealing distinction is collection perimeter versus treatment rule. Broad search terms can shape a sample, but a bias finding requires inspecting resulting coverage, annotation decisions and validation. The final report separately describes aggregate model scoring and human validation. Sampling, annotation, inference, human judgment and downstream action stay separate in this case. Actual codebook, aggregate thresholds, override rules and agreements remain unacquired. No person/site score audit or model execution occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-seed-reading.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-oversight-findings",
        "title": "AliExpress trustee oversight: the public reporting frontier",
        "description": "Closed 9 September 2026. This lane sought the actual approved mandate, the first monitoring trustee report due in November 2025, or a Commission response, including researcher-access results and evidence sharing with the Article 37 auditor. No such case-specific substantive record was acquired. The two new HTML captures document the public routes inspected; ",
        "html": "<p>Closed 9 September 2026. This lane sought the actual approved mandate, the first monitoring trustee report due in November 2025, or a Commission response, including researcher-access results and evidence sharing with the Article 37 auditor. No such case-specific substantive record was acquired. The two new HTML captures document the public routes inspected; neither is a completed monitoring report. The adopted decision and appointment notice are reused originals from the preceding accepted run.</p>\n<p>The defensible result is a defined disclosure gap, not a finding that Ankura failed to report, that the Commission did nothing, or that AliExpress complied. The 2026 cycle ends on 30 September 2026 and its report is due within two months thereafter; it is not yet due at this research snapshot.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-current-public-routes-disclose\">What the current public routes disclose</h2>\n<p>The Commission&#x27;s [supervision index](http[local research file] which displays information updated on 31 August 2026, was read specifically at the AliExpress entry. Its 18 June 2025 row links the commitments narrative, monitoring trustee notice, adopted decision and press release. There is no separately labelled mandate, work plan, completed trustee report or Commission response in that inspected entry. The later 20 July 2026 fine is also listed, but the accepted preceding packet establishes its separate illegal-product risk assessment and mitigation scope. It cannot fill this researcher-access monitoring gap. This index is an overview of main enforcement activity, not a representation that every case document is published.</p>\n<p>Original <code>oversight-index.html</code>; scoped text <code>oversight-index.derived.txt</code>; exact relevant hrefs retained in <code>oversight-index.links.json</code>; official-reader representation <code>oversight-index.reader.txt</code>, lines 33–64. The links still resolve by identity to the already retained decision and appointment URLs: [decision 124718](http[local research file] and [appointment notice 124727](http[local research file] They were not downloaded again.</p>\n<p>Ankura&#x27;s [Monitorship &amp; Independent Oversight page](http[local research file] describes services and a different, unnamed automotive engagement. Its substantive body does not identify an AliExpress mandate, examination, finding or delivered report. It is retained as an inspected search route and excluded as proof of case-specific work. Original <code>oversight-ankura.html</code>; body/links derivatives and official-reader representation retained. The page provides no exact publication or modification date in the inspected body; the reader&#x27;s copyright year is not an engagement date. No contact or form was used, and no unrelated case or biography was followed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-existing-instrument-explains-the-expected-records-and-their-recipients\">The existing instrument explains the expected records and their recipients</h2>\n<p>The retained [18 June 2025 decision and annex](http[local research file] <code>../dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09/ali-decision.pdf</code>, supplies a precise record chain. This run text-read PDF 75–77, Annex C.5–17; earlier accepted scope for the wider decision is preserved in the prior manifest. No new visual reading is claimed.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Expected record or act</th>\n<th>Adopted requirement</th>\n<th>What is established here</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Approved trustee mandate</td>\n<td>C.5, PDF 75: Commission approves the proposed mandate, with modifications it considers necessary; appointment follows that approved mandate.</td>\n<td>The separate appointment notice confirms approval of Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited on 23 September 2025. It does not publish the mandate or disclose its negotiated terms.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Detailed work plan</td>\n<td>C.11, PDF 76: trustee proposes its monitoring work plan to the Commission within one month of appointment.</td>\n<td>Required submission; actual plan and receipt not acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>First report</td>\n<td>C.10, PDF 75, and C.12(iv), PDF 76: first report by 30 November 2025 covers the initial period ending 30 September 2025. Initial implementation was on a best-efforts basis; full obligations apply thereafter.</td>\n<td>Due date and initial assessment standard are established; delivery, tested scope, findings and Commission reaction remain unacquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Researcher-access evidence</td>\n<td>Prior accepted Annex B.V.7, PDF 66: semiannual material includes request totals, processing/approval/rejection, researcher feedback and technical tests. C.12(v), PDF 76 separately requires the trustee&#x27;s opinion on the first internal QA semiannual report within one month.</td>\n<td>This identifies useful expected evidence. No actual request counts, feedback, test results or trustee opinion was found. The first interim report should not automatically be treated as a full-year or mature-system evaluation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Noncompliance response</td>\n<td>C.12(vi)–(viii), PDF 76–77: trustee may propose necessary measures; must promptly report reasonably concluded failure to the Commission and answer its questions.</td>\n<td>Duties and permitted response, not an observed finding, recommendation or correction.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The first report goes to the Commission, with a contemporaneous copy to AliExpress that removes confidential third-party material where applicable (C.12(iv)). C.13(iv), PDF 77, restricts disclosure of confidential information and prohibits trustee public statements concerning performance of its functions. Those provisions make nonpublic reporting a plausible explanation for the search result. They neither establish that the whole report is confidential nor determine whether the Commission could release a nonconfidential version. No case-specific confidentiality or access-to-documents refusal was acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"auditor-sharing-is-a-real-route-not-an-observed-exchange\">Auditor sharing is a real route, not an observed exchange</h2>\n<p>C.12(iii), PDF 76, requires the trustee to minimise repetitive overlap with the Article 37 auditor. Where information is missing, the trustee may first ask whether the auditor has already collected it, request a copy, and rely on or incorporate the resulting material. AliExpress undertakes reasonably required steps enabling that disclosure. In the other direction, C.14, PDF 77, provides that the auditor will receive access, at its request, to relevant monitoring and reporting documents prepared by the trustee for the Commission.</p>\n<p>This is an express two-way evidence route. It does not prove that either party requested documents, shared a particular test or finding, or accepted the other&#x27;s conclusions. No automatic wholesale publication or transfer to researchers follows. The actual sharing request, document log or auditor reference to the first trustee report would discriminate between a permitted route and its exercise. Provider Article 37 audit discovery belongs to the parallel root lane and was not duplicated here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"search-scope-and-limits\">Search scope and limits</h2>\n<p>Thirteen targeted indexed queries were run in four batches, combining the exact service, trustee, case number, mandate, first-report date, researcher and Commission/Ankura domain terms. The complete query list and selected returned-path assessment are in <code>oversight-search-log.json</code>. Search returned the existing Commission announcement and case index, generic Ankura services, secondary summaries and unrelated results. It did not yield a new case-specific Commission or Ankura mandate, first report or response that could be read. Search result ranking and indexing are incomplete and can relax terms; this is not a comprehensive archive search.</p>\n<p>A public professional profile snippet attributed an appointment announcement to the named trustee, and an adviser firm&#x27;s snippet described support to Ankura. Neither was opened or acquired, and neither supplied a report or mandate. They remain discovery only; no personnel or subcontract decision is added. Generic other consumer-commitment reports and provider financial/audit results were excluded rather than mistaken for this monitoring instrument. Both selected original GETs returned HTTP 200; no failed transport route or fallback loop occurred in this run. Previously closed routes were not retried.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival explanation to nonperformance is that the first report was delivered privately under this recipient/confidentiality structure and has not been located publicly. Its converse remains possible too; the present record does not decide. The most useful next record is a nonconfidential version or receipt/response for Ankura&#x27;s first interim report due 30 November 2025, ideally with the researcher-access section and the Article 37 auditor cross-reference. Expected holders are Ankura, the Commission and AliExpress for its copy; the auditor may have relevant material if it requested access. The approved mandate and work plan would clarify the examination design. No request, contact or further acquisition was initiated.</p>",
        "path": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09/oversight-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-ankuraroute"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed 9 September 2026. This lane sought the actual approved mandate, the first monitoring trustee report due in November 2025, or a Commission response, including researcher-access results and evidence sharing with the Article 37 auditor. No such case-specific substantive record was acquired. The two new HTML captures document the public routes inspected; neither is a completed monitoring report. The adopted decision and appointment notice are reused originals from the preceding accepted run.\n\nThe defensible result is a defined disclosure gap, not a finding that Ankura failed to report, that the Commission did nothing, or that AliExpress complied. The 2026 cycle ends on 30 September 2026 and its report is due within two months thereafter; it is not yet due at this research snapshot.\n\n## What the current public routes disclose\n\nThe Commission's supervision index (see source references) which displays information updated on 31 August 2026, was read specifically at the AliExpress entry. Its 18 June 2025 row links the commitments narrative, monitoring trustee notice, adopted decision and press release. There is no separately labelled mandate, work plan, completed trustee report or Commission response in that inspected entry. The later 20 July 2026 fine is also listed, but the accepted preceding packet establishes its separate illegal-product risk assessment and mitigation scope. It cannot fill this researcher-access monitoring gap. This index is an overview of main enforcement activity, not a representation that every case document is published.\n\nOriginal `oversight-index.html`; scoped text `oversight-index.derived.txt`; exact relevant hrefs retained in `oversight-index.links.json`; official-reader representation `oversight-index.reader.txt`, lines 33–64. The links still resolve by identity to the already retained decision and appointment URLs: decision 124718 (see source references) and appointment notice 124727 (see source references) They were not downloaded again.\n\nAnkura's Monitorship & Independent Oversight page (see source references) describes services and a different, unnamed automotive engagement. Its substantive body does not identify an AliExpress mandate, examination, finding or delivered report. It is retained as an inspected search route and excluded as proof of case-specific work. Original `oversight-ankura.html`; body/links derivatives and official-reader representation retained. The page provides no exact publication or modification date in the inspected body; the reader's copyright year is not an engagement date. No contact or form was used, and no unrelated case or biography was followed.\n\n## The existing instrument explains the expected records and their recipients\n\nThe retained 18 June 2025 decision and annex (see source references) `../dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09/ali-decision.pdf`, supplies a precise record chain. This run text-read PDF 75–77, Annex C.5–17; earlier accepted scope for the wider decision is preserved in the prior manifest. No new visual reading is claimed.\n\n| Expected record or act | Adopted requirement | What is established here |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Approved trustee mandate | C.5, PDF 75: Commission approves the proposed mandate, with modifications it considers necessary; appointment follows that approved mandate. | The separate appointment notice confirms approval of Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited on 23 September 2025. It does not publish the mandate or disclose its negotiated terms. |\n| Detailed work plan | C.11, PDF 76: trustee proposes its monitoring work plan to the Commission within one month of appointment. | Required submission; actual plan and receipt not acquired. |\n| First report | C.10, PDF 75, and C.12(iv), PDF 76: first report by 30 November 2025 covers the initial period ending 30 September 2025. Initial implementation was on a best-efforts basis; full obligations apply thereafter. | Due date and initial assessment standard are established; delivery, tested scope, findings and Commission reaction remain unacquired. |\n| Researcher-access evidence | Prior accepted Annex B.V.7, PDF 66: semiannual material includes request totals, processing/approval/rejection, researcher feedback and technical tests. C.12(v), PDF 76 separately requires the trustee's opinion on the first internal QA semiannual report within one month. | This identifies useful expected evidence. No actual request counts, feedback, test results or trustee opinion was found. The first interim report should not automatically be treated as a full-year or mature-system evaluation. |\n| Noncompliance response | C.12(vi)–(viii), PDF 76–77: trustee may propose necessary measures; must promptly report reasonably concluded failure to the Commission and answer its questions. | Duties and permitted response, not an observed finding, recommendation or correction. |\n\nThe first report goes to the Commission, with a contemporaneous copy to AliExpress that removes confidential third-party material where applicable (C.12(iv)). C.13(iv), PDF 77, restricts disclosure of confidential information and prohibits trustee public statements concerning performance of its functions. Those provisions make nonpublic reporting a plausible explanation for the search result. They neither establish that the whole report is confidential nor determine whether the Commission could release a nonconfidential version. No case-specific confidentiality or access-to-documents refusal was acquired.\n\n## Auditor sharing is a real route, not an observed exchange\n\nC.12(iii), PDF 76, requires the trustee to minimise repetitive overlap with the Article 37 auditor. Where information is missing, the trustee may first ask whether the auditor has already collected it, request a copy, and rely on or incorporate the resulting material. AliExpress undertakes reasonably required steps enabling that disclosure. In the other direction, C.14, PDF 77, provides that the auditor will receive access, at its request, to relevant monitoring and reporting documents prepared by the trustee for the Commission.\n\nThis is an express two-way evidence route. It does not prove that either party requested documents, shared a particular test or finding, or accepted the other's conclusions. No automatic wholesale publication or transfer to researchers follows. The actual sharing request, document log or auditor reference to the first trustee report would discriminate between a permitted route and its exercise. Provider Article 37 audit discovery belongs to the parallel root lane and was not duplicated here.\n\n## Search scope and limits\n\nThirteen targeted indexed queries were run in four batches, combining the exact service, trustee, case number, mandate, first-report date, researcher and Commission/Ankura domain terms. The complete query list and selected returned-path assessment are in `oversight-search-log.json`. Search returned the existing Commission announcement and case index, generic Ankura services, secondary summaries and unrelated results. It did not yield a new case-specific Commission or Ankura mandate, first report or response that could be read. Search result ranking and indexing are incomplete and can relax terms; this is not a comprehensive archive search.\n\nA public professional profile snippet attributed an appointment announcement to the named trustee, and an adviser firm's snippet described support to Ankura. Neither was opened or acquired, and neither supplied a report or mandate. They remain discovery only; no personnel or subcontract decision is added. Generic other consumer-commitment reports and provider financial/audit results were excluded rather than mistaken for this monitoring instrument. Both selected original GETs returned HTTP 200; no failed transport route or fallback loop occurred in this run. Previously closed routes were not retried.\n\nThe strongest rival explanation to nonperformance is that the first report was delivered privately under this recipient/confidentiality structure and has not been located publicly. Its converse remains possible too; the present record does not decide. The most useful next record is a nonconfidential version or receipt/response for Ankura's first interim report due 30 November 2025, ideally with the researcher-access section and the Article 37 auditor cross-reference. Expected holders are Ankura, the Commission and AliExpress for its copy; the auditor may have relevant material if it requested access. The approved mandate and work plan would clarify the examination design. No request, contact or further acquisition was initiated.\n",
        "file": "research/ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-oversight-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings",
        "title": "A positive audit with no approved public-data requests",
        "description": "Closed and root-reviewed 9 September 2026. This bounded lane the Commission audit index and the linked AliExpress 2024/25 audit and implementation report. It inspected the public-data access obligation, selected audit identity/method/evidence passages, and report dates. It did not read all 365 audit pages or test the live system.",
        "html": "<p>Closed and root-reviewed 9 September 2026. This bounded lane acquired the Commission audit index and the linked AliExpress 2024/25 audit and implementation report. It inspected the public-data access obligation, selected audit identity/method/evidence passages, and report dates. It did not read all 365 audit pages or test the live system.</p>\n<p>The [FTI audit](http[local research file] PDF295-297, gives Article40(12) a positive conclusion with no recommendation. The explanation expressly concerns intention and capability. It describes a public application form, an SOP for evaluation/amendment/communication, Legal-team management, designated staff applying40(8)(b)-(e), and standardized approval/rejection/clarification emails. Approved access is described as DSA Ads, Items and Punishments datasets via dashboard and request-dependent API queries. This is the auditor&#x27;s account of the process, not our exercised access.</p>\n<p>The consequential observation is that no applications were approved during 1 July2024-30 June2025. The request count is redacted. The auditor says it inspected all applications and verified them as incomplete or invalid on their submitted information. That statement must accompany the zero-approval finding: the record is not merely a provider assertion accepted without claimed examination. The conclusion describes preparedness for a future qualifying request; its statement that no instance required application of the obligation cannot mean that no requests existed. Neither improper rejection nor successful data delivery is demonstrated by the public report. Application files, clarification/rejection reasons and the operative eligibility SOP would test those alternatives.</p>\n<p>The stated evidence includes public/internal documents, written attestations, interviews and substantive electronic-process testing. PDF296 names EV207 (the prior audit/implementation repository) and EV208 (a prior DSA audit report), with other entries confidential. Those are explicit prior-report references; they are not the complete basis and do not prove circular assurance. No individual applications, interview records, actual tests or audit workpapers were acquired. No applicant is identified as GDI or AI4TRUST.</p>\n<p>The [implementation report](http[local research file] PDF4, names FTI Consulting LLP as engaged by Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited. It dates adoption to29August2025 and audit work to5May-29August2025. FTI&#x27;s exact LLP identity is also visible in the audit footers. The evaluation period largely precedes the18June2025 commitments and entirely precedes Ankura&#x27;s23September appointment and full implementation after30September. This audit cannot establish performance under the first November2025 trustee cycle or the current2026 access system.</p>\n<p>Selected audit front matter describes conflict checks, noncontingent fees, independence and quality methods. These are the auditor&#x27;s declarations, not independently verified conflict or engagement records. Its stated absence of a single global quality-management policy is accompanied by segment/professional controls; it is not by itself proof of a deficient opinion. Provider implementation contents and closing improvement statements are not an independent validation of Article40 access. The report contains no Article40 section in the inspected contents; no full recommendation audit is claimed.</p>\n<p>The parallel trustee lane closed after13 indexed queries and two original HTML route captures. Its note correctly distinguishes required reports and permitted two-way auditor sharing from reports actually delivered and exchanges actually made. The current Commission AliExpress entry is a main-activity index, not a full docket. Ankura&#x27;s generic service page contains no case-specific findings and adds no proof of performed AliExpress work. Report confidentiality/recipient rules make private delivery plausible, but do not establish delivery, non-delivery or a Commission refusal to disclose. The2026 reporting cycle has not yet ended.</p>\n<h2 id=\"actual-root-reading\">Actual root reading</h2>\n<p>Commission index: AliExpress table rows and their actual audit/implementation links only. Audit text: PDF1,3-6,10-14,295-297; visual:295-296. Keyword locations on other pages are discovery only. Implementation text:PDF1-5,37; no visual or whole-report review. On continuation, audit295-297 and implementation4 were reread to verify the key result/date. Root also read the complete oversight note/manifest, scoped index derivative and Ankura substantive derivative; reused decision/appointment reading remains in the preceding accepted packet. Original and derivative custody is in root-captures.json and oversight-captures.json.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes\">What this changes</h2>\n<p>The administrative gate has a named operating owner: the provider&#x27;s Legal team, under the reported SOP. A positive access opinion can coexist with no delivered access when all requests are judged ineligible. That is a concrete mechanism for testing gatekeeping, not evidence by itself of obstruction. The best next public record is an actual request and reasoned response, preferably with the missing-information exchange; this connects the formal entitlement to the judgment that made it usable or unusable.</p>",
        "path": "ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09/root-audit-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-auditindex",
          "w33-con-s-audit",
          "w33-con-s-implementation"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed and root-reviewed 9 September 2026. This bounded lane acquired the Commission audit index and the linked AliExpress 2024/25 audit and implementation report. It inspected the public-data access obligation, selected audit identity/method/evidence passages, and report dates. It did not read all 365 audit pages or test the live system.\n\nThe FTI audit (see source references) PDF295-297, gives Article40(12) a positive conclusion with no recommendation. The explanation expressly concerns intention and capability. It describes a public application form, an SOP for evaluation/amendment/communication, Legal-team management, designated staff applying40(8)(b)-(e), and standardized approval/rejection/clarification emails. Approved access is described as DSA Ads, Items and Punishments datasets via dashboard and request-dependent API queries. This is the auditor's account of the process, not our exercised access.\n\nThe consequential observation is that no applications were approved during 1 July2024-30 June2025. The request count is redacted. The auditor says it inspected all applications and verified them as incomplete or invalid on their submitted information. That statement must accompany the zero-approval finding: the record is not merely a provider assertion accepted without claimed examination. The conclusion describes preparedness for a future qualifying request; its statement that no instance required application of the obligation cannot mean that no requests existed. Neither improper rejection nor successful data delivery is demonstrated by the public report. Application files, clarification/rejection reasons and the operative eligibility SOP would test those alternatives.\n\nThe stated evidence includes public/internal documents, written attestations, interviews and substantive electronic-process testing. PDF296 names EV207 (the prior audit/implementation repository) and EV208 (a prior DSA audit report), with other entries confidential. Those are explicit prior-report references; they are not the complete basis and do not prove circular assurance. No individual applications, interview records, actual tests or audit workpapers were acquired. No applicant is identified as GDI or AI4TRUST.\n\nThe implementation report (see source references) PDF4, names FTI Consulting LLP as engaged by Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited. It dates adoption to29August2025 and audit work to5May-29August2025. FTI's exact LLP identity is also visible in the audit footers. The evaluation period largely precedes the18June2025 commitments and entirely precedes Ankura's23September appointment and full implementation after30September. This audit cannot establish performance under the first November2025 trustee cycle or the current2026 access system.\n\nSelected audit front matter describes conflict checks, noncontingent fees, independence and quality methods. These are the auditor's declarations, not independently verified conflict or engagement records. Its stated absence of a single global quality-management policy is accompanied by segment/professional controls; it is not by itself proof of a deficient opinion. Provider implementation contents and closing improvement statements are not an independent validation of Article40 access. The report contains no Article40 section in the inspected contents; no full recommendation audit is claimed.\n\nThe parallel trustee lane closed after13 indexed queries and two original HTML route captures. Its note correctly distinguishes required reports and permitted two-way auditor sharing from reports actually delivered and exchanges actually made. The current Commission AliExpress entry is a main-activity index, not a full docket. Ankura's generic service page contains no case-specific findings and adds no proof of performed AliExpress work. Report confidentiality/recipient rules make private delivery plausible, but do not establish delivery, non-delivery or a Commission refusal to disclose. The2026 reporting cycle has not yet ended.\n\n## Actual root reading\n\nCommission index: AliExpress table rows and their actual audit/implementation links only. Audit text: PDF1,3-6,10-14,295-297; visual:295-296. Keyword locations on other pages are discovery only. Implementation text:PDF1-5,37; no visual or whole-report review. On continuation, audit295-297 and implementation4 were reread to verify the key result/date. Root also read the complete oversight note/manifest, scoped index derivative and Ankura substantive derivative; reused decision/appointment reading remains in the preceding accepted packet. Original and derivative custody is in root-captures.json and oversight-captures.json.\n\n## What this changes\n\nThe administrative gate has a named operating owner: the provider's Legal team, under the reported SOP. A positive access opinion can coexist with no delivered access when all requests are judged ineligible. That is a concrete mechanism for testing gatekeeping, not evidence by itself of obstruction. The best next public record is an actual request and reasoned response, preferably with the missing-information exchange; this connects the formal entitlement to the judgment that made it usable or unusable.\n",
        "file": "research/ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill",
        "title": "Fathom and California SB 813: verification authority and its limits",
        "description": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. Bounded instrument review following the whole-case review in forest-reviews.md. No canonical case changes. All obligations below describe the enrolled bill if enacted, not obligations already established by this bill.",
        "html": "<p>Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. Bounded instrument review following the whole-case review in forest-reviews.md. No canonical case changes. All obligations below describe the enrolled bill if enacted, not obligations already established by this bill.</p>\n<h2 id=\"instrument-level-result\">Instrument-level result</h2>\n<p>The advertised instrument is California SB 813 (McNerney), 2025–26 session. The official record shows passage by both houses on 30 August 2026 and enrollment on 1 September. As inspected on 9 September, its status is “Active Bill – Passed”; no governor approval or chapter entry appears. The senator’s 30 August release says it proceeds to the governor. The evidence supports passed/enrolled, pending enactment in the inspected record, rather than signed law. [Official status](http[local research file] [history](http[local research file] [author’s passage announcement](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The enrolled text creates a Government Operations Agency (GovOps) framework to qualify independent verification organizations (IVOs). It expressly does <strong>not</strong> require a developer, deployer or operator to engage an IVO or obtain a covered audit as a condition of developing, deploying or operating AI in California (§8898.4(a)(3)). A qualified evaluator is not a state endorsement of an AI model or system. The bill neither appoints Fathom nor makes an IVO a universal permission gate. [Enrolled text, §§8898–8898.4](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-would-decide-and-what-would-become-obligatory\">Who would decide, and what would become obligatory?</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Owner or participant</th>\n<th>Enrolled power or obligation</th>\n<th>Limit and exact locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>GovOps</td>\n<td>By 1 January 2028, establish application requirements, qualification criteria and procedures for suspending or terminating IVO designation. Publish requirements and criteria; review and revise them.</td>\n<td>§§8898.1(a)–(d), (f). The bill supplies considerations rather than a named vendor or fixed numerical certification benchmark. Actual implementing criteria remain future records.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GovOps selecting evaluators</td>\n<td>Consider risk-assessment expertise, metrics and methods, technical staffing, financial conflicts and operational independence. Applicants supply qualifications, proposed methods and supporting documentation.</td>\n<td>§8898.1(a), (c). An AI auditor may be a person, partnership, academic institution, nonprofit or corporation (§8898 definitions); the designation route is not limited to nonprofits.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GovOps supervising evaluators</td>\n<td>Develop suspension/termination procedures considering standards failures, material misrepresentation, conflicts, missing documentation, integrity/objectivity/competence and cybersecurity lapses.</td>\n<td>§8898.1(b). This concerns evaluator designation. The final text does not reproduce the old model-certification/decertification system.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Assessed party and evaluator</td>\n<td>Reasonable market-rate payment is allowed. Payment or its amount cannot depend on the assessment outcome. The evaluator must maintain operational and management independence, including freedom from assessed-party control over conclusions and recommendations.</td>\n<td>§8898.1(c)(2)(C)–(D). This permits an assessed-party-paid market subject to independence requirements; it does not establish an executed contract or actual fee schedule.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GovOps and advisory participants</td>\n<td>Consult relevant stakeholders as appropriate; convene working groups including engineers from competing AI companies and AI-safety experts; report findings to the Legislature.</td>\n<td>§8898.2. Advisory participation is not a private veto or an appointment of any named organization.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Designated IVO</td>\n<td>Beginning no sooner than 12 months after designation, report annually on methods/standards, relevant governance or funding changes and application changes. Retain unredacted reports for five years.</td>\n<td>§8898.3. Specified redactions protect trade secrets, security and other legally protected material, with justification where possible. Public reporting will not necessarily disclose all underlying material.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Developer, deployer or operator</td>\n<td>May choose whether to use this verification route.</td>\n<td>§8898.4(a)(3). The bill also does not require an IVO to perform covered compliance audits to register (§8898.4(a)(4)). This conclusion concerns SB 813, not duties imposed by other laws.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Court considering an audit</td>\n<td>An audit performed according to an identified standard may be relevant but is not conclusive in a harm proceeding.</td>\n<td>§8898.4(b). No affirmative defense or rebuttable presumption survives. Section 8898.4(a)(1) disclaims liability arising solely from failure to comply with a standard under this chapter.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Alternative compliance material matters: §8898.1(g)–(h) calls for practicable alignment with existing auditing standards and permits substantially similar reports, assessments, audits or assurance work when the agency’s requirements are met. That is not automatic interstate reciprocity or acceptance of every existing certificate. The complete enrolled text contains no bespoke appeal, reconsideration or hearing procedure. This does not establish that ordinary administrative or judicial remedies are unavailable; the future agency procedures and any applicable general law would need separate examination.</p>\n<h2 id=\"sponsorship-prospective-benefit-and-consequential-revisions\">Sponsorship, prospective benefit and consequential revisions</h2>\n<p>The senator’s 26 March 2025 announcement identifies Fathom as sponsoring through its advocacy arm Meridian. Fathom’s 31 August 2026 release claims that it sponsored, developed and championed the IVO approach. The latter is an organization’s account of its contribution, not independent proof that it wrote each clause or controlled revisions. The exact legal relationship between Fathom and Meridian was not resolved in this lane. [Author’s original announcement](http[local research file] [Fathom’s passage account](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The most revealing interest is documented in an official source: the Senate Judiciary analysis for the 29 April 2025 hearing identifies Fathom as sponsor and reports that it hoped to become a model review organization (MRO), p.1. On p.9 it attributes to the sponsor the assessment that only a handful of entities were qualified and that Fathom considered itself among them. This establishes a historical prospective-beneficiary interest. It does not establish a later designation, award, monopoly or successful attempt to control an assessment. [Judiciary analysis, pp.1 and 9](http[local research file]</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Version or decision</th>\n<th>Material rule or change</th>\n<th>Evidentiary boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>26 March 2025, official version 20250SB81398AMD</td>\n<td>Attorney General designation of MROs, renewable every three years; model/application certification could furnish an affirmative defense to specified personal-injury or property-damage liability, except intentional misconduct.</td>\n<td>Historical text, particularly old §8898.4. This stronger legal incentive is absent from the enrolled bill.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>29 April hearing; 1 May 2025 version 20250SB81397AMD</td>\n<td>Judiciary p.16 records author agreement to replace the affirmative defense with a rebuttable presumption. The 1 May text actually makes that replacement: certification could support presumed reasonable care, overcome by contrary admissible evidence.</td>\n<td>Proposal/acceptance and subsequent text are separately supported. Deleted and added markup was checked, rather than treating both as operative.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5 January 2026, official version 20250SB81396AMD</td>\n<td>Recasts the institutional structure and deletes the rebuttable presumption.</td>\n<td>Header/digest and the relevant deletion markup were read; this was not a complete audit of every January provision.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1 July 2026 committee hearing on 16 June text; 2 July version reflected in August Appropriations</td>\n<td>Intermediate seven-member commission, two levels of safety standards and dependencies involving AB 1405 and potentially AB 1709. Committee pp.14–15 report Encode’s request to distribute appointment authority and the author’s agreement to give appointments to the Speaker and Senate Rules.</td>\n<td>A concrete instance of accepted input, but the commission and these appointment rights do not survive in the enrolled framework. Neither referenced Assembly bill was separately investigated.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>26 August amendment; enrolled 1 September 2026</td>\n<td>GovOps qualification framework, express voluntary scope, audit relevant but not conclusive; no commission, two-tier scheme, affirmative defense or rebuttable presumption.</td>\n<td>Complete enrolled operative text read. Intermediate amendment dates for each individual deletion were not separately established.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Official historical texts are available through the [bill text page’s Version selector](http[local research file] An ordinary URL parameter did not change the selected version and was not used as historical evidence. Normal read-only form selection returned the verified historical headers and amendment markup.</p>\n<h2 id=\"contested-choices-and-fiscal-limits\">Contested choices and fiscal limits</h2>\n<p>The final Senate floor analysis, dated 30 August and based on the 26 August text, records Anthropic, Encode and Fathom in support and the Business Software Alliance (BSA) opposed. Anthropic supports evaluator designation while explicitly advocating additional work to require independently evaluated developer safeguards. That additional requirement is advocacy beyond this bill. BSA objects to premature implementation, evaluator competence safeguards, international alignment and the possibility that undefined standards in litigation could make nominally voluntary audits a practical expectation. The last point is a documented prediction of indirect pressure, not evidence that insurers, procurers or courts have already made certification mandatory. [Official analysis index, Senate Floor 30 August 2026, analysisId 405892, pp.5–7](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The Assembly floor analysis dated 27 August calls Fathom the sponsor and reproduces its strategic case for competitive advantage and a potential national de facto standard; that passage expressly concerns a previous version. It must not be silently restated as an operative legal requirement. Its fiscal comments say <strong>Unknown</strong>. [Same official index, Assembly Floor 27 August 2026, analysisId 405661, pp.2–3](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A material fiscal trap remains in the official packet. The 5 August Appropriations hearing analysis, based on the 2 July commission version, estimates costs in the tens of millions for that framework. The final Senate floor document still reproduces fiscal discussion of superseded AG/MRO, rebuttable-presumption and commission provisions. Those are not reliable estimates of the final GovOps bill. Report the latest Assembly estimate as unknown; no enacted appropriation, operational budget or actual fee revenue is established here. [Same index, Assembly Appropriations entry 3 August, hearing 5 August, analysisId 402751, pp.1–3; Senate Floor 30 August, pp.4–5](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-directional-relations\">Candidate directional relations</h2>\n<p>These are candidate assertions, not edits to the canonical graph.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate ID</th>\n<th>Direction and typed relation</th>\n<th>Date/state and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-fathom-sponsors-sb813</td>\n<td>Fathom → SB 813: sponsors legislative proposal</td>\n<td>Official author announcement, 26 March 2025; confirmed as sponsor in committee discussion. Sponsorship does not establish exclusive drafting or approval authority.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-fathom-prospective-mro</td>\n<td>Fathom → proposed MRO designation: expresses interest in becoming eligible operator</td>\n<td>Official Judiciary report of sponsor position, 29 April 2025, pp.1, 9. Historical aspiration, not appointment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-sb813-govops-designation</td>\n<td>Enrolled SB 813 → GovOps: would authorize evaluator qualification and suspension procedures</td>\n<td>Enrolled 1 September 2026; enactment not established. Final §§8898.1–8898.2.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-govops-ivo-conditions</td>\n<td>GovOps → applicant/designated IVO: would impose qualification, independence and reporting conditions</td>\n<td>Proposed statutory delegation; detailed implementing standards not yet established in this source packet.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-assessed-party-ivo-payment</td>\n<td>Assessed party → IVO: may pay reasonable market-rate assessment fees, without outcome contingency</td>\n<td>Enrolled §8898.1(c)(2)(C). Permitted transaction class, not observed payment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-encode-intermediate-appointments</td>\n<td>Encode → author’s intermediate commission amendment: requests shared appointment authority, reported accepted</td>\n<td>July committee analysis pp.14–15; superseded institution, no surviving current appointment right.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-bsa-voluntary-pressure-objection</td>\n<td>BSA → SB 813: objects that litigation treatment could create practical pressure for voluntary audits</td>\n<td>Final Senate floor pp.6–7, reported concern rather than demonstrated effect.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-sb813-voluntary-operation</td>\n<td>Enrolled SB 813 → AI developer/deployer/operator: preserves operation without this verification route</td>\n<td>§8898.4(a)(3), proposed law. Does not negate other statutory or contractual requirements.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-reading-scope\">Source custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p>Records were retrieved from their original publishers on 9 September 2026. The following hashes describe returned bodies inspected in memory; original bodies were <strong>not retained as separate local files</strong> in this lane. The official analysis PDFs are delivered by the index’s ordinary public form selectors, so the stable citation is the index plus dated entry, analysisId and PDF page. Hashes are corroborating retrieval identifiers, not a claim of locally preserved originals. No access restriction was bypassed.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record</th>\n<th>Scope actually read</th>\n<th>SHA-256 where recorded</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Enrolled official text, billTextClient.xhtml, published 1 September 2026 21:00</td>\n<td>Header/digest and complete §§8898–8898.4</td>\n<td>82a81fb20e59151762055d3c7461c3fbf5048ef7e1d92a58d4403b11a98bb646</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Official status and history pages</td>\n<td>Full bill-specific status/history, through enrollment</td>\n<td>Not recorded</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Author 26 March and 30 August announcements; Fathom 31 August account</td>\n<td>Complete substantive bill announcement bodies</td>\n<td>Not recorded</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Senate Judiciary PDF linked above</td>\n<td>pp.1–3, 8–11, 14–17; decisive pp.1, 9, 16</td>\n<td>Not recorded</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Official analysis index</td>\n<td>Dated entry list and public form selectors</td>\n<td>f04803891c081237681924f75aefdaf2192d5e98062f7f94fb47b482c95300f9</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Senate Floor, analysisId 405892, 30 August 2026</td>\n<td>All seven PDF pages</td>\n<td>c3ac5b1617aef0a3770742619d2d1f1b31f01856aa3c7e778ed4a44fc5cd8414</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Assembly Floor, analysisId 405661, 27 August 2026</td>\n<td>All three PDF pages</td>\n<td>5e1efe9e6b56496c8df63dda2337a382f87ef22a98b540c09d518039025fdd9f</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Assembly Appropriations, analysisId 402751, index 3 August/hearing 5 August</td>\n<td>All three PDF pages; header identifies 2 July version</td>\n<td>0571f9c79fdda04b6566173d2b5764ba2c4fc78a94dc587cfd62c9a30d2453c9</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection, analysisId 401958, index 30 June/hearing 1 July</td>\n<td>PDF pp.1, 10–23; header identifies 16 June version and proposed amendments. Earlier output for pp.2–9 was truncated and is not claimed read.</td>\n<td>6bb665073294fd314946d0d407cc30bfe51b618135e9c57fe9579755c0e942f3</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>26 March 2025 text, selector 20250SB81398AMD</td>\n<td>Header/digest and relevant designation/liability provisions</td>\n<td>46962fbb523a016c058f4a3f77271c877698b422af840a284735b8f987ced7bc</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1 May 2025 text, selector 20250SB81397AMD</td>\n<td>Header/digest and liability revision, including deletion/addition markup</td>\n<td>5cf00166a54d2d8267478b9844cb6c1ce908aa057d8dbd45917d2e3ca43cee3d</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5 January 2026 text, selector 20250SB81396AMD</td>\n<td>Header/digest and relevant provisions/deleted presumption markup</td>\n<td>1566fc7d12befdbc0789355b0025c5c39f5291592458eea2fff933d94f116a2f</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"stopping-point-and-discriminating-missing-records\">Stopping point and discriminating missing records</h2>\n<p>This instrument supports a recognized verification market with government selection and independence rules, alongside a documented historical sponsor interest in becoming a recognized operator. It does not establish compulsory private certification, a current Fathom designation or enacted state authority. An ordinary policy-development explanation remains strong: legislators revised a sponsored proposal, removed stronger liability protections and preserved a voluntary route while opponents continued to contest its consequences.</p>\n<p>The next records that could change this conclusion are a governor’s action/chapter record; adopted GovOps rules and actual designation decisions; and actual procurement, insurance, litigation or customer terms that condition participation on recognized verification. An application or decision naming Fathom would resolve prospective interest versus achieved status. A contract requiring an IVO audit would test indirect compulsion. No such record is established in this packet. Return to the whole-case review before opening those branches.</p>",
        "path": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09/fathom-bill.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-status",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-enrolled",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-judiciary",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-author",
          "w9-assure-s-sb813-floor"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. Bounded instrument review following the whole-case review in forest-reviews.md. No canonical case changes. All obligations below describe the enrolled bill if enacted, not obligations already established by this bill.\n\n## Instrument-level result\n\nThe advertised instrument is California SB 813 (McNerney), 2025–26 session. The official record shows passage by both houses on 30 August 2026 and enrollment on 1 September. As inspected on 9 September, its status is “Active Bill – Passed”; no governor approval or chapter entry appears. The senator’s 30 August release says it proceeds to the governor. The evidence supports passed/enrolled, pending enactment in the inspected record, rather than signed law. Official status (see source references) history (see source references) author’s passage announcement (see source references)\n\nThe enrolled text creates a Government Operations Agency (GovOps) framework to qualify independent verification organizations (IVOs). It expressly does **not** require a developer, deployer or operator to engage an IVO or obtain a covered audit as a condition of developing, deploying or operating AI in California (§8898.4(a)(3)). A qualified evaluator is not a state endorsement of an AI model or system. The bill neither appoints Fathom nor makes an IVO a universal permission gate. Enrolled text, §§8898–8898.4 (see source references)\n\n## Who would decide, and what would become obligatory?\n\n| Owner or participant | Enrolled power or obligation | Limit and exact locator |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| GovOps | By 1 January 2028, establish application requirements, qualification criteria and procedures for suspending or terminating IVO designation. Publish requirements and criteria; review and revise them. | §§8898.1(a)–(d), (f). The bill supplies considerations rather than a named vendor or fixed numerical certification benchmark. Actual implementing criteria remain future records. |\n| GovOps selecting evaluators | Consider risk-assessment expertise, metrics and methods, technical staffing, financial conflicts and operational independence. Applicants supply qualifications, proposed methods and supporting documentation. | §8898.1(a), (c). An AI auditor may be a person, partnership, academic institution, nonprofit or corporation (§8898 definitions); the designation route is not limited to nonprofits. |\n| GovOps supervising evaluators | Develop suspension/termination procedures considering standards failures, material misrepresentation, conflicts, missing documentation, integrity/objectivity/competence and cybersecurity lapses. | §8898.1(b). This concerns evaluator designation. The final text does not reproduce the old model-certification/decertification system. |\n| Assessed party and evaluator | Reasonable market-rate payment is allowed. Payment or its amount cannot depend on the assessment outcome. The evaluator must maintain operational and management independence, including freedom from assessed-party control over conclusions and recommendations. | §8898.1(c)(2)(C)–(D). This permits an assessed-party-paid market subject to independence requirements; it does not establish an executed contract or actual fee schedule. |\n| GovOps and advisory participants | Consult relevant stakeholders as appropriate; convene working groups including engineers from competing AI companies and AI-safety experts; report findings to the Legislature. | §8898.2. Advisory participation is not a private veto or an appointment of any named organization. |\n| Designated IVO | Beginning no sooner than 12 months after designation, report annually on methods/standards, relevant governance or funding changes and application changes. Retain unredacted reports for five years. | §8898.3. Specified redactions protect trade secrets, security and other legally protected material, with justification where possible. Public reporting will not necessarily disclose all underlying material. |\n| Developer, deployer or operator | May choose whether to use this verification route. | §8898.4(a)(3). The bill also does not require an IVO to perform covered compliance audits to register (§8898.4(a)(4)). This conclusion concerns SB 813, not duties imposed by other laws. |\n| Court considering an audit | An audit performed according to an identified standard may be relevant but is not conclusive in a harm proceeding. | §8898.4(b). No affirmative defense or rebuttable presumption survives. Section 8898.4(a)(1) disclaims liability arising solely from failure to comply with a standard under this chapter. |\n\nAlternative compliance material matters: §8898.1(g)–(h) calls for practicable alignment with existing auditing standards and permits substantially similar reports, assessments, audits or assurance work when the agency’s requirements are met. That is not automatic interstate reciprocity or acceptance of every existing certificate. The complete enrolled text contains no bespoke appeal, reconsideration or hearing procedure. This does not establish that ordinary administrative or judicial remedies are unavailable; the future agency procedures and any applicable general law would need separate examination.\n\n## Sponsorship, prospective benefit and consequential revisions\n\nThe senator’s 26 March 2025 announcement identifies Fathom as sponsoring through its advocacy arm Meridian. Fathom’s 31 August 2026 release claims that it sponsored, developed and championed the IVO approach. The latter is an organization’s account of its contribution, not independent proof that it wrote each clause or controlled revisions. The exact legal relationship between Fathom and Meridian was not resolved in this lane. Author’s original announcement (see source references) Fathom’s passage account (see source references)\n\nThe most revealing interest is documented in an official source: the Senate Judiciary analysis for the 29 April 2025 hearing identifies Fathom as sponsor and reports that it hoped to become a model review organization (MRO), p.1. On p.9 it attributes to the sponsor the assessment that only a handful of entities were qualified and that Fathom considered itself among them. This establishes a historical prospective-beneficiary interest. It does not establish a later designation, award, monopoly or successful attempt to control an assessment. Judiciary analysis, pp.1 and 9 (see source references)\n\n| Version or decision | Material rule or change | Evidentiary boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 26 March 2025, official version 20250SB81398AMD | Attorney General designation of MROs, renewable every three years; model/application certification could furnish an affirmative defense to specified personal-injury or property-damage liability, except intentional misconduct. | Historical text, particularly old §8898.4. This stronger legal incentive is absent from the enrolled bill. |\n| 29 April hearing; 1 May 2025 version 20250SB81397AMD | Judiciary p.16 records author agreement to replace the affirmative defense with a rebuttable presumption. The 1 May text actually makes that replacement: certification could support presumed reasonable care, overcome by contrary admissible evidence. | Proposal/acceptance and subsequent text are separately supported. Deleted and added markup was checked, rather than treating both as operative. |\n| 5 January 2026, official version 20250SB81396AMD | Recasts the institutional structure and deletes the rebuttable presumption. | Header/digest and the relevant deletion markup were read; this was not a complete audit of every January provision. |\n| 1 July 2026 committee hearing on 16 June text; 2 July version reflected in August Appropriations | Intermediate seven-member commission, two levels of safety standards and dependencies involving AB 1405 and potentially AB 1709. Committee pp.14–15 report Encode’s request to distribute appointment authority and the author’s agreement to give appointments to the Speaker and Senate Rules. | A concrete instance of accepted input, but the commission and these appointment rights do not survive in the enrolled framework. Neither referenced Assembly bill was separately investigated. |\n| 26 August amendment; enrolled 1 September 2026 | GovOps qualification framework, express voluntary scope, audit relevant but not conclusive; no commission, two-tier scheme, affirmative defense or rebuttable presumption. | Complete enrolled operative text read. Intermediate amendment dates for each individual deletion were not separately established. |\n\nOfficial historical texts are available through the bill text page’s Version selector (see source references) An ordinary URL parameter did not change the selected version and was not used as historical evidence. Normal read-only form selection returned the verified historical headers and amendment markup.\n\n## Contested choices and fiscal limits\n\nThe final Senate floor analysis, dated 30 August and based on the 26 August text, records Anthropic, Encode and Fathom in support and the Business Software Alliance (BSA) opposed. Anthropic supports evaluator designation while explicitly advocating additional work to require independently evaluated developer safeguards. That additional requirement is advocacy beyond this bill. BSA objects to premature implementation, evaluator competence safeguards, international alignment and the possibility that undefined standards in litigation could make nominally voluntary audits a practical expectation. The last point is a documented prediction of indirect pressure, not evidence that insurers, procurers or courts have already made certification mandatory. Official analysis index, Senate Floor 30 August 2026, analysisId 405892, pp.5–7 (see source references)\n\nThe Assembly floor analysis dated 27 August calls Fathom the sponsor and reproduces its strategic case for competitive advantage and a potential national de facto standard; that passage expressly concerns a previous version. It must not be silently restated as an operative legal requirement. Its fiscal comments say **Unknown**. Same official index, Assembly Floor 27 August 2026, analysisId 405661, pp.2–3 (see source references)\n\nA material fiscal trap remains in the official packet. The 5 August Appropriations hearing analysis, based on the 2 July commission version, estimates costs in the tens of millions for that framework. The final Senate floor document still reproduces fiscal discussion of superseded AG/MRO, rebuttable-presumption and commission provisions. Those are not reliable estimates of the final GovOps bill. Report the latest Assembly estimate as unknown; no enacted appropriation, operational budget or actual fee revenue is established here. Same index, Assembly Appropriations entry 3 August, hearing 5 August, analysisId 402751, pp.1–3; Senate Floor 30 August, pp.4–5 (see source references)\n\n## Candidate directional relations\n\nThese are candidate assertions, not edits to the canonical graph.\n\n| Candidate ID | Direction and typed relation | Date/state and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| assurance-fathom-sponsors-sb813 | Fathom → SB 813: sponsors legislative proposal | Official author announcement, 26 March 2025; confirmed as sponsor in committee discussion. Sponsorship does not establish exclusive drafting or approval authority. |\n| assurance-fathom-prospective-mro | Fathom → proposed MRO designation: expresses interest in becoming eligible operator | Official Judiciary report of sponsor position, 29 April 2025, pp.1, 9. Historical aspiration, not appointment. |\n| assurance-sb813-govops-designation | Enrolled SB 813 → GovOps: would authorize evaluator qualification and suspension procedures | Enrolled 1 September 2026; enactment not established. Final §§8898.1–8898.2. |\n| assurance-govops-ivo-conditions | GovOps → applicant/designated IVO: would impose qualification, independence and reporting conditions | Proposed statutory delegation; detailed implementing standards not yet established in this source packet. |\n| assurance-assessed-party-ivo-payment | Assessed party → IVO: may pay reasonable market-rate assessment fees, without outcome contingency | Enrolled §8898.1(c)(2)(C). Permitted transaction class, not observed payment. |\n| assurance-encode-intermediate-appointments | Encode → author’s intermediate commission amendment: requests shared appointment authority, reported accepted | July committee analysis pp.14–15; superseded institution, no surviving current appointment right. |\n| assurance-bsa-voluntary-pressure-objection | BSA → SB 813: objects that litigation treatment could create practical pressure for voluntary audits | Final Senate floor pp.6–7, reported concern rather than demonstrated effect. |\n| assurance-sb813-voluntary-operation | Enrolled SB 813 → AI developer/deployer/operator: preserves operation without this verification route | §8898.4(a)(3), proposed law. Does not negate other statutory or contractual requirements. |\n\n## Source custody and reading scope\n\nRecords were retrieved from their original publishers on 9 September 2026. The following hashes describe returned bodies inspected in memory; original bodies were **not retained as separate local files** in this lane. The official analysis PDFs are delivered by the index’s ordinary public form selectors, so the stable citation is the index plus dated entry, analysisId and PDF page. Hashes are corroborating retrieval identifiers, not a claim of locally preserved originals. No access restriction was bypassed.\n\n| Record | Scope actually read | SHA-256 where recorded |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Enrolled official text, billTextClient.xhtml, published 1 September 2026 21:00 | Header/digest and complete §§8898–8898.4 | 82a81fb20e59151762055d3c7461c3fbf5048ef7e1d92a58d4403b11a98bb646 |\n| Official status and history pages | Full bill-specific status/history, through enrollment | Not recorded |\n| Author 26 March and 30 August announcements; Fathom 31 August account | Complete substantive bill announcement bodies | Not recorded |\n| Senate Judiciary PDF linked above | pp.1–3, 8–11, 14–17; decisive pp.1, 9, 16 | Not recorded |\n| Official analysis index | Dated entry list and public form selectors | f04803891c081237681924f75aefdaf2192d5e98062f7f94fb47b482c95300f9 |\n| Senate Floor, analysisId 405892, 30 August 2026 | All seven PDF pages | c3ac5b1617aef0a3770742619d2d1f1b31f01856aa3c7e778ed4a44fc5cd8414 |\n| Assembly Floor, analysisId 405661, 27 August 2026 | All three PDF pages | 5e1efe9e6b56496c8df63dda2337a382f87ef22a98b540c09d518039025fdd9f |\n| Assembly Appropriations, analysisId 402751, index 3 August/hearing 5 August | All three PDF pages; header identifies 2 July version | 0571f9c79fdda04b6566173d2b5764ba2c4fc78a94dc587cfd62c9a30d2453c9 |\n| Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection, analysisId 401958, index 30 June/hearing 1 July | PDF pp.1, 10–23; header identifies 16 June version and proposed amendments. Earlier output for pp.2–9 was truncated and is not claimed read. | 6bb665073294fd314946d0d407cc30bfe51b618135e9c57fe9579755c0e942f3 |\n| 26 March 2025 text, selector 20250SB81398AMD | Header/digest and relevant designation/liability provisions | 46962fbb523a016c058f4a3f77271c877698b422af840a284735b8f987ced7bc |\n| 1 May 2025 text, selector 20250SB81397AMD | Header/digest and liability revision, including deletion/addition markup | 5cf00166a54d2d8267478b9844cb6c1ce908aa057d8dbd45917d2e3ca43cee3d |\n| 5 January 2026 text, selector 20250SB81396AMD | Header/digest and relevant provisions/deleted presumption markup | 1566fc7d12befdbc0789355b0025c5c39f5291592458eea2fff933d94f116a2f |\n\n## Stopping point and discriminating missing records\n\nThis instrument supports a recognized verification market with government selection and independence rules, alongside a documented historical sponsor interest in becoming a recognized operator. It does not establish compulsory private certification, a current Fathom designation or enacted state authority. An ordinary policy-development explanation remains strong: legislators revised a sponsored proposal, removed stronger liability protections and preserved a voluntary route while opponents continued to contest its consequences.\n\nThe next records that could change this conclusion are a governor’s action/chapter record; adopted GovOps rules and actual designation decisions; and actual procurement, insurance, litigation or customer terms that condition participation on recognized verification. An application or decision naming Fathom would resolve prospective interest versus achieved status. A contract requiring an IVO audit would test indirect compulsion. No such record is established in this packet. Return to the whole-case review before opening those branches.\n",
        "file": "research/assurance-wave-2026-09-09-fathom-bill.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors",
        "title": "G7 minors instruments: assurance commitments, privacy limits and the missing compulsory gate",
        "description": "Instrument-level finding for forest review. Observed 9 September 2026. Read the current forest-reviews.md before acquisition. Only this note was written; no canonical graph, automation, other branch or publication was changed.",
        "html": "<p>Instrument-level finding for forest review. Observed 9 September 2026. Read the current forest-reviews.md before acquisition. Only this note was written; no canonical graph, automation, other branch or publication was changed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"result\">Result</h2>\n<p>The 2026 G7 texts politically endorse age assurance, including for conversational AI, but the inspected instruments do not themselves create a universal identity requirement, a named certification monopoly or an enforceable market-entry condition. A concrete compulsory gate appears in <strong>5Rights&#x27; response as a demand for future policy</strong>: certification before affected products reach the market. That demand is not an adopted provision of these G7 texts.</p>\n<p>There is also a direct institutional counterweight to broad identification: the G7 privacy authorities subsequently reference the ministers&#x27; agreement and oppose using age assurance for identification, tracking, profiling or monitoring. This is expressed guidance, not evidence that every implementation complies. The most discriminating next record is an actual implementation instrument that assigns the access decision and specifies its legal basis, methods, override and redress.</p>\n<h2 id=\"instruments-exact-scope-and-authority\">Instruments, exact scope and authority</h2>\n<p><strong>G1: Ministers&#x27; Common Set of Principles, English, three pages.</strong> Principle1 calls for reliable, proportionate, rights-respecting, privacy-preserving and interoperable age assurance, using minimally intrusive feasible means. It connects assurance both to age-appropriate experiences and to restrictions under applicable law; it permits parental consent where needed. Principles3/6 likewise refer to current legal obligations. Section4 leaves jurisdictions their own implementation approaches and asks providers to develop practical measures with stakeholders. Principle7 promotes shared evidence and impartial risk assessment. It names no verification vendor, certification scheme or technical standard. It does not specify passports, biometrics, real names, exact birth dates, age-estimation methods or a universal check at every visit. “Anonymity” is not explicit. The source uses the umbrella term age assurance; its French translation&#x27;s use of vérification does not supply an otherwise absent identity-document requirement. [Official English PDF](http[local research file] PDF1 Principle1; PDF2 Principles3–4; PDF3 Principles6–7/§4. [Official French translation](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>G2: Leaders&#x27; Call, 17 June, three pages.</strong> Its opening defines the protected population as under18; that is not an across-the-board minimum access age. PDF2 bullet1 asks providers to apply age assurance consistently with national circumstances and applicable frameworks. Bullet2 specifically calls for default protections for conversational AI, including parental tools and age assurance. Bullet4 uses mandatory wording about detecting/removing CSAM and criminal NCII, while grounding prohibitions in national legal frameworks. PDF3 asks ministers to meet regularly and assess progress by year-end. The call supports common assessment methods without naming their authors/operators. No sanction schedule, compliance adjudicator, certification condition, prescribed identifier, authentication protocol or implementation commencement date appears. <a>English original hosted by Germany&#x27;s federal government</a>.</p>\n<p>The legal boundary follows from these operative provisions: the statements articulate joint policy and expectations, while domestic law supplies any compulsory access restriction. Treating the word “must” inside this leaders&#x27; call as a newly enacted transnational offence would bypass the missing legal mechanism. Conversely, calling the texts merely empty rhetoric would miss their explicit direction to providers, research coordination and ministerial review. This inquiry establishes neither a newly enforceable G7-wide gate nor the absence of gates already created elsewhere.</p>\n<p><strong>G3: G7 privacy-authorities statement, adopted 25–26 June in Paris.</strong> Paragraph3 explicitly references the ministers&#x27; agreement. Paragraphs2/4 favor context-specific use and warn against indiscriminate application. Paragraph7(2) says assurance should not enable identification, tracking, profiling or monitoring; results should not be repurposed. Paragraph7(3) limits collection/use/retention; other provisions address proportionality, security, transparency and design. Paragraph6 names ISO27566 alongside EDPB, FTC/COPPA, Canadian OPC and a joint international statement. It takes note of these resources, rather than requiring ISO certification or endorsing a supplier. Paragraph7(8) commits to further exchange and regulator engagement. No individual enforcement decision or audited deployment is established here. This is a separate regulators&#x27; instrument, not a clause silently added to G1/G2. [OPC-hosted original](http[local research file] all numbered paragraphs; page modified8July2026.</p>\n<h2 id=\"attributable-input-and-the-demand-that-exceeds-the-adopted-text\">Attributable input and the demand that exceeds the adopted text</h2>\n<p><strong>G4: UNICEF&#x27;s 1 June statement</strong> says it supplied ministers with global evidence before the meetings. It calls for publication and delivery of an agreed implementation plan with timelines/accountability. This is an attributable claim of input, not the submitted evidence package, a government acknowledgment of particular wording, or the plan itself. Its appeal to convert principles into company obligations is also informative about the implementation gap. No inspected original allocates a UNICEF approval/veto right. [UNICEF original](http[local research file] paragraph beginning “With over100million,” and deputy executive director&#x27;s comment.</p>\n<p><strong>G5: 5Rights&#x27; 17 June response</strong> welcomes the call but criticizes its reliance on digital literacy, parental controls and content removal. Leanda Barrington-Leach demands premarket safety certification for digital products/services likely to be used by or affect children. That is a concrete proposed market-access condition, but the response neither identifies a selected certifier nor demonstrates adoption. Its assertion of industry influence is advocacy interpretation; no company submission or negotiated edit is supplied to establish that causal attribution. [5Rights original](http[local research file] International Affairs Team, paragraph preceding Barrington-Leach&#x27;s quotation and the quotation itself.</p>\n<p>No named NGO appears in the operative G1/G2 texts. UNICEF&#x27;s claimed evidence provision is stronger than shared vocabulary, but weaker than clause-level uptake. 5Rights&#x27; reaction supplies an explicit example of divergence between an advocate&#x27;s desired control mechanism and the actual outcome. Do not create an adopted-certification or industry-authored-clause edge from either account.</p>\n<h2 id=\"dates-and-source-ancestry\">Dates and source ancestry</h2>\n<p><strong>29 May political agreement versus17June document export:</strong> the contemporaneous UK DSIT announcement says ministers agreed the shared principles at that day&#x27;s Paris meeting. It places possible UK under16 restrictions in a then-closed domestic consultation, not inside the G7 agreement. [UK original](http[local research file] published29May, opening paragraphs. UNICEF&#x27;s1June statement independently dates its response before the summit. G3 explicitly dates the ministerial declaration&#x27;s adoption to29May.</p>\n<p>The currently served G1 English PDF has17June creation/modification metadata; its French counterpart is explicitly marked translation17June. These are current official-hosted copies of the ministerial principles, not demonstrated archival bytes from29May. The English PDF&#x27;s Word-author field says “LEPESQUEUX Marine”; G2&#x27;s says “Warda OUZEMMAL.” Such fields may identify an export account or editor and do not prove substantive authorship or approval authority. No personal identity/author-control node should be created from them. Exact draft changes between May and June remain untested.</p>\n<p>G2 is the later leaders&#x27; call, which welcomes the ministers&#x27; principles. It must not be merged with them as a single document. The French translation and German-hosted English G2 are counterparts, not independent corroboration of who drafted it. G3 is subsequent explicit reference/qualification by a different group of officials. These three document identities matter more than the shared G7 label.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-typed-relations-for-parent-integration\">Candidate typed relations for parent integration</h2>\n<p>IDs are provisional. Reuse existing organization IDs; no canonical merge performed.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate</th>\n<th>Relation</th>\n<th>Evidence state / action stage</th>\n<th>Important boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e1</td>\n<td>G7 digital ministers → G1: adopt shared principles</td>\n<td>G1 plus contemporaneous UK account; documented statement / adopted29May</td>\n<td>Current PDF bytes exported17June</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e2</td>\n<td>G7 leaders → G1: welcome ministerial principles</td>\n<td>G2 PDF2/3; documented / adopted policy statement17June</td>\n<td>No new domestic statute</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e3</td>\n<td>G7 leaders → conversational-AI providers: call for age assurance/default protections</td>\n<td>G2 PDF2 second bullet; documented / recommendation</td>\n<td>No chosen method, vendor or compulsory universal identity gate</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e4</td>\n<td>G7 leaders → digital ministers: request continuing meetings/year-end assessment</td>\n<td>G2 PDF3; documented / announced review obligation within political process</td>\n<td>No evidence review has occurred</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e5</td>\n<td>G7 privacy authorities → G1: expressly reference/qualify assurance implementation</td>\n<td>G3 §§3–7; documented / adopted guidance25–26June</td>\n<td>Not an enforcement order or proven technical safeguard</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e6</td>\n<td>G7 privacy authorities → ISO27566: note framework</td>\n<td>G3 §6; documented / reference</td>\n<td>Not mandatory certification or vendor accreditation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e7</td>\n<td>UNICEF → digital ministers: reports providing advance evidence</td>\n<td>G4; reported / claimed completed input</td>\n<td>Original package, recipient receipt and clause uptake absent</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>assurance-g7-e8</td>\n<td>5Rights → governments: demands premarket safety certification</td>\n<td>G5; documented advocacy / proposed condition</td>\n<td>Absent from inspected adopted text; operator unspecified</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"high-value-gap-and-stopping-point\">High-value gap and stopping point</h2>\n<p>The decisive instrument is the implementation plan UNICEF calls agreed, together with any adopted country-specific rule or platform implementation notice giving it effect. The test is concrete: covered service; trigger; required evidence; decision-maker; discretion to refuse or override; legal source; privacy restrictions; appeal and enforcement. A copy of the plan, approval minutes and task assignments would reveal whether this remains coordinated encouragement or becomes a compulsory condition. This note does not infer that a plan must contain all those elements or that it has already been enacted.</p>\n<p>For provenance, requestable holder records would be UNICEF&#x27;s transmitted evidence and recipient acknowledgment, negotiating drafts, and the French presidency&#x27;s/digital ministers&#x27; plan and review papers. No outreach occurred. Public searches for the specific implementation plan and NGO input returned UNICEF&#x27;s claim and 5Rights&#x27; reaction, but no plan or attributable adopted clause. Existing independent domestic policy histories remain a plausible explanation for convergent language.</p>\n<p>Acquisition stops at this instrument-level comparison. Newly surfaced Franco-German digital-majority/European blueprint material, commercial webinars and national legal implementation leads were not followed; a new branch awaits the root&#x27;s forest assessment. Closed UN/UNESCO routes were not retried.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-receipt\">Acquisition receipt</h2>\n<p>All links are public primary publisher/government records, read9September2026. G1English, G1French and G2English were fetched by ordinary HTTPGET and parsed with pypdf; all three pages of G1English and G2English were read. G1French was read to check counterpart terminology/date and substantive provisions. G2French, G3 and G4/G5 substantive bodies were read in the web reader; UK opening/digital-policy paragraphs were read. Whole-text term checks supplemented, but did not replace, reading. No page-image interpretation is asserted. Only this note was retained; hashes below identify response bytes inspected in memory and are not claims of saved original-file custody.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record</th>\n<th>HTTP200 bytes</th>\n<th>SHA-256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>G1English</td>\n<td>66352</td>\n<td><code>51bcee69d5c81c5b2f158d615f9e46df10c729a24e7febaaf895fa6c27e04837</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>G1French</td>\n<td>274724</td>\n<td><code>fe9359a6ce62ed632928391a73d75ecbd769411203b8c14a6c2e0291ac00bde1</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>G2English</td>\n<td>280787</td>\n<td><code>f2d7945c33bf7d071fab8e7c7d121580a0feeae615663efe1fad8f96301110b8</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>G2French</td>\n<td>182453</td>\n<td><code>8cbd67ec475162fc4e1672050027dc7ac590cbaeb2c40f9f4a06e71b771f53a0</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>G3OPC</td>\n<td>24336</td>\n<td><code>b2cbc1ad8ec83200c432f648d3c2fe6df69a31a75cb606ec78c13911b7ec392c</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>G4UNICEF</td>\n<td>204863</td>\n<td><code>641e56d9998ef8fd7f452ebf97d05ddc0b2c2c6aa3d9a5a1244171e942f08f13</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>G5FiveRights</td>\n<td>189556</td>\n<td><code>b752297563c8579c318caabacc5b14fd57ac615fc2554697c4c3757f2251c3fb</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>UKDSIT</td>\n<td>78902</td>\n<td><code>3a0352a7169f7c697dc69d4b3b8e1fd4d12cc60e042e2702dab008a479e9457e</code></td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>",
        "path": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09/g7-minors.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-g7-principles",
          "w9-assure-s-g7-leaders",
          "w9-assure-s-g7-privacy",
          "w9-assure-s-g7-unicef",
          "w9-assure-s-g7-5rights",
          "w9-assure-s-g7-uk"
        ],
        "markdown": "Instrument-level finding for forest review. Observed 9 September 2026. Read the current forest-reviews.md before acquisition. Only this note was written; no canonical graph, automation, other branch or publication was changed.\n\n## Result\n\nThe 2026 G7 texts politically endorse age assurance, including for conversational AI, but the inspected instruments do not themselves create a universal identity requirement, a named certification monopoly or an enforceable market-entry condition. A concrete compulsory gate appears in **5Rights' response as a demand for future policy**: certification before affected products reach the market. That demand is not an adopted provision of these G7 texts.\n\nThere is also a direct institutional counterweight to broad identification: the G7 privacy authorities subsequently reference the ministers' agreement and oppose using age assurance for identification, tracking, profiling or monitoring. This is expressed guidance, not evidence that every implementation complies. The most discriminating next record is an actual implementation instrument that assigns the access decision and specifies its legal basis, methods, override and redress.\n\n## Instruments, exact scope and authority\n\n**G1: Ministers' Common Set of Principles, English, three pages.** Principle1 calls for reliable, proportionate, rights-respecting, privacy-preserving and interoperable age assurance, using minimally intrusive feasible means. It connects assurance both to age-appropriate experiences and to restrictions under applicable law; it permits parental consent where needed. Principles3/6 likewise refer to current legal obligations. Section4 leaves jurisdictions their own implementation approaches and asks providers to develop practical measures with stakeholders. Principle7 promotes shared evidence and impartial risk assessment. It names no verification vendor, certification scheme or technical standard. It does not specify passports, biometrics, real names, exact birth dates, age-estimation methods or a universal check at every visit. “Anonymity” is not explicit. The source uses the umbrella term age assurance; its French translation's use of vérification does not supply an otherwise absent identity-document requirement. Official English PDF (see source references) PDF1 Principle1; PDF2 Principles3–4; PDF3 Principles6–7/§4. Official French translation (see source references)\n\n**G2: Leaders' Call, 17 June, three pages.** Its opening defines the protected population as under18; that is not an across-the-board minimum access age. PDF2 bullet1 asks providers to apply age assurance consistently with national circumstances and applicable frameworks. Bullet2 specifically calls for default protections for conversational AI, including parental tools and age assurance. Bullet4 uses mandatory wording about detecting/removing CSAM and criminal NCII, while grounding prohibitions in national legal frameworks. PDF3 asks ministers to meet regularly and assess progress by year-end. The call supports common assessment methods without naming their authors/operators. No sanction schedule, compliance adjudicator, certification condition, prescribed identifier, authentication protocol or implementation commencement date appears. English original hosted by Germany's federal government.\n\nThe legal boundary follows from these operative provisions: the statements articulate joint policy and expectations, while domestic law supplies any compulsory access restriction. Treating the word “must” inside this leaders' call as a newly enacted transnational offence would bypass the missing legal mechanism. Conversely, calling the texts merely empty rhetoric would miss their explicit direction to providers, research coordination and ministerial review. This inquiry establishes neither a newly enforceable G7-wide gate nor the absence of gates already created elsewhere.\n\n**G3: G7 privacy-authorities statement, adopted 25–26 June in Paris.** Paragraph3 explicitly references the ministers' agreement. Paragraphs2/4 favor context-specific use and warn against indiscriminate application. Paragraph7(2) says assurance should not enable identification, tracking, profiling or monitoring; results should not be repurposed. Paragraph7(3) limits collection/use/retention; other provisions address proportionality, security, transparency and design. Paragraph6 names ISO27566 alongside EDPB, FTC/COPPA, Canadian OPC and a joint international statement. It takes note of these resources, rather than requiring ISO certification or endorsing a supplier. Paragraph7(8) commits to further exchange and regulator engagement. No individual enforcement decision or audited deployment is established here. This is a separate regulators' instrument, not a clause silently added to G1/G2. OPC-hosted original (see source references) all numbered paragraphs; page modified8July2026.\n\n## Attributable input and the demand that exceeds the adopted text\n\n**G4: UNICEF's 1 June statement** says it supplied ministers with global evidence before the meetings. It calls for publication and delivery of an agreed implementation plan with timelines/accountability. This is an attributable claim of input, not the submitted evidence package, a government acknowledgment of particular wording, or the plan itself. Its appeal to convert principles into company obligations is also informative about the implementation gap. No inspected original allocates a UNICEF approval/veto right. UNICEF original (see source references) paragraph beginning “With over100million,” and deputy executive director's comment.\n\n**G5: 5Rights' 17 June response** welcomes the call but criticizes its reliance on digital literacy, parental controls and content removal. Leanda Barrington-Leach demands premarket safety certification for digital products/services likely to be used by or affect children. That is a concrete proposed market-access condition, but the response neither identifies a selected certifier nor demonstrates adoption. Its assertion of industry influence is advocacy interpretation; no company submission or negotiated edit is supplied to establish that causal attribution. 5Rights original (see source references) International Affairs Team, paragraph preceding Barrington-Leach's quotation and the quotation itself.\n\nNo named NGO appears in the operative G1/G2 texts. UNICEF's claimed evidence provision is stronger than shared vocabulary, but weaker than clause-level uptake. 5Rights' reaction supplies an explicit example of divergence between an advocate's desired control mechanism and the actual outcome. Do not create an adopted-certification or industry-authored-clause edge from either account.\n\n## Dates and source ancestry\n\n**29 May political agreement versus17June document export:** the contemporaneous UK DSIT announcement says ministers agreed the shared principles at that day's Paris meeting. It places possible UK under16 restrictions in a then-closed domestic consultation, not inside the G7 agreement. UK original (see source references) published29May, opening paragraphs. UNICEF's1June statement independently dates its response before the summit. G3 explicitly dates the ministerial declaration's adoption to29May.\n\nThe currently served G1 English PDF has17June creation/modification metadata; its French counterpart is explicitly marked translation17June. These are current official-hosted copies of the ministerial principles, not demonstrated archival bytes from29May. The English PDF's Word-author field says “LEPESQUEUX Marine”; G2's says “Warda OUZEMMAL.” Such fields may identify an export account or editor and do not prove substantive authorship or approval authority. No personal identity/author-control node should be created from them. Exact draft changes between May and June remain untested.\n\nG2 is the later leaders' call, which welcomes the ministers' principles. It must not be merged with them as a single document. The French translation and German-hosted English G2 are counterparts, not independent corroboration of who drafted it. G3 is subsequent explicit reference/qualification by a different group of officials. These three document identities matter more than the shared G7 label.\n\n## Candidate typed relations for parent integration\n\nIDs are provisional. Reuse existing organization IDs; no canonical merge performed.\n\n| Candidate | Relation | Evidence state / action stage | Important boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| assurance-g7-e1 | G7 digital ministers → G1: adopt shared principles | G1 plus contemporaneous UK account; documented statement / adopted29May | Current PDF bytes exported17June |\n| assurance-g7-e2 | G7 leaders → G1: welcome ministerial principles | G2 PDF2/3; documented / adopted policy statement17June | No new domestic statute |\n| assurance-g7-e3 | G7 leaders → conversational-AI providers: call for age assurance/default protections | G2 PDF2 second bullet; documented / recommendation | No chosen method, vendor or compulsory universal identity gate |\n| assurance-g7-e4 | G7 leaders → digital ministers: request continuing meetings/year-end assessment | G2 PDF3; documented / announced review obligation within political process | No evidence review has occurred |\n| assurance-g7-e5 | G7 privacy authorities → G1: expressly reference/qualify assurance implementation | G3 §§3–7; documented / adopted guidance25–26June | Not an enforcement order or proven technical safeguard |\n| assurance-g7-e6 | G7 privacy authorities → ISO27566: note framework | G3 §6; documented / reference | Not mandatory certification or vendor accreditation |\n| assurance-g7-e7 | UNICEF → digital ministers: reports providing advance evidence | G4; reported / claimed completed input | Original package, recipient receipt and clause uptake absent |\n| assurance-g7-e8 | 5Rights → governments: demands premarket safety certification | G5; documented advocacy / proposed condition | Absent from inspected adopted text; operator unspecified |\n\n## High-value gap and stopping point\n\nThe decisive instrument is the implementation plan UNICEF calls agreed, together with any adopted country-specific rule or platform implementation notice giving it effect. The test is concrete: covered service; trigger; required evidence; decision-maker; discretion to refuse or override; legal source; privacy restrictions; appeal and enforcement. A copy of the plan, approval minutes and task assignments would reveal whether this remains coordinated encouragement or becomes a compulsory condition. This note does not infer that a plan must contain all those elements or that it has already been enacted.\n\nFor provenance, requestable holder records would be UNICEF's transmitted evidence and recipient acknowledgment, negotiating drafts, and the French presidency's/digital ministers' plan and review papers. No outreach occurred. Public searches for the specific implementation plan and NGO input returned UNICEF's claim and 5Rights' reaction, but no plan or attributable adopted clause. Existing independent domestic policy histories remain a plausible explanation for convergent language.\n\nAcquisition stops at this instrument-level comparison. Newly surfaced Franco-German digital-majority/European blueprint material, commercial webinars and national legal implementation leads were not followed; a new branch awaits the root's forest assessment. Closed UN/UNESCO routes were not retried.\n\n## Acquisition receipt\n\nAll links are public primary publisher/government records, read9September2026. G1English, G1French and G2English were fetched by ordinary HTTPGET and parsed with pypdf; all three pages of G1English and G2English were read. G1French was read to check counterpart terminology/date and substantive provisions. G2French, G3 and G4/G5 substantive bodies were read in the web reader; UK opening/digital-policy paragraphs were read. Whole-text term checks supplemented, but did not replace, reading. No page-image interpretation is asserted. Only this note was retained; hashes below identify response bytes inspected in memory and are not claims of saved original-file custody.\n\n| Record | HTTP200 bytes | SHA-256 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| G1English | 66352 | `51bcee69d5c81c5b2f158d615f9e46df10c729a24e7febaaf895fa6c27e04837` |\n| G1French | 274724 | `fe9359a6ce62ed632928391a73d75ecbd769411203b8c14a6c2e0291ac00bde1` |\n| G2English | 280787 | `f2d7945c33bf7d071fab8e7c7d121580a0feeae615663efe1fad8f96301110b8` |\n| G2French | 182453 | `8cbd67ec475162fc4e1672050027dc7ac590cbaeb2c40f9f4a06e71b771f53a0` |\n| G3OPC | 24336 | `b2cbc1ad8ec83200c432f648d3c2fe6df69a31a75cb606ec78c13911b7ec392c` |\n| G4UNICEF | 204863 | `641e56d9998ef8fd7f452ebf97d05ddc0b2c2c6aa3d9a5a1244171e942f08f13` |\n| G5FiveRights | 189556 | `b752297563c8579c318caabacc5b14fd57ac615fc2554697c4c3757f2251c3fb` |\n| UKDSIT | 78902 | `3a0352a7169f7c697dc69d4b3b8e1fd4d12cc60e042e2702dab008a479e9457e` |\n",
        "file": "research/assurance-wave-2026-09-09-g7-minors.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund",
        "title": "Multi-agent safety fund: public instrument pass",
        "description": "Observed 2026-09-09. The required whole-case review in forest-reviews.md was read before this pass. Only this file was written; no canonical case changes. Research stops here pending the root's whole-case reassessment.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 2026-09-09. The required whole-case review in <code>forest-reviews.md</code> was read before this pass. Only this file was written; no canonical case changes. Research stops here pending the root&#x27;s whole-case reassessment.</p>\n<p>The documentary mechanism is a jointly considered research competition with differentiated award conditions. It gives the supporting parties a way to choose research and attach conditions to their awards. It does not establish regulatory authority, a deployed admission gate, paid partner shares, or a common body controlling all AI agents. The clearest new instrument is the call-specific FAQ&#x27;s optional Google.org funding route; public announcement wording alone conceals that distinction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"amount-parties-administration-and-timing\">Amount, parties, administration and timing</h2>\n<p>Google DeepMind&#x27;s own announcement, dated 11 June 2026, describes a worldwide technical-research fund of <strong>up to US$10 million</strong> alongside Schmidt Sciences, ARIA and CAIF, supported by Google.org. It expects awardees in autumn 2026. This is an advertised ceiling, not evidence of an executed US$10 million grant or money received. The page discloses neither partner amounts nor payment dates. [DeepMind announcement](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>CAIF&#x27;s announcement likewise uses the ceiling. Its article displays 11 June 2026, while the site&#x27;s listing showed 16 July 2026; retain the conflict rather than invent a second launch. CAIF&#x27;s foundation page marked applications closed when inspected. Its footer identifies charity 1201294 and company 13485176. Neither page identifies the joint fund as a separate legal entity. [CAIF announcement](http[local research file] [foundation page](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The Schmidt-branded application portal and Schmidt contact establish an administrative front door. They do not establish Schmidt as sole grantor. Named brands, particularly Google.org and Google DeepMind, should not be silently substituted for an award&#x27;s contracting legal entity. No executed award or contribution agreement was acquired. [Actual application portal](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"public-call-and-selection\">Public call and selection</h2>\n<p>The portal offers Tier 1 awards up to US$300,000 and Tier 2 awards of US$300,000–1 million for 1–2 years. Its selection criteria cover agenda fit, scientific rigour, impact, philanthropic fit, feasibility, expertise and cost. Joint supporting parties consider applications; selected funders may add limitations or guidance, agreed in final award documents. Lobbying, legislative influence and political activity are excluded. Schmidt-funded indirect costs are capped at 10%.</p>\n<p>The portal table gives <strong>9 August 2026, 11:59pm AoE</strong>, consistent with its UI&#x27;s <strong>10 August, 07:59am EDT</strong>. The announcements instead say 8 August AoE. No acquired change history explains the one-day difference. Opening is shown as 11 June. This preserves observed versions without asserting why the deadline changed. [Portal, Timeline, Funding Levels, Eligibility and Selection Criteria](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"call-linked-faq-differentiated-award-conditions\">Call-linked FAQ: differentiated award conditions</h2>\n<p>The FAQ is linked directly from the application portal. These are public descriptions of intended conditions, not an acquired executed agreement.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Route / issue</th>\n<th>Terms disclosed</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Eligibility</td>\n<td>Charitable/scientific/educational recipients; commercial participants cannot lead. Independent researchers need an eligible host or fiscal sponsor before funding. Schmidt uses NGOsource for non-US equivalency.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Schmidt funding</td>\n<td>Annual gifts/grants depend on progress and reporting; subsequent years are not assured. IP normally stays with awardees unless the agreement says otherwise.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Google.org option</td>\n<td>Applicants may opt out and remain eligible for Schmidt, ARIA and CAIF consideration. Google.org-funded code/inventions require Apache 2.0; other specified IP requires CC-BY 4.0, within three months. Remaining IP rights go into the public domain; patent applications are prohibited. Data must be freely searchable, subject to privacy law. Funded projects must comply with Google AI Principles.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Limits</td>\n<td>Conditional renewal is not a demonstrated termination power over already-paid funds. Neither this FAQ nor the inspected call identifies reviewers, recusal rules, voting shares, publication-approval procedures or executed allocations.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Locators: export lines 9–22 eligibility; 55–75 funding and international administration; 101–103 IP; 105–121 Google funding conditions. The FAQ includes some general Schmidt wording referring to approximately three years; the specific call says 1–2 years, which governs the duration reported here. [Call FAQ](http[local research file] [public text export inspected](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The linked Google principles currently address innovation, responsible development/deployment and collaboration, including human oversight, safety testing, privacy and intellectual property. The call FAQ does not identify a dated edition, change-control rule, dispute process or a party&#x27;s exclusive interpretation right. Reading this webpage does not supply those missing contractual terms. [Google AI Principles, substantive principles and implementation sections](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"generic-policies-kept-separate\">Generic policies kept separate</h2>\n<p>Schmidt&#x27;s general FAQ identifies <strong>Schmidt Sciences LLC</strong>, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit subsidiary of <strong>The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation</strong>. The displayed EIN 46-3460261 belongs to that parent; it must not be assigned to the LLC. General overhead policy permits none without written agreement; where allowed, the normal ceiling is 10%. Thus the call&#x27;s cap is not an automatic entitlement. Its general policy also discusses protected enterprise AI use during proposal processing; this is not proof that AI evaluated this competition. These are organization-wide policies, not acquired award clauses. [Schmidt general FAQ, organization, indirect-cost and AI-use questions](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>No separate ARIA announcement or award agreement assigning its contribution was acquired in this pass. ARIA&#x27;s separate Scaling Trust programme amounts must not be treated as its share of this joint call. Nor does listing Google DeepMind as a joint supporting party establish that it supplies cash separately from Google.org.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-agenda-can-and-cannot-show\">What the agenda can and cannot show</h2>\n<p>Schmidt explicitly credits DeepMind&#x27;s Distributional AGI Safety work, ARIA&#x27;s Scaling Trust thesis and CAIF&#x27;s Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI report as inspirations. The agenda includes identity/authentication, admission controls, proof of agent/human credentials, platform vetting and revocation as research topics. It prioritizes strengthening existing infrastructure partly because incumbent protocols may become entrenched. These are concrete agenda choices relevant to the assurance inquiry.</p>\n<p>Counterevidence matters: the programme excludes commercial product development, purely nontechnical policy work, and solutions that depend on one privileged principal controlling every agent. It funds research on coordination among independently controlled agents; an identity research topic is not a universal identity requirement. No acquired record selects an operational gatekeeper or compels deployment. [Schmidt research agenda, introductory inspirations, Agent Infrastructure and Out of Scope](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-reading-scope\">Source custody and reading scope</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Actual scope inspected / state</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>CAIF foundation</td>\n<td>Scoped current-call block and footer; web reader. No whole-site knowledge claimed.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CAIF announcement</td>\n<td>Full 72-line web rendering, including displayed date, amounts, named parties and timetable.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DeepMind announcement</td>\n<td>Full substantive announcement in 160-line web rendering; navigation not used as evidence.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Schmidt portal</td>\n<td>All substantive public call text through selection criteria in a 268-line rendering; second copy of the body is duplicate page output. No private application submitted or applicant account entered.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Call-specific FAQ</td>\n<td>Entire public text export read, 14,895 bytes, HTTP 200, text/plain UTF-8. Export SHA-256: <code>aa91f1a4a06b83602f38639e5711e1d3412f1ea947f5371699fddc43d7a16c94</code>. Public document UI yielded a JavaScript shell; ordinary public export succeeded as the single substitute. Bytes were read in memory and are <strong>not retained as an original file</strong>. No publication/revision date visible. Line locators refer to this exact export.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Schmidt agenda</td>\n<td>Substantive programme introduction, agenda, research topics and exclusions. The alternate <code>/scaling-ai-safety-for-a-multi-agent-world/</code> page substantially repeats the agenda; it is not an independent witness.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Schmidt general FAQ</td>\n<td>Organization identity, indirect-cost and AI-use sections. Generic policy scope retained.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Google AI Principles</td>\n<td>Substantive principles and implementation sections, web lines 124–169. Current linked text only; no historical incorporated version inferred.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Web renderings are inspected source views, not locally preserved originals; no original-file hashes are invented for them. Public webinar links were identified but their recordings were not watched. Closed CAIF accounts and other prior blocked routes were not reopened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"narrow-integration-and-stopping-point\">Narrow integration and stopping point</h2>\n<p>Suitable relations are: the named parties <strong>jointly consider applications</strong> under this call; Schmidt <strong>hosts the application front door</strong>; Google.org <strong>offers a conditional funding route</strong>; applicants <strong>can decline that route without leaving the competition</strong>; the agenda <strong>attributes inspiration to three named research programmes/documents</strong>. Each belongs to the research-funding layer. Do not convert these into paid amounts, veto rights, government endorsement of findings, operational authority or donor instructions over a particular result.</p>\n<p>The next decisive records are the <strong>joint selection/conflicts protocol</strong>, the <strong>contribution or administration agreement identifying contracting entities and committed shares</strong>, and an <strong>award-specific agreement plus disbursement record</strong>. Schmidt&#x27;s programme administrator is the likely first custodian of the selection process; each actual award&#x27;s grantor and recipient would hold its conditions and receipts. These are record targets only: no outreach, further branch or acquisition follows this pass before the whole-case reassessment.</p>",
        "path": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09/multiagent-fund.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fund-deepmind",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-caif",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-portal",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-faq",
          "w9-assure-s-fund-agenda",
          "w9-assure-s-schmidt-faq",
          "w9-assure-s-google-principles"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 2026-09-09. The required whole-case review in `forest-reviews.md` was read before this pass. Only this file was written; no canonical case changes. Research stops here pending the root's whole-case reassessment.\n\nThe documentary mechanism is a jointly considered research competition with differentiated award conditions. It gives the supporting parties a way to choose research and attach conditions to their awards. It does not establish regulatory authority, a deployed admission gate, paid partner shares, or a common body controlling all AI agents. The clearest new instrument is the call-specific FAQ's optional Google.org funding route; public announcement wording alone conceals that distinction.\n\n## Amount, parties, administration and timing\n\nGoogle DeepMind's own announcement, dated 11 June 2026, describes a worldwide technical-research fund of **up to US$10 million** alongside Schmidt Sciences, ARIA and CAIF, supported by Google.org. It expects awardees in autumn 2026. This is an advertised ceiling, not evidence of an executed US$10 million grant or money received. The page discloses neither partner amounts nor payment dates. DeepMind announcement (see source references)\n\nCAIF's announcement likewise uses the ceiling. Its article displays 11 June 2026, while the site's listing showed 16 July 2026; retain the conflict rather than invent a second launch. CAIF's foundation page marked applications closed when inspected. Its footer identifies charity 1201294 and company 13485176. Neither page identifies the joint fund as a separate legal entity. CAIF announcement (see source references) foundation page (see source references)\n\nThe Schmidt-branded application portal and Schmidt contact establish an administrative front door. They do not establish Schmidt as sole grantor. Named brands, particularly Google.org and Google DeepMind, should not be silently substituted for an award's contracting legal entity. No executed award or contribution agreement was acquired. Actual application portal (see source references)\n\n## Public call and selection\n\nThe portal offers Tier 1 awards up to US$300,000 and Tier 2 awards of US$300,000–1 million for 1–2 years. Its selection criteria cover agenda fit, scientific rigour, impact, philanthropic fit, feasibility, expertise and cost. Joint supporting parties consider applications; selected funders may add limitations or guidance, agreed in final award documents. Lobbying, legislative influence and political activity are excluded. Schmidt-funded indirect costs are capped at 10%.\n\nThe portal table gives **9 August 2026, 11:59pm AoE**, consistent with its UI's **10 August, 07:59am EDT**. The announcements instead say 8 August AoE. No acquired change history explains the one-day difference. Opening is shown as 11 June. This preserves observed versions without asserting why the deadline changed. Portal, Timeline, Funding Levels, Eligibility and Selection Criteria (see source references)\n\n## Call-linked FAQ: differentiated award conditions\n\nThe FAQ is linked directly from the application portal. These are public descriptions of intended conditions, not an acquired executed agreement.\n\n| Route / issue | Terms disclosed |\n| --- | --- |\n| Eligibility | Charitable/scientific/educational recipients; commercial participants cannot lead. Independent researchers need an eligible host or fiscal sponsor before funding. Schmidt uses NGOsource for non-US equivalency. |\n| Schmidt funding | Annual gifts/grants depend on progress and reporting; subsequent years are not assured. IP normally stays with awardees unless the agreement says otherwise. |\n| Google.org option | Applicants may opt out and remain eligible for Schmidt, ARIA and CAIF consideration. Google.org-funded code/inventions require Apache 2.0; other specified IP requires CC-BY 4.0, within three months. Remaining IP rights go into the public domain; patent applications are prohibited. Data must be freely searchable, subject to privacy law. Funded projects must comply with Google AI Principles. |\n| Limits | Conditional renewal is not a demonstrated termination power over already-paid funds. Neither this FAQ nor the inspected call identifies reviewers, recusal rules, voting shares, publication-approval procedures or executed allocations. |\n\nLocators: export lines 9–22 eligibility; 55–75 funding and international administration; 101–103 IP; 105–121 Google funding conditions. The FAQ includes some general Schmidt wording referring to approximately three years; the specific call says 1–2 years, which governs the duration reported here. Call FAQ (see source references) public text export inspected (see source references)\n\nThe linked Google principles currently address innovation, responsible development/deployment and collaboration, including human oversight, safety testing, privacy and intellectual property. The call FAQ does not identify a dated edition, change-control rule, dispute process or a party's exclusive interpretation right. Reading this webpage does not supply those missing contractual terms. Google AI Principles, substantive principles and implementation sections (see source references)\n\n## Generic policies kept separate\n\nSchmidt's general FAQ identifies **Schmidt Sciences LLC**, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit subsidiary of **The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation**. The displayed EIN 46-3460261 belongs to that parent; it must not be assigned to the LLC. General overhead policy permits none without written agreement; where allowed, the normal ceiling is 10%. Thus the call's cap is not an automatic entitlement. Its general policy also discusses protected enterprise AI use during proposal processing; this is not proof that AI evaluated this competition. These are organization-wide policies, not acquired award clauses. Schmidt general FAQ, organization, indirect-cost and AI-use questions (see source references)\n\nNo separate ARIA announcement or award agreement assigning its contribution was acquired in this pass. ARIA's separate Scaling Trust programme amounts must not be treated as its share of this joint call. Nor does listing Google DeepMind as a joint supporting party establish that it supplies cash separately from Google.org.\n\n## What the agenda can and cannot show\n\nSchmidt explicitly credits DeepMind's Distributional AGI Safety work, ARIA's Scaling Trust thesis and CAIF's Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI report as inspirations. The agenda includes identity/authentication, admission controls, proof of agent/human credentials, platform vetting and revocation as research topics. It prioritizes strengthening existing infrastructure partly because incumbent protocols may become entrenched. These are concrete agenda choices relevant to the assurance inquiry.\n\nCounterevidence matters: the programme excludes commercial product development, purely nontechnical policy work, and solutions that depend on one privileged principal controlling every agent. It funds research on coordination among independently controlled agents; an identity research topic is not a universal identity requirement. No acquired record selects an operational gatekeeper or compels deployment. Schmidt research agenda, introductory inspirations, Agent Infrastructure and Out of Scope (see source references)\n\n## Source custody and reading scope\n\n| Source | Actual scope inspected / state |\n| --- | --- |\n| CAIF foundation | Scoped current-call block and footer; web reader. No whole-site knowledge claimed. |\n| CAIF announcement | Full 72-line web rendering, including displayed date, amounts, named parties and timetable. |\n| DeepMind announcement | Full substantive announcement in 160-line web rendering; navigation not used as evidence. |\n| Schmidt portal | All substantive public call text through selection criteria in a 268-line rendering; second copy of the body is duplicate page output. No private application submitted or applicant account entered. |\n| Call-specific FAQ | Entire public text export read, 14,895 bytes, HTTP 200, text/plain UTF-8. Export SHA-256: `aa91f1a4a06b83602f38639e5711e1d3412f1ea947f5371699fddc43d7a16c94`. Public document UI yielded a JavaScript shell; ordinary public export succeeded as the single substitute. Bytes were read in memory and are **not retained as an original file**. No publication/revision date visible. Line locators refer to this exact export. |\n| Schmidt agenda | Substantive programme introduction, agenda, research topics and exclusions. The alternate `/scaling-ai-safety-for-a-multi-agent-world/` page substantially repeats the agenda; it is not an independent witness. |\n| Schmidt general FAQ | Organization identity, indirect-cost and AI-use sections. Generic policy scope retained. |\n| Google AI Principles | Substantive principles and implementation sections, web lines 124–169. Current linked text only; no historical incorporated version inferred. |\n\nWeb renderings are inspected source views, not locally preserved originals; no original-file hashes are invented for them. Public webinar links were identified but their recordings were not watched. Closed CAIF accounts and other prior blocked routes were not reopened.\n\n## Narrow integration and stopping point\n\nSuitable relations are: the named parties **jointly consider applications** under this call; Schmidt **hosts the application front door**; Google.org **offers a conditional funding route**; applicants **can decline that route without leaving the competition**; the agenda **attributes inspiration to three named research programmes/documents**. Each belongs to the research-funding layer. Do not convert these into paid amounts, veto rights, government endorsement of findings, operational authority or donor instructions over a particular result.\n\nThe next decisive records are the **joint selection/conflicts protocol**, the **contribution or administration agreement identifying contracting entities and committed shares**, and an **award-specific agreement plus disbursement record**. Schmidt's programme administrator is the likely first custodian of the selection process; each actual award's grantor and recipient would hold its conditions and receipts. These are record targets only: no outreach, further branch or acquisition follows this pass before the whole-case reassessment.\n",
        "file": "research/assurance-wave-2026-09-09-multiagent-fund.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
        "title": "Assurance markets: implementation and incentives",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Scope: Fathom public strategy, workshop reports and evaluation-industry interviews. The California instrument is separately assessed in fathom-bill.md.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Scope: Fathom public strategy, workshop reports and evaluation-industry interviews. The California instrument is separately assessed in fathom-bill.md.</p>\n<p>Fathom explicitly seeks legislation to create demand for an independent AI-verification market. Its model combines public outcome requirements, accredited private evaluation and legal/commercial benefits for passing products. Its philanthropy-only funding description is self-report, not a completed donor audit. Source: http[local research file] (substantive approach read).</p>\n<p>The 16 March Paris workshop account describes a February 2026 IASEAI event and Gillian Hadfield keynote. Its published full report contains a simulation, not an executed regulatory arrangement. PDF pages 9-11 identify unresolved revocation/appeal rights, transparency versus proprietary methods, and incentives when developers pay evaluators. Participants explicitly compare this to credit-rating failures: limited verifier competition can make revocation difficult; government, evaluator and developer can shift responsibility between themselves. The report also records participants who thought the structure improved responses to harm. These are organizer-reported simulation findings, not evidence of an actual cover-up, crisis operation or captured regulator. Sources: http[local research file] and http[local research file] . Landing page substantive body read; PDF targeted pages 9-11 plus scoped extraction of other sections. Original retained with hash in originals-manifest.json; extraction contains spaced lettering.</p>\n<p>Ashby2026 connects voluntary verification to insurance pricing, coverage and liability, explicitly describing these as incentives for uptake. Its children workshop proposes an independent AI-rating institution with access to proprietary developer data; it acknowledges unresolved age-verification/First Amendment tensions. Its separate fraud workshop advocates identity verification and cross-sector data exchange at high-risk interactions. These are workshop proposals, not established institutions or a single operational identity system. Read PDF pages 8-10 and relevant extracted sections. Sources: http[local research file] and http[local research file] . Original retained, hash in manifest. Do not infer participants endorsed every proposal or reproduce unsourced factual claims inside the report.</p>\n<p>The 21 July evaluator article interviews Rumman Chowdhury of Humane Intelligence PBC, Shea Brown of BABL AI and Patrick Sullivan of A-LIGN. It identifies test design, access rights, commercial relationships and comparability as unresolved practical issues, advocating professional standards, accreditation, independent oversight and liability insurance. Interviewed aspirations are not adopted industry rules. The PBC must not be silently merged with the similarly named nonprofit on a partnership roster. Source: http[local research file] (full substantive article read; landing http[local research file] is same source family).</p>\n<h2 id=\"whole-case-implication\">Whole-case implication</h2>\n<p>There is a concrete economic mechanism worth investigating: a formally optional certificate can become commercially difficult to avoid if insurers, procurement officers or litigants rely on it. This is a supported design intention and an open implementation question. Actual policy endorsements, procurement clauses, insurer schedules and declined-coverage decisions would establish whether it operates, by whose standards and with what contestability. We have not acquired those instruments in this run. Public-interest conviction, market-building and an institution&#x27;s desire for a role can coexist. None alone demonstrates illicit control.</p>",
        "path": "assurance-wave-2026-09-09/root-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w9-assure-s-fathom-approach",
          "w9-assure-s-paris-report",
          "w9-assure-s-ashby-report"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Scope: Fathom public strategy, workshop reports and evaluation-industry interviews. The California instrument is separately assessed in fathom-bill.md.\n\nFathom explicitly seeks legislation to create demand for an independent AI-verification market. Its model combines public outcome requirements, accredited private evaluation and legal/commercial benefits for passing products. Its philanthropy-only funding description is self-report, not a completed donor audit. Source: http[local research file] (substantive approach read).\n\nThe 16 March Paris workshop account describes a February 2026 IASEAI event and Gillian Hadfield keynote. Its published full report contains a simulation, not an executed regulatory arrangement. PDF pages 9-11 identify unresolved revocation/appeal rights, transparency versus proprietary methods, and incentives when developers pay evaluators. Participants explicitly compare this to credit-rating failures: limited verifier competition can make revocation difficult; government, evaluator and developer can shift responsibility between themselves. The report also records participants who thought the structure improved responses to harm. These are organizer-reported simulation findings, not evidence of an actual cover-up, crisis operation or captured regulator. Sources: http[local research file] and http[local research file] . Landing page substantive body read; PDF targeted pages 9-11 plus scoped extraction of other sections. Original retained with hash in originals-manifest.json; extraction contains spaced lettering.\n\nAshby2026 connects voluntary verification to insurance pricing, coverage and liability, explicitly describing these as incentives for uptake. Its children workshop proposes an independent AI-rating institution with access to proprietary developer data; it acknowledges unresolved age-verification/First Amendment tensions. Its separate fraud workshop advocates identity verification and cross-sector data exchange at high-risk interactions. These are workshop proposals, not established institutions or a single operational identity system. Read PDF pages 8-10 and relevant extracted sections. Sources: http[local research file] and http[local research file] . Original retained, hash in manifest. Do not infer participants endorsed every proposal or reproduce unsourced factual claims inside the report.\n\nThe 21 July evaluator article interviews Rumman Chowdhury of Humane Intelligence PBC, Shea Brown of BABL AI and Patrick Sullivan of A-LIGN. It identifies test design, access rights, commercial relationships and comparability as unresolved practical issues, advocating professional standards, accreditation, independent oversight and liability insurance. Interviewed aspirations are not adopted industry rules. The PBC must not be silently merged with the similarly named nonprofit on a partnership roster. Source: http[local research file] (full substantive article read; landing http[local research file] is same source family).\n\n## Whole-case implication\n\nThere is a concrete economic mechanism worth investigating: a formally optional certificate can become commercially difficult to avoid if insurers, procurement officers or litigants rely on it. This is a supported design intention and an open implementation question. Actual policy endorsements, procurement clauses, insurer schedules and declined-coverage decisions would establish whether it operates, by whose standards and with what contestability. We have not acquired those instruments in this run. Public-interest conviction, market-building and an institution's desire for a role can coexist. None alone demonstrates illicit control.\n",
        "file": "research/assurance-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings",
        "title": "Encryption-guidance origins: funding, review access and the missing wording record",
        "description": "The new evidence identifies a funded research route and a real toolkit consultation process. It does not identify the person or organisation that supplied eSafety's encrypted-environment recommendations. This lane made no canonical case edits, outreach or public submissions.",
        "html": "<p>The new evidence identifies a funded research route and a real toolkit consultation process. It does not identify the person or organisation that supplied eSafety&#x27;s encrypted-environment recommendations. This lane made no canonical case edits, outreach or public submissions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-cited-report-supports\">What the cited report supports</h2>\n<p>The toolkit labelled <code>v 4 March 2026</code>&#x27;s printed24/PDF13 places footnote29 immediately after its homomorphic-encryption item. The full list has seven items: client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based E2EE deployment, conditional encryption limits, interventions, signal-based detection and limiting viral spread. All are framed as approaches industry should consider. Footnote34 elsewhere supports SaferAI-related investigative triage and cannot provide ancestry for this list.</p>\n<p>The footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report <strong>Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse</strong>, by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes <em>Security and Safety, vol.4</em>. That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.</p>\n<p>The report&#x27;s actual relevant content is more discriminating than a keyword absence. P34 discusses offenders moving to end-to-end encrypted messaging. The toolkit accurately points to that page separately in footnote26, printed22/PDF12. P28 warns that protective interventions can enable surveillance harmful to children&#x27;s rights; pp50-51 call for proportionate assessment across rights, including privacy, and consultation with technologists and other experts. No homomorphic-encryption recommendation or technical support was identified in the scoped reading or exact-phrase search. This establishes an unresolved support gap for that specific technical claim. It does not establish that the report never discusses encryption, that eSafety&#x27;s claim is technically false, or that the whole list originates with the report.</p>\n<p>The first prefix search for <code>encrypt</code> returned no hits, but full-word <code>encryption</code> found a bibliography entry and reading p34 found encrypted messaging. Prefix absence was therefore not used as evidence. The UNICEF2020 encryption paper cited at reportp57 was not read or promoted into a new origin claim.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-funded-and-contributed\">Who funded and contributed</h2>\n<p>Reportp5 identifies the research as part of <strong>Toolbox for Measuring Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse</strong>, funded through <strong>REPHRAIN&#x27;s fourth Strategic Funding Call</strong>. It identifies UKRI as REPHRAIN&#x27;s funder. P8 says Amy Orben of Cambridge led the project and this report is work package3. The current DFC project page independently documents the publisher&#x27;s account of project funding and participating institutions; it shares project ancestry with the report and is not an independent audit of the money.</p>\n<p>The report&#x27;s back cover separately acknowledges <strong>5Rights Foundation funding of the DFC centre</strong>, describing DFC as a joint LSE/5Rights research centre. Centre support is not evidence of a report-specific earmark. No amount, disbursement, grant conditions, manuscript-approval right or publication veto was acquired.</p>\n<p>P5 names <strong>Mariesa Nicholas, Australian e-Safety Commissioner&#x27;s Office</strong>, among four independent peer reviewers, alongside Hazel Bitaña, Michael Salter and Fabio Senne. This establishes named review participation and contemporaneous institutional affiliation. It does not establish current employment, the substance of her comments, corporate endorsement, or authorship of the toolkit&#x27;s encryption sentences. The six cover authors remain named authors without allocating particular passages to individuals.</p>\n<h2 id=\"released-correspondence-supplies-a-specific-drafting-route\">Released correspondence supplies a specific drafting route</h2>\n<p>The official <strong>eSafety FOI25139 / LOG118</strong> document set contains a May2025 industry consultation chain. The consequential readable record is <strong>Document19, PDF29-31</strong>, which preserves the 5May invitation and a 16May response from an @x.com correspondent. The invitation says the toolkit had been developed since the December2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop, using workshop insights. Its draft core-content list already includes end-to-end encryption and AI. That establishes the subject&#x27;s presence in a May2025 draft outline, not the four particular recommendations or a December2024 version of those sentences.</p>\n<p>The email identifies <strong>AttachmentA, draft core content</strong>, and <strong>AttachmentB, practical tools</strong>, seeks feedback with particular attention to B, offers marked-up written edits or a 20May online discussion, and announces another opportunity for final-draft redlines before a then-anticipated September launch. These are offered process steps, not proof every step occurred. The sender signs as eSafety&#x27;s Industry Insights and Enablement Team.</p>\n<p>X&#x27;s 16May reply says it has no additional feedback and looks forward to publication. This establishes draft review access and that particular response. It does not show X supplied wording, approved the final2026 text or had no other communications. The draft attachment bodies and any comment-disposition records were not acquired. Doc13&#x27;s first page was incompletely exposed by the reader, so this result relies on the repeated invitation in Doc19 rather than pretending the whole original email was read there. Redacted names were not reconstructed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-separating-observation\">The separating observation</h2>\n<p>The best next record is now concrete: <strong>May2025 AttachmentA and AttachmentB, the final-draft redlines, comment dispositions, footnote29 source entry and publication clearance</strong>, held by eSafety&#x27;s toolkit team. These would identify when the encrypted-environment language entered the draft, which participant suggested or amended it, and whether footnote29 was an editing error, indirect principle citation, or intended to point somewhere else. A participant-specific insertion and accepted comment would establish textual influence; a pre-existing paragraph with an editorial citation error would support ordinary drafting/citation failure instead.</p>\n<p>For the money route, the complementary record is the REPHRAIN fourth-call award and work-package budget. That can distinguish ordinary research funding from deliverable-specific approval rights. For the reviewer route, DFC&#x27;s invitation, comments and author response can distinguish access from substantive changes. Neither inquiry can be replaced by general biographies or shared affiliations.</p>\n<h2 id=\"provenance-and-limits\">Provenance and limits</h2>\n<p>Read/capture occurred 8September2026 America/Chicago, after midnight9SeptemberUTC. The original researchonline PDF GET returned403; no retry. The public eprints cached reader supplied scoped report text. The original FOI PDF GET timed out after20seconds; no retry. Two publisher pages were retained as original HTTP200 bodies. The three PDF reading extracts have derivative hashes in <strong>encryption-capture-manifest.json</strong> and are not represented as original PDFs.</p>\n<p>The 5Rights launch is dated4December2024 and links a <code>/126219/1/</code> file; eSafety links <code>/126219/3/</code>. The <code>/1/</code> reader failed and was not retried. The numeric path components are recorded as different file locators, not authenticated version numbers; no byte or revision comparison is claimed. Repository metadata records deposit3December2024 and published-version status. Screenshot calls did not yield an image available for inspection here, so footnote placement and the title comparison are grounded in parsed original-page text plus repository metadata, with no visual-verification claim.</p>\n<p>The candidate is structurally separate from case-r8. Context nodes retain existing IDs. New records use <code>w5-enc</code>. The toolkit label is retained literally; the exact publication day is not independently established. The fresh toolkit source is another scoped observation of the same official document, not independent corroboration of its technical assertions.</p>\n<p>Source URLs: [Report](http[local research file] [LSE metadata](http[local research file] [DFC project](http[local research file] [5Rights launch](http[local research file] [eSafety toolkit](http[local research file] [released FOI correspondence](http[local research file]</p>",
        "path": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08/encryption-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-paper",
          "w5-enc-s-record",
          "w5-enc-s-dfc",
          "w5-enc-s-launch"
        ],
        "markdown": "The new evidence identifies a funded research route and a real toolkit consultation process. It does not identify the person or organisation that supplied eSafety's encrypted-environment recommendations. This lane made no canonical case edits, outreach or public submissions.\n\n## What the cited report supports\n\nThe toolkit labelled `v 4 March 2026`'s printed24/PDF13 places footnote29 immediately after its homomorphic-encryption item. The full list has seven items: client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption, risk-based E2EE deployment, conditional encryption limits, interventions, signal-based detection and limiting viral spread. All are framed as approaches industry should consider. Footnote34 elsewhere supports SaferAI-related investigative triage and cannot provide ancestry for this list.\n\nThe footnote29 URL points to the 61-page December2024 report **Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse**, by Anri van der Spuy, Sabine Witting, Patrick Burton, Emma Day, Sonia Livingstone and Kim R. Sylwander. The report cover and p61 citation identify a Digital Futures for Children centre publication; the LSE repository calls it a technical report. The toolkit citation instead includes *Security and Safety, vol.4*. That is a bibliographic discrepancy, not yet proof of an incorrectly linked document.\n\nThe report's actual relevant content is more discriminating than a keyword absence. P34 discusses offenders moving to end-to-end encrypted messaging. The toolkit accurately points to that page separately in footnote26, printed22/PDF12. P28 warns that protective interventions can enable surveillance harmful to children's rights; pp50-51 call for proportionate assessment across rights, including privacy, and consultation with technologists and other experts. No homomorphic-encryption recommendation or technical support was identified in the scoped reading or exact-phrase search. This establishes an unresolved support gap for that specific technical claim. It does not establish that the report never discusses encryption, that eSafety's claim is technically false, or that the whole list originates with the report.\n\nThe first prefix search for `encrypt` returned no hits, but full-word `encryption` found a bibliography entry and reading p34 found encrypted messaging. Prefix absence was therefore not used as evidence. The UNICEF2020 encryption paper cited at reportp57 was not read or promoted into a new origin claim.\n\n## Who funded and contributed\n\nReportp5 identifies the research as part of **Toolbox for Measuring Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse**, funded through **REPHRAIN's fourth Strategic Funding Call**. It identifies UKRI as REPHRAIN's funder. P8 says Amy Orben of Cambridge led the project and this report is work package3. The current DFC project page independently documents the publisher's account of project funding and participating institutions; it shares project ancestry with the report and is not an independent audit of the money.\n\nThe report's back cover separately acknowledges **5Rights Foundation funding of the DFC centre**, describing DFC as a joint LSE/5Rights research centre. Centre support is not evidence of a report-specific earmark. No amount, disbursement, grant conditions, manuscript-approval right or publication veto was acquired.\n\nP5 names **Mariesa Nicholas, Australian e-Safety Commissioner's Office**, among four independent peer reviewers, alongside Hazel Bitaña, Michael Salter and Fabio Senne. This establishes named review participation and contemporaneous institutional affiliation. It does not establish current employment, the substance of her comments, corporate endorsement, or authorship of the toolkit's encryption sentences. The six cover authors remain named authors without allocating particular passages to individuals.\n\n## Released correspondence supplies a specific drafting route\n\nThe official **eSafety FOI25139 / LOG118** document set contains a May2025 industry consultation chain. The consequential readable record is **Document19, PDF29-31**, which preserves the 5May invitation and a 16May response from an @x.com correspondent. The invitation says the toolkit had been developed since the December2024 Safety by Design CSEA workshop, using workshop insights. Its draft core-content list already includes end-to-end encryption and AI. That establishes the subject's presence in a May2025 draft outline, not the four particular recommendations or a December2024 version of those sentences.\n\nThe email identifies **AttachmentA, draft core content**, and **AttachmentB, practical tools**, seeks feedback with particular attention to B, offers marked-up written edits or a 20May online discussion, and announces another opportunity for final-draft redlines before a then-anticipated September launch. These are offered process steps, not proof every step occurred. The sender signs as eSafety's Industry Insights and Enablement Team.\n\nX's 16May reply says it has no additional feedback and looks forward to publication. This establishes draft review access and that particular response. It does not show X supplied wording, approved the final2026 text or had no other communications. The draft attachment bodies and any comment-disposition records were not acquired. Doc13's first page was incompletely exposed by the reader, so this result relies on the repeated invitation in Doc19 rather than pretending the whole original email was read there. Redacted names were not reconstructed.\n\n## The separating observation\n\nThe best next record is now concrete: **May2025 AttachmentA and AttachmentB, the final-draft redlines, comment dispositions, footnote29 source entry and publication clearance**, held by eSafety's toolkit team. These would identify when the encrypted-environment language entered the draft, which participant suggested or amended it, and whether footnote29 was an editing error, indirect principle citation, or intended to point somewhere else. A participant-specific insertion and accepted comment would establish textual influence; a pre-existing paragraph with an editorial citation error would support ordinary drafting/citation failure instead.\n\nFor the money route, the complementary record is the REPHRAIN fourth-call award and work-package budget. That can distinguish ordinary research funding from deliverable-specific approval rights. For the reviewer route, DFC's invitation, comments and author response can distinguish access from substantive changes. Neither inquiry can be replaced by general biographies or shared affiliations.\n\n## Provenance and limits\n\nRead/capture occurred 8September2026 America/Chicago, after midnight9SeptemberUTC. The original researchonline PDF GET returned403; no retry. The public eprints cached reader supplied scoped report text. The original FOI PDF GET timed out after20seconds; no retry. Two publisher pages were retained as original HTTP200 bodies. The three PDF reading extracts have derivative hashes in **encryption-capture-manifest.json** and are not represented as original PDFs.\n\nThe 5Rights launch is dated4December2024 and links a `/126219/1/` file; eSafety links `/126219/3/`. The `/1/` reader failed and was not retried. The numeric path components are recorded as different file locators, not authenticated version numbers; no byte or revision comparison is claimed. Repository metadata records deposit3December2024 and published-version status. Screenshot calls did not yield an image available for inspection here, so footnote placement and the title comparison are grounded in parsed original-page text plus repository metadata, with no visual-verification claim.\n\nThe candidate is structurally separate from case-r8. Context nodes retain existing IDs. New records use `w5-enc`. The toolkit label is retained literally; the exact publication day is not independently established. The fresh toolkit source is another scoped observation of the same official document, not independent corroboration of its technical assertions.\n\nSource URLs: Report (see source references) LSE metadata (see source references) DFC project (see source references) 5Rights launch (see source references) eSafety toolkit (see source references) released FOI correspondence (see source references)\n",
        "file": "research/australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-encryption-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings",
        "title": "Research funding and the monitoring proposal",
        "description": "The new mechanism is resource support plus named advisory access to a published recommendation. Childlight Searchlight2025 Study C (PDF31–32, printed23–24) credits Westpac funding and names a committee including Westpac's Mark Dickson and ICMEC Australia's Danielle Kelly. It recommends broader financial monitoring and cross-sector sharing. This is a publishe",
        "html": "<p>The new mechanism is resource support plus named advisory access to a published recommendation. Childlight Searchlight2025 Study C (PDF31–32, printed23–24) credits Westpac funding and names a committee including Westpac&#x27;s Mark Dickson and ICMEC Australia&#x27;s Danielle Kelly. It recommends broader financial monitoring and cross-sector sharing. This is a published recommendation, not a demonstrated detection system or bank decision. The report acknowledges panel recruitment, self-report and legal-category limitations; no base-rate calibration or operational validation was recovered in the inspected material.</p>\n<p>Westpac&#x27;s 2021 recipients page lists the UNSW Human Rights Institute OCSE survey project in a $150,000-per-award research category, over up to two years. AUD is context-inferred. The 2023 JSS report (p56) thanks Westpac and names the researchers and contributions; the 2025 report links that earlier Australian report as related work. These are distinct outputs. No signed award schedule connects the full 2021 amount to Study C, and none allocates it from the ICMEC $25m award. We therefore keep a separate project node and do not draw an allocated-funding edge between award and later study.</p>\n<p>The study also identifies support for UNSW&#x27;s Childlight hub through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. Global acknowledgements thank JSS for funding two studies. Payment flow, amounts and any double-counting remain unresolved; the case records the disclosed layers separately without summing them. Searchlight&#x27;s programme wording is Safer Families, Safer Communities, whereas Westpac&#x27;s page uses Safer Children, Safer Communities; retain the wording difference rather than silently rewriting the source.</p>\n<p>The most useful next records are the executed award output schedule, committee terms/minutes and author response-to-review table. They would test whether advisers shaped the monitoring recommendation, whether the funder had clearance rights, and what outputs the award actually bought. Sources name ordinary public-health/financial-crime research roles as well as an influence opportunity. Neither funding nor advisory listing settles bad faith, censorship motive or implementation.</p>\n<p>Custody: funding-capture.json lists original URLs, byte sizes and SHA-256 values. Reading scope is recorded in each candidate source. PDF32 funding attribution was visually checked against a rendered original. No holder contact or acquisition payment occurred. Westpac FY22 working-group membership search result was read as discovery context only; no new canonical claim is based on that duplicate/general lane.</p>",
        "path": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08/funding-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-fund-s-childlight",
          "w5-fund-s-jss2023",
          "w5-fund-s-westpac-grants"
        ],
        "markdown": "The new mechanism is resource support plus named advisory access to a published recommendation. Childlight Searchlight2025 Study C (PDF31–32, printed23–24) credits Westpac funding and names a committee including Westpac's Mark Dickson and ICMEC Australia's Danielle Kelly. It recommends broader financial monitoring and cross-sector sharing. This is a published recommendation, not a demonstrated detection system or bank decision. The report acknowledges panel recruitment, self-report and legal-category limitations; no base-rate calibration or operational validation was recovered in the inspected material.\n\nWestpac's 2021 recipients page lists the UNSW Human Rights Institute OCSE survey project in a $150,000-per-award research category, over up to two years. AUD is context-inferred. The 2023 JSS report (p56) thanks Westpac and names the researchers and contributions; the 2025 report links that earlier Australian report as related work. These are distinct outputs. No signed award schedule connects the full 2021 amount to Study C, and none allocates it from the ICMEC $25m award. We therefore keep a separate project node and do not draw an allocated-funding edge between award and later study.\n\nThe study also identifies support for UNSW's Childlight hub through an Edinburgh collaboration agreement under Human Dignity Foundation core grant INT21-01. Global acknowledgements thank JSS for funding two studies. Payment flow, amounts and any double-counting remain unresolved; the case records the disclosed layers separately without summing them. Searchlight's programme wording is Safer Families, Safer Communities, whereas Westpac's page uses Safer Children, Safer Communities; retain the wording difference rather than silently rewriting the source.\n\nThe most useful next records are the executed award output schedule, committee terms/minutes and author response-to-review table. They would test whether advisers shaped the monitoring recommendation, whether the funder had clearance rights, and what outputs the award actually bought. Sources name ordinary public-health/financial-crime research roles as well as an influence opportunity. Neither funding nor advisory listing settles bad faith, censorship motive or implementation.\n\nCustody: funding-capture.json lists original URLs, byte sizes and SHA-256 values. Reading scope is recorded in each candidate source. PDF32 funding attribution was visually checked against a rendered original. No holder contact or acquisition payment occurred. Westpac FY22 working-group membership search result was read as discovery context only; no new canonical claim is based on that duplicate/general lane.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-funding-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings",
        "title": "Australian governance: the board has published decision rights; the July 2023 votes remain unidentified",
        "description": "The new records locate a concrete approval chain inside ICMEC Australia. Its published Board Charter, adopted and effective 6 December 2023, gives its board approval over strategic direction and budgets, major capital expenditure and partnerships, and material funding submissions, new programs and external reporting. Management develops and implements plans ",
        "html": "<p>The new records locate a concrete approval chain inside ICMEC Australia. Its published Board Charter, adopted and effective <strong>6 December 2023</strong>, gives its board approval over strategic direction and budgets, major capital expenditure and partnerships, and material funding submissions, new programs and external reporting. Management develops and implements plans within board-set limits; matters exceeding those limits return for approval. This is a documented governance mechanism in a period before the November 2024 SaferAI paper. It does not prove that any particular paper, grant or product decision reached the board, or how anyone voted. [Board Charter, PDF3–4/printed2–3, clauses2.1–2.3; PDF6/printed5,4.2; PDF7/printed6,5.4](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The new route was the live homepage&#x27;s actual Governance link, <strong>/icmec-australia-governance/</strong>. This is a different URL from the previous failed /governance/ guess. That independently captured page linked the current constitution, charter and policies. Its public WordPress API, discovered from the homepage&#x27;s rel=api.w.org link, disclosed earlier constitution attachments. No ACNC route, proxy or mirror was used.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-former-parent-retains-a-named-constitutional-exception\">The former parent retains a named constitutional exception</h2>\n<p>Both a document headed <strong>ICMEC Australia Constitution – July 2023</strong> and the current <strong>March 2025</strong> text exempt ICMEC US from the usual membership-renewal requirement in clause15.2. Each specifically defines the US corporation by EIN22-3630133. This is affirmative evidence of a continuing named place in the constitutional scheme. It is not the membership register: the exemption alone cannot establish that the US body actually remained a member on any chosen date, that it exercised a vote, or that it retained control. The audit&#x27;s loss-of-sole-membership/control finding on6July2023 remains compatible with a retained, non-controlling membership. [July2023 publication, PDF6 clause15.2 and PDF23 clause73](http[local research file] [March2025 publication, PDF6 clause15.2 and PDF20 clause73](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>In both texts, the board admits applicants, the secretary enters them in the member register, and each member has one vote. Members elect directors and may remove them; the board may fill vacancies under the specified conditions. The board manages the company and records delegations. The register, admission decisions, representative appointments and election resolutions therefore reveal actual governance power; website lists of partner or coalition members do not. Neither inspected appointment scheme gives a named donor a reserved appointment or veto. An undisclosed grant agreement or separate instrument could contain other rights. July2023 locators: PDF5–6 clauses9–15; PDF13 clause33; PDF14–16 clauses39–45; PDF19 clauses58–60. March2025 counterparts: PDF5–6,12–15,17–18.</p>\n<h2 id=\"version-custody-keeps-the-date-question-honest\">Version custody keeps the date question honest</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Original</th>\n<th>Publisher metadata and observed contents</th>\n<th>What it can establish</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf, media602</td>\n<td>Uploaded10September2024; PDF created27July2023; headers July2023;24 pages</td>\n<td>The July-labeled text and its rights, including15.2. Creation/upload timestamps are not an adoption resolution.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FOR-WEBSITE-ICMEC-AU-Proposed-Constitution-27-July-2023.pdf, media603</td>\n<td>Uploaded10September2024; PDF created29September2023; title says Proposed/27July2023; cover says last updated July2022;30 pages</td>\n<td>Same renewal exception at PDF7; unresolved internal version labels. Do not treat it as executed on27July or6July.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ICMEC-AU-Constitution.pdf, media609</td>\n<td>Uploaded11September2024; metadata calls it a reformatted proposed27July2023 copy;29 pages</td>\n<td>Reorganized numbering: same exception3.6.2 at PDF8; no separately established adoption date.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf, media1410</td>\n<td>Uploaded13May2025; PDF created12May2025; title says Jul2023 updated Mar2025;21 pages</td>\n<td>Currently linked publisher constitution, with March2025 headers; not proof of its exact amendment vote or of every earlier clause.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are related publisher versions, not four independent confirmations. The media API also lists a second May2025 file (media1409), which was discovered but not fetched. No earlier-membership names or resolution establishing who replaced or joined the sole member were recovered. The decisive date gap is <strong>the adopted text and resolutions effective6July2023</strong>, not whether a file with 2023 in its name exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-donor-employee-sits-at-the-documented-decision-interface\">A donor employee sits at the documented decision interface</h2>\n<p>The current board page lists <strong>Jodie Arthur</strong>, Westpac General Manager Financial Crime and Group MLRO, as an Australian non-executive director; <strong>Jeremy Moller</strong> is listed as board chair. This refreshes the prior report-period role observation. It supplies a direct institutional entry point to the board approval process, while leaving appointment basis, representational authority and participation in particular decisions unresolved. A director&#x27;s external employer does not inherit the board&#x27;s powers. [Current board page, Jodie Arthur and Jeremy Moller sections](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The published Conflict of Interest Policy places the register of interests with the company secretary. It calls for disclosures, management decisions and their voting results to be recorded. The current constitution separately requires material-conflict disclosure and ordinarily excludes an interested director from discussion/voting, subject to explicit exceptions. These are published rules, not proof of compliance or recusal in a specific Westpac decision. [Policy, PDF4–5,5.2–6.2](http[local research file] current constitution PDF16,50.1–50.4.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-auditor-and-record-holders-are-more-precise\">The auditor and record holders are more precise</h2>\n<p>The already retained US2023 audit, PDF3/printed2, bears <strong>GRF CPAs &amp; Advisors</strong>, grfcpa.com, and says the Australian component auditor&#x27;s statements/reports for the period ended6July2023 were furnished to it. That makes GRF a specifically evidenced recipient of the underlying report. It does not name the Australian auditor. The US audit remains a USD consolidated disclosure; no new cash transfer or Australian expense allocation is inferred.</p>\n<p>The Australian secretary is the constitutionally specified holder of the membership register and minutes, including admission, member and director resolutions (July text PDF19,58–60; March text PDF17–18). The governance page supplies info@icmec.org.au for policy questions. The already captured FY2024–25 Impact Report, PDF18/printed35, names <strong>Griselda Afonso, Senior Manager Accounts and Office Manager</strong>, a report-period finance-route identifier. The PDF author metadata also names her, but metadata does not prove legal authorship, secretary status, audit responsibility or personal custody of a particular record. No named secretary, Australian component auditor or personal email was established.</p>\n<h2 id=\"rival-and-discriminating-record\">Rival and discriminating record</h2>\n<p>The strongest rival to donor-directed policy is an Australian board exercising its own judgment, with a bank executive contributing sector expertise, a legacy non-controlling US relationship, and conflicts handled under its published procedures. A donor-direction explanation predicts specific nomination or reserved rights, funding conditions, instructions, draft clearance, or documented participation in linked approvals. The public rules locate where those mechanisms could operate; they do not show them being exercised.</p>\n<p>The highest-value bundle is the membership-register extract showing names and start/end dates around6July2023, the adopted constitution and amendment/admission/representative/election resolutions, and the Australian component financial statements/report supplied to GRF for that period. For the donor-to-program chain, pair the executed Westpac grant/extension with the relevant board approval papers, delegated-authority schedule, interests declarations and recusal/vote minutes. Inspect institutional roles and dates; unnecessary personal addresses need not be collected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"bounded-access-and-read-scope\">Bounded access and read scope</h2>\n<p>The component report and standalone Australian financials were not obtained. Public exact-entity/identifier/record-family searches and the publisher&#x27;s media search for audit returned no relevant standalone report; financial returned a symposium item. These bounded metadata results do not establish absence from the website or absence of accounts. Broad search incidentally returned ACNC titles; none was opened, fetched or used as financial evidence. The governance page&#x27;s linked June2026 Non-Conduit Policy PDF returned404 once; no retry or inferred contents. The web reader&#x27;s cache miss for the new governance URL was followed by a successful direct publisher GET, whose original is retained; no restricted surface was involved.</p>\n<p>Read: July2023 publication&#x27;s clauses9–15,33,39–45,58–60,73, with related context on the cited pages; March2025 corresponding provisions plus39.1,47,49–50; the complete seven-page charter; conflict policy5.2–6.2 and surrounding policy; current board role panels; API metadata and version-label passages of the two proposed/reformatted copies. The renewal clauses in July2023/March2025, the charter&#x27;s program/management approvals, and the GRF header/component paragraph were visually checked. Other extracted text is retained but is not declared wholly reviewed. Originals, derived text and hashes are in governance-capture-manifest.json. No outreach, payment, publication or canonical-case mutation occurred.</p>",
        "path": "australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08/governance-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-gov-s-page",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025",
          "w5-gov-s-charter",
          "w5-gov-s-conflicts",
          "w5-gov-s-board",
          "w5-gov-s-media-constitution",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2023",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution-reformatted",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution-proposed",
          "w5-gov-s-media-audit",
          "w5-gov-s-media-financial",
          "w5-gov-s-nonconduit",
          "w5-gov-s-constitution2025-alt"
        ],
        "markdown": "The new records locate a concrete approval chain inside ICMEC Australia. Its published Board Charter, adopted and effective **6 December 2023**, gives its board approval over strategic direction and budgets, major capital expenditure and partnerships, and material funding submissions, new programs and external reporting. Management develops and implements plans within board-set limits; matters exceeding those limits return for approval. This is a documented governance mechanism in a period before the November 2024 SaferAI paper. It does not prove that any particular paper, grant or product decision reached the board, or how anyone voted. Board Charter, PDF3–4/printed2–3, clauses2.1–2.3; PDF6/printed5,4.2; PDF7/printed6,5.4 (see source references)\n\nThe new route was the live homepage's actual Governance link, **/icmec-australia-governance/**. This is a different URL from the previous failed /governance/ guess. That independently captured page linked the current constitution, charter and policies. Its public WordPress API, discovered from the homepage's rel=api.w.org link, disclosed earlier constitution attachments. No ACNC route, proxy or mirror was used.\n\n## The former parent retains a named constitutional exception\n\nBoth a document headed **ICMEC Australia Constitution – July 2023** and the current **March 2025** text exempt ICMEC US from the usual membership-renewal requirement in clause15.2. Each specifically defines the US corporation by EIN22-3630133. This is affirmative evidence of a continuing named place in the constitutional scheme. It is not the membership register: the exemption alone cannot establish that the US body actually remained a member on any chosen date, that it exercised a vote, or that it retained control. The audit's loss-of-sole-membership/control finding on6July2023 remains compatible with a retained, non-controlling membership. July2023 publication, PDF6 clause15.2 and PDF23 clause73 (see source references) March2025 publication, PDF6 clause15.2 and PDF20 clause73 (see source references)\n\nIn both texts, the board admits applicants, the secretary enters them in the member register, and each member has one vote. Members elect directors and may remove them; the board may fill vacancies under the specified conditions. The board manages the company and records delegations. The register, admission decisions, representative appointments and election resolutions therefore reveal actual governance power; website lists of partner or coalition members do not. Neither inspected appointment scheme gives a named donor a reserved appointment or veto. An undisclosed grant agreement or separate instrument could contain other rights. July2023 locators: PDF5–6 clauses9–15; PDF13 clause33; PDF14–16 clauses39–45; PDF19 clauses58–60. March2025 counterparts: PDF5–6,12–15,17–18.\n\n## Version custody keeps the date question honest\n\n| Original | Publisher metadata and observed contents | What it can establish |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf, media602 | Uploaded10September2024; PDF created27July2023; headers July2023;24 pages | The July-labeled text and its rights, including15.2. Creation/upload timestamps are not an adoption resolution. |\n| FOR-WEBSITE-ICMEC-AU-Proposed-Constitution-27-July-2023.pdf, media603 | Uploaded10September2024; PDF created29September2023; title says Proposed/27July2023; cover says last updated July2022;30 pages | Same renewal exception at PDF7; unresolved internal version labels. Do not treat it as executed on27July or6July. |\n| ICMEC-AU-Constitution.pdf, media609 | Uploaded11September2024; metadata calls it a reformatted proposed27July2023 copy;29 pages | Reorganized numbering: same exception3.6.2 at PDF8; no separately established adoption date. |\n| ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf, media1410 | Uploaded13May2025; PDF created12May2025; title says Jul2023 updated Mar2025;21 pages | Currently linked publisher constitution, with March2025 headers; not proof of its exact amendment vote or of every earlier clause. |\n\nThese are related publisher versions, not four independent confirmations. The media API also lists a second May2025 file (media1409), which was discovered but not fetched. No earlier-membership names or resolution establishing who replaced or joined the sole member were recovered. The decisive date gap is **the adopted text and resolutions effective6July2023**, not whether a file with 2023 in its name exists.\n\n## A donor employee sits at the documented decision interface\n\nThe current board page lists **Jodie Arthur**, Westpac General Manager Financial Crime and Group MLRO, as an Australian non-executive director; **Jeremy Moller** is listed as board chair. This refreshes the prior report-period role observation. It supplies a direct institutional entry point to the board approval process, while leaving appointment basis, representational authority and participation in particular decisions unresolved. A director's external employer does not inherit the board's powers. Current board page, Jodie Arthur and Jeremy Moller sections (see source references)\n\nThe published Conflict of Interest Policy places the register of interests with the company secretary. It calls for disclosures, management decisions and their voting results to be recorded. The current constitution separately requires material-conflict disclosure and ordinarily excludes an interested director from discussion/voting, subject to explicit exceptions. These are published rules, not proof of compliance or recusal in a specific Westpac decision. Policy, PDF4–5,5.2–6.2 (see source references) current constitution PDF16,50.1–50.4.\n\n## The auditor and record holders are more precise\n\nThe already retained US2023 audit, PDF3/printed2, bears **GRF CPAs & Advisors**, grfcpa.com, and says the Australian component auditor's statements/reports for the period ended6July2023 were furnished to it. That makes GRF a specifically evidenced recipient of the underlying report. It does not name the Australian auditor. The US audit remains a USD consolidated disclosure; no new cash transfer or Australian expense allocation is inferred.\n\nThe Australian secretary is the constitutionally specified holder of the membership register and minutes, including admission, member and director resolutions (July text PDF19,58–60; March text PDF17–18). The governance page supplies info@icmec.org.au for policy questions. The already captured FY2024–25 Impact Report, PDF18/printed35, names **Griselda Afonso, Senior Manager Accounts and Office Manager**, a report-period finance-route identifier. The PDF author metadata also names her, but metadata does not prove legal authorship, secretary status, audit responsibility or personal custody of a particular record. No named secretary, Australian component auditor or personal email was established.\n\n## Rival and discriminating record\n\nThe strongest rival to donor-directed policy is an Australian board exercising its own judgment, with a bank executive contributing sector expertise, a legacy non-controlling US relationship, and conflicts handled under its published procedures. A donor-direction explanation predicts specific nomination or reserved rights, funding conditions, instructions, draft clearance, or documented participation in linked approvals. The public rules locate where those mechanisms could operate; they do not show them being exercised.\n\nThe highest-value bundle is the membership-register extract showing names and start/end dates around6July2023, the adopted constitution and amendment/admission/representative/election resolutions, and the Australian component financial statements/report supplied to GRF for that period. For the donor-to-program chain, pair the executed Westpac grant/extension with the relevant board approval papers, delegated-authority schedule, interests declarations and recusal/vote minutes. Inspect institutional roles and dates; unnecessary personal addresses need not be collected.\n\n## Bounded access and read scope\n\nThe component report and standalone Australian financials were not obtained. Public exact-entity/identifier/record-family searches and the publisher's media search for audit returned no relevant standalone report; financial returned a symposium item. These bounded metadata results do not establish absence from the website or absence of accounts. Broad search incidentally returned ACNC titles; none was opened, fetched or used as financial evidence. The governance page's linked June2026 Non-Conduit Policy PDF returned404 once; no retry or inferred contents. The web reader's cache miss for the new governance URL was followed by a successful direct publisher GET, whose original is retained; no restricted surface was involved.\n\nRead: July2023 publication's clauses9–15,33,39–45,58–60,73, with related context on the cited pages; March2025 corresponding provisions plus39.1,47,49–50; the complete seven-page charter; conflict policy5.2–6.2 and surrounding policy; current board role panels; API metadata and version-label passages of the two proposed/reformatted copies. The renewal clauses in July2023/March2025, the charter's program/management approvals, and the GRF header/component paragraph were visually checked. Other extracted text is retained but is not declared wholly reviewed. Originals, derived text and hashes are in governance-capture-manifest.json. No outreach, payment, publication or canonical-case mutation occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-decision-wave-2026-09-08-governance-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings",
        "title": "Award instruments: bounded public-source return",
        "description": "Prepared 8 September 2026 (America/Chicago); retrieval timestamps fall on 9 September UTC. Candidate-only additions against case-r9. Acquisition frozen. No canonical edits, outreach or private access.",
        "html": "<p>Prepared 8 September 2026 (America/Chicago); retrieval timestamps fall on 9 September UTC. Candidate-only additions against case-r9. Acquisition frozen. No canonical edits, outreach or private access.</p>\n<h2 id=\"result\">Result</h2>\n<p>The public record now connects the fourth REPHRAIN call to the Cambridge-led Toolbox award and exposes an actual, separately credited Work Package 2 output. It does <strong>not</strong> expose the Toolbox&#x27;s award value, payment schedule, final acceptance, publication-rights clause or split between work packages.</p>\n<p>For the Westpac-supported survey, the referenced OSF registration is now readable in both original and revised form. It expressly records registration <strong>after analysis</strong>, and therefore cannot establish an analysis plan fixed before data collection. The authors&#x27; methods account explains a scope expansion and recruitment arrangement, but supplies neither the grant agreement nor a per-output budget. This improves the money map by narrowing the unresolved instrument, rather than assigning existing large amounts to later publications.</p>\n<h2 id=\"1-rephrain-award-confirmation-output-identity-missing-instrument\">1. REPHRAIN: award confirmation, output identity, missing instrument</h2>\n<p>The centre announced on <strong>18 January 2024</strong> that four projects had received grants following competition; the Toolbox is one of them. UKRI&#x27;s EP/V011189/1 record identifies a Cambridge collaboration under call four with a <strong>2023 start year</strong>, and says its outputs feed the centre&#x27;s research resources. The March2025 date on the current project page is a page date; it must not be substituted for an award start.</p>\n<p>The same UKRI record links the WP2 reliability-analysis page. That artifact is dated <strong>1 October2024</strong> and credits <strong>Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben</strong>. Its rationale names an evaluation report and shareable analytical code, alongside intended updating with Cambridge/LSE/UNICEF teams through2025. This is a real published work product; it is separate from the retained December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. I read its identity and rationale, not its scientific validity or executable code.</p>\n<p>UKRI&#x27;s <strong>GBP6,972,599</strong>, funded September2020-August2024, belongs to the parent centre award. It supplies no basis for a Toolbox or DFC allocation. Two similarly titled UKRI outcome rows also differ on whether material was supplied to others; the public linked artifact prevents treating that metadata difference as evidence of concealed research. The rows are not two awards.</p>\n<p>What would change interpretation: the Cambridge/Bristol award letter and cost schedule, the collaboration or subaward agreement, work-package budget, and actual output-acceptance/publication clauses. REPHRAIN/Bristol and Cambridge are the identifiable institutional holders. Announced funding and integration of outputs are established; donor editing, approval or veto is not.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2-osf-exact-registration-chronology-not-prospective-planning\">2. OSF: exact registration chronology, not prospective planning</h2>\n<p>Childlight2025 StudyC, PDF32/printed24, links <strong>http[local research file] and identifies </strong>HC220317**. An ordinary public API request recovered the registration and its linked response history.</p>\n<p>The registration timestamp is <strong>10 November2023,16:41:26 UTC</strong>. Both original and revised answers to <strong>q8 / Existing Data</strong> say <strong>“Registration following analysis of the data”</strong>. The generic template name is OSF Preregistration; the actual selected answer governs this classification.</p>\n<p>The original response record <strong>654e5d376caf8e05d96f32fe</strong> leaves measured variables and statistical models as TBC. Revision <strong>65703b40788e5c03f74629f4</strong>, submitted <strong>6 December2023</strong>, fills those sections, including internet banking, cryptocurrency and privacy-software measures. The current registration endpoint contains these revised responses; they must not be backdated to10 November. The revised model description cautions against causal inference from cross-sectional data.</p>\n<p>Neither response version supplies grant amount, payment schedule, a funding-role statement or publication rights. Post-analysis registration is a declared evidentiary limitation, not proof of misconduct. It also cannot show that a bank selected the later financial-monitoring recommendations.</p>\n<h2 id=\"3-survey-implementation-and-later-output-budgets\">3. Survey implementation and later output budgets</h2>\n<p>Whitten, Salter and Woodlock&#x27;s <strong>29 July2025 CrimRxiv methodology preprint</strong>, release1, reports an original design for3,000Australian men, Westpac funding, and advisory review. It says CloudResearch subsequently recruited/administered through PrimePanels after an earlier contractor declined the subject matter. This is the authors&#x27; account, not vendor correspondence or an executed service contract.</p>\n<p>The authors report expansion to UK/US samples after ethical and stakeholder approval <strong>at no extra cost</strong>, with fieldwork in November-December2022. Neither approving individuals nor the cost baseline is specified. The statement does not establish that later analyses, publication or institutional support cost nothing.</p>\n<p>StudyC&#x27;s4,918-person survey and protocol/ethics identifiers match this lineage. Another2025 chapter, Swipe wrong, links the same registration and funding acknowledgment (PDF43/printed35). Shared data and acknowledgments are not separate awards. No2021$150,000-to-2025StudyC budget identity, ICMEC$25m earmark, or HDF allocation is established. Survey-team/UNSW/Westpac grant and amendment records are the next useful records.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquired-evidence-and-exact-read-scope\">Acquired evidence and exact read scope</h2>\n<p>All original successful responses and failed-route receipts are recorded in <strong>award-captures.jsonl</strong>. <strong>award-scoped-extracts.json</strong> contains derivative text locators and selected JSON records; derivative extracts are not mislabeled as originals. Existing Childlight and Westpac originals remain in the prior wave and were not redownloaded. The candidate references their stable source IDs.</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-launch\">w6-award-s-launch</h3>\n<p>REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: Main announcement dated 18 January 2024; project list</p>\n<p>Read scope: Read entire main announcement; navigation and unrelated related posts excluded.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-rephrain-launch.html</p>\n<p>SHA-256: c48a9ffbfde54c48bf9e454a627bc6e9d6f748e02078ce4b51c19a153f3ca037</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-gtr\">w6-award-s-gtr</h3>\n<p>UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: Funding fields; collaboration row REPHRAIN Strategic Funding call 4 - University of Cambridge; two Toolbox research database/model rows. Derived text lines 33-48,1042-1070,1770-1784.</p>\n<p>Read scope: Scoped read of funding header, Cambridge call-4 row and two Toolbox outcome rows. Did not review the centre-wide publication/partner roster or all claimed impacts.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-gtr-rephrain.html</p>\n<p>SHA-256: 7bb844ac1adcb644ed797373823ce94d58aeb225d2a188eb1ea077fa4cfd1188</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-wp2\">w6-award-s-wp2</h3>\n<p>REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: Title/byline/date; section 0.1 Rationale, Objective, Method, Output. Derived text lines1-66.</p>\n<p>Read scope: Read title/byline/date and section0.1; code/result body captured but not scientifically audited or executed.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-toolbox-wp2.html</p>\n<p>SHA-256: 4566e1e82db81cd551981cd149953ba7a8f8233ed31b6682682f7720ecefc5a8</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-registration\">w6-award-s-registration</h3>\n<p>OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: Public API http[local research file] ; data.attributes.date_registered, registered_meta, registration_responses (especially q8, q15.question, q17.question), relationships.schema_responses.</p>\n<p>Read scope: Read all registration attributes and responses; relationship metadata used only to locate response history and schema.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-osf-registration.json</p>\n<p>SHA-256: 5a506a840c1c8a44184e88b58f96bcfce2fbb56f9dfcacf90f4926b9a4bdbe75</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-revisions\">w6-award-s-revisions</h3>\n<p>OSF j7xh2 response revision history</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: data ids654e5d376caf8e05d96f32fe (original) and65703b40788e5c03f74629f4 (revision); attributes.date_created/date_submitted/revision_responses/is_original_response.</p>\n<p>Read scope: Read both response records, metadata and complete original/revised answers.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-osf-responses.json</p>\n<p>SHA-256: 1111174d503cf066b771d173a070d0e46dac2609ffc16fd0d438d12f1d81d8c1</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-schema\">w6-award-s-schema</h3>\n<p>OSF Preregistration schema version3</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: data.attributes.schema.pages: Sampling Plan / q8 Existing Data; q15 Measures; q17 Statistical models.</p>\n<p>Read scope: Scoped read of the named schema questions and q8 option definitions; remaining template retained, not applied as instructions.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-osf-schema.json</p>\n<p>SHA-256: e5549f4d090ca36f2c9265e2893623bd016e9d90f56b7e0b453a8bc7c9363c07</p>\n<h3 id=\"w6-award-s-methods\">w6-award-s-methods</h3>\n<p>Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1</p>\n<p>http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Locator: Published29 July2025; DOI10.21428/cb6ab371.d5f32f4f; Methodology/participant recruitment paragraphs; publisher text lines57-100. Download http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Read scope: Read web introduction/methodology/measures and limitations; funding/role/disclosure searches; retained publisher-linked plain-text export. Entire 60KB export retained but full results/reference list not audited.</p>\n<p>Original: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-methodology-publisher.txt</p>\n<p>SHA-256: 5dfc4d6aa9becdc8ef7d1f4e070f06f07826978dfd2f56517b4b8b86c3585b23</p>\n<h2 id=\"closed-routes-and-negative-frontier\">Closed routes and negative frontier</h2>\n<p>The direct OSF web-reader route failed and its normal HTML route yielded a JavaScript shell; the public, unauthenticated registration API and linked response history succeeded. This is a completed substitute, not a protocol access gap.</p>\n<p>The CrimRxiv article&#x27;s ordinary GET returned403; the web reader exposed its text and publisher download links. The linked publisher plain-text export returned200 and is retained with its own hash. Failed PDF/plain-text web-parser requests were not treated as missing originals after that download succeeded.</p>\n<p>The original long UKRI search URL failed in the web parser; an ordinary public search and the parent-grant page succeeded. No further search retry is needed.</p>\n<p>The current REPHRAIN funding page concerns a different2025call. A targeted search found the old fourth-call announcement and a secondary ResearchConnect summary, but no executed project terms. An institutional RISCS archive substitute failed; REPHRAIN&#x27;s public search endpoint returned401. Those routes were closed without attempting authentication or transplanting another call&#x27;s terms. Secondary call ceilings were not promoted into project amounts.</p>\n<p>A PMC article route presented a browser challenge; it was not bypassed. The already readable methodology paper was sufficient for the bounded implementation point. No no-role-by-funder declaration was acquired. Absence of one in the read protocol/methods passages does not prove none exists elsewhere.</p>\n<p>The handoff contains4newnodes,5newedges and2updates to existing edges. It creates <strong>no new money-flow edge</strong> and changes no existing amount. The source families remain separate from independent corroboration: OSF template/current/history are one platform record; the author methods text and Childlight report share research ancestry; UKRI outcomes contain researcher reports rather than an independent acceptance audit.</p>",
        "path": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-award-s-launch",
          "w6-award-s-gtr",
          "w6-award-s-wp2",
          "w6-award-s-registration",
          "w6-award-s-revisions",
          "w6-award-s-schema",
          "w6-award-s-methods"
        ],
        "markdown": "Prepared 8 September 2026 (America/Chicago); retrieval timestamps fall on 9 September UTC. Candidate-only additions against case-r9. Acquisition frozen. No canonical edits, outreach or private access.\n\n## Result\n\nThe public record now connects the fourth REPHRAIN call to the Cambridge-led Toolbox award and exposes an actual, separately credited Work Package 2 output. It does **not** expose the Toolbox's award value, payment schedule, final acceptance, publication-rights clause or split between work packages.\n\nFor the Westpac-supported survey, the referenced OSF registration is now readable in both original and revised form. It expressly records registration **after analysis**, and therefore cannot establish an analysis plan fixed before data collection. The authors' methods account explains a scope expansion and recruitment arrangement, but supplies neither the grant agreement nor a per-output budget. This improves the money map by narrowing the unresolved instrument, rather than assigning existing large amounts to later publications.\n\n## 1. REPHRAIN: award confirmation, output identity, missing instrument\n\nThe centre announced on **18 January 2024** that four projects had received grants following competition; the Toolbox is one of them. UKRI's EP/V011189/1 record identifies a Cambridge collaboration under call four with a **2023 start year**, and says its outputs feed the centre's research resources. The March2025 date on the current project page is a page date; it must not be substituted for an award start.\n\nThe same UKRI record links the WP2 reliability-analysis page. That artifact is dated **1 October2024** and credits **Matthew Richards, Sakshi Ghai and Amy Orben**. Its rationale names an evaluation report and shareable analytical code, alongside intended updating with Cambridge/LSE/UNICEF teams through2025. This is a real published work product; it is separate from the retained December2024 DFC WorkPackage3 report. I read its identity and rationale, not its scientific validity or executable code.\n\nUKRI's **GBP6,972,599**, funded September2020-August2024, belongs to the parent centre award. It supplies no basis for a Toolbox or DFC allocation. Two similarly titled UKRI outcome rows also differ on whether material was supplied to others; the public linked artifact prevents treating that metadata difference as evidence of concealed research. The rows are not two awards.\n\nWhat would change interpretation: the Cambridge/Bristol award letter and cost schedule, the collaboration or subaward agreement, work-package budget, and actual output-acceptance/publication clauses. REPHRAIN/Bristol and Cambridge are the identifiable institutional holders. Announced funding and integration of outputs are established; donor editing, approval or veto is not.\n\n## 2. OSF: exact registration chronology, not prospective planning\n\nChildlight2025 StudyC, PDF32/printed24, links **http[local research file] and identifies **HC220317**. An ordinary public API request recovered the registration and its linked response history.\n\nThe registration timestamp is **10 November2023,16:41:26 UTC**. Both original and revised answers to **q8 / Existing Data** say **“Registration following analysis of the data”**. The generic template name is OSF Preregistration; the actual selected answer governs this classification.\n\nThe original response record **654e5d376caf8e05d96f32fe** leaves measured variables and statistical models as TBC. Revision **65703b40788e5c03f74629f4**, submitted **6 December2023**, fills those sections, including internet banking, cryptocurrency and privacy-software measures. The current registration endpoint contains these revised responses; they must not be backdated to10 November. The revised model description cautions against causal inference from cross-sectional data.\n\nNeither response version supplies grant amount, payment schedule, a funding-role statement or publication rights. Post-analysis registration is a declared evidentiary limitation, not proof of misconduct. It also cannot show that a bank selected the later financial-monitoring recommendations.\n\n## 3. Survey implementation and later output budgets\n\nWhitten, Salter and Woodlock's **29 July2025 CrimRxiv methodology preprint**, release1, reports an original design for3,000Australian men, Westpac funding, and advisory review. It says CloudResearch subsequently recruited/administered through PrimePanels after an earlier contractor declined the subject matter. This is the authors' account, not vendor correspondence or an executed service contract.\n\nThe authors report expansion to UK/US samples after ethical and stakeholder approval **at no extra cost**, with fieldwork in November-December2022. Neither approving individuals nor the cost baseline is specified. The statement does not establish that later analyses, publication or institutional support cost nothing.\n\nStudyC's4,918-person survey and protocol/ethics identifiers match this lineage. Another2025 chapter, Swipe wrong, links the same registration and funding acknowledgment (PDF43/printed35). Shared data and acknowledgments are not separate awards. No2021$150,000-to-2025StudyC budget identity, ICMEC$25m earmark, or HDF allocation is established. Survey-team/UNSW/Westpac grant and amendment records are the next useful records.\n\n## Acquired evidence and exact read scope\n\nAll original successful responses and failed-route receipts are recorded in **award-captures.jsonl**. **award-scoped-extracts.json** contains derivative text locators and selected JSON records; derivative extracts are not mislabeled as originals. Existing Childlight and Westpac originals remain in the prior wave and were not redownloaded. The candidate references their stable source IDs.\n\n### w6-award-s-launch\n\nREPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: Main announcement dated 18 January 2024; project list\n\nRead scope: Read entire main announcement; navigation and unrelated related posts excluded.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-rephrain-launch.html\n\nSHA-256: c48a9ffbfde54c48bf9e454a627bc6e9d6f748e02078ce4b51c19a153f3ca037\n\n### w6-award-s-gtr\n\nUKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: Funding fields; collaboration row REPHRAIN Strategic Funding call 4 - University of Cambridge; two Toolbox research database/model rows. Derived text lines 33-48,1042-1070,1770-1784.\n\nRead scope: Scoped read of funding header, Cambridge call-4 row and two Toolbox outcome rows. Did not review the centre-wide publication/partner roster or all claimed impacts.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-gtr-rephrain.html\n\nSHA-256: 7bb844ac1adcb644ed797373823ce94d58aeb225d2a188eb1ea077fa4cfd1188\n\n### w6-award-s-wp2\n\nREPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: Title/byline/date; section 0.1 Rationale, Objective, Method, Output. Derived text lines1-66.\n\nRead scope: Read title/byline/date and section0.1; code/result body captured but not scientifically audited or executed.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-toolbox-wp2.html\n\nSHA-256: 4566e1e82db81cd551981cd149953ba7a8f8233ed31b6682682f7720ecefc5a8\n\n### w6-award-s-registration\n\nOSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: Public API http[local research file] ; data.attributes.date_registered, registered_meta, registration_responses (especially q8, q15.question, q17.question), relationships.schema_responses.\n\nRead scope: Read all registration attributes and responses; relationship metadata used only to locate response history and schema.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-osf-registration.json\n\nSHA-256: 5a506a840c1c8a44184e88b58f96bcfce2fbb56f9dfcacf90f4926b9a4bdbe75\n\n### w6-award-s-revisions\n\nOSF j7xh2 response revision history\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: data ids654e5d376caf8e05d96f32fe (original) and65703b40788e5c03f74629f4 (revision); attributes.date_created/date_submitted/revision_responses/is_original_response.\n\nRead scope: Read both response records, metadata and complete original/revised answers.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-osf-responses.json\n\nSHA-256: 1111174d503cf066b771d173a070d0e46dac2609ffc16fd0d438d12f1d81d8c1\n\n### w6-award-s-schema\n\nOSF Preregistration schema version3\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: data.attributes.schema.pages: Sampling Plan / q8 Existing Data; q15 Measures; q17 Statistical models.\n\nRead scope: Scoped read of the named schema questions and q8 option definitions; remaining template retained, not applied as instructions.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-osf-schema.json\n\nSHA-256: e5549f4d090ca36f2c9265e2893623bd016e9d90f56b7e0b453a8bc7c9363c07\n\n### w6-award-s-methods\n\nWhitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1\n\nhttp[local research file]\n\nLocator: Published29 July2025; DOI10.21428/cb6ab371.d5f32f4f; Methodology/participant recruitment paragraphs; publisher text lines57-100. Download http[local research file]\n\nRead scope: Read web introduction/methodology/measures and limitations; funding/role/disclosure searches; retained publisher-linked plain-text export. Entire 60KB export retained but full results/reference list not audited.\n\nOriginal: australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/award-methodology-publisher.txt\n\nSHA-256: 5dfc4d6aa9becdc8ef7d1f4e070f06f07826978dfd2f56517b4b8b86c3585b23\n\n## Closed routes and negative frontier\n\nThe direct OSF web-reader route failed and its normal HTML route yielded a JavaScript shell; the public, unauthenticated registration API and linked response history succeeded. This is a completed substitute, not a protocol access gap.\n\nThe CrimRxiv article's ordinary GET returned403; the web reader exposed its text and publisher download links. The linked publisher plain-text export returned200 and is retained with its own hash. Failed PDF/plain-text web-parser requests were not treated as missing originals after that download succeeded.\n\nThe original long UKRI search URL failed in the web parser; an ordinary public search and the parent-grant page succeeded. No further search retry is needed.\n\nThe current REPHRAIN funding page concerns a different2025call. A targeted search found the old fourth-call announcement and a secondary ResearchConnect summary, but no executed project terms. An institutional RISCS archive substitute failed; REPHRAIN's public search endpoint returned401. Those routes were closed without attempting authentication or transplanting another call's terms. Secondary call ceilings were not promoted into project amounts.\n\nA PMC article route presented a browser challenge; it was not bypassed. The already readable methodology paper was sufficient for the bounded implementation point. No no-role-by-funder declaration was acquired. Absence of one in the read protocol/methods passages does not prove none exists elsewhere.\n\nThe handoff contains4newnodes,5newedges and2updates to existing edges. It creates **no new money-flow edge** and changes no existing amount. The source families remain separate from independent corroboration: OSF template/current/history are one platform record; the author methods text and Childlight report share research ancestry; UKRI outcomes contain researcher reports rather than an independent acceptance audit.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-award-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings",
        "title": "draft findings",
        "description": "The new public seam is Common Sense Media's dated review of a later eSafety draft. Its three-page comments, dated 31 October 2025, say the organisation participated in the December 2024 workshop and was answering a request to review Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Page 2 requests clearer age-assurance error rates, fallback p",
        "html": "<p>The new public seam is Common Sense Media&#x27;s dated review of a later eSafety draft. Its three-page comments, dated 31 October 2025, say the organisation participated in the December 2024 workshop and was answering a request to review Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Page 2 requests clearer age-assurance error rates, fallback procedures and data-minimisation practices, citing a New York proposed-rulemaking model. Page 3 supports safety education in engineering/company leadership and proactive detection. This is a specific contribution to trace; no recipient acknowledgment, accepted edit, payment or encryption-list authorship is established. All three pages were read, and the PDF&#x27;s outgoing links were inspected for a draft link; none was identified. “End-to-end reporting flows” on page 2 is not E2EE guidance. [Original comments](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The [publisher&#x27;s Public Filings and Letters page](http[local research file] links the exact comments under both 2025 and International. Both the PDF and the listing HTML were captured by ordinary public GET with HTTP200. The PDF is 134,371 bytes, SHA-256 <code>41c0f4bd80c977d2b8647edee6efd14ba2c5cd7ec9c216fd7b154ed7b5fbede2</code>. The listing is 103,581 bytes, SHA-256 <code>2319a52809690ceb8f8da2e3a667a4249c238846f621dfcb70a1d84e0b5fe46c</code>. They are the same publisher family, not independent confirmation of receipt. The date printed on the letter is not proof of its public-upload date. The listing reading scope was the two relevant links only.</p>\n<p>The [eSafety disclosure log](http[local research file] as retrieved through the search index, identifies Log118 as FOI25139, listed 5 September 2025: non-legal eSafety/X correspondence from 1 January to 23 June 2025; eighteen documents partly released and four wholly exempt. It lists redactions under sections22,37(2)(b),47E(d),47F, but provides no allocation to particular records in the inspected entry. The listing date is not treated as the decision date. Its general statement says documents are published for twelve months and older records remain available on request. Direct page-open returned InternalError; one ordinary GET timed out after twenty seconds. Only the indexed entry/retention statement was preserved, not original HTML. Those four unidentified exempt records must not be described as draft attachments. No full decision notice or document schedule was obtained. This is a release-summary observation, not legal advice on the validity of exemptions.</p>\n<p>Exact May draft filenames were recovered from search-indexed Document13, the 5 May 2025,8:08PM email header in the [existing LOG118 PDF](http[local research file] They are:</p>\n<p><code>Attachment A - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx</code></p>\n<p><code>Attachment B - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Tools only - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx</code></p>\n<p>The main web-reader still omitted Document13&#x27;s first page, PDF20; the exact filenames are therefore specifically an indexed-primary-document observation. Existing Document19, PDF30–31, remains the read evidence for the content outline and markup invitation. Neither attached DOCX was acquired, and the outline does not establish any recommendation&#x27;s wording. The changed URL query parameter is not evidence of a changed PDF version. Preserve source ID <code>w5-enc-s-foi</code> and append this narrower observation; do not duplicate the source or invent an original PDF hash.</p>\n<p>Bounded searches covered the exact AttachmentA/B filenames, the distinctive draft title, FOI25139/LOG118 plus decision terms, and a Right to Know domain query. Exact filename results returned the official email record, not a downloadable draft. The genuinely new public path was the Common Sense Media comments and their publisher listing. No later redline, disposition table, decision schedule or underlying October draft emerged within that search boundary. This is not an exhaustive absence finding.</p>\n<p>The timing matters: October2025 lies outside FOI25139&#x27;s January–June2025 window. The new comments demonstrate a later review opportunity but cannot establish when particular final text appeared. Three obtainable record families are now precisely identified: the two named May DOCX files with returned edits; FOI25139&#x27;s decision and schedule explaining attachment treatment; and the October review invitation, circulated draft, receipt and comment-disposition records. The separating observation is a dated version/redline with an attributed change and editorial disposition. A refusal, an already-existing passage or a rejected suggestion would narrow the influence claim.</p>\n<p>Stopping condition met: named records sharpened, release scope and unresolved exemptions recorded, and one new contributor-owned public path acquired and read. No unchanged GET retry of the toolkit or original FOI PDF, no outreach, submissions, payment or canonical edits. Toolkit technical-reference tracing belongs to the root lane.</p>\n<p>Local custody: <code>draft-csm-comments.pdf</code>, <code>draft-csm-filings.html</code> and <code>draft-capture-manifest.json</code> retain originals and hashes. <code>draft-foi-filenames-index-extract.json</code> and <code>draft-disclosure-index-extract.json</code> are expressly derivative captures. <code>draft-candidate.json</code> proposes four new nodes, seven edges, three new sources, one stable-source observation update and three leads. Context nodes are carried only for validation and must not replace canonical context. No hypothesis of funding or donor control is added.</p>",
        "path": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/draft-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w5-enc-s-foi",
          "w6-draft-s-disclosure-log",
          "w6-draft-s-csm-comments",
          "w6-draft-s-csm-filings"
        ],
        "markdown": "The new public seam is Common Sense Media's dated review of a later eSafety draft. Its three-page comments, dated 31 October 2025, say the organisation participated in the December 2024 workshop and was answering a request to review Designing for Safety: Preventing Grievous Harm Before It Happens. Page 2 requests clearer age-assurance error rates, fallback procedures and data-minimisation practices, citing a New York proposed-rulemaking model. Page 3 supports safety education in engineering/company leadership and proactive detection. This is a specific contribution to trace; no recipient acknowledgment, accepted edit, payment or encryption-list authorship is established. All three pages were read, and the PDF's outgoing links were inspected for a draft link; none was identified. “End-to-end reporting flows” on page 2 is not E2EE guidance. Original comments (see source references)\n\nThe publisher's Public Filings and Letters page (see source references) links the exact comments under both 2025 and International. Both the PDF and the listing HTML were captured by ordinary public GET with HTTP200. The PDF is 134,371 bytes, SHA-256 `41c0f4bd80c977d2b8647edee6efd14ba2c5cd7ec9c216fd7b154ed7b5fbede2`. The listing is 103,581 bytes, SHA-256 `2319a52809690ceb8f8da2e3a667a4249c238846f621dfcb70a1d84e0b5fe46c`. They are the same publisher family, not independent confirmation of receipt. The date printed on the letter is not proof of its public-upload date. The listing reading scope was the two relevant links only.\n\nThe eSafety disclosure log (see source references) as retrieved through the search index, identifies Log118 as FOI25139, listed 5 September 2025: non-legal eSafety/X correspondence from 1 January to 23 June 2025; eighteen documents partly released and four wholly exempt. It lists redactions under sections22,37(2)(b),47E(d),47F, but provides no allocation to particular records in the inspected entry. The listing date is not treated as the decision date. Its general statement says documents are published for twelve months and older records remain available on request. Direct page-open returned InternalError; one ordinary GET timed out after twenty seconds. Only the indexed entry/retention statement was preserved, not original HTML. Those four unidentified exempt records must not be described as draft attachments. No full decision notice or document schedule was obtained. This is a release-summary observation, not legal advice on the validity of exemptions.\n\nExact May draft filenames were recovered from search-indexed Document13, the 5 May 2025,8:08PM email header in the existing LOG118 PDF (see source references) They are:\n\n`Attachment A - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx`\n\n`Attachment B - DRAFT CSEA SbD Toolkit - Tools only - Industry feedback - May 2025.docx`\n\nThe main web-reader still omitted Document13's first page, PDF20; the exact filenames are therefore specifically an indexed-primary-document observation. Existing Document19, PDF30–31, remains the read evidence for the content outline and markup invitation. Neither attached DOCX was acquired, and the outline does not establish any recommendation's wording. The changed URL query parameter is not evidence of a changed PDF version. Preserve source ID `w5-enc-s-foi` and append this narrower observation; do not duplicate the source or invent an original PDF hash.\n\nBounded searches covered the exact AttachmentA/B filenames, the distinctive draft title, FOI25139/LOG118 plus decision terms, and a Right to Know domain query. Exact filename results returned the official email record, not a downloadable draft. The genuinely new public path was the Common Sense Media comments and their publisher listing. No later redline, disposition table, decision schedule or underlying October draft emerged within that search boundary. This is not an exhaustive absence finding.\n\nThe timing matters: October2025 lies outside FOI25139's January–June2025 window. The new comments demonstrate a later review opportunity but cannot establish when particular final text appeared. Three obtainable record families are now precisely identified: the two named May DOCX files with returned edits; FOI25139's decision and schedule explaining attachment treatment; and the October review invitation, circulated draft, receipt and comment-disposition records. The separating observation is a dated version/redline with an attributed change and editorial disposition. A refusal, an already-existing passage or a rejected suggestion would narrow the influence claim.\n\nStopping condition met: named records sharpened, release scope and unresolved exemptions recorded, and one new contributor-owned public path acquired and read. No unchanged GET retry of the toolkit or original FOI PDF, no outreach, submissions, payment or canonical edits. Toolkit technical-reference tracing belongs to the root lane.\n\nLocal custody: `draft-csm-comments.pdf`, `draft-csm-filings.html` and `draft-capture-manifest.json` retain originals and hashes. `draft-foi-filenames-index-extract.json` and `draft-disclosure-index-extract.json` are expressly derivative captures. `draft-candidate.json` proposes four new nodes, seven edges, three new sources, one stable-source observation update and three leads. Context nodes are carried only for validation and must not replace canonical context. No hypothesis of funding or donor control is added.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-draft-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings",
        "title": "Membership and US tax-return seam — 8 September 2026",
        "description": "The new public record is ICMEC US's signed 2023 Form 990, recovered from the live US annual-financial index. It supplies a specific inter-entity transaction category and a tax-return characterization that need reconciliation. It does not reveal who joined the Australian company, what resolution took effect on 6 July 2023, or donor reserved rights. Those memb",
        "html": "<p>The new public record is ICMEC US&#x27;s signed 2023 Form 990, recovered from the live US annual-financial index. It supplies a specific inter-entity transaction category and a tax-return characterization that need reconciliation. It does not reveal who joined the Australian company, what resolution took effect on 6 July 2023, or donor reserved rights. Those membership questions have reached a bounded public-record frontier.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-new-return-establishes\">What the new return establishes</h2>\n<p>The return covers calendar 2023; its officer signature is dated 6 December 2024 (PDF 1). This is the publisher-hosted signed public copy; no IRS receipt or acceptance was independently read. Schedule R Part IV (PDF 50), Australian row, lists ICMEC as direct controlling entity, C CORP as tax classification, 100% ownership and controlled-entity Yes. Its reported shares of income and end-of-year assets are USD 182,463 and USD 13,922,178. These are the filing&#x27;s entries; they are not new proof of Australian legal ownership or of control continuing after 6 July.</p>\n<p>Schedule R Part V (PDF 51), Australian row, reports USD 868,571 under transaction code L and valuation method FMV. Code L covers services, membership or fundraising solicitations for a related organization. Loan categories D and E are marked No. The amount therefore must not be called an Australian loan. It also cannot yet be treated as a cash payment, service fee received, grant, donor-directed expenditure or price for a specific project.</p>\n<p>The 2023 IRS instructions are the relevant interpretive record. Their PDF 6, Part V line 2, columns (c)–(d), defines the amount using fair market value of what the filer provided or received, whichever was higher. The return alone does not identify the underlying service, cash direction or agreement. The Australian and Singapore rows must remain separate. The return&#x27;s USD 13,922,178 share of assets is not directly comparable to the audit&#x27;s USD 13,519,626 net assets removed from consolidation; they differ in gross/net basis and their precise period alignment remains unresolved.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-period-question-remains-real-but-bounded\">The period question remains real, but bounded</h2>\n<p>The IRS&#x27;s 2023 Schedule R instructions PDF 1, Relationships, require disclosure for relationships existing at any time during the tax year. Australia&#x27;s presence on Schedule R is therefore compatible with the US audit&#x27;s loss of control on 6 July 2023. Presence alone creates no contradiction.</p>\n<p>There is a narrower unresolved issue in the 100% entry. Instructions PDF 5, Part IV column (h), use the end of the related organization&#x27;s tax year ending with or within the US filer&#x27;s year; column (g) has the corresponding year-end asset rule. A different Australian tax year or a filing-basis explanation could matter. We must not invent one. Targeted reuse of the already captured July-2023 constitution, clause 66 (PDF 21), and March-2025 constitution, clause 66 (PDF 19), shows a default 1 January–31 December financial year, changeable by directors&#x27; resolution. These are reused sources, not new constitution findings, and still do not establish exact adoption on 6 July or absence of a year-change resolution.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to an actual continued-control reading is a tax-reporting basis or timing difference, including the related entity&#x27;s applicable period and completion method; stale or mistaken completion also remains possible. Neither can be selected from the return alone. The discriminating record is the Schedule R supporting workpaper identifying the Australian period, ownership/control basis and transaction L ledger, read with the executed membership-change instruments and Australian component statements. Do not allege a false return, continuing control, or a resolved audit contradiction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"membership-search-boundary-and-reopening-condition\">Membership search boundary and reopening condition</h2>\n<p>Direct Australian publisher WordPress media searches for resolution, agm and membership, plus pages/posts searches for annual general, each returned HTTP 200 and an empty array. These are five bounded metadata queries at one publisher, not five independent negative confirmations and not proof the documents do not exist. Targeted external search results did not produce an actual admission/adoption instrument. The independent US annual-financial route produced the return, but the inspected Form 990 Part VI and Schedule O concern US governance and do not supply the Australian membership chronology.</p>\n<p>Park further public acquisition of the membership branch until an actual member-register extract, admission/resignation/amendment resolution, signed adopted constitution, or equivalent transition instrument becomes publicly available through an authorized independent publisher. The Australian company secretary and board records remain the direct record holders; the US former-parent legal archive is a counterpart route. The return names Shawn Valentine as its books-and-records contact (PDF 6 line 20), a filing-period custodian selector rather than a verified current role. The component statements/report already acknowledged by the US auditor remain a concrete missing record, not a speculative document class.</p>\n<p>No ACNC route was accessed or retried. No paid search, outreach or policy-404 retry was performed. No fresh donor reserved-rights instrument was obtained. The absence of one from these routes does not establish that none exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-read-scope\">Custody and read scope</h2>\n<p>Original bytes and SHA-256 hashes are in membership-capture-manifest.json. The US return&#x27;s ancestry is the actual link on the live ICMEC US annual-financial index, not an ACNC source or mirror. The 2023 IRS instructions came directly from irs.gov. Australian metadata queries came directly from the publisher&#x27;s established public API.</p>\n<p>US return: inspected PDF 1 and 6, PDF 45–48 Schedule O, and PDF 49–52 Schedule R; relevant PDF 1, 6, 48, 49, 50, 51 and 52 rendered and read, with PDF 47 also retained. Plain extraction was used because layout extraction split words into letters. Critical entries are on the original page 50 and 51 renders. IRS instructions: PDF 1 Relationships, PDF 2 control definitions, PDF 5 Part IV columns (d)–(i), and PDF 6 Part V line 2 read; no entire-document reading claim.</p>\n<p>Exact reused sources: w4-fin-s-fs2023 (audit findings from prior wave); w5-gov-s-constitution2023 clause 66/PDF 21 and w5-gov-s-constitution2025 clause 66/PDF 19 newly read for this interpretation. The current IRS Schedule R instruction webpage applies to 2024 and later; it was excluded as authority for the 2023 return, and the archived 2023 instructions were used instead.</p>",
        "path": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/membership-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-member-s-financial-index",
          "w6-member-s-us9902023",
          "w6-member-s-irs2023",
          "w6-member-s-media-resolution",
          "w6-member-s-media-agm",
          "w6-member-s-media-membership",
          "w6-member-s-pages-agm",
          "w6-member-s-posts-agm"
        ],
        "markdown": "The new public record is ICMEC US's signed 2023 Form 990, recovered from the live US annual-financial index. It supplies a specific inter-entity transaction category and a tax-return characterization that need reconciliation. It does not reveal who joined the Australian company, what resolution took effect on 6 July 2023, or donor reserved rights. Those membership questions have reached a bounded public-record frontier.\n\n## What the new return establishes\n\nThe return covers calendar 2023; its officer signature is dated 6 December 2024 (PDF 1). This is the publisher-hosted signed public copy; no IRS receipt or acceptance was independently read. Schedule R Part IV (PDF 50), Australian row, lists ICMEC as direct controlling entity, C CORP as tax classification, 100% ownership and controlled-entity Yes. Its reported shares of income and end-of-year assets are USD 182,463 and USD 13,922,178. These are the filing's entries; they are not new proof of Australian legal ownership or of control continuing after 6 July.\n\nSchedule R Part V (PDF 51), Australian row, reports USD 868,571 under transaction code L and valuation method FMV. Code L covers services, membership or fundraising solicitations for a related organization. Loan categories D and E are marked No. The amount therefore must not be called an Australian loan. It also cannot yet be treated as a cash payment, service fee received, grant, donor-directed expenditure or price for a specific project.\n\nThe 2023 IRS instructions are the relevant interpretive record. Their PDF 6, Part V line 2, columns (c)–(d), defines the amount using fair market value of what the filer provided or received, whichever was higher. The return alone does not identify the underlying service, cash direction or agreement. The Australian and Singapore rows must remain separate. The return's USD 13,922,178 share of assets is not directly comparable to the audit's USD 13,519,626 net assets removed from consolidation; they differ in gross/net basis and their precise period alignment remains unresolved.\n\n## The period question remains real, but bounded\n\nThe IRS's 2023 Schedule R instructions PDF 1, Relationships, require disclosure for relationships existing at any time during the tax year. Australia's presence on Schedule R is therefore compatible with the US audit's loss of control on 6 July 2023. Presence alone creates no contradiction.\n\nThere is a narrower unresolved issue in the 100% entry. Instructions PDF 5, Part IV column (h), use the end of the related organization's tax year ending with or within the US filer's year; column (g) has the corresponding year-end asset rule. A different Australian tax year or a filing-basis explanation could matter. We must not invent one. Targeted reuse of the already captured July-2023 constitution, clause 66 (PDF 21), and March-2025 constitution, clause 66 (PDF 19), shows a default 1 January–31 December financial year, changeable by directors' resolution. These are reused sources, not new constitution findings, and still do not establish exact adoption on 6 July or absence of a year-change resolution.\n\nThe strongest rival to an actual continued-control reading is a tax-reporting basis or timing difference, including the related entity's applicable period and completion method; stale or mistaken completion also remains possible. Neither can be selected from the return alone. The discriminating record is the Schedule R supporting workpaper identifying the Australian period, ownership/control basis and transaction L ledger, read with the executed membership-change instruments and Australian component statements. Do not allege a false return, continuing control, or a resolved audit contradiction.\n\n## Membership search boundary and reopening condition\n\nDirect Australian publisher WordPress media searches for resolution, agm and membership, plus pages/posts searches for annual general, each returned HTTP 200 and an empty array. These are five bounded metadata queries at one publisher, not five independent negative confirmations and not proof the documents do not exist. Targeted external search results did not produce an actual admission/adoption instrument. The independent US annual-financial route produced the return, but the inspected Form 990 Part VI and Schedule O concern US governance and do not supply the Australian membership chronology.\n\nPark further public acquisition of the membership branch until an actual member-register extract, admission/resignation/amendment resolution, signed adopted constitution, or equivalent transition instrument becomes publicly available through an authorized independent publisher. The Australian company secretary and board records remain the direct record holders; the US former-parent legal archive is a counterpart route. The return names Shawn Valentine as its books-and-records contact (PDF 6 line 20), a filing-period custodian selector rather than a verified current role. The component statements/report already acknowledged by the US auditor remain a concrete missing record, not a speculative document class.\n\nNo ACNC route was accessed or retried. No paid search, outreach or policy-404 retry was performed. No fresh donor reserved-rights instrument was obtained. The absence of one from these routes does not establish that none exists.\n\n## Custody and read scope\n\nOriginal bytes and SHA-256 hashes are in membership-capture-manifest.json. The US return's ancestry is the actual link on the live ICMEC US annual-financial index, not an ACNC source or mirror. The 2023 IRS instructions came directly from irs.gov. Australian metadata queries came directly from the publisher's established public API.\n\nUS return: inspected PDF 1 and 6, PDF 45–48 Schedule O, and PDF 49–52 Schedule R; relevant PDF 1, 6, 48, 49, 50, 51 and 52 rendered and read, with PDF 47 also retained. Plain extraction was used because layout extraction split words into letters. Critical entries are on the original page 50 and 51 renders. IRS instructions: PDF 1 Relationships, PDF 2 control definitions, PDF 5 Part IV columns (d)–(i), and PDF 6 Part V line 2 read; no entire-document reading claim.\n\nExact reused sources: w4-fin-s-fs2023 (audit findings from prior wave); w5-gov-s-constitution2023 clause 66/PDF 21 and w5-gov-s-constitution2025 clause 66/PDF 19 newly read for this interpretation. The current IRS Schedule R instruction webpage applies to 2024 and later; it was excluded as authority for the 2023 return, and the archived 2023 instructions were used instead.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-membership-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings",
        "title": "The earlier encryption-policy route",
        "description": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October",
        "html": "<p>The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.</p>\n<p>The paper advocates technically possible client-side protections, but explicitly disclaims UK government policy or requirements and a complete security analysis (PDF10). Its discussion recognises coercion, database manipulation and mission creep; it reports no evidence for its considered charity-funding capture scenario (PDF41–42). It also points to REPHRAIN&#x27;s separate Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation work (PDF6,56). That is not the later Toolbox award or proof of a common programme. Read cover, selected introduction/executive-summary pages, section6.1 and the opening of section8; no full technical validation claimed. Original arXiv PDF retained.</p>\n<p>The Commission post is an archived policy argument dated 7August2022, not a legal-status determination. Its paragraphs naming Levy and Robinson use the paper to support possible detection within encrypted services. The current page attributes authorship to the Directorate-General for Communication; this investigation does not infer a named commissioner from first-person language. Original HTML retained.</p>\n<p>The eSafety statement predates the 2024 DFC and SaferAI reports. PDF9–10 discusses client-side checks, secure enclaves, on-device detection and homomorphic techniques. It explicitly describes scalability and security concerns, with Levy/Robinson as the countervailing CSS citation. Its advertising-research references are not validation of an operational abuse-detection system. The date is printed on PDF11. This proves prior consideration; it does not prove how the later toolkit was drafted. Original retrieval timed out; the scoped web-reader observation is retained as a derivative, not a PDF capture.</p>\n<p>WeProtect&#x27;s January2024 submission to the Australian draft-standards consultation advocates client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption and secure enclaves while saying the technologies are nascent and require more testing (PDF4). Its disclaimer attributes the position to the Secretariat rather than necessarily to Alliance members (PDF10). Digital Rights Watch&#x27;s opposing submission is dated 21December2023, despite the February2024 upload path. It disputes feasibility and privacy claims (PDF10–14). These are contrasting formal inputs, not proof either was adopted. Both scoped observations are derivatives after one original-retrieval timeout each.</p>\n<p>The 2026 toolkit itself still includes general scale, latency and specialist-tool limitations in its common-barriers discussion (PDF11 / printed20–21). Consequently, we cannot claim all caveats disappeared. The specific homomorphic-encryption citation29 remains unresolved. A homomorphic-learning article in the same journal volume is only a title/topic match: no evidence identifies it as the intended citation, and no Ant Group influence node is earned. The earlier policy route is the stronger finding.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is an actual reference-manager entry or tracked source substitution for citation29, together with comment dispositions connecting the 2023 statement or 2024 submissions to the later toolkit. Shared terminology alone does not establish that transmission.</p>",
        "path": "australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08/reference-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w6-ref-s-paper",
          "w6-ref-s-ec",
          "w6-ref-s-position",
          "w6-ref-s-wp",
          "w6-ref-s-drw"
        ],
        "markdown": "The dated route reaches back before either 2024 report previously traced. A July2022 paper by Ian Levy and Crispin Robinson identifies their posts at the UK National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ. The European Commission cited it in a public defence of its child-sexual-abuse proposal on 7August2022. eSafety cited it in an encryption position dated 13October2023. These are actual citations by public authorities, not merely institutional proximity.\n\nThe paper advocates technically possible client-side protections, but explicitly disclaims UK government policy or requirements and a complete security analysis (PDF10). Its discussion recognises coercion, database manipulation and mission creep; it reports no evidence for its considered charity-funding capture scenario (PDF41–42). It also points to REPHRAIN's separate Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation work (PDF6,56). That is not the later Toolbox award or proof of a common programme. Read cover, selected introduction/executive-summary pages, section6.1 and the opening of section8; no full technical validation claimed. Original arXiv PDF retained.\n\nThe Commission post is an archived policy argument dated 7August2022, not a legal-status determination. Its paragraphs naming Levy and Robinson use the paper to support possible detection within encrypted services. The current page attributes authorship to the Directorate-General for Communication; this investigation does not infer a named commissioner from first-person language. Original HTML retained.\n\nThe eSafety statement predates the 2024 DFC and SaferAI reports. PDF9–10 discusses client-side checks, secure enclaves, on-device detection and homomorphic techniques. It explicitly describes scalability and security concerns, with Levy/Robinson as the countervailing CSS citation. Its advertising-research references are not validation of an operational abuse-detection system. The date is printed on PDF11. This proves prior consideration; it does not prove how the later toolkit was drafted. Original retrieval timed out; the scoped web-reader observation is retained as a derivative, not a PDF capture.\n\nWeProtect's January2024 submission to the Australian draft-standards consultation advocates client-side scanning, homomorphic encryption and secure enclaves while saying the technologies are nascent and require more testing (PDF4). Its disclaimer attributes the position to the Secretariat rather than necessarily to Alliance members (PDF10). Digital Rights Watch's opposing submission is dated 21December2023, despite the February2024 upload path. It disputes feasibility and privacy claims (PDF10–14). These are contrasting formal inputs, not proof either was adopted. Both scoped observations are derivatives after one original-retrieval timeout each.\n\nThe 2026 toolkit itself still includes general scale, latency and specialist-tool limitations in its common-barriers discussion (PDF11 / printed20–21). Consequently, we cannot claim all caveats disappeared. The specific homomorphic-encryption citation29 remains unresolved. A homomorphic-learning article in the same journal volume is only a title/topic match: no evidence identifies it as the intended citation, and no Ant Group influence node is earned. The earlier policy route is the stronger finding.\n\nThe next discriminating record is an actual reference-manager entry or tracked source substitution for citation29, together with comment dispositions connecting the 2023 statement or 2024 submissions to the later toolkit. Shared terminology alone does not establish that transmission.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-seams-wave-2026-09-08-reference-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-5rights-findings",
        "title": "5Rights amendment attachment: the archive route",
        "description": "The August 5, 2022 proposed-author-amendment attachment was not recovered. This pass tested California State Archives public discovery, rather than repeating the FARA filing index. The Archives describes committee bill files containing amendments and correspondence, and author files that may contain original-sponsor correspondence. Deposited legislator recor",
        "html": "<p>The August 5, 2022 proposed-author-amendment attachment was not recovered. This pass tested California State Archives public discovery, rather than repeating the FARA filing index. The Archives describes committee bill files containing amendments and correspondence, and author files that may contain original-sponsor correspondence. Deposited legislator records can carry access restrictions. Its public Governor chaptered-bill-file description currently ends at 2018, so it is not proof of custody of the 2022 Newsom file.</p>\n<p>The ordinary portal form was inspected and submitted with AB 2273, Portantino and Senate Appropriations. The first ten of 53 broad AB results and first ten of 37 broad committee results were irrelevant historical material; Portantino returned zero. These results are partial portal coverage, not an exhaustive archival holdings search or proof the attachment is absent. External indexed searches for the exact bill and Skaggs produced analyses and later litigation, not the transmitted draft.</p>\n<p>The practical next record is an accession/box/folder identification for the 2022 Senate Appropriations AB2273 bill file, followed by the July18-August11 proposed-amendment correspondence. Archives Reference Services can identify likely series but says it does not search for a specified document within a series. No request was sent and no paid copying ordered. CapConn and 5Rights remain likely holders of the actual August5 email; archival custody remains to be confirmed.</p>\n<p>Sources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] . HTML captures, ordinary-form results and hashes accompany this note. No new actor, money or authorship edge is earned.</p>",
        "path": "australia-wave-2026-09-08/5rights-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-5r-s-archive-resources",
          "w4-5r-s-reference"
        ],
        "markdown": "The August 5, 2022 proposed-author-amendment attachment was not recovered. This pass tested California State Archives public discovery, rather than repeating the FARA filing index. The Archives describes committee bill files containing amendments and correspondence, and author files that may contain original-sponsor correspondence. Deposited legislator records can carry access restrictions. Its public Governor chaptered-bill-file description currently ends at 2018, so it is not proof of custody of the 2022 Newsom file.\n\nThe ordinary portal form was inspected and submitted with AB 2273, Portantino and Senate Appropriations. The first ten of 53 broad AB results and first ten of 37 broad committee results were irrelevant historical material; Portantino returned zero. These results are partial portal coverage, not an exhaustive archival holdings search or proof the attachment is absent. External indexed searches for the exact bill and Skaggs produced analyses and later litigation, not the transmitted draft.\n\nThe practical next record is an accession/box/folder identification for the 2022 Senate Appropriations AB2273 bill file, followed by the July18-August11 proposed-amendment correspondence. Archives Reference Services can identify likely series but says it does not search for a specified document within a series. No request was sent and no paid copying ordered. CapConn and 5Rights remain likely holders of the actual August5 email; archival custody remains to be confirmed.\n\nSources: http[local research file] ; http[local research file] . HTML captures, ordinary-form results and hashes accompany this note. No new actor, money or authorship edge is earned.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-wave-2026-09-08-5rights-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings",
        "title": "Australian financial/legal lane: a dated separation, an extended grant, and the remaining instrument gap",
        "description": "Read September8,2026 local time. New captures are in this directory, prefixed finance-; original URLs, HTTP outcomes and SHA256 values are in finance-capture-manifest.json. No canonical case or reader edits, outreach, spending or private API access. Registry access stopped at the exact restriction recorded below.",
        "html": "<p>Read September8,2026 local time. New captures are in this directory, prefixed <code>finance-</code>; original URLs, HTTP outcomes and SHA256 values are in <code>finance-capture-manifest.json</code>. No canonical case or reader edits, outreach, spending or private API access. Registry access stopped at the exact restriction recorded below.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-changed\">What changed</h2>\n<p>The strongest new records establish that ICMEC US stopped controlling its Australian affiliate on <strong>6July2023</strong>, with a substantial donor-restricted resource position removed from the consolidated accounts. Separately, Westpac explicitly identifies the original grant as <strong>AUD25million</strong> and reports a later <strong>two-year extension</strong>. Those findings strengthen the history and funding-purpose chain. They still do not supply the Australian grant agreement, permission rights, final term dates, donor-specific ledger allocations or current standalone Australian accounts.</p>\n<h3 id=\"legal-identity-and-the-separation\">Legal identity and the separation</h3>\n<p>[Australian Business Register, ABN86645682828](http[local research file] identifies <strong>INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MISSING &amp; EXPLOITED CHILDREN, AUSTRALIA LTD</strong>, an Australian public company, active from5November2020, ACN645682828. It records business name <strong>Global Centre For Child Protection</strong> from3July2026 under the same ABN. That is an additional trading-name selector, not evidence of a newly created charity or changed legal entity. The current register also dates DGR endorsement to22March2024. These are registry classifications, not findings about individual donations.</p>\n<p>The [2023 ICMEC consolidated financial statements](http[local research file] Note1, say the US body created the Australian company inNovember2020 and ceased being its <strong>sole member</strong> on6July2023. Note8, PDFp17/printed16, separately states it <strong>no longer controls</strong> Australia. “No longer sole member” does not establish complete withdrawal from membership. The former affiliate&#x27;s late2021 operational-establishment account is compatible with earlier legal incorporation.</p>\n<p>The same audit&#x27;s Note8 removes USD13,519,626 net assets from consolidation. Components include cash4,131,064, investments3,337,000 and grants/contributions receivable6,359,338, plus other assets and liabilities. ExhibitB, PDFp7/printed6, records the deconsolidation entry as <strong>+1,408,807 without donor restrictions; −14,928,433 with donor restrictions; −13,519,626 total</strong>. These are accounting removals, not a new grant or bank transfer. The receivable is not assigned to Westpac by the note. The entry is not a present Australian solvency assessment.</p>\n<p>The auditor&#x27;s report, PDFp3/printed2, explicitly relies on another auditor&#x27;s Australian financial statements for the period ended6July2023, with additional conversion procedures. This identifies a specific underlying record that exists; that component report was not obtained here. The [2022 consolidated statements](http[local research file] PDFpp9–10/printed8–9, explain the former consolidation basis and translation of Australian financial statements into US dollars. Do not compare these USD balances directly with AUD25million. Their programme-restricted aggregate is for the then-consolidated group, not a Westpac-specific Australian grant schedule.</p>\n<h3 id=\"westpacs-own-terms-history\">Westpac&#x27;s own terms history</h3>\n<p>[Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement](http[local research file] expressly labels the award <strong>$25million(AUD)</strong>. Currency is now directly documented for the original award, upgrading the earlier context-based inference. PDFp21/printed20 describes a three-year grant, managed by ICMEC, for designing, building, deploying and maintaining a platform and analytical tools using cross-industry data. This is the bank&#x27;s stated grant purpose; the executed instrument&#x27;s enforceable restrictions remain unavailable. The passage relates the programme to possible remediation following AUSTRAC&#x27;s2019 allegations, rather than describing a court order requiring this charity payment.</p>\n<p>[Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement](http[local research file] says the initially three-year AUD25million partnership was extended for <strong>an additional two years</strong> during the reporting year. It does not announce another AUD25million or state a new payment schedule. PDFp17/printed16 also describes a four-year relationship to that point. An extension is therefore documented, but the full contractual chronology is not resolved by simple addition.</p>\n<p>The [current programme page](http[local research file] still describes the three-year grant and priorFY20 scoping. It is undated historical programme copy on a currently accessible page. The retained [2024 Safer Children report](http[local research file] describes a six-year commitment/partnership. Preserve each source period and the now-known extension. Possible explanations include scoping versus award clocks, changed delivery periods, later changes, or stale/inconsistent summaries; none is selected as fact. The signed initial agreement and amendments can distinguish them.</p>\n<h3 id=\"where-this-does-and-does-not-reach-operating-capacity\">Where this does and does not reach operating capacity</h3>\n<p>The bank&#x27;s stated grant purpose now explicitly reaches platform construction and maintenance. It does not identify Kablamo, a licence, a hosting charge, a software-capitalisation balance or a SaferAI policy allocation. No identifiable Lighthouse/Kablamo expense line was recovered in the acquired financial statements. The USD20,699 fixed-asset balance at deconsolidation cannot be renamed Lighthouse software. Later Australian operating expenses are outside the US consolidation perimeter.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to funder-directed policy is a restricted technical-capacity grant supporting an operationally independent recipient, with programme development and later advocacy chosen under the recipient&#x27;s governance. Donor selection and renewal dependence can coexist with that explanation. A competing donor-direction model predicts actual reserved approvals, conditions, intervention correspondence or allocation-linked deliverables. This pass recovered a stated technical purpose and an extension, not those decision rights.</p>\n<h2 id=\"access-receipt-and-bounded-coverage\">Access receipt and bounded coverage</h2>\n<p>Public search located the exact [ACNC profile](http[local research file] and [AIS2024 record](http[local research file] Their search/web-reader shells establish titles/locators only; the financial contents were not read. Ordinary GETs each timed out after40seconds. One public-browser fallback then returned this exact refusal:</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>This is a <strong>browser admin-policy verification failure</strong>, not an automatic approval review rejection or a financial-report absence. All ACNC retrieval stopped; no indirect workaround was attempted. The independently published US audits are substitutes for their particular disclosures, not ACNC or standalone Australian filings. An independently attempted Australian governance URL returned404; its cached search description is not treated as a live constitution. No repeat route was attempted.</p>\n<p>Read scope: ABN live entity/business-name/tax-status fields; FY21 statement PDFpp5/21; FY24 statement PDFpp17/28; current Westpac ICMEC subsection; US2023 audit PDFpp3,7,9–17 at the organisation, conversion, restriction and deconsolidation passages; US2022 component-audit, consolidation, currency and restriction notes. These are not exhaustive audits of the financial statements or the programmes. Key FY21 currency and US2023 tables were visually checked. Other captured text is available but should not be imported as wholly reviewed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-remaining-obtainable-records\">The remaining obtainable records</h2>\n<p>The highest-value specific financial record is the <strong>Australian component financial statements and auditor report for the period ended6July2023</strong>, expressly identified by the US audit. The Australian finance/board custodian and the consolidating auditor received or hold that record. It can reveal the Australian grant receivable, restrictions and accounting transition without inventing a cash transfer. Subsequent standalone Australian statements and the publicly lodged AIS attachments, if available after the access restriction clears, can extend the picture into Lighthouse&#x27;s operating period.</p>\n<p>The <strong>executed Westpac–ICMEC grant, FY24 extension and any novation associated with the2023 separation</strong> should identify legal grantee(s), start/end dates, drawdowns, remaining promises, reporting, permitted costs, clawback, termination and renewal rights. Likely holders are Westpac&#x27;s programme/legal records custodian and the relevant ICMEC finance/legal archives. A novation is a candidate record, not a document proved to exist merely because control changed.</p>\n<p>To join funding to the technology, obtain the Australian <strong>project ledger, intangible-asset register, contract and maintenance invoices</strong> with donor/project codes. They would distinguish grant-funded development, ordinary operating support and a separately financed service, and permit a legitimate comparison with the vendor&#x27;s public account. A supplier statement alone cannot allocate an expense.</p>\n<p>Finally, the <strong>membership register, constitutional amendments and member/board resolutions effective6July2023</strong> can specify who obtained or retained membership and appointment rights. The audit proves changed sole-membership/control status; it does not name the replacement members. These records are likely held by the Australian company secretary and the US former-parent archive. No holder requests have been sent.</p>",
        "path": "australia-wave-2026-09-08/finance-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-fin-s-abn",
          "w4-fin-s-fs2022",
          "w4-fin-s-fs2023",
          "w4-fin-s-westpac2021",
          "w4-fin-s-westpac2024",
          "w4-fin-s-programme",
          "w4-fin-s-acnc-profile",
          "w4-fin-s-acnc-ais2024",
          "w4-fin-s-governance404"
        ],
        "markdown": "Read September8,2026 local time. New captures are in this directory, prefixed `finance-`; original URLs, HTTP outcomes and SHA256 values are in `finance-capture-manifest.json`. No canonical case or reader edits, outreach, spending or private API access. Registry access stopped at the exact restriction recorded below.\n\n## What changed\n\nThe strongest new records establish that ICMEC US stopped controlling its Australian affiliate on **6July2023**, with a substantial donor-restricted resource position removed from the consolidated accounts. Separately, Westpac explicitly identifies the original grant as **AUD25million** and reports a later **two-year extension**. Those findings strengthen the history and funding-purpose chain. They still do not supply the Australian grant agreement, permission rights, final term dates, donor-specific ledger allocations or current standalone Australian accounts.\n\n### Legal identity and the separation\n\nAustralian Business Register, ABN86645682828 (see source references) identifies **INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MISSING & EXPLOITED CHILDREN, AUSTRALIA LTD**, an Australian public company, active from5November2020, ACN645682828. It records business name **Global Centre For Child Protection** from3July2026 under the same ABN. That is an additional trading-name selector, not evidence of a newly created charity or changed legal entity. The current register also dates DGR endorsement to22March2024. These are registry classifications, not findings about individual donations.\n\nThe 2023 ICMEC consolidated financial statements (see source references) Note1, say the US body created the Australian company inNovember2020 and ceased being its **sole member** on6July2023. Note8, PDFp17/printed16, separately states it **no longer controls** Australia. “No longer sole member” does not establish complete withdrawal from membership. The former affiliate's late2021 operational-establishment account is compatible with earlier legal incorporation.\n\nThe same audit's Note8 removes USD13,519,626 net assets from consolidation. Components include cash4,131,064, investments3,337,000 and grants/contributions receivable6,359,338, plus other assets and liabilities. ExhibitB, PDFp7/printed6, records the deconsolidation entry as **+1,408,807 without donor restrictions; −14,928,433 with donor restrictions; −13,519,626 total**. These are accounting removals, not a new grant or bank transfer. The receivable is not assigned to Westpac by the note. The entry is not a present Australian solvency assessment.\n\nThe auditor's report, PDFp3/printed2, explicitly relies on another auditor's Australian financial statements for the period ended6July2023, with additional conversion procedures. This identifies a specific underlying record that exists; that component report was not obtained here. The 2022 consolidated statements (see source references) PDFpp9–10/printed8–9, explain the former consolidation basis and translation of Australian financial statements into US dollars. Do not compare these USD balances directly with AUD25million. Their programme-restricted aggregate is for the then-consolidated group, not a Westpac-specific Australian grant schedule.\n\n### Westpac's own terms history\n\nWestpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement (see source references) expressly labels the award **$25million(AUD)**. Currency is now directly documented for the original award, upgrading the earlier context-based inference. PDFp21/printed20 describes a three-year grant, managed by ICMEC, for designing, building, deploying and maintaining a platform and analytical tools using cross-industry data. This is the bank's stated grant purpose; the executed instrument's enforceable restrictions remain unavailable. The passage relates the programme to possible remediation following AUSTRAC's2019 allegations, rather than describing a court order requiring this charity payment.\n\nWestpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement (see source references) says the initially three-year AUD25million partnership was extended for **an additional two years** during the reporting year. It does not announce another AUD25million or state a new payment schedule. PDFp17/printed16 also describes a four-year relationship to that point. An extension is therefore documented, but the full contractual chronology is not resolved by simple addition.\n\nThe current programme page (see source references) still describes the three-year grant and priorFY20 scoping. It is undated historical programme copy on a currently accessible page. The retained 2024 Safer Children report (see source references) describes a six-year commitment/partnership. Preserve each source period and the now-known extension. Possible explanations include scoping versus award clocks, changed delivery periods, later changes, or stale/inconsistent summaries; none is selected as fact. The signed initial agreement and amendments can distinguish them.\n\n### Where this does and does not reach operating capacity\n\nThe bank's stated grant purpose now explicitly reaches platform construction and maintenance. It does not identify Kablamo, a licence, a hosting charge, a software-capitalisation balance or a SaferAI policy allocation. No identifiable Lighthouse/Kablamo expense line was recovered in the acquired financial statements. The USD20,699 fixed-asset balance at deconsolidation cannot be renamed Lighthouse software. Later Australian operating expenses are outside the US consolidation perimeter.\n\nThe strongest rival to funder-directed policy is a restricted technical-capacity grant supporting an operationally independent recipient, with programme development and later advocacy chosen under the recipient's governance. Donor selection and renewal dependence can coexist with that explanation. A competing donor-direction model predicts actual reserved approvals, conditions, intervention correspondence or allocation-linked deliverables. This pass recovered a stated technical purpose and an extension, not those decision rights.\n\n## Access receipt and bounded coverage\n\nPublic search located the exact ACNC profile (see source references) and AIS2024 record (see source references) Their search/web-reader shells establish titles/locators only; the financial contents were not read. Ordinary GETs each timed out after40seconds. One public-browser fallback then returned this exact refusal:\n\n> Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.\n\nThis is a **browser admin-policy verification failure**, not an automatic approval review rejection or a financial-report absence. All ACNC retrieval stopped; no indirect workaround was attempted. The independently published US audits are substitutes for their particular disclosures, not ACNC or standalone Australian filings. An independently attempted Australian governance URL returned404; its cached search description is not treated as a live constitution. No repeat route was attempted.\n\nRead scope: ABN live entity/business-name/tax-status fields; FY21 statement PDFpp5/21; FY24 statement PDFpp17/28; current Westpac ICMEC subsection; US2023 audit PDFpp3,7,9–17 at the organisation, conversion, restriction and deconsolidation passages; US2022 component-audit, consolidation, currency and restriction notes. These are not exhaustive audits of the financial statements or the programmes. Key FY21 currency and US2023 tables were visually checked. Other captured text is available but should not be imported as wholly reviewed.\n\n## The remaining obtainable records\n\nThe highest-value specific financial record is the **Australian component financial statements and auditor report for the period ended6July2023**, expressly identified by the US audit. The Australian finance/board custodian and the consolidating auditor received or hold that record. It can reveal the Australian grant receivable, restrictions and accounting transition without inventing a cash transfer. Subsequent standalone Australian statements and the publicly lodged AIS attachments, if available after the access restriction clears, can extend the picture into Lighthouse's operating period.\n\nThe **executed Westpac–ICMEC grant, FY24 extension and any novation associated with the2023 separation** should identify legal grantee(s), start/end dates, drawdowns, remaining promises, reporting, permitted costs, clawback, termination and renewal rights. Likely holders are Westpac's programme/legal records custodian and the relevant ICMEC finance/legal archives. A novation is a candidate record, not a document proved to exist merely because control changed.\n\nTo join funding to the technology, obtain the Australian **project ledger, intangible-asset register, contract and maintenance invoices** with donor/project codes. They would distinguish grant-funded development, ordinary operating support and a separately financed service, and permit a legitimate comparison with the vendor's public account. A supplier statement alone cannot allocate an expense.\n\nFinally, the **membership register, constitutional amendments and member/board resolutions effective6July2023** can specify who obtained or retained membership and appointment rights. The audit proves changed sole-membership/control status; it does not name the replacement members. These records are likely held by the Australian company secretary and the US former-parent archive. No holder requests have been sent.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-wave-2026-09-08-finance-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings",
        "title": "Lighthouse: the application, its operating support and the missing decision record",
        "description": "Bounded public-source acquisition, 8 September 2026 local time. The candidate adds seven nodes, eight relations and six sources, reusing the existing Australian entity, Lighthouse and 2024-25 report IDs. No canonical file was edited.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded public-source acquisition, 8 September 2026 local time. The candidate adds seven nodes, eight relations and six sources, reusing the existing Australian entity, Lighthouse and 2024-25 report IDs. No canonical file was edited.</p>\n<p>The new evidence earns a named delivery/support relationship and a dated access restriction. It does not yet earn a Lighthouse-to-account-blocking relationship. A separate documented closure operation is preserved alongside it.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-application-does-and-what-the-counts-count\">What the application does — and what the counts count</h2>\n<p>The existing ICMEC Australia impact report, PDF p12 / printed pp22-23, describes a queryable application that combines suspected-activity records with analytics and geographic/network context. It reports dozens of users and just under eight million records processed during 1 July 2024–30 June 2025, including over 70,000 geolocated to Australia. These are records, not unique people, proven offences, alerts sent or bank accounts blocked. The report does not name the feed suppliers. Its proposed university analysis concerns future research, not a demonstrated evaluation of downstream decisions. [Existing original report](http[local research file] scoped local extract: <code>lighthouse-existing-impact-page12.txt</code>.</p>\n<p>The current Our Work page describes expansion beyond Lighthouse into additional sovereign, real-time data streams as a plan. That language does not establish deployed expansion or a population-wide identification scheme. Its audience remains organisations and frontline professionals. [Current service description](http[local research file] CSEA data insights and analytics.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-named-builder-and-a-decision-role\">A named builder and a decision role</h2>\n<p>Kablamo&#x27;s commercial case study reports building Lighthouse, subsequent annually renewed Product Care support, and technical delivery decisions by an unnamed ICMEC product owner. It names AWS infrastructure and NextGIS mapping. No fee, signed instrument or independent acceptance record was recovered. The account and client quotation are one commercial source family; its broad claims of protection outcomes are not an evaluation. The unnamed owner is not reconciled with a named executive or assigned policy/bank-action authority. [Vendor account](http[local research file] The Approach / The Results; <code>lighthouse-kablamo.txt</code>, lines 34-59.</p>\n<h2 id=\"access-and-correction-what-is-actually-public\">Access and correction: what is actually public</h2>\n<p>The original 30 October 2024 symposium programme states Lighthouse use was restricted to Australian soil. Its introductory session was limited to specified Australian regulators, financial/CSE professionals, banks/payment remitters and child-protection law enforcement. That is a real published access boundary, not proof of the current licence or of who attended or held accounts. I inspected the original PDF&#x27;s second page visually: [Programme](http[local research file] <code>lighthouse-symposium2024-page2.png</code>.</p>\n<p>The public privacy-policy URL returned HTTP 404 on ordinary acquisition. Search-index text describes a policy updated 3 July 2024, including data-product access and general access/correction/complaint provisions, but the current original was not acquired. This is not treated as a current intelligence-feed licence or proof that an adverse inference is corrected throughout recipient systems. The current footer&#x27;s Terms of use link is only <code>#</code>. Neither observation proves such rules do not exist. No retention schedule, named provider licence, match-quality assessment, recipient permission matrix or correction-propagation procedure was recovered.</p>\n<h2 id=\"account-closures-exist-in-the-public-record-under-a-separately-named-operation\">Account closures exist in the public record — under a separately named operation</h2>\n<p>ICMEC&#x27;s July 2026 No Bank Left Behind paper discusses closure outcomes under Operation Huntsman and cites AUSTRAC. Its Hume and Beyond Bank passages describe collaboration, not a specific Lighthouse alert followed by an account decision. [Paper](http[local research file] pp1-3,5-9.</p>\n<p>The paper labels the relevant AUSTRAC reference 2024. That URL now redirects to an official release dated 15 September 2025, which reports more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments closed since June 2022 through the joint ACCCE–AUSTRAC Operation Huntsman. This is an agency-reported cumulative outcome, not an inspected bank ledger. The paper&#x27;s older 1,800-plus callout and the current page must retain their different dates/versions. The cited historical version was not recovered. [Current AUSTRAC release](http[local research file] date and Operation Huntsman paragraph.</p>\n<p>No recovered record joins Lighthouse to those closures. That is a missing attribution, not proof Lighthouse was uninvolved. The candidate therefore creates a separate Huntsman operation and aggregate outcome, with no Lighthouse edge. The paper&#x27;s closure passage derives from the AUSTRAC publication family; it is not a second independent confirmation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discriminating-next-record-and-alternative\">Discriminating next record and alternative</h2>\n<p>The highest-value unacquired family is a de-identified, versioned Lighthouse query/alert-to-decision audit trail held by ICMEC and a recipient institution: input provenance and caveats, human review, corroborating evidence, action or no action, and correction. Pair it with supplier licence schedules, access terms, retention rules and correction/withdrawal propagation. No abuse data, account numbers or identifiable case material is needed to test the mechanism.</p>\n<p>A realistic alternative is an ordinary intelligence-support service: analysts use Lighthouse as context while existing transaction monitoring, other intelligence and institutional duties independently determine investigations, reporting or closures. The acquired records support that interpretation at least as readily as automatic blocking or donor-controlled enforcement. Kablamo&#x27;s support contract is a separate attainable family for service dependency, access privileges, handover and decision rights.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-reading-limits\">Custody and reading limits</h2>\n<p><code>lighthouse-capture-manifest.json</code> records original HTML/PDF bytes, URLs, hashes and failures. The AUSTRAC ordinary-download route timed out; its successful official web-reader extraction is preserved as <code>lighthouse-austrac-web-extract.json</code>, explicitly not raw HTML. Privacy remains an unavailable original; no substantive candidate edge relies on it. The research-partnership page was captured and scoped for Lighthouse output; no such evaluated output was found there, and its other research was not promoted into this lane.</p>\n<p>The bounded search included exact Lighthouse/ICMEC queries, public service/privacy material, the builder, the original programme, the current research page and AUSTRAC/AFP-targeted counterpart searches. These searches did not recover the missing institution-level Lighthouse outcome or licence record; they are not an exhaustive proof of absence. Acquisition stops at the specified holder frontier. <code>lighthouse-candidate-check.json</code> confirms candidate IDs, endpoint/source references and absence of baseline collisions; it does not certify the underlying claims.</p>",
        "path": "australia-wave-2026-09-08/lighthouse-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-lh-s-kablamo",
          "w4-lh-s-symposium2024",
          "w4-lh-s-our-work",
          "w4-lh-s-no-bank-paper",
          "w4-lh-s-austrac-huntsman",
          "w4-lh-s-privacy-unavailable"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded public-source acquisition, 8 September 2026 local time. The candidate adds seven nodes, eight relations and six sources, reusing the existing Australian entity, Lighthouse and 2024-25 report IDs. No canonical file was edited.\n\nThe new evidence earns a named delivery/support relationship and a dated access restriction. It does not yet earn a Lighthouse-to-account-blocking relationship. A separate documented closure operation is preserved alongside it.\n\n## What the application does — and what the counts count\n\nThe existing ICMEC Australia impact report, PDF p12 / printed pp22-23, describes a queryable application that combines suspected-activity records with analytics and geographic/network context. It reports dozens of users and just under eight million records processed during 1 July 2024–30 June 2025, including over 70,000 geolocated to Australia. These are records, not unique people, proven offences, alerts sent or bank accounts blocked. The report does not name the feed suppliers. Its proposed university analysis concerns future research, not a demonstrated evaluation of downstream decisions. Existing original report (see source references) scoped local extract: `lighthouse-existing-impact-page12.txt`.\n\nThe current Our Work page describes expansion beyond Lighthouse into additional sovereign, real-time data streams as a plan. That language does not establish deployed expansion or a population-wide identification scheme. Its audience remains organisations and frontline professionals. Current service description (see source references) CSEA data insights and analytics.\n\n## A named builder and a decision role\n\nKablamo's commercial case study reports building Lighthouse, subsequent annually renewed Product Care support, and technical delivery decisions by an unnamed ICMEC product owner. It names AWS infrastructure and NextGIS mapping. No fee, signed instrument or independent acceptance record was recovered. The account and client quotation are one commercial source family; its broad claims of protection outcomes are not an evaluation. The unnamed owner is not reconciled with a named executive or assigned policy/bank-action authority. Vendor account (see source references) The Approach / The Results; `lighthouse-kablamo.txt`, lines 34-59.\n\n## Access and correction: what is actually public\n\nThe original 30 October 2024 symposium programme states Lighthouse use was restricted to Australian soil. Its introductory session was limited to specified Australian regulators, financial/CSE professionals, banks/payment remitters and child-protection law enforcement. That is a real published access boundary, not proof of the current licence or of who attended or held accounts. I inspected the original PDF's second page visually: Programme (see source references) `lighthouse-symposium2024-page2.png`.\n\nThe public privacy-policy URL returned HTTP 404 on ordinary acquisition. Search-index text describes a policy updated 3 July 2024, including data-product access and general access/correction/complaint provisions, but the current original was not acquired. This is not treated as a current intelligence-feed licence or proof that an adverse inference is corrected throughout recipient systems. The current footer's Terms of use link is only `#`. Neither observation proves such rules do not exist. No retention schedule, named provider licence, match-quality assessment, recipient permission matrix or correction-propagation procedure was recovered.\n\n## Account closures exist in the public record — under a separately named operation\n\nICMEC's July 2026 No Bank Left Behind paper discusses closure outcomes under Operation Huntsman and cites AUSTRAC. Its Hume and Beyond Bank passages describe collaboration, not a specific Lighthouse alert followed by an account decision. Paper (see source references) pp1-3,5-9.\n\nThe paper labels the relevant AUSTRAC reference 2024. That URL now redirects to an official release dated 15 September 2025, which reports more than 3,000 Australian bank accounts linked to sextortion payments closed since June 2022 through the joint ACCCE–AUSTRAC Operation Huntsman. This is an agency-reported cumulative outcome, not an inspected bank ledger. The paper's older 1,800-plus callout and the current page must retain their different dates/versions. The cited historical version was not recovered. Current AUSTRAC release (see source references) date and Operation Huntsman paragraph.\n\nNo recovered record joins Lighthouse to those closures. That is a missing attribution, not proof Lighthouse was uninvolved. The candidate therefore creates a separate Huntsman operation and aggregate outcome, with no Lighthouse edge. The paper's closure passage derives from the AUSTRAC publication family; it is not a second independent confirmation.\n\n## Discriminating next record and alternative\n\nThe highest-value unacquired family is a de-identified, versioned Lighthouse query/alert-to-decision audit trail held by ICMEC and a recipient institution: input provenance and caveats, human review, corroborating evidence, action or no action, and correction. Pair it with supplier licence schedules, access terms, retention rules and correction/withdrawal propagation. No abuse data, account numbers or identifiable case material is needed to test the mechanism.\n\nA realistic alternative is an ordinary intelligence-support service: analysts use Lighthouse as context while existing transaction monitoring, other intelligence and institutional duties independently determine investigations, reporting or closures. The acquired records support that interpretation at least as readily as automatic blocking or donor-controlled enforcement. Kablamo's support contract is a separate attainable family for service dependency, access privileges, handover and decision rights.\n\n## Custody and reading limits\n\n`lighthouse-capture-manifest.json` records original HTML/PDF bytes, URLs, hashes and failures. The AUSTRAC ordinary-download route timed out; its successful official web-reader extraction is preserved as `lighthouse-austrac-web-extract.json`, explicitly not raw HTML. Privacy remains an unavailable original; no substantive candidate edge relies on it. The research-partnership page was captured and scoped for Lighthouse output; no such evaluated output was found there, and its other research was not promoted into this lane.\n\nThe bounded search included exact Lighthouse/ICMEC queries, public service/privacy material, the builder, the original programme, the current research page and AUSTRAC/AFP-targeted counterpart searches. These searches did not recover the missing institution-level Lighthouse outcome or licence record; they are not an exhaustive proof of absence. Acquisition stops at the specified holder frontier. `lighthouse-candidate-check.json` confirms candidate IDs, endpoint/source references and absence of baseline collisions; it does not certify the underlying claims.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-wave-2026-09-08-lighthouse-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings",
        "title": "SaferAI policy output: what was proposed, and where it was used",
        "description": "Selected output: AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future, the SaferAI for Children Coalition's discussion paper publicised by ICMEC Australia on 26 November 2024. Acquisition/read: 8 September 2026 local time. This lane did not edit the canonical case. The 2025 call to action was read as a bounded comparison, not expanded into a s",
        "html": "<p>Selected output: <strong>AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future</strong>, the SaferAI for Children Coalition&#x27;s discussion paper publicised by ICMEC Australia on 26 November 2024. Acquisition/read: 8 September 2026 local time. This lane did not edit the canonical case. The 2025 call to action was read as a bounded comparison, not expanded into a second campaign.</p>\n<p>The new result is an evidenced circulation route, with important gaps still visible. A coalition publication proposing greater use of AI for child protection entered both an independent review addressed to Tasmania&#x27;s Premier and eSafety&#x27;s later industry guidance. The records show what those recipients used. They do not establish who financed or cleared the original wording, or that either recipient adopted the paper&#x27;s device-level proposal.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-concrete-intervention\">The concrete intervention</h2>\n<p>The publisher&#x27;s dated launch notice describes a collaborative paper meant to inform policy and industry. Original PDF p8 goes beyond general awareness: among possible initiatives to support, it proposes AI detection/reporting inside encrypted environments and detection or blocking of abuse-material creation, storage and distribution at device level. That is a content-screening proposal. It is not a device-age/identity signal architecture, a contract to implement scanning, proof the technique works, or evidence that a government adopted it.</p>\n<p>The same paper p15 advocates development, funding and deployment of investigative AI: categorising material, ranking cases and detecting behavioural patterns. Pages16-19 propose legislative change, research support, cross-sector cooperation, public communication and specialised consultation with the coalition. It acknowledges AI benefits as well as harms. The paper&#x27;s legal/technical/statistical assertions were read as the advocates&#x27; claims, not independently reverified for this lane.</p>\n<p>Original: http[local research file] The publisher notice at http[local research file] fixes the displayed launch date. Both originals are retained locally.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-contributed-and-who-approved\">Who contributed, and who approved?</h2>\n<p>Page3 says the paper was collaboratively written using member insights. Page4 identifies ICMEC Australia as coalition leader and displays a historical member panel. Visual inspection confirms, among others, AiLECS Lab, University of Tasmania, UNICEF Australia, Australian Childhood Foundation, Bravehearts and the Grace Tame Foundation. These are publisher-presented member identities. They are not a task allocation, author list, sponsor ledger or publication-clearance record. I did not infer the undisplayed members, reconstruct a broad roster or import the January2026 participation rules into this 2024 document.</p>\n<p>One useful production lead is embedded in the acquired original: the PDF Author metadata names <strong>Mikaela Jago</strong>, with Canva as creator/producer. The 2025 call PDF contains the same metadata name. The retained ICMEC Australia 2024-25 impact report, printed p35/PDF18, separately lists Jago as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. The name is therefore attached both to an institutional role and these document-production records. That still does not establish who drafted a particular passage, whether the field reflects design/export rather than prose, or who approved publication. The candidate deliberately has no “Jago authored/approved paper” edge.</p>\n<p>No named paper-specific funding award, sponsor allocation, drafting payment, donor approval clause or sign-off appears in the inspected paper, notice or call. Existing Westpac programme funding cannot fill that gap. The decisive holder record is the paper&#x27;s version/comment history and publication clearance, paired with its project budget or commissioning agreement if one exists. ICMEC Australia&#x27;s programme/policy and finance teams are plausible custodians; Jago is a specific production-record lead.</p>\n<p>The original Nov2024 paper remains attributed to contemporary ICMEC Australia. This lane does not reinterpret its authorship using a later business-name change or retrospectively treat the international ICMEC organisation as publisher.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-public-counterpart-uses-the-paper\">A public counterpart uses the paper</h2>\n<p>The <strong>November2025 Woolcott Independent Review, Part A</strong>, has a cover identifying Peter Woolcott as independent reviewer and Jeremy Rockliff, Premier of Tasmania, as report addressee. In section6.3.2, printed p131/PDF132, it explicitly cites the coalition paper in notes124-125 and reproduces four proposed AI uses: research, automated analysis, collaboration and professional training. It also calls attention to the reThink chatbot example involving the University of Tasmania. This is substantive citation/use, not an inference from shared vocabulary.</p>\n<p>There is a small, concrete institutional path here: University of Tasmania appears in the coalition paper&#x27;s member panel; that paper discusses its involvement in a trial on p9; the Tasmanian reviewer explicitly highlights the example&#x27;s local university connection. This does not show that the university authored the paper, commissioned the review&#x27;s reference or received money because of it.</p>\n<p>The review proceeds to recommendations about cross-agency information sharing, privacy-law exceptions and a regulatory roadmap, printed pp132-134. Its own rationale also draws on Commission of Inquiry findings, statutory problems and consultations. We cannot assign those broader recommendations solely to this paper. Its four-item list does not reproduce the device/encrypted-environment screening bullet. The acquired publication is a report and recommendation record; a separate acceptance/implementation record was not acquired.</p>\n<p>Original official substitute: http[local research file] The cover and foreword say November2025; the filename&#x27;s October31 is not being used as a release/delivery date. The same title/content is readable in the Parliament-hosted tabled-paper copy, but this lane does not claim byte identity between copies without both originals.</p>\n<h2 id=\"esafetys-narrower-use\">eSafety&#x27;s narrower use</h2>\n<p>The <strong>Designing for Safety</strong> toolkit, displayed by the web reader as the 4 March2026 version, lists the coalition paper among relevant initiatives. More importantly, printed p28/PDF15 footnote34 cites it specifically for AI classifiers categorising material, prioritising cases and identifying patterns in grooming/perpetrator behaviour. The citation records access on 26 November2025. This supports a direct, bounded claim of use in official guidance.</p>\n<p>The toolkit says it followed an eSafety/US Department of Homeland Security workshop in December2024. The paper&#x27;s appearance in a 2026 toolkit does not show it was used at that earlier workshop. The toolkit also discusses age assurance, identity verification and encrypted-environment measures elsewhere. Those sections have their own context and references. Footnote34 is not a licence to attribute the whole toolkit to SaferAI, or to claim that its 2024 device-screening proposal became law.</p>\n<p>Official source: http[local research file] One direct download timed out; the web reader successfully inspected the original PDF&#x27;s scoped passages. A derivative reading extract is saved and labelled as such, with its own hash. There is no invented original-PDF hash or local original claim.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-comparison-and-the-limit\">The comparison and the limit</h2>\n<p>The three-page May2025 national call asks the Australian government to prioritise the issue, engage with the coalition, explore investment, strengthen education/legal responses and coordinate internationally. The original p3 “Signed by” panel differs from the 2024 member panel. This supplies a particular endorsement presentation, not proof of private approval permissions or withdrawal by an organisation absent from a later panel. No named ministerial receipt or acceptance appears in this call.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival explanation remains ordinary policy circulation: a relevant coalition report is publicly available, and official writers select useful portions while drawing on other material. Direct submission and negotiated drafting are also possible, but their records are missing. A source-selection/transmittal record from the Woolcott review or eSafety would distinguish those routes. General membership, general donor support or an editor&#x27;s PDF metadata cannot do that work.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-closed-routes\">Custody and closed routes</h2>\n<p>Five original publications/pages are preserved with SHA-256 values in policy-capture-manifest.json: the current index, historical launch notice, 23-page discussion paper, three-page call and 242-page official review. The last was read only at the precise scope recorded in policy-candidate.json; extracting pages is not a whole-report audit. The eSafety item is a separately labelled web-reader extract. The existing institutional impact-report source was reused by its stable case ID, with a new staff-panel locator.</p>\n<p>The initial Parliament PDF acquisition did not yield retained bytes; its exact non-success status was lost when the later eSafety timeout terminated that batch. Rather than manufacture an HTTP code or repeat the route, one alternate official Tasmanian publisher supplied the original. A failed web screenshot was replaced by rendering the already-held paper with installed pypdfium2. No packages, private endpoints, outreach or paid services were used. No further retries are required for this bounded result.</p>",
        "path": "australia-wave-2026-09-08/policy-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w4-pol-s-about",
          "w4-pol-s-launch",
          "w4-pol-s-paper",
          "w4-pol-s-call",
          "w4-pol-s-tas-review",
          "w4-pol-s-esafety-toolkit"
        ],
        "markdown": "Selected output: **AI and Child Protection: A Collaborative Approach to a Safer Future**, the SaferAI for Children Coalition's discussion paper publicised by ICMEC Australia on 26 November 2024. Acquisition/read: 8 September 2026 local time. This lane did not edit the canonical case. The 2025 call to action was read as a bounded comparison, not expanded into a second campaign.\n\nThe new result is an evidenced circulation route, with important gaps still visible. A coalition publication proposing greater use of AI for child protection entered both an independent review addressed to Tasmania's Premier and eSafety's later industry guidance. The records show what those recipients used. They do not establish who financed or cleared the original wording, or that either recipient adopted the paper's device-level proposal.\n\n## The concrete intervention\n\nThe publisher's dated launch notice describes a collaborative paper meant to inform policy and industry. Original PDF p8 goes beyond general awareness: among possible initiatives to support, it proposes AI detection/reporting inside encrypted environments and detection or blocking of abuse-material creation, storage and distribution at device level. That is a content-screening proposal. It is not a device-age/identity signal architecture, a contract to implement scanning, proof the technique works, or evidence that a government adopted it.\n\nThe same paper p15 advocates development, funding and deployment of investigative AI: categorising material, ranking cases and detecting behavioural patterns. Pages16-19 propose legislative change, research support, cross-sector cooperation, public communication and specialised consultation with the coalition. It acknowledges AI benefits as well as harms. The paper's legal/technical/statistical assertions were read as the advocates' claims, not independently reverified for this lane.\n\nOriginal: http[local research file] The publisher notice at http[local research file] fixes the displayed launch date. Both originals are retained locally.\n\n## Who contributed, and who approved?\n\nPage3 says the paper was collaboratively written using member insights. Page4 identifies ICMEC Australia as coalition leader and displays a historical member panel. Visual inspection confirms, among others, AiLECS Lab, University of Tasmania, UNICEF Australia, Australian Childhood Foundation, Bravehearts and the Grace Tame Foundation. These are publisher-presented member identities. They are not a task allocation, author list, sponsor ledger or publication-clearance record. I did not infer the undisplayed members, reconstruct a broad roster or import the January2026 participation rules into this 2024 document.\n\nOne useful production lead is embedded in the acquired original: the PDF Author metadata names **Mikaela Jago**, with Canva as creator/producer. The 2025 call PDF contains the same metadata name. The retained ICMEC Australia 2024-25 impact report, printed p35/PDF18, separately lists Jago as Senior Capacity and Prevention Coordinator. The name is therefore attached both to an institutional role and these document-production records. That still does not establish who drafted a particular passage, whether the field reflects design/export rather than prose, or who approved publication. The candidate deliberately has no “Jago authored/approved paper” edge.\n\nNo named paper-specific funding award, sponsor allocation, drafting payment, donor approval clause or sign-off appears in the inspected paper, notice or call. Existing Westpac programme funding cannot fill that gap. The decisive holder record is the paper's version/comment history and publication clearance, paired with its project budget or commissioning agreement if one exists. ICMEC Australia's programme/policy and finance teams are plausible custodians; Jago is a specific production-record lead.\n\nThe original Nov2024 paper remains attributed to contemporary ICMEC Australia. This lane does not reinterpret its authorship using a later business-name change or retrospectively treat the international ICMEC organisation as publisher.\n\n## A public counterpart uses the paper\n\nThe **November2025 Woolcott Independent Review, Part A**, has a cover identifying Peter Woolcott as independent reviewer and Jeremy Rockliff, Premier of Tasmania, as report addressee. In section6.3.2, printed p131/PDF132, it explicitly cites the coalition paper in notes124-125 and reproduces four proposed AI uses: research, automated analysis, collaboration and professional training. It also calls attention to the reThink chatbot example involving the University of Tasmania. This is substantive citation/use, not an inference from shared vocabulary.\n\nThere is a small, concrete institutional path here: University of Tasmania appears in the coalition paper's member panel; that paper discusses its involvement in a trial on p9; the Tasmanian reviewer explicitly highlights the example's local university connection. This does not show that the university authored the paper, commissioned the review's reference or received money because of it.\n\nThe review proceeds to recommendations about cross-agency information sharing, privacy-law exceptions and a regulatory roadmap, printed pp132-134. Its own rationale also draws on Commission of Inquiry findings, statutory problems and consultations. We cannot assign those broader recommendations solely to this paper. Its four-item list does not reproduce the device/encrypted-environment screening bullet. The acquired publication is a report and recommendation record; a separate acceptance/implementation record was not acquired.\n\nOriginal official substitute: http[local research file] The cover and foreword say November2025; the filename's October31 is not being used as a release/delivery date. The same title/content is readable in the Parliament-hosted tabled-paper copy, but this lane does not claim byte identity between copies without both originals.\n\n## eSafety's narrower use\n\nThe **Designing for Safety** toolkit, displayed by the web reader as the 4 March2026 version, lists the coalition paper among relevant initiatives. More importantly, printed p28/PDF15 footnote34 cites it specifically for AI classifiers categorising material, prioritising cases and identifying patterns in grooming/perpetrator behaviour. The citation records access on 26 November2025. This supports a direct, bounded claim of use in official guidance.\n\nThe toolkit says it followed an eSafety/US Department of Homeland Security workshop in December2024. The paper's appearance in a 2026 toolkit does not show it was used at that earlier workshop. The toolkit also discusses age assurance, identity verification and encrypted-environment measures elsewhere. Those sections have their own context and references. Footnote34 is not a licence to attribute the whole toolkit to SaferAI, or to claim that its 2024 device-screening proposal became law.\n\nOfficial source: http[local research file] One direct download timed out; the web reader successfully inspected the original PDF's scoped passages. A derivative reading extract is saved and labelled as such, with its own hash. There is no invented original-PDF hash or local original claim.\n\n## The comparison and the limit\n\nThe three-page May2025 national call asks the Australian government to prioritise the issue, engage with the coalition, explore investment, strengthen education/legal responses and coordinate internationally. The original p3 “Signed by” panel differs from the 2024 member panel. This supplies a particular endorsement presentation, not proof of private approval permissions or withdrawal by an organisation absent from a later panel. No named ministerial receipt or acceptance appears in this call.\n\nThe strongest rival explanation remains ordinary policy circulation: a relevant coalition report is publicly available, and official writers select useful portions while drawing on other material. Direct submission and negotiated drafting are also possible, but their records are missing. A source-selection/transmittal record from the Woolcott review or eSafety would distinguish those routes. General membership, general donor support or an editor's PDF metadata cannot do that work.\n\n## Custody and closed routes\n\nFive original publications/pages are preserved with SHA-256 values in policy-capture-manifest.json: the current index, historical launch notice, 23-page discussion paper, three-page call and 242-page official review. The last was read only at the precise scope recorded in policy-candidate.json; extracting pages is not a whole-report audit. The eSafety item is a separately labelled web-reader extract. The existing institutional impact-report source was reused by its stable case ID, with a new staff-panel locator.\n\nThe initial Parliament PDF acquisition did not yield retained bytes; its exact non-success status was lost when the later eSafety timeout terminated that batch. Rather than manufacture an HTTP code or repeat the route, one alternate official Tasmanian publisher supplied the original. A failed web screenshot was replaced by rendering the already-held paper with installed pypdfium2. No packages, private endpoints, outreach or paid services were used. No further retries are required for this bounded result.\n",
        "file": "research/australia-wave-2026-09-08-policy-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution",
        "title": "July 2026 multistate AG / Block resolution",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. The July resolution disclosed by Block is identifiable as the 8 July 2026, USD 45 million settlement announced by 46 state attorneys general, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Two state-issued copies establish the substantive agreed terms. Oregon's copy includes the parties' signatures; neither inspected copy establishes judicial entry. ",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. The July resolution disclosed by Block is identifiable as the <strong>8 July 2026, USD 45 million settlement announced by 46 state attorneys general</strong>, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Two state-issued copies establish the substantive agreed terms. Oregon&#x27;s copy includes the parties&#x27; signatures; neither inspected copy establishes judicial entry. The central coordination provision credits redress paid under the January 2025 CFPB order and supplies a state-controlled fallback. It is not an additional USD 75–120 million consumer award to stack on top of the CFPB amount.</p>\n<h2 id=\"identification-parties-and-document-status\">Identification, parties and document status</h2>\n<p>[Block&#x27;s Q2 2026 filing](http[local research file] Note 16, printed page 33, says it entered a July 2026 resolution with multiple state AGs concerning complaints and disputes, and calls the amount immaterial. This is an issuer disclosure, not the operative amount or proof of payment. The identification is corroborated by the [California AG announcement](http[local research file] and [Oregon AG announcement](http[local research file] both dated 8 July 2026. Oregon says it co-led the investigation with Texas.</p>\n<p>The [California instrument](http[local research file] is a <strong>[PROPOSED] Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction</strong>, People of California v. Block, Inc. f/k/a Square, Inc., Superior Court, Alameda County. Its case-number field is blank on PDF page 1 and judicial signature/date fields are blank on page 21, visually checked. Its opening and ¶8, pages 2–3, say the parties agreed without factual/liability admission, Block denies wrongdoing, and parties waive appeal. This is an official published settlement text, not a visually verified entered judgment.</p>\n<p>The [Oregon instrument](http[local research file] is a Stipulated General Judgment and Money Award, State of Oregon ex rel. Dan Rayfield v. Block, Circuit Court, Multnomah County. <strong>PDF page 29 bears Block Chief Legal Officer Chrysty Esperanza&#x27;s DocuSign signature dated 6 July 2026; page 30 bears Oregon AAG Joseph Ferretti&#x27;s signature dated 8 July 2026.</strong> Page 28&#x27;s court-approval line is blank; page 31 is a certificate dated 8 July calling the proposed judgment ready for judicial signature. Its case-number field is also blank. Thus signed party assent is observed; court entry, an assigned docket number and final entered-version identity remain unverified. A blank posted copy is not evidence that the court never entered a judgment.</p>\n<p>Both instruments&#x27; first-page footnote lists the 46 participating states and explains that separate state judgments incorporate substantive terms, with local-rule/law differences. Neither is a single document bearing all 46 AG signatures. Defendant wording includes Block&#x27;s subsidiaries, affiliates, successors and assigns; no claim is made that each separately signed. California ¶19 / Oregon ¶11(k) define <strong>8 July 2026</strong> as the effective date. Relevant laws include the state&#x27;s consumer-protection statutes, EFTA and Regulation E. California ¶18 / Oregon ¶11(j) define the resolved pre-effective-date conduct and exclude Afterpay US&#x27;s BNPL products. Complaint allegations are not admissions or contested judicial findings.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-changed-and-who-decides\">What changed, and who decides</h2>\n<p>Locators below refer to the published California text unless Oregon is specified; PDF and printed page numbers agree. Statements describe the agreed terms, subject to the court-entry limitation above.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Mechanism</th>\n<th>Agreed requirement / decision right</th>\n<th>Relationship to the earlier CFPB order</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Staffed service and escalation</td>\n<td>¶¶44–46, pages 8–9: complaint/error/account-access/fraud intake and resolution or escalation; live customer support 24 hours/day, toll-free human phone at least <strong>13.5 hours/day</strong>, including <strong>5–6:30 p.m. Pacific</strong>, human chat at least 18 hours/day, reasonable hold/callback timelines, clearly displayed contact/hours and a direct AG complaint contact. Oregon ¶¶31–33, pages 9–10.</td>\n<td>Human phone minimum is 13.5 hours rather than CFPB ¶108(a)&#x27;s 12. Do not describe this as 24-hour human telephone service. The AG contact is a specific external escalation route; it does not make the AG the initial reviewer of every case.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Error investigation and evidence</td>\n<td>¶¶47–50, pages 9–10: prompt, thorough, reasonable investigation without extra prerequisites; results within three business days of completion; explanation and access to relied-on documents for no-error/different-error findings; correction within one business day; provisional credit after ten business days if incomplete; finalization under Regulation E; two-year records. No mandatory contact with the P2P transfer recipient or law enforcement, or extra information before starting, and no linked-instrument exclusion. Oregon ¶¶34–37, pages 11–12.</td>\n<td>Largely parallels the CFPB transaction-error requirements and explicitly adds provisional-credit finalization wording. This document-access requirement concerns a Notice of Error, not every closure appeal.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Locks, suspensions and deactivations</td>\n<td>¶51, pages 10–11, says <strong>“By June 30, 2026”</strong>: reasonably designed procedures for prompt notice, funds-access information and how restrictions may be addressed; prompt review/response and reasonable restoration timelines/efforts, with appropriateness and legal-prohibition qualifications. Oregon ¶38, pages 12–13, repeats this.</td>\n<td>This wording does <strong>not</strong> reproduce CFPB ¶108(c)–(d)&#x27;s fixed 24-hour notice and ten-business-day appeal decision requirements. The later settlement does not say it replaces or relaxes that order. June 30 precedes the stipulated July 8 effective date; retain the literal date and seek the final entered text/implementation record before interpreting why. It is not evidence of breach or deliberate backdating.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Marketing and fraud policy</td>\n<td>¶¶36–43, pages 7–8: no misleading safety/bank/FDIC statements; discontinue marketing known to increase fraud, direct fraud education, public educational link and takeover-prevention procedures. ¶52, pages 11–12: identify suspected scam accounts, stop their operation and associated persons returning, complaint/trend tracking, good-faith refund policies and warnings. Oregon ¶¶23–30,39.</td>\n<td>Anti-fraud restrictions and customer recourse are both required. No Lantern/Tech Coalition supplier or mandatory signal-sharing arrangement is specified.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Corporate oversight</td>\n<td>¶¶30–35, pages 6–7: documented compliance management, qualified committee, <strong>quarterly Board reporting</strong>, employee/contractor training and retained training records. ¶¶53–54, page 12: annual committee-approved compliance report, available to state on request. Oregon ¶¶17–22,40–41.</td>\n<td>Do not import the CFPB order&#x27;s annual sworn Board-approved submission into this different report: this text requires preparation, committee approval and availability on request.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Supervision and changes</td>\n<td>¶¶66,75–76, pages 15–17: modification can be sought through the executive committee and court; court retains enforcement/modification jurisdiction. Written non-material changes, including time extensions, can be agreed through counsel without a court order. Where the State determines a material failure and, in its sole discretion, no health/safety/welfare threat, it will give written notice before legal action. Block then has15businessdays to provide a good-faith written response; that response may describe completed correction or ongoing corrective work with a reasonable timetable. Oregon ¶¶54,63–64, pages 17,19–20.</td>\n<td>The notice/response requirement applies in the specified circumstances, not to all enforcement;15businessdays is not necessarily a completed-cure deadline. There is no independently observed monitor appointment or prior regulator approval of every operating policy.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>General Section III compliance is due no later than 30 days after the effective date unless otherwise specified (California ¶26; Oregon ¶13). Existing procedures may satisfy the requirements if adequate (¶27 / ¶14), so prospective wording is not an admission that every required practice was absent. Training under California ¶33 / Oregon ¶20 is due within 90 days, then within 60 days of assuming the relevant responsibilities; transaction-error training is annual and before assuming that work (¶34 / ¶21).</p>\n<p>Only enumerated obligations expire after five years, including specified committee/reporting, support-hours/contact, account-review and fraud measures (California ¶64; Oregon ¶52). Direct consumer education has a seven-year term (¶65 / ¶53). The texts do not say the whole judgment ends after five years. Written modifications or court entry could affect implementation; none was acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"where-money-goes-and-what-must-not-be-double-counted\">Where money goes, and what must not be double-counted</h2>\n<p>California ¶¶59–60, page 13, and Oregon ¶¶46–48, pages 15–16, provide <strong>USD 45,000,000 payable within 30 days</strong> to the AGs, allocated at the participating states&#x27; discretion. California&#x27;s specified share is <strong>USD 2,941,785.27</strong>, allocated under California Business and Professions Code §17206(c); the state&#x27;s portion and interest are for AG consumer-protection enforcement. Oregon&#x27;s specified share is <strong>USD 3,067,141.53</strong>, deposited into its ORS 180.095 account for any lawful purpose. Oregon&#x27;s money-award table, pages 26–27, separately lists USD 281 filing costs. These are published obligations, not receipts.</p>\n<p><strong>Oregon ¶48 expressly allocates USD 264,153.73 out of the same USD 45 million to the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG), as reimbursement for certain costs and expenses of the participating states&#x27; investigation.</strong> It directs wire payment using Oregon AG instructions. This is a specific institutional reimbursement entitlement in the signed settlement text. It is neither a separate additional fine nor evidence that NAAG controlled the legal findings, and no bank/recipient payment record was read.</p>\n<p>California ¶¶55–58, pages 12–13, and Oregon ¶¶42–45, pages 14–15, establish consumer redress of USD 75–120 million with three decisive conditions. <strong>First</strong>, redress payments under CFPB docket 2025-CFPB-0001 satisfy this obligation, with no further redress required under this judgment. <strong>Second</strong>, if Block has not paid at least USD 75 million in connection with that order by <strong>16 January 2030</strong>, it must instead use a materially similar redress plan proposed to the <strong>Multistate AG Executive Committee by 18 March 2030</strong>, approved by that committee before payment. If payments are underway but unfinished on 16 January 2030, an update is required. <strong>Third</strong>, within ten days after sending CFPB the ¶122 Redress Report, Block must notify the committee that payments have been completed. Do not recast March 18 as a payment-completion deadline; it is the fallback plan-submission deadline.</p>\n<p>The executive committee is precisely the AGs of <strong>Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Vermont and Washington</strong> (California ¶22; Oregon ¶11(n)). This is an explicit redress-plan approval route, not a general veto over every Cash App decision. The published text does not specify its internal voting rule.</p>\n<p>The earlier CFPB packet explains its USD 75 million reserve/floor and possible residue-to-CFPB/Treasury mechanism. This July text uses redress paid “in connection with” that order and requires a materially similar fallback plan. It does not support a fresh claim that all of the floor must already have reached consumers, or that a separate second USD 75–120 million is owed in addition. The signed terms, AG announcements and issuer statement establish an agreed resolution; none of these records proves actual July-settlement payment totals.</p>\n<p>Release follows full payment of the state-payment amount (California ¶¶61–63, pages 13–14; Oregon ¶¶49–51, pages 16–17). It broadly covers the state&#x27;s civil claims for defined pre-effective conduct, preserves enforcement of the judgment and does not create, waive or limit private rights of action. Criminal liability and specified other liabilities remain outside the release. Parties&#x27; waiver of appeal is not a waiver by every customer.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-resolved-source-authentication-gap\">A resolved source-authentication gap</h2>\n<p>The California announcement&#x27;s final settlement-information paragraph visibly labels and links <code>http[local research file]</code> through a publisher-supplied Proofpoint wrapper. More directly, the Oregon announcement&#x27;s final paragraph links that exact domain with an ordinary href, alongside the CFPB official case page. Both links are retained in the official HTML. This establishes an <strong>official AG referral to the remediation site</strong>, correcting the earlier narrow search failure to find one. It still does not establish the administrator&#x27;s appointment instrument, validate each check, or prove a payout total. This run did not revisit or transact with that site.</p>\n<h2 id=\"interpretation-and-next-discriminator\">Interpretation and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>Strongest supported account: state AGs agreed an additional public enforcement and payment arrangement that expressly preserves/credits the existing federal redress commitment and assigns fallback-plan approval to a named eight-state committee. NAAG has a disclosed, bounded investigation-expense reimbursement within the state-payment pool. Customer remedies and anti-fraud restrictions coexist, with legally meaningful differences between the state and CFPB formulations.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to treating this as a new centralized restriction mechanism is the text itself: repeated existing consumer-law duties, permission to satisfy terms through adequate existing procedures, a specific federal-redress credit, and no named external signal supplier. The record supports coordination of enforcement and remedy; it does not connect this settlement to Lantern decisions or the Cash App closure count in that separate case.</p>\n<p>The next decisive records are the <strong>entered California/Oregon judgment and docket entry</strong> (court custodians), any written timing amendment explaining or carrying forward the June 30 requirement, actual state/NAAG receipts, and the implemented restriction-review procedure plus committee-approved annual report (Block/state AG custodians). The Oregon signatures establish assent but stop short of observed judicial entry. No new court account, outreach or broader state hunt was undertaken. Acquisition stops at this signed-instrument breakpoint for the forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-reading-scope\">Source custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p><code>captures-ag.json</code> records five retained originals, all ordinary unauthenticated GETs with HTTP 200, hashes and dates: California notice, proposed judgment and complaint; Oregon notice and signed stipulated-judgment packet. The California judgment was read in full, PDF 1–21, with pages 1/21 visually checked. Oregon pages 1–21 and 26–31 were read, with signature/approval pages 28–30 visually checked; pages 22–25 were captured but not substantively read (notice-address continuation). California complaint scope is PDF 1 and 11–13 only: caption, account-access allegations ¶59–63, causes of action/prayer and 8 July 2026 date. The complaint is not an operative order. Both announcements&#x27; complete substantive bodies and relevant links were read; unrelated site-navigation content was not treated as substantive reading.</p>\n<p>Oregon original SHA-256: <code>4aa51e7210a316a00ddaf3945765c07d9df02e9ae23b4457eda590086b4b5b9f</code>. California proposed judgment SHA-256: <code>496f00ab441b042a11bd1742ea07a597d28b8c93052a8d59b5acf84213e45ed1</code>. Extracts and PNGs are reading aids. Q2 filing scope was the July-resolution paragraph, printed 33/web-reader line 1259; no original SEC GET retry, and no full-filing reading claim. No case, atlas or ZIP was edited.</p>",
        "path": "cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09/july-ag-resolution.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-july-notice",
          "w24-ag-s-july-ca",
          "w24-ag-s-july-or"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. The July resolution disclosed by Block is identifiable as the **8 July 2026, USD 45 million settlement announced by 46 state attorneys general**, co-led by Oregon and Texas. Two state-issued copies establish the substantive agreed terms. Oregon's copy includes the parties' signatures; neither inspected copy establishes judicial entry. The central coordination provision credits redress paid under the January 2025 CFPB order and supplies a state-controlled fallback. It is not an additional USD 75–120 million consumer award to stack on top of the CFPB amount.\n\n## Identification, parties and document status\n\nBlock's Q2 2026 filing (see source references) Note 16, printed page 33, says it entered a July 2026 resolution with multiple state AGs concerning complaints and disputes, and calls the amount immaterial. This is an issuer disclosure, not the operative amount or proof of payment. The identification is corroborated by the California AG announcement (see source references) and Oregon AG announcement (see source references) both dated 8 July 2026. Oregon says it co-led the investigation with Texas.\n\nThe California instrument (see source references) is a **[PROPOSED] Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction**, People of California v. Block, Inc. f/k/a Square, Inc., Superior Court, Alameda County. Its case-number field is blank on PDF page 1 and judicial signature/date fields are blank on page 21, visually checked. Its opening and ¶8, pages 2–3, say the parties agreed without factual/liability admission, Block denies wrongdoing, and parties waive appeal. This is an official published settlement text, not a visually verified entered judgment.\n\nThe Oregon instrument (see source references) is a Stipulated General Judgment and Money Award, State of Oregon ex rel. Dan Rayfield v. Block, Circuit Court, Multnomah County. **PDF page 29 bears Block Chief Legal Officer Chrysty Esperanza's DocuSign signature dated 6 July 2026; page 30 bears Oregon AAG Joseph Ferretti's signature dated 8 July 2026.** Page 28's court-approval line is blank; page 31 is a certificate dated 8 July calling the proposed judgment ready for judicial signature. Its case-number field is also blank. Thus signed party assent is observed; court entry, an assigned docket number and final entered-version identity remain unverified. A blank posted copy is not evidence that the court never entered a judgment.\n\nBoth instruments' first-page footnote lists the 46 participating states and explains that separate state judgments incorporate substantive terms, with local-rule/law differences. Neither is a single document bearing all 46 AG signatures. Defendant wording includes Block's subsidiaries, affiliates, successors and assigns; no claim is made that each separately signed. California ¶19 / Oregon ¶11(k) define **8 July 2026** as the effective date. Relevant laws include the state's consumer-protection statutes, EFTA and Regulation E. California ¶18 / Oregon ¶11(j) define the resolved pre-effective-date conduct and exclude Afterpay US's BNPL products. Complaint allegations are not admissions or contested judicial findings.\n\n## What changed, and who decides\n\nLocators below refer to the published California text unless Oregon is specified; PDF and printed page numbers agree. Statements describe the agreed terms, subject to the court-entry limitation above.\n\n| Mechanism | Agreed requirement / decision right | Relationship to the earlier CFPB order |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Staffed service and escalation | ¶¶44–46, pages 8–9: complaint/error/account-access/fraud intake and resolution or escalation; live customer support 24 hours/day, toll-free human phone at least **13.5 hours/day**, including **5–6:30 p.m. Pacific**, human chat at least 18 hours/day, reasonable hold/callback timelines, clearly displayed contact/hours and a direct AG complaint contact. Oregon ¶¶31–33, pages 9–10. | Human phone minimum is 13.5 hours rather than CFPB ¶108(a)'s 12. Do not describe this as 24-hour human telephone service. The AG contact is a specific external escalation route; it does not make the AG the initial reviewer of every case. |\n| Error investigation and evidence | ¶¶47–50, pages 9–10: prompt, thorough, reasonable investigation without extra prerequisites; results within three business days of completion; explanation and access to relied-on documents for no-error/different-error findings; correction within one business day; provisional credit after ten business days if incomplete; finalization under Regulation E; two-year records. No mandatory contact with the P2P transfer recipient or law enforcement, or extra information before starting, and no linked-instrument exclusion. Oregon ¶¶34–37, pages 11–12. | Largely parallels the CFPB transaction-error requirements and explicitly adds provisional-credit finalization wording. This document-access requirement concerns a Notice of Error, not every closure appeal. |\n| Locks, suspensions and deactivations | ¶51, pages 10–11, says **“By June 30, 2026”**: reasonably designed procedures for prompt notice, funds-access information and how restrictions may be addressed; prompt review/response and reasonable restoration timelines/efforts, with appropriateness and legal-prohibition qualifications. Oregon ¶38, pages 12–13, repeats this. | This wording does **not** reproduce CFPB ¶108(c)–(d)'s fixed 24-hour notice and ten-business-day appeal decision requirements. The later settlement does not say it replaces or relaxes that order. June 30 precedes the stipulated July 8 effective date; retain the literal date and seek the final entered text/implementation record before interpreting why. It is not evidence of breach or deliberate backdating. |\n| Marketing and fraud policy | ¶¶36–43, pages 7–8: no misleading safety/bank/FDIC statements; discontinue marketing known to increase fraud, direct fraud education, public educational link and takeover-prevention procedures. ¶52, pages 11–12: identify suspected scam accounts, stop their operation and associated persons returning, complaint/trend tracking, good-faith refund policies and warnings. Oregon ¶¶23–30,39. | Anti-fraud restrictions and customer recourse are both required. No Lantern/Tech Coalition supplier or mandatory signal-sharing arrangement is specified. |\n| Corporate oversight | ¶¶30–35, pages 6–7: documented compliance management, qualified committee, **quarterly Board reporting**, employee/contractor training and retained training records. ¶¶53–54, page 12: annual committee-approved compliance report, available to state on request. Oregon ¶¶17–22,40–41. | Do not import the CFPB order's annual sworn Board-approved submission into this different report: this text requires preparation, committee approval and availability on request. |\n| Supervision and changes | ¶¶66,75–76, pages 15–17: modification can be sought through the executive committee and court; court retains enforcement/modification jurisdiction. Written non-material changes, including time extensions, can be agreed through counsel without a court order. Where the State determines a material failure and, in its sole discretion, no health/safety/welfare threat, it will give written notice before legal action. Block then has15businessdays to provide a good-faith written response; that response may describe completed correction or ongoing corrective work with a reasonable timetable. Oregon ¶¶54,63–64, pages 17,19–20. | The notice/response requirement applies in the specified circumstances, not to all enforcement;15businessdays is not necessarily a completed-cure deadline. There is no independently observed monitor appointment or prior regulator approval of every operating policy. |\n\nGeneral Section III compliance is due no later than 30 days after the effective date unless otherwise specified (California ¶26; Oregon ¶13). Existing procedures may satisfy the requirements if adequate (¶27 / ¶14), so prospective wording is not an admission that every required practice was absent. Training under California ¶33 / Oregon ¶20 is due within 90 days, then within 60 days of assuming the relevant responsibilities; transaction-error training is annual and before assuming that work (¶34 / ¶21).\n\nOnly enumerated obligations expire after five years, including specified committee/reporting, support-hours/contact, account-review and fraud measures (California ¶64; Oregon ¶52). Direct consumer education has a seven-year term (¶65 / ¶53). The texts do not say the whole judgment ends after five years. Written modifications or court entry could affect implementation; none was acquired.\n\n## Where money goes, and what must not be double-counted\n\nCalifornia ¶¶59–60, page 13, and Oregon ¶¶46–48, pages 15–16, provide **USD 45,000,000 payable within 30 days** to the AGs, allocated at the participating states' discretion. California's specified share is **USD 2,941,785.27**, allocated under California Business and Professions Code §17206(c); the state's portion and interest are for AG consumer-protection enforcement. Oregon's specified share is **USD 3,067,141.53**, deposited into its ORS 180.095 account for any lawful purpose. Oregon's money-award table, pages 26–27, separately lists USD 281 filing costs. These are published obligations, not receipts.\n\n**Oregon ¶48 expressly allocates USD 264,153.73 out of the same USD 45 million to the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG), as reimbursement for certain costs and expenses of the participating states' investigation.** It directs wire payment using Oregon AG instructions. This is a specific institutional reimbursement entitlement in the signed settlement text. It is neither a separate additional fine nor evidence that NAAG controlled the legal findings, and no bank/recipient payment record was read.\n\nCalifornia ¶¶55–58, pages 12–13, and Oregon ¶¶42–45, pages 14–15, establish consumer redress of USD 75–120 million with three decisive conditions. **First**, redress payments under CFPB docket 2025-CFPB-0001 satisfy this obligation, with no further redress required under this judgment. **Second**, if Block has not paid at least USD 75 million in connection with that order by **16 January 2030**, it must instead use a materially similar redress plan proposed to the **Multistate AG Executive Committee by 18 March 2030**, approved by that committee before payment. If payments are underway but unfinished on 16 January 2030, an update is required. **Third**, within ten days after sending CFPB the ¶122 Redress Report, Block must notify the committee that payments have been completed. Do not recast March 18 as a payment-completion deadline; it is the fallback plan-submission deadline.\n\nThe executive committee is precisely the AGs of **Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Vermont and Washington** (California ¶22; Oregon ¶11(n)). This is an explicit redress-plan approval route, not a general veto over every Cash App decision. The published text does not specify its internal voting rule.\n\nThe earlier CFPB packet explains its USD 75 million reserve/floor and possible residue-to-CFPB/Treasury mechanism. This July text uses redress paid “in connection with” that order and requires a materially similar fallback plan. It does not support a fresh claim that all of the floor must already have reached consumers, or that a separate second USD 75–120 million is owed in addition. The signed terms, AG announcements and issuer statement establish an agreed resolution; none of these records proves actual July-settlement payment totals.\n\nRelease follows full payment of the state-payment amount (California ¶¶61–63, pages 13–14; Oregon ¶¶49–51, pages 16–17). It broadly covers the state's civil claims for defined pre-effective conduct, preserves enforcement of the judgment and does not create, waive or limit private rights of action. Criminal liability and specified other liabilities remain outside the release. Parties' waiver of appeal is not a waiver by every customer.\n\n## A resolved source-authentication gap\n\nThe California announcement's final settlement-information paragraph visibly labels and links `http[local research file]` through a publisher-supplied Proofpoint wrapper. More directly, the Oregon announcement's final paragraph links that exact domain with an ordinary href, alongside the CFPB official case page. Both links are retained in the official HTML. This establishes an **official AG referral to the remediation site**, correcting the earlier narrow search failure to find one. It still does not establish the administrator's appointment instrument, validate each check, or prove a payout total. This run did not revisit or transact with that site.\n\n## Interpretation and next discriminator\n\nStrongest supported account: state AGs agreed an additional public enforcement and payment arrangement that expressly preserves/credits the existing federal redress commitment and assigns fallback-plan approval to a named eight-state committee. NAAG has a disclosed, bounded investigation-expense reimbursement within the state-payment pool. Customer remedies and anti-fraud restrictions coexist, with legally meaningful differences between the state and CFPB formulations.\n\nThe strongest rival to treating this as a new centralized restriction mechanism is the text itself: repeated existing consumer-law duties, permission to satisfy terms through adequate existing procedures, a specific federal-redress credit, and no named external signal supplier. The record supports coordination of enforcement and remedy; it does not connect this settlement to Lantern decisions or the Cash App closure count in that separate case.\n\nThe next decisive records are the **entered California/Oregon judgment and docket entry** (court custodians), any written timing amendment explaining or carrying forward the June 30 requirement, actual state/NAAG receipts, and the implemented restriction-review procedure plus committee-approved annual report (Block/state AG custodians). The Oregon signatures establish assent but stop short of observed judicial entry. No new court account, outreach or broader state hunt was undertaken. Acquisition stops at this signed-instrument breakpoint for the forest review.\n\n## Source custody and reading scope\n\n`captures-ag.json` records five retained originals, all ordinary unauthenticated GETs with HTTP 200, hashes and dates: California notice, proposed judgment and complaint; Oregon notice and signed stipulated-judgment packet. The California judgment was read in full, PDF 1–21, with pages 1/21 visually checked. Oregon pages 1–21 and 26–31 were read, with signature/approval pages 28–30 visually checked; pages 22–25 were captured but not substantively read (notice-address continuation). California complaint scope is PDF 1 and 11–13 only: caption, account-access allegations ¶59–63, causes of action/prayer and 8 July 2026 date. The complaint is not an operative order. Both announcements' complete substantive bodies and relevant links were read; unrelated site-navigation content was not treated as substantive reading.\n\nOregon original SHA-256: `4aa51e7210a316a00ddaf3945765c07d9df02e9ae23b4457eda590086b4b5b9f`. California proposed judgment SHA-256: `496f00ab441b042a11bd1742ea07a597d28b8c93052a8d59b5acf84213e45ed1`. Extracts and PNGs are reading aids. Q2 filing scope was the July-resolution paragraph, printed 33/web-reader line 1259; no original SEC GET retry, and no full-filing reading claim. No case, atlas or ZIP was edited.\n",
        "file": "research/cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement",
        "title": "Cash App US: published contractual authority over access and balances",
        "description": "Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App's obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See the regulator packet(.",
        "html": "<p>Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App&#x27;s obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See <a href=\"/research/cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb\">the regulator packet</a>. This narrows the earlier procedural gap; actual compliance, applicable modifications and a Lantern-specific correction/remedy trace remain unestablished. The original source-specific analysis below is preserved.</p>\n<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded agreement lane; no customer account, support contact, private API, historical contract reconstruction or enforceability opinion. The main instrument is the agreement with <strong>Block, Inc.</strong> It grants service-access and fund-access discretion separately. Neither contractual power proves why any particular account was closed, nor does closure itself establish loss of ownership of the remaining money.</p>\n<h2 id=\"instruments-and-custody\">Instruments and custody</h2>\n<p>The current official [Cash App Terms of Service](http[local research file] displays <strong>Effective 7 February 2024; Last Updated 26 August 2026</strong>. The original HTML and derived text are retained as <code>agreement-cashapp-tos.html</code> / <code>.txt</code>. The opening identifies Block, Inc. as the contracting company and says gray annotations have no legal effect (derived lines 1–10). Section II distinguishes revised terms from terms applicable to a dispute arising before a change (lines 213–219). This is a present public instrument, not proof of the terms accepted by the accounts in the 2025 Lantern example. Earlier search-index text displayed June 2026 dates; the captured original and fresh canonical page control this reading.</p>\n<p>The incorporated [Acceptable Use Policy](http[local research file] was captured separately as <code>agreement-cashapp-aup.html</code> / <code>.txt</code>. Its displayed text has no effective/updated date; 9 September is the observation date, not an inferred adoption date. The complete policy was read, emphasizing the clauses below. These instruments are two related company sources, not independent corroboration. Exact URLs, response status, acquisition timestamps, sizes, SHA-256 hashes and scoped reading extent are in <code>captures-agreement.json</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"decision-rights-and-limits\">Decision rights and limits</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Mechanism</th>\n<th>Operative provision and retained locator</th>\n<th>Evidence boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>End service access</td>\n<td>Terms XXIII.9, text 1276–1278: Block can suspend/terminate the account, associated accounts or service access for any reason; reasonable notification steps by email or next attempted app access.</td>\n<td>Reasonable notice steps are not an advance-notice period, detailed-reasons promise or prior hearing.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AUP enforcement</td>\n<td>AUP II, text 70–74: reported violations can produce suspension/termination without notice; suspected violations may be investigated.</td>\n<td>Read alongside the general notice wording, without declaring which clause legally prevails in a specific dispute.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Delay ordinary cash-out</td>\n<td>Terms VI.1(e)(iii), text 414: discretion to delay/limit transfers for financial exposure or investigation; also deferral/redirection/restriction for law, subpoena, court order or governmental request.</td>\n<td>Do not say every restriction requires a court order; the clause includes other stated bases.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Balance after closure</td>\n<td>Terms XXIII.11, text 1282–1284: pending transactions settle; withdrawal of custodial funds less applicable fees is conditional/discretionary; a new linked bank may be required; risk and investigation holds are permitted.</td>\n<td>No universal release deadline here. The broader gray annotation about returning funds is expressly non-operative. A hold is not proof of confiscation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Transaction refusal</td>\n<td>Terms XXIII.4, text 1247–1252: funding sources and transactions can be restricted; notice has prohibited-transaction exceptions.</td>\n<td>Available authority, not a demonstrated instruction from a particular network/bank.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Compelled fund action</td>\n<td>Terms XXIII.3, text 1245–1246: freeze, withholding or remittance in response to specified binding instruments.</td>\n<td>Distinct from the discretionary risk clauses and ordinary closure. No such order was acquired for the Lantern example.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Recover liabilities</td>\n<td>Terms XXIII.1, text 1232–1242: recovery/setoff against account or linked funds for stated liabilities, disputes and other agreement grounds.</td>\n<td>Do not convert contractual recovery language into a right to take every closed account&#x27;s balance.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Custodial access</td>\n<td>Terms VI.3, text 443–445; XXIII.8, text 1274–1275: separate corporate/customer funds, possible pooling, Block agency, access through Cash App rather than direct withdrawal from custodial banks/brokerages.</td>\n<td>A documented intermediary access condition; neither partner-bank direction nor sole legal ownership by Block follows.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The AUP has separate restrictions for criminal activity (including child sexual-abuse material), adult-content sales, and businesses believed to create elevated financial risk or breach bank/card-network policies (AUP I, text 35–36, 54–55, 62–63). This is a contractual route by which external policy can matter. It identifies no particular bank, policy version, instruction or causal role in the Lantern closures. Its sanctions subsection separately contemplates indefinite holding in apparent violations; that is not the universal rule for closed accounts (text 50–51).</p>\n<h2 id=\"bank-roles-and-reconsideration\">Bank roles and reconsideration</h2>\n<p>The terms distinguish the Cash App service contract from a cardholder&#x27;s agreement with the issuing bank; that bank agreement governs card use/bank relationship in an inconsistency (VIII.1–2, text 620–626). No individual customer&#x27;s product/card agreement was obtained, and no bank-specific closure authority is asserted here. Custodial placement, card issuance and an instruction to close are different relations.</p>\n<p>XXIII.19–20 contains a broad dispute definition and a separate pre-filing informal dispute process, including written notice, a personal conference and a 60-day negotiation window (text 1314–1323). This is not a routine support appeal or a promise to restore access. Only the opening and pre-filing paragraphs were substantively read; this packet does not evaluate enforceability, opt-outs or every arbitration condition. Parent&#x27;s separately retained help article addresses operational closure review. Its ordinary withdrawal instructions should not be treated as overriding the agreement&#x27;s hold conditions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes-and-what-remains-missing\">What this changes, and what remains missing</h2>\n<p>The public instruments establish a service-mediated path to money and a broad internal decision space. Competing explanations remain live: fraud/risk protection, compliance with an external obligation, enforcement of Cash App&#x27;s own acceptable-use choices, or a mistaken decision. The contract alone cannot choose among them. Reinstatement review and balance release also remain different outcomes.</p>\n<p>The most discriminating missing records are the actual closure reason/notice, applicable customer/product terms at the event date, any hold rationale and release ledger, and the internal or external instruction that caused the decision. The relevant holders would be Block&#x27;s account/support/compliance records and, only if a bank or authority actually participated, that actor&#x27;s corresponding instrument. No inference of current access to such records is made. No public account-level record was acquired for the 18-account Lantern example; no historical backfill, bank-name hunt or additional acquisition is proposed by this packet.</p>\n<p>Acquisition closed after two successful ordinary public GETs. Full original capture is not a whole-document legal review. No canonical graph, package or research note outside this lane was modified.</p>",
        "path": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09/cashapp-agreement.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-terms",
          "w23-cash-s-aup"
        ],
        "markdown": "Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App's obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See [the regulator packet](cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb.md). This narrows the earlier procedural gap; actual compliance, applicable modifications and a Lantern-specific correction/remedy trace remain unestablished. The original source-specific analysis below is preserved.\n\nObserved 9 September 2026. Bounded agreement lane; no customer account, support contact, private API, historical contract reconstruction or enforceability opinion. The main instrument is the agreement with **Block, Inc.** It grants service-access and fund-access discretion separately. Neither contractual power proves why any particular account was closed, nor does closure itself establish loss of ownership of the remaining money.\n\n## Instruments and custody\n\nThe current official Cash App Terms of Service (see source references) displays **Effective 7 February 2024; Last Updated 26 August 2026**. The original HTML and derived text are retained as `agreement-cashapp-tos.html` / `.txt`. The opening identifies Block, Inc. as the contracting company and says gray annotations have no legal effect (derived lines 1–10). Section II distinguishes revised terms from terms applicable to a dispute arising before a change (lines 213–219). This is a present public instrument, not proof of the terms accepted by the accounts in the 2025 Lantern example. Earlier search-index text displayed June 2026 dates; the captured original and fresh canonical page control this reading.\n\nThe incorporated Acceptable Use Policy (see source references) was captured separately as `agreement-cashapp-aup.html` / `.txt`. Its displayed text has no effective/updated date; 9 September is the observation date, not an inferred adoption date. The complete policy was read, emphasizing the clauses below. These instruments are two related company sources, not independent corroboration. Exact URLs, response status, acquisition timestamps, sizes, SHA-256 hashes and scoped reading extent are in `captures-agreement.json`.\n\n## Decision rights and limits\n\n| Mechanism | Operative provision and retained locator | Evidence boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| End service access | Terms XXIII.9, text 1276–1278: Block can suspend/terminate the account, associated accounts or service access for any reason; reasonable notification steps by email or next attempted app access. | Reasonable notice steps are not an advance-notice period, detailed-reasons promise or prior hearing. |\n| AUP enforcement | AUP II, text 70–74: reported violations can produce suspension/termination without notice; suspected violations may be investigated. | Read alongside the general notice wording, without declaring which clause legally prevails in a specific dispute. |\n| Delay ordinary cash-out | Terms VI.1(e)(iii), text 414: discretion to delay/limit transfers for financial exposure or investigation; also deferral/redirection/restriction for law, subpoena, court order or governmental request. | Do not say every restriction requires a court order; the clause includes other stated bases. |\n| Balance after closure | Terms XXIII.11, text 1282–1284: pending transactions settle; withdrawal of custodial funds less applicable fees is conditional/discretionary; a new linked bank may be required; risk and investigation holds are permitted. | No universal release deadline here. The broader gray annotation about returning funds is expressly non-operative. A hold is not proof of confiscation. |\n| Transaction refusal | Terms XXIII.4, text 1247–1252: funding sources and transactions can be restricted; notice has prohibited-transaction exceptions. | Available authority, not a demonstrated instruction from a particular network/bank. |\n| Compelled fund action | Terms XXIII.3, text 1245–1246: freeze, withholding or remittance in response to specified binding instruments. | Distinct from the discretionary risk clauses and ordinary closure. No such order was acquired for the Lantern example. |\n| Recover liabilities | Terms XXIII.1, text 1232–1242: recovery/setoff against account or linked funds for stated liabilities, disputes and other agreement grounds. | Do not convert contractual recovery language into a right to take every closed account's balance. |\n| Custodial access | Terms VI.3, text 443–445; XXIII.8, text 1274–1275: separate corporate/customer funds, possible pooling, Block agency, access through Cash App rather than direct withdrawal from custodial banks/brokerages. | A documented intermediary access condition; neither partner-bank direction nor sole legal ownership by Block follows. |\n\nThe AUP has separate restrictions for criminal activity (including child sexual-abuse material), adult-content sales, and businesses believed to create elevated financial risk or breach bank/card-network policies (AUP I, text 35–36, 54–55, 62–63). This is a contractual route by which external policy can matter. It identifies no particular bank, policy version, instruction or causal role in the Lantern closures. Its sanctions subsection separately contemplates indefinite holding in apparent violations; that is not the universal rule for closed accounts (text 50–51).\n\n## Bank roles and reconsideration\n\nThe terms distinguish the Cash App service contract from a cardholder's agreement with the issuing bank; that bank agreement governs card use/bank relationship in an inconsistency (VIII.1–2, text 620–626). No individual customer's product/card agreement was obtained, and no bank-specific closure authority is asserted here. Custodial placement, card issuance and an instruction to close are different relations.\n\nXXIII.19–20 contains a broad dispute definition and a separate pre-filing informal dispute process, including written notice, a personal conference and a 60-day negotiation window (text 1314–1323). This is not a routine support appeal or a promise to restore access. Only the opening and pre-filing paragraphs were substantively read; this packet does not evaluate enforceability, opt-outs or every arbitration condition. Parent's separately retained help article addresses operational closure review. Its ordinary withdrawal instructions should not be treated as overriding the agreement's hold conditions.\n\n## What this changes, and what remains missing\n\nThe public instruments establish a service-mediated path to money and a broad internal decision space. Competing explanations remain live: fraud/risk protection, compliance with an external obligation, enforcement of Cash App's own acceptable-use choices, or a mistaken decision. The contract alone cannot choose among them. Reinstatement review and balance release also remain different outcomes.\n\nThe most discriminating missing records are the actual closure reason/notice, applicable customer/product terms at the event date, any hold rationale and release ledger, and the internal or external instruction that caused the decision. The relevant holders would be Block's account/support/compliance records and, only if a bank or authority actually participated, that actor's corresponding instrument. No inference of current access to such records is made. No public account-level record was acquired for the 18-account Lantern example; no historical backfill, bank-name hunt or additional acquisition is proposed by this packet.\n\nAcquisition closed after two successful ordinary public GETs. Full original capture is not a whole-document legal review. No canonical graph, package or research note outside this lane was modified.\n",
        "file": "research/cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-agreement.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help",
        "title": "Cash App account-closure help: process and unresolved boundary",
        "description": "Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App's obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See the regulator packet(.",
        "html": "<p>Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App&#x27;s obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See <a href=\"/research/cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb\">the regulator packet</a>. This narrows the earlier procedural gap; actual compliance, applicable modifications and a Lantern-specific correction/remedy trace remain unestablished. The original source-specific analysis below is preserved.</p>\n<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Public help article, no stated publication/effective date. This is a provider&#x27;s account of its support process, not observed performance or a legal conclusion. [Your Account Is Closed](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The article describes a two-stage route: after contact with Support, the closure is first screened for appeal eligibility; an appropriate team then reviews possible re-enablement. The first reviewer is not named. It gives up to 10 days for review and says the customer will be contacted at completion. During the restriction, it says withdrawal and selling stocks or bitcoin remain possible. Pending direct deposits are to be returned to their originator in 3–5 business days. Cashing out may require a new bank account or debit card; normal availability is described as 1–3 business days, with faster options depending on the selected speed.</p>\n<p>This establishes a published route to contest closure, not an entitlement for every closure to enter a substantive appeal. No eligibility criteria, evidence disclosure rule, reviewer-independence requirement or outcome statistics appear in this article. Its general withdrawal guidance must be read with the agreement&#x27;s hold conditions; it does not prove a particular customer could withdraw immediately. Nor does it identify a Lantern-specific appeal or provide a correction-to-reinstatement example.</p>\n<p>An ambiguous final sentence says an account opened and linked to a closed Cash App account will also close. The account type is not specified there. Do not interpret it as Cash App closing an external bank account, or add a causal edge without clarification from an authoritative instrument.</p>\n<p>The financially consequential distinction is between service restoration and the exit route for remaining money. These may follow different processes. Investigate the contract&#x27;s hold authority and any actual adjudicated example separately before making a claim about confiscation, indefinite retention or practical remedy.</p>\n<p>Custody: cashapp-closed-help.html, SHA256 c0dfaf7195b720422d8ea5d16cdaac01b083249cf87f65426b61039047afa28b. The primary web reader returned zero lines; ordinary GET succeeded. Full public article content was read from the HTML&#x27;s embedded page-data object. No account, support submission, browser execution or nonpublic endpoint was used. captures-help.json records the acquisition. Extracted text is a reading aid, not a separate source.</p>",
        "path": "cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09/cashapp-help.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-help"
        ],
        "markdown": "Subsequent enforcement-record finding (9 September 2026): the public descriptions analyzed below do not exhaust Cash App's obligations. The16January2025 CFPB consent order expressly requires restriction explanations and an account-appeal procedure with a10-business-day grant/deny deadline (paragraph108(c)–(d), qualified as stated). See [the regulator packet](cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb.md). This narrows the earlier procedural gap; actual compliance, applicable modifications and a Lantern-specific correction/remedy trace remain unestablished. The original source-specific analysis below is preserved.\n\nObserved 9 September 2026. Public help article, no stated publication/effective date. This is a provider's account of its support process, not observed performance or a legal conclusion. Your Account Is Closed (see source references)\n\nThe article describes a two-stage route: after contact with Support, the closure is first screened for appeal eligibility; an appropriate team then reviews possible re-enablement. The first reviewer is not named. It gives up to 10 days for review and says the customer will be contacted at completion. During the restriction, it says withdrawal and selling stocks or bitcoin remain possible. Pending direct deposits are to be returned to their originator in 3–5 business days. Cashing out may require a new bank account or debit card; normal availability is described as 1–3 business days, with faster options depending on the selected speed.\n\nThis establishes a published route to contest closure, not an entitlement for every closure to enter a substantive appeal. No eligibility criteria, evidence disclosure rule, reviewer-independence requirement or outcome statistics appear in this article. Its general withdrawal guidance must be read with the agreement's hold conditions; it does not prove a particular customer could withdraw immediately. Nor does it identify a Lantern-specific appeal or provide a correction-to-reinstatement example.\n\nAn ambiguous final sentence says an account opened and linked to a closed Cash App account will also close. The account type is not specified there. Do not interpret it as Cash App closing an external bank account, or add a causal edge without clarification from an authoritative instrument.\n\nThe financially consequential distinction is between service restoration and the exit route for remaining money. These may follow different processes. Investigate the contract's hold authority and any actual adjudicated example separately before making a claim about confiscation, indefinite retention or practical remedy.\n\nCustody: cashapp-closed-help.html, SHA256 c0dfaf7195b720422d8ea5d16cdaac01b083249cf87f65426b61039047afa28b. The primary web reader returned zero lines; ordinary GET succeeded. Full public article content was read from the HTML's embedded page-data object. No account, support submission, browser execution or nonpublic endpoint was used. captures-help.json records the acquisition. Extracted text is a reading aid, not a separate source.\n",
        "file": "research/cashapp-authority-wave-2026-09-09-cashapp-help.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb",
        "title": "CFPB / Block: account restrictions, error redress and accountable decision-making",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. The operative instrument is the 16 January 2025 consent order(httplocal research file administrative proceeding 2025-CFPB-0001, against Block, Inc., defined to include successors and assigns. It explicitly reaches account-restriction appeals as well as transaction-error investigation. It supplies a legally required process and a re",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. The operative instrument is the [16 January 2025 consent order](http[local research file] administrative proceeding <strong>2025-CFPB-0001</strong>, against <strong>Block, Inc.</strong>, defined to include successors and assigns. It explicitly reaches account-restriction appeals as well as transaction-error investigation. It supplies a legally required process and a regulator-monitoring route; it does not establish that any particular appeal succeeded, that all customers actually received timely service, or that Lantern caused the investigated conduct.</p>\n<h2 id=\"instrument-consent-and-currentness\">Instrument, consent and currentness</h2>\n<p>Order ¶¶1–3, PDF 2–10, establish jurisdiction, effective date on administrative-docket entry and definitions. ¶4, PDF 11, identifies Block as a Delaware corporation operating Cash App. The <a>stipulation</a>.</p>\n<p>The retained [official case page](http[local research file] displays “Post Order/Post Judgment”; its last-modified date is 24 January 2025. The retained [official docket](http[local research file] likewise displays post-order status and lists only document 001 (order) and 002 (stipulation), both filed 16 January 2025; last modified 16 January 2025. Two targeted official-domain searches for this docket/order with termination and 2026 amendment terms did not reveal a later CFPB instrument. This is a scoped public-record observation, <strong>not certification that no written modification exists</strong>. Order ¶¶154–155 permit written changes to non-material requirements for good cause, including extensions/reporting changes. ¶159, PDF 73–74, sets termination at the later of five years from effective date or the relevant qualifying enforcement-action extension, subject to written amendment, suspension, waiver or termination. The initial five-year date is 16 January 2030; the packet does not assert an unchanged end date.</p>\n<p>The [official 16 January 2025 notice](http[local research file] is now expressly marked archived, with an outdated-content warning and last-modified date 25 June 2026. That modification stamp is not a new order date. Use the operative order for exact hours, remedies and exceptions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-bureau-found\">What the Bureau found</h2>\n<p>The order describes failures across several historical periods, not one uniform period applicable to every finding. ¶¶7–18, PDF 12–16: no live telephone customer support until February 2021, misleading contact representations, scams exploiting fake support numbers, and slow/form responses. ¶¶24–27, PDF 18–19: automatic “need more information,” “pushback” and bulk “inquiry” communications delayed or prematurely closed error cases and shifted work back to consumers. These are described templates/macros; the instrument does not establish a generative-AI system or join these practices to Lantern.</p>\n<p>The most direct account-access findings are ¶¶34–36, PDF 21. CFPB found missing restriction notifications, generic terms-of-service explanations, failure proactively to publicize the appeal process introduced around 2021, slow reconsideration, weeks to unfreeze even successful appeals, and consumers unaware that withdrawal might be available. ¶¶55–58, PDF 26–28, explain the regulator&#x27;s unfairness finding: consumers&#x27; dependence on reaching the company made loss of access difficult to avoid. This establishes a historically identified failure of recourse, rather than proof that closure always confiscates funds.</p>\n<p>Transaction-error findings are separate: ¶¶19–33,39–48 and72–105, PDF 16–25,32–40, describe deficient investigations, denied/delayed provisional credits and refunds, missing explanations/document-access notices, misapplied reporting windows, and wrongful substitution of linked-bank chargebacks. The rule-and-order analysis does not depend solely on Cash App&#x27;s help wording or contract discretion.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-must-do-what\">Who must do what</h2>\n<p>All locators below refer to the order; PDF and printed page numbers agree.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Decision or duty</th>\n<th>Actor and operative requirement</th>\n<th>Exact scope / limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Reachable customer service</td>\n<td>Block must maintain service able to intake and appropriately resolve or escalate complaints, error notices, account-access issues and fraud reports, including noncustomers; publish access instructions. ¶108(a)–(b), PDF 44–45.</td>\n<td>Service available 24 hours/day; human voice at least 12 hours/day; human chat at least 18 hours/day. Do not turn the notice&#x27;s shorthand into 24 hours of human telephone support.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Restriction notice</td>\n<td>Within 24 hours of freezing, suspending, locking, closing or otherwise restricting an account, provide written explanation of the decision and appeal procedure. ¶108(c), PDF 45–46.</td>\n<td>Exception is expressly “unless prohibited from doing so by law enforcement.” Except when funds are frozen, also say whether and how funds can be transferred out, if possible. The frozen-funds exception belongs to the transfer-information limb; do not silently extend it to every notice duty.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Account appeal</td>\n<td>Establish/maintain an appeal or change-status procedure, clearly publish instructions on the support primary webpage and in-app; grant or deny within 10 business days from receiving the request, with written explanation if denied. ¶108(d), PDF 46–47.</td>\n<td>This is an account-restriction requirement, not merely a transaction-error rule. It does not guarantee reinstatement or establish an independent external adjudicator for each appeal.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Transaction-error decision and evidence</td>\n<td>Prompt, thorough, reasonable investigation; report results within 3 business days of completion; explain no-error/different-error findings, notify the right to relied-on documents and promptly supply copies on request. Correct found errors within 1 business day; provisionally credit within 10 business days if investigation incomplete. ¶108(e), PDF 47.</td>\n<td>Applies to a defined Notice of Error, ¶3(f), PDF 9–10. Do not transfer this express document-access right wholesale to every account-closure appeal.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Stop obstructing error investigation</td>\n<td>No unnecessary-information delaying communications, required police/merchant contact or extra information as investigation prerequisites; no stopping/delaying because further information was not supplied; no sending qualifying linked-account notices away to the issuing bank. ¶107(a)–(g), PDF 41–44.</td>\n<td>Concerns the specified financial-service/error processes. This is not a prohibition on all lawful verification, fraud control or information requests.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fraud controls and account exclusion</td>\n<td>Policies must identify accounts suspected of fraudulently inducing transactions, prevent their operation and prevent associated individuals returning; track complaints/trends, provide refunds under Cash App policies and warnings for suspected scam transfers. ¶108(f), PDF 48.</td>\n<td>The same order requires anti-fraud restrictions <strong>and</strong> notice/appeal safeguards. No named signal supplier, mandatory Lantern membership or cross-platform exclusion instruction appears.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Internal responsibility</td>\n<td>Committee with required risk, compliance, business, customer-operations and data-science roles, and three working groups; assessment, escalation, reporting, resources and correction duties. ¶109, PDF 49–52. Board ultimately responsible; executives/Board review plans and submissions; annual Board-approved sworn progress report. ¶¶113–116, PDF 54–56.</td>\n<td>These are mandated corporate responsibilities. The order does not identify outside NGOs or vendors as decision-makers.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Plans and supervisory records</td>\n<td>Create/implement Compliance Plan within 120 days; provide it to Bureau on request. ¶¶110–112, PDF 53–54. Keep compliance, redress and complaint records in original electronic form, accessible for historical analysis; produce on request. ¶¶143–145, PDF 67–69.</td>\n<td>Compliance Plan is not expressly subject to the same prior non-objection procedure as the Redress Plan. Required plans/reports were not obtained here.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Regulator oversight and complaint route</td>\n<td>Identify CFPB complaint channel, remain on Company Portal and comply with response requirements. ¶¶148–149, PDF 70. On written request, additional sworn reports/testimony/documents within 14 days; consenting affiliated interviewees may have counsel. ¶¶150–153, PDF 71.</td>\n<td>This supplies monitoring and escalation powers, not proof that CFPB independently adjudicates every restriction appeal. Bureau enforces order; ¶162, PDF 74–75.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The earlier help article&#x27;s eligibility screen and unspecified “up to 10 days” do not exhaust the operative duty. The order measures the appeal/change-status decision from receipt of the request and expressly uses business days. Establishing an actual violation would require the applicable procedure, request/notice dates and response, plus any relevant written modification; comparing two short public descriptions is insufficient.</p>\n<h2 id=\"required-money-allocation-and-timing\">Required money, allocation and timing</h2>\n<p>Order ¶¶117–125, PDF 56–60, require <strong>USD 75 million</strong> to be reserved or placed in a segregated deposit account within 10 days; redress to affected consumers is capped at <strong>USD 120 million</strong>. These are commitments, not observed paid amounts. ¶126–128, PDF 61, separately assess a <strong>USD 55 million civil penalty</strong>, payable to CFPB within 10 days for its Civil Penalty Fund. The notice&#x27;s USD 175 million headline is the upper redress figure plus that penalty, not evidence USD 175 million reached consumers. Per ¶160, PDF 74, unspecified day limits are calendar days.</p>\n<p>A further allocation distinction matters: if completed consumer redress is below USD 75 million, ¶123 requires the shortfall to be sent to CFPB 90 days after the Redress Report. CFPB may use it for further redress and may send impracticable/inappropriate-to-distribute residue to Treasury (¶124). Thus the minimum commitment does not guarantee USD 75 million is directly received by consumers. No return to Block is permitted for funds paid (¶132, PDF 63), and redress cannot be conditioned on customers waiving rights (¶125).</p>\n<p>Affected categories and formulae are in ¶3(a), PDF 3–8, and ¶118, PDF 56–57. They include noninvestigated and wrongly timed unauthorized-transfer claims, partial-refund cases, omitted provisional credits, and frozen accounts that were later unfrozen. The latter requires a freeze of at least 14 days and balance of at least USD 25, with exclusions for specified law-enforcement/government/statutory grounds and customer-caused verification delay. Its payment is a pro-rata portion of USD 50, not a universal USD 50 per closed account. The category definition refers to transactions as of 1 July 2019; the order&#x27;s release is separately limited to known pre-effective-date practices (¶157, PDF 73).</p>\n<p>Within 120 days Block must submit its Redress Plan for the Enforcement Director&#x27;s review/non-objection. The Director may require revision, due within 15 days; Block must follow the non-objected-to plan. ¶¶119–120, PDF 57–59. It must pay credit redress and begin non-credit redress within 30 days of non-objection (¶121); completion-report due within 15 days after plan completion (¶122). The report must state recipient/account counts and amounts paid. This packet did not obtain that report, the non-objection, plan-level distribution deadlines or any extension. A required payment is not evidence of receipt or timely completion.</p>\n<h2 id=\"integration-and-next-discriminating-record\">Integration and next discriminating record</h2>\n<p>Defensible directional relations are <strong>CFPB → Block: imposes account-restriction notice/appeal and error-redress obligations</strong>; <strong>Block Board → compliance: has ultimate responsibility</strong>; <strong>CFPB Enforcement Director → Redress Plan: reviews/non-objects or requires revision</strong>; <strong>Block → affected consumers/CFPB: owes specified redress/penalty obligations</strong>. Distinguish each from implementation and payment events. The record supplies a material counterweight to an unrestricted-private-discretion narrative: a regulator identified procedural harms and imposed deadlines, reasons, record access for error claims and reporting. It also orders anti-fraud account exclusion, so neither unrestricted access nor unconditional restoration follows.</p>\n<p>No mention of Lantern or Tech Coalition was found in the complete extracted order/stipulation or case/notice reading. That does not prove Cash App never uses those systems; it means this instrument supplies no attribution to them. General account restriction, transaction error, redress eligibility and Lantern signal correction remain separate mechanisms unless a later record joins them.</p>\n<p>The strongest next discriminator is the <strong>Board-approved annual compliance report and implemented account-appeal procedure under ¶¶108(d),110–116</strong>, plus any written modification; for distribution, the <strong>Redress Plan, non-objection and ¶122 Redress Report</strong>. Custodians are Block and CFPB Enforcement. These would show how the legal requirement became a working process, what exceptions were applied and what was actually paid. Their existence is required by the order; this packet does not assert that they are publicly released. Acquisition stops here for the forest assessment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-reading-scope\">Custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p>Five originals were obtained by ordinary unauthenticated GET, all HTTP 200, on 9 September 2026 at approximately 10:53 UTC. Metadata, final URLs, byte counts and SHA-256 are in <code>captures-cfpb.json</code>. <code>cfpb-order.pdf</code> SHA-256 <code>8b72ad0538889fd6b4e9d1481806611955fb9a0e4e219bb87f2809471c351ed1</code>; <code>cfpb-stipulation.pdf</code> SHA-256 <code>7634dc07a22f9abfad610af9464c10101a5f897190fa6b9fba2597316f227100</code>.</p>\n<p>The order was read in full through the extracted text of PDF 1–75, with PDF 46 visually inspected for the notice/exception/appeal structure. The stipulation was read in full through PDF 1–6, with PDF 6 visually inspected because extraction of the final waivers/signature page was degraded. The full main article/case/docket bodies and displayed metadata were read from retained HTML; navigation/footer inventories were not treated as substantive source reading. Captured originals are sources; extracts and two PNGs are reading aids. No appeal submission, private account, outreach, paid route, canonical edit or further branch was undertaken.</p>",
        "path": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09/cfpb.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-order",
          "w23-cash-s-stipulation",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-case",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-docket",
          "w23-cash-s-cfpb-notice"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. The operative instrument is the 16 January 2025 consent order (see source references) administrative proceeding **2025-CFPB-0001**, against **Block, Inc.**, defined to include successors and assigns. It explicitly reaches account-restriction appeals as well as transaction-error investigation. It supplies a legally required process and a regulator-monitoring route; it does not establish that any particular appeal succeeded, that all customers actually received timely service, or that Lantern caused the investigated conduct.\n\n## Instrument, consent and currentness\n\nOrder ¶¶1–3, PDF 2–10, establish jurisdiction, effective date on administrative-docket entry and definitions. ¶4, PDF 11, identifies Block as a Delaware corporation operating Cash App. The stipulation.\n\nThe retained official case page (see source references) displays “Post Order/Post Judgment”; its last-modified date is 24 January 2025. The retained official docket (see source references) likewise displays post-order status and lists only document 001 (order) and 002 (stipulation), both filed 16 January 2025; last modified 16 January 2025. Two targeted official-domain searches for this docket/order with termination and 2026 amendment terms did not reveal a later CFPB instrument. This is a scoped public-record observation, **not certification that no written modification exists**. Order ¶¶154–155 permit written changes to non-material requirements for good cause, including extensions/reporting changes. ¶159, PDF 73–74, sets termination at the later of five years from effective date or the relevant qualifying enforcement-action extension, subject to written amendment, suspension, waiver or termination. The initial five-year date is 16 January 2030; the packet does not assert an unchanged end date.\n\nThe official 16 January 2025 notice (see source references) is now expressly marked archived, with an outdated-content warning and last-modified date 25 June 2026. That modification stamp is not a new order date. Use the operative order for exact hours, remedies and exceptions.\n\n## What the Bureau found\n\nThe order describes failures across several historical periods, not one uniform period applicable to every finding. ¶¶7–18, PDF 12–16: no live telephone customer support until February 2021, misleading contact representations, scams exploiting fake support numbers, and slow/form responses. ¶¶24–27, PDF 18–19: automatic “need more information,” “pushback” and bulk “inquiry” communications delayed or prematurely closed error cases and shifted work back to consumers. These are described templates/macros; the instrument does not establish a generative-AI system or join these practices to Lantern.\n\nThe most direct account-access findings are ¶¶34–36, PDF 21. CFPB found missing restriction notifications, generic terms-of-service explanations, failure proactively to publicize the appeal process introduced around 2021, slow reconsideration, weeks to unfreeze even successful appeals, and consumers unaware that withdrawal might be available. ¶¶55–58, PDF 26–28, explain the regulator's unfairness finding: consumers' dependence on reaching the company made loss of access difficult to avoid. This establishes a historically identified failure of recourse, rather than proof that closure always confiscates funds.\n\nTransaction-error findings are separate: ¶¶19–33,39–48 and72–105, PDF 16–25,32–40, describe deficient investigations, denied/delayed provisional credits and refunds, missing explanations/document-access notices, misapplied reporting windows, and wrongful substitution of linked-bank chargebacks. The rule-and-order analysis does not depend solely on Cash App's help wording or contract discretion.\n\n## Who must do what\n\nAll locators below refer to the order; PDF and printed page numbers agree.\n\n| Decision or duty | Actor and operative requirement | Exact scope / limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Reachable customer service | Block must maintain service able to intake and appropriately resolve or escalate complaints, error notices, account-access issues and fraud reports, including noncustomers; publish access instructions. ¶108(a)–(b), PDF 44–45. | Service available 24 hours/day; human voice at least 12 hours/day; human chat at least 18 hours/day. Do not turn the notice's shorthand into 24 hours of human telephone support. |\n| Restriction notice | Within 24 hours of freezing, suspending, locking, closing or otherwise restricting an account, provide written explanation of the decision and appeal procedure. ¶108(c), PDF 45–46. | Exception is expressly “unless prohibited from doing so by law enforcement.” Except when funds are frozen, also say whether and how funds can be transferred out, if possible. The frozen-funds exception belongs to the transfer-information limb; do not silently extend it to every notice duty. |\n| Account appeal | Establish/maintain an appeal or change-status procedure, clearly publish instructions on the support primary webpage and in-app; grant or deny within 10 business days from receiving the request, with written explanation if denied. ¶108(d), PDF 46–47. | This is an account-restriction requirement, not merely a transaction-error rule. It does not guarantee reinstatement or establish an independent external adjudicator for each appeal. |\n| Transaction-error decision and evidence | Prompt, thorough, reasonable investigation; report results within 3 business days of completion; explain no-error/different-error findings, notify the right to relied-on documents and promptly supply copies on request. Correct found errors within 1 business day; provisionally credit within 10 business days if investigation incomplete. ¶108(e), PDF 47. | Applies to a defined Notice of Error, ¶3(f), PDF 9–10. Do not transfer this express document-access right wholesale to every account-closure appeal. |\n| Stop obstructing error investigation | No unnecessary-information delaying communications, required police/merchant contact or extra information as investigation prerequisites; no stopping/delaying because further information was not supplied; no sending qualifying linked-account notices away to the issuing bank. ¶107(a)–(g), PDF 41–44. | Concerns the specified financial-service/error processes. This is not a prohibition on all lawful verification, fraud control or information requests. |\n| Fraud controls and account exclusion | Policies must identify accounts suspected of fraudulently inducing transactions, prevent their operation and prevent associated individuals returning; track complaints/trends, provide refunds under Cash App policies and warnings for suspected scam transfers. ¶108(f), PDF 48. | The same order requires anti-fraud restrictions **and** notice/appeal safeguards. No named signal supplier, mandatory Lantern membership or cross-platform exclusion instruction appears. |\n| Internal responsibility | Committee with required risk, compliance, business, customer-operations and data-science roles, and three working groups; assessment, escalation, reporting, resources and correction duties. ¶109, PDF 49–52. Board ultimately responsible; executives/Board review plans and submissions; annual Board-approved sworn progress report. ¶¶113–116, PDF 54–56. | These are mandated corporate responsibilities. The order does not identify outside NGOs or vendors as decision-makers. |\n| Plans and supervisory records | Create/implement Compliance Plan within 120 days; provide it to Bureau on request. ¶¶110–112, PDF 53–54. Keep compliance, redress and complaint records in original electronic form, accessible for historical analysis; produce on request. ¶¶143–145, PDF 67–69. | Compliance Plan is not expressly subject to the same prior non-objection procedure as the Redress Plan. Required plans/reports were not obtained here. |\n| Regulator oversight and complaint route | Identify CFPB complaint channel, remain on Company Portal and comply with response requirements. ¶¶148–149, PDF 70. On written request, additional sworn reports/testimony/documents within 14 days; consenting affiliated interviewees may have counsel. ¶¶150–153, PDF 71. | This supplies monitoring and escalation powers, not proof that CFPB independently adjudicates every restriction appeal. Bureau enforces order; ¶162, PDF 74–75. |\n\nThe earlier help article's eligibility screen and unspecified “up to 10 days” do not exhaust the operative duty. The order measures the appeal/change-status decision from receipt of the request and expressly uses business days. Establishing an actual violation would require the applicable procedure, request/notice dates and response, plus any relevant written modification; comparing two short public descriptions is insufficient.\n\n## Required money, allocation and timing\n\nOrder ¶¶117–125, PDF 56–60, require **USD 75 million** to be reserved or placed in a segregated deposit account within 10 days; redress to affected consumers is capped at **USD 120 million**. These are commitments, not observed paid amounts. ¶126–128, PDF 61, separately assess a **USD 55 million civil penalty**, payable to CFPB within 10 days for its Civil Penalty Fund. The notice's USD 175 million headline is the upper redress figure plus that penalty, not evidence USD 175 million reached consumers. Per ¶160, PDF 74, unspecified day limits are calendar days.\n\nA further allocation distinction matters: if completed consumer redress is below USD 75 million, ¶123 requires the shortfall to be sent to CFPB 90 days after the Redress Report. CFPB may use it for further redress and may send impracticable/inappropriate-to-distribute residue to Treasury (¶124). Thus the minimum commitment does not guarantee USD 75 million is directly received by consumers. No return to Block is permitted for funds paid (¶132, PDF 63), and redress cannot be conditioned on customers waiving rights (¶125).\n\nAffected categories and formulae are in ¶3(a), PDF 3–8, and ¶118, PDF 56–57. They include noninvestigated and wrongly timed unauthorized-transfer claims, partial-refund cases, omitted provisional credits, and frozen accounts that were later unfrozen. The latter requires a freeze of at least 14 days and balance of at least USD 25, with exclusions for specified law-enforcement/government/statutory grounds and customer-caused verification delay. Its payment is a pro-rata portion of USD 50, not a universal USD 50 per closed account. The category definition refers to transactions as of 1 July 2019; the order's release is separately limited to known pre-effective-date practices (¶157, PDF 73).\n\nWithin 120 days Block must submit its Redress Plan for the Enforcement Director's review/non-objection. The Director may require revision, due within 15 days; Block must follow the non-objected-to plan. ¶¶119–120, PDF 57–59. It must pay credit redress and begin non-credit redress within 30 days of non-objection (¶121); completion-report due within 15 days after plan completion (¶122). The report must state recipient/account counts and amounts paid. This packet did not obtain that report, the non-objection, plan-level distribution deadlines or any extension. A required payment is not evidence of receipt or timely completion.\n\n## Integration and next discriminating record\n\nDefensible directional relations are **CFPB → Block: imposes account-restriction notice/appeal and error-redress obligations**; **Block Board → compliance: has ultimate responsibility**; **CFPB Enforcement Director → Redress Plan: reviews/non-objects or requires revision**; **Block → affected consumers/CFPB: owes specified redress/penalty obligations**. Distinguish each from implementation and payment events. The record supplies a material counterweight to an unrestricted-private-discretion narrative: a regulator identified procedural harms and imposed deadlines, reasons, record access for error claims and reporting. It also orders anti-fraud account exclusion, so neither unrestricted access nor unconditional restoration follows.\n\nNo mention of Lantern or Tech Coalition was found in the complete extracted order/stipulation or case/notice reading. That does not prove Cash App never uses those systems; it means this instrument supplies no attribution to them. General account restriction, transaction error, redress eligibility and Lantern signal correction remain separate mechanisms unless a later record joins them.\n\nThe strongest next discriminator is the **Board-approved annual compliance report and implemented account-appeal procedure under ¶¶108(d),110–116**, plus any written modification; for distribution, the **Redress Plan, non-objection and ¶122 Redress Report**. Custodians are Block and CFPB Enforcement. These would show how the legal requirement became a working process, what exceptions were applied and what was actually paid. Their existence is required by the order; this packet does not assert that they are publicly released. Acquisition stops here for the forest assessment.\n\n## Custody and reading scope\n\nFive originals were obtained by ordinary unauthenticated GET, all HTTP 200, on 9 September 2026 at approximately 10:53 UTC. Metadata, final URLs, byte counts and SHA-256 are in `captures-cfpb.json`. `cfpb-order.pdf` SHA-256 `8b72ad0538889fd6b4e9d1481806611955fb9a0e4e219bb87f2809471c351ed1`; `cfpb-stipulation.pdf` SHA-256 `7634dc07a22f9abfad610af9464c10101a5f897190fa6b9fba2597316f227100`.\n\nThe order was read in full through the extracted text of PDF 1–75, with PDF 46 visually inspected for the notice/exception/appeal structure. The stipulation was read in full through PDF 1–6, with PDF 6 visually inspected because extraction of the final waivers/signature page was degraded. The full main article/case/docket bodies and displayed metadata were read from retained HTML; navigation/footer inventories were not treated as substantive source reading. Captured originals are sources; extracts and two PNGs are reading aids. No appeal submission, private account, outreach, paid route, canonical edit or further branch was undertaken.\n",
        "file": "research/cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures",
        "title": "Block disclosures: paid, promised and still unresolved",
        "description": "Observed9September2026. This lane tests execution evidence against the regulator instruments. It uses official SEC filings and Block's contemporaneous response, with a separately labelled remediation-site lead whose official referral was established in the subsequent July AG run. Exact source URLs, filing dates and scoped reads are in root-reader-sources.jso",
        "html": "<p>Observed9September2026. This lane tests execution evidence against the regulator instruments. It uses official SEC filings and Block&#x27;s contemporaneous response, with a separately labelled remediation-site lead whose official referral was established in the subsequent July AG run. Exact source URLs, filing dates and scoped reads are in root-reader-sources.json. No underlying bank-transfer receipt, consumer account or internal compliance report was obtained.</p>\n<h2 id=\"payment-evidence\">Payment evidence</h2>\n<p>Block&#x27;s [2024 Form10-K](http[local research file] filed24February2025, states in its litigation note (printed144) that the CFPB civil penalty of $55million was paid in January2025. This is a company-reported completed payment. The next paragraph describes an $80million state-regulator settlement with payments expected by/about February2025. Expectation is not payment confirmation. The redress amount in the filing is agreement language, not a completed consumer-distribution figure; the operative order&#x27;s reserve, cap and shortfall mechanics are separately examined in cfpb.md.</p>\n<p>The later [2025 Form10-K](http[local research file] litigation note (printed142–143) does not provide an acquired settlement-specific receipt or completed redress total. That scoped omission is not evidence of nonpayment. A further first-quarter2025 filing was only opened and keyword-searched; it supplies no additional substantive payment finding in this pass.</p>\n<p>A website identifying itself with docket2025-CFPB-0001 reports that checks began mailing on8June2026. Its public home was read. <strong>Subsequent source-provenance update,9September2026:</strong> the retained official Oregon AG8July announcement directly links that exact domain; California also links it through a publisher-supplied Proofpoint wrapper. Root independently extracted both hrefs. Official AG referral is therefore established, correcting the earlier scoped search failure. The site claim remains distinct from an administrator-appointment instrument, verified individual receipt or complete payout total; none of those was obtained. See <a href=\"/research/cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution\">July AG packet</a> and its retained announcement originals. No personal information was entered and no contact was made.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-disclosure-changes\">Current disclosure changes</h2>\n<p>The [second-quarter2026 Form10-Q](http[local research file] filed5August2026, reports a separate July2026 multistate attorney-general resolution concerning customer complaints/disputes, without giving an amount in the inspected paragraph (printed33). It also says SEC staff concluded their investigation in March2026 without intending to recommend enforcement. DOJ discussions continued; Block recorded a $526million estimated loss. This is an accrual, not an assessed or paid fine or completed settlement. These are issuer accounts; the underlying agency or court instruments were not acquired in this lane. Their disclosed changes show why a2025 enforcement list cannot be treated as the current state.</p>\n<p>The July attorney-general disposition is the most relevant next primary-record lead: it may add or revise customer-remedy obligations. The DOJ accrual and shareholder cases are distinct matters. They do not establish a common chain of command, a Lantern role, or that every allegation was sustained. No new branch was acquired after locating these facts in the selected filing.</p>\n<h2 id=\"respondents-position-and-limits\">Respondent&#x27;s position and limits</h2>\n<p>In its [16January2025 response](http[local research file] Block disputed the CFPB&#x27;s characterization, described the issues as historical, and asserted improvements to support, security and detection. That preserves the respondent&#x27;s account; it does not substitute for verification of outcomes or compliance with the resulting order.</p>\n<p>Official SEC submission metadata was captured successfully to identify filings. Ordinary GETs of the2025K,2026Q2 and Block-response pages returned403; these routes are closed. Their saved HTML files are explicitly error responses, not retained originals. The primary web reader worked and provided the scoped substantive passages above. Investor filing-list pages rendered only navigation, so the successful public SEC metadata route supplied exact filing addresses. No challenge bypass or authenticated route was used.</p>\n<p>Root additionally read retained CFPB order PDF44–47,50–55,74–75. These provide actual restriction-notice/appeal requirements, board/executive reporting responsibilities and enforcement/termination limits. The whole order and stipulation are covered by Carver&#x27;s separate packet and Hubble&#x27;s independent review, not by a claimed full root read.</p>",
        "path": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09/issuer-disclosures.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-issuer2024",
          "w23-cash-s-issuer2025",
          "w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2",
          "w23-cash-s-response",
          "w23-cash-s-unverified-redress-site",
          "w23-cash-s-ag-referral"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed9September2026. This lane tests execution evidence against the regulator instruments. It uses official SEC filings and Block's contemporaneous response, with a separately labelled remediation-site lead whose official referral was established in the subsequent July AG run. Exact source URLs, filing dates and scoped reads are in root-reader-sources.json. No underlying bank-transfer receipt, consumer account or internal compliance report was obtained.\n\n## Payment evidence\n\nBlock's 2024 Form10-K (see source references) filed24February2025, states in its litigation note (printed144) that the CFPB civil penalty of $55million was paid in January2025. This is a company-reported completed payment. The next paragraph describes an $80million state-regulator settlement with payments expected by/about February2025. Expectation is not payment confirmation. The redress amount in the filing is agreement language, not a completed consumer-distribution figure; the operative order's reserve, cap and shortfall mechanics are separately examined in cfpb.md.\n\nThe later 2025 Form10-K (see source references) litigation note (printed142–143) does not provide an acquired settlement-specific receipt or completed redress total. That scoped omission is not evidence of nonpayment. A further first-quarter2025 filing was only opened and keyword-searched; it supplies no additional substantive payment finding in this pass.\n\nA website identifying itself with docket2025-CFPB-0001 reports that checks began mailing on8June2026. Its public home was read. **Subsequent source-provenance update,9September2026:** the retained official Oregon AG8July announcement directly links that exact domain; California also links it through a publisher-supplied Proofpoint wrapper. Root independently extracted both hrefs. Official AG referral is therefore established, correcting the earlier scoped search failure. The site claim remains distinct from an administrator-appointment instrument, verified individual receipt or complete payout total; none of those was obtained. See [July AG packet](cashapp-ag-resolution-wave-2026-09-09-july-ag-resolution.md) and its retained announcement originals. No personal information was entered and no contact was made.\n\n## Current disclosure changes\n\nThe second-quarter2026 Form10-Q (see source references) filed5August2026, reports a separate July2026 multistate attorney-general resolution concerning customer complaints/disputes, without giving an amount in the inspected paragraph (printed33). It also says SEC staff concluded their investigation in March2026 without intending to recommend enforcement. DOJ discussions continued; Block recorded a $526million estimated loss. This is an accrual, not an assessed or paid fine or completed settlement. These are issuer accounts; the underlying agency or court instruments were not acquired in this lane. Their disclosed changes show why a2025 enforcement list cannot be treated as the current state.\n\nThe July attorney-general disposition is the most relevant next primary-record lead: it may add or revise customer-remedy obligations. The DOJ accrual and shareholder cases are distinct matters. They do not establish a common chain of command, a Lantern role, or that every allegation was sustained. No new branch was acquired after locating these facts in the selected filing.\n\n## Respondent's position and limits\n\nIn its 16January2025 response (see source references) Block disputed the CFPB's characterization, described the issues as historical, and asserted improvements to support, security and detection. That preserves the respondent's account; it does not substitute for verification of outcomes or compliance with the resulting order.\n\nOfficial SEC submission metadata was captured successfully to identify filings. Ordinary GETs of the2025K,2026Q2 and Block-response pages returned403; these routes are closed. Their saved HTML files are explicitly error responses, not retained originals. The primary web reader worked and provided the scoped substantive passages above. Investor filing-list pages rendered only navigation, so the successful public SEC metadata route supplied exact filing addresses. No challenge bypass or authenticated route was used.\n\nRoot additionally read retained CFPB order PDF44–47,50–55,74–75. These provide actual restriction-notice/appeal requirements, board/executive reporting responsibilities and enforcement/termination limits. The whole order and stipulation are covered by Carver's separate packet and Hubble's independent review, not by a claimed full root read.\n",
        "file": "research/cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-issuer-disclosures.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls",
        "title": "Block/Cash App multistate BSA/AML order: decision rights and public limits",
        "description": "Bounded regulator lane, observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed after the original operative text, one fuller official copy, its current state landing page and the coordinator's explanatory release. No outreach, paid/private access, additional state case or NYDFS acquisition. Root's Block disclosures and the separate CFPB lane are not incorporated here",
        "html": "<p>Bounded regulator lane, observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed after the original operative text, one fuller official copy, its current state landing page and the coordinator&#x27;s explanatory release. No outreach, paid/private access, additional state case or NYDFS acquisition. Root&#x27;s Block disclosures and the separate CFPB lane are not incorporated here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"result\">Result</h2>\n<p>This is an actual consent order binding Block, Inc., rather than a voluntary industry recommendation. It establishes a state-to-company oversight mechanism: state Executive Committee receives reports/workpapers and can question the consultant; Block&#x27;s board approves corrective plans and carries ultimate compliance responsibility; an independent consultant assesses and validates the work. The public instrument does not reveal the consultant&#x27;s identity, executed engagement, specific implemented controls, payment receipts or completed remediation. It establishes no Lantern causal link and no bank-owner instruction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"sources-versions-and-scoped-reading\">Sources, versions and scoped reading</h2>\n<p>The [CSBS announcement](http[local research file] dated <strong>15 January 2025</strong>, links a [10-page order body](http[local research file] That PDF ends by saying signature pages follow, but contains no signature pages or appendices. It is retained as <code>state-csbs-order-body.pdf</code>; its operative pages 1–10 were read, with emphasis on recitals, II governance, III payment, IV enforcement, V release and VI duration/private rights.</p>\n<p>The [Maine enforcement entry](http[local research file] dated <strong>16 January 2025</strong>, reproduces the order and links a [22-page fuller official copy](http[local research file] retained as <code>state-maine-order-full.pdf</code>. Maine&#x27;s HTML operative sections and signature/appendix text were read; the PDF&#x27;s signatures/appendices were extracted, and PDF pages <strong>11, 19, 20 and 21</strong> were rendered locally and visually inspected. The text layer of PDF11 is empty although the signed page is visible. Maine&#x27;s HTML is a derivative presentation of the same instrument, not independent corroboration; use the PDF for signature/table ambiguities. The different copies are not represented as byte-identical.</p>\n<p>Originals, URLs, retrieval timestamps, hashes, reading scopes and derivative ancestry are in <code>captures-state.json</code>. All four public GETs succeeded. The web screenshot route returned cache-miss errors; the already retained PDF was rendered locally with pypdfium2 instead, without another network attempt.</p>\n<h2 id=\"parties-examination-and-allegation-boundaries\">Parties, examination and allegation boundaries</h2>\n<p>The order names <strong>Block, Inc., formerly Square, Inc., NMLS 942933</strong>, as the company operating Cash App. The other parties are participating states&#x27; money-transmission regulatory agencies. CSBS and MTRA supply coordination protocols, and the states work through the Multi-State MSB Examination Taskforce (MMET); they are not additional company respondents or substituted state enforcement authorities. Jack Dorsey signs for Block as Block Head and Chairperson (Maine PDF11), not as a separately named personal respondent.</p>\n<p>The recitals describe an examination begun around <strong>15 May 2023</strong>, covering <strong>1 January 2021–31 March 2023</strong>, conducted by California, Colorado, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio, Texas and Washington. A joint Report of Examination (ROE) issued <strong>6 November 2023</strong> identified AML-program adequacy findings. Block&#x27;s approximately <strong>6 December 2023</strong> response described new and planned controls. The actual ROE and response are not attached in the retained copies. Block neither admits nor denies wrongdoing or violations (CSBS PDF1–2; Maine HTML recitals).</p>\n<p>CSBS&#x27;s release describes due-diligence, identity-verification, suspicious-activity reporting and high-risk-account requirements, and says regulators found noncompliance with certain requirements. Those explanatory categories must not be silently turned into an enumerated, proved list of specific Block failures: the public order refers to the underlying ROE without setting those particulars out. Likewise, the broad list of practices covered by the release in V.C is a release definition, not a separate finding that every listed practice failed.</p>\n<p>There are three different regulator groupings. The examination had the eight jurisdictions above; the public release credits seven enforcement leads (Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Florida, Maine, Texas and Washington); the initial <strong>Executive Committee has five</strong> (Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington). Do not merge these rosters into a single approval body.</p>\n<h2 id=\"operative-rights\">Operative rights</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Actor / relation suitable for the map</th>\n<th>Exact scope and locus</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Participating state regulators → Block: enforce order</td>\n<td>Jurisdiction under I and IV; each state retains enforcement/examination authority. Before enforcement under the agreement, the state gives the Executive Committee and Block written allegations and an opportunity to respond (IV.C, PDF7). This does not bind every other government agency.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>State Executive Committee → compliance process: receives and questions</td>\n<td>II.A and II.C.3, PDF2–3: receives consultant/company communications and can obtain all Board Reports. II.D.4/6, PDF5: simultaneous consultant reports to Block and committee; committee can obtain workpapers and other work product. IV.D, PDF7: participating regulators may obtain information held by committee/MMET.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Block → Compliance Management Committee: appointment</td>\n<td>II.B, PDF3: company representatives across relevant divisions, quarterly meetings/minutes. Continues until the later of receipt of validation report or eight quarters from effective date; only then may Block dissolve it at its discretion. No present dissolution or meeting record obtained.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Block board → compliance/CAP: ultimate oversight and formal approval</td>\n<td>II.C, PDF3; II.D.2, PDF4: board or authorized committee formally approves the Corrective Action Plan (CAP). CAP and updates are sent to the state committee. The text does not separately state that the state committee must formally approve each CAP.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Independent consultant → AML program: assessment/priority/validation</td>\n<td>II.D.1–3, PDF3–5: assess adequacy under applicable BSA requirements and 31 CFR 1022.210, prioritize corrective measures, validate completed measures and give progress reports. Block must provide relevant personnel, vendor, facility and record access (II.D.7, PDF5–6). This is review/validation authority, not proof of power to close individual customer accounts.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Block → replacement consultant: selection/engagement; state committee receives notice</td>\n<td>II.D.8, PDF6: notice of replacement need within ten days of awareness, notice of selection within ten days, engagement within thirty days of selection notice; qualified independent unaffiliated third party. No named consultant, initial selection procedure or express state appointment-veto provision was located in this operative text. Do not infer veto merely from the word independent.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>State Executive Committee → reporting deadlines: extension discretion</td>\n<td>II.D.9, PDF6: reasonable-ground request by Block, good-cause grant by committee. CAP duration extensions have a separate consultant-review mechanism in II.D.2(c), PDF5.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"clocks-and-money-states\">Clocks and money states</h2>\n<p>Effective date is <strong>15 January 2025</strong> (VI.A, PDF8). Assessment report: within <strong>nine months</strong> of that date, subject to reporting extensions. CAP submission: within <strong>90 calendar days after the assessment report is issued</strong>, with immediate implementation; consultant priority must be appropriately incorporated. CAP completion: <strong>12 months</strong>, with the consultant documenting the basis/need for an extension (II.D.2(c)). The CSBS release describes this as twelve months after report filing; the operative paragraph itself states the period without an equally explicit start phrase. Do not turn that summary into proof of an actual filing date or expired obligation.</p>\n<p>Other specified clocks include consultant progress reports at least quarterly and within ten days of request/quarter end; questions and responses have separate 20/15-day or 45/15-day periods. CAP completion triggers independent validation and a report; continued deficiencies trigger an updated CAP within 60 days of the validation report. Board progress reports are due within thirty days of each company committee meeting. No actual report, validation, extension or schedule performance is established here.</p>\n<p><strong>USD80,000,000 is the settlement obligation</strong>, composed of <strong>USD79,075,000 administrative penalty</strong> plus <strong>USD925,000 administrative costs</strong> (III.A, PDF6). Each payment clock is <strong>twenty calendar days after receipt of payment instructions</strong>, not simply twenty days after signing. Appendix C (Maine PDF22) allocates costs: Arkansas150,000; California250,000; Massachusetts150,000; Maine75,000; Texas150,000; Washington150,000. These are state administrative-cost allocations, not the consultant&#x27;s fees or consumer redress. Unpaid sums may be claimed against relevant surety bonds under III.B. The covered-conduct release depends on both effectiveness and full payment (V.D, PDF8). An obligation or release condition is not a payment receipt.</p>\n<h2 id=\"visible-4849-allocationversion-question\">Visible 48/49 allocation/version question</h2>\n<p>The 15 January announcement reports <strong>48 state regulators</strong>. Maine&#x27;s fuller copy visibly contains a <strong>Colorado signature dated 16 January 2025</strong> (PDF19), and Appendix A enumerates <strong>49 jurisdictions including DC</strong> (PDF20). Appendix B contains <strong>48 allocation rows</strong>, includes Colorado and omits Wyoming, although Wyoming appears in Appendix A and has a signature block in PDF17. Its stated penalty total remains USD79,075,000 (PDF21). Independent numerical review confirms that the48 listed values sum exactly to that total; the open question is the allocation basis for the differing party list, not an arithmetic shortfall. These are visible record differences, not OCR artifacts. The Maine HTML likewise includes Colorado and lacks a Wyoming penalty row.</p>\n<p>A later signature, publication assembly or allocation adjustment could explain parts of the difference. No corrected allocation schedule, alternative-payment election or reconciliation notice was obtained, so do not assert a particular explanation, missing money or that Wyoming was not a party. Preserve the total obligation as stated and leave per-state payment completeness unestablished.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-public-status-and-stopping-point\">Current public status and stopping point</h2>\n<p>The live Maine entry still presents its 16 January 2025 date, this agreement text and attached full copy. No linked completion certification, amendment, extension, consultant appointment or payment acknowledgment is displayed in the inspected entry. The CSBS release remains dated 15 January 2025. This narrow present inspection is not an exhaustive docket search and cannot establish current compliance or noncompliance. VI.C/I requires written changes by the parties (or other stated cessation conditions); VI.J creates no private enforcement right under this order. The agreement preserves Block&#x27;s later hearing/appeal rights in a compliance disagreement (recitals, PDF2).</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the executed consultant engagement/selection notice, assessment and validation reports, board-approved CAP with state receipt and any extensions, payment instructions/receipts and any corrected Appendix B. Block, the consultant and the state Executive Committee are the directly identified holders for the compliance records; the recipient regulators hold payment records. The unreleased ROE is the record needed to specify original deficiencies. Their absence from this packet is not evidence that none exist or that the required work was not performed. No subsequent branch is opened pending the forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09/state-controls.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w23-cash-s-state-body",
          "w23-cash-s-state-full",
          "w23-cash-s-state-page",
          "w23-cash-s-state-release"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded regulator lane, observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed after the original operative text, one fuller official copy, its current state landing page and the coordinator's explanatory release. No outreach, paid/private access, additional state case or NYDFS acquisition. Root's Block disclosures and the separate CFPB lane are not incorporated here.\n\n## Result\n\nThis is an actual consent order binding Block, Inc., rather than a voluntary industry recommendation. It establishes a state-to-company oversight mechanism: state Executive Committee receives reports/workpapers and can question the consultant; Block's board approves corrective plans and carries ultimate compliance responsibility; an independent consultant assesses and validates the work. The public instrument does not reveal the consultant's identity, executed engagement, specific implemented controls, payment receipts or completed remediation. It establishes no Lantern causal link and no bank-owner instruction.\n\n## Sources, versions and scoped reading\n\nThe CSBS announcement (see source references) dated **15 January 2025**, links a 10-page order body (see source references) That PDF ends by saying signature pages follow, but contains no signature pages or appendices. It is retained as `state-csbs-order-body.pdf`; its operative pages 1–10 were read, with emphasis on recitals, II governance, III payment, IV enforcement, V release and VI duration/private rights.\n\nThe Maine enforcement entry (see source references) dated **16 January 2025**, reproduces the order and links a 22-page fuller official copy (see source references) retained as `state-maine-order-full.pdf`. Maine's HTML operative sections and signature/appendix text were read; the PDF's signatures/appendices were extracted, and PDF pages **11, 19, 20 and 21** were rendered locally and visually inspected. The text layer of PDF11 is empty although the signed page is visible. Maine's HTML is a derivative presentation of the same instrument, not independent corroboration; use the PDF for signature/table ambiguities. The different copies are not represented as byte-identical.\n\nOriginals, URLs, retrieval timestamps, hashes, reading scopes and derivative ancestry are in `captures-state.json`. All four public GETs succeeded. The web screenshot route returned cache-miss errors; the already retained PDF was rendered locally with pypdfium2 instead, without another network attempt.\n\n## Parties, examination and allegation boundaries\n\nThe order names **Block, Inc., formerly Square, Inc., NMLS 942933**, as the company operating Cash App. The other parties are participating states' money-transmission regulatory agencies. CSBS and MTRA supply coordination protocols, and the states work through the Multi-State MSB Examination Taskforce (MMET); they are not additional company respondents or substituted state enforcement authorities. Jack Dorsey signs for Block as Block Head and Chairperson (Maine PDF11), not as a separately named personal respondent.\n\nThe recitals describe an examination begun around **15 May 2023**, covering **1 January 2021–31 March 2023**, conducted by California, Colorado, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio, Texas and Washington. A joint Report of Examination (ROE) issued **6 November 2023** identified AML-program adequacy findings. Block's approximately **6 December 2023** response described new and planned controls. The actual ROE and response are not attached in the retained copies. Block neither admits nor denies wrongdoing or violations (CSBS PDF1–2; Maine HTML recitals).\n\nCSBS's release describes due-diligence, identity-verification, suspicious-activity reporting and high-risk-account requirements, and says regulators found noncompliance with certain requirements. Those explanatory categories must not be silently turned into an enumerated, proved list of specific Block failures: the public order refers to the underlying ROE without setting those particulars out. Likewise, the broad list of practices covered by the release in V.C is a release definition, not a separate finding that every listed practice failed.\n\nThere are three different regulator groupings. The examination had the eight jurisdictions above; the public release credits seven enforcement leads (Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Florida, Maine, Texas and Washington); the initial **Executive Committee has five** (Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Texas and Washington). Do not merge these rosters into a single approval body.\n\n## Operative rights\n\n| Actor / relation suitable for the map | Exact scope and locus |\n| --- | --- |\n| Participating state regulators → Block: enforce order | Jurisdiction under I and IV; each state retains enforcement/examination authority. Before enforcement under the agreement, the state gives the Executive Committee and Block written allegations and an opportunity to respond (IV.C, PDF7). This does not bind every other government agency. |\n| State Executive Committee → compliance process: receives and questions | II.A and II.C.3, PDF2–3: receives consultant/company communications and can obtain all Board Reports. II.D.4/6, PDF5: simultaneous consultant reports to Block and committee; committee can obtain workpapers and other work product. IV.D, PDF7: participating regulators may obtain information held by committee/MMET. |\n| Block → Compliance Management Committee: appointment | II.B, PDF3: company representatives across relevant divisions, quarterly meetings/minutes. Continues until the later of receipt of validation report or eight quarters from effective date; only then may Block dissolve it at its discretion. No present dissolution or meeting record obtained. |\n| Block board → compliance/CAP: ultimate oversight and formal approval | II.C, PDF3; II.D.2, PDF4: board or authorized committee formally approves the Corrective Action Plan (CAP). CAP and updates are sent to the state committee. The text does not separately state that the state committee must formally approve each CAP. |\n| Independent consultant → AML program: assessment/priority/validation | II.D.1–3, PDF3–5: assess adequacy under applicable BSA requirements and 31 CFR 1022.210, prioritize corrective measures, validate completed measures and give progress reports. Block must provide relevant personnel, vendor, facility and record access (II.D.7, PDF5–6). This is review/validation authority, not proof of power to close individual customer accounts. |\n| Block → replacement consultant: selection/engagement; state committee receives notice | II.D.8, PDF6: notice of replacement need within ten days of awareness, notice of selection within ten days, engagement within thirty days of selection notice; qualified independent unaffiliated third party. No named consultant, initial selection procedure or express state appointment-veto provision was located in this operative text. Do not infer veto merely from the word independent. |\n| State Executive Committee → reporting deadlines: extension discretion | II.D.9, PDF6: reasonable-ground request by Block, good-cause grant by committee. CAP duration extensions have a separate consultant-review mechanism in II.D.2(c), PDF5. |\n\n## Clocks and money states\n\nEffective date is **15 January 2025** (VI.A, PDF8). Assessment report: within **nine months** of that date, subject to reporting extensions. CAP submission: within **90 calendar days after the assessment report is issued**, with immediate implementation; consultant priority must be appropriately incorporated. CAP completion: **12 months**, with the consultant documenting the basis/need for an extension (II.D.2(c)). The CSBS release describes this as twelve months after report filing; the operative paragraph itself states the period without an equally explicit start phrase. Do not turn that summary into proof of an actual filing date or expired obligation.\n\nOther specified clocks include consultant progress reports at least quarterly and within ten days of request/quarter end; questions and responses have separate 20/15-day or 45/15-day periods. CAP completion triggers independent validation and a report; continued deficiencies trigger an updated CAP within 60 days of the validation report. Board progress reports are due within thirty days of each company committee meeting. No actual report, validation, extension or schedule performance is established here.\n\n**USD80,000,000 is the settlement obligation**, composed of **USD79,075,000 administrative penalty** plus **USD925,000 administrative costs** (III.A, PDF6). Each payment clock is **twenty calendar days after receipt of payment instructions**, not simply twenty days after signing. Appendix C (Maine PDF22) allocates costs: Arkansas150,000; California250,000; Massachusetts150,000; Maine75,000; Texas150,000; Washington150,000. These are state administrative-cost allocations, not the consultant's fees or consumer redress. Unpaid sums may be claimed against relevant surety bonds under III.B. The covered-conduct release depends on both effectiveness and full payment (V.D, PDF8). An obligation or release condition is not a payment receipt.\n\n## Visible 48/49 allocation/version question\n\nThe 15 January announcement reports **48 state regulators**. Maine's fuller copy visibly contains a **Colorado signature dated 16 January 2025** (PDF19), and Appendix A enumerates **49 jurisdictions including DC** (PDF20). Appendix B contains **48 allocation rows**, includes Colorado and omits Wyoming, although Wyoming appears in Appendix A and has a signature block in PDF17. Its stated penalty total remains USD79,075,000 (PDF21). Independent numerical review confirms that the48 listed values sum exactly to that total; the open question is the allocation basis for the differing party list, not an arithmetic shortfall. These are visible record differences, not OCR artifacts. The Maine HTML likewise includes Colorado and lacks a Wyoming penalty row.\n\nA later signature, publication assembly or allocation adjustment could explain parts of the difference. No corrected allocation schedule, alternative-payment election or reconciliation notice was obtained, so do not assert a particular explanation, missing money or that Wyoming was not a party. Preserve the total obligation as stated and leave per-state payment completeness unestablished.\n\n## Current public status and stopping point\n\nThe live Maine entry still presents its 16 January 2025 date, this agreement text and attached full copy. No linked completion certification, amendment, extension, consultant appointment or payment acknowledgment is displayed in the inspected entry. The CSBS release remains dated 15 January 2025. This narrow present inspection is not an exhaustive docket search and cannot establish current compliance or noncompliance. VI.C/I requires written changes by the parties (or other stated cessation conditions); VI.J creates no private enforcement right under this order. The agreement preserves Block's later hearing/appeal rights in a compliance disagreement (recitals, PDF2).\n\nThe next discriminating records are the executed consultant engagement/selection notice, assessment and validation reports, board-approved CAP with state receipt and any extensions, payment instructions/receipts and any corrected Appendix B. Block, the consultant and the state Executive Committee are the directly identified holders for the compliance records; the recipient regulators hold payment records. The unreleased ROE is the record needed to specify original deficiencies. Their absence from this packet is not evidence that none exist or that the required work was not performed. No subsequent branch is opened pending the forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-state-controls.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process",
        "title": "Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money",
        "description": "Root acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. This lane examines published institutional design and advisory rules, not a claim that any participant controls the others. Government transition and actual Foundation constitution belong to the parallel packets.",
        "html": "<p>Root acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. This lane examines published institutional design and advisory rules, not a claim that any participant controls the others. Government transition and actual Foundation constitution belong to the parallel packets.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2023-proposal-independent-capacity-continuing-direction\">2023 proposal: independent capacity, continuing direction</h2>\n<p>[Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call](http[local research file] 2023 Summit meeting paper: root read the complete main text, PDF pages 3–8; contents/cover and annex text also inspected. Annex geometry was not visually verified because screenshot retrieval failed. Reader access succeeded; original GET returned a 404 HTML page, retained as an error response.</p>\n<p>The proposed change addressed limitations of a secretariat embedded in France and New Zealand: public-finance requirements complicated outside funding, global hiring and secondments. A separate legal entity would receive wider support and employ staff. The proposal divided corporate/financial oversight by a board from work-programme direction by Call Leaders; founding documents would determine appointments while preserving the founders&#x27; leadership. It also considered applying the model to related digital issues in the context of terrorist and violent extremist content. These were proposed arrangements, not the acquired constitution or proof that donor money purchased policy authority.</p>\n<h2 id=\"entry-to-the-wider-call\">Entry to the wider Call</h2>\n<p>[Join the Call](http[local research file] root read the full substantive page, reader lines 14–53. It describes introductory engagement, written intent, an information response cleared by the applicant, confidential circulation and a community discussion, followed by a final decision by Call Leaders and a coordinated announcement. Leaders are described broadly: government, corporate, civil-society and partner-organisation leaders. The page does not disclose an electorate, quorum, voting formula, veto or rejection-appeal rule. The Secretariat convenes; participation alone is not final approval authority. Undated legacy-site reader snapshot; copyright 2026 is not a rule-adoption date. Ordinary GET returned 403, so current operation has not been independently confirmed.</p>\n<p>[Current priorities page](http[local research file] attributes work to Call commitments and community-leader direction. Indexed substantive body read; direct reader failed and GET returned 403. This supports stated directional continuity, not an exact decision procedure.</p>\n<h2 id=\"ccan-has-its-own-rules-and-financial-intermediary\">CCAN has its own rules and financial intermediary</h2>\n<p>[CCAN Terms of Reference](http[local research file] root read all 15 pages through the primary reader. Footer says last updated December 2025; the metadata title mentions 2026 and is not an adoption date. [Governance index](http[local research file] links these terms. Both original GETs returned 406, retained as errors.</p>\n<p>Sections 3–7 put admissions, statements and internal decisions with a Core Committee of at most 25. It elects co-chairs. Modified consensus permits at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; a deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Internal meetings ordinarily exclude Foundation staff. Section 8 requests consultation and explanations for rejected feedback, not a general Foundation-policy veto. Section 9 reports Foundation funding; operational funds are held by a member organisation under an agreed memorandum. The Committee approves applications and fund-use rules. Section 10 provides Foundation review/feedback on amended terms, without an express approval veto. Section 3 requires government/company-funding disclosures above its threshold but keeps them within eligibility review. These rules create specific independence safeguards alongside dependence; actual compliance, funding amounts, fundholder identity and signed memorandum remain unverified.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-foundation-self-description-and-limits\">Current Foundation self-description and limits</h2>\n<p>[Foundation page](http[local research file] root read the full indexed substantive body. It describes convening and programme delivery, names Paul Ash as CEO, Andy George as deputy and Kristen Cambell as chief partnerships officer, and distinguishes patron/founder roles. Those are not a verified trustee roster or appointment instrument. Reader cache miss and one GET403 closed the original route.</p>\n<p>[Funding page](http[local research file] root read indexed substantive body. It separates financial, ideas, delivery and community partnerships and asserts independence principles. It acknowledges Pivotal support via the Pivotal Leaders Fund, claims NGOsource equivalency determination and a European donation partner, but the available text omits funder-logo identities and the partner&#x27;s name. No determination instrument, donation agreement or full linked principles was acquired. GET403 and reader failure closed this route.</p>\n<h2 id=\"inference-and-next-evidence\">Inference and next evidence</h2>\n<p>The strongest supported structure is several interacting authorities: community leaders select priorities and entrants under published descriptions; a separate nonprofit supplies capacity; an advisory committee controls its own participation and speech while relying on financing and a fundholder. This is more precise than treating a supporter list as a board or a funding logo as an instruction right.</p>\n<p>The governing Foundation deed, trustee appointments, funded-programme terms and CCAN fundholder memorandum are the most revealing missing instruments. Public rules make the latter a reasonable document-existence expectation, not proof of an executed agreement. No new branch is opened before the combined forest.</p>\n<p>Original-content acquisition failed for every root URL; root-captures.json retains statuses, hashes and filenames of error responses. These are not original article/PDF bytes. Source reading is primary reader/index text only. No contacts, forms, accounts, grants or donations submitted.</p>",
        "path": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09/decision-process.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-proposal2023",
          "w27-roost-s-join-call",
          "w27-roost-s-ccan-tor",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-foundation",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-funding",
          "w27-roost-s-call-priorities"
        ],
        "markdown": "Root acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. This lane examines published institutional design and advisory rules, not a claim that any participant controls the others. Government transition and actual Foundation constitution belong to the parallel packets.\n\n## 2023 proposal: independent capacity, continuing direction\n\nNext steps for a resilient Christchurch Call (see source references) 2023 Summit meeting paper: root read the complete main text, PDF pages 3–8; contents/cover and annex text also inspected. Annex geometry was not visually verified because screenshot retrieval failed. Reader access succeeded; original GET returned a 404 HTML page, retained as an error response.\n\nThe proposed change addressed limitations of a secretariat embedded in France and New Zealand: public-finance requirements complicated outside funding, global hiring and secondments. A separate legal entity would receive wider support and employ staff. The proposal divided corporate/financial oversight by a board from work-programme direction by Call Leaders; founding documents would determine appointments while preserving the founders' leadership. It also considered applying the model to related digital issues in the context of terrorist and violent extremist content. These were proposed arrangements, not the acquired constitution or proof that donor money purchased policy authority.\n\n## Entry to the wider Call\n\nJoin the Call (see source references) root read the full substantive page, reader lines 14–53. It describes introductory engagement, written intent, an information response cleared by the applicant, confidential circulation and a community discussion, followed by a final decision by Call Leaders and a coordinated announcement. Leaders are described broadly: government, corporate, civil-society and partner-organisation leaders. The page does not disclose an electorate, quorum, voting formula, veto or rejection-appeal rule. The Secretariat convenes; participation alone is not final approval authority. Undated legacy-site reader snapshot; copyright 2026 is not a rule-adoption date. Ordinary GET returned 403, so current operation has not been independently confirmed.\n\nCurrent priorities page (see source references) attributes work to Call commitments and community-leader direction. Indexed substantive body read; direct reader failed and GET returned 403. This supports stated directional continuity, not an exact decision procedure.\n\n## CCAN has its own rules and financial intermediary\n\nCCAN Terms of Reference (see source references) root read all 15 pages through the primary reader. Footer says last updated December 2025; the metadata title mentions 2026 and is not an adoption date. Governance index (see source references) links these terms. Both original GETs returned 406, retained as errors.\n\nSections 3–7 put admissions, statements and internal decisions with a Core Committee of at most 25. It elects co-chairs. Modified consensus permits at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; a deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Internal meetings ordinarily exclude Foundation staff. Section 8 requests consultation and explanations for rejected feedback, not a general Foundation-policy veto. Section 9 reports Foundation funding; operational funds are held by a member organisation under an agreed memorandum. The Committee approves applications and fund-use rules. Section 10 provides Foundation review/feedback on amended terms, without an express approval veto. Section 3 requires government/company-funding disclosures above its threshold but keeps them within eligibility review. These rules create specific independence safeguards alongside dependence; actual compliance, funding amounts, fundholder identity and signed memorandum remain unverified.\n\n## Current Foundation self-description and limits\n\nFoundation page (see source references) root read the full indexed substantive body. It describes convening and programme delivery, names Paul Ash as CEO, Andy George as deputy and Kristen Cambell as chief partnerships officer, and distinguishes patron/founder roles. Those are not a verified trustee roster or appointment instrument. Reader cache miss and one GET403 closed the original route.\n\nFunding page (see source references) root read indexed substantive body. It separates financial, ideas, delivery and community partnerships and asserts independence principles. It acknowledges Pivotal support via the Pivotal Leaders Fund, claims NGOsource equivalency determination and a European donation partner, but the available text omits funder-logo identities and the partner's name. No determination instrument, donation agreement or full linked principles was acquired. GET403 and reader failure closed this route.\n\n## Inference and next evidence\n\nThe strongest supported structure is several interacting authorities: community leaders select priorities and entrants under published descriptions; a separate nonprofit supplies capacity; an advisory committee controls its own participation and speech while relying on financing and a fundholder. This is more precise than treating a supporter list as a board or a funding logo as an instruction right.\n\nThe governing Foundation deed, trustee appointments, funded-programme terms and CCAN fundholder memorandum are the most revealing missing instruments. Public rules make the latter a reasonable document-existence expectation, not proof of an executed agreement. No new branch is opened before the combined forest.\n\nOriginal-content acquisition failed for every root URL; root-captures.json retains statuses, hashes and filenames of error responses. These are not original article/PDF bytes. Source reading is primary reader/index text only. No contacts, forms, accounts, grants or donations submitted.\n",
        "file": "research/christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-decision-process.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-legal-governance",
        "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation — legal governance",
        "description": "Observed and acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This lane distinguishes a constituted support organisation from the wider voluntary Call. It found a primary transition announcement and a detailed proposed division of responsibilities, but did not acquire the foundation's adopted deed/constitution or a verified board register. It therefore does not establis",
        "html": "<p>Observed and acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This lane distinguishes a constituted support organisation from the wider voluntary Call. It found a primary transition announcement and a detailed <strong>proposed</strong> division of responsibilities, but did not acquire the foundation&#x27;s adopted deed/constitution or a verified board register. It therefore does not establish actual appointment quotas, voting rights, quorum, vetoes, delegation limits or amendment powers.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-primary-records-establish\">What the primary records establish</h2>\n<p>The [joint French–New Zealand announcement of 14 May 2024](http[local research file] announces a new non-governmental organisation to coordinate the Call&#x27;s work. It ties the change to the November 2023 Leaders&#x27; Summit, places headquarters in Wellington and schedules Secretariat operation under the foundation from 1 July 2024. It describes key decisions about direction as remaining with Leaders from all sectors. The announcement says funding pledges had been attracted; it does not disclose donor voting rights or certify receipt. Ardern&#x27;s stated Patron role is voluntary/unpaid dialogue, outreach and advocacy, rather than an identified trustee appointment. These are announced institutional arrangements, not the signed governing instrument.</p>\n<p>Read scope: complete substantive announcement and Notes from Linnaeus&#x27;s retained original <code>transition-launch-france.html</code>, excluding unrelated current-news cards. SHA-256 <code>8b5a17c3a57b171a33640c6a9aaa35edb1be3eb4dddc57c1d9d8e58e02881c43</code>. Original custody remains shared in this wave; it was read locally rather than downloaded again. The NZ mirror&#x27;s HTTP 200 response was a tiny non-substantive response and was not used as an original body.</p>\n<p>The [2023 meeting paper, <em>Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call</em>](http[local research file] <strong>PDF5/printed3</strong>, is explicitly an initial proposal. It envisages an independent public-good entity, potentially a trust or nonprofit. A future founding document would define board remit and appointments while maintaining French/New Zealand leadership. The board would supervise corporate/financial functions and performance aligned with Leaders&#x27; policy directions; the Call work programme would remain with Leaders. It also says the existing Call community has no corporate/legal structure. This is a proposed separation between entity governance and initiative direction, not proof those precise clauses were adopted. Main text PDF3–8 was read through the public reader; the Annex A diagram was available as extracted labels only and was not visually verified. The June 2024 URL folder is not a deed adoption date. Root&#x27;s failed original GET is already closed; no original PDF hash is claimed.</p>\n<p>The current [foundation page](http[local research file] read as indexed primary text, identifies Paul Ash as Chief Executive, Andy George as Deputy Chief Executive and Kristen Cambell as Chief Partnerships Officer. It describes Ardern and Macron as providing strategic guidance and global advocacy under its patrons heading. Their individual labels differ: Ardern is explicitly foundation Patron; Macron&#x27;s individual label is Call Co-Founder. The text separates community participation, Call commitments and foundation delivery. None of these titles alone establishes a trustee/director seat, appointment power, legal veto or control over participant governments/platforms. The indexed body was read through its leadership/programme introduction; the ordinary original GET was a challenge response, not substantive HTML. No original-body hash is claimed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"registry-and-adopted-rule-gap\">Registry and adopted-rule gap</h2>\n<p>The exact name/identifier lead is <strong>The Christchurch Call Foundation, CC62350</strong>. [CharityData NZ](http[local research file] supplies that pointer and describes a trust registered 27 May 2024. In this lane those legal-form/date fields remain <strong>secondary and unverified against the official entity row</strong>. Its automated rating, financial dashboard and abbreviated officer list are not evidence of board composition or control. In particular, a CEO and Patron appearing as officers would not by itself make them the only trustees.</p>\n<p>The public [Charities Register](http[local research file] explains that registered-charity information can be searched publicly. The aggregator&#x27;s direct link to <code>ViewCharity?accountId=CC62350</code> produced a reader cache miss; ordinary GET of that link and of the official search page both returned HTTP 403. That link&#x27;s use of CC62350 as accountId was not independently validated. These failures do not establish absence of a registration or deed.</p>\n<p>Charities Services separately publishes an [open-data interface for research](http[local research file] Its reader-visible documentation permits filtered Organisation queries and names CharityRegistrationNumber as a field. One unauthenticated query for CC62350 through the documented OData host also returned HTTP 403. No account, browser challenge, alternate-host workaround or access-control bypass was attempted. The register and OData routes are closed for this run. The documentation explains public access possibilities; it does not supply the missing entity record.</p>\n<p>No adopted trust deed, constitution, board appointment instrument, current complete trustee roster, delegation instrument, reserved-matters schedule or donor agreement was obtained. Searches for the foundation name with deed, constitution, trustees, board and governing-document terms supplied no such primary instrument within this pass. The July 2024 essay proposing community participation in board appointments was treated as advocacy, not as an adopted rule. Similarly, the 2023 plan does not prove that donors elect trustees, that France/New Zealand presently have reserved seats, or that foundation trustees can compel a participating platform&#x27;s moderation decision.</p>\n<h2 id=\"exact-next-record\">Exact next record</h2>\n<p>The next discriminator is the foundation&#x27;s <strong>adopted governing document and amendments</strong>, paired with the <strong>current trustee/board appointment record</strong>. Charities Services or the foundation is the likely custodian. Those records would resolve appointment/removal rights, financial approvals, conflicts, delegations and any formal relationship to Call Leaders or funders. A funding receipt alone would not answer those questions.</p>\n<p><code>legal-captures.json</code> preserves the failed response bytes, their hashes and precise status; it also identifies the shared successful French original and the reader/index-only scopes. Error-response hashes are not hashes of a deed, registration row or foundation webpage body. Acquisition stops at this documented gap for the parent&#x27;s forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09/legal-governance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-register-attempt",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-odata-attempt"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed and acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This lane distinguishes a constituted support organisation from the wider voluntary Call. It found a primary transition announcement and a detailed **proposed** division of responsibilities, but did not acquire the foundation's adopted deed/constitution or a verified board register. It therefore does not establish actual appointment quotas, voting rights, quorum, vetoes, delegation limits or amendment powers.\n\n## What the primary records establish\n\nThe joint French–New Zealand announcement of 14 May 2024 (see source references) announces a new non-governmental organisation to coordinate the Call's work. It ties the change to the November 2023 Leaders' Summit, places headquarters in Wellington and schedules Secretariat operation under the foundation from 1 July 2024. It describes key decisions about direction as remaining with Leaders from all sectors. The announcement says funding pledges had been attracted; it does not disclose donor voting rights or certify receipt. Ardern's stated Patron role is voluntary/unpaid dialogue, outreach and advocacy, rather than an identified trustee appointment. These are announced institutional arrangements, not the signed governing instrument.\n\nRead scope: complete substantive announcement and Notes from Linnaeus's retained original `transition-launch-france.html`, excluding unrelated current-news cards. SHA-256 `8b5a17c3a57b171a33640c6a9aaa35edb1be3eb4dddc57c1d9d8e58e02881c43`. Original custody remains shared in this wave; it was read locally rather than downloaded again. The NZ mirror's HTTP 200 response was a tiny non-substantive response and was not used as an original body.\n\nThe 2023 meeting paper, *Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call* (see source references) **PDF5/printed3**, is explicitly an initial proposal. It envisages an independent public-good entity, potentially a trust or nonprofit. A future founding document would define board remit and appointments while maintaining French/New Zealand leadership. The board would supervise corporate/financial functions and performance aligned with Leaders' policy directions; the Call work programme would remain with Leaders. It also says the existing Call community has no corporate/legal structure. This is a proposed separation between entity governance and initiative direction, not proof those precise clauses were adopted. Main text PDF3–8 was read through the public reader; the Annex A diagram was available as extracted labels only and was not visually verified. The June 2024 URL folder is not a deed adoption date. Root's failed original GET is already closed; no original PDF hash is claimed.\n\nThe current foundation page (see source references) read as indexed primary text, identifies Paul Ash as Chief Executive, Andy George as Deputy Chief Executive and Kristen Cambell as Chief Partnerships Officer. It describes Ardern and Macron as providing strategic guidance and global advocacy under its patrons heading. Their individual labels differ: Ardern is explicitly foundation Patron; Macron's individual label is Call Co-Founder. The text separates community participation, Call commitments and foundation delivery. None of these titles alone establishes a trustee/director seat, appointment power, legal veto or control over participant governments/platforms. The indexed body was read through its leadership/programme introduction; the ordinary original GET was a challenge response, not substantive HTML. No original-body hash is claimed.\n\n## Registry and adopted-rule gap\n\nThe exact name/identifier lead is **The Christchurch Call Foundation, CC62350**. CharityData NZ (see source references) supplies that pointer and describes a trust registered 27 May 2024. In this lane those legal-form/date fields remain **secondary and unverified against the official entity row**. Its automated rating, financial dashboard and abbreviated officer list are not evidence of board composition or control. In particular, a CEO and Patron appearing as officers would not by itself make them the only trustees.\n\nThe public Charities Register (see source references) explains that registered-charity information can be searched publicly. The aggregator's direct link to `ViewCharity?accountId=CC62350` produced a reader cache miss; ordinary GET of that link and of the official search page both returned HTTP 403. That link's use of CC62350 as accountId was not independently validated. These failures do not establish absence of a registration or deed.\n\nCharities Services separately publishes an open-data interface for research (see source references) Its reader-visible documentation permits filtered Organisation queries and names CharityRegistrationNumber as a field. One unauthenticated query for CC62350 through the documented OData host also returned HTTP 403. No account, browser challenge, alternate-host workaround or access-control bypass was attempted. The register and OData routes are closed for this run. The documentation explains public access possibilities; it does not supply the missing entity record.\n\nNo adopted trust deed, constitution, board appointment instrument, current complete trustee roster, delegation instrument, reserved-matters schedule or donor agreement was obtained. Searches for the foundation name with deed, constitution, trustees, board and governing-document terms supplied no such primary instrument within this pass. The July 2024 essay proposing community participation in board appointments was treated as advocacy, not as an adopted rule. Similarly, the 2023 plan does not prove that donors elect trustees, that France/New Zealand presently have reserved seats, or that foundation trustees can compel a participating platform's moderation decision.\n\n## Exact next record\n\nThe next discriminator is the foundation's **adopted governing document and amendments**, paired with the **current trustee/board appointment record**. Charities Services or the foundation is the likely custodian. Those records would resolve appointment/removal rights, financial approvals, conflicts, delegations and any formal relationship to Call Leaders or funders. A funding receipt alone would not answer those questions.\n\n`legal-captures.json` preserves the failed response bytes, their hashes and precise status; it also identifies the shared successful French original and the reader/index-only scopes. Error-response hashes are not hashes of a deed, registration row or foundation webpage body. Acquisition stops at this documented gap for the parent's forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-legal-governance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding",
        "title": "Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded transition/funding acquisition closed. This note separates the 2024 support-function handoff, the continuing Call, the new Foundation, and later project funding. Legal-entity governance and community decision processes belong to the parallel lanes. No outreach, account, payment or private record access; no canonical changes.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded transition/funding acquisition closed. This note separates the 2024 support-function handoff, the continuing Call, the new Foundation, and later project funding. Legal-entity governance and community decision processes belong to the parallel lanes. No outreach, account, payment or private record access; no canonical changes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-handoff-actually-establishes\">What the handoff actually establishes</h2>\n<p>The <strong>14 May 2024 joint NZ/France announcement</strong> says support functions would move to a new secretariat funded by the Foundation, operating from <strong>1 July 2024</strong>, while New Zealand taxpayer funding for the Call would end on <strong>30 June</strong>. Donor pledges had been attracted, but no amounts or received instalments are stated. The Foundation would coordinate and support the wider community; leaders from all sectors would continue making key directional decisions. Ardern&#x27;s special-envoy term would end, with her continuing as unpaid patron for dialogue and advocacy. The announcement does not assign her a foundation voting or appointment power.</p>\n<p>[Joint official statement, French presidency publication](http[local research file] Complete substantive body and notes read. The NZ publication is the same joint-source family, not independent corroboration; its ordinary GET returned a challenge shell and was closed.</p>\n<p><strong>MFAT subsequently reports the transition as completed</strong>, with New Zealand government funding ending in June 2024 and support functions financed by community/philanthropic pledges. This is a retrospective departmental performance account, not proof that every pledge had been paid. [MFAT Annual Report 2023–24](http[local research file] <strong>PDF66/printed66</strong>, complete Outcome1 paragraph context read. The report&#x27;s publication date was not separately established; its reporting period is distinct from the September2026 retrieval.</p>\n<p>The defensible change is government-funded coordination becoming Foundation-funded coordination, while governments remain in the wider initiative. These documents do not prove full NZ or French withdrawal, French funding termination, or an absence of continued diplomatic/in-kind work. No signed handover deed, staff secondment/novation schedule, asset inventory, IP assignment, transferred bank balance or government reserved appointment/approval instrument was acquired. Moving support functions does not by itself establish a transfer of ownership of assets or employment contracts.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-government-baseline-is-operating-expenditure-not-foundation-capitalization\">The government baseline is operating expenditure, not foundation capitalization</h2>\n<p>[MFAT OIA29223, dated4April2024](http[local research file] both pages read; AppendixA onPDF2 visually inspected. The response identifies costs incurred <strong>by MFAT only</strong>, in <strong>NZD</strong>, from1July2018 through29February2024.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Financial year</th>\n<th>Reported actual expenditure NZD</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>2018/19</td>\n<td>87,936</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2019/20</td>\n<td>530,486</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2020/21</td>\n<td>856,130</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2021/22</td>\n<td>357,172</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2022/23</td>\n<td>638,646</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2023/24 YTD to29February2024</td>\n<td>412,853</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The last year is incomplete and subject to later review. These are not the Call&#x27;s complete costs across all departments/countries, not a Foundation grant, and not payment vouchers. No cumulative influence budget is constructed. The response was listed for publication on31May2024 in MFAT&#x27;s2024 OIA index; the letter itself is4April.</p>\n<h2 id=\"actual-named-donor-support-after-the-restructuring\">Actual named donor support after the restructuring</h2>\n<p>[Packard&#x27;s CCF grant card](http[local research file] records <strong>2024</strong>, <strong>$350,000</strong>, <strong>Term36</strong>, for <strong>general support</strong>, in Just Societies / Democracy, Rights and Governance. Complete substantive card read and original retained. The card does not explicitly state the term&#x27;s unit or currency, exact award/payment dates, expenditure allocation or donor appointment/clearance rights. Preserve its displayed fields; do not turn the likely36-month term into verified wording without a further source. The US donor&#x27;s dollar context is consistent with USD, but the currency is not separately printed in this card.</p>\n<p>Carnegie&#x27;s [grant database, page13](http[local research file] records <strong>12December2024</strong>, <strong>$500,000</strong>, <strong>12months</strong>, Special Opportunities Fund, to support CCF&#x27;s launch. The full CCF entry was read through the primary public reader, lines152–194; ordinary GET403 was retained only as an error response and the route closed. The description emphasizes launch as an independent body but dates the spin-out to2023. That donor characterization does not override the joint governments&#x27; July2024 operational handoff. The discrepancy could reflect preparation versus operation, or imprecise donor wording; this pass does not resolve it.</p>\n<p>Carnegie&#x27;s [10March2026 board-grants announcement](http[local research file] says its trustees approved grants at the <strong>5March2026</strong> meeting, including <strong>$2,000,000 over24months</strong> for CCF to counter terrorist/violent-extremist content online. Read title/date, approval introduction and CCF entry through the primary reader, lines30–34 and67–68. This earns <strong>donor board approval</strong>, not payment or a right to run Foundation decisions. Original GET403 was closed and retained as error only. Dollar amounts are displayed by a US donor; the brief entry does not separately label currency.</p>\n<p>The two Carnegie records are distinct dated grants; do not treat the second as an amendment or sum them with Packard/Canada into current annual resources. None supplies cash receipt, remaining balance, renewal conditions, reporting schedule, a content veto or a named trustee&#x27;s individual grant decision. The wider donor-list/funding-principles inquiry is a parallel lane, not silently supplied by these grant cards.</p>\n<h2 id=\"later-public-project-funding-survives-the-nz-support-function-exit\">Later public project funding survives the NZ support-function exit</h2>\n<p>[Public Safety Canada contribution26007](http[local research file] reference088-2025-2026-Q3-00044. The complete original detail record identifies legal recipient <strong>The Christchurch Call Foundation</strong>, agreement value <strong>CAD1,369,064</strong>, term <strong>23October2025–31March2028</strong>, under the Community Resilience Fund.</p>\n<p>Its expected results are three workstreams: piloting interventions for TVEC risks in new technology sectors; partnering with <strong>ROOST</strong> to support open-source safety tools, particularly for smaller companies; and using the multistakeholder community to encourage uptake of the resulting interventions/tools/practices. These are <strong>funded project purposes and expected results</strong>, not proof the outputs have been delivered or accepted. The disclosure does not allocate the award among workstreams or specify a payment/approval schedule.</p>\n<p>This directly distinguishes ended NZ secretariat funding from later Canadian project support to the Foundation. It is neither a Canadian payment to TAT nor CCIAO financing. The legal-recipient record supports the Foundation bridge without assigning Canada operational authority over ROOST or a particular classification. It does not establish a government appointment or policy-veto right.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-structure-and-unresolved-decision-rights\">Candidate structure and unresolved decision rights</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From → to</th>\n<th>Relation and state</th>\n<th>Supported boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>NZ/France-led support functions → Foundation secretariat</td>\n<td>Announced14May2024 for1July; later MFAT-reported completed transition</td>\n<td>Function handoff; staff/assets/IP transfer terms not acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NZ government → prior Call support funding</td>\n<td>Announced end30June2024; MFAT retrospective confirmation</td>\n<td>Not full governmental withdrawal or a French funding-stop record.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Packard → CCF</td>\n<td>2024 general-support donor grant record</td>\n<td>Amount/Term as displayed; payment and governance rights unknown.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Carnegie → CCF launch</td>\n<td>12December2024 grant,$500000,12months</td>\n<td>Launch support; donor2023spin-out characterization not authoritative handoff date.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Carnegie trustees → CCF support grant</td>\n<td>5March2026 donor board approval,$2m,24months</td>\n<td>Approval is distinct from disbursement and recipient governance.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Public Safety Canada → CCF agreement26007 → three expected workstreams</td>\n<td>Disclosed contribution,2025–28,includingROOSTtool partnership</td>\n<td>No payment, completed delivery, acceptance, suballocation or content mandate established.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The high-value missing instrument is the actual2024 transition/handover agreement and schedules, joined to the Foundation&#x27;s constituent instrument and any donor agreements that reserve rights. That could identify employer changes, assigned assets, retained governmental seats, approvals, obligations and termination remedies. Financial statements or grant-payment records would separately distinguish pledges/awards from receipts. No such document was requested from a person or private portal.</p>\n<p>The evidence is consistent with a more broadly financed secretariat retaining recipient discretion, while government participants continue to shape direction through the community and fund specified projects. It does not establish donor command, total governmental exit, or a purely private financing base. Acquisition stops here for the combined forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-source-scopes-and-finite-search\">Custody, source scopes and finite search</h2>\n<p><code>transition-captures.json</code> records eight ordinary GET responses with exact URLs/times/hashes. Five contain substantive primary originals: French joint statement, MFAT annual report, MFAT OIA response, Packard grant card and Canadian contribution record. Three contain only access/challenge responses: NZ announcement shell and two Carnegie403s. All retained-byte hashes were checked. Reader-only Carnegie passages remain expressly distinguished from original captures; the two pages were not retried after the one public-reader substitute.</p>\n<p>The annual-report download has259pages, but only PDF66 is the finding source. A keyword-location scan and incidental PDF60 excerpt do not count as a full report read. The OIA table required visual inspection because PDF2 lacked extracted text; <code>transition-oia29223-page2.png</code> is a derivative of the retained original. Its values were read visually. No handover staff, assets, contracts or financial-note schedule was found in these selected instruments.</p>\n<p>Thirteen bounded queries covered the NZ/France handoff, official disclosures and the parent-supplied later grant leads: <code>site:beehive.govt.nz &quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot; funding</code>; <code>site:mfat.govt.nz &quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot; funding</code>; <code>site:elysee.fr &quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot;</code>; <code>site:diplomatie.gouv.fr &quot;Christchurch&quot; &quot;fondation&quot; financement</code>; <code>site:mfat.govt.nz &quot;Christchurch Call&quot; &quot;transition&quot; funding Foundation</code>; <code>site:dpmc.govt.nz &quot;Christchurch Call&quot; Foundation</code>; <code>site:mfat.govt.nz &quot;Christchurch Call&quot; &quot;Foundation&quot; &quot;OIA&quot;</code>; <code>site:beehive.govt.nz &quot;Christchurch Call&quot; &quot;million&quot; 2024</code>; <code>&quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot; (transfer OR assets OR secondment OR funding) site:mfat.govt.nz</code>; <code>&quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot; site:treasury.govt.nz</code>; <code>&quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot; &quot;France&quot; &quot;funding&quot; government</code>; <code>site:carnegie.org &quot;Christchurch Call Foundation&quot; &quot;2026&quot;</code>; <code>site:search.open.canada.ca &quot;26007&quot; &quot;Christchurch&quot;</code>.</p>\n<p>OIA29223&#x27;s exact link came from the official2024 OIA index, whose matching row was read; other disclosures were not harvested. DPMC2022/2023 background papers, later ministerial references and the2025 recipient press release appeared as discovery only. Existing closed Foundation/funding website routes were not retried. The French presidency&#x27;s independently published joint announcement provided the available original after the NZ challenge shell; this was not bypass of a private resource. The scope supplies no executed funding conditions or retained government appointment powers; their non-location in this finite pass is not evidence of nonexistence.</p>",
        "path": "christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09/transition-funding.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-transition-france",
          "w27-roost-s-mfat-transition",
          "w27-roost-s-mfat-costs",
          "w27-roost-s-packard2024",
          "w27-roost-s-carnegie2024",
          "w27-roost-s-carnegie2026",
          "w27-roost-s-canada26007"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded transition/funding acquisition closed. This note separates the 2024 support-function handoff, the continuing Call, the new Foundation, and later project funding. Legal-entity governance and community decision processes belong to the parallel lanes. No outreach, account, payment or private record access; no canonical changes.\n\n## What the handoff actually establishes\n\nThe **14 May 2024 joint NZ/France announcement** says support functions would move to a new secretariat funded by the Foundation, operating from **1 July 2024**, while New Zealand taxpayer funding for the Call would end on **30 June**. Donor pledges had been attracted, but no amounts or received instalments are stated. The Foundation would coordinate and support the wider community; leaders from all sectors would continue making key directional decisions. Ardern's special-envoy term would end, with her continuing as unpaid patron for dialogue and advocacy. The announcement does not assign her a foundation voting or appointment power.\n\nJoint official statement, French presidency publication (see source references) Complete substantive body and notes read. The NZ publication is the same joint-source family, not independent corroboration; its ordinary GET returned a challenge shell and was closed.\n\n**MFAT subsequently reports the transition as completed**, with New Zealand government funding ending in June 2024 and support functions financed by community/philanthropic pledges. This is a retrospective departmental performance account, not proof that every pledge had been paid. MFAT Annual Report 2023–24 (see source references) **PDF66/printed66**, complete Outcome1 paragraph context read. The report's publication date was not separately established; its reporting period is distinct from the September2026 retrieval.\n\nThe defensible change is government-funded coordination becoming Foundation-funded coordination, while governments remain in the wider initiative. These documents do not prove full NZ or French withdrawal, French funding termination, or an absence of continued diplomatic/in-kind work. No signed handover deed, staff secondment/novation schedule, asset inventory, IP assignment, transferred bank balance or government reserved appointment/approval instrument was acquired. Moving support functions does not by itself establish a transfer of ownership of assets or employment contracts.\n\n## The government baseline is operating expenditure, not foundation capitalization\n\nMFAT OIA29223, dated4April2024 (see source references) both pages read; AppendixA onPDF2 visually inspected. The response identifies costs incurred **by MFAT only**, in **NZD**, from1July2018 through29February2024.\n\n| Financial year | Reported actual expenditure NZD |\n| --- | --- |\n| 2018/19 | 87,936 |\n| 2019/20 | 530,486 |\n| 2020/21 | 856,130 |\n| 2021/22 | 357,172 |\n| 2022/23 | 638,646 |\n| 2023/24 YTD to29February2024 | 412,853 |\n\nThe last year is incomplete and subject to later review. These are not the Call's complete costs across all departments/countries, not a Foundation grant, and not payment vouchers. No cumulative influence budget is constructed. The response was listed for publication on31May2024 in MFAT's2024 OIA index; the letter itself is4April.\n\n## Actual named donor support after the restructuring\n\nPackard's CCF grant card (see source references) records **2024**, **$350,000**, **Term36**, for **general support**, in Just Societies / Democracy, Rights and Governance. Complete substantive card read and original retained. The card does not explicitly state the term's unit or currency, exact award/payment dates, expenditure allocation or donor appointment/clearance rights. Preserve its displayed fields; do not turn the likely36-month term into verified wording without a further source. The US donor's dollar context is consistent with USD, but the currency is not separately printed in this card.\n\nCarnegie's grant database, page13 (see source references) records **12December2024**, **$500,000**, **12months**, Special Opportunities Fund, to support CCF's launch. The full CCF entry was read through the primary public reader, lines152–194; ordinary GET403 was retained only as an error response and the route closed. The description emphasizes launch as an independent body but dates the spin-out to2023. That donor characterization does not override the joint governments' July2024 operational handoff. The discrepancy could reflect preparation versus operation, or imprecise donor wording; this pass does not resolve it.\n\nCarnegie's 10March2026 board-grants announcement (see source references) says its trustees approved grants at the **5March2026** meeting, including **$2,000,000 over24months** for CCF to counter terrorist/violent-extremist content online. Read title/date, approval introduction and CCF entry through the primary reader, lines30–34 and67–68. This earns **donor board approval**, not payment or a right to run Foundation decisions. Original GET403 was closed and retained as error only. Dollar amounts are displayed by a US donor; the brief entry does not separately label currency.\n\nThe two Carnegie records are distinct dated grants; do not treat the second as an amendment or sum them with Packard/Canada into current annual resources. None supplies cash receipt, remaining balance, renewal conditions, reporting schedule, a content veto or a named trustee's individual grant decision. The wider donor-list/funding-principles inquiry is a parallel lane, not silently supplied by these grant cards.\n\n## Later public project funding survives the NZ support-function exit\n\nPublic Safety Canada contribution26007 (see source references) reference088-2025-2026-Q3-00044. The complete original detail record identifies legal recipient **The Christchurch Call Foundation**, agreement value **CAD1,369,064**, term **23October2025–31March2028**, under the Community Resilience Fund.\n\nIts expected results are three workstreams: piloting interventions for TVEC risks in new technology sectors; partnering with **ROOST** to support open-source safety tools, particularly for smaller companies; and using the multistakeholder community to encourage uptake of the resulting interventions/tools/practices. These are **funded project purposes and expected results**, not proof the outputs have been delivered or accepted. The disclosure does not allocate the award among workstreams or specify a payment/approval schedule.\n\nThis directly distinguishes ended NZ secretariat funding from later Canadian project support to the Foundation. It is neither a Canadian payment to TAT nor CCIAO financing. The legal-recipient record supports the Foundation bridge without assigning Canada operational authority over ROOST or a particular classification. It does not establish a government appointment or policy-veto right.\n\n## Candidate structure and unresolved decision rights\n\n| From → to | Relation and state | Supported boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| NZ/France-led support functions → Foundation secretariat | Announced14May2024 for1July; later MFAT-reported completed transition | Function handoff; staff/assets/IP transfer terms not acquired. |\n| NZ government → prior Call support funding | Announced end30June2024; MFAT retrospective confirmation | Not full governmental withdrawal or a French funding-stop record. |\n| Packard → CCF | 2024 general-support donor grant record | Amount/Term as displayed; payment and governance rights unknown. |\n| Carnegie → CCF launch | 12December2024 grant,$500000,12months | Launch support; donor2023spin-out characterization not authoritative handoff date. |\n| Carnegie trustees → CCF support grant | 5March2026 donor board approval,$2m,24months | Approval is distinct from disbursement and recipient governance. |\n| Public Safety Canada → CCF agreement26007 → three expected workstreams | Disclosed contribution,2025–28,includingROOSTtool partnership | No payment, completed delivery, acceptance, suballocation or content mandate established. |\n\nThe high-value missing instrument is the actual2024 transition/handover agreement and schedules, joined to the Foundation's constituent instrument and any donor agreements that reserve rights. That could identify employer changes, assigned assets, retained governmental seats, approvals, obligations and termination remedies. Financial statements or grant-payment records would separately distinguish pledges/awards from receipts. No such document was requested from a person or private portal.\n\nThe evidence is consistent with a more broadly financed secretariat retaining recipient discretion, while government participants continue to shape direction through the community and fund specified projects. It does not establish donor command, total governmental exit, or a purely private financing base. Acquisition stops here for the combined forest review.\n\n## Custody, source scopes and finite search\n\n`transition-captures.json` records eight ordinary GET responses with exact URLs/times/hashes. Five contain substantive primary originals: French joint statement, MFAT annual report, MFAT OIA response, Packard grant card and Canadian contribution record. Three contain only access/challenge responses: NZ announcement shell and two Carnegie403s. All retained-byte hashes were checked. Reader-only Carnegie passages remain expressly distinguished from original captures; the two pages were not retried after the one public-reader substitute.\n\nThe annual-report download has259pages, but only PDF66 is the finding source. A keyword-location scan and incidental PDF60 excerpt do not count as a full report read. The OIA table required visual inspection because PDF2 lacked extracted text; `transition-oia29223-page2.png` is a derivative of the retained original. Its values were read visually. No handover staff, assets, contracts or financial-note schedule was found in these selected instruments.\n\nThirteen bounded queries covered the NZ/France handoff, official disclosures and the parent-supplied later grant leads: `site:beehive.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" funding`; `site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" funding`; `site:elysee.fr \"Christchurch Call Foundation\"`; `site:diplomatie.gouv.fr \"Christchurch\" \"fondation\" financement`; `site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"transition\" funding Foundation`; `site:dpmc.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" Foundation`; `site:mfat.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"Foundation\" \"OIA\"`; `site:beehive.govt.nz \"Christchurch Call\" \"million\" 2024`; `\"Christchurch Call Foundation\" (transfer OR assets OR secondment OR funding) site:mfat.govt.nz`; `\"Christchurch Call Foundation\" site:treasury.govt.nz`; `\"Christchurch Call Foundation\" \"France\" \"funding\" government`; `site:carnegie.org \"Christchurch Call Foundation\" \"2026\"`; `site:search.open.canada.ca \"26007\" \"Christchurch\"`.\n\nOIA29223's exact link came from the official2024 OIA index, whose matching row was read; other disclosures were not harvested. DPMC2022/2023 background papers, later ministerial references and the2025 recipient press release appeared as discovery only. Existing closed Foundation/funding website routes were not retried. The French presidency's independently published joint announcement provided the available original after the NZ challenge shell; this was not bypass of a private resource. The scope supplies no executed funding conditions or retained government appointment powers; their non-location in this finite pass is not evidence of nonexistence.\n",
        "file": "research/christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09-transition-funding.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support",
        "title": "KR Foundation, specified advocacy and CMA's changing funding mix",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. A named Danish grant is established, with a programme purpose more specific than general organizational support. Later recipient reporting also changes the temporal picture: foundations dominate the2025funding graphic, whereas major donors dominate2024. These sources establish published purposes, resource relatio",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. A named Danish grant is established, with a programme purpose more specific than general organizational support. Later recipient reporting also changes the temporal picture: foundations dominate the2025funding graphic, whereas major donors dominate2024. These sources establish published purposes, resource relationships and internal foundation authority, not a command to undertake the February2025Senate intervention.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-actual-grant\">The actual grant</h2>\n<p>KR Foundation&#x27;s2023annual-report grant table, printed46/PDF24 of the retained double-page republication, lists Check My Ads, US, DKK1,991,232 granted in2023, start1May2023, end1May2025. Its project is titled &#x27;Dismantle the disinformation economy: cut climate change and election disinformation off at the source.&#x27; Root visually inspected the row, headers and amount. The old [donor-hosted report address](http[local research file] remains indexed with the same table but ordinaryGET returned404. Root obtained the report from an [Americans for Public Trust republication](http[local research file] this is a donor-authored document in third-party custody, not an endorsement of the host&#x27;s framing or a fresh donor original. SHA301137e051f62930e4be97813bdd0996f81a5fd7d4778007bd329128855613d5.</p>\n<p>The live donor website links a <a>2023grant list</a>.</p>\n<p>The records identify actual Danish support consistent with CMA&#x27;s own declaration. They do not establish that KR was its only Danish supporter or permit allocating the whole grant to calendar2024or the Senate campaign. DKK is retained without a speculative exchange-rate conversion. The2025award begins after the Februaryletters; the earlier award term overlaps them, but its named purpose concerns climate and election disinformation, not CSAM.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-funder-says-it-is-building\">What the funder says it is building</h2>\n<p>The same2023report, printed16–17/PDF9, explicitly arranges supported organizations around regulatory change, pressure on fossil-fuel service providers, and capacity building. Root viewed the actual diagram after extraction produced repeated hidden text. It places CMA, Center for Countering Digital Hate and Stop Funding Heat in the same category concerning accountability of enablers. It places Friends of the Earth/CAAD in a separate capacity-building category. This is the funder&#x27;s published programme architecture. It proves neither that every listed organization collaborated on one campaign nor that any one directed another. The stated2023geographic priorities include Europe, USA and Australia. Those programme statements, together with the named grant, are stronger evidence of intentional funding around an agenda than mere overlap in a donor list.</p>\n<p>The current [How we work page](http[local research file] substantive primary reader, says applications are invitation-only and grants board-approved. OrdinaryGET returned455; that response is not the substantive page. The [currently linked statutes translation](http[local research file] original captured and all five pages read, supplies more exact authority. Section5 assigns distribution, eligibility, scale and timing to the board and permits defined delegation to the chairmanship/executive director. Section7 entitles VILLUM FONDEN to appoint up to two of five-to-seven board members; remaining seats are filled by board election. Election of those remaining members requires a majority with no more than one dissent. This means two dissenting eligible directors can block such an election; it does not prove that the founder-appointed directors coordinated votes or can individually dictate grants. Ordinary decisions use simple majority and a chair casting vote. Section8 specifies joint signatures or delegated power to bind the foundation. This is internal KR authority, not authority over CMA&#x27;s publications.</p>\n<p>Sections1and4 identify VILLUM FONDEN and descendants of Villum Kann Rasmussen as founders and a DKK10million initial cash capital, with no return of that initial capital to founders. No present grant is traced to a particular upstream transfer, and no wider family, company or state financing claim is made. The original first-board names in the statutes are historical, not today&#x27;s board. Current bios were read only as context and are not used to retroactively assign the2023grant vote.</p>\n<p>No executed CMA award agreement, approved proposal, reporting template, tranche condition, clawback, editorial approval, target list or evaluation was found in the inspected grant lists, reports, statutory text and two focused searches. Those instruments remain unacquired; invitation-only selection is an actual programme-entry gate, not proof of later editorial veto. The linked2023financial report was located and the opening reader through the auditor&#x27;s introductory scope was inspected; its financial totals and grant accounting have not been adopted here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-consequential-time-correction\">A consequential time correction</h2>\n<p>The [CMA2025annual report](http[local research file] original SHA570059f9a0e37ddbf5993033765238a4717d089f39b81db3c02ba8632e4193a2, PDF35 visually inspected, explicitly reports foundation grants82.8%, major donors12.3%, individual donors4.9%, four new institutional donors and three multi-year renewals. It also adds UK and Canadian foundation support alongside USA and Denmark. This supersedes any implication that2024&#x27;s major-donor majority describes the later mix. Absolute income, category definitions and accounting basis still are not given on that page. The shift may combine new funding, reduced large gifts, recognition timing or recategorization; the two graphics alone do not resolve the cause or identify every new funder.</p>\n<p>Scoped report text read atPDF26,29,32and35 adds direct institutional leads: CMA claims a TAG complaint, support for industry KYC and MRC changes; it describes an Ofcom Online Safety Act additional-safety submission seeking tighter monetization controls. Its policy platform names KYC due diligence and mandatory supply-chain transparency alongside privacy-respecting advertising. These are the organization&#x27;s claims and proposals, not observed enforcement or an established duty for all internet users to identify themselves. The actual Ofcom submission and its proposed subjects, triggers and safeguards would decide more than inference from the initials KYC. The rest of the37-page report has been captured, not comprehensively reviewed; incidental excerpts are not a whole-report audit.</p>\n<p>Secondary search also surfaced a2025Oak Foundation grant claim; it remains unverified discovery for a later named-funder reconciliation, not an accepted edge here. No unsolicited expansion into donor genealogy occurred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody\">Custody</h2>\n<p>Per-file captureJSON records status, URLs, bytes and hashes. The original2023list SHA4cad141c609ac4de80c101d1bcce82f7fc291e62c0470ef60e77117477404742; original2025list SHA40704711dab007be9129e88e933134a8fc15bf4532cde43800e2c1a968a0e65d; originalstatutes SHA14806448fb046190304f56f5471239aeb3405645d176910d9396040bec8a8fa7. The failed oldreport request is a404HTML response, originally named.pdf by the capture script; its manifest explicitly saysoriginal_pdf=false. It was never parsed as aPDF or treated as missing evidence of suppression. PNGs of the table, programme diagram,2025list and CMA2025chart were actually viewed. Sources denied or missing were closed; no challenges, accounts, visible UI, outreach or ZIP work occurred.</p>",
        "path": "cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09/kr-support.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-kr2023",
          "w31-fa-s-kr2023list",
          "w31-fa-s-kr2025list",
          "w31-fa-s-krstatutes",
          "w31-fa-s-cma2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. A named Danish grant is established, with a programme purpose more specific than general organizational support. Later recipient reporting also changes the temporal picture: foundations dominate the2025funding graphic, whereas major donors dominate2024. These sources establish published purposes, resource relationships and internal foundation authority, not a command to undertake the February2025Senate intervention.\n\n## The actual grant\n\nKR Foundation's2023annual-report grant table, printed46/PDF24 of the retained double-page republication, lists Check My Ads, US, DKK1,991,232 granted in2023, start1May2023, end1May2025. Its project is titled 'Dismantle the disinformation economy: cut climate change and election disinformation off at the source.' Root visually inspected the row, headers and amount. The old donor-hosted report address (see source references) remains indexed with the same table but ordinaryGET returned404. Root obtained the report from an Americans for Public Trust republication (see source references) this is a donor-authored document in third-party custody, not an endorsement of the host's framing or a fresh donor original. SHA301137e051f62930e4be97813bdd0996f81a5fd7d4778007bd329128855613d5.\n\nThe live donor website links a 2023grant list.\n\nThe records identify actual Danish support consistent with CMA's own declaration. They do not establish that KR was its only Danish supporter or permit allocating the whole grant to calendar2024or the Senate campaign. DKK is retained without a speculative exchange-rate conversion. The2025award begins after the Februaryletters; the earlier award term overlaps them, but its named purpose concerns climate and election disinformation, not CSAM.\n\n## What the funder says it is building\n\nThe same2023report, printed16–17/PDF9, explicitly arranges supported organizations around regulatory change, pressure on fossil-fuel service providers, and capacity building. Root viewed the actual diagram after extraction produced repeated hidden text. It places CMA, Center for Countering Digital Hate and Stop Funding Heat in the same category concerning accountability of enablers. It places Friends of the Earth/CAAD in a separate capacity-building category. This is the funder's published programme architecture. It proves neither that every listed organization collaborated on one campaign nor that any one directed another. The stated2023geographic priorities include Europe, USA and Australia. Those programme statements, together with the named grant, are stronger evidence of intentional funding around an agenda than mere overlap in a donor list.\n\nThe current How we work page (see source references) substantive primary reader, says applications are invitation-only and grants board-approved. OrdinaryGET returned455; that response is not the substantive page. The currently linked statutes translation (see source references) original captured and all five pages read, supplies more exact authority. Section5 assigns distribution, eligibility, scale and timing to the board and permits defined delegation to the chairmanship/executive director. Section7 entitles VILLUM FONDEN to appoint up to two of five-to-seven board members; remaining seats are filled by board election. Election of those remaining members requires a majority with no more than one dissent. This means two dissenting eligible directors can block such an election; it does not prove that the founder-appointed directors coordinated votes or can individually dictate grants. Ordinary decisions use simple majority and a chair casting vote. Section8 specifies joint signatures or delegated power to bind the foundation. This is internal KR authority, not authority over CMA's publications.\n\nSections1and4 identify VILLUM FONDEN and descendants of Villum Kann Rasmussen as founders and a DKK10million initial cash capital, with no return of that initial capital to founders. No present grant is traced to a particular upstream transfer, and no wider family, company or state financing claim is made. The original first-board names in the statutes are historical, not today's board. Current bios were read only as context and are not used to retroactively assign the2023grant vote.\n\nNo executed CMA award agreement, approved proposal, reporting template, tranche condition, clawback, editorial approval, target list or evaluation was found in the inspected grant lists, reports, statutory text and two focused searches. Those instruments remain unacquired; invitation-only selection is an actual programme-entry gate, not proof of later editorial veto. The linked2023financial report was located and the opening reader through the auditor's introductory scope was inspected; its financial totals and grant accounting have not been adopted here.\n\n## A consequential time correction\n\nThe CMA2025annual report (see source references) original SHA570059f9a0e37ddbf5993033765238a4717d089f39b81db3c02ba8632e4193a2, PDF35 visually inspected, explicitly reports foundation grants82.8%, major donors12.3%, individual donors4.9%, four new institutional donors and three multi-year renewals. It also adds UK and Canadian foundation support alongside USA and Denmark. This supersedes any implication that2024's major-donor majority describes the later mix. Absolute income, category definitions and accounting basis still are not given on that page. The shift may combine new funding, reduced large gifts, recognition timing or recategorization; the two graphics alone do not resolve the cause or identify every new funder.\n\nScoped report text read atPDF26,29,32and35 adds direct institutional leads: CMA claims a TAG complaint, support for industry KYC and MRC changes; it describes an Ofcom Online Safety Act additional-safety submission seeking tighter monetization controls. Its policy platform names KYC due diligence and mandatory supply-chain transparency alongside privacy-respecting advertising. These are the organization's claims and proposals, not observed enforcement or an established duty for all internet users to identify themselves. The actual Ofcom submission and its proposed subjects, triggers and safeguards would decide more than inference from the initials KYC. The rest of the37-page report has been captured, not comprehensively reviewed; incidental excerpts are not a whole-report audit.\n\nSecondary search also surfaced a2025Oak Foundation grant claim; it remains unverified discovery for a later named-funder reconciliation, not an accepted edge here. No unsolicited expansion into donor genealogy occurred.\n\n## Custody\n\nPer-file captureJSON records status, URLs, bytes and hashes. The original2023list SHA4cad141c609ac4de80c101d1bcce82f7fc291e62c0470ef60e77117477404742; original2025list SHA40704711dab007be9129e88e933134a8fc15bf4532cde43800e2c1a968a0e65d; originalstatutes SHA14806448fb046190304f56f5471239aeb3405645d176910d9396040bec8a8fa7. The failed oldreport request is a404HTML response, originally named.pdf by the capture script; its manifest explicitly saysoriginal_pdf=false. It was never parsed as aPDF or treated as missing evidence of suppression. PNGs of the table, programme diagram,2025list and CMA2025chart were actually viewed. Sources denied or missing were closed; no challenges, accounts, visible UI, outreach or ZIP work occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09-kr-support.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings",
        "title": "CMA's monetization proposal and Ofcom's response",
        "description": "Closed bounded acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet concerns Check My Ads Institute's response to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures consultation, not an enacted CMA rule. The consultation opened 30 June and closed 20 October 2025. Its regulator-hosted response entry is dated 11 December 2025; that is the displayed publication/listing date, not an inde",
        "html": "<p>Closed bounded acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet concerns Check My Ads Institute&#x27;s response to Ofcom&#x27;s Additional Safety Measures consultation, not an enacted CMA rule. The consultation opened 30 June and closed 20 October 2025. Its regulator-hosted response entry is dated 11 December 2025; that is the displayed publication/listing date, not an independently established submission date.</p>\n<p>The submission connects platform safety to access to monetization: verification of creators and advertisers, content clearance, account bans, advertiser disclosure and refunds. Ofcom later explicitly considered CMA&#x27;s crisis-revenue request but did not recommend specific monetization practices in its crisis measures. The disposition of CMA&#x27;s other proposals is not established by this packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"proposed-subjects-triggers-and-decisions\">Proposed subjects, triggers and decisions</h2>\n<p>All page numbers below are one-based PDF pages of the 31-page [CMA response](http[local research file] Retained full extracted text: <a>submission.reader.txt</a>. It is a reader derivative, not the PDF original.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Scope</th>\n<th>Proposed authority or consequence</th>\n<th>Locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Monetizing creators and advertisers</td>\n<td>Stronger identity/customer checks; visibility into creator payment and location; ability to trace repeat violators. No prescribed identity document or technical verification standard.</td>\n<td>Q6, PDF2–3; Q33, PDF10; Q56, PDF14–15</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content showing indications of illegal-harm risk</td>\n<td>Withhold monetization until platform systems clear the risk; manually review content indicating possible illegality before monetizing it. Platforms&#x27; systems and moderation teams make these proposed decisions; no prior court finding is specified.</td>\n<td>Q31, PDF9; Q35, PDF10</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Adult CSAM offenders and repeat illegal-content monetizers</td>\n<td>Ban the specified adult users and prevent return; permanently ban repeat illegal-content monetizers and claw back revenue for advertisers. These combine account-access and monetization proposals, which are different restrictions.</td>\n<td>Q36, PDF10; Q39, PDF11</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ads alongside identified harmful/unsafe content</td>\n<td>Report the incident to Ofcom and advertisers; refund advertisers without a minimum-value exemption. The categorical invoice example is illustrative. The response sometimes uses harmful/unsafe wording rather than only established illegality.</td>\n<td>Q11–12, PDF4–6</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Livestream and embedded-video advertising</td>\n<td>Restrict children&#x27;s automated ad monetization; favor direct/reserved advertising for livestreams; consider off-platform harm where embedded video still earns platform/creator revenue.</td>\n<td>Q7 and Q9, PDF3–4; Q14, PDF6</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Public-safety crisis</td>\n<td>Support crisis demonetization and seek platform revenue disclosure/accounting with refunds where possible. This qualified crisis-refund proposal differs from Q12&#x27;s broader refund request.</td>\n<td>Q49–52, PDF12–14</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The identified KYC/KYBC subjects include content creators and advertisers, not necessarily incorporated companies. The response does not prescribe verification for every reader, viewer or ordinary internet user. Nevertheless, identifying a monetizing creator could affect pseudonymity and access to income. Absence of universal user ID does not eliminate that consequence. Q56 also uses a different expansion of KYBC (“Know-Your-Business-Consumer”); the response does not supply a settled definition or enrollment procedure.</p>\n<p>CMA endorses the package&#x27;s proportionality but supplies no comprehensive verification-data minimization, retention, identity-error correction, creator appeal or correction-propagation mechanism in the inspected response. It declines Q42–44 on age-assessment appeals and highly effective age assurance; those nonanswers are not affirmative support or opposition. Its appendix reproduces Twitch and TikTok appeal language and YouTube human-review/context exceptions (PDF17–18 and25). Those are attributed platform-policy quotations, not a new CMA-designed procedure or independently verified current platform rules. No underlying policy execution or actual refund is established.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-explicit-decision-and-its-limit\">The explicit decision, and its limit</h2>\n<p>Ofcom&#x27;s [crisis-response statement](http[local research file] published <strong>9 June 2026</strong>, records CMA&#x27;s revenue-disclosure/refund request at <strong>A1.147, PDF47/printed47</strong>, citing CMA response p14. At <strong>A1.148</strong>, Ofcom recognizes advertising incentives but focuses the measures on illegal content and child harms: a provider may choose proportionate advertising-integrity steps, while the measures do not recommend specific monetization practices. <strong>A1.150–151</strong> preserve human oversight, transparency, redress and risk-based tailoring. This is explicit consideration and non-adoption of specified monetization practices in this particular measure, not proof that Ofcom rejected every CMA identity, refund or content-review proposal.</p>\n<p>The same statement explains that crisis measures do not change existing moderation/appeal requirements (A1.127–131); expression, privacy and data protection still constrain action, including data minimization and storage limitation (A1.132–138). Section3.45, PDF16, excludes a general intervention against misinformation/disinformation unless it falls within the relevant illegal-content or child-harm scope. These are Ofcom&#x27;s stated boundaries, not evidence of completed implementation or a guarantee against every erroneous restriction.</p>\n<p>The consultation index still displayed a pending-statement label and a 12 May 2026 update when inspected. That aggregate label cannot override the dated June crisis decision. Section1.12 of the June statement expected most remaining decisions in autumn 2026; this packet does not establish their status on 9 September or treat the June forecast as a current completion record.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-remaining-discriminator\">Custody and remaining discriminator</h2>\n<p>The reused original <a href=\"https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">CMA annual report</a>, PDF29, confirms CMA&#x27;s own account of this submission and calls for stricter monetization controls/transparency. Its linked context page was inaccessible: primary reader failed, then one ordinary GET returned 403. That route is closed.</p>\n<p>The submission&#x27;s ordinary GET also returned 403; the working official reader supplied all 31 pages of extracted text, including all 60 questions, appendix and footnotes. Image-only Exhibit A was not visually inspected. No submission PDF original was retained. The Ofcom index and June statement were read through the official reader, with no original bytes acquired. <a>ofcom-index-and-disposition.reader.txt</a> preserves the scoped returns. <a>submission-captures.json</a> records exact reading extents, dates, hashes and access boundaries. Stored reader text is not original-byte custody.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to a binding monetization-control interpretation is visible in the regulator&#x27;s own response: it considered CMA&#x27;s fiscal request while leaving the specific advertising response to proportionate provider choice. The useful missing instrument is the final disposition of CMA&#x27;s creator/advertiser verification and pre-monetization review proposals, together with any adopted operational standard that specifies identity evidence, error correction and appeal. A platform&#x27;s actual implementation would be a further, separate record. No additional acquisition branch was opened.</p>",
        "path": "cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09/submission-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cmasub"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed bounded acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet concerns Check My Ads Institute's response to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures consultation, not an enacted CMA rule. The consultation opened 30 June and closed 20 October 2025. Its regulator-hosted response entry is dated 11 December 2025; that is the displayed publication/listing date, not an independently established submission date.\n\nThe submission connects platform safety to access to monetization: verification of creators and advertisers, content clearance, account bans, advertiser disclosure and refunds. Ofcom later explicitly considered CMA's crisis-revenue request but did not recommend specific monetization practices in its crisis measures. The disposition of CMA's other proposals is not established by this packet.\n\n## Proposed subjects, triggers and decisions\n\nAll page numbers below are one-based PDF pages of the 31-page CMA response (see source references) Retained full extracted text: submission.reader.txt. It is a reader derivative, not the PDF original.\n\n| Scope | Proposed authority or consequence | Locator |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Monetizing creators and advertisers | Stronger identity/customer checks; visibility into creator payment and location; ability to trace repeat violators. No prescribed identity document or technical verification standard. | Q6, PDF2–3; Q33, PDF10; Q56, PDF14–15 |\n| Content showing indications of illegal-harm risk | Withhold monetization until platform systems clear the risk; manually review content indicating possible illegality before monetizing it. Platforms' systems and moderation teams make these proposed decisions; no prior court finding is specified. | Q31, PDF9; Q35, PDF10 |\n| Adult CSAM offenders and repeat illegal-content monetizers | Ban the specified adult users and prevent return; permanently ban repeat illegal-content monetizers and claw back revenue for advertisers. These combine account-access and monetization proposals, which are different restrictions. | Q36, PDF10; Q39, PDF11 |\n| Ads alongside identified harmful/unsafe content | Report the incident to Ofcom and advertisers; refund advertisers without a minimum-value exemption. The categorical invoice example is illustrative. The response sometimes uses harmful/unsafe wording rather than only established illegality. | Q11–12, PDF4–6 |\n| Livestream and embedded-video advertising | Restrict children's automated ad monetization; favor direct/reserved advertising for livestreams; consider off-platform harm where embedded video still earns platform/creator revenue. | Q7 and Q9, PDF3–4; Q14, PDF6 |\n| Public-safety crisis | Support crisis demonetization and seek platform revenue disclosure/accounting with refunds where possible. This qualified crisis-refund proposal differs from Q12's broader refund request. | Q49–52, PDF12–14 |\n\nThe identified KYC/KYBC subjects include content creators and advertisers, not necessarily incorporated companies. The response does not prescribe verification for every reader, viewer or ordinary internet user. Nevertheless, identifying a monetizing creator could affect pseudonymity and access to income. Absence of universal user ID does not eliminate that consequence. Q56 also uses a different expansion of KYBC (“Know-Your-Business-Consumer”); the response does not supply a settled definition or enrollment procedure.\n\nCMA endorses the package's proportionality but supplies no comprehensive verification-data minimization, retention, identity-error correction, creator appeal or correction-propagation mechanism in the inspected response. It declines Q42–44 on age-assessment appeals and highly effective age assurance; those nonanswers are not affirmative support or opposition. Its appendix reproduces Twitch and TikTok appeal language and YouTube human-review/context exceptions (PDF17–18 and25). Those are attributed platform-policy quotations, not a new CMA-designed procedure or independently verified current platform rules. No underlying policy execution or actual refund is established.\n\n## The explicit decision, and its limit\n\nOfcom's crisis-response statement (see source references) published **9 June 2026**, records CMA's revenue-disclosure/refund request at **A1.147, PDF47/printed47**, citing CMA response p14. At **A1.148**, Ofcom recognizes advertising incentives but focuses the measures on illegal content and child harms: a provider may choose proportionate advertising-integrity steps, while the measures do not recommend specific monetization practices. **A1.150–151** preserve human oversight, transparency, redress and risk-based tailoring. This is explicit consideration and non-adoption of specified monetization practices in this particular measure, not proof that Ofcom rejected every CMA identity, refund or content-review proposal.\n\nThe same statement explains that crisis measures do not change existing moderation/appeal requirements (A1.127–131); expression, privacy and data protection still constrain action, including data minimization and storage limitation (A1.132–138). Section3.45, PDF16, excludes a general intervention against misinformation/disinformation unless it falls within the relevant illegal-content or child-harm scope. These are Ofcom's stated boundaries, not evidence of completed implementation or a guarantee against every erroneous restriction.\n\nThe consultation index still displayed a pending-statement label and a 12 May 2026 update when inspected. That aggregate label cannot override the dated June crisis decision. Section1.12 of the June statement expected most remaining decisions in autumn 2026; this packet does not establish their status on 9 September or treat the June forecast as a current completion record.\n\n## Custody and remaining discriminator\n\nThe reused original [CMA annual report](https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2025-annual-report-1.pdf), PDF29, confirms CMA's own account of this submission and calls for stricter monetization controls/transparency. Its linked context page was inaccessible: primary reader failed, then one ordinary GET returned 403. That route is closed.\n\nThe submission's ordinary GET also returned 403; the working official reader supplied all 31 pages of extracted text, including all 60 questions, appendix and footnotes. Image-only Exhibit A was not visually inspected. No submission PDF original was retained. The Ofcom index and June statement were read through the official reader, with no original bytes acquired. ofcom-index-and-disposition.reader.txt preserves the scoped returns. submission-captures.json records exact reading extents, dates, hashes and access boundaries. Stored reader text is not original-byte custody.\n\nThe strongest rival to a binding monetization-control interpretation is visible in the regulator's own response: it considered CMA's fiscal request while leaving the specific advertising response to proportionate provider choice. The useful missing instrument is the final disposition of CMA's creator/advertiser verification and pre-monetization review proposals, together with any adopted operational standard that specifies identity evidence, error correction and appeal. A platform's actual implementation would be a further, separate record. No additional acquisition branch was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
        "title": "Donor resources behind CMA capacity: Democracy Fund and Ford",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded donor-side acquisition closed. The record supports general organizational support predating the February 2025 advocacy, but not an earmark for the Senate letters or donor approval of their wording. This lane does not equate approval, a future-payment balance, a reported payment and the recipient's accounting recognition.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded donor-side acquisition closed. The record supports general organizational support predating the February 2025 advocacy, but not an earmark for the Senate letters or donor approval of their wording. This lane does not equate approval, a future-payment balance, a reported payment and the recipient&#x27;s accounting recognition.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-established-and-what-still-needs-alignment\">What is established and what still needs alignment</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Donor-side record</th>\n<th>Inspected state</th>\n<th>Amount, period and purpose</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Democracy Fund, Inc., 2023 Form 990-PF, Part XIV</td>\n<td>CMA is in both the paid-during-year and approved-for-future-payment schedules</td>\n<td>Paid row is associated in the reader/index with USD 450,000, general support; calendar 2023. Future-payment row is also general support.</td>\n<td>PDF text is interleaved across rows. This worker has not visually verified the paid amount&#x27;s alignment and does not assign the future-payment amount. Do not total the two schedules as independent awards.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Democracy Fund, Inc., 2024 Form 990-PF, Part XIV</td>\n<td>CMA appears in paid-during-year continuation</td>\n<td>Reader/index associates USD 250,000 with general support; calendar 2024.</td>\n<td>Numerical row alignment needs a facsimile check before treating it as a fully verified payment amount. The schedule category itself is a donor report of payment, not an acquired bank transaction or proof of the recipient&#x27;s use.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ford grant 144432</td>\n<td>Complete substantive grant-detail record read</td>\n<td>USD 200,000 approved October 2022; start October 2022, end September 2023; General Support; Regular grant; Technology and Society programme, United States funding office</td>\n<td>Approval/term record, not cash disbursement evidence or executed conditions.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ford March 2025 award</td>\n<td>Official search-index result only</td>\n<td>Indexed USD 400,000, General Support, March 2025</td>\n<td>Exact grant identifier, term and actual detailed record were not obtained. Retain discovery; no approved/paid edge from this lane.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The [2023 Democracy Fund return](http[local research file] is a 63-page public donor copy. Relevant locators are PDF20/printed17, Part XIV grants paid, reader2118–2213; and PDF42/printed39, grants approved for future payment, reader4240–4331. PDF5 identifies calendar2023 and Democracy Fund, Inc., EIN38-3926408. The future-payment entry is a meaningful reconciliation warning: later payments could discharge an earlier commitment, but no grant identifier or instalment schedule here proves that particular linkage. Its value is therefore withheld rather than guessed from nearby interleaved numbers.</p>\n<p>The [2024 return](http[local research file] has 56 PDF pages. Relevant locus is PDF17/printed18, Part XIV grants paid, reader1968–2067; PDF1 identifies calendar2024 and the same donor/EIN. The website upload path is not the payment date. A return&#x27;s reported annual payment cannot identify the day money reached CMA or its allocation to work in February2025. No other recipient, asset holding or donor genealogy was investigated.</p>\n<p>[Ford grant144432](http[local research file] primary-reader lines124–160, expressly supplies the approval and grant term. Its short public purpose is General Support, not a named CSAM, Senate, TAG, DV or Adalytics project. The page does not expose a reporting schedule, tranche conditions, approval veto, work-product licence or communications review right. Those rights are unacquired, not proved absent.</p>\n<p>Ford&#x27;s [indexed database result](http[local research file] supplies the later USD400,000/March2025 discovery. Opening that result returned a database heading without the grant rows; the actual More about this grantee link from grant144432 returned a reader cache miss. Finite exact-name/date/amount searches did not resolve a grant-specific identifier. No grant page was guessed, no verification challenge was attempted, and the result is not promoted to a confirmed cash receipt. If later authenticated, March approval would still postdate the February letters and would not itself establish retrospective campaign funding.</p>\n<h2 id=\"influence-interpretation-and-the-discriminating-record\">Influence interpretation and the discriminating record</h2>\n<p>General support can finance staffing, research and advocacy capacity even without a project earmark. The defensible connection is therefore resource provision to the organization, with broad purpose compatibility. The rival explanation to donor-directed Senate advocacy is that donors supported CMA&#x27;s existing mission while CMA independently selected tactics. Both can coexist with donor reporting requirements; these public records do not resolve the actual decision rights. No sum across Ford approvals, Democracy Fund payment schedules and CMA annual-report revenue is offered.</p>\n<p>The best next record is the actual general-support award agreement and instalment/recognition schedule spanning 2023–2025, matched by grant identifier to the donor&#x27;s payment record and CMA&#x27;s books. It would distinguish future commitments from subsequent payments and expose any reporting, approval, clawback or earmark condition. The specific Ford2025 grant identifier and a readable facsimile of the three Democracy Fund rows are narrower prerequisite gaps, not invitations to expand into unrelated funders. Root&#x27;s recipient-side packet should remain the separate source for CMA income, staffing and reported delivery.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-and-custody\">Acquisition and custody</h2>\n<p><code>donor-captures.json</code> records source scopes, reader references, retained derivatives and hashes. No substantive original PDF or grant HTML was captured in this lane. Each Democracy Fund ordinary GET returned403 and was closed; the official primary PDF reader succeeded. Ford&#x27;s two ordinary HTTP200 responses were human-verification shells, retained as transport evidence, not original grant data. No challenge was solved or submitted. The primary reader supplied the historical144432 record. The public index had no rows in the opened reader, and the linked grantee reader returned cache miss; those routes were not retried.</p>\n<p>Screenshot calls for Democracy Fund2024 PDF17 and2023 PDF20/42 returned only textual references through this worker&#x27;s wrapper, not viewable images. They are not visual checks. This is why numerical row alignment remains qualified. The full financial returns, unrelated portfolio entries, signed award terms, donor correspondence and bank records were not audited. No account, form, outreach, paid source, visible UI, case, visual, ZIP, current-work or forest edit occurred. Acquisition is closed for the combined forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09/donor-resources.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-democracy2024",
          "w31-fa-s-democracy2023",
          "w31-fa-s-ford2022",
          "w31-fa-s-ford2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded donor-side acquisition closed. The record supports general organizational support predating the February 2025 advocacy, but not an earmark for the Senate letters or donor approval of their wording. This lane does not equate approval, a future-payment balance, a reported payment and the recipient's accounting recognition.\n\n## What is established and what still needs alignment\n\n| Donor-side record | Inspected state | Amount, period and purpose | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Democracy Fund, Inc., 2023 Form 990-PF, Part XIV | CMA is in both the paid-during-year and approved-for-future-payment schedules | Paid row is associated in the reader/index with USD 450,000, general support; calendar 2023. Future-payment row is also general support. | PDF text is interleaved across rows. This worker has not visually verified the paid amount's alignment and does not assign the future-payment amount. Do not total the two schedules as independent awards. |\n| Democracy Fund, Inc., 2024 Form 990-PF, Part XIV | CMA appears in paid-during-year continuation | Reader/index associates USD 250,000 with general support; calendar 2024. | Numerical row alignment needs a facsimile check before treating it as a fully verified payment amount. The schedule category itself is a donor report of payment, not an acquired bank transaction or proof of the recipient's use. |\n| Ford grant 144432 | Complete substantive grant-detail record read | USD 200,000 approved October 2022; start October 2022, end September 2023; General Support; Regular grant; Technology and Society programme, United States funding office | Approval/term record, not cash disbursement evidence or executed conditions. |\n| Ford March 2025 award | Official search-index result only | Indexed USD 400,000, General Support, March 2025 | Exact grant identifier, term and actual detailed record were not obtained. Retain discovery; no approved/paid edge from this lane. |\n\nThe 2023 Democracy Fund return (see source references) is a 63-page public donor copy. Relevant locators are PDF20/printed17, Part XIV grants paid, reader2118–2213; and PDF42/printed39, grants approved for future payment, reader4240–4331. PDF5 identifies calendar2023 and Democracy Fund, Inc., EIN38-3926408. The future-payment entry is a meaningful reconciliation warning: later payments could discharge an earlier commitment, but no grant identifier or instalment schedule here proves that particular linkage. Its value is therefore withheld rather than guessed from nearby interleaved numbers.\n\nThe 2024 return (see source references) has 56 PDF pages. Relevant locus is PDF17/printed18, Part XIV grants paid, reader1968–2067; PDF1 identifies calendar2024 and the same donor/EIN. The website upload path is not the payment date. A return's reported annual payment cannot identify the day money reached CMA or its allocation to work in February2025. No other recipient, asset holding or donor genealogy was investigated.\n\nFord grant144432 (see source references) primary-reader lines124–160, expressly supplies the approval and grant term. Its short public purpose is General Support, not a named CSAM, Senate, TAG, DV or Adalytics project. The page does not expose a reporting schedule, tranche conditions, approval veto, work-product licence or communications review right. Those rights are unacquired, not proved absent.\n\nFord's indexed database result (see source references) supplies the later USD400,000/March2025 discovery. Opening that result returned a database heading without the grant rows; the actual More about this grantee link from grant144432 returned a reader cache miss. Finite exact-name/date/amount searches did not resolve a grant-specific identifier. No grant page was guessed, no verification challenge was attempted, and the result is not promoted to a confirmed cash receipt. If later authenticated, March approval would still postdate the February letters and would not itself establish retrospective campaign funding.\n\n## Influence interpretation and the discriminating record\n\nGeneral support can finance staffing, research and advocacy capacity even without a project earmark. The defensible connection is therefore resource provision to the organization, with broad purpose compatibility. The rival explanation to donor-directed Senate advocacy is that donors supported CMA's existing mission while CMA independently selected tactics. Both can coexist with donor reporting requirements; these public records do not resolve the actual decision rights. No sum across Ford approvals, Democracy Fund payment schedules and CMA annual-report revenue is offered.\n\nThe best next record is the actual general-support award agreement and instalment/recognition schedule spanning 2023–2025, matched by grant identifier to the donor's payment record and CMA's books. It would distinguish future commitments from subsequent payments and expose any reporting, approval, clawback or earmark condition. The specific Ford2025 grant identifier and a readable facsimile of the three Democracy Fund rows are narrower prerequisite gaps, not invitations to expand into unrelated funders. Root's recipient-side packet should remain the separate source for CMA income, staffing and reported delivery.\n\n## Acquisition and custody\n\n`donor-captures.json` records source scopes, reader references, retained derivatives and hashes. No substantive original PDF or grant HTML was captured in this lane. Each Democracy Fund ordinary GET returned403 and was closed; the official primary PDF reader succeeded. Ford's two ordinary HTTP200 responses were human-verification shells, retained as transport evidence, not original grant data. No challenge was solved or submitted. The primary reader supplied the historical144432 record. The public index had no rows in the opened reader, and the linked grantee reader returned cache miss; those routes were not retried.\n\nScreenshot calls for Democracy Fund2024 PDF17 and2023 PDF20/42 returned only textual references through this worker's wrapper, not viewable images. They are not visual checks. This is why numerical row alignment remains qualified. The full financial returns, unrelated portfolio entries, signed award terms, donor correspondence and bank records were not audited. No account, form, outreach, paid source, visible UI, case, visual, ZIP, current-work or forest edit occurred. Acquisition is closed for the combined forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources",
        "title": "Recipient resources and the decision-rights gap",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded recipient acquisition closed. Root read the 26-page annual report text in full and visually inspected PDF24 and25 of cma-annual2024-250226.pdf. The latter supplies actual chart alignment and complete professional names. These are CMA's own retrospective statements, not an independent impact or financial audit.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded recipient acquisition closed. Root read the retained 26-page annual report text in full and visually inspected PDF24 and25 of cma-annual2024-250226.pdf. The latter supplies actual chart alignment and complete professional names. These are CMA&#x27;s own retrospective statements, not an independent impact or financial audit.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-organization-discloses\">What the organization discloses</h2>\n<p>The [2024 annual report](http[local research file] PDF24, presents a funding pie with major donors59, foundation grants30 and individual donors11. The numbers sum to100 and the graphic represents shares; the page does not expressly print a percent sign, dollar denominator, accounting basis or donor-category definitions. Its major-donor slice is the largest. A separate individual-giving chart divides Checkmates60 and one-time small donors40. Do not confuse the charts or assign60 percent of total funding to monthly donors. It reports490 recurring donors, two new major donors, one new institutional donor, and foundation support in the USA and Denmark. It names neither the major donors nor the Danish foundation on this page. No individual concentration, absolute gift amount or donor condition follows from those shares.</p>\n<p>PDF25 names founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi as board co-chairs, alongside Zach Edwards, Sabrina Hersi Issa, David Carroll and Dr. Joan Donovan. The team includes Arielle Garcia as COO and Sarah K. Wiley as director of policy. This is a historical organizational roster, not proof of current offices, independent directors under tax definitions, donor appointment rights or a voting agreement. PDF25 is visibly readable; the extracted text truncates several names and titles, so the visual takes precedence.</p>\n<p>Read as a whole, the report describes resources supporting research, communication, industry engagement and public policy together. PDF13 says its trial resources supported inquiries and publisher litigation and informed investors; PDF20 claims briefings, appearances, drafting and coalition work; PDF21 claims its recommendations entered UN information-integrity principles. Those are explicit claims about the intended pathways of influence. They do not authenticate each causal success or demonstrate that funders picked those tactics. PDF16 also attacks the reliability and intrusiveness of advertising data, while PDF17 advocates advertiser visibility and placement choices. Its stated programme therefore cannot simply be equated with support for pervasive personal identification.</p>\n<p>The other retained annual-report original has identical extracted PDF24 content. No canonical-version or whole-document equivalence determination is made from the two filenames. Both originals remain preserved. No contracts, donor letters, internal board minutes, bank transactions or complete audited accounts were obtained.</p>\n<h2 id=\"recipient-filing-discovery-with-its-source-limit\">Recipient filing discovery, with its source limit</h2>\n<p>[ProPublica&#x27;s IRS-derived profile](http[local research file] read at FY2024 and2023, reports EIN87-1895699, 2024 revenueUSD1,461,222, expensesUSD2,055,146 and net assetsUSD572,856, versus2023 revenueUSD2,159,795, expensesUSD1,722,154 and net assetsUSD1,166,780. It reports2024 contributionsUSD1,457,471. These figures are accepted only as that provider&#x27;s extracted filing data, pending inspection of the actual return. They suggest a materially different accounting picture from a simple growth narrative, but cannot establish a liquidity crisis, cash runway, today&#x27;s finances or a motive for February2025 advocacy. Net assets are not equivalent to cash. A zero executive-compensation summary category is not evidence that officers were unpaid; the same profile lists officer compensation.</p>\n<p>The linked full-filing reader delivered a reconstruction shell, not the actual form. Its XML reader returned cache miss; one ordinary GET returned403 and was closed. The response bytes are explicitly a security page, not XML. Philanthropy.org&#x27;s reader failed; its indexed summary independently repeats some figures, but its ordinary GET returned403 and was closed. CauseIQ&#x27;s direct reader was robots-denied and was not retried. No provider was counted as an independent underlying financial return merely because it republished the same IRS data. No full return, public ScheduleB, donor-advised grant identity or financial-statement audit was acquired. The indexed Fidelity figure remains discovery and does not identify an underlying donor. Further acquisition on these routes is closed in this run.</p>\n<h2 id=\"combined-donor-comparison\">Combined donor comparison</h2>\n<p>Root read donor-resources.md and independently read Ford grant144432&#x27;s primary-reader substantive record. Ford approvedUSD200,000 of general support inOctober2022 forOctober2022–September2023, through Technology and Society. It is approval and term evidence, not cash payment or a2025 campaign earmark. The Democracy Fund paid/future-payment schedule distinctions are useful, but the worker&#x27;s numerical row-alignment caveat remains in force: no new root facsimile check occurred. Neither later cash payments nor future commitments may be added to the Ford approval as a single year&#x27;s recipient revenue. Ford&#x27;s indexedMarch2025 USD400,000 remains discovery only.</p>\n<p>The resource provision is established more strongly than its conditions. General support can sustain personnel and strategic capacity even without a project earmark; it cannot, on these records, identify the person choosing a legislative target or approving wording. The report&#x27;s major-donor majority makes unidentified gift conditions at least as relevant as the named foundations. Executed awards, instalment schedules, restrictions and board delegation rules would distinguish selection of a mission from direction of a tactic.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-scope\">Custody and scope</h2>\n<p>Annual originals and derivatives are in recipient-captures.json; hashes remain73b946f4338a68819eee15930641ea2b7efe0e2e394455534a54d1fb264ec748 and e1868d673b15a793de5316db99fd9e6d2c9f09d2dc2c34ef3f6069cd984f7619. Actual visual derivatives: annual2024-p24.png and annual2024-p25.png. Root used the already saved pypdf text; an attempted pdftotext command was unavailable and abandoned, with no claimed output. Session67515 finished exit0 and supplied page lengths plus both PDF24 texts. recipient-return-capture.json and philanthropy-recipient-capture.json label blocked transport. ProPublica primary profile reader turn1552view0; reconstructed-form shell turn1553view0; Ford primary reader turn1556view0. No visible UI, outreach or packaging occurred.</p>",
        "path": "cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09/recipient-resources.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-cma2024"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded recipient acquisition closed. Root read the retained 26-page annual report text in full and visually inspected PDF24 and25 of cma-annual2024-250226.pdf. The latter supplies actual chart alignment and complete professional names. These are CMA's own retrospective statements, not an independent impact or financial audit.\n\n## What the organization discloses\n\nThe 2024 annual report (see source references) PDF24, presents a funding pie with major donors59, foundation grants30 and individual donors11. The numbers sum to100 and the graphic represents shares; the page does not expressly print a percent sign, dollar denominator, accounting basis or donor-category definitions. Its major-donor slice is the largest. A separate individual-giving chart divides Checkmates60 and one-time small donors40. Do not confuse the charts or assign60 percent of total funding to monthly donors. It reports490 recurring donors, two new major donors, one new institutional donor, and foundation support in the USA and Denmark. It names neither the major donors nor the Danish foundation on this page. No individual concentration, absolute gift amount or donor condition follows from those shares.\n\nPDF25 names founders Claire Atkin and Nandini Jammi as board co-chairs, alongside Zach Edwards, Sabrina Hersi Issa, David Carroll and Dr. Joan Donovan. The team includes Arielle Garcia as COO and Sarah K. Wiley as director of policy. This is a historical organizational roster, not proof of current offices, independent directors under tax definitions, donor appointment rights or a voting agreement. PDF25 is visibly readable; the extracted text truncates several names and titles, so the visual takes precedence.\n\nRead as a whole, the report describes resources supporting research, communication, industry engagement and public policy together. PDF13 says its trial resources supported inquiries and publisher litigation and informed investors; PDF20 claims briefings, appearances, drafting and coalition work; PDF21 claims its recommendations entered UN information-integrity principles. Those are explicit claims about the intended pathways of influence. They do not authenticate each causal success or demonstrate that funders picked those tactics. PDF16 also attacks the reliability and intrusiveness of advertising data, while PDF17 advocates advertiser visibility and placement choices. Its stated programme therefore cannot simply be equated with support for pervasive personal identification.\n\nThe other retained annual-report original has identical extracted PDF24 content. No canonical-version or whole-document equivalence determination is made from the two filenames. Both originals remain preserved. No contracts, donor letters, internal board minutes, bank transactions or complete audited accounts were obtained.\n\n## Recipient filing discovery, with its source limit\n\nProPublica's IRS-derived profile (see source references) read at FY2024 and2023, reports EIN87-1895699, 2024 revenueUSD1,461,222, expensesUSD2,055,146 and net assetsUSD572,856, versus2023 revenueUSD2,159,795, expensesUSD1,722,154 and net assetsUSD1,166,780. It reports2024 contributionsUSD1,457,471. These figures are accepted only as that provider's extracted filing data, pending inspection of the actual return. They suggest a materially different accounting picture from a simple growth narrative, but cannot establish a liquidity crisis, cash runway, today's finances or a motive for February2025 advocacy. Net assets are not equivalent to cash. A zero executive-compensation summary category is not evidence that officers were unpaid; the same profile lists officer compensation.\n\nThe linked full-filing reader delivered a reconstruction shell, not the actual form. Its XML reader returned cache miss; one ordinary GET returned403 and was closed. The response bytes are explicitly a security page, not XML. Philanthropy.org's reader failed; its indexed summary independently repeats some figures, but its ordinary GET returned403 and was closed. CauseIQ's direct reader was robots-denied and was not retried. No provider was counted as an independent underlying financial return merely because it republished the same IRS data. No full return, public ScheduleB, donor-advised grant identity or financial-statement audit was acquired. The indexed Fidelity figure remains discovery and does not identify an underlying donor. Further acquisition on these routes is closed in this run.\n\n## Combined donor comparison\n\nRoot read donor-resources.md and independently read Ford grant144432's primary-reader substantive record. Ford approvedUSD200,000 of general support inOctober2022 forOctober2022–September2023, through Technology and Society. It is approval and term evidence, not cash payment or a2025 campaign earmark. The Democracy Fund paid/future-payment schedule distinctions are useful, but the worker's numerical row-alignment caveat remains in force: no new root facsimile check occurred. Neither later cash payments nor future commitments may be added to the Ford approval as a single year's recipient revenue. Ford's indexedMarch2025 USD400,000 remains discovery only.\n\nThe resource provision is established more strongly than its conditions. General support can sustain personnel and strategic capacity even without a project earmark; it cannot, on these records, identify the person choosing a legislative target or approving wording. The report's major-donor majority makes unidentified gift conditions at least as relevant as the named foundations. Executed awards, instalment schedules, restrictions and board delegation rules would distinguish selection of a mission from direction of a tactic.\n\n## Custody and scope\n\nAnnual originals and derivatives are in recipient-captures.json; hashes remain73b946f4338a68819eee15930641ea2b7efe0e2e394455534a54d1fb264ec748 and e1868d673b15a793de5316db99fd9e6d2c9f09d2dc2c34ef3f6069cd984f7619. Actual visual derivatives: annual2024-p24.png and annual2024-p25.png. Root used the already saved pypdf text; an attempted pdftotext command was unavailable and abandoned, with no claimed output. Session67515 finished exit0 and supplied page lengths plus both PDF24 texts. recipient-return-capture.json and philanthropy-recipient-capture.json label blocked transport. ProPublica primary profile reader turn1552view0; reconstructed-form shell turn1553view0; Ford primary reader turn1556view0. No visible UI, outreach or packaging occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/cma-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-resources.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority",
        "title": "Operation Creative: police classification, advertiser choice and list correction",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet establishes a dated public procedure and a later procurement specification, with attributed delivery accounts. It does not certify the currently deployed portal or a September 2026 operating policy. No operational list, account, form, target website or gated tender was accessed.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet establishes a dated public procedure and a later procurement specification, with attributed delivery accounts. It does not certify the currently deployed portal or a September 2026 operating policy. No operational list, account, form, target website or gated tender was accessed.</p>\n<p>The decisive link is an assessment by police between a rightsholder&#x27;s evidence and a list distributed for advertising decisions. The strongest acquired safeguard is an express opportunity to challenge police action and immediate removal when evidence shows that the site no longer commits offences. The unresolved step is what happens to decisions already made by recipients when an entry changes. Funding for capacity does not by itself give a contributor the power to approve a listing.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-disclosed-rule-and-its-limits\">The disclosed rule and its limits</h2>\n<p>[College of Policing FOIA-2021-094](http[local research file] response dated <strong>17 September 2021</strong>, contains an embedded <em>Policing Fraud</em> document labelled <strong>“Revised 070119 MJB”</strong>. Preserve that literal revision identifier; a separate adoption date and continuing application in 2026 were not established. Original retained as <code>list-college-foi2021.pdf</code>; PDF 37–39 / printed 25–27 is the complete Operation Creative case study. PDF 38 was visually checked.</p>\n<p>The procedure requires PIPCU to assess investigation quality, lawful evidence and a rightsholder/nominee statement meeting a standard sufficient to support prosecution. Qualifying referrals can be distributed to advertising businesses. The Head of Unit determines tactics case by case. Website operators may challenge police activity; evidence of cessation of offences triggers immediate removal. Police first contact operators, offer a route to legitimate operation through rights associations, and review again if positive contact fails. Payment-service withdrawal is described as a request to the provider or merchant bank. It is not a payment-provider command conferred by this document.</p>\n<p>The preceding text cautions against unlawful use of compulsory powers solely for disruption. The case study does not specify prior court adjudication as an inclusion condition. That is a description of this procedure, not a comprehensive opinion about legal powers. It provides no fixed recurring review interval, response deadline, independent merits reviewer or recipient-wide correction instruction. Its cessation wording also does not spell out a separate mistaken-original-inclusion test. The general challenge opportunity should not be erased because those details are absent.</p>\n<p>The FOI letter&#x27;s own 40-working-day review route concerns access to information, not IWL inclusion. Likewise, Ashiko&#x27;s separately acquired DCI approval rule is not imported here. The stated Creative decision actor is the Head of Unit.</p>\n<h2 id=\"later-public-portal-specification-locates-admission-rights\">Later public portal specification locates admission rights</h2>\n<p>[Find a Tender notice 012517-2024](http[local research file] published <strong>17 April 2024 at 14:38</strong>, is a City of London Corporation contract notice, not an executed operating manual. PDF 4, section II.2.4, describes the proposed allocation:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Actor</th>\n<th>Specified role</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Copyright holders and representatives</td>\n<td>Submit domains with supporting evidence</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Police officers as administrators</td>\n<td>Review and accept or reject submissions</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Investigators</td>\n<td>Submit cases and see limited data</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Users</td>\n<td>View some data without editing it and download IWL domains</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Two administrator levels are described as desirable. This supports a police-controlled approval design; it does not prove permissions were implemented, that every applicant is admitted, or that the software supplier decides infringement. The notice provides no new challenge procedure or correction-propagation rule. Its High Court procurement-review section concerns the tender, not website operators&#x27; list appeals. The full technical pack expressly requires an NDA; it was not requested.</p>\n<p>The complete official-reader notice is retained in <code>list-tender-and-award.reader.txt</code>; original GET returned 403. The related award PDF, [027681-2024](http[local research file] failed through both the reader and ordinary GET. Its search-only supplier/value details are not adopted. A separate 2025 procurement search result is likewise only a lead, not proof of the same contract or deployed system. No failed route was retried. The tender&#x27;s inconsistent annual-versus-total value wording was inspected but no budget amount is needed for this authority conclusion.</p>\n<h2 id=\"attributed-referrals-and-effects\">Attributed referrals and effects</h2>\n<p>The retained [IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018/19](http[local research file] PDF 59 / printed 55, supplies an operational account: a referral is followed by a cease-and-desist notice and attempted contact before listing. It dates the IWL&#x27;s creation to 2014 and reports 1,643 websites recorded by April 2019, alongside a separate 1,995 suspended since creation. Those are different measures.</p>\n<p>The <strong>PRS for Music contribution</strong>, PDF 113 / printed 109, reports its Rights Protection Unit submitting <strong>138 website referrals</strong>. This appears in the2018/19 report, but the Operation Creative paragraph does not specify the counting period; nearby2018 dates concern separate work. This establishes PRS&#x27;s attributed exercised supply of referrals. It does not show that all 138 were accepted or identify the advertisements removed because of each referral. Its surrounding MAPS/search/app achievements are different channels and must not be counted as IWL results.</p>\n<p>The retained [2022–2027 counter-infringement strategy](http[local research file] “Internet/e-commerce”, explicitly calls industry intelligence the main referral source and describes sharing the IWL to disrupt advertising revenue. Its <strong>5,008 takedowns since 2014</strong> is attributed to the wider collaborative operation, which includes multiple tactics. It is not a measured causal effect of list inclusion alone.</p>\n<p>[City of London Police, 6 February 2023](http[local research file] reports White Bullet research finding a <strong>58% decrease in UK advertising on IWL websites between January and December 2022</strong>, and an estimated <strong>GBP 6 million decrease in advertising revenue from UK traffic</strong> over that period. The office presents this as operational success; White Bullet&#x27;s CEO also speaks as a collaborator. The underlying study, sampling, list-composition changes and counterfactual were not acquired. Preserve this as a police-published, supplier-attributed estimate, not observed cash withheld, seized money or proof that the IWL alone caused the change. The article separately reports 750 subscribers and 682 domains suspended in 2022; subscriber access, listing and suspension remain distinct outcomes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-sequence-establishes\">What the sequence establishes</h2>\n<p>Candidate directional relations for later review are: rightsholder/nominee to PIPCU, evidential referral; PIPCU to referred domain, quality assessment; police administrator to portal submission, proposed accept/reject right; Head of Unit to operational tactics, dated decision authority; PIPCU to advertising recipients, distribution for action; website operator to PIPCU, challenge opportunity; PIPCU to list entry, conditional immediate removal; PRS to PIPCU, reported 138 referrals; White Bullet to police announcement, attributed measurement input. None is a new case addition.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to a simple “industry dictates the list” interpretation is substantive police screening followed by recipients&#x27; separate choices. The published rules support that formal distinction; their practical quality cannot be inferred from the rules alone. Conversely, the presence of screening and a challenge promise does not establish that reviews are fast, independent or consistently reflected downstream.</p>\n<p>A finite next discriminator is a current public IWL operating procedure or redacted inclusion/challenge decision with timestamps, reasons, reviewer, removal notice and recipient notification. The likely holder is PIPCU/City of London Police; relevant product evidence would be an accepted technical specification or change-event protocol. No claim is made that a particular unpublished document exists. This would distinguish effective correction from list-only deletion and establish whether the dated safeguards remain operative.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-exact-scope\">Custody and exact scope</h2>\n<p><code>list-captures.json</code> contains original/derivative hashes, URLs, dates, acquisition outcomes and scoped reads. The College original is SHA256 <code>245cd690a2643290ec29690933b65833b3283fb11687282f9d4083f0357ddf76</code>. Reused 2019 report and 2022 strategy originals remain at their prior paths with hashes <code>e0b6e4b753ece534e35a20b46cf2aeeb4b147588e99576f746f083c621bade97</code> and <code>9dcb6d69ad37942b0b4005543be05e9f4561eb854659d149e0f95510067e0654</code>. This run freshly read the previously excluded Creative passages; it does not relabel old captures as new acquisitions.</p>\n<p>College scope: PDF 1–3 cover/access review, PDF 13 contents/version, PDF 37–39 case study and adjacent caution; PDF 12 incidental; visual PDF 38. Report scope: complete PDF 59 and 113, incidental PDF 75; the unrelated activities on those pages were not adopted as IWL evidence. Strategy scope: original HTML Internet/e-commerce section through the Creative paragraph. Tender scope: full public 10-page reader, especially II.2.4; no technical pack. Police announcement scope: complete substantive official-reader lines 50–67 including date and closing figures; no underlying White Bullet study. Neither the 159-page College bundle nor either long report was read in full.</p>\n<p>Searches were confined to the exact operation/list, challenge/review and official portal notice. No newer public review cadence or exercised correction case was located in this finite pass. That is a scoped gap, not proof no procedure or correction exists. Acquisition closed before any supplier-contract, operational-list or wider advertising branch.</p>",
        "path": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09/list-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-creative-guidance",
          "w30-class-s-creative-report2019",
          "w30-class-s-creative-portal",
          "w30-class-s-creative-metric"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet establishes a dated public procedure and a later procurement specification, with attributed delivery accounts. It does not certify the currently deployed portal or a September 2026 operating policy. No operational list, account, form, target website or gated tender was accessed.\n\nThe decisive link is an assessment by police between a rightsholder's evidence and a list distributed for advertising decisions. The strongest acquired safeguard is an express opportunity to challenge police action and immediate removal when evidence shows that the site no longer commits offences. The unresolved step is what happens to decisions already made by recipients when an entry changes. Funding for capacity does not by itself give a contributor the power to approve a listing.\n\n## The disclosed rule and its limits\n\nCollege of Policing FOIA-2021-094 (see source references) response dated **17 September 2021**, contains an embedded *Policing Fraud* document labelled **“Revised 070119 MJB”**. Preserve that literal revision identifier; a separate adoption date and continuing application in 2026 were not established. Original retained as `list-college-foi2021.pdf`; PDF 37–39 / printed 25–27 is the complete Operation Creative case study. PDF 38 was visually checked.\n\nThe procedure requires PIPCU to assess investigation quality, lawful evidence and a rightsholder/nominee statement meeting a standard sufficient to support prosecution. Qualifying referrals can be distributed to advertising businesses. The Head of Unit determines tactics case by case. Website operators may challenge police activity; evidence of cessation of offences triggers immediate removal. Police first contact operators, offer a route to legitimate operation through rights associations, and review again if positive contact fails. Payment-service withdrawal is described as a request to the provider or merchant bank. It is not a payment-provider command conferred by this document.\n\nThe preceding text cautions against unlawful use of compulsory powers solely for disruption. The case study does not specify prior court adjudication as an inclusion condition. That is a description of this procedure, not a comprehensive opinion about legal powers. It provides no fixed recurring review interval, response deadline, independent merits reviewer or recipient-wide correction instruction. Its cessation wording also does not spell out a separate mistaken-original-inclusion test. The general challenge opportunity should not be erased because those details are absent.\n\nThe FOI letter's own 40-working-day review route concerns access to information, not IWL inclusion. Likewise, Ashiko's separately acquired DCI approval rule is not imported here. The stated Creative decision actor is the Head of Unit.\n\n## Later public portal specification locates admission rights\n\nFind a Tender notice 012517-2024 (see source references) published **17 April 2024 at 14:38**, is a City of London Corporation contract notice, not an executed operating manual. PDF 4, section II.2.4, describes the proposed allocation:\n\n| Actor | Specified role |\n| --- | --- |\n| Copyright holders and representatives | Submit domains with supporting evidence |\n| Police officers as administrators | Review and accept or reject submissions |\n| Investigators | Submit cases and see limited data |\n| Users | View some data without editing it and download IWL domains |\n\nTwo administrator levels are described as desirable. This supports a police-controlled approval design; it does not prove permissions were implemented, that every applicant is admitted, or that the software supplier decides infringement. The notice provides no new challenge procedure or correction-propagation rule. Its High Court procurement-review section concerns the tender, not website operators' list appeals. The full technical pack expressly requires an NDA; it was not requested.\n\nThe complete official-reader notice is retained in `list-tender-and-award.reader.txt`; original GET returned 403. The related award PDF, 027681-2024 (see source references) failed through both the reader and ordinary GET. Its search-only supplier/value details are not adopted. A separate 2025 procurement search result is likewise only a lead, not proof of the same contract or deployed system. No failed route was retried. The tender's inconsistent annual-versus-total value wording was inspected but no budget amount is needed for this authority conclusion.\n\n## Attributed referrals and effects\n\nThe retained IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018/19 (see source references) PDF 59 / printed 55, supplies an operational account: a referral is followed by a cease-and-desist notice and attempted contact before listing. It dates the IWL's creation to 2014 and reports 1,643 websites recorded by April 2019, alongside a separate 1,995 suspended since creation. Those are different measures.\n\nThe **PRS for Music contribution**, PDF 113 / printed 109, reports its Rights Protection Unit submitting **138 website referrals**. This appears in the2018/19 report, but the Operation Creative paragraph does not specify the counting period; nearby2018 dates concern separate work. This establishes PRS's attributed exercised supply of referrals. It does not show that all 138 were accepted or identify the advertisements removed because of each referral. Its surrounding MAPS/search/app achievements are different channels and must not be counted as IWL results.\n\nThe retained 2022–2027 counter-infringement strategy (see source references) “Internet/e-commerce”, explicitly calls industry intelligence the main referral source and describes sharing the IWL to disrupt advertising revenue. Its **5,008 takedowns since 2014** is attributed to the wider collaborative operation, which includes multiple tactics. It is not a measured causal effect of list inclusion alone.\n\nCity of London Police, 6 February 2023 (see source references) reports White Bullet research finding a **58% decrease in UK advertising on IWL websites between January and December 2022**, and an estimated **GBP 6 million decrease in advertising revenue from UK traffic** over that period. The office presents this as operational success; White Bullet's CEO also speaks as a collaborator. The underlying study, sampling, list-composition changes and counterfactual were not acquired. Preserve this as a police-published, supplier-attributed estimate, not observed cash withheld, seized money or proof that the IWL alone caused the change. The article separately reports 750 subscribers and 682 domains suspended in 2022; subscriber access, listing and suspension remain distinct outcomes.\n\n## What the sequence establishes\n\nCandidate directional relations for later review are: rightsholder/nominee to PIPCU, evidential referral; PIPCU to referred domain, quality assessment; police administrator to portal submission, proposed accept/reject right; Head of Unit to operational tactics, dated decision authority; PIPCU to advertising recipients, distribution for action; website operator to PIPCU, challenge opportunity; PIPCU to list entry, conditional immediate removal; PRS to PIPCU, reported 138 referrals; White Bullet to police announcement, attributed measurement input. None is a new case addition.\n\nThe strongest rival to a simple “industry dictates the list” interpretation is substantive police screening followed by recipients' separate choices. The published rules support that formal distinction; their practical quality cannot be inferred from the rules alone. Conversely, the presence of screening and a challenge promise does not establish that reviews are fast, independent or consistently reflected downstream.\n\nA finite next discriminator is a current public IWL operating procedure or redacted inclusion/challenge decision with timestamps, reasons, reviewer, removal notice and recipient notification. The likely holder is PIPCU/City of London Police; relevant product evidence would be an accepted technical specification or change-event protocol. No claim is made that a particular unpublished document exists. This would distinguish effective correction from list-only deletion and establish whether the dated safeguards remain operative.\n\n## Custody and exact scope\n\n`list-captures.json` contains original/derivative hashes, URLs, dates, acquisition outcomes and scoped reads. The College original is SHA256 `245cd690a2643290ec29690933b65833b3283fb11687282f9d4083f0357ddf76`. Reused 2019 report and 2022 strategy originals remain at their prior paths with hashes `e0b6e4b753ece534e35a20b46cf2aeeb4b147588e99576f746f083c621bade97` and `9dcb6d69ad37942b0b4005543be05e9f4561eb854659d149e0f95510067e0654`. This run freshly read the previously excluded Creative passages; it does not relabel old captures as new acquisitions.\n\nCollege scope: PDF 1–3 cover/access review, PDF 13 contents/version, PDF 37–39 case study and adjacent caution; PDF 12 incidental; visual PDF 38. Report scope: complete PDF 59 and 113, incidental PDF 75; the unrelated activities on those pages were not adopted as IWL evidence. Strategy scope: original HTML Internet/e-commerce section through the Creative paragraph. Tender scope: full public 10-page reader, especially II.2.4; no technical pack. Police announcement scope: complete substantive official-reader lines 50–67 including date and closing figures; no underlying White Bullet study. Neither the 159-page College bundle nor either long report was read in full.\n\nSearches were confined to the exact operation/list, challenge/review and official portal notice. No newer public review cadence or exercised correction case was located in this finite pass. That is a scoped gap, not proof no procedure or correction exists. Acquisition closed before any supplier-contract, operational-list or wider advertising branch.\n",
        "file": "research/creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use",
        "title": "Advertising recipients: recommended contracts, licence duties and commercial list delivery",
        "description": "9September2026. Root acquisition CLOSED at the recipient marketplace/rule breakpoint. This packet connects documented sources of pressure and offered integrations without treating every list as a court finding or every available control as executed action.",
        "html": "<p>9September2026. Root acquisition CLOSED at the recipient marketplace/rule breakpoint. This packet connects documented sources of pressure and offered integrations without treating every list as a court finding or every available control as executed action.</p>\n<h2 id=\"iab-uk-a-recommended-contract-and-workflow-route\">IAB UK: a recommended contract and workflow route</h2>\n<p>The undated live [IAB IWL guide](http[local research file] says PIPCU established the list with IAB UK, IPA, ISBA and rightsholders, and calls it police-verified. It describes an API, encourages advertisers/agencies/intermediaries to use the list in buying/selling/trading, and explicitly recommends incorporating its data into contracts and processes. Access requires requesting PIPCU authorization and authenticated users. No access was requested. This is industry guidance promoting contract adoption; no executed advertiser contract is supplied, and the word new beside API does not date a2026 launch. Police review and exact rights remain Carver&#x27;s distinct source lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"gambling-a-licence-obligation-with-a-contract-requirement\">Gambling: a licence obligation with a contract requirement</h2>\n<p>The current official [LCCP16.1.1](http[local research file] heading through its complete three-part condition, applies to all licences. It requires operators to avoid placing digital ads on sites providing unauthorized access to copyrighted content; take all reasonable steps regarding relevant contracted third parties; and ensure contracts enable prompt termination when the licensee reasonably considers that a third party placed such ads. The termination capacity is subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is a requirement to hold a contractual right, not an unconditional order to exercise it every time a list changes. The condition itself neither names IWL nor makes inability to verify customer identity the trigger.</p>\n<p>The regulator&#x27;s [13June2017 announcement](http[local research file] expressly links OperationCreative to the licence condition introduced the preceding October and encourages operators to obtain IWL access. It reports an87% fall in gambling ads on infringing sites over the preceding12months. The historical start is the regulator&#x27;s account; current wording was separately read. The percentage is an attributed aggregate outcome, without acquired sample/method/counterfactual or operator-level records. No revenue total follows from an ad-count percentage. This establishes a sector-specific route from regulatory responsibility to private contracts, with the list promoted as an aid, rather than a universal legal force attaching to list membership.</p>\n<h2 id=\"agency-practice-multiple-list-sources-and-a-payment-limitation\">Agency practice: multiple list sources and a payment limitation</h2>\n<p>[Thinkbox&#x27;s January2018 parliamentary supplementary evidence ADV0038](http[local research file] read in full, reproduces accounts from anonymous AgenciesA/B/C. A describes combining PIPCU, private research, client fraud teams and internal vetting; B describes contractual approved-placement requirements, manual vetting, real-time URL/app matching and an always-on exclusion list with PIPCU among its sources. These are agency statements mediated by Thinkbox, not named client contracts or independently observed deployments. Do not identify the anonymous firms from the vendors they mention.</p>\n<p>The distinction between ad blocking and revenue denial is material. Thinkbox&#x27;s own paragraphs14–15 question effectiveness and say some verification happens after purchase, allowing payment despite a blank replacement ad. This is an attributed limitation, not independent transaction evidence. It nevertheless defeats an inference that every blocked creative necessarily stops every corresponding payment. AgencyA also reports investigating inconsistencies and updating lists; this is not a worked publisher challenge or recipient-wide correction trace.</p>\n<h2 id=\"white-bullet-and-peer39-official-data-alongside-proprietary-assessment\">White Bullet and Peer39: official data alongside proprietary assessment</h2>\n<p>White Bullet&#x27;s [25June2018 announcement](http[local research file] describes signing the EU advertising/IP memorandum and offers two different data products. Its GlobalPiracyIndex is said to combine court-order sites and infringement-list initiatives worldwide. Its separate IPIIndex is advertised as assessing sites beyond court/enforcement adjudication, using machine learning and specialist criteria. These are vendor claims, not an audited database, proven PIPCU-specific feed or a newly acquired EU agreement. No operational list was opened and marketing accuracy/completeness claims are not adopted.</p>\n<p>The vendor&#x27;s [5May2021 WIPO announcement](http[local research file] calls WhiteBullet a WIPOALERT member and describes official national-list information alongside its own tracked content/risk assessments. This supports an attributed membership/combined-offering account, not a dated executed WIPO licence or item-by-item ingestion proof. Linnaeus separately supplies WIPO&#x27;s actual public rules; any differences in scope prevail over a broad promotional description.</p>\n<p>Its <a>26May2021 Peer39 announcement</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"missing-discriminating-evidence-and-a-closed-procurement-lead\">Missing discriminating evidence and a closed procurement lead</h2>\n<p>The next proof would be a dated recipient agreement or actual configuration identifying which source lists are selected, the trigger for blocking/cessation, pre-bid versus post-purchase placement, and a correction or reconciliation record. A list-entry reversal alone cannot prove that an advertiser resumed spending. A named vendor or offered integration is a real commercial connection but is weaker than an executed case.</p>\n<p>Discovery also returned a [D3 procurement record](http[local research file] identifying FTS037229-2026 / ocds-h6vhtk-0689ed, a reported WhiteBullet advertising-monitoring award ofGBP74520. That amount, award and scope remain a THIRD-PARTY LEAD. The exact official notice reader failed and one ordinary GET returned403; neither original nor primary readable notice was acquired. No signed contract, payment or funding-to-metric claim follows. The Stotles lead route also failed and is closed. This is a named record target for a future new credible source, not permission to keep trying the same failures. No procurement award from this lead is promoted into the accepted graph.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-actual-scope\">Custody and actual scope</h2>\n<p>Two original HTMLs are retained: recipient-iab.html SHA25635188162720124f1a7b7113f2ead35ce9633023d72f86c2a2637b67647b778bc, and recipient-peer39-marketplace.html SHA256a5ed833b584f5744cc4fe7aca6898bd5b1c15274f65b504a96b6b38136b32660. Root fully read IAB&#x27;s four substantive sections from its reader and then a scoped original extract; initial whole-page output truncated and was replaced by that complete section read. Root read Peer39&#x27;s substantive page through its reader and verified original heading/marketplace description/WhiteBullet card. No images or forms were used.</p>\n<p>GC condition/news, Thinkbox and the2018WhiteBullet ordinary GETs returned403; error files are not originals. Their successful official/vendor readers supplied the scoped text. The two2021WhiteBullet articles were fully read through their vendor reader, excluding related-post snippets/marketing footer as new research; no repeated GET to the already failing host. Reader-based summaries and locators are in recipient-reader-scopes.json; these are derivatives, not facsimiles. The notice failed both primary routes. Exact status/hash facts are in recipient-captures-initial.json and recipient-peer39-capture.json. Search discovery included unsuccessful named-vendor/contract queries and noisy unrelated acronym results; those were excluded, not evidence of absence. No operational list, account, advertising endpoint, contact, purchase, public release, case edit, ZIP or visible app was used. Acquisition closed for independent review and combined forest.</p>",
        "path": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09/recipient-use.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iab-guide",
          "w30-class-s-gambling-condition",
          "w30-class-s-gambling2017",
          "w30-class-s-thinkbox2018",
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet2018",
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet-wipo",
          "w30-class-s-whitebullet-peer",
          "w30-class-s-peer39"
        ],
        "markdown": "9September2026. Root acquisition CLOSED at the recipient marketplace/rule breakpoint. This packet connects documented sources of pressure and offered integrations without treating every list as a court finding or every available control as executed action.\n\n## IAB UK: a recommended contract and workflow route\n\nThe undated live IAB IWL guide (see source references) says PIPCU established the list with IAB UK, IPA, ISBA and rightsholders, and calls it police-verified. It describes an API, encourages advertisers/agencies/intermediaries to use the list in buying/selling/trading, and explicitly recommends incorporating its data into contracts and processes. Access requires requesting PIPCU authorization and authenticated users. No access was requested. This is industry guidance promoting contract adoption; no executed advertiser contract is supplied, and the word new beside API does not date a2026 launch. Police review and exact rights remain Carver's distinct source lane.\n\n## Gambling: a licence obligation with a contract requirement\n\nThe current official LCCP16.1.1 (see source references) heading through its complete three-part condition, applies to all licences. It requires operators to avoid placing digital ads on sites providing unauthorized access to copyrighted content; take all reasonable steps regarding relevant contracted third parties; and ensure contracts enable prompt termination when the licensee reasonably considers that a third party placed such ads. The termination capacity is subject to applicable dispute-resolution provisions. This is a requirement to hold a contractual right, not an unconditional order to exercise it every time a list changes. The condition itself neither names IWL nor makes inability to verify customer identity the trigger.\n\nThe regulator's 13June2017 announcement (see source references) expressly links OperationCreative to the licence condition introduced the preceding October and encourages operators to obtain IWL access. It reports an87% fall in gambling ads on infringing sites over the preceding12months. The historical start is the regulator's account; current wording was separately read. The percentage is an attributed aggregate outcome, without acquired sample/method/counterfactual or operator-level records. No revenue total follows from an ad-count percentage. This establishes a sector-specific route from regulatory responsibility to private contracts, with the list promoted as an aid, rather than a universal legal force attaching to list membership.\n\n## Agency practice: multiple list sources and a payment limitation\n\nThinkbox's January2018 parliamentary supplementary evidence ADV0038 (see source references) read in full, reproduces accounts from anonymous AgenciesA/B/C. A describes combining PIPCU, private research, client fraud teams and internal vetting; B describes contractual approved-placement requirements, manual vetting, real-time URL/app matching and an always-on exclusion list with PIPCU among its sources. These are agency statements mediated by Thinkbox, not named client contracts or independently observed deployments. Do not identify the anonymous firms from the vendors they mention.\n\nThe distinction between ad blocking and revenue denial is material. Thinkbox's own paragraphs14–15 question effectiveness and say some verification happens after purchase, allowing payment despite a blank replacement ad. This is an attributed limitation, not independent transaction evidence. It nevertheless defeats an inference that every blocked creative necessarily stops every corresponding payment. AgencyA also reports investigating inconsistencies and updating lists; this is not a worked publisher challenge or recipient-wide correction trace.\n\n## White Bullet and Peer39: official data alongside proprietary assessment\n\nWhite Bullet's 25June2018 announcement (see source references) describes signing the EU advertising/IP memorandum and offers two different data products. Its GlobalPiracyIndex is said to combine court-order sites and infringement-list initiatives worldwide. Its separate IPIIndex is advertised as assessing sites beyond court/enforcement adjudication, using machine learning and specialist criteria. These are vendor claims, not an audited database, proven PIPCU-specific feed or a newly acquired EU agreement. No operational list was opened and marketing accuracy/completeness claims are not adopted.\n\nThe vendor's 5May2021 WIPO announcement (see source references) calls WhiteBullet a WIPOALERT member and describes official national-list information alongside its own tracked content/risk assessments. This supports an attributed membership/combined-offering account, not a dated executed WIPO licence or item-by-item ingestion proof. Linnaeus separately supplies WIPO's actual public rules; any differences in scope prevail over a broad promotional description.\n\nIts 26May2021 Peer39 announcement.\n\n## Missing discriminating evidence and a closed procurement lead\n\nThe next proof would be a dated recipient agreement or actual configuration identifying which source lists are selected, the trigger for blocking/cessation, pre-bid versus post-purchase placement, and a correction or reconciliation record. A list-entry reversal alone cannot prove that an advertiser resumed spending. A named vendor or offered integration is a real commercial connection but is weaker than an executed case.\n\nDiscovery also returned a D3 procurement record (see source references) identifying FTS037229-2026 / ocds-h6vhtk-0689ed, a reported WhiteBullet advertising-monitoring award ofGBP74520. That amount, award and scope remain a THIRD-PARTY LEAD. The exact official notice reader failed and one ordinary GET returned403; neither original nor primary readable notice was acquired. No signed contract, payment or funding-to-metric claim follows. The Stotles lead route also failed and is closed. This is a named record target for a future new credible source, not permission to keep trying the same failures. No procurement award from this lead is promoted into the accepted graph.\n\n## Custody and actual scope\n\nTwo original HTMLs are retained: recipient-iab.html SHA25635188162720124f1a7b7113f2ead35ce9633023d72f86c2a2637b67647b778bc, and recipient-peer39-marketplace.html SHA256a5ed833b584f5744cc4fe7aca6898bd5b1c15274f65b504a96b6b38136b32660. Root fully read IAB's four substantive sections from its reader and then a scoped original extract; initial whole-page output truncated and was replaced by that complete section read. Root read Peer39's substantive page through its reader and verified original heading/marketplace description/WhiteBullet card. No images or forms were used.\n\nGC condition/news, Thinkbox and the2018WhiteBullet ordinary GETs returned403; error files are not originals. Their successful official/vendor readers supplied the scoped text. The two2021WhiteBullet articles were fully read through their vendor reader, excluding related-post snippets/marketing footer as new research; no repeated GET to the already failing host. Reader-based summaries and locators are in recipient-reader-scopes.json; these are derivatives, not facsimiles. The notice failed both primary routes. Exact status/hash facts are in recipient-captures-initial.json and recipient-peer39-capture.json. Search discovery included unsuccessful named-vendor/contract queries and noisy unrelated acronym results; those were excluded, not evidence of absence. No operational list, account, advertising endpoint, contact, purchase, public release, case edit, ZIP or visible app was used. Acquisition closed for independent review and combined forest.\n",
        "file": "research/creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-use.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT: contribution, distribution and challenge authority",
        "description": "9 September2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. Five official originals retained; no accounts, applications, list searches, list entries, API calls, operational actions or outreach. No case/atlas/ZIP/current-work/forest edits. This packet establishes a distribution mechanism and its published limits; an actual PIPCU IWL feed into WIPO was not established.",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. Five official originals retained; no accounts, applications, list searches, list entries, API calls, operational actions or outreach. No case/atlas/ZIP/current-work/forest edits. This packet establishes a distribution mechanism and its published limits; an actual PIPCU IWL feed into WIPO was not established.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-distribution-boundary\">The distribution boundary</h2>\n<p>The [current public landing page](http[local research file] says authorized bodies in member states supply lists of websites/apps assessed under national rules. WIPO distributes the information, does not itself determine infringement, and directs listing concerns to the national agency. Advertisers, agencies and technical providers can apply to use aggregated lists in automated advertising systems. This is WIPO&#x27;s undated public description as observed today, not a finding that every listing rests on a final judicial judgment.</p>\n<p>The [public user FAQ](http[local research file] gives actual gatekeeping choices. WIPO may examine a genuine advertising business before approving access. Users can select particular contributors/countries rather than every list; contributors can refuse particular users, although access to all lists is the stated default. Manual download and API access are described. The user agreement is summarized as confining use to preventing misplaced advertising, with best-endeavours confidentiality. Access is currently described as free; this is not evidence of a subsidy amount or paid contract. Contributors remain responsible for accuracy. A described facility notifies contributors when another list deletes a site present on multiple lists. That does not establish automatic deletion from every list or restoration of advertising. No executed agreement, current versioned contractual schedule, recipient refresh deadline or tested runtime was acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-dated-framework-is-explicit-about-suspicion-and-retained-national-authority\">The dated framework is explicit about suspicion and retained national authority</h2>\n<p>[WIPO/ACE/14/9](http[local research file] is prepared by the Secretariat. The current landing links it as its explanation of the original BRIP Database project. Paragraphs9–14 describe contributor Letters of Understanding and user agreements, contributor-controlled lists, advertiser eligibility screening, and retained national review/appeal rights. The inclusion definition is a contributor&#x27;s reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement or facilitation, including outside the contributor&#x27;s territory; WIPO presents itself as a distributor. Paragraph12 describes prompt contributor updates when a national entry is removed. Paragraph20 says advertising users cannot add/remove entries. Paragraph22&#x27;s automated ad-suppression sequence is the preferred implementation, not proof any named recipient deployed it. Paragraphs25–27 describe the2019 startup/test-data stage, not current adoption counts.</p>\n<p>This is the important distinction: a national classification can acquire cross-border commercial reach through a shared feed without becoming a WIPO adjudication. Whether a particular recipient must or chooses to suppress an ad still needs its own applicable instrument. The platform is described as voluntary cooperation; that does not establish that every recipient faces no separate legal or contractual duty.</p>\n<h2 id=\"national-procedures-differ-the-acronym-is-not-an-identity\">National procedures differ; the acronym is not an identity</h2>\n<p>[WIPO&#x27;s contributor-supplied operating-procedures page](http[local research file] undated and observed9September2026, provides two useful contrasts. Brazil&#x27;s table describes rightsholder evidence/notice with a five-day comment opportunity, CCP assessment, SFI approval and CNCP upload. An operator may seek review for an incorrect listing or changed conduct; the stated analysis period is60days. Removal depends on the specified authorities&#x27; review. The underlying executed cooperation agreement and proof of these safeguards in a case were not acquired. Its separate reference to domestic circulation to payment intermediaries must not be treated as WIPO advertising-user permission to freeze bank accounts.</p>\n<p>Japan&#x27;s table identifies CODA, an association formed at the instance of Japanese ministries, using member-company/association data and updates approximately every two months. Its own list is also called the Infringing Website List (IWL). The table supplies criteria but no detailed operator-appeal mechanism. CODA&#x27;s IWL is not PIPCU&#x27;s IWL. The presence of this association also prevents simplification of every contributor into a government ministry. Neither table&#x27;s dated/undated operating summary proves current execution of every step.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-uk-connection-actually-establishes\">What the UK connection actually establishes</h2>\n<p>The2019 framework paragraph3 describes PIPCU&#x27;s IWL as a national precedent: rightsholder evidence verified by police, then shared via a portal. The FAQ likewise cites a2017 OperationCreative effectiveness claim as rationale. Neither passage says PIPCU signed a contributor agreement, uploaded its list or supplied an ongoing WIPO feed. The currently posted procedures page has eight country headings and none for theUK, but it is not established as an exhaustive or current roster. Its omission does not prove non-participation.</p>\n<p>Before acquisition, reused retained2019 IPO report scoped text (../pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09/referral-delivery2019.scoped-derived.txt, OperationCreative section) and the2022 strategy&#x27;s OperationCreative paragraph in referral-strategy2022.html. They describe IWL distribution to advertisers/brands and industry-intelligence input. They do not identify WIPO as the recipient. This was a narrow reread, not a new audit of those reports or their cumulative outcomes. Root&#x27;s separate recipient lane and Carver&#x27;s police lane own named uses and PIPCU process details.</p>\n<p>The defensible relation is PIPCU/IWL -&gt; cited precedent for WIPO&#x27;s coordination project. An operational IWL -&gt; WIPO feed remains OPEN. A signed contributor LoU, official dated admission/upload account or a named recipient&#x27;s explicit feed provenance would change that result. Co-appearance in a blocklist discussion, a shared acronym, or access to both systems does not.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relationships-and-unresolved-records\">Candidate relationships and unresolved records</h2>\n<p>Candidate typed relations, not case additions: WIPO -&gt; advertising users [access approval]; national contributors -&gt; national lists [classification and maintenance]; contributor -&gt; selected user [data-access permission/refusal]; user -&gt; selected national lists [selection]; WIPO -&gt; aggregated distribution service [resource provision]; user -&gt; advertising-placement system [permitted purpose, implemented use requires separate evidence]; affected operator -&gt; national contributor [review route]; national removal -&gt; contributor WIPO update [dated prescribed process]; cross-list removal -&gt; other contributors [published notification capability]. Keep notification, actual propagation and downstream restoration as distinct states.</p>\n<p>The most consequential missing public instruments are a current versioned user agreement/LoU, a cross-border correction/removal propagation requirement, and an exercised correction showing what recipients did after an entry changed. No WIPO-wide challenge tribunal or compensation obligation was found in the finite inspected sources; national remedies remain source-specific. This does not claim that no additional contractual instruments exist.</p>\n<h3 id=\"parked-discovery-only-wipo-alert-pay\">Parked discovery only: WIPO ALERT Pay</h3>\n<p>Exact discovery URL: [WIPO Webcast, Advisory Committee on Enforcement,4June2026 afternoon](http[local research file] Search result title was WIPO Webcast; the URL identifies the session/date. A displayed search extract attributes to a WIPO speaker an update describing WIPO ALERT Pay, a reported pilot with rightsholders/payment providers and movement into development. The full webcast/transcript and underlying report were NOT opened/read, the video was not watched, no original was captured, names/figures/stages were not verified, and no fact or case edge is promoted from it. It is a candidate for the next forest because payment distribution might differ materially from the ad-user agreement. It must not be folded into the present WIPO ALERT rules.</p>\n<h2 id=\"original-custody-and-actual-read-scope\">Original custody and actual read scope</h2>\n<p>AllfivecapturedURLs returned200 on one ordinary publicGET each. Manifest wipo-captures.json records exactURLs, acquisitiontimes, bytecounts, hashes and derivative ancestry. No source-access failure needed recovery in this lane.</p>\n<p><strong>wipo-index.html</strong> — SHA256 <code>39f87737f0633818b2d726aeb24d24081f3883e0d394afad88b37870f1b930dc</code>. Complete substantive public landing text from title through roles/warning/procedures link read via official reader; original DOM inspected for project source href. No database search/API/form/video used. Undated page observed9September2026; latest visible news dates are not publication dates for the page.</p>\n<p><strong>wipo-faq.html</strong> — SHA256 <code>ba3e517615565ef9f865343b45c10698b00bbc17ae24c1481568392bf1bef5f9</code>. Complete substantive FAQ read, including eligibility, listselection/contributoraccess, useagreement/confidentiality/freeaccess, accuracydisclaimer and crosslistdeletionnotice. Undated public account; not an executed useragreement.</p>\n<p><strong>wipo-procedures.html</strong> — SHA256 <code>ab8bb5196d50f0d5664438cd7059020565e056f77e16c383e8d831966f7b7e3f</code>. Country heading inventory inspected; complete Brazil and Japan tables read directly from original. Other country tables not systematically reviewed. These are contributor-supplied summaries hostedbyWIPO, not underlying executed agreements or complete currentnationallegalaudit. Undated; historical officeholder details not promoted ascurrent.</p>\n<p><strong>wipo-project-index.html</strong> — SHA256 <code>a07fe913e2a571051127031b3a6e2b4ed17cbf5f9d56d8f5c7d27ac06ac13d6f</code>. Documentcode/title/publicationdate/preparedbySecretariat/Englishlink verified; navigation not substantive. Publication18June2019.</p>\n<p><strong>wipo-project2019.pdf</strong> — SHA256 <code>103b26be0b382778579688a170db1078f24d462301e50dfef18b56168827f535</code>. Entire8-page substantive text read from officialreader and directoriginalPDF extraction, including background/PIPCUprecedent, paras6-27, LoUs/UserAgreements, sitesofconcern, appeals/updates, country/list controls and testdata/currentstatus. Embedded UI screenshots/figures not independently visually inspected. Source date18June2019; documented design/reportatthatdate, not evidenceofcurrentruntimeexecution.</p>\n<p>Discovery was limited to two initial officialWIPOqueries for rules/agreements, followed by three targeted questions for UK/contributor/appeal joins. Their results led to the current pages and the projectdocument linked byWIPO itself. The 2025EUIPO discussionpaper, Ukraine legislative accounts, WIPO2026report/webcast, secondaryblog and academic results were discoveryonly and did not become findings. No wholesale globalIP survey or underlying national statute/appeal-case acquisition was attempted. Fulltext extraction is not proof of visual inspection or runtime execution. Acquisition closed pending combinedforest.</p>",
        "path": "creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09/wipo-distribution.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-index",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-faq",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-procedures",
          "w30-class-s-wipo2019"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. Five official originals retained; no accounts, applications, list searches, list entries, API calls, operational actions or outreach. No case/atlas/ZIP/current-work/forest edits. This packet establishes a distribution mechanism and its published limits; an actual PIPCU IWL feed into WIPO was not established.\n\n## The distribution boundary\n\nThe current public landing page (see source references) says authorized bodies in member states supply lists of websites/apps assessed under national rules. WIPO distributes the information, does not itself determine infringement, and directs listing concerns to the national agency. Advertisers, agencies and technical providers can apply to use aggregated lists in automated advertising systems. This is WIPO's undated public description as observed today, not a finding that every listing rests on a final judicial judgment.\n\nThe public user FAQ (see source references) gives actual gatekeeping choices. WIPO may examine a genuine advertising business before approving access. Users can select particular contributors/countries rather than every list; contributors can refuse particular users, although access to all lists is the stated default. Manual download and API access are described. The user agreement is summarized as confining use to preventing misplaced advertising, with best-endeavours confidentiality. Access is currently described as free; this is not evidence of a subsidy amount or paid contract. Contributors remain responsible for accuracy. A described facility notifies contributors when another list deletes a site present on multiple lists. That does not establish automatic deletion from every list or restoration of advertising. No executed agreement, current versioned contractual schedule, recipient refresh deadline or tested runtime was acquired.\n\n## The dated framework is explicit about suspicion and retained national authority\n\nWIPO/ACE/14/9 (see source references) is prepared by the Secretariat. The current landing links it as its explanation of the original BRIP Database project. Paragraphs9–14 describe contributor Letters of Understanding and user agreements, contributor-controlled lists, advertiser eligibility screening, and retained national review/appeal rights. The inclusion definition is a contributor's reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement or facilitation, including outside the contributor's territory; WIPO presents itself as a distributor. Paragraph12 describes prompt contributor updates when a national entry is removed. Paragraph20 says advertising users cannot add/remove entries. Paragraph22's automated ad-suppression sequence is the preferred implementation, not proof any named recipient deployed it. Paragraphs25–27 describe the2019 startup/test-data stage, not current adoption counts.\n\nThis is the important distinction: a national classification can acquire cross-border commercial reach through a shared feed without becoming a WIPO adjudication. Whether a particular recipient must or chooses to suppress an ad still needs its own applicable instrument. The platform is described as voluntary cooperation; that does not establish that every recipient faces no separate legal or contractual duty.\n\n## National procedures differ; the acronym is not an identity\n\nWIPO's contributor-supplied operating-procedures page (see source references) undated and observed9September2026, provides two useful contrasts. Brazil's table describes rightsholder evidence/notice with a five-day comment opportunity, CCP assessment, SFI approval and CNCP upload. An operator may seek review for an incorrect listing or changed conduct; the stated analysis period is60days. Removal depends on the specified authorities' review. The underlying executed cooperation agreement and proof of these safeguards in a case were not acquired. Its separate reference to domestic circulation to payment intermediaries must not be treated as WIPO advertising-user permission to freeze bank accounts.\n\nJapan's table identifies CODA, an association formed at the instance of Japanese ministries, using member-company/association data and updates approximately every two months. Its own list is also called the Infringing Website List (IWL). The table supplies criteria but no detailed operator-appeal mechanism. CODA's IWL is not PIPCU's IWL. The presence of this association also prevents simplification of every contributor into a government ministry. Neither table's dated/undated operating summary proves current execution of every step.\n\n## What the UK connection actually establishes\n\nThe2019 framework paragraph3 describes PIPCU's IWL as a national precedent: rightsholder evidence verified by police, then shared via a portal. The FAQ likewise cites a2017 OperationCreative effectiveness claim as rationale. Neither passage says PIPCU signed a contributor agreement, uploaded its list or supplied an ongoing WIPO feed. The currently posted procedures page has eight country headings and none for theUK, but it is not established as an exhaustive or current roster. Its omission does not prove non-participation.\n\nBefore acquisition, reused retained2019 IPO report scoped text (../pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09/referral-delivery2019.scoped-derived.txt, OperationCreative section) and the2022 strategy's OperationCreative paragraph in referral-strategy2022.html. They describe IWL distribution to advertisers/brands and industry-intelligence input. They do not identify WIPO as the recipient. This was a narrow reread, not a new audit of those reports or their cumulative outcomes. Root's separate recipient lane and Carver's police lane own named uses and PIPCU process details.\n\nThe defensible relation is PIPCU/IWL -> cited precedent for WIPO's coordination project. An operational IWL -> WIPO feed remains OPEN. A signed contributor LoU, official dated admission/upload account or a named recipient's explicit feed provenance would change that result. Co-appearance in a blocklist discussion, a shared acronym, or access to both systems does not.\n\n## Candidate relationships and unresolved records\n\nCandidate typed relations, not case additions: WIPO -> advertising users [access approval]; national contributors -> national lists [classification and maintenance]; contributor -> selected user [data-access permission/refusal]; user -> selected national lists [selection]; WIPO -> aggregated distribution service [resource provision]; user -> advertising-placement system [permitted purpose, implemented use requires separate evidence]; affected operator -> national contributor [review route]; national removal -> contributor WIPO update [dated prescribed process]; cross-list removal -> other contributors [published notification capability]. Keep notification, actual propagation and downstream restoration as distinct states.\n\nThe most consequential missing public instruments are a current versioned user agreement/LoU, a cross-border correction/removal propagation requirement, and an exercised correction showing what recipients did after an entry changed. No WIPO-wide challenge tribunal or compensation obligation was found in the finite inspected sources; national remedies remain source-specific. This does not claim that no additional contractual instruments exist.\n\n### Parked discovery only: WIPO ALERT Pay\n\nExact discovery URL: WIPO Webcast, Advisory Committee on Enforcement,4June2026 afternoon (see source references) Search result title was WIPO Webcast; the URL identifies the session/date. A displayed search extract attributes to a WIPO speaker an update describing WIPO ALERT Pay, a reported pilot with rightsholders/payment providers and movement into development. The full webcast/transcript and underlying report were NOT opened/read, the video was not watched, no original was captured, names/figures/stages were not verified, and no fact or case edge is promoted from it. It is a candidate for the next forest because payment distribution might differ materially from the ad-user agreement. It must not be folded into the present WIPO ALERT rules.\n\n## Original custody and actual read scope\n\nAllfivecapturedURLs returned200 on one ordinary publicGET each. Manifest wipo-captures.json records exactURLs, acquisitiontimes, bytecounts, hashes and derivative ancestry. No source-access failure needed recovery in this lane.\n\n**wipo-index.html** — SHA256 `39f87737f0633818b2d726aeb24d24081f3883e0d394afad88b37870f1b930dc`. Complete substantive public landing text from title through roles/warning/procedures link read via official reader; original DOM inspected for project source href. No database search/API/form/video used. Undated page observed9September2026; latest visible news dates are not publication dates for the page.\n\n**wipo-faq.html** — SHA256 `ba3e517615565ef9f865343b45c10698b00bbc17ae24c1481568392bf1bef5f9`. Complete substantive FAQ read, including eligibility, listselection/contributoraccess, useagreement/confidentiality/freeaccess, accuracydisclaimer and crosslistdeletionnotice. Undated public account; not an executed useragreement.\n\n**wipo-procedures.html** — SHA256 `ab8bb5196d50f0d5664438cd7059020565e056f77e16c383e8d831966f7b7e3f`. Country heading inventory inspected; complete Brazil and Japan tables read directly from original. Other country tables not systematically reviewed. These are contributor-supplied summaries hostedbyWIPO, not underlying executed agreements or complete currentnationallegalaudit. Undated; historical officeholder details not promoted ascurrent.\n\n**wipo-project-index.html** — SHA256 `a07fe913e2a571051127031b3a6e2b4ed17cbf5f9d56d8f5c7d27ac06ac13d6f`. Documentcode/title/publicationdate/preparedbySecretariat/Englishlink verified; navigation not substantive. Publication18June2019.\n\n**wipo-project2019.pdf** — SHA256 `103b26be0b382778579688a170db1078f24d462301e50dfef18b56168827f535`. Entire8-page substantive text read from officialreader and directoriginalPDF extraction, including background/PIPCUprecedent, paras6-27, LoUs/UserAgreements, sitesofconcern, appeals/updates, country/list controls and testdata/currentstatus. Embedded UI screenshots/figures not independently visually inspected. Source date18June2019; documented design/reportatthatdate, not evidenceofcurrentruntimeexecution.\n\nDiscovery was limited to two initial officialWIPOqueries for rules/agreements, followed by three targeted questions for UK/contributor/appeal joins. Their results led to the current pages and the projectdocument linked byWIPO itself. The 2025EUIPO discussionpaper, Ukraine legislative accounts, WIPO2026report/webcast, secondaryblog and academic results were discoveryonly and did not become findings. No wholesale globalIP survey or underlying national statute/appeal-case acquisition was attempted. Fulltext extraction is not proof of visual inspection or runtime execution. Acquisition closed pending combinedforest.\n",
        "file": "research/creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-wipo-distribution.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance",
        "title": "DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation",
        "description": "Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. Three directly linked DFF records establish a reported transfer of grant-selection decisions and subsequent board adoption. They do not supply the operative delegation, appointment decision or executed grant instrument. The previously accepted August 2026 announcement is reused context, not new independent confirmation",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. Three directly linked DFF records establish a reported transfer of grant-selection decisions and subsequent board adoption. They do not supply the operative delegation, appointment decision or executed grant instrument. The previously accepted August 2026 announcement is reused context, not new independent confirmation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-authority-changes-over-time\">The authority changes over time</h2>\n<p>The [8 October 2024 pilot announcement](http[local research file] by Thomas Vink, invited expressions of interest between 8 and 27 October. The initial process covered only pre-litigation grants; litigation-track funding was to continue under the existing process. The Peer Group would review applications and collectively decide which ones to recommend for support, replacing the prior expert-panel stage and reducing the grants team&#x27;s decision role. Expansion into strategy, criteria and future member selection was an intention, not an accomplished transfer. Read: official-reader lines 9–12, 36–44; full substantive article read. Original: <code>allocation-pilot2024.html</code>.</p>\n<p>The [25 March 2026 retrospective](http[local research file] reports that the first 2025 round involved ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects. The second involved 17 peers selecting 13 projects across both grant types. It states that <strong>DFF&#x27;s board formally adopted this decision-making process in March 2026</strong>, ending the pilot. Strategy, criteria and priority-setting remained subjects for further change. These are DFF&#x27;s published accounts, not inspected board minutes. Read: lines 9–19 and 65–68. Original: <code>allocation-retrospective2026.html</code>.</p>\n<p>The same retrospective describes staff facilitation and provision of previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Participants report weighing legal avenues, prospects, budget justification, impact and protection of affected people, with competing priorities discussed collectively. These are descriptions of practice, not a published binding scoring rubric. No source inspected here identifies who sets the available budget or gives the group power to expand it. Read: lines 24, 28–38 and 43–49; full substantive discussion read.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-actually-allocated-and-what-remains-unresolved\">What is actually allocated, and what remains unresolved</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Stage</th>\n<th>Evidence and boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Member recruitment and eligibility</td>\n<td>The 2024 call sought a mix including existing experts, grantees, applicants and the wider community; litigation expertise was not essential. Lived experience, intersecting issues and regional representation were sought. This describes desired composition, not exhaustive legal eligibility or a right to appointment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Appointment and renewal</td>\n<td>The current page says DFF ran an open call, received about 40 applications and began with ten members. It does not identify the appointing person/body, selection votes, term length, removal grounds or renewal rule.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Conflicts and confidentiality</td>\n<td>The current page says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality and conflict policies, and are compensated. The actual terms, conflict definitions, disclosure obligations, recusal procedure and compensation amounts were not acquired. Permitting grantee/applicant participation does not establish self-dealing or failure to recuse.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Grant selection</td>\n<td>Later records describe peers making grant decisions across both types. The earlier pilot called their output recommendations. Preserve these stages and dates; neither wording proves legal power to bind DFF to a contract.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Board and staff</td>\n<td>The board is reported to have adopted the model; staff facilitate reviews. These roles do not establish either a retained award-by-award veto or its complete absence.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Signature, payment and redress</td>\n<td>The three records do not disclose grant signatories, post-selection checks, payment authorisation, suspension/recovery rights or an applicant appeal procedure. Do not import Oak&#x27;s separate grant-letter workflow into DFF&#x27;s grants.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The [current Community Peer Group page](http[local research file] supports the recruitment, signed-terms and compensation descriptions above (reader lines 5–9). Its roster records affiliations, not corporate reserved seats, and is not treated as an appointment instrument. Its references to a pilot remain visible alongside the linked March 2026 account of adoption; use the dated retrospective for that transition. Original: <code>allocation-peer-group.html</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"consequence-for-the-existing-liberty-grant-finding\">Consequence for the existing Liberty grant finding</h2>\n<p>The evidence now supports a more precise division: DFF established a process, the board reportedly adopted it, and peers reportedly selected projects within an available funding budget. A claim that DFF staff alone chose the June 2026 Liberty grant would erase this stated process. Conversely, saying the peers control the whole institution or that Oak/DFF retained no contractual rights would exceed the records. Public accounts of selection and internal debate do not identify the people who voted on Liberty or reveal its agreement.</p>\n<p>The strongest alternative to a claim of complete authority transfer is that a genuine delegated selection process operates inside an institutional strategy, budget and legal framework whose reserved rights are not disclosed here. The exact discriminating records are the signed <strong>Peer Group Terms of Reference and incorporated conflict policy</strong>, the <strong>March 2026 board adoption/delegation resolution</strong>, and the applicable <strong>DFF grant agreement or execution policy</strong>. The first two would clarify appointment, recusal and the force of selections; the last would locate signature and payment authority. None was read in this bounded pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-closure\">Custody and closure</h2>\n<p>The starting page was an actual link in the accepted August 2026 announcement; the two additional records were actual links on that page. All three original HTMLs were retained by one successful ordinary GET each. Full extracted derivatives and exact hashes/read scopes are in <code>allocation-captures.json</code>. No applications, forms, roster biographies, governance repositories or further linked articles were pursued. There was no failed-route recovery, account activity, outreach, graph, forest, current-work, visual or package change. Acquisition is closed for root review.</p>",
        "path": "dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09/allocation-governance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-dffpeer",
          "w32-gdi-s-dffpilot",
          "w32-gdi-s-dffadoption"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. Three directly linked DFF records establish a reported transfer of grant-selection decisions and subsequent board adoption. They do not supply the operative delegation, appointment decision or executed grant instrument. The previously accepted August 2026 announcement is reused context, not new independent confirmation.\n\n## The authority changes over time\n\nThe 8 October 2024 pilot announcement (see source references) by Thomas Vink, invited expressions of interest between 8 and 27 October. The initial process covered only pre-litigation grants; litigation-track funding was to continue under the existing process. The Peer Group would review applications and collectively decide which ones to recommend for support, replacing the prior expert-panel stage and reducing the grants team's decision role. Expansion into strategy, criteria and future member selection was an intention, not an accomplished transfer. Read: official-reader lines 9–12, 36–44; full substantive article read. Original: `allocation-pilot2024.html`.\n\nThe 25 March 2026 retrospective (see source references) reports that the first 2025 round involved ten peers choosing three pre-litigation projects. The second involved 17 peers selecting 13 projects across both grant types. It states that **DFF's board formally adopted this decision-making process in March 2026**, ending the pilot. Strategy, criteria and priority-setting remained subjects for further change. These are DFF's published accounts, not inspected board minutes. Read: lines 9–19 and 65–68. Original: `allocation-retrospective2026.html`.\n\nThe same retrospective describes staff facilitation and provision of previous-grantee information, other assessments and budgets. Participants report weighing legal avenues, prospects, budget justification, impact and protection of affected people, with competing priorities discussed collectively. These are descriptions of practice, not a published binding scoring rubric. No source inspected here identifies who sets the available budget or gives the group power to expand it. Read: lines 24, 28–38 and 43–49; full substantive discussion read.\n\n## What is actually allocated, and what remains unresolved\n\n| Stage | Evidence and boundary |\n| --- | --- |\n| Member recruitment and eligibility | The 2024 call sought a mix including existing experts, grantees, applicants and the wider community; litigation expertise was not essential. Lived experience, intersecting issues and regional representation were sought. This describes desired composition, not exhaustive legal eligibility or a right to appointment. |\n| Appointment and renewal | The current page says DFF ran an open call, received about 40 applications and began with ten members. It does not identify the appointing person/body, selection votes, term length, removal grounds or renewal rule. |\n| Conflicts and confidentiality | The current page says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality and conflict policies, and are compensated. The actual terms, conflict definitions, disclosure obligations, recusal procedure and compensation amounts were not acquired. Permitting grantee/applicant participation does not establish self-dealing or failure to recuse. |\n| Grant selection | Later records describe peers making grant decisions across both types. The earlier pilot called their output recommendations. Preserve these stages and dates; neither wording proves legal power to bind DFF to a contract. |\n| Board and staff | The board is reported to have adopted the model; staff facilitate reviews. These roles do not establish either a retained award-by-award veto or its complete absence. |\n| Signature, payment and redress | The three records do not disclose grant signatories, post-selection checks, payment authorisation, suspension/recovery rights or an applicant appeal procedure. Do not import Oak's separate grant-letter workflow into DFF's grants. |\n\nThe current Community Peer Group page (see source references) supports the recruitment, signed-terms and compensation descriptions above (reader lines 5–9). Its roster records affiliations, not corporate reserved seats, and is not treated as an appointment instrument. Its references to a pilot remain visible alongside the linked March 2026 account of adoption; use the dated retrospective for that transition. Original: `allocation-peer-group.html`.\n\n## Consequence for the existing Liberty grant finding\n\nThe evidence now supports a more precise division: DFF established a process, the board reportedly adopted it, and peers reportedly selected projects within an available funding budget. A claim that DFF staff alone chose the June 2026 Liberty grant would erase this stated process. Conversely, saying the peers control the whole institution or that Oak/DFF retained no contractual rights would exceed the records. Public accounts of selection and internal debate do not identify the people who voted on Liberty or reveal its agreement.\n\nThe strongest alternative to a claim of complete authority transfer is that a genuine delegated selection process operates inside an institutional strategy, budget and legal framework whose reserved rights are not disclosed here. The exact discriminating records are the signed **Peer Group Terms of Reference and incorporated conflict policy**, the **March 2026 board adoption/delegation resolution**, and the applicable **DFF grant agreement or execution policy**. The first two would clarify appointment, recusal and the force of selections; the last would locate signature and payment authority. None was read in this bounded pass.\n\n## Custody and closure\n\nThe starting page was an actual link in the accepted August 2026 announcement; the two additional records were actual links on that page. All three original HTMLs were retained by one successful ordinary GET each. Full extracted derivatives and exact hashes/read scopes are in `allocation-captures.json`. No applications, forms, roster biographies, governance repositories or further linked articles were pursued. There was no failed-route recovery, account activity, outreach, graph, forest, current-work, visual or package change. Acquisition is closed for root review.\n",
        "file": "research/dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition",
        "title": "Australian duty-of-care policy disposition",
        "description": "Bounded acquisition, 9 September 2026. The 8 September 2026 exposure draft is a proposal, not an enacted or operating duty. This note follows the funding/governance forest assessment and reads the existing policy-lineage, operative-authority, Mannifera-selection and McKinnon-governance packets. It records transmission and decisions; it does not attribute leg",
        "html": "<p>Bounded acquisition, 9 September 2026. The 8 September 2026 exposure draft is a proposal, not an enacted or operating duty. This note follows the funding/governance forest assessment and reads the existing policy-lineage, operative-authority, Mannifera-selection and McKinnon-governance packets. It records transmission and decisions; it does not attribute legislative control to a funder.</p>\n<p>The supported structure has parallel paths: <strong>Reset model → HRLC express endorsement</strong>, and <strong>Reset submission70 → statutory-review reasoning → government commitment tied to that review</strong>. The record does not establish HRLC as the intermediary carrying Reset into the reviewer&#x27;s reasoning. The public decision record supports the overarching duty while modifying or leaving open important components. It does not establish government adoption of the full HRLC/Reset package, NGO authorship of the exposure draft, or funder approval of statutory wording.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-actually-travelled\">What actually travelled</h2>\n<p>HRLC&#x27;s submission dated 5 July 2024 recommends that government adopt Reset.Tech Australia&#x27;s approach. Its recommendation section says the “government adopts Reset.Tech Australia’s risk-based approach”; the ensuing five pillars cover duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability. Section 5 identifies Reset&#x27;s Five Pillars and cites the April 2024 Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper, footnote 23. The transparency request expressly includes vetted researchers <strong>and civil society organisations</strong>. This is an attributable endorsement and submission, not similarity between two reports. [HRLC submission 155, PDF/printed p5 §2; p10 §5 and fn23; p11 §5.1.4](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>HRLC also explicitly adopts the World Economic Forum&#x27;s 2023 Typology of Online Harms as its framework for understanding online harm. This identifies a separate taxonomy-to-submission transmission, not government adoption of that taxonomy. [Submission155, PDF/printed p9 §4.3, footnotes15–18](http[local research file] The external WEF original was not acquired in this run.</p>\n<p>The published updated review, internally dated October 2024 and published 4 February 2025, supplies the official reasoning bridge. Its available text is not assumed identical to the original October delivery; the version evidence does not establish that the Reset citation was newly inserted. In §5.5 the reviewer favours a singular overarching duty, identifies Woods/Perrin and Carnegie antecedents, and quotes Reset submission 70 p5 when explaining why content-specific duties can miss harmful service design. Footnotes 37–38 identify that submission. The same section names other supporters; attribution to Reset is evidence of use in the review&#x27;s reasoning, not exclusive authorship or but-for causation. [Statutory review, printed p53 §5.5](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Minister Rowland announced the government&#x27;s duty-of-care commitment in the Sydney Institute speech on <strong>13 November 2024</strong>. The speech explicitly grounds the direction in the recently received Rickard review and international alignment. The associated release is dated <strong>14 November 2024</strong>. Neither relevant announcement passage attributes the decision to HRLC, Reset or their funders. These are separate announcement/publication dates, not competing dates for a single document. [Speech, A Digital Duty of Care section](http[local research file] [release](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A newly inspected departmental release establishes official awareness more concretely than an NGO&#x27;s access claim. FOI 25-247 Document 2, briefing QB24-000162, is marked last edited and SES-cleared <strong>26 November 2024</strong>. Its media table summarises HRLC&#x27;s DSA-style proposal and an October article featuring HRLC and Reset endorsing duty of care. The clearance is after the announcement: it establishes inclusion in an official briefing, not that the minister read these articles before deciding. A separate released presentation dated 26 February 2025 describes review recommendations and implementation risks; it is a discussion document, not a decision minute. [FOI bundle, Document 2 PDF pp10–15, especially pp14–15; Document 5 PDF pp32–35](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"decisions-and-differences\">Decisions and differences</h2>\n<p>The <strong>14 April 2026</strong> response is a government decision record, distinct from recommendations or consultation summaries. Its labels preserve a material distinction: support in principle can leave implementation open; note requires further consideration. The following are dispositions of <strong>review recommendations</strong>, not individually addressed replies to HRLC. [Government response, PDF/printed pp3–9](http[local research file]</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Review proposal</th>\n<th>Government disposition</th>\n<th>Exact locator and consequence</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Rec4, singular overarching duty</td>\n<td>Support</td>\n<td>p4: accepted policy architecture.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rec7, automatic highest tier above 10% population</td>\n<td>Not supported</td>\n<td>p5; p4 explanation favours proportionate application wherever risk exists.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rec9, eSafety mandatory codes</td>\n<td>Support in principle</td>\n<td>p5; p4 explanation instead describes government-made rules with parliamentary scrutiny.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rec13, safeguarded authorised-researcher access</td>\n<td>Support in principle</td>\n<td>p6: implementation remained open.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rec25, accessible internal complaints</td>\n<td>Support</td>\n<td>p8.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rec26, digital Ombuds scheme</td>\n<td>Note</td>\n<td>p9; p7 prioritises internal dispute mechanisms initially.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The September draft adds a consequential boundary to the research request: proposed <strong>205B(1)</strong> requires employment by an Australian university and approval under prospective legislative rules. Research additionally requires ethics approval and a prescribed public-interest category. Section <strong>205C</strong> delegates scheme design, including privacy, security, confidentiality, conflicts, fees and review. This narrows direct eligibility compared with the NGOs&#x27; request; it neither awards an NGO a data-access entitlement nor excludes all university collaboration. The reason for choosing this boundary is not established here. <a>Exposure draft, PDF pp63–65 / printed pp59–61</a>]</p>\n<p>HRLC&#x27;s October Rights-First report also sought clear reasons for content/account restrictions, accessible remedies, and review of significant regulatory decisions. Those safeguards belong in the comparison alongside its coercive powers proposal. <a>Rights-First, PDF p12 / printed pp22–23, and PDF p15 / printed pp28–29</a>]</p>\n<p>The official May–June 2026 consultation summary reports more than forty meetings and support across several stakeholder categories, including industry, alongside competing priorities. It groups participants instead of assigning the relevant demands to HRLC or Reset. It cannot close the attribution gap or prove that a recorded suggestion was accepted. [Summary, PDF pp1–2](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-directional-edges-and-limits\">Candidate directional edges and limits</h2>\n<p>These are candidate relations for reconciliation with existing entities and source IDs, not canonical edits.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate</th>\n<th>Direction / typed relation</th>\n<th>Stage and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-hrlc-reset</td>\n<td>HRLC → Reset five-pillar model: expressly recommends adoption</td>\n<td>Submitted advocacy; document dated 5 July 2024, submission155 p5. Exact receipt date not established.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-hrlc-wef-taxonomy</td>\n<td>HRLC submission155 → WEF2023 harm taxonomy: expressly adopts framework</td>\n<td>Proposal framing, §4.3 p9. No government-adoption edge.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-review-reset</td>\n<td>Statutory review → Reset submission70: cites reasoning for overarching duty</td>\n<td>Published updated reviewer recommendation, internally dated October2024/published4February2025; available text not assumed identical to initial delivery; §5.5 p53. Reuse existing lineage edge if equivalent.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-brief-awareness</td>\n<td>Departmental briefing → HRLC/Reset public advocacy: records media coverage</td>\n<td>Official awareness by 26 November 2024; FOI Document2 pp14–15. No predecision receipt inference.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-government-rec4</td>\n<td>Government → reviewrec4: supports</td>\n<td>Published response, 14 April 2026; p4. Policy acceptance, not enactment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-government-rec7</td>\n<td>Government → reviewrec7: does not support</td>\n<td>Same response p5. Do not relabel as an HRLC-specific rejection.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-government-rec13</td>\n<td>Government → reviewrec13: supports in principle</td>\n<td>Same response p6. No award, provider selection or payment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-e-research-scope</td>\n<td>Exposure draft → researcher eligibility: requires university employment</td>\n<td>Proposed 205B. Comparative narrowing, with motive and drafting author unresolved.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The strongest rival explanation is a government selecting from convergent international models and many contributors through its independent review, rather than executing a single privately directed package. The records sustain a real, attributed NGO-to-review path while also sustaining government choice and narrowing. Funding and commissioned research increase advocacy capacity; the records read here do not turn that capacity into a statutory approval right.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records would be the department&#x27;s recommendation-to-clause drafting instructions, an attributed consultation response matrix, or the decision/reasons for university-only researcher eligibility and delegated complaint safeguards. Likely holders are the department&#x27;s online-safety policy area and ministerial office; future explanatory materials or data-access rules could also resolve the scope. No outreach is authorised. Stop here for the whole-case forest assessment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-and-custody-ledger\">Reading and custody ledger</h2>\n<p>All access observations are from 9 September 2026. <code>read</code> below refers to the stated scope, never an entire report by implication. Page numbers in this note are one-based; PDF and printed numbers are distinguished where different.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Local alias</th>\n<th>Primary record and read scope</th>\n<th>Access / custody</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-s-hrlc155</td>\n<td>Linked original above; cover, recommendations p5, §4.3 p9, §§5–5.1.4 pp10–11 and accountability p17</td>\n<td>Read through PDF reader (18 pages; reader refs turn886view1, turn912view0/1). One ordinary GET timed out at 30s; no original retained or hash.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-s-government-response</td>\n<td>Linked original above, cover and response definitions, duty pp3–6, complaints pp7–9, enforcement p11</td>\n<td>Read through PDF reader (16 pages; turn882view1, turn907view1/2, turn912view2). Publication date independently read on the department&#x27;s response landing page. One GET timed out at 30s; no original or hash.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-s-foi25247</td>\n<td>Linked original above, Document2 pp10–15, Document5 pp32–39</td>\n<td>Read through PDF reader (41 pages; turn903view1/2, turn907view3). Specific release date not established. One GET timed out at 30s; no original or hash. Redacted portions were not reconstructed.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Existing statutory-review source</td>\n<td>Official indexed original §5.5 printed53, including footnotes34–38; official landing page publication 4 February 2025</td>\n<td>Scoped primary text read; not a new full-PDF inspection. Existing ordinary PDF timeout route remained closed. Actual linked DOCX click returned Internal Error; no retry.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Existing exposure-draft source</td>\n<td>Reused available reader; current-lane spot checks 25H, 26F–G, 205B–C</td>\n<td>Read, not newly acquired. Existing ordinary PDF timeout route remained closed; no original-byte hash.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-s-announcement</td>\n<td>Linked ministerial speech13Nov2024 and release14Nov2024, relevant duty passages</td>\n<td>HTML reader inspected; no local original.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Existing Rights-First source</td>\n<td>Linked original above, principles3 and5 at PDF12 and15</td>\n<td>Scoped PDF reader read; no local original acquired in this lane.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>disp-au-s-consult-summary</td>\n<td>Linked original above, PDF1–2 of3</td>\n<td>Scoped PDF reader read; not an attributed participant transcript. No original acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>No ACNC, OPD403 or closed normal-GET exposure/review routes were retried. No canonical case, forest file, account, submission or public surface was changed. The only lane output is this note; the three fresh capture attempts yielded no retained originals.</p>",
        "path": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09/australia-disposition.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-hrlc155",
          "w13-disp-s-au-response",
          "w13-disp-s-rowland-speech",
          "w13-disp-s-rowland-release",
          "w13-disp-s-foi25247"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded acquisition, 9 September 2026. The 8 September 2026 exposure draft is a proposal, not an enacted or operating duty. This note follows the funding/governance forest assessment and reads the existing policy-lineage, operative-authority, Mannifera-selection and McKinnon-governance packets. It records transmission and decisions; it does not attribute legislative control to a funder.\n\nThe supported structure has parallel paths: **Reset model → HRLC express endorsement**, and **Reset submission70 → statutory-review reasoning → government commitment tied to that review**. The record does not establish HRLC as the intermediary carrying Reset into the reviewer's reasoning. The public decision record supports the overarching duty while modifying or leaving open important components. It does not establish government adoption of the full HRLC/Reset package, NGO authorship of the exposure draft, or funder approval of statutory wording.\n\n## What actually travelled\n\nHRLC's submission dated 5 July 2024 recommends that government adopt Reset.Tech Australia's approach. Its recommendation section says the “government adopts Reset.Tech Australia’s risk-based approach”; the ensuing five pillars cover duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability. Section 5 identifies Reset's Five Pillars and cites the April 2024 Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper, footnote 23. The transparency request expressly includes vetted researchers **and civil society organisations**. This is an attributable endorsement and submission, not similarity between two reports. HRLC submission 155, PDF/printed p5 §2; p10 §5 and fn23; p11 §5.1.4 (see source references)\n\nHRLC also explicitly adopts the World Economic Forum's 2023 Typology of Online Harms as its framework for understanding online harm. This identifies a separate taxonomy-to-submission transmission, not government adoption of that taxonomy. Submission155, PDF/printed p9 §4.3, footnotes15–18 (see source references) The external WEF original was not acquired in this run.\n\nThe published updated review, internally dated October 2024 and published 4 February 2025, supplies the official reasoning bridge. Its available text is not assumed identical to the original October delivery; the version evidence does not establish that the Reset citation was newly inserted. In §5.5 the reviewer favours a singular overarching duty, identifies Woods/Perrin and Carnegie antecedents, and quotes Reset submission 70 p5 when explaining why content-specific duties can miss harmful service design. Footnotes 37–38 identify that submission. The same section names other supporters; attribution to Reset is evidence of use in the review's reasoning, not exclusive authorship or but-for causation. Statutory review, printed p53 §5.5 (see source references)\n\nMinister Rowland announced the government's duty-of-care commitment in the Sydney Institute speech on **13 November 2024**. The speech explicitly grounds the direction in the recently received Rickard review and international alignment. The associated release is dated **14 November 2024**. Neither relevant announcement passage attributes the decision to HRLC, Reset or their funders. These are separate announcement/publication dates, not competing dates for a single document. Speech, A Digital Duty of Care section (see source references) release (see source references)\n\nA newly inspected departmental release establishes official awareness more concretely than an NGO's access claim. FOI 25-247 Document 2, briefing QB24-000162, is marked last edited and SES-cleared **26 November 2024**. Its media table summarises HRLC's DSA-style proposal and an October article featuring HRLC and Reset endorsing duty of care. The clearance is after the announcement: it establishes inclusion in an official briefing, not that the minister read these articles before deciding. A separate released presentation dated 26 February 2025 describes review recommendations and implementation risks; it is a discussion document, not a decision minute. FOI bundle, Document 2 PDF pp10–15, especially pp14–15; Document 5 PDF pp32–35 (see source references)\n\n## Decisions and differences\n\nThe **14 April 2026** response is a government decision record, distinct from recommendations or consultation summaries. Its labels preserve a material distinction: support in principle can leave implementation open; note requires further consideration. The following are dispositions of **review recommendations**, not individually addressed replies to HRLC. Government response, PDF/printed pp3–9 (see source references)\n\n| Review proposal | Government disposition | Exact locator and consequence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Rec4, singular overarching duty | Support | p4: accepted policy architecture. |\n| Rec7, automatic highest tier above 10% population | Not supported | p5; p4 explanation favours proportionate application wherever risk exists. |\n| Rec9, eSafety mandatory codes | Support in principle | p5; p4 explanation instead describes government-made rules with parliamentary scrutiny. |\n| Rec13, safeguarded authorised-researcher access | Support in principle | p6: implementation remained open. |\n| Rec25, accessible internal complaints | Support | p8. |\n| Rec26, digital Ombuds scheme | Note | p9; p7 prioritises internal dispute mechanisms initially. |\n\nThe September draft adds a consequential boundary to the research request: proposed **205B(1)** requires employment by an Australian university and approval under prospective legislative rules. Research additionally requires ethics approval and a prescribed public-interest category. Section **205C** delegates scheme design, including privacy, security, confidentiality, conflicts, fees and review. This narrows direct eligibility compared with the NGOs' request; it neither awards an NGO a data-access entitlement nor excludes all university collaboration. The reason for choosing this boundary is not established here. Exposure draft, PDF pp63–65 / printed pp59–61]\n\nHRLC's October Rights-First report also sought clear reasons for content/account restrictions, accessible remedies, and review of significant regulatory decisions. Those safeguards belong in the comparison alongside its coercive powers proposal. Rights-First, PDF p12 / printed pp22–23, and PDF p15 / printed pp28–29]\n\nThe official May–June 2026 consultation summary reports more than forty meetings and support across several stakeholder categories, including industry, alongside competing priorities. It groups participants instead of assigning the relevant demands to HRLC or Reset. It cannot close the attribution gap or prove that a recorded suggestion was accepted. Summary, PDF pp1–2 (see source references)\n\n## Candidate directional edges and limits\n\nThese are candidate relations for reconciliation with existing entities and source IDs, not canonical edits.\n\n| Candidate | Direction / typed relation | Stage and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| disp-au-e-hrlc-reset | HRLC → Reset five-pillar model: expressly recommends adoption | Submitted advocacy; document dated 5 July 2024, submission155 p5. Exact receipt date not established. |\n| disp-au-e-hrlc-wef-taxonomy | HRLC submission155 → WEF2023 harm taxonomy: expressly adopts framework | Proposal framing, §4.3 p9. No government-adoption edge. |\n| disp-au-e-review-reset | Statutory review → Reset submission70: cites reasoning for overarching duty | Published updated reviewer recommendation, internally dated October2024/published4February2025; available text not assumed identical to initial delivery; §5.5 p53. Reuse existing lineage edge if equivalent. |\n| disp-au-e-brief-awareness | Departmental briefing → HRLC/Reset public advocacy: records media coverage | Official awareness by 26 November 2024; FOI Document2 pp14–15. No predecision receipt inference. |\n| disp-au-e-government-rec4 | Government → reviewrec4: supports | Published response, 14 April 2026; p4. Policy acceptance, not enactment. |\n| disp-au-e-government-rec7 | Government → reviewrec7: does not support | Same response p5. Do not relabel as an HRLC-specific rejection. |\n| disp-au-e-government-rec13 | Government → reviewrec13: supports in principle | Same response p6. No award, provider selection or payment. |\n| disp-au-e-research-scope | Exposure draft → researcher eligibility: requires university employment | Proposed 205B. Comparative narrowing, with motive and drafting author unresolved. |\n\nThe strongest rival explanation is a government selecting from convergent international models and many contributors through its independent review, rather than executing a single privately directed package. The records sustain a real, attributed NGO-to-review path while also sustaining government choice and narrowing. Funding and commissioned research increase advocacy capacity; the records read here do not turn that capacity into a statutory approval right.\n\nThe next discriminating records would be the department's recommendation-to-clause drafting instructions, an attributed consultation response matrix, or the decision/reasons for university-only researcher eligibility and delegated complaint safeguards. Likely holders are the department's online-safety policy area and ministerial office; future explanatory materials or data-access rules could also resolve the scope. No outreach is authorised. Stop here for the whole-case forest assessment.\n\n## Reading and custody ledger\n\nAll access observations are from 9 September 2026. `read` below refers to the stated scope, never an entire report by implication. Page numbers in this note are one-based; PDF and printed numbers are distinguished where different.\n\n| Local alias | Primary record and read scope | Access / custody |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| disp-au-s-hrlc155 | Linked original above; cover, recommendations p5, §4.3 p9, §§5–5.1.4 pp10–11 and accountability p17 | Read through PDF reader (18 pages; reader refs turn886view1, turn912view0/1). One ordinary GET timed out at 30s; no original retained or hash. |\n| disp-au-s-government-response | Linked original above, cover and response definitions, duty pp3–6, complaints pp7–9, enforcement p11 | Read through PDF reader (16 pages; turn882view1, turn907view1/2, turn912view2). Publication date independently read on the department's response landing page. One GET timed out at 30s; no original or hash. |\n| disp-au-s-foi25247 | Linked original above, Document2 pp10–15, Document5 pp32–39 | Read through PDF reader (41 pages; turn903view1/2, turn907view3). Specific release date not established. One GET timed out at 30s; no original or hash. Redacted portions were not reconstructed. |\n| Existing statutory-review source | Official indexed original §5.5 printed53, including footnotes34–38; official landing page publication 4 February 2025 | Scoped primary text read; not a new full-PDF inspection. Existing ordinary PDF timeout route remained closed. Actual linked DOCX click returned Internal Error; no retry. |\n| Existing exposure-draft source | Reused available reader; current-lane spot checks 25H, 26F–G, 205B–C | Read, not newly acquired. Existing ordinary PDF timeout route remained closed; no original-byte hash. |\n| disp-au-s-announcement | Linked ministerial speech13Nov2024 and release14Nov2024, relevant duty passages | HTML reader inspected; no local original. |\n| Existing Rights-First source | Linked original above, principles3 and5 at PDF12 and15 | Scoped PDF reader read; no local original acquired in this lane. |\n| disp-au-s-consult-summary | Linked original above, PDF1–2 of3 | Scoped PDF reader read; not an attributed participant transcript. No original acquired. |\n\nNo ACNC, OPD403 or closed normal-GET exposure/review routes were retried. No canonical case, forest file, account, submission or public surface was changed. The only lane output is this note; the three fresh capture attempts yielded no retained originals.\n",
        "file": "research/disposition-wave-2026-09-09-australia-disposition.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition",
        "title": "UK network submissions: three published dispositions",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition following the latest forest assessment; no canonical case edits. This packet follows the Online Safety Act Network (OSAN, predecessor name of the current Online Safety Network) from submissions into regulator responses. It does not reassess the whole current Online Safety Act regime.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition following the latest forest assessment; no canonical case edits. This packet follows the Online Safety Act Network (OSAN, predecessor name of the current Online Safety Network) from submissions into regulator responses. It does not reassess the whole current Online Safety Act regime.</p>\n<p>The strongest new pattern is <strong>selective, attributable uptake with explicit resistance</strong>. These records establish that the network&#x27;s arguments entered the decision process and received substantive answers. They do not establish control of Ofcom, preferential treatment of the network, or a donor-to-regulatory-decision instruction chain. The prior UK operator and articles packets supply organizational context only.</p>\n<h2 id=\"1-illegal-content-inference-proposed-interpretation-not-accepted\">1. Illegal-content inference: proposed interpretation not accepted</h2>\n<p><strong>Submission.</strong> OSAN&#x27;s <em>Full response to Ofcom&#x27;s consultation on protecting people from illegal harms online</em> is internally dated <strong>February 2024</strong>, with Maeve Walsh as contact (PDF/printed p2). Its pp25–26 argue that the regulatory threshold should be understood against a civil balance of probabilities, allowing consideration of wider contextual evidence. The cyberflashing example refers to widespread harm and limited countervailing interests, expressly contrasting difficulties around suicide offences. It is therefore inaccurate to recast the original as a universal test that any speech without apparent benefit should be illegal. [Ofcom-hosted original response, pp25–26](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>Disposition, 16 December 2024.</strong> Ofcom identifies OSAN and cites those pages in <em>Volume 3: Transparency, trust and other guidance</em>, <strong>2.19 and footnote11, PDF/printed p10</strong>. At <strong>2.20–2.21, pp10–11</strong>, it declines the proposed departure: the Act requires reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements; the appropriate inference depends on the offence and context. Ofcom also invokes the expression costs of erroneously treating large quantities of lawful activity as illegal. It agrees that this is not the criminal beyond-reasonable-doubt threshold, while denying that its consultation applied that threshold. This is an explicit adverse disposition of the proposed interpretation, not a court determination that OSAN&#x27;s legal argument was invalid. [Ofcom decision, 2.18–2.21](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>Personal contribution boundary.</strong> A separate network article by <strong>Lorna Woods</strong>, dated <strong>15 February 2024</strong>, makes this contextual civil-threshold argument under “Burden of Proof in a Civil Regime.” It supports a named public intellectual contribution. The full February response&#x27;s contact field alone does not prove Walsh wrote every passage. [Woods article](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"2-search-results-accepted-register-clarification-without-expanding-statutory-scope\">2. Search results: accepted register clarification, without expanding statutory scope</h2>\n<p><strong>Submission.</strong> The February response&#x27;s <strong>PDF/printed p97</strong> identifies a mismatch between the risk discussion, thumbnails/click-through pathways and the presentation of search obligations, including direct and indirect routes to harmful material. It provides a concrete concern about how the risk assessment and proposed measures fit together. [OSAN response, p97](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>Disposition, 16 December 2024.</strong> <em>Annex 1: Further stakeholder responses</em>, <strong>A1.9.9–A1.9.10, PDF/printed p94</strong>, attributes the concern to OSAN (footnote486, p97). Ofcom says it amended <strong>Register of Risks paragraph24.13</strong>, agreed with the wider risks highlighted and reiterated them in <strong>24.10–24.14</strong>. It simultaneously confines “search content” to the Act&#x27;s definition: content in results or reached through interaction with them, excluding subsequent interactions; footnote487 cites <strong>s57(2) and (5)</strong>. This supports an <strong>OSAN concern → acknowledged amendment of the risk register</strong> edge. It does not establish expansion of statutory liability, a new content-removal mandate or adoption of an unrestricted downstream-link duty. The final register was not independently acquired and compared in this pass; the amendment is expressly reported by its issuing regulator. [Ofcom Annex1, A1.9.9–10](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"3-childrens-minimum-ages-regulator-credits-feedback-including-osan-exact-clause-authorship-remains-open\">3. Children&#x27;s minimum ages: regulator credits feedback including OSAN; exact clause authorship remains open</h2>\n<p><strong>Dated network contribution.</strong> The full <em>Protection of Children Consultation: Response from Online Safety Act Network</em> names <strong>Professor Lorna Woods and Maeve Walsh</strong> on PDF p1 and is dated <strong>July 2024</strong> on p2. Its <strong>Issue8, pp66–69</strong>, criticises reliance on age gates without changing underlying service design, discusses under-13 detection and different-age experiences, and seeks clearer effectiveness metrics plus use of information-gathering powers to establish companies&#x27; capabilities. It also supports Ofcom not selecting a particular tool. These are differentiated proposals, not an uncomplicated demand for universal identification. [OSAN response2, pp1–2 and66–69](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>Actual decision, 24 April 2025.</strong> Ofcom&#x27;s children&#x27;s statement <em>Volume3: Assessing the risks of harms to children online</em>, <strong>8.170–8.171, PDF/printed pp36–37</strong>, clarifies that declared minimum ages in terms of service and self-declared ages are insufficient evidence for risk assessment. Without highly effective age assurance enforcing a minimum age, providers should conservatively assess the likely presence and ages of younger children. Ofcom calls these minor drafting changes in this statement. This particular decision is guidance on evidential assumptions for risk assessments: it does not, by itself, require every service to set a minimum age or every user to present identity documents. [Ofcom April decision, 8.169–8.171](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>Explicit attribution, published 15 May 2025.</strong> In the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee&#x27;s <strong>25th Report, paragraph23</strong>, Ofcom&#x27;s answer credits changes reflecting civil-society feedback <strong>including OSAN</strong>, giving the minimum-age clarification as its example. It also denies assigning greater weight to any stakeholder group. The Committee describes OSAN&#x27;s formal submission and publishes Ofcom/DSIT responses; it records OSAN&#x27;s continuing dissatisfaction at <strong>24</strong> and says at <strong>26</strong> it does not adjudicate the competing arguments. This is stronger evidence of recognized contribution than similar wording or a meeting. It is weaker than an exact accepted-edit record or proof OSAN originated the measure. [SLSC report, paragraphs11,23–26](http[local research file] [Report publication date](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The July response&#x27;s inspected age-assurance section does not contain the exact minimum-age formulation; text searches of both published OSAN response files also returned no exact “minimum age” match. That negative is limited by PDF extraction and terminology. The April statement&#x27;s nearby stakeholder footnotes do not uniquely identify an OSAN sentence behind this edit. Consequently, retain the edge as <strong>Ofcom publicly credited OSAN among contributing civil-society respondents</strong>, not <strong>Ofcom adopted Woods/Walsh&#x27;s specified minimum-age clause</strong>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"authority-and-chronology-boundaries-for-integration\">Authority and chronology boundaries for integration</h2>\n<p>The network is a submitter and advocate in these records. Woods and Walsh are named authors of the July response, not thereby statutory committee members or holders of regulatory approval rights. Targeted Ofcom searches did not establish a formal appointment for either; an unrelated result names <strong>Siobhan Walsh</strong>, not Maeve Walsh. This pass makes no claim that no formal role exists anywhere.</p>\n<p>The November2023 consultation title describes the consultation&#x27;s opening period, not the response date. The illegal-harms response itself says February2024. Ofcom&#x27;s current consultation page displays <strong>20 November 2024</strong> alongside the main response download; that is not treated as its submission date. [Ofcom consultation chronology and response listing](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The reported decisions are historical <strong>December2024 / April–May2025</strong> decisions. They are not presented as a complete current-law statement on 9 September2026. A later review must distinguish a subsequent change from reversal of these attributed decisions.</p>\n<p>Suggested precise relations for root, without creating canonical entries here:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Relation</th>\n<th>Record-supported verb and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>OSAN → February2024 illegal-harms response</td>\n<td>Submitted an identified consultation response; exact day not established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ofcom → OSAN inference proposal</td>\n<td>Declined proposed interpretation in published December2024 response</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ofcom → OSAN search-scope concern</td>\n<td>Acknowledged and reported amending risk-register wording; statutory scope retained</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Woods + Walsh → July2024 response</td>\n<td>Named co-authors</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ofcom → OSAN / minimum-age clarification</td>\n<td>Publicly credited OSAN among contributors in May2025; no exclusive or verbatim authorship proof</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OSAN → SLSC</td>\n<td>Formal submission considered during scrutiny; this confers no committee membership or adjudicatory power</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-actual-reading-scope\">Source custody and actual reading scope</h2>\n<p><strong>Retained reader capture:</strong> <code>uk-disposition-reader-extracts.json</code>, SHA256 <strong>c15aa176a8a012bfe25cb819787c8c6661d30a1e10ce697234cd06d35d1c22cc</strong>. It contains the three scoped public web-reader result groups. It is a derivative text capture, <strong>not the original PDFs and not their hashes</strong>. Context returned by the reader extends beyond the selected paragraphs; no complete-volume audit is claimed. The operative passages inspected are listed above.</p>\n<p><strong>Retained original:</strong> <code>uk-disposition-woods-icjg-2024.pdf</code>, ordinary public GET200, <strong>2,062,645 bytes</strong>, SHA256 <strong>4097e729563bd10b42046cc8d5392c2d5a688aef8a11d5ea219a7df18bec530f</strong>, nine pages. Source: [network-hosted article PDF](http[local research file] Text extraction did not expose the relevant heading; this PDF has not been visually audited and is not the evidential basis of the article summary. The corresponding public HTML was successfully read through ordinary GET, including the named author/date and civil-threshold section.</p>\n<p>Ofcom&#x27;s full February response was read through the public PDF reader at pp1–2,25–27 and97 plus date searches. July response2 was read at pp1–6 and66–69, with surrounding reader context; response1&#x27;s cover/initial sections were read and an exact-term search performed. Ofcom&#x27;s December Volume3 was read at cover and2.18–2.21; Annex1 at cover andA1.9.9–10 with surrounding search-moderation context. April Volume3 was read at cover and8.169–8.179. SLSC report was read at paragraphs11 and17–26 plus publication metadata.</p>\n<p><strong>Access gaps:</strong> the separate Ofcom “Our approach to developing Codes measures” PDF gave a reader error and ordinary GET403; that acquisition branch is closed and no unseen safe-harbour disposition from it is claimed. Network HTML initially failed through the web reader but ordinary GET succeeded. A direct Parliament HTML capture returned403; its public reader text was accessible and retained. No access controls were bypassed. No original Ofcom PDF hash is supplied. No visual proof of fine layout, handwritten annotation or hidden/redacted text is asserted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"coherent-stopping-point-and-next-separating-record\">Coherent stopping point and next separating record</h2>\n<p>The three decisions satisfy this run&#x27;s contribution-to-disposition test: an adverse interpretation decision, an expressly reported amendment, and regulator-attributed contribution to a concrete guidance clarification. No further acquisition is needed before the parent&#x27;s whole-case reassessment.</p>\n<p>The most useful next record is <strong>Ofcom&#x27;s consultation-response coding/decision log or drafting version comparison for April2025 paragraph8.171</strong>, with the cited OSAN input and approval trail. Custodian: Ofcom&#x27;s online-safety policy team / consultation records function. It would separate collective feedback attribution from the exact authorship and decisive influence of a particular proposal. For the search issue, the already published final Register24.10–24.14 and its consultation predecessor would resolve the small remaining text-diff question. Neither missing record warrants claiming that influence was absent; neither is needed to invent donor instruction or a veto. No request or outreach was made.</p>",
        "path": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09/uk-disposition.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w13-disp-s-osan-feb",
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-inference",
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-search",
          "w13-disp-s-woods-civil",
          "w13-disp-s-osan-july",
          "w13-disp-s-ofcom-child-risk",
          "w13-disp-s-slsc-report",
          "w13-disp-s-slsc-date"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition following the latest forest assessment; no canonical case edits. This packet follows the Online Safety Act Network (OSAN, predecessor name of the current Online Safety Network) from submissions into regulator responses. It does not reassess the whole current Online Safety Act regime.\n\nThe strongest new pattern is **selective, attributable uptake with explicit resistance**. These records establish that the network's arguments entered the decision process and received substantive answers. They do not establish control of Ofcom, preferential treatment of the network, or a donor-to-regulatory-decision instruction chain. The prior UK operator and articles packets supply organizational context only.\n\n## 1. Illegal-content inference: proposed interpretation not accepted\n\n**Submission.** OSAN's *Full response to Ofcom's consultation on protecting people from illegal harms online* is internally dated **February 2024**, with Maeve Walsh as contact (PDF/printed p2). Its pp25–26 argue that the regulatory threshold should be understood against a civil balance of probabilities, allowing consideration of wider contextual evidence. The cyberflashing example refers to widespread harm and limited countervailing interests, expressly contrasting difficulties around suicide offences. It is therefore inaccurate to recast the original as a universal test that any speech without apparent benefit should be illegal. Ofcom-hosted original response, pp25–26 (see source references)\n\n**Disposition, 16 December 2024.** Ofcom identifies OSAN and cites those pages in *Volume 3: Transparency, trust and other guidance*, **2.19 and footnote11, PDF/printed p10**. At **2.20–2.21, pp10–11**, it declines the proposed departure: the Act requires reasonable grounds to infer all necessary offence elements; the appropriate inference depends on the offence and context. Ofcom also invokes the expression costs of erroneously treating large quantities of lawful activity as illegal. It agrees that this is not the criminal beyond-reasonable-doubt threshold, while denying that its consultation applied that threshold. This is an explicit adverse disposition of the proposed interpretation, not a court determination that OSAN's legal argument was invalid. Ofcom decision, 2.18–2.21 (see source references)\n\n**Personal contribution boundary.** A separate network article by **Lorna Woods**, dated **15 February 2024**, makes this contextual civil-threshold argument under “Burden of Proof in a Civil Regime.” It supports a named public intellectual contribution. The full February response's contact field alone does not prove Walsh wrote every passage. Woods article (see source references)\n\n## 2. Search results: accepted register clarification, without expanding statutory scope\n\n**Submission.** The February response's **PDF/printed p97** identifies a mismatch between the risk discussion, thumbnails/click-through pathways and the presentation of search obligations, including direct and indirect routes to harmful material. It provides a concrete concern about how the risk assessment and proposed measures fit together. OSAN response, p97 (see source references)\n\n**Disposition, 16 December 2024.** *Annex 1: Further stakeholder responses*, **A1.9.9–A1.9.10, PDF/printed p94**, attributes the concern to OSAN (footnote486, p97). Ofcom says it amended **Register of Risks paragraph24.13**, agreed with the wider risks highlighted and reiterated them in **24.10–24.14**. It simultaneously confines “search content” to the Act's definition: content in results or reached through interaction with them, excluding subsequent interactions; footnote487 cites **s57(2) and (5)**. This supports an **OSAN concern → acknowledged amendment of the risk register** edge. It does not establish expansion of statutory liability, a new content-removal mandate or adoption of an unrestricted downstream-link duty. The final register was not independently acquired and compared in this pass; the amendment is expressly reported by its issuing regulator. Ofcom Annex1, A1.9.9–10 (see source references)\n\n## 3. Children's minimum ages: regulator credits feedback including OSAN; exact clause authorship remains open\n\n**Dated network contribution.** The full *Protection of Children Consultation: Response from Online Safety Act Network* names **Professor Lorna Woods and Maeve Walsh** on PDF p1 and is dated **July 2024** on p2. Its **Issue8, pp66–69**, criticises reliance on age gates without changing underlying service design, discusses under-13 detection and different-age experiences, and seeks clearer effectiveness metrics plus use of information-gathering powers to establish companies' capabilities. It also supports Ofcom not selecting a particular tool. These are differentiated proposals, not an uncomplicated demand for universal identification. OSAN response2, pp1–2 and66–69 (see source references)\n\n**Actual decision, 24 April 2025.** Ofcom's children's statement *Volume3: Assessing the risks of harms to children online*, **8.170–8.171, PDF/printed pp36–37**, clarifies that declared minimum ages in terms of service and self-declared ages are insufficient evidence for risk assessment. Without highly effective age assurance enforcing a minimum age, providers should conservatively assess the likely presence and ages of younger children. Ofcom calls these minor drafting changes in this statement. This particular decision is guidance on evidential assumptions for risk assessments: it does not, by itself, require every service to set a minimum age or every user to present identity documents. Ofcom April decision, 8.169–8.171 (see source references)\n\n**Explicit attribution, published 15 May 2025.** In the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee's **25th Report, paragraph23**, Ofcom's answer credits changes reflecting civil-society feedback **including OSAN**, giving the minimum-age clarification as its example. It also denies assigning greater weight to any stakeholder group. The Committee describes OSAN's formal submission and publishes Ofcom/DSIT responses; it records OSAN's continuing dissatisfaction at **24** and says at **26** it does not adjudicate the competing arguments. This is stronger evidence of recognized contribution than similar wording or a meeting. It is weaker than an exact accepted-edit record or proof OSAN originated the measure. SLSC report, paragraphs11,23–26 (see source references) Report publication date (see source references)\n\nThe July response's inspected age-assurance section does not contain the exact minimum-age formulation; text searches of both published OSAN response files also returned no exact “minimum age” match. That negative is limited by PDF extraction and terminology. The April statement's nearby stakeholder footnotes do not uniquely identify an OSAN sentence behind this edit. Consequently, retain the edge as **Ofcom publicly credited OSAN among contributing civil-society respondents**, not **Ofcom adopted Woods/Walsh's specified minimum-age clause**.\n\n## Authority and chronology boundaries for integration\n\nThe network is a submitter and advocate in these records. Woods and Walsh are named authors of the July response, not thereby statutory committee members or holders of regulatory approval rights. Targeted Ofcom searches did not establish a formal appointment for either; an unrelated result names **Siobhan Walsh**, not Maeve Walsh. This pass makes no claim that no formal role exists anywhere.\n\nThe November2023 consultation title describes the consultation's opening period, not the response date. The illegal-harms response itself says February2024. Ofcom's current consultation page displays **20 November 2024** alongside the main response download; that is not treated as its submission date. Ofcom consultation chronology and response listing (see source references)\n\nThe reported decisions are historical **December2024 / April–May2025** decisions. They are not presented as a complete current-law statement on 9 September2026. A later review must distinguish a subsequent change from reversal of these attributed decisions.\n\nSuggested precise relations for root, without creating canonical entries here:\n\n| Relation | Record-supported verb and limit |\n| --- | --- |\n| OSAN → February2024 illegal-harms response | Submitted an identified consultation response; exact day not established |\n| Ofcom → OSAN inference proposal | Declined proposed interpretation in published December2024 response |\n| Ofcom → OSAN search-scope concern | Acknowledged and reported amending risk-register wording; statutory scope retained |\n| Woods + Walsh → July2024 response | Named co-authors |\n| Ofcom → OSAN / minimum-age clarification | Publicly credited OSAN among contributors in May2025; no exclusive or verbatim authorship proof |\n| OSAN → SLSC | Formal submission considered during scrutiny; this confers no committee membership or adjudicatory power |\n\n## Source custody and actual reading scope\n\n**Retained reader capture:** `uk-disposition-reader-extracts.json`, SHA256 **c15aa176a8a012bfe25cb819787c8c6661d30a1e10ce697234cd06d35d1c22cc**. It contains the three scoped public web-reader result groups. It is a derivative text capture, **not the original PDFs and not their hashes**. Context returned by the reader extends beyond the selected paragraphs; no complete-volume audit is claimed. The operative passages inspected are listed above.\n\n**Retained original:** `uk-disposition-woods-icjg-2024.pdf`, ordinary public GET200, **2,062,645 bytes**, SHA256 **4097e729563bd10b42046cc8d5392c2d5a688aef8a11d5ea219a7df18bec530f**, nine pages. Source: network-hosted article PDF (see source references) Text extraction did not expose the relevant heading; this PDF has not been visually audited and is not the evidential basis of the article summary. The corresponding public HTML was successfully read through ordinary GET, including the named author/date and civil-threshold section.\n\nOfcom's full February response was read through the public PDF reader at pp1–2,25–27 and97 plus date searches. July response2 was read at pp1–6 and66–69, with surrounding reader context; response1's cover/initial sections were read and an exact-term search performed. Ofcom's December Volume3 was read at cover and2.18–2.21; Annex1 at cover andA1.9.9–10 with surrounding search-moderation context. April Volume3 was read at cover and8.169–8.179. SLSC report was read at paragraphs11 and17–26 plus publication metadata.\n\n**Access gaps:** the separate Ofcom “Our approach to developing Codes measures” PDF gave a reader error and ordinary GET403; that acquisition branch is closed and no unseen safe-harbour disposition from it is claimed. Network HTML initially failed through the web reader but ordinary GET succeeded. A direct Parliament HTML capture returned403; its public reader text was accessible and retained. No access controls were bypassed. No original Ofcom PDF hash is supplied. No visual proof of fine layout, handwritten annotation or hidden/redacted text is asserted.\n\n## Coherent stopping point and next separating record\n\nThe three decisions satisfy this run's contribution-to-disposition test: an adverse interpretation decision, an expressly reported amendment, and regulator-attributed contribution to a concrete guidance clarification. No further acquisition is needed before the parent's whole-case reassessment.\n\nThe most useful next record is **Ofcom's consultation-response coding/decision log or drafting version comparison for April2025 paragraph8.171**, with the cited OSAN input and approval trail. Custodian: Ofcom's online-safety policy team / consultation records function. It would separate collective feedback attribution from the exact authorship and decisive influence of a particular proposal. For the search issue, the already published final Register24.10–24.14 and its consultation predecessor would resolve the small remaining text-diff question. Neither missing record warrants claiming that influence was absent; neither is needed to invent donor instruction or a veto. No request or outreach was made.\n",
        "file": "research/disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-disposition.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition",
        "title": "Reset UK: the control categories have an identifiable historical origin",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. A bounded comparison of the 2023 incorporation record, the previously read May2025 replacement constitution, and the April2026 Scott change notice. This reduces one ambiguity without pretending to settle the current member register.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. A bounded comparison of the 2023 incorporation record, the previously read May2025 replacement constitution, and the April2026 Scott change notice. This reduces one ambiguity without pretending to settle the current member register.</p>\n<p>The [incorporation filing](http[local research file] expressly adopts the guarantee-company model articles in full (PDF2). Its memorandum lists <strong>Dale Benjamin Scott as the sole subscriber</strong> (PDF10); the guarantee statement names him alone (PDF8). The initial PSC record already reports at least75% voting rights and the right to appoint/remove a board majority (PDF7). These were not newly invented in the2025 replacement or2026 change notice. Appointment as a director did not itself make every director a member under the old general model; do not count directors as historical members.</p>\n<p>Companies House identifies the [applicable model articles](http[local research file] as applying to companies incorporated after28April2013. Article21 requires application and director approval for membership;17 permits director appointment by ordinary resolution or board decision;4 gives members a special-resolution reserve power. Those rules are compatible with an initial sole-member position despite two directors. They do not prove that no additional member was admitted beforeMay2025. The current official reproduction was read, not a separately certified2023 copy.</p>\n<p>The previously acquired7May2025 resolution is signed by Scott as voting member and replaces the constitution. New article22 makes directors the only members, with admission automatic on appointment;24.2 gives each member one vote on written resolutions. Wood&#x27;s PSC notification begins on the same7May date. Together these are concrete evidence consistent with a membership transition. The new constitution does not repeat a named Scott reserve. Current PSC percentages still require reconciliation; they must not be added together or confidently replaced by a50/50 figure.</p>\n<p>The [April2026 PSC04](http[local research file] effective27June2025, changes service-address/residence details. Both pages were read. It supplies <strong>no new nature-of-control statement</strong>, so treating this filing as fresh substantive reaffirmation of Scott&#x27;s old voting percentage would overstate it. No personal address or birth detail is reproduced here.</p>\n<p>The best supported explanation now is historical sole-subscriber control followed by a constitution that connects membership to the board, with the displayed PSC categories not reconciled by the records at hand. Alternative arrangements remain possible. The latest member register, PSC basis and any separate voting/appointment instrument would decide the remaining question. No approach to the company has been made. This branch closes at the public-record breakpoint; it should no longer be presented as unexplained overlapping ownership.</p>\n<p>Custody: originals/root-manifest.json retains URLs, bytes and hashes for both PDFs. Root read extracted operative passages in the incorporation filing and visually inspected its memorandum/guarantee pages and both PSC04 pages. The web reader failed on stale redirect/cache; one ordinary GET per observed stable public endpoint succeeded. There was no use of credentials or expired signed tokens. The ten-page incorporation filing incorporates the general model by reference rather than reproducing all its clauses. Further policy acquisition remains with the two independent workers; root does not open another branch before their forest review.</p>",
        "path": "disposition-wave-2026-09-09/uk-rights-transition.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-incorporation",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-psc04",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-model"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. A bounded comparison of the 2023 incorporation record, the previously read May2025 replacement constitution, and the April2026 Scott change notice. This reduces one ambiguity without pretending to settle the current member register.\n\nThe incorporation filing (see source references) expressly adopts the guarantee-company model articles in full (PDF2). Its memorandum lists **Dale Benjamin Scott as the sole subscriber** (PDF10); the guarantee statement names him alone (PDF8). The initial PSC record already reports at least75% voting rights and the right to appoint/remove a board majority (PDF7). These were not newly invented in the2025 replacement or2026 change notice. Appointment as a director did not itself make every director a member under the old general model; do not count directors as historical members.\n\nCompanies House identifies the applicable model articles (see source references) as applying to companies incorporated after28April2013. Article21 requires application and director approval for membership;17 permits director appointment by ordinary resolution or board decision;4 gives members a special-resolution reserve power. Those rules are compatible with an initial sole-member position despite two directors. They do not prove that no additional member was admitted beforeMay2025. The current official reproduction was read, not a separately certified2023 copy.\n\nThe previously acquired7May2025 resolution is signed by Scott as voting member and replaces the constitution. New article22 makes directors the only members, with admission automatic on appointment;24.2 gives each member one vote on written resolutions. Wood's PSC notification begins on the same7May date. Together these are concrete evidence consistent with a membership transition. The new constitution does not repeat a named Scott reserve. Current PSC percentages still require reconciliation; they must not be added together or confidently replaced by a50/50 figure.\n\nThe April2026 PSC04 (see source references) effective27June2025, changes service-address/residence details. Both pages were read. It supplies **no new nature-of-control statement**, so treating this filing as fresh substantive reaffirmation of Scott's old voting percentage would overstate it. No personal address or birth detail is reproduced here.\n\nThe best supported explanation now is historical sole-subscriber control followed by a constitution that connects membership to the board, with the displayed PSC categories not reconciled by the records at hand. Alternative arrangements remain possible. The latest member register, PSC basis and any separate voting/appointment instrument would decide the remaining question. No approach to the company has been made. This branch closes at the public-record breakpoint; it should no longer be presented as unexplained overlapping ownership.\n\nCustody: originals/root-manifest.json retains URLs, bytes and hashes for both PDFs. Root read extracted operative passages in the incorporation filing and visually inspected its memorandum/guarantee pages and both PSC04 pages. The web reader failed on stale redirect/cache; one ordinary GET per observed stable public endpoint succeeded. There was no use of credentials or expired signed tokens. The ten-page incorporation filing incorporates the general model by reference rather than reproducing all its clauses. Further policy acquisition remains with the two independent workers; root does not open another branch before their forest review.\n",
        "file": "research/disposition-wave-2026-09-09-uk-rights-transition.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism",
        "title": "AliExpress public-data access: binding duties and an appointed monitor",
        "description": "Bounded instrument lane closed, 9 September 2026. Two directly associated official PDF originals acquired: the public version of the adopted decision with its commitment annex, and the Commission's monitoring-trustee notice. No live API, researcher application or third-party data was accessed. Root owns the announcements and current-status/fine review.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded instrument lane closed, 9 September 2026. Two directly associated official PDF originals acquired: the public version of the adopted decision with its commitment annex, and the Commission&#x27;s monitoring-trustee notice. No live API, researcher application or third-party data was accessed. Root owns the announcements and current-status/fine review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"binding-status-and-the-correct-parties\">Binding status and the correct parties</h2>\n<p>[Commission Decision C(2025) 3982 final, 18 June 2025](http[local research file] makes the annexed commitments binding under DSA Article 71. Its addressees are <strong>AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.</strong> and <strong>Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited</strong> (Articles 1–3, PDF 50–51 / decision pages 47–48). Do not replace the latter with the similarly named prospective successor mentioned in the procedural history.</p>\n<p>The decision closes the covered proceedings except the specified illegal-content risk-assessment/mitigation grievance in case DSA.100117. The researcher-access section describes suspicions, not an adjudicated Article 40(12) infringement; the annex expressly preserves non-admission (PDF 44–47, recitals 156–164; PDF 54 / annex page 3). Binding acceptance is an actual intervention, but it is neither an infringement finding on access nor proof of fulfilled access.</p>\n<p>The official 78-page copy states that confidential material was edited or replaced with summaries/omissions. Its metadata was generated in February 2026; that is not the decision date or receipt date. It is a public edited copy, not an unredacted instrument.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-research-access-obligation\">The research-access obligation</h2>\n<p>The operative instrument is <strong>Annex Section B.V, paragraphs 1–7</strong>, PDF <strong>64–66 / annex pages 13–15</strong>. It concerns <strong>publicly accessible data under Article 40(12)</strong>. It does not award vetted internal-data access under Article 40(4), trusted-flagger status, or access to a named research organisation.</p>\n<p>AliExpress must maintain an exception to its general data-access restrictions for qualifying researchers, limited to systemic-risk research and applicable researcher terms. It must maintain a portal with dataset information, field explanations, tool instructions and an intake route; machine-readable access and reasonable downloads to researchers&#x27; own devices; near-real-time API access for readily available datasets; and gradual expansion informed by frequently requested datasets. The annex&#x27;s examples include advertisements, stores/products and product/seller penalties. No such dataset was collected in this investigation.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Who performs the step</th>\n<th>Binding provision and precise timing</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Trained AliExpress staff</td>\n<td>B.V.3(i–ii): follow an internal SOP and assess eligibility within <strong>15 business days</strong>.</td>\n<td>Assessment is not automatic approval; the internal SOP was not acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Researcher / data warehouse team</td>\n<td>B.V.3(iii–iv): approved off-the-shelf access follows tool instructions; customised deployment is <strong>expected within 7 business days</strong>, with an express complex-development exception.</td>\n<td>Do not turn the expectation into an unconditional seven-day deadline.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AliExpress QA team</td>\n<td>B.V.6: monitor API stability, transmitted-data accuracy and median application processing time; conduct quarterly retrieval, reconciliation and API tests.</td>\n<td>These are required checks, not acquired test results.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AliExpress → trustee</td>\n<td>B.V.7: semiannual metrics/test reports, counts received/processed/approved/rejected, and researcher-feedback summaries.</td>\n<td>No actual report, count or recipient list was acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The dedicated feedback email and the trustee&#x27;s third-party query route are real stated channels. They are not an acquired adjudicatory appeal procedure for a denied research application. Do not import the decision&#x27;s separate consumer/content-moderation complaint mechanism as that remedy.</p>\n<h2 id=\"appointment-and-limits-of-the-monitor\">Appointment and limits of the monitor</h2>\n<p>The [official one-page trustee notice](http[local research file] states that the Commission approved <strong>Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited</strong> on <strong>23 September 2025</strong>. It identifies monitoring and reporting to the Commission as the role and permits third-party queries. This establishes a named appointment-approval step. It does not prove that a particular report was delivered, accepted or acted on, nor disclose fees paid.</p>\n<p>The authority allocation is unusually explicit. AliExpress proposes the trustee/mandate and pays fees that must not depend on monitoring results; the Commission approves or rejects, may modify the mandate, and may issue orders/instructions to ensure compliance (C.1–5, PDF 74–75). Independence includes a 12-month restriction on related non-monitoring services before and after, and a limit on prior consecutive monitoring service; ordinary Article 37 audit service is distinguished. No separate independence assessment or executed remuneration terms were acquired.</p>\n<p>The trustee may recommend compliance measures and must promptly report reasonably concluded failure, without waiting for scheduled reports. It <strong>may not make technical/product/business decisions or exercise the Commission&#x27;s investigative powers</strong> (C.12–13, PDF 76–77). Advance notice of potentially adverse material changes expressly <strong>does not require trustee approval</strong>, and experimental/beta/testing changes are excepted (C.17). Necessary-information access is bounded by its mandate and coordination with the auditor; the Commission resolves disagreement over the information process within 14 calendar days (C.12(iii), C.15–16). Confidentiality, specific permitted audit-document sharing, and restrictions on public statements apply (C.13–14). A privately paid monitor is not thereby a private regulator with platform-management powers.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-clocks-and-two-textual-issues-worth-retaining\">The clocks, and two textual issues worth retaining</h2>\n<p>The Effective Date is <strong>receipt of the decision</strong>, not automatically 18 June (definitions, PDF 55; Section E, PDF 78). No receipt record was acquired. The initial implementation period runs to <strong>30 September 2025</strong>, with best-efforts compliance during rollout; thereafter obligations apply in full (C.10, PDF 75–76). The first trustee report was due within two months after that cycle; subsequent reports cover cycles ending <strong>30 September 2026</strong> and <strong>30 September 2027</strong> (C.12(iv), PDF 76; recitals 167–171, PDF 48). Their existence or delivery is not established here.</p>\n<p>The substantive measures run <strong>five years from receipt</strong>. The trustee mandate runs through its final report on the cycle ending September 2027. C.7–8 allow replacement/discharge and handover; they do not expressly create automatic renewal beyond that reporting period. Section D allows the Commission to waive, modify or substitute commitments if DSA conditions no longer justify undiminished continuation. This is not treated as an exercised extension or a general renewal right.</p>\n<p>Two source-text issues remain visible. <strong>C.9, PDF 75, prints “31 November 2027,” an impossible date.</strong> Recital 167 instead says 30 November, and C.12(iv) expresses the deadline as two months after 30 September. This was visually verified and is not silently normalized. Separately, recital 174 (PDF 49) says internal QA continues through the five-year term; Section D (PDF 78) says all monitoring/reporting obligations lapse when the commitments expire at final-report submission, while other substantive measures continue for five years. The decision&#x27;s stated continuing-QA expectation and the annex&#x27;s broader lapse wording should both be retained; this lane does not resolve their legal interpretation.</p>\n<p>That issue does not imply all independent oversight ends in 2027: the decision separately points to continuing DSA risk assessment and Article 37 independent audit obligations (recital 174). The specific trustee, internal QA and general DSA audit are different mechanisms.</p>\n<h2 id=\"fulfilment-and-enforcement-boundary\">Fulfilment and enforcement boundary</h2>\n<p>Recital 9 (PDF 6) describes pre-decision changes to AliExpress&#x27; transparency tools, including research-access options and downloads. This is an official historical implementation account, not an audit that every annex obligation was satisfied. The trustee approval provides a further concrete implementation step. No actual application decision, data delivery, QA report, trustee report or Commission acceptance of performance was acquired.</p>\n<p>For breach, recital 180 expressly preserves reopening under Article 71(2). The decision does not impose an access-related monetary fine. Root&#x27;s separate current-status reading identifies the <strong>20 July 2026 EUR 550 million</strong> announcement as concerning illegal-product risk assessment/mitigation outside the settled grievances; it must not be used as proof of researcher-access breach or trustee failure. That later announcement, its full infringement decision, payment and appeal status are outside this worker&#x27;s two-original acquisition scope.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-frontier-and-custody\">Finite frontier and custody</h2>\n<p>The highest-value next record is the <strong>first trustee report due in November 2025</strong>, together with the underlying B.V.7 researcher-access statistics/feedback and the Commission&#x27;s response. These would test whether the process opened access, denied it and why, or triggered correction. Known holders are AliExpress, Ankura and the Commission. The internal researcher-assessment SOP and executed trustee mandate/fees are also specific gaps. No missing record is assumed nonexistent and no holder was contacted.</p>\n<p>Originals: <code>ali-decision.pdf</code> (78 pages, scoped read) and <code>ali-trustee.pdf</code> (one page, full text and visual read). Decision text scope: PDF 1–6, 44–51, 53–56, 64–66, 74–78. Decision images actually viewed: 65, 66, 74, 75, 77, 78. Other page-level keyword hits were only used to select these sections; a full-document extraction is not a full read. Both original GETs returned PDFs after the reader failed with Unicode decoding errors. No additional acquisition or retry followed. Exact metadata, hashes and ancestry are in <code>ali-captures.json</code>; no graph or packaging edits.</p>",
        "path": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09/commitment-mechanism.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-decision",
          "w33-con-s-trustee"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded instrument lane closed, 9 September 2026. Two directly associated official PDF originals acquired: the public version of the adopted decision with its commitment annex, and the Commission's monitoring-trustee notice. No live API, researcher application or third-party data was accessed. Root owns the announcements and current-status/fine review.\n\n## Binding status and the correct parties\n\nCommission Decision C(2025) 3982 final, 18 June 2025 (see source references) makes the annexed commitments binding under DSA Article 71. Its addressees are **AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V.** and **Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Limited** (Articles 1–3, PDF 50–51 / decision pages 47–48). Do not replace the latter with the similarly named prospective successor mentioned in the procedural history.\n\nThe decision closes the covered proceedings except the specified illegal-content risk-assessment/mitigation grievance in case DSA.100117. The researcher-access section describes suspicions, not an adjudicated Article 40(12) infringement; the annex expressly preserves non-admission (PDF 44–47, recitals 156–164; PDF 54 / annex page 3). Binding acceptance is an actual intervention, but it is neither an infringement finding on access nor proof of fulfilled access.\n\nThe official 78-page copy states that confidential material was edited or replaced with summaries/omissions. Its metadata was generated in February 2026; that is not the decision date or receipt date. It is a public edited copy, not an unredacted instrument.\n\n## The research-access obligation\n\nThe operative instrument is **Annex Section B.V, paragraphs 1–7**, PDF **64–66 / annex pages 13–15**. It concerns **publicly accessible data under Article 40(12)**. It does not award vetted internal-data access under Article 40(4), trusted-flagger status, or access to a named research organisation.\n\nAliExpress must maintain an exception to its general data-access restrictions for qualifying researchers, limited to systemic-risk research and applicable researcher terms. It must maintain a portal with dataset information, field explanations, tool instructions and an intake route; machine-readable access and reasonable downloads to researchers' own devices; near-real-time API access for readily available datasets; and gradual expansion informed by frequently requested datasets. The annex's examples include advertisements, stores/products and product/seller penalties. No such dataset was collected in this investigation.\n\n| Who performs the step | Binding provision and precise timing | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Trained AliExpress staff | B.V.3(i–ii): follow an internal SOP and assess eligibility within **15 business days**. | Assessment is not automatic approval; the internal SOP was not acquired. |\n| Researcher / data warehouse team | B.V.3(iii–iv): approved off-the-shelf access follows tool instructions; customised deployment is **expected within 7 business days**, with an express complex-development exception. | Do not turn the expectation into an unconditional seven-day deadline. |\n| AliExpress QA team | B.V.6: monitor API stability, transmitted-data accuracy and median application processing time; conduct quarterly retrieval, reconciliation and API tests. | These are required checks, not acquired test results. |\n| AliExpress → trustee | B.V.7: semiannual metrics/test reports, counts received/processed/approved/rejected, and researcher-feedback summaries. | No actual report, count or recipient list was acquired. |\n\nThe dedicated feedback email and the trustee's third-party query route are real stated channels. They are not an acquired adjudicatory appeal procedure for a denied research application. Do not import the decision's separate consumer/content-moderation complaint mechanism as that remedy.\n\n## Appointment and limits of the monitor\n\nThe official one-page trustee notice (see source references) states that the Commission approved **Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited** on **23 September 2025**. It identifies monitoring and reporting to the Commission as the role and permits third-party queries. This establishes a named appointment-approval step. It does not prove that a particular report was delivered, accepted or acted on, nor disclose fees paid.\n\nThe authority allocation is unusually explicit. AliExpress proposes the trustee/mandate and pays fees that must not depend on monitoring results; the Commission approves or rejects, may modify the mandate, and may issue orders/instructions to ensure compliance (C.1–5, PDF 74–75). Independence includes a 12-month restriction on related non-monitoring services before and after, and a limit on prior consecutive monitoring service; ordinary Article 37 audit service is distinguished. No separate independence assessment or executed remuneration terms were acquired.\n\nThe trustee may recommend compliance measures and must promptly report reasonably concluded failure, without waiting for scheduled reports. It **may not make technical/product/business decisions or exercise the Commission's investigative powers** (C.12–13, PDF 76–77). Advance notice of potentially adverse material changes expressly **does not require trustee approval**, and experimental/beta/testing changes are excepted (C.17). Necessary-information access is bounded by its mandate and coordination with the auditor; the Commission resolves disagreement over the information process within 14 calendar days (C.12(iii), C.15–16). Confidentiality, specific permitted audit-document sharing, and restrictions on public statements apply (C.13–14). A privately paid monitor is not thereby a private regulator with platform-management powers.\n\n## The clocks, and two textual issues worth retaining\n\nThe Effective Date is **receipt of the decision**, not automatically 18 June (definitions, PDF 55; Section E, PDF 78). No receipt record was acquired. The initial implementation period runs to **30 September 2025**, with best-efforts compliance during rollout; thereafter obligations apply in full (C.10, PDF 75–76). The first trustee report was due within two months after that cycle; subsequent reports cover cycles ending **30 September 2026** and **30 September 2027** (C.12(iv), PDF 76; recitals 167–171, PDF 48). Their existence or delivery is not established here.\n\nThe substantive measures run **five years from receipt**. The trustee mandate runs through its final report on the cycle ending September 2027. C.7–8 allow replacement/discharge and handover; they do not expressly create automatic renewal beyond that reporting period. Section D allows the Commission to waive, modify or substitute commitments if DSA conditions no longer justify undiminished continuation. This is not treated as an exercised extension or a general renewal right.\n\nTwo source-text issues remain visible. **C.9, PDF 75, prints “31 November 2027,” an impossible date.** Recital 167 instead says 30 November, and C.12(iv) expresses the deadline as two months after 30 September. This was visually verified and is not silently normalized. Separately, recital 174 (PDF 49) says internal QA continues through the five-year term; Section D (PDF 78) says all monitoring/reporting obligations lapse when the commitments expire at final-report submission, while other substantive measures continue for five years. The decision's stated continuing-QA expectation and the annex's broader lapse wording should both be retained; this lane does not resolve their legal interpretation.\n\nThat issue does not imply all independent oversight ends in 2027: the decision separately points to continuing DSA risk assessment and Article 37 independent audit obligations (recital 174). The specific trustee, internal QA and general DSA audit are different mechanisms.\n\n## Fulfilment and enforcement boundary\n\nRecital 9 (PDF 6) describes pre-decision changes to AliExpress' transparency tools, including research-access options and downloads. This is an official historical implementation account, not an audit that every annex obligation was satisfied. The trustee approval provides a further concrete implementation step. No actual application decision, data delivery, QA report, trustee report or Commission acceptance of performance was acquired.\n\nFor breach, recital 180 expressly preserves reopening under Article 71(2). The decision does not impose an access-related monetary fine. Root's separate current-status reading identifies the **20 July 2026 EUR 550 million** announcement as concerning illegal-product risk assessment/mitigation outside the settled grievances; it must not be used as proof of researcher-access breach or trustee failure. That later announcement, its full infringement decision, payment and appeal status are outside this worker's two-original acquisition scope.\n\n## Finite frontier and custody\n\nThe highest-value next record is the **first trustee report due in November 2025**, together with the underlying B.V.7 researcher-access statistics/feedback and the Commission's response. These would test whether the process opened access, denied it and why, or triggered correction. Known holders are AliExpress, Ankura and the Commission. The internal researcher-assessment SOP and executed trustee mandate/fees are also specific gaps. No missing record is assumed nonexistent and no holder was contacted.\n\nOriginals: `ali-decision.pdf` (78 pages, scoped read) and `ali-trustee.pdf` (one page, full text and visual read). Decision text scope: PDF 1–6, 44–51, 53–56, 64–66, 74–78. Decision images actually viewed: 65, 66, 74, 75, 77, 78. Other page-level keyword hits were only used to select these sections; a full-document extraction is not a full read. Both original GETs returned PDFs after the reader failed with Unicode decoding errors. No additional acquisition or retry followed. Exact metadata, hashes and ancestry are in `ali-captures.json`; no graph or packaging edits.\n",
        "file": "research/dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings",
        "title": "A binding access obligation is not a proven delivery",
        "description": "Root announcement/current-status lane closed,9September2026. The Commission's18June2025 announcement (updated20June2025) describes legally binding AliExpress commitments on researcher access to public data: automated access/scraping, a dedicated API, customised datasets on request and information for researchers. It also describes internal monitoring and rep",
        "html": "<p>Root announcement/current-status lane closed,9September2026. The Commission&#x27;s18June2025 announcement (updated20June2025) describes legally binding AliExpress commitments on researcher access to public data: automated access/scraping, a dedicated API, customised datasets on request and information for researchers. It also describes internal monitoring and reports to an independent trustee. This is an account of an exercised Article71 commitment decision, not a particular researcher approval or measured implementation outcome. The worker acquired the actual decision and trustee appointment, which root separately reviewed within the scope below.</p>\n<p>The current official platform index identifies AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V., links the18June2025 decision and trustee record, and lists a20July2026 EUR550million fine. The index&#x27;s content says updated31August2026 while the footer says7September2026; neither is the date of each legal event. Reading here was limited to AliExpress&#x27;s actual entry, document links and those date fields. No full platform register audit.</p>\n<p>The fine has a distinct basis. The Commission&#x27;s French representation announcement,20July2026, says it concerns inadequate assessment and mitigation of risks from illegal, dangerous or counterfeit products. It explicitly separates those grievances from the2025 commitments. The current record therefore cannot be presented as a fine for refusing researcher access, evidence of failed trustee oversight, or GDI-driven enforcement. It describes conduct lasting at least untilJune2025; it does not state all later conduct was identical. The requested action plan is due20October2026. The full infringement decision, any appeal and payment of the fine were not acquired. This is the Commission&#x27;s published announcement, not an independent judicial finding or our reproduced product testing.</p>\n<p>The original presscorner URL linked by the index yielded zero reader lines and a34-character title-only derivative after ordinary GET. It is retained as an application shell, not as the press-release body. The same Commission&#x27;s French representation supplied a substantive original; root read the complete article in French. The French URL&#x27;s web reader separately returned a non-retryable unsafe-open error; the ordinary GET was already part of the same orchestration and succeeded. No further reader or fetch attempt followed. The public French page is the substantive source; shell bytes add no corroboration.</p>\n<p>Root supplemental decision reading, without reacquisition: ali-decision.pdf PDF1,48-51,54,64-66,74-78 text; PDF65 and78 visual. The initial combined text output truncated part ofPDF74; that page was reread separately. Ali-trustee.pdf complete one-page text and visual. All78decision pages are retained but not claimed read. These locators establish the15-business-day request assessment, customised-data7-business-day expectation with complex-development exception, access QA metrics, nominated/paid-but-Commission-approved trustee, notice-not-approval clause, reporting sunset and legal addressees. The appointment record names Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited, approved23September2025. Its actual mandate, invoices, work plan and reports were not acquired.</p>\n<p>A notable drafting issue should remain visible. Recital174 (PDF49) expects internal QA to continue through the five-year substantive term, while AnnexD (PDF78) says all monitoring/reporting obligations expire with the commitment period tied to the final trustee report. Article1 (PDF50) makes commitments binding for five years; AnnexD distinguishes the continued substantive measures from the reporting period. The report schedule and rationale limit the trustee mandate through the2027cycle; no finding that all independent oversight ends then follows, since the decision also points to ordinary Article37 audits. AnnexC9&#x27;s impossible31November2027 date is a textual typo identified by the worker; recital167 andC12(iv) express two months after30September2027. Root did not separately visually inspect the typo page. The approved mandate and actual compliance practice are the useful next instruments, not an invented resolution of that tension.</p>\n<p>No public-data access delivery, individual research approval, current API operation or GDI/AI4TRUST recipient relationship was tested. Root acquisition ends here; findings are supplemental outside r31 and the fixed r32 data candidate.</p>",
        "path": "dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09/root-enforcement-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-index",
          "w33-con-s-announcement",
          "w33-con-s-fine"
        ],
        "markdown": "Root announcement/current-status lane closed,9September2026. The Commission's18June2025 announcement (updated20June2025) describes legally binding AliExpress commitments on researcher access to public data: automated access/scraping, a dedicated API, customised datasets on request and information for researchers. It also describes internal monitoring and reports to an independent trustee. This is an account of an exercised Article71 commitment decision, not a particular researcher approval or measured implementation outcome. The worker acquired the actual decision and trustee appointment, which root separately reviewed within the scope below.\n\nThe current official platform index identifies AliExpress International (Netherlands) B.V., links the18June2025 decision and trustee record, and lists a20July2026 EUR550million fine. The index's content says updated31August2026 while the footer says7September2026; neither is the date of each legal event. Reading here was limited to AliExpress's actual entry, document links and those date fields. No full platform register audit.\n\nThe fine has a distinct basis. The Commission's French representation announcement,20July2026, says it concerns inadequate assessment and mitigation of risks from illegal, dangerous or counterfeit products. It explicitly separates those grievances from the2025 commitments. The current record therefore cannot be presented as a fine for refusing researcher access, evidence of failed trustee oversight, or GDI-driven enforcement. It describes conduct lasting at least untilJune2025; it does not state all later conduct was identical. The requested action plan is due20October2026. The full infringement decision, any appeal and payment of the fine were not acquired. This is the Commission's published announcement, not an independent judicial finding or our reproduced product testing.\n\nThe original presscorner URL linked by the index yielded zero reader lines and a34-character title-only derivative after ordinary GET. It is retained as an application shell, not as the press-release body. The same Commission's French representation supplied a substantive original; root read the complete article in French. The French URL's web reader separately returned a non-retryable unsafe-open error; the ordinary GET was already part of the same orchestration and succeeded. No further reader or fetch attempt followed. The public French page is the substantive source; shell bytes add no corroboration.\n\nRoot supplemental decision reading, without reacquisition: ali-decision.pdf PDF1,48-51,54,64-66,74-78 text; PDF65 and78 visual. The initial combined text output truncated part ofPDF74; that page was reread separately. Ali-trustee.pdf complete one-page text and visual. All78decision pages are retained but not claimed read. These locators establish the15-business-day request assessment, customised-data7-business-day expectation with complex-development exception, access QA metrics, nominated/paid-but-Commission-approved trustee, notice-not-approval clause, reporting sunset and legal addressees. The appointment record names Ankura Consulting (Europe), Limited, approved23September2025. Its actual mandate, invoices, work plan and reports were not acquired.\n\nA notable drafting issue should remain visible. Recital174 (PDF49) expects internal QA to continue through the five-year substantive term, while AnnexD (PDF78) says all monitoring/reporting obligations expire with the commitment period tied to the final trustee report. Article1 (PDF50) makes commitments binding for five years; AnnexD distinguishes the continued substantive measures from the reporting period. The report schedule and rationale limit the trustee mandate through the2027cycle; no finding that all independent oversight ends then follows, since the decision also points to ordinary Article37 audits. AnnexC9's impossible31November2027 date is a textual typo identified by the worker; recital167 andC12(iv) express two months after30September2027. Root did not separately visually inspect the typo page. The approved mandate and actual compliance practice are the useful next instruments, not an invented resolution of that tension.\n\nNo public-data access delivery, individual research approval, current API operation or GDI/AI4TRUST recipient relationship was tested. Root acquisition ends here; findings are supplemental outside r31 and the fixed r32 data candidate.\n",
        "file": "research/dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings",
        "title": "Research applications: reported reasons, incomplete decision records",
        "description": "Closed 9 September 2026 after the actual GDI → DSA40 Collaboratory link and three substantive public records: the current aggregate tracker, the September 2025 policy paper, and the linked issue tracker. These reveal applicant-reported validity disputes and a current pending AliExpress entry. They do not publish an identifiable AliExpress application/respons",
        "html": "<p>Closed 9 September 2026 after the actual GDI → DSA40 Collaboratory link and three substantive public records: the current aggregate tracker, the September 2025 policy paper, and the linked issue tracker. These reveal applicant-reported validity disputes and a current pending AliExpress entry. They do not publish an identifiable AliExpress application/response pair or establish whether a particular refusal was justified.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-observations-and-their-denominator\">Current observations and their denominator</h2>\n<p>[Tracker Insights](http[local research file] displays “last updated: 8. September 2026”. It reports 70 complete applications registered through its voluntary tracker; 51 decided, comprising 24 accepted and 27 rejected. Those are recorded application statuses, not verified data deliveries. “Complete” concerns the tracker&#x27;s recorded applications and does not independently establish that a platform received a legally sufficient submission.</p>\n<p>The platform table lists one <strong>AliExpress public-data application as open</strong>. It discloses no submission date, applicant, requested fields, response, paragraph, cure or subsequent outcome. No GDI identity is established. Public-data labelling alone is insufficient to reconstruct the actual legal channel used. This current entry cannot be matched to the confidential population in the separate FTI audit ending June 2025 or treated as a contradiction of that audit&#x27;s report of no approved applications.</p>\n<p>A narrow arithmetic check of the original HTML table gives 68 listed applications: 17 open, 27 rejected and 24 accepted. The decided totals match the headline; the table leaves two of the headline 70 unaccounted for. The page does not explain the difference. Do not silently add cases, infer missing outcomes or calculate population-wide success rates. Its narrative initially names fewer platforms than the displayed table; the table itself contains the AliExpress row. Original <code>applications-tracker.html</code>; full substantive text <code>applications-tracker.derived.txt</code>; exact table extraction <code>applications-tracker-table0.json</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-people-report-being-rejected-for\">What people report being rejected for</h2>\n<p>The same page&#x27;s <strong>Reasons for Rejection</strong> section provides an unattributed platform-style excerpt concerning systemic-risk purpose limitation, plus the following category counts. These are the organiser&#x27;s presentation of submitted information, not a bundle of publicly inspectable original platform letters.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Reported category</th>\n<th>Count</th>\n<th>Evidentiary limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Failure to confine research to the statutory purpose</td>\n<td>5</td>\n<td>Most common reason within the reasons presented; not proof every proposal was outside scope.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Necessity and proportionality</td>\n<td>2</td>\n<td>The requested data, platform reasoning and balancing are absent.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Incompleteness</td>\n<td>1</td>\n<td>Missing fields and any cure request are not identified.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Access request differed from application</td>\n<td>1</td>\n<td>The application/request pair is not published.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Required university affiliation</td>\n<td>1</td>\n<td>The organiser labels this an invalid reason during early implementation; no individual decision or adjudication is supplied.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Required EU location</td>\n<td>2</td>\n<td>Likewise an organiser assessment, with no original correspondence or outcome of a challenge.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These counts sum to 12, not all 27 reported refusals. The page does not identify which platforms or legal paragraphs produced each category, whether the categories overlap, or a complete coding frame. It separately says 27 entries provided application text and only 12 explicitly referred to Article 34. Those are different denominators and must not be equated with the 12 refusal-category counts. An explicit Article 34 citation is not by itself a demonstrated legal completeness test.</p>\n<p>The tracker mixes public and non-public requests. Its categories cannot all be assigned automatically to Article 40(12), or its non-public rows to completed Article 40(4) DSC proceedings. It reports platform decisions; it does not publish the original channel and chronology needed to classify each one. The displayed average decision delays are sample summaries and were not treated as statutory clocks or evidence of the AliExpress entry&#x27;s duration.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-study-describes-applicant-accounts-and-its-own-intervention\">The study describes applicant accounts and its own intervention</h2>\n<p>The actual [September 2025 policy paper](http[local research file] <em>Data Access for Researchers under the Digital Services Act: From Policy to Practice</em>, is Weizenbaum Policy Paper 14. The current publications index dates it 22 September 2025; the PDF cover and imprint give September 2025. It is not a fresh 2026 study of the tracker snapshot.</p>\n<p>PDF 12–13 / printed 11–12 expressly discuss Article 40(12). Researchers apply through platform-specific forms or email, with provider or surrogate vetting. The authors report varying information requirements, refusals based on EU residence, and lengthy exchanges requiring progressively narrower purposes or data scope. Footnote 24 describes forms ranging from 8 questions for Snap to 55 for Meta, including requests for phone number or date of birth in some forms. These are the paper&#x27;s dated accounts; this lane neither accessed those forms nor verified current requirements.</p>\n<p>The account distinguishes receiving access from receiving reliable data, reporting quality problems even after approval. It cites an earlier 2024 policy paper for the application obstacles rather than reproducing original letters. It proposes Commission guidance and codes of conduct; those are authors&#x27; proposed remedies, not an acquired cure procedure or a successful appeal. PDF 14–15 separately discuss privileged Article 40(4) access and data specificity; those legal explanations must not be used to recategorise the preceding Article 40(12) examples.</p>\n<p>PDF 35 / printed 34 expressly describes the Collaboratory tracker as <strong>researcher self-reporting</strong> and the project as offering application support. The entry page openly recruits researchers and non-profit organisations to share requests, with the stated aims of reporting success, helping applications and informing regulation. This is a self-selected sample from an advocacy/support network, not a random sample or a census of platform applications. The inspected sources give no response rate or independently sampled comparison population. Original application texts are apparently available for a subset of the submissions, but their submission to the organiser is not public release or independent verification here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"disclosed-resources-and-study-design-boundary\">Disclosed resources and study-design boundary</h2>\n<p>PDF 2 says the paper draws on the transnational network built by the Collaboratory, led by some of its authors, and calls it a joint project funded by <strong>“Mercator Stiftung”</strong> since early 2024. The retained homepage/publications HTML references a funder logo asset named <code>Stiftung-Mercator-Weiss-RGB.png</code>, with empty alt text. The logo image was not separately acquired or visually read. These observations identify the disclosed foundation name; no exact grantor legal suffix, amount, award agreement, payment or reserved approval right was acquired.</p>\n<p>The same page describes institutional funding of the Weizenbaum Institute by the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space and the State of Berlin. That institutional credit is not proof those bodies funded this particular study or determined the tracker&#x27;s categories. No funder approval, sampling instruction, editorial control or access to applicant records is disclosed in the inspected scopes. The authors&#x27; leadership, the project&#x27;s open recruitment and application-support mission do establish a closer organiser/study relationship than an independent audit of platform decisions. The paper also argues for more resources for researcher intermediaries (PDF 35–36); that is a stated policy position, not an awarded new resource.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-issue-list-adds-no-individual-refusal-record\">The issue list adds no individual refusal record</h2>\n<p>The linked [Issue Tracker](http[local research file] says submissions are checked by the organisers and may prompt follow-up. Its undated substantive body lists a past Meta application-submission interruption from December 2024 to April 2025 and a TikTok API data outage in January 2025. Its statement that it knows of no current critical issues is limited to the organisers&#x27; knowledge and this issue-list scope. It does not negate the separate application refusals or pending cases. No AliExpress refusal, cure, complaint, restored access or original response is published there. The linked external Meta page was not followed because it would expand beyond the selected three substantive records.</p>\n<h2 id=\"closed-routes-reading-scope-and-next-discriminator\">Closed routes, reading scope and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>The home and tracker pages each timed out in the ordinary web reader, then succeeded through one ordinary public GET. The linked April 2024 paper landing failed in the reader; its one GET alternative returned HTTP 200 <strong>BunkerWeb Bot Detection</strong> content at a challenge URL, requiring JavaScript. That is challenge HTML, not the paper. The route was closed without challenge completion, alternate mirror or DOI retry. The exact response, URL and hash remain in custody. No account, survey, form, contact, application or live platform test was used.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to arbitrary obstruction is that at least some requests failed legitimate eligibility, specificity or proportionality requirements. Conversely, a platform&#x27;s own label of incompleteness does not prove that its demands were necessary or its process offered a reasonable cure. The present aggregates cannot decide between those explanations for AliExpress or any other individual case.</p>\n<p>The most useful next record is an applicant-consented, dated and appropriately redacted application plus platform response, follow-up/cure exchange and final outcome, with the exact Article 40 paragraph and dataset request. A link from that pair to the tracker&#x27;s coding record would allow a real validity assessment. The Collaboratory/applicant would be expected holders for reported submissions and the platform for its decision record; no release or request is assumed. The root&#x27;s separate audit evidence remains a different period and source population. This lane closes without a finding that GDI submitted the tracked AliExpress request, that access was delivered, or that a refusal violated the DSA.</p>\n<p>Text reading: full substantive home and tracker bodies; current publications index entries/links; policy PDF 1–3, 12–15, 35–36 and 38 (plus the initial reader&#x27;s introductory/context scope through PDF 12, not a full-PDF read); full substantive Issue Tracker body. Full policy extraction is retained for root review but is not a claim every page was read. No images/charts were visually inspected; the tracker table was read from actual HTML text. Primary original hashes, exact paths and transport/read scopes are in <code>applications-captures.json</code>.</p>",
        "path": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09/application-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-entry",
          "w33-con-s-tracker",
          "w33-con-s-publications",
          "w33-con-s-paper",
          "w33-con-s-issues",
          "w33-con-s-paper2024"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed 9 September 2026 after the actual GDI → DSA40 Collaboratory link and three substantive public records: the current aggregate tracker, the September 2025 policy paper, and the linked issue tracker. These reveal applicant-reported validity disputes and a current pending AliExpress entry. They do not publish an identifiable AliExpress application/response pair or establish whether a particular refusal was justified.\n\n## Current observations and their denominator\n\nTracker Insights (see source references) displays “last updated: 8. September 2026”. It reports 70 complete applications registered through its voluntary tracker; 51 decided, comprising 24 accepted and 27 rejected. Those are recorded application statuses, not verified data deliveries. “Complete” concerns the tracker's recorded applications and does not independently establish that a platform received a legally sufficient submission.\n\nThe platform table lists one **AliExpress public-data application as open**. It discloses no submission date, applicant, requested fields, response, paragraph, cure or subsequent outcome. No GDI identity is established. Public-data labelling alone is insufficient to reconstruct the actual legal channel used. This current entry cannot be matched to the confidential population in the separate FTI audit ending June 2025 or treated as a contradiction of that audit's report of no approved applications.\n\nA narrow arithmetic check of the original HTML table gives 68 listed applications: 17 open, 27 rejected and 24 accepted. The decided totals match the headline; the table leaves two of the headline 70 unaccounted for. The page does not explain the difference. Do not silently add cases, infer missing outcomes or calculate population-wide success rates. Its narrative initially names fewer platforms than the displayed table; the table itself contains the AliExpress row. Original `applications-tracker.html`; full substantive text `applications-tracker.derived.txt`; exact table extraction `applications-tracker-table0.json`.\n\n## What people report being rejected for\n\nThe same page's **Reasons for Rejection** section provides an unattributed platform-style excerpt concerning systemic-risk purpose limitation, plus the following category counts. These are the organiser's presentation of submitted information, not a bundle of publicly inspectable original platform letters.\n\n| Reported category | Count | Evidentiary limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Failure to confine research to the statutory purpose | 5 | Most common reason within the reasons presented; not proof every proposal was outside scope. |\n| Necessity and proportionality | 2 | The requested data, platform reasoning and balancing are absent. |\n| Incompleteness | 1 | Missing fields and any cure request are not identified. |\n| Access request differed from application | 1 | The application/request pair is not published. |\n| Required university affiliation | 1 | The organiser labels this an invalid reason during early implementation; no individual decision or adjudication is supplied. |\n| Required EU location | 2 | Likewise an organiser assessment, with no original correspondence or outcome of a challenge. |\n\nThese counts sum to 12, not all 27 reported refusals. The page does not identify which platforms or legal paragraphs produced each category, whether the categories overlap, or a complete coding frame. It separately says 27 entries provided application text and only 12 explicitly referred to Article 34. Those are different denominators and must not be equated with the 12 refusal-category counts. An explicit Article 34 citation is not by itself a demonstrated legal completeness test.\n\nThe tracker mixes public and non-public requests. Its categories cannot all be assigned automatically to Article 40(12), or its non-public rows to completed Article 40(4) DSC proceedings. It reports platform decisions; it does not publish the original channel and chronology needed to classify each one. The displayed average decision delays are sample summaries and were not treated as statutory clocks or evidence of the AliExpress entry's duration.\n\n## The study describes applicant accounts and its own intervention\n\nThe actual September 2025 policy paper (see source references) *Data Access for Researchers under the Digital Services Act: From Policy to Practice*, is Weizenbaum Policy Paper 14. The current publications index dates it 22 September 2025; the PDF cover and imprint give September 2025. It is not a fresh 2026 study of the tracker snapshot.\n\nPDF 12–13 / printed 11–12 expressly discuss Article 40(12). Researchers apply through platform-specific forms or email, with provider or surrogate vetting. The authors report varying information requirements, refusals based on EU residence, and lengthy exchanges requiring progressively narrower purposes or data scope. Footnote 24 describes forms ranging from 8 questions for Snap to 55 for Meta, including requests for phone number or date of birth in some forms. These are the paper's dated accounts; this lane neither accessed those forms nor verified current requirements.\n\nThe account distinguishes receiving access from receiving reliable data, reporting quality problems even after approval. It cites an earlier 2024 policy paper for the application obstacles rather than reproducing original letters. It proposes Commission guidance and codes of conduct; those are authors' proposed remedies, not an acquired cure procedure or a successful appeal. PDF 14–15 separately discuss privileged Article 40(4) access and data specificity; those legal explanations must not be used to recategorise the preceding Article 40(12) examples.\n\nPDF 35 / printed 34 expressly describes the Collaboratory tracker as **researcher self-reporting** and the project as offering application support. The entry page openly recruits researchers and non-profit organisations to share requests, with the stated aims of reporting success, helping applications and informing regulation. This is a self-selected sample from an advocacy/support network, not a random sample or a census of platform applications. The inspected sources give no response rate or independently sampled comparison population. Original application texts are apparently available for a subset of the submissions, but their submission to the organiser is not public release or independent verification here.\n\n## Disclosed resources and study-design boundary\n\nPDF 2 says the paper draws on the transnational network built by the Collaboratory, led by some of its authors, and calls it a joint project funded by **“Mercator Stiftung”** since early 2024. The retained homepage/publications HTML references a funder logo asset named `Stiftung-Mercator-Weiss-RGB.png`, with empty alt text. The logo image was not separately acquired or visually read. These observations identify the disclosed foundation name; no exact grantor legal suffix, amount, award agreement, payment or reserved approval right was acquired.\n\nThe same page describes institutional funding of the Weizenbaum Institute by the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space and the State of Berlin. That institutional credit is not proof those bodies funded this particular study or determined the tracker's categories. No funder approval, sampling instruction, editorial control or access to applicant records is disclosed in the inspected scopes. The authors' leadership, the project's open recruitment and application-support mission do establish a closer organiser/study relationship than an independent audit of platform decisions. The paper also argues for more resources for researcher intermediaries (PDF 35–36); that is a stated policy position, not an awarded new resource.\n\n## The issue list adds no individual refusal record\n\nThe linked Issue Tracker (see source references) says submissions are checked by the organisers and may prompt follow-up. Its undated substantive body lists a past Meta application-submission interruption from December 2024 to April 2025 and a TikTok API data outage in January 2025. Its statement that it knows of no current critical issues is limited to the organisers' knowledge and this issue-list scope. It does not negate the separate application refusals or pending cases. No AliExpress refusal, cure, complaint, restored access or original response is published there. The linked external Meta page was not followed because it would expand beyond the selected three substantive records.\n\n## Closed routes, reading scope and next discriminator\n\nThe home and tracker pages each timed out in the ordinary web reader, then succeeded through one ordinary public GET. The linked April 2024 paper landing failed in the reader; its one GET alternative returned HTTP 200 **BunkerWeb Bot Detection** content at a challenge URL, requiring JavaScript. That is challenge HTML, not the paper. The route was closed without challenge completion, alternate mirror or DOI retry. The exact response, URL and hash remain in custody. No account, survey, form, contact, application or live platform test was used.\n\nThe strongest rival to arbitrary obstruction is that at least some requests failed legitimate eligibility, specificity or proportionality requirements. Conversely, a platform's own label of incompleteness does not prove that its demands were necessary or its process offered a reasonable cure. The present aggregates cannot decide between those explanations for AliExpress or any other individual case.\n\nThe most useful next record is an applicant-consented, dated and appropriately redacted application plus platform response, follow-up/cure exchange and final outcome, with the exact Article 40 paragraph and dataset request. A link from that pair to the tracker's coding record would allow a real validity assessment. The Collaboratory/applicant would be expected holders for reported submissions and the platform for its decision record; no release or request is assumed. The root's separate audit evidence remains a different period and source population. This lane closes without a finding that GDI submitted the tracked AliExpress request, that access was delivered, or that a refusal violated the DSA.\n\nText reading: full substantive home and tracker bodies; current publications index entries/links; policy PDF 1–3, 12–15, 35–36 and 38 (plus the initial reader's introductory/context scope through PDF 12, not a full-PDF read); full substantive Issue Tracker body. Full policy extraction is retained for root review but is not a claim every page was read. No images/charts were visually inspected; the tracker table was read from actual HTML text. Primary original hashes, exact paths and transport/read scopes are in `applications-captures.json`.\n",
        "file": "research/dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading",
        "title": "Root reading: researcher-side application evidence",
        "description": "9 September2026. Root read the complete substantive tracker page and its HTML table row/rowspan structure, the entry-page body, and the short issue-tracker body. Policy Paper14 (September2025) was text-read at PDF1-5,12-13,35-36 and38 only; no full38page reading or visual audit. The root webreader timed out on the tracker; already worker original supplied th",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Root read the complete substantive retained tracker page and its HTML table row/rowspan structure, the entry-page body, and the short issue-tracker body. Policy Paper14 (September2025) was text-read at PDF1-5,12-13,35-36 and38 only; no full38page reading or visual audit. The root webreader timed out on the tracker; already acquired worker original supplied the substantive reading. No fresh duplicate GET, account, survey submission or personal request records.</p>\n<p>The tracker updates to8September2026 and reports70 complete registered applications,51 decisions,24 acceptances and27 rejections. The HTML table actually sums to68:24 accepted,27 rejected,17 open. Its public/nonpublic categories sum to60 and8 respectively. The homepage reports61 public-data applications and70 overall; neither exactly matches the table. No explanation for the two-record difference was acquired. Treat the denominator as unreconciled; do not silently repair it, infer fraud, or compute a whole-platform acceptance rate. These are voluntarily reported applications, not an inventory of all requests to platforms.</p>\n<p>Its AliExpress row is one public-data entry marked open. The page supplies no application date, applicant identity, precise statutory paragraph, original text or correspondence for that entry. It cannot be matched to the prior FTI audit period or to GDI. More generally, requested public/nonpublic data is not enough to establish the legal route: Article40(4) can also be used for some public data. The policy paper separately discusses40(12) and40(4); it does not furnish individual tracker routing.</p>\n<p>The rejection section offers an unattributed purpose-limitation quotation and category counts. Purpose limitation5, necessity/proportionality2, incomplete1, request/application mismatch1, university-affiliation1, EU-location2 sum to12, not27 total rejections; coverage and possible overlap are unspecified. The organisers label the latter affiliation/location reasons invalid. That is their legal assessment, not an acquired ruling or visible application/response pair. Prior accepted legal text supports distinguishing eligibility criteria from blanket affiliation/location exclusions; it cannot decide an unacquired individual application. Only27 entries supplied application text, and12 explicitly mentioned Article34; neither this denominator nor listed methods/risks describes all70 registrations. Categories can overlap and are not demonstrated decision causes.</p>\n<p>The issue page&#x27;s separate statements concern practical availability and quality. It currently reports no known critical issues, while listing historical Meta submission unavailability and TikTok API missing data. These are organiser-verified issue accounts with no supporting incident logs read here. Lack of a current listed critical issue does not mean every application succeeds or every dataset is complete. Authorisation, technically usable delivery and researcher judgment remain separate steps.</p>\n<p>PolicyPDF2 attributes this joint Collaboratory project to Mercator Stiftung funding and says some paper authors lead it. The Weizenbaum Institute&#x27;s separate institutional funding statement names the German federal ministry (BMFTR) and State of Berlin. A project grant and host-institution support are different resources; no amounts, donor conditions or reviewer rights are disclosed in these pages. The title-page author list and current homepage team are different dated roles and should not be collapsed into identical governance.</p>\n<p>PDF35 explicitly describes researcher self-reporting, application support and emerging intermediaries; it advocates active EU/member-state support for such roles. This is a substantive institutional connection: the same initiative gathers reports, helps applicants, and informs regulatory discussion. It makes the dataset valuable for finding failure cases and clarifying process, while also requiring attention to self-selection and advocacy context. It is neither a regulator&#x27;s adjudication log nor inherently disqualified by its advocacy. The page identifies other networks as examples, without proving funding, control or case-specific coordination among them.</p>\n<p>This run still lacks the desired public application/response pair. The acquired records narrow the validity question to identifiable tests and separate evidentiary layers. The next acquisition must follow the forest review after this packet closes; no expansion to all listed networks is authorized by this note alone.</p>\n<p>Root continuation also text-read PDF12-13 (provider or surrogate vetting; dated reported application obstacles, remedies proposed),36 (advocacy for sustained public funding) and38 (imprint and CC BY4.0). The original application/response bundle remains unacquired. Explicit table arithmetic corrected an initial unaccepted root assumption that the homepage public-data count matched the table; actual60public/8nonpublic are preserved above. This was a root synthesis correction, not a change to source data or the worker&#x27;s correct68/70 finding.</p>",
        "path": "dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09/root-reading.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Root read the complete substantive retained tracker page and its HTML table row/rowspan structure, the entry-page body, and the short issue-tracker body. Policy Paper14 (September2025) was text-read at PDF1-5,12-13,35-36 and38 only; no full38page reading or visual audit. The root webreader timed out on the tracker; already acquired worker original supplied the substantive reading. No fresh duplicate GET, account, survey submission or personal request records.\n\nThe tracker updates to8September2026 and reports70 complete registered applications,51 decisions,24 acceptances and27 rejections. The HTML table actually sums to68:24 accepted,27 rejected,17 open. Its public/nonpublic categories sum to60 and8 respectively. The homepage reports61 public-data applications and70 overall; neither exactly matches the table. No explanation for the two-record difference was acquired. Treat the denominator as unreconciled; do not silently repair it, infer fraud, or compute a whole-platform acceptance rate. These are voluntarily reported applications, not an inventory of all requests to platforms.\n\nIts AliExpress row is one public-data entry marked open. The page supplies no application date, applicant identity, precise statutory paragraph, original text or correspondence for that entry. It cannot be matched to the prior FTI audit period or to GDI. More generally, requested public/nonpublic data is not enough to establish the legal route: Article40(4) can also be used for some public data. The policy paper separately discusses40(12) and40(4); it does not furnish individual tracker routing.\n\nThe rejection section offers an unattributed purpose-limitation quotation and category counts. Purpose limitation5, necessity/proportionality2, incomplete1, request/application mismatch1, university-affiliation1, EU-location2 sum to12, not27 total rejections; coverage and possible overlap are unspecified. The organisers label the latter affiliation/location reasons invalid. That is their legal assessment, not an acquired ruling or visible application/response pair. Prior accepted legal text supports distinguishing eligibility criteria from blanket affiliation/location exclusions; it cannot decide an unacquired individual application. Only27 entries supplied application text, and12 explicitly mentioned Article34; neither this denominator nor listed methods/risks describes all70 registrations. Categories can overlap and are not demonstrated decision causes.\n\nThe issue page's separate statements concern practical availability and quality. It currently reports no known critical issues, while listing historical Meta submission unavailability and TikTok API missing data. These are organiser-verified issue accounts with no supporting incident logs read here. Lack of a current listed critical issue does not mean every application succeeds or every dataset is complete. Authorisation, technically usable delivery and researcher judgment remain separate steps.\n\nPolicyPDF2 attributes this joint Collaboratory project to Mercator Stiftung funding and says some paper authors lead it. The Weizenbaum Institute's separate institutional funding statement names the German federal ministry (BMFTR) and State of Berlin. A project grant and host-institution support are different resources; no amounts, donor conditions or reviewer rights are disclosed in these pages. The title-page author list and current homepage team are different dated roles and should not be collapsed into identical governance.\n\nPDF35 explicitly describes researcher self-reporting, application support and emerging intermediaries; it advocates active EU/member-state support for such roles. This is a substantive institutional connection: the same initiative gathers reports, helps applicants, and informs regulatory discussion. It makes the dataset valuable for finding failure cases and clarifying process, while also requiring attention to self-selection and advocacy context. It is neither a regulator's adjudication log nor inherently disqualified by its advocacy. The page identifies other networks as examples, without proving funding, control or case-specific coordination among them.\n\nThis run still lacks the desired public application/response pair. The acquired records narrow the validity question to identifiable tests and separate evidentiary layers. The next acquisition must follow the forest review after this packet closes; no expansion to all listed networks is authorized by this note alone.\n\nRoot continuation also text-read PDF12-13 (provider or surrogate vetting; dated reported application obstacles, remedies proposed),36 (advocacy for sustained public funding) and38 (imprint and CC BY4.0). The original application/response bundle remains unacquired. Explicit table arithmetic corrected an initial unaccepted root assumption that the homepage public-data count matched the table; actual60public/8nonpublic are preserved above. This was a root synthesis correction, not a change to source data or the worker's correct68/70 finding.\n",
        "file": "research/dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings",
        "title": "DSA research access: the decision-maker is identifiable; a GDI approval is not established",
        "description": "Bounded official-source check closed on 9 September 2026. Two original HTML responses retained: one substantive Commission FAQ and the public portal's application shell. No login, application, data query or live platform experiment. Root independently owns the adopted Article 40 and delegated-rule reading; this lane reports explanatory guidance and the actua",
        "html": "<p>Bounded official-source check closed on 9 September 2026. Two original HTML responses retained: one substantive Commission FAQ and the public portal&#x27;s application shell. No login, application, data query or live platform experiment. Root independently owns the adopted Article 40 and delegated-rule reading; this lane reports explanatory guidance and the actual public-record boundary.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-operational-route-described-by-the-commission\">The operational route described by the Commission</h2>\n<p>The [Joint Research Centre / European Centre for Algorithmic Transparency FAQ](http[local research file] published <strong>3 July 2025</strong>, shows an update of <strong>29 October 2025</strong>. It distinguishes public-data access under Article 40(12) from vetted non-public access under 40(4). Both require commercial independence, disclosed research funding, proportionate research and security/privacy safeguards; vetting adds research affiliation and public, free results. Locators: questions on access/conditions, reader lines 33–52.</p>\n<p>The <strong>DSC where the platform provider is established</strong> makes the final decision and issues a reasoned request. The researcher&#x27;s home DSC may assess and forward an application (90–96). The FAQ describes an <strong>80-working-day</strong> response, with explained extension (139–145); this is not a guaranteed data-delivery date. The establishment DSC specifies access conditions case by case, potentially using a secure environment rather than transferring data (130–138). A provider may seek amendments or mediation, but the DSC retains the decision (154–167). Public-data refusal feedback can inform Commission systemic enforcement; the FAQ says it will not opine on individual cases (80–84).</p>\n<p>These are described powers and conditions, not an exercised decision concerning GDI. The Commission&#x27;s explanatory text should be reconciled with root&#x27;s operative-law reading rather than substituted for it. One question heading says the delegated act was adopted in June 2025, while the body dates adoption to July; no June date is adopted here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-became-publicly-inspectable-in-this-session\">What became publicly inspectable in this session</h2>\n<p>The FAQ&#x27;s question on other researchers&#x27; outcomes says public overviews of reasoned requests and amendments are intended to appear in the [DSA data access portal](http[local research file] (149–150). This is narrower than a promise that every application, rejection or private exchange is public. Root&#x27;s independent reading of delegated Regulation 2025/2050 Article 11 identifies topic, provider, requested data and access modality as overview fields; researcher and funder names are not mandatory fields. An exact-name search is consequently a particularly weak exclusion test. This legal detail is cross-lane input, not an additional legal-text read by this worker.</p>\n<p>The FAQ&#x27;s actual link opened <code>/home</code>. The official reader returned zero lines. One ordinary GET returned HTTP 200 and 45,880 bytes of an application shell, with only the title in text extraction and no anchor links. <strong>No overview rows were inspected.</strong> No application index was enumerated, searched through a logged-in interface, exported or reverse-engineered. A retained shell is not evidence that the portal has no records, or that its intended public summaries require login. This transport branch was closed after the two ordinary methods.</p>\n<h2 id=\"gdi-ai4trust-request-or-approval-status\">GDI / AI4TRUST request or approval status</h2>\n<p>No publicly identifiable official approval or reasoned request for GDI or AI4TRUST was acquired. That is an evidence limit, <strong>not a finding that neither has applied, qualified or obtained data</strong>. The exact indexed-name checks were:</p>\n<p><code>site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu &quot;GDI&quot;</code>; <code>site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu &quot;AI4TRUST&quot;</code>; <code>site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu &quot;Disinformation Index&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;Global Disinformation Index&quot; &quot;vetted&quot; &quot;approved&quot;</code>; <code>site:cnam.ie &quot;AI4TRUST&quot;</code>; <code>site:cnam.ie &quot;Global Disinformation Index&quot;</code>; and <code>site:bundesnetzagentur.de &quot;GDI&quot; &quot;researcher&quot;</code>.</p>\n<p>These returned no matching official named request/approval in the displayed results. The broader query returned historical Commission policy references and commentary, neither of which is a vetting record. Earlier discovery queries and the search boundary are recorded in the manifest. Search indexing is incomplete; a request may name a principal researcher, research institution or project variant rather than either searched label. This was not a search of every DSC or a complete public register.</p>\n<p>The already accepted GDI retrospective describes a 2024 Article 40 application and refusal. It does not supply the original application, a DSC determination or a paragraph-specific legal route. Its date alone must not be recast as an application under the mechanism that the FAQ says became operational on 29 October 2025. Conversely, this run does not invalidate that historical self-report. The exact procedural channel remains a missing fact.</p>\n<p>Horizon participation and financial support do not constitute a research-access determination. Nor do any previously documented platform data collections establish which legal channel supplied them. The selected sources do not establish trusted-flagger status for GDI or AI4TRUST; no inference between that separate status and researcher access is made. Commercial independence is an application condition requiring assessment, not a finding in this packet that a particular legal entity satisfies or fails it.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-next-discriminating-record\">The next discriminating record</h2>\n<p>An <strong>issued reasoned-request overview</strong>, matched to this research through provider, topic, data and modality plus corroborating applicant or decision records, would establish a concrete authority step. The public overview need not name the applicant, so a name match alone cannot be the retrieval criterion. The associated vetting decision and specified access conditions would show what was authorized. Actual provider fulfilment or delivery confirmation would be a further step. A grant record or a statement that research used platform data cannot replace this sequence.</p>\n<p>Known expected holders are the establishment DSC, the principal researcher and the provider. The portal is the stated publication channel for reasoned-request overviews. For the reported 2024 refusal, the application and platform response remain the direct records needed to distinguish public-data access, another platform scheme and a government-vetted request. No holder was contacted, and no next branch was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-reading-scope\">Custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p><code>gates-faq.html</code> and <code>gates-faq.derived.txt</code>: full substantive FAQ reader-read, questions from DSA introduction through stakeholder input, plus publication/update fields (official-reader lines 3–184). Original HTML retained; its links and date/footer fields inspected locally. This is a 29 October 2025 updated explanation captured on 9 September 2026, not a complete current enforcement-case inventory.</p>\n<p><code>gates-portal.html</code> and <code>gates-portal.derived.txt</code>: application-shell response and title only. No substantive public request index read. <code>gates-transport.json</code> preserves actual requests, timestamps, statuses and hashes. <code>gates-captures.json</code> states each source&#x27;s limits and the exact search coverage. No original decision, reasoned request, refusal correspondence or data-delivery receipt was acquired.</p>",
        "path": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09/gates-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-faq",
          "w33-con-s-portal"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded official-source check closed on 9 September 2026. Two original HTML responses retained: one substantive Commission FAQ and the public portal's application shell. No login, application, data query or live platform experiment. Root independently owns the adopted Article 40 and delegated-rule reading; this lane reports explanatory guidance and the actual public-record boundary.\n\n## The operational route described by the Commission\n\nThe Joint Research Centre / European Centre for Algorithmic Transparency FAQ (see source references) published **3 July 2025**, shows an update of **29 October 2025**. It distinguishes public-data access under Article 40(12) from vetted non-public access under 40(4). Both require commercial independence, disclosed research funding, proportionate research and security/privacy safeguards; vetting adds research affiliation and public, free results. Locators: questions on access/conditions, reader lines 33–52.\n\nThe **DSC where the platform provider is established** makes the final decision and issues a reasoned request. The researcher's home DSC may assess and forward an application (90–96). The FAQ describes an **80-working-day** response, with explained extension (139–145); this is not a guaranteed data-delivery date. The establishment DSC specifies access conditions case by case, potentially using a secure environment rather than transferring data (130–138). A provider may seek amendments or mediation, but the DSC retains the decision (154–167). Public-data refusal feedback can inform Commission systemic enforcement; the FAQ says it will not opine on individual cases (80–84).\n\nThese are described powers and conditions, not an exercised decision concerning GDI. The Commission's explanatory text should be reconciled with root's operative-law reading rather than substituted for it. One question heading says the delegated act was adopted in June 2025, while the body dates adoption to July; no June date is adopted here.\n\n## What became publicly inspectable in this session\n\nThe FAQ's question on other researchers' outcomes says public overviews of reasoned requests and amendments are intended to appear in the DSA data access portal (see source references) (149–150). This is narrower than a promise that every application, rejection or private exchange is public. Root's independent reading of delegated Regulation 2025/2050 Article 11 identifies topic, provider, requested data and access modality as overview fields; researcher and funder names are not mandatory fields. An exact-name search is consequently a particularly weak exclusion test. This legal detail is cross-lane input, not an additional legal-text read by this worker.\n\nThe FAQ's actual link opened `/home`. The official reader returned zero lines. One ordinary GET returned HTTP 200 and 45,880 bytes of an application shell, with only the title in text extraction and no anchor links. **No overview rows were inspected.** No application index was enumerated, searched through a logged-in interface, exported or reverse-engineered. A retained shell is not evidence that the portal has no records, or that its intended public summaries require login. This transport branch was closed after the two ordinary methods.\n\n## GDI / AI4TRUST request or approval status\n\nNo publicly identifiable official approval or reasoned request for GDI or AI4TRUST was acquired. That is an evidence limit, **not a finding that neither has applied, qualified or obtained data**. The exact indexed-name checks were:\n\n`site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu \"GDI\"`; `site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu \"AI4TRUST\"`; `site:data-access.dsa.ec.europa.eu \"Disinformation Index\"`; `\"Global Disinformation Index\" \"vetted\" \"approved\"`; `site:cnam.ie \"AI4TRUST\"`; `site:cnam.ie \"Global Disinformation Index\"`; and `site:bundesnetzagentur.de \"GDI\" \"researcher\"`.\n\nThese returned no matching official named request/approval in the displayed results. The broader query returned historical Commission policy references and commentary, neither of which is a vetting record. Earlier discovery queries and the search boundary are recorded in the manifest. Search indexing is incomplete; a request may name a principal researcher, research institution or project variant rather than either searched label. This was not a search of every DSC or a complete public register.\n\nThe already accepted GDI retrospective describes a 2024 Article 40 application and refusal. It does not supply the original application, a DSC determination or a paragraph-specific legal route. Its date alone must not be recast as an application under the mechanism that the FAQ says became operational on 29 October 2025. Conversely, this run does not invalidate that historical self-report. The exact procedural channel remains a missing fact.\n\nHorizon participation and financial support do not constitute a research-access determination. Nor do any previously documented platform data collections establish which legal channel supplied them. The selected sources do not establish trusted-flagger status for GDI or AI4TRUST; no inference between that separate status and researcher access is made. Commercial independence is an application condition requiring assessment, not a finding in this packet that a particular legal entity satisfies or fails it.\n\n## The next discriminating record\n\nAn **issued reasoned-request overview**, matched to this research through provider, topic, data and modality plus corroborating applicant or decision records, would establish a concrete authority step. The public overview need not name the applicant, so a name match alone cannot be the retrieval criterion. The associated vetting decision and specified access conditions would show what was authorized. Actual provider fulfilment or delivery confirmation would be a further step. A grant record or a statement that research used platform data cannot replace this sequence.\n\nKnown expected holders are the establishment DSC, the principal researcher and the provider. The portal is the stated publication channel for reasoned-request overviews. For the reported 2024 refusal, the application and platform response remain the direct records needed to distinguish public-data access, another platform scheme and a government-vetted request. No holder was contacted, and no next branch was opened.\n\n## Custody and reading scope\n\n`gates-faq.html` and `gates-faq.derived.txt`: full substantive FAQ reader-read, questions from DSA introduction through stakeholder input, plus publication/update fields (official-reader lines 3–184). Original HTML retained; its links and date/footer fields inspected locally. This is a 29 October 2025 updated explanation captured on 9 September 2026, not a complete current enforcement-case inventory.\n\n`gates-portal.html` and `gates-portal.derived.txt`: application-shell response and title only. No substantive public request index read. `gates-transport.json` preserves actual requests, timestamps, statuses and hashes. `gates-captures.json` states each source's limits and the exact search coverage. No original decision, reasoned request, refusal correspondence or data-delivery receipt was acquired.\n",
        "file": "research/dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings",
        "title": "The grant, the access decision and the action right",
        "description": "9 September2026. Root legal-text lane closed. Two adopted EU instruments and their expressly incorporated research-organisation definition were from EUR-Lex. These are powers and conditions in enacted text, not decisions about GDI. Both regulation pages show in-force status; this is not a review of every related national measure or later enforcement case.",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Root legal-text lane closed. Two adopted EU instruments and their expressly incorporated research-organisation definition were acquired from EUR-Lex. These are powers and conditions in enacted text, not decisions about GDI. Both regulation pages show in-force status; this is not a review of every related national measure or later enforcement case.</p>\n<p>Under Regulation2022/2065 Article40(4),(8)-(11), the Digital Services Coordinator of the platform provider&#x27;s establishment grants vetted status for the specific research and issues the reasoned access request. A researcher&#x27;s home coordinator may perform an initial assessment but does not acquire the final decision. The awarding coordinator can investigate and terminate access if eligibility lapses, after allowing the researcher to respond. Grant participation does not itself confer this status.</p>\n<p>Article40(8) requires research affiliation, independence from commercial interests, disclosure of research funding, appropriate security/confidentiality, necessity/proportionality, the specified systemic-risk research purpose and free public results. The incorporated Directive2019/790 Article2(1) defines a scientific-research organisation acting without profit or reinvesting profits, or under a recognised public-interest mission, without preferential results access for an undertaking exercising decisive influence. Its recital12 explains structural control as an exclusion example. This is not an acquired assessment of GDI&#x27;s eligibility. A licensing business alone does not prove failure of these conditions, nor does government or foundation support prove independence. The stated commercial-independence condition is not a general certification of political neutrality.</p>\n<p>Delegated Regulation2025/2050 Article8 and recital12 make the application a particularly revealing expected record. The recital calls for funder identity, amount, nature/duration, awarded versus pending status and, where available, funder evaluations. The operative text requires information about research funding and a declaration of commercial independence relevant to the specific project. We have acquired the required categories, not any applicant&#x27;s declarations or assessor&#x27;s reasons.</p>\n<p>The coordinator also sets technical, legal and organisational access conditions (Article9). A secure environment can constrain which data researchers see and log processing; the law does not always require transfer of raw data. Article10 requires access-start deadline and termination date. Article15 requires providers to report actual provision/termination within three working days and supply needed documentation. It constrains extra data-management or standard-tool restrictions unless specified in the reasoned request, and additional personal-data conditions outside that request. These are case-specific rules, not a general requirement to integrate any nominated detection product. No approved GDI tool, grant-to-API entitlement or current AI4TRUST connection is shown.</p>\n<p>Article7 sets80 working days to issue a reasoned request or explain refusal, with reasoned extension. It is neither GDI&#x27;s requested maximum60-day process nor a guaranteed data-delivery deadline. Under base Article40(5)-(6), providers can seek amendment within15 days on stated access/security/confidentiality grounds and the coordinator decides within15 days. Delegated Articles12-14 specify assessment, optional mediation with judicial rights preserved, and independent experts. Experts must declare no financial/personal ties to provider or applicant, no outcome interest and no conflict; their opinions are recorded in AGORA. This does not prove any expert has been retained in a named case.</p>\n<p>The public record is narrower than the application file. Article11 requires an overview of an issued reasoned request and its changes, containing topic, provider, data description and access modalities. It does not require every applicant, rejected application, funding declaration or reviewer record to appear publicly, and does not require researcher/funder names in that overview. Exact-name failure is therefore not a reliable absence test. Authorised access and actual delivery also leave different records: an overview can show the former, Article15 notification the latter.</p>\n<p>Two other legal channels must remain distinct. Article40(12) covers publicly accessible platform data for researchers satisfying conditions8(b)-(e), without the paragraph4 project-specific vetted route. Article22 trusted-flagger status separately gives priority processing of illegal-content notices within an expertise area, with reporting, suspension and revocation rules. It does not make each notice a binding removal command. No status under either channel is inferred for GDI.</p>\n<p>The reused GDI20April2026 account says Article40 generically when describing2024 platform applications/refusals. Without original applications and replies, this case cannot assign the exact paragraph or treat them as coordinator vetting decisions. Its calls for a60-day process, standard sharing protocol and mandatory approved-tool API compatibility remain requested changes. The adopted law permits meaningful compelled research access under specified conditions; it does not establish that this organisation obtained it or that any classification controls a commercial or state decision.</p>\n<p>Sources and root read scope: dsa2022.html, original2022/2065, complete Articles40 and22 only; access2025.html, original2025/2050, complete Articles1-16 plus selected recitals11,12,14,17,21,24, title/OJ date/status, not whole preamble or Annex; research-definition2019.html, original2019/790, Article2(1) and recital12, other Article2 definitions only contextual. Complete source bytes retained does not mean complete documents read. Selected derivatives and root-transport.json preserve scope and custody. Reused horizon-gdi2026.derived.txt selected account/recommendations read in this run; its original/read history stays in the accepted Horizon packet. No new source independence. Root acquisition ends here.</p>",
        "path": "dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09/root-law-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-dsa",
          "w33-con-s-delegated",
          "w33-con-s-definition"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Root legal-text lane closed. Two adopted EU instruments and their expressly incorporated research-organisation definition were acquired from EUR-Lex. These are powers and conditions in enacted text, not decisions about GDI. Both regulation pages show in-force status; this is not a review of every related national measure or later enforcement case.\n\nUnder Regulation2022/2065 Article40(4),(8)-(11), the Digital Services Coordinator of the platform provider's establishment grants vetted status for the specific research and issues the reasoned access request. A researcher's home coordinator may perform an initial assessment but does not acquire the final decision. The awarding coordinator can investigate and terminate access if eligibility lapses, after allowing the researcher to respond. Grant participation does not itself confer this status.\n\nArticle40(8) requires research affiliation, independence from commercial interests, disclosure of research funding, appropriate security/confidentiality, necessity/proportionality, the specified systemic-risk research purpose and free public results. The incorporated Directive2019/790 Article2(1) defines a scientific-research organisation acting without profit or reinvesting profits, or under a recognised public-interest mission, without preferential results access for an undertaking exercising decisive influence. Its recital12 explains structural control as an exclusion example. This is not an acquired assessment of GDI's eligibility. A licensing business alone does not prove failure of these conditions, nor does government or foundation support prove independence. The stated commercial-independence condition is not a general certification of political neutrality.\n\nDelegated Regulation2025/2050 Article8 and recital12 make the application a particularly revealing expected record. The recital calls for funder identity, amount, nature/duration, awarded versus pending status and, where available, funder evaluations. The operative text requires information about research funding and a declaration of commercial independence relevant to the specific project. We have acquired the required categories, not any applicant's declarations or assessor's reasons.\n\nThe coordinator also sets technical, legal and organisational access conditions (Article9). A secure environment can constrain which data researchers see and log processing; the law does not always require transfer of raw data. Article10 requires access-start deadline and termination date. Article15 requires providers to report actual provision/termination within three working days and supply needed documentation. It constrains extra data-management or standard-tool restrictions unless specified in the reasoned request, and additional personal-data conditions outside that request. These are case-specific rules, not a general requirement to integrate any nominated detection product. No approved GDI tool, grant-to-API entitlement or current AI4TRUST connection is shown.\n\nArticle7 sets80 working days to issue a reasoned request or explain refusal, with reasoned extension. It is neither GDI's requested maximum60-day process nor a guaranteed data-delivery deadline. Under base Article40(5)-(6), providers can seek amendment within15 days on stated access/security/confidentiality grounds and the coordinator decides within15 days. Delegated Articles12-14 specify assessment, optional mediation with judicial rights preserved, and independent experts. Experts must declare no financial/personal ties to provider or applicant, no outcome interest and no conflict; their opinions are recorded in AGORA. This does not prove any expert has been retained in a named case.\n\nThe public record is narrower than the application file. Article11 requires an overview of an issued reasoned request and its changes, containing topic, provider, data description and access modalities. It does not require every applicant, rejected application, funding declaration or reviewer record to appear publicly, and does not require researcher/funder names in that overview. Exact-name failure is therefore not a reliable absence test. Authorised access and actual delivery also leave different records: an overview can show the former, Article15 notification the latter.\n\nTwo other legal channels must remain distinct. Article40(12) covers publicly accessible platform data for researchers satisfying conditions8(b)-(e), without the paragraph4 project-specific vetted route. Article22 trusted-flagger status separately gives priority processing of illegal-content notices within an expertise area, with reporting, suspension and revocation rules. It does not make each notice a binding removal command. No status under either channel is inferred for GDI.\n\nThe reused GDI20April2026 account says Article40 generically when describing2024 platform applications/refusals. Without original applications and replies, this case cannot assign the exact paragraph or treat them as coordinator vetting decisions. Its calls for a60-day process, standard sharing protocol and mandatory approved-tool API compatibility remain requested changes. The adopted law permits meaningful compelled research access under specified conditions; it does not establish that this organisation obtained it or that any classification controls a commercial or state decision.\n\nSources and root read scope: dsa2022.html, original2022/2065, complete Articles40 and22 only; access2025.html, original2025/2050, complete Articles1-16 plus selected recitals11,12,14,17,21,24, title/OJ date/status, not whole preamble or Annex; research-definition2019.html, original2019/790, Article2(1) and recital12, other Article2 definitions only contextual. Complete source bytes retained does not mean complete documents read. Selected derivatives and root-transport.json preserve scope and custody. Reused horizon-gdi2026.derived.txt selected account/recommendations read in this run; its original/read history stays in the accepted Horizon packet. No new source independence. Root acquisition ends here.\n",
        "file": "research/dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access",
        "title": "Digital Duty of Care: draft access and missing-text claims",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. The latest entry in forest-reviews.md was read before acquisition. This is a bounded status inquiry, not an assessment of the merits or legal effect of the proposed powers. Only this file is written by this lane.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. The latest entry in <code>forest-reviews.md</code> was read before acquisition. This is a bounded status inquiry, not an assessment of the merits or legal effect of the proposed powers. Only this file is written by this lane.</p>\n<p><strong>The 8 September exposure draft is publicly available through the department, despite the government&#x27;s description of the consultation as targeted.</strong> Its readable PDF contains six explicit unfinished-outline placeholders. The acquired record does not establish that a more complete bill was given only to selected consultees, that provisions were censored, or why any undisclosed material might have been withheld. Those claims remain unverified. This finding does not resolve whether the proposed powers could restrict speech; the operative-authority lane addresses that separate question.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-publicly-accessible-now\">What is publicly accessible now</h2>\n<p>The department&#x27;s publication page is dated 8 September 2026. It links a DOCX advertised as 184.44 KB and a PDF as 636.4 KB, and gives a public feedback address, <code>digitaldutyofcare@communications.gov.au</code>, with a deadline of <strong>12pm Tuesday 22 September</strong>. No timezone is specified there. The page presents no invitation or login requirement for reading the draft and does not limit its feedback sentence to named recipients. This proves an exposed document and feedback route, not a guarantee that every submission will receive equal consideration. The page links no bill-specific explanatory memorandum, draft rules, separate invitation terms or recipient list. Absence from that page is not proof those documents exist and are withheld. [Department publication page](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The ministerial announcement calls the consultation targeted, specifies digital platforms, industry bodies, civil-society organisations and advocates as groups whose feedback is sought, and says parliamentary introduction is intended this year. These are categories, not a named invitation roster. [8 September announcement, opening and consultation paragraph](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The official press-conference transcript independently confirms the intended public access. In response to a journalist who had not yet seen the draft, Anika Wells said: <strong>“So, the exposure draft is now out. You can peruse it online.”</strong> Wayne Holdsworth separately said he had read it twice that morning. That is one attributed account of having read the text, not proof of an exclusive advance version. Other journalists and the Prime Minister spoke of people not yet having seen it; the transcript supplies no document-distribution time or exclusive-access rule. It gives no explanation of unfinished outlines, redaction, or withheld draft clauses. [Official transcript, 8 September, Holdsworth opening remarks and Wells answer beginning “So, the exposure draft”](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-public-draft-leaves-unfinished\">What the public draft leaves unfinished</h2>\n<p>The exposed PDF has 75 physical pages, including front matter, and 71 numbered text pages. Its cover identifies an exposure draft dated 08/09/2026. The following are explicit <strong>“to be drafted”</strong> markers in the readable text; each is a simplified-outline section. The marker itself does not identify withheld substantive wording. This classification follows the headings and words actually published, not an assumption about unpublished drafting history.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Proposed provision</th>\n<th>Location, physical PDF page / printed page</th>\n<th>Published heading</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>86A</td>\n<td>7 / 3</td>\n<td>Simplified outline of Part 6A, fake nude material</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4</td>\n<td>27 / 23</td>\n<td>Simplified outline of the Act</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>25</td>\n<td>29 / 25</td>\n<td>Simplified outline of Part 2, digital duty of care</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>166</td>\n<td>47 / 43</td>\n<td>Simplified outline of Part 11, eSafety Commissioner</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>192A</td>\n<td>52 / 48</td>\n<td>Simplified outline of Part 13</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>205A</td>\n<td>63 / 59</td>\n<td>Simplified outline of Part 14, research and data access</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The acquired draft text does not label these markers redactions. No official explanation beyond their unfinished-drafting label was found in the inspected publication page or press conference. Do not rename them censorship or claim their unseen wording. [Public exposure-draft PDF](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>This is not a full visual redaction audit: neither original bytes nor a usable page image was acquired by this lane. Text search can find declared placeholders but cannot exclude every possible graphical redaction, omitted earlier version, or unpublished attachment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"earlier-public-materials-and-actual-publication-restrictions\">Earlier public materials and actual publication restrictions</h2>\n<p>The department also publishes the <strong>May 2026 issues paper</strong>, with a publication-page date of 26 May, and links a <strong>three-page summary of May–June consultation outcomes</strong>. These are policy-development materials, not an explanatory memorandum accompanying the September bill. The summary reports more than 40 consultation meetings across described stakeholder categories. It does not supply a September draft-recipient roster. [Issues paper and summary publication page](http[local research file] [consultation-outcomes summary, page 1 introduction](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A distinct, explicit non-publication rule appears on the closed <strong>14 November–7 December 2025 public survey</strong> page. Under its privacy collection notice, individual completed surveys and participants&#x27; personal information are not to be published; third-party personal-information disclosure needs legal authorization or requirement. Aggregated results may be published, with contact and identifying details redacted. The page also reserves a right not to consider responses that create legal exposure or contain abusive, offensive or defamatory material. Those are stated rules for survey responses, not secrecy terms for the 2026 draft. The old page&#x27;s closed label and registration requirement must not be applied to the September exposure-draft feedback route. [2025 survey page, Participate and Privacy Collection Notice](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A bounded official-domain search also surfaced <strong>FOI 26-276, Document 6, Attachment C</strong>, described as a summary of late-2025 consultation activities and organizational participants. Only the search-returned passage was inspected in this lane; the underlying release was not acquired here. It may identify earlier consultees but cannot establish who received September 2026 draft text. This lead was sent to the genealogy lane without assuming continuity of the roster. [FOI release, Attachment C target](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"scope-access-failures-and-stopping-point\">Scope, access failures and stopping point</h2>\n<p>The ministerial announcement and department publication pages were read in the public web reader. The press-conference transcript was read in full. The current bill was read selectively for its cover, contents, placeholders and their surrounding headings, using the web reader&#x27;s 75-page rendering. The outcomes summary was read for its introduction and accessible thematic text; it was not used to attribute a named organization&#x27;s influence. The 2025 survey&#x27;s participation and privacy terms were read in full.</p>\n<p>An ordinary Python GET to the department publication page timed out after 30 seconds before any draft bytes were obtained. The DOCX link yielded an internal error in the web reader. Screenshot attempts returned references without visible image content, with two cache misses. Those are acquisition limitations, not evidence that the government denies public access. The root&#x27;s separate ordinary PowerShell substitute also timed out; that branch is closed. No local original, original-file hash, DOCX/PDF equivalence check or complete visual examination is claimed. No account, invitation, access control or publication restriction was bypassed.</p>\n<p>The precise unresolved record family is the <strong>September consultation invitation and distribution record</strong>, together with any <strong>covering instructions, confidentiality terms, attachment/version list and later draft comparison</strong>. The department&#x27;s Digital Duty of Care policy team is the likely custodian. If an allegedly censored page or different draft is later supplied, compare it against the dated public version before attributing removal or a motive. No request or outreach was made. This lane stops at the verified public-exposure instrument; further acquisition waits for the next whole-case review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"follow-up-9-september-2026-alleged-fuller-versions-supplied-to-companies\">Follow-up, 9 September 2026: alleged fuller versions supplied to companies</h2>\n<p>The user clarified a materially different allegation: large technology companies supposedly received less skeletal versions before the public learned the intended detail. The user identifies <strong>Isaac Butterfield</strong> as the source they heard, but no exact title, URL, timestamp or quotation was supplied or identified in this bounded pass. This is an attributed user lead, not a verified quotation from Butterfield. Unrelated older appearances were not substituted for the missing clip.</p>\n<p><strong>Public availability does not resolve selective advance access. The allegation remains OPEN.</strong> Three different claims require different records: earlier circulation of the same text needs a dated covering message and identifiable attachment; circulation of a fuller version needs both versions or a reliable recipient account specifying the extra text; private explanation of an otherwise shared draft needs briefing material, notes or an attributed account. Neither public draft access nor participation in an earlier policy meeting proves or disproves those events. The unfinished outlines listed above likewise cannot establish what companies received.</p>\n<h3 id=\"separate-documented-withholding-in-the-preparation-process\">Separate documented withholding in the preparation process</h3>\n<p>A Senate primary-source search excerpt exposes a relevant historical entry in the <strong>Orders for the production of documents</strong> status table, <strong>No. 169—Digital duty of care</strong>, printed page 43. The order, moved by Senator Payman and agreed on <strong>4 September 2025</strong>, sought minister/office correspondence and briefing/meeting records with eSafety and the department concerning preparation of a legislated duty. The entry records a response on <strong>7 October 2025</strong>, identifying <strong>26</strong> responsive documents, claiming public-interest immunity for <strong>20</strong>, and supplying the remaining documents with redactions on public-interest grounds. <strong>Six is the derived remainder, 26 minus 20</strong>, not a separately printed count. The stated immunity reason concerns Cabinet deliberations and prejudice to informed government consideration of ongoing policy matters. The entry records partial compliance. [Senate OPD table, order 169](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>This is evidence of a recorded <strong>2025 preparation-document withholding claim and redacted production</strong>, distinct from the survey privacy policy above. It does not identify a complete September 2026 draft, establish its delivery to a company, or identify additional clauses seen only by industry. The underlying ministerial response and individual documents were not acquired. Reading scope is the indexed primary entry only: two targeted searches returned the same No.169 passage with its dates, counts, stated reason and printed page. A direct reader open failed; the root also reported a 403 on its direct open. No full-table review, original capture/hash or later compliance-history claim is made.</p>\n<h3 id=\"exact-source-and-recipient-record-boundary\">Exact-source and recipient-record boundary</h3>\n<p>Targeted public searches for current draft circulation, confidentiality, redactions, advance access and relevant industry accounts did not produce a paired version, September invitation/covering letter, or recipient account specifying extra clauses. That limited search result is not evidence the allegation is false. The official press-conference account of Holdsworth reading the text that morning identifies neither a company recipient nor a distinct version.</p>\n<p>Butterfield&#x27;s official website was inspected for its current video links. The linked YouTube channel returned a cache miss through the web reader. The single browser substitute then <strong>denied access because it could not verify the admin-enforced policy for youtube.com</strong>. No browser security control was bypassed, no account was used, and no indirect transcript, mirror or alternate YouTube route was pursued after that denial. The exact clip and its underlying source remain unexamined. [Official site used to identify the channel link](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The present outcome is therefore narrower than either dismissal or confirmation: a public September draft; explicit incomplete outlines; a separate indexed parliamentary record of withheld/redacted preparation documents in 2025; and an unresolved allegation of selective access to fuller 2026 text. The next discriminating evidence would be the exact clip/quotation and its cited document, or the recipient covering letter plus attachment/version comparison. No outreach or further acquisition follows. The current run returns to the whole-case assessment with the selective-version claim open.</p>",
        "path": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09/draft-access.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-publication",
          "w10-duty-s-announcement",
          "w10-duty-s-opd169"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. The latest entry in `forest-reviews.md` was read before acquisition. This is a bounded status inquiry, not an assessment of the merits or legal effect of the proposed powers. Only this file is written by this lane.\n\n**The 8 September exposure draft is publicly available through the department, despite the government's description of the consultation as targeted.** Its readable PDF contains six explicit unfinished-outline placeholders. The acquired record does not establish that a more complete bill was given only to selected consultees, that provisions were censored, or why any undisclosed material might have been withheld. Those claims remain unverified. This finding does not resolve whether the proposed powers could restrict speech; the operative-authority lane addresses that separate question.\n\n## What is publicly accessible now\n\nThe department's publication page is dated 8 September 2026. It links a DOCX advertised as 184.44 KB and a PDF as 636.4 KB, and gives a public feedback address, `digitaldutyofcare@communications.gov.au`, with a deadline of **12pm Tuesday 22 September**. No timezone is specified there. The page presents no invitation or login requirement for reading the draft and does not limit its feedback sentence to named recipients. This proves an exposed document and feedback route, not a guarantee that every submission will receive equal consideration. The page links no bill-specific explanatory memorandum, draft rules, separate invitation terms or recipient list. Absence from that page is not proof those documents exist and are withheld. Department publication page (see source references)\n\nThe ministerial announcement calls the consultation targeted, specifies digital platforms, industry bodies, civil-society organisations and advocates as groups whose feedback is sought, and says parliamentary introduction is intended this year. These are categories, not a named invitation roster. 8 September announcement, opening and consultation paragraph (see source references)\n\nThe official press-conference transcript independently confirms the intended public access. In response to a journalist who had not yet seen the draft, Anika Wells said: **“So, the exposure draft is now out. You can peruse it online.”** Wayne Holdsworth separately said he had read it twice that morning. That is one attributed account of having read the text, not proof of an exclusive advance version. Other journalists and the Prime Minister spoke of people not yet having seen it; the transcript supplies no document-distribution time or exclusive-access rule. It gives no explanation of unfinished outlines, redaction, or withheld draft clauses. Official transcript, 8 September, Holdsworth opening remarks and Wells answer beginning “So, the exposure draft” (see source references)\n\n## What the public draft leaves unfinished\n\nThe exposed PDF has 75 physical pages, including front matter, and 71 numbered text pages. Its cover identifies an exposure draft dated 08/09/2026. The following are explicit **“to be drafted”** markers in the readable text; each is a simplified-outline section. The marker itself does not identify withheld substantive wording. This classification follows the headings and words actually published, not an assumption about unpublished drafting history.\n\n| Proposed provision | Location, physical PDF page / printed page | Published heading |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 86A | 7 / 3 | Simplified outline of Part 6A, fake nude material |\n| 4 | 27 / 23 | Simplified outline of the Act |\n| 25 | 29 / 25 | Simplified outline of Part 2, digital duty of care |\n| 166 | 47 / 43 | Simplified outline of Part 11, eSafety Commissioner |\n| 192A | 52 / 48 | Simplified outline of Part 13 |\n| 205A | 63 / 59 | Simplified outline of Part 14, research and data access |\n\nThe acquired draft text does not label these markers redactions. No official explanation beyond their unfinished-drafting label was found in the inspected publication page or press conference. Do not rename them censorship or claim their unseen wording. Public exposure-draft PDF (see source references)\n\nThis is not a full visual redaction audit: neither original bytes nor a usable page image was acquired by this lane. Text search can find declared placeholders but cannot exclude every possible graphical redaction, omitted earlier version, or unpublished attachment.\n\n## Earlier public materials and actual publication restrictions\n\nThe department also publishes the **May 2026 issues paper**, with a publication-page date of 26 May, and links a **three-page summary of May–June consultation outcomes**. These are policy-development materials, not an explanatory memorandum accompanying the September bill. The summary reports more than 40 consultation meetings across described stakeholder categories. It does not supply a September draft-recipient roster. Issues paper and summary publication page (see source references) consultation-outcomes summary, page 1 introduction (see source references)\n\nA distinct, explicit non-publication rule appears on the closed **14 November–7 December 2025 public survey** page. Under its privacy collection notice, individual completed surveys and participants' personal information are not to be published; third-party personal-information disclosure needs legal authorization or requirement. Aggregated results may be published, with contact and identifying details redacted. The page also reserves a right not to consider responses that create legal exposure or contain abusive, offensive or defamatory material. Those are stated rules for survey responses, not secrecy terms for the 2026 draft. The old page's closed label and registration requirement must not be applied to the September exposure-draft feedback route. 2025 survey page, Participate and Privacy Collection Notice (see source references)\n\nA bounded official-domain search also surfaced **FOI 26-276, Document 6, Attachment C**, described as a summary of late-2025 consultation activities and organizational participants. Only the search-returned passage was inspected in this lane; the underlying release was not acquired here. It may identify earlier consultees but cannot establish who received September 2026 draft text. This lead was sent to the genealogy lane without assuming continuity of the roster. FOI release, Attachment C target (see source references)\n\n## Scope, access failures and stopping point\n\nThe ministerial announcement and department publication pages were read in the public web reader. The press-conference transcript was read in full. The current bill was read selectively for its cover, contents, placeholders and their surrounding headings, using the web reader's 75-page rendering. The outcomes summary was read for its introduction and accessible thematic text; it was not used to attribute a named organization's influence. The 2025 survey's participation and privacy terms were read in full.\n\nAn ordinary Python GET to the department publication page timed out after 30 seconds before any draft bytes were obtained. The DOCX link yielded an internal error in the web reader. Screenshot attempts returned references without visible image content, with two cache misses. Those are acquisition limitations, not evidence that the government denies public access. The root's separate ordinary PowerShell substitute also timed out; that branch is closed. No local original, original-file hash, DOCX/PDF equivalence check or complete visual examination is claimed. No account, invitation, access control or publication restriction was bypassed.\n\nThe precise unresolved record family is the **September consultation invitation and distribution record**, together with any **covering instructions, confidentiality terms, attachment/version list and later draft comparison**. The department's Digital Duty of Care policy team is the likely custodian. If an allegedly censored page or different draft is later supplied, compare it against the dated public version before attributing removal or a motive. No request or outreach was made. This lane stops at the verified public-exposure instrument; further acquisition waits for the next whole-case review.\n\n## Follow-up, 9 September 2026: alleged fuller versions supplied to companies\n\nThe user clarified a materially different allegation: large technology companies supposedly received less skeletal versions before the public learned the intended detail. The user identifies **Isaac Butterfield** as the source they heard, but no exact title, URL, timestamp or quotation was supplied or identified in this bounded pass. This is an attributed user lead, not a verified quotation from Butterfield. Unrelated older appearances were not substituted for the missing clip.\n\n**Public availability does not resolve selective advance access. The allegation remains OPEN.** Three different claims require different records: earlier circulation of the same text needs a dated covering message and identifiable attachment; circulation of a fuller version needs both versions or a reliable recipient account specifying the extra text; private explanation of an otherwise shared draft needs briefing material, notes or an attributed account. Neither public draft access nor participation in an earlier policy meeting proves or disproves those events. The unfinished outlines listed above likewise cannot establish what companies received.\n\n### Separate documented withholding in the preparation process\n\nA Senate primary-source search excerpt exposes a relevant historical entry in the **Orders for the production of documents** status table, **No. 169—Digital duty of care**, printed page 43. The order, moved by Senator Payman and agreed on **4 September 2025**, sought minister/office correspondence and briefing/meeting records with eSafety and the department concerning preparation of a legislated duty. The entry records a response on **7 October 2025**, identifying **26** responsive documents, claiming public-interest immunity for **20**, and supplying the remaining documents with redactions on public-interest grounds. **Six is the derived remainder, 26 minus 20**, not a separately printed count. The stated immunity reason concerns Cabinet deliberations and prejudice to informed government consideration of ongoing policy matters. The entry records partial compliance. Senate OPD table, order 169 (see source references)\n\nThis is evidence of a recorded **2025 preparation-document withholding claim and redacted production**, distinct from the survey privacy policy above. It does not identify a complete September 2026 draft, establish its delivery to a company, or identify additional clauses seen only by industry. The underlying ministerial response and individual documents were not acquired. Reading scope is the indexed primary entry only: two targeted searches returned the same No.169 passage with its dates, counts, stated reason and printed page. A direct reader open failed; the root also reported a 403 on its direct open. No full-table review, original capture/hash or later compliance-history claim is made.\n\n### Exact-source and recipient-record boundary\n\nTargeted public searches for current draft circulation, confidentiality, redactions, advance access and relevant industry accounts did not produce a paired version, September invitation/covering letter, or recipient account specifying extra clauses. That limited search result is not evidence the allegation is false. The official press-conference account of Holdsworth reading the text that morning identifies neither a company recipient nor a distinct version.\n\nButterfield's official website was inspected for its current video links. The linked YouTube channel returned a cache miss through the web reader. The single browser substitute then **denied access because it could not verify the admin-enforced policy for youtube.com**. No browser security control was bypassed, no account was used, and no indirect transcript, mirror or alternate YouTube route was pursued after that denial. The exact clip and its underlying source remain unexamined. Official site used to identify the channel link (see source references)\n\nThe present outcome is therefore narrower than either dismissal or confirmation: a public September draft; explicit incomplete outlines; a separate indexed parliamentary record of withheld/redacted preparation documents in 2025; and an unresolved allegation of selective access to fuller 2026 text. The next discriminating evidence would be the exact clip/quotation and its cited document, or the recipient covering letter plus attachment/version comparison. No outreach or further acquisition follows. The current run returns to the whole-case assessment with the selective-version claim open.\n",
        "file": "research/duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-draft-access.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority",
        "title": "Australia Digital Duty of Care: operative authority and adult choice",
        "description": "Instrument reviewed: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026, exposure draft dated 8 September 2026. Research date: 9 September 2026. This is proposed legislation, not an enacted duty. The preceding whole-case assessment in forest-reviews.md was read before this lane. All draft powers below are conditional on enactment and, where specified, ",
        "html": "<p>Instrument reviewed: <strong>Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026, exposure draft dated 8 September 2026</strong>. Research date: 9 September 2026. This is proposed legislation, not an enacted duty. The preceding whole-case assessment in forest-reviews.md was read before this lane. All draft powers below are conditional on enactment and, where specified, later instruments.</p>\n<p>Primary sources: [D — exposure draft, 75 PDF pages/71 numbered pages](http[local research file] [A — Online Safety Act 2021, official compilation C2024C00852, 11 December 2024](http[local research file] The Register’s [latest-version landing page](http[local research file] identifies that compilation as current. Page locators below are <strong>PDF page / printed page</strong>, not zero-based reader indices.</p>\n<h2 id=\"principal-finding\">Principal finding</h2>\n<p>The draft would create an enforceable, continuing obligation on service providers and persons exercising day-to-day control to manage online risks. It is not confined to removing already unlawful posts. Parliament would specify initial categories, the minister could expand specified categories and require user controls through legislative instruments, and eSafety could specify assessment requirements and direct remedial action after reasonably believing the duty had been breached. This is a concrete delegation over service design, with legal limits and review routes. It is not evidence that those powers have already been exercised.</p>\n<p>The adult-choice boundary is narrower than a general right to assume risk. Under proposed s26(7), the digital duty does not require action concerning lawful communications occurring privately solely between consenting adults. It does not expressly exempt all willing adult consumption of public material or an adult’s private interaction with an AI system. Whether particular AI chats meet the exception remains unresolved; an AI is not expressly treated as a consenting adult. Conversely, pornography is listed in the child-specific category, not automatically in the adult/general list. [D, ss25B–25D, PDF30–33/printed26–29; s26(7), PDF36/printed32.]</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-can-require-what\">Who can require what?</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Decision owner</th>\n<th>Proposed requirement or power</th>\n<th>Clause, trigger and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Parliament, through the enacted text</td>\n<td>A safe environment so far as reasonably practicable; appropriate design-feature management, written risk assessment and effective measures addressing assessments.</td>\n<td>D ss25H, 26–26A, PDF35–38/printed31–34. Reasonable practicability weighs likelihood, severity, knowledge, available measures, cost and privacy impact. This is a risk-management duty, not an absolute guarantee that no harm occurs.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Minister</td>\n<td>Exempt a service/class from one or more duty provisions, possibly conditionally, where risk is small or Australian use minimal.</td>\n<td>D s25A(3)–(5), PDF30/printed26. Must seek and consider eSafety advice under s27B. This supplies a potential small/low-risk-service route, not an automatic small-business exemption.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Minister</td>\n<td>Add serious-harm categories; add child-harm categories; deem further design features to have negative behavioural impacts.</td>\n<td>D ss25C(2), 25D(2), 25G(2), PDF32–34/printed28–30. Legislative instruments; s27B requires eSafety advice. Adult/general additions require ministerial satisfaction that material/conduct may cause serious harm.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Minister</td>\n<td>Treat a service as social media, or not, for the safe-environment provision; require specified services to provide specified user-empowerment tools.</td>\n<td>D ss25B(2)–(3), 26(4)–(6), PDF31/printed27 and PDF36/printed32. The special s27B advice list does not include these two powers. Tools may control recommendation/design operation; actual tools and services await instruments.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>eSafety Commissioner</td>\n<td>Set additional assessment detail, methods, standards/metrics and intervals shorter than annual.</td>\n<td>D s26A(2)(f), (3)–(4), PDF37–38/printed33–34. Legislative instrument. Assess before changes introducing new/additional risk; keep assessments six years and produce within 30 days of request.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>eSafety Commissioner</td>\n<td>Give a written direction specifying action to prevent future duty failures.</td>\n<td>D s26D, PDF38–39/printed34–35. Requires reasonable belief of present/past noncompliance; not a legislative instrument. Failure to comply carries a separate civil penalty. ART review is added by Schedule 2 item 58.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>eSafety Commissioner</td>\n<td>Select service classes requiring complaint/dispute processes and specify process requirements; direct remediation of noncompliance.</td>\n<td>D ss26F–26G, PDF39–40/printed35–36. Processes must be equally available to Australians. Detailed entitlements depend on a later instrument; this is not an express universal right to have removed content restored.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>eSafety Commissioner</td>\n<td>Require transparency reports; require classes of providers to publish operational safety information.</td>\n<td>D ss192C–192N, PDF53–58/printed49–54. Reporting notice must satisfy statutory purposes and consider burden; it must state reasons and review rights. Publication requirements may cover moderation, account removal, complaints and risk assessment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>eSafety Commissioner</td>\n<td>Compel information/documents, relevant answers and attendance for examination concerning listed investigations or compliance/possible contraventions.</td>\n<td>D ss198–205, PDF59–63/printed55–59. Reason to believe the person can provide relevant material; the new general compliance limb excludes Part 4A social-media minimum-age provisions. Existing investigation powers are expanded/recast, not created from nothing.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Minister through legislative rules; prospective eSafety approval decisions if the rules so provide</td>\n<td>Establish researcher-approval and data-access schemes, including data classes, requests, fees, conditions and revocations.</td>\n<td>D ss205B–205F, PDF63–66/printed59–62; A s240 identifies the minister as legislative-rule maker. Compelled access would depend on those rules. University employment, approval under legislative rules, ethics approval and a prescribed public-interest research kind constrain eligibility.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Approved researchers and eSafety</td>\n<td>Use fictitious accounts for authorized research/regulatory purposes despite contrary laws or contractual terms.</td>\n<td>D ss205G–205L, PDF66–68/printed62–64. Listed uses include observing, recording and testing. Engaging other users is limited to what is necessary to prevent account closure. The Commissioner’s additional material-generation power expressly excludes criminal production/dissemination/possession. Good-faith civil immunity is provided.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>eSafety Commissioner; courts and tribunal in their distinct roles</td>\n<td>Issue warnings/infringement notices; seek statutory enforcement; make specified decisions reviewable.</td>\n<td>D ss26B–26D, 163A, 220 amendments, PDF38–39/printed34–35, PDF45–46/printed41–42, PDF68/printed64; A ss162–165. Do not present the court-level maximum as an amount the Commissioner can conclusively impose without court process.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"coverage-and-harm-thresholds\">Coverage and harm thresholds</h2>\n<p>Proposed s25A covers internet carriage, social media, relevant electronic services, designated internet services, hosting, search, app distribution, specified equipment-related services, and services permitting AI generation <strong>and</strong> sharing through the listed service types (PDF29–30/printed25–26). Existing A s13A expressly includes email, instant messaging, SMS/MMS, chat and multiplayer online games. A s14 supplies a broad internet-content-service category subject to exclusions. Accordingly, messaging and games are within the proposed duty through existing definitions; the private-adult exception affects action required, rather than excluding all messaging services. The AI limb is functionally described, not a blanket designation of every offline model or every AI developer. Other categories might independently cover an online AI product.</p>\n<p>The general protection in s25B(1)(a) uses s25C’s list: child sexual exploitation/abuse and grooming; encouragement/instruction of sexual or extreme violence; explicit violent threats; intentional serious-harm harassment; encouragement of suicide, self-harm, sadistic exploitation or animal cruelty; specified terrorism support; encouragement/instruction of crime and illicit drug use; abhorrent violent conduct; and ministerially added categories. There is no single overarching requirement that every item must first be independently criminal. Nor is the entire list subject to the existing adult-targeted cyber-abuse test in A s7. These are distinct schemes. [D PDF31–32/printed27–28; A ss5, 7.]</p>\n<p>The retained A s5 definition makes serious harm physical or mental-health harm of sufficient seriousness, including serious psychological harm/distress, and excludes mere ordinary emotional responses. This matters to the minister’s expansion threshold and references to serious harm. It does not require re-proving each expressly listed s25C category under A s7’s separate targeted-abuse test.</p>\n<p>Child-specific s25D additionally names pornography, disordered-eating promotion/instruction, promotion of hostility toward women or gender equality, crime glorification/dangerous stunts/harmful practices, and abuse/harassment/bullying. It includes a residual category capable of seriously harming a child and ministerially determined additions, the latter using a child-harm satisfaction threshold. The minister’s power is not the sole source of that residual coverage. [D PDF32–33/printed28–29.]</p>\n<p>For social media, s25B(1)(c) additionally requires the specified negative-impact features not to operate for children under 16. Sections 25F–25G define and deem recommendation, login-dependent, endless-feed, feedback and time-limited features to have those impacts. This is stronger than an optional parental toggle. It is subject to the overarching reasonably-practicable duty and ministerial service determinations. The draft does <strong>not</strong> itself prescribe a particular adult algorithm opt-in/opt-out interface: later user-tool instruments would supply that detail. [D PDF31–36/printed27–32.]</p>\n<h2 id=\"privacy-identity-expression-and-researcher-boundaries\">Privacy, identity, expression and researcher boundaries</h2>\n<p>Privacy appears expressly in s25H’s proportionality assessment. Section 26(7)’s private-consenting-adult exception is an additional substantive boundary. Neither supplies an explicit general encryption exemption or a technical rule forbidding every possible demand affecting encryption. The inspected operative draft does not prescribe universal government-ID collection, a named age-verification vendor or a general obligation to identify all users. Distinguish absence of such a clause from proof that future implementation has no identity or encryption implications.</p>\n<p>Existing A ss194–195 already permit notices for held end-user identity/contact information on reasonable grounds of relevance to the Act, with compliance limited by capability. They are not newly invented by this draft, and are not a universal account-ID collection requirement. Their reference to the Act’s operation would sit alongside an expanded Act if enacted. Schedule 2 item 63 also adds eSafety to the Privacy Act definition of enforcement body; the detailed interaction with Australian Privacy Principles was not audited here.</p>\n<p>Existing A s233 preserves the constitutional implied freedom of political communication. This is not a general statutory right to access all lawful adult material. The draft supplies no comparable comprehensive adult-consent override. Privacy is a weighed factor; a preference to accept risk does not, by itself, switch off the service’s whole duty. That leaves a substantive adult-autonomy question without justifying the claim that every lawful adult choice is prohibited.</p>\n<p>For transparency reports published by eSafety, s192G expressly excludes protected confidential and personal information (PDF55/printed51). For provider publication, s192M(6) instead points to kinds of information specified in the determination for exclusion (PDF58/printed54). Do not treat the two protections as identical.</p>\n<p>Research access has real institutional selection. Section 205B requires employment by an Australian university, approval under legislative rules, ethics approval through the university and a prescribed public-interest kind of research. It does not grant automatic access to every NGO, advocate or company. Section 205C permits later rules about conflicts, privacy/security/confidentiality, commercial use restrictions, cost-limited provider fees, and review/reconsideration of decisions to grant access requests. Those subjects are delegated; the complete safeguards and review entitlements are not already written into this draft. No named organization is appointed or given a present data-access entitlement. [D PDF64–65/printed60–61.]</p>\n<p>Cross-lane comparison: Reset.Tech Australia&#x27;s 2024 submission 70 requested vetted researcher access including third-sector organizations (printed p26/PDF28). The draft instead expressly requires employment by an Australian university, plus the prospective approval and research conditions above. That is a narrower independent eligibility route than the advocate requested; it does not award Reset a data right. It does not rule out university collaboration or indirect institutional benefit. This proposal-side passage was inspected by the parent researcher and reconciled in the independent review, rather than independently reacquired in this lane. Sources: [Reset submission 70](http[local research file] [policy-lineage.md]([local research file] draft s205B, PDF64/printed60.</p>\n<h2 id=\"supervision-remedies-and-changes-from-existing-law\">Supervision, remedies and changes from existing law</h2>\n<p>The draft adds ART review for duty, complaint-process and data-access remedial directions through s220(12), and for transparency notices through new s220(23). Existing A s220A requires an internal-review scheme for decisions of the kinds in s220. The draft does not spell out a new automatic stay or a general merits appeal against all rulemaking, warnings or researcher approvals. Do not infer no judicial remedy; the detailed judicial-review/stay framework and future research-review rules were not examined. [D PDF68/printed64; A ss220–220A.]</p>\n<p>Ministerial appointment and conflict/termination rules remain in A ss167–176. A s188 permits binding ministerial directions <strong>of a general nature only</strong>; its note expressly identifies disallowance and sunsetting exemptions. That is different from a ministerial power to reverse a particular notice. The draft’s new duty instruments are legislative instruments, while individual remedial directions and the annual enforcement-priority statement are expressly non-legislative. No new exemption from parliamentary disallowance is written alongside the duty instruments read here; an instrument-specific application of the general Legislation Act exemptions was not completed. Do not claim every instrument is immune from scrutiny, or that every one receives an affirmative parliamentary vote.</p>\n<p>Under new s166C, eSafety must publish annual monitoring/enforcement priorities, but the statement expressly does not restrict its functions or powers. Existing annual reporting continues; the draft adds counts of new directions. Existing good-faith protection from damages in A s222 is distinct from access to review. The draft also resets the s239A independent-review timing by reference to duty commencement; the surviving provision requires a written report tabled in Parliament. [D PDF49–51/printed45–47 and PDF70/printed66; A ss183, 222, 239A.]</p>\n<p>A consequential change is information compulsion. Existing A ss198–205 tie powers to specified investigations and allow a reasonable excuse and refusal on self-incrimination grounds. The replacement expands scope to compliance/possible contravention, removes that general reasonable-excuse wording, and compels self-incriminating material while providing individual use and derivative-use protection, subject to stated exceptions. It preserves a journalist-source exception. A private examination, adviser and record remain, although the draft makes obtaining the record request-based and timing subject to the Commissioner/delegate’s view. The existing 12-month criminal maximum for noncompliance is retained/recast; the civil penalty stated becomes 1,000 units. [D PDF59–63/printed55–59; A ss198–205.]</p>\n<p>The draft states 60,000 penalty units for duty breach and disobeying duty-remediation directions; 6,000 for complaint-process, transparency and data-access failures; and 1,000 for failing a required Australian contact nomination. New s163A specifies 12 units for an individual or 600 for a corporation per alleged contravention in the listed infringement-notice scheme. These are distinct mechanisms; corporate multipliers, continuing contraventions and dollar conversion were not calculated here. Existing A s162 makes eSafety an applicant and names the Federal Court and Federal Circuit and Family Court (Division 2) as relevant civil-penalty courts.</p>\n<p>Not every clause is a new power. Proposed s177A substantially relocates existing A s28’s general necessary/convenient power. Grant and educational/research functions substantially continue existing A s27, with transitional continuity in Schedule 2 item 65. By contrast, the general duty, expanded compliance-information limb and research-access scheme are material new instruments. Schedule 2 repeals the Basic Online Safety Expectations Part 4; Schedule 3 repeals the online-content industry-code/standard division. This is a replacement architecture, not simply an additional overlay while all earlier instruments necessarily persist. [D PDF41/printed37, PDF50/printed46, PDF72–74/printed68–70; A ss27–28.]</p>\n<h2 id=\"separate-immediate-notice-changes\">Separate immediate notice changes</h2>\n<p>Schedule 1 would commence the day after assent; the duty and industry-code repeal schedules would commence after 12 months (D PDF6/printed2). Proposed s86B permits eSafety, on reasonable grounds of predominant design or use for fake-nude generation, to order app-store/search removal of an app, links, advertising, information or access. Section 86C gives 24 hours unless extended, capability-limited compliance and 6,000 units; s220(10B) adds ART review. This is a specific proposed distribution gate, separate from the general duty. The definition scope of fake nude material was not resolved in this lane: no definition appeared in the inserted lists read, but existing and incorporated definitions were not comprehensively traced. This is not an explicitly marked missing definition or evidence of redaction; the definition question remains unresolved in this scoped reading. [D PDF7–9/printed3–5.]</p>\n<p>Other Schedule 1 amendments reduce the initial platform-complaint waiting period from 48 to 24 hours, permit waivers for inaccessible complaints systems or foreseeable further harm, and address reposts after a prior removal notice. They do not erase the distinct substantive targeted-adult-abuse test. New search-link deletion notices generally require a prior removal notice, an appropriateness judgment and revocation when no longer required or outstanding removals are complied with. These are extensions of existing removal machinery, not a newly invented power to remove any disliked speech. [D PDF9–22/printed5–18; A ss7, 88–90.]</p>\n<h2 id=\"evidence-scope-and-stopping-point\">Evidence scope and stopping point</h2>\n<p>The shared web-reader rendition of the original publisher’s PDF was used. Read: front matter/commencement; Schedule 2 operative definitions, duty, enforcement, transparency, information, research, review and transition provisions; Schedule 3 repeal provisions; targeted Schedule 1 fake-nude, adult-removal, link-deletion, review and disclosure amendments. Detailed adjacent Schedule 1 paragraphs were not all separately examined. For the existing Act, read the cited definitions, powers, enforcement, ministerial oversight, information, review, expression and rulemaking provisions, not the entire Act.</p>\n<p>No original PDF bytes were retained by this lane. Initial direct URL web-open returned a non-retryable safe-open error; one ordinary PDF GET timed out after 30 seconds with no body. Reusing the access agent’s already working source reference supplied the necessary text. These were transport errors, not an automatic sandbox-approval rejection; no blocked browser route was retried. Parliament explanatory-page opens and one current Legislation Act route also failed, so this packet limits its disallowance claim as stated above. Neither this lane nor the access lane acquired original draft bytes or a file hash. The access lane retains scoped public-reader evidence and a stated visual gap; this file is not a preserved original.</p>\n<p>The instrument breakpoint is reached. The strongest defensible interpretation is expanded preventative service-design regulation with ministerial category-setting, eSafety implementation/enforcement and selected review mechanisms. A rival interpretation focused on ordinary prevention of serious harms remains compatible with the text; motive is not resolved. The decisive autonomy gap is how the minister/regulator would distinguish protected adult choice from preventable harm in concrete instruments and decisions, especially AI interactions. The private-adult exception belongs to the digital duty; it does not purport to disable every separate notice or information power in the Act. Missing discriminating records are settled definitions, actual user-tool/risk-assessment/data-access rules, safeguards and review procedures, and later decisions applying them. No new branch is opened here; return to the whole-case assessment.</p>",
        "path": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09/operative-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-draft",
          "w10-duty-s-existing-act"
        ],
        "markdown": "Instrument reviewed: **Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026, exposure draft dated 8 September 2026**. Research date: 9 September 2026. This is proposed legislation, not an enacted duty. The preceding whole-case assessment in forest-reviews.md was read before this lane. All draft powers below are conditional on enactment and, where specified, later instruments.\n\nPrimary sources: D — exposure draft, 75 PDF pages/71 numbered pages (see source references) A — Online Safety Act 2021, official compilation C2024C00852, 11 December 2024 (see source references) The Register’s latest-version landing page (see source references) identifies that compilation as current. Page locators below are **PDF page / printed page**, not zero-based reader indices.\n\n## Principal finding\n\nThe draft would create an enforceable, continuing obligation on service providers and persons exercising day-to-day control to manage online risks. It is not confined to removing already unlawful posts. Parliament would specify initial categories, the minister could expand specified categories and require user controls through legislative instruments, and eSafety could specify assessment requirements and direct remedial action after reasonably believing the duty had been breached. This is a concrete delegation over service design, with legal limits and review routes. It is not evidence that those powers have already been exercised.\n\nThe adult-choice boundary is narrower than a general right to assume risk. Under proposed s26(7), the digital duty does not require action concerning lawful communications occurring privately solely between consenting adults. It does not expressly exempt all willing adult consumption of public material or an adult’s private interaction with an AI system. Whether particular AI chats meet the exception remains unresolved; an AI is not expressly treated as a consenting adult. Conversely, pornography is listed in the child-specific category, not automatically in the adult/general list. [D, ss25B–25D, PDF30–33/printed26–29; s26(7), PDF36/printed32.]\n\n## Who can require what?\n\n| Decision owner | Proposed requirement or power | Clause, trigger and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Parliament, through the enacted text | A safe environment so far as reasonably practicable; appropriate design-feature management, written risk assessment and effective measures addressing assessments. | D ss25H, 26–26A, PDF35–38/printed31–34. Reasonable practicability weighs likelihood, severity, knowledge, available measures, cost and privacy impact. This is a risk-management duty, not an absolute guarantee that no harm occurs. |\n| Minister | Exempt a service/class from one or more duty provisions, possibly conditionally, where risk is small or Australian use minimal. | D s25A(3)–(5), PDF30/printed26. Must seek and consider eSafety advice under s27B. This supplies a potential small/low-risk-service route, not an automatic small-business exemption. |\n| Minister | Add serious-harm categories; add child-harm categories; deem further design features to have negative behavioural impacts. | D ss25C(2), 25D(2), 25G(2), PDF32–34/printed28–30. Legislative instruments; s27B requires eSafety advice. Adult/general additions require ministerial satisfaction that material/conduct may cause serious harm. |\n| Minister | Treat a service as social media, or not, for the safe-environment provision; require specified services to provide specified user-empowerment tools. | D ss25B(2)–(3), 26(4)–(6), PDF31/printed27 and PDF36/printed32. The special s27B advice list does not include these two powers. Tools may control recommendation/design operation; actual tools and services await instruments. |\n| eSafety Commissioner | Set additional assessment detail, methods, standards/metrics and intervals shorter than annual. | D s26A(2)(f), (3)–(4), PDF37–38/printed33–34. Legislative instrument. Assess before changes introducing new/additional risk; keep assessments six years and produce within 30 days of request. |\n| eSafety Commissioner | Give a written direction specifying action to prevent future duty failures. | D s26D, PDF38–39/printed34–35. Requires reasonable belief of present/past noncompliance; not a legislative instrument. Failure to comply carries a separate civil penalty. ART review is added by Schedule 2 item 58. |\n| eSafety Commissioner | Select service classes requiring complaint/dispute processes and specify process requirements; direct remediation of noncompliance. | D ss26F–26G, PDF39–40/printed35–36. Processes must be equally available to Australians. Detailed entitlements depend on a later instrument; this is not an express universal right to have removed content restored. |\n| eSafety Commissioner | Require transparency reports; require classes of providers to publish operational safety information. | D ss192C–192N, PDF53–58/printed49–54. Reporting notice must satisfy statutory purposes and consider burden; it must state reasons and review rights. Publication requirements may cover moderation, account removal, complaints and risk assessment. |\n| eSafety Commissioner | Compel information/documents, relevant answers and attendance for examination concerning listed investigations or compliance/possible contraventions. | D ss198–205, PDF59–63/printed55–59. Reason to believe the person can provide relevant material; the new general compliance limb excludes Part 4A social-media minimum-age provisions. Existing investigation powers are expanded/recast, not created from nothing. |\n| Minister through legislative rules; prospective eSafety approval decisions if the rules so provide | Establish researcher-approval and data-access schemes, including data classes, requests, fees, conditions and revocations. | D ss205B–205F, PDF63–66/printed59–62; A s240 identifies the minister as legislative-rule maker. Compelled access would depend on those rules. University employment, approval under legislative rules, ethics approval and a prescribed public-interest research kind constrain eligibility. |\n| Approved researchers and eSafety | Use fictitious accounts for authorized research/regulatory purposes despite contrary laws or contractual terms. | D ss205G–205L, PDF66–68/printed62–64. Listed uses include observing, recording and testing. Engaging other users is limited to what is necessary to prevent account closure. The Commissioner’s additional material-generation power expressly excludes criminal production/dissemination/possession. Good-faith civil immunity is provided. |\n| eSafety Commissioner; courts and tribunal in their distinct roles | Issue warnings/infringement notices; seek statutory enforcement; make specified decisions reviewable. | D ss26B–26D, 163A, 220 amendments, PDF38–39/printed34–35, PDF45–46/printed41–42, PDF68/printed64; A ss162–165. Do not present the court-level maximum as an amount the Commissioner can conclusively impose without court process. |\n\n## Coverage and harm thresholds\n\nProposed s25A covers internet carriage, social media, relevant electronic services, designated internet services, hosting, search, app distribution, specified equipment-related services, and services permitting AI generation **and** sharing through the listed service types (PDF29–30/printed25–26). Existing A s13A expressly includes email, instant messaging, SMS/MMS, chat and multiplayer online games. A s14 supplies a broad internet-content-service category subject to exclusions. Accordingly, messaging and games are within the proposed duty through existing definitions; the private-adult exception affects action required, rather than excluding all messaging services. The AI limb is functionally described, not a blanket designation of every offline model or every AI developer. Other categories might independently cover an online AI product.\n\nThe general protection in s25B(1)(a) uses s25C’s list: child sexual exploitation/abuse and grooming; encouragement/instruction of sexual or extreme violence; explicit violent threats; intentional serious-harm harassment; encouragement of suicide, self-harm, sadistic exploitation or animal cruelty; specified terrorism support; encouragement/instruction of crime and illicit drug use; abhorrent violent conduct; and ministerially added categories. There is no single overarching requirement that every item must first be independently criminal. Nor is the entire list subject to the existing adult-targeted cyber-abuse test in A s7. These are distinct schemes. [D PDF31–32/printed27–28; A ss5, 7.]\n\nThe retained A s5 definition makes serious harm physical or mental-health harm of sufficient seriousness, including serious psychological harm/distress, and excludes mere ordinary emotional responses. This matters to the minister’s expansion threshold and references to serious harm. It does not require re-proving each expressly listed s25C category under A s7’s separate targeted-abuse test.\n\nChild-specific s25D additionally names pornography, disordered-eating promotion/instruction, promotion of hostility toward women or gender equality, crime glorification/dangerous stunts/harmful practices, and abuse/harassment/bullying. It includes a residual category capable of seriously harming a child and ministerially determined additions, the latter using a child-harm satisfaction threshold. The minister’s power is not the sole source of that residual coverage. [D PDF32–33/printed28–29.]\n\nFor social media, s25B(1)(c) additionally requires the specified negative-impact features not to operate for children under 16. Sections 25F–25G define and deem recommendation, login-dependent, endless-feed, feedback and time-limited features to have those impacts. This is stronger than an optional parental toggle. It is subject to the overarching reasonably-practicable duty and ministerial service determinations. The draft does **not** itself prescribe a particular adult algorithm opt-in/opt-out interface: later user-tool instruments would supply that detail. [D PDF31–36/printed27–32.]\n\n## Privacy, identity, expression and researcher boundaries\n\nPrivacy appears expressly in s25H’s proportionality assessment. Section 26(7)’s private-consenting-adult exception is an additional substantive boundary. Neither supplies an explicit general encryption exemption or a technical rule forbidding every possible demand affecting encryption. The inspected operative draft does not prescribe universal government-ID collection, a named age-verification vendor or a general obligation to identify all users. Distinguish absence of such a clause from proof that future implementation has no identity or encryption implications.\n\nExisting A ss194–195 already permit notices for held end-user identity/contact information on reasonable grounds of relevance to the Act, with compliance limited by capability. They are not newly invented by this draft, and are not a universal account-ID collection requirement. Their reference to the Act’s operation would sit alongside an expanded Act if enacted. Schedule 2 item 63 also adds eSafety to the Privacy Act definition of enforcement body; the detailed interaction with Australian Privacy Principles was not audited here.\n\nExisting A s233 preserves the constitutional implied freedom of political communication. This is not a general statutory right to access all lawful adult material. The draft supplies no comparable comprehensive adult-consent override. Privacy is a weighed factor; a preference to accept risk does not, by itself, switch off the service’s whole duty. That leaves a substantive adult-autonomy question without justifying the claim that every lawful adult choice is prohibited.\n\nFor transparency reports published by eSafety, s192G expressly excludes protected confidential and personal information (PDF55/printed51). For provider publication, s192M(6) instead points to kinds of information specified in the determination for exclusion (PDF58/printed54). Do not treat the two protections as identical.\n\nResearch access has real institutional selection. Section 205B requires employment by an Australian university, approval under legislative rules, ethics approval through the university and a prescribed public-interest kind of research. It does not grant automatic access to every NGO, advocate or company. Section 205C permits later rules about conflicts, privacy/security/confidentiality, commercial use restrictions, cost-limited provider fees, and review/reconsideration of decisions to grant access requests. Those subjects are delegated; the complete safeguards and review entitlements are not already written into this draft. No named organization is appointed or given a present data-access entitlement. [D PDF64–65/printed60–61.]\n\nCross-lane comparison: Reset.Tech Australia's 2024 submission 70 requested vetted researcher access including third-sector organizations (printed p26/PDF28). The draft instead expressly requires employment by an Australian university, plus the prospective approval and research conditions above. That is a narrower independent eligibility route than the advocate requested; it does not award Reset a data right. It does not rule out university collaboration or indirect institutional benefit. This proposal-side passage was inspected by the parent researcher and reconciled in the independent review, rather than independently reacquired in this lane. Sources: Reset submission 70 (see source references) [policy-lineage.md]([local research file] draft s205B, PDF64/printed60.\n\n## Supervision, remedies and changes from existing law\n\nThe draft adds ART review for duty, complaint-process and data-access remedial directions through s220(12), and for transparency notices through new s220(23). Existing A s220A requires an internal-review scheme for decisions of the kinds in s220. The draft does not spell out a new automatic stay or a general merits appeal against all rulemaking, warnings or researcher approvals. Do not infer no judicial remedy; the detailed judicial-review/stay framework and future research-review rules were not examined. [D PDF68/printed64; A ss220–220A.]\n\nMinisterial appointment and conflict/termination rules remain in A ss167–176. A s188 permits binding ministerial directions **of a general nature only**; its note expressly identifies disallowance and sunsetting exemptions. That is different from a ministerial power to reverse a particular notice. The draft’s new duty instruments are legislative instruments, while individual remedial directions and the annual enforcement-priority statement are expressly non-legislative. No new exemption from parliamentary disallowance is written alongside the duty instruments read here; an instrument-specific application of the general Legislation Act exemptions was not completed. Do not claim every instrument is immune from scrutiny, or that every one receives an affirmative parliamentary vote.\n\nUnder new s166C, eSafety must publish annual monitoring/enforcement priorities, but the statement expressly does not restrict its functions or powers. Existing annual reporting continues; the draft adds counts of new directions. Existing good-faith protection from damages in A s222 is distinct from access to review. The draft also resets the s239A independent-review timing by reference to duty commencement; the surviving provision requires a written report tabled in Parliament. [D PDF49–51/printed45–47 and PDF70/printed66; A ss183, 222, 239A.]\n\nA consequential change is information compulsion. Existing A ss198–205 tie powers to specified investigations and allow a reasonable excuse and refusal on self-incrimination grounds. The replacement expands scope to compliance/possible contravention, removes that general reasonable-excuse wording, and compels self-incriminating material while providing individual use and derivative-use protection, subject to stated exceptions. It preserves a journalist-source exception. A private examination, adviser and record remain, although the draft makes obtaining the record request-based and timing subject to the Commissioner/delegate’s view. The existing 12-month criminal maximum for noncompliance is retained/recast; the civil penalty stated becomes 1,000 units. [D PDF59–63/printed55–59; A ss198–205.]\n\nThe draft states 60,000 penalty units for duty breach and disobeying duty-remediation directions; 6,000 for complaint-process, transparency and data-access failures; and 1,000 for failing a required Australian contact nomination. New s163A specifies 12 units for an individual or 600 for a corporation per alleged contravention in the listed infringement-notice scheme. These are distinct mechanisms; corporate multipliers, continuing contraventions and dollar conversion were not calculated here. Existing A s162 makes eSafety an applicant and names the Federal Court and Federal Circuit and Family Court (Division 2) as relevant civil-penalty courts.\n\nNot every clause is a new power. Proposed s177A substantially relocates existing A s28’s general necessary/convenient power. Grant and educational/research functions substantially continue existing A s27, with transitional continuity in Schedule 2 item 65. By contrast, the general duty, expanded compliance-information limb and research-access scheme are material new instruments. Schedule 2 repeals the Basic Online Safety Expectations Part 4; Schedule 3 repeals the online-content industry-code/standard division. This is a replacement architecture, not simply an additional overlay while all earlier instruments necessarily persist. [D PDF41/printed37, PDF50/printed46, PDF72–74/printed68–70; A ss27–28.]\n\n## Separate immediate notice changes\n\nSchedule 1 would commence the day after assent; the duty and industry-code repeal schedules would commence after 12 months (D PDF6/printed2). Proposed s86B permits eSafety, on reasonable grounds of predominant design or use for fake-nude generation, to order app-store/search removal of an app, links, advertising, information or access. Section 86C gives 24 hours unless extended, capability-limited compliance and 6,000 units; s220(10B) adds ART review. This is a specific proposed distribution gate, separate from the general duty. The definition scope of fake nude material was not resolved in this lane: no definition appeared in the inserted lists read, but existing and incorporated definitions were not comprehensively traced. This is not an explicitly marked missing definition or evidence of redaction; the definition question remains unresolved in this scoped reading. [D PDF7–9/printed3–5.]\n\nOther Schedule 1 amendments reduce the initial platform-complaint waiting period from 48 to 24 hours, permit waivers for inaccessible complaints systems or foreseeable further harm, and address reposts after a prior removal notice. They do not erase the distinct substantive targeted-adult-abuse test. New search-link deletion notices generally require a prior removal notice, an appropriateness judgment and revocation when no longer required or outstanding removals are complied with. These are extensions of existing removal machinery, not a newly invented power to remove any disliked speech. [D PDF9–22/printed5–18; A ss7, 88–90.]\n\n## Evidence scope and stopping point\n\nThe shared web-reader rendition of the original publisher’s PDF was used. Read: front matter/commencement; Schedule 2 operative definitions, duty, enforcement, transparency, information, research, review and transition provisions; Schedule 3 repeal provisions; targeted Schedule 1 fake-nude, adult-removal, link-deletion, review and disclosure amendments. Detailed adjacent Schedule 1 paragraphs were not all separately examined. For the existing Act, read the cited definitions, powers, enforcement, ministerial oversight, information, review, expression and rulemaking provisions, not the entire Act.\n\nNo original PDF bytes were retained by this lane. Initial direct URL web-open returned a non-retryable safe-open error; one ordinary PDF GET timed out after 30 seconds with no body. Reusing the access agent’s already working source reference supplied the necessary text. These were transport errors, not an automatic sandbox-approval rejection; no blocked browser route was retried. Parliament explanatory-page opens and one current Legislation Act route also failed, so this packet limits its disallowance claim as stated above. Neither this lane nor the access lane acquired original draft bytes or a file hash. The access lane retains scoped public-reader evidence and a stated visual gap; this file is not a preserved original.\n\nThe instrument breakpoint is reached. The strongest defensible interpretation is expanded preventative service-design regulation with ministerial category-setting, eSafety implementation/enforcement and selected review mechanisms. A rival interpretation focused on ordinary prevention of serious harms remains compatible with the text; motive is not resolved. The decisive autonomy gap is how the minister/regulator would distinguish protected adult choice from preventable harm in concrete instruments and decisions, especially AI interactions. The private-adult exception belongs to the digital duty; it does not purport to disable every separate notice or information power in the Act. Missing discriminating records are settled definitions, actual user-tool/risk-assessment/data-access rules, safeguards and review procedures, and later decisions applying them. No new branch is opened here; return to the whole-case assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage",
        "title": "Australian duty of care: attributable model transmission",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded lineage run after the recorded assurance forest review. Draft legal operation and access are separate companion notes.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded lineage run after the recorded assurance forest review. Draft legal operation and access are separate companion notes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-direct-intellectual-and-advocacy-connection\">A direct intellectual and advocacy connection</h2>\n<p>Australia&#x27;s official statutory review, section 5.5, printed p53, attributes the overarching duty-of-care conception to Lorna Woods and William Perrin. It cites Carnegie UK&#x27;s 2019 model bill and its 2021 criticism of the narrower UK scheme, then favors a singular Australian duty. It directly quotes Reset.Tech Australia&#x27;s submission70 when explaining why content-specific duties would be insufficient. This is recipient-side acknowledgment of models and submitted reasoning, stronger than a shared vocabulary or conference roster. It does not allocate final clause authorship to those advocates. Source: http[local research file] . Reading scope: primary indexed section5.5 text and footnotes34-38; full PDF reader exceeded13MB limit and both ordinary downloads timed out, so no full-report reading or original custody claimed.</p>\n<p>Carnegie UK&#x27;s January2022 submission to Australia&#x27;s House Select Committee says its clerk invited the submission. It proposes platform risk assessment, mitigation and ongoing supervision, with a stronger regulator and cross-border cooperation. Its envisaged interventions include changes to visibility, forwarding and message prompts, while acknowledging expression and proportionality. That is documented historical submission and intended mechanism, not proof each intervention was enacted. Source: http[local research file] . All six pages read in web rendering, especially paragraphs1,9,19-23. The document itself dates January2022 despite misleading search metadata.</p>\n<p>The Online Safety Act Network&#x27;s June2024 submission68 names Maeve Walsh as lead and Lorna Woods as principal adviser. It explicitly promotes Australian alignment with UK/EU regulation to strengthen regulators against multinational firms. Its approach covers design, operation, resourcing and business models, while warning that systems measures and content interventions cannot be completely separated. It also warns against unnecessary overmoderation and stresses privacy-by-design. Source: http[local research file] . Entire ten-page substantive rendering read. This is an advocate&#x27;s proposal; the government host is not government endorsement of every statement.</p>\n<p>A further direct working relationship is a jointly authored 22April2024 article by Rys Farthing and Woods advocating a singular Australian duty and discussing the UK divergence. The author disclosure says Reset Australia received organizational support from Reset Global, Luminate and Internet Society Foundation at that time. It does not identify a grant commissioning this article or funding Woods personally. Its claim about technology companies preferring the narrower scheme is author interpretation, not a recovered company instruction. Source: http[local research file] . Full substantive body/bylines/disclosure read. Hosted outlet identity may have changed; preserve date and original authors rather than treating this as a new2026 article.</p>\n<p>Reset&#x27;s submission70 explicitly names Woods/Perrin&#x27;s model and covers access/content creation, discovery, user tools and platform tools. Its singular-duty argument appears on printed pp4-5; later printed p26 proposes vetted researcher access including third-sector organizations. That is a potential institutional-benefit design, not an awarded right to Reset or proof of control over platform data. Source: http[local research file] . Scoped passages PDF6-7 and PDF28, not complete31-page reading.</p>\n<h2 id=\"resources-and-organized-activity\">Resources and organized activity</h2>\n<p>Reset.Tech Australia&#x27;s own2024 transparency report describes a duty-of-care roundtable, paper, small advocacy coalition, review submissions and parliamentary evidence. Its finance page lists Reset.Tech(US), Internet Society Foundation, Susan McKinnon Foundation, Boundless Foundation, Manniferra (spelling as printed), an unnamed private donor, and NSW Government support specifically for attendance at the social-media summit. No amounts or award terms appear there. This is recipient-reported funding; it cannot attribute the duty campaign&#x27;s expenses to any particular donor, treat summit travel support as state commissioning, or establish donor editorial rights. Sources: http[local research file] , printed pp6,37-38 and scoped project passages. Not read cover-to-cover. The2024 funding roster differs from the earlier article&#x27;s roster; do not conflate periods or infer withdrawal.</p>\n<p>Current naming needs care: the former Online Safety Act Network announced its change to Online Safety Network on1September2026, expressly expanding attention to AI and emerging technologies. It retains focus on online-safety implementation while advocating product-safety regulation for AI chatbots and broader digital regulation. This is explicit organizational scope expansion, not an inferred AI connection from a name. Sources: http[local research file] (full body) and http[local research file] (current mission/leadership; logo carousel is not a funding or control record).</p>\n<h2 id=\"implication-and-next-records\">Implication and next records</h2>\n<p>This is a documented transfer and adaptation of regulatory ideas: model authors and UK civil-society coordination, collaboration with Australian advocates, recipient-side citation, then a draft legislative process. It gives the campaign a concrete UK/Australia bridge. It also preserves the substantive disagreement: advocates wanted a broader duty than the eventual UK implementation, and Australia&#x27;s draft must be assessed on its own clauses. The material does not connect the September2026 draft to ControlAI direction or a common financial command.</p>\n<p>Prior local kidron-money.md records an Indigo grant to5Rights and William Perrin&#x27;s trustee/grant-governance role; that is a useful older money lead, not refreshed here. Indigo&#x27;s current biography returned a redirect page. No new financial edge should rely on that failed refresh. The most discriminating remaining records are the review&#x27;s drafting correspondence and submission-response matrix, contemporary consultation invitations/version logs, and the grant agreements funding the relevant Australian advocacy work. Public statements alone do not resolve approval rights or earmarking.</p>\n<p>The user&#x27;s autonomy objection supplies a concrete audit question: does each obligation protect a user&#x27;s ability to choose, or permit another institution to suppress a lawful choice without that user&#x27;s agreement? The mechanism must be answered clause by clause, keeping stated aims separate from foreseeable effects.</p>",
        "path": "duty-care-wave-2026-09-09/policy-lineage.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w10-duty-s-review",
          "w10-duty-s-carnegie2022",
          "w10-duty-s-network68",
          "w10-duty-s-joint-article",
          "w10-duty-s-reset70",
          "w10-duty-s-network-rename"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded lineage run after the recorded assurance forest review. Draft legal operation and access are separate companion notes.\n\n## A direct intellectual and advocacy connection\n\nAustralia's official statutory review, section 5.5, printed p53, attributes the overarching duty-of-care conception to Lorna Woods and William Perrin. It cites Carnegie UK's 2019 model bill and its 2021 criticism of the narrower UK scheme, then favors a singular Australian duty. It directly quotes Reset.Tech Australia's submission70 when explaining why content-specific duties would be insufficient. This is recipient-side acknowledgment of models and submitted reasoning, stronger than a shared vocabulary or conference roster. It does not allocate final clause authorship to those advocates. Source: http[local research file] . Reading scope: primary indexed section5.5 text and footnotes34-38; full PDF reader exceeded13MB limit and both ordinary downloads timed out, so no full-report reading or original custody claimed.\n\nCarnegie UK's January2022 submission to Australia's House Select Committee says its clerk invited the submission. It proposes platform risk assessment, mitigation and ongoing supervision, with a stronger regulator and cross-border cooperation. Its envisaged interventions include changes to visibility, forwarding and message prompts, while acknowledging expression and proportionality. That is documented historical submission and intended mechanism, not proof each intervention was enacted. Source: http[local research file] . All six pages read in web rendering, especially paragraphs1,9,19-23. The document itself dates January2022 despite misleading search metadata.\n\nThe Online Safety Act Network's June2024 submission68 names Maeve Walsh as lead and Lorna Woods as principal adviser. It explicitly promotes Australian alignment with UK/EU regulation to strengthen regulators against multinational firms. Its approach covers design, operation, resourcing and business models, while warning that systems measures and content interventions cannot be completely separated. It also warns against unnecessary overmoderation and stresses privacy-by-design. Source: http[local research file] . Entire ten-page substantive rendering read. This is an advocate's proposal; the government host is not government endorsement of every statement.\n\nA further direct working relationship is a jointly authored 22April2024 article by Rys Farthing and Woods advocating a singular Australian duty and discussing the UK divergence. The author disclosure says Reset Australia received organizational support from Reset Global, Luminate and Internet Society Foundation at that time. It does not identify a grant commissioning this article or funding Woods personally. Its claim about technology companies preferring the narrower scheme is author interpretation, not a recovered company instruction. Source: http[local research file] . Full substantive body/bylines/disclosure read. Hosted outlet identity may have changed; preserve date and original authors rather than treating this as a new2026 article.\n\nReset's submission70 explicitly names Woods/Perrin's model and covers access/content creation, discovery, user tools and platform tools. Its singular-duty argument appears on printed pp4-5; later printed p26 proposes vetted researcher access including third-sector organizations. That is a potential institutional-benefit design, not an awarded right to Reset or proof of control over platform data. Source: http[local research file] . Scoped passages PDF6-7 and PDF28, not complete31-page reading.\n\n## Resources and organized activity\n\nReset.Tech Australia's own2024 transparency report describes a duty-of-care roundtable, paper, small advocacy coalition, review submissions and parliamentary evidence. Its finance page lists Reset.Tech(US), Internet Society Foundation, Susan McKinnon Foundation, Boundless Foundation, Manniferra (spelling as printed), an unnamed private donor, and NSW Government support specifically for attendance at the social-media summit. No amounts or award terms appear there. This is recipient-reported funding; it cannot attribute the duty campaign's expenses to any particular donor, treat summit travel support as state commissioning, or establish donor editorial rights. Sources: http[local research file] , printed pp6,37-38 and scoped project passages. Not read cover-to-cover. The2024 funding roster differs from the earlier article's roster; do not conflate periods or infer withdrawal.\n\nCurrent naming needs care: the former Online Safety Act Network announced its change to Online Safety Network on1September2026, expressly expanding attention to AI and emerging technologies. It retains focus on online-safety implementation while advocating product-safety regulation for AI chatbots and broader digital regulation. This is explicit organizational scope expansion, not an inferred AI connection from a name. Sources: http[local research file] (full body) and http[local research file] (current mission/leadership; logo carousel is not a funding or control record).\n\n## Implication and next records\n\nThis is a documented transfer and adaptation of regulatory ideas: model authors and UK civil-society coordination, collaboration with Australian advocates, recipient-side citation, then a draft legislative process. It gives the campaign a concrete UK/Australia bridge. It also preserves the substantive disagreement: advocates wanted a broader duty than the eventual UK implementation, and Australia's draft must be assessed on its own clauses. The material does not connect the September2026 draft to ControlAI direction or a common financial command.\n\nPrior local kidron-money.md records an Indigo grant to5Rights and William Perrin's trustee/grant-governance role; that is a useful older money lead, not refreshed here. Indigo's current biography returned a redirect page. No new financial edge should rely on that failed refresh. The most discriminating remaining records are the review's drafting correspondence and submission-response matrix, contemporary consultation invitations/version logs, and the grant agreements funding the relevant Australian advocacy work. Public statements alone do not resolve approval rights or earmarking.\n\nThe user's autonomy objection supplies a concrete audit question: does each obligation protect a user's ability to choose, or permit another institution to suppress a lawful choice without that user's agreement? The mechanism must be answered clause by clause, keeping stated aims separate from foreseeable effects.\n",
        "file": "research/duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure",
        "title": "DoubleVerify / Check My Ads: preservation demand and the distinct Adalytics complaint",
        "description": "Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This packet addresses the published April 2025 preservation letter and a finite public counterpart check. It does not adjudicate the competing technical claims, establish current litigation status, or investigate underlying harmful material.",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This packet addresses the published April 2025 preservation letter and a finite public counterpart check. It does not adjudicate the competing technical claims, establish current litigation status, or investigate underlying harmful material.</p>\n<p>The concrete pressure mechanism is a lawyer&#x27;s notice of anticipated litigation plus a broad preservation-and-confirmation demand. The next observed judicial step belongs to a different recipient: the acquired May 2025 complaint sues Adalytics Research LLC, not Check My Ads Institute. These should be separate relationships in any graph.</p>\n<h2 id=\"1-what-the-actual-letter-demanded\">1. What the actual letter demanded</h2>\n<p>The recipient-published, redacted [14 April 2025 letter](http[local research file] is one page on Paul Hastings letterhead, visibly signed Bradley J. Bondi, acting for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc., and addressed to Arielle Garcia care of Check My Ads Institute. It identifies possible defamation, tortious interference and injurious falsehood concerning the March 28 Adalytics bot report and related public statements. It says Check My Ads should anticipate litigation and asks for email confirmation by noon EDT on 16 April that records will be preserved. The requested scope includes documents, messages and electronic information under its possession, custody or control relating to DoubleVerify, the named reports, other Adalytics posts referencing DV, communications with regulators or government officials about DV, and communications with Adalytics generally. [PDF1, both substantive paragraphs; full page text and image inspected.]</p>\n<p>This copy demands preservation and confirmation, not immediate document production, retraction, cessation of publication, damages or a confidentiality undertaking. The lawyer asserts the litigation posture; the letter is not a court order and does not by itself settle the legally enforceable preservation scope. No confirmation response or implementation record was acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2-recipient-response-is-evidence-of-objection-not-an-adjudication\">2. Recipient response is evidence of objection, not an adjudication</h2>\n<p>The [16 April Check My Ads statement](http[local research file] is credited to Nandini &amp; Claire. It reports receipt on April 14, says it will comply with its legal obligations, objects that the demand is overbroad, and invokes speech and government-communication protections. It stands by its work and says its work will continue. Those are the recipient&#x27;s positions. The public statement and publication of the letter do not prove that no chilling effect occurred; equally, they do not establish actual silencing, a judicial overbreadth ruling, completed preservation or production. [Official reader lines18–36, entire substantive statement read.]</p>\n<p>Ordinary GET returned403. The saved HTML is only that error response. The already-readable official-site text is retained as <code>counter-statement.reader.txt</code>; it is not an HTML original. No alternate language, mirror, form or repeated failed GET was used.</p>\n<h2 id=\"3-dvs-public-substantive-counterpart-predates-the-letter\">3. DV&#x27;s public substantive counterpart predates the letter</h2>\n<p>DV&#x27;s [7 April rebuttal](http[local research file] disputes the report&#x27;s treatment of bot traffic, billing, code attribution and detection. It says impressions can be removed from billable counts after delivery and characterizes the research and Check My Ads amplification as misleading. It also specifically alleges inaccurate representations to federal agencies and Congress. This is a useful rival explanation for DV&#x27;s action: it publicly presents the dispute as protection against false commercial claims. It is DV&#x27;s account, not an independently audited result, and predates rather than responds to the April 14 letter. No direct DV public answer to the recipient&#x27;s April 16 constitutional objection was located in the finite pass. [Read title/date, opening takeaways and body through technical standards discussion; official reader lines2–77, with related passage95–97. Original HTML retained; no linked research, bot logs, billing data or third-party standards independently audited in this lane.]</p>\n<h2 id=\"4-a-filed-case-was-found-but-do-not-change-its-defendant\">4. A filed case was found, but do not change its defendant</h2>\n<p>An [AdExchanger-hosted republication of the stamped complaint](http[local research file] records Document1 filed12 May2025, civil action8:25-cv-01535, US District Court for the District of Maryland. Plaintiffs are DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc.; the sole named defendant in this original complaint is Adalytics Research, LLC. Paragraph68 alleges coordination with Check My Ads to amplify statements. That is a plaintiff allegation, not a finding or a claim that Check My Ads was sued in this document. [PDF1 caption and opening; PDF23 paragraphs68–70.]</p>\n<p>The requested remedies include compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs and fees, and an order for retraction and corrective advertising. They are prayers for relief, not granted remedies. The signature page lists Paul Hastings counsel, including Bondi, alongside signing counsel Kwame J. Manley. This gives documentary continuity of counsel and subject matter, not proof of a particular preservation response or a case against Check My Ads. [PDF31 prayer A–E; PDF32 signature.]</p>\n<p>Custody is a publisher&#x27;s copy of a filed pleading bearing court filing headers, not a fresh court-docket acquisition. Read PDF1,23–24,29–32 only; the complete32-page PDF was retained and extracted, but intervening factual allegations and all counts were not fully read. No answer, amended complaint, dismissal, judgment, settlement, production order or completed corrective publication was acquired. Current case status remains outside this packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"structural-interpretation-and-unresolved-record\">Structural interpretation and unresolved record</h2>\n<p>Two mechanisms are now evidenced: DV counsel to Check My Ads, preservation demand under a stated litigation threat; and DV corporate plaintiffs to Adalytics, filed claims seeking damages and correction. The shared subject matter and counsel do not erase their different addressees or procedural states. A public research-to-lawmakers route was within the letter&#x27;s requested preservation scope; it was not shown to be prohibited by an exercised court power.</p>\n<p>The most discriminating missing records are Check My Ads&#x27; actual response/confirmation and any later filed instrument specifically naming it; for the Adalytics branch, the court&#x27;s subsequent disposition or an executed settlement would distinguish requested correction from achieved correction. A public rebuttal and a demand letter can be both reputation defense and pressure on a critic; these sources alone do not decide the merits or measure downstream chilling.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-search-and-custody-boundary\">Finite search and custody boundary</h2>\n<p>Seven discovery queries were run: exact statement title on Check My Ads; DoubleVerify with April14/2025/preservation; <code>site.doubleverify.com</code> with Check My Ads/legal letter (literal malformed domain operator, not treated as an exhaustive domain search); DoubleVerify/Bradley/Check My Ads; DoubleVerify/Check My Ads/April2025/response; <code>site:doubleverify.com</code> with Adalytics/May12,2025/lawsuit; and <code>site:doubleverify.com</code> with Check My Ads/letter. Read the exact statement and linked letter, the discovered DV response, and scoped portions of the directly surfaced complaint. Secondary news results were discovery context only, not proof of the operative demands or outcome. No broader donor, legal-firm, related-company, or separate-lawsuit branch opened.</p>\n<p>Successful original captures: recipient-posted redacted letter, DV response HTML and media-hosted complaint republication. One403 statement-original route closed; official reader substitute retained. Manifest <code>counter-captures.json</code> records hashes and precise scope. No forms, accounts, private communications, customer records, listed-site visits or harmful images accessed. An incidental unrelated local memory read was rejected by automatic approval review and was not retried; it supplied no evidence.</p>",
        "path": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09/counterpressure.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-preservation-letter",
          "w30-class-s-dv-rebuttal",
          "w30-class-s-dv-complaint",
          "w30-class-s-cma-response"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This packet addresses the published April 2025 preservation letter and a finite public counterpart check. It does not adjudicate the competing technical claims, establish current litigation status, or investigate underlying harmful material.\n\nThe concrete pressure mechanism is a lawyer's notice of anticipated litigation plus a broad preservation-and-confirmation demand. The next observed judicial step belongs to a different recipient: the acquired May 2025 complaint sues Adalytics Research LLC, not Check My Ads Institute. These should be separate relationships in any graph.\n\n## 1. What the actual letter demanded\n\nThe recipient-published, redacted 14 April 2025 letter (see source references) is one page on Paul Hastings letterhead, visibly signed Bradley J. Bondi, acting for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc., and addressed to Arielle Garcia care of Check My Ads Institute. It identifies possible defamation, tortious interference and injurious falsehood concerning the March 28 Adalytics bot report and related public statements. It says Check My Ads should anticipate litigation and asks for email confirmation by noon EDT on 16 April that records will be preserved. The requested scope includes documents, messages and electronic information under its possession, custody or control relating to DoubleVerify, the named reports, other Adalytics posts referencing DV, communications with regulators or government officials about DV, and communications with Adalytics generally. [PDF1, both substantive paragraphs; full page text and image inspected.]\n\nThis copy demands preservation and confirmation, not immediate document production, retraction, cessation of publication, damages or a confidentiality undertaking. The lawyer asserts the litigation posture; the letter is not a court order and does not by itself settle the legally enforceable preservation scope. No confirmation response or implementation record was acquired.\n\n## 2. Recipient response is evidence of objection, not an adjudication\n\nThe 16 April Check My Ads statement (see source references) is credited to Nandini & Claire. It reports receipt on April 14, says it will comply with its legal obligations, objects that the demand is overbroad, and invokes speech and government-communication protections. It stands by its work and says its work will continue. Those are the recipient's positions. The public statement and publication of the letter do not prove that no chilling effect occurred; equally, they do not establish actual silencing, a judicial overbreadth ruling, completed preservation or production. [Official reader lines18–36, entire substantive statement read.]\n\nOrdinary GET returned403. The saved HTML is only that error response. The already-readable official-site text is retained as `counter-statement.reader.txt`; it is not an HTML original. No alternate language, mirror, form or repeated failed GET was used.\n\n## 3. DV's public substantive counterpart predates the letter\n\nDV's 7 April rebuttal (see source references) disputes the report's treatment of bot traffic, billing, code attribution and detection. It says impressions can be removed from billable counts after delivery and characterizes the research and Check My Ads amplification as misleading. It also specifically alleges inaccurate representations to federal agencies and Congress. This is a useful rival explanation for DV's action: it publicly presents the dispute as protection against false commercial claims. It is DV's account, not an independently audited result, and predates rather than responds to the April 14 letter. No direct DV public answer to the recipient's April 16 constitutional objection was located in the finite pass. [Read title/date, opening takeaways and body through technical standards discussion; official reader lines2–77, with related passage95–97. Original HTML retained; no linked research, bot logs, billing data or third-party standards independently audited in this lane.]\n\n## 4. A filed case was found, but do not change its defendant\n\nAn AdExchanger-hosted republication of the stamped complaint (see source references) records Document1 filed12 May2025, civil action8:25-cv-01535, US District Court for the District of Maryland. Plaintiffs are DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc.; the sole named defendant in this original complaint is Adalytics Research, LLC. Paragraph68 alleges coordination with Check My Ads to amplify statements. That is a plaintiff allegation, not a finding or a claim that Check My Ads was sued in this document. [PDF1 caption and opening; PDF23 paragraphs68–70.]\n\nThe requested remedies include compensation/disgorgement, punitive damages, costs and fees, and an order for retraction and corrective advertising. They are prayers for relief, not granted remedies. The signature page lists Paul Hastings counsel, including Bondi, alongside signing counsel Kwame J. Manley. This gives documentary continuity of counsel and subject matter, not proof of a particular preservation response or a case against Check My Ads. [PDF31 prayer A–E; PDF32 signature.]\n\nCustody is a publisher's copy of a filed pleading bearing court filing headers, not a fresh court-docket acquisition. Read PDF1,23–24,29–32 only; the complete32-page PDF was retained and extracted, but intervening factual allegations and all counts were not fully read. No answer, amended complaint, dismissal, judgment, settlement, production order or completed corrective publication was acquired. Current case status remains outside this packet.\n\n## Structural interpretation and unresolved record\n\nTwo mechanisms are now evidenced: DV counsel to Check My Ads, preservation demand under a stated litigation threat; and DV corporate plaintiffs to Adalytics, filed claims seeking damages and correction. The shared subject matter and counsel do not erase their different addressees or procedural states. A public research-to-lawmakers route was within the letter's requested preservation scope; it was not shown to be prohibited by an exercised court power.\n\nThe most discriminating missing records are Check My Ads' actual response/confirmation and any later filed instrument specifically naming it; for the Adalytics branch, the court's subsequent disposition or an executed settlement would distinguish requested correction from achieved correction. A public rebuttal and a demand letter can be both reputation defense and pressure on a critic; these sources alone do not decide the merits or measure downstream chilling.\n\n## Finite search and custody boundary\n\nSeven discovery queries were run: exact statement title on Check My Ads; DoubleVerify with April14/2025/preservation; `site.doubleverify.com` with Check My Ads/legal letter (literal malformed domain operator, not treated as an exhaustive domain search); DoubleVerify/Bradley/Check My Ads; DoubleVerify/Check My Ads/April2025/response; `site:doubleverify.com` with Adalytics/May12,2025/lawsuit; and `site:doubleverify.com` with Check My Ads/letter. Read the exact statement and linked letter, the discovered DV response, and scoped portions of the directly surfaced complaint. Secondary news results were discovery context only, not proof of the operative demands or outcome. No broader donor, legal-firm, related-company, or separate-lawsuit branch opened.\n\nSuccessful original captures: recipient-posted redacted letter, DV response HTML and media-hosted complaint republication. One403 statement-original route closed; official reader substitute retained. Manifest `counter-captures.json` records hashes and precise scope. No forms, accounts, private communications, customer records, listed-site visits or harmful images accessed. An incidental unrelated local memory read was rejected by automatic approval review and was not retried; it supplied no evidence.\n",
        "file": "research/dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-counterpressure.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources",
        "title": "IWF–DoubleVerify membership: fees, licensed resources and a collective governance route",
        "description": "9 September 2026. The public record now identifies DoubleVerify's membership start and contribution band, and describes what membership supplies. It also shows a route for funding members to participate in governance. None of the inspected records gives DV a reserved board seat, authority to dictate an individual content assessment, or a payment tied to a pa",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. The public record now identifies DoubleVerify&#x27;s membership start and contribution band, and describes what membership supplies. It also shows a route for funding members to participate in governance. None of the inspected records gives DV a reserved board seat, authority to dictate an individual content assessment, or a payment tied to a particular removal. Acquisition is closed after four directly relevant current pages and reuse of retained records.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-disclosed-about-dvs-contribution\">What is disclosed about DV&#x27;s contribution</h2>\n<p>The current [IWF member directory](http[local research file] places DoubleVerify beneath the heading <strong>Members contributing over £25,000</strong>, with membership since <strong>1 April 2025</strong>. I checked the retained HTML card and its nearest preceding H2 heading, as well as the reader. This is IWF&#x27;s public contribution-band disclosure, not a £25,000 exact amount, an independently reconciled receipt or a dated2025 invoice. No upper bound is assumed. The snapshot does not identify when DV entered that band or which accounting period it covers. Original-derived191 and210–212; reader401 and451–455.</p>\n<p>IWF&#x27;s [current pricing page](http[local research file] describes annual fees paid in GBP, calculated by sector and company size, ranging from £5,000+ to £100,000+. It says membership fees directly support front-line work and that the structure is developed with members. This establishes the direction and stated purpose of the membership resource flow: member funds to IWF. It is a current undated framework, not proof of the tariff or terms accepted by DV in2025. The directory band and annual framework should remain separately attributed rather than manufactured into a specific annual payment. Original-derived57–68; reader53–58.</p>\n<p>The retained [FY2025 accounts](http[local research file] PDF21 income policy, distinguish subscription amounts receivable for services from donations and grants. PDF29 says deferred income relates to subscriptions and licence fees. Recognition is therefore not interchangeable with cash receipt. The accounts end31March2025, before the directory&#x27;s stated DV membership start, and no DV-specific transaction was identified in the inspected passages. They cannot establish its subsequent payment. No grant to IWF from DV or outcome-based bounty is shown in this packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-resources-flow-in-return\">What resources flow in return</h2>\n<p>The [membership overview](http[local research file] expressly describes licensed access to dynamic blocking lists and alerts, with the underlying imagery assessed by IWF analysts. The [benefits page](http[local research file] also offers expertise, direct analyst contact, research/intelligence, networking with decision makers, policy-development participation and membership publicity/logo use. These are meaningful services and relationship benefits. They are public descriptions rather than an executed service commitment or proof that DV used every opportunity. Overview original-derived85–88 and100–110, reader74/84–87; benefits original-derived62–79, reader57–81.</p>\n<p>The accepted April/May2025 partnership records separately establish the stated plan to incorporate IWF&#x27;s URL List into DV&#x27;s category, followed by a later participant testimonial about integration. Those retained records are reused, not reacquired here. The public NCMEC notification material described in DV&#x27;s earlier category work is a different input. Membership gives licensed access, not a demonstrated right to redistribute raw IWF lists freely. DV&#x27;s separately reported free distribution of its own Highly Illicit category should not be treated as proof of the underlying IWF licence&#x27;s sublicensing or derivative-use terms.</p>\n<h2 id=\"governance-access-is-real-while-individual-assessment-control-remains-unestablished\">Governance access is real, while individual assessment control remains unestablished</h2>\n<p>The current membership overview says members may suggest policy ideas and <strong>apply</strong> to join the Funding Council. It does not promise an automatic council seat. Original-derived107–109; reader86.</p>\n<p>The reused FY2025 report, PDF11, adds the structural route: all members have the opportunity to nominate representatives to the Funding Council; that council supports the board with industry advice and elects three industry trustees. The described eleven-person board comprises an independent chair, six other independent trustees, three industry trustees and one co-opted trustee. The board approves appointments through the described processes. These are the report&#x27;s governance arrangements, not an assertion that the current2026 composition is unchanged. They establish an institutional channel for industry voice; they do not establish that DV nominated a representative, sat on the council or obtained any seat itself.</p>\n<p>IWF is identified in that report as company03426366 and charity1112398. The report&#x27;s legal-member/guarantee discussion is not used to infer that the public DV brand entry proves a specific corporate signatory or guarantor. The member agreement, legal entity and applicable constitutional rights remain unacquired at that level.</p>\n<p>No inspected membership description provides DV a veto over IWF&#x27;s assessment of a URL or image, an entitlement to suppress its own adverse assessment, or a right to demand that DV&#x27;s commercial category criteria become IWF&#x27;s criteria. Equally, absence of those rights here is not proof that an undisclosed agreement contains none. PDF33 note19&#x27;s transaction-related disclosure must not be stretched into proof that funders have no policy influence; the council mechanism shows why those propositions differ.</p>\n<h2 id=\"strongest-defensible-interpretation-and-reopening-record\">Strongest defensible interpretation and reopening record</h2>\n<p>The disclosed exchange is recurring membership support in return for licensed technical resources, expertise, reputation and opportunities for policy/governance participation. It fits ordinary service-support membership and also creates channels through which an industry member can contribute ideas. Money plus participation does not establish control of a particular assessment. No payment-per-blocking theory is supported by the acquired fee model.</p>\n<p>The useful next record is DV&#x27;s executed2025 membership agreement and fee/service schedule, identifying the exact legal signatory, invoiced period/amount, licensed dataset and permitted derivative distribution, plus any assessment-review, council or conflict provisions. An invoice/receipt would resolve payment without resolving governance; council nomination/election records would resolve exercised participation without proving content decisions. No contract request or contact was made. Older other-company agreements, unrelated donors and generic fundraising genealogy were not pursued.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-scope\">Custody and scope</h2>\n<p><code>membership-captures.json</code> records four successful original HTML captures and the reused original accounts, with exact reading scopes and hashes. <code>membership-retrieval-scope.json</code> records the two limited searches and closed acquisition boundary. The directory was read for DV&#x27;s card and governing heading only; other names returned in its body were not inventoried. No images, lists, list entries, harmful-content locations, forms, accounts or visible UI were opened or operated. The source pages may contain navigation to such services; links were not followed. No case, graph, ZIP, current-work or forest was changed.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Original</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><code>membership-directory.html</code></td>\n<td><code>857cf31d4077b15c195388c857f2cb0ebb3cb97a900b27827779b989d32b9425</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>membership-fees.html</code></td>\n<td><code>0bb92583593a6b52dcb776644804fddfb2e59f5aca4bfa9c23091449db98b807</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>membership-benefits.html</code></td>\n<td><code>0c72ba0d86a6f8fe140c752211aa0c65ace4884374ce2957b91fdf29f348a095</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>membership-overview.html</code></td>\n<td><code>835152238c6feeecd487821c4194d02ef1722a9be00dd10b7148c0a7ea4b8835</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Existing <code>recipient-iwf2025.pdf</code></td>\n<td><code>0f96cd95f93b3155cb46163dc64fe04604148d8a57e6d9f5e99c5459d465d433</code></td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>",
        "path": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09/membership-resources.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-iwf-directory",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-fees",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-benefits",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-membership",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-accounts"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. The public record now identifies DoubleVerify's membership start and contribution band, and describes what membership supplies. It also shows a route for funding members to participate in governance. None of the inspected records gives DV a reserved board seat, authority to dictate an individual content assessment, or a payment tied to a particular removal. Acquisition is closed after four directly relevant current pages and reuse of retained records.\n\n## What is disclosed about DV's contribution\n\nThe current IWF member directory (see source references) places DoubleVerify beneath the heading **Members contributing over £25,000**, with membership since **1 April 2025**. I checked the retained HTML card and its nearest preceding H2 heading, as well as the reader. This is IWF's public contribution-band disclosure, not a £25,000 exact amount, an independently reconciled receipt or a dated2025 invoice. No upper bound is assumed. The snapshot does not identify when DV entered that band or which accounting period it covers. Original-derived191 and210–212; reader401 and451–455.\n\nIWF's current pricing page (see source references) describes annual fees paid in GBP, calculated by sector and company size, ranging from £5,000+ to £100,000+. It says membership fees directly support front-line work and that the structure is developed with members. This establishes the direction and stated purpose of the membership resource flow: member funds to IWF. It is a current undated framework, not proof of the tariff or terms accepted by DV in2025. The directory band and annual framework should remain separately attributed rather than manufactured into a specific annual payment. Original-derived57–68; reader53–58.\n\nThe retained FY2025 accounts (see source references) PDF21 income policy, distinguish subscription amounts receivable for services from donations and grants. PDF29 says deferred income relates to subscriptions and licence fees. Recognition is therefore not interchangeable with cash receipt. The accounts end31March2025, before the directory's stated DV membership start, and no DV-specific transaction was identified in the inspected passages. They cannot establish its subsequent payment. No grant to IWF from DV or outcome-based bounty is shown in this packet.\n\n## What resources flow in return\n\nThe membership overview (see source references) expressly describes licensed access to dynamic blocking lists and alerts, with the underlying imagery assessed by IWF analysts. The benefits page (see source references) also offers expertise, direct analyst contact, research/intelligence, networking with decision makers, policy-development participation and membership publicity/logo use. These are meaningful services and relationship benefits. They are public descriptions rather than an executed service commitment or proof that DV used every opportunity. Overview original-derived85–88 and100–110, reader74/84–87; benefits original-derived62–79, reader57–81.\n\nThe accepted April/May2025 partnership records separately establish the stated plan to incorporate IWF's URL List into DV's category, followed by a later participant testimonial about integration. Those retained records are reused, not reacquired here. The public NCMEC notification material described in DV's earlier category work is a different input. Membership gives licensed access, not a demonstrated right to redistribute raw IWF lists freely. DV's separately reported free distribution of its own Highly Illicit category should not be treated as proof of the underlying IWF licence's sublicensing or derivative-use terms.\n\n## Governance access is real, while individual assessment control remains unestablished\n\nThe current membership overview says members may suggest policy ideas and **apply** to join the Funding Council. It does not promise an automatic council seat. Original-derived107–109; reader86.\n\nThe reused FY2025 report, PDF11, adds the structural route: all members have the opportunity to nominate representatives to the Funding Council; that council supports the board with industry advice and elects three industry trustees. The described eleven-person board comprises an independent chair, six other independent trustees, three industry trustees and one co-opted trustee. The board approves appointments through the described processes. These are the report's governance arrangements, not an assertion that the current2026 composition is unchanged. They establish an institutional channel for industry voice; they do not establish that DV nominated a representative, sat on the council or obtained any seat itself.\n\nIWF is identified in that report as company03426366 and charity1112398. The report's legal-member/guarantee discussion is not used to infer that the public DV brand entry proves a specific corporate signatory or guarantor. The member agreement, legal entity and applicable constitutional rights remain unacquired at that level.\n\nNo inspected membership description provides DV a veto over IWF's assessment of a URL or image, an entitlement to suppress its own adverse assessment, or a right to demand that DV's commercial category criteria become IWF's criteria. Equally, absence of those rights here is not proof that an undisclosed agreement contains none. PDF33 note19's transaction-related disclosure must not be stretched into proof that funders have no policy influence; the council mechanism shows why those propositions differ.\n\n## Strongest defensible interpretation and reopening record\n\nThe disclosed exchange is recurring membership support in return for licensed technical resources, expertise, reputation and opportunities for policy/governance participation. It fits ordinary service-support membership and also creates channels through which an industry member can contribute ideas. Money plus participation does not establish control of a particular assessment. No payment-per-blocking theory is supported by the acquired fee model.\n\nThe useful next record is DV's executed2025 membership agreement and fee/service schedule, identifying the exact legal signatory, invoiced period/amount, licensed dataset and permitted derivative distribution, plus any assessment-review, council or conflict provisions. An invoice/receipt would resolve payment without resolving governance; council nomination/election records would resolve exercised participation without proving content decisions. No contract request or contact was made. Older other-company agreements, unrelated donors and generic fundraising genealogy were not pursued.\n\n## Custody and scope\n\n`membership-captures.json` records four successful original HTML captures and the reused original accounts, with exact reading scopes and hashes. `membership-retrieval-scope.json` records the two limited searches and closed acquisition boundary. The directory was read for DV's card and governing heading only; other names returned in its body were not inventoried. No images, lists, list entries, harmful-content locations, forms, accounts or visible UI were opened or operated. The source pages may contain navigation to such services; links were not followed. No case, graph, ZIP, current-work or forest was changed.\n\n| Original | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- |\n| `membership-directory.html` | `857cf31d4077b15c195388c857f2cb0ebb3cb97a900b27827779b989d32b9425` |\n| `membership-fees.html` | `0bb92583593a6b52dcb776644804fddfb2e59f5aca4bfa9c23091449db98b807` |\n| `membership-benefits.html` | `0c72ba0d86a6f8fe140c752211aa0c65ace4884374ce2957b91fdf29f348a095` |\n| `membership-overview.html` | `835152238c6feeecd487821c4194d02ef1722a9be00dd10b7148c0a7ea4b8835` |\n| Existing `recipient-iwf2025.pdf` | `0f96cd95f93b3155cb46163dc64fe04604148d8a57e6d9f5e99c5459d465d433` |\n",
        "file": "research/dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-membership-resources.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure",
        "title": "The February2025 pressure route into advertising defaults",
        "description": "9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. The contemporaneous record identifies public criticism, advocacy, Senate demands and vendor changes. It does not establish a sole cause, a government enforcement order or a UK-government instruction.",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. The contemporaneous record identifies public criticism, advocacy, Senate demands and vendor changes. It does not establish a sole cause, a government enforcement order or a UK-government instruction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"an-identifiable-request-and-a-deadline\">An identifiable request and a deadline</h2>\n<p>The [Blackburn office release of7February2025](http[local research file] states that Senators Marsha Blackburn and Richard Blumenthal received Adalytics research before public release and sent letters to Google, Amazon, DoubleVerify, Integral Ad Science, MRC and TAG. Three original letters are retained and fully read here; the other recipients are established by this release, not a reading of their letters.</p>\n<p>The [DV letter](http[local research file] dated7February and addressed to Mark Zagorski, seeks answers by14February. It asks about remediation, site blocking, advertiser notification, annual use of NCMEC transparency reports, reports made to authorities and revenue connected to the questioned placements. It also criticizes limited page-level reporting. These are requests from senators, not acquired proof of the underlying allegations, a subpoena or a completed sanction. The footnotes identify the2021 outbound NCMEC-notification table, an explicit input reference. Its notice methodology remains distinct from a judicial finding about the whole service.</p>\n<p>The [MRC letter](http[local research file] PDF1–4, challenges the accreditor to review vendors and explain possible revocation, audits and fee policies. It cites2018verification guidance; the letter is evidence of the senators&#x27; interpretation and demand, not a fresh reading of that standard or an established violation. This adds leverage over the certification on which commercial trust rests, beyond a direct complaint to the vendor.</p>\n<p>The [TAG letter](http[local research file] PDF3 question8, makes the scope dispute explicit: it asks whether certified companies may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity if their ads avoid the prohibited content itself. Questions on review/revocation and a14February response deadline appear onPDF2. This is documented pressure toward considering the funding of a whole website, not merely adjacent content. It is not proof that all such sites were subsequently blocked or that the letter changed TAG&#x27;s rules.</p>\n<h2 id=\"advocacy-and-vendor-response\">Advocacy and vendor response</h2>\n<p>[Check My Ads&#x27;7February release](http[local research file] claims its advocacy helped the inquiry. Its named policy/operating leaders urge transparency and advertiser pressure on vendors and accreditors. That is an actor&#x27;s account of its contribution; the acquired Senate release independently establishes the letters and early research access but does not credit CMA with drafting them. The TAG letter&#x27;s footnote7 separately cites an Arielle Garcia trial-update article; citation is an actual information route, not authorship of the letter. The underlying trial testimony and complete Adalytics technical report were not inspected in this lane, and no harmful destination was visited.</p>\n<p>DV&#x27;s retained7February statement acknowledges additional blocking/review in response to the report while disputing the interpretation of its technology and the specific accusation about placements beside illegal imagery. It announces development of a P2P category. Its13February announcement follows the letters and precedes their requested response deadline; the25February URL-reporting announcement overlaps another criticism. The April24 progress claim follows these, and the separate IWF membership source dates membership from1April2025. Chronological and topical convergence support a reactive commercial/political pressure account; they do not isolate which actor caused which decision, prove compliance with the letters, or establish IWF as the originator of the February policy.</p>\n<h2 id=\"an-accreditor-did-not-simply-adopt-the-accusation\">An accreditor did not simply adopt the accusation</h2>\n<p>TAG&#x27;s original [2025 Impact and Compliance Report](http[local research file] visibly printedPDF20–21, reports investigations of the CSAM-monetization complaints and says none of the investigated companies violated its BSC guidelines. It cites a23-page response by Mike Zaneis to the senators, explains limits of accreditation and rejects a criminal-adjudication role. It also reports NCMEC training for its threat-exchange members. Its [3February2026 release](http[local research file] repeats the no-violations outcome. This is TAG&#x27;s own reported determination, not independent exoneration or a complete investigation file. The full23-page response, named findings and applicable underlying audit files remain unacquired. The record contradicts a simple claim that Senate pressure automatically produced certification revocations. Additional protective measures can coexist with a finding that existing rules were not breached.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes-and-what-remains\">What this changes and what remains</h2>\n<p>A concrete sequence is now supported: disputed research → claimed advocacy assistance and documented Senate letters → explicit demands for broader responsibility and certification scrutiny → vendor-reported safeguards and transparency changes → a later licensed nonprofit-data relationship. Government pressure, NGO advocacy, commercial decisions and technical inputs are separate acts. IWF&#x27;s current fee band and membership governance are in membership-resources.md; the later legal counterpressure is in the companion packet. No one-way obedient coalition is established.</p>\n<p>The highest-value missing records are DV&#x27;s actual dated reply and product-change decision record, TAG&#x27;s specifically described23-page reply and case findings, and the correspondence establishing CMA&#x27;s contribution. They would distinguish chronological proximity from exercised influence. An acquired fee schedule would answer a different financial question. No outreach was attempted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-limits\">Custody and limits</h2>\n<p>Four originals from the initial acquisition succeeded: Senate HTML and three PDFs. CMA&#x27;s ordinary GET returned403, was closed without retry, and its separately available primary reader was retained as cma-advocacy.reader.txt (not original HTML). Root read that substantive reader25–88. The Senate letters&#x27; complete reader and original-PDF text were read. The Senate release&#x27;s full substantive reader99–123 was read.</p>\n<p>TAG summary and release HTML plus29-page original PDF were retained. Its PDF text layer repeats the same brand-safety text on unrelated pages; those repetitions were not treated as multiple passages. Root rendered and visually inspectedPDF17/18, recognized that mismatch, then visually read actualPDF20–21. Only that visible brand-safety section, the summary&#x27;s due-process item and full substantive release0–27 support the substantive finding; remaining report metrics and compliance lists are outside the audit. The first report-button GET returned a normal200HTML meta redirect, initially mislabelled as a closed report route; one method correction saved the redirect and followed its explicit public target. This was not an access-denial retry; previous transport metadata is preserved.</p>\n<p>Focused searches for recipient responses returned the existing DV statement, unrelated reports and TAG&#x27;s later official report. Two exact searches for the23-page reply returned no relevant copy; that document remains a reopening lead. Search absence is not proof that no reply or public copy exists. No new standards, customer contract, live ad placement, operational list, court merits or full report-methodology audit is claimed.</p>",
        "path": "dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09/policy-pressure.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-senate-release",
          "w30-class-s-cma-advocacy",
          "w30-class-s-senate-dv",
          "w30-class-s-senate-mrc",
          "w30-class-s-senate-tag",
          "w30-class-s-tag-report",
          "w30-class-s-tag-release"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. The contemporaneous record identifies public criticism, advocacy, Senate demands and vendor changes. It does not establish a sole cause, a government enforcement order or a UK-government instruction.\n\n## An identifiable request and a deadline\n\nThe Blackburn office release of7February2025 (see source references) states that Senators Marsha Blackburn and Richard Blumenthal received Adalytics research before public release and sent letters to Google, Amazon, DoubleVerify, Integral Ad Science, MRC and TAG. Three original letters are retained and fully read here; the other recipients are established by this release, not a reading of their letters.\n\nThe DV letter (see source references) dated7February and addressed to Mark Zagorski, seeks answers by14February. It asks about remediation, site blocking, advertiser notification, annual use of NCMEC transparency reports, reports made to authorities and revenue connected to the questioned placements. It also criticizes limited page-level reporting. These are requests from senators, not acquired proof of the underlying allegations, a subpoena or a completed sanction. The footnotes identify the2021 outbound NCMEC-notification table, an explicit input reference. Its notice methodology remains distinct from a judicial finding about the whole service.\n\nThe MRC letter (see source references) PDF1–4, challenges the accreditor to review vendors and explain possible revocation, audits and fee policies. It cites2018verification guidance; the letter is evidence of the senators' interpretation and demand, not a fresh reading of that standard or an established violation. This adds leverage over the certification on which commercial trust rests, beyond a direct complaint to the vendor.\n\nThe TAG letter (see source references) PDF3 question8, makes the scope dispute explicit: it asks whether certified companies may monetize a website engaged in illegal activity if their ads avoid the prohibited content itself. Questions on review/revocation and a14February response deadline appear onPDF2. This is documented pressure toward considering the funding of a whole website, not merely adjacent content. It is not proof that all such sites were subsequently blocked or that the letter changed TAG's rules.\n\n## Advocacy and vendor response\n\nCheck My Ads'7February release (see source references) claims its advocacy helped the inquiry. Its named policy/operating leaders urge transparency and advertiser pressure on vendors and accreditors. That is an actor's account of its contribution; the acquired Senate release independently establishes the letters and early research access but does not credit CMA with drafting them. The TAG letter's footnote7 separately cites an Arielle Garcia trial-update article; citation is an actual information route, not authorship of the letter. The underlying trial testimony and complete Adalytics technical report were not inspected in this lane, and no harmful destination was visited.\n\nDV's retained7February statement acknowledges additional blocking/review in response to the report while disputing the interpretation of its technology and the specific accusation about placements beside illegal imagery. It announces development of a P2P category. Its13February announcement follows the letters and precedes their requested response deadline; the25February URL-reporting announcement overlaps another criticism. The April24 progress claim follows these, and the separate IWF membership source dates membership from1April2025. Chronological and topical convergence support a reactive commercial/political pressure account; they do not isolate which actor caused which decision, prove compliance with the letters, or establish IWF as the originator of the February policy.\n\n## An accreditor did not simply adopt the accusation\n\nTAG's original 2025 Impact and Compliance Report (see source references) visibly printedPDF20–21, reports investigations of the CSAM-monetization complaints and says none of the investigated companies violated its BSC guidelines. It cites a23-page response by Mike Zaneis to the senators, explains limits of accreditation and rejects a criminal-adjudication role. It also reports NCMEC training for its threat-exchange members. Its 3February2026 release (see source references) repeats the no-violations outcome. This is TAG's own reported determination, not independent exoneration or a complete investigation file. The full23-page response, named findings and applicable underlying audit files remain unacquired. The record contradicts a simple claim that Senate pressure automatically produced certification revocations. Additional protective measures can coexist with a finding that existing rules were not breached.\n\n## What this changes and what remains\n\nA concrete sequence is now supported: disputed research → claimed advocacy assistance and documented Senate letters → explicit demands for broader responsibility and certification scrutiny → vendor-reported safeguards and transparency changes → a later licensed nonprofit-data relationship. Government pressure, NGO advocacy, commercial decisions and technical inputs are separate acts. IWF's current fee band and membership governance are in membership-resources.md; the later legal counterpressure is in the companion packet. No one-way obedient coalition is established.\n\nThe highest-value missing records are DV's actual dated reply and product-change decision record, TAG's specifically described23-page reply and case findings, and the correspondence establishing CMA's contribution. They would distinguish chronological proximity from exercised influence. An acquired fee schedule would answer a different financial question. No outreach was attempted.\n\n## Custody and limits\n\nFour originals from the initial acquisition succeeded: Senate HTML and three PDFs. CMA's ordinary GET returned403, was closed without retry, and its separately available primary reader was retained as cma-advocacy.reader.txt (not original HTML). Root read that substantive reader25–88. The Senate letters' complete reader and original-PDF text were read. The Senate release's full substantive reader99–123 was read.\n\nTAG summary and release HTML plus29-page original PDF were retained. Its PDF text layer repeats the same brand-safety text on unrelated pages; those repetitions were not treated as multiple passages. Root rendered and visually inspectedPDF17/18, recognized that mismatch, then visually read actualPDF20–21. Only that visible brand-safety section, the summary's due-process item and full substantive release0–27 support the substantive finding; remaining report metrics and compliance lists are outside the audit. The first report-button GET returned a normal200HTML meta redirect, initially mislabelled as a closed report route; one method correction saved the redirect and followed its explicit public target. This was not an access-denial retry; previous transport metadata is preserved.\n\nFocused searches for recipient responses returned the existing DV statement, unrelated reports and TAG's later official report. Two exact searches for the23-page reply returned no relevant copy; that document remains a reopening lead. Search absence is not proof that no reply or public copy exists. No new standards, customer contract, live ad placement, operational list, court merits or full report-methodology audit is claimed.\n",
        "file": "research/dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition",
        "title": "eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting",
        "description": "Acquired and read 9 September 2026. Bounded lane closed after five focused discovery queries and full substantive judicial-text reading.",
        "html": "<p>Acquired and read 9 September 2026. Bounded lane closed after five focused discovery queries and full substantive judicial-text reading.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-and-version-custody\">Source and version custody</h2>\n<p>The source is <a>CaseMine&#x27;s republication of G062863M</a>.</p>\n<p>The complete substantive web-reader body, lines95-388, was read across two overlapping calls and retained in later-opinion.reader.txt, with no gaps in that interval. The derivative preserves the modification and unmodified body separately. No underlying declarations, contract, docket, judicial PDF or sealed exhibits were acquired. Hashes and exact search scope are in later-captures.json. Root independently retained/read its own complete reader copy.</p>\n<p><strong>The correction matters:</strong> May6 replaces the original page6 sentence with eGumball&#x27;s assertion that all its processed 2020/2021 card transactions were directly connected to written client contracts (reader124-133, decisive127). The unmodified body at229 says the opposite. This remains eGumball&#x27;s assertion, not an adjudicated reconciliation. Rehearing was denied, with no change in judgment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-was-actually-decided\">What was actually decided</h2>\n<p>Merrick Bank Corporation was the appellant. The court affirmed the denial of Merrick&#x27;s special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute. The underlying action also named Paysafe Services (US), Corp. and Visa; those parties&#x27; ultimate liability was not adjudicated here. The earlier 2023 opinion used Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions, LLC: this packet does not silently merge those legal names.</p>\n<p>The appeal applied de novo review. The two-step test first requires the defendant to establish claims arising from protected activity; only after that showing does the plaintiff need to demonstrate a probability of prevailing, described as minimal merit (printed p10; reader273-277). The actual affirmance rests on Merrick&#x27;s failure to establish protected activity under the catchall public-interest provision425.16(e)(4). Conversion was outside the motion after Merrick conceded it did not arise from protected activity (fn3; reader243).</p>\n<p>The court accepted a connection to the broad subject of credit-card security, but held that this specific confidential MATCH report did not contribute to public discussion. It considered the audience, purpose and context, not simply whether the topic affected many people (printed pp11-17; reader287-349). It expressly rejected a categorical rule excluding all confidential commercial speech from anti-SLAPP protection (reader347). Thus this is neither a ruling that private risk reports always lack protection nor a final determination that this report was false or unlawful.</p>\n<p>Merrick had separately argued forum selection, eGumball&#x27;s contractual consent, truth and common-interest privilege (printed pp7-8; reader241-249). The decision does not establish that those defenses fail on the merits. eGumball&#x27;s allegations about account restrictions, withheld funds, a fine, declined test cards and lost processing access are presented as complaint allegations (printed pp5-7; reader220-238), not findings of damages, laundering innocence or payment restoration.</p>\n<h2 id=\"two-concrete-accountability-mechanisms\">Two concrete accountability mechanisms</h2>\n<p>The court expressly applied FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. (2019), involving confidential paid website reports tagged for adult content or copyright infringement. In this opinion, that earlier case supplies the legal comparison between commercial classification for advertisers and commercial risk reporting for acquirers (printed pp13-14; reader305-319). The comparison is significant for the investigation&#x27;s structure: a privately distributed classifier does not obtain this procedural shield merely by invoking a public-interest subject. It establishes no common ownership, data feed or operational coordination between DoubleVerify and MATCH, and does not adjudicate the truth of FilmOn&#x27;s challenged classifications. The named precedent remains an unacquired next-question candidate; no separate FilmOn inquiry was opened.</p>\n<p>The court also described Merrick&#x27;s typical merchant waiver/hold-harmless clause as a contractual means of preempting MATCH claims (printed p17; reader349-351). Its statement that Merrick had failed to secure such a release from eGumball is explicitly attributed to eGumball. This is evidence of a described contractual protection mechanism and disputed assent in this case, not a holding of universal enforceability or an acquired executed agreement.</p>\n<p>The opinion&#x27;s MATCH access, confidentiality, quarterly and per-inquiry fee descriptions belong to this historical litigation record. Footnote2 expressly uses the Mastercard Rules dated 9 February 2021, which Merrick cited; no amounts are given (printed pp3-5; reader195-215). These passages must not replace the independently acquired August2026 public rules or imply that this case established current prices.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-public-record-remedy-and-exact-missing-filing\">The public-record remedy and exact missing filing</h2>\n<p>The court granted Merrick&#x27;s appellate sealing motion without prejudice on its asserted proprietary/business interests. It likewise partly granted eGumball&#x27;s motion without prejudice, but refused sealing of 28 specified documents because they were not subject to a trial-court sealing motion and no overriding interest had been explained. A trial referee was still considering overlapping sealing questions. The appellate order expressly disclaimed guidance to that proceeding and allowed a later unsealing application if the referee or trial court denied sealing (printed pp18-20; reader360-378).</p>\n<p>The disposition required eGumball, within ten days of issuance of the opinion, to file an updated public redacted brief removing redactions that discussed or cited the 28 documents. Footnote5 identifies Meehan preliminary-injunction declaration exhibits1,3,4,16,17,21,23,24,25,26,29,30,47,48,49,51,52,54,55,56,57,58,61,63,64,65,66, plus exhibit11 to his declaration opposing the anti-SLAPP motion and supporting the preliminary injunction. This is an ordered public-access change, not evidence the revised filing was actually made or of what those exhibits contain. The parties bore their own appeal costs.</p>\n<p>Two focused follow-up searches for this docket/brief and eGumball/Meehan/May2025 returned opinion republications and counsel publicity, but no revised brief or these exhibits. No account, docket challenge, sealed-document recovery or contact route was used. The precise frontier is the filed updated redacted brief and its filing date, followed by any public trial-court sealing/removal or final merits disposition. The present packet does not establish that such later records are absent.</p>\n<h2 id=\"comparison-with-the-retained-2023-appeal\">Comparison with the retained 2023 appeal</h2>\n<p>The earlier G060853 opinion reversed emergency TRO relief; the 2025 appeal affirmed denial of a different anti-SLAPP motion. Those outcomes answer different procedural questions. Neither acquired opinion establishes a final merits judgment, a completed MATCH correction/removal, or restored card processing.</p>\n<p>The useful new fact is that Merrick actually sought and failed to obtain this procedural protection for the listing, while the court preserved separate contract questions and ordered a narrower public record. The next records would distinguish a surviving claim from an exercised substantive remedy. No canonical case, existing evidence packet, reader or ZIP was changed.</p>",
        "path": "egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09/later-disposition.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-egumball2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquired and read 9 September 2026. Bounded lane closed after five focused discovery queries and full substantive judicial-text reading.\n\n## Source and version custody\n\nThe source is CaseMine's republication of G062863M.\n\nThe complete substantive web-reader body, lines95-388, was read across two overlapping calls and retained in later-opinion.reader.txt, with no gaps in that interval. The derivative preserves the modification and unmodified body separately. No underlying declarations, contract, docket, judicial PDF or sealed exhibits were acquired. Hashes and exact search scope are in later-captures.json. Root independently retained/read its own complete reader copy.\n\n**The correction matters:** May6 replaces the original page6 sentence with eGumball's assertion that all its processed 2020/2021 card transactions were directly connected to written client contracts (reader124-133, decisive127). The unmodified body at229 says the opposite. This remains eGumball's assertion, not an adjudicated reconciliation. Rehearing was denied, with no change in judgment.\n\n## What was actually decided\n\nMerrick Bank Corporation was the appellant. The court affirmed the denial of Merrick's special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute. The underlying action also named Paysafe Services (US), Corp. and Visa; those parties' ultimate liability was not adjudicated here. The earlier 2023 opinion used Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions, LLC: this packet does not silently merge those legal names.\n\nThe appeal applied de novo review. The two-step test first requires the defendant to establish claims arising from protected activity; only after that showing does the plaintiff need to demonstrate a probability of prevailing, described as minimal merit (printed p10; reader273-277). The actual affirmance rests on Merrick's failure to establish protected activity under the catchall public-interest provision425.16(e)(4). Conversion was outside the motion after Merrick conceded it did not arise from protected activity (fn3; reader243).\n\nThe court accepted a connection to the broad subject of credit-card security, but held that this specific confidential MATCH report did not contribute to public discussion. It considered the audience, purpose and context, not simply whether the topic affected many people (printed pp11-17; reader287-349). It expressly rejected a categorical rule excluding all confidential commercial speech from anti-SLAPP protection (reader347). Thus this is neither a ruling that private risk reports always lack protection nor a final determination that this report was false or unlawful.\n\nMerrick had separately argued forum selection, eGumball's contractual consent, truth and common-interest privilege (printed pp7-8; reader241-249). The decision does not establish that those defenses fail on the merits. eGumball's allegations about account restrictions, withheld funds, a fine, declined test cards and lost processing access are presented as complaint allegations (printed pp5-7; reader220-238), not findings of damages, laundering innocence or payment restoration.\n\n## Two concrete accountability mechanisms\n\nThe court expressly applied FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. (2019), involving confidential paid website reports tagged for adult content or copyright infringement. In this opinion, that earlier case supplies the legal comparison between commercial classification for advertisers and commercial risk reporting for acquirers (printed pp13-14; reader305-319). The comparison is significant for the investigation's structure: a privately distributed classifier does not obtain this procedural shield merely by invoking a public-interest subject. It establishes no common ownership, data feed or operational coordination between DoubleVerify and MATCH, and does not adjudicate the truth of FilmOn's challenged classifications. The named precedent remains an unacquired next-question candidate; no separate FilmOn inquiry was opened.\n\nThe court also described Merrick's typical merchant waiver/hold-harmless clause as a contractual means of preempting MATCH claims (printed p17; reader349-351). Its statement that Merrick had failed to secure such a release from eGumball is explicitly attributed to eGumball. This is evidence of a described contractual protection mechanism and disputed assent in this case, not a holding of universal enforceability or an acquired executed agreement.\n\nThe opinion's MATCH access, confidentiality, quarterly and per-inquiry fee descriptions belong to this historical litigation record. Footnote2 expressly uses the Mastercard Rules dated 9 February 2021, which Merrick cited; no amounts are given (printed pp3-5; reader195-215). These passages must not replace the independently acquired August2026 public rules or imply that this case established current prices.\n\n## The public-record remedy and exact missing filing\n\nThe court granted Merrick's appellate sealing motion without prejudice on its asserted proprietary/business interests. It likewise partly granted eGumball's motion without prejudice, but refused sealing of 28 specified documents because they were not subject to a trial-court sealing motion and no overriding interest had been explained. A trial referee was still considering overlapping sealing questions. The appellate order expressly disclaimed guidance to that proceeding and allowed a later unsealing application if the referee or trial court denied sealing (printed pp18-20; reader360-378).\n\nThe disposition required eGumball, within ten days of issuance of the opinion, to file an updated public redacted brief removing redactions that discussed or cited the 28 documents. Footnote5 identifies Meehan preliminary-injunction declaration exhibits1,3,4,16,17,21,23,24,25,26,29,30,47,48,49,51,52,54,55,56,57,58,61,63,64,65,66, plus exhibit11 to his declaration opposing the anti-SLAPP motion and supporting the preliminary injunction. This is an ordered public-access change, not evidence the revised filing was actually made or of what those exhibits contain. The parties bore their own appeal costs.\n\nTwo focused follow-up searches for this docket/brief and eGumball/Meehan/May2025 returned opinion republications and counsel publicity, but no revised brief or these exhibits. No account, docket challenge, sealed-document recovery or contact route was used. The precise frontier is the filed updated redacted brief and its filing date, followed by any public trial-court sealing/removal or final merits disposition. The present packet does not establish that such later records are absent.\n\n## Comparison with the retained 2023 appeal\n\nThe earlier G060853 opinion reversed emergency TRO relief; the 2025 appeal affirmed denial of a different anti-SLAPP motion. Those outcomes answer different procedural questions. Neither acquired opinion establishes a final merits judgment, a completed MATCH correction/removal, or restored card processing.\n\nThe useful new fact is that Merrick actually sought and failed to obtain this procedural protection for the listing, while the court preserved separate contract questions and ordered a narrower public record. The next records would distinguish a surviving claim from an exercised substantive remedy. No canonical case, existing evidence packet, reader or ZIP was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock",
        "title": "What could the operator's January 2025 legal claim refer to?",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded official-source legal-clock pass, now closed. This note does not determine this operator's compliance or identify an eSafety assurance.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded official-source legal-clock pass, now closed. This note does not determine this operator&#x27;s compliance or identify an eSafety assurance.</p>\n<p>The closest documented match is the <strong>Online Safety (Designated Internet Services—Class 1A and Class 1B Material) Industry Standard 2024</strong>, which commenced <strong>22 December 2024</strong>, rather than January 2025. Its contemporary announcement expressly discusses some generative-AI and nudification services. That makes it a strong candidate for the instrument being loosely described in the email; it does not establish that this was the operator&#x27;s intended reference. The separate RES standard has the same clock. The other concrete AI-related changes checked here commenced in May and September 2024.</p>\n<p>The source assertion is the respondent&#x27;s 25 December 2024 email, section 6, retained Tilak declaration Exhibit 6 PDF21: it says eSafety communicated specific requirements, the service complied, and was confirmed aligned with upcoming AI legislation effective January 2025. It is an interested participant&#x27;s account, with no instrument name or enclosed Australian assurance on that page. Local source: ../sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09/tilak-declaration-june13-2025.pdf; this pass read the existing PDF21 text extract, not the rest of the declaration afresh.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-matching-clock-and-its-limits\">The matching clock and its limits</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Instrument</th>\n<th>Making / registration</th>\n<th>Commencement</th>\n<th>Relevance and boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>DIS Class1A/1B Standard2024, F2024L00710</td>\n<td>Made19June2024 by Julie Inman Grant; Federal Register registration21June2024</td>\n<td>22December2024</td>\n<td>Closest substantive match: includes high-impact generative-AI services and model distribution platforms, with duties directed to specified seriously harmful classes.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>RES Class1A/1B Standard2024, F2024L00711</td>\n<td>Made19June2024 by Julie Inman Grant; Federal Register registration21June2024</td>\n<td>22December2024</td>\n<td>Companion instrument for relevant electronic services. Its date is a cross-check, not a service-classification finding.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BOSE Amendment Determination2024, F2024L00590</td>\n<td>Minister Michelle Rowland; registered30May2024</td>\n<td>31May2024</td>\n<td>Adds express generative-AI expectations. This is a different legal mechanism from the mandatory standard, and an earlier clock.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act2024, C2024A00078</td>\n<td>Assent and registration2September2024</td>\n<td>3September2024</td>\n<td>Criminal transmission offences covering altered/created sexual depictions; not a January service-approval regime.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Both standards&#x27; section2 says commencement is six months after the later of the day after registration under the Online Safety Act and the day after registration under the Legislation Act. Original covers/footers establish Federal Register registration; eSafety&#x27;s published guidance expressly confirms the resulting22December date. The contemporary21June announcement says both were registered that day and would come into force six months after registration, following the disallowance period. The22December date therefore comes from the regulator&#x27;s explicit account as well as the statutory formula, not an assumption that all registration events must be identical.</p>\n<p>Sources: [DIS original](http[local research file] [RES original](http[local research file] covers and PDF5/printed1, sections1–5; [eSafety21June2024 announcement](http[local research file] article body, reader lines212–237; [eSafety regulatory-guidance index](http[local research file] Online Safety Codes and Standards and Basic Online Safety Expectations sections (current page, last-updated26May2026).</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-dis-standard-actually-requires\">What the DIS standard actually requires</h2>\n<p>Section3 identifies section145 of the Online Safety Act2021 as authority. Section5 applies wherever a designated service is supplied from, only insofar as it serves end-users in Australia, and provides a predominant-purpose exception where another applicable code or standard better aligns with the service. The high-impact generative-AI definition in section6 turns on machine-learning generation capacity and synthetic high-impact material; it excludes a service with controls rendering that risk immaterial. For that category, high-impact material uses X18+/RC film or game and Category2-restricted/RC publication classifications. This is a category trigger, not a finding that every generated adult image breaches the standard. Section4&#x27;s protective object and the actual duties concern Class1A/1B material. Those classes include child sexual exploitation/pro-terror/extreme crime-and-violence material and specified other crime/violence/drug material. (Original PDF5–7 and12/printed1–3,8.)</p>\n<p>The June announcement specifically says the standards may cover apps generating pornography or nudifying images without effective controls preventing their application to children. That sentence supplies the concrete service-type connection to the operator&#x27;s description. It still does not classify or clear any named service.</p>\n<p>For a covered high-impact generative-AI DIS, section22(3) requires preventive systems for child-sexual-exploitation/pro-terror outputs; regular model testing/review and prompt mitigation adjustments; differentiation of AI outputs; warnings for Australian users specifically seeking child-abuse images; report/support information for relevant generation terms; and automated detection/action on child-abuse material in training data, prompts and outputs. The notes acknowledge limited model visibility/control and require reliance on available alternatives in those circumstances. PDF33–34/printed29–30, visually checked.</p>\n<p>The instrument also requires contractual provisions governing Class1A/1B use and giving suspension, restriction, termination or material-removal rights for child-exploitation/pro-terror misuse, plus appropriate enforcement in the circumstances specified by section13. Section19 requires management, supervision, internal reporting and sufficient skilled personnel. Section20 requires appropriate known-CSAM detection/removal, with express technical/practicability and encryption/systemic-weakness exceptions and alternative-action duties; it does not displace section22. These are scoped readings of sections13(2),13(5),19 and20, not a claim to have audited every applicable clause. Locators: PDF24–25/printed20–21; PDF30–31/printed26–27.</p>\n<p>Two timing qualifications matter. Section7&#x27;s ordinary first risk-assessment deadline can be six months after commencement, but section7(6)(f) expressly exempts high-impact generative-AI DIS from subsections(1) and(4), with a material-change qualification in the following page&#x27;s note. Do not mechanically assign that initial assessment deadline to every AI service. Section36(3) prevents a compliance-report request under that particular section before the first anniversary of commencement, and permits no more than one in12months; subsection(5) gives two months to respond. Those limits do not mean the standard&#x27;s substantive duties wait a year or that all other reporting powers are unavailable. Section38 requires compliance-action records to be kept for at least two years after the relevant calendar year&#x27;s end. PDF17–18,44–46/printed13–14,40–42.</p>\n<p>None of these readings establishes a general eSafety certification of an operator&#x27;s entire business, immunity under other laws, or satisfaction of the duties in practice.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-two-concrete-rival-clocks\">The two concrete rival clocks</h2>\n<p>The [BOSE amendment](http[local research file] section2 commenced the day after30May registration, hence31May2024. Schedule1 item7 inserts section8A: reasonable steps for end-user safety in design, implementation and maintenance of generative-AI capabilities, and proactively minimising their use for unlawful/harmful material or activity. Examples concern lifecycle risk assessment, training data and harmful prompts. Original PDF3,5–6/printed1,3–4. The expectation is broader in subject matter than the DIS harmful-material classes, but its enforcement form must be distinguished: Online Safety Act section45(4) says a determination under that section does not itself impose a duty enforceable by court proceedings. Part4 separately supplies reporting mechanisms. [Act compilation in force11December2024](http[local research file] sections44–45, scoped reader only.</p>\n<p>The current eSafety guidance index dates the BOSE guidance&#x27;s January2025 revision to the replacement of AAT by ART. A guidance revision date must not be relabelled legislative commencement. The available record does not establish that the respondent meant this update, or knew of it before the email.</p>\n<p>The [Deepfake Sexual Material Act](http[local research file] is another genuine2024 AI-adjacent change, but its section2 is explicit:3September2024. New Criminal Code section474.17A concerns using a carriage service to transmit specified sexual material of a person who is or appears18+, with knowledge of lack of consent or recklessness about consent. Altered or wholly technologically created depictions count; transmit includes making available, publication, distribution, advertising and promotion. There are specified exceptions. The creation/alteration aggravated offence under474.17AA(5) also requires the underlying transmission offence. This is not a blanket criminalisation of every act of making an image, and not a prospective eSafety approval system. Schedule1 item7 applies the amendments to material transmitted after commencement irrespective of when created/altered. PDF5–10,13/printed1–6,9.</p>\n<h2 id=\"provenance-gap-and-stopping-condition\">Provenance, gap and stopping condition</h2>\n<p>Four official original PDFs were obtained by ordinary public GET and preserved, with acquisition timestamps, finalURLs, bytes and SHA256 in legal-captures.json. Complete text extracts were generated for retrieval, but generation is not full-document reading. DIS read scope: original title, sections1–5, selected section6 definitions, section7, selected section8/9 material, sections10–12 table/overlap rules, selected13/14 clauses,19–20,22–23 thresholds,36–38; substantive pages were inspected through retained extraction and the public reader. Visual checks were PDF1,5,33,34. RES scope: cover and sections1–5 only; visualPDF5. BOSE: all8pages extracted text read; visualPDF3. Deepfake Act: PDF5–10,13 text; visualPDF6. Other rendered pages are not claimed as visual reads.</p>\n<p>DIS SHA256 afe30304b7094509de84a1845534b346a48c4fc2f2f07e163fd47fd040ce487d; RES75d2ce8834e804815dad8b72102bd61d4a2ec757b3edd336be541bfee0f3b8b9; BOSE39171722f9c258fa07d9e69324f781c0de000b358defc159fb492b2dfe5eae3a; Deepfake Act1ab54fc6a743c991d2db80aee8897206b10000933649364b77d53d6a40a60e1d.</p>\n<p>The June eSafety announcement and current guidance-index ordinary GETs timed out. Their public web-reader/indexed-primary passages were available and read; no original-HTML hash is asserted, and no transport retry was pursued. Act45 was a scoped public-reader read, not a retained original. This lane made no service-specific query or target-service visit. No January2025 commencement matching the asserted AI regime was located in this bounded pass; this is not an exhaustive negative over all Australian instruments.</p>\n<p>Carver&#x27;s separate service-specific lane has identified official ClothOff correspondence in FOILog141/request25202 that expressly invokes the22December2024 DIS commencement. That is a useful separately sourced counterpart for the clock; this lane has not independently reread that bundle and does not join ClothOff to Drawnudes or promote a request for further information into compliance confirmation.</p>\n<p>The next discriminator is the actual eSafety-to-respondent correspondence: dated requirement list, named legal basis/service classification, evidence supplied in reply, and exact wording/scope of any acknowledgement or assessment. Likely custodians are eSafety&#x27;s relevant industry-standards/compliance team and the operator; there is no outreach in this run. The forest implication is a credible sector-wide compliance mechanism with an unresolved operator-specific assertion, rather than proof of a January AI licensing regime or regulator-to-regulator coordination. Acquisition stops here for root&#x27;s combined review.</p>",
        "path": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09/legal-clock.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-dis-standard",
          "w25-sf-s-res-standard",
          "w25-sf-s-bose-amendment",
          "w25-sf-s-deepfake-act"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded official-source legal-clock pass, now closed. This note does not determine this operator's compliance or identify an eSafety assurance.\n\nThe closest documented match is the **Online Safety (Designated Internet Services—Class 1A and Class 1B Material) Industry Standard 2024**, which commenced **22 December 2024**, rather than January 2025. Its contemporary announcement expressly discusses some generative-AI and nudification services. That makes it a strong candidate for the instrument being loosely described in the email; it does not establish that this was the operator's intended reference. The separate RES standard has the same clock. The other concrete AI-related changes checked here commenced in May and September 2024.\n\nThe source assertion is the respondent's 25 December 2024 email, section 6, retained Tilak declaration Exhibit 6 PDF21: it says eSafety communicated specific requirements, the service complied, and was confirmed aligned with upcoming AI legislation effective January 2025. It is an interested participant's account, with no instrument name or enclosed Australian assurance on that page. Local source: ../sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09/tilak-declaration-june13-2025.pdf; this pass read the existing PDF21 text extract, not the rest of the declaration afresh.\n\n## The matching clock and its limits\n\n| Instrument | Making / registration | Commencement | Relevance and boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| DIS Class1A/1B Standard2024, F2024L00710 | Made19June2024 by Julie Inman Grant; Federal Register registration21June2024 | 22December2024 | Closest substantive match: includes high-impact generative-AI services and model distribution platforms, with duties directed to specified seriously harmful classes. |\n| RES Class1A/1B Standard2024, F2024L00711 | Made19June2024 by Julie Inman Grant; Federal Register registration21June2024 | 22December2024 | Companion instrument for relevant electronic services. Its date is a cross-check, not a service-classification finding. |\n| BOSE Amendment Determination2024, F2024L00590 | Minister Michelle Rowland; registered30May2024 | 31May2024 | Adds express generative-AI expectations. This is a different legal mechanism from the mandatory standard, and an earlier clock. |\n| Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act2024, C2024A00078 | Assent and registration2September2024 | 3September2024 | Criminal transmission offences covering altered/created sexual depictions; not a January service-approval regime. |\n\nBoth standards' section2 says commencement is six months after the later of the day after registration under the Online Safety Act and the day after registration under the Legislation Act. Original covers/footers establish Federal Register registration; eSafety's published guidance expressly confirms the resulting22December date. The contemporary21June announcement says both were registered that day and would come into force six months after registration, following the disallowance period. The22December date therefore comes from the regulator's explicit account as well as the statutory formula, not an assumption that all registration events must be identical.\n\nSources: DIS original (see source references) RES original (see source references) covers and PDF5/printed1, sections1–5; eSafety21June2024 announcement (see source references) article body, reader lines212–237; eSafety regulatory-guidance index (see source references) Online Safety Codes and Standards and Basic Online Safety Expectations sections (current page, last-updated26May2026).\n\n## What the DIS standard actually requires\n\nSection3 identifies section145 of the Online Safety Act2021 as authority. Section5 applies wherever a designated service is supplied from, only insofar as it serves end-users in Australia, and provides a predominant-purpose exception where another applicable code or standard better aligns with the service. The high-impact generative-AI definition in section6 turns on machine-learning generation capacity and synthetic high-impact material; it excludes a service with controls rendering that risk immaterial. For that category, high-impact material uses X18+/RC film or game and Category2-restricted/RC publication classifications. This is a category trigger, not a finding that every generated adult image breaches the standard. Section4's protective object and the actual duties concern Class1A/1B material. Those classes include child sexual exploitation/pro-terror/extreme crime-and-violence material and specified other crime/violence/drug material. (Original PDF5–7 and12/printed1–3,8.)\n\nThe June announcement specifically says the standards may cover apps generating pornography or nudifying images without effective controls preventing their application to children. That sentence supplies the concrete service-type connection to the operator's description. It still does not classify or clear any named service.\n\nFor a covered high-impact generative-AI DIS, section22(3) requires preventive systems for child-sexual-exploitation/pro-terror outputs; regular model testing/review and prompt mitigation adjustments; differentiation of AI outputs; warnings for Australian users specifically seeking child-abuse images; report/support information for relevant generation terms; and automated detection/action on child-abuse material in training data, prompts and outputs. The notes acknowledge limited model visibility/control and require reliance on available alternatives in those circumstances. PDF33–34/printed29–30, visually checked.\n\nThe instrument also requires contractual provisions governing Class1A/1B use and giving suspension, restriction, termination or material-removal rights for child-exploitation/pro-terror misuse, plus appropriate enforcement in the circumstances specified by section13. Section19 requires management, supervision, internal reporting and sufficient skilled personnel. Section20 requires appropriate known-CSAM detection/removal, with express technical/practicability and encryption/systemic-weakness exceptions and alternative-action duties; it does not displace section22. These are scoped readings of sections13(2),13(5),19 and20, not a claim to have audited every applicable clause. Locators: PDF24–25/printed20–21; PDF30–31/printed26–27.\n\nTwo timing qualifications matter. Section7's ordinary first risk-assessment deadline can be six months after commencement, but section7(6)(f) expressly exempts high-impact generative-AI DIS from subsections(1) and(4), with a material-change qualification in the following page's note. Do not mechanically assign that initial assessment deadline to every AI service. Section36(3) prevents a compliance-report request under that particular section before the first anniversary of commencement, and permits no more than one in12months; subsection(5) gives two months to respond. Those limits do not mean the standard's substantive duties wait a year or that all other reporting powers are unavailable. Section38 requires compliance-action records to be kept for at least two years after the relevant calendar year's end. PDF17–18,44–46/printed13–14,40–42.\n\nNone of these readings establishes a general eSafety certification of an operator's entire business, immunity under other laws, or satisfaction of the duties in practice.\n\n## The two concrete rival clocks\n\nThe BOSE amendment (see source references) section2 commenced the day after30May registration, hence31May2024. Schedule1 item7 inserts section8A: reasonable steps for end-user safety in design, implementation and maintenance of generative-AI capabilities, and proactively minimising their use for unlawful/harmful material or activity. Examples concern lifecycle risk assessment, training data and harmful prompts. Original PDF3,5–6/printed1,3–4. The expectation is broader in subject matter than the DIS harmful-material classes, but its enforcement form must be distinguished: Online Safety Act section45(4) says a determination under that section does not itself impose a duty enforceable by court proceedings. Part4 separately supplies reporting mechanisms. Act compilation in force11December2024 (see source references) sections44–45, scoped reader only.\n\nThe current eSafety guidance index dates the BOSE guidance's January2025 revision to the replacement of AAT by ART. A guidance revision date must not be relabelled legislative commencement. The available record does not establish that the respondent meant this update, or knew of it before the email.\n\nThe Deepfake Sexual Material Act (see source references) is another genuine2024 AI-adjacent change, but its section2 is explicit:3September2024. New Criminal Code section474.17A concerns using a carriage service to transmit specified sexual material of a person who is or appears18+, with knowledge of lack of consent or recklessness about consent. Altered or wholly technologically created depictions count; transmit includes making available, publication, distribution, advertising and promotion. There are specified exceptions. The creation/alteration aggravated offence under474.17AA(5) also requires the underlying transmission offence. This is not a blanket criminalisation of every act of making an image, and not a prospective eSafety approval system. Schedule1 item7 applies the amendments to material transmitted after commencement irrespective of when created/altered. PDF5–10,13/printed1–6,9.\n\n## Provenance, gap and stopping condition\n\nFour official original PDFs were obtained by ordinary public GET and preserved, with acquisition timestamps, finalURLs, bytes and SHA256 in legal-captures.json. Complete text extracts were generated for retrieval, but generation is not full-document reading. DIS read scope: original title, sections1–5, selected section6 definitions, section7, selected section8/9 material, sections10–12 table/overlap rules, selected13/14 clauses,19–20,22–23 thresholds,36–38; substantive pages were inspected through retained extraction and the public reader. Visual checks were PDF1,5,33,34. RES scope: cover and sections1–5 only; visualPDF5. BOSE: all8pages extracted text read; visualPDF3. Deepfake Act: PDF5–10,13 text; visualPDF6. Other rendered pages are not claimed as visual reads.\n\nDIS SHA256 afe30304b7094509de84a1845534b346a48c4fc2f2f07e163fd47fd040ce487d; RES75d2ce8834e804815dad8b72102bd61d4a2ec757b3edd336be541bfee0f3b8b9; BOSE39171722f9c258fa07d9e69324f781c0de000b358defc159fb492b2dfe5eae3a; Deepfake Act1ab54fc6a743c991d2db80aee8897206b10000933649364b77d53d6a40a60e1d.\n\nThe June eSafety announcement and current guidance-index ordinary GETs timed out. Their public web-reader/indexed-primary passages were available and read; no original-HTML hash is asserted, and no transport retry was pursued. Act45 was a scoped public-reader read, not a retained original. This lane made no service-specific query or target-service visit. No January2025 commencement matching the asserted AI regime was located in this bounded pass; this is not an exhaustive negative over all Australian instruments.\n\nCarver's separate service-specific lane has identified official ClothOff correspondence in FOILog141/request25202 that expressly invokes the22December2024 DIS commencement. That is a useful separately sourced counterpart for the clock; this lane has not independently reread that bundle and does not join ClothOff to Drawnudes or promote a request for further information into compliance confirmation.\n\nThe next discriminator is the actual eSafety-to-respondent correspondence: dated requirement list, named legal basis/service classification, evidence supplied in reply, and exact wording/scope of any acknowledgement or assessment. Likely custodians are eSafety's relevant industry-standards/compliance team and the operator; there is no outreach in this run. The forest implication is a credible sector-wide compliance mechanism with an unresolved operator-specific assertion, rather than proof of a January AI licensing regime or regulator-to-regulator coordination. Acquisition stops here for root's combined review.\n",
        "file": "research/esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-legal-clock.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention",
        "title": "eSafety and drawnudes.io: service-specific intervention check",
        "description": "Research observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded public-record result, not a determination of the service's compliance. No service website was visited, tested or contacted.",
        "html": "<p>Research observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded public-record result, not a determination of the service&#x27;s compliance. No service website was visited, tested or contacted.</p>\n<p>The inspected official material does not verify that eSafety imposed a service-specific requirement on drawnudes.io before 25 December 2024, or that it approved or confirmed that service&#x27;s compliance. It does establish contemporaneous outreach to a different named provider, ClothOff. The exact missing record is the eSafety-to-operator correspondence and any subsequent assessment or confirmation naming drawnudes.io (or a legally identified operator demonstrably responsible for it).</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-operator-actually-claimed\">What the operator actually claimed</h2>\n<p>The already retained Tilak declaration, Exhibit 6, PDF pages 19–22, reproduces a 25 December 2024 email from a correspondent signing as Ali. Section 6, PDF 21, claims eSafety recently contacted the service, supplied specific requirements, and confirmed alignment with forthcoming January 2025 AI legislation after the operator complied. The 4 January 2025 follow-up, PDF 19, repeats that an Australian regulator provided a list of requirements which the operator fulfilled. The city attorney&#x27;s 3 January reply, also PDF 19, says the office understands the correspondent operates drawnudes.io and asks whether the described policies apply to other sites. Those are attribution and scope facts, not agency verification. The exhibit contains no attached Australian notice or confirmation.</p>\n<p>Source: Karun Tilak declaration, filed court material independently republished at http[local research file] . Local original: ../sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09/tilak-declaration-june13-2025.pdf . SHA-256 bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5. This lane read retained text for PDF 19–22; it did not redownload the document or review all 61 pages. Parent owns the broader declaration analysis.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-closest-official-correspondence-record\">The closest official correspondence record</h2>\n<p>The [eSafety disclosure log](http[local research file] Log 141 / request 25202, lists a release on 5 December 2025 concerning correspondence with two nudify providers. It says three documents were released fully and three partly, with redactions under FOI sections 22, 47E(d), 47F. That description does not identify the second provider.</p>\n<p>The linked [23-page document set](http[local research file] supplies a concrete comparator. Document 2, PDF 3–7, records eSafety&#x27;s 3 October 2024 outreach to ClothOff, recommending consideration of whether the DIS Standard applies and outlining potential policies, reporting and output-prevention duties. Its 11 November reply says ClothOff is likely covered, with commencement on 22 December 2024. On 5 December, ClothOff claims changes; eSafety points to guidance and asks about those changes. Document 3, PDF 8–13, contains an 8 January 2025 follow-up asking for details and explaining the initial enforcement discretion. It is not a compliance certificate. Document 5, PDF 18–19, is a 23 June 2025 general circular, expressly disavowing any necessary service-specific compliance concern from receipt alone. None of the inspected readable substantive messages names drawnudes.io. This correspondence supports an outreach mechanism, not a transfer of ClothOff&#x27;s identity or regulatory status to Drawnudes.</p>\n<p>Reading scope: PDF 1–13 substantive correspondence, PDF 14 delivery-failure explanation, PDF 18–20 substantive circular and delivery-failure explanation; remaining technical message headers were not audited. Whole web-reader text was searched for “draw” with no match. Redacted or absent recipient fields were not reconstructed. No claim is made that this is the full agency file or that every recipient of generic circulars has been identified.</p>\n<h2 id=\"later-enforcement-cannot-silently-supply-the-missing-identity-or-date\">Later enforcement cannot silently supply the missing identity or date</h2>\n<p>[eSafety&#x27;s 8 September 2025 announcement](http[local research file] main text beginning with the date through the media-contact heading, says it formally warned an unnamed UK company operating two services for failing to prevent child sexual exploitation material. It expressly withholds the company name to avoid promotion. This is an agency account of later enforcement, not evidence of a December 2024 requirement or a named Drawnudes action.</p>\n<p>[The 27 November 2025 follow-up](http[local research file] main text through the media-contact heading, reports withdrawal of Australian access to three services after September enforcement. Its accompanying Hugging Face account concerns a different intermediary. Neither account identifies Drawnudes or independently establishes the operator&#x27;s earlier claimed approval.</p>\n<p>[The 20 May 2026 announcement](http[local research file] main text through the media-contact heading, describes a direction to comply within 14 days to an unnamed Argentina-based provider under March 2026 age-restricted-material codes. It again explicitly withholds the name. Its later report that the earlier three services relaunched under a new owner is not an identification bridge. No unnamed provider is assigned to drawnudes.io by this packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"search-and-custody-limits\">Search and custody limits</h2>\n<p>Ten search queries are retained in service-query-log.json. Exact service/name variants restricted to esafety.gov.au and aph.gov.au yielded no service-specific official result. Broader nudify/enforcement queries led to the official media-release lists and disclosure log. The lists were discovery surfaces, not an exhaustive reviewed enforcement register. No parliamentary full-corpus review, every-year annual-report audit, or all-notices inspection was performed. An unindexed, unpublished, redacted, or differently named record could exist.</p>\n<p>Ordinary Python requests GETs to the Log 141 PDF and disclosure page each timed out after 35 seconds. The already successful official web reader was the usable substitute; no original bytes or original SHA-256 were acquired for these records. Neither ordinary route was retried. A bounded visual check requested PDF 3, 8, 18 through web screenshot. PDF 3 and 18 returned “Failed to fetch ... Cache miss”; PDF 8 returned a reference without a visible image. No successful visual inspection is claimed and there was no recovery attempt. Findings rest on the readable official text. service-reader-scope.md is a derived scope/locator record, not a facsimile or original capture; its hash is identified separately in service-captures.json.</p>\n<h2 id=\"decision-boundary-and-candidate-relations\">Decision boundary and candidate relations</h2>\n<p>The defensible relation is <strong>Ali, as reproduced in a filed exhibit, claims prior eSafety contact and compliance confirmation concerning the described service</strong>. A second, independently supported relation is <strong>eSafety sent ClothOff regulatory guidance and requests for information about claimed changes in 2024–25</strong>. They remain separate records. No edge saying eSafety approved Drawnudes, certified its safeguards, endorsed the business, imposed a particular remedy on it, or confirmed compliance is warranted.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival explanation is that the operator received ordinary preparatory guidance similar to the released ClothOff correspondence and characterized it as confirmation. Another possibility is a distinct unpublished exchange with a stronger conclusion. The record here discriminates neither. The actual dated outgoing notice/guidance, the operator&#x27;s response, and eSafety&#x27;s subsequent assessment are the next useful records; their likely custodians are eSafety and the operator/counsel. This is an identified record gap, not authorization for outreach or a new acquisition branch.</p>\n<p>Forest implication: regulatory contact, legal obligation, claimed implementation, agency assessment and actual approval are different stages. This pass verifies the mechanism for another provider while leaving the service-specific claim unresolved. Hubble&#x27;s separate legal-instrument packet tests the January 2025 date; it should not be used to backfill an unverified service-level decision.</p>",
        "path": "esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09/service-intervention.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-foi-log",
          "w25-sf-s-foi141",
          "w25-sf-s-esafety-september",
          "w25-sf-s-esafety-november",
          "w25-sf-s-esafety-may"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded public-record result, not a determination of the service's compliance. No service website was visited, tested or contacted.\n\nThe inspected official material does not verify that eSafety imposed a service-specific requirement on drawnudes.io before 25 December 2024, or that it approved or confirmed that service's compliance. It does establish contemporaneous outreach to a different named provider, ClothOff. The exact missing record is the eSafety-to-operator correspondence and any subsequent assessment or confirmation naming drawnudes.io (or a legally identified operator demonstrably responsible for it).\n\n## What the operator actually claimed\n\nThe already retained Tilak declaration, Exhibit 6, PDF pages 19–22, reproduces a 25 December 2024 email from a correspondent signing as Ali. Section 6, PDF 21, claims eSafety recently contacted the service, supplied specific requirements, and confirmed alignment with forthcoming January 2025 AI legislation after the operator complied. The 4 January 2025 follow-up, PDF 19, repeats that an Australian regulator provided a list of requirements which the operator fulfilled. The city attorney's 3 January reply, also PDF 19, says the office understands the correspondent operates drawnudes.io and asks whether the described policies apply to other sites. Those are attribution and scope facts, not agency verification. The exhibit contains no attached Australian notice or confirmation.\n\nSource: Karun Tilak declaration, filed court material independently republished at http[local research file] . Local original: ../sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09/tilak-declaration-june13-2025.pdf . SHA-256 bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5. This lane read retained text for PDF 19–22; it did not redownload the document or review all 61 pages. Parent owns the broader declaration analysis.\n\n## The closest official correspondence record\n\nThe eSafety disclosure log (see source references) Log 141 / request 25202, lists a release on 5 December 2025 concerning correspondence with two nudify providers. It says three documents were released fully and three partly, with redactions under FOI sections 22, 47E(d), 47F. That description does not identify the second provider.\n\nThe linked 23-page document set (see source references) supplies a concrete comparator. Document 2, PDF 3–7, records eSafety's 3 October 2024 outreach to ClothOff, recommending consideration of whether the DIS Standard applies and outlining potential policies, reporting and output-prevention duties. Its 11 November reply says ClothOff is likely covered, with commencement on 22 December 2024. On 5 December, ClothOff claims changes; eSafety points to guidance and asks about those changes. Document 3, PDF 8–13, contains an 8 January 2025 follow-up asking for details and explaining the initial enforcement discretion. It is not a compliance certificate. Document 5, PDF 18–19, is a 23 June 2025 general circular, expressly disavowing any necessary service-specific compliance concern from receipt alone. None of the inspected readable substantive messages names drawnudes.io. This correspondence supports an outreach mechanism, not a transfer of ClothOff's identity or regulatory status to Drawnudes.\n\nReading scope: PDF 1–13 substantive correspondence, PDF 14 delivery-failure explanation, PDF 18–20 substantive circular and delivery-failure explanation; remaining technical message headers were not audited. Whole web-reader text was searched for “draw” with no match. Redacted or absent recipient fields were not reconstructed. No claim is made that this is the full agency file or that every recipient of generic circulars has been identified.\n\n## Later enforcement cannot silently supply the missing identity or date\n\neSafety's 8 September 2025 announcement (see source references) main text beginning with the date through the media-contact heading, says it formally warned an unnamed UK company operating two services for failing to prevent child sexual exploitation material. It expressly withholds the company name to avoid promotion. This is an agency account of later enforcement, not evidence of a December 2024 requirement or a named Drawnudes action.\n\nThe 27 November 2025 follow-up (see source references) main text through the media-contact heading, reports withdrawal of Australian access to three services after September enforcement. Its accompanying Hugging Face account concerns a different intermediary. Neither account identifies Drawnudes or independently establishes the operator's earlier claimed approval.\n\nThe 20 May 2026 announcement (see source references) main text through the media-contact heading, describes a direction to comply within 14 days to an unnamed Argentina-based provider under March 2026 age-restricted-material codes. It again explicitly withholds the name. Its later report that the earlier three services relaunched under a new owner is not an identification bridge. No unnamed provider is assigned to drawnudes.io by this packet.\n\n## Search and custody limits\n\nTen search queries are retained in service-query-log.json. Exact service/name variants restricted to esafety.gov.au and aph.gov.au yielded no service-specific official result. Broader nudify/enforcement queries led to the official media-release lists and disclosure log. The lists were discovery surfaces, not an exhaustive reviewed enforcement register. No parliamentary full-corpus review, every-year annual-report audit, or all-notices inspection was performed. An unindexed, unpublished, redacted, or differently named record could exist.\n\nOrdinary Python requests GETs to the Log 141 PDF and disclosure page each timed out after 35 seconds. The already successful official web reader was the usable substitute; no original bytes or original SHA-256 were acquired for these records. Neither ordinary route was retried. A bounded visual check requested PDF 3, 8, 18 through web screenshot. PDF 3 and 18 returned “Failed to fetch ... Cache miss”; PDF 8 returned a reference without a visible image. No successful visual inspection is claimed and there was no recovery attempt. Findings rest on the readable official text. service-reader-scope.md is a derived scope/locator record, not a facsimile or original capture; its hash is identified separately in service-captures.json.\n\n## Decision boundary and candidate relations\n\nThe defensible relation is **Ali, as reproduced in a filed exhibit, claims prior eSafety contact and compliance confirmation concerning the described service**. A second, independently supported relation is **eSafety sent ClothOff regulatory guidance and requests for information about claimed changes in 2024–25**. They remain separate records. No edge saying eSafety approved Drawnudes, certified its safeguards, endorsed the business, imposed a particular remedy on it, or confirmed compliance is warranted.\n\nThe strongest rival explanation is that the operator received ordinary preparatory guidance similar to the released ClothOff correspondence and characterized it as confirmation. Another possibility is a distinct unpublished exchange with a stronger conclusion. The record here discriminates neither. The actual dated outgoing notice/guidance, the operator's response, and eSafety's subsequent assessment are the next useful records; their likely custodians are eSafety and the operator/counsel. This is an identified record gap, not authorization for outreach or a new acquisition branch.\n\nForest implication: regulatory contact, legal obligation, claimed implementation, agency assessment and actual approval are different stages. This pass verifies the mechanism for another provider while leaving the service-specific claim unresolved. Hubble's separate legal-instrument packet tests the January 2025 date; it should not be used to backfill an unverified service-level decision.\n",
        "file": "research/esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09-service-intervention.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance",
        "title": "CDDP evaluation, acceptance and continuation of funding",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root's bounded acquisition after the supplier-platform forest. No final evaluation output was located in the scoped public search. Requirements, announced funding, unpublished deliverables, disclosed copies and observed performance remain separate.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root&#x27;s bounded acquisition after the supplier-platform forest. No final evaluation output was located in the scoped public search. Requirements, announced funding, unpublished deliverables, disclosed copies and observed performance remain separate.</p>\n<h2 id=\"read-scope-and-custody\">Read scope and custody</h2>\n<p>Primary retained original: ../supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09/cddp-foi-bundle.pdf, SHA256 71bd6a522a765d53f9aa79b239134226be64891ea3c67711abc9d788fb87748f. Source: http[local research file] . This run read PDF pages 18,34–35,62–68,88–100 and visually inspected pages 18,63,93,95,97,100,193–194. Local PNGs are derivatives of that original. Page18 is almost fully redacted; no hidden text was reconstructed. The prior run read the contract/IP pages separately.</p>\n<p>Official release: http[local research file] . This run read the complete exemption account, not only its document inventory. The public page contains an unreconciled date discrepancy: publication 28 June 2024, request 25 August 2023, response field 25 September 2024. Original bundle filename contains FOI2023 while release path/reference says FOI2024. Preserve those labels without silently fixing the response year.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-government-wanted-evaluated\">What the government wanted evaluated</h2>\n<p>The October 2021 business case, PDF62–68 (printed61–67), envisages process and impact evaluation, consultation with an independent evaluator and HMT, and sharing supporting evidence with Treasury teams. Process evaluation would examine cross-government coordination and working practices, with KPIs developed after an initial systems audit. Impact evaluation would assess whether improved data products enhanced government understanding and operational response. Specific criteria were still to be agreed. Publicly legible criteria concern funded delivery, government data sharing/analysis, stakeholder benefit and lessons. Detailed portions of both evaluation strands are visibly redacted; absence of a readable accuracy, rights or false-positive metric is not proof that no such metric was used.</p>\n<p>The expert-evaluator specification, contract 102384, PDF88–92, asks for independent end-to-end monitoring, value-for-money assessment, assessment of digital practice and the effectiveness of correctly identifying misinformation/disinformation trends. This correctness requirement matters: the available specification is not limited to efficiency. The contract also requires reporting that senior civil servants across Whitehall can use, with successes, failures and long-term recommendations. A final report is an expressly commissioned deliverable. Experimental or quasi-experimental evaluation is conditional; interest in possible A/B testing is not evidence an experiment was conducted, let alone a population manipulation experiment.</p>\n<p>The provisional schedule contains a feasibility report to HMT in February 2022, a phase-two decision in March 2022, interim evaluation in August 2022 and final evaluation gateway in February 2023 before phase end in March 2023. Earlier rows carry apparent year inconsistencies (November–February 2021 and December/January 2021); these remain as printed. PDF92 expressly makes subsequent-phase funding conditional on assessment of the discovery feasibility review and approval by HMT officials. This locates an intended funding gate. It does not identify the actual official, decision minute, evidence considered or whether the gate was exercised as planned.</p>\n<p>The internal DCMS team administers contracts, supplies governance secretariat and leads cross-government engagement. The separately contracted digital project-management team leads discovery/delivery, while the evaluator examines it. These are specified roles, not names of the actual committee members. PDF62 and68 direct evaluation evidence and financial/performance information toward the Shared Outcomes Fund team, HMT spending team and other government departments.</p>\n<h2 id=\"evaluator-identity-price-and-copy-limitations\">Evaluator identity, price and copy limitations</h2>\n<p>The release inventory identifies document6 as the DCMS/Oliver Wyman evaluation-and-monitoring contract. PDF95 is order102384, but the supplier name, address and registration number are visibly redacted; the brand identification comes from the department&#x27;s inventory, not a recovered supplier field. Exact legal-entity registration remains unresolved. No related corporate ownership claim is made.</p>\n<p>PDF93&#x27;s pricing table is visible in the rendered page despite failing text extraction: Phase I GBP108,400 excluding VAT; Phase II GBP547,600; total fixed tender price GBP656,000 excluding VAT. The same GBP656,000 appears in PDF97 as the estimated first-year charges used for liability calculation. Payment is in arrears after relevant deliverables satisfy DCMS. This is a disclosed contractual/tender price, not proof of payment. Tables B and C below contain blacked-out fields despite the inventory calling the pricing document disclosed; do not say all prices or rate cards were disclosed.</p>\n<p>The order is dated 14 January 2022 (PDF96), while PDF97 visibly prints a 20 December 2022 start, three-month initial period and 31 March 2023 expiry, alongside a phase-one extension reservation. Those terms differ from the specification&#x27;s December2021-to-March2023 project schedule. A clerical mistake, later amendment or different phase might explain the difference; none is established. PDF100 signature/name/role/date fields are visibly empty. The released copy does not independently establish execution, and it does not prove no executed contract exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-remains-hidden-about-acceptance\">What remains hidden about acceptance</h2>\n<p>PDF193–194 visibly redact the table of programme outputs/success measures and detailed milestone descriptions/acceptance criteria. The dates 15 July 2022 and 30 September 2022 remain visible. This confirms that the missing substantive cells are redactions, not merely an OCR failure. Conversely PDF93 demonstrates why failed text extraction alone must not be called redaction. The contract variation&#x27;s reported MVP completion is stronger than a plan, but still not an independent assessment of accuracy, fairness, effectiveness or downstream platform action.</p>\n<p>The department&#x27;s release account applies personal-data, commercial, policy-development, security and public-affairs exemptions to specified parts. It says section36 was applied across every document except the pricing schedule and defends withholding operational capabilities/vulnerabilities. Discovery Report and Product Operating Model are withheld in full under the described security/public-affairs basis after removal would make the remainder illegible. These are the department&#x27;s reasons; no ICO or tribunal review of this particular release was acquired. The earlier ICO Crisp-report ruling is a different record and does not adjudicate these CDDP redactions. Neither-confirm-nor-deny wording concerning additional security-related records proves neither their existence nor absence.</p>\n<h2 id=\"published-programme-scale-and-named-participants\">Published programme scale and named participants</h2>\n<p>A separate Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 summary publicly lists CDDP funding of GBP8.4 million and participants DCMS, FCDO, Home Office, Cabinet Office, Ministry of Defence, GCHQ and NCSC. This is announced pilot funding and participation, not a ledger of money received by Faculty or Oliver Wyman, nor proof every participant supplied intelligence data or controlled the platform. Do not add its GBP8.4m to supplier prices, which may be components or differently scoped amounts.</p>\n<p>Retained original shared-outcomes-round2.pdf: 230,526 bytes, SHA256 c91b2c59cfcafc70bb10f4aab856d4d15c92166957f587599d47a94a671598bc. Read PDF9/printed6, CDDP entry. Source: http[local research file] . Public reader failed once; ordinary direct download succeeded. Do not confuse adjacent Global Supply Chain Intelligence Pilot and its GBP4.7m entry with CDDP.</p>\n<h2 id=\"search-result-and-highest-value-next-records\">Search result and highest-value next records</h2>\n<p>Scoped exact-title searches combined CDDP, final report, evaluation, Oliver Wyman and contract102384 across government/parliament/supplier sources. They returned the original commissioning material but no actual final evaluation, agreed KPI set, Treasury gate decision, or completed acceptance certificate. This is an acquisition gap, not evidence that evaluation never occurred or was adverse. No new request was sent.</p>\n<p>Most revealing likely records are the initial audit/KPI agreement; discovery feasibility report sent to HMT and funding decision; interim/final evaluation report and its supporting evidence; milestone acceptance record; and the log translating analyst findings into subsequent action. Commissioned documents have firmer existence support than guessed internal communications; delivered versions remain unconfirmed.</p>\n<p>A separate official source surfaced: the Online Safety Data Initiative (OSDI) appointed PA Consulting to evaluate a Faculty/PUBLIC delivery consortium. OSDI is not CDDP, its evaluator is not Oliver Wyman, and its results cannot stand in for CDDP&#x27;s. It offers a useful next comparison: how the same public funding model and overlapping suppliers handle classification, independent assessment and publication in a less opaque project. Source lead: http[local research file] . Only its indexed official opening was read in this run; further acquisition follows a forest review.</p>",
        "path": "evaluation-wave-2026-09-09/evaluation-and-acceptance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-foi-release",
          "w16-supp-s-foi-bundle",
          "w33-con-s-round2"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root's bounded acquisition after the supplier-platform forest. No final evaluation output was located in the scoped public search. Requirements, announced funding, unpublished deliverables, disclosed copies and observed performance remain separate.\n\n## Read scope and custody\n\nPrimary retained original: ../supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09/cddp-foi-bundle.pdf, SHA256 71bd6a522a765d53f9aa79b239134226be64891ea3c67711abc9d788fb87748f. Source: http[local research file] . This run read PDF pages 18,34–35,62–68,88–100 and visually inspected pages 18,63,93,95,97,100,193–194. Local PNGs are derivatives of that original. Page18 is almost fully redacted; no hidden text was reconstructed. The prior run read the contract/IP pages separately.\n\nOfficial release: http[local research file] . This run read the complete exemption account, not only its document inventory. The public page contains an unreconciled date discrepancy: publication 28 June 2024, request 25 August 2023, response field 25 September 2024. Original bundle filename contains FOI2023 while release path/reference says FOI2024. Preserve those labels without silently fixing the response year.\n\n## What the government wanted evaluated\n\nThe October 2021 business case, PDF62–68 (printed61–67), envisages process and impact evaluation, consultation with an independent evaluator and HMT, and sharing supporting evidence with Treasury teams. Process evaluation would examine cross-government coordination and working practices, with KPIs developed after an initial systems audit. Impact evaluation would assess whether improved data products enhanced government understanding and operational response. Specific criteria were still to be agreed. Publicly legible criteria concern funded delivery, government data sharing/analysis, stakeholder benefit and lessons. Detailed portions of both evaluation strands are visibly redacted; absence of a readable accuracy, rights or false-positive metric is not proof that no such metric was used.\n\nThe expert-evaluator specification, contract 102384, PDF88–92, asks for independent end-to-end monitoring, value-for-money assessment, assessment of digital practice and the effectiveness of correctly identifying misinformation/disinformation trends. This correctness requirement matters: the available specification is not limited to efficiency. The contract also requires reporting that senior civil servants across Whitehall can use, with successes, failures and long-term recommendations. A final report is an expressly commissioned deliverable. Experimental or quasi-experimental evaluation is conditional; interest in possible A/B testing is not evidence an experiment was conducted, let alone a population manipulation experiment.\n\nThe provisional schedule contains a feasibility report to HMT in February 2022, a phase-two decision in March 2022, interim evaluation in August 2022 and final evaluation gateway in February 2023 before phase end in March 2023. Earlier rows carry apparent year inconsistencies (November–February 2021 and December/January 2021); these remain as printed. PDF92 expressly makes subsequent-phase funding conditional on assessment of the discovery feasibility review and approval by HMT officials. This locates an intended funding gate. It does not identify the actual official, decision minute, evidence considered or whether the gate was exercised as planned.\n\nThe internal DCMS team administers contracts, supplies governance secretariat and leads cross-government engagement. The separately contracted digital project-management team leads discovery/delivery, while the evaluator examines it. These are specified roles, not names of the actual committee members. PDF62 and68 direct evaluation evidence and financial/performance information toward the Shared Outcomes Fund team, HMT spending team and other government departments.\n\n## Evaluator identity, price and copy limitations\n\nThe release inventory identifies document6 as the DCMS/Oliver Wyman evaluation-and-monitoring contract. PDF95 is order102384, but the supplier name, address and registration number are visibly redacted; the brand identification comes from the department's inventory, not a recovered supplier field. Exact legal-entity registration remains unresolved. No related corporate ownership claim is made.\n\nPDF93's pricing table is visible in the rendered page despite failing text extraction: Phase I GBP108,400 excluding VAT; Phase II GBP547,600; total fixed tender price GBP656,000 excluding VAT. The same GBP656,000 appears in PDF97 as the estimated first-year charges used for liability calculation. Payment is in arrears after relevant deliverables satisfy DCMS. This is a disclosed contractual/tender price, not proof of payment. Tables B and C below contain blacked-out fields despite the inventory calling the pricing document disclosed; do not say all prices or rate cards were disclosed.\n\nThe order is dated 14 January 2022 (PDF96), while PDF97 visibly prints a 20 December 2022 start, three-month initial period and 31 March 2023 expiry, alongside a phase-one extension reservation. Those terms differ from the specification's December2021-to-March2023 project schedule. A clerical mistake, later amendment or different phase might explain the difference; none is established. PDF100 signature/name/role/date fields are visibly empty. The released copy does not independently establish execution, and it does not prove no executed contract exists.\n\n## What remains hidden about acceptance\n\nPDF193–194 visibly redact the table of programme outputs/success measures and detailed milestone descriptions/acceptance criteria. The dates 15 July 2022 and 30 September 2022 remain visible. This confirms that the missing substantive cells are redactions, not merely an OCR failure. Conversely PDF93 demonstrates why failed text extraction alone must not be called redaction. The contract variation's reported MVP completion is stronger than a plan, but still not an independent assessment of accuracy, fairness, effectiveness or downstream platform action.\n\nThe department's release account applies personal-data, commercial, policy-development, security and public-affairs exemptions to specified parts. It says section36 was applied across every document except the pricing schedule and defends withholding operational capabilities/vulnerabilities. Discovery Report and Product Operating Model are withheld in full under the described security/public-affairs basis after removal would make the remainder illegible. These are the department's reasons; no ICO or tribunal review of this particular release was acquired. The earlier ICO Crisp-report ruling is a different record and does not adjudicate these CDDP redactions. Neither-confirm-nor-deny wording concerning additional security-related records proves neither their existence nor absence.\n\n## Published programme scale and named participants\n\nA separate Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 summary publicly lists CDDP funding of GBP8.4 million and participants DCMS, FCDO, Home Office, Cabinet Office, Ministry of Defence, GCHQ and NCSC. This is announced pilot funding and participation, not a ledger of money received by Faculty or Oliver Wyman, nor proof every participant supplied intelligence data or controlled the platform. Do not add its GBP8.4m to supplier prices, which may be components or differently scoped amounts.\n\nRetained original shared-outcomes-round2.pdf: 230,526 bytes, SHA256 c91b2c59cfcafc70bb10f4aab856d4d15c92166957f587599d47a94a671598bc. Read PDF9/printed6, CDDP entry. Source: http[local research file] . Public reader failed once; ordinary direct download succeeded. Do not confuse adjacent Global Supply Chain Intelligence Pilot and its GBP4.7m entry with CDDP.\n\n## Search result and highest-value next records\n\nScoped exact-title searches combined CDDP, final report, evaluation, Oliver Wyman and contract102384 across government/parliament/supplier sources. They returned the original commissioning material but no actual final evaluation, agreed KPI set, Treasury gate decision, or completed acceptance certificate. This is an acquisition gap, not evidence that evaluation never occurred or was adverse. No new request was sent.\n\nMost revealing likely records are the initial audit/KPI agreement; discovery feasibility report sent to HMT and funding decision; interim/final evaluation report and its supporting evidence; milestone acceptance record; and the log translating analyst findings into subsequent action. Commissioned documents have firmer existence support than guessed internal communications; delivered versions remain unconfirmed.\n\nA separate official source surfaced: the Online Safety Data Initiative (OSDI) appointed PA Consulting to evaluate a Faculty/PUBLIC delivery consortium. OSDI is not CDDP, its evaluator is not Oliver Wyman, and its results cannot stand in for CDDP's. It offers a useful next comparison: how the same public funding model and overlapping suppliers handle classification, independent assessment and publication in a less opaque project. Source lead: http[local research file] . Only its indexed official opening was read in this run; further acquisition follows a forest review.\n",
        "file": "research/evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product",
        "title": "DoubleVerify: customer choice, vendor defaults and review",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition is closed. Four original company HTML pages were and their full substantive text read. A current SEC-hosted FY2025 filing was read in specific passages through the primary web reader; no original filing was downloaded. These are company descriptions, not a customer configuration, independent accuracy audit or observed resto",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root acquisition is closed. Four original company HTML pages were retained and their full substantive text read. A current SEC-hosted FY2025 filing was read in specific passages through the primary web reader; no original filing was downloaded. These are company descriptions, not a customer configuration, independent accuracy audit or observed restoration. The historical FilmOn case is a separate lane. Current brand/product statements and consolidated issuer disclosures do not by themselves prove the exact contracting entity in the older lawsuit.</p>\n<h2 id=\"category-assignment-and-customer-selection\">Category assignment and customer selection</h2>\n<p>The undated current [brand-suitability product page](http[local research file] describes a proprietary classifier using AI and human review across several media types. It supplies more than100 categories which brands can choose to avoid. Its ordinary commercial example includes avoiding otherwise legitimate video-game or motor content to fit a particular campaign. The page distinguishes pre-bid evaluation from post-purchase measurement. Neither classification nor measurement alone demonstrates a completed advertising exclusion. The advertised accreditation and accuracy remain vendor claims here; no accreditor audit or actual campaign was inspected. Original-derived lines59–111, particularly78–98; primary reader77–184.</p>\n<h2 id=\"an-announced-default-complicates-the-choice-model\">An announced default complicates the choice model</h2>\n<p>The [13 February2025 announcement](http[local research file] announces &#x27;Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize&#x27; and &#x27;P2P Sharing and Streaming&#x27; avoidance categories and says both will be enabled by default. This establishes an announced default policy; the activation date and customer uptake are unverified. It reports automatic provision of the former to advertisers and distribution to over100 platform partners. A supplied category or default does not prove every recipient enabled it or every listed site&#x27;s advertising stopped. The latter covers infrastructure that the text acknowledges has legitimate uses but can be misused.</p>\n<p>DV says it used three years of public NCMEC data, covering over300 domains/providers, cross-checked prior classifications and assessed remaining sites itself. It says it excluded large, well-moderated social/search services. This is DV&#x27;s account of input selection and transformation, not an independently verified NCMEC judgment or endorsement of DV&#x27;s resulting list. The underlying NCMEC table and its meaning were not acquired in this run. Named FBI outreach is an offered-assistance account, not acceptance or instructions. Original-derived72–138, decisive96–120; primary reader92–139. The captured original supplies the publication date.</p>\n<h2 id=\"review-and-evidence-access\">Review and evidence access</h2>\n<p>A [13 June2024 company statement](http[local research file] describes a publisher classification-review process, access to reports/logs, and separation of assessment from sales/client teams. It claims paying-publisher status does not soften ratings and gives an unnamed customer example. These are safeguards asserted by the company, not independently observed separations or a worked correction. It supplies no decision deadline, independent appeal adjudicator, mandatory advertiser reconsideration or restored-income outcome in the read body. Its automation/objectivity language does not establish absence of model or policy bias. Original-derived72–100; primary reader94–115.</p>\n<p>The [25 February2025 URL-reporting announcement](http[local research file] says DV advertisers using Brand Safety and Suitability measurement can request URL-level detail. Direct integration into its interface was &#x27;coming soon&#x27; and external integrations were planned later that year. Those are stages in a dated announcement; retrieval in2026 does not turn the plans into completed deployment. The described entitlement is for advertiser customers and does not itself give every affected publisher access to every customer&#x27;s report or preferences. No request was made. Original-derived72–97; primary reader95–118. Actual dates on the captured originals resolve the web-reader&#x27;s omitted publication dates; nearby recent-post dates are not used.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-revenue-model-and-configuration-authority\">The revenue model and configuration authority</h2>\n<p>The [FY2025 Form10-K](http[local research file] describes customer configuration distributed across the service, proprietary classification and customer feedback shaping product development. It reports90percent of2025 revenue from advertisers and10percent from supply-side customers. Advertiser fees are primarily based on measured transaction volume, commonly per thousand impressions; some percentage-of-spend arrangements are capped. Supply-side arrangements include minimum guarantees and tiered pricing. This supports a two-sided commercial model, not a fee per adverse classification or a proved financial cause of a specific exclusion.</p>\n<p>Exact retained source scope is product-10k.reader.txt: reader403–434 (customer feedback, product teams and configuration/classification) and1152–1225 (MD&amp;A overview, fee basis and revenue sources). The relevant prose was read; no full filing, audit opinion, revenue-table facsimile, individual contract or accounting record was inspected. The fiscal year is2025, not the capture year. No stockholder command, grant finance or external ownership branch was acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"structural-result-and-next-discriminator\">Structural result and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>The current offering contains several powers that should occupy separate places on the map: selecting source inputs, assigning a classification, choosing a default, changing customer settings and implementing a placement decision. A review can change one without necessarily changing the others. The acquired product description supports customer choice; the dated announcement supplies a vendor-chosen default policy, with implementation not independently observed. Neither cancels the other.</p>\n<p>The most revealing next input record is the exact public NCMEC dataset DV says it used, including whether its rows count provider reports, notices received or assessed illegal domains. Those meanings are not interchangeable. The missing implementation records are the category policy/version, a recipient&#x27;s actual configuration and a dated review/correction followed by recipient action. The historical court lane may illuminate the contested classification process but cannot prove these2025/2026 settings were used then.</p>\n<p>No customer login, publisher submission, operational classification query, harmful-content endpoint, payment, outreach or public release occurred. Acquisition closes pending independent review and the combined forest. All original files and derivative scopes are listed in product-captures.json; successful captures are not claims that every link or surrounding page was read.</p>",
        "path": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09/current-product.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-product",
          "w30-class-s-dv-review",
          "w30-class-s-dv-url",
          "w30-class-s-dv-defaults",
          "w30-class-s-dv-10k"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition is closed. Four original company HTML pages were retained and their full substantive text read. A current SEC-hosted FY2025 filing was read in specific passages through the primary web reader; no original filing was downloaded. These are company descriptions, not a customer configuration, independent accuracy audit or observed restoration. The historical FilmOn case is a separate lane. Current brand/product statements and consolidated issuer disclosures do not by themselves prove the exact contracting entity in the older lawsuit.\n\n## Category assignment and customer selection\n\nThe undated current brand-suitability product page (see source references) describes a proprietary classifier using AI and human review across several media types. It supplies more than100 categories which brands can choose to avoid. Its ordinary commercial example includes avoiding otherwise legitimate video-game or motor content to fit a particular campaign. The page distinguishes pre-bid evaluation from post-purchase measurement. Neither classification nor measurement alone demonstrates a completed advertising exclusion. The advertised accreditation and accuracy remain vendor claims here; no accreditor audit or actual campaign was inspected. Original-derived lines59–111, particularly78–98; primary reader77–184.\n\n## An announced default complicates the choice model\n\nThe 13 February2025 announcement (see source references) announces 'Highly Illicit: Do Not Monetize' and 'P2P Sharing and Streaming' avoidance categories and says both will be enabled by default. This establishes an announced default policy; the activation date and customer uptake are unverified. It reports automatic provision of the former to advertisers and distribution to over100 platform partners. A supplied category or default does not prove every recipient enabled it or every listed site's advertising stopped. The latter covers infrastructure that the text acknowledges has legitimate uses but can be misused.\n\nDV says it used three years of public NCMEC data, covering over300 domains/providers, cross-checked prior classifications and assessed remaining sites itself. It says it excluded large, well-moderated social/search services. This is DV's account of input selection and transformation, not an independently verified NCMEC judgment or endorsement of DV's resulting list. The underlying NCMEC table and its meaning were not acquired in this run. Named FBI outreach is an offered-assistance account, not acceptance or instructions. Original-derived72–138, decisive96–120; primary reader92–139. The captured original supplies the publication date.\n\n## Review and evidence access\n\nA 13 June2024 company statement (see source references) describes a publisher classification-review process, access to reports/logs, and separation of assessment from sales/client teams. It claims paying-publisher status does not soften ratings and gives an unnamed customer example. These are safeguards asserted by the company, not independently observed separations or a worked correction. It supplies no decision deadline, independent appeal adjudicator, mandatory advertiser reconsideration or restored-income outcome in the read body. Its automation/objectivity language does not establish absence of model or policy bias. Original-derived72–100; primary reader94–115.\n\nThe 25 February2025 URL-reporting announcement (see source references) says DV advertisers using Brand Safety and Suitability measurement can request URL-level detail. Direct integration into its interface was 'coming soon' and external integrations were planned later that year. Those are stages in a dated announcement; retrieval in2026 does not turn the plans into completed deployment. The described entitlement is for advertiser customers and does not itself give every affected publisher access to every customer's report or preferences. No request was made. Original-derived72–97; primary reader95–118. Actual dates on the captured originals resolve the web-reader's omitted publication dates; nearby recent-post dates are not used.\n\n## The revenue model and configuration authority\n\nThe FY2025 Form10-K (see source references) describes customer configuration distributed across the service, proprietary classification and customer feedback shaping product development. It reports90percent of2025 revenue from advertisers and10percent from supply-side customers. Advertiser fees are primarily based on measured transaction volume, commonly per thousand impressions; some percentage-of-spend arrangements are capped. Supply-side arrangements include minimum guarantees and tiered pricing. This supports a two-sided commercial model, not a fee per adverse classification or a proved financial cause of a specific exclusion.\n\nExact retained source scope is product-10k.reader.txt: reader403–434 (customer feedback, product teams and configuration/classification) and1152–1225 (MD&A overview, fee basis and revenue sources). The relevant prose was read; no full filing, audit opinion, revenue-table facsimile, individual contract or accounting record was inspected. The fiscal year is2025, not the capture year. No stockholder command, grant finance or external ownership branch was acquired.\n\n## Structural result and next discriminator\n\nThe current offering contains several powers that should occupy separate places on the map: selecting source inputs, assigning a classification, choosing a default, changing customer settings and implementing a placement decision. A review can change one without necessarily changing the others. The acquired product description supports customer choice; the dated announcement supplies a vendor-chosen default policy, with implementation not independently observed. Neither cancels the other.\n\nThe most revealing next input record is the exact public NCMEC dataset DV says it used, including whether its rows count provider reports, notices received or assessed illegal domains. Those meanings are not interchangeable. The missing implementation records are the category policy/version, a recipient's actual configuration and a dated review/correction followed by recipient action. The historical court lane may illuminate the contested classification process but cannot prove these2025/2026 settings were used then.\n\nNo customer login, publisher submission, operational classification query, harmful-content endpoint, payment, outreach or public release occurred. Acquisition closes pending independent review and the combined forest. All original files and derivative scopes are listed in product-captures.json; successful captures are not claims that every link or surrounding page was read.\n",
        "file": "research/filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case",
        "title": "FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit",
        "description": "Bounded acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. This packet concerns the historical FilmOn/DoubleVerify dispute, not current DoubleVerify product operation.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. This packet concerns the historical FilmOn/DoubleVerify dispute, not current DoubleVerify product operation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"originals-and-actual-reading\">Originals and actual reading</h2>\n<p>The [official Supreme Court opinion](http[local research file] FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. (2019) 7 Cal.5th133, S244157, was obtained by an ordinary public GET (redirect to www4.courts.ca.gov). The original is judicial-opinion.pdf: 28 PDF pages, SHA256 e6a005c6cbea8dd2a92b5481f5d93658ce940081c0e586b3f9582e84e46ccadb. The entire opinion&#x27;s substantive text, printed pp1-25/PDF2-26, and identifying/counsel pages were read; PDF5,24,26 were also visually checked. The parser contains occasional repeated phrases from the PDF text layer, so those decisive pages were checked against the visible original.</p>\n<p>This is the published California Supreme Court decision of 6 May2019, authored by Justice Cuellar with six concurring justices. It reversed the Second Appellate District, Division Three decision B264074; the trial case was Los Angeles Superior Court BC561987. Unlike the later eGumball opinion, this is a reported Supreme Court opinion, not an unpublished appellate disposition.</p>\n<p>The official case page led to the [filed media amicus brief](http[local research file] Its original, judicial-amicus.pdf, has58 scanned pages; SHA c49b1f15d44431457381f9a9eec9774db5e9b3cd90def7da9a5d2d5666e91227. Actual visual scope: PDF1-3 (covers/contents), PDF11-18 (printed10-17, interest and argument summary), PDF55-56 (printed54-55, conclusion/signature/certificate). The whole brief was not read. Additional rendered pages are not claimed as inspected.</p>\n<p>The [appellant&#x27;s opening brief](http[local research file] judicial-appellant.pdf, is44 scanned pages, SHA e9b4c0a8ec9332b151d75e383f1f9a69b592328781a507106743f9c479a747dc. Actual visual scope: PDF1 and11-17 (printed6-12). This narrow read tests the specifically discovered correction attempts and a settlement footnote; it is not a whole-brief or appendix read. The original correspondence and underlying appendix exhibits were not acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-historical-labels-meant-and-who-used-them\">What the historical labels meant and who used them</h2>\n<p>The opinion describes DoubleVerify gathering information and selling confidential reports to businesses considering advertising on websites. Its report glossary defined the categories. The Adult Content label encompassed mature material inappropriate for children, including explicit language, sounds and themes; it was not limited to pornography or unlawful material. The copyright streaming/file-sharing label encompassed sites presently or historically associated with distributing or accessing copyrighted material without suitable controls, licensing or permission (printed pp3-4/PDF4-5). The category definition is a provider&#x27;s classification rule, not an adjudication that every labelled site was currently infringing.</p>\n<p>The Supreme Court described the report&#x27;s three columns: domains/subdomains, total impressions, and thematic categories defined by DoubleVerify (printed p22/PDF23). Paying recipients agreed to confidentiality and used the reports for their business purposes (printed p23/PDF24). These pages establish the described classification/distribution mechanism; they do not identify a universal downstream blocking rule.</p>\n<p>FilmOn alleged the labels were false and caused existing or prospective advertising partners to refuse business. The opinion states those as allegations (printed p4/PDF5), not a damages finding or independently established causal estimate. This packet has no final calculation of lost revenue, advertiser instruction, restored contract or actual reclassification receipt.</p>\n<h2 id=\"an-actual-alleged-correction-attempt-with-its-limits\">An actual alleged correction attempt, with its limits</h2>\n<p>The opening brief bears a filed stamp of 16 January2018. FilmOn&#x27;s account says it learned of reports through a former client in late2013 and sent a cease-and-desist letter on12 December2013 demanding tag removal and correction. It says DoubleVerify subsequently described Adult Content as akin to an R or TV-MA rating, but did not clarify to advertisers that FilmOn&#x27;s content was nonpornographic or limit the label to particular channels. It further alleges that after an investigation DoubleVerify maintained the classifications despite letters, calls and meetings (printed pp10-12/PDF15-17).</p>\n<p>This is source-specific evidence that FilmOn formally asserted a disputed explanation/correction process, supported in its brief by appendix citations. It does not independently prove the contents of those communications, that the classification was false under its actual glossary, or that the alleged refusal persisted after2018. The distinction matters: a debate over whether a broad category communicated pornography, and whether it should apply to an entire network or individual channels, is more specific than a generic allegation of blacklisting.</p>\n<p>The same brief&#x27;s printed p12/PDF17 footnote2 says AOL was dismissed pursuant to a settlement on9 April2015. That is FilmOn counsel&#x27;s report about another named defendant at an earlier stage. No settlement agreement, dismissal order, terms or payment was acquired. It is not evidence of a DoubleVerify settlement, a correction or restored advertising.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-supreme-court-decided\">What the Supreme Court decided</h2>\n<p>The trial court granted DoubleVerify&#x27;s anti-SLAPP motion and the Court of Appeal affirmed. The Supreme Court reversed the latter judgment because DoubleVerify&#x27;s confidential reports did not qualify under Code of Civil Procedure425.16(e)(4), the public-interest catchall (printed pp2-6,17-25).</p>\n<p>The court&#x27;s inquiry identifies the public issue implicated by the speech, then asks about its functional relationship to public discussion. Audience, speaker and purpose inform that second inquiry. The mere presence of a broad public-interest subject, such as copyright or adult content, was insufficient here. The reports were exchanged privately for the recipients&#x27; business purposes and were not intended to participate in public discussion. This is a statutory procedural ruling, not a judicial validation of FilmOn&#x27;s allegation that the labels were false.</p>\n<p>The court expressly refused to exclude all commercially oriented or confidential speech categorically. No single contextual factor was dispositive. It also rejected FilmOn&#x27;s proposed commercial/noncommercial sorting, even though FilmOn won the ultimate reversal (printed pp15-16/PDF16-17; p23/PDF24). Both parties agreed the distinct section425.17(c) exemption did not apply because the reports concerned FilmOn, not DoubleVerify or a competitor (printed p14 fn4/PDF15). Thus winning the result does not mean every argument was adopted.</p>\n<p>The opinion grants judicial notice of copyright-case orders and legislative history (printed p18 fn6/PDF19); that does not convert its narrow anti-SLAPP disposition into an adjudication of the accuracy of all challenged labels. The actual final paragraph simply reverses (printed p25/PDF26). It orders no correction, reclassification, ad purchase, damages payment or service restoration.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-media-coalitions-requested-protection\">The media coalition&#x27;s requested protection</h2>\n<p>The filed amicus was submitted in support of DoubleVerify by Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.; The Hearst Corporation; Tegna Inc.; California News Publishers Association; and First Amendment Coalition. It was filed6 June2018 and dated29 May2018. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP counsel Kelli L. Sager, Thomas R. Burke and Rochelle L. Wilcox are named; Wilcox signed it (PDF1-2,55-56). These are documented amicus/representation roles, not evidence of ownership, category authorship, funding of DoubleVerify or control of its decisions.</p>\n<p>In the introductory interest statement, the amici describe their media/creative work and interest in protecting it from piracy. They support keeping rampant-infringement sites and services out of the legitimate advertising market and describe companies such as DoubleVerify as helping that effort (printed pp10-11/PDF11-12). Their summary says brands use assurance-provider information to instruct advertising networks where ads should or should not appear (printed p14/PDF15). That is the amici&#x27;s stated commercial mechanism and rationale, not independent proof that all listed amici bought this particular report.</p>\n<p>They argue that reports are informational products, analogous to news and films, rather than advertising for a product, and fear a broad commercial-context exception could endanger other speakers (printed pp15-17/PDF16-18). Their express request was to reject FilmOn&#x27;s arguments and affirm protection of DoubleVerify&#x27;s speech under anti-SLAPP (printed p54/PDF55). The Supreme Court did not grant that requested disposition. Its refusal to adopt a categorical commercial-speech exclusion overlaps part of their concern, but this packet does not infer that their brief caused that reasoning.</p>\n<h2 id=\"outcome-frontier-and-restrained-mapping\">Outcome frontier and restrained mapping</h2>\n<p>Four focused discovery queries sought the original and same-case remand/settlement/dismissal. They located the opinion, filed briefing and unrelated settlements/cases citing FilmOn. No later FilmOn-versus-DoubleVerify final merits judgment, correction, reclassification or advertising restoration record was located. This is a bounded search result, not proof those records or events do not exist. The only specifically named settlement found was the earlier AOL footnote, preserved at its attributed scope.</p>\n<p>Meaningful relations supported now are DoubleVerify-to-confidential-report category authorship/distribution as described by the court; FilmOn-to-DoubleVerify asserted correction demand; named amici-to-Supreme Court filed request for procedural protection; and Supreme Court-to-prior judgment reversal. A potential later remedy requires its own order, agreement or correction/recipient notice. The 2025 eGumball court&#x27;s reliance on FilmOn is a legal-precedent relationship, not a shared operational database. Acquisition is closed for root review; no new case, current product, ownership, payment or content-site branch was opened.</p>",
        "path": "filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09/judicial-case.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-filmon-opinion",
          "w30-class-s-filmon-amicus",
          "w30-class-s-filmon-appellant"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded acquisition closed, 9 September 2026. This packet concerns the historical FilmOn/DoubleVerify dispute, not current DoubleVerify product operation.\n\n## Originals and actual reading\n\nThe official Supreme Court opinion (see source references) FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. (2019) 7 Cal.5th133, S244157, was obtained by an ordinary public GET (redirect to www4.courts.ca.gov). The original is judicial-opinion.pdf: 28 PDF pages, SHA256 e6a005c6cbea8dd2a92b5481f5d93658ce940081c0e586b3f9582e84e46ccadb. The entire opinion's substantive text, printed pp1-25/PDF2-26, and identifying/counsel pages were read; PDF5,24,26 were also visually checked. The parser contains occasional repeated phrases from the PDF text layer, so those decisive pages were checked against the visible original.\n\nThis is the published California Supreme Court decision of 6 May2019, authored by Justice Cuellar with six concurring justices. It reversed the Second Appellate District, Division Three decision B264074; the trial case was Los Angeles Superior Court BC561987. Unlike the later eGumball opinion, this is a reported Supreme Court opinion, not an unpublished appellate disposition.\n\nThe official case page led to the filed media amicus brief (see source references) Its original, judicial-amicus.pdf, has58 scanned pages; SHA c49b1f15d44431457381f9a9eec9774db5e9b3cd90def7da9a5d2d5666e91227. Actual visual scope: PDF1-3 (covers/contents), PDF11-18 (printed10-17, interest and argument summary), PDF55-56 (printed54-55, conclusion/signature/certificate). The whole brief was not read. Additional rendered pages are not claimed as inspected.\n\nThe appellant's opening brief (see source references) judicial-appellant.pdf, is44 scanned pages, SHA e9b4c0a8ec9332b151d75e383f1f9a69b592328781a507106743f9c479a747dc. Actual visual scope: PDF1 and11-17 (printed6-12). This narrow read tests the specifically discovered correction attempts and a settlement footnote; it is not a whole-brief or appendix read. The original correspondence and underlying appendix exhibits were not acquired.\n\n## What the historical labels meant and who used them\n\nThe opinion describes DoubleVerify gathering information and selling confidential reports to businesses considering advertising on websites. Its report glossary defined the categories. The Adult Content label encompassed mature material inappropriate for children, including explicit language, sounds and themes; it was not limited to pornography or unlawful material. The copyright streaming/file-sharing label encompassed sites presently or historically associated with distributing or accessing copyrighted material without suitable controls, licensing or permission (printed pp3-4/PDF4-5). The category definition is a provider's classification rule, not an adjudication that every labelled site was currently infringing.\n\nThe Supreme Court described the report's three columns: domains/subdomains, total impressions, and thematic categories defined by DoubleVerify (printed p22/PDF23). Paying recipients agreed to confidentiality and used the reports for their business purposes (printed p23/PDF24). These pages establish the described classification/distribution mechanism; they do not identify a universal downstream blocking rule.\n\nFilmOn alleged the labels were false and caused existing or prospective advertising partners to refuse business. The opinion states those as allegations (printed p4/PDF5), not a damages finding or independently established causal estimate. This packet has no final calculation of lost revenue, advertiser instruction, restored contract or actual reclassification receipt.\n\n## An actual alleged correction attempt, with its limits\n\nThe opening brief bears a filed stamp of 16 January2018. FilmOn's account says it learned of reports through a former client in late2013 and sent a cease-and-desist letter on12 December2013 demanding tag removal and correction. It says DoubleVerify subsequently described Adult Content as akin to an R or TV-MA rating, but did not clarify to advertisers that FilmOn's content was nonpornographic or limit the label to particular channels. It further alleges that after an investigation DoubleVerify maintained the classifications despite letters, calls and meetings (printed pp10-12/PDF15-17).\n\nThis is source-specific evidence that FilmOn formally asserted a disputed explanation/correction process, supported in its brief by appendix citations. It does not independently prove the contents of those communications, that the classification was false under its actual glossary, or that the alleged refusal persisted after2018. The distinction matters: a debate over whether a broad category communicated pornography, and whether it should apply to an entire network or individual channels, is more specific than a generic allegation of blacklisting.\n\nThe same brief's printed p12/PDF17 footnote2 says AOL was dismissed pursuant to a settlement on9 April2015. That is FilmOn counsel's report about another named defendant at an earlier stage. No settlement agreement, dismissal order, terms or payment was acquired. It is not evidence of a DoubleVerify settlement, a correction or restored advertising.\n\n## What the Supreme Court decided\n\nThe trial court granted DoubleVerify's anti-SLAPP motion and the Court of Appeal affirmed. The Supreme Court reversed the latter judgment because DoubleVerify's confidential reports did not qualify under Code of Civil Procedure425.16(e)(4), the public-interest catchall (printed pp2-6,17-25).\n\nThe court's inquiry identifies the public issue implicated by the speech, then asks about its functional relationship to public discussion. Audience, speaker and purpose inform that second inquiry. The mere presence of a broad public-interest subject, such as copyright or adult content, was insufficient here. The reports were exchanged privately for the recipients' business purposes and were not intended to participate in public discussion. This is a statutory procedural ruling, not a judicial validation of FilmOn's allegation that the labels were false.\n\nThe court expressly refused to exclude all commercially oriented or confidential speech categorically. No single contextual factor was dispositive. It also rejected FilmOn's proposed commercial/noncommercial sorting, even though FilmOn won the ultimate reversal (printed pp15-16/PDF16-17; p23/PDF24). Both parties agreed the distinct section425.17(c) exemption did not apply because the reports concerned FilmOn, not DoubleVerify or a competitor (printed p14 fn4/PDF15). Thus winning the result does not mean every argument was adopted.\n\nThe opinion grants judicial notice of copyright-case orders and legislative history (printed p18 fn6/PDF19); that does not convert its narrow anti-SLAPP disposition into an adjudication of the accuracy of all challenged labels. The actual final paragraph simply reverses (printed p25/PDF26). It orders no correction, reclassification, ad purchase, damages payment or service restoration.\n\n## The media coalition's requested protection\n\nThe filed amicus was submitted in support of DoubleVerify by Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.; The Hearst Corporation; Tegna Inc.; California News Publishers Association; and First Amendment Coalition. It was filed6 June2018 and dated29 May2018. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP counsel Kelli L. Sager, Thomas R. Burke and Rochelle L. Wilcox are named; Wilcox signed it (PDF1-2,55-56). These are documented amicus/representation roles, not evidence of ownership, category authorship, funding of DoubleVerify or control of its decisions.\n\nIn the introductory interest statement, the amici describe their media/creative work and interest in protecting it from piracy. They support keeping rampant-infringement sites and services out of the legitimate advertising market and describe companies such as DoubleVerify as helping that effort (printed pp10-11/PDF11-12). Their summary says brands use assurance-provider information to instruct advertising networks where ads should or should not appear (printed p14/PDF15). That is the amici's stated commercial mechanism and rationale, not independent proof that all listed amici bought this particular report.\n\nThey argue that reports are informational products, analogous to news and films, rather than advertising for a product, and fear a broad commercial-context exception could endanger other speakers (printed pp15-17/PDF16-18). Their express request was to reject FilmOn's arguments and affirm protection of DoubleVerify's speech under anti-SLAPP (printed p54/PDF55). The Supreme Court did not grant that requested disposition. Its refusal to adopt a categorical commercial-speech exclusion overlaps part of their concern, but this packet does not infer that their brief caused that reasoning.\n\n## Outcome frontier and restrained mapping\n\nFour focused discovery queries sought the original and same-case remand/settlement/dismissal. They located the opinion, filed briefing and unrelated settlements/cases citing FilmOn. No later FilmOn-versus-DoubleVerify final merits judgment, correction, reclassification or advertising restoration record was located. This is a bounded search result, not proof those records or events do not exist. The only specifically named settlement found was the earlier AOL footnote, preserved at its attributed scope.\n\nMeaningful relations supported now are DoubleVerify-to-confidential-report category authorship/distribution as described by the court; FilmOn-to-DoubleVerify asserted correction demand; named amici-to-Supreme Court filed request for procedural protection; and Supreme Court-to-prior judgment reversal. A potential later remedy requires its own order, agreement or correction/recipient notice. The 2025 eGumball court's reliance on FilmOn is a legal-precedent relationship, not a shared operational database. Acquisition is closed for root review; no new case, current product, ownership, payment or content-site branch was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-judicial-case.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding",
        "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: three documented funding instruments",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. This bounded pass follows the latest forest review and the user's funding steering. It establishes funding for regulatory advocacy, a specific commission producing policy proposals, and a separately scoped privacy-research award. It does not establish donor authorship or approval of Australia's September 2026 exposure draft.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. This bounded pass follows the latest forest review and the user&#x27;s funding steering. It establishes funding for regulatory advocacy, a specific commission producing policy proposals, and a separately scoped privacy-research award. It does not establish donor authorship or approval of Australia&#x27;s September 2026 exposure draft.</p>\n<p>The most consequential bridge is McKinnon&#x27;s commission of two identified reports, one of which expressly recommends considering a duty of care and the other of which transmits EU and UK transparency models. Mannifera supplies a quantified award for advocacy during the Online Safety Act review. The Internet Society Foundation award has a different, documented children&#x27;s-privacy research purpose.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Relationship</th>\n<th>Amount and time</th>\n<th>Evidentiary state</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Mannifera → Reset Australia</td>\n<td>$40,000; labelled a 2024 Signature Grant</td>\n<td>Grantor names recipient and purpose. Currency code is not printed; Australian context, not converted to USD. No bank receipt or exact award/payment date acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Internet Society Foundation → Reset Tech Australia</td>\n<td>US$219,000; 8 January 2024–7 July 2025</td>\n<td>Project award record. A separate 2024 return names Reset Tech Australia Limited for US$87,600 monetary support; these figures must not be added as independent awards.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>McKinnon → two Reset reports</td>\n<td>Commissioned in 2023 and 2024; fee undisclosed</td>\n<td>Funder identifies both commissions. Recipient&#x27;s first report also describes the early-2023 approach. No signed contract or payment amount acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"recipient-disclosure-and-entity-boundaries\">Recipient disclosure and entity boundaries</h2>\n<p>Reset&#x27;s 2024 transparency report, printed/PDF page 37, lists Reset.Tech (US), Internet Society Foundation, Susan McKinnon Foundation, Boundless Foundation, “Manniferra,” an unnamed private donor and NSW Government. The NSW footnote limits the acknowledgment to support attending the social-media summit. No amounts or rights appear there. Page 6 describes duty-of-care advocacy; page 38 identifies future work on children&#x27;s privacy and the duty. These separate passages do not allocate any donor&#x27;s money to each activity. The report says annual accounts were being prepared; that historical statement does not establish their present availability. [Reset 2024 transparency report](http[local research file] inspected PDF pp2, 6, 37–38 and relevant report-title references.</p>\n<p>The Mannifera identification is supported by the donor explicitly naming Reset, rather than merely correcting a similar spelling. Internet Society Foundation&#x27;s return gives the legal recipient name. The other recipient-only names remain at their disclosed scope: no exact Boundless legal entity, unnamed donor identity, Reset US award amount or NSW reimbursement amount is resolved by this pass. The closed ACNC route was not reopened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"mannifera-a-quantified-advocacy-grant-and-an-identifiable-pooled-funding-route\">Mannifera: a quantified advocacy grant and an identifiable pooled-funding route</h2>\n<p>Under its own <strong>Reset Australia</strong> heading, Mannifera records a $40,000 2024 Signature Grant from its dis/misinformation round. Its purpose is to bring Reset&#x27;s research and advocacy on transparency mechanisms into policy development and the social-media committee inquiry. The passage specifically situates the work around the misinformation bill and Online Safety Act review. That supports an advocacy-funding edge; it does not identify an earmark for particular duty-of-care clauses. The preceding Australian Progress section also mentions Reset under a different heading; that ambiguous passage is not counted as a second Reset award. [Mannifera partner record](http[local research file] Reset heading and adjacent section, rendered lines 213–235.</p>\n<p>Mannifera&#x27;s FY24 account says a national dis/misinformation call opened in February 2024. Its “so far” recipient list does not include Reset. Consequently, the two pages do not fix Reset&#x27;s award date within FY2023/24 or contradict the later listing&#x27;s calendar-2024 label. [FY24 account](http[local research file] body paragraphs on the call and listed recipients, lines 5–15.</p>\n<p>The undated membership guide describes a formal partnership involving Philanthropy Australia, Australian Communities Foundation (ACF) and Reichstein Foundation, and a funds path through an ACF sub-fund. Members participate in collective funding decisions at annual Musters; a member Taskforce and Executive Officer oversee activities. Signature grants support core operations advancing advocacy projects. These are published programme arrangements, not the signed Reset award terms or evidence that every member approved that award. No individual donor veto, Reset board-appointment right, publication clearance or parliamentary drafting power is specified in the inspected passages. [Membership guide](http[local research file] physical PDF pp6–8, especially grant types, governance/legal structure and member participation. The URL&#x27;s 2024/04 path is not treated as a verified publication date.</p>\n<p>The administering organisation independently says Mannifera members give together through ACF. This corroborates the pooled route, without identifying the trustee/payor on Reset&#x27;s particular contract. [ACF Annual Report 2023/24](http[local research file] physical PDF p12, printed pp20–21. The report&#x27;s text search did not locate Reset; that is a search limitation, not proof ACF made no payment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"internet-society-foundation-restricted-research-purpose-separate-annual-support-figure\">Internet Society Foundation: restricted research purpose, separate annual support figure</h2>\n<p>The Foundation&#x27;s phase-two project record names Reset Tech Australia and US$219,000 for 8 January 2024–7 July 2025. It examines young people&#x27;s privacy expectations in educational technology and targeting, and how policymakers and regulators can implement those expectations. Its international scope includes Australia. The record establishes a funded research purpose, not a commission of Australia&#x27;s duty-of-care legislation; anticipated methods and results are not evidence of completed outputs. [Phase-two grant record](http[local research file] project dates, amount and research summary, rendered lines 87–141.</p>\n<p>The 2024 Form 990 identifies <strong>Internet Society Foundation, EIN 82-3285688</strong>. Schedule A names <strong>Reset Tech Australia Limited</strong> with <strong>US$87,600 monetary support</strong>. Schedule F has an unnamed same-amount research row; matching does not establish its recipient. Its supplement specifies accrual accounting. No recipient cash receipt or instalment reconciliation is established. Reported procedures require proposal approval under delegated authority and a board-approved budget, signed agreements, monitoring and completion reports. These are general institutional procedures, not acquired Reset-specific terms. [2024 Form 990](http[local research file] PDF p1; pp23–24 Schedule A table; p39 Schedule F row; p42 monitoring/accounting supplement. Inspected text supports these statements; image rendering failed, so no visual table verification is claimed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"mckinnon-a-funded-route-into-concrete-regulatory-proposals\">McKinnon: a funded route into concrete regulatory proposals</h2>\n<p>McKinnon says it commissioned Reset in 2023 and 2024 to produce <strong>Functioning or Failing?</strong> and <strong>Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia</strong>. This identifies particular research commissions rather than general organisational support. It discloses no fee, contractual clearance, intellectual-property allocation or termination provision. [McKinnon account](http[local research file] Reset section, rendered lines 61–66.</p>\n<p>The first report is dated May 2024. Its introduction says Susan McKinnon Foundation approached Reset early in 2023 to design a project testing the misinformation code; Reset describes designing the monitoring and experiments using methods from its global network. Its recommendations include considering a duty of care for misinformation/disinformation, EU-style risk assessments and researcher access. This establishes an initiated research commission and an output containing policy proposals. It does not establish that the commissioner required those conclusions or that government adopted them. [Functioning or Failing?](http[local research file] PDF pp1–5, especially recommendations p3 and introduction p5. Research validity and the body experiments were not independently audited here.</p>\n<p>The second original is dated June 2024. Its summary explicitly examines the EU Digital Services Act and UK Online Safety Act, proposing Australian risk assessments, prescribed annual transparency reports, independent audits, data portals and researcher access. The proposed application spans online safety and misinformation frameworks. This is an identified commissioned model-transmission artifact, not just ideological similarity. [Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia](http[local research file] PDF pp1–3. A public GET succeeded and those pages were extracted from the original 31-page PDF in memory. The funding caption&#x27;s logo did not appear in text extraction; the commissioning attribution rests on McKinnon&#x27;s named account, not an unread logo.</p>\n<p>McKinnon&#x27;s current privacy policy identifies <strong>The Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation, ABN 12 653 756 597</strong>, together with subsidiaries/affiliates, and also uses the company&#x27;s “Limited” legal name. The policy is dated September 2025. It identifies a legal entity within the present McKinnon group; it does not determine which entity signed the earlier commissions. [Privacy policy](http[local research file] opening application/definition paragraphs, rendered lines 52–65. The precise historic contracting party remains open.</p>\n<h2 id=\"integration-limit-and-next-obtainable-records\">Integration limit and next obtainable records</h2>\n<p>Safe financial verbs are: Mannifera <strong>records a 2024 grant for transparency advocacy</strong>; Internet Society Foundation <strong>lists a phase-two research award</strong> and <strong>reports annual monetary support</strong>; McKinnon <strong>says it commissioned two identified reports</strong>; Reset <strong>describes the commissioning approach and publishes recommendations</strong>. None should be replaced by “paid for the bill,” “dictated the duty” or “approved the final clauses.” The strongest supported mechanism is financing research and advocacy that formulates and circulates regulatory models. This pass does not isolate that funding&#x27;s causal effect on government choices.</p>\n<p>The narrow next records are the Mannifera/ACF grant letter and disbursement record identifying Reset&#x27;s legal counterparty and restrictions; the Foundation&#x27;s executed phase-two agreement, amendments and instalment reconciliation; and McKinnon&#x27;s 2023/24 scopes of work, executed contracts and publication-clearance provisions. Likely custodians are the named grantor/administrator and Reset. Their absence here leaves payment timing and substantive approval rights unresolved, not presumed absent. No request or outreach has been made.</p>\n<p>Acquisition scope: public grantor/recipient pages and scoped PDF readings only, observed 9 September 2026. Web image rendering returned cache misses for the Foundation return and Mannifera guide. The second McKinnon report exceeded the web reader&#x27;s size limit; one ordinary public GET supplied its opening pages. No originals are retained in this one-file lane and no original-file hashes are claimed. No ACNC, account, paid-access, Butterfield or wider donor branch was opened. This is the financial-instrument breakpoint for the next whole-case reassessment.</p>",
        "path": "funding-wave-2026-09-09/reset-funding.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-reset-disclosure",
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-partners",
          "w11-fund-s-mannifera-guide",
          "w11-fund-s-acf-report",
          "w11-fund-s-isf-award",
          "w11-fund-s-isf990",
          "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions",
          "w11-fund-s-functioning-report",
          "w11-fund-s-transparency-report",
          "w11-fund-s-mckinnon-identity"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. This bounded pass follows the latest forest review and the user's funding steering. It establishes funding for regulatory advocacy, a specific commission producing policy proposals, and a separately scoped privacy-research award. It does not establish donor authorship or approval of Australia's September 2026 exposure draft.\n\nThe most consequential bridge is McKinnon's commission of two identified reports, one of which expressly recommends considering a duty of care and the other of which transmits EU and UK transparency models. Mannifera supplies a quantified award for advocacy during the Online Safety Act review. The Internet Society Foundation award has a different, documented children's-privacy research purpose.\n\n| Relationship | Amount and time | Evidentiary state |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Mannifera → Reset Australia | $40,000; labelled a 2024 Signature Grant | Grantor names recipient and purpose. Currency code is not printed; Australian context, not converted to USD. No bank receipt or exact award/payment date acquired. |\n| Internet Society Foundation → Reset Tech Australia | US$219,000; 8 January 2024–7 July 2025 | Project award record. A separate 2024 return names Reset Tech Australia Limited for US$87,600 monetary support; these figures must not be added as independent awards. |\n| McKinnon → two Reset reports | Commissioned in 2023 and 2024; fee undisclosed | Funder identifies both commissions. Recipient's first report also describes the early-2023 approach. No signed contract or payment amount acquired. |\n\n## Recipient disclosure and entity boundaries\n\nReset's 2024 transparency report, printed/PDF page 37, lists Reset.Tech (US), Internet Society Foundation, Susan McKinnon Foundation, Boundless Foundation, “Manniferra,” an unnamed private donor and NSW Government. The NSW footnote limits the acknowledgment to support attending the social-media summit. No amounts or rights appear there. Page 6 describes duty-of-care advocacy; page 38 identifies future work on children's privacy and the duty. These separate passages do not allocate any donor's money to each activity. The report says annual accounts were being prepared; that historical statement does not establish their present availability. Reset 2024 transparency report (see source references) inspected PDF pp2, 6, 37–38 and relevant report-title references.\n\nThe Mannifera identification is supported by the donor explicitly naming Reset, rather than merely correcting a similar spelling. Internet Society Foundation's return gives the legal recipient name. The other recipient-only names remain at their disclosed scope: no exact Boundless legal entity, unnamed donor identity, Reset US award amount or NSW reimbursement amount is resolved by this pass. The closed ACNC route was not reopened.\n\n## Mannifera: a quantified advocacy grant and an identifiable pooled-funding route\n\nUnder its own **Reset Australia** heading, Mannifera records a $40,000 2024 Signature Grant from its dis/misinformation round. Its purpose is to bring Reset's research and advocacy on transparency mechanisms into policy development and the social-media committee inquiry. The passage specifically situates the work around the misinformation bill and Online Safety Act review. That supports an advocacy-funding edge; it does not identify an earmark for particular duty-of-care clauses. The preceding Australian Progress section also mentions Reset under a different heading; that ambiguous passage is not counted as a second Reset award. Mannifera partner record (see source references) Reset heading and adjacent section, rendered lines 213–235.\n\nMannifera's FY24 account says a national dis/misinformation call opened in February 2024. Its “so far” recipient list does not include Reset. Consequently, the two pages do not fix Reset's award date within FY2023/24 or contradict the later listing's calendar-2024 label. FY24 account (see source references) body paragraphs on the call and listed recipients, lines 5–15.\n\nThe undated membership guide describes a formal partnership involving Philanthropy Australia, Australian Communities Foundation (ACF) and Reichstein Foundation, and a funds path through an ACF sub-fund. Members participate in collective funding decisions at annual Musters; a member Taskforce and Executive Officer oversee activities. Signature grants support core operations advancing advocacy projects. These are published programme arrangements, not the signed Reset award terms or evidence that every member approved that award. No individual donor veto, Reset board-appointment right, publication clearance or parliamentary drafting power is specified in the inspected passages. Membership guide (see source references) physical PDF pp6–8, especially grant types, governance/legal structure and member participation. The URL's 2024/04 path is not treated as a verified publication date.\n\nThe administering organisation independently says Mannifera members give together through ACF. This corroborates the pooled route, without identifying the trustee/payor on Reset's particular contract. ACF Annual Report 2023/24 (see source references) physical PDF p12, printed pp20–21. The report's text search did not locate Reset; that is a search limitation, not proof ACF made no payment.\n\n## Internet Society Foundation: restricted research purpose, separate annual support figure\n\nThe Foundation's phase-two project record names Reset Tech Australia and US$219,000 for 8 January 2024–7 July 2025. It examines young people's privacy expectations in educational technology and targeting, and how policymakers and regulators can implement those expectations. Its international scope includes Australia. The record establishes a funded research purpose, not a commission of Australia's duty-of-care legislation; anticipated methods and results are not evidence of completed outputs. Phase-two grant record (see source references) project dates, amount and research summary, rendered lines 87–141.\n\nThe 2024 Form 990 identifies **Internet Society Foundation, EIN 82-3285688**. Schedule A names **Reset Tech Australia Limited** with **US$87,600 monetary support**. Schedule F has an unnamed same-amount research row; matching does not establish its recipient. Its supplement specifies accrual accounting. No recipient cash receipt or instalment reconciliation is established. Reported procedures require proposal approval under delegated authority and a board-approved budget, signed agreements, monitoring and completion reports. These are general institutional procedures, not acquired Reset-specific terms. 2024 Form 990 (see source references) PDF p1; pp23–24 Schedule A table; p39 Schedule F row; p42 monitoring/accounting supplement. Inspected text supports these statements; image rendering failed, so no visual table verification is claimed.\n\n## McKinnon: a funded route into concrete regulatory proposals\n\nMcKinnon says it commissioned Reset in 2023 and 2024 to produce **Functioning or Failing?** and **Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia**. This identifies particular research commissions rather than general organisational support. It discloses no fee, contractual clearance, intellectual-property allocation or termination provision. McKinnon account (see source references) Reset section, rendered lines 61–66.\n\nThe first report is dated May 2024. Its introduction says Susan McKinnon Foundation approached Reset early in 2023 to design a project testing the misinformation code; Reset describes designing the monitoring and experiments using methods from its global network. Its recommendations include considering a duty of care for misinformation/disinformation, EU-style risk assessments and researcher access. This establishes an initiated research commission and an output containing policy proposals. It does not establish that the commissioner required those conclusions or that government adopted them. Functioning or Failing? (see source references) PDF pp1–5, especially recommendations p3 and introduction p5. Research validity and the body experiments were not independently audited here.\n\nThe second original is dated June 2024. Its summary explicitly examines the EU Digital Services Act and UK Online Safety Act, proposing Australian risk assessments, prescribed annual transparency reports, independent audits, data portals and researcher access. The proposed application spans online safety and misinformation frameworks. This is an identified commissioned model-transmission artifact, not just ideological similarity. Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia (see source references) PDF pp1–3. A public GET succeeded and those pages were extracted from the original 31-page PDF in memory. The funding caption's logo did not appear in text extraction; the commissioning attribution rests on McKinnon's named account, not an unread logo.\n\nMcKinnon's current privacy policy identifies **The Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation, ABN 12 653 756 597**, together with subsidiaries/affiliates, and also uses the company's “Limited” legal name. The policy is dated September 2025. It identifies a legal entity within the present McKinnon group; it does not determine which entity signed the earlier commissions. Privacy policy (see source references) opening application/definition paragraphs, rendered lines 52–65. The precise historic contracting party remains open.\n\n## Integration limit and next obtainable records\n\nSafe financial verbs are: Mannifera **records a 2024 grant for transparency advocacy**; Internet Society Foundation **lists a phase-two research award** and **reports annual monetary support**; McKinnon **says it commissioned two identified reports**; Reset **describes the commissioning approach and publishes recommendations**. None should be replaced by “paid for the bill,” “dictated the duty” or “approved the final clauses.” The strongest supported mechanism is financing research and advocacy that formulates and circulates regulatory models. This pass does not isolate that funding's causal effect on government choices.\n\nThe narrow next records are the Mannifera/ACF grant letter and disbursement record identifying Reset's legal counterparty and restrictions; the Foundation's executed phase-two agreement, amendments and instalment reconciliation; and McKinnon's 2023/24 scopes of work, executed contracts and publication-clearance provisions. Likely custodians are the named grantor/administrator and Reset. Their absence here leaves payment timing and substantive approval rights unresolved, not presumed absent. No request or outreach has been made.\n\nAcquisition scope: public grantor/recipient pages and scoped PDF readings only, observed 9 September 2026. Web image rendering returned cache misses for the Foundation return and Mannifera guide. The second McKinnon report exceeded the web reader's size limit; one ordinary public GET supplied its opening pages. No originals are retained in this one-file lane and no original-file hashes are claimed. No ACNC, account, paid-access, Butterfield or wider donor branch was opened. This is the financial-instrument breakpoint for the next whole-case reassessment.\n",
        "file": "research/funding-wave-2026-09-09-reset-funding.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding",
        "title": "UK model funding: money, work and remaining decision rights",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition after the duty-care forest review. Primary records below establish financed policy work and institutional succession. They do not establish donor approval of specific statutory clauses. No outreach or public release.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition after the duty-care forest review. Primary records below establish financed policy work and institutional succession. They do not establish donor approval of specific statutory clauses. No outreach or public release.</p>\n<h2 id=\"carnegie-uk-recipient-identity-and-restricted-purpose\">Carnegie UK: recipient identity and restricted purpose</h2>\n<p>The recipient is The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, Scottish charity SC012799 / Irish charity 20142957, incorporated by Royal Charter. Do not merge it with Carnegie Corporation of New York or other similarly named Carnegie foundations.</p>\n<p>The 2021 accounts, notes 4 and 19 (printed26 and40; PDF26 and40), report GBP122,500 Minderoo grant income and GBP123,330 Luminate partnership income. Note19 expressly assigns both to Harm Regulation and Social Media. Printed8/PDF8 describes that project as promoting a duty-of-care regulatory system with Woods and Walsh, including a reworked bill, proposed amendments, parliamentary evidence and advice to the UN Special Rapporteur. These are reported restricted project income, not new independent donor cash confirmations or personal payments to the authors.</p>\n<p>2021 balances and spending: Luminate opening108,357 + income123,330 - expenditure107,756 = closing123,931; Minderoo opening0 + income122,500 - expenditure32,468 = closing90,032. The 2022 comparative within the 2023 accounts reports no new income to these funds: Luminate resources expended and transfers122,500, closing1,431; Minderoo resources expended and transfers54,572, closing35,460. These are movements in the same funds, not additional grants to sum indiscriminately.</p>\n<p>The 2023 accounts note4 reports GBP168,844 Luminate partnership income for2023. Note16 records the online-safety fund spending/transfer line as170,275 for Luminate,35,460 for Minderoo and3,600 for an unnamed donation, closing at zero. Narrative printed8 calls the financial support Luminate/Reset; this does not resolve the contracting legal entity or mean two separate grants. Note16 states the funding supported completion of work on the Online Safety Act.</p>\n<p>Important source anomaly: note16&#x27;s current-year opening heading actually prints 1 Jan2022. Local visual inspection of PDF28 confirms this is in the document, not a parser error. Its opening balances match the preceding2022 closing balances; the page says year to31Dec2023, its closing column31Dec2023, and note4 independently labels168,844 as2023. Preserve the anomaly; infer the opening heading likely retained the previous year. Do not silently correct a quoted table.</p>\n<p>Carnegie&#x27;s2023 report separately identifies its endowment and its own governing board as resources and decision-makers. Perrin was a trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member in that report. The trustees set strategy/budgets, with execution delegated to management. A donor&#x27;s restricted purpose constrains permissible expenditure; the published accounts do not reveal a donor veto over conclusions, ministerial appointments, draft wording or publication.</p>\n<p>2021 source: http[local research file] . Web PDF accessible,46pages; scoped project/finance sections read. 2023 source: http[local research file] .31pages; finance/governance/project sections read; original retained and note16 visually inspected. 2023 report signed5June2024. Local original SHA256 e3ff7704f72954aa1df542aad2aa30c8395806068a4fcd9f2edbd3877fa57c7f,788306bytes. Do not infer a2026 grant from website upload/index dates.</p>\n<h2 id=\"an-identifiable-financed-international-output\">An identifiable financed international output</h2>\n<p>Carnegie&#x27;s22November2021 announcement credits Frontier Technology, a Minderoo Foundation initiative, for financial support of its advice to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues. Woods/Perrin carried the systems/risk approach into that advice. This is attributable financial support for a named international output. It is not evidence the UN adopted all its recommendations, or that Minderoo dictated them. Amount and agreement remain absent; do not count this as a new additional grant outside the accounts&#x27; project funding.</p>\n<p>http[local research file] . Primary announcement body read; no UN adoption audit in this pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"succession-and-reset-support\">Succession and Reset support</h2>\n<p>Carnegie&#x27;s26October2023 transition statement says its programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through the new Online Safety Act Network, supported by former partner Reset. The2023 report independently says Carnegie supported development of the new network. This establishes deliberate succession of expertise and convening work after enactment, not ownership of the network or transfer of every employee/asset.</p>\n<p>http[local research file] . Primary body read. Indexed older homepage at http[local research file] repeats Reset support, but a fresh open redirects to http[local research file] and the fetched body no longer mentions Reset. Thus rely on the dated transition statement for historical support, not a claim about the exact current funding arrangement. The renamed network&#x27;s2026 legal operator, grant recipient, current funders, budget and agreement rights remain consequential gaps. The current about-page route returns an internal error; stop that route.</p>\n<h2 id=\"funder-process-a-map-to-records-not-the-missing-agreement\">Funder process: a map to records, not the missing agreement</h2>\n<p>Luminate&#x27;s current funding-process page describes strategy alignment, internally sourced opportunities (no unsolicited applications), due diligence, approval and legal funding agreements setting structure and reporting. It also offers unrestricted funding and ongoing programmatic contact. This makes grant proposal, internal approval, signed agreement and reporting schedule specific plausible evidence targets. Generic present-day procedure cannot establish the terms of a2021/2023 Carnegie award.</p>\n<p>http[local research file] . Primary body available. Luminate Foundation Inc&#x27;s2023 990-PF was accessible: http[local research file] . Web-text searches for Carnegie and Reset found no match. This is a limited search result, not proof of no grant; the correct contracting entity and grant year remain unresolved. Do not merge Luminate Foundation Inc automatically with every Luminate/Reset-branded award.</p>\n<h2 id=\"counterexamples-that-must-survive-the-map\">Counterexamples that must survive the map</h2>\n<p>The2021 accounts separately identify GBP90,000 Scottish Government funding for National Digital Ethics; this is a different restricted project, not evidence the government funded the Harm Regulation project. Note5 reports GBP76,437 as the value of Google advertising credits used, not cash, and describes their general charitable promotion use. The2020 comparative names Oak Foundation under Affordable Credit, not online safety. These are real relations with different purposes; attaching them all to a single online-regulation campaign would manufacture the causal conclusion.</p>\n<p>Carnegie&#x27;s reserve/governance disclosures support a mixed-resource organization, not a foundation merely passing through outside instructions. Strategic patronage can still shape which work receives sustained capacity. The unanswered question is its extent at identifiable decisions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"high-information-records-now-specified\">High-information records now specified</h2>\n<p>Obtain the signed Carnegie Luminate/Reset and Minderoo grant agreements and schedules, including contracting entities, grant period, restricted deliverables, amendment/publication approval, reporting and clawback terms. Compare Carnegie trustee/programme approval records to those schedules. Obtain the2023 network transition agreement and its legal/payroll/fiscal-host arrangement. These should distinguish topic selection and capacity support from approval of outputs. Existence of some agreement/reporting documents is strongly implied by accounts and published funding procedure, but their availability is unverified.</p>\n<p>Acquisition stopped at this coherent funding-to-output breakpoint. Root must integrate Reset&#x27;s parallel return and explicitly reassess the whole case before selecting another acquisition run.</p>\n<h2 id=\"incidental-same-page-coordination-evidence-scoped-for-next-review\">Incidental same-page coordination evidence, scoped for next review</h2>\n<p>Root checked the primary Mannifera partner page while verifying Reset&#x27;s grant. Its Human Rights Law Centre section explicitly records a2024 $60,000 dis/misinformation Signature Grant (currency code unspecified) and says supported work aligns legal/tech experts around reform positions, then trains civil-society advocates and makes the public case. It identifies the misinformation bill, Online Safety Act reforms and privacy reforms as the policy opportunities. This is a published purpose of funded coalition-building; it does not identify all participants, a particular shared clause, an executed payment or a direction to Reset. The previously listed2023/2022 grants must not be folded into the2024 purpose without further evidence. No additional acquisition branch was opened. Source: http[local research file] , Human Rights Law Centre heading, rendered lines9-33, observed9September2026.</p>",
        "path": "funding-wave-2026-09-09/uk-model-funding.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2021",
          "w11-fund-s-carnegie2023",
          "w11-fund-s-un-advice",
          "w11-fund-s-succession",
          "w11-fund-s-luminate-process"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition after the duty-care forest review. Primary records below establish financed policy work and institutional succession. They do not establish donor approval of specific statutory clauses. No outreach or public release.\n\n## Carnegie UK: recipient identity and restricted purpose\n\nThe recipient is The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, Scottish charity SC012799 / Irish charity 20142957, incorporated by Royal Charter. Do not merge it with Carnegie Corporation of New York or other similarly named Carnegie foundations.\n\nThe 2021 accounts, notes 4 and 19 (printed26 and40; PDF26 and40), report GBP122,500 Minderoo grant income and GBP123,330 Luminate partnership income. Note19 expressly assigns both to Harm Regulation and Social Media. Printed8/PDF8 describes that project as promoting a duty-of-care regulatory system with Woods and Walsh, including a reworked bill, proposed amendments, parliamentary evidence and advice to the UN Special Rapporteur. These are reported restricted project income, not new independent donor cash confirmations or personal payments to the authors.\n\n2021 balances and spending: Luminate opening108,357 + income123,330 - expenditure107,756 = closing123,931; Minderoo opening0 + income122,500 - expenditure32,468 = closing90,032. The 2022 comparative within the 2023 accounts reports no new income to these funds: Luminate resources expended and transfers122,500, closing1,431; Minderoo resources expended and transfers54,572, closing35,460. These are movements in the same funds, not additional grants to sum indiscriminately.\n\nThe 2023 accounts note4 reports GBP168,844 Luminate partnership income for2023. Note16 records the online-safety fund spending/transfer line as170,275 for Luminate,35,460 for Minderoo and3,600 for an unnamed donation, closing at zero. Narrative printed8 calls the financial support Luminate/Reset; this does not resolve the contracting legal entity or mean two separate grants. Note16 states the funding supported completion of work on the Online Safety Act.\n\nImportant source anomaly: note16's current-year opening heading actually prints 1 Jan2022. Local visual inspection of PDF28 confirms this is in the document, not a parser error. Its opening balances match the preceding2022 closing balances; the page says year to31Dec2023, its closing column31Dec2023, and note4 independently labels168,844 as2023. Preserve the anomaly; infer the opening heading likely retained the previous year. Do not silently correct a quoted table.\n\nCarnegie's2023 report separately identifies its endowment and its own governing board as resources and decision-makers. Perrin was a trustee and Audit and Risk Committee member in that report. The trustees set strategy/budgets, with execution delegated to management. A donor's restricted purpose constrains permissible expenditure; the published accounts do not reveal a donor veto over conclusions, ministerial appointments, draft wording or publication.\n\n2021 source: http[local research file] . Web PDF accessible,46pages; scoped project/finance sections read. 2023 source: http[local research file] .31pages; finance/governance/project sections read; original retained and note16 visually inspected. 2023 report signed5June2024. Local original SHA256 e3ff7704f72954aa1df542aad2aa30c8395806068a4fcd9f2edbd3877fa57c7f,788306bytes. Do not infer a2026 grant from website upload/index dates.\n\n## An identifiable financed international output\n\nCarnegie's22November2021 announcement credits Frontier Technology, a Minderoo Foundation initiative, for financial support of its advice to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues. Woods/Perrin carried the systems/risk approach into that advice. This is attributable financial support for a named international output. It is not evidence the UN adopted all its recommendations, or that Minderoo dictated them. Amount and agreement remain absent; do not count this as a new additional grant outside the accounts' project funding.\n\nhttp[local research file] . Primary announcement body read; no UN adoption audit in this pass.\n\n## Succession and Reset support\n\nCarnegie's26October2023 transition statement says its programme ends and Woods/Walsh continue through the new Online Safety Act Network, supported by former partner Reset. The2023 report independently says Carnegie supported development of the new network. This establishes deliberate succession of expertise and convening work after enactment, not ownership of the network or transfer of every employee/asset.\n\nhttp[local research file] . Primary body read. Indexed older homepage at http[local research file] repeats Reset support, but a fresh open redirects to http[local research file] and the fetched body no longer mentions Reset. Thus rely on the dated transition statement for historical support, not a claim about the exact current funding arrangement. The renamed network's2026 legal operator, grant recipient, current funders, budget and agreement rights remain consequential gaps. The current about-page route returns an internal error; stop that route.\n\n## Funder process: a map to records, not the missing agreement\n\nLuminate's current funding-process page describes strategy alignment, internally sourced opportunities (no unsolicited applications), due diligence, approval and legal funding agreements setting structure and reporting. It also offers unrestricted funding and ongoing programmatic contact. This makes grant proposal, internal approval, signed agreement and reporting schedule specific plausible evidence targets. Generic present-day procedure cannot establish the terms of a2021/2023 Carnegie award.\n\nhttp[local research file] . Primary body available. Luminate Foundation Inc's2023 990-PF was accessible: http[local research file] . Web-text searches for Carnegie and Reset found no match. This is a limited search result, not proof of no grant; the correct contracting entity and grant year remain unresolved. Do not merge Luminate Foundation Inc automatically with every Luminate/Reset-branded award.\n\n## Counterexamples that must survive the map\n\nThe2021 accounts separately identify GBP90,000 Scottish Government funding for National Digital Ethics; this is a different restricted project, not evidence the government funded the Harm Regulation project. Note5 reports GBP76,437 as the value of Google advertising credits used, not cash, and describes their general charitable promotion use. The2020 comparative names Oak Foundation under Affordable Credit, not online safety. These are real relations with different purposes; attaching them all to a single online-regulation campaign would manufacture the causal conclusion.\n\nCarnegie's reserve/governance disclosures support a mixed-resource organization, not a foundation merely passing through outside instructions. Strategic patronage can still shape which work receives sustained capacity. The unanswered question is its extent at identifiable decisions.\n\n## High-information records now specified\n\nObtain the signed Carnegie Luminate/Reset and Minderoo grant agreements and schedules, including contracting entities, grant period, restricted deliverables, amendment/publication approval, reporting and clawback terms. Compare Carnegie trustee/programme approval records to those schedules. Obtain the2023 network transition agreement and its legal/payroll/fiscal-host arrangement. These should distinguish topic selection and capacity support from approval of outputs. Existence of some agreement/reporting documents is strongly implied by accounts and published funding procedure, but their availability is unverified.\n\nAcquisition stopped at this coherent funding-to-output breakpoint. Root must integrate Reset's parallel return and explicitly reassess the whole case before selecting another acquisition run.\n\n## Incidental same-page coordination evidence, scoped for next review\n\nRoot checked the primary Mannifera partner page while verifying Reset's grant. Its Human Rights Law Centre section explicitly records a2024 $60,000 dis/misinformation Signature Grant (currency code unspecified) and says supported work aligns legal/tech experts around reform positions, then trains civil-society advocates and makes the public case. It identifies the misinformation bill, Online Safety Act reforms and privacy reforms as the policy opportunities. This is a published purpose of funded coalition-building; it does not identify all participants, a particular shared clause, an executed payment or a direction to Reset. The previously listed2023/2022 grants must not be folded into the2024 purpose without further evidence. No additional acquisition branch was opened. Source: http[local research file] , Human Rights Law Centre heading, rendered lines9-33, observed9September2026.\n",
        "file": "research/funding-wave-2026-09-09-uk-model-funding.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings",
        "title": "GDI classification recourse: an appeal is described, but downstream correction remains unproved",
        "description": "Bounded acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. Three primary records were read: GDI's April 2024 parliamentary evidence, its privacy/research policy updated April 2026, and IAS's dated announcement that it was discontinuing GDI input. Two original HTML files and one official-reader derivative were retained. The exact procedures differ in date and scope; non",
        "html": "<p>Bounded acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. Three primary records were read: GDI&#x27;s April 2024 parliamentary evidence, its privacy/research policy updated April 2026, and IAS&#x27;s dated announcement that it was discontinuing GDI input. Two original HTML files and one official-reader derivative were retained. The exact procedures differ in date and scope; none supplies an executed distribution agreement or proves an individual appeal changed advertising decisions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"historical-publisher-appeal-and-the-decision-split\">Historical publisher appeal and the decision split</h2>\n<p>GDI CEO Clare Melford&#x27;s written evidence <strong>FON0071, dated 29 April 2024</strong>, expressly says publishers can appeal their ratings through a linked review form on GDI&#x27;s contact page. Under <strong>GDI&#x27;s Review Process</strong>, it describes a <strong>two-to-three-week</strong> review and regular site reassessment, with ratings able to change when content changes. This is an explicit publisher-facing procedure described by the organisation to Parliament, stronger evidence than an invitation for academics to critique methodology. It is not a tribunal finding, a tested service-level guarantee, or proof of a successful appeal.</p>\n<p>The preceding <strong>GDI&#x27;s Service</strong> section describes risk data produced using AI and human review. It says advertising technology companies use that data in purchasing, and attributes ultimate purchasing and data-use control to licensees. GDI also says it charges for the data. These are GDI&#x27;s statements about its commercial mechanism, not independently read licence terms. They support separating classification, licensing and the recipient&#x27;s advertising decision; they do not establish that GDI could compel a customer to undo a decision after a rating changed. The evidence does not publish an evidentiary test for appeal, reviewer independence, reasons requirement, interim suspension, deletion deadline, update delivery protocol or recipient acknowledgement.</p>\n<p>Source: [FON0071 official parliamentary publication](http[local research file] headings <strong>GDI&#x27;s Service</strong> and <strong>GDI&#x27;s Review Process</strong>; retained reader lines 41–61, date at line 74. Full substantive reader text was read. The submission refers to a screenshot and links a review form; neither the screenshot nor the target form was acquired or exercised. Do not infer that the same form or review duration remains current in September 2026. The statement is not a detailed, versioned DEL methodology or an identification of the criteria governing the 2024 Oracle segment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-research-output-complaints-broader-standing-qualified-correction\">Current research-output complaints: broader standing, qualified correction</h2>\n<p>GDI&#x27;s <strong>Privacy Policy, last updated 20 April 2026</strong>, identifies Disinformation Index Ltd as controller. Section 15 expressly accepts questions, concerns or complaints about personal-data processing <strong>or any research outputs</strong>, and says it will consider representations and, where appropriate, review, clarify or update findings. Section 19.3 acknowledges that some projects may have no advance notice to platforms or stakeholders; it describes a post-publication enquiry route, prompt review/response and corrective action where appropriate. This gives a public route to raise a research-output concern, although it does not promise the requested substantive result.</p>\n<p>The boundaries matter. Section 1 excludes personal-data processing for services under a separate agreement from this notice&#x27;s coverage. Sections 14–16 describe data-subject rights and supervisory complaints, subject to applicable law and limitations; those do not automatically turn a corporate publisher&#x27;s disagreement with a rating into a successful data-protection claim. Section 19.1 promises deletion of unnecessary or inaccurate personal data without undue delay, which is not an explicit promise to delete a domain rating or notify every advertising recipient. Section 19.3 says dedicated project notices describe retention and sharing but are not routinely published. No such project notice was obtained, and no contact was made.</p>\n<p>This policy does not supply a numerical research-complaint deadline equivalent to the historical two-to-three-week account, an independent appeal tier, or a rule requiring downstream customers to replace cached classifications or resume advertising. It must not be retroactively applied as the DEL&#x27;s 2024 operating rules. Its statement in section 18 about personal data not being subject to automated decision-making with legal or significant effects is GDI&#x27;s current self-description, not an audited conclusion about historical commercial outcomes.</p>\n<p>Source: [GDI Privacy Policy](http[local research file] sections 1, 14–16, 18, 19.1–19.4 and final update date. Entire substantive text sections 1–20 was read through the official reader. Two embedded collection/retention tables were not visually read; no table contents are inferred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-distributor-says-it-ended-the-input-rather-than-documenting-an-appeal-result\">A distributor says it ended the input, rather than documenting an appeal result</h2>\n<p>IAS&#x27;s <strong>IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance</strong> announces a decision to discontinue the limited GDI input in that product and says its past use of GDI would not affect that solution going forward. The page describes customers selecting exclusions by categories and risk levels, but it does not publish the exact former GDI fields, a customer migration log, deletion protocol or an individual corrected classification. This is a directly named distributor&#x27;s reported product change, not an observed technical removal or evidence that a particular publisher won an appeal. Its stated benefit claims, including neutrality and independence, are provider assertions rather than independent judgments.</p>\n<p>The headline and dateline say <strong>18 December 2025</strong>. Retained HTML explicitly separates <code>datePublished</code> <strong>2025-12-18T18:17:32Z</strong> from <code>dateModified</code> <strong>2026-07-06T16:30:34Z</strong>, and the posted-date elements display both dates. The September 2026 captured wording cannot be assumed identical to the original December wording; no version comparison was acquired. Do not assign an exact implementation date from those page dates alone.</p>\n<p>Source: [IAS announcement](http[local research file] full substantive announcement, especially the paragraph beginning its continuous-improvement explanation. Full body was reader-read; original HTML date elements and JSON-LD were locally inspected. This is distinct from Oracle&#x27;s announced 30 September 2024 service end in the prior accepted packet, and from current GDI research products.</p>\n<h2 id=\"historical-funding-disclosure-present-in-the-same-evidence\">Historical funding disclosure present in the same evidence</h2>\n<p>FON0071&#x27;s <strong>GDI and Government Funding</strong> section says GDI had received no UK government funding since 2022; describes FCDO Russia-unit Countering Disinformation and Media Development work in 2018–2022 to develop large-scale detection and country studies; and says the supporting grant expired in March 2023. The receipt-period statement and later grant-expiry date are not a self-evident contradiction. It also attributes then-current resources to private foundations, commercial data licensing and a small EU Horizon Europe grant. This is a historical recipient disclosure, not donor-side confirmation, acquired conditions, proof of payment dates or government approval of a particular rating. No funding genealogy was pursued.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discriminating-gap-and-stopping-boundary\">Discriminating gap and stopping boundary</h2>\n<p>The evidence now defeats the broad claim that no publisher appeal was publicly described. It also leaves a distinct question unanswered: <strong>what obliges a data recipient to stop using or replace a successfully challenged signal?</strong> GDI may revise a rating while an advertiser independently declines the inventory; the acquired documents do not reconcile those steps or prove any such instance occurred.</p>\n<p>The most useful expected instruments are held by GDI and its relevant licensee: the dated publisher-review procedure behind the 2024 form; a service-specific notice or licence annex defining corrections, updates and deletion; and an actual recipient instruction/acknowledgement following a resolved rating. IAS&#x27;s versioned discontinuation/migration specification would test its broader no-continuing-effect statement. These are missing records, not proof that no rules or corrections exist.</p>\n<p>The 2019 GDI methodology PDF reader returned an unsafe-open non-retryable error and was closed without retry. It was not used as methodological evidence. The previously closed 2022 policy PDF and Jounce routes were not reopened even where search results resurfaced them. No named-site score audit, customer system, operational list, form submission, account, or harmful-content endpoint was accessed. The packet closes at three read primary records; acquisition and custody details are in <code>recourse-captures.json</code>.</p>",
        "path": "gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09/recourse-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-privacy",
          "w32-gdi-s-fonevidence",
          "w32-gdi-s-iasexit"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. Three primary records were read: GDI's April 2024 parliamentary evidence, its privacy/research policy updated April 2026, and IAS's dated announcement that it was discontinuing GDI input. Two original HTML files and one official-reader derivative were retained. The exact procedures differ in date and scope; none supplies an executed distribution agreement or proves an individual appeal changed advertising decisions.\n\n## Historical publisher appeal and the decision split\n\nGDI CEO Clare Melford's written evidence **FON0071, dated 29 April 2024**, expressly says publishers can appeal their ratings through a linked review form on GDI's contact page. Under **GDI's Review Process**, it describes a **two-to-three-week** review and regular site reassessment, with ratings able to change when content changes. This is an explicit publisher-facing procedure described by the organisation to Parliament, stronger evidence than an invitation for academics to critique methodology. It is not a tribunal finding, a tested service-level guarantee, or proof of a successful appeal.\n\nThe preceding **GDI's Service** section describes risk data produced using AI and human review. It says advertising technology companies use that data in purchasing, and attributes ultimate purchasing and data-use control to licensees. GDI also says it charges for the data. These are GDI's statements about its commercial mechanism, not independently read licence terms. They support separating classification, licensing and the recipient's advertising decision; they do not establish that GDI could compel a customer to undo a decision after a rating changed. The evidence does not publish an evidentiary test for appeal, reviewer independence, reasons requirement, interim suspension, deletion deadline, update delivery protocol or recipient acknowledgement.\n\nSource: FON0071 official parliamentary publication (see source references) headings **GDI's Service** and **GDI's Review Process**; retained reader lines 41–61, date at line 74. Full substantive reader text was read. The submission refers to a screenshot and links a review form; neither the screenshot nor the target form was acquired or exercised. Do not infer that the same form or review duration remains current in September 2026. The statement is not a detailed, versioned DEL methodology or an identification of the criteria governing the 2024 Oracle segment.\n\n## Current research-output complaints: broader standing, qualified correction\n\nGDI's **Privacy Policy, last updated 20 April 2026**, identifies Disinformation Index Ltd as controller. Section 15 expressly accepts questions, concerns or complaints about personal-data processing **or any research outputs**, and says it will consider representations and, where appropriate, review, clarify or update findings. Section 19.3 acknowledges that some projects may have no advance notice to platforms or stakeholders; it describes a post-publication enquiry route, prompt review/response and corrective action where appropriate. This gives a public route to raise a research-output concern, although it does not promise the requested substantive result.\n\nThe boundaries matter. Section 1 excludes personal-data processing for services under a separate agreement from this notice's coverage. Sections 14–16 describe data-subject rights and supervisory complaints, subject to applicable law and limitations; those do not automatically turn a corporate publisher's disagreement with a rating into a successful data-protection claim. Section 19.1 promises deletion of unnecessary or inaccurate personal data without undue delay, which is not an explicit promise to delete a domain rating or notify every advertising recipient. Section 19.3 says dedicated project notices describe retention and sharing but are not routinely published. No such project notice was obtained, and no contact was made.\n\nThis policy does not supply a numerical research-complaint deadline equivalent to the historical two-to-three-week account, an independent appeal tier, or a rule requiring downstream customers to replace cached classifications or resume advertising. It must not be retroactively applied as the DEL's 2024 operating rules. Its statement in section 18 about personal data not being subject to automated decision-making with legal or significant effects is GDI's current self-description, not an audited conclusion about historical commercial outcomes.\n\nSource: GDI Privacy Policy (see source references) sections 1, 14–16, 18, 19.1–19.4 and final update date. Entire substantive text sections 1–20 was read through the official reader. Two embedded collection/retention tables were not visually read; no table contents are inferred.\n\n## A distributor says it ended the input, rather than documenting an appeal result\n\nIAS's **IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance** announces a decision to discontinue the limited GDI input in that product and says its past use of GDI would not affect that solution going forward. The page describes customers selecting exclusions by categories and risk levels, but it does not publish the exact former GDI fields, a customer migration log, deletion protocol or an individual corrected classification. This is a directly named distributor's reported product change, not an observed technical removal or evidence that a particular publisher won an appeal. Its stated benefit claims, including neutrality and independence, are provider assertions rather than independent judgments.\n\nThe headline and dateline say **18 December 2025**. Retained HTML explicitly separates `datePublished` **2025-12-18T18:17:32Z** from `dateModified` **2026-07-06T16:30:34Z**, and the posted-date elements display both dates. The September 2026 captured wording cannot be assumed identical to the original December wording; no version comparison was acquired. Do not assign an exact implementation date from those page dates alone.\n\nSource: IAS announcement (see source references) full substantive announcement, especially the paragraph beginning its continuous-improvement explanation. Full body was reader-read; original HTML date elements and JSON-LD were locally inspected. This is distinct from Oracle's announced 30 September 2024 service end in the prior accepted packet, and from current GDI research products.\n\n## Historical funding disclosure present in the same evidence\n\nFON0071's **GDI and Government Funding** section says GDI had received no UK government funding since 2022; describes FCDO Russia-unit Countering Disinformation and Media Development work in 2018–2022 to develop large-scale detection and country studies; and says the supporting grant expired in March 2023. The receipt-period statement and later grant-expiry date are not a self-evident contradiction. It also attributes then-current resources to private foundations, commercial data licensing and a small EU Horizon Europe grant. This is a historical recipient disclosure, not donor-side confirmation, acquired conditions, proof of payment dates or government approval of a particular rating. No funding genealogy was pursued.\n\n## Discriminating gap and stopping boundary\n\nThe evidence now defeats the broad claim that no publisher appeal was publicly described. It also leaves a distinct question unanswered: **what obliges a data recipient to stop using or replace a successfully challenged signal?** GDI may revise a rating while an advertiser independently declines the inventory; the acquired documents do not reconcile those steps or prove any such instance occurred.\n\nThe most useful expected instruments are held by GDI and its relevant licensee: the dated publisher-review procedure behind the 2024 form; a service-specific notice or licence annex defining corrections, updates and deletion; and an actual recipient instruction/acknowledgement following a resolved rating. IAS's versioned discontinuation/migration specification would test its broader no-continuing-effect statement. These are missing records, not proof that no rules or corrections exist.\n\nThe 2019 GDI methodology PDF reader returned an unsafe-open non-retryable error and was closed without retry. It was not used as methodological evidence. The previously closed 2022 policy PDF and Jounce routes were not reopened even where search results resurfaced them. No named-site score audit, customer system, operational list, form submission, account, or harmful-content endpoint was accessed. The packet closes at three read primary records; acquisition and custody details are in `recourse-captures.json`.\n",
        "file": "research/gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings",
        "title": "FCDO–GDI remit: donor funding and review are documented; reuse rights are not",
        "description": "Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026 at three substantive donor-side records: written answer 149420, the CDMD 2022–2023 programme summary, and one September 2022 spending entry. The programme original is retained; the parliamentary answer and spending entry have scoped official-reader derivatives. The findings do not identify a signed GDI grant agreement, ",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026 at three substantive donor-side records: written answer 149420, the CDMD 2022–2023 programme summary, and one September 2022 spending entry. The programme original is retained; the parliamentary answer and spending entry have scoped official-reader derivatives. The findings do not identify a signed GDI grant agreement, its grant number, or clauses controlling publication, intellectual property or commercial reuse.</p>\n<h2 id=\"specific-funding-and-review-statement\">Specific funding and review statement</h2>\n<p>In <strong>written answer 149420, answered 24 February 2023</strong>, FCDO minister Leo Docherty says the Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme had funded GDI since 2019 <strong>for activities outside the US</strong>. He reports <strong>GBP 1,999,026 between 2019 and 2022</strong>, with a further <strong>GBP 600,797 in the then-current financial year</strong>. These are donor-reported amounts provided, not an independently reconciled payment ledger or merely a future award announcement. The answer does not identify individual disbursements or the precise period boundaries of the first amount. Neither amount should be added to the separate spending entry below.</p>\n<p>Asked about discussions, the answer says there <strong>“will have been frequent contact”</strong> between the programme team and GDI, and regular performance reports and reviews. This describes the department&#x27;s expected programme relationship; it supplies neither an actual meeting count nor the reports, instructions or review decisions. It does not establish a right to approve a particular rating, selection of a particular publisher, or customer purchasing decisions. Its explanation places GDI&#x27;s technological work in the context of countering Russian disinformation.</p>\n<p>Source: [official answer 149420](http[local research file] question and entire answer; reader lines 24–37, date line 32. Original GET returned 403 and was closed. <code>fcdo-answer149420.reader.txt</code> retains the working official-reader text; the retained error HTML is not substantive source content.</p>\n<p>The outside-US wording is a consequential statement of <strong>funded-activity scope</strong>. Without the agreement, it is not a demonstrated contractual prohibition on every later use of knowledge, code or data in US markets. Conversely, commercial availability elsewhere does not show that FCDO commissioned US exclusions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"programme-identity-is-not-the-individual-grant-identity\">Programme identity is not the individual grant identity</h2>\n<p>The official <strong>Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023</strong> gives identifier <strong>CSSF-05-000006</strong>, a seven-year programme running <strong>April 2016–March 2023</strong>, with FCDO and Cabinet Office partners. It identifies the <strong>Baltic States, Central Europe and Eastern Neighbourhood</strong> as the programme&#x27;s operating region. Its FY 2022–2023 allocation is <strong>GBP 12 million ODA and GBP 21.1 million non-ODA</strong>. These are programme allocations; they are not GDI&#x27;s income, an additional GDI award or demonstrated expenditure.</p>\n<p>Its component table covers independent media/civil society, vulnerable audiences, partner capabilities, strategic communications with monitoring/evaluation/research, and programme delivery. Most implementers and contract dates are recorded generically as Various; the partner-capability component lists HMG and 1 April 2022–31 March 2023. <strong>GDI is not named in the summary.</strong> The objectives include analysing and exposing information operations, strengthening independent media and audience resilience, and international coordination. Expected results are aims, not evidence they occurred.</p>\n<p>This summary establishes the parent programme&#x27;s identity and strategic envelope. It cannot allocate GDI to a component, establish its country list, or supply a GDI-specific deliverable or approval condition. Its duration also cannot substitute for the individual grant term even though its March 2023 endpoint is consistent with the recipient&#x27;s reported grant expiry.</p>\n<p>Source: [original ODT](http[local research file] entire document text, particularly identity/duration/budget fields, component table and support/results headings. Retained <code>fcdo-cdmd2022-23.odt</code>, SHA-256 <code>c384de3682c5328fdb40642321b3733fcfcae23b6c0f7aee183e2785b9d5bc94</code>. Read from its XML text; no rendered-page or visual claim. Metadata says three pages and 4 November 2024 creation/modification. The [official attachment index](http[local research file] was published <strong>30 January 2025</strong>. This is a retrospectively published summary, not proof that these exact bytes were the governing instrument in 2022. The index&#x27;s general sensitivity rationale for withholding some programme detail is not proof that a specific GDI clause was withheld.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-dated-ledger-entry-clarifies-the-accounting-boundary\">A dated ledger entry clarifies the accounting boundary</h2>\n<p>FCDO&#x27;s <strong>September 2022 spending-over-GBP-25,000 publication</strong> contains this selected row:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Field</th>\n<th>Recorded value</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Department / entity</td>\n<td>FCDO / FCDO</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GL.Date</td>\n<td>05/09/2022</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Unique.Identifier</td>\n<td>300,000,130,671,861</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Invoice.Line.Number</td>\n<td>1</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Supplier.Name</td>\n<td>GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Invoice.GBP.Line.AMT</td>\n<td>GBP 130,506.00</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Category</td>\n<td>Project Management</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>This is a donor ledger/invoice-line record with a general-ledger date, not a recipient bank statement or proof of the exact settlement date. The row supplies no grant/programme identifier, deliverable or country. Its generic category must not be converted into an invented project-management contract. The identifier is a transaction-record identifier, not the grant number. The selected row is not a full annual reconciliation or evidence of the last payment.</p>\n<p>Source: [official CSV preview](http[local research file] header and sole matched GDI row, reader lines 58–62 and 741. Preview says updated <strong>28 November 2024</strong>, distinct from the September 2022 ledger period. <code>fcdo-spend-sept2022.reader.txt</code> retains these scoped passages. The CSV download reader failed; no original CSV was retained or another transport attempted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"periods-reuse-and-what-remains-undecided\">Periods, reuse, and what remains undecided</h2>\n<p>The prior accepted FON0071 recipient disclosure says no UK funding since 2022, while its grant expired in March 2023. A September 2022 ledger date lies in both calendar 2022 and UK financial year 2022–2023. This demonstrates why the labels can coexist; it does <strong>not</strong> reconcile the two parliamentary amounts to receipts, allocate this row to either amount, or prove an exact last-funding date. The donor answer and the recipient account also describe programme participation using different start-period formulations; no unsupported reconciliation is imposed.</p>\n<p>Read together with the earlier accepted product and recipient evidence, public funding of GDI&#x27;s work and a commercial licensing operation are both documented at their respective source strengths. The missing causal instrument is what assets the commissioned work created and what reuse rights attached. The acquired records do not establish that donor-funded code or classifications were the same assets later licensed to Oracle or another buyer. Neither a tightly confined non-reusable commission nor unrestricted commercial reuse is proved.</p>\n<p>The next useful record would be FCDO&#x27;s executed GDI award/variation and deliverable schedule under CDMD, with the financial schedule, acceptance/review rights and IP/data/publication provisions; corresponding performance returns would distinguish reserved rights from exercised instructions. FCDO and GDI are the expected holders. A supplier-licence annex would then be needed to join any retained assets to commercial use. No request or contact has been made.</p>\n<h2 id=\"search-and-access-limits\">Search and access limits</h2>\n<p>A finite official-domain search covered parliamentary answers, GOV.UK programme disclosures, DevTracker and exact GDI/grant-agreement/IP terms. Answer 171377 was surfaced for country scope, but its ordinary reader failed and direct GET returned 403; the route was closed and the indexed answer was not promoted to body-read evidence. Other spending months, programme versions, third-party discussions and government-country studies remain discovery only. Previously closed GDI/Jounce routes were not revisited. Full transport, read scopes and hashes are in <code>fcdo-captures.json</code>; no case, graph or publication was changed.</p>",
        "path": "gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09/fcdo-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer",
          "w32-gdi-s-cdmd",
          "w32-gdi-s-fcdoledger"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026 at three substantive donor-side records: written answer 149420, the CDMD 2022–2023 programme summary, and one September 2022 spending entry. The programme original is retained; the parliamentary answer and spending entry have scoped official-reader derivatives. The findings do not identify a signed GDI grant agreement, its grant number, or clauses controlling publication, intellectual property or commercial reuse.\n\n## Specific funding and review statement\n\nIn **written answer 149420, answered 24 February 2023**, FCDO minister Leo Docherty says the Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme had funded GDI since 2019 **for activities outside the US**. He reports **GBP 1,999,026 between 2019 and 2022**, with a further **GBP 600,797 in the then-current financial year**. These are donor-reported amounts provided, not an independently reconciled payment ledger or merely a future award announcement. The answer does not identify individual disbursements or the precise period boundaries of the first amount. Neither amount should be added to the separate spending entry below.\n\nAsked about discussions, the answer says there **“will have been frequent contact”** between the programme team and GDI, and regular performance reports and reviews. This describes the department's expected programme relationship; it supplies neither an actual meeting count nor the reports, instructions or review decisions. It does not establish a right to approve a particular rating, selection of a particular publisher, or customer purchasing decisions. Its explanation places GDI's technological work in the context of countering Russian disinformation.\n\nSource: official answer 149420 (see source references) question and entire answer; reader lines 24–37, date line 32. Original GET returned 403 and was closed. `fcdo-answer149420.reader.txt` retains the working official-reader text; the retained error HTML is not substantive source content.\n\nThe outside-US wording is a consequential statement of **funded-activity scope**. Without the agreement, it is not a demonstrated contractual prohibition on every later use of knowledge, code or data in US markets. Conversely, commercial availability elsewhere does not show that FCDO commissioned US exclusions.\n\n## Programme identity is not the individual grant identity\n\nThe official **Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023** gives identifier **CSSF-05-000006**, a seven-year programme running **April 2016–March 2023**, with FCDO and Cabinet Office partners. It identifies the **Baltic States, Central Europe and Eastern Neighbourhood** as the programme's operating region. Its FY 2022–2023 allocation is **GBP 12 million ODA and GBP 21.1 million non-ODA**. These are programme allocations; they are not GDI's income, an additional GDI award or demonstrated expenditure.\n\nIts component table covers independent media/civil society, vulnerable audiences, partner capabilities, strategic communications with monitoring/evaluation/research, and programme delivery. Most implementers and contract dates are recorded generically as Various; the partner-capability component lists HMG and 1 April 2022–31 March 2023. **GDI is not named in the summary.** The objectives include analysing and exposing information operations, strengthening independent media and audience resilience, and international coordination. Expected results are aims, not evidence they occurred.\n\nThis summary establishes the parent programme's identity and strategic envelope. It cannot allocate GDI to a component, establish its country list, or supply a GDI-specific deliverable or approval condition. Its duration also cannot substitute for the individual grant term even though its March 2023 endpoint is consistent with the recipient's reported grant expiry.\n\nSource: original ODT (see source references) entire document text, particularly identity/duration/budget fields, component table and support/results headings. Retained `fcdo-cdmd2022-23.odt`, SHA-256 `c384de3682c5328fdb40642321b3733fcfcae23b6c0f7aee183e2785b9d5bc94`. Read from its XML text; no rendered-page or visual claim. Metadata says three pages and 4 November 2024 creation/modification. The official attachment index (see source references) was published **30 January 2025**. This is a retrospectively published summary, not proof that these exact bytes were the governing instrument in 2022. The index's general sensitivity rationale for withholding some programme detail is not proof that a specific GDI clause was withheld.\n\n## A dated ledger entry clarifies the accounting boundary\n\nFCDO's **September 2022 spending-over-GBP-25,000 publication** contains this selected row:\n\n| Field | Recorded value |\n| --- | --- |\n| Department / entity | FCDO / FCDO |\n| GL.Date | 05/09/2022 |\n| Unique.Identifier | 300,000,130,671,861 |\n| Invoice.Line.Number | 1 |\n| Supplier.Name | GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX |\n| Invoice.GBP.Line.AMT | GBP 130,506.00 |\n| Category | Project Management |\n\nThis is a donor ledger/invoice-line record with a general-ledger date, not a recipient bank statement or proof of the exact settlement date. The row supplies no grant/programme identifier, deliverable or country. Its generic category must not be converted into an invented project-management contract. The identifier is a transaction-record identifier, not the grant number. The selected row is not a full annual reconciliation or evidence of the last payment.\n\nSource: official CSV preview (see source references) header and sole matched GDI row, reader lines 58–62 and 741. Preview says updated **28 November 2024**, distinct from the September 2022 ledger period. `fcdo-spend-sept2022.reader.txt` retains these scoped passages. The CSV download reader failed; no original CSV was retained or another transport attempted.\n\n## Periods, reuse, and what remains undecided\n\nThe prior accepted FON0071 recipient disclosure says no UK funding since 2022, while its grant expired in March 2023. A September 2022 ledger date lies in both calendar 2022 and UK financial year 2022–2023. This demonstrates why the labels can coexist; it does **not** reconcile the two parliamentary amounts to receipts, allocate this row to either amount, or prove an exact last-funding date. The donor answer and the recipient account also describe programme participation using different start-period formulations; no unsupported reconciliation is imposed.\n\nRead together with the earlier accepted product and recipient evidence, public funding of GDI's work and a commercial licensing operation are both documented at their respective source strengths. The missing causal instrument is what assets the commissioned work created and what reuse rights attached. The acquired records do not establish that donor-funded code or classifications were the same assets later licensed to Oracle or another buyer. Neither a tightly confined non-reusable commission nor unrestricted commercial reuse is proved.\n\nThe next useful record would be FCDO's executed GDI award/variation and deliverable schedule under CDMD, with the financial schedule, acceptance/review rights and IP/data/publication provisions; corresponding performance returns would distinguish reserved rights from exercised instructions. FCDO and GDI are the expected holders. A supplier-licence annex would then be needed to join any retained assets to commercial use. No request or contact has been made.\n\n## Search and access limits\n\nA finite official-domain search covered parliamentary answers, GOV.UK programme disclosures, DevTracker and exact GDI/grant-agreement/IP terms. Answer 171377 was surfaced for country scope, but its ordinary reader failed and direct GET returned 403; the route was closed and the indexed answer was not promoted to body-read evidence. Other spending months, programme versions, third-party discussions and government-country studies remain discovery only. Previously closed GDI/Jounce routes were not revisited. Full transport, read scopes and hashes are in `fcdo-captures.json`; no case, graph or publication was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings",
        "title": "GDI's Horizon role: a named research contribution, with reuse rights still missing",
        "description": "Closed bounded acquisition, 9 September 2026. Three primary originals retained; one deliverable read selectively. This note makes no finding about the current operation of an advertising exclusion list.",
        "html": "<p>Closed bounded acquisition, 9 September 2026. Three primary originals retained; one deliverable read selectively. This note makes no finding about the current operation of an advertising exclusion list.</p>\n<h2 id=\"project-and-recipient-identity\">Project and recipient identity</h2>\n<p>The identified project is <strong>AI4TRUST, grant 101070190</strong>, running <strong>1 January 2023–28 February 2026</strong>, with an EC signature dated <strong>6 December 2022</strong>. CORDIS, last updated <strong>17 June 2026</strong>, labels it closed. The registered German participant is <strong>GDI GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX GUGHAFTUNGSBESCHRANKT</strong>. Its published net EU contribution and total cost are each <strong>EUR 385,275</strong>. The whole-project contribution/cost is <strong>EUR 5,950,682.50</strong> and must not become GDI income. Fondazione Bruno Kessler coordinates the Horizon research action. [CORDIS, project header, programme and German GDI participant entry](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>GDI appears in the participant section, separate from the section describing partners that do not sign the grant. This supports a funded participant characterization rather than an associated-partner or UK-guarantee claim. The financial field is the registry&#x27;s published EU contribution; no dated transfer ledger was acquired. Neither ownership of the German entity by UK Disinformation Index Ltd nor an IP transfer between them is established. The existing UKRI identity in the case is not joined to this project.</p>\n<p>This is a confirmed GDI Horizon project active during the April 2024 FON0071 disclosure. It is the strongest identified match, <strong>not an explicit identification of that disclosure&#x27;s unnamed grant or proof that it was GDI&#x27;s only Horizon project</strong>. The earlier statement and this record are distinct sources with different specificity.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-entered-the-project-and-what-gdi-says-emerged\">What entered the project, and what GDI says emerged</h2>\n<p>D2.1, submitted <strong>1 November 2023</strong>, records coordinator and quality-manager review (PDF 2–3). Its selected definitions distinguish project emphasis on intent from GDI&#x27;s risk-based alternative (11–12). GDI&#x27;s described NLP method uses analyst-coded examples and semantic matching to flag websites for human review (34–35). Existing GDI keyword lists contributed to the project&#x27;s search seeds (55). Planned collection is purpose-limited, and consortium interface access depends on data-sharing agreements (65). The internal GDI policies mentioned at 69 are not reproduced. [D2.1 original](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The document&#x27;s internal acceptance/submission labels do not prove Commission acceptance. Query refinement is not publisher recourse. The NLP licensing guidance crossing pages 68–69 is introduced for NCSR-D/FBK; it must not be assigned to GDI as an executed licence. This is a design record, not a runtime audit.</p>\n<p>In its <strong>20 April 2026</strong> retrospective, GDI reports developing the decision-support system within the Monitoring Dashboard: combined detection signals, trained using consortium fact-checker annotations, surface risk patterns for human review. It also requests faster Article 40 vetting, mandatory platform API compatibility with approved third-party detection systems, and researcher audit access. [GDI retrospective, “What AI4TRUST delivered” and “Recommendations”](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>That is a meaningful <strong>reported research contribution → request for institutional access</strong>. The platform refusals described in the same article remain GDI&#x27;s account: the applications and responses were not acquired. The article is not a legal instrument, award of access, or proof that a platform implemented the requested compatibility.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-evidence-does-and-does-not-join\">What the evidence does and does not join</h2>\n<p>The strongest actual knowledge-flow evidence runs <strong>from GDI&#x27;s existing resources into funded methodology</strong>. The retrospective supplies a later, attributed output claim. No selected record identifies that output with DEL, the former Oracle segment, IAS&#x27;s former input, or the prospective OHMD. Similar risk terminology does not establish shared code, training data, licences, recipients or commercial deployment. Nothing here establishes that FCDO commissioned these inputs or directed subsequent exclusions.</p>\n<p>For later integration, useful relations are the EU contribution recorded against the German participant; that participant&#x27;s research role; GDI&#x27;s pre-existing resource contribution to D2.1; the documented internal report review; the attributed Monitoring Dashboard contribution; and GDI&#x27;s request for new access obligations. Keep the April 2024 grant match qualified, financial allocation separate from cash, and requested authority separate from an awarded right. No graph edits were made.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival explanation is ordinary consortium research using participants&#x27; prior expertise, followed by advocacy about research access. The present records support that account at least as well as a theory of publicly funded commercial exclusion infrastructure. The latter requires an additional documented transfer or use.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-frontier-and-custody\">Finite frontier and custody</h2>\n<p>The highest-value missing record is the <strong>AI4TRUST consortium agreement&#x27;s GDI background/results and exploitation or access-rights schedules</strong>, or a specific licence tying its decision-support output to a named commercial product. Likely holders are the project coordinator and relevant GDI legal participant. D2.1 also points to data-management/platform specifications, but this run did not acquire another deliverable or treat generic grant rules as exercised powers. A grant accession/payment record would settle finer legal and money-state questions; a corporate record would settle the UK/German relationship. The named annotation codebook and final decision-support thresholds/validation are further precise records needed to test classification choices. The codebook and internal policies are expected records, not evidence of bias. These are reopening conditions, not claims that the documents do not exist.</p>\n<p>Originals: <code>horizon-cordis.html</code>, <code>horizon-gdi2026.html</code>, <code>horizon-d21.pdf</code>. <code>horizon-cordis.full-dom.txt</code> preserves header/date fields omitted by the narrower main-text extraction. The 90-page PDF was not read in full: text scope is PDF 1–5, 9–12, 34–35, 53–55, 60–65, 68–69. Images actually viewed: 2, 3, 11, 35, 55, 65. PDF 2 visually emphasizes Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission; its boxes are not filled checkmarks. No Commission approval is inferred. No keyword annex, live dataset or operational interface was used.</p>\n<p>The PDF reader returned an Internal Error; one ordinary GET then retained the original successfully. CORDIS and GDI originals also returned 200. No further acquisition route was opened. Exact files, hashes, dates and source scopes are in <code>horizon-captures.json</code>; transport evidence remains in <code>horizon-transport.json</code>.</p>",
        "path": "gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09/horizon-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-cordis",
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch",
          "w32-gdi-s-d21"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed bounded acquisition, 9 September 2026. Three primary originals retained; one deliverable read selectively. This note makes no finding about the current operation of an advertising exclusion list.\n\n## Project and recipient identity\n\nThe identified project is **AI4TRUST, grant 101070190**, running **1 January 2023–28 February 2026**, with an EC signature dated **6 December 2022**. CORDIS, last updated **17 June 2026**, labels it closed. The registered German participant is **GDI GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX GUGHAFTUNGSBESCHRANKT**. Its published net EU contribution and total cost are each **EUR 385,275**. The whole-project contribution/cost is **EUR 5,950,682.50** and must not become GDI income. Fondazione Bruno Kessler coordinates the Horizon research action. CORDIS, project header, programme and German GDI participant entry (see source references)\n\nGDI appears in the participant section, separate from the section describing partners that do not sign the grant. This supports a funded participant characterization rather than an associated-partner or UK-guarantee claim. The financial field is the registry's published EU contribution; no dated transfer ledger was acquired. Neither ownership of the German entity by UK Disinformation Index Ltd nor an IP transfer between them is established. The existing UKRI identity in the case is not joined to this project.\n\nThis is a confirmed GDI Horizon project active during the April 2024 FON0071 disclosure. It is the strongest identified match, **not an explicit identification of that disclosure's unnamed grant or proof that it was GDI's only Horizon project**. The earlier statement and this record are distinct sources with different specificity.\n\n## What entered the project, and what GDI says emerged\n\nD2.1, submitted **1 November 2023**, records coordinator and quality-manager review (PDF 2–3). Its selected definitions distinguish project emphasis on intent from GDI's risk-based alternative (11–12). GDI's described NLP method uses analyst-coded examples and semantic matching to flag websites for human review (34–35). Existing GDI keyword lists contributed to the project's search seeds (55). Planned collection is purpose-limited, and consortium interface access depends on data-sharing agreements (65). The internal GDI policies mentioned at 69 are not reproduced. D2.1 original (see source references)\n\nThe document's internal acceptance/submission labels do not prove Commission acceptance. Query refinement is not publisher recourse. The NLP licensing guidance crossing pages 68–69 is introduced for NCSR-D/FBK; it must not be assigned to GDI as an executed licence. This is a design record, not a runtime audit.\n\nIn its **20 April 2026** retrospective, GDI reports developing the decision-support system within the Monitoring Dashboard: combined detection signals, trained using consortium fact-checker annotations, surface risk patterns for human review. It also requests faster Article 40 vetting, mandatory platform API compatibility with approved third-party detection systems, and researcher audit access. GDI retrospective, “What AI4TRUST delivered” and “Recommendations” (see source references)\n\nThat is a meaningful **reported research contribution → request for institutional access**. The platform refusals described in the same article remain GDI's account: the applications and responses were not acquired. The article is not a legal instrument, award of access, or proof that a platform implemented the requested compatibility.\n\n## What the evidence does and does not join\n\nThe strongest actual knowledge-flow evidence runs **from GDI's existing resources into funded methodology**. The retrospective supplies a later, attributed output claim. No selected record identifies that output with DEL, the former Oracle segment, IAS's former input, or the prospective OHMD. Similar risk terminology does not establish shared code, training data, licences, recipients or commercial deployment. Nothing here establishes that FCDO commissioned these inputs or directed subsequent exclusions.\n\nFor later integration, useful relations are the EU contribution recorded against the German participant; that participant's research role; GDI's pre-existing resource contribution to D2.1; the documented internal report review; the attributed Monitoring Dashboard contribution; and GDI's request for new access obligations. Keep the April 2024 grant match qualified, financial allocation separate from cash, and requested authority separate from an awarded right. No graph edits were made.\n\nThe strongest rival explanation is ordinary consortium research using participants' prior expertise, followed by advocacy about research access. The present records support that account at least as well as a theory of publicly funded commercial exclusion infrastructure. The latter requires an additional documented transfer or use.\n\n## Finite frontier and custody\n\nThe highest-value missing record is the **AI4TRUST consortium agreement's GDI background/results and exploitation or access-rights schedules**, or a specific licence tying its decision-support output to a named commercial product. Likely holders are the project coordinator and relevant GDI legal participant. D2.1 also points to data-management/platform specifications, but this run did not acquire another deliverable or treat generic grant rules as exercised powers. A grant accession/payment record would settle finer legal and money-state questions; a corporate record would settle the UK/German relationship. The named annotation codebook and final decision-support thresholds/validation are further precise records needed to test classification choices. The codebook and internal policies are expected records, not evidence of bias. These are reopening conditions, not claims that the documents do not exist.\n\nOriginals: `horizon-cordis.html`, `horizon-gdi2026.html`, `horizon-d21.pdf`. `horizon-cordis.full-dom.txt` preserves header/date fields omitted by the narrower main-text extraction. The 90-page PDF was not read in full: text scope is PDF 1–5, 9–12, 34–35, 53–55, 60–65, 68–69. Images actually viewed: 2, 3, 11, 35, 55, 65. PDF 2 visually emphasizes Public, UCAM reviewer, Coordinator accepted and Ready for submission; its boxes are not filled checkmarks. No Commission approval is inferred. No keyword annex, live dataset or operational interface was used.\n\nThe PDF reader returned an Internal Error; one ordinary GET then retained the original successfully. CORDIS and GDI originals also returned 200. No further acquisition route was opened. Exact files, hashes, dates and source scopes are in `horizon-captures.json`; transport evidence remains in `horizon-transport.json`.\n",
        "file": "research/gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism",
        "title": "GDI advertising-risk mechanism: a documented historical channel, with a definite service-end boundary",
        "description": "Closed acquisition: 9 September 2026. Three primary originals were retained. This packet concerns classification, distribution and recourse; Oak funding is handled separately in oak-gdi-support.md. It establishes an advertised GDI-to-Oracle product route in a 2024 guide, followed by an official Oracle service-end policy. It does not establish current deliver",
        "html": "<p>Closed acquisition: 9 September 2026. Three primary originals were retained. This packet concerns classification, distribution and recourse; Oak funding is handled separately in <code>oak-gdi-support.md</code>. It establishes an advertised GDI-to-Oracle product route in a 2024 guide, followed by an official Oracle service-end policy. It does not establish current delivery through Oracle, an advertiser&#x27;s actual configuration, or a measured loss of publisher revenue.</p>\n<h2 id=\"exact-product-handoff\">Exact product handoff</h2>\n<p>Oracle&#x27;s 2024 <em>Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide</em> describes segments that advertisers can use to target suitable contexts or avoid unsuitable ones. Its introduction says Oracle maintains its own contextual segments through an editorial team and describes the disinformation solution as powered by its GDI partnership. The decisive supplier row on PDF/printed page 129 identifies <strong>Disinformation protection from GDI</strong>, machine name <strong><code>gi_gdi_pfi</code></strong>. Oracle attributes the high-risk news-website ratings to GDI&#x27;s combination of machine learning and expert human review. This supports GDI supplying a classification input and Oracle packaging it as an advertising segment; it does not show a particular advertiser selecting it, a bid being rejected, or a publisher&#x27;s income changing.</p>\n<p>The general branded-context introduction on PDF 128 describes third-party data used for targeting or avoiding matching content. The selected reading does not establish the executed licence, data fields, update cadence, downstream customer list or payment terms. Oracle&#x27;s separate Floor-tier table on PDF 3 says that tier is blocked by default without a toggle. Its comparison to URL-based <code>gv_pfi</code> construction is <strong>not an explicit default rule for the different GDI segment <code>gi_gdi_pfi</code></strong>. The guide therefore cannot support universal or non-overridable activation of the GDI segment. A PDF 10 text-layer row is ambiguous and was not used to assign the GDI identifier or a default.</p>\n<p>Source: [Oracle guide](http[local research file] PDF 1–3, PDF 128 branded-context introduction, PDF 129 entire GDI table. Page 3 and page 129 were visually checked from retained original bytes. The document bears copyright 2024; metadata records creation 30 May and modification 3 June 2024, which are not independently established publication or deployment dates.</p>\n<h2 id=\"oracles-subsequent-service-end-policy-changes-the-time-claim\">Oracle&#x27;s subsequent service-end policy changes the time claim</h2>\n<p>Oracle&#x27;s <em>Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions</em>, <strong>12 August 2024, Version 3.0</strong>, explicitly includes Contextual Intelligence and supporting integrations in the services ending <strong>30 September 2024</strong>. It says Oracle would take no new advertising agreements or renewals, end data-provider relationships, and terminate access even when an order extended beyond that date. This is a published provider policy, not evidence from a runtime test. It is sufficient to prevent presenting the historical guide as a current Oracle delivery channel.</p>\n<p>The same FAQ makes the residual boundary concrete. Rights to use previously supplied data depend on the product service description. Reporting and payment obligations may continue while data remains in use, and Oracle says payments for post-service data usage follow executed provider contracts. These are general provisions, not proof that GDI had a particular continuing licence, was paid after the end date, or that every stored classification was deleted. The FAQ itself says it is informational and does not form contractual obligations. The executed GDI/Oracle agreement and relevant service description remain unacquired.</p>\n<p>Source: [Oracle EOL FAQ](http[local research file] PDF 1 date/version; PDF 2 product and end-date table; PDF 3 termination, prior-data and privacy questions; PDF 4 continuing reporting/provider-payment questions; PDF 5 legal qualification. All five pages were text-read; PDF 2–4 were visually checked.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-current-gdi-page-doesand-does-notestablish\">What the current GDI page does—and does not—establish</h2>\n<p>The [current About page](http[local research file] observed 9 September 2026, frames GDI&#x27;s work as mapping revenues and producing evidence for policymakers and industry. Its definition extends beyond individual false statements: harmful, false or misleading adversarial narratives may target at-risk groups, current scientific consensus, democracy, civic institutions and governing bodies, including through contextual omissions. This is the current page&#x27;s classificatory scope; the selected sources do not establish that the same criteria governed the historical DEL or Oracle segment. Its statement that it accepts no funding from media companies or technology platforms is also a current self-description. Historic licensing alone neither resolves nor establishes a contradiction without the relevant fee/payment definitions and dates. It describes the Online Harms Monetisation Dashboard in prospective language: it <strong>will</strong> estimate revenues across the open web and social platforms. This is a stated product direction, not proof of a deployed dashboard. Its approximately USD 200 million annual redirection figure is GDI&#x27;s estimate attributed to its and partner organisations&#x27; work, not an independently tested outcome here. The page neither confirms current DEL distribution through another supplier nor establishes that all such distribution ended.</p>\n<p>Its invitations to peers and academics to critique methodology are not an affected publisher&#x27;s appeal instrument. The three selected records do not disclose a publisher notification entitlement, reasons/evidence procedure, correction or removal deadline, independent appeal, or propagation of corrected ratings to customers. Those instruments are <strong>unacquired</strong>, not proved nonexistent. Oracle&#x27;s privacy opt-out/DSAR continuity during wind-down concerns a different process and cannot fill this gap.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-directional-relationships-and-limits\">Candidate directional relationships and limits</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Direction</th>\n<th>Supported relationship</th>\n<th>Stage / boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>GDI → Oracle Contextual Intelligence</td>\n<td>Supplies high-risk website ratings packaged in <code>gi_gdi_pfi</code></td>\n<td>Oracle&#x27;s 2024 product description; no executed licence or customer activation inspected</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oracle segment → advertisers</td>\n<td>Offers a classification input for contextual targeting/avoidance</td>\n<td>Product capability; actual selection, default and restriction effects unproved for this segment</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oracle → advertising customers and integrations</td>\n<td>Announces end of Contextual Intelligence service/access on 30 September 2024</td>\n<td>Dated official provider policy; retained-data rights depend on unacquired instruments</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oracle → data providers</td>\n<td>Describes continuing payment calculation under executed contracts for post-EOL usage</td>\n<td>General policy only; no GDI-specific amount, payment or continuing use established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GDI → OHMD</td>\n<td>Describes a forthcoming revenue-estimation product</td>\n<td>Current stated plan, not verified operational deployment</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The strongest rival to a present-tense exclusion-network account is documented channel retirement combined with an unresolved current distribution route. Conversely, the retirement notice cannot establish that historical signals had no continuing use. A high-value next record would be the historical GDI–Oracle licence/service description or a current distribution agreement specifying publisher review, update/deletion propagation and recipient discretion. No further acquisition is undertaken in this packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-bounded-failures\">Custody and bounded failures</h2>\n<p>Originals: <code>mechanism-gdi-about.html</code> (SHA-256 <code>7e26f1638af8a92ea94193ca8d4011d6735dacf6f56716d7afd63a31fdbc1e1f</code>); <code>mechanism-oracle-guide2024.pdf</code> (<code>47b531a6967b09c9d9fd714cf209a7cbb49263686c1db2405399a71ffe6b86da</code>); <code>mechanism-oracle-eol2024.pdf</code> (<code>179f16108f5f783a79092c4b4835e4100557cd3a04fb0c96fe92bf5ee0ca5f2a</code>). Full extraction of the 129-page guide was retained, but only the scoped passages above were substantively read. One large local display was truncated; it is not counted as a full read. Exact transport, derivative/image hashes and reading scopes are in <code>mechanism-captures.json</code>.</p>\n<p>The indexed GDI 14 April 2022 Jounce announcement redirected to the current blog on ordinary web-reader opening; the historical article was not acquired or used to create a partnership edge. An indexed 2022 GDI policy PDF returned InternalError in the web reader; the parent replaced that planned third record with Oracle&#x27;s consequential end-of-service policy, and that PDF route was closed without another attempt. No secondary controversy accounts, list entries, harmful-content endpoints or operational customer systems were read. The root&#x27;s Oak article is a separate source and was not duplicated.</p>",
        "path": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09/gdi-mechanism.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-gdiabout",
          "w32-gdi-s-oracle",
          "w32-gdi-s-oracleend"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed acquisition: 9 September 2026. Three primary originals were retained. This packet concerns classification, distribution and recourse; Oak funding is handled separately in `oak-gdi-support.md`. It establishes an advertised GDI-to-Oracle product route in a 2024 guide, followed by an official Oracle service-end policy. It does not establish current delivery through Oracle, an advertiser's actual configuration, or a measured loss of publisher revenue.\n\n## Exact product handoff\n\nOracle's 2024 *Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide* describes segments that advertisers can use to target suitable contexts or avoid unsuitable ones. Its introduction says Oracle maintains its own contextual segments through an editorial team and describes the disinformation solution as powered by its GDI partnership. The decisive supplier row on PDF/printed page 129 identifies **Disinformation protection from GDI**, machine name **`gi_gdi_pfi`**. Oracle attributes the high-risk news-website ratings to GDI's combination of machine learning and expert human review. This supports GDI supplying a classification input and Oracle packaging it as an advertising segment; it does not show a particular advertiser selecting it, a bid being rejected, or a publisher's income changing.\n\nThe general branded-context introduction on PDF 128 describes third-party data used for targeting or avoiding matching content. The selected reading does not establish the executed licence, data fields, update cadence, downstream customer list or payment terms. Oracle's separate Floor-tier table on PDF 3 says that tier is blocked by default without a toggle. Its comparison to URL-based `gv_pfi` construction is **not an explicit default rule for the different GDI segment `gi_gdi_pfi`**. The guide therefore cannot support universal or non-overridable activation of the GDI segment. A PDF 10 text-layer row is ambiguous and was not used to assign the GDI identifier or a default.\n\nSource: Oracle guide (see source references) PDF 1–3, PDF 128 branded-context introduction, PDF 129 entire GDI table. Page 3 and page 129 were visually checked from retained original bytes. The document bears copyright 2024; metadata records creation 30 May and modification 3 June 2024, which are not independently established publication or deployment dates.\n\n## Oracle's subsequent service-end policy changes the time claim\n\nOracle's *Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions*, **12 August 2024, Version 3.0**, explicitly includes Contextual Intelligence and supporting integrations in the services ending **30 September 2024**. It says Oracle would take no new advertising agreements or renewals, end data-provider relationships, and terminate access even when an order extended beyond that date. This is a published provider policy, not evidence from a runtime test. It is sufficient to prevent presenting the historical guide as a current Oracle delivery channel.\n\nThe same FAQ makes the residual boundary concrete. Rights to use previously supplied data depend on the product service description. Reporting and payment obligations may continue while data remains in use, and Oracle says payments for post-service data usage follow executed provider contracts. These are general provisions, not proof that GDI had a particular continuing licence, was paid after the end date, or that every stored classification was deleted. The FAQ itself says it is informational and does not form contractual obligations. The executed GDI/Oracle agreement and relevant service description remain unacquired.\n\nSource: Oracle EOL FAQ (see source references) PDF 1 date/version; PDF 2 product and end-date table; PDF 3 termination, prior-data and privacy questions; PDF 4 continuing reporting/provider-payment questions; PDF 5 legal qualification. All five pages were text-read; PDF 2–4 were visually checked.\n\n## What the current GDI page does—and does not—establish\n\nThe current About page (see source references) observed 9 September 2026, frames GDI's work as mapping revenues and producing evidence for policymakers and industry. Its definition extends beyond individual false statements: harmful, false or misleading adversarial narratives may target at-risk groups, current scientific consensus, democracy, civic institutions and governing bodies, including through contextual omissions. This is the current page's classificatory scope; the selected sources do not establish that the same criteria governed the historical DEL or Oracle segment. Its statement that it accepts no funding from media companies or technology platforms is also a current self-description. Historic licensing alone neither resolves nor establishes a contradiction without the relevant fee/payment definitions and dates. It describes the Online Harms Monetisation Dashboard in prospective language: it **will** estimate revenues across the open web and social platforms. This is a stated product direction, not proof of a deployed dashboard. Its approximately USD 200 million annual redirection figure is GDI's estimate attributed to its and partner organisations' work, not an independently tested outcome here. The page neither confirms current DEL distribution through another supplier nor establishes that all such distribution ended.\n\nIts invitations to peers and academics to critique methodology are not an affected publisher's appeal instrument. The three selected records do not disclose a publisher notification entitlement, reasons/evidence procedure, correction or removal deadline, independent appeal, or propagation of corrected ratings to customers. Those instruments are **unacquired**, not proved nonexistent. Oracle's privacy opt-out/DSAR continuity during wind-down concerns a different process and cannot fill this gap.\n\n## Candidate directional relationships and limits\n\n| Direction | Supported relationship | Stage / boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| GDI → Oracle Contextual Intelligence | Supplies high-risk website ratings packaged in `gi_gdi_pfi` | Oracle's 2024 product description; no executed licence or customer activation inspected |\n| Oracle segment → advertisers | Offers a classification input for contextual targeting/avoidance | Product capability; actual selection, default and restriction effects unproved for this segment |\n| Oracle → advertising customers and integrations | Announces end of Contextual Intelligence service/access on 30 September 2024 | Dated official provider policy; retained-data rights depend on unacquired instruments |\n| Oracle → data providers | Describes continuing payment calculation under executed contracts for post-EOL usage | General policy only; no GDI-specific amount, payment or continuing use established |\n| GDI → OHMD | Describes a forthcoming revenue-estimation product | Current stated plan, not verified operational deployment |\n\nThe strongest rival to a present-tense exclusion-network account is documented channel retirement combined with an unresolved current distribution route. Conversely, the retirement notice cannot establish that historical signals had no continuing use. A high-value next record would be the historical GDI–Oracle licence/service description or a current distribution agreement specifying publisher review, update/deletion propagation and recipient discretion. No further acquisition is undertaken in this packet.\n\n## Custody and bounded failures\n\nOriginals: `mechanism-gdi-about.html` (SHA-256 `7e26f1638af8a92ea94193ca8d4011d6735dacf6f56716d7afd63a31fdbc1e1f`); `mechanism-oracle-guide2024.pdf` (`47b531a6967b09c9d9fd714cf209a7cbb49263686c1db2405399a71ffe6b86da`); `mechanism-oracle-eol2024.pdf` (`179f16108f5f783a79092c4b4835e4100557cd3a04fb0c96fe92bf5ee0ca5f2a`). Full extraction of the 129-page guide was retained, but only the scoped passages above were substantively read. One large local display was truncated; it is not counted as a full read. Exact transport, derivative/image hashes and reading scopes are in `mechanism-captures.json`.\n\nThe indexed GDI 14 April 2022 Jounce announcement redirected to the current blog on ordinary web-reader opening; the historical article was not acquired or used to create a partnership edge. An indexed 2022 GDI policy PDF returned InternalError in the web reader; the parent replaced that planned third record with Oracle's consequential end-of-service policy, and that PDF route was closed without another attempt. No secondary controversy accounts, list entries, harmful-content endpoints or operational customer systems were read. The root's Oak article is a separate source and was not duplicated.\n",
        "file": "research/gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support",
        "title": "Oak support for GDI: specified capacity and a commercial intervention",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root donor acquisition closed. The product/counterpart lane is separate. This note establishes donor-reported awards and purpose, not an executed licence, traced payment or campaign instruction.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root donor acquisition closed. The product/counterpart lane is separate. This note establishes donor-reported awards and purpose, not an executed licence, traced payment or campaign instruction.</p>\n<p>Oak&#x27;s 2023 Annual Report, PDF/printed26, lists <strong>Global Disinformation Index — USD903614 (3 years)</strong>, described as core support to expand technological solutions addressing online disinformation. The report&#x27;s PDF6 frames its lists as 2023 grant-making. It supplies no exact approval/start/end dates, instalments, contracting legal entity or GDI grant conditions. The three-year amount is not annual expenditure or cash received. PDF4 identifies Oak as a group of philanthropic organisations in multiple countries; the .dk hosting location does not identify a Danish legal grantor. [Existing donor-report citation](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The same original page26 lists three already relevant rights organisations: National Council for Civil Liberties (Liberty), USD783133/3years core support for public/policymaker human-rights work; Open Rights Group, USD437349/3years to support refugee/migrant-sector opposition to data collection/sharing and technologies driving immigration controls; and Privacy International, USD1138554/3years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. These earlier awards strengthen the common-funder/divergent-intervention evidence. None is a verified earmark for the later TCN complaint or Statewatch/ORG letter. Do not calculate the litigation budget from these amounts or claim the June2026 DFF grant was the only possible prior source of resources.</p>\n<p>Oak&#x27;s [3 July2024 programme story](http[local research file] repeats the report&#x27;s GDI account: it explicitly supports reducing the commercial incentives of disinformation and describes the Dynamic Exclusion List being licensed to agencies, brand-safety firms and other businesses. It portrays the product as an input to advertisers&#x27; choices. Its descriptions of neutrality/independence are Oak&#x27;s descriptions, not independently established ratings of GDI. The article attributes an estimated USD200million annual revenue reduction and an80percent fall to co-founder Clare Melford, who expressly disclaims sole credit. No underlying measurement, counterfactual or transactions were acquired. The surrounding coverage/list figures are historical, including a June2023 assessment date; none is a verified September2026 operating statistic.</p>\n<p>This establishes a deliberate donor-supported capacity aimed at the revenue channel. It does not show Oak selecting websites, approving classifier rules, ordering a particular advertiser to stop spending, or commanding a government. The counterpart/product records are needed to show how the classifications become selectable restrictions, and whether a historical delivery route still operates. A common donor can support efforts to constrain commercial misinformation and efforts to limit surveillance without holding a single uniform position on every technology or legal power. That observation does not establish universal independence from grant conditions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-bounded-reading\">Custody and bounded reading</h2>\n<p>The .org report URL found in search returned404 in one ordinary GET; its error body is retained and the route closed. Existing case source src-4a4bb675ee5f supplied the actual .dk URL, acquired with one successful GET: oak-annual2023-dk.pdf, SHA256 bc576201d168bc53091be98e1b227a714bbff5bdf0cd5239f2bbd205867a51ac. Root read PDF1,4,6,24–26 as extracted text and visually checked the full grant page26. Other pages were extracted but not silently classified as read. This refreshes an existing source with new reading scope; prior pp4–5/p40 context must be preserved in later integration.</p>\n<p>The July2024 article original is oak-information2024.html, SHAbbc34e8233ca5c69946da666075b1ccd8f6399132c354c1c44044a54aaec5f4c. Root read its substantive official-reader body. The article and annual report repeat the same narrative and attributed GDI estimates; they are not two independent outcome confirmations. Their references to IPIE and Foxglove are context, not an opened research branch or independently verified litigation/UNESCO findings.</p>\n<p>A finite exact-term search of retained Oak2025 report text found no GDI match; this does not prove funding or the organisation ceased. A whole-case label/source/lead search found no exact GDI record before this run. Initial substring matching for IPIE falsely matched recipient; a corrected word-boundary search removed those irrelevant results. No conclusions were drawn from them. Original transports, error custody, page render and hashes are in donor-captures.json. No account, outreach, graph, visible UI or packaging changes.</p>",
        "path": "gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09/oak-gdi-support.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-4a4bb675ee5f",
          "w32-gdi-s-oakstory"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root donor acquisition closed. The product/counterpart lane is separate. This note establishes donor-reported awards and purpose, not an executed licence, traced payment or campaign instruction.\n\nOak's 2023 Annual Report, PDF/printed26, lists **Global Disinformation Index — USD903614 (3 years)**, described as core support to expand technological solutions addressing online disinformation. The report's PDF6 frames its lists as 2023 grant-making. It supplies no exact approval/start/end dates, instalments, contracting legal entity or GDI grant conditions. The three-year amount is not annual expenditure or cash received. PDF4 identifies Oak as a group of philanthropic organisations in multiple countries; the .dk hosting location does not identify a Danish legal grantor. Existing donor-report citation (see source references)\n\nThe same original page26 lists three already relevant rights organisations: National Council for Civil Liberties (Liberty), USD783133/3years core support for public/policymaker human-rights work; Open Rights Group, USD437349/3years to support refugee/migrant-sector opposition to data collection/sharing and technologies driving immigration controls; and Privacy International, USD1138554/3years for privacy protections and safeguards against surveillance/data exploitation. These earlier awards strengthen the common-funder/divergent-intervention evidence. None is a verified earmark for the later TCN complaint or Statewatch/ORG letter. Do not calculate the litigation budget from these amounts or claim the June2026 DFF grant was the only possible prior source of resources.\n\nOak's 3 July2024 programme story (see source references) repeats the report's GDI account: it explicitly supports reducing the commercial incentives of disinformation and describes the Dynamic Exclusion List being licensed to agencies, brand-safety firms and other businesses. It portrays the product as an input to advertisers' choices. Its descriptions of neutrality/independence are Oak's descriptions, not independently established ratings of GDI. The article attributes an estimated USD200million annual revenue reduction and an80percent fall to co-founder Clare Melford, who expressly disclaims sole credit. No underlying measurement, counterfactual or transactions were acquired. The surrounding coverage/list figures are historical, including a June2023 assessment date; none is a verified September2026 operating statistic.\n\nThis establishes a deliberate donor-supported capacity aimed at the revenue channel. It does not show Oak selecting websites, approving classifier rules, ordering a particular advertiser to stop spending, or commanding a government. The counterpart/product records are needed to show how the classifications become selectable restrictions, and whether a historical delivery route still operates. A common donor can support efforts to constrain commercial misinformation and efforts to limit surveillance without holding a single uniform position on every technology or legal power. That observation does not establish universal independence from grant conditions.\n\n## Custody and bounded reading\n\nThe .org report URL found in search returned404 in one ordinary GET; its error body is retained and the route closed. Existing case source src-4a4bb675ee5f supplied the actual .dk URL, acquired with one successful GET: oak-annual2023-dk.pdf, SHA256 bc576201d168bc53091be98e1b227a714bbff5bdf0cd5239f2bbd205867a51ac. Root read PDF1,4,6,24–26 as extracted text and visually checked the full grant page26. Other pages were extracted but not silently classified as read. This refreshes an existing source with new reading scope; prior pp4–5/p40 context must be preserved in later integration.\n\nThe July2024 article original is oak-information2024.html, SHAbbc34e8233ca5c69946da666075b1ccd8f6399132c354c1c44044a54aaec5f4c. Root read its substantive official-reader body. The article and annual report repeat the same narrative and attributed GDI estimates; they are not two independent outcome confirmations. Their references to IPIE and Foxglove are context, not an opened research branch or independently verified litigation/UNESCO findings.\n\nA finite exact-term search of retained Oak2025 report text found no GDI match; this does not prove funding or the organisation ceased. A whole-case label/source/lead search found no exact GDI record before this run. Initial substring matching for IPIE falsely matched recipient; a corrected word-boundary search removed those irrelevant results. No conclusions were drawn from them. Original transports, error custody, page render and hashes are in donor-captures.json. No account, outreach, graph, visible UI or packaging changes.\n",
        "file": "research/gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-oak-gdi-support.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection",
        "title": "Mannifera selection, fiscal authority and the HRLC reform output",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded continuation selected by the latest forest review. This adds a published selection mechanism, fiscal-trustee authority, one member's disclosed financial participation, and an identifiable Mannifera-funded HRLC policy output. It does not establish how any individual voted on the HRLC grant or that its promised common expert ",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded continuation selected by the latest forest review. This adds a published selection mechanism, fiscal-trustee authority, one member&#x27;s disclosed financial participation, and an identifiable Mannifera-funded HRLC policy output. It does not establish how any individual voted on the HRLC grant or that its promised common expert position was formally agreed.</p>\n<p>The distinction that matters is between three decisions: choosing a project for collective support, authorising a charitable grant from the hosted pool, and endorsing particular policy recommendations. The documents allocate the first two functions; the report and subsequent advocacy show policy production, while collective endorsement remains unresolved.</p>\n<h2 id=\"selection-and-money-custody\">Selection and money custody</h2>\n<p>Mannifera&#x27;s Membership Guide places membership contributions into an Australian Communities Foundation (ACF) sub-fund and pooled fund. It describes a formal enabling partnership with Philanthropy Australia, ACF and Reichstein Foundation, and a member Taskforce plus Executive Officer. Members commit to at least $65,000 annually for three years. This is a published membership model, not a receipt showing every member paid that minimum in 2024. [Membership Guide](http[local research file] physical PDF pp7–8, printed governance/joining spreads; relevant passages read in the preceding funding pass and reused here. No publication date is inferred from its URL.</p>\n<p>The Granting Guide provides the actual staged process. The Executive Officer handles enquiries and assesses proposals; up to six collective members recommend a shortlist; the Taskforce endorses that shortlist; voting members decide by consensus at the annual Muster. Interests are recorded and assessed for conflicts or management. Criteria include strategic fit, a credible theory of change, political opportunity, an appropriate team/coalition and charity eligibility. It explicitly supports legal reform, inside-track advocacy and coalition building. However, the guide contains a <strong>2023 timetable</strong>, despite its 2024 URL path. It establishes published historical procedure, not proof that every step was followed for the special 2024 round. It does not specify an automatic recusal rule or document anyone&#x27;s particular vote. [Granting Guide](http[local research file] PDF pp6–8, particularly printed pp10–11, stages 1–5 and 2023 timeline; pp8–9 assessment criteria.</p>\n<p>The current approach page calls the governing body a rotating member <strong>Board</strong> alongside the Executive Officer and says members have equal opportunity to influence strategy and grants. That terminology differs from the older Taskforce guide; it is not, by itself, proof of a newly incorporated legal entity or a precise governance-change date. Nor does equal opportunity alone establish equal votes. [Current governance description](http[local research file] Governance paragraph, rendered lines 81–83.</p>\n<p>ACF&#x27;s current FAQ identifies <strong>Australian Communities Foundation Limited</strong> as trustee. Named funds are management accounts rather than separate legal entities; donors request grants, but the trustee must approve them. The FAQ describes a practice of actioning requests unless a legal obstacle exists, while explicitly declining to guarantee donor directions. This shows practical donor influence alongside retained legal responsibility. [ACF FAQ](http[local research file] questions on named funds, trustee identity and donor choice, lines 78–95, 118–119, 153–155.</p>\n<p>The public ACF establishment template identifies the trustee&#x27;s <strong>ABN 20 077 830 347</strong>. Section 12 says gifts join the trust assets; the trustee need not follow preferences and may grant without asking first. Advisory committees can only recommend grants to ACF&#x27;s board. These are substantial retained powers in a public template, not an acquired Mannifera-signed agreement. The exact underlying ACF trust and any negotiated Mannifera arrangements remain unidentified. [Sub-fund establishment form](http[local research file] PDF p1, p3 section 5(iii), p8 section 12. The dated URL is not treated as a verified execution or publication date.</p>\n<p>One concrete member-money example is <strong>The Myer Foundation</strong>. Its FY24 report lists a three-year <strong>$165,000</strong> Mannifera membership award, approved FY2022 and labelled membership 2021–2024, with a dash under commitment from FY24. Separate FY24 entries are <strong>$5,000</strong> general operating support in Directors&#x27; Grants and <strong>$9,100</strong> general operating support through its Family Grants Program. These are recorded values/commitments, not demonstrated cash payments; the old membership award is not a new $165,000 FY24 commitment. The report names Jemima Myer as the Foundation&#x27;s Mannifera representative and a Mannifera board member. No HRLC earmark or individual vote follows. Currency is printed as dollars in Australian context, without a currency code. [The Myer Foundation FY24 report](http[local research file] PDF p4 Directors&#x27; Grants, p8 Family Grants, p9 representation biography. Only these scoped entries were examined; a separate official annual-reports landing-page route failed and was not retried.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-2024-round-and-hrlcs-intended-role\">The 2024 round and HRLC&#x27;s intended role</h2>\n<p>Mannifera&#x27;s Executive Officer describes a dedicated open round following the 2023 Voice referendum, selecting seven organisations and providing <strong>$370,000</strong> with an unnamed outside co-funder. It names <strong>$60,000 awarded to HRLC</strong> to align legal/technical experts and equip advocates with a shared reform position. Reset&#x27;s <strong>$40,000</strong> was for transparency advocacy, with HRLC and Digital Rights Watch identified as partners. This establishes a deliberately complementary programme rather than a connection inferred solely from shared donors. The unnamed co-funder&#x27;s amount, payment date and influence are not disclosed; no share is assigned to Myer or any other member. [Executive Officer&#x27;s round account](http[local research file] lines 13–16 and 27–32. The body supplies context but no visible precise publication date; award amounts are not bank receipts.</p>\n<p>The standing partner record labels HRLC&#x27;s award a <strong>2024 Signature Grant</strong>, connects it to misinformation, Online Safety Act and privacy reform opportunities, and distinguishes older grants. That supports a 2024 award-purpose relation, not the assertion that a particular unpublished expert agreement was completed. [HRLC partner entry](http[local research file] Human Rights Law Centre—Disinformation section.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-actually-identifiable-as-an-output\">What is actually identifiable as an output</h2>\n<p><strong>Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation</strong> is authored by David Mejia-Canales and dated <strong>4 October 2024</strong>. It expressly acknowledges a Mannifera grant. Named assistance includes Jackie Turner and the <strong>Australian Conservation Foundation</strong>, which is distinct from the fiscal host <strong>Australian Communities Foundation</strong>. Its main proposals combine a legal platform duty with human-rights constraints, limited removal powers, user data control and court oversight. Crucially, it attributes views to the authors and says they need not reflect HRLC, affiliates or supporters. It is a funded policy output, not an endorsement register. The acknowledgment does not identify the grant number, amount or budget line; assigning the whole $60,000 award to this report would go beyond it. [Rights-First PDF](http[local research file] physical PDF pp2–3, printed pp2–5, acknowledgment/author statement and executive summary. No substantive audit of all legal reasoning was undertaken.</p>\n<p>The disclaimer does not erase HRLC&#x27;s subsequent institutional advocacy. Its public launch page, labelled <strong>7 October 2024</strong>, calls for an independent rule-setting regulator, legislated duty, rights assessment and substantial penalties. It thus provides a recipient-level policy position. It still does not turn other consultees, the donor or every coalition partner into signatories. [HRLC launch](http[local research file] dated heading and recommendations, read through the indexed primary page.</p>\n<p>An HRLC update labelled <strong>8 October 2024</strong> says Mejia-Canales represented it at Parliament House and met with the Albanese Government. Its URL contains a different 2025 date string, so the displayed date and URL must not be silently conflated. The account establishes HRLC&#x27;s report of engagement, not an independently acquired meeting minute or government acceptance of each recommendation. [HRLC parliamentary-engagement update](http[local research file] lines 40–49.</p>\n<p>HRLC&#x27;s 2024–25 annual report says the publication was followed by parliamentary lobbying and claims its intervention helped secure the November 2024 duty commitment. This is participant attribution, not independent causal proof. Its stated preference for a duty over blanket youth social-media bans also limits any claim that this advocacy endorsed every age restriction. The donor section lists Mannifera among donations/grant payments received during 1 July 2024–30 June 2025; the visual amount-band mapping was not verified here, so no exact receipt is inferred. [HRLC Annual Report 2024–25](http[local research file] p38 and p66. The amount, period and restriction of the 2024 grant still need reconciliation.</p>\n<p>Mannifera&#x27;s 2025 impact account names HRLC, Australian Democracy Network and Reset as misinformation-bill advocates, reports collective advocacy, and describes interest in a digital duty. It also admits the misinformation bill did not proceed. Its claims of securing amendments and increasing parliamentary support are retrospective funder/partner assessments; no amendment number or independent counterfactual is supplied in the passage. The report further describes networking, communications and convening support. None identifies a signed common platform spanning every funded group. [Mannifera Impact Report 2025](http[local research file] PDF p5/printed pp6–7 and PDF p8/printed p12. The strategy-coordination passage on the following physical page concerns another funding area and is not transferred into this digital-reform claim.</p>\n<h2 id=\"record-to-decision-conclusion\">Record-to-decision conclusion</h2>\n<p>The supported chain is: a member contributes or commits to the pool; Mannifera&#x27;s published process selects aligned projects; ACF retains grant authority under its general arrangements; an HRLC publication credits Mannifera and articulates a regulatory position; HRLC reports taking that work to Parliament. The actual 2024 selection file, grant contract and coalition endorsement record are separate missing links. No single member&#x27;s control of the project, common donor instruction over report text, or government adoption of all recommendations has been established.</p>\n<p>The narrow next records are the special-round assessment/shortlist and conflict-management record; the Mannifera–ACF executed arrangement and HRLC approval/grant letter; and HRLC&#x27;s expert-convening agenda, participant list, agreed statement/version history and grant-completion report. Those would distinguish a jointly endorsed reform position from a named author&#x27;s funded framework and later compatible advocacy. Likely custodians are Mannifera/ACF for selection and grants, and HRLC for the convening and output. No request has been sent.</p>\n<p>This pass stops at that decision breakpoint for the root forest review. Public pages and scoped reader extracts were used; no original PDFs or hashes are retained in this single-file lane. Search results about other causes, member biographies and unrelated coalitions were not treated as this project&#x27;s evidence. Butterfield, ACNC, account access and outreach remain outside this run.</p>",
        "path": "governance-wave-2026-09-09/mannifera-selection.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mann-granting",
          "w12-gov-s-acf-faq",
          "w12-gov-s-acf-template",
          "w12-gov-s-myer2024",
          "w12-gov-s-mann-round",
          "w12-gov-s-rights-first",
          "w12-gov-s-hrlc-launch",
          "w12-gov-s-hrlc-parliament"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded continuation selected by the latest forest review. This adds a published selection mechanism, fiscal-trustee authority, one member's disclosed financial participation, and an identifiable Mannifera-funded HRLC policy output. It does not establish how any individual voted on the HRLC grant or that its promised common expert position was formally agreed.\n\nThe distinction that matters is between three decisions: choosing a project for collective support, authorising a charitable grant from the hosted pool, and endorsing particular policy recommendations. The documents allocate the first two functions; the report and subsequent advocacy show policy production, while collective endorsement remains unresolved.\n\n## Selection and money custody\n\nMannifera's Membership Guide places membership contributions into an Australian Communities Foundation (ACF) sub-fund and pooled fund. It describes a formal enabling partnership with Philanthropy Australia, ACF and Reichstein Foundation, and a member Taskforce plus Executive Officer. Members commit to at least $65,000 annually for three years. This is a published membership model, not a receipt showing every member paid that minimum in 2024. Membership Guide (see source references) physical PDF pp7–8, printed governance/joining spreads; relevant passages read in the preceding funding pass and reused here. No publication date is inferred from its URL.\n\nThe Granting Guide provides the actual staged process. The Executive Officer handles enquiries and assesses proposals; up to six collective members recommend a shortlist; the Taskforce endorses that shortlist; voting members decide by consensus at the annual Muster. Interests are recorded and assessed for conflicts or management. Criteria include strategic fit, a credible theory of change, political opportunity, an appropriate team/coalition and charity eligibility. It explicitly supports legal reform, inside-track advocacy and coalition building. However, the guide contains a **2023 timetable**, despite its 2024 URL path. It establishes published historical procedure, not proof that every step was followed for the special 2024 round. It does not specify an automatic recusal rule or document anyone's particular vote. Granting Guide (see source references) PDF pp6–8, particularly printed pp10–11, stages 1–5 and 2023 timeline; pp8–9 assessment criteria.\n\nThe current approach page calls the governing body a rotating member **Board** alongside the Executive Officer and says members have equal opportunity to influence strategy and grants. That terminology differs from the older Taskforce guide; it is not, by itself, proof of a newly incorporated legal entity or a precise governance-change date. Nor does equal opportunity alone establish equal votes. Current governance description (see source references) Governance paragraph, rendered lines 81–83.\n\nACF's current FAQ identifies **Australian Communities Foundation Limited** as trustee. Named funds are management accounts rather than separate legal entities; donors request grants, but the trustee must approve them. The FAQ describes a practice of actioning requests unless a legal obstacle exists, while explicitly declining to guarantee donor directions. This shows practical donor influence alongside retained legal responsibility. ACF FAQ (see source references) questions on named funds, trustee identity and donor choice, lines 78–95, 118–119, 153–155.\n\nThe public ACF establishment template identifies the trustee's **ABN 20 077 830 347**. Section 12 says gifts join the trust assets; the trustee need not follow preferences and may grant without asking first. Advisory committees can only recommend grants to ACF's board. These are substantial retained powers in a public template, not an acquired Mannifera-signed agreement. The exact underlying ACF trust and any negotiated Mannifera arrangements remain unidentified. Sub-fund establishment form (see source references) PDF p1, p3 section 5(iii), p8 section 12. The dated URL is not treated as a verified execution or publication date.\n\nOne concrete member-money example is **The Myer Foundation**. Its FY24 report lists a three-year **$165,000** Mannifera membership award, approved FY2022 and labelled membership 2021–2024, with a dash under commitment from FY24. Separate FY24 entries are **$5,000** general operating support in Directors' Grants and **$9,100** general operating support through its Family Grants Program. These are recorded values/commitments, not demonstrated cash payments; the old membership award is not a new $165,000 FY24 commitment. The report names Jemima Myer as the Foundation's Mannifera representative and a Mannifera board member. No HRLC earmark or individual vote follows. Currency is printed as dollars in Australian context, without a currency code. The Myer Foundation FY24 report (see source references) PDF p4 Directors' Grants, p8 Family Grants, p9 representation biography. Only these scoped entries were examined; a separate official annual-reports landing-page route failed and was not retried.\n\n## The 2024 round and HRLC's intended role\n\nMannifera's Executive Officer describes a dedicated open round following the 2023 Voice referendum, selecting seven organisations and providing **$370,000** with an unnamed outside co-funder. It names **$60,000 awarded to HRLC** to align legal/technical experts and equip advocates with a shared reform position. Reset's **$40,000** was for transparency advocacy, with HRLC and Digital Rights Watch identified as partners. This establishes a deliberately complementary programme rather than a connection inferred solely from shared donors. The unnamed co-funder's amount, payment date and influence are not disclosed; no share is assigned to Myer or any other member. Executive Officer's round account (see source references) lines 13–16 and 27–32. The body supplies context but no visible precise publication date; award amounts are not bank receipts.\n\nThe standing partner record labels HRLC's award a **2024 Signature Grant**, connects it to misinformation, Online Safety Act and privacy reform opportunities, and distinguishes older grants. That supports a 2024 award-purpose relation, not the assertion that a particular unpublished expert agreement was completed. HRLC partner entry (see source references) Human Rights Law Centre—Disinformation section.\n\n## What is actually identifiable as an output\n\n**Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation** is authored by David Mejia-Canales and dated **4 October 2024**. It expressly acknowledges a Mannifera grant. Named assistance includes Jackie Turner and the **Australian Conservation Foundation**, which is distinct from the fiscal host **Australian Communities Foundation**. Its main proposals combine a legal platform duty with human-rights constraints, limited removal powers, user data control and court oversight. Crucially, it attributes views to the authors and says they need not reflect HRLC, affiliates or supporters. It is a funded policy output, not an endorsement register. The acknowledgment does not identify the grant number, amount or budget line; assigning the whole $60,000 award to this report would go beyond it. Rights-First PDF (see source references) physical PDF pp2–3, printed pp2–5, acknowledgment/author statement and executive summary. No substantive audit of all legal reasoning was undertaken.\n\nThe disclaimer does not erase HRLC's subsequent institutional advocacy. Its public launch page, labelled **7 October 2024**, calls for an independent rule-setting regulator, legislated duty, rights assessment and substantial penalties. It thus provides a recipient-level policy position. It still does not turn other consultees, the donor or every coalition partner into signatories. HRLC launch (see source references) dated heading and recommendations, read through the indexed primary page.\n\nAn HRLC update labelled **8 October 2024** says Mejia-Canales represented it at Parliament House and met with the Albanese Government. Its URL contains a different 2025 date string, so the displayed date and URL must not be silently conflated. The account establishes HRLC's report of engagement, not an independently acquired meeting minute or government acceptance of each recommendation. HRLC parliamentary-engagement update (see source references) lines 40–49.\n\nHRLC's 2024–25 annual report says the publication was followed by parliamentary lobbying and claims its intervention helped secure the November 2024 duty commitment. This is participant attribution, not independent causal proof. Its stated preference for a duty over blanket youth social-media bans also limits any claim that this advocacy endorsed every age restriction. The donor section lists Mannifera among donations/grant payments received during 1 July 2024–30 June 2025; the visual amount-band mapping was not verified here, so no exact receipt is inferred. HRLC Annual Report 2024–25 (see source references) p38 and p66. The amount, period and restriction of the 2024 grant still need reconciliation.\n\nMannifera's 2025 impact account names HRLC, Australian Democracy Network and Reset as misinformation-bill advocates, reports collective advocacy, and describes interest in a digital duty. It also admits the misinformation bill did not proceed. Its claims of securing amendments and increasing parliamentary support are retrospective funder/partner assessments; no amendment number or independent counterfactual is supplied in the passage. The report further describes networking, communications and convening support. None identifies a signed common platform spanning every funded group. Mannifera Impact Report 2025 (see source references) PDF p5/printed pp6–7 and PDF p8/printed p12. The strategy-coordination passage on the following physical page concerns another funding area and is not transferred into this digital-reform claim.\n\n## Record-to-decision conclusion\n\nThe supported chain is: a member contributes or commits to the pool; Mannifera's published process selects aligned projects; ACF retains grant authority under its general arrangements; an HRLC publication credits Mannifera and articulates a regulatory position; HRLC reports taking that work to Parliament. The actual 2024 selection file, grant contract and coalition endorsement record are separate missing links. No single member's control of the project, common donor instruction over report text, or government adoption of all recommendations has been established.\n\nThe narrow next records are the special-round assessment/shortlist and conflict-management record; the Mannifera–ACF executed arrangement and HRLC approval/grant letter; and HRLC's expert-convening agenda, participant list, agreed statement/version history and grant-completion report. Those would distinguish a jointly endorsed reform position from a named author's funded framework and later compatible advocacy. Likely custodians are Mannifera/ACF for selection and grants, and HRLC for the convening and output. No request has been sent.\n\nThis pass stops at that decision breakpoint for the root forest review. Public pages and scoped reader extracts were used; no original PDFs or hashes are retained in this single-file lane. Search results about other causes, member biographies and unrelated coalitions were not treated as this project's evidence. Butterfield, ACNC, account access and outreach remain outside this run.\n",
        "file": "research/governance-wave-2026-09-09-mannifera-selection.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance",
        "title": "McKinnon's commissioning governance",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded public-source follow-through from funding-wave-2026-09-09/reset-funding.md and the latest forest review. No canonical case changes, outreach or ACNC access.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded public-source follow-through from <code>funding-wave-2026-09-09/reset-funding.md</code> and the latest forest review. No canonical case changes, outreach or ACNC access.</p>\n<p>The new finding is an identifiable internal research-governance mechanism, alongside an important entity transition. The historical Research Centre reports Research Committee oversight of research spending and publication/dissemination activities. McKinnon separately identifies its Reset commissions. The public records read here do <strong>not</strong> join those two facts into a Reset-specific committee decision, contracting entity or editorial approval right.</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-entities-and-the-historical-decision-layer\">Legal entities and the historical decision layer</h2>\n<p>The name McKinnon covers several entities. Its current funding page lists the Foundation trust, Research Centre and Charitable Foundation separately. The page says Grant Rule and Sophie Oh fund the organisation and describes related investment and administration arrangements. That is a group disclosure, not the execution page of either Reset contract. [Funding and Financials](http[local research file] “Our Funding” and “Our entities”; source <code>gov-mck-s-funding</code>, read.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Entity and identifier</th>\n<th>What the primary record establishes</th>\n<th>Consequence for the commissions</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>The Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation, ABN 28 739 100 711</td>\n<td>ABR identifies a discretionary investment trust, active from 21 April 2015, with private ancillary fund status. [ABR record](http[local research file] entity and DGR fields; <code>gov-mck-s-abr-trust</code>, read.</td>\n<td>This identifies the trust, not its corporate trustee&#x27;s exact legal name or the contract signatory.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd, ABN 40 656 129 127 / ACN 656 129 127</td>\n<td>ABR history carries this name from 16 December 2021 to 14 April 2026. The same identifier now belongs to OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD. [History](http[local research file] entity-name rows, and [current record](http[local research file] <code>gov-mck-s-abr-research</code>, read.</td>\n<td>Preserve historical name and current alias on the same entity. Renaming does not establish contract assignment or a completed wind-up.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd, ABN 12 653 756 597</td>\n<td>ABR records an Australian public company active from 17 September 2021. [ABR record](http[local research file] entity fields; <code>gov-mck-s-abr-charitable</code>, read.</td>\n<td>Its existence during 2023/24 does not show it commissioned these reports. The September 2025 privacy policy is not a historical contract.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>McKinnon&#x27;s consolidated 2025 program report says the Charitable Foundation became the group&#x27;s primary charitable vehicle during 2025, following specific listing. Its financial year ends on 31 December. This is a dated operating transition, not simply a new public brand. The cover is dated <strong>18 February 2026</strong>, while the website link says published <strong>17 February 2026</strong>; retain both labels rather than silently choosing one. [Program Expenditure Report 2025](http[local research file] PDF pp1–2; <code>gov-mck-s-program2025</code>, read. The wider donation tables were inspected but are not used to assign a Reset payment.</p>\n<p>The trust&#x27;s FY2024 directors&#x27; report names <strong>Grant Rule and Michael Schoenfeld</strong> as the trustee&#x27;s directors throughout the reporting year and to the report date, unless otherwise stated. Its stated activity is grants aligned with policy and governance change. Note 12 identifies the Research Centre as delivering programs towards the trust&#x27;s goals and providing grant-program marketing/strategic advisory services at cost. It reports a <strong>$19,530,300 donation to the Research Centre in FY2024</strong>. This is intra-group capacity, not a Reset fee or a new amount to add to downstream spending. [Trust FY2024 financial report](http[local research file] PDF p3/printed1 and PDF pp16–17/printed14–15; <code>gov-mck-s-trust2024</code>, read in relevant scope.</p>\n<p>The Research Centre&#x27;s FY2024 report names <strong>Colin Galbraith, Grant Rule and Michael Schoenfeld</strong> as directors. It expressly places application of research funds and activities connected with publishing and disseminating research under <strong>Research Committee oversight</strong>. It reports one member at 30 June 2024, without naming that member. Its Note 11 reports the same FY2024 intra-group donation. The accounts identify an accountable institutional route; they do not disclose committee appointments, voting thresholds, delegated limits or a Reset decision. [Research Centre FY2024 report](http[local research file] PDF pp3–4/printed1–2, PDF p17/printed15 and PDF p18/printed16; <code>gov-mck-s-research2024</code>, read in relevant scope.</p>\n<p>The FY2023 report already names the same directors, Research Committee oversight and one member. Its adjacent history statements are internally awkward: printed1 describes funding in June 2023 and commencement in July 2023; printed2 describes the first operational year after funding in FY2022. Do not use either sentence to fix a confident commissioning chronology. [Research Centre FY2023 report](http[local research file] PDF pp3–4/printed1–2; <code>gov-mck-s-research2023</code>, read in that scope.</p>\n<p>Today&#x27;s general website board is a separate, later observation. It lists John Thwaites as interim executive chair and describes Acting CEO Leigh O&#x27;Neill as leading strategy, operations and programs; Tom Mooney leads the democracy work. These roles are not evidence of who approved the early-2023 Reset approach. <a>About McKinnon</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"from-commission-to-published-advocacy\">From commission to published advocacy</h2>\n<p>McKinnon&#x27;s current account gives the commission&#x27;s broad purpose: evaluate Australia&#x27;s regulatory system and recommend improvements. It names the May 2024 <em>Functioning or Failing?</em> and June 2024 <em>Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia</em>, commissioned in 2023 and 2024. It links readers to both outputs. That is a public report-use route, but not a contractual publication-clearance provision. [Commissioning account](http[local research file] Reset section; <code>gov-mck-s-commissions</code>, read. Reuse the existing canonical source/commission edges if already present.</p>\n<p>The May report names <strong>Rys Farthing and Alice Dawkins</strong> under authors/contributors. Its introduction says the Foundation approached Reset early in 2023 to design tests of the misinformation code; Reset attributes the research design to itself and methods from its global network. Its recommendations include considering a duty of care, risk assessments and researcher access. The report thus attributes question initiation to the funder and methodological work to the recipient. Neither attribution resolves who cleared publication or mandated conclusions. [Functioning or Failing?](http[local research file] PDF pp2–3 and5–6; <code>gov-mck-s-functioning2024</code>, read in relevant scope. The experiments&#x27; validity was not independently audited.</p>\n<p>The June report&#x27;s first three pages confirm its date and EU/UK comparison and recommend risk assessments, prescribed transparency reports, independent audits, data portals and researcher access. Those opening pages do not disclose an executed scope or approval arrangement. [Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia](http[local research file] PDF pp1–3; <code>gov-mck-s-transparency2024</code>, read in that scope. PDF pp30–31 were also inspected for end matter. The funder logo is not legible in the extracted text; commissioning attribution rests on McKinnon&#x27;s named account, not a visually unread logo.</p>\n<p>A separate, more revealing process record is the <strong>April 2024</strong> briefing <em>Regulating for Transparency</em>. It describes a <strong>March 2024 roundtable of 20 academic/civil-society experts</strong>, held under the Chatham House Rule, and translates discussion into regulatory recommendations. It acknowledges McKinnon support, assigns errors and omissions to Reset and explicitly separates attendance from endorsement. Its acknowledgements include HRLC contributors and a named independent consultant, among others; these are bounded contributions, not evidence all participants approved the final text. [Original briefing](http[local research file] PDF pp1,4,14–15/printed same; <code>gov-mck-s-roundtable2024</code>, read in relevant scope. This supports an actual convening-to-output path. Do not automatically label it one of the two commissions or assert a separate payment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-directional-relations-and-limits\">Candidate directional relations and limits</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate relation</th>\n<th>Type / evidence</th>\n<th>Boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Foundation trust → Research Centre: reports FY2024 intra-group donation</td>\n<td>Finance; <code>gov-mck-s-trust2024</code>, <code>gov-mck-s-research2024</code></td>\n<td>$19,530,300, dollar label; Australian context, currency code not printed in cited passages. One transaction reported by both sides, not two awards or Reset money.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Research Committee → Research Centre research spending and dissemination activities: oversees</td>\n<td>Governance; <code>gov-mck-s-research2023</code>, <code>gov-mck-s-research2024</code></td>\n<td>Historical general mandate; no Reset-specific decision or final editorial veto established.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rule/Schoenfeld → trustee board; Galbraith/Rule/Schoenfeld → Research Centre board: named directors</td>\n<td>Governance; respective FY2024 reports</td>\n<td>Historical entity-specific roles; no disclosed member-appointment or dismissal right.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Research Centre → OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD: later registered name</td>\n<td>Identity, dated 14 April 2026; <code>gov-mck-s-abr-research</code></td>\n<td>Same ABN/ACN; not an inferred ownership transfer. History extraction renders the first character as “0”; current record renders “O”.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>McKinnon → Reset May/June reports: commissions named evaluations and recommendations</td>\n<td>Commission; <code>gov-mck-s-commissions</code>, supported by recipient May introduction</td>\n<td>Group identity and purpose established; exact contracting company, fee and approval rights open.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>McKinnon → April briefing: acknowledged support; March roundtable → briefing: informs</td>\n<td>Support / convening-to-output; <code>gov-mck-s-roundtable2024</code></td>\n<td>Support amount/form unknown. Participant attendance is expressly not endorsement.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The strongest supported explanation is financed agenda-setting with identifiable research production and publication responsibilities. A compatible rival is that the funder selected an already aligned specialist, leaving methods and conclusions with Reset. The records do not distinguish that from exercised donor editorial direction. Research Committee oversight is a useful new institutional fact, not the missing evidence of a committee approving the particular reports.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the <strong>2023/24 executed Reset engagement letters and scopes</strong>, identifying legal counterparties, fee, milestones, publication rights and approval/termination terms; <strong>Research Committee terms of reference, membership/appointment resolutions and relevant minutes</strong>; and the <strong>single-member register and constitutions</strong> in force when those decisions were made. Custodians are McKinnon&#x27;s historical entities/current records holder and Reset. Appointment resolutions would distinguish founders&#x27; public sponsorship of appointments from their actual legal power. Contract allocation records would determine whether the Research Centre route applies to these commissions. None was obtained, and no contact was made.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-and-custody\">Reading and custody</h2>\n<p>All URLs above are primary issuer/recipient/ABR records. Access state is <code>read</code> only for the stated passages; no whole-report content audit is claimed. Source ancestry: existing funding note supplied discovery; McKinnon&#x27;s page links the commissioned recipient outputs; financial statements are published on McKinnon&#x27;s Storyblok asset host; ABR independently supplies registered identity/history. These are not ACNC mirrors accessed through a workaround. Search results on ACNC/storage and unrelated biographies were excluded without opening.</p>\n<p>Original PDF bytes were retrieved into memory, extracted with pypdf and hashed; they are <strong>not retained on disk</strong> because this lane owns only this note. Reproducible identifiers:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Original</th>\n<th>Byte count</th>\n<th>SHA-256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Trust FY2024</td>\n<td>1,503,445</td>\n<td><code>58777019dee161291be34314936208c79e9d1085239cac5a2cb2768475bd5cfc</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Research Centre FY2024</td>\n<td>1,538,073</td>\n<td><code>3fa0f6819f77c4170111318109d34d28a38328cf7c4725bd3d4e7d7fec2663da</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Research Centre FY2023</td>\n<td>777,035</td>\n<td><code>45cce3230034c975633aea56db54d6de32656779b8e4ae355d814c56c9cd44e7</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>June2024 transparency report</td>\n<td>11,375,061</td>\n<td><code>aaf1eb0c85f044f03e7db25d64a1647e67de5c22534f17fd4f4550df22082fcb</code></td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Trust FY2024 additional inspected passages: PDF4,10,16–18 (p18 text extraction blank). Research Centre FY2024: PDF3–4,11,17–18. No visual verification of signatures or logos is claimed. FY2023 web reader returned Internal Error; one ordinary GET succeeded. An independently published Monash2022 annual report was discovered as a possible strategy-development counterpart, but web reading exceeded the size limit and one ordinary GET returned HTTP403; it remains inaccessible and is not a findings source. Woolworths&#x27; Holly Kramer biography returned Internal Error and was not used. No further retries on these branches.</p>\n<p>A bounded search of exact entity names with constitution, Research Committee, governing council, commissioning and agreement terms did not locate the missing charter or Reset contract. This is a precise public-record frontier, not a claim those records do not exist. Acquisition stops here for the parent&#x27;s forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "governance-wave-2026-09-09/mckinnon-governance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-entities",
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust-abr",
          "w12-gov-s-research-abr-history",
          "w12-gov-s-research-abr-current",
          "w12-gov-s-charitable-abr",
          "w12-gov-s-mckinnon-trust2024",
          "w12-gov-s-research2024",
          "w12-gov-s-reset-roundtable"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded public-source follow-through from `funding-wave-2026-09-09/reset-funding.md` and the latest forest review. No canonical case changes, outreach or ACNC access.\n\nThe new finding is an identifiable internal research-governance mechanism, alongside an important entity transition. The historical Research Centre reports Research Committee oversight of research spending and publication/dissemination activities. McKinnon separately identifies its Reset commissions. The public records read here do **not** join those two facts into a Reset-specific committee decision, contracting entity or editorial approval right.\n\n## Legal entities and the historical decision layer\n\nThe name McKinnon covers several entities. Its current funding page lists the Foundation trust, Research Centre and Charitable Foundation separately. The page says Grant Rule and Sophie Oh fund the organisation and describes related investment and administration arrangements. That is a group disclosure, not the execution page of either Reset contract. Funding and Financials (see source references) “Our Funding” and “Our entities”; source `gov-mck-s-funding`, read.\n\n| Entity and identifier | What the primary record establishes | Consequence for the commissions |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| The Trustee for Susan McKinnon Foundation, ABN 28 739 100 711 | ABR identifies a discretionary investment trust, active from 21 April 2015, with private ancillary fund status. ABR record (see source references) entity and DGR fields; `gov-mck-s-abr-trust`, read. | This identifies the trust, not its corporate trustee's exact legal name or the contract signatory. |\n| Susan McKinnon Research Centre Ltd, ABN 40 656 129 127 / ACN 656 129 127 | ABR history carries this name from 16 December 2021 to 14 April 2026. The same identifier now belongs to OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD. History (see source references) entity-name rows, and current record (see source references) `gov-mck-s-abr-research`, read. | Preserve historical name and current alias on the same entity. Renaming does not establish contract assignment or a completed wind-up. |\n| Susan McKinnon Charitable Foundation Ltd, ABN 12 653 756 597 | ABR records an Australian public company active from 17 September 2021. ABR record (see source references) entity fields; `gov-mck-s-abr-charitable`, read. | Its existence during 2023/24 does not show it commissioned these reports. The September 2025 privacy policy is not a historical contract. |\n\nMcKinnon's consolidated 2025 program report says the Charitable Foundation became the group's primary charitable vehicle during 2025, following specific listing. Its financial year ends on 31 December. This is a dated operating transition, not simply a new public brand. The cover is dated **18 February 2026**, while the website link says published **17 February 2026**; retain both labels rather than silently choosing one. Program Expenditure Report 2025 (see source references) PDF pp1–2; `gov-mck-s-program2025`, read. The wider donation tables were inspected but are not used to assign a Reset payment.\n\nThe trust's FY2024 directors' report names **Grant Rule and Michael Schoenfeld** as the trustee's directors throughout the reporting year and to the report date, unless otherwise stated. Its stated activity is grants aligned with policy and governance change. Note 12 identifies the Research Centre as delivering programs towards the trust's goals and providing grant-program marketing/strategic advisory services at cost. It reports a **$19,530,300 donation to the Research Centre in FY2024**. This is intra-group capacity, not a Reset fee or a new amount to add to downstream spending. Trust FY2024 financial report (see source references) PDF p3/printed1 and PDF pp16–17/printed14–15; `gov-mck-s-trust2024`, read in relevant scope.\n\nThe Research Centre's FY2024 report names **Colin Galbraith, Grant Rule and Michael Schoenfeld** as directors. It expressly places application of research funds and activities connected with publishing and disseminating research under **Research Committee oversight**. It reports one member at 30 June 2024, without naming that member. Its Note 11 reports the same FY2024 intra-group donation. The accounts identify an accountable institutional route; they do not disclose committee appointments, voting thresholds, delegated limits or a Reset decision. Research Centre FY2024 report (see source references) PDF pp3–4/printed1–2, PDF p17/printed15 and PDF p18/printed16; `gov-mck-s-research2024`, read in relevant scope.\n\nThe FY2023 report already names the same directors, Research Committee oversight and one member. Its adjacent history statements are internally awkward: printed1 describes funding in June 2023 and commencement in July 2023; printed2 describes the first operational year after funding in FY2022. Do not use either sentence to fix a confident commissioning chronology. Research Centre FY2023 report (see source references) PDF pp3–4/printed1–2; `gov-mck-s-research2023`, read in that scope.\n\nToday's general website board is a separate, later observation. It lists John Thwaites as interim executive chair and describes Acting CEO Leigh O'Neill as leading strategy, operations and programs; Tom Mooney leads the democracy work. These roles are not evidence of who approved the early-2023 Reset approach. About McKinnon.\n\n## From commission to published advocacy\n\nMcKinnon's current account gives the commission's broad purpose: evaluate Australia's regulatory system and recommend improvements. It names the May 2024 *Functioning or Failing?* and June 2024 *Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia*, commissioned in 2023 and 2024. It links readers to both outputs. That is a public report-use route, but not a contractual publication-clearance provision. Commissioning account (see source references) Reset section; `gov-mck-s-commissions`, read. Reuse the existing canonical source/commission edges if already present.\n\nThe May report names **Rys Farthing and Alice Dawkins** under authors/contributors. Its introduction says the Foundation approached Reset early in 2023 to design tests of the misinformation code; Reset attributes the research design to itself and methods from its global network. Its recommendations include considering a duty of care, risk assessments and researcher access. The report thus attributes question initiation to the funder and methodological work to the recipient. Neither attribution resolves who cleared publication or mandated conclusions. Functioning or Failing? (see source references) PDF pp2–3 and5–6; `gov-mck-s-functioning2024`, read in relevant scope. The experiments' validity was not independently audited.\n\nThe June report's first three pages confirm its date and EU/UK comparison and recommend risk assessments, prescribed transparency reports, independent audits, data portals and researcher access. Those opening pages do not disclose an executed scope or approval arrangement. Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia (see source references) PDF pp1–3; `gov-mck-s-transparency2024`, read in that scope. PDF pp30–31 were also inspected for end matter. The funder logo is not legible in the extracted text; commissioning attribution rests on McKinnon's named account, not a visually unread logo.\n\nA separate, more revealing process record is the **April 2024** briefing *Regulating for Transparency*. It describes a **March 2024 roundtable of 20 academic/civil-society experts**, held under the Chatham House Rule, and translates discussion into regulatory recommendations. It acknowledges McKinnon support, assigns errors and omissions to Reset and explicitly separates attendance from endorsement. Its acknowledgements include HRLC contributors and a named independent consultant, among others; these are bounded contributions, not evidence all participants approved the final text. Original briefing (see source references) PDF pp1,4,14–15/printed same; `gov-mck-s-roundtable2024`, read in relevant scope. This supports an actual convening-to-output path. Do not automatically label it one of the two commissions or assert a separate payment.\n\n## Candidate directional relations and limits\n\n| Candidate relation | Type / evidence | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Foundation trust → Research Centre: reports FY2024 intra-group donation | Finance; `gov-mck-s-trust2024`, `gov-mck-s-research2024` | $19,530,300, dollar label; Australian context, currency code not printed in cited passages. One transaction reported by both sides, not two awards or Reset money. |\n| Research Committee → Research Centre research spending and dissemination activities: oversees | Governance; `gov-mck-s-research2023`, `gov-mck-s-research2024` | Historical general mandate; no Reset-specific decision or final editorial veto established. |\n| Rule/Schoenfeld → trustee board; Galbraith/Rule/Schoenfeld → Research Centre board: named directors | Governance; respective FY2024 reports | Historical entity-specific roles; no disclosed member-appointment or dismissal right. |\n| Research Centre → OH-RULE FAMILY PHILANTHROPY LTD: later registered name | Identity, dated 14 April 2026; `gov-mck-s-abr-research` | Same ABN/ACN; not an inferred ownership transfer. History extraction renders the first character as “0”; current record renders “O”. |\n| McKinnon → Reset May/June reports: commissions named evaluations and recommendations | Commission; `gov-mck-s-commissions`, supported by recipient May introduction | Group identity and purpose established; exact contracting company, fee and approval rights open. |\n| McKinnon → April briefing: acknowledged support; March roundtable → briefing: informs | Support / convening-to-output; `gov-mck-s-roundtable2024` | Support amount/form unknown. Participant attendance is expressly not endorsement. |\n\nThe strongest supported explanation is financed agenda-setting with identifiable research production and publication responsibilities. A compatible rival is that the funder selected an already aligned specialist, leaving methods and conclusions with Reset. The records do not distinguish that from exercised donor editorial direction. Research Committee oversight is a useful new institutional fact, not the missing evidence of a committee approving the particular reports.\n\nThe next discriminating records are the **2023/24 executed Reset engagement letters and scopes**, identifying legal counterparties, fee, milestones, publication rights and approval/termination terms; **Research Committee terms of reference, membership/appointment resolutions and relevant minutes**; and the **single-member register and constitutions** in force when those decisions were made. Custodians are McKinnon's historical entities/current records holder and Reset. Appointment resolutions would distinguish founders' public sponsorship of appointments from their actual legal power. Contract allocation records would determine whether the Research Centre route applies to these commissions. None was obtained, and no contact was made.\n\n## Reading and custody\n\nAll URLs above are primary issuer/recipient/ABR records. Access state is `read` only for the stated passages; no whole-report content audit is claimed. Source ancestry: existing funding note supplied discovery; McKinnon's page links the commissioned recipient outputs; financial statements are published on McKinnon's Storyblok asset host; ABR independently supplies registered identity/history. These are not ACNC mirrors accessed through a workaround. Search results on ACNC/storage and unrelated biographies were excluded without opening.\n\nOriginal PDF bytes were retrieved into memory, extracted with pypdf and hashed; they are **not retained on disk** because this lane owns only this note. Reproducible identifiers:\n\n| Original | Byte count | SHA-256 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Trust FY2024 | 1,503,445 | `58777019dee161291be34314936208c79e9d1085239cac5a2cb2768475bd5cfc` |\n| Research Centre FY2024 | 1,538,073 | `3fa0f6819f77c4170111318109d34d28a38328cf7c4725bd3d4e7d7fec2663da` |\n| Research Centre FY2023 | 777,035 | `45cce3230034c975633aea56db54d6de32656779b8e4ae355d814c56c9cd44e7` |\n| June2024 transparency report | 11,375,061 | `aaf1eb0c85f044f03e7db25d64a1647e67de5c22534f17fd4f4550df22082fcb` |\n\nTrust FY2024 additional inspected passages: PDF4,10,16–18 (p18 text extraction blank). Research Centre FY2024: PDF3–4,11,17–18. No visual verification of signatures or logos is claimed. FY2023 web reader returned Internal Error; one ordinary GET succeeded. An independently published Monash2022 annual report was discovered as a possible strategy-development counterpart, but web reading exceeded the size limit and one ordinary GET returned HTTP403; it remains inaccessible and is not a findings source. Woolworths' Holly Kramer biography returned Internal Error and was not used. No further retries on these branches.\n\nA bounded search of exact entity names with constitution, Research Committee, governing council, commissioning and agreement terms did not locate the missing charter or Reset contract. This is a precise public-record frontier, not a claim those records do not exist. Acquisition stops here for the parent's forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/governance-wave-2026-09-09-mckinnon-governance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles",
        "title": "Reset Tech UK: constitutional decision rights",
        "description": "Observed9September2026. Bounded primary-filing review of company14982650, distinct from the informal Online Safety Network and from other Reset legal entities. The May2025 constitution reveals a director-member structure and an explicit cross-entity conflict provision. It does not reconcile the current PSC categories or establish donor control of policy outp",
        "html": "<p>Observed9September2026. Bounded primary-filing review of company14982650, distinct from the informal Online Safety Network and from other Reset legal entities. The May2025 constitution reveals a director-member structure and an explicit cross-entity conflict provision. It does not reconcile the current PSC categories or establish donor control of policy outputs.</p>\n<h2 id=\"instruments-and-reading-scope\">Instruments and reading scope</h2>\n<p>Companies House filing history records articles and adoption resolution filed21May2025. The resolution is headed7May2025 and replaces the previous articles immediately; it bears Dale Benjamin Scott&#x27;s agreement as the voting member. Poppy Wood&#x27;s PSC notification, filed19May2025, gives7May2025 as the date she became registrable. The resolution is evidence of this adoption decision, not a permanent personal veto. Its signature date is printed5/7/2025 alongside the explicit7May heading; do not reinterpret it as a later July action. A separate source anomaly is that its header prints company number4982650 while the official docket and attached articles identify14982650. Retain this discrepancy rather than silently correcting a quotation or inventing another company.</p>\n<p>[Official filing history](http[local research file] [Filed articles](http[local research file] [Filed resolution](http[local research file] [Wood PSC01](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>All20 articles pages, both resolution pages and both PSC01 pages were visually inspected as scans. The articles contain17 numbered substantive pages following a cover and two index pages; below, PDF page equals printed page plus3. Relevant role/date/control passages were read on current official officers and PSC pages; unrelated personal-data fields are excluded from this note. These official web reads were observed9September but their reader cache reports an earlier crawl; they are not a freshly certified member register.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-can-decide\">Who can decide</h2>\n<p><strong>Directors and members are the same constitutional constituency.</strong> Article22, PDF14/printed11, makes directors the only members: appointment automatically admits them and their names must enter the member register; membership ends with directorship and is nontransferable. The filed constitution names no special membership class or named-person veto. Article24.2 gives each member one vote on a <strong>written</strong> resolution. Ordinary written decisions require a simple majority; special written resolutions at least75% of eligible voting rights. Removing a director or auditor through the statutory member-resolution route cannot use a written resolution (24.4, PDF15). Do not silently generalize the written-vote clause into a fully audited account of every statutory voting mechanism.</p>\n<p><strong>The board manages and can retract delegations.</strong> Articles9-12, PDF9/printed6, give directors general management authority. They can delegate functions and day-to-day work, permit further delegation, and change or terminate those arrangements. Committees cannot knowingly incur expenditure or liability without authorization or a board-approved budget (10.4). Board decisions normally use a majority at a quorate meeting; an eligible chair has a casting vote on a tie. Decisions without a meeting require a majority sharing the view, not unanimity (13,15.5,16; PDF10-11). Board quorum cannot be below two and otherwise defaults to two or one-third, whichever is greater (15.2).</p>\n<p><strong>Appointments and removals are collective powers in the text.</strong> Article20.2, PDF13/printed10, lets directors appoint eligible directors. Article21 includes specified cessation/removal grounds;21.6 permits a board removal resolution at a meeting attended by at least half the directors after14clear days&#x27; notice and an opportunity for representations. The constitution also recognizes statutory cessation/removal routes. It does not name Scott, Wood, a donor or an outside organization as sole appointer. Article19 says the company should seek always to have at least three directors; the public officers page lists two. That mismatch is a useful record question, not proof the two-person board&#x27;s decisions are invalid. The articles expressly allow limited appointments when the number falls below quorum.</p>\n<p><strong>Some matters are entrenched.</strong> Article8, PDF8/printed5, requires unanimity of eligible members to amend purposes, asset lock, winding-up provisions or the entrenchment article itself. Other special resolutions have the stated75% threshold. This is a real member-level reserved power. No donor-specific publication-clearance, budget-veto or board-appointment provision was identified in the complete articles; separate contracts could carry rights that this document does not disclose.</p>\n<h2 id=\"cross-entity-conflicts-an-actual-governance-bridge\">Cross-entity conflicts: an actual governance bridge</h2>\n<p>Schedule1, definition1.11, PDF19-20/printed16-17, expressly includes <strong>Reset Tech, Reset Tech Action, Reset Tech Australia Limited, Reset Tech GmbH and Reset Tech Action GmbH</strong> within its defined Group Company category, with further companies addable by members. This is an explicit constitutional list. It is not by itself proof of a parent/subsidiary relationship, consolidated ownership, each entity&#x27;s exact registry identity, or an instruction from the US entity to Australia.</p>\n<p>Article17, PDF11-12/printed8-9, requires declaration of direct/indirect transaction interests and conflicting duties. Potentially conflicted directors may ordinarily participate, count in the quorum and vote unless a majority of the other participating directors decides otherwise or the non-exempt personal-benefit rule applies. Article17.4.2&#x27;s exceptions include specified remuneration/expense decisions and decisions involving a defined Group Company with which a director is connected. Thus a group connection does <strong>not automatically require recusal under these articles</strong>. If17.5 applies, participation is limited to informing debate, the director is excluded from the relevant quorum and withdraws without voting. Whether any particular director disclosed, voted, was excluded or improperly benefited requires the actual decision record; statutory duties/enforceability were not independently audited.</p>\n<p>Definition1.8, PDF19, supplies a connection test involving specified equity/voting interests or statutory connected-person relationships. Do not substitute a shared conference, job title or common purpose for that definition. Article17.6 also permits specified withholding of confidential information where disclosure would breach another duty, after compliance with the conflict provisions. That is a permitted confidentiality boundary, not proof that information was withheld in any concrete case.</p>\n<h2 id=\"purpose-and-asset-limits\">Purpose and asset limits</h2>\n<p>The company is limited by guarantee without share capital. Article4 caps the member&#x27;s specified winding-up guarantee atGBP1; that is not a share price or the limit of all possible liabilities. Articles1-2 expressly authorize public-benefit technology/data-policy work, legislative advocacy and efforts to influence opinion and public institutions. That supplies a declared organizational purpose, not proof of a particular policy win.</p>\n<p>Articles3,6-8, PDF6-8, restrict private profit distribution and constrain assets/winding-up, with stated exceptions. Reasonable remuneration/services/rent/interest and director expenses are permitted; do not describe the organization as unable to pay insiders. Net winding-up assets cannot be distributed among members. Its non-share structure and these limits make an equity-ownership interpretation of the PSC percentages especially inappropriate.</p>\n<h2 id=\"psc-reconciliation-remains-open\">PSC reconciliation remains open</h2>\n<p>The [official officers page](http[local research file] lists Scott and Wood as the two active directors, both appointed5July2023. The [PSC page](http[local research file] lists Wood at more than25% up to50% of voting rights, notified7May2025; Scott at75% or more plus appointment/removal rights, notified5July2023. Wood&#x27;s original PSC01 repeats her voting band. These are reported control categories, not additive shareholding percentages. Companies House itself warns that it does not check the accuracy of filed information.</p>\n<p>If the two listed directors are the complete relevant membership, the new article22 membership rule plus one-member-one-written-vote rule gives an apparent equal written-vote structure. <strong>That conditional calculation is not a finding that the PSC register is definitively wrong or that all current rights are50/50.</strong> The constitution does not disclose how Scott&#x27;s broader registered control category is currently supported. A membership-rights transition associated with the May2025 replacement, stale/incomplete reporting, attribution through another arrangement or another unacquired rights instrument are possible explanations. The present records do not choose between them. The original pre-May2025 articles, current statutory member register, PSC basis/changes and any joint-voting or appointment arrangement would discriminate; they were not acquired in this bounded pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"suggested-typed-relations-and-next-record\">Suggested typed relations and next record</h2>\n<p>Use company14982650 → board for constitutional management/delegation; board → director/member role for appointment/admission; eligible members → entrenched provisions for unanimous amendment consent. Record UK company → each listed Group Company as <strong>defined constitutional grouping for conflict rules</strong>, not equity ownership or parent control. Scott → May2025 adoption is an observed resolution agreement. Keep PSC assertions as attributed register records pending reconciliation, separate from the constitution&#x27;s general rules. None establishes operational control of OSN merely because a network uses Reset services, or a donor veto over a funded article.</p>\n<p>The highest-information next record is the company&#x27;s current member register and the instrument explaining Scott&#x27;s registered appointment/voting rights after the new articles; the next operational record is a specific board delegation, conflict declaration/minute, or spending/publication approval connecting these powers to funded network work. Article29 requires minutes of appointments/resolutions/proceedings, and30 requires the member register and accounts. Their existence as required records is distinct from public availability. Root owns the next forest review; no outreach or subsequent acquisition branch was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-route-closure\">Custody and route closure</h2>\n<p>The web reader&#x27;s articles click returned an expired signed-S3 redirect; resolution and PSC01 clicks returned cache misses. One ordinary GET of each observed stable public filing endpoint succeeded, without reusing signed tokens. PDFs are scanned: pypdf returned no text and startxref repair warnings for articles/resolution. The bundled visual PDF renderer displayed all pages. An initial unavailable fitz import was replaced with already available pypdf/pypdfium2; no installation occurred. No repeated failed web route or access bypass was used.</p>\n<p>Retained originals under governance-wave-2026-09-09/originals:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>File</th>\n<th>Bytes</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>uk-articles-2025.pdf</td>\n<td>685147</td>\n<td>240587be6f798183ddcf3f651cd6dcdd3d208cbb71410761c7a89171942147da</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>uk-articles-resolution-2025.pdf</td>\n<td>44909</td>\n<td>7b3ba5028ece428b39984dffe269c708b947fbb7da1296f2fd49eedbdb110278</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>uk-articles-psc-notification-2025.pdf</td>\n<td>20825</td>\n<td>97c6aa6109c98696dd39bac685763ff827abb393312b716973571f961ccc87f8</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The same uk-articles prefixes identify derived page PNGs; they are visual-reading aids, not independent sources. No canonical case or other worker&#x27;s file was changed. This is the constitutional decision-rights breakpoint.</p>",
        "path": "governance-wave-2026-09-09/uk-governance-articles.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-uk-articles",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-resolution",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-psc",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-directors"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed9September2026. Bounded primary-filing review of company14982650, distinct from the informal Online Safety Network and from other Reset legal entities. The May2025 constitution reveals a director-member structure and an explicit cross-entity conflict provision. It does not reconcile the current PSC categories or establish donor control of policy outputs.\n\n## Instruments and reading scope\n\nCompanies House filing history records articles and adoption resolution filed21May2025. The resolution is headed7May2025 and replaces the previous articles immediately; it bears Dale Benjamin Scott's agreement as the voting member. Poppy Wood's PSC notification, filed19May2025, gives7May2025 as the date she became registrable. The resolution is evidence of this adoption decision, not a permanent personal veto. Its signature date is printed5/7/2025 alongside the explicit7May heading; do not reinterpret it as a later July action. A separate source anomaly is that its header prints company number4982650 while the official docket and attached articles identify14982650. Retain this discrepancy rather than silently correcting a quotation or inventing another company.\n\nOfficial filing history (see source references) Filed articles (see source references) Filed resolution (see source references) Wood PSC01 (see source references)\n\nAll20 articles pages, both resolution pages and both PSC01 pages were visually inspected as scans. The articles contain17 numbered substantive pages following a cover and two index pages; below, PDF page equals printed page plus3. Relevant role/date/control passages were read on current official officers and PSC pages; unrelated personal-data fields are excluded from this note. These official web reads were observed9September but their reader cache reports an earlier crawl; they are not a freshly certified member register.\n\n## Who can decide\n\n**Directors and members are the same constitutional constituency.** Article22, PDF14/printed11, makes directors the only members: appointment automatically admits them and their names must enter the member register; membership ends with directorship and is nontransferable. The filed constitution names no special membership class or named-person veto. Article24.2 gives each member one vote on a **written** resolution. Ordinary written decisions require a simple majority; special written resolutions at least75% of eligible voting rights. Removing a director or auditor through the statutory member-resolution route cannot use a written resolution (24.4, PDF15). Do not silently generalize the written-vote clause into a fully audited account of every statutory voting mechanism.\n\n**The board manages and can retract delegations.** Articles9-12, PDF9/printed6, give directors general management authority. They can delegate functions and day-to-day work, permit further delegation, and change or terminate those arrangements. Committees cannot knowingly incur expenditure or liability without authorization or a board-approved budget (10.4). Board decisions normally use a majority at a quorate meeting; an eligible chair has a casting vote on a tie. Decisions without a meeting require a majority sharing the view, not unanimity (13,15.5,16; PDF10-11). Board quorum cannot be below two and otherwise defaults to two or one-third, whichever is greater (15.2).\n\n**Appointments and removals are collective powers in the text.** Article20.2, PDF13/printed10, lets directors appoint eligible directors. Article21 includes specified cessation/removal grounds;21.6 permits a board removal resolution at a meeting attended by at least half the directors after14clear days' notice and an opportunity for representations. The constitution also recognizes statutory cessation/removal routes. It does not name Scott, Wood, a donor or an outside organization as sole appointer. Article19 says the company should seek always to have at least three directors; the public officers page lists two. That mismatch is a useful record question, not proof the two-person board's decisions are invalid. The articles expressly allow limited appointments when the number falls below quorum.\n\n**Some matters are entrenched.** Article8, PDF8/printed5, requires unanimity of eligible members to amend purposes, asset lock, winding-up provisions or the entrenchment article itself. Other special resolutions have the stated75% threshold. This is a real member-level reserved power. No donor-specific publication-clearance, budget-veto or board-appointment provision was identified in the complete articles; separate contracts could carry rights that this document does not disclose.\n\n## Cross-entity conflicts: an actual governance bridge\n\nSchedule1, definition1.11, PDF19-20/printed16-17, expressly includes **Reset Tech, Reset Tech Action, Reset Tech Australia Limited, Reset Tech GmbH and Reset Tech Action GmbH** within its defined Group Company category, with further companies addable by members. This is an explicit constitutional list. It is not by itself proof of a parent/subsidiary relationship, consolidated ownership, each entity's exact registry identity, or an instruction from the US entity to Australia.\n\nArticle17, PDF11-12/printed8-9, requires declaration of direct/indirect transaction interests and conflicting duties. Potentially conflicted directors may ordinarily participate, count in the quorum and vote unless a majority of the other participating directors decides otherwise or the non-exempt personal-benefit rule applies. Article17.4.2's exceptions include specified remuneration/expense decisions and decisions involving a defined Group Company with which a director is connected. Thus a group connection does **not automatically require recusal under these articles**. If17.5 applies, participation is limited to informing debate, the director is excluded from the relevant quorum and withdraws without voting. Whether any particular director disclosed, voted, was excluded or improperly benefited requires the actual decision record; statutory duties/enforceability were not independently audited.\n\nDefinition1.8, PDF19, supplies a connection test involving specified equity/voting interests or statutory connected-person relationships. Do not substitute a shared conference, job title or common purpose for that definition. Article17.6 also permits specified withholding of confidential information where disclosure would breach another duty, after compliance with the conflict provisions. That is a permitted confidentiality boundary, not proof that information was withheld in any concrete case.\n\n## Purpose and asset limits\n\nThe company is limited by guarantee without share capital. Article4 caps the member's specified winding-up guarantee atGBP1; that is not a share price or the limit of all possible liabilities. Articles1-2 expressly authorize public-benefit technology/data-policy work, legislative advocacy and efforts to influence opinion and public institutions. That supplies a declared organizational purpose, not proof of a particular policy win.\n\nArticles3,6-8, PDF6-8, restrict private profit distribution and constrain assets/winding-up, with stated exceptions. Reasonable remuneration/services/rent/interest and director expenses are permitted; do not describe the organization as unable to pay insiders. Net winding-up assets cannot be distributed among members. Its non-share structure and these limits make an equity-ownership interpretation of the PSC percentages especially inappropriate.\n\n## PSC reconciliation remains open\n\nThe official officers page (see source references) lists Scott and Wood as the two active directors, both appointed5July2023. The PSC page (see source references) lists Wood at more than25% up to50% of voting rights, notified7May2025; Scott at75% or more plus appointment/removal rights, notified5July2023. Wood's original PSC01 repeats her voting band. These are reported control categories, not additive shareholding percentages. Companies House itself warns that it does not check the accuracy of filed information.\n\nIf the two listed directors are the complete relevant membership, the new article22 membership rule plus one-member-one-written-vote rule gives an apparent equal written-vote structure. **That conditional calculation is not a finding that the PSC register is definitively wrong or that all current rights are50/50.** The constitution does not disclose how Scott's broader registered control category is currently supported. A membership-rights transition associated with the May2025 replacement, stale/incomplete reporting, attribution through another arrangement or another unacquired rights instrument are possible explanations. The present records do not choose between them. The original pre-May2025 articles, current statutory member register, PSC basis/changes and any joint-voting or appointment arrangement would discriminate; they were not acquired in this bounded pass.\n\n## Suggested typed relations and next record\n\nUse company14982650 → board for constitutional management/delegation; board → director/member role for appointment/admission; eligible members → entrenched provisions for unanimous amendment consent. Record UK company → each listed Group Company as **defined constitutional grouping for conflict rules**, not equity ownership or parent control. Scott → May2025 adoption is an observed resolution agreement. Keep PSC assertions as attributed register records pending reconciliation, separate from the constitution's general rules. None establishes operational control of OSN merely because a network uses Reset services, or a donor veto over a funded article.\n\nThe highest-information next record is the company's current member register and the instrument explaining Scott's registered appointment/voting rights after the new articles; the next operational record is a specific board delegation, conflict declaration/minute, or spending/publication approval connecting these powers to funded network work. Article29 requires minutes of appointments/resolutions/proceedings, and30 requires the member register and accounts. Their existence as required records is distinct from public availability. Root owns the next forest review; no outreach or subsequent acquisition branch was opened.\n\n## Custody and route closure\n\nThe web reader's articles click returned an expired signed-S3 redirect; resolution and PSC01 clicks returned cache misses. One ordinary GET of each observed stable public filing endpoint succeeded, without reusing signed tokens. PDFs are scanned: pypdf returned no text and startxref repair warnings for articles/resolution. The bundled visual PDF renderer displayed all pages. An initial unavailable fitz import was replaced with already available pypdf/pypdfium2; no installation occurred. No repeated failed web route or access bypass was used.\n\nRetained originals under governance-wave-2026-09-09/originals:\n\n| File | Bytes | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| uk-articles-2025.pdf | 685147 | 240587be6f798183ddcf3f651cd6dcdd3d208cbb71410761c7a89171942147da |\n| uk-articles-resolution-2025.pdf | 44909 | 7b3ba5028ece428b39984dffe269c708b947fbb7da1296f2fd49eedbdb110278 |\n| uk-articles-psc-notification-2025.pdf | 20825 | 97c6aa6109c98696dd39bac685763ff827abb393312b716973571f961ccc87f8 |\n\nThe same uk-articles prefixes identify derived page PNGs; they are visual-reading aids, not independent sources. No canonical case or other worker's file was changed. This is the constitutional decision-rights breakpoint.\n",
        "file": "research/governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-governance-articles.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator",
        "title": "Online Safety Network operator and Reset UK company records",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Public institutional records and scoped visual inspection of the original 2024 company accounts. This packet establishes operational custody and several corporate disclosure boundaries. It does not establish donor instructions, a network-specific budget or exercised control over a particular policy recommendation.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Public institutional records and scoped visual inspection of the original 2024 company accounts. This packet establishes operational custody and several corporate disclosure boundaries. It does not establish donor instructions, a network-specific budget or exercised control over a particular policy recommendation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-maintains-the-network\">Who maintains the network</h2>\n<p>The [Online Safety Network privacy notice](http[local research file] says the network has no formal membership or association. Reset Tech operates its website, newsletter and shared email inbox. This is an explicit operational relationship, stronger than inferred affiliation. The notice covers network activity and identifies a federation of Reset legal entities, including Reset Tech UK Limited. It describes them as a single organization for the notice&#x27;s purposes, with shared staff and systems. That wording is not a legal merger, a corporate ownership tree or proof that the UK company alone contracts for every network expense.</p>\n<p>The notice describes records of professional contacts, expertise, opinions, correspondence, meeting notes, workshops and roundtables. Individual organizations&#x27; conversations outside the shared inbox are governed by their own notices. Mailchimp handles the newsletter; listed website providers include Matomo, Heroku and Cloudflare. Conditional provisions permit sharing with co-funders or transferring the network/site to another organization. They do not establish that a particular transfer or disclosure occurred. Last updated is labelled October 2025 despite the currently displayed network name; do not date every sentence to a verified 2026 revision.</p>\n<p>An important counterconstraint is explicit advice that readers concerned about government surveillance may use Tor or VPNs. The notice also states a 48-hour technical-data retention rule with testing/security exceptions. These are stated policies, not independently verified practice, but they are inconsistent with attributing an undifferentiated anti-anonymity doctrine to every aspect of this organization.</p>\n<p>The [general Reset privacy notice](http[local research file] separately describes partner onboarding, sanctions checks via Plaid Monitor, human review, grant-progress records and information systems. It says partner funding records are retained for ten years after funding ends. These provisions identify types of records likely to exist and possible custodians; no particular grant file has been obtained. Sanctions screening is not evidence of ideological vetting. These general partner terms must not be substituted for an OSN contract.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-identifiable-uk-company\">The identifiable UK company</h2>\n<p>The [Companies House overview](http[local research file] identifies RESET TECH UK LIMITED, company 14982650, incorporated 5 July 2023, as a company limited by guarantee without share capital. The fresh [filing history](http[local research file] includes 2026 filings absent from an older indexed view. Accounts to 31 December 2025 are due 30 September 2026 and were not yet overdue at observation.</p>\n<p>The [PSC register](http[local research file] lists Poppy Wood with more than 25% but no more than 50% of voting rights, and Dale Benjamin Scott with at least 75% and a right to appoint/remove directors. Report these as separate register statements, not additive equity percentages. The company has no share capital. Membership, timing or arrangements need reconciliation against the constitution and member register; the apparent discrepancy is not proof of misconduct. The companion uk-governance-articles.md reads the actual constitutional provisions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-2024-accounts-expose-and-leave-unresolved\">What the 2024 accounts expose and leave unresolved</h2>\n<p>The official [2024 accounts PDF](http[local research file] filed 24 September 2025, reports GBP 1,571,393 turnover; GBP 70,631 operating expenses; GBP 1,451,987 administration expenses; and GBP 39,507 after-tax profit. These are whole-company figures, not OSN costs or identified donor receipts. The source&#x27;s pretax/tax/after-tax printed numbers differ arithmetically by one pound; figures are preserved rather than corrected. No material inference is made from the difference.</p>\n<p>Note 4 breaks administration expenses into salaries/wages/payroll GBP 76,881; benefits/insurance GBP 122,254; professional/consulting services GBP 402,105; subscriptions/software GBP 47,504; travel GBP 17,557; and other expenses GBP 785,686. The statement says five employees during 2024, without establishing five full-time equivalents for the whole year. It would be misleading to calculate an average annual salary by division. Expense names alone do not resolve outsourced staff, group recharge or grant pass-through amounts.</p>\n<p>Year-end cash is GBP 40,997 in HSBC UK accounts. This identifies a banking relationship, not bank direction over advocacy. Note 7 puts GBP 1,156 receivable from Reset Tech Action gGmbH and GBP 10,743 directors&#x27; loan under debtors. The latter is owed to the company, not a director&#x27;s funding contribution; individual identity and terms are not disclosed there. The named intercompany receivable is a concrete accounting relation, but does not identify all group transactions or establish parent control.</p>\n<p>Note 9 records members&#x27; contingent GBP 1 winding-up guarantee. This is not invested capital or a measure of voting power. Note 11 says the company avails itself of FRS 102 section 33.1A exemption for disclosure of transactions with group undertakings. Note 1 claims the small-company cash-flow statement exemption. Report what the accounts invoke; the applicability of each exemption has not been independently audited. These provisions explain specific disclosure limits, not unlawful concealment. The filing does not provide a complete donor-to-project cash trail.</p>\n<p>The accounts name Scott and Wood as directors and are approved 17 September 2025. Root visually inspected physical PDF pages 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; printed pages are one lower. These cover the directors, directors&#x27; narrative, signatures/responsibilities, income statement, accounting policies, expenses, debtors and related-party notes. No external audit opinion is claimed. Scanned pages have no usable pypdf text; the local text file contains page markers only and must not be treated as OCR.</p>\n<h2 id=\"evidential-consequence\">Evidential consequence</h2>\n<p>The supported path is informal collaboration hosted through Reset&#x27;s shared operating infrastructure, with identifiable UK company directors, constitutional decision rules and some group accounting relations. It is not yet a demonstrated single legal entity controlling all federated activity. The missing records with high value are the OSN operating/transition agreement, division of employer and contracting responsibilities, related-party service arrangements, member register and basis for PSC notices, plus any network budget or delegated editorial authority. Public procedures make these plausible targets but do not prove a particular document or clause exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-custody\">Acquisition custody</h2>\n<p>The network notice was read both through indexed primary text and an ordinary successful GET, then locally extracted with scripts/navigation removed. The official accounts link initially produced a stale expired signed redirect in the web reader. One ordinary GET of the observed stable public Companies House endpoint succeeded; no credentials, access restrictions or signed-token reuse were involved. The original is retained. No new OCR dependency was installed. Rendered PNGs are for document inspection, not artwork.</p>",
        "path": "governance-wave-2026-09-09/uk-network-operator.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w12-gov-s-osn-notice",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-overview",
          "w12-gov-s-uk-accounts"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Public institutional records and scoped visual inspection of the original 2024 company accounts. This packet establishes operational custody and several corporate disclosure boundaries. It does not establish donor instructions, a network-specific budget or exercised control over a particular policy recommendation.\n\n## Who maintains the network\n\nThe Online Safety Network privacy notice (see source references) says the network has no formal membership or association. Reset Tech operates its website, newsletter and shared email inbox. This is an explicit operational relationship, stronger than inferred affiliation. The notice covers network activity and identifies a federation of Reset legal entities, including Reset Tech UK Limited. It describes them as a single organization for the notice's purposes, with shared staff and systems. That wording is not a legal merger, a corporate ownership tree or proof that the UK company alone contracts for every network expense.\n\nThe notice describes records of professional contacts, expertise, opinions, correspondence, meeting notes, workshops and roundtables. Individual organizations' conversations outside the shared inbox are governed by their own notices. Mailchimp handles the newsletter; listed website providers include Matomo, Heroku and Cloudflare. Conditional provisions permit sharing with co-funders or transferring the network/site to another organization. They do not establish that a particular transfer or disclosure occurred. Last updated is labelled October 2025 despite the currently displayed network name; do not date every sentence to a verified 2026 revision.\n\nAn important counterconstraint is explicit advice that readers concerned about government surveillance may use Tor or VPNs. The notice also states a 48-hour technical-data retention rule with testing/security exceptions. These are stated policies, not independently verified practice, but they are inconsistent with attributing an undifferentiated anti-anonymity doctrine to every aspect of this organization.\n\nThe general Reset privacy notice (see source references) separately describes partner onboarding, sanctions checks via Plaid Monitor, human review, grant-progress records and information systems. It says partner funding records are retained for ten years after funding ends. These provisions identify types of records likely to exist and possible custodians; no particular grant file has been obtained. Sanctions screening is not evidence of ideological vetting. These general partner terms must not be substituted for an OSN contract.\n\n## The identifiable UK company\n\nThe Companies House overview (see source references) identifies RESET TECH UK LIMITED, company 14982650, incorporated 5 July 2023, as a company limited by guarantee without share capital. The fresh filing history (see source references) includes 2026 filings absent from an older indexed view. Accounts to 31 December 2025 are due 30 September 2026 and were not yet overdue at observation.\n\nThe PSC register (see source references) lists Poppy Wood with more than 25% but no more than 50% of voting rights, and Dale Benjamin Scott with at least 75% and a right to appoint/remove directors. Report these as separate register statements, not additive equity percentages. The company has no share capital. Membership, timing or arrangements need reconciliation against the constitution and member register; the apparent discrepancy is not proof of misconduct. The companion uk-governance-articles.md reads the actual constitutional provisions.\n\n## What the 2024 accounts expose and leave unresolved\n\nThe official 2024 accounts PDF (see source references) filed 24 September 2025, reports GBP 1,571,393 turnover; GBP 70,631 operating expenses; GBP 1,451,987 administration expenses; and GBP 39,507 after-tax profit. These are whole-company figures, not OSN costs or identified donor receipts. The source's pretax/tax/after-tax printed numbers differ arithmetically by one pound; figures are preserved rather than corrected. No material inference is made from the difference.\n\nNote 4 breaks administration expenses into salaries/wages/payroll GBP 76,881; benefits/insurance GBP 122,254; professional/consulting services GBP 402,105; subscriptions/software GBP 47,504; travel GBP 17,557; and other expenses GBP 785,686. The statement says five employees during 2024, without establishing five full-time equivalents for the whole year. It would be misleading to calculate an average annual salary by division. Expense names alone do not resolve outsourced staff, group recharge or grant pass-through amounts.\n\nYear-end cash is GBP 40,997 in HSBC UK accounts. This identifies a banking relationship, not bank direction over advocacy. Note 7 puts GBP 1,156 receivable from Reset Tech Action gGmbH and GBP 10,743 directors' loan under debtors. The latter is owed to the company, not a director's funding contribution; individual identity and terms are not disclosed there. The named intercompany receivable is a concrete accounting relation, but does not identify all group transactions or establish parent control.\n\nNote 9 records members' contingent GBP 1 winding-up guarantee. This is not invested capital or a measure of voting power. Note 11 says the company avails itself of FRS 102 section 33.1A exemption for disclosure of transactions with group undertakings. Note 1 claims the small-company cash-flow statement exemption. Report what the accounts invoke; the applicability of each exemption has not been independently audited. These provisions explain specific disclosure limits, not unlawful concealment. The filing does not provide a complete donor-to-project cash trail.\n\nThe accounts name Scott and Wood as directors and are approved 17 September 2025. Root visually inspected physical PDF pages 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; printed pages are one lower. These cover the directors, directors' narrative, signatures/responsibilities, income statement, accounting policies, expenses, debtors and related-party notes. No external audit opinion is claimed. Scanned pages have no usable pypdf text; the local text file contains page markers only and must not be treated as OCR.\n\n## Evidential consequence\n\nThe supported path is informal collaboration hosted through Reset's shared operating infrastructure, with identifiable UK company directors, constitutional decision rules and some group accounting relations. It is not yet a demonstrated single legal entity controlling all federated activity. The missing records with high value are the OSN operating/transition agreement, division of employer and contracting responsibilities, related-party service arrangements, member register and basis for PSC notices, plus any network budget or delegated editorial authority. Public procedures make these plausible targets but do not prove a particular document or clause exists.\n\n## Acquisition custody\n\nThe network notice was read both through indexed primary text and an ordinary successful GET, then locally extracted with scripts/navigation removed. The official accounts link initially produced a stale expired signed redirect in the web reader. One ordinary GET of the observed stable public Companies House endpoint succeeded; no credentials, access restrictions or signed-token reuse were involved. The original is retained. No new OCR dependency was installed. Rendered PNGs are for document inspection, not artwork.\n",
        "file": "research/governance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-network-operator.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning",
        "title": "Who instructs NSOIT's monitoring suppliers?",
        "description": "Bounded implementation investigation, 9 September 2026. The anchor remains DSIT's published 5 February 2025 payment, GBP 56,736, transaction 654609, to Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd. No record inspected here joins that payment to a particular report, monitoring specification or older contract. See the preceding commercial-participant.md and its original CSV; the p",
        "html": "<p>Bounded implementation investigation, 9 September 2026. The anchor remains DSIT&#x27;s published <strong>5 February 2025 payment, GBP 56,736, transaction 654609</strong>, to Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd. No record inspected here joins that payment to a particular report, monitoring specification or older contract. See the preceding commercial-participant.md and its retained original CSV; the payment is not counted again.</p>\n<p>The newly visible mechanism is ministerial scope-setting, departmental commissioning and assessment, supplier analysis, then platform review under private terms. An acquired draft policy specifies documented instructions and agreed search methods for contractors. Contemporary parliamentary testimony describes both referrals and warnings about lawful content. The exact escalation approvals and classification thresholds remain partly redacted, and an executed Crisp SOW remains unestablished.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-instruction-instrument-with-its-status-intact\">The instruction instrument, with its status intact</h2>\n<p>A public FOI-associated copy of the <strong>National Security and Online Information Team Data Protection and Compliance Policy</strong> supplies detailed instructions. It is hosted by Big Brother Watch at a path identifying FOI2024-00576 and May 2024. Every page is marked <strong>DRAFT, OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE</strong>. No approval date, signed adoption, final revision or incorporation into the February 2025 engagement was established. Describe the following as provisions of this acquired draft, rather than proof every analyst or supplier followed them. [Publicly hosted policy copy](http[local research file]</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Who / decision</th>\n<th>Draft provision</th>\n<th>Exact PDF locator and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>NSOIT or central government: commission work</td>\n<td>NSOIT may commission within its remit or be tasked through central command structures, with Cabinet Office National Security Secretariat given as an example. Sustained monitoring requires appropriate ministerial agreement.</td>\n<td>§3.2, PDF 4. This is a route for tasking, not an actual task order.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NSOIT Analysis team: assess a task</td>\n<td>Every collection activity must have a legitimate policy objective, be proportionate, meet data-protection requirements and avoid directed surveillance.</td>\n<td>§3.3, PDF 4; §§3.7–3.9, PDF 5.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DSIT: instruct and onboard suppliers</td>\n<td>Delivery partners must follow NSOIT instructions. DSIT takes controller responsibility where it processes personal data; third parties are to be processors under Article 28, operating on documented instructions. Legal, Commercial and Operational Data teams participate in onboarding.</td>\n<td>§§3.4–3.6, PDF 4–5. This does not identify which Crisp entity signed any agreement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NSOIT and partner: agree methods</td>\n<td>Case-specific methodology must cover data sources, search terms, task subject/purpose and minimisation. Contractual assurance and periodic review are specified.</td>\n<td>§3.6(b)–(d), PDF 5. The actual search dictionary, classification specification and completed assurance record were not acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Analysts: collection limits</td>\n<td>Publicly accessible sources only; no name-based searching or building a picture of private individuals/groups by following activity. These instructions are to be communicated to partners.</td>\n<td>§3.1, PDF 4; Schedule 1, PDF 9. The draft permits access to public sites requiring login, while prohibiting fake personas. Schedule 2 Part B §§1.4–1.6, PDF 15.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NSOIT: decide on referral</td>\n<td>Teams identify potentially harmful material within ministerially agreed remit. NSOIT reviews against agreed thresholds. Authorized content may be shared for platforms to act at their discretion, with information minimised.</td>\n<td>§§4.1–4.2, PDF 7. The threshold and authorization detail is partly blacked out: do not invent a named approving officer or automatic approval rule.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Politicians, news sources and journalists: an exclusion</td>\n<td>The draft excludes their content from platform referrals; its journalist definition depends on a news-publishing entity, editorial control and other institutional criteria.</td>\n<td>§§1.6–1.7, PDF 3; §4.2(b), PDF 7; Schedule 1, PDF 9. This is not a blanket exemption for every citizen publishing commentary.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Head of NSOIT and DPO: exceptional retention</td>\n<td>Raw samples normally up to three months; output retention/review and justified extensions involve the Head and Data Protection Officer. Thematic leads manage expiry of escalation links.</td>\n<td>§3.13, PDF 6; §4.4(A), PDF 7; Schedule 2 §2.5, PDF 13. It does not show retention complied with in an actual case.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Legal advisers: surveillance boundary</td>\n<td>The draft says DSIT has no directed-surveillance RIPA authorization; activity risking that threshold must not be authorized and uncertainty goes to legal advisers.</td>\n<td>Schedule 2 Part B §§1.5–1.6, PDF 15. This is the draft&#x27;s legal/operational account, not an independent determination about each collection.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The data-collection checklist, Schedule 3, PDF 16–19, is almost entirely redacted. PDF 7 also visibly blacks out portions of escalation and review procedure. These are real redactions, confirmed visually at PDF 7 and 16, not merely failed text extraction. The draft says a DPIA has been completed and is regularly reviewed (Schedule 2 Part A §2.2(d), PDF 11); the actual DPIA and its conclusions were not acquired. No attempt was made to recover redacted text.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-current-public-accounts-corroborate\">What current public accounts corroborate</h2>\n<p>In <strong>HL3811, answered 30 April 2024</strong>, the government says DSIT has platform trusted-flagger status and may refer material within ministerial steers/remit that appears to violate platform terms; platforms decide the outcome. This establishes the department&#x27;s publicly described referral channel, without proving a DSA statutory designation. [Answer](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>HL7610, answered 3 June 2025</strong>, identifies foreign-state threats, election risks and AI/deepfakes among the team&#x27;s subjects, with ministers agreeing high-risk work. <strong>9335, answered 22 June 2026</strong>, restates the public-safety/national-security remit and continuing ministerial review. Neither answer publishes a commissioned topic list, the exact search terms or referral threshold scores. [2025 answer](http[local research file] [2026 answer](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The current official privacy notice names DSIT as controller. It describes aggregate analysis of public information, incidental personal/special-category data, minimisation, no private-page review and no automated decision-making/profiling. It describes platform referrals, public-interest processing bases, retention limits and DPO/ICO complaint routes. It now names <strong>The Global Strategy Network Limited</strong> as an appointed analysis contractor. This is not an exclusive-provider statement, proof Crisp was replaced, or a specification for the February 2025 payment. The page displays publication on16 April 2024, but a revision date for this contractor paragraph was not established. Do not backdate the current wording. [Notice, controller, purpose, sharing, retention and rights sections](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The distinction between public trend analysis and processing individual posts must stay visible: the policy&#x27;s stated restrictions do not mean personal data is never processed. Equally, the existence of handles, links or political opinions in collected public content does not alone prove an individualized surveillance programme.</p>\n<h2 id=\"actual-supplier-output-and-disclosure-review\">Actual supplier output and disclosure review</h2>\n<p><strong>ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4, 11 November 2025</strong>, confirms a request for Crisp reports within the week beginning 24 June 2024. DSIT said all but one had been deleted under retention policy; on 24 October 2025 it partially disclosed the remaining report and released a June referral count of ten (§§8–14, PDF 2–3). The ICO inspected the unredacted report (§18). DSIT described keyword tracking, behavioural analytics, platform strategies and threat-identification criteria (§36, PDF 11–14). Those are attributed submissions, not methods personally inspected here. The Commissioner upheld the remaining national-security redactions after considering public interest (§§39–43, PDF 15), with tribunal appeal available (§44, PDF 16). This is independent review of disclosure, not certification of NSOIT&#x27;s operating legality. The underlying report, its exact date and any invoice linkage remain unread. Paragraph 36 calls it the week of the general election; that wording must not silently replace the request&#x27;s week beginning 24 June 2024. [Original decision](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"referral-lawful-speech-and-the-limits-of-oversight\">Referral, lawful speech and the limits of oversight</h2>\n<p>The <strong>14 April 2026 parliamentary hearing</strong>, Q25–30, PDF 8–11, supplies an unusually explicit operating account. Minister Kanishka Narayan described a public-safety/national-security threshold, declined the requested activity/removal figures, and offered future briefings subject to security constraints. At Q29, Talitha Rowland described Southport-era monitoring of lawful but harmful narratives, early warnings even before content appeared on a platform, and requests for review against each platform&#x27;s own terms. She distinguished that work from law enforcement&#x27;s illegal-content response. At Q30 she said they lacked specific foreign-interference indicators at the time; do not recast this example as proven foreign-state content. This supports a government-to-platform influence channel affecting lawful material, while platforms retain the described action decision. It does not demonstrate a removal order, Crisp&#x27;s role in that example, or the resulting removal rate. [Hearing, Q25–30](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The Science, Innovation and Technology Committee&#x27;s <strong>July 2025 report</strong>, §§60–62, recommended statutory footing and Intelligence and Security Committee oversight. Its October government response, received 18 September and published 17 October 2025, instead defended ministerial oversight, existing parliamentary questioning, FOI and subject-access routes; it did not commit to the requested statutory/ISC reform. A general commitment to accountability is therefore not acceptance of that institutional safeguard. [Committee §62](http[local research file] [response, Appendix 1, Disinformation Campaigns, reply to §62](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>This is not an absence-of-all-review finding: MPs questioned ministers, the ICO examined withheld material, and stated data-rights routes exist. The missing layer is a published independent operational audit and the actual task/approval records needed to test compliance. Nor does the government&#x27;s statement that platforms decide action settle the separate question of how official flagging, privileged access and regulatory relationships influence those decisions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relations-and-the-discriminating-gap\">Candidate relations and the discriminating gap</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate ID</th>\n<th>Typed relation</th>\n<th>Evidence stage</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-ministers</td>\n<td>DSIT ministers → NSOIT: set/review remit</td>\n<td>Public ministerial account, 2025 and 2026.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-tasking</td>\n<td>NSOIT / Cabinet Office NSS → collection activity: proposed tasking route</td>\n<td>Acquired disclosed draft §3.2; no actual order.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-partner-instructions</td>\n<td>DSIT/NSOIT → delivery partners: documented instruction/method agreement</td>\n<td>Draft §§3.5–3.6; applicability to paid Crisp engagement unestablished.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-crisp-report</td>\n<td>Crisp → NSOIT: produced report</td>\n<td>Independent disclosure adjudication; report itself unread.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-platform-referral</td>\n<td>NSOIT → platforms: flags or warns for terms review</td>\n<td>Departmental accounts, 2024 and 2026; voluntary action described.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-ico-review</td>\n<td>ICO → DSIT disclosure decision: upheld remaining redactions</td>\n<td>11 November 2025; not an operational audit.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-oversight-request</td>\n<td>Committee → government: requests statutory/ISC oversight</td>\n<td>July 2025 recommendation; response offers existing channels without commitment to requested reform.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-e-current-contractor</td>\n<td>NSOIT → Global Strategy Network Ltd: reports appointment for analysis</td>\n<td>Current notice; appointment date and exact contract unestablished.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The strongest rival to a private supplier choosing what citizens may say is an instructed contractor performing bounded public-source analysis, with government retaining tasking/referral responsibility and platforms retaining action. The strongest concern supported by these records is more specific: a government-selected monitoring and privileged referral process can reach lawful material, while precise criteria and authorization steps are not fully visible and a proposed stronger oversight structure was not adopted in the inspected response.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is the executed SOW/data-processing schedule/tasking instruction and completed assessment matching transaction 654609, followed by the escalation log and platform response for a specified case. A published final compliance policy, its adoption/version history, the DPIA and an independent assurance report would test whether the draft&#x27;s constraints actually governed delivery. Likely holders are DSIT Commercial, NSOIT, the Operational Data/DPO team and the actual supplier. These are precise public-record gaps, not a claim that the records do not exist. No outreach was undertaken. Acquisition stops here for forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-access-limits\">Source custody and access limits</h2>\n<p>The original payment remains in the prior wave. This wave retained the following bytes; .txt files are extraction derivatives, not originals. The capture manifest is commission-captures.json.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source/file</th>\n<th>Capture and SHA-256</th>\n<th>Reading scope / state</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-ico-decision.pdf</td>\n<td>2026-09-09T09:01:46Z; 172637 bytes;1e33d2fcaa65f09cb4d045b04f85689e65db3779604fdcaa2e175477acd3ae56</td>\n<td>Full 16-page original text read, scoped findings above.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-privacy.html</td>\n<td>2026-09-09T09:01:46Z; 96332 bytes;5891f9aa42d6c159d0c1a8b34ad286bbe536a53d93c94dcada1f3c46d3f5690c</td>\n<td>Complete substantive current notice read through official reader; original HTML retained.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commission-compliance-redacted.pdf</td>\n<td>2026-09-09T09:03:33Z; 264507 bytes;af10011b6bab2a29cc2c59225b9100aa37a9a9df3e14176dea5abcfbe8b26a79</td>\n<td>Full 19-page available text read; PDF 7 and 16 visually inspected. Public FOI-associated custodian copy; marked draft; no underlying DSIT file comparison.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2026 oral hearing</td>\n<td>Exact parliamentary URL above; reader turn985view2 / turn987view1–4</td>\n<td>Q25–30 plus institutional context Q7 read. Ordinary GET 403; no original retained and no retry.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025 committee report / response</td>\n<td>Exact URLs above; report §§60–62; response metadata and relevant reply</td>\n<td>Primary reader text read; response ordinary GET 403. No original retained, no retry.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Parliamentary answers</td>\n<td>HL3811, HL7610, 9335 exact URLs above</td>\n<td>Complete question and answer text read through official reader.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The BBW PDF reader initially returned a one-line &#x27;One moment, please...&#x27; page. One ordinary GET substitute succeeded with an actual PDF; no challenge solving or access-control evasion occurred. The prior Contracts Finder 403, ACNC restriction and other closed routes were not retried. Searches also surfaced unrelated MOD &#x27;New Style of IT&#x27; records; these were excluded because the acronym denotes a different programme. Additional spending months were not opened or totalled. No WEF taxonomy specification, supplier-controlled censorship right or February 2025 invoice match was found in the inspected material.</p>",
        "path": "implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09/uk-commissioning.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-ico-disclosure",
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-draft-policy",
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-privacy",
          "w15-impl-s-nsoit-oral",
          "w15-impl-s-trusted-flagger",
          "w15-impl-s-minister-scope",
          "w15-impl-s-remit-review",
          "w15-impl-s-oversight-request",
          "w15-impl-s-oversight-response"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded implementation investigation, 9 September 2026. The anchor remains DSIT's published **5 February 2025 payment, GBP 56,736, transaction 654609**, to Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd. No record inspected here joins that payment to a particular report, monitoring specification or older contract. See the preceding commercial-participant.md and its retained original CSV; the payment is not counted again.\n\nThe newly visible mechanism is ministerial scope-setting, departmental commissioning and assessment, supplier analysis, then platform review under private terms. An acquired draft policy specifies documented instructions and agreed search methods for contractors. Contemporary parliamentary testimony describes both referrals and warnings about lawful content. The exact escalation approvals and classification thresholds remain partly redacted, and an executed Crisp SOW remains unestablished.\n\n## The instruction instrument, with its status intact\n\nA public FOI-associated copy of the **National Security and Online Information Team Data Protection and Compliance Policy** supplies detailed instructions. It is hosted by Big Brother Watch at a path identifying FOI2024-00576 and May 2024. Every page is marked **DRAFT, OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE**. No approval date, signed adoption, final revision or incorporation into the February 2025 engagement was established. Describe the following as provisions of this acquired draft, rather than proof every analyst or supplier followed them. Publicly hosted policy copy (see source references)\n\n| Who / decision | Draft provision | Exact PDF locator and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| NSOIT or central government: commission work | NSOIT may commission within its remit or be tasked through central command structures, with Cabinet Office National Security Secretariat given as an example. Sustained monitoring requires appropriate ministerial agreement. | §3.2, PDF 4. This is a route for tasking, not an actual task order. |\n| NSOIT Analysis team: assess a task | Every collection activity must have a legitimate policy objective, be proportionate, meet data-protection requirements and avoid directed surveillance. | §3.3, PDF 4; §§3.7–3.9, PDF 5. |\n| DSIT: instruct and onboard suppliers | Delivery partners must follow NSOIT instructions. DSIT takes controller responsibility where it processes personal data; third parties are to be processors under Article 28, operating on documented instructions. Legal, Commercial and Operational Data teams participate in onboarding. | §§3.4–3.6, PDF 4–5. This does not identify which Crisp entity signed any agreement. |\n| NSOIT and partner: agree methods | Case-specific methodology must cover data sources, search terms, task subject/purpose and minimisation. Contractual assurance and periodic review are specified. | §3.6(b)–(d), PDF 5. The actual search dictionary, classification specification and completed assurance record were not acquired. |\n| Analysts: collection limits | Publicly accessible sources only; no name-based searching or building a picture of private individuals/groups by following activity. These instructions are to be communicated to partners. | §3.1, PDF 4; Schedule 1, PDF 9. The draft permits access to public sites requiring login, while prohibiting fake personas. Schedule 2 Part B §§1.4–1.6, PDF 15. |\n| NSOIT: decide on referral | Teams identify potentially harmful material within ministerially agreed remit. NSOIT reviews against agreed thresholds. Authorized content may be shared for platforms to act at their discretion, with information minimised. | §§4.1–4.2, PDF 7. The threshold and authorization detail is partly blacked out: do not invent a named approving officer or automatic approval rule. |\n| Politicians, news sources and journalists: an exclusion | The draft excludes their content from platform referrals; its journalist definition depends on a news-publishing entity, editorial control and other institutional criteria. | §§1.6–1.7, PDF 3; §4.2(b), PDF 7; Schedule 1, PDF 9. This is not a blanket exemption for every citizen publishing commentary. |\n| Head of NSOIT and DPO: exceptional retention | Raw samples normally up to three months; output retention/review and justified extensions involve the Head and Data Protection Officer. Thematic leads manage expiry of escalation links. | §3.13, PDF 6; §4.4(A), PDF 7; Schedule 2 §2.5, PDF 13. It does not show retention complied with in an actual case. |\n| Legal advisers: surveillance boundary | The draft says DSIT has no directed-surveillance RIPA authorization; activity risking that threshold must not be authorized and uncertainty goes to legal advisers. | Schedule 2 Part B §§1.5–1.6, PDF 15. This is the draft's legal/operational account, not an independent determination about each collection. |\n\nThe data-collection checklist, Schedule 3, PDF 16–19, is almost entirely redacted. PDF 7 also visibly blacks out portions of escalation and review procedure. These are real redactions, confirmed visually at PDF 7 and 16, not merely failed text extraction. The draft says a DPIA has been completed and is regularly reviewed (Schedule 2 Part A §2.2(d), PDF 11); the actual DPIA and its conclusions were not acquired. No attempt was made to recover redacted text.\n\n## What current public accounts corroborate\n\nIn **HL3811, answered 30 April 2024**, the government says DSIT has platform trusted-flagger status and may refer material within ministerial steers/remit that appears to violate platform terms; platforms decide the outcome. This establishes the department's publicly described referral channel, without proving a DSA statutory designation. Answer (see source references)\n\n**HL7610, answered 3 June 2025**, identifies foreign-state threats, election risks and AI/deepfakes among the team's subjects, with ministers agreeing high-risk work. **9335, answered 22 June 2026**, restates the public-safety/national-security remit and continuing ministerial review. Neither answer publishes a commissioned topic list, the exact search terms or referral threshold scores. 2025 answer (see source references) 2026 answer (see source references)\n\nThe current official privacy notice names DSIT as controller. It describes aggregate analysis of public information, incidental personal/special-category data, minimisation, no private-page review and no automated decision-making/profiling. It describes platform referrals, public-interest processing bases, retention limits and DPO/ICO complaint routes. It now names **The Global Strategy Network Limited** as an appointed analysis contractor. This is not an exclusive-provider statement, proof Crisp was replaced, or a specification for the February 2025 payment. The page displays publication on16 April 2024, but a revision date for this contractor paragraph was not established. Do not backdate the current wording. Notice, controller, purpose, sharing, retention and rights sections (see source references)\n\nThe distinction between public trend analysis and processing individual posts must stay visible: the policy's stated restrictions do not mean personal data is never processed. Equally, the existence of handles, links or political opinions in collected public content does not alone prove an individualized surveillance programme.\n\n## Actual supplier output and disclosure review\n\n**ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4, 11 November 2025**, confirms a request for Crisp reports within the week beginning 24 June 2024. DSIT said all but one had been deleted under retention policy; on 24 October 2025 it partially disclosed the remaining report and released a June referral count of ten (§§8–14, PDF 2–3). The ICO inspected the unredacted report (§18). DSIT described keyword tracking, behavioural analytics, platform strategies and threat-identification criteria (§36, PDF 11–14). Those are attributed submissions, not methods personally inspected here. The Commissioner upheld the remaining national-security redactions after considering public interest (§§39–43, PDF 15), with tribunal appeal available (§44, PDF 16). This is independent review of disclosure, not certification of NSOIT's operating legality. The underlying report, its exact date and any invoice linkage remain unread. Paragraph 36 calls it the week of the general election; that wording must not silently replace the request's week beginning 24 June 2024. Original decision (see source references)\n\n## Referral, lawful speech and the limits of oversight\n\nThe **14 April 2026 parliamentary hearing**, Q25–30, PDF 8–11, supplies an unusually explicit operating account. Minister Kanishka Narayan described a public-safety/national-security threshold, declined the requested activity/removal figures, and offered future briefings subject to security constraints. At Q29, Talitha Rowland described Southport-era monitoring of lawful but harmful narratives, early warnings even before content appeared on a platform, and requests for review against each platform's own terms. She distinguished that work from law enforcement's illegal-content response. At Q30 she said they lacked specific foreign-interference indicators at the time; do not recast this example as proven foreign-state content. This supports a government-to-platform influence channel affecting lawful material, while platforms retain the described action decision. It does not demonstrate a removal order, Crisp's role in that example, or the resulting removal rate. Hearing, Q25–30 (see source references)\n\nThe Science, Innovation and Technology Committee's **July 2025 report**, §§60–62, recommended statutory footing and Intelligence and Security Committee oversight. Its October government response, received 18 September and published 17 October 2025, instead defended ministerial oversight, existing parliamentary questioning, FOI and subject-access routes; it did not commit to the requested statutory/ISC reform. A general commitment to accountability is therefore not acceptance of that institutional safeguard. Committee §62 (see source references) response, Appendix 1, Disinformation Campaigns, reply to §62 (see source references)\n\nThis is not an absence-of-all-review finding: MPs questioned ministers, the ICO examined withheld material, and stated data-rights routes exist. The missing layer is a published independent operational audit and the actual task/approval records needed to test compliance. Nor does the government's statement that platforms decide action settle the separate question of how official flagging, privileged access and regulatory relationships influence those decisions.\n\n## Candidate relations and the discriminating gap\n\n| Candidate ID | Typed relation | Evidence stage |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| commission-e-ministers | DSIT ministers → NSOIT: set/review remit | Public ministerial account, 2025 and 2026. |\n| commission-e-tasking | NSOIT / Cabinet Office NSS → collection activity: proposed tasking route | Acquired disclosed draft §3.2; no actual order. |\n| commission-e-partner-instructions | DSIT/NSOIT → delivery partners: documented instruction/method agreement | Draft §§3.5–3.6; applicability to paid Crisp engagement unestablished. |\n| commission-e-crisp-report | Crisp → NSOIT: produced report | Independent disclosure adjudication; report itself unread. |\n| commission-e-platform-referral | NSOIT → platforms: flags or warns for terms review | Departmental accounts, 2024 and 2026; voluntary action described. |\n| commission-e-ico-review | ICO → DSIT disclosure decision: upheld remaining redactions | 11 November 2025; not an operational audit. |\n| commission-e-oversight-request | Committee → government: requests statutory/ISC oversight | July 2025 recommendation; response offers existing channels without commitment to requested reform. |\n| commission-e-current-contractor | NSOIT → Global Strategy Network Ltd: reports appointment for analysis | Current notice; appointment date and exact contract unestablished. |\n\nThe strongest rival to a private supplier choosing what citizens may say is an instructed contractor performing bounded public-source analysis, with government retaining tasking/referral responsibility and platforms retaining action. The strongest concern supported by these records is more specific: a government-selected monitoring and privileged referral process can reach lawful material, while precise criteria and authorization steps are not fully visible and a proposed stronger oversight structure was not adopted in the inspected response.\n\nThe next discriminating record is the executed SOW/data-processing schedule/tasking instruction and completed assessment matching transaction 654609, followed by the escalation log and platform response for a specified case. A published final compliance policy, its adoption/version history, the DPIA and an independent assurance report would test whether the draft's constraints actually governed delivery. Likely holders are DSIT Commercial, NSOIT, the Operational Data/DPO team and the actual supplier. These are precise public-record gaps, not a claim that the records do not exist. No outreach was undertaken. Acquisition stops here for forest review.\n\n## Source custody and access limits\n\nThe original payment remains in the prior wave. This wave retained the following bytes; .txt files are extraction derivatives, not originals. The capture manifest is commission-captures.json.\n\n| Source/file | Capture and SHA-256 | Reading scope / state |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| commission-ico-decision.pdf | 2026-09-09T09:01:46Z; 172637 bytes;1e33d2fcaa65f09cb4d045b04f85689e65db3779604fdcaa2e175477acd3ae56 | Full 16-page original text read, scoped findings above. |\n| commission-privacy.html | 2026-09-09T09:01:46Z; 96332 bytes;5891f9aa42d6c159d0c1a8b34ad286bbe536a53d93c94dcada1f3c46d3f5690c | Complete substantive current notice read through official reader; original HTML retained. |\n| commission-compliance-redacted.pdf | 2026-09-09T09:03:33Z; 264507 bytes;af10011b6bab2a29cc2c59225b9100aa37a9a9df3e14176dea5abcfbe8b26a79 | Full 19-page available text read; PDF 7 and 16 visually inspected. Public FOI-associated custodian copy; marked draft; no underlying DSIT file comparison. |\n| 2026 oral hearing | Exact parliamentary URL above; reader turn985view2 / turn987view1–4 | Q25–30 plus institutional context Q7 read. Ordinary GET 403; no original retained and no retry. |\n| 2025 committee report / response | Exact URLs above; report §§60–62; response metadata and relevant reply | Primary reader text read; response ordinary GET 403. No original retained, no retry. |\n| Parliamentary answers | HL3811, HL7610, 9335 exact URLs above | Complete question and answer text read through official reader. |\n\nThe BBW PDF reader initially returned a one-line 'One moment, please...' page. One ordinary GET substitute succeeded with an actual PDF; no challenge solving or access-control evasion occurred. The prior Contracts Finder 403, ACNC restriction and other closed routes were not retried. Searches also surfaced unrelated MOD 'New Style of IT' records; these were excluded because the acronym denotes a different programme. Additional spending months were not opened or totalled. No WEF taxonomy specification, supplier-controlled censorship right or February 2025 invoice match was found in the inspected material.\n",
        "file": "research/implementation-instructions-wave-2026-09-09-uk-commissioning.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant",
        "title": "Crisp, Resolver and the commercial implementation layer",
        "description": "Bounded public-record investigation, 9 September 2026, following the taxonomy forest review. This packet separates legal control, brand integration, advertised services and an actual departmental spending entry. It does not establish that WEF participation produced a contract or that any regulator requires a Resolver product.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded public-record investigation, 9 September 2026, following the taxonomy forest review. This packet separates legal control, brand integration, advertised services and an actual departmental spending entry. It does not establish that WEF participation produced a contract or that any regulator requires a Resolver product.</p>\n<p>The decisive addition is a primary DSIT record of <strong>GBP 56,736 paid to Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd on 5 February 2025</strong>, transaction 654609, within Security and Online Harms. This supplies a concrete government-to-supplier financial relation. It does not disclose the invoice, deliverables, classification rules or contract that generated that payment. Crisp&#x27;s contribution to the 2023 typology, its later Resolver branding, and the 2025 payment must remain separate dated relations. [Official February dataset](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-entities-rights-and-dates\">Legal entities, rights and dates</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Date / entity</th>\n<th>What the primary record establishes</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Crisp Thinking Group Limited, 05636614</td>\n<td>The current Crisp privacy policy names this company, trading as Crisp. Companies House identifies the same numbered company.</td>\n<td>A current privacy-policy controller is not automatically the signatory of every historic sales contract. [Policy](http[local research file] [register](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited, 06442193</td>\n<td>Companies House records Crisp Thinking Group Ltd, 05636614, as the active corporate person with significant control, notified 6 April 2016, with <strong>75% or more of shares</strong>.</td>\n<td>The displayed record does not establish an exact 100% holding or separately display voting-control rights. [UK company PSC record](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Crisp Thinking (US) Inc.</td>\n<td>The current Crisp policy identifies it as another group company, alongside Group Limited and UK Limited.</td>\n<td>US registration identifier, jurisdiction and equity chain were not independently established.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30 March 2022: Kroll / Resolver</td>\n<td>Kroll announces that it acquired Resolver; the subsequent Crisp announcement expressly calls the earlier target Resolver Inc.</td>\n<td>These are acquisition announcements, not share-purchase instruments. Price, exact buyer entity and acquired percentage are not disclosed in the inspected text. [Resolver acquisition announcement](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>25 May 2022: Crisp Group control</td>\n<td>The register records <strong>Kroll International (UK) Limited, 09897805</strong>, notified on this date, with <strong>75% or more of shares and voting rights</strong>.</td>\n<td>Registered notification date is distinct from the later public announcement. [Group PSC record](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>31 May 2022: Kroll / Crisp announcement</td>\n<td>Kroll announces acquisition of Crisp and an intended combination of its real-time risk intelligence with the previously acquired Resolver software. Hildreth and Andrew Burke were to join Kroll&#x27;s digital-services leadership.</td>\n<td>This identifies an announced integration mechanism, not a transaction value or a mandate to public bodies. [Crisp acquisition announcement](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>29 December 2022: Crisp Group control changes</td>\n<td>Kroll International (UK) Limited is recorded as ceasing control; <strong>Kroll Advisory Ltd., 05568550</strong>, is the active recorded controller, notified that day, with <strong>75% or more of shares and voting rights</strong>.</td>\n<td>This is the directly evidenced intermediate control chain. It does not establish ultimate ownership, exact percentages, consideration or the legal mechanism of the transfer.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>19/20 March 2024: brand alignment</td>\n<td>Resolver&#x27;s page is posted 19 March, while its body dateline is Toronto, 20 March. It says Crisp will operate under the Resolver banner and describes unification of brands, including Platform Trust &amp; Safety and Brand Equity Protection.</td>\n<td>Preserve both displayed dates. This is not evidence of a new 2024 share acquisition. [Brand announcement](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Resolver Inc.: currently served contract form</td>\n<td>Resolver&#x27;s terms identify Resolver Inc. and applicable affiliates; the customer is identified on an Order Form. The served version is 3.0, dated 20 August 2021.</td>\n<td>An unsigned standard form does not resolve the party to a particular Crisp or government engagement. Its Toronto notice address alone does not establish incorporation jurisdiction. [Terms, preamble and §§1, 5, 17](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Companies House expressly cautions that it does not check the accuracy of filed information. The control findings above are what its public record reports, rather than a beneficial-ownership audit. Do not replace the exact entities with an undifferentiated Kroll parent or treat the 2026 footer as evidence that Resolver Inc. authored or contracted for the 2023 workstream.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-sold-and-who-sets-operational-instructions\">What is sold, and who sets operational instructions</h2>\n<p>Crisp&#x27;s current policy describes collecting and indexing publicly available material for harm detection, channel moderation and crisis detection. It distinguishes acting as a processor on customer-owned channels from acting as a controller for its crisis-detection search/index. It describes algorithms and human experts, customer-specified automatic removal, escalation of more consequential cases, and ways to challenge decisions. These are the supplier&#x27;s published descriptions, not an independent audit of deployment, data access or lawfulness. The policy supplies a concrete route from classification to operational action, but does not identify a WEF definition as binding on its customers. No policy revision date was established; its current text is not backdated to 2023. [Crisp policy, Our Services and automated-decision paragraphs](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The Resolver form explains how a specific purchase would become accountable: an Order Form and, where used, a Statement of Work specify services, responsibilities, deliverables and payment terms; written agreement governs changes. The missing executed order, SOW and processing instructions would therefore discriminate between general capability and the actual system a customer bought. [Resolver terms, §§1 and 5](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A separate <strong>18 March 2026</strong> announcement documents a collaboration between Resolver Trust &amp; Safety and <strong>Illuminate Tech</strong>. Illuminate supplies <strong>OSCAR</strong>, a tool for translating online-safety requirements into compliance workflows; Resolver supplies harm assessment, intelligence, assurance and remediation expertise. The named market includes platforms facing UK OSA and EU DSA enforcement. The statement says joint industry engagement had begun. It describes Illuminate as founded by former Ofcom experts, but supplies neither an official endorsement nor a named purchaser, compulsory tool, contract value or WEF-related procurement decision. This is direct evidence of a commercial compliance offering and a supplier-reported collaboration. It is not an award. [Announcement, opening through joint-engagement paragraph](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-departmental-payment-and-a-separate-unverified-award-lead\">A departmental payment, and a separate unverified award lead</h2>\n<p>The original February 2025 CSV contains one matching row in this file: <strong>data row 94</strong>, transaction <strong>654609</strong>, payment date <strong>05/02/2025</strong>, supplier <strong>Crisp Thinking (Uk) Ltd</strong>, amount <strong>56736</strong>, supplier type <strong>Vendor</strong>. Expense type is Other Professional Services; expense area is DSIT&#x27;s Digital and Technology Group / Security and Online Harms. The description assigns it to the Security Team NSOIT &amp; Tech Programme. The supplier name matches the separately registered UK company, but this dataset supplies no company number. Record that cross-source identity matching rather than pretending the CSV itself contains 06442193.</p>\n<p>The amount is <strong>GBP 56,736, published departmental payment, dated 5 February 2025</strong>. It is neither total contract value nor verified net revenue; VAT treatment, invoice period and exact purchased outputs are unestablished. No join to a particular 2023 award, WEF workstream, Australian duty or OSCAR deployment is supported. The collection was first published 29 January 2026 and last updated 30 July 2026; those publication dates are distinct from payment date. The update history says July added later months and does not establish a revision to this specific row. [Original CSV](http[local research file] [publisher and update history](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A separate secondary listing discovers an award called <strong>Mis/Disinformation Monitoring and Analysis</strong>, reference 103528, supplier abbreviated Crisp Thinking, award publication 27 September 2023, delivery 24 August 2023–31 March 2024, listed value GBP 350,960. It describes DCMS handling the notice for DSIT. These remain <strong>secondary-reported lead fields</strong>, not a primary-verified award or money paid. The actual notice is [Contracts Finder 47f6e657-8370-4133-98df-ee2f2194144e](http[local research file] its web reader failed and the one ordinary GET substitute returned HTTP 403. The route is closed. [Discovery listing](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A DCMS FOI response, dated 3 October 2025 and published 7 October, refused a broad request naming Crisp and many other suppliers under the cost limit. The request&#x27;s list is not evidence of agreements held with every named company, and the refusal does not prove no agreement exists. It is excluded from positive procurement findings. [FOI2025/08916](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-join-test-and-candidate-relations\">The join test and candidate relations</h2>\n<p>The previous packet establishes Hildreth&#x27;s Crisp affiliation and workstream co-chair role through the participant&#x27;s 24 August 2023 account. This packet establishes a control chain, a later brand change, advertised compliance services and an independently published departmental payment. Those relations can coexist without a causal procurement edge. [Dated typology account, opening](http[local research file] see the prior taxonomy-producers.md for its full reading scope.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate ID</th>\n<th>Direction / type</th>\n<th>Stage and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-group-uk</td>\n<td>Crisp Thinking Group Limited → Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited: recorded share control, ≥75%</td>\n<td>Registry report, notified 6 April 2016; exact percentage unknown.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-kroll-international</td>\n<td>Kroll International (UK) Limited → Crisp Thinking Group Limited: recorded shares/votes ≥75%</td>\n<td>Notified 25 May 2022; ceased 29 December 2022.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-kroll-advisory</td>\n<td>Kroll Advisory Ltd. → Crisp Thinking Group Limited: recorded shares/votes ≥75%</td>\n<td>Notified 29 December 2022; active in inspected register.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-resolver-acquisition</td>\n<td>Kroll → Resolver: announced acquisition</td>\n<td>30 March 2022; buyer legal entity and consideration not resolved.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-crisp-acquisition</td>\n<td>Kroll → Crisp: announced acquisition and integration</td>\n<td>31 May 2022; use the separate registry edges for exact entities and rights.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-brand</td>\n<td>Crisp → Resolver: announced brand alignment</td>\n<td>Posted 19 March / datelined 20 March 2024; not a new share-purchase claim.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-dsit-payment</td>\n<td>DSIT → Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd: published supplier payment</td>\n<td>Amount object: currency GBP; value 56736; kind departmental payment; date 2025-02-05; VAT treatment unknown; transaction 654609. Identity matched by supplier name to register.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-illuminate</td>\n<td>Resolver Trust &amp; Safety ↔ Illuminate Tech: announced compliance-service collaboration</td>\n<td>18 March 2026 participant statement; OSCAR creator is Illuminate; no procurement or regulatory approval edge.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-e-service</td>\n<td>Crisp → customers: describes harm-monitoring/moderation services</td>\n<td>Current published policy and customer instructions; actual customer configuration not observed.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The strongest rival to a workstream-to-revenue causal account is an existing commercial provider contributing expertise to a voluntary taxonomy while independently selling services and later entering a government payment relationship. Its commercial interest is real and relevant. The acquired entities and payment make that interest more concrete, but a roster, chronology and payment cannot determine why a buyer selected it or which taxonomy governed the work.</p>\n<p>The decisive missing records are an executed DSIT contract/SOW and invoice matching transaction 654609, supplier-selection or evaluation records, and any deliverable or contractual classification specification that expressly adopts the WEF typology. Likely holders are DSIT&#x27;s finance/commercial and Security and Online Harms teams and the relevant Crisp contracting company. A public contract, invoice disclosure, evaluation report or published operating specification would reopen that test. No outreach is authorized or performed. The secondary 2023 notice is a locator for a future genuinely accessible primary record, not permission to retry a closed route.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-scope-and-custody\">Source scope and custody</h2>\n<p>Access date: 9 September 2026. Only the DSIT HTML and CSV original bytes were retained in this lane. Other listed sources were read through the primary web reader, not downloaded; no original hash is claimed for them. The prior WEF original-PDF and ACNC restrictions remain closed.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source alias</th>\n<th>Exact locator / reading scope</th>\n<th>State</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-crisp-policy</td>\n<td>http[local research file] — identity paragraphs and complete Services section; reader turn951view1 lines 10–14, 104–151</td>\n<td>Read current primary policy; undated revision.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-psc-group</td>\n<td>http[local research file] — Kroll corporate entries, reader turn960view0 lines 27–81</td>\n<td>Read register; original filed PSC forms not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-psc-uk</td>\n<td>http[local research file] — current corporate entry, turn960view1 lines 26–51</td>\n<td>Read register; no exact 100% inference.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-acquire-resolver</td>\n<td>Kroll Resolver acquisition URL above; dated body, turn963view2 lines 6–18</td>\n<td>Read company announcement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-acquire-crisp</td>\n<td>Kroll Crisp acquisition URL above; dated substantive body, turn954view0</td>\n<td>Read company announcement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-brand</td>\n<td>Resolver brand announcement URL above; turn963view3 lines 5–19</td>\n<td>Read company announcement; two displayed dates preserved.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-terms</td>\n<td>Resolver terms URL above; preamble, §§1, 5, 15, 17; turn953view1/turn956view3</td>\n<td>Read standard form, version 3.0 dated 20 August 2021; no executed agreement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-illuminate</td>\n<td>Resolver partnership URL above; turn963view1 lines 5–33</td>\n<td>Read complete substantive announcement; no customer list audited.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-dsit</td>\n<td>Official CSV/preview URLs above; header and complete matching row; preview turn961view0 line 62 and turn962view2 line 157; CSV data row 94</td>\n<td>Read original CSV selected row; full bytes retained, other rows not substantively audited.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-dsit-publisher</td>\n<td>DSIT 2025 spending collection above; turn963view0 lines 53–64, 146–187</td>\n<td>Read title, publication/update metadata and explanation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-award-lead</td>\n<td>Contracts Finder notice above, discovered through Bidstats listing</td>\n<td>Primary inaccessible; web reader Internal Error, ordinary requests GET HTTPError 403. No original retained and no retry.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-s-foi</td>\n<td>FOI2025/08916 above, request and response</td>\n<td>Read primary release; excluded as evidence of any specific contract held.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Original captures at 2026-09-09T08:56:13Z (start of capture operation):</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Local file</th>\n<th>Bytes</th>\n<th>SHA-256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-dsit-feb2025-preview.html</td>\n<td>186361</td>\n<td>f6d1e7955190b7099d6968efc0dd41a272e2c51eb15a259fe464b173e2033d53</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>commercial-dsit-feb2025.csv</td>\n<td>43426</td>\n<td>ee37e522067dcb3304a3e77857f5cb37f5c7d960b7898128a4b245d795f83391</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The reader&#x27;s Download CSV click returned Internal Error; the one ordinary publisher-HTML retrieval succeeded, exposed the actual download link, and the linked original CSV succeeded. This was an independent DSIT spending publication, not a substitute route around Contracts Finder&#x27;s 403. No later month, historical funder roster or unrelated client hunt was opened after this substantive breakpoint. Return to whole-case forest assessment before another acquisition run.</p>",
        "path": "implementation-wave-2026-09-09/commercial-participant.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-policy",
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-group-psc",
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-uk-psc",
          "w15-impl-s-crisp-acquisition",
          "w15-impl-s-resolver-brand",
          "w15-impl-s-resolver-terms",
          "w15-impl-s-illuminate",
          "w15-impl-s-dsit-payment",
          "w15-impl-s-dsit-publisher",
          "w15-impl-s-award-unavailable",
          "w15-impl-s-award-discovery"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded public-record investigation, 9 September 2026, following the taxonomy forest review. This packet separates legal control, brand integration, advertised services and an actual departmental spending entry. It does not establish that WEF participation produced a contract or that any regulator requires a Resolver product.\n\nThe decisive addition is a primary DSIT record of **GBP 56,736 paid to Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd on 5 February 2025**, transaction 654609, within Security and Online Harms. This supplies a concrete government-to-supplier financial relation. It does not disclose the invoice, deliverables, classification rules or contract that generated that payment. Crisp's contribution to the 2023 typology, its later Resolver branding, and the 2025 payment must remain separate dated relations. Official February dataset (see source references)\n\n## Legal entities, rights and dates\n\n| Date / entity | What the primary record establishes | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Crisp Thinking Group Limited, 05636614 | The current Crisp privacy policy names this company, trading as Crisp. Companies House identifies the same numbered company. | A current privacy-policy controller is not automatically the signatory of every historic sales contract. Policy (see source references) register (see source references) |\n| Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited, 06442193 | Companies House records Crisp Thinking Group Ltd, 05636614, as the active corporate person with significant control, notified 6 April 2016, with **75% or more of shares**. | The displayed record does not establish an exact 100% holding or separately display voting-control rights. UK company PSC record (see source references) |\n| Crisp Thinking (US) Inc. | The current Crisp policy identifies it as another group company, alongside Group Limited and UK Limited. | US registration identifier, jurisdiction and equity chain were not independently established. |\n| 30 March 2022: Kroll / Resolver | Kroll announces that it acquired Resolver; the subsequent Crisp announcement expressly calls the earlier target Resolver Inc. | These are acquisition announcements, not share-purchase instruments. Price, exact buyer entity and acquired percentage are not disclosed in the inspected text. Resolver acquisition announcement (see source references) |\n| 25 May 2022: Crisp Group control | The register records **Kroll International (UK) Limited, 09897805**, notified on this date, with **75% or more of shares and voting rights**. | Registered notification date is distinct from the later public announcement. Group PSC record (see source references) |\n| 31 May 2022: Kroll / Crisp announcement | Kroll announces acquisition of Crisp and an intended combination of its real-time risk intelligence with the previously acquired Resolver software. Hildreth and Andrew Burke were to join Kroll's digital-services leadership. | This identifies an announced integration mechanism, not a transaction value or a mandate to public bodies. Crisp acquisition announcement (see source references) |\n| 29 December 2022: Crisp Group control changes | Kroll International (UK) Limited is recorded as ceasing control; **Kroll Advisory Ltd., 05568550**, is the active recorded controller, notified that day, with **75% or more of shares and voting rights**. | This is the directly evidenced intermediate control chain. It does not establish ultimate ownership, exact percentages, consideration or the legal mechanism of the transfer. |\n| 19/20 March 2024: brand alignment | Resolver's page is posted 19 March, while its body dateline is Toronto, 20 March. It says Crisp will operate under the Resolver banner and describes unification of brands, including Platform Trust & Safety and Brand Equity Protection. | Preserve both displayed dates. This is not evidence of a new 2024 share acquisition. Brand announcement (see source references) |\n| Resolver Inc.: currently served contract form | Resolver's terms identify Resolver Inc. and applicable affiliates; the customer is identified on an Order Form. The served version is 3.0, dated 20 August 2021. | An unsigned standard form does not resolve the party to a particular Crisp or government engagement. Its Toronto notice address alone does not establish incorporation jurisdiction. Terms, preamble and §§1, 5, 17 (see source references) |\n\nCompanies House expressly cautions that it does not check the accuracy of filed information. The control findings above are what its public record reports, rather than a beneficial-ownership audit. Do not replace the exact entities with an undifferentiated Kroll parent or treat the 2026 footer as evidence that Resolver Inc. authored or contracted for the 2023 workstream.\n\n## What is sold, and who sets operational instructions\n\nCrisp's current policy describes collecting and indexing publicly available material for harm detection, channel moderation and crisis detection. It distinguishes acting as a processor on customer-owned channels from acting as a controller for its crisis-detection search/index. It describes algorithms and human experts, customer-specified automatic removal, escalation of more consequential cases, and ways to challenge decisions. These are the supplier's published descriptions, not an independent audit of deployment, data access or lawfulness. The policy supplies a concrete route from classification to operational action, but does not identify a WEF definition as binding on its customers. No policy revision date was established; its current text is not backdated to 2023. Crisp policy, Our Services and automated-decision paragraphs (see source references)\n\nThe Resolver form explains how a specific purchase would become accountable: an Order Form and, where used, a Statement of Work specify services, responsibilities, deliverables and payment terms; written agreement governs changes. The missing executed order, SOW and processing instructions would therefore discriminate between general capability and the actual system a customer bought. Resolver terms, §§1 and 5 (see source references)\n\nA separate **18 March 2026** announcement documents a collaboration between Resolver Trust & Safety and **Illuminate Tech**. Illuminate supplies **OSCAR**, a tool for translating online-safety requirements into compliance workflows; Resolver supplies harm assessment, intelligence, assurance and remediation expertise. The named market includes platforms facing UK OSA and EU DSA enforcement. The statement says joint industry engagement had begun. It describes Illuminate as founded by former Ofcom experts, but supplies neither an official endorsement nor a named purchaser, compulsory tool, contract value or WEF-related procurement decision. This is direct evidence of a commercial compliance offering and a supplier-reported collaboration. It is not an award. Announcement, opening through joint-engagement paragraph (see source references)\n\n## A departmental payment, and a separate unverified award lead\n\nThe original February 2025 CSV contains one matching row in this file: **data row 94**, transaction **654609**, payment date **05/02/2025**, supplier **Crisp Thinking (Uk) Ltd**, amount **56736**, supplier type **Vendor**. Expense type is Other Professional Services; expense area is DSIT's Digital and Technology Group / Security and Online Harms. The description assigns it to the Security Team NSOIT & Tech Programme. The supplier name matches the separately registered UK company, but this dataset supplies no company number. Record that cross-source identity matching rather than pretending the CSV itself contains 06442193.\n\nThe amount is **GBP 56,736, published departmental payment, dated 5 February 2025**. It is neither total contract value nor verified net revenue; VAT treatment, invoice period and exact purchased outputs are unestablished. No join to a particular 2023 award, WEF workstream, Australian duty or OSCAR deployment is supported. The collection was first published 29 January 2026 and last updated 30 July 2026; those publication dates are distinct from payment date. The update history says July added later months and does not establish a revision to this specific row. Original CSV (see source references) publisher and update history (see source references)\n\nA separate secondary listing discovers an award called **Mis/Disinformation Monitoring and Analysis**, reference 103528, supplier abbreviated Crisp Thinking, award publication 27 September 2023, delivery 24 August 2023–31 March 2024, listed value GBP 350,960. It describes DCMS handling the notice for DSIT. These remain **secondary-reported lead fields**, not a primary-verified award or money paid. The actual notice is Contracts Finder 47f6e657-8370-4133-98df-ee2f2194144e (see source references) its web reader failed and the one ordinary GET substitute returned HTTP 403. The route is closed. Discovery listing (see source references)\n\nA DCMS FOI response, dated 3 October 2025 and published 7 October, refused a broad request naming Crisp and many other suppliers under the cost limit. The request's list is not evidence of agreements held with every named company, and the refusal does not prove no agreement exists. It is excluded from positive procurement findings. FOI2025/08916 (see source references)\n\n## The join test and candidate relations\n\nThe previous packet establishes Hildreth's Crisp affiliation and workstream co-chair role through the participant's 24 August 2023 account. This packet establishes a control chain, a later brand change, advertised compliance services and an independently published departmental payment. Those relations can coexist without a causal procurement edge. Dated typology account, opening (see source references) see the prior taxonomy-producers.md for its full reading scope.\n\n| Candidate ID | Direction / type | Stage and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| commercial-e-group-uk | Crisp Thinking Group Limited → Crisp Thinking (UK) Limited: recorded share control, ≥75% | Registry report, notified 6 April 2016; exact percentage unknown. |\n| commercial-e-kroll-international | Kroll International (UK) Limited → Crisp Thinking Group Limited: recorded shares/votes ≥75% | Notified 25 May 2022; ceased 29 December 2022. |\n| commercial-e-kroll-advisory | Kroll Advisory Ltd. → Crisp Thinking Group Limited: recorded shares/votes ≥75% | Notified 29 December 2022; active in inspected register. |\n| commercial-e-resolver-acquisition | Kroll → Resolver: announced acquisition | 30 March 2022; buyer legal entity and consideration not resolved. |\n| commercial-e-crisp-acquisition | Kroll → Crisp: announced acquisition and integration | 31 May 2022; use the separate registry edges for exact entities and rights. |\n| commercial-e-brand | Crisp → Resolver: announced brand alignment | Posted 19 March / datelined 20 March 2024; not a new share-purchase claim. |\n| commercial-e-dsit-payment | DSIT → Crisp Thinking (UK) Ltd: published supplier payment | Amount object: currency GBP; value 56736; kind departmental payment; date 2025-02-05; VAT treatment unknown; transaction 654609. Identity matched by supplier name to register. |\n| commercial-e-illuminate | Resolver Trust & Safety ↔ Illuminate Tech: announced compliance-service collaboration | 18 March 2026 participant statement; OSCAR creator is Illuminate; no procurement or regulatory approval edge. |\n| commercial-e-service | Crisp → customers: describes harm-monitoring/moderation services | Current published policy and customer instructions; actual customer configuration not observed. |\n\nThe strongest rival to a workstream-to-revenue causal account is an existing commercial provider contributing expertise to a voluntary taxonomy while independently selling services and later entering a government payment relationship. Its commercial interest is real and relevant. The acquired entities and payment make that interest more concrete, but a roster, chronology and payment cannot determine why a buyer selected it or which taxonomy governed the work.\n\nThe decisive missing records are an executed DSIT contract/SOW and invoice matching transaction 654609, supplier-selection or evaluation records, and any deliverable or contractual classification specification that expressly adopts the WEF typology. Likely holders are DSIT's finance/commercial and Security and Online Harms teams and the relevant Crisp contracting company. A public contract, invoice disclosure, evaluation report or published operating specification would reopen that test. No outreach is authorized or performed. The secondary 2023 notice is a locator for a future genuinely accessible primary record, not permission to retry a closed route.\n\n## Source scope and custody\n\nAccess date: 9 September 2026. Only the DSIT HTML and CSV original bytes were retained in this lane. Other listed sources were read through the primary web reader, not downloaded; no original hash is claimed for them. The prior WEF original-PDF and ACNC restrictions remain closed.\n\n| Source alias | Exact locator / reading scope | State |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| commercial-s-crisp-policy | http[local research file] — identity paragraphs and complete Services section; reader turn951view1 lines 10–14, 104–151 | Read current primary policy; undated revision. |\n| commercial-s-psc-group | http[local research file] — Kroll corporate entries, reader turn960view0 lines 27–81 | Read register; original filed PSC forms not read. |\n| commercial-s-psc-uk | http[local research file] — current corporate entry, turn960view1 lines 26–51 | Read register; no exact 100% inference. |\n| commercial-s-acquire-resolver | Kroll Resolver acquisition URL above; dated body, turn963view2 lines 6–18 | Read company announcement. |\n| commercial-s-acquire-crisp | Kroll Crisp acquisition URL above; dated substantive body, turn954view0 | Read company announcement. |\n| commercial-s-brand | Resolver brand announcement URL above; turn963view3 lines 5–19 | Read company announcement; two displayed dates preserved. |\n| commercial-s-terms | Resolver terms URL above; preamble, §§1, 5, 15, 17; turn953view1/turn956view3 | Read standard form, version 3.0 dated 20 August 2021; no executed agreement. |\n| commercial-s-illuminate | Resolver partnership URL above; turn963view1 lines 5–33 | Read complete substantive announcement; no customer list audited. |\n| commercial-s-dsit | Official CSV/preview URLs above; header and complete matching row; preview turn961view0 line 62 and turn962view2 line 157; CSV data row 94 | Read original CSV selected row; full bytes retained, other rows not substantively audited. |\n| commercial-s-dsit-publisher | DSIT 2025 spending collection above; turn963view0 lines 53–64, 146–187 | Read title, publication/update metadata and explanation. |\n| commercial-s-award-lead | Contracts Finder notice above, discovered through Bidstats listing | Primary inaccessible; web reader Internal Error, ordinary requests GET HTTPError 403. No original retained and no retry. |\n| commercial-s-foi | FOI2025/08916 above, request and response | Read primary release; excluded as evidence of any specific contract held. |\n\nOriginal captures at 2026-09-09T08:56:13Z (start of capture operation):\n\n| Local file | Bytes | SHA-256 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| commercial-dsit-feb2025-preview.html | 186361 | f6d1e7955190b7099d6968efc0dd41a272e2c51eb15a259fe464b173e2033d53 |\n| commercial-dsit-feb2025.csv | 43426 | ee37e522067dcb3304a3e77857f5cb37f5c7d960b7898128a4b245d795f83391 |\n\nThe reader's Download CSV click returned Internal Error; the one ordinary publisher-HTML retrieval succeeded, exposed the actual download link, and the linked original CSV succeeded. This was an independent DSIT spending publication, not a substitute route around Contracts Finder's 403. No later month, historical funder roster or unrelated client hunt was opened after this substantive breakpoint. Return to whole-case forest assessment before another acquisition run.\n",
        "file": "research/implementation-wave-2026-09-09-commercial-participant.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules",
        "title": "UK KYBC: government consideration, narrower advertising proposals, and a 2026 industry pathway",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. No canonical case, reader or ZIP changed. This is a source-scoped policy comparison, not a legal opinion or an exhaustive current UK statute search.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. No canonical case, reader or ZIP changed. This is a source-scoped policy comparison, not a legal opinion or an exhaustive current UK statute search.</p>\n<p>The acquired government record establishes that KYBC reached the policy agenda and cross-departmental discussion. It does not establish adoption of the IP groups&#x27; broader proposal requiring underlying commercial infrastructure providers to verify all business customers and stop serving those they cannot verify. A related but narrower advertiser-verification proposal appears in the 2023 Online Advertising Programme response. Separately, the March 2026 Fraud Strategy describes a current government/IAB UK partnership with an early-2027 report-back and conditional legislation, alongside a distinct statutory fraudulent-advertising regime whose commencement was then expected in 2027. Do not merge these into one enacted KYBC instrument or attribute the advertising pathway to Alliance without a transmission record.</p>\n<h2 id=\"1-explicit-government-acknowledgment-september-2021\">1. Explicit government acknowledgment: September 2021</h2>\n<p>Source: House of Commons DCMS Committee, HC719, Economics of music streaming: Government and Competition and Markets Authority Responses, response received 15 September and published 22 September 2021. [Official document](http[local research file] Read title/introduction and recommendation23 with its complete government response, PDF10-11 / printed8-9, readerlines364-415.</p>\n<p>Recommendation23 asks government to address recording-industry concerns about enforcement of existing KYBC obligations. The appended GOVERNMENT response says KYBC for IP enforcement warrants further attention and the upcoming infringement strategy will consider it; IPO plans work with other departments on possible improvements. This is an identifiable government response to a committee recommendation, rather than an inference from shared vocabulary. It does not name a new verifier, required identification method, service-suspension trigger, sanction or appeal. Its surrounding discussion of licensing, EU Article17 and private civil action must not be treated as adoption of the broader KYBC proposal.</p>\n<p>Custody: ordinary original GET returned403 and is closed. Error bytes retained separately; their hash does not authenticate the report. The successful official webreader is the credible substitute, retained as disposition-music2021.reader.txt. The cover/date was separately read through that reader, not recovered as original PDF bytes. See manifest.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2-policy-intention-becomes-reported-meetings-then-an-explicit-further-commitment\">2. Policy intention becomes reported meetings, then an explicit further commitment</h2>\n<p>Reuse the accepted IPO2022 strategy Policy section and IPO2022/23 Counter infringement section; no new download. The strategy describes industry work on KYBC and a cross-departmental forum. The annual report says IPO hosted several cross-Whitehall forum meetings looking at KYBC rules. Neither names an agreed text or resulting duty. Retained source: ../pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09/priority-ipo2023.html, SHA256 b7f1c94f0df2269776c32aeff112d2f7af7a3ee9da51c1f2046164b40486ab16; the accepted root-strategy-comparison.md holds the exact relevant extract. Earlier strategy original ../pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09/referral-strategy2022.html, SHA256 9dcb6d69ad37942b0b4005543be05e9f4561eb854659d149e0f95510067e0654. These are reused previously scoped reads, not new whole-document reads in this run.</p>\n<p>The June2023 Creative Industries Sector Vision, CP863, makes the next intention explicit: following previous roundtables, government will engage tech and creative sectors to explore potential KYBC requirements and consider CMA-highlighted issues, including proactive steps against infringing content. Relevant original: [Sector Vision PDF](http[local research file] PDF21 / printed18. The immediately preceding item names DSIT, IPO and DCMS on the IP framework, but the KYBC item says government; it does not allocate final rulemaking powers among these bodies. No roundtable attendee list, agreed minutes, regulatory text, commencement date or customer remedy appears in this item. Read cover and complete relevant page only, not the full report. Original disposition-vision2023.pdf SHA256 0be393e3229e41fbc2fda3fa452c809330f86e1d9c5f8ff82240d2b655450bd6.</p>\n<h2 id=\"3-a-narrower-advertiser-verification-proposal-july-2023\">3. A narrower advertiser-verification proposal: July 2023</h2>\n<p>[DCMS government response to Online Advertising Programme consultation](http[local research file] updated25July2023. Read original executive summary and nextsteps, Part1 Our response, and complete Part4 including respondent views and government response. Original disposition-oap2023.html SHA256 be9abb21a66d4e85f6835d3fcc84fc766d9e9fad2a10d0abd1116e714d083721.</p>\n<p>The government envisages statutory duties on platforms, intermediaries and publishers (PIPs) in paid-for advertising, including reciprocal arrangements, aimed at illegal advertising and separately protecting under18s from adverts for products/services illegal to sell to them. It excludes owned media such as a brand&#x27;s own website and free-to-post classified ads from this programme. Advertisers themselves are essentially carved out of the proposed new regimes, yet would have to align with PIP measures, with advertiser identity verification given as an example used only when necessary/appropriate and with regulators deciding extent. Further consultation would settle scope/functions, powers and proportionate responsibilities, considering control over ads, size and reach. Legislation is promised subject to parliamentary time; this response is not the legislation.</p>\n<p>Part4 records disagreements over pre-vetting, business burdens and sensitive commercial data, and the government says it will work with regulators to incentivise good practice rather than punish every breach. Those are actual policy constraints and competing stakeholder positions, not an unconditional demand to admit no unverified customer. The same source attributes strengthened financial-advertiser checks on most large platforms to FCA engagement; that is a government-reported narrower antecedent, not proof those firms implemented this IP industry&#x27;s proposal. No specific universal identifier, identity-document requirement, duty to stop hosting/payment services, or customer appeal is established by the inspected OAP proposal.</p>\n<p>This is a mechanism comparison with KYBC, not a proven direct descendant of the IPO forum or Alliance/MPA text. The programme&#x27;s separate child-protection aim is not evidence that business verification is consumer age-ID.</p>\n<h2 id=\"4-an-implemented-deliberative-mechanism-not-enacted-kybc-februarymarch-2026\">4. An implemented deliberative mechanism, not enacted KYBC: February/March 2026</h2>\n<p>[26February2026 Online Advertising Taskforce minutes](http[local research file] entire2pages read. Meeting date is explicit; do not use it as a separately verified publication date. Original disposition-taskforce2026.pdf SHA256 3be65d983a4ff7d0c911580d628c6952f6f837f87f46b4aabe4c30370e792ee6.</p>\n<p>Section4 records that Sinead Coogan-Jobes of IAB UK presented the new Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group&#x27;s draft terms of reference and yearly plan, which taskforce members agreed. The group had been set up following the November2025 meeting. Its forthcoming mapping exercise would identify standards/mechanisms to detect, disrupt and prevent malicious advertising entering the supply chain. This is actual reported collective approval of a work plan; the precise terms themselves were not acquired, and these minutes do not grant the group powers to compel verification or disconnection.</p>\n<p>Section2 separately reports pilot participants sharing fraud-related signals, with initially modest volume. That is a reported pilot action, not evidence of identity verification or a demonstrated enforcement outcome. Section5 separately records DSIT/ISBA updates about legitimate advertising funding legal-but-harmful content and evidence gathering with platforms, civil society, industry and brand-safety/verification services. This is an explicit adjacent policy discussion, not an adopted KYBC criterion or a takedown order. The age-assurance pilot in section3 has a different subject and is not used to support business-verification claims.</p>\n<p>[Home Office Fraud Strategy2026-2029](http[local research file] March2026, CP1523. Read cover/imprint and originalPDF26-28, printed22-24, section4.4. Original disposition-fraud2026.pdf SHA256 71e581136a25391c1722208bae114213965f2736fb8a2b920e34aee8732d0864.</p>\n<p>Paragraph55 says wider programmatic advertising largely falls outside the then-current Online Safety Act scope. It reports Home Office and DCMS launching a partnership with IAB UK under the taskforce, reporting to ministers in early2027. If industry partnership and market incentives are insufficient, the government says it will legislate within this Parliament. This supports a current-at-publication policy pathway and a conditional legislative threat, not a commenced blanket KYBC rule. It does not identify the IPO forum as author or describe the broader infrastructure proposal as accepted or rejected wholesale.</p>\n<p>Keep paragraph54 separate. It describes enacted Online Safety Act fraudulent-advertising duties for services designated Category1 or Category2A, with proportionate systems/processes to prevent paid-for fraudulent adverts. As of this March strategy, Ofcom consultation was aimed at summer2026 and commencement expected2027. It describes fines and, in the most serious non-compliance cases, court-ordered business-disruption measures potentially involving payment, advertising or internet service providers. The threshold is service non-compliance with Act duties, not merely an unverified commercial customer&#x27;s identity. Paragraph56 separately dates illegal user-generated-content duties to March2025. This packet has not independently audited the underlying statutory provisions, commencement instruments or post-March2026 Ofcom timetable: it cannot certify September2026 commencement or transplant that separate authority into KYBC. The exact current operational advertising-code or court-remedy question remains a later instrument-level task if selected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"consequential-comparison-and-candidate-relations\">Consequential comparison and candidate relations</h2>\n<p>The proved sequence is government acknowledgment -&gt; official meetings -&gt; further exploration. The acquired material has no final accepted cross-infrastructure KYBC text. A narrower, related advertising proposal supplies an example of identity verification with regulatory discretion; a later official partnership supplies actual plan approval and report-back accountability. These may represent delay, alternative targeting or parallel policy origins. This finite record does not distinguish those explanations through private negotiation or prove that no other UK verification duties exist.</p>\n<p>Candidate typed relations, not case additions: UKGovernment -&gt; committee recommendation23 [policy response/consideration, September2021]; IPO -&gt; cross-Whitehall forum [reported convening inFY2022/23, reuse]; SectorVision -&gt; tech/creative sectors [planned engagement on potentialKYBC, June2023]; DCMS OAP proposal -&gt; PIPs [proposed systems obligations and conditional advertiser-verification example, July2023]; OATmembers -&gt; AdFraudandStandardsWG workplan [reported collective approval,26February2026]; HomeOffice/DCMS -&gt; IABUK partnership [reported launch, March2026]; partnership -&gt; ministers [planned report-back, early2027]; government -&gt; further advertising legislation [conditional intention]. A comparison edge between the IP proposal and advertising instruments should say related mechanism, not authorship or implementation. Do not infer a paid grant from the word partnership.</p>\n<p>The highest-value missing record is the IPO/DCMS cross-Whitehall KYBC options or disposition paper, with the actual draft text/meeting decision showing whether infrastructure-wide identity checks and stop-service consequences were accepted, narrowed, rejected or parked, and why. Its public institutional holders are IPO/DSIT/DCMS as evidenced by the strategy and vision; this is a record target, not a claim a particular unpublished document exists. The February2026 working-group terms/accepted plan and eventual ministerial report would settle the newer advertising authority path; taskforce minutes alone do not provide enforcement rights or customer remedies.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-and-acquisition-frontier\">Reading and acquisition frontier</h2>\n<p>Manifest disposition-captures.json identifies four successful official original captures, one403 error response, and the official-reader substitute for that failed original. Scope-limited extracts carry separate hashes/ancestry. Full-file extraction is not full-file reading. Originalvision webreader failed once with InternalError; ordinary publicGET succeeded. Music originalGET403 is closed; only the already-successful officialreader was used as the substitute. No closed LegInfo, LinkedIn, PIPCU, UN or other routes were retried.</p>\n<p>Finite discovery comprised exact KYBC/business-customer searches limited to gov.uk, Parliament and Hansard, then targeted OnlineAdvertisingProgramme/verification and2025/2026 disposition searches. Several noisy search returns were cut off by the tool; only relevant visible/recovered items were assessed. Irrelevant trademark-journal results and general AML/gambling material were excluded. Search-only leads for Ofcom telecom checks, the OnlineFraudCharter,2023/24 taskforce progress,2025minutes and private industry commentary were not promoted into facts or independently acquired here. No EU rules, company-registration duties or consumer-age scheme was substituted for the requested policy trace. The exact selected originalURLs above, and scoped notes rather than search snippets, support the findings. This is a bounded negative frontier, not proof of universal legislative absence.</p>\n<p>Acquisition closed at the original2026 strategy and2-page minutes. No further branch opened.</p>",
        "path": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09/disposition-rules.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-music-response2021",
          "w29-enf-s-sector-vision2023",
          "w29-enf-s-oap-response2023",
          "w29-enf-s-fraud-strategy2026",
          "w29-enf-s-oat-minutes2026"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. No canonical case, reader or ZIP changed. This is a source-scoped policy comparison, not a legal opinion or an exhaustive current UK statute search.\n\nThe acquired government record establishes that KYBC reached the policy agenda and cross-departmental discussion. It does not establish adoption of the IP groups' broader proposal requiring underlying commercial infrastructure providers to verify all business customers and stop serving those they cannot verify. A related but narrower advertiser-verification proposal appears in the 2023 Online Advertising Programme response. Separately, the March 2026 Fraud Strategy describes a current government/IAB UK partnership with an early-2027 report-back and conditional legislation, alongside a distinct statutory fraudulent-advertising regime whose commencement was then expected in 2027. Do not merge these into one enacted KYBC instrument or attribute the advertising pathway to Alliance without a transmission record.\n\n## 1. Explicit government acknowledgment: September 2021\n\nSource: House of Commons DCMS Committee, HC719, Economics of music streaming: Government and Competition and Markets Authority Responses, response received 15 September and published 22 September 2021. Official document (see source references) Read title/introduction and recommendation23 with its complete government response, PDF10-11 / printed8-9, readerlines364-415.\n\nRecommendation23 asks government to address recording-industry concerns about enforcement of existing KYBC obligations. The appended GOVERNMENT response says KYBC for IP enforcement warrants further attention and the upcoming infringement strategy will consider it; IPO plans work with other departments on possible improvements. This is an identifiable government response to a committee recommendation, rather than an inference from shared vocabulary. It does not name a new verifier, required identification method, service-suspension trigger, sanction or appeal. Its surrounding discussion of licensing, EU Article17 and private civil action must not be treated as adoption of the broader KYBC proposal.\n\nCustody: ordinary original GET returned403 and is closed. Error bytes retained separately; their hash does not authenticate the report. The successful official webreader is the credible substitute, retained as disposition-music2021.reader.txt. The cover/date was separately read through that reader, not recovered as original PDF bytes. See manifest.\n\n## 2. Policy intention becomes reported meetings, then an explicit further commitment\n\nReuse the accepted IPO2022 strategy Policy section and IPO2022/23 Counter infringement section; no new download. The strategy describes industry work on KYBC and a cross-departmental forum. The annual report says IPO hosted several cross-Whitehall forum meetings looking at KYBC rules. Neither names an agreed text or resulting duty. Retained source: ../pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09/priority-ipo2023.html, SHA256 b7f1c94f0df2269776c32aeff112d2f7af7a3ee9da51c1f2046164b40486ab16; the accepted root-strategy-comparison.md holds the exact relevant extract. Earlier strategy original ../pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09/referral-strategy2022.html, SHA256 9dcb6d69ad37942b0b4005543be05e9f4561eb854659d149e0f95510067e0654. These are reused previously scoped reads, not new whole-document reads in this run.\n\nThe June2023 Creative Industries Sector Vision, CP863, makes the next intention explicit: following previous roundtables, government will engage tech and creative sectors to explore potential KYBC requirements and consider CMA-highlighted issues, including proactive steps against infringing content. Relevant original: Sector Vision PDF (see source references) PDF21 / printed18. The immediately preceding item names DSIT, IPO and DCMS on the IP framework, but the KYBC item says government; it does not allocate final rulemaking powers among these bodies. No roundtable attendee list, agreed minutes, regulatory text, commencement date or customer remedy appears in this item. Read cover and complete relevant page only, not the full report. Original disposition-vision2023.pdf SHA256 0be393e3229e41fbc2fda3fa452c809330f86e1d9c5f8ff82240d2b655450bd6.\n\n## 3. A narrower advertiser-verification proposal: July 2023\n\nDCMS government response to Online Advertising Programme consultation (see source references) updated25July2023. Read original executive summary and nextsteps, Part1 Our response, and complete Part4 including respondent views and government response. Original disposition-oap2023.html SHA256 be9abb21a66d4e85f6835d3fcc84fc766d9e9fad2a10d0abd1116e714d083721.\n\nThe government envisages statutory duties on platforms, intermediaries and publishers (PIPs) in paid-for advertising, including reciprocal arrangements, aimed at illegal advertising and separately protecting under18s from adverts for products/services illegal to sell to them. It excludes owned media such as a brand's own website and free-to-post classified ads from this programme. Advertisers themselves are essentially carved out of the proposed new regimes, yet would have to align with PIP measures, with advertiser identity verification given as an example used only when necessary/appropriate and with regulators deciding extent. Further consultation would settle scope/functions, powers and proportionate responsibilities, considering control over ads, size and reach. Legislation is promised subject to parliamentary time; this response is not the legislation.\n\nPart4 records disagreements over pre-vetting, business burdens and sensitive commercial data, and the government says it will work with regulators to incentivise good practice rather than punish every breach. Those are actual policy constraints and competing stakeholder positions, not an unconditional demand to admit no unverified customer. The same source attributes strengthened financial-advertiser checks on most large platforms to FCA engagement; that is a government-reported narrower antecedent, not proof those firms implemented this IP industry's proposal. No specific universal identifier, identity-document requirement, duty to stop hosting/payment services, or customer appeal is established by the inspected OAP proposal.\n\nThis is a mechanism comparison with KYBC, not a proven direct descendant of the IPO forum or Alliance/MPA text. The programme's separate child-protection aim is not evidence that business verification is consumer age-ID.\n\n## 4. An implemented deliberative mechanism, not enacted KYBC: February/March 2026\n\n26February2026 Online Advertising Taskforce minutes (see source references) entire2pages read. Meeting date is explicit; do not use it as a separately verified publication date. Original disposition-taskforce2026.pdf SHA256 3be65d983a4ff7d0c911580d628c6952f6f837f87f46b4aabe4c30370e792ee6.\n\nSection4 records that Sinead Coogan-Jobes of IAB UK presented the new Ad Fraud and Standards Working Group's draft terms of reference and yearly plan, which taskforce members agreed. The group had been set up following the November2025 meeting. Its forthcoming mapping exercise would identify standards/mechanisms to detect, disrupt and prevent malicious advertising entering the supply chain. This is actual reported collective approval of a work plan; the precise terms themselves were not acquired, and these minutes do not grant the group powers to compel verification or disconnection.\n\nSection2 separately reports pilot participants sharing fraud-related signals, with initially modest volume. That is a reported pilot action, not evidence of identity verification or a demonstrated enforcement outcome. Section5 separately records DSIT/ISBA updates about legitimate advertising funding legal-but-harmful content and evidence gathering with platforms, civil society, industry and brand-safety/verification services. This is an explicit adjacent policy discussion, not an adopted KYBC criterion or a takedown order. The age-assurance pilot in section3 has a different subject and is not used to support business-verification claims.\n\nHome Office Fraud Strategy2026-2029 (see source references) March2026, CP1523. Read cover/imprint and originalPDF26-28, printed22-24, section4.4. Original disposition-fraud2026.pdf SHA256 71e581136a25391c1722208bae114213965f2736fb8a2b920e34aee8732d0864.\n\nParagraph55 says wider programmatic advertising largely falls outside the then-current Online Safety Act scope. It reports Home Office and DCMS launching a partnership with IAB UK under the taskforce, reporting to ministers in early2027. If industry partnership and market incentives are insufficient, the government says it will legislate within this Parliament. This supports a current-at-publication policy pathway and a conditional legislative threat, not a commenced blanket KYBC rule. It does not identify the IPO forum as author or describe the broader infrastructure proposal as accepted or rejected wholesale.\n\nKeep paragraph54 separate. It describes enacted Online Safety Act fraudulent-advertising duties for services designated Category1 or Category2A, with proportionate systems/processes to prevent paid-for fraudulent adverts. As of this March strategy, Ofcom consultation was aimed at summer2026 and commencement expected2027. It describes fines and, in the most serious non-compliance cases, court-ordered business-disruption measures potentially involving payment, advertising or internet service providers. The threshold is service non-compliance with Act duties, not merely an unverified commercial customer's identity. Paragraph56 separately dates illegal user-generated-content duties to March2025. This packet has not independently audited the underlying statutory provisions, commencement instruments or post-March2026 Ofcom timetable: it cannot certify September2026 commencement or transplant that separate authority into KYBC. The exact current operational advertising-code or court-remedy question remains a later instrument-level task if selected.\n\n## Consequential comparison and candidate relations\n\nThe proved sequence is government acknowledgment -> official meetings -> further exploration. The acquired material has no final accepted cross-infrastructure KYBC text. A narrower, related advertising proposal supplies an example of identity verification with regulatory discretion; a later official partnership supplies actual plan approval and report-back accountability. These may represent delay, alternative targeting or parallel policy origins. This finite record does not distinguish those explanations through private negotiation or prove that no other UK verification duties exist.\n\nCandidate typed relations, not case additions: UKGovernment -> committee recommendation23 [policy response/consideration, September2021]; IPO -> cross-Whitehall forum [reported convening inFY2022/23, reuse]; SectorVision -> tech/creative sectors [planned engagement on potentialKYBC, June2023]; DCMS OAP proposal -> PIPs [proposed systems obligations and conditional advertiser-verification example, July2023]; OATmembers -> AdFraudandStandardsWG workplan [reported collective approval,26February2026]; HomeOffice/DCMS -> IABUK partnership [reported launch, March2026]; partnership -> ministers [planned report-back, early2027]; government -> further advertising legislation [conditional intention]. A comparison edge between the IP proposal and advertising instruments should say related mechanism, not authorship or implementation. Do not infer a paid grant from the word partnership.\n\nThe highest-value missing record is the IPO/DCMS cross-Whitehall KYBC options or disposition paper, with the actual draft text/meeting decision showing whether infrastructure-wide identity checks and stop-service consequences were accepted, narrowed, rejected or parked, and why. Its public institutional holders are IPO/DSIT/DCMS as evidenced by the strategy and vision; this is a record target, not a claim a particular unpublished document exists. The February2026 working-group terms/accepted plan and eventual ministerial report would settle the newer advertising authority path; taskforce minutes alone do not provide enforcement rights or customer remedies.\n\n## Reading and acquisition frontier\n\nManifest disposition-captures.json identifies four successful official original captures, one403 error response, and the official-reader substitute for that failed original. Scope-limited extracts carry separate hashes/ancestry. Full-file extraction is not full-file reading. Originalvision webreader failed once with InternalError; ordinary publicGET succeeded. Music originalGET403 is closed; only the already-successful officialreader was used as the substitute. No closed LegInfo, LinkedIn, PIPCU, UN or other routes were retried.\n\nFinite discovery comprised exact KYBC/business-customer searches limited to gov.uk, Parliament and Hansard, then targeted OnlineAdvertisingProgramme/verification and2025/2026 disposition searches. Several noisy search returns were cut off by the tool; only relevant visible/recovered items were assessed. Irrelevant trademark-journal results and general AML/gambling material were excluded. Search-only leads for Ofcom telecom checks, the OnlineFraudCharter,2023/24 taskforce progress,2025minutes and private industry commentary were not promoted into facts or independently acquired here. No EU rules, company-registration duties or consumer-age scheme was substituted for the requested policy trace. The exact selected originalURLs above, and scoped notes rather than search snippets, support the findings. This is a bounded negative frontier, not proof of universal legislative absence.\n\nAcquisition closed at the original2026 strategy and2-page minutes. No further branch opened.\n",
        "file": "research/kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-rules.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission",
        "title": "KYBC: dated proposals and their UK transmission routes",
        "description": "Closed 9 September 2026. Four submissions now establish a public UK advocacy trail before the previously inspected IPO forum account. The earliest internally dated Alliance document in this pass is August 2020. This is not a claim that the Alliance invented KYBC or was its first proponent.",
        "html": "<p>Closed 9 September 2026. Four submissions now establish a public UK advocacy trail before the previously inspected IPO forum account. The earliest internally dated Alliance document acquired in this pass is August 2020. This is not a claim that the Alliance invented KYBC or was its first proponent.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-reached-which-institution\">What reached which institution</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Document and date boundary</th>\n<th>Proposer → recorded recipient/venue</th>\n<th>Decisive request and locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>[Alliance response to Digital Markets Taskforce](http[local research file] internally <strong>August 2020</strong>; CMA publication <strong>8 December 2020</strong></td>\n<td>Alliance for Intellectual Property → CMA Digital Markets Taskforce call for information</td>\n<td>PDF 3, response to questions 5–8, seeks verification duties across critical business infrastructure, including providers without Strategic Market Status; it proposes hosting/payment-access consequences for illicit businesses ignoring self-disclosure. PDF 4 proposes a code-of-conduct/enforcement route.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[BPI response to the same call](http[local research file] labelled <strong>Redacted version November 2020</strong> at PDF 18; CMA publication <strong>8 December 2020</strong></td>\n<td>BPI → CMA Digital Markets Taskforce</td>\n<td>PDF 17, §4.2.2, proposes regular verification and service termination for withheld or incorrect information. PDF 6, §3, identifies intermediary categories; PDF 16 places the remedies under proposed codes and a duty of care.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Alliance OSB0016](http[local research file] internally <strong>September 2021</strong></td>\n<td>Alliance → Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill</td>\n<td>PDF 2–3, The problem &amp; potential solution, seeks KYBC duties for all business-infrastructure intermediaries, beyond the Bill&#x27;s scope; an appropriate legislative vehicle and hosting/payment-access consequences. PDF 3 Summary asks Parliamentarians to press government.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[MPA FDF0068](http[local research file] internally <strong>10 May 2022</strong> at PDF 21; contains a briefing labelled <strong>September 2021</strong></td>\n<td>MPA → Lords Fraud Act 2006 and Digital Fraud Committee; transmits a briefing from rightsholders on the Creative Industries Council IP subgroup</td>\n<td>Main §§19–28, PDF 5–7, proposes identity verification and asks the Committee to encourage named departments into the IPO forum. Annex 2, PDF 9–13, supplies the rightsholder proposal, coverage and sanctions.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The [CMA&#x27;s original case index](http[local research file] Responses to call for information, explicitly links both 2020 responses with the 8 December publication date. Its timetable distinguishes the 1 July call launch and 31 July deadline from publication. The deadline is <strong>not</strong> the proven date of either submission. Alliance&#x27;s August document date and BPI&#x27;s November redacted-version date remain separate from the unacquired initial submission/receipt records. Publication by the recipient establishes entry into a policy process; it does not establish that the recipient accepted the requested rules.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-proposed-intervention-was-more-specific-than-a-slogan\">The proposed intervention was more specific than a slogan</h2>\n<p>Alliance&#x27;s August 2020 response, PDF 1–2, explains why it sought a regulatory route: it regarded voluntary industry roundtables as slow and Online Harms proposals as excluding IP infringement. Its response to questions 5–8 expands beyond firms with Strategic Market Status; it seeks verification coupled with denial of critical infrastructure. The September 2021 submission repeats that demand in a different parliamentary venue and cites the Digital Markets Taskforce&#x27;s December 2020 recommendation, G22(13b), to strengthen powers against unlawful activity causing economic detriment. This is an explicit citation and request for scrutiny, not proof that the Taskforce specifically adopted Alliance&#x27;s KYBC design. Its assessment of the then-current e-commerce law remains attributed advocacy, not this packet&#x27;s legal conclusion.</p>\n<p>BPI&#x27;s §4.2.2 specifies verified name, physical address, email and telephone; for legal entities, current director/responsible-person information, with bank-detail checks suggested where appropriate. Records would be checked regularly. Its proposed consequence attaches to withheld or incorrect information, without making a separately proved infringement a stated prerequisite in that clause. Section 3, PDF 6, includes CDNs, hosting, payments, domain registrars/registries, advertising networks and app stores among intermediaries. This is a broad business-customer proposal, not a requirement for government ID or age checks on every consumer. BPI&#x27;s proposed information access for legitimate rightsholder enforcement also deserves distinction from publication of every customer&#x27;s details.</p>\n<p>The CIC briefing&#x27;s Q3–5, PDF 12–13 of the MPA submission, extends across interactive platforms, content delivery, hosting/CDNs, registrars/registries, DNS, proxies, email, financial and advertising services. Privacy-protection companies would themselves have duties rather than count as the end customer. Failure or inability to verify the commercial customer would require service cessation; direct obligations and financial penalties would coexist with existing liability privileges. This is a briefing <strong>from listed rightsholders on the IP subgroup</strong>, not demonstrated approval by the full CIC or government. Its September 2021 dating/tabling is attributed through MPA&#x27;s later submission. Main §26 asks the Lords to encourage BEIS, DCMS, Home Office, Treasury and Justice into the proposed forum. Commercial customers need not be incorporated companies; sole traders or commercial social-media users are not expressly excluded. The inspected demand sections supply no detailed challenge procedure for an unsuccessful verification.</p>\n<h2 id=\"transmission-evidence-and-limits\">Transmission evidence and limits</h2>\n<p>Three distinct relations are now supported: named organizations <strong>submitted</strong> identifiable proposals; the CMA and parliamentary sites <strong>published</strong> them; and proponents <strong>cited and sought action through</strong> government policy processes. The MPA carries an earlier rightsholder briefing into its later fraud evidence. Those are actual document paths, stronger than a shared vocabulary or contemporary roster. They still do not prove whose argument caused a later decision.</p>\n<p>The retained IPO 2022 strategy, under the cross-departmental policy discussion, calls KYBC an industry-developed potential solution and says action requires departmental collaboration. The accepted IPO 2022/23 account reports forum meetings. They do not name the Alliance as originator. This pass makes the chronology possible without filling that attribution gap. The undated current Alliance webpage can now be compared with its dated 2020/2021 positions; it cannot establish the date of the webpage itself.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to an Alliance-led causal account is convergent advocacy by several rightsholder groups, drawing on existing identity/enforcement ideas and approaching multiple forums. Root&#x27;s separate <code>research-input.md</code> examines the explicitly cited RUSI input. No EU legislative survey, corporate genealogy or new agency branch was pursued here. The MPA&#x27;s annex references to other reports and coalitions are references by the submitter, not independent verification of each underlying publication. Industry case allegations were not adopted as verified findings about the named services.</p>\n<p>The remaining discriminating records are recipient minutes or correspondence identifying which paper was considered; the CIC subgroup&#x27;s tabling/adoption record; and a government decision that accepts, narrows or rejects specific verification, service-cessation and sanction features. Root/Linnaeus own the disposition comparison. This packet does not infer enacted duties from any submission, a pilot-funded priority or a universal consumer-identification rule.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-scope\">Custody and scope</h2>\n<p><code>origins-captures.json</code> records exact URLs, hashes, dates and read scopes. Two original CMA-published PDFs and the original CMA index HTML are retained. Alliance&#x27;s four-page response was read in full; BPI was read at the recorded sections, not all nineteen pages. Local renders of Alliance PDF 3 and BPI PDF 17 were visually inspected and agree with the decisive extracted text. BPI&#x27;s public file identifies itself as a redacted version; no unredacted counterpart was sought.</p>\n<p>The two parliamentary PDF preservation GETs returned 403. Their working public readers supplied the substantive text; the error HTML is not the source document. MPA&#x27;s PDF reader exposes the Annex 1 and summary text absent from the HTML rendition, but a single batched screenshot request for PDF pages 8, 9, 12 and 13 returned Cache miss. No image inspection or original-byte custody is asserted for those documents, and the routes were not retried. <code>origins-reader-scopes.json</code> preserves the exact reading boundaries and locator notes; it is a derivative, not a facsimile.</p>\n<p>Acquisition closed at this dated-submission/transmission breakpoint. No case, atlas, ZIP, current-work or forest file was changed.</p>",
        "path": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09/origins-transmission.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-cma2020",
          "w29-enf-s-bpi-cma2020",
          "w29-enf-s-cma-index",
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-osb2021",
          "w29-enf-s-mpa-fdf0068"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed 9 September 2026. Four submissions now establish a public UK advocacy trail before the previously inspected IPO forum account. The earliest internally dated Alliance document acquired in this pass is August 2020. This is not a claim that the Alliance invented KYBC or was its first proponent.\n\n## What reached which institution\n\n| Document and date boundary | Proposer → recorded recipient/venue | Decisive request and locator |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Alliance response to Digital Markets Taskforce (see source references) internally **August 2020**; CMA publication **8 December 2020** | Alliance for Intellectual Property → CMA Digital Markets Taskforce call for information | PDF 3, response to questions 5–8, seeks verification duties across critical business infrastructure, including providers without Strategic Market Status; it proposes hosting/payment-access consequences for illicit businesses ignoring self-disclosure. PDF 4 proposes a code-of-conduct/enforcement route. |\n| BPI response to the same call (see source references) labelled **Redacted version November 2020** at PDF 18; CMA publication **8 December 2020** | BPI → CMA Digital Markets Taskforce | PDF 17, §4.2.2, proposes regular verification and service termination for withheld or incorrect information. PDF 6, §3, identifies intermediary categories; PDF 16 places the remedies under proposed codes and a duty of care. |\n| Alliance OSB0016 (see source references) internally **September 2021** | Alliance → Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill | PDF 2–3, The problem & potential solution, seeks KYBC duties for all business-infrastructure intermediaries, beyond the Bill's scope; an appropriate legislative vehicle and hosting/payment-access consequences. PDF 3 Summary asks Parliamentarians to press government. |\n| MPA FDF0068 (see source references) internally **10 May 2022** at PDF 21; contains a briefing labelled **September 2021** | MPA → Lords Fraud Act 2006 and Digital Fraud Committee; transmits a briefing from rightsholders on the Creative Industries Council IP subgroup | Main §§19–28, PDF 5–7, proposes identity verification and asks the Committee to encourage named departments into the IPO forum. Annex 2, PDF 9–13, supplies the rightsholder proposal, coverage and sanctions. |\n\nThe CMA's original case index (see source references) Responses to call for information, explicitly links both 2020 responses with the 8 December publication date. Its timetable distinguishes the 1 July call launch and 31 July deadline from publication. The deadline is **not** the proven date of either submission. Alliance's August document date and BPI's November redacted-version date remain separate from the unacquired initial submission/receipt records. Publication by the recipient establishes entry into a policy process; it does not establish that the recipient accepted the requested rules.\n\n## The proposed intervention was more specific than a slogan\n\nAlliance's August 2020 response, PDF 1–2, explains why it sought a regulatory route: it regarded voluntary industry roundtables as slow and Online Harms proposals as excluding IP infringement. Its response to questions 5–8 expands beyond firms with Strategic Market Status; it seeks verification coupled with denial of critical infrastructure. The September 2021 submission repeats that demand in a different parliamentary venue and cites the Digital Markets Taskforce's December 2020 recommendation, G22(13b), to strengthen powers against unlawful activity causing economic detriment. This is an explicit citation and request for scrutiny, not proof that the Taskforce specifically adopted Alliance's KYBC design. Its assessment of the then-current e-commerce law remains attributed advocacy, not this packet's legal conclusion.\n\nBPI's §4.2.2 specifies verified name, physical address, email and telephone; for legal entities, current director/responsible-person information, with bank-detail checks suggested where appropriate. Records would be checked regularly. Its proposed consequence attaches to withheld or incorrect information, without making a separately proved infringement a stated prerequisite in that clause. Section 3, PDF 6, includes CDNs, hosting, payments, domain registrars/registries, advertising networks and app stores among intermediaries. This is a broad business-customer proposal, not a requirement for government ID or age checks on every consumer. BPI's proposed information access for legitimate rightsholder enforcement also deserves distinction from publication of every customer's details.\n\nThe CIC briefing's Q3–5, PDF 12–13 of the MPA submission, extends across interactive platforms, content delivery, hosting/CDNs, registrars/registries, DNS, proxies, email, financial and advertising services. Privacy-protection companies would themselves have duties rather than count as the end customer. Failure or inability to verify the commercial customer would require service cessation; direct obligations and financial penalties would coexist with existing liability privileges. This is a briefing **from listed rightsholders on the IP subgroup**, not demonstrated approval by the full CIC or government. Its September 2021 dating/tabling is attributed through MPA's later submission. Main §26 asks the Lords to encourage BEIS, DCMS, Home Office, Treasury and Justice into the proposed forum. Commercial customers need not be incorporated companies; sole traders or commercial social-media users are not expressly excluded. The inspected demand sections supply no detailed challenge procedure for an unsuccessful verification.\n\n## Transmission evidence and limits\n\nThree distinct relations are now supported: named organizations **submitted** identifiable proposals; the CMA and parliamentary sites **published** them; and proponents **cited and sought action through** government policy processes. The MPA carries an earlier rightsholder briefing into its later fraud evidence. Those are actual document paths, stronger than a shared vocabulary or contemporary roster. They still do not prove whose argument caused a later decision.\n\nThe retained IPO 2022 strategy, under the cross-departmental policy discussion, calls KYBC an industry-developed potential solution and says action requires departmental collaboration. The accepted IPO 2022/23 account reports forum meetings. They do not name the Alliance as originator. This pass makes the chronology possible without filling that attribution gap. The undated current Alliance webpage can now be compared with its dated 2020/2021 positions; it cannot establish the date of the webpage itself.\n\nThe strongest rival to an Alliance-led causal account is convergent advocacy by several rightsholder groups, drawing on existing identity/enforcement ideas and approaching multiple forums. Root's separate `research-input.md` examines the explicitly cited RUSI input. No EU legislative survey, corporate genealogy or new agency branch was pursued here. The MPA's annex references to other reports and coalitions are references by the submitter, not independent verification of each underlying publication. Industry case allegations were not adopted as verified findings about the named services.\n\nThe remaining discriminating records are recipient minutes or correspondence identifying which paper was considered; the CIC subgroup's tabling/adoption record; and a government decision that accepts, narrows or rejects specific verification, service-cessation and sanction features. Root/Linnaeus own the disposition comparison. This packet does not infer enacted duties from any submission, a pilot-funded priority or a universal consumer-identification rule.\n\n## Custody and scope\n\n`origins-captures.json` records exact URLs, hashes, dates and read scopes. Two original CMA-published PDFs and the original CMA index HTML are retained. Alliance's four-page response was read in full; BPI was read at the recorded sections, not all nineteen pages. Local renders of Alliance PDF 3 and BPI PDF 17 were visually inspected and agree with the decisive extracted text. BPI's public file identifies itself as a redacted version; no unredacted counterpart was sought.\n\nThe two parliamentary PDF preservation GETs returned 403. Their working public readers supplied the substantive text; the error HTML is not the source document. MPA's PDF reader exposes the Annex 1 and summary text absent from the HTML rendition, but a single batched screenshot request for PDF pages 8, 9, 12 and 13 returned Cache miss. No image inspection or original-byte custody is asserted for those documents, and the routes were not retried. `origins-reader-scopes.json` preserves the exact reading boundaries and locator notes; it is a derivative, not a facsimile.\n\nAcquisition closed at this dated-submission/transmission breakpoint. No case, atlas, ZIP, current-work or forest file was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input",
        "title": "Research input: named co-funding, data provision and later KYBC citation",
        "description": "9 September2026. Bounded root acquisition CLOSED after one original report directly cited by MPA's parliamentary evidence. This follows a specific source/input edge within the KYBC origins run, not a general RUSI or donor investigation.",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Bounded root acquisition CLOSED after one original report directly cited by MPA&#x27;s parliamentary evidence. This follows a specific source/input edge within the KYBC origins run, not a general RUSI or donor investigation.</p>\n<p>The [March2021 RUSI Whitehall Report4-20, Taking the Profit Out of Intellectual Property Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime](http[local research file] by Ardi Janjeva, Alexandria Reid and Anton Moiseienko, names five co-funders in its Acknowledgements, PDF8/printedvii: UK Intellectual Property Office, Alliance for Intellectual Property, Motion Picture Association, Industry Trust and Premier League. It supplies no amounts, allocation, payment dates, executed agreement or funder approval rights. Industry Trust remains the source&#x27;s label, without a new legal-identity reconciliation. The authors also credit primary information supplied by funders, PIPCU, BBC Studios and other named/unnamed organizations. Co-funding and supplying material are separate resource relations.</p>\n<p>The same acknowledgment says findings and recommendations were independently reached and not influenced by funders. Methodology, PDF18–19/printed5–6, describes a targeted literature review, interviews with77experts between February and September2020, and primary-data review. Recruitment used literature, snowball sampling and invited self-nominations; interview categories include government, enforcement, providers, financial compliance, rightsholders/associations, protection vendors and academics. Two one-hour January2021 validation workshops excluded representatives of funders and prompted revisions. Some contributed evidence cannot be reproduced because of sensitivity. This establishes the authors&#x27; reported method and independence measures; it is not an independent check of all underlying interviews/data, a representative sample or a reviewed funder contract. The unreproduced material limits replication but does not establish fabrication or improper direction.</p>\n<p>The executive summary and Recommendations, PDF82–83/printed69–70, combine several proposed mechanisms. Recommendation2 calls for an IPO/PIPCU public-private intelligence partnership including financial and online-service actors. Recommendation4 calls for business-customer identity recording/verification to the extent possible in the online-harms review, with compliance resources. Recommendation14 urges financial institutions to use named infringement lists when assessing exposure and taking appropriate action, including ending relationships or filing suspicious-activity reports. Recommendation15 urges providers to verify customers as best practice regardless of whether formal KYBC rules are introduced, qualified by what is reasonably possible. These are recommendations, not acquired regulator orders, provider policies or executed payment denials.</p>\n<p>Other recommendations call for more financial investigation, acquiring-bank scrutiny and education of crypto-asset service providers. Those are particular anti-piracy proposals in2021; they do not establish later implementation, a general control system over spending or a stablecoin-debt scheme. The report distinguishes counterfeiting from audiovisual piracy and this scoped note does not import its piracy findings into every counterfeit-domain suspension. Its industry/consumer harm estimates and alleged case facts have not been independently verified by this root read and are not adopted here.</p>\n<p>A specific downstream use is observable. [MPA evidence FDF0068, dated10May2022](http[local research file] paragraph18 and footnote12, cites this report&#x27;s KYBC recommendation as support for action. MPA is also a named co-funder in the report. That establishes a co-funder citing the resulting research in parliamentary advocacy. It does not establish that MPA dictated the finding or that Parliament/government accepted it. Alliance&#x27;s separately located August2020 submission predates this publication; the report is not established as the first origin of the proposal. The funding, inputs, publication, citation and actual government decision should be drawn as different edges.</p>\n<p>The copyright/version page, PDF3, identifies March2021 and records textual changes on10and19March2021. Original retained root-rusi2021.pdf SHA25603d13de395767d5c5db7e5419ea60b6caa795e955468af7953814742dabbdce0,84pages,2164009bytes. Root read original-extracted PDF2,3,8,18,19,80,81,82,83; executive summaryPDF10–12 was read through the official public reader. Exact scope and derivative ancestry are in root-rusi2021-capture.json. An extracted page is not automatically substantively read. No facsimile/graph audit or full84-page review is claimed.</p>\n<p>Root&#x27;s MPA reading covered substantive main paragraphs1–28, Annex2 policy questions1–5 and signatory list, source date and footnotes through the official reader. Image-only Annex1/summary/case material was not visually inspected. Other returned case allegations were seen as source claims but not independently verified or used to establish ownership/criminal liability. Carver&#x27;s separately scoped originals/reader custody and source chronology govern the origins packet. No operational content, accounts, inquiries or funder contact occurred. Acquisition is closed for combined review/forest.</p>",
        "path": "kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09/research-input.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-rusi2021"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Bounded root acquisition CLOSED after one original report directly cited by MPA's parliamentary evidence. This follows a specific source/input edge within the KYBC origins run, not a general RUSI or donor investigation.\n\nThe March2021 RUSI Whitehall Report4-20, Taking the Profit Out of Intellectual Property Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime (see source references) by Ardi Janjeva, Alexandria Reid and Anton Moiseienko, names five co-funders in its Acknowledgements, PDF8/printedvii: UK Intellectual Property Office, Alliance for Intellectual Property, Motion Picture Association, Industry Trust and Premier League. It supplies no amounts, allocation, payment dates, executed agreement or funder approval rights. Industry Trust remains the source's label, without a new legal-identity reconciliation. The authors also credit primary information supplied by funders, PIPCU, BBC Studios and other named/unnamed organizations. Co-funding and supplying material are separate resource relations.\n\nThe same acknowledgment says findings and recommendations were independently reached and not influenced by funders. Methodology, PDF18–19/printed5–6, describes a targeted literature review, interviews with77experts between February and September2020, and primary-data review. Recruitment used literature, snowball sampling and invited self-nominations; interview categories include government, enforcement, providers, financial compliance, rightsholders/associations, protection vendors and academics. Two one-hour January2021 validation workshops excluded representatives of funders and prompted revisions. Some contributed evidence cannot be reproduced because of sensitivity. This establishes the authors' reported method and independence measures; it is not an independent check of all underlying interviews/data, a representative sample or a reviewed funder contract. The unreproduced material limits replication but does not establish fabrication or improper direction.\n\nThe executive summary and Recommendations, PDF82–83/printed69–70, combine several proposed mechanisms. Recommendation2 calls for an IPO/PIPCU public-private intelligence partnership including financial and online-service actors. Recommendation4 calls for business-customer identity recording/verification to the extent possible in the online-harms review, with compliance resources. Recommendation14 urges financial institutions to use named infringement lists when assessing exposure and taking appropriate action, including ending relationships or filing suspicious-activity reports. Recommendation15 urges providers to verify customers as best practice regardless of whether formal KYBC rules are introduced, qualified by what is reasonably possible. These are recommendations, not acquired regulator orders, provider policies or executed payment denials.\n\nOther recommendations call for more financial investigation, acquiring-bank scrutiny and education of crypto-asset service providers. Those are particular anti-piracy proposals in2021; they do not establish later implementation, a general control system over spending or a stablecoin-debt scheme. The report distinguishes counterfeiting from audiovisual piracy and this scoped note does not import its piracy findings into every counterfeit-domain suspension. Its industry/consumer harm estimates and alleged case facts have not been independently verified by this root read and are not adopted here.\n\nA specific downstream use is observable. MPA evidence FDF0068, dated10May2022 (see source references) paragraph18 and footnote12, cites this report's KYBC recommendation as support for action. MPA is also a named co-funder in the report. That establishes a co-funder citing the resulting research in parliamentary advocacy. It does not establish that MPA dictated the finding or that Parliament/government accepted it. Alliance's separately located August2020 submission predates this publication; the report is not established as the first origin of the proposal. The funding, inputs, publication, citation and actual government decision should be drawn as different edges.\n\nThe copyright/version page, PDF3, identifies March2021 and records textual changes on10and19March2021. Original retained root-rusi2021.pdf SHA25603d13de395767d5c5db7e5419ea60b6caa795e955468af7953814742dabbdce0,84pages,2164009bytes. Root read original-extracted PDF2,3,8,18,19,80,81,82,83; executive summaryPDF10–12 was read through the official public reader. Exact scope and derivative ancestry are in root-rusi2021-capture.json. An extracted page is not automatically substantively read. No facsimile/graph audit or full84-page review is claimed.\n\nRoot's MPA reading covered substantive main paragraphs1–28, Annex2 policy questions1–5 and signatory list, source date and footnotes through the official reader. Image-only Annex1/summary/case material was not visually inspected. Other returned case allegations were seen as source claims but not independently verified or used to establish ownership/criminal liability. Carver's separately scoped originals/reader custody and source chronology govern the origins packet. No operational content, accounts, inquiries or funder contact occurred. Acquisition is closed for combined review/forest.\n",
        "file": "research/kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-research-input.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings",
        "title": "Liberty's TCN challenge predates the identified DFF grant",
        "description": "Closed on 9 September 2026 after the recipient account and one official judgment, including its publication landing page. The official record confirms proceedings existed in March 2025; the identified DFF grant was reported approved in June 2026. It therefore supports an existing challenge. These records do not establish how the case was initially financed, ",
        "html": "<p>Closed on 9 September 2026 after the recipient account and one official judgment, including its publication landing page. The official record confirms proceedings existed in March 2025; the identified DFF grant was reported approved in June 2026. It therefore supports an existing challenge. These records do not establish how the case was initially financed, whether DFF supported it earlier, or whether the later grant reimbursed particular work.</p>\n<h2 id=\"initiation-parties-and-requested-action\">Initiation, parties and requested action</h2>\n<p>Liberty&#x27;s [13 March 2025 announcement](http[local research file] says legal complaints were filed that day by Liberty, Privacy International, Gus Hosein and Ben Wizner. It distinguishes challenges to the reported notice and the TCN process from an urgent request for an open hearing. The organisations instructed Leigh Day. Their account identifies the alleged notice power as section 253 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 and argues incompatibility with the statutory purpose, regulations, privacy and expression rights. Those arguments are the claimants&#x27; position, not findings of unlawfulness. The reported notice itself was not acquired.</p>\n<p>They also sought coordination with Apple&#x27;s proceedings, attendance, disclosure and public scrutiny. No original pleading was acquired, so the precise pleaded causes of action, full remedies and jurisdictional statutory provisions remain unverified beyond this account and the court&#x27;s limited description. Do not equate the asserted notice power with the statutory route by which every claim was brought. Source scope: official-reader lines 48–96, retained in <code>proceedings-liberty2025.reader.txt</code>. The ordinary HTML GET returned 403; only its error body was captured, and that route is closed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-tribunal-actually-decided\">What the tribunal actually decided</h2>\n<p>[Apple Inc v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2025] UKIPTrib 1](http[local research file] case IPT/25/68/CH, is dated <strong>7 April 2025</strong>, following a <strong>14 March hearing</strong>. Paragraph 33 (PDF8) confirms that Liberty, Privacy International and two individuals filed their separate complaint the day before that hearing: <strong>13 March 2025</strong>. It identifies potential overlap and invites case-management proposals, not completed joinder (§§33–35).</p>\n<p>The tribunal dismissed the government&#x27;s application to keep the basic case details private (§§32,42–43). It considered Liberty/PI&#x27;s written arguments but kept the March hearing private (§37); intervention, pleading disclosure and future hearing arrangements remained unresolved (§§38,40). It also lacked power to grant US legislators&#x27; requested permission to discuss the alleged notice (§39).</p>\n<p>This was a procedural ruling, not a decision that encryption-access powers were unlawful. The public judgment is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment (§6), and expressly neither confirms nor refutes the media account (§20). Its procedural framework discusses RIPA 2000 section 69 and Tribunal Rule 7 (§§26–30); that is not the missing pleading&#x27;s complete jurisdictional basis.</p>\n<h2 id=\"consequence-and-remaining-record\">Consequence and remaining record</h2>\n<p>The judicial acknowledgment independently strengthens the initiation date; it does not independently prove a grant payment or DFF&#x27;s causal role. The previously accepted DFF announcement and linked EUR 36,000 case listing remain the sources for the reported June 2026 allocation. They were not reacquired or counted as new corroboration here.</p>\n<p>The useful distinction is support for continuing litigation, participation in a procedural contest, and success on that procedural question. It would be wrong to turn these into a claim that DFF initiated the March 2025 action, that Liberty obtained a merits victory over TCNs, or that every hearing became public. Multiple parties made open-justice arguments, so acknowledgment of Liberty/PI&#x27;s submissions is not proof they alone caused the result. The historic decision is not a current docket or finality check.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is the actual public Liberty/PI pleading or a later published tribunal disposition, if made available. That would establish the exact statutory claim route, pleaded remedies and any substantive ruling. No private judgment, secret notice, protected-party identification or further Apple chronology was sought.</p>\n<h2 id=\"original-custody-and-reading-scope\">Original custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p>The [Judiciary publication page](http[local research file] was captured as <code>proceedings-judiciary.html</code>; its actual PDF href led to <code>proceedings-public-judgment2025.pdf</code>, SHA-256 <code>d19a2c0e350f5bb7f279c7d5cb8eb3d0563a46458a214fc4f327a905d2197f3b</code>. Both ordinary GETs succeeded. The PDF reader returned zero text lines and local text extraction was empty. <strong>The nine PDF pages were all rendered and visually read</strong>, including the caption and paragraphs 1–43. Images are <code>proceedings-judgment-p01.png</code> through <code>p09.png</code>. The <code>.derived.txt</code> file contains only page markers and is not a substantive text source. No OCR transcript is claimed.</p>\n<p><code>proceedings-captures.json</code> records original/error/reader distinctions, hashes, access and precise page scopes. The source record excludes unrelated Liberty cases and indexed commentary. No second litigation instrument was necessary for this bounded result. No graph, forest, current-work, visual presentation, package, account or outreach changes were made. Acquisition is closed for root review.</p>",
        "path": "liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09/proceedings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling",
          "w32-gdi-s-judgment"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed on 9 September 2026 after the recipient account and one official judgment, including its publication landing page. The official record confirms proceedings existed in March 2025; the identified DFF grant was reported approved in June 2026. It therefore supports an existing challenge. These records do not establish how the case was initially financed, whether DFF supported it earlier, or whether the later grant reimbursed particular work.\n\n## Initiation, parties and requested action\n\nLiberty's 13 March 2025 announcement (see source references) says legal complaints were filed that day by Liberty, Privacy International, Gus Hosein and Ben Wizner. It distinguishes challenges to the reported notice and the TCN process from an urgent request for an open hearing. The organisations instructed Leigh Day. Their account identifies the alleged notice power as section 253 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 and argues incompatibility with the statutory purpose, regulations, privacy and expression rights. Those arguments are the claimants' position, not findings of unlawfulness. The reported notice itself was not acquired.\n\nThey also sought coordination with Apple's proceedings, attendance, disclosure and public scrutiny. No original pleading was acquired, so the precise pleaded causes of action, full remedies and jurisdictional statutory provisions remain unverified beyond this account and the court's limited description. Do not equate the asserted notice power with the statutory route by which every claim was brought. Source scope: official-reader lines 48–96, retained in `proceedings-liberty2025.reader.txt`. The ordinary HTML GET returned 403; only its error body was captured, and that route is closed.\n\n## What the tribunal actually decided\n\n[Apple Inc v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2025] UKIPTrib 1] (see source references) case IPT/25/68/CH, is dated **7 April 2025**, following a **14 March hearing**. Paragraph 33 (PDF8) confirms that Liberty, Privacy International and two individuals filed their separate complaint the day before that hearing: **13 March 2025**. It identifies potential overlap and invites case-management proposals, not completed joinder (§§33–35).\n\nThe tribunal dismissed the government's application to keep the basic case details private (§§32,42–43). It considered Liberty/PI's written arguments but kept the March hearing private (§37); intervention, pleading disclosure and future hearing arrangements remained unresolved (§§38,40). It also lacked power to grant US legislators' requested permission to discuss the alleged notice (§39).\n\nThis was a procedural ruling, not a decision that encryption-access powers were unlawful. The public judgment is a summary/extract of a fuller private judgment (§6), and expressly neither confirms nor refutes the media account (§20). Its procedural framework discusses RIPA 2000 section 69 and Tribunal Rule 7 (§§26–30); that is not the missing pleading's complete jurisdictional basis.\n\n## Consequence and remaining record\n\nThe judicial acknowledgment independently strengthens the initiation date; it does not independently prove a grant payment or DFF's causal role. The previously accepted DFF announcement and linked EUR 36,000 case listing remain the sources for the reported June 2026 allocation. They were not reacquired or counted as new corroboration here.\n\nThe useful distinction is support for continuing litigation, participation in a procedural contest, and success on that procedural question. It would be wrong to turn these into a claim that DFF initiated the March 2025 action, that Liberty obtained a merits victory over TCNs, or that every hearing became public. Multiple parties made open-justice arguments, so acknowledgment of Liberty/PI's submissions is not proof they alone caused the result. The historic decision is not a current docket or finality check.\n\nThe next discriminating record is the actual public Liberty/PI pleading or a later published tribunal disposition, if made available. That would establish the exact statutory claim route, pleaded remedies and any substantive ruling. No private judgment, secret notice, protected-party identification or further Apple chronology was sought.\n\n## Original custody and reading scope\n\nThe Judiciary publication page (see source references) was captured as `proceedings-judiciary.html`; its actual PDF href led to `proceedings-public-judgment2025.pdf`, SHA-256 `d19a2c0e350f5bb7f279c7d5cb8eb3d0563a46458a214fc4f327a905d2197f3b`. Both ordinary GETs succeeded. The PDF reader returned zero text lines and local text extraction was empty. **The nine PDF pages were all rendered and visually read**, including the caption and paragraphs 1–43. Images are `proceedings-judgment-p01.png` through `p09.png`. The `.derived.txt` file contains only page markers and is not a substantive text source. No OCR transcript is claimed.\n\n`proceedings-captures.json` records original/error/reader distinctions, hashes, access and precise page scopes. The source record excludes unrelated Liberty cases and indexed commentary. No second litigation instrument was necessary for this bounded result. No graph, forest, current-work, visual presentation, package, account or outreach changes were made. Acquisition is closed for root review.\n",
        "file": "research/liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin",
        "title": "Full Fact's request behind the ministerial-notice reference",
        "description": "Single-source acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. The regulator-hosted response(httplocal research file is dated 17 October 2025 on PDF20. Ofcom's response index displays 11 December 2025, a separate publication/listing date.",
        "html": "<p>Single-source acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. The [regulator-hosted response](http[local research file] is dated <strong>17 October 2025</strong> on PDF20. Ofcom&#x27;s response index displays 11 December 2025, a separate publication/listing date.</p>\n<p>Full Fact advocated a broader crisis framework and stronger Ofcom supervision, coupled with constraints on discretion. The cited page 17 principally requests expansion/alignment of the crisis definition with section 175. It does <strong>not expressly propose automatic activation of a platform protocol on receipt of a ministerial notice</strong>, nor supply the wording eventually added by Ofcom. It also is not merely a request to constrain government: the wider response seeks materially broader regulatory coverage and coordination.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-page-17-actually-says\">What page 17 actually says</h2>\n<p>At <strong>paragraph76, PDF17</strong>, Full Fact argues that the proposed definition is too narrowly directed at public safety. It asks to include public health and national security, aligning the definition with section 175 and comparing the EU Digital Services Act&#x27;s crisis definition. It describes the existing Secretary of State route to Ofcom&#x27;s media-literacy priorities or public statement notices. This is a scope-alignment argument using an existing power as a benchmark, not a newly drafted executive activation power.</p>\n<p>At <strong>paragraph77, PDF17</strong>, it asks for a clear, transparent, widely understood crisis definition, evidence and proportionality, and severity indicators. It also proposes covering clusters of misleading claims/narratives and slow-onset incidents, as well as discrete sudden events.</p>\n<p>At <strong>paragraph78, PDF17–18</strong>, it says government bodies likely already have incident definitions, criticizes the lack of transparency around that framework, and recommends Ofcom seek insight and align definitions to improve public/private coordination. The government-practice claims are Full Fact&#x27;s account; the underlying sources were not acquired here.</p>\n<p>At <strong>paragraph79, PDF18</strong>, it recognizes that Ofcom&#x27;s judgment about whether an incident occurred may differ from a provider&#x27;s judgment. It proposes shared indicators to make those judgments more understandable. It does not confer authority on Full Fact to declare a binding crisis.</p>\n<h2 id=\"surrounding-authority-and-safeguards\">Surrounding authority and safeguards</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Request within the same submission</th>\n<th>Precise location</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Legislative review to address systemic and collective misinformation harms, including legal-but-harmful adult content, with expression safeguards. Full Fact acknowledges wider legal reform lies beyond this consultation.</td>\n<td>Paragraphs12–15, PDF4</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>A centralized Ofcom information-incident framework; advance communication channels with police, government, other providers and civil society; provider notifications to Ofcom and users when protocols start/end.</td>\n<td>Paragraphs29–34, PDF7–8</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Stronger Ofcom supervision of effectiveness and proportionality; remedial steps where necessary, including protection of expression. Provider discretion should sit within clearer command structures and accountability.</td>\n<td>Paragraphs38–44, PDF9–10</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Written decision logs, evidence preservation where appropriate, indicators/risk assessments for de-escalation and ending a crisis, and clear responsibility for starting/stopping it. The stated purpose includes avoiding indefinite crises and misuse.</td>\n<td>Paragraphs62–67, PDF14–15</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Routine submission of post-crisis analyses to Ofcom, ongoing regulatory review, and publicly available summaries of Ofcom&#x27;s assessment/recommendations.</td>\n<td>Paragraphs71–72, PDF16</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are proposed process safeguards, not evidence that an affected user&#x27;s post or account would be restored or that a particular appeal succeeded. Full Fact&#x27;s proportionality argument also criticizes a focus on minimizing provider costs and asks that the severity of harms be weighed (paragraphs86–90, PDF20). Its argument combines stronger intervention with accountability; either half alone would misrepresent the response.</p>\n<p>A related institutional boundary appears in <strong>paragraph52, PDF12</strong>: Full Fact acknowledges that Ofcom cannot currently mandate changes to platforms&#x27; partnership policies to require working with fact checkers. <strong>Paragraphs53–54, PDF12</strong> separately seek guaranteed, meaningful data access for accredited fact checkers and enforceable consequences for non-cooperation. This is advocacy for a future entitlement, not an existing award, partnership mandate or acquired data-access right. No donor or organizational genealogy was pursued.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-can-be-joined-to-ofcoms-drafting-change\">What can be joined to Ofcom&#x27;s drafting change</h2>\n<p>The accepted <a href=\"/research/ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority\">root operational note</a> records Ofcom&#x27;s statement 3.46–47/footnote29, PDF17, identifying Full Fact&#x27;s response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on 4 August 2025 as inputs to questions about the interaction. Ofcom&#x27;s resulting amendment says providers should consider an Ofcom public statement notice alongside their other indicators.</p>\n<p>Reading the actual response narrows that attribution: Full Fact supplied a definition/coordination argument involving section 175, while the regulator&#x27;s eventual notice-consideration wording is not found as an explicit Full Fact instruction in the inspected text. The response&#x27;s 17 October date is later than the 4 August meeting. It cannot by itself prove Full Fact initiated that meeting&#x27;s question, attended it, co-drafted the amendment or controlled the wording. No such inference is made.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to a direct ministerial-trigger lobbying account is that Ofcom resolved an interaction surfaced by differently framed stakeholder inputs. The remaining discriminating record is the 4 August2025 Ofcom/DSIT meeting note or drafting record showing what was asked, by whom, and how the final wording was chosen. Root owns that separate public search.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-reading-limits\">Custody and reading limits</h2>\n<p>The ordinary GET returned 403 and was closed. No original PDF was acquired. <a>fullfact-reader.txt</a> retains 825 of 829 official-reader lines, covering substantive paragraphs 1–90 across 20 PDF pages; omitted lines 577–580 are explicitly marked. Decisive paragraphs76–79 and surrounding authority/safeguard passages were read in full. The extracted PDF has irregular internal spacing, preserved rather than silently normalized. No images or linked case evidence, DSA text, Full Fact framework, government framework or external report were independently inspected in this lane.</p>\n<p><a>fullfact-captures.json</a> records source/date/scope, reader custody and the retained 403 error. The reader derivative is not original-byte custody. Acquisition is complete; no broader branch was opened.</p>",
        "path": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09/fullfact-origin.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-fullfact"
        ],
        "markdown": "Single-source acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. The regulator-hosted response (see source references) is dated **17 October 2025** on PDF20. Ofcom's response index displays 11 December 2025, a separate publication/listing date.\n\nFull Fact advocated a broader crisis framework and stronger Ofcom supervision, coupled with constraints on discretion. The cited page 17 principally requests expansion/alignment of the crisis definition with section 175. It does **not expressly propose automatic activation of a platform protocol on receipt of a ministerial notice**, nor supply the wording eventually added by Ofcom. It also is not merely a request to constrain government: the wider response seeks materially broader regulatory coverage and coordination.\n\n## What page 17 actually says\n\nAt **paragraph76, PDF17**, Full Fact argues that the proposed definition is too narrowly directed at public safety. It asks to include public health and national security, aligning the definition with section 175 and comparing the EU Digital Services Act's crisis definition. It describes the existing Secretary of State route to Ofcom's media-literacy priorities or public statement notices. This is a scope-alignment argument using an existing power as a benchmark, not a newly drafted executive activation power.\n\nAt **paragraph77, PDF17**, it asks for a clear, transparent, widely understood crisis definition, evidence and proportionality, and severity indicators. It also proposes covering clusters of misleading claims/narratives and slow-onset incidents, as well as discrete sudden events.\n\nAt **paragraph78, PDF17–18**, it says government bodies likely already have incident definitions, criticizes the lack of transparency around that framework, and recommends Ofcom seek insight and align definitions to improve public/private coordination. The government-practice claims are Full Fact's account; the underlying sources were not acquired here.\n\nAt **paragraph79, PDF18**, it recognizes that Ofcom's judgment about whether an incident occurred may differ from a provider's judgment. It proposes shared indicators to make those judgments more understandable. It does not confer authority on Full Fact to declare a binding crisis.\n\n## Surrounding authority and safeguards\n\n| Request within the same submission | Precise location |\n| --- | --- |\n| Legislative review to address systemic and collective misinformation harms, including legal-but-harmful adult content, with expression safeguards. Full Fact acknowledges wider legal reform lies beyond this consultation. | Paragraphs12–15, PDF4 |\n| A centralized Ofcom information-incident framework; advance communication channels with police, government, other providers and civil society; provider notifications to Ofcom and users when protocols start/end. | Paragraphs29–34, PDF7–8 |\n| Stronger Ofcom supervision of effectiveness and proportionality; remedial steps where necessary, including protection of expression. Provider discretion should sit within clearer command structures and accountability. | Paragraphs38–44, PDF9–10 |\n| Written decision logs, evidence preservation where appropriate, indicators/risk assessments for de-escalation and ending a crisis, and clear responsibility for starting/stopping it. The stated purpose includes avoiding indefinite crises and misuse. | Paragraphs62–67, PDF14–15 |\n| Routine submission of post-crisis analyses to Ofcom, ongoing regulatory review, and publicly available summaries of Ofcom's assessment/recommendations. | Paragraphs71–72, PDF16 |\n\nThese are proposed process safeguards, not evidence that an affected user's post or account would be restored or that a particular appeal succeeded. Full Fact's proportionality argument also criticizes a focus on minimizing provider costs and asks that the severity of harms be weighed (paragraphs86–90, PDF20). Its argument combines stronger intervention with accountability; either half alone would misrepresent the response.\n\nA related institutional boundary appears in **paragraph52, PDF12**: Full Fact acknowledges that Ofcom cannot currently mandate changes to platforms' partnership policies to require working with fact checkers. **Paragraphs53–54, PDF12** separately seek guaranteed, meaningful data access for accredited fact checkers and enforceable consequences for non-cooperation. This is advocacy for a future entitlement, not an existing award, partnership mandate or acquired data-access right. No donor or organizational genealogy was pursued.\n\n## What can be joined to Ofcom's drafting change\n\nThe accepted [root operational note](ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority.md) records Ofcom's statement 3.46–47/footnote29, PDF17, identifying Full Fact's response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on 4 August 2025 as inputs to questions about the interaction. Ofcom's resulting amendment says providers should consider an Ofcom public statement notice alongside their other indicators.\n\nReading the actual response narrows that attribution: Full Fact supplied a definition/coordination argument involving section 175, while the regulator's eventual notice-consideration wording is not found as an explicit Full Fact instruction in the inspected text. The response's 17 October date is later than the 4 August meeting. It cannot by itself prove Full Fact initiated that meeting's question, attended it, co-drafted the amendment or controlled the wording. No such inference is made.\n\nThe strongest rival to a direct ministerial-trigger lobbying account is that Ofcom resolved an interaction surfaced by differently framed stakeholder inputs. The remaining discriminating record is the 4 August2025 Ofcom/DSIT meeting note or drafting record showing what was asked, by whom, and how the final wording was chosen. Root owns that separate public search.\n\n## Custody and reading limits\n\nThe ordinary GET returned 403 and was closed. No original PDF was acquired. fullfact-reader.txt retains 825 of 829 official-reader lines, covering substantive paragraphs 1–90 across 20 PDF pages; omitted lines 577–580 are explicitly marked. Decisive paragraphs76–79 and surrounding authority/safeguard passages were read in full. The extracted PDF has irregular internal spacing, preserved rather than silently normalized. No images or linked case evidence, DSA text, Full Fact framework, government framework or external report were independently inspected in this lane.\n\nfullfact-captures.json records source/date/scope, reader custody and the retained 403 error. The reader derivative is not original-byte custody. Acquisition is complete; no broader branch was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin",
        "title": "The cited DSIT meeting and confirmed planning records",
        "description": "Root's bounded public acquisition closed9September2026. Ofcom's June crisis statement3.46-47/footnote29, PDF17, cites an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on4August2025, alongside Full Fact's responsep17, as questions about the interaction of section175 directions and the crisis measures. The statement then identifies its amendment requiring consideration of an issued publ",
        "html": "<p>Root&#x27;s bounded public acquisition closed9September2026. Ofcom&#x27;s June crisis statement3.46-47/footnote29, PDF17, cites an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on4August2025, alongside Full Fact&#x27;s responsep17, as questions about the interaction of section175 directions and the crisis measures. The statement then identifies its amendment requiring consideration of an issued public statement notice. The dated regulator attribution is established; an agenda, attendee list, minute, submitted briefing or agreed action from that meeting was not obtained.</p>\n<p>Five bounded exact-date/actor searches, plus the existing Ofcom FOI-response index searched for DSIT/date/crisis, did not locate the meeting document. An unrelated spectrum document&#x27;s printing date, broad ministerial meeting lists from a different quarter, and unrelated spending records were not treated as meeting evidence. There is no inference that the meeting was ministerial rather than official-level, involved a named minister, was secret, or was held at Full Fact&#x27;s request. A dated citation establishes a claimed exchange; it does not identify each participant&#x27;s position or approval rights.</p>\n<p>The FOI index did expose a directly relevant existing response. Ofcom reference02210914, dated19June2026, replies to a request received12June about the protocol&#x27;s drafting timeline and emergency-enforcement criteria. Original URL: http[local research file] . All95reader lines across four pages were read; crisis-planning-foi.reader.txt retains the official-reader derivative. No original PDF bytes acquired and no new request sent.</p>\n<p>In its own answer to1(a)-(c), PDF2, Ofcom confirms an initial internal planning document, says work commenced23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary of State correspondence, and says final approval was completed between21May and26May2026. These are agency statements about its records, not the underlying planning document, letters or signed approvals. They establish a precise prior planning/approval trail to seek; they do not disclose the4August2025meeting or who approved the text. The requester-provided Belfast narrative onPDF1 is separately attributed and is not Ofcom&#x27;s confirmation of every background claim.</p>\n<p>Question3 asks for a decision record explaining why the10June2026open letter was selected instead of formal enforcement. Ofcom says it does not hold information within that question&#x27;s scope, explaining that sending a conducive letter did not exclude other actions and no such either/or decision was made. This is a scoped response, not a claim that no briefing or approval for the letter exists at all. The response directs emergency-enforcement criteria to its published guidance3.8-3.9; that guidance was not reacquired in this lane. Its statement that a separate Grok investigation remained open is historical19June status and is not adopted as current.</p>\n<p>Most revealing remaining records: the meeting note/action log or briefing for4August2025; the confirmed initial planning document; the21-26May2026approval material and comparison against the consulted draft. Ofcom and DSIT are indicated holders for the meeting; Ofcom expressly confirms holding the planning record. Public acquisition is finite and closed. Any later information request requires separate outreach authority. The Full Fact passage is acquired in the independent companion lane, including its actual17October2025document date; that later date prevents treating the submission itself as proof it initiated the August meeting.</p>",
        "path": "ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09/meeting-origin.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-planningfoi"
        ],
        "markdown": "Root's bounded public acquisition closed9September2026. Ofcom's June crisis statement3.46-47/footnote29, PDF17, cites an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on4August2025, alongside Full Fact's responsep17, as questions about the interaction of section175 directions and the crisis measures. The statement then identifies its amendment requiring consideration of an issued public statement notice. The dated regulator attribution is established; an agenda, attendee list, minute, submitted briefing or agreed action from that meeting was not obtained.\n\nFive bounded exact-date/actor searches, plus the existing Ofcom FOI-response index searched for DSIT/date/crisis, did not locate the meeting document. An unrelated spectrum document's printing date, broad ministerial meeting lists from a different quarter, and unrelated spending records were not treated as meeting evidence. There is no inference that the meeting was ministerial rather than official-level, involved a named minister, was secret, or was held at Full Fact's request. A dated citation establishes a claimed exchange; it does not identify each participant's position or approval rights.\n\nThe FOI index did expose a directly relevant existing response. Ofcom reference02210914, dated19June2026, replies to a request received12June about the protocol's drafting timeline and emergency-enforcement criteria. Original URL: http[local research file] . All95reader lines across four pages were read; crisis-planning-foi.reader.txt retains the official-reader derivative. No original PDF bytes acquired and no new request sent.\n\nIn its own answer to1(a)-(c), PDF2, Ofcom confirms an initial internal planning document, says work commenced23October2024 following17October parliamentary and22October Secretary of State correspondence, and says final approval was completed between21May and26May2026. These are agency statements about its records, not the underlying planning document, letters or signed approvals. They establish a precise prior planning/approval trail to seek; they do not disclose the4August2025meeting or who approved the text. The requester-provided Belfast narrative onPDF1 is separately attributed and is not Ofcom's confirmation of every background claim.\n\nQuestion3 asks for a decision record explaining why the10June2026open letter was selected instead of formal enforcement. Ofcom says it does not hold information within that question's scope, explaining that sending a conducive letter did not exclude other actions and no such either/or decision was made. This is a scoped response, not a claim that no briefing or approval for the letter exists at all. The response directs emergency-enforcement criteria to its published guidance3.8-3.9; that guidance was not reacquired in this lane. Its statement that a separate Grok investigation remained open is historical19June status and is not adopted as current.\n\nMost revealing remaining records: the meeting note/action log or briefing for4August2025; the confirmed initial planning document; the21-26May2026approval material and comparison against the consulted draft. Ofcom and DSIT are indicated holders for the meeting; Ofcom expressly confirms holding the planning record. Public acquisition is finite and closed. Any later information request requires separate outreach authority. The Full Fact passage is acquired in the independent companion lane, including its actual17October2025document date; that later date prevents treating the submission itself as proof it initiated the August meeting.\n",
        "file": "research/ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-meeting-origin.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism",
        "title": "Public officials ask payment networks to use private rules",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded run: who originated the August 2025 multistate NCII intervention, what action it sought, and whether a response or consequence is established. NCII means nonconsensual intimate imagery. This packet does not investigate or link to the offending services themselves.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded run: who originated the August 2025 multistate NCII intervention, what action it sought, and whether a response or consequence is established. NCII means nonconsensual intimate imagery. This packet does not investigate or link to the offending services themselves.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-instrument-and-the-action\">The instrument and the action</h2>\n<p>The [22 August 2025 combined letters](http[local research file] contain separate payment and search interventions. Payment addressees are the legal officers of Visa, Mastercard, American Express, PayPal, Google and Apple, addressed as Google Pay and Apple Pay. Block/Cash App is not a payment addressee. The payment body asks for current controls and further action, using existing terms and acceptable-use policies to identify and remove sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content proactively. This is seller-level exclusion, not merely deletion of an individual image.</p>\n<p>The payment body does not supply an operative statutory provision, case number, sanction, compulsory response deadline, seller list or named bank instruction. Its First Amendment assurance is the authors&#x27; position, not a judicial decision. Prior Pornhub and Civitai cutoffs appear as cited precedents; they cannot be outcomes caused by this later letter. The separate search letter asks for restrictions, warnings and redirects and refers to the Take It Down Act. Neither instrument establishes a recipient&#x27;s actual subsequent decision. See PDF1-3 and9-11.</p>\n<h2 id=\"origin-and-collective-endorsement\">Origin and collective endorsement</h2>\n<p><a>Pennsylvania&#x27;s 26 August announcement</a>.</p>\n<p>The original visibly uses NAAG letterhead and the 2025 officers: John Formella, William Tong, Marty Jackley and Letitia James, with Brian Kane as executive director. The current September 2026 leadership page belongs to a different observation date. Published May 2026 signature procedures describe a later process; without the actual 2025 circulation record they do not establish the historical approval steps for these letters. Actual sponsor instructions, edits, signature confirmations and transmission/receipt records remain unacquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-later-threat-changes-the-interpretation\">A later threat changes the interpretation</h2>\n<p>In his [19 September 2025 official newsletter](http[local research file] signatory Raul Labrador describes the coalition letters as a choice between safeguards and legal consequences. Root read the complete substantive body, including the links to the two letters. This makes an account of entirely consequence-free persuasion inadequate: at least one participating AG publicly attached threatened legal consequences to the demand. The newsletter still supplies no filed case, operative order, meeting, recipient response or completed company change. It is not evidence that every co-signatory adopted that later characterization. Its statements about search behavior and prevalence are advocacy claims, not independently tested results in this run.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-joins-and-what-it-does-not\">What this joins, and what it does not</h2>\n<p>The supported mechanism is coordinated public-office pressure directed at company counsel, seeking decisions under private network rules. This offers a concrete conversion point between government advocacy and commercial exclusion. It does not require proving that an AG owns or controls a payment company. The July Cash App NAAG reimbursement belongs to a different investigation; no allocation or expense record connects that money to this letter campaign.</p>\n<p>At the same time, the presence of company discretion does not establish an unconstrained or wholly voluntary choice. Official threats, existing law, reputational exposure and company policy may interact. We need a recipient&#x27;s reply, counsel assessment, merchant/acquirer instruction, actual restriction or later enforcement record to determine which interaction occurred here. We have no basis to assign these letters responsibility for Steam removals, a general pornography prohibition, or universal identity requirements. The seller-level scope makes collateral reach a concrete question, but actual overbreadth requires a worked case.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-and-custody\">Reading and custody</h2>\n<p>Root read all 15 pages of the NAAG combined-letter web-reader representation in the preceding acquisition phase and all returned text of the Pennsylvania indexed copy in this run. Root reread the retained live Pennsylvania payment body and visually inspected PDF1; the content and 15-page structure match the inspected representations at the substantive clauses, without claiming byte identity across hosts. Root also read the entire retained Pennsylvania announcement main body. Vermont&#x27;s complete substantive announcement was returned in search; direct reader open returned403, so this packet does not pretend that route succeeded.</p>\n<p>The indexed Pennsylvania /2025/09/ PDF URL returned404 through ordinary GET despite a working indexed reader. Its retained pa-letters.pdf is an error response, explicitly marked false in captures-root.json. The exact PDF href in the successful announcement led to pa-letters-live.pdf, a successful original: 1,397,552 bytes, SHA256 75db0aba797ff32ebf992254f169571c2385611f171fb87b6f055e6e09c88a97. PDF metadata shows a September2 modification, not a proven publication or drafting date. No metadata-based authorship inference is made. Pennsylvania announcement: 122,926 bytes, SHA256 c1780ae668b126d546a9dece7107b5171c7bf666a91a3cafdf09cfaa0ed9b120. The failed path is closed, not repeatedly retried.</p>\n<p>Independent letter review is in independent-letter-review.md; response-search.md records the bounded outcome lane and any secondary follow-up leads. The letter&#x27;s cited prevalence infographic has not been audited; its percentages are not adopted as this campaign&#x27;s findings. No outreach, target-service use, paid route, account access or submission occurred.</p>",
        "path": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09/letter-mechanism.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-pa-authorship",
          "w24-ag-s-letters"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded run: who originated the August 2025 multistate NCII intervention, what action it sought, and whether a response or consequence is established. NCII means nonconsensual intimate imagery. This packet does not investigate or link to the offending services themselves.\n\n## The instrument and the action\n\nThe 22 August 2025 combined letters (see source references) contain separate payment and search interventions. Payment addressees are the legal officers of Visa, Mastercard, American Express, PayPal, Google and Apple, addressed as Google Pay and Apple Pay. Block/Cash App is not a payment addressee. The payment body asks for current controls and further action, using existing terms and acceptable-use policies to identify and remove sellers of deepfake NCII tools/content proactively. This is seller-level exclusion, not merely deletion of an individual image.\n\nThe payment body does not supply an operative statutory provision, case number, sanction, compulsory response deadline, seller list or named bank instruction. Its First Amendment assurance is the authors' position, not a judicial decision. Prior Pornhub and Civitai cutoffs appear as cited precedents; they cannot be outcomes caused by this later letter. The separate search letter asks for restrictions, warnings and redirects and refers to the Take It Down Act. Neither instrument establishes a recipient's actual subsequent decision. See PDF1-3 and9-11.\n\n## Origin and collective endorsement\n\nPennsylvania's 26 August announcement.\n\nThe original visibly uses NAAG letterhead and the 2025 officers: John Formella, William Tong, Marty Jackley and Letitia James, with Brian Kane as executive director. The current September 2026 leadership page belongs to a different observation date. Published May 2026 signature procedures describe a later process; without the actual 2025 circulation record they do not establish the historical approval steps for these letters. Actual sponsor instructions, edits, signature confirmations and transmission/receipt records remain unacquired.\n\n## A later threat changes the interpretation\n\nIn his 19 September 2025 official newsletter (see source references) signatory Raul Labrador describes the coalition letters as a choice between safeguards and legal consequences. Root read the complete substantive body, including the links to the two letters. This makes an account of entirely consequence-free persuasion inadequate: at least one participating AG publicly attached threatened legal consequences to the demand. The newsletter still supplies no filed case, operative order, meeting, recipient response or completed company change. It is not evidence that every co-signatory adopted that later characterization. Its statements about search behavior and prevalence are advocacy claims, not independently tested results in this run.\n\n## What this joins, and what it does not\n\nThe supported mechanism is coordinated public-office pressure directed at company counsel, seeking decisions under private network rules. This offers a concrete conversion point between government advocacy and commercial exclusion. It does not require proving that an AG owns or controls a payment company. The July Cash App NAAG reimbursement belongs to a different investigation; no allocation or expense record connects that money to this letter campaign.\n\nAt the same time, the presence of company discretion does not establish an unconstrained or wholly voluntary choice. Official threats, existing law, reputational exposure and company policy may interact. We need a recipient's reply, counsel assessment, merchant/acquirer instruction, actual restriction or later enforcement record to determine which interaction occurred here. We have no basis to assign these letters responsibility for Steam removals, a general pornography prohibition, or universal identity requirements. The seller-level scope makes collateral reach a concrete question, but actual overbreadth requires a worked case.\n\n## Reading and custody\n\nRoot read all 15 pages of the NAAG combined-letter web-reader representation in the preceding acquisition phase and all returned text of the Pennsylvania indexed copy in this run. Root reread the retained live Pennsylvania payment body and visually inspected PDF1; the content and 15-page structure match the inspected representations at the substantive clauses, without claiming byte identity across hosts. Root also read the entire retained Pennsylvania announcement main body. Vermont's complete substantive announcement was returned in search; direct reader open returned403, so this packet does not pretend that route succeeded.\n\nThe indexed Pennsylvania /2025/09/ PDF URL returned404 through ordinary GET despite a working indexed reader. Its retained pa-letters.pdf is an error response, explicitly marked false in captures-root.json. The exact PDF href in the successful announcement led to pa-letters-live.pdf, a successful original: 1,397,552 bytes, SHA256 75db0aba797ff32ebf992254f169571c2385611f171fb87b6f055e6e09c88a97. PDF metadata shows a September2 modification, not a proven publication or drafting date. No metadata-based authorship inference is made. Pennsylvania announcement: 122,926 bytes, SHA256 c1780ae668b126d546a9dece7107b5171c7bf666a91a3cafdf09cfaa0ed9b120. The failed path is closed, not repeatedly retried.\n\nIndependent letter review is in independent-letter-review.md; response-search.md records the bounded outcome lane and any secondary follow-up leads. The letter's cited prevalence infographic has not been audited; its percentages are not adopted as this campaign's findings. No outreach, target-service use, paid route, account access or submission occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-letter-mechanism.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search",
        "title": "Response/outcome search: 22 August 2025 NAAG deepfake-NCII letters",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded public-source search closed. This lane did not acquire a company reply, an attributed policy change, meeting record or AG compliance determination tied specifically to the 22 August 2025 letters. That is a scoped result, not evidence that no private reply, meeting or resulting change exists. Parent independently owns acquis",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded public-source search closed. This lane did not acquire a company reply, an attributed policy change, meeting record or AG compliance determination tied specifically to the 22 August 2025 letters. That is a scoped result, not evidence that no private reply, meeting or resulting change exists. Parent independently owns acquisition and reading of the original combined letters and Pennsylvania announcement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"strongest-primary-follow-up\">Strongest primary follow-up</h2>\n<p>Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador&#x27;s 19 September 2025 newsletter returns to the 47-AG letters, restates demands on payment processors and search providers, and presents implementation or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. It links separate search/payment letters. This is documented subsequent public pressure by a signatory. It reports no company reply, agreed commitment, meeting, particular enforcement filing or implemented change. Its assertions about continuing company conduct remain the AG&#x27;s assertions, not an independent audit of platform behavior. The newsletter&#x27;s separately claimed ICAC results are not an outcome of these letters and are not used here.</p>\n<p>[Idaho AG newsletter](http[local research file] complete substantive body read, web lines97-116, especially108-115. Publisher date19September2025. Official web-reader substantive read, followed by one successful ordinary GET of the original newsletter. Exact linked-letter hrefs were extracted from that HTML; linked PDF bytes were not independently compared with parent&#x27;s original.</p>\n<p>California&#x27;s 26 August 2025 announcement describes the letters as seeking information and opening communication with companies. That is an intention to engage, not proof a conversation happened. Read with Idaho&#x27;s later threat framing rather than treating either summary as the exact operative instrument. [California AG announcement](http[local research file] complete substantive announcement body lines157-184 read; relevant paragraphs166-173. This is contemporaneous framing, not a later outcome. Official web-reader only; no original bytes captured.</p>\n<p>A defensible new relation is Idaho AG -&gt; the letter campaign: publicly reiterates demands and warns of legal consequences on19September2025. It is a public warning/advocacy act, not an order, filing, adjudication or observed compliance. No company-response edge should be added from this pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"promising-later-lead-original-still-missing\">Promising later lead, original still missing</h2>\n<p>The San Francisco Chronicle&#x27;s 17 July 2026 report says Chiu&#x27;s July16 Apple/Google notices cite the 47-AG warning as prior notice. This is a reported legal-use connection; the original notices were not acquired, so their wording and proposed legal significance remain unverified here. [Reported later citation](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The official former office home redirects from http[local research file] to http[local research file] with an April24,2026 archived-site boundary. Home and news links were inspected; http[local research file] returned only three web-reader lines. Targeted searches of both official domains did not locate the notices. Stop this route here; the gap is the actual July16 notices, attachments and subsequent response correspondence held by the office and recipients, not proof the reported notices do not exist.</p>\n<p>[TechCrunch&#x27;s separate July report](http[local research file] reports responses to San Francisco&#x27;s action, not a reply to NAAG. No original response acquired.</p>\n<p>Magica&#x27;s derivative summary was inspected solely to look for links to originals; its citation of the earlier warning leads to the Chronicle, not an original notice. Its link list does not independently corroborate that lineage. Scope: date/title and main body77-124 plus source links125-138. [Derivative discovery page](http[local research file] Do not promote its app-count, financial or legal analyses from this search.</p>\n<h2 id=\"false-positive-and-chronology-boundaries\">False-positive and chronology boundaries</h2>\n<p>The 29 August 2025 Payment Expert article repeats the letters&#x27; requests and prior interventions, and contains no company response in its inspected substantive body. Scope: lines165-221. It is secondary reporting, not an official reply or outcome. Its incidental legal summary was not adopted. [Contemporaneous reporting](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Civitai/Pornhub interventions cited as precedents in the letters must stay antecedent examples. This pass did not freshly investigate their events or infer they were caused by the later letters. Steam/adult-game restrictions, separate AI-company letters, xAI actions, vaping and other branches were excluded. Search results about those subjects were discovery noise, not accepted evidence. Company measures or legislative activity that predate22August2025 cannot be counted as responses merely because search returned them; no complete policy-version history was reconstructed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"exact-search-scope\">Exact search scope</h2>\n<p>One focused pass used the following18 query strings, without a recency restriction. Search engine indexing and compound-domain query interpretation limit completeness; these are not exhaustive searches of every company or AG record system.</p>\n<pre><code>&quot;August 22, 2025&quot; &quot;attorneys general&quot; &quot;payment&quot; deepfake response\n&quot;NAAG&quot; &quot;47&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;response&quot;\n&quot;attorneys general&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;August&quot; &quot;2025&quot; Mastercard reply\n&quot;attorneys general&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;August&quot; &quot;2025&quot; Google response\nsite.sfcityattorney.org Apple Google nudify &quot;2026&quot; &quot;August&quot;\nsite.mastercard.com &quot;attorneys general&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot;\nsite.visa.com &quot;attorneys general&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot;\n&quot;August 22, 2025&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;respond&quot;\n&quot;Chiu&quot; &quot;July 17, 2026&quot; &quot;Apple&quot; &quot;cityattorney&quot;\nsite.sfcityattorney.org &quot;nudify&quot;\nsite.sfcityattorney.org &quot;nonconsensual&quot; &quot;Apple&quot;\n&quot;47&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;response&quot; &quot;PayPal&quot;\nsite.sf.gov &quot;Chiu&quot; &quot;Apple&quot; &quot;nudify&quot;\nsite.blog.google &quot;attorneys general&quot; &quot;deepfake&quot;\nsite.naag.org &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;response&quot; &quot;payment&quot;\n&quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;attorneys general&quot; response site:paypal.com OR site:americanexpress.com OR site:apple.com\n&quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;attorneys general&quot; response site:microsoft.com OR site:blogs.bing.com OR site:yahooinc.com\n&quot;August 22&quot; &quot;2025&quot; &quot;NCII&quot; &quot;response&quot;\n</code></pre>\n<p>Company-domain searches did not surface a specific original reply to these letters. They did produce pre-existing material and unrelated hosted content; domain appearance alone was not treated as corporate authorship. Exact-date searches also produced unrelated meanings of NCII. No broad archive enumeration, authenticated access, public-record request, contact, spending or case mutation occurred. Web-reader locators are retrieval-specific; this file is a scoped reading/search note, not a preserved set of website originals.</p>\n<h2 id=\"next-record-that-would-change-the-inference\">Next record that would change the inference</h2>\n<p>For response or compliance: recipient general-counsel replies explicitly identifying these letters, the lead AGs&#x27; correspondence/meeting log and any agreed implementation or escalation document. A dated internal or public policy change must identify this intervention or a matched correspondence chain before causal attribution. Lack of public outcome reporting could reflect private engagement, refusal, incomplete public indexing, no action, or action for other reasons; this search does not select among them. For the narrower reported SF lineage, obtain the actual July16 notices before mapping the 2025 warning into that later legal theory. No subsequent branch is started by this return.</p>\n<h2 id=\"final-idaho-custody-capture\">Final Idaho custody capture</h2>\n<p>At parent request, one ordinary unauthenticated GET succeeded with HTTP200 at2026-09-09T11:40:24.462431+00:00. Retained response-idaho-newsletter.html,62,317bytes, SHA-2564e8a67b3aafe342a0dfd53fa853aae662a4ddda5bdd9b17b32d24ce6cbf78608. response-idaho-capture.json records scope and exact source hrefs. These substantiate where the newsletter directs readers; the linked PDFs were not newly fetched or treated as independent outcomes.</p>\n<p>Search-letter href: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Payment-letter href: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The September upload directory does not independently establish a different letter date. Parent has separately retained the Pennsylvania combined original at its current exact href; this lane makes no byte-identity claim about the separate Idaho PDFs. Acquisition remains closed.</p>",
        "path": "naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09/response-search.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-idaho"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded public-source search closed. This lane did not acquire a company reply, an attributed policy change, meeting record or AG compliance determination tied specifically to the 22 August 2025 letters. That is a scoped result, not evidence that no private reply, meeting or resulting change exists. Parent independently owns acquisition and reading of the original combined letters and Pennsylvania announcement.\n\n## Strongest primary follow-up\n\nIdaho Attorney General Raul Labrador's 19 September 2025 newsletter returns to the 47-AG letters, restates demands on payment processors and search providers, and presents implementation or legal consequences as the choice facing recipients. It links separate search/payment letters. This is documented subsequent public pressure by a signatory. It reports no company reply, agreed commitment, meeting, particular enforcement filing or implemented change. Its assertions about continuing company conduct remain the AG's assertions, not an independent audit of platform behavior. The newsletter's separately claimed ICAC results are not an outcome of these letters and are not used here.\n\nIdaho AG newsletter (see source references) complete substantive body read, web lines97-116, especially108-115. Publisher date19September2025. Official web-reader substantive read, followed by one successful ordinary GET of the original newsletter. Exact linked-letter hrefs were extracted from that HTML; linked PDF bytes were not independently compared with parent's original.\n\nCalifornia's 26 August 2025 announcement describes the letters as seeking information and opening communication with companies. That is an intention to engage, not proof a conversation happened. Read with Idaho's later threat framing rather than treating either summary as the exact operative instrument. California AG announcement (see source references) complete substantive announcement body lines157-184 read; relevant paragraphs166-173. This is contemporaneous framing, not a later outcome. Official web-reader only; no original bytes captured.\n\nA defensible new relation is Idaho AG -> the letter campaign: publicly reiterates demands and warns of legal consequences on19September2025. It is a public warning/advocacy act, not an order, filing, adjudication or observed compliance. No company-response edge should be added from this pass.\n\n## Promising later lead, original still missing\n\nThe San Francisco Chronicle's 17 July 2026 report says Chiu's July16 Apple/Google notices cite the 47-AG warning as prior notice. This is a reported legal-use connection; the original notices were not acquired, so their wording and proposed legal significance remain unverified here. Reported later citation (see source references)\n\nThe official former office home redirects from http[local research file] to http[local research file] with an April24,2026 archived-site boundary. Home and news links were inspected; http[local research file] returned only three web-reader lines. Targeted searches of both official domains did not locate the notices. Stop this route here; the gap is the actual July16 notices, attachments and subsequent response correspondence held by the office and recipients, not proof the reported notices do not exist.\n\nTechCrunch's separate July report (see source references) reports responses to San Francisco's action, not a reply to NAAG. No original response acquired.\n\nMagica's derivative summary was inspected solely to look for links to originals; its citation of the earlier warning leads to the Chronicle, not an original notice. Its link list does not independently corroborate that lineage. Scope: date/title and main body77-124 plus source links125-138. Derivative discovery page (see source references) Do not promote its app-count, financial or legal analyses from this search.\n\n## False-positive and chronology boundaries\n\nThe 29 August 2025 Payment Expert article repeats the letters' requests and prior interventions, and contains no company response in its inspected substantive body. Scope: lines165-221. It is secondary reporting, not an official reply or outcome. Its incidental legal summary was not adopted. Contemporaneous reporting (see source references)\n\nCivitai/Pornhub interventions cited as precedents in the letters must stay antecedent examples. This pass did not freshly investigate their events or infer they were caused by the later letters. Steam/adult-game restrictions, separate AI-company letters, xAI actions, vaping and other branches were excluded. Search results about those subjects were discovery noise, not accepted evidence. Company measures or legislative activity that predate22August2025 cannot be counted as responses merely because search returned them; no complete policy-version history was reconstructed.\n\n## Exact search scope\n\nOne focused pass used the following18 query strings, without a recency restriction. Search engine indexing and compound-domain query interpretation limit completeness; these are not exhaustive searches of every company or AG record system.\n\n```\n\"August 22, 2025\" \"attorneys general\" \"payment\" deepfake response\n\"NAAG\" \"47\" \"deepfake\" \"response\"\n\"attorneys general\" \"deepfake\" \"August\" \"2025\" Mastercard reply\n\"attorneys general\" \"deepfake\" \"August\" \"2025\" Google response\nsite.sfcityattorney.org Apple Google nudify \"2026\" \"August\"\nsite.mastercard.com \"attorneys general\" \"deepfake\"\nsite.visa.com \"attorneys general\" \"deepfake\"\n\"August 22, 2025\" \"deepfake\" \"respond\"\n\"Chiu\" \"July 17, 2026\" \"Apple\" \"cityattorney\"\nsite.sfcityattorney.org \"nudify\"\nsite.sfcityattorney.org \"nonconsensual\" \"Apple\"\n\"47\" \"deepfake\" \"response\" \"PayPal\"\nsite.sf.gov \"Chiu\" \"Apple\" \"nudify\"\nsite.blog.google \"attorneys general\" \"deepfake\"\nsite.naag.org \"deepfake\" \"response\" \"payment\"\n\"deepfake\" \"attorneys general\" response site:paypal.com OR site:americanexpress.com OR site:apple.com\n\"deepfake\" \"attorneys general\" response site:microsoft.com OR site:blogs.bing.com OR site:yahooinc.com\n\"August 22\" \"2025\" \"NCII\" \"response\"\n```\n\nCompany-domain searches did not surface a specific original reply to these letters. They did produce pre-existing material and unrelated hosted content; domain appearance alone was not treated as corporate authorship. Exact-date searches also produced unrelated meanings of NCII. No broad archive enumeration, authenticated access, public-record request, contact, spending or case mutation occurred. Web-reader locators are retrieval-specific; this file is a scoped reading/search note, not a preserved set of website originals.\n\n## Next record that would change the inference\n\nFor response or compliance: recipient general-counsel replies explicitly identifying these letters, the lead AGs' correspondence/meeting log and any agreed implementation or escalation document. A dated internal or public policy change must identify this intervention or a matched correspondence chain before causal attribution. Lack of public outcome reporting could reflect private engagement, refusal, incomplete public indexing, no action, or action for other reasons; this search does not select among them. For the narrower reported SF lineage, obtain the actual July16 notices before mapping the 2025 warning into that later legal theory. No subsequent branch is started by this return.\n\n## Final Idaho custody capture\n\nAt parent request, one ordinary unauthenticated GET succeeded with HTTP200 at2026-09-09T11:40:24.462431+00:00. Retained response-idaho-newsletter.html,62,317bytes, SHA-2564e8a67b3aafe342a0dfd53fa853aae662a4ddda5bdd9b17b32d24ce6cbf78608. response-idaho-capture.json records scope and exact source hrefs. These substantiate where the newsletter directs readers; the linked PDFs were not newly fetched or treated as independent outcomes.\n\nSearch-letter href: http[local research file]\n\nPayment-letter href: http[local research file]\n\nThe September upload directory does not independently establish a different letter date. Parent has separately retained the Pennsylvania combined original at its current exact href; this lane makes no byte-identity claim about the separate Idaho PDFs. Acquisition remains closed.\n",
        "file": "research/naag-payment-letter-wave-2026-09-09-response-search.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance",
        "title": "NAAG settlement resources: bounded finance return",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition is closed at the fund-instrument and legal-identity boundary. This packet does not establish receipt of the Cash App reimbursement, a fund allocation of it, or motive for selecting an enforcement target.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition is closed at the fund-instrument and legal-identity boundary. This packet does not establish receipt of the Cash App reimbursement, a fund allocation of it, or motive for selecting an enforcement target.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>Published NAAG fund instruments document a real mechanism through which earlier settlements finance later investigation capacity. They authorize segregated funds, grants from principal, paid experts and other costs, conditional replenishment after successful litigation, and NAAG administration fees. They also specify applications, receipts and reporting records that should exist. Their dates and committee structures matter: the 2012 and 2016 rules cannot simply be assigned to the seven-person consolidated fund committee currently described in the separately acquired governance packet without an amendment or delegation record.</p>\n<p>The July 2026 Cash App instrument separately provides $264,153.73 to NAAG as investigation-cost reimbursement within the $45 million state allocation (Oregon stipulation, paragraph 48, PDF15-16; retained in the prior July packet). That is an obligation in the acquired instrument, not a payment receipt. No record in this run assigns that amount to either fund below. It could reimburse already-incurred coordination costs without becoming a new investigation grant.</p>\n<h2 id=\"vw-settlement-fund-2016-rules-five-pages\">VW Settlement Fund: 2016 rules, five pages</h2>\n<p>Original URL: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The entire five-page official web-reader rendition was read, including Attachment 1. Ordinary unauthenticated GET returned 403 once; the retained error response is not the PDF. The accessible text and this scoped reading note are derivative evidence. The URL upload directory is 2020; section I dates Executive Committee approval to 2016.</p>\n<p>Section A, PDF1, recites a June 2016 partial settlement providing approximately $631 million to participating states and $20 million to NAAG for consumer-protection oversight, training and enforcement, including automobile fraud, and investigation-cost reimbursement. These are the rule&#x27;s description of settlement provisions, not newly acquired cash receipts.</p>\n<p>Sections B-C, PDF1-2, vest administration in a three-AG special committee: NAAG&#x27;s president appoints from the Executive Committee, which approves appointments. At most two may share a political party. Two affirmative votes approve grants, including principal; decisions are final without appeal. Money must be in a new segregated account, not commingled; additional deposits must lawfully fit the purpose. NAAG invests under the special committee&#x27;s approved policy. If the special committee determines the fund purpose no longer exists, the Executive Committee may dissolve it and direct remaining money to NAAG&#x27;s General Fund. This is a conditional authority, not an observed transfer.</p>\n<p>Section D, PDF3, requires recipients, to the extent applicable and permitted by law, to promise repayment when funded litigation succeeds, limited by available recovery. Conferences, education, training and travel-related events are exempt. Accounting is due by June 30 following disbursement. These are not uniformly repayable loans. Section E requires a temporary replacement when a special-committee member&#x27;s office applies; implementation of that recusal was not inspected.</p>\n<p>Section F, PDF3, authorizes NAAG a fee of 1.0% of total fund value at inception and annually thereafter, covering administration and third-party costs. The current fee amount and any Cash App linkage are unknown. Section H, PDF4, includes the fund within NAAG&#x27;s annual audit procedures; no resulting audit was acquired.</p>\n<p>Section B treats fund statements as public records and calls for balances, applications, deposits and withdrawals to be supplied at the annual summer meeting or on a NAAG member&#x27;s request. Attachment 1, PDF5, requires written applications signed by an AG or, for NAAG itself, its executive director. Applications identify the purpose, action, amount and payee; payments may be directed to vendors, AG offices, NAAG or a designated multistate office. Bills and receipts go to NAAG finance for disbursement. The text does not establish an unrestricted public inspection procedure for confidential applications.</p>\n<h2 id=\"financial-services-fund-mou-effective-31-october-2012-seven-pages\">Financial Services Fund: MOU effective 31 October 2012, seven pages</h2>\n<p>Original URL: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The entire official seven-page web-reader rendition, including appendices, was read. One ordinary GET returned 403; no original PDF bytes were retained. This is the Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund.</p>\n<p>PDF1 describes all five 4 April 2012 consent judgments against Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Ally/GMAC as containing an Exhibit B provision directing $15 million to NAAG for the fund. Do not silently describe that as the aggregate fund, or reconstruct $75 million received: the underlying five judgments and aggregate receipts were not acquired. The MOU describes the State Monitoring Committee&#x27;s development of the rules; that body is distinct from the grant special committee.</p>\n<p>Sections A-B, PDF2, authorize investigation/prosecution expenses, experts, consultants, information exchange and education concerning fraud and illegal or deceptive financial/consumer practices. A five-AG special committee is appointed by the NAAG president and approved by its Executive Committee, with one-year terms and at most three from one party. Grants of $5,000 or more require three votes; smaller grants require two votes from different parties. Principal can be spent, and decisions are final without appeal. Public fund statements and member-request reporting are specified.</p>\n<p>Sections C-D, PDF3, establish segregated purpose-limited money and committee-approved investment policy, conditional litigation-success repayment, June 30 accounting, and the education/travel exceptions. This MOU does not contain the VW instrument&#x27;s dissolution-to-General-Fund clause; that authority must not be transplanted. Sections E-H, PDF4, prescribe temporary replacement of an applicant committee member, annual audit inclusion, and a 1.0% administration fee on total fund value at NAAG&#x27;s fiscal-year close. Attachment 2, PDF7, identifies written application and NAAG finance bills/receipts as records of approval and expenditure. Neither present balances nor applied fees were acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"identity-and-accounting-boundary\">Identity and accounting boundary</h2>\n<p>The official GAO report GAO-26-107956, published 18 June 2026, reports that NAAG was not required to file Form 990 in the August 2025 IRS exempt-organization data it examined. It groups NAAG with organizations coded as governmental units for this filing analysis. This does not establish a broader legal conclusion that NAAG is a government department, nor transfer NAIC&#x27;s detailed IRS history or financial transparency to NAAG. Scoped read: report date; section on filing requirements of similar organizations; footnotes 41-42. Original HTML retained: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>An IRS-hosted original 2024 return separately identifies National Association of Attorneys General Mission Foundation Inc, EIN 30-0088843. PDF1 states a calendar 2024 period, 501(c)(3) status and education/research/training purpose benefiting NAAG members. Its return signature date is 14 November 2025, not an independently established public-release date. Schedule A, PDF16, identifies a Type I supporting organization, sole supported organization NAAG, EIN 52-1322260, with monetary support of $0 and other support of $5,192,939. These are the Foundation&#x27;s reported support categories; other support is not a cash payment and neither figure is an association-wide budget. Schedule R, PDF44, also lists NAAG as a related exempt organization. The form&#x27;s tax categories should not be repurposed as a complete operational-control map.</p>\n<p>Original: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Forty-eight original pages retained; visual substantive reads were PDF1,13-16,44,47-48 only. PDF47-48 were blank schedule fields; PDF13-15 described training, Supreme Court advocacy and member services. The original is image-only for the attempted text extractor; the empty derived text is not evidence of a read. Other rendered pages were not substantively inspected. No Cash App item was sought by pretending those unread pages were searched successfully.</p>\n<h2 id=\"negative-frontier-and-next-discriminating-record\">Negative frontier and next discriminating record</h2>\n<p>No NAAG association audited financial statement, current segregated fund balance, annual fund statement, Cash App remittance advice, deposit ledger or cost invoice was acquired. The two official PDF byte routes each stopped after one 403, using the readable official web rendition as the credible substitute. The IRS original succeeded by ordinary public GET after web-parser failures. No private/account or paid route was used. Failure to locate a Form 990 is not suspicious by itself given GAO&#x27;s filing analysis. Membership dues, settlement reimbursements and restricted grants must remain separate, and a Foundation return cannot substitute for association accounts.</p>\n<p>The useful next records are the current consolidated fund committee charter/amendments; latest fund-specific statements and audit notes; and, for Cash App, remittance plus NAAG finance&#x27;s underlying invoices, coding and allocation. These would distinguish reimbursement of past expenses, retention in general operating resources, and an authorized restricted-fund deposit. A fund application, committee approval and disbursement record would be needed to name a later investigation actually financed. The instruments establish the mechanism, not that any particular later case was purchased or directed by an earlier defendant.</p>",
        "path": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09/finance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-vw-rules",
          "w24-ag-s-fsf-rules",
          "w24-ag-s-gao",
          "w24-ag-s-foundation-return"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition is closed at the fund-instrument and legal-identity boundary. This packet does not establish receipt of the Cash App reimbursement, a fund allocation of it, or motive for selecting an enforcement target.\n\n## Finding\n\nPublished NAAG fund instruments document a real mechanism through which earlier settlements finance later investigation capacity. They authorize segregated funds, grants from principal, paid experts and other costs, conditional replenishment after successful litigation, and NAAG administration fees. They also specify applications, receipts and reporting records that should exist. Their dates and committee structures matter: the 2012 and 2016 rules cannot simply be assigned to the seven-person consolidated fund committee currently described in the separately acquired governance packet without an amendment or delegation record.\n\nThe July 2026 Cash App instrument separately provides $264,153.73 to NAAG as investigation-cost reimbursement within the $45 million state allocation (Oregon stipulation, paragraph 48, PDF15-16; retained in the prior July packet). That is an obligation in the acquired instrument, not a payment receipt. No record in this run assigns that amount to either fund below. It could reimburse already-incurred coordination costs without becoming a new investigation grant.\n\n## VW Settlement Fund: 2016 rules, five pages\n\nOriginal URL: http[local research file]\n\nThe entire five-page official web-reader rendition was read, including Attachment 1. Ordinary unauthenticated GET returned 403 once; the retained error response is not the PDF. The accessible text and this scoped reading note are derivative evidence. The URL upload directory is 2020; section I dates Executive Committee approval to 2016.\n\nSection A, PDF1, recites a June 2016 partial settlement providing approximately $631 million to participating states and $20 million to NAAG for consumer-protection oversight, training and enforcement, including automobile fraud, and investigation-cost reimbursement. These are the rule's description of settlement provisions, not newly acquired cash receipts.\n\nSections B-C, PDF1-2, vest administration in a three-AG special committee: NAAG's president appoints from the Executive Committee, which approves appointments. At most two may share a political party. Two affirmative votes approve grants, including principal; decisions are final without appeal. Money must be in a new segregated account, not commingled; additional deposits must lawfully fit the purpose. NAAG invests under the special committee's approved policy. If the special committee determines the fund purpose no longer exists, the Executive Committee may dissolve it and direct remaining money to NAAG's General Fund. This is a conditional authority, not an observed transfer.\n\nSection D, PDF3, requires recipients, to the extent applicable and permitted by law, to promise repayment when funded litigation succeeds, limited by available recovery. Conferences, education, training and travel-related events are exempt. Accounting is due by June 30 following disbursement. These are not uniformly repayable loans. Section E requires a temporary replacement when a special-committee member's office applies; implementation of that recusal was not inspected.\n\nSection F, PDF3, authorizes NAAG a fee of 1.0% of total fund value at inception and annually thereafter, covering administration and third-party costs. The current fee amount and any Cash App linkage are unknown. Section H, PDF4, includes the fund within NAAG's annual audit procedures; no resulting audit was acquired.\n\nSection B treats fund statements as public records and calls for balances, applications, deposits and withdrawals to be supplied at the annual summer meeting or on a NAAG member's request. Attachment 1, PDF5, requires written applications signed by an AG or, for NAAG itself, its executive director. Applications identify the purpose, action, amount and payee; payments may be directed to vendors, AG offices, NAAG or a designated multistate office. Bills and receipts go to NAAG finance for disbursement. The text does not establish an unrestricted public inspection procedure for confidential applications.\n\n## Financial Services Fund: MOU effective 31 October 2012, seven pages\n\nOriginal URL: http[local research file]\n\nThe entire official seven-page web-reader rendition, including appendices, was read. One ordinary GET returned 403; no original PDF bytes were retained. This is the Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund.\n\nPDF1 describes all five 4 April 2012 consent judgments against Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Ally/GMAC as containing an Exhibit B provision directing $15 million to NAAG for the fund. Do not silently describe that as the aggregate fund, or reconstruct $75 million received: the underlying five judgments and aggregate receipts were not acquired. The MOU describes the State Monitoring Committee's development of the rules; that body is distinct from the grant special committee.\n\nSections A-B, PDF2, authorize investigation/prosecution expenses, experts, consultants, information exchange and education concerning fraud and illegal or deceptive financial/consumer practices. A five-AG special committee is appointed by the NAAG president and approved by its Executive Committee, with one-year terms and at most three from one party. Grants of $5,000 or more require three votes; smaller grants require two votes from different parties. Principal can be spent, and decisions are final without appeal. Public fund statements and member-request reporting are specified.\n\nSections C-D, PDF3, establish segregated purpose-limited money and committee-approved investment policy, conditional litigation-success repayment, June 30 accounting, and the education/travel exceptions. This MOU does not contain the VW instrument's dissolution-to-General-Fund clause; that authority must not be transplanted. Sections E-H, PDF4, prescribe temporary replacement of an applicant committee member, annual audit inclusion, and a 1.0% administration fee on total fund value at NAAG's fiscal-year close. Attachment 2, PDF7, identifies written application and NAAG finance bills/receipts as records of approval and expenditure. Neither present balances nor applied fees were acquired.\n\n## Identity and accounting boundary\n\nThe official GAO report GAO-26-107956, published 18 June 2026, reports that NAAG was not required to file Form 990 in the August 2025 IRS exempt-organization data it examined. It groups NAAG with organizations coded as governmental units for this filing analysis. This does not establish a broader legal conclusion that NAAG is a government department, nor transfer NAIC's detailed IRS history or financial transparency to NAAG. Scoped read: report date; section on filing requirements of similar organizations; footnotes 41-42. Original HTML retained: http[local research file]\n\nAn IRS-hosted original 2024 return separately identifies National Association of Attorneys General Mission Foundation Inc, EIN 30-0088843. PDF1 states a calendar 2024 period, 501(c)(3) status and education/research/training purpose benefiting NAAG members. Its return signature date is 14 November 2025, not an independently established public-release date. Schedule A, PDF16, identifies a Type I supporting organization, sole supported organization NAAG, EIN 52-1322260, with monetary support of $0 and other support of $5,192,939. These are the Foundation's reported support categories; other support is not a cash payment and neither figure is an association-wide budget. Schedule R, PDF44, also lists NAAG as a related exempt organization. The form's tax categories should not be repurposed as a complete operational-control map.\n\nOriginal: http[local research file]\n\nForty-eight original pages retained; visual substantive reads were PDF1,13-16,44,47-48 only. PDF47-48 were blank schedule fields; PDF13-15 described training, Supreme Court advocacy and member services. The original is image-only for the attempted text extractor; the empty derived text is not evidence of a read. Other rendered pages were not substantively inspected. No Cash App item was sought by pretending those unread pages were searched successfully.\n\n## Negative frontier and next discriminating record\n\nNo NAAG association audited financial statement, current segregated fund balance, annual fund statement, Cash App remittance advice, deposit ledger or cost invoice was acquired. The two official PDF byte routes each stopped after one 403, using the readable official web rendition as the credible substitute. The IRS original succeeded by ordinary public GET after web-parser failures. No private/account or paid route was used. Failure to locate a Form 990 is not suspicious by itself given GAO's filing analysis. Membership dues, settlement reimbursements and restricted grants must remain separate, and a Foundation return cannot substitute for association accounts.\n\nThe useful next records are the current consolidated fund committee charter/amendments; latest fund-specific statements and audit notes; and, for Cash App, remittance plus NAAG finance's underlying invoices, coding and allocation. These would distinguish reimbursement of past expenses, retention in general operating resources, and an authorized restricted-fund deposit. A fund application, committee approval and disbursement record would be needed to name a later investigation actually financed. The instruments establish the mechanism, not that any particular later case was purchased or directed by an earlier defendant.\n",
        "file": "research/naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-finance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance",
        "title": "NAAG: who organizes, approves and supplies collective capacity",
        "description": "Observed9September2026. This root lane is closed at a public governance/procedure breakpoint. It follows the specific NAAG investigation-cost reimbursement in the July Cash App settlement. It does not establish that NAAG received that payment, supplied a particular investigator, or chose the Cash App target. Separate finance.md examines formal fund instrumen",
        "html": "<p>Observed9September2026. This root lane is closed at a public governance/procedure breakpoint. It follows the specific NAAG investigation-cost reimbursement in the July Cash App settlement. It does not establish that NAAG received that payment, supplied a particular investigator, or chose the Cash App target. Separate finance.md examines formal fund instruments and financial identity. Current web descriptions are organization accounts; the May2026 policy procedure is a published operational rule, not proof of every historical use.</p>\n<h2 id=\"different-bodies-different-rights\">Different bodies, different rights</h2>\n<p>The [leadership page](http[local research file] describes a13-attorney-general Executive Committee governing NAAG&#x27;s funds, property and management. It comprises four officers, the Finance Committee chair, and eight appointees split between president and president-elect. The committee employs an executive director for day-to-day operations; finance and audit committees have distinct oversight functions. Current named president is William Tong; president-elect Marty Jackley; vice-president Brian Schwalb; immediate past president John Formella. Tim Griffin is Finance chair. This is a dated page observation, not a claim these people held every role when older settlements were negotiated. Dan Schweitzer is listed as interim executive director and Theresia Heller as CFO.</p>\n<p>The [Consolidated Consumer Protection and Charity Funds Committee](http[local research file] has a separate remit: funds for consumer-protection/charity enforcement and training. The current roster names co-chairs Phil Weiser and Derek Brown, with Keith Ellison, Letitia James, Gentner Drummond, Dave Sunday and Jonathan Skrmetti. Kate Donoven, Center for Consumer Protection director, is the staff contact. This short page identifies oversight and membership but supplies neither a specific Cash App grant nor a grant-approval threshold; the formal fund documents must carry those claims.</p>\n<p>Neither body is the July Cash App agreement&#x27;s eight-state Multistate AG Executive Committee. Nor is either the January money-transmitter order&#x27;s five-state executive group. An official may sit in more than one, but the grant, corporate-governance, enforcement and fallback-plan approval rights attach to different instruments. NAAG is a specified reimbursement payee in Oregon48; the Oregon money-award table identifies the state as judgment creditor. NAAG is not a signatory to that inspected stipulation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"resource-provision-is-explicit-allocation-still-needs-its-own-record\">Resource provision is explicit, allocation still needs its own record</h2>\n<p>NAAG&#x27;s <a>member-services page</a>.</p>\n<p>The [FAQ](http[local research file] identifies member service fees, registrations and investment proceeds originating in past settlements as operating sources. It says stewarded funds are held apart from operating accounts, constrained by settlement and executive-committee restrictions, and that nearly97% cannot fund NAAG operations. That percentage is an undated organizational claim observed today, with no audited denominator or annual-spending calculation acquired in this root lane. The FAQ says fund committees decide by majority. It also says NAAG does not accept corporate/lobbyist donations, memberships or sponsorships; that is a stated policy, not a transaction-by-transaction audit. Public-conference attendance and registration are separately described.</p>\n<p>The same FAQ says NAAG is not a federal agency, the USAG is not a member, and NAAG is not itself a party to lawsuits or settlements. A designated reimbursement recipient can be distinct from the parties, as in the Cash App document. Its McKinsey example describes15million dollars for administration, including7million reimbursing the Financial Services Fund, roughly215,000 reimbursing documented investigation expenses, and the remainder for a public documents repository. This is an organization-reported example of resources being replenished and used; the underlying settlement and receipts were not read in this lane. It is not proof of an equivalent Cash App allocation, nor a reason to open the opioid branch now.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-policy-letter-machinery-leaves-identifiable-records\">The policy-letter machinery leaves identifiable records</h2>\n<p>The [May2026 Policy Letter Process](http[local research file] both pages read, specifies a concrete route. AG offices submit a draft and an accompanying colleague letter, backed by at least two Democratic and two Republican AGs. Sponsors set a deadline at least10businessdays ahead and supply lead-contact details. NAAG compiles and circulates the packet; it assists with formatting on request. The published process does not identify who originally authored a given draft or whether outside input preceded the sponsors&#x27; request.</p>\n<p>Once circulated, any change requires a new circulation and voids the prior signatures. AGs or designated staff use an authenticated sign-on site to confirm or reject for their jurisdiction, recording name, email and title for an audit trail. At36signatory states, the letter receives NAAG letterhead; NAAG coordinates press releases with signatories and transmits it. Below36, it is returned with sponsoring-state seals and the acquired signatures for the states to disseminate, and NAAG&#x27;s role ends. The threshold governs the association&#x27;s endorsed distribution, not a state&#x27;s ability to speak or a court&#x27;s authority. Retained signature images are used only for initiatives a jurisdiction joins under this process; possession of an image does not establish blanket consent.</p>\n<p>This gives the investigation specific expected records: initiating office request, colleague letter, circulated draft/version, named lead contacts, circulation date and deadline, jurisdictional confirmation/rejection log, revised-circulation record if text changed, and final transmission/press coordination. These are much more discriminating than a shared logo. The process does not prove every record survives or is publicly releasable, nor that every historical coalition letter used theMay2026version. No authenticated site, staff account or correspondence was accessed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discovery-boundaries-and-next-discriminator\">Discovery boundaries and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>The [committee directory](http[local research file] lists AI/internet safety, youth safety and gaming bodies, alongside other topics; their titles are discovery cues only. The [policy index](http[local research file] lists AI preemption, KOSA and KIDS Act letters, potentially relevant to earlier campaign branches. Several listing descriptions visibly repeat a deepfake-payment-platform summary under unrelated titles. The actual letters must be read before deriving demands or recipient connections from those cards. This root run did not open them.</p>\n<p>The best-supported mechanism is a member-governed resource and coordination institution, with several decision gates: funds are supervised through defined bodies, expertise and communications are supplied to members, and policy endorsement has a documented sponsorship/sign-off route. Ordinary cooperation and a consequential concentration of capacity can both be true. Whether settlement replenishment changes case selection or policy priorities remains a different question requiring a grant application, decision, expense schedule or worked correspondence chain. No inference of unlawful or hidden control follows merely from funding capacity.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-limitations\">Source custody and limitations</h2>\n<p>Eight NAAG primary pages/documents were read through the working public web reader. reader-sources-governance.json records exact scopes and references. OrdinaryGET attempts returned403 for those eight plus the CCP-work link whose web reader gave a cache miss; the saved HTMLs are error responses only, not originals. Those original-download routes are closed. The policy PDF&#x27;s complete web-reader output is retained in naag-policy-procedure-web-reader.json, a derived reader representation rather than originalPDFbytes. Its first save hit a PowerShell smart-apostrophe parser issue; one byte-encoded save succeeded, with no change to source content or permission boundary. Full bylaws were not located in the limited search; unrelated organizations&#x27; results were discarded.</p>\n<p>Root did not enter an account, submit a form, contact staff, pay for records, or edit an earlier case/ZIP. Acquisition has stopped while the separate finance lane completes, before a combined forest review selects another research run.</p>",
        "path": "naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09/governance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w24-ag-s-faq",
          "w24-ag-s-consolidated",
          "w24-ag-s-leadership",
          "w24-ag-s-procedure",
          "w24-ag-s-services",
          "w24-ag-s-ccp"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed9September2026. This root lane is closed at a public governance/procedure breakpoint. It follows the specific NAAG investigation-cost reimbursement in the July Cash App settlement. It does not establish that NAAG received that payment, supplied a particular investigator, or chose the Cash App target. Separate finance.md examines formal fund instruments and financial identity. Current web descriptions are organization accounts; the May2026 policy procedure is a published operational rule, not proof of every historical use.\n\n## Different bodies, different rights\n\nThe leadership page (see source references) describes a13-attorney-general Executive Committee governing NAAG's funds, property and management. It comprises four officers, the Finance Committee chair, and eight appointees split between president and president-elect. The committee employs an executive director for day-to-day operations; finance and audit committees have distinct oversight functions. Current named president is William Tong; president-elect Marty Jackley; vice-president Brian Schwalb; immediate past president John Formella. Tim Griffin is Finance chair. This is a dated page observation, not a claim these people held every role when older settlements were negotiated. Dan Schweitzer is listed as interim executive director and Theresia Heller as CFO.\n\nThe Consolidated Consumer Protection and Charity Funds Committee (see source references) has a separate remit: funds for consumer-protection/charity enforcement and training. The current roster names co-chairs Phil Weiser and Derek Brown, with Keith Ellison, Letitia James, Gentner Drummond, Dave Sunday and Jonathan Skrmetti. Kate Donoven, Center for Consumer Protection director, is the staff contact. This short page identifies oversight and membership but supplies neither a specific Cash App grant nor a grant-approval threshold; the formal fund documents must carry those claims.\n\nNeither body is the July Cash App agreement's eight-state Multistate AG Executive Committee. Nor is either the January money-transmitter order's five-state executive group. An official may sit in more than one, but the grant, corporate-governance, enforcement and fallback-plan approval rights attach to different instruments. NAAG is a specified reimbursement payee in Oregon48; the Oregon money-award table identifies the state as judgment creditor. NAAG is not a signatory to that inspected stipulation.\n\n## Resource provision is explicit, allocation still needs its own record\n\nNAAG's member-services page.\n\nThe FAQ (see source references) identifies member service fees, registrations and investment proceeds originating in past settlements as operating sources. It says stewarded funds are held apart from operating accounts, constrained by settlement and executive-committee restrictions, and that nearly97% cannot fund NAAG operations. That percentage is an undated organizational claim observed today, with no audited denominator or annual-spending calculation acquired in this root lane. The FAQ says fund committees decide by majority. It also says NAAG does not accept corporate/lobbyist donations, memberships or sponsorships; that is a stated policy, not a transaction-by-transaction audit. Public-conference attendance and registration are separately described.\n\nThe same FAQ says NAAG is not a federal agency, the USAG is not a member, and NAAG is not itself a party to lawsuits or settlements. A designated reimbursement recipient can be distinct from the parties, as in the Cash App document. Its McKinsey example describes15million dollars for administration, including7million reimbursing the Financial Services Fund, roughly215,000 reimbursing documented investigation expenses, and the remainder for a public documents repository. This is an organization-reported example of resources being replenished and used; the underlying settlement and receipts were not read in this lane. It is not proof of an equivalent Cash App allocation, nor a reason to open the opioid branch now.\n\n## The policy-letter machinery leaves identifiable records\n\nThe May2026 Policy Letter Process (see source references) both pages read, specifies a concrete route. AG offices submit a draft and an accompanying colleague letter, backed by at least two Democratic and two Republican AGs. Sponsors set a deadline at least10businessdays ahead and supply lead-contact details. NAAG compiles and circulates the packet; it assists with formatting on request. The published process does not identify who originally authored a given draft or whether outside input preceded the sponsors' request.\n\nOnce circulated, any change requires a new circulation and voids the prior signatures. AGs or designated staff use an authenticated sign-on site to confirm or reject for their jurisdiction, recording name, email and title for an audit trail. At36signatory states, the letter receives NAAG letterhead; NAAG coordinates press releases with signatories and transmits it. Below36, it is returned with sponsoring-state seals and the acquired signatures for the states to disseminate, and NAAG's role ends. The threshold governs the association's endorsed distribution, not a state's ability to speak or a court's authority. Retained signature images are used only for initiatives a jurisdiction joins under this process; possession of an image does not establish blanket consent.\n\nThis gives the investigation specific expected records: initiating office request, colleague letter, circulated draft/version, named lead contacts, circulation date and deadline, jurisdictional confirmation/rejection log, revised-circulation record if text changed, and final transmission/press coordination. These are much more discriminating than a shared logo. The process does not prove every record survives or is publicly releasable, nor that every historical coalition letter used theMay2026version. No authenticated site, staff account or correspondence was accessed.\n\n## Discovery boundaries and next discriminator\n\nThe committee directory (see source references) lists AI/internet safety, youth safety and gaming bodies, alongside other topics; their titles are discovery cues only. The policy index (see source references) lists AI preemption, KOSA and KIDS Act letters, potentially relevant to earlier campaign branches. Several listing descriptions visibly repeat a deepfake-payment-platform summary under unrelated titles. The actual letters must be read before deriving demands or recipient connections from those cards. This root run did not open them.\n\nThe best-supported mechanism is a member-governed resource and coordination institution, with several decision gates: funds are supervised through defined bodies, expertise and communications are supplied to members, and policy endorsement has a documented sponsorship/sign-off route. Ordinary cooperation and a consequential concentration of capacity can both be true. Whether settlement replenishment changes case selection or policy priorities remains a different question requiring a grant application, decision, expense schedule or worked correspondence chain. No inference of unlawful or hidden control follows merely from funding capacity.\n\n## Source custody and limitations\n\nEight NAAG primary pages/documents were read through the working public web reader. reader-sources-governance.json records exact scopes and references. OrdinaryGET attempts returned403 for those eight plus the CCP-work link whose web reader gave a cache miss; the saved HTMLs are error responses only, not originals. Those original-download routes are closed. The policy PDF's complete web-reader output is retained in naag-policy-procedure-web-reader.json, a derived reader representation rather than originalPDFbytes. Its first save hit a PowerShell smart-apostrophe parser issue; one byte-encoded save succeeded, with no change to source content or permission boundary. Full bylaws were not located in the limited search; unrelated organizations' results were discarded.\n\nRoot did not enter an account, submit a form, contact staff, pay for records, or edit an earlier case/ZIP. Acquisition has stopped while the separate finance lane completes, before a combined forest review selects another research run.\n",
        "file": "research/naag-resources-wave-2026-09-09-governance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority",
        "title": "DV category authority: a later adoption claim and an upstream correction boundary",
        "description": "9 September 2026. This bounded pass found later, dated company reporting that materially advances the February launch account, and a directly relevant upstream list-maintenance description. It did not acquire an applicable versioned DV instrument specifying override rights, correction deadlines or downstream recipients' duties. Acquisition is closed at that ",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. This bounded pass found later, dated company reporting that materially advances the February launch account, and a directly relevant upstream list-maintenance description. It did not acquire an applicable versioned DV instrument specifying override rights, correction deadlines or downstream recipients&#x27; duties. Acquisition is closed at that distinction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"dated-records-and-their-limits\">Dated records and their limits</h2>\n<p>DV&#x27;s [7 February 2025 response](http[local research file] before the category launch, describes traffic-triggered page classification, optional blocking of unclassified pages, and campaign settings governing placement. It also reports taking additional blocking measures during its review and announces a P2P category under development. This helps distinguish measurement, classification and action, but it is an interested party&#x27;s response to criticism. No underlying disputed test data were inspected, and no image-hosting service was visited. Its general client-settings claim predates the named defaults and does not prove that every customer may disable them. Original-derived26–31; full substantive1–33 read. The displayed date is February7,2025.</p>\n<p>The [24 April 2025 progress release](http[local research file] says both categories <strong>are enabled by default</strong>. DV reports nearly30 platforms had implemented Highly Illicit, which it offers free to all platforms, including nonclients. This is stronger than the February statement of intended defaults or distribution to more than100 partners: it is a dated adoption report, not independently tested uptake. The release also announces an IWF partnership and says DV <strong>will begin incorporating</strong> IWF&#x27;s URL List into Highly Illicit. Planned reciprocal flagging is not a disclosed transaction or completed referral. No executed data agreement, platform identities/configurations or onboarding evidence was acquired. Original-derived75–80; full substantive61–86 read, displayed date62/67; primary reader91–95.</p>\n<p>IWF&#x27;s [8 May 2025 counterpart announcement](http[local research file] confirms the membership/partnership relationship, but still says DV <strong>will integrate</strong> the URL list. It supports the relationship from the counterparty; repeated executive quotations are not independent validation of implementation, and the post is not an executed licence. Original-derived56–81, particularly63–67; primary reader53–68.</p>\n<p>The [IWF 2025 annual-report section on dynamic lists](http[local research file] describes an assessment-based URL list, including locations linking to or advertising identified imagery. IWF says it rechecks daily, removes entries the same day when the content is no longer present, and updates the list twice daily. A separately attributed DV member testimonial describes integration of IWF signals. These are institutional and participant accounts, not observed delivery logs. Most importantly, removing an obsolete input is not proof that DV changes a broader domain category or that an advertiser restores placements. No exact publication date was inspected;2025 is the report period, not an assigned deployment date. Original-derived52–71 and75–82; primary reader63–91, decisive82 and88–91. Hash/NPI/keyword services are outside this lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"authority-remains-split\">Authority remains split</h2>\n<p>The accepted February13 original remains the source for DV&#x27;s description of its NCMEC input, its own site assessment and the large-platform exclusions. Its public NCMEC material is distinct from the later IWF member-access feed. The records describe different origins and access arrangements; neither an equivalent unit of assessment nor a shared schema is assumed. NCMEC data meaning is assigned to the other research lane.</p>\n<p>The accepted current product page and June2024 review statement remain the sources for broad customer choice and an internal publisher-review route. They do not disclose rights applicable to every named2025 category, an override priority hierarchy, review deadlines, all recipients who must receive a correction, whether changed classifications invalidate cached signals, or any obligation to revisit an advertiser&#x27;s prior exclusion. The existing February25 URL-reporting statement concerns qualified advertiser access; it does not supply these rules.</p>\n<p>Consequently, four actions must remain distinct in any integration: IWF updating a URL input; DV revising a category; a platform receiving and applying that revision; and a customer changing placement. The new records support the first as a published maintenance account and provide further reported integration, but do not establish the remaining steps in a worked correction. Conversely, the absence of that instrument here does not establish that DV or recipients ignore updates. An automatic, timely correction path and a separate campaign-level decision are both still plausible.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-search-and-exact-reopening-record\">Finite search and exact reopening record</h2>\n<p>Ten targeted official-site searches are preserved in <code>category-search-scope.json</code>. They sought the named categories with policy, opt-out, override, dispute, review and PDF terms, plus one directly relevant IWF counterpart search. Results returned the existing launch/review material, the two new DV statements and the two new IWF descriptions. Search-only historical page-exception and generic filing snippets were not promoted into current category rights. No version history, category-definition manual, applicable customer terms, correction API/change-log or service-level review instrument was acquired. This is a bounded public-search result, not an exhaustive assertion that such material does not exist.</p>\n<p>Reopen this lane for an actual, dated DV category/default specification or applicable agreement that identifies who may disable or override these categories and how a corrected input/classification reaches recipients; alternatively, a publicly documented correction with recipient acknowledgment and action. A customer configuration or source-data deletion alone would answer only part of that question. No sales contact, account, form, publisher submission, live category lookup, NCMEC dataset, IWF list entry or harmful-content location was accessed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-integration-candidates\">Source custody and integration candidates</h2>\n<p>Four ordinary GETs succeeded. Original hashes, dates, exact scopes and derivative hashes are in <code>category-captures.json</code>. Every saved original was read within the stated scope; neither capture nor search indexing establishes deployment. The baseline four originals were reused from the accepted FilmOn product packet and were not downloaded again.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Retained original</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><code>category-adalytics-response2025.html</code></td>\n<td><code>d243a7439049bcfa7f8ce3611bdb12d4276187bd0c72d77bd5b1acd8943c9ba9</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>category-iwf-progress2025.html</code></td>\n<td><code>c9ea0b9f1d8c6a2253382cb3cf037d95a94634e5326561b85690c02cc9765c83</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>category-iwf-partnership2025.html</code></td>\n<td><code>64763eefe3e058b885e105dd3d9a9c538c4450a7f6c26bb9a735bdfdd3f178d2</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>category-iwf-dynamic2025.html</code></td>\n<td><code>6a98771131af9c350f6f7a2cab2c0d868d9331a8193ac89758e125b6c6fad869</code></td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Useful directional additions would be DV → category-default/adoption report, IWF ↔ DV membership/planned feed integration, and IWF → URL-list maintenance account. Each requires its reported/planned date and source attribution. Do not create an NCMEC endorsement, FBI instruction, named platform-implementation, mandatory category override or restored-income edge from these records. No case or presentation was edited.</p>",
        "path": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09/category-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-dv-progress",
          "w30-class-s-dv-response",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-partnership",
          "w30-class-s-iwf-dynamic"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. This bounded pass found later, dated company reporting that materially advances the February launch account, and a directly relevant upstream list-maintenance description. It did not acquire an applicable versioned DV instrument specifying override rights, correction deadlines or downstream recipients' duties. Acquisition is closed at that distinction.\n\n## Dated records and their limits\n\nDV's 7 February 2025 response (see source references) before the category launch, describes traffic-triggered page classification, optional blocking of unclassified pages, and campaign settings governing placement. It also reports taking additional blocking measures during its review and announces a P2P category under development. This helps distinguish measurement, classification and action, but it is an interested party's response to criticism. No underlying disputed test data were inspected, and no image-hosting service was visited. Its general client-settings claim predates the named defaults and does not prove that every customer may disable them. Original-derived26–31; full substantive1–33 read. The displayed date is February7,2025.\n\nThe 24 April 2025 progress release (see source references) says both categories **are enabled by default**. DV reports nearly30 platforms had implemented Highly Illicit, which it offers free to all platforms, including nonclients. This is stronger than the February statement of intended defaults or distribution to more than100 partners: it is a dated adoption report, not independently tested uptake. The release also announces an IWF partnership and says DV **will begin incorporating** IWF's URL List into Highly Illicit. Planned reciprocal flagging is not a disclosed transaction or completed referral. No executed data agreement, platform identities/configurations or onboarding evidence was acquired. Original-derived75–80; full substantive61–86 read, displayed date62/67; primary reader91–95.\n\nIWF's 8 May 2025 counterpart announcement (see source references) confirms the membership/partnership relationship, but still says DV **will integrate** the URL list. It supports the relationship from the counterparty; repeated executive quotations are not independent validation of implementation, and the post is not an executed licence. Original-derived56–81, particularly63–67; primary reader53–68.\n\nThe IWF 2025 annual-report section on dynamic lists (see source references) describes an assessment-based URL list, including locations linking to or advertising identified imagery. IWF says it rechecks daily, removes entries the same day when the content is no longer present, and updates the list twice daily. A separately attributed DV member testimonial describes integration of IWF signals. These are institutional and participant accounts, not observed delivery logs. Most importantly, removing an obsolete input is not proof that DV changes a broader domain category or that an advertiser restores placements. No exact publication date was inspected;2025 is the report period, not an assigned deployment date. Original-derived52–71 and75–82; primary reader63–91, decisive82 and88–91. Hash/NPI/keyword services are outside this lane.\n\n## Authority remains split\n\nThe accepted February13 original remains the source for DV's description of its NCMEC input, its own site assessment and the large-platform exclusions. Its public NCMEC material is distinct from the later IWF member-access feed. The records describe different origins and access arrangements; neither an equivalent unit of assessment nor a shared schema is assumed. NCMEC data meaning is assigned to the other research lane.\n\nThe accepted current product page and June2024 review statement remain the sources for broad customer choice and an internal publisher-review route. They do not disclose rights applicable to every named2025 category, an override priority hierarchy, review deadlines, all recipients who must receive a correction, whether changed classifications invalidate cached signals, or any obligation to revisit an advertiser's prior exclusion. The existing February25 URL-reporting statement concerns qualified advertiser access; it does not supply these rules.\n\nConsequently, four actions must remain distinct in any integration: IWF updating a URL input; DV revising a category; a platform receiving and applying that revision; and a customer changing placement. The new records support the first as a published maintenance account and provide further reported integration, but do not establish the remaining steps in a worked correction. Conversely, the absence of that instrument here does not establish that DV or recipients ignore updates. An automatic, timely correction path and a separate campaign-level decision are both still plausible.\n\n## Finite search and exact reopening record\n\nTen targeted official-site searches are preserved in `category-search-scope.json`. They sought the named categories with policy, opt-out, override, dispute, review and PDF terms, plus one directly relevant IWF counterpart search. Results returned the existing launch/review material, the two new DV statements and the two new IWF descriptions. Search-only historical page-exception and generic filing snippets were not promoted into current category rights. No version history, category-definition manual, applicable customer terms, correction API/change-log or service-level review instrument was acquired. This is a bounded public-search result, not an exhaustive assertion that such material does not exist.\n\nReopen this lane for an actual, dated DV category/default specification or applicable agreement that identifies who may disable or override these categories and how a corrected input/classification reaches recipients; alternatively, a publicly documented correction with recipient acknowledgment and action. A customer configuration or source-data deletion alone would answer only part of that question. No sales contact, account, form, publisher submission, live category lookup, NCMEC dataset, IWF list entry or harmful-content location was accessed.\n\n## Source custody and integration candidates\n\nFour ordinary GETs succeeded. Original hashes, dates, exact scopes and derivative hashes are in `category-captures.json`. Every saved original was read within the stated scope; neither capture nor search indexing establishes deployment. The baseline four originals were reused from the accepted FilmOn product packet and were not downloaded again.\n\n| Retained original | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- |\n| `category-adalytics-response2025.html` | `d243a7439049bcfa7f8ce3611bdb12d4276187bd0c72d77bd5b1acd8943c9ba9` |\n| `category-iwf-progress2025.html` | `c9ea0b9f1d8c6a2253382cb3cf037d95a94634e5326561b85690c02cc9765c83` |\n| `category-iwf-partnership2025.html` | `64763eefe3e058b885e105dd3d9a9c538c4450a7f6c26bb9a735bdfdd3f178d2` |\n| `category-iwf-dynamic2025.html` | `6a98771131af9c350f6f7a2cab2c0d868d9331a8193ac89758e125b6c6fad869` |\n\nUseful directional additions would be DV → category-default/adoption report, IWF ↔ DV membership/planned feed integration, and IWF → URL-list maintenance account. Each requires its reported/planned date and source attribution. Do not create an NCMEC endorsement, FBI instruction, named platform-implementation, mandatory category override or restored-income edge from these records. No case or presentation was edited.\n",
        "file": "research/ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning",
        "title": "NCMEC public tables: input meaning before an advertising exclusion",
        "description": "Acquisition closed on9 September2026. The historical source family is identified; DoubleVerify's exact three years, files, filters and provider-to-domain mapping remain unestablished.",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed on9 September2026. The historical source family is identified; DoubleVerify&#x27;s exact three years, files, filters and provider-to-domain mapping remain unestablished.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-doubleverify-actually-said\">What DoubleVerify actually said</h2>\n<p>The retained13 February2025 <a href=\"https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">DoubleVerify announcement</a> says it reviewed three years of public NCMEC data as a starting point, analyzed over300 domains/electronic service providers that had received CSAM-related notices, cross-referenced existing classifications, and conducted site-by-site analysis for the remainder while excluding large, well-moderated social/search services. It does not identify those years or the files and columns used.</p>\n<p>Those qualifications matter. This investigation has not established that DV equated every NCMEC row with illegal content, nor that it confined its inputs to the CSAM column. Its own claimed additional analysis is part of the transformation to be tested. NCMEC&#x27;s publication of data does not establish endorsement of DV&#x27;s category or a direct data-supply agreement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"two-opposite-directions-of-information\">Two opposite directions of information</h2>\n<p>The [2023 Reports by ESP table](http[local research file] PDF1, counts reports providers submitted to the CyberTipline about suspected exploitation/apparent CSAM on their systems. It says volume and content vary because the reporting framework did not then require proactive detection or prescribe the information to include. An incoming report count is not a count of outbound NCMEC notices, unique victims, confirmed incidents or criminal domains.</p>\n<p>The currently hosted2023 annual report, PDF7, adds that higher reporting may reflect robust detection/removal, and that inadequate reports can add volume without helping an actionable investigation. Its current file was modified after DV&#x27;s announcement, so this passage is supportive methodological explanation, not a proven byte-for-byte historical input.</p>\n<p>The [2021 outbound table](http[local research file] and [2022 outbound table](http[local research file] each PDF1, describe NCMEC visually reviewing imagery reported by victims, caregivers and, expressly in2022, INHOPE hotlines, then notifying relevant providers. These are more specific than unreviewed incoming report totals. They still record notification activity and response, not final court findings about whole domains.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the2023-columns-are-consequential\">The2023 columns are consequential</h2>\n<p>Both the [responsive](http[local research file] and [unresponsive](http[local research file] tables explain their three categories on PDF1: CSAM; exploitative content depicting identified child victims that does not meet the legal CSAM definition; and predatory text involving sexual comments or personal information about identified victims. Those categories must remain separate. A total across them cannot simply be labelled confirmed criminal CSAM.</p>\n<p>NCMEC says staff review the imagery, notify the provider, manually track status and send additional notices until content is addressed. The responsive introduction says company terms may lead to imagery removal or user blocking. Its table reports notifications and average days to respond/takedown, by category and total. The unresponsive table reports notification counts without response-time columns. Neither introductory methodology defines the counting unit as a unique incident, file, victim or site; repeat notifications expressly prevent treating it as such.</p>\n<p>The combined response/takedown heading should not be silently rewritten as a pure time-to-removal metric. The2021 footnote, PDF10, says some removal times are unavailable after unsuccessful notification efforts and NCMEC seeks other options such as contacting upstream providers. The2022 footnote, PDF12, makes clear that missing times can concern some notices, even where a provider has a numerical average for others. The tables do not provide a universal deadline, a causal explanation for every nonresponse, or the underlying notifications.</p>\n<p>The same named provider can appear in both2023 tables. CloudFlare, Inc appears on responsivePDF4 with5,183 notifications across the three categories and an average of1.53 days, and on unresponsivePDF1 with7 CSAM notices. These are separate published aggregates, not a current rate or a count this inquiry independently audited. This example disproves a reading of the headings as permanently exclusive whole-company labels. Alibaba likewise appears in both (responsivePDF2, unresponsivePDF1). The notices&#x27; dates, subjects and reasons for differing outcomes were not acquired; no individual notice is inferred.</p>\n<p>Rows mix provider names, domains and grouped services. The explicit upstream-contact route cautions against converting a hosting/infrastructure recipient directly into the offending destination site. The relevant entity-to-domain and content-location mapping has to be established separately. No listed site was visited.</p>\n<h2 id=\"chronology-reporting-year-is-not-publication-date\">Chronology: reporting year is not publication date</h2>\n<p>The current NCMEC archive page retained in the earlier PhotoDNA wave links2021 and2022 notification tables and the2023 split tables. Those links establish the archive&#x27;s present organization, not its exact state on13 February2025.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Artifact acquired now</th>\n<th>Date evidence in the original</th>\n<th>What can be concluded</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>2021 notification table</td>\n<td>Copyright2022; PDF created/modified22 March2022</td>\n<td>A historical2021 table with pre-announcement file metadata; first public upload not independently established.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2022 notification table</td>\n<td>Copyright2023; PDF created/modified1 May2023</td>\n<td>Same limited chronology conclusion; not proof DV selected it.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2023 responsive/unresponsive tables and Reports by ESP</td>\n<td>Copyright2024; PDF created/modified12 April2024</td>\n<td>Plausible public-source candidates before DV&#x27;s announcement; exact historical public versions/selection not established.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2023 annual report currently hosted</td>\n<td>Created15 April2024; modified3 June2025</td>\n<td>Current bytes cannot be assumed identical to the version available in February2025. No specific content change identified.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NCMEC2024-data release post</td>\n<td>Dated8 May2025</td>\n<td>This acquired release is later than DV&#x27;s announcement and cannot establish what DV had on13 February.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>PDF metadata is document metadata, not an authenticated publication log. This packet does not declare2021-2023 to be DV&#x27;s three years, or assume all2024 annual data were unavailable in February2025.</p>\n<p>The official <a>5 February2024 post</a>.</p>\n<p>The separate hash-sharing programme is not the same resource as these public provider/notification tables. The previously acquired15 April2024 NCMEC audit announcement concerns reviewed image/video hashes. Its assurance about that resource cannot certify a separate advertising domain list or identify DV&#x27;s input files.</p>\n<h2 id=\"competing-interpretations-and-the-record-that-would-decide\">Competing interpretations and the record that would decide</h2>\n<p>One reading consistent with DV&#x27;s account is that it used historical outbound-notice tables, filtered relevant CSAM notices, resolved provider/domain identities and applied additional classification judgment. Another possibility is broader use of totals or provider membership across heterogeneous categories. The acquired originals establish why those choices matter, but do not establish which occurred. Nor does the existence of responsive notices erase the potential relevance of underlying harmful material; response performance and content risk are different questions.</p>\n<p>The high-value missing record is DV&#x27;s dated source inventory and transformation specification: exact NCMEC URLs/versions/years; included columns and responsive/unresponsive treatment; repeat-notice handling; provider/domain resolution; exclusions; and the provenance for final category decisions. The next archival record, if needed, is a dated public snapshot of the selected NCMEC files. Neither requires access to illegal imagery or private CyberTipline reports.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-actual-scope\">Custody and actual scope</h2>\n<p>Eight new originals were acquired by ordinary unauthenticated GET, all200: six PDFs and two HTML posts. input-get.json and input-date-get.json retain transport/metadata; input-captures.json records SHA256 and reading scope. No acquisition route failed or was retried. A few focused discovery searches returned current NCMEC pages, unrelated material and public dates; no unrelated branch was opened.</p>\n<p>Actual table scope:2021 PDF1 and final-page10 footnote/totals;2022 PDF1 and final-page12 footnote/totals;2023 responsivePDF1, selected AlibabaPDF2 and CloudFlarePDF4 rows, and final-page22 totals;2023 unresponsivePDF1 and final-page4 totals, with intervening text visible in extraction but no claimed complete row audit;2023 Reports by ESP PDF1 introduction/header only. The key2023 headers/CloudFlare rows and2021/22 footnotes were visually checked in retained PNGs. No row totals were recalculated across years or treated as a prevalence denominator.</p>\n<p>The annual report was keyword-scanned; selected extractedPDF7,12-13,15-16 were read, with onlyPDF7 and12-13 material used for this question and the modification-date caveat retained. Both dated posts&#x27; complete substantive text was read; embedded videos/forms were not used. The prior DV announcement&#x27;s whole substantive body and the prior NCMEC archive links were read locally. Acquisition now stops for combined review; no case, reader, ZIP or operational data was changed.</p>",
        "path": "ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09/input-meaning.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-ncmec2021",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec2022",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-responsive",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-unresponsive",
          "w30-class-s-ncmec-incoming"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed on9 September2026. The historical source family is identified; DoubleVerify's exact three years, files, filters and provider-to-domain mapping remain unestablished.\n\n## What DoubleVerify actually said\n\nThe retained13 February2025 [DoubleVerify announcement](https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together) says it reviewed three years of public NCMEC data as a starting point, analyzed over300 domains/electronic service providers that had received CSAM-related notices, cross-referenced existing classifications, and conducted site-by-site analysis for the remainder while excluding large, well-moderated social/search services. It does not identify those years or the files and columns used.\n\nThose qualifications matter. This investigation has not established that DV equated every NCMEC row with illegal content, nor that it confined its inputs to the CSAM column. Its own claimed additional analysis is part of the transformation to be tested. NCMEC's publication of data does not establish endorsement of DV's category or a direct data-supply agreement.\n\n## Two opposite directions of information\n\nThe 2023 Reports by ESP table (see source references) PDF1, counts reports providers submitted to the CyberTipline about suspected exploitation/apparent CSAM on their systems. It says volume and content vary because the reporting framework did not then require proactive detection or prescribe the information to include. An incoming report count is not a count of outbound NCMEC notices, unique victims, confirmed incidents or criminal domains.\n\nThe currently hosted2023 annual report, PDF7, adds that higher reporting may reflect robust detection/removal, and that inadequate reports can add volume without helping an actionable investigation. Its current file was modified after DV's announcement, so this passage is supportive methodological explanation, not a proven byte-for-byte historical input.\n\nThe 2021 outbound table (see source references) and 2022 outbound table (see source references) each PDF1, describe NCMEC visually reviewing imagery reported by victims, caregivers and, expressly in2022, INHOPE hotlines, then notifying relevant providers. These are more specific than unreviewed incoming report totals. They still record notification activity and response, not final court findings about whole domains.\n\n## The2023 columns are consequential\n\nBoth the responsive (see source references) and unresponsive (see source references) tables explain their three categories on PDF1: CSAM; exploitative content depicting identified child victims that does not meet the legal CSAM definition; and predatory text involving sexual comments or personal information about identified victims. Those categories must remain separate. A total across them cannot simply be labelled confirmed criminal CSAM.\n\nNCMEC says staff review the imagery, notify the provider, manually track status and send additional notices until content is addressed. The responsive introduction says company terms may lead to imagery removal or user blocking. Its table reports notifications and average days to respond/takedown, by category and total. The unresponsive table reports notification counts without response-time columns. Neither introductory methodology defines the counting unit as a unique incident, file, victim or site; repeat notifications expressly prevent treating it as such.\n\nThe combined response/takedown heading should not be silently rewritten as a pure time-to-removal metric. The2021 footnote, PDF10, says some removal times are unavailable after unsuccessful notification efforts and NCMEC seeks other options such as contacting upstream providers. The2022 footnote, PDF12, makes clear that missing times can concern some notices, even where a provider has a numerical average for others. The tables do not provide a universal deadline, a causal explanation for every nonresponse, or the underlying notifications.\n\nThe same named provider can appear in both2023 tables. CloudFlare, Inc appears on responsivePDF4 with5,183 notifications across the three categories and an average of1.53 days, and on unresponsivePDF1 with7 CSAM notices. These are separate published aggregates, not a current rate or a count this inquiry independently audited. This example disproves a reading of the headings as permanently exclusive whole-company labels. Alibaba likewise appears in both (responsivePDF2, unresponsivePDF1). The notices' dates, subjects and reasons for differing outcomes were not acquired; no individual notice is inferred.\n\nRows mix provider names, domains and grouped services. The explicit upstream-contact route cautions against converting a hosting/infrastructure recipient directly into the offending destination site. The relevant entity-to-domain and content-location mapping has to be established separately. No listed site was visited.\n\n## Chronology: reporting year is not publication date\n\nThe current NCMEC archive page retained in the earlier PhotoDNA wave links2021 and2022 notification tables and the2023 split tables. Those links establish the archive's present organization, not its exact state on13 February2025.\n\n| Artifact acquired now | Date evidence in the original | What can be concluded |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 2021 notification table | Copyright2022; PDF created/modified22 March2022 | A historical2021 table with pre-announcement file metadata; first public upload not independently established. |\n| 2022 notification table | Copyright2023; PDF created/modified1 May2023 | Same limited chronology conclusion; not proof DV selected it. |\n| 2023 responsive/unresponsive tables and Reports by ESP | Copyright2024; PDF created/modified12 April2024 | Plausible public-source candidates before DV's announcement; exact historical public versions/selection not established. |\n| 2023 annual report currently hosted | Created15 April2024; modified3 June2025 | Current bytes cannot be assumed identical to the version available in February2025. No specific content change identified. |\n| NCMEC2024-data release post | Dated8 May2025 | This acquired release is later than DV's announcement and cannot establish what DV had on13 February. |\n\nPDF metadata is document metadata, not an authenticated publication log. This packet does not declare2021-2023 to be DV's three years, or assume all2024 annual data were unavailable in February2025.\n\nThe official 5 February2024 post.\n\nThe separate hash-sharing programme is not the same resource as these public provider/notification tables. The previously acquired15 April2024 NCMEC audit announcement concerns reviewed image/video hashes. Its assurance about that resource cannot certify a separate advertising domain list or identify DV's input files.\n\n## Competing interpretations and the record that would decide\n\nOne reading consistent with DV's account is that it used historical outbound-notice tables, filtered relevant CSAM notices, resolved provider/domain identities and applied additional classification judgment. Another possibility is broader use of totals or provider membership across heterogeneous categories. The acquired originals establish why those choices matter, but do not establish which occurred. Nor does the existence of responsive notices erase the potential relevance of underlying harmful material; response performance and content risk are different questions.\n\nThe high-value missing record is DV's dated source inventory and transformation specification: exact NCMEC URLs/versions/years; included columns and responsive/unresponsive treatment; repeat-notice handling; provider/domain resolution; exclusions; and the provenance for final category decisions. The next archival record, if needed, is a dated public snapshot of the selected NCMEC files. Neither requires access to illegal imagery or private CyberTipline reports.\n\n## Custody and actual scope\n\nEight new originals were acquired by ordinary unauthenticated GET, all200: six PDFs and two HTML posts. input-get.json and input-date-get.json retain transport/metadata; input-captures.json records SHA256 and reading scope. No acquisition route failed or was retried. A few focused discovery searches returned current NCMEC pages, unrelated material and public dates; no unrelated branch was opened.\n\nActual table scope:2021 PDF1 and final-page10 footnote/totals;2022 PDF1 and final-page12 footnote/totals;2023 responsivePDF1, selected AlibabaPDF2 and CloudFlarePDF4 rows, and final-page22 totals;2023 unresponsivePDF1 and final-page4 totals, with intervening text visible in extraction but no claimed complete row audit;2023 Reports by ESP PDF1 introduction/header only. The key2023 headers/CloudFlare rows and2021/22 footnotes were visually checked in retained PNGs. No row totals were recalculated across years or treated as a prevalence denominator.\n\nThe annual report was keyword-scanned; selected extractedPDF7,12-13,15-16 were read, with onlyPDF7 and12-13 material used for this question and the modification-date caveat retained. Both dated posts' complete substantive text was read; embedded videos/forms were not used. The prior DV announcement's whole substantive body and the prior NCMEC archive links were read locally. Acquisition now stops for combined review; no case, reader, ZIP or operational data was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-input-meaning.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action",
        "title": "Nominet exercised domain action: reported requests and reversals",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. Official Nominet reader/index records only; no original GET, domain operation, account, form, content/media access, outreach or Explorer action. Current standing/remedy rules belong to the parallel authority lane.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. Official Nominet reader/index records only; no original GET, domain operation, account, form, content/media access, outreach or Explorer action. Current standing/remedy rules belong to the parallel authority lane.</p>\n<p>The inspected reports document IWF suspension requests, but do not identify their domains or publish an individual decision trail. They also report reversals and requests that did not lead to suspension. These demonstrate reported operational activity and limits; they do not establish wrongful decisions, independent verification, or rights created by Nominet&#x27;s funding of UKSIC.</p>\n<h2 id=\"comparable-labels-bounded-periods\">Comparable labels, bounded periods</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Reporting period</th>\n<th>IWF-labelled suspension requests</th>\n<th>Criminal Practices Policy domains suspended</th>\n<th>Requests not resulting in suspension</th>\n<th>Suspension reversals</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1 November 2019–31 October 2020</td>\n<td>0</td>\n<td>22,158</td>\n<td>47</td>\n<td>15</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1 November 2022–31 October 2023</td>\n<td>1</td>\n<td>1,193</td>\n<td>3</td>\n<td>19</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1 November 2023–31 October 2024</td>\n<td>1</td>\n<td>913</td>\n<td>0</td>\n<td>16</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Sources are the official [2020 report](http[local research file] [2023 report](http[local research file] and [2025 Impact Issue](http[local research file] These are selected periods, not a continuous time series or September2026 snapshot. Publication/upload year is not activity year.</p>\n<p>The IWF metric is expressly a request. Neither a case-specific successful suspension nor an IWF reversal is established by the aggregate columns. Do not derive either from a zero total of unsuccessful requests. The source does not reconcile the IWF-labelled metric with the agency totals; it must not be added to the reported suspension total as an extra domain. No UKSIC consortium-labelled request or named IWF-origin domain case was located in this pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"requests-decisions-and-implementation\">Requests, decisions and implementation</h2>\n<p>Both one-page reports and the2025 spread depict agencies notifying Nominet, Nominet making administrative checks, and Nominet notifying the registrant and working with the registrar to suspend the domain. That is their summary of the law-enforcement process; it does not prove IWF is a law-enforcement agency or that its requests use every step of that route. Current eligibility, discretion and challenge rules must come from the parallel policy packet. The named examples in the reports belong to Domain Watch phishing categories, not the IWF case path.</p>\n<p>The2023 report explains that a non-suspension can reflect previous suspension, a court-ordered transfer, or subsequent compliance. It attributes reversal to cessation of the offending behaviour followed by confirmation from the enforcing agency. Its19 reversals are therefore not19 adjudicated false positives, independent appeals or reinstated IWF domains. It also reports1,058 proscribed-term flags and no domain suspensions, separating an automated flag from final action. No registrar names, individual certification, applicant correspondence or restoration trace accompanies the IWF statistic.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-different-positive-correction-account\">A different positive correction account</h2>\n<p>The [1 December 2020 Nominet announcement](http[local research file] retained as an indexed-primary body after full-reader failure, explicitly assigns 5,006 suspensions pending checks and 558 completed registrations to Domain Watch. This prose corroborates the category assignment without relying on the one-page PDF&#x27;s ambiguous extracted column order. That is positive Nominet-reported movement out of a hold, distinct from the 15 Criminal Practices Policy reversals. A separate paragraph reports 3,811 COVID-related holds and 1,568 completed checks as of 28 October 2020. The categories must not simply be added; overlap is not resolved. None proves that an initial flag was unlawful, that all false positives were remedied, or that an IWF request was reversed. This is the same publisher&#x27;s corroborating account, not independent verification of individual outcomes.</p>\n<p>Nominet&#x27;s [9 December2021 announcement](http[local research file] is available here only as an indexed-primary body after reader failure. It distinguishes539 separate law-enforcement requests from3,434 suspended domains for the year to31October2021. A request can therefore concern more than one domain; report vocabulary must be retained rather than treated as a uniform unit across all years. It also reports no IWF requests in that period. No full-page or original-byte read is claimed for this announcement.</p>\n<p>An indexed passage of [Nominet&#x27;s retrospective on IWF&#x27;s2020 report](http[local research file] says there were11 CSAM reports in .UK but no domain suspensions were necessary after investigation; it gives search-result deindexing as a more appropriate intervention in an example category. This is a Nominet account, not11 cases independently reviewed here. The full article returned429 and the route is closed. Its exact publication date was not established. The passage is useful because content reports, IWF domain-suspension requests and domain actions plainly need not be the same thing. Other numerical ratios in the indexed passage were not adopted or audited.</p>\n<h2 id=\"scope-limitations-and-next-record\">Scope, limitations and next record</h2>\n<p>Read the complete substantive textual extraction of each one-page2020 and2023 report (including category descriptions and example labels); read the2025 Impact Issue&#x27;s complete Criminal Activity spread, PDF9/printed16–17, reader lines971–1070. Surrounding pages appeared in the reader but no additional domain-case claims rely on them. No PDF facsimile was inspected in this lane. Four local .txt captures retain reader text, a clearly labelled scoped extraction, and indexed-primary article passages, including the subsequently reviewed 1 December 2020 category corroboration. Their SHA256 values are capture hashes, never original PDF/HTML hashes. exercised-action-captures.json records exact sources, dates, scopes and access failures.</p>\n<p>Seven focused discovery queries tested IWF requests, recent reversals, UKSIC-labelled action and the older report-category contrast. No named IWF/UKSIC refusal or reinstatement was located; that is a scoped retrieval gap, not absence of such cases. Unrelated IWF acronym results and third-party commentary were excluded. The old2013 registration-review terms-of-reference lead was passed to the authority lane, not acquired here. No failed Nominet GET or FY2026 report was reopened.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is the administrative file behind one of the publicly reported IWF requests: original notification/certification, the domain-level decision, registrar implementation, and any review/restoration correspondence. A redacted case record could resolve standing and exercised discretion without disclosing abusive media or a harmful-content URL. Likely custodians are Nominet&#x27;s compliance/legal function and IWF&#x27;s operational referral team. No contact is authorised or attempted. Until such a record is available, the supported relation is reported IWF requests plus Nominet&#x27;s separately described domain machinery, not a completed proof that a funding relationship compelled suspension.</p>",
        "path": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09/exercised-action.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-action2020",
          "w29-enf-s-action2023",
          "w29-enf-s-impact2025-actions"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition CLOSED. Official Nominet reader/index records only; no original GET, domain operation, account, form, content/media access, outreach or Explorer action. Current standing/remedy rules belong to the parallel authority lane.\n\nThe inspected reports document IWF suspension requests, but do not identify their domains or publish an individual decision trail. They also report reversals and requests that did not lead to suspension. These demonstrate reported operational activity and limits; they do not establish wrongful decisions, independent verification, or rights created by Nominet's funding of UKSIC.\n\n## Comparable labels, bounded periods\n\n| Reporting period | IWF-labelled suspension requests | Criminal Practices Policy domains suspended | Requests not resulting in suspension | Suspension reversals |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1 November 2019–31 October 2020 | 0 | 22,158 | 47 | 15 |\n| 1 November 2022–31 October 2023 | 1 | 1,193 | 3 | 19 |\n| 1 November 2023–31 October 2024 | 1 | 913 | 0 | 16 |\n\nSources are the official 2020 report (see source references) 2023 report (see source references) and 2025 Impact Issue (see source references) These are selected periods, not a continuous time series or September2026 snapshot. Publication/upload year is not activity year.\n\nThe IWF metric is expressly a request. Neither a case-specific successful suspension nor an IWF reversal is established by the aggregate columns. Do not derive either from a zero total of unsuccessful requests. The source does not reconcile the IWF-labelled metric with the agency totals; it must not be added to the reported suspension total as an extra domain. No UKSIC consortium-labelled request or named IWF-origin domain case was located in this pass.\n\n## Requests, decisions and implementation\n\nBoth one-page reports and the2025 spread depict agencies notifying Nominet, Nominet making administrative checks, and Nominet notifying the registrant and working with the registrar to suspend the domain. That is their summary of the law-enforcement process; it does not prove IWF is a law-enforcement agency or that its requests use every step of that route. Current eligibility, discretion and challenge rules must come from the parallel policy packet. The named examples in the reports belong to Domain Watch phishing categories, not the IWF case path.\n\nThe2023 report explains that a non-suspension can reflect previous suspension, a court-ordered transfer, or subsequent compliance. It attributes reversal to cessation of the offending behaviour followed by confirmation from the enforcing agency. Its19 reversals are therefore not19 adjudicated false positives, independent appeals or reinstated IWF domains. It also reports1,058 proscribed-term flags and no domain suspensions, separating an automated flag from final action. No registrar names, individual certification, applicant correspondence or restoration trace accompanies the IWF statistic.\n\n## A different positive correction account\n\nThe 1 December 2020 Nominet announcement (see source references) retained as an indexed-primary body after full-reader failure, explicitly assigns 5,006 suspensions pending checks and 558 completed registrations to Domain Watch. This prose corroborates the category assignment without relying on the one-page PDF's ambiguous extracted column order. That is positive Nominet-reported movement out of a hold, distinct from the 15 Criminal Practices Policy reversals. A separate paragraph reports 3,811 COVID-related holds and 1,568 completed checks as of 28 October 2020. The categories must not simply be added; overlap is not resolved. None proves that an initial flag was unlawful, that all false positives were remedied, or that an IWF request was reversed. This is the same publisher's corroborating account, not independent verification of individual outcomes.\n\nNominet's 9 December2021 announcement (see source references) is available here only as an indexed-primary body after reader failure. It distinguishes539 separate law-enforcement requests from3,434 suspended domains for the year to31October2021. A request can therefore concern more than one domain; report vocabulary must be retained rather than treated as a uniform unit across all years. It also reports no IWF requests in that period. No full-page or original-byte read is claimed for this announcement.\n\nAn indexed passage of Nominet's retrospective on IWF's2020 report (see source references) says there were11 CSAM reports in .UK but no domain suspensions were necessary after investigation; it gives search-result deindexing as a more appropriate intervention in an example category. This is a Nominet account, not11 cases independently reviewed here. The full article returned429 and the route is closed. Its exact publication date was not established. The passage is useful because content reports, IWF domain-suspension requests and domain actions plainly need not be the same thing. Other numerical ratios in the indexed passage were not adopted or audited.\n\n## Scope, limitations and next record\n\nRead the complete substantive textual extraction of each one-page2020 and2023 report (including category descriptions and example labels); read the2025 Impact Issue's complete Criminal Activity spread, PDF9/printed16–17, reader lines971–1070. Surrounding pages appeared in the reader but no additional domain-case claims rely on them. No PDF facsimile was inspected in this lane. Four local .txt captures retain reader text, a clearly labelled scoped extraction, and indexed-primary article passages, including the subsequently reviewed 1 December 2020 category corroboration. Their SHA256 values are capture hashes, never original PDF/HTML hashes. exercised-action-captures.json records exact sources, dates, scopes and access failures.\n\nSeven focused discovery queries tested IWF requests, recent reversals, UKSIC-labelled action and the older report-category contrast. No named IWF/UKSIC refusal or reinstatement was located; that is a scoped retrieval gap, not absence of such cases. Unrelated IWF acronym results and third-party commentary were excluded. The old2013 registration-review terms-of-reference lead was passed to the authority lane, not acquired here. No failed Nominet GET or FY2026 report was reopened.\n\nThe next discriminating record is the administrative file behind one of the publicly reported IWF requests: original notification/certification, the domain-level decision, registrar implementation, and any review/restoration correspondence. A redacted case record could resolve standing and exercised discretion without disclosing abusive media or a harmful-content URL. Likely custodians are Nominet's compliance/legal function and IWF's operational referral team. No contact is authorised or attempted. Until such a record is available, the supported relation is reported IWF requests plus Nominet's separately described domain machinery, not a completed proof that a funding relationship compelled suspension.\n",
        "file": "research/nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-exercised-action.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority",
        "title": "Nominet domain-action authority: certification, private contract and review",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. This is a policy/standing packet; exercised requests and reversals belong to the parallel outcomes lane. No registry operation, account, form, outreach, domain-content retrieval or ordinary Nominet GET was used.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. This is a policy/standing packet; exercised requests and reversals belong to the parallel outcomes lane. No registry operation, account, form, outreach, domain-content retrieval or ordinary Nominet GET was used.</p>\n<p>IWF&#x27;s documented cooperation with Nominet predates the 2021 UKSIC grant. The evidence does not establish that receiving the grant created a suspension entitlement. The current policy&#x27;s named-agency list, a historical IWF cooperation statement and reported IWF requests are distinct evidence types. Their combination warrants investigating a separate referral arrangement; it does not supply its terms.</p>\n<h2 id=\"which-instruments-are-current-linked\">Which instruments are current-linked?</h2>\n<p>The official [.UK Policy page](http[local research file] read at its current-policy section and future-policy distinction, links the Criminal Practices Policy dated <strong>6 July 2026</strong> and registrant terms dated <strong>20 March 2024</strong>. It separately identifies revised agreements/policies taking effect on <strong>9 February 2027</strong>, and says the Criminal Practices Policy will remain unchanged at that transition. The upload directories are not substituted for document dates. This establishes what Nominet currently publishes, not historical applicability to every reported case.</p>\n<h2 id=\"criminal-practices-policy-the-operative-allocation-of-decisions\">Criminal Practices Policy: the operative allocation of decisions</h2>\n<p>The [6 July 2026 policy](http[local research file] supplies this mechanism:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Question</th>\n<th>Published rule</th>\n<th>Locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Who establishes criminality?</td>\n<td>A listed UK enforcement agency provides official written certification. Nominet describes its role as administrative checking, acknowledging limited criminal-assessment expertise.</td>\n<td>§§2–3, PDF 3</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>What follows?</td>\n<td>Following checks and notice, Nominet places the domain in special status unless satisfactory action already occurred.</td>\n<td>§3, PDF 3</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Notice and urgency</td>\n<td>At least 48 hours&#x27; notice; significant evidence of imminent public harm permits immediate suspension with senior-management approval. Agency confirmation that criminal use ended stops the process.</td>\n<td>§3, PDF 4</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Duration/effect</td>\n<td>.UK: minimum 24 months; .cymru/.wales: until expiry, then cancellation/re-registration. Suspension/redirection disrupts access without removing hosted content.</td>\n<td>§§3,5, PDF 4,7</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Challenge</td>\n<td>Criminality assessment: agency complaint/appeal routes, with ombudsman, police-conduct and judicial-review examples. Policy application: Nominet complaints.</td>\n<td>§3, PDF 4</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Named standing</td>\n<td>Section 4 lists 15 enforcement entries, including Gambling Commission. Neither IWF nor UKSIC appears. This is a list observation, not exclusion of every separate route.</td>\n<td>§4, PDF 4–6</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"contractual-authority-is-broader-than-the-certification-procedure\">Contractual authority is broader than the certification procedure</h2>\n<p>Nominet&#x27;s current-linked [registrant terms](http[local research file] prohibit unlawful domain use (§6.1.5). Section10.1.2 reserves sole-discretion action for use, or high risk of use, likely to endanger DNS, users or Nominet systems; this differs from an agency certifying criminality. Section10.2.5 separately permits changes to implement a valid binding court order or avoid contempt. The private policy therefore must not be redescribed as a court order.</p>\n<p>The terms&#x27; proscribed-name definition requires both an apparent serious-sexual-offence meaning and no reasonably contemplated legitimate use (§1); §6.1.4 applies it to the domain&#x27;s characters. That is not a prohibition of any unpopular website content. Section13.2 gives nonparties no enforcement rights under these terms; it does not negate rights arising under a separate agreement.</p>\n<p>Remedies also have limits: §§12.3–12.5 exclude specified losses and cap liability at £5,000, with those clauses inapplicable to consumers under §12.6. Section13.8 selects England/Wales law and courts, accepting local law/courts for Scottish or Northern Irish consumers. These are contract provisions, not an enforceability opinion or case-specific ruling. Material locators: PDF 3,5–9.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-iwf-relationship-before-the-consortium-grant\">The IWF relationship before the consortium grant</h2>\n<p>The historical [Domain registration policy review: Terms of Reference](http[local research file] PDF 2 §3, reports that Nominet is an IWF member and will act promptly to remove access to child sexual abuse images and criminally obscene adult content. It describes enforcement-agency working relationships in the preceding paragraph. The record is set in 2013 by its reference to the 4 August 2013 newspaper article and dated review timetable; an exact publication day was not established.</p>\n<p>This is explicit historical cooperation, not a signed IWF referral protocol. It does not identify evidential thresholds, a binding certification power, notice exceptions, an IWF-specific appeal process or UKSIC authority. It predates the 2021 consortium pledge examined in the accepted <a href=\"/research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards\">award packet</a>. That chronology weighs against a claim that the later grant originated the relationship. It does not prove there was no earlier financing or that the relationship&#x27;s scope never changed. Current IWF case counts belong to the outcomes packet and must retain their periods and request/action distinctions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"historical-remedy-promises-should-not-silently-become-current-deadlines\">Historical remedy promises should not silently become current deadlines</h2>\n<p>Nominet&#x27;s [3 April 2014 announcement](http[local research file] announced changes effective 4 May 2014. Its criminal-domain section said a suspension could be lifted when criminal conduct ended, when wrongly applied, or when the referring agency failed to respond within 10 working days. Its separate proscribed-name section described senior-manager checking, a 30-day appeal window and an independent external review of unresolved disagreements. These statements concern different decision tracks.</p>\n<p>Those historical safeguards are useful, but the current CPP does not reproduce that 10-working-day nonresponse rule in its inspected complaints section. I have not established whether another operative document preserves it, nor identified the proscribed-name external reviewer. The current general complaints landing failed to load; an indexed excerpt was discovered but was not treated as the full procedure. The generic registrar complaint template surfaced in search is expressly a template, not a substitute for Nominet&#x27;s own current procedure. No general right to automatic reinstatement has been inferred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"separate-statutory-development-reported-status-only\">Separate statutory development: reported status only</h2>\n<p>Nominet&#x27;s [16 July 2026 blog](http[local research file] reports Royal Assent to the Crime and Policing Act on 29 April 2026, describes court-ordered domain suspension as a backstop, and says commencement legislation was still needed, with an indicative end-November expectation. It reports government reassurance that voluntary CPP suspensions remain the first route. This packet does not verify the Act&#x27;s provisions, its commencement as of 9 September, or any actual order. The linked legislation.gov.uk PDF returned 429 and was not read. The statutory instrument/commencement question is parked for a separately selected run; the blog is evidence of Nominet&#x27;s stated implementation position.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-reading-scope-and-closed-routes\">Custody, reading scope and closed routes</h2>\n<p>All successful source reads in this lane used the official web reader. <strong>No original HTML or PDF bytes were acquired.</strong> Retained policy-*.reader.txt files are exact tool-return derivatives; their hashes identify those derivatives, never the underlying originals. <a>policy-captures.json</a> records URLs, dates, ancestry, locators, failures and source states.</p>\n<p>The CPP&#x27;s complete seven-page reader text was read, including every agency entry and the version table. Registrant terms: complete nine-page reader text, with the substantive authority/remedy analysis confined to the cited clauses. The historical review&#x27;s complete four-page text was read; no contribution form was used. The 2014 announcement&#x27;s substantive body, lines 43–73, and the July 2026 blog&#x27;s substantive body, lines 43–102, were read. The current policy landing&#x27;s lines 51–141 establish current/future links; unrelated council names and member-account material are not findings here. No screenshot or visual-original inspection is claimed.</p>\n<p>The old /policies link returned a non-retryable safe-open error. Targeted official search identified a genuinely different current publication page; the failed URL was not retried. The Security &amp; Protection reader returned 429; the Complaints link returned an internal error; the linked Act PDF returned 429. All stayed closed, with no GET, URL-variant, mirror or support-layer recovery. Search-only hits and generic templates are recorded as discovery/exclusion rather than read operative authority. No new donor or grant-agreement hunt was undertaken.</p>\n<p>The finite next record is an <strong>IWF–Nominet referral/membership operating protocol or a public administrative case record</strong> explaining how an IWF request becomes a registry decision, who may contest the classification, and who can authorize reversal. Likely custodians are Nominet registry/legal operations and IWF. A second narrow gap is the actual current Nominet complaint procedure or identified external-review mandate. Until obtained, the defensible mechanism is separate contractual registry action, listed-agency certification and documented IWF cooperation. Expertise and earlier operational cooperation remain alternatives to a funding-created-right explanation.</p>",
        "path": "nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09/policy-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-cpp2026",
          "w29-enf-s-terms2024",
          "w29-enf-s-iwf2013",
          "w29-enf-s-formal2014",
          "w29-enf-s-statutory-account2026"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. This is a policy/standing packet; exercised requests and reversals belong to the parallel outcomes lane. No registry operation, account, form, outreach, domain-content retrieval or ordinary Nominet GET was used.\n\nIWF's documented cooperation with Nominet predates the 2021 UKSIC grant. The evidence does not establish that receiving the grant created a suspension entitlement. The current policy's named-agency list, a historical IWF cooperation statement and reported IWF requests are distinct evidence types. Their combination warrants investigating a separate referral arrangement; it does not supply its terms.\n\n## Which instruments are current-linked?\n\nThe official .UK Policy page (see source references) read at its current-policy section and future-policy distinction, links the Criminal Practices Policy dated **6 July 2026** and registrant terms dated **20 March 2024**. It separately identifies revised agreements/policies taking effect on **9 February 2027**, and says the Criminal Practices Policy will remain unchanged at that transition. The upload directories are not substituted for document dates. This establishes what Nominet currently publishes, not historical applicability to every reported case.\n\n## Criminal Practices Policy: the operative allocation of decisions\n\nThe 6 July 2026 policy (see source references) supplies this mechanism:\n\n| Question | Published rule | Locator |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Who establishes criminality? | A listed UK enforcement agency provides official written certification. Nominet describes its role as administrative checking, acknowledging limited criminal-assessment expertise. | §§2–3, PDF 3 |\n| What follows? | Following checks and notice, Nominet places the domain in special status unless satisfactory action already occurred. | §3, PDF 3 |\n| Notice and urgency | At least 48 hours' notice; significant evidence of imminent public harm permits immediate suspension with senior-management approval. Agency confirmation that criminal use ended stops the process. | §3, PDF 4 |\n| Duration/effect | .UK: minimum 24 months; .cymru/.wales: until expiry, then cancellation/re-registration. Suspension/redirection disrupts access without removing hosted content. | §§3,5, PDF 4,7 |\n| Challenge | Criminality assessment: agency complaint/appeal routes, with ombudsman, police-conduct and judicial-review examples. Policy application: Nominet complaints. | §3, PDF 4 |\n| Named standing | Section 4 lists 15 enforcement entries, including Gambling Commission. Neither IWF nor UKSIC appears. This is a list observation, not exclusion of every separate route. | §4, PDF 4–6 |\n\n## Contractual authority is broader than the certification procedure\n\nNominet's current-linked registrant terms (see source references) prohibit unlawful domain use (§6.1.5). Section10.1.2 reserves sole-discretion action for use, or high risk of use, likely to endanger DNS, users or Nominet systems; this differs from an agency certifying criminality. Section10.2.5 separately permits changes to implement a valid binding court order or avoid contempt. The private policy therefore must not be redescribed as a court order.\n\nThe terms' proscribed-name definition requires both an apparent serious-sexual-offence meaning and no reasonably contemplated legitimate use (§1); §6.1.4 applies it to the domain's characters. That is not a prohibition of any unpopular website content. Section13.2 gives nonparties no enforcement rights under these terms; it does not negate rights arising under a separate agreement.\n\nRemedies also have limits: §§12.3–12.5 exclude specified losses and cap liability at £5,000, with those clauses inapplicable to consumers under §12.6. Section13.8 selects England/Wales law and courts, accepting local law/courts for Scottish or Northern Irish consumers. These are contract provisions, not an enforceability opinion or case-specific ruling. Material locators: PDF 3,5–9.\n\n## The IWF relationship before the consortium grant\n\nThe historical Domain registration policy review: Terms of Reference (see source references) PDF 2 §3, reports that Nominet is an IWF member and will act promptly to remove access to child sexual abuse images and criminally obscene adult content. It describes enforcement-agency working relationships in the preceding paragraph. The record is set in 2013 by its reference to the 4 August 2013 newspaper article and dated review timetable; an exact publication day was not established.\n\nThis is explicit historical cooperation, not a signed IWF referral protocol. It does not identify evidential thresholds, a binding certification power, notice exceptions, an IWF-specific appeal process or UKSIC authority. It predates the 2021 consortium pledge examined in the accepted [award packet](nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards.md). That chronology weighs against a claim that the later grant originated the relationship. It does not prove there was no earlier financing or that the relationship's scope never changed. Current IWF case counts belong to the outcomes packet and must retain their periods and request/action distinctions.\n\n## Historical remedy promises should not silently become current deadlines\n\nNominet's 3 April 2014 announcement (see source references) announced changes effective 4 May 2014. Its criminal-domain section said a suspension could be lifted when criminal conduct ended, when wrongly applied, or when the referring agency failed to respond within 10 working days. Its separate proscribed-name section described senior-manager checking, a 30-day appeal window and an independent external review of unresolved disagreements. These statements concern different decision tracks.\n\nThose historical safeguards are useful, but the current CPP does not reproduce that 10-working-day nonresponse rule in its inspected complaints section. I have not established whether another operative document preserves it, nor identified the proscribed-name external reviewer. The current general complaints landing failed to load; an indexed excerpt was discovered but was not treated as the full procedure. The generic registrar complaint template surfaced in search is expressly a template, not a substitute for Nominet's own current procedure. No general right to automatic reinstatement has been inferred.\n\n## Separate statutory development: reported status only\n\nNominet's 16 July 2026 blog (see source references) reports Royal Assent to the Crime and Policing Act on 29 April 2026, describes court-ordered domain suspension as a backstop, and says commencement legislation was still needed, with an indicative end-November expectation. It reports government reassurance that voluntary CPP suspensions remain the first route. This packet does not verify the Act's provisions, its commencement as of 9 September, or any actual order. The linked legislation.gov.uk PDF returned 429 and was not read. The statutory instrument/commencement question is parked for a separately selected run; the blog is evidence of Nominet's stated implementation position.\n\n## Custody, reading scope and closed routes\n\nAll successful source reads in this lane used the official web reader. **No original HTML or PDF bytes were acquired.** Retained policy-*.reader.txt files are exact tool-return derivatives; their hashes identify those derivatives, never the underlying originals. policy-captures.json records URLs, dates, ancestry, locators, failures and source states.\n\nThe CPP's complete seven-page reader text was read, including every agency entry and the version table. Registrant terms: complete nine-page reader text, with the substantive authority/remedy analysis confined to the cited clauses. The historical review's complete four-page text was read; no contribution form was used. The 2014 announcement's substantive body, lines 43–73, and the July 2026 blog's substantive body, lines 43–102, were read. The current policy landing's lines 51–141 establish current/future links; unrelated council names and member-account material are not findings here. No screenshot or visual-original inspection is claimed.\n\nThe old /policies link returned a non-retryable safe-open error. Targeted official search identified a genuinely different current publication page; the failed URL was not retried. The Security & Protection reader returned 429; the Complaints link returned an internal error; the linked Act PDF returned 429. All stayed closed, with no GET, URL-variant, mirror or support-layer recovery. Search-only hits and generic templates are recorded as discovery/exclusion rather than read operative authority. No new donor or grant-agreement hunt was undertaken.\n\nThe finite next record is an **IWF–Nominet referral/membership operating protocol or a public administrative case record** explaining how an IWF request becomes a registry decision, who may contest the classification, and who can authorize reversal. Likely custodians are Nominet registry/legal operations and IWF. A second narrow gap is the actual current Nominet complaint procedure or identified external-review mandate. Until obtained, the defensible mechanism is separate contractual registry action, listed-agency certification and documented IWF cooperation. Expertise and earlier operational cooperation remain alternatives to a funding-created-right explanation.\n",
        "file": "research/nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources",
        "title": "Nominet donor resources and decision rights",
        "description": "Bounded primary-source read, 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. This is a donor-side packet; uksic records in this wave belong to the separate recipient/award lane. No case, prior reader or ZIP changed.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded primary-source read, 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. This is a donor-side packet; <code>uksic</code> records in this wave belong to the separate recipient/award lane. No case, prior reader or ZIP changed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>The premise is partly right: registry business helps finance public-benefit work. The acquired record does <strong>not</strong> describe a simple annual .uk surplus passed straight to charities. It describes a mixed business, accumulated investments/reserves, Board-agreed commitments and a further distribution step through a CAF account. This establishes resource provision, not donor direction of every recipient policy or classification.</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-actor-and-corporate-authority\">Legal actor and corporate authority</h2>\n<p>The current official governance footer identifies <strong>Nominet UK, company 03203859</strong>, a company limited by guarantee. Its public governance description reports more than 2,000 members; that is the organisation&#x27;s current account, not an inspected membership register. Corporate members are not shareholders entitled to distributed profits. [Governance page](http[local research file] substantive body and footer, read 9 September 2026.</p>\n<p>The current-linked memorandum permits registry and related services and public-benefit contributions. Clause 3.12 authorizes donations, subscriptions, guarantees or free services for public, charitable or useful objects, with a political-party exclusion. Clause 6 directs income/capital to company objects and bars member profit distribution, subject to specified ordinary compensation/expense exceptions. This is a company constitution, not evidence that Nominet itself is a registered charity. [Memorandum](http[local research file] PDF pages 1–4 and targeted 5–7, clauses 3.12, 6, 8–9. Adoption date not established; the URL&#x27;s upload directory is not that date.</p>\n<p>The current-linked articles, amended by special resolution <strong>22 September 2020</strong>, give members election rights for up to four non-executive directors; the Board can appoint additional non-executives and executives under separate provisions. Board-appointed non-executives must seek member reappointment by ordinary resolution at the following AGM and periodically thereafter (article 30); executive appointments remain a separate category. Articles 35–42 put management of affairs/property with the Board, provide meeting/quorum/conflict rules, and permit delegation to committees or executives on conditions the Board can change or revoke. These powers support a Board-budget authority path, not an identified vote approving the UKSIC grant. [Articles](http[local research file] PDF pages 5–12, articles 19, 26–31 and 33–42. Registry-policy consultation under article 43 is not a general grant-approval consultation right.</p>\n<p>The current-linked dated voting by-law allocates <strong>25% of poll votes equally among members and 75% by paid-for domains associated with member tags</strong>, with caps and connected-party rules. This makes commercial involvement relevant to constitutional/election voting; it does not establish a particular registrar&#x27;s control of grant decisions. This is the linked 2012-file rule, not a reconstruction of every later ballot&#x27;s applicable caps. No current member-weight register, decisive ballot or donor appointment instruction was acquired. [Voting by-law](http[local research file] PDF pages 1–3, clauses 4.1–4.3, scoped text through line 82.</p>\n<h2 id=\"dated-financial-path-year-ended-31-march-2025\">Dated financial path: year ended 31 March 2025</h2>\n<p>Group figures in the [FY2025 report](http[local research file] registry revenue <strong>£40.147m</strong>, DNS revenue <strong>£15.750m</strong>, total <strong>£55.897m</strong> (PDF32). Registry is not necessarily exclusively .uk; recognized revenue is not cash receipts.</p>\n<p>The 2021 commitment of <strong>up to £65m</strong> could use reserves <strong>or annual surplus</strong>. FY2025 trading operating profit was <strong>£5.463m</strong>; public-benefit expense was <strong>£10.979m</strong>. Investment assets were <strong>£88.6m</strong>. These are distinct flow/stock measures (PDF5–6,26).</p>\n<p>Public-benefit expense comprised programme <strong>£10.585m</strong> and operating costs <strong>£0.394m</strong>. Programme spending included <strong>£1.6m transferred to Nominet&#x27;s CAF account</strong> for onward distribution in FY2026/27. The grant table excludes that transfer and reports <strong>UKSIC £1.647m</strong>. Do not add the transfer again or equate expenses with beneficiary bank receipts (PDF6).</p>\n<p>The former Public Benefit Committee&#x27;s work moved to the main Board. Accounting policy recognizes public-benefit initiatives on an accrual basis against Board-agreed commitments; donations have a different paid-recipient recognition condition (PDF13,21). This establishes reported governance/accounting, not observed grant approval or completion.</p>\n<h2 id=\"mechanism-and-competing-interpretation\">Mechanism and competing interpretation</h2>\n<p>The supported path is <strong>business income plus accumulated reserves → Nominet Board resource decisions → programme commitments/distribution arrangements → recipient work</strong>. A second path is <strong>commercially weighted member votes → some director appointments → Board oversight</strong>. These should remain distinct: neither proves that large registrars ordered a specific grant or that receiving a grant surrendered editorial discretion.</p>\n<p>The public constitution lets the Board delegate; it does not reveal whether a particular programme award required a Board vote, delegated approval or later amendments. Financial review and reported impact monitoring are also different from a contractual right to clear recipients&#x27; advocacy. Recipient autonomy remains a live alternative unless the actual instrument assigns such rights.</p>\n<h2 id=\"limits-custody-and-next-record\">Limits, custody and next record</h2>\n<p>The annual-reports page now links <strong>FY2026</strong>. Its web reader rejected the PDF for size; the single ordinary public GET returned 403. It was not read. FY2025 is therefore a dated inspected financial snapshot, <strong>not a claim about the latest balance sheet or current budget</strong>.</p>\n<p>Seven ordinary GETs returned identical 403 error bodies. They are retained with hashes as access observations only. The constitution and FY2025 claims above come from inspected official web-reader text; no successful PDF-original bytes were retained in this lane. <code>donor-captures.json</code> records exact scopes, reader-only status and error-body custody. The already-read current landing links establish which older instruments the site presented, not that no later instrument exists.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the <strong>current public-benefit budget/reserve policy and actual UKSIC award/renewal instrument or approval minute</strong>, including delegated limits, payment schedule, reporting, termination and any policy-clearance clauses. Board powers and accounting categories alone do not answer those questions. No wider donor genealogy or operational registry inquiry was opened.</p>",
        "path": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09/donor-resources.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-governance",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-articles2020",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-memorandum",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-voting2012",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2025",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-accounts2026-unacquired"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded primary-source read, 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. This is a donor-side packet; `uksic` records in this wave belong to the separate recipient/award lane. No case, prior reader or ZIP changed.\n\n## Finding\n\nThe premise is partly right: registry business helps finance public-benefit work. The acquired record does **not** describe a simple annual .uk surplus passed straight to charities. It describes a mixed business, accumulated investments/reserves, Board-agreed commitments and a further distribution step through a CAF account. This establishes resource provision, not donor direction of every recipient policy or classification.\n\n## Legal actor and corporate authority\n\nThe current official governance footer identifies **Nominet UK, company 03203859**, a company limited by guarantee. Its public governance description reports more than 2,000 members; that is the organisation's current account, not an inspected membership register. Corporate members are not shareholders entitled to distributed profits. Governance page (see source references) substantive body and footer, read 9 September 2026.\n\nThe current-linked memorandum permits registry and related services and public-benefit contributions. Clause 3.12 authorizes donations, subscriptions, guarantees or free services for public, charitable or useful objects, with a political-party exclusion. Clause 6 directs income/capital to company objects and bars member profit distribution, subject to specified ordinary compensation/expense exceptions. This is a company constitution, not evidence that Nominet itself is a registered charity. Memorandum (see source references) PDF pages 1–4 and targeted 5–7, clauses 3.12, 6, 8–9. Adoption date not established; the URL's upload directory is not that date.\n\nThe current-linked articles, amended by special resolution **22 September 2020**, give members election rights for up to four non-executive directors; the Board can appoint additional non-executives and executives under separate provisions. Board-appointed non-executives must seek member reappointment by ordinary resolution at the following AGM and periodically thereafter (article 30); executive appointments remain a separate category. Articles 35–42 put management of affairs/property with the Board, provide meeting/quorum/conflict rules, and permit delegation to committees or executives on conditions the Board can change or revoke. These powers support a Board-budget authority path, not an identified vote approving the UKSIC grant. Articles (see source references) PDF pages 5–12, articles 19, 26–31 and 33–42. Registry-policy consultation under article 43 is not a general grant-approval consultation right.\n\nThe current-linked dated voting by-law allocates **25% of poll votes equally among members and 75% by paid-for domains associated with member tags**, with caps and connected-party rules. This makes commercial involvement relevant to constitutional/election voting; it does not establish a particular registrar's control of grant decisions. This is the linked 2012-file rule, not a reconstruction of every later ballot's applicable caps. No current member-weight register, decisive ballot or donor appointment instruction was acquired. Voting by-law (see source references) PDF pages 1–3, clauses 4.1–4.3, scoped text through line 82.\n\n## Dated financial path: year ended 31 March 2025\n\nGroup figures in the FY2025 report (see source references) registry revenue **£40.147m**, DNS revenue **£15.750m**, total **£55.897m** (PDF32). Registry is not necessarily exclusively .uk; recognized revenue is not cash receipts.\n\nThe 2021 commitment of **up to £65m** could use reserves **or annual surplus**. FY2025 trading operating profit was **£5.463m**; public-benefit expense was **£10.979m**. Investment assets were **£88.6m**. These are distinct flow/stock measures (PDF5–6,26).\n\nPublic-benefit expense comprised programme **£10.585m** and operating costs **£0.394m**. Programme spending included **£1.6m transferred to Nominet's CAF account** for onward distribution in FY2026/27. The grant table excludes that transfer and reports **UKSIC £1.647m**. Do not add the transfer again or equate expenses with beneficiary bank receipts (PDF6).\n\nThe former Public Benefit Committee's work moved to the main Board. Accounting policy recognizes public-benefit initiatives on an accrual basis against Board-agreed commitments; donations have a different paid-recipient recognition condition (PDF13,21). This establishes reported governance/accounting, not observed grant approval or completion.\n\n## Mechanism and competing interpretation\n\nThe supported path is **business income plus accumulated reserves → Nominet Board resource decisions → programme commitments/distribution arrangements → recipient work**. A second path is **commercially weighted member votes → some director appointments → Board oversight**. These should remain distinct: neither proves that large registrars ordered a specific grant or that receiving a grant surrendered editorial discretion.\n\nThe public constitution lets the Board delegate; it does not reveal whether a particular programme award required a Board vote, delegated approval or later amendments. Financial review and reported impact monitoring are also different from a contractual right to clear recipients' advocacy. Recipient autonomy remains a live alternative unless the actual instrument assigns such rights.\n\n## Limits, custody and next record\n\nThe annual-reports page now links **FY2026**. Its web reader rejected the PDF for size; the single ordinary public GET returned 403. It was not read. FY2025 is therefore a dated inspected financial snapshot, **not a claim about the latest balance sheet or current budget**.\n\nSeven ordinary GETs returned identical 403 error bodies. They are retained with hashes as access observations only. The constitution and FY2025 claims above come from inspected official web-reader text; no successful PDF-original bytes were retained in this lane. `donor-captures.json` records exact scopes, reader-only status and error-body custody. The already-read current landing links establish which older instruments the site presented, not that no later instrument exists.\n\nThe next discriminating records are the **current public-benefit budget/reserve policy and actual UKSIC award/renewal instrument or approval minute**, including delegated limits, payment schedule, reporting, termination and any policy-clearance clauses. Board powers and accounting categories alone do not answer those questions. No wider donor genealogy or operational registry inquiry was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery",
        "title": "Nominet resources: recipient accounts and delivery",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed after the two intended recipient accounts. All amounts below are GBP. This packet adds a recipient-side accounting and governance view; it does not establish bank receipts, a consortium allocation schedule or donor control over policy.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed after the two intended recipient accounts. All amounts below are GBP. This packet adds a recipient-side accounting and governance view; it does not establish bank receipts, a consortium allocation schedule or donor control over policy.</p>\n<p>The three charities&#x27; accounts all cover the year ended <strong>31 March 2025</strong>. Their UKSIC-related restricted income rows sum to <strong>£1,779,208</strong>, compared with Nominet&#x27;s <strong>£1,647,000</strong> UKSIC grants-table amount for the same year end. The <strong>£132,208 difference is unreconciled</strong>. It is not missing or diverted cash. The retained records give no bridge establishing identical coverage and recognition bases.</p>\n<h2 id=\"restricted-funds-attribution-and-the-comparison\">Restricted funds, attribution and the comparison</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Recipient and exact row</th>\n<th>FY2025 income</th>\n<th>FY2025 expenditure</th>\n<th>Transfer into fund</th>\n<th>FY2024 income</th>\n<th>Original locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>South West Grid for Learning Trust: Nominet Grant</td>\n<td>£773,395</td>\n<td>£773,395</td>\n<td>No transfer column; opening and closing balances zero</td>\n<td>£842,780</td>\n<td>Note 19, PDF 34–36 / printed 32–34</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Internet Watch Foundation: Nominet UKSIC</td>\n<td>£568,707</td>\n<td>£593,101</td>\n<td>£24,394</td>\n<td>£551,852</td>\n<td>Note 18a–c, PDF/printed 30–32; also Note 3, PDF 24</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Childnet: Nominet UKSIC 9</td>\n<td>£437,106</td>\n<td>£546,529</td>\n<td>£109,423</td>\n<td>£422,168</td>\n<td>Note 18, PDF 35–36 / printed 33–34</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Each of the three FY2025 rows has zero opening and closing fund balances. Those balances and recorded expenditure are not evidence that every deliverable was accepted or every payable settled. IWF explicitly explains that unrestricted funds covered the UKSIC deficit. Childnet shows a transfer into its UKSIC fund; the same table includes transfers into and out of several other funds, so the individual transfer should not be confused with its net general-fund movement of £107,192.</p>\n<p>The [SWGfL original](http[local research file] PDF 36, expressly identifies its Nominet fund as funding from Nominet for operating UKSIC with consortium members. This is separate from the same page&#x27;s Pershing/StopNCII purpose. Its PDF 22 recognition policy requires entitlement, performance conditions met, probable receipt and reliable measurement, with deferral where applicable.</p>\n<p>The [IWF original](http[local research file] Note 18c/PDF 32, explicitly describes its UKSIC fund as <strong>a grant from Nominet</strong> assisting Hotline running costs as part of UKSIC. Its attribution is therefore not inferred solely from a label. The same paragraph states that there are no unfulfilled conditions relating to amounts recognized that year. This is positive evidence at that recognition scope. It is not an inspected donor acceptance certificate, banking ledger or assurance that every obligation outside those recognized amounts was fulfilled. Notes 1d–e/PDF 21–22 recognize income when entitlement, relevant performance conditions, probable receipt and reliable measurement are satisfied; expenditure is accrued against obligations.</p>\n<p>The <a>Childnet original</a>.</p>\n<p>The donor comparison is taken from the parallel, reviewed <a href=\"/research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources\">donor-resources.md</a>: Nominet&#x27;s [FY2025 report](http[local research file] PDF 6 grants table, reports £1,647,000 for UKSIC and excludes the separate £1.6m transfer into Nominet&#x27;s CAF account for later distribution. The donor lane read the official web-reader text; no successful original PDF bytes were retained. This recipient worker read that scoped packet, not the donor original. Donor commitments/accrual policy, recipient recognition timing, award-period spillover, other income within a recipient fund or the donor table&#x27;s coverage are possible reconciliation questions, <strong>not established explanations</strong>. Matching year ends alone does not settle them.</p>\n<p>Other Nominet programmes remain separate. IWF Note 3/PDF 24 reports £226,352 of technical-project grant income; Note 18a/PDF 30 reports £226,351 for the corresponding technical fund. Both original tables were visually checked: the £1 discrepancy is retained without correction or an inferred cause. Neither amount belongs in the UKSIC comparison. Childnet&#x27;s separate Nominet Enhance fund has £11,783 income, £1,959 expenditure and £9,824 transferred out (PDF 35), also excluded from the UKSIC sum.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-disclosed-agreement-and-an-accountable-internal-route\">A disclosed agreement and an accountable internal route</h2>\n<p>Childnet&#x27;s trustees&#x27; report gives a concrete next instrument. PDF 12/printed 10 says it has a <strong>formal partnership agreement with SWGfL and IWF</strong> for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. The same page says trustees review and approve formal partnerships and major contractual relationships before signature. Day-to-day authority sits with the CEO and Business Manager under the annual business plan and budget, with payments above £3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls and an agreement-existence disclosure, not the agreement&#x27;s text, an observed approval minute or a Nominet reserved right.</p>\n<p>This complements the separate <a href=\"/research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards\">uksic-awards.md</a> finding from the [IWF Project Officer recruitment pack](http[local research file] PDF 7/printed 6: financial returns and reports through the UKSIC Secretariat, liaison with Nominet-identified evaluators/subcontractors, and internal progress reporting. That earlier operational role specification is not proof that a named person was appointed, that an evaluator accepted these FY2025 outputs or that the donor had publication clearance. No signed consortium/grant agreement, acceptance report, bespoke editorial condition or renewal schedule was acquired in this recipient pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"delivery-and-the-march-2025-boundary\">Delivery and the March 2025 boundary</h2>\n<p>Childnet reports Safer Internet Day on <strong>11 February 2025</strong>, over 1,700 registered supporting organisations, almost 160,000 educational-resource downloads and more than 86,000 quiz uses (PDF 8/printed 6). It explicitly credits Nominet support alongside other funders. This supports a reported delivery relationship, without attributing all outputs or costs exclusively to Nominet. The same page&#x27;s survey-evaluation prose mixes 2024 and 2025 references; its percentage results are not relied on here. The auditors&#x27; report, PDF 16–17/printed 14–15, gives the financial-statements opinion and expressly distinguishes other annual-report information, so the delivery narrative is not independently audited impact evidence.</p>\n<p>IWF&#x27;s trustees&#x27; report, PDF 7, attributes the IntelliGrade Multichild feature to Nominet-funded technology work and reports 70,898 children recorded during 2024 who would otherwise have gone unrecorded. This is an operator-reported counting capability/output; it is not a separately verified number of removals, and the inspected text does not assign this feature to the UKSIC Hotline grant rather than the separately described technical programme. This packet preserves that funding-purpose boundary.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"/research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards\">award packet</a> separately reads Nominet&#x27;s <a>2025 Impact Issue</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-finite-frontier\">Source custody and finite frontier</h2>\n<p>The newly retained IWF original has 34 PDF pages; SHA256 <strong>0f96cd95f93b3155cb46163dc64fe04604148d8a57e6d9f5e99c5459d465d433</strong>. Text read: PDF 1,7,9,16,17,21,22,24,30–32; PDF 24 and30–32 visually checked. Capture is not a full-document read.</p>\n<p>The newly retained Childnet original has 38 scanned PDF pages; SHA256 <strong>64a68bdf33c2ecdb9c36da5ae5c11c912b1b3079e7eb979d2623d7abe6e8506e</strong>. Full-size images read: PDF 2,5,6,8,9,11–14,16–17,23–24,26,33–36. The whole-document contact sheet was navigation only. Text extraction produced no substantive content; its headings-only derivative is excluded as evidence. Local rendering of retained bytes succeeded. The public Companies House overview identifies Childnet, company 03958416; the original notes identify charity 1080173. No officer/residential details were researched or included.</p>\n<p>The reused SWGfL original has SHA256 <strong>3dce487d6ef022565efc4d10e947ee4427c401edb7a3b056ef98b37cdfac96c5</strong> and remains in the prior stopncii-governance wave. This lane visually reread PDF 22 and34–36; prior wider scope remains in <a href=\"/research/stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources\">operator-resources.md</a>. No reacquisition or prior sidecar mutation was made. IWF is company 03426366; SWGfL is company 05589479. Exact original URLs, successful GET observations, hashes, scopes and derivative ancestry are in <a>recipient-captures.json</a>.</p>\n<p>Acquisition closed at the intended two new recipient records. Targeted primary searches and Companies House&#x27;s actual filing links were used. The Companies House overview&#x27;s failed web-reader method was replaced once with a successful ordinary public GET. Closed Nominet, oversized FY2026 and Charity Commission routes were not retried. No sign-in, form, outreach or paid route was used.</p>\n<p>The strongest next discriminator is the <strong>consortium partnership/grant agreement and the FY2025 donor-to-recipient reconciliation or financial return</strong>, held by the three recipient charities/UKSIC Secretariat and Nominet. These would distinguish allocation and timing from extra fund income and show actual reporting, acceptance or approval rights. The present record already establishes purpose restrictions, recipient expenditure, internal approval and reported delivery. It leaves donor direction of specific advocacy and the £132,208 accounting bridge unresolved. Recipient governance and contributions from other funds remain a defensible alternative to treating financing as an undifferentiated command relationship. No further branch was opened.</p>",
        "path": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09/recipient-delivery.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-childnet-accounts2025",
          "w28-access-s-childnet-identity",
          "w28-access-s-iwf-accounts2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed after the two intended recipient accounts. All amounts below are GBP. This packet adds a recipient-side accounting and governance view; it does not establish bank receipts, a consortium allocation schedule or donor control over policy.\n\nThe three charities' accounts all cover the year ended **31 March 2025**. Their UKSIC-related restricted income rows sum to **£1,779,208**, compared with Nominet's **£1,647,000** UKSIC grants-table amount for the same year end. The **£132,208 difference is unreconciled**. It is not missing or diverted cash. The retained records give no bridge establishing identical coverage and recognition bases.\n\n## Restricted funds, attribution and the comparison\n\n| Recipient and exact row | FY2025 income | FY2025 expenditure | Transfer into fund | FY2024 income | Original locator |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| South West Grid for Learning Trust: Nominet Grant | £773,395 | £773,395 | No transfer column; opening and closing balances zero | £842,780 | Note 19, PDF 34–36 / printed 32–34 |\n| Internet Watch Foundation: Nominet UKSIC | £568,707 | £593,101 | £24,394 | £551,852 | Note 18a–c, PDF/printed 30–32; also Note 3, PDF 24 |\n| Childnet: Nominet UKSIC 9 | £437,106 | £546,529 | £109,423 | £422,168 | Note 18, PDF 35–36 / printed 33–34 |\n\nEach of the three FY2025 rows has zero opening and closing fund balances. Those balances and recorded expenditure are not evidence that every deliverable was accepted or every payable settled. IWF explicitly explains that unrestricted funds covered the UKSIC deficit. Childnet shows a transfer into its UKSIC fund; the same table includes transfers into and out of several other funds, so the individual transfer should not be confused with its net general-fund movement of £107,192.\n\nThe SWGfL original (see source references) PDF 36, expressly identifies its Nominet fund as funding from Nominet for operating UKSIC with consortium members. This is separate from the same page's Pershing/StopNCII purpose. Its PDF 22 recognition policy requires entitlement, performance conditions met, probable receipt and reliable measurement, with deferral where applicable.\n\nThe IWF original (see source references) Note 18c/PDF 32, explicitly describes its UKSIC fund as **a grant from Nominet** assisting Hotline running costs as part of UKSIC. Its attribution is therefore not inferred solely from a label. The same paragraph states that there are no unfulfilled conditions relating to amounts recognized that year. This is positive evidence at that recognition scope. It is not an inspected donor acceptance certificate, banking ledger or assurance that every obligation outside those recognized amounts was fulfilled. Notes 1d–e/PDF 21–22 recognize income when entitlement, relevant performance conditions, probable receipt and reliable measurement are satisfied; expenditure is accrued against obligations.\n\nThe Childnet original.\n\nThe donor comparison is taken from the parallel, reviewed [donor-resources.md](nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-donor-resources.md): Nominet's FY2025 report (see source references) PDF 6 grants table, reports £1,647,000 for UKSIC and excludes the separate £1.6m transfer into Nominet's CAF account for later distribution. The donor lane read the official web-reader text; no successful original PDF bytes were retained. This recipient worker read that scoped packet, not the donor original. Donor commitments/accrual policy, recipient recognition timing, award-period spillover, other income within a recipient fund or the donor table's coverage are possible reconciliation questions, **not established explanations**. Matching year ends alone does not settle them.\n\nOther Nominet programmes remain separate. IWF Note 3/PDF 24 reports £226,352 of technical-project grant income; Note 18a/PDF 30 reports £226,351 for the corresponding technical fund. Both original tables were visually checked: the £1 discrepancy is retained without correction or an inferred cause. Neither amount belongs in the UKSIC comparison. Childnet's separate Nominet Enhance fund has £11,783 income, £1,959 expenditure and £9,824 transferred out (PDF 35), also excluded from the UKSIC sum.\n\n## A disclosed agreement and an accountable internal route\n\nChildnet's trustees' report gives a concrete next instrument. PDF 12/printed 10 says it has a **formal partnership agreement with SWGfL and IWF** for UKSIC projects now part-funded by Nominet. The same page says trustees review and approve formal partnerships and major contractual relationships before signature. Day-to-day authority sits with the CEO and Business Manager under the annual business plan and budget, with payments above £3,000 additionally authorized by the Chair. These are reported internal controls and an agreement-existence disclosure, not the agreement's text, an observed approval minute or a Nominet reserved right.\n\nThis complements the separate [uksic-awards.md](nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards.md) finding from the IWF Project Officer recruitment pack (see source references) PDF 7/printed 6: financial returns and reports through the UKSIC Secretariat, liaison with Nominet-identified evaluators/subcontractors, and internal progress reporting. That earlier operational role specification is not proof that a named person was appointed, that an evaluator accepted these FY2025 outputs or that the donor had publication clearance. No signed consortium/grant agreement, acceptance report, bespoke editorial condition or renewal schedule was acquired in this recipient pass.\n\n## Delivery and the March 2025 boundary\n\nChildnet reports Safer Internet Day on **11 February 2025**, over 1,700 registered supporting organisations, almost 160,000 educational-resource downloads and more than 86,000 quiz uses (PDF 8/printed 6). It explicitly credits Nominet support alongside other funders. This supports a reported delivery relationship, without attributing all outputs or costs exclusively to Nominet. The same page's survey-evaluation prose mixes 2024 and 2025 references; its percentage results are not relied on here. The auditors' report, PDF 16–17/printed 14–15, gives the financial-statements opinion and expressly distinguishes other annual-report information, so the delivery narrative is not independently audited impact evidence.\n\nIWF's trustees' report, PDF 7, attributes the IntelliGrade Multichild feature to Nominet-funded technology work and reports 70,898 children recorded during 2024 who would otherwise have gone unrecorded. This is an operator-reported counting capability/output; it is not a separately verified number of removals, and the inspected text does not assign this feature to the UKSIC Hotline grant rather than the separately described technical programme. This packet preserves that funding-purpose boundary.\n\nThe [award packet](nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards.md) separately reads Nominet's 2025 Impact Issue.\n\n## Source custody and finite frontier\n\nThe newly retained IWF original has 34 PDF pages; SHA256 **0f96cd95f93b3155cb46163dc64fe04604148d8a57e6d9f5e99c5459d465d433**. Text read: PDF 1,7,9,16,17,21,22,24,30–32; PDF 24 and30–32 visually checked. Capture is not a full-document read.\n\nThe newly retained Childnet original has 38 scanned PDF pages; SHA256 **64a68bdf33c2ecdb9c36da5ae5c11c912b1b3079e7eb979d2623d7abe6e8506e**. Full-size images read: PDF 2,5,6,8,9,11–14,16–17,23–24,26,33–36. The whole-document contact sheet was navigation only. Text extraction produced no substantive content; its headings-only derivative is excluded as evidence. Local rendering of retained bytes succeeded. The public Companies House overview identifies Childnet, company 03958416; the original notes identify charity 1080173. No officer/residential details were researched or included.\n\nThe reused SWGfL original has SHA256 **3dce487d6ef022565efc4d10e947ee4427c401edb7a3b056ef98b37cdfac96c5** and remains in the prior stopncii-governance wave. This lane visually reread PDF 22 and34–36; prior wider scope remains in [operator-resources.md](stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources.md). No reacquisition or prior sidecar mutation was made. IWF is company 03426366; SWGfL is company 05589479. Exact original URLs, successful GET observations, hashes, scopes and derivative ancestry are in recipient-captures.json.\n\nAcquisition closed at the intended two new recipient records. Targeted primary searches and Companies House's actual filing links were used. The Companies House overview's failed web-reader method was replaced once with a successful ordinary public GET. Closed Nominet, oversized FY2026 and Charity Commission routes were not retried. No sign-in, form, outreach or paid route was used.\n\nThe strongest next discriminator is the **consortium partnership/grant agreement and the FY2025 donor-to-recipient reconciliation or financial return**, held by the three recipient charities/UKSIC Secretariat and Nominet. These would distinguish allocation and timing from extra fund income and show actual reporting, acceptance or approval rights. The present record already establishes purpose restrictions, recipient expenditure, internal approval and reported delivery. It leaves donor direction of specific advocacy and the £132,208 accounting bridge unresolved. Recipient governance and contributions from other funds remain a defensible alternative to treating financing as an undifferentiated command relationship. No further branch was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-recipient-delivery.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards",
        "title": "Nominet → UK Safer Internet Centre: award, closure and later commissioned work",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded award/conditions lane, now closed. This packet does not replace donor governance or recipient accounts work. No case, renderer, ZIP, current-work or Explorer changes.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded award/conditions lane, now closed. This packet does not replace donor governance or recipient accounts work. No case, renderer, ZIP, current-work or Explorer changes.</p>\n<p>The public record separates a three-year programme from later support. Nominet announced a £5.1m pledge in October 2021; its 2025 retrospective says that grant ended in March. A subsequent named research commission includes disclosed donor input into study design. An early-2022 IWF role description also establishes a financial-reporting and evaluator-liaison structure. None of these records supplies an executed UKSIC grant agreement or general donor editorial veto.</p>\n<h2 id=\"amounts-and-instrument-boundaries\">Amounts and instrument boundaries</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record</th>\n<th>What it establishes</th>\n<th>What it does not establish</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Nominet announcement, 29 October 2021</td>\n<td>GBP5.1m pledged to help fund UKSIC over three years; intended to replace lost EU support. UKSIC comprises IWF, Childnet and SWGfL.</td>\n<td>Executed agreement, instalment schedule, precise commencement day, recipient allocation or completed payment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nominet announcement, 25 January 2022</td>\n<td>A GBP250,000 commitment for Safer Internet Day 2022, described as made before the October pledge.</td>\n<td>Payment, precise commitment day or a consolidated accounting reconciliation. Keep this named commitment separate; do not mechanically add it to annual UKSIC amounts.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nominet FY2024 summary, grants table</td>\n<td>UKSIC GBP1,599,000 for year ended31March2024, in a table of grants over£250k. IWF GBP250,000 is a separate row.</td>\n<td>SWGfL-only amount, three equal instalments, or a banking record showing the consortium allocation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FY2025 donor table supplied by parallel lane</td>\n<td>UKSIC GBP1,647,000; donor lane owns substantive accounts reading. This lane encountered the indexed table only.</td>\n<td>Independent full-original validation by this worker. Neither annual number should be added to the aggregate award as an additional award.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025 Impact Issue, PDF8/printed14–15</td>\n<td>Nominet reports the three-year grant ended in March and the partnership ended in its existing form, while committing to continued work/support. March2025 follows the edition context; no exact termination day asserted.</td>\n<td>Automatic renewal, total withdrawal of support, default/breach, or exercise of a contractual termination right.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Safer Internet Day2026 report</td>\n<td>A distinct Nominet-funded commission with disclosed design input and named research delivery.</td>\n<td>Amount, executed contract, cash dates, or proof this commission was an extension/drawdown of the £5.1m award.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The [2021 announcement](http[local research file] describes a pledge despite its headline saying the Centre receives funding. It also describes separate Childnet Digital Leaders+, SWGfL Project Evolve and IWF Countering Harm support. Those programmes cannot silently be included in the consortium allocation. The [January2022 announcement](http[local research file] distinguishes the earlier Safer Internet Day commitment. The [FY2024 summary](http[local research file] is a donor financial summary, not a recipient bank statement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reporting-and-selection-of-evaluators-a-public-operational-record\">Reporting and selection of evaluators: a public operational record</h2>\n<p>The retained [IWF Project Officer recruitment pack](http[local research file] contains a dedicated “Nominet grant for UK Safer Internet Centre” section at PDF7/printed6. The role is to communicate with Nominet and subcontractors it identifies, including evaluators; liaise with UKSIC partners, particularly the Secretariat, on financial returns/reports to Nominet; and coordinate IWF compliance with its obligations. Quarterly progress reports expressly go to IWF’s Senior Leadership Team. The neighbouring grant-management section describes internal monitoring/evaluation and approval by the Deputy CEO before new applications; those generic duties must not become bespoke Nominet contractual rights.</p>\n<p>This is stronger evidence than a logo: IWF publicly designed a role around grant communication and reporting, including funder-identified evaluators. It is still a recruitment specification, not an executed agreement, appointed-person record, named evaluator engagement, submitted report or evidence that Nominet accepted an output. No publication-clearance, withdrawal, clawback or renewal clause appears in the inspected job-description passages. PDF10/printed9 gives a closing date of11February2022; PDF metadata creation/modification is20January2022. These do not establish an exact public publication date or current staffing arrangement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"programme-end-continuing-support-and-disclosed-research-input\">Programme end, continuing support and disclosed research input</h2>\n<p>The [2025 retrospective](http[local research file] credited to Social Impact Lead Adam Groves, is explicit about the grant ending. It associates funding with Safer Internet Day, helplines, removal work and policy contributions, including the Online Safety Act and school-filtering standards. These are donor/recipient impact claims, not output-acceptance documents or independent evidence that funding caused particular legal changes. Their presence does not confer donor clearance authority.</p>\n<p>The [2026 report](http[local research file] says Nominet commissioned and funded the research; Childnet led study design with Nominet input; Opinium conducted surveys in November2025 of2,018 children and2,000 parents/carers. Childnet separately consulted youth groups in November–December2025 and ran school focus groups in May–June2025. This supports an attributed commissioning-and-design-input relation, with Childnet retaining the stated lead role. It does not establish which questions Nominet changed, a right of veto, or control over survey responses. The public report is a delivered publication, without a located contractual acceptance record. Its year is2026; the January URL directory is not an exact publication date. No survey-result validity audit was conducted.</p>\n<p>A [20December2024 parliamentary answer](http[local research file] to a question about support after March2025, promises continued government engagement toward sustainable funding. It is not a government funding award or underwriting commitment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-scope-and-custody\">Reading scope and custody</h2>\n<p>All acquisition ended after nine focused query strings and the decisive public records. Nominet original GET routes were already closed in the parallel donor lane; this worker made no Nominet GET or URL-variant retry. Nominet sources here are retained web-reader/search responses, not original HTML/PDF bytes, and their hashes must never be labelled original hashes. The 2025 Impact Issue screenshot returned an internal error. The2026 screenshot returned a reference without an image available for this worker to inspect; no visual verification claimed for either. The IWF ordinary public GET succeeded after its web reader failed; original bytes, derived text and the visually checked PDF7 image are retained.</p>\n<p>Actual source scopes:2021 announcement reader lines43–84 (complete article including notes);2022 announcement lines43–90 (complete article);2025 Impact Issue PDF8/printed14–15 complete two-page spread, plus foreword context PDF2;FY2024 summary PDF5 funding table and adjacent funding-account context in reader;2026 report cover, PDF2 commissioning/method paragraph and accompanying sample/context, PDF3–4 forewords; parliamentary question/answer lines17–39. IWF PDF1 and5–11 text read, decisive PDF7 visually checked; no claim to have read PDF2–4. Current Our Impact page was only partially inspected and supports no additional substantive proposition here. The February2024 Nominet blog reader failed; its search excerpt is retained as a lead only. Scope metadata and exact hashes are in uksic-awards-captures.json.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-gap-and-next-discriminator\">Finite gap and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>No executed grant, allocation schedule, amendment/renewal agreement, bespoke approval/clawback clause, named evaluator contract or delivered financial return was located in this pass. That is a bounded retrieval result, not proof no such conditions exist. Current DNS Fund application rules are a different instrument and were not imported into UKSIC grants.</p>\n<p>The most useful next record is the2021/2022 Nominet–UKSIC grant agreement and financial/reporting schedule, including any Secretariat administration arrangement and evaluator terms. Likely custodians are Nominet’s public-benefit team and the UKSIC Secretariat/three consortium charities. A second precise record is the2025/2026 Nominet–Childnet research brief or commissioning agreement: it would show whether disclosed design input was advisory, jointly agreed or backed by final approval. No outreach is authorised or undertaken. The local forest implication is a demonstrable funding-to-reporting/design route with a dated programme end, not an undifferentiated continuing donor command.</p>",
        "path": "nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09/uksic-awards.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-nominet-pledge2021",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-sid2022",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-summary2024",
          "w28-access-s-nominet-impact2025",
          "w28-access-s-sid-research2026",
          "w28-access-s-iwf-role2022"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded award/conditions lane, now closed. This packet does not replace donor governance or recipient accounts work. No case, renderer, ZIP, current-work or Explorer changes.\n\nThe public record separates a three-year programme from later support. Nominet announced a £5.1m pledge in October 2021; its 2025 retrospective says that grant ended in March. A subsequent named research commission includes disclosed donor input into study design. An early-2022 IWF role description also establishes a financial-reporting and evaluator-liaison structure. None of these records supplies an executed UKSIC grant agreement or general donor editorial veto.\n\n## Amounts and instrument boundaries\n\n| Record | What it establishes | What it does not establish |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Nominet announcement, 29 October 2021 | GBP5.1m pledged to help fund UKSIC over three years; intended to replace lost EU support. UKSIC comprises IWF, Childnet and SWGfL. | Executed agreement, instalment schedule, precise commencement day, recipient allocation or completed payment. |\n| Nominet announcement, 25 January 2022 | A GBP250,000 commitment for Safer Internet Day 2022, described as made before the October pledge. | Payment, precise commitment day or a consolidated accounting reconciliation. Keep this named commitment separate; do not mechanically add it to annual UKSIC amounts. |\n| Nominet FY2024 summary, grants table | UKSIC GBP1,599,000 for year ended31March2024, in a table of grants over£250k. IWF GBP250,000 is a separate row. | SWGfL-only amount, three equal instalments, or a banking record showing the consortium allocation. |\n| FY2025 donor table supplied by parallel lane | UKSIC GBP1,647,000; donor lane owns substantive accounts reading. This lane encountered the indexed table only. | Independent full-original validation by this worker. Neither annual number should be added to the aggregate award as an additional award. |\n| 2025 Impact Issue, PDF8/printed14–15 | Nominet reports the three-year grant ended in March and the partnership ended in its existing form, while committing to continued work/support. March2025 follows the edition context; no exact termination day asserted. | Automatic renewal, total withdrawal of support, default/breach, or exercise of a contractual termination right. |\n| Safer Internet Day2026 report | A distinct Nominet-funded commission with disclosed design input and named research delivery. | Amount, executed contract, cash dates, or proof this commission was an extension/drawdown of the £5.1m award. |\n\nThe 2021 announcement (see source references) describes a pledge despite its headline saying the Centre receives funding. It also describes separate Childnet Digital Leaders+, SWGfL Project Evolve and IWF Countering Harm support. Those programmes cannot silently be included in the consortium allocation. The January2022 announcement (see source references) distinguishes the earlier Safer Internet Day commitment. The FY2024 summary (see source references) is a donor financial summary, not a recipient bank statement.\n\n## Reporting and selection of evaluators: a public operational record\n\nThe retained IWF Project Officer recruitment pack (see source references) contains a dedicated “Nominet grant for UK Safer Internet Centre” section at PDF7/printed6. The role is to communicate with Nominet and subcontractors it identifies, including evaluators; liaise with UKSIC partners, particularly the Secretariat, on financial returns/reports to Nominet; and coordinate IWF compliance with its obligations. Quarterly progress reports expressly go to IWF’s Senior Leadership Team. The neighbouring grant-management section describes internal monitoring/evaluation and approval by the Deputy CEO before new applications; those generic duties must not become bespoke Nominet contractual rights.\n\nThis is stronger evidence than a logo: IWF publicly designed a role around grant communication and reporting, including funder-identified evaluators. It is still a recruitment specification, not an executed agreement, appointed-person record, named evaluator engagement, submitted report or evidence that Nominet accepted an output. No publication-clearance, withdrawal, clawback or renewal clause appears in the inspected job-description passages. PDF10/printed9 gives a closing date of11February2022; PDF metadata creation/modification is20January2022. These do not establish an exact public publication date or current staffing arrangement.\n\n## Programme end, continuing support and disclosed research input\n\nThe 2025 retrospective (see source references) credited to Social Impact Lead Adam Groves, is explicit about the grant ending. It associates funding with Safer Internet Day, helplines, removal work and policy contributions, including the Online Safety Act and school-filtering standards. These are donor/recipient impact claims, not output-acceptance documents or independent evidence that funding caused particular legal changes. Their presence does not confer donor clearance authority.\n\nThe 2026 report (see source references) says Nominet commissioned and funded the research; Childnet led study design with Nominet input; Opinium conducted surveys in November2025 of2,018 children and2,000 parents/carers. Childnet separately consulted youth groups in November–December2025 and ran school focus groups in May–June2025. This supports an attributed commissioning-and-design-input relation, with Childnet retaining the stated lead role. It does not establish which questions Nominet changed, a right of veto, or control over survey responses. The public report is a delivered publication, without a located contractual acceptance record. Its year is2026; the January URL directory is not an exact publication date. No survey-result validity audit was conducted.\n\nA 20December2024 parliamentary answer (see source references) to a question about support after March2025, promises continued government engagement toward sustainable funding. It is not a government funding award or underwriting commitment.\n\n## Reading scope and custody\n\nAll acquisition ended after nine focused query strings and the decisive public records. Nominet original GET routes were already closed in the parallel donor lane; this worker made no Nominet GET or URL-variant retry. Nominet sources here are retained web-reader/search responses, not original HTML/PDF bytes, and their hashes must never be labelled original hashes. The 2025 Impact Issue screenshot returned an internal error. The2026 screenshot returned a reference without an image available for this worker to inspect; no visual verification claimed for either. The IWF ordinary public GET succeeded after its web reader failed; original bytes, derived text and the visually checked PDF7 image are retained.\n\nActual source scopes:2021 announcement reader lines43–84 (complete article including notes);2022 announcement lines43–90 (complete article);2025 Impact Issue PDF8/printed14–15 complete two-page spread, plus foreword context PDF2;FY2024 summary PDF5 funding table and adjacent funding-account context in reader;2026 report cover, PDF2 commissioning/method paragraph and accompanying sample/context, PDF3–4 forewords; parliamentary question/answer lines17–39. IWF PDF1 and5–11 text read, decisive PDF7 visually checked; no claim to have read PDF2–4. Current Our Impact page was only partially inspected and supports no additional substantive proposition here. The February2024 Nominet blog reader failed; its search excerpt is retained as a lead only. Scope metadata and exact hashes are in uksic-awards-captures.json.\n\n## Finite gap and next discriminator\n\nNo executed grant, allocation schedule, amendment/renewal agreement, bespoke approval/clawback clause, named evaluator contract or delivered financial return was located in this pass. That is a bounded retrieval result, not proof no such conditions exist. Current DNS Fund application rules are a different instrument and were not imported into UKSIC grants.\n\nThe most useful next record is the2021/2022 Nominet–UKSIC grant agreement and financial/reporting schedule, including any Secretariat administration arrangement and evaluator terms. Likely custodians are Nominet’s public-benefit team and the UKSIC Secretariat/three consortium charities. A second precise record is the2025/2026 Nominet–Childnet research brief or commissioning agreement: it would show whether disclosed design input was advisory, jointly agreed or backed by final approval. No outreach is authorised or undertaken. The local forest implication is a demonstrable funding-to-reporting/design route with a dated programme end, not an undifferentiated continuing donor command.\n",
        "file": "research/nominet-resources-wave-2026-09-09-uksic-awards.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support",
        "title": "Oak support for Check My Ads: a verified grant, bounded terms",
        "description": "Closed acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet uses donor records and one already recipient record. It does not establish an executed CMA agreement or a payment receipt.",
        "html": "<p>Closed acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet uses donor records and one already retained recipient record. It does not establish an executed CMA agreement or a payment receipt.</p>\n<p>Oak&#x27;s own <strong>2025 Annual Report, PDF/printed page 24</strong>, lists <strong>Check My Ads — USD 600,000 (3 years)</strong>. The purpose is core support for greater transparency and fairness in digital advertising. It appears in the International Human Rights programme. The annual report presents its list as 2025 grant-making; the amount is the listed three-year grant, not an annual amount or evidence that $600,000 reached CMA in 2025. Exact approval, start, end and instalment dates are absent from this entry. [Current donor original](http[local research file] retained as <code>oak-annual2025-current.pdf</code>; visual check <code>oak-annual2025-current-p24.png</code>.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Field</th>\n<th>Supported reading</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Public grantor attribution</td>\n<td>Oak Foundation. The report&#x27;s page 4 describes a group of philanthropic organisations; it does not identify which legal entity executed this grant.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Recipient as printed</td>\n<td>Check My Ads. This row supplies no legal suffix, EIN or registered address. Do not silently expand it to a verified contracting entity.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Amount and duration</td>\n<td>USD 600,000 over a reported three-year grant. No per-year allocation or payment schedule is given.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Resource classification</td>\n<td>Donor-reported core-support grant in its 2025 report. Cash disbursement and recipient recognition remain unverified.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Specific campaign allocation</td>\n<td>None disclosed in the grant entry. No link to the February 2025 Senate letters or the Ofcom submission is established by this record.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The currently linked report has production metadata dated 20 March 2026 and modification metadata dated 3 June 2026. These are file-production dates, not the exact date it became public or the date of grant approval. Its page 6 reports grants made; pages 6–7 do not supply a CMA payment reconciliation. Pages 8–9 discuss general support, evaluation and reporting, including selected pilots; they do not disclose CMA-specific reporting terms.</p>\n<p>Source reuse: root checked the current case and identified this exact application guide as existing source <code>w3-oak-grant-process</code>, with the same URL and SHA-256. Its senior-decision role (<code>w3-oak-senior-decision</code>) and generic decision/letter relation already exist. This capture adds a current-link observation and scoped reread, not an independent corroborating source or a newly discovered approval mechanism. The new extension is the CMA grant.</p>\n<p>The general process reveals where decisions occur. In the currently linked [application guide](http[local research file] PDF pages 2–3, programme officers screen strategic fit and work with applicants. Staff, leadership and trustees may assess an early concept; a complete application is reviewed by the programme officer, finance team, programme director and possibly an external reviewer. The programme officer recommends a funding decision to senior foundation members. On approval, the guide describes a grant letter reviewed and signed by both parties, followed by a bank wire. Its timelines are approximate. This is a public description of a process, <strong>not proof that this particular letter was signed, what it required, or when a payment occurred</strong>. The guide&#x27;s metadata dates to 28 November 2019; its continuing public link was observed on 9 September 2026. Original: <code>oak-application-guide.pdf</code>, all three pages read; page 3 visually checked in <code>oak-application-guide-p3.png</code>.</p>\n<p>The live [grant-making page](http[local research file] describes recipients setting their priorities and Oak matching existing goals to its programmes, using flexible project funding or core support. Renewals are described as separate grants. The current [FAQ](http[local research file] especially “About” questions 4–9, “Grant-making” questions 1–2, “Due diligence and review,” and “What Oak Foundation does not fund” questions 4 and 6, says core support is unrestricted and recipients direct their work. It also identifies financial, safeguarding and internal-control review, continued discussion during grants, and exclusions for election campaigns or party-affiliated political activity. These are current public policies, not recovered historical CMA contractual clauses. The general 20% organisational / 50% project support norms allow exceptions and cannot establish CMA&#x27;s budget, Oak&#x27;s share of it, or a three-year grant&#x27;s annual allocation.</p>\n<p>The strongest defensible mechanism is <strong>resource selection and sustained organisational capacity</strong>, with donor screening and an expected agreement, alongside an express public policy of recipient independence. That is stronger than a mere donor-roster association. It still does not show Oak chose CMA&#x27;s targets, approved particular submissions, or purchased outcomes. The rival explanation supported by the public policies is that Oak selected an independently directed organisation already pursuing aligned goals. The decisive evidence needed to distinguish more specific conditions is the <strong>CMA grant letter and incorporated application, budget, reporting schedule and amendments</strong>, together with payment/recognition records. These were not acquired; the generic workflow only identifies the likely instrument.</p>\n<p>For historical context, CMA&#x27;s retained 2025 annual report, PDF35, labels foundation grants as <strong>82.8%</strong> of funding. That chart is not a dollar denominator for this three-year Oak amount and does not reconcile an Oak payment. Reused original: <code>../cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09/cma-annual2025.pdf</code>, page 35 text read in this lane; root previously visually checked the chart. [Recipient report](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Source custody and finite frontier: the initially indexed March-path PDF returned 404 through the official reader and one ordinary GET; that route is closed. Its error body is preserved separately. Oak&#x27;s actual homepage then supplied a different current June-path PDF link, which was captured successfully. This was an observed publisher link, not a guessed filename retry. The [latest-grants page](http[local research file] directs readers to the annual report while a new database is being prepared; no database or application system was queried. The FAQ, grant-making page and linked guide were read for the applicable public framework; no extra branding, safeguarding-policy or family-history branch was pursued.</p>\n<p><code>oak-captures.json</code> records exact URLs, acquisition times where retained, SHA-256 hashes, ancestry and reading scope. The 60-page report was captured and text-extracted in full, but substantive reading was scoped to PDF1, 3–9, 22 and 24, with page 5 partial and page 24 visual. Other pages were not silently promoted to read evidence. Originals and derivative files remain distinct. No new graph, current-work, forest, presentation or package changes were made. Acquisition is closed pending root review.</p>",
        "path": "oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09/oak-support.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5046aaa630e7"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed acquisition: 9 September 2026. This packet uses donor records and one already retained recipient record. It does not establish an executed CMA agreement or a payment receipt.\n\nOak's own **2025 Annual Report, PDF/printed page 24**, lists **Check My Ads — USD 600,000 (3 years)**. The purpose is core support for greater transparency and fairness in digital advertising. It appears in the International Human Rights programme. The annual report presents its list as 2025 grant-making; the amount is the listed three-year grant, not an annual amount or evidence that $600,000 reached CMA in 2025. Exact approval, start, end and instalment dates are absent from this entry. Current donor original (see source references) retained as `oak-annual2025-current.pdf`; visual check `oak-annual2025-current-p24.png`.\n\n| Field | Supported reading |\n| --- | --- |\n| Public grantor attribution | Oak Foundation. The report's page 4 describes a group of philanthropic organisations; it does not identify which legal entity executed this grant. |\n| Recipient as printed | Check My Ads. This row supplies no legal suffix, EIN or registered address. Do not silently expand it to a verified contracting entity. |\n| Amount and duration | USD 600,000 over a reported three-year grant. No per-year allocation or payment schedule is given. |\n| Resource classification | Donor-reported core-support grant in its 2025 report. Cash disbursement and recipient recognition remain unverified. |\n| Specific campaign allocation | None disclosed in the grant entry. No link to the February 2025 Senate letters or the Ofcom submission is established by this record. |\n\nThe currently linked report has production metadata dated 20 March 2026 and modification metadata dated 3 June 2026. These are file-production dates, not the exact date it became public or the date of grant approval. Its page 6 reports grants made; pages 6–7 do not supply a CMA payment reconciliation. Pages 8–9 discuss general support, evaluation and reporting, including selected pilots; they do not disclose CMA-specific reporting terms.\n\nSource reuse: root checked the current case and identified this exact application guide as existing source `w3-oak-grant-process`, with the same URL and SHA-256. Its senior-decision role (`w3-oak-senior-decision`) and generic decision/letter relation already exist. This capture adds a current-link observation and scoped reread, not an independent corroborating source or a newly discovered approval mechanism. The new extension is the CMA grant.\n\nThe general process reveals where decisions occur. In the currently linked application guide (see source references) PDF pages 2–3, programme officers screen strategic fit and work with applicants. Staff, leadership and trustees may assess an early concept; a complete application is reviewed by the programme officer, finance team, programme director and possibly an external reviewer. The programme officer recommends a funding decision to senior foundation members. On approval, the guide describes a grant letter reviewed and signed by both parties, followed by a bank wire. Its timelines are approximate. This is a public description of a process, **not proof that this particular letter was signed, what it required, or when a payment occurred**. The guide's metadata dates to 28 November 2019; its continuing public link was observed on 9 September 2026. Original: `oak-application-guide.pdf`, all three pages read; page 3 visually checked in `oak-application-guide-p3.png`.\n\nThe live grant-making page (see source references) describes recipients setting their priorities and Oak matching existing goals to its programmes, using flexible project funding or core support. Renewals are described as separate grants. The current FAQ (see source references) especially “About” questions 4–9, “Grant-making” questions 1–2, “Due diligence and review,” and “What Oak Foundation does not fund” questions 4 and 6, says core support is unrestricted and recipients direct their work. It also identifies financial, safeguarding and internal-control review, continued discussion during grants, and exclusions for election campaigns or party-affiliated political activity. These are current public policies, not recovered historical CMA contractual clauses. The general 20% organisational / 50% project support norms allow exceptions and cannot establish CMA's budget, Oak's share of it, or a three-year grant's annual allocation.\n\nThe strongest defensible mechanism is **resource selection and sustained organisational capacity**, with donor screening and an expected agreement, alongside an express public policy of recipient independence. That is stronger than a mere donor-roster association. It still does not show Oak chose CMA's targets, approved particular submissions, or purchased outcomes. The rival explanation supported by the public policies is that Oak selected an independently directed organisation already pursuing aligned goals. The decisive evidence needed to distinguish more specific conditions is the **CMA grant letter and incorporated application, budget, reporting schedule and amendments**, together with payment/recognition records. These were not acquired; the generic workflow only identifies the likely instrument.\n\nFor historical context, CMA's retained 2025 annual report, PDF35, labels foundation grants as **82.8%** of funding. That chart is not a dollar denominator for this three-year Oak amount and does not reconcile an Oak payment. Reused original: `../cma-danish-support-wave-2026-09-09/cma-annual2025.pdf`, page 35 text read in this lane; root previously visually checked the chart. Recipient report (see source references)\n\nSource custody and finite frontier: the initially indexed March-path PDF returned 404 through the official reader and one ordinary GET; that route is closed. Its error body is preserved separately. Oak's actual homepage then supplied a different current June-path PDF link, which was captured successfully. This was an observed publisher link, not a guessed filename retry. The latest-grants page (see source references) directs readers to the annual report while a new database is being prepared; no database or application system was queried. The FAQ, grant-making page and linked guide were read for the applicable public framework; no extra branding, safeguarding-policy or family-history branch was pursued.\n\n`oak-captures.json` records exact URLs, acquisition times where retained, SHA-256 hashes, ancestry and reading scope. The 60-page report was captured and text-extracted in full, but substantive reading was scoped to PDF1, 3–9, 22 and 24, with page 5 partial and page 24 visual. Other pages were not silently promoted to read evidence. Originals and derivative files remain distinct. No new graph, current-work, forest, presentation or package changes were made. Acquisition is closed pending root review.\n",
        "file": "research/oak-cma-support-wave-2026-09-09-oak-support.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence",
        "title": "DFF supports a specific limit on compelled encryption access",
        "description": "Bounded acquisition closed on 9 September 2026 after two DFF primary records. Both are DFF's own accounts, not independent court records or a recipient payment receipt.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded acquisition closed on 9 September 2026 after two DFF primary records. Both are DFF&#x27;s own accounts, not independent court records or a recipient payment receipt.</p>\n<p>DFF&#x27;s [18 August 2026 grant announcement](http[local research file] names Liberty&#x27;s challenge to the UK government forcing Apple to break encryption among grants approved in June 2026. It attributes application review and grant selection to an external Community Peer Group, which it says has made these decisions since 2025. This establishes a reported intermediate allocation decision: Oak&#x27;s support for DFF does not become direct Oak authorship of Liberty&#x27;s litigation. The announcement gives a round total of EUR 500,000 for 16 grants; that total must not be assigned to Liberty. Retained original: <code>dff-grants2026.html</code>; full substantive text read in <code>dff-grants2026.derived.txt</code>. Decisive official-reader locators: lines 9–18 and 37–41.</p>\n<p>The announcement&#x27;s actual Liberty link opens [DFF&#x27;s encryption case study](http[local research file] Its principal organisation field names Liberty, with <strong>EUR 36,000</strong>, <strong>Litigation Track Support</strong>, and <strong>Ongoing</strong> status. DFF describes Liberty seeking a ruling that the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 Technical Capability Notice regime breaches rights, preventing similar future notices. Its stated strategic objective is to protect end-to-end encryption and resist government attempts to undermine it. This is a concrete challenge to a coercive power, rather than generic privacy language. It is Liberty&#x27;s described legal action, funded by DFF; neither DFF nor Oak should be substituted as the claimant or author. Retained original: <code>dff-liberty-tcn.html</code>; full substantive text read in <code>dff-liberty-tcn.derived.txt</code>. Decisive reader locators: lines 3–9, 12–26, 30–46.</p>\n<p>The source&#x27;s current label is a reported ongoing case, not a verified court result. Its account of Apple&#x27;s notices and proceedings explicitly uses reported or alleged descriptions. No notice, pleading, judgment or payment record was read in this lane. The grant amount is not a cash-transfer finding. The dated announcement places the linked project in a June 2026 approval round; the case page does not disclose a precise award date, term, instalments, reporting conditions or signed agreement.</p>\n<p>There is one source defect worth preserving: after its Liberty description and related links, the case page repeats an “Organisation Name” label followed by “Women’s Link Worldwide.” This appears in both the original HTML and the reader (lines 52–54). The main organisation field, repeated body and separate grant announcement all identify Liberty. The trailing inconsistent label is not evidence of an additional recipient or co-claimant, and its cause was not established. It remains an explicit metadata anomaly rather than a silently repaired field.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes-in-the-network-interpretation\">What this changes in the network interpretation</h2>\n<p>The evidence supplies a specific counterweight to an inference that shared foundation funding entails uniform support for expanding state access: DFF reports supporting litigation aimed at disabling a UK power to compel interference with encryption. Oak&#x27;s separately reviewed core support for DFF does not establish an earmark for this grant, a traced payment chain, or the purchase of opposition.</p>\n<p>It does <strong>not</strong> yet prove a direct disagreement with 5Rights, WeProtect or Check My Ads over the same instrument. The challenged power is an IPA Technical Capability Notice, not the Online Safety Act&#x27;s age-assurance rules or CMA&#x27;s monetisation proposal. Protection of encryption can coexist with other online-safety duties; the case does not establish a position against all age verification. To claim a direct policy clash, the next discriminating evidence would be the actual positions of both sides on the same power. No such additional branch was opened here.</p>\n<p>Likewise, the reported Community Peer Group decision should be kept separate from a claim that it possesses final legal execution authority or that DFF/Oak have no reserved rights. Its charter, appointment rules and the Liberty grant agreement were not read. The source supports the stated selection role, not an invented complete governance settlement.</p>\n<p>For later integration, useful relationships are DFF → Liberty (reported EUR 36,000 litigation support), Community Peer Group → the June 2026 grant selection (DFF-attributed decision), and Liberty → the UK TCN regime (reported rights challenge). None is a payment-to-Apple edge or proof of a successful judgment. The exact Oak → DFF donor instrument remains with the root&#x27;s donor lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-stopping-point\">Custody and stopping point</h2>\n<p>The two HTML originals were obtained with one successful ordinary GET each on 9 September 2026, after substantive official-reader access. No failure workaround or gated system was needed. <code>dff-captures.json</code> contains exact URLs, timestamps, hashes, query scope and limitations. Source texts were retained in full; the notes rely on the relevant passages identified above. The Community Peer Group governance page, linked Liberty article and other projects were discovered but not opened. This finite pass did not establish a direct DFF intervention against UK age-assurance duties; that is a limit of this selected reading, not proof none exists.</p>\n<p>The most useful missing record is Liberty&#x27;s actual TCN pleading or a published judgment, to verify the pleaded scope and adjudicated result; a specific grant agreement would separately test allocation and reporting conditions. No further acquisition, graph, forest, current-work, visual or package change was undertaken.</p>",
        "path": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09/dff-divergence.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-dffround",
          "w31-fa-s-dffliberty"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded acquisition closed on 9 September 2026 after two DFF primary records. Both are DFF's own accounts, not independent court records or a recipient payment receipt.\n\nDFF's 18 August 2026 grant announcement (see source references) names Liberty's challenge to the UK government forcing Apple to break encryption among grants approved in June 2026. It attributes application review and grant selection to an external Community Peer Group, which it says has made these decisions since 2025. This establishes a reported intermediate allocation decision: Oak's support for DFF does not become direct Oak authorship of Liberty's litigation. The announcement gives a round total of EUR 500,000 for 16 grants; that total must not be assigned to Liberty. Retained original: `dff-grants2026.html`; full substantive text read in `dff-grants2026.derived.txt`. Decisive official-reader locators: lines 9–18 and 37–41.\n\nThe announcement's actual Liberty link opens DFF's encryption case study (see source references) Its principal organisation field names Liberty, with **EUR 36,000**, **Litigation Track Support**, and **Ongoing** status. DFF describes Liberty seeking a ruling that the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 Technical Capability Notice regime breaches rights, preventing similar future notices. Its stated strategic objective is to protect end-to-end encryption and resist government attempts to undermine it. This is a concrete challenge to a coercive power, rather than generic privacy language. It is Liberty's described legal action, funded by DFF; neither DFF nor Oak should be substituted as the claimant or author. Retained original: `dff-liberty-tcn.html`; full substantive text read in `dff-liberty-tcn.derived.txt`. Decisive reader locators: lines 3–9, 12–26, 30–46.\n\nThe source's current label is a reported ongoing case, not a verified court result. Its account of Apple's notices and proceedings explicitly uses reported or alleged descriptions. No notice, pleading, judgment or payment record was read in this lane. The grant amount is not a cash-transfer finding. The dated announcement places the linked project in a June 2026 approval round; the case page does not disclose a precise award date, term, instalments, reporting conditions or signed agreement.\n\nThere is one source defect worth preserving: after its Liberty description and related links, the case page repeats an “Organisation Name” label followed by “Women’s Link Worldwide.” This appears in both the original HTML and the reader (lines 52–54). The main organisation field, repeated body and separate grant announcement all identify Liberty. The trailing inconsistent label is not evidence of an additional recipient or co-claimant, and its cause was not established. It remains an explicit metadata anomaly rather than a silently repaired field.\n\n## What this changes in the network interpretation\n\nThe evidence supplies a specific counterweight to an inference that shared foundation funding entails uniform support for expanding state access: DFF reports supporting litigation aimed at disabling a UK power to compel interference with encryption. Oak's separately reviewed core support for DFF does not establish an earmark for this grant, a traced payment chain, or the purchase of opposition.\n\nIt does **not** yet prove a direct disagreement with 5Rights, WeProtect or Check My Ads over the same instrument. The challenged power is an IPA Technical Capability Notice, not the Online Safety Act's age-assurance rules or CMA's monetisation proposal. Protection of encryption can coexist with other online-safety duties; the case does not establish a position against all age verification. To claim a direct policy clash, the next discriminating evidence would be the actual positions of both sides on the same power. No such additional branch was opened here.\n\nLikewise, the reported Community Peer Group decision should be kept separate from a claim that it possesses final legal execution authority or that DFF/Oak have no reserved rights. Its charter, appointment rules and the Liberty grant agreement were not read. The source supports the stated selection role, not an invented complete governance settlement.\n\nFor later integration, useful relationships are DFF → Liberty (reported EUR 36,000 litigation support), Community Peer Group → the June 2026 grant selection (DFF-attributed decision), and Liberty → the UK TCN regime (reported rights challenge). None is a payment-to-Apple edge or proof of a successful judgment. The exact Oak → DFF donor instrument remains with the root's donor lane.\n\n## Custody and stopping point\n\nThe two HTML originals were obtained with one successful ordinary GET each on 9 September 2026, after substantive official-reader access. No failure workaround or gated system was needed. `dff-captures.json` contains exact URLs, timestamps, hashes, query scope and limitations. Source texts were retained in full; the notes rely on the relevant passages identified above. The Community Peer Group governance page, linked Liberty article and other projects were discovered but not opened. This finite pass did not establish a direct DFF intervention against UK age-assurance duties; that is a limit of this selected reading, not proof none exists.\n\nThe most useful missing record is Liberty's actual TCN pleading or a published judgment, to verify the pleaded scope and adjudicated result; a specific grant agreement would separately test allocation and reporting conditions. No further acquisition, graph, forest, current-work, visual or package change was undertaken.\n",
        "file": "research/oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-dff-divergence.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence",
        "title": "Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition closed. This lane compares named donor grants with actions by their recipients; it does not claim a grant paid for a particular action. The Digital Freedom Fund lane is separate.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root acquisition closed. This lane compares named donor grants with actions by their recipients; it does not claim a grant paid for a particular action. The Digital Freedom Fund lane is separate.</p>\n<p>Oak&#x27;s retained 2025 Annual Report, PDF/printed25, lists Statewatch USD303622 over three years for news, information and analysis on EU spending and justice/home-affairs practice. It lists Digital Freedom Fund USD631579 over three years in core support for the European digital-rights community. Root read PDF22–26 and visually checked the complete page25 columns. These are reported grant amounts and durations; exact contracting entities, start/end dates, payment timing and conditions are absent. The Statewatch entry does not say unrestricted core support. [Donor report](http[local research file] is reused from the preceding Oak packet, not a second confirmation.</p>\n<p>The same donor&#x27;s current International Human Rights programme sets priorities that include reliable information, media pluralism, an open and accountable digital sphere, and protection for human-rights defenders. It explicitly allows intermediary organisations in some geographies. This provides a programme-level rationale that could accommodate watchdogs and opponents of excessive surveillance. It supplies no specific grant-approval chain or direction to Statewatch. Root read the complete substantive programme section in the official reader and retained original HTML. [Programme](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-documented-opposing-position-on-the-eu-proposal\">A documented opposing position on the EU proposal</h2>\n<p>Statewatch&#x27;s dated 13 September 2023 statement identifies itself as a signatory to an EDRi-coordinated call for EU governments to reject the proposed Child Sexual Abuse Regulation until it protects rights and security. The statement objects to blanket scanning of private communications and potential ID checks, on privacy, encryption and exclusion grounds. Those are the signatories&#x27; claims about the then proposal; this comparison does not independently resolve every legal or technical assertion or establish the current 2026 text. [Signed statement](http[local research file] Root read the substantive statement and signatory list, including Statewatch. It predates the 2025 grant: the later grant cannot explain the origin of this 2023 position.</p>\n<p>For the comparator, root refreshed existing case source src-12639f108d96 and read all four pages of the WeProtect Secretariat&#x27;s original EC consultation submission. It strongly supports the legislative initiative, mandatory detection obligations and a new EU centre, alongside safeguards, constrained information extraction, oversight and classification standards. It also expresses interest in collaborating with the proposed centre. The undated document gives membership figures as of 12 September 2022; this is not an exact submission date. PDF4 explicitly separates Secretariat views from members&#x27; positions. [Submission](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>These are different positions on the same legislative initiative at different dates, with potentially different draft versions. Both invoke rights and safeguards; they disagree over whether the proposed detection regime merits support. Do not turn this into a vote on identical final clauses, a position held by every WeProtect member, or proof Oak financed opposition and support simultaneously. Current case relationship n25 already records the supporting submission; the fresh original improves its source custody. The imported source&#x27;s access_state had remained discovered despite the relationship&#x27;s historical read note; this new scoped reread supplies explicit current evidence for later integration.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-direct-uk-intervention-seeking-limits-and-remedies\">A direct UK intervention seeking limits and remedies</h2>\n<p>Statewatch also signed an Open Rights Group-coordinated letter to Ofcom, Meta, Alphabet, X and ByteDance, dated 4 August 2025 on the signatory publisher&#x27;s page. The retained five-page PDF identifies ORG on its letterhead and Statewatch on PDF5. It seeks clarification and safeguards against over-removing lawful political expression under the OSA following Palestine Action&#x27;s proscription: clear guidance, transparency, impact assessment, appeal/restoration processes, conditional independent dispute resolution, and clarity on global versus UK removal. These are requested protections, not demonstrated remedies or acquired regulatory commitments. [Publisher&#x27;s letter page](http[local research file] [attached PDF](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Root read the whole PDF and substantive HTML, and visually checked PDF5. Its characterisations of legal powers, particular detentions and the regulator&#x27;s bypass strategy remain attributed assertions here; no independent legal/current-proscription audit was performed. The PDF itself has no extracted date; the date comes from the publisher. The 2026/04 URL path is a hosting path, not the letter date. The PDF lists D3 Portugal, absent from the current page&#x27;s signatory text, so do not claim exact signatory-list identity. Statewatch appears in both. No sent-mail evidence, recipient reply or implemented correction was acquired. The date coincides with the separately evidenced DSIT/Ofcom meeting; a shared date alone supplies no connection between that meeting and this letter.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-comparison-can-establish\">What the comparison can establish</h2>\n<p>A common Oak funding node connects organisations that have publicly advocated different boundaries on digital power. This supports a model with recipient agency, differing programme objectives and contest over implementation. It weakens a uniform-policy inference from shared funding alone. It neither erases selection/renewal leverage nor proves all recipients independent in every decision. Statewatch&#x27;s UK letter is critical engagement seeking constrained enforcement and remedies, not evidence it rejects all online-safety regulation or every form of age assurance. The sharper questions are which decisions a funder can approve, which decisions intermediaries allocate elsewhere, and whose proposed controls are actually adopted.</p>\n<p>Finite acquisition: two Statewatch intervention records and one already-cited WeProtect comparator. The Statewatch month-index reader returned a challenge; an indexed direct article supplied a valid source and original. PDF reader cache fetch failed once; ordinary publisher GET succeeded. No bypass, account, outreach or broad genealogy. Original HTML/PDF bytes, their derived text, rendered pages and exact hashes are preserved in root-captures.json. Root has not searched for a response to this letter in this run.</p>",
        "path": "oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09/statewatch-divergence.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-12639f108d96",
          "w31-fa-s-swcsa",
          "w31-fa-s-swletterpage",
          "w31-fa-s-swletter",
          "w31-fa-s-oakihr"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition closed. This lane compares named donor grants with actions by their recipients; it does not claim a grant paid for a particular action. The Digital Freedom Fund lane is separate.\n\nOak's retained 2025 Annual Report, PDF/printed25, lists Statewatch USD303622 over three years for news, information and analysis on EU spending and justice/home-affairs practice. It lists Digital Freedom Fund USD631579 over three years in core support for the European digital-rights community. Root read PDF22–26 and visually checked the complete page25 columns. These are reported grant amounts and durations; exact contracting entities, start/end dates, payment timing and conditions are absent. The Statewatch entry does not say unrestricted core support. Donor report (see source references) is reused from the preceding Oak packet, not a second confirmation.\n\nThe same donor's current International Human Rights programme sets priorities that include reliable information, media pluralism, an open and accountable digital sphere, and protection for human-rights defenders. It explicitly allows intermediary organisations in some geographies. This provides a programme-level rationale that could accommodate watchdogs and opponents of excessive surveillance. It supplies no specific grant-approval chain or direction to Statewatch. Root read the complete substantive programme section in the official reader and retained original HTML. Programme (see source references)\n\n## A documented opposing position on the EU proposal\n\nStatewatch's dated 13 September 2023 statement identifies itself as a signatory to an EDRi-coordinated call for EU governments to reject the proposed Child Sexual Abuse Regulation until it protects rights and security. The statement objects to blanket scanning of private communications and potential ID checks, on privacy, encryption and exclusion grounds. Those are the signatories' claims about the then proposal; this comparison does not independently resolve every legal or technical assertion or establish the current 2026 text. Signed statement (see source references) Root read the substantive statement and signatory list, including Statewatch. It predates the 2025 grant: the later grant cannot explain the origin of this 2023 position.\n\nFor the comparator, root refreshed existing case source src-12639f108d96 and read all four pages of the WeProtect Secretariat's original EC consultation submission. It strongly supports the legislative initiative, mandatory detection obligations and a new EU centre, alongside safeguards, constrained information extraction, oversight and classification standards. It also expresses interest in collaborating with the proposed centre. The undated document gives membership figures as of 12 September 2022; this is not an exact submission date. PDF4 explicitly separates Secretariat views from members' positions. Submission (see source references)\n\nThese are different positions on the same legislative initiative at different dates, with potentially different draft versions. Both invoke rights and safeguards; they disagree over whether the proposed detection regime merits support. Do not turn this into a vote on identical final clauses, a position held by every WeProtect member, or proof Oak financed opposition and support simultaneously. Current case relationship n25 already records the supporting submission; the fresh original improves its source custody. The imported source's access_state had remained discovered despite the relationship's historical read note; this new scoped reread supplies explicit current evidence for later integration.\n\n## A direct UK intervention seeking limits and remedies\n\nStatewatch also signed an Open Rights Group-coordinated letter to Ofcom, Meta, Alphabet, X and ByteDance, dated 4 August 2025 on the signatory publisher's page. The retained five-page PDF identifies ORG on its letterhead and Statewatch on PDF5. It seeks clarification and safeguards against over-removing lawful political expression under the OSA following Palestine Action's proscription: clear guidance, transparency, impact assessment, appeal/restoration processes, conditional independent dispute resolution, and clarity on global versus UK removal. These are requested protections, not demonstrated remedies or acquired regulatory commitments. Publisher's letter page (see source references) attached PDF (see source references)\n\nRoot read the whole PDF and substantive HTML, and visually checked PDF5. Its characterisations of legal powers, particular detentions and the regulator's bypass strategy remain attributed assertions here; no independent legal/current-proscription audit was performed. The PDF itself has no extracted date; the date comes from the publisher. The 2026/04 URL path is a hosting path, not the letter date. The PDF lists D3 Portugal, absent from the current page's signatory text, so do not claim exact signatory-list identity. Statewatch appears in both. No sent-mail evidence, recipient reply or implemented correction was acquired. The date coincides with the separately evidenced DSIT/Ofcom meeting; a shared date alone supplies no connection between that meeting and this letter.\n\n## What the comparison can establish\n\nA common Oak funding node connects organisations that have publicly advocated different boundaries on digital power. This supports a model with recipient agency, differing programme objectives and contest over implementation. It weakens a uniform-policy inference from shared funding alone. It neither erases selection/renewal leverage nor proves all recipients independent in every decision. Statewatch's UK letter is critical engagement seeking constrained enforcement and remedies, not evidence it rejects all online-safety regulation or every form of age assurance. The sharper questions are which decisions a funder can approve, which decisions intermediaries allocate elsewhere, and whose proposed controls are actually adopted.\n\nFinite acquisition: two Statewatch intervention records and one already-cited WeProtect comparator. The Statewatch month-index reader returned a challenge; an indexed direct article supplied a valid source and original. PDF reader cache fetch failed once; ordinary publisher GET succeeded. No bypass, account, outreach or broad genealogy. Original HTML/PDF bytes, their derived text, rendered pages and exact hashes are preserved in root-captures.json. Root has not searched for a response to this letter in this run.\n",
        "file": "research/oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority",
        "title": "Crisis authority: inputs, decisions and the record left behind",
        "description": "Bounded root acquisition closed 9 September 2026. June's decision is distinct from current commencement, addressed in the companion status lane. Principal source is Ofcom's 9 June 2026 crisis statement, as scoped official-reader derivatives, not original PDF bytes: httplocal research file . One ordinary GET returned403 and is closed. Page numbers below are o",
        "html": "<p>Bounded root acquisition closed 9 September 2026. June&#x27;s decision is distinct from current commencement, addressed in the companion status lane. Principal source is Ofcom&#x27;s 9 June 2026 crisis statement, retained as scoped official-reader derivatives, not original PDF bytes: http[local research file] . One ordinary GET returned403 and is closed. Page numbers below are one-based PDF pages and also match the statement&#x27;s printed pages in these passages. No images were inspected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-can-initiate-and-who-decides\">Who can initiate and who decides</h2>\n<p>Paragraphs3.18-3.23 (PDF10-12) place crisis determination with the provider using its indicators. Local, regional or overseas events can qualify if linked to a serious UK public-safety threat and the specified increase in relevant illegal content or content harmful to children. Examples of external indicators include law enforcement/intelligence agencies, NGOs without trusted-flagger status, civil contingency bodies, news, other services and trusted flaggers; internal complaints/moderation signals can also count. These are permitted examples, not automatic activation orders or proof a named NGO has been chosen. The provider assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team, chooses systems and acts as soon as reasonably practicable after determination (3.20,3.26).</p>\n<p>There is a specifically added government input. Paragraphs3.11 and3.23 say an Ofcom public statement notice issued under a Secretary of State section175 direction should be considered alongside the provider&#x27;s indicators. Paragraphs3.46-47 expressly connect this amendment to two stakeholders&#x27; questions about the interaction. Footnote29, PDF17, identifies Full Fact&#x27;s response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on4August2025. This is a regulator-attributed link between consultation/departmental engagement and an actual drafting change. It does not disclose what either participant asked or prove they proposed or controlled the resulting wording. Their underlying records are the discriminating evidence still to obtain.</p>\n<p>Section175 itself has different powers. The retained original enacted Online Safety Act, PDF169-170/printed155-156, was read for the whole section: http[local research file] . On reasonable grounds for a public-health/safety or national-security threat, the Secretary can direct Ofcom&#x27;s media-literacy priorities for a specified period, or require Ofcom to issue public statement notices to named or general providers. A notice requires a public statement by a specified date; subsection5 additionally permits Ofcom to require information for responding to the threat. Public-health/safety reasons must be published under subsection6; the same subsection does not impose that publication duty on the national-security ground. Direction and consequent notice can be varied/revoked. This is enacted-text custody, not a fresh current-consolidation or commencement audit; Ofcom&#x27;s June statement independently treats the power as relevant. It is not, on this text alone, a direct power to order removal of any specified lawful post. A compelled explanation/information demand can nevertheless create practical pressure; exercised effects require a worked notice and response.</p>\n<h2 id=\"communication-and-the-limits-of-the-channel\">Communication and the limits of the channel</h2>\n<p>The dedicated law-enforcement channel applies to large in-scope services once they determine a crisis is occurring or likely (3.27-29, PDF13). Its stated purpose is fast crisis information into the service. A1.61-64, PDF34-35, expressly preserves existing legal processes for routine data requests and places retention/preservation arrangements under existing law. Ofcom disclaims a general power in these measures to compel disclosure to police. Smaller high-risk services can be in protocol scope without being in dedicated-channel scope.</p>\n<p>A1.48-59, PDF33-34, records requests for wider formal NGO/fact-checker contact and real-time data access. Ofcom encourages relevant collaboration but declines to extend formal contact obligations to those bodies or become a central cross-service coordinator. Existing voluntary industry cooperation is not made a recommended component here. Its separate discussion of a possible researcher-access framework is not an enacted data-access entitlement created by this crisis measure. This distinguishes an NGO input from a police channel, a chosen partnership and a compulsory shared database.</p>\n<h2 id=\"persistence-accountability-and-acknowledged-error\">Persistence, accountability and acknowledged error</h2>\n<p>Paragraphs3.30-34, PDF13-14, recommend ending the crisis protocol when criteria no longer apply or at90days, whichever is sooner, then recording key decisions in a post-crisis analysis. Continuing conditions move to ordinary operations and resilience planning. The90-day limit is therefore not a promised restoration of removed content, accounts or former moderation rules. Further detailed logs, rationale, partner engagement and responsible teams are suggested analysis contents, not a prescribed universal public ledger.</p>\n<p>A1.40-47, PDF31-32, declines automatic publication or submission of every analysis. Providers retain records; Ofcom can seek them for supervision/enforcement and ask about activation. The public may consequently see less of the operating evidence than the provider/regulator. That is a documented visibility asymmetry, not proof that any particular record is suppressed or that no disclosure mechanism exists elsewhere.</p>\n<p>Rights safeguards coexist with an explicit risk judgment. A1.127-138, PDF44-45, preserves existing appeals, expression, privacy and data protection. But3.65-67, PDF19-20, acknowledges that provider implementation may increase false positives affecting political, journalistic or religious expression. Ofcom assesses the higher risk as likely proportionate during the defined rare crises, while saying speed-over-accuracy is not what its measures recommend. The record neither guarantees error-free operation nor prescribes indiscriminate removal. The relevant test is a real activation&#x27;s decision log and correction results.</p>\n<h2 id=\"meaning-for-the-case-and-finite-boundary\">Meaning for the case and finite boundary</h2>\n<p>The framework is a structured escalation process with several input sources and separated decision rights. A named regulatory drafting amendment can now be traced to Full Fact and DSIT engagement at the attribution level. Ministerial compulsion to explain/provide information, operational platform choice and police communication are different levers; combining them into a single takedown order would erase the mechanism we need to investigate. Conversely, calling the whole process merely voluntary would conceal the statutory duties and compelled-notice route.</p>\n<p>No particular crisis activation, section175 direction, platform notice, decision log or repaired false positive was acquired. No actual Full Fact p17 or4August2025meeting record was acquired in this lane. Those are concrete, likely existing records, with the statement itself identifying two of them. Root source-reading scope covers the named paragraphs and immediate context, not all70pages or their cited studies. Current status of remaining CMA proposals and crisis commencement is delegated to the companion lane. No new unrelated branch, outreach or transport retry.</p>\n<h2 id=\"root-comparison-with-the-laid-childrens-draft\">Root comparison with the laid children&#x27;s draft</h2>\n<p>Root subsequently read the full operative C11/C12 text in the original GOV.UK18June HTML and the current official reader, plus HCWS124. The draft was submitted12June and laid18June; its preamble retains blank signatory/date and bracketed commencement. Its future-perfect template language is not a completed issue/commencement record. HCWS124 independently establishes laying and the conditional40-day scrutiny/21-days-after-issue process, not a final effective date. See companion status note for the dated public-status search.</p>\n<p>The draft makes an important precision visible: C11.7 expressly requires the analysis when the provider determines the crisis has ended or90days after it began, if earlier, then improvements to the protocol. It does not itself repeat the statement&#x27;s separate end-the-protocol-at90days sentence. The statement supplies that explanatory recommendation. Neither text promises that90days restores removed posts or pre-crisis ordinary procedures. C11.8 cross-refers to named existing moderation/reporting/appeal safeguards rather than creating a freestanding new crisis appeal procedure. C12.3 remains conditional on the provider&#x27;s determination. This comparison uses the children&#x27;s draft; no unacquired final illegal-content code is silently substituted.</p>",
        "path": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09/crisis-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-crisis"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded root acquisition closed 9 September 2026. June's decision is distinct from current commencement, addressed in the companion status lane. Principal source is Ofcom's 9 June 2026 crisis statement, retained as scoped official-reader derivatives, not original PDF bytes: http[local research file] . One ordinary GET returned403 and is closed. Page numbers below are one-based PDF pages and also match the statement's printed pages in these passages. No images were inspected.\n\n## Who can initiate and who decides\n\nParagraphs3.18-3.23 (PDF10-12) place crisis determination with the provider using its indicators. Local, regional or overseas events can qualify if linked to a serious UK public-safety threat and the specified increase in relevant illegal content or content harmful to children. Examples of external indicators include law enforcement/intelligence agencies, NGOs without trusted-flagger status, civil contingency bodies, news, other services and trusted flaggers; internal complaints/moderation signals can also count. These are permitted examples, not automatic activation orders or proof a named NGO has been chosen. The provider assembles a sufficiently senior cross-functional team, chooses systems and acts as soon as reasonably practicable after determination (3.20,3.26).\n\nThere is a specifically added government input. Paragraphs3.11 and3.23 say an Ofcom public statement notice issued under a Secretary of State section175 direction should be considered alongside the provider's indicators. Paragraphs3.46-47 expressly connect this amendment to two stakeholders' questions about the interaction. Footnote29, PDF17, identifies Full Fact's response p17 and an Ofcom/DSIT meeting on4August2025. This is a regulator-attributed link between consultation/departmental engagement and an actual drafting change. It does not disclose what either participant asked or prove they proposed or controlled the resulting wording. Their underlying records are the discriminating evidence still to obtain.\n\nSection175 itself has different powers. The retained original enacted Online Safety Act, PDF169-170/printed155-156, was read for the whole section: http[local research file] . On reasonable grounds for a public-health/safety or national-security threat, the Secretary can direct Ofcom's media-literacy priorities for a specified period, or require Ofcom to issue public statement notices to named or general providers. A notice requires a public statement by a specified date; subsection5 additionally permits Ofcom to require information for responding to the threat. Public-health/safety reasons must be published under subsection6; the same subsection does not impose that publication duty on the national-security ground. Direction and consequent notice can be varied/revoked. This is enacted-text custody, not a fresh current-consolidation or commencement audit; Ofcom's June statement independently treats the power as relevant. It is not, on this text alone, a direct power to order removal of any specified lawful post. A compelled explanation/information demand can nevertheless create practical pressure; exercised effects require a worked notice and response.\n\n## Communication and the limits of the channel\n\nThe dedicated law-enforcement channel applies to large in-scope services once they determine a crisis is occurring or likely (3.27-29, PDF13). Its stated purpose is fast crisis information into the service. A1.61-64, PDF34-35, expressly preserves existing legal processes for routine data requests and places retention/preservation arrangements under existing law. Ofcom disclaims a general power in these measures to compel disclosure to police. Smaller high-risk services can be in protocol scope without being in dedicated-channel scope.\n\nA1.48-59, PDF33-34, records requests for wider formal NGO/fact-checker contact and real-time data access. Ofcom encourages relevant collaboration but declines to extend formal contact obligations to those bodies or become a central cross-service coordinator. Existing voluntary industry cooperation is not made a recommended component here. Its separate discussion of a possible researcher-access framework is not an enacted data-access entitlement created by this crisis measure. This distinguishes an NGO input from a police channel, a chosen partnership and a compulsory shared database.\n\n## Persistence, accountability and acknowledged error\n\nParagraphs3.30-34, PDF13-14, recommend ending the crisis protocol when criteria no longer apply or at90days, whichever is sooner, then recording key decisions in a post-crisis analysis. Continuing conditions move to ordinary operations and resilience planning. The90-day limit is therefore not a promised restoration of removed content, accounts or former moderation rules. Further detailed logs, rationale, partner engagement and responsible teams are suggested analysis contents, not a prescribed universal public ledger.\n\nA1.40-47, PDF31-32, declines automatic publication or submission of every analysis. Providers retain records; Ofcom can seek them for supervision/enforcement and ask about activation. The public may consequently see less of the operating evidence than the provider/regulator. That is a documented visibility asymmetry, not proof that any particular record is suppressed or that no disclosure mechanism exists elsewhere.\n\nRights safeguards coexist with an explicit risk judgment. A1.127-138, PDF44-45, preserves existing appeals, expression, privacy and data protection. But3.65-67, PDF19-20, acknowledges that provider implementation may increase false positives affecting political, journalistic or religious expression. Ofcom assesses the higher risk as likely proportionate during the defined rare crises, while saying speed-over-accuracy is not what its measures recommend. The record neither guarantees error-free operation nor prescribes indiscriminate removal. The relevant test is a real activation's decision log and correction results.\n\n## Meaning for the case and finite boundary\n\nThe framework is a structured escalation process with several input sources and separated decision rights. A named regulatory drafting amendment can now be traced to Full Fact and DSIT engagement at the attribution level. Ministerial compulsion to explain/provide information, operational platform choice and police communication are different levers; combining them into a single takedown order would erase the mechanism we need to investigate. Conversely, calling the whole process merely voluntary would conceal the statutory duties and compelled-notice route.\n\nNo particular crisis activation, section175 direction, platform notice, decision log or repaired false positive was acquired. No actual Full Fact p17 or4August2025meeting record was acquired in this lane. Those are concrete, likely existing records, with the statement itself identifying two of them. Root source-reading scope covers the named paragraphs and immediate context, not all70pages or their cited studies. Current status of remaining CMA proposals and crisis commencement is delegated to the companion lane. No new unrelated branch, outreach or transport retry.\n\n## Root comparison with the laid children's draft\n\nRoot subsequently read the full operative C11/C12 text in the original GOV.UK18June HTML and the current official reader, plus HCWS124. The draft was submitted12June and laid18June; its preamble retains blank signatory/date and bracketed commencement. Its future-perfect template language is not a completed issue/commencement record. HCWS124 independently establishes laying and the conditional40-day scrutiny/21-days-after-issue process, not a final effective date. See companion status note for the dated public-status search.\n\nThe draft makes an important precision visible: C11.7 expressly requires the analysis when the provider determines the crisis has ended or90days after it began, if earlier, then improvements to the protocol. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-the-protocol-at90days sentence. The statement supplies that explanatory recommendation. Neither text promises that90days restores removed posts or pre-crisis ordinary procedures. C11.8 cross-refers to named existing moderation/reporting/appeal safeguards rather than creating a freestanding new crisis appeal procedure. C12.3 remains conditional on the provider's determination. This comparison uses the children's draft; no unacquired final illegal-content code is silently substituted.\n",
        "file": "research/ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-crisis-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status",
        "title": "Status of remaining Additional Safety Measures",
        "description": "Bounded official-record check closed on 9 September 2026. This is a status packet, not a fresh interpretation of the crisis protocol's operational powers.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded official-record check closed on 9 September 2026. This is a status packet, not a fresh interpretation of the crisis protocol&#x27;s operational powers.</p>\n<p>The strongest current public evidence located still schedules the wider Additional Safety Measures statement for autumn 2026. No final disposition of CMA&#x27;s creator/advertiser checks or pre-monetization review was located in the finite official search. That is a qualified acquisition result, not proof that no decision exists or that every proposal remains substantively undecided.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Item</th>\n<th>Status established by inspected records</th>\n<th>What is not established</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Remaining Additional Safety Measures</td>\n<td>Ofcom&#x27;s roadmap, updated 28 July, says it is considering responses and will publish its statement by autumn. Its compliance milestones, updated 24 August, still list autumn publication with the statement link to be confirmed.</td>\n<td>A final decision accepting/rejecting CMA&#x27;s identity checks or pre-monetization review; an implementation date for those proposals.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Crisis-response amendments</td>\n<td>June decision; draft submitted to the Secretary of State on 12 June and laid on 18 June. Parliamentary scrutiny and subsequent Ofcom issue precede the stated 21-day commencement period.</td>\n<td>A completed issue notice and exact date these crisis amendments entered, or will enter, force.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Intimate-image hash matching</td>\n<td>The 9 September official enforcement announcement expressly sets 30 September 2026 as the new measures&#x27; start date. The current regulatory index lists issued but not-yet-in-force illegal-content code amendments.</td>\n<td>That this separate commencement also applies to crisis measures or the wider CMA proposals.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"remaining-measures-a-current-schedule-not-a-completed-decision\">Remaining measures: a current schedule, not a completed decision</h2>\n<p>The [Ofcom implementation roadmap](http[local research file] displayed updated <strong>28 July 2026</strong>, places the wider Additional Safety Measures statement in autumn (reader lines200–202). The [compliance milestones](http[local research file] displayed updated <strong>24 August 2026</strong>, repeats that schedule (line197) and warns that dates may change (line141). These are newer affirmative scheduling records than the June crisis statement&#x27;s forecast or the consultation&#x27;s stale aggregate pending label.</p>\n<p>The roadmap separately reports two consultations opened on 10 July: one on Category 1 duties including identity verification, and another on fraudulent advertising for Categories 1/2a (lines188–197). This does not establish adoption of CMA&#x27;s monetizing-creator/advertiser proposal. This lane did not read those separate consultation instruments and does not collapse their identity provisions into CMA&#x27;s request.</p>\n<p>The accepted CMA packet remains the source for the proposal itself: <a href=\"/research/cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings\">submission-findings.md</a>. Its verification subjects include monetizing creators and advertisers; that can affect pseudonymity without constituting universal viewer ID. The June crisis response explicitly declining specific monetization practices remains a disposition of that part of CMA&#x27;s request, not a blanket rejection of its other proposals.</p>\n<h2 id=\"crisis-actual-parliamentary-step-located-commencement-still-unverified\">Crisis: actual parliamentary step located, commencement still unverified</h2>\n<p>[HCWS124, 18 June 2026](http[local research file] by the Minister for AI and Online Safety, states that draft crisis amendments are being laid that day and describes the 40-day parliamentary period followed by force 21 days after code issue (reader lines27–33). The statement also distinguishes existing duties and voluntary early implementation from the amended code&#x27;s start. It does not certify that the scrutiny and issue steps have already finished.</p>\n<p>The [GOV.UK children&#x27;s-code draft](http[local research file] published 18 June, records submission to the Secretary of State on 12 June. Its preamble 1.1–1.6 contains anticipated completed-process wording, but the document is expressly a draft, its commencement remains bracketed and its signature name, position and date are placeholders. Those features prevent using preamble 1.4 as proof that scrutiny concluded or 1.5 as a dated commencement notice. Original HTML retained as <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">status-draft-childrens-amendments.html</a>; locally extracted text is separately available.</p>\n<p>The accepted statement&#x27;s cover date is 9 June; the current Ofcom roadmap and regulatory index call the crisis announcement/publication 18 June, while government records establish laying 18 June. These dates are retained as source-specific metadata and procedural events, not silently normalized into one date. This packet does not establish the reason for the publication-label difference.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-changed-on-9-september\">What changed on 9 September</h2>\n<p>The [current regulatory-document index](http[local research file] updated 9 September, lists upcoming user-to-user and search Illegal Content Codes as issued 9 September and not yet in force, with amendments taking effect 21 days after issue (lines129–141). Opening the new user-to-user code link 44 through the reader returned Internal Error. A subsequent ordinary GET of the index returned 403 and could not supply the target URL for a direct-code substitute. The route was closed; the new PDF&#x27;s contents were not inspected. Consequently, this packet does not infer from the index whether that PDF contains crisis amendments.</p>\n<p>The [9 September NCII enforcement record](http[local research file] lines129–156, independently names 30 September for the hash-matching measures. Its [same-day news account](http[local research file] lines131–138, also preserves an alternative route using equally effective systems/processes. This establishes a specific upcoming measure and enforcement programme, not that every platform must purchase one named tool. The news also announces an SWGfL information/expertise/evidence partnership and recommends StopNCII; no partnership terms or procurement were acquired in this status lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-and-closure-boundary\">Reading and closure boundary</h2>\n<p><a>status-reader-scopes.txt</a> retains selected successful official-reader passages. These are derivatives, not original HTML or PDF bytes. <a>disposition-captures.json</a> records exact scopes, queries, files, hashes and failures. The only substantive new original acquired here is the GOV.UK draft HTML. The ordinary parliamentary GET returned 403, but the successful official reader supplied the full substantive HCWS124 statement. Earlier failed submission and crisis-PDF transports were not retried.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is a completed, dated Ofcom issue notice/consolidated crisis code and a final statement specifically disposing of CMA&#x27;s verification/review proposals. The bounded check did not obtain either. Do not calculate a crisis start date by simply adding 40 and 21 calendar days to 18 June, or treat absence from search results as proof of non-publication. No further branch was opened.</p>",
        "path": "ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09/disposition-status.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w31-fa-s-roadmap",
          "w31-fa-s-statusindex",
          "w31-fa-s-nciinews",
          "w31-fa-s-nciistatus",
          "w31-fa-s-laying",
          "w31-fa-s-childdraft"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded official-record check closed on 9 September 2026. This is a status packet, not a fresh interpretation of the crisis protocol's operational powers.\n\nThe strongest current public evidence located still schedules the wider Additional Safety Measures statement for autumn 2026. No final disposition of CMA's creator/advertiser checks or pre-monetization review was located in the finite official search. That is a qualified acquisition result, not proof that no decision exists or that every proposal remains substantively undecided.\n\n| Item | Status established by inspected records | What is not established |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Remaining Additional Safety Measures | Ofcom's roadmap, updated 28 July, says it is considering responses and will publish its statement by autumn. Its compliance milestones, updated 24 August, still list autumn publication with the statement link to be confirmed. | A final decision accepting/rejecting CMA's identity checks or pre-monetization review; an implementation date for those proposals. |\n| Crisis-response amendments | June decision; draft submitted to the Secretary of State on 12 June and laid on 18 June. Parliamentary scrutiny and subsequent Ofcom issue precede the stated 21-day commencement period. | A completed issue notice and exact date these crisis amendments entered, or will enter, force. |\n| Intimate-image hash matching | The 9 September official enforcement announcement expressly sets 30 September 2026 as the new measures' start date. The current regulatory index lists issued but not-yet-in-force illegal-content code amendments. | That this separate commencement also applies to crisis measures or the wider CMA proposals. |\n\n## Remaining measures: a current schedule, not a completed decision\n\nThe Ofcom implementation roadmap (see source references) displayed updated **28 July 2026**, places the wider Additional Safety Measures statement in autumn (reader lines200–202). The compliance milestones (see source references) displayed updated **24 August 2026**, repeats that schedule (line197) and warns that dates may change (line141). These are newer affirmative scheduling records than the June crisis statement's forecast or the consultation's stale aggregate pending label.\n\nThe roadmap separately reports two consultations opened on 10 July: one on Category 1 duties including identity verification, and another on fraudulent advertising for Categories 1/2a (lines188–197). This does not establish adoption of CMA's monetizing-creator/advertiser proposal. This lane did not read those separate consultation instruments and does not collapse their identity provisions into CMA's request.\n\nThe accepted CMA packet remains the source for the proposal itself: [submission-findings.md](cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings.md). Its verification subjects include monetizing creators and advertisers; that can affect pseudonymity without constituting universal viewer ID. The June crisis response explicitly declining specific monetization practices remains a disposition of that part of CMA's request, not a blanket rejection of its other proposals.\n\n## Crisis: actual parliamentary step located, commencement still unverified\n\nHCWS124, 18 June 2026 (see source references) by the Minister for AI and Online Safety, states that draft crisis amendments are being laid that day and describes the 40-day parliamentary period followed by force 21 days after code issue (reader lines27–33). The statement also distinguishes existing duties and voluntary early implementation from the amended code's start. It does not certify that the scrutiny and issue steps have already finished.\n\nThe GOV.UK children's-code draft (see source references) published 18 June, records submission to the Secretary of State on 12 June. Its preamble 1.1–1.6 contains anticipated completed-process wording, but the document is expressly a draft, its commencement remains bracketed and its signature name, position and date are placeholders. Those features prevent using preamble 1.4 as proof that scrutiny concluded or 1.5 as a dated commencement notice. Original HTML retained as [status-draft-childrens-amendments.html](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services); locally extracted text is separately available.\n\nThe accepted statement's cover date is 9 June; the current Ofcom roadmap and regulatory index call the crisis announcement/publication 18 June, while government records establish laying 18 June. These dates are retained as source-specific metadata and procedural events, not silently normalized into one date. This packet does not establish the reason for the publication-label difference.\n\n## What changed on 9 September\n\nThe current regulatory-document index (see source references) updated 9 September, lists upcoming user-to-user and search Illegal Content Codes as issued 9 September and not yet in force, with amendments taking effect 21 days after issue (lines129–141). Opening the new user-to-user code link 44 through the reader returned Internal Error. A subsequent ordinary GET of the index returned 403 and could not supply the target URL for a direct-code substitute. The route was closed; the new PDF's contents were not inspected. Consequently, this packet does not infer from the index whether that PDF contains crisis amendments.\n\nThe 9 September NCII enforcement record (see source references) lines129–156, independently names 30 September for the hash-matching measures. Its same-day news account (see source references) lines131–138, also preserves an alternative route using equally effective systems/processes. This establishes a specific upcoming measure and enforcement programme, not that every platform must purchase one named tool. The news also announces an SWGfL information/expertise/evidence partnership and recommends StopNCII; no partnership terms or procurement were acquired in this status lane.\n\n## Reading and closure boundary\n\nstatus-reader-scopes.txt retains selected successful official-reader passages. These are derivatives, not original HTML or PDF bytes. disposition-captures.json records exact scopes, queries, files, hashes and failures. The only substantive new original acquired here is the GOV.UK draft HTML. The ordinary parliamentary GET returned 403, but the successful official reader supplied the full substantive HCWS124 statement. Earlier failed submission and crisis-PDF transports were not retried.\n\nThe next discriminating record is a completed, dated Ofcom issue notice/consolidated crisis code and a final statement specifically disposing of CMA's verification/review proposals. The bounded check did not obtain either. Do not calculate a crisis start date by simply adding 40 and 21 calendar days to 18 June, or treat absence from search results as proof of non-publication. No further branch was opened.\n",
        "file": "research/ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output",
        "title": "OSDI evaluation output: bounded public-source pass",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Five search queries completed, followed by inspection of one specifically identified primary PDF. Acquisition stops here for the forest review.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Five search queries completed, followed by inspection of one specifically identified primary PDF. Acquisition stops here for the forest review.</p>\n<p>No PA Consulting OSDI final assessment, inception report, detailed agreed evaluation scope, or original OSDI product-evaluation framework was located in this pass. This is a search-coverage result, not evidence that evaluation did not occur. The public record found does include a later, substantive technical evaluation that expressly attributes part of its approach to OSDI. That supplies a documented methodological reuse route while leaving the original OSDI assessment gap intact.</p>\n<h2 id=\"programme-assurance-and-product-evaluation-are-distinct\">Programme assurance and product evaluation are distinct</h2>\n<p>The [official appointment account](http[local research file] dated 23 September 2021 and authored by project delivery lead Fiona Hallett, identifies PA Consulting as OSDI&#x27;s external evaluator. Its sections on the evaluator&#x27;s role and working relationship describe assurance of delivery processes, resource use, spending and quality; recommendations on governance; and communication of findings to senior civil servants. DCMS says it agreed responsibilities and priorities with PA in collaboration with the Faculty/PUBLIC supplier consortium. This is a public description of the agreed relationship, not the agreement or an evaluation result. No report attachment or detailed scope instrument was linked in the inspected article body. Reading scope: entire article body, web-reader rendition; no original HTML-byte capture by this worker.</p>\n<p>The previously retained <code>public-gcloud-sandbox.pdf</code>, final PDF page 13, is a separate supplier account of PUBLIC&#x27;s product-evaluation sandbox. Its framework, dataset, pilot and final-report claims do not establish that PA conducted those product tests. Root inspected that original; this worker did not independently audit its full contents. Neither OSDI role is the separate CDDP commission.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-published-reuse-record-with-evaluation-limits\">A published reuse record, with evaluation limits</h2>\n<p>[Evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round 2](http[local research file] cover dated October 2024, is a PUBLIC-authored report hosted by government. PDF page 3 says DSIT commissioned this separate, small-scale evaluation in February 2024. PDF page 10 and PDF page 33 explicitly credit OSDI practices alongside other inputs. Page 33 sets out performance, robustness, scalability, data privacy/security and user feedback criteria, with supplier surveys, interviews and quarterly reporting as evidence sources. Footnote 17 links only to the OSDI blog homepage; it does not expose the original framework.</p>\n<p>This report contains actual assessments: PDF page 41 assigns C4FF TRL4, CameraForensics TRL5 and Vistalworks TRL5, subject to further independent testing. PDF pages 9–10 describe a late-starting, high-level evaluation and limited testing data. Page 38 labels performance figures self-reported, cautions against unsupported cross-company comparison and calls for independent verification. These are PUBLIC&#x27;s bounded findings, not independently replicated scores or PA&#x27;s OSDI conclusions. The visible reuse establishes an attributed methodological contribution, not adoption of an OSDI standard into binding regulation.</p>\n<p>The acquired original is <code>evaluation-stcf2-original.pdf</code>: 774,350 bytes, 54 PDF pages; SHA-256 <code>1f44c2e0c818976571274eaa5b22c3b4ceafb85b7d4c4e42e83573d2e671f0aa</code>. One ordinary public GET succeeded. Text reading was scoped to PDF pages 1–5, 9–10, 31–34, 38, 41, 47 and 53, plus targeted web-reader findings. PDF pages 33 and 41 were rendered and visually inspected as <code>evaluation-stcf2-pdf33.png</code> and <code>evaluation-stcf2-pdf41.png</code>; the images confirm table alignment and printed-page numbering. Printed numbers are one less than physical PDF page numbers: the key approach is printed 32 / PDF 33, and the TRL table is printed 40 / PDF 41. The whole report was not comprehensively read. Embedded annotation inspection confirmed the exact footnote-17 URL <code>http[local research file]</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"search-coverage-and-discriminating-next-record\">Search coverage and discriminating next record</h2>\n<p>Queries used: <code>&quot;Online Safety Data Initiative&quot; &quot;PA Consulting&quot; evaluation report</code>; <code>&quot;Online Safety Data Initiative&quot; &quot;evaluation framework&quot;</code>; <code>site:gov.uk &quot;Online Safety Data Initiative&quot; evaluation results</code>; <code>&quot;OSDI&quot; &quot;evaluation&quot; &quot;PA Consulting&quot; report</code>; and <code>&quot;Online Safety Data Initiative&quot; &quot;evaluation&quot; &quot;final&quot; report</code>. These returned the evaluator announcement, programme planning/longlist material, the retained supplier service definition, sector/data reviews and the STCF2 report. Search-result references to other work do not establish that work was read. Root owns the newer Data Landscape Review; no parallel reread or new branch was started here.</p>\n<p>The next useful record family is precise: PA&#x27;s OSDI inception/evaluation plan containing the jointly agreed responsibilities and priorities; its final or periodic assurance report to the responsible senior civil servants; and the departmental acceptance or management response. The expected government custodian is the department holding the former DCMS online-safety technology programme records, with PA as the evaluator counterpart. For the product strand, the original framework version, pilot-testing protocol/results and final recommendations described by PUBLIC would distinguish a commissioned prototype from demonstrated effectiveness. None was requested or contacted, and no exact undiscovered filename is invented.</p>\n<p>The breakpoint is therefore an identifiable assurance-output gap plus a directly attributed reuse example. Do not replace the scoped gap with “no evaluation,” merge the three programmes, equate supplier self-report with replicated performance, or infer that the later STCF2 criteria exactly reproduce OSDI&#x27;s missing original instrument.</p>",
        "path": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09/osdi-evaluation-output.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-pa",
          "w33-con-s-stcf"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Five search queries completed, followed by inspection of one specifically identified primary PDF. Acquisition stops here for the forest review.\n\nNo PA Consulting OSDI final assessment, inception report, detailed agreed evaluation scope, or original OSDI product-evaluation framework was located in this pass. This is a search-coverage result, not evidence that evaluation did not occur. The public record found does include a later, substantive technical evaluation that expressly attributes part of its approach to OSDI. That supplies a documented methodological reuse route while leaving the original OSDI assessment gap intact.\n\n## Programme assurance and product evaluation are distinct\n\nThe official appointment account (see source references) dated 23 September 2021 and authored by project delivery lead Fiona Hallett, identifies PA Consulting as OSDI's external evaluator. Its sections on the evaluator's role and working relationship describe assurance of delivery processes, resource use, spending and quality; recommendations on governance; and communication of findings to senior civil servants. DCMS says it agreed responsibilities and priorities with PA in collaboration with the Faculty/PUBLIC supplier consortium. This is a public description of the agreed relationship, not the agreement or an evaluation result. No report attachment or detailed scope instrument was linked in the inspected article body. Reading scope: entire article body, web-reader rendition; no original HTML-byte capture by this worker.\n\nThe previously retained `public-gcloud-sandbox.pdf`, final PDF page 13, is a separate supplier account of PUBLIC's product-evaluation sandbox. Its framework, dataset, pilot and final-report claims do not establish that PA conducted those product tests. Root inspected that original; this worker did not independently audit its full contents. Neither OSDI role is the separate CDDP commission.\n\n## A published reuse record, with evaluation limits\n\nEvaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round 2 (see source references) cover dated October 2024, is a PUBLIC-authored report hosted by government. PDF page 3 says DSIT commissioned this separate, small-scale evaluation in February 2024. PDF page 10 and PDF page 33 explicitly credit OSDI practices alongside other inputs. Page 33 sets out performance, robustness, scalability, data privacy/security and user feedback criteria, with supplier surveys, interviews and quarterly reporting as evidence sources. Footnote 17 links only to the OSDI blog homepage; it does not expose the original framework.\n\nThis report contains actual assessments: PDF page 41 assigns C4FF TRL4, CameraForensics TRL5 and Vistalworks TRL5, subject to further independent testing. PDF pages 9–10 describe a late-starting, high-level evaluation and limited testing data. Page 38 labels performance figures self-reported, cautions against unsupported cross-company comparison and calls for independent verification. These are PUBLIC's bounded findings, not independently replicated scores or PA's OSDI conclusions. The visible reuse establishes an attributed methodological contribution, not adoption of an OSDI standard into binding regulation.\n\nThe acquired original is `evaluation-stcf2-original.pdf`: 774,350 bytes, 54 PDF pages; SHA-256 `1f44c2e0c818976571274eaa5b22c3b4ceafb85b7d4c4e42e83573d2e671f0aa`. One ordinary public GET succeeded. Text reading was scoped to PDF pages 1–5, 9–10, 31–34, 38, 41, 47 and 53, plus targeted web-reader findings. PDF pages 33 and 41 were rendered and visually inspected as `evaluation-stcf2-pdf33.png` and `evaluation-stcf2-pdf41.png`; the images confirm table alignment and printed-page numbering. Printed numbers are one less than physical PDF page numbers: the key approach is printed 32 / PDF 33, and the TRL table is printed 40 / PDF 41. The whole report was not comprehensively read. Embedded annotation inspection confirmed the exact footnote-17 URL `http[local research file]`.\n\n## Search coverage and discriminating next record\n\nQueries used: `\"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"PA Consulting\" evaluation report`; `\"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"evaluation framework\"`; `site:gov.uk \"Online Safety Data Initiative\" evaluation results`; `\"OSDI\" \"evaluation\" \"PA Consulting\" report`; and `\"Online Safety Data Initiative\" \"evaluation\" \"final\" report`. These returned the evaluator announcement, programme planning/longlist material, the retained supplier service definition, sector/data reviews and the STCF2 report. Search-result references to other work do not establish that work was read. Root owns the newer Data Landscape Review; no parallel reread or new branch was started here.\n\nThe next useful record family is precise: PA's OSDI inception/evaluation plan containing the jointly agreed responsibilities and priorities; its final or periodic assurance report to the responsible senior civil servants; and the departmental acceptance or management response. The expected government custodian is the department holding the former DCMS online-safety technology programme records, with PA as the evaluator counterpart. For the product strand, the original framework version, pilot-testing protocol/results and final recommendations described by PUBLIC would distinguish a commissioned prototype from demonstrated effectiveness. None was requested or contacted, and no exact undiscovered filename is invented.\n\nThe breakpoint is therefore an identifiable assurance-output gap plus a directly attributed reuse example. Do not replace the scoped gap with “no evaluation,” merge the three programmes, equate supplier self-report with replicated performance, or infer that the later STCF2 criteria exactly reproduce OSDI's missing original instrument.\n",
        "file": "research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market",
        "title": "The advisory route into a government-funded safety-technology programme",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Completed root lane of the OSDI comparison. These findings supplement the r21 graph; they are not yet graph-integrated. OSDI, CDDP and the Safety Tech Challenge Fund are distinct programmes. Advisory access, supplier delivery accounts and actual evaluated outputs retain different evidence states.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Completed root lane of the OSDI comparison. These findings supplement the r21 graph; they are not yet graph-integrated. OSDI, CDDP and the Safety Tech Challenge Fund are distinct programmes. Advisory access, supplier delivery accounts and actual evaluated outputs retain different evidence states.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-direct-reset-connection-with-a-defined-remit\">A direct Reset connection, with a defined remit</h2>\n<p>The government&#x27;s 2 July 2021 account identifies a ten-person Online Harms Expert Group convened and chaired by the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) for OSDI. Its role included advising on project scope and direction, privacy-preserving and legally robust data sharing, and data-stewardship practice. CDEI says the group had already encouraged attention to users&#x27; online experience alongside the technology industry&#x27;s needs. That is an official account of advice and input, not acquired meeting minutes or an approval instrument.</p>\n<p>The roster includes <strong>Poppy Wood, then Senior Advisor at Reset Tech</strong>, alongside ICO technology-policy head Ali Shah, Ofcom technology-policy lead Fred Langford, NSPCC policy head Andy Burrows, Open Data Institute programme lead Jack Hardinges, BBC product manager Jon Howard, Web Foundation adviser Azmina Dhrodia, Bristol researchers Asma Vranaki and Claudia Peersman, and Oxford researcher Jun Zhao. Roles are as listed in July2021, not claims about current employment. Poppy Wood&#x27;s later Reset UK directorship/member-control records are separate dated relationships already in the case.</p>\n<p>This is a concrete government-programme advisory route for a named Reset representative. It does not grant Reset a procurement vote, veto over deployment, ownership of government data, or approval of any later content decision. Those would require their own evidence.</p>\n<p>Source: [CDEI&#x27;s expert-group account](http[local research file] Full article and roster read; original retained as cdei-governance.html, 53,671 bytes, SHA256 5e0d8421c0f20775de28d1db2ed837351e9fee559d2b38029a8017c6c66660ed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-programme-was-building\">What the programme was building</h2>\n<p>The [official OSDI description](http[local research file] describes a fifteen-month project to improve access to data for technologies identifying and removing illegal and harmful content. It identifies government, OSTIA, Faculty Science and PUBLIC as participants. Shared Outcomes Fund financing is named; the fund-wide GBP200m is not OSDI&#x27;s own allocation.</p>\n<p>The [June2021 longlist](http[local research file] describes nearly seventy discovery interviews, workshops involving OSTIA members, and a Whitehall roundtable. Its candidate responses include data repositories, privacy-preserving access, common taxonomies, benchmarking/accreditation and procurement/marketplace support. These were twenty-three candidate solutions awaiting shortlisting, not twenty-three delivered products or enacted requirements. The separate [security workstream account](http[local research file] describes early security, privacy and legal design, including ICO guidance. It is an account of approach, not an independent compliance audit.</p>\n<p>The advisory group, discovery participants and government team therefore had a route to shape which industry problems became publicly funded projects. This locates influence in priority formation, before later procurement or deployment. The minutes, shortlisting matrix and specific feedback dispositions remain unacquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-delivered-prototype-is-claimed-but-production-performance-is-not-established\">A delivered prototype is claimed, but production performance is not established</h2>\n<p>PUBLIC&#x27;s G-Cloud14 service definition uses OSDI as a case study. It says it delivered a TRL4 evaluation sandbox to DCMS for pilot review/testing, focused on text models moderating suicide and self-harm. It describes a labelled dataset, technical and qualitative evaluation frameworks, three pilot firms, a DPIA, user guidance and scaling recommendations. Its final stage proposes progression to live operation; this is not proof of a live national service.</p>\n<p>This is first-party evidence of a claimed delivery in a commercial service description, not an inspected sandbox, replicated classifier test, named pilot roster or government acceptance certificate. Its reported two hundred-plus interviews and three roundtables describe a broader programme than the earlier seventy-interview discovery account; differing scope or timing is possible. Do not treat these figures as contradictory counts of the same measured event or sum them.</p>\n<p>[Original service definition](http[local research file] final PDF page13. Retained public-gcloud-sandbox.pdf: 3,142,085 bytes; SHA256 db602fec0ede3076b488f78be0bcd5698a16cf3c0cfb4306d8eb3ad641be4174. Root read the final case study and targeted surrounding methodology; not every service offering was evaluated.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"/research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output\">separate evaluation-output note</a> distinguishes PA Consulting&#x27;s programme-assurance role from PUBLIC&#x27;s product-evaluation role. It also identifies a later PUBLIC-authored STCF2 report explicitly reusing OSDI practices, with self-reporting and testing limitations. No original PA final assessment or original OSDI framework was located in that bounded search.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-same-market-reports-persistent-friction\">The same market reports persistent friction</h2>\n<p>A DSIT-commissioned, PUBLIC-produced [Data Landscape Review 2024–2025](http[local research file] published26March2026, gives a later account. It explicitly says PUBLIC produced earlier internal data-access reviews for DCMS. Its research comprises thirteen interviews between28January and5March2025, nine survey responses (six relevant to this workstream), and more than fifty-five sources. The appendix describes a targeted stakeholder tracker with selection reasons, tailored interview scripts and an affinity map; these underlying artifacts were not acquired. This small, purposive sector study is not a representative population survey or a direct causal evaluation of OSDI.</p>\n<p>The report&#x27;s acknowledgements include AVPA, Ofcom, OSTIA, Resolver, Yoti and other suppliers. That establishes participation or research input at the stated combined level, not that each answered every question, endorsed all conclusions or belonged to the earlier CDEI group. Its contextual citations include a Paladin/PUBLIC/Perspective Economics market study and a Tony Blair Institute paper. Citation does not establish commissioning by either organization.</p>\n<p>Its findings complicate any picture of a seamless apparatus. Providers report persistent data costs, commercial/IP barriers, platform reluctance and inconsistent classification practices. Market demand and customer awareness are described as especially pressing. Some interviewees report moving toward brand protection where demand is stronger. Government programmes are appreciated, yet respondents describe slower momentum and uncertainty about enforcement. The report treats regulation as a demand driver; that is attributed market analysis, not proof that any firm secretly authored legislation.</p>\n<p>One consequential reported development is sharing processed signals or classification outputs instead of raw datasets. That can preserve data custody while spreading judgments between services. The report gives Checkstep/Sightengine as one example and discusses other collaborative models. These are research-report claims requiring provider agreements, interface specifications and actual downstream decisions before promotion into an exercised cross-platform control claim. No WEF reference was found in the retained report&#x27;s text search; no exclusive taxonomy lineage is inferred.</p>\n<p>Retained report HTML: 336,941 bytes, SHA256 71fd0eb7b10593d398668bda52d09c45b66b414dada9640d3ca6274e2ae29e1f. Substantive reading: introduction/objectives and methodology; selected market, barrier and classification passages; intervention-impact section6.2; conclusion; appendix/acknowledgements and selected citations. A full HTML capture is not evidence every case study was independently checked. The link labelled as the full2022 Data Landscape Review resolves to an unrelated RDI organizational review; that page was not treated as the missing original.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes\">What this changes</h2>\n<p>We can now connect a named NGO representative to a specified government advisory group, an industry-informed selection process, commercial prototype development and later reuse of evaluation practices. That is more explanatory than a generic membership map. The field also contains legal constraints, resource shortages, competing interests and explicit limitations on measured performance.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are ordinary project artifacts: group minutes and advice dispositions; the shortlisting/selection matrix; original evaluation instruments and government acceptance; and, for the signal-sharing branch, contractual permission and downstream action rules. PUBLIC&#x27;s exact CDDP commission remains unresolved in the <a href=\"/research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp\">separate contract review</a>. The OSDI consortium cannot fill that gap by association.</p>",
        "path": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09/osdi-governance-market.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-landscape-case4",
          "w33-con-s-cdei",
          "w33-con-s-osdiabout",
          "w33-con-s-longlist",
          "w33-con-s-sandbox"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Completed root lane of the OSDI comparison. These findings supplement the r21 graph; they are not yet graph-integrated. OSDI, CDDP and the Safety Tech Challenge Fund are distinct programmes. Advisory access, supplier delivery accounts and actual evaluated outputs retain different evidence states.\n\n## A direct Reset connection, with a defined remit\n\nThe government's 2 July 2021 account identifies a ten-person Online Harms Expert Group convened and chaired by the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) for OSDI. Its role included advising on project scope and direction, privacy-preserving and legally robust data sharing, and data-stewardship practice. CDEI says the group had already encouraged attention to users' online experience alongside the technology industry's needs. That is an official account of advice and input, not acquired meeting minutes or an approval instrument.\n\nThe roster includes **Poppy Wood, then Senior Advisor at Reset Tech**, alongside ICO technology-policy head Ali Shah, Ofcom technology-policy lead Fred Langford, NSPCC policy head Andy Burrows, Open Data Institute programme lead Jack Hardinges, BBC product manager Jon Howard, Web Foundation adviser Azmina Dhrodia, Bristol researchers Asma Vranaki and Claudia Peersman, and Oxford researcher Jun Zhao. Roles are as listed in July2021, not claims about current employment. Poppy Wood's later Reset UK directorship/member-control records are separate dated relationships already in the case.\n\nThis is a concrete government-programme advisory route for a named Reset representative. It does not grant Reset a procurement vote, veto over deployment, ownership of government data, or approval of any later content decision. Those would require their own evidence.\n\nSource: CDEI's expert-group account (see source references) Full article and roster read; original retained as cdei-governance.html, 53,671 bytes, SHA256 5e0d8421c0f20775de28d1db2ed837351e9fee559d2b38029a8017c6c66660ed.\n\n## What the programme was building\n\nThe official OSDI description (see source references) describes a fifteen-month project to improve access to data for technologies identifying and removing illegal and harmful content. It identifies government, OSTIA, Faculty Science and PUBLIC as participants. Shared Outcomes Fund financing is named; the fund-wide GBP200m is not OSDI's own allocation.\n\nThe June2021 longlist (see source references) describes nearly seventy discovery interviews, workshops involving OSTIA members, and a Whitehall roundtable. Its candidate responses include data repositories, privacy-preserving access, common taxonomies, benchmarking/accreditation and procurement/marketplace support. These were twenty-three candidate solutions awaiting shortlisting, not twenty-three delivered products or enacted requirements. The separate security workstream account (see source references) describes early security, privacy and legal design, including ICO guidance. It is an account of approach, not an independent compliance audit.\n\nThe advisory group, discovery participants and government team therefore had a route to shape which industry problems became publicly funded projects. This locates influence in priority formation, before later procurement or deployment. The minutes, shortlisting matrix and specific feedback dispositions remain unacquired.\n\n## A delivered prototype is claimed, but production performance is not established\n\nPUBLIC's G-Cloud14 service definition uses OSDI as a case study. It says it delivered a TRL4 evaluation sandbox to DCMS for pilot review/testing, focused on text models moderating suicide and self-harm. It describes a labelled dataset, technical and qualitative evaluation frameworks, three pilot firms, a DPIA, user guidance and scaling recommendations. Its final stage proposes progression to live operation; this is not proof of a live national service.\n\nThis is first-party evidence of a claimed delivery in a commercial service description, not an inspected sandbox, replicated classifier test, named pilot roster or government acceptance certificate. Its reported two hundred-plus interviews and three roundtables describe a broader programme than the earlier seventy-interview discovery account; differing scope or timing is possible. Do not treat these figures as contradictory counts of the same measured event or sum them.\n\nOriginal service definition (see source references) final PDF page13. Retained public-gcloud-sandbox.pdf: 3,142,085 bytes; SHA256 db602fec0ede3076b488f78be0bcd5698a16cf3c0cfb4306d8eb3ad641be4174. Root read the final case study and targeted surrounding methodology; not every service offering was evaluated.\n\nThe [separate evaluation-output note](osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output.md) distinguishes PA Consulting's programme-assurance role from PUBLIC's product-evaluation role. It also identifies a later PUBLIC-authored STCF2 report explicitly reusing OSDI practices, with self-reporting and testing limitations. No original PA final assessment or original OSDI framework was located in that bounded search.\n\n## The same market reports persistent friction\n\nA DSIT-commissioned, PUBLIC-produced Data Landscape Review 2024–2025 (see source references) published26March2026, gives a later account. It explicitly says PUBLIC produced earlier internal data-access reviews for DCMS. Its research comprises thirteen interviews between28January and5March2025, nine survey responses (six relevant to this workstream), and more than fifty-five sources. The appendix describes a targeted stakeholder tracker with selection reasons, tailored interview scripts and an affinity map; these underlying artifacts were not acquired. This small, purposive sector study is not a representative population survey or a direct causal evaluation of OSDI.\n\nThe report's acknowledgements include AVPA, Ofcom, OSTIA, Resolver, Yoti and other suppliers. That establishes participation or research input at the stated combined level, not that each answered every question, endorsed all conclusions or belonged to the earlier CDEI group. Its contextual citations include a Paladin/PUBLIC/Perspective Economics market study and a Tony Blair Institute paper. Citation does not establish commissioning by either organization.\n\nIts findings complicate any picture of a seamless apparatus. Providers report persistent data costs, commercial/IP barriers, platform reluctance and inconsistent classification practices. Market demand and customer awareness are described as especially pressing. Some interviewees report moving toward brand protection where demand is stronger. Government programmes are appreciated, yet respondents describe slower momentum and uncertainty about enforcement. The report treats regulation as a demand driver; that is attributed market analysis, not proof that any firm secretly authored legislation.\n\nOne consequential reported development is sharing processed signals or classification outputs instead of raw datasets. That can preserve data custody while spreading judgments between services. The report gives Checkstep/Sightengine as one example and discusses other collaborative models. These are research-report claims requiring provider agreements, interface specifications and actual downstream decisions before promotion into an exercised cross-platform control claim. No WEF reference was found in the retained report's text search; no exclusive taxonomy lineage is inferred.\n\nRetained report HTML: 336,941 bytes, SHA256 71fd0eb7b10593d398668bda52d09c45b66b414dada9640d3ca6274e2ae29e1f. Substantive reading: introduction/objectives and methodology; selected market, barrier and classification passages; intervention-impact section6.2; conclusion; appendix/acknowledgements and selected citations. A full HTML capture is not evidence every case study was independently checked. The link labelled as the full2022 Data Landscape Review resolves to an unrelated RDI organizational review; that page was not treated as the missing original.\n\n## What this changes\n\nWe can now connect a named NGO representative to a specified government advisory group, an industry-informed selection process, commercial prototype development and later reuse of evaluation practices. That is more explanatory than a generic membership map. The field also contains legal constraints, resource shortages, competing interests and explicit limitations on measured performance.\n\nThe next discriminating records are ordinary project artifacts: group minutes and advice dispositions; the shortlisting/selection matrix; original evaluation instruments and government acceptance; and, for the signal-sharing branch, contractual permission and downstream action rules. PUBLIC's exact CDDP commission remains unresolved in the [separate contract review](osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp.md). The OSDI consortium cannot fill that gap by association.\n",
        "file": "research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp",
        "title": "PUBLIC's CDDP role: an attributed delivery claim, with the subcontract identity withheld",
        "description": "Bounded review, 9 September 2026. PUBLIC/CDDP only; OSDI governance and its separate consortium remain in the root lane. No new procurement award or PUBLIC-specific CDDP payment was established. Acquisition stops here for the forest review.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded review, 9 September 2026. PUBLIC/CDDP only; OSDI governance and its separate consortium remain in the root lane. No new procurement award or PUBLIC-specific CDDP payment was established. Acquisition stops here for the forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>PUBLIC itself says it helped deliver three Shared Outcomes Fund projects, including the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform. That supports an attributed claim of participation. It does not specify what PUBLIC delivered for CDDP, whether it held a direct commission or a subcontract, the relevant legal entity, a fee, a work period or an accepted deliverable. The original CDDP procurement link now redirects to the marketplace homepage. The retained official contract, however, exposes a precise missing record: the buyer&#x27;s approved key-subcontractor identities in the project-management call-off are redacted. That is a credible location where PUBLIC&#x27;s role might be resolved, without identifying PUBLIC as an obscured entry.</p>\n<p>The current PUBLIC website identifies its controller as PUBLIC Group International Ltd; the Companies House register supplies the exact legal name PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, number 10608507. This establishes a current brand/entity association. It does not prove that this company was the party performing the historical CDDP work.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-records-actually-establish\">What the records actually establish</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record and exact scope</th>\n<th>Supported result</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>[PUBLIC, Better collaboration, bigger impact](http[local research file] substantive article body from its first digital-transformation paragraph through its proposed roundtable; author Mahlet Yared</td>\n<td>PUBLIC describes participation in three Shared Outcomes Fund projects over the preceding 24 months, working with more than eight government departments in aggregate. Its CDDP paragraph identifies DCMS as lead and says delivery involved seven departments. The stated purpose is improved cross-government sharing and analysis of disinformation data.</td>\n<td>No article publication date appears in the read page or retained date metadata. The current footer&#x27;s 2025 copyright date and the relative 24-month period cannot supply a historical start/end date. The proposed roundtable is an announcement, without observed delivery or attendance. The aggregate departmental count is not PUBLIC&#x27;s CDDP-specific customer count.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[PUBLIC privacy policy](http[local research file] heading “As of January 2026” and “Identity and contact details of the data controller”</td>\n<td>PUBLIC Group International Ltd, at 1 Horse Guards Avenue, is the named controller for the site.</td>\n<td>A website-controller notice is not a CDDP contract or historical commissioning record.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Companies House company 10608507](http[local research file] overview identity, status, type and incorporation fields</td>\n<td>PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, active private limited company, incorporated 8 February 2017; registered office at PUBLIC Hall, 1 Horse Guards Avenue.</td>\n<td>No CDDP activity, payment or subcontract appears in these overview fields. No inference from directors, ownership or other clients was used.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Full Fact Report 2022](http[local research file] Chapter 3 paragraph listing CDDP and footnotes 36–38, especially footnote 38</td>\n<td>Full Fact identifies an original DCMS procurement titled Counter Disinformation Data Platform Digital / Technical Project Management Team, dated 26 August 2021, with opportunity 15487. It distinguishes CDDP from the OSDI entry and its consortium in the preceding paragraph.</td>\n<td>This is primary evidence of Full Fact&#x27;s citation, secondary evidence about an original notice that is no longer readable at that route. It does not cite PUBLIC&#x27;s delivery article or establish an article date.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Disclosed CDDP bundle](http[local research file] PDF 114–120 / order-form printed 2–8, call-off 102548</td>\n<td>DCMS is buyer and Faculty Science Limited, 08873131, is supplier for the Digital/Technical Project Management Team. PDF 115 dates the order form10 January 2022; PDF 116 states call-off start24 November 2021, expiry31 March 2023. The service encompasses discovery, development and delivery of a prototype. The read schedule includes project/product management, business analysis, service design, data science, legal/security and disinformation advisory roles, plus reports and sprint governance.</td>\n<td>Scope breadth makes a specialist contribution possible; it does not assign any role to PUBLIC. The initial phase dates and funding-gated later phase must not be flattened into proof that every listed service was performed. Execution, acceptance and PUBLIC-specific work were not established in this lane.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Same bundle, PDF 120 / printed 8, “Key Subcontractor(s)”</td>\n<td>The form says entry into it provides buyer written approval for the listed key subcontractors. The identifying entries immediately below are blacked out. This was visually checked in the original, rather than inferred from blank extracted text.</td>\n<td>Do not identify an obscured entry as PUBLIC, count the black bars as a proven count of entities, or call them empty fields.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Same bundle, PDF 180–181 and186, distinct call-off 102887</td>\n<td>This is the CDDP Technical Build Team G-Cloud 12 order, effective11 April 2022, with Faculty Science Ltd as supplier. Its supplier-information field states the subcontractors/partners list is “Not Applicable”.</td>\n<td>This is contract-specific. It neither resolves the redacted 102548 subcontractor list nor excludes a separate commission, earlier role or later variation involving PUBLIC.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The official [FOI release&#x27;s document inventory](http[local research file] lists the disclosed Faculty, NewsWhip and Oliver Wyman instruments, while withholding the Discovery Report and Product Operating Model. It is not evidence that PUBLIC never worked on the project. The release page itself has inconsistent displayed chronology: published 28 June 2024, request 25 August 2023, response 25 September 2024. Those labels are preserved rather than silently reconciled. This lane relies on the retained contract text for its dates, not a reconstructed release date.</p>\n<h2 id=\"rival-explanations-and-what-must-not-be-merged\">Rival explanations and what must not be merged</h2>\n<p>A PUBLIC contribution as one of the project-management supplier&#x27;s specialists or approved subcontractors is compatible with both the supplier&#x27;s claim and the redacted subcontract field. A separate consultancy commission or contribution at another phase is also compatible. A broad marketing description that compresses a narrower contribution remains possible. No obtained record discriminates between these explanations.</p>\n<p>The OSDI Faculty/PUBLIC consortium is evidence about OSDI. It cannot supply the missing CDDP contractual edge. Similarly, the 2022 G-Cloud build order&#x27;s subcontract field cannot override the distinct project-management order&#x27;s redacted list. The combined record supports a PUBLIC claim of CDDP involvement alongside an independently documented Faculty commission; it does not yet support a named PUBLIC subcontract, direct DCMS award, CDDP fee, software ownership or government acceptance of PUBLIC work.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-directional-relations\">Candidate directional relations</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From → to</th>\n<th>Type / stage</th>\n<th>Scope and confidence</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>PUBLIC brand → CDDP</td>\n<td>reports participation in delivery / supplier self-report</td>\n<td>Directly read claim; historical period undated and exact contribution unresolved.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PUBLIC website → PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 10608507</td>\n<td>identifies current website controller / website-controller disclosure plus register identity</td>\n<td>Strong current association; no backdated CDDP contract identity.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DCMS → Faculty Science Limited 08873131</td>\n<td>commissions through disclosed call-off 102548 / contractual instrument</td>\n<td>Digital/Technical Project Management Team; order-form date10 January 2022 and stated start24 November 2021. Separate from performance or acceptance.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DCMS → undisclosed key subcontractor identities</td>\n<td>provides approval through102548 order form / redacted identification</td>\n<td>Mechanism observed at PDF 120, identities unreadable; keep this as a record-gap relation, not a PUBLIC edge.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DCMS → Faculty Science Ltd</td>\n<td>commissions through separate call-off 102887 / contractual instrument</td>\n<td>Technical Build Team effective11 April 2022; no listed subcontractor/partner in the inspected form.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"custody-access-and-reading-extent\">Custody, access and reading extent</h2>\n<p>The supplier article&#x27;s original HTML is retained as <code>public-claim.html</code> (58,137 bytes; SHA256 <code>1edec8751a3944880d52ffc927caad6e160d73f706313906be556dbe15fb4e36</code>) with a derived plain-text copy. Status: read. Read scope is the substantive article, author and relevant footer links, not the unrelated recommended articles.</p>\n<p>The original opportunity 15487 reader returned a non-retryable safe-opening error. One ordinary GET substitute returned HTTP 200 after redirecting to <code>http[local research file]</code>. Retained <code>public-procurement-15487.html</code> is therefore a generic homepage capture, not a successful procurement capture (22,990 bytes; SHA256 <code>adb1e4071e457420c1e5abb82c830e0ebaea4890a88bc8779303f581b215caa1</code>). Requested-record status: inaccessible by this route; returned page inspected and excluded as substantive procurement evidence. No retry or alternate host was attempted after that substitute.</p>\n<p>The Companies House overview, PUBLIC privacy identity section, Full Fact Chapter 3/footnotes and official FOI inventory were read through the public web reader. Their original response bytes were not retained in this lane. No hashes are claimed for those web-reader-only scopes.</p>\n<p>The existing 262-page CDDP bundle was reused, not downloaded again: <code>../supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09/cddp-foi-bundle.pdf</code>, SHA256 <code>71bd6a522a765d53f9aa79b239134226be64891ea3c67711abc9d788fb87748f</code>. New directly read contract scope: PDF 114–122,180–181,186, with PDF 120 visually inspected. The extract is retained as <code>public-contract-extract.txt</code>; the PDF 120 render as <code>public-page-120.png</code>. Targeted name searches across extracted text found no PUBLIC legal-name variant. This search is a discovery aid, not a full reading of every page and not evidence of absence; redactions and possible names outside the searched variants matter. The unrelated retained <code>public-gcloud-sandbox.pdf</code> was checked only by first page and targeted CDDP/name search; it was not used to support a CDDP relation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"precise-reopening-condition\">Precise reopening condition</h2>\n<p>The discriminating records are the unredacted key-subcontractor entries or buyer approval record for call-off 102548, and the relevant signed PUBLIC statement of work/subcontract, role allocation or accepted deliverable. Likely custodians are DSIT as successor department, Faculty as prime contractor, and the PUBLIC entity that performed the work. These records were not requested from anyone. A genuinely accessible official award/commission record naming PUBLIC or a public delivery artifact explicitly allocating CDDP work to it would also reopen the question. Further general PUBLIC profiles or the separate OSDI consortium would not resolve it.</p>",
        "path": "osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09/public-cddp.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w33-con-s-publicclaim",
          "w33-con-s-publicprivacy",
          "w33-con-s-publiccompany"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded review, 9 September 2026. PUBLIC/CDDP only; OSDI governance and its separate consortium remain in the root lane. No new procurement award or PUBLIC-specific CDDP payment was established. Acquisition stops here for the forest review.\n\n## Finding\n\nPUBLIC itself says it helped deliver three Shared Outcomes Fund projects, including the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform. That supports an attributed claim of participation. It does not specify what PUBLIC delivered for CDDP, whether it held a direct commission or a subcontract, the relevant legal entity, a fee, a work period or an accepted deliverable. The original CDDP procurement link now redirects to the marketplace homepage. The retained official contract, however, exposes a precise missing record: the buyer's approved key-subcontractor identities in the project-management call-off are redacted. That is a credible location where PUBLIC's role might be resolved, without identifying PUBLIC as an obscured entry.\n\nThe current PUBLIC website identifies its controller as PUBLIC Group International Ltd; the Companies House register supplies the exact legal name PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, number 10608507. This establishes a current brand/entity association. It does not prove that this company was the party performing the historical CDDP work.\n\n## What the records actually establish\n\n| Record and exact scope | Supported result | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| PUBLIC, Better collaboration, bigger impact (see source references) substantive article body from its first digital-transformation paragraph through its proposed roundtable; author Mahlet Yared | PUBLIC describes participation in three Shared Outcomes Fund projects over the preceding 24 months, working with more than eight government departments in aggregate. Its CDDP paragraph identifies DCMS as lead and says delivery involved seven departments. The stated purpose is improved cross-government sharing and analysis of disinformation data. | No article publication date appears in the read page or retained date metadata. The current footer's 2025 copyright date and the relative 24-month period cannot supply a historical start/end date. The proposed roundtable is an announcement, without observed delivery or attendance. The aggregate departmental count is not PUBLIC's CDDP-specific customer count. |\n| PUBLIC privacy policy (see source references) heading “As of January 2026” and “Identity and contact details of the data controller” | PUBLIC Group International Ltd, at 1 Horse Guards Avenue, is the named controller for the site. | A website-controller notice is not a CDDP contract or historical commissioning record. |\n| Companies House company 10608507 (see source references) overview identity, status, type and incorporation fields | PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, active private limited company, incorporated 8 February 2017; registered office at PUBLIC Hall, 1 Horse Guards Avenue. | No CDDP activity, payment or subcontract appears in these overview fields. No inference from directors, ownership or other clients was used. |\n| Full Fact Report 2022 (see source references) Chapter 3 paragraph listing CDDP and footnotes 36–38, especially footnote 38 | Full Fact identifies an original DCMS procurement titled Counter Disinformation Data Platform Digital / Technical Project Management Team, dated 26 August 2021, with opportunity 15487. It distinguishes CDDP from the OSDI entry and its consortium in the preceding paragraph. | This is primary evidence of Full Fact's citation, secondary evidence about an original notice that is no longer readable at that route. It does not cite PUBLIC's delivery article or establish an article date. |\n| Disclosed CDDP bundle (see source references) PDF 114–120 / order-form printed 2–8, call-off 102548 | DCMS is buyer and Faculty Science Limited, 08873131, is supplier for the Digital/Technical Project Management Team. PDF 115 dates the order form10 January 2022; PDF 116 states call-off start24 November 2021, expiry31 March 2023. The service encompasses discovery, development and delivery of a prototype. The read schedule includes project/product management, business analysis, service design, data science, legal/security and disinformation advisory roles, plus reports and sprint governance. | Scope breadth makes a specialist contribution possible; it does not assign any role to PUBLIC. The initial phase dates and funding-gated later phase must not be flattened into proof that every listed service was performed. Execution, acceptance and PUBLIC-specific work were not established in this lane. |\n| Same bundle, PDF 120 / printed 8, “Key Subcontractor(s)” | The form says entry into it provides buyer written approval for the listed key subcontractors. The identifying entries immediately below are blacked out. This was visually checked in the original, rather than inferred from blank extracted text. | Do not identify an obscured entry as PUBLIC, count the black bars as a proven count of entities, or call them empty fields. |\n| Same bundle, PDF 180–181 and186, distinct call-off 102887 | This is the CDDP Technical Build Team G-Cloud 12 order, effective11 April 2022, with Faculty Science Ltd as supplier. Its supplier-information field states the subcontractors/partners list is “Not Applicable”. | This is contract-specific. It neither resolves the redacted 102548 subcontractor list nor excludes a separate commission, earlier role or later variation involving PUBLIC. |\n\nThe official FOI release's document inventory (see source references) lists the disclosed Faculty, NewsWhip and Oliver Wyman instruments, while withholding the Discovery Report and Product Operating Model. It is not evidence that PUBLIC never worked on the project. The release page itself has inconsistent displayed chronology: published 28 June 2024, request 25 August 2023, response 25 September 2024. Those labels are preserved rather than silently reconciled. This lane relies on the retained contract text for its dates, not a reconstructed release date.\n\n## Rival explanations and what must not be merged\n\nA PUBLIC contribution as one of the project-management supplier's specialists or approved subcontractors is compatible with both the supplier's claim and the redacted subcontract field. A separate consultancy commission or contribution at another phase is also compatible. A broad marketing description that compresses a narrower contribution remains possible. No obtained record discriminates between these explanations.\n\nThe OSDI Faculty/PUBLIC consortium is evidence about OSDI. It cannot supply the missing CDDP contractual edge. Similarly, the 2022 G-Cloud build order's subcontract field cannot override the distinct project-management order's redacted list. The combined record supports a PUBLIC claim of CDDP involvement alongside an independently documented Faculty commission; it does not yet support a named PUBLIC subcontract, direct DCMS award, CDDP fee, software ownership or government acceptance of PUBLIC work.\n\n## Candidate directional relations\n\n| From → to | Type / stage | Scope and confidence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| PUBLIC brand → CDDP | reports participation in delivery / supplier self-report | Directly read claim; historical period undated and exact contribution unresolved. |\n| PUBLIC website → PUBLIC GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 10608507 | identifies current website controller / website-controller disclosure plus register identity | Strong current association; no backdated CDDP contract identity. |\n| DCMS → Faculty Science Limited 08873131 | commissions through disclosed call-off 102548 / contractual instrument | Digital/Technical Project Management Team; order-form date10 January 2022 and stated start24 November 2021. Separate from performance or acceptance. |\n| DCMS → undisclosed key subcontractor identities | provides approval through102548 order form / redacted identification | Mechanism observed at PDF 120, identities unreadable; keep this as a record-gap relation, not a PUBLIC edge. |\n| DCMS → Faculty Science Ltd | commissions through separate call-off 102887 / contractual instrument | Technical Build Team effective11 April 2022; no listed subcontractor/partner in the inspected form. |\n\n## Custody, access and reading extent\n\nThe supplier article's original HTML is retained as `public-claim.html` (58,137 bytes; SHA256 `1edec8751a3944880d52ffc927caad6e160d73f706313906be556dbe15fb4e36`) with a derived plain-text copy. Status: read. Read scope is the substantive article, author and relevant footer links, not the unrelated recommended articles.\n\nThe original opportunity 15487 reader returned a non-retryable safe-opening error. One ordinary GET substitute returned HTTP 200 after redirecting to `http[local research file]`. Retained `public-procurement-15487.html` is therefore a generic homepage capture, not a successful procurement capture (22,990 bytes; SHA256 `adb1e4071e457420c1e5abb82c830e0ebaea4890a88bc8779303f581b215caa1`). Requested-record status: inaccessible by this route; returned page inspected and excluded as substantive procurement evidence. No retry or alternate host was attempted after that substitute.\n\nThe Companies House overview, PUBLIC privacy identity section, Full Fact Chapter 3/footnotes and official FOI inventory were read through the public web reader. Their original response bytes were not retained in this lane. No hashes are claimed for those web-reader-only scopes.\n\nThe existing 262-page CDDP bundle was reused, not downloaded again: `../supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09/cddp-foi-bundle.pdf`, SHA256 `71bd6a522a765d53f9aa79b239134226be64891ea3c67711abc9d788fb87748f`. New directly read contract scope: PDF 114–122,180–181,186, with PDF 120 visually inspected. The extract is retained as `public-contract-extract.txt`; the PDF 120 render as `public-page-120.png`. Targeted name searches across extracted text found no PUBLIC legal-name variant. This search is a discovery aid, not a full reading of every page and not evidence of absence; redactions and possible names outside the searched variants matter. The unrelated retained `public-gcloud-sandbox.pdf` was checked only by first page and targeted CDDP/name search; it was not used to support a CDDP relation.\n\n## Precise reopening condition\n\nThe discriminating records are the unredacted key-subcontractor entries or buyer approval record for call-off 102548, and the relevant signed PUBLIC statement of work/subcontract, role allocation or accepted deliverable. Likely custodians are DSIT as successor department, Faculty as prime contractor, and the PUBLIC entity that performed the work. These records were not requested from anyone. A genuinely accessible official award/commission record naming PUBLIC or a public delivery artifact explicitly allocating CDDP work to it would also reopen the question. Further general PUBLIC profiles or the separate OSDI consortium would not resolve it.\n",
        "file": "research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation",
        "title": "Stripe implementation — MATCH screening and processing access",
        "description": "9 September 2026. The public implementation counterpart establishes a substantial onward effect: Stripe generally declines MATCH-listed merchants while reserving consideration for documented exceptional circumstances. This is evidence of one provider's published practice. It does not establish a Mastercard rule that every provider must reject every listed bu",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. The public implementation counterpart establishes a substantial onward effect: Stripe generally declines MATCH-listed merchants while reserving consideration for documented exceptional circumstances. This is evidence of one provider&#x27;s published practice. It does not establish a Mastercard rule that every provider must reject every listed business, or loss of access to all banking.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-version-and-reading-scope\">Source, version and reading scope</h2>\n<p>[Stripe, Terminated merchant files](http[local research file] also labelled High risk merchant lists in its navigation. Original HTML retained as <code>acquirer-stripe-match.html</code>, SHA256 <code>b867b5801678b18afc54e0a9b0ea684ca788ac70132239ff19cb97f6979773c7</code>; HTTP 200, 825,132 bytes, captured 2026-09-09 at 17:12:10 UTC. No revision or effective date was displayed in the substantive text. This is an observed current-page account, not a dated historic policy. The locale is English (United Kingdom), but the captured country selector reads United States; it does not identify a UK acquiring-bank contract.</p>\n<p>The complete substantive original text was read, including the separate Visa section to identify the boundary. The operative MATCH scope is <code>acquirer-stripe-match.html.derived.txt</code> lines 88–170; the Visa section is not adopted into the MATCH findings. The primary web reader independently exposed the same text, lines 10–80 in reference <code>turn1482view0</code>. The original HTML is the retained source, and the parsed text is a derivative, not a second publication.</p>\n<h2 id=\"decisive-provisions\">Decisive provisions</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Locator in the retained text</th>\n<th>Scoped finding</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Opening, lines 88–89; qualification, 92–93</td>\n<td>Stripe describes preapproval database screening and qualifying-termination reporting as acquirer duties. Its broader assertion that most processors reject listings is an attributed industry claim, not an independently established frequency.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Information added, 149–162</td>\n<td>The described record includes business and principal-owner identifiers, dates and reason code. Stripe says it does not disclose database information to users. This run obtained no actual merchant record.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Entry removal, 163–168</td>\n<td>Stripe describes removal for erroneous entry or cured PCI noncompliance, through the listing acquirer; it directs merchants unable to identify that acquirer to Mastercard. Its general retention summary is five years. These are Stripe&#x27;s summaries, subject to the current network instrument.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Processing limitations, 169–170</td>\n<td>A listing generally disqualifies Stripe processing. Consideration requires evidence of an exceptional circumstance, with verified identity theft given as an example. This promises consideration, not approval. Resolving excessive-chargeback issues does not by itself permit Stripe to remove the qualifying record.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The example transaction arithmetic elsewhere on the page is expressly hypothetical. It supplies neither a merchant case nor evidence that a particular referral was acted upon. No quantitative eligibility threshold is independently adopted from this page where the current Mastercard manual is the governing source.</p>\n<h2 id=\"comparison-with-the-current-network-instrument\">Comparison with the current network instrument</h2>\n<p>Pinpoint reading of root&#x27;s shared [Security Rules and Procedures—Merchant Edition, 4 August 2026](http[local research file] sharpens the distinction. Section 11.2, PDF/printed page 148, expressly permits acquirers to onboard listed merchants and payment facilitators to onboard listed sponsored merchants. Stripe&#x27;s general disqualification is therefore its stated acceptance practice, not an unavoidable consequence of mandatory database use.</p>\n<p>The summaries also differ. Section 11.5, page 151, specifies five calendar days under its enumerated termination/awareness triggers, versus Stripe&#x27;s one working day. Table 11.4, page 157, uses previous-three-month language and a 1.5% threshold for code 04, versus Stripe&#x27;s monthly 1%; its code 05 period also differs. The manual&#x27;s awkward period wording is not reconstructed into a new formula here. Section 11.13, pages 155–156, places removal with Mastercard and allows the merchant itself to request removal for cured PCI noncompliance if the acquirer is unwilling or unable, following the stated proof process. That alternative is absent from Stripe&#x27;s opening acquirer-only summary.</p>\n<p>These are source/version mismatches, not proof of when rules changed or that Stripe applied the wrong rule in any case. The dated network instrument controls the network-rule description; Stripe remains the primary account of its own published acceptance practice. No additional provider was acquired to manufacture agreement.</p>\n<p>The source is a primary-reader rendition with no original PDF retained. Independently inspected relevant reader passages in the shared <code>rules-chapter11.reader.txt</code> and <code>rules-chapter11-gaps.reader.txt</code>, and pinpoint working-reader references <code>turn1493view1</code> and <code>turn1494view0</code>: section 11.2 final paragraph; sections 11.5 and 11.6; section 11.10; section 11.13; and table 11.4 codes 04–05. This is not a claim to have read the whole manual or independently rendered its pages. Root owns full Chapter 11 review and lifecycle synthesis.</p>\n<h2 id=\"connection-to-the-earlier-policy\">Connection to the earlier policy</h2>\n<p>Reused, without reacquisition, the [Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy](http[local research file] sections 1–2, retained in <code>../wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09/participant-policies.reader.txt</code>, reader lines 161–179. It separately requires investigation and cessation of payment acceptance for a qualifying infringing product, then conditionally requires applicable MATCH listing if the acquirer terminates the merchant. That source remains a retained primary-reader derivative; its ordinary original GET previously failed with 403 and remains closed.</p>\n<p>The supported relationship chain is therefore conditional: an applicable termination can generate a shared record; screening exposes the record to later underwriting; Stripe&#x27;s stated acceptance policy gives that record a further restrictive consequence. This does not prove an ALERT-PAY-specific route into MATCH, a Stripe listing or decision concerning any identified merchant, or that Stripe itself was the acquiring bank which entered a record. A listing, termination of one processing relationship, denial of a new application, and closure of a deposit account are distinct events.</p>\n<p>For integration, useful typed relations are Mastercard MATCH record → Stripe underwriting consideration (<code>provider_published_acceptance_policy</code>), and listing acquirer → merchant record (<code>reported_correction_custodian</code>, qualified by the current Mastercard rules). Do not add WIPO → Stripe, universal bank-denial, or exercised-removal edges from this evidence.</p>\n<h2 id=\"boundary-and-next-discriminator\">Boundary and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>No second implementation source was needed. There were no live database queries, account access, merchant data, operational API calls or submitted forms. The current SPME manual is root&#x27;s separate lane, with the pinpoint comparison above; its ordinary PDF GET failed and a working reader identifies the 4 August 2026 version. No February version date or original-PDF custody is imported here.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to a universal-ban account is differentiated underwriting: the record is shared, but acceptance and exceptional consideration remain provider decisions under the applicable rules. The highest-value missing record is a public, reasoned acquiring or processor decision showing how a MATCH record was assessed, challenged, corrected and reconsidered. A public policy supplies the mechanism; it does not establish its frequency, error rate or a particular customer&#x27;s restoration. Acquisition closes here for the combined forest review.</p>",
        "path": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09/acquirer-implementation.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-stripe-match"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. The public implementation counterpart establishes a substantial onward effect: Stripe generally declines MATCH-listed merchants while reserving consideration for documented exceptional circumstances. This is evidence of one provider's published practice. It does not establish a Mastercard rule that every provider must reject every listed business, or loss of access to all banking.\n\n## Source, version and reading scope\n\nStripe, Terminated merchant files (see source references) also labelled High risk merchant lists in its navigation. Original HTML retained as `acquirer-stripe-match.html`, SHA256 `b867b5801678b18afc54e0a9b0ea684ca788ac70132239ff19cb97f6979773c7`; HTTP 200, 825,132 bytes, captured 2026-09-09 at 17:12:10 UTC. No revision or effective date was displayed in the substantive text. This is an observed current-page account, not a dated historic policy. The locale is English (United Kingdom), but the captured country selector reads United States; it does not identify a UK acquiring-bank contract.\n\nThe complete substantive original text was read, including the separate Visa section to identify the boundary. The operative MATCH scope is `acquirer-stripe-match.html.derived.txt` lines 88–170; the Visa section is not adopted into the MATCH findings. The primary web reader independently exposed the same text, lines 10–80 in reference `turn1482view0`. The original HTML is the retained source, and the parsed text is a derivative, not a second publication.\n\n## Decisive provisions\n\n| Locator in the retained text | Scoped finding |\n| --- | --- |\n| Opening, lines 88–89; qualification, 92–93 | Stripe describes preapproval database screening and qualifying-termination reporting as acquirer duties. Its broader assertion that most processors reject listings is an attributed industry claim, not an independently established frequency. |\n| Information added, 149–162 | The described record includes business and principal-owner identifiers, dates and reason code. Stripe says it does not disclose database information to users. This run obtained no actual merchant record. |\n| Entry removal, 163–168 | Stripe describes removal for erroneous entry or cured PCI noncompliance, through the listing acquirer; it directs merchants unable to identify that acquirer to Mastercard. Its general retention summary is five years. These are Stripe's summaries, subject to the current network instrument. |\n| Processing limitations, 169–170 | A listing generally disqualifies Stripe processing. Consideration requires evidence of an exceptional circumstance, with verified identity theft given as an example. This promises consideration, not approval. Resolving excessive-chargeback issues does not by itself permit Stripe to remove the qualifying record. |\n\nThe example transaction arithmetic elsewhere on the page is expressly hypothetical. It supplies neither a merchant case nor evidence that a particular referral was acted upon. No quantitative eligibility threshold is independently adopted from this page where the current Mastercard manual is the governing source.\n\n## Comparison with the current network instrument\n\nPinpoint reading of root's shared Security Rules and Procedures—Merchant Edition, 4 August 2026 (see source references) sharpens the distinction. Section 11.2, PDF/printed page 148, expressly permits acquirers to onboard listed merchants and payment facilitators to onboard listed sponsored merchants. Stripe's general disqualification is therefore its stated acceptance practice, not an unavoidable consequence of mandatory database use.\n\nThe summaries also differ. Section 11.5, page 151, specifies five calendar days under its enumerated termination/awareness triggers, versus Stripe's one working day. Table 11.4, page 157, uses previous-three-month language and a 1.5% threshold for code 04, versus Stripe's monthly 1%; its code 05 period also differs. The manual's awkward period wording is not reconstructed into a new formula here. Section 11.13, pages 155–156, places removal with Mastercard and allows the merchant itself to request removal for cured PCI noncompliance if the acquirer is unwilling or unable, following the stated proof process. That alternative is absent from Stripe's opening acquirer-only summary.\n\nThese are source/version mismatches, not proof of when rules changed or that Stripe applied the wrong rule in any case. The dated network instrument controls the network-rule description; Stripe remains the primary account of its own published acceptance practice. No additional provider was acquired to manufacture agreement.\n\nThe source is a primary-reader rendition with no original PDF retained. Independently inspected relevant reader passages in the shared `rules-chapter11.reader.txt` and `rules-chapter11-gaps.reader.txt`, and pinpoint working-reader references `turn1493view1` and `turn1494view0`: section 11.2 final paragraph; sections 11.5 and 11.6; section 11.10; section 11.13; and table 11.4 codes 04–05. This is not a claim to have read the whole manual or independently rendered its pages. Root owns full Chapter 11 review and lifecycle synthesis.\n\n## Connection to the earlier policy\n\nReused, without reacquisition, the Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy (see source references) sections 1–2, retained in `../wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09/participant-policies.reader.txt`, reader lines 161–179. It separately requires investigation and cessation of payment acceptance for a qualifying infringing product, then conditionally requires applicable MATCH listing if the acquirer terminates the merchant. That source remains a retained primary-reader derivative; its ordinary original GET previously failed with 403 and remains closed.\n\nThe supported relationship chain is therefore conditional: an applicable termination can generate a shared record; screening exposes the record to later underwriting; Stripe's stated acceptance policy gives that record a further restrictive consequence. This does not prove an ALERT-PAY-specific route into MATCH, a Stripe listing or decision concerning any identified merchant, or that Stripe itself was the acquiring bank which entered a record. A listing, termination of one processing relationship, denial of a new application, and closure of a deposit account are distinct events.\n\nFor integration, useful typed relations are Mastercard MATCH record → Stripe underwriting consideration (`provider_published_acceptance_policy`), and listing acquirer → merchant record (`reported_correction_custodian`, qualified by the current Mastercard rules). Do not add WIPO → Stripe, universal bank-denial, or exercised-removal edges from this evidence.\n\n## Boundary and next discriminator\n\nNo second implementation source was needed. There were no live database queries, account access, merchant data, operational API calls or submitted forms. The current SPME manual is root's separate lane, with the pinpoint comparison above; its ordinary PDF GET failed and a working reader identifies the 4 August 2026 version. No February version date or original-PDF custody is imported here.\n\nThe strongest rival to a universal-ban account is differentiated underwriting: the record is shared, but acceptance and exceptional consideration remain provider decisions under the applicable rules. The highest-value missing record is a public, reasoned acquiring or processor decision showing how a MATCH record was assessed, challenged, corrected and reconsidered. A public policy supplies the mechanism; it does not establish its frequency, error rate or a particular customer's restoration. Acquisition closes here for the combined forest review.\n",
        "file": "research/payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies",
        "title": "MATCH correction, privacy and a worked judicial challenge",
        "description": "Bounded acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This lane inspected the current official privacy notice and one historical court opinion. The root owns the current Security Rules and Procedures; no manual was rehere. Neither MATCH nor a merchant account was accessed.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This lane inspected the current official privacy notice and one historical court opinion. The root owns the current Security Rules and Procedures; no manual was reacquired here. Neither MATCH nor a merchant account was accessed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-current-privacy-route\">The current privacy route</h2>\n<p>The notice effective 16 March 2026 assigns storage/distribution to Mastercard and entry, maintenance and accuracy to financial institutions. Institutions may use a match for additional diligence, safeguards or refusing a contract. Depending on applicable law, individuals can seek access, correction, restriction, objection or deletion and complain to a supervisory authority. California requests go to the relevant institution; elsewhere Mastercard may receive and redirect requests. The notice describes automatic deletion after five years, subject to its legal-retention qualification. It does not promise erasure of independent recipient records or restoration of services. Its final contact paragraph promises a written reply within one month unless law supplies another period; that is not a correction deadline. These rights concern personal information, not an unconditional entitlement to merchant processing. The notice&#x27;s introductory fraud framing should not replace the manual&#x27;s complete eligibility rules. [Official notice](http[local research file] reader lines146-159,171-174,198-206,217-218,257-258; full substantive notice lines140-262 read. Exact paragraphs, including surrounding jurisdiction language, are retained in <code>correction-match-privacy.reader.txt</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-challenge-was-exercised-restoration-is-not-established\">A challenge was exercised; restoration is not established</h2>\n<p>In the unpublished 17 May 2023 opinion <em>eGumball v. Merrick Bank</em>, G060853, the court describes Visa&#x27;s investigation, Merrick&#x27;s termination/reporting and eGumball&#x27;s disputed explanation. On 3 November 2021 the trial court ordered Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal. The mandatory provision was stayed on appeal; the appellate court reversed the TRO because the evidence did not establish the required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing. It expressly reserved that hearing&#x27;s merits and other contested issues. Its record showed only Merrick could request this merchant&#x27;s addition/removal. It also explained that delisting would not itself restore processing: another acquirer still had to approve the merchant. Thus neither the provisional order nor its reversal proves that the listing was false, justified, finally corrected or followed by restored service. [Republished court opinion](http[local research file] factual sectionsIII-VIII; DiscussionIII-IV; Disposition. Decisive reader lines238-244,285-289,303-328, especially311-325. This is a primary judicial text accessed through a republication, not a court-hosted original or a current docket check.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes\">What this changes</h2>\n<p>There are at least three different questions: accuracy of shared personal information, power to change the merchant record, and willingness of another institution to offer service. A remedy at one stage need not resolve the others. The case gives a concrete example of court scrutiny directed at those different roles, while also showing how the requested emergency remedy can fail without determining the underlying dispute.</p>\n<p>No notice-to-prior-recipient or automatic restoration promise was located in the inspected privacy instrument. Applicable law or other rules may impose additional obligations; this lane did not audit those regimes. A current rule allowing correction is also not evidence that the correction channel worked in a particular case. Conversely, the unsuccessful TRO does not establish that meaningful correction is impossible.</p>\n<p>The next useful evidence would be an attributable completed correction: the responsible institution&#x27;s decision, resulting MATCH status and notice to earlier recipients, separately from a subsequent onboarding decision. For eGumball specifically, a later final disposition or court-filed removal confirmation would settle much more than another summary of the 2023 procedural ruling. No ALERT-PAY, adult-content or NGO involvement in this dispute was established or inferred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-finite-frontier\">Custody and finite frontier</h2>\n<p>Seven discovery queries were used: <code>MATCH Mastercard terminated merchant list court removal acquirer decision privacy</code>; <code>site.ftc.gov Mastercard MATCH terminated merchant list</code>; <code>site.courtlistener.com Mastercard MATCH removal merchant</code>; <code>&quot;Mastercard&quot; &quot;MATCH&quot; &quot;removal&quot; court injunction merchant</code>; <code>&quot;MATCH list&quot; &quot;removed&quot; court judgment Mastercard</code>; <code>&quot;eGumball&quot; &quot;G062863&quot; site:courts.ca.gov</code>; <code>&quot;eGumball&quot; &quot;G060853&quot; opinion court PDF</code>. Other search returns were not treated as acquired findings. In particular, anonymous accounts of removal were not used. The later same-case G062863M anti-SLAPP decision appeared as an unread search lead; no final merits/removal outcome was inferred from it. Other FTC and merchant cases were not opened into new branches.</p>\n<p>No court-hosted eGumball original was located by the finite official-domain search. The one selected public opinion republication was read as a credible substitute. Ordinary GETs of both the Mastercard notice and Casemine page returned403; those error bytes are retained and clearly labeled. Their successful public web-reader results were retained instead, with source URL and exact reader locators. There was no alternate-domain or language attempt after failure. The privacy reader contains the complete substantive notice; the opinion capture combines actually returned lines116-161 and173-330, leaving the unreturned162-172 gap explicit. This is scoped reading, not an original court docket, underlying-exhibit inspection, audio/video review or proof of present merchant status.</p>\n<p><code>correction-captures.json</code> identifies the error responses, derivative captures, hashes, dates and read scope. No canonical case, reader, ZIP or other lane&#x27;s packet was changed.</p>",
        "path": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09/correction-remedies.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-privacy",
          "w30-class-s-egumball2023"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This lane inspected the current official privacy notice and one historical court opinion. The root owns the current Security Rules and Procedures; no manual was reacquired here. Neither MATCH nor a merchant account was accessed.\n\n## The current privacy route\n\nThe notice effective 16 March 2026 assigns storage/distribution to Mastercard and entry, maintenance and accuracy to financial institutions. Institutions may use a match for additional diligence, safeguards or refusing a contract. Depending on applicable law, individuals can seek access, correction, restriction, objection or deletion and complain to a supervisory authority. California requests go to the relevant institution; elsewhere Mastercard may receive and redirect requests. The notice describes automatic deletion after five years, subject to its legal-retention qualification. It does not promise erasure of independent recipient records or restoration of services. Its final contact paragraph promises a written reply within one month unless law supplies another period; that is not a correction deadline. These rights concern personal information, not an unconditional entitlement to merchant processing. The notice's introductory fraud framing should not replace the manual's complete eligibility rules. Official notice (see source references) reader lines146-159,171-174,198-206,217-218,257-258; full substantive notice lines140-262 read. Exact paragraphs, including surrounding jurisdiction language, are retained in `correction-match-privacy.reader.txt`.\n\n## A challenge was exercised; restoration is not established\n\nIn the unpublished 17 May 2023 opinion *eGumball v. Merrick Bank*, G060853, the court describes Visa's investigation, Merrick's termination/reporting and eGumball's disputed explanation. On 3 November 2021 the trial court ordered Merrick, Paysafe and Visa to request removal. The mandatory provision was stayed on appeal; the appellate court reversed the TRO because the evidence did not establish the required interim harm before a preliminary-injunction hearing. It expressly reserved that hearing's merits and other contested issues. Its record showed only Merrick could request this merchant's addition/removal. It also explained that delisting would not itself restore processing: another acquirer still had to approve the merchant. Thus neither the provisional order nor its reversal proves that the listing was false, justified, finally corrected or followed by restored service. Republished court opinion (see source references) factual sectionsIII-VIII; DiscussionIII-IV; Disposition. Decisive reader lines238-244,285-289,303-328, especially311-325. This is a primary judicial text accessed through a republication, not a court-hosted original or a current docket check.\n\n## What this changes\n\nThere are at least three different questions: accuracy of shared personal information, power to change the merchant record, and willingness of another institution to offer service. A remedy at one stage need not resolve the others. The case gives a concrete example of court scrutiny directed at those different roles, while also showing how the requested emergency remedy can fail without determining the underlying dispute.\n\nNo notice-to-prior-recipient or automatic restoration promise was located in the inspected privacy instrument. Applicable law or other rules may impose additional obligations; this lane did not audit those regimes. A current rule allowing correction is also not evidence that the correction channel worked in a particular case. Conversely, the unsuccessful TRO does not establish that meaningful correction is impossible.\n\nThe next useful evidence would be an attributable completed correction: the responsible institution's decision, resulting MATCH status and notice to earlier recipients, separately from a subsequent onboarding decision. For eGumball specifically, a later final disposition or court-filed removal confirmation would settle much more than another summary of the 2023 procedural ruling. No ALERT-PAY, adult-content or NGO involvement in this dispute was established or inferred.\n\n## Custody and finite frontier\n\nSeven discovery queries were used: `MATCH Mastercard terminated merchant list court removal acquirer decision privacy`; `site.ftc.gov Mastercard MATCH terminated merchant list`; `site.courtlistener.com Mastercard MATCH removal merchant`; `\"Mastercard\" \"MATCH\" \"removal\" court injunction merchant`; `\"MATCH list\" \"removed\" court judgment Mastercard`; `\"eGumball\" \"G062863\" site:courts.ca.gov`; `\"eGumball\" \"G060853\" opinion court PDF`. Other search returns were not treated as acquired findings. In particular, anonymous accounts of removal were not used. The later same-case G062863M anti-SLAPP decision appeared as an unread search lead; no final merits/removal outcome was inferred from it. Other FTC and merchant cases were not opened into new branches.\n\nNo court-hosted eGumball original was located by the finite official-domain search. The one selected public opinion republication was read as a credible substitute. Ordinary GETs of both the Mastercard notice and Casemine page returned403; those error bytes are retained and clearly labeled. Their successful public web-reader results were retained instead, with source URL and exact reader locators. There was no alternate-domain or language attempt after failure. The privacy reader contains the complete substantive notice; the opinion capture combines actually returned lines116-161 and173-330, leaving the unreturned162-172 gap explicit. This is scoped reading, not an original court docket, underlying-exhibit inspection, audio/video review or proof of present merchant status.\n\n`correction-captures.json` identifies the error responses, derivative captures, hashes, dates and read scope. No canonical case, reader, ZIP or other lane's packet was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-correction-remedies.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle",
        "title": "MATCH Pro: required information sharing, independent admission, and correction duties",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition is closed for review. These are public rules, not operational records, an individual merchant's status or an ALERT-PAY agreement. The specific route connecting WIPO's programme to Mastercard remains not obtained.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root acquisition is closed for review. These are public rules, not operational records, an individual merchant&#x27;s status or an ALERT-PAY agreement. The specific route connecting WIPO&#x27;s programme to Mastercard remains unacquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-and-version\">Source and version</h2>\n<p>The successful official reader now displays Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition, dated 4 August 2026, with 236 pages: http[local research file] . The initial search extract described 3 February 2026; that older indexed date must not govern the following passages. The ordinary GET returned 403 HTML, correctly named rules-spme2026.error.html. No original PDF was retained and that route is closed.</p>\n<p>Root read the title and continuous Chapter 11 text, PDF pages 147–158, reader lines 5380–5822, across the two saved overlapping reader files. The coverage check proves retained text continuity only. No page image, live system or complete 236-page manual was inspected. Tables are reader-supported, without a facsimile check.</p>\n<p>The public rules index also failed ordinary GET but succeeded in the official reader: http[local research file] . Root read its complete substantive rules, disclaimer and programme sections. It warns that public documents may not be entirely current and that Mastercard&#x27;s authoritative standards prevail. This is therefore a dated public edition, not a certified complete current contract set. Chapter 11 ends with a privacy heading and a short introductory sentence; Chapter 12 is expressly omitted. This does not establish why material is omitted or that no other privacy rules exist. The separate public privacy notice is covered by the remedy lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-reports-and-who-admits-the-next-merchant\">Who reports, and who admits the next merchant</h2>\n<p>Sections 11.1–3 describe a mandatory acquirer system carrying reports about certain terminated merchants and their owners. Authorized roles include approved acquirers and appropriately registered processors, payment facilitators and data-storage providers. Service-provider access requires acquirer approval and appropriate registration/provisioning. No actual authorization was inspected.</p>\n<p>Sections 11.2 and 11.6.4 explicitly permit an acquirer to onboard a listed merchant; section 11.2 also permits a payment facilitator to onboard a listed sponsored merchant. Section 11.6 requires an inquiry before signing an agreement or enabling acceptance. Mandatory inquiry is not mandatory rejection. The chapter supplies noncompliance consequences for failures to use, report or inquire. A provider may adopt a stricter admission policy, as Stripe&#x27;s separate guidance illustrates. A processor service, an acquiring relationship, card acceptance and ordinary bank-account access remain different things.</p>\n<h2 id=\"entry-timing-and-responsibility\">Entry, timing and responsibility</h2>\n<p>Section 11.5 combines an act to terminate by either the acquirer or merchant with the acquirer&#x27;s reason to believe a listed condition exists. It specifies five calendar days from the earlier of its enumerated events: the acquirer&#x27;s termination decision, receipt of the merchant&#x27;s termination decision, or awareness of an issue meeting a reason code. The third item must not be detached from the opening condition. The effective termination date is explicitly not controlling. A merchant-initiated exit can still qualify; every exit does not.</p>\n<p>Section 11.4 leaves accuracy responsibility with the acquirer even when a service provider handles work. It requires good faith and reasonable conduct, prohibits using MATCH as a collection threat for minor discretionary activity, and requires a defined reason to be met or suspected at the termination decision. Failure to correct erroneous data within a reasonable period can attract assessments. It also requires supplying the listing acquirer identifier and reason code to the merchant or another acquirer, and maintaining working contacts. These are duties, not observed compliance.</p>\n<p>Removal requests require a response within 30 calendar days; questions about a listing require a response within seven. A response is not a removal guarantee. Section 11.5.1 expressly permits a merchant to request removal without legal counsel and identifies the required information. No request was prepared or sent.</p>\n<h2 id=\"how-the-record-travels\">How the record travels</h2>\n<p>The system can associate up to five principal owners with a merchant and search using exact or phonetic/spelling-variant matches. Those are possible identity matches, not findings of new misconduct. Section 11.4 requires checking relevance, with special care for identity-theft reason code 14: a legitimate owner may not know someone previously used their identity. No person&#x27;s record was queried.</p>\n<p>Section 11.6.4 describes retroactive alerts when another authorized user adds information after an initial inquiry, within the following 365 days. The alert remains visible for 30 days and is reported once in batch results. Recipients assess appropriate next steps; the text again allows onboarding. This is a documented route for later information to reach other institutions, not a demonstrated cascade of closures. No API, testing facility or production service was operated. The chapter&#x27;s test-environment rules do not establish that this investigation performed any test.</p>\n<h2 id=\"several-different-retention-and-correction-clocks\">Several different retention and correction clocks</h2>\n<p>Section 11.10 provides five-year retention and automatic purge for merchant listings. Separately, authorized users must retain their own relevant MATCH records for at least two years after the underlying agreement ends; system inquiry records last 365 days. Database purge therefore cannot by itself prove deletion of every recipient&#x27;s records, reversal of its assessment or restored processing.</p>\n<p>Section 11.13 permits early removal when an authorized user reports an erroneous addition, or when reason-code-12 PCI security noncompliance has been remedied with specified confirmation and validation. For the PCI route, the merchant can apply directly if the acquirer is unwilling or unable, with the same proof requirements. This is a narrow alternative, not a general bypass for every dispute. The chapter does not expressly make later business reform a removal ground for every other reason code; it also does not establish that external privacy, contractual or judicial remedies are unavailable.</p>\n<p>Correcting a report, removing a listing and obtaining new processing are distinct outcomes. The public case and privacy lane tests the latter stages separately.</p>\n<h2 id=\"scope-and-source-differences\">Scope and source differences</h2>\n<p>Table 11.4 covers several kinds of risk and misconduct, including compromised data, transaction laundering, chargebacks/fraud, coercion, insolvency, standards violations, PCI compliance, illegal transactions and identity theft. Some descriptions expressly address American Express reports. That is evidence of a cross-network reporting category, not proof of Visa sharing or every brand&#x27;s rules. The table does not identify which code an ALERT-PAY or IP case would actually use.</p>\n<p>Stripe&#x27;s undated public guidance summarizes a one-working-day reporting requirement and different chargeback/fraud periods or thresholds; the August manual specifies five calendar days under its listed triggers and different table wording. This is a documented source mismatch. No amendment notice or exact change date was acquired. A stricter provider deadline could coexist with a network limit; each statement needs its own attribution. The dated manual is stronger evidence for the public network rule than a provider&#x27;s general summary, subject to the manual&#x27;s own currency caveat.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes\">What this changes</h2>\n<p>The shared system combines mandatory reporting and inquiry with recipient discretion, possible identity matches, conditional removal and separate retention rules. It can affect access across institutions without a universal instruction to refuse every listed business. Its explicit duties also provide concrete standards against which practice can be tested. The revealing missing evidence is a worked report, recipient assessment, challenge and outcome, including whether correction reached the recipient. There is no established universal loss of banking, automatic account closure or intent to target a particular group in this packet.</p>",
        "path": "payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09/rules-lifecycle.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-match-rules"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition is closed for review. These are public rules, not operational records, an individual merchant's status or an ALERT-PAY agreement. The specific route connecting WIPO's programme to Mastercard remains unacquired.\n\n## Source and version\n\nThe successful official reader now displays Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition, dated 4 August 2026, with 236 pages: http[local research file] . The initial search extract described 3 February 2026; that older indexed date must not govern the following passages. The ordinary GET returned 403 HTML, correctly named rules-spme2026.error.html. No original PDF was retained and that route is closed.\n\nRoot read the title and continuous Chapter 11 text, PDF pages 147–158, reader lines 5380–5822, across the two saved overlapping reader files. The coverage check proves retained text continuity only. No page image, live system or complete 236-page manual was inspected. Tables are reader-supported, without a facsimile check.\n\nThe public rules index also failed ordinary GET but succeeded in the official reader: http[local research file] . Root read its complete substantive rules, disclaimer and programme sections. It warns that public documents may not be entirely current and that Mastercard's authoritative standards prevail. This is therefore a dated public edition, not a certified complete current contract set. Chapter 11 ends with a privacy heading and a short introductory sentence; Chapter 12 is expressly omitted. This does not establish why material is omitted or that no other privacy rules exist. The separate public privacy notice is covered by the remedy lane.\n\n## Who reports, and who admits the next merchant\n\nSections 11.1–3 describe a mandatory acquirer system carrying reports about certain terminated merchants and their owners. Authorized roles include approved acquirers and appropriately registered processors, payment facilitators and data-storage providers. Service-provider access requires acquirer approval and appropriate registration/provisioning. No actual authorization was inspected.\n\nSections 11.2 and 11.6.4 explicitly permit an acquirer to onboard a listed merchant; section 11.2 also permits a payment facilitator to onboard a listed sponsored merchant. Section 11.6 requires an inquiry before signing an agreement or enabling acceptance. Mandatory inquiry is not mandatory rejection. The chapter supplies noncompliance consequences for failures to use, report or inquire. A provider may adopt a stricter admission policy, as Stripe's separate guidance illustrates. A processor service, an acquiring relationship, card acceptance and ordinary bank-account access remain different things.\n\n## Entry, timing and responsibility\n\nSection 11.5 combines an act to terminate by either the acquirer or merchant with the acquirer's reason to believe a listed condition exists. It specifies five calendar days from the earlier of its enumerated events: the acquirer's termination decision, receipt of the merchant's termination decision, or awareness of an issue meeting a reason code. The third item must not be detached from the opening condition. The effective termination date is explicitly not controlling. A merchant-initiated exit can still qualify; every exit does not.\n\nSection 11.4 leaves accuracy responsibility with the acquirer even when a service provider handles work. It requires good faith and reasonable conduct, prohibits using MATCH as a collection threat for minor discretionary activity, and requires a defined reason to be met or suspected at the termination decision. Failure to correct erroneous data within a reasonable period can attract assessments. It also requires supplying the listing acquirer identifier and reason code to the merchant or another acquirer, and maintaining working contacts. These are duties, not observed compliance.\n\nRemoval requests require a response within 30 calendar days; questions about a listing require a response within seven. A response is not a removal guarantee. Section 11.5.1 expressly permits a merchant to request removal without legal counsel and identifies the required information. No request was prepared or sent.\n\n## How the record travels\n\nThe system can associate up to five principal owners with a merchant and search using exact or phonetic/spelling-variant matches. Those are possible identity matches, not findings of new misconduct. Section 11.4 requires checking relevance, with special care for identity-theft reason code 14: a legitimate owner may not know someone previously used their identity. No person's record was queried.\n\nSection 11.6.4 describes retroactive alerts when another authorized user adds information after an initial inquiry, within the following 365 days. The alert remains visible for 30 days and is reported once in batch results. Recipients assess appropriate next steps; the text again allows onboarding. This is a documented route for later information to reach other institutions, not a demonstrated cascade of closures. No API, testing facility or production service was operated. The chapter's test-environment rules do not establish that this investigation performed any test.\n\n## Several different retention and correction clocks\n\nSection 11.10 provides five-year retention and automatic purge for merchant listings. Separately, authorized users must retain their own relevant MATCH records for at least two years after the underlying agreement ends; system inquiry records last 365 days. Database purge therefore cannot by itself prove deletion of every recipient's records, reversal of its assessment or restored processing.\n\nSection 11.13 permits early removal when an authorized user reports an erroneous addition, or when reason-code-12 PCI security noncompliance has been remedied with specified confirmation and validation. For the PCI route, the merchant can apply directly if the acquirer is unwilling or unable, with the same proof requirements. This is a narrow alternative, not a general bypass for every dispute. The chapter does not expressly make later business reform a removal ground for every other reason code; it also does not establish that external privacy, contractual or judicial remedies are unavailable.\n\nCorrecting a report, removing a listing and obtaining new processing are distinct outcomes. The public case and privacy lane tests the latter stages separately.\n\n## Scope and source differences\n\nTable 11.4 covers several kinds of risk and misconduct, including compromised data, transaction laundering, chargebacks/fraud, coercion, insolvency, standards violations, PCI compliance, illegal transactions and identity theft. Some descriptions expressly address American Express reports. That is evidence of a cross-network reporting category, not proof of Visa sharing or every brand's rules. The table does not identify which code an ALERT-PAY or IP case would actually use.\n\nStripe's undated public guidance summarizes a one-working-day reporting requirement and different chargeback/fraud periods or thresholds; the August manual specifies five calendar days under its listed triggers and different table wording. This is a documented source mismatch. No amendment notice or exact change date was acquired. A stricter provider deadline could coexist with a network limit; each statement needs its own attribution. The dated manual is stronger evidence for the public network rule than a provider's general summary, subject to the manual's own currency caveat.\n\n## What this changes\n\nThe shared system combines mandatory reporting and inquiry with recipient discretion, possible identity matches, conditional removal and separate retention rules. It can affect access across institutions without a universal instruction to refuse every listed business. Its explicit duties also provide concrete standards against which practice can be tested. The revealing missing evidence is a worked report, recipient assessment, challenge and outcome, including whether correction reached the recipient. There is no established universal loss of banking, automatic account closure or intent to target a particular group in this packet.\n",
        "file": "research/payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-rules-lifecycle.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing",
        "title": "Tech Coalition PhotoDNA sublicensing: delegated access, undisclosed decision terms",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet owns the Coalition selection/authority lane. It does not determine Microsoft SDK/cloud terms or NCMEC hash access, which are separate lanes. No application, account, software execution, media, hash list, outreach or payment was attempted.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet owns the Coalition selection/authority lane. It does not determine Microsoft SDK/cloud terms or NCMEC hash access, which are separate lanes. No application, account, software execution, media, hash list, outreach or payment was attempted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-established\">What is established</h2>\n<p>The Coalition is a publicly acknowledged licensing intermediary. Its [2023 annual report](http[local research file] reproduces a statement attributed to Microsoft describing provision of PhotoDNA for the Coalition to license to its members. This is a counterparty-attributed statement in the recipient&#x27;s report, not the original interparty agreement.</p>\n<p>The [2024 annual report](http[local research file] dates becoming a sublicensor to 2023 and extending sublicenses to qualifying non-members to 2024. PDF13/printed13 separately reports integrating PhotoDNA with open-source Hasher-Matcher-Actioner for already licensed companies, alongside a Microsoft statement attributed to Liz Thomas supporting the licensing arrangement. Thus non-membership access predates the January 2025 announcement below. These are retrospective programme accounts; no individual executed sublicense or exact grant date appears in the acquired passages. Page28 also describes companies acting on content under their own policies and procedures. Neither integration nor access establishes a common removal instruction.</p>\n<p>The [27 January 2025 announcement](http[local research file] says the Coalition expanded its agreement for Microsoft&#x27;s updated technology. It reports licensing scope extended beyond CSAM to terrorist content and adults&#x27; non-consensual intimate imagery. Its implementation section invites member and non-member licensing inquiries, offers the code without charge and describes responses as typically arriving within a week. That is a response estimate, not a guaranteed licence award or observed turnaround. It offers implementation assistance and separately ongoing support for members. Compatibility with NCMEC, GIFCT and StopNCII is claimed; access to those bodies&#x27; data is not granted by that sentence. This page publishes neither the Microsoft–Coalition agreement nor an applicant contract or approval rubric. Its promotional privacy and effectiveness statements are not treated here as independent technical findings.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-public-intake-is-not-the-sublicense-contract\">The public intake is not the sublicense contract</h2>\n<p>The [current Pathways page](http[local research file] retained earlier on 9 September 2026 and reread in full, permits employees of technology companies hosting or providing access to user content or communications. It excludes vendors/service providers without that function and staff of existing Coalition members. Staff review submitted information for eligibility. Participation is free and does not require or guarantee later membership. A separate opportunity allows companies to apply for a PhotoDNA sublicense. These are Pathways admission conditions; the acquired page does not establish that every participant receives a licence or that its exclusions govern the separate member licensing route. Intake labels include sector, products, region, company size and confidentiality consent; no form was submitted.</p>\n<p>The [nine published non-member account terms](http[local research file] govern the site and mentoring. Clauses1–4 cover discretionary updates, reasonable-effort information responses, accurate registration and a revocable, nontransferable site licence with limited copying permissions. Clauses5–6 cover mentoring confidentiality. Clause7 preserves voluntary use and the participant&#x27;s decision whether/how to use materials, disclaims creation of a legal/community standard, and recommends the participant&#x27;s own legal review. Clauses8–9 address severability and dispute rules. These are actual published conditions on resources. Their site-licence revocability cannot be transplanted into PhotoDNA&#x27;s unknown sublicense withdrawal terms. The published document is not evidence that any particular company assented or was sanctioned. Its current capture has no established publication/revision date.</p>\n<h2 id=\"authority-map-and-competing-interpretations\">Authority map and competing interpretations</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Typed relationship</th>\n<th>Supported state</th>\n<th>What it does not establish</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Microsoft → Tech Coalition: sublicensing delegation</td>\n<td>Coalition&#x27;s retrospective programme accounts, including attributed Microsoft statements, and January 2025 expansion announcement</td>\n<td>Full delegated powers, Microsoft reserved approval, revocation, audit or downstream-use clauses</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tech Coalition → applicants: licensing route</td>\n<td>Member/non-member inquiries, free code, administrative response estimate</td>\n<td>Named decision-maker, licence guaranteed by eligibility, a particular granted/denied licence</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tech Coalition → Pathways participants: selective resource access</td>\n<td>Published admission criteria, staff review and site/mentoring terms</td>\n<td>These conditions are the PhotoDNA contract or admission confers membership/hash access</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tech Coalition → licensed implementers: integration support</td>\n<td>2024 HMA integration and 2025 assistance announcement</td>\n<td>PhotoDNA itself is open source, automatic access to reference hashes, or mandated production configuration</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Provider → its content decisions: retained implementation role</td>\n<td>Reported use under provider policies; voluntary-materials clause</td>\n<td>Unqualified freedom from separate contracts or applicable law</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A concrete intermediary can reduce transaction and engineering costs while retaining an administrative gate. Both features are visible. The currently acquired public evidence cannot distinguish routine eligibility/safety screening from broader discretion in actual licence decisions. It also cannot establish donor or member influence over an individual grant or refusal. The published non-member route is evidence against treating paid membership as universally necessary for access.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-search-result-and-discriminating-missing-records\">Finite search result and discriminating missing records</h2>\n<p>Six distinct discovery queries were attempted: <code>site:technologycoalition.org &quot;PhotoDNA&quot; license</code>; the same domain with <code>&quot;PhotoDNA&quot; sublicense</code>; the same domain with <code>&quot;PhotoDNA&quot; eligibility</code>; <code>&quot;PhotoDNA&quot; &quot;Tech Coalition&quot; &quot;sublicense&quot; -site:technologycoalition.org</code>; <code>&quot;PhotoDNA&quot; &quot;Tech Coalition&quot; eligibility approval license denied agreement</code>; and <code>&quot;PhotoDNA&quot; &quot;Tech Coalition&quot; (&quot;license granted&quot; OR &quot;sublicensed&quot; OR &quot;denied&quot; OR &quot;rejected&quot; OR &quot;licensing agreement&quot;)</code>. The initial three-query response was wholly truncated and not used as evidence; the sublicense query was rerun. Later visible results identified the announcement and annual reports; the last exact decision query returned no results. Not every returned snippet/link was opened. A proxy-hosted OpenAI result and third-party/LinkedIn snippets were not acquired or treated as original records. No licence recipient was inferred from an adoption count, HMA use or membership testimonial.</p>\n<p>No public selection rubric, named issued/denied Coalition sublicense, executed applicant agreement, or licence review/revocation procedure was located within this finite scope. This is a bounded search result, not proof that none exists. The decisive next records are the Microsoft–Coalition delegation and current applicant sublicense/template, with any eligibility schedule; these would locate reserved approvals, permitted purposes, term, termination, derivative/code distribution, data access and reporting conditions. A dated executed licence or refusal/appeal correspondence would then establish how those powers were exercised. Likely custodians are Microsoft, the Coalition and the relevant applicant. No request was made.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-exact-reading-extent\">Custody and exact reading extent</h2>\n<p><code>coalition-captures.json</code> records three new successful official originals, plus two reused Pathways originals with verified hashes and prior-manifest ancestry. The 2025 announcement&#x27;s full substantive body was read through the primary web reader and retained HTML-derived text. Both reports were text-searched in full for PhotoDNA/sublicensing; complete extracted text of 2023 PDF10/20 and 2024 PDF13/28/29/35 was read. Only the licensing/provider-policy passages identified above support this packet; chart graphics and other report pages were not substantively inspected. The Pathways substantive programme/FAQ/intake labels and all nine account terms were reread from retained derivatives. Original HTML/PDF bytes remain distinct from derived text. All three new ordinary public GETs succeeded; no failed access route or known closed source was retried. Acquisition stops here for the combined forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09/coalition-sublicensing.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-tc-annual2023",
          "w28-access-s-tc-annual2024",
          "w28-access-s-tc-expanded2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. This packet owns the Coalition selection/authority lane. It does not determine Microsoft SDK/cloud terms or NCMEC hash access, which are separate lanes. No application, account, software execution, media, hash list, outreach or payment was attempted.\n\n## What is established\n\nThe Coalition is a publicly acknowledged licensing intermediary. Its 2023 annual report (see source references) reproduces a statement attributed to Microsoft describing provision of PhotoDNA for the Coalition to license to its members. This is a counterparty-attributed statement in the recipient's report, not the original interparty agreement.\n\nThe 2024 annual report (see source references) dates becoming a sublicensor to 2023 and extending sublicenses to qualifying non-members to 2024. PDF13/printed13 separately reports integrating PhotoDNA with open-source Hasher-Matcher-Actioner for already licensed companies, alongside a Microsoft statement attributed to Liz Thomas supporting the licensing arrangement. Thus non-membership access predates the January 2025 announcement below. These are retrospective programme accounts; no individual executed sublicense or exact grant date appears in the acquired passages. Page28 also describes companies acting on content under their own policies and procedures. Neither integration nor access establishes a common removal instruction.\n\nThe 27 January 2025 announcement (see source references) says the Coalition expanded its agreement for Microsoft's updated technology. It reports licensing scope extended beyond CSAM to terrorist content and adults' non-consensual intimate imagery. Its implementation section invites member and non-member licensing inquiries, offers the code without charge and describes responses as typically arriving within a week. That is a response estimate, not a guaranteed licence award or observed turnaround. It offers implementation assistance and separately ongoing support for members. Compatibility with NCMEC, GIFCT and StopNCII is claimed; access to those bodies' data is not granted by that sentence. This page publishes neither the Microsoft–Coalition agreement nor an applicant contract or approval rubric. Its promotional privacy and effectiveness statements are not treated here as independent technical findings.\n\n## The public intake is not the sublicense contract\n\nThe current Pathways page (see source references) retained earlier on 9 September 2026 and reread in full, permits employees of technology companies hosting or providing access to user content or communications. It excludes vendors/service providers without that function and staff of existing Coalition members. Staff review submitted information for eligibility. Participation is free and does not require or guarantee later membership. A separate opportunity allows companies to apply for a PhotoDNA sublicense. These are Pathways admission conditions; the acquired page does not establish that every participant receives a licence or that its exclusions govern the separate member licensing route. Intake labels include sector, products, region, company size and confidentiality consent; no form was submitted.\n\nThe nine published non-member account terms (see source references) govern the site and mentoring. Clauses1–4 cover discretionary updates, reasonable-effort information responses, accurate registration and a revocable, nontransferable site licence with limited copying permissions. Clauses5–6 cover mentoring confidentiality. Clause7 preserves voluntary use and the participant's decision whether/how to use materials, disclaims creation of a legal/community standard, and recommends the participant's own legal review. Clauses8–9 address severability and dispute rules. These are actual published conditions on resources. Their site-licence revocability cannot be transplanted into PhotoDNA's unknown sublicense withdrawal terms. The published document is not evidence that any particular company assented or was sanctioned. Its current capture has no established publication/revision date.\n\n## Authority map and competing interpretations\n\n| Typed relationship | Supported state | What it does not establish |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Microsoft → Tech Coalition: sublicensing delegation | Coalition's retrospective programme accounts, including attributed Microsoft statements, and January 2025 expansion announcement | Full delegated powers, Microsoft reserved approval, revocation, audit or downstream-use clauses |\n| Tech Coalition → applicants: licensing route | Member/non-member inquiries, free code, administrative response estimate | Named decision-maker, licence guaranteed by eligibility, a particular granted/denied licence |\n| Tech Coalition → Pathways participants: selective resource access | Published admission criteria, staff review and site/mentoring terms | These conditions are the PhotoDNA contract or admission confers membership/hash access |\n| Tech Coalition → licensed implementers: integration support | 2024 HMA integration and 2025 assistance announcement | PhotoDNA itself is open source, automatic access to reference hashes, or mandated production configuration |\n| Provider → its content decisions: retained implementation role | Reported use under provider policies; voluntary-materials clause | Unqualified freedom from separate contracts or applicable law |\n\nA concrete intermediary can reduce transaction and engineering costs while retaining an administrative gate. Both features are visible. The currently acquired public evidence cannot distinguish routine eligibility/safety screening from broader discretion in actual licence decisions. It also cannot establish donor or member influence over an individual grant or refusal. The published non-member route is evidence against treating paid membership as universally necessary for access.\n\n## Finite search result and discriminating missing records\n\nSix distinct discovery queries were attempted: `site:technologycoalition.org \"PhotoDNA\" license`; the same domain with `\"PhotoDNA\" sublicense`; the same domain with `\"PhotoDNA\" eligibility`; `\"PhotoDNA\" \"Tech Coalition\" \"sublicense\" -site:technologycoalition.org`; `\"PhotoDNA\" \"Tech Coalition\" eligibility approval license denied agreement`; and `\"PhotoDNA\" \"Tech Coalition\" (\"license granted\" OR \"sublicensed\" OR \"denied\" OR \"rejected\" OR \"licensing agreement\")`. The initial three-query response was wholly truncated and not used as evidence; the sublicense query was rerun. Later visible results identified the announcement and annual reports; the last exact decision query returned no results. Not every returned snippet/link was opened. A proxy-hosted OpenAI result and third-party/LinkedIn snippets were not acquired or treated as original records. No licence recipient was inferred from an adoption count, HMA use or membership testimonial.\n\nNo public selection rubric, named issued/denied Coalition sublicense, executed applicant agreement, or licence review/revocation procedure was located within this finite scope. This is a bounded search result, not proof that none exists. The decisive next records are the Microsoft–Coalition delegation and current applicant sublicense/template, with any eligibility schedule; these would locate reserved approvals, permitted purposes, term, termination, derivative/code distribution, data access and reporting conditions. A dated executed licence or refusal/appeal correspondence would then establish how those powers were exercised. Likely custodians are Microsoft, the Coalition and the relevant applicant. No request was made.\n\n## Custody and exact reading extent\n\n`coalition-captures.json` records three new successful official originals, plus two reused Pathways originals with verified hashes and prior-manifest ancestry. The 2025 announcement's full substantive body was read through the primary web reader and retained HTML-derived text. Both reports were text-searched in full for PhotoDNA/sublicensing; complete extracted text of 2023 PDF10/20 and 2024 PDF13/28/29/35 was read. Only the licensing/provider-policy passages identified above support this packet; chart graphics and other report pages were not substantively inspected. The Pathways substantive programme/FAQ/intake labels and all nine account terms were reread from retained derivatives. Original HTML/PDF bytes remain distinct from derived text. All three new ordinary public GETs succeeded; no failed access route or known closed source was retried. Acquisition stops here for the combined forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-coalition-sublicensing.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing",
        "title": "Microsoft PhotoDNA: software, hosted service and reference-data access",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed after six focused queries and the named primary pages below. This is an administrative-document review, not a service test or a complete licence audit.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed after six focused queries and the named primary pages below. This is an administrative-document review, not a service test or a complete licence audit.</p>\n<p>The evidence supports conditional access through different instruments. It does not establish a public entitlement to PhotoDNA, a licence refusal against a named applicant, or permission to obtain every reference-hash collection. The dates and product distinction matter: the posted Cloud terms carry a May 2018 update date; that text cannot establish the terms of a later Tech Coalition software sublicense.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-recipients-receive\">What recipients receive</h2>\n<p>Microsoft describes PhotoDNA as software that computes an image signature for comparison with other signatures; a reference database supplies previously identified material for matching. Its landing page reports a donation of the technology to NCMEC and free provision to qualified organizations and law-enforcement tool providers. These statements do not themselves convey an open-source licence or a recipient&#x27;s independent rights to every comparison database. [Microsoft PhotoDNA](http[local research file] substantive headings “How does PhotoDNA technology work?” and “Who uses PhotoDNA technology?”, retained derivative lines97–104.</p>\n<p>The FAQ distinguishes installed technology requiring integration from the hosted REST service. It describes Cloud applicants as trusted online providers/businesses hosting user content, approved individually following an unnamed third party&#x27;s evaluation; keys follow vetting. It directs law enforcement toward forensic-tool providers or the on-premise licensing process rather than this Cloud offering. The posted FAQ says Cloud handles images, while a separate PhotoDNA technique can handle video. It advertises a benign-image integration environment and says customer images are not stored. These are provider descriptions, not independently observed operating guarantees. [Microsoft FAQ](http[local research file] retained derivative lines87–116.</p>\n<p>The documentation landing places portal access, sample code and test transactions after onboarding and describes subscription-key REST calls comparing a supplied image or URL against a hash set. That establishes a described matching interface; it does not promise a raw reference-set download. The linked portal was not opened. [Documentation](http[local research file] retained derivative lines86–91.</p>\n<h2 id=\"cloud-control-clauses-with-their-date-preserved\">Cloud control clauses, with their date preserved</h2>\n<p>The live-posted terms, visibly updated <strong>May 2018</strong>, incorporate MOSA/Online Services Terms and give these specific terms precedence. Microsoft retains eligibility discretion, reverification and access suspension. Customers must supply accurate information, secure accounts and report account-security breaches. Use is restricted to preventing CSAM distribution and supporting related investigations. Customers authorize usage audits and customer-identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC; those reports do not replace customers&#x27; own legal reporting duties.</p>\n<p>The text specifies internal use, excludes managed-service provision, gives a 30-day subscription term, allows throttling, and describes limited free transactions or Content Moderator charges for high volume. It supplies neither support nor an SLA and contractually excludes Microsoft Azure Service status. That designation differs from the FAQ&#x27;s hosting statement that the service runs on Azure. The dated pricing references are not a verified September 2026 commercial offer. No refusal-review procedure was located in these seven sections; incorporated agreement versions remain unexamined. [Cloud terms](http[local research file] sections1–7, retained derivative lines86–115.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-documented-licensing-outcome\">A documented licensing outcome</h2>\n<p>Microsoft&#x27;s 19 March 2012 announcement says the “Netherlands Forensics Institute” (publisher&#x27;s wording) and New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs <strong>had licensed PhotoDNA source code</strong>. It separately describes NetClean and CETS integration routes and direct licensing for agencies able to integrate the code. This is a dated licensor account of named software access, not an executed agreement, current licence status, cash grant or proof of a particular enforcement action. [Microsoft announcement](http[local research file] reader lines14–18. Original GET returned403; the complete substantive public-reader extraction is retained instead.</p>\n<h2 id=\"tech-coalition-and-the-boundary-still-open\">Tech Coalition and the boundary still open</h2>\n<p>The parallel Tech Coalition lane owns its expanded sublicense announcement and application rules. None of the Microsoft pages read here identifies Tech Coalition as the unnamed Cloud vetter, supplies its master sublicense agreement, or establishes that the Cloud terms govern its software distribution. Keep these as separate instruments unless a contract cross-reference joins them. Likewise, Microsoft&#x27;s NCMEC technology-donation account is not a finding about who selects or corrects a particular reference entry; the root NCMEC lane examines those administrative rules separately.</p>\n<p>No named Microsoft rejection or revocation decision, current signed on-premise licence, or TC master licence was located in this finite pass. That is a search limitation, not proof of universal approval or absence of restrictions. A current dated software licence/sublicence form and a public executed approval or reasoned refusal would discriminate between advertised availability and the precise approval, downstream-use, termination and reconsideration machinery. Likely custodians are Microsoft licensing and the relevant sublicensor; no contact was made.</p>\n<p>The local forest implication is that technical availability passes through separate approval and data-access decisions. A historical software grant supplies an actual access outcome; the posted Cloud terms supply express continuing control. Neither alone establishes authority over a recipient&#x27;s individual moderation decision or a working correction chain after an underlying reference changes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-reading-scope\">Source custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p><code>microsoft-captures.json</code> records URL, observation time, original/derived hashes, HTTP state and exact substantive reading scopes. Four original HTML responses were retained and hash-checked: home, FAQ, Cloud terms and documentation. Their complete substantive bodies were read; navigation and footer material were not treated as evidence.</p>\n<p>The 2012 source has only <code>microsoft-licensees-2012.reader.json</code>: its SHA identifies the reader extraction, not original HTML. The ordinary403 route is closed. No incorporation-by-link terms were presumed read; no application, account, authenticated portal, endpoint transaction, media or reference hash set was accessed. Six recorded focused queries close this instrument-level pass. The court-text leads Rosales and Bebris were relayed to the root lane as secondary leads only and supply no findings in this packet.</p>",
        "path": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09/microsoft-licensing.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ms-cloud-terms",
          "w28-access-s-ms-faq",
          "w28-access-s-ms-photodna",
          "w28-access-s-ms-licensees2012"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed after six focused queries and the named primary pages below. This is an administrative-document review, not a service test or a complete licence audit.\n\nThe evidence supports conditional access through different instruments. It does not establish a public entitlement to PhotoDNA, a licence refusal against a named applicant, or permission to obtain every reference-hash collection. The dates and product distinction matter: the posted Cloud terms carry a May 2018 update date; that text cannot establish the terms of a later Tech Coalition software sublicense.\n\n## What recipients receive\n\nMicrosoft describes PhotoDNA as software that computes an image signature for comparison with other signatures; a reference database supplies previously identified material for matching. Its landing page reports a donation of the technology to NCMEC and free provision to qualified organizations and law-enforcement tool providers. These statements do not themselves convey an open-source licence or a recipient's independent rights to every comparison database. Microsoft PhotoDNA (see source references) substantive headings “How does PhotoDNA technology work?” and “Who uses PhotoDNA technology?”, retained derivative lines97–104.\n\nThe FAQ distinguishes installed technology requiring integration from the hosted REST service. It describes Cloud applicants as trusted online providers/businesses hosting user content, approved individually following an unnamed third party's evaluation; keys follow vetting. It directs law enforcement toward forensic-tool providers or the on-premise licensing process rather than this Cloud offering. The posted FAQ says Cloud handles images, while a separate PhotoDNA technique can handle video. It advertises a benign-image integration environment and says customer images are not stored. These are provider descriptions, not independently observed operating guarantees. Microsoft FAQ (see source references) retained derivative lines87–116.\n\nThe documentation landing places portal access, sample code and test transactions after onboarding and describes subscription-key REST calls comparing a supplied image or URL against a hash set. That establishes a described matching interface; it does not promise a raw reference-set download. The linked portal was not opened. Documentation (see source references) retained derivative lines86–91.\n\n## Cloud control clauses, with their date preserved\n\nThe live-posted terms, visibly updated **May 2018**, incorporate MOSA/Online Services Terms and give these specific terms precedence. Microsoft retains eligibility discretion, reverification and access suspension. Customers must supply accurate information, secure accounts and report account-security breaches. Use is restricted to preventing CSAM distribution and supporting related investigations. Customers authorize usage audits and customer-identified aggregate match-count reports to NCMEC; those reports do not replace customers' own legal reporting duties.\n\nThe text specifies internal use, excludes managed-service provision, gives a 30-day subscription term, allows throttling, and describes limited free transactions or Content Moderator charges for high volume. It supplies neither support nor an SLA and contractually excludes Microsoft Azure Service status. That designation differs from the FAQ's hosting statement that the service runs on Azure. The dated pricing references are not a verified September 2026 commercial offer. No refusal-review procedure was located in these seven sections; incorporated agreement versions remain unexamined. Cloud terms (see source references) sections1–7, retained derivative lines86–115.\n\n## A documented licensing outcome\n\nMicrosoft's 19 March 2012 announcement says the “Netherlands Forensics Institute” (publisher's wording) and New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs **had licensed PhotoDNA source code**. It separately describes NetClean and CETS integration routes and direct licensing for agencies able to integrate the code. This is a dated licensor account of named software access, not an executed agreement, current licence status, cash grant or proof of a particular enforcement action. Microsoft announcement (see source references) reader lines14–18. Original GET returned403; the complete substantive public-reader extraction is retained instead.\n\n## Tech Coalition and the boundary still open\n\nThe parallel Tech Coalition lane owns its expanded sublicense announcement and application rules. None of the Microsoft pages read here identifies Tech Coalition as the unnamed Cloud vetter, supplies its master sublicense agreement, or establishes that the Cloud terms govern its software distribution. Keep these as separate instruments unless a contract cross-reference joins them. Likewise, Microsoft's NCMEC technology-donation account is not a finding about who selects or corrects a particular reference entry; the root NCMEC lane examines those administrative rules separately.\n\nNo named Microsoft rejection or revocation decision, current signed on-premise licence, or TC master licence was located in this finite pass. That is a search limitation, not proof of universal approval or absence of restrictions. A current dated software licence/sublicence form and a public executed approval or reasoned refusal would discriminate between advertised availability and the precise approval, downstream-use, termination and reconsideration machinery. Likely custodians are Microsoft licensing and the relevant sublicensor; no contact was made.\n\nThe local forest implication is that technical availability passes through separate approval and data-access decisions. A historical software grant supplies an actual access outcome; the posted Cloud terms supply express continuing control. Neither alone establishes authority over a recipient's individual moderation decision or a working correction chain after an underlying reference changes.\n\n## Source custody and reading scope\n\n`microsoft-captures.json` records URL, observation time, original/derived hashes, HTTP state and exact substantive reading scopes. Four original HTML responses were retained and hash-checked: home, FAQ, Cloud terms and documentation. Their complete substantive bodies were read; navigation and footer material were not treated as evidence.\n\nThe 2012 source has only `microsoft-licensees-2012.reader.json`: its SHA identifies the reader extraction, not original HTML. The ordinary403 route is closed. No incorporation-by-link terms were presumed read; no application, account, authenticated portal, endpoint transaction, media or reference hash set was accessed. Six recorded focused queries close this instrument-level pass. The court-text leads Rosales and Bebris were relayed to the root lane as secondary leads only and supply no findings in this packet.\n",
        "file": "research/photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-microsoft-licensing.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access",
        "title": "Reference hashes: permissions, retraction and an actual audit response",
        "description": "9September2026. Root acquisition closed. Public administrative documentation separates NCMEC's access administration, submitting members' rights, clients' local datasets and platform actions. No live hash/media data, credentials, endpoint, application or account was used.",
        "html": "<p>9September2026. Root acquisition closed. Public administrative documentation separates NCMEC&#x27;s access administration, submitting members&#x27; rights, clients&#x27; local datasets and platform actions. No live hash/media data, credentials, endpoint, application or account was used.</p>\n<h2 id=\"software-rights-do-not-supply-reference-data-rights\">Software rights do not supply reference-data rights</h2>\n<p>The [NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 documentation](http[local research file] visibly last updated5November2025, requires NCMEC-issued credentials and separate read-only/read-write permissions in each environment. Its table distinguishes industry, nonprofit and law-enforcement services, with separate CSAM/exploitative and generative-AI entries; a label is not a legal finding about every entry. Submitting members can limit which other members see their entries. No explicit grants means access for all members; deleting the last grant restores that default. Self-only access is separately described. These are documented functions, not an observed denial or a public dataset.</p>\n<p>Only the submitting member can retract its entries through the described API. Recipients&#x27; queries can return a deletion marker identifying submitter, entry and timestamp. Other members can provide affirmative/negative fingerprint feedback; example reason IDs are expressly synthetic. This is not an adjudicated appeal or a promise to remove an account restriction. Read scopes: sections2,4.6,7.5,7.9,7.10 completely; other sections were discovery/search context only. No operational examples were executed.</p>\n<p>The [Usage Recommendations](http[local research file] make the client side consequential. Clients maintain their own datasets and choose polling frequency; the API supplies the latest state using update times, rather than a historical event log. Owners can withdraw visibility, and the guide expressly says the API has no explicit mechanism for detecting others&#x27; visibility changes. New grants can require historical backfill. This differs from a published retraction marker: loss of access is not automatically evidence an entry was judged wrong. The guide does not establish a particular client&#x27;s cache deletion, duty to erase, or reversal of past moderation. Full substantive page read; date matches the main document footer.</p>\n<h2 id=\"review-and-removal-a-specific-public-record\">Review and removal: a specific public record</h2>\n<p>NCMEC&#x27;s [2025 CyberTipline data page](http[local research file] Hash Sharing and Removing Content, describes repeated staff review and reports12.1million-plus hashes shared with78 voluntary ESP participants as of31December2025. Its notice programme distinguishes CSAM, exploitative imagery of identified victims that may fall below the CSAM threshold, and predatory text. These notification categories must not all become criminal-content findings or be assigned to every reference environment. Removal/blocking is described as based on company terms. Counts and response times are NCMEC&#x27;s reported outcomes; no individual notification or client log was acquired. Root read those sections and adjacent response context, not the entire page or downloadable outcome tables.</p>\n<p>The [12April2024 Concentrix attestation](http[local research file] all3pages read, identifies an April2023 RFP and13July2023 audit contract. It covers538,922 unique files, with two reviews each against the stated federal definition, conducted16October–8December2023. It reports59 exceptions:50 judged not to meet that definition;5 cartoons/anime also not meeting it;2 unplayable videos;2 with uncertain depicted age. These are the auditor&#x27;s classifications, not our inspection of content or59 identical kinds of error.</p>\n<p>Page3 says Concentrix notified NCMEC and was told that NCMEC removed all59 in less than five business days. This is a concrete auditor-reported correction notification, not an independently observed deletion log or proof of recipient-wide correction. Reported99.99% agreement concerns that reviewed list/version; it is not all NCMEC environments or future datasets. The entire audit contract, workpapers and downstream acknowledgements remain unacquired.</p>\n<p>NCMEC&#x27;s [15April2024 announcement](http[local research file] full substantive body read, says the audit was donated, valued at$300,000. This is a reported in-kind contribution and recipient valuation, not a cash payment. The announcement also describes systems/training supplied by NCMEC and the auditor&#x27;s independent content decisions; its own promotional conclusion is not additional independent assurance. No new corporate genealogy or moderator/subject identification was undertaken.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-named-agreement-trail-through-reproduced-judicial-text\">A named agreement trail, through reproduced judicial text</h2>\n<p>A [25November2025 Rosales opinion reproduced by FindLaw](http[local research file] cases01-23-00876-CR/00877-CR, describes separate Microsoft→NCMEC→Dropbox software sublicensing, database-access agreements and a signatures MOU. The reproduced text says the MOU grants restricted royalty-free access and an agreement to attempt detection; database clauses retain voluntary access and disclaim NCMEC direction over use and responsibility for other nonprofits&#x27; entries. The court rejected government-agency attribution on that record, while assuming NCMEC&#x27;s status for argument. It also records that actual use of that software in the contested search was not proved. This is not a universal judgment that collaborations cannot exercise influence.</p>\n<p>Custody matters: root read the reproduced analysis123–196, relevant footnotes and conclusion through the reader. It is not the official original, full contracts, or current Dropbox terms. The available official link was for a distinct July2025 opinion; reader failure followed by one GET403 closed that route. FindLaw GET likewise returned an error while its reader worked. No original or signed agreement is claimed. A later attempt to retain serialized reader output hit Windows command-length limits before creating a file; tool history/read locators, rather than a fabricated original, preserve this scope. No further recovery route was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"synthesis-and-exact-remaining-gap\">Synthesis and exact remaining gap</h2>\n<p>There are several administrators, not just one database owner: NCMEC grants environment access; a submitter controls the visibility/retraction of its entries; a recipient chooses its local subset, polling and effects. Review can produce a documented correction, yet feed withdrawal and a restored item remain different steps. The reproduced litigation shows why signed access rights, general detection commitments and case-specific direction need separate evidence. Main licence/TC sublicence findings are in the sibling lanes and are not inferred here.</p>\n<p>ncmec-captures.json records five successful primary originals, the FindLaw error response and the closed official-opinion access observation. HTML derivatives/section extracts and PDF text are labelled. Root checked disk hashes after capture and after final scope edits. Source-provided examples are not real entries. Four focused NCMEC discovery queries and three court-identity queries were used; unhelpful same-name cases were discarded. No data endpoint, status check, application, private system, outreach or paid source was accessed. Acquisition is stopped for combined review and forest; the case and ZIP remain unchanged.</p>",
        "path": "photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09/ncmec-access.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-api",
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-usage",
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-audit",
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-donation",
          "w28-access-s-ncmec-provider"
        ],
        "markdown": "9September2026. Root acquisition closed. Public administrative documentation separates NCMEC's access administration, submitting members' rights, clients' local datasets and platform actions. No live hash/media data, credentials, endpoint, application or account was used.\n\n## Software rights do not supply reference-data rights\n\nThe NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 documentation (see source references) visibly last updated5November2025, requires NCMEC-issued credentials and separate read-only/read-write permissions in each environment. Its table distinguishes industry, nonprofit and law-enforcement services, with separate CSAM/exploitative and generative-AI entries; a label is not a legal finding about every entry. Submitting members can limit which other members see their entries. No explicit grants means access for all members; deleting the last grant restores that default. Self-only access is separately described. These are documented functions, not an observed denial or a public dataset.\n\nOnly the submitting member can retract its entries through the described API. Recipients' queries can return a deletion marker identifying submitter, entry and timestamp. Other members can provide affirmative/negative fingerprint feedback; example reason IDs are expressly synthetic. This is not an adjudicated appeal or a promise to remove an account restriction. Read scopes: sections2,4.6,7.5,7.9,7.10 completely; other sections were discovery/search context only. No operational examples were executed.\n\nThe Usage Recommendations (see source references) make the client side consequential. Clients maintain their own datasets and choose polling frequency; the API supplies the latest state using update times, rather than a historical event log. Owners can withdraw visibility, and the guide expressly says the API has no explicit mechanism for detecting others' visibility changes. New grants can require historical backfill. This differs from a published retraction marker: loss of access is not automatically evidence an entry was judged wrong. The guide does not establish a particular client's cache deletion, duty to erase, or reversal of past moderation. Full substantive page read; date matches the main document footer.\n\n## Review and removal: a specific public record\n\nNCMEC's 2025 CyberTipline data page (see source references) Hash Sharing and Removing Content, describes repeated staff review and reports12.1million-plus hashes shared with78 voluntary ESP participants as of31December2025. Its notice programme distinguishes CSAM, exploitative imagery of identified victims that may fall below the CSAM threshold, and predatory text. These notification categories must not all become criminal-content findings or be assigned to every reference environment. Removal/blocking is described as based on company terms. Counts and response times are NCMEC's reported outcomes; no individual notification or client log was acquired. Root read those sections and adjacent response context, not the entire page or downloadable outcome tables.\n\nThe 12April2024 Concentrix attestation (see source references) all3pages read, identifies an April2023 RFP and13July2023 audit contract. It covers538,922 unique files, with two reviews each against the stated federal definition, conducted16October–8December2023. It reports59 exceptions:50 judged not to meet that definition;5 cartoons/anime also not meeting it;2 unplayable videos;2 with uncertain depicted age. These are the auditor's classifications, not our inspection of content or59 identical kinds of error.\n\nPage3 says Concentrix notified NCMEC and was told that NCMEC removed all59 in less than five business days. This is a concrete auditor-reported correction notification, not an independently observed deletion log or proof of recipient-wide correction. Reported99.99% agreement concerns that reviewed list/version; it is not all NCMEC environments or future datasets. The entire audit contract, workpapers and downstream acknowledgements remain unacquired.\n\nNCMEC's 15April2024 announcement (see source references) full substantive body read, says the audit was donated, valued at$300,000. This is a reported in-kind contribution and recipient valuation, not a cash payment. The announcement also describes systems/training supplied by NCMEC and the auditor's independent content decisions; its own promotional conclusion is not additional independent assurance. No new corporate genealogy or moderator/subject identification was undertaken.\n\n## A named agreement trail, through reproduced judicial text\n\nA 25November2025 Rosales opinion reproduced by FindLaw (see source references) cases01-23-00876-CR/00877-CR, describes separate Microsoft→NCMEC→Dropbox software sublicensing, database-access agreements and a signatures MOU. The reproduced text says the MOU grants restricted royalty-free access and an agreement to attempt detection; database clauses retain voluntary access and disclaim NCMEC direction over use and responsibility for other nonprofits' entries. The court rejected government-agency attribution on that record, while assuming NCMEC's status for argument. It also records that actual use of that software in the contested search was not proved. This is not a universal judgment that collaborations cannot exercise influence.\n\nCustody matters: root read the reproduced analysis123–196, relevant footnotes and conclusion through the reader. It is not the official original, full contracts, or current Dropbox terms. The available official link was for a distinct July2025 opinion; reader failure followed by one GET403 closed that route. FindLaw GET likewise returned an error while its reader worked. No original or signed agreement is claimed. A later attempt to retain serialized reader output hit Windows command-length limits before creating a file; tool history/read locators, rather than a fabricated original, preserve this scope. No further recovery route was opened.\n\n## Synthesis and exact remaining gap\n\nThere are several administrators, not just one database owner: NCMEC grants environment access; a submitter controls the visibility/retraction of its entries; a recipient chooses its local subset, polling and effects. Review can produce a documented correction, yet feed withdrawal and a restored item remain different steps. The reproduced litigation shows why signed access rights, general detection commitments and case-specific direction need separate evidence. Main licence/TC sublicence findings are in the sibling lanes and are not inferred here.\n\nncmec-captures.json records five successful primary originals, the FindLaw error response and the closed official-opinion access observation. HTML derivatives/section extracts and PDF text are labelled. Root checked disk hashes after capture and after final scope edits. Source-provided examples are not real entries. Four focused NCMEC discovery queries and three court-identity queries were used; unhelpful same-name cases were discarded. No data endpoint, status check, application, private system, outreach or paid source was accessed. Acquisition is stopped for combined review and forest; the case and ZIP remain unchanged.\n",
        "file": "research/photodna-access-wave-2026-09-09-ncmec-access.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design",
        "title": "PIPCU funding design: reported annual signing, unacquired pilot conditions",
        "description": "Closed 9 September 2026 after the authorised public-source pass. This packet adds an author-attributed report of a 2026–27 Service Agreement signing and a meeting involving the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. It does not acquire the agreement, a pilot specification, an industry contribution or a private right to select police work.",
        "html": "<p>Closed 9 September 2026 after the authorised public-source pass. This packet adds an author-attributed report of a 2026–27 Service Agreement signing and a meeting involving the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. It does not acquire the agreement, a pilot specification, an industry contribution or a private right to select police work.</p>\n<p>The three periods remain separate: the government announced public baseline funding for April 2026–March 2029; a later public LinkedIn post reports signing the first annual Service Agreement for 2026–27; the industry co-funding pilot remains planned from April 2027. The annual document must not be relabelled as an acquired three-year contract or a signed industry-funding agreement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-public-records-establish\">What the public records establish</h2>\n<p>The retained [IPO/DSIT announcement of 9 March 2026](http[local research file] opening paragraph and Background 3–4, specifies approximately £3 million per year of baseline funding, provided by DSIT via the IPO, through March 2029. Its pilot paragraph describes testing additional enforcement activity with partnership funding. The paragraph immediately after Adam Williams&#x27;s quotation assigns development of the pilot&#x27;s priorities and contribution level to the IPO and PIPCU together. It anticipates stakeholder engagement; it gives neither contributor admission criteria nor a method for accepting or rejecting contributions. The Commissioner describes public-sector enforcement powers and strategic oversight alongside industry expertise and intelligence. That is a public account of roles, not an acquired independence or conflicts clause.</p>\n<p>[Parliamentary answer 119446](http[local research file] asked 10 March and answered by Ian Murray for DCMS on 19 March 2026, confirms funding through 2029 in an answer about illegal streaming and broadcaster sustainability. The complete question and answer were read; the decisive funding passage is the second answer paragraph (reader lines 17–18). This corroborates the announced duration without supplying an assurance schedule, payment condition or pilot rule. No actual police receipt is established by either announcement.</p>\n<p>The new [public post displayed as IPO Counter-Infringement](http[local research file] says its enforcement team and CEO Adam Williams met to sign the 2026–27 Service Agreement and met representatives of the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. Its embedded post, displayed as <strong>Intellectual Property Office UK</strong>, says the annual agreement was signed as the first step after the three-year commitment. It names Daniel Guthrie, Director General of the Alliance, and Matthew Hibbert, Director of Anti-Piracy at Sky, among attendees. This establishes an attributed report of an actual meeting, a narrower advance beyond the March intention to engage. Neither body says that Sky or the Alliance paid, committed a contribution, approved a priority, obtained a seat, or signed the agreement.</p>\n<p>The main post&#x27;s retained JSON-LD gives <code>datePublished</code> as <strong>2026-05-29T15:21:33.883Z</strong>. The displayed date is <strong>3mo / Edited</strong>. The embedded body says the visit occurred that week; an exact meeting date, the embedded post&#x27;s publication date and the date of any edit are not independently established. Its image caption/alt text names Adam Williams and Pete O&#x27;Doherty as signing. That caption is readable source text, <strong>not our visual verification of signatures</strong>: the image pixels, signature page and agreement text were not acquired or inspected.</p>\n<p>Author identity also has a limit. Root&#x27;s separate check found that the official GOV.UK IPO landing links a LinkedIn profile at <code>/company/uk-ipo/</code>, whereas this retained page identifies its embedded author at <code>/company/intellectual-property-office-uk</code>. The gov-linked profile returned 999 when root tried it; that route is closed. The account alias has not been independently reconciled. Accordingly the signing and attendance findings are attributed to the displayed authors of the public posts, not presented as a separately verified GOV.UK publication. This is distinct from the directly attributable government funding announcement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-named-industrys-position-and-the-missing-decision-rights\">The named industry&#x27;s position and the missing decision rights</h2>\n<p>The March government announcement attributes to Dan Guthrie a welcome for continued public funding and an intention to engage with IPO/PIPCU about expanding the unit&#x27;s work. The [Alliance&#x27;s own About page](http[local research file] first two substantive paragraphs and Staff and board section, describes a UK coalition and identifies Dan Guthrie as Director General. This supports counterpart identification; it supplies no corporate contracting identity, pilot mandate or authority to commit every member.</p>\n<p>The retained signing-page HTML also includes a <strong>separate related-post card displayed as Alliance for Intellectual Property</strong> welcoming the security of three years&#x27; funding. Its exact link is [the Alliance&#x27;s related post](http[local research file] That text was read within the retained page; this separate URL was not fetched. It confirms the displayed counterpart&#x27;s supportive public position at that scope. It does not promise to co-fund.</p>\n<p>The Alliance&#x27;s [Consumer Protection page](http[local research file] links PIPCU but publishes no pilot conditions. Its [Online Accountability page](http[local research file] including the Know Your Business Customer section, advocates verification protocols by hosting providers, online advertising companies, proxies, payment gateways and marketplaces, with loss of business-critical hosting/payment access as a consequence for illicit activity. This is a business-customer verification demand, not a consumer age-identification requirement. This is a policy position of a named participant in the reported meeting. <strong>No inspected record connects that position to an adopted PIPCU pilot priority or policing condition.</strong> The page&#x27;s precise publication/update date is unknown; its copyright year is not treated as that date. No linked policy genealogy was followed.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Decision or resource boundary</th>\n<th>Best public evidence in this packet</th>\n<th>Unacquired discriminator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Baseline and additional capacity</td>\n<td>March announcement separates the public baseline from proposed additional pilot work.</td>\n<td>Executed 2026–27 agreement, financial schedules, baseline definition and any substitution restriction.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Who develops pilot priorities</td>\n<td>March announcement identifies IPO and PIPCU jointly.</td>\n<td>Priority-selection procedure, committee membership, approval rights and minutes.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Who may contribute, and how much</td>\n<td>General invitation to interested industry partners; contribution level under development.</td>\n<td>Eligibility/exclusion rules, contribution bands, recipient and acceptance instrument.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Industry access</td>\n<td>Public post reports Alliance and Sky attendance; displayed Alliance card welcomes funding.</td>\n<td>Agenda, minutes or consultation output establishing what was proposed and what was decided.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Conflict controls and operational independence</td>\n<td>Commissioner describes public strategic oversight; no current pilot clause acquired.</td>\n<td>Conflicts, recusal, earmarking, non-contributor access, reporting, audit, withdrawal and repayment provisions.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2 id=\"reusable-relations-and-strongest-rival\">Reusable relations and strongest rival</h2>\n<p>The defensible additions are <strong>government confirmation of baseline duration</strong>, <strong>displayed-author report of annual agreement signing</strong>, <strong>reported meeting participation by Alliance and Sky</strong>, and <strong>attributed Alliance support for public funding</strong>. Their stages are respectively an official public commitment, reported execution, reported engagement, and a public position. There is no supported contribution-to-priority entitlement edge.</p>\n<p>A capacity-expansion explanation remains strongest: public funding continues, public bodies develop a supplementary pilot, and industry contributes expertise and discussion. A competing explanation is that future earmarked resources could shape the queue or preferred sectors without formally transferring police powers. The meeting record makes that mechanism more concrete as a question, but it does not resolve it. The most discriminating records are the annual agreement and a published pilot participation/priority protocol, followed by records showing the disposition of industry proposals. None was acquired in this pass.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-reading-scope-and-finite-frontier\">Custody, reading scope and finite frontier</h2>\n<p><code>funding-design-captures.json</code> records five newly retained original HTML files, one Parliamentary error response, read scopes and three reused original hashes. <code>funding-design-post-scoped.json</code> preserves the main post, embedded IPO text, relevant related cards, precise observed links, metadata and image-caption scope. <code>funding-design-parliament-reader-note.json</code> is a scoped reading note, <strong>not an original Parliamentary document</strong>. The successful public web reader supplied the substantive answer; the ordinary preservation GET returned 403 and was not repeated. The LinkedIn reader returned Cache miss; its one ordinary GET substitute succeeded. No login, account, form, image fetch or operational interaction was used.</p>\n<p>The full original Alliance news index was read. Its first entry is <strong>30 June 2026</strong>, an AI-licensing event, whereas the web-reader rendition began at July 2025. The ordinary original supersedes the earlier index-date observation. Neither version supplies pilot conditions; that is only an observation about the inspected index, not proof that engagement did not occur. The successful signing post is positive evidence that engagement was reported elsewhere.</p>\n<p><code>funding-design-search-routes.json</code> records the exact queries and inspected public navigation routes across government, Parliament, police/governance and Alliance surfaces. These yielded no executed agreement, assurance schedule, pilot specification, contributor list, contribution table or conflict protocol. Search absence does not establish nonexistence, concealment or a lack of safeguards. The prior non-public police budget appendix and all closed routes remain untouched. Prior accounts record an IPO-to-DSIT cost-covering dividend; that remains distinct from the new baseline commitment, a police receipt, or future industry money.</p>\n<p>Acquisition is closed at this instrument/engagement boundary for root review and a forest assessment. No case, atlas, ZIP, current-work or forest file was changed.</p>",
        "path": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09/funding-design.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-signing-post2026",
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-about",
          "w29-enf-s-alliance-online",
          "w29-enf-s-funding-answer2026"
        ],
        "markdown": "Closed 9 September 2026 after the authorised public-source pass. This packet adds an author-attributed report of a 2026–27 Service Agreement signing and a meeting involving the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. It does not acquire the agreement, a pilot specification, an industry contribution or a private right to select police work.\n\nThe three periods remain separate: the government announced public baseline funding for April 2026–March 2029; a later public LinkedIn post reports signing the first annual Service Agreement for 2026–27; the industry co-funding pilot remains planned from April 2027. The annual document must not be relabelled as an acquired three-year contract or a signed industry-funding agreement.\n\n## What the public records establish\n\nThe retained IPO/DSIT announcement of 9 March 2026 (see source references) opening paragraph and Background 3–4, specifies approximately £3 million per year of baseline funding, provided by DSIT via the IPO, through March 2029. Its pilot paragraph describes testing additional enforcement activity with partnership funding. The paragraph immediately after Adam Williams's quotation assigns development of the pilot's priorities and contribution level to the IPO and PIPCU together. It anticipates stakeholder engagement; it gives neither contributor admission criteria nor a method for accepting or rejecting contributions. The Commissioner describes public-sector enforcement powers and strategic oversight alongside industry expertise and intelligence. That is a public account of roles, not an acquired independence or conflicts clause.\n\nParliamentary answer 119446 (see source references) asked 10 March and answered by Ian Murray for DCMS on 19 March 2026, confirms funding through 2029 in an answer about illegal streaming and broadcaster sustainability. The complete question and answer were read; the decisive funding passage is the second answer paragraph (reader lines 17–18). This corroborates the announced duration without supplying an assurance schedule, payment condition or pilot rule. No actual police receipt is established by either announcement.\n\nThe new public post displayed as IPO Counter-Infringement (see source references) says its enforcement team and CEO Adam Williams met to sign the 2026–27 Service Agreement and met representatives of the Alliance for Intellectual Property and Sky. Its embedded post, displayed as **Intellectual Property Office UK**, says the annual agreement was signed as the first step after the three-year commitment. It names Daniel Guthrie, Director General of the Alliance, and Matthew Hibbert, Director of Anti-Piracy at Sky, among attendees. This establishes an attributed report of an actual meeting, a narrower advance beyond the March intention to engage. Neither body says that Sky or the Alliance paid, committed a contribution, approved a priority, obtained a seat, or signed the agreement.\n\nThe main post's retained JSON-LD gives `datePublished` as **2026-05-29T15:21:33.883Z**. The displayed date is **3mo / Edited**. The embedded body says the visit occurred that week; an exact meeting date, the embedded post's publication date and the date of any edit are not independently established. Its image caption/alt text names Adam Williams and Pete O'Doherty as signing. That caption is readable source text, **not our visual verification of signatures**: the image pixels, signature page and agreement text were not acquired or inspected.\n\nAuthor identity also has a limit. Root's separate check found that the official GOV.UK IPO landing links a LinkedIn profile at `/company/uk-ipo/`, whereas this retained page identifies its embedded author at `/company/intellectual-property-office-uk`. The gov-linked profile returned 999 when root tried it; that route is closed. The account alias has not been independently reconciled. Accordingly the signing and attendance findings are attributed to the displayed authors of the public posts, not presented as a separately verified GOV.UK publication. This is distinct from the directly attributable government funding announcement.\n\n## The named industry's position and the missing decision rights\n\nThe March government announcement attributes to Dan Guthrie a welcome for continued public funding and an intention to engage with IPO/PIPCU about expanding the unit's work. The Alliance's own About page (see source references) first two substantive paragraphs and Staff and board section, describes a UK coalition and identifies Dan Guthrie as Director General. This supports counterpart identification; it supplies no corporate contracting identity, pilot mandate or authority to commit every member.\n\nThe retained signing-page HTML also includes a **separate related-post card displayed as Alliance for Intellectual Property** welcoming the security of three years' funding. Its exact link is the Alliance's related post (see source references) That text was read within the retained page; this separate URL was not fetched. It confirms the displayed counterpart's supportive public position at that scope. It does not promise to co-fund.\n\nThe Alliance's Consumer Protection page (see source references) links PIPCU but publishes no pilot conditions. Its Online Accountability page (see source references) including the Know Your Business Customer section, advocates verification protocols by hosting providers, online advertising companies, proxies, payment gateways and marketplaces, with loss of business-critical hosting/payment access as a consequence for illicit activity. This is a business-customer verification demand, not a consumer age-identification requirement. This is a policy position of a named participant in the reported meeting. **No inspected record connects that position to an adopted PIPCU pilot priority or policing condition.** The page's precise publication/update date is unknown; its copyright year is not treated as that date. No linked policy genealogy was followed.\n\n| Decision or resource boundary | Best public evidence in this packet | Unacquired discriminator |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Baseline and additional capacity | March announcement separates the public baseline from proposed additional pilot work. | Executed 2026–27 agreement, financial schedules, baseline definition and any substitution restriction. |\n| Who develops pilot priorities | March announcement identifies IPO and PIPCU jointly. | Priority-selection procedure, committee membership, approval rights and minutes. |\n| Who may contribute, and how much | General invitation to interested industry partners; contribution level under development. | Eligibility/exclusion rules, contribution bands, recipient and acceptance instrument. |\n| Industry access | Public post reports Alliance and Sky attendance; displayed Alliance card welcomes funding. | Agenda, minutes or consultation output establishing what was proposed and what was decided. |\n| Conflict controls and operational independence | Commissioner describes public strategic oversight; no current pilot clause acquired. | Conflicts, recusal, earmarking, non-contributor access, reporting, audit, withdrawal and repayment provisions. |\n\n## Reusable relations and strongest rival\n\nThe defensible additions are **government confirmation of baseline duration**, **displayed-author report of annual agreement signing**, **reported meeting participation by Alliance and Sky**, and **attributed Alliance support for public funding**. Their stages are respectively an official public commitment, reported execution, reported engagement, and a public position. There is no supported contribution-to-priority entitlement edge.\n\nA capacity-expansion explanation remains strongest: public funding continues, public bodies develop a supplementary pilot, and industry contributes expertise and discussion. A competing explanation is that future earmarked resources could shape the queue or preferred sectors without formally transferring police powers. The meeting record makes that mechanism more concrete as a question, but it does not resolve it. The most discriminating records are the annual agreement and a published pilot participation/priority protocol, followed by records showing the disposition of industry proposals. None was acquired in this pass.\n\n## Custody, reading scope and finite frontier\n\n`funding-design-captures.json` records five newly retained original HTML files, one Parliamentary error response, read scopes and three reused original hashes. `funding-design-post-scoped.json` preserves the main post, embedded IPO text, relevant related cards, precise observed links, metadata and image-caption scope. `funding-design-parliament-reader-note.json` is a scoped reading note, **not an original Parliamentary document**. The successful public web reader supplied the substantive answer; the ordinary preservation GET returned 403 and was not repeated. The LinkedIn reader returned Cache miss; its one ordinary GET substitute succeeded. No login, account, form, image fetch or operational interaction was used.\n\nThe full original Alliance news index was read. Its first entry is **30 June 2026**, an AI-licensing event, whereas the web-reader rendition began at July 2025. The ordinary original supersedes the earlier index-date observation. Neither version supplies pilot conditions; that is only an observation about the inspected index, not proof that engagement did not occur. The successful signing post is positive evidence that engagement was reported elsewhere.\n\n`funding-design-search-routes.json` records the exact queries and inspected public navigation routes across government, Parliament, police/governance and Alliance surfaces. These yielded no executed agreement, assurance schedule, pilot specification, contributor list, contribution table or conflict protocol. Search absence does not establish nonexistence, concealment or a lack of safeguards. The prior non-public police budget appendix and all closed routes remain untouched. Prior accounts record an IPO-to-DSIT cost-covering dividend; that remains distinct from the new baseline commitment, a police receipt, or future industry money.\n\nAcquisition is closed at this instrument/engagement boundary for root review and a forest assessment. No case, atlas, ZIP, current-work or forest file was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-funding-design.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules",
        "title": "PIPCU and IPO priority rules: an actual historical industry role, incomplete current continuity",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. One new police-guide official-reader record and one new government annual-report original, compared with the accepted August2025 Gateway announcement and posted2020 Ashiko policy. No referral form, account, contact, operational endpoint, non-public appendix or visible UI was accessed.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. One new police-guide official-reader record and one new government annual-report original, compared with the accepted August2025 Gateway announcement and posted2020 Ashiko policy. No referral form, account, contact, operational endpoint, non-public appendix or visible UI was accessed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-concrete-new-finding\">The concrete new finding</h2>\n<p>The posted [PIPCU Referral Guide](http[local research file] PDF4, says a Steering Group comprising IPO, City of London Police, rights holders and industry bodies agreed broad priorities: physical goods with an online connection and digital content. This is an explicit shared priority-setting role, not just consultation attendance.</p>\n<p>PDF5 lists six acceptance considerations: remit; organised activity; potential public-safety danger and the extent of actual or anticipated financial loss or reputational harm to the rights holder/referrer; continuing offending; realistic asset recovery; and prospects of identifying suspects and prosecuting successfully. Historical offending is exceptional. It excludes certain product categories and normally requires the original agency to refer previously investigated matters.</p>\n<p>PDF6–8 expect investigative groundwork, original evidence and explained inferences from referrers. PDF9 describes DI refusal letters giving reasons, alternatives and a ten-working-day decision aim, with contact if complexity/information needs prevent it. Accepted referrers must support evidential proceedings. PDF10 permits proportionate focus/disruption, CPS cooperation and preservation of relevant material.</p>\n<p>The guide is undated in the inspected text. PDF2 mentions October2014 funding; it describes an old referral form. The search engine&#x27;s age estimate is not a publication date. These are historical posted rules, not established current Gateway procedure.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-later-evidence-does-and-does-not-establish\">What the later evidence does and does not establish</h2>\n<p>The accepted [12 August2025 announcement](http[local research file] expressly replaced the PIPCU form from 11August. Initial assessment and prioritisation now sit with IPO&#x27;s Gateway team, which may develop intelligence or refer onward. It supplies no weighted scoring scheme, commitment to the old ten-day target, industry vote, complaint escalation or adoption of the guide&#x27;s exact criteria. The police guide&#x27;s case-acceptance provisions also should not be imposed on every Ashiko bulk suspension: the separately posted2020 policy supplies its own DCI suspension-authorization rule.</p>\n<p>A later official implementation account is available in the [IPO annual report for 2022/23](http[local research file] Counter infringement, reader427–441. It describes reformed IPCG structures as existing: a mixed enforcement/industry delivery group, an industry advisory committee, and an executive board of senior industry/enforcement decisionmakers. The report links these arrangements to tactical cooperation and strategic coordination. This advances beyond the earlier strategy&#x27;s promise to build coordination, but is the institution&#x27;s report of implementation, not an acquired constitution, minutes or observed case decision.</p>\n<p>The same section says an internal Strategic Threat Assessment was completed in November2022 while a public version was being developed; an external monitoring/evaluation commission aimed for May2023. Neither the assessment nor the evaluation output was acquired here. The report period is 1April2022–31March2023, with publication identified as July2023; the inspected HTML says updated9January2025. Its present-tense descriptions are not September2026 currency guarantees.</p>\n<p>The IPCG executive board, PIPCU Steering Group and IPO Gateway are <strong>not identified as one body</strong>. No acquired instrument assigns the IPCG industry representatives authority to score individual Gateway referrals or sign police suspension requests. Nor is an industry participant&#x27;s police-database access implied. Root separately owns the already-retained2022 strategy and FY2025/26 enforcement-capability comparison; their promises and reported implementation remain source-specific.</p>\n<h2 id=\"accountability-and-competing-interpretations\">Accountability and competing interpretations</h2>\n<p>Industry participation in choosing a broad remit and a harm factor explicitly including referrer interests are substantive agenda-setting mechanisms. The guide also expects evidence, police explanations, proportionate action and prosecution-service involvement. Those are concrete counterweights on paper, not independent proof of each decision&#x27;s quality. Neither industry command nor complete immunity from industry influence follows.</p>\n<p>The acquired public texts do not provide a current Gateway conflict/recusal protocol, weights, escalation rights, performance assessment or an executed allocation of authority between these bodies. The historical guide does not state committee quorum, voting shares or recusal rules. This bounded failure to locate them is not proof they do not exist, were withheld, or were ignored. No general policing or corporate governance rule was substituted for a Gateway-specific instrument.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the <strong>current Gateway assessment/priority SOP and reasoned allocation or refusal template</strong>, and the <strong>PIPCU Steering Group/IPCG terms of reference, continuity decision and conflict register or recusal provision</strong>. Likely holders are IPO Intelligence and Law Enforcement and City of London Police/PIPCU. A redacted tasking decision could distinguish industry-informed harm criteria from preferential attention to contributors. No approach to those holders is authorized or attempted here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-finite-scope\">Custody and finite scope</h2>\n<p>The new guide was read in the official reader at cover/PDF1; introduction/history/PDF2–3; broad priorities/PDF4; all six acceptance factors/PDF5; referral evidential instructions/PDF6–8; response/accountability/PDF9; resource/proportionality/preservation provisions/PDF10; and feedback statement/PDF12. Academy promotional material/PDF11 is excluded. This is not an executed agreement or a facsimile read. One ordinary public GET returned403; the response bytes are retained as an error, never the guide&#x27;s original. The successful reader is retained in priority-referral-guide.reader.txt. That route is closed, with no variant or retry.</p>\n<p>The annual-report ordinary GET succeeded. Retained priority-ipo2023.html SHA256 is <code>b7f1c94f0df2269776c32aeff112d2f7af7a3ee9da51c1f2046164b40486ab16</code>. I read its complete Counter infringement section and period/publication/update blocks directly from the original. International visits and unrelated operations appearing in that section are not new findings. No whole annual-report read is claimed. The original, scoped extraction and scoped official-reader capture are distinct in priority-captures.json.</p>\n<p>The August2025 original and2020 police-reader passages were reused locally from the accepted resources wave, not reacquired. Ten focused discovery queries covered exact Gateway/criteria, PIPCU priorities/conflicts/tasking and the exact Steering Group name, followed by the one permitted implementation paragraph. Search results for other police units, Creative, generic prioritisation frameworks, other local-authority intelligence gateways, corporate schemes and the operational form were not opened as substitute criteria. A police search result describing a2025 medicines case is discovery only, not a new case finding or proof the old exclusions were formally revoked. No current guide-adoption or Gateway scoring instrument was located in this finite pass. No branch follows before the combined forest.</p>",
        "path": "pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09/priority-rules.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-referral-guide",
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-report2023"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. One new police-guide official-reader record and one new government annual-report original, compared with the accepted August2025 Gateway announcement and posted2020 Ashiko policy. No referral form, account, contact, operational endpoint, non-public appendix or visible UI was accessed.\n\n## The concrete new finding\n\nThe posted PIPCU Referral Guide (see source references) PDF4, says a Steering Group comprising IPO, City of London Police, rights holders and industry bodies agreed broad priorities: physical goods with an online connection and digital content. This is an explicit shared priority-setting role, not just consultation attendance.\n\nPDF5 lists six acceptance considerations: remit; organised activity; potential public-safety danger and the extent of actual or anticipated financial loss or reputational harm to the rights holder/referrer; continuing offending; realistic asset recovery; and prospects of identifying suspects and prosecuting successfully. Historical offending is exceptional. It excludes certain product categories and normally requires the original agency to refer previously investigated matters.\n\nPDF6–8 expect investigative groundwork, original evidence and explained inferences from referrers. PDF9 describes DI refusal letters giving reasons, alternatives and a ten-working-day decision aim, with contact if complexity/information needs prevent it. Accepted referrers must support evidential proceedings. PDF10 permits proportionate focus/disruption, CPS cooperation and preservation of relevant material.\n\nThe guide is undated in the inspected text. PDF2 mentions October2014 funding; it describes an old referral form. The search engine's age estimate is not a publication date. These are historical posted rules, not established current Gateway procedure.\n\n## What the later evidence does and does not establish\n\nThe accepted 12 August2025 announcement (see source references) expressly replaced the PIPCU form from 11August. Initial assessment and prioritisation now sit with IPO's Gateway team, which may develop intelligence or refer onward. It supplies no weighted scoring scheme, commitment to the old ten-day target, industry vote, complaint escalation or adoption of the guide's exact criteria. The police guide's case-acceptance provisions also should not be imposed on every Ashiko bulk suspension: the separately posted2020 policy supplies its own DCI suspension-authorization rule.\n\nA later official implementation account is available in the IPO annual report for 2022/23 (see source references) Counter infringement, reader427–441. It describes reformed IPCG structures as existing: a mixed enforcement/industry delivery group, an industry advisory committee, and an executive board of senior industry/enforcement decisionmakers. The report links these arrangements to tactical cooperation and strategic coordination. This advances beyond the earlier strategy's promise to build coordination, but is the institution's report of implementation, not an acquired constitution, minutes or observed case decision.\n\nThe same section says an internal Strategic Threat Assessment was completed in November2022 while a public version was being developed; an external monitoring/evaluation commission aimed for May2023. Neither the assessment nor the evaluation output was acquired here. The report period is 1April2022–31March2023, with publication identified as July2023; the inspected HTML says updated9January2025. Its present-tense descriptions are not September2026 currency guarantees.\n\nThe IPCG executive board, PIPCU Steering Group and IPO Gateway are **not identified as one body**. No acquired instrument assigns the IPCG industry representatives authority to score individual Gateway referrals or sign police suspension requests. Nor is an industry participant's police-database access implied. Root separately owns the already-retained2022 strategy and FY2025/26 enforcement-capability comparison; their promises and reported implementation remain source-specific.\n\n## Accountability and competing interpretations\n\nIndustry participation in choosing a broad remit and a harm factor explicitly including referrer interests are substantive agenda-setting mechanisms. The guide also expects evidence, police explanations, proportionate action and prosecution-service involvement. Those are concrete counterweights on paper, not independent proof of each decision's quality. Neither industry command nor complete immunity from industry influence follows.\n\nThe acquired public texts do not provide a current Gateway conflict/recusal protocol, weights, escalation rights, performance assessment or an executed allocation of authority between these bodies. The historical guide does not state committee quorum, voting shares or recusal rules. This bounded failure to locate them is not proof they do not exist, were withheld, or were ignored. No general policing or corporate governance rule was substituted for a Gateway-specific instrument.\n\nThe next discriminating records are the **current Gateway assessment/priority SOP and reasoned allocation or refusal template**, and the **PIPCU Steering Group/IPCG terms of reference, continuity decision and conflict register or recusal provision**. Likely holders are IPO Intelligence and Law Enforcement and City of London Police/PIPCU. A redacted tasking decision could distinguish industry-informed harm criteria from preferential attention to contributors. No approach to those holders is authorized or attempted here.\n\n## Custody and finite scope\n\nThe new guide was read in the official reader at cover/PDF1; introduction/history/PDF2–3; broad priorities/PDF4; all six acceptance factors/PDF5; referral evidential instructions/PDF6–8; response/accountability/PDF9; resource/proportionality/preservation provisions/PDF10; and feedback statement/PDF12. Academy promotional material/PDF11 is excluded. This is not an executed agreement or a facsimile read. One ordinary public GET returned403; the response bytes are retained as an error, never the guide's original. The successful reader is retained in priority-referral-guide.reader.txt. That route is closed, with no variant or retry.\n\nThe annual-report ordinary GET succeeded. Retained priority-ipo2023.html SHA256 is `b7f1c94f0df2269776c32aeff112d2f7af7a3ee9da51c1f2046164b40486ab16`. I read its complete Counter infringement section and period/publication/update blocks directly from the original. International visits and unrelated operations appearing in that section are not new findings. No whole annual-report read is claimed. The original, scoped extraction and scoped official-reader capture are distinct in priority-captures.json.\n\nThe August2025 original and2020 police-reader passages were reused locally from the accepted resources wave, not reacquired. Ten focused discovery queries covered exact Gateway/criteria, PIPCU priorities/conflicts/tasking and the exact Steering Group name, followed by the one permitted implementation paragraph. Search results for other police units, Creative, generic prioritisation frameworks, other local-authority intelligence gateways, corporate schemes and the operational form were not opened as substitute criteria. A police search result describing a2025 medicines case is discovery only, not a new case finding or proof the old exclusions were formally revoked. No current guide-adoption or Gateway scoring instrument was located in this finite pass. No branch follows before the combined forest.\n",
        "file": "research/pipcu-priorities-wave-2026-09-09-priority-rules.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources",
        "title": "PIPCU funding, staffing and financial conditions",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED after five useful primary originals and a scoped read of the parallel lane's strategy. Amounts are GBP. PIPCU is treated as a City of London Police unit, not an independently incorporated recipient or a proxy for every City-funded organisation.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED after five useful primary originals and a scoped read of the parallel lane&#x27;s retained strategy. Amounts are GBP. PIPCU is treated as a City of London Police unit, not an independently incorporated recipient or a proxy for every City-funded organisation.</p>\n<p>The strongest finding is a documented public financing route, alongside a future industry co-funding proposal and a historical industry secondment. The records establish resources and their intended purpose. They do not establish that brands buy a right to direct police investigations, or that the announced pilot is already operating.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-commitment-and-actual-financial-transaction\">Current commitment and actual financial transaction</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record and stage</th>\n<th>Payer/recipient path stated by source</th>\n<th>Amount and period</th>\n<th>Boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>IPO FY2025/26 accounts, Note 7: reported payment</td>\n<td>IPO additional dividend to DSIT, used to cover PIPCU costs</td>\n<td>£2,533,000 paid in FY2025/26; £2,624,000 comparative in FY2024/25</td>\n<td>The cost coverage is on an actuals basis since the preceding additional dividend. This is not a PIPCU bank-receipt record or an Ashiko allocation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>9 March 2026 joint IPO/DSIT announcement: confirmed baseline funding commitment</td>\n<td>DSIT via IPO for PIPCU</td>\n<td>Approximately £3,000,000 per year, April 2026–March 2029</td>\n<td>Three-year funding agreement is reported by the Commissioner; its executed terms and payment schedule were not acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Same announcement: planned pilot</td>\n<td>IPO and PIPCU to develop collaborative industry co-funding</td>\n<td>Planned from April 2027; contribution amounts and participants not specified</td>\n<td>Additional enforcement activity is proposed. No pilot payment, participation agreement or exercised donor instruction established.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The [IPO accounts](http[local research file] published 9 July 2026 and covering 1 April 2025–31 March 2026, distinguish the additional dividend from the ordinary dividend. Note 1(o) explains fees/cost recovery and DSIT&#x27;s ability to withdraw surplus through additional dividends. Note 7 and its cashflow paragraph explicitly identify the £2.533m payment. This is evidence of a public financial transaction funded through the IPO trading-fund structure; it is not a reconciliation of subsequent DSIT/IPO/police transfers. Do not substitute the £5.470m ordinary dividend due for the additional PIPCU-related payment, or treat cost coverage since the last dividend as an independently established unit expenditure total for precisely the same financial year.</p>\n<p>The [9 March 2026 announcement](http[local research file] substantive body and Background 3–4, says IPO and PIPCU are working together on pilot priorities and contribution levels. The Commissioner describes public enforcement powers/strategic oversight alongside industry expertise/intelligence; the Alliance for IP expresses willingness to engage. That is a published allocation of proposed roles, not an operational approval clause or proof a private contribution has been accepted. The baseline and pilot also must not be added to the earlier cost-dividend as though all were separate disbursed awards.</p>\n<h2 id=\"police-budget-resource-dependence-and-a-specific-non-public-schedule\">Police budget: resource dependence and a specific non-public schedule</h2>\n<p>The [Revenue and Capital Budget 2025/26 paper](http[local research file] is dated 10 February 2025 for the Resources, Risks &amp; Estates Committee and 12 February 2025 for the Police Authority Board. PDF 1 marks the Board item for decision; the acquired document is a proposed budget, not the approving minute.</p>\n<p>PDF 9 paragraph 12 combines a £0.5m increase in contributions for three funded units—PIPCU, IFED and DCPCU—to meet rising costs. It says unrealised income would require corresponding funded-unit pay/non-pay reductions. No PIPCU-specific share is supplied. This is a documented resource constraint, not a direction to select a particular brand&#x27;s case.</p>\n<p>PDF 17 paragraph 31 expressly locates detailed income in <strong>non-public Appendix 3</strong>, citing sensitive funding streams. PDF 18/Table 9 aggregates staffing by broad business area; it is not a PIPCU establishment. No attempt was made to access the non-public appendix. The paragraph 12 expansion of PIPCU as Police Intellectual Property Office is a source naming anomaly; it does not create a second institution. None of the other units&#x27; resources is attributed to PIPCU here.</p>\n<p>A [24 May 2018 draft financial-plan refresh](http[local research file] PDF 1 and Appendix B/PDF 11, separately forecasts PIPCU–IPO income of £1.613m in each year 2018/19–2022/23, marked unconfirmed. Its accompanying statement says sponsorship/grant agreements should rise with pay awards and that funding arrangements are under review. These are historical planning assumptions and a review statement, not proof those annual amounts were received or that any executed agreement contained automatic indexation. The table was visually checked.</p>\n<h2 id=\"staff-resources-named-historical-contribution-no-current-headcount-inference\">Staff resources: named historical contribution, no current headcount inference</h2>\n<p>The [23 October 2014 government announcement](http[local research file] Notes to Editors 1–4, reports IPO&#x27;s initial £2.56m over two years from September 2013 and a further £3m to 2017. It calls PIPCU operationally independent and reports a 21-person team, with added expertise from two secondees: an IPO Senior Intelligence Officer and a BPI Internet Investigator. I have not calculated an unqualified 23-person establishment from that wording.</p>\n<p>The BPI secondment is a concrete industry-resource connection, stronger than attendance at an event or a logo. Its duration, employer/payroll allocation, access conditions, reporting line and case-selection rights are absent from the acquired source. It must not become a quantified private donation or a current staffing claim. The historical ministerial announcement of additional money is also distinct from a payment ledger.</p>\n<p>The parallel lane&#x27;s retained [2022–2027 counter-infringement strategy](http[local research file] Operation Ashiko paragraph, says one detective managed that operation under PIPCU management oversight, with no charge to referrers or brands. This is a dated operational resource account, not the unit&#x27;s total or current staffing. It also does not exclude every possible resource contribution by industry. Its reported output counts and referral mechanics are owned by the parallel operational packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acceptance-rights-and-the-remaining-discriminator\">Acceptance rights and the remaining discriminator</h2>\n<p>No executed IPO/DSIT–police grant agreement, PIPCU-specific payment/receipt schedule, performance-return acceptance, audit/clawback clause, secondment agreement or pilot participation instrument was acquired. The accounts&#x27; actual-cost basis should not be promoted into an inspected invoice-approval procedure. Likewise, the police paper&#x27;s conditional budget reduction establishes financial dependence without identifying a funder veto over individual investigations.</p>\n<p>The most useful next documents are the announced <strong>2026–2029 funding agreement and financial/assurance schedule</strong>, held by IPO/DSIT and City of London Police; the <strong>BPI secondment instrument</strong>, held by BPI and the police; and, if publicly issued, the <strong>2027 pilot specification</strong>, including eligibility, additionality, priority setting, conflict controls and who accepts contributions. The public budget specifically identifies a non-public detailed schedule; this is a precise record boundary, not proof all grant conditions are secret. No pilot-design or other-unit investigation was opened in this run.</p>\n<p>The defensible competing interpretation is publicly funded policing using private expertise and proposed additional capacity, with case approval governed separately. That interpretation does not remove influence through agenda-setting or inputs; it requires tracing those mechanisms instead of inferring command from money or a secondment alone.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-scope-and-custody\">Reading scope and custody</h2>\n<p>Five original files are retained. All ordinary GETs succeeded; the 2018 financial-plan reader failure was resolved by its one ordinary public GET. No closed Nominet or legislation route was reopened.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Retained original</th>\n<th>Actually read</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>funding-ipo2026.html</td>\n<td>Original HTML Notes 1(o), 7 in full; official reader period/title, agency status and matching notes. No full annual-report read.</td>\n<td>273ff627e0c2c5b987af622c44aed602c1f7dbf6eb536d12ff573369764c61a4</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>funding-commitment2026.html</td>\n<td>Complete substantive article, quotes and Background; matched retained original after official-reader read.</td>\n<td>f6278214cffadb0133aaf7bfec157d7fe120b87adfcb92b824b9d8340ceb927c</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>funding-announcement2014.html</td>\n<td>Complete substantive article and Notes to Editors; matched retained original.</td>\n<td>b99f979b89bd948659ab33e05fab5880099162386c0eae8281e6692098ce36ca</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>funding-colp-budget2025.pdf</td>\n<td>PDF 1–2,9,17–18; PDF 9 and17 visually checked. 30 pages captured, not fully read.</td>\n<td>48b1d02f81b917f72fbb01fc85be24d00e1e177b5be1a31ea4c0ba866931a34a</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>funding-colp-mtfp.pdf</td>\n<td>PDF 1,11–12; PDF 11 visually checked. 13 pages captured, not fully read.</td>\n<td>fe56ce21f21683d1aed7d5e3701a11f2cd9456c3862917add77e0476d7395c55</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The shared strategy original, referral-strategy2022.html, SHA256 <strong>9dcb6d69ad37942b0b4005543be05e9f4561eb854659d149e0f95510067e0654</strong>, was reused without reacquisition or modification. This lane read the complete Ashiko paragraph and neighbouring transition context only. A search result&#x27;s old CAPTCHA-token PIPCU URL and 19-person claim were not opened or used as current staffing. Search-only earlier accounts and unrelated unit records are discovery, not findings. <a>funding-captures.json</a> contains exact URLs, GET observations, reading states, derivative ancestry and source hashes. Acquisition is closed pending the combined forest; no case, current-work, forest, atlas or ZIP edits were made.</p>",
        "path": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09/funding-resources.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ipo-accounts2026",
          "w29-enf-s-police-budget2025",
          "w29-enf-s-police-forecast2018",
          "w29-enf-s-funding2026",
          "w29-enf-s-funding2014"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED after five useful primary originals and a scoped read of the parallel lane's retained strategy. Amounts are GBP. PIPCU is treated as a City of London Police unit, not an independently incorporated recipient or a proxy for every City-funded organisation.\n\nThe strongest finding is a documented public financing route, alongside a future industry co-funding proposal and a historical industry secondment. The records establish resources and their intended purpose. They do not establish that brands buy a right to direct police investigations, or that the announced pilot is already operating.\n\n## Current commitment and actual financial transaction\n\n| Record and stage | Payer/recipient path stated by source | Amount and period | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| IPO FY2025/26 accounts, Note 7: reported payment | IPO additional dividend to DSIT, used to cover PIPCU costs | £2,533,000 paid in FY2025/26; £2,624,000 comparative in FY2024/25 | The cost coverage is on an actuals basis since the preceding additional dividend. This is not a PIPCU bank-receipt record or an Ashiko allocation. |\n| 9 March 2026 joint IPO/DSIT announcement: confirmed baseline funding commitment | DSIT via IPO for PIPCU | Approximately £3,000,000 per year, April 2026–March 2029 | Three-year funding agreement is reported by the Commissioner; its executed terms and payment schedule were not acquired. |\n| Same announcement: planned pilot | IPO and PIPCU to develop collaborative industry co-funding | Planned from April 2027; contribution amounts and participants not specified | Additional enforcement activity is proposed. No pilot payment, participation agreement or exercised donor instruction established. |\n\nThe IPO accounts (see source references) published 9 July 2026 and covering 1 April 2025–31 March 2026, distinguish the additional dividend from the ordinary dividend. Note 1(o) explains fees/cost recovery and DSIT's ability to withdraw surplus through additional dividends. Note 7 and its cashflow paragraph explicitly identify the £2.533m payment. This is evidence of a public financial transaction funded through the IPO trading-fund structure; it is not a reconciliation of subsequent DSIT/IPO/police transfers. Do not substitute the £5.470m ordinary dividend due for the additional PIPCU-related payment, or treat cost coverage since the last dividend as an independently established unit expenditure total for precisely the same financial year.\n\nThe 9 March 2026 announcement (see source references) substantive body and Background 3–4, says IPO and PIPCU are working together on pilot priorities and contribution levels. The Commissioner describes public enforcement powers/strategic oversight alongside industry expertise/intelligence; the Alliance for IP expresses willingness to engage. That is a published allocation of proposed roles, not an operational approval clause or proof a private contribution has been accepted. The baseline and pilot also must not be added to the earlier cost-dividend as though all were separate disbursed awards.\n\n## Police budget: resource dependence and a specific non-public schedule\n\nThe Revenue and Capital Budget 2025/26 paper (see source references) is dated 10 February 2025 for the Resources, Risks & Estates Committee and 12 February 2025 for the Police Authority Board. PDF 1 marks the Board item for decision; the acquired document is a proposed budget, not the approving minute.\n\nPDF 9 paragraph 12 combines a £0.5m increase in contributions for three funded units—PIPCU, IFED and DCPCU—to meet rising costs. It says unrealised income would require corresponding funded-unit pay/non-pay reductions. No PIPCU-specific share is supplied. This is a documented resource constraint, not a direction to select a particular brand's case.\n\nPDF 17 paragraph 31 expressly locates detailed income in **non-public Appendix 3**, citing sensitive funding streams. PDF 18/Table 9 aggregates staffing by broad business area; it is not a PIPCU establishment. No attempt was made to access the non-public appendix. The paragraph 12 expansion of PIPCU as Police Intellectual Property Office is a source naming anomaly; it does not create a second institution. None of the other units' resources is attributed to PIPCU here.\n\nA 24 May 2018 draft financial-plan refresh (see source references) PDF 1 and Appendix B/PDF 11, separately forecasts PIPCU–IPO income of £1.613m in each year 2018/19–2022/23, marked unconfirmed. Its accompanying statement says sponsorship/grant agreements should rise with pay awards and that funding arrangements are under review. These are historical planning assumptions and a review statement, not proof those annual amounts were received or that any executed agreement contained automatic indexation. The table was visually checked.\n\n## Staff resources: named historical contribution, no current headcount inference\n\nThe 23 October 2014 government announcement (see source references) Notes to Editors 1–4, reports IPO's initial £2.56m over two years from September 2013 and a further £3m to 2017. It calls PIPCU operationally independent and reports a 21-person team, with added expertise from two secondees: an IPO Senior Intelligence Officer and a BPI Internet Investigator. I have not calculated an unqualified 23-person establishment from that wording.\n\nThe BPI secondment is a concrete industry-resource connection, stronger than attendance at an event or a logo. Its duration, employer/payroll allocation, access conditions, reporting line and case-selection rights are absent from the acquired source. It must not become a quantified private donation or a current staffing claim. The historical ministerial announcement of additional money is also distinct from a payment ledger.\n\nThe parallel lane's retained 2022–2027 counter-infringement strategy (see source references) Operation Ashiko paragraph, says one detective managed that operation under PIPCU management oversight, with no charge to referrers or brands. This is a dated operational resource account, not the unit's total or current staffing. It also does not exclude every possible resource contribution by industry. Its reported output counts and referral mechanics are owned by the parallel operational packet.\n\n## Acceptance rights and the remaining discriminator\n\nNo executed IPO/DSIT–police grant agreement, PIPCU-specific payment/receipt schedule, performance-return acceptance, audit/clawback clause, secondment agreement or pilot participation instrument was acquired. The accounts' actual-cost basis should not be promoted into an inspected invoice-approval procedure. Likewise, the police paper's conditional budget reduction establishes financial dependence without identifying a funder veto over individual investigations.\n\nThe most useful next documents are the announced **2026–2029 funding agreement and financial/assurance schedule**, held by IPO/DSIT and City of London Police; the **BPI secondment instrument**, held by BPI and the police; and, if publicly issued, the **2027 pilot specification**, including eligibility, additionality, priority setting, conflict controls and who accepts contributions. The public budget specifically identifies a non-public detailed schedule; this is a precise record boundary, not proof all grant conditions are secret. No pilot-design or other-unit investigation was opened in this run.\n\nThe defensible competing interpretation is publicly funded policing using private expertise and proposed additional capacity, with case approval governed separately. That interpretation does not remove influence through agenda-setting or inputs; it requires tracing those mechanisms instead of inferring command from money or a secondment alone.\n\n## Reading scope and custody\n\nFive original files are retained. All ordinary GETs succeeded; the 2018 financial-plan reader failure was resolved by its one ordinary public GET. No closed Nominet or legislation route was reopened.\n\n| Retained original | Actually read | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| funding-ipo2026.html | Original HTML Notes 1(o), 7 in full; official reader period/title, agency status and matching notes. No full annual-report read. | 273ff627e0c2c5b987af622c44aed602c1f7dbf6eb536d12ff573369764c61a4 |\n| funding-commitment2026.html | Complete substantive article, quotes and Background; matched retained original after official-reader read. | f6278214cffadb0133aaf7bfec157d7fe120b87adfcb92b824b9d8340ceb927c |\n| funding-announcement2014.html | Complete substantive article and Notes to Editors; matched retained original. | b99f979b89bd948659ab33e05fab5880099162386c0eae8281e6692098ce36ca |\n| funding-colp-budget2025.pdf | PDF 1–2,9,17–18; PDF 9 and17 visually checked. 30 pages captured, not fully read. | 48b1d02f81b917f72fbb01fc85be24d00e1e177b5be1a31ea4c0ba866931a34a |\n| funding-colp-mtfp.pdf | PDF 1,11–12; PDF 11 visually checked. 13 pages captured, not fully read. | fe56ce21f21683d1aed7d5e3701a11f2cd9456c3862917add77e0476d7395c55 |\n\nThe shared strategy original, referral-strategy2022.html, SHA256 **9dcb6d69ad37942b0b4005543be05e9f4561eb854659d149e0f95510067e0654**, was reused without reacquisition or modification. This lane read the complete Ashiko paragraph and neighbouring transition context only. A search result's old CAPTCHA-token PIPCU URL and 19-person claim were not opened or used as current staffing. Search-only earlier accounts and unrelated unit records are discovery, not findings. funding-captures.json contains exact URLs, GET observations, reading states, derivative ancestry and source hashes. Acquisition is closed pending the combined forest; no case, current-work, forest, atlas or ZIP edits were made.\n",
        "file": "research/pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision",
        "title": "Operation Ashiko: private referrals, police approval and registry action",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. Four primary substantive records, plus the previously accepted registry-policy packet. Local overlap was completed by root before acquisition; no existing case-r27 Ashiko/PIPCU coverage was found. No complaint form, domain, harmful material, account, paid route or operational endpoint was used.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. Four primary substantive records, plus the previously accepted registry-policy packet. Local overlap was completed by root before acquisition; no existing case-r27 Ashiko/PIPCU coverage was found. No complaint form, domain, harmful material, account, paid route or operational endpoint was used.</p>\n<p>The public chain has several decision points. Rights holders supply intelligence and evidence; a police policy assigns approval to a senior police officer; registrars and Nominet act under their own terms. A later IPO announcement adds initial assessment and prioritisation before possible law-enforcement referral. These records establish a process and reported activity, not a private complainant&#x27;s right to compel suspension or proof that the safeguards worked in an individual case.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-actual-police-administrative-instrument\">The actual police administrative instrument</h2>\n<p>The official [Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy](http[local research file] dated 22 June 2020, version 1.2–20, identifies individual brands and enforcement agencies as intelligence/evidence sources (§2, PDF4). It describes a Nominet agreement for action without a court order, contingent on police investigation and due diligence (§4, PDF6–7). If necessary, brands, representatives or trade bodies confirm infringement (§8, PDF9). Every submitted suspension requires PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector authorisation (§9, PDF9).</p>\n<p>The notice asks the registrar to investigate terms breaches and act; after 48 hours without registrar action, PIPCU requests Nominet investigate and act if it finds a breach (§7, PDF8). Its requested duration is a minimum of 24 months, or the domain expiry if sooner. A registrant alleging error should contact PIPCU within the first 48 hours; police reassess and consider remediation, responding only to the WHOIS registrant or documented representative (§10, PDF9). Section11, PDF10 points to police complaints. The policy does not document an actual reversal here.</p>\n<p>This is the posted 2020 instrument, not an executed inter-party agreement or proof every clause still governs after later changes. The current-linked 2026 CPP is separately analysed in <a href=\"/research/nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority\">policy-authority.md</a>. In particular, the older expiry wording should not silently replace the current CPP&#x27;s .UK minimum-duration rule.</p>\n<h2 id=\"initial-intake-changed-in-august-2025\">Initial intake changed in August 2025</h2>\n<p>The IPO&#x27;s [12 August 2025 announcement](http[local research file] says that from <strong>11 August 2025</strong> the IPO Intelligence Gateway replaces the previous PIPCU referral form for IP rights holders and enforcement partners. Its team first assesses and prioritises submissions. It can develop intelligence itself or refer to a law-enforcement agency; it liaises with PIPCU, Trading Standards and other agencies about possible disruption. College of Policing-trained intelligence officers/managers work with IPO analysts, financial investigators and regional IP Crime Coordinators. Public reporting is separately directed to Trading Standards or Crimestoppers.</p>\n<p>Thus a current description that sends every brand directly to the old PIPCU form would be stale. The announcement does not amend Ashiko&#x27;s named suspension approver, guarantee referral, publish priority scores or establish that every possible intelligence channel must use this form. The form link was observed but neither opened nor used. Read the complete substantive body and publication/update date, reader lines53–75; the retained HTML corroborates them.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-dated-account-of-delivery-and-its-limits\">A dated account of delivery and its limits</h2>\n<p>The PIPCU contribution to the official [IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19](http[local research file] <strong>PDF59/printed55</strong>, describes brand-owner and supplier referrals supported by counterfeit-trading evidence, imaging of websites for evidence, then details sent to Nominet. It reports <strong>32,995 websites suspended for 2018/19</strong>. This is an attributed police contribution in a government publication, not independent domain-by-domain verification; exact start/end dates beyond its period label are not supplied in that passage.</p>\n<p>The adjacent <strong>32,927 requests / 32,669 from PIPCU</strong> cite a November 2018 Nominet report in footnote35. The same volume&#x27;s Nominet spread, <strong>PDF56/printed52</strong>, explicitly covers <strong>1 November 2017–31 October 2018</strong>. Therefore the figures must not be treated as matched inputs and outputs for one period, or subtracted to produce an error/refusal rate. Both pages were visually inspected from retained original bytes. The neighbouring Operation Creative/IWL and Operation Methone material concerns separate interventions and is excluded from the Ashiko mechanism.</p>\n<p>The IPO&#x27;s [4 February 2022 strategy](http[local research file] the Operation Ashiko paragraph under future challenges, reports over115,000 sites removed from .UK, Nominet administrative checks and registrar implementation. It describes one detective with PIPCU management oversight and no charge to brands/referrers. These are a dated account of resources and delivery, not current headcount, a unit budget, proof of negligible total social cost or a cumulative total to September2026. Its preceding industry-intelligence/IWL paragraph describes Operation Creative; that stronger wording is not imported into Ashiko. The later all-TLD cumulative account root read in the 2025 Impact Issue is likewise not an annual Nominet-only count.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-remains-unproved\">What remains unproved</h2>\n<p>The evidence separates three questions: who supplies allegations, who approves a police request, and who implements a contractual registry decision. An investigator&#x27;s reliance on private expertise can influence which sites are examined without granting that supplier approval power. Conversely, the existence of a police sign-off rule does not establish the independence or quality of each assessment. No original brand dossier, completed DCI approval, particular registry determination, named error reversal or reinstatement trace was acquired.</p>\n<p>The finite next discriminator is a redacted end-to-end administrative file: referral and supporting evidence, IPO triage if applicable, police due-diligence/sign-off record, registrar/Nominet determination and any challenge/remediation. The underlying police–Nominet agreement and the current Gateway prioritisation criteria would resolve a narrower rules-versus-practice gap. Likely custodians are PIPCU/City of London Police, IPO Intelligence Gateway and Nominet registry/legal operations. No contact was attempted or authorised. Funding, staffing and financial conditions remain the parallel finance packet, not inferred from brand participation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-closed-routes\">Source custody and closed routes</h2>\n<p><a>referral-captures.json</a> records source URLs, dates, exact reading scopes, original and derivative hashes. Original official HTML was retained for the Gateway and strategy; the government-published 136-page 2018–19 report was retained, but only its cover, PDF56, PDF58 attribution context and PDF59 were text-inspected, with PDF56 and59 visually inspected. No whole-report read is claimed. The full Gateway substantive body and the strategy&#x27;s Ashiko paragraph/publication date were read from originals; other returned strategy passages do not support new findings.</p>\n<p>The police PDF&#x27;s ordinary GET returned403; that route is closed. Its substantive policy sections2–11, PDF4–10, were read through the successful official reader, plus cover/date. No original PDF hash or facsimile inspection is claimed for that policy. Later generic privacy pages were incidentally returned but were not audited or treated as an Ashiko-specific correction protocol. Existing Nominet failures were not retried. Four focused discovery queries were used; third-party forum allegations, biographies and unrelated Ashiko/IWF names were excluded. No new branch follows this packet before root&#x27;s forest review.</p>",
        "path": "pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09/referral-decision.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w29-enf-s-ashiko-policy2020",
          "w29-enf-s-gateway2025",
          "w29-enf-s-delivery2019",
          "w29-enf-s-strategy2022"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition CLOSED. Four primary substantive records, plus the previously accepted registry-policy packet. Local overlap was completed by root before acquisition; no existing case-r27 Ashiko/PIPCU coverage was found. No complaint form, domain, harmful material, account, paid route or operational endpoint was used.\n\nThe public chain has several decision points. Rights holders supply intelligence and evidence; a police policy assigns approval to a senior police officer; registrars and Nominet act under their own terms. A later IPO announcement adds initial assessment and prioritisation before possible law-enforcement referral. These records establish a process and reported activity, not a private complainant's right to compel suspension or proof that the safeguards worked in an individual case.\n\n## The actual police administrative instrument\n\nThe official Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy (see source references) dated 22 June 2020, version 1.2–20, identifies individual brands and enforcement agencies as intelligence/evidence sources (§2, PDF4). It describes a Nominet agreement for action without a court order, contingent on police investigation and due diligence (§4, PDF6–7). If necessary, brands, representatives or trade bodies confirm infringement (§8, PDF9). Every submitted suspension requires PIPCU Detective Chief Inspector authorisation (§9, PDF9).\n\nThe notice asks the registrar to investigate terms breaches and act; after 48 hours without registrar action, PIPCU requests Nominet investigate and act if it finds a breach (§7, PDF8). Its requested duration is a minimum of 24 months, or the domain expiry if sooner. A registrant alleging error should contact PIPCU within the first 48 hours; police reassess and consider remediation, responding only to the WHOIS registrant or documented representative (§10, PDF9). Section11, PDF10 points to police complaints. The policy does not document an actual reversal here.\n\nThis is the posted 2020 instrument, not an executed inter-party agreement or proof every clause still governs after later changes. The current-linked 2026 CPP is separately analysed in [policy-authority.md](nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority.md). In particular, the older expiry wording should not silently replace the current CPP's .UK minimum-duration rule.\n\n## Initial intake changed in August 2025\n\nThe IPO's 12 August 2025 announcement (see source references) says that from **11 August 2025** the IPO Intelligence Gateway replaces the previous PIPCU referral form for IP rights holders and enforcement partners. Its team first assesses and prioritises submissions. It can develop intelligence itself or refer to a law-enforcement agency; it liaises with PIPCU, Trading Standards and other agencies about possible disruption. College of Policing-trained intelligence officers/managers work with IPO analysts, financial investigators and regional IP Crime Coordinators. Public reporting is separately directed to Trading Standards or Crimestoppers.\n\nThus a current description that sends every brand directly to the old PIPCU form would be stale. The announcement does not amend Ashiko's named suspension approver, guarantee referral, publish priority scores or establish that every possible intelligence channel must use this form. The form link was observed but neither opened nor used. Read the complete substantive body and publication/update date, reader lines53–75; the retained HTML corroborates them.\n\n## A dated account of delivery and its limits\n\nThe PIPCU contribution to the official IP Crime and Enforcement Report 2018–19 (see source references) **PDF59/printed55**, describes brand-owner and supplier referrals supported by counterfeit-trading evidence, imaging of websites for evidence, then details sent to Nominet. It reports **32,995 websites suspended for 2018/19**. This is an attributed police contribution in a government publication, not independent domain-by-domain verification; exact start/end dates beyond its period label are not supplied in that passage.\n\nThe adjacent **32,927 requests / 32,669 from PIPCU** cite a November 2018 Nominet report in footnote35. The same volume's Nominet spread, **PDF56/printed52**, explicitly covers **1 November 2017–31 October 2018**. Therefore the figures must not be treated as matched inputs and outputs for one period, or subtracted to produce an error/refusal rate. Both pages were visually inspected from retained original bytes. The neighbouring Operation Creative/IWL and Operation Methone material concerns separate interventions and is excluded from the Ashiko mechanism.\n\nThe IPO's 4 February 2022 strategy (see source references) the Operation Ashiko paragraph under future challenges, reports over115,000 sites removed from .UK, Nominet administrative checks and registrar implementation. It describes one detective with PIPCU management oversight and no charge to brands/referrers. These are a dated account of resources and delivery, not current headcount, a unit budget, proof of negligible total social cost or a cumulative total to September2026. Its preceding industry-intelligence/IWL paragraph describes Operation Creative; that stronger wording is not imported into Ashiko. The later all-TLD cumulative account root read in the 2025 Impact Issue is likewise not an annual Nominet-only count.\n\n## What remains unproved\n\nThe evidence separates three questions: who supplies allegations, who approves a police request, and who implements a contractual registry decision. An investigator's reliance on private expertise can influence which sites are examined without granting that supplier approval power. Conversely, the existence of a police sign-off rule does not establish the independence or quality of each assessment. No original brand dossier, completed DCI approval, particular registry determination, named error reversal or reinstatement trace was acquired.\n\nThe finite next discriminator is a redacted end-to-end administrative file: referral and supporting evidence, IPO triage if applicable, police due-diligence/sign-off record, registrar/Nominet determination and any challenge/remediation. The underlying police–Nominet agreement and the current Gateway prioritisation criteria would resolve a narrower rules-versus-practice gap. Likely custodians are PIPCU/City of London Police, IPO Intelligence Gateway and Nominet registry/legal operations. No contact was attempted or authorised. Funding, staffing and financial conditions remain the parallel finance packet, not inferred from brand participation.\n\n## Source custody and closed routes\n\nreferral-captures.json records source URLs, dates, exact reading scopes, original and derivative hashes. Original official HTML was retained for the Gateway and strategy; the government-published 136-page 2018–19 report was retained, but only its cover, PDF56, PDF58 attribution context and PDF59 were text-inspected, with PDF56 and59 visually inspected. No whole-report read is claimed. The full Gateway substantive body and the strategy's Ashiko paragraph/publication date were read from originals; other returned strategy passages do not support new findings.\n\nThe police PDF's ordinary GET returned403; that route is closed. Its substantive policy sections2–11, PDF4–10, were read through the successful official reader, plus cover/date. No original PDF hash or facsimile inspection is claimed for that policy. Later generic privacy pages were incidentally returned but were not audited or treated as an Ashiko-specific correction protocol. Existing Nominet failures were not retried. Four focused discovery queries were used; third-party forum allegations, biographies and unrelated Ashiko/IWF names were excluded. No new branch follows this packet before root's forest review.\n",
        "file": "research/pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-referral-decision.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct",
        "title": "GIFCT: organizational authority, financing and signal correction",
        "description": "Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source run; no database access, harmful-content inspection, account, outreach or payment. No canonical case changes. This packet separates current public descriptions, dated instruments and reported operation. It does not decide the legal effect of Australia's DIS section6; root owns that statutory connect",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source run; no database access, harmful-content inspection, account, outreach or payment. No canonical case changes. This packet separates current public descriptions, dated instruments and reported operation. It does not decide the legal effect of Australia&#x27;s DIS section6; root owns that statutory connection and the BSR assessment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-acquired-structure-establishes\">What the acquired structure establishes</h2>\n<p>GIFCT has a company-led governing body, membership conditions and a disciplinary mechanism controlling access to shared infrastructure. The providers retain responsibility for their own moderation decisions. A shared hash can therefore transmit an upstream classification without itself constituting a universal removal order. Correction inside that infrastructure is documented; downstream restoration remains a separate evidentiary question.</p>\n<p><strong>Current organizational structure.</strong> The official governance page identifies Meta, Microsoft and YouTube as founding-company Operating Board members, with Discord and Twitch the elected at-large members for 2026; Meta chairs in 2026. The general membership elects at-large members annually. The Board supplies strategic guidance and oversight. The current IAC roster includes Australia&#x27;s Department of Home Affairs in an advisory role; that role is not database access. The IAC advises on priorities and performance, has a civil-society majority and a nongovernment chair. The current page states the Operating Board periodically reviews IAC composition. Source: [current governance](http[local research file] substantive lines65–151, observed9September 2026. Current roster is not the 2021 roster.</p>\n<p>The official FAQ describes GIFCT as a501(c)(3) nonprofit, daily operations led by Executive Director Naureen Chowdhury Fink, member funding since inception and nonfounder contributions from 2021. This is an organizational self-description; it is not an independently acquired incorporation document. [Explainers](http[local research file] lines69–121 and footer. A bounded secondary tax-index search identifies the probable legal entity <strong>Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism Inc., EIN 84-4586487</strong>. The original return content was not acquired, so that identifier remains a retrieval lead, not independently established primary legal identity here.</p>\n<p><strong>Dated financing and membership changes.</strong> The 2025 annual report records $3,760,921 in combined member/external contributions and $3,239,223 expenses, of which $2,296,459 is programming/delivery. Within that category it allocates $215,588 to incident response/HSDB, $1,226,367 member support, $391,669 GNET, $347,193 engagement/events and $115,642 working groups. These are report-level figures, not audited accounts, bank receipts or donor-specific allocations; the table uses the dollar symbol without separately labeling currency. Mandatory membership dues began in 2025. The report says membership support moved from a partner-based model to GIFCT&#x27;s own MAP; its diagram places confirmation of full membership with GIFCT, members and Operating Board, without publishing a precise voting threshold. X ended membership in 2025, attributed to its focus on internal trust/safety; the source does not report expulsion. Source: [2025 Annual and Transparency Report](http[local research file] PDF 7–9,28,30; printed9–14,46,49. Do not reconstruct a donor&#x27;s content veto from financial support.</p>\n<p><strong>The access gate.</strong> The current membership page requires annual tiered dues and six substantive criteria, including a public terrorism/violent-extremism prohibition, a functioning reports/appeals route, relevant technical interest, transparency and human-rights commitments. The public resource guide expressly says GIFCT assists policy drafting but does not prescribe exact wording. Sources: [membership](http[local research file] lines65–87,171–187; <a>resource guide</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-decides-a-hash-qualifies-and-what-happens-afterward\">Who decides a hash qualifies, and what happens afterward</h2>\n<p>The current HSDB page distinguishes exact cryptographic matching from perceptual similarity and describes member-supplied hashes and labels, with agreement/disagreement feedback. It says GIFCT does not dictate enforcement. [HSDB](http[local research file] substantive lines65–89. The 2025 report adds that GIFCT itself can create hashes and limits access to GIFCT plus member technology companies completing the information-sharing agreement. It expressly separates matching from each platform&#x27;s independent action; its listed companies are integrated <strong>or integrating</strong>, not all proved operational. Same annual report, PDF 11/printed17.</p>\n<p>The currently linked <strong>December 2022 v1.0 taxonomy</strong> supplies distinct qualifying routes: UN-sanctioned terrorist entities, qualifying perpetrator/incident content, or a behavior framework. The behavioral route requires more than a general ideological label: the document combines nongovernment status, a distinguishable extremist identifier, a hate-based mission and advocacy of civilian/vigilante violence toward that mission. Its URL provision names TAT&#x27;s TCAP but says GIFCT includes associated hashes only when GIFCT&#x27;s own inclusion parameters also hold. This is a filter between systems, not automatic import of every TCAP designation. [Taxonomy](http[local research file] PDF 3–5. Its incident terminology is historically dated; do not silently carry 2022 IRF details across the 2025 revision.</p>\n<p><strong>Actual correction, with a meaningful limit.</strong> The 2022 report describes a member sampling/review exercise, corrected labels and removed hashes. It says another member sees a contributor&#x27;s removal the next time it accesses the database. Separately, feedback on two hashes led the contributor to revisit a nonviolent music video and remove the hashes; some hashes were also removed cautiously when originals were no longer retained. Source:2022 report PDF 32–35. Its feedback sample is explicitly nonrandom and cannot establish a whole-database false-positive rate. The 2025 report still describes member review/removal, varying original-content retention and feedback on about2% of hashes. Same annual report PDF 13/printed21. Neither establishes that a removed hash compelled a member to restore a post or account. No universal signal-expiry period or downstream correction service-level agreement was acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"enforcement-of-member-rules-separate-from-user-appeals\">Enforcement of member rules, separate from user appeals</h2>\n<p>The 2025 annual report&#x27;s PDF 11 link points directly to <strong>Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0,2022</strong>. Its public version omits detailed acceptable-use examples for operational security. Leadership enforces after consulting the affected organization and in consultation with the Operating Board. Available sanctions run from correction/warning to temporary technology bans, permanent bans or membership revocation, with graduated Board/IAC/public disclosure. An accused organization has10business days after notification to appeal; the Board has30business days to affirm, change or reverse and may consult the IAC. Its determination is final within this process. This is an organizational access appeal, not a platform user&#x27;s content remedy. Source: [Code](http[local research file] all6pages, especiallyPDF 2–5. The existence of authority is established; no specific disciplinary exercise was proved in this run.</p>\n<p><strong>Advisory independence has defined dependencies.</strong> The current governance page links a January 2026-path IAC TOR whose first page calls the text <strong>draft</strong>. Its7pages provide a nongovernment majority, IAC election of its chair, that chair&#x27;s nonvoting Board participation and remuneration by GIFCT. They provide Board endorsement of appointments, budgeted secretariat/participation support, reciprocal summarized minutes and formal Board responses to IAC recommendations. Conflict provisions require disclosure and recorded recusal for direct interests, while allowing specified exceptions. The chair/secretariat are therefore structurally supported by the organization being advised; this is disclosed architecture, not proof of compromised judgment. Signed/adopted status and actual minutes/recusals were not acquired. [Current-linked TOR](http[local research file] PDF 1–7, especially1–5. The upload directory is not an established enactment date.</p>\n<h2 id=\"forest-implications-and-finite-frontier\">Forest implications and finite frontier</h2>\n<p>The strongest next discriminating record is the <strong>information-sharing agreement&#x27;s correction clause plus one paired correction receipt</strong>: originating classification withdrawal, delivery to a receiving platform, its acknowledged review and actual disposition. This would separate interoperable correction from reversible enforcement. GIFCT/member custodians hold those records; the public code does not supply them.</p>\n<p>For money and authority, the missing record is current audited/IRS financial detail joined to an actual donor agreement or board instrument identifying budget approval and any earmarked decision rights. Current reports establish resources and membership dues, not per-funder operational commands. The EIN lead above is useful for a later selected finance run; it is not a reason to expand this one.</p>\n<p>Candidate relations are typed as: Operating Board→GIFCT strategic/governance oversight; member→GIFCT dues obligation; GIFCT→eligible member shared-tool access; member/GIFCT→HSDB taxonomy-qualified signal contribution; HSDB→provider identification input; provider→its content independent policy action; contributor→HSDB reported correction; Board→disciplined organization final internal appeal decision. The IAC→Board relation is advice, not a veto; Home Affairs→IAC is participation, not database access. These distinctions preserve both shared upstream influence and independent recipient discretion. No new nodes or edges were written into the case.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-custody-and-closed-routes\">Reading custody and closed routes</h2>\n<p>All nine originals listed below were acquired by an ordinary unauthenticated GET and hash-checked again before closure. Their complete URLs, timestamps, original/derivative state and exact reading scopes are in <strong>gifct-captures.json</strong>. Original retention does not imply a full read. Annual-report page numbers here are PDF pages; some PDF pages contain printed spreads. The 2025 report was reached from GIFCT&#x27;s transparency page; taxonomy from the current HSDB page; TOR from current governance; Code from the report&#x27;s exact PDF 11 link annotation.</p>\n<p>Resource-guide web-reader text was read only through lines80–131 for the policy and appeals statements. The original page&#x27;s full body was not retained. The initial Code-link text extraction returned no link; reading the report&#x27;s own PDF link annotation resolved the document. A large first PDF extraction was truncated; decisive omitted TOR and annual pages were reread in compact page-specific form. The saved <strong>gifct-scoped-extracts.txt</strong> is a normalized derivative of listed PDF ranges, not an original or a transcript of a full-report read (SHA256 a0bd63ee596773e9e901425dd3bbda85367b2f62e58ec3a7035d0a9c42c58535).</p>\n<p>Legal-identity route: [ProPublica&#x27;s IRS-derived index](http[local research file] and [2023 return wrapper](http[local research file] identify the entity/EIN and iframe locations. The two nested IRS990PF/ScheduleB readers returned nonretryable unsafe-open errors. Those routes were closed without alternative retrieval; no tax-return contents or donor names from that unacquired filing are relied upon. The legal identifier is therefore expressly secondary in this packet. No other funder or organization branch was opened. Root&#x27;s BSR 2021/2026-policy lane and Hubble&#x27;s TAT lane remain separate.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Original file</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-explainers.html</td>\n<td>eeae05820d80252a603dc8e3c7eb34e32bcb137615eda3835c805845eb37b9e5</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-governance.html</td>\n<td>cc2fe3e4666a9d9b6ed376047cabb3de743e5f3bbe94325a79fc7b6e2719ce26</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-membership.html</td>\n<td>c4a3ff9e97fc38e829bda7116869efe27f9e99c8d6e1b7a60039620bdb7a9f3f</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-hsdb.html</td>\n<td>00e76f2317df4ab6498c0dbf438b6fec0d472606d11afe23fd3676c40bd89c7d</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-annual2025.pdf</td>\n<td>dc22bea68d28284bb40b201da8a7e4a227f4eed7ea48eae1d6080383f4ec7e00</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-taxonomy2022.pdf</td>\n<td>d4c084c9ac1b330fd72a2c607446fcdd50f0fab93631d2e09b8fef2479a13571</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-iac-tor2026.pdf</td>\n<td>e77733eb7bf9fe96453108686c55a9e2708d64df7d0acc7ed6cf4db05f344af8</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-transparency2022.pdf</td>\n<td>1b7c2847247fe7388eefe3b0f70d237d6923082f22f01407d32ced2ee2bb8422</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>gifct-code2022.pdf</td>\n<td>0366c204ea1be5b547ccdd179e0c09cc8b16e6b28512aec6b739bc8c23a94863</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>",
        "path": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/gifct.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-governance",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-membership",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-explainers",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hsdb",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-annual2025",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-taxonomy2022",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-iac-draft",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-corrections2022",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-code2022"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source run; no database access, harmful-content inspection, account, outreach or payment. No canonical case changes. This packet separates current public descriptions, dated instruments and reported operation. It does not decide the legal effect of Australia's DIS section6; root owns that statutory connection and the BSR assessment.\n\n## What the acquired structure establishes\n\nGIFCT has a company-led governing body, membership conditions and a disciplinary mechanism controlling access to shared infrastructure. The providers retain responsibility for their own moderation decisions. A shared hash can therefore transmit an upstream classification without itself constituting a universal removal order. Correction inside that infrastructure is documented; downstream restoration remains a separate evidentiary question.\n\n**Current organizational structure.** The official governance page identifies Meta, Microsoft and YouTube as founding-company Operating Board members, with Discord and Twitch the elected at-large members for 2026; Meta chairs in 2026. The general membership elects at-large members annually. The Board supplies strategic guidance and oversight. The current IAC roster includes Australia's Department of Home Affairs in an advisory role; that role is not database access. The IAC advises on priorities and performance, has a civil-society majority and a nongovernment chair. The current page states the Operating Board periodically reviews IAC composition. Source: current governance (see source references) substantive lines65–151, observed9September 2026. Current roster is not the 2021 roster.\n\nThe official FAQ describes GIFCT as a501(c)(3) nonprofit, daily operations led by Executive Director Naureen Chowdhury Fink, member funding since inception and nonfounder contributions from 2021. This is an organizational self-description; it is not an independently acquired incorporation document. Explainers (see source references) lines69–121 and footer. A bounded secondary tax-index search identifies the probable legal entity **Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism Inc., EIN 84-4586487**. The original return content was not acquired, so that identifier remains a retrieval lead, not independently established primary legal identity here.\n\n**Dated financing and membership changes.** The 2025 annual report records $3,760,921 in combined member/external contributions and $3,239,223 expenses, of which $2,296,459 is programming/delivery. Within that category it allocates $215,588 to incident response/HSDB, $1,226,367 member support, $391,669 GNET, $347,193 engagement/events and $115,642 working groups. These are report-level figures, not audited accounts, bank receipts or donor-specific allocations; the table uses the dollar symbol without separately labeling currency. Mandatory membership dues began in 2025. The report says membership support moved from a partner-based model to GIFCT's own MAP; its diagram places confirmation of full membership with GIFCT, members and Operating Board, without publishing a precise voting threshold. X ended membership in 2025, attributed to its focus on internal trust/safety; the source does not report expulsion. Source: 2025 Annual and Transparency Report (see source references) PDF 7–9,28,30; printed9–14,46,49. Do not reconstruct a donor's content veto from financial support.\n\n**The access gate.** The current membership page requires annual tiered dues and six substantive criteria, including a public terrorism/violent-extremism prohibition, a functioning reports/appeals route, relevant technical interest, transparency and human-rights commitments. The public resource guide expressly says GIFCT assists policy drafting but does not prescribe exact wording. Sources: membership (see source references) lines65–87,171–187; resource guide.\n\n## Who decides a hash qualifies, and what happens afterward\n\nThe current HSDB page distinguishes exact cryptographic matching from perceptual similarity and describes member-supplied hashes and labels, with agreement/disagreement feedback. It says GIFCT does not dictate enforcement. HSDB (see source references) substantive lines65–89. The 2025 report adds that GIFCT itself can create hashes and limits access to GIFCT plus member technology companies completing the information-sharing agreement. It expressly separates matching from each platform's independent action; its listed companies are integrated **or integrating**, not all proved operational. Same annual report, PDF 11/printed17.\n\nThe currently linked **December 2022 v1.0 taxonomy** supplies distinct qualifying routes: UN-sanctioned terrorist entities, qualifying perpetrator/incident content, or a behavior framework. The behavioral route requires more than a general ideological label: the document combines nongovernment status, a distinguishable extremist identifier, a hate-based mission and advocacy of civilian/vigilante violence toward that mission. Its URL provision names TAT's TCAP but says GIFCT includes associated hashes only when GIFCT's own inclusion parameters also hold. This is a filter between systems, not automatic import of every TCAP designation. Taxonomy (see source references) PDF 3–5. Its incident terminology is historically dated; do not silently carry 2022 IRF details across the 2025 revision.\n\n**Actual correction, with a meaningful limit.** The 2022 report describes a member sampling/review exercise, corrected labels and removed hashes. It says another member sees a contributor's removal the next time it accesses the database. Separately, feedback on two hashes led the contributor to revisit a nonviolent music video and remove the hashes; some hashes were also removed cautiously when originals were no longer retained. Source:2022 report PDF 32–35. Its feedback sample is explicitly nonrandom and cannot establish a whole-database false-positive rate. The 2025 report still describes member review/removal, varying original-content retention and feedback on about2% of hashes. Same annual report PDF 13/printed21. Neither establishes that a removed hash compelled a member to restore a post or account. No universal signal-expiry period or downstream correction service-level agreement was acquired.\n\n## Enforcement of member rules, separate from user appeals\n\nThe 2025 annual report's PDF 11 link points directly to **Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0,2022**. Its public version omits detailed acceptable-use examples for operational security. Leadership enforces after consulting the affected organization and in consultation with the Operating Board. Available sanctions run from correction/warning to temporary technology bans, permanent bans or membership revocation, with graduated Board/IAC/public disclosure. An accused organization has10business days after notification to appeal; the Board has30business days to affirm, change or reverse and may consult the IAC. Its determination is final within this process. This is an organizational access appeal, not a platform user's content remedy. Source: Code (see source references) all6pages, especiallyPDF 2–5. The existence of authority is established; no specific disciplinary exercise was proved in this run.\n\n**Advisory independence has defined dependencies.** The current governance page links a January 2026-path IAC TOR whose first page calls the text **draft**. Its7pages provide a nongovernment majority, IAC election of its chair, that chair's nonvoting Board participation and remuneration by GIFCT. They provide Board endorsement of appointments, budgeted secretariat/participation support, reciprocal summarized minutes and formal Board responses to IAC recommendations. Conflict provisions require disclosure and recorded recusal for direct interests, while allowing specified exceptions. The chair/secretariat are therefore structurally supported by the organization being advised; this is disclosed architecture, not proof of compromised judgment. Signed/adopted status and actual minutes/recusals were not acquired. Current-linked TOR (see source references) PDF 1–7, especially1–5. The upload directory is not an established enactment date.\n\n## Forest implications and finite frontier\n\nThe strongest next discriminating record is the **information-sharing agreement's correction clause plus one paired correction receipt**: originating classification withdrawal, delivery to a receiving platform, its acknowledged review and actual disposition. This would separate interoperable correction from reversible enforcement. GIFCT/member custodians hold those records; the public code does not supply them.\n\nFor money and authority, the missing record is current audited/IRS financial detail joined to an actual donor agreement or board instrument identifying budget approval and any earmarked decision rights. Current reports establish resources and membership dues, not per-funder operational commands. The EIN lead above is useful for a later selected finance run; it is not a reason to expand this one.\n\nCandidate relations are typed as: Operating Board→GIFCT strategic/governance oversight; member→GIFCT dues obligation; GIFCT→eligible member shared-tool access; member/GIFCT→HSDB taxonomy-qualified signal contribution; HSDB→provider identification input; provider→its content independent policy action; contributor→HSDB reported correction; Board→disciplined organization final internal appeal decision. The IAC→Board relation is advice, not a veto; Home Affairs→IAC is participation, not database access. These distinctions preserve both shared upstream influence and independent recipient discretion. No new nodes or edges were written into the case.\n\n## Reading custody and closed routes\n\nAll nine originals listed below were acquired by an ordinary unauthenticated GET and hash-checked again before closure. Their complete URLs, timestamps, original/derivative state and exact reading scopes are in **gifct-captures.json**. Original retention does not imply a full read. Annual-report page numbers here are PDF pages; some PDF pages contain printed spreads. The 2025 report was reached from GIFCT's transparency page; taxonomy from the current HSDB page; TOR from current governance; Code from the report's exact PDF 11 link annotation.\n\nResource-guide web-reader text was read only through lines80–131 for the policy and appeals statements. The original page's full body was not retained. The initial Code-link text extraction returned no link; reading the report's own PDF link annotation resolved the document. A large first PDF extraction was truncated; decisive omitted TOR and annual pages were reread in compact page-specific form. The saved **gifct-scoped-extracts.txt** is a normalized derivative of listed PDF ranges, not an original or a transcript of a full-report read (SHA256 a0bd63ee596773e9e901425dd3bbda85367b2f62e58ec3a7035d0a9c42c58535).\n\nLegal-identity route: ProPublica's IRS-derived index (see source references) and 2023 return wrapper (see source references) identify the entity/EIN and iframe locations. The two nested IRS990PF/ScheduleB readers returned nonretryable unsafe-open errors. Those routes were closed without alternative retrieval; no tax-return contents or donor names from that unacquired filing are relied upon. The legal identifier is therefore expressly secondary in this packet. No other funder or organization branch was opened. Root's BSR 2021/2026-policy lane and Hubble's TAT lane remain separate.\n\n| Original file | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- |\n| gifct-explainers.html | eeae05820d80252a603dc8e3c7eb34e32bcb137615eda3835c805845eb37b9e5 |\n| gifct-governance.html | cc2fe3e4666a9d9b6ed376047cabb3de743e5f3bbe94325a79fc7b6e2719ce26 |\n| gifct-membership.html | c4a3ff9e97fc38e829bda7116869efe27f9e99c8d6e1b7a60039620bdb7a9f3f |\n| gifct-hsdb.html | 00e76f2317df4ab6498c0dbf438b6fec0d472606d11afe23fd3676c40bd89c7d |\n| gifct-annual2025.pdf | dc22bea68d28284bb40b201da8a7e4a227f4eed7ea48eae1d6080383f4ec7e00 |\n| gifct-taxonomy2022.pdf | d4c084c9ac1b330fd72a2c607446fcdd50f0fab93631d2e09b8fef2479a13571 |\n| gifct-iac-tor2026.pdf | e77733eb7bf9fe96453108686c55a9e2708d64df7d0acc7ed6cf4db05f344af8 |\n| gifct-transparency2022.pdf | 1b7c2847247fe7388eefe3b0f70d237d6923082f22f01407d32ced2ee2bb8422 |\n| gifct-code2022.pdf | 0366c204ea1be5b547ccdd179e0c09cc8b16e6b28512aec6b739bc8c23a94863 |\n",
        "file": "research/private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-gifct.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough",
        "title": "Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy",
        "description": "Root lane closed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded comparison of the commissioned 2021 assessment, GIFCT's response and its May 2026 policy. It does not audit individual moderation outcomes.",
        "html": "<p>Root lane closed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded comparison of the commissioned 2021 assessment, GIFCT&#x27;s response and its May 2026 policy. It does not audit individual moderation outcomes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-assessment\">The assessment</h2>\n<p>[BSR&#x27;s 2021 assessment](http[local research file] was paid for by GIFCT with BSR retaining editorial control; its December 2020-May 2021 work primarily assessed future organizational risks, not member-company outcomes. Stakeholders raised risks of government pressure and large-platform policy export. The report also records that some small platforms relied on human review because they lacked automation. It recommended stronger appeals, dispute holds, external database review and transparency about downstream use. Its then-current description assigned hash removal to the contributor and content remedy primarily to each platform. These observations and recommendations cannot establish today&#x27;s implementation or a particular wrongful removal. Its governance discussion distinguished participation from voting power and recommended a later governance review; it did not itself perform a full governance audit.</p>\n<p>Read scope: PDF3-10 and start of PDF11 via reader; targeted PDF38-39, PDF41-42, PDF44-48 and PDF63-65 passages, not each whole page or the full73-page report. Web references turn1189view0, turn1191view1/3/4, turn1192view0/1/2. Ordinary original GET returned403; no original PDF retained or hash. Two screenshot attempts (PDF44/45) returned cache misses. Reader-only evidence; visual verification unperformed. No retries.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-2021-response\">The 2021 response</h2>\n<p>[GIFCT&#x27;s 20 July 2021 response](http[local research file] grouped its commitments by timeframe. It said membership criteria had already been revised, with appeals required, and identified further remedy capability as work underway. Human review before contribution, third-party review, research access and database governance changes were longer-term commitments or matters for exploration. Review of a multi-stakeholder Operating Board was proposed for two years later. A promise in this letter is not proof of completion. Root read the complete main body, reader lines75-173; retained original HTML in root-hria-captures.json.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-current-policy-and-announced-follow-through\">The current policy and announced follow-through</h2>\n<p>The [currently linked policy](http[local research file] retains a 2022 URL but explicitly states that GIFCT&#x27;s team updated it in May2026. It commits to assessment, action, tracking and annual communication, with an annex assigning those activities across technical tools, incident response, research, working groups and transparency. The annex specifies metrics and a risk register; it does not supply their measurements or a worked user-remedy record. Root read all5 extracted pages and visually inspected the page5 matrix from the retained original. Web screenshot failed; local rendering succeeded. Original65316bytes, SHAdd704b12fc0ccfaa7f2584d9419b58f74aed2cb3a707b6a16706f8e4ae109e7d.</p>\n<p>The [18 May 2026 update](http[local research file] says a five-year report against the BSR assessment was being developed. It announces that previously BSR-delivered human-rights services will move into GIFCT&#x27;s Membership Advisory Program. The statement is forward-looking; completion of that specific transition is not proved here. It also does not establish that every safeguard improved or deteriorated. Root read the full main body, lines75-101; original retained. Two scoped searches for the five-year review returned this announcement, not a completed report. This bounded failure to locate it does not prove nonpublication.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-lane-contributes\">What this lane contributes</h2>\n<p>There are identifiable safeguards to inspect and an explicit distinction between the organization and each recipient platform. The revealing test is the chain from disputed source entry to correction notification to reconsideration of the recipient&#x27;s action. Current policy text alone cannot close that chain. Governance, actual reported corrections and member discipline are separately covered by the GIFCT lane. All acquisition in this lane has stopped before the combined forest.</p>",
        "path": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/human-rights-followthrough.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-bsr-hria2021",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-response2021",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-policy2026",
          "w26-ver-s-gifct-hr-update2026"
        ],
        "markdown": "Root lane closed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded comparison of the commissioned 2021 assessment, GIFCT's response and its May 2026 policy. It does not audit individual moderation outcomes.\n\n## The assessment\n\nBSR's 2021 assessment (see source references) was paid for by GIFCT with BSR retaining editorial control; its December 2020-May 2021 work primarily assessed future organizational risks, not member-company outcomes. Stakeholders raised risks of government pressure and large-platform policy export. The report also records that some small platforms relied on human review because they lacked automation. It recommended stronger appeals, dispute holds, external database review and transparency about downstream use. Its then-current description assigned hash removal to the contributor and content remedy primarily to each platform. These observations and recommendations cannot establish today's implementation or a particular wrongful removal. Its governance discussion distinguished participation from voting power and recommended a later governance review; it did not itself perform a full governance audit.\n\nRead scope: PDF3-10 and start of PDF11 via reader; targeted PDF38-39, PDF41-42, PDF44-48 and PDF63-65 passages, not each whole page or the full73-page report. Web references turn1189view0, turn1191view1/3/4, turn1192view0/1/2. Ordinary original GET returned403; no original PDF retained or hash. Two screenshot attempts (PDF44/45) returned cache misses. Reader-only evidence; visual verification unperformed. No retries.\n\n## The 2021 response\n\nGIFCT's 20 July 2021 response (see source references) grouped its commitments by timeframe. It said membership criteria had already been revised, with appeals required, and identified further remedy capability as work underway. Human review before contribution, third-party review, research access and database governance changes were longer-term commitments or matters for exploration. Review of a multi-stakeholder Operating Board was proposed for two years later. A promise in this letter is not proof of completion. Root read the complete main body, reader lines75-173; retained original HTML in root-hria-captures.json.\n\n## The current policy and announced follow-through\n\nThe currently linked policy (see source references) retains a 2022 URL but explicitly states that GIFCT's team updated it in May2026. It commits to assessment, action, tracking and annual communication, with an annex assigning those activities across technical tools, incident response, research, working groups and transparency. The annex specifies metrics and a risk register; it does not supply their measurements or a worked user-remedy record. Root read all5 extracted pages and visually inspected the page5 matrix from the retained original. Web screenshot failed; local rendering succeeded. Original65316bytes, SHAdd704b12fc0ccfaa7f2584d9419b58f74aed2cb3a707b6a16706f8e4ae109e7d.\n\nThe 18 May 2026 update (see source references) says a five-year report against the BSR assessment was being developed. It announces that previously BSR-delivered human-rights services will move into GIFCT's Membership Advisory Program. The statement is forward-looking; completion of that specific transition is not proved here. It also does not establish that every safeguard improved or deteriorated. Root read the full main body, lines75-101; original retained. Two scoped searches for the five-year review returned this announcement, not a completed report. This bounded failure to locate it does not prove nonpublication.\n\n## What this lane contributes\n\nThere are identifiable safeguards to inspect and an explicit distinction between the organization and each recipient platform. The revealing test is the chain from disputed source entry to correction notification to reconsideration of the recipient's action. Current policy text alone cannot close that chain. Governance, actual reported corrections and member discipline are separately covered by the GIFCT lane. All acquisition in this lane has stopped before the combined forest.\n",
        "file": "research/private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-human-rights-followthrough.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat",
        "title": "Tech Against Terrorism: the verifier, its legal controller and its operating rules",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition complete. No harmful-content database was accessed, no underlying propaganda was downloaded, and no registration, outreach or payment was made. GIFCT's own rules and the comparative rights/evaluation literature are separate lanes.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition complete. No harmful-content database was accessed, no underlying propaganda was downloaded, and no registration, outreach or payment was made. GIFCT&#x27;s own rules and the comparative rights/evaluation literature are separate lanes.</p>\n<p>The strongest new relationship is concrete corporate and financial dependence: <strong>Tech Against Terrorism (TAT) is implemented by Online Harms Foundation (OHF); OHF&#x27;s filed controlling entity is QuantSpark Limited; OHF also reports receiving loans from, being invoiced by, and owing money to QuantSpark.</strong> A separate official Canadian award directly funds development of the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform (TCAP). Neither record gives a donor a demonstrated right to order an individual content classification.</p>\n<h2 id=\"why-this-actor-belongs-in-the-case\">Why this actor belongs in the case</h2>\n<p>The Australian DIS Standard2024 section6 definition of known pro-terror material, Note2, names TAT and GIFCT as examples of independent counterterrorism-expert organisations whose tools may be used to verify material. This supplies the observed legal connection. It is not a requirement to buy from TAT, a finding about every TCAP record, or incorporation of the entirety of TCAP&#x27;s evolving taxonomy into Australian law. Retained ../esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09/legal-dis-standard.pdf, PDF13/printed9, text independently reread in this pass; original SHA256 afe30304b7094509de84a1845534b346a48c4fc2f2f07e163fd47fd040ce487d.</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-identity-and-control\">Legal identity and control</h2>\n<p>TAT&#x27;s [About page](http[local research file] Governance and Funding sections, identifies OHF as implementer and describes TAT as independent and not-for-profit. Its privacy policy also names OHF and company11656320, although the page retains a QuantSpark label in its introductory wording. The legal-identity inference is therefore tied to the company number, not just a similar name.</p>\n<p>[Companies House&#x27;s OHF overview](http[local research file] lists an active private company limited by guarantee without share capital, using the Limited exemption; incorporation2November2018; previous name QuantSpark Foundation until11May2021. This pass establishes a company, not registered-charity status. The project website&#x27;s earlier launch account is a different event from this legal entity&#x27;s incorporation.</p>\n<p>The [current PSC record](http[local research file] names <strong>QuantSpark Limited, company10304694</strong>, notified2November2018, with <strong>75% or more of voting rights and the right to appoint or remove directors</strong>. This is voting/director-appointment control in a guarantee company; it is not ownership of75% of nonexistent share capital. The public filing is a company-reported legal record, and Companies House states it does not check the accuracy of filed information. No donor voting right or instruction about a particular TCAP item is established by it.</p>\n<h2 id=\"money-with-distinct-legal-and-accounting-states\">Money with distinct legal and accounting states</h2>\n<p>OHF&#x27;s unaudited financial statements for the year ended31July2025 were approved and filed28July2026. All8 retained PDF pages were visually read. The directors elected not to file the income-and-expenditure account. Consequently, this filing does not provide total annual income or a donor-by-donor allocation against which to verify TAT&#x27;s stated balance of government and industry funding.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Relationship</th>\n<th>Exact disclosed state</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>QuantSpark → OHF consultancy</td>\n<td>FY2025 invoices <strong>GBP913,015</strong>; comparative FY2024 <strong>GBP2,160,943</strong></td>\n<td>Invoiced services, not proved cash payment or a TCAP-only expense.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OHF → QuantSpark outstanding amount</td>\n<td><strong>GBP1,554,927</strong> owed at31July2025; comparative <strong>GBP1,287,711</strong></td>\n<td>Related-party balance. The note does not disaggregate consultancy payable versus loans; do not label the entire balance a loan.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>QuantSpark → OHF finance</td>\n<td>Going-concern note says OHF relies on loans received from QuantSpark, a related party. QuantSpark&#x27;s director confirmed amounts would not be recalled in the next12months.</td>\n<td>Dated support statement, not perpetual funding, an item-level veto or evidence that all liabilities were forgiven.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Public Safety Canada → TCAP Phase2</td>\n<td>20September2022 announcement: commitment of <strong>up to CAD1.9million over three years</strong>, through the Community Resilience Fund.</td>\n<td>Project-specific commitment ceiling; not proof all money was paid.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Public Safety Canada → TCAP creation</td>\n<td>Same announcement retrospectively says approximately <strong>CAD1million was provided in June2019</strong> through the fund to create TCAP.</td>\n<td>Official reported provision, not independently obtained bank receipt or the underlying executed agreement.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Accounts source: [filed FY2025 accounts](http[local research file] retained tat-accounts-2025.pdf. PDF3/printed1 identifies unaudited small-company treatment, omitted income/expenditure statement and approval date; PDF4/printed2 note1.2 gives going-concern support; PDF7/printed5 note7 gives related-party invoices and outstanding amounts. Note7 expressly calls QuantSpark a corporate director and related party through common control and a common director. It does not identify the particular services, underlying subcontract terms or project cost centre. These financial statements also use accrual accounting, not a cash-receipts presentation.</p>\n<p>Canadian source: [Public Safety Canada20September2022 announcement](http[local research file] complete substantive news-release body read. Phase2 is described as expanding content types/platform coverage and helping develop a moderation tool for smaller companies. CAD reflects the Canadian public-programme currency context; no conversion is performed. The award names TAT, while the recipient legal-entity bridge comes from the separate TAT/Companies House records; the executed agreement naming its legal signatory was not acquired.</p>\n<p>TAT&#x27;s About page says bespoke services to technology companies generate funding and GIFCT contributes to its work. It also says funding comes equally from democratic governments and industry. This is an organisational self-description with no accounting period or reconciliation on the page, not an independently verified50:50 financial ratio. It does not establish that TCAP alerts themselves are paid, that a particular government funds a particular classification, or that the UN owns OHF.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-verified-by-whom-and-under-which-published-rules\">What is verified, by whom, and under which published rules</h2>\n<p>The public [classification-and-verification page](http[local research file] says in-house experts assess both source and content against the inclusion policy, using source-channel assessment and an intelligence assessment of likely organisational production. The <strong>full policy requires a form supplying name, work email, organisation and position</strong>. This is an explicit access boundary. The form was not submitted, and no alternate access path was attempted.</p>\n<p>The [tiered inclusion policy](http[local research file] is version-sensitive: it announces a July2023 expansion. It separates threat-to-life, crisis, designation and promotional tiers, with law-enforcement alerting confined to threat-to-life and live crisis content. Promotional content goes beyond officially produced material. A fifth tier for material not necessarily illegal remains labelled forthcoming on the page read; that is not proof it is operational now. Its references to an Oversight Board describe a safeguard prospectively, without a charter, appointment or adjudication record in this source. Footer2026 does not establish a2026 policy revision.</p>\n<p>[Tier3&#x27;s designation policy](http[local research file] follows selected UN/EU and national designation authorities, then applies TAT&#x27;s consensus and offline/online threat assessments. It permits an expert assessment of splinter-group continuity when a designation effort fails, and includes supporter-produced material using official branding under an imitation rule. Thus the published process contains private judgement as well as legal-list inputs. The stated entity review interval is six months. Removal from all followed lists triggers removal from the inclusion policy; a major governmental-status change can also justify delisting. <strong>Historical material predating delisting continues to be alerted.</strong> This is an entity-level policy, not a demonstrated correction rule for a falsely labelled item. The displayed designation matrices were not visually audited and are not adopted here as current legal lists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"provider-choice-and-an-actual-reported-correction\">Provider choice and an actual reported correction</h2>\n<p>The [Year2 transparency report](http[local research file] covering December2021–November2022, describes human verification followed by automated alerts. Platforms retain exclusive moderation discretion and can decline further notifications. Registered companies can dispute classification; TAT says it responds within seven working days. It reports36 disputes, <strong>all concerning automated online/offline-status errors</strong>:35 URL statuses were manually changed and one remained active. These are not36 terrorist-label reversals. An Academic Advisory Board was still being established at report-writing. Locators: PDF28–33, especially29–32;31–32 visually checked.</p>\n<p>The same report records18,995 submitted URLs,10,174 alerts to57 companies and82% subsequently offline (PDF5). Its monitor checks URL availability (PDF29). This is TAT&#x27;s reported operational observation, not independently demonstrated causation, a measure of adjudicated illegality or proof that each disappearance was a provider removal caused by the alert.</p>\n<p>The [legacy FAQ](http[local research file] describes vetted company, academic and civil-society access, free smaller-platform/academic use and no content downloading. It excludes government database access, while allowing threat-to-life escalation to police. However, its future references to2021/2022 development make it unsuitable as sole evidence of current access rights. Database access, receipt of an emergency alert and financial sponsorship remain different relationships.</p>\n<p>The [current TAT product page](http[local research file] describes human analysts, automated email alerts and ongoing URL-status monitoring. Its marketing language about automated removal does not establish an independent power to delete another provider&#x27;s content or override the narrower workflow evidence. No live service, API or customer configuration was inspected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"limits-and-concrete-next-records\">Limits and concrete next records</h2>\n<p>The evidence establishes corporate voting/appointment control, related-party financial reliance, a project-specific government commitment, private classification judgement and an operating provider-dispute process. It does not establish donor-to-item commands, paid inclusion incentives or proven arbitrary classification. Nor does the presence of appeals language demonstrate independent, implemented adjudication.</p>\n<p>The decisive missing records are: OHF–QuantSpark consultancy and loan agreements plus project allocation ledgers; the executed Canadian contribution agreements and disbursement reports; the current TCAP verification policy and oversight charter/appointment decisions; a redacted item-classification appeal and its downstream correction notices, including hash withdrawal, recipient notification and provider reconsideration. OHF/QuantSpark hold the first family, Public Safety Canada and the grant recipient the second, and TAT plus participating providers the third. The filed balance cannot supply those terms. No further pursuit of these records starts before the root&#x27;s forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"capture-and-reading-scope\">Capture and reading scope</h2>\n<p>All captures belong to this wave; tat-captures.json retains exactURLs, acquisition timestamps, byte sizes and SHA256. Website/company captures are original response HTML, not screenshots or reconstructions. The Companies House web-reader account link failed on a redirected cached URL; one ordinary public GET of the official filing link succeeded. Page2&#x27;s web reader likewise missed cache; ordinary GET succeeded. These were transport/reader failures, not bypassed account gates.</p>\n<p>Core original hashes: accounts2025 <strong>134815173e7eec20b1be9171b23da097d0db5b3eb9d5ffa7fe71e5b0c8c38ab9</strong>; PSC HTML <strong>3ff455a4ac892cd12666f06583e52d9a7a5cc9e7c61075fa4055eeaeffbc5147</strong>; Canada announcement <strong>4f830f539c2839ae245a4c04e29f2b8a41f072f58e2feee0a6b27faea4cfb619</strong>; Year2report <strong>8e41db80e8a9619aa5fccf252b7a831508e34c82c02c924f58c68e79ee5c8d40</strong>. Other hashes are in the manifest.</p>\n<p>Read scope: Companies House overview/PSC records complete substantive sections; filing-history entries identifying latest accounts/incorporation only. About page Governance/Funding and identity passages; privacy-page identity passage in indexed-primary excerpt only. Canada2022 announcement complete substantive body. FAQ substantive questions, with explicit legacy-date caveat. Inclusion policy substantive body; designation policy narrative criteria, imitation, splinter and delisting sections, excluding matrix accuracy. Verification public summary and form boundary only. Current TCAP product-page narrative. Accounts2025 all8pages visually inspected; its embedded text layer was empty. Year2report text PDF5–6,17,28–33; visual31–32 only; remaining40-page contents unreviewed. The incorporation bundle was captured as a58-page original but is image-only and <strong>not substantively read</strong>; no articles-of-association claim relies on it. Original capture does not imply content knowledge.</p>\n<p>No private database or underlying extremist media was accessed, copied or tested. This packet is frozen at the funding/control-to-verification breakpoint for the combined forest.</p>",
        "path": "private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-about",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-company",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-control",
          "w26-ver-s-ohf-accounts2025",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-verification",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-inclusion",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-designation",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-report2022",
          "w26-ver-s-dis-verifier-examples"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition complete. No harmful-content database was accessed, no underlying propaganda was downloaded, and no registration, outreach or payment was made. GIFCT's own rules and the comparative rights/evaluation literature are separate lanes.\n\nThe strongest new relationship is concrete corporate and financial dependence: **Tech Against Terrorism (TAT) is implemented by Online Harms Foundation (OHF); OHF's filed controlling entity is QuantSpark Limited; OHF also reports receiving loans from, being invoiced by, and owing money to QuantSpark.** A separate official Canadian award directly funds development of the Terrorist Content Analytics Platform (TCAP). Neither record gives a donor a demonstrated right to order an individual content classification.\n\n## Why this actor belongs in the case\n\nThe Australian DIS Standard2024 section6 definition of known pro-terror material, Note2, names TAT and GIFCT as examples of independent counterterrorism-expert organisations whose tools may be used to verify material. This supplies the observed legal connection. It is not a requirement to buy from TAT, a finding about every TCAP record, or incorporation of the entirety of TCAP's evolving taxonomy into Australian law. Retained ../esafety-service-wave-2026-09-09/legal-dis-standard.pdf, PDF13/printed9, text independently reread in this pass; original SHA256 afe30304b7094509de84a1845534b346a48c4fc2f2f07e163fd47fd040ce487d.\n\n## Legal identity and control\n\nTAT's About page (see source references) Governance and Funding sections, identifies OHF as implementer and describes TAT as independent and not-for-profit. Its privacy policy also names OHF and company11656320, although the page retains a QuantSpark label in its introductory wording. The legal-identity inference is therefore tied to the company number, not just a similar name.\n\nCompanies House's OHF overview (see source references) lists an active private company limited by guarantee without share capital, using the Limited exemption; incorporation2November2018; previous name QuantSpark Foundation until11May2021. This pass establishes a company, not registered-charity status. The project website's earlier launch account is a different event from this legal entity's incorporation.\n\nThe current PSC record (see source references) names **QuantSpark Limited, company10304694**, notified2November2018, with **75% or more of voting rights and the right to appoint or remove directors**. This is voting/director-appointment control in a guarantee company; it is not ownership of75% of nonexistent share capital. The public filing is a company-reported legal record, and Companies House states it does not check the accuracy of filed information. No donor voting right or instruction about a particular TCAP item is established by it.\n\n## Money with distinct legal and accounting states\n\nOHF's unaudited financial statements for the year ended31July2025 were approved and filed28July2026. All8 retained PDF pages were visually read. The directors elected not to file the income-and-expenditure account. Consequently, this filing does not provide total annual income or a donor-by-donor allocation against which to verify TAT's stated balance of government and industry funding.\n\n| Relationship | Exact disclosed state | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| QuantSpark → OHF consultancy | FY2025 invoices **GBP913,015**; comparative FY2024 **GBP2,160,943** | Invoiced services, not proved cash payment or a TCAP-only expense. |\n| OHF → QuantSpark outstanding amount | **GBP1,554,927** owed at31July2025; comparative **GBP1,287,711** | Related-party balance. The note does not disaggregate consultancy payable versus loans; do not label the entire balance a loan. |\n| QuantSpark → OHF finance | Going-concern note says OHF relies on loans received from QuantSpark, a related party. QuantSpark's director confirmed amounts would not be recalled in the next12months. | Dated support statement, not perpetual funding, an item-level veto or evidence that all liabilities were forgiven. |\n| Public Safety Canada → TCAP Phase2 | 20September2022 announcement: commitment of **up to CAD1.9million over three years**, through the Community Resilience Fund. | Project-specific commitment ceiling; not proof all money was paid. |\n| Public Safety Canada → TCAP creation | Same announcement retrospectively says approximately **CAD1million was provided in June2019** through the fund to create TCAP. | Official reported provision, not independently obtained bank receipt or the underlying executed agreement. |\n\nAccounts source: filed FY2025 accounts (see source references) retained tat-accounts-2025.pdf. PDF3/printed1 identifies unaudited small-company treatment, omitted income/expenditure statement and approval date; PDF4/printed2 note1.2 gives going-concern support; PDF7/printed5 note7 gives related-party invoices and outstanding amounts. Note7 expressly calls QuantSpark a corporate director and related party through common control and a common director. It does not identify the particular services, underlying subcontract terms or project cost centre. These financial statements also use accrual accounting, not a cash-receipts presentation.\n\nCanadian source: Public Safety Canada20September2022 announcement (see source references) complete substantive news-release body read. Phase2 is described as expanding content types/platform coverage and helping develop a moderation tool for smaller companies. CAD reflects the Canadian public-programme currency context; no conversion is performed. The award names TAT, while the recipient legal-entity bridge comes from the separate TAT/Companies House records; the executed agreement naming its legal signatory was not acquired.\n\nTAT's About page says bespoke services to technology companies generate funding and GIFCT contributes to its work. It also says funding comes equally from democratic governments and industry. This is an organisational self-description with no accounting period or reconciliation on the page, not an independently verified50:50 financial ratio. It does not establish that TCAP alerts themselves are paid, that a particular government funds a particular classification, or that the UN owns OHF.\n\n## What is verified, by whom, and under which published rules\n\nThe public classification-and-verification page (see source references) says in-house experts assess both source and content against the inclusion policy, using source-channel assessment and an intelligence assessment of likely organisational production. The **full policy requires a form supplying name, work email, organisation and position**. This is an explicit access boundary. The form was not submitted, and no alternate access path was attempted.\n\nThe tiered inclusion policy (see source references) is version-sensitive: it announces a July2023 expansion. It separates threat-to-life, crisis, designation and promotional tiers, with law-enforcement alerting confined to threat-to-life and live crisis content. Promotional content goes beyond officially produced material. A fifth tier for material not necessarily illegal remains labelled forthcoming on the page read; that is not proof it is operational now. Its references to an Oversight Board describe a safeguard prospectively, without a charter, appointment or adjudication record in this source. Footer2026 does not establish a2026 policy revision.\n\nTier3's designation policy (see source references) follows selected UN/EU and national designation authorities, then applies TAT's consensus and offline/online threat assessments. It permits an expert assessment of splinter-group continuity when a designation effort fails, and includes supporter-produced material using official branding under an imitation rule. Thus the published process contains private judgement as well as legal-list inputs. The stated entity review interval is six months. Removal from all followed lists triggers removal from the inclusion policy; a major governmental-status change can also justify delisting. **Historical material predating delisting continues to be alerted.** This is an entity-level policy, not a demonstrated correction rule for a falsely labelled item. The displayed designation matrices were not visually audited and are not adopted here as current legal lists.\n\n## Provider choice and an actual reported correction\n\nThe Year2 transparency report (see source references) covering December2021–November2022, describes human verification followed by automated alerts. Platforms retain exclusive moderation discretion and can decline further notifications. Registered companies can dispute classification; TAT says it responds within seven working days. It reports36 disputes, **all concerning automated online/offline-status errors**:35 URL statuses were manually changed and one remained active. These are not36 terrorist-label reversals. An Academic Advisory Board was still being established at report-writing. Locators: PDF28–33, especially29–32;31–32 visually checked.\n\nThe same report records18,995 submitted URLs,10,174 alerts to57 companies and82% subsequently offline (PDF5). Its monitor checks URL availability (PDF29). This is TAT's reported operational observation, not independently demonstrated causation, a measure of adjudicated illegality or proof that each disappearance was a provider removal caused by the alert.\n\nThe legacy FAQ (see source references) describes vetted company, academic and civil-society access, free smaller-platform/academic use and no content downloading. It excludes government database access, while allowing threat-to-life escalation to police. However, its future references to2021/2022 development make it unsuitable as sole evidence of current access rights. Database access, receipt of an emergency alert and financial sponsorship remain different relationships.\n\nThe current TAT product page (see source references) describes human analysts, automated email alerts and ongoing URL-status monitoring. Its marketing language about automated removal does not establish an independent power to delete another provider's content or override the narrower workflow evidence. No live service, API or customer configuration was inspected.\n\n## Limits and concrete next records\n\nThe evidence establishes corporate voting/appointment control, related-party financial reliance, a project-specific government commitment, private classification judgement and an operating provider-dispute process. It does not establish donor-to-item commands, paid inclusion incentives or proven arbitrary classification. Nor does the presence of appeals language demonstrate independent, implemented adjudication.\n\nThe decisive missing records are: OHF–QuantSpark consultancy and loan agreements plus project allocation ledgers; the executed Canadian contribution agreements and disbursement reports; the current TCAP verification policy and oversight charter/appointment decisions; a redacted item-classification appeal and its downstream correction notices, including hash withdrawal, recipient notification and provider reconsideration. OHF/QuantSpark hold the first family, Public Safety Canada and the grant recipient the second, and TAT plus participating providers the third. The filed balance cannot supply those terms. No further pursuit of these records starts before the root's forest review.\n\n## Capture and reading scope\n\nAll captures belong to this wave; tat-captures.json retains exactURLs, acquisition timestamps, byte sizes and SHA256. Website/company captures are original response HTML, not screenshots or reconstructions. The Companies House web-reader account link failed on a redirected cached URL; one ordinary public GET of the official filing link succeeded. Page2's web reader likewise missed cache; ordinary GET succeeded. These were transport/reader failures, not bypassed account gates.\n\nCore original hashes: accounts2025 **134815173e7eec20b1be9171b23da097d0db5b3eb9d5ffa7fe71e5b0c8c38ab9**; PSC HTML **3ff455a4ac892cd12666f06583e52d9a7a5cc9e7c61075fa4055eeaeffbc5147**; Canada announcement **4f830f539c2839ae245a4c04e29f2b8a41f072f58e2feee0a6b27faea4cfb619**; Year2report **8e41db80e8a9619aa5fccf252b7a831508e34c82c02c924f58c68e79ee5c8d40**. Other hashes are in the manifest.\n\nRead scope: Companies House overview/PSC records complete substantive sections; filing-history entries identifying latest accounts/incorporation only. About page Governance/Funding and identity passages; privacy-page identity passage in indexed-primary excerpt only. Canada2022 announcement complete substantive body. FAQ substantive questions, with explicit legacy-date caveat. Inclusion policy substantive body; designation policy narrative criteria, imitation, splinter and delisting sections, excluding matrix accuracy. Verification public summary and form boundary only. Current TCAP product-page narrative. Accounts2025 all8pages visually inspected; its embedded text layer was empty. Year2report text PDF5–6,17,28–33; visual31–32 only; remaining40-page contents unreviewed. The incorporation bundle was captured as a58-page original but is image-only and **not substantively read**; no articles-of-association claim relies on it. Original capture does not imply content knowledge.\n\nNo private database or underlying extremist media was accessed, copied or tested. This packet is frozen at the funding/control-to-verification breakpoint for the combined forest.\n",
        "file": "research/private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards",
        "title": "Canadian TCAP contributions: named recipient, amendment and agreement scope",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded public acquisition closed. No account, outreach, paid request, harmful-content access, new case record or canonical mutation. This lane read actual proactive-disclosure record pages, not just indexed snippets. Nine original public responses and their hashes/scopes are in canadian-award-captures.json. Executed agreements and payment ",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded public acquisition closed. No account, outreach, paid request, harmful-content access, new case record or canonical mutation. This lane read actual proactive-disclosure record pages, not just indexed snippets. Nine original public responses and their hashes/scopes are retained in canadian-award-captures.json. Executed agreements and payment evidence were not acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-new-evidence\">The new evidence</h2>\n<p>The Canadian disclosures supply the recipient/project connection that the earlier announcement left indirect. They name <strong>QuantSpark Foundation</strong> for TCAP agreement <strong>21415</strong>, and <strong>Online Harms Foundation</strong> for Phase 2 agreement <strong>22841</strong>. Their fields explicitly identify these as recipient legal names. The current official data schema says that field should come from the agreement, and that agreement value means the <strong>total stated in the agreement, in CAD</strong>, not an amendment increment. These are government-published disclosure assertions about agreements, not the signed instruments themselves.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Public disclosure</th>\n<th>Named recipient and amount state</th>\n<th>Dates and project scope</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>[Original TCAP record](http[local research file] reference 214-2019-2020-Q4-0048; agreement 21415</td>\n<td>QuantSpark Foundation; <strong>CAD 1,155,622.44 agreement value</strong>; contribution, international nongovernment recipient</td>\n<td>Displayed agreement period26February 2020–30 September 2021. Purpose: knowledge development and rapid identification/removal of terrorist content, disrupting its online distribution and limiting radicalization.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Amended TCAP record](http[local research file] reference 088-2021-2022-Q3-00035; same agreement 21415</td>\n<td>QuantSpark Foundation; <strong>CAD 1,256,688.09 revised total</strong>. Additional Information explicitly says the amendment increases funding from1,155,622.44 to1,256,688.09.</td>\n<td>Amendment date <strong>22 November 2021</strong>; displayed agreement period25February 2020–31 March 2022. Same project purpose. [Amendment panel](http[local research file] displays one Current entry with that amendment date and total.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[TCAP Phase 2 record](http[local research file] reference 088-2022-2023-Q4-00199; agreement 22841</td>\n<td>Online Harms Foundation; <strong>CAD 1,945,904 agreement value</strong>; contribution, international nongovernment recipient</td>\n<td>Displayed agreement period <strong>1 April 2023–31 March 2026</strong>. Note says signed in Q4 with start in Q1 of 2023–24; exact signature date is not given. Two workstreams: archiving/classifying terrorist content and constructing a content-moderation workflow tool for technology platforms.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>All three identify <strong>Public Safety Canada</strong> and <strong>(CRF) Community Resilience Fund</strong>. Full substantive record fields were read, including expected outcomes. Those expected outcomes concern identifying emerging issues and research/programming gaps, applying relevant initiatives, best practices and partner preparedness; they are not measurable project-specific milestone schedules or proof of outcomes delivered.</p>\n<p>The amendment&#x27;s <strong>derived increase is CAD 101,065.65</strong>. Adding the two displayed 21415 totals would double-count the pre-amendment commitment. The start dates differ by one day—26 February in the original entry versus25February in the amended entry—and the end date changes. Preserve those source values; no signed original/amendment was acquired to resolve the one-day discrepancy. The panel is an amendment disclosure, not evidence of a third payment or award.</p>\n<h2 id=\"how-this-changes-the-earlier-announcement\">How this changes the earlier announcement</h2>\n<p>The retained [20 September 2022 Public Safety release](http[local research file] announces up toCAD 1.9million over three years to TAT for Phase 2 and retrospectively says approximatelyCAD 1million was provided in June 2019 to create TCAP. Its original was acquired and fully read in the preceding private-verification lane, not reacquired here; SHA256 4f830f539c2839ae245a4c04e29f2b8a41f072f58e2feee0a6b27faea4cfb619. Prior scope: ../private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat.md and its capture manifest.</p>\n<p>The newly acquired records add precise totals, an explicit amendment, legal-name fields, agreement identifiers and later periods. The 2022 announcement&#x27;s1.9million formulation is not exactly the1,945,904 later disclosed total. It may be announcement rounding or later agreement setting, but no acquired record explains the difference. Likewise, the 2019 statement and the 2020 agreement entry are not automatically separate funding: same project language is a strong reconciliation lead, but does not prove the timing or allocation of the reported 2019 provision. Do not add announcement figures to agreement totals or recast agreement value as paid cash.</p>\n<p><strong>Identity boundary.</strong> The accepted Companies House packet identifies company 11656320 as Online Harms Foundation, previously QuantSpark Foundation until11May 2021. This supports reading these labels as the historical names of the same company, distinct from QuantSpark Limited company 10304694. That legal-name history is retained prior primary research, not a fresh registry inspection in this lane. The November 2021 Canadian amendment continues to display the former Foundation name after the reported UK name change; this may be a legacy agreement label. It is not evidence of a second foundation, an undisclosed recipient or the Limited company itself receiving the Canadian award. No UK company number appears in the inspected Canadian records, so the registry-number crosswalk remains separately sourced.</p>\n<h2 id=\"public-funding-controls-actual-current-terms-not-invented-historical-schedules\">Public funding controls — actual current terms, not invented historical schedules</h2>\n<p>The [CRF Terms and Conditions](http[local research file] page modified <strong>25 May 2026</strong>, were read completely, sections1–15.6. They provide department-approved project budgets (§8), Steering Committee proposal/cost decisions (§12), and conditional, auditable contributions tied to milestones (§13). Contributions require financial/nonfinancial reporting and final expenditure accounting; frequency depends on risk (§15.2). Progress payments require departmental acceptance of interim financial/project reports, with risk/cash-flow-based advances possible (§15.4).</p>\n<p>Recipient copyright remains; a royalty-free, permanent, nonexclusive departmental licence <strong>may</strong> be given (§10), not automatic government ownership. Onward redistribution requires prior departmental approval, while recipients independently choose beneficiaries with minimal guidance and do not act as government agents; selection records may be reviewed (§15.6). This is approval of redistribution plus recipient selection discretion, not unconstrained pass-through or automatic control of every subcontract. No actual redistribution, licence or content-classification instruction is proved.</p>\n<p>These currently published terms show a concrete programme architecture. They do <strong>not</strong> establish which version or bespoke schedules governed 21415/22841, when a particular milestone was accepted, whether money was advanced/reimbursed, or whether a donor exercised any selection right. The precise executed agreements, incorporated terms, approved budgets, reporting schedules, amendment and acceptance/payment records remain the decisive missing documents.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-ancestry-and-finite-frontier\">Source ancestry and finite frontier</h2>\n<p>The original announcement led to a narrowly targeted search of official grants disclosures. Indexed results surfaced TCAP identifiers but their very large paginated URLs had changed contents when opened; those stale snippets were discovery only. The live filtered public search returned the exact record hrefs subsequently read and retained. A web-reader failure on the TCAP search, a403 on the dataset landing and cache miss on the Phase 2 detail were resolved by one ordinary unauthenticated GET of each public page; there was no proxy, account, authentication workaround or repeated failed route. Other acquisition GETs succeeded on first attempt.</p>\n<p>The [official dataset landing](http[local research file] links the [public schema](http[local research file] Only the agreement-value, start/end-date, amendment-date/number and recipient-legal-name definitions were read. The schema distinguishes projected end dates from completed performance. Its current guidance helps interpret displayed records but does not retroactively certify historical data quality. The million-record bulk CSV was not downloaded. No broad recipient roster was harvested.</p>\n<p>Ten targeted search queries covered TCAP/TAT/OHF in official grants records, agreement 21415/22841, the dataset, CRF reporting and programme terms. A 2019–20 departmental-results-report hit and general programme-plan snippets were discovery only; they were not acquired or added as evidence. The old and current award record bodies and amendment panel were read in full. The four-record extract is a derivative for local navigation; no original text is altered. Full metadata and SHA256 appear in the adjacent manifest.</p>\n<p><strong>Forest implication:</strong> the useful path is now Public Safety Canada→identified contribution→named foundation→specified TCAP workstreams. This does not prove Canada→QuantSpark consultancy payment, classification command, individual removal or Australian deployment. Those would require their own allocation/implementation records. The most discriminating next record is the executed 21415 amendment or 22841 agreement with its approved budget and payment/milestone annex, then a corresponding acceptance/payment record. Public Safety Canada&#x27;s CRF grants/contributions administrators and the recipient hold them. No request or follow-up branch was initiated.</p>\n<h2 id=\"original-custody\">Original custody</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Retained original</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-grants-search.html</td>\n<td>90d5434e9d8b815c60fe38710fa8f08f01b62596c474b63ffca4aeaa4c850554</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-grants-dataset.html</td>\n<td>1c1d0b427330b7dee079325124c2c828b147f2d48317c58ceb80a8705f5fcece</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-phase2-record.html</td>\n<td>bd99ed33d85637435c4436f8f9e1ccd8466f16ff8c2850f476b67650ddd65aab</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-quantspark-search.html</td>\n<td>3003297c743b611f5d3f2598d7640c19830e355947b972201bcdd1f4892dd4a4</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-phase1-original-record.html</td>\n<td>96ff7704f383ffd60d6e63d464369cc2cb0211397f2caa030bd700fbf02361ae</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-phase1-amended-record.html</td>\n<td>af134718afb4fab14bf577303bcc47d27dd73d50be594e54e21467ce64ee4a4d</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-phase1-amendments.html</td>\n<td>26ed0dfcd910e3fc7ec7683cf91d3d5438e7869600eedfb3a33ce9431d609f29</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-crf-terms-current.html</td>\n<td>67410f69545551534785721c81ff75ac07d248b0ddb3a5e6e5cbbccaac50a0c0</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>canada-grants-schema.json</td>\n<td>a9b230e6c1750dc5f555ee12464568330ae0882f606e772a64b4fcd933bf919a</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Four-record normalized extract (derivative) SHA256: 57f51a5f2a1d76cec0dd75148ff9524b3eceacc8931ad469aeb91acdc4a6292b.</p>",
        "path": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09/canadian-awards.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-original",
          "w26-ver-s-ca21415-amended",
          "w26-ver-s-ca22841",
          "w26-ver-s-crf-terms2026",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-disclosure-schema"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded public acquisition closed. No account, outreach, paid request, harmful-content access, new case record or canonical mutation. This lane read actual proactive-disclosure record pages, not just indexed snippets. Nine original public responses and their hashes/scopes are retained in canadian-award-captures.json. Executed agreements and payment evidence were not acquired.\n\n## The new evidence\n\nThe Canadian disclosures supply the recipient/project connection that the earlier announcement left indirect. They name **QuantSpark Foundation** for TCAP agreement **21415**, and **Online Harms Foundation** for Phase 2 agreement **22841**. Their fields explicitly identify these as recipient legal names. The current official data schema says that field should come from the agreement, and that agreement value means the **total stated in the agreement, in CAD**, not an amendment increment. These are government-published disclosure assertions about agreements, not the signed instruments themselves.\n\n| Public disclosure | Named recipient and amount state | Dates and project scope |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Original TCAP record (see source references) reference 214-2019-2020-Q4-0048; agreement 21415 | QuantSpark Foundation; **CAD 1,155,622.44 agreement value**; contribution, international nongovernment recipient | Displayed agreement period26February 2020–30 September 2021. Purpose: knowledge development and rapid identification/removal of terrorist content, disrupting its online distribution and limiting radicalization. |\n| Amended TCAP record (see source references) reference 088-2021-2022-Q3-00035; same agreement 21415 | QuantSpark Foundation; **CAD 1,256,688.09 revised total**. Additional Information explicitly says the amendment increases funding from1,155,622.44 to1,256,688.09. | Amendment date **22 November 2021**; displayed agreement period25February 2020–31 March 2022. Same project purpose. Amendment panel (see source references) displays one Current entry with that amendment date and total. |\n| TCAP Phase 2 record (see source references) reference 088-2022-2023-Q4-00199; agreement 22841 | Online Harms Foundation; **CAD 1,945,904 agreement value**; contribution, international nongovernment recipient | Displayed agreement period **1 April 2023–31 March 2026**. Note says signed in Q4 with start in Q1 of 2023–24; exact signature date is not given. Two workstreams: archiving/classifying terrorist content and constructing a content-moderation workflow tool for technology platforms. |\n\nAll three identify **Public Safety Canada** and **(CRF) Community Resilience Fund**. Full substantive record fields were read, including expected outcomes. Those expected outcomes concern identifying emerging issues and research/programming gaps, applying relevant initiatives, best practices and partner preparedness; they are not measurable project-specific milestone schedules or proof of outcomes delivered.\n\nThe amendment's **derived increase is CAD 101,065.65**. Adding the two displayed 21415 totals would double-count the pre-amendment commitment. The start dates differ by one day—26 February in the original entry versus25February in the amended entry—and the end date changes. Preserve those source values; no signed original/amendment was acquired to resolve the one-day discrepancy. The panel is an amendment disclosure, not evidence of a third payment or award.\n\n## How this changes the earlier announcement\n\nThe retained 20 September 2022 Public Safety release (see source references) announces up toCAD 1.9million over three years to TAT for Phase 2 and retrospectively says approximatelyCAD 1million was provided in June 2019 to create TCAP. Its original was acquired and fully read in the preceding private-verification lane, not reacquired here; SHA256 4f830f539c2839ae245a4c04e29f2b8a41f072f58e2feee0a6b27faea4cfb619. Prior scope: ../private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat.md and its capture manifest.\n\nThe newly acquired records add precise totals, an explicit amendment, legal-name fields, agreement identifiers and later periods. The 2022 announcement's1.9million formulation is not exactly the1,945,904 later disclosed total. It may be announcement rounding or later agreement setting, but no acquired record explains the difference. Likewise, the 2019 statement and the 2020 agreement entry are not automatically separate funding: same project language is a strong reconciliation lead, but does not prove the timing or allocation of the reported 2019 provision. Do not add announcement figures to agreement totals or recast agreement value as paid cash.\n\n**Identity boundary.** The accepted Companies House packet identifies company 11656320 as Online Harms Foundation, previously QuantSpark Foundation until11May 2021. This supports reading these labels as the historical names of the same company, distinct from QuantSpark Limited company 10304694. That legal-name history is retained prior primary research, not a fresh registry inspection in this lane. The November 2021 Canadian amendment continues to display the former Foundation name after the reported UK name change; this may be a legacy agreement label. It is not evidence of a second foundation, an undisclosed recipient or the Limited company itself receiving the Canadian award. No UK company number appears in the inspected Canadian records, so the registry-number crosswalk remains separately sourced.\n\n## Public funding controls — actual current terms, not invented historical schedules\n\nThe CRF Terms and Conditions (see source references) page modified **25 May 2026**, were read completely, sections1–15.6. They provide department-approved project budgets (§8), Steering Committee proposal/cost decisions (§12), and conditional, auditable contributions tied to milestones (§13). Contributions require financial/nonfinancial reporting and final expenditure accounting; frequency depends on risk (§15.2). Progress payments require departmental acceptance of interim financial/project reports, with risk/cash-flow-based advances possible (§15.4).\n\nRecipient copyright remains; a royalty-free, permanent, nonexclusive departmental licence **may** be given (§10), not automatic government ownership. Onward redistribution requires prior departmental approval, while recipients independently choose beneficiaries with minimal guidance and do not act as government agents; selection records may be reviewed (§15.6). This is approval of redistribution plus recipient selection discretion, not unconstrained pass-through or automatic control of every subcontract. No actual redistribution, licence or content-classification instruction is proved.\n\nThese currently published terms show a concrete programme architecture. They do **not** establish which version or bespoke schedules governed 21415/22841, when a particular milestone was accepted, whether money was advanced/reimbursed, or whether a donor exercised any selection right. The precise executed agreements, incorporated terms, approved budgets, reporting schedules, amendment and acceptance/payment records remain the decisive missing documents.\n\n## Source ancestry and finite frontier\n\nThe original announcement led to a narrowly targeted search of official grants disclosures. Indexed results surfaced TCAP identifiers but their very large paginated URLs had changed contents when opened; those stale snippets were discovery only. The live filtered public search returned the exact record hrefs subsequently read and retained. A web-reader failure on the TCAP search, a403 on the dataset landing and cache miss on the Phase 2 detail were resolved by one ordinary unauthenticated GET of each public page; there was no proxy, account, authentication workaround or repeated failed route. Other acquisition GETs succeeded on first attempt.\n\nThe official dataset landing (see source references) links the public schema (see source references) Only the agreement-value, start/end-date, amendment-date/number and recipient-legal-name definitions were read. The schema distinguishes projected end dates from completed performance. Its current guidance helps interpret displayed records but does not retroactively certify historical data quality. The million-record bulk CSV was not downloaded. No broad recipient roster was harvested.\n\nTen targeted search queries covered TCAP/TAT/OHF in official grants records, agreement 21415/22841, the dataset, CRF reporting and programme terms. A 2019–20 departmental-results-report hit and general programme-plan snippets were discovery only; they were not acquired or added as evidence. The old and current award record bodies and amendment panel were read in full. The four-record extract is a derivative for local navigation; no original text is altered. Full metadata and SHA256 appear in the adjacent manifest.\n\n**Forest implication:** the useful path is now Public Safety Canada→identified contribution→named foundation→specified TCAP workstreams. This does not prove Canada→QuantSpark consultancy payment, classification command, individual removal or Australian deployment. Those would require their own allocation/implementation records. The most discriminating next record is the executed 21415 amendment or 22841 agreement with its approved budget and payment/milestone annex, then a corresponding acceptance/payment record. Public Safety Canada's CRF grants/contributions administrators and the recipient hold them. No request or follow-up branch was initiated.\n\n## Original custody\n\n| Retained original | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- |\n| canada-grants-search.html | 90d5434e9d8b815c60fe38710fa8f08f01b62596c474b63ffca4aeaa4c850554 |\n| canada-grants-dataset.html | 1c1d0b427330b7dee079325124c2c828b147f2d48317c58ceb80a8705f5fcece |\n| canada-phase2-record.html | bd99ed33d85637435c4436f8f9e1ccd8466f16ff8c2850f476b67650ddd65aab |\n| canada-quantspark-search.html | 3003297c743b611f5d3f2598d7640c19830e355947b972201bcdd1f4892dd4a4 |\n| canada-phase1-original-record.html | 96ff7704f383ffd60d6e63d464369cc2cb0211397f2caa030bd700fbf02361ae |\n| canada-phase1-amended-record.html | af134718afb4fab14bf577303bcc47d27dd73d50be594e54e21467ce64ee4a4d |\n| canada-phase1-amendments.html | 26ed0dfcd910e3fc7ec7683cf91d3d5438e7869600eedfb3a33ce9431d609f29 |\n| canada-crf-terms-current.html | 67410f69545551534785721c81ff75ac07d248b0ddb3a5e6e5cbbccaac50a0c0 |\n| canada-grants-schema.json | a9b230e6c1750dc5f555ee12464568330ae0882f606e772a64b4fcd933bf919a |\n\nFour-record normalized extract (derivative) SHA256: 57f51a5f2a1d76cec0dd75148ff9524b3eceacc8931ad469aeb91acdc4a6292b.\n",
        "file": "research/quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-awards.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control",
        "title": "QuantSpark: filed control and the reciprocal OHF accounts",
        "description": "Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This is the bounded corporate lane selected after the forest review “Privately governed verification can travel farther than its correction.” No account, outreach, paid acquisition, database access or canonical case edit. Findings omit personal contact, residential, birth and family information.",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This is the bounded corporate lane selected after the forest review “Privately governed verification can travel farther than its correction.” No account, outreach, paid acquisition, database access or canonical case edit. Findings omit personal contact, residential, birth and family information.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-corporate-records-establish\">What the corporate records establish</h2>\n<p><strong>Adam Hadley is QuantSpark Limited&#x27;s sole currently listed director and its registered person with significant control.</strong> The official register lists one officer, no resignations, appointed 1 August 2016. The active PSC entry, notified the same date, states ownership of <strong>75% or more of shares</strong>, <strong>75% or more of voting rights</strong>, the right to appoint or remove directors, and significant influence or control. These are filed rights, not a precise share percentage or proof that nobody else owns shares. Companies House warns that it does not check the accuracy of filed information. Sources: [officers](http[local research file] active-role/appointment entry; [PSC](http[local research file] sole active entry and nature of control.</p>\n<p>[Company overview](http[local research file] identifies company <strong>10304694</strong>, an active private company incorporated 1 August 2016. It was formerly Congent Strategy and Analytics Limited until 10 July 2017. The latest accounts are for 31 July 2025. The accounts themselves specify a private company limited by shares (PDF5/printed3). This is a different legal entity from Online Harms Foundation, company 11656320, which is limited by guarantee without share capital.</p>\n<p>The prior retained OHF PSC record identifies QuantSpark Limited as its controller with 75%+ voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. That yields a documented corporate-control chain <strong>Hadley → QuantSpark → OHF</strong>, with different rights at each step. TAT identifies OHF as its implementer. The chain does not by itself show Hadley or QuantSpark choosing a particular TCAP entry, setting the verification taxonomy, or receiving instructions from a public donor. Reused source: [OHF PSC](http[local research file] retained <code>../private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat-psc.html</code>; current packet reread its nature-of-control passage. The earlier <code>tat.md</code> holds identity and original custody.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-suppliers-accounts-explain-part-of-the-dependence\">The supplier&#x27;s accounts explain part of the dependence</h2>\n<p>[Latest original QuantSpark accounts](http[local research file] year ended 31 July 2025, were approved by director Mr A I Hadley on <strong>9 July 2026</strong> and filed <strong>15 July 2026</strong>. The filing is unaudited and uses the small-companies regime. All 11 pages were visually read. The director elected not to file the profit-and-loss account (PDF3/printed1); the public statements therefore do not disclose annual turnover, annual profit, customer concentration or a project margin. Amounts are sterling, rounded to the nearest pound (PDF5/printed3).</p>\n<p>The decisive reciprocal evidence is <strong>note 10, PDF10/printed8</strong>, identifying OHF as connected through common control and a common director:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>QuantSpark&#x27;s disclosed relation to OHF</th>\n<th>FY/as at 31 July 2025</th>\n<th>2024 comparative</th>\n<th>Evidence state</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Consultancy and other services invoiced, net of VAT</td>\n<td>£913,095</td>\n<td>£2,160,943</td>\n<td>Invoiced service amount; not a bank receipt</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Amount owed in respect of those services at year end</td>\n<td>£1,374,157</td>\n<td>£1,234,895</td>\n<td>Outstanding receivable; not current-year revenue</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Amount owed for recharged expenses at year end</td>\n<td>£180,769</td>\n<td>£52,816</td>\n<td>Separate outstanding receivable</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sum of the two disclosed outstanding components</td>\n<td>£1,554,926</td>\n<td>£1,287,711</td>\n<td>Our arithmetic; not an additional transaction</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The retained OHF accounts, PDF7/printed5 note7, report <strong>£913,015</strong> invoiced by QuantSpark during 2025 and <strong>£1,554,927</strong> owed at year end. Its 2024 comparatives are £2,160,943 invoiced and £1,287,711 owed. The 2025 statements therefore differ by <strong>£80</strong> on the invoice amount and <strong>£1</strong> on the sum of outstanding components; the 2024 figures reconcile. Preserve each filing&#x27;s figure and description. The QS invoice figure expressly says net of VAT; the OHF sentence does not specify a VAT basis. The acquired records do not explain the small differences, and they do not warrant an allegation of misstatement or a manufactured reconciliation.</p>\n<p>This is useful clarification of OHF&#x27;s creditor dependence: the supplier describes substantial unpaid services and expenses, rather than leaving the entire balance unclassified. It does <strong>not</strong> prove that the entire balance is a cash loan. OHF&#x27;s separate going-concern note says it relies on loans from QuantSpark and records the director&#x27;s assurance that amounts would not be recalled in the following 12 months. The public reciprocal note does not supply the loan agreements, interest/security terms, repayment schedule, whether any amount is subordinated, or which balance components the assurance covers. Source reused: <code>../private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat-accounts-2025.pdf</code>, SHA256 134815173e7eec20b1be9171b23da097d0db5b3eb9d5ffa7fe71e5b0c8c38ab9; PDF7 visually reread now, PDF4 going-concern read in the preceding accepted lane.</p>\n<p>QuantSpark reports positive net assets of £3,961,806 and cash of £922,739 at 31 July 2025 (PDF3/printed1). Those company-wide balance-sheet figures do not establish the source of funds lent to OHF, available unrestricted cash for TCAP, or the profitability of the OHF relationship. The filing&#x27;s note 10 also includes an unrelated connected-company loan; that does not explain the OHF amounts and no branch into that company was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-companys-own-professional-role-statement\">The company&#x27;s own professional-role statement</h2>\n<p>QuantSpark&#x27;s [20 April 2026 article](http[local research file] describes its AI/software consultancy business and identifies <strong>Adam Hadley as CEO and founder</strong>. Its author capsule expressly says he also runs Tech Against Terrorism. This is a direct company-owned statement of shared leadership, corroborating a professional connection beyond the register; it is not an OHF management contract or a specification of his classification-approval powers.</p>\n<p>The article markets services to private-equity firms and their portfolio companies. That establishes its stated customer focus, not ownership of QuantSpark by a private-equity fund, funding of TAT by those customers, or a transfer from an unnamed asset manager. No company-owned contract-level explanation of the OHF loan/service arrangements was located in this bounded pass. A later exact-domain query repeated the leadership capsule; no wider biography or client-network expansion followed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-financial-and-decision-frontier\">Finite financial and decision frontier</h2>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the <strong>QuantSpark–OHF consultancy agreement and related-party approval record</strong>, the <strong>loan/credit agreement and any standstill confirmation</strong>, and the <strong>intercompany reconciliation/payment ledger with project codes</strong>. Custodians are the two companies and their finance advisers. Joined to actual donor agreements, those would establish rates, earmarked projects, invoice settlement, repayment conditions and any reserved approval rights. They would also resolve the small reciprocal differences. A controlling person&#x27;s registration or matching year-end balance cannot supply those facts.</p>\n<p>The strongest defensible finding is concentrated corporate control combined with a disclosed supplier-creditor relationship. A commercially useful support structure, creditor dependence, and project-specific donor conditions can coexist. Which decisions each participant actually controlled still requires the operative agreements or decision records. No public-sector award is routed into these invoices or into an individual moderation decision in this packet. UK contracts and Canadian awards are separate concurrent lanes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-and-original-custody\">Reading and original custody</h2>\n<p>Six originals were retained by ordinary unauthenticated GET; <code>qs-captures.json</code> records exact URLs, timestamps, hashes and reading scopes. The official accounts web-reader click returned an Internal Error; one ordinary GET of the filing&#x27;s direct PDF succeeded. No other retry or access workaround occurred. The scanned 11-page PDF has no usable text layer. <code>qs-accounts2025.txt</code> contains only empty page headings and is <strong>not</strong> a readable transcription. Local <code>qs-accounts-p1.png</code> through <code>p11.png</code> were all visually inspected. No earlier accounts or confirmation statement was acquired: the latest filing supplies 2024 comparatives and no material dated control change required another filing.</p>\n<p>The company overview, sole PSC entry, officer role/date and latest-account filing row were read. The complete substantive company article and author capsule were read from retained HTML; unrelated client-performance claims are not findings. The initial forest-tail output was truncated; the complete selected latest entry was then reread. Web search output is discovery only except the explicitly read company source. Original custody includes public-register fields that are deliberately excluded from this narrative.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Retained original</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>qs-company.html</td>\n<td>9090a78477705be4adb0b3b075d995a8a515a83bacf1b4621942825490de3ffb</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>qs-psc.html</td>\n<td>8b323d5c4006dbc9b859e67475eecf4013cb522edbf1e75886ea6bc21f2a62a9</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>qs-officers.html</td>\n<td>a83a9f8c0ac1d422abb49bbf190eb0103b369013a11a83d2af24794e571b936d</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>qs-filings.html</td>\n<td>5f87516df1a2c5bf78f4a611a38ff3dfca8c68d104076c6c5fbb2bc4da25953b</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>qs-company-statement.html</td>\n<td>36cf4792c960b5b3fd5450805ed34694e83d4524b640920dfa6a307198ca6edb</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>qs-accounts2025.pdf</td>\n<td>196702f52a7dfd545a60f016ecf0f48ee0bc68f568b77b18544d7f934d24bfab</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>",
        "path": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09/corporate-control.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-qs-company",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-control",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-officers",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-accounts2025",
          "w26-ver-s-qs-leadership"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed 9 September 2026. This is the bounded corporate lane selected after the forest review “Privately governed verification can travel farther than its correction.” No account, outreach, paid acquisition, database access or canonical case edit. Findings omit personal contact, residential, birth and family information.\n\n## What the corporate records establish\n\n**Adam Hadley is QuantSpark Limited's sole currently listed director and its registered person with significant control.** The official register lists one officer, no resignations, appointed 1 August 2016. The active PSC entry, notified the same date, states ownership of **75% or more of shares**, **75% or more of voting rights**, the right to appoint or remove directors, and significant influence or control. These are filed rights, not a precise share percentage or proof that nobody else owns shares. Companies House warns that it does not check the accuracy of filed information. Sources: officers (see source references) active-role/appointment entry; PSC (see source references) sole active entry and nature of control.\n\nCompany overview (see source references) identifies company **10304694**, an active private company incorporated 1 August 2016. It was formerly Congent Strategy and Analytics Limited until 10 July 2017. The latest accounts are for 31 July 2025. The accounts themselves specify a private company limited by shares (PDF5/printed3). This is a different legal entity from Online Harms Foundation, company 11656320, which is limited by guarantee without share capital.\n\nThe prior retained OHF PSC record identifies QuantSpark Limited as its controller with 75%+ voting rights and director appointment/removal rights. That yields a documented corporate-control chain **Hadley → QuantSpark → OHF**, with different rights at each step. TAT identifies OHF as its implementer. The chain does not by itself show Hadley or QuantSpark choosing a particular TCAP entry, setting the verification taxonomy, or receiving instructions from a public donor. Reused source: OHF PSC (see source references) retained `../private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat-psc.html`; current packet reread its nature-of-control passage. The earlier `tat.md` holds identity and original custody.\n\n## The supplier's accounts explain part of the dependence\n\nLatest original QuantSpark accounts (see source references) year ended 31 July 2025, were approved by director Mr A I Hadley on **9 July 2026** and filed **15 July 2026**. The filing is unaudited and uses the small-companies regime. All 11 pages were visually read. The director elected not to file the profit-and-loss account (PDF3/printed1); the public statements therefore do not disclose annual turnover, annual profit, customer concentration or a project margin. Amounts are sterling, rounded to the nearest pound (PDF5/printed3).\n\nThe decisive reciprocal evidence is **note 10, PDF10/printed8**, identifying OHF as connected through common control and a common director:\n\n| QuantSpark's disclosed relation to OHF | FY/as at 31 July 2025 | 2024 comparative | Evidence state |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Consultancy and other services invoiced, net of VAT | £913,095 | £2,160,943 | Invoiced service amount; not a bank receipt |\n| Amount owed in respect of those services at year end | £1,374,157 | £1,234,895 | Outstanding receivable; not current-year revenue |\n| Amount owed for recharged expenses at year end | £180,769 | £52,816 | Separate outstanding receivable |\n| Sum of the two disclosed outstanding components | £1,554,926 | £1,287,711 | Our arithmetic; not an additional transaction |\n\nThe retained OHF accounts, PDF7/printed5 note7, report **£913,015** invoiced by QuantSpark during 2025 and **£1,554,927** owed at year end. Its 2024 comparatives are £2,160,943 invoiced and £1,287,711 owed. The 2025 statements therefore differ by **£80** on the invoice amount and **£1** on the sum of outstanding components; the 2024 figures reconcile. Preserve each filing's figure and description. The QS invoice figure expressly says net of VAT; the OHF sentence does not specify a VAT basis. The acquired records do not explain the small differences, and they do not warrant an allegation of misstatement or a manufactured reconciliation.\n\nThis is useful clarification of OHF's creditor dependence: the supplier describes substantial unpaid services and expenses, rather than leaving the entire balance unclassified. It does **not** prove that the entire balance is a cash loan. OHF's separate going-concern note says it relies on loans from QuantSpark and records the director's assurance that amounts would not be recalled in the following 12 months. The public reciprocal note does not supply the loan agreements, interest/security terms, repayment schedule, whether any amount is subordinated, or which balance components the assurance covers. Source reused: `../private-verification-wave-2026-09-09/tat-accounts-2025.pdf`, SHA256 134815173e7eec20b1be9171b23da097d0db5b3eb9d5ffa7fe71e5b0c8c38ab9; PDF7 visually reread now, PDF4 going-concern read in the preceding accepted lane.\n\nQuantSpark reports positive net assets of £3,961,806 and cash of £922,739 at 31 July 2025 (PDF3/printed1). Those company-wide balance-sheet figures do not establish the source of funds lent to OHF, available unrestricted cash for TCAP, or the profitability of the OHF relationship. The filing's note 10 also includes an unrelated connected-company loan; that does not explain the OHF amounts and no branch into that company was opened.\n\n## The company's own professional-role statement\n\nQuantSpark's 20 April 2026 article (see source references) describes its AI/software consultancy business and identifies **Adam Hadley as CEO and founder**. Its author capsule expressly says he also runs Tech Against Terrorism. This is a direct company-owned statement of shared leadership, corroborating a professional connection beyond the register; it is not an OHF management contract or a specification of his classification-approval powers.\n\nThe article markets services to private-equity firms and their portfolio companies. That establishes its stated customer focus, not ownership of QuantSpark by a private-equity fund, funding of TAT by those customers, or a transfer from an unnamed asset manager. No company-owned contract-level explanation of the OHF loan/service arrangements was located in this bounded pass. A later exact-domain query repeated the leadership capsule; no wider biography or client-network expansion followed.\n\n## Finite financial and decision frontier\n\nThe next discriminating records are the **QuantSpark–OHF consultancy agreement and related-party approval record**, the **loan/credit agreement and any standstill confirmation**, and the **intercompany reconciliation/payment ledger with project codes**. Custodians are the two companies and their finance advisers. Joined to actual donor agreements, those would establish rates, earmarked projects, invoice settlement, repayment conditions and any reserved approval rights. They would also resolve the small reciprocal differences. A controlling person's registration or matching year-end balance cannot supply those facts.\n\nThe strongest defensible finding is concentrated corporate control combined with a disclosed supplier-creditor relationship. A commercially useful support structure, creditor dependence, and project-specific donor conditions can coexist. Which decisions each participant actually controlled still requires the operative agreements or decision records. No public-sector award is routed into these invoices or into an individual moderation decision in this packet. UK contracts and Canadian awards are separate concurrent lanes.\n\n## Reading and original custody\n\nSix originals were retained by ordinary unauthenticated GET; `qs-captures.json` records exact URLs, timestamps, hashes and reading scopes. The official accounts web-reader click returned an Internal Error; one ordinary GET of the filing's direct PDF succeeded. No other retry or access workaround occurred. The scanned 11-page PDF has no usable text layer. `qs-accounts2025.txt` contains only empty page headings and is **not** a readable transcription. Local `qs-accounts-p1.png` through `p11.png` were all visually inspected. No earlier accounts or confirmation statement was acquired: the latest filing supplies 2024 comparatives and no material dated control change required another filing.\n\nThe company overview, sole PSC entry, officer role/date and latest-account filing row were read. The complete substantive company article and author capsule were read from retained HTML; unrelated client-performance claims are not findings. The initial forest-tail output was truncated; the complete selected latest entry was then reread. Web search output is discovery only except the explicitly read company source. Original custody includes public-register fields that are deliberately excluded from this narrative.\n\n| Retained original | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- |\n| qs-company.html | 9090a78477705be4adb0b3b075d995a8a515a83bacf1b4621942825490de3ffb |\n| qs-psc.html | 8b323d5c4006dbc9b859e67475eecf4013cb522edbf1e75886ea6bc21f2a62a9 |\n| qs-officers.html | a83a9f8c0ac1d422abb49bbf190eb0103b369013a11a83d2af24794e571b936d |\n| qs-filings.html | 5f87516df1a2c5bf78f4a611a38ff3dfca8c68d104076c6c5fbb2bc4da25953b |\n| qs-company-statement.html | 36cf4792c960b5b3fd5450805ed34694e83d4524b640920dfa6a307198ca6edb |\n| qs-accounts2025.pdf | 196702f52a7dfd545a60f016ecf0f48ee0bc68f568b77b18544d7f934d24bfab |\n",
        "file": "research/quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-corporate-control.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement",
        "title": "UK procurement and policy: what can presently be joined",
        "description": "Root lane closed9September2026. Read public official notice and guidance; no tender response, account, recipient contact or underlying content access. This establishes a prospective purchase and a documented recommendation, not the accounting destination of TAT's government support.",
        "html": "<p>Root lane closed9September2026. Read public official notice and guidance; no tender response, account, recipient contact or underlying content access. This establishes a prospective purchase and a documented recommendation, not the accounting destination of TAT&#x27;s government support.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-named-prospective-home-office-purchase\">A named prospective Home Office purchase</h2>\n<p>[Sell2Wales notice SEP653567](http[local research file] published2September2026, identifies Home Office and TAT in a UK5 notice for a pilot covering discovery, analysis and bulk referral of terrorist content to technology companies. OCID ocds-h6vhtk-06efa9; supplier PPON PQQZ-1663-NWMN. The contract is explicitly pending, with estimated signature14September2026 and term14September2026–15March2027. It displays GBP192,000 excluding VAT and GBP240,000 including VAT. These displayed amounts are unreconciled here, not payment evidence. Its direct-award justification invokes prototype/development services. The conflict-of-interest document is marked unpublished; no conclusions about its contents follow.</p>\n<p>This government-hosted record has greater evidentiary value for stage than an aggregator&#x27;s Awarded label. It does not establish an executed agreement, actual delivery, the legal recipient&#x27;s company number, specific target selection rights, OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms or a project allocation. Its future dates cannot explain FY2025 invoices.</p>\n<p>Custody: complete substantive notice read via primary web reader turn1201view0 lines24-252, including pending state and future estimated dates. Original ordinary GET returned403; no original HTML/PDF bytes or hash retained. The saved uk-home-pilot-reader-scope.md is a derivative reading record, not a facsimile. No download form or unpublished attachment was pursued.</p>\n<h2 id=\"existing-policy-endorsement-has-a-different-force\">Existing policy endorsement has a different force</h2>\n<p>The [Home Office guidance dated15February2024](http[local research file] explicitly recommends TCAP and the Knowledge Sharing Platform where applicable. It encourages proportionate customer-identification checks, contractual enforcement, reporting/appeals and service-specific restrictions across infrastructure types. It also says the guidance creates no legal obligation and targets unlawful terrorism-related material. Its discussion of separate statutory/police-notice duties is not a demonstration that any particular TAT alert triggers those duties. Recommendations cover providers regardless of location, while existing laws still matter.</p>\n<p>This establishes a public endorsement and intended implementation route. It does not establish a compulsory TCAP subscription, a universal filtering requirement, actual supplier deployment or government direction of particular TCAP classifications. Advice to consider measures and legal compulsion must remain separate in the map.</p>\n<p>Custody: original HTML117756bytes SHA256 bdcfb8fd4f85590d86a0fc7f73f9df8c1b81d5f665a0f45606d1e28240576455; complete substantive body read across primary web reader and local extraction, including introduction, how-to-use qualifications, Sections1–2, next steps and definitions. Initial combined output truncated; missing introductory scope was reread separately. Statutory discussion is attributed to this dated guidance, not a fresh complete current-law opinion.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-finite-unconfirmed-purchase-lead\">A finite unconfirmed purchase lead</h2>\n<p>[The D3 procurement index](http[local research file] reports an Ofcom purchase of twelve-month TCAP access, with a GBP34,000 contract value, a3March2026 signing date and23March2026–23March2027 period. It identifies FindTender032552-2026. That original URL returned a nonretryable web-reader error and was closed; a scoped search found no alternate official Ofcom record. The actual official notice, agreement, permitted access scope and payment are unacquired. Do not convert this secondary listing into a proved government database-access right or a contradiction of the older TCAP FAQ. No database access was attempted.</p>\n<p>QuantSpark&#x27;s public Digital Marketplace listing also appeared in search. That is a supplier offer, not evidence of a buyer&#x27;s call-off or funding TAT; its detailed contract was not acquired/read in this lane. Broad policy reports and consultation responses appeared but were not opened into new branches.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-remains-revealing\">What remains revealing</h2>\n<p>The useful outstanding records are the Home Office&#x27;s eventual signed pilot agreement and performance/selection clauses, a verified Ofcom instrument defining purchased access, and an actual project-to-supplier allocation or subcontract term. A public procurement label cannot bridge these on its own. Canadian contribution disclosures and the two companies&#x27; accounts are separate lanes of this bounded run. All root acquisition has stopped for the combined forest once those lanes close.</p>",
        "path": "quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09/uk-procurement.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-uk-voluntary2024",
          "w26-ver-s-uk-pilot2026"
        ],
        "markdown": "Root lane closed9September2026. Read public official notice and guidance; no tender response, account, recipient contact or underlying content access. This establishes a prospective purchase and a documented recommendation, not the accounting destination of TAT's government support.\n\n## A named prospective Home Office purchase\n\nSell2Wales notice SEP653567 (see source references) published2September2026, identifies Home Office and TAT in a UK5 notice for a pilot covering discovery, analysis and bulk referral of terrorist content to technology companies. OCID ocds-h6vhtk-06efa9; supplier PPON PQQZ-1663-NWMN. The contract is explicitly pending, with estimated signature14September2026 and term14September2026–15March2027. It displays GBP192,000 excluding VAT and GBP240,000 including VAT. These displayed amounts are unreconciled here, not payment evidence. Its direct-award justification invokes prototype/development services. The conflict-of-interest document is marked unpublished; no conclusions about its contents follow.\n\nThis government-hosted record has greater evidentiary value for stage than an aggregator's Awarded label. It does not establish an executed agreement, actual delivery, the legal recipient's company number, specific target selection rights, OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms or a project allocation. Its future dates cannot explain FY2025 invoices.\n\nCustody: complete substantive notice read via primary web reader turn1201view0 lines24-252, including pending state and future estimated dates. Original ordinary GET returned403; no original HTML/PDF bytes or hash retained. The saved uk-home-pilot-reader-scope.md is a derivative reading record, not a facsimile. No download form or unpublished attachment was pursued.\n\n## Existing policy endorsement has a different force\n\nThe Home Office guidance dated15February2024 (see source references) explicitly recommends TCAP and the Knowledge Sharing Platform where applicable. It encourages proportionate customer-identification checks, contractual enforcement, reporting/appeals and service-specific restrictions across infrastructure types. It also says the guidance creates no legal obligation and targets unlawful terrorism-related material. Its discussion of separate statutory/police-notice duties is not a demonstration that any particular TAT alert triggers those duties. Recommendations cover providers regardless of location, while existing laws still matter.\n\nThis establishes a public endorsement and intended implementation route. It does not establish a compulsory TCAP subscription, a universal filtering requirement, actual supplier deployment or government direction of particular TCAP classifications. Advice to consider measures and legal compulsion must remain separate in the map.\n\nCustody: original HTML117756bytes SHA256 bdcfb8fd4f85590d86a0fc7f73f9df8c1b81d5f665a0f45606d1e28240576455; complete substantive body read across primary web reader and local extraction, including introduction, how-to-use qualifications, Sections1–2, next steps and definitions. Initial combined output truncated; missing introductory scope was reread separately. Statutory discussion is attributed to this dated guidance, not a fresh complete current-law opinion.\n\n## A finite unconfirmed purchase lead\n\nThe D3 procurement index (see source references) reports an Ofcom purchase of twelve-month TCAP access, with a GBP34,000 contract value, a3March2026 signing date and23March2026–23March2027 period. It identifies FindTender032552-2026. That original URL returned a nonretryable web-reader error and was closed; a scoped search found no alternate official Ofcom record. The actual official notice, agreement, permitted access scope and payment are unacquired. Do not convert this secondary listing into a proved government database-access right or a contradiction of the older TCAP FAQ. No database access was attempted.\n\nQuantSpark's public Digital Marketplace listing also appeared in search. That is a supplier offer, not evidence of a buyer's call-off or funding TAT; its detailed contract was not acquired/read in this lane. Broad policy reports and consultation responses appeared but were not opened into new branches.\n\n## What remains revealing\n\nThe useful outstanding records are the Home Office's eventual signed pilot agreement and performance/selection clauses, a verified Ofcom instrument defining purchased access, and an actual project-to-supplier allocation or subcontract term. A public procurement label cannot bridge these on its own. Canadian contribution disclosures and the two companies' accounts are separate lanes of this bounded run. All root acquisition has stopped for the combined forest once those lanes close.\n",
        "file": "research/quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09-uk-procurement.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer",
        "title": "athens support layer",
        "description": "Athens 2025 support layer — bounded follow-through Observed 9 September 2026. No canonical case edits.",
        "html": "<p>Athens 2025 support layer — bounded follow-through\nObserved 9 September 2026. No canonical case edits.</p>\n<p>The support layer now has two concrete operational links: Cooperative AI Foundation (CAIF) reports hosting the speakers&#x27; reception and contributing to the private red-lines discussion; deliberAIde publishes a named TFS testimonial about its platform helping with the event and report. Fathom is resolved to the AI-governance nonprofit at fathom.org, FEIN 93-4840479, whose own current site describes a TFS partnership on verified redlines. No inspected source assigns a 2025 Athens payment amount or grants editorial approval rights.</p>\n<p>Fathom identity and relationship. The official seventh-edition participant page names Andrew Freedman as Fathom&#x27;s Chief Strategic Officer (reader lines 149–152). The current fathom.org team page names the same person as co-founder and CEO (lines 115–120); its footer supplies FEIN 93-4840479. Preserve those different role dates. Fathom&#x27;s current partnership entry for TFS describes “Advancing systems of verified redlines to make AI safer” (lines 96–112). This is an explicit organizational collaboration, with no visible commencement date, contract, allocation or evidence that it funded the September 2025 Call. The Athens website&#x27;s general history separately says Fathom has financially supported the Roundtable (lines 3–7); that statement covers the series and does not specify the 2025 edition. Sources: [participants](http[local research file] [Fathom team](http[local research file] [Fathom partnership](http[local research file] [Athens history](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The matching ProPublica IRS-derived index labels EIN 93-4840479 “Fathom Ai Inc” and lists one return for the fiscal year ending December 2024, filed 14 November 2025. This index is read, but the underlying return remains unread. Search discovery surfaced a $20,000 TFS/Athens grant claim with conflicting year labels across secondary sites. Do not import that amount as a verified grant or assign it to Athens 2025. The tax period, filing date and event date must be resolved from the original Schedule I. [Index and original-document links](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>CAIF contribution. Its own event recap says it hosted a reception for the speakers at the House of Lords the previous evening. With the independently established 4 December 2025 event date, 3 December is an inferred reception date. In the private “Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks” dialogue, CAIF reports arguing that red-line monitoring needs to assess interactions among agents as well as individual models. This provides an attributed policy contribution, without evidence that participants accepted it. The article names David Norman and Lewis Hammond. Its displayed date is 9 December 2025; the homepage index says 19 December. Preserve that publication-date discrepancy. [CAIF recap, opening paragraph, private-dialogue passage and byline](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>CAIF identity and funding/governance. Its footer identifies charity 1201294 and company 13485176. Companies House independently identifies COOPERATIVE AI FOUNDATION, incorporated 30 June 2021, as a company limited by guarantee without share capital. CAIF&#x27;s undated foundation page describes a $15 million philanthropic commitment from Macroscopic Ventures; this is a commitment to CAIF, without payment dates or an Athens allocation. The same page lists trustee Jesse Clifton as a Macroscopic Ventures grantmaking officer; Companies House records his director appointment effective 6 June 2025. This is a documented funder-associated governance connection, not proof of donor appointment rights or control over the event or TFS. [Company overview](http[local research file] [foundation page, introduction and trustees](http[local research file] [filing history, 18 June 2025 entry](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The public CAIF grant-summaries page was checked for Athens/TFS and returned neither name. Its text says it was last updated 20 April 2026 and explicitly warns that recently approved grants or outputs may be missing. It therefore does not establish that no event grant existed. The company filing index lists 33-page accounts to 31 December 2025, filed 24 June 2026, but their document body was not retrieved in this pass. Those accounts remain the exact next potentially discriminating public record. [Grant summary, introductory scope](http[local research file] [accounts filing](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>deliberAIde is resolved at brand/product level to deliberaide.com. Its homepage publishes a testimonial attributed to Niki Iliadis, Director, Global AI Governance, TFS, explicitly concerning Athens 2025. It reports that the platform helped the team concentrate on stakeholder engagement and deliver the event report faster. This supports reported platform use in the event workflow, not a cash contribution, donated license, exclusive processing role, or authority to decide the final report. The provider&#x27;s current general description leaves review, approval and publication with humans; that is a product claim, not an inspected Athens contract. The exact legal operator remains unresolved because the linked Impressum was unreadable and the browser substitute was refused. [Homepage, testimonial lines 27–35 and human-control description lines 259–268](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Candidate directional relations for root: Fathom → TFS, publicly described verified-redlines partnership, date unknown/current observation; Fathom → Athens series, organizer-reported financial support, date and amount unknown; CAIF → Athens 2025 speakers, hosted reception, reported; CAIF → Athens private red-lines dialogue, advocated multi-agent monitoring, reported contribution with acceptance unknown; Macroscopic Ventures → CAIF, philanthropic commitment, USD 15,000,000, organizational rather than event allocation; Jesse Clifton → CAIF, director from 6 June 2025, with separately attributed funder role; deliberAIde platform → Athens 2025 workflow, use reported in an attributed client testimonial. Do not turn reception venue into parliamentary endorsement, a software workflow into editorial control, or organizational backing into a campaign-restricted grant.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival remains ordinary sponsorship, convening and service provision by organizations with aligned interests. It fits all inspected records. The next discriminating records are the 2025 CAIF accounts and event-support agreement, original Fathom Schedule I with tax-period/recipient/purpose, the deliberAIde legal notice after the administrative access issue is resolved, and an event-specific contract or processing/report-approval record. No outreach is authorized or needed for this bounded closure.</p>\n<p>Source custody and access boundaries</p>\n<p>Successful ordinary GET hashes below identify returned bytes; raw HTML was read in memory and is not separately retained as an original artifact. Other cited records were read through the web tool with the exact scopes above. Search-only $20,000 claims remain discovered and excluded from accepted financial edges.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record</th>\n<th>State and scope</th>\n<th>SHA-256 of GET body</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>fathom.org/partnerships</td>\n<td>Read; TFS entry and nonprofit footer</td>\n<td>55336b68d8168a612fcd86eaa3fae8343fa9671e386db0ea86830c3020070d38</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ProPublica EIN 934840479 index</td>\n<td>Read; identity, tax period, filing date and document links; original not read</td>\n<td>afb402134024741f5be4eadc2431ac62f36bfa4a448ea8d43bf9edaea20fc259</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Companies House 13485176 overview</td>\n<td>Read; identity, incorporation, accounts period</td>\n<td>2f00fda43a7484b3c4aa165d26d6508d4a5ffd69e3e6d571192ef669d4627d42</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CAIF grant-summaries</td>\n<td>Inspected; introductory scope and full-page name search, not a grant-by-grant audit</td>\n<td>1e5f7d3db6bf3184fc16ee3633b8701cd2650d1c483934941eb23e33fe0b881e</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>deliberAIde Impressum</td>\n<td>Inaccessible substantive text; HTTP 200 returned only title/skip-link shell</td>\n<td>1baf97e64cd726d26ee97b3828a614b448c3629908619703d26f012997222cff</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The ProPublica original XML link (object_id=202533189349302983) returned HTTP 403. The one alternate original PDF link was refused by web__run.open with “not safe to open (non-retryable error)”; no further attempt was made. The CAIF accounts link in the official filing history failed in web__run.click because its redirected document URL could not be opened; the body remains inaccessible. Filing-history descriptions are not treated as having read the accounts.</p>\n<p>Exact deliberAIde administrative refusal, retained at root&#x27;s request. Tool: mcp__cua_repl.js. Action: cua.createBrowserTab(athensLegalBrowser.browserId, &quot;http[local research file] { sessionName: &quot;🔎 Athens support&quot; }). Returned text:</p>\n<p>“Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.”</p>\n<p>This is a browser administrative-policy refusal, not an automatic sandbox approval-review rejection. No further deliberAIde access or indirect workaround was attempted. Earlier homepage observations are retained with their original scope.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/athens-support-layer.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-fathom",
          "w8-follow-s-fathom-about",
          "w8-follow-s-athens-participants",
          "w8-follow-s-athens-history",
          "w8-follow-s-caif-event",
          "w8-follow-s-caif-foundation",
          "w8-follow-s-caif-filings",
          "w8-follow-s-deliberaide"
        ],
        "markdown": "Athens 2025 support layer — bounded follow-through\nObserved 9 September 2026. No canonical case edits.\n\nThe support layer now has two concrete operational links: Cooperative AI Foundation (CAIF) reports hosting the speakers' reception and contributing to the private red-lines discussion; deliberAIde publishes a named TFS testimonial about its platform helping with the event and report. Fathom is resolved to the AI-governance nonprofit at fathom.org, FEIN 93-4840479, whose own current site describes a TFS partnership on verified redlines. No inspected source assigns a 2025 Athens payment amount or grants editorial approval rights.\n\nFathom identity and relationship. The official seventh-edition participant page names Andrew Freedman as Fathom's Chief Strategic Officer (reader lines 149–152). The current fathom.org team page names the same person as co-founder and CEO (lines 115–120); its footer supplies FEIN 93-4840479. Preserve those different role dates. Fathom's current partnership entry for TFS describes “Advancing systems of verified redlines to make AI safer” (lines 96–112). This is an explicit organizational collaboration, with no visible commencement date, contract, allocation or evidence that it funded the September 2025 Call. The Athens website's general history separately says Fathom has financially supported the Roundtable (lines 3–7); that statement covers the series and does not specify the 2025 edition. Sources: participants (see source references) Fathom team (see source references) Fathom partnership (see source references) Athens history (see source references)\n\nThe matching ProPublica IRS-derived index labels EIN 93-4840479 “Fathom Ai Inc” and lists one return for the fiscal year ending December 2024, filed 14 November 2025. This index is read, but the underlying return remains unread. Search discovery surfaced a $20,000 TFS/Athens grant claim with conflicting year labels across secondary sites. Do not import that amount as a verified grant or assign it to Athens 2025. The tax period, filing date and event date must be resolved from the original Schedule I. Index and original-document links (see source references)\n\nCAIF contribution. Its own event recap says it hosted a reception for the speakers at the House of Lords the previous evening. With the independently established 4 December 2025 event date, 3 December is an inferred reception date. In the private “Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks” dialogue, CAIF reports arguing that red-line monitoring needs to assess interactions among agents as well as individual models. This provides an attributed policy contribution, without evidence that participants accepted it. The article names David Norman and Lewis Hammond. Its displayed date is 9 December 2025; the homepage index says 19 December. Preserve that publication-date discrepancy. CAIF recap, opening paragraph, private-dialogue passage and byline (see source references)\n\nCAIF identity and funding/governance. Its footer identifies charity 1201294 and company 13485176. Companies House independently identifies COOPERATIVE AI FOUNDATION, incorporated 30 June 2021, as a company limited by guarantee without share capital. CAIF's undated foundation page describes a $15 million philanthropic commitment from Macroscopic Ventures; this is a commitment to CAIF, without payment dates or an Athens allocation. The same page lists trustee Jesse Clifton as a Macroscopic Ventures grantmaking officer; Companies House records his director appointment effective 6 June 2025. This is a documented funder-associated governance connection, not proof of donor appointment rights or control over the event or TFS. Company overview (see source references) foundation page, introduction and trustees (see source references) filing history, 18 June 2025 entry (see source references)\n\nThe public CAIF grant-summaries page was checked for Athens/TFS and returned neither name. Its text says it was last updated 20 April 2026 and explicitly warns that recently approved grants or outputs may be missing. It therefore does not establish that no event grant existed. The company filing index lists 33-page accounts to 31 December 2025, filed 24 June 2026, but their document body was not retrieved in this pass. Those accounts remain the exact next potentially discriminating public record. Grant summary, introductory scope (see source references) accounts filing (see source references)\n\ndeliberAIde is resolved at brand/product level to deliberaide.com. Its homepage publishes a testimonial attributed to Niki Iliadis, Director, Global AI Governance, TFS, explicitly concerning Athens 2025. It reports that the platform helped the team concentrate on stakeholder engagement and deliver the event report faster. This supports reported platform use in the event workflow, not a cash contribution, donated license, exclusive processing role, or authority to decide the final report. The provider's current general description leaves review, approval and publication with humans; that is a product claim, not an inspected Athens contract. The exact legal operator remains unresolved because the linked Impressum was unreadable and the browser substitute was refused. Homepage, testimonial lines 27–35 and human-control description lines 259–268 (see source references)\n\nCandidate directional relations for root: Fathom → TFS, publicly described verified-redlines partnership, date unknown/current observation; Fathom → Athens series, organizer-reported financial support, date and amount unknown; CAIF → Athens 2025 speakers, hosted reception, reported; CAIF → Athens private red-lines dialogue, advocated multi-agent monitoring, reported contribution with acceptance unknown; Macroscopic Ventures → CAIF, philanthropic commitment, USD 15,000,000, organizational rather than event allocation; Jesse Clifton → CAIF, director from 6 June 2025, with separately attributed funder role; deliberAIde platform → Athens 2025 workflow, use reported in an attributed client testimonial. Do not turn reception venue into parliamentary endorsement, a software workflow into editorial control, or organizational backing into a campaign-restricted grant.\n\nThe strongest rival remains ordinary sponsorship, convening and service provision by organizations with aligned interests. It fits all inspected records. The next discriminating records are the 2025 CAIF accounts and event-support agreement, original Fathom Schedule I with tax-period/recipient/purpose, the deliberAIde legal notice after the administrative access issue is resolved, and an event-specific contract or processing/report-approval record. No outreach is authorized or needed for this bounded closure.\n\nSource custody and access boundaries\n\nSuccessful ordinary GET hashes below identify returned bytes; raw HTML was read in memory and is not separately retained as an original artifact. Other cited records were read through the web tool with the exact scopes above. Search-only $20,000 claims remain discovered and excluded from accepted financial edges.\n\n| Record | State and scope | SHA-256 of GET body |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| fathom.org/partnerships | Read; TFS entry and nonprofit footer | 55336b68d8168a612fcd86eaa3fae8343fa9671e386db0ea86830c3020070d38 |\n| ProPublica EIN 934840479 index | Read; identity, tax period, filing date and document links; original not read | afb402134024741f5be4eadc2431ac62f36bfa4a448ea8d43bf9edaea20fc259 |\n| Companies House 13485176 overview | Read; identity, incorporation, accounts period | 2f00fda43a7484b3c4aa165d26d6508d4a5ffd69e3e6d571192ef669d4627d42 |\n| CAIF grant-summaries | Inspected; introductory scope and full-page name search, not a grant-by-grant audit | 1e5f7d3db6bf3184fc16ee3633b8701cd2650d1c483934941eb23e33fe0b881e |\n| deliberAIde Impressum | Inaccessible substantive text; HTTP 200 returned only title/skip-link shell | 1baf97e64cd726d26ee97b3828a614b448c3629908619703d26f012997222cff |\n\nThe ProPublica original XML link (object_id=202533189349302983) returned HTTP 403. The one alternate original PDF link was refused by web__run.open with “not safe to open (non-retryable error)”; no further attempt was made. The CAIF accounts link in the official filing history failed in web__run.click because its redirected document URL could not be opened; the body remains inaccessible. Filing-history descriptions are not treated as having read the accounts.\n\nExact deliberAIde administrative refusal, retained at root's request. Tool: mcp__cua_repl.js. Action: cua.createBrowserTab(athensLegalBrowser.browserId, \"http[local research file] { sessionName: \"🔎 Athens support\" }). Returned text:\n\n“Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.”\n\nThis is a browser administrative-policy refusal, not an automatic sandbox approval-review rejection. No further deliberAIde access or indirect workaround was attempted. Earlier homepage observations are retained with their original scope.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-athens-support-layer.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation",
        "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: formation and agenda pathway",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source return; no canonical edits, outreach, payments or account actions. The revealing record is the campaign's own acknowledgements: it attributes drafting, text feedback, management and announcement brokerage to named people. These establish work performed, not final approval rights, donor control or government a",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source return; no canonical edits, outreach, payments or account actions. The revealing record is the campaign&#x27;s own acknowledgements: it attributes drafting, text feedback, management and announcement brokerage to named people. These establish work performed, not final approval rights, donor control or government adoption.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s1-specific-formation-roles\">S1 — Specific formation roles</h2>\n<p>Source: [campaign acknowledgements](http[local research file] undated; complete substantive page read, reader lines 2–24. Retrospective organizer attribution, access_state <code>read</code>. The February and July references have no year; interpreting them as 2025 follows the dated launch, rather than an explicit year here. Short extract: “drafted the first versions of the call in February”.</p>\n<p>Candidate directional edges from this source:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Actor</th>\n<th>Supported action → object</th>\n<th>Locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Charbel-Raphael Segerie</td>\n<td>Researched and drafted → initial call; coordinated stakeholders until July TFS partnership</td>\n<td>Initiation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Florent Berthet; Manuel Bimich</td>\n<td>Discussed wording → statement</td>\n<td>Statement text</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI; FLI; SaferAI; Marc Rotenberg</td>\n<td>Provided feedback → statement</td>\n<td>Statement beta testing</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Arthur Grimonpont</td>\n<td>Drafted → initial FAQ; pitched → Maria Ressa</td>\n<td>FAQ; UN Announcement</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Niki Iliadis; Su Cizem; Tereza Zoumpalova</td>\n<td>Significantly revised → FAQ</td>\n<td>FAQ</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Niki Iliadis; Tereza Zoumpalova</td>\n<td>Managed → project within TFS</td>\n<td>Management</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Florent Berthet; Manuel Bimich</td>\n<td>Identified → key signatories</td>\n<td>Signatory collection</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Niki Iliadis; Anoush Tatevossian</td>\n<td>Conducted policy/CSO outreach → signatory collection</td>\n<td>Signatory collection</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Jared Perlo</td>\n<td>Suggested → Segerie&#x27;s TFS collaboration</td>\n<td>Advisors</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Anoush Rima Tatevossian</td>\n<td>Advised → UN engagement</td>\n<td>Advisors</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are attributed contribution edges, not contracts or delegated approval powers.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s2-a-concrete-choice-upstream-of-the-campaign\">S2 — A concrete choice upstream of the campaign</h2>\n<p>Source: [Ten AI Governance Priorities: Survey of 44 Civil Society Organizations](http[local research file] The Future Society, 2 April 2025. Access_state <code>read</code>; substantive methodology, results and authorship sections read, especially reader lines 79–109 and 187–190.</p>\n<p>Its methodology reports that a Paris AI Action Summit side event on 11 February 2025 generated 15 priorities from 61 participants. <strong>Renaissance Numérique and TFS consolidated those into 10 voting options</strong>, then surveyed 44 anonymous, self-identified organizational representatives on 15–25 February. Red lines ranked first at 7.25/10 under a weighted ranking method. Authors: Caroline Jeanmaire, Jessica Galissaire, Tereza Zoumpalova and Niki Iliadis. The authors explicitly limit representativeness.</p>\n<p>Candidate edges: Renaissance Numérique + TFS → consolidated voting options; respondent group → ranked the offered red-lines option highest; TFS publication → supplied a survey subsequently linked by the campaign FAQ. This establishes agenda curation and a cited justification. It does not show an unprompted population-wide consensus, identify every respondent, or establish that the survey caused the first draft. The actual 15-to-10 mapping and original questionnaire would discriminate what was merged or excluded.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s3-dated-launch-and-initial-public-framing\">S3 — Dated launch and initial public framing</h2>\n<p>Source: [22 September 2025 campaign press release](http[local research file] The current site also links the [Foreview-hosted copy](http[local research file] Access_state <code>read</code>; all three PDF pages read. These are the same release family, not two independent confirmations; original byte equality was not tested.</p>\n<p>PDF page 1 identifies CeSIA, TFS and Berkeley CHAI as co-organizers alongside 20 partners, and reports over 200 individuals and 70 organizations. Page 3 says the call was “announced this morning by Maria Ressa” at the high-level meeting marking the UN&#x27;s 80th anniversary, and schedules presentation at AI Safety Connect at UN Headquarters for 25 September. The latter is a planned event in this dated document; the announcement is an organizer-reported completed action. Neither establishes UN endorsement. The release seeks an enforced international agreement by end-2026; it does not present a negotiated treaty text.</p>\n<p>Candidate edges: CeSIA/TFS/CHAI → co-organized call; Maria Ressa → announced call on 22 September 2025; campaign → scheduled presentation at AI Safety Connect on 25 September. The government-uptake lane owns independent UN records.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s4-documented-route-into-summit-programming\">S4 — Documented route into summit programming</h2>\n<p>Source: [Athens Roundtable agenda](http[local research file] nine-page program for 4 December 2025, London. Access_state <code>read</code> for PDF pages 1–6; remaining pages only encountered as returned context. Its filename labels it V0; no assertion that this was the last issued agenda.</p>\n<p>Page 1 names TFS as organizer with OECD and UNESCO and calls the event an official pre-summit event of the 2026 AI Impact Summit. Pages 4–6 explicitly build Dialogue 1 on the Global Call and a pre-event survey; participants would be grouped using survey responses and backgrounds, then produce a roadmap for later diplomatic forums. This is a designed agenda pathway, not just shared attendance.</p>\n<p>Candidate edge: TFS-organized Athens Dialogue 1 → used call and survey to structure agenda. The [TFS outcome article dated 12 February 2026](http[local research file] reports the dialogue happened and informed its report. Its substantive body was read; the linked report PDF returned a reader error and was not read. Agenda design and organizer-reported execution remain separate evidence states.</p>\n<p>Source: [India workshop findings](http[local research file] three pages, dated 18 February 2026; all read. Page 1 names TFS and CeSIA as conveners at AI Safety Connect Day during the India AI Impact Summit, and expressly links the session to the call. Pages 2–3 record unresolved disagreements over global harmonization, standards and balancing immediate versus frontier harms. Candidate edge: TFS + CeSIA → convened call-linked summit workshop. This report does not establish that governments adopted the call or agreed a single red-line regime. The March URL folder is not treated as the event date.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s5-distinct-from-a-narrow-path\">S5 — Distinct from A Narrow Path</h2>\n<p>[A Narrow Path&#x27;s own changelog](http[local research file] substantive entries read, dates its public V1.0.0 release to <strong>2 October 2024</strong>, V1.1.0 to 19 December 2024, and V1.2.0 to 3 April 2025. Its [main page](http[local research file] and [About page](http[local research file] portions read, identify Andrea Miotti, Tolga Bilge, Dave Kasten and James Newport as authors and describe a three-phase strategy, beginning with preventing superintelligence development for 20 years. This is a different document and project; its named authorship and dated release cannot be transferred to the September 2025 call.</p>\n<p>The shared network does matter: S1 specifically credits ControlAI feedback, while the current [call and FAQ](http[local research file] read in the statement, organizer, submission and FAQ sections, seek international agreement but leave particular red lines for scientific-diplomatic definition. The FAQ expressly says it need not reflect every signatory&#x27;s views. Endorsing the call therefore does not establish endorsement of every FAQ example or of A Narrow Path&#x27;s full program.</p>\n<h2 id=\"remaining-decision-frontier\">Remaining decision frontier</h2>\n<p>The inspected site reviews signature submissions before publication, but that does not identify who selected partner organizations or who could veto wording. No founding agreement, tracked draft, editorial approval record, partner invitation criteria or decision-rights instrument was obtained. Nor was a complete version history of the call or FAQ found: S1 describes early versions, and S3 anchors public launch, but present FAQ wording must not automatically be backdated to that launch.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to a centrally controlled private-policy project remains an openly assembled coalition whose members provided different contributions without accepting a common detailed platform. The next discriminating records are precise: the February draft and revision history; the July CeSIA–TFS partnership record; the final approval record for the September statement and later FAQ; the partner-selection record; and the survey&#x27;s option-consolidation mapping. Custodians are CeSIA/TFS and their named project managers, with Renaissance Numérique for the survey. Pursue only if publicly released or newly linked; no outreach is authorized.</p>\n<p>Acquisition stops at this coherent evidence breakpoint. Public-reader source text and PDF scopes were inspected; this Markdown is the only local artifact created by this lane, so no original-file hashes or preservation claims are made. The broad Athens recap PDF also returned a reader error; neither failed PDF is represented as read. Search-result-only material, including the Manifund funding appeal, was passed to the appropriate lane and is not evidence for this return.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/campaign-formation.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-ack",
          "w8-red-s-launch",
          "w8-red-s-survey"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source return; no canonical edits, outreach, payments or account actions. The revealing record is the campaign's own acknowledgements: it attributes drafting, text feedback, management and announcement brokerage to named people. These establish work performed, not final approval rights, donor control or government adoption.\n\n## S1 — Specific formation roles\n\nSource: campaign acknowledgements (see source references) undated; complete substantive page read, reader lines 2–24. Retrospective organizer attribution, access_state `read`. The February and July references have no year; interpreting them as 2025 follows the dated launch, rather than an explicit year here. Short extract: “drafted the first versions of the call in February”.\n\nCandidate directional edges from this source:\n\n| Actor | Supported action → object | Locator |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Charbel-Raphael Segerie | Researched and drafted → initial call; coordinated stakeholders until July TFS partnership | Initiation |\n| Florent Berthet; Manuel Bimich | Discussed wording → statement | Statement text |\n| ControlAI; FLI; SaferAI; Marc Rotenberg | Provided feedback → statement | Statement beta testing |\n| Arthur Grimonpont | Drafted → initial FAQ; pitched → Maria Ressa | FAQ; UN Announcement |\n| Niki Iliadis; Su Cizem; Tereza Zoumpalova | Significantly revised → FAQ | FAQ |\n| Niki Iliadis; Tereza Zoumpalova | Managed → project within TFS | Management |\n| Florent Berthet; Manuel Bimich | Identified → key signatories | Signatory collection |\n| Niki Iliadis; Anoush Tatevossian | Conducted policy/CSO outreach → signatory collection | Signatory collection |\n| Jared Perlo | Suggested → Segerie's TFS collaboration | Advisors |\n| Anoush Rima Tatevossian | Advised → UN engagement | Advisors |\n\nThese are attributed contribution edges, not contracts or delegated approval powers.\n\n## S2 — A concrete choice upstream of the campaign\n\nSource: Ten AI Governance Priorities: Survey of 44 Civil Society Organizations (see source references) The Future Society, 2 April 2025. Access_state `read`; substantive methodology, results and authorship sections read, especially reader lines 79–109 and 187–190.\n\nIts methodology reports that a Paris AI Action Summit side event on 11 February 2025 generated 15 priorities from 61 participants. **Renaissance Numérique and TFS consolidated those into 10 voting options**, then surveyed 44 anonymous, self-identified organizational representatives on 15–25 February. Red lines ranked first at 7.25/10 under a weighted ranking method. Authors: Caroline Jeanmaire, Jessica Galissaire, Tereza Zoumpalova and Niki Iliadis. The authors explicitly limit representativeness.\n\nCandidate edges: Renaissance Numérique + TFS → consolidated voting options; respondent group → ranked the offered red-lines option highest; TFS publication → supplied a survey subsequently linked by the campaign FAQ. This establishes agenda curation and a cited justification. It does not show an unprompted population-wide consensus, identify every respondent, or establish that the survey caused the first draft. The actual 15-to-10 mapping and original questionnaire would discriminate what was merged or excluded.\n\n## S3 — Dated launch and initial public framing\n\nSource: 22 September 2025 campaign press release (see source references) The current site also links the Foreview-hosted copy (see source references) Access_state `read`; all three PDF pages read. These are the same release family, not two independent confirmations; original byte equality was not tested.\n\nPDF page 1 identifies CeSIA, TFS and Berkeley CHAI as co-organizers alongside 20 partners, and reports over 200 individuals and 70 organizations. Page 3 says the call was “announced this morning by Maria Ressa” at the high-level meeting marking the UN's 80th anniversary, and schedules presentation at AI Safety Connect at UN Headquarters for 25 September. The latter is a planned event in this dated document; the announcement is an organizer-reported completed action. Neither establishes UN endorsement. The release seeks an enforced international agreement by end-2026; it does not present a negotiated treaty text.\n\nCandidate edges: CeSIA/TFS/CHAI → co-organized call; Maria Ressa → announced call on 22 September 2025; campaign → scheduled presentation at AI Safety Connect on 25 September. The government-uptake lane owns independent UN records.\n\n## S4 — Documented route into summit programming\n\nSource: Athens Roundtable agenda (see source references) nine-page program for 4 December 2025, London. Access_state `read` for PDF pages 1–6; remaining pages only encountered as returned context. Its filename labels it V0; no assertion that this was the last issued agenda.\n\nPage 1 names TFS as organizer with OECD and UNESCO and calls the event an official pre-summit event of the 2026 AI Impact Summit. Pages 4–6 explicitly build Dialogue 1 on the Global Call and a pre-event survey; participants would be grouped using survey responses and backgrounds, then produce a roadmap for later diplomatic forums. This is a designed agenda pathway, not just shared attendance.\n\nCandidate edge: TFS-organized Athens Dialogue 1 → used call and survey to structure agenda. The TFS outcome article dated 12 February 2026 (see source references) reports the dialogue happened and informed its report. Its substantive body was read; the linked report PDF returned a reader error and was not read. Agenda design and organizer-reported execution remain separate evidence states.\n\nSource: India workshop findings (see source references) three pages, dated 18 February 2026; all read. Page 1 names TFS and CeSIA as conveners at AI Safety Connect Day during the India AI Impact Summit, and expressly links the session to the call. Pages 2–3 record unresolved disagreements over global harmonization, standards and balancing immediate versus frontier harms. Candidate edge: TFS + CeSIA → convened call-linked summit workshop. This report does not establish that governments adopted the call or agreed a single red-line regime. The March URL folder is not treated as the event date.\n\n## S5 — Distinct from A Narrow Path\n\nA Narrow Path's own changelog (see source references) substantive entries read, dates its public V1.0.0 release to **2 October 2024**, V1.1.0 to 19 December 2024, and V1.2.0 to 3 April 2025. Its main page (see source references) and About page (see source references) portions read, identify Andrea Miotti, Tolga Bilge, Dave Kasten and James Newport as authors and describe a three-phase strategy, beginning with preventing superintelligence development for 20 years. This is a different document and project; its named authorship and dated release cannot be transferred to the September 2025 call.\n\nThe shared network does matter: S1 specifically credits ControlAI feedback, while the current call and FAQ (see source references) read in the statement, organizer, submission and FAQ sections, seek international agreement but leave particular red lines for scientific-diplomatic definition. The FAQ expressly says it need not reflect every signatory's views. Endorsing the call therefore does not establish endorsement of every FAQ example or of A Narrow Path's full program.\n\n## Remaining decision frontier\n\nThe inspected site reviews signature submissions before publication, but that does not identify who selected partner organizations or who could veto wording. No founding agreement, tracked draft, editorial approval record, partner invitation criteria or decision-rights instrument was obtained. Nor was a complete version history of the call or FAQ found: S1 describes early versions, and S3 anchors public launch, but present FAQ wording must not automatically be backdated to that launch.\n\nThe strongest rival to a centrally controlled private-policy project remains an openly assembled coalition whose members provided different contributions without accepting a common detailed platform. The next discriminating records are precise: the February draft and revision history; the July CeSIA–TFS partnership record; the final approval record for the September statement and later FAQ; the partner-selection record; and the survey's option-consolidation mapping. Custodians are CeSIA/TFS and their named project managers, with Renaissance Numérique for the survey. Pursue only if publicly released or newly linked; no outreach is authorized.\n\nAcquisition stops at this coherent evidence breakpoint. Public-reader source text and PDF scopes were inspected; this Markdown is the only local artifact created by this lane, so no original-file hashes or preservation claims are made. The broad Athens recap PDF also returned a reader error; neither failed PDF is represented as read. Search-result-only material, including the Manifund funding appeal, was passed to the appropriate lane and is not evidence for this return.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-finance",
        "title": "CeSIA follow-through finance: December 2025 Longview recommendation",
        "description": "Observed 2026-09-09. One bounded follow-up pass. Only this file written; no canonical edits, outreach, submissions, account access or closed-route retries.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 2026-09-09. One bounded follow-up pass. Only this file written; no canonical edits, outreach, submissions, account access or closed-route retries.</p>\n<p><strong>Result: unresolved.</strong> No inspected later public disclosure establishes that CeSIA&#x27;s reported December 9, 2025 recommendation of $2 million over two years became an executed grant or a received payment. The legal grantor, payment schedule and restrictions remain unknown. This is a bounded search result, not evidence that payment never happened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"starting-claim-preserved\">Starting claim preserved</h2>\n<p>The earlier [CeSIA Manifund diplomatic-sprint proposal](http[local research file] final funding-history answer, reports the recommendation and expressly distinguished it from money received. The page&#x27;s creation date is December 4, 2025, earlier than the recommendation date cited in its text. The funding answer&#x27;s update date was not visible. It cannot establish the receipt position on September 9, 2026. Its separate $0 platform display also does not establish total off-platform funding. This pass did not replace that dated-state qualification with a current unpaid claim.</p>\n<h2 id=\"later-sources-actually-inspected\">Later sources actually inspected</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source, date and exact locator</th>\n<th>Observation relevant to receipt</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>[CeSIA year-end newsletter](http[local research file] December 30, 2025; introductory organizational review and “La vie du CeSIA / Appel aux dons pour soutenir notre action”</td>\n<td>Describes the call and other activities, thanks individual donors and solicits support for 2026. No matching institutional amount, legal grantor, executed agreement or receipt is disclosed in these passages. A general appeal does not demonstrate that the Longview recommendation was unfulfilled.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Garde-à-vous @Grok](http[local research file] January 8, 2026; “La vie du CeSIA”</td>\n<td>Reports selection for a three-year European Commission evaluation project with consortium partners. This is evidence of another activity, not receipt of the Longview-recommended funding. No payment value or matching grant identified.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Le Bon, la Brute et le Truand](http[local research file] March 5, 2026; French “La vie du CeSIA” section read from public RSS</td>\n<td>Reports return from New Delhi and a Red Lines workshop at UNESCO for the IASEAI annual meeting. This supports reported implementation of work contemplated in the proposal; it does not identify its financing.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[L&#x27;enfer est pavé de bonnes inventions](http[local research file] March 12, 2026; French “La vie du CeSIA” section read from public RSS</td>\n<td>Reports a Sciences Po governance roundtable and a previous-week London workshop involving lab staff and safety researchers. The inspected section names no matching grant or payment.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[The Sweet Escape](http[local research file] August 27, 2026; “Inside CeSIA”</td>\n<td>Reports educational and policy activity; no institutional receipt update. Other claims in the newsletter were not fact-checked or adopted by this finance inquiry.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[CeSIA About](http[local research file] current undated page; “They trust us”</td>\n<td>Continues to describe institutional/philanthropic support in aggregate. It does not identify the $2 million recommendation, subsequent receipt, legal grantor or campaign restriction. The currentness of the page is not a date for its underlying grants.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are primary organizer self-reports. The absence of a payment notice in them cannot resolve a private ledger entry. Reported staffing, events and output likewise cannot identify which funding source paid for them.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-newsletter-pass-covered\">What the newsletter pass covered</h2>\n<p>The ordinary public [RSS feed](http[local research file] returned HTTP200 and 1,001,547 bytes. SHA-256 of bytes inspected in memory: <code>0507e8729d65882a42087c392d6eaabcdd9e68b7ff9ab9fde4f55a3da8bd9fc7</code>. Original RSS bytes were not retained. It contained 20 entries dated November 26, 2025–August 27, 2026, including 16 entries dated 2026 (one French/English pair is not two independent reports).</p>\n<p>The article bodies supplied in the feed were programmatically screened for Longview, $2M / two-million numeric forms and same-line CeSIA/funding language; there were no matches under that screen. This is keyword-screening scope, not a claim of exhaustive manual reading. The organizational sections itemized above were read; the year-end, January 8 and August 27 pages were additionally opened through the web reader. A section-extraction pass also returned February organizational announcements, but some bilingual output was truncated and no full-archive reading is claimed. The archive web page itself was stale relative to the RSS feed, showing June as its newest visible entry; the RSS supplied the fresher date boundary.</p>\n<p>Targeted English/French searches combined CeSIA with Longview, funding, grants, financing, annual reports and the specific amount, including organizer, newsletter and funder domains. They surfaced the existing proposal, older funding acknowledgments and unrelated current projects, but no newly inspected executed-grant or payment document. This is not a comprehensive search of every possible publication or spelling.</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-grantor-a-necessary-distinction-now-directly-documented\">Legal grantor: a necessary distinction, now directly documented</h2>\n<p>Longview&#x27;s [Organizational Structure](http[local research file] opening paragraph and the two entity sections, describes Longview Philanthropy as an umbrella name for separate independent organizations: Longview Philanthropy USA Inc., U.S. EIN 93-2664730; and Longview Inc. Ltd, England and Wales company 14444004. It states that each is responsible for its own activities. Current webpage; no publication date shown. Substantive organizational description read in full; no board/personnel relations added.</p>\n<p>Neither this page nor CeSIA&#x27;s recommendation claim selects one of those entities as the $2 million legal grantor. It also remains possible that a donor advised by Longview would grant directly or through another intermediary. That is an unresolved alternative, not an asserted payment route. Do not create an edge from either legal entity to CeSIA on the basis of the shared Longview name.</p>\n<h2 id=\"narrowed-next-record-and-integration-decision\">Narrowed next record and integration decision</h2>\n<p>The next decisive record is the <strong>grant award/agreement or remittance advice explicitly referencing the December 9, 2025 recommendation</strong>, paired with CeSIA&#x27;s corresponding donor-receipt ledger entry. It needs the counterparty&#x27;s legal name, signature/award date, paid amount and date, currency, period covered, restrictions and any instalment conditions. A grant promise or unsigned schedule would still not prove receipt; an accounting receivable would need separation from cash received.</p>\n<p>Likely custodians are CeSIA&#x27;s operations/finance function and Longview&#x27;s relevant grants administrator. If an intermediary handled the gift, its remittance record should identify that route. No assumption is made that a particular named form of document exists. No contact was made. A future recipient financial statement or public grant announcement could satisfy the same question if it identifies the recommendation unambiguously; generic total-income growth cannot.</p>\n<p>No new executed-grant, received-payment or campaign-restriction edge is recommended. Preserve the earlier recipient-reported recommendation and its undated non-receipt statement. The new activity self-reports can be considered in the formation/follow-through lane independently of finance. Do not reopen the closed Longview Drive-report or scanned TFS990 acquisition routes based on this note.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/followthrough-finance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-longview-legal"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 2026-09-09. One bounded follow-up pass. Only this file written; no canonical edits, outreach, submissions, account access or closed-route retries.\n\n**Result: unresolved.** No inspected later public disclosure establishes that CeSIA's reported December 9, 2025 recommendation of $2 million over two years became an executed grant or a received payment. The legal grantor, payment schedule and restrictions remain unknown. This is a bounded search result, not evidence that payment never happened.\n\n## Starting claim preserved\n\nThe earlier CeSIA Manifund diplomatic-sprint proposal (see source references) final funding-history answer, reports the recommendation and expressly distinguished it from money received. The page's creation date is December 4, 2025, earlier than the recommendation date cited in its text. The funding answer's update date was not visible. It cannot establish the receipt position on September 9, 2026. Its separate $0 platform display also does not establish total off-platform funding. This pass did not replace that dated-state qualification with a current unpaid claim.\n\n## Later sources actually inspected\n\n| Source, date and exact locator | Observation relevant to receipt |\n| --- | --- |\n| CeSIA year-end newsletter (see source references) December 30, 2025; introductory organizational review and “La vie du CeSIA / Appel aux dons pour soutenir notre action” | Describes the call and other activities, thanks individual donors and solicits support for 2026. No matching institutional amount, legal grantor, executed agreement or receipt is disclosed in these passages. A general appeal does not demonstrate that the Longview recommendation was unfulfilled. |\n| Garde-à-vous @Grok (see source references) January 8, 2026; “La vie du CeSIA” | Reports selection for a three-year European Commission evaluation project with consortium partners. This is evidence of another activity, not receipt of the Longview-recommended funding. No payment value or matching grant identified. |\n| Le Bon, la Brute et le Truand (see source references) March 5, 2026; French “La vie du CeSIA” section read from public RSS | Reports return from New Delhi and a Red Lines workshop at UNESCO for the IASEAI annual meeting. This supports reported implementation of work contemplated in the proposal; it does not identify its financing. |\n| L'enfer est pavé de bonnes inventions (see source references) March 12, 2026; French “La vie du CeSIA” section read from public RSS | Reports a Sciences Po governance roundtable and a previous-week London workshop involving lab staff and safety researchers. The inspected section names no matching grant or payment. |\n| The Sweet Escape (see source references) August 27, 2026; “Inside CeSIA” | Reports educational and policy activity; no institutional receipt update. Other claims in the newsletter were not fact-checked or adopted by this finance inquiry. |\n| CeSIA About (see source references) current undated page; “They trust us” | Continues to describe institutional/philanthropic support in aggregate. It does not identify the $2 million recommendation, subsequent receipt, legal grantor or campaign restriction. The currentness of the page is not a date for its underlying grants. |\n\nThese are primary organizer self-reports. The absence of a payment notice in them cannot resolve a private ledger entry. Reported staffing, events and output likewise cannot identify which funding source paid for them.\n\n## What the newsletter pass covered\n\nThe ordinary public RSS feed (see source references) returned HTTP200 and 1,001,547 bytes. SHA-256 of bytes inspected in memory: `0507e8729d65882a42087c392d6eaabcdd9e68b7ff9ab9fde4f55a3da8bd9fc7`. Original RSS bytes were not retained. It contained 20 entries dated November 26, 2025–August 27, 2026, including 16 entries dated 2026 (one French/English pair is not two independent reports).\n\nThe article bodies supplied in the feed were programmatically screened for Longview, $2M / two-million numeric forms and same-line CeSIA/funding language; there were no matches under that screen. This is keyword-screening scope, not a claim of exhaustive manual reading. The organizational sections itemized above were read; the year-end, January 8 and August 27 pages were additionally opened through the web reader. A section-extraction pass also returned February organizational announcements, but some bilingual output was truncated and no full-archive reading is claimed. The archive web page itself was stale relative to the RSS feed, showing June as its newest visible entry; the RSS supplied the fresher date boundary.\n\nTargeted English/French searches combined CeSIA with Longview, funding, grants, financing, annual reports and the specific amount, including organizer, newsletter and funder domains. They surfaced the existing proposal, older funding acknowledgments and unrelated current projects, but no newly inspected executed-grant or payment document. This is not a comprehensive search of every possible publication or spelling.\n\n## Legal grantor: a necessary distinction, now directly documented\n\nLongview's Organizational Structure (see source references) opening paragraph and the two entity sections, describes Longview Philanthropy as an umbrella name for separate independent organizations: Longview Philanthropy USA Inc., U.S. EIN 93-2664730; and Longview Inc. Ltd, England and Wales company 14444004. It states that each is responsible for its own activities. Current webpage; no publication date shown. Substantive organizational description read in full; no board/personnel relations added.\n\nNeither this page nor CeSIA's recommendation claim selects one of those entities as the $2 million legal grantor. It also remains possible that a donor advised by Longview would grant directly or through another intermediary. That is an unresolved alternative, not an asserted payment route. Do not create an edge from either legal entity to CeSIA on the basis of the shared Longview name.\n\n## Narrowed next record and integration decision\n\nThe next decisive record is the **grant award/agreement or remittance advice explicitly referencing the December 9, 2025 recommendation**, paired with CeSIA's corresponding donor-receipt ledger entry. It needs the counterparty's legal name, signature/award date, paid amount and date, currency, period covered, restrictions and any instalment conditions. A grant promise or unsigned schedule would still not prove receipt; an accounting receivable would need separation from cash received.\n\nLikely custodians are CeSIA's operations/finance function and Longview's relevant grants administrator. If an intermediary handled the gift, its remittance record should identify that route. No assumption is made that a particular named form of document exists. No contact was made. A future recipient financial statement or public grant announcement could satisfy the same question if it identifies the recommendation unambiguously; generic total-income growth cannot.\n\nNo new executed-grant, received-payment or campaign-restriction edge is recommended. Preserve the earlier recipient-reported recommendation and its undated non-receipt statement. The new activity self-reports can be considered in the formation/follow-through lane independently of finance. Do not reopen the closed Longview Drive-report or scanned TFS990 acquisition routes based on this note.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-finance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7",
        "title": "France/G7 follow-through: CeSIA's proposed diplomatic sprint versus public outcomes",
        "description": "Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded acquisition note for parent review; no canonical case changes. Source identifiers below are local candidate labels, not existing-case IDs. Reuse canonical CeSIA, France/G7, Charbel-Raphaël Ségerie and other established identities during integration.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded acquisition note for parent review; no canonical case changes. Source identifiers below are local candidate labels, not existing-case IDs. Reuse canonical CeSIA, France/G7, Charbel-Raphaël Ségerie and other established identities during integration.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>There is a documented connection through an event programme and co-organizer relationship, plus a partial functional overlap with the G7 programme. The inspected outcomes do not establish CeSIA&#x27;s proposed G7 commitment to prepare a coordinated slowdown, and no public transmission or drafting record attributes the relevant official language to CeSIA. That is a bounded result about these records, not proof of no private influence or a verdict on the campaign&#x27;s whole success.</p>\n<p>The strongest new government-side record is the Digital and Technology Ministers&#x27; declaration from their <strong>29 May 2026 Paris meeting</strong>. Its risk-assessment discussion commitment is more specific than generic AI-safety rhetoric. The strongest new access-side record is a <strong>10 March 2026 Sciences Po/CeSIA programme naming Alexandre Mirlesse, a French foreign-ministry AI/tech diplomat</strong>, as a moderator. Neither record closes the connection between campaign proposal and negotiated wording.</p>\n<h2 id=\"proposed-objective-and-observed-outcome\">Proposed objective and observed outcome</h2>\n<p><strong>S1 — CeSIA&#x27;s original public fundraising proposal.</strong> The Manifund page, created 4 December 2025, identifies France as its preferred champion state. Its June target is a G7 statement preparing multilateral capacity to slow AI development together following extreme warning events or crossed red lines; it expressly distinguishes preparation from immediate action. Its separate technical track seeks common risk thresholds. It also targets a September 2026 UNGA resolution and claims prior high-level French briefings without naming recipients, dates or documents. These are project aims and self-reported experience. The page&#x27;s fundraising status does not establish the campaign&#x27;s total receipts or execution. Locator: “Why CeSIA,” “Track 1,” “Track 2,” June and September calendar items, and “Policy Influence.” [Original proposal](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>S2 — Actual ministerial declaration.</strong> The five-page French original says ministers met on 29 May. PDF page 2 commits to French-presidency discussions involving the international AI measurement/evaluation/science network and OECD to improve mutual understanding and comparability of AI risk-assessment frameworks, alongside innovation and adoption. This overlaps functionally with harmonization, but does not adopt a common threshold or a slowdown trigger. The complete extracted text has no matches for <code>ralent</code>, <code>seuil</code>, <code>ligne rouge</code>, <code>lignes rouges</code>, <code>CeSIA</code>, <code>red line</code>, <code>moratoire</code> or <code>suspend</code>; the conclusion also rests on reading, not keyword absence alone. Page 1 expressly continues the Hiroshima process dating to 2023 and its later reporting work. Pages 3–5 name OSI, OECD and Inria contributions to other specific outputs, but do not credit CeSIA. Those credits demonstrate that attributable contributions can appear in this instrument; omission does not exclude uncredited input. [Ministerial original](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>S3 — Presidential account and announced continuation.</strong> On 17 June, Macron&#x27;s official closing transcript describes a prospective platform among democracies for AI-security cooperation and common standards, with a September meeting planned to finalize work. He frames frontier-model regulation partly around authoritarian access and cyber threats. This is the French President&#x27;s account of discussions and announced follow-up; it is not the text of a collectively adopted slowdown instrument. His list of nine adopted leaders&#x27; statements includes the separate minors call. Locator: AI discussion paragraphs beginning “Lastly” through the September meeting, and opening adopted-statements list. [Official transcript, marked check against delivery](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>S4 — Earlier government agenda.</strong> An Élysée page published 5 February already identifies safe AI, AI adoption, environmental effects and minors&#x27; protection as the digital track&#x27;s four priorities. It names the responsible ministers and the planned 29 May meeting. This predates the March event. It cannot show that CeSIA had no earlier input, but it prevents attributing the priority&#x27;s origin to that later event. Locator: four digital axes and meeting calendar. [Official priorities](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-named-access-connection\">The named access connection</h2>\n<p><strong>S5 — Host institutional programme.</strong> Sciences Po identifies its School of Management and Impact, Les Mardis de l&#x27;IA and CeSIA as co-organizers of the 10 March event. Mirlesse is scheduled to moderate Alexei Grinbaum&#x27;s fireside discussion and appears in the closing patronage/organizing acknowledgment. The programme identifies him as an AI/tech diplomat at France&#x27;s foreign ministry. It also schedules Nicolas Miailhe, Lord Tim Clement-Jones, Indian deputy mission chief Eenam Gambhir and Swiss foreign-ministry official Miriam Minder. Charbel Ségerie introduces Yoshua Bengio. These are named programme roles, not independent attendance proof, civil-service instructions, or evidence that a G7 negotiator received a red-lines draft. Locator: organizers, agenda and closing acknowledgment. [Host programme](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>S6 — Organizer&#x27;s retrospective.</strong> CeSIA&#x27;s 25-page conference report recounts the event and says the French presidency awarded it a G7 label (PDF page 22). Page 10 connects CeSIA&#x27;s red-lines campaign to its French-presidency ambitions. The report describes France as responding to laboratory leaders&#x27; calls, but bundles Davos and the later Delhi summit beside an early-February French announcement. That narrative cannot establish that a later Delhi appeal caused the earlier priority. Earlier appeals or earlier advocacy remain possible. The report also overstates the UN scientific panel&#x27;s mandate as translating consensus into binding commitments; do not inherit that characterization. A label award letter, its criteria, and any government receipt of the report were not acquired. Label recognition would still require a separate basis before being treated as endorsement of the proposed slowdown. Locator: PDF pages 10 and 22; event agenda pages 23–24. [Organizer&#x27;s original report](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The report is linked from CeSIA&#x27;s 30 April retrospective by Pauline Charazac and Charbel-Raphaël Ségerie. This date is a publication marker for the retrospective, not necessarily an embedded PDF version date. [Retrospective page](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relationships-for-integration\">Candidate relationships for integration</h2>\n<p>These are separate edges; do not join them into a causal path without the missing transmission record.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate ID</th>\n<th>Typed relationship</th>\n<th>Evidence and stage</th>\n<th>Boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>fg7-e1</td>\n<td>CeSIA → French G7 presidency: targets as champion-state opportunity</td>\n<td>S1; reported intention / proposed</td>\n<td>No government acceptance established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>fg7-e2</td>\n<td>CeSIA → March10 Sciences Po event: co-organizer</td>\n<td>S5; source record of programme; retrospective S6 reports event held</td>\n<td>Organization is not state endorsement</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>fg7-e3</td>\n<td>Alexandre Mirlesse → March10 event: scheduled moderator and named in patronage acknowledgment</td>\n<td>S5; source record / scheduled role; S6 retrospective is organizer account</td>\n<td>No inferred G7 drafting mandate or agency-wide approval</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>fg7-e4</td>\n<td>French G7 presidency → March10 event: awarded G7 label</td>\n<td>S6 PDF22; attributed organizer report</td>\n<td>Award instrument, criteria and exact endorsement scope missing</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>fg7-e5</td>\n<td>G7 digital ministers → risk-framework comparability discussions: public commitment</td>\n<td>S2 PDF2; source record / announced future work</td>\n<td>Not a completed workshop, common threshold, or coordinated slowdown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>fg7-e6</td>\n<td>French President → democracies AI-security platform and September meeting: announces follow-up</td>\n<td>S3 AI passage; source record of presidential statement / announced</td>\n<td>Not a separately inspected collective treaty or CeSIA-attributed outcome</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Do not create CeSIA → G7 language “drafted,” “secured,” “caused,” or “adopted” edges from these materials. A possible semantic-overlap observation belongs in an analytical note rather than as an influence fact. Mirlesse&#x27;s exact programme title is contemporaneous; do not silently substitute an independently assumed senior envoy role.</p>\n<h2 id=\"rival-explanations-and-the-decisive-remaining-record\">Rival explanations and the decisive remaining record</h2>\n<p>The official documents support an independent institutional pathway: earlier Hiroshima/GPAI/OECD work, France&#x27;s already published agenda, and leaders&#x27; stated security/adoption concerns. CeSIA may have reinforced that agenda, sought access after it was established, contributed through an uncredited channel, or failed to secure its specific threshold/slowdown ask. Current evidence discriminates against treating the June outcome as fulfillment of that ask; it does not choose among all these influence alternatives.</p>\n<p>The most useful missing object is a dated CeSIA submission and its recipient acknowledgment or a negotiator&#x27;s draft/change record identifying whether risk-comparability or slowdown language was proposed, accepted, softened or rejected. Likely custodians are CeSIA&#x27;s policy team and the relevant French foreign-ministry/digital-track or presidential G7 negotiating teams. Event attendance, a G7 label, and matching vocabulary cannot substitute for that object. The label award letter is a separate, narrower record about recognition scope.</p>\n<p>As of 9 September, September follow-up and the proposal&#x27;s September UNGA target are still within their stated target month. Absence from this bounded pass is not a finding that either later event or resolution has failed. No public correspondence, meeting minutes or red-lines draft receipt was recovered in the inspected French/G7 sources.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-and-reading-scope\">Acquisition and reading scope</h2>\n<p>All reads were public originals or publisher-owned accounts. No private APIs, access bypass, outreach or payment. Source bodies were inspected through web readers or ordinary public GET. Only this note is saved under this assignment; the hashes below identify response bytes inspected in memory, <strong>not locally retained original files</strong>.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Origin and extent read</th>\n<th>SHA-256 of inspected HTTP200 bytes where acquired</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>S1</td>\n<td>Original Manifund proposal; substantive proposal, calendar, experience and success-level sections, current metadata</td>\n<td>Web reader; no byte hash</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S2</td>\n<td>French government-hosted PDF; all five pages extracted and read across two outputs; whole-text keyword search</td>\n<td><code>d60f5a67035807d2a9ba1c53e0542538585c975037ec966c82445af68c835f43</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S3</td>\n<td>Official English presidential transcript; AI section, statement list and relevant procedural framing; duplicate body not a second source</td>\n<td><code>178b5a8f6c51df2610593d88bbe33cb0d3f3ae184123d1389910c1bfc79f318b</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S4</td>\n<td>Official priorities page; complete substantive main body</td>\n<td><code>ec35904be329b85c96a0654a582844df9825e16e87b63d2145bc199e206d6e7d</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S5</td>\n<td>Host&#x27;s event page; complete substantive event description, programme and acknowledgments; navigation excluded</td>\n<td><code>5cf4bfa296cd4865370bfff7381abdbdd85e4346dc39d9f812c4c5e90390fddc</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S6</td>\n<td>CeSIA PDF; scoped read pages3–4,10,19–24, with pages10/22 rechecked directly; not a complete close reading of every page</td>\n<td><code>3cd31074aef822a3062f00104c3ca2e58d5a24310ccd917cf9128bd891b91895</code></td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The [Élysée 16 June digital-priorities summary](http[local research file] was also read and supplied the original ministerial PDF route. Its publication date must not replace the PDF&#x27;s 29 May meeting date. The separate minors annex was only initially scoped; this note makes no fresh detailed findings about its provisions.</p>\n<p>Bounded searches combined CeSIA/G7 with elysee.fr, diplomatie.gouv.fr and economie.gouv.fr and searched the target slowdown concept. They did not return an attributable government drafting/briefing receipt. This is search-scope evidence, not an exhaustive registry audit. The web reader failed on the ministerial PDF; one ordinary GET substitute succeeded. A transcript link-number click failed, and no claim relies on that unresolved link. Closed UN Geneva403, Security Council PDF202 and UNESCO SharePoint401 routes were not retried.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/followthrough-france-g7.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-follow-s-sciencespo",
          "w8-follow-s-cesia-report",
          "w8-follow-s-g7-ministerial",
          "w8-follow-s-elysee-priorities",
          "w8-follow-s-elysee-june"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded acquisition note for parent review; no canonical case changes. Source identifiers below are local candidate labels, not existing-case IDs. Reuse canonical CeSIA, France/G7, Charbel-Raphaël Ségerie and other established identities during integration.\n\n## Finding\n\nThere is a documented connection through an event programme and co-organizer relationship, plus a partial functional overlap with the G7 programme. The inspected outcomes do not establish CeSIA's proposed G7 commitment to prepare a coordinated slowdown, and no public transmission or drafting record attributes the relevant official language to CeSIA. That is a bounded result about these records, not proof of no private influence or a verdict on the campaign's whole success.\n\nThe strongest new government-side record is the Digital and Technology Ministers' declaration from their **29 May 2026 Paris meeting**. Its risk-assessment discussion commitment is more specific than generic AI-safety rhetoric. The strongest new access-side record is a **10 March 2026 Sciences Po/CeSIA programme naming Alexandre Mirlesse, a French foreign-ministry AI/tech diplomat**, as a moderator. Neither record closes the connection between campaign proposal and negotiated wording.\n\n## Proposed objective and observed outcome\n\n**S1 — CeSIA's original public fundraising proposal.** The Manifund page, created 4 December 2025, identifies France as its preferred champion state. Its June target is a G7 statement preparing multilateral capacity to slow AI development together following extreme warning events or crossed red lines; it expressly distinguishes preparation from immediate action. Its separate technical track seeks common risk thresholds. It also targets a September 2026 UNGA resolution and claims prior high-level French briefings without naming recipients, dates or documents. These are project aims and self-reported experience. The page's fundraising status does not establish the campaign's total receipts or execution. Locator: “Why CeSIA,” “Track 1,” “Track 2,” June and September calendar items, and “Policy Influence.” Original proposal (see source references)\n\n**S2 — Actual ministerial declaration.** The five-page French original says ministers met on 29 May. PDF page 2 commits to French-presidency discussions involving the international AI measurement/evaluation/science network and OECD to improve mutual understanding and comparability of AI risk-assessment frameworks, alongside innovation and adoption. This overlaps functionally with harmonization, but does not adopt a common threshold or a slowdown trigger. The complete extracted text has no matches for `ralent`, `seuil`, `ligne rouge`, `lignes rouges`, `CeSIA`, `red line`, `moratoire` or `suspend`; the conclusion also rests on reading, not keyword absence alone. Page 1 expressly continues the Hiroshima process dating to 2023 and its later reporting work. Pages 3–5 name OSI, OECD and Inria contributions to other specific outputs, but do not credit CeSIA. Those credits demonstrate that attributable contributions can appear in this instrument; omission does not exclude uncredited input. Ministerial original (see source references)\n\n**S3 — Presidential account and announced continuation.** On 17 June, Macron's official closing transcript describes a prospective platform among democracies for AI-security cooperation and common standards, with a September meeting planned to finalize work. He frames frontier-model regulation partly around authoritarian access and cyber threats. This is the French President's account of discussions and announced follow-up; it is not the text of a collectively adopted slowdown instrument. His list of nine adopted leaders' statements includes the separate minors call. Locator: AI discussion paragraphs beginning “Lastly” through the September meeting, and opening adopted-statements list. Official transcript, marked check against delivery (see source references)\n\n**S4 — Earlier government agenda.** An Élysée page published 5 February already identifies safe AI, AI adoption, environmental effects and minors' protection as the digital track's four priorities. It names the responsible ministers and the planned 29 May meeting. This predates the March event. It cannot show that CeSIA had no earlier input, but it prevents attributing the priority's origin to that later event. Locator: four digital axes and meeting calendar. Official priorities (see source references)\n\n## The named access connection\n\n**S5 — Host institutional programme.** Sciences Po identifies its School of Management and Impact, Les Mardis de l'IA and CeSIA as co-organizers of the 10 March event. Mirlesse is scheduled to moderate Alexei Grinbaum's fireside discussion and appears in the closing patronage/organizing acknowledgment. The programme identifies him as an AI/tech diplomat at France's foreign ministry. It also schedules Nicolas Miailhe, Lord Tim Clement-Jones, Indian deputy mission chief Eenam Gambhir and Swiss foreign-ministry official Miriam Minder. Charbel Ségerie introduces Yoshua Bengio. These are named programme roles, not independent attendance proof, civil-service instructions, or evidence that a G7 negotiator received a red-lines draft. Locator: organizers, agenda and closing acknowledgment. Host programme (see source references)\n\n**S6 — Organizer's retrospective.** CeSIA's 25-page conference report recounts the event and says the French presidency awarded it a G7 label (PDF page 22). Page 10 connects CeSIA's red-lines campaign to its French-presidency ambitions. The report describes France as responding to laboratory leaders' calls, but bundles Davos and the later Delhi summit beside an early-February French announcement. That narrative cannot establish that a later Delhi appeal caused the earlier priority. Earlier appeals or earlier advocacy remain possible. The report also overstates the UN scientific panel's mandate as translating consensus into binding commitments; do not inherit that characterization. A label award letter, its criteria, and any government receipt of the report were not acquired. Label recognition would still require a separate basis before being treated as endorsement of the proposed slowdown. Locator: PDF pages 10 and 22; event agenda pages 23–24. Organizer's original report (see source references)\n\nThe report is linked from CeSIA's 30 April retrospective by Pauline Charazac and Charbel-Raphaël Ségerie. This date is a publication marker for the retrospective, not necessarily an embedded PDF version date. Retrospective page (see source references)\n\n## Candidate relationships for integration\n\nThese are separate edges; do not join them into a causal path without the missing transmission record.\n\n| Candidate ID | Typed relationship | Evidence and stage | Boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| fg7-e1 | CeSIA → French G7 presidency: targets as champion-state opportunity | S1; reported intention / proposed | No government acceptance established |\n| fg7-e2 | CeSIA → March10 Sciences Po event: co-organizer | S5; source record of programme; retrospective S6 reports event held | Organization is not state endorsement |\n| fg7-e3 | Alexandre Mirlesse → March10 event: scheduled moderator and named in patronage acknowledgment | S5; source record / scheduled role; S6 retrospective is organizer account | No inferred G7 drafting mandate or agency-wide approval |\n| fg7-e4 | French G7 presidency → March10 event: awarded G7 label | S6 PDF22; attributed organizer report | Award instrument, criteria and exact endorsement scope missing |\n| fg7-e5 | G7 digital ministers → risk-framework comparability discussions: public commitment | S2 PDF2; source record / announced future work | Not a completed workshop, common threshold, or coordinated slowdown |\n| fg7-e6 | French President → democracies AI-security platform and September meeting: announces follow-up | S3 AI passage; source record of presidential statement / announced | Not a separately inspected collective treaty or CeSIA-attributed outcome |\n\nDo not create CeSIA → G7 language “drafted,” “secured,” “caused,” or “adopted” edges from these materials. A possible semantic-overlap observation belongs in an analytical note rather than as an influence fact. Mirlesse's exact programme title is contemporaneous; do not silently substitute an independently assumed senior envoy role.\n\n## Rival explanations and the decisive remaining record\n\nThe official documents support an independent institutional pathway: earlier Hiroshima/GPAI/OECD work, France's already published agenda, and leaders' stated security/adoption concerns. CeSIA may have reinforced that agenda, sought access after it was established, contributed through an uncredited channel, or failed to secure its specific threshold/slowdown ask. Current evidence discriminates against treating the June outcome as fulfillment of that ask; it does not choose among all these influence alternatives.\n\nThe most useful missing object is a dated CeSIA submission and its recipient acknowledgment or a negotiator's draft/change record identifying whether risk-comparability or slowdown language was proposed, accepted, softened or rejected. Likely custodians are CeSIA's policy team and the relevant French foreign-ministry/digital-track or presidential G7 negotiating teams. Event attendance, a G7 label, and matching vocabulary cannot substitute for that object. The label award letter is a separate, narrower record about recognition scope.\n\nAs of 9 September, September follow-up and the proposal's September UNGA target are still within their stated target month. Absence from this bounded pass is not a finding that either later event or resolution has failed. No public correspondence, meeting minutes or red-lines draft receipt was recovered in the inspected French/G7 sources.\n\n## Acquisition and reading scope\n\nAll reads were public originals or publisher-owned accounts. No private APIs, access bypass, outreach or payment. Source bodies were inspected through web readers or ordinary public GET. Only this note is saved under this assignment; the hashes below identify response bytes inspected in memory, **not locally retained original files**.\n\n| Source | Origin and extent read | SHA-256 of inspected HTTP200 bytes where acquired |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| S1 | Original Manifund proposal; substantive proposal, calendar, experience and success-level sections, current metadata | Web reader; no byte hash |\n| S2 | French government-hosted PDF; all five pages extracted and read across two outputs; whole-text keyword search | `d60f5a67035807d2a9ba1c53e0542538585c975037ec966c82445af68c835f43` |\n| S3 | Official English presidential transcript; AI section, statement list and relevant procedural framing; duplicate body not a second source | `178b5a8f6c51df2610593d88bbe33cb0d3f3ae184123d1389910c1bfc79f318b` |\n| S4 | Official priorities page; complete substantive main body | `ec35904be329b85c96a0654a582844df9825e16e87b63d2145bc199e206d6e7d` |\n| S5 | Host's event page; complete substantive event description, programme and acknowledgments; navigation excluded | `5cf4bfa296cd4865370bfff7381abdbdd85e4346dc39d9f812c4c5e90390fddc` |\n| S6 | CeSIA PDF; scoped read pages3–4,10,19–24, with pages10/22 rechecked directly; not a complete close reading of every page | `3cd31074aef822a3062f00104c3ca2e58d5a24310ccd917cf9128bd891b91895` |\n\nThe Élysée 16 June digital-priorities summary (see source references) was also read and supplied the original ministerial PDF route. Its publication date must not replace the PDF's 29 May meeting date. The separate minors annex was only initially scoped; this note makes no fresh detailed findings about its provisions.\n\nBounded searches combined CeSIA/G7 with elysee.fr, diplomatie.gouv.fr and economie.gouv.fr and searched the target slowdown concept. They did not return an attributable government drafting/briefing receipt. This is search-scope evidence, not an exhaustive registry audit. The web reader failed on the ministerial PDF; one ordinary GET substitute succeeded. A transcript link-number click failed, and no claim relies on that unresolved link. Closed UN Geneva403, Security Council PDF202 and UNESCO SharePoint401 routes were not retried.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-followthrough-france-g7.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding",
        "title": "Organizer resources behind the Global Call for AI Red Lines",
        "description": "Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded organizer-funding slice; primary public records and organizer self-reports. This file contains proposed relations only; no canonical case changes. Web-reader text was inspected unless an access note says otherwise. No source originals are alongside this file.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded organizer-funding slice; primary public records and organizer self-reports. This file contains proposed relations only; no canonical case changes. Web-reader text was inspected unless an access note says otherwise. No source originals are retained alongside this file.</p>\n<p>The strongest financial connection is a shared intermediary: Effektiv Spenden reports supporting both CeSIA and The Future Society after Longview Philanthropy recommendations. These are organizational funding records. A separate CeSIA solicitation explicitly budgets Red Lines diplomatic follow-through. No inspected record establishes a paid, campaign-restricted grant, the launch&#x27;s total cost, or donor authority over its wording.</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-identity-and-accounting-scope\">Legal identity and accounting scope</h2>\n<p><strong>CeSIA.</strong> Its [legal notice](http[local research file] section 1, identifies the publisher as Centre pour la Sécurité de l&#x27;Intelligence Artificielle, an association loi 1901, RNA W751277787. This is its own legal-identity statement, not an independently acquired RNA registry certificate. It does not establish which entity received every earlier grant.</p>\n<p><strong>The Future Society.</strong> Its [overview](http[local research file] “Who We Are” and “Transparency,” says it became a U.S.-registered 501(c)(3) in 2016. SFF identifies the receiving charity as The Future Society, Inc. The overview describes philanthropic contributions plus donations and service contracts involving governments, intergovernmental and private organizations. Its statement that contributors receive no substantial return benefit uses tax terminology; it does not disclose grant approval, publication-clearance, veto or ownership clauses. No such contractual rights were found in the inspected sources.</p>\n<p>The [2024–2025 Impact Report](http[local research file] cover dated April 2026, identifies Red Lines as co-led with CHAI and CeSIA (PDF6). Financial summaries are PDF7–8: 2024 revenue $3,406,697, expenses $1,927,009 and closing net assets $3,630,507; 2025 revenue $1,237,109, expenses $2,854,677 and net assets $2,081,163. The 2024 summary is attributed to audited statements; 2025 is explicitly unaudited. The report explains that a two-year grant received in 2024 supported program spending in 2025, without naming that donor, the grant amount, or a Red Lines allocation. These organizational totals must not become the campaign budget. Reading scope: nine-page text, especially PDF2,6–8; report graphics were not independently visually inspected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reported-transfers-and-grant-recommendations\">Reported transfers and grant recommendations</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Primary record and inspected locator</th>\n<th>Amount / period / state</th>\n<th>Precise relation and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Effektiv Spenden, [H1/2024 fund update](http[local research file] opening paragraphs and “CeSIA”; [fund history](http[local research file]</td>\n<td>€195,000 collected in Germany and Switzerland during H1/2024; fund history says forwarded September 2024</td>\n<td>Effektiv Spenden reports forwarding the fund&#x27;s entire H1 allocation to CeSIA following Longview&#x27;s recommendation. The update describes research, teaching, public engagement and roundtables. Ségerie&#x27;s attributed acknowledgment says support enabled hiring. No Red Lines restriction or project-by-project spending appears.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Effektiv Spenden, [H2/2024 fund update](http[local research file] allocation introduction and “The Future Society”; fund history, H2/2024</td>\n<td>€114,000: €60,000 from the AI fund plus €54,000 from the future-preservation fund; collections H2/2024, forwarded March 2025</td>\n<td>Effektiv Spenden reports supporting TFS following Longview&#x27;s recommendation. Its rationale concerns AI governance and planned U.S. staffing, not a named Red Lines grant. Do not treat the two fund contributions as two additional €114,000 awards.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SFF [recommendation table](http[local research file] header and SFF-2024 CeSIA row</td>\n<td>$48,000, 2024 recommendation; source Jaan Tallinn; receiving charity EffiSciences</td>\n<td>SFF recommended general support of CeSIA through a named receiving charity. This identifies an intermediary; it does not itself disclose a fiscal-sponsorship agreement or confirm disbursement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Same SFF table, TFS rows</td>\n<td>$97,000 in 2024; $336,000 in 2025; Jaan Tallinn named source, TFS Inc. receiving charity</td>\n<td>Separate general-support recommendations, not campaign awards or independently confirmed payments.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Same SFF table, SFF-2023-H2 TFS row</td>\n<td>$365,000 sourced FLI and $11,000 sourced Jaan Tallinn, respectively</td>\n<td>Recommended general support. This predates the call and documents a financial relationship with a later partner, without establishing campaign financing or instructions.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>SFF amounts above are dollars as displayed; no exchange conversion or sum across currencies was made. The table describes its records as recommendations. CHAI-related general-support entries also exist in that database, but no campaign-specific CHAI award emerged, so that broader funding lane was not expanded.</p>\n<h2 id=\"campaign-specific-solicitation-strong-purpose-evidence-no-payment-proof\">Campaign-specific solicitation: strong purpose evidence, no payment proof</h2>\n<p>CeSIA&#x27;s [“From Nobel Signatures to Binding Red Lines: The 2026 Diplomatic Sprint”](http[local research file] is marked created December 4, 2025. The current page shows “Not funded” and $0 raised on Manifund. It requests $150,000 for Q1–Q2 2026 and estimates roughly $400,000 for twelve months: staff, diplomatic travel, workshops, event organization and professional UN lobbying consultation. The team section lists APCO among advisors/partners; this is not an executed contract or payment record.</p>\n<p>The final funding-history answer reports Longview recommended $2 million over two years on December 9, 2025 and explicitly says this was only a recommendation, with no money received yet. That passage necessarily postdates page creation; no update date was visible. Its receipt statement must not become a verified September 2026 bank-balance claim. Nor does placement in this proposal establish that the entire $2 million was restricted to Red Lines. Scope read: complete page, especially project summary, funding-use section and final funding-history answer; embedded budget images not read.</p>\n<h2 id=\"corroborating-disclosures-kept-separate-from-campaign-allocation\">Corroborating disclosures, kept separate from campaign allocation</h2>\n<p>Charbel-Raphaël Ségerie&#x27;s [December 20, 2024 announcement](http[local research file] “Funding,” reports grants from Effektiv Spenden, AISTOF, Longview, an unnamed Swedish foundation and SFF. It distinguishes general operations from targeted initiatives without assigning each donor to a category. It specifically attributes some ML4Good bootcamp funding to Erasmus+ and textbook support mainly to Ryan Kidd through Manifund. This gives concrete examples of other projects; it does not justify attributing those funds to Red Lines. Read relevant funding and adjacent activity passages; no amounts supplied there.</p>\n<p>CeSIA&#x27;s current [about page](http[local research file] “They trust us,” identifies the European Commission, ENS, UK AISI, philanthropic organizations and individuals as funders and says it does not accept funding from private AI companies. This is organizational self-report without amounts, periods or campaign allocation. It is not evidence that every supporter is independent of the AI industry, nor a substitute for grant terms.</p>\n<p>Longview&#x27;s <a>Emerging Challenges Fund page</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relations-for-integration\">Candidate relations for integration</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Subject → precise verb → object</th>\n<th>Evidence and boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Longview → recommended funding to → CeSIA; Effektiv Spenden → reported forwarding €195,000 to → CeSIA</td>\n<td>H1/2024 donor update plus September 2024 transfer statement; organization support, purpose unallocated.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Longview → recommended funding to → TFS; Effektiv Spenden → reported forwarding €114,000 to → TFS</td>\n<td>H2/2024 donor update plus March 2025 transfer statement; organization support.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SFF → recommended general support for → named recipients</td>\n<td>Preserve the separate rows above; receiving-charity designation does not establish control.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CeSIA → solicited funding for → Red Lines follow-through</td>\n<td>Solicitation and reported institutional recommendation only; preserve the dated distinctions above.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>No candidate donor-to-policy-instruction, donor-to-red-line-text approval, APCO-payment, campaign-expenditure-total, or CHAI campaign-award relation is supported at this breakpoint.</p>\n<h2 id=\"access-gaps-and-next-records\">Access gaps and next records</h2>\n<p>TFS&#x27;s organizer-hosted [2024 public Form 990](http[local research file] returned HTTP200, 3,854,546 bytes, 43 pages. SHA-256 of the original bytes read in memory: <code>0bb2940d980c822f7eeb280a3dd0ba50472dc02709c5d58043df4d3c1990d4be</code>. Those bytes were not retained. Web reader had no text, and sampled pages produced no extractable text. The screenshot bridge did not expose images to this session; an in-memory render handoff failed on a warning/JSON parsing issue. The filing&#x27;s substantive content was not inspected and is not used for an EIN, contributor or contractual claim. Stop this acquisition branch rather than treating a file title as content.</p>\n<p>Longview links a [public 2025 ECF report](http[local research file] The web reader exposed only a loading page; one ordinary public download substitute returned HTML rather than PDF. Its contents remain unread. No authentication, donor-only report request or other access workaround was attempted.</p>\n<p>The decisive next records are the Red Lines cost-center ledger and launch/vendor invoices held by TFS/CeSIA finance; CeSIA&#x27;s December 2025 Longview recommendation letter and resulting executed grant agreement/disbursement schedule held by CeSIA and Longview&#x27;s grant team; the EffiSciences–CeSIA receiving/sponsorship agreement and transfer ledger; and restricted-grant schedules for TFS&#x27;s unnamed two-year 2024 grant. These would distinguish funded capacity from campaign expenditure and reveal any approval, reporting, publication or repayment clauses. Their existence and terms have not been established here. No outreach made.</p>\n<p>Stopping condition reached: public records establish shared funding intermediaries, reported organizational transfers, general-support recommendations and an explicit campaign follow-through funding request. They do not establish campaign-restricted paid money or donor control of the call.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/organizer-funding.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-sprint",
          "w8-red-s-eff-2024h1",
          "w8-red-s-eff-2024h2",
          "w8-red-s-eff-history",
          "w8-red-s-sff"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded organizer-funding slice; primary public records and organizer self-reports. This file contains proposed relations only; no canonical case changes. Web-reader text was inspected unless an access note says otherwise. No source originals are retained alongside this file.\n\nThe strongest financial connection is a shared intermediary: Effektiv Spenden reports supporting both CeSIA and The Future Society after Longview Philanthropy recommendations. These are organizational funding records. A separate CeSIA solicitation explicitly budgets Red Lines diplomatic follow-through. No inspected record establishes a paid, campaign-restricted grant, the launch's total cost, or donor authority over its wording.\n\n## Legal identity and accounting scope\n\n**CeSIA.** Its legal notice (see source references) section 1, identifies the publisher as Centre pour la Sécurité de l'Intelligence Artificielle, an association loi 1901, RNA W751277787. This is its own legal-identity statement, not an independently acquired RNA registry certificate. It does not establish which entity received every earlier grant.\n\n**The Future Society.** Its overview (see source references) “Who We Are” and “Transparency,” says it became a U.S.-registered 501(c)(3) in 2016. SFF identifies the receiving charity as The Future Society, Inc. The overview describes philanthropic contributions plus donations and service contracts involving governments, intergovernmental and private organizations. Its statement that contributors receive no substantial return benefit uses tax terminology; it does not disclose grant approval, publication-clearance, veto or ownership clauses. No such contractual rights were found in the inspected sources.\n\nThe 2024–2025 Impact Report (see source references) cover dated April 2026, identifies Red Lines as co-led with CHAI and CeSIA (PDF6). Financial summaries are PDF7–8: 2024 revenue $3,406,697, expenses $1,927,009 and closing net assets $3,630,507; 2025 revenue $1,237,109, expenses $2,854,677 and net assets $2,081,163. The 2024 summary is attributed to audited statements; 2025 is explicitly unaudited. The report explains that a two-year grant received in 2024 supported program spending in 2025, without naming that donor, the grant amount, or a Red Lines allocation. These organizational totals must not become the campaign budget. Reading scope: nine-page text, especially PDF2,6–8; report graphics were not independently visually inspected.\n\n## Reported transfers and grant recommendations\n\n| Primary record and inspected locator | Amount / period / state | Precise relation and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Effektiv Spenden, H1/2024 fund update (see source references) opening paragraphs and “CeSIA”; fund history (see source references) | €195,000 collected in Germany and Switzerland during H1/2024; fund history says forwarded September 2024 | Effektiv Spenden reports forwarding the fund's entire H1 allocation to CeSIA following Longview's recommendation. The update describes research, teaching, public engagement and roundtables. Ségerie's attributed acknowledgment says support enabled hiring. No Red Lines restriction or project-by-project spending appears. |\n| Effektiv Spenden, H2/2024 fund update (see source references) allocation introduction and “The Future Society”; fund history, H2/2024 | €114,000: €60,000 from the AI fund plus €54,000 from the future-preservation fund; collections H2/2024, forwarded March 2025 | Effektiv Spenden reports supporting TFS following Longview's recommendation. Its rationale concerns AI governance and planned U.S. staffing, not a named Red Lines grant. Do not treat the two fund contributions as two additional €114,000 awards. |\n| SFF recommendation table (see source references) header and SFF-2024 CeSIA row | $48,000, 2024 recommendation; source Jaan Tallinn; receiving charity EffiSciences | SFF recommended general support of CeSIA through a named receiving charity. This identifies an intermediary; it does not itself disclose a fiscal-sponsorship agreement or confirm disbursement. |\n| Same SFF table, TFS rows | $97,000 in 2024; $336,000 in 2025; Jaan Tallinn named source, TFS Inc. receiving charity | Separate general-support recommendations, not campaign awards or independently confirmed payments. |\n| Same SFF table, SFF-2023-H2 TFS row | $365,000 sourced FLI and $11,000 sourced Jaan Tallinn, respectively | Recommended general support. This predates the call and documents a financial relationship with a later partner, without establishing campaign financing or instructions. |\n\nSFF amounts above are dollars as displayed; no exchange conversion or sum across currencies was made. The table describes its records as recommendations. CHAI-related general-support entries also exist in that database, but no campaign-specific CHAI award emerged, so that broader funding lane was not expanded.\n\n## Campaign-specific solicitation: strong purpose evidence, no payment proof\n\nCeSIA's “From Nobel Signatures to Binding Red Lines: The 2026 Diplomatic Sprint” (see source references) is marked created December 4, 2025. The current page shows “Not funded” and $0 raised on Manifund. It requests $150,000 for Q1–Q2 2026 and estimates roughly $400,000 for twelve months: staff, diplomatic travel, workshops, event organization and professional UN lobbying consultation. The team section lists APCO among advisors/partners; this is not an executed contract or payment record.\n\nThe final funding-history answer reports Longview recommended $2 million over two years on December 9, 2025 and explicitly says this was only a recommendation, with no money received yet. That passage necessarily postdates page creation; no update date was visible. Its receipt statement must not become a verified September 2026 bank-balance claim. Nor does placement in this proposal establish that the entire $2 million was restricted to Red Lines. Scope read: complete page, especially project summary, funding-use section and final funding-history answer; embedded budget images not read.\n\n## Corroborating disclosures, kept separate from campaign allocation\n\nCharbel-Raphaël Ségerie's December 20, 2024 announcement (see source references) “Funding,” reports grants from Effektiv Spenden, AISTOF, Longview, an unnamed Swedish foundation and SFF. It distinguishes general operations from targeted initiatives without assigning each donor to a category. It specifically attributes some ML4Good bootcamp funding to Erasmus+ and textbook support mainly to Ryan Kidd through Manifund. This gives concrete examples of other projects; it does not justify attributing those funds to Red Lines. Read relevant funding and adjacent activity passages; no amounts supplied there.\n\nCeSIA's current about page (see source references) “They trust us,” identifies the European Commission, ENS, UK AISI, philanthropic organizations and individuals as funders and says it does not accept funding from private AI companies. This is organizational self-report without amounts, periods or campaign allocation. It is not evidence that every supporter is independent of the AI industry, nor a substitute for grant terms.\n\nLongview's Emerging Challenges Fund page.\n\n## Candidate relations for integration\n\n| Subject → precise verb → object | Evidence and boundary |\n| --- | --- |\n| Longview → recommended funding to → CeSIA; Effektiv Spenden → reported forwarding €195,000 to → CeSIA | H1/2024 donor update plus September 2024 transfer statement; organization support, purpose unallocated. |\n| Longview → recommended funding to → TFS; Effektiv Spenden → reported forwarding €114,000 to → TFS | H2/2024 donor update plus March 2025 transfer statement; organization support. |\n| SFF → recommended general support for → named recipients | Preserve the separate rows above; receiving-charity designation does not establish control. |\n| CeSIA → solicited funding for → Red Lines follow-through | Solicitation and reported institutional recommendation only; preserve the dated distinctions above. |\n\nNo candidate donor-to-policy-instruction, donor-to-red-line-text approval, APCO-payment, campaign-expenditure-total, or CHAI campaign-award relation is supported at this breakpoint.\n\n## Access gaps and next records\n\nTFS's organizer-hosted 2024 public Form 990 (see source references) returned HTTP200, 3,854,546 bytes, 43 pages. SHA-256 of the original bytes read in memory: `0bb2940d980c822f7eeb280a3dd0ba50472dc02709c5d58043df4d3c1990d4be`. Those bytes were not retained. Web reader had no text, and sampled pages produced no extractable text. The screenshot bridge did not expose images to this session; an in-memory render handoff failed on a warning/JSON parsing issue. The filing's substantive content was not inspected and is not used for an EIN, contributor or contractual claim. Stop this acquisition branch rather than treating a file title as content.\n\nLongview links a public 2025 ECF report (see source references) The web reader exposed only a loading page; one ordinary public download substitute returned HTML rather than PDF. Its contents remain unread. No authentication, donor-only report request or other access workaround was attempted.\n\nThe decisive next records are the Red Lines cost-center ledger and launch/vendor invoices held by TFS/CeSIA finance; CeSIA's December 2025 Longview recommendation letter and resulting executed grant agreement/disbursement schedule held by CeSIA and Longview's grant team; the EffiSciences–CeSIA receiving/sponsorship agreement and transfer ledger; and restricted-grant schedules for TFS's unnamed two-year 2024 grant. These would distinguish funded capacity from campaign expenditure and reveal any approval, reporting, publication or repayment clauses. Their existence and terms have not been established here. No outreach made.\n\nStopping condition reached: public records establish shared funding intermediaries, reported organizational transfers, general-support recommendations and an explicit campaign follow-through funding request. They do not establish campaign-restricted paid money or donor control of the call.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-organizer-funding.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake",
        "title": "Global Call for AI Red Lines: policy access and uptake",
        "description": "Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded public-source inquiry; candidate findings only. No canonical-case edits, outreach, publication, or paid access. Scope: identifiable carriers, institutional venues, and the difference between receiving a demand and adopting it. Six evidence clusters follow. The result is documented access plus a continuing civil-society workstream",
        "html": "<p>Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded public-source inquiry; candidate findings only. No canonical-case edits, outreach, publication, or paid access. Scope: identifiable carriers, institutional venues, and the difference between receiving a demand and adopting it. Six evidence clusters follow. The result is documented access plus a continuing civil-society workstream, with no binding adoption of the campaign established by the records inspected here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"1-maria-ressa-carried-the-named-campaign-into-a-un-general-assembly-speech\">1. Maria Ressa carried the named campaign into a UN General Assembly speech</h2>\n<p><strong>U1 — UN-hosted prepared statement, 22 September 2025.</strong> [Speech for UN 80th Anniversary General Assembly](http[local research file] Maria A. Ressa. Read all four pages; decisive locator PDF page 3, “Three Solutions,” first solution. Ressa explicitly names the Global Call, says more than 200 people will launch it later that day, and asks governments to define international boundaries for unacceptable AI risks. This is a submitted/prepared speech on the UN&#x27;s statement service, not a General Assembly resolution or proof every word was delivered. It supports a named public carrier and recipient venue. It does not establish an agreed UN position, a campaign drafting contract, or who obtained her speaking invitation.</p>\n<p>Acquisition: web PDF parser failed; ordinary public GET succeeded (HTTP 200), parsed in memory with pypdf. Original-byte SHA-256: <code>add56fc6bb85bf06b39a110e9aa8f3b49064859125287af9378df636a941e471</code>. Bytes were not retained because this lane was restricted to this note.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2-yoshua-bengio-presented-the-red-lines-initiative-at-the-security-council-the-same-meeting-contained-opposition\">2. Yoshua Bengio presented the red-lines initiative at the Security Council; the same meeting contained opposition</h2>\n<p><strong>U2 — UN-hosted automatic transcript, Security Council meeting 10005, 24 September 2025.</strong> [Transcript](http[local research file] Scoped read of Bengio&#x27;s intervention, especially the paragraph beginning “Earlier this week,” and the United States intervention. Bengio refers to the newly supported international red lines and calls for government visibility and control. The US speaker rejects international bodies asserting centralized AI governance. These are evidence of presentation and disagreement, not a Council decision or proof the US statement targeted this campaign specifically.</p>\n<p>The service explicitly states its automatic transcripts are <strong>not official records or official UN documents</strong>. Its speaker labelling contains errors; use the original meeting catalogue to identify Bengio, not an automated label alone. [Official catalogue S/PV.10005](http[local research file] identifies the meeting and Bengio. The English official-record PDF was indexed but not fully acquired: web parser error, ordinary GET HTTP 202 with empty body. The automatic transcript was the bounded substitute. Hash of obtained transcript HTML: <code>9b6731f529a5f7ab53d673bffccac05409ac2e9db1a4eca7a0db79f51bb1fa34</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"3-unesco-hosts-a-continuing-workstream-with-campaign-organizers-under-an-express-independence-disclaimer\">3. UNESCO hosts a continuing workstream with campaign organizers, under an express independence disclaimer</h2>\n<p><strong>U3a — [International AI Red Lines subgroup](http[local research file] current page, inspected 9 September 2026.</strong> Full substantive page read. Locators: “Subgroup Activities,” “Subgroup Members,” and final disclaimer. The Future Society and Ada Lovelace Institute are co-leads; CeSIA is a member. The page describes a six-month research process and three workshops: New Delhi 18 February, Paris/UNESCO headquarters 26 February, and an Ada-organized virtual roundtable 16 March 2026. It distinguishes future explainer/discussion-paper outputs from a linked two-page brief. Activities are independent CSO/academic work and do not necessarily express UNESCO, member-state or partner views or commit UNESCO. This is an organizational seat and a work programme, not delegated rulemaking authority. HTML hash: <code>5f2d5268da959589a8352a9ec105dd614f3314acd443445db6dd39f11073df5c</code>.</p>\n<p>**U3b — [Multi-Stakeholder Coordination Group](http[local research file] Scoped read of International AI Red Lines subgroup entries. UNESCO names Cami Rincon of Ada and Tereza Zoumpalova of TFS. The latter&#x27;s entry identifies her as a Global Call organizer and leader of TFS&#x27;s red-lines workstream. This connects an identifiable campaign organizer to the network&#x27;s coordination structure. It does not specify personal veto, budget, or member-state approval rights. HTML hash: <code>9a142f15220a0ab3a8b3c4dd17ae3bfcf04697f3f573844e3f700b3c1a45630d</code>.</p>\n<p>**U3c — [Umbrella network page](http[local research file] Read purpose, chronology, activities and funding paragraphs. The network launched in June 2025, before the September campaign; members shape its activities. UNESCO reports initial Patrick J. McGovern Foundation funding through its 2025 inclusive ethical-governance project, and an earlier UKRI-funded pilot. This concerns the umbrella network. It establishes neither a Global Call grant nor campaign-specific donor control. HTML hash: <code>532614bd3086d8a9d30339eadb688bf283a979577c435b67e95b2ce42da9b6f8</code>.</p>\n<p><strong>Output-access frontier:</strong> the subgroup&#x27;s visible Download PDF link resolves to [UNESCO&#x27;s SharePoint share](http[local research file] Public link GET returned viewer HTML; the exact file path exposed by that redirect (<code>CSO_Redlines_compressed.pdf</code>) returned HTTP 401. No authentication or bypass attempted; full brief uninspected. Its title/description are website evidence only. Missing decisive record: readable brief plus version/approval record and any transmission to a member-state delegation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"4-the-campaign-reached-a-uk-parliamentary-demand-controlai-support-is-separately-acknowledged\">4. The campaign reached a UK parliamentary demand; ControlAI support is separately acknowledged</h2>\n<p><strong>U4 — [Hansard, 29 January 2026](http[local research file] “Superintelligent AI.”</strong> Scoped read: Hunt opening at 3.03 pm, Clement-Jones at 3.42 pm, and opening ministerial response at 3.50 pm. Hunt thanks ControlAI for support. Clement-Jones says he joined the Global Call, promotes it, then separately describes ControlAI&#x27;s UK proposals. He declares DLA Piper consultancy and APPG AI co-chairing. The minister, Baroness Lloyd of Effra, describes context-based regulation and AISI work without accepting a campaign treaty or moratorium in the inspected passage.</p>\n<p>The earned mechanism is acknowledged NGO support and a signatory&#x27;s explicit parliamentary advocacy. Support is not evidence of a payment, authorship of Hunt&#x27;s speech, or government commissioning. Clement-Jones&#x27;s interpretation of the call must not silently replace the campaign&#x27;s own text. The minister&#x27;s response is not a comprehensive proof of permanent rejection. Web reader content inspected; native GET returned403, so no original-HTML hash or retained bytes claimed. Needed: the actual briefing sent to Hunt/Clement-Jones, correspondence on requested wording, and any departmental response to the specific campaign proposal.</p>\n<h2 id=\"5-india-provides-a-matched-accessoutcome-comparison\">5. India provides a matched access/outcome comparison</h2>\n<p><strong>U5a — Organizer&#x27;s account: [TFS, Key Takeaways from the India AI Impact Summit](http[local research file] February 2026 event; publication date not independently established.</strong> Read “Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks” and “General Reflections.” TFS says it and CeSIA co-organized a session within AI Safety Connect Day, explicitly building on the campaign. It reports interventions from Denmark&#x27;s tech ambassador Anne Marie Engtoft Meldgaard, Brazil foreign-ministry AI adviser Guilherme Fitzgibbon Alves Pereira, Japan AISI&#x27;s Akiko Murakami, Singapore IMDA&#x27;s Wan Sie Lee, and MEP Brando Benifei. This is named organizer-reported access, not independently confirmed government endorsement. Its own reflections call for moving beyond voluntary commitments. Web reader inspected; ordinary GET403; no captured-original hash claimed.</p>\n<p>**U5b — Government outcome: [PIB/MeitY, New Delhi Declaration](http[local research file] Posted 21 February 2026; live page includes an endorsement list dated 5 March, so it is not an immutable launch-day snapshot. Full declaration annex read, especially “Secure and Trusted AI” and “Conclusion.” It supports industry-led voluntary measures and a voluntary, non-binding Trusted AI Commons; the conclusion likewise emphasizes voluntary/non-binding instruments. The declaration does not name this campaign or enact its requested internationally enforceable prohibitions. No drafting or transmission record links the side event to this text. HTML hash: <code>cf42f235597ee26c30934bd44d5c0e7b5f25dba4737595a7cec02fa09c98cab7</code>.</p>\n<p>Needed to move from attendance to uptake: the workshop paper actually transmitted to the Safe and Trusted AI working group, recipient acknowledgment, tracked draft/declaration edits and decision record. Independent government priorities and pre-existing summit commitments remain adequate alternative explanations for shared language.</p>\n<h2 id=\"6-geneva-do-not-promote-speeches-or-a-summary-into-a-negotiated-agreement\">6. Geneva: do not promote speeches or a summary into a negotiated agreement</h2>\n<p><strong>U6a — [UN Global Dialogue website](http[local research file] and [FAQ](http[local research file] Indexed official-source text was inspected; direct web and ordinary GET access returned403. The homepage advertises a Co-Chairs&#x27; Summary for Geneva 6–7 July 2026. The FAQ says the Dialogue is not a negotiating forum and ends with a co-chair summary. </strong>The summary itself was not acquired or read**, so no claim is made about whether it incorporates particular red-lines recommendations.</p>\n<p>**U6b — [UN automatic closing-session transcript](http[local research file] Scoped review: final co-chair remarks (parsed lines1038–1053) and red-lines search matches. The co-chairs describe diverse views and a summary still to be drafted. The shared-red-lines passage at parsed lines915-918 is a stakeholder intervention, not a negotiated decision. This ASR source has the same non-official-record limitation as U2. It supplies useful context, not an authoritative final outcome. A separate [UN Web TV programme, 1 July 2026](http[local research file] names Bengio and Ressa as scientific-panel co-chairs and describes independent scientific assessments; it does not give them treaty-making authority. Programme metadata inspected; video not watched.</p>\n<p>Priority missing record: actual final Co-Chairs&#x27; Summary and annexed submissions, especially any TFS/CeSIA/CHAI contribution, followed by the attribution/version trail. Root should treat this as a defined public-document access gap, not evidence of concealment or adoption.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-typed-relations-not-yet-canonical\">Candidate typed relations (not yet canonical)</h2>\n<p>IDs below are provisional within this note; match existing entity IDs before integration. Evidence status describes the source claim, not a finding of control. No graph edge should jump directly from campaign involvement to a state adopting rules.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate ID</th>\n<th>Direction and relation</th>\n<th>Date / action stage</th>\n<th>Source and limitation</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-01</td>\n<td>Maria Ressa → Global Call: publicly advocated</td>\n<td>2025-09-22 / prepared statement</td>\n<td>U1; named campaign</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-02</td>\n<td>Maria Ressa → UNGA80 anniversary session: presented policy demand</td>\n<td>2025-09-22 / submitted speech</td>\n<td>U1; not a resolution</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-03</td>\n<td>Yoshua Bengio → UNSC10005: advocated international AI red lines</td>\n<td>2025-09-24 / speech reported by ASR</td>\n<td>U2; official-record corroboration outstanding</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-04</td>\n<td>The Future Society → UNESCO-network red-lines subgroup: co-lead</td>\n<td>observed2026-09-09 / current listed role</td>\n<td>U3a; independent CSO work</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-05</td>\n<td>Ada Lovelace Institute → same subgroup: co-lead</td>\n<td>observed2026-09-09 / current listed role</td>\n<td>U3a</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-06</td>\n<td>CeSIA → same subgroup: member</td>\n<td>observed2026-09-09 / current listed role</td>\n<td>U3a; no control right inferred</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-07</td>\n<td>Tereza Zoumpalova → Global Call: organizer</td>\n<td>historical, observed2026-09-09</td>\n<td>U3b; UNESCO-hosted biography</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-08</td>\n<td>Tereza Zoumpalova → UNESCO network coordination group: named subgroup representative</td>\n<td>observed2026-09-09 / listed participation</td>\n<td>U3b; not UNESCO officer status</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-09</td>\n<td>ControlAI → Lord Hunt: acknowledged support</td>\n<td>2026-01-29 / support reported by recipient</td>\n<td>U4; modality/amount/briefing contents unknown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-10</td>\n<td>Lord Clement-Jones → Global Call: self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate</td>\n<td>2026-01-29 / delivered speech</td>\n<td>U4</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-11</td>\n<td>TFS and CeSIA → India AI Safety Connect workshop: co-organized</td>\n<td>2026-02 / organizer-reported event</td>\n<td>U5a; no state endorsement inferred</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>rl-policy-12</td>\n<td>Named officials in U5a → workshop: interventions reported</td>\n<td>2026-02 / organizer account</td>\n<td>U5a; preserve each person&#x27;s contemporaneous role</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>No adoption edge proposed for India, UNESCO, UK Government, UNGA, UNSC or Geneva based on this pass. No campaign-funding edge proposed from the UNESCO umbrella funding paragraph. A current institutional co-chair appointment is a separate governance relation, not evidence the appointment was caused by campaign participation.</p>\n<h2 id=\"causal-checks-and-stopping-boundary\">Causal checks and stopping boundary</h2>\n<p>The September2025 campaign cannot have caused the February2025 Paris summit, June2025 UNESCO umbrella-network launch, or earlier Seoul2024 commitments. Its organizers can have contributed to earlier processes in other capacities; that requires its own dated evidence. Hosting on OECD/UNESCO sites is not by itself institutional endorsement. Attendance and parliamentary speech are useful mechanisms of access, but do not establish agreed policy, government sponsorship, donor instruction, or exclusive access.</p>\n<p>Closed routes: UN Security Council official PDF202/empty → UN ASR substitute; UN Dialogue homepage/FAQ403 → indexed text and closing ASR only; UNESCO brochure public viewer → exact file401, parked; TFS/Hansard native403 → already-inspected web reader. No continued retries, authenticated sessions, or evasion. An initial Python terminal encoding error occurred after relevant India extraction; it did not invalidate bytes or the web-read annex.</p>\n<p>The strongest next acquisition is the actual briefing/transmission document at one conversion point: UNESCO subgroup to a government delegation, TFS/CeSIA workshop to India&#x27;s working group, or ControlAI to Hunt. These can distinguish policy influence from ordinary participation without enlarging the membership roster.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/policy-uptake.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-unesco-subgroup",
          "w8-red-s-unesco-coordination",
          "w8-red-s-unesco-network",
          "w8-red-s-ressa",
          "w8-red-s-bengio",
          "w8-red-s-india",
          "w8-red-s-india-declaration"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 2026-09-09. Bounded public-source inquiry; candidate findings only. No canonical-case edits, outreach, publication, or paid access. Scope: identifiable carriers, institutional venues, and the difference between receiving a demand and adopting it. Six evidence clusters follow. The result is documented access plus a continuing civil-society workstream, with no binding adoption of the campaign established by the records inspected here.\n\n## 1. Maria Ressa carried the named campaign into a UN General Assembly speech\n\n**U1 — UN-hosted prepared statement, 22 September 2025.** Speech for UN 80th Anniversary General Assembly (see source references) Maria A. Ressa. Read all four pages; decisive locator PDF page 3, “Three Solutions,” first solution. Ressa explicitly names the Global Call, says more than 200 people will launch it later that day, and asks governments to define international boundaries for unacceptable AI risks. This is a submitted/prepared speech on the UN's statement service, not a General Assembly resolution or proof every word was delivered. It supports a named public carrier and recipient venue. It does not establish an agreed UN position, a campaign drafting contract, or who obtained her speaking invitation.\n\nAcquisition: web PDF parser failed; ordinary public GET succeeded (HTTP 200), parsed in memory with pypdf. Original-byte SHA-256: `add56fc6bb85bf06b39a110e9aa8f3b49064859125287af9378df636a941e471`. Bytes were not retained because this lane was restricted to this note.\n\n## 2. Yoshua Bengio presented the red-lines initiative at the Security Council; the same meeting contained opposition\n\n**U2 — UN-hosted automatic transcript, Security Council meeting 10005, 24 September 2025.** Transcript (see source references) Scoped read of Bengio's intervention, especially the paragraph beginning “Earlier this week,” and the United States intervention. Bengio refers to the newly supported international red lines and calls for government visibility and control. The US speaker rejects international bodies asserting centralized AI governance. These are evidence of presentation and disagreement, not a Council decision or proof the US statement targeted this campaign specifically.\n\nThe service explicitly states its automatic transcripts are **not official records or official UN documents**. Its speaker labelling contains errors; use the original meeting catalogue to identify Bengio, not an automated label alone. Official catalogue S/PV.10005 (see source references) identifies the meeting and Bengio. The English official-record PDF was indexed but not fully acquired: web parser error, ordinary GET HTTP 202 with empty body. The automatic transcript was the bounded substitute. Hash of obtained transcript HTML: `9b6731f529a5f7ab53d673bffccac05409ac2e9db1a4eca7a0db79f51bb1fa34`.\n\n## 3. UNESCO hosts a continuing workstream with campaign organizers, under an express independence disclaimer\n\n**U3a — International AI Red Lines subgroup (see source references) current page, inspected 9 September 2026.** Full substantive page read. Locators: “Subgroup Activities,” “Subgroup Members,” and final disclaimer. The Future Society and Ada Lovelace Institute are co-leads; CeSIA is a member. The page describes a six-month research process and three workshops: New Delhi 18 February, Paris/UNESCO headquarters 26 February, and an Ada-organized virtual roundtable 16 March 2026. It distinguishes future explainer/discussion-paper outputs from a linked two-page brief. Activities are independent CSO/academic work and do not necessarily express UNESCO, member-state or partner views or commit UNESCO. This is an organizational seat and a work programme, not delegated rulemaking authority. HTML hash: `5f2d5268da959589a8352a9ec105dd614f3314acd443445db6dd39f11073df5c`.\n\n**U3b — Multi-Stakeholder Coordination Group (see source references) Scoped read of International AI Red Lines subgroup entries. UNESCO names Cami Rincon of Ada and Tereza Zoumpalova of TFS. The latter's entry identifies her as a Global Call organizer and leader of TFS's red-lines workstream. This connects an identifiable campaign organizer to the network's coordination structure. It does not specify personal veto, budget, or member-state approval rights. HTML hash: `9a142f15220a0ab3a8b3c4dd17ae3bfcf04697f3f573844e3f700b3c1a45630d`.\n\n**U3c — Umbrella network page (see source references) Read purpose, chronology, activities and funding paragraphs. The network launched in June 2025, before the September campaign; members shape its activities. UNESCO reports initial Patrick J. McGovern Foundation funding through its 2025 inclusive ethical-governance project, and an earlier UKRI-funded pilot. This concerns the umbrella network. It establishes neither a Global Call grant nor campaign-specific donor control. HTML hash: `532614bd3086d8a9d30339eadb688bf283a979577c435b67e95b2ce42da9b6f8`.\n\n**Output-access frontier:** the subgroup's visible Download PDF link resolves to UNESCO's SharePoint share (see source references) Public link GET returned viewer HTML; the exact file path exposed by that redirect (`CSO_Redlines_compressed.pdf`) returned HTTP 401. No authentication or bypass attempted; full brief uninspected. Its title/description are website evidence only. Missing decisive record: readable brief plus version/approval record and any transmission to a member-state delegation.\n\n## 4. The campaign reached a UK parliamentary demand; ControlAI support is separately acknowledged\n\n**U4 — Hansard, 29 January 2026 (see source references) “Superintelligent AI.”** Scoped read: Hunt opening at 3.03 pm, Clement-Jones at 3.42 pm, and opening ministerial response at 3.50 pm. Hunt thanks ControlAI for support. Clement-Jones says he joined the Global Call, promotes it, then separately describes ControlAI's UK proposals. He declares DLA Piper consultancy and APPG AI co-chairing. The minister, Baroness Lloyd of Effra, describes context-based regulation and AISI work without accepting a campaign treaty or moratorium in the inspected passage.\n\nThe earned mechanism is acknowledged NGO support and a signatory's explicit parliamentary advocacy. Support is not evidence of a payment, authorship of Hunt's speech, or government commissioning. Clement-Jones's interpretation of the call must not silently replace the campaign's own text. The minister's response is not a comprehensive proof of permanent rejection. Web reader content inspected; native GET returned403, so no original-HTML hash or retained bytes claimed. Needed: the actual briefing sent to Hunt/Clement-Jones, correspondence on requested wording, and any departmental response to the specific campaign proposal.\n\n## 5. India provides a matched access/outcome comparison\n\n**U5a — Organizer's account: TFS, Key Takeaways from the India AI Impact Summit (see source references) February 2026 event; publication date not independently established.** Read “Defining and Governing Unacceptable AI Risks” and “General Reflections.” TFS says it and CeSIA co-organized a session within AI Safety Connect Day, explicitly building on the campaign. It reports interventions from Denmark's tech ambassador Anne Marie Engtoft Meldgaard, Brazil foreign-ministry AI adviser Guilherme Fitzgibbon Alves Pereira, Japan AISI's Akiko Murakami, Singapore IMDA's Wan Sie Lee, and MEP Brando Benifei. This is named organizer-reported access, not independently confirmed government endorsement. Its own reflections call for moving beyond voluntary commitments. Web reader inspected; ordinary GET403; no captured-original hash claimed.\n\n**U5b — Government outcome: PIB/MeitY, New Delhi Declaration (see source references) Posted 21 February 2026; live page includes an endorsement list dated 5 March, so it is not an immutable launch-day snapshot. Full declaration annex read, especially “Secure and Trusted AI” and “Conclusion.” It supports industry-led voluntary measures and a voluntary, non-binding Trusted AI Commons; the conclusion likewise emphasizes voluntary/non-binding instruments. The declaration does not name this campaign or enact its requested internationally enforceable prohibitions. No drafting or transmission record links the side event to this text. HTML hash: `cf42f235597ee26c30934bd44d5c0e7b5f25dba4737595a7cec02fa09c98cab7`.\n\nNeeded to move from attendance to uptake: the workshop paper actually transmitted to the Safe and Trusted AI working group, recipient acknowledgment, tracked draft/declaration edits and decision record. Independent government priorities and pre-existing summit commitments remain adequate alternative explanations for shared language.\n\n## 6. Geneva: do not promote speeches or a summary into a negotiated agreement\n\n**U6a — UN Global Dialogue website (see source references) and FAQ (see source references) Indexed official-source text was inspected; direct web and ordinary GET access returned403. The homepage advertises a Co-Chairs' Summary for Geneva 6–7 July 2026. The FAQ says the Dialogue is not a negotiating forum and ends with a co-chair summary. **The summary itself was not acquired or read**, so no claim is made about whether it incorporates particular red-lines recommendations.\n\n**U6b — UN automatic closing-session transcript (see source references) Scoped review: final co-chair remarks (parsed lines1038–1053) and red-lines search matches. The co-chairs describe diverse views and a summary still to be drafted. The shared-red-lines passage at parsed lines915-918 is a stakeholder intervention, not a negotiated decision. This ASR source has the same non-official-record limitation as U2. It supplies useful context, not an authoritative final outcome. A separate UN Web TV programme, 1 July 2026 (see source references) names Bengio and Ressa as scientific-panel co-chairs and describes independent scientific assessments; it does not give them treaty-making authority. Programme metadata inspected; video not watched.\n\nPriority missing record: actual final Co-Chairs' Summary and annexed submissions, especially any TFS/CeSIA/CHAI contribution, followed by the attribution/version trail. Root should treat this as a defined public-document access gap, not evidence of concealment or adoption.\n\n## Candidate typed relations (not yet canonical)\n\nIDs below are provisional within this note; match existing entity IDs before integration. Evidence status describes the source claim, not a finding of control. No graph edge should jump directly from campaign involvement to a state adopting rules.\n\n| Candidate ID | Direction and relation | Date / action stage | Source and limitation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| rl-policy-01 | Maria Ressa → Global Call: publicly advocated | 2025-09-22 / prepared statement | U1; named campaign |\n| rl-policy-02 | Maria Ressa → UNGA80 anniversary session: presented policy demand | 2025-09-22 / submitted speech | U1; not a resolution |\n| rl-policy-03 | Yoshua Bengio → UNSC10005: advocated international AI red lines | 2025-09-24 / speech reported by ASR | U2; official-record corroboration outstanding |\n| rl-policy-04 | The Future Society → UNESCO-network red-lines subgroup: co-lead | observed2026-09-09 / current listed role | U3a; independent CSO work |\n| rl-policy-05 | Ada Lovelace Institute → same subgroup: co-lead | observed2026-09-09 / current listed role | U3a |\n| rl-policy-06 | CeSIA → same subgroup: member | observed2026-09-09 / current listed role | U3a; no control right inferred |\n| rl-policy-07 | Tereza Zoumpalova → Global Call: organizer | historical, observed2026-09-09 | U3b; UNESCO-hosted biography |\n| rl-policy-08 | Tereza Zoumpalova → UNESCO network coordination group: named subgroup representative | observed2026-09-09 / listed participation | U3b; not UNESCO officer status |\n| rl-policy-09 | ControlAI → Lord Hunt: acknowledged support | 2026-01-29 / support reported by recipient | U4; modality/amount/briefing contents unknown |\n| rl-policy-10 | Lord Clement-Jones → Global Call: self-reported signatory and parliamentary advocate | 2026-01-29 / delivered speech | U4 |\n| rl-policy-11 | TFS and CeSIA → India AI Safety Connect workshop: co-organized | 2026-02 / organizer-reported event | U5a; no state endorsement inferred |\n| rl-policy-12 | Named officials in U5a → workshop: interventions reported | 2026-02 / organizer account | U5a; preserve each person's contemporaneous role |\n\nNo adoption edge proposed for India, UNESCO, UK Government, UNGA, UNSC or Geneva based on this pass. No campaign-funding edge proposed from the UNESCO umbrella funding paragraph. A current institutional co-chair appointment is a separate governance relation, not evidence the appointment was caused by campaign participation.\n\n## Causal checks and stopping boundary\n\nThe September2025 campaign cannot have caused the February2025 Paris summit, June2025 UNESCO umbrella-network launch, or earlier Seoul2024 commitments. Its organizers can have contributed to earlier processes in other capacities; that requires its own dated evidence. Hosting on OECD/UNESCO sites is not by itself institutional endorsement. Attendance and parliamentary speech are useful mechanisms of access, but do not establish agreed policy, government sponsorship, donor instruction, or exclusive access.\n\nClosed routes: UN Security Council official PDF202/empty → UN ASR substitute; UN Dialogue homepage/FAQ403 → indexed text and closing ASR only; UNESCO brochure public viewer → exact file401, parked; TFS/Hansard native403 → already-inspected web reader. No continued retries, authenticated sessions, or evasion. An initial Python terminal encoding error occurred after relevant India extraction; it did not invalidate bytes or the web-read annex.\n\nThe strongest next acquisition is the actual briefing/transmission document at one conversion point: UNESCO subgroup to a government delegation, TFS/CeSIA workshop to India's working group, or ControlAI to Hunt. These can distinguish policy influence from ordinary participation without enlarging the membership roster.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-policy-uptake.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings",
        "title": "AI Red Lines: the operational structure",
        "description": "Research breakpoint observed 9 September 2026. This is a source-bounded synthesis of the completed first Red Lines wave. The user subsequently authorised unattended continuation; the follow-through lanes remain separate until reviewed. Canonical integration is case-r12; case-r11 and the earlier UK reader stay preserved.",
        "html": "<p>Research breakpoint observed 9 September 2026. This is a source-bounded synthesis of the completed first Red Lines wave. The user subsequently authorised unattended continuation; the follow-through lanes remain separate until reviewed. Canonical integration is case-r12; case-r11 and the earlier UK reader stay preserved.</p>\n<p>The useful change is that several lines now describe work performed. The campaign&#x27;s own [acknowledgements](http[local research file] identify Charbel-Raphael Segerie as initial drafter, Niki Iliadis and Tereza Zoumpalova as TFS project managers, and Anoush Rima Tatevossian as an adviser on UN engagement. Arthur Grimonpont approached Maria Ressa and coordinated the press conference. Apollo Strategic Communications is credited with preparing/moderating that conference. Miotti, Adam Shimi, ControlAI and FLI supplied feedback in different capacities. These are retrospective organizer credits; they establish a reported division of labour, not final approval rights or donor instructions. February/July references lack an explicit year.</p>\n<p>This matters to the Hubinger inquiry. The campaign [lists him as an individual signatory](http[local research file] while the acknowledgements identify Shimi as a contributor. The roles differ. Neither record establishes Hubinger as a campaign manager or an author of A Narrow Path. Kidron also appears on the signatory roster; roster inclusion alone is a weaker bridge than the policy presentation below.</p>\n<h2 id=\"resources-and-the-strategy-they-were-intended-to-support\">Resources and the strategy they were intended to support</h2>\n<p>Effektiv Spenden&#x27;s <a>H1/2024 disclosure</a>.</p>\n<p>The [SFF table](http[local research file] adds a second channel. It records a 2024 USD48,000 CeSIA recommendation, naming Tallinn as source and EffiSciences as receiving charity; TFS recommendations are USD97,000 in2024 and USD336,000 in2025. Its2023H2 TFS row names USD365,000 from FLI and USD11,000 from Tallinn. These are expressly recommendations for general support. Neither disbursement nor campaign restriction follows from a row in that table.</p>\n<p>CeSIA&#x27;s [diplomatic-sprint solicitation](http[local research file] is more specific about intended action. It seeks USD150,000 for early2026 work, estimates roughly USD400,000 for a year, and proposes combining lab-threshold harmonization with a champion-state/UN-resolution strategy. It anticipates that Anthropic and DeepMind would have competitive reasons to support common thresholds. That is the organizer&#x27;s stated incentive model, not proof of a deal with either company. Its fallback includes seeking externally imposed thresholds if labs decline harmonization.</p>\n<p>The same page reports a USD2million Longview recommendation dated9December2025, expressly unreceived when that passage was written. The update date is unknown. Manifund&#x27;s displayed USD0 only describes that platform. We cannot turn either statement into a current total of CeSIA funding, an executed award, or a Red Lines-restricted grant. APCO is listed among proposed advisers/partners; a paid lobbying contract has not been acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-broad-call-leaves-room-for-different-implementations\">A broad call leaves room for different implementations</h2>\n<p>In its [25September2025 article](http[local research file] ControlAI explicitly acknowledges that the general call leaves the particular red lines unspecified. It then promotes its preferred ASI prohibition and A Narrow Path. This is observable advocacy using a coalition&#x27;s common objective to advance a particular implementation. It does not show all signatories consented to that implementation, nor that partners hid their differences. CeSIA&#x27;s threshold-harmonization proposal supplies an independently articulated route within the same campaign environment.</p>\n<p>That suggests a useful working interpretation: a coalition assembles endorsements around a broad demand, while its participating organizations develop and promote more specific policy instruments. Coordination on the campaign is documented through attributed work. A single command centre, common final regime and donor editorial control remain separate hypotheses requiring different evidence.</p>\n<h2 id=\"institutional-channels-and-a-substantive-age-policy-bridge\">Institutional channels and a substantive age-policy bridge</h2>\n<p>The [UNESCO-hosted subgroup page](http[local research file] lists TFS and Ada Lovelace Institute as co-leads and CeSIA as a member. Tereza is named in its coordination structure. This supplies continuity beyond the launch. The page expressly says the independent CSO work does not commit UNESCO or member states. The umbrella network began inJune2025; its reported McGovern support and earlier UKRI-funded pilot must not be relabelled September campaign funding.</p>\n<p>The [Athens recap announcement](http[local research file] ties the4December2025 London event to the Global Call. Root retained the65-page original PDF and visually read pages2 and23. Page2 credits TFS organization, OECD/UNESCO partnership and support from Fathom, Arnold &amp; Porter, Cooperative AI Foundation and deliberAIde. Support form, amount, precise contracting entities and programme rights are undisclosed by those credits.</p>\n<p>Page23 reports 5Rights executive director Leanda Barrington-Leach advocating the UK&#x27;s Age Appropriate Design Code as a model for AI safety by design. This is a specific policy model being carried into the AI-governance forum. The same page separately attributes Greece&#x27;s kids-wallet age-verification example to Ambassador George Pagoulatos. Do not attribute his example to Leanda, infer that the Global Call demands it, or say age verification was absent from the event. Video links were extracted but the video was not watched; the organizer&#x27;s recap remains the source of the account.</p>\n<p>[Hansard](http[local research file] records Clement-Jones advocating the call and Hunt thanking ControlAI. A UN-hosted prepared Ressa speech names the campaign. Bengio&#x27;s Security Council intervention is available in a clearly non-official automatic transcript. These locate recipients and carriers. None is a resolution adopting the campaign. The government&#x27;s New Delhi declaration separately emphasises voluntary instruments; an event held alongside the summit is not itself a negotiated outcome.</p>\n<p>The independent review also distinguishes two Delhi events on18February2026: the UNESCO-network Global South roundtable and the TFS/CeSIA AI Safety Connect session. Date and city do not make them one workshop.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-next-records-that-could-change-the-interpretation\">The next records that could change the interpretation</h2>\n<p>The most valuable missing material sits at conversion points: the recommendation becoming an executed grant; organizer money becoming campaign expenditure; collaborative drafting becoming final approval; a public statement becoming a government submission; a submission becoming an accepted amendment. Recommendation letters, remittance schedules, restricted-fund ledgers, PR contracts, version history and briefing-transmission records have identifiable likely custodians. We have not established that every proposed agreement was executed or that every sought record exists in final form.</p>\n<p>The continued inquiry is testing later CeSIA financing disclosures, France/G7 outcomes against the organizer&#x27;s stated plan, and the Athens support layer. It does not reopen the closed UN/UNESCO access routes, Longview Drive acquisition or TFS scanned990 branch. No outreach, paid acquisition or public release has occurred. The broad geopolitical account remains the user&#x27;s attributed prior, not a verified conclusion of this case.</p>\n<p>Source custody: campaign-formation.md, organizer-funding.md and policy-uptake.md retain exact reading scopes; independent-review.md records the challenge. originals-manifest.json describes this wave&#x27;s additional captures. The Athens original is recorded separately in the canonical source with its SHA256; only two pages were visually inspected. A failed native release-PDF retrieval does not invalidate the earlier public-reader text, and no original bytes are claimed for that release.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reviewed-follow-through-integrated-into-case-r13\">Reviewed follow-through integrated into case-r13</h2>\n<p>Fathom is now resolved to the AI-governance nonprofit at fathom.org. Its current partnership page identifies TFS collaboration on verified redlines; the event history separately acknowledges financial support for the Athens series without allocating it to2025. CAIF&#x27;s own account adds reception hosting and a contribution advocating multi-agent monitoring. Its foundation page reports a USD15million Macroscopic commitment and lists a funder-associated trustee; this does not establish donor appointment rights or an event grant. deliberAIde&#x27;s provider-hosted TFS testimonial supports product use in the event/report workflow. The operator&#x27;s legal identity remains unresolved after a browser administrative-policy refusal. See athens-support-layer.md for exact sources and access scope.</p>\n<p>The France/G7 comparison distinguishes an institutional event programme from a completed briefing. The May29 official declaration commits to discussion of risk-framework comparability and also promotes AI openness and adoption; it does not adopt the specific coordinated-slowdown trigger sought in the CeSIA proposal. September targets remain within their target month at observation. Root securely captured the official five-page PDF and read page2; the policy worker read the complete text. See followthrough-france-g7.md and followthrough-review.md.</p>\n<p>The next promising instruments are the Fathom-sponsored California verification bill, the newer CAIF/ARIA/industry multi-agent-safety fund, and the G7 minors declaration. These remain acquisition leads. Striving is active through the hourly task heartbeat and current-work.md.</p>",
        "path": "red-lines-wave-2026-09-09/root-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w8-red-s-signatories",
          "w8-red-s-controlai",
          "w8-red-s-athens",
          "w8-red-s-athens-page"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research breakpoint observed 9 September 2026. This is a source-bounded synthesis of the completed first Red Lines wave. The user subsequently authorised unattended continuation; the follow-through lanes remain separate until reviewed. Canonical integration is case-r12; case-r11 and the earlier UK reader stay preserved.\n\nThe useful change is that several lines now describe work performed. The campaign's own acknowledgements (see source references) identify Charbel-Raphael Segerie as initial drafter, Niki Iliadis and Tereza Zoumpalova as TFS project managers, and Anoush Rima Tatevossian as an adviser on UN engagement. Arthur Grimonpont approached Maria Ressa and coordinated the press conference. Apollo Strategic Communications is credited with preparing/moderating that conference. Miotti, Adam Shimi, ControlAI and FLI supplied feedback in different capacities. These are retrospective organizer credits; they establish a reported division of labour, not final approval rights or donor instructions. February/July references lack an explicit year.\n\nThis matters to the Hubinger inquiry. The campaign lists him as an individual signatory (see source references) while the acknowledgements identify Shimi as a contributor. The roles differ. Neither record establishes Hubinger as a campaign manager or an author of A Narrow Path. Kidron also appears on the signatory roster; roster inclusion alone is a weaker bridge than the policy presentation below.\n\n## Resources and the strategy they were intended to support\n\nEffektiv Spenden's H1/2024 disclosure.\n\nThe SFF table (see source references) adds a second channel. It records a 2024 USD48,000 CeSIA recommendation, naming Tallinn as source and EffiSciences as receiving charity; TFS recommendations are USD97,000 in2024 and USD336,000 in2025. Its2023H2 TFS row names USD365,000 from FLI and USD11,000 from Tallinn. These are expressly recommendations for general support. Neither disbursement nor campaign restriction follows from a row in that table.\n\nCeSIA's diplomatic-sprint solicitation (see source references) is more specific about intended action. It seeks USD150,000 for early2026 work, estimates roughly USD400,000 for a year, and proposes combining lab-threshold harmonization with a champion-state/UN-resolution strategy. It anticipates that Anthropic and DeepMind would have competitive reasons to support common thresholds. That is the organizer's stated incentive model, not proof of a deal with either company. Its fallback includes seeking externally imposed thresholds if labs decline harmonization.\n\nThe same page reports a USD2million Longview recommendation dated9December2025, expressly unreceived when that passage was written. The update date is unknown. Manifund's displayed USD0 only describes that platform. We cannot turn either statement into a current total of CeSIA funding, an executed award, or a Red Lines-restricted grant. APCO is listed among proposed advisers/partners; a paid lobbying contract has not been acquired.\n\n## A broad call leaves room for different implementations\n\nIn its 25September2025 article (see source references) ControlAI explicitly acknowledges that the general call leaves the particular red lines unspecified. It then promotes its preferred ASI prohibition and A Narrow Path. This is observable advocacy using a coalition's common objective to advance a particular implementation. It does not show all signatories consented to that implementation, nor that partners hid their differences. CeSIA's threshold-harmonization proposal supplies an independently articulated route within the same campaign environment.\n\nThat suggests a useful working interpretation: a coalition assembles endorsements around a broad demand, while its participating organizations develop and promote more specific policy instruments. Coordination on the campaign is documented through attributed work. A single command centre, common final regime and donor editorial control remain separate hypotheses requiring different evidence.\n\n## Institutional channels and a substantive age-policy bridge\n\nThe UNESCO-hosted subgroup page (see source references) lists TFS and Ada Lovelace Institute as co-leads and CeSIA as a member. Tereza is named in its coordination structure. This supplies continuity beyond the launch. The page expressly says the independent CSO work does not commit UNESCO or member states. The umbrella network began inJune2025; its reported McGovern support and earlier UKRI-funded pilot must not be relabelled September campaign funding.\n\nThe Athens recap announcement (see source references) ties the4December2025 London event to the Global Call. Root retained the65-page original PDF and visually read pages2 and23. Page2 credits TFS organization, OECD/UNESCO partnership and support from Fathom, Arnold & Porter, Cooperative AI Foundation and deliberAIde. Support form, amount, precise contracting entities and programme rights are undisclosed by those credits.\n\nPage23 reports 5Rights executive director Leanda Barrington-Leach advocating the UK's Age Appropriate Design Code as a model for AI safety by design. This is a specific policy model being carried into the AI-governance forum. The same page separately attributes Greece's kids-wallet age-verification example to Ambassador George Pagoulatos. Do not attribute his example to Leanda, infer that the Global Call demands it, or say age verification was absent from the event. Video links were extracted but the video was not watched; the organizer's recap remains the source of the account.\n\nHansard (see source references) records Clement-Jones advocating the call and Hunt thanking ControlAI. A UN-hosted prepared Ressa speech names the campaign. Bengio's Security Council intervention is available in a clearly non-official automatic transcript. These locate recipients and carriers. None is a resolution adopting the campaign. The government's New Delhi declaration separately emphasises voluntary instruments; an event held alongside the summit is not itself a negotiated outcome.\n\nThe independent review also distinguishes two Delhi events on18February2026: the UNESCO-network Global South roundtable and the TFS/CeSIA AI Safety Connect session. Date and city do not make them one workshop.\n\n## The next records that could change the interpretation\n\nThe most valuable missing material sits at conversion points: the recommendation becoming an executed grant; organizer money becoming campaign expenditure; collaborative drafting becoming final approval; a public statement becoming a government submission; a submission becoming an accepted amendment. Recommendation letters, remittance schedules, restricted-fund ledgers, PR contracts, version history and briefing-transmission records have identifiable likely custodians. We have not established that every proposed agreement was executed or that every sought record exists in final form.\n\nThe continued inquiry is testing later CeSIA financing disclosures, France/G7 outcomes against the organizer's stated plan, and the Athens support layer. It does not reopen the closed UN/UNESCO access routes, Longview Drive acquisition or TFS scanned990 branch. No outreach, paid acquisition or public release has occurred. The broad geopolitical account remains the user's attributed prior, not a verified conclusion of this case.\n\nSource custody: campaign-formation.md, organizer-funding.md and policy-uptake.md retain exact reading scopes; independent-review.md records the challenge. originals-manifest.json describes this wave's additional captures. The Athens original is recorded separately in the canonical source with its SHA256; only two pages were visually inspected. A failed native release-PDF retrieval does not invalidate the earlier public-reader text, and no original bytes are claimed for that release.\n\n## Reviewed follow-through integrated into case-r13\n\nFathom is now resolved to the AI-governance nonprofit at fathom.org. Its current partnership page identifies TFS collaboration on verified redlines; the event history separately acknowledges financial support for the Athens series without allocating it to2025. CAIF's own account adds reception hosting and a contribution advocating multi-agent monitoring. Its foundation page reports a USD15million Macroscopic commitment and lists a funder-associated trustee; this does not establish donor appointment rights or an event grant. deliberAIde's provider-hosted TFS testimonial supports product use in the event/report workflow. The operator's legal identity remains unresolved after a browser administrative-policy refusal. See athens-support-layer.md for exact sources and access scope.\n\nThe France/G7 comparison distinguishes an institutional event programme from a completed briefing. The May29 official declaration commits to discussion of risk-framework comparability and also promotes AI openness and adoption; it does not adopt the specific coordinated-slowdown trigger sought in the CeSIA proposal. September targets remain within their target month at observation. Root securely captured the official five-page PDF and read page2; the policy worker read the complete text. See followthrough-france-g7.md and followthrough-review.md.\n\nThe next promising instruments are the Fathom-sponsored California verification bill, the newer CAIF/ARIA/industry multi-agent-safety fund, and the G7 minors declaration. These remain acquisition leads. Striving is active through the hourly task heartbeat and current-work.md.\n",
        "file": "research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-root-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings",
        "title": "Australia trial: objections, revisions and review authority",
        "description": "The missing public board sequence is now acquired. It documents responses, some changed procedures and limits. It also identifies a consequential boundary: Corby's declared exclusion covered testing and euCONSENT submission, while July minutes record his intention to review technical and vendor report sections. That is a question about the scope and operatio",
        "html": "<p>Nova · 8 September 2026 · Bounded wave w1-australia</p>\n<p>The missing public board sequence is now acquired. It documents responses, some changed procedures and retained limits. It also identifies a consequential boundary: Corby&#x27;s declared exclusion covered testing and euCONSENT submission, while July minutes record his intention to review technical and vendor report sections. That is a question about the scope and operation of the exclusion, not proof of its breach.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-newly-recovered-decision-trail\">The newly recovered decision trail</h2>\n<p><strong>March meeting.</strong> The published ten-page minutes record objections concerning children, sample diversity, safeguarding and circumvention, with actions to circulate the safeguarding policy and arrange expert follow-up. The document likely corresponds to DIGI&#x27;s March14 reference, but its cover says March13 and its body says Friday13February. Preserve those conflicting dates pending the meeting invitation or corrected record. [Original minutes, pp5–10](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>April29 response.</strong> The next minutes report follow-up correspondence, a completed mid-project impartiality report, an eSafety boundary MOU, and introduced vendor-selection criteria. Scout Insights clarifies that recruitment uses its registered panel, not employees/their children. Whether this corrected a misunderstanding or changed a plan remains unresolved. A request to record parent-child consent conflicts was kept outside scope. [Original minutes, PDF pp3–4 and9](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>June17 challenge continued.</strong> DIGI questioned the privacy comparison between independent providers and platform systems; participants challenged how practical testing would be described. The team reported all testing complete, while explaining that some technologies were assessed through documents/interviews. Minutes record a commitment to revisit wording. These are concerns and responses, not a unanimous endorsement. [Original minutes, pp5–7](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>July8 review access.</strong> SAB received A/B/K; vendors received extracts concerning their own systems. Detailed C–J sections remained unavailable to the board during legal review. Corby committed to review B–J for consistency. Vendor replies were sought by July18. This establishes differentiated review access and a recorded intention, not actual edits or a recusal breach. [Original minutes, pp3 and6–8](http[local research file] Its control header also has stale dates/meeting numbering, so use the explicit July8 body date with the discrepancy retained.</p>\n<p><strong>Final methodology account.</strong> Part B reports changes from stakeholder feedback, including usability clarification and more realistic circumvention scenarios; it preserves exclusions. It identifies minuted ethics meetings and eSafety comments under the MOU. The stakeholder-response table derives from prior minutes, so it is not independent corroboration of them. [Part B, B.14/B.17/B.18, PDF pp52–55,66–68,74](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-can-and-cannot-be-compared-beforeafter\">What can and cannot be compared before/after</h2>\n<p>The evaluation proposal is dated February6,2025. Its pp51–55 already describe usability and circumvention work with limits; this does not settle whether the planned coverage was adequate. Cover version0.3 conflicts with a history extending to version2.0. [Original proposal](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The human-subject protocol&#x27;s filename says V1.3, but its cover, approvals and revision history have inconsistent years. Its history describes collection-notice revisions. We have the documents and reported responses, not a clean approved-version comparison; no change is attributed specifically to DIGI without the intervening record. [Original DOCX](http[local research file]</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Evidence stage</th>\n<th>Current result</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Objections raised</td>\n<td>Original March, June and July minutes; retained DIGI letter.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Responses recorded</td>\n<td>April decisions/clarifications, follow-up email identified, final response table.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Safeguards said to operate</td>\n<td>MOU signed, selection criteria introduced, procedural/recruitment accounts.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Actual individual recusal operation</td>\n<td>Access/assignment/signoff and conflict-decision records not obtained.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Approved before/after protocol</td>\n<td>Public versions acquired, but inconsistent controls and missing intervening versions prevent reconstruction.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Independent outcome evidence</td>\n<td>No independent recusal audit acquired; raw testing data not reanalysed in this lane.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>DIGI&#x27;s April16 complaint remains an interested party&#x27;s contemporaneous representation. Its members faced regulation and some submitted trial technologies. AVPA representation and ACCS&#x27;s commercial certification interests remain on the other side of the analysis. Neither industry&#x27;s stake decides whose criticism is correct. [Retained letter, PDF pp10–13](http[local research file] [retained conflict-register source](http[local research file] The latter was read from the September7 capture, not refreshed in this wave.</p>\n<h2 id=\"procurement-evidence-upgraded-taxperimeter-gap-retained\">Procurement: evidence upgraded, tax/perimeter gap retained</h2>\n<p>An original departmental briefing now directly confirms contract CN4111198 at <strong>A$3,830,277</strong>, awarded November8,2024. It describes seven tenders and the department&#x27;s selection rationale. Locator: FOI26-145 Document12, SB25-000302 version02 dated September24,2025, PDF pp87–88 / printed9–10. This upgrades the old e15 award edge; it is the same procurement, not another transfer. [Official briefing](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The newly identified FOI26-176 search index exposes this row under a GST-inclusive value heading:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Contract</th>\n<th>Supplier as indexed</th>\n<th>Start</th>\n<th>End</th>\n<th>Indexed value</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>CN4111198</td>\n<td>AVID CERTIFICATION SERVICES LTD AGE CHECK CERTIFICATION SERVICES P/</td>\n<td>08-Nov-24</td>\n<td>30-Jun-25</td>\n<td>3,830,277.00</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>[Indexed official register](http[local research file] The full PDF failed retrieval, so this is still index-level tax/row evidence. The inspected briefing does not specify GST. No contract-payment total or consortium allocation is inferred; the broader A$6.5m programme envelope is a different quantity.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-custody-and-stopping-points\">Acquisition, custody and stopping points</h2>\n<p>The official publication index timed out in the web parser; one ordinary public GET succeeded and exposed the linked originals. Captured files are listed below. No private collaboration system was accessed.</p>\n<p>FOI26-154 returned a web error and its public GET timed out at35seconds. The independent FOI25-288 register copy returned a web error and timed out at15seconds. FOI26-176 exceeded the web tool&#x27;s14.25MB limit; one ordinary GET timed out at15seconds. Each route stopped. The original [AusTender entry](http[local research file] returned403 and was not retried. Its link came from TenderTracker; the aggregator&#x27;s inconsistent status and shifted dates were excluded.</p>\n<p>The obtained public record supports a useful correction: a generic “safeguards were merely declared and objections unanswered” account is too strong. There were recorded responses. It also does not establish adequate enforcement, a representative achieved sample, or that reviewers respected the operative boundary. Separate regulator input, vendor review, advisory challenge and final authorial control instead of collapsing them into one committee.</p>\n<p>The decisive next instruments are already identifiable. The secretariat/ACCS and Amanda Third hold the referenced follow-up correspondence; project leads hold approved revision history and task assignments. The ethics/impartiality function should hold the applicable exclusion decision and review signoffs. eSafety and project legal hold the signed MOU and draft comments. Scout Insights holds the recruitment specification and achieved-sample record. The department and AVID/ACCS hold CN4111198, variations and invoices. These are specific holder gaps, not evidence of refusal or concealed wrongdoing. No outreach occurred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"files-acquired\">Files acquired</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>File in this wave folder</th>\n<th>Extent</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-publications.html</td>\n<td>Original index inspected for links</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-march-minutes.pdf (+.txt)</td>\n<td>All10 pages read</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-april-minutes.pdf (+.txt)</td>\n<td>Selected pp3–6,9 read</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-june-minutes.pdf (+.txt)</td>\n<td>Selected pp3–7 passages read</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-july-minutes.pdf (+.txt)</td>\n<td>All8 pages read</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-evaluation-proposal.pdf (+.txt)</td>\n<td>88pages captured; selected control/method sections read</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-human-protocol-v1-3.docx (+.txt)</td>\n<td>Control, recruitment and collection-notice introduction read</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>australia-final-part-b.pdf (+.txt)</td>\n<td>138pages captured; selected governance, response, liaison and plan sections read</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Exact SHA-256 values, source locators, ancestry, failed routes and integration hints are in australia-candidate.json. Raw capture is not a claim of full substantive reading. The packet contains four new nodes, seven relationships, one proposed evidence upgrade to e15, and four parked holder-record leads. Alias retained source records by URL; do not double-count the same source, contract or derivative response table.</p>\n<p>No canonical case, explorer, automation or other campaign file was changed.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/australia-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-a61d78086a00",
          "src-81bf267f91d0",
          "w1-australia-src-publications",
          "w1-australia-src-march-minutes",
          "w1-australia-src-april-minutes",
          "w1-australia-src-june-minutes",
          "w1-australia-src-july-minutes",
          "w1-australia-src-evaluation",
          "w1-australia-src-human-protocol",
          "w1-australia-src-final-responses",
          "w1-australia-src-procurement-brief",
          "w1-australia-src-gst-register",
          "w1-australia-src-foi26154-failed",
          "w1-australia-src-foi25288-failed",
          "w1-australia-src-austender-failed"
        ],
        "markdown": "Nova · 8 September 2026 · Bounded wave w1-australia\n\nThe missing public board sequence is now acquired. It documents responses, some changed procedures and retained limits. It also identifies a consequential boundary: Corby's declared exclusion covered testing and euCONSENT submission, while July minutes record his intention to review technical and vendor report sections. That is a question about the scope and operation of the exclusion, not proof of its breach.\n\n## The newly recovered decision trail\n\n**March meeting.** The published ten-page minutes record objections concerning children, sample diversity, safeguarding and circumvention, with actions to circulate the safeguarding policy and arrange expert follow-up. The document likely corresponds to DIGI's March14 reference, but its cover says March13 and its body says Friday13February. Preserve those conflicting dates pending the meeting invitation or corrected record. Original minutes, pp5–10 (see source references)\n\n**April29 response.** The next minutes report follow-up correspondence, a completed mid-project impartiality report, an eSafety boundary MOU, and introduced vendor-selection criteria. Scout Insights clarifies that recruitment uses its registered panel, not employees/their children. Whether this corrected a misunderstanding or changed a plan remains unresolved. A request to record parent-child consent conflicts was kept outside scope. Original minutes, PDF pp3–4 and9 (see source references)\n\n**June17 challenge continued.** DIGI questioned the privacy comparison between independent providers and platform systems; participants challenged how practical testing would be described. The team reported all testing complete, while explaining that some technologies were assessed through documents/interviews. Minutes record a commitment to revisit wording. These are concerns and responses, not a unanimous endorsement. Original minutes, pp5–7 (see source references)\n\n**July8 review access.** SAB received A/B/K; vendors received extracts concerning their own systems. Detailed C–J sections remained unavailable to the board during legal review. Corby committed to review B–J for consistency. Vendor replies were sought by July18. This establishes differentiated review access and a recorded intention, not actual edits or a recusal breach. Original minutes, pp3 and6–8 (see source references) Its control header also has stale dates/meeting numbering, so use the explicit July8 body date with the discrepancy retained.\n\n**Final methodology account.** Part B reports changes from stakeholder feedback, including usability clarification and more realistic circumvention scenarios; it preserves exclusions. It identifies minuted ethics meetings and eSafety comments under the MOU. The stakeholder-response table derives from prior minutes, so it is not independent corroboration of them. Part B, B.14/B.17/B.18, PDF pp52–55,66–68,74 (see source references)\n\n## What can and cannot be compared before/after\n\nThe evaluation proposal is dated February6,2025. Its pp51–55 already describe usability and circumvention work with limits; this does not settle whether the planned coverage was adequate. Cover version0.3 conflicts with a history extending to version2.0. Original proposal (see source references)\n\nThe human-subject protocol's filename says V1.3, but its cover, approvals and revision history have inconsistent years. Its history describes collection-notice revisions. We have the documents and reported responses, not a clean approved-version comparison; no change is attributed specifically to DIGI without the intervening record. Original DOCX (see source references)\n\n| Evidence stage | Current result |\n| --- | --- |\n| Objections raised | Original March, June and July minutes; retained DIGI letter. |\n| Responses recorded | April decisions/clarifications, follow-up email identified, final response table. |\n| Safeguards said to operate | MOU signed, selection criteria introduced, procedural/recruitment accounts. |\n| Actual individual recusal operation | Access/assignment/signoff and conflict-decision records not obtained. |\n| Approved before/after protocol | Public versions acquired, but inconsistent controls and missing intervening versions prevent reconstruction. |\n| Independent outcome evidence | No independent recusal audit acquired; raw testing data not reanalysed in this lane. |\n\nDIGI's April16 complaint remains an interested party's contemporaneous representation. Its members faced regulation and some submitted trial technologies. AVPA representation and ACCS's commercial certification interests remain on the other side of the analysis. Neither industry's stake decides whose criticism is correct. Retained letter, PDF pp10–13 (see source references) retained conflict-register source (see source references) The latter was read from the September7 capture, not refreshed in this wave.\n\n## Procurement: evidence upgraded, tax/perimeter gap retained\n\nAn original departmental briefing now directly confirms contract CN4111198 at **A$3,830,277**, awarded November8,2024. It describes seven tenders and the department's selection rationale. Locator: FOI26-145 Document12, SB25-000302 version02 dated September24,2025, PDF pp87–88 / printed9–10. This upgrades the old e15 award edge; it is the same procurement, not another transfer. Official briefing (see source references)\n\nThe newly identified FOI26-176 search index exposes this row under a GST-inclusive value heading:\n\n| Contract | Supplier as indexed | Start | End | Indexed value |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| CN4111198 | AVID CERTIFICATION SERVICES LTD AGE CHECK CERTIFICATION SERVICES P/ | 08-Nov-24 | 30-Jun-25 | 3,830,277.00 |\n\nIndexed official register (see source references) The full PDF failed retrieval, so this is still index-level tax/row evidence. The inspected briefing does not specify GST. No contract-payment total or consortium allocation is inferred; the broader A$6.5m programme envelope is a different quantity.\n\n## Acquisition, custody and stopping points\n\nThe official publication index timed out in the web parser; one ordinary public GET succeeded and exposed the linked originals. Captured files are listed below. No private collaboration system was accessed.\n\nFOI26-154 returned a web error and its public GET timed out at35seconds. The independent FOI25-288 register copy returned a web error and timed out at15seconds. FOI26-176 exceeded the web tool's14.25MB limit; one ordinary GET timed out at15seconds. Each route stopped. The original AusTender entry (see source references) returned403 and was not retried. Its link came from TenderTracker; the aggregator's inconsistent status and shifted dates were excluded.\n\nThe obtained public record supports a useful correction: a generic “safeguards were merely declared and objections unanswered” account is too strong. There were recorded responses. It also does not establish adequate enforcement, a representative achieved sample, or that reviewers respected the operative boundary. Separate regulator input, vendor review, advisory challenge and final authorial control instead of collapsing them into one committee.\n\nThe decisive next instruments are already identifiable. The secretariat/ACCS and Amanda Third hold the referenced follow-up correspondence; project leads hold approved revision history and task assignments. The ethics/impartiality function should hold the applicable exclusion decision and review signoffs. eSafety and project legal hold the signed MOU and draft comments. Scout Insights holds the recruitment specification and achieved-sample record. The department and AVID/ACCS hold CN4111198, variations and invoices. These are specific holder gaps, not evidence of refusal or concealed wrongdoing. No outreach occurred.\n\n## Files acquired\n\n| File in this wave folder | Extent |\n| --- | --- |\n| australia-publications.html | Original index inspected for links |\n| australia-march-minutes.pdf (+.txt) | All10 pages read |\n| australia-april-minutes.pdf (+.txt) | Selected pp3–6,9 read |\n| australia-june-minutes.pdf (+.txt) | Selected pp3–7 passages read |\n| australia-july-minutes.pdf (+.txt) | All8 pages read |\n| australia-evaluation-proposal.pdf (+.txt) | 88pages captured; selected control/method sections read |\n| australia-human-protocol-v1-3.docx (+.txt) | Control, recruitment and collection-notice introduction read |\n| australia-final-part-b.pdf (+.txt) | 138pages captured; selected governance, response, liaison and plan sections read |\n\nExact SHA-256 values, source locators, ancestry, failed routes and integration hints are in australia-candidate.json. Raw capture is not a claim of full substantive reading. The packet contains four new nodes, seven relationships, one proposed evidence upgrade to e15, and four parked holder-record leads. Alias retained source records by URL; do not double-count the same source, contract or derivative response table.\n\nNo canonical case, explorer, automation or other campaign file was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-australia-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope",
        "title": "Baseline evidence custody",
        "description": "The reviewed atlas and every original node/relationship field were in case-r1.json and atlas-baseline-original.json. This import does not reopen or newly inspect the 117 cited URLs. Sources initially use discovered because their individual historical reading scopes are not all reconciled here. Existing evidence_class and review_scope fields, titles, qualifie",
        "html": "<p>The reviewed atlas and every original node/relationship field were retained in case-r1.json and atlas-baseline-original.json. This import does not reopen or newly inspect the 117 cited URLs. Sources initially use discovered because their individual historical reading scopes are not all reconciled here. Existing evidence_class and review_scope fields, titles, qualifiers and source objects remain beside the converted records. Later source-specific inspections must record the actual scope and location without claiming full-corpus freshness. Historical is temporal; each proposal record has an explicitly staged verb. No effective interval was invented from an observation date.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/baseline-evidence-scope.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-477c83c16019",
          "src-b7bb716eacc0",
          "src-c401141d51b7",
          "src-b9795844a727",
          "src-24fdb5685974",
          "src-44c03bd0a530",
          "src-82c15a7cd2b7",
          "src-547a5b3ea786",
          "src-c5c76c4cf21e",
          "src-bad5f974d0c4",
          "src-d17247535809",
          "src-ef55ca30efaa",
          "src-a82329c94eac",
          "src-aaae21f08c81",
          "src-f762980e9c03",
          "src-ef8d4d859fc2",
          "src-73e997a6d1ef",
          "src-71475aa32b34",
          "src-95a63bfefeca",
          "src-d7fd807078d3",
          "src-0d707744efd9",
          "src-b8a63a1347f2",
          "src-94263f452256",
          "src-d451e2202e83",
          "src-033fd1e2f487",
          "src-4711920c1730",
          "src-cf6c0895df42",
          "src-29f8a10f712c",
          "src-8016e12c6894",
          "src-0764ac1a884e",
          "src-1a8f761e951d",
          "src-e07be722d815",
          "src-2ed7c939cd31",
          "src-1d6bd7e4b8fa",
          "src-6a9425acbb0c",
          "src-23397b6fa896",
          "src-a96ee8404df0",
          "src-1b802ead5bff",
          "src-e7bf79d5bdc8",
          "src-42725da209c6",
          "src-8638b6bbbdfc",
          "src-f40ef2b0252e",
          "src-e996011534a6",
          "src-604eca7e0531",
          "src-eb7a62848703",
          "src-22304018d7f5",
          "src-f4fef5547775",
          "src-b2d0264369e7",
          "src-5747555ff9d7",
          "src-9982667e53da",
          "src-b6e607a7fd65",
          "src-1bdb2fcb24d8",
          "src-8efa5883d584",
          "src-a69f9d4e2a03",
          "src-210ecbb4dfbb",
          "src-11e9bb8515f1",
          "src-7f2794f6a070",
          "src-4fe7b92dcece",
          "src-5e4e930cec53",
          "src-dc138c91500c",
          "src-1bc441d0528b",
          "src-dbb8d89ffb52",
          "src-6dbd58c5e8f8",
          "src-8e230246a046",
          "src-c7e428b699d3",
          "src-3db31f719414",
          "src-0f5ce69a6784",
          "src-8806cf368b7f",
          "src-9d9e4fbe80b2",
          "src-90f14526fca6",
          "src-478c52027034",
          "src-81ff54e1c713",
          "src-1e184fdc4ff9",
          "src-1f9134b8bbcc",
          "src-33a85b0bc3bd",
          "src-421fa29c369c",
          "src-c2da4caaaa8e",
          "src-953ce6b745ed",
          "src-2af30dede1cb",
          "src-50b299128d80",
          "src-5c7f3011d794",
          "src-1f84b8a8e5b4",
          "src-9537facf4ef2",
          "src-ac43e1b525d3",
          "src-4cc57af3ad93",
          "src-b4a2b9e3261c",
          "src-ed3d2ac6a354",
          "src-6df46b543f84",
          "src-7e9b476e322d",
          "src-685569dc8514",
          "src-27738cfd6708",
          "src-808a0af999fb",
          "src-cda852240051",
          "src-306689bfa358",
          "src-9e1956e1c0db",
          "src-3bc8f45060eb",
          "src-718684d59ccd",
          "src-767c5b45b782",
          "src-b1a700934b28",
          "src-f3950ad6f80e",
          "src-14c9e7f34568",
          "src-2615708ffd63"
        ],
        "markdown": "The reviewed atlas and every original node/relationship field were retained in case-r1.json and atlas-baseline-original.json. This import does not reopen or newly inspect the 117 cited URLs. Sources initially use discovered because their individual historical reading scopes are not all reconciled here. Existing evidence_class and review_scope fields, titles, qualifiers and source objects remain beside the converted records. Later source-specific inspections must record the actual scope and location without claiming full-corpus freshness. Historical is temporal; each proposal record has an explicitly staged verb. No effective interval was invented from an observation date.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-baseline-evidence-scope.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings",
        "title": "ControlAI acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
        "description": "This bounded pass recovered a new original US tax return and read the UK company's filed decision rules. It did not identify the US related-party creditor or resolve the UK combined accrual/deferred-income balance. No outreach, paid access or canonical-map edits were undertaken. Facts below distinguish a party's official filing from independent verification ",
        "html": "<p>This bounded pass recovered a new original US tax return and read the UK company&#x27;s filed decision rules. It did not identify the US related-party creditor or resolve the UK combined accrual/deferred-income balance. No outreach, paid access or canonical-map edits were undertaken. Facts below distinguish a party&#x27;s official filing from independent verification of its substance.</p>\n<h2 id=\"new-original-us-financial-obligation\">New original US financial obligation</h2>\n<p>The IRS official [2026 XML index](http[local research file] selects EIN <strong>33-3361748, CONTROL AI US INC</strong>, tax period 202512, return 990EZ, object<strong>202611749349201056</strong>, batch<strong>2026_TEOS_XML_06A</strong>. The original member <code>202611749349201056_public.xml</code> was recovered from the [official IRS ZIP](http[local research file] using ordinary public byte-range requests. This is a new custodian route; earlier failed third-party original-return endpoints were not repeated.</p>\n<p>The return covers <strong>4 February–31 December 2025</strong>, uses accrual accounting, marks itself initial, and was signed by Andrea Miotti on <strong>23 June 2026</strong>. It reports $136,570 contributions, $377 bank-fee refunds, total revenue $136,947, expenses $93,682, assets $69,178, liabilities $25,913 and net assets $43,265. These totals were previously available through a secondary listing; they now have original-return support.</p>\n<p>The consequential new detail is <strong>Schedule O, Form 990-EZ Part II line 26</strong>. Exact filed excerpt: <code>DESCRIPTION: DUE TO RELATED ORGANIZATION. BEG. OF YEAR AMOUNT: 0. END OF YEAR AMOUNT: 20,955.</code> The same line separately reports <strong>$4,958 accounts payable and accrued expenses</strong>. The two liabilities sum to $25,913. This is a balance owed as of 31 December 2025, not a disclosed cash payment, annual grant or loan commitment.</p>\n<p><strong>The creditor is unnamed.</strong> The released XML does not say whether this is a shared-cost reimbursement, loan/advance or other related-party accrual. No UK-to-US funding edge is earned. An actual relationship of obligation is now evidenced by the filing, while its identity and conditions remain unresolved. The return also records $3,008 currency gains/losses and $3,180 research/production costs, but these do not identify a country, donor or creditor.</p>\n<p>Miotti is the filed <strong>President, Treasurer and Secretary</strong>, the officer signatory and named books custodian. The officer schedule reports 6 hours/week, zero compensation, benefits and allowances. This is a 2025-period declaration and does not erase later officers or establish that he performed every operational approval. Gelman Rosenberg &amp; Freedman is the paid preparer firm and Elizabeth W Heller the named preparer; that does not make this an audited return.</p>\n<p>Schedule B contains <code>RESTRICTED</code> placeholders for contributor number, name, address and amount. It yields neither donor names nor a defensible donor count. The controlled-entity answer is negative but is a narrower question than the related-organisation liability; those statements are not contradictory on their face. Political-campaign answers cannot be recast as proof of no lobbying.</p>\n<p><strong>Preserved original:</strong> <code>w1-controlai-us-2025.xml</code>,9,572 bytes, SHA256<code>5ef05de70e7b197cd5272c885477f73edfae997a5e9a2b3cd4dfe1470c3f649e</code>. <code>w1-controlai-us-2025-selection-receipt.json</code> preserves the exact CSV row, object/member, URL, byte ranges, CRC and retrieval time. XML content consists of the main 990-EZ and SchedulesB/O; no binary attachments are declared. Exact finance locators are IRS990EZ balance groups and IRS990Schedule O SupplementalInformationDetail; officer locators are ReturnHeader/BusinessOfficerGrp and IRS990EZ/OfficerDirectorTrusteeEmplGrp.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is the creditor ledger entry and underlying balance confirmation/invoice/agreement, then its clearing entry. Control AI US is the custodian; the filed books contact is Miotti, and the preparer may hold workpapers. These are private records. A later public return could reveal a remaining balance without naming the creditor; that is a reopening trigger, not a promise of public donor identification.</p>\n<h2 id=\"new-uk-formal-authority-record\">New UK formal-authority record</h2>\n<p>The [Companies House articles](http[local research file] were filed <strong>20 March 2024</strong>; their cover has a 15March 2024 stamp. This pass does not establish a separate effective-adoption date. Original image-only PDF retained as <code>w1-controlai-uk-articles-2024.pdf</code> (710,846 bytes; SHA256<code>b81271a477b7fe2d4c56c0726c304153733f85489b3859eaf3067bac7bb98977</code>). Selected relevant pages were rendered and visually read after text extraction returned blank. One-based PDF page numbers below avoid the document&#x27;s later repeated printed numbering.</p>\n<p>The articles call <strong>Secure Future Research Ltd</strong> the Foundation and define a Trustee as its company director (Schedule 1, PDF p 20). These are drafting terms for the existing company, not evidence of a second foundation or hidden board. Article 19.1 makes the directors the <strong>only legal members</strong>, and Article 17.2 allows the board to appoint directors (PDF pp 12–13). Article 7 assigns management and powers to the directors; Article 8 allows delegation, including further delegation if permitted, and lets the directors alter or terminate it. <strong>Article 8.4 requires committee expenditure/liabilities to be board-authorized or within a board-approved budget</strong> (PDF p 8).</p>\n<p>Decisions are collective under Article 11; Article 13 provides minimum quorum two and, where the chair is eligible, a casting vote; Article 14 provides majority decisions without a meeting (PDF pp 9–10). This is the formal decision framework, not proof of who was chair or how a particular approval occurred. Conflict rules include disclosure, potential-conflict participation subject to specified exceptions, and exclusion in the benefit cases covered by Article 15.5 (PDF pp 10–12); no conflict breach is alleged here.</p>\n<p>The purposes/powers allow accepting or disclaiming gifts, supporting other organisations and advocacy within the stated charitable limits (Articles 1–2, PDF pp 3–5). This permits relevant operating forms but proves no particular transfer. The charitable drafting does not independently establish registered-charity status.</p>\n<p><strong>Article 27 requires minutes</strong> of officer appointments, all company/board resolutions including decisions without meetings, and proceedings of board/company/committee meetings. Article 28 provides for accounting and company records (PDF p 17). This makes resolutions, delegation terms and budget authority a specific expected record family with Secure Future Research as custodian; actual existence/compliance and public availability remain unproved. No donor veto or external appointment power was identified in the inspected governance provisions. Grant agreements could nevertheless create contractual constraints and must be checked separately.</p>\n<h2 id=\"uk-accounting-question-still-open\">UK accounting question still open</h2>\n<p>The [current filing history](http[local research file] still lists 21August 2026 accounts to 31December 2025 as the latest financial filing. The retained [original XHTML](http[local research file] is unaudited, filleted micro-entity reporting under FRS105, with income/expenditure not publicly delivered under section 444(5A). It records <strong>£7,596,691 accruals and deferred income combined</strong>. No new breakdown or fuller replacement was found. The line is not all established donor advances, spendable cash or yearly expenditure.</p>\n<p>The needed records are the year-end combined-line reconciliation, deferred-income/restricted-grant schedules and underlying grant agreements, with the full approved accounts and board decisions. Custodians are the company and its finance/board/accountant. Reopen on fuller approved accounts, a named grant disclosure or agreement; repeated identical public filing requests will not create the omitted schedule.</p>\n<h2 id=\"german-declarations-refreshed-no-new-payment-figures\">German declarations refreshed, no new payment figures</h2>\n<p>Both [ControlAI US R007795 v 3](http[local research file] and [Amir Benjamin Balde R007864 v 2](http[local research file] returned original JSON 200 and were saved as <code>w1-controlai-german-us-entry.json</code> and <code>w1-controlai-german-balde-entry.json</code>. Their substantive versions remain 16March 2026. ControlAI lists Miotti and lobbying operated through a third party; Balde declares ControlAI US as client for AI-risk political education and contacts with MPs, parliamentary staff and officials. This refreshes an already retained commissioned-lobbying relation.</p>\n<p>Balde&#x27;s zero financial figures refer to <strong>calendar 2025</strong>; they do not show whether 2026 lobbying was paid. ControlAI&#x27;s register finance declarations still say no completed fiscal year. The newly acquired US return provides a completed 2025 tax period and was signed later, inJune. These are different dated filings; this pass does not infer a false statement or legal reporting breach. No new donor names,2026 compensation or contract terms were obtained.</p>\n<h2 id=\"route-closure-and-rival-impact\">Route closure and rival impact</h2>\n<p>The US-original-return gap is closed by a precise new IRS route. The related-party counterparty question replaces a generic suspicion of cross-border funding with a traceable balance; autonomy with cost sharing, internal advance financing and externally conditioned funding remain distinguishable rivals. UK constitutional authority is now located, but exercised approval and any external covenant remain to be acquired. German official refresh is complete and does not answer 2026 payment. Earlier CauseIQ/ProPublica and US lobbying portal failures were not reopened. The Companies House web-tool fetch failed on an expired cached signed URL; direct ordinary PowerShell succeeded. Image-only PDF extraction was replaced once with visual inspection. No failed endpoint was hammered.</p>\n<p>Candidate graph records are in <code>controlai-candidate.json</code>, with all new IDs prefixed<code>w1-controlai</code>. Keep the related-organisation endpoint visibly unresolved and do not collapse it into Secure Future Research. No historical-job-to-government-funding, CASIR-draft-to-award, preparer-to-auditor, payable-to-paid, or restricted-placeholder-to-donor-count inference is supported.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/controlai-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w1-controlai-s-us-return",
          "w1-controlai-s-us-index",
          "w1-controlai-s-uk-articles",
          "w1-controlai-s-uk-history",
          "w1-controlai-s-uk-accounts",
          "w1-controlai-s-german-us",
          "w1-controlai-s-german-balde"
        ],
        "markdown": "This bounded pass recovered a new original US tax return and read the UK company's filed decision rules. It did not identify the US related-party creditor or resolve the UK combined accrual/deferred-income balance. No outreach, paid access or canonical-map edits were undertaken. Facts below distinguish a party's official filing from independent verification of its substance.\n\n## New original US financial obligation\n\nThe IRS official 2026 XML index (see source references) selects EIN **33-3361748, CONTROL AI US INC**, tax period 202512, return 990EZ, object**202611749349201056**, batch**2026_TEOS_XML_06A**. The original member `202611749349201056_public.xml` was recovered from the official IRS ZIP (see source references) using ordinary public byte-range requests. This is a new custodian route; earlier failed third-party original-return endpoints were not repeated.\n\nThe return covers **4 February–31 December 2025**, uses accrual accounting, marks itself initial, and was signed by Andrea Miotti on **23 June 2026**. It reports $136,570 contributions, $377 bank-fee refunds, total revenue $136,947, expenses $93,682, assets $69,178, liabilities $25,913 and net assets $43,265. These totals were previously available through a secondary listing; they now have original-return support.\n\nThe consequential new detail is **Schedule O, Form 990-EZ Part II line 26**. Exact filed excerpt: `DESCRIPTION: DUE TO RELATED ORGANIZATION. BEG. OF YEAR AMOUNT: 0. END OF YEAR AMOUNT: 20,955.` The same line separately reports **$4,958 accounts payable and accrued expenses**. The two liabilities sum to $25,913. This is a balance owed as of 31 December 2025, not a disclosed cash payment, annual grant or loan commitment.\n\n**The creditor is unnamed.** The released XML does not say whether this is a shared-cost reimbursement, loan/advance or other related-party accrual. No UK-to-US funding edge is earned. An actual relationship of obligation is now evidenced by the filing, while its identity and conditions remain unresolved. The return also records $3,008 currency gains/losses and $3,180 research/production costs, but these do not identify a country, donor or creditor.\n\nMiotti is the filed **President, Treasurer and Secretary**, the officer signatory and named books custodian. The officer schedule reports 6 hours/week, zero compensation, benefits and allowances. This is a 2025-period declaration and does not erase later officers or establish that he performed every operational approval. Gelman Rosenberg & Freedman is the paid preparer firm and Elizabeth W Heller the named preparer; that does not make this an audited return.\n\nSchedule B contains `RESTRICTED` placeholders for contributor number, name, address and amount. It yields neither donor names nor a defensible donor count. The controlled-entity answer is negative but is a narrower question than the related-organisation liability; those statements are not contradictory on their face. Political-campaign answers cannot be recast as proof of no lobbying.\n\n**Preserved original:** `w1-controlai-us-2025.xml`,9,572 bytes, SHA256`5ef05de70e7b197cd5272c885477f73edfae997a5e9a2b3cd4dfe1470c3f649e`. `w1-controlai-us-2025-selection-receipt.json` preserves the exact CSV row, object/member, URL, byte ranges, CRC and retrieval time. XML content consists of the main 990-EZ and SchedulesB/O; no binary attachments are declared. Exact finance locators are IRS990EZ balance groups and IRS990Schedule O SupplementalInformationDetail; officer locators are ReturnHeader/BusinessOfficerGrp and IRS990EZ/OfficerDirectorTrusteeEmplGrp.\n\nThe next discriminating record is the creditor ledger entry and underlying balance confirmation/invoice/agreement, then its clearing entry. Control AI US is the custodian; the filed books contact is Miotti, and the preparer may hold workpapers. These are private records. A later public return could reveal a remaining balance without naming the creditor; that is a reopening trigger, not a promise of public donor identification.\n\n## New UK formal-authority record\n\nThe Companies House articles (see source references) were filed **20 March 2024**; their cover has a 15March 2024 stamp. This pass does not establish a separate effective-adoption date. Original image-only PDF retained as `w1-controlai-uk-articles-2024.pdf` (710,846 bytes; SHA256`b81271a477b7fe2d4c56c0726c304153733f85489b3859eaf3067bac7bb98977`). Selected relevant pages were rendered and visually read after text extraction returned blank. One-based PDF page numbers below avoid the document's later repeated printed numbering.\n\nThe articles call **Secure Future Research Ltd** the Foundation and define a Trustee as its company director (Schedule 1, PDF p 20). These are drafting terms for the existing company, not evidence of a second foundation or hidden board. Article 19.1 makes the directors the **only legal members**, and Article 17.2 allows the board to appoint directors (PDF pp 12–13). Article 7 assigns management and powers to the directors; Article 8 allows delegation, including further delegation if permitted, and lets the directors alter or terminate it. **Article 8.4 requires committee expenditure/liabilities to be board-authorized or within a board-approved budget** (PDF p 8).\n\nDecisions are collective under Article 11; Article 13 provides minimum quorum two and, where the chair is eligible, a casting vote; Article 14 provides majority decisions without a meeting (PDF pp 9–10). This is the formal decision framework, not proof of who was chair or how a particular approval occurred. Conflict rules include disclosure, potential-conflict participation subject to specified exceptions, and exclusion in the benefit cases covered by Article 15.5 (PDF pp 10–12); no conflict breach is alleged here.\n\nThe purposes/powers allow accepting or disclaiming gifts, supporting other organisations and advocacy within the stated charitable limits (Articles 1–2, PDF pp 3–5). This permits relevant operating forms but proves no particular transfer. The charitable drafting does not independently establish registered-charity status.\n\n**Article 27 requires minutes** of officer appointments, all company/board resolutions including decisions without meetings, and proceedings of board/company/committee meetings. Article 28 provides for accounting and company records (PDF p 17). This makes resolutions, delegation terms and budget authority a specific expected record family with Secure Future Research as custodian; actual existence/compliance and public availability remain unproved. No donor veto or external appointment power was identified in the inspected governance provisions. Grant agreements could nevertheless create contractual constraints and must be checked separately.\n\n## UK accounting question still open\n\nThe current filing history (see source references) still lists 21August 2026 accounts to 31December 2025 as the latest financial filing. The retained original XHTML (see source references) is unaudited, filleted micro-entity reporting under FRS105, with income/expenditure not publicly delivered under section 444(5A). It records **£7,596,691 accruals and deferred income combined**. No new breakdown or fuller replacement was found. The line is not all established donor advances, spendable cash or yearly expenditure.\n\nThe needed records are the year-end combined-line reconciliation, deferred-income/restricted-grant schedules and underlying grant agreements, with the full approved accounts and board decisions. Custodians are the company and its finance/board/accountant. Reopen on fuller approved accounts, a named grant disclosure or agreement; repeated identical public filing requests will not create the omitted schedule.\n\n## German declarations refreshed, no new payment figures\n\nBoth ControlAI US R007795 v 3 (see source references) and Amir Benjamin Balde R007864 v 2 (see source references) returned original JSON 200 and were saved as `w1-controlai-german-us-entry.json` and `w1-controlai-german-balde-entry.json`. Their substantive versions remain 16March 2026. ControlAI lists Miotti and lobbying operated through a third party; Balde declares ControlAI US as client for AI-risk political education and contacts with MPs, parliamentary staff and officials. This refreshes an already retained commissioned-lobbying relation.\n\nBalde's zero financial figures refer to **calendar 2025**; they do not show whether 2026 lobbying was paid. ControlAI's register finance declarations still say no completed fiscal year. The newly acquired US return provides a completed 2025 tax period and was signed later, inJune. These are different dated filings; this pass does not infer a false statement or legal reporting breach. No new donor names,2026 compensation or contract terms were obtained.\n\n## Route closure and rival impact\n\nThe US-original-return gap is closed by a precise new IRS route. The related-party counterparty question replaces a generic suspicion of cross-border funding with a traceable balance; autonomy with cost sharing, internal advance financing and externally conditioned funding remain distinguishable rivals. UK constitutional authority is now located, but exercised approval and any external covenant remain to be acquired. German official refresh is complete and does not answer 2026 payment. Earlier CauseIQ/ProPublica and US lobbying portal failures were not reopened. The Companies House web-tool fetch failed on an expired cached signed URL; direct ordinary PowerShell succeeded. Image-only PDF extraction was replaced once with visual inspection. No failed endpoint was hammered.\n\nCandidate graph records are in `controlai-candidate.json`, with all new IDs prefixed`w1-controlai`. Keep the related-organisation endpoint visibly unresolved and do not collapse it into Secure Future Research. No historical-job-to-government-funding, CASIR-draft-to-award, preparer-to-auditor, payable-to-paid, or restricted-placeholder-to-donor-count inference is supported.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings",
        "title": "Creator commission acquisition — 8 September 2026",
        "description": "The public record now contains one specific creator-disclosed, grant-supported output and a clearer distinction between three operating forms: grants with a stated independence condition, a jointly acknowledged advocacy collaboration, and vendor production under prior approval. The signed instruments, payment entries and Sabine's original offer remain holder",
        "html": "<p>The public record now contains one specific <strong>creator-disclosed, grant-supported output</strong> and a clearer distinction between three operating forms: grants with a stated independence condition, a jointly acknowledged advocacy collaboration, and vendor production under prior approval. The signed instruments, payment entries and Sabine&#x27;s original offer remain holder records. No outreach, signup, paid access or publication was undertaken.</p>\n<h2 id=\"specific-funded-output-future-tense-mateus\">Specific funded output: Future Tense / Mateus</h2>\n<p>Frame links its named fellow Mateus De Souza to [The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development](http[local research file] published <strong>8 May 2026</strong> by Future Tense. The original public YouTube description explicitly acknowledges production grant funding from <strong>BlueDot Impact, Frame Fellowship and Future of Life Institute</strong>. It states that the funders had no editorial control and the opinions are the creator&#x27;s own.</p>\n<p>This is a new firsthand creator record for one actual published output, beyond Frame&#x27;s own success story that Mateus secured FLI support. The two are separate speakers, though both have interests in the programme. The creator&#x27;s description establishes its public acknowledgment and independence claim; it does not independently verify payment, amount, recipient legal entity, a contractual clause, the absence of informal feedback, or which FLI programme supplied the grant. Do not call the three support edges three independent confirmations: they all come from one description. The description as captured today may have changed after publication; no historical description version was recovered.</p>\n<p>Raw public HTML is <code>creator-mateus.html</code>; the precise extracted description and publication metadata are <code>creator-mateus-metadata.json</code>. <code>creator-capture-receipts.json</code> preserves URL, capture time, hash and bytes for this and other captures. The useful next records are the grant letter(s), named recipient, milestones/renewal terms, payment entry and any revisions for this specific video. Holders are the creator and the relevant FLI/Frame/BlueDot administrators. A public donor award entry could corroborate amount and legal identity, but no new broad funding hunt was launched.</p>\n<h2 id=\"frame-now-names-lead-funders-and-selection-boundaries\">Frame now names lead funders and selection boundaries</h2>\n<p>The [Frame homepage](http[local research file] supplies its public FAQ dynamically through the linked [frontend asset index-CUMxxB1e.js](http[local research file] Reading that delivered public content recovered a consequential answer omitted by the static-page text reader: Frame names <strong>Long Term Future Fund</strong> and <strong>AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund</strong> as its lead funders. It says funders do not select fellows or influence their content, conclusions or framing.</p>\n<p>This is an organisation&#x27;s disclosure, with no amount, award date, agreement, precise grant-making legal entity or donor-side corroboration. It improves the upstream lead while also preserving the explicit contrary evidence to a donor-editorial-control hypothesis. The live FAQ provides no fiscal-sponsor or legal contracting answer; Mox/Manifund contextual ties cannot fill that gap.</p>\n<p>The FAQ says selection evaluates storytelling, niche ownership, clarity and commitment to communication; published work is an important signal. Frame may place applicants in a different track. It describes the stipend as a private nonprofit grant for educational participation and warns that exceptional tailored offers may omit it. Programme deliverables focus on AI; the rest of a creator&#x27;s channel need not. These are current programme terms, not an executed placement contract. The independent-track promise and amplifier-track institutional brief remain distinct. September 7 is the announced new cohort start, not evidence that its work has already been delivered.</p>\n<p>Raw delivered script: <code>creator-frame-public-ui-script.txt</code>. The small <code>creator-frame-faq-extract.json</code> contains 23 question/answer pairs and exact source offsets. It was produced by reading public string literals, without executing code or accessing a private endpoint. Same website/source family; the script is not independent evidence. Holders for the next grant/selection/placement instruments are Frame operations and the named fund administrators. No fresh donor tree was pursued.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-completed-controlai-collaboration-is-acknowledged-on-both-sides\">A completed ControlAI collaboration is acknowledged on both sides</h2>\n<p><a>Rational Animations&#x27; video</a>.</p>\n<p>Neither source names the paying legal entity, fee, contractual script veto, acceptance process or actual payment. A partnership label alone does not make it paid. The original agreement and accepted brief should be sought from Rational Animations and ControlAI&#x27;s partnerships/finance holders. Keep the brand ControlAI separate from the unresolved UK/US contracting selection. Captures are <code>creator-rational.txt</code>, <code>creator-rational-metadata.json</code>, and <code>creator-controlai-rational.html</code>.</p>\n<p>The inspected SciShow video of 31 October 2025 likewise names ControlAI and its lawmaker tool in its description. The Hey AI video linked by Frame does not name CAIS in the inspected description, but Frame&#x27;s claim of a CAIS contract does not establish this particular video was the contract output. Neither an absent description reference nor absent paid-promotion metadata proves a disclosure violation. Those narrower checks are preserved as boundary findings, not accusations.</p>\n<h2 id=\"closest-public-commission-terms-people-first\">Closest public commission terms: People First</h2>\n<p><a>People First&#x27;s current general terms</a>.</p>\n<p>Sections 1–2 place deliverables and price in the SOW, permit Company/Advertiser review and revisions, and require approvals before publication. Sections 4–6 require disclosure compliance and make payment conditional on completed compliant work and evidence of publication. Section 6 names <strong>Dots</strong> as the platform payout provider, with multiple payout methods; this proves no particular campaign disbursement. Sections 9–10 retain creator ownership while licensing organic reuse and, subject to SOW limits, paid amplification. These are current general permissions and conditions, not evidence that a right was exercised against a named creator. They are also not the terms of the separate FLI Digital Media Accelerator.</p>\n<p>The actual decision record is a particular accepted SOW, its dated incorporated terms, accepted brief, revision/approval log, invoice/settlement and live post. Holders are People First, the selected creator and actual advertiser-side contract holder. Dots may know payout, not editorial approval. There is no evidentiary link from this named platform provider to the unidentified bank in the separate games-payment workstream.</p>\n<h2 id=\"sabine-offer-route-closed-on-a-named-holder-gap\">Sabine offer route closed on a named holder gap</h2>\n<p>The original [YouTube publication](http[local research file] dated 5 September 2026, was recovered as public HTML after the web tool could not fetch it. Its description supplies no offer sender or correspondence. It links her Patreon/Substack transcripts. The public Patreon sitemap identifies [post 168573904](http[local research file] but the web fetch failed and one direct public fallback returned 403. That route was stopped. Exact-title and sender searches yielded commentary/mirrors, not original offer correspondence; none was promoted to evidence.</p>\n<p>Her own rejected offer remains <strong>unnamed</strong>. In the supplied transcript, her account of another creator&#x27;s screenshot mentioning CAIS is a separate statement. A causal arrow from any named NGO to her offer remains unsupported. The next record is her original email thread with dates, sender domain, attachments, proposed wording/references, fee and disclosure terms; Sabine and the sender are its holders. Reopen on release or supplied correspondence, without further identity guessing.</p>\n<p>Candidate nodes, typed relations, source ancestry, current-versus-publication-date limits and holder records are in <code>creator-candidate.json</code>. The bounded route is complete: public outputs and closest public terms acquired; original offer, executed contracts, payment proof and exercised approvals remain expressly unresolved.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/creator-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-0448f8be81b7",
          "src-65df3f2c31b3",
          "src-c33ab812f862",
          "src-1d2091e52111",
          "w1-creator-s-sabine",
          "w1-creator-s-mateus",
          "w1-creator-s-rational",
          "w1-creator-s-controlai-rational",
          "w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script",
          "w1-creator-s-scishow",
          "w1-creator-s-veronica"
        ],
        "markdown": "The public record now contains one specific **creator-disclosed, grant-supported output** and a clearer distinction between three operating forms: grants with a stated independence condition, a jointly acknowledged advocacy collaboration, and vendor production under prior approval. The signed instruments, payment entries and Sabine's original offer remain holder records. No outreach, signup, paid access or publication was undertaken.\n\n## Specific funded output: Future Tense / Mateus\n\nFrame links its named fellow Mateus De Souza to The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development (see source references) published **8 May 2026** by Future Tense. The original public YouTube description explicitly acknowledges production grant funding from **BlueDot Impact, Frame Fellowship and Future of Life Institute**. It states that the funders had no editorial control and the opinions are the creator's own.\n\nThis is a new firsthand creator record for one actual published output, beyond Frame's own success story that Mateus secured FLI support. The two are separate speakers, though both have interests in the programme. The creator's description establishes its public acknowledgment and independence claim; it does not independently verify payment, amount, recipient legal entity, a contractual clause, the absence of informal feedback, or which FLI programme supplied the grant. Do not call the three support edges three independent confirmations: they all come from one description. The description as captured today may have changed after publication; no historical description version was recovered.\n\nRaw public HTML is `creator-mateus.html`; the precise extracted description and publication metadata are `creator-mateus-metadata.json`. `creator-capture-receipts.json` preserves URL, capture time, hash and bytes for this and other captures. The useful next records are the grant letter(s), named recipient, milestones/renewal terms, payment entry and any revisions for this specific video. Holders are the creator and the relevant FLI/Frame/BlueDot administrators. A public donor award entry could corroborate amount and legal identity, but no new broad funding hunt was launched.\n\n## Frame now names lead funders and selection boundaries\n\nThe Frame homepage (see source references) supplies its public FAQ dynamically through the linked frontend asset index-CUMxxB1e.js (see source references) Reading that delivered public content recovered a consequential answer omitted by the static-page text reader: Frame names **Long Term Future Fund** and **AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund** as its lead funders. It says funders do not select fellows or influence their content, conclusions or framing.\n\nThis is an organisation's disclosure, with no amount, award date, agreement, precise grant-making legal entity or donor-side corroboration. It improves the upstream lead while also preserving the explicit contrary evidence to a donor-editorial-control hypothesis. The live FAQ provides no fiscal-sponsor or legal contracting answer; Mox/Manifund contextual ties cannot fill that gap.\n\nThe FAQ says selection evaluates storytelling, niche ownership, clarity and commitment to communication; published work is an important signal. Frame may place applicants in a different track. It describes the stipend as a private nonprofit grant for educational participation and warns that exceptional tailored offers may omit it. Programme deliverables focus on AI; the rest of a creator's channel need not. These are current programme terms, not an executed placement contract. The independent-track promise and amplifier-track institutional brief remain distinct. September 7 is the announced new cohort start, not evidence that its work has already been delivered.\n\nRaw delivered script: `creator-frame-public-ui-script.txt`. The small `creator-frame-faq-extract.json` contains 23 question/answer pairs and exact source offsets. It was produced by reading public string literals, without executing code or accessing a private endpoint. Same website/source family; the script is not independent evidence. Holders for the next grant/selection/placement instruments are Frame operations and the named fund administrators. No fresh donor tree was pursued.\n\n## A completed ControlAI collaboration is acknowledged on both sides\n\nRational Animations' video.\n\nNeither source names the paying legal entity, fee, contractual script veto, acceptance process or actual payment. A partnership label alone does not make it paid. The original agreement and accepted brief should be sought from Rational Animations and ControlAI's partnerships/finance holders. Keep the brand ControlAI separate from the unresolved UK/US contracting selection. Captures are `creator-rational.txt`, `creator-rational-metadata.json`, and `creator-controlai-rational.html`.\n\nThe inspected SciShow video of 31 October 2025 likewise names ControlAI and its lawmaker tool in its description. The Hey AI video linked by Frame does not name CAIS in the inspected description, but Frame's claim of a CAIS contract does not establish this particular video was the contract output. Neither an absent description reference nor absent paid-promotion metadata proves a disclosure violation. Those narrower checks are preserved as boundary findings, not accusations.\n\n## Closest public commission terms: People First\n\nPeople First's current general terms.\n\nSections 1–2 place deliverables and price in the SOW, permit Company/Advertiser review and revisions, and require approvals before publication. Sections 4–6 require disclosure compliance and make payment conditional on completed compliant work and evidence of publication. Section 6 names **Dots** as the platform payout provider, with multiple payout methods; this proves no particular campaign disbursement. Sections 9–10 retain creator ownership while licensing organic reuse and, subject to SOW limits, paid amplification. These are current general permissions and conditions, not evidence that a right was exercised against a named creator. They are also not the terms of the separate FLI Digital Media Accelerator.\n\nThe actual decision record is a particular accepted SOW, its dated incorporated terms, accepted brief, revision/approval log, invoice/settlement and live post. Holders are People First, the selected creator and actual advertiser-side contract holder. Dots may know payout, not editorial approval. There is no evidentiary link from this named platform provider to the unidentified bank in the separate games-payment workstream.\n\n## Sabine offer route closed on a named holder gap\n\nThe original YouTube publication (see source references) dated 5 September 2026, was recovered as public HTML after the web tool could not fetch it. Its description supplies no offer sender or correspondence. It links her Patreon/Substack transcripts. The public Patreon sitemap identifies post 168573904 (see source references) but the web fetch failed and one direct public fallback returned 403. That route was stopped. Exact-title and sender searches yielded commentary/mirrors, not original offer correspondence; none was promoted to evidence.\n\nHer own rejected offer remains **unnamed**. In the supplied transcript, her account of another creator's screenshot mentioning CAIS is a separate statement. A causal arrow from any named NGO to her offer remains unsupported. The next record is her original email thread with dates, sender domain, attachments, proposed wording/references, fee and disclosure terms; Sabine and the sender are its holders. Reopen on release or supplied correspondence, without further identity guessing.\n\nCandidate nodes, typed relations, source ancestry, current-versus-publication-date limits and holder records are in `creator-candidate.json`. The bounded route is complete: public outputs and closest public terms acquired; original offer, executed contracts, payment proof and exercised approvals remain expressly unresolved.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings",
        "title": "FLI reserves and European affiliate — 8 September 2026",
        "description": "Bounded public acquisition, Nova. Read tegmark-lightcone-followup.md, FLI workstream notes, source-ledger entries S010/S011/S033 and campaign-plan section7. No outreach, spend or publication. This packet adds an original 2025 audit and identifies a precise Swiss governing-document frontier. Candidate records use prefix w2-fli.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded public acquisition, Nova. Read retained <code>tegmark-lightcone-followup.md</code>, FLI workstream notes, source-ledger entries S010/S011/S033 and campaign-plan section7. No outreach, spend or publication. This packet adds an original 2025 audit and identifies a precise Swiss governing-document frontier. Candidate records use prefix <code>w2-fli</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-pass-resolves\">What this pass resolves</h2>\n<p><strong>The reserve-to-operations transfer continues into 2025.</strong> The newly recovered [full FLI 2025 audit](http[local research file] issued 16 June 2026, reports $45,197,838 of grants received from Lightcone Foundation (Note6, printed p12 / PDF14). Total contributions were $45,234,659 (printed p4 / PDF6). Their difference is <strong>$36,821</strong>, reconciling arithmetically with the website’s approximately $37,000 fundraising figure. Lightcone supplied 99.9186% of contributions (own calculation). The audit is FLI standalone, not a consolidated affiliate/endowment roll-forward. It also records contractual cost sharing: $959,308 due from FLF and $430,343 due to FLF at year-end; these are reciprocal balances, not two new donations. The audit’s $46,191,762 expense and $5,794,889 marketing/communications totals substantiate the website’s rounded figures. This remains a 2025 accounting state.</p>\n<p>The [FLI finance page](http[local research file] read fresh, separates limited fundraising from the endowment-funded difference. It asserts that Buterin’s contribution was unconditional and he lacks a decision role. The arithmetic now explains the apparent discrepancy between small new fundraising and large audited contributions; it does not independently establish original gift conditions or rights. The [German register](http[local research file] updated 30 June 2026, reports Lightcone support in a €38.460–38.470 million band, describing it as unrestricted. Do not add this differently denominated disclosure to the audited dollar receipt or assume an exact conversion without its method.</p>\n<h2 id=\"exact-european-entity-and-transfer-era-governance\">Exact European entity and transfer-era governance</h2>\n<p>The entity identified is <strong>Future of Life Institute Europe</strong>, Swiss foundation <strong>CHE-450.633.132</strong>, commercial register <strong>CH-660.1.343.022-6</strong>, Geneva. [Moneyhouse’s reproduction of the founding Swiss Gazette notice](http[local research file] publication <strong>HR01-1005455911, 21 April 2022</strong>, records a deed dated <strong>11 April 2022</strong> and registration on <strong>14 April 2022</strong>. It names Jaan Tallinn as chair, Anthony Nicholas Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn and Max Erik Tegmark as board members, each with joint signature by two. ECHO SA is auditor. Its “six management persons” display includes that corporate auditor; it is not evidence of six human trustees.</p>\n<p>The reproduced notice mentions a founder’s reserved purpose-modification right under Article86a. It does <strong>not</strong> name the founder in that passage or reveal appointment/removal, distribution-vote or dissolution clauses. A joint-signature rule is not itself a grant-approval rule. The full deed and current statutes were not recovered; treat these as transfer-era facts from a registry reproduction, not certified-current governance.</p>\n<p>An [official Gazette notice mirrored by LIXT](http[local research file] <strong>HR02-1005510667, 1 July 2022</strong>, confirms the same legal name/UID and identifies the Federal Department of Home Affairs as supervisor. This one-page original-format notice was captured. Supervision is not evidence of government funding or editorial direction.</p>\n<p>The [original FLI 2022 Form990](http[local research file] was captured and re-read. ScheduleN, PDF49, reports <strong>$180,297,079</strong> of cash/financial assets transferred to Future of Life Institute Europe on <strong>30 December 2022</strong>. It says Tegmark, Aguirre, Chita-Tegmark and Tallinn were directors of all three transferees before and after the transfers. This establishes transfer-era overlap, not the power to appoint successors. ScheduleO, PDF51, reproduces the US Institute’s amended purpose supporting <strong>Future of Life Foundation, EIN88-0926067</strong>. Lightcone Foundation is separately identified by <strong>EIN92-0636259</strong>. No link to Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong is inferred.</p>\n<p>The US filing uses a Geneva correspondence address different from the Swiss registered office. Exact name, jurisdiction and overlapping named governors support matching the Swiss entity; a recipient-side receipt/accounting statement would directly close that reconciliation. The register date should not be replaced by the Gazette publication date.</p>\n<h2 id=\"roll-forward-and-authority-still-missing\">Roll-forward and authority still missing</h2>\n<p>No inspected public source supplies FLI Europe’s standalone 2022 closing balance, subsequent investment returns, external distributions, interaffiliate transfers and closing reserves through 2025. Accordingly <strong>do not subtract the Lightcone-to-FLI receipt from Europe’s $180.297 million</strong> or treat it as that money returning. Those are different legal entities. The US audit names “Future of Life Europe” among related organisations but gives no Europe balance or received grant in its Note6 table; that is not evidence of zero European activity.</p>\n<p>Two records now define the narrow frontier. First, <strong>the 11 April 2022 deed and current statutes for CHE-450.633.132</strong>, including amendments, identify the founder and appointment, distribution, purpose-change and dissolution powers. [Geneva’s official guidance](http[local research file] says its free registry search can expose statute PDFs for relevant post-November2007 filings. It does not establish that this foundation’s complete instrument is online. The specific search route is http[local research file] . A certified copy or physical dossier is a separate paid route; no order was made.</p>\n<p>Second, seek <strong>FLI Europe’s signed 2022–25 financial statements with investment and related-party schedules</strong>, plus the 30 December2022 transfer acceptance/resolution. The foundation board/finance function holds these; ECHO SA is the publicly identified transfer-era auditor. The federal supervisor is another potential holder, with access eligibility to be assessed before any official request. A voluntary holder request is available without inventing an entitlement. These distinguish an independently administered reserve from centrally appointable affiliates or legally restricted assets. None of those models requires the original donor to retain command.</p>\n<h2 id=\"access-custody-and-stop-boundary\">Access, custody and stop boundary</h2>\n<p>The official legacy SHAB links for the two named notices returned web cache misses. The July notice’s public mirror was a successful substitute; the founding notice remains a third-party registry reproduction. A direct Moneyhouse capture returned403 and was not saved; web-rendered contents were inspected. An exploratory Zefix URL with an unverified numeric identifier returned InternalError and was not treated as an entity record.</p>\n<p>Geneva’s JavaScript registry returned no text to the web extractor. The browser then explicitly denied access because its admin-enforced security policy could not be verified. That route was stopped without workaround or bypass; no page inside the denied registry was inspected. This is a browser security-policy failure, not an automatic approval-review rejection and not proof that the deed is unavailable. Existing lawful sources and the independently recovered audit carry the deliverable.</p>\n<p>Captured files and hashes are recorded in the candidate source metadata. The 2022 return capture succeeded; its first console print encountered Unicode encoding trouble, resolved by reading the saved PDF with ASCII-safe output. PDF extraction was targeted to financial and governance pages; no new visual table inspection is claimed. Documents issued by the same organisation and their registry copies are one underlying origin, not independent confirmation. Broader current affiliate boards, gift instruments and consolidated reserves remain unverified.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/fli-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-5a885dee5911",
          "src-e4e7930e8216",
          "w2-fli-s-audit25",
          "w2-fli-s-founding",
          "w2-fli-s-supervision",
          "w2-fli-s-bundestag",
          "w2-fli-s-geneva-route",
          "w2-fli-s-geneva-dossier"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded public acquisition, Nova. Read retained `tegmark-lightcone-followup.md`, FLI workstream notes, source-ledger entries S010/S011/S033 and campaign-plan section7. No outreach, spend or publication. This packet adds an original 2025 audit and identifies a precise Swiss governing-document frontier. Candidate records use prefix `w2-fli`.\n\n## What this pass resolves\n\n**The reserve-to-operations transfer continues into 2025.** The newly recovered full FLI 2025 audit (see source references) issued 16 June 2026, reports $45,197,838 of grants received from Lightcone Foundation (Note6, printed p12 / PDF14). Total contributions were $45,234,659 (printed p4 / PDF6). Their difference is **$36,821**, reconciling arithmetically with the website’s approximately $37,000 fundraising figure. Lightcone supplied 99.9186% of contributions (own calculation). The audit is FLI standalone, not a consolidated affiliate/endowment roll-forward. It also records contractual cost sharing: $959,308 due from FLF and $430,343 due to FLF at year-end; these are reciprocal balances, not two new donations. The audit’s $46,191,762 expense and $5,794,889 marketing/communications totals substantiate the website’s rounded figures. This remains a 2025 accounting state.\n\nThe FLI finance page (see source references) read fresh, separates limited fundraising from the endowment-funded difference. It asserts that Buterin’s contribution was unconditional and he lacks a decision role. The arithmetic now explains the apparent discrepancy between small new fundraising and large audited contributions; it does not independently establish original gift conditions or rights. The German register (see source references) updated 30 June 2026, reports Lightcone support in a €38.460–38.470 million band, describing it as unrestricted. Do not add this differently denominated disclosure to the audited dollar receipt or assume an exact conversion without its method.\n\n## Exact European entity and transfer-era governance\n\nThe entity identified is **Future of Life Institute Europe**, Swiss foundation **CHE-450.633.132**, commercial register **CH-660.1.343.022-6**, Geneva. Moneyhouse’s reproduction of the founding Swiss Gazette notice (see source references) publication **HR01-1005455911, 21 April 2022**, records a deed dated **11 April 2022** and registration on **14 April 2022**. It names Jaan Tallinn as chair, Anthony Nicholas Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Anna Béatrice Ramsay Fihn and Max Erik Tegmark as board members, each with joint signature by two. ECHO SA is auditor. Its “six management persons” display includes that corporate auditor; it is not evidence of six human trustees.\n\nThe reproduced notice mentions a founder’s reserved purpose-modification right under Article86a. It does **not** name the founder in that passage or reveal appointment/removal, distribution-vote or dissolution clauses. A joint-signature rule is not itself a grant-approval rule. The full deed and current statutes were not recovered; treat these as transfer-era facts from a registry reproduction, not certified-current governance.\n\nAn official Gazette notice mirrored by LIXT (see source references) **HR02-1005510667, 1 July 2022**, confirms the same legal name/UID and identifies the Federal Department of Home Affairs as supervisor. This one-page original-format notice was captured. Supervision is not evidence of government funding or editorial direction.\n\nThe original FLI 2022 Form990 (see source references) was captured and re-read. ScheduleN, PDF49, reports **$180,297,079** of cash/financial assets transferred to Future of Life Institute Europe on **30 December 2022**. It says Tegmark, Aguirre, Chita-Tegmark and Tallinn were directors of all three transferees before and after the transfers. This establishes transfer-era overlap, not the power to appoint successors. ScheduleO, PDF51, reproduces the US Institute’s amended purpose supporting **Future of Life Foundation, EIN88-0926067**. Lightcone Foundation is separately identified by **EIN92-0636259**. No link to Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong is inferred.\n\nThe US filing uses a Geneva correspondence address different from the Swiss registered office. Exact name, jurisdiction and overlapping named governors support matching the Swiss entity; a recipient-side receipt/accounting statement would directly close that reconciliation. The register date should not be replaced by the Gazette publication date.\n\n## Roll-forward and authority still missing\n\nNo inspected public source supplies FLI Europe’s standalone 2022 closing balance, subsequent investment returns, external distributions, interaffiliate transfers and closing reserves through 2025. Accordingly **do not subtract the Lightcone-to-FLI receipt from Europe’s $180.297 million** or treat it as that money returning. Those are different legal entities. The US audit names “Future of Life Europe” among related organisations but gives no Europe balance or received grant in its Note6 table; that is not evidence of zero European activity.\n\nTwo records now define the narrow frontier. First, **the 11 April 2022 deed and current statutes for CHE-450.633.132**, including amendments, identify the founder and appointment, distribution, purpose-change and dissolution powers. Geneva’s official guidance (see source references) says its free registry search can expose statute PDFs for relevant post-November2007 filings. It does not establish that this foundation’s complete instrument is online. The specific search route is http[local research file] . A certified copy or physical dossier is a separate paid route; no order was made.\n\nSecond, seek **FLI Europe’s signed 2022–25 financial statements with investment and related-party schedules**, plus the 30 December2022 transfer acceptance/resolution. The foundation board/finance function holds these; ECHO SA is the publicly identified transfer-era auditor. The federal supervisor is another potential holder, with access eligibility to be assessed before any official request. A voluntary holder request is available without inventing an entitlement. These distinguish an independently administered reserve from centrally appointable affiliates or legally restricted assets. None of those models requires the original donor to retain command.\n\n## Access, custody and stop boundary\n\nThe official legacy SHAB links for the two named notices returned web cache misses. The July notice’s public mirror was a successful substitute; the founding notice remains a third-party registry reproduction. A direct Moneyhouse capture returned403 and was not saved; web-rendered contents were inspected. An exploratory Zefix URL with an unverified numeric identifier returned InternalError and was not treated as an entity record.\n\nGeneva’s JavaScript registry returned no text to the web extractor. The browser then explicitly denied access because its admin-enforced security policy could not be verified. That route was stopped without workaround or bypass; no page inside the denied registry was inspected. This is a browser security-policy failure, not an automatic approval-review rejection and not proof that the deed is unavailable. Existing lawful sources and the independently recovered audit carry the deliverable.\n\nCaptured files and hashes are recorded in the candidate source metadata. The 2022 return capture succeeded; its first console print encountered Unicode encoding trouble, resolved by reading the saved PDF with ASCII-safe output. PDF extraction was targeted to financial and governance pages; no new visual table inspection is claimed. Documents issued by the same organisation and their registry copies are one underlying origin, not independent confirmation. Broader current affiliate boards, gift instruments and consolidated reserves remain unverified.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings",
        "title": "ICMEC acquisition findings — 8 September 2026",
        "description": "Public-record wave by Nova. Findings concern the records and versions identified below; no outreach, paid access, publication or implementation testing. Raw PDFs were inspected in memory, not saved. Candidate graph imports are in icmec-candidate.json.",
        "html": "<p>Public-record wave by Nova. Findings concern the records and versions identified below; no outreach, paid access, publication or implementation testing. Raw PDFs were inspected in memory, not saved. Candidate graph imports are in <code>icmec-candidate.json</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-moved\">What moved</h2>\n<p>The public financial record changes the picture from a presumed well-resourced intermediary to an organisation with substantial financing dependence. It does not identify an age-policy funder. Legislative records reveal negotiated adaptation, including identifiable alternatives and an author’s response, rather than unchanged adoption of an NGO template. A separate historical record does establish payment-company funding of ICMEC policy roundtables.</p>\n<h2 id=\"financial-perimeter-and-funding\">Financial perimeter and funding</h2>\n<p>ICMEC’s [2024 consolidated audit](http[local research file] issued 29 January 2026, covers US ICMEC and its Singapore affiliate, not ICMEC Switzerland. It reports a $2,293,789 net-asset deficit at 31 December 2024 and $817,886 of programme-restricted assets. Its going-concern discussion identifies dependence on unrestricted fundraising; management reports signed 2026 grants/contracts. Note 2 records board-member and Swiss-affiliate borrowing. Note 9 records a US-government stop-work order dated 27 January 2025. These are historical accounts, not a September 2026 balance sheet. Locators: printed pp9,12–16; going concern p15; one-based PDF pages10,13–17. The audit says staff allocations use biweekly timesheets; underlying programme allocation records should therefore exist.</p>\n<p>The [2024 Form 990](http[local research file] names board members Franz Humer, Sally Paul and Rick Li as interested persons in operating-fund loans, with $1,117,000 aggregate outstanding in Schedule L, Part II; explanatory Part V follows (PDF pages42–43). “Interested person” is not automatically the legal lender: the audit identifies ICMEC Switzerland for some loans. Row extraction did not justify assigning every amount to a person. Schedule C, Part II-A (PDF p28) reports $996 direct lobbying and zero grassroots lobbying in FY2024. This predates AB1043 and does not disclose its budget. The programme reporting inspected does not isolate age-policy expenditure.</p>\n<p>ICMEC’s [supporters page](http[local research file] lists Meta among $25,000-plus general supporters <strong>as of 1 May 2023</strong>; a separate Financial Coalition section names payment/financial firms without amounts. Neither establishes a 2025 legislative earmark.</p>\n<p>A more concrete historical route appears in [ICMEC’s APFC roundtable account](http[local research file] a PayPal grant enabled country roundtables; Microsoft and law firms supplied in-kind resources; resulting working groups included Australia, whose institutional home was the Australian Payments Network’s Fraud in Banking Forum. This establishes recipient-reported resource mobilisation and institutional follow-through. The undated page refers to activity since 2013; no grant amount, age-policy earmark or current financing arrangement is disclosed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"drafts-decisions-and-operative-design\">Drafts, decisions and operative design</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record</th>\n<th>New decision or boundary established</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>[ICMEC model legislation](http[local research file] pp2–4</td>\n<td>Proposes OS/device age signals, parental consent for under-16 downloads, and adult-content blocking. Title calls it an Act of 2025; the upload-directory date is not independently verified publication timing.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Technical whitepaper, 7 February 2025](http[local research file] p5</td>\n<td>Proposes OS-provider review/approval of website API integrations and agreed use cases. This is a proposed admission function, not proof that a law or deployed API grants those powers.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[AB1043 APCP analysis, 22 April 2025](http[local research file] March28 version, pp1–4,16</td>\n<td>Lists ICMEC and Children Now as co-sponsors; the then-current design includes six age bands and parental download consent.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[Senate Judiciary analysis, 15 July 2025](http[local research file] May23 version, pp16–17,19</td>\n<td>Records stakeholder technical/scoping concerns and the author’s agreement to narrow the application definition by removing online services/products/features. It identifies speech concerns about download-consent restrictions. Only Children Now is listed as sponsor; this roster difference alone does not establish ICMEC’s withdrawal or motive.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[AB1043 chaptered text](http[local research file] Chapter675, 13 October 2025</td>\n<td>Enacted age-signal framework, operative January2027, differs from the model: four bands and account-entered age; the inspected text lacks the earlier parental-download consent and broad website scheme. It includes data minimisation and non-discrimination. The whitepaper’s per-website API approval mechanism is not established by this text.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[AB1856 APCP analysis, 21 April 2026](http[local research file] April6 version, pp5–6</td>\n<td>Identifies an MPA memo seeking a family-account carveout and an option to block minors. The author instead chooses a generally applicable clarification of conflicting age evidence. Committee discussion criticises a general minor-exclusion option. Proposed browser/website duties are explicitly described.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>[AB1856 enrolled text](http[local research file] and [official status](http[local research file] checked 8 September 2026</td>\n<td>Enrolled September1, presented to Governor September4 at4pm; no signature shown. Current text contains an open-source OS exclusion and account-setup limitation. It omits the April browser/website scheme. Treat this as pending legislation, not operative law.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The April2026 committee account is a credible counterpart to the previously failed Wicks-page capture. It supplies named requests, deliberation and an alternative actually chosen, although the MPA memorandum itself remains unacquired. The current record supports selective template diffusion and local negotiation; it does not establish donor control of drafting.</p>\n<h2 id=\"access-and-ancestry\">Access and ancestry</h2>\n<p>Both financial PDFs returned ordinary HTTP200 and were read using pypdf. Audit: 429,674 bytes; SHA256 <code>277651b6bccf9ca39e565f8e515fed219a95a56cf5f3996ecfce0ceb61b6b2fc</code>. Return: 557,097 bytes; SHA256 <code>553fb43c3deed524f2288fa96661f756d83fa9925535a7a7de890328553ee991</code>. Web PDF screenshot routes produced no usable financial image (cache misses on attempted audit/990 pages); no visual row alignment is claimed. The two documents provide different financial disclosures but remain records supplied by the same organisation, not independent donor confirmation.</p>\n<p>The official AB1043 version selector was read through ordinary HTTP200. It exposes introduced February20; amendments March28, April24, May23, July23, September5; enrolled September16; chaptered October13, all2025. Direct web opens using <code>&amp;version=20250AB104399INT</code> and <code>&amp;version=20250AB104395AMD</code> failed with InternalError; these failures do not mean historical texts are absent. Version-specific committee PDFs and the chaptered statute were the successful substitute. Exact amendment-by-amendment attribution of every deletion remains unfinished. No repeat of the unchanged Wicks raw-capture failure was attempted.</p>\n<p>ICMEC model and whitepaper are one organisational source family; copies elsewhere are not corroboration. Committee analyses are official accounts, but attributed stakeholder arguments are not committee findings. This bounded pass inspected public finance, organisational programme/supporter pages and official legislative routes; it was not an exhaustive donor-record search.</p>\n<h2 id=\"consequential-missing-joint\">Consequential missing joint</h2>\n<p>The best next financial holder record is ICMEC’s 2024–26 age-assurance project ledger/cost-centre allocation, linked grant schedules and approval record. Ask ICMEC voluntarily for who paid for model/whitepaper production and legislative engagement, amounts, dates, restrictions and approval rights. The audit indicates time-allocation records exist; it does not prove a distinct age-policy cost centre exists. Unrestricted funding, earmarked drafting support and commercial deliverables imply materially different relationships.</p>\n<p>For design lineage, seek the MPA memorandum already described by the April2026 committee and the author/committee’s amendment instructions or stakeholder submissions. Public committee holdings are the first route; otherwise request from the holders without assuming a particular legal access entitlement. The discriminating issue is who proposed the surviving and deleted provisions, not who appeared on a general supporter list. Actual OS API admission terms would distinguish a mandatory neutral signal service from discretionary commercial gatekeeping; the whitepaper alone cannot settle that implementation question.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/icmec-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "s2-icmec-donors",
          "s2-ab1043-analysis",
          "s2-age-paper",
          "w1-icmec-s-audit",
          "w1-icmec-s-990",
          "w1-icmec-s-apfc",
          "w1-icmec-s-model",
          "w1-icmec-s-sjud25",
          "w1-icmec-s-ab1043",
          "w1-icmec-s-apcp26",
          "w1-icmec-s-ab1856",
          "w1-icmec-s-ab1856-status"
        ],
        "markdown": "Public-record wave by Nova. Findings concern the records and versions identified below; no outreach, paid access, publication or implementation testing. Raw PDFs were inspected in memory, not saved. Candidate graph imports are in `icmec-candidate.json`.\n\n## What moved\n\nThe public financial record changes the picture from a presumed well-resourced intermediary to an organisation with substantial financing dependence. It does not identify an age-policy funder. Legislative records reveal negotiated adaptation, including identifiable alternatives and an author’s response, rather than unchanged adoption of an NGO template. A separate historical record does establish payment-company funding of ICMEC policy roundtables.\n\n## Financial perimeter and funding\n\nICMEC’s 2024 consolidated audit (see source references) issued 29 January 2026, covers US ICMEC and its Singapore affiliate, not ICMEC Switzerland. It reports a $2,293,789 net-asset deficit at 31 December 2024 and $817,886 of programme-restricted assets. Its going-concern discussion identifies dependence on unrestricted fundraising; management reports signed 2026 grants/contracts. Note 2 records board-member and Swiss-affiliate borrowing. Note 9 records a US-government stop-work order dated 27 January 2025. These are historical accounts, not a September 2026 balance sheet. Locators: printed pp9,12–16; going concern p15; one-based PDF pages10,13–17. The audit says staff allocations use biweekly timesheets; underlying programme allocation records should therefore exist.\n\nThe 2024 Form 990 (see source references) names board members Franz Humer, Sally Paul and Rick Li as interested persons in operating-fund loans, with $1,117,000 aggregate outstanding in Schedule L, Part II; explanatory Part V follows (PDF pages42–43). “Interested person” is not automatically the legal lender: the audit identifies ICMEC Switzerland for some loans. Row extraction did not justify assigning every amount to a person. Schedule C, Part II-A (PDF p28) reports $996 direct lobbying and zero grassroots lobbying in FY2024. This predates AB1043 and does not disclose its budget. The programme reporting inspected does not isolate age-policy expenditure.\n\nICMEC’s supporters page (see source references) lists Meta among $25,000-plus general supporters **as of 1 May 2023**; a separate Financial Coalition section names payment/financial firms without amounts. Neither establishes a 2025 legislative earmark.\n\nA more concrete historical route appears in ICMEC’s APFC roundtable account (see source references) a PayPal grant enabled country roundtables; Microsoft and law firms supplied in-kind resources; resulting working groups included Australia, whose institutional home was the Australian Payments Network’s Fraud in Banking Forum. This establishes recipient-reported resource mobilisation and institutional follow-through. The undated page refers to activity since 2013; no grant amount, age-policy earmark or current financing arrangement is disclosed.\n\n## Drafts, decisions and operative design\n\n| Record | New decision or boundary established |\n| --- | --- |\n| ICMEC model legislation (see source references) pp2–4 | Proposes OS/device age signals, parental consent for under-16 downloads, and adult-content blocking. Title calls it an Act of 2025; the upload-directory date is not independently verified publication timing. |\n| Technical whitepaper, 7 February 2025 (see source references) p5 | Proposes OS-provider review/approval of website API integrations and agreed use cases. This is a proposed admission function, not proof that a law or deployed API grants those powers. |\n| AB1043 APCP analysis, 22 April 2025 (see source references) March28 version, pp1–4,16 | Lists ICMEC and Children Now as co-sponsors; the then-current design includes six age bands and parental download consent. |\n| Senate Judiciary analysis, 15 July 2025 (see source references) May23 version, pp16–17,19 | Records stakeholder technical/scoping concerns and the author’s agreement to narrow the application definition by removing online services/products/features. It identifies speech concerns about download-consent restrictions. Only Children Now is listed as sponsor; this roster difference alone does not establish ICMEC’s withdrawal or motive. |\n| AB1043 chaptered text (see source references) Chapter675, 13 October 2025 | Enacted age-signal framework, operative January2027, differs from the model: four bands and account-entered age; the inspected text lacks the earlier parental-download consent and broad website scheme. It includes data minimisation and non-discrimination. The whitepaper’s per-website API approval mechanism is not established by this text. |\n| AB1856 APCP analysis, 21 April 2026 (see source references) April6 version, pp5–6 | Identifies an MPA memo seeking a family-account carveout and an option to block minors. The author instead chooses a generally applicable clarification of conflicting age evidence. Committee discussion criticises a general minor-exclusion option. Proposed browser/website duties are explicitly described. |\n| AB1856 enrolled text (see source references) and official status (see source references) checked 8 September 2026 | Enrolled September1, presented to Governor September4 at4pm; no signature shown. Current text contains an open-source OS exclusion and account-setup limitation. It omits the April browser/website scheme. Treat this as pending legislation, not operative law. |\n\nThe April2026 committee account is a credible counterpart to the previously failed Wicks-page capture. It supplies named requests, deliberation and an alternative actually chosen, although the MPA memorandum itself remains unacquired. The current record supports selective template diffusion and local negotiation; it does not establish donor control of drafting.\n\n## Access and ancestry\n\nBoth financial PDFs returned ordinary HTTP200 and were read using pypdf. Audit: 429,674 bytes; SHA256 `277651b6bccf9ca39e565f8e515fed219a95a56cf5f3996ecfce0ceb61b6b2fc`. Return: 557,097 bytes; SHA256 `553fb43c3deed524f2288fa96661f756d83fa9925535a7a7de890328553ee991`. Web PDF screenshot routes produced no usable financial image (cache misses on attempted audit/990 pages); no visual row alignment is claimed. The two documents provide different financial disclosures but remain records supplied by the same organisation, not independent donor confirmation.\n\nThe official AB1043 version selector was read through ordinary HTTP200. It exposes introduced February20; amendments March28, April24, May23, July23, September5; enrolled September16; chaptered October13, all2025. Direct web opens using `&version=20250AB104399INT` and `&version=20250AB104395AMD` failed with InternalError; these failures do not mean historical texts are absent. Version-specific committee PDFs and the chaptered statute were the successful substitute. Exact amendment-by-amendment attribution of every deletion remains unfinished. No repeat of the unchanged Wicks raw-capture failure was attempted.\n\nICMEC model and whitepaper are one organisational source family; copies elsewhere are not corroboration. Committee analyses are official accounts, but attributed stakeholder arguments are not committee findings. This bounded pass inspected public finance, organisational programme/supporter pages and official legislative routes; it was not an exhaustive donor-record search.\n\n## Consequential missing joint\n\nThe best next financial holder record is ICMEC’s 2024–26 age-assurance project ledger/cost-centre allocation, linked grant schedules and approval record. Ask ICMEC voluntarily for who paid for model/whitepaper production and legislative engagement, amounts, dates, restrictions and approval rights. The audit indicates time-allocation records exist; it does not prove a distinct age-policy cost centre exists. Unrestricted funding, earmarked drafting support and commercial deliverables imply materially different relationships.\n\nFor design lineage, seek the MPA memorandum already described by the April2026 committee and the author/committee’s amendment instructions or stakeholder submissions. Public committee holdings are the first route; otherwise request from the holders without assuming a particular legal access entitlement. The discriminating issue is who proposed the surviving and deleted provisions, not who appeared on a general supporter list. Actual OS API admission terms would distinguish a mandatory neutral signal service from discretionary commercial gatekeeping; the whitepaper alone cannot settle that implementation question.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-icmec-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings",
        "title": "Payment permissions: bounded acquisition return",
        "description": "The strongest new addition is Steam's own attributed notice chain. Valve supplied statements to the journalist who published them, including a rejected alternative and the precise Mastercard rule reportedly invoked. Separately, original itch records expose an earlier platform payout decision and a contemporaneous UK geographic-compliance decision. The bank b",
        "html": "<p>Nova · 8 September 2026 · Candidate wave w1-payments</p>\n<p>The strongest new addition is Steam&#x27;s own attributed notice chain. Valve supplied statements to the journalist who published them, including a rejected alternative and the precise Mastercard rule reportedly invoked. Separately, original itch records expose an earlier platform payout decision and a contemporaneous UK geographic-compliance decision. The bank behind itch&#x27;s July 2025 restriction remains unidentified.</p>\n<p>This wave adds source-backed candidates to the retained 175-node/236-edge edition. It does not alter the canonical case. Current revised webpages were read; raw correspondence, immutable historical policy payloads and account-specific agreements were not obtained.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-new\">What is new</h2>\n<p><strong>Steam: the recipient published Valve&#x27;s response.</strong> GamingOnLinux&#x27;s July 17 update records Valve saying processors had flagged games, and that it retired affected titles to protect payment methods used elsewhere in the store. Valve also described developer notification and future app credits. The reporter explicitly says Valve press replied to the publication; raw message headers and attachments are absent. Locator: July 17 update, article lines 8–11. [Recipient&#x27;s July article](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The August 1 update is more discriminating. Valve says Mastercard did not communicate directly with Valve; processors relayed communications involving Mastercard and acquiring banks. Valve says those processors rejected its legal-content argument and cited Rule 5.12.7. This is a company account supplied to its recipient journalist, not recovered upstream instructions. Locator: Update 23:36 BST, lines 8–10; last update 22:38 UTC. [Recipient&#x27;s August article](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>This permits a Steam-specific attributed chain without importing Stripe&#x27;s itch role. The processors remain unnamed. The existing graph node “Payment-letter addressees” is not their identity. Mastercard&#x27;s denial and the June 3, 2025 rulebook remain separate retained records. The apparent disagreement could concern who communicated, what was requested, or downstream interpretation of a broad rule; it cannot be resolved by treating either public statement as the missing instruction.</p>\n<p><strong>Itch: internal eligibility and exit machinery predate July 2025.</strong> An official admin reply dated April 26, 2023 says selected developers had lost eligibility for collected payouts and links the platform&#x27;s notice. It distinguishes selected exclusions from a universal change and says raising a seller&#x27;s revenue share will not reverse the decision. Locator: pinned reply opening and revenue-share discussion; original HTML timestamp title 2023-04-26 17:07:52, timezone unspecified. [Original admin reply](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The linked notice currently explains content/risk/review-resource factors and requires affected sellers to leave collected payouts. Final-balance timing and a migration window govern the transition; existing purchases remain distinct from accepting new payments. Locator: opening paragraphs and final-payout FAQ. [Original notice template](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The template is undated current text, linked by a dated 2023 post with later edits. We did not recover immutable 2023 wording. Its value is a documented decision function and switching constraints; it does not establish why July 2025 restrictions occurred.</p>\n<p><strong>Itch: UK page blocking was a separate compliance response.</strong> Its July 27, 2025 official update describes geographic restrictions attributed to OSA compliance, tag classification with staff override, a dashboard appeal, and preserved downloads for existing purchases. It also announces exploration of unnamed digital-ID providers. Locator: lines 30–36 and 47; topic created 22:08 UTC and now marked five edits. [Original OSA update](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A dated July 29 compiler entry reproduces material paragraphs and links that original. It supports contemporaneous circulation, not independent corroboration or a deployed provider relationship. [Compiler entry](http[local research file] The candidate therefore keeps geographic blocking, payment eligibility and prospective ID procurement separate.</p>\n<p><strong>The edited Stripe account has a contemporaneous reproduction.</strong> GamingOnLinux&#x27;s August 1 article, published 15:53 UTC and updated 15:55 UTC, reproduces itch&#x27;s account of Stripe&#x27;s bank restriction and sexual-content boundary. It narrows the risk that this central explanation appeared only in a later edit of itch&#x27;s July 31 post. Locator: lines 9–13. It depends on that post and is not another Stripe confirmation. [Contemporaneous reproduction](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"historical-policy-identified-capture-unavailable-payload\">Historical policy: identified capture, unavailable payload</h2>\n<p>An ordinary public request returned the Internet Archive&#x27;s CDX index for Stripe&#x27;s restricted-businesses page. Selected exact records:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Capture (UTC)</th>\n<th>CDX digest</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-08 05:08:09</td>\n<td>HNQ3PWU6LEKUJDDDBLCEIJO2L6UNZLSI</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-16 03:57:34</td>\n<td>Y6IHCIODMO7GZPK2DIX2NFX4HCTLKHGN</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-21 11:38:01</td>\n<td>SPBM6EM327CWVJQ5YGRLJQ45SEMGZY7E</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-24 06:25:46</td>\n<td>RK6F3PRVKVHI4UA7M5SABV2U7XH7HRJ5</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-30 08:02:27</td>\n<td>7BWWDYBGRVVVIR6JKXTRUG4C4AGDX237</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-30 13:58:37</td>\n<td>MBJBZ4JBCCYJOOFIXUXHLQVPWYQAFQHP</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025-07-31 17:25:09</td>\n<td>YOGAFSZ53AHNPYSFVMMGLUL5Q72EV3YG</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>[Exact CDX query](http[local research file] Different digests do not establish changed policy text; dynamic HTML is an alternative.</p>\n<p>Payload replay using id_ URLs failed in the web tool with a nonretryable URL-safety/parser error. One standard-replay substitute also failed: [identified July 21 capture](http[local research file] This route stopped. A separate itch archive-index request returned HTTP 429 and was not retried. Current [Stripe general terms](http[local research file] were inspected only as background after the /legal/ssa/us route failed; they were not treated as itch&#x27;s July 2025 contract.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-records-still-held-elsewhere\">The records still held elsewhere</h2>\n<p>The itch joint is the original July 2025 conversation/communication, whatever its medium; the bank instruction it references; the merchant/acquirer arrangement; and the accepted terms and implementation exchange. Public language about speaking with Stripe does not establish an email. Relevant custodians are itch payments/operations and Stripe&#x27;s account/risk team. The bank becomes a named lead only when account-specific routing identifies it.</p>\n<p>The Steam joint is Valve&#x27;s processor notice and response, the corresponding Mastercard/acquirer message and the actual counterparty identities. Valve payments/legal and its processor counterparts should hold operational communications; Valve press and GamingOnLinux hold the identified company replies. The published replies establish an attributed account, not the contents of unrecovered upstream records.</p>\n<p>No original bank instruction or account-specific historical agreement was located in the bounded official, archive-index and released-correspondence/exhibit search. This is not an exhaustive court-docket search and does not establish nonexistence or a holder refusal. No outreach occurred. Reopen on a released notice, a functioning authorized archive route, routing disclosure or substantive holder response.</p>\n<h2 id=\"exclusions-and-comparison\">Exclusions and comparison</h2>\n<p>A compiler&#x27;s Discord transcription offered a potentially useful Stripe case comment, but supplied no original message link or screenshot. Its detailed entry dates the message July 25 at 20:13 -0700, the linked timeline dates it July 25 at 03:13 UTC, and the entry creation metadata is July 25 at 06:20:34. These do not reconcile. It is excluded from event chronology and mechanism claims. [Transcription](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The evidence now supports a specific bargaining step in Steam&#x27;s account and documented platform decision machinery at itch. It remains compatible with outside instruction, downstream underwriting interpretation and platform precaution operating together. Geographic compliance creates an additional, separately evidenced explanation for some restrictions. None of these records establishes a common command structure, a named bank behind itch, a Stripe–Steam processing relationship or a deployed itch identity-provider contract.</p>\n<h2 id=\"integration-handoff\">Integration handoff</h2>\n<p>payments-candidate.json contains five new role/event/program nodes, seven typed edges, fourteen source records (including explicit retained-origin alias and inaccessible/excluded records), four leads and provenance/dependency notes. Its external node IDs refer to the retained explorer. Alias the retained itch reindexing source by exact URL during integration. Source counts are bibliographic records, not independent confirmations. No existing relationship is upgraded by adding a derivative report. No effective start date is inferred from September 8 inspection.</p>\n<p>Only this note and the candidate packet were written. They contain citations, bounded paraphrases, access outcomes and index metadata; no full-text local captures are claimed.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08/payments-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-094404b86089",
          "w1-payments-src-itch-admin-20230426",
          "w1-payments-src-itch-payout-notice",
          "w1-payments-src-valve-reply-20250717",
          "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250717",
          "w1-payments-src-valve-reply-20250801",
          "w1-payments-src-gol-valve-20250801",
          "w1-payments-src-gol-itch-20250801",
          "w1-payments-src-itch-osa-20250727",
          "w1-payments-src-exo-osa-20250729",
          "w1-payments-src-stripe-policy-cdx",
          "w1-payments-src-stripe-policy-20250721",
          "w1-payments-src-exo-discord-excluded",
          "w1-payments-src-stripe-ssa-current"
        ],
        "markdown": "Nova · 8 September 2026 · Candidate wave w1-payments\n\nThe strongest new addition is Steam's own attributed notice chain. Valve supplied statements to the journalist who published them, including a rejected alternative and the precise Mastercard rule reportedly invoked. Separately, original itch records expose an earlier platform payout decision and a contemporaneous UK geographic-compliance decision. The bank behind itch's July 2025 restriction remains unidentified.\n\nThis wave adds source-backed candidates to the retained 175-node/236-edge edition. It does not alter the canonical case. Current revised webpages were read; raw correspondence, immutable historical policy payloads and account-specific agreements were not obtained.\n\n## What is new\n\n**Steam: the recipient published Valve's response.** GamingOnLinux's July 17 update records Valve saying processors had flagged games, and that it retired affected titles to protect payment methods used elsewhere in the store. Valve also described developer notification and future app credits. The reporter explicitly says Valve press replied to the publication; raw message headers and attachments are absent. Locator: July 17 update, article lines 8–11. Recipient's July article (see source references)\n\nThe August 1 update is more discriminating. Valve says Mastercard did not communicate directly with Valve; processors relayed communications involving Mastercard and acquiring banks. Valve says those processors rejected its legal-content argument and cited Rule 5.12.7. This is a company account supplied to its recipient journalist, not recovered upstream instructions. Locator: Update 23:36 BST, lines 8–10; last update 22:38 UTC. Recipient's August article (see source references)\n\nThis permits a Steam-specific attributed chain without importing Stripe's itch role. The processors remain unnamed. The existing graph node “Payment-letter addressees” is not their identity. Mastercard's denial and the June 3, 2025 rulebook remain separate retained records. The apparent disagreement could concern who communicated, what was requested, or downstream interpretation of a broad rule; it cannot be resolved by treating either public statement as the missing instruction.\n\n**Itch: internal eligibility and exit machinery predate July 2025.** An official admin reply dated April 26, 2023 says selected developers had lost eligibility for collected payouts and links the platform's notice. It distinguishes selected exclusions from a universal change and says raising a seller's revenue share will not reverse the decision. Locator: pinned reply opening and revenue-share discussion; original HTML timestamp title 2023-04-26 17:07:52, timezone unspecified. Original admin reply (see source references)\n\nThe linked notice currently explains content/risk/review-resource factors and requires affected sellers to leave collected payouts. Final-balance timing and a migration window govern the transition; existing purchases remain distinct from accepting new payments. Locator: opening paragraphs and final-payout FAQ. Original notice template (see source references)\n\nThe template is undated current text, linked by a dated 2023 post with later edits. We did not recover immutable 2023 wording. Its value is a documented decision function and switching constraints; it does not establish why July 2025 restrictions occurred.\n\n**Itch: UK page blocking was a separate compliance response.** Its July 27, 2025 official update describes geographic restrictions attributed to OSA compliance, tag classification with staff override, a dashboard appeal, and preserved downloads for existing purchases. It also announces exploration of unnamed digital-ID providers. Locator: lines 30–36 and 47; topic created 22:08 UTC and now marked five edits. Original OSA update (see source references)\n\nA dated July 29 compiler entry reproduces material paragraphs and links that original. It supports contemporaneous circulation, not independent corroboration or a deployed provider relationship. Compiler entry (see source references) The candidate therefore keeps geographic blocking, payment eligibility and prospective ID procurement separate.\n\n**The edited Stripe account has a contemporaneous reproduction.** GamingOnLinux's August 1 article, published 15:53 UTC and updated 15:55 UTC, reproduces itch's account of Stripe's bank restriction and sexual-content boundary. It narrows the risk that this central explanation appeared only in a later edit of itch's July 31 post. Locator: lines 9–13. It depends on that post and is not another Stripe confirmation. Contemporaneous reproduction (see source references)\n\n## Historical policy: identified capture, unavailable payload\n\nAn ordinary public request returned the Internet Archive's CDX index for Stripe's restricted-businesses page. Selected exact records:\n\n| Capture (UTC) | CDX digest |\n| --- | --- |\n| 2025-07-08 05:08:09 | HNQ3PWU6LEKUJDDDBLCEIJO2L6UNZLSI |\n| 2025-07-16 03:57:34 | Y6IHCIODMO7GZPK2DIX2NFX4HCTLKHGN |\n| 2025-07-21 11:38:01 | SPBM6EM327CWVJQ5YGRLJQ45SEMGZY7E |\n| 2025-07-24 06:25:46 | RK6F3PRVKVHI4UA7M5SABV2U7XH7HRJ5 |\n| 2025-07-30 08:02:27 | 7BWWDYBGRVVVIR6JKXTRUG4C4AGDX237 |\n| 2025-07-30 13:58:37 | MBJBZ4JBCCYJOOFIXUXHLQVPWYQAFQHP |\n| 2025-07-31 17:25:09 | YOGAFSZ53AHNPYSFVMMGLUL5Q72EV3YG |\n\nExact CDX query (see source references) Different digests do not establish changed policy text; dynamic HTML is an alternative.\n\nPayload replay using id_ URLs failed in the web tool with a nonretryable URL-safety/parser error. One standard-replay substitute also failed: identified July 21 capture (see source references) This route stopped. A separate itch archive-index request returned HTTP 429 and was not retried. Current Stripe general terms (see source references) were inspected only as background after the /legal/ssa/us route failed; they were not treated as itch's July 2025 contract.\n\n## The records still held elsewhere\n\nThe itch joint is the original July 2025 conversation/communication, whatever its medium; the bank instruction it references; the merchant/acquirer arrangement; and the accepted terms and implementation exchange. Public language about speaking with Stripe does not establish an email. Relevant custodians are itch payments/operations and Stripe's account/risk team. The bank becomes a named lead only when account-specific routing identifies it.\n\nThe Steam joint is Valve's processor notice and response, the corresponding Mastercard/acquirer message and the actual counterparty identities. Valve payments/legal and its processor counterparts should hold operational communications; Valve press and GamingOnLinux hold the identified company replies. The published replies establish an attributed account, not the contents of unrecovered upstream records.\n\nNo original bank instruction or account-specific historical agreement was located in the bounded official, archive-index and released-correspondence/exhibit search. This is not an exhaustive court-docket search and does not establish nonexistence or a holder refusal. No outreach occurred. Reopen on a released notice, a functioning authorized archive route, routing disclosure or substantive holder response.\n\n## Exclusions and comparison\n\nA compiler's Discord transcription offered a potentially useful Stripe case comment, but supplied no original message link or screenshot. Its detailed entry dates the message July 25 at 20:13 -0700, the linked timeline dates it July 25 at 03:13 UTC, and the entry creation metadata is July 25 at 06:20:34. These do not reconcile. It is excluded from event chronology and mechanism claims. Transcription (see source references)\n\nThe evidence now supports a specific bargaining step in Steam's account and documented platform decision machinery at itch. It remains compatible with outside instruction, downstream underwriting interpretation and platform precaution operating together. Geographic compliance creates an additional, separately evidenced explanation for some restrictions. None of these records establishes a common command structure, a named bank behind itch, a Stripe–Steam processing relationship or a deployed itch identity-provider contract.\n\n## Integration handoff\n\npayments-candidate.json contains five new role/event/program nodes, seven typed edges, fourteen source records (including explicit retained-origin alias and inaccessible/excluded records), four leads and provenance/dependency notes. Its external node IDs refer to the retained explorer. Alias the retained itch reindexing source by exact URL during integration. Source counts are bibliographic records, not independent confirmations. No existing relationship is upgraded by adding a derivative report. No effective start date is inferred from September 8 inspection.\n\nOnly this note and the candidate packet were written. They contain citations, bounded paraphrases, access outcomes and index metadata; no full-text local captures are claimed.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-payments-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings",
        "title": "5Rights–Capitol Connection: the 2022 operation now has a documentary middle",
        "description": "Research packet for root integration; captured September 8, 2026 in America/Chicago (some receipt timestamps are September 9 UTC). This is a bounded historical acquisition, not a statement about the Act's present enforceability. Canonical case and reader edition were not changed.",
        "html": "<p>Research packet for root integration; captured September 8, 2026 in America/Chicago (some receipt timestamps are September 9 UTC). This is a bounded historical acquisition, not a statement about the Act&#x27;s present enforceability. Canonical case and reader edition were not changed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>The retained $50,000 contract is now connected to actual filed advocacy materials, dated amendment correspondence and published legislative arguments. The strongest addition is not another funding association. It is an identifiable policy dispute: preserve protection through age 17 while conceding changes elsewhere. The correspondence records 5Rights&#x27; chair advocating that position; California&#x27;s enacted 2022 text retains it. Causation of individual amendments and donor approval remain unresolved.</p>\n<h3 id=\"1-original-contract-what-the-client-actually-owned-and-what-the-money-record-actually-says\">1. Original contract: what the client actually owned, and what the money record actually says</h3>\n<p>The original [Exhibit AB](http[local research file] PDF pp22–23, covers May 1–September 30, 2022. Nick Martlew signs as 5Rights executive director on May 24; Doug Subers signs for Capitol Connection on May 17. Its scope includes coalition calls, lobbying, letter development/review and stakeholder-amendment negotiation. It assigns resulting work, including drafts, to 5Rights. The prior-written-consent provision concerns disclosure of non-public information, with legal and already-public exceptions; it is not a separately stated requirement that every legislative position receive editorial approval. Some expenses require advance client approval. Monthly invoices are contractually specified but are not attached.</p>\n<p>PDF p21 contains five $10,000 entries under a “Date Received” column. Each gives a range, not a single bank date: June 2–29; July 18–August 12; August 2–12; August 27–September 21; September 22–October 4, 2022. These are registrant-reported receipts, not inspected bank transfers. The five entries total $50,000; their overlap should be preserved rather than silently regularized into five monthly payment dates. Work-product ownership, release permission and actual approval decisions must remain separate.</p>\n<p>This refresh enriches existing <strong>e157</strong>, not a new money edge. The original source duplicates <strong>src-55256b9868ae</strong>. No upstream earmark was established; the 2023 Oak award cannot fund this chain by chronological assumption.</p>\n<h3 id=\"2-a-real-client-side-decision-recorded-in-two-contemporary-letters\">2. A real client-side decision, recorded in two contemporary letters</h3>\n<p>[Kidron to Anthony Portantino, August 3, 2022](http[local research file] p1, thanks him for a meeting and says she worked with her team and the bill&#x27;s authors on amendments responding to his issue and stakeholder needs. She seeks support for retaining under-18 coverage and alignment with the UK code. This is a named participant&#x27;s contemporary account, subsequently filed by CapConn, rather than independent verification of everything described.</p>\n<p>[Kidron to Henry Stern, August 3, 2022](http[local research file] p1, is more discriminating: it says industry participants sought an under-13 or under-16 boundary, asks Stern to preserve under-18 coverage, and reports amendments addressing Portantino&#x27;s and other stakeholders&#x27; feedback. It also thanks Stern for willingness to become a co-author. The two letters bear House of Lords stationery. That establishes the institutional presentation used, not a UK-government funding or instruction chain. The letters do not identify which industry party sought which age cutoff.</p>\n<p>The files distinguish a substantive preference from generic sponsorship. They support an active bargaining role for Kidron; they do not show her directing legislators or prove her preferences caused the final provisions.</p>\n<h3 id=\"3-work-reached-the-legislative-record\">3. Work reached the legislative record</h3>\n<p>[Filed coalition letter of June 10, 2022](http[local research file] pp1–2, addresses Senator Umberg and Senate Judiciary and bears 5Rights plus numerous coalition logos. The original [Assembly concurrence analysis, August 30 selection](http[local research file] analysisId <strong>356279</strong>, PDF p4, reproduces distinctive passages from this letter under Arguments in Support. Four normalized matching blocks contain 59, 47, 40 and 34 words; the comparison receipt is <code>5rights-text-comparison.json</code>. These are repeated advocacy passages, not independent confirmations of the underlying health statistics.</p>\n<p>The FARA activity log, Exhibit AB p15, records a June 21 email/fax submission of a coalition support letter to Senate Judiciary. Those records form a strong document-family match; the public record does not include the email attachment hash or message headers proving the filed June 10 copy was the exact submitted version. Nor does filing the letter establish CapConn authored it. Legislative quotation establishes uptake as an argument, not committee endorsement or a legislator&#x27;s changed vote.</p>\n<p>There is a second, narrower example: the log p14 records submission of a Tim Kendall support letter to Senate Judiciary on June 13. The original June 24-indexed [Judiciary analysis](http[local research file] analysisId <strong>352148</strong>, for the June 28 hearing, quotes Kendall&#x27;s support on p19. An exact original Kendall letter was not identified among the thirteen filed informational attachments.</p>\n<h3 id=\"4-the-amendment-corridor-is-now-dated-and-has-specific-holders\">4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders</h3>\n<p>The visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks&#x27; chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to <strong>Aaron Skaggs in Portantino&#x27;s office</strong>, and a UK/California comparison chart goes to <strong>Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit</strong> (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with <strong>Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom&#x27;s office</strong> includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.</p>\n<p>A [filed comparison chart](http[local research file] p1, explicitly presents the bill as proposed for amendment in Senate Appropriations and advocates cross-jurisdiction consistency to ease compliance and establish a global standard. It is undated. It plausibly belongs to the August 5 chart transaction; exact attachment identity is unproved. Its assertions about legal equivalence should not be imported as this investigation&#x27;s own legal conclusion.</p>\n<h3 id=\"5-californias-own-records-show-both-survival-and-narrowing\">5. California&#x27;s own records show both survival and narrowing</h3>\n<p>The official [August 23 Senate analysis](http[local research file] analysisId <strong>355438</strong>, p1, says the August 22 amendments refined definitions, exempted products/services, changed timelines and expanded cure rights. The Assembly concurrence analysis <strong>356279</strong>, pp1–2, itemizes changes including assessments supplied on Attorney General request instead of routine public-agency submission; assessment confidentiality; a qualified 90-day cure opportunity; and replacement of a taskforce with a working group. Its p4 also publishes opponents&#x27; request for guidance and opportunity to correct mistakes. These changes are documentary evidence of a changing proposal, not proof which participant won each concession.</p>\n<p>The [chaptered 2022 Act](http[local research file] chapter320, approved September15, retains under-18 at Civil Code1798.99.30(b)(1). Section1798.99.31(a)(5) permits businesses to apply child protections to everyone instead of estimating age. Thus the historical text does not mandate identity-document submission by every user. This is a consequential qualification to an undifferentiated universal-ID interpretation. No contemporary litigation status was researched here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-ancestry-and-meaningful-negatives\">Acquisition, ancestry and meaningful negatives</h2>\n<p>The official [FARA registrant index](http[local research file] returned 18 rows for7427: ExhibitAB, registration, ExhibitC, two short forms and thirteen informational-material PDFs14–26. No supplemental statement appears in those returned rows. This is bounded index coverage, not proof none exists elsewhere. The web-reader variant of a different FARA index URL failed; an ordinary public HTML route succeeded. No access-control bypass, credentials or outreach were used.</p>\n<p>All thirteen material PDFs were acquired. Full argumentative text was inspected for19,20,21,26; material18 was inspected at first and final pages;17 at first/final pages. Other materials were screened at first-page/title level only. They include background material, a May6 5Rights support letter, a Frances Haugen letter, a July27 5Rights letter, poll tables, and Assembly/Senate floor alerts. Their existence does not make every assertion verified. The original contract and log were read in targeted text and visually at pp14–15,17–19,21,23; other log pages received keyword screening. Legislative analyses were inspected at the precise cited pages, not represented as exhaustively legally reviewed.</p>\n<p><code>5rights-acquisition-receipts.json</code> preserves original URL, selected public form parameters, byte length, response status, local path and SHA-256. California analyses were returned by the site&#x27;s normal public POST form; use the index labels and analysisIds to reproduce the selection. <code>5rights-originals-manifest.json</code> hashes the retained packet files. All documents are source captures; OCR text is subordinate to page images. Original FARA materials and activity descriptions share CapConn filing ancestry. Legislative publication independently establishes what its analysis printed, while quoted coalition content retains coalition ancestry.</p>\n<p>No invoice, line-item account, internal approval message, final tracked-change draft or exact August5 amendment attachment was found in the inspected documents. These absences do not mean no such record exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-next-holder-record-would-change\">What the next holder record would change</h2>\n<p>The highest-value next record is the <strong>August5,2022 CapConn email to Aaron Skaggs with proposed author amendments</strong>, including attachment versions and its associated exchanges from July18 through August11. Likely holders are CapConn&#x27;s engagement archive, 5Rights&#x27; policy archive and the California Senate custodian for Portantino/Appropriations records. It can distinguish who originated an amendment, who merely relayed it, and which draft survived. A substantive public reopening needs an attached correspondence release, legislative bill file or newly indexed exhibit; repeating general searches adds little.</p>\n<p>Next are the June9–10 background-sheet exchanges with McKinley and the June21 coalition-letter transmission/approval chain, held by CapConn, 5Rights and the relevant legislative office/committee record custodians. These can distinguish commissioned drafting from transmission of already-approved coalition material, and routine coordination from exercise of client release permission.</p>\n<p>For funding allocation, 5Rights&#x27; finance custodian and CapConn&#x27;s finance custodian hold the specified monthly invoices, remittance records and ledger coding. These could identify a restricted funding allocation or a general operating pool. Nick Martlew and Doug Subers are evidenced contract signatories in2022, not asserted current record custodians. No proposed request has been sent.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b/5rights-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-55256b9868ae",
          "w3-5r-s-index",
          "w3-5r-s-material-14",
          "w3-5r-s-material-15",
          "w3-5r-s-material-16",
          "w3-5r-s-material-17",
          "w3-5r-s-material-18",
          "w3-5r-s-material-19",
          "w3-5r-s-material-20",
          "w3-5r-s-material-21",
          "w3-5r-s-material-22",
          "w3-5r-s-material-23",
          "w3-5r-s-material-24",
          "w3-5r-s-material-25",
          "w3-5r-s-material-26",
          "w3-5r-s-analysis-352148",
          "w3-5r-s-analysis-355438",
          "w3-5r-s-analysis-356279",
          "w3-5r-s-chapter"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research packet for root integration; captured September 8, 2026 in America/Chicago (some receipt timestamps are September 9 UTC). This is a bounded historical acquisition, not a statement about the Act's present enforceability. Canonical case and reader edition were not changed.\n\n## Finding\n\nThe retained $50,000 contract is now connected to actual filed advocacy materials, dated amendment correspondence and published legislative arguments. The strongest addition is not another funding association. It is an identifiable policy dispute: preserve protection through age 17 while conceding changes elsewhere. The correspondence records 5Rights' chair advocating that position; California's enacted 2022 text retains it. Causation of individual amendments and donor approval remain unresolved.\n\n### 1. Original contract: what the client actually owned, and what the money record actually says\n\nThe original Exhibit AB (see source references) PDF pp22–23, covers May 1–September 30, 2022. Nick Martlew signs as 5Rights executive director on May 24; Doug Subers signs for Capitol Connection on May 17. Its scope includes coalition calls, lobbying, letter development/review and stakeholder-amendment negotiation. It assigns resulting work, including drafts, to 5Rights. The prior-written-consent provision concerns disclosure of non-public information, with legal and already-public exceptions; it is not a separately stated requirement that every legislative position receive editorial approval. Some expenses require advance client approval. Monthly invoices are contractually specified but are not attached.\n\nPDF p21 contains five $10,000 entries under a “Date Received” column. Each gives a range, not a single bank date: June 2–29; July 18–August 12; August 2–12; August 27–September 21; September 22–October 4, 2022. These are registrant-reported receipts, not inspected bank transfers. The five entries total $50,000; their overlap should be preserved rather than silently regularized into five monthly payment dates. Work-product ownership, release permission and actual approval decisions must remain separate.\n\nThis refresh enriches existing **e157**, not a new money edge. The original source duplicates **src-55256b9868ae**. No upstream earmark was established; the 2023 Oak award cannot fund this chain by chronological assumption.\n\n### 2. A real client-side decision, recorded in two contemporary letters\n\nKidron to Anthony Portantino, August 3, 2022 (see source references) p1, thanks him for a meeting and says she worked with her team and the bill's authors on amendments responding to his issue and stakeholder needs. She seeks support for retaining under-18 coverage and alignment with the UK code. This is a named participant's contemporary account, subsequently filed by CapConn, rather than independent verification of everything described.\n\nKidron to Henry Stern, August 3, 2022 (see source references) p1, is more discriminating: it says industry participants sought an under-13 or under-16 boundary, asks Stern to preserve under-18 coverage, and reports amendments addressing Portantino's and other stakeholders' feedback. It also thanks Stern for willingness to become a co-author. The two letters bear House of Lords stationery. That establishes the institutional presentation used, not a UK-government funding or instruction chain. The letters do not identify which industry party sought which age cutoff.\n\nThe files distinguish a substantive preference from generic sponsorship. They support an active bargaining role for Kidron; they do not show her directing legislators or prove her preferences caused the final provisions.\n\n### 3. Work reached the legislative record\n\nFiled coalition letter of June 10, 2022 (see source references) pp1–2, addresses Senator Umberg and Senate Judiciary and bears 5Rights plus numerous coalition logos. The original Assembly concurrence analysis, August 30 selection (see source references) analysisId **356279**, PDF p4, reproduces distinctive passages from this letter under Arguments in Support. Four normalized matching blocks contain 59, 47, 40 and 34 words; the comparison receipt is `5rights-text-comparison.json`. These are repeated advocacy passages, not independent confirmations of the underlying health statistics.\n\nThe FARA activity log, Exhibit AB p15, records a June 21 email/fax submission of a coalition support letter to Senate Judiciary. Those records form a strong document-family match; the public record does not include the email attachment hash or message headers proving the filed June 10 copy was the exact submitted version. Nor does filing the letter establish CapConn authored it. Legislative quotation establishes uptake as an argument, not committee endorsement or a legislator's changed vote.\n\nThere is a second, narrower example: the log p14 records submission of a Tim Kendall support letter to Senate Judiciary on June 13. The original June 24-indexed Judiciary analysis (see source references) analysisId **352148**, for the June 28 hearing, quotes Kendall's support on p19. An exact original Kendall letter was not identified among the thirteen filed informational attachments.\n\n### 4. The amendment corridor is now dated and has specific holders\n\nThe visually checked log provides better next-record selectors than a generic request for correspondence. On June 9–10, drafts of a committee background sheet go to Shannon McKinley, Wicks' chief of staff (p14). On August 5, proposed author amendments go to **Aaron Skaggs in Portantino's office**, and a UK/California comparison chart goes to **Eric Dang in the Senate President pro Tempore policy unit** (p18). On August 10, a meeting/email with **Christine Aurre in Governor Newsom's office** includes a summary of amendments; August 15 and 23 entries describe updates responding to opposition concerns (pp18–19). June and July entries record repeated stakeholder negotiations, but a full actor-to-clause attribution was not completed in this pass.\n\nA filed comparison chart (see source references) p1, explicitly presents the bill as proposed for amendment in Senate Appropriations and advocates cross-jurisdiction consistency to ease compliance and establish a global standard. It is undated. It plausibly belongs to the August 5 chart transaction; exact attachment identity is unproved. Its assertions about legal equivalence should not be imported as this investigation's own legal conclusion.\n\n### 5. California's own records show both survival and narrowing\n\nThe official August 23 Senate analysis (see source references) analysisId **355438**, p1, says the August 22 amendments refined definitions, exempted products/services, changed timelines and expanded cure rights. The Assembly concurrence analysis **356279**, pp1–2, itemizes changes including assessments supplied on Attorney General request instead of routine public-agency submission; assessment confidentiality; a qualified 90-day cure opportunity; and replacement of a taskforce with a working group. Its p4 also publishes opponents' request for guidance and opportunity to correct mistakes. These changes are documentary evidence of a changing proposal, not proof which participant won each concession.\n\nThe chaptered 2022 Act (see source references) chapter320, approved September15, retains under-18 at Civil Code1798.99.30(b)(1). Section1798.99.31(a)(5) permits businesses to apply child protections to everyone instead of estimating age. Thus the historical text does not mandate identity-document submission by every user. This is a consequential qualification to an undifferentiated universal-ID interpretation. No contemporary litigation status was researched here.\n\n## Acquisition, ancestry and meaningful negatives\n\nThe official FARA registrant index (see source references) returned 18 rows for7427: ExhibitAB, registration, ExhibitC, two short forms and thirteen informational-material PDFs14–26. No supplemental statement appears in those returned rows. This is bounded index coverage, not proof none exists elsewhere. The web-reader variant of a different FARA index URL failed; an ordinary public HTML route succeeded. No access-control bypass, credentials or outreach were used.\n\nAll thirteen material PDFs were acquired. Full argumentative text was inspected for19,20,21,26; material18 was inspected at first and final pages;17 at first/final pages. Other materials were screened at first-page/title level only. They include background material, a May6 5Rights support letter, a Frances Haugen letter, a July27 5Rights letter, poll tables, and Assembly/Senate floor alerts. Their existence does not make every assertion verified. The original contract and log were read in targeted text and visually at pp14–15,17–19,21,23; other log pages received keyword screening. Legislative analyses were inspected at the precise cited pages, not represented as exhaustively legally reviewed.\n\n`5rights-acquisition-receipts.json` preserves original URL, selected public form parameters, byte length, response status, local path and SHA-256. California analyses were returned by the site's normal public POST form; use the index labels and analysisIds to reproduce the selection. `5rights-originals-manifest.json` hashes the retained packet files. All documents are source captures; OCR text is subordinate to page images. Original FARA materials and activity descriptions share CapConn filing ancestry. Legislative publication independently establishes what its analysis printed, while quoted coalition content retains coalition ancestry.\n\nNo invoice, line-item account, internal approval message, final tracked-change draft or exact August5 amendment attachment was found in the inspected documents. These absences do not mean no such record exists.\n\n## What the next holder record would change\n\nThe highest-value next record is the **August5,2022 CapConn email to Aaron Skaggs with proposed author amendments**, including attachment versions and its associated exchanges from July18 through August11. Likely holders are CapConn's engagement archive, 5Rights' policy archive and the California Senate custodian for Portantino/Appropriations records. It can distinguish who originated an amendment, who merely relayed it, and which draft survived. A substantive public reopening needs an attached correspondence release, legislative bill file or newly indexed exhibit; repeating general searches adds little.\n\nNext are the June9–10 background-sheet exchanges with McKinley and the June21 coalition-letter transmission/approval chain, held by CapConn, 5Rights and the relevant legislative office/committee record custodians. These can distinguish commissioned drafting from transmission of already-approved coalition material, and routine coordination from exercise of client release permission.\n\nFor funding allocation, 5Rights' finance custodian and CapConn's finance custodian hold the specified monthly invoices, remittance records and ledger coding. These could identify a restricted funding allocation or a general operating pool. Nick Martlew and Doug Subers are evidenced contract signatories in2022, not asserted current record custodians. No proposed request has been sent.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-5rights-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings",
        "title": "ICMEC counterparts: money, participation and an observed drafting step",
        "description": "Read 8 September 2026 local time. Nine original documents/pages were captured, hashed and read at the locators in icmec-candidate.json. The international 36MB report exceeded the web reader limit; one ordinary public download succeeded. The Australian report also succeeded through ordinary public download. icmec-capture-manifest.json preserves the bytes and ",
        "html": "<p>Read 8 September 2026 local time. Nine original documents/pages were captured, hashed and read at the locators in icmec-candidate.json. The international 36MB report exceeded the web reader limit; one ordinary public download succeeded. The Australian report also succeeded through ordinary public download. icmec-capture-manifest.json preserves the bytes and URLs.</p>\n<p>Westpac&#x27;s 2024 programme report records a $25 million six-year commitment beginning in 2021 for ICMEC data and knowledge sharing. Its Australian-project section names Lighthouse, a data application for banks and payment platforms, and Westpac participation in the SaferAI launch. The report uses both commitment and provided language; this is not a verified payment schedule. Its outcome footnotes explicitly say recipient information was not independently verified. The bank website&#x27;s three-year grant description and this six-year programme description need the original agreement and amendments, not arithmetic invention. AUD is inferred from the Australian reporting context; the line itself prints only a dollar sign.</p>\n<p>The September 2020 Westpac response plan already promised $25 million for cross-border and cross-industry data sharing after AUSTRAC&#x27;s proceedings. This amount is a precursor, not another funding flow to add. The recovered plan is bank-issued, not a court order mandating a grant. Westpac&#x27;s April2026 update reports FY25 data projects supported by its funding and separately describes continued SaferAI convening; it supplies no coalition-specific allocation or editorial approval term.</p>\n<p>ICMEC Australia&#x27;s own current account says it began as an affiliate in late2021 and now operates independently, with its own governance. It also describes foundational funding ending and a search for ongoing sponsors and project support. That creates a specific renewal/dependence question. It does not establish that the Australian and international organisations have common current command. The transition instrument remains missing.</p>\n<p>SaferAI&#x27;s terms, drafted September2025 and circulated January2026, allocate membership and partnership determination and project guidance to ICMEC Australia in collaboration with members. They also permit a partner category that participates without normal public website listing or project attribution. This proves the public roster is not designed as a complete attendance record; it does not prove that a particular unlisted institution participated. Attribution consent, output clearance, attendance and the category register are the decisive next records. Meeting confidentiality alone is not evidence of improper conduct.</p>\n<p>The Australian 2024-25 impact report describes operational Lighthouse searching and analytic functions for suspected child-exploitation data, with financial-sector and law-enforcement uses. It lists Jodie Arthur both as a non-executive director and a Westpac financial-crime executive. This is a resource-plus-governance connection. It does not establish donor nomination rights, her vote on any policy, or a bank action taken from an alert. Provider licences, provenance, access agreements, correction rules and de-identified alert-to-action records could distinguish those steps without seeking sensitive underlying data.</p>\n<p>Colm Gannon&#x27;s 4May2026 article advocates device-centred age signals, arguing for reduced repeated disclosure, while acknowledging friction and circumvention. It reports a meeting with Mongolian parliamentarians and officials. This is actual public advocacy; third-party technical implementation claims in the article were not adopted as independent facts. No Westpac age-policy earmark or US drafting instruction was found.</p>\n<p>Virginia&#x27;s JCOTS annual report records Cunningham&#x27;s November6,2024 device-based age presentation and the commission&#x27;s questions. Its December3 proceedings explicitly say Senator Craig&#x27;s device-age bill concept resulted from that presentation and that she submitted a DLS draft request. This is an unusually clear institutional counterpart for agenda uptake. It is not proof of enacted legislation or authorship of every later provision. The original drafting request and resulting versions are highly targeted next evidence.</p>\n<p>The international ICMEC2024 report lists digital age assurance among its programmes and identifies general2024 donors. That refreshes the earlier2023 general acknowledgement snapshot, but it does not disclose amounts or any age-policy earmark. Named general support must not be attributed to the Australian operation or to a specific bill without allocation records.</p>\n<p>Targeted UK follow-up recovered official schedule pages for Sobel&#x27;s September8 motion, not its outcome. The Hansard and bills open routes failed; a separate official schedule search did not supply the missing outcome. Preserve scheduled stage. Do not rerun identical failed routes or call introduction established.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b/icmec-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-icmec-s-us-impact2024",
          "w3-icmec-s-au-impact2025",
          "w3-icmec-s-westpac2024",
          "w3-icmec-s-westpac2025",
          "w3-icmec-s-saferai-tor",
          "w3-icmec-s-virginia2024",
          "w3-icmec-s-au-about",
          "w3-icmec-s-au-age",
          "w3-icmec-s-westpac-response"
        ],
        "markdown": "Read 8 September 2026 local time. Nine original documents/pages were captured, hashed and read at the locators in icmec-candidate.json. The international 36MB report exceeded the web reader limit; one ordinary public download succeeded. The Australian report also succeeded through ordinary public download. icmec-capture-manifest.json preserves the bytes and URLs.\n\nWestpac's 2024 programme report records a $25 million six-year commitment beginning in 2021 for ICMEC data and knowledge sharing. Its Australian-project section names Lighthouse, a data application for banks and payment platforms, and Westpac participation in the SaferAI launch. The report uses both commitment and provided language; this is not a verified payment schedule. Its outcome footnotes explicitly say recipient information was not independently verified. The bank website's three-year grant description and this six-year programme description need the original agreement and amendments, not arithmetic invention. AUD is inferred from the Australian reporting context; the line itself prints only a dollar sign.\n\nThe September 2020 Westpac response plan already promised $25 million for cross-border and cross-industry data sharing after AUSTRAC's proceedings. This amount is a precursor, not another funding flow to add. The recovered plan is bank-issued, not a court order mandating a grant. Westpac's April2026 update reports FY25 data projects supported by its funding and separately describes continued SaferAI convening; it supplies no coalition-specific allocation or editorial approval term.\n\nICMEC Australia's own current account says it began as an affiliate in late2021 and now operates independently, with its own governance. It also describes foundational funding ending and a search for ongoing sponsors and project support. That creates a specific renewal/dependence question. It does not establish that the Australian and international organisations have common current command. The transition instrument remains missing.\n\nSaferAI's terms, drafted September2025 and circulated January2026, allocate membership and partnership determination and project guidance to ICMEC Australia in collaboration with members. They also permit a partner category that participates without normal public website listing or project attribution. This proves the public roster is not designed as a complete attendance record; it does not prove that a particular unlisted institution participated. Attribution consent, output clearance, attendance and the category register are the decisive next records. Meeting confidentiality alone is not evidence of improper conduct.\n\nThe Australian 2024-25 impact report describes operational Lighthouse searching and analytic functions for suspected child-exploitation data, with financial-sector and law-enforcement uses. It lists Jodie Arthur both as a non-executive director and a Westpac financial-crime executive. This is a resource-plus-governance connection. It does not establish donor nomination rights, her vote on any policy, or a bank action taken from an alert. Provider licences, provenance, access agreements, correction rules and de-identified alert-to-action records could distinguish those steps without seeking sensitive underlying data.\n\nColm Gannon's 4May2026 article advocates device-centred age signals, arguing for reduced repeated disclosure, while acknowledging friction and circumvention. It reports a meeting with Mongolian parliamentarians and officials. This is actual public advocacy; third-party technical implementation claims in the article were not adopted as independent facts. No Westpac age-policy earmark or US drafting instruction was found.\n\nVirginia's JCOTS annual report records Cunningham's November6,2024 device-based age presentation and the commission's questions. Its December3 proceedings explicitly say Senator Craig's device-age bill concept resulted from that presentation and that she submitted a DLS draft request. This is an unusually clear institutional counterpart for agenda uptake. It is not proof of enacted legislation or authorship of every later provision. The original drafting request and resulting versions are highly targeted next evidence.\n\nThe international ICMEC2024 report lists digital age assurance among its programmes and identifies general2024 donors. That refreshes the earlier2023 general acknowledgement snapshot, but it does not disclose amounts or any age-policy earmark. Named general support must not be attributed to the Australian operation or to a specific bill without allocation records.\n\nTargeted UK follow-up recovered official schedule pages for Sobel's September8 motion, not its outcome. The Hansard and bills open routes failed; a separate official schedule search did not supply the missing outcome. Preserve scheduled stage. Do not rerun identical failed routes or call introduction established.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-icmec-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings",
        "title": "Oak → WeProtect: where resources become decisions",
        "description": "The new evidence identifies institutional budget rights, an amended funding route, a commissioned research product and a named Oak contribution to that product. It does not identify Alan Parker as the decisionmaker behind the two existing grants, or establish a donor veto over WeProtect publications. The useful geometry is two partly connected chains: Oak → ",
        "html": "<p>Nova · 8 September 2026 · Bounded public-acquisition return against case-r6</p>\n<p>The new evidence identifies institutional budget rights, an amended funding route, a commissioned research product and a named Oak contribution to that product. It does not identify Alan Parker as the decisionmaker behind the two existing grants, or establish a donor veto over WeProtect publications. The useful geometry is two partly connected chains: Oak → Safe Futures Hub → commissioned review, with named advisory input; and external donors → Dutch WeProtect foundation → budget-constrained UK operating company. Their exact grant instruments still matter.</p>\n<h2 id=\"oaks-public-process-identifies-a-gate-not-a-named-grant-approver\">Oak&#x27;s public process identifies a gate, not a named grant approver</h2>\n<p>Oak&#x27;s [three-page grant-process guide](http[local research file] pp2–3, describes programme-officer screening and collaborative application development, review involving finance and programme leadership, and a recommendation to unspecified senior foundation members. Both parties sign a grant letter before funds are wired. The guide is undated; its URL contains 2019/11 and the current grant-making page still links it.</p>\n<p>The [current grant-making page](http[local research file] says renewals are separate awards, core support is unrestricted, and applicants are told who will decide. Its general 20%-of-organisational-budget / 50%-of-project-budget guidelines permit exceptions discussed with staff. These are policy statements, not proof that either named grant complied with a ratio or retained a specific termination right. The [FAQ](http[local research file] also describes recipient-led strategy and advance discussion of funding exits. This supplies a serious alternative explanation: selection of aligned, independently directed recipients followed by ordinary financial oversight.</p>\n<p>Missing: the signed 2023 5Rights and 2025 WeProtect letters, concept notes, approval record and applicable renewal/reporting clauses. No new personal direction edge for Alan Parker is proposed. Existing e159–e161 remain intact.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-operating-constraint-is-inside-weprotect\">The operating constraint is inside WeProtect</h2>\n<p>The [director-signed 2023 accounts](http[local research file] pp10,15,17,21, separate Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance (Dutch registration 76585379) from its controlled UK company. They disclose a 2021 agreement requiring a submitted annual budget, prior written permission for spending outside it, and a discretionary deduction of underspend from later grants. The €1,520,482 UK subgrant is an internal 2023 expenditure, eliminated in consolidation.</p>\n<p>Page17 also records a revealing amendment: Together for Girls&#x27; original $400,000 Safe Futures commitment became $100,000 when the remaining $300,000 moved to “Swiss Philanthropy”; the replacement $430,000 agreement added $130,000, for March2024–February2027. Do not add $400,000 and $430,000. Exact Swiss legal identity, hosted fund and upstream donor remain unestablished.</p>\n<p>The source is byte-identical to the retained September7 PDF: newly inspected content, not independent confirmation. Its final page contains an auditor-report heading without a substantive opinion; this return does not call it independently audited. [December2023 minutes](http[local research file] separately record Policy Board approval of the 2024 budget.</p>\n<h2 id=\"oak-support-reaches-an-actual-commissioned-review\">Oak support reaches an actual commissioned review</h2>\n<p>The <a>Safe Futures team page</a>.</p>\n<p>The [2024 evidence review](http[local research file] goes further. Page105 expressly identifies Safe Futures Hub as commissioner, Oak as supporter, three lead authors, and a named group of advisers/key informants—including Duch—credited with shaping the review. WeProtect&#x27;s Iain Drennan appears in leadership and Shailey Hingorani in the core team. Page104 describes over 750 comments, suggestions and edits being reviewed. Pages17–18 distinguish systematically screened studies from additional literature; stakeholder feedback contributed particularly to the latter.</p>\n<p>This earns a contribution relationship to a specific output. It does not identify Duch&#x27;s individual comments, an enforced editorial condition, a veto, or final manuscript approver. A broad expert consultation with recipient-selected content remains compatible with the record. The [publication page](http[local research file] dates publication to 22 October2024 and its update to 15 September2025. No attribution of NetID adoption or a specific statute is made.</p>\n<p>The later [2025 guidance framework](http[local research file] pp3,9–11,79–80, is a useful discrimination check. It acknowledges Oak support, credits Arti Mohan as author, and describes leadership/core and external draft review. The three advisory members specifically thanked for direct contribution are Manjeer Mukherjee, Sabine Rakotomalala and Shanaaz Mathews. Duch is not among those three. Generic advisory membership must not be projected into every publication. The guidance calls its tools adaptable rather than prescriptive; this is not a binding policy instrument.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-european-research-to-advocacy-route-is-also-explicit\">The European research-to-advocacy route is also explicit</h2>\n<p>WeProtect&#x27;s [2023 annual review](http[local research file] pp5–7, identifies the Oak-supported Safe Futures launch and describes commissioning research, including the Economist Impact European survey. It reports using that survey in direct engagement with more than 60 national policymakers. The accounts&#x27; narrative links it to targeted government engagement and ECLAG-letter work. These are statements from the same institution, not two independent confirmations of influence or adoption.</p>\n<p>The [original European survey](http[local research file] pp3,7–8,20, identifies Economist Impact&#x27;s role and February–March2023 fieldwork. It limits its population to retrospective accounts from 2,000 eighteen-year-olds across four countries. The questionnaire derived from the 2021 study; the original questionnaire/IRB record was not acquired. It expressly distinguishes expert advice from endorsement. The commissioning SOW, payment/funding code, draft changes and final signoff remain holder records. No Oak earmark to this survey is established.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-boundaries-and-merge-instructions\">Custody, boundaries and merge instructions</h2>\n<p>The packet contains 13 proposed nodes, 21 relationships, 13 source records and five parked holder-record leads. All new IDs use w3-oak-. The capture manifest stores exact URLs, response states, raw filenames, extracted-text filenames, sizes and SHA256 values. Reading extent is source-specific: the 128-page review was read for methods and production/review credits; the 83-page guidance for methodology, scope and named reviewers. Their scientific evidence bases were not audited.</p>\n<p>The compressed review URL returned HTTP403 once. One official alternate filename yielded the report; the inaccessible and accessible files are not asserted byte-identical. An erroneous Oak team URL failed once; the indexed official team page supplied the legitimate substitute. Targeted grant-letter and Swiss Safe Futures searches did not yield the missing instruments. Unrelated Oak–Swiss Philanthropy Foundation collaborations do not establish the donor behind this particular agreement.</p>\n<p>Keep the existing umbrella WeProtect node. Add Dutch and UK legal actors separately; do not turn every member into a subsidiary. The new specific Policy Board is a component of the old wp-boards grouping, not an alias for both boards. Do not automatically merge “Swiss Philanthropy” with a named foundation, hosted fund or Oak. Neither the internal subgrant nor the amendment produces additional external money by being mapped twice. The already retained 2024 comparative-account mismatch remains unresolved; this lane does not invent a financial trend.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are concrete: named award letters; the 2021 Dutch-to-UK agreement and actual budget exception decisions; the Together for Girls amendment and replacement Swiss fund identifier; the review&#x27;s tracked drafts and signoff; and the European survey SOW and cost code. No outreach, paid access, publication, automation or canonical-case change was performed.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b/oak-weprotect-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w3-oak-grant-process",
          "w3-oak-grant-making",
          "w3-oak-faq",
          "w3-oak-wp-accounts-2023",
          "w3-oak-wp-minutes-dec2023",
          "w3-oak-wp-review2023",
          "w3-oak-european-survey",
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-about",
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-review",
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-guidance",
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-review-substitute",
          "w3-oak-team",
          "w3-oak-safe-futures-publication"
        ],
        "markdown": "Nova · 8 September 2026 · Bounded public-acquisition return against case-r6\n\nThe new evidence identifies institutional budget rights, an amended funding route, a commissioned research product and a named Oak contribution to that product. It does not identify Alan Parker as the decisionmaker behind the two existing grants, or establish a donor veto over WeProtect publications. The useful geometry is two partly connected chains: Oak → Safe Futures Hub → commissioned review, with named advisory input; and external donors → Dutch WeProtect foundation → budget-constrained UK operating company. Their exact grant instruments still matter.\n\n## Oak's public process identifies a gate, not a named grant approver\n\nOak's three-page grant-process guide (see source references) pp2–3, describes programme-officer screening and collaborative application development, review involving finance and programme leadership, and a recommendation to unspecified senior foundation members. Both parties sign a grant letter before funds are wired. The guide is undated; its URL contains 2019/11 and the current grant-making page still links it.\n\nThe current grant-making page (see source references) says renewals are separate awards, core support is unrestricted, and applicants are told who will decide. Its general 20%-of-organisational-budget / 50%-of-project-budget guidelines permit exceptions discussed with staff. These are policy statements, not proof that either named grant complied with a ratio or retained a specific termination right. The FAQ (see source references) also describes recipient-led strategy and advance discussion of funding exits. This supplies a serious alternative explanation: selection of aligned, independently directed recipients followed by ordinary financial oversight.\n\nMissing: the signed 2023 5Rights and 2025 WeProtect letters, concept notes, approval record and applicable renewal/reporting clauses. No new personal direction edge for Alan Parker is proposed. Existing e159–e161 remain intact.\n\n## The operating constraint is inside WeProtect\n\nThe director-signed 2023 accounts (see source references) pp10,15,17,21, separate Stichting The WePROTECT Global Alliance (Dutch registration 76585379) from its controlled UK company. They disclose a 2021 agreement requiring a submitted annual budget, prior written permission for spending outside it, and a discretionary deduction of underspend from later grants. The €1,520,482 UK subgrant is an internal 2023 expenditure, eliminated in consolidation.\n\nPage17 also records a revealing amendment: Together for Girls' original $400,000 Safe Futures commitment became $100,000 when the remaining $300,000 moved to “Swiss Philanthropy”; the replacement $430,000 agreement added $130,000, for March2024–February2027. Do not add $400,000 and $430,000. Exact Swiss legal identity, hosted fund and upstream donor remain unestablished.\n\nThe source is byte-identical to the retained September7 PDF: newly inspected content, not independent confirmation. Its final page contains an auditor-report heading without a substantive opinion; this return does not call it independently audited. December2023 minutes (see source references) separately record Policy Board approval of the 2024 budget.\n\n## Oak support reaches an actual commissioned review\n\nThe Safe Futures team page.\n\nThe 2024 evidence review (see source references) goes further. Page105 expressly identifies Safe Futures Hub as commissioner, Oak as supporter, three lead authors, and a named group of advisers/key informants—including Duch—credited with shaping the review. WeProtect's Iain Drennan appears in leadership and Shailey Hingorani in the core team. Page104 describes over 750 comments, suggestions and edits being reviewed. Pages17–18 distinguish systematically screened studies from additional literature; stakeholder feedback contributed particularly to the latter.\n\nThis earns a contribution relationship to a specific output. It does not identify Duch's individual comments, an enforced editorial condition, a veto, or final manuscript approver. A broad expert consultation with recipient-selected content remains compatible with the record. The publication page (see source references) dates publication to 22 October2024 and its update to 15 September2025. No attribution of NetID adoption or a specific statute is made.\n\nThe later 2025 guidance framework (see source references) pp3,9–11,79–80, is a useful discrimination check. It acknowledges Oak support, credits Arti Mohan as author, and describes leadership/core and external draft review. The three advisory members specifically thanked for direct contribution are Manjeer Mukherjee, Sabine Rakotomalala and Shanaaz Mathews. Duch is not among those three. Generic advisory membership must not be projected into every publication. The guidance calls its tools adaptable rather than prescriptive; this is not a binding policy instrument.\n\n## The European research-to-advocacy route is also explicit\n\nWeProtect's 2023 annual review (see source references) pp5–7, identifies the Oak-supported Safe Futures launch and describes commissioning research, including the Economist Impact European survey. It reports using that survey in direct engagement with more than 60 national policymakers. The accounts' narrative links it to targeted government engagement and ECLAG-letter work. These are statements from the same institution, not two independent confirmations of influence or adoption.\n\nThe original European survey (see source references) pp3,7–8,20, identifies Economist Impact's role and February–March2023 fieldwork. It limits its population to retrospective accounts from 2,000 eighteen-year-olds across four countries. The questionnaire derived from the 2021 study; the original questionnaire/IRB record was not acquired. It expressly distinguishes expert advice from endorsement. The commissioning SOW, payment/funding code, draft changes and final signoff remain holder records. No Oak earmark to this survey is established.\n\n## Custody, boundaries and merge instructions\n\nThe packet contains 13 proposed nodes, 21 relationships, 13 source records and five parked holder-record leads. All new IDs use w3-oak-. The capture manifest stores exact URLs, response states, raw filenames, extracted-text filenames, sizes and SHA256 values. Reading extent is source-specific: the 128-page review was read for methods and production/review credits; the 83-page guidance for methodology, scope and named reviewers. Their scientific evidence bases were not audited.\n\nThe compressed review URL returned HTTP403 once. One official alternate filename yielded the report; the inaccessible and accessible files are not asserted byte-identical. An erroneous Oak team URL failed once; the indexed official team page supplied the legitimate substitute. Targeted grant-letter and Swiss Safe Futures searches did not yield the missing instruments. Unrelated Oak–Swiss Philanthropy Foundation collaborations do not establish the donor behind this particular agreement.\n\nKeep the existing umbrella WeProtect node. Add Dutch and UK legal actors separately; do not turn every member into a subsidiary. The new specific Policy Board is a component of the old wp-boards grouping, not an alias for both boards. Do not automatically merge “Swiss Philanthropy” with a named foundation, hosted fund or Oak. Neither the internal subgrant nor the amendment produces additional external money by being mapped twice. The already retained 2024 comparative-account mismatch remains unresolved; this lane does not invent a financial trend.\n\nThe next discriminating records are concrete: named award letters; the 2021 Dutch-to-UK agreement and actual budget exception decisions; the Together for Girls amendment and replacement Swiss fund identifier; the review's tracked drafts and signoff; and the European survey SOW and cost code. No outreach, paid access, publication, automation or canonical-case change was performed.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-oak-weprotect-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings",
        "title": "Opposing intervention: a filed vendor route, then a contract frontier",
        "description": "Ready for independent review. This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, ",
        "html": "<p><strong>Ready for independent review.</strong> This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, an original donor&#x27;s instruction, or the effect of the spending. Public records retrieved September 8, 2026. No messages, paid acquisition or publication.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-money-demonstrably-reaches\">What the money demonstrably reaches</h2>\n<p>LTF&#x27;s Q1 Schedule B, page 13, reports a <strong>$5 million contribution to Think Big on February 24, 2026</strong>, transaction <code>SB23.I31388</code>. This is a component of the retained <code>e147</code> $40 million contributions-to-other-committees aggregate. It is not a new external donation and is not a transfer to Build American AI. The source is the exact original already represented by <code>src-6460d3b558f5</code>; alias it instead of manufacturing corroboration. [LTF original](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The controlling March return is Think Big&#x27;s <strong>May 20 amended April monthly report</strong>, covering March 1–31. Its seven Bores-opposition Schedule E rows total <strong>$787,404.29</strong>. Each names Lantern as payee and checks opposition, House NY-12, primary 2026. The filed dissemination and disbursement-or-obligation dates are different fields; their order is preserved below. These are reported independent expenditures, not independently verified bank settlements or receipts from a creator. [Amended return, pages 11–14](http[local research file]</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Transaction</th>\n<th>PDF page</th>\n<th>Filed purpose</th>\n<th>USD</th>\n<th>Dissemination</th>\n<th>Disbursement or obligation</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4218</code></td>\n<td>11</td>\n<td>DIGITAL MEDIA PRODUCTION</td>\n<td>35,000.00</td>\n<td>2026-03-01</td>\n<td>2026-03-02</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4219</code></td>\n<td>11</td>\n<td>DIGITAL MEDIA PLACEMENT</td>\n<td>171,136.11</td>\n<td>2026-03-01</td>\n<td>2026-03-02</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4220</code></td>\n<td>12</td>\n<td>PRINT ADVERTISING</td>\n<td>111,136.11</td>\n<td>2026-03-01</td>\n<td>2026-03-02</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4221</code></td>\n<td>13</td>\n<td>TEXTING</td>\n<td>50,000.00</td>\n<td>2026-03-12</td>\n<td>2026-03-11</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4222</code></td>\n<td>13</td>\n<td>DIGITAL ADVERTISING / PRODUCTION</td>\n<td>256,691.67</td>\n<td>2026-03-15</td>\n<td>2026-03-16</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4223</code></td>\n<td>14</td>\n<td>PRINT ADVERTISING</td>\n<td>83,799.29</td>\n<td>2026-03-14</td>\n<td>2026-03-16</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><code>SE.4224</code></td>\n<td>14</td>\n<td>CABLE ADVERTISING / PRODUCTION</td>\n<td>79,641.11</td>\n<td>2026-03-30</td>\n<td>2026-03-27</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The same Schedule E includes $277,827.78 for digital placement <strong>supporting Jesse Jackson Jr</strong> (<code>SE.4217</code>, p12). That is excluded from the Bores total. Together they reconcile to March independent expenditures of $1,065,232.07. These are the ordinary return&#x27;s rows, not rapid notices added onto an ordinary return.</p>\n<p>Schedule B pages 7–9 separately report <strong>$215,037 of operating disbursements to Lantern</strong>: polling $121,500; research $13,500; management consulting $15,012; strategy consulting $20,025; political strategy consulting $25,000; media production $20,000. The candidate fields are blank; several rows carry an “Other 2025” election label despite March 2026 disbursement dates. The record does not allocate all this work to Bores. A separate $30,976 direct disbursement to Manhattan Strategies makes total operating spending $246,013; it does not establish that firm as Lantern&#x27;s subcontractor. Operating plus independent expenditures reconcile to the return&#x27;s $1,311,245.07 total disbursements. These partitions are not additional flows to add onto that total.</p>\n<p>Funding is also not an earmark. Think Big&#x27;s 2025 year-end receipt pages disclose $500,000 from Ronald Conway on October 21 and $5 million from LTF on December 15. Its first reported Lantern expenditure on December 10 predates that December LTF receipt. Accordingly, even the record&#x27;s short payment route cannot justify assigning every early ad to that particular transfer or to one LTF donor. This pass uses the February contribution followed by the March operation and makes no exact-dollar tracing claim. [Year-end return, pp2,6–8](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-amendment-is-consequential\">The amendment is consequential</h2>\n<p>The original April 20 return left the $13,500 Lantern purpose blank and used “political consulting” for a $25,000 item. The FEC&#x27;s April 26 request asked for the missing purpose and a clearer description. The May 20 amendment supplies research and political strategy consulting respectively. The March expense amounts and selected Schedule E rows are unchanged. The public index shows this amendment; the original must not be presented as the current uncorrected disclosure. The request concerns those two reporting descriptions, not a Commission finding about vendor ownership or unlawful concealment. [Original](http[local research file] [FEC request](http[local research file] [filing index](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-operation-was-trying-to-do\">What the operation was trying to do</h2>\n<p>City &amp; State&#x27;s January 26 report records Josh Vlasto, working with both LTF and Think Big, criticizing Bores&#x27; state AI approach and advocating national solutions. It also records the campaign&#x27;s dispute over the ads&#x27; ICE/Palantir claims. This is an attributable account of the policy conflict, not evidence that those attack allegations were true. The original linked December YouTube page yielded only the title <strong>Alex Bores is Wrong for AI &amp; Wrong for Congress</strong>. No video or transcript was reviewed and no particular March row was matched to that creative. No claim here establishes which March ad wording aired. [City &amp; State](http[local research file] [linked original page, metadata only](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The strongest new result therefore concerns purchased electoral capacity and service types. It does not close the retained Build American AI → SM4 → creator-prospect offer-only route. Public First Action remains a different entity with a different funding instrument; no inference here moves Anthropic&#x27;s restricted gift into election spending.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-holder-frontier-with-rival-explanations\">The holder frontier, with rival explanations</h2>\n<p>The May 5 CLC/Gonsalves-Brown complaint alleges that Think Big used Lantern to obscure ultimate providers. The inspected passage derives its expenditure case from FEC records; it is not an independent payment witness. Its ownership, exclusivity, lack of arm&#x27;s-length dealing and unlawful-concealment conclusions remain <strong>complainant allegations and inferences</strong>, not findings adopted by this pass. Its all-period totals were not recomputed or integrated. Read pp7–11 and 15–18; the other case, exhibits and complete current enforcement docket were not reviewed. [Complaint](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>A general contractor may coordinate media, polling and consultants under an ordinary commercial agreement. Alternatively, a vendor may be integrated with a campaign and function mainly as a payment intermediary. The contract, actual personnel overlap and subvendor instructions discriminate those explanations. The FEC&#x27;s historical Advisory Opinion 1983-25 permitted less detailed reporting for the specific separately operated, arms-length media arrangement described there, with attention to other clients and independent principals. This does not decide Lantern&#x27;s legal status; it explains why vendor concentration alone is insufficient. [Official opinion, pp2–3](http[local research file]</p>\n<p><strong>Stop here:</strong> the specific next record is Think Big/Lantern&#x27;s executed March agreement and invoice/placement bundle keyed to <code>SE.4218</code>–<code>SE.4224</code> (excluding <code>SE.4217</code>). It should identify the commissioned creative, media placement orders, actual producers and approval rights, with a subvendor ledger to reconcile net fees against pass-through costs. Think Big and Lantern are the identified holders; a publicly released station order tied to one transaction could reopen a smaller part of the route. No holder request was sent. A shell-company accusation, complete creator fee or policy-effect claim cannot replace those records.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-integration\">Custody and integration</h2>\n<p><code>opposing-candidate.json</code> contains five proposed edges, four new nodes, one holder lead, source scopes, local capture hashes and the seven-row extraction. Candidate source <code>w3-opp-s-ltf-q1</code> aliases retained <code>src-6460d3b558f5</code>; contribution edge <code>w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig</code> is a subset of retained <code>e147</code>. Existing <code>ltf</code>, <code>buildai</code>, <code>sm4</code>, <code>pitchcreator</code> and <code>publicfirst</code> remain distinct and are not recreated. No existing Think Big, Lantern or Bores node was found by label/ID scan of r6.</p>\n<p>Text and rendered-page files derive from the corresponding PDFs and are not extra independent sources. The complaint&#x27;s cited FEC originals, its appendix-based claims, and summaries of that complaint share ancestry. The June17 notice was read for initial vendor discovery but was not added to the March operation. The committee indices were used to locate amendments, not as independent corroboration of transaction amounts. The source packet&#x27;s original and amended March forms are versions of the same return. No full-cycle spend total, no complete source coverage and no private contract access is claimed.</p>",
        "path": "red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b/opposing-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "**Ready for independent review.** This pass follows one operation: Leading the Future (LTF) → Think Big → Lantern Production Consultants LLC → March 2026 opposition to Alexander Bores in the NY-12 federal primary. It establishes a named vendor and itemized services beyond the existing reported $5,000 creator offer. It does not establish ultimate subcontractors, an original donor's instruction, or the effect of the spending. Public records retrieved September 8, 2026. No messages, paid acquisition or publication.\n\n## What the money demonstrably reaches\n\nLTF's Q1 Schedule B, page 13, reports a **$5 million contribution to Think Big on February 24, 2026**, transaction `SB23.I31388`. This is a component of the retained `e147` $40 million contributions-to-other-committees aggregate. It is not a new external donation and is not a transfer to Build American AI. The source is the exact original already represented by `src-6460d3b558f5`; alias it instead of manufacturing corroboration. LTF original (see source references)\n\nThe controlling March return is Think Big's **May 20 amended April monthly report**, covering March 1–31. Its seven Bores-opposition Schedule E rows total **$787,404.29**. Each names Lantern as payee and checks opposition, House NY-12, primary 2026. The filed dissemination and disbursement-or-obligation dates are different fields; their order is preserved below. These are reported independent expenditures, not independently verified bank settlements or receipts from a creator. Amended return, pages 11–14 (see source references)\n\n| Transaction | PDF page | Filed purpose | USD | Dissemination | Disbursement or obligation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `SE.4218` | 11 | DIGITAL MEDIA PRODUCTION | 35,000.00 | 2026-03-01 | 2026-03-02 |\n| `SE.4219` | 11 | DIGITAL MEDIA PLACEMENT | 171,136.11 | 2026-03-01 | 2026-03-02 |\n| `SE.4220` | 12 | PRINT ADVERTISING | 111,136.11 | 2026-03-01 | 2026-03-02 |\n| `SE.4221` | 13 | TEXTING | 50,000.00 | 2026-03-12 | 2026-03-11 |\n| `SE.4222` | 13 | DIGITAL ADVERTISING / PRODUCTION | 256,691.67 | 2026-03-15 | 2026-03-16 |\n| `SE.4223` | 14 | PRINT ADVERTISING | 83,799.29 | 2026-03-14 | 2026-03-16 |\n| `SE.4224` | 14 | CABLE ADVERTISING / PRODUCTION | 79,641.11 | 2026-03-30 | 2026-03-27 |\n\nThe same Schedule E includes $277,827.78 for digital placement **supporting Jesse Jackson Jr** (`SE.4217`, p12). That is excluded from the Bores total. Together they reconcile to March independent expenditures of $1,065,232.07. These are the ordinary return's rows, not rapid notices added onto an ordinary return.\n\nSchedule B pages 7–9 separately report **$215,037 of operating disbursements to Lantern**: polling $121,500; research $13,500; management consulting $15,012; strategy consulting $20,025; political strategy consulting $25,000; media production $20,000. The candidate fields are blank; several rows carry an “Other 2025” election label despite March 2026 disbursement dates. The record does not allocate all this work to Bores. A separate $30,976 direct disbursement to Manhattan Strategies makes total operating spending $246,013; it does not establish that firm as Lantern's subcontractor. Operating plus independent expenditures reconcile to the return's $1,311,245.07 total disbursements. These partitions are not additional flows to add onto that total.\n\nFunding is also not an earmark. Think Big's 2025 year-end receipt pages disclose $500,000 from Ronald Conway on October 21 and $5 million from LTF on December 15. Its first reported Lantern expenditure on December 10 predates that December LTF receipt. Accordingly, even the record's short payment route cannot justify assigning every early ad to that particular transfer or to one LTF donor. This pass uses the February contribution followed by the March operation and makes no exact-dollar tracing claim. Year-end return, pp2,6–8 (see source references)\n\n## The amendment is consequential\n\nThe original April 20 return left the $13,500 Lantern purpose blank and used “political consulting” for a $25,000 item. The FEC's April 26 request asked for the missing purpose and a clearer description. The May 20 amendment supplies research and political strategy consulting respectively. The March expense amounts and selected Schedule E rows are unchanged. The public index shows this amendment; the original must not be presented as the current uncorrected disclosure. The request concerns those two reporting descriptions, not a Commission finding about vendor ownership or unlawful concealment. Original (see source references) FEC request (see source references) filing index (see source references)\n\n## What the operation was trying to do\n\nCity & State's January 26 report records Josh Vlasto, working with both LTF and Think Big, criticizing Bores' state AI approach and advocating national solutions. It also records the campaign's dispute over the ads' ICE/Palantir claims. This is an attributable account of the policy conflict, not evidence that those attack allegations were true. The original linked December YouTube page yielded only the title **Alex Bores is Wrong for AI & Wrong for Congress**. No video or transcript was reviewed and no particular March row was matched to that creative. No claim here establishes which March ad wording aired. City & State (see source references) linked original page, metadata only (see source references)\n\nThe strongest new result therefore concerns purchased electoral capacity and service types. It does not close the retained Build American AI → SM4 → creator-prospect offer-only route. Public First Action remains a different entity with a different funding instrument; no inference here moves Anthropic's restricted gift into election spending.\n\n## The holder frontier, with rival explanations\n\nThe May 5 CLC/Gonsalves-Brown complaint alleges that Think Big used Lantern to obscure ultimate providers. The inspected passage derives its expenditure case from FEC records; it is not an independent payment witness. Its ownership, exclusivity, lack of arm's-length dealing and unlawful-concealment conclusions remain **complainant allegations and inferences**, not findings adopted by this pass. Its all-period totals were not recomputed or integrated. Read pp7–11 and 15–18; the other case, exhibits and complete current enforcement docket were not reviewed. Complaint (see source references)\n\nA general contractor may coordinate media, polling and consultants under an ordinary commercial agreement. Alternatively, a vendor may be integrated with a campaign and function mainly as a payment intermediary. The contract, actual personnel overlap and subvendor instructions discriminate those explanations. The FEC's historical Advisory Opinion 1983-25 permitted less detailed reporting for the specific separately operated, arms-length media arrangement described there, with attention to other clients and independent principals. This does not decide Lantern's legal status; it explains why vendor concentration alone is insufficient. Official opinion, pp2–3 (see source references)\n\n**Stop here:** the specific next record is Think Big/Lantern's executed March agreement and invoice/placement bundle keyed to `SE.4218`–`SE.4224` (excluding `SE.4217`). It should identify the commissioned creative, media placement orders, actual producers and approval rights, with a subvendor ledger to reconcile net fees against pass-through costs. Think Big and Lantern are the identified holders; a publicly released station order tied to one transaction could reopen a smaller part of the route. No holder request was sent. A shell-company accusation, complete creator fee or policy-effect claim cannot replace those records.\n\n## Custody and integration\n\n`opposing-candidate.json` contains five proposed edges, four new nodes, one holder lead, source scopes, local capture hashes and the seven-row extraction. Candidate source `w3-opp-s-ltf-q1` aliases retained `src-6460d3b558f5`; contribution edge `w3-opp-e-ltf-thinkbig` is a subset of retained `e147`. Existing `ltf`, `buildai`, `sm4`, `pitchcreator` and `publicfirst` remain distinct and are not recreated. No existing Think Big, Lantern or Bores node was found by label/ID scan of r6.\n\nText and rendered-page files derive from the corresponding PDFs and are not extra independent sources. The complaint's cited FEC originals, its appendix-based claims, and summaries of that complaint share ancestry. The June17 notice was read for initial vendor discovery but was not added to the March operation. The committee indices were used to locate amendments, not as independent corroboration of transaction amounts. The source packet's original and amended March forms are versions of the same return. No full-cycle spend total, no complete source coverage and no private contract access is claimed.\n",
        "file": "research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08b-opposing-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters",
        "title": "Named adopters: Osprey at Discord and Bluesky",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source adoption inquiry closed after six discovery queries and four original HTML acquisitions. Read adopters-captures.json for custody and exact scopes. No new organization branch, harmful dataset, account, model inference, code execution, deployment inspection or case edit.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source adoption inquiry closed after six discovery queries and four original HTML acquisitions. Read <code>adopters-captures.json</code> for custody and exact scopes. No new organization branch, harmful dataset, account, model inference, code execution, deployment inspection or case edit.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>There are substantive, named <strong>reported production deployments</strong>, beyond partner logos. Discord provides its own dated technical account and describes a reciprocal development path. Bluesky&#x27;s account is a ROOST-published case study quoting participating staff and identifying the platform&#x27;s action machinery. Neither is an independent operational/outcome audit. Both locate important choices with the deploying platform rather than establishing a common policy imposed by the tool provider.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discord-shared-engine-retained-internal-rules\">Discord: shared engine, retained internal rules</h2>\n<p>Discord Engineering&#x27;s [19 February 2026 technical article](http[local research file] credited to Jared Miller and Ayu, reports that <strong>as of December 2025</strong>, Discord used open-source Osprey for approximately 400 million actions/day, across 204 action types and 2,288 rules, with 99 custom user-defined functions. These are operator-reported processing quantities, not counts of abusive users or successful takedowns.</p>\n<p>Its System Components section says Discord distributes rules through ETCD and routes outputs to configurable sinks. Handling Sensitive Data describes Discord&#x27;s own access controls, justification requirements and audit trails. Customizing Osprey for the Public expressly says Discord&#x27;s full rules, functions and sinks were not supplied; internal configurations were placed behind plugin integrations. This documents a configurable engine and retained local configuration. The shared source does not expose every internal detection rule or imply that ROOST receives Discord&#x27;s user data. Exact deployed commit, rule bundle and measured error rates remain unacquired. Source: <code>adopters-discord-engineering.html</code>; complete substantive body read, figures not inspected and examples not executed.</p>\n<p>Clint Smith&#x27;s [16 March 2026 account](http[local research file] says Osprey began as Discord&#x27;s production engine, was donated and improved through ROOST, and the community version was reintegrated into Discord production. His author biography identifies him as Discord&#x27;s chief legal officer; the article also identifies his ROOST board-chair role. This dual position matters to provenance: it is participant testimony from someone involved in both bodies. It supports a reported reciprocal resource flow, not independently proved performance. The article refers to the public v1 release but does not pin the exact Discord production revision. Its broad ecosystem user count and unrelated initiative references do not establish common policies, joined databases or additional named deployments. Source: <code>adopters-discord2026.html</code>, What Osprey Does and Results &amp; Impact.</p>\n<h2 id=\"bluesky-implementation-reaches-a-platform-owned-action-receiver\">Bluesky: implementation reaches a platform-owned action receiver</h2>\n<p>ROOST&#x27;s [4 February 2026 case study](http[local research file] by Andrew Chang, reports Osprey in Bluesky production, quoting its trust-and-safety engineering staff and department head by role. It reports over 45 million events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily. Those figures are attributed operating claims; actions are not necessarily unique accounts, bans or proven violations.</p>\n<p>The described path is <strong>atproto event stream → Osprey with Bluesky-specific functions → Kafka output sink → effects receiver on Bluesky servers → action in Ozone</strong>. The account says analysts migrated and developed rules; its named example labels suspected t-shirt spammers. This identifies the platform&#x27;s rule-writing and action integration, not ROOST approval of each decision. Setup still involved engineering, despite reduced dependence on engineers for subsequent rule changes.</p>\n<p>Its cost savings are estimates, and the publication date is not an exact go-live date. The case links v1.0 information without proving Bluesky&#x27;s deployed tag. This remains supplier-published participant evidence, not an independently observed endpoint. Source: <code>adopters-bluesky-case.html</code>, full substantive text read; diagrams and code images not visually verified.</p>\n<h2 id=\"earlier-state-and-support-conditions\">Earlier state and support conditions</h2>\n<p>The [21 July 2025 official release](http[local research file] described Bluesky as <strong>planning</strong> adoption, with a quotation from Aaron Rodericks, then named as its trust-and-safety head. It also described public availability as forthcoming and Osprey as a Discord donation. The later accounts support progression from intention to reported production; July alone does not.</p>\n<p>That release credits philanthropic funding and pro bono Perkins Coie legal services with the acquisition of Cove technology and tool launch. It does not allocate those resources to Bluesky or establish a recipient support contract. No paid support terms, service-level guarantees, adoption grant, update obligation or agreement requiring a particular policy was acquired for either selected platform. The public accounts describe collaboration and community assistance; contractual rights remain a separate question. Source: <code>adopters-launch2025.html</code>, Bringing Professional Tools, Early Adopters and What&#x27;s Next.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-enters-the-map\">What enters the map</h2>\n<p>The supportable paths are Discord&#x27;s <strong>reported production use / contribution / reintegration</strong>, and a <strong>ROOST-published account of Bluesky production use</strong>, with <strong>platform-configured rules and a local action integration</strong>. Where the case already holds the organizations and Osprey, reuse them. Do not create an enforcement-authority edge from a logo, model-provider affiliation or working-group attendance.</p>\n<p>No acquired adopter account establishes use of the CCF TVEC prompt pack, mandatory ROOST policy, a Canadian-funded deployment, Lantern signal access or a specific law-enforcement referral. Osprey adoption is not evidence of adopting every ROOST-supported model or sample policy. The most useful next record would pair a named deployment&#x27;s exact configuration/policy revision with its approval process and a documented action or correction. That question remains for the next forest assessment; this lane has not pursued it.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-and-finite-frontier\">Source custody and finite frontier</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Original</th>\n<th>SHA256</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Discord technical account</td>\n<td><code>0f2a56a451732d6b4757001b422adbc4fa9bc20d4377af27b78cedbd1420507b</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Discord reciprocal-use account</td>\n<td><code>56344330354ef4d4cdbd720aef5824e93e9f06a02b2efdbd5bcc81650a7a7d64</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ROOST Bluesky case study</td>\n<td><code>973be08b940baafe8e865583f9ed2cd716e0fb4839d7bc61f505c4372fec1bd6</code></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>July 2025 launch release</td>\n<td><code>203ad1a26a54aaedca7dc58e30f0d0af0ac7ebd4ed3156e2093cfdd67a2f70bf</code></td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>All four ordinary unauthenticated GETs returned substantive 200 HTML and were hash-checked. Full substantive article bodies were read. Related articles, linked models, external vendor offerings and screenshots were not treated as inspected sources. Raw HTML and derivative text remain separate; Discord&#x27;s scoped rich-text body extracts aid reproduction of the read.</p>\n<p>The six queries covered Bluesky&#x27;s own site/docs, Discord&#x27;s Osprey/ROOST accounts, Matrix&#x27;s Osprey mention, and the named Bluesky case study. Matrix annual-report search excerpts described prospective 2026 use; they were not expanded into a third case or used to contradict a later current-use claim. No Bluesky-owned deployment report surfaced in these scoped queries; that is a retrieval limitation, not proof none exists. Public social reposts and irrelevant similarly named results were not treated as independent corroboration. No failed routes were retried. Acquisition stops here.</p>",
        "path": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09/adopters.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-discord-engineering",
          "w27-roost-s-discord-roost2026",
          "w27-roost-s-bluesky-case",
          "w27-roost-s-osprey-launch2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded primary-source adoption inquiry closed after six discovery queries and four original HTML acquisitions. Read `adopters-captures.json` for custody and exact scopes. No new organization branch, harmful dataset, account, model inference, code execution, deployment inspection or case edit.\n\n## Finding\n\nThere are substantive, named **reported production deployments**, beyond partner logos. Discord provides its own dated technical account and describes a reciprocal development path. Bluesky's account is a ROOST-published case study quoting participating staff and identifying the platform's action machinery. Neither is an independent operational/outcome audit. Both locate important choices with the deploying platform rather than establishing a common policy imposed by the tool provider.\n\n## Discord: shared engine, retained internal rules\n\nDiscord Engineering's 19 February 2026 technical article (see source references) credited to Jared Miller and Ayu, reports that **as of December 2025**, Discord used open-source Osprey for approximately 400 million actions/day, across 204 action types and 2,288 rules, with 99 custom user-defined functions. These are operator-reported processing quantities, not counts of abusive users or successful takedowns.\n\nIts System Components section says Discord distributes rules through ETCD and routes outputs to configurable sinks. Handling Sensitive Data describes Discord's own access controls, justification requirements and audit trails. Customizing Osprey for the Public expressly says Discord's full rules, functions and sinks were not supplied; internal configurations were placed behind plugin integrations. This documents a configurable engine and retained local configuration. The shared source does not expose every internal detection rule or imply that ROOST receives Discord's user data. Exact deployed commit, rule bundle and measured error rates remain unacquired. Source: `adopters-discord-engineering.html`; complete substantive body read, figures not inspected and examples not executed.\n\nClint Smith's 16 March 2026 account (see source references) says Osprey began as Discord's production engine, was donated and improved through ROOST, and the community version was reintegrated into Discord production. His author biography identifies him as Discord's chief legal officer; the article also identifies his ROOST board-chair role. This dual position matters to provenance: it is participant testimony from someone involved in both bodies. It supports a reported reciprocal resource flow, not independently proved performance. The article refers to the public v1 release but does not pin the exact Discord production revision. Its broad ecosystem user count and unrelated initiative references do not establish common policies, joined databases or additional named deployments. Source: `adopters-discord2026.html`, What Osprey Does and Results & Impact.\n\n## Bluesky: implementation reaches a platform-owned action receiver\n\nROOST's 4 February 2026 case study (see source references) by Andrew Chang, reports Osprey in Bluesky production, quoting its trust-and-safety engineering staff and department head by role. It reports over 45 million events and 100,000 enforcement actions daily. Those figures are attributed operating claims; actions are not necessarily unique accounts, bans or proven violations.\n\nThe described path is **atproto event stream → Osprey with Bluesky-specific functions → Kafka output sink → effects receiver on Bluesky servers → action in Ozone**. The account says analysts migrated and developed rules; its named example labels suspected t-shirt spammers. This identifies the platform's rule-writing and action integration, not ROOST approval of each decision. Setup still involved engineering, despite reduced dependence on engineers for subsequent rule changes.\n\nIts cost savings are estimates, and the publication date is not an exact go-live date. The case links v1.0 information without proving Bluesky's deployed tag. This remains supplier-published participant evidence, not an independently observed endpoint. Source: `adopters-bluesky-case.html`, full substantive text read; diagrams and code images not visually verified.\n\n## Earlier state and support conditions\n\nThe 21 July 2025 official release (see source references) described Bluesky as **planning** adoption, with a quotation from Aaron Rodericks, then named as its trust-and-safety head. It also described public availability as forthcoming and Osprey as a Discord donation. The later accounts support progression from intention to reported production; July alone does not.\n\nThat release credits philanthropic funding and pro bono Perkins Coie legal services with the acquisition of Cove technology and tool launch. It does not allocate those resources to Bluesky or establish a recipient support contract. No paid support terms, service-level guarantees, adoption grant, update obligation or agreement requiring a particular policy was acquired for either selected platform. The public accounts describe collaboration and community assistance; contractual rights remain a separate question. Source: `adopters-launch2025.html`, Bringing Professional Tools, Early Adopters and What's Next.\n\n## What enters the map\n\nThe supportable paths are Discord's **reported production use / contribution / reintegration**, and a **ROOST-published account of Bluesky production use**, with **platform-configured rules and a local action integration**. Where the case already holds the organizations and Osprey, reuse them. Do not create an enforcement-authority edge from a logo, model-provider affiliation or working-group attendance.\n\nNo acquired adopter account establishes use of the CCF TVEC prompt pack, mandatory ROOST policy, a Canadian-funded deployment, Lantern signal access or a specific law-enforcement referral. Osprey adoption is not evidence of adopting every ROOST-supported model or sample policy. The most useful next record would pair a named deployment's exact configuration/policy revision with its approval process and a documented action or correction. That question remains for the next forest assessment; this lane has not pursued it.\n\n## Source custody and finite frontier\n\n| Original | SHA256 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Discord technical account | `0f2a56a451732d6b4757001b422adbc4fa9bc20d4377af27b78cedbd1420507b` |\n| Discord reciprocal-use account | `56344330354ef4d4cdbd720aef5824e93e9f06a02b2efdbd5bcc81650a7a7d64` |\n| ROOST Bluesky case study | `973be08b940baafe8e865583f9ed2cd716e0fb4839d7bc61f505c4372fec1bd6` |\n| July 2025 launch release | `203ad1a26a54aaedca7dc58e30f0d0af0ac7ebd4ed3156e2093cfdd67a2f70bf` |\n\nAll four ordinary unauthenticated GETs returned substantive 200 HTML and were hash-checked. Full substantive article bodies were read. Related articles, linked models, external vendor offerings and screenshots were not treated as inspected sources. Raw HTML and derivative text remain separate; Discord's scoped rich-text body extracts aid reproduction of the read.\n\nThe six queries covered Bluesky's own site/docs, Discord's Osprey/ROOST accounts, Matrix's Osprey mention, and the named Bluesky case study. Matrix annual-report search excerpts described prospective 2026 use; they were not expanded into a third case or used to contradict a later current-use claim. No Bluesky-owned deployment report surfaced in these scoped queries; that is a retrieval limitation, not proof none exists. Public social reposts and irrelevant similarly named results were not treated as independent corroboration. No failed routes were retried. Acquisition stops here.\n",
        "file": "research/roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-adopters.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation",
        "title": "From model guidance to local rules: the Phoebe boundary",
        "description": "9 September2026. Bounded acquisition closed after one RMC guide and its single named Phoebe implementation. The public record establishes instructional architecture and static mechanisms for drafting rules. It does not establish a named deployment using CCF's policy, a production moderation decision, or a Canadian-funded delivery. No software installation, m",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Bounded acquisition closed after one RMC guide and its single named Phoebe implementation. The public record establishes instructional architecture and static mechanisms for drafting rules. It does not establish a named deployment using CCF&#x27;s policy, a production moderation decision, or a Canadian-funded delivery. No software installation, model inference, endpoint call, harmful-content dataset, account or submission occurred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-rmc-guide-actually-recommends\">What the RMC guide actually recommends</h2>\n<p>The [Using Open Safety Models guide](http[local research file] separates detection, investigation, review and enforcement. It describes models classifying against an existing policy, supporting investigation/review and improving policies. Its suggested two-model arrangement routes uncertain cases to a stronger model that recommends an action for human review; review data should then inform policy revision. This is a recommended design, not a compulsory architecture or measured deployment. Locators: retained <code>implementation-rmc-guide.md</code> lines7–39.</p>\n<p>The guide places model, hosting and policy choices with the adopting team. It advises choosing by performance, latency, cost and licence, testing against a suitable dataset, choosing relevant metrics, and distinguishing model errors from inconsistent policy. It allows open/closed hybrids. Its policy section says ROOST does not write policies and points to outside-contributed examples. That institutional description is consistent with hosting a CCF contribution; it does not prove that every ROOST tool uses that contribution. Locators: lines45–95. This source is pinned to Model Community revision <code>22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6</code>; the retained earlier README supplies the exact guide link. No exact guide-publication date is inferred from the repository revision.</p>\n<h2 id=\"one-linked-implementation-inspected-rather-than-presumed-deployed\">One linked implementation, inspected rather than presumed deployed</h2>\n<p>The guide&#x27;s investigation example links [Phoebe](http[local research file] describing an agent that analyzes threats and suggests Osprey rules. I followed this one implementation only. Public HEAD returned <code>dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062</code>, committer date7February2026. All findings below concern that pinned source, not every current or privately modified Phoebe deployment.</p>\n<p>The [README](http[local research file] lines3–20, describes Osprey rule writing, analytics and Ozone moderation. It claims writing, validation and deployment in its feature summary but expressly marks moderation as unimplemented. Its sample model configuration is Claude Sonnet4.5 via Anthropic, with alternate API backends configurable. It is therefore not evidence of gpt-oss-safeguard, the CCF pack or any particular open model operating on Bluesky. Mentioning the ATProtocol network in the README and prompt is not an adopter account.</p>\n<p>The concrete code draws a narrower boundary than the feature summary. [Osprey.save_rule](http[local research file] writes an <code>.sml</code> file under the local <code>./data/ruleset</code> tree after checking its path/extension. If creating a non-index file and a parent index already exists, it appends a Require entry, optionally conditioned by the supplied <code>require_if</code>. It can overwrite an existing local rule. This creates or changes a candidate rule and its local inclusion, not a recorded remote deployment. Lines165–208.</p>\n<p>[validate_rules](http[local research file] runs <code>osprey-cli push-rules ../ruleset --dry-run</code>; the code expressly says the flag validates without pushing. The tool wrapper returns success/error from that validator. Validation thus cannot be represented as production activation or content-policy accuracy testing. No remote push/commit, reviewer approval or active-engine acknowledgement is established by these functions. An external deployment arrangement could supply a later step, but none was inspected. Osprey source lines210–233 and tool definitions lines136–149.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-can-change-what\">Who can change what</h2>\n<p>The operator configures the model/API, Osprey endpoint and source/ruleset repositories through settings; the inspected defaults include a particular author&#x27;s ATProtocol ruleset repository, while README examples use an operator&#x27;s repository. I did not acquire or inspect that separate ruleset. The Osprey adapter requests labels, features, known actions and UDF documentation from the configured service. These determine the available vocabulary/effects that the agent sees. No universal CCF taxonomy or hardwired CCF pack is established. [Config](http[local research file] lines26–57; Osprey adapter lines59–73; tool definitions lines1–59.</p>\n<p>The [source prompt](http[local research file] directs the model to understand target behavior, use available effects, write rules and validate them. It includes examples of account labels and reports for moderation review, and a requirement to validate every new rule. Those are source instructions/examples, not proof an effect ran. The save function itself neither validates nor awaits a human approval; validation is a separate tool plus a prompt instruction. This is a scoped observation about these functions, not an audit of every possible deployment&#x27;s permission system. Prompt lines31–38,172–209; tool definitions lines103–149.</p>\n<p>The MIT licence permits modification and redistribution subject to retaining its notices and disclaimer. It provides software freedom, not access to an Osprey installation, a platform&#x27;s content or separately licensed models. The source files can consequently be changed by a downstream operator, while the actual chosen version/configuration remains an evidentiary question. Entire21-line LICENSE read. No named actor&#x27;s production permission or exercise of a right is inferred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"action-and-correction-are-not-finished-interfaces-here\">Action and correction are not finished interfaces here</h2>\n<p>Both direct Ozone methods, [apply_label and remove_label](http[local research file] raise <code>NotImplementedError</code>; the client constructor is also a TODO. The README explicitly marks these as unfinished. Prospective allowed-label/moderator settings and comments in config do not establish enforcement of that permission scheme. The absence of a working direct removal method is not proof that all Osprey deployments lack reversal; they are distinct mechanisms.</p>\n<p>The initialization routine clones configured repositories only if their local directories are absent, otherwise logs that they already exist and does not fetch them in that routine. This does not establish any comprehensive update policy. No mandatory corrected-policy notification, recipient synchronization acknowledgement, review reopening or restored-item trace was acquired. Local rule updates and the guide&#x27;s recommendation to iterate policies are weaker claims than those actual duties/outcomes. Osprey initialization lines32–57 and source-fetch methods75–115.</p>\n<p>The relevant chain stops here: operator-selected context and instructions → model-generated candidate rule → local write/inclusion → separate dry-run validation. Activation in the live rules engine, the runtime effect handler, any moderation decision and any later correction require their own records. The generic README term deploy cannot supply the missing steps.</p>\n<h2 id=\"forest-implication-and-next-discriminator\">Forest implication and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>This implementation narrows the adoption claim rather than closing it. ROOST&#x27;s guide promotes an example that can turn analysis into editable local rules. The selected example&#x27;s own source exposes unfinished direct moderation and a non-pushing validator. It supports a route for assistance and transferable rules, not a proved uniform restriction system or a government-enforced CCF policy.</p>\n<p>The useful next record is a named operator&#x27;s exact model/prompt/ruleset revision plus the approved activation mechanism and effect-handler configuration, joined to one action and reconsideration outcome. A later Phoebe release or a separate deploying system might resolve the missing step; this pass did not follow either. Root&#x27;s Pathways and adopter accounts remain independent evidence lanes. No automatic Phoebe/Osprey/Coop→CCF/Elevate/contribution26007 relation is warranted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-limits\">Custody and limits</h2>\n<p><code>implementation-captures.json</code> records10 successful original/API responses plus one reader-failure observation. Original bytes and hashes are retained. Complete reads: guide105lines; Phoebe README133; prompt254; Osprey adapter233; Ozone adapter18; Osprey tool definitions149; config60; MIT licence21. Commit metadata supplies the source pin; repository-tree metadata was used only to choose these files. The remainder of the repository, agent loop, executor/sandbox and external runtime effect handlers were not audited. README claims about sandbox security/performance were not independently tested or adopted as findings.</p>\n<p>The pinned guide web reader failed with a cache miss; one ordinary GET succeeded. Subsequent sources used normal public GET. No installation or repository execution was performed, and installation commands in the source remained unevaluated text. No additional implementation link, dataset, model weights or CCF policy test was opened. The prior case, current-work, atlas and ZIP were not changed.</p>",
        "path": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09/implementation.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-guide",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-pin",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-readme",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-prompt",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-osprey",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-ozone",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-tools",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-config",
          "w27-roost-s-phoebe-mit"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Bounded acquisition closed after one RMC guide and its single named Phoebe implementation. The public record establishes instructional architecture and static mechanisms for drafting rules. It does not establish a named deployment using CCF's policy, a production moderation decision, or a Canadian-funded delivery. No software installation, model inference, endpoint call, harmful-content dataset, account or submission occurred.\n\n## What the RMC guide actually recommends\n\nThe Using Open Safety Models guide (see source references) separates detection, investigation, review and enforcement. It describes models classifying against an existing policy, supporting investigation/review and improving policies. Its suggested two-model arrangement routes uncertain cases to a stronger model that recommends an action for human review; review data should then inform policy revision. This is a recommended design, not a compulsory architecture or measured deployment. Locators: retained `implementation-rmc-guide.md` lines7–39.\n\nThe guide places model, hosting and policy choices with the adopting team. It advises choosing by performance, latency, cost and licence, testing against a suitable dataset, choosing relevant metrics, and distinguishing model errors from inconsistent policy. It allows open/closed hybrids. Its policy section says ROOST does not write policies and points to outside-contributed examples. That institutional description is consistent with hosting a CCF contribution; it does not prove that every ROOST tool uses that contribution. Locators: lines45–95. This source is pinned to Model Community revision `22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6`; the retained earlier README supplies the exact guide link. No exact guide-publication date is inferred from the repository revision.\n\n## One linked implementation, inspected rather than presumed deployed\n\nThe guide's investigation example links Phoebe (see source references) describing an agent that analyzes threats and suggests Osprey rules. I followed this one implementation only. Public HEAD returned `dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062`, committer date7February2026. All findings below concern that pinned source, not every current or privately modified Phoebe deployment.\n\nThe README (see source references) lines3–20, describes Osprey rule writing, analytics and Ozone moderation. It claims writing, validation and deployment in its feature summary but expressly marks moderation as unimplemented. Its sample model configuration is Claude Sonnet4.5 via Anthropic, with alternate API backends configurable. It is therefore not evidence of gpt-oss-safeguard, the CCF pack or any particular open model operating on Bluesky. Mentioning the ATProtocol network in the README and prompt is not an adopter account.\n\nThe concrete code draws a narrower boundary than the feature summary. Osprey.save_rule (see source references) writes an `.sml` file under the local `./data/ruleset` tree after checking its path/extension. If creating a non-index file and a parent index already exists, it appends a Require entry, optionally conditioned by the supplied `require_if`. It can overwrite an existing local rule. This creates or changes a candidate rule and its local inclusion, not a recorded remote deployment. Lines165–208.\n\nvalidate_rules (see source references) runs `osprey-cli push-rules ../ruleset --dry-run`; the code expressly says the flag validates without pushing. The tool wrapper returns success/error from that validator. Validation thus cannot be represented as production activation or content-policy accuracy testing. No remote push/commit, reviewer approval or active-engine acknowledgement is established by these functions. An external deployment arrangement could supply a later step, but none was inspected. Osprey source lines210–233 and tool definitions lines136–149.\n\n## Who can change what\n\nThe operator configures the model/API, Osprey endpoint and source/ruleset repositories through settings; the inspected defaults include a particular author's ATProtocol ruleset repository, while README examples use an operator's repository. I did not acquire or inspect that separate ruleset. The Osprey adapter requests labels, features, known actions and UDF documentation from the configured service. These determine the available vocabulary/effects that the agent sees. No universal CCF taxonomy or hardwired CCF pack is established. Config (see source references) lines26–57; Osprey adapter lines59–73; tool definitions lines1–59.\n\nThe source prompt (see source references) directs the model to understand target behavior, use available effects, write rules and validate them. It includes examples of account labels and reports for moderation review, and a requirement to validate every new rule. Those are source instructions/examples, not proof an effect ran. The save function itself neither validates nor awaits a human approval; validation is a separate tool plus a prompt instruction. This is a scoped observation about these functions, not an audit of every possible deployment's permission system. Prompt lines31–38,172–209; tool definitions lines103–149.\n\nThe MIT licence permits modification and redistribution subject to retaining its notices and disclaimer. It provides software freedom, not access to an Osprey installation, a platform's content or separately licensed models. The source files can consequently be changed by a downstream operator, while the actual chosen version/configuration remains an evidentiary question. Entire21-line LICENSE read. No named actor's production permission or exercise of a right is inferred.\n\n## Action and correction are not finished interfaces here\n\nBoth direct Ozone methods, apply_label and remove_label (see source references) raise `NotImplementedError`; the client constructor is also a TODO. The README explicitly marks these as unfinished. Prospective allowed-label/moderator settings and comments in config do not establish enforcement of that permission scheme. The absence of a working direct removal method is not proof that all Osprey deployments lack reversal; they are distinct mechanisms.\n\nThe initialization routine clones configured repositories only if their local directories are absent, otherwise logs that they already exist and does not fetch them in that routine. This does not establish any comprehensive update policy. No mandatory corrected-policy notification, recipient synchronization acknowledgement, review reopening or restored-item trace was acquired. Local rule updates and the guide's recommendation to iterate policies are weaker claims than those actual duties/outcomes. Osprey initialization lines32–57 and source-fetch methods75–115.\n\nThe relevant chain stops here: operator-selected context and instructions → model-generated candidate rule → local write/inclusion → separate dry-run validation. Activation in the live rules engine, the runtime effect handler, any moderation decision and any later correction require their own records. The generic README term deploy cannot supply the missing steps.\n\n## Forest implication and next discriminator\n\nThis implementation narrows the adoption claim rather than closing it. ROOST's guide promotes an example that can turn analysis into editable local rules. The selected example's own source exposes unfinished direct moderation and a non-pushing validator. It supports a route for assistance and transferable rules, not a proved uniform restriction system or a government-enforced CCF policy.\n\nThe useful next record is a named operator's exact model/prompt/ruleset revision plus the approved activation mechanism and effect-handler configuration, joined to one action and reconsideration outcome. A later Phoebe release or a separate deploying system might resolve the missing step; this pass did not follow either. Root's Pathways and adopter accounts remain independent evidence lanes. No automatic Phoebe/Osprey/Coop→CCF/Elevate/contribution26007 relation is warranted.\n\n## Custody and limits\n\n`implementation-captures.json` records10 successful original/API responses plus one reader-failure observation. Original bytes and hashes are retained. Complete reads: guide105lines; Phoebe README133; prompt254; Osprey adapter233; Ozone adapter18; Osprey tool definitions149; config60; MIT licence21. Commit metadata supplies the source pin; repository-tree metadata was used only to choose these files. The remainder of the repository, agent loop, executor/sandbox and external runtime effect handlers were not audited. README claims about sandbox security/performance were not independently tested or adopted as findings.\n\nThe pinned guide web reader failed with a cache miss; one ordinary GET succeeded. Subsequent sources used normal public GET. No installation or repository execution was performed, and installation commands in the source remained unevaluated text. No additional implementation link, dataset, model weights or CCF policy test was opened. The prior case, current-work, atlas and ZIP were not changed.\n",
        "file": "research/roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-implementation.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support",
        "title": "Pathways: access conditions, advice and a separate consulting service",
        "description": "9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. This is the Tech Coalition capacity/support lane of the ROOST adoption run. It establishes a concrete support programme and published obligations, not a named ROOST deployment or a compulsory classification standard.",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. This is the Tech Coalition capacity/support lane of the ROOST adoption run. It establishes a concrete support programme and published obligations, not a named ROOST deployment or a compulsory classification standard.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-connection-and-chronology\">The connection and chronology</h2>\n<p>ROOST&#x27;s previously retained10February2025 launch letter credits Tech Coalition expertise and quotes Sean Litton supporting wider tool adoption through capacity building. This is collaboration, not proof Pathways supplied ROOST code or licensed a particular model. Source and full reading scope remain in ../roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09/governance-funding.md and governance-gratitude2025.html.</p>\n<p>The Coalition&#x27;s [18July2024 launch](http[local research file] described policy-writing and reporting guidance, technology-licensing opportunities and prospective membership development. Giphy/Rec Room testimonials endorse the programme; they do not demonstrate tool installation. Current eligibility wording should not be silently backdated to this announcement.</p>\n<p>The [18December2025 year review](http[local research file] reports67 participating companies that year, five new resources, two fireside chats and an initial Elevate pilot preparing firms for possible membership. These are the operator&#x27;s activity counts, not independently verified outcomes or a ROOST user count. Root read the complete substantive body; other programme numbers are not new findings here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-access-and-obligation\">Current access and obligation</h2>\n<p>The [current Pathways page](http[local research file] offers no-cost guidance and peer support to eligible company employees handling user content/communications. It excludes current member-company staff and vendors without that function; applicants are reviewed. Membership is neither required nor guaranteed. PhotoDNA is an opportunity to apply for a free sublicense through the Coalition, not automatic access, hash-database entitlement or installation. Topics include policy drafting, reporting and generative-AI safeguards. The intake explicitly requires agreement to terms including confidentiality. No intake was submitted, restricted resource hub entered or license application made. Publication/revision date is unverified; this is the9September2026 page.</p>\n<p>The [published non-member terms](http[local research file] clauses1–9, make continued use acceptance of discretionary updates, require accurate registration and reasonable efforts to answer information requests within three months, and grant a revocable, nontransferable site licence. They restrict copying to specified internal uses. Mentoring information carries confidentiality obligations and limited internal sharing. Crucially, clause7 leaves whether/how to use the materials to the user&#x27;s discretion, calls use voluntary and disclaims a legal/community standard. This demonstrates access/IP/confidentiality conditions alongside retained implementation choice, not an exercised direction to remove content. No executed participant agreement or enforcement event was acquired. Root read all nine clauses through the primary reader; no legal enforceability opinion is offered.</p>\n<h2 id=\"paid-depth-of-support-separate-identity\">Paid depth of support, separate identity</h2>\n<p>The [Tech Coalition Elevate page](http[local research file] offers tailored consulting, risk/maturity assessment, implementation support and mentorship to members, Pathways participants or other companies. Membership is unnecessary. Pricing depends on scope/expertise/support and is set in a tailored proposal; there is no published fixed fee or acquired payment. It can complement free Pathways or membership services. The actual proposal/deliverables/approval rights remain unknown. Its form links a different /terms/ page, which was not acquired: Pathways&#x27;s detailed clauses must not be treated as the consulting contract.</p>\n<p><strong>This is not Christchurch Call Foundation&#x27;s Elevate.</strong> Different hosts and stated programmes establish distinct identities despite the shared name. The Canadian CCF contribution must not finance the Coalition&#x27;s consulting service by name matching.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-named-participant-and-a-real-date-discrepancy\">A named participant and a real date discrepancy</h2>\n<p>[Stability AI&#x27;s announcement](http[local research file] published11February2026 according to retained page metadata, reports Pathways participation in2025 and subsequent Coalition membership. It names guidance/peer learning, not ROOST adoption or Lantern access. Full substantive announcement read; latest modification metadata is2March2026.</p>\n<p>An earlier [company email published by the Brennan Center](http[local research file] PDF64–66, is attributed to Ana Guillen and dated21January2025. Page65 instead says Pathways was joined in July2024. The date accounts conflict; exact enrolment is unresolved. This is an attributed company response in a third-party compilation, not independent corroboration of safety performance. Root read those three pages, not all72 or linked safeguards. The other initiatives on those pages were not followed into new branches.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-changes-and-what-it-leaves-open\">What this changes and what it leaves open</h2>\n<p>Advice can travel through a selective, confidential support relationship and lead into deeper consulting or membership without transferring final platform decision rights. That structure is more specific than calling all cooperation open or all support coercive. Here it provides an adoption pathway and conditions on resources; no named ROOST configuration, content order, donor veto or actual PhotoDNA sublicense follows. A worked recipient support agreement and its implementation record would distinguish normative influence from exercised authority.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-frontier\">Custody and frontier</h2>\n<p>pathways-captures.json holds seven successful public originals: six HTML pages and one72-page PDF, with exact URLs, UTC capture times and byte hashes. Root read the substantive HTML bodies as scoped there, all nine Pathways clauses and PDF64–66. Derived plain text is labelled separately. The initial fitz import was unavailable; one pypdf substitute succeeded. The Elevate primary reader errored; one ordinary GET succeeded. Closed CCF/GitHub/registry routes were not retried. Four initial discovery queries and one focused eligibility query identified the records; unrelated search results were not evidence. No forms, accounts, outreach, model inference or payment occurred. Acquisition stopped for the combined forest.</p>",
        "path": "roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09/pathways-support.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-current",
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-terms",
          "w27-roost-s-tc-elevate",
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-launch2024",
          "w27-roost-s-pathways-year2025",
          "w27-roost-s-stability-pathways2026",
          "w27-roost-s-stability-earlier-email"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Root acquisition closed. This is the Tech Coalition capacity/support lane of the ROOST adoption run. It establishes a concrete support programme and published obligations, not a named ROOST deployment or a compulsory classification standard.\n\n## The connection and chronology\n\nROOST's previously retained10February2025 launch letter credits Tech Coalition expertise and quotes Sean Litton supporting wider tool adoption through capacity building. This is collaboration, not proof Pathways supplied ROOST code or licensed a particular model. Source and full reading scope remain in ../roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09/governance-funding.md and governance-gratitude2025.html.\n\nThe Coalition's 18July2024 launch (see source references) described policy-writing and reporting guidance, technology-licensing opportunities and prospective membership development. Giphy/Rec Room testimonials endorse the programme; they do not demonstrate tool installation. Current eligibility wording should not be silently backdated to this announcement.\n\nThe 18December2025 year review (see source references) reports67 participating companies that year, five new resources, two fireside chats and an initial Elevate pilot preparing firms for possible membership. These are the operator's activity counts, not independently verified outcomes or a ROOST user count. Root read the complete substantive body; other programme numbers are not new findings here.\n\n## Current access and obligation\n\nThe current Pathways page (see source references) offers no-cost guidance and peer support to eligible company employees handling user content/communications. It excludes current member-company staff and vendors without that function; applicants are reviewed. Membership is neither required nor guaranteed. PhotoDNA is an opportunity to apply for a free sublicense through the Coalition, not automatic access, hash-database entitlement or installation. Topics include policy drafting, reporting and generative-AI safeguards. The intake explicitly requires agreement to terms including confidentiality. No intake was submitted, restricted resource hub entered or license application made. Publication/revision date is unverified; this is the9September2026 page.\n\nThe published non-member terms (see source references) clauses1–9, make continued use acceptance of discretionary updates, require accurate registration and reasonable efforts to answer information requests within three months, and grant a revocable, nontransferable site licence. They restrict copying to specified internal uses. Mentoring information carries confidentiality obligations and limited internal sharing. Crucially, clause7 leaves whether/how to use the materials to the user's discretion, calls use voluntary and disclaims a legal/community standard. This demonstrates access/IP/confidentiality conditions alongside retained implementation choice, not an exercised direction to remove content. No executed participant agreement or enforcement event was acquired. Root read all nine clauses through the primary reader; no legal enforceability opinion is offered.\n\n## Paid depth of support, separate identity\n\nThe Tech Coalition Elevate page (see source references) offers tailored consulting, risk/maturity assessment, implementation support and mentorship to members, Pathways participants or other companies. Membership is unnecessary. Pricing depends on scope/expertise/support and is set in a tailored proposal; there is no published fixed fee or acquired payment. It can complement free Pathways or membership services. The actual proposal/deliverables/approval rights remain unknown. Its form links a different /terms/ page, which was not acquired: Pathways's detailed clauses must not be treated as the consulting contract.\n\n**This is not Christchurch Call Foundation's Elevate.** Different hosts and stated programmes establish distinct identities despite the shared name. The Canadian CCF contribution must not finance the Coalition's consulting service by name matching.\n\n## A named participant and a real date discrepancy\n\nStability AI's announcement (see source references) published11February2026 according to retained page metadata, reports Pathways participation in2025 and subsequent Coalition membership. It names guidance/peer learning, not ROOST adoption or Lantern access. Full substantive announcement read; latest modification metadata is2March2026.\n\nAn earlier company email published by the Brennan Center (see source references) PDF64–66, is attributed to Ana Guillen and dated21January2025. Page65 instead says Pathways was joined in July2024. The date accounts conflict; exact enrolment is unresolved. This is an attributed company response in a third-party compilation, not independent corroboration of safety performance. Root read those three pages, not all72 or linked safeguards. The other initiatives on those pages were not followed into new branches.\n\n## What this changes and what it leaves open\n\nAdvice can travel through a selective, confidential support relationship and lead into deeper consulting or membership without transferring final platform decision rights. That structure is more specific than calling all cooperation open or all support coercive. Here it provides an adoption pathway and conditions on resources; no named ROOST configuration, content order, donor veto or actual PhotoDNA sublicense follows. A worked recipient support agreement and its implementation record would distinguish normative influence from exercised authority.\n\n## Custody and frontier\n\npathways-captures.json holds seven successful public originals: six HTML pages and one72-page PDF, with exact URLs, UTC capture times and byte hashes. Root read the substantive HTML bodies as scoped there, all nine Pathways clauses and PDF64–66. Derived plain text is labelled separately. The initial fitz import was unavailable; one pypdf substitute succeeded. The Elevate primary reader errored; one ordinary GET succeeded. Closed CCF/GitHub/registry routes were not retried. Four initial discovery queries and one focused eligibility query identified the records; unrelated search results were not evidence. No forms, accounts, outreach, model inference or payment occurred. Acquisition stopped for the combined forest.\n",
        "file": "research/roost-adoption-wave-2026-09-09-pathways-support.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme",
        "title": "CCF programme and delivery lane — Elevate",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition closed for this lane; ROOST governance and tools lanes continue. This is the recipient-side programme crosswalk, not a finding of completed software delivery.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root acquisition closed for this lane; ROOST governance and tools lanes continue. This is the recipient-side programme crosswalk, not a finding of completed software delivery.</p>\n<p>[CCF Canadian-investment announcement](http[local research file] full substantive body/Notes read through primary reader, lines14–43. It names Elevate, the Community Resilience Fund support and ROOST collaboration, with an attributed statement by ROOST president Camille Francois. Its rounded amount matches the separately retained Canadian contribution26007; it is not a second award. It describes a three-year programme spanning interventions, open-source tools, benchmarks and capacity. Earlier leader priorities in2022/23 are described, so this announcement alone cannot show the2025 donor originated the policy. The claimed Canadian role in shaping international technology governance is the recipient&#x27;s characterization, not a specified contractual right. No payment receipt, subcontract amount, acceptance record or named deployed product appears. Original GET403 retained as error; no retry.</p>\n<p>[Charting a Collective Response](http[local research file] full substantive indexed-primary text read, direct reader404 and GET403 closed. It describes initial needs assessment/experimentation, later continuing tool development and parallel support for smaller platforms with ROOST. This is programme sequencing and intent, not an implementation report.</p>\n<p>[Current Elevate programme page](http[local research file] indexed substantive body read, undated snapshot. It ties the programme to Canada&#x27;s CRF, ROOST and the community, and describes work on AI standards/benchmarks and a toolkit for smaller providers. The page advertises a GitHub link, but the available index supplies no target and its GET403/reader-cache-miss routes are closed. No repository identity or deployed software crosswalk is established by that link label. The history-page indexed Elevate entry says12November2025 launch; other historical claims there were not acquired for use.</p>\n<p>[ROOST-hosted CCF partnership announcement](http[local research file] original retained and full main body/editor notes read. It identifies itself as a permitted reprint authored by the Christchurch Call team, displayed10February2025; CCF index cards display12February. These publication labels are not proof of two partnerships or executed contract dates. It sets out intentions to help smaller services handle TVEC, redirect users and develop detection/upload-prevention/removal tools. It does not name a particular delivered toolkit, source database, licence or moderation-policy gate. This same-authorship reprint is not independent corroboration of performance. Its existence places announced collaboration before the October2025 contribution period, so the later award must not be described as founding ROOST or initiating the entire partnership.</p>\n<h2 id=\"consequence-and-remaining-question\">Consequence and remaining question</h2>\n<p>This establishes a funded programme identity: contribution26007 to CCF is associated with Elevate and an already announced ROOST relationship. It still does not identify which ROOST code or services were financed, nor whether a produced classification was used to restrict an account or content. Coop, Osprey and ROOST model tools appeared in general blog discovery, but none is promoted here to an Elevate deliverable. A programme report/repository attribution, funding schedule or recipient acceptance record would make that next join concrete.</p>\n<p>The current claims could describe both greater accessibility of safety software and greater spread of shared classification practices. The source material does not yet choose between those effects. Source rights, defaults and exercised recipient decisions in the parallel tool lane are the discriminator.</p>\n<p>Four root ordinary GETs: three CCF error responses, one substantive ROOST-hosted original (SHA256fc5ed59a39aa8049dae94186064b0da163a09854eecc47911d52b981d45d348b). ccf-captures.json records exact status and bytes. No forms, contact, accounts, harmful content or live APIs accessed. Root search was bounded to CCF/ROOST/Elevate identity and possible GitHub target; no genuine CCF repository found. Unrelated search results, Catalyst gaming training, third-party newsletter revenue estimates and later report citations were discovery only, not new findings. No new branch before the combined forest.</p>",
        "path": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09/ccf-programme.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-investment2025",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-elevate",
          "w27-roost-s-ccf-roost-reprint"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition closed for this lane; ROOST governance and tools lanes continue. This is the recipient-side programme crosswalk, not a finding of completed software delivery.\n\nCCF Canadian-investment announcement (see source references) full substantive body/Notes read through primary reader, lines14–43. It names Elevate, the Community Resilience Fund support and ROOST collaboration, with an attributed statement by ROOST president Camille Francois. Its rounded amount matches the separately retained Canadian contribution26007; it is not a second award. It describes a three-year programme spanning interventions, open-source tools, benchmarks and capacity. Earlier leader priorities in2022/23 are described, so this announcement alone cannot show the2025 donor originated the policy. The claimed Canadian role in shaping international technology governance is the recipient's characterization, not a specified contractual right. No payment receipt, subcontract amount, acceptance record or named deployed product appears. Original GET403 retained as error; no retry.\n\nCharting a Collective Response (see source references) full substantive indexed-primary text read, direct reader404 and GET403 closed. It describes initial needs assessment/experimentation, later continuing tool development and parallel support for smaller platforms with ROOST. This is programme sequencing and intent, not an implementation report.\n\nCurrent Elevate programme page (see source references) indexed substantive body read, undated snapshot. It ties the programme to Canada's CRF, ROOST and the community, and describes work on AI standards/benchmarks and a toolkit for smaller providers. The page advertises a GitHub link, but the available index supplies no target and its GET403/reader-cache-miss routes are closed. No repository identity or deployed software crosswalk is established by that link label. The history-page indexed Elevate entry says12November2025 launch; other historical claims there were not acquired for use.\n\nROOST-hosted CCF partnership announcement (see source references) original retained and full main body/editor notes read. It identifies itself as a permitted reprint authored by the Christchurch Call team, displayed10February2025; CCF index cards display12February. These publication labels are not proof of two partnerships or executed contract dates. It sets out intentions to help smaller services handle TVEC, redirect users and develop detection/upload-prevention/removal tools. It does not name a particular delivered toolkit, source database, licence or moderation-policy gate. This same-authorship reprint is not independent corroboration of performance. Its existence places announced collaboration before the October2025 contribution period, so the later award must not be described as founding ROOST or initiating the entire partnership.\n\n## Consequence and remaining question\n\nThis establishes a funded programme identity: contribution26007 to CCF is associated with Elevate and an already announced ROOST relationship. It still does not identify which ROOST code or services were financed, nor whether a produced classification was used to restrict an account or content. Coop, Osprey and ROOST model tools appeared in general blog discovery, but none is promoted here to an Elevate deliverable. A programme report/repository attribution, funding schedule or recipient acceptance record would make that next join concrete.\n\nThe current claims could describe both greater accessibility of safety software and greater spread of shared classification practices. The source material does not yet choose between those effects. Source rights, defaults and exercised recipient decisions in the parallel tool lane are the discriminator.\n\nFour root ordinary GETs: three CCF error responses, one substantive ROOST-hosted original (SHA256fc5ed59a39aa8049dae94186064b0da163a09854eecc47911d52b981d45d348b). ccf-captures.json records exact status and bytes. No forms, contact, accounts, harmful content or live APIs accessed. Root search was bounded to CCF/ROOST/Elevate identity and possible GitHub target; no genuine CCF repository found. Unrelated search results, Catalyst gaming training, third-party newsletter revenue estimates and later report citations were discovery only, not new findings. No new branch before the combined forest.\n",
        "file": "research/roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-ccf-programme.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding",
        "title": "ROOST: governance, operational home and funding",
        "description": "Bounded public-source acquisition completed 9 September 2026. This is a candidate research packet, not a case mutation. Read alongside root's ccf-programme.md; code/access is a separate lane. The exact Canadian contribution record was already in the accepted Christchurch wave and was not fetched again.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded public-source acquisition completed 9 September 2026. This is a candidate research packet, not a case mutation. Read alongside root&#x27;s <code>ccf-programme.md</code>; code/access is a separate lane. The exact Canadian contribution record was already acquired in the accepted Christchurch wave and was not fetched again.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding\">Finding</h2>\n<p>ROOST has a documented route from board appointment to technical roadmap to code-maintainer decisions. It also has a separate employment arrangement, while its published fundraising total combines financial and in-kind resources. The acquired records establish these different kinds of authority; they do not establish that a founding partner, employer intermediary or the Canadian government can direct a particular deployed content decision.</p>\n<h2 id=\"legal-and-operational-home\">Legal and operational home</h2>\n<p>ROOST&#x27;s [privacy statement](http[local research file] effective 28 October 2025, identifies <strong>Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc</strong> as the entity processing personal data for covered websites/events. Its current site footer reports 501(c)(3) public-charity status and <strong>EIN 33-3305434</strong>. These are the organization&#x27;s legal/tax representations, not an independently obtained IRS determination or incorporation instrument. The website notice does not govern every product merely because it uses ROOST code. Source: <code>governance-privacy.html</code>, Privacy Statement and Contact Us; footer independently read on the official web reader.</p>\n<p>Columbia SIPA&#x27;s [19 February 2025 announcement](http[local research file] describes incubation at its Institute of Global Politics, founding president Camille François, and prospective operation as an independent nonprofit retaining close collaboration with Columbia. This proves the institution&#x27;s account of incubation and intended separation, not a university ownership interest or transfer agreement. Full substantive announcement read through the primary-site web reader, lines 136–156. Ordinary GET returned a retained 403 challenge; that file is <strong>not</strong> the announcement&#x27;s original content.</p>\n<p>A current [Marketing Manager listing linked directly from ROOST&#x27;s Careers page](http[local research file] says US-based individuals will be employed by <strong>Global Impact on behalf of ROOST</strong>. The position reports to ROOST&#x27;s COO. This is a concrete advertised employment/operating relationship, not proof this vacancy was filled, every existing staff member has that employer, or Global Impact owns ROOST&#x27;s grants. The posting&#x27;s publication date is not established; it was live on 9 September 2026. No fiscal sponsorship, employer-services agreement or payment record was acquired. Source: <code>governance-marketing-role.html</code>, Compensation and Structure; source-discovery parent <code>governance-careers.html</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-can-decide-what\">Who can decide what</h2>\n<p>The current [Project Roles policy](http[local research file] expressly assigns:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Actor</th>\n<th>Published decision/resource role</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>ROOST</td>\n<td>Repository administration; infrastructure, connections, specialists and some engineering capacity. Initially appoints maintainers; may replace them for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Board</td>\n<td>Appoints the Technical Design Committee (TDC).</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>TDC</td>\n<td>Overarching technical direction/roadmap; consultation or tie-breaking for maintainer teams.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Maintainers</td>\n<td>Day-to-day development, project/release management and merge approval under ROOST branch protections; can appoint additional/replacement maintainers.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Contributors/community</td>\n<td>Propose changes; community membership alone grants no explicit permissions.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The policy says employer organizations are not automatically contributors/maintainers. It permits partner GitHub teams for access administration, including prerelease repositories. It identifies open-source forking as a check on repository control. These are published rules, not an audit of their use or proof that downstream platforms must accept an upstream update. <strong>Source:</strong> <code>governance-roles.html</code>, entire substantive page; undated current snapshot. The actual identity of repository maintainers and runtime behavior belong to the code lane.</p>\n<p>The [26 November 2025 governance explanation](http[local research file] describes a light, evolving governance approach: the initial TDC was recruited by ROOST, with future selection arrangements still to be developed. It also says users can offer feedback privately or pseudonymously and distinguishes shared infrastructure from platform-specific signals and decision logic. Do not backdate the more explicit current Roles policy to the earliest partnership. Source: <code>governance-design2025.html</code>, full substantive body, particularly Decision making, TDC and Staying secure sections.</p>\n<p>The [current Team page](http[local research file] lists Clint Smith (Discord legal chief) and Eli Sugarman (Hewlett Foundation special-projects director) as co-chairs, François as president/CEO, and other board members including Mark Surman (Mozilla), Vincent Courson (Google), Audrey Tang, Angela Lungati, Jamil Jaffer, Megan Smith and Niki Christoff. Its TDC includes Naren Koneru (Roblox) and ROOST CTO Vinay Rao as co-chairs; other listed people include OpenAI&#x27;s Sam Toizer, Discord&#x27;s Hailey Elizabeth, <strong>Cash App/Afterpay engineering lead Shu Lei</strong>, GitHub&#x27;s Tom Thorley, Rebecca Portnoff and Tim Pepper. These are named individual roles and listed affiliations, not employer-controlled seats or voting blocs. Source: <code>governance-team.html</code>, Staff/Board/TDC, full body read.</p>\n<p>Chronology matters: the [22 December 2025 board announcement](http[local research file] calls this an inaugural board and uses Chair/Vice-Chair for Smith/Sugarman. The February launch already names Smith as board chair. Therefore December is an announcement date, not demonstrated first existence of a board. The exact co-chair transition, board appointment/removal rules, voting thresholds, reserved donor rights and approved budget delegations remain unacquired. Source: <code>governance-board2025.html</code>, full substantive body; compare launch below.</p>\n<h2 id=\"financing-the-headline-is-not-a-cash-balance\">Financing: the headline is not a cash balance</h2>\n<p>ROOST&#x27;s [10 February 2025 distributed launch release](http[local research file] says it had raised <strong>more than $27 million for its first four operating years</strong>. It names Eric Schmidt, Discord, OpenAI, Google, Roblox, Knight Foundation, AI Collaborative, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation and Project Liberty Institute as founding partners. This is an issuer press release distributed by PR Newswire (SOURCE ROOST), not independent reporting. It does not allocate individual contributions, disclose restrictions or establish cash received. Source: <code>governance-launch2025.html</code>, complete release body excluding distributor navigation/marketing; exact currency is expressed as dollars without an acquired currency annotation.</p>\n<p>The same-date [president&#x27;s launch letter](http[local research file] instead uses <strong>$28 million in initial funding</strong>; the [4 June 2025 first-100-days update](http[local research file] specifies <strong>$28.5 million in funding and in-kind contributions</strong>. These differing dates/descriptions cannot safely be subtracted to create fresh grants or summed. The June account attributes capacity to founding-partner support, but no cash/in-kind schedule, valuation method, audited reconciliation, individual grant contract or CCF allocation was acquired. Source: <code>governance-100days.html</code>, Building an Organization for Change; <code>governance-gratitude2025.html</code>, opening.</p>\n<p>The [current partnerships page](http[local research file] separates founding partners from partners; CCF appears in the latter. Logos are partnership labels, not donor-payment evidence. Its founder label for SCSP does not identify the legal vehicle behind every Schmidt-associated resource. No Carnegie entity is newly introduced by this packet.</p>\n<h2 id=\"connection-to-the-existing-case\">Connection to the existing case</h2>\n<p>The February launch letter credits <strong>CCF/Paul Ash</strong> for planned joint technical and information solutions supporting the Call. It separately credits <strong>Tech Coalition/Sean Litton, Lauren Tharp and Kay Chau</strong> with child-safety expertise, alongside a quotation about the Coalition&#x27;s Pathways capacity-building programme. The author expressly describes ROOST as not a corporate membership organization. These are source-attributed collaboration/expertise relations; they do not establish Lantern data sharing, a Tech Coalition grant, or ROOST membership in the Coalition. Source: <code>governance-gratitude2025.html</code>, CCF/Tech Coalition paragraphs and paragraph preceding philanthropic partners.</p>\n<p>Accepted prior record: [Public Safety Canada contribution26007](http[local research file] CAD1,369,064 to <strong>The Christchurch Call Foundation</strong>, 23 October 2025–31 March 2028, includes a ROOST partnership in three expected workstreams. The retained original is <code>../christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09/transition-canada26007.html</code>, SHA256 <code>df2b85ed3c34f56a465fa769bdba2bee05b829fd67f710ac5d4318e1ab6cf352</code>. It does not turn the whole contribution into a ROOST subaward or identify authority over ROOST&#x27;s maintainers. Root owns new programme/output findings; this packet does not duplicate or pre-judge them.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relations-and-next-decisive-record\">Candidate relations and next decisive record</h2>\n<p>For integration, reuse the existing CCF, Columbia, Discord, OpenAI, Google, Roblox, Tech Coalition and other exact identities where they resolve. The meaningful new relationship types are <strong>incubation</strong>, <strong>advertised employer</strong>, <strong>named board/technical role</strong>, <strong>appoints</strong>, <strong>roadmap authority</strong>, <strong>merge/release authority</strong>, <strong>fundraising reported</strong> and <strong>collaboration/expertise reported</strong>. Avoid converting the entire roster into control edges. The Canadian edge remains a CCF award with an expected partnership purpose.</p>\n<p>The highest-yield missing instruments are the CCF–ROOST project agreement/budget and its acceptance schedule; ROOST&#x27;s board constitution/budget delegations; donor contribution schedules separating money from donated resources; and the Global Impact service/fiscal arrangement. These would establish who can withhold resources, approve work or redirect it. Ordinary employer administration, charitable resource pooling and maintainers&#x27; independent technical judgment remain live alternative explanations to a donor-directed policy chain.</p>\n<h2 id=\"acquisition-frontier\">Acquisition frontier</h2>\n<p>Twelve ordinary public GETs: eleven substantive HTML originals and one Columbia 403 challenge. Columbia&#x27;s primary web reader supplied the substantive substitute; no retry or proxy was used. Companion <code>governance-captures.json</code> records each URL, response status, original SHA256, derivative text, reading scope and exclusions. All substantive originals were read in their stated scope. No repository execution, API account, contact, application submission or money movement occurred.</p>\n<p>Finite searches covered ROOST governance/legal identity, its exact EIN, technical committee, and targeted ROOST + Google/McGovern/Global Impact funding combinations. Several combined searches produced irrelevant results or none. They do not establish the absence of financial records. No original IRS determination, constitutional instrument, restricted grant agreement or partner-specific cash receipt was located in this bounded pass. An initial overlong search response was truncated before any results could be inspected; it is not evidence. Acquisition is closed for the combined forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09/governance-funding.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roost-privacy",
          "w27-roost-s-columbia-incubation",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-careers",
          "w27-roost-s-global-impact-employment",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-roles",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-design2025",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-team",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-board2025",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-launch",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-gratitude",
          "w27-roost-s-roost-100days"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded public-source acquisition completed 9 September 2026. This is a candidate research packet, not a case mutation. Read alongside root's `ccf-programme.md`; code/access is a separate lane. The exact Canadian contribution record was already acquired in the accepted Christchurch wave and was not fetched again.\n\n## Finding\n\nROOST has a documented route from board appointment to technical roadmap to code-maintainer decisions. It also has a separate employment arrangement, while its published fundraising total combines financial and in-kind resources. The acquired records establish these different kinds of authority; they do not establish that a founding partner, employer intermediary or the Canadian government can direct a particular deployed content decision.\n\n## Legal and operational home\n\nROOST's privacy statement (see source references) effective 28 October 2025, identifies **Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc** as the entity processing personal data for covered websites/events. Its current site footer reports 501(c)(3) public-charity status and **EIN 33-3305434**. These are the organization's legal/tax representations, not an independently obtained IRS determination or incorporation instrument. The website notice does not govern every product merely because it uses ROOST code. Source: `governance-privacy.html`, Privacy Statement and Contact Us; footer independently read on the official web reader.\n\nColumbia SIPA's 19 February 2025 announcement (see source references) describes incubation at its Institute of Global Politics, founding president Camille François, and prospective operation as an independent nonprofit retaining close collaboration with Columbia. This proves the institution's account of incubation and intended separation, not a university ownership interest or transfer agreement. Full substantive announcement read through the primary-site web reader, lines 136–156. Ordinary GET returned a retained 403 challenge; that file is **not** the announcement's original content.\n\nA current Marketing Manager listing linked directly from ROOST's Careers page (see source references) says US-based individuals will be employed by **Global Impact on behalf of ROOST**. The position reports to ROOST's COO. This is a concrete advertised employment/operating relationship, not proof this vacancy was filled, every existing staff member has that employer, or Global Impact owns ROOST's grants. The posting's publication date is not established; it was live on 9 September 2026. No fiscal sponsorship, employer-services agreement or payment record was acquired. Source: `governance-marketing-role.html`, Compensation and Structure; source-discovery parent `governance-careers.html`.\n\n## Who can decide what\n\nThe current Project Roles policy (see source references) expressly assigns:\n\n| Actor | Published decision/resource role |\n| --- | --- |\n| ROOST | Repository administration; infrastructure, connections, specialists and some engineering capacity. Initially appoints maintainers; may replace them for inactivity, vacancy or misconduct. |\n| Board | Appoints the Technical Design Committee (TDC). |\n| TDC | Overarching technical direction/roadmap; consultation or tie-breaking for maintainer teams. |\n| Maintainers | Day-to-day development, project/release management and merge approval under ROOST branch protections; can appoint additional/replacement maintainers. |\n| Contributors/community | Propose changes; community membership alone grants no explicit permissions. |\n\nThe policy says employer organizations are not automatically contributors/maintainers. It permits partner GitHub teams for access administration, including prerelease repositories. It identifies open-source forking as a check on repository control. These are published rules, not an audit of their use or proof that downstream platforms must accept an upstream update. **Source:** `governance-roles.html`, entire substantive page; undated current snapshot. The actual identity of repository maintainers and runtime behavior belong to the code lane.\n\nThe 26 November 2025 governance explanation (see source references) describes a light, evolving governance approach: the initial TDC was recruited by ROOST, with future selection arrangements still to be developed. It also says users can offer feedback privately or pseudonymously and distinguishes shared infrastructure from platform-specific signals and decision logic. Do not backdate the more explicit current Roles policy to the earliest partnership. Source: `governance-design2025.html`, full substantive body, particularly Decision making, TDC and Staying secure sections.\n\nThe current Team page (see source references) lists Clint Smith (Discord legal chief) and Eli Sugarman (Hewlett Foundation special-projects director) as co-chairs, François as president/CEO, and other board members including Mark Surman (Mozilla), Vincent Courson (Google), Audrey Tang, Angela Lungati, Jamil Jaffer, Megan Smith and Niki Christoff. Its TDC includes Naren Koneru (Roblox) and ROOST CTO Vinay Rao as co-chairs; other listed people include OpenAI's Sam Toizer, Discord's Hailey Elizabeth, **Cash App/Afterpay engineering lead Shu Lei**, GitHub's Tom Thorley, Rebecca Portnoff and Tim Pepper. These are named individual roles and listed affiliations, not employer-controlled seats or voting blocs. Source: `governance-team.html`, Staff/Board/TDC, full body read.\n\nChronology matters: the 22 December 2025 board announcement (see source references) calls this an inaugural board and uses Chair/Vice-Chair for Smith/Sugarman. The February launch already names Smith as board chair. Therefore December is an announcement date, not demonstrated first existence of a board. The exact co-chair transition, board appointment/removal rules, voting thresholds, reserved donor rights and approved budget delegations remain unacquired. Source: `governance-board2025.html`, full substantive body; compare launch below.\n\n## Financing: the headline is not a cash balance\n\nROOST's 10 February 2025 distributed launch release (see source references) says it had raised **more than $27 million for its first four operating years**. It names Eric Schmidt, Discord, OpenAI, Google, Roblox, Knight Foundation, AI Collaborative, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation and Project Liberty Institute as founding partners. This is an issuer press release distributed by PR Newswire (SOURCE ROOST), not independent reporting. It does not allocate individual contributions, disclose restrictions or establish cash received. Source: `governance-launch2025.html`, complete release body excluding distributor navigation/marketing; exact currency is expressed as dollars without an acquired currency annotation.\n\nThe same-date president's launch letter (see source references) instead uses **$28 million in initial funding**; the 4 June 2025 first-100-days update (see source references) specifies **$28.5 million in funding and in-kind contributions**. These differing dates/descriptions cannot safely be subtracted to create fresh grants or summed. The June account attributes capacity to founding-partner support, but no cash/in-kind schedule, valuation method, audited reconciliation, individual grant contract or CCF allocation was acquired. Source: `governance-100days.html`, Building an Organization for Change; `governance-gratitude2025.html`, opening.\n\nThe current partnerships page (see source references) separates founding partners from partners; CCF appears in the latter. Logos are partnership labels, not donor-payment evidence. Its founder label for SCSP does not identify the legal vehicle behind every Schmidt-associated resource. No Carnegie entity is newly introduced by this packet.\n\n## Connection to the existing case\n\nThe February launch letter credits **CCF/Paul Ash** for planned joint technical and information solutions supporting the Call. It separately credits **Tech Coalition/Sean Litton, Lauren Tharp and Kay Chau** with child-safety expertise, alongside a quotation about the Coalition's Pathways capacity-building programme. The author expressly describes ROOST as not a corporate membership organization. These are source-attributed collaboration/expertise relations; they do not establish Lantern data sharing, a Tech Coalition grant, or ROOST membership in the Coalition. Source: `governance-gratitude2025.html`, CCF/Tech Coalition paragraphs and paragraph preceding philanthropic partners.\n\nAccepted prior record: Public Safety Canada contribution26007 (see source references) CAD1,369,064 to **The Christchurch Call Foundation**, 23 October 2025–31 March 2028, includes a ROOST partnership in three expected workstreams. The retained original is `../christchurch-governance-wave-2026-09-09/transition-canada26007.html`, SHA256 `df2b85ed3c34f56a465fa769bdba2bee05b829fd67f710ac5d4318e1ab6cf352`. It does not turn the whole contribution into a ROOST subaward or identify authority over ROOST's maintainers. Root owns new programme/output findings; this packet does not duplicate or pre-judge them.\n\n## Candidate relations and next decisive record\n\nFor integration, reuse the existing CCF, Columbia, Discord, OpenAI, Google, Roblox, Tech Coalition and other exact identities where they resolve. The meaningful new relationship types are **incubation**, **advertised employer**, **named board/technical role**, **appoints**, **roadmap authority**, **merge/release authority**, **fundraising reported** and **collaboration/expertise reported**. Avoid converting the entire roster into control edges. The Canadian edge remains a CCF award with an expected partnership purpose.\n\nThe highest-yield missing instruments are the CCF–ROOST project agreement/budget and its acceptance schedule; ROOST's board constitution/budget delegations; donor contribution schedules separating money from donated resources; and the Global Impact service/fiscal arrangement. These would establish who can withhold resources, approve work or redirect it. Ordinary employer administration, charitable resource pooling and maintainers' independent technical judgment remain live alternative explanations to a donor-directed policy chain.\n\n## Acquisition frontier\n\nTwelve ordinary public GETs: eleven substantive HTML originals and one Columbia 403 challenge. Columbia's primary web reader supplied the substantive substitute; no retry or proxy was used. Companion `governance-captures.json` records each URL, response status, original SHA256, derivative text, reading scope and exclusions. All substantive originals were read in their stated scope. No repository execution, API account, contact, application submission or money movement occurred.\n\nFinite searches covered ROOST governance/legal identity, its exact EIN, technical committee, and targeted ROOST + Google/McGovern/Global Impact funding combinations. Several combined searches produced irrelevant results or none. They do not establish the absence of financial records. No original IRS determination, constitutional instrument, restricted grant agreement or partner-specific cash receipt was located in this bounded pass. An initial overlong search response was truncated before any results could be inspected; it is not evidence. Acquisition is closed for the combined forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-governance-funding.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance",
        "title": "CCF policy as a public ROOST model input",
        "description": "9 September2026. Bounded tool-governance acquisition closed. A named CCF contribution is now inspectable: a TVEC policy prompt pack in ROOST's Model Community repository. It is a template and accompanying evaluation/context documents, not proof that Coop, Osprey or a named platform deployed the policy, or that Canada accepted it under contribution26007. No m",
        "html": "<p>9 September2026. Bounded tool-governance acquisition closed. A named CCF contribution is now inspectable: a TVEC policy prompt pack in ROOST&#x27;s Model Community repository. It is a template and accompanying evaluation/context documents, not proof that Coop, Osprey or a named platform deployed the policy, or that Canada accepted it under contribution26007. No model, API, underlying harmful-content dataset, account or submission was used.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-was-actually-released\">What was actually released</h2>\n<p>The [pinned CCF pack](http[local research file] contains four files: a text-classification policy, an annex comparing definitions, an annex supplying actor context and an evaluation report. The repository [README](http[local research file] lines19–26, expressly describes this area as partner-contributed policy prompts organized by submitter for use with policy-following models. Annex2 expressly speaks as the Christchurch Call Foundation. This is stronger attribution than a directory name alone.</p>\n<p>Inspected repository revision: <code>22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6</code>, whose public API commit record is dated20August2026. This is the version pin, not the pack&#x27;s initial-publication date. A path-scoped [27May2026 relocation commit](http[local research file] names Juliet Shen as author, credits Mackenzie as coauthor and describes relocation of the CCF policy from <code>gpt-oss-safeguard/projects/tvec-policy</code> with no content changes. That is repository attribution and a commit-message claim, not proof of each person&#x27;s employer, drafting approval or independent verification of the rename. A finite five-result query of that stated earlier path returns7May2026 organization commits credited to Mackenzie. It was not an exhaustive history or proof of first publication. The evaluation&#x27;s17April2026 update date is a document date, not a repository-release date.</p>\n<p>The current [roadmap](http[local research file] describes the Model Community as a way to convert traditional policies into model-ready prompts and distribute implementation knowledge. The [11December2025 roadmap announcement](http[local research file] What We&#x27;re Building, specifically planned2026 access to sample TVEC policies. Neither inspected roadmap nor these four pack files establishes a budget allocation, accepted Canadian milestone or CCF programme exclusivity. Root&#x27;s <code>ccf-programme.md</code> owns that separate evidence. No generalized Coop/Osprey-to-CCF funding edge is supported.</p>\n<h2 id=\"where-the-policy-places-judgment\">Where the policy places judgment</h2>\n<p>The template defines terrorism and violent extremism, assigns eight categories to a removal heading, and supplies a separate permissible-content heading. Its credible-threat category adds an instruction to escalate to law enforcement and normally requires at least two listed indicators. The EDSA/newsworthiness category expressly calls for human review. These are desired labels/actions in a prompt template; no inspected execution path sends a report or removes content. Locators: <code>tools-tvec-policy.txt</code> lines5–15,25–43,101–123.</p>\n<p>The categories extend beyond official branded material into material support, recruitment, praise/promotion and incitement. Annex2 recommends combining actor, content and behavior signals, warns that designations can be politicized and incomplete, and treats UN/EU/FiveEyes lists as contextual signals rather than an exclusive truth source. CCF supplies its own limited incident/perpetrator list, selected where it engaged its crisis protocol and/or an attack referenced the Christchurch attacker. It expressly says the list is not comprehensive and not every listed person faced a terrorism/violent-extremism charge or investigation. This is CCF selecting context for classification; it does not make each entry a legally certified terrorist. No individual incident/person nodes are warranted. Locators: annex2 lines3–31 and table32–65.</p>\n<p>Annex1 compares legal and scholarly approaches and notes absence of a universally agreed definition. Its external legal references remain the author&#x27;s comparison; this run did not independently verify the current laws, lists or incident entries. The policy text&#x27;s chosen definition is not itself a statute or proof of mandatory government instructions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"adaptation-rights-and-correction-limits\">Adaptation rights and correction limits</h2>\n<p>The repository carries a [CC-BY4.0 licence](http[local research file] Sections2–3 permit reproduction and adaptation of licensed material subject to attribution, notices and identifying changes; section2 excludes implied endorsement and preserves distinct noncopyright rights. Section5 supplies an as-is disclaimer. Section6 provides termination for noncompliance and restoration rules; stopping distribution does not itself terminate an otherwise valid licence. These are the published repository terms, not an acquired signed CCF agreement or permission to use external training data, hash databases or separately licensed model weights.</p>\n<p>The README invites issue reports, discussions and iterative feedback to model creators, and supports configurable policy-following models. That makes independent adaptation and public feedback possible. It does not establish a required patch/adoption schedule, an affected user&#x27;s appeal, or mandatory propagation of a corrected prompt into recipients&#x27; deployed systems. The precise project-maintainer/TDC rights belong to Linnaeus&#x27;s governance lane. No case-specific model deployment, policy variant, update acknowledgement, enforcement adapter or restored item was acquired here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-evaluation-supports\">What the evaluation supports</h2>\n<p>The74-line report is labelled17April2026 and names gpt-oss-safeguard without an exact checkpoint or complete reproducibility package. It reports170 examples:114 true positives,12 false negatives, zero false positives and44 true negatives against evaluator/team judgments. It reports90.5% recall and100% precision for that sample. This does not establish perfect general accuracy or legal ground truth. Recruitment recall is12/17, approximately71%, below its own85% target. The failure discussion explicitly says team experts disagreed with the model&#x27;s threshold interpretation in four examples and suggests policy refinement; that is a disclosed source of classificatory judgment, not demonstrated political misuse. Locators: <code>tools-tvec-evaluation.md</code> lines3–62.</p>\n<p>The report also gives72.2% precision for EDSA classification and explains that confusion concerns two permissible categories, rather than those errors admitting violative content. Preserve this alongside the binary zero-false-positive result. The raw examples, annotation/adjudication protocol, evaluation script, exact model checkpoint and run settings were not identified in the four-file pack; no performance test was run.</p>\n<p>Two observable textual tensions deserve reconciliation before interpreting a deployment. TVEC0 references <code>INCITE1</code>, which is undefined within the policy. The EDSA section says its exception does not apply if content falls into any TVEC1–8 category, while the evaluation describes otherwise-TVEC content permitted for an EDSA purpose. The template&#x27;s examples also include journalism and research. Context precedence and intended exception handling therefore require a version-specific interpretation/test; neither a concrete over-removal incident nor the impossibility of an exception follows from this text alone.</p>\n<h2 id=\"forest-implication-and-finite-frontier\">Forest implication and finite frontier</h2>\n<p>The new bridge is CCF-authored policy/context entering a public collection intended for direct model use. This is a concrete path by which an institution&#x27;s definitions and judgments can travel, alongside meaningful freedom to adapt them. It is distinct from government financial acceptance, mandatory adoption, a model&#x27;s actual output and a platform&#x27;s action. A source contribution can shape defaults without giving its author universal enforcement authority.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are a named adopter&#x27;s exact prompt/model/configuration and review/enforcement route; a resolved interpretation of the exception text; and the matched CCF/Canada output schedule and acceptance record. For the claimed evaluation, a benign or suitably redacted reproducibility package would distinguish the documented finite test from general performance. No new branch is opened here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-read-scope\">Custody and read scope</h2>\n<p><code>tools-captures.json</code> records14 successful original/API responses with hashes, exact URLs, commit and read scopes, plus two reader/access-history observations. All four CCF files were read completely: policy123lines, annex1 62lines, annex2 65lines, evaluation74lines. The92-line README was read completely. Licence scope is its title, selected definitions and sections2–6 with supplementary terms through line372; not every introductory/footer line. Roadmap and announcement substantive bodies were read; media and links were not automatically treated as read. Repository listings were discovery metadata only. All originals are public unauthenticated response bytes; derived text is separately labelled.</p>\n<p>The roadmap reader failed with a cache miss; its sole normal GET substitute succeeded. The exact GitHub policy-directory reader returned429; after a pause, one ordinary public API route supplied the listing and pinned source URLs. No access restriction was bypassed. Previously closed CCF403 routes were not retried. Six targeted queries were used for CCF/Elevate/TVEC/roadmap discovery; irrelevant municipal and similarly named software results were discarded. No code installation, model inference, form, private dataset or outreach occurred. The candidate case, atlas and ZIP remain untouched.</p>",
        "path": "roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09/tool-governance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w27-roost-s-roadmap",
          "w27-roost-s-roadmap2025",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-pin",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-readme",
          "w27-roost-s-rmc-ccby",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-policy",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex1",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-annex2",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-evaluation",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-relocation",
          "w27-roost-s-tvec-prior-path"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September2026. Bounded tool-governance acquisition closed. A named CCF contribution is now inspectable: a TVEC policy prompt pack in ROOST's Model Community repository. It is a template and accompanying evaluation/context documents, not proof that Coop, Osprey or a named platform deployed the policy, or that Canada accepted it under contribution26007. No model, API, underlying harmful-content dataset, account or submission was used.\n\n## What was actually released\n\nThe pinned CCF pack (see source references) contains four files: a text-classification policy, an annex comparing definitions, an annex supplying actor context and an evaluation report. The repository README (see source references) lines19–26, expressly describes this area as partner-contributed policy prompts organized by submitter for use with policy-following models. Annex2 expressly speaks as the Christchurch Call Foundation. This is stronger attribution than a directory name alone.\n\nInspected repository revision: `22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6`, whose public API commit record is dated20August2026. This is the version pin, not the pack's initial-publication date. A path-scoped 27May2026 relocation commit (see source references) names Juliet Shen as author, credits Mackenzie as coauthor and describes relocation of the CCF policy from `gpt-oss-safeguard/projects/tvec-policy` with no content changes. That is repository attribution and a commit-message claim, not proof of each person's employer, drafting approval or independent verification of the rename. A finite five-result query of that stated earlier path returns7May2026 organization commits credited to Mackenzie. It was not an exhaustive history or proof of first publication. The evaluation's17April2026 update date is a document date, not a repository-release date.\n\nThe current roadmap (see source references) describes the Model Community as a way to convert traditional policies into model-ready prompts and distribute implementation knowledge. The 11December2025 roadmap announcement (see source references) What We're Building, specifically planned2026 access to sample TVEC policies. Neither inspected roadmap nor these four pack files establishes a budget allocation, accepted Canadian milestone or CCF programme exclusivity. Root's `ccf-programme.md` owns that separate evidence. No generalized Coop/Osprey-to-CCF funding edge is supported.\n\n## Where the policy places judgment\n\nThe template defines terrorism and violent extremism, assigns eight categories to a removal heading, and supplies a separate permissible-content heading. Its credible-threat category adds an instruction to escalate to law enforcement and normally requires at least two listed indicators. The EDSA/newsworthiness category expressly calls for human review. These are desired labels/actions in a prompt template; no inspected execution path sends a report or removes content. Locators: `tools-tvec-policy.txt` lines5–15,25–43,101–123.\n\nThe categories extend beyond official branded material into material support, recruitment, praise/promotion and incitement. Annex2 recommends combining actor, content and behavior signals, warns that designations can be politicized and incomplete, and treats UN/EU/FiveEyes lists as contextual signals rather than an exclusive truth source. CCF supplies its own limited incident/perpetrator list, selected where it engaged its crisis protocol and/or an attack referenced the Christchurch attacker. It expressly says the list is not comprehensive and not every listed person faced a terrorism/violent-extremism charge or investigation. This is CCF selecting context for classification; it does not make each entry a legally certified terrorist. No individual incident/person nodes are warranted. Locators: annex2 lines3–31 and table32–65.\n\nAnnex1 compares legal and scholarly approaches and notes absence of a universally agreed definition. Its external legal references remain the author's comparison; this run did not independently verify the current laws, lists or incident entries. The policy text's chosen definition is not itself a statute or proof of mandatory government instructions.\n\n## Adaptation rights and correction limits\n\nThe repository carries a CC-BY4.0 licence (see source references) Sections2–3 permit reproduction and adaptation of licensed material subject to attribution, notices and identifying changes; section2 excludes implied endorsement and preserves distinct noncopyright rights. Section5 supplies an as-is disclaimer. Section6 provides termination for noncompliance and restoration rules; stopping distribution does not itself terminate an otherwise valid licence. These are the published repository terms, not an acquired signed CCF agreement or permission to use external training data, hash databases or separately licensed model weights.\n\nThe README invites issue reports, discussions and iterative feedback to model creators, and supports configurable policy-following models. That makes independent adaptation and public feedback possible. It does not establish a required patch/adoption schedule, an affected user's appeal, or mandatory propagation of a corrected prompt into recipients' deployed systems. The precise project-maintainer/TDC rights belong to Linnaeus's governance lane. No case-specific model deployment, policy variant, update acknowledgement, enforcement adapter or restored item was acquired here.\n\n## What the evaluation supports\n\nThe74-line report is labelled17April2026 and names gpt-oss-safeguard without an exact checkpoint or complete reproducibility package. It reports170 examples:114 true positives,12 false negatives, zero false positives and44 true negatives against evaluator/team judgments. It reports90.5% recall and100% precision for that sample. This does not establish perfect general accuracy or legal ground truth. Recruitment recall is12/17, approximately71%, below its own85% target. The failure discussion explicitly says team experts disagreed with the model's threshold interpretation in four examples and suggests policy refinement; that is a disclosed source of classificatory judgment, not demonstrated political misuse. Locators: `tools-tvec-evaluation.md` lines3–62.\n\nThe report also gives72.2% precision for EDSA classification and explains that confusion concerns two permissible categories, rather than those errors admitting violative content. Preserve this alongside the binary zero-false-positive result. The raw examples, annotation/adjudication protocol, evaluation script, exact model checkpoint and run settings were not identified in the four-file pack; no performance test was run.\n\nTwo observable textual tensions deserve reconciliation before interpreting a deployment. TVEC0 references `INCITE1`, which is undefined within the policy. The EDSA section says its exception does not apply if content falls into any TVEC1–8 category, while the evaluation describes otherwise-TVEC content permitted for an EDSA purpose. The template's examples also include journalism and research. Context precedence and intended exception handling therefore require a version-specific interpretation/test; neither a concrete over-removal incident nor the impossibility of an exception follows from this text alone.\n\n## Forest implication and finite frontier\n\nThe new bridge is CCF-authored policy/context entering a public collection intended for direct model use. This is a concrete path by which an institution's definitions and judgments can travel, alongside meaningful freedom to adapt them. It is distinct from government financial acceptance, mandatory adoption, a model's actual output and a platform's action. A source contribution can shape defaults without giving its author universal enforcement authority.\n\nThe next discriminating records are a named adopter's exact prompt/model/configuration and review/enforcement route; a resolved interpretation of the exception text; and the matched CCF/Canada output schedule and acceptance record. For the claimed evaluation, a benign or suitably redacted reproducibility package would distinguish the documented finite test from general performance. No new branch is opened here.\n\n## Custody and read scope\n\n`tools-captures.json` records14 successful original/API responses with hashes, exact URLs, commit and read scopes, plus two reader/access-history observations. All four CCF files were read completely: policy123lines, annex1 62lines, annex2 65lines, evaluation74lines. The92-line README was read completely. Licence scope is its title, selected definitions and sections2–6 with supplementary terms through line372; not every introductory/footer line. Roadmap and announcement substantive bodies were read; media and links were not automatically treated as read. Repository listings were discovery metadata only. All originals are public unauthenticated response bytes; derived text is separately labelled.\n\nThe roadmap reader failed with a cache miss; its sole normal GET substitute succeeded. The exact GitHub policy-directory reader returned429; after a pause, one ordinary public API route supplied the listing and pinned source URLs. No access restriction was bypassed. Previously closed CCF403 routes were not retried. Six targeted queries were used for CCF/Elevate/TVEC/roadmap discovery; irrelevant municipal and similarly named software results were discarded. No code installation, model inference, form, private dataset or outreach occurred. The candidate case, atlas and ZIP remain untouched.\n",
        "file": "research/roost-programme-wave-2026-09-09-tool-governance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-filings",
        "title": "Briver compliance filings — bounded public-record result",
        "description": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. This lane did not acquire an actual Briver attestation, supporting domain evidence, paragraph 16 disclosure response, satisfaction of judgment, or Briver compliance/enforcement filing. It established the public court route and encountered its explicit human-verification boundary before any case-number search. The result is ",
        "html": "<p>Research cutoff: <strong>9 September 2026</strong>. This lane did <strong>not acquire an actual Briver attestation, supporting domain evidence, paragraph 16 disclosure response, satisfaction of judgment, or Briver compliance/enforcement filing</strong>. It established the public court route and encountered its explicit human-verification boundary before any case-number search. The result is an access and publication gap, not evidence that Briver failed to comply or that the records do not exist.</p>\n<p>The previously read judgment directs paragraph 16 information to <strong>the People</strong>, and paragraphs 17–18 attestations and supporting evidence to the People through the notice procedure in paragraph 47. It does not in those clauses require every response to be publicly filed with the court. Thus even a complete docket search would not necessarily disclose all compliance material. The City Attorney and Briver/counsel are the apparent primary holders of those responses; the court holds whatever was actually filed. This custody distinction comes from the <a href=\"/research/sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment\">accepted judgment analysis</a>, PDF pages 4–5 and 10 of the retained instrument, not a newly obtained response.</p>\n<h2 id=\"routes-and-limits\">Routes and limits</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Public route</th>\n<th>Exact scope and outcome</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>First indexed discovery batch</td>\n<td>Queries: <code>&quot;CGC-24-617237&quot; &quot;compliance&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;Briver&quot; &quot;attestation&quot; &quot;2025&quot;</code>; <code>site.sf.courts.ca.gov case information civil online case query</code>. The combined results exposed the official court access page, the already acquired judgment and a June 13, 2025 Tilak declaration. No actual Briver response was identified.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Official court access page</td>\n<td>[Case Information](http[local research file] The web reader returned 403 Forbidden; <strong>one ordinary GET substitute succeeded</strong>. The complete main Case Calendar &amp; Query content and actual Civil Case Query href were read. This page advertises civil case lookup; it is not the case’s docket.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Actual Civil Case Query link</td>\n<td><code>http[local research file]</code>. An ordinary GET returned the court’s gateway, which explicitly verifies a person rather than an automated program. No verification response, CAPTCHA solution or underlying CaseInfo.dll request was submitted. <strong>No case-number search or register-of-actions inspection occurred.</strong></td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Second indexed discovery batch</td>\n<td>Queries: <code>site:sf.gov &quot;Briver&quot; &quot;attestation&quot;</code>; <code>site:sfcityattorney.org &quot;Briver&quot; &quot;satisfaction&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;CGC-24-617237&quot; &quot;Briver&quot; &quot;compliance&quot;</code>. The combined returned material included the prior judgment and secondary explanatory articles, not a newly acquired Briver response, satisfaction or enforcement record. Secondary summaries were not accepted as implementation evidence.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Already retained Tilak declaration</td>\n<td>Root acquired the [June 13 declaration republished by Ars Technica](http[local research file] This lane performed only a targeted search of root’s local page-text derivatives for Briver, attestation, satisfaction, compliance and comply. The caption names Briver; the “Statement of Compliance” on PDF 47 concerns Companies Act 2006 registration. It is not a Briver judgment attestation. This limited search is not a full visual audit, and sparse/image-only extraction cannot prove absence from the PDF. Root owns substantive provider/disclosure review; it must remain separate from Briver compliance.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The exact gateway statement and successful original-response metadata are retained in <strong>filings-captures.json</strong> and <strong>filings-case-query-gateway.html/.txt</strong>. Its anti-automation condition is a site access boundary, not an automatic sandbox approval rejection. No attempt was made to work around it. Closed LegInfo routes were not revisited. The six queries are preserved in <strong>filings-query-log.json</strong>, a derived search log rather than a complete search-index snapshot.</p>\n<h2 id=\"retained-evidence\">Retained evidence</h2>\n<p><strong>filings-court-information.html</strong>: official court page, HTTP 200, 638,340 bytes, SHA-256 <code>bfe73a633bbe71ef78bc26bfd736eee6183d26d5cede085e78980ec1da5fc3f7</code>. Reading scope is the public main query content and link; navigation scripts are captured, not interpreted as case records.</p>\n<p><strong>filings-case-query-gateway.html</strong>: actual linked court gateway, HTTP 200, 2,167 bytes, SHA-256 <code>c1cb249fe448f2cd3687036b8bd0a48271f71cd853f0169161ebfefbe4e3adb0</code>. Complete visible text and form action were inspected. The case record remained inaccessible behind that boundary.</p>\n<p>Root’s separately retained <strong>tilak-declaration-june13-2025.pdf</strong>: SHA-256 <code>bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5</code>. No duplicate download occurred. Its primary-instrument content and republisher custody are described in root’s packet; this lane claims only the limited text-search scope above.</p>\n<h2 id=\"breakpoint\">Breakpoint</h2>\n<p>The strongest current conclusion is that the judgment created recurrent reporting and discovery rights, but this public pass did not verify their exercise or fulfillment. The missing discriminator remains the actual attestation with domain evidence, paragraph 16 response, payment/satisfaction record, or a court filing enforcing or recording those obligations. A legitimately supplied case file or a newly public city/court publication could reopen that question. No account, fee, contact, records submission, CAPTCHA solution, target-site visit or further research branch was undertaken.</p>",
        "path": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09/filings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-court-gateway"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research cutoff: **9 September 2026**. This lane did **not acquire an actual Briver attestation, supporting domain evidence, paragraph 16 disclosure response, satisfaction of judgment, or Briver compliance/enforcement filing**. It established the public court route and encountered its explicit human-verification boundary before any case-number search. The result is an access and publication gap, not evidence that Briver failed to comply or that the records do not exist.\n\nThe previously read judgment directs paragraph 16 information to **the People**, and paragraphs 17–18 attestations and supporting evidence to the People through the notice procedure in paragraph 47. It does not in those clauses require every response to be publicly filed with the court. Thus even a complete docket search would not necessarily disclose all compliance material. The City Attorney and Briver/counsel are the apparent primary holders of those responses; the court holds whatever was actually filed. This custody distinction comes from the [accepted judgment analysis](sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment.md), PDF pages 4–5 and 10 of the retained instrument, not a newly obtained response.\n\n## Routes and limits\n\n| Public route | Exact scope and outcome |\n| --- | --- |\n| First indexed discovery batch | Queries: `\"CGC-24-617237\" \"compliance\"`; `\"Briver\" \"attestation\" \"2025\"`; `site.sf.courts.ca.gov case information civil online case query`. The combined results exposed the official court access page, the already acquired judgment and a June 13, 2025 Tilak declaration. No actual Briver response was identified. |\n| Official court access page | Case Information (see source references) The web reader returned 403 Forbidden; **one ordinary GET substitute succeeded**. The complete main Case Calendar & Query content and actual Civil Case Query href were read. This page advertises civil case lookup; it is not the case’s docket. |\n| Actual Civil Case Query link | `http[local research file]`. An ordinary GET returned the court’s gateway, which explicitly verifies a person rather than an automated program. No verification response, CAPTCHA solution or underlying CaseInfo.dll request was submitted. **No case-number search or register-of-actions inspection occurred.** |\n| Second indexed discovery batch | Queries: `site:sf.gov \"Briver\" \"attestation\"`; `site:sfcityattorney.org \"Briver\" \"satisfaction\"`; `\"CGC-24-617237\" \"Briver\" \"compliance\"`. The combined returned material included the prior judgment and secondary explanatory articles, not a newly acquired Briver response, satisfaction or enforcement record. Secondary summaries were not accepted as implementation evidence. |\n| Already retained Tilak declaration | Root acquired the June 13 declaration republished by Ars Technica (see source references) This lane performed only a targeted search of root’s local page-text derivatives for Briver, attestation, satisfaction, compliance and comply. The caption names Briver; the “Statement of Compliance” on PDF 47 concerns Companies Act 2006 registration. It is not a Briver judgment attestation. This limited search is not a full visual audit, and sparse/image-only extraction cannot prove absence from the PDF. Root owns substantive provider/disclosure review; it must remain separate from Briver compliance. |\n\nThe exact gateway statement and successful original-response metadata are retained in **filings-captures.json** and **filings-case-query-gateway.html/.txt**. Its anti-automation condition is a site access boundary, not an automatic sandbox approval rejection. No attempt was made to work around it. Closed LegInfo routes were not revisited. The six queries are preserved in **filings-query-log.json**, a derived search log rather than a complete search-index snapshot.\n\n## Retained evidence\n\n**filings-court-information.html**: official court page, HTTP 200, 638,340 bytes, SHA-256 `bfe73a633bbe71ef78bc26bfd736eee6183d26d5cede085e78980ec1da5fc3f7`. Reading scope is the public main query content and link; navigation scripts are captured, not interpreted as case records.\n\n**filings-case-query-gateway.html**: actual linked court gateway, HTTP 200, 2,167 bytes, SHA-256 `c1cb249fe448f2cd3687036b8bd0a48271f71cd853f0169161ebfefbe4e3adb0`. Complete visible text and form action were inspected. The case record remained inaccessible behind that boundary.\n\nRoot’s separately retained **tilak-declaration-june13-2025.pdf**: SHA-256 `bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5`. No duplicate download occurred. Its primary-instrument content and republisher custody are described in root’s packet; this lane claims only the limited text-search scope above.\n\n## Breakpoint\n\nThe strongest current conclusion is that the judgment created recurrent reporting and discovery rights, but this public pass did not verify their exercise or fulfillment. The missing discriminator remains the actual attestation with domain evidence, paragraph 16 response, payment/satisfaction record, or a court filing enforcing or recording those obligations. A legitimately supplied case file or a newly public city/court publication could reopen that question. No account, fee, contact, records submission, CAPTCHA solution, target-site visit or further research branch was undertaken.\n",
        "file": "research/sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-filings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure",
        "title": "Provider disclosure and an attributed Australian lead",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root provider lane closed. Tilak declaration, filed 13 June 2025(httplocal research file republished by Ars Technica. Original custody and hash: tilak-capture.json. Retained PDF is 61 pages, 6,815,888 bytes, SHA256 bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root provider lane closed. [Tilak declaration, filed 13 June 2025](http[local research file] republished by Ars Technica. Original custody and hash: tilak-capture.json. Retained PDF is 61 pages, 6,815,888 bytes, SHA256 bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5.</p>\n<h2 id=\"findings-and-locators\">Findings and locators</h2>\n<p>The sworn declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom, not a Briver compliance certification. Paragraphs18–23 report subpoenas and responsive contact records from Cloudflare, Namecheap and former registrar Name.com. Paragraph29 reports Google&#x27;s June6,2025 production. Paragraphs24–30 describe subsequent notices and correspondence. These are counsel&#x27;s sworn accounts; actual subpoena and production instruments are not attached in this read scope. They establish a reported disclosure route, not provider shutdown instructions.</p>\n<p>Exhibit6 reproduces December2024–January2025 correspondence. A respondent associated by counsel with drawnudes.io claims eSafety requirements and compliance, including alleged January2025 legislation (PDF19,21). The respondent seeks written SF requirements and discusses territorial restrictions (PDF19,22). This is a respondent&#x27;s account and offer, not independent verification of Australian law, successful compliance, eSafety approval, or regulator-to-regulator coordination. No specific technical restriction or issuing provider is demonstrated by that exchange.</p>\n<p>The complete declaration and exhibit do not supply Briver&#x27;s required report or a named provider&#x27;s takedown command. The city-announced cooperation and this separate subpoena route must retain separate source ancestry.</p>\n<h2 id=\"read-scope\">Read scope</h2>\n<p>Root read the complete six-page declaration through the web reader, including the filed stamp, allegations about service attempts and signature, and complete Exhibit6 (PDF18–23) through retained extraction. Root visually checked PDF1,4,6,21,22. PDF21&#x27;s visually underlined eSafety reference has no URI annotation on that page in the retained PDF. That is not a finding about external links everywhere in the bundle. All61 pages were extracted for search; corporate-registration/profile/site exhibits outside those twelve pages were not substantively reviewed, and no whole-bundle-read claim is made. Residential addresses, private contact identifiers and unrelated personal profile details are not reproduced here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"bounded-acquisition-log\">Bounded acquisition log</h2>\n<p>Root searched seven queries: <code>&quot;Briver&quot; &quot;registrar&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;Sol Ecom&quot; &quot;registry&quot;</code>; <code>site.sfcityattorney.org &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;registrars&quot;</code>; <code>site.sf.gov &quot;deepfake&quot; &quot;registrars&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;San Francisco&quot; &quot;registries&quot; &quot;June 2, 2025&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;Chiu&quot; &quot;Briver&quot; &quot;cooperate&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;San Francisco&quot; &quot;registrars&quot; &quot;Namecheap&quot; deepfake</code>. Most results were unrelated, including different Briver entities. They were not identity evidence. The named-company query was a probe, not prior proof of involvement.</p>\n<p>The complete main body of Ars Technica&#x27;s16August2024 article was read. It supplies a lead concerning the complaint&#x27;s requested provider relief; root did not acquire the linked complaint or promote a report of requested relief into an order. The worker independently found the actual Tilak declaration; root&#x27;s web reader and one ordinary originalGET succeeded. Search and retained-record read only. No provider takedown record was recovered in this bounded lane; that is not proof no provider acted. The separate worker filings.md records the court-gateway limitation and Briver-record search. No further acquisition branch was opened before the forest review.</p>",
        "path": "sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09/provider-disclosure.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-tilak"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root provider lane closed. Tilak declaration, filed 13 June 2025 (see source references) republished by Ars Technica. Original custody and hash: tilak-capture.json. Retained PDF is 61 pages, 6,815,888 bytes, SHA256 bbd7cfa2059c35fd203ce7202b1bb6072d7bbfe6412ea061ffdf7aa58d2183a5.\n\n## Findings and locators\n\nThe sworn declaration supports a motion for alternative service on Sol Ecom, not a Briver compliance certification. Paragraphs18–23 report subpoenas and responsive contact records from Cloudflare, Namecheap and former registrar Name.com. Paragraph29 reports Google's June6,2025 production. Paragraphs24–30 describe subsequent notices and correspondence. These are counsel's sworn accounts; actual subpoena and production instruments are not attached in this read scope. They establish a reported disclosure route, not provider shutdown instructions.\n\nExhibit6 reproduces December2024–January2025 correspondence. A respondent associated by counsel with drawnudes.io claims eSafety requirements and compliance, including alleged January2025 legislation (PDF19,21). The respondent seeks written SF requirements and discusses territorial restrictions (PDF19,22). This is a respondent's account and offer, not independent verification of Australian law, successful compliance, eSafety approval, or regulator-to-regulator coordination. No specific technical restriction or issuing provider is demonstrated by that exchange.\n\nThe complete declaration and exhibit do not supply Briver's required report or a named provider's takedown command. The city-announced cooperation and this separate subpoena route must retain separate source ancestry.\n\n## Read scope\n\nRoot read the complete six-page declaration through the web reader, including the filed stamp, allegations about service attempts and signature, and complete Exhibit6 (PDF18–23) through retained extraction. Root visually checked PDF1,4,6,21,22. PDF21's visually underlined eSafety reference has no URI annotation on that page in the retained PDF. That is not a finding about external links everywhere in the bundle. All61 pages were extracted for search; corporate-registration/profile/site exhibits outside those twelve pages were not substantively reviewed, and no whole-bundle-read claim is made. Residential addresses, private contact identifiers and unrelated personal profile details are not reproduced here.\n\n## Bounded acquisition log\n\nRoot searched seven queries: `\"Briver\" \"registrar\"`; `\"Sol Ecom\" \"registry\"`; `site.sfcityattorney.org \"deepfake\" \"registrars\"`; `site.sf.gov \"deepfake\" \"registrars\"`; `\"San Francisco\" \"registries\" \"June 2, 2025\"`; `\"Chiu\" \"Briver\" \"cooperate\"`; `\"San Francisco\" \"registrars\" \"Namecheap\" deepfake`. Most results were unrelated, including different Briver entities. They were not identity evidence. The named-company query was a probe, not prior proof of involvement.\n\nThe complete main body of Ars Technica's16August2024 article was read. It supplies a lead concerning the complaint's requested provider relief; root did not acquire the linked complaint or promote a report of requested relief into an order. The worker independently found the actual Tilak declaration; root's web reader and one ordinary originalGET succeeded. Search and retained-record read only. No provider takedown record was recovered in this bounded lane; that is not proof no provider acted. The separate worker filings.md records the court-gateway limitation and Briver-record search. No further acquisition branch was opened before the forest review.\n",
        "file": "research/sf-compliance-wave-2026-09-09-provider-disclosure.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment",
        "title": "Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom",
        "description": "Read and captured 9 September 2026. The instrument is a stipulated final judgment against Briver LLC in a multi-defendant case, not a judgment against every website or every captioned defendant. Its court signature and filing stamp are visible. The operative obligations are much more specific than the city announcement, while actual payment and continuing co",
        "html": "<p>Read and captured 9 September 2026. <strong>The acquired instrument is a stipulated final judgment against Briver LLC in a multi-defendant case, not a judgment against every website or every captioned defendant.</strong> Its court signature and filing stamp are visible. The operative obligations are much more specific than the city announcement, while actual payment and continuing compliance remain unverified.</p>\n<p>Primary sources are the [City Attorney’s 2 June 2025 announcement](http[local research file] and a [copy of the signed judgment republished by Columbia Law School](http[local research file] The present SF.gov page contains no judgment attachment href in either its rendered anchors or retained structured body. The Columbia copy was discovered independently; it is not represented as a direct city or court download. The original PDF is image-only. All <strong>13 PDF pages</strong> were read visually from retained renders, including both counterpart signature pages and the service certificate.</p>\n<h2 id=\"identity-signature-and-legal-stage\">Identity, signature and legal stage</h2>\n<p>The case is <strong>People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237</strong>, San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and <strong>Briver LLC</strong> (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.</p>\n<p>PDF 1 bears a <strong>FILED May 30, 2025</strong> court stamp; the proposed designation is crossed out. <strong>PDF 12 / printed page 11</strong> bears Judge <strong>Ethan P. Schulman’s signature dated May 29, 2025</strong>. PDF 13 contains Deputy Clerk Edward Santos’s certificate of electronic service on <strong>May 30, 2025</strong> through File &amp; ServeXpress. Paragraph 19 says the court enters judgment in the People’s favor. Together these show a court-signed, filed final-judgment copy, rather than an unsigned proposed instrument. A separate register-of-actions entry was not acquired.</p>\n<p>The judge-signature date matters: <strong>¶6 defines the Effective Date as the date the court signs</strong>, so the visible operative reference date is <strong>29 May 2025</strong>. The city announcement says approval occurred on May 30; preserve that as the office’s wording and distinguish it from signature, filing and service. The two Briver representatives sign “on behalf of Briver”: <strong>Yuannan Cai, May 27, 2025</strong>, and <strong>Xiulu Yuan, May 26, 2025</strong> (PDF 12). The page does not identify their ownership percentages or corporate offices. PDF 11 has blank Briver and judge lines but contains the city counsel’s approved-as-form signature; PDF 12 is the signed counterpart. Paragraph 45 expressly allows counterpart signatures, so the blank lines on PDF 11 do not establish non-execution.</p>\n<p>The opening stipulation (PDF 2) states that no proof is taken and the judgment is not evidence of, or an admission concerning, alleged legal or factual issues; the stipulating parties waive appeal. Allegations and the negotiated obligations must remain distinct. Paragraphs 11–12 invoke <strong>Business and Professions Code 17200 et seq.</strong>; ¶13 preserves continuing jurisdiction under <strong>Code of Civil Procedure 664.6</strong>. The judgment predates AB 621’s enactment and is not evidence of application of its 2026 notice presumption.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-judgment-requires\">What the judgment requires</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Actor and action</th>\n<th>Operative scope and locator</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Briver: permanent operating prohibition</td>\n<td><strong>¶14, PDF 3:</strong> Briver must not own, operate, or aid and abet any website using AI models to convert clothed images of identifiable individuals into nude or sexually explicit images of those individuals. The clause has <strong>no express consent exception</strong>; retain this wording rather than silently narrowing it to the announcement’s NCII label. It concerns this specified image-transformation activity, not every AI service.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Briver: non-transfer and domain inactivity</td>\n<td><strong>¶15, PDF 3:</strong> for five years after effectiveness, Briver shall not transfer registration for the defined Briver Websites and must maintain registration in inactive hold/lock status so the domains do not resolve in DNS and are unavailable publicly. Read with ¶17(b)–(c) and ¶18, which require no transfer of website ownership and documentary evidence of continued registration to Briver or an affiliate. The clause prohibits transfer; a transfer recipient is not an unresolved term. The five-year period does not expressly terminate ¶14’s permanent prohibition.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Briver: investigation information</td>\n<td><strong>¶16, PDF 4:</strong> within 30 days of effectiveness, provide all relevant registered website names; information about the image-processing API and affiliate programme, its source, sharing websites and their operators; a summary and explanation of the underlying technology, including the model and any training data; and other known similar-site operators, particularly in California. These are disclosure obligations, not acquired disclosures.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Briver: recurring sworn proof</td>\n<td><strong>¶17–18, PDF 4–5:</strong> an authorized representative must attest under penalty of perjury within 14 days, and annually for five years, to the operating prohibition, non-transfer of website ownership and continued inactive registrations. Documentary evidence must accompany each attestation. If late, the People must notify Briver; there is a 14-day cure period after receipt before non-submission counts as a violation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>City Attorney: bounded inspection</td>\n<td><strong>¶24, PDF 6:</strong> on reasonable request, representatives may inspect Briver and affiliated persons’ or entities’ domain-registration and related records, solely to determine compliance with this judgment. This is not an unlimited general data-access entitlement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Court: enforcement and modification</td>\n<td><strong>¶26, PDF 6:</strong> a regularly noticed motion and hearing must precede the court’s finding of violation and additional civil penalties, reasonable enforcement/monitoring fees and costs, or further injunctive relief. <strong>¶37–38, PDF 8</strong>, preserve modification for materially inaccurate or intentionally false information on a motion supported by adequate proof, and continuing jurisdiction. <strong>¶43, PDF 9:</strong> modifications require a court order on noticed motion, or written party consent and court approval.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The definition of <strong>Briver</strong> in ¶1 includes specified successors, agents, representatives, employees, members, owners, managers, directors, officers and affiliated persons/entities before and after dissolution. The distinct joint-and-several clause <strong>¶25</strong> names Briver and associated persons/entities <strong>as of August 14, 2024</strong>. Those provisions should not be collapsed into a finding that all case defendants, all future affiliates, or all service providers were adjudged liable.</p>\n<p>The defined <strong>Briver Websites</strong> in ¶2 include the domain strings <code>porngen.art</code>, <code>undresser.ai</code> and <code>nudegenerator.ai</code>, plus further Briver websites identified under ¶16(a). Those are website identifiers, not separate legal defendants. They were not visited. The announcement’s reference to allegations involving two websites and its broader ten-site outcome use different counting frames.</p>\n<h2 id=\"money-and-preserved-claims\">Money and preserved claims</h2>\n<p><strong>¶19–23, PDF 5:</strong> the judgment imposes <strong>USD 100,000 in civil penalties</strong>. Briver must pay the City Attorney’s Office USD 50,000 within 30 days of effectiveness, then five USD 10,000 instalments dated <strong>July 1, August 1, September 1, October 1 and November 1, 2025</strong>, by wire under city instructions. The schedule totals USD 100,000; it does not prove receipt. Paragraph 22 provides acceleration upon failure to receive payment within one business day of a deadline, with ten-percent annual interest on unpaid balance. The packet does not establish that default occurred or calculate an actual accrued balance.</p>\n<p><strong>¶35, PDF 8:</strong> except as otherwise specified, the parties waive settlement-related fees and costs. Accordingly, the USD 100,000 is not described as a combined fees/penalty award. Enforcement fees and costs are a separate conditional remedy under ¶26. No payment receipt, satisfaction of judgment or consumer compensation payment was acquired.</p>\n<p><strong>¶28–30, PDF 6–7:</strong> the release is tied to the litigation and effective-date conduct. It does not release the excluded tax/criminal/later-conduct matters, and <strong>¶29 expressly preserves claims of individuals whose images were processed</strong>. The city’s settlement is not a release of those individuals’ private claims.</p>\n<h2 id=\"named-service-provider-duties-and-observed-outcome\">Named service-provider duties and observed outcome</h2>\n<p>The complete judgment names <strong>no independent registrar, registry, host, payment network, bank or authentication company as an actor ordered to terminate service</strong>. It directs Briver to disable and maintain its defined domains, provide information and prove compliance. File &amp; ServeXpress appears in the clerk’s service certificate as the document-service mechanism, not as a shutdown target or provider compelled to enforce a content policy.</p>\n<p>The <strong>announcement reports</strong> that, as of June 2, ten targeted websites were offline <strong>or no longer accessible in California</strong>, and that certain unnamed domain registrars and registries were willing to cooperate during the investigation. It attributes that combined result to the ongoing lawsuit and investigation. This is office-reported outcome evidence, not an independently tested ten-site availability audit, a judgment commanding ten providers, or proof of permanent worldwide disappearance. The signed judgment supplies a concrete coercive instrument for Briver; it does not disclose what each cooperating provider did or under which instruction.</p>\n<p>The strongest defensible synthesis is therefore an enforceable company-specific settlement, recurring disclosure/attestation and inspection rights, and a separately reported wider shutdown/cooperation outcome. The missing discriminator is the actual attestation and domain evidence, disclosure response, payment/satisfaction record, or provider-specific instruction and response. No targeted service was visited, no external submission or outreach occurred, and no further acquisition branch was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"dated-correction-9-september-2026\">Dated correction — 9 September 2026</h2>\n<p>Root and worker visually reread retained judgment-page-03.png, paragraph 15. The operative phrase is “shall not transfer the registration”. The earlier paraphrase reversed that prohibition and generated a nonexistent transfer-recipient gap. Both are withdrawn and the table now states the non-transfer duty. The original judgment PDF/hash is unchanged; this corrects our interpretation. Pre-correction note and candidate bytes are preserved under sf-integration-wave-2026-09-09/r25-before-domain-correction. The five-year inactivity/reporting distinction and the permanent paragraph 14 prohibition are unchanged.</p>",
        "path": "sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09/judgment.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-june-announcement",
          "w25-sf-s-briver-judgment"
        ],
        "markdown": "Read and captured 9 September 2026. **The acquired instrument is a stipulated final judgment against Briver LLC in a multi-defendant case, not a judgment against every website or every captioned defendant.** Its court signature and filing stamp are visible. The operative obligations are much more specific than the city announcement, while actual payment and continuing compliance remain unverified.\n\nPrimary sources are the City Attorney’s 2 June 2025 announcement (see source references) and a copy of the signed judgment republished by Columbia Law School (see source references) The present SF.gov page contains no judgment attachment href in either its rendered anchors or retained structured body. The Columbia copy was discovered independently; it is not represented as a direct city or court download. The original PDF is image-only. All **13 PDF pages** were read visually from retained renders, including both counterpart signature pages and the service certificate.\n\n## Identity, signature and legal stage\n\nThe case is **People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237**, San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and **Briver LLC** (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.\n\nPDF 1 bears a **FILED May 30, 2025** court stamp; the proposed designation is crossed out. **PDF 12 / printed page 11** bears Judge **Ethan P. Schulman’s signature dated May 29, 2025**. PDF 13 contains Deputy Clerk Edward Santos’s certificate of electronic service on **May 30, 2025** through File & ServeXpress. Paragraph 19 says the court enters judgment in the People’s favor. Together these show a court-signed, filed final-judgment copy, rather than an unsigned proposed instrument. A separate register-of-actions entry was not acquired.\n\nThe judge-signature date matters: **¶6 defines the Effective Date as the date the court signs**, so the visible operative reference date is **29 May 2025**. The city announcement says approval occurred on May 30; preserve that as the office’s wording and distinguish it from signature, filing and service. The two Briver representatives sign “on behalf of Briver”: **Yuannan Cai, May 27, 2025**, and **Xiulu Yuan, May 26, 2025** (PDF 12). The page does not identify their ownership percentages or corporate offices. PDF 11 has blank Briver and judge lines but contains the city counsel’s approved-as-form signature; PDF 12 is the signed counterpart. Paragraph 45 expressly allows counterpart signatures, so the blank lines on PDF 11 do not establish non-execution.\n\nThe opening stipulation (PDF 2) states that no proof is taken and the judgment is not evidence of, or an admission concerning, alleged legal or factual issues; the stipulating parties waive appeal. Allegations and the negotiated obligations must remain distinct. Paragraphs 11–12 invoke **Business and Professions Code 17200 et seq.**; ¶13 preserves continuing jurisdiction under **Code of Civil Procedure 664.6**. The judgment predates AB 621’s enactment and is not evidence of application of its 2026 notice presumption.\n\n## What the judgment requires\n\n| Actor and action | Operative scope and locator |\n| --- | --- |\n| Briver: permanent operating prohibition | **¶14, PDF 3:** Briver must not own, operate, or aid and abet any website using AI models to convert clothed images of identifiable individuals into nude or sexually explicit images of those individuals. The clause has **no express consent exception**; retain this wording rather than silently narrowing it to the announcement’s NCII label. It concerns this specified image-transformation activity, not every AI service. |\n| Briver: non-transfer and domain inactivity | **¶15, PDF 3:** for five years after effectiveness, Briver shall not transfer registration for the defined Briver Websites and must maintain registration in inactive hold/lock status so the domains do not resolve in DNS and are unavailable publicly. Read with ¶17(b)–(c) and ¶18, which require no transfer of website ownership and documentary evidence of continued registration to Briver or an affiliate. The clause prohibits transfer; a transfer recipient is not an unresolved term. The five-year period does not expressly terminate ¶14’s permanent prohibition. |\n| Briver: investigation information | **¶16, PDF 4:** within 30 days of effectiveness, provide all relevant registered website names; information about the image-processing API and affiliate programme, its source, sharing websites and their operators; a summary and explanation of the underlying technology, including the model and any training data; and other known similar-site operators, particularly in California. These are disclosure obligations, not acquired disclosures. |\n| Briver: recurring sworn proof | **¶17–18, PDF 4–5:** an authorized representative must attest under penalty of perjury within 14 days, and annually for five years, to the operating prohibition, non-transfer of website ownership and continued inactive registrations. Documentary evidence must accompany each attestation. If late, the People must notify Briver; there is a 14-day cure period after receipt before non-submission counts as a violation. |\n| City Attorney: bounded inspection | **¶24, PDF 6:** on reasonable request, representatives may inspect Briver and affiliated persons’ or entities’ domain-registration and related records, solely to determine compliance with this judgment. This is not an unlimited general data-access entitlement. |\n| Court: enforcement and modification | **¶26, PDF 6:** a regularly noticed motion and hearing must precede the court’s finding of violation and additional civil penalties, reasonable enforcement/monitoring fees and costs, or further injunctive relief. **¶37–38, PDF 8**, preserve modification for materially inaccurate or intentionally false information on a motion supported by adequate proof, and continuing jurisdiction. **¶43, PDF 9:** modifications require a court order on noticed motion, or written party consent and court approval. |\n\nThe definition of **Briver** in ¶1 includes specified successors, agents, representatives, employees, members, owners, managers, directors, officers and affiliated persons/entities before and after dissolution. The distinct joint-and-several clause **¶25** names Briver and associated persons/entities **as of August 14, 2024**. Those provisions should not be collapsed into a finding that all case defendants, all future affiliates, or all service providers were adjudged liable.\n\nThe defined **Briver Websites** in ¶2 include the domain strings `porngen.art`, `undresser.ai` and `nudegenerator.ai`, plus further Briver websites identified under ¶16(a). Those are website identifiers, not separate legal defendants. They were not visited. The announcement’s reference to allegations involving two websites and its broader ten-site outcome use different counting frames.\n\n## Money and preserved claims\n\n**¶19–23, PDF 5:** the judgment imposes **USD 100,000 in civil penalties**. Briver must pay the City Attorney’s Office USD 50,000 within 30 days of effectiveness, then five USD 10,000 instalments dated **July 1, August 1, September 1, October 1 and November 1, 2025**, by wire under city instructions. The schedule totals USD 100,000; it does not prove receipt. Paragraph 22 provides acceleration upon failure to receive payment within one business day of a deadline, with ten-percent annual interest on unpaid balance. The packet does not establish that default occurred or calculate an actual accrued balance.\n\n**¶35, PDF 8:** except as otherwise specified, the parties waive settlement-related fees and costs. Accordingly, the USD 100,000 is not described as a combined fees/penalty award. Enforcement fees and costs are a separate conditional remedy under ¶26. No payment receipt, satisfaction of judgment or consumer compensation payment was acquired.\n\n**¶28–30, PDF 6–7:** the release is tied to the litigation and effective-date conduct. It does not release the excluded tax/criminal/later-conduct matters, and **¶29 expressly preserves claims of individuals whose images were processed**. The city’s settlement is not a release of those individuals’ private claims.\n\n## Named service-provider duties and observed outcome\n\nThe complete judgment names **no independent registrar, registry, host, payment network, bank or authentication company as an actor ordered to terminate service**. It directs Briver to disable and maintain its defined domains, provide information and prove compliance. File & ServeXpress appears in the clerk’s service certificate as the document-service mechanism, not as a shutdown target or provider compelled to enforce a content policy.\n\nThe **announcement reports** that, as of June 2, ten targeted websites were offline **or no longer accessible in California**, and that certain unnamed domain registrars and registries were willing to cooperate during the investigation. It attributes that combined result to the ongoing lawsuit and investigation. This is office-reported outcome evidence, not an independently tested ten-site availability audit, a judgment commanding ten providers, or proof of permanent worldwide disappearance. The signed judgment supplies a concrete coercive instrument for Briver; it does not disclose what each cooperating provider did or under which instruction.\n\nThe strongest defensible synthesis is therefore an enforceable company-specific settlement, recurring disclosure/attestation and inspection rights, and a separately reported wider shutdown/cooperation outcome. The missing discriminator is the actual attestation and domain evidence, disclosure response, payment/satisfaction record, or provider-specific instruction and response. No targeted service was visited, no external submission or outreach occurred, and no further acquisition branch was opened.\n\n## Dated correction — 9 September 2026\n\nRoot and worker visually reread retained judgment-page-03.png, paragraph 15. The operative phrase is “shall not transfer the registration”. The earlier paraphrase reversed that prohibition and generated a nonexistent transfer-recipient gap. Both are withdrawn and the table now states the non-transfer duty. The original judgment PDF/hash is unchanged; this corrects our interpretation. Pre-correction note and candidate bytes are preserved under sf-integration-wave-2026-09-09/r25-before-domain-correction. The five-year inactivity/reporting distinction and the permanent paragraph 14 prohibition are unchanged.\n",
        "file": "research/sf-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-judgment.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery",
        "title": "San Francisco notices: the original remains a specific gap",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root stopped original-notice recovery after the planned credible alternative: ordinary GET of the current official news page and inspection of its server-rendered publication data. Statutory reading and independent notice-comparison are the remaining lanes of this bounded run.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root stopped original-notice recovery after the planned credible alternative: ordinary GET of the current official news page and inspection of its server-rendered publication data. Statutory reading and independent notice-comparison are the remaining lanes of this bounded run.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-was-actually-read\">What was actually read</h2>\n<p>The [San Francisco Chronicle report](http[local research file] dated17July2026, says the July16 notices cite the47-AG warning as earlier notice. It describes confidential app attachments unavailable to the newspaper, a28-day response request and threatened civil enforcement. This is a reported document connection; root has not acquired those notices or attachments. Root read complete article body121-179, with title/date. The newspaper supplies no original-notice download in the inspected links.</p>\n<p>[WIRED&#x27;s report](http[local research file] publishes named spokesperson statements: Google says five identified apps were suspended; Apple says three were removed, developer termination was in progress and four others were required to address violations. These are company accounts to a reporter, not independently observed removals, dated transaction logs or proof of payment disconnection. They are tied to the later San Francisco intervention, not replies to NAAG. Root read the full substantive body65-89 and update time; notice originals were not linked.</p>\n<p>[TechCrunch](http[local research file] also publishes company responses; its update records comments added17July. This is an interview record, not a public counsel-to-city reply. Root read110-123 and followed its WIRED link. Conflicting comment-availability statements across articles may reflect publication/update times; no substantive contradiction is inferred merely from one outlet initially lacking comment.</p>\n<p>No user uploaded images, violating app use, account access or source contact was involved. Specific apps were not sought. Reported download/revenue estimates and the researchers&#x27; underlying measurements were not accepted or newly investigated.</p>\n<h2 id=\"official-publication-recovery-and-its-limit\">Official-publication recovery and its limit</h2>\n<p>The official current news page http[local research file] returned200 through one ordinary GET after the prior lane&#x27;s web reader returned only a sparse page. Retained official-news.html has244,772bytes and SHA256 d71369491cf1bc11e71ba2cf720113df8e4414203b684176aba09d6403d3fe47. The page&#x27;s publicly delivered <strong>NEXT_DATA</strong> contains100 news entries out of a stated252, dated26August2026 through4December2024. Root inspected the structure, searched titles/metadata for Apple/Google/deepfake/nudify and examined dated entries bracketing July2026. No target notice appeared in that delivered subset. This is not a complete site, attachment repository or office-record search.</p>\n<p>The subset includes a June2025 website-enforcement announcement, a distinct earlier case not opened. Its existence is a lead, not evidence about the July2026 platform notices. Three targeted web queries for dated Chiu letters, the official media domain and the current official domain did not yield an acquired original. Broad results were largely unrelated; no claim of exhaustive result reading is made. Prior eighteen-query response searches were not repeated.</p>\n<p>The public page exposes its backing read API URL, but no further endpoint or private document enumeration was attempted. This run stops recovery here as planned. Missing records are the actual notices, confidential service-specific attachments, proof of delivery, replies and resulting directions. Their absence from the inspected news subset does not mean the office withheld, censored or never published them.</p>\n<h2 id=\"why-the-statutory-lane-matters-independently\">Why the statutory lane matters independently</h2>\n<p>Root read the complete current [California Civil Code1708.86](http[local research file] body56-186. Subdivision(c)(2) supplies a specific route: sufficient evidence from a depicted person or public prosecutor, identifying an enabling service relationship, plus failure to take necessary cessation steps within30days of receipt, with a court-extension provision. The service definition is primary-purpose based. The provision creates a presumption; it does not make a press release a judgment. The28-day reported demand must remain separate from this statutory30-day condition. Detailed elements, exceptions, remedies and enactment source are in statutory-mechanism.md; independent comparison with the earlier general letter is in notice-bridge-review.md.</p>\n<p>The evidence now supports separate levels: current statutory design; earlier collective demand; later notices and company responses as attributed reporting; actual merchant/payment outcomes still unverified. No graph edge should silently collapse those levels. Public research/local construction remain authorized; requests for nonpublic correspondence would require further authority.</p>",
        "path": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09/notice-recovery.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-chronicle",
          "w25-sf-s-wired",
          "w25-sf-s-official-news"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root stopped original-notice recovery after the planned credible alternative: ordinary GET of the current official news page and inspection of its server-rendered publication data. Statutory reading and independent notice-comparison are the remaining lanes of this bounded run.\n\n## What was actually read\n\nThe San Francisco Chronicle report (see source references) dated17July2026, says the July16 notices cite the47-AG warning as earlier notice. It describes confidential app attachments unavailable to the newspaper, a28-day response request and threatened civil enforcement. This is a reported document connection; root has not acquired those notices or attachments. Root read complete article body121-179, with title/date. The newspaper supplies no original-notice download in the inspected links.\n\nWIRED's report (see source references) publishes named spokesperson statements: Google says five identified apps were suspended; Apple says three were removed, developer termination was in progress and four others were required to address violations. These are company accounts to a reporter, not independently observed removals, dated transaction logs or proof of payment disconnection. They are tied to the later San Francisco intervention, not replies to NAAG. Root read the full substantive body65-89 and update time; notice originals were not linked.\n\nTechCrunch (see source references) also publishes company responses; its update records comments added17July. This is an interview record, not a public counsel-to-city reply. Root read110-123 and followed its WIRED link. Conflicting comment-availability statements across articles may reflect publication/update times; no substantive contradiction is inferred merely from one outlet initially lacking comment.\n\nNo user uploaded images, violating app use, account access or source contact was involved. Specific apps were not sought. Reported download/revenue estimates and the researchers' underlying measurements were not accepted or newly investigated.\n\n## Official-publication recovery and its limit\n\nThe official current news page http[local research file] returned200 through one ordinary GET after the prior lane's web reader returned only a sparse page. Retained official-news.html has244,772bytes and SHA256 d71369491cf1bc11e71ba2cf720113df8e4414203b684176aba09d6403d3fe47. The page's publicly delivered **NEXT_DATA** contains100 news entries out of a stated252, dated26August2026 through4December2024. Root inspected the structure, searched titles/metadata for Apple/Google/deepfake/nudify and examined dated entries bracketing July2026. No target notice appeared in that delivered subset. This is not a complete site, attachment repository or office-record search.\n\nThe subset includes a June2025 website-enforcement announcement, a distinct earlier case not opened. Its existence is a lead, not evidence about the July2026 platform notices. Three targeted web queries for dated Chiu letters, the official media domain and the current official domain did not yield an acquired original. Broad results were largely unrelated; no claim of exhaustive result reading is made. Prior eighteen-query response searches were not repeated.\n\nThe public page exposes its backing read API URL, but no further endpoint or private document enumeration was attempted. This run stops recovery here as planned. Missing records are the actual notices, confidential service-specific attachments, proof of delivery, replies and resulting directions. Their absence from the inspected news subset does not mean the office withheld, censored or never published them.\n\n## Why the statutory lane matters independently\n\nRoot read the complete current California Civil Code1708.86 (see source references) body56-186. Subdivision(c)(2) supplies a specific route: sufficient evidence from a depicted person or public prosecutor, identifying an enabling service relationship, plus failure to take necessary cessation steps within30days of receipt, with a court-extension provision. The service definition is primary-purpose based. The provision creates a presumption; it does not make a press release a judgment. The28-day reported demand must remain separate from this statutory30-day condition. Detailed elements, exceptions, remedies and enactment source are in statutory-mechanism.md; independent comparison with the earlier general letter is in notice-bridge-review.md.\n\nThe evidence now supports separate levels: current statutory design; earlier collective demand; later notices and company responses as attributed reporting; actual merchant/payment outcomes still unverified. No graph edge should silently collapse those levels. Public research/local construction remain authorized; requests for nonpublic correspondence would require further authority.\n",
        "file": "research/sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-notice-recovery.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism",
        "title": "California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route",
        "description": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. The independent statutory lane read the complete official current Civil Code section and chaptered bill. No San Francisco letter was read in this lane; the conclusions below identify the instrument and its conditions, not whether a particular notice establishes them.",
        "html": "<p>Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. The independent statutory lane read the complete official current Civil Code section and chaptered bill. No San Francisco letter was read in this lane; the conclusions below identify the instrument and its conditions, not whether a particular notice establishes them.</p>\n<p>AB 621 became Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025, approved and filed on <strong>13 October 2025</strong>. It amended Civil Code <strong>1708.86</strong>, whose current official footer gives <strong>1 January 2026</strong> as its effective date. The official history and current section independently establish the identity; the suggested CalMatters path was not used as evidence. AB 621 section 2 says its provisions clarifying that a deepfake pornography service is subject to section 1708.86 are declaratory of existing law. That limited declaration should not be expanded into a claim that every new facilitation or notice provision previously existed. [Chaptered bill](http[local research file] [official history](http[local research file] [current Civil Code 1708.86](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The substantive rule is <strong>1708.86(b)(3)</strong>: knowing facilitation or reckless aiding or abetting of the creation/disclosure conduct prohibited by (b)(1)–(2). The separate <strong>(c)(2)</strong> route creates a conditional presumption of violating that rule. It is not a free-standing administrative removal order, an automatic judgment, or a universal 30-day immunity period for conduct otherwise satisfying (b)(3).</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Stage</th>\n<th>Exact statutory condition or consequence</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Covered service and underlying conduct</td>\n<td>Under (a)(3), a website, mobile application or other service must have creation of digitized sexually explicit material as its <strong>primary purpose</strong>. The definition does not itself say its primary purpose must be nonconsensual creation. For the third-party presumption, (c)(2)(A)(i) additionally requires evidence of a service that engages in conduct violating this section. Definitions (a)(4), (6)–(9) concern a depicted natural person and realistic digitization; this is not a blanket designation of every AI service or all pornography.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Qualified sender and sufficient evidence</td>\n<td>A depicted individual or a public prosecutor supplies evidence sufficient to demonstrate that the recipient provides services enabling the ongoing operation of the violating deepfake pornography service: (c)(2)(A)(i). A general policy objection or the sender’s official title alone does not establish these predicates.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Delivery and required particulars</td>\n<td>Under (c)(2)(A)(ii), the sender must use a customer-service email or other designated process <strong>if prominently displayed</strong> on the recipient’s website. The evidence must name the deepfake service, generally describe the enabling services, and give sender contact information. Recipient use of that contact information is restricted to seeking additional report information necessary for the required steps. The three particulars do not replace the sufficient-evidence requirement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Recipient’s clock</td>\n<td>Under (c)(2)(B)(i), the presumption attaches if the recipient fails to take all necessary steps to stop providing the enabling services <strong>within 30 days of receiving that evidence</strong>. This is receipt-based, not automatically measured from a press release, posting or letter date. The text says days, not business days.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Extension and enforcement</td>\n<td>A <strong>court</strong> may extend the 30-day period where additional time is needed for an ongoing law-enforcement investigation or operation: (c)(2)(B)(ii). Public prosecutors may bring a civil enforcement action under (f)(2). A notice does not itself adjudicate evidentiary sufficiency, violation, exemptions or penalties.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>All table locators refer to the [official current section](http[local research file] Its service-enabling language does not expressly name Apple, Google, app stores, payment networks or banks. Applying it to one of those actors requires the relevant factual connection; the statutory text alone supplies no contract or service-specific finding.</p>\n<p>The statute’s exact formulation is a <strong>presumption of violation</strong>, not merely a presumption that the recipient has read a complaint. Paragraph (c)(1) separately presumes an owner/operator/controller’s knowledge of nonconsent unless express written consent is produced. Paragraph (c)(2) does not set out a separate administrative rebuttal or appeal procedure. Evidence Code 601 distinguishes conclusive and rebuttable presumptions, and two kinds of rebuttable burden; that general text does not by itself establish which burden this particular presumption affects. This packet therefore records the conditional presumption and ordinary civil-action route without claiming to have resolved its detailed litigation treatment or controlling case law. [Evidence Code 601](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Under <strong>(a)(14)</strong>, public prosecutors include the Attorney General, city attorneys, county counsel, district attorneys and other city/county prosecutors. A prevailing public prosecutor may receive injunctive/equitable relief, <strong>USD 25,000 per violation</strong>, or <strong>USD 50,000 for a malicious violation</strong>, reasonable attorney’s fees and other appropriate court relief; proof of actual harm to a depicted individual is unnecessary: <strong>(f)(2)</strong>. These are litigation remedies, not amounts automatically assessed when the 30 days expire. A harmed depicted individual has a different remedy menu under <strong>(f)(1)</strong>, including an alternative statutory award of USD 1,500–50,000 for the unauthorized acts concerning any one work, potentially up to USD 250,000 for malice. Do not merge those private damages with the prosecutor’s per-violation penalties. The action limitation is three years from actual or reasonably diligent discovery: <strong>(g)</strong>.</p>\n<p>Material limits remain. Subdivision <strong>(d)</strong> excludes specified law-enforcement, legal-proceeding, public-concern, news/political and constitutionally protected circumstances; public-figure status alone does not make material newsworthy. Subdivision <strong>(i)</strong> excludes federally protected conduct, expressly including section 230 protection. Subdivision <strong>(j)</strong> protects an ISP’s mere transmission, routing or provision of access to third-party content, and preserves the referenced state net-neutrality requirements. Conversely, the disclaimers described in <strong>(e)</strong> are not defenses. These provisions prevent a blanket reading while leaving application to particular services and conduct unresolved.</p>\n<p>The next discriminator belongs to the notice lane: the actual named service, enabling-service allegation, supporting evidence, designated delivery channel, receipt date, any court extension, recipient response and any adjudication. An older generalized letter cannot automatically satisfy the current presumption’s specific predicates. The present packet stops before that application and before legislative-origins research.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-reading-scope\">Custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p>Direct ordinary GETs successfully retained the official current section, chaptered bill and history HTML. Full operative text was read through the official reader and checked against retained HTML; capture is not a claim that every navigation/script byte was interpreted. Exact metadata and failures are in statutory-captures.json. Current-code HTML SHA-256: <code>319afffe89143fb923e1bc5de56f727d3da6d80e0b4d47ecd51af04d7a3867fb</code>. Chaptered-bill HTML: <code>9c3f9f8bd1019fd5c941781001d3bc2083745a3c09c4546768172c6e3d91d3e8</code>. History HTML: <code>4467ecb0b50d8942d1bcc9366f3015f524f38d4ef8767f844839bf0ca42ea40a</code>.</p>\n<p>The analysis index was inspected. Its observed 10 September 2025 Assembly Floor Analysis download form returned HTTP 500 on one ordinary submission; that route was closed without retry and the analysis was not used as substantive evidence. This was a server response, not an administrative access-policy refusal or automatic sandbox approval rejection. No original analysis PDF or statutory bill PDF is claimed. No outreach, canonical case edit or other-law research branch occurred.</p>",
        "path": "sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09/statutory-mechanism.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w25-sf-s-code",
          "w25-sf-s-chapter"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. The independent statutory lane read the complete official current Civil Code section and chaptered bill. No San Francisco letter was read in this lane; the conclusions below identify the instrument and its conditions, not whether a particular notice establishes them.\n\nAB 621 became Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025, approved and filed on **13 October 2025**. It amended Civil Code **1708.86**, whose current official footer gives **1 January 2026** as its effective date. The official history and current section independently establish the identity; the suggested CalMatters path was not used as evidence. AB 621 section 2 says its provisions clarifying that a deepfake pornography service is subject to section 1708.86 are declaratory of existing law. That limited declaration should not be expanded into a claim that every new facilitation or notice provision previously existed. Chaptered bill (see source references) official history (see source references) current Civil Code 1708.86 (see source references)\n\nThe substantive rule is **1708.86(b)(3)**: knowing facilitation or reckless aiding or abetting of the creation/disclosure conduct prohibited by (b)(1)–(2). The separate **(c)(2)** route creates a conditional presumption of violating that rule. It is not a free-standing administrative removal order, an automatic judgment, or a universal 30-day immunity period for conduct otherwise satisfying (b)(3).\n\n| Stage | Exact statutory condition or consequence |\n| --- | --- |\n| Covered service and underlying conduct | Under (a)(3), a website, mobile application or other service must have creation of digitized sexually explicit material as its **primary purpose**. The definition does not itself say its primary purpose must be nonconsensual creation. For the third-party presumption, (c)(2)(A)(i) additionally requires evidence of a service that engages in conduct violating this section. Definitions (a)(4), (6)–(9) concern a depicted natural person and realistic digitization; this is not a blanket designation of every AI service or all pornography. |\n| Qualified sender and sufficient evidence | A depicted individual or a public prosecutor supplies evidence sufficient to demonstrate that the recipient provides services enabling the ongoing operation of the violating deepfake pornography service: (c)(2)(A)(i). A general policy objection or the sender’s official title alone does not establish these predicates. |\n| Delivery and required particulars | Under (c)(2)(A)(ii), the sender must use a customer-service email or other designated process **if prominently displayed** on the recipient’s website. The evidence must name the deepfake service, generally describe the enabling services, and give sender contact information. Recipient use of that contact information is restricted to seeking additional report information necessary for the required steps. The three particulars do not replace the sufficient-evidence requirement. |\n| Recipient’s clock | Under (c)(2)(B)(i), the presumption attaches if the recipient fails to take all necessary steps to stop providing the enabling services **within 30 days of receiving that evidence**. This is receipt-based, not automatically measured from a press release, posting or letter date. The text says days, not business days. |\n| Extension and enforcement | A **court** may extend the 30-day period where additional time is needed for an ongoing law-enforcement investigation or operation: (c)(2)(B)(ii). Public prosecutors may bring a civil enforcement action under (f)(2). A notice does not itself adjudicate evidentiary sufficiency, violation, exemptions or penalties. |\n\nAll table locators refer to the official current section (see source references) Its service-enabling language does not expressly name Apple, Google, app stores, payment networks or banks. Applying it to one of those actors requires the relevant factual connection; the statutory text alone supplies no contract or service-specific finding.\n\nThe statute’s exact formulation is a **presumption of violation**, not merely a presumption that the recipient has read a complaint. Paragraph (c)(1) separately presumes an owner/operator/controller’s knowledge of nonconsent unless express written consent is produced. Paragraph (c)(2) does not set out a separate administrative rebuttal or appeal procedure. Evidence Code 601 distinguishes conclusive and rebuttable presumptions, and two kinds of rebuttable burden; that general text does not by itself establish which burden this particular presumption affects. This packet therefore records the conditional presumption and ordinary civil-action route without claiming to have resolved its detailed litigation treatment or controlling case law. Evidence Code 601 (see source references)\n\nUnder **(a)(14)**, public prosecutors include the Attorney General, city attorneys, county counsel, district attorneys and other city/county prosecutors. A prevailing public prosecutor may receive injunctive/equitable relief, **USD 25,000 per violation**, or **USD 50,000 for a malicious violation**, reasonable attorney’s fees and other appropriate court relief; proof of actual harm to a depicted individual is unnecessary: **(f)(2)**. These are litigation remedies, not amounts automatically assessed when the 30 days expire. A harmed depicted individual has a different remedy menu under **(f)(1)**, including an alternative statutory award of USD 1,500–50,000 for the unauthorized acts concerning any one work, potentially up to USD 250,000 for malice. Do not merge those private damages with the prosecutor’s per-violation penalties. The action limitation is three years from actual or reasonably diligent discovery: **(g)**.\n\nMaterial limits remain. Subdivision **(d)** excludes specified law-enforcement, legal-proceeding, public-concern, news/political and constitutionally protected circumstances; public-figure status alone does not make material newsworthy. Subdivision **(i)** excludes federally protected conduct, expressly including section 230 protection. Subdivision **(j)** protects an ISP’s mere transmission, routing or provision of access to third-party content, and preserves the referenced state net-neutrality requirements. Conversely, the disclaimers described in **(e)** are not defenses. These provisions prevent a blanket reading while leaving application to particular services and conduct unresolved.\n\nThe next discriminator belongs to the notice lane: the actual named service, enabling-service allegation, supporting evidence, designated delivery channel, receipt date, any court extension, recipient response and any adjudication. An older generalized letter cannot automatically satisfy the current presumption’s specific predicates. The present packet stops before that application and before legislative-origins research.\n\n## Custody and reading scope\n\nDirect ordinary GETs successfully retained the official current section, chaptered bill and history HTML. Full operative text was read through the official reader and checked against retained HTML; capture is not a claim that every navigation/script byte was interpreted. Exact metadata and failures are in statutory-captures.json. Current-code HTML SHA-256: `319afffe89143fb923e1bc5de56f727d3da6d80e0b4d47ecd51af04d7a3867fb`. Chaptered-bill HTML: `9c3f9f8bd1019fd5c941781001d3bc2083745a3c09c4546768172c6e3d91d3e8`. History HTML: `4467ecb0b50d8942d1bcc9366f3015f524f38d4ef8767f844839bf0ca42ea40a`.\n\nThe analysis index was inspected. Its observed 10 September 2025 Assembly Floor Analysis download form returned HTTP 500 on one ordinary submission; that route was closed without retry and the analysis was not used as substantive evidence. This was a server response, not an administrative access-policy refusal or automatic sandbox approval rejection. No original analysis PDF or statutory bill PDF is claimed. No outreach, canonical case edit or other-law research branch occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09-statutory-mechanism.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol",
        "title": "Correction is supported in the client; reversal of consequences remains unverified",
        "description": "Bounded public-code investigation,9 September2026. Acquisition stopped after six Python source files and repository metadata. This is static inspection of Meta's public reference client at commit 73a742c45c35d711e94c8bf92254df1a2d9c9f01; no package was installed, no code was run, no authentication was used and no private signal API was queried. Lantern's use",
        "html": "<p>Bounded public-code investigation,9 September2026. Acquisition stopped after six Python source files and repository metadata. This is static inspection of Meta&#x27;s public reference client at commit 73a742c45c35d711e94c8bf92254df1a2d9c9f01; no package was installed, no code was run, no authentication was used and no private signal API was queried. Lantern&#x27;s use of Meta&#x27;s hosted ThreatExchange does not establish that any participant deploys this particular client or commit.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-inspected-code-establishes\">What the inspected code establishes</h2>\n<p>The [update wrapper](http[local research file] recognizes deletion markers. Its file-store implementation removes the matching local entry when applying such an update (lines396–413). Thus the inspected implementation provides a path for removing a previously fetched record, rather than treating received signals as intrinsically permanent.</p>\n<p>Its checkpoint documentation describes a90-day history for deletion records and an85-day stale threshold (lines218–253). That refers to change-history availability, not Lantern&#x27;s retention period for underlying signals, personal data or financial records. The hosted API&#x27;s present retention behaviour was not independently tested. The code also guards against applying a stale incremental update.</p>\n<p>The [current API adapter](http[local research file] applies the85-day threshold and maps a deletion marker to an absent record in its delta. It preserves contributor-specific opinions: explicit classifications and selected reactions can produce positive, negative or investigation-seed categories (lines105–180). These generic software categories are not Lantern&#x27;s legal findings or proof that a receiving company uses a particular threshold.</p>\n<p>The <a>fetch command</a>.</p>\n<p>The [opinion model](http[local research file] distinguishes negative assessments, investigation leads and positive classifications. Its aggregator can represent conflicting categories as disputed (lines129–171). That capability does not establish that an interface displays the dispute to every investigator, that it suppresses action, or that an earlier account decision is reconsidered.</p>\n<p>The [API wrapper](http[local research file] requests updated data including deletion/status fields and exposes reactions (lines271–308,443–520). Nothing was submitted through those methods. Their existence is evidence of the published client interface, not an observed production transaction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"meaning-for-this-investigation\">Meaning for this investigation</h2>\n<p>The record now argues against describing the signal exchange as technically incapable of correction. It leaves three separate questions: whether programme obligations require the relevant update path; whether recipients actually process updates correctly and promptly; and whether a corrected signal triggers review of an already completed content, account or payment decision.</p>\n<p>A local dataset refresh is not itself an account restoration. The inspected code addresses fetched signal state and opinions. It supplies no evidence of Lantern-specific reversal of Cash App closures, Xbox restrictions or any Steam action. This is a boundary on the current evidence, not a repository-wide claim that no related software could implement restoration.</p>\n<p>The2024 Lantern report&#x27;s appeal/removal/TechCoalition-notification requirement remains the programme-level starting point. The next discriminating artifact is an integration contract or anonymized operational trace connecting a correction identifier to recipient acknowledgement, refreshed data, case reopening and disposition. A trace that ends at data deletion would leave the consequential remedy question unresolved.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-scope\">Custody and scope</h2>\n<p>captures.json records exact public URLs, commit, bytes and SHA256 for repository-main-ref.json, the complete nontruncated repository-tree.json and six source files. Retained source is not equivalent to full-file review. Root read targeted portions of threat_updates.py1–75,218–343,380–413; fb_threatexchange_api.py1–180,199–217,260–405; api.py271–308,443–520; fetch_cmd.py168–257; fetch_state.py29–51,55–181,271–276. descriptor.py was captured and search-inspected, not substantively reviewed. The tree was used to locate files, not treated as proof of their behaviour. Independent static review is recorded separately when returned.</p>\n<p>The Meta deletion documentation and an initially discovered GitHub issue page failed in the web reader. No mirror was used to establish their contents. The ordinary public GitHub repository/API and pinned raw source provided the useful substitute. No repeated attempt, private-access request or live ThreatExchange query occurred. A discovered issue title was not used as evidence of a deployed Lantern defect.</p>",
        "path": "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09/correction-protocol.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "Bounded public-code investigation,9 September2026. Acquisition stopped after six Python source files and repository metadata. This is static inspection of Meta's public reference client at commit 73a742c45c35d711e94c8bf92254df1a2d9c9f01; no package was installed, no code was run, no authentication was used and no private signal API was queried. Lantern's use of Meta's hosted ThreatExchange does not establish that any participant deploys this particular client or commit.\n\n## What the inspected code establishes\n\nThe update wrapper (see source references) recognizes deletion markers. Its file-store implementation removes the matching local entry when applying such an update (lines396–413). Thus the inspected implementation provides a path for removing a previously fetched record, rather than treating received signals as intrinsically permanent.\n\nIts checkpoint documentation describes a90-day history for deletion records and an85-day stale threshold (lines218–253). That refers to change-history availability, not Lantern's retention period for underlying signals, personal data or financial records. The hosted API's present retention behaviour was not independently tested. The code also guards against applying a stale incremental update.\n\nThe current API adapter (see source references) applies the85-day threshold and maps a deletion marker to an absent record in its delta. It preserves contributor-specific opinions: explicit classifications and selected reactions can produce positive, negative or investigation-seed categories (lines105–180). These generic software categories are not Lantern's legal findings or proof that a receiving company uses a particular threshold.\n\nThe fetch command.\n\nThe opinion model (see source references) distinguishes negative assessments, investigation leads and positive classifications. Its aggregator can represent conflicting categories as disputed (lines129–171). That capability does not establish that an interface displays the dispute to every investigator, that it suppresses action, or that an earlier account decision is reconsidered.\n\nThe API wrapper (see source references) requests updated data including deletion/status fields and exposes reactions (lines271–308,443–520). Nothing was submitted through those methods. Their existence is evidence of the published client interface, not an observed production transaction.\n\n## Meaning for this investigation\n\nThe record now argues against describing the signal exchange as technically incapable of correction. It leaves three separate questions: whether programme obligations require the relevant update path; whether recipients actually process updates correctly and promptly; and whether a corrected signal triggers review of an already completed content, account or payment decision.\n\nA local dataset refresh is not itself an account restoration. The inspected code addresses fetched signal state and opinions. It supplies no evidence of Lantern-specific reversal of Cash App closures, Xbox restrictions or any Steam action. This is a boundary on the current evidence, not a repository-wide claim that no related software could implement restoration.\n\nThe2024 Lantern report's appeal/removal/TechCoalition-notification requirement remains the programme-level starting point. The next discriminating artifact is an integration contract or anonymized operational trace connecting a correction identifier to recipient acknowledgement, refreshed data, case reopening and disposition. A trace that ends at data deletion would leave the consequential remedy question unresolved.\n\n## Custody and scope\n\ncaptures.json records exact public URLs, commit, bytes and SHA256 for repository-main-ref.json, the complete nontruncated repository-tree.json and six source files. Retained source is not equivalent to full-file review. Root read targeted portions of threat_updates.py1–75,218–343,380–413; fb_threatexchange_api.py1–180,199–217,260–405; api.py271–308,443–520; fetch_cmd.py168–257; fetch_state.py29–51,55–181,271–276. descriptor.py was captured and search-inspected, not substantively reviewed. The tree was used to locate files, not treated as proof of their behaviour. Independent static review is recorded separately when returned.\n\nThe Meta deletion documentation and an initially discovered GitHub issue page failed in the web reader. No mirror was used to establish their contents. The ordinary public GitHub repository/API and pinned raw source provided the useful substitute. No repeated attempt, private-access request or live ThreatExchange query occurred. A discovered issue title was not used as evidence of a deployed Lantern defect.\n",
        "file": "research/signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-protocol-independent-review",
        "title": "Independent technical review: public ThreatExchange update client",
        "description": "Reviewed 9 September 2026. Static inspection only: no captured module was imported or executed, no API or credentials were used, and no new source was acquired. All six Python source hashes match captures.json at pinned commit 73a742c45c35d711e94c8bf92254df1a2d9c9f01. This review concerns available software paths, not Lantern's deployment or the live server.",
        "html": "<p>Reviewed 9 September 2026. Static inspection only: no captured module was imported or executed, no API or credentials were used, and no new source was acquired. All six retained Python source hashes match captures.json at pinned commit 73a742c45c35d711e94c8bf92254df1a2d9c9f01. This review concerns available software paths, not Lantern&#x27;s deployment or the live server.</p>\n<p>The proposed narrow conclusion is supported: the public client contains paths for processing deletion/update records and representing negative opinions. ThreatUpdateJSON.should_delete calls a record a tombstone and treats either should_delete or the absence of descriptors as a removal condition. ThreatUpdateFileStore._apply_updates_impl removes the key from its local state for such records, otherwise replaces/adds the record, and serializes the result. The wrapper&#x27;s apply_updates invokes that implementation for a nonempty delta. This is a concrete local-state deletion path in the source, not a record of any deletion actually delivered to a Lantern participant. See [threat_updates.py lines45-49](http[local research file] lines316-333 and396-413.</p>\n<p>The exchange adapter separately maps a tombstone to None, NON_MALICIOUS to a negative category, and a DISAGREE_WITH_TAGS reaction to an implicit negative category under its precedence rules. It retains the resulting opinions in the indicator record. An explicit opinion from the same owner takes precedence over the implicit reaction; these routines do not promise to retain every contradictory statement unchanged. A negative category is metadata, not proof of a false accusation, a successful appeal or account restoration. The adapter fetches threat_updates and emits a delta keyed by threat type and indicator. See [fb_threatexchange_api.py lines105-180](http[local research file] and292-325; fetch_state.py lines79-117 define opinion categories.</p>\n<p>The 90-day statement is documentation of deletion-history retention in client comments/docstrings. It is not a verified observation of current backend retention, and especially not Lantern&#x27;s signal-retention policy. Both checkpoint variants use a strict older-than-85-days threshold, providing a five-day margin against the documented loss of deletion records. The relevant age is the stored last_fetch_time, not each signal&#x27;s creation date. See threat_updates.py lines218-253 and [fb_threatexchange_api.py lines55-73](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The CLI call chain is present to the storage interface: execute_for_collab obtains a checkpoint through _verify_store_and_checkpoint; if stale, the latter calls store.clear(collab) and returns None. execute_for_collab then passes that None into the exchange adapter&#x27;s fetch_iter, which requests updates without a starting checkpoint, and merges returned deltas into the store. Thus the code requests clearing and begins a fresh fetch path; do not claim that this review observed a complete successful refetch. The command can encounter failures or limits. See [fetch_cmd.py lines184-257](http[local research file] fb_threatexchange_api.py lines292-325 and api.py lines271-308.</p>\n<p>A concrete call-path limit remains: the captured fetch_state.py defines abstract merge, flush and clear methods, and the concrete configured CLI storage implementation is not among these six files. The earlier ThreatUpdateFileStore deletion routine and the exchange-adapter/CLI path must not be spliced into one claimed execution trace. This does not erase the demonstrated source-level deletion capability; it limits any statement that the precise deployed CLI persistence path has been independently traced end to end. No broader bug hunt or execution is needed for this inquiry&#x27;s conclusion.</p>\n<p>The missing causal links remain deployment and downstream obligations: whether a particular Lantern participant runs this client/version, ingests the updates promptly, propagates changes to its own exported copies and enforcement systems, or reopens a prior decision. Public client capability cannot establish those facts. The supported refinement is that a public technical mechanism for updates, deletion markers and negative opinions exists; its availability does not demonstrate Lantern-wide correction or remedy performance.</p>\n<p>Inspected scope: threat_updates.py selected lines30-62,195-265,270-413; fb_threatexchange_api.py40-217,265-368; fetch_cmd.py95-295; fetch_state.py1-135,185-280; api.py271-308; descriptor.py scoped status/deletion matches only. Source paths and byte hashes remain in captures.json. No package, case or acquisition record was changed.</p>",
        "path": "signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09/protocol-independent-review.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "Reviewed 9 September 2026. Static inspection only: no captured module was imported or executed, no API or credentials were used, and no new source was acquired. All six retained Python source hashes match captures.json at pinned commit 73a742c45c35d711e94c8bf92254df1a2d9c9f01. This review concerns available software paths, not Lantern's deployment or the live server.\n\nThe proposed narrow conclusion is supported: the public client contains paths for processing deletion/update records and representing negative opinions. ThreatUpdateJSON.should_delete calls a record a tombstone and treats either should_delete or the absence of descriptors as a removal condition. ThreatUpdateFileStore._apply_updates_impl removes the key from its local state for such records, otherwise replaces/adds the record, and serializes the result. The wrapper's apply_updates invokes that implementation for a nonempty delta. This is a concrete local-state deletion path in the source, not a record of any deletion actually delivered to a Lantern participant. See threat_updates.py lines45-49 (see source references) lines316-333 and396-413.\n\nThe exchange adapter separately maps a tombstone to None, NON_MALICIOUS to a negative category, and a DISAGREE_WITH_TAGS reaction to an implicit negative category under its precedence rules. It retains the resulting opinions in the indicator record. An explicit opinion from the same owner takes precedence over the implicit reaction; these routines do not promise to retain every contradictory statement unchanged. A negative category is metadata, not proof of a false accusation, a successful appeal or account restoration. The adapter fetches threat_updates and emits a delta keyed by threat type and indicator. See fb_threatexchange_api.py lines105-180 (see source references) and292-325; fetch_state.py lines79-117 define opinion categories.\n\nThe 90-day statement is documentation of deletion-history retention in client comments/docstrings. It is not a verified observation of current backend retention, and especially not Lantern's signal-retention policy. Both checkpoint variants use a strict older-than-85-days threshold, providing a five-day margin against the documented loss of deletion records. The relevant age is the stored last_fetch_time, not each signal's creation date. See threat_updates.py lines218-253 and fb_threatexchange_api.py lines55-73 (see source references)\n\nThe CLI call chain is present to the storage interface: execute_for_collab obtains a checkpoint through _verify_store_and_checkpoint; if stale, the latter calls store.clear(collab) and returns None. execute_for_collab then passes that None into the exchange adapter's fetch_iter, which requests updates without a starting checkpoint, and merges returned deltas into the store. Thus the code requests clearing and begins a fresh fetch path; do not claim that this review observed a complete successful refetch. The command can encounter failures or limits. See fetch_cmd.py lines184-257 (see source references) fb_threatexchange_api.py lines292-325 and api.py lines271-308.\n\nA concrete call-path limit remains: the captured fetch_state.py defines abstract merge, flush and clear methods, and the concrete configured CLI storage implementation is not among these six files. The earlier ThreatUpdateFileStore deletion routine and the exchange-adapter/CLI path must not be spliced into one claimed execution trace. This does not erase the demonstrated source-level deletion capability; it limits any statement that the precise deployed CLI persistence path has been independently traced end to end. No broader bug hunt or execution is needed for this inquiry's conclusion.\n\nThe missing causal links remain deployment and downstream obligations: whether a particular Lantern participant runs this client/version, ingests the updates promptly, propagates changes to its own exported copies and enforcement systems, or reopens a prior decision. Public client capability cannot establish those facts. The supported refinement is that a public technical mechanism for updates, deletion markers and negative opinions exists; its availability does not demonstrate Lantern-wide correction or remedy performance.\n\nInspected scope: threat_updates.py selected lines30-62,195-265,270-413; fb_threatexchange_api.py40-217,265-368; fetch_cmd.py95-295; fetch_state.py1-135,185-280; api.py271-308; descriptor.py scoped status/deletion matches only. Source paths and byte hashes remain in captures.json. No package, case or acquisition record was changed.\n",
        "file": "research/signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-protocol-independent-review.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine",
        "title": "Checkstep / Sightengine: classification, enforcement and reuse are separate interfaces",
        "description": "Bounded public-record packet, 9 September 2026. Six core records, including the existing government-published review. No customer data, accounts or moderation APIs were accessed. These are published specifications and standard terms, not proof of a particular customer's configuration, signed contract or enforcement history.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded public-record packet, 9 September 2026. Six core records, including the existing government-published review. No customer data, accounts or moderation APIs were accessed. These are published specifications and standard terms, not proof of a particular customer&#x27;s configuration, signed contract or enforcement history.</p>\n<h2 id=\"result\">Result</h2>\n<p>PUBLIC&#x27;s example is documented as an integration of moderation vendors. The observed path is a customer submitting content for analysis, Sightengine returning classification scores, Checkstep applying the customer&#x27;s configured policy, and a decision event returning to that customer&#x27;s platform. The records do not establish a shared list of restricted people or automatic propagation of one platform&#x27;s ban to another.</p>\n<p>The distinction does not make the interface inconsequential: it can carry instructions that remove content or suspend an account. It also does not establish zero reuse. The published contracts contain two different machine-learning permissions: Checkstep&#x27;s customer-data permission with an opt-out, and Sightengine&#x27;s voluntary feedback-data route with a separate controller role and retention exception. Permission and actual use remain separate evidence states.</p>\n<h2 id=\"six-decisive-records\">Six decisive records</h2>\n<p><strong>1. PUBLIC&#x27;s framing and its source.</strong> The [Data Landscape Review 2024–2025](http[local research file] §6.1.1 / Case study 4, describes this as signal sharing that lets a moderation provider use classification outputs without acquiring another provider&#x27;s proprietary datasets. Footnote 35 points directly to Sightengine&#x27;s coauthored guide, labelled 2025. This is the report&#x27;s characterization of the vendor example, rather than an independently observed exchange or a cross-platform enforcement agreement. Its phrase about no transfer of raw data must not be expanded into a claim that no submitted content is processed outside the customer&#x27;s platform.</p>\n<p><strong>2. The coauthored interface account.</strong> [Sightengine, Ultimate Guide to GenAI Moderation—Part 2](http[local research file] “Detecting and moderating…” §§1.1, 1.3, 2.1–2.2, describes media submitted by URL or upload with selected models. Results include AI-generation/deepfake scores between 0 and 1. Sightengine recommends thresholds; users choose how scores map to their policies. Checkstep integrates those outputs, supports multiple scanning providers, and routes possible violations to automated decisions or human review. It returns results and enforcement decisions to the customer. The guide also describes appeals and community reports. Its privacy language about reference-based integration describes an architecture; it is not a sufficient basis for a universal no-storage claim. The current page displays “Guide, 2026” while its introduction anticipates 2025; the report cites it as 2025. No exact original publication date or historical version identity is established here.</p>\n<p><strong>3. Checkstep&#x27;s actual integration specification.</strong> [Standard Integration](http[local research file] “Sending contents,” “Access delegation” and “Receiving Webhooks,” accepts content IDs, text or media references, author identifiers and optional metadata. Delegated access enables content analysis and display to moderators; examples include cloud-storage reads and streaming bytes. Returned data identifies content, policy, severity and confidence. <code>analysed-content</code> supports provisional withholding while a decision is pending. A <code>decision</code> event instructs the customer&#x27;s integration to take down, restore or keep content down after an appeal. Human <code>author-decision</code> events can suspend/terminate an account, optionally remove its content, or restore it. The customer must implement the webhook handler for the decision to affect its platform. Thus Sightengine&#x27;s score is not itself a takedown, but the configured Checkstep workflow can produce an actionable instruction. <code>incident-closed</code> reports appeal outcomes. These are documented capabilities, with no observed customer configuration or successful appeal in this run.</p>\n<p><strong>4. Checkstep&#x27;s reuse, responsibility and retention terms.</strong> [Checkstep Terms of Service](http[local research file] definitions and §§5.1–5.5, 13.3(C), 14, retain customer ownership while permitting use of Customer Data for machine learning that develops service features. Section 5.5 treats this as a customer instruction and offers an email opt-out; the read clause does not state an anonymization condition or prove pooled training across customers. The terms contemplate archives/backups. On termination they require disposal of data held, subject to a backup-delivery request made within 30 days and legal retention; 30 days is the request window, not a universal deletion deadline. Section 14 identifies the contracting party as controller and Checkstep as processor, generally processing under agreed instructions. Subprocessors require protective contracts and notification with a five-working-day objection window. Data-subject requests are referred to the contracting party. These published terms do not establish which provider/terms a specific customer accepted or whether it opted out.</p>\n<p><strong>5. Sightengine&#x27;s subscriber agreement.</strong> [Terms of Service](http[local research file] §§1, 3.5–3.6, 4.1–4.6, 9.1–9.3, identifies the operator as Kozelo SAS. Routine Subscriber Data is licensed for service provision and instructed interoperability. Section 9.3 first grants perpetual, irrevocable use permission for general suggestions/corrections. Its separate nonexclusive licence covers voluntary raw-media submissions, with or without labels, through the Feedback API or similar mechanism for model development, testing and training; the subscriber warrants the necessary rights and consents. The raw-media licence must not inherit the first sentence’s adjectives merely by proximity. This is not proof that normal scanning automatically supplies training media, or that Checkstep sends its customers&#x27; data into this route. Sightengine can also send service-compliance notices and suspend its subscriber&#x27;s API access. That power concerns the provider/customer service relationship and must not be confused with direct control of an end user&#x27;s account on an unrelated platform.</p>\n<p><strong>6. Sightengine&#x27;s feedback exception and correction route.</strong> [Data Processing Addendum](http[local research file] PDF 2 / definition, PDF 3–4 / §§2.1–2.3 and PDF 6–7 / §§4–5, normally assigns Sightengine a processor role; a subscriber that is itself a processor must have the controller&#x27;s authority. For voluntarily submitted Feedback Data, §2.3 instead makes Sightengine an independent controller, subject to privacy law and an appropriate lawful basis. Ordinary deletion instructions are to be completed as soon as reasonably practicable, within 90 days subject to legal retention; expiry provisions also describe a recovery period of up to 30 days. Section 4.4 exempts Feedback Data from those automatic return/deletion provisions and permits perpetual retention subject to its privacy policy and applicable law. Section 5 enables access, correction, restriction, export and assistance with data-subject requests, normally through the subscriber. This is not a finding that privacy rights disappear or that every correction propagates into a trained model.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-means-for-the-sharing-hypothesis\">What this means for the sharing hypothesis</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Interface</th>\n<th>What can travel</th>\n<th>What this packet does not establish</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Customer → Checkstep → selected scanner</td>\n<td>Content/reference access, selected model inputs and identifiers needed for that customer&#x27;s moderation</td>\n<td>An exchange of the scanner&#x27;s proprietary training corpus</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sightengine → Checkstep</td>\n<td>Detection scores/classification results for submitted media</td>\n<td>A decision binding every other platform or a shared offender identity</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Checkstep → customer platform</td>\n<td>Policy-linked content/account decisions, provisional results and appeal outcomes</td>\n<td>A deployed handler, its actual settings, enforcement against a particular user, or an independent appeal body</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Customer data / voluntary feedback → model development</td>\n<td>Published permissions for two distinct reuse routes</td>\n<td>Whether a customer used either route, whether learning is pooled, the actual training corpus or a resulting cross-customer restriction</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The strongest rival to a cross-platform restriction interpretation is ordinary service composition: one vendor supplies classifiers and another supplies policy/workflow software for each customer&#x27;s site. The explicit contract permissions leave a narrower cross-customer learning possibility open, but that is not the same mechanism as transmitting a ban or restriction signal. Affected people can face automated consequences even where formal policy choice remains with the customer; the discriminating evidence is the configured rule and its execution, not the mere presence of a classifier.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-version-boundaries\">Custody and version boundaries</h2>\n<p>Original captures and SHA256 values are recorded in <code>cs-captures.json</code>. <code>cs-standard.html</code>, <code>cs-sightengine-guide.html</code>, <code>cs-checkstep-terms.html</code>, <code>cs-sightengine-terms.html</code> and <code>cs-sightengine-dpa.pdf</code> were acquired by ordinary HTTP 200 requests on 9 September 2026. The report uses the existing <code>../osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09/data-landscape-2025.html</code>. Derived text copies support precise reading; <code>cs-sightengine-dpa-extract.txt</code> preserves the inspected PDF pages. Source states are read, with targeted scopes in the manifest; no statement claims every annex was audited.</p>\n<p>The DPA&#x27;s actual redirect target was <code>http[local research file]</code>; SHA256 <code>4d67f249fce7d29c2d6e60bc1af43f9935a61d566131276c1ba03827214a1e7b</code>. The filename identifies a 20260407 version cue. Its legally defined effective date depends on acceptance; the file name is not evidence of the Checkstep integration&#x27;s historical terms. Current contractual clauses must not be backdated into PUBLIC&#x27;s 2025 case study.</p>\n<p>The auxiliary [Sightengine AI-video documentation](http[local research file] “Moderation result” and FAQ score/threshold sections, was read through the web reader; original bytes were not retained. The public Checkstep home and Sightengine FAQ pages served link discovery. They do not support an additional ownership, customer or deployment claim. No private dashboard, gated guide submission, customer content or test API request was used. No failed access route required a retry.</p>\n<h2 id=\"forest-implication-and-next-discriminator\">Forest implication and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>This example weakens the claim that every programme labelled signal sharing creates a cross-platform restriction system. It strengthens a more specific mechanism: policy choices become machine-readable workflows that can carry real content/account consequences, while contractual reuse can turn some moderation inputs or feedback into model-development resources.</p>\n<p>Reopen on a public customer-specific integration/SOW, settings export or redacted decision-and-appeal audit that identifies the scanner, score thresholds, policy mapping, action handler and correction outcome. For the reuse question, the needed records are a customer opt-out/feedback configuration, the applicable controller/subprocessor terms and a documented training-use pathway. No outreach is authorized or proposed in this packet. Acquisition stops here for the forest review; no graph edits were made.</p>",
        "path": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09/checkstep-sightengine.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-standard",
          "w22-sig-s-guide-current",
          "w22-sig-s-sightengine-terms",
          "w22-sig-s-sightengine-dpa",
          "w22-sig-s-checkstep-terms",
          "w22-sig-s-guide-cited2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded public-record packet, 9 September 2026. Six core records, including the existing government-published review. No customer data, accounts or moderation APIs were accessed. These are published specifications and standard terms, not proof of a particular customer's configuration, signed contract or enforcement history.\n\n## Result\n\nPUBLIC's example is documented as an integration of moderation vendors. The observed path is a customer submitting content for analysis, Sightengine returning classification scores, Checkstep applying the customer's configured policy, and a decision event returning to that customer's platform. The records do not establish a shared list of restricted people or automatic propagation of one platform's ban to another.\n\nThe distinction does not make the interface inconsequential: it can carry instructions that remove content or suspend an account. It also does not establish zero reuse. The published contracts contain two different machine-learning permissions: Checkstep's customer-data permission with an opt-out, and Sightengine's voluntary feedback-data route with a separate controller role and retention exception. Permission and actual use remain separate evidence states.\n\n## Six decisive records\n\n**1. PUBLIC's framing and its source.** The Data Landscape Review 2024–2025 (see source references) §6.1.1 / Case study 4, describes this as signal sharing that lets a moderation provider use classification outputs without acquiring another provider's proprietary datasets. Footnote 35 points directly to Sightengine's coauthored guide, labelled 2025. This is the report's characterization of the vendor example, rather than an independently observed exchange or a cross-platform enforcement agreement. Its phrase about no transfer of raw data must not be expanded into a claim that no submitted content is processed outside the customer's platform.\n\n**2. The coauthored interface account.** Sightengine, Ultimate Guide to GenAI Moderation—Part 2 (see source references) “Detecting and moderating…” §§1.1, 1.3, 2.1–2.2, describes media submitted by URL or upload with selected models. Results include AI-generation/deepfake scores between 0 and 1. Sightengine recommends thresholds; users choose how scores map to their policies. Checkstep integrates those outputs, supports multiple scanning providers, and routes possible violations to automated decisions or human review. It returns results and enforcement decisions to the customer. The guide also describes appeals and community reports. Its privacy language about reference-based integration describes an architecture; it is not a sufficient basis for a universal no-storage claim. The current page displays “Guide, 2026” while its introduction anticipates 2025; the report cites it as 2025. No exact original publication date or historical version identity is established here.\n\n**3. Checkstep's actual integration specification.** Standard Integration (see source references) “Sending contents,” “Access delegation” and “Receiving Webhooks,” accepts content IDs, text or media references, author identifiers and optional metadata. Delegated access enables content analysis and display to moderators; examples include cloud-storage reads and streaming bytes. Returned data identifies content, policy, severity and confidence. `analysed-content` supports provisional withholding while a decision is pending. A `decision` event instructs the customer's integration to take down, restore or keep content down after an appeal. Human `author-decision` events can suspend/terminate an account, optionally remove its content, or restore it. The customer must implement the webhook handler for the decision to affect its platform. Thus Sightengine's score is not itself a takedown, but the configured Checkstep workflow can produce an actionable instruction. `incident-closed` reports appeal outcomes. These are documented capabilities, with no observed customer configuration or successful appeal in this run.\n\n**4. Checkstep's reuse, responsibility and retention terms.** Checkstep Terms of Service (see source references) definitions and §§5.1–5.5, 13.3(C), 14, retain customer ownership while permitting use of Customer Data for machine learning that develops service features. Section 5.5 treats this as a customer instruction and offers an email opt-out; the read clause does not state an anonymization condition or prove pooled training across customers. The terms contemplate archives/backups. On termination they require disposal of data held, subject to a backup-delivery request made within 30 days and legal retention; 30 days is the request window, not a universal deletion deadline. Section 14 identifies the contracting party as controller and Checkstep as processor, generally processing under agreed instructions. Subprocessors require protective contracts and notification with a five-working-day objection window. Data-subject requests are referred to the contracting party. These published terms do not establish which provider/terms a specific customer accepted or whether it opted out.\n\n**5. Sightengine's subscriber agreement.** Terms of Service (see source references) §§1, 3.5–3.6, 4.1–4.6, 9.1–9.3, identifies the operator as Kozelo SAS. Routine Subscriber Data is licensed for service provision and instructed interoperability. Section 9.3 first grants perpetual, irrevocable use permission for general suggestions/corrections. Its separate nonexclusive licence covers voluntary raw-media submissions, with or without labels, through the Feedback API or similar mechanism for model development, testing and training; the subscriber warrants the necessary rights and consents. The raw-media licence must not inherit the first sentence’s adjectives merely by proximity. This is not proof that normal scanning automatically supplies training media, or that Checkstep sends its customers' data into this route. Sightengine can also send service-compliance notices and suspend its subscriber's API access. That power concerns the provider/customer service relationship and must not be confused with direct control of an end user's account on an unrelated platform.\n\n**6. Sightengine's feedback exception and correction route.** Data Processing Addendum (see source references) PDF 2 / definition, PDF 3–4 / §§2.1–2.3 and PDF 6–7 / §§4–5, normally assigns Sightengine a processor role; a subscriber that is itself a processor must have the controller's authority. For voluntarily submitted Feedback Data, §2.3 instead makes Sightengine an independent controller, subject to privacy law and an appropriate lawful basis. Ordinary deletion instructions are to be completed as soon as reasonably practicable, within 90 days subject to legal retention; expiry provisions also describe a recovery period of up to 30 days. Section 4.4 exempts Feedback Data from those automatic return/deletion provisions and permits perpetual retention subject to its privacy policy and applicable law. Section 5 enables access, correction, restriction, export and assistance with data-subject requests, normally through the subscriber. This is not a finding that privacy rights disappear or that every correction propagates into a trained model.\n\n## What this means for the sharing hypothesis\n\n| Interface | What can travel | What this packet does not establish |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Customer → Checkstep → selected scanner | Content/reference access, selected model inputs and identifiers needed for that customer's moderation | An exchange of the scanner's proprietary training corpus |\n| Sightengine → Checkstep | Detection scores/classification results for submitted media | A decision binding every other platform or a shared offender identity |\n| Checkstep → customer platform | Policy-linked content/account decisions, provisional results and appeal outcomes | A deployed handler, its actual settings, enforcement against a particular user, or an independent appeal body |\n| Customer data / voluntary feedback → model development | Published permissions for two distinct reuse routes | Whether a customer used either route, whether learning is pooled, the actual training corpus or a resulting cross-customer restriction |\n\nThe strongest rival to a cross-platform restriction interpretation is ordinary service composition: one vendor supplies classifiers and another supplies policy/workflow software for each customer's site. The explicit contract permissions leave a narrower cross-customer learning possibility open, but that is not the same mechanism as transmitting a ban or restriction signal. Affected people can face automated consequences even where formal policy choice remains with the customer; the discriminating evidence is the configured rule and its execution, not the mere presence of a classifier.\n\n## Custody and version boundaries\n\nOriginal captures and SHA256 values are recorded in `cs-captures.json`. `cs-standard.html`, `cs-sightengine-guide.html`, `cs-checkstep-terms.html`, `cs-sightengine-terms.html` and `cs-sightengine-dpa.pdf` were acquired by ordinary HTTP 200 requests on 9 September 2026. The report uses the existing `../osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09/data-landscape-2025.html`. Derived text copies support precise reading; `cs-sightengine-dpa-extract.txt` preserves the inspected PDF pages. Source states are read, with targeted scopes in the manifest; no statement claims every annex was audited.\n\nThe DPA's actual redirect target was `http[local research file]`; SHA256 `4d67f249fce7d29c2d6e60bc1af43f9935a61d566131276c1ba03827214a1e7b`. The filename identifies a 20260407 version cue. Its legally defined effective date depends on acceptance; the file name is not evidence of the Checkstep integration's historical terms. Current contractual clauses must not be backdated into PUBLIC's 2025 case study.\n\nThe auxiliary Sightengine AI-video documentation (see source references) “Moderation result” and FAQ score/threshold sections, was read through the web reader; original bytes were not retained. The public Checkstep home and Sightengine FAQ pages served link discovery. They do not support an additional ownership, customer or deployment claim. No private dashboard, gated guide submission, customer content or test API request was used. No failed access route required a retry.\n\n## Forest implication and next discriminator\n\nThis example weakens the claim that every programme labelled signal sharing creates a cross-platform restriction system. It strengthens a more specific mechanism: policy choices become machine-readable workflows that can carry real content/account consequences, while contractual reuse can turn some moderation inputs or feedback into model-development resources.\n\nReopen on a public customer-specific integration/SOW, settings export or redacted decision-and-appeal audit that identifies the scanner, score thresholds, policy mapping, action handler and correction outcome. For the reuse question, the needed records are a customer opt-out/feedback configuration, the applicable controller/subprocessor terms and a documented training-use pathway. No outreach is authorized or proposed in this packet. Acquisition stops here for the forest review; no graph edits were made.\n",
        "file": "research/signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-checkstep-sightengine.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review",
        "title": "Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance",
        "description": "Research checked 9 September 2026. Root acquisition stopped after the scoped reads below. This packet distinguishes an assessment, an operator's response, current programme reporting and actual case records. No access to private signals was attempted.",
        "html": "<p>Research checked 9 September 2026. Root acquisition stopped after the scoped reads below. This packet distinguishes an assessment, an operator&#x27;s response, current programme reporting and actual case records. No access to private signals was attempted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-commissioned-assessment\">The commissioned assessment</h2>\n<p>[BSR&#x27;s November 2023 HRIA](http[local research file] PDF19–20, describes a multiparty agreement and Tech Coalition admission, compliance and removal powers. Participants must review signals and establish their own policy violation; they must provide appeals. These are described commitments, not an inspected executed agreement.</p>\n<p>BSR warns that decontextualized or erroneous signals can produce cumulative exclusions, requiring separate appeals to each company (PDF25–30). It identifies resource and legal-pressure risks that can undermine review, and dependence on Meta&#x27;s infrastructure. These are assessed risks, not proven wrongful cases. Its April–August 2023 work predates later financial integration. The report disclaims audit/certification status.</p>\n<p>The assessment therefore supplies a testable distinction: distributed decisions can share an evidential input while remedies remain fragmented. The actual quality of investigation and correction propagation remains unresolved.</p>\n<p>Access: primary web reader succeeded (63 pages); one ordinary PDF GET returned403. No original PDF retained; do not retry this closed route. Read disclaimer/executive portions PDF2–9, methodology/stakeholder sections PDF14–18, programme/governance PDF19–30, and commitments/recommendations PDF46–50. Remaining pages were not fully read. Reader page excerpts were inspected; this is not full-document substantive review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-operators-response\">The operator&#x27;s response</h2>\n<p>The [7 November 2023 response](http[local research file] says nine of nineteen recommendations had been implemented and ten were being pursued or investigated. It describes retention limits, signal-quality review, participation management and planned transparency. Independent audits or trusted researcher access were still possibilities to explore. This is an implementation claim by the commissioning operator, not independent verification of performance.</p>\n<p>The main article was read completely. Retained HTML: lantern-hria-response.html,115875 bytes,SHA2564933c787d9a3ff987e4e521e1aaadda5b1a2b3ec512172b9745928b8746b1262. Original acquisition metadata is in root-hria-captures.json.</p>\n<h2 id=\"current-published-operational-boundary\">Current published operational boundary</h2>\n<p>Root independently read PDF8–11,14,28–29 of the [2025 transparency report](http[local research file] retained by Hubble. Its case study starts with a law-enforcement request to Meta, followed by Meta&#x27;s investigation and signals, then Cash App closures and Xbox action. This does not equate to government database membership or direct government uploads.</p>\n<p>The report describes commissioned BSR reviews of financial participation and AI-related signals, but not their full findings. It states companies may delete only signals they uploaded, and gives aggregate removals without reasons that separate error correction from retention expiry. Own-policy review is required; shared taxonomy can cover conduct prohibited by platform rules without establishing illegality. The listed cross-platform tags include Steam; a tag is not proof of Steam participation or a particular Steam sanction.</p>\n<p>Original: lantern-report2025.pdf,836595 bytes,SHA256f6667366d192a4582ab5d6e6ea2115a1772ca3312229a4e48bdc18b68d21bc5d. Hubble&#x27;s lantern.md carries broader report scope and numerical discrepancies. Do not treat both readings as independent evidentiary origins.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-next-record-should-decide\">What the next record should decide</h2>\n<p>The [2024 report](http[local research file] PDF14, supplies a partial remedy requirement: companies must maintain appeals/recourse, remove signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notify Tech Coalition. Root subsequently read that original page. This establishes a stated removal/notification obligation; the public paragraph does not specify notification to every earlier recipient or reopening its decisions.</p>\n<p>The high-value missing artifact is a correction and appeal propagation protocol, with an anonymized worked example: when the originating company retracts a signal, who receives notice, whether downstream investigations are reopened, what happens to already-exported data, and whether affected users learn that several decisions share one source.</p>\n<p>The current annual totals cannot answer that question. They neither establish a wrongful exclusion nor demonstrate successful end-to-end remedy. A second useful discriminator is the financial-sector HRIA with its recommendation disposition and actual financial onboarding terms.</p>\n<p>Scoped searches: BSR Lantern financial-pilot human-rights review; Tech Coalition Lantern appeals2025; Tech Coalition Lantern financial human-rights. These located a public pilot summary and older/current transparency material, but not the complete later HRIA or an identified public correction case. The [17 July 2025 pilot summary](http[local research file] offers its full report to members/participants through a member resource centre. That access boundary is not authority to enter it; the public summary was read. No outreach or restricted-access acquisition occurred.</p>\n<p>Interpretation to carry into the forest: admission and taxonomy authority, infrastructure provision, signal origination, downstream enforcement and remedy are five separate functions. A network may distribute exclusions without one actor issuing each final instruction. To claim that it has done so wrongly requires the actual signal-to-decision-to-correction evidence.</p>",
        "path": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09/lantern-rights-review.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-bsr2023",
          "w22-sig-s-hria-response"
        ],
        "markdown": "Research checked 9 September 2026. Root acquisition stopped after the scoped reads below. This packet distinguishes an assessment, an operator's response, current programme reporting and actual case records. No access to private signals was attempted.\n\n## The commissioned assessment\n\nBSR's November 2023 HRIA (see source references) PDF19–20, describes a multiparty agreement and Tech Coalition admission, compliance and removal powers. Participants must review signals and establish their own policy violation; they must provide appeals. These are described commitments, not an inspected executed agreement.\n\nBSR warns that decontextualized or erroneous signals can produce cumulative exclusions, requiring separate appeals to each company (PDF25–30). It identifies resource and legal-pressure risks that can undermine review, and dependence on Meta's infrastructure. These are assessed risks, not proven wrongful cases. Its April–August 2023 work predates later financial integration. The report disclaims audit/certification status.\n\nThe assessment therefore supplies a testable distinction: distributed decisions can share an evidential input while remedies remain fragmented. The actual quality of investigation and correction propagation remains unresolved.\n\nAccess: primary web reader succeeded (63 pages); one ordinary PDF GET returned403. No original PDF retained; do not retry this closed route. Read disclaimer/executive portions PDF2–9, methodology/stakeholder sections PDF14–18, programme/governance PDF19–30, and commitments/recommendations PDF46–50. Remaining pages were not fully read. Reader page excerpts were inspected; this is not full-document substantive review.\n\n## The operator's response\n\nThe 7 November 2023 response (see source references) says nine of nineteen recommendations had been implemented and ten were being pursued or investigated. It describes retention limits, signal-quality review, participation management and planned transparency. Independent audits or trusted researcher access were still possibilities to explore. This is an implementation claim by the commissioning operator, not independent verification of performance.\n\nThe main article was read completely. Retained HTML: lantern-hria-response.html,115875 bytes,SHA2564933c787d9a3ff987e4e521e1aaadda5b1a2b3ec512172b9745928b8746b1262. Original acquisition metadata is in root-hria-captures.json.\n\n## Current published operational boundary\n\nRoot independently read PDF8–11,14,28–29 of the 2025 transparency report (see source references) retained by Hubble. Its case study starts with a law-enforcement request to Meta, followed by Meta's investigation and signals, then Cash App closures and Xbox action. This does not equate to government database membership or direct government uploads.\n\nThe report describes commissioned BSR reviews of financial participation and AI-related signals, but not their full findings. It states companies may delete only signals they uploaded, and gives aggregate removals without reasons that separate error correction from retention expiry. Own-policy review is required; shared taxonomy can cover conduct prohibited by platform rules without establishing illegality. The listed cross-platform tags include Steam; a tag is not proof of Steam participation or a particular Steam sanction.\n\nOriginal: lantern-report2025.pdf,836595 bytes,SHA256f6667366d192a4582ab5d6e6ea2115a1772ca3312229a4e48bdc18b68d21bc5d. Hubble's lantern.md carries broader report scope and numerical discrepancies. Do not treat both readings as independent evidentiary origins.\n\n## What the next record should decide\n\nThe 2024 report (see source references) PDF14, supplies a partial remedy requirement: companies must maintain appeals/recourse, remove signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notify Tech Coalition. Root subsequently read that original page. This establishes a stated removal/notification obligation; the public paragraph does not specify notification to every earlier recipient or reopening its decisions.\n\nThe high-value missing artifact is a correction and appeal propagation protocol, with an anonymized worked example: when the originating company retracts a signal, who receives notice, whether downstream investigations are reopened, what happens to already-exported data, and whether affected users learn that several decisions share one source.\n\nThe current annual totals cannot answer that question. They neither establish a wrongful exclusion nor demonstrate successful end-to-end remedy. A second useful discriminator is the financial-sector HRIA with its recommendation disposition and actual financial onboarding terms.\n\nScoped searches: BSR Lantern financial-pilot human-rights review; Tech Coalition Lantern appeals2025; Tech Coalition Lantern financial human-rights. These located a public pilot summary and older/current transparency material, but not the complete later HRIA or an identified public correction case. The 17 July 2025 pilot summary (see source references) offers its full report to members/participants through a member resource centre. That access boundary is not authority to enter it; the public summary was read. No outreach or restricted-access acquisition occurred.\n\nInterpretation to carry into the forest: admission and taxonomy authority, infrastructure provision, signal origination, downstream enforcement and remedy are five separate functions. A network may distribute exclusions without one actor issuing each final instruction. To claim that it has done so wrongly requires the actual signal-to-decision-to-correction evidence.\n",
        "file": "research/signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern",
        "title": "Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions",
        "description": "Bounded primary-source pass, observed 9 September 2026. This is Tech Coalition's child-safety programme, not a similarly named political vendor. No canonical case changes. Acquisition stopped at this operational-record breakpoint; rights and remedy analysis is separately recorded in lantern-rights-review.md(lantern-rights-review.md).",
        "html": "<p>Bounded primary-source pass, observed 9 September 2026. This is Tech Coalition&#x27;s child-safety programme, not a similarly named political vendor. No canonical case changes. Acquisition stopped at this operational-record breakpoint; rights and remedy analysis is separately recorded in <a href=\"/research/signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review\">lantern-rights-review.md</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding-and-limits\">Finding and limits</h2>\n<p>Lantern provides a documented mechanism through which one company&#x27;s child-safety investigation can inform another company&#x27;s account or financial-service decision. The operator reports a case involving 18 Cash App account closures and action on Xbox accounts. Block separately confirms that its investigations team uses Lantern signals. These are meaningful programme and participant accounts of operational use, but the specific closures, arrests, accuracy and counterfactual effect have not been independently established in this pass. The public material allocates admission and programme standards to Tech Coalition, hosting to Meta, signal selection and labelling to originating companies, and subsequent investigations and enforcement to receiving companies. It does not establish a single actor directing every resulting decision.</p>\n<h2 id=\"money-infrastructure-and-admission\">Money, infrastructure and admission</h2>\n<p>The 2024 transparency report states that participation has no cost, that Tech Coalition and its members fully fund the programme, and that Meta provides technical hosting in kind. Eligible non-members can apply. This supports organizational funding and an in-kind infrastructure relationship; it does not show a monetary budget, participant-by-participant payment, restricted award, or donor approval right. The current programme and membership pages are institutional descriptions rather than financial ledgers. Their funding statements do not establish the legal entity making each payment. [2024 report, PDF 4](http[local research file] [programme page](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Tech Coalition administers applications and compliance review. The 2024 report describes a formal legal agreement between participants after acceptance; it also describes more granular requirements for properly staffed teams able to investigate and act responsibly. Tech Coalition maintains the Official Program Expectations and reviews them with participating companies. In 2025, Tech Coalition expressly administers vetting and grants database access. Meta&#x27;s in-kind hosting on ThreatExchange is reaffirmed. Hosting does not by itself establish editorial approval of individual signals, ownership of participant decisions, or a veto over programme rules. The executed agreement, hosting contract and individual voting or veto rights were not acquired. [2024 report, PDF 5–6](http[local research file] [2025 report, PDF 16, 28–29](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Admission standards have a reported consequence: the 2024 report says one unnamed participant could not meet compliance requirements and would not continue in 2025. This is evidence of the operator announcing non-continuation, not independent identification of that company or confirmation of the revocation date. The report counts 26 enrolled companies at the end of 2024, including three financial institutions; the 2025 report counts 31 at year end. The undated current programme page displays 38 participants as observed on 9 September 2026. Those are different observation periods, not interchangeable totals. NGOs, governments, law enforcement and researchers are excluded from programme participation. A law-enforcement request can initiate a company&#x27;s investigation without making that authority a Lantern member or signal uploader. [2024 report, PDF 4, 7, 9](http[local research file] [2025 report, PDF 9](http[local research file] [programme FAQ](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-enters-the-system-and-who-labels-it\">What enters the system and who labels it</h2>\n<p>Signals extend beyond hashes of known abuse imagery. Public examples include URLs, account identifiers, keywords or codewords, repeated unsolicited contact with minors, attempts to move conversations between platforms, and payment requests or extortion language. Participants choose what to share and ingest within programme rules, their policies and legal obligations. Published rules require manual review before upload and receiving-company investigation before action. They require a connection to online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA), necessity and proportionality, consistency with applicable law and public terms or privacy policies, and permitted sharing under the agreement. These are stated operating requirements, not independent proof of compliance in every case. [Programme page, signal sections and FAQ](http[local research file] [2024 report, PDF 14](http[local research file] [2025 report, PDF 28–29](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Tech Coalition maintains the taxonomy in collaboration with participants, which may propose updates. At least one official taxonomy tag is required; severity and review status accompany signals. The public appendix supplies names and definitions, while the full taxonomy&#x27;s examples are not published, with sensitivity given as the reason. The reports explicitly distinguish platform-policy classifications from legal determinations: some included behaviour may violate a platform&#x27;s policy without being criminal CSAM. [2024 report, PDF 14, 19–21](http[local research file] [2025 report, PDF 14](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The scope of individual tags matters. Minor Sexualization extends beyond criminal imagery. Grooming (Inappropriate Contact) concerns inappropriate adult–child trust-building behaviour before an explicit sexual stage; it does not label every adult–child contact. The outrage and humour meme categories require depiction of CSAM or sexualization of minors; they are not generic political outrage or satire categories. Financial Transaction is supplemental and cannot stand alone: it concerns evidence or communication about a completed or proposed transaction possibly connected to abuse. The supplemental self-harm category is likewise connected to OCSEA. These distinctions prevent promotion of a child-safety taxonomy into an unbounded payments, speech or mental-health classification system. [2024 report, Appendix A, PDF 19–21](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The 2025 report describes a new sadistic-online-exploitation tag tied to sexualized suffering, fear or humiliation; an additional protocol for data about minors suspected of perpetration expects extra precautions to verify the basis and necessity of sharing, with Tech Coalition-coordinated one-to-one sharing with the company directly implicated. Platform tags, including Steam, are cross-platform investigation context; they do not establish membership or an enforcement action. Proposed alignment with the Industry Classification in 2026 is forward-looking language in this report, not proof that it occurred. Whitelisted sharing, introduced in 2024, also permits sharing with selected partners rather than every participant. [2025 report, PDF 14–15](http[local research file] [2024 report, PDF 12](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-financial-route-pilot-expansion-and-an-attributed-case\">The financial route: pilot, expansion and an attributed case</h2>\n<p>The public pilot account, dated 17 July 2025, identifies Cash App, MEGA, Meta, PayPal, Snap and Western Union as the six participants in an August 2024–first-half-2025 pilot. Tech Coalition reports 1,935 shared signals and 108 financial-institution investigations, some still ongoing, plus reports to US government authorities. It does not supply a count of prosecutions or convictions. Financial participants receive signals but do not upload them. The full pilot report is offered through the Member Resource Center or by contacting Tech Coalition; this pass used the public account and did not authenticate or request access. [Pilot results](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>On 14 May 2026, the operator announced eligibility for qualifying financial institutions worldwide, evaluated individually, with priority for peer-to-peer payments. This is an expansion of eligibility, not proof that every bank, payment provider or cryptocurrency service participates. The announcement preserves the receive-only role. [Financial expansion announcement](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>In the 2025 transparency report&#x27;s case study, a law-enforcement request led Meta to conduct its own investigation into alleged CSAM production and distribution, report to NCMEC, and share signals through Lantern. Tech Coalition says Block then identified a network of 18 Cash App accounts suspected of CSAM sales or purchases, closed those accounts, banned users and reported to authorities; Microsoft acted on several Xbox accounts. The report further says law enforcement confirmed a contribution to multiple arrests. No identifiable police release, court docket or underlying order corroborating those arrests was acquired. The evidentiary verb remains “Tech Coalition reports.” This sequence does not show government uploading directly into Lantern. [2025 report, PDF 8](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Block&#x27;s own September 2025 publication independently establishes what that participant publicly says about its use: Cash App is active in Lantern, and its investigations team uses signals as intelligence and assesses detection rules and product or risk controls. This corroborates participation and claimed operational use from the receiving company, but does not independently verify the particular 18-account case. Its adjacent overall NCMEC reporting figure must not be attributed wholly to Lantern. The same page separately places Cash App in ICMEC&#x27;s US Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation; that is a concrete organizational participation bridge, not evidence that ICMEC controls Lantern. [Block report, PDF 19 / printed 18](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"outcome-totals-require-care\">Outcome totals require care</h2>\n<p>The 2025 report counts 983,602 signals shared and retained for that year. Its cumulative figure is 2,047,982 for 2023–2025, with the retention cut-off stated as 3 March 2026. Retained signals are not all uploads ever made, unique people, or verified criminal cases. The combined action headline also adds accounts, URLs and content units; it is not a count of people. Outcomes are voluntarily supplied by companies, and the operator says its downstream-action measures exclude the original uploader&#x27;s prior actions. That is a reported accounting rule, not an independently tested causal estimate. [2025 report, PDF 5–7, 16](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>There is an unresolved discrepancy inside the captured original: PDF 5 and 7 give <strong>31,504</strong> account actions for 2025, while PDF 16 gives <strong>31,485</strong>, a difference of 19. PDF 5 and 16 were visually checked. Do not silently select one or infer wrongdoing from the inconsistency. The report does not establish wrongful-action rates or the proportion of decisions subsequently reversed. The 44,210 removed signals reported on PDF 11 mix reasons that are not publicly disaggregated; deletion is not a measure of confirmed false positives. The separate rights packet covers the original uploader&#x27;s removal right and the gap concerning propagation of corrections to earlier recipient decisions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"read-scope-and-custody\">Read scope and custody</h2>\n<p>Seven originals were captured through ordinary public GETs. <a>lantern-captures.json</a> records exact URLs, byte counts, SHA-256 hashes and reading scopes. Hashes identify original response bytes; extracted text and renders are derivatives. Pages below mean physical PDF pages; printed pages coincide for the two Lantern reports.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Captured source</th>\n<th>Date and actual inspected scope</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">2025 report</a></td>\n<td>Reporting year 2025; release landing dated 28 April 2026. Reader text PDF 3–12 and original extraction PDF 13–16, 24–29 read for this lane. PDF 5 and 16 visually checked. Not a comprehensive visual audit of all 30 pages.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">2024 report</a></td>\n<td>Reporting year 2024; publication day not established. Original text PDF 4–7, 9, 12–14, 19–21 read; cover/contents inspected. PDF 4 and 20 visually checked.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https://technologycoalition.org/programs/lantern/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">Programme page</a></td>\n<td>Undated current page, observed 9 September 2026. Main body, signal sections, FAQ and funding footer read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a>Membership page</a></td>\n<td>Undated current page, observed 9 September 2026. Main body/footer read as general institutional context; no fee amount or Lantern allocation established.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">Financial expansion</a></td>\n<td>Main article dated 14 May 2026, read in full from capture. HTML title names an unrelated Initiate 2026 item; article heading/date/body identify the source used here.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">Financial pilot results</a></td>\n<td>Main article dated 17 July 2025, read in full. Restricted full pilot report not accessed.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer\">Block report</a></td>\n<td>Cover dated 10 September 2025; cover and PDF 19 / printed 18 read from the original. Not a comprehensive review of the 21-page report.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The old <code>/lantern/</code> route failed in the reader; the site&#x27;s actual <code>/programs/lantern/</code> route succeeded. The financial-expansion reader timed out once; an ordinary GET substitute succeeded. Root&#x27;s closed BSR PDF GET failure was not retried; its selected reader passages remain under the separate rights packet&#x27;s custody. No private account or dataset was accessed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"integration-boundary-and-next-discriminator\">Integration boundary and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>Precise supported relations are: Tech Coalition/member funding of Lantern without allocated amounts; Meta&#x27;s in-kind hosting; Tech Coalition admission, access and programme-standard administration; participants&#x27; manual signal selection and shared taxonomy development; and recipients&#x27; own investigation and policy decisions. The 18-account outcome must remain attributed to the operator. No individual member&#x27;s veto, mandatory recipient sanction, government membership, or donor instruction is established.</p>\n<p>The strongest local forest implication is a concrete handoff from platform intelligence to financial-service exclusion, with authority distributed across admission, classification, infrastructure, origination and recipient decision-making. The strongest alternative to a centrally directed sanction system is the published model of legally constrained, company-specific investigations against genuinely cross-platform child exploitation. Public self-reports alone cannot determine how consistently that model operates or how errors travel.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is the operative participant agreement and a worked, anonymized correction case showing originator retraction, notification to prior recipients, treatment of exported copies, reopening of earlier restrictions, and user notice or remedy. Those records would distinguish a reversible intelligence exchange from a system in which corrected signals can leave lasting distributed consequences. The Tech Coalition programme office and involved participants are the likely custodians; no outreach is authorized or undertaken. A disclosed programme budget or hosting agreement would separately resolve who pays what and any associated rights. This bounded pass stops here.</p>",
        "path": "signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09/lantern.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w22-sig-s-report2024",
          "w22-sig-s-report2025",
          "w22-sig-s-program",
          "w22-sig-s-pilot",
          "w22-sig-s-expansion",
          "w22-sig-s-block"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded primary-source pass, observed 9 September 2026. This is Tech Coalition's child-safety programme, not a similarly named political vendor. No canonical case changes. Acquisition stopped at this operational-record breakpoint; rights and remedy analysis is separately recorded in [lantern-rights-review.md](signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review.md).\n\n## Finding and limits\n\nLantern provides a documented mechanism through which one company's child-safety investigation can inform another company's account or financial-service decision. The operator reports a case involving 18 Cash App account closures and action on Xbox accounts. Block separately confirms that its investigations team uses Lantern signals. These are meaningful programme and participant accounts of operational use, but the specific closures, arrests, accuracy and counterfactual effect have not been independently established in this pass. The public material allocates admission and programme standards to Tech Coalition, hosting to Meta, signal selection and labelling to originating companies, and subsequent investigations and enforcement to receiving companies. It does not establish a single actor directing every resulting decision.\n\n## Money, infrastructure and admission\n\nThe 2024 transparency report states that participation has no cost, that Tech Coalition and its members fully fund the programme, and that Meta provides technical hosting in kind. Eligible non-members can apply. This supports organizational funding and an in-kind infrastructure relationship; it does not show a monetary budget, participant-by-participant payment, restricted award, or donor approval right. The current programme and membership pages are institutional descriptions rather than financial ledgers. Their funding statements do not establish the legal entity making each payment. 2024 report, PDF 4 (see source references) programme page (see source references)\n\nTech Coalition administers applications and compliance review. The 2024 report describes a formal legal agreement between participants after acceptance; it also describes more granular requirements for properly staffed teams able to investigate and act responsibly. Tech Coalition maintains the Official Program Expectations and reviews them with participating companies. In 2025, Tech Coalition expressly administers vetting and grants database access. Meta's in-kind hosting on ThreatExchange is reaffirmed. Hosting does not by itself establish editorial approval of individual signals, ownership of participant decisions, or a veto over programme rules. The executed agreement, hosting contract and individual voting or veto rights were not acquired. 2024 report, PDF 5–6 (see source references) 2025 report, PDF 16, 28–29 (see source references)\n\nAdmission standards have a reported consequence: the 2024 report says one unnamed participant could not meet compliance requirements and would not continue in 2025. This is evidence of the operator announcing non-continuation, not independent identification of that company or confirmation of the revocation date. The report counts 26 enrolled companies at the end of 2024, including three financial institutions; the 2025 report counts 31 at year end. The undated current programme page displays 38 participants as observed on 9 September 2026. Those are different observation periods, not interchangeable totals. NGOs, governments, law enforcement and researchers are excluded from programme participation. A law-enforcement request can initiate a company's investigation without making that authority a Lantern member or signal uploader. 2024 report, PDF 4, 7, 9 (see source references) 2025 report, PDF 9 (see source references) programme FAQ (see source references)\n\n## What enters the system and who labels it\n\nSignals extend beyond hashes of known abuse imagery. Public examples include URLs, account identifiers, keywords or codewords, repeated unsolicited contact with minors, attempts to move conversations between platforms, and payment requests or extortion language. Participants choose what to share and ingest within programme rules, their policies and legal obligations. Published rules require manual review before upload and receiving-company investigation before action. They require a connection to online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA), necessity and proportionality, consistency with applicable law and public terms or privacy policies, and permitted sharing under the agreement. These are stated operating requirements, not independent proof of compliance in every case. Programme page, signal sections and FAQ (see source references) 2024 report, PDF 14 (see source references) 2025 report, PDF 28–29 (see source references)\n\nTech Coalition maintains the taxonomy in collaboration with participants, which may propose updates. At least one official taxonomy tag is required; severity and review status accompany signals. The public appendix supplies names and definitions, while the full taxonomy's examples are not published, with sensitivity given as the reason. The reports explicitly distinguish platform-policy classifications from legal determinations: some included behaviour may violate a platform's policy without being criminal CSAM. 2024 report, PDF 14, 19–21 (see source references) 2025 report, PDF 14 (see source references)\n\nThe scope of individual tags matters. Minor Sexualization extends beyond criminal imagery. Grooming (Inappropriate Contact) concerns inappropriate adult–child trust-building behaviour before an explicit sexual stage; it does not label every adult–child contact. The outrage and humour meme categories require depiction of CSAM or sexualization of minors; they are not generic political outrage or satire categories. Financial Transaction is supplemental and cannot stand alone: it concerns evidence or communication about a completed or proposed transaction possibly connected to abuse. The supplemental self-harm category is likewise connected to OCSEA. These distinctions prevent promotion of a child-safety taxonomy into an unbounded payments, speech or mental-health classification system. 2024 report, Appendix A, PDF 19–21 (see source references)\n\nThe 2025 report describes a new sadistic-online-exploitation tag tied to sexualized suffering, fear or humiliation; an additional protocol for data about minors suspected of perpetration expects extra precautions to verify the basis and necessity of sharing, with Tech Coalition-coordinated one-to-one sharing with the company directly implicated. Platform tags, including Steam, are cross-platform investigation context; they do not establish membership or an enforcement action. Proposed alignment with the Industry Classification in 2026 is forward-looking language in this report, not proof that it occurred. Whitelisted sharing, introduced in 2024, also permits sharing with selected partners rather than every participant. 2025 report, PDF 14–15 (see source references) 2024 report, PDF 12 (see source references)\n\n## The financial route: pilot, expansion and an attributed case\n\nThe public pilot account, dated 17 July 2025, identifies Cash App, MEGA, Meta, PayPal, Snap and Western Union as the six participants in an August 2024–first-half-2025 pilot. Tech Coalition reports 1,935 shared signals and 108 financial-institution investigations, some still ongoing, plus reports to US government authorities. It does not supply a count of prosecutions or convictions. Financial participants receive signals but do not upload them. The full pilot report is offered through the Member Resource Center or by contacting Tech Coalition; this pass used the public account and did not authenticate or request access. Pilot results (see source references)\n\nOn 14 May 2026, the operator announced eligibility for qualifying financial institutions worldwide, evaluated individually, with priority for peer-to-peer payments. This is an expansion of eligibility, not proof that every bank, payment provider or cryptocurrency service participates. The announcement preserves the receive-only role. Financial expansion announcement (see source references)\n\nIn the 2025 transparency report's case study, a law-enforcement request led Meta to conduct its own investigation into alleged CSAM production and distribution, report to NCMEC, and share signals through Lantern. Tech Coalition says Block then identified a network of 18 Cash App accounts suspected of CSAM sales or purchases, closed those accounts, banned users and reported to authorities; Microsoft acted on several Xbox accounts. The report further says law enforcement confirmed a contribution to multiple arrests. No identifiable police release, court docket or underlying order corroborating those arrests was acquired. The evidentiary verb remains “Tech Coalition reports.” This sequence does not show government uploading directly into Lantern. 2025 report, PDF 8 (see source references)\n\nBlock's own September 2025 publication independently establishes what that participant publicly says about its use: Cash App is active in Lantern, and its investigations team uses signals as intelligence and assesses detection rules and product or risk controls. This corroborates participation and claimed operational use from the receiving company, but does not independently verify the particular 18-account case. Its adjacent overall NCMEC reporting figure must not be attributed wholly to Lantern. The same page separately places Cash App in ICMEC's US Financial Coalition Against Child Sexual Exploitation; that is a concrete organizational participation bridge, not evidence that ICMEC controls Lantern. Block report, PDF 19 / printed 18 (see source references)\n\n## Outcome totals require care\n\nThe 2025 report counts 983,602 signals shared and retained for that year. Its cumulative figure is 2,047,982 for 2023–2025, with the retention cut-off stated as 3 March 2026. Retained signals are not all uploads ever made, unique people, or verified criminal cases. The combined action headline also adds accounts, URLs and content units; it is not a count of people. Outcomes are voluntarily supplied by companies, and the operator says its downstream-action measures exclude the original uploader's prior actions. That is a reported accounting rule, not an independently tested causal estimate. 2025 report, PDF 5–7, 16 (see source references)\n\nThere is an unresolved discrepancy inside the captured original: PDF 5 and 7 give **31,504** account actions for 2025, while PDF 16 gives **31,485**, a difference of 19. PDF 5 and 16 were visually checked. Do not silently select one or infer wrongdoing from the inconsistency. The report does not establish wrongful-action rates or the proportion of decisions subsequently reversed. The 44,210 removed signals reported on PDF 11 mix reasons that are not publicly disaggregated; deletion is not a measure of confirmed false positives. The separate rights packet covers the original uploader's removal right and the gap concerning propagation of corrections to earlier recipient decisions.\n\n## Read scope and custody\n\nSeven originals were captured through ordinary public GETs. lantern-captures.json records exact URLs, byte counts, SHA-256 hashes and reading scopes. Hashes identify original response bytes; extracted text and renders are derivatives. Pages below mean physical PDF pages; printed pages coincide for the two Lantern reports.\n\n| Captured source | Date and actual inspected scope |\n| --- | --- |\n| [2025 report](https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf) | Reporting year 2025; release landing dated 28 April 2026. Reader text PDF 3–12 and original extraction PDF 13–16, 24–29 read for this lane. PDF 5 and 16 visually checked. Not a comprehensive visual audit of all 30 pages. |\n| [2024 report](https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf) | Reporting year 2024; publication day not established. Original text PDF 4–7, 9, 12–14, 19–21 read; cover/contents inspected. PDF 4 and 20 visually checked. |\n| [Programme page](https://technologycoalition.org/programs/lantern/) | Undated current page, observed 9 September 2026. Main body, signal sections, FAQ and funding footer read. |\n| Membership page | Undated current page, observed 9 September 2026. Main body/footer read as general institutional context; no fee amount or Lantern allocation established. |\n| [Financial expansion](https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/) | Main article dated 14 May 2026, read in full from capture. HTML title names an unrelated Initiate 2026 item; article heading/date/body identify the source used here. |\n| [Financial pilot results](https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/) | Main article dated 17 July 2025, read in full. Restricted full pilot report not accessed. |\n| [Block report](https://block.xyz/documents/access-and-protection-for-teens-in-the-digital-economy.pdf) | Cover dated 10 September 2025; cover and PDF 19 / printed 18 read from the original. Not a comprehensive review of the 21-page report. |\n\nThe old `/lantern/` route failed in the reader; the site's actual `/programs/lantern/` route succeeded. The financial-expansion reader timed out once; an ordinary GET substitute succeeded. Root's closed BSR PDF GET failure was not retried; its selected reader passages remain under the separate rights packet's custody. No private account or dataset was accessed.\n\n## Integration boundary and next discriminator\n\nPrecise supported relations are: Tech Coalition/member funding of Lantern without allocated amounts; Meta's in-kind hosting; Tech Coalition admission, access and programme-standard administration; participants' manual signal selection and shared taxonomy development; and recipients' own investigation and policy decisions. The 18-account outcome must remain attributed to the operator. No individual member's veto, mandatory recipient sanction, government membership, or donor instruction is established.\n\nThe strongest local forest implication is a concrete handoff from platform intelligence to financial-service exclusion, with authority distributed across admission, classification, infrastructure, origination and recipient decision-making. The strongest alternative to a centrally directed sanction system is the published model of legally constrained, company-specific investigations against genuinely cross-platform child exploitation. Public self-reports alone cannot determine how consistently that model operates or how errors travel.\n\nThe next discriminating record is the operative participant agreement and a worked, anonymized correction case showing originator retraction, notification to prior recipients, treatment of exported copies, reopening of earlier restrictions, and user notice or remedy. Those records would distinguish a reversible intelligence exchange from a system in which corrected signals can leave lasting distributed consequences. The Tech Coalition programme office and involved participants are the likely custodians; no outreach is authorized or undertaken. A disclosed programme budget or hosting agreement would separately resolve who pays what and any associated rights. This bounded pass stops here.\n",
        "file": "research/signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources",
        "title": "SWGfL, StopNCII and the Revenge Porn Helpline: operator resources and decision rights",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Acquisition closed. This lane establishes the charity/legal operator, dated restricted resources and constitutional authority. Root owns partner terms/admission; Hubble owns user entry/withdrawal. No personal case, image, hash list, application, account, outreach or paid source was accessed.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Acquisition closed. This lane establishes the charity/legal operator, dated restricted resources and constitutional authority. Root owns partner terms/admission; Hubble owns user entry/withdrawal. No personal case, image, hash list, application, account, outreach or paid source was accessed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"one-charity-distinct-services\">One charity, distinct services</h2>\n<p>The retained [FY2025 filed accounts](http[local research file] identify <strong>South West Grid for Learning Trust</strong>, company <strong>05589479</strong>, charity England/Wales <strong>1120354</strong>, Scotland <strong>SC051351</strong>. The cover and administrative pages identify the numbers; Note1, PDF21/printed19, says it is an English/Welsh company limited by guarantee with no share capital. This is the legal charity behind the SWGfL brand, not Meta&#x27;s equity subsidiary.</p>\n<p>The charity&#x27;s trustees report discusses the Revenge Porn Helpline as one of its support services (PDF5/printed3) and StopNCII as part of its international work (PDF6/printed4). Its [current institutional page](http[local research file] also lists both under its services. The CEO biography attributes creation of the Helpline in2015 and oversight of StopNCII development to David Wright; Will Earp&#x27;s current role includes platform development and industry integration. These are operator accounts, not proof of an individually delegated authority over every submitted case. No separate corporation for either named programme was established.</p>\n<p>The same current page describes trustee Karuna Nain&#x27;s former Meta safety-policy role and work with SWGfL on StopNCII&#x27;s launch. [Companies House&#x27;s filing history](http[local research file] records her appointment as director on3April2024, filed26April2024. It records Hanna&#x27;s appointment on11September2024, filed6June2025. The acquired record supports a personnel transition and board role, not Meta ownership, a Meta-nominated seat, or an exercised funder veto. Appointment instruments and their underlying trustee resolutions were not acquired. No wider biography branch was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"dated-programme-money-without-turning-accounts-into-a-cash-ledger\">Dated programme money, without turning accounts into a cash ledger</h2>\n<p>The accounts&#x27; Note19, PDF34–36/printed32–34, contains the following restricted-fund movements. Each listed incoming amount is matched by an equal amount of resources expended, with no opening or closing restricted balance shown for those rows. Amounts are GBP. The FY2024 numbers are comparative figures in this same FY2025 filing; do not add them to FY2025 as one annual budget.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Accounts fund label</th>\n<th>Year ended31March2024: incoming / expended</th>\n<th>Year ended31March2025: incoming / expended</th>\n<th>Stated purpose and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Pershing Grant</td>\n<td>£78,847 / £78,847</td>\n<td>£75,802 / £75,802</td>\n<td>Purpose paragraph expressly names StopNCII support. Exact donor legal entity and grant agreement are not identified in the inspected accounts.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>META/Facebook</td>\n<td>£20,000 / £20,000</td>\n<td>No separate row shown</td>\n<td>Comparative restricted support for combating non-consensual intimate-image sharing and supporting victims. This is broader than a proved StopNCII-only allocation. Omission from the next year&#x27;s restricted table does not prove that financial, technical or unrestricted support ended.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Home Office Grant – RP</td>\n<td>£150,000 / £150,000</td>\n<td>£225,000 / £225,000</td>\n<td>Purpose stated as support work combating violence against women and girls. Not a demonstrated StopNCII allocation or classification instruction.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Nominet and TikTok funds in the same note have expressly different UK Safer Internet Centre purposes. Their presence in the same charity&#x27;s accounts does not assign them to StopNCII. Other grants were not traced into new donor networks.</p>\n<p>The recognition policy (PDF22/printed20) is consequential: income is recognized when entitlement and performance conditions are met, receipt is probable and value can be measured. Advance income may be deferred; expenditure follows legal/constructive obligation and reliable/probable settlement. These are accounting income/expense states, not acquired bank-payment receipts or evidence that a funder accepted a named technical deliverable. Nor is the Pershing row the total cost of StopNCII. The accounts provide neither a programme cost centre nor a full allocation of unrestricted income, in-kind support and platform fees to the service.</p>\n<p>The financial statements carry an independent auditor&#x27;s positive opinion (PDF13/printed11). That page expressly separates other trustee-report information from its assurance opinion. Programme-impact statements therefore remain the operator&#x27;s account rather than audited moderation outcomes. Financial-year scope is31March2025; Companies House received this filing31December2025. Some trustee narrative addresses events after the financial year or earlier reporting periods; no impact count is recast here as a clean FY2025 outcome.</p>\n<h2 id=\"actual-constitutional-authority\">Actual constitutional authority</h2>\n<p>The [retained articles](http[local research file] state adoption by special resolution on<strong>10October2024</strong> (PDF4/printed1), filed29October2024. This is a concrete governance instrument, not merely a partnership page. The accounts also refer to an earlier January2024 constitutional change; this run does not reconstruct the full earlier transition.</p>\n<p>Article8.1 makes the trustees the only members; a trustee becomes a member on appointment. Membership is nontransferable and ends when trusteeship ends (PDF12–13/printed9–10). Article10.7 gives each member one vote. This corporate membership is distinct from a StopNCII platform&#x27;s programme participation.</p>\n<p>Articles13–14 put business management with the trustees and allow trustee appointment by trustee resolution (PDF15/printed12). Removal provisions include statutory/charity grounds and an internal resolution process with notice and opportunity for representations (PDF16/printed13). These provisions do not allocate a named donor an appointment right. They also do not prove how a particular appointment was proposed or influenced.</p>\n<p>Articles19–22 describe a default trustee quorum of one-third unless otherwise fixed, majority decisions at a meeting and a separate75%-of-eligible-trustees agreement route; the chair can have a casting vote (PDF18/printed15). Article23 permits committees including at least one trustee, nontrustee committee participants approved by trustees, and delegation of day-to-day management. Delegation terms must be recorded; committees report to trustees, who can alter or revoke delegation. Terms may restrict expenditure to trustee approval or a previously agreed budget (PDF19/printed16). This is permission to impose those conditions, not a retrieved StopNCII committee budget or minute.</p>\n<p>Articles24 and26 cover interest declarations/absence, qualified authorization of loyalty conflicts by unconflicted trustees, and trustee appointment of a CEO who reports, advises on policy/budget/funding and implements trustee policy (PDF19–20/printed16–17). Other article5 authorizations were not fully read, so this packet does not claim universal recusal with no exceptions. The trustee report describes Board governance supported by finance/audit, technical, data and communications subgroups (PDF9/printed7); their actual terms, minutes and programme decisions were not acquired.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-now-visible-what-remains-consequentially-open\">What is now visible; what remains consequentially open</h2>\n<p>There is direct evidence of earmarked support reaching the operator&#x27;s accounts for StopNCII and broader victim-support work, alongside a trustee-governed charity constitution. Funds, corporate membership, service participation and individual trustee biographies are different relationships. The documents do not establish that Meta, Pershing, government or a paying platform selected an entry, dictated a definition, approved a withdrawal or controlled another platform&#x27;s action.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the executed programme grant/partnership schedules, the current StopNCII internal delegation/budget and any actual approval or reporting instrument. Those could reveal renewal/termination rights, deliverable acceptance, IP ownership, policy clearance or operational conditions beyond the purpose restrictions visible in the accounts. A current public donor-side record could resolve the abbreviated Pershing label; this run leaves it unexpanded. Likely custodians are SWGfL and the respective funder/partner. No request was made.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-finite-scope-and-closed-routes\">Custody, finite scope and closed routes</h2>\n<p><code>operator-captures.json</code> records the two original scanned PDFs, independently published Companies House history HTML, scoped SWGfL primary-reader evidence and failures. PDF text extraction produced no substantive text; local renders, not empty derivatives, supplied the reading. Full-size financial/table/governance pages are retained as <code>operator-accounts2025-p*.png</code> and <code>operator-articles2024-p*.png</code>. The manifest distinguishes full-size reads from contact-sheet navigation and pages merely rendered.</p>\n<p>Six focused discovery queries covered SWGfL annual reporting/funding, current accounts, StopNCII supporters and the abbreviated Pershing label. Search-only FY2023 and multilingual supporter passages were not promoted into findings. The Charity Commission accounts landing returned403 and the French StopNCII supporters route a verification challenge. Automatic approval review rejected a proposed bundled ordinary-GET retry before execution; those routes and language variants remained closed. Companies House supplied independently published originals. SWGfL About&#x27;s original GET timed out; its already successful scoped primary reader remains the evidence, without an original-byte claim. The accounts&#x27; web-reader later errored; the existing successful original was read locally, with no retry. No further acquisition follows this packet before root&#x27;s combined forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09/operator-resources.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-accounts2025",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-articles",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-about",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-ch-history"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Acquisition closed. This lane establishes the charity/legal operator, dated restricted resources and constitutional authority. Root owns partner terms/admission; Hubble owns user entry/withdrawal. No personal case, image, hash list, application, account, outreach or paid source was accessed.\n\n## One charity, distinct services\n\nThe retained FY2025 filed accounts (see source references) identify **South West Grid for Learning Trust**, company **05589479**, charity England/Wales **1120354**, Scotland **SC051351**. The cover and administrative pages identify the numbers; Note1, PDF21/printed19, says it is an English/Welsh company limited by guarantee with no share capital. This is the legal charity behind the SWGfL brand, not Meta's equity subsidiary.\n\nThe charity's trustees report discusses the Revenge Porn Helpline as one of its support services (PDF5/printed3) and StopNCII as part of its international work (PDF6/printed4). Its current institutional page (see source references) also lists both under its services. The CEO biography attributes creation of the Helpline in2015 and oversight of StopNCII development to David Wright; Will Earp's current role includes platform development and industry integration. These are operator accounts, not proof of an individually delegated authority over every submitted case. No separate corporation for either named programme was established.\n\nThe same current page describes trustee Karuna Nain's former Meta safety-policy role and work with SWGfL on StopNCII's launch. Companies House's filing history (see source references) records her appointment as director on3April2024, filed26April2024. It records Hanna's appointment on11September2024, filed6June2025. The acquired record supports a personnel transition and board role, not Meta ownership, a Meta-nominated seat, or an exercised funder veto. Appointment instruments and their underlying trustee resolutions were not acquired. No wider biography branch was opened.\n\n## Dated programme money, without turning accounts into a cash ledger\n\nThe accounts' Note19, PDF34–36/printed32–34, contains the following restricted-fund movements. Each listed incoming amount is matched by an equal amount of resources expended, with no opening or closing restricted balance shown for those rows. Amounts are GBP. The FY2024 numbers are comparative figures in this same FY2025 filing; do not add them to FY2025 as one annual budget.\n\n| Accounts fund label | Year ended31March2024: incoming / expended | Year ended31March2025: incoming / expended | Stated purpose and limit |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Pershing Grant | £78,847 / £78,847 | £75,802 / £75,802 | Purpose paragraph expressly names StopNCII support. Exact donor legal entity and grant agreement are not identified in the inspected accounts. |\n| META/Facebook | £20,000 / £20,000 | No separate row shown | Comparative restricted support for combating non-consensual intimate-image sharing and supporting victims. This is broader than a proved StopNCII-only allocation. Omission from the next year's restricted table does not prove that financial, technical or unrestricted support ended. |\n| Home Office Grant – RP | £150,000 / £150,000 | £225,000 / £225,000 | Purpose stated as support work combating violence against women and girls. Not a demonstrated StopNCII allocation or classification instruction. |\n\nNominet and TikTok funds in the same note have expressly different UK Safer Internet Centre purposes. Their presence in the same charity's accounts does not assign them to StopNCII. Other grants were not traced into new donor networks.\n\nThe recognition policy (PDF22/printed20) is consequential: income is recognized when entitlement and performance conditions are met, receipt is probable and value can be measured. Advance income may be deferred; expenditure follows legal/constructive obligation and reliable/probable settlement. These are accounting income/expense states, not acquired bank-payment receipts or evidence that a funder accepted a named technical deliverable. Nor is the Pershing row the total cost of StopNCII. The accounts provide neither a programme cost centre nor a full allocation of unrestricted income, in-kind support and platform fees to the service.\n\nThe financial statements carry an independent auditor's positive opinion (PDF13/printed11). That page expressly separates other trustee-report information from its assurance opinion. Programme-impact statements therefore remain the operator's account rather than audited moderation outcomes. Financial-year scope is31March2025; Companies House received this filing31December2025. Some trustee narrative addresses events after the financial year or earlier reporting periods; no impact count is recast here as a clean FY2025 outcome.\n\n## Actual constitutional authority\n\nThe retained articles (see source references) state adoption by special resolution on**10October2024** (PDF4/printed1), filed29October2024. This is a concrete governance instrument, not merely a partnership page. The accounts also refer to an earlier January2024 constitutional change; this run does not reconstruct the full earlier transition.\n\nArticle8.1 makes the trustees the only members; a trustee becomes a member on appointment. Membership is nontransferable and ends when trusteeship ends (PDF12–13/printed9–10). Article10.7 gives each member one vote. This corporate membership is distinct from a StopNCII platform's programme participation.\n\nArticles13–14 put business management with the trustees and allow trustee appointment by trustee resolution (PDF15/printed12). Removal provisions include statutory/charity grounds and an internal resolution process with notice and opportunity for representations (PDF16/printed13). These provisions do not allocate a named donor an appointment right. They also do not prove how a particular appointment was proposed or influenced.\n\nArticles19–22 describe a default trustee quorum of one-third unless otherwise fixed, majority decisions at a meeting and a separate75%-of-eligible-trustees agreement route; the chair can have a casting vote (PDF18/printed15). Article23 permits committees including at least one trustee, nontrustee committee participants approved by trustees, and delegation of day-to-day management. Delegation terms must be recorded; committees report to trustees, who can alter or revoke delegation. Terms may restrict expenditure to trustee approval or a previously agreed budget (PDF19/printed16). This is permission to impose those conditions, not a retrieved StopNCII committee budget or minute.\n\nArticles24 and26 cover interest declarations/absence, qualified authorization of loyalty conflicts by unconflicted trustees, and trustee appointment of a CEO who reports, advises on policy/budget/funding and implements trustee policy (PDF19–20/printed16–17). Other article5 authorizations were not fully read, so this packet does not claim universal recusal with no exceptions. The trustee report describes Board governance supported by finance/audit, technical, data and communications subgroups (PDF9/printed7); their actual terms, minutes and programme decisions were not acquired.\n\n## What is now visible; what remains consequentially open\n\nThere is direct evidence of earmarked support reaching the operator's accounts for StopNCII and broader victim-support work, alongside a trustee-governed charity constitution. Funds, corporate membership, service participation and individual trustee biographies are different relationships. The documents do not establish that Meta, Pershing, government or a paying platform selected an entry, dictated a definition, approved a withdrawal or controlled another platform's action.\n\nThe next discriminating records are the executed programme grant/partnership schedules, the current StopNCII internal delegation/budget and any actual approval or reporting instrument. Those could reveal renewal/termination rights, deliverable acceptance, IP ownership, policy clearance or operational conditions beyond the purpose restrictions visible in the accounts. A current public donor-side record could resolve the abbreviated Pershing label; this run leaves it unexpanded. Likely custodians are SWGfL and the respective funder/partner. No request was made.\n\n## Custody, finite scope and closed routes\n\n`operator-captures.json` records the two original scanned PDFs, independently published Companies House history HTML, scoped SWGfL primary-reader evidence and failures. PDF text extraction produced no substantive text; local renders, not empty derivatives, supplied the reading. Full-size financial/table/governance pages are retained as `operator-accounts2025-p*.png` and `operator-articles2024-p*.png`. The manifest distinguishes full-size reads from contact-sheet navigation and pages merely rendered.\n\nSix focused discovery queries covered SWGfL annual reporting/funding, current accounts, StopNCII supporters and the abbreviated Pershing label. Search-only FY2023 and multilingual supporter passages were not promoted into findings. The Charity Commission accounts landing returned403 and the French StopNCII supporters route a verification challenge. Automatic approval review rejected a proposed bundled ordinary-GET retry before execution; those routes and language variants remained closed. Companies House supplied independently published originals. SWGfL About's original GET timed out; its already successful scoped primary reader remains the evidence, without an original-byte claim. The accounts' web-reader later errored; the existing successful original was read locally, with no retry. No further acquisition follows this packet before root's combined forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-operator-resources.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority",
        "title": "Partner access, contributions and downstream actions",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition CLOSED. StopNCII exposes several distinct gates: admission and payment, reference contributions and feedback, withdrawal processing, and platform action. Published terms are not an executed partner-specific agreement. All observations below concern public administrative records; no live case or operational API was used.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root acquisition CLOSED. StopNCII exposes several distinct gates: admission and payment, reference contributions and feedback, withdrawal processing, and platform action. Published terms are not an executed partner-specific agreement. All observations below concern public administrative records; no live case or operational API was used.</p>\n<h2 id=\"access-costs-and-participation\">Access costs and participation</h2>\n<p>The [join page](http[local research file] offers Approved Participant and Programme Partner routes. Its comparison table assigns both every listed network/support/development benefit. Yet the [Approved Participant page](http[local research file] expressly denies wider programme/network involvement. This is a real description conflict, not evidence of an undisclosed voting arrangement. The [Programme Partner page](http[local research file] advertises active engagement, working groups and opportunities to influence tools/policies; it grants no stated vote or veto.</p>\n<p>All four embedded fee/onboarding diagrams were acquired and visually read. Both routes show registration, verification, a data-sharing agreement, payment and integration. The full programme adds meeting the team and announcement. Published annual GBP fees, in the same revenue bands, are:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Revenue band</th>\n<th>Approved Participant</th>\n<th>Programme Partner</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>New business</td>\n<td>1,000</td>\n<td>1,000</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Below 10 million</td>\n<td>4,000</td>\n<td>10,000</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10–249 million</td>\n<td>8,000</td>\n<td>20,000</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>250–499 million</td>\n<td>12,000</td>\n<td>30,000</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>500–999 million</td>\n<td>16,000</td>\n<td>40,000</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Over 1 billion</td>\n<td>20,000</td>\n<td>50,000</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are undated published schedules, not invoices, revenue received or proof every earlier partner paid. The wording leaves exact intervening band boundaries unclarified. The user-facing service being free does not establish free organizational access.</p>\n<h2 id=\"posted-instrument-with-visible-drafting-limitations\">Posted instrument, with visible drafting limitations</h2>\n<p>[Partner Terms](http[local research file] cover manual and automated admission. They incorporate the unacquired data-sharing agreement and registration form. Sections3–10/schedule specify the lower fee schedule, eligibility/reverification, discretionary refusal, credential controls, security assessment, local caching and access suspension. Redistribution is prohibited; model training has a purpose-limited exception. Permitted purpose depends on the separate agreement. Termination requires cessation/deletion and written certification; annual summaries are due within60days of the access anniversary.</p>\n<p>The posting contains conflicting company/charity identifiers, an empty hash-value definition, inconsistent defined-purpose terminology, bracketed implementation/amendment/certification periods and an explicit unfinished implementation note. Do not present those brackets as settled deadlines. Key-compromise notice is24hours; the schedule&#x27;s general incident notice is48hours—retain their distinct scopes. The five-day certification placeholder concerns partner termination, not each user withdrawal. No signed data-sharing agreement, precedence clause resolving these inconsistencies, executed admission/refusal or payment was acquired. No displayed effective date was established.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-screens-applicants-and-who-reviews-a-challenge\">Who screens applicants and who reviews a challenge</h2>\n<p>[SWGfL privacy](http[local research file] Working with Partners, names Deloitte LLP for business verification and Neterium for sanctions/PEP/watchlist/adverse-media screening. This concerns applicant businesses and connected officials, not identification of people submitting intimate-image cases. The notice describes human consideration of adverse results and rejects solely automated refusals. It promises notice where screening influenced an adverse decision, an uninvolved reviewer on request, correction/annotation and relevant corrections passed to vendors. Acknowledgment is2workingdays and substantive response30workingdays. Applicant records are retained during the relationship plus3years, or3years for unsuccessful applications.</p>\n<p>Those are specific process commitments. The partner terms&#x27; general sole-discretion/no-reasons clause remains broader; no acquired priority rule resolves every refusal category. This is not a proved exercise of arbitrary denial or an observed successful appeal. The retained HTML references vendor privacy notices without supplying actual links. Root read the complete partner section; other SWGfL processing purposes are outside this lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-database-has-more-than-a-public-user-input\">The database has more than a public-user input</h2>\n<p>The [API guide](http[local research file] cover date08/10/2025, describes SWGfL-issued provider credentials, CSP hash submissions, NGO-reviewed Active entries, public-user Received entries and independent provider feedback. It documents change timestamps and asks recipients to record status changes. These are interface descriptions, not proof each function or input category is deployed.</p>\n<p>Printed6–10 and14–15 distinguish multiple associated cases, provider contributions, feedback replacement/removal and withdrawal of an organization&#x27;s own submissions. Deletion markers have limited availability; pagination guidance warns that delayed retrieval can miss deleted records. Printed6&#x27;s Withdrawn→Deleted timing and printed15&#x27;s minimum24-hour withdrawal description should not become one exact tested retention guarantee. A batch-management feature is expressly unimplemented. Text/URL type labels and the political-free-speech example are schema/example content, not observed censorship records. Neither generic status feedback nor database withdrawal proves restoration of content/accounts. Ordinary PDF retrieval timed out; the complete16-page reader text was read, without executing examples or obtaining operational data.</p>\n<h2 id=\"named-operating-accounts-and-timeline\">Named operating accounts and timeline</h2>\n<p>[SWGfL, 13March2024](http[local research file] announced updated PhotoDNA integration allowing on-device hashing and access by more already-equipped platforms. It also announced Niantic joining. Microsoft provided an attributed supporting statement. This predates the Coalition&#x27;s January2025 expanded-sublicensing announcement; that later announcement is not the first use of PhotoDNA for adult NCII.</p>\n<p>[Microsoft, 5September2024](http[local research file] reports donating the capability that March and piloting StopNCII in Bing, with action on268,899 images by the end of August. This is an operator-reported aggregate for image-search results, not an independent audit, unique victims or removal from source websites. Its separate direct-report process describes review against Microsoft&#x27;s policy and global search delisting. Full substantive reader body read; original GET403 closed.</p>\n<p>[Google, 17September2025](http[local research file] announced planned hash use over the following months. It is not itself proof of completed implementation. No later completion record was located in the single focused Google follow-up query.</p>\n<p>The [eSafety August2025 report, updated February2026](http[local research file] records Snap using StopNCII on Spotlight/Discover/Stories, excluding Withdrawn/Deleted entries, with daily updates. Its Chat row does not list StopNCII. Printed7/11/18 establish the15June–15December2024 reporting period and that this summarizes provider responses, not comprehensive regulator testing. That supplies a dated, legally requested recipient account of withdrawal filtering, not a paired individual deletion/restoration trace or current2026 operating guarantee. Ordinary GET timed out and table screenshot failed; reader table/text scopes were read. No original PDF is claimed.</p>\n<p>[Free Speech Coalition, 26February2026](http[local research file] urges adoption by adult platforms and explicitly links the case to legal/reputational risk and credibility with banks/payment processors. This is an industry association&#x27;s recommendation, not a bank mandate or a payment-disconnection record. Its named adopters and volume claims were not independently corroborated here. The full body was read; retained Article metadata dates publication26February2026 and modification27February2026.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-establishes-and-what-would-change-the-conclusion\">What this establishes and what would change the conclusion</h2>\n<p>The documented architecture permits institutional contributions and differentiated access while preserving platform policy judgments. It includes a described withdrawal channel and a named recipient account of honoring withdrawal states. There is no basis here for claiming all withdrawal requests fail, all recipients obey an automatic command, or banks require this particular product. The most useful missing record remains a current signed data-sharing agreement with its permitted-purpose and correction provisions, followed by a public implementation/audit trace. Wider operator resources and governance are in the sibling finance lane.</p>\n<p>Custody: partners-captures.json records eight successful HTML originals, four original administrative JPGs, one403 error and two PDF timeouts. HTML text derivatives are separate. Complete substantive reads: join/programme/approved, all partner terms/schedule, PhotoDNA2024, Google2025 and FSC2026; scoped SWGfL partner privacy; all four diagrams visually. Reader-only: full Microsoft2024 body; full16-page API text; eSafety cover/date, report-period/limitations passages and Table3 Snap row. Other eSafety pages/search snippets are not a whole-report reading. The one malformed discovery query is excluded; eight other focused queries were used. A direct agreement query located no separate executed document within this finite search. Sources retain their own dates and claims. No registration form, case-status service, API, private dataset, outreach or paid action was used. Acquisition stopped for review and forest.</p>",
        "path": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09/partner-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-join",
          "w28-access-s-stop-programme",
          "w28-access-s-stop-approved",
          "w28-access-s-stop-partner-terms",
          "w28-access-s-swgfl-partner-privacy",
          "w28-access-s-approved-fees",
          "w28-access-s-programme-fees",
          "w28-access-s-approved-onboarding",
          "w28-access-s-programme-onboarding",
          "w28-access-s-stop-api",
          "w28-access-s-stop-photodna2024",
          "w28-access-s-bing2024",
          "w28-access-s-google-stop2025",
          "w28-access-s-snap-esafety",
          "w28-access-s-fsc-adoption"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root acquisition CLOSED. StopNCII exposes several distinct gates: admission and payment, reference contributions and feedback, withdrawal processing, and platform action. Published terms are not an executed partner-specific agreement. All observations below concern public administrative records; no live case or operational API was used.\n\n## Access costs and participation\n\nThe join page (see source references) offers Approved Participant and Programme Partner routes. Its comparison table assigns both every listed network/support/development benefit. Yet the Approved Participant page (see source references) expressly denies wider programme/network involvement. This is a real description conflict, not evidence of an undisclosed voting arrangement. The Programme Partner page (see source references) advertises active engagement, working groups and opportunities to influence tools/policies; it grants no stated vote or veto.\n\nAll four embedded fee/onboarding diagrams were acquired and visually read. Both routes show registration, verification, a data-sharing agreement, payment and integration. The full programme adds meeting the team and announcement. Published annual GBP fees, in the same revenue bands, are:\n\n| Revenue band | Approved Participant | Programme Partner |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| New business | 1,000 | 1,000 |\n| Below 10 million | 4,000 | 10,000 |\n| 10–249 million | 8,000 | 20,000 |\n| 250–499 million | 12,000 | 30,000 |\n| 500–999 million | 16,000 | 40,000 |\n| Over 1 billion | 20,000 | 50,000 |\n\nThese are undated published schedules, not invoices, revenue received or proof every earlier partner paid. The wording leaves exact intervening band boundaries unclarified. The user-facing service being free does not establish free organizational access.\n\n## Posted instrument, with visible drafting limitations\n\nPartner Terms (see source references) cover manual and automated admission. They incorporate the unacquired data-sharing agreement and registration form. Sections3–10/schedule specify the lower fee schedule, eligibility/reverification, discretionary refusal, credential controls, security assessment, local caching and access suspension. Redistribution is prohibited; model training has a purpose-limited exception. Permitted purpose depends on the separate agreement. Termination requires cessation/deletion and written certification; annual summaries are due within60days of the access anniversary.\n\nThe posting contains conflicting company/charity identifiers, an empty hash-value definition, inconsistent defined-purpose terminology, bracketed implementation/amendment/certification periods and an explicit unfinished implementation note. Do not present those brackets as settled deadlines. Key-compromise notice is24hours; the schedule's general incident notice is48hours—retain their distinct scopes. The five-day certification placeholder concerns partner termination, not each user withdrawal. No signed data-sharing agreement, precedence clause resolving these inconsistencies, executed admission/refusal or payment was acquired. No displayed effective date was established.\n\n## Who screens applicants and who reviews a challenge\n\nSWGfL privacy (see source references) Working with Partners, names Deloitte LLP for business verification and Neterium for sanctions/PEP/watchlist/adverse-media screening. This concerns applicant businesses and connected officials, not identification of people submitting intimate-image cases. The notice describes human consideration of adverse results and rejects solely automated refusals. It promises notice where screening influenced an adverse decision, an uninvolved reviewer on request, correction/annotation and relevant corrections passed to vendors. Acknowledgment is2workingdays and substantive response30workingdays. Applicant records are retained during the relationship plus3years, or3years for unsuccessful applications.\n\nThose are specific process commitments. The partner terms' general sole-discretion/no-reasons clause remains broader; no acquired priority rule resolves every refusal category. This is not a proved exercise of arbitrary denial or an observed successful appeal. The retained HTML references vendor privacy notices without supplying actual links. Root read the complete partner section; other SWGfL processing purposes are outside this lane.\n\n## The database has more than a public-user input\n\nThe API guide (see source references) cover date08/10/2025, describes SWGfL-issued provider credentials, CSP hash submissions, NGO-reviewed Active entries, public-user Received entries and independent provider feedback. It documents change timestamps and asks recipients to record status changes. These are interface descriptions, not proof each function or input category is deployed.\n\nPrinted6–10 and14–15 distinguish multiple associated cases, provider contributions, feedback replacement/removal and withdrawal of an organization's own submissions. Deletion markers have limited availability; pagination guidance warns that delayed retrieval can miss deleted records. Printed6's Withdrawn→Deleted timing and printed15's minimum24-hour withdrawal description should not become one exact tested retention guarantee. A batch-management feature is expressly unimplemented. Text/URL type labels and the political-free-speech example are schema/example content, not observed censorship records. Neither generic status feedback nor database withdrawal proves restoration of content/accounts. Ordinary PDF retrieval timed out; the complete16-page reader text was read, without executing examples or obtaining operational data.\n\n## Named operating accounts and timeline\n\nSWGfL, 13March2024 (see source references) announced updated PhotoDNA integration allowing on-device hashing and access by more already-equipped platforms. It also announced Niantic joining. Microsoft provided an attributed supporting statement. This predates the Coalition's January2025 expanded-sublicensing announcement; that later announcement is not the first use of PhotoDNA for adult NCII.\n\nMicrosoft, 5September2024 (see source references) reports donating the capability that March and piloting StopNCII in Bing, with action on268,899 images by the end of August. This is an operator-reported aggregate for image-search results, not an independent audit, unique victims or removal from source websites. Its separate direct-report process describes review against Microsoft's policy and global search delisting. Full substantive reader body read; original GET403 closed.\n\nGoogle, 17September2025 (see source references) announced planned hash use over the following months. It is not itself proof of completed implementation. No later completion record was located in the single focused Google follow-up query.\n\nThe eSafety August2025 report, updated February2026 (see source references) records Snap using StopNCII on Spotlight/Discover/Stories, excluding Withdrawn/Deleted entries, with daily updates. Its Chat row does not list StopNCII. Printed7/11/18 establish the15June–15December2024 reporting period and that this summarizes provider responses, not comprehensive regulator testing. That supplies a dated, legally requested recipient account of withdrawal filtering, not a paired individual deletion/restoration trace or current2026 operating guarantee. Ordinary GET timed out and table screenshot failed; reader table/text scopes were read. No original PDF is claimed.\n\nFree Speech Coalition, 26February2026 (see source references) urges adoption by adult platforms and explicitly links the case to legal/reputational risk and credibility with banks/payment processors. This is an industry association's recommendation, not a bank mandate or a payment-disconnection record. Its named adopters and volume claims were not independently corroborated here. The full body was read; retained Article metadata dates publication26February2026 and modification27February2026.\n\n## What this establishes and what would change the conclusion\n\nThe documented architecture permits institutional contributions and differentiated access while preserving platform policy judgments. It includes a described withdrawal channel and a named recipient account of honoring withdrawal states. There is no basis here for claiming all withdrawal requests fail, all recipients obey an automatic command, or banks require this particular product. The most useful missing record remains a current signed data-sharing agreement with its permitted-purpose and correction provisions, followed by a public implementation/audit trace. Wider operator resources and governance are in the sibling finance lane.\n\nCustody: partners-captures.json records eight successful HTML originals, four original administrative JPGs, one403 error and two PDF timeouts. HTML text derivatives are separate. Complete substantive reads: join/programme/approved, all partner terms/schedule, PhotoDNA2024, Google2025 and FSC2026; scoped SWGfL partner privacy; all four diagrams visually. Reader-only: full Microsoft2024 body; full16-page API text; eSafety cover/date, report-period/limitations passages and Table3 Snap row. Other eSafety pages/search snippets are not a whole-report reading. The one malformed discovery query is excluded; eight other focused queries were used. A direct agreement query located no separate executed document within this finite search. Sources retain their own dates and claims. No registration form, case-status service, API, private dataset, outreach or paid action was used. Acquisition stopped for review and forest.\n",
        "file": "research/stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-partner-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority",
        "title": "StopNCII public-user authority: entry, withdrawal and continuing platform decisions",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed. This packet covers the public-user route; it does not claim that this is the only operational route by which entries reach the database. Root separately owns partner terms, the newly discovered public API reference and named operating accounts. No live case, form, credentials, hash value or media was accessed.",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed. This packet covers the public-user route; it does not claim that this is the only operational route by which entries reach the database. Root separately owns partner terms, the newly discovered public API reference and named operating accounts. No live case, form, credentials, hash value or media was accessed.</p>\n<p>The significant boundary is between withdrawing a supplied signal and reversing what another organization decided after receiving it. The user documents explicitly address the first; they preserve room for independent platform policy enforcement rather than promising restoration.</p>\n<h2 id=\"entry-selection-and-review\">Entry selection and review</h2>\n<p>The [FAQ](http[local research file] requires the submitter to be depicted, possess the intimate material and be adult (its wording is “over 18” in the image); submission on another person&#x27;s behalf is refused in this public-user path. It includes depicted-person synthetic images. Status updates may take 3–5 days. Adding further images requires a new case; withdrawal removes the whole case. Losing the case number or password prevents checking or withdrawal, and the FAQ offers no recovery. These are published eligibility and support rules, not evidence of independently verified identity or a legal adjudication of each item. Locators: eligibility questions; synthetic-image, status, adding-images, credential-loss and withdrawal answers.</p>\n<p>The [six-step explanation](http[local research file] says the user selects media and generates the hash on their device; the original does not leave that device. Platforms match against their systems and remove matching material if it violates their intimate-image-abuse policies. That conditional policy assessment is a separate decision from the user&#x27;s selection and submission. The explanation does not establish that every match causes removal. All six steps were read; no workflow was run.</p>\n<h2 id=\"sharing-permission-and-hash-withdrawal\">Sharing permission and hash withdrawal</h2>\n<p>The [StopNCII privacy notice](http[local research file] visibly last updated January 2026, says hashes go to all current and future participating platforms; users cannot choose recipients. The notice identifies SWGfL as controller and describes international sharing. Its “Data retention and security” section requires valid case credentials for withdrawal and promises erasure from SWGfL systems plus instructions to industry partners to erase. It simultaneously preserves partners&#x27; ability to continue removing content that violates their policies. The summary uses “ask”; the full notice uses “instruct”. Neither wording proves delivery, compliance or restoration.</p>\n<p>The notice separately describes personal-data access, rectification, erasure and objection rights, subject to exceptions, and a privacy complaint route followed by ICO escalation if unresolved. These general rights are not evidence of a working credential-recovery path or an adjudicated appeal against a platform&#x27;s moderation. It says case numbers and hashed passwords remain while a case is active; this does not establish storage of plaintext passwords. Locators: Parts 1–2, “Who we share your data with”, “Data retention and security”, “Your Rights” and “Complaints”.</p>\n<p>The [SWGfL privacy policy](http[local research file] visibly updated May 2026, repeats the erasure/instruction promise and continuing-removal reservation in its StopNCII section. Its recipient sentence mentions platforms signed up at upload; the more specific StopNCII notice and FAQ expressly cover future partners too. The general policy&#x27;s rectification/erasure/consent sections describe conditional data rights and normally a one-month response to rights requests. They do not specify a recipient hash-deletion acknowledgement or a platform restoration procedure. Read locators: StopNCII section; general “Your Rights”. The shared original was reused, not reacquired.</p>\n<p>An express right to keep removing offending content should not be silently converted into permission to retain the withdrawn StopNCII reference unchanged. Conversely, an instruction to erase a reference should not be converted into a promise to restore previously removed content or an affected account. The user documents read here provide neither a worked withdrawal trace nor a recipient acknowledgement deadline. The separate API/partner lane may refine those operational duties; this is not a programme-wide finding that no such protocol exists.</p>\n<h2 id=\"which-terms-govern-what\">Which terms govern what</h2>\n<p>The StopNCII privacy notice incorporates [SWGfL Website Terms of Use](http[local research file] that page expressly lists StopNCII among its sites. These are general website terms, including temporary service access, amendment/suspension rights, truthful registration information and possible registration termination for noncompliance. Its registration clause sets an adult age requirement. It points processing questions to privacy policies and acknowledges additional policies. The entire substantive page was read; no displayed revision date was identified. An original GET timed out; the successful reader extraction is retained instead. These general terms do not supply the separate partner data-sharing agreement or proof of a named user&#x27;s termination.</p>\n<p>One technical-description qualification is necessary: the FAQ collectively calls PDQ/PhotoDNA/MD5 “open-sourced”. That sentence is preserved as publisher wording, not adopted as a verified PhotoDNA licence finding; the earlier Microsoft licensing packet establishes why software and service permissions must be examined separately. No new algorithm or code audit was attempted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"remaining-discriminator-and-custody\">Remaining discriminator and custody</h2>\n<p>The useful next record is a public, non-personal specification or worked audit connecting a case withdrawal to recipient delta processing, deletion acknowledgement and any separately retained policy basis for later enforcement. A user privacy request, withdrawal instruction and reversal of an enforcement action are different records. No individual case is needed to establish the governing schema, but none was sought here.</p>\n<p><code>user-captures.json</code> records exact URLs, observation times, scopes and hashes. Three original HTML pages were captured here: FAQ, StopNCII privacy and how-it-works. Root&#x27;s SWGfL privacy original is shared with its exact hash. All four originals pass local hash checks. <code>user-website-terms.reader.json</code> identifies a reader extraction only, not original HTML. The ordinary timeout route is closed. Full substantive reader scopes and narrower retained-text checks are distinguished in the manifest. Two focused searches were used; the indexed creation form was not opened or used. Public API details, partner admission, operator funding and actual platform accounts remain in sibling lanes. No further acquisition is pending in this lane.</p>",
        "path": "stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09/user-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w28-access-s-stop-faq",
          "w28-access-s-stop-privacy",
          "w28-access-s-stop-how"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. Acquisition closed. This packet covers the public-user route; it does not claim that this is the only operational route by which entries reach the database. Root separately owns partner terms, the newly discovered public API reference and named operating accounts. No live case, form, credentials, hash value or media was accessed.\n\nThe significant boundary is between withdrawing a supplied signal and reversing what another organization decided after receiving it. The user documents explicitly address the first; they preserve room for independent platform policy enforcement rather than promising restoration.\n\n## Entry selection and review\n\nThe FAQ (see source references) requires the submitter to be depicted, possess the intimate material and be adult (its wording is “over 18” in the image); submission on another person's behalf is refused in this public-user path. It includes depicted-person synthetic images. Status updates may take 3–5 days. Adding further images requires a new case; withdrawal removes the whole case. Losing the case number or password prevents checking or withdrawal, and the FAQ offers no recovery. These are published eligibility and support rules, not evidence of independently verified identity or a legal adjudication of each item. Locators: eligibility questions; synthetic-image, status, adding-images, credential-loss and withdrawal answers.\n\nThe six-step explanation (see source references) says the user selects media and generates the hash on their device; the original does not leave that device. Platforms match against their systems and remove matching material if it violates their intimate-image-abuse policies. That conditional policy assessment is a separate decision from the user's selection and submission. The explanation does not establish that every match causes removal. All six steps were read; no workflow was run.\n\n## Sharing permission and hash withdrawal\n\nThe StopNCII privacy notice (see source references) visibly last updated January 2026, says hashes go to all current and future participating platforms; users cannot choose recipients. The notice identifies SWGfL as controller and describes international sharing. Its “Data retention and security” section requires valid case credentials for withdrawal and promises erasure from SWGfL systems plus instructions to industry partners to erase. It simultaneously preserves partners' ability to continue removing content that violates their policies. The summary uses “ask”; the full notice uses “instruct”. Neither wording proves delivery, compliance or restoration.\n\nThe notice separately describes personal-data access, rectification, erasure and objection rights, subject to exceptions, and a privacy complaint route followed by ICO escalation if unresolved. These general rights are not evidence of a working credential-recovery path or an adjudicated appeal against a platform's moderation. It says case numbers and hashed passwords remain while a case is active; this does not establish storage of plaintext passwords. Locators: Parts 1–2, “Who we share your data with”, “Data retention and security”, “Your Rights” and “Complaints”.\n\nThe SWGfL privacy policy (see source references) visibly updated May 2026, repeats the erasure/instruction promise and continuing-removal reservation in its StopNCII section. Its recipient sentence mentions platforms signed up at upload; the more specific StopNCII notice and FAQ expressly cover future partners too. The general policy's rectification/erasure/consent sections describe conditional data rights and normally a one-month response to rights requests. They do not specify a recipient hash-deletion acknowledgement or a platform restoration procedure. Read locators: StopNCII section; general “Your Rights”. The shared original was reused, not reacquired.\n\nAn express right to keep removing offending content should not be silently converted into permission to retain the withdrawn StopNCII reference unchanged. Conversely, an instruction to erase a reference should not be converted into a promise to restore previously removed content or an affected account. The user documents read here provide neither a worked withdrawal trace nor a recipient acknowledgement deadline. The separate API/partner lane may refine those operational duties; this is not a programme-wide finding that no such protocol exists.\n\n## Which terms govern what\n\nThe StopNCII privacy notice incorporates SWGfL Website Terms of Use (see source references) that page expressly lists StopNCII among its sites. These are general website terms, including temporary service access, amendment/suspension rights, truthful registration information and possible registration termination for noncompliance. Its registration clause sets an adult age requirement. It points processing questions to privacy policies and acknowledges additional policies. The entire substantive page was read; no displayed revision date was identified. An original GET timed out; the successful reader extraction is retained instead. These general terms do not supply the separate partner data-sharing agreement or proof of a named user's termination.\n\nOne technical-description qualification is necessary: the FAQ collectively calls PDQ/PhotoDNA/MD5 “open-sourced”. That sentence is preserved as publisher wording, not adopted as a verified PhotoDNA licence finding; the earlier Microsoft licensing packet establishes why software and service permissions must be examined separately. No new algorithm or code audit was attempted.\n\n## Remaining discriminator and custody\n\nThe useful next record is a public, non-personal specification or worked audit connecting a case withdrawal to recipient delta processing, deletion acknowledgement and any separately retained policy basis for later enforcement. A user privacy request, withdrawal instruction and reversal of an enforcement action are different records. No individual case is needed to establish the governing schema, but none was sought here.\n\n`user-captures.json` records exact URLs, observation times, scopes and hashes. Three original HTML pages were captured here: FAQ, StopNCII privacy and how-it-works. Root's SWGfL privacy original is shared with its exact hash. All four originals pass local hash checks. `user-website-terms.reader.json` identifies a reader extraction only, not original HTML. The ordinary timeout route is closed. Full substantive reader scopes and narrower retained-text checks are distinguished in the manifest. Two focused searches were used; the indexed creation form was not opened or used. Public API details, partner admission, operator funding and actual platform accounts remain in sibling lanes. No further acquisition is pending in this lane.\n",
        "file": "research/stopncii-governance-wave-2026-09-09-user-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform",
        "title": "Supplier identity, purchased analysis and the government data platform",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root completed this bounded acquisition after the instruction forest. No outreach. This packet is not yet integrated into case-r20. Original captures and failures are recorded in captures.json. Public-page statements, contract terms, expenditure and performed outcomes are distinct evidence states.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root completed this bounded acquisition after the instruction forest. No outreach. This packet is not yet integrated into case-r20. Original captures and failures are recorded in captures.json. Public-page statements, contract terms, expenditure and performed outcomes are distinct evidence states.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-present-analysis-supplier\">The present analysis supplier</h2>\n<p>Companies House identifies THE GLOBAL STRATEGY NETWORK LTD, company 10433562, incorporated 18 October 2016 and currently active. Its public PSC register records Giles Henry Donne Barrett and Matthew Thomas King each with more than 25% and not more than 50% of shares and voting rights, notified respectively 24 June 2021 and 28 October 2020. Richard Barrett&#x27;s PSC status ceased 24 June 2021. These bands do not establish an exact half-share each, a family relationship, or Richard&#x27;s current control. Personal addresses and birth information were not extracted into the case.</p>\n<p>Sources: http[local research file] and http[local research file] (direct primary reader).</p>\n<p>The current NSOIT privacy notice names Global Strategy Network as its appointed public-social-media analysis contractor following an open tender. Its page&#x27;s initial publication date does not date the appointment paragraph. The retained privacy capture belongs to the preceding instruction packet. This does not prove Crisp&#x27;s exact exit date or that the two suppliers never worked in parallel.</p>\n<p>The 27 January 2026 ministerial answer to question 106529 separates two functions: GSN provides analysis of online misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security; Faculty Science develops the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform (CDDP). The question itself misspells the supplier names; the answer is the attribution anchor. This is an official role account, not a technical or effectiveness audit.</p>\n<p>Source: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>DSIT&#x27;s September 2025 spending CSV records a payment of GBP 118,000 on 12 September 2025 to The Global Strategy Network Ltd, transaction 719926. Expense: Consultancy Expenditure; area: Security and Online Harms; description: SOH Info Threats and Security Programme. The original CSV has blank contract/project/expenditure-type fields, rendered as Not set in the HTML preview. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or demonstrated invoice scope. VAT basis and service period are not provided. The supplier is named, without a company number in the row; association to the registered company is a name match supported by official supplier naming, not a registry identifier in this payment.</p>\n<p>Original: http[local research file] ; 67,256 bytes; SHA256 2a1765cbb3b334406fd8f8def9897474684520222b909ab9f58d9fe61c39edcc. Captured 9 September 2026. Preview updated 30 July 2026: http[local research file] . Retained HTML SHA256 c04fb5c8ef1af21ed50ffb1d3803ed251fe5a1770d916e16b5d512933a35931f.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-separate-government-directed-technical-platform\">A separate government-directed technical platform</h2>\n<p>A government procurement page for CDDP development, hosting and maintenance dates stage-one publication to 11 September 2023 and closing to 25 September 2023. Its stated team locates prioritisation in DSIT: a product manager owns sprint priorities/user research, a programme manager leads strategy, and analysts test as expert users. Proposed working arrangements put sprint goals with DSIT, alongside a prioritised backlog and quarterly strategic workshops. The technical supplier would support the government team using, evaluating and directing the platform, manage AWS hosting, and develop/maintain prototypes. Users are expressly within HMG. These are tender requirements, not proof that every practice occurred.</p>\n<p>The page identifies Faculty as incumbent in extended Alpha, describes a March 2024 contract end and procurement for transition. It also gives an October 2023 latest start, residual BEIS branding and test placeholders: preserve those inconsistencies and do not silently normalize the page into an executed contract. Publication records 19 applications; the separate assessment section proposes evaluating five suppliers. Neither is an award result. Stage-two suppliers would sign an NDA before receiving the complete ITT. The listed indicative budget is 500,000–920,000, with a one-year length, six-month extension and six-month break clause; do not aggregate it with contract variations or treat it as expenditure. The dated January 2026 answer still names Faculty, so an actual supplier replacement is not established.</p>\n<p>Source: http[local research file] . Read context, working arrangements, technical scope, assessment and timeline. Procurement-source wording is not a direct CDDP product inspection.</p>\n<h2 id=\"original-contracts-released-under-foi\">Original contracts released under FOI</h2>\n<p>The official FOI response inventories withheld Discovery Report and Product Operating Model alongside partly disclosed business-case and contract records, including an expert-evaluation procurement, Oliver Wyman evaluation contract, Faculty variations and NewsWhip contract. Its inventory is not equivalent to reading all of those documents.</p>\n<p>Release: http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Retained original: http[local research file] ; 262 PDF pages, 11,778,384 bytes; SHA256 71bd6a522a765d53f9aa79b239134226be64891ea3c67711abc9d788fb87748f. The release path says 2024 while the original filename says 2023; retain both. A full text derivative exists, but only the following pages/passages were substantively inspected in this run. Page numbers below are one-based PDF pages, not always printed pagination.</p>\n<p>Pages 1–2: October 2021 Shared Outcomes Fund business case, DCMS Security and Online Harms, SRO Sarah Connolly; the opening description envisages cross-government data sharing and a common picture of online information threats, with Discovery and Delivery phases. It explicitly includes misinformation, disinformation and manipulative behaviour. Redacted/unreadable participating-department and value fields are not reconstructed. Page 17 begins critical-success criteria; the following detailed evaluation section is reserved for the next run.</p>\n<p>Pages 101–102: Faculty variation 102548 No.2, dated 16 August 2023, effective 17 March 2023, extends to 31 March 2024 with capped fee GBP 510,000 excluding VAT and stated revised total GBP 2,373,873. It coordinates IP terms across the G-Cloud and this call-off, retrospectively and prospectively. Independent visual review confirms this disclosed copy has visibly uncompleted signature, name, title and date fields; execution is not established from this copy.</p>\n<p>Pages 110–112, Appendix C: the parties vary the arrangements so new IP and specially written software shall be supplier-owned and licensed to the buyer under a perpetual licence, not assigned. This does not imply that the earlier ownership allocation was already identical. Permitted third parties can use, adapt and modify the retained IP to supply maintenance, hosting and development to the buyer. They cannot exploit it commercially for other purposes or build a competing commercial product from it. They need no direct agreement with the supplier. The buyer must investigate evidenced misuse and, in sustained breach, terminate the applicable sublicense, subject to procurement rules. Source code and relevant documentation must be accessible and usable to the buyer and its contractors. This splits intellectual-property ownership from technical direction and replacement rights. It does not establish that an accessible repository was actually delivered, that independent maintenance succeeded, or that Faculty dictated the government&#x27;s policy.</p>\n<p>Page 114 identifies Faculty Science Limited, registration 08873131, in order 102548. Page 133 contains the 16 February 2022 variation and GBP 250,000 excluding VAT, with a design document and proof-of-concept report among deliverables. Some surrounding deliverable detail is not readable. Page 135, variation 102887 No.1 dated 13 December 2022, says milestone-two MVP completed 30 September 2022 and revises the cap from GBP 1,264,650 to GBP 1,514,650. Page 137, No.2 dated 1 March 2023/effective 16 January, adds GBP 400,000 excluding VAT payable against delivery/buyer acceptance and prints total GBP 1,944,650. That is GBP 30,000 above a simple addition to the previous stated total; intervening terms/reconciliation remain uninspected. No combined-spend total, fraud inference or silent correction is appropriate.</p>\n<p>Page 143 identifies NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration 485016, contract 103186 for real-time social/predictive media news monitoring intelligence, 28 October 2022–27 October 2023 with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge read. Pages 193–194 contain programme-success and milestone tables with almost no recoverable substantive cells; visual examination is needed before attributing absent text to redaction rather than extraction failure. Pages 109 and 112 mostly blank; page 113 is the next framework cover. The expert-evaluation material was located by text search on pages 34–35, 62–63, 89, 92 and 95 but is not yet substantively read.</p>\n<h2 id=\"gaps-retained-as-specific-leads\">Gaps retained as specific leads</h2>\n<p>The actual partly disclosed Crisp report for the week beginning 24 June 2024 was not located through targeted public searches using the ICO decision, release date and period. This is not proof that no public copy exists. The ICO independently confirms its existence and partial disclosure; no matched referral/removal result was found.</p>\n<p>The exact GSN SOW, performance criteria and invoice behind transaction 719926 remain missing. Current appointment, January 2026 official role description and September 2025 payment do not fix the Crisp/GSN handover date. An official 18 November 2025 answer 88698 contains four contract links in the daily parliamentary PDF; the public reader exposed the labels, not underlying URLs. The ordinary PDF download returned 403 and the route is closed. The individual question page may be a later legitimate route if located; do not invent its date.</p>\n<p>A later Faculty call-off attachment was indexed, but reader/download failed. Its indexed registration field reads 438780, unlike the acquired earlier contract&#x27;s 08873131. Do not promote that indexed cover into an executed award. The precise failed attachment and attempts are in captures.json; no retries.</p>\n<p>Companies House search also surfaced Extrac AI Limited 14532778 with historical GSN corporate control and later personal PSCs. This is an unpromoted lead, not a demonstrated NSOIT supplier, deployed system or inference that all operations belonged to one company. Relevance should be tested before expanding biographies.</p>\n<p>The next revealing evidence is ordinary project governance: evaluation commission and resulting assessment, measurable acceptance criteria, and whether the licenced code/replacement rights were actually exercised. The retained bundle makes that a bounded next run rather than speculative searching.</p>",
        "path": "supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09/supplier-platform.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-register",
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-psc",
          "w16-supp-s-roles2026",
          "w16-supp-s-gsn-payment",
          "w16-supp-s-procurement2023",
          "w16-supp-s-contract-links-unavailable",
          "w16-supp-s-later-faculty-unavailable"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root completed this bounded acquisition after the instruction forest. No outreach. This packet is not yet integrated into case-r20. Original captures and failures are recorded in captures.json. Public-page statements, contract terms, expenditure and performed outcomes are distinct evidence states.\n\n## The present analysis supplier\n\nCompanies House identifies THE GLOBAL STRATEGY NETWORK LTD, company 10433562, incorporated 18 October 2016 and currently active. Its public PSC register records Giles Henry Donne Barrett and Matthew Thomas King each with more than 25% and not more than 50% of shares and voting rights, notified respectively 24 June 2021 and 28 October 2020. Richard Barrett's PSC status ceased 24 June 2021. These bands do not establish an exact half-share each, a family relationship, or Richard's current control. Personal addresses and birth information were not extracted into the case.\n\nSources: http[local research file] and http[local research file] (direct primary reader).\n\nThe current NSOIT privacy notice names Global Strategy Network as its appointed public-social-media analysis contractor following an open tender. Its page's initial publication date does not date the appointment paragraph. The retained privacy capture belongs to the preceding instruction packet. This does not prove Crisp's exact exit date or that the two suppliers never worked in parallel.\n\nThe 27 January 2026 ministerial answer to question 106529 separates two functions: GSN provides analysis of online misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security; Faculty Science develops the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform (CDDP). The question itself misspells the supplier names; the answer is the attribution anchor. This is an official role account, not a technical or effectiveness audit.\n\nSource: http[local research file]\n\nDSIT's September 2025 spending CSV records a payment of GBP 118,000 on 12 September 2025 to The Global Strategy Network Ltd, transaction 719926. Expense: Consultancy Expenditure; area: Security and Online Harms; description: SOH Info Threats and Security Programme. The original CSV has blank contract/project/expenditure-type fields, rendered as Not set in the HTML preview. This is one payment, not a contract ceiling, annual budget or demonstrated invoice scope. VAT basis and service period are not provided. The supplier is named, without a company number in the row; association to the registered company is a name match supported by official supplier naming, not a registry identifier in this payment.\n\nOriginal: http[local research file] ; 67,256 bytes; SHA256 2a1765cbb3b334406fd8f8def9897474684520222b909ab9f58d9fe61c39edcc. Captured 9 September 2026. Preview updated 30 July 2026: http[local research file] . Retained HTML SHA256 c04fb5c8ef1af21ed50ffb1d3803ed251fe5a1770d916e16b5d512933a35931f.\n\n## A separate government-directed technical platform\n\nA government procurement page for CDDP development, hosting and maintenance dates stage-one publication to 11 September 2023 and closing to 25 September 2023. Its stated team locates prioritisation in DSIT: a product manager owns sprint priorities/user research, a programme manager leads strategy, and analysts test as expert users. Proposed working arrangements put sprint goals with DSIT, alongside a prioritised backlog and quarterly strategic workshops. The technical supplier would support the government team using, evaluating and directing the platform, manage AWS hosting, and develop/maintain prototypes. Users are expressly within HMG. These are tender requirements, not proof that every practice occurred.\n\nThe page identifies Faculty as incumbent in extended Alpha, describes a March 2024 contract end and procurement for transition. It also gives an October 2023 latest start, residual BEIS branding and test placeholders: preserve those inconsistencies and do not silently normalize the page into an executed contract. Publication records 19 applications; the separate assessment section proposes evaluating five suppliers. Neither is an award result. Stage-two suppliers would sign an NDA before receiving the complete ITT. The listed indicative budget is 500,000–920,000, with a one-year length, six-month extension and six-month break clause; do not aggregate it with contract variations or treat it as expenditure. The dated January 2026 answer still names Faculty, so an actual supplier replacement is not established.\n\nSource: http[local research file] . Read context, working arrangements, technical scope, assessment and timeline. Procurement-source wording is not a direct CDDP product inspection.\n\n## Original contracts released under FOI\n\nThe official FOI response inventories withheld Discovery Report and Product Operating Model alongside partly disclosed business-case and contract records, including an expert-evaluation procurement, Oliver Wyman evaluation contract, Faculty variations and NewsWhip contract. Its inventory is not equivalent to reading all of those documents.\n\nRelease: http[local research file]\n\nRetained original: http[local research file] ; 262 PDF pages, 11,778,384 bytes; SHA256 71bd6a522a765d53f9aa79b239134226be64891ea3c67711abc9d788fb87748f. The release path says 2024 while the original filename says 2023; retain both. A full text derivative exists, but only the following pages/passages were substantively inspected in this run. Page numbers below are one-based PDF pages, not always printed pagination.\n\nPages 1–2: October 2021 Shared Outcomes Fund business case, DCMS Security and Online Harms, SRO Sarah Connolly; the opening description envisages cross-government data sharing and a common picture of online information threats, with Discovery and Delivery phases. It explicitly includes misinformation, disinformation and manipulative behaviour. Redacted/unreadable participating-department and value fields are not reconstructed. Page 17 begins critical-success criteria; the following detailed evaluation section is reserved for the next run.\n\nPages 101–102: Faculty variation 102548 No.2, dated 16 August 2023, effective 17 March 2023, extends to 31 March 2024 with capped fee GBP 510,000 excluding VAT and stated revised total GBP 2,373,873. It coordinates IP terms across the G-Cloud and this call-off, retrospectively and prospectively. Independent visual review confirms this disclosed copy has visibly uncompleted signature, name, title and date fields; execution is not established from this copy.\n\nPages 110–112, Appendix C: the parties vary the arrangements so new IP and specially written software shall be supplier-owned and licensed to the buyer under a perpetual licence, not assigned. This does not imply that the earlier ownership allocation was already identical. Permitted third parties can use, adapt and modify the retained IP to supply maintenance, hosting and development to the buyer. They cannot exploit it commercially for other purposes or build a competing commercial product from it. They need no direct agreement with the supplier. The buyer must investigate evidenced misuse and, in sustained breach, terminate the applicable sublicense, subject to procurement rules. Source code and relevant documentation must be accessible and usable to the buyer and its contractors. This splits intellectual-property ownership from technical direction and replacement rights. It does not establish that an accessible repository was actually delivered, that independent maintenance succeeded, or that Faculty dictated the government's policy.\n\nPage 114 identifies Faculty Science Limited, registration 08873131, in order 102548. Page 133 contains the 16 February 2022 variation and GBP 250,000 excluding VAT, with a design document and proof-of-concept report among deliverables. Some surrounding deliverable detail is not readable. Page 135, variation 102887 No.1 dated 13 December 2022, says milestone-two MVP completed 30 September 2022 and revises the cap from GBP 1,264,650 to GBP 1,514,650. Page 137, No.2 dated 1 March 2023/effective 16 January, adds GBP 400,000 excluding VAT payable against delivery/buyer acceptance and prints total GBP 1,944,650. That is GBP 30,000 above a simple addition to the previous stated total; intervening terms/reconciliation remain uninspected. No combined-spend total, fraud inference or silent correction is appropriate.\n\nPage 143 identifies NewsWhip Media Limited, Irish registration 485016, contract 103186 for real-time social/predictive media news monitoring intelligence, 28 October 2022–27 October 2023 with an optional one-year buyer extension. No charge read. Pages 193–194 contain programme-success and milestone tables with almost no recoverable substantive cells; visual examination is needed before attributing absent text to redaction rather than extraction failure. Pages 109 and 112 mostly blank; page 113 is the next framework cover. The expert-evaluation material was located by text search on pages 34–35, 62–63, 89, 92 and 95 but is not yet substantively read.\n\n## Gaps retained as specific leads\n\nThe actual partly disclosed Crisp report for the week beginning 24 June 2024 was not located through targeted public searches using the ICO decision, release date and period. This is not proof that no public copy exists. The ICO independently confirms its existence and partial disclosure; no matched referral/removal result was found.\n\nThe exact GSN SOW, performance criteria and invoice behind transaction 719926 remain missing. Current appointment, January 2026 official role description and September 2025 payment do not fix the Crisp/GSN handover date. An official 18 November 2025 answer 88698 contains four contract links in the daily parliamentary PDF; the public reader exposed the labels, not underlying URLs. The ordinary PDF download returned 403 and the route is closed. The individual question page may be a later legitimate route if located; do not invent its date.\n\nA later Faculty call-off attachment was indexed, but reader/download failed. Its indexed registration field reads 438780, unlike the acquired earlier contract's 08873131. Do not promote that indexed cover into an executed award. The precise failed attachment and attempts are in captures.json; no retries.\n\nCompanies House search also surfaced Extrac AI Limited 14532778 with historical GSN corporate control and later personal PSCs. This is an unpromoted lead, not a demonstrated NSOIT supplier, deployed system or inference that all operations belonged to one company. Relevance should be tested before expanding biographies.\n\nThe next revealing evidence is ordinary project governance: evaluation commission and resulting assessment, measurable acceptance criteria, and whether the licenced code/replacement rights were actually exercised. The retained bundle makes that a bounded next run rather than speculative searching.\n",
        "file": "research/supplier-platform-wave-2026-09-09-supplier-platform.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories",
        "title": "From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories",
        "description": "Bounded taxonomy comparison, 9 September 2026, after the recorded forest assessment. This note compares express source use with legal choices; the September 2026 document remains an exposure draft. It does not establish that WEF, HRLC or Reset controls Australian drafting or enforcement.",
        "html": "<p>Bounded taxonomy comparison, 9 September 2026, after the recorded forest assessment. This note compares express source use with legal choices; the September 2026 document remains an exposure draft. It does not establish that WEF, HRLC or Reset controls Australian drafting or enforcement.</p>\n<p>The strongest new finding is an <strong>independent official route for the WEF vocabulary before HRLC&#x27;s submission</strong>. The government&#x27;s April 2024 review issues paper already cited the typology. HRLC therefore cannot be treated as the sole intermediary. Independent official route here means an official citation before that HRLC submission; it does not establish causal independence from all advocates, earlier relationships or shared workstreams. The strongest narrowing is the published review&#x27;s decision to defer a broader consolidation of financial, societal and misinformation harms. The draft has a materially different structure from the typology. Neither conceptual overlap nor omission of a label, by itself, resolves the draft&#x27;s complete reach.</p>\n<h2 id=\"express-transmission-and-its-limits\">Express transmission and its limits</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Record</th>\n<th>What the inspected passage establishes</th>\n<th>What it does not establish</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>April 2024 government review issues paper</td>\n<td>Part 3, Overview of online harm, fn17, uses WEF&#x27;s account of content, contact and conduct and their effects. The technology-facilitated-abuse discussion cites WEF p8 at fn88; the gender-based-violence discussion does so at fn93.</td>\n<td>The references inform the issues paper&#x27;s descriptions. They are not legislative incorporation or a completed response to later NGO proposals.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>HRLC submission155, July 2024</td>\n<td>Section 4.3, printed/PDF p9, expressly adopts the WEF framework. Section 5, p10, adopts Reset&#x27;s five-pillar architecture. Section 5.1.5, p12, proposes complaint/redress categories including misinformation.</td>\n<td>HRLC&#x27;s advocacy position is not a government decision; a taxonomy reference does not itself prescribe a ban or particular intervention.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Current eSafety Safety by Design guidance</td>\n<td>Under “The types of online harms,” explicitly uses the WEF typology for overlapping categories. The page displays last updated 06/03/2026.</td>\n<td>This is industry guidance, not the exposure draft&#x27;s definitions or a binding legislative instrument. The update is not an established original publication date.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Sources: [Government issues paper, Part 3/fn17 and later fn88/93](http[local research file] [HRLC155, §§4.3–5.1.5](http[local research file] [eSafety guidance, types of online harms](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The separate [producer packet]([local research file] establishes the workstream and contextual limits from its inspected sources. Its original WEF PDF was not acquired; detailed counterpart definitions must retain the Resolver/explainer attribution. Do not promote that packet into a claim that every cell of the original matrix was visually inspected. This lane adds actual government-side use to the production/NGO path; it does not establish who selected the later statutory clauses.</p>\n<h2 id=\"resets-broader-model-and-the-reviews-narrower-choice\">Reset&#x27;s broader model and the review&#x27;s narrower choice</h2>\n<p>Reset&#x27;s April 2024 Green Paper describes its own proposals as a moment-specific contribution to discussion. Printed p6 explains its focus on online safety and misinformation/disinformation. The five-pillar table, printed p7/PDF9, distinguishes duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability. Its proposed assessments encompass existing Australian content/abuse categories, scams, electoral processes, public security, rights, public health and environmental risks. It expressly draws comparisons with the EU DSA, UK OSA and proposed Canadian legislation; its commentary criticises plural duties for weakening a systemic focus. This is a documented set of proposed policy choices with identified antecedents, not a WEF-only derivation. [Reset Green Paper, cover/about and printed pp6–7](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>In the published updated statutory review, recommendation 5, printed p56, proposes broad families concerning young people, mental/physical wellbeing, harmful practices, national security/social cohesion and other illegality. Its adjoining discussion says broader financial, societal and misinformation harms fit a duty model but are handled by other existing or proposed Australian legislation and regulators. It leaves possible consolidation under an expanded commission to a future review because the current reform is already substantial. This is a deliberate scope choice. It is <strong>not</strong> a named rejection of WEF or a finding those harms are imaginary. Printed p12 also frames risk assessment through EU/UK models and existing Australian industry codes. [Published review, printed pp12 and 56](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The government&#x27;s April 2026 response supports recommendation 4 and supports recommendation 5 <strong>in principle</strong>. Its explanation defines that state as support for intent/merit with alternative delivery or further implementation consideration; it is not acceptance of every proposed term. For recommendation 5 it stresses vulnerable people, criminal activity and public safety alongside expression, and says the duty complements the Criminal Code without changing obligations under existing discrimination statutes. It separately declines to simply lower adult-abuse thresholds, citing operational costs and the distinction between systemic prevention and reactive schemes. [Government response, PDF/printed pp3–6, recommendations 4–5 and adult-abuse discussion](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-consequential-report-version-qualification\">A consequential report-version qualification</h2>\n<p>FOI25-247 Document 1, MS24-002100, is a departmental brief seeking acceptance of an updated final report. It records that Rickard sought final improvements at a <strong>1 November 2024 meeting</strong>, after delivery on <strong>31 October</strong>. Assistant Secretary <strong>Andrew Irwin</strong> cleared the brief on <strong>8 November</strong>. Attachment C, PDF7, reports five additions and <strong>68 total recommendations</strong>, with four characterized as already in the text but not called out; it lists new recommendation 5. Its introductory fifth item describes a daily penalty for non-compliance with a duty action, while item g/new recommendation35 describes a <strong>$10m company maximum for removal-notice non-compliance</strong> and says this was not previously addressed. These descriptions are inconsistent. The later government response says the published review has <strong>67 recommendations</strong>. No original total, deleted recommendation or final numbering is reconstructed by subtraction. PDF8 records a terminology-order change placing mental before physical wellbeing. The department describes changes as consistent with the delivered report and not changing findings; this is its characterization, not an acquired complete version comparison.</p>\n<p>This establishes a post-delivery recommendation call-out and editorial revision. It does not establish that the substantive harm analysis originated in November, identify the individual drafter of recommendation 5, or show that the minister authored it. The readable approval alternatives/date fields are not proof of executed ministerial acceptance. Use <strong>published updated review</strong>, and distinguish original delivery from revision, rather than silently dating every public-page formulation to 31 October. [FOI25-247, Document 1 PDF1–3 and Attachment C PDF7–8](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"operative-comparison-initial-categories-future-additions-and-adult-choice\">Operative comparison: initial categories, future additions and adult choice</h2>\n<p>The exposure draft&#x27;s distinctions are consequential:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Provision</th>\n<th>Scope to preserve</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>§§25B–D, printed pp26–29</td>\n<td>Separate serious-harm protection, additional child protection and under-16 social-media feature obligations. Initial lists include targeted harassment, terrorism and harmful practices; no general misinformation/democracy category is named.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>§§25C(2), 25D(2), 27B</td>\n<td>Minister-added categories require potential serious harm, or potential harm to children respectively; the minister must seek and consider eSafety advice. The child addition test does not expressly require seriousness.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>§§25E, 26A</td>\n<td>Non-user and combined harms count. Assessment covers all reasonably foreseeable risks, including those relevant to the duty. Label absence does not settle every assessment obligation.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>§§25F–G</td>\n<td>Specified features are deemed to have negative behavioural impacts. Ministerial additions have no express serious-harm threshold in §25G itself.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>§§25H, 26(7)</td>\n<td>Reasonable practicability weighs risk, available measures, cost and reasonable privacy expectations. The exception concerns lawful private communications solely between consenting adults; it does not exempt all lawful adult speech or disable every separate Act power.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are proposed Australian legal mechanisms, not an incorporation of WEF&#x27;s matrix. False information can intersect listed conduct; future additions remain possible. [Exposure draft, §§25B–26A and 27B, printed pp26–34/37, PDF30–38/41](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"earlier-australian-legal-sources-and-competing-explanations\">Earlier Australian legal sources and competing explanations</h2>\n<p>The <strong>as-made 2021 Act</strong> already defined serious physical/mental harm, distinguished serious distress from ordinary emotional reactions, and imposed targeted child/adult abuse tests. Its adult test combined likely intent to cause serious harm with an ordinary-reasonable-person assessment of the material. Sections 8–9 addressed contextual merit/consent and abhorrent violence. Section 106 tied class 1 to the Classification Act 1995 refusal category. These are directly inspected predecessors to the 2023 typology, rather than a presumed earlier neutral vocabulary. They supply a concrete competing source for similarities, while not proving every draft clause was copied from them. [As-made Online Safety Act 2021, §§5–9 and 106](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The April issues paper also discusses Australian research and existing abuse/content schemes beside its WEF references. This is consistent with synthesis from several inputs. The record supports influence through framing and documented advocacy; it does not support an exclusive linear chain in which a private taxonomy became law unchanged. Conversely, the existence of older law and contextual safeguards does not determine how broad future instruments or enforcement would become.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relations-and-remaining-discriminating-record\">Candidate relations and remaining discriminating record</h2>\n<p>Preserve <strong>WEF typology → government April issues paper: cited for descriptive framing</strong>, independently of <strong>WEF typology → HRLC155: expressly adopted framing</strong>. Add <strong>WEF typology → eSafety guidance: explicitly used for educational categorisation</strong>, with the page&#x27;s update-date boundary. Preserve <strong>Reset model → HRLC155: expressly endorsed</strong>, and <strong>review recommendation 5 → government response: supported in principle</strong>. Treat <strong>review taxonomy ↔ draft categories</strong> as a documented comparison unless a clause-level attribution is obtained. None of these is a donor-instruction, private veto or enacted-ban relation.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating record is a <strong>category-by-category policy instruction, consultation disposition or drafting table for §§25C–G</strong>, showing source, alternatives, threshold selection and ministerial clearance. The likely policy custodian is the department&#x27;s online-safety reform team; the relevant record family is the 2025–26 duty-of-care drafting/consultation file, including instructions to legislative drafters. It would distinguish accepted wording from shared vocabulary and establish why broader labels were omitted or particular additions delegated. No such instruction or disposition was acquired here. This lane stops at that record-to-decision breakpoint for the forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"actual-reading-scope-and-access-state\">Actual reading scope and access state</h2>\n<p>All current access observations are 9 September 2026. This note contains scoped public-reader/indexed-primary findings. <strong>No original PDF bytes, screenshots or original-byte hashes were acquired in this lane.</strong> PDF/printed numbering is differentiated where verified. The separate prior authority note supplies a fuller clause discussion, not new visual evidence.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source alias</th>\n<th>Inspected scope / current working references</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-hrlc155</td>\n<td>§4.3 through §5.1.5, printed/PDF pp9–12; reader turn925view0/1 and indexed introductory passage turn926search4. Not every submission page.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-issues2024</td>\n<td>Part 3 overview/fn17; online-hate and technology-facilitated-abuse discussion/fn88/93. Reader turn935view1 and turn937view0/1. Date label April 2024; filename/internal working-title details do not establish a publication day.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-esafety</td>\n<td>Types-of-harms section, following impact paragraphs and displayed update. Reader turn935view2 and turn937view2/3. Current page, no historical revision capture.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-resetgreen</td>\n<td>Cover/about, printed pp1–3 background and pp6–7 systemic proposal/table. Reader turn940view1, turn941view0, turn942view1. Table is extracted text; no visual matrix claim.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-review</td>\n<td>Complete indexed printed p56 recommendation and adjoining scope discussion, plus indexed p12 summary. turn926search0, turn941search12, turn943search12. A reader open returned content-too-large (13,286,332 bytes); no ordinary GET retried. Detailed §5.5 attribution is retained in prior policy-lineage.md, not newly audited here.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-foi247</td>\n<td>Document 1 PDF1–3, Attachment C PDF7–8, and limited draft-letter context PDF9. turn929view0, turn931view1, turn935view0. No inference from blank/alternative approval text to signed decision.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-response</td>\n<td>PDF/printed pp3–6: response-state definitions, recommendations 4–5, related scope and adult-abuse discussion. turn947view0, reusing turn920view0.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-draft</td>\n<td>§§25A–26A and 27B; scoped neighbouring compliance text also returned. turn926view0, turn929view1–3, turn931view0, turn942view2, turn943view1, turn944view0. Public text extraction only; closed normal-GET failures not repeated.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-op-s-osa2021</td>\n<td>Original/as-made ePub §§5–9 and class1 §106. Reached actual dated original through the Register&#x27;s section link: turn944view1, turn946view0–2. The landing table-of-contents alone was not treated as historical substantive text. A December 2024 compilation was also read for comparison, turn931view2/turn935view3.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>No contributor biographies, new donor roster, private accounts, outreach, publication or canonical case edits were added. No inference about unseen draft material or access restrictions follows from these text-only readings.</p>",
        "path": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09/operative-categories.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-issues2024",
          "w14-tax-s-esafety-guidance",
          "w14-tax-s-reset-green",
          "w14-tax-s-act2021"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded taxonomy comparison, 9 September 2026, after the recorded forest assessment. This note compares express source use with legal choices; the September 2026 document remains an exposure draft. It does not establish that WEF, HRLC or Reset controls Australian drafting or enforcement.\n\nThe strongest new finding is an **independent official route for the WEF vocabulary before HRLC's submission**. The government's April 2024 review issues paper already cited the typology. HRLC therefore cannot be treated as the sole intermediary. Independent official route here means an official citation before that HRLC submission; it does not establish causal independence from all advocates, earlier relationships or shared workstreams. The strongest narrowing is the published review's decision to defer a broader consolidation of financial, societal and misinformation harms. The draft has a materially different structure from the typology. Neither conceptual overlap nor omission of a label, by itself, resolves the draft's complete reach.\n\n## Express transmission and its limits\n\n| Record | What the inspected passage establishes | What it does not establish |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| April 2024 government review issues paper | Part 3, Overview of online harm, fn17, uses WEF's account of content, contact and conduct and their effects. The technology-facilitated-abuse discussion cites WEF p8 at fn88; the gender-based-violence discussion does so at fn93. | The references inform the issues paper's descriptions. They are not legislative incorporation or a completed response to later NGO proposals. |\n| HRLC submission155, July 2024 | Section 4.3, printed/PDF p9, expressly adopts the WEF framework. Section 5, p10, adopts Reset's five-pillar architecture. Section 5.1.5, p12, proposes complaint/redress categories including misinformation. | HRLC's advocacy position is not a government decision; a taxonomy reference does not itself prescribe a ban or particular intervention. |\n| Current eSafety Safety by Design guidance | Under “The types of online harms,” explicitly uses the WEF typology for overlapping categories. The page displays last updated 06/03/2026. | This is industry guidance, not the exposure draft's definitions or a binding legislative instrument. The update is not an established original publication date. |\n\nSources: Government issues paper, Part 3/fn17 and later fn88/93 (see source references) HRLC155, §§4.3–5.1.5 (see source references) eSafety guidance, types of online harms (see source references)\n\nThe separate [producer packet]([local research file] establishes the workstream and contextual limits from its inspected sources. Its original WEF PDF was not acquired; detailed counterpart definitions must retain the Resolver/explainer attribution. Do not promote that packet into a claim that every cell of the original matrix was visually inspected. This lane adds actual government-side use to the production/NGO path; it does not establish who selected the later statutory clauses.\n\n## Reset's broader model and the review's narrower choice\n\nReset's April 2024 Green Paper describes its own proposals as a moment-specific contribution to discussion. Printed p6 explains its focus on online safety and misinformation/disinformation. The five-pillar table, printed p7/PDF9, distinguishes duty, assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability. Its proposed assessments encompass existing Australian content/abuse categories, scams, electoral processes, public security, rights, public health and environmental risks. It expressly draws comparisons with the EU DSA, UK OSA and proposed Canadian legislation; its commentary criticises plural duties for weakening a systemic focus. This is a documented set of proposed policy choices with identified antecedents, not a WEF-only derivation. Reset Green Paper, cover/about and printed pp6–7 (see source references)\n\nIn the published updated statutory review, recommendation 5, printed p56, proposes broad families concerning young people, mental/physical wellbeing, harmful practices, national security/social cohesion and other illegality. Its adjoining discussion says broader financial, societal and misinformation harms fit a duty model but are handled by other existing or proposed Australian legislation and regulators. It leaves possible consolidation under an expanded commission to a future review because the current reform is already substantial. This is a deliberate scope choice. It is **not** a named rejection of WEF or a finding those harms are imaginary. Printed p12 also frames risk assessment through EU/UK models and existing Australian industry codes. Published review, printed pp12 and 56 (see source references)\n\nThe government's April 2026 response supports recommendation 4 and supports recommendation 5 **in principle**. Its explanation defines that state as support for intent/merit with alternative delivery or further implementation consideration; it is not acceptance of every proposed term. For recommendation 5 it stresses vulnerable people, criminal activity and public safety alongside expression, and says the duty complements the Criminal Code without changing obligations under existing discrimination statutes. It separately declines to simply lower adult-abuse thresholds, citing operational costs and the distinction between systemic prevention and reactive schemes. Government response, PDF/printed pp3–6, recommendations 4–5 and adult-abuse discussion (see source references)\n\n## A consequential report-version qualification\n\nFOI25-247 Document 1, MS24-002100, is a departmental brief seeking acceptance of an updated final report. It records that Rickard sought final improvements at a **1 November 2024 meeting**, after delivery on **31 October**. Assistant Secretary **Andrew Irwin** cleared the brief on **8 November**. Attachment C, PDF7, reports five additions and **68 total recommendations**, with four characterized as already in the text but not called out; it lists new recommendation 5. Its introductory fifth item describes a daily penalty for non-compliance with a duty action, while item g/new recommendation35 describes a **$10m company maximum for removal-notice non-compliance** and says this was not previously addressed. These descriptions are inconsistent. The later government response says the published review has **67 recommendations**. No original total, deleted recommendation or final numbering is reconstructed by subtraction. PDF8 records a terminology-order change placing mental before physical wellbeing. The department describes changes as consistent with the delivered report and not changing findings; this is its characterization, not an acquired complete version comparison.\n\nThis establishes a post-delivery recommendation call-out and editorial revision. It does not establish that the substantive harm analysis originated in November, identify the individual drafter of recommendation 5, or show that the minister authored it. The readable approval alternatives/date fields are not proof of executed ministerial acceptance. Use **published updated review**, and distinguish original delivery from revision, rather than silently dating every public-page formulation to 31 October. FOI25-247, Document 1 PDF1–3 and Attachment C PDF7–8 (see source references)\n\n## Operative comparison: initial categories, future additions and adult choice\n\nThe exposure draft's distinctions are consequential:\n\n| Provision | Scope to preserve |\n| --- | --- |\n| §§25B–D, printed pp26–29 | Separate serious-harm protection, additional child protection and under-16 social-media feature obligations. Initial lists include targeted harassment, terrorism and harmful practices; no general misinformation/democracy category is named. |\n| §§25C(2), 25D(2), 27B | Minister-added categories require potential serious harm, or potential harm to children respectively; the minister must seek and consider eSafety advice. The child addition test does not expressly require seriousness. |\n| §§25E, 26A | Non-user and combined harms count. Assessment covers all reasonably foreseeable risks, including those relevant to the duty. Label absence does not settle every assessment obligation. |\n| §§25F–G | Specified features are deemed to have negative behavioural impacts. Ministerial additions have no express serious-harm threshold in §25G itself. |\n| §§25H, 26(7) | Reasonable practicability weighs risk, available measures, cost and reasonable privacy expectations. The exception concerns lawful private communications solely between consenting adults; it does not exempt all lawful adult speech or disable every separate Act power. |\n\nThese are proposed Australian legal mechanisms, not an incorporation of WEF's matrix. False information can intersect listed conduct; future additions remain possible. Exposure draft, §§25B–26A and 27B, printed pp26–34/37, PDF30–38/41 (see source references)\n\n## Earlier Australian legal sources and competing explanations\n\nThe **as-made 2021 Act** already defined serious physical/mental harm, distinguished serious distress from ordinary emotional reactions, and imposed targeted child/adult abuse tests. Its adult test combined likely intent to cause serious harm with an ordinary-reasonable-person assessment of the material. Sections 8–9 addressed contextual merit/consent and abhorrent violence. Section 106 tied class 1 to the Classification Act 1995 refusal category. These are directly inspected predecessors to the 2023 typology, rather than a presumed earlier neutral vocabulary. They supply a concrete competing source for similarities, while not proving every draft clause was copied from them. As-made Online Safety Act 2021, §§5–9 and 106 (see source references)\n\nThe April issues paper also discusses Australian research and existing abuse/content schemes beside its WEF references. This is consistent with synthesis from several inputs. The record supports influence through framing and documented advocacy; it does not support an exclusive linear chain in which a private taxonomy became law unchanged. Conversely, the existence of older law and contextual safeguards does not determine how broad future instruments or enforcement would become.\n\n## Candidate relations and remaining discriminating record\n\nPreserve **WEF typology → government April issues paper: cited for descriptive framing**, independently of **WEF typology → HRLC155: expressly adopted framing**. Add **WEF typology → eSafety guidance: explicitly used for educational categorisation**, with the page's update-date boundary. Preserve **Reset model → HRLC155: expressly endorsed**, and **review recommendation 5 → government response: supported in principle**. Treat **review taxonomy ↔ draft categories** as a documented comparison unless a clause-level attribution is obtained. None of these is a donor-instruction, private veto or enacted-ban relation.\n\nThe next discriminating record is a **category-by-category policy instruction, consultation disposition or drafting table for §§25C–G**, showing source, alternatives, threshold selection and ministerial clearance. The likely policy custodian is the department's online-safety reform team; the relevant record family is the 2025–26 duty-of-care drafting/consultation file, including instructions to legislative drafters. It would distinguish accepted wording from shared vocabulary and establish why broader labels were omitted or particular additions delegated. No such instruction or disposition was acquired here. This lane stops at that record-to-decision breakpoint for the forest review.\n\n## Actual reading scope and access state\n\nAll current access observations are 9 September 2026. This note contains scoped public-reader/indexed-primary findings. **No original PDF bytes, screenshots or original-byte hashes were acquired in this lane.** PDF/printed numbering is differentiated where verified. The separate prior authority note supplies a fuller clause discussion, not new visual evidence.\n\n| Source alias | Inspected scope / current working references |\n| --- | --- |\n| taxonomy-op-s-hrlc155 | §4.3 through §5.1.5, printed/PDF pp9–12; reader turn925view0/1 and indexed introductory passage turn926search4. Not every submission page. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-issues2024 | Part 3 overview/fn17; online-hate and technology-facilitated-abuse discussion/fn88/93. Reader turn935view1 and turn937view0/1. Date label April 2024; filename/internal working-title details do not establish a publication day. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-esafety | Types-of-harms section, following impact paragraphs and displayed update. Reader turn935view2 and turn937view2/3. Current page, no historical revision capture. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-resetgreen | Cover/about, printed pp1–3 background and pp6–7 systemic proposal/table. Reader turn940view1, turn941view0, turn942view1. Table is extracted text; no visual matrix claim. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-review | Complete indexed printed p56 recommendation and adjoining scope discussion, plus indexed p12 summary. turn926search0, turn941search12, turn943search12. A reader open returned content-too-large (13,286,332 bytes); no ordinary GET retried. Detailed §5.5 attribution is retained in prior policy-lineage.md, not newly audited here. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-foi247 | Document 1 PDF1–3, Attachment C PDF7–8, and limited draft-letter context PDF9. turn929view0, turn931view1, turn935view0. No inference from blank/alternative approval text to signed decision. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-response | PDF/printed pp3–6: response-state definitions, recommendations 4–5, related scope and adult-abuse discussion. turn947view0, reusing turn920view0. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-draft | §§25A–26A and 27B; scoped neighbouring compliance text also returned. turn926view0, turn929view1–3, turn931view0, turn942view2, turn943view1, turn944view0. Public text extraction only; closed normal-GET failures not repeated. |\n| taxonomy-op-s-osa2021 | Original/as-made ePub §§5–9 and class1 §106. Reached actual dated original through the Register's section link: turn944view1, turn946view0–2. The landing table-of-contents alone was not treated as historical substantive text. A December 2024 compilation was also read for comparison, turn931view2/turn935view3. |\n\nNo contributor biographies, new donor roster, private accounts, outreach, publication or canonical case edits were added. No inference about unseen draft material or access restrictions follows from these text-only readings.\n",
        "file": "research/taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-operative-categories.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers",
        "title": "Producers and limits of the WEF 2023 harms typology",
        "description": "Bounded artifact investigation, 9 September 2026, following the latest forest review. This concerns the August 2023 Toolkit for Digital Safety Design Interventions and Innovations: Typology of Online Harms, which HRLC submission155 expressly adopted as its framing. It is distinct from January 2023 Global Principles on Digital Safety, and from the May 2023 ri",
        "html": "<p>Bounded artifact investigation, 9 September 2026, following the latest forest review. This concerns the August 2023 <strong>Toolkit for Digital Safety Design Interventions and Innovations: Typology of Online Harms</strong>, which HRLC submission155 expressly adopted as its framing. It is distinct from January 2023 <strong>Global Principles on Digital Safety</strong>, and from the May 2023 risk-assessment framework. It is not Australian legislation, a compliance certification or an instruction to suppress everything within its categories.</p>\n<p>The useful new mechanism is a regulator/commercial-provider workstream producing a vocabulary that NGOs and officials could use. Primary records establish convening and drafting roles more specifically than membership rosters. They do not establish a private approval right over subsequent legislation. Full PDF credits and financial disclosures remain uninspected because both permitted acquisition routes failed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"production-roles-actually-established\">Production roles actually established</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Actor / artifact</th>\n<th>Established role and evidence</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>World Economic Forum Global Coalition for Digital Safety → typology</td>\n<td>Publisher&#x27;s landing page dates publication <strong>4 August 2023</strong> and presents it as a coalition output.</td>\n<td>Publication identifies responsibility for the output, not a contract or vote approving each definition. [Landing page](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Adam Hildreth and Julie Inman Grant → typology workstream</td>\n<td>Resolver&#x27;s article dated <strong>24 August 2023</strong> identifies Crisp&#x27;s founder and Australia&#x27;s eSafety Commissioner as co-chairs of the workstream compiling the typology.</td>\n<td>Participant account; current Resolver branding does not establish the exact 2023 contracting company. [Opening paragraph](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>John-Orr Hanna → typology</td>\n<td>SWGfL&#x27;s current biography expressly lists a <strong>drafting-committee</strong> role for the 2023 typology.</td>\n<td>Retrospective institutional biography, not a 2023 appointment instrument or proof of final approval. [Trustees, John-Orr Hanna, Recent Publications](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Four foreword signatories → typology</td>\n<td>Original indexed p3 names Hildreth, Inman Grant, Daniel Dobrygowski and Minos Bantourakis, with Crisp/eSafety/WEF affiliations.</td>\n<td>Foreword authorship is not automatically main-text authorship. [Original PDF, p3](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Inman Grant, Hildreth and Bantourakis → public launch explanation</td>\n<td>They coauthored WEF&#x27;s <strong>4 August 2023</strong> launch article. It reports collective input from regulators, companies, universities and civil society.</td>\n<td>Article byline and general collaboration account do not confer approval on every contributor. [Launch article](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>No inspected record identifies a commissioning contract, workstream appointment/selection rules, editorial sign-off procedure, donor restriction, payment amount or project-specific budget. This is an <strong>unestablished finance/approval layer</strong>, not a finding that production was unpaid or unfunded. The inaccessible PDF&#x27;s complete contributor, production and acknowledgment sections cannot be described as checked. Secondary bibliographies supplied a possible additional author initial, but it was not converted into a person or authorship edge without the original credit.</p>\n<p>The commercial connection matters as production participation. It does not demonstrate that Crisp/Resolver financed the typology, that any official procured its services, or that later statutory implementation requires its product. Resolver&#x27;s page now includes a product call-to-action; the dated article does not establish when that promotional component was inserted.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-artifact-sets-out-to-do\">What the artifact sets out to do</h2>\n<p>The original foreword p3 says the output is intended for cross-jurisdictional discussion, without severity ratings or use as regulatory compliance. The introduction p5 treats harm during production, distribution and consumption as distinct possibilities. A consensually created intimate image can become harmful when distributed without consent; overlapping categories are expected. It acknowledges contextual and regional differences, rather than offering universally precise definitions. These passages support policy development through common language, not automatic legal consequences. [Original, indexed complete p3 and p5 passages](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The coalition&#x27;s launch article adds that the scheme is not exhaustive and identifies a human-rights approach, including participation and expression. It connects the typology to its separate principles and risk-assessment outputs. This is a coordinated family of tools; the documents have different functions. [Launch article, Content, contact and conduct section and preceding rights paragraphs](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Six substantive families sit across content, contact and conduct: personal/community safety; health/wellbeing; hate/discrimination; dignity; privacy; and deception/manipulation. A publisher-hosted September explainer supplies useful boundary examples: graphic material documenting human-rights abuses or condemning violence needs an exception; some age restrictions may appropriately protect users; developmentally inappropriate material concerns children&#x27;s access. It distinguishes false information spread without the relevant deliberate deception from intentionally misleading disinformation. Those qualifications should travel with the labels. The article is an explanation by Douglas Broom, not a legal enactment or a substitute for the original matrix. [WEF, 1 September 2023, §§1–6](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Resolver&#x27;s detailed counterpart additionally makes consent and intent consequential: doxxing combines nonconsensual exposure with intention to place someone at risk; deceptive synthetic media includes an intention to harm. Its misinformation description does not require intent to mislead, while disinformation does. The present packet therefore does not treat every disclosed identity, synthetic image or mistake as satisfying those descriptions. [Resolver, Invasion of privacy and Deception and manipulation](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>These are taxonomy/explainer boundaries. They do not establish whether particular speech is lawful in Australia or elsewhere. No universal government-ID requirement, identity-provider preference or legally binding removal rule has been identified in the inspected text. A classification can nevertheless affect what policymakers and platforms consider; the important next handoff is where a decision-maker adopts a category and attaches an enforceable consequence.</p>\n<h2 id=\"earlier-sources-and-the-transmission-test\">Earlier sources and the transmission test</h2>\n<p>Resolver explicitly says the typology builds on <strong>CO:RE&#x27;s 4Cs research</strong> and links the 2021 Livingstone et al. paper. Its short account names content, contact and conduct while referring to 4Cs. Preserve that as a participant&#x27;s source attribution, not a claim that all prior categories were copied unchanged. The actual linked repository PDF returned an Anubis access denial, so its complete taxonomy and acknowledgments were not read here. [Resolver, What is the Typology of Online Harms?](http[local research file] [observed research link](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The launch authors also name international rights instruments as foundations. That supports a claimed rights lineage; this run did not independently audit each treaty article or reconstruct the original&#x27;s full Resources list. Neither “WEF invented online harm” nor “WEF merely copied a neutral universal dictionary” is established. Selection, grouping and framing are part of the documented work.</p>\n<p>The earlier Australian packet already establishes HRLC&#x27;s express adoption in submission155 §4.3, PDF/printed p9. A new primary-source search also discovered <strong>footnote88 in the government&#x27;s April 2024 review issues paper citing the typology</strong>, before HRLC&#x27;s July document. That record was handed to the separate comparison lane for passage-level inspection; it is a lead here, not a completed government-adoption claim. This timing could materially challenge a solely HRLC-mediated route. Current eSafety Safety-by-Design guidance also explicitly names the typology; the comparison lane owns that source read. The regulator&#x27;s production participation and possible independent official use must remain visible alongside NGO uptake.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relations\">Candidate relations</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Candidate ID</th>\n<th>Direction / type</th>\n<th>Evidence state</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-published</td>\n<td>WEF coalition → typology: published</td>\n<td>Observed publisher statement, 4 August 2023.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-cochairs</td>\n<td>Hildreth + Inman Grant → typology workstream: co-chaired compilation</td>\n<td>Reported by participant, dated 24 August 2023; no appointment contract.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-hanna</td>\n<td>Hanna → typology: drafting-committee participation</td>\n<td>Reported by current primary biography; no voting/approval inference.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-foreword</td>\n<td>Four named foreword signatories → typology: foreword credited</td>\n<td>Original indexed p3; keep distinct from main authors.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-launch</td>\n<td>Three named launch authors → launch explanation: coauthored</td>\n<td>Observed byline, 4 August 2023.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-core</td>\n<td>Typology → CO:RE 4Cs: reported intellectual antecedent</td>\n<td>Participant attribution; earlier original not read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-e-hrlc</td>\n<td>HRLC155 → typology: expressly adopts framing</td>\n<td>Reuse prior disposition edge; no duplication required.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>No donor-payment edge, contributor-to-clause-control edge, or typology-to-Australian-law edge is proposed.</p>\n<p>The strongest rival to a privately dictated mandate is a jointly produced, explicitly contextual reference tool used by several institutions for their own decisions. The strongest supported concern is narrower and more concrete: regulatory officials and a commercial safety provider helped set the shared vocabulary before later policy debate. Whether that collaboration gave any participant privileged implementation benefits, controlled definitions, or displaced a rejected alternative remains unestablished.</p>\n<p>The next discriminating records are the typology&#x27;s full credits/acknowledgments, workstream terms of reference, category-selection drafts or response log, and any disclosed commissioning/funding instrument. Likely holders are WEF&#x27;s coalition secretariat and the named co-chair organizations. Reopen through a genuinely obtainable public record, not repeated failed downloads. Return to the forest assessment before another acquisition branch.</p>\n<h2 id=\"scope-and-custody\">Scope and custody</h2>\n<p>All access observations: 9 September 2026. No original bytes or original-byte hash were acquired. This note is the lane output.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Source alias</th>\n<th>Reading scope and ancestry</th>\n<th>State</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-original</td>\n<td>Exact WEF PDF above. Full indexed foreword p3 and introduction p5 read (reader search records turn928search0, turn924search12).</td>\n<td>Scoped primary indexed text read. PDF web open returned <code>(400) Timeout fetching</code>; one ordinary requests GET substitute returned <code>ReadTimeout ... read timeout=30</code>. Closed after substitute. Full matrix/credits/resources not inspected.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-landing</td>\n<td>Official publication landing, publication date and descriptive body (turn923view1).</td>\n<td>Read HTML through web reader; no local original.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-launch</td>\n<td>Official 4 August launch article, byline and complete substantive body (turn927view0).</td>\n<td>Read HTML through web reader; author account, not participant minutes.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-resolver</td>\n<td>Participant&#x27;s 24 August article, opening, prior-source link, categories and closing (turn936view0).</td>\n<td>Read HTML through web reader. Current branding and page components observed; historical amendment date unknown.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-hanna</td>\n<td>SWGfL institutional page, only John-Orr Hanna biography / publications (turn936view1).</td>\n<td>Read current primary biography; page itself undated.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-explainer</td>\n<td>Douglas Broom, WEF 1 September article, byline and six categories (turn938view0).</td>\n<td>Read publisher-hosted explanation; author-view disclaimer present.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-core-lead</td>\n<td>SSOAR PDF reached through Resolver&#x27;s actual research link.</td>\n<td>Inaccessible: <code>Access Denied: error code 9e4edb5b6b850c41.</code> Page says protected by Anubis. Website refusal, not automatic sandbox-approval review. No retry.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-au-issues-lead</td>\n<td>http[local research file] ; indexed fn88 (turn933search17).</td>\n<td>Discovered and handed to comparison lane; not a new reader-verified adoption finding here.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>taxonomy-prod-s-esafety-lead</td>\n<td>http[local research file]</td>\n<td>Discovered and handed to comparison lane for read; no inference that guidance is statutory duty.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Searches surfaced the separate 2024 metrics paper and an unrelated digital-safety contributors list with a funder acknowledgment. They were excluded from this artifact&#x27;s finance/credits findings. An acknowledgment on a different WEF output cannot finance this typology by association. No closed ACNC, OPD or Australian draft/review GET route was retried; no outreach, account access, canonical case edit or publication occurred.</p>",
        "path": "taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09/taxonomy-producers.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w14-tax-s-original",
          "w14-tax-s-landing",
          "w14-tax-s-launch",
          "w14-tax-s-resolver",
          "w14-tax-s-hanna",
          "w14-tax-s-explainer",
          "w14-tax-s-core-inaccessible"
        ],
        "markdown": "Bounded artifact investigation, 9 September 2026, following the latest forest review. This concerns the August 2023 **Toolkit for Digital Safety Design Interventions and Innovations: Typology of Online Harms**, which HRLC submission155 expressly adopted as its framing. It is distinct from January 2023 **Global Principles on Digital Safety**, and from the May 2023 risk-assessment framework. It is not Australian legislation, a compliance certification or an instruction to suppress everything within its categories.\n\nThe useful new mechanism is a regulator/commercial-provider workstream producing a vocabulary that NGOs and officials could use. Primary records establish convening and drafting roles more specifically than membership rosters. They do not establish a private approval right over subsequent legislation. Full PDF credits and financial disclosures remain uninspected because both permitted acquisition routes failed.\n\n## Production roles actually established\n\n| Actor / artifact | Established role and evidence | Limit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| World Economic Forum Global Coalition for Digital Safety → typology | Publisher's landing page dates publication **4 August 2023** and presents it as a coalition output. | Publication identifies responsibility for the output, not a contract or vote approving each definition. Landing page (see source references) |\n| Adam Hildreth and Julie Inman Grant → typology workstream | Resolver's article dated **24 August 2023** identifies Crisp's founder and Australia's eSafety Commissioner as co-chairs of the workstream compiling the typology. | Participant account; current Resolver branding does not establish the exact 2023 contracting company. Opening paragraph (see source references) |\n| John-Orr Hanna → typology | SWGfL's current biography expressly lists a **drafting-committee** role for the 2023 typology. | Retrospective institutional biography, not a 2023 appointment instrument or proof of final approval. Trustees, John-Orr Hanna, Recent Publications (see source references) |\n| Four foreword signatories → typology | Original indexed p3 names Hildreth, Inman Grant, Daniel Dobrygowski and Minos Bantourakis, with Crisp/eSafety/WEF affiliations. | Foreword authorship is not automatically main-text authorship. Original PDF, p3 (see source references) |\n| Inman Grant, Hildreth and Bantourakis → public launch explanation | They coauthored WEF's **4 August 2023** launch article. It reports collective input from regulators, companies, universities and civil society. | Article byline and general collaboration account do not confer approval on every contributor. Launch article (see source references) |\n\nNo inspected record identifies a commissioning contract, workstream appointment/selection rules, editorial sign-off procedure, donor restriction, payment amount or project-specific budget. This is an **unestablished finance/approval layer**, not a finding that production was unpaid or unfunded. The inaccessible PDF's complete contributor, production and acknowledgment sections cannot be described as checked. Secondary bibliographies supplied a possible additional author initial, but it was not converted into a person or authorship edge without the original credit.\n\nThe commercial connection matters as production participation. It does not demonstrate that Crisp/Resolver financed the typology, that any official procured its services, or that later statutory implementation requires its product. Resolver's page now includes a product call-to-action; the dated article does not establish when that promotional component was inserted.\n\n## What the artifact sets out to do\n\nThe original foreword p3 says the output is intended for cross-jurisdictional discussion, without severity ratings or use as regulatory compliance. The introduction p5 treats harm during production, distribution and consumption as distinct possibilities. A consensually created intimate image can become harmful when distributed without consent; overlapping categories are expected. It acknowledges contextual and regional differences, rather than offering universally precise definitions. These passages support policy development through common language, not automatic legal consequences. Original, indexed complete p3 and p5 passages (see source references)\n\nThe coalition's launch article adds that the scheme is not exhaustive and identifies a human-rights approach, including participation and expression. It connects the typology to its separate principles and risk-assessment outputs. This is a coordinated family of tools; the documents have different functions. Launch article, Content, contact and conduct section and preceding rights paragraphs (see source references)\n\nSix substantive families sit across content, contact and conduct: personal/community safety; health/wellbeing; hate/discrimination; dignity; privacy; and deception/manipulation. A publisher-hosted September explainer supplies useful boundary examples: graphic material documenting human-rights abuses or condemning violence needs an exception; some age restrictions may appropriately protect users; developmentally inappropriate material concerns children's access. It distinguishes false information spread without the relevant deliberate deception from intentionally misleading disinformation. Those qualifications should travel with the labels. The article is an explanation by Douglas Broom, not a legal enactment or a substitute for the original matrix. WEF, 1 September 2023, §§1–6 (see source references)\n\nResolver's detailed counterpart additionally makes consent and intent consequential: doxxing combines nonconsensual exposure with intention to place someone at risk; deceptive synthetic media includes an intention to harm. Its misinformation description does not require intent to mislead, while disinformation does. The present packet therefore does not treat every disclosed identity, synthetic image or mistake as satisfying those descriptions. Resolver, Invasion of privacy and Deception and manipulation (see source references)\n\nThese are taxonomy/explainer boundaries. They do not establish whether particular speech is lawful in Australia or elsewhere. No universal government-ID requirement, identity-provider preference or legally binding removal rule has been identified in the inspected text. A classification can nevertheless affect what policymakers and platforms consider; the important next handoff is where a decision-maker adopts a category and attaches an enforceable consequence.\n\n## Earlier sources and the transmission test\n\nResolver explicitly says the typology builds on **CO:RE's 4Cs research** and links the 2021 Livingstone et al. paper. Its short account names content, contact and conduct while referring to 4Cs. Preserve that as a participant's source attribution, not a claim that all prior categories were copied unchanged. The actual linked repository PDF returned an Anubis access denial, so its complete taxonomy and acknowledgments were not read here. Resolver, What is the Typology of Online Harms? (see source references) observed research link (see source references)\n\nThe launch authors also name international rights instruments as foundations. That supports a claimed rights lineage; this run did not independently audit each treaty article or reconstruct the original's full Resources list. Neither “WEF invented online harm” nor “WEF merely copied a neutral universal dictionary” is established. Selection, grouping and framing are part of the documented work.\n\nThe earlier Australian packet already establishes HRLC's express adoption in submission155 §4.3, PDF/printed p9. A new primary-source search also discovered **footnote88 in the government's April 2024 review issues paper citing the typology**, before HRLC's July document. That record was handed to the separate comparison lane for passage-level inspection; it is a lead here, not a completed government-adoption claim. This timing could materially challenge a solely HRLC-mediated route. Current eSafety Safety-by-Design guidance also explicitly names the typology; the comparison lane owns that source read. The regulator's production participation and possible independent official use must remain visible alongside NGO uptake.\n\n## Candidate relations\n\n| Candidate ID | Direction / type | Evidence state |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-published | WEF coalition → typology: published | Observed publisher statement, 4 August 2023. |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-cochairs | Hildreth + Inman Grant → typology workstream: co-chaired compilation | Reported by participant, dated 24 August 2023; no appointment contract. |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-hanna | Hanna → typology: drafting-committee participation | Reported by current primary biography; no voting/approval inference. |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-foreword | Four named foreword signatories → typology: foreword credited | Original indexed p3; keep distinct from main authors. |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-launch | Three named launch authors → launch explanation: coauthored | Observed byline, 4 August 2023. |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-core | Typology → CO:RE 4Cs: reported intellectual antecedent | Participant attribution; earlier original not read. |\n| taxonomy-prod-e-hrlc | HRLC155 → typology: expressly adopts framing | Reuse prior disposition edge; no duplication required. |\n\nNo donor-payment edge, contributor-to-clause-control edge, or typology-to-Australian-law edge is proposed.\n\nThe strongest rival to a privately dictated mandate is a jointly produced, explicitly contextual reference tool used by several institutions for their own decisions. The strongest supported concern is narrower and more concrete: regulatory officials and a commercial safety provider helped set the shared vocabulary before later policy debate. Whether that collaboration gave any participant privileged implementation benefits, controlled definitions, or displaced a rejected alternative remains unestablished.\n\nThe next discriminating records are the typology's full credits/acknowledgments, workstream terms of reference, category-selection drafts or response log, and any disclosed commissioning/funding instrument. Likely holders are WEF's coalition secretariat and the named co-chair organizations. Reopen through a genuinely obtainable public record, not repeated failed downloads. Return to the forest assessment before another acquisition branch.\n\n## Scope and custody\n\nAll access observations: 9 September 2026. No original bytes or original-byte hash were acquired. This note is the lane output.\n\n| Source alias | Reading scope and ancestry | State |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-original | Exact WEF PDF above. Full indexed foreword p3 and introduction p5 read (reader search records turn928search0, turn924search12). | Scoped primary indexed text read. PDF web open returned `(400) Timeout fetching`; one ordinary requests GET substitute returned `ReadTimeout ... read timeout=30`. Closed after substitute. Full matrix/credits/resources not inspected. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-landing | Official publication landing, publication date and descriptive body (turn923view1). | Read HTML through web reader; no local original. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-launch | Official 4 August launch article, byline and complete substantive body (turn927view0). | Read HTML through web reader; author account, not participant minutes. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-resolver | Participant's 24 August article, opening, prior-source link, categories and closing (turn936view0). | Read HTML through web reader. Current branding and page components observed; historical amendment date unknown. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-hanna | SWGfL institutional page, only John-Orr Hanna biography / publications (turn936view1). | Read current primary biography; page itself undated. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-explainer | Douglas Broom, WEF 1 September article, byline and six categories (turn938view0). | Read publisher-hosted explanation; author-view disclaimer present. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-core-lead | SSOAR PDF reached through Resolver's actual research link. | Inaccessible: `Access Denied: error code 9e4edb5b6b850c41.` Page says protected by Anubis. Website refusal, not automatic sandbox-approval review. No retry. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-au-issues-lead | http[local research file] ; indexed fn88 (turn933search17). | Discovered and handed to comparison lane; not a new reader-verified adoption finding here. |\n| taxonomy-prod-s-esafety-lead | http[local research file] | Discovered and handed to comparison lane for read; no inference that guidance is statutory duty. |\n\nSearches surfaced the separate 2024 metrics paper and an unrelated digital-safety contributors list with a funder acknowledgment. They were excluded from this artifact's finance/credits findings. An acknowledgment on a different WEF output cannot finance this typology by association. No closed ACNC, OPD or Australian draft/review GET route was retried; no outreach, account access, canonical case edit or publication occurred.\n",
        "file": "research/taxonomy-wave-2026-09-09-taxonomy-producers.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance",
        "title": "Altitude: product governance and correction boundaries",
        "description": "Observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded static inspection of the public implementation linked by Tech Against Terrorism (TAT), not an installed or deployed system test. Acquisition is closed. No product/API calls, accounts, forms, content feeds, terrorist-content files, dependency installation or repository test suite were used. Canonical cases, readers",
        "html": "<p>Observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded static inspection of the public implementation linked by Tech Against Terrorism (TAT), not an installed or deployed system test. Acquisition is closed. No product/API calls, accounts, forms, content feeds, terrorist-content files, dependency installation or repository test suite were used. Canonical cases, readers and ZIPs were untouched.</p>\n<h2 id=\"result\">Result</h2>\n<p>The public records establish a real route from privately supplied classifications into a platform&#x27;s review queue. In the inspected version, TCAP is explicitly treated as a trusted source when calculating confidence for prioritisation. They also establish platform choices over source connections, feedback sharing, authentication and the moderation verdict. These are different decision points: source authority influences attention; the inspected workflow does not make the source&#x27;s flag an automatic removal order.</p>\n<p>There are concrete correction facilities, but they must not be collapsed into an end-user remedy. A moderator can cancel a draft review before publication; the inspected create endpoint can append another review to an existing case. The generic importer contains a source-redaction hook. Optional feedback can return platform verdicts to TCAP. None of these inspected paths establishes that an upstream correction automatically restores removed content, notifies its author, or reopens every affected case.</p>\n<h2 id=\"public-identity-maintenance-and-version\">Public identity, maintenance and version</h2>\n<p>TAT&#x27;s [22 July 2024 stewardship announcement](http[local research file] says Altitude was built with Google Jigsaw, TAT will lead maintenance and development, and Jigsaw will continue advisory support. It describes prior testing with small and medium platforms, but provides no independently verified deployment, participant list or measured acceptance result in the body read. The announcement and [current product page](http[local research file] offer free access/onboarding through the Bronze support tier, with additional support/features at higher tiers. No financial amount or Canadian grant allocation is stated in these sources.</p>\n<p>The product&#x27;s exact public repository link is [Jigsaw-Code/altitude](http[local research file] Its observed main commit was <strong>496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685</strong>, authored/committed <strong>8 August 2024</strong>, message “Fix typo.” All retained source files are pinned to that commit. A repository still under the Jigsaw-Code namespace is not proof of Google&#x27;s present operational veto, and this observation of main does not establish that no other development or deployed version exists.</p>\n<p>The [contribution instructions](http[local research file] require a contributor agreement and review of submissions, including those by project members. They say contributors or employers retain copyright. The actual signed CLA, repository permissions, branch protections and named final approvers were not acquired. The retained [Apache 2.0 licence](http[local research file] permits reproduction/modification/distribution subject to its conditions; it disclaims warranty and allows separately accepted support obligations. These software permissions do not grant access to restricted signal databases or establish a support contract&#x27;s terms.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-configures-access-and-source-use\">Who configures access and source use</h2>\n<p>The [README](http[local research file] requires the platform to obtain TCAP and GIFCT credentials. The product page describes the platform installing the tool, comparing its content to consolidated signals, and a moderator reviewing and selecting action. The [overview](http[local research file] distinguishes signals, the client&#x27;s target content, cases and human reviews. The inspected public software is therefore not proof that TAT has unrestricted access to every customer dataset or chooses every target.</p>\n<p>The [FAQ, lines 90–104](http[local research file] assigns authentication to the integrator and says the tool itself supplies no user accounts. This is a documented deployment responsibility, not a finding that any actual production instance is unauthenticated. No deployed role assignments or separation between administrator and reviewer was inspected.</p>\n<p>The [UI service configuration routes, lines 617–707](http[local research file] expose separate enabled and diagnostics-enabled settings for TCAP and GIFCT connections. The [importer creation endpoint, lines 73–133](http[local research file] defaults a new import connection to active and <strong>diagnostic sharing to inactive</strong>, subject to successful credential pre-check. This establishes configurable connections in the source, not a particular customer&#x27;s consent setting or the upstream organisations&#x27; admission rules.</p>\n<h2 id=\"classification-and-priority-a-specific-implementation-of-trust\">Classification and priority: a specific implementation of trust</h2>\n<p>The [TCAP adapter, lines 141–182](http[local research file] imports source identifiers and report dates, associated organisation text, personal-information and extreme-content flags, a URL and its checked availability status. Those are input metadata, not an independent adjudication by Altitude.</p>\n<p>The [priority implementation, lines 24–135](http[local research file] has <code>TRUSTED_SOURCES</code> containing TCAP. A signal from that source qualifies for the highest confidence component (3), as can multiple source names or sufficient trust metadata. Severity is calculated separately from tags and features. TCAP&#x27;s confidence boost <strong>does not alone guarantee the highest overall queue priority</strong>, and neither score is a moderation verdict. The term confidence here denotes the implemented heuristic; no calibration study was inspected.</p>\n<p>The [FAQ, lines 29–64](http[local research file] says cases are ranked by combined confidence/severity, with severity weighted and absent flagger data shown as N/A. Its example table is illustrative. The inspected scoring choices are source-code constants; no customer-facing editor for those rules was established. Apache modification rights make adaptation possible, but do not show that a customer changed these defaults or that TAT approves every local change.</p>\n<h2 id=\"verdict-delivery-and-undo-are-separate\">Verdict, delivery and undo are separate</h2>\n<p>The <a>review endpoint, lines 47–87</a>.</p>\n<p>The [publication/delivery code, lines 522–604](http[local research file] publishes the draft and sends client context, APPROVE/BLOCK and decision time to a configured action receiver. <strong>Without that receiver, the inspected branch writes a local verdict log.</strong> A successful receiver response, or that local log branch, produces the code&#x27;s ACCEPTED delivery status; it is not proof of removal from a live service. The README&#x27;s general statement that all decisions are logged should therefore not replace this conditional implementation detail. A platform must implement what receipt of a verdict does.</p>\n<p>The [FAQ, lines 106–113](http[local research file] explicitly allows “Remove” to be renamed for platforms whose action differs. The retained client config maps APPROVE to “Leave up” and BLOCK to “Remove.” Labels are not evidence of execution. The FAQ also says uploaded content remains archived locally after platform removal and needs separate database deletion (lines 22–27).</p>\n<h2 id=\"feedback-and-upstream-correction-partial-paths\">Feedback and upstream correction: partial paths</h2>\n<p>The <a>task exporter, lines 701–738</a>.</p>\n<p>The [TCAP exporter, lines 227–254](http[local research file] sends URL plus decision, translating BLOCK to REMOVE and APPROVE to APPROVE. It demonstrates a feedback mechanism, not that TCAP accepts a disagreement, changes a label or propagates a correction. The FAQ&#x27;s claims about improved accuracy and effectiveness are product claims, not measured results in this review. GIFCT&#x27;s adapter payload was not inspected; its existence must not inherit TCAP&#x27;s exact payload semantics.</p>\n<p>The <a>generic importer, lines 156–195</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-reading-scope-and-finite-frontier\">Custody, reading scope and finite frontier</h2>\n<p><code>altitude-captures.json</code> records 24 retained public originals, exact URLs, retrieval times, byte lengths, SHA-256 values, pinned commit and per-file reading scope. Five GitHub tree captures were used only for exact path discovery. Announcement/product bodies, README, overview, FAQ, CONTRIBUTING, the full priority/review/importer/TCAP-adapter/base-importer files, and the specified task/UI route passages were read. Licence sections 2–9 were read. No fixtures, image examples or underlying harmful content were opened. The GitHub docs-directory reader cache miss was closed; exact linked static files were available. Successful ordinary GETs were retained without claiming a full repository audit.</p>\n<p>The next discriminator is a <strong>named deployment&#x27;s operative configuration and acceptance/correction receipt</strong>: version and changes, source and diagnostics choices, reviewer authentication/authority, action-receiver behaviour, and an upstream withdrawal carried through to a logged decision and restored or retained content. TAT/platform custodians would hold those records. The historical funder&#x27;s accepted output or code-version record would separately connect grant-funded delivery to this implementation. No Canadian allocation, donor instruction, universal platform execution or live correction result is inferred from this public code.</p>",
        "path": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09/altitude-governance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-announcement",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-product",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-readme",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-license",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-contribution",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-faq",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-priority",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-review",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-import-config",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tasks",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter",
          "w26-ver-s-altitude-base-importer"
        ],
        "markdown": "Observed 9 September 2026. This is a bounded static inspection of the public implementation linked by Tech Against Terrorism (TAT), not an installed or deployed system test. Acquisition is closed. No product/API calls, accounts, forms, content feeds, terrorist-content files, dependency installation or repository test suite were used. Canonical cases, readers and ZIPs were untouched.\n\n## Result\n\nThe public records establish a real route from privately supplied classifications into a platform's review queue. In the inspected version, TCAP is explicitly treated as a trusted source when calculating confidence for prioritisation. They also establish platform choices over source connections, feedback sharing, authentication and the moderation verdict. These are different decision points: source authority influences attention; the inspected workflow does not make the source's flag an automatic removal order.\n\nThere are concrete correction facilities, but they must not be collapsed into an end-user remedy. A moderator can cancel a draft review before publication; the inspected create endpoint can append another review to an existing case. The generic importer contains a source-redaction hook. Optional feedback can return platform verdicts to TCAP. None of these inspected paths establishes that an upstream correction automatically restores removed content, notifies its author, or reopens every affected case.\n\n## Public identity, maintenance and version\n\nTAT's 22 July 2024 stewardship announcement (see source references) says Altitude was built with Google Jigsaw, TAT will lead maintenance and development, and Jigsaw will continue advisory support. It describes prior testing with small and medium platforms, but provides no independently verified deployment, participant list or measured acceptance result in the body read. The announcement and current product page (see source references) offer free access/onboarding through the Bronze support tier, with additional support/features at higher tiers. No financial amount or Canadian grant allocation is stated in these sources.\n\nThe product's exact public repository link is Jigsaw-Code/altitude (see source references) Its observed main commit was **496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685**, authored/committed **8 August 2024**, message “Fix typo.” All retained source files are pinned to that commit. A repository still under the Jigsaw-Code namespace is not proof of Google's present operational veto, and this observation of main does not establish that no other development or deployed version exists.\n\nThe contribution instructions (see source references) require a contributor agreement and review of submissions, including those by project members. They say contributors or employers retain copyright. The actual signed CLA, repository permissions, branch protections and named final approvers were not acquired. The retained Apache 2.0 licence (see source references) permits reproduction/modification/distribution subject to its conditions; it disclaims warranty and allows separately accepted support obligations. These software permissions do not grant access to restricted signal databases or establish a support contract's terms.\n\n## Who configures access and source use\n\nThe README (see source references) requires the platform to obtain TCAP and GIFCT credentials. The product page describes the platform installing the tool, comparing its content to consolidated signals, and a moderator reviewing and selecting action. The overview (see source references) distinguishes signals, the client's target content, cases and human reviews. The inspected public software is therefore not proof that TAT has unrestricted access to every customer dataset or chooses every target.\n\nThe FAQ, lines 90–104 (see source references) assigns authentication to the integrator and says the tool itself supplies no user accounts. This is a documented deployment responsibility, not a finding that any actual production instance is unauthenticated. No deployed role assignments or separation between administrator and reviewer was inspected.\n\nThe UI service configuration routes, lines 617–707 (see source references) expose separate enabled and diagnostics-enabled settings for TCAP and GIFCT connections. The importer creation endpoint, lines 73–133 (see source references) defaults a new import connection to active and **diagnostic sharing to inactive**, subject to successful credential pre-check. This establishes configurable connections in the source, not a particular customer's consent setting or the upstream organisations' admission rules.\n\n## Classification and priority: a specific implementation of trust\n\nThe TCAP adapter, lines 141–182 (see source references) imports source identifiers and report dates, associated organisation text, personal-information and extreme-content flags, a URL and its checked availability status. Those are input metadata, not an independent adjudication by Altitude.\n\nThe priority implementation, lines 24–135 (see source references) has `TRUSTED_SOURCES` containing TCAP. A signal from that source qualifies for the highest confidence component (3), as can multiple source names or sufficient trust metadata. Severity is calculated separately from tags and features. TCAP's confidence boost **does not alone guarantee the highest overall queue priority**, and neither score is a moderation verdict. The term confidence here denotes the implemented heuristic; no calibration study was inspected.\n\nThe FAQ, lines 29–64 (see source references) says cases are ranked by combined confidence/severity, with severity weighted and absent flagger data shown as N/A. Its example table is illustrative. The inspected scoring choices are source-code constants; no customer-facing editor for those rules was established. Apache modification rights make adaptation possible, but do not show that a customer changed these defaults or that TAT approves every local change.\n\n## Verdict, delivery and undo are separate\n\nThe review endpoint, lines 47–87.\n\nThe publication/delivery code, lines 522–604 (see source references) publishes the draft and sends client context, APPROVE/BLOCK and decision time to a configured action receiver. **Without that receiver, the inspected branch writes a local verdict log.** A successful receiver response, or that local log branch, produces the code's ACCEPTED delivery status; it is not proof of removal from a live service. The README's general statement that all decisions are logged should therefore not replace this conditional implementation detail. A platform must implement what receipt of a verdict does.\n\nThe FAQ, lines 106–113 (see source references) explicitly allows “Remove” to be renamed for platforms whose action differs. The retained client config maps APPROVE to “Leave up” and BLOCK to “Remove.” Labels are not evidence of execution. The FAQ also says uploaded content remains archived locally after platform removal and needs separate database deletion (lines 22–27).\n\n## Feedback and upstream correction: partial paths\n\nThe task exporter, lines 701–738.\n\nThe TCAP exporter, lines 227–254 (see source references) sends URL plus decision, translating BLOCK to REMOVE and APPROVE to APPROVE. It demonstrates a feedback mechanism, not that TCAP accepts a disagreement, changes a label or propagates a correction. The FAQ's claims about improved accuracy and effectiveness are product claims, not measured results in this review. GIFCT's adapter payload was not inspected; its existence must not inherit TCAP's exact payload semantics.\n\nThe generic importer, lines 156–195.\n\n## Custody, reading scope and finite frontier\n\n`altitude-captures.json` records 24 retained public originals, exact URLs, retrieval times, byte lengths, SHA-256 values, pinned commit and per-file reading scope. Five GitHub tree captures were used only for exact path discovery. Announcement/product bodies, README, overview, FAQ, CONTRIBUTING, the full priority/review/importer/TCAP-adapter/base-importer files, and the specified task/UI route passages were read. Licence sections 2–9 were read. No fixtures, image examples or underlying harmful content were opened. The GitHub docs-directory reader cache miss was closed; exact linked static files were available. Successful ordinary GETs were retained without claiming a full repository audit.\n\nThe next discriminator is a **named deployment's operative configuration and acceptance/correction receipt**: version and changes, source and diagnostics choices, reviewer authentication/authority, action-receiver behaviour, and an upstream withdrawal carried through to a logged decision and restored or retained content. TAT/platform custodians would hold those records. The historical funder's accepted output or code-version record would separately connect grant-funded delivery to this implementation. No Canadian allocation, donor instruction, universal platform execution or live correction result is inferred from this public code.\n",
        "file": "research/tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-altitude-governance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access",
        "title": "TCAP Archive, Hash API and Trusted Flagger access",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded public-document pass complete. No account, policy-access application, content database, live API endpoint, underlying media, demo or contact request was accessed or submitted. Product documentation is evidence of the published interface and intended workflow, not runtime verification or an executed customer agreement. No publication",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded public-document pass complete. No account, policy-access application, content database, live API endpoint, underlying media, demo or contact request was accessed or submitted. Product documentation is evidence of the published interface and intended workflow, not runtime verification or an executed customer agreement. No publication or deployment date is inferred from a 2025 documentation copyright, a 2026 website footer or illustrative timestamps.</p>\n<p>The useful new finding is a documented <strong>item-level correction interface and a deletion signal intended for recipient caches</strong>. The remaining gap is narrower than an absence of correction machinery: actual handling of disputed hashes, recipient synchronization and reconsideration of already imposed restrictions remain unobserved.</p>\n<h2 id=\"who-has-which-published-capability\">Who has which published capability</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Surface</th>\n<th>Published actor and capability</th>\n<th>Authority/evidence boundary</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Archive Research Portal</td>\n<td>TAT advertises media access for platforms and researchers, with automated/human sourcing and classification by AI models and OSINT specialists.</td>\n<td>The page is a product explanation and contact route. It does not publish an admission rubric, download licence, redistribution permission or current government-access rule.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Archive Hash List API</td>\n<td>Platforms can ingest fingerprints in bulk, filter them and cache updates.</td>\n<td>This concerns fingerprints; it is not permission to download or republish the underlying media. Recipient implementation and contractual reuse terms were not acquired.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Trusted Flagger Platform</td>\n<td>TAT describes trusted partners submitting categorized URLs for removal referrals, supported by its analysts and human/AI classifiers.</td>\n<td>Participation is applied for. Detailed selection/permission rules and a statutory designation of these participants were not acquired. The product name alone supplies neither.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hash feedback</td>\n<td>Onboarded users can report individual-hash problems and see analyst responses and decisions on their own feedback.</td>\n<td>This is an internal review interface, not an established appeal right for every affected content creator or a demonstrated independent adjudication process.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Research source: [Archive Database Research Portal](http[local research file] complete substantive product body; retained <code>archive-research.txt</code> lines 1–19. Hash product source: [Archive Database Hash List API](http[local research file] complete body; <code>archive-hash-product.txt</code> lines 1–16. Both are current observed pages with unknown revision dates. The hash page advertises daily updates and filters by file type, algorithm and ideology; its contact link is not an unrestricted public-download offer.</p>\n<h2 id=\"submission-review-and-routing-are-separate-steps\">Submission, review and routing are separate steps</h2>\n<p>The [Trusted Flagger product page](http[local research file] describes tiered URL submissions, a permission-controlled review environment, TAT analyst assessment and metadata supplied to recipient platforms. It advertises referrals to 125-plus platforms, retained historic requests, platform feedback and expansion of the archive/hash lists. That is an explicit advertised contribution path from referrals to a reusable collection, not proof that every submitted URL is admitted or every recipient acts. Its accuracy claim concerns online/offline status classification, not a measured terrorist-label accuracy rate. Complete substantive body read, <code>archive-trusted-flagger.txt</code> lines 1–56, especially 4–16 and 30–50. “Apply” on this page returned the same public page through the reader; no application was submitted.</p>\n<p>The earlier accepted classification summary says TAT in-house experts assess source and content; the detailed verification policy remains behind an access-request form. The earlier accepted tier-policy/FAQ findings are reused from <a href=\"/research/private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat\">tat.md</a>, not reacquired. In particular, the old FAQ&#x27;s no-download and no-government-access statements cannot settle the current Archive product&#x27;s rights: that FAQ still describes future 2021/2022 development. The new TFP page&#x27;s five-tier capability likewise does not establish when an older forthcoming tier became operational or what its current rule text says.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-public-correction-interface\">The public correction interface</h2>\n<p>[Content Hash List Feedback documentation](http[local research file] describes feedback from hash-list users for false positives, classification errors, duplicates and other issues. A report identifies the hash and category; an explanation is optional. Users can retrieve their submitted feedback, analyst responses and decisions. The decision states include removal, non-removal and pending, with response-sent status. Analysts aim to reply by onboarding email within three to five working days. This is an aim, not a demonstrated deadline met in a real case. Locators: Overview; Request Body; Feedback Status; Query Parameters/Feedback Object; Response notifications. Retained <code>archive-feedback-docs-prose.txt</code> lines 1–6, 18–30 and 35–48.</p>\n<p>The example JSON is illustrative: fictional names and placeholder prose appear in it. Its counts, decisions and timestamps are <strong>not</strong> actual complaint volumes, decided appeals or deployment evidence. No request was executed. Neither this page nor the other inspected public access material establishes an independent appeal body, a second-level review route or a rule requiring restoration after a successful challenge.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-can-reach-another-system-after-correction\">What can reach another system after correction</h2>\n<p>[Content Hash List documentation](http[local research file] exposes fingerprints plus classification/file metadata, a deletion marker and last-update time. It describes checkpointed incremental updates and recommends local caching and monitoring deprecated entries. Soft deletion retains hash history. Thus it documents a technical means for a recipient to learn of a withdrawal while updating a local cache; it does not prove that recipients implemented it or erased prior copies. Locators: Query Parameters, Checkpointing, Hash Object Fields, Implementation Notes and Best Practices; <code>archive-hash-docs-prose.txt</code> lines 15–39.</p>\n<p>The same page documents a ThreatExchange client configuration for fetching/comparing TAT hashes (lines 40–48). This is an interoperability instruction, not a new governance, funding or compulsory-database-membership relation. No client was installed or run. The inspected documentation does not specify a recipient-wide push notification, correction acknowledgement, compulsory rescan or reopening of prior moderation decisions. Those are acquisition gaps, not evidence they never occur.</p>\n<p>The [Authentication documentation](http[local research file] introduction and service list, expressly presupposes an already onboarded TCAP or Archive user with credentials. <code>archive-auth-docs.txt</code> lines 1–18; web-reader introduction and service lists also read. That establishes an access prerequisite, not the identity of the onboarding decision-maker or eligibility contract. Token examples and later implementation details were captured but not audited or executed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"why-current-archive-terms-remain-an-identified-gap\">Why current Archive terms remain an identified gap</h2>\n<p>The public [Policies index](http[local research file] describes its Archive destination as containing terms of use, an access policy and taxonomy. Its actual [Archive link](http[local research file] returned a web-reader internal error. The sole ordinary GET substitute succeeded, but the substantive HTML body contained only the heading <strong>Archiving Policies</strong>. Inspection found no iframe, embedded document or body terms/access-policy link. This is an obtainable page with no substantive policy text, not an administrative denial or evidence that no policy exists. Original retained as <code>archive-archive-policy.html</code>.</p>\n<p>The index&#x27;s [legacy Research Portal feature](http[local research file] failed in the web reader with “Cache miss”; one ordinary GET succeeded with an empty substantive body. Its [legacy hash feature](http[local research file] supplied navigation and an empty heading in the reader. These routes were then closed. No guessed private document path, gated full-policy request or account route was used. The latter reader-only observation is retained in this note; no original hash-feature HTML was acquired.</p>\n<p>Consequently this pass does not establish current media-download rights, onward hash redistribution/licensing, customer-model training permission, accepted-flagger criteria, cross-user visibility of archived requests, or an affected nonmember&#x27;s formal challenge route. TAT/OHF would hold the current access agreement, permissions matrix and review procedure. Participating recipients would hold their cache-update and reconsideration records. Asking for those records would require a separately authorized outreach branch; none occurred here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"forest-implication-and-next-discriminator\">Forest implication and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>The plausible mechanism is distributed classification with controlled access and recipient discretion. The advertised Archive/TFP relationship can enlarge a shared collection; documented review and soft-delete fields can also correct it. A claim that there is no item-level challenge or withdrawal mechanism is now too strong. A claim that such a mechanism guarantees downstream remedy is also too strong. The strongest rival to a correction-failure theory is that ordinary recipient implementations consume deletion updates promptly and independently prevent or reverse mistakes; the public interface is consistent with that account.</p>\n<p>The discriminating record is a redacted completed hash challenge linked to its analyst decision, resulting update/deletion record, recipient synchronization acknowledgement and any reconsideration of prior action. An executed access/usage agreement would separately establish mandatory handling and reuse limits. These records are not replaced by a documentation example or URL-availability statistics. Acquisition stops here for the parent&#x27;s forest review.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-scope\">Custody and scope</h2>\n<p><code>archive-captures.json</code> contains exact discovered URLs, final URLs, UTC acquisition times, hashes, lengths, reading scopes and source ancestry. Eight ordinary HTML captures succeeded; originals are response bytes and text files are derivatives. Seven new useful substantive/product or boundary sources were read/inspected plus the empty legacy Research Portal capture. The API home and Policies index were discovery/reader sources, not separately downloaded. Source IDs use the local <code>archive-s-</code> prefix; they are not canonical-case insertions.</p>\n<p>The hash and feedback substantive descriptions/tables were read from both the public reader and newly retained HTML-derived prose. Example JSON was inspected in the reader for its illustrative nature; code snippets were not tested. Research/TFP/hash product bodies were read in full. Authentication scope is its prerequisite and service list only. Archive HTML was inspected for visible body content, links and document embeds. No full policy, live service behavior, extremist original or private customer dataset is claimed as read.</p>\n<p>Decisive original SHA-256: hash docs <code>e8e4c49c4b8bb5ee3c4be1fade240bb09d2f60834e3204a6b0a4d3f6e1c78df4</code>; feedback docs <code>e454d1fadc7944f8e115cef5edd73412da40831b4f4e72275b0ce7a89a58b71f</code>; Archive policy shell <code>d5c6e1fdafdb822b89a9bedd1997a468641e69a1d3dd04f9fb902eca43176c02</code>. Other hashes and exact scopes are in the manifest. No canonical case, previous packet or ZIP was changed.</p>\n<h3 id=\"candidate-typed-relations-for-a-later-accepted-integration\">Candidate typed relations for a later accepted integration</h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From → to</th>\n<th>Typed relation and evidence stage</th>\n<th>Source pointer</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Trusted Flagger participants → TAT review/referral system</td>\n<td>Submission permission/capability, as advertised; no actual submission inferred.</td>\n<td><code>archive-s-trusted-flagger</code>, body lines 4–14, 30–50.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>TAT classification/Archive → onboarded hash-list recipient</td>\n<td>Documented fingerprint and update interface; recipient implementation not observed.</td>\n<td><code>archive-s-hash-docs</code>, Hash Object Fields and Implementation Notes; <code>archive-s-auth-docs</code>, introduction.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hash-list user → TAT analyst</td>\n<td>Documented error/inclusion feedback route, including response/decision visibility for the submitting user.</td>\n<td><code>archive-s-feedback-docs</code>, Overview, Feedback Status, Response notifications.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>TAT hash record → recipient cache</td>\n<td>Documented deletion/update signal plus recommended incremental synchronization; not proven delivery, erasure or restoration.</td>\n<td><code>archive-s-hash-docs</code>, Implementation Notes and Best Practices.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>All are current public-document observations on 9 September 2026 with unknown exact deployment dates. No donation, procurement mandate, DSA appointment or government item-selection edge is supported by this packet.</p>",
        "path": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09/archive-access.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-archive-product",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-feedback",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-auth",
          "w26-ver-s-archive-policy-shell",
          "w26-ver-s-tfp-product"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded public-document pass complete. No account, policy-access application, content database, live API endpoint, underlying media, demo or contact request was accessed or submitted. Product documentation is evidence of the published interface and intended workflow, not runtime verification or an executed customer agreement. No publication or deployment date is inferred from a 2025 documentation copyright, a 2026 website footer or illustrative timestamps.\n\nThe useful new finding is a documented **item-level correction interface and a deletion signal intended for recipient caches**. The remaining gap is narrower than an absence of correction machinery: actual handling of disputed hashes, recipient synchronization and reconsideration of already imposed restrictions remain unobserved.\n\n## Who has which published capability\n\n| Surface | Published actor and capability | Authority/evidence boundary |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Archive Research Portal | TAT advertises media access for platforms and researchers, with automated/human sourcing and classification by AI models and OSINT specialists. | The page is a product explanation and contact route. It does not publish an admission rubric, download licence, redistribution permission or current government-access rule. |\n| Archive Hash List API | Platforms can ingest fingerprints in bulk, filter them and cache updates. | This concerns fingerprints; it is not permission to download or republish the underlying media. Recipient implementation and contractual reuse terms were not acquired. |\n| Trusted Flagger Platform | TAT describes trusted partners submitting categorized URLs for removal referrals, supported by its analysts and human/AI classifiers. | Participation is applied for. Detailed selection/permission rules and a statutory designation of these participants were not acquired. The product name alone supplies neither. |\n| Hash feedback | Onboarded users can report individual-hash problems and see analyst responses and decisions on their own feedback. | This is an internal review interface, not an established appeal right for every affected content creator or a demonstrated independent adjudication process. |\n\nResearch source: Archive Database Research Portal (see source references) complete substantive product body; retained `archive-research.txt` lines 1–19. Hash product source: Archive Database Hash List API (see source references) complete body; `archive-hash-product.txt` lines 1–16. Both are current observed pages with unknown revision dates. The hash page advertises daily updates and filters by file type, algorithm and ideology; its contact link is not an unrestricted public-download offer.\n\n## Submission, review and routing are separate steps\n\nThe Trusted Flagger product page (see source references) describes tiered URL submissions, a permission-controlled review environment, TAT analyst assessment and metadata supplied to recipient platforms. It advertises referrals to 125-plus platforms, retained historic requests, platform feedback and expansion of the archive/hash lists. That is an explicit advertised contribution path from referrals to a reusable collection, not proof that every submitted URL is admitted or every recipient acts. Its accuracy claim concerns online/offline status classification, not a measured terrorist-label accuracy rate. Complete substantive body read, `archive-trusted-flagger.txt` lines 1–56, especially 4–16 and 30–50. “Apply” on this page returned the same public page through the reader; no application was submitted.\n\nThe earlier accepted classification summary says TAT in-house experts assess source and content; the detailed verification policy remains behind an access-request form. The earlier accepted tier-policy/FAQ findings are reused from [tat.md](private-verification-wave-2026-09-09-tat.md), not reacquired. In particular, the old FAQ's no-download and no-government-access statements cannot settle the current Archive product's rights: that FAQ still describes future 2021/2022 development. The new TFP page's five-tier capability likewise does not establish when an older forthcoming tier became operational or what its current rule text says.\n\n## The public correction interface\n\nContent Hash List Feedback documentation (see source references) describes feedback from hash-list users for false positives, classification errors, duplicates and other issues. A report identifies the hash and category; an explanation is optional. Users can retrieve their submitted feedback, analyst responses and decisions. The decision states include removal, non-removal and pending, with response-sent status. Analysts aim to reply by onboarding email within three to five working days. This is an aim, not a demonstrated deadline met in a real case. Locators: Overview; Request Body; Feedback Status; Query Parameters/Feedback Object; Response notifications. Retained `archive-feedback-docs-prose.txt` lines 1–6, 18–30 and 35–48.\n\nThe example JSON is illustrative: fictional names and placeholder prose appear in it. Its counts, decisions and timestamps are **not** actual complaint volumes, decided appeals or deployment evidence. No request was executed. Neither this page nor the other inspected public access material establishes an independent appeal body, a second-level review route or a rule requiring restoration after a successful challenge.\n\n## What can reach another system after correction\n\nContent Hash List documentation (see source references) exposes fingerprints plus classification/file metadata, a deletion marker and last-update time. It describes checkpointed incremental updates and recommends local caching and monitoring deprecated entries. Soft deletion retains hash history. Thus it documents a technical means for a recipient to learn of a withdrawal while updating a local cache; it does not prove that recipients implemented it or erased prior copies. Locators: Query Parameters, Checkpointing, Hash Object Fields, Implementation Notes and Best Practices; `archive-hash-docs-prose.txt` lines 15–39.\n\nThe same page documents a ThreatExchange client configuration for fetching/comparing TAT hashes (lines 40–48). This is an interoperability instruction, not a new governance, funding or compulsory-database-membership relation. No client was installed or run. The inspected documentation does not specify a recipient-wide push notification, correction acknowledgement, compulsory rescan or reopening of prior moderation decisions. Those are acquisition gaps, not evidence they never occur.\n\nThe Authentication documentation (see source references) introduction and service list, expressly presupposes an already onboarded TCAP or Archive user with credentials. `archive-auth-docs.txt` lines 1–18; web-reader introduction and service lists also read. That establishes an access prerequisite, not the identity of the onboarding decision-maker or eligibility contract. Token examples and later implementation details were captured but not audited or executed.\n\n## Why current Archive terms remain an identified gap\n\nThe public Policies index (see source references) describes its Archive destination as containing terms of use, an access policy and taxonomy. Its actual Archive link (see source references) returned a web-reader internal error. The sole ordinary GET substitute succeeded, but the substantive HTML body contained only the heading **Archiving Policies**. Inspection found no iframe, embedded document or body terms/access-policy link. This is an obtainable page with no substantive policy text, not an administrative denial or evidence that no policy exists. Original retained as `archive-archive-policy.html`.\n\nThe index's legacy Research Portal feature (see source references) failed in the web reader with “Cache miss”; one ordinary GET succeeded with an empty substantive body. Its legacy hash feature (see source references) supplied navigation and an empty heading in the reader. These routes were then closed. No guessed private document path, gated full-policy request or account route was used. The latter reader-only observation is retained in this note; no original hash-feature HTML was acquired.\n\nConsequently this pass does not establish current media-download rights, onward hash redistribution/licensing, customer-model training permission, accepted-flagger criteria, cross-user visibility of archived requests, or an affected nonmember's formal challenge route. TAT/OHF would hold the current access agreement, permissions matrix and review procedure. Participating recipients would hold their cache-update and reconsideration records. Asking for those records would require a separately authorized outreach branch; none occurred here.\n\n## Forest implication and next discriminator\n\nThe plausible mechanism is distributed classification with controlled access and recipient discretion. The advertised Archive/TFP relationship can enlarge a shared collection; documented review and soft-delete fields can also correct it. A claim that there is no item-level challenge or withdrawal mechanism is now too strong. A claim that such a mechanism guarantees downstream remedy is also too strong. The strongest rival to a correction-failure theory is that ordinary recipient implementations consume deletion updates promptly and independently prevent or reverse mistakes; the public interface is consistent with that account.\n\nThe discriminating record is a redacted completed hash challenge linked to its analyst decision, resulting update/deletion record, recipient synchronization acknowledgement and any reconsideration of prior action. An executed access/usage agreement would separately establish mandatory handling and reuse limits. These records are not replaced by a documentation example or URL-availability statistics. Acquisition stops here for the parent's forest review.\n\n## Custody and scope\n\n`archive-captures.json` contains exact discovered URLs, final URLs, UTC acquisition times, hashes, lengths, reading scopes and source ancestry. Eight ordinary HTML captures succeeded; originals are response bytes and text files are derivatives. Seven new useful substantive/product or boundary sources were read/inspected plus the empty legacy Research Portal capture. The API home and Policies index were discovery/reader sources, not separately downloaded. Source IDs use the local `archive-s-` prefix; they are not canonical-case insertions.\n\nThe hash and feedback substantive descriptions/tables were read from both the public reader and newly retained HTML-derived prose. Example JSON was inspected in the reader for its illustrative nature; code snippets were not tested. Research/TFP/hash product bodies were read in full. Authentication scope is its prerequisite and service list only. Archive HTML was inspected for visible body content, links and document embeds. No full policy, live service behavior, extremist original or private customer dataset is claimed as read.\n\nDecisive original SHA-256: hash docs `e8e4c49c4b8bb5ee3c4be1fade240bb09d2f60834e3204a6b0a4d3f6e1c78df4`; feedback docs `e454d1fadc7944f8e115cef5edd73412da40831b4f4e72275b0ce7a89a58b71f`; Archive policy shell `d5c6e1fdafdb822b89a9bedd1997a468641e69a1d3dd04f9fb902eca43176c02`. Other hashes and exact scopes are in the manifest. No canonical case, previous packet or ZIP was changed.\n\n### Candidate typed relations for a later accepted integration\n\n| From → to | Typed relation and evidence stage | Source pointer |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Trusted Flagger participants → TAT review/referral system | Submission permission/capability, as advertised; no actual submission inferred. | `archive-s-trusted-flagger`, body lines 4–14, 30–50. |\n| TAT classification/Archive → onboarded hash-list recipient | Documented fingerprint and update interface; recipient implementation not observed. | `archive-s-hash-docs`, Hash Object Fields and Implementation Notes; `archive-s-auth-docs`, introduction. |\n| Hash-list user → TAT analyst | Documented error/inclusion feedback route, including response/decision visibility for the submitting user. | `archive-s-feedback-docs`, Overview, Feedback Status, Response notifications. |\n| TAT hash record → recipient cache | Documented deletion/update signal plus recommended incremental synchronization; not proven delivery, erasure or restoration. | `archive-s-hash-docs`, Implementation Notes and Best Practices. |\n\nAll are current public-document observations on 9 September 2026 with unknown exact deployment dates. No donation, procurement mandate, DSA appointment or government item-selection edge is supported by this packet.\n",
        "file": "research/tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance",
        "title": "Canadian TCAP delivery and sponsor acceptance — bounded return",
        "description": "Acquisition closed: 9 September 2026. This is a candidate research note, not a canonical-case edit. It builds on the accepted ../quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09/canadian-awards.md, read before this inquiry. Original custody and hashes are in canadian-acceptance-captures.json.",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed: 9 September 2026. This is a candidate research note, not a canonical-case edit. It builds on the accepted <code>../quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09/canadian-awards.md</code>, read before this inquiry. Original custody and hashes are in <code>canadian-acceptance-captures.json</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finding-that-changes-the-map\">Finding that changes the map</h2>\n<p>A publicly released departmental status document records Canada partnering with Tech Against Terrorism to formally launch TCAP 2.0 at the Canada Centre&#x27;s event of 1–5 May 2023. This earns a dated government participation/delivery relation. It does not establish acceptance of either grant workstream, completion of Phase 2, a contractual milestone, or authorization/payment of a particular instalment.</p>\n<p>The same October 2023 document records <strong>Canada Centre–US National Security Council coordination on engagement with TAT</strong>, and reports a <strong>US funding process for TAT linked to Christchurch commitments</strong>. These are substantive governmental coordination and resource-mobilization relations, alongside the launch. The acquired Canadian record supplies the attribution; it does not identify a completed US award, paying agency, amount, conditions or payment.</p>\n<p>The public structure therefore includes intergovernmental engagement around TAT and a reported US funding process, as well as the Canadian agreement → stated workstreams → joint-launch chain. The Canadian sponsor&#x27;s specific acceptance and financial certification record is still missing. A launch near the beginning of the disclosed Phase 2 term can concern an initial release while further development continues.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s1-departmental-record-of-coordinated-engagement-launch-and-funding-process\">S1 — departmental record of coordinated engagement, launch and funding process</h2>\n<p>Original: [Public Safety Leader-Level Commitments and Roadmap Items, CAN033380](http[local research file] Internal document updated <strong>5 October 2023</strong>, visually confirmed; publicly released in PIFI Canada Release 033, <strong>12 August 2024</strong>. The old Protected B marking remains on the copy, alongside the public-release marking. It is an openly published commission exhibit.</p>\n<p>Read scope: first four of 22 PDF pages, including table context; visual inspection of all four pages, with page 2 added during the local refinement. No claim to reading later pages. Page 1 establishes the Background / Current Status / Next Steps columns. Pages 3–4, rightmost <strong>Next Steps</strong> column, report the completed joint launch at the event of 1–5 May 2023. Page 2&#x27;s general “On track” status concerns broader commitment 36 and is not TCAP grant acceptance. The adjoining Phase 2 capability description remains prospective. Do not attribute grant-approval authority to officials merely listed in the broader coordination row.</p>\n<p><strong>Institutional context, scoped to this 5 October 2023 internal status account:</strong> PDF2&#x27;s <strong>Background</strong> column, Commitment 36 / Prevention, says the Canada Centre worked with the US National Security Council on engagement with TAT concerning support for small social-media platforms addressing terrorist exploitation. The visual column alignment has been checked. This reports coordination around a named intermediary, without documenting who drafted particular classifications or could order a platform decision. Its separate OECD bullet does not make OECD part of the TCAP award.</p>\n<p>PDF4&#x27;s <strong>Next Steps</strong> column, continuing the joint-launch paragraph from PDF3, reports that the US was in the process of granting funding to TAT and links that funding to advancing Christchurch Call commitments. It earns a <strong>Canadian-department-reported US funding process as of October 2023</strong>, not an executed or paid US award. The passage does not name the US awarding agency, agreement, amount, exact application/approval stage, conditions or payment. The NSC engagement and US funding statements should remain separate relations; the latter does not identify the NSC as the funder.</p>\n<p>Retained: <code>canadian-can033380.pdf</code>; SHA-256 <code>51e45f81d9fa135c043e29e73c2071ea8fb5eb058c85d847a6839cf1d3381e16</code>. Scoped text and page images are derivatives of these exact bytes. OCR rendered the update date incorrectly; the stated 5 October date comes from the image.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s2-exact-recipient-and-promised-outputs-not-acceptance\">S2 — exact recipient and promised outputs, not acceptance</h2>\n<p>Original: [Public Safety Canada backgrounder, 3 May 2023](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Read scope: title/date/overview and the complete <strong>Recipient: Online Harms Foundation / TCAP Phase 2</strong> entry; adjacent entries only as extraction boundaries. It names CAD1,945,904 and describes a protected archive, broader classification coverage and development of a moderation workflow tool. The prospective wording does not certify delivery. Its promotional database-size characterization is a departmental assertion, not an acquired independent performance measurement.</p>\n<p>The exact amount and recipient corroborate the previously retained disclosure for agreement <strong>22841</strong>; this is another source for that same award, not another allocation. The entry does not split the award between workstreams, specify acceptance tests, attach a reporting schedule, or disclose paid cash.</p>\n<p>Retained: <code>canadian-may2023-announcement.html</code>; SHA-256 <code>951c5c680c4322f64f1cbef0fc4afd6b133c674f5e45f3234081e1ad82eb2d6a</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s3-reported-agreement-execution-during-201920\">S3 — reported agreement execution during 2019–20</h2>\n<p>Original: [Public Safety Departmental Results Report 2019–20](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>Read scope: complete <strong>Countering Radicalization to Violence</strong> subsection, including the TAT box and funding-agreement paragraph; report title, errata notice and current footer date. This is not a full departmental report audit. The current page says modified <strong>9 April 2025</strong>; its reporting period remains 2019–20, and this inquiry did not establish its original online publication date.</p>\n<p>The department reports six signed funding agreements in 2019–20 and includes a rounded CAD1m TAT agreement. This supports attributed government reporting of execution during that fiscal year. It does not supply the executed instrument, exact signature date, payment receipt, or evidence that the repository had already been completed. The precise contribution value and legal recipient remain sourced to the earlier disclosure records. Do not convert the rounded number into a competing exact total.</p>\n<p>Retained: <code>canadian-drr2019-20.html</code>; SHA-256 <code>2ad60e90104fe46c2fda489fb0dc4f0f7502d0f8da4f966415c098128d9f199f</code>. <code>canadian-drr2019-20-scoped-extract.txt</code> is a derivative of its named subsection.</p>\n<h2 id=\"s4-programme-contribution-narrative-adds-no-acceptance-test\">S4 — programme contribution narrative adds no acceptance test</h2>\n<p>Original: [Contributions du gouvernement du Canada à l&#x27;Appel de Christchurch 2022–2023](http[local research file] Full substantive French body read. Current footer modified <strong>26 June 2025</strong>; the title&#x27;s 2022–23 period is distinct from that maintenance date.</p>\n<p>The account recalls the 2022 TAT funding announcement and the subsequent Canadian conference and financing announcement. It provides no project evaluation, milestone certification, acceptance standard, or payment authorization. Its broader digital-citizenship and law-enforcement discussion was not converted into TCAP funding or operational control. This is a government contribution narrative, not a programme evaluation or project audit.</p>\n<p>Retained: <code>canadian-christchurch2022-23-fr.html</code>; SHA-256 <code>a5784a73ab6713af139526ee33218a0958f2233deb52655b3fa20f1ec3f093a1</code>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"prior-records-retained-without-upgrading-their-state\">Prior records retained without upgrading their state</h2>\n<p>Agreement <strong>21415</strong>: QuantSpark Foundation, initial CAD1,155,622.44; amended total CAD1,256,688.09, with the prior packet preserving the one-day start-date discrepancy and the 22 November 2021 amendment. Agreement <strong>22841</strong>: Online Harms Foundation, CAD1,945,904, disclosed term <strong>1 April 2023–31 March 2026</strong>. The exact detail records and amendment are already retained; they were not reacquired. Legal aliasing to company 11656320 depends on the separate registry evidence, not the Canadian records themselves.</p>\n<p>The earlier packet&#x27;s current CRF terms show a reporting/payment framework but are modified 25 May 2026. They must not be silently imported as the actual 2020 or 2023 executed agreement terms. No new current-programme-rule edge is warranted here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-typed-relations-reuse-existing-actors-and-award-nodes\">Candidate typed relations — reuse existing actors and award nodes</h2>\n<p>| Relation | Evidence/action state | What this permits and excludes |</p>\n<p>|---|---|---|</p>\n<p>| Canada Centre ↔ US National Security Council | Canadian-department-reported coordination on engagement with TAT; S1 PDF2 Background; status account updated 5 October 2023 | Named institutional coordination and subject matter; meeting date, individual decision rights and operational instructions unestablished. |\n| Canada Centre / US NSC engagement → TAT support for small social-media platforms | Reported engagement purpose; same S1 PDF2 passage | Preserve the named intermediary and purpose, without inventing a joint legal body or a government classification mandate. |\n| US government → TAT funding process | Canadian-department-reported process underway; S1 PDF4 Next Steps; as of 5 October 2023 | Christchurch-linked intended funding; awarding agency, agreement, amount, execution and payment unknown. Do not substitute NSC as the funder. |\n| Public Safety Canada / Canada Centre → TCAP 2.0 launch, 1–5 May 2023 | Government-reported joint launch; S1 PDF3–4 | Dated participation in launch, not award acceptance or complete Phase 2 delivery. Link TAT as the named partner separately from OHF&#x27;s legal-recipient role. |</p>\n<p>| Public Safety Canada → agreement 21415 / original TCAP funding | Government-reported signed agreement during FY2019–20; S3 subsection | Adds source ancestry supporting reported execution; exact amount and identity stay with disclosure. No cash state. |</p>\n<p>| Public Safety Canada → agreement 22841 / two workstreams | Official announced purpose, 3 May 2023; S2 recipient entry | Corroborates already-mapped award and intended deliverables; no duplicate amount or new award. |</p>\n<p>No edge from government to an accepted milestone, performance score, specific content decision, platform takedown requirement, or disbursement is earned by this return.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-search-and-closed-frontier\">Finite search and closed frontier</h2>\n<p>This inquiry used seven focused queries, rather than reopening all award routes: <code>site:publicsafety.gc.ca &quot;TCAP&quot; &quot;results&quot;</code>; <code>site:canada.ca &quot;22841&quot; &quot;Terrorist&quot;</code>; <code>site:publicsafety.gc.ca &quot;Tech Against Terrorism&quot; evaluation</code>; <code>&quot;21415&quot; &quot;Terrorist Content&quot; report acceptance</code>; <code>site:publicsafety.gc.ca (&quot;21415&quot; OR &quot;22841&quot;)</code>; <code>site:canada.ca &quot;Terrorist Content Analytics Platform&quot; (evaluation OR milestones OR acceptance OR results)</code>; <code>site:publicsafety.gc.ca &quot;Tech Against Terrorism&quot; (evaluation OR &quot;final report&quot; OR &quot;performance&quot;)</code>.</p>\n<p>Results supplied the released status exhibit and official reporting above, existing award-disclosure duplicates, announcements, and tangential records. Paginated disclosure snippets were discovery only; no inference from their surrounding unrelated entries. The 2022–23 departmental report and February 2026 briefing appeared in search results but were not opened or treated as independent acquired acceptance evidence. Parliamentary testimony and recipient reports were left to the delivery lane, because recipient performance assertions do not themselves establish sponsor approval. No programme evaluation was promoted to project acceptance.</p>\n<p>The French online-extremism page supplied the Christchurch report link. An initial combined tool result was wholly truncated and counted as unread; a single re-open of that link succeeded. The report&#x27;s English-language link returned a web internal error; the French original and full substantive text sufficed, so there was no retry or proxy. Four ordinary public GET captures succeeded with status 200. Previously closed award routes were not repeated.</p>\n<p><strong>Precise frontier:</strong> executed agreements 21415 and 22841 and their schedules/amendments; the recipient&#x27;s dated interim/final workstream reports; the department&#x27;s comments, acceptance or deficiency decision; and any linked payment certification. The likely record holders are Public Safety Canada&#x27;s Canada Centre/CRF grants administration and the recipient for its counterpart copies. No request has been sent. Public non-location in this finite pass is not proof those records do not exist or that the project failed.</p>\n<p>A discriminating next record would match an actual archived-data or workflow-tool deliverable to a specified agreement milestone and show the responsible official accepting, conditionally accepting or rejecting it. Until then the rival explanations remain ordinary staged development after launch, departmental endorsement without published contractual acceptance, or further review/conditions whose records are not public in this corpus. The present evidence does not select between those explanations.</p>\n<h2 id=\"local-refinement-record\">Local refinement record</h2>\n<p>On 9 September 2026, the prior packet was preserved as <code>canadian-acceptance-before-institutional-refinement.md</code> before adding the institutional context already present in retained CAN033380. PDF2 was rendered and visually read; PDF3–4 had already been visually checked. The refinement adds no external acquisition, US award search or new source. See <code>canadian-acceptance-refinement-receipt.json</code> for before/after hashes. Acquisition remains closed pending the parent forest assessment.</p>",
        "path": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09/canadian-acceptance.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-ca-status2023",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-award2023",
          "w26-ver-s-ca-results2019"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed: 9 September 2026. This is a candidate research note, not a canonical-case edit. It builds on the accepted `../quantspark-finance-wave-2026-09-09/canadian-awards.md`, read before this inquiry. Original custody and hashes are in `canadian-acceptance-captures.json`.\n\n## Finding that changes the map\n\nA publicly released departmental status document records Canada partnering with Tech Against Terrorism to formally launch TCAP 2.0 at the Canada Centre's event of 1–5 May 2023. This earns a dated government participation/delivery relation. It does not establish acceptance of either grant workstream, completion of Phase 2, a contractual milestone, or authorization/payment of a particular instalment.\n\nThe same October 2023 document records **Canada Centre–US National Security Council coordination on engagement with TAT**, and reports a **US funding process for TAT linked to Christchurch commitments**. These are substantive governmental coordination and resource-mobilization relations, alongside the launch. The acquired Canadian record supplies the attribution; it does not identify a completed US award, paying agency, amount, conditions or payment.\n\nThe public structure therefore includes intergovernmental engagement around TAT and a reported US funding process, as well as the Canadian agreement → stated workstreams → joint-launch chain. The Canadian sponsor's specific acceptance and financial certification record is still missing. A launch near the beginning of the disclosed Phase 2 term can concern an initial release while further development continues.\n\n## S1 — departmental record of coordinated engagement, launch and funding process\n\nOriginal: Public Safety Leader-Level Commitments and Roadmap Items, CAN033380 (see source references) Internal document updated **5 October 2023**, visually confirmed; publicly released in PIFI Canada Release 033, **12 August 2024**. The old Protected B marking remains on the copy, alongside the public-release marking. It is an openly published commission exhibit.\n\nRead scope: first four of 22 PDF pages, including table context; visual inspection of all four pages, with page 2 added during the local refinement. No claim to reading later pages. Page 1 establishes the Background / Current Status / Next Steps columns. Pages 3–4, rightmost **Next Steps** column, report the completed joint launch at the event of 1–5 May 2023. Page 2's general “On track” status concerns broader commitment 36 and is not TCAP grant acceptance. The adjoining Phase 2 capability description remains prospective. Do not attribute grant-approval authority to officials merely listed in the broader coordination row.\n\n**Institutional context, scoped to this 5 October 2023 internal status account:** PDF2's **Background** column, Commitment 36 / Prevention, says the Canada Centre worked with the US National Security Council on engagement with TAT concerning support for small social-media platforms addressing terrorist exploitation. The visual column alignment has been checked. This reports coordination around a named intermediary, without documenting who drafted particular classifications or could order a platform decision. Its separate OECD bullet does not make OECD part of the TCAP award.\n\nPDF4's **Next Steps** column, continuing the joint-launch paragraph from PDF3, reports that the US was in the process of granting funding to TAT and links that funding to advancing Christchurch Call commitments. It earns a **Canadian-department-reported US funding process as of October 2023**, not an executed or paid US award. The passage does not name the US awarding agency, agreement, amount, exact application/approval stage, conditions or payment. The NSC engagement and US funding statements should remain separate relations; the latter does not identify the NSC as the funder.\n\nRetained: `canadian-can033380.pdf`; SHA-256 `51e45f81d9fa135c043e29e73c2071ea8fb5eb058c85d847a6839cf1d3381e16`. Scoped text and page images are derivatives of these exact bytes. OCR rendered the update date incorrectly; the stated 5 October date comes from the image.\n\n## S2 — exact recipient and promised outputs, not acceptance\n\nOriginal: Public Safety Canada backgrounder, 3 May 2023 (see source references)\n\nRead scope: title/date/overview and the complete **Recipient: Online Harms Foundation / TCAP Phase 2** entry; adjacent entries only as extraction boundaries. It names CAD1,945,904 and describes a protected archive, broader classification coverage and development of a moderation workflow tool. The prospective wording does not certify delivery. Its promotional database-size characterization is a departmental assertion, not an acquired independent performance measurement.\n\nThe exact amount and recipient corroborate the previously retained disclosure for agreement **22841**; this is another source for that same award, not another allocation. The entry does not split the award between workstreams, specify acceptance tests, attach a reporting schedule, or disclose paid cash.\n\nRetained: `canadian-may2023-announcement.html`; SHA-256 `951c5c680c4322f64f1cbef0fc4afd6b133c674f5e45f3234081e1ad82eb2d6a`.\n\n## S3 — reported agreement execution during 2019–20\n\nOriginal: Public Safety Departmental Results Report 2019–20 (see source references)\n\nRead scope: complete **Countering Radicalization to Violence** subsection, including the TAT box and funding-agreement paragraph; report title, errata notice and current footer date. This is not a full departmental report audit. The current page says modified **9 April 2025**; its reporting period remains 2019–20, and this inquiry did not establish its original online publication date.\n\nThe department reports six signed funding agreements in 2019–20 and includes a rounded CAD1m TAT agreement. This supports attributed government reporting of execution during that fiscal year. It does not supply the executed instrument, exact signature date, payment receipt, or evidence that the repository had already been completed. The precise contribution value and legal recipient remain sourced to the earlier disclosure records. Do not convert the rounded number into a competing exact total.\n\nRetained: `canadian-drr2019-20.html`; SHA-256 `2ad60e90104fe46c2fda489fb0dc4f0f7502d0f8da4f966415c098128d9f199f`. `canadian-drr2019-20-scoped-extract.txt` is a derivative of its named subsection.\n\n## S4 — programme contribution narrative adds no acceptance test\n\nOriginal: Contributions du gouvernement du Canada à l'Appel de Christchurch 2022–2023 (see source references) Full substantive French body read. Current footer modified **26 June 2025**; the title's 2022–23 period is distinct from that maintenance date.\n\nThe account recalls the 2022 TAT funding announcement and the subsequent Canadian conference and financing announcement. It provides no project evaluation, milestone certification, acceptance standard, or payment authorization. Its broader digital-citizenship and law-enforcement discussion was not converted into TCAP funding or operational control. This is a government contribution narrative, not a programme evaluation or project audit.\n\nRetained: `canadian-christchurch2022-23-fr.html`; SHA-256 `a5784a73ab6713af139526ee33218a0958f2233deb52655b3fa20f1ec3f093a1`.\n\n## Prior records retained without upgrading their state\n\nAgreement **21415**: QuantSpark Foundation, initial CAD1,155,622.44; amended total CAD1,256,688.09, with the prior packet preserving the one-day start-date discrepancy and the 22 November 2021 amendment. Agreement **22841**: Online Harms Foundation, CAD1,945,904, disclosed term **1 April 2023–31 March 2026**. The exact detail records and amendment are already retained; they were not reacquired. Legal aliasing to company 11656320 depends on the separate registry evidence, not the Canadian records themselves.\n\nThe earlier packet's current CRF terms show a reporting/payment framework but are modified 25 May 2026. They must not be silently imported as the actual 2020 or 2023 executed agreement terms. No new current-programme-rule edge is warranted here.\n\n## Candidate typed relations — reuse existing actors and award nodes\n\n| Relation | Evidence/action state | What this permits and excludes |\n\n|---|---|---|\n\n| Canada Centre ↔ US National Security Council | Canadian-department-reported coordination on engagement with TAT; S1 PDF2 Background; status account updated 5 October 2023 | Named institutional coordination and subject matter; meeting date, individual decision rights and operational instructions unestablished. |\n| Canada Centre / US NSC engagement → TAT support for small social-media platforms | Reported engagement purpose; same S1 PDF2 passage | Preserve the named intermediary and purpose, without inventing a joint legal body or a government classification mandate. |\n| US government → TAT funding process | Canadian-department-reported process underway; S1 PDF4 Next Steps; as of 5 October 2023 | Christchurch-linked intended funding; awarding agency, agreement, amount, execution and payment unknown. Do not substitute NSC as the funder. |\n| Public Safety Canada / Canada Centre → TCAP 2.0 launch, 1–5 May 2023 | Government-reported joint launch; S1 PDF3–4 | Dated participation in launch, not award acceptance or complete Phase 2 delivery. Link TAT as the named partner separately from OHF's legal-recipient role. |\n\n| Public Safety Canada → agreement 21415 / original TCAP funding | Government-reported signed agreement during FY2019–20; S3 subsection | Adds source ancestry supporting reported execution; exact amount and identity stay with disclosure. No cash state. |\n\n| Public Safety Canada → agreement 22841 / two workstreams | Official announced purpose, 3 May 2023; S2 recipient entry | Corroborates already-mapped award and intended deliverables; no duplicate amount or new award. |\n\nNo edge from government to an accepted milestone, performance score, specific content decision, platform takedown requirement, or disbursement is earned by this return.\n\n## Finite search and closed frontier\n\nThis inquiry used seven focused queries, rather than reopening all award routes: `site:publicsafety.gc.ca \"TCAP\" \"results\"`; `site:canada.ca \"22841\" \"Terrorist\"`; `site:publicsafety.gc.ca \"Tech Against Terrorism\" evaluation`; `\"21415\" \"Terrorist Content\" report acceptance`; `site:publicsafety.gc.ca (\"21415\" OR \"22841\")`; `site:canada.ca \"Terrorist Content Analytics Platform\" (evaluation OR milestones OR acceptance OR results)`; `site:publicsafety.gc.ca \"Tech Against Terrorism\" (evaluation OR \"final report\" OR \"performance\")`.\n\nResults supplied the released status exhibit and official reporting above, existing award-disclosure duplicates, announcements, and tangential records. Paginated disclosure snippets were discovery only; no inference from their surrounding unrelated entries. The 2022–23 departmental report and February 2026 briefing appeared in search results but were not opened or treated as independent acquired acceptance evidence. Parliamentary testimony and recipient reports were left to the delivery lane, because recipient performance assertions do not themselves establish sponsor approval. No programme evaluation was promoted to project acceptance.\n\nThe French online-extremism page supplied the Christchurch report link. An initial combined tool result was wholly truncated and counted as unread; a single re-open of that link succeeded. The report's English-language link returned a web internal error; the French original and full substantive text sufficed, so there was no retry or proxy. Four ordinary public GET captures succeeded with status 200. Previously closed award routes were not repeated.\n\n**Precise frontier:** executed agreements 21415 and 22841 and their schedules/amendments; the recipient's dated interim/final workstream reports; the department's comments, acceptance or deficiency decision; and any linked payment certification. The likely record holders are Public Safety Canada's Canada Centre/CRF grants administration and the recipient for its counterpart copies. No request has been sent. Public non-location in this finite pass is not proof those records do not exist or that the project failed.\n\nA discriminating next record would match an actual archived-data or workflow-tool deliverable to a specified agreement milestone and show the responsible official accepting, conditionally accepting or rejecting it. Until then the rival explanations remain ordinary staged development after launch, departmental endorsement without published contractual acceptance, or further review/conditions whose records are not public in this corpus. The present evidence does not select between those explanations.\n\n## Local refinement record\n\nOn 9 September 2026, the prior packet was preserved as `canadian-acceptance-before-institutional-refinement.md` before adding the institutional context already present in retained CAN033380. PDF2 was rendered and visually read; PDF3–4 had already been visually checked. The refinement adds no external acquisition, US award search or new source. See `canadian-acceptance-refinement-receipt.json` for before/after hashes. Acquisition remains closed pending the parent forest assessment.\n",
        "file": "research/tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-canadian-acceptance.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts",
        "title": "TCAP: reported delivery from alerting to reusable infrastructure",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root delivery-account lane closed. This packet reads operator statements and the previously transparency report; Canadian sponsor evidence and product governance are separate lanes. No live product, content database, extremist material, account or access request was opened.",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root delivery-account lane closed. This packet reads operator statements and the previously retained transparency report; Canadian sponsor evidence and product governance are separate lanes. No live product, content database, extremist material, account or access request was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"dated-delivery-statements\">Dated delivery statements</h2>\n<p>The [5 May 2023 launch account](http[local research file] dates the Ottawa presentation to 1 May. TAT described Phase 2 as underway: building an archive and hashes, with new crisis-response/threat-to-life APIs. It attributes a supportive statement to Canada Centre executive Robert Burley and connects the programme to Canada&#x27;s Christchurch Call commitments. This is an event account with attributed government remarks, not a milestone sign-off or payment record. Claimed totals were over 44,000 unique URLs and 25,000 alerts to 100 platforms. The embedded video was not inspected.</p>\n<p>The [21 December 2023 review](http[local research file] authored by Hadley, connects TCAP development to Public Safety Canada support, describes a Microsoft AI-detection pilot, and says Altitude was being built with Google Jigsaw. It also reports an implemented tiered system and alerts covering unofficial supporter-media outlets and attack-preparation material. This supplies an operator account of expanded coverage, rather than making every prospective tier operational. Its claims about policy participation and successful disruption were not independently validated here.</p>\n<p>The [20 December 2024 review](http[local research file] reports an archive exceeding 46,000 files, over 182,000 hashes, and media/URL hash-sharing APIs. It describes a developed LLM for TCAP identification/classification with Public Safety Canada support, and Altitude co-development with Jigsaw. It reports a trusted-flagger programme enabling selected subject specialists to alert designated propaganda. These are attributed implementation claims; the article supplies no model-validation results, project-cost allocation, executed licence or government acceptance. Reported cumulative URLs, alerts, entities and archive counts describe different units and must not be added. The separate Australian-supported crisis team and European programme are not recast as Canadian-funded work.</p>\n<p>The organisation&#x27;s [31 December 2025 update](http[local research file] reports a March 2025 interface relaunch, 10,349 added archive files, one 30-day period with 10,000 alerted URLs, and hash/URL sharing with approximately six major technology companies. It describes systems as auditable but supplies no completed audit. Its account of trained specialist flaggers adds a claimed submission channel. Statements about further AI-company engagement and identifying potentially dangerous individuals are forward-looking priorities, not proof of a deployed population-surveillance system. No recipient roster or case-level removal/restoration evidence is supplied.</p>\n<p>The short [9 January 2023 Jigsaw announcement](http[local research file] describes early collaboration on a prioritisation tool ingesting TCAP URLs. The primary indexed reader delivered the announcement; the ordinary GET returned404. Retained HTML is the error response, not an original of the announcement. The later2023/2024 accounts independently establish what TAT subsequently said about this collaboration; none is independent of TAT as an institution. Actual Altitude stewardship/code is examined in the separate product lane.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-earlier-process-report-actually-explains\">What the earlier process report actually explains</h2>\n<p>The retained [second TCAP transparency report](http[local research file] PDF28–29, describes collection, human verification/classification, database submission, hashing/archiving, advisory email alerts and automated availability checks. Provider moderation is expressly discretionary. Its offline metric tests availability at a submitted source; it is not a direct observation of why the item disappeared. PDF33 distinguishes official group material in the then-policy from supporter content; later expansion should be dated rather than silently projected backward. PDF34 reports public consultation and a legal review commissioned by TAT; the full legal review is privileged and the shorter version requires a request. Neither was acquired. Root additionally read PDF5–6 programme/statistical context in this lane. This limited read does not include every chart or all40 pages.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-changes-and-what-remains-unjoined\">What changes, and what remains unjoined</h2>\n<p>These accounts create a time-ordered delivery trail that fits the disclosed archive/classification/workflow workstreams. That fit is an inference, not a contractual allocation: no acquired budget annex shows which of Altitude, the LLM, the archive or an API was paid from agreement22841. There is no need to invent one fully integrated product to explain the record. A shared archive can supply signals to multiple systems; a workflow tool can mediate provider decisions; government support can fund development while particular data and enforcement decisions remain private. The public product and Canadian lanes must resolve their own parts.</p>\n<p>The highest-value missing evidence is a specific delivery/milestone schedule joined to acceptance and costs, plus the operative rules for classifier selection, access, redistribution and correction. A funding announcement, an operator&#x27;s product statistic and a subsequent offline URL each answer a different question. None alone supplies the intervening command chain.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-finite-search\">Custody and finite search</h2>\n<p>root-delivery-captures.json records three successful original article responses and the launch response, plus the unsuccessful Jigsaw response. The prior report remains in private-verification-wave with SHA2568e41db80e8a9619aa5fccf252b7a831508e34c82c02c924f58c68e79ee5c8d40. No originals were overwritten. Five targeted queries sought later TCAP reporting, Phase2 outputs and Jigsaw/March2025 developments; the first mistakenly used site.techagainstterrorism.org rather than site: and is not counted as successful domain restriction. The initial combined search output truncated; relevant sources were subsequently opened/read in full substantive scope. One mistaken link click returned the same category page; its actual launch link was then read. ISD/ResearchGate snippets were discovery only, not findings. No new broad institutional branch opened.</p>",
        "path": "tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09/delivery-accounts.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2023",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2024",
          "w26-ver-s-tat-review2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root delivery-account lane closed. This packet reads operator statements and the previously retained transparency report; Canadian sponsor evidence and product governance are separate lanes. No live product, content database, extremist material, account or access request was opened.\n\n## Dated delivery statements\n\nThe 5 May 2023 launch account (see source references) dates the Ottawa presentation to 1 May. TAT described Phase 2 as underway: building an archive and hashes, with new crisis-response/threat-to-life APIs. It attributes a supportive statement to Canada Centre executive Robert Burley and connects the programme to Canada's Christchurch Call commitments. This is an event account with attributed government remarks, not a milestone sign-off or payment record. Claimed totals were over 44,000 unique URLs and 25,000 alerts to 100 platforms. The embedded video was not inspected.\n\nThe 21 December 2023 review (see source references) authored by Hadley, connects TCAP development to Public Safety Canada support, describes a Microsoft AI-detection pilot, and says Altitude was being built with Google Jigsaw. It also reports an implemented tiered system and alerts covering unofficial supporter-media outlets and attack-preparation material. This supplies an operator account of expanded coverage, rather than making every prospective tier operational. Its claims about policy participation and successful disruption were not independently validated here.\n\nThe 20 December 2024 review (see source references) reports an archive exceeding 46,000 files, over 182,000 hashes, and media/URL hash-sharing APIs. It describes a developed LLM for TCAP identification/classification with Public Safety Canada support, and Altitude co-development with Jigsaw. It reports a trusted-flagger programme enabling selected subject specialists to alert designated propaganda. These are attributed implementation claims; the article supplies no model-validation results, project-cost allocation, executed licence or government acceptance. Reported cumulative URLs, alerts, entities and archive counts describe different units and must not be added. The separate Australian-supported crisis team and European programme are not recast as Canadian-funded work.\n\nThe organisation's 31 December 2025 update (see source references) reports a March 2025 interface relaunch, 10,349 added archive files, one 30-day period with 10,000 alerted URLs, and hash/URL sharing with approximately six major technology companies. It describes systems as auditable but supplies no completed audit. Its account of trained specialist flaggers adds a claimed submission channel. Statements about further AI-company engagement and identifying potentially dangerous individuals are forward-looking priorities, not proof of a deployed population-surveillance system. No recipient roster or case-level removal/restoration evidence is supplied.\n\nThe short 9 January 2023 Jigsaw announcement (see source references) describes early collaboration on a prioritisation tool ingesting TCAP URLs. The primary indexed reader delivered the announcement; the ordinary GET returned404. Retained HTML is the error response, not an original of the announcement. The later2023/2024 accounts independently establish what TAT subsequently said about this collaboration; none is independent of TAT as an institution. Actual Altitude stewardship/code is examined in the separate product lane.\n\n## What the earlier process report actually explains\n\nThe retained second TCAP transparency report (see source references) PDF28–29, describes collection, human verification/classification, database submission, hashing/archiving, advisory email alerts and automated availability checks. Provider moderation is expressly discretionary. Its offline metric tests availability at a submitted source; it is not a direct observation of why the item disappeared. PDF33 distinguishes official group material in the then-policy from supporter content; later expansion should be dated rather than silently projected backward. PDF34 reports public consultation and a legal review commissioned by TAT; the full legal review is privileged and the shorter version requires a request. Neither was acquired. Root additionally read PDF5–6 programme/statistical context in this lane. This limited read does not include every chart or all40 pages.\n\n## What changes, and what remains unjoined\n\nThese accounts create a time-ordered delivery trail that fits the disclosed archive/classification/workflow workstreams. That fit is an inference, not a contractual allocation: no acquired budget annex shows which of Altitude, the LLM, the archive or an API was paid from agreement22841. There is no need to invent one fully integrated product to explain the record. A shared archive can supply signals to multiple systems; a workflow tool can mediate provider decisions; government support can fund development while particular data and enforcement decisions remain private. The public product and Canadian lanes must resolve their own parts.\n\nThe highest-value missing evidence is a specific delivery/milestone schedule joined to acceptance and costs, plus the operative rules for classifier selection, access, redistribution and correction. A funding announcement, an operator's product statistic and a subsequent offline URL each answer a different question. None alone supplies the intervening command chain.\n\n## Custody and finite search\n\nroot-delivery-captures.json records three successful original article responses and the launch response, plus the unsuccessful Jigsaw response. The prior report remains in private-verification-wave with SHA2568e41db80e8a9619aa5fccf252b7a831508e34c82c02c924f58c68e79ee5c8d40. No originals were overwritten. Five targeted queries sought later TCAP reporting, Phase2 outputs and Jigsaw/March2025 developments; the first mistakenly used site.techagainstterrorism.org rather than site: and is not counted as successful domain restriction. The initial combined search output truncated; relevant sources were subsequently opened/read in full substantive scope. One mistaken link click returned the same category page; its actual launch link was then read. ISD/ResearchGate snippets were discovery only, not findings. No new broad institutional branch opened.\n",
        "file": "research/tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-delivery-accounts.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings",
        "title": "UK age assurance: specific advocacy contributions and decisions",
        "description": "The clearest route is a named contributor working on a specific government amendment, followed by a recorded parliamentary decision. The regulator record supplies a second route: an NGO's identifiable proposal and Ofcom's explicit refusal of its requested criterion architecture. Later 5Rights advocacy links implementation to standards and certification. Thes",
        "html": "<p>Prepared 9 September 2026. Bounded candidate only; case-r10 unchanged.</p>\n<p>The clearest route is a named contributor working on a specific government amendment, followed by a recorded parliamentary decision. The regulator record supplies a second route: an NGO&#x27;s identifiable proposal and Ofcom&#x27;s explicit refusal of its requested criterion architecture. Later 5Rights advocacy links implementation to standards and certification. These are contribution and decision records; they do not identify a common sponsor directing the package, a project-specific funding allocation, or a compulsory identity vendor.</p>\n<h2 id=\"parliament-credited-work-an-agreed-amendment-and-a-limit\">Parliament: credited work, an agreed amendment, and a limit</h2>\n<p>On 6 July 2023, Lord Parkinson thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for months of collaboration on age assurance and specifically credited Kidron&#x27;s work on Amendment 124. Kidron had declared her chair role at 5Rights in the same day&#x27;s debate. This is a contemporaneous NGO/parliamentary bridge and ministerial attribution, stronger than a shared conference appearance. It does not establish sole authorship or which contributor drafted each clause. [Hansard, L1600, L4422, L4436](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>The [official Amendment 124 record](http[local research file] names Parkinson as lead member, Kidron and Clement-Jones as sponsors, and records agreement. Its principles include age/age-range effectiveness, AADC standards, proportionality, interoperability and ease of use; it permits references to industry/technical standards without naming a mandatory certifier. [The 10 July chamber record, L4267–4293](http[local research file] confirms Amendment 124 agreed and Amendment 125 not moved.</p>\n<p>Kidron&#x27;s [Amendment 125](http[local research file] proposed purpose limits and deletion/secure-storage wording. The minister declined that addition, citing existing privacy/data law and concern about legal confusion. Not moved is not a vote defeating it. Kidron also distinguished identifying children through assurance from designing a service safe for children; this does not support describing all her proposals as universal government-ID requirements. [10 July debate, L129, L136–140, L342–371, L405](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"ofcom-a-traceable-request-and-a-mixed-disposition\">Ofcom: a traceable request and a mixed disposition</h2>\n<p>The actual [5Rights Part 5 response, cover March 2024](http[local research file] requested a privacy-preserving criterion, minimal collection, limited retention and security. Its proposed on-device/result-only approach sought to avoid a central identity database linked to online activity (PDF 1–2, 5–7). The response&#x27;s March cover date differs from the consultation page&#x27;s later listing date; no exact submission or upload day is inferred.</p>\n<p>Ofcom explicitly attributed the request to 5Rights in January 2025 statement 3.277–3.278 (PDF/printed 62). It declined the separate criterion because data-protection requirements already apply (3.288, PDF/printed 64), while clarifying design/minimisation guidance and saying both regimes are mandatory (3.289–3.290, PDF/printed 65). The clarification is not attributed solely to 5Rights. Shared primary source: w7-policy-s-statement2025; independently read here from policy-reader-closure1.json and policy-reader-current1.json. Token attribution is retained and independently read in policy-reader-token-attribution.json.</p>\n<p>The <a>17 July 2024 children response</a>.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-standardscertification-seam\">The standards/certification seam</h2>\n<p>The <a>October 2025 additional-measures response</a>.</p>\n<p>This earns an explicit advocacy-to-certification reference. It establishes neither subsequent Ofcom adoption nor a 5Rights–ACCS procurement, payment or clearance agreement. The market lane independently owns legal control and standards roles. Keep ACCS&#x27;s historical umbrella distinct from the newer exact legal nodes. The response does not identify which ACCS legal person would receive business.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-commissioned-work-bridge-to-the-australian-inquiry\">A commissioned-work bridge to the Australian inquiry</h2>\n<p>The market lane&#x27;s acquired [euCONSENT project update, 9 January 2025](http[local research file] reports commissioning a child/human-rights review through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair, with Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads (paragraph beginning &#x27;We have also commissioned&#x27;; captured text line 71). Day, Witting and Livingstone reuse the exact people IDs already documented as authors of the CSEA principles report cited by eSafety.</p>\n<p>This is an actual attributed commission linking named work across the two lanes. It is not a finding that eSafety commissioned AgeAware, that all team academics personally contracted, or that either report determined the regulator&#x27;s text. The review, fee, contract, clearance terms and completed delivery are unknown. &#x27;Independent&#x27; is the commissioning participant&#x27;s description. The commissioning actor remains euCONSENT in the article&#x27;s later-ASBL project context; no original 2021 consortium grant is reassigned.</p>\n<p>Source w7-market-s-ageaware-update reuses the market lane&#x27;s original HTML receipt and hash. Its substantive commission paragraph was independently read here; this supplemental source is distinct from the advocacy lane&#x27;s reader-only acquisitions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"funding-useful-negatives-and-custody\">Funding, useful negatives and custody</h2>\n<p>The current Kidron interests register was read through the public reader and upgrades the existing source src-576f1b1b6fa2 from discovered to scoped read. Its current business, parliamentary-assistance and travel entries do not establish funding of the 2023 amendment work. Existing funding edges must not be earmarked to this UK package without a programme record.</p>\n<p>This bounded pass did not earn new NSPCC, Internet Matters, WeProtect, Fabian or WEF contribution edges. That is a limit of this pass, not evidence they had no relevant role. The policy disagreement and privacy demands challenge a flattening of the record into a single universal-identity campaign; they do not disprove broader power through implementation requirements.</p>\n<p>Five ordinary public GETs returned HTTP 403: both targeted Hansard pages, the July 2024 and October 2025 responses, and the current register. No unchanged-route retries occurred. Public web-reader text was the substitute. Nine reader derivatives preserve scoped text and locators; no original HTML/PDF bytes or original-source hashes are claimed. The March response and official amendment records were likewise read through that public reader. See advocacy-capture-manifest.json and advocacy-derivative-manifest.json. Scopes are attached to each source in advocacy-candidate.json; the findings do not imply full PDF visual review.</p>\n<p>Stop here unless a materially new record appears: contributor/government amendment redlines and clearance records; a programme-specific grant/commission and allocation; or a substantive disposition of the October certification recommendation. No outreach, submission, payment, access workaround or canonical edit occurred. Candidate: seven new nodes, seventeen new edges, seven new sources plus the existing-register access update and one shared market source; three parked, custodian-specific leads. Shared Ofcom source is supplied by the policy lane.</p>",
        "path": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09/advocacy-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "src-576f1b1b6fa2",
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0706",
          "w7-adv-s-hansard0710",
          "w7-adv-s-amend124",
          "w7-adv-s-amend125",
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-part5",
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-child2024",
          "w7-adv-s-5rights-additional2025"
        ],
        "markdown": "Prepared 9 September 2026. Bounded candidate only; case-r10 unchanged.\n\nThe clearest route is a named contributor working on a specific government amendment, followed by a recorded parliamentary decision. The regulator record supplies a second route: an NGO's identifiable proposal and Ofcom's explicit refusal of its requested criterion architecture. Later 5Rights advocacy links implementation to standards and certification. These are contribution and decision records; they do not identify a common sponsor directing the package, a project-specific funding allocation, or a compulsory identity vendor.\n\n## Parliament: credited work, an agreed amendment, and a limit\n\nOn 6 July 2023, Lord Parkinson thanked Kidron, Harding and Bethell for months of collaboration on age assurance and specifically credited Kidron's work on Amendment 124. Kidron had declared her chair role at 5Rights in the same day's debate. This is a contemporaneous NGO/parliamentary bridge and ministerial attribution, stronger than a shared conference appearance. It does not establish sole authorship or which contributor drafted each clause. Hansard, L1600, L4422, L4436 (see source references)\n\nThe official Amendment 124 record (see source references) names Parkinson as lead member, Kidron and Clement-Jones as sponsors, and records agreement. Its principles include age/age-range effectiveness, AADC standards, proportionality, interoperability and ease of use; it permits references to industry/technical standards without naming a mandatory certifier. The 10 July chamber record, L4267–4293 (see source references) confirms Amendment 124 agreed and Amendment 125 not moved.\n\nKidron's Amendment 125 (see source references) proposed purpose limits and deletion/secure-storage wording. The minister declined that addition, citing existing privacy/data law and concern about legal confusion. Not moved is not a vote defeating it. Kidron also distinguished identifying children through assurance from designing a service safe for children; this does not support describing all her proposals as universal government-ID requirements. 10 July debate, L129, L136–140, L342–371, L405 (see source references)\n\n## Ofcom: a traceable request and a mixed disposition\n\nThe actual 5Rights Part 5 response, cover March 2024 (see source references) requested a privacy-preserving criterion, minimal collection, limited retention and security. Its proposed on-device/result-only approach sought to avoid a central identity database linked to online activity (PDF 1–2, 5–7). The response's March cover date differs from the consultation page's later listing date; no exact submission or upload day is inferred.\n\nOfcom explicitly attributed the request to 5Rights in January 2025 statement 3.277–3.278 (PDF/printed 62). It declined the separate criterion because data-protection requirements already apply (3.288, PDF/printed 64), while clarifying design/minimisation guidance and saying both regimes are mandatory (3.289–3.290, PDF/printed 65). The clarification is not attributed solely to 5Rights. Shared primary source: w7-policy-s-statement2025; independently read here from policy-reader-closure1.json and policy-reader-current1.json. Token attribution is retained and independently read in policy-reader-token-attribution.json.\n\nThe 17 July 2024 children response.\n\n## The standards/certification seam\n\nThe October 2025 additional-measures response.\n\nThis earns an explicit advocacy-to-certification reference. It establishes neither subsequent Ofcom adoption nor a 5Rights–ACCS procurement, payment or clearance agreement. The market lane independently owns legal control and standards roles. Keep ACCS's historical umbrella distinct from the newer exact legal nodes. The response does not identify which ACCS legal person would receive business.\n\n## A commissioned-work bridge to the Australian inquiry\n\nThe market lane's acquired euCONSENT project update, 9 January 2025 (see source references) reports commissioning a child/human-rights review through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair, with Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads (paragraph beginning 'We have also commissioned'; captured text line 71). Day, Witting and Livingstone reuse the exact people IDs already documented as authors of the CSEA principles report cited by eSafety.\n\nThis is an actual attributed commission linking named work across the two lanes. It is not a finding that eSafety commissioned AgeAware, that all team academics personally contracted, or that either report determined the regulator's text. The review, fee, contract, clearance terms and completed delivery are unknown. 'Independent' is the commissioning participant's description. The commissioning actor remains euCONSENT in the article's later-ASBL project context; no original 2021 consortium grant is reassigned.\n\nSource w7-market-s-ageaware-update reuses the market lane's original HTML receipt and hash. Its substantive commission paragraph was independently read here; this supplemental source is distinct from the advocacy lane's reader-only acquisitions.\n\n## Funding, useful negatives and custody\n\nThe current Kidron interests register was read through the public reader and upgrades the existing source src-576f1b1b6fa2 from discovered to scoped read. Its current business, parliamentary-assistance and travel entries do not establish funding of the 2023 amendment work. Existing funding edges must not be earmarked to this UK package without a programme record.\n\nThis bounded pass did not earn new NSPCC, Internet Matters, WeProtect, Fabian or WEF contribution edges. That is a limit of this pass, not evidence they had no relevant role. The policy disagreement and privacy demands challenge a flattening of the record into a single universal-identity campaign; they do not disprove broader power through implementation requirements.\n\nFive ordinary public GETs returned HTTP 403: both targeted Hansard pages, the July 2024 and October 2025 responses, and the current register. No unchanged-route retries occurred. Public web-reader text was the substitute. Nine reader derivatives preserve scoped text and locators; no original HTML/PDF bytes or original-source hashes are claimed. The March response and official amendment records were likewise read through that public reader. See advocacy-capture-manifest.json and advocacy-derivative-manifest.json. Scopes are attached to each source in advocacy-candidate.json; the findings do not imply full PDF visual review.\n\nStop here unless a materially new record appears: contributor/government amendment redlines and clearance records; a programme-specific grant/commission and allocation; or a substantive disposition of the October certification recommendation. No outreach, submission, payment, access workaround or canonical edit occurred. Candidate: seven new nodes, seventeen new edges, seven new sources plus the existing-register access update and one shared market source; three parked, custodian-specific leads. Shared Ofcom source is supplied by the policy lane.\n",
        "file": "research/uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-advocacy-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings",
        "title": "UK implementation: platform choice, overlapping regulators and a cancelled national programme",
        "description": "Read on9September2026. This is a bounded public-document account, not a live verification-flow experiment, source-code audit or proof of actual deletion.",
        "html": "<p>Read on9September2026. This is a bounded public-document account, not a live verification-flow experiment, source-code audit or proof of actual deletion.</p>\n<h2 id=\"currentness-correction\">Currentness correction</h2>\n<p>The March2026 Cabinet Office digital-ID consultation proposed online age proof as a use for younger teenagers and said the credential would not be the only permitted method (PDF51–52). It also considered a cross-government identifier (PDF33–34), with boundaries around government use. These are dated proposals. The House of Commons Library briefing dated4September2026 says the national scheme was cancelled21July2026, while OneLogin, Wallet and the private-sector DVS framework are separate. A ministerial answer dated8September explicitly confirms cancellation and says a full business case had not been finalised. Do not project the Marchproposal forward as current policy or claim cancellation removes online-age obligations. The recorded linkage is historical; current private and service-specific routes need separate tracing.</p>\n<p>Original91page consultation PDF captured; scoped read PDF32–34,39–40,51–52,81–83. Library and minister pages read through web reader; originalGET403, no retry, derivative observations only. The Library statement about continuing other systems is an institutional summary, not verification of every component&#x27;s live deployment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"reddit-named-processor-and-constrained-claims\">Reddit: named processor and constrained claims</h2>\n<p>Current Reddit Help, updated24June2026, names Persona for ID/selfie verification, describes account-signal and third-party email inference, and lists app-store age signals depending on region/device. This generic page does not establish that every option is available to every UK user. Reddit says it stores verified age/status and receives no verification photos. The customer-specific Persona FAQ identifies Reddit as controller and Persona as processor under Reddit&#x27;s instructions; it says ID-route birthdate or selfie-route estimated age is returned and personal information deleted within three days. These are published provider representations; contractual schedules and deletion evidence were not obtained. The date of birth return should not be reduced to a universal binary over18 token.</p>\n<p>Persona&#x27;s original FAQ HTML was captured; Reddit ordinaryGET403, readable web substitute retained as derivative. No guessed email-inference supplier, fee or link to VerifyMy is earned. Current provider summaries must not be backdated to2025 retention arrangements.</p>\n<h2 id=\"a-second-regulatory-mechanism-with-a-specific-period\">A second regulatory mechanism, with a specific period</h2>\n<p>The ICO&#x27;s signed penalty notice23February2026 imposes GBP14,472,500 for specified UKGDPR infringements. Its processing period ends8July2025; its DPIA period ends31December2024. Paragraph74/PDF40 records Reddit&#x27;s UK NSFW age-verification through Persona starting14July2025, after the relevant period. Paragraph301(a)/PDF152 expressly rejects treating later OSA compliance work as mitigation of those earlier infringements. Thus the fine was not an OSA fine for deploying Persona incorrectly, and the notice does not direct procurement of Persona.</p>\n<p>The ICO&#x27;s1April2026 update records an appeal. No tribunal disposition was established in the scoped current-source review. No receipt of penalty payment is claimed. The source includes a dispute over pseudonymity and additional data in paragraphs71–74/PDF38–40. This is an actual opposing platform position, not analyst speculation.</p>\n<p>The ICO&#x27;s separate FOIresponse24March2026 says it holds regular Ofcom meetings, varying by team from fortnightly to quarterly, while refusing a broad multi-year request on burden grounds. That establishes a reported coordination routine, not that every meeting concerned Reddit. It identifies normally generated records worth seeking with a much narrower time/topic boundary. The refusal is not evidence of concealed misconduct.</p>\n<p>Original209page penalty and8pageFOI PDFs retained. Scoped penalty reading: PDF4–11 introduction/periods,38–40 age-gating and competing position,42–43 controller/period discussion,134 and152 mitigation. No full annex, statistical or tax/financial audit. ICOpressHTML captured and read for penalty and appeal update. FOIpp1–7read request, response, meeting description and assistance; individual requested categories are not all confirmed held.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discord-feature-gates-rather-than-account-wide-identity-entry\">Discord: feature gates rather than account-wide identity entry</h2>\n<p>The UK-specific help page updated28July2026 names k-ID and describes age checks to unblur flagged media, access age-restricted spaces and change certain settings, including MessageRequests. It says those declining retain account, DMs, voice, friends and servers, with the stated restrictions. It describes on-device facial estimation, document checks and a GoogleWallet test; methods are not interchangeable disclosures. This refines existing Discord/k-ID/Wallet edges rather than inventing another deployment. Its privacy and deletion statements are company claims, not tested properties.</p>\n<p>OriginalGET403; web-reader body read, derivative only. Existing general Discord source and historic age-appeal support exposure remain separate. Do not treat the historic support breach as a new compromise of the normal UK verification path.</p>\n<h2 id=\"maximum-value-missing-records\">Maximum-value missing records</h2>\n<p>Reddit–Persona processing schedule, age-output schema and retention/deletion settings would identify the actual controller instructions and retained fields. The UK rollout/configuration record would establish which alternative routes work there. A dated ICO–Ofcom age-assurance meeting agenda/action log near July2025 would test specific coordination without requesting years of unrelated material. Discord&#x27;s UK change/requirement mapping would show which feature restrictions were platform choices and how these relate to statutory duties. No outreach, submission, paid access or logged-in flow was undertaken.</p>",
        "path": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09/implementation-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-impl-s-reddit",
          "w7-impl-s-persona",
          "w7-impl-s-discord",
          "w7-impl-s-penalty",
          "w7-impl-s-appeal",
          "w7-impl-s-foi",
          "w7-impl-s-consultation",
          "w7-impl-s-library",
          "w7-impl-s-minister"
        ],
        "markdown": "Read on9September2026. This is a bounded public-document account, not a live verification-flow experiment, source-code audit or proof of actual deletion.\n\n## Currentness correction\n\nThe March2026 Cabinet Office digital-ID consultation proposed online age proof as a use for younger teenagers and said the credential would not be the only permitted method (PDF51–52). It also considered a cross-government identifier (PDF33–34), with boundaries around government use. These are dated proposals. The House of Commons Library briefing dated4September2026 says the national scheme was cancelled21July2026, while OneLogin, Wallet and the private-sector DVS framework are separate. A ministerial answer dated8September explicitly confirms cancellation and says a full business case had not been finalised. Do not project the Marchproposal forward as current policy or claim cancellation removes online-age obligations. The recorded linkage is historical; current private and service-specific routes need separate tracing.\n\nOriginal91page consultation PDF captured; scoped read PDF32–34,39–40,51–52,81–83. Library and minister pages read through web reader; originalGET403, no retry, derivative observations only. The Library statement about continuing other systems is an institutional summary, not verification of every component's live deployment.\n\n## Reddit: named processor and constrained claims\n\nCurrent Reddit Help, updated24June2026, names Persona for ID/selfie verification, describes account-signal and third-party email inference, and lists app-store age signals depending on region/device. This generic page does not establish that every option is available to every UK user. Reddit says it stores verified age/status and receives no verification photos. The customer-specific Persona FAQ identifies Reddit as controller and Persona as processor under Reddit's instructions; it says ID-route birthdate or selfie-route estimated age is returned and personal information deleted within three days. These are published provider representations; contractual schedules and deletion evidence were not obtained. The date of birth return should not be reduced to a universal binary over18 token.\n\nPersona's original FAQ HTML was captured; Reddit ordinaryGET403, readable web substitute retained as derivative. No guessed email-inference supplier, fee or link to VerifyMy is earned. Current provider summaries must not be backdated to2025 retention arrangements.\n\n## A second regulatory mechanism, with a specific period\n\nThe ICO's signed penalty notice23February2026 imposes GBP14,472,500 for specified UKGDPR infringements. Its processing period ends8July2025; its DPIA period ends31December2024. Paragraph74/PDF40 records Reddit's UK NSFW age-verification through Persona starting14July2025, after the relevant period. Paragraph301(a)/PDF152 expressly rejects treating later OSA compliance work as mitigation of those earlier infringements. Thus the fine was not an OSA fine for deploying Persona incorrectly, and the notice does not direct procurement of Persona.\n\nThe ICO's1April2026 update records an appeal. No tribunal disposition was established in the scoped current-source review. No receipt of penalty payment is claimed. The source includes a dispute over pseudonymity and additional data in paragraphs71–74/PDF38–40. This is an actual opposing platform position, not analyst speculation.\n\nThe ICO's separate FOIresponse24March2026 says it holds regular Ofcom meetings, varying by team from fortnightly to quarterly, while refusing a broad multi-year request on burden grounds. That establishes a reported coordination routine, not that every meeting concerned Reddit. It identifies normally generated records worth seeking with a much narrower time/topic boundary. The refusal is not evidence of concealed misconduct.\n\nOriginal209page penalty and8pageFOI PDFs retained. Scoped penalty reading: PDF4–11 introduction/periods,38–40 age-gating and competing position,42–43 controller/period discussion,134 and152 mitigation. No full annex, statistical or tax/financial audit. ICOpressHTML captured and read for penalty and appeal update. FOIpp1–7read request, response, meeting description and assistance; individual requested categories are not all confirmed held.\n\n## Discord: feature gates rather than account-wide identity entry\n\nThe UK-specific help page updated28July2026 names k-ID and describes age checks to unblur flagged media, access age-restricted spaces and change certain settings, including MessageRequests. It says those declining retain account, DMs, voice, friends and servers, with the stated restrictions. It describes on-device facial estimation, document checks and a GoogleWallet test; methods are not interchangeable disclosures. This refines existing Discord/k-ID/Wallet edges rather than inventing another deployment. Its privacy and deletion statements are company claims, not tested properties.\n\nOriginalGET403; web-reader body read, derivative only. Existing general Discord source and historic age-appeal support exposure remain separate. Do not treat the historic support breach as a new compromise of the normal UK verification path.\n\n## Maximum-value missing records\n\nReddit–Persona processing schedule, age-output schema and retention/deletion settings would identify the actual controller instructions and retained fields. The UK rollout/configuration record would establish which alternative routes work there. A dated ICO–Ofcom age-assurance meeting agenda/action log near July2025 would test specific coordination without requesting years of unrelated material. Discord's UK change/requirement mapping would show which feature restrictions were platform choices and how these relate to statutory duties. No outreach, submission, paid access or logged-in flow was undertaken.\n",
        "file": "research/uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-implementation-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings",
        "title": "UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits",
        "description": "Prepared 9 September 2026 (America/Chicago). Candidate acquisition only; case-r10 unchanged.",
        "html": "<p>Prepared 9 September 2026 (America/Chicago). Candidate acquisition only; case-r10 unchanged.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-this-pass-adds\">What this pass adds</h2>\n<p>The strongest new structure is not a speculative relationship between national digital ID and age checks. It is a documented commercial certification business, its control over the separately incorporated nonprofit scheme, its principal&#x27;s standards-editing role, and a funded interoperability project&#x27;s explicit proposed commercial and admission rules. The source record supports these distinct relationships. It does not establish regulatory capture, compulsory use of ACCS, a monopoly, or deployment of every proposed AgeAware feature.</p>\n<h2 id=\"1-the-legal-control-arrow-matters\">1. The legal control arrow matters</h2>\n<p>The existing node accs combines a brand, scheme and service provider. The current ACCS governance page identifies Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd (11493870), a nonprofit company limited by guarantee, and says audit, certification and test purchasing are supplied under a Service Level Agreement by AVID Certification Services Limited (14865982). These are not interchangeable legal persons.</p>\n<p>Companies House&#x27;s current scheme-company PSC page lists AVID as the active corporate controller, notified 1 June 2023, with director appointment/removal rights. AVID&#x27;s PSC page lists Tony Iain Allen, notified 12 May 2023, with more than 50% but less than 75% of shares and voting rights and director appointment/removal rights; Nicholas John Bate, notified 14 July 2023, holds more than 25% but no more than 50% of shares and votes. These are disclosed control bands, not exact stakes. The register also contains an earlier ceased Nick Bate entry. We have not inspected the change filings; do not count that entry as another independent owner or turn it into an unexplained beneficial-owner departure.</p>\n<p>This earns an ownership/control path: Allen -&gt; AVID -&gt; scheme-company directors. It does not establish Allen personally decided any named certificate, Australian trial result, standard clause or regulatory disposition. The SLA&#x27;s payment, indemnity, renewal and termination provisions remain unacquired.</p>\n<p>Sources: market-avid-psc.html, current active entries; market-scheme-psc.html, active AVID entry; market-accs-governance.html, Financial support and legal footer. Exact originals, URLs and SHA-256 are in market-captures.jsonl and market-candidate.json.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2-certification-creates-repeat-commercial-relationships-with-safeguards\">2. Certification creates repeat commercial relationships, with safeguards</h2>\n<p>The 2026 General Scheme Rules are an actual published operating instrument. Sections 6.24-6.27 and 7 (PDF20) put the decision with a certification officer employed by the assessment body and separate from the evaluator; the decision cannot be outsourced. Section14 (PDF33) sets individually supplied fee schedules, invoices due within 28 days and annual fee review. Failure to pay is a listed nonconformity, alongside technical and audit failures (10.8, PDF25). Withdrawal entails loss of the certificate, registry entry and mark, plus notifications to relevant regulators (10.9). Recertification is at most two years apart (4.7, PDF10). The governance page says certification fees are the main income source.</p>\n<p>The same rules provide meaningful limits: an independent appeal panel can uphold, remit or revoke decisions (11.18-11.20, PDF29); an impartiality panel includes the chief executive and at least two independent members (12.4, PDF30). The assessment body must not design or provide the certified product/service, clients must not manage certification, association membership cannot be a condition, and decision personnel face a two-year prior-client/consultancy restriction (12.6-12.11, PDF30-31). These are stated safeguards, not independently tested implementation. No executed customer agreement, individual invoice or certifier profit allocation was obtained.</p>\n<p>The source is headed ACCS0:2026 but retains an old 0:2020 header fragment. We treat the downloaded 2026 instrument as current-source evidence, not proof these exact clauses governed a 2024 or July2025 decision. Its own numerical classifications are scheme criteria, not automatically Ofcom&#x27;s thresholds.</p>\n<h2 id=\"3-a-standards-editor-is-also-a-certification-business-principal\">3. A standards editor is also a certification-business principal</h2>\n<p>BSI&#x27;s event page for 23 October2025 identifies Tony Allen as ACCS Executive Director, lead editor of ISO/IEC27566-1 and chair of BSI panel IST/33/5/5 (Tony Allen speaker biography). The standard&#x27;s commercial certification is now advertised on ACCS&#x27;s own site. BSI&#x27;s 3 February2026 announcement describes UK editorial and committee input and a technology-neutral framework that does not always require full identity verification.</p>\n<p>This is a specific overlap of commercial and standard-setting roles. It does not mean a sole author, unilateral standards approval or a statutory vendor appointment. The ISO record lists publication in December2025; its ordinary public GET returned403. BSI&#x27;s official announcement was the single substitute retained. The full paid standard was not purchased/read. Do not backdate the final standard to the July2025 UK implementation deadline.</p>\n<p>VerifyMy&#x27;s current product page names its legal operator as VerifyMy Limited, 12050874. It sells email-age estimation using an email, ownership checks and digital-footprint analysis, with background account-creation/checkout and explicit age-gate variants. It reports ACCS certification of its platform under ACCS1:2025 incorporating ISO27566-1. This is a provider&#x27;s certification claim, not independent inspection of its certificate or algorithm. It supplies no price, profit, customer list or assignment to Reddit.</p>\n<p>Policy lane separately owns the Ofcom January2025 disposition crediting AVPA/VerifyMy evidence for adding email estimation. That is actual method-level uptake; it is not evidence VerifyMy supplies every platform using the method. Ofcom&#x27;s refusal to make independent certification compulsory or automatically sufficient must accompany any combined narrative.</p>\n<h2 id=\"4-ageaware-proposed-a-market-constitution-not-just-a-token-format\">4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format</h2>\n<p>The acquired original is the AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, WP1 Business Requirements, version1.0, dated5 August2024, 25pages. Cover authors are Iain Corby, Alastair Graham (design authority pro tem) and Ben Gower (technical architect). PDF2&#x27;s document-control table names T Allen of ACCS as the required approver and R Kiddle of ACCS as reviewer. The Action column identifies Approver/Reviewer; completion Date cells are blank and no signed approval is shown. It is an intended approval chain, not evidence that Allen signed or approved the final implementation. AVPA, Yoti, AgeChecked and VerifyMy are named proposed reviewers. The January9,2025 euCONSENT account subsequently says the three providers worked on detailed design; these are separate evidence states.</p>\n<p>The proposal is sponsored by Safe Online and delivered by the Belgian nonprofit euCONSENT ASBL (cover and1.9, PDF3). It builds on an earlier European Commission-funded consortium project; do not backdate ASBL as the original 2021 grant recipient. The reported project-level funding purpose is established. The executed grant agreement, amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain unacquired; a separately encountered $2million figure belongs to a ten-project portfolio and is not assigned here.</p>\n<p>Its proposed operating provisions are concrete:\n* The ASBL board sets admission/certification requirements, applies a fit-and-proper test and is elected by members, then limited to original project participants (5.1, PDF9-10).\n* The secretariat collects cost-recovery licensing fees; a commercial steering group may recommend restrictions on below-cost or negative pricing, expressly subject to competition law (5.3/5.5, PDF10-11).\n* Usage tallies support provider billing and cross-charging while withholding individual commercial prices/commissions from the tally system. AgeAware controls tally access and can pause/remove participants or blacklist tokens (6.4-6.5, PDF15-16).\n* Limited funds motivate negotiated initial exclusivity for core-component suppliers and a proposed three-year exclusive independent commercial scheme, followed by contestability (14.3-14.5, PDF23).\n* Proposed contracts limit third-party and nonprofit liability; further provisions need committee input and board approval (15.2, PDF24).</p>\n<p>These provisions locate design-stage discretion and intended revenue, not actual invoices, procurement awards or legally tested competition effects. They also state rival public-interest purposes: repeatable low-cost checks, provider choice, anonymity, security and long-run competition. Those objectives and the privacy design have not been independently technically audited in this pass.</p>\n<p>January2025&#x27;s project update reports completed issuer/key/relying-party/tally services, with anonymisation/app and scaling still in progress. Current AVPA text says development continued until2025 and that euCONSENT&#x27;s demonstration mission is fulfilled with private-sector alternatives available. Thus no candidate claims AgeAware currently operates as a mandatory gate. Its design also included regulatory sandboxes and Australia trial consideration; an offered/tendered solution is not an award.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-most-useful-unresolved-junction\">The most useful unresolved junction</h2>\n<p>The 2024 draft naming an ACCS approver and using ACCS as an example auditor creates a precise question when read beside the 2026 scheme&#x27;s prohibition on designing what it certifies. It is not evidence of a breach: dates differ, approval was not shown completed, the ultimate delivered product/assessor is unknown, and independent assessment could have been arranged. The missing records are the final approved specification, actual implementation/procurement contracts and assessor appointment, the applicable dated impartiality assessment/recusal record, and any final certification decision.</p>\n<h2 id=\"source-custody-boundaries-and-next-records\">Source custody, boundaries and next records</h2>\n<p>All retained successful originals have ordinary public GET receipts, timestamps and hashes. HTML text derivatives remove script/style content; PDF derivatives use pypdf and page markers. See each candidate source&#x27;s reading_extent: this is scoped substantive reading, not an assertion that every navigation item, technical security requirement or filing history was reviewed.</p>\n<p>Closed access branches: the ISO original page returned403; official BSI was used once instead. The separate ACCS impartiality-page web route failed; the accessible full scheme rules supplied the operative provisions. A search for a directly accessible EU executed grant did not yield the award instrument; the captured recipient/trade-association funding acknowledgements remain attributed. No current acquirer roster, national-ID dependency, MindGeek continuity or investor speculation was imported.</p>\n<p>High-value records still with identifiable custodians: AVID/scheme SLA and current certified-client contract template; dated impartiality risk register and relevant determinations; euCONSENT/Safe Online grant schedule and acceptance conditions; final post-consultation AgeAware specification and signed approval table; actual exclusivity award, fee schedules and operating/termination history. Public interest can be served by ordinary publication of these instruments; this lane performed no outreach.</p>\n<h2 id=\"integration-instructions\">Integration instructions</h2>\n<p>Keep accs as a historical umbrella and add exact legal nodes; do not duplicate the existing A$3,830,277 Australia award as new money or retarget older ambiguous ACCS assertions without the original named entity. Preserve the original consortium/ASBL chronology in euconsent. Yoti and AgeChecked here are credited provider brands, not newly researched legal subsidiaries. Reported self-certification, proposed approval, actual published rules and registered control must remain distinct. Current national digital-ID policy is outside this lane and is not a prerequisite for any relationship claimed here.</p>",
        "path": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09/market-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-market-s-avid-psc",
          "w7-market-s-scheme-psc",
          "w7-market-s-governance",
          "w7-market-s-rules",
          "w7-market-s-bsi-roles",
          "w7-market-s-bsi-standard",
          "w7-market-s-iso-service",
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-spec",
          "w7-market-s-ageaware-update",
          "w7-market-s-avpa-project",
          "w7-market-s-verifymy"
        ],
        "markdown": "Prepared 9 September 2026 (America/Chicago). Candidate acquisition only; case-r10 unchanged.\n\n## What this pass adds\n\nThe strongest new structure is not a speculative relationship between national digital ID and age checks. It is a documented commercial certification business, its control over the separately incorporated nonprofit scheme, its principal's standards-editing role, and a funded interoperability project's explicit proposed commercial and admission rules. The source record supports these distinct relationships. It does not establish regulatory capture, compulsory use of ACCS, a monopoly, or deployment of every proposed AgeAware feature.\n\n## 1. The legal control arrow matters\n\nThe existing node accs combines a brand, scheme and service provider. The current ACCS governance page identifies Age Check Certification Scheme Ltd (11493870), a nonprofit company limited by guarantee, and says audit, certification and test purchasing are supplied under a Service Level Agreement by AVID Certification Services Limited (14865982). These are not interchangeable legal persons.\n\nCompanies House's current scheme-company PSC page lists AVID as the active corporate controller, notified 1 June 2023, with director appointment/removal rights. AVID's PSC page lists Tony Iain Allen, notified 12 May 2023, with more than 50% but less than 75% of shares and voting rights and director appointment/removal rights; Nicholas John Bate, notified 14 July 2023, holds more than 25% but no more than 50% of shares and votes. These are disclosed control bands, not exact stakes. The register also contains an earlier ceased Nick Bate entry. We have not inspected the change filings; do not count that entry as another independent owner or turn it into an unexplained beneficial-owner departure.\n\nThis earns an ownership/control path: Allen -> AVID -> scheme-company directors. It does not establish Allen personally decided any named certificate, Australian trial result, standard clause or regulatory disposition. The SLA's payment, indemnity, renewal and termination provisions remain unacquired.\n\nSources: market-avid-psc.html, current active entries; market-scheme-psc.html, active AVID entry; market-accs-governance.html, Financial support and legal footer. Exact originals, URLs and SHA-256 are in market-captures.jsonl and market-candidate.json.\n\n## 2. Certification creates repeat commercial relationships, with safeguards\n\nThe 2026 General Scheme Rules are an actual published operating instrument. Sections 6.24-6.27 and 7 (PDF20) put the decision with a certification officer employed by the assessment body and separate from the evaluator; the decision cannot be outsourced. Section14 (PDF33) sets individually supplied fee schedules, invoices due within 28 days and annual fee review. Failure to pay is a listed nonconformity, alongside technical and audit failures (10.8, PDF25). Withdrawal entails loss of the certificate, registry entry and mark, plus notifications to relevant regulators (10.9). Recertification is at most two years apart (4.7, PDF10). The governance page says certification fees are the main income source.\n\nThe same rules provide meaningful limits: an independent appeal panel can uphold, remit or revoke decisions (11.18-11.20, PDF29); an impartiality panel includes the chief executive and at least two independent members (12.4, PDF30). The assessment body must not design or provide the certified product/service, clients must not manage certification, association membership cannot be a condition, and decision personnel face a two-year prior-client/consultancy restriction (12.6-12.11, PDF30-31). These are stated safeguards, not independently tested implementation. No executed customer agreement, individual invoice or certifier profit allocation was obtained.\n\nThe source is headed ACCS0:2026 but retains an old 0:2020 header fragment. We treat the downloaded 2026 instrument as current-source evidence, not proof these exact clauses governed a 2024 or July2025 decision. Its own numerical classifications are scheme criteria, not automatically Ofcom's thresholds.\n\n## 3. A standards editor is also a certification-business principal\n\nBSI's event page for 23 October2025 identifies Tony Allen as ACCS Executive Director, lead editor of ISO/IEC27566-1 and chair of BSI panel IST/33/5/5 (Tony Allen speaker biography). The standard's commercial certification is now advertised on ACCS's own site. BSI's 3 February2026 announcement describes UK editorial and committee input and a technology-neutral framework that does not always require full identity verification.\n\nThis is a specific overlap of commercial and standard-setting roles. It does not mean a sole author, unilateral standards approval or a statutory vendor appointment. The ISO record lists publication in December2025; its ordinary public GET returned403. BSI's official announcement was the single substitute retained. The full paid standard was not purchased/read. Do not backdate the final standard to the July2025 UK implementation deadline.\n\nVerifyMy's current product page names its legal operator as VerifyMy Limited, 12050874. It sells email-age estimation using an email, ownership checks and digital-footprint analysis, with background account-creation/checkout and explicit age-gate variants. It reports ACCS certification of its platform under ACCS1:2025 incorporating ISO27566-1. This is a provider's certification claim, not independent inspection of its certificate or algorithm. It supplies no price, profit, customer list or assignment to Reddit.\n\nPolicy lane separately owns the Ofcom January2025 disposition crediting AVPA/VerifyMy evidence for adding email estimation. That is actual method-level uptake; it is not evidence VerifyMy supplies every platform using the method. Ofcom's refusal to make independent certification compulsory or automatically sufficient must accompany any combined narrative.\n\n## 4. AgeAware proposed a market constitution, not just a token format\n\nThe acquired original is the AgeAware Specification Consultation Document, WP1 Business Requirements, version1.0, dated5 August2024, 25pages. Cover authors are Iain Corby, Alastair Graham (design authority pro tem) and Ben Gower (technical architect). PDF2's document-control table names T Allen of ACCS as the required approver and R Kiddle of ACCS as reviewer. The Action column identifies Approver/Reviewer; completion Date cells are blank and no signed approval is shown. It is an intended approval chain, not evidence that Allen signed or approved the final implementation. AVPA, Yoti, AgeChecked and VerifyMy are named proposed reviewers. The January9,2025 euCONSENT account subsequently says the three providers worked on detailed design; these are separate evidence states.\n\nThe proposal is sponsored by Safe Online and delivered by the Belgian nonprofit euCONSENT ASBL (cover and1.9, PDF3). It builds on an earlier European Commission-funded consortium project; do not backdate ASBL as the original 2021 grant recipient. The reported project-level funding purpose is established. The executed grant agreement, amount, subproject/vendor allocation, ultimate donor allocation and clearance/acceptance rights remain unacquired; a separately encountered $2million figure belongs to a ten-project portfolio and is not assigned here.\n\nIts proposed operating provisions are concrete:\n* The ASBL board sets admission/certification requirements, applies a fit-and-proper test and is elected by members, then limited to original project participants (5.1, PDF9-10).\n* The secretariat collects cost-recovery licensing fees; a commercial steering group may recommend restrictions on below-cost or negative pricing, expressly subject to competition law (5.3/5.5, PDF10-11).\n* Usage tallies support provider billing and cross-charging while withholding individual commercial prices/commissions from the tally system. AgeAware controls tally access and can pause/remove participants or blacklist tokens (6.4-6.5, PDF15-16).\n* Limited funds motivate negotiated initial exclusivity for core-component suppliers and a proposed three-year exclusive independent commercial scheme, followed by contestability (14.3-14.5, PDF23).\n* Proposed contracts limit third-party and nonprofit liability; further provisions need committee input and board approval (15.2, PDF24).\n\nThese provisions locate design-stage discretion and intended revenue, not actual invoices, procurement awards or legally tested competition effects. They also state rival public-interest purposes: repeatable low-cost checks, provider choice, anonymity, security and long-run competition. Those objectives and the privacy design have not been independently technically audited in this pass.\n\nJanuary2025's project update reports completed issuer/key/relying-party/tally services, with anonymisation/app and scaling still in progress. Current AVPA text says development continued until2025 and that euCONSENT's demonstration mission is fulfilled with private-sector alternatives available. Thus no candidate claims AgeAware currently operates as a mandatory gate. Its design also included regulatory sandboxes and Australia trial consideration; an offered/tendered solution is not an award.\n\n## The most useful unresolved junction\n\nThe 2024 draft naming an ACCS approver and using ACCS as an example auditor creates a precise question when read beside the 2026 scheme's prohibition on designing what it certifies. It is not evidence of a breach: dates differ, approval was not shown completed, the ultimate delivered product/assessor is unknown, and independent assessment could have been arranged. The missing records are the final approved specification, actual implementation/procurement contracts and assessor appointment, the applicable dated impartiality assessment/recusal record, and any final certification decision.\n\n## Source custody, boundaries and next records\n\nAll retained successful originals have ordinary public GET receipts, timestamps and hashes. HTML text derivatives remove script/style content; PDF derivatives use pypdf and page markers. See each candidate source's reading_extent: this is scoped substantive reading, not an assertion that every navigation item, technical security requirement or filing history was reviewed.\n\nClosed access branches: the ISO original page returned403; official BSI was used once instead. The separate ACCS impartiality-page web route failed; the accessible full scheme rules supplied the operative provisions. A search for a directly accessible EU executed grant did not yield the award instrument; the captured recipient/trade-association funding acknowledgements remain attributed. No current acquirer roster, national-ID dependency, MindGeek continuity or investor speculation was imported.\n\nHigh-value records still with identifiable custodians: AVID/scheme SLA and current certified-client contract template; dated impartiality risk register and relevant determinations; euCONSENT/Safe Online grant schedule and acceptance conditions; final post-consultation AgeAware specification and signed approval table; actual exclusivity award, fee schedules and operating/termination history. Public interest can be served by ordinary publication of these instruments; this lane performed no outreach.\n\n## Integration instructions\n\nKeep accs as a historical umbrella and add exact legal nodes; do not duplicate the existing A$3,830,277 Australia award as new money or retarget older ambiguous ACCS assertions without the original named entity. Preserve the original consortium/ASBL chronology in euconsent. Yoti and AgeChecked here are credited provider brands, not newly researched legal subsidiaries. Reported self-certification, proposed approval, actual published rules and registered control must remain distinct. Current national digital-ID policy is outside this lane and is not a prerequisite for any relationship claimed here.\n",
        "file": "research/uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-market-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings",
        "title": "UK age assurance: statutory chain and consequential choices",
        "description": "As observed 9 September 2026, the Online Safety Act duties and Ofcom's implementation require highly effective age assurance (HEAA) for defined services and harmful-content risks. They do not create a universal identification requirement for everyone using the internet. The consequential influence record is unusually explicit: Ofcom credited AVPA and VerifyM",
        "html": "<p>As observed 9 September 2026, the Online Safety Act duties and Ofcom&#x27;s implementation require highly effective age assurance (HEAA) for defined services and harmful-content risks. They do not create a universal identification requirement for everyone using the internet. The consequential influence record is unusually explicit: Ofcom credited AVPA and VerifyMy evidence when adding email-based age estimation to its examples of methods capable of HEAA. That is acceptance of a method-level contribution, not approval of the company, procurement, demonstrated deployment performance or evidence of a payment.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-legal-chain\">The legal chain</h2>\n<p>The [Online Safety Act 2023](http[local research file] assented to on 26 October 2023, defines a child as under 18 (section 236, PDF 218/printed 204). Section 230 (PDF 212/printed 198) distinguishes verifying exact age from estimating age or age-range; a bare self-declaration is neither. Identity-document matching is one possible method. Facial age estimation is another. The final Part 5 guidance explains that open banking can pass an over-18 result without passing date of birth or other information to the relying service (paragraph 4.12, PDF 17). A token can communicate a completed age check; it is not itself the underlying age-assurance method.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Decision or duty</th>\n<th>Precise scope and timing</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>OSA section 81, [current official text](http[local research file]</td>\n<td>Part 5 provider-published pornography: use verification/estimation so children are not normally able to encounter it; method and deployment must be highly effective. Also record methods/privacy consideration and publish a summary. Official commencement annotation: 17 January 2025, SI 2024/1333 regulation 2(1)(a).</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OSA section 12, [current official text](http[local research file]</td>\n<td>User-to-user services likely to be accessed by children: proportionate protection duties. Sections 12(4)–(6) require HEAA for identified primary-priority content unless that kind is prohibited for all users by the terms. A prohibition does not remove the broader protection duties. This covers more than pornography: section 61 includes suicide, self-injury and eating-disorder encouragement/instructions.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OSA sections 35–36</td>\n<td>All Part 3 user-to-user and search services assess children&#x27;s access. The statutory test examines actual use/likely attraction, not just the intended audience. Claiming children cannot access requires verification/estimation that actually excludes them. Initial access-assessment deadline: 16 April 2025.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>OSA section 82 and Schedule 4 paragraph 12</td>\n<td>Ofcom must give Part 5 guidance with examples and compliance principles; the children&#x27;s codes must recommend HEAA for the section 12(3)(a) duty and have regard to that guidance. Statutory guidance obligation is distinct from certification of vendors.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Final Protection of Children Code</td>\n<td>Statement/guidance 24 April 2025; issued code cover dated 4 July 2025 and in force 25 July 2025. Initial children&#x27;s risk-assessment deadline 24 July 2025. See [issued user-to-user code](http[local research file]</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The section 12 commencement annotation says 10 January 2024. That should not be confused with the operational compliance deadline after the statutory assessment/code process: Ofcom&#x27;s dated implementation table and enforcement case expressly identify 25 July 2025 for these children&#x27;s safety duties. The [current implementation dates table](http[local research file] preserves the sequence.</p>\n<p>The code&#x27;s recommendations are a statutory route to compliance, not every word a freestanding legislative prohibition. OSA section 49(1) treats relevant recommended measures as compliance;49(5)–(6) accommodates alternative measures subject to scrutiny and privacy/expression safeguards. Section 50(1) says failure to follow a code provision does not itself create court/tribunal liability. The underlying duties remain mandatory.</p>\n<p>The issued code, PDF 20–27 (printed 21–28), distinguishes service-wide adult access controls for services principally hosting primary-priority/priority harmful content (PCU B2/B3) from content/feed protections (B4–B7). For B4–B7 it allows appropriate restrictions to remain on users who do not elect to prove adulthood, rather than demanding a document from every user. Each measure has its own content/risk/functionality conditions; B7 excludes bullying from its priority-content trigger. Search services have children&#x27;s-access and protection duties, but not the same HEAA duty as user-to-user services to prevent access to pornography. Ofcom&#x27;s July 2026 report paragraph 4.34, PDF 31, makes that distinction expressly.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-consultation-actually-changed\">What consultation actually changed</h2>\n<p>The [16 January 2025 statement](http[local research file] provides the decision record. Its currently linked attachment carries a 16 May 2025 listing date, while the PDF cover says16 January 2025; no new decision date is inferred from the media listing or URL query.</p>\n<p>Paragraphs 3.85–3.87, PDF 27: AVPA/VerifyMy evidence supported adding email-based estimation, conditional on effective implementation. Paragraphs 3.103–3.105, PDF 30–31: token references were added, retaining responsibility for the underlying check and sharing process. The preceding response summary, paragraphs 3.66–3.68 and footnote 94 on PDF 24, attributes the token recommendation to 5Rights, Yoti and the ACT App Association. Paragraph 3.108, PDF 31, and 3.350–3.353, PDF 76–77: certification can evidence compliance but is neither compulsory nor automatic; Ofcom did not adopt Yoti&#x27;s request to mandate independent testing/certification. Paragraphs 3.243–3.259, PDF 54–57: requested numerical thresholds were declined at that stage, citing inadequate comparable evidence/testing and market-development concerns. Paragraphs 3.277–3.290, PDF 62–65: 5Rights&#x27; separate privacy-criterion proposal was declined because existing data-protection law applied; design/minimisation guidance was strengthened. None of these outcomes proves a private bargain or sole authorship.</p>\n<p>The [April 2025 children&#x27;s statement Volume 4](http[local research file] paragraphs 13.343–13.357, PDF 204–207, separately handles behavioural age inference. It rejected adding inference to the HEAA examples: evidence of efficacy was insufficient and inference needs a period of on-service activity. That is incompatible with keeping children out of a harmful-content service from entry. For services children may use, Ofcom left an evidential route for a wider process, requiring proof of accuracy, timing, protection during the inference interval, reliability and fairness. Email-based estimation from other established service uses is not interchangeable with this behavioural on-platform inference.</p>\n<h2 id=\"currentness-certification-and-enforcement\">Currentness, certification and enforcement</h2>\n<p>The <a>2 September 2026 update</a>.</p>\n<p>A short official [FOI response2053425](http[local research file] dated 26 August 2025 despite its October folder, is particularly useful. PDF 2 Q3 says Ofcom does not certify/approve specific vendors and had no vendor contracts or MOUs. Q4 says Ofcom has no access to data users submit to those vendors; it expressly does not answer for other authorities. These are dated institutional statements, not a current independent audit of data flows or proof that platforms and vendors cannot access data. Q5 rejects a general internet-wide age-check requirement.</p>\n<p>The [July 2026 statutory report](http[local research file] cover 15 July 2026, describes early findings predominantly from the first six months after July 2025 duties, not final causal proof. Paragraphs 5.30–5.35, PDF 42–43, retain the inference concerns; its sampled service evidence does not justify claiming every listed method works in every deployment. The 2 September resource follows these identified implementation shortcomings.</p>\n<p>The [Xgroovy case update](http[local research file] case CW/01318/09/25, distinguishes a 16 June 2026 provisional notice from a 3 September confirmation decision, announced 4 September. Ofcom reports a £700,000 section 12 penalty and a separate £30,000 section 102(8)(a) information-request penalty, plus a conditional daily information penalty. The underlying non-confidential confirmation decision is still promised for later publication. Record these as reported imposed penalties, not money collected or a court judgment. The case identifies the provider by service, not a resolved legal-company name.</p>\n<h2 id=\"boundaries-and-missing-discriminating-records\">Boundaries and missing discriminating records</h2>\n<p>The strongest rival to a vendor-capture reading is disclosed technical consultation within a technology-neutral regime: one commercial method was accepted, while commercial certification and threshold requests were not adopted wholesale. The missing discriminating records are the complete technical evidence submitted for email-based estimation and independent test/evaluation records showing why it met each criterion; any actual procurement/payment or contractual link needs its own evidence. The market lane owns the vendor counterpart route; the advocacy lane owns original 5Rights submissions and should reuse this statement source for disposition.</p>\n<p>Further public acquisition stops at this coherent packet. Reopen the enforcement branch when the non-confidential Xgroovy confirmation decision is published, and the prospective 16+ branch when the actual assessment, legislative instrument and commencement arrangements appear. Nothing here assesses the separate national digital-ID project&#x27;s status; that belongs to root&#x27;s currentness check. Do not turn its cancellation or continuation into a conclusion about OSA age assurance or the separate DVS framework.</p>\n<p>Original bytes retained: enacted Act and current section 12/81 HTML, with hashes. Ordinary Ofcom GETs returned 403; the public web reader was the successful substitute. Ofcom captures are scoped derivative reader outputs with extract hashes only—no original PDF/HTML hash is claimed. Source-level locators and actual read extents are in policy-candidate.json; manifests distinguish error-response hashes from originals. The old /illegal-and-harmful-content/age-assurance path returned 404, while the actual current linked /protecting-children/age-assurance route was read. No paid access, outreach, restricted-route workaround or canonical edits.</p>",
        "path": "uk-age-wave-2026-09-09/policy-findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w7-policy-s-osa-enacted",
          "w7-policy-s-s12-current",
          "w7-policy-s-s81-current",
          "w7-policy-s-statement2025",
          "w7-policy-s-part3",
          "w7-policy-s-part5",
          "w7-policy-s-child-code",
          "w7-policy-s-children-decisions",
          "w7-policy-s-report2026",
          "w7-policy-s-current-page",
          "w7-policy-s-vet-vendor",
          "w7-policy-s-foi2053425",
          "w7-policy-s-xgroovy",
          "w7-policy-s-dates"
        ],
        "markdown": "As observed 9 September 2026, the Online Safety Act duties and Ofcom's implementation require highly effective age assurance (HEAA) for defined services and harmful-content risks. They do not create a universal identification requirement for everyone using the internet. The consequential influence record is unusually explicit: Ofcom credited AVPA and VerifyMy evidence when adding email-based age estimation to its examples of methods capable of HEAA. That is acceptance of a method-level contribution, not approval of the company, procurement, demonstrated deployment performance or evidence of a payment.\n\n## The legal chain\n\nThe Online Safety Act 2023 (see source references) assented to on 26 October 2023, defines a child as under 18 (section 236, PDF 218/printed 204). Section 230 (PDF 212/printed 198) distinguishes verifying exact age from estimating age or age-range; a bare self-declaration is neither. Identity-document matching is one possible method. Facial age estimation is another. The final Part 5 guidance explains that open banking can pass an over-18 result without passing date of birth or other information to the relying service (paragraph 4.12, PDF 17). A token can communicate a completed age check; it is not itself the underlying age-assurance method.\n\n| Decision or duty | Precise scope and timing |\n| --- | --- |\n| OSA section 81, current official text (see source references) | Part 5 provider-published pornography: use verification/estimation so children are not normally able to encounter it; method and deployment must be highly effective. Also record methods/privacy consideration and publish a summary. Official commencement annotation: 17 January 2025, SI 2024/1333 regulation 2(1)(a). |\n| OSA section 12, current official text (see source references) | User-to-user services likely to be accessed by children: proportionate protection duties. Sections 12(4)–(6) require HEAA for identified primary-priority content unless that kind is prohibited for all users by the terms. A prohibition does not remove the broader protection duties. This covers more than pornography: section 61 includes suicide, self-injury and eating-disorder encouragement/instructions. |\n| OSA sections 35–36 | All Part 3 user-to-user and search services assess children's access. The statutory test examines actual use/likely attraction, not just the intended audience. Claiming children cannot access requires verification/estimation that actually excludes them. Initial access-assessment deadline: 16 April 2025. |\n| OSA section 82 and Schedule 4 paragraph 12 | Ofcom must give Part 5 guidance with examples and compliance principles; the children's codes must recommend HEAA for the section 12(3)(a) duty and have regard to that guidance. Statutory guidance obligation is distinct from certification of vendors. |\n| Final Protection of Children Code | Statement/guidance 24 April 2025; issued code cover dated 4 July 2025 and in force 25 July 2025. Initial children's risk-assessment deadline 24 July 2025. See issued user-to-user code (see source references) |\n\nThe section 12 commencement annotation says 10 January 2024. That should not be confused with the operational compliance deadline after the statutory assessment/code process: Ofcom's dated implementation table and enforcement case expressly identify 25 July 2025 for these children's safety duties. The current implementation dates table (see source references) preserves the sequence.\n\nThe code's recommendations are a statutory route to compliance, not every word a freestanding legislative prohibition. OSA section 49(1) treats relevant recommended measures as compliance;49(5)–(6) accommodates alternative measures subject to scrutiny and privacy/expression safeguards. Section 50(1) says failure to follow a code provision does not itself create court/tribunal liability. The underlying duties remain mandatory.\n\nThe issued code, PDF 20–27 (printed 21–28), distinguishes service-wide adult access controls for services principally hosting primary-priority/priority harmful content (PCU B2/B3) from content/feed protections (B4–B7). For B4–B7 it allows appropriate restrictions to remain on users who do not elect to prove adulthood, rather than demanding a document from every user. Each measure has its own content/risk/functionality conditions; B7 excludes bullying from its priority-content trigger. Search services have children's-access and protection duties, but not the same HEAA duty as user-to-user services to prevent access to pornography. Ofcom's July 2026 report paragraph 4.34, PDF 31, makes that distinction expressly.\n\n## What consultation actually changed\n\nThe 16 January 2025 statement (see source references) provides the decision record. Its currently linked attachment carries a 16 May 2025 listing date, while the PDF cover says16 January 2025; no new decision date is inferred from the media listing or URL query.\n\nParagraphs 3.85–3.87, PDF 27: AVPA/VerifyMy evidence supported adding email-based estimation, conditional on effective implementation. Paragraphs 3.103–3.105, PDF 30–31: token references were added, retaining responsibility for the underlying check and sharing process. The preceding response summary, paragraphs 3.66–3.68 and footnote 94 on PDF 24, attributes the token recommendation to 5Rights, Yoti and the ACT App Association. Paragraph 3.108, PDF 31, and 3.350–3.353, PDF 76–77: certification can evidence compliance but is neither compulsory nor automatic; Ofcom did not adopt Yoti's request to mandate independent testing/certification. Paragraphs 3.243–3.259, PDF 54–57: requested numerical thresholds were declined at that stage, citing inadequate comparable evidence/testing and market-development concerns. Paragraphs 3.277–3.290, PDF 62–65: 5Rights' separate privacy-criterion proposal was declined because existing data-protection law applied; design/minimisation guidance was strengthened. None of these outcomes proves a private bargain or sole authorship.\n\nThe April 2025 children's statement Volume 4 (see source references) paragraphs 13.343–13.357, PDF 204–207, separately handles behavioural age inference. It rejected adding inference to the HEAA examples: evidence of efficacy was insufficient and inference needs a period of on-service activity. That is incompatible with keeping children out of a harmful-content service from entry. For services children may use, Ofcom left an evidential route for a wider process, requiring proof of accuracy, timing, protection during the inference interval, reliability and fairness. Email-based estimation from other established service uses is not interchangeable with this behavioural on-platform inference.\n\n## Currentness, certification and enforcement\n\nThe 2 September 2026 update.\n\nA short official FOI response2053425 (see source references) dated 26 August 2025 despite its October folder, is particularly useful. PDF 2 Q3 says Ofcom does not certify/approve specific vendors and had no vendor contracts or MOUs. Q4 says Ofcom has no access to data users submit to those vendors; it expressly does not answer for other authorities. These are dated institutional statements, not a current independent audit of data flows or proof that platforms and vendors cannot access data. Q5 rejects a general internet-wide age-check requirement.\n\nThe July 2026 statutory report (see source references) cover 15 July 2026, describes early findings predominantly from the first six months after July 2025 duties, not final causal proof. Paragraphs 5.30–5.35, PDF 42–43, retain the inference concerns; its sampled service evidence does not justify claiming every listed method works in every deployment. The 2 September resource follows these identified implementation shortcomings.\n\nThe Xgroovy case update (see source references) case CW/01318/09/25, distinguishes a 16 June 2026 provisional notice from a 3 September confirmation decision, announced 4 September. Ofcom reports a £700,000 section 12 penalty and a separate £30,000 section 102(8)(a) information-request penalty, plus a conditional daily information penalty. The underlying non-confidential confirmation decision is still promised for later publication. Record these as reported imposed penalties, not money collected or a court judgment. The case identifies the provider by service, not a resolved legal-company name.\n\n## Boundaries and missing discriminating records\n\nThe strongest rival to a vendor-capture reading is disclosed technical consultation within a technology-neutral regime: one commercial method was accepted, while commercial certification and threshold requests were not adopted wholesale. The missing discriminating records are the complete technical evidence submitted for email-based estimation and independent test/evaluation records showing why it met each criterion; any actual procurement/payment or contractual link needs its own evidence. The market lane owns the vendor counterpart route; the advocacy lane owns original 5Rights submissions and should reuse this statement source for disposition.\n\nFurther public acquisition stops at this coherent packet. Reopen the enforcement branch when the non-confidential Xgroovy confirmation decision is published, and the prospective 16+ branch when the actual assessment, legislative instrument and commencement arrangements appear. Nothing here assesses the separate national digital-ID project's status; that belongs to root's currentness check. Do not turn its cancellation or continuation into a conclusion about OSA age assurance or the separate DVS framework.\n\nOriginal bytes retained: enacted Act and current section 12/81 HTML, with hashes. Ordinary Ofcom GETs returned 403; the public web reader was the successful substitute. Ofcom captures are scoped derivative reader outputs with extract hashes only—no original PDF/HTML hash is claimed. Source-level locators and actual read extents are in policy-candidate.json; manifests distinguish error-response hashes from originals. The old /illegal-and-harmful-content/age-assurance path returned 404, while the actual current linked /protecting-children/age-assurance route was read. No paid access, outreach, restricted-route workaround or canonical edits.\n",
        "file": "research/uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: participant confirmation and provider decision rights",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. Two PayPal policy originals were retained; Mastercard's complete public policy was read through the successful official reader after its ordinary GET failed. No report form, account, live list or payment operation was used. This is a scoped comparison of public rules, not confirmation of a signed WIPO-provider ag",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. Two PayPal policy originals were retained; Mastercard&#x27;s complete public policy was read through the successful official reader after its ordinary GET failed. No report form, account, live list or payment operation was used. This is a scoped comparison of public rules, not confirmation of a signed WIPO-provider agreement.</p>\n<p>The acquired provider policies show that a notification can enter a provider-controlled investigation and contract process. They do not establish exactly how ALERT-PAY notifications are classified within that process. In particular, Mastercard&#x27;s public rules distinguish stopping payments for an infringing product from terminating the merchant and from wider notice through MATCH. Neither an alert nor an infringing-product finding proves that all three occurred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-confirmed-about-programme-identity\">What is confirmed about programme identity</h2>\n<p>Root retained the official [WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation](http[local research file] whose [document index](http[local research file] records publication on 16 June 2026. This worker read original slides 4–7. Slide 4 names Mastercard and PayPal among payment service providers in the described development and says PSPs choose what action, if any, to take under their policies. Slide 5 describes WIPO checking formalities, administering notifications/review and aggregating lists. Slide 7 reports an anonymous six-rightsholder/two-PSP pilot; those numbers alone do not identify the two pilot firms.</p>\n<p>The finite participant-owned searches did not locate a PayPal or Mastercard ALERT-PAY announcement, signed participation terms, programme-specific challenge rule or correction agreement. That is a public-source gap, not evidence that either company did not participate. WIPO fee-payment pages, Mastercard&#x27;s own website-content copyright terms, and unrelated industry initiatives were excluded. No identity was inferred from adjacent programmes, logos or illustrative application screens.</p>\n<p>Root&#x27;s separate indexed-transcript review qualifies slide 6&#x27;s test-purchase box: according to that reading, a purchase depends on the PSP and none was needed during the pilot. This worker&#x27;s pinpoint attempt to reopen that transcript returned a zero-line page, so this is not an independently reread transcript claim here. Do not treat slide 6 as proof of a universal purchase requirement or a contradiction with the provider policy below. Root owns the reconciled programme chronology and transcript scope.</p>\n<h2 id=\"mastercard-investigation-product-level-action-and-conditional-wider-notice\">Mastercard: investigation, product-level action, and conditional wider notice</h2>\n<p>[Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy](http[local research file] undated US public page observed 9 September 2026, numbered sections 1–4, allocates these roles:</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Stage</th>\n<th>Public policy allocation</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Intake</td>\n<td>Law-enforcement evidence, or a rightsholder/authorized trade-association referral supported by specified evidence and attestations</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Investigation</td>\n<td>Mastercard identifies the acquiring relationship and requires the acquirer to investigate/report: two business days for the law-enforcement route, five for the private-referral route; extensions are discretionary</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Finding</td>\n<td>An affirmative finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; a negative finding requires compelling evidence</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Termination</td>\n<td>If the acquirer terminates the merchant, Mastercard requires MATCH listing where applicable, notifying acquirers of termination and its reason code</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Enforcement</td>\n<td>Mastercard retains interpretation/enforcement authority and may restrict or sanction a noncompliant acquirer&#x27;s membership</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Private referrals require ownership evidence, specific alleged products/locations, notice materials and payment-method evidence; a test transaction is optional. Submitters consent to disclosure and cooperation and may face indemnity requirements. The private-referral route includes reporting investigation results back to the rightsholder/association. Section 3 also addresses restricting cross-border acquiring where the product&#x27;s legality differs by country.</p>\n<p>This is the provider&#x27;s general policy, not an acquired ALERT-PAY addendum. WIPO&#x27;s institutional status does not establish that its alert enters the law-enforcement route. Do not add Mastercard&#x27;s two/five-business-day clocks to WIPO&#x27;s notification clocks. A merits response, merchant termination and MATCH entry remain distinct. No MATCH deletion/restoration rule or completed appeal was acquired in this lane; that does not establish that none exists elsewhere.</p>\n<p>The policy&#x27;s opening BRAM context also reserves discretion over transactions considered damaging to Mastercard&#x27;s goodwill. That broader context should not be silently turned into an ALERT-PAY eligibility criterion. The inspected programme concerns counterfeit goods and subscription piracy; the underlying provider contract may have other grounds, whose application requires separate evidence.</p>\n<h2 id=\"paypal-a-short-reporting-policy-with-distinct-locale-dates\">PayPal: a short reporting policy, with distinct locale dates</h2>\n<p>The [UK Infringement Report Policy](http[local research file] is labelled <strong>15 July 2026</strong>; the [US page](http[local research file] is labelled <strong>6 May 2021</strong>. Both retained originals give the same operative policy paragraph: PayPal may take appropriate action where necessary concerning claimed infringement and invites IP rights owners to submit its report. The UK page separately identifies PayPal UK Ltd, company 14741686. That locale disclosure does not identify the legal PSP party to WIPO&#x27;s pilot or contract.</p>\n<p>These short pages do not state a fixed action deadline, evidential adjudication procedure, counter-notice timetable, automatic account termination or ALERT-PAY-specific correction rule. The blank report and broader account contracts were not opened. Absence from this paragraph is not absence of wider PayPal remedies. The different update dates cannot be treated as dates when ALERT-PAY was adopted or when the operative paragraph changed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"evidence-strength-useful-relations-and-the-next-discriminator\">Evidence strength, useful relations and the next discriminator</h2>\n<p>The strongest supported interpretation is a notification channel feeding institutions that retain their own decision rights, with Mastercard&#x27;s acquirer relationship adding another decision step. The strongest rival to a simple automatic cutoff model is an investigation that rejects the allegation, targets only the disputed product, or requires another response without terminating the merchant. The public rules permit that distinction; they do not reveal actual frequencies or outcomes. Conversely, retaining discretion and a negative-finding route does not prove that challenges succeed or that corrections propagate reliably.</p>\n<p>Candidate relations for later review: WIPO to named PSPs, programme description only; rightsholder/authorized association to Mastercard, general referral right; Mastercard to acquirer, investigation/reporting and policy-enforcement duties; acquirer to infringing-product acceptance, conditional cessation; terminated merchant to MATCH, conditional subsequent notice; PayPal to IP rights owner, public reporting invitation. There is no acquired agreement edge binding either provider to act on every WIPO entry and no exercised payment-cutoff edge from these policies.</p>\n<p>The next revealing record is the actual participation agreement or a public provider explanation tying an ALERT-PAY notification to a particular internal route, together with a redacted completed case showing review, reasoned outcome, correction and any merchant/MATCH restoration. Likely holders are WIPO&#x27;s Building Respect for IP Division and the relevant PSP, with an acquirer involved for Mastercard. This names a record family and accountable actors, not a claim that a particular unpublished document exists. No broader bank, cryptocurrency or donor branch was opened.</p>\n<h2 id=\"custody-and-reading-scope\">Custody and reading scope</h2>\n<p><code>participant-captures.json</code> records URLs, dates, source states, queries, originals, reader ancestry and the failed transcript pinpoint. The complete provider-reader output is retained in <code>participant-policies.reader.txt</code>. Mastercard original GET returned 403; its error hash is not policy custody, and neither that route nor a PDF variant was retried.</p>\n<p>PayPal UK original SHA256: <code>9e0f6c2c882c7a8b3ec12d2bb65c0740297b97a01f06fb45bb1c3b15d309ba97</code>. PayPal US original SHA256: <code>ff31dfe0fe37189bb4321f48c0688eb5c9ce47239537dfd5d8c6560bf3305edd</code>. Both complete short substantive policies were read from original HTML and through the primary reader; status/footer context was kept separate. No form or image was inspected.</p>\n<p>Mastercard scope: entire substantive introductory policy and sections 1–4, reader lines 156–184, including both routes and the failure-to-comply section. Its linked forms, issuer process and general Rules/MATCH manuals were not read. WIPO scope: root&#x27;s original slides 4–7 only, SHA256 <code>e4afb3bdce8e4d4266a5d992abe117b95b38cf57ff27979ccf6d70af4b7e11a4</code>, with a separate local extract; the presentation was not redownloaded. Root&#x27;s programme packet supplies its fuller primary reading.</p>\n<p>Acquisition closed for independent review and the combined forest. No case, atlas, current-work, forest, ZIP or visible UI changed.</p>",
        "path": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09/participant-authority.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-mc-antipiracy",
          "w30-class-s-paypal-uk",
          "w30-class-s-paypal-us"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Bounded acquisition closed. Two PayPal policy originals were retained; Mastercard's complete public policy was read through the successful official reader after its ordinary GET failed. No report form, account, live list or payment operation was used. This is a scoped comparison of public rules, not confirmation of a signed WIPO-provider agreement.\n\nThe acquired provider policies show that a notification can enter a provider-controlled investigation and contract process. They do not establish exactly how ALERT-PAY notifications are classified within that process. In particular, Mastercard's public rules distinguish stopping payments for an infringing product from terminating the merchant and from wider notice through MATCH. Neither an alert nor an infringing-product finding proves that all three occurred.\n\n## What is confirmed about programme identity\n\nRoot retained the official WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation (see source references) whose document index (see source references) records publication on 16 June 2026. This worker read original slides 4–7. Slide 4 names Mastercard and PayPal among payment service providers in the described development and says PSPs choose what action, if any, to take under their policies. Slide 5 describes WIPO checking formalities, administering notifications/review and aggregating lists. Slide 7 reports an anonymous six-rightsholder/two-PSP pilot; those numbers alone do not identify the two pilot firms.\n\nThe finite participant-owned searches did not locate a PayPal or Mastercard ALERT-PAY announcement, signed participation terms, programme-specific challenge rule or correction agreement. That is a public-source gap, not evidence that either company did not participate. WIPO fee-payment pages, Mastercard's own website-content copyright terms, and unrelated industry initiatives were excluded. No identity was inferred from adjacent programmes, logos or illustrative application screens.\n\nRoot's separate indexed-transcript review qualifies slide 6's test-purchase box: according to that reading, a purchase depends on the PSP and none was needed during the pilot. This worker's pinpoint attempt to reopen that transcript returned a zero-line page, so this is not an independently reread transcript claim here. Do not treat slide 6 as proof of a universal purchase requirement or a contradiction with the provider policy below. Root owns the reconciled programme chronology and transcript scope.\n\n## Mastercard: investigation, product-level action, and conditional wider notice\n\nMastercard Anti-Piracy Policy (see source references) undated US public page observed 9 September 2026, numbered sections 1–4, allocates these roles:\n\n| Stage | Public policy allocation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Intake | Law-enforcement evidence, or a rightsholder/authorized trade-association referral supported by specified evidence and attestations |\n| Investigation | Mastercard identifies the acquiring relationship and requires the acquirer to investigate/report: two business days for the law-enforcement route, five for the private-referral route; extensions are discretionary |\n| Finding | An affirmative finding requires ending Mastercard acceptance for the infringing product; a negative finding requires compelling evidence |\n| Termination | If the acquirer terminates the merchant, Mastercard requires MATCH listing where applicable, notifying acquirers of termination and its reason code |\n| Enforcement | Mastercard retains interpretation/enforcement authority and may restrict or sanction a noncompliant acquirer's membership |\n\nPrivate referrals require ownership evidence, specific alleged products/locations, notice materials and payment-method evidence; a test transaction is optional. Submitters consent to disclosure and cooperation and may face indemnity requirements. The private-referral route includes reporting investigation results back to the rightsholder/association. Section 3 also addresses restricting cross-border acquiring where the product's legality differs by country.\n\nThis is the provider's general policy, not an acquired ALERT-PAY addendum. WIPO's institutional status does not establish that its alert enters the law-enforcement route. Do not add Mastercard's two/five-business-day clocks to WIPO's notification clocks. A merits response, merchant termination and MATCH entry remain distinct. No MATCH deletion/restoration rule or completed appeal was acquired in this lane; that does not establish that none exists elsewhere.\n\nThe policy's opening BRAM context also reserves discretion over transactions considered damaging to Mastercard's goodwill. That broader context should not be silently turned into an ALERT-PAY eligibility criterion. The inspected programme concerns counterfeit goods and subscription piracy; the underlying provider contract may have other grounds, whose application requires separate evidence.\n\n## PayPal: a short reporting policy, with distinct locale dates\n\nThe UK Infringement Report Policy (see source references) is labelled **15 July 2026**; the US page (see source references) is labelled **6 May 2021**. Both retained originals give the same operative policy paragraph: PayPal may take appropriate action where necessary concerning claimed infringement and invites IP rights owners to submit its report. The UK page separately identifies PayPal UK Ltd, company 14741686. That locale disclosure does not identify the legal PSP party to WIPO's pilot or contract.\n\nThese short pages do not state a fixed action deadline, evidential adjudication procedure, counter-notice timetable, automatic account termination or ALERT-PAY-specific correction rule. The blank report and broader account contracts were not opened. Absence from this paragraph is not absence of wider PayPal remedies. The different update dates cannot be treated as dates when ALERT-PAY was adopted or when the operative paragraph changed.\n\n## Evidence strength, useful relations and the next discriminator\n\nThe strongest supported interpretation is a notification channel feeding institutions that retain their own decision rights, with Mastercard's acquirer relationship adding another decision step. The strongest rival to a simple automatic cutoff model is an investigation that rejects the allegation, targets only the disputed product, or requires another response without terminating the merchant. The public rules permit that distinction; they do not reveal actual frequencies or outcomes. Conversely, retaining discretion and a negative-finding route does not prove that challenges succeed or that corrections propagate reliably.\n\nCandidate relations for later review: WIPO to named PSPs, programme description only; rightsholder/authorized association to Mastercard, general referral right; Mastercard to acquirer, investigation/reporting and policy-enforcement duties; acquirer to infringing-product acceptance, conditional cessation; terminated merchant to MATCH, conditional subsequent notice; PayPal to IP rights owner, public reporting invitation. There is no acquired agreement edge binding either provider to act on every WIPO entry and no exercised payment-cutoff edge from these policies.\n\nThe next revealing record is the actual participation agreement or a public provider explanation tying an ALERT-PAY notification to a particular internal route, together with a redacted completed case showing review, reasoned outcome, correction and any merchant/MATCH restoration. Likely holders are WIPO's Building Respect for IP Division and the relevant PSP, with an acquirer involved for Mastercard. This names a record family and accountable actors, not a claim that a particular unpublished document exists. No broader bank, cryptocurrency or donor branch was opened.\n\n## Custody and reading scope\n\n`participant-captures.json` records URLs, dates, source states, queries, originals, reader ancestry and the failed transcript pinpoint. The complete provider-reader output is retained in `participant-policies.reader.txt`. Mastercard original GET returned 403; its error hash is not policy custody, and neither that route nor a PDF variant was retried.\n\nPayPal UK original SHA256: `9e0f6c2c882c7a8b3ec12d2bb65c0740297b97a01f06fb45bb1c3b15d309ba97`. PayPal US original SHA256: `ff31dfe0fe37189bb4321f48c0688eb5c9ce47239537dfd5d8c6560bf3305edd`. Both complete short substantive policies were read from original HTML and through the primary reader; status/footer context was kept separate. No form or image was inspected.\n\nMastercard scope: entire substantive introductory policy and sections 1–4, reader lines 156–184, including both routes and the failure-to-comply section. Its linked forms, issuer process and general Rules/MATCH manuals were not read. WIPO scope: root's original slides 4–7 only, SHA256 `e4afb3bdce8e4d4266a5d992abe117b95b38cf57ff27979ccf6d70af4b7e11a4`, with a separate local extract; the presentation was not redownloaded. Root's programme packet supplies its fuller primary reading.\n\nAcquisition closed for independent review and the combined forest. No case, atlas, current-work, forest, ZIP or visible UI changed.\n",
        "file": "research/wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-participant-authority.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: the programme, the described process, and what its pilot measures",
        "description": "9 September 2026. Root core lane closed for independent review. This is a separate payment-information programme, not WIPO Pay for office fees, WIPO ALERT advertising, or Brazil's domestic distribution to payment intermediaries. Source descriptions and reported outcomes are kept at their dates. No account, list, payment operation or video playback was perfor",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026. Root core lane closed for independent review. This is a separate payment-information programme, not WIPO Pay for office fees, WIPO ALERT advertising, or Brazil&#x27;s domestic distribution to payment intermediaries. Source descriptions and reported outcomes are kept at their dates. No account, list, payment operation or video playback was performed. Original speech has not been watched or authenticated against the automatic transcript.</p>\n<h2 id=\"primary-records-and-scope\">Primary records and scope</h2>\n<p>The retained official presentation is WIPO/ACE/18/40/PRESENTATION, linked by the official document page published16June2026. The deck identifies the ACE eighteenth session,2–4June2026. Its direct original is http[local research file] ; retained core-presentation.pdf SHA256 e4afb3bdce8e4d4266a5d992abe117b95b38cf57ff27979ccf6d70af4b7e11a4. All18pages of extractable text read. Root actually visually inspected full slides6 and9–17, rendered locally with Poppler from these exact bytes. PDF screenshots from the web tool were unusable (one empty result/three Cachemiss errors); local rendering was the successful substitute. Slides4,5,7,8 are text-read, not falsely labelled image-inspected. Interface images are illustrative material in a development presentation, not live system observation.</p>\n<p>The official Secretariat activities report is WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV., dated28May2026 and covering January2025–April2026. Original http[local research file] ; retained core-activities2026.pdf SHA25641e5b746daa77847b90733af50c8f4c9c4d7ff0f48083ef16544f6cdf204e4bc. Root read title/introductory scope in the official reader and all originalPDFpage8, especially§13; the full13pages are retained/extracted but not all substantively read. Other programme counts, budgets and collaboration rosters are not adopted as ALERT-PAY facts.</p>\n<p>The4June2026afternoon WIPO webcast page supplies an indexed automatic transcript: http[local research file] . Root substantively read the ToddReeves update, development/interface explanation and subsequent Brazil/Secretariat exchange through web search reader turn1478search0. Root&#x27;s direct200HTML is only the app shell and contains no transcript. The indexed text explicitly warns that it is generated automatically and only original speech is the official proceedings record. core-transcript-scope.md is root paraphrase and locators, NOT verbatim transcript or an audiovisual original. There is no claim of complete-session reading, transcription fidelity, or original speech inspection.</p>\n<h2 id=\"identity-chronology-and-decision-rights\">Identity, chronology and decision rights</h2>\n<p>Activities§13 reports BRIP finished a manual pilot in2025 with a small rights-holder group and two major payment providers, then began online-platform development in2026. Deck7 supplies the more exact window November2024–August2025, six rights holders, two PSPs,17actions and35sites. The broader statement &#x27;pilot conducted in2025&#x27; on deck4 is consistent with this spanning window; it must not erase the2024start.</p>\n<p>Deck4 names Mastercard and PayPal, alongside other PSPs as the intended/global cooperation class. Deck7 does not individually identify the two pilot PSPs or six rights holders. The automatic transcript says the interface currently under development offers PayPal and Mastercard. None of these independently names the two historical pilot providers. Illustrative Adidas-labelled screens likewise do not prove Adidas joined the pilot or signed a programme contract.</p>\n<p>The target described by§13 and deck3–4 is websites predominantly offering/selling counterfeit goods or subscription services offering pirated content. This is a programme scope claim, not a validated finding about any particular site, a consumer-identification duty, or a universal restriction on lawful purchasing. WIPO receives right-holder claims and checks completeness/required attestations. Deck5 assigns WIPO hosting, notices and requests for review, aggregation and access for PSPs. Deck4/§13 leave whether to act and whether merchant-account termination is warranted to each PSP under its existing policies. No WIPO adjudication order or instruction to terminate every listed merchant is established.</p>\n<p>The scheme reduces the coordination work needed for allegations to reach payment providers. That infrastructure/resource mechanism is supported by the described roles; an inference that WIPO thereby controls every provider decision is not. The general Mastercard/PayPal policies investigated in a parallel lane must not be silently treated as incorporated ALERT-PAY terms.</p>\n<h2 id=\"the-notice-chain-and-its-unresolved-branch\">The notice chain and its unresolved branch</h2>\n<p>Visually inspected deck6 describes an authorized right holder identifying a site, simulating a purchase and sending a first merchant/alternative-contact notice. After3workingdays the right holder applies to WIPO. WIPO checks completeness and sends a second notice; after another3workingdays it includes the site for PSP assessment. These are successive design stages, not a proved six-day maximum or an observed case timeline. There is no specified deadline for WIPO&#x27;s completeness work in this diagram.</p>\n<p>The automatic transcript materially qualifies the abbreviated diagram: it says inclusion follows the second3workingdays without a response. It describes actual or simulated purchases as depending on the PSP&#x27;s requirements, and says actual test transactions were not conducted during the pilot because providers said they were unnecessary. Preserve this as the presenter&#x27;s automatically transcribed account, not an independently inspected transaction record. The demonstration&#x27;s transaction checkbox and optional-looking financial fields are consistent with variable collection, but do not prove backend validation rules.</p>\n<p>Deck4 promises notice/review to protect operators; deck5 makes WIPO the administrator of review requests; deck16 shows a review-requested state. The presentation does not disclose who resolves a contested infringement on its merits, evidential burden, representation/translation provisions, proof of delivery, listing status while review is pending, review deadlines, liability allocation, or binding recipient correction/restoration rules. Those are specific unacquired instruments, not evidence that no safeguards exist. No imported advertising-only limitation or Brazil60dayreview clock applies automatically.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-application-images-actually-show\">What the application images actually show</h2>\n<p>Slides9–14 display steps for URL/provider selection; existing or newly registered IP rights with jurisdiction, registration and certificate image; descriptions/evidence of goods; seller and registrar contact routes; transaction/checkout evidence; and a recorded right-holder notice with copy upload. Slide13&#x27;s financial-account field requests redacted/encrypted information. It establishes a displayed data-handling instruction, not verified encryption or retention practice. The seven-step header includes a declaration stage, but its actual attestation text is not shown in these inspected screens.</p>\n<p>Slides15–17 show formalities status/timeline, review/waiting/ready states, PSP feedback, pending feedback and recipient outcome categories. Illustrative fake/test domains and sample identities/dates must not become actual incidents, contributors or account actions on the map. In particular, same-day dates in an illustrative screen do not prove that actual cases bypassed the staged waiting periods. No listed demonstration domain was opened. No underlying platform, deployed revision, access rules or runtime behavior was inspected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"pilot-outcomes-removal-is-a-composite-endpoint\">Pilot outcomes: removal is a composite endpoint</h2>\n<p>Deck8 reports71percent removed, defined beneath the headline as flagged sites offline OR goods removed. Deck7&#x27;s17actions/35sites is not a count of17merchant terminations. The automatic transcript similarly describes flagged sites or infringing listings removed, and reports some false branding: provider logos did not always correspond to an actual payment service. Thus an apparent logo does not establish a payment relationship or a route that can be cut off.</p>\n<p>Neither acquired source supplies the numerator/rounding method, per-site dates, denominator consistency, classification accuracy, permanent removal, individual PSP decisions, the number of merchant accounts terminated, revenue prevented, a counterfactual, or an independently audited outcome. The public aggregate cannot isolate voluntary operator response to notices from registrar action or PSP enforcement. The presenter&#x27;s report that participants considered the pilot useful is participant feedback, not an evaluation independent of the programme. The deck&#x27;s prediction that broad adoption could be disruptive is a projection, not measured global reach.</p>\n<h2 id=\"development-and-the-publication-gap\">Development and the publication gap</h2>\n<p>Deck8 says the system is under development at the June presentation. The automatic transcript attributes interface construction to an on-staff software engineer working for the preceding2–3months and says completion/availability is hoped for soon. This supplies an attributed staffing/resource input, not a name, employer contract, budget or completed launch. The parallel resources lane seeks later dated status and specific funding evidence.</p>\n<p>The indexed automatic transcript records Brazil objecting that document18/40 was unavailable before the discussion, limiting preparation, and a Secretariat apology/promise to publish the presentation. The official16June publication metadata confirms later public posting of this document; it does not prove deliberate suppression, privately shared alternative terms, or the exact reason/timing for the delay. Brazil&#x27;s broader AI/enforcement criticism is a separate intervention and is not adopted as a factual finding about ALERT-PAY.</p>\n<h2 id=\"discriminating-next-records-within-the-run\">Discriminating next records within the run</h2>\n<p>Highest-value gaps are the versioned right-holder/PSP participation instruments, authorized-contributor eligibility and attestations, contested-case review rules, pilot case-level action/outcome table, exact participant roster and any later public go-live/acceptance record. A redacted worked notice, response, decision and recipient correction would distinguish notice-induced compliance from account exclusion and show who can reverse which stage. No claim of a PIPCU input, Steam intervention, bank-owner instruction, stablecoin infrastructure or shared command centre follows from this packet.</p>",
        "path": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09/programme-process.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-pay-deck",
          "w30-class-s-pay-activities"
        ],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026. Root core lane closed for independent review. This is a separate payment-information programme, not WIPO Pay for office fees, WIPO ALERT advertising, or Brazil's domestic distribution to payment intermediaries. Source descriptions and reported outcomes are kept at their dates. No account, list, payment operation or video playback was performed. Original speech has not been watched or authenticated against the automatic transcript.\n\n## Primary records and scope\n\nThe retained official presentation is WIPO/ACE/18/40/PRESENTATION, linked by the official document page published16June2026. The deck identifies the ACE eighteenth session,2–4June2026. Its direct original is http[local research file] ; retained core-presentation.pdf SHA256 e4afb3bdce8e4d4266a5d992abe117b95b38cf57ff27979ccf6d70af4b7e11a4. All18pages of extractable text read. Root actually visually inspected full slides6 and9–17, rendered locally with Poppler from these exact bytes. PDF screenshots from the web tool were unusable (one empty result/three Cachemiss errors); local rendering was the successful substitute. Slides4,5,7,8 are text-read, not falsely labelled image-inspected. Interface images are illustrative material in a development presentation, not live system observation.\n\nThe official Secretariat activities report is WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV., dated28May2026 and covering January2025–April2026. Original http[local research file] ; retained core-activities2026.pdf SHA25641e5b746daa77847b90733af50c8f4c9c4d7ff0f48083ef16544f6cdf204e4bc. Root read title/introductory scope in the official reader and all originalPDFpage8, especially§13; the full13pages are retained/extracted but not all substantively read. Other programme counts, budgets and collaboration rosters are not adopted as ALERT-PAY facts.\n\nThe4June2026afternoon WIPO webcast page supplies an indexed automatic transcript: http[local research file] . Root substantively read the ToddReeves update, development/interface explanation and subsequent Brazil/Secretariat exchange through web search reader turn1478search0. Root's direct200HTML is only the app shell and contains no transcript. The indexed text explicitly warns that it is generated automatically and only original speech is the official proceedings record. core-transcript-scope.md is root paraphrase and locators, NOT verbatim transcript or an audiovisual original. There is no claim of complete-session reading, transcription fidelity, or original speech inspection.\n\n## Identity, chronology and decision rights\n\nActivities§13 reports BRIP finished a manual pilot in2025 with a small rights-holder group and two major payment providers, then began online-platform development in2026. Deck7 supplies the more exact window November2024–August2025, six rights holders, two PSPs,17actions and35sites. The broader statement 'pilot conducted in2025' on deck4 is consistent with this spanning window; it must not erase the2024start.\n\nDeck4 names Mastercard and PayPal, alongside other PSPs as the intended/global cooperation class. Deck7 does not individually identify the two pilot PSPs or six rights holders. The automatic transcript says the interface currently under development offers PayPal and Mastercard. None of these independently names the two historical pilot providers. Illustrative Adidas-labelled screens likewise do not prove Adidas joined the pilot or signed a programme contract.\n\nThe target described by§13 and deck3–4 is websites predominantly offering/selling counterfeit goods or subscription services offering pirated content. This is a programme scope claim, not a validated finding about any particular site, a consumer-identification duty, or a universal restriction on lawful purchasing. WIPO receives right-holder claims and checks completeness/required attestations. Deck5 assigns WIPO hosting, notices and requests for review, aggregation and access for PSPs. Deck4/§13 leave whether to act and whether merchant-account termination is warranted to each PSP under its existing policies. No WIPO adjudication order or instruction to terminate every listed merchant is established.\n\nThe scheme reduces the coordination work needed for allegations to reach payment providers. That infrastructure/resource mechanism is supported by the described roles; an inference that WIPO thereby controls every provider decision is not. The general Mastercard/PayPal policies investigated in a parallel lane must not be silently treated as incorporated ALERT-PAY terms.\n\n## The notice chain and its unresolved branch\n\nVisually inspected deck6 describes an authorized right holder identifying a site, simulating a purchase and sending a first merchant/alternative-contact notice. After3workingdays the right holder applies to WIPO. WIPO checks completeness and sends a second notice; after another3workingdays it includes the site for PSP assessment. These are successive design stages, not a proved six-day maximum or an observed case timeline. There is no specified deadline for WIPO's completeness work in this diagram.\n\nThe automatic transcript materially qualifies the abbreviated diagram: it says inclusion follows the second3workingdays without a response. It describes actual or simulated purchases as depending on the PSP's requirements, and says actual test transactions were not conducted during the pilot because providers said they were unnecessary. Preserve this as the presenter's automatically transcribed account, not an independently inspected transaction record. The demonstration's transaction checkbox and optional-looking financial fields are consistent with variable collection, but do not prove backend validation rules.\n\nDeck4 promises notice/review to protect operators; deck5 makes WIPO the administrator of review requests; deck16 shows a review-requested state. The presentation does not disclose who resolves a contested infringement on its merits, evidential burden, representation/translation provisions, proof of delivery, listing status while review is pending, review deadlines, liability allocation, or binding recipient correction/restoration rules. Those are specific unacquired instruments, not evidence that no safeguards exist. No imported advertising-only limitation or Brazil60dayreview clock applies automatically.\n\n## What the application images actually show\n\nSlides9–14 display steps for URL/provider selection; existing or newly registered IP rights with jurisdiction, registration and certificate image; descriptions/evidence of goods; seller and registrar contact routes; transaction/checkout evidence; and a recorded right-holder notice with copy upload. Slide13's financial-account field requests redacted/encrypted information. It establishes a displayed data-handling instruction, not verified encryption or retention practice. The seven-step header includes a declaration stage, but its actual attestation text is not shown in these inspected screens.\n\nSlides15–17 show formalities status/timeline, review/waiting/ready states, PSP feedback, pending feedback and recipient outcome categories. Illustrative fake/test domains and sample identities/dates must not become actual incidents, contributors or account actions on the map. In particular, same-day dates in an illustrative screen do not prove that actual cases bypassed the staged waiting periods. No listed demonstration domain was opened. No underlying platform, deployed revision, access rules or runtime behavior was inspected.\n\n## Pilot outcomes: removal is a composite endpoint\n\nDeck8 reports71percent removed, defined beneath the headline as flagged sites offline OR goods removed. Deck7's17actions/35sites is not a count of17merchant terminations. The automatic transcript similarly describes flagged sites or infringing listings removed, and reports some false branding: provider logos did not always correspond to an actual payment service. Thus an apparent logo does not establish a payment relationship or a route that can be cut off.\n\nNeither acquired source supplies the numerator/rounding method, per-site dates, denominator consistency, classification accuracy, permanent removal, individual PSP decisions, the number of merchant accounts terminated, revenue prevented, a counterfactual, or an independently audited outcome. The public aggregate cannot isolate voluntary operator response to notices from registrar action or PSP enforcement. The presenter's report that participants considered the pilot useful is participant feedback, not an evaluation independent of the programme. The deck's prediction that broad adoption could be disruptive is a projection, not measured global reach.\n\n## Development and the publication gap\n\nDeck8 says the system is under development at the June presentation. The automatic transcript attributes interface construction to an on-staff software engineer working for the preceding2–3months and says completion/availability is hoped for soon. This supplies an attributed staffing/resource input, not a name, employer contract, budget or completed launch. The parallel resources lane seeks later dated status and specific funding evidence.\n\nThe indexed automatic transcript records Brazil objecting that document18/40 was unavailable before the discussion, limiting preparation, and a Secretariat apology/promise to publish the presentation. The official16June publication metadata confirms later public posting of this document; it does not prove deliberate suppression, privately shared alternative terms, or the exact reason/timing for the delay. Brazil's broader AI/enforcement criticism is a separate intervention and is not adopted as a factual finding about ALERT-PAY.\n\n## Discriminating next records within the run\n\nHighest-value gaps are the versioned right-holder/PSP participation instruments, authorized-contributor eligibility and attestations, contested-case review rules, pilot case-level action/outcome table, exact participant roster and any later public go-live/acceptance record. A redacted worked notice, response, decision and recipient correction would distinguish notice-induced compliance from account exclusion and show who can reverse which stage. No claim of a PIPCU input, Steam intervention, bank-owner instruction, stablecoin infrastructure or shared command centre follows from this packet.\n",
        "file": "research/wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-programme-process.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery",
        "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY: resources and delivery boundary",
        "description": "Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. This lane read public WIPO planning, reporting and announcement records. It did not operate the system, inspect flagged sites, identify customers, or contact anyone. The core presentation, activity report and indexed webcast are owned by the root lane and were not rehere.",
        "html": "<p>Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. This lane read public WIPO planning, reporting and announcement records. It did not operate the system, inspect flagged sites, identify customers, or contact anyone. The core presentation, activity report and indexed webcast are owned by the root lane and were not reacquired here.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-the-resource-record-establishes\">What the resource record establishes</h2>\n<p>ALERT-PAY is a named deliverable in WIPO&#x27;s approved work programme, rather than only an informal proposal. The current official budget page says Member States approved the 2026/27 programme in July 2025 and describes the Director General&#x27;s submission and annual performance-reporting route. The same page links the exact budget PDF retained here. About 96% of WIPO&#x27;s projected income comes from its IP-system service fees; this is organization-wide financing, not an ALERT-PAY earmark. [Official budget and accountability page](http[local research file] substantive body from its opening July-approval paragraph through Reporting and monitoring; original <code>resources-budget-approval.html</code>.</p>\n<p>The programme&#x27;s Global Challenges and Partnerships section places ALERT-PAY deployment among Building Respect for IP priorities for 2026/27. The budget allocates CHF2.858 million to the broader Expected Result 2.3 (international dialogue/cooperation on Building Respect for IP) and CHF31.319 million to the whole sector. Neither is a disclosed ALERT-PAY allocation. Its ER2.3 performance indicator concerns implementation of the ACE agenda, not a numerical payment-account closure target. The adjacent trust-fund estimates are also not an attribution of funding to this product; the annex expressly qualifies estimated contributions. [Approved programme](http[local research file] PDF54-55 / printed53-54 (priority), PDF57-59 / printed56-58 (indicator/resources), PDF114 / printed113 (estimate qualification). Source-derived text scope, not an expenditure audit.</p>\n<p>The current linked 2024/25 Performance Report supplies an actual expenditure state at a broader level: CHF3.207 million for ER2.3 and CHF26.887 million for the GCP sector. Its expenditure note defines figures as pre-IPSAS actual expenditure. These are not Pay project costs or bank transfers. The ER2.3 narrative and dashboard document policy dialogue, studies, awareness and training, but do not separately certify the Pay pilot, its payment-provider actions or software acceptance. [Performance Report 2024/25](http[local research file] PDF10-11 / printed9-10; PDF25 / printed24; PDF28 / printed27 ER2.3 row; PDF70 / printed69. Its publication date was not independently established; the title identifies the reporting period. This is a WIPO self-report to Member States, not outside validation of particular outcomes.</p>\n<h2 id=\"what-later-announcements-do-and-do-not-establish\">What later announcements do and do not establish</h2>\n<p>The July 2024 Director General report already announced the forthcoming Pay module. Its adjacent count of more than 8,000 live sites describes advertising ALERT, not Pay. This is historical programme intention. [Director General report, Assemblies July 9-17, 2024](http[local research file] heading and the Building Respect for IP/ALERT paragraph only; the whole speech was not substantively reviewed.</p>\n<p>The later official ACE recap was published 5 August 2026 and explicitly describes the June 2-4 meeting. It says the Secretariat shared an update on the Pay initiative. It supplies neither an online launch date nor new post-pilot outcome figures. Do not recast the recap&#x27;s publication date as a deployment event. [ACE/18 recap](http[local research file] full substantive article and publication date read from retained original, <code>resources-ace-aug2026.html</code>.</p>\n<p>The root lane&#x27;s retained June2026 presentation/activity documents are the relevant evidence for the manual pilot and development phase. This lane does not independently corroborate payment suspensions, the identities of the two pilot providers, or the causal mechanism behind the reported removal percentage. No later launch or independently measured outcome was located in the finite search below. That is a search boundary, not a conclusion that launch never occurred.</p>\n<h2 id=\"explanatory-significance-and-competing-interpretation\">Explanatory significance and competing interpretation</h2>\n<p>The supported institutional path is Member State approval of a programme -&gt; WIPO sector work priority -&gt; Secretariat delivery and reporting. It is not evidence of an earmarked PSP-financed programme, a procurement vendor&#x27;s decision rights, or direct government control over merchant decisions. WIPO&#x27;s general service-fee financing weakens a simplistic assumption that the presence of payment companies proves they financed this particular tool. It does not exclude a specific contribution or contract that the acquired records do not disclose.</p>\n<p>A public delivery commitment can precede completion. A development demo, pilot, budget allocation and later public recap cannot be pooled into a single claim of an operating global cutoff system. Conversely, the absence of a Pay line in this high-level performance narrative is too weak to suggest abandonment: the more specific June programme records establish work that this annual document does not separately itemize.</p>\n<p>The highest-value missing resource instrument is an ALERT-PAY project authorization/workplan or procurement/engagement record identifying the cost centre, named delivery role, milestones, acceptance owner and recurrent operating allocation. For exercised effect, the useful counterpart is an attributable provider outcome statement or aggregate pilot evaluation separating warnings, withdrawal of goods, site disappearance, false logos and actual merchant restrictions. No private case file or harmful list contents are needed to state that missing distinction.</p>\n<h2 id=\"finite-search-and-custody-scope\">Finite search and custody scope</h2>\n<p>Six discovery queries were run in two batches: <code>site:wipo.int &quot;ALERT-PAY&quot;</code>; <code>site:wipo.int &quot;ALERT PAY&quot; funding budget procurement</code>; <code>site:ungm.org &quot;ALERT&quot; &quot;WIPO&quot;</code>; <code>&quot;WIPO ALERT-PAY&quot; launch August September 2026 procurement</code>; <code>&quot;WIPO ALERT PAY&quot; tender software contract budget</code>; <code>site:wipo.int &quot;Program of Work and Budget 2026/27&quot; approved Assemblies July 2025</code>. Returned candidates were assessed; no exact public Pay contract, award notice or post-June launch instrument was located. This was not an exhaustive procurement-archive audit. WIPOPay service-fee material, advertising ALERT and Brazilian domestic lists were excluded as different instruments. A later keynote and webcast were discovery candidates only; the root already owns the decisive webcast scope, so they were not separately promoted here.</p>\n<p>Five ordinary unauthenticated GETs succeeded with HTTP200. No acquisition route failed or was bypassed. The original PDF text was machine-extracted for targeted reading; neither PDF was visually audited in this lane. A case-insensitive scan of the 142-page performance-report text found no ALERT product-name occurrence; the relevant ER2.3 narrative/table were then actually read. This is not a full report read and is not a claim about text inside unextracted images. Exact byte hashes, dates and scoped-read extents are in <code>resources-captures.json</code>. Supporting extracts are derived convenience files and never replace their originals.</p>\n<h2 id=\"candidate-relations-not-canonical-edits\">Candidate relations, not canonical edits</h2>\n<p>WIPO Member States -&gt; WIPO 2026/27 programme: approved July2025 (source-record statement on official budget page).</p>\n<p>WIPO 2026/27 programme -&gt; ALERT-PAY: planned deployment priority (programme decision; no project amount assigned).</p>\n<p>WIPO Director General -&gt; Member States: presents biennial programme; WIPO -&gt; Member States: annual performance reporting (public accountability route; no product acceptance right inferred).</p>\n<p>WIPO GCP ER2.3 -&gt; reported2024/25 expenditure: CHF3.207m, broad result only. Keep this context in notes if a separate budget node would misleadingly suggest a Pay allocation.</p>\n<p>WIPO -&gt; August2026 ACE recap: retrospective announcement of a June update (not launch or operational outcome).</p>",
        "path": "wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09/resources-delivery.md",
        "sourceIds": [
          "w30-class-s-wipo-budget",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-recap",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-approval",
          "w30-class-s-wipo-spend"
        ],
        "markdown": "Acquisition closed on 9 September 2026. This lane read public WIPO planning, reporting and announcement records. It did not operate the system, inspect flagged sites, identify customers, or contact anyone. The core presentation, activity report and indexed webcast are owned by the root lane and were not reacquired here.\n\n## What the resource record establishes\n\nALERT-PAY is a named deliverable in WIPO's approved work programme, rather than only an informal proposal. The current official budget page says Member States approved the 2026/27 programme in July 2025 and describes the Director General's submission and annual performance-reporting route. The same page links the exact budget PDF retained here. About 96% of WIPO's projected income comes from its IP-system service fees; this is organization-wide financing, not an ALERT-PAY earmark. Official budget and accountability page (see source references) substantive body from its opening July-approval paragraph through Reporting and monitoring; original `resources-budget-approval.html`.\n\nThe programme's Global Challenges and Partnerships section places ALERT-PAY deployment among Building Respect for IP priorities for 2026/27. The budget allocates CHF2.858 million to the broader Expected Result 2.3 (international dialogue/cooperation on Building Respect for IP) and CHF31.319 million to the whole sector. Neither is a disclosed ALERT-PAY allocation. Its ER2.3 performance indicator concerns implementation of the ACE agenda, not a numerical payment-account closure target. The adjacent trust-fund estimates are also not an attribution of funding to this product; the annex expressly qualifies estimated contributions. Approved programme (see source references) PDF54-55 / printed53-54 (priority), PDF57-59 / printed56-58 (indicator/resources), PDF114 / printed113 (estimate qualification). Source-derived text scope, not an expenditure audit.\n\nThe current linked 2024/25 Performance Report supplies an actual expenditure state at a broader level: CHF3.207 million for ER2.3 and CHF26.887 million for the GCP sector. Its expenditure note defines figures as pre-IPSAS actual expenditure. These are not Pay project costs or bank transfers. The ER2.3 narrative and dashboard document policy dialogue, studies, awareness and training, but do not separately certify the Pay pilot, its payment-provider actions or software acceptance. Performance Report 2024/25 (see source references) PDF10-11 / printed9-10; PDF25 / printed24; PDF28 / printed27 ER2.3 row; PDF70 / printed69. Its publication date was not independently established; the title identifies the reporting period. This is a WIPO self-report to Member States, not outside validation of particular outcomes.\n\n## What later announcements do and do not establish\n\nThe July 2024 Director General report already announced the forthcoming Pay module. Its adjacent count of more than 8,000 live sites describes advertising ALERT, not Pay. This is historical programme intention. Director General report, Assemblies July 9-17, 2024 (see source references) heading and the Building Respect for IP/ALERT paragraph only; the whole speech was not substantively reviewed.\n\nThe later official ACE recap was published 5 August 2026 and explicitly describes the June 2-4 meeting. It says the Secretariat shared an update on the Pay initiative. It supplies neither an online launch date nor new post-pilot outcome figures. Do not recast the recap's publication date as a deployment event. ACE/18 recap (see source references) full substantive article and publication date read from retained original, `resources-ace-aug2026.html`.\n\nThe root lane's retained June2026 presentation/activity documents are the relevant evidence for the manual pilot and development phase. This lane does not independently corroborate payment suspensions, the identities of the two pilot providers, or the causal mechanism behind the reported removal percentage. No later launch or independently measured outcome was located in the finite search below. That is a search boundary, not a conclusion that launch never occurred.\n\n## Explanatory significance and competing interpretation\n\nThe supported institutional path is Member State approval of a programme -> WIPO sector work priority -> Secretariat delivery and reporting. It is not evidence of an earmarked PSP-financed programme, a procurement vendor's decision rights, or direct government control over merchant decisions. WIPO's general service-fee financing weakens a simplistic assumption that the presence of payment companies proves they financed this particular tool. It does not exclude a specific contribution or contract that the acquired records do not disclose.\n\nA public delivery commitment can precede completion. A development demo, pilot, budget allocation and later public recap cannot be pooled into a single claim of an operating global cutoff system. Conversely, the absence of a Pay line in this high-level performance narrative is too weak to suggest abandonment: the more specific June programme records establish work that this annual document does not separately itemize.\n\nThe highest-value missing resource instrument is an ALERT-PAY project authorization/workplan or procurement/engagement record identifying the cost centre, named delivery role, milestones, acceptance owner and recurrent operating allocation. For exercised effect, the useful counterpart is an attributable provider outcome statement or aggregate pilot evaluation separating warnings, withdrawal of goods, site disappearance, false logos and actual merchant restrictions. No private case file or harmful list contents are needed to state that missing distinction.\n\n## Finite search and custody scope\n\nSix discovery queries were run in two batches: `site:wipo.int \"ALERT-PAY\"`; `site:wipo.int \"ALERT PAY\" funding budget procurement`; `site:ungm.org \"ALERT\" \"WIPO\"`; `\"WIPO ALERT-PAY\" launch August September 2026 procurement`; `\"WIPO ALERT PAY\" tender software contract budget`; `site:wipo.int \"Program of Work and Budget 2026/27\" approved Assemblies July 2025`. Returned candidates were assessed; no exact public Pay contract, award notice or post-June launch instrument was located. This was not an exhaustive procurement-archive audit. WIPOPay service-fee material, advertising ALERT and Brazilian domestic lists were excluded as different instruments. A later keynote and webcast were discovery candidates only; the root already owns the decisive webcast scope, so they were not separately promoted here.\n\nFive ordinary unauthenticated GETs succeeded with HTTP200. No acquisition route failed or was bypassed. The original PDF text was machine-extracted for targeted reading; neither PDF was visually audited in this lane. A case-insensitive scan of the 142-page performance-report text found no ALERT product-name occurrence; the relevant ER2.3 narrative/table were then actually read. This is not a full report read and is not a claim about text inside unextracted images. Exact byte hashes, dates and scoped-read extents are in `resources-captures.json`. Supporting extracts are derived convenience files and never replace their originals.\n\n## Candidate relations, not canonical edits\n\nWIPO Member States -> WIPO 2026/27 programme: approved July2025 (source-record statement on official budget page).\n\nWIPO 2026/27 programme -> ALERT-PAY: planned deployment priority (programme decision; no project amount assigned).\n\nWIPO Director General -> Member States: presents biennial programme; WIPO -> Member States: annual performance reporting (public accountability route; no product acceptance right inferred).\n\nWIPO GCP ER2.3 -> reported2024/25 expenditure: CHF3.207m, broad result only. Keep this context in notes if a separate budget node would misleadingly suggest a Pay allocation.\n\nWIPO -> August2026 ACE recap: retrospective announcement of a June update (not launch or operational outcome).\n",
        "file": "research/wipo-payment-wave-2026-09-09-resources-delivery.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index",
        "title": "Claim and evidence index",
        "description": "This index accompanies the current consolidated account. Stable IDs below are checked against accepted r33, including the six additional packets. Scoped note anchors retain the evidence and read limits behind those graph relationships. Several edges can depend on one source. These are traceable evidence bundles, not independent witness counts. The account an",
        "html": "<p>This index accompanies the current consolidated account. Stable IDs below are checked against accepted r33, including the six additional packets. Scoped note anchors retain the evidence and read limits behind those graph relationships. Several edges can depend on one source. These are traceable evidence bundles, not independent witness counts. The account and index use the retained 9 September 2026 cutoff.</p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a1-fli-resources\">A1 — FLI resources</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>e44</code>, <code>e46</code>, <code>w2-fli-e-lightcone25</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>src-e4e7930e8216</code>, <code>w2-fli-s-audit25</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings\">Fli findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/tegmark-lightcone-followup\">Tegmark lightcone followup</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a2-creator-mechanisms\">A2 — Creator mechanisms</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>e74</code>, <code>w1-creator-e-pf-terms</code>, <code>w1-creator-e-output-fli</code>, <code>w1-creator-e-frame-ltff</code>, <code>w1-creator-e-frame-aitof</code>, <code>w1-creator-e-rational-partnership</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>src-65df3f2c31b3</code>, <code>src-c33ab812f862</code>, <code>w1-creator-s-controlai-rational</code>, <code>w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script</code>, <code>w1-creator-s-mateus</code>, <code>w1-creator-s-rational</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings\">Creator findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a3-controlai-authority\">A3 — ControlAI authority</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority</code>, <code>w1-controlai-e-us-payable</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w1-controlai-s-uk-articles</code>, <code>w1-controlai-s-us-return</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings\">Controlai findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a4-red-lines-production\">A4 — Red Lines production</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w8-red-e-work-segerie</code>, <code>w8-red-e-work-niki</code>, <code>w8-red-e-work-controlai</code>, <code>w8-red-e-work-fli</code>, <code>w8-red-e-signature-hubinger</code>, <code>w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w8-red-s-ack</code>, <code>w8-red-s-controlai</code>, <code>w8-red-s-signatories</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation\">Campaign formation</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a5-common-donor-and-divergent-interventions\">A5 — Common donor and divergent interventions</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w31-fa-e-oakcma</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-oakdff</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-swcsaposition</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>src-12639f108d96</code>, <code>src-5046aaa630e7</code>, <code>w31-fa-s-swcsa</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-judgment</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence\">Statewatch divergence</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings\">Proceedings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a6-selection-and-execution\">A6 — Selection and execution</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w32-gdi-e-peerselection</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-staffsupport</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-terms</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-juneselection</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w31-fa-s-dffround</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-dffadoption</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-dffpeer</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance\">Allocation governance</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a7-duty-model-and-narrowing\">A7 — Duty model and narrowing</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w10-duty-e-carnegie-review</code>, <code>w10-duty-e-reset-review</code>, <code>w10-duty-e-review-draft</code>, <code>w10-duty-e-research-narrower</code>, <code>w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme</code>, <code>w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w10-duty-s-announcement</code>, <code>w10-duty-s-carnegie2022</code>, <code>w10-duty-s-draft</code>, <code>w10-duty-s-reset70</code>, <code>w10-duty-s-review</code>, <code>w11-fund-s-carnegie2021</code>, <code>w11-fund-s-carnegie2023</code>, <code>w11-fund-s-functioning-report</code>, <code>w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority\">Operative authority</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage\">Policy lineage</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a8-uk-method-choice-and-selective-uptake\">A8 — UK method choice and selective uptake</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w7-policy-e-email-accepted</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-checks</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-clearance</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-ffinput</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation</code>, <code>w31-fa-e-declinemonetization</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w31-fa-s-cmasub</code>, <code>w31-fa-s-crisis</code>, <code>w31-fa-s-fullfact</code>, <code>w7-policy-s-part5</code>, <code>w7-policy-s-statement2025</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings\">Policy findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings\">Submission findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status\">Disposition status</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin\">Fullfact origin</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a9-shared-signals\">A9 — Shared signals</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w22-sig-e-meta-case</code>, <code>w22-sig-e-case-signals</code>, <code>w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w22-sig-s-report2025</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern\">Lantern</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review\">Lantern rights review</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a10-interfaces-and-correction\">A10 — Interfaces and correction</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf</code>, <code>w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions</code>, <code>w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback</code>, <code>w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter</code>, <code>w26-ver-s-archive-feedback</code>, <code>w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api</code>, <code>w26-ver-s-ohf-control</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access\">Archive access</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol\">Correction protocol</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-protocol-independent-review\">Protocol independent review</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a11-match-and-judicial-bridge\">A11 — MATCH and judicial bridge</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w30-class-e-match-inquiry</code>, <code>w30-class-e-stripe-policy</code>, <code>w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect</code>, <code>w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball</code>, <code>w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w30-class-s-egumball2025</code>, <code>w30-class-s-filmon-opinion</code>, <code>w30-class-s-match-rules</code>, <code>w30-class-s-stripe-match</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation\">Acquirer implementation</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition\">Later disposition</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a12-customer-remedies\">A12 — Customer remedies</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w23-cash-e-restriction-duty</code>, <code>w23-cash-e-historical-recourse</code>, <code>w24-ag-e-july-assent</code>, <code>w24-ag-e-july-redress</code>, <code>w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb</code>, <code>w24-ag-e-fallback-approval</code>, <code>w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w23-cash-s-cfpb-order</code>, <code>w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2</code>, <code>w24-ag-s-july-ca</code>, <code>w24-ag-s-july-or</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb\">Cfpb</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a13-police-and-infrastructure\">A13 — Police and infrastructure</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w29-enf-e-iwf-historical-membership</code>, <code>w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo</code>, <code>w30-class-e-creative-tactics</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w29-enf-s-funding2026</code>, <code>w29-enf-s-iwf2013</code>, <code>w30-class-s-creative-guidance</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority\">Policy authority</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources\">Funding resources</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority\">List authority</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission\">Origins transmission</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a14-dv-and-counterpressure\">A14 — DV and counterpressure</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure</code>, <code>w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category</code>, <code>w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category</code>, <code>w30-class-e-tag-determination</code>, <code>w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w30-class-s-dv-complaint</code>, <code>w30-class-s-dv-defaults</code>, <code>w30-class-s-dv-progress</code>, <code>w30-class-s-senate-tag</code>, <code>w30-class-s-tag-release</code>, <code>w30-class-s-tag-report</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure\">Policy pressure</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority\">Category authority</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product\">Current product</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a15-dated-stablecoin-supplement\">A15 — Dated stablecoin supplement</h2>\n<p>Scoped retained notes are the evidence anchors; no supplemental graph relationship is invented.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09\">Stablecoin control check 2026 09 09</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a16-gdi-historical-discontinuity-and-recourse\">A16 — GDI historical discontinuity and recourse</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-oracleend</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-appealstanding</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w32-gdi-s-fonevidence</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-iasexit</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-oracle</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-oracleend</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism\">Gdi mechanism</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings\">Recourse findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a17-research-funding-and-proposed-use\">A17 — Research funding and proposed use</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w32-gdi-e-fundedremit</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-ecgerman</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-warningmethod</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation</code>, <code>w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w32-gdi-s-cdmd</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-cordis</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-d21</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-finalreport</code>, <code>w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings\">Fcdo findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings\">Horizon findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings\">Classification findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a18-access-gates\">A18 — Access gates</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w33-con-e-vetting</code>, <code>w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure</code>, <code>w33-con-e-publicaccess</code>, <code>w33-con-e-priority</code>, <code>w33-con-e-publish</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w33-con-s-definition</code>, <code>w33-con-s-delegated</code>, <code>w33-con-s-dsa</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings\">Root law findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings\">Gates findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a19-binding-access-oversight\">A19 — Binding access oversight</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w33-con-e-nominatepay</code>, <code>w33-con-e-approveankura</code>, <code>w33-con-e-mandate</code>, <code>w33-con-e-monitor</code>, <code>w33-con-e-trustreport</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w33-con-s-decision</code>, <code>w33-con-s-trustee</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism\">Commitment mechanism</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings\">Root enforcement findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a20-positive-readiness-and-no-approvals\">A20 — Positive readiness and no approvals</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w33-con-e-ftiopinion</code>, <code>w33-con-e-noapprovals</code>, <code>w33-con-e-legalprocess</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w33-con-s-audit</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings\">Root audit findings</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-oversight-findings\">Oversight findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a21-voluntary-reports-and-unresolved-counts\">A21 — Voluntary reports and unresolved counts</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes</code>, <code>w33-con-e-alientry</code>, <code>w33-con-e-reasons</code>, <code>w33-con-e-mercator</code>, <code>w33-con-e-bmftr</code>, <code>w33-con-e-berlin</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w33-con-s-entry</code>, <code>w33-con-s-paper</code>, <code>w33-con-s-tracker</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading\">Root reading</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings\">Application findings</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a22-cross-domain-interpretation\">A22 — Cross-domain interpretation</h2>\n<p>Analytical comparison of the preceding evidence. No universal cross-domain pipeline is asserted.</p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a23-cddp-evaluation-and-funding-gates\">A23 — CDDP evaluation and funding gates</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w33-con-e-owcommission</code>, <code>w33-con-e-evalscope</code>, <code>w33-con-e-treasurygate</code>, <code>w33-con-e-satisfaction</code>, <code>w33-con-e-pilotfunding</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w16-supp-s-foi-bundle</code>, <code>w16-supp-s-foi-release</code>, <code>w33-con-s-round2</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance\">Evaluation and acceptance</a></p>\n<p><a></a></p>\n<h2 id=\"a24-osdi-governance-evaluation-reuse-and-public-participation\">A24 — OSDI governance, evaluation reuse and PUBLIC participation</h2>\n<p>Case relationships: <code>w33-con-e-chairs</code>, <code>w33-con-e-woodgroup</code>, <code>w33-con-e-paevaluate</code>, <code>w33-con-e-publicosdi</code>, <code>w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery</code>, <code>w33-con-e-methodreuse</code>, <code>w33-con-e-publiccddp</code>, <code>w33-con-e-subapproval</code>.</p>\n<p>Source records: <code>w16-supp-s-foi-bundle</code>, <code>w33-con-s-cdei</code>, <code>w33-con-s-osdiabout</code>, <code>w33-con-s-pa</code>, <code>w33-con-s-publicclaim</code>, <code>w33-con-s-sandbox</code>, <code>w33-con-s-stcf</code>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market\">Osdi governance market</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output\">Osdi evaluation output</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/research/osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp\">Public cddp</a></p>\n<h2 id=\"reading-limits\">Reading limits</h2>\n<p>This synthesis uses accepted case records and retained research, with complete reading of the decisive newer notes and selected earlier scopes. It is not a fresh read of every original, all 365 audit pages or every historical branch. Source records retain access states, reading scopes and custody distinctions. The original three-part worker narrative and independent review were delivered in the task when the child hosts could not persist files. Root authored the final account, added the older evaluation/OSDI evidence and checked these references.</p>",
        "path": "consolidation-wave-2026-09-09/synthesis/claim-index.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "This index accompanies the current consolidated account. Stable IDs below are checked against accepted r33, including the six additional packets. Scoped note anchors retain the evidence and read limits behind those graph relationships. Several edges can depend on one source. These are traceable evidence bundles, not independent witness counts. The account and index use the retained 9 September 2026 cutoff.\n\n## A1 — FLI resources\n\nCase relationships: `e44`, `e46`, `w2-fli-e-lightcone25`.\n\nSource records: `src-e4e7930e8216`, `w2-fli-s-audit25`.\n\n[Fli findings](red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-fli-findings.md)\n\n[Tegmark lightcone followup](tegmark-lightcone-followup.md)\n\n## A2 — Creator mechanisms\n\nCase relationships: `e74`, `w1-creator-e-pf-terms`, `w1-creator-e-output-fli`, `w1-creator-e-frame-ltff`, `w1-creator-e-frame-aitof`, `w1-creator-e-rational-partnership`.\n\nSource records: `src-65df3f2c31b3`, `src-c33ab812f862`, `w1-creator-s-controlai-rational`, `w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script`, `w1-creator-s-mateus`, `w1-creator-s-rational`.\n\n[Creator findings](red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-creator-findings.md)\n\n## A3 — ControlAI authority\n\nCase relationships: `w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority`, `w1-controlai-e-us-payable`.\n\nSource records: `w1-controlai-s-uk-articles`, `w1-controlai-s-us-return`.\n\n[Controlai findings](red-threads-wave-2026-09-08-controlai-findings.md)\n\n## A4 — Red Lines production\n\nCase relationships: `w8-red-e-work-segerie`, `w8-red-e-work-niki`, `w8-red-e-work-controlai`, `w8-red-e-work-fli`, `w8-red-e-signature-hubinger`, `w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation`.\n\nSource records: `w8-red-s-ack`, `w8-red-s-controlai`, `w8-red-s-signatories`.\n\n[Campaign formation](red-lines-wave-2026-09-09-campaign-formation.md)\n\n## A5 — Common donor and divergent interventions\n\nCase relationships: `w31-fa-e-oakcma`, `w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch`, `w31-fa-e-oakdff`, `w31-fa-e-swcsaposition`, `w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled`.\n\nSource records: `src-12639f108d96`, `src-5046aaa630e7`, `w31-fa-s-swcsa`, `w32-gdi-s-judgment`, `w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling`.\n\n[Statewatch divergence](oak-digital-rights-divergence-wave-2026-09-09-statewatch-divergence.md)\n\n[Proceedings](liberty-tcn-proceedings-wave-2026-09-09-proceedings.md)\n\n## A6 — Selection and execution\n\nCase relationships: `w32-gdi-e-peerselection`, `w32-gdi-e-staffsupport`, `w32-gdi-e-terms`, `w32-gdi-e-juneselection`.\n\nSource records: `w31-fa-s-dffround`, `w32-gdi-s-dffadoption`, `w32-gdi-s-dffpeer`.\n\n[Allocation governance](dff-allocation-governance-wave-2026-09-09-allocation-governance.md)\n\n## A7 — Duty model and narrowing\n\nCase relationships: `w10-duty-e-carnegie-review`, `w10-duty-e-reset-review`, `w10-duty-e-review-draft`, `w10-duty-e-research-narrower`, `w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme`, `w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning`.\n\nSource records: `w10-duty-s-announcement`, `w10-duty-s-carnegie2022`, `w10-duty-s-draft`, `w10-duty-s-reset70`, `w10-duty-s-review`, `w11-fund-s-carnegie2021`, `w11-fund-s-carnegie2023`, `w11-fund-s-functioning-report`, `w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions`.\n\n[Operative authority](duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-operative-authority.md)\n\n[Policy lineage](duty-care-wave-2026-09-09-policy-lineage.md)\n\n## A8 — UK method choice and selective uptake\n\nCase relationships: `w7-policy-e-email-accepted`, `w31-fa-e-checks`, `w31-fa-e-clearance`, `w31-fa-e-ffinput`, `w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation`, `w31-fa-e-declinemonetization`.\n\nSource records: `w31-fa-s-cmasub`, `w31-fa-s-crisis`, `w31-fa-s-fullfact`, `w7-policy-s-part5`, `w7-policy-s-statement2025`.\n\n[Policy findings](uk-age-wave-2026-09-09-policy-findings.md)\n\n[Submission findings](cma-ofcom-monetization-wave-2026-09-09-submission-findings.md)\n\n[Disposition status](ofcom-crisis-authority-wave-2026-09-09-disposition-status.md)\n\n[Fullfact origin](ministerial-notice-origins-wave-2026-09-09-fullfact-origin.md)\n\n## A9 — Shared signals\n\nCase relationships: `w22-sig-e-meta-case`, `w22-sig-e-case-signals`, `w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome`.\n\nSource records: `w22-sig-s-report2025`.\n\n[Lantern](signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern.md)\n\n[Lantern rights review](signal-sharing-wave-2026-09-09-lantern-rights-review.md)\n\n## A10 — Interfaces and correction\n\nCase relationships: `w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf`, `w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions`, `w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback`, `w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input`.\n\nSource records: `w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter`, `w26-ver-s-archive-feedback`, `w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api`, `w26-ver-s-ohf-control`.\n\n[Archive access](tcap-delivery-wave-2026-09-09-archive-access.md)\n\n[Correction protocol](signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-correction-protocol.md)\n\n[Protocol independent review](signal-protocol-wave-2026-09-09-protocol-independent-review.md)\n\n## A11 — MATCH and judicial bridge\n\nCase relationships: `w30-class-e-match-inquiry`, `w30-class-e-stripe-policy`, `w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect`, `w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball`, `w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition`.\n\nSource records: `w30-class-s-egumball2025`, `w30-class-s-filmon-opinion`, `w30-class-s-match-rules`, `w30-class-s-stripe-match`.\n\n[Acquirer implementation](payment-termination-wave-2026-09-09-acquirer-implementation.md)\n\n[Later disposition](egumball-disposition-wave-2026-09-09-later-disposition.md)\n\n## A12 — Customer remedies\n\nCase relationships: `w23-cash-e-restriction-duty`, `w23-cash-e-historical-recourse`, `w24-ag-e-july-assent`, `w24-ag-e-july-redress`, `w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb`, `w24-ag-e-fallback-approval`, `w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement`.\n\nSource records: `w23-cash-s-cfpb-order`, `w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2`, `w24-ag-s-july-ca`, `w24-ag-s-july-or`.\n\n[Cfpb](cashapp-regulator-wave-2026-09-09-cfpb.md)\n\n## A13 — Police and infrastructure\n\nCase relationships: `w29-enf-e-iwf-historical-membership`, `w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo`, `w30-class-e-creative-tactics`.\n\nSource records: `w29-enf-s-funding2026`, `w29-enf-s-iwf2013`, `w30-class-s-creative-guidance`.\n\n[Policy authority](nominet-domain-authority-wave-2026-09-09-policy-authority.md)\n\n[Funding resources](pipcu-resources-wave-2026-09-09-funding-resources.md)\n\n[List authority](creative-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-list-authority.md)\n\n[Origins transmission](kybc-policy-wave-2026-09-09-origins-transmission.md)\n\n## A14 — DV and counterpressure\n\nCase relationships: `w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure`, `w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category`, `w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category`, `w30-class-e-tag-determination`, `w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation`.\n\nSource records: `w30-class-s-dv-complaint`, `w30-class-s-dv-defaults`, `w30-class-s-dv-progress`, `w30-class-s-senate-tag`, `w30-class-s-tag-release`, `w30-class-s-tag-report`.\n\n[Policy pressure](dv-policy-pressure-wave-2026-09-09-policy-pressure.md)\n\n[Category authority](ncmec-advertising-input-wave-2026-09-09-category-authority.md)\n\n[Current product](filmon-classification-wave-2026-09-09-current-product.md)\n\n## A15 — Dated stablecoin supplement\n\nScoped retained notes are the evidence anchors; no supplemental graph relationship is invented.\n\n[Stablecoin control check 2026 09 09](stablecoin-control-check-2026-09-09.md)\n\n## A16 — GDI historical discontinuity and recourse\n\nCase relationships: `w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages`, `w32-gdi-e-oracleend`, `w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues`, `w32-gdi-e-appealstanding`, `w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision`.\n\nSource records: `w32-gdi-s-fonevidence`, `w32-gdi-s-iasexit`, `w32-gdi-s-oracle`, `w32-gdi-s-oracleend`.\n\n[Gdi mechanism](gdi-resource-to-advertising-wave-2026-09-09-gdi-mechanism.md)\n\n[Recourse findings](gdi-classification-recourse-wave-2026-09-09-recourse-findings.md)\n\n## A17 — Research funding and proposed use\n\nCase relationships: `w32-gdi-e-fundedremit`, `w32-gdi-e-ecgerman`, `w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution`, `w32-gdi-e-warningmethod`, `w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation`, `w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole`.\n\nSource records: `w32-gdi-s-cdmd`, `w32-gdi-s-cordis`, `w32-gdi-s-d21`, `w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer`, `w32-gdi-s-finalreport`, `w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch`.\n\n[Fcdo findings](gdi-fcdo-remit-wave-2026-09-09-fcdo-findings.md)\n\n[Horizon findings](gdi-horizon-role-wave-2026-09-09-horizon-findings.md)\n\n[Classification findings](ai4trust-classification-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-classification-findings.md)\n\n## A18 — Access gates\n\nCase relationships: `w33-con-e-vetting`, `w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure`, `w33-con-e-publicaccess`, `w33-con-e-priority`, `w33-con-e-publish`.\n\nSource records: `w33-con-s-definition`, `w33-con-s-delegated`, `w33-con-s-dsa`.\n\n[Root law findings](dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-root-law-findings.md)\n\n[Gates findings](dsa-research-access-gates-wave-2026-09-09-gates-findings.md)\n\n## A19 — Binding access oversight\n\nCase relationships: `w33-con-e-nominatepay`, `w33-con-e-approveankura`, `w33-con-e-mandate`, `w33-con-e-monitor`, `w33-con-e-trustreport`.\n\nSource records: `w33-con-s-decision`, `w33-con-s-trustee`.\n\n[Commitment mechanism](dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-commitment-mechanism.md)\n\n[Root enforcement findings](dsa-access-enforcement-wave-2026-09-09-root-enforcement-findings.md)\n\n## A20 — Positive readiness and no approvals\n\nCase relationships: `w33-con-e-ftiopinion`, `w33-con-e-noapprovals`, `w33-con-e-legalprocess`.\n\nSource records: `w33-con-s-audit`.\n\n[Root audit findings](ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-root-audit-findings.md)\n\n[Oversight findings](ali-oversight-evidence-wave-2026-09-09-oversight-findings.md)\n\n## A21 — Voluntary reports and unresolved counts\n\nCase relationships: `w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes`, `w33-con-e-alientry`, `w33-con-e-reasons`, `w33-con-e-mercator`, `w33-con-e-bmftr`, `w33-con-e-berlin`.\n\nSource records: `w33-con-s-entry`, `w33-con-s-paper`, `w33-con-s-tracker`.\n\n[Root reading](dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-root-reading.md)\n\n[Application findings](dsa-application-decisions-wave-2026-09-09-application-findings.md)\n\n## A22 — Cross-domain interpretation\n\nAnalytical comparison of the preceding evidence. No universal cross-domain pipeline is asserted.\n\n## A23 — CDDP evaluation and funding gates\n\nCase relationships: `w33-con-e-owcommission`, `w33-con-e-evalscope`, `w33-con-e-treasurygate`, `w33-con-e-satisfaction`, `w33-con-e-pilotfunding`.\n\nSource records: `w16-supp-s-foi-bundle`, `w16-supp-s-foi-release`, `w33-con-s-round2`.\n\n[Evaluation and acceptance](evaluation-wave-2026-09-09-evaluation-and-acceptance.md)\n\n## A24 — OSDI governance, evaluation reuse and PUBLIC participation\n\nCase relationships: `w33-con-e-chairs`, `w33-con-e-woodgroup`, `w33-con-e-paevaluate`, `w33-con-e-publicosdi`, `w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery`, `w33-con-e-methodreuse`, `w33-con-e-publiccddp`, `w33-con-e-subapproval`.\n\nSource records: `w16-supp-s-foi-bundle`, `w33-con-s-cdei`, `w33-con-s-osdiabout`, `w33-con-s-pa`, `w33-con-s-publicclaim`, `w33-con-s-sandbox`, `w33-con-s-stcf`.\n\n[Osdi governance market](osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-governance-market.md)\n\n[Osdi evaluation output](osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-osdi-evaluation-output.md)\n\n[Public cddp](osdi-comparison-wave-2026-09-09-public-cddp.md)\n\n## Reading limits\n\nThis synthesis uses accepted case records and retained research, with complete reading of the decisive newer notes and selected earlier scopes. It is not a fresh read of every original, all 365 audit pages or every historical branch. Source records retain access states, reading scopes and custody distinctions. The original three-part worker narrative and independent review were delivered in the task when the child hosts could not persist files. Root authored the final account, added the older evaluation/OSDI evidence and checked these references.\n",
        "file": "research/consolidation-wave-2026-09-09-synthesis-claim-index.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings",
        "title": "Jacob Coxon: bounded resignation and network check",
        "description": "9 September 2026 local campaign date. User requested a look at Coxon's viral resignation before proceeding. Fresh check confined to public research credentials, the statement, directly relevant funding/advocacy links and chronology. No outreach, graph edit, ZIP rebuild or visible UI. r33 contains no Coxon or hilbertspaess record; these findings remain a sepa",
        "html": "<p>9 September 2026 local campaign date. User requested a look at Coxon&#x27;s viral resignation before proceeding. Fresh check confined to public research credentials, the statement, directly relevant funding/advocacy links and chronology. No outreach, graph edit, ZIP rebuild or visible UI. r33 contains no Coxon or hilbertspaess record; these findings remain a separate supplement.</p>\n<h2 id=\"assessment\">Assessment</h2>\n<p>Coxon has a verifiable technical publication record. OpenAI&#x27;s GPT-4o system card names him among contributors. The six-author paper Weight-sparse transformers have interpretable circuits credits him with optimization and circuit-pruning work, tasks and a circuit visualizer. Reading scope: author list and contribution statement, not full technical replication or verification of all employment dates.</p>\n<p>[GPT-4o system card](http[local research file] PDF26; [sparse-transformer paper](http[local research file] PDF1 and32. OpenAI&#x27;s emergent-misalignment paper thanks both Coxon and Evan Hubinger for feedback; shared acknowledgment does not itself establish direct collaboration between them.</p>\n<p>His seven-post statement reports resignation, attributes private fears to lab colleagues, forecasts dangerous capabilities and advocates coordinated pacing with a possible temporary capability-development ban. These are distinct testimony, forecasts and policy positions. The thread supplies no underlying internal documents or quantitative extinction-risk derivation. Native X failed; all seven posts were read through the [Thread Reader mirror](http[local research file] September8 US evening versus September9 UTC is consistent with the displayed date difference. Exact native rendering was not inspected.</p>\n<h2 id=\"financial-record\">Financial record</h2>\n<p>The ProPublica-rendered IRS return for Good Ventures Foundation, EIN46-1008520, TAX YEAR2022, covering1July2022 to30June2023 and submitted15May2024, names JACOB COXON in PartXV3a Paid during the year. Amount USD20,159; purpose Long-Term Future Scholarship Program - Research Scholarship. Exact-name scholarship recipient match is verified in the filing; independent confirmation that this is the researcher has not been acquired. The earlier fiscal-year-endingJune2022 return had no Coxon text match. It is inaccurate to silently treat the TY2022 label as a proved calendar2022 payment date.</p>\n<p>The same return names Cari Tuna as president/director and Dustin Moskovitz as secretary/treasurer/director. This connects the named scholarship to the foundation&#x27;s governance. It supplies no present campaign compensation, scholarship conditions, continuing obligation or instruction concerning this resignation. Personal recipient address is deliberately omitted from this note; the public filing remains in the separate original capture.</p>\n<p>[Full filing landing page](http[local research file] [rendered IRS990PF](http[local research file] Ordinary public GET supplied the readable return after the web reader could not fetch the embedded rendering. Scoped reading: header/tax period, named grant row and paid-section label, officer rows; not full financial audit.</p>\n<h2 id=\"advocacy-and-institutional-response\">Advocacy and institutional response</h2>\n<p>Andrea Miotti&#x27;s9September ControlAI article leads with Coxon&#x27;s resignation, then describes ControlAI&#x27;s UK/US legislative work. This establishes use of the statement in advocacy. Miotti claims ControlAI supplied the UK bill, consulted on the Sanders-Casar framework and drafted a government kill-switch amendment. These role claims are attributed to ControlAI. The article distinguishes its narrower precursor/ASI approach from the US proposal&#x27;s broader temporary advanced-AI pause. It establishes neither sponsorship of Coxon&#x27;s departure nor advance media coordination.</p>\n<p>[Miotti article](http[local research file] Full substantive article read via ordinary publisher GET. Government chronology checked separately: Sanders&#x27; official3September announcement describes forthcoming legislation, permanent ASI prohibition, a temporary advanced-development pause and a new cabinet-level regulator/advisory board. That announcement predates Coxon&#x27;s resignation. Announcement is not enactment or a complete bill-text analysis.</p>\n<p>[Sanders announcement](http[local research file]</p>\n<p>ABC reports Hubinger publicly agreed with the danger concerns while saying Anthropic was trying its best and lacked a settled superintelligence-alignment plan. His personal greater-than10percent next-decade estimate is not an established probability. Native X reply was not fetched; [ABC&#x27;s report](http[local research file] supplies the accessible attributed text. Existing publication overlap is a separate and weaker relationship than this response.</p>\n<p>Coxon told Axios he left before Anthropic equity vested, retains OpenAI equity, and had not observed Anthropic compromising safety. [Axios interview](http[local research file]</p>\n<h2 id=\"forest-and-next-discriminator\">Forest and next discriminator</h2>\n<p>The supported structural finding is public translation of a technically credentialed researcher&#x27;s warning into an existing legislative campaign. Scholarship history, sincere conviction, publication relationships, media planning and advocacy use can coexist, but are distinct propositions. No acquired evidence establishes paid resignation, covert direction, an NGO employment role or private coordination of the rollout. Claims about first quote-post order and precise amplification timing encountered in social commentary were not verified and are not promoted.</p>\n<p>Most informative next records, if pursued: recipient confirmation and scholarship terms; actual advance briefing/communications arrangements; Coxon&#x27;s next institutional role or funding; and whether policymakers explicitly use his testimony to justify particular operative powers. Broad acquisition stops at this bounded check. The existing consolidated explorer remains frozen.</p>",
        "path": "coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09/findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "9 September 2026 local campaign date. User requested a look at Coxon's viral resignation before proceeding. Fresh check confined to public research credentials, the statement, directly relevant funding/advocacy links and chronology. No outreach, graph edit, ZIP rebuild or visible UI. r33 contains no Coxon or hilbertspaess record; these findings remain a separate supplement.\n\n## Assessment\n\nCoxon has a verifiable technical publication record. OpenAI's GPT-4o system card names him among contributors. The six-author paper Weight-sparse transformers have interpretable circuits credits him with optimization and circuit-pruning work, tasks and a circuit visualizer. Reading scope: author list and contribution statement, not full technical replication or verification of all employment dates.\n\nGPT-4o system card (see source references) PDF26; sparse-transformer paper (see source references) PDF1 and32. OpenAI's emergent-misalignment paper thanks both Coxon and Evan Hubinger for feedback; shared acknowledgment does not itself establish direct collaboration between them.\n\nHis seven-post statement reports resignation, attributes private fears to lab colleagues, forecasts dangerous capabilities and advocates coordinated pacing with a possible temporary capability-development ban. These are distinct testimony, forecasts and policy positions. The thread supplies no underlying internal documents or quantitative extinction-risk derivation. Native X failed; all seven posts were read through the Thread Reader mirror (see source references) September8 US evening versus September9 UTC is consistent with the displayed date difference. Exact native rendering was not inspected.\n\n## Financial record\n\nThe ProPublica-rendered IRS return for Good Ventures Foundation, EIN46-1008520, TAX YEAR2022, covering1July2022 to30June2023 and submitted15May2024, names JACOB COXON in PartXV3a Paid during the year. Amount USD20,159; purpose Long-Term Future Scholarship Program - Research Scholarship. Exact-name scholarship recipient match is verified in the filing; independent confirmation that this is the researcher has not been acquired. The earlier fiscal-year-endingJune2022 return had no Coxon text match. It is inaccurate to silently treat the TY2022 label as a proved calendar2022 payment date.\n\nThe same return names Cari Tuna as president/director and Dustin Moskovitz as secretary/treasurer/director. This connects the named scholarship to the foundation's governance. It supplies no present campaign compensation, scholarship conditions, continuing obligation or instruction concerning this resignation. Personal recipient address is deliberately omitted from this note; the public filing remains in the separate original capture.\n\nFull filing landing page (see source references) rendered IRS990PF (see source references) Ordinary public GET supplied the readable return after the web reader could not fetch the embedded rendering. Scoped reading: header/tax period, named grant row and paid-section label, officer rows; not full financial audit.\n\n## Advocacy and institutional response\n\nAndrea Miotti's9September ControlAI article leads with Coxon's resignation, then describes ControlAI's UK/US legislative work. This establishes use of the statement in advocacy. Miotti claims ControlAI supplied the UK bill, consulted on the Sanders-Casar framework and drafted a government kill-switch amendment. These role claims are attributed to ControlAI. The article distinguishes its narrower precursor/ASI approach from the US proposal's broader temporary advanced-AI pause. It establishes neither sponsorship of Coxon's departure nor advance media coordination.\n\nMiotti article (see source references) Full substantive article read via ordinary publisher GET. Government chronology checked separately: Sanders' official3September announcement describes forthcoming legislation, permanent ASI prohibition, a temporary advanced-development pause and a new cabinet-level regulator/advisory board. That announcement predates Coxon's resignation. Announcement is not enactment or a complete bill-text analysis.\n\nSanders announcement (see source references)\n\nABC reports Hubinger publicly agreed with the danger concerns while saying Anthropic was trying its best and lacked a settled superintelligence-alignment plan. His personal greater-than10percent next-decade estimate is not an established probability. Native X reply was not fetched; ABC's report (see source references) supplies the accessible attributed text. Existing publication overlap is a separate and weaker relationship than this response.\n\nCoxon told Axios he left before Anthropic equity vested, retains OpenAI equity, and had not observed Anthropic compromising safety. Axios interview (see source references)\n\n## Forest and next discriminator\n\nThe supported structural finding is public translation of a technically credentialed researcher's warning into an existing legislative campaign. Scholarship history, sincere conviction, publication relationships, media planning and advocacy use can coexist, but are distinct propositions. No acquired evidence establishes paid resignation, covert direction, an NGO employment role or private coordination of the rollout. Claims about first quote-post order and precise amplification timing encountered in social commentary were not verified and are not promoted.\n\nMost informative next records, if pursued: recipient confirmation and scholarship terms; actual advance briefing/communications arrangements; Coxon's next institutional role or funding; and whether policymakers explicitly use his testimony to justify particular operative powers. Broad acquisition stops at this bounded check. The existing consolidated explorer remains frozen.\n",
        "file": "research/coxon-resignation-check-2026-09-09-findings.md"
      }
    ],
    "maps": [
      {
        "id": "oakfunding",
        "title": "Oak’s grants to five organisations",
        "description": "Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.",
        "boundary": "Reported awards are not annual expenditure or payment receipts. Contracting Oak entities and grant-specific terms remain limited. No traced allocation from Oak to the later Liberty case is established.",
        "topic": "Resources & divergence",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "oak",
            "title": "Oak Foundation",
            "sub": "Three-year awards; cash unverified",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "5rights",
            "title": "5Rights",
            "sub": "USD 2,000,000 · 3 years · 2023 award",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "weprotect",
            "title": "WeProtect",
            "sub": "USD 2,368,421 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "USD 600,000 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-statewatch",
            "title": "Statewatch",
            "sub": "USD 303,622 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dff",
            "title": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "sub": "USD 631,579 · 3 years · 2025 report",
            "pos": [
              5,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e160",
          "e161",
          "w31-fa-e-oakcma",
          "w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch",
          "w31-fa-e-oakdff"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "divergence",
        "title": "Where Oak-funded organisations disagree",
        "description": "Statewatch endorsed a CSA objection and an OSA safeguards letter. The WeProtect Secretariat supported the CSA initiative with safeguards. DFF separately reports funding Liberty’s TCN challenge.",
        "boundary": "The CSA positions concern different dates/drafts. Statewatch’s 2023 objection predates the 2025 Oak grant. TCN litigation concerns IPA powers, not an OSA/age-ID case. Later governance and procedural records are now accessible in the DFF and court views; no merits or grant-payment result is inferred.",
        "topic": "Resources & divergence",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "wp-secretariat",
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat",
            "sub": "Supports CSA initiative; Secretariat only",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "eu-csa-proposal",
            "title": "EU CSA proposal",
            "sub": "Different dates and draft contexts",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-swcsa",
            "title": "CSA objection · 2023",
            "sub": "Rights/security safeguards requested",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-statewatch",
            "title": "Statewatch",
            "sub": "Dated objections and safeguards",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dff",
            "title": "Digital Freedom Fund",
            "sub": "Core grant; separate case allocation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
            "title": "Liberty",
            "sub": "Reported €36,000 litigation grant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-tcn",
            "title": "TCN challenge",
            "sub": "IPA regime; separate from OSA",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-swletter",
            "title": "OSA safeguards letter",
            "sub": "Published 4 August 2025",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "n25",
          "w31-fa-e-swcsaendorse",
          "w31-fa-e-swcsaposition",
          "w31-fa-e-swlettersign",
          "w31-fa-e-swrequest",
          "w31-fa-e-libertyaward",
          "w31-fa-e-libertychallenge"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "fundingselection",
        "title": "Who selects and authorises grants",
        "description": "Named grants establish resources; KR’s statutes establish internal selection and appointment rights. CMA’s two funding charts describe a changed mix without explaining its cause.",
        "boundary": "Ford approval, KR awards and Democracy Fund paid-schedule reports are different money states. Democracy row amounts are withheld here pending visual alignment. Chart percentages are not a dollar budget, cash balance or proof that a donor chose a tactic.",
        "topic": "Resources & divergence",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-villum",
            "title": "VILLUM FONDEN",
            "sub": "Up to two board appointments",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-krboard",
            "title": "KR board",
            "sub": "Distribution and grant decisions",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-kr",
            "title": "KR Foundation",
            "sub": "Dated climate/election grant",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Funding and advocacy are distinct",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ford",
            "title": "Ford Foundation",
            "sub": "Approved general support, 2022",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-democracy",
            "title": "Democracy Fund, Inc.",
            "sub": "Reported paid rows; amounts unresolved",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-mix2024",
            "title": "CMA funding · 2024",
            "sub": "59 / 30 / 11 chart values",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-mix2025",
            "title": "CMA funding · 2025",
            "sub": "82.8% foundation grants",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-krappointments",
          "w31-fa-e-krdistribution",
          "w31-fa-e-kr2023",
          "w31-fa-e-ford2022",
          "w31-fa-e-democracy2024",
          "w31-fa-e-mix2024",
          "w31-fa-e-mix2025",
          "w31-fa-e-democracy2023",
          "w31-fa-e-kr2025",
          "w31-fa-e-krelections"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "cmaasks",
        "title": "Check My Ads: requests and responses",
        "description": "CMA asks for creator/advertiser checks, platform review before monetization and sanctions. Its crisis revenue/refund proposal has an explicit regulator response: specific monetization practices were not recommended.",
        "boundary": "These checks concern monetized creators and advertisers, not every viewer. The disposition of other recommendations is unresolved in the accepted source wave; no enacted universal ID, actual ban, refund or automated decision is inferred.",
        "topic": "Requests & dispositions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Funding and advocacy are distinct",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-cmasub",
            "title": "CMA response · 2025",
            "sub": "Listed December; submission day unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-crisis-money",
            "title": "Crisis revenue / refunds",
            "sub": "Specific practices not recommended",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
            "title": "Creator / advertiser checks",
            "sub": "Proposal; not universal viewer ID",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-premonetization",
            "title": "Pre-monetization review",
            "sub": "Platform assessment before clearance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-sanctions",
            "title": "Bans and clawbacks",
            "sub": "Requested; implementation unverified",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-cmapublish",
          "w31-fa-e-cmasubmission",
          "w31-fa-e-checks",
          "w31-fa-e-clearance",
          "w31-fa-e-sanctionrequest",
          "w31-fa-e-crisismoney",
          "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
          "w31-fa-e-remainingforecast"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ffasks",
        "title": "Full Fact: requested access and official responses",
        "description": "Full Fact seeks broader crisis scope, meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers and stronger supervision. Ofcom retains a narrower formal channel and declines central coordination and routine submission of every analysis.",
        "boundary": "Full Fact acknowledges Ofcom cannot mandate fact-checker partnerships. Class-level protocol decisions are not rejection of every data-access request, nor a new right for Full Fact to direct a platform.",
        "topic": "Requests & dispositions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-fullfact",
            "title": "Full Fact",
            "sub": "Respondent seeking scope and access",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffsub",
            "title": "Full Fact response",
            "sub": "Dated 17 October 2025",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffscope",
            "title": "Broader crisis scope",
            "sub": "Request, with safeguards",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffaccess",
            "title": "Fact-checker data access",
            "sub": "Requested role; not a granted right",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffoversight",
            "title": "Stronger supervision",
            "sub": "Requested records and coordination",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-ffpublish",
          "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
          "w31-fa-e-ffscope",
          "w31-fa-e-ffaccess",
          "w31-fa-e-ffoversight",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "noticeinputs",
        "title": "How Full Fact’s input changed a notice indicator",
        "description": "Ofcom attributes the notice-indicator amendment to Full Fact’s response and questions at an earlier DSIT meeting. Its FOI answer separately reports initial planning and a May 2026 approval window.",
        "boundary": "The response is dated October 2025; the meeting was in August. No Full Fact attendance or initiation is inferred. Record existence and an approval window do not reveal the underlying minute, draft edits or approver’s terms.",
        "topic": "Requests & dispositions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-ffsub",
            "title": "Full Fact response",
            "sub": "Dated 17 October 2025",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-noticechange",
            "title": "Notice indicator amendment",
            "sub": "Ofcom attributes two input routes",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
            "title": "Ofcom / DSIT meeting",
            "sub": "4 August 2025; minute outside this wave",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-planning",
            "title": "Initial planning record",
            "sub": "Existence and chronology confirmed",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-approval",
            "title": "Approval window",
            "sub": "21–26 May 2026, agency reported",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-ffinput",
          "w31-fa-e-meetinginput",
          "w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation",
          "w31-fa-e-ofcommeeting",
          "w31-fa-e-planningreported",
          "w31-fa-e-approvalreported",
          "w31-fa-e-ffsubmission",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ministerial",
        "title": "Ministers, Ofcom and crisis notices",
        "description": "Section 175 gives the Secretary a direction route through Ofcom. A notice can require a public statement and information. The provider’s criteria-based crisis determination remains a separate decision.",
        "boundary": "This enacted-text source is not a fresh consolidated-law/commencement audit. No particular notice or provider response is shown. It does not establish a direct power to order removal of any specified lawful post.",
        "topic": "Authority & records",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-secretary",
            "title": "Secretary of State",
            "sub": "Section 175 statutory role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-notice",
            "title": "Public statement notice",
            "sub": "Explanation and information route",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-providers",
            "title": "In-scope providers",
            "sub": "Determine crisis using criteria",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-ministernotice",
          "w31-fa-e-ofcomnotice",
          "w31-fa-e-publicaccount",
          "w31-fa-e-information",
          "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
          "w31-fa-e-ministerliteracy",
          "w31-fa-e-reasonspublish",
          "w31-fa-e-directionrevoke",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "providerrecords",
        "title": "Who acts on a crisis—and who records it",
        "description": "Signals inform the provider, which determines activation and assembles its team. Large services have a specific police-channel recommendation. Providers retain analyses; Ofcom can seek them.",
        "boundary": "The channel does not replace legal data-request processes. Existing appeals, accuracy, privacy and expression safeguards remain. A 90-day protocol/analysis clock is not a promise to restore removed posts or accounts.",
        "topic": "Authority & records",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-indicators",
            "title": "External / internal signals",
            "sub": "Inputs; no automatic trigger",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-providers",
            "title": "In-scope providers",
            "sub": "Determine crisis using criteria",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-safeguards",
            "title": "Existing safeguards",
            "sub": "Appeals, expression and privacy",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-team",
            "title": "Provider crisis team",
            "sub": "Senior cross-functional responsibility",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-lechannel",
            "title": "Police crisis channel",
            "sub": "Large-service scope; existing law applies",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-analysis",
            "title": "Analysis and retained records",
            "sub": "Ofcom can ask; not all routinely public",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-inputs",
          "w31-fa-e-providerdecision",
          "w31-fa-e-teamselection",
          "w31-fa-e-channeloperation",
          "w31-fa-e-analysisrecords",
          "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest",
          "w31-fa-e-retainappeals",
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-recommendprovider",
          "w31-fa-e-information",
          "w31-fa-e-policechannel",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "codestatus",
        "title": "From published code to legal effect",
        "description": "The crisis statement was published in June and children-code amendments were laid. Their source record does not resolve final crisis commencement. September’s NCII announcement supplies a different measure’s date.",
        "boundary": "The draft’s analysis clock is not a restoration guarantee. September 30 belongs to the NCII measure, not crisis rules. StopNCII is a recommended option with alternatives; no sole-supplier purchase requirement is established. Public partnership terms are in the earlier access reader; this measure does not prove execution.",
        "topic": "Authority & records",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "ofcom",
            "title": "Ofcom",
            "sub": "Selects measures within its remit",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-protocol",
            "title": "Crisis protocol",
            "sub": "Decision published; commencement unresolved",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-childdraft",
            "title": "Children-code draft",
            "sub": "Submitted 12 June; laid 18 June 2026",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-analysis",
            "title": "Analysis and retained records",
            "sub": "Ofcom can ask; not all routinely public",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-nciimeasure",
            "title": "Separate NCII measure",
            "sub": "30 September 2026 date; not crisis",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w28-access-stopncii",
            "title": "StopNCII",
            "sub": "Recommended option; alternatives allowed",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w28-access-swgfl",
            "title": "SWGfL",
            "sub": "Expertise; public terms separately retained",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w31-fa-e-protocoladoption",
          "w31-fa-e-laidchild",
          "w31-fa-e-draftanalysistime",
          "w31-fa-e-nciidate",
          "w31-fa-e-nciirecommend",
          "w31-fa-e-swgflexpertise",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral",
          "w31-fa-e-analysisrequest"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "creative",
        "title": "From evidence to police and advertiser decisions",
        "description": "Operation Creative separates rightsholder referrals, police assessment and distribution to advertising recipients. Operators can challenge action; police removal has a stated evidential condition.",
        "boundary": "The embedded police guidance is dated 2019, released in 2021. A request to disrupt services is not a court order. Removal from a list does not prove downstream advertising restoration.",
        "topic": "Advertising lists",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-creative-referrers",
            "title": "Rightsholder referrers",
            "sub": "Evidence enters police review",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-pipcu",
            "title": "PIPCU police unit",
            "sub": "Police assessment and list review",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwl",
            "title": "Infringing Website List",
            "sub": "Police list; not a universal ban",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-ad-recipients",
            "title": "Advertising recipients",
            "sub": "Apply their own terms and choices",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-site-operators",
            "title": "Website operators",
            "sub": "Notice and challenge role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-creative-head",
            "title": "Creative Head of Unit",
            "sub": "Chooses Creative tactics case by case",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-creative",
            "title": "Operation Creative",
            "sub": "Dated procedure; portal design separate",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-prs",
            "title": "PRS for Music",
            "sub": "138 referrals reported; period unspecified",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-creative-evidence",
          "w30-class-e-creative-screen",
          "w30-class-e-creative-tactics",
          "w30-class-e-creative-notice",
          "w30-class-e-creative-challenge",
          "w30-class-e-creative-removal",
          "w30-class-e-prs-referrals",
          "w30-class-e-iwl-distribution"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "distribution",
        "title": "International sharing of advertising warnings",
        "description": "WIPO ALERT carries national assessments to approved advertising users. Contributors retain responsibilities and access choices; users choose which lists to use. Review begins in the relevant national process.",
        "boundary": "PIPCU is cited as a precedent, not a proved operational feed. Cross-list deletion notification is not automatic worldwide removal or advertising restoration.",
        "topic": "Advertising lists",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-contributors",
            "title": "National contributors",
            "sub": "National process and list control",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo-alert",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT",
            "sub": "Advertising distribution only",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-alert-users",
            "title": "Authorized advertising users",
            "sub": "Choose permitted lists",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-whitebullet",
            "title": "White Bullet",
            "sub": "Official lists and proprietary scoring",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-site-operators",
            "title": "Website operators",
            "sub": "Notice and challenge role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo",
            "title": "WIPO",
            "sub": "Administers access and distribution",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwl",
            "title": "Infringing Website List",
            "sub": "Police list; not a universal ban",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-wipo-precedent",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-host",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-classification",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-user-approval",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-contributor-permission",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-user-selection",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-purpose",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-national-review",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-cross-list-notification",
          "w30-class-e-wb-wipo-use"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "commercial",
        "title": "Classifications, licences and business decisions",
        "description": "White Bullet describes an official-list index and a separate proprietary risk index. Peer39 markets an exclusion offering. Gambling Commission duties give a distinct contractual route for licensees.",
        "boundary": "Vendor descriptions and announcements do not prove a customer activated the service. LCCP contractual requirements are not a mandate to treat every IWL entry as a universal prohibition.",
        "topic": "Advertising lists",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gpi",
            "title": "Official-list index",
            "sub": "Official findings combined",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-whitebullet",
            "title": "White Bullet",
            "sub": "Official lists and proprietary scoring",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-ipi",
            "title": "Proprietary risk index",
            "sub": "Vendor assessment, not judgment",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-peer39",
            "title": "Peer39",
            "sub": "Markets exclusion; activation unverified",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gambling-commission",
            "title": "Gambling Commission",
            "sub": "Licence duties; IWL guidance",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gambling-condition",
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1 condition",
            "sub": "Contract terms and reasonable steps",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-gambling-licensees",
            "title": "Gambling licensees",
            "sub": "Specified licence scope, not all advertisers",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwl",
            "title": "Infringing Website List",
            "sub": "Police list; not a universal ban",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-gambling-regulation",
          "w30-class-e-gambling-contract-right",
          "w30-class-e-gambling-iwl",
          "w30-class-e-wb-official-index",
          "w30-class-e-wb-proprietary-index",
          "w30-class-e-wb-peer-plan",
          "w30-class-e-peer-offering"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "matching",
        "title": "How merchant records affect payment access",
        "description": "Acquirers report qualifying terminations; authorized users must inquire. Mastercard permits admission of a listed merchant, while Stripe publishes a more restrictive practice with exceptions. Correction is a distinct route.",
        "boundary": "August 2026 public network rules are not backdated to earlier disputes. Inquiry, response, early removal and five-year purge have different clocks. No automatic admission or restoration is shown.",
        "topic": "Payment restrictions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "mc-acquirers",
            "title": "Mastercard acquirers",
            "sub": "Report, inquire, decide and correct",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-match",
            "title": "MATCH Pro",
            "sub": "Inquiry is mandatory; exclusion is not",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-match-users",
            "title": "Authorized MATCH users",
            "sub": "Access is approved; inquiry required",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-stripe-acceptance",
            "title": "Stripe acceptance practice",
            "sub": "General exclusion, with exceptions",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-merchants",
            "title": "Merchants & owners",
            "sub": "Applicable remedy routes",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "mastercard",
            "title": "Mastercard",
            "sub": "Network standards and limited remedies",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "stripe",
            "title": "Stripe",
            "sub": "Publishes a separate acceptance policy",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-mc-investigation",
          "w30-class-e-mc-product-cessation",
          "w30-class-e-mc-termination-match",
          "w30-class-e-mc-enforcement",
          "w30-class-e-match-access",
          "w30-class-e-match-entry",
          "w30-class-e-match-inquiry",
          "w30-class-e-match-admission",
          "w30-class-e-match-accuracy",
          "w30-class-e-match-retroactive",
          "w30-class-e-match-purge",
          "w30-class-e-match-correction",
          "w30-class-e-match-personal-rights",
          "w30-class-e-stripe-policy",
          "w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "alertpay",
        "title": "How notices reach payment companies",
        "description": "The proposed process carries authorized claims through WIPO formalities to payment providers. WIPO reports a manual pilot; its programme separately plans deployment.",
        "boundary": "Pilot: 17 actions, 35 sites; 71% went offline OR removed infringing goods. These are reported composite site outcomes, not account-closure counts. Named development partners are not proved to be the two unnamed pilot providers. ER2.3 is a broader budget, not a Pay allocation.",
        "topic": "Payment restrictions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-pay-rightsholders",
            "title": "Authorized rightsholders",
            "sub": "Claimants in the proposed workflow",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-pay",
            "title": "WIPO ALERT-PAY",
            "sub": "Design and pilot, separate from ALERT",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-payment-providers",
            "title": "Payment providers",
            "sub": "Own-policy decisions; pilot firms unnamed",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-pay-pilot",
            "title": "Manual pilot",
            "sub": "71% composite outcome, reported",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo",
            "title": "WIPO",
            "sub": "Administers access and distribution",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo-programme",
            "title": "Approved 2026/27 programme",
            "sub": "Planned Pay deployment within broad work",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-wipo-er23",
            "title": "Broader ER2.3 budget",
            "sub": "Not an ALERT-PAY allocation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-pay-hosting",
          "w30-class-e-pay-first-notice",
          "w30-class-e-pay-provider-discretion",
          "w30-class-e-pay-pilot-outcome",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-priority",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-er-budget",
          "w30-class-e-wipo-er-spend"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "courts",
        "title": "Court challenges and the limits of restoration",
        "description": "eGumball sought emergency delisting relief. The 2023 appeal reversed that provisional relief; the 2025 appeal rejected anti-SLAPP protection at its first step. FilmOn supplied an expressly applied legal framework.",
        "boundary": "The rulings do not establish merchant liability, actual delisting or new processing access. The May 2025 modifying order corrects an inverted sentence without changing judgment. Current MATCH rules are a separate source period.",
        "topic": "Payment restrictions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball",
            "title": "eGumball, Inc.",
            "sub": "Challenges listing; restoration unproved",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball-superior",
            "title": "Superior Court",
            "sub": "Provisional 2021 removal-request order",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-merrick",
            "title": "Merrick Bank Corporation",
            "sub": "Historical termination and listing role",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-match",
            "title": "MATCH Pro",
            "sub": "Inquiry is mandatory; exclusion is not",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-appeal-fourth",
            "title": "Court of Appeal",
            "sub": "Separate 2023 and 2025 procedural rulings",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball2023",
            "title": "2023 TRO appeal",
            "sub": "Emergency relief reversed; merits open",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-egumball2025",
            "title": "2025 anti-SLAPP appeal",
            "sub": "Procedural ruling; no restoration",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-filmon-opinion",
            "title": "FilmOn precedent · 2019",
            "sub": "Legal precedent, not shared data",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-merrick-match",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-challenge",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-tro",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-tro-reversal",
          "w30-class-e-merrick-slapp",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-version",
          "w30-class-e-egumball-public-brief",
          "w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "inquiry",
        "title": "Political pressure and three different responses",
        "description": "Adalytics research and CMA’s claimed advocacy precede the February 2025 requests to DV, MRC and TAG. TAG reports no investigated BSC violations; DV disputes interpretation and reports additional safeguards.",
        "boundary": "The letters are requests, not subpoenas. CMA’s claimed contribution is not proof it drafted them. TAG’s determination is its own reported result, not independent exoneration; no MRC revocation is proved.",
        "topic": "Standards pressure",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-adalytics",
            "title": "Adalytics",
            "sub": "Research source; later named defendant",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
            "title": "February 2025 inquiry",
            "sub": "Requests, not mandatory orders",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv",
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand",
            "sub": "Brand/product role; legal entities separate",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-tag",
            "title": "TAG",
            "sub": "Certification body; reports its review",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Claims advocacy; receives legal demand",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-mrc",
            "title": "Media Rating Council",
            "sub": "Audit and revocation questions received",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-tag-response",
            "title": "TAG reported finding",
            "sub": "No BSC violations, TAG reports",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-adalytics-early-access",
          "w30-class-e-cma-contribution",
          "w30-class-e-senate-dv-requests",
          "w30-class-e-senate-mrc-pressure",
          "w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure",
          "w30-class-e-dv-critical-response",
          "w30-class-e-tag-determination",
          "w30-class-e-dv-rebuttal-april"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "inputs",
        "title": "How outside reports become vendor policy",
        "description": "DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.",
        "boundary": "Incoming reports differ from outbound notices; the exact files used by DV remain unknown. Neither a public-data source nor the over-£25,000 contribution band establishes approval rights. Planned integration and later reported implementation are distinct.",
        "topic": "Standards pressure",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w28-access-ncmec",
            "title": "NCMEC",
            "sub": "Public aggregates, distinct meanings",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
            "title": "DV-selected public input",
            "sub": "Exact files and versions unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-hi-category",
            "title": "Highly Illicit category",
            "sub": "DV policy and additional judgment",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-platforms",
            "title": "Platform partners",
            "sub": "Distribution ≠ activated implementation",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv",
            "title": "DoubleVerify brand",
            "sub": "Brand/product role; legal entities separate",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "iwf",
            "title": "Internet Watch Foundation",
            "sub": "URL assessment and membership resources",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-iwf-url",
            "title": "IWF assessed URL List",
            "sub": "Specialist input, distinct from fees",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
            "title": "Outbound notice tables",
            "sub": "Not a domain guilt list",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category",
          "w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category",
          "w30-class-e-dv-category-distribution",
          "w30-class-e-dv-adoption",
          "w30-class-e-ncmec-publishes-outbound",
          "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-origin",
          "w30-class-e-dv-ncmec-transformation",
          "w30-class-e-dv-input-category",
          "w30-class-e-iwf-maintenance",
          "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-planned",
          "w30-class-e-iwf-dv-testimonial",
          "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-membership",
          "w30-class-e-dv-iwf-band"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "returnpaths",
        "title": "Preservation requests and legal counterpressure",
        "description": "DV Holdings’ counsel issued a preservation demand, and CMA publicly objected. The later complaint names both DV legal entities as plaintiffs and Adalytics as defendant; it separately alleges coordination with CMA.",
        "boundary": "A preservation demand is not a court order or immediate production requirement. Objection is not proof of compliance or chilling. Requested damages and corrective advertising are not granted relief, and CMA is not the named defendant.",
        "topic": "Standards pressure",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-holdings",
            "title": "DoubleVerify Holdings",
            "sub": "Issuer and named plaintiff",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-preservation-letter",
            "title": "Preservation demand",
            "sub": "Request to CMA; not a court order",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-cma",
            "title": "Check My Ads",
            "sub": "Claims advocacy; receives legal demand",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-bondi",
            "title": "Bradley Bondi",
            "sub": "Signed counsel; no fee data acquired",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-inc",
            "title": "DoubleVerify Inc.",
            "sub": "Historical litigant and named plaintiff",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-dv-complaint",
            "title": "Filed complaint",
            "sub": "Adalytics is named defendant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-adalytics",
            "title": "Adalytics",
            "sub": "Research source; later named defendant",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-paul-hastings",
            "title": "Paul Hastings",
            "sub": "Firm named on demand and complaint",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w30-class-e-bondi-representation",
          "w30-class-e-firm-representation",
          "w30-class-e-dv-preservation",
          "w30-class-e-preservation-recipient",
          "w30-class-e-cma-objection",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-holdings",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-plaintiff-dv-inc",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-defendant",
          "w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "research",
        "title": "Who financed the policy research",
        "description": "All five disclosed co-funders connect to the same corrected March 2021 report. Publication, authored recommendations and MPA’s later parliamentary citation remain distinct routes.",
        "boundary": "No grant amount, contract, editorial veto or donor instruction was acquired. The report says validation workshops excluded funders; that is a reported method. MPA quotes the executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation 4.",
        "topic": "Earlier research",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-ipo",
            "title": "Intellectual Property Office",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-alliance",
            "title": "Alliance for IP",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w1-icmec-mpa",
            "title": "Motion Picture Association",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-industry-trust",
            "title": "Industry Trust",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              4,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-premier-league",
            "title": "Premier League",
            "sub": "Amount and approval rights unknown",
            "pos": [
              5,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-rusi",
            "title": "RUSI",
            "sub": "Publisher of corrected report",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
            "title": "Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime",
            "sub": "March 2021 corrected report",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-rusi-recommendations",
            "title": "Research recommendations",
            "sub": "Recommendations 4, 14 and 15",
            "pos": [
              5,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w29-enf-mpa-evidence2022",
            "title": "MPA parliamentary evidence",
            "sub": "Internal date · 10 May 2022",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-publication",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-ipo",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-alliance",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-mpa",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-industry-trust",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-funder-premier-league",
          "w29-enf-e-rusi-recommendations",
          "w29-enf-e-mpa-rusi-citation"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "gdi-awards",
        "title": "Oak’s grants to GDI and rights organisations",
        "description": "Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.",
        "boundary": "Awards are not bank receipts or annual spending. The UK operator and German research participant remain separate roles; common branding does not establish corporate ownership.",
        "topic": "Grant resources & selection",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "oak",
            "title": "Oak Foundation",
            "sub": "Reported awards; cash unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "USD 903,614 · core capacity",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
            "title": "Liberty",
            "sub": "USD 783,133 · human-rights work",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-org",
            "title": "Open Rights Group",
            "sub": "USD 437,349 · migration / data",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-pi",
            "title": "Privacy International",
            "sub": "USD 1,138,554 · privacy safeguards",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-oakgdi",
          "w32-gdi-e-oakliberty",
          "w32-gdi-e-oakorg",
          "w32-gdi-e-oakpi"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "peer-selection",
        "title": "Who chooses Digital Freedom Fund projects",
        "description": "DFF describes staged 2025 selection rounds, March 2026 board adoption and peer selection of the June round. Staff and the published terms support that process.",
        "boundary": "These are attributed governance accounts. No original board resolution, complete recusal rules, named Liberty vote, grant signatory or payment is acquired. The March 2025 complaint predates the June 2026 grant.",
        "topic": "Grant resources & selection",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-dffboard",
            "title": "DFF board",
            "sub": "March 2026 process adoption",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-peerprocess",
            "title": "DFF selection process",
            "sub": "Staged pilot; later adoption",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-peer",
            "title": "DFF Peer Group",
            "sub": "Reported project selection",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-dffstaff",
            "title": "DFF staff",
            "sub": "Information and facilitation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-peerterms",
            "title": "Peer Terms of Reference",
            "sub": "Conflict and confidentiality commitments",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-dffround",
            "title": "June 2026 grant round",
            "sub": "Attributed peer selection; no payment proof",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-boardadoption",
          "w32-gdi-e-peerselection",
          "w32-gdi-e-staffsupport",
          "w32-gdi-e-terms",
          "w32-gdi-e-juneselection"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "public-funding",
        "title": "GDI: public grants and EU research funding",
        "description": "FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.",
        "boundary": "The FCDO invoice is not an additional transfer above its aggregates. Programme totals are not recipient income; the German contribution is not a UK-company payment. No ownership or common-grant bridge is drawn.",
        "topic": "Grant resources & selection",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-fcdo",
            "title": "FCDO",
            "sub": "Dated aggregate funding account",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-cdmd",
            "title": "CDMD programme",
            "sub": "Programme envelope ≠ recipient income",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "european-commission",
            "title": "European Commission",
            "sub": "Specified authority; no inferred case outcome",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
            "title": "AI4TRUST",
            "sub": "EU-funded research project",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdide",
            "title": "GDI gUG · Germany",
            "sub": "Named EU research participant",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2019",
          "w32-gdi-e-fcdo2022",
          "w32-gdi-e-ledger",
          "w32-gdi-e-programmepartnership",
          "w32-gdi-e-ecproject",
          "w32-gdi-e-ecgerman"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "methodology",
        "title": "From research terms to classification decisions",
        "description": "GDI contributed existing keyword resources; FBK edited D2.1 and recorded internal coordinator review. The document’s sampling and methodological choices are inspectable.",
        "boundary": "Coordinator accepted / Ready for submission is an internal designation, not Commission acceptance. Keywords select material for research; they do not establish truth, illegality or deployed enforcement.",
        "topic": "Research inputs & evaluation",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-d21",
            "title": "D2.1 methodology",
            "sub": "Internal acceptance ≠ EC acceptance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-fbk",
            "title": "Fondazione Bruno Kessler",
            "sub": "Project coordinator / editor",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ucamreview",
            "title": "UCAM review role",
            "sub": "D2.1 quality assurance",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-seeds",
            "title": "Retrieval seeds",
            "sub": "Sampling inputs, not truth verdicts",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-framing",
            "title": "Methodological frame",
            "sub": "Explicitly adopted analytical approach",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution",
          "w32-gdi-e-d21editor",
          "w32-gdi-e-qualityreview",
          "w32-gdi-e-sampling",
          "w32-gdi-e-framing"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "component-results",
        "title": "Test scores versus real-world results",
        "description": "AI4TRUST reports a final warning system, a textual component, a human-validation dashboard and user evaluation. Each finding belongs to its stated component and test.",
        "boundary": "A textual weighted F1 near 56% is not aggregate system accuracy. Reported users and annotations do not establish production deployment, automatic sanctions or independent replication.",
        "topic": "Research inputs & evaluation",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ai4trust",
            "title": "AI4TRUST",
            "sub": "EU-funded research project",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-warning",
            "title": "Warning system",
            "sub": "Reported final ensemble",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-textsignals",
            "title": "Textual component",
            "sub": "About 56% weighted F1; component only",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-validation",
            "title": "Human-validation dashboard",
            "sub": "Reported tool; not automatic action",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-evaluation",
            "title": "User evaluation",
            "sub": "206 users / three rounds reported",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-warningmethod",
          "w32-gdi-e-componentmetric",
          "w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation",
          "w32-gdi-e-userevaluation"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "advertising-exits",
        "title": "GDI’s advertising relationships—and their endings",
        "description": "The historical Oracle segment and IAS input connect GDI ratings to buyer choices. Both named intermediaries later announced exits from the relevant service or input.",
        "boundary": "Service announcements are not observed cache deletion or publisher restoration. Buyer configuration and actual revenue effects remain not obtained; these are historical channels, not proof of current use.",
        "topic": "Distribution, exits & review",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-segment",
            "title": "Oracle GDI segment",
            "sub": "Selectable ratings input",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-oracle",
            "title": "Oracle",
            "sub": "Historical segment; service exit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-iasproduct",
            "title": "IAS Context Control",
            "sub": "Customer category / risk choices",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-buyers",
            "title": "Advertising buyers",
            "sub": "Choose targeting / exclusions",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ias",
            "title": "Integral Ad Science",
            "sub": "Announced input discontinuation",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-ratingsupply",
          "w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages",
          "w32-gdi-e-buyerchoice",
          "w32-gdi-e-oracleend",
          "w32-gdi-e-iashistorical",
          "w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues",
          "w32-gdi-e-iaschoices"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "review-routes",
        "title": "How an advertising classification can be challenged",
        "description": "GDI describes publisher rating appeals and reassessment. Its UK operator’s policy separately offers qualified consideration of concerns about research outputs.",
        "boundary": "Neither process supplies an recipient-correction instruction, successful appeal or duty for buyers to resume advertising. Privacy deletion is not the same as withdrawing a rating.",
        "topic": "Distribution, exits & review",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-publishers",
            "title": "Affected publishers",
            "sub": "Described appeal standing",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
            "title": "GDI rating review",
            "sub": "Described reassessment; outcome unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdi",
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index",
            "sub": "Named operation; UK/German roles differ",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
            "title": "Disinformation Index Ltd",
            "sub": "UK website operator / controller",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-researchcomplaints",
            "title": "Research representations",
            "sub": "Qualified review, not restoration",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-appealstanding",
          "w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision",
          "w32-gdi-e-researchreview",
          "w32-gdi-e-researchlimits"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "procedural-return",
        "title": "Apple, Liberty and a partly private court case",
        "description": "Liberty and Privacy International filed a separate complaint and submitted arguments. The tribunal denied concealment of basic Apple case details while keeping the March hearing private.",
        "boundary": "This is a procedural decision, not a TCN merits ruling, a universal open-hearing right or an advertising remedy. The later identified DFF grant cannot be assumed to have initiated the earlier filing.",
        "topic": "Distribution, exits & review",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w31-fa-liberty",
            "title": "Liberty",
            "sub": "Core award; separate procedural action",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-complaint",
            "title": "Liberty / PI complaint",
            "sub": "Filed 13 March 2025",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-pi",
            "title": "Privacy International",
            "sub": "Privacy and surveillance safeguards",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-ipt",
            "title": "Investigatory Powers Tribunal",
            "sub": "Decides procedural applications",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-secrecyapplication",
            "title": "Basic case details",
            "sub": "Application to withhold",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w32-gdi-hearing",
            "title": "March hearing",
            "sub": "Remained private",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled",
          "w32-gdi-e-pifiled",
          "w32-gdi-e-applicationdenied",
          "w32-gdi-e-privatehearing"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "access-gates",
        "title": "Who can access platform data",
        "description": "The provider-establishment DSC decides project vetting and request conditions. The researcher supplies eligibility and funding information; providers have a bounded amendment route.",
        "boundary": "This selected Article 40(4) path is separate from public-data access under 40(12) and notice priority under Article 22. An 80-working-day request/refusal clock is not a delivery promise. No GDI application is matched here.",
        "topic": "Researcher access decisions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w33-con-homedsc",
            "title": "Researcher-home DSC",
            "sub": "Initial assessment; not final decision",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-estdsc",
            "title": "Provider-establishment DSC",
            "sub": "Final project vetting / request",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-request",
            "title": "Reasoned access request",
            "sub": "Scope, conditions and time period",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-vetted",
            "title": "Vetted researchers",
            "sub": "Project-specific eligibility",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-providers",
            "title": "VLOP / VLOSE providers",
            "sub": "Article 40 data-provider role",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-homeassessment",
          "w33-con-e-vetting",
          "w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure",
          "w33-con-e-modalities",
          "w33-con-e-provide",
          "w33-con-e-amend"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ali-oversight",
        "title": "Who pays and who supervises AliExpress’s trustee",
        "description": "AliExpress must fund the trustee; the Commission approved Ankura and controls its mandate. QA and monitoring reports should travel back through specified channels.",
        "boundary": "Appointment is acquired; mandate, fee payments and actual monitoring reports are not. The trustee may recommend and report, but cannot make product, business or technical decisions. These commitments concern Article 40(12).",
        "topic": "Researcher access decisions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "european-commission",
            "title": "European Commission",
            "sub": "Specified authority; no inferred case outcome",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-ankura",
            "title": "Ankura Europe",
            "sub": "Approved trustee; no business veto",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-ali",
            "title": "AliExpress",
            "sub": "Examined service; duties ≠ performance",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-qa",
            "title": "AliExpress access QA",
            "sub": "Tests / semiannual metrics required",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-approveankura",
          "w33-con-e-nominatepay",
          "w33-con-e-mandate",
          "w33-con-e-monitor",
          "w33-con-e-qareport",
          "w33-con-e-trustreport"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "audit-and-tracker",
        "title": "A positive audit and no approved requests",
        "description": "FTI’s 2024/25 audit concluded positively on readiness, reported zero approvals and found the inspected applications incomplete or invalid. A later voluntary tracker provides a separate, unmatched account.",
        "boundary": "The two groups are not linked by identity or time. Tracker 70-headline / 68-table and 61-homepage / 60-table public counts remain unresolved. Complete registration is not legal validity; accepted is not delivered.",
        "topic": "Researcher access decisions",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w33-con-fti",
            "title": "FTI Consulting LLP",
            "sub": "Named 2024/25 auditor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-ftiaudit",
            "title": "FTI audit opinion",
            "sub": "Positive readiness; not delivery",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-appcohort",
            "title": "2024/25 applications",
            "sub": "Zero approvals; count redacted",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-collab",
            "title": "DSA40 Collaboratory",
            "sub": "Application support / voluntary reports",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-tracker",
            "title": "Application tracker",
            "sub": "70 headline / 68 table; not census",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-aliopen",
            "title": "One AliExpress entry",
            "sub": "Open; identity and date unknown",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-ftiopinion",
          "w33-con-e-noapprovals",
          "w33-con-e-runs",
          "w33-con-e-alientry"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "evaluation-gate",
        "title": "Who commissioned the £656,000 evaluation",
        "description": "The released CDDP material identifies Oliver Wyman and a £656,000 ex-VAT price. Payment depends on satisfactory deliverables; a later phase has an intended Treasury approval gate.",
        "boundary": "Price is not payment. Actual reports, acceptance certificate, paid invoice and exercised Treasury decision are not obtained. The released schedule has date inconsistencies and empty signature fields.",
        "topic": "Assurance versus results",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w16-supp-dcms",
            "title": "DCMS",
            "sub": "Buyer / programme role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-oliver",
            "title": "Oliver Wyman",
            "sub": "Inventory-identified evaluator",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-evalcontract",
            "title": "CDDP evaluation 102384",
            "sub": "£656,000 ex VAT price; not payment",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-evaloutput",
            "title": "Evaluation / acceptance",
            "sub": "Commissioned; outputs not obtained",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-fundgate",
            "title": "Phase continuation",
            "sub": "Approval specified; decision unknown",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-treasury",
            "title": "HM Treasury",
            "sub": "Intended later-phase funding gate",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-owcommission",
          "w33-con-e-satisfaction",
          "w33-con-e-evalscope",
          "w33-con-e-gatecondition",
          "w33-con-e-treasurygate"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "osdi-assurance",
        "title": "From safety prototypes to reused evaluation methods",
        "description": "DCMS appointed PA for OSDI assurance. PUBLIC reports prototype testing and later credits OSDI practices in a separate STCF evaluation. A dated expert group supplied advice.",
        "boundary": "PA’s report is not acquired. PUBLIC’s TRL4/testing account is not production acceptance, nor proof it was the redacted CDDP subcontractor. Poppy Wood’s advisory role is not procurement veto power.",
        "topic": "Assurance versus results",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w16-supp-dcms",
            "title": "DCMS",
            "sub": "Buyer / programme role",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "pa-consulting",
            "title": "PA Consulting",
            "sub": "External programme assurance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-osdi",
            "title": "OSDI",
            "sub": "Separate online-safety data initiative",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-public",
            "title": "PUBLIC",
            "sub": "Supplier / programme brand",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-sandbox",
            "title": "PUBLIC sandbox",
            "sub": "Reported TRL4 prototype / testing",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-stcf",
            "title": "STCF Round 2",
            "sub": "Separate 2024 evaluation",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w33-con-expertgroup",
            "title": "OSDI expert group",
            "sub": "Dated advice; no procurement veto",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w12-gov-wood",
            "title": "Poppy Wood",
            "sub": "July 2021 Reset Tech advisory role",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w33-con-e-paevaluate",
          "w33-con-e-jointscope",
          "w33-con-e-publicosdi",
          "w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery",
          "w33-con-e-methodreuse",
          "w33-con-e-advises",
          "w33-con-e-woodgroup"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "overview-risk",
        "title": "AI foundations & creators",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "fli",
            "title": "Future of Life Institute",
            "sub": "EIN 47-1052538. Grantmaking, research and advocacy; affiliated asset transfers must not be added to persuasion spending. Named co-signatory of the June 2025 AI moratorium opposition letter.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "vitalik",
            "title": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "sub": "2021 SHIB support confirmed. Total gift or liquidation value not established; FLI says gift unconditional and no decision role.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "lightcone",
            "title": "Lightcone Foundation",
            "sub": "Nevada charity EIN 92-0636259. Not Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong or other similarly named entities.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "tegmark",
            "title": "Max Erik Tegmark",
            "sub": "FLI founder/chair in current September 2026 biography; overlapping 2024 Lightcone governance.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "cais",
            "title": "Center for AI Safety",
            "sub": "CAIS EIN 88-1751310. Separate from its Action Fund.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "FLI and CAIS board bridge. Former DeepMind investor-director.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "goodventures",
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "sub": "Historical CAIS award inventory ends with October 2023 exit grant. Not established current sponsor.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "frame",
            "title": "Frame Fellowship",
            "sub": "Shared creator training and placement infrastructure; independent and amplifier tracks.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "talos",
            "title": "Talos Network",
            "sub": "Membership and donor disclosure; gifts not earmarked to Eva Behrens on the retrieved record.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e42",
          "e43",
          "e44",
          "e45",
          "e48",
          "e49",
          "e54",
          "e55",
          "e65",
          "e76",
          "e117",
          "e63a",
          "e63b",
          "e63c",
          "e63d",
          "w2-fli-e-lightcone25"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "overview-industry",
        "title": "Industry & electoral advocacy",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "ltf",
            "title": "Leading the Future",
            "sub": "FEC C00916114; $75,788,224.10 receipts through June 30, 2026.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "a16z",
            "title": "a16z Capital Management",
            "sub": "Two filed $25m contributions to LTF.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "gregbrockman",
            "title": "Greg Brockman",
            "sub": "$12.5m individual contribution; not an OpenAI corporate payment.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "annabrockman",
            "title": "Anna Brockman",
            "sub": "$12.5m individual contribution.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Announced restricted support for Public First Action.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "publicfirst",
            "title": "Public First Action",
            "sub": "Separate from People First Marketing; Anthropic election-spending restriction.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "buildai",
            "title": "Build American AI",
            "sub": "LTF affiliation and creator intermediary relationship reported by WIRED; no donor-to-creator allocation traced.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sm4",
            "title": "SM4",
            "sub": "Reported creator-pitch intermediary.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e144",
          "e145",
          "e146",
          "e148",
          "e149",
          "e150"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "overview-rights",
        "title": "Digital-rights policy & funders",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "5rights",
            "title": "5Rights",
            "sub": "UK foundation advocating child-centred digital regulation. Donor records and a US lobbying contract are documented. Online-safety advocacy organisation founded by Beeban Kidron; California code sponsor.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "omidyar",
            "title": "Omidyar Network",
            "sub": "Omidyar Network Fund Inc; charitable grants are not eBay corporate payments.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "oak",
            "title": "Oak Foundation",
            "sub": "Common funder of 5Rights and WeProtect. Awards alone do not establish direction over recipient campaigns.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "kidron",
            "title": "Beeban Kidron",
            "sub": "Founder of 5Rights and sponsor of the ControlAI-backed July 2026 amendment. Shared participation does not earmark 5Rights grants to ControlAI. ControlAI-listed supporter and Lords Amendment 84 sponsor. Other investigation maps her 5Rights role. 5Rights founder and listed sponsor of the 2026 AI emergency-shutdown amendment.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "capitol-connection",
            "title": "Capitol Connection",
            "sub": "capconn LLC. Paid contractor to 5Rights for California AB2273 lobbying.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ab2273",
            "title": "California AB2273",
            "sub": "2022 Age-Appropriate Design Code campaign. Current enforcement and litigation are outside this investigation.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rothschild-foundation",
            "title": "Rothschild Foundation",
            "sub": "Specific UK charity 1138145; not a proxy for every institution with this name.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "prudence",
            "title": "Prudence Trust",
            "sub": "Published multiyear core-work award to 5Rights.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e0",
          "e1",
          "e153",
          "e154",
          "e155",
          "e157",
          "e158",
          "e160",
          "e162",
          "e163",
          "w7-adv-e-chair"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "overview-control",
        "title": "ControlAI & political access",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "UK campaign traded by Secure Future Research. Existing major donors and grant conditions remain unresolved. AI advocacy organisation named in Hansard as the origin of emergency-shutdown proposals.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miotti",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti",
            "sub": "ControlAI founder/CEO; UK director and voting/appointment rights.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "behrens",
            "title": "Eva Behrens",
            "sub": "ControlAI Special Projects Lead; UK director and voting/appointment rights.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "conjecture",
            "title": "Conjecture",
            "sub": "2022 venture-backed alignment startup. Leahy described operational ending in March 2026, not corporate dissolution.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "winga",
            "title": "Max Winga",
            "sub": "ControlAI Creator Outreach & Systems Lead; Frame past mentor.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sfr",
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd",
            "sub": "UK 15088415, limited by guarantee without share capital. Two named legal controllers; no exact 50/50 split inferred.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "fabians",
            "title": "Fabian Society",
            "sub": "Named current/former leadership overlaps. No Society-to-ControlAI funding, commissioning or direction established.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sobel",
            "title": "Alex Sobel",
            "sub": "MP, historical Fabian executive; ControlAI-backed legislative activity.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "casir",
            "title": "CASIR · draft",
            "sub": "Unincorporated, unfinished proposed fund. Its site claims affiliations without reciprocal confirmation; no verified donor commitment or executed grant.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e83",
          "e84",
          "e85",
          "e86",
          "e88",
          "e89",
          "e96",
          "e97",
          "e130",
          "e137",
          "e174"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "overview-safety",
        "title": "Content & payment campaigns",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "ncose",
            "title": "NCOSE",
            "sub": "National Center on Sexual Exploitation; public co-signatory linking two distinct campaigns.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ai-moratorium-letter",
            "title": "June 2025 AI moratorium letter",
            "sub": "Shared letter/artifact. This map represents only selected signatories, not the full set of more than 140. A letter is not a directing organisation.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "collective-shout",
            "title": "Collective Shout",
            "sub": "Australian campaigning organisation. Old corpus claim of Basic Religious Charity exemption was contradicted; no donor secrecy inference retained.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "tankard-reist",
            "title": "Melinda Tankard Reist",
            "sub": "Collective Shout Movement Director; payment-letter signatory and trial stakeholder adviser.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rouse",
            "title": "Jon Rouse",
            "sub": "Payment-letter signatory and chair of the completed Australian trial's stakeholder advisory board.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-campaign",
            "title": "July 2025 payment campaign",
            "sub": "Open letter requested payment companies stop processing for targeted game platforms.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "payment-processors",
            "title": "Payment-letter addressees",
            "sub": "Collection: PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership. Letter recipients, not a single legal entity or operational controller.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "itch-io",
            "title": "itch.io",
            "sub": "Platform attributed processor scrutiny and adult-content deindexing to Collective Shout's campaign; private processor correspondence was not obtained.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e4",
          "e5",
          "e6",
          "e7",
          "e8",
          "e9",
          "e11",
          "e13"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "overview-state",
        "title": "Regulators, alliances & trials",
        "description": "Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.",
        "boundary": "Dates and relationship details are shown below the diagram. A historical connection is not necessarily a current one.",
        "topic": "The main branches",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "weprotect",
            "title": "WeProtect",
            "sub": "International alliance with government, industry and NGO board participation. UK and Dutch entities/accounts require careful separation. Participated in WEF digital-safety principles working group; separate from WEF.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "home-office",
            "title": "UK Home Office",
            "sub": "Government records historical funding and a permanent WeProtect board seat.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "european-commission",
            "title": "European Commission",
            "sub": "WeProtect board representation; proposal briefing and possible assistance requests recorded in July 2022 minutes.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "wef",
            "title": "World Economic Forum",
            "sub": "Browne republication and NTI event links here; online-safety institutional links mapped separately. Convened Global Coalition for Digital Safety and related principles work. Digital Trust is a different WEF programme.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "esafety",
            "title": "Australian eSafety",
            "sub": "Regulator with formal international policy relationships; age-assurance trial board is a different body.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "inman-grant",
            "title": "Julie Inman Grant",
            "sub": "eSafety Commissioner; WeProtect board and WEF coalition involvement recorded in 2023–24 official report.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "au-age-trial",
            "title": "Australian age-assurance trial",
            "sub": "Government-commissioned, contractor-run 2024–25 study; final report published 31 August 2025. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "trial-board",
            "title": "Trial stakeholder advisory board",
            "sub": "Contractor trial stakeholder board; not a statutory regulator. Live roster does not establish an ongoing 2026 mandate. New March–July minutes document objections and responses. April minutes clarify panel recruitment; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved.",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "avpa",
            "title": "Age Verification Providers Association",
            "sub": "Age-verification industry association. Its technical evidence is expressly credited in Ofcom’s January 2025 acceptance of email-based estimation; older Australian trial participation remains separately recorded.",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "e18",
          "e30",
          "e31",
          "e32",
          "e166",
          "e167",
          "e168",
          "e169",
          "e183",
          "n33",
          "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
          "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "questions": [
      {
        "id": "w1-icmec-lead-1",
        "question": "Which funds, staff allocations and approvals supported ICMEC age-assurance drafting and advocacy in 2024–2026?",
        "why": "Unrestricted programme work vs earmarked drafting support vs commercially specified deliverable",
        "evidence": "Age-assurance project ledger, grant schedules, time allocations and approval record,2024–26",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements 2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ICMEC-2024-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB1043 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/ab-1043-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC APFC roundtables",
            "url": "https://www.icmec.org/apfc-roundtables/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC international impact report2024",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-Impact-Report-2024.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-icmec-lead-2",
        "question": "What does the identified MPA memorandum identified in April21,2026 analysis; amendment instructions and submissions establish?",
        "why": "Who proposed surviving/deleted provisions and how approval occurred",
        "evidence": "MPA memorandum identified in April21,2026 analysis; amendment instructions and submissions",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB1856 Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection analysis",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-04/ab-1856-wicks-apcp-analysis.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-icmec-lead-3",
        "question": "What does the identified Deployed OS age-API admission terms and implementation specification establish?",
        "why": "Neutral statutory signal service vs discretionary admission control",
        "evidence": "Deployed OS age-API admission terms and implementation specification",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Device-Based Age Assurance technical whitepaper",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Digital-Age-Assurance-Act-Technical-Whitepaper-FINAL-Feb-07-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Microsoft Windows age-signals documentation",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/develop/security/age-signals/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-controlai-j-us-creditor",
        "question": "Who was owed Control AI US's $20,955 related-party balance at 31 December 2025, and what instrument created it?",
        "why": "Resolve the substantive gap after the bounded public-record pass.",
        "evidence": "2025 inter-organisation balance confirmation, accounts-payable ledger entry, supporting invoice/cost-allocation agreement or loan schedule; subsequent clearing entry",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-controlai-j-uk-deferred",
        "question": "What components and conditions comprise the UK7596691 combined line?",
        "why": "Resolve the substantive gap after the bounded public-record pass.",
        "evidence": "Year-end accrual/deferred-income reconciliation, restricted-grant schedules, underlying agreements and full approved accounts",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd 2025 filleted unaudited micro-entity accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1&format=xhtml"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-controlai-j-uk-exercise",
        "question": "Who actually approved and delegated cross-entity spending or creator mandates, and were there external approval rights?",
        "why": "Resolve the substantive gap after the bounded public-record pass.",
        "evidence": "Article27 decision minutes plus Article8 delegation/budget authorization, relevant grant/service agreement",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Secure Future Research Ltd filed Articles of Association",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQxNDkzMjc4OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Control AI US Inc initial 2025 Form 990-EZ, IRS public XML",
            "url": "https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/990/xml/2026/2026_TEOS_XML_06A.zip"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-payments-lead-itch-original-chain",
        "question": "What instruction, account routing and choice produced itch's July 2025 payment restrictions?",
        "why": "Public post attributes the constraint to Stripe's banking partners; the actual instruction, exact merchant arrangement and implementation discussion are absent.",
        "evidence": "Identified July 2025 communication (medium unknown); referenced bank instruction; normally generated account/acquirer onboarding and change records; applicable executed terms.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "itch-io",
          "stripe",
          "stripe-bank-reference"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained itch.io reindexing post, new ancestry pointer",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5149036/reindexing-adult-nsfw-content"
          },
          {
            "title": "Contemporaneous reproduction of itch's Stripe bank-restrictions account",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/itch-io-to-reindex-free-adult-content-as-they-search-for-new-payment-processors/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-payments-lead-steam-original-chain",
        "question": "What did Mastercard, the unnamed processors and acquiring banks actually tell Valve?",
        "why": "Valve's direct-recipient-published account identifies the rule and rejected alternative; Mastercard's statement leaves message scope unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Identified Valve press replies; asserted processor notice and Valve response; asserted network/acquirer communications.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "steam",
          "mastercard",
          "w1-payments-steam-processors"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Valve gets pressured by payment processors: recipient-published Valve reply",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/valve-gets-pressured-by-payment-processors-with-a-new-rule-for-game-devs-and-various-adult-games-removed/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard statement article: recipient-published Valve response",
            "url": "https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/08/mastercard-release-a-statement-about-game-stores-payment-processors-and-adult-content/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-payments-lead-historical-policy",
        "question": "What Stripe policy and account terms governed itch in July 2025?",
        "why": "Archive index gives exact snapshots; current terms and bank lists cannot establish historical applicability.",
        "evidence": "Identified archived public policy; normally generated accepted account terms and notices.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "stripe",
          "itch-io"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Wayback CDX metadata for Stripe restricted-businesses July 2025 captures",
            "url": "https://web.archive.org/cdx/search/cdx?url=stripe.com%2Flegal%2Frestricted-businesses&output=json&filter=statuscode%3A200&from=20250701&to=20250802&fl=timestamp%2Coriginal%2Cdigest"
          },
          {
            "title": "Identified pre-event Stripe restricted-businesses archive capture",
            "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250721113801/https://stripe.com/legal/restricted-businesses"
          },
          {
            "title": "Current Stripe Services Agreement, background only",
            "url": "https://stripe.com/legal/ssa"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-payments-lead-itch-id-selection",
        "question": "Did itch's July 2025 provider exploration yield a selected provider or deployed workflow?",
        "why": "A separately sourced proposal links geographic compliance to possible ID infrastructure, but identifies no provider or implemented relationship.",
        "evidence": "Conditional selection/contract/deployment records, or a later public status update.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "itch-io",
          "w1-payments-itch-digital-id-exploration"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Our update on the UK Online Safety Act",
            "url": "https://itch.io/t/5133739/our-update-on-the-uk-online-safety-act"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w2-fli-holder-1",
        "question": "What does the 11April2022 founding deed and current statutes/amendments forCHE-450.633.132 establish?",
        "why": "Founder identity; appointment/removal; distribution voting; purpose change; dissolution destination",
        "evidence": "11April2022 founding deed and current statutes/amendments forCHE-450.633.132",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI current finance page",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI German lobby-register entry R000227",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R000227"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geneva free public registry access guidance",
            "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-donnees-libre-acces"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geneva physical dossier consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-dossier-physique-entreprise"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w2-fli-holder-2",
        "question": "What does the Signed Europe2022–25 standalone statements with investment and related-party schedules; December30,2022 transfer acceptance establish?",
        "why": "Independent reserve, centrally appointable reserve, legally restricted assets and actual financial movements",
        "evidence": "Signed Europe2022–25 standalone statements with investment and related-party schedules; December30,2022 transfer acceptance",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FLI 2025 audited financial statements",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/ff/31/796351/Future-of-Life-Institute-2025-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI 2022 Form990",
            "url": "https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss founding notice reproduced by Moneyhouse",
            "url": "https://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/company/future-of-life-institute-europe-15209401511"
          },
          {
            "title": "Swiss Gazette supervision notice HR02-1005510667",
            "url": "https://shab.lixt.ch/pdf/2022/7/1/9075c285-a959-4cf0-af6f-3626d4f095bd.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI current finance page",
            "url": "https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/"
          },
          {
            "title": "FLI German lobby-register entry R000227",
            "url": "https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R000227"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geneva free public registry access guidance",
            "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-donnees-libre-acces"
          },
          {
            "title": "Geneva physical dossier consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ge.ch/consulter-registre-du-commerce-commander-documents/consulter-dossier-physique-entreprise"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-creator-j-sabine",
        "question": "What does the Original offer email/thread including sender domain, attachments, fee, proposed wording/references and disclosure terms establish?",
        "why": "Separate publicly stated operating model from contractual conditions and exercised rights.",
        "evidence": "Original offer email/thread including sender domain, attachments, fee, proposed wording/references and disclosure terms",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Supplied Sabine transcript",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-creator-j-mateus",
        "question": "What does the Executed grant letter(s), milestones/reporting/renewal conditions, award amount and recipient entity, payment receipt, any draft/revision exchange for Mky0HtSNE4M establish?",
        "why": "Separate publicly stated operating model from contractual conditions and exercised rights.",
        "evidence": "Executed grant letter(s), milestones/reporting/renewal conditions, award amount and recipient entity, payment receipt, any draft/revision exchange for Mky0HtSNE4M",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Future Tense: The Dark Philosophy Driving AI Development",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky0HtSNE4M"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-creator-j-frame",
        "question": "What does the Lead-funder grant agreements and acceptance, selection rubric/committee record, executed independent or amplifier placement agreement and legal grantor identity establish?",
        "why": "Separate publicly stated operating model from contractual conditions and exercised rights.",
        "evidence": "Lead-funder grant agreements and acceptance, selection rubric/committee record, executed independent or amplifier placement agreement and legal grantor identity",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Frame Fellowship public homepage and output links",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Frame public FAQ content, shipped script index-CUMxxB1e.js",
            "url": "https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-creator-j-pf",
        "question": "What does the A creator-accepted Protect What Is Human SOW plus applicable dated terms, brief, revisions/approval, invoice/settlement and live post establish?",
        "why": "Separate publicly stated operating model from contractual conditions and exercised rights.",
        "evidence": "A creator-accepted Protect What Is Human SOW plus applicable dated terms, brief, revisions/approval, invoice/settlement and live post",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People First Influencer Terms of Use",
            "url": "https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Protect What Is Human creator recruitment",
            "url": "https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-creator-j-rational",
        "question": "What does the Executed commissioning agreement and accepted brief for0bnxF9YfyFI, exact UK/US legal counterparty, revision approvals and invoice/payment establish?",
        "why": "Separate publicly stated operating model from contractual conditions and exercised rights.",
        "evidence": "Executed commissioning agreement and accepted brief for0bnxF9YfyFI, exact UK/US legal counterparty, revision approvals and invoice/payment",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rational Animations: What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?",
            "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI publication announcing Rational Animations collaboration",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-australia-lead-revision-record",
        "question": "Which objections changed the approved protocol and what was actually implemented?",
        "why": "Minutes and final response table identify action; inconsistent document controls prevent clean revision chronology.",
        "evidence": "Identified follow-up email and control-register versions; normally generated approval and fieldwork records.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "au-age-trial",
          "trial-board",
          "w1-australia-protocol-revisions",
          "w1-australia-scout-insights"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "March 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/SAB-Minutes-13-March-2025-FINAL-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "D-2.9 Evaluation Proposal, dated February 6, 2025",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/D-2.9-Evaluation-Proposal-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "A-1.3.1 Human Test Subjects Protocol, V1.3 filename",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/A-1.3.1-Human-Test-Subjects-Protocol-V1.3.docx"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-australia-lead-recusal-operation",
        "question": "How did the stakeholder-engagement-only role restriction apply to Corby's stated intention to review technical/vendor report sections, and what work was actually performed?",
        "why": "A declared exclusion and later review commitment identify a boundary; neither proves compliance nor breach.",
        "evidence": "Identified conflict declaration; normally generated task assignments, review permissions, signoffs and conflict/recusal minutes.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "corby",
          "au-age-trial",
          "w1-australia-trial-draft-review"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Retained trial conflict register",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/conflict-of-interest-register/"
          },
          {
            "title": "July 8, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SAB-Minutes-8-July-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-australia-lead-regulator-mou",
        "question": "What boundaries did the eSafety MOU impose and what regulator comments altered the report?",
        "why": "Agreement and draft input are identified, but their operative content is absent.",
        "evidence": "Identified signed MOU, mid-project impartiality report and draft-feedback communication.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "esafety",
          "au-age-trial",
          "w1-australia-esafety-mou"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "April 29, 2025 Stakeholder Advisory Board minutes",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/SAB-Minutes-29-April-2025_removed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final Part B: statutory stakeholder liaison",
            "url": "https://ageassurance.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AATT_Part_B_DIGITAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w1-australia-lead-procurement",
        "question": "What were the exact contract, tax basis, variations and subcontracted amounts?",
        "why": "Original departmental brief confirms value; full contract/register inspection and payment reconciliation remain incomplete.",
        "evidence": "Identified CN4111198 and GST-labelled register; normally generated contract, variations, invoices and subcontracts.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "au-infrastructure",
          "accs"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Official departmental briefing confirming trial procurement value",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi26-145-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI26-176 indexed GST-labelled contract register",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-26-176_documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Original AusTender CN4111198 entry",
            "url": "https://www.tenders.gov.au/Cn/Show/77f527297b2c4c218e5f99476707aa98"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "reserve-5rights",
        "question": "Which records document the2022 5Rights–capconn terms and policy-output route?",
        "why": "Answered only for the narrowed route; remaining financial/approval questions are explicit successors.",
        "evidence": "Grant allocations, dated instructions, work-product approvals and invoices",
        "status": "answered",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": "Original FARA materials, dated Kidron letters and California text uptake establish the bounded terms/output route. Exact grant-pool allocation, instructions, draft approvals, remittances and invoices remain not obtained."
      },
      {
        "id": "reserve-weprotect",
        "question": "Which disclosures identify WeProtect grant/budget rights and the policy-input route?",
        "why": "Answered only for the narrowed route; remaining financial/approval questions are explicit successors.",
        "evidence": "Approval minutes, grant restrictions and correspondence",
        "status": "answered",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": "Institutional grant/budget-right disclosures and credited/commissioned policy inputs establish the scoped resource/committee route. Signed project conditions, approval minutes, allocated expenditure and actual instruction remain not obtained."
      },
      {
        "id": "reserve-cais",
        "question": "How does the $5.2m estate resolution reconcile to the $5,259,802 reserve and its later disappearance?",
        "why": "Retain a previously identified discriminating record outside the completed bounded wave.",
        "evidence": "Settlement instrument, ledger settlement and audit reconciliation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "reserve-uk-status",
        "question": "What parliamentary action followed the planned 8 September 2026 Sobel introduction?",
        "why": "Retain a previously identified discriminating record outside the completed bounded wave.",
        "evidence": "Hansard, Votes and Proceedings, bill version and stage",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "reserve-opposing",
        "question": "Which named opposing-committee/vendor expenditure route was acquired?",
        "why": "Answered only for the narrowed route; remaining financial/approval questions are explicit successors.",
        "evidence": "Disbursements, invoices, contracts and intercommittee reconciliation",
        "status": "answered",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": "One Think Big/Lantern Production Consultants March2026 route is acquired. Creative output, subvendors, invoices, approvals and complete committee purchase coverage remain not obtained."
      },
      {
        "id": "reserve-fabian",
        "question": "Did a Fabian institution commission or approve a specific relevant policy intervention?",
        "why": "Retain a previously identified discriminating record outside the completed bounded wave.",
        "evidence": "Dated commission, minutes or formal submission; roster overlap is insufficient",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "closed-au-responses",
        "question": "Did the public record contain responses to trial objections?",
        "why": "Closes the missing-minute and unanswered-objection public-route question while preserving narrower implementation gaps.",
        "evidence": "",
        "status": "answered",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": "Yes. Acquired March–July minutes and final methodology account record objections, responses and changed procedures; implementation and operative review boundaries remain unresolved."
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-oak-l-oak-letters",
        "question": "Who approved the named5 Rights and WeProtect awards, and what rights did the signed letters reserve?",
        "why": "Generic process does not identify Alan Parker or prove recipient-specific termination/reporting/editorial rights.",
        "evidence": "Signed 2023 5 Rights and 2025 WeProtect grant letters, concept notes, approval/renewal record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-oak-l-subgrant",
        "question": "What budget deviations were actually approved or refused under the Dutch-to-UK agreement?",
        "why": "Disclosure establishes formal ability, not exercised control of a named output.",
        "evidence": "Executed 2021 subgrant agreement, annual schedules, amendment approvals and underspend adjustments",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-oak-l-swiss",
        "question": "Which legal entity and hosted fund is Swiss Philanthropy in the430 k Safe Futures instrument?",
        "why": "A rerouting is explicit; its upstream funding source and exact legal vehicle are not.",
        "evidence": "2023 Together for Girls grant amendment and 2024-27 direct grant letter plus fund identifier",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-oak-l-review-edits",
        "question": "Which contributor changes were accepted, and who had final publication approval?",
        "why": "Named Oak contribution is stronger than adjacency; no individual edit or veto evidence supplied.",
        "evidence": "Commissioning SOW, tracked drafts, feedback disposition and final signoff for 2024 review",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-oak-l-survey-sow",
        "question": "Who paid and approved the specific 2023 European survey and associated advocacy products?",
        "why": "Commissioning and use are explicit; earmarked funding and exercise of manuscript rights remain unproved.",
        "evidence": "2023 survey SOW,invoices,funding cost code,questionnaire amendments and manuscript approvals",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-opp-lead-lantern-invoices",
        "question": "Which workers, subvendors and placements produced the seven March anti-Bores expenditures, and what did Think Big approve?",
        "why": "Distinguishes an arms-length general contractor from an integrated payment conduit, and a filed generic service purpose from an exact commissioned output.",
        "evidence": "Executed March 2026 services contract/SOW, vendor invoices keyed to SE.4218-SE.4224 excluding SE.4217, subvendor ledger, placement orders and creative approval trail",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Think Big April monthly amendment, March 2026",
            "url": "https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/585/202605209870101585/202605209870101585.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CLC and Sophia Gonsalves-Brown complaint, American Mission and Think Big",
            "url": "https://campaignlegal.org/sites/default/files/2026-05/AISubvendorComplaintFinal%20%281%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FEC Advisory Opinion 1983-25",
            "url": "https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/1983-25/1983-25.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-icmec-l-westpac",
        "question": "What rights accompanied Westpac funding, and did they apply to Lighthouse, SaferAI or age-policy work?",
        "why": "Distinguishes capacity funding from programme-specific approval; resolves three-year website vs six-year report descriptions.",
        "evidence": "Original grant and amendments, programme budget/allocation schedules, reporting and renewal/termination provisions",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2025 update, published April2026",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2025-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia: origins and future outlook",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/about-icmec-australia/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-icmec-l-partners",
        "question": "Which organisations actually participated as unlisted SaferAI partners, and who approved a named output?",
        "why": "The rules establish a permissible unseen category; the records would identify actual participation and decisions.",
        "evidence": "Participation-category register, attendance record, publication clearance and contributor consent for one named policy paper",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SaferAI for Children Coalition terms of reference",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/SaferAI-for-Children-Coalition-Terms-of-Reference_15012026-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-icmec-l-lighthouse",
        "question": "Which contracted data and access rules govern Lighthouse and any resulting bank action?",
        "why": "Separates analytic capacity from identity adjudication or account denial; no sensitive raw records are requested.",
        "evidence": "Provider licence and provenance schedules, user access agreement, retention/correction rules and a de-identified alert-to-action audit trail",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-icmec-l-virginia",
        "question": "What language and instructions followed Senator Craig's December2024 DLS draft request?",
        "why": "An explicit institutional response exists; the exact draft could distinguish agenda influence from provision authorship.",
        "evidence": "Draft request number, resulting bill draft and revisions, author instructions and published later bill counterpart",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "JCOTS 2024 annual report: ICMEC presentation and drafting request",
            "url": "https://dls.virginia.gov/commissions/jcots/materials/2024_annual_report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-5r-lead-1",
        "question": "Who originated and approved the August5 proposed amendments?",
        "why": "Separates a recorded amendment transmission from its authorship and accepted language.",
        "evidence": "CapConn email to Aaron Skaggs August5,2022 with attachment versions; surrounding July18–August11 draft exchanges",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "California State Archives: legislative resources",
            "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/collections/legislative-resources"
          },
          {
            "title": "California State Archives: reference services",
            "url": "https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/services/reference-services"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-5r-lead-2",
        "question": "Was client release or editorial permission exercised on these exact materials?",
        "why": "Distinguishes formal contract rights from exercised release or revision approval.",
        "evidence": "June9–10 background-sheet drafts and replies; June21 coalition-letter transmission/approval chain",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w3-5r-lead-3",
        "question": "Which funding pool and exact remittances paid the contract?",
        "why": "Identifies actual contemporaneous funding and receipt timing without projecting later grants backwards.",
        "evidence": "May–September2022 invoices, 5Rights ledger allocations and bank/remittance reconciliation for five reported ranges",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CapConn Exhibit AB with 5Rights contract and activity/receipt appendices",
            "url": "https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7427-Exhibit-AB-20240627-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-fin-l-au-statements",
        "question": "What do AU component and subsequent standalone statements disclose about restricted grants and operating capacity?",
        "why": "6July2023 component audit explicitly referenced; current accessible standalone attachments not verified",
        "evidence": "After legitimate access-state change, inspect publicly lodged AIS attachments; specifically seek the AU audited component statements/report for period ended6July2023 named by the US audit. No ACNC retry while current admin-policy failure persists.",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w3-icmec-australia"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACNC AIS2024 title/locator only, financial contents unavailable",
            "url": "https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/72001f82-e5d3-eb11-bacc-000d3a6aca25/documents/7af1f05b-5426-f011-8c4d-002248127014"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-fin-l-grant-instruments",
        "question": "Which dates, permitted costs, reporting, renewal and sanction rights govern the AUD25m award?",
        "why": "Technical-capacity grant with recipient discretion versus explicit donor approvals/redirect rights; term change versus stale or differently scoped programme copy",
        "evidence": "Initial executed grant, FY24 extension and any legal-grantee transition instrument; do not infer novation existence merely from deconsolidation.",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w3-icmec-westpac",
          "w3-icmec-australia",
          "icmec"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac2024 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-modern-slavery-statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2024 Safer Children, Safer Communities report",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/wbc-2024-safer-children-safer-communities-report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-fin-l-software-allocation",
        "question": "Which grant or operating funds paid for platform development, licensing and maintenance?",
        "why": "Ordinary expected underlying business records; exact vendor allocations unverified",
        "evidence": "Project ledger, intangible-asset register, executed supplier/maintenance instruments and invoice coding; no attribution of USD20,699 fixed assets to Lighthouse.",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w3-icmec-australia",
          "w3-icmec-lighthouse"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac FY21 Modern Slavery Statement",
            "url": "https://www.cmsservices.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/aw/sustainability/WBC_2021_modern_slavery_statement.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-fin-l-membership-change",
        "question": "Which executed instruments and actual membership entries made the 6 July 2023 Australian control change effective?",
        "why": "Current constitutions and independent US filings establish rules or reported changes but no actual new member names, effective admission/resignation entries or donor reserved-rights instrument. Bounded independent publisher routes have reached a record frontier.",
        "evidence": "Member-register extract with effective dates; admission/resignation and constitutional amendment resolutions; adopted constitution and director appointment instruments effective 6 July 2023; any donor reserved-rights instrument",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "icmec",
          "w3-icmec-australia"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia public publisher media metadata: constitution",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=constitution&per_page=30"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia actual linked governance page",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-australia-governance/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-resolution",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=resolution&per_page=50"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-agm",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=agm&per_page=50"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: media-membership",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=membership&per_page=50"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: pages-agm",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/pages?search=annual%20general&per_page=50"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia public metadata query: posts-agm",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/posts?search=annual%20general&per_page=50"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-lh-lead-feed-governance",
        "question": "What provenance, permitted-use, retention and correction terms governed each Lighthouse feed and recipient access?",
        "why": "Public descriptions identify capabilities and a dated geographic restriction but not feed suppliers or enforceable licence schedules.",
        "evidence": "Versioned feed inventory, supplier licence schedules, recipient access agreements, privacy impact assessment and correction/withdrawal propagation procedure; exclude underlying sensitive data",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
          "w3-icmec-australia",
          "w4-lh-data-suppliers"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Symposium programme, 30 October 2024",
            "url": "https://26980386.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/26980386/ICMEC%20AU%20Symposium%202024%20-%20Program.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia privacy-policy URL: original unavailable on this route",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-lh-lead-alert-action",
        "question": "Can one de-identified institutional audit trail connect a Lighthouse result to a reviewed action or a rejected false match?",
        "why": "Operational metrics do not prove downstream decisions. Documented Huntsman closures must remain a separate operation until a join is recovered.",
        "evidence": "De-identified alert/query-to-decision audit trail, handling protocol, recipient acknowledgement and outcome evaluation",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
          "w4-lh-huntsman"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "No Bank Left Behind, July 2026",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ICMEC-Australia-Insights-Paper-No-Bank-Left-Behind-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AUSTRAC urges financial services to look out for child exploitation transactions",
            "url": "https://www.austrac.gov.au/news-and-media/media-release/austrac-urges-financial-services-look-out-child-exploitation-transactions"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-lh-lead-support-instrument",
        "question": "What do the Lighthouse build and renewed support instruments allocate to ICMEC and Kablamo?",
        "why": "The vendor describes a continuing operating dependency without prices, deliverable acceptance or contract terms.",
        "evidence": "Build statement of work, acceptance record, Product Care agreement/renewals and handover schedule",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w3-icmec-lighthouse",
          "w4-lh-kablamo",
          "w4-lh-product-owner"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Kablamo Lighthouse case study",
            "url": "https://www.kablamo.com.au/case-study/icmec-website-redesign"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-pol-q-drafting",
        "question": "November2024 discussion-paper drafting history, contributor comments and publication clearance — what does the record show?",
        "why": "Who supplied the device-level sentence, who amended it and who approved publication.",
        "evidence": "November2024 discussion-paper drafting history, contributor comments and publication clearance",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-pol-q-sponsor",
        "question": "Paper-specific budget, commissioning agreement and donor conditions if any — what does the record show?",
        "why": "General organisational support versus earmarked influence over this output.",
        "evidence": "Paper-specific budget, commissioning agreement and donor conditions if any",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-pol-q-tas",
        "question": "Woolcott-review research file/source transmittal and response implementation log for section6.3.2 — what does the record show?",
        "why": "Independent literature discovery versus direct coalition submission; later acceptance/implementation of recommendations.",
        "evidence": "Woolcott-review research file/source transmittal and response implementation log for section6.3.2",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-pol-q-esafety",
        "question": "Toolkit footnote34 source-selection and manuscript-review record — what does the record show?",
        "why": "How the2024 paper entered2026 guidance and whether any broader recommendations were accepted.",
        "evidence": "Toolkit footnote34 source-selection and manuscript-review record",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-pol-q-encryption-clearance",
        "question": "Who introduced and cleared the homomorphic-encryption and E2EE-limit wording, and what source was intended for footnote29?",
        "why": "Bibliographic discrepancy plus missing technical support leave paragraph origin unresolved; FOI identifies actual draft and comment channels.",
        "evidence": "Attachment A and B May2025 drafts; final-draft redlines; comment-disposition log; footnote29 reference-manager entry and publication clearance",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          },
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "LSE repository metadata for report126219",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w5-gov-l-component-audit",
        "question": "Who was the Australian component auditor and what did the statements/report through6July2023 disclose?",
        "why": "The US auditor expressly received the record; direct publisher metadata searches did not recover it.",
        "evidence": "Australian component financial statements and independent auditor report for period ended6July2023; audit engagement identity and transmission/cover record supplied to GRF",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia annual impact report2024-25",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Impact_Report_ICMEC_Australia_online.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia publisher media search: audit",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=audit&per_page=30"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia publisher media search: financial",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-json/wp/v2/media?search=financial&per_page=30"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w5-gov-l-specific-approvals",
        "question": "How did Westpac-related funding and downstream programs pass through the board approval and conflict rules?",
        "why": "New charter identifies where approvals should be recorded; current board includes a Westpac executive. Only records of particular decisions can distinguish ordinary expertise from donor instruction or conditioned approvals.",
        "evidence": "Executed grant/extension and relevant board papers/minutes; delegated-authority schedule; interests disclosures, exceptions, recusals and votes; director appointment/representative agreement",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Board Charter, adopted6December2023",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Board-Charter.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Conflict of Interest Policy",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Conflict-of-Interest.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia board page, current capture",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/icmec-board/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w5-enc-l-funding",
        "question": "What award and publication rights governed the Toolbox work package3 report?",
        "why": "Funding route is named but amounts and approval rights are absent; centre-level5Rights funding cannot supply missing grant terms. Award announcement, UKRI collaboration record and actual WP2 output acquired. Next target is the Cambridge/Bristol award and subaward terms, work-package cost schedule and publication/acceptance clauses. Parent centre value is not a project allocation.",
        "evidence": "Fourth Strategic Funding Call award agreement, work-package budget, deliverable and publication terms",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFC REPHRAIN project description",
            "url": "https://www.digital-futures-for-children.net/our-work/rephrain"
          },
          {
            "title": "UKRI Gateway to Research: REPHRAIN, EP/V011189/1",
            "url": "https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP/V011189/1"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN: Launch of Strategic Funding Call 4 Projects",
            "url": "https://www.rephrain.ac.uk/launch-of-strategic-funding-call-4-projects/"
          },
          {
            "title": "REPHRAIN Work Package 2, Project 1: Reliability Analyses",
            "url": "https://rephrain-f77d71.gitlab.io/wp2_p1.html"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w5-enc-l-peerreview",
        "question": "Did eSafety-affiliated peer review alter recommendations in the2024 report or transmit it into toolkit drafting?",
        "why": "Named review participation is real access, but no comments, selection email or redline connects it to toolkit wording.",
        "evidence": "Peer-review invitation, comments, author response and source-selection correspondence",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Guiding principles for addressing technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse",
            "url": "https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126219/3/van_der_Spuy_et_al_2024_Guiding_principles_for_addressing_technology-facilitated_CSEA.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w5-fund-l-allocation",
        "question": "Which project schedule and advisory record connect the 2021 award to the later financial-monitoring study?",
        "why": "A named award, funding acknowledgement and adviser roster exist. Contract schedules and comment dispositions can distinguish resourcing, consultation and editorial power. Public registration is now and explicitly post-analysis. Next target is the executed grant, scope/ethics amendments and CloudResearch engagement defining the approved expansion and cost baseline.",
        "evidence": "Executed award schedule, variations, research output list, advisory terms/minutes and reviewer dispositions",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Westpac 2021 Safer Children, Safer Communities grant recipients",
            "url": "https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/sustainability/our-positions-and-perspectives/safer-children-safer-communities/scsc-2021-grant-recipients/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childlight Searchlight 2025: Study C funding, advisers and recommendations",
            "url": "https://www.childlight.org/uploads/publications/searchlight2025/Childlight_Searchlight_Report_2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Jesuit Social Services 2023 Australian men study",
            "url": "https://cdn.jss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/20105310/Identifying-and-understanding-child-sexual-offending-behaviour-and-attitudes-among-Australian-men_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF registration j7xh2: The nature of online offending against children",
            "url": "https://osf.io/j7xh2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "OSF j7xh2 response revision history",
            "url": "https://api.osf.io/v2/registrations/j7xh2/schema_responses/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Whitten, Salter and Woodlock: study methodology, CrimRxiv release1",
            "url": "https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/un6p337j/release/1"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w6-ref-l-transmission",
        "question": "Which dated comment dispositions or tracked references connect the earlier encryption-policy inputs to the 2026 toolkit?",
        "why": "Actual2022–24 citations and submissions establish earlier consideration. The remaining mechanism is selection and revision of later guidance, including citation29.",
        "evidence": "Comment disposition, tracked draft and reference-manager export",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety end-to-end encryption position statement, October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/End-to-end-encryption-position-statement-oct2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WeProtect Secretariat submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-WeProtect-Global-Alliance.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Rights Watch submission on draft Australian industry standards",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-02/standards-submission-from-Digital-Rights-Watch_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Designing for Safety: Preventing child sexual exploitation and abuse online",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Designing-for-Safety_Preventing-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-online_CSEA-toolkit.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w6-draft-l-may-files",
        "question": "What text and edits did the May 2025 named attachments contain?",
        "why": "Exact filenames now identify the drafts; the email outline cannot establish their words or revision history.",
        "evidence": "OriginalDOCX attachments and any marked-up returns or version history",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w6-draft-l-decision",
        "question": "How did FOI25139 treat the named attachments, and which records were exempted?",
        "why": "Release summary says18partial/4whole exemptions but does not identify those records or distinguish omitted attachments from withholding.",
        "evidence": "FOI25139 decision notice, document schedule, attachment-treatment explanation and any already-released supplementary set",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI25139 LOG118 released correspondence: toolkit consultation",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/LOG_118_Document_Set.pdf?v=1765065600059"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w6-draft-l-csm-disposition",
        "question": "Which October 2025 draft did Common Sense Media review, and what happened to its requested changes?",
        "why": "Public comments name concrete requested edits and later review date; invitation is beyond the earlierFOI request window.",
        "evidence": "October2025 review invitation and attached draft, submission/receipt records, comment-disposition table, redlines and clearance records",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media comments to Australian eSafety on Designing for Safety draft",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/aus-e-safety-comments-common-sense-media-october-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Common Sense Media Public Filings and Letters: October 2025 eSafety comment entry",
            "url": "https://www.commonsensemedia.org/kids-action/public-filings"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure log118: FOI25139 request scope and release summary",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w6-member-l-return-basis",
        "question": "What Australian tax period, control basis and inter-entity ledger support the 2023 Schedule R entries?",
        "why": "Any-time relationship inclusion is compatible with July deconsolidation, but the 100% entry uses a related-tax-year-end rule. The constitution defaults to calendar year unless changed. The type-L amount does not reveal actual service or cash direction.",
        "evidence": "2023 Schedule R supporting workpaper and Australian tax-year selector; any financial-year-change resolution; inter-entity type-L contract, valuation and general-ledger entries; Australian component statements/report through 6 July 2023",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICMEC US 2023 Form 990, signed public disclosure copy",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICMEC_PD_990-2023-signed.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 Instructions for Schedule R (Form 990)",
            "url": "https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sr--2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC consolidated financial statements2023",
            "url": "https://cdn.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICMEC-2023-Consolidated-FS.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, July2023 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICMEC Australia Constitution, March2025 headers",
            "url": "https://icmec.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ICMEC-AU-Constitution-1.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-impl-l-processing-terms",
        "question": "What fields, retention instructions and UK method configuration do Reddit and Persona actually use?",
        "why": "Public customerFAQ identifies the controller and concrete data outputs. Actual processing schedule and rollout configuration would distinguish current promises, regional availability and implemented collection.",
        "evidence": "Executed processing schedule, configured output/retention schema, UK rollout specification and deletion-control evidence",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reddit Help: Why is Reddit asking for my age?",
            "url": "https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/36429514849428-Why-is-Reddit-asking-for-my-age"
          },
          {
            "title": "Persona customer-specific FAQ for Reddit users",
            "url": "https://help.withpersona.com/articles/7F6BaF9h8Fxf0XWkwQscXN/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-impl-l-regulator-decisions",
        "question": "Which specific ICO–Ofcom age-assurance decisions were coordinated around the July 2025 implementation period?",
        "why": "ICO confirms routine meetings, while broad multi-year FOI request was refused. A short, specific action log could reveal a decision link without assuming every meeting concernedReddit.",
        "evidence": "Topic-specific dated agenda/action log or joint decision record, bounded toJune–July 2025",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO response IC-484385-D3Q2,24 March 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/xlvp0oq4/our-response-to-ic-484385-d3q2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO monetary penalty notice to Reddit,23 February 2026",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/hrlmvj14/reddit-mpn-20260223.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-policy-l-email-evidence",
        "question": "Which submitted technical results and independent tests persuaded Ofcom that email-based age estimation can meet each HEAA criterion?",
        "why": "Statement paragraph 3.86 expressly relies on AVPA and VerifyMy evidence. Method acceptance is established, but the performance and provenance of the underlying tests require assessment of the actual records.",
        "evidence": "Complete consultation response, white paper, test dataset protocol, evaluation memorandum and relevant correspondence.",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Age Assurance and Children's Access statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access.pdf?v=397036"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom Part 5 guidance on highly effective age assurance and other duties",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-age-assurance-and-childrens-access/guidance-on-highly-effective-age-assurance-and-other-part-5-duties.pdf?v=388810"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-policy-l-xgroovy-decision",
        "question": "What factual period, representations, legal provider identity and reasoning appear in the confirmation decision issued on 3 September 2026?",
        "why": "The official case update reports final penalties but promises the non-confidential decision later.",
        "evidence": "Non-confidential confirmation decision, including reasoning and penalty assessment.",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom investigation CW/01318/09/25: Xgroovy",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/investigation-into-the-provider-of-xgroovy.coms-compliance-with-the-duty-to-prevent-children-from-encountering-pornographic-content-through-the-use-of-age-assurance"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-adv-l-redlines",
        "question": "Which exact contributor drafts and government clearance records produced Amendment 124 and the accompanying age-assurance package?",
        "why": "Ministerial credit and sponsorship establish a contribution route; versioned drafts would distinguish specific accepted edits, government legal redrafting and broader campaigning.",
        "evidence": "May–July 2023 age-assurance amendment drafts, tracked changes, meeting readouts and policy/legal clearance records",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Lords chamber, 6 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-06/debates/600d4bb5-1775-4688-94c6-c1fcd7b54e27/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "Hansard: Online Safety Bill report stage and Schedule 4 decisions, 10 July 2023",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-07-10/debates/049FB9B5-C87F-4750-8523-63A07315339D/OnlineSafetyBill"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 124, agreed",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/95907"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Bill: Amendment 125, not moved",
            "url": "https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3137/stages/17765/amendments/96131"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-adv-l-project-funding",
        "question": "Were 5Rights' UK age-assurance submissions or parliamentary amendment work supported by earmarked funding or contributor clearance rights?",
        "why": "Existing general funding and personnel records do not allocate money, staff time or approval rights to these specific UK policy products.",
        "evidence": "2023–2025 UK age-assurance project ledger, grant schedules, staff allocations, commission terms and submission approval records",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Part5 pornographic-content guidance consultation response, March 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/272586-consultation-guidance-for-service-providers-publishing-pornographic-content/responses/5rights.pdf?v=404369"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Protecting Children from Harms Online response, 17 July 2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=385679"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary interests register",
            "url": "https://members.parliament.uk/member/4258/registeredinterests"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-adv-l-certification-disposition",
        "question": "Did Ofcom later accept any part of the October 2025 IEEE/ACCS certification recommendation, or retain a provider-responsibility approach?",
        "why": "The submitted recommendation is concrete; its later disposition is not established by this advocacy lane and must not be silently turned into adoption.",
        "evidence": "Additional Safety Measures consultation statement, response-to-comments matrix and underlying age-assurance certification assessment",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "5Rights: Additional Safety Measures response, October 2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/5rights-foundation.pdf?v=409144"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-market-l-sla",
        "question": "What payment, appointment, liability and termination rights does the executed AVID–scheme agreement allocate?",
        "why": "Would identify revenue allocation, indemnity, renewal/termination and actual delegated rights beyond current public rules.",
        "evidence": "Executed AVID/scheme SLA, dated customer agreement and fee schedule",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-market-l-ageaware",
        "question": "Which proposed AgeAware admission, exclusivity and fee rules became signed agreements or operating decisions?",
        "why": "Would convert proposed commercial/admission machinery into actual executed rights, or establish redesign/cessation. Test independent-assessment alternative before alleging self-certification.",
        "evidence": "Final approved AgeAware specification, procurement/exclusivity agreements, grant schedule, assessor appointment and impartiality assessment",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-market-l-iso",
        "question": "Which committee contributions and dispositions shaped the final standard’s relevant requirements?",
        "why": "Public ISO page GET403; official BSI announcement used once. No paid standard acquisition. Cannot claim exact final clauses or votes from biographies.",
        "evidence": "Full normative ISO27566-1 and particular committee dispositions",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w7-adv-l-commission",
        "question": "What did the commissioned AgeAware rights review conclude, and what changed in response?",
        "why": "A participant account names the commissioned review and team. The terms, fee, declared interests, final report, clearance arrangements and response are not yet acquired. Those records can test the review’s independence and practical effects.",
        "evidence": "Terms of reference, signed commission, declarations, final report and response-to-recommendations record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "euCONSENT: Building a Safer Internet, the Journey to AgeAware",
            "url": "https://euconsent.eu/building-a-safer-internet-the-journey-to-ageaware/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-red-l-grant-terms",
        "question": "What conditions accompanied CeSIA's reported two-year Longview recommendation?",
        "why": "Recommendation letter, executed agreement and remittance schedule would identify legal grantor, actual receipts, restrictions and approval/reporting rights. Recommendation is evidenced; execution is not.",
        "evidence": "Recommendation letter; executed grant agreement if any; remittance and restricted-fund schedule",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          },
          {
            "title": "Longview organizational structure",
            "url": "https://www.longview.org/organisational-structure/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-red-l-campaign-spend",
        "question": "Who paid the launch and diplomatic campaign costs, and on what terms?",
        "why": "Named PR work and an explicit diplomatic budget locate likely finance records. Actual campaign cost centres, invoices and approval clauses remain not obtained.",
        "evidence": "Project ledger, purchase orders, vendor contracts, invoices, grant allocations",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA diplomatic sprint proposal",
            "url": "https://manifund.org/projects/from-nobel-signatures-to-binding-red-lines-the-2026-diplomatic-sprint"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-red-l-text-authority",
        "question": "Who could approve or reject final campaign text and partner implementations?",
        "why": "Credits establish contribution, not final sign-off. Version history and partner terms could distinguish joint authorship, editorial control and broad coalition agreement.",
        "evidence": "Draft history, approval correspondence, partner memorandum and signatory text versions",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Call acknowledgements",
            "url": "https://red-lines.ai/acknowledgements"
          },
          {
            "title": "ControlAI: International AI red lines",
            "url": "https://blog.controlai.org/p/red-lines"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-red-l-policy-transmission",
        "question": "Which campaign or subgroup document entered a government drafting process?",
        "why": "A transmitted briefing and tracked recipient edits would test conversion from access to adopted language; parliamentary advocacy and UNESCO hosting alone cannot.",
        "evidence": "Briefing as sent, recipient acknowledgment, tracked policy drafts, response record",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "UNESCO-network International AI Red Lines subgroup",
            "url": "https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/node/338"
          },
          {
            "title": "Lords debate, 29 January 2026",
            "url": "https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-01-29/debates/4be73a9c-a273-4120-8c34-7d13cca24d61/LordsChamber"
          },
          {
            "title": "TFS India AI Impact Summit account",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/indiaaisummit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government of India: New Delhi Declaration",
            "url": "https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2231208&lang=1&reg=3"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-red-l-athens-support",
        "question": "What resources and conditions sat behind the Athens2025 support credits?",
        "why": "Named supporters narrow the record holders. Identity, amount, in-kind services and program approval rights are not disclosed by logos.",
        "evidence": "Sponsorship agreements, event budget, invoices and legal-entity identifiers",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Athens Roundtable 2025 recap",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Athens-Roundtable-2025-Recap-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-red-l-survey-curation",
        "question": "How did the original fifteen priorities become ten survey choices?",
        "why": "The published methodology records this reduction but not the mapping or exact questionnaire. These can reveal consequential merging, exclusions and wording before rankings.",
        "evidence": "Original workshop export, consolidation matrix, survey form and analysis workbook",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Civil society priorities for international AI governance",
            "url": "https://thefuturesociety.org/cso-ai-governance-priorities/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-follow-l-g7-draft",
        "question": "Was CeSIA language accepted, softened or rejected in the French/G7 drafting process?",
        "why": "Published programme and partially overlapping official goals leave the actual transmission unestablished.",
        "evidence": "Dated submission, recipient acknowledgment, annotated draft and response; label award instrument separately",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Sciences Po March2026 event programme",
            "url": "https://www.sciencespo.fr/fr/evenements/les-mardis-de-l-ia-i-from-principles-to-practice-implementing-secure-and-ethical-ai-frameworks-worldwide/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CeSIA Sciences Po conference report",
            "url": "https://cesia.org/documents/8/Conference_Report_-_From_Principles_to_Practice.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 Digital and Technology Ministers declaration",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/declaration-ministerielle-g7-numerique-technologies.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "French G7 priorities",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/G7evian/2026/02/05/conference-de-presse-sur-les-priorites-des-filieres-finances-et-numerique-du-g7-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Macron G7 closing transcript",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2026/06/17/g7-summit-in-evian-day-three"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-follow-l-fathom-bill",
        "question": "What language and implementation powers did Fathom contribute to its advertised California AI-verification bill?",
        "why": "9September2026: SB813 sponsor and historical prospective operator interest acquired. Enrolled framework preserves voluntary use. Enactment, actual designation and commercial compulsion unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Governor action/chapter; GovOps implementing rules/designation; actual insurance/procurement/litigation conditions; Fathom application or decision",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Fathom partnerships",
            "url": "https://fathom.org/partnerships"
          },
          {
            "title": "McNerney announces Fathom-sponsored SB813",
            "url": "https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/mcnerney-introduces-bill-establish-safety-standards-artificial-intelligence-while-fostering"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 Judiciary analysis: prospective sponsor interest",
            "url": "https://sjud.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2025-04/sb-813-mcnerney-sjud-analysis.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 official status",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-follow-l-caif-fund",
        "question": "Who governs the new multi-agent safety fund involving CAIF, ARIA and industry partners?",
        "why": "9September2026: joint consideration and differentiated optional funding conditions read. USD10m ceiling, not receipts. Grantors, shares, conflicts protocol and disbursements unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Joint selection/conflicts and contribution agreements; contracting grantors/shares; executed awards/disbursements",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cooperative AI Foundation: backing and trustees",
            "url": "https://www.cooperativeai.com/foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "DeepMind multi-agent call announcement",
            "url": "https://deepmind.google/blog/investing-in-multi-agent-ai-safety-research/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multi-agent research competition: public call",
            "url": "https://schmidtsciences.smapply.io/prog/scaling_ai_safety_for_a_multi_agent_world/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Call-specific multi-agent fund FAQ",
            "url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LLRZvrKZD9rtKAWjWXPBVZpA5PTpWZatLBkPFT1IuzU/edit?tab=t.0"
          },
          {
            "title": "Schmidt multi-agent research agenda",
            "url": "https://www.schmidtsciences.org/multi-agent-ai/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w8-follow-l-g7-minors",
        "question": "What does the separate2026 G7 minors instrument require, and who supplied its age-assurance language?",
        "why": "9September2026: three distinct G7 instruments read. Assurance endorsed, universal identity/premarket gate not adopted. UNICEF reports input; actual clause uptake and implementation plan unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Implementation plan and country/platform rule; UNICEF submission/receipt and negotiating drafts",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Macron G7 closing transcript",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2026/06/17/g7-summit-in-evian-day-three"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "5Rights calls for premarket certification after G7 outcome",
            "url": "https://5rightsfoundation.com/test-for-g7-leaders-will-be-holding-tech-firms-accountable/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w9-assure-l-practical-certification",
        "question": "Does an insurer, purchaser or court make optional AI verification practically necessary?",
        "why": "Proposed bill preserves optional route; workshop incentives and opposition predict another mechanism, not an exercised gate.",
        "evidence": "Executed terms, qualification schedule or refusal with applicable standard",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SB813 enrolled GovOps framework",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "SB813 final Senate Floor analysis",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ashby2026 verification/incentive workshop report",
            "url": "https://framerusercontent.com/assets/QrSLKhh1Ii8YzWNF9iLLM1hERI.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w9-assure-l-g7-implementation",
        "question": "Which instrument implements G7 assurance commitments and enforces privacy limits?",
        "why": "Joint policy and guidance do not identify actual refusal/override. UNICEF calls a plan agreed but it was not recovered.",
        "evidence": "Published implementation plan, approved rule or platform notice; method, purpose limits and redress",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "G7 ministers Common Set of Principles for minors",
            "url": "https://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/Actualites/2026/g7/principles-safer-and-more-secure-digital-space-for-minors.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 leaders call for safer digital space for minors",
            "url": "https://www.bundesregierung.de/resource/blob/975228/2442068/5fe0677f964699d24cd1c49eabe53784/2026-06-17-leader-s-call-on-a-safer-digital-space-for-minors-data.pdf?download=1"
          },
          {
            "title": "G7 privacy-authorities age-assurance statement",
            "url": "https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/speeches-and-statements/2026/s-d-g7-ageassurance_260626/"
          },
          {
            "title": "UNICEF reports advance G7 evidence contribution",
            "url": "https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/note-correspondents-first-ever-g7-principles-protect-children-online"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w10-duty-l-fuller-drafts",
        "question": "Did selected recipients receive an earlier or materially fuller2026 duty-of-care draft?",
        "why": "Public availability does not settle selective access. The unexamined Butterfield clip is a user lead, not a verified quotation.2025 OPD withholding establishes a separate earlier secrecy dispute, not fuller corporate2026 versions.",
        "evidence": "Dated distribution register, exact attachments/version hashes, confidentiality terms, recipient acknowledgement; exact public clip before assessing its allegation",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Department: public exposure-draft landing page —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-care-bill-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "Minister Wells: My feed, my way —8September2026",
            "url": "https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/my-feed-my-way"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senate outstanding orders: OPD169 duty-of-care preparation records",
            "url": "https://www.aph.gov.au/-/media/02_Parliamentary_Business/22_Chamber_Documents/221_Senate/Notice_Paper/Current_Notice_Paper/OPDs.pdf?hash=B52E85DFEBFCBD8E04405A2A98B1AD30CB3B330B&la=en"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w10-duty-l-delegated-adult-rules",
        "question": "How would enacted rules and provider decisions treat lawful adult choice, adult-AI communication and researcher eligibility?",
        "why": "Exposure draft allocates prospective discretion and limits; future instruments, enactment and concrete implementation not established. No universal ID claim follows.",
        "evidence": "Enacted text/commencement; approved instruments and researcher rules; actual provider decision and review record, with privacy and adult-exception reasons",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021: official compilation11December2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/2024-12-11/2024-12-11/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset.Tech Australia: statutory-review submission70 —2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-70-reset-tech-australia.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w11-fund-l-uk-terms",
        "question": "What control rights did Carnegie programme awards and network succession actually create?",
        "why": "Restricted purpose and named support establish capacity but not clause/publication veto. Carnegie has independent endowment/budget authority; legal Luminate/Reset and network host remain unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Signed grant schedules/reporting/clearance/clawback terms; trustee/programme decisions;2023 transition and fiscal-host/payroll agreement",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2021 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-Report-and-Accounts-2021-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie United Kingdom Trust:2023 accounts",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Annual-report-and-accounts-31-December-2023-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Luminate funding process",
            "url": "https://luminategroup.com/funding-process/en"
          },
          {
            "title": "Carnegie: programme transition to Online Safety Act Network —26October2023",
            "url": "https://carnegieuk.org/blog/online-safety-and-carnegie-uk/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w11-fund-l-alignment",
        "question": "What common reform position did the funded HRLC alignment work produce, and who approved it?",
        "why": "Named Reset-HRLC-DRW partnership is reported by the grantor, Rights-First acknowledges Mannifera support, and HRLC submission155 expressly endorses Reset model. A coalition-wide agreed position, approval rights and allocation of the specific alignment grant remain unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Executed2024 grant/payor and allocation records; coalition-wide agreed text and approval/decision record; attributed transmission of that specific common position",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mannifera: grants to Reset Australia and Human Rights Law Centre",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/about-us/our-partners/improving-quality-public-debate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera membership guide: pooled route and governance",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mannifera_Membership_Guide_web.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Australian Communities Foundation:2023/24 annual report",
            "url": "https://communityfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Annual-Report-2023-24-Aus-Communities-Foundation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mannifera Executive Officer: dedicated disinformation round",
            "url": "https://mannifera.org.au/collaborating-to-tackle-disinformation-and-protect-democracy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w11-fund-l-commission-terms",
        "question": "Did the McKinnon commissions constrain questions, findings or publication?",
        "why": "Named commissions and policy outputs are documented; substantive donor control and final-government-clause adoption are not.",
        "evidence": "2023/24 signed scopes, fees/payment, amendments, IP/publication clearance and acceptance correspondence",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon privacy policy —September2025",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/privacy-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Functioning or Failing? —May2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Reset.Tech-Functioning-or-Failing-Report-V2C.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset: Achieving Digital Platform Public Transparency in Australia —June2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/Digital-platform-public-transparency.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w11-fund-l-isf-reconciliation",
        "question": "How does the2024 annual support figure relate to the phase-two award and payments?",
        "why": "US$219,000 award and US$87,600 annual accrual support may overlap; no reconciliation or bank receipt acquired. Research purpose must remain separate from duty advocacy.",
        "evidence": "Executed award/amendments, award-account schedule, annual accrual-to-disbursement reconciliation and final report",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation: phase-two children privacy project",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/project/designing-defining-a-digital-world-in-childrens-best-interests-phase-2/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Internet Society Foundation:2024 Form990",
            "url": "https://www.isocfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Filed-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-Internet-Society-Foundation.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w12-gov-l-member-register",
        "question": "What current member and rights records reconcile the UK register after theMay2025 transition?",
        "why": "The2023 incorporation already records sole subscriber Scott and old PSC rights. New director-membership rules and Wood notification explain a plausible transition;April2026 change is details-only. No additive ownership mystery or proven current50/50. Public-record branch closed pending a genuinely new record.",
        "evidence": "Current member register, basis for PSC notices, any separate joint-voting/appointment instrument and relevant change record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:7May2025 adoption resolution",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/WUUyWDdNTUhhZGlxemtjeA/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: registered control categories",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: current officer register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/officers"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2023 incorporation and initial PSC",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzM4NTM0MDY3NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Scott PSC04 filedApril2026: details-only change",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzUxNTIxNzkwOGFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official guarantee-company model articles",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-guarantee/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-guarantee"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w12-gov-l-committee-exercise",
        "question": "Did the historical Research Committee approve a Reset commission or its publication?",
        "why": "Accounts establish a general oversight institution, while separate branded records identify commissions. Their link is not established; legal counterparty, members and decision rights remain missing.",
        "evidence": "Research Committee terms, membership/appointment resolution, delegation thresholds and Reset engagement/clearance minutes",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Research Centre:FY2024 report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/abd4222701/fy24_smrc_financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Susan McKinnon Foundation trust:FY2024 financial report",
            "url": "https://a-ap.storyblok.com/f/3001038/x/5e9d8ac075/fy24_smf-financial-report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon Funding and Financials: separate entities",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/about-us/funding-and-financials"
          },
          {
            "title": "McKinnon: two Reset research commissions",
            "url": "https://mckinnon.co/democracy/social-media-mis-disinformation"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w12-gov-l-network-delegation",
        "question": "Which entity and delegation governs the specific funded network output?",
        "why": "Privacy notice establishes shared operating services and constitution defines powers; neither identifies an OSN-specific budget, legal employer or exercised editorial authorization.",
        "evidence": "Operating/transition agreement, budget, employer/service allocation, board delegation and relevant conflict/approval minute",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Network privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.onlinesafetynetwork.uk/data-and-privacy-policy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK: replacement articles filed21May2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ2NjkxNzExM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Tech UK:2024 company accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14982650/filing-history/MzQ4MjM1MzE4MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w13-disp-l-exact-uk-edit",
        "question": "Which specific submitted wording informed April2025 risk-age clarification?",
        "why": "Ofcom credits collective feedback including OSAN; inspected July response does not identify exact accepted minimum-age clause. Amendment credit is earned, exclusive authorship and decisive influence remain open.",
        "evidence": "Response-coding/decision log and drafting comparison for8.171; for search issue, final Register24.10-14 versus predecessor",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSAN children consultation response — July2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/284469-consultation-protecting-children-from-harms-online/responses/online-safety-act-network-2.pdf?v=385913"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom children risk-assessment statement —24 April2025",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/statement-protecting-children-from-harms-online/main-document/volume-3-assessing-the-risks-of-harms-to-children-online.pdf?v=396648"
          },
          {
            "title": "SLSC25th Report: published Ofcom answer —15 May2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldsecleg/123/12303.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom further stakeholder responses —16 December2024",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/illegal-harms/annex-1--further-stakeholder-responses.pdf?v=388774"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w13-disp-l-au-selection-reasons",
        "question": "What reasons and attributed input explain researcher and complaint-safeguard boundaries?",
        "why": "Government supports overarching duty but qualifies/rejects components. Draft university-only direct eligibility is narrower than NGO request; source-specific reason and clause authorship are absent.",
        "evidence": "Recommendation-to-clause instructions, attributed response matrix, university-eligibility decision reasons and future explanatory/data-access rules",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "HRLC submission155 —5 July2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/osar-submission-155-human-rights-law-centre.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rights-First: Principles for Digital Platform Regulation",
            "url": "https://www.hrlc.org.au/app/uploads/2025/04/2410-Principles-for-Digital-Platforms-Regulation-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w14-tax-l-production-authority",
        "question": "Who selected, funded and approved the specific typology definitions?",
        "why": "Co-chair/drafting/foreword participation is evidenced; full credits, budget, commission and approval machinery remain uninspected. Missing finance is not proof of unpaid work.",
        "evidence": "Complete credits/acknowledgments, workstream terms, category-selection drafts/response log and disclosed commissioning or funding instrument",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WEF2023 online-harms typology: scoped original text",
            "url": "https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Typology_of_Online_Harms_2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver participant account of typology —24August2023",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/blog/online-harms-typology/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL biography: John-Orr Hanna publications",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/about/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w14-tax-l-category-instructions",
        "question": "Which source-specific drafting decisions set25C-G categories and addition thresholds?",
        "why": "Official and NGO taxonomy use coexist with prior Australian law and broader Reset comparators. Draft differences do not identify the author, accepted clause or reason for each threshold. FOI count/penalty inconsistencies also need substantive version matching.",
        "evidence": "Category-by-category policy instructions, alternatives/disposition table, clearance and delivered-versus-published substantive version comparison",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Australian review issues paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/online-safety-act-2021-review-issues-paper-26-april-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Reset Digital Platform Regulation Green Paper —April2024",
            "url": "https://au.reset.tech/uploads/Digital-Platform-Regulation-Green-Paper.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act2021 as made: earlier harm tests",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/asmade/2021-07-23/text/original/epub/OEBPS/document_1/document_1.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FOI25-247 departmental briefings and review revision",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/foi-25-247-documents-released.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w15-impl-l-paid-scope",
        "question": "Which executed scope and invoice generated DSIT transaction654609?",
        "why": "Original payment names supplier; report evidence is earlier and no invoice join exists. Contract, instructions and deliverables distinguish actual purchased work from capability.",
        "evidence": "Executed OrderForm/SOW, invoice, processing instructions, acceptance and selection records",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "Resolver standard terms v3.0 —20August2021",
            "url": "https://www.resolver.com/legal/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w15-impl-l-released-report",
        "question": "Where is the partly disclosed Crisp report and a matched referral outcome?",
        "why": "ICO confirms24October2025 partial release and ten June referrals. Underlying report and actual platform responses would test scope and results.",
        "evidence": "Released report, exact report date/version, matched escalation and platform response",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ICO decision IC-374825-D9K4 — 11 November 2025",
            "url": "https://ico.org.uk/media2/ygomwbsa/ic-374825-d9k4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Parliamentary testimony on NSOIT — 14 April 2026",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/17465/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w15-impl-l-adopted-policy",
        "question": "Which final instruction and independent operational audit governed NSOIT delivery?",
        "why": "Detailed public copy is draft with redacted approvals; scrutiny response did not commit to statutory/ISC change. Public testimony only partially corroborates operations.",
        "evidence": "Final policy/version/adoption, DPIA, completed assessment and operational audit",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Disclosed DRAFT NSOIT compliance policy",
            "url": "https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/FOI2024-00576-NSOIT-Copy-compliance-policy_Redacted.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response on NSOIT oversight — October2025",
            "url": "https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmsctech/1397/report.html"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w15-impl-l-phone-implementation",
        "question": "Which elements of recommendation48 will create an actual identification obligation?",
        "why": "Qualified support precedes draft with no express phone-at-opening/preservation/tipoff mechanism located. A decision or instrument would distinguish deferral from implementation.",
        "evidence": "Disposition table, privacy/security assessment, drafting instructions and enacted instrument",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Published updated Online Safety Act statutory review —February2025",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Government response to Online Safety Act review —14 April2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/govt-response-to-the-independent-review-online-safety-act-2021.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Exposure draft: Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill2026 —8September2026",
            "url": "https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/exposure-draft-online-safety-amendment-digital-duty-of-care-bill-2026-september2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w15-impl-l-current-supplier",
        "question": "What exact GSN scope,invoice and transition record explain the documented role andpayment?",
        "why": "Legal identity10433562,27January2026 officialanalysisrole and12September2025 payment nowestablished at their source scopes. Exactappointment,SOW,performancecriteria,transaction719926invoice andCrispsuccession/parallelwork remain unresolved.",
        "evidence": "ExecutedGSNcontract/SOW,invoice719926,performance/acceptancerecord anddatedtransitionorparallel-service arrangements",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Current NSOIT privacy notice",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice/national-security-online-information-team-privacy-notice"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "The Global Strategy Network Ltd10433562: official register",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10433562"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ministerial answer106529: GSN analysis and Faculty platform roles",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-01-19/106529"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT September2025 spending: transaction719926",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a6a1922d500fc17835859ab/dsit-spending-over-25000-sept-2025.csv"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w15-impl-l-older-award",
        "question": "Can an accessible primary103528 award be matched to any payment or report?",
        "why": "Secondary listing supplies a locator only; primary route closed. No total contract/payment equivalence claimed.",
        "evidence": "Accessible primary award and exact supplier registration/scope with invoice reconciliation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ContractsFinder103528 notice — original inaccessible",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/47f6e657-8370-4133-98df-ee2f2194144e"
          },
          {
            "title": "Secondary award listing103528 — discovery fields only",
            "url": "https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2023/W39/807534667"
          },
          {
            "title": "DSIT February2025 spending: transaction654609",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69735cdea1311bdcfa0ed92b/dsit-spending-over-25000-february-2025.csv"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w16-supp-l-acceptance-use",
        "question": "Which evaluation,acceptance andsource-access records show theplatform worked ascommissioned?",
        "why": "Accepted evaluation specification, price, Treasury-facing funding gate and visually redacted acceptance criteria are now read and integrated. Actual evaluation output, correctness/rights results, acceptance certificate, repository handover and exercised replacement remain not obtained.",
        "evidence": "Specific evaluationcommission/output,acceptancecriteria/tests,buyeracceptances,repositoryhandover andexerciseoflicensedthirdpartymaintenance",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDDP development/hosting/maintenance opportunity26087",
            "url": "https://production-cas-ui.crowncommercial.gov.uk/digital-outcomes/opportunities/opportunity-details/project/26087"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w16-supp-l-variation-reconciliation",
        "question": "Which interveningterms reconcile102887 printedtotals andprove execution/payment?",
        "why": "Original135/137 containreal30000difference againstsimpleaddition;otherterms remainuninspected.102548visibleNo2signaturesareuncompleted. Separate contracts/caps do notformcombinedcashspend.",
        "evidence": "Completevariationchain,executedcounterparts,pricing/VATschedules,invoices andacceptances withcontractreferences",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Later Faculty call-off attachment — unverified indexed cover",
            "url": "https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/1439ae7e-0b25-44f2-8280-1a9ed6c10620"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w22-sig-l-correction",
        "question": "Does Lantern retraction reach prior recipients and reverse affected decisions?",
        "why": "Programme appeals/removal/TC notification exist. Accepted static pinned-client review establishes available deletion/opinion/checkpoint recovery paths; Lantern deployment, timely recipient application and decision reversal remain unresolved.",
        "evidence": "Lantern integration obligations and deployed-version evidence; recipient acknowledgements and anonymized case reopening/disposition",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w22-sig-l-agreement",
        "question": "Which executed terms allocate Lantern admission, taxonomy, hosting, financial participation and funding rights?",
        "why": "Role descriptions omit contractual allocation, individual votes and amounts.",
        "evidence": "Executed multiparty agreement/amendments, Official Program Expectations, hosting instrument and programme budget",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2024",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Lantern-Transparency-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern expands to financial institutions worldwide",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-expands-to-financial-institutions-worldwide/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w22-sig-l-financial-assessment",
        "question": "What did the later financial-sector HRIA recommend and what was implemented?",
        "why": "2025 report describes review; public pilot summary is not complete financial HRIA or proof it is member-only.",
        "evidence": "Full financial HRIA, recommendation disposition and actual financial onboarding terms",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern transparency report 2025",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/lantern-transparency-report-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition — Lantern financial pilot results",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/lantern-financial-pilot-results/"
          },
          {
            "title": "BSR — Lantern Human Rights Impact Assessment, November 2023",
            "url": "https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Tech-Coalition-HRIA-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w22-sig-l-customer-execution",
        "question": "How did one customer map scores to Checkstep decisions and execute an appeal?",
        "why": "Webhook capabilities need configuration and execution records to establish consequences.",
        "evidence": "Executed SOW, settings/thresholds, handler implementation and redacted decision/appeal audit",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Standard Integration",
            "url": "https://docs.checkstep.com/standard/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine / Checkstep — GenAI moderation guide, current page",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/the-ultimage-guide-to-genai-moderation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w22-sig-l-training-use",
        "question": "Which data actually entered model development under which accepted terms?",
        "why": "Two permissions differ in opt-out, controller and retention boundaries; neither proves execution.",
        "evidence": "Accepted terms, opt-out/feedback configuration, training lineage and correction/deletion handling",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Checkstep — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://www.checkstep.com/terms-of-service"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/terms"
          },
          {
            "title": "Sightengine — Data Processing Addendum",
            "url": "https://sightengine.com/policies/dpa"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-applied-terms",
        "question": "Which accepted terms, reasons and balances governed one documented Cash App restriction?",
        "why": "Current terms identify powers, not their execution in a historical case or the source of an individual decision.",
        "evidence": "Dated accepted contract, account product, reason notice, source of restriction, appeal and fund-release chronology",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Cash App US Terms — current page updated 26 August 2026",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/tos"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App Acceptable Use Policy — undated current page",
            "url": "https://cash.app/us/en/legal/acceptable-use-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-implemented-appeals",
        "question": "How were the ordered restriction safeguards implemented and monitored?",
        "why": "108(c)–(d) supply real duties; the current help synopsis alone cannot prove compliance or noncompliance.",
        "evidence": "Implemented restriction/appeal procedure, 110–116 Compliance Plan and Board-approved annual report, request/response samples and written modifications",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App — Your Account Is Closed, current help article",
            "url": "https://cash.app/help/us/en-us/8009-your-account-is-closed"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block — 16 January 2025 response to CFPB action",
            "url": "https://investors.block.xyz/investor-news/news-details/2025/Cash-Apps-Dedication-to-Customer-Service-and-Protection/default.aspx"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block enforcement case page",
            "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/enforcement/actions/block-inc/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block administrative docket",
            "url": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/administrative-adjudication-proceedings/administrative-adjudication-docket/block-inc/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-redress-execution",
        "question": "What was authorized and actually distributed under the CFPB Redress Plan?",
        "why": "Reserve, cap and company-reported civil-penalty payment do not establish consumer totals. Official AG referral now authenticates the domain link but not its administrator or checks.",
        "evidence": "119 non-objection and revisions, administrator appointment, 122 Redress Report and payment/receipt reconciliation",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CFPB — Block consent order 2025-CFPB-0001",
            "url": "https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_block-inc-consent-order_2025-01.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2025 Form 10-K — scoped litigation disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026012254/xyz-20251231.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cash App CFPB redress site — official AG referral established",
            "url": "https://www.cashappcfpbsettlement.com/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon AG announcement — redress-site referral only",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/media-home/news-media-releases/ag-rayfield-announces-45m-multistate-settlement-in-cash-app-investigation/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-consultant-execution",
        "question": "Who was engaged and what did the independent AML process produce?",
        "why": "Mandated role and reporting rights are documented; appointed firm and implemented CAP remain unidentified.",
        "evidence": "Executed engagement/selection notice, assessment, Board-approved CAP, state receipt, validation and extension records",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block BSA/AML consent order — CSBS body copy",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/node/521841"
          },
          {
            "title": "Maine — Block order landing and transcription",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/pfr/consumercredit/enforcement/enforcement_item.shtml?id=13145196"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-state-payment",
        "question": "How do the party list, allocations and actual state payments reconcile?",
        "why": "Maine Appendix A lists 49 jurisdictions; Appendix B has 48 rows summing exactly to USD 79.075 m, includes Colorado and omits Wyoming. Difference is not an arithmetic shortfall or proof of missing money.",
        "evidence": "Payment instructions/receipts, corrected or explained Appendix B, counterpart/accession and allocation records",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Multistate Block consent order — Maine full copy",
            "url": "https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?an=1&id=13145196"
          },
          {
            "title": "CSBS — 15 January 2025 multistate Block announcement",
            "url": "https://www.csbs.org/newsroom/state-regulators-issue-80-million-penalty-block-inc-cash-app-bsaaml-violations"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2024 Form 10-K — scoped payment disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828025007376/sq-20241231.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Block 2025 Form 10-K — scoped litigation disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026012254/xyz-20251231.htm"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-july-disposition",
        "question": "What remedy, credit and reimbursement mechanisms are contained in the July2026 AG instruments?",
        "why": "The separately accepted r24 July instruments now answer this intake question; actual payment, judicial entry and later performance remain separate where unverified.",
        "evidence": "Acquired July agreed instruments; existing entry/reimbursement successor records and remaining redress-performance evidence.",
        "status": "answered",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon AG announcement — redress-site referral only",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/media-home/news-media-releases/ag-rayfield-announces-45m-multistate-settlement-in-cash-app-investigation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": "r24 integrates agreed redress, CFPB credits, conditional fallback approval and investigation-expense reimbursement. It does not prove extra consumer payouts or reimbursement paid. Existing successors retain entered-version and reimbursement-allocation questions; actual consumer redress, credit reconciliation and fallback performance remain unverified here."
      },
      {
        "id": "w23-cash-l-doj-accrual",
        "question": "What later instrument, if any, resolves the DOJ matter behind the estimated loss?",
        "why": "Issuer Q2 2026 reports USD 526 m estimated loss; accrual is not a fine, payment or adjudicated outcome. Distinct from customer-remedy and Lantern cases.",
        "evidence": "Later primary disposition and accounting/payment reconciliation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Block Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — scoped subsequent-matter disclosure",
            "url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000162828026053368/xyz-20260630.htm"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w24-ag-l-entered-july",
        "question": "Which final entered versions and timing records govern the July agreement?",
        "why": "Party assent is observed but judicial entry/case number not; literal June30 deadline precedes stipulated July8 effect. No breach or deliberate backdating inferred.",
        "evidence": "Entered judgment/docket entry, signed time amendment and implemented restriction procedure/annual report",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California published proposed Block judgment",
            "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/People%20v%20Block%20Judgment.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w24-ag-l-reimbursement-allocation",
        "question": "Was the Cash App reimbursement paid, and how was it coded or allocated?",
        "why": "Agreed investigation-cost amount is inside the USD45m pool; no payment/expense allocation links it to older funds or NCII letter campaign.",
        "evidence": "Remittance/receipt, invoices, expense coding and fund/general-account allocation decision",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oregon signed-party Block stipulated judgment packet",
            "url": "https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-08-Cash-App-Multistate-Stipulated-General-Judgment-and-Money-Award-OR.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG FAQ — organizational resource and policy account",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/faqs/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w24-ag-l-current-fund-rights",
        "question": "How do current fund rules and actual awards relate to the dated special-committee instruments?",
        "why": "2012/2016 committees and current consolidated roster differ; actual amendment, balance, grant or disbursement not acquired.",
        "evidence": "Charter/amendment/delegation, latest fund statements/audit notes, application, vote/recusal and payment records",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Rules and Regulations of the VW Settlement Fund",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/VW-Settlement-Fund-Rules-and-Regulations-Final.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Financial Services and Consumer Protection Enforcement, Education, and Training Fund MOU",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/FSF-MOU-Oct-2012.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG consolidated consumer-protection/charity fund committee — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/committee/consolidated-consumer-protection-and-charity-funds-committee/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG leadership and governing structure — current page",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/about-naag/naag-leadership/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w24-ag-l-letter-origin",
        "question": "What drafting and jurisdiction sign-off records produced the August 2025 letters?",
        "why": "Clark authorship is officially attributed, while current May2026 procedure cannot prove 2025 circulation or external input.",
        "evidence": "Initiating draft/colleague letter, version history, 2025 procedure, sponsor instructions, signature audit and transmission log",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pennsylvania AG — NCII letter authorship and coalition announcement",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/ag-sunday-leads-bipartisan-coalition-urging-search-engine-payment-app-companies-to-stop-the-spread-of-deepfake-videos-and-photos/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NAAG Policy Letter Process — May 2026 version",
            "url": "https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NAAG-Policy-Letter-Procedure_v5_2026.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w24-ag-l-letter-outcome",
        "question": "Which recipient reply or decision is actually linked to the NCII requests?",
        "why": "Bounded response search found no company reply, meeting or implemented restriction tied to these letters. Idaho supplied a later threat, not outcome.",
        "evidence": "Reply, meeting/commitment log, policy-version change, merchant/acquirer instruction or resulting enforcement record",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Idaho AG Labrador — 19 September 2025 NCII warning",
            "url": "https://www.ag.idaho.gov/newsroom/labrador-letter-fighting-to-stop-big-techs-war-on-women-and-children/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w25-sf-l-notice-proof",
        "question": "Does the recipient-specific SF package satisfy the current statutory notice predicates?",
        "why": "Reported July notices and earlier general warning are distinct; confidential attachments, designated routing, receipt, responses and subsequent conduct determine the statutory bridge.",
        "evidence": "Complete notice, attachments, delivery/receipt proof, recipient response, court extension or adjudication",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w25-sf-july-notices",
          "w25-sf-notice-presumption",
          "w25-sf-city-attorney"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "California Civil Code 1708.86 — current amended text",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1708.86."
          },
          {
            "title": "Chronicle — reported SF Apple/Google notices",
            "url": "https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/apple-google-deepfake-nudify-apps-22350022.php"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIRED — Apple and Google spokesperson responses",
            "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-demands-apple-and-google-delete-ai-nudify-apps-from-app-stores/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney news — bounded publication recovery",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/cityattorney/news"
          },
          {
            "title": "47-AG combined payment/search letters — 22 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/wp-content/uploads/LTRS-TO-PAYMENT-AND-SEARCH-PLATFORMS_FINAL-47.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w25-sf-l-amendment-history",
        "question": "When did each enacted boundary enter, and what record attributes its selection?",
        "why": "March analysis documents proposed primary-purpose narrowing, but not obtained historical versions and later analysis prevent an adoption-date or lobbying-victory claim.",
        "evidence": "Permissibly supplied original dated versions, independently published committee analysis or drafting explanation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w25-sf-ab621",
          "w25-sf-bauer-kahan",
          "w25-sf-civil-liberties-advocacy"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Assembly Privacy analysis, 18 March 2025",
            "url": "https://apcp.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2025-03/ab-621-bauer-kahan.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — Chapter 673, Statutes of 2025",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          },
          {
            "title": "AB 621 — official procedural history",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621"
          },
          {
            "title": "Excluded historical-version attempt — chaptered bytes returned",
            "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB621&version=20250AB62199INT"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w25-sf-l-briver-compliance",
        "question": "Were Briver’s required information, attestations and penalties delivered?",
        "why": "Required recurring records and payment are documented; no actual delivery, receipt, satisfaction or compliance adjudication was acquired. Court query stopped at a human-verification gateway.",
        "evidence": "Paragraph16 response, sworn attestations and domain evidence, payment/satisfaction or enforcement record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w25-sf-briver",
          "w25-sf-briver-reporting",
          "w25-sf-city-attorney"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "People v. Sol Ecom — signed Briver final judgment",
            "url": "https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/sites/kernochan.law.columbia.edu/files/content/2025%20Symposium/People%20v.%20Sol%20Ecom%20Inc%20%28Briver%20Stipulated%20Final%20Judgment.PI%29.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SF Court Case Query — human-verification boundary",
            "url": "https://webapps.sftc.org/captcha/captcha.dll?referrer=https://webapps.sftc.org/ci/CaseInfo.dll?"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w25-sf-l-provider-execution",
        "question": "What did named providers do beyond producing subpoena records?",
        "why": "City reports broader cooperation, while Tilak reports specific record productions. Neither establishes a named provider shutdown instruction or execution.",
        "evidence": "Original subpoena/production instruments, takedown direction, provider response and dated implementation record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w25-sf-cloudflare",
          "w25-sf-namecheap",
          "w25-sf-namecom",
          "google",
          "w25-sf-case"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SF City Attorney — ten-site outcome announcement",
            "url": "https://www.sf.gov/news-city-attorney-shuts-down-10-websites-that-create-nonconsensual-deepfake-pornography"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w25-sf-l-drawnudes-assessment",
        "question": "What exactly did eSafety send to or conclude about the Drawnudes correspondent?",
        "why": "Interested-party claim is unverified. ClothOff messages show guidance and requests for information; unnamed later enforcement cannot establish service identity. The closest legal clock is22 December 2024, not a verified January approval regime.",
        "evidence": "Dated service-specific requirement, named legal basis/classification, response evidence and assessment/confirmation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w25-sf-drawnudes",
          "w25-sf-operator-claim",
          "w25-sf-clothoff",
          "esafety",
          "w25-sf-dis-standard"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Karun Tilak declaration — alternative service and Exhibit 6",
            "url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Chiu-v-Sol-Ecom-6-13-25-Declaration-of-Karun-Tilak.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety FOI 25202 — ClothOff correspondence and circulars",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/LOG_141_Document_Set.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety disclosure Log 141 — correspondence release",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corporate-documents/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log"
          },
          {
            "title": "DIS Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — F2024L00710",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00710/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "RES Class 1A/1B Industry Standard 2024 — companion clock",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00711/asmade/2024-06-21/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "BOSE Amendment Determination 2024 — different May clock",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2024L00590/asmade/2024-05-30/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Act 2024",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2024A00078/asmade/2024-09-02/text/original/pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — unnamed UK provider formal warning",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-moves-against-services-used-to-nudify-australian-school-children"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — reported withdrawal of three unnamed services",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-action-prevents-services-nudifying-australian-school-children"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — unnamed Argentina-based provider direction",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/esafety-takes-action-against-another-major-nudify-service-for-failing-to-protect-australian-children"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-related-party-instruments",
        "question": "What contracts, approvals and project ledgers explain the OHF–QuantSpark services and credit balances?",
        "why": "Filed control rights and two unaudited accounts establish a relationship, but not hourly rates, earmarked grant use, a classification instruction or settlement of balances. The GBP 80 invoice and GBP 1 balance differences remain unreconciled.",
        "evidence": "Executed service/loan agreements, related-party approvals, dated project cost ledgers and payment reconciliation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-ohf",
          "w26-ver-quantspark",
          "w26-ver-tat"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OHF — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/filing-history/MzUzNTQ3OTAwN2FkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — unaudited accounts to 31 July 2025",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/filing-history/MzUzMjkyNjYyM2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "OHF — registered voting and appointment control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11656320/persons-with-significant-control"
          },
          {
            "title": "QuantSpark — Adam Hadley registered control",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10304694/persons-with-significant-control"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-canada-acceptance",
        "question": "Which executed terms, accepted milestones and payments apply to contributions 21415 and 22841?",
        "why": "Disclosure totals and a reported launch are not acceptance or disbursement. Current May 2026 programme terms cannot supply absent historical schedules, cost allocations or IP licences.",
        "evidence": "Signed agreements and amendments, incorporated schedules, acceptance decisions, progress reports and disbursement records",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
          "w26-ver-canada-centre",
          "w26-ver-ohf",
          "w26-ver-ca21415",
          "w26-ver-ca22841"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada — original TCAP contribution 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C214-2019-2020-Q4-0048%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — amended TCAP total, agreement 21415",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2021-2022-Q3-00035%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "Canada — TCAP Phase 2 contribution 22841",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2022-2023-Q4-00199%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CRF — current funding terms and conditions",
            "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/fndng-prgrms/cmmnty-rslnc-fnd-trm-en.aspx?wbdisable=true"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — OHF Phase 2 entry",
            "url": "https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-announces-more-than-25-million-for-projects-to-counter-radicalization-to-violence.html"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-us-funding-outcome",
        "question": "What became of the US funding process described in October 2023, and which agency held it?",
        "why": "The public Canadian status account identifies prospective funding but no awarding agency, value, instrument or payment. NSC coordination does not make the NSC the funder.",
        "evidence": "Dated funding decision, agency identification, agreement, award notice or termination of the reported process",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-public-safety-canada",
          "w26-ver-us-nsc",
          "w26-ver-us-funding-process",
          "w26-ver-tat"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Public Safety Canada — CAN033380 status account",
            "url": "https://commissioningerenceetrangere.ca/fileadmin/commission_ingerence_etrangere/Documents/Preuves_et_Presentations/Preuves/CAN033380.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-uk-contract-execution",
        "question": "Was the pending Home Office pilot executed, and what acceptance and legal-party terms did it use?",
        "why": "The notice estimated a future signature and displayed unreconciled VAT values. A separate Ofcom listing remains an unverified lead in the accepted packet, not a demonstrated award or database-access right.",
        "evidence": "Executed contract, legal supplier identification, statement of work, pricing schedule, acceptance clauses and later performance or payment record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-uk-pilot",
          "w26-ver-tat",
          "w26-ver-ohf",
          "home-office"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Home Office — pending TCAP pilot UK5 notice",
            "url": "https://www.sell2wales.gov.wales/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=SEP653567&catID="
          },
          {
            "title": "Home Office — voluntary infrastructure-provider guidance",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers/voluntary-guidance-for-internet-infrastructure-providers-on-preventing-terrorism-online-accessible-version"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-paired-correction",
        "question": "Does an upstream classification correction reach a recipient and lead it to reopen a past restriction?",
        "why": "Current TCAP hash docs expose deletion and analyst feedback; GIFCT reports real internal corrections. Neither supplies a paired withdrawal, receipt, recipient review and restoration outcome. The old Altitude URL adapter is a distinct interface, not evidence of failure of current hash corrections.",
        "evidence": "Signal withdrawal record, delivery checkpoint or receipt, recipient correction policy, review decision and resulting content/account disposition",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-tcap-hash-api",
          "w26-ver-tcap-hash-feedback",
          "w26-ver-hash-recipient",
          "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
          "w26-ver-altitude"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current content-hash update documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/content-hash-list"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — current per-hash feedback documentation",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/hash-feedback"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2022 access and correction account",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Transparency-Report-2022.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — 2025 Annual and Transparency Report",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2025-GIFCT-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-access-agreements",
        "question": "What adopted access and reuse agreements govern Archive users and GIFCT participants?",
        "why": "Public prerequisites, member criteria and the dated organizational Code establish gates, while exact access/reuse permissions, information-sharing correction clauses and adoption of current-linked draft IAC terms remain not obtained. No public author-wide challenge right is inferred from an authenticated member interface.",
        "evidence": "Current executed or publicly adopted access licence, information-sharing agreement, approved IAC terms and appointment/response minutes",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-tcap-archive",
          "w26-ver-archive-audience",
          "w26-ver-gifct",
          "w26-ver-gifct-hsdb",
          "w26-ver-gifct-iac-draft"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "TCAP — onboarding prerequisite for API access",
            "url": "https://docs.terrorismanalytics.org/docs/api-services/authentication"
          },
          {
            "title": "TCAP — Archive policy destination without substantive text",
            "url": "https://terrorismanalytics.org/policies/archive"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — membership dues and admission criteria",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — Tech Solutions Code of Conduct v1.0 (2022)",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIFCT-Tech-Solution-Code-of-Ethics-GIFCT-For-Publishing-APPROVED-20221115-2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "GIFCT — current-linked draft IAC terms",
            "url": "https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/IAC-Terms-of-Reference.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w26-ver-l-altitude-deployment",
        "question": "Which named deployment used which version, source credentials, diagnostics and verdict receiver?",
        "why": "Pinned August 2024 code demonstrates defaults and local-log semantics. No customer configuration, actual verdict delivery, source diagnostic submission or tested correction/restoration chain was observed.",
        "evidence": "Versioned deployment/configuration, source-access agreement, receiver specification, acceptance test and correction-handling record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w26-ver-altitude",
          "w26-ver-altitude-operator",
          "w26-ver-altitude-verdict-delivery",
          "w26-ver-tcap"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — readme",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/README.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — import-config",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/api/importer.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tasks",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/taskqueue/tasks.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — tcap-adapter",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/tcap_api.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Altitude pinned source — base-importer",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jigsaw-Code/altitude/496951f7d7a83508e9fac5709d4db2e91c654685/signal-service/src/importers/importer.py"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-ccf-governing-instrument",
        "question": "Which adopted CCF deed and appointment records implement the proposed governance split?",
        "why": "Current self-description and the 2023 initial proposal cannot establish appointment quotas, vetoes, quorum, delegation or donor rights. Secondary identifier CC62350 and 27 May 2024 registration claim remain unverified against an official row; closed register/OData failures are not absence proof.",
        "evidence": "Adopted governing deed and amendments, current trustee appointment/removal record, delegations and reserved-matters schedule",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-ccf",
          "w27-roost-call-leaders",
          "w27-roost-proposal2023"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "2023 Summit — Next steps for a resilient Christchurch Call",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/content/files/2024/06/Leaders-Summit-2023-Meeting-paper-Next-steps-for-a-resilient-Christchurch-Call.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "NZ–France joint Foundation launch announcement",
            "url": "https://www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2024/05/14/joint-press-release-between-france-and-new-zealand-launch-of-the-christchurch-call-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — current institutional self-description",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/the-foundation"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF official registry entry attempt — content not acquired",
            "url": "https://register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/ViewCharity?accountId=CC62350"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF official open-data query — no entity record acquired",
            "url": "https://www.odata.charities.govt.nz/Organisations"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-ccan-fundholder",
        "question": "Which member holds CCAN operational funds, on what terms and with what accounting?",
        "why": "Published terms establish an expected intermediary/MOU structure and Core decisions but not named custody, a signed memorandum, amounts, account signatories or actual compliance.",
        "evidence": "Executed funding memorandum, named legal fundholder, budget approvals, disbursement and reporting records",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-ccan",
          "w27-roost-ccan-core",
          "w27-roost-ccan-fundholder",
          "w27-roost-ccf"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCAN terms — internal decisions and fundholder",
            "url": "https://christchurchcall.network/wp-content/uploads/CCAN-TOR-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-roost-resources",
        "question": "What restrictions, allocations and paid/in-kind reconciliation govern ROOST founding resources?",
        "why": "Three issuer totals are non-additive and unallocated. Founding labels and professional board affiliations do not establish donor instruction rights; published technical governance is not a grant contract.",
        "evidence": "Contribution agreements, cash/in-kind valuation schedules, receipts, donor reserved rights and board budget delegations",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-roost",
          "w27-roost-resource-account",
          "w27-roost-roost-board",
          "w27-roost-tdc"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST issuer launch — more than $27 million reported",
            "url": "https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leading-technology-companies-and-foundations-back-new-initiative-to-provide-free-open-source-tools-for-a-safer-internet-in-the-ai-era-302371239.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST president — resources and collaboration launch letter",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/launching-roost-a-letter-of-gratitude/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST first 100 days — funding and in-kind total",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/roost-s-first-100-days-building-planning/"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST Project Roles — appointment, roadmap and merge powers",
            "url": "https://community.roost.tools/roles.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — current Board/TDC and professional affiliations",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/who-we-are/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-roost-employer",
        "question": "What executed Global Impact–ROOST arrangement allocates employer, fiscal and approval responsibilities?",
        "why": "A current advertised vacancy establishes stated prospective employment, not universal payroll arrangements, fiscal sponsorship, grant ownership or actual hires.",
        "evidence": "Employer-services or fiscal agreement, authorized scope, legal parties, financial custody and appointment/approval delegations",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-global-impact",
          "w27-roost-columbia-igp",
          "w27-roost-roost"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ROOST vacancy — Global Impact advertised employer",
            "url": "https://robust-open-online-safety-tools.breezy.hr/p/041580692d75-marketing-manager"
          },
          {
            "title": "Columbia SIPA — ROOST incubation and intended independence",
            "url": "https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/research-columbia-sipas-institute-global-politics-leads-launch-major-opensource-ai-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST — legal identity in website privacy statement",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/privacy-policy/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-canada-project-acceptance",
        "question": "Did contribution26007 fund the CCF policy pack or any accepted ROOST output, and who approved it?",
        "why": "The Canadian recipient is CCF; ROOST appears in expected workstreams. A pre-award collaboration and later attributed policy pack establish real connections without a subaward, budget allocation, accepted milestone or government approval of definitions.",
        "evidence": "Executed contribution schedules, CCF–ROOST agreement/subaward if any, dated cost ledger, deliverable acceptance and payment record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-canada26007",
          "w27-roost-ccf",
          "w27-roost-ccf-elevate",
          "w27-roost-roost",
          "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Canada contribution 26007 — CCF three workstreams",
            "url": "https://search.open.canada.ca/grants/record/ps-sp%2C088-2025-2026-Q3-00044%2Ccurrent"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF — Canadian investment and Elevate announcement",
            "url": "https://www.christchurchcall.org/canadian-investment-advances-christchurch-calls-work-to-tackle-violent-extremist-content-risk-in-emerging-technologies-and-to-support-small-and-medium-sized-platforms-to-counter-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF partnership statement — authorized ROOST reprint",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/christchurch-call-partners-with-roost-for-open-source-ai-tools-to-tackle-tvec/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-named-policy-deployment",
        "question": "Which exact production revisions, local policies and correction procedures governed the reported Osprey deployments?",
        "why": "Discord and Bluesky report production with local rules and effects. Neither account joins the CCF pack or Phoebe prototype to that deployment; no paired upstream correction, recipient update and reopened decision was acquired.",
        "evidence": "Versioned production configuration, adopted policy provenance, locally approved changes, effects/rollback specifications and permissible correction-to-outcome records",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-osprey",
          "discord",
          "w27-roost-bluesky",
          "w27-roost-bluesky-effects",
          "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
          "w27-roost-phoebe"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Discord engineering — production Osprey architecture",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/osprey-open-sourcing-our-rule-engine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Discord leader — Osprey donation and reintegration",
            "url": "https://discord.com/blog/how-roost-is-advancing-online-safety"
          },
          {
            "title": "ROOST case study — Bluesky Osprey workflow",
            "url": "https://roost.tools/blog/how-bluesky-transformed-their-safety-operations-with-osprey/"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "RMC integration guide — operator choices",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/RMC%20Guide%20to%20Using%20Open%20Safety%20Models.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Osprey adapter — save and dry-run validation",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/osprey/osprey.py"
          },
          {
            "title": "Phoebe Ozone adapter — label methods unimplemented",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haileyok/phoebe/dfb2bf206fc6cf757b5f10fb4c318ce9a3cce062/src/ozone/ozone.py"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-template-reconciliation",
        "question": "How were INCITE1, EDSA precedence and finite evaluation weaknesses resolved before any intended deployment?",
        "why": "Observed template ambiguity and a failed recruitment target warrant a versioned correction, but they are not proof of an actual bad moderation decision. The inspected August pin and finite history do not disclose every later revision.",
        "evidence": "Versioned policy clarification, category mapping, evaluation protocol/data provenance and release/acceptance record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-ccf-tvec-pack",
          "w27-roost-rmc",
          "w27-roost-maintainers"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CCF contributed TVEC policy template",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/tvec-policy"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy evaluation — finite 170-item test",
            "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/roostorg/model-community/22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6/resources/policy-packs/christchurch-call-foundation/tvec-policy/evaluation%20report.md"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy relocation — repository history metadata",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=resources%2Fpolicy-packs%2Fchristchurch-call-foundation%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          },
          {
            "title": "CCF policy earlier-path history",
            "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/roostorg/model-community/commits?path=gpt-oss-safeguard%2Fprojects%2Ftvec-policy&sha=22b3bd48562616f9379eb6fa63abe131346a6de6&per_page=5"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w27-roost-l-pathways-engagement",
        "question": "Which accepted support or consulting agreement produced an implemented change, and when did Stability enroll?",
        "why": "Public conditions preserve implementation choice; a different Elevate terms destination is not obtained. The company says both July2024 and2025 for enrollment. No named support instruction, implemented policy change or ROOST/Lantern use follows.",
        "evidence": "Accepted registration/terms version, dated enrollment, scoped proposal and consulting agreement, delivered recommendation and participant adoption decision",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w27-roost-pathways",
          "w27-roost-pathways-terms",
          "w27-roost-tc-elevate",
          "w27-roost-stability-ai"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Pathways — current eligibility and offerings",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Pathways public terms — nine conditions",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/pathways/terms-and-conditions/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Tech Coalition Elevate — tailored advisory service",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/programs/elevate/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stability AI — Pathways and Coalition participation account",
            "url": "https://stability.ai/news-updates/stability-ai-joins-the-tech-coalition"
          },
          {
            "title": "Published Brennan bundle — Stability AI 21 January 2025 email",
            "url": "https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/tech-company-email-responses_redacted.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-licence-contract",
        "question": "Which actual Microsoft–Coalition and applicant instruments govern software sublicensing?",
        "why": "Cloud2018terms, programme eligibility and reference-feed rights are distinct; missing contracts would locate reserved approvals and termination.",
        "evidence": "Master/applicant sublicense and reasoned grant/refusal record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-photodna",
          "w28-access-photodna-cloud",
          "w28-access-tc-sublicensing",
          "w28-access-licensed-implementer"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PhotoDNA Cloud terms — May 2018 text",
            "url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/termsofuse"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2023 annual report — Microsoft licensing statement",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech_Coalition_Annual-Report-2023.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition 2024 annual report — non-member licensing and HMA",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Tech-Coalition-Annual-Report-2024.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Coalition — expanded PhotoDNA licensing",
            "url": "https://technologycoalition.org/news/the-tech-coalition-empowers-industry-to-combat-online-child-sexual-abuse-with-expanded-photodna-licensing/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-reference-correction",
        "question": "Which public trace connects retraction/visibility changes to client correction and restored content?",
        "why": "NCMEC correction account and Snap status filtering are meaningful but do not establish universal recipient erasure/restoration.",
        "evidence": "Non-personal schema, audit and downstream acknowledgement",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-ncmec-reference",
          "w28-access-ncmec-client",
          "w28-access-stop-reference",
          "w28-access-stop-partner"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing v2 — access and retraction API",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/"
          },
          {
            "title": "NCMEC Hash Sharing — client usage recommendations",
            "url": "https://hashsharing.ncmec.org/npo/v2/documentation/usage-recommendations.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Concentrix attestation — 2023 hash-list review",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/Concentrix-NCMEC-document.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII API v2 public reference",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/stopncii-api-reference-v2.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "eSafety — Snap provider response on StopNCII",
            "url": "https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/BOSE-full-report-CSEA-sexual-extortion-periodic-notices-Feb2026Update_0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-partner-dsa",
        "question": "What signed current StopNCII agreement resolves purpose, fees, termination and screening review?",
        "why": "Posted public text has unfinished brackets, conflicting legal identifiers and inconsistent tier benefits; no participant-specific assent acquired.",
        "evidence": "Signed DSA, final terms/benefit schedule and reviewed decision",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-stop-partner-terms",
          "w28-access-stop-applicant-process",
          "w28-access-stop-approved",
          "w28-access-stop-programme"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "StopNCII posted partner terms — unfinished clauses",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/register/terms-of-service/"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL privacy — applicant screening and challenge process",
            "url": "https://swgfl.org.uk/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII — participation comparison",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Approved Participant route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/approved-participants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "StopNCII Programme Partner route",
            "url": "https://stopncii.org/partners/join/programme-partners/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-operator-grant-rights",
        "question": "What donor and internal-delegation instruments govern StopNCII money and policy decisions?",
        "why": "Pershing label supports purpose-specific income but not donor identity, full programme budget or donor approval powers.",
        "evidence": "Grant/partnership schedules, programme budget/delegation and approval minutes",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-swgfl",
          "w28-access-swgfl-trustees",
          "w28-access-pershing-fund",
          "w28-access-stopncii"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL articles adopted10October2024",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ0MDQ5NTAzNmFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-uksic-instruments",
        "question": "What do the actual UKSIC grant and consortium instruments assign for allocation, reporting, acceptance and renewal?",
        "why": "Childnet discloses a formal partnership, IWF describes financial-return/evaluator liaison, and Nominet reports a March 2025 programme end with continuing support. None supplies signed allocation, approval, termination or renewal terms.",
        "evidence": "Executed 2021/2022 grant and consortium partnership agreement; financial/reporting schedules; amendments or renewal instruments; named return/acceptance record",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-nominet",
          "w28-access-uksic",
          "w28-access-uksic-consortium-agreement",
          "w28-access-childnet",
          "w28-access-swgfl",
          "iwf"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF Project Officer recruitment specification",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/ns0pgbuk/recruitment-pack-project-officer.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2021 UKSIC funding pledge",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/news/uk-safer-internet-centre-receives-5-1-million-funding-lifeline-from-nominet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue: UKSIC programme end and support",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-uksic-reconciliation",
        "question": "What accounts for the GBP 132,208 gap between the FY 2025 recipient UKSIC-related rows and Nominet’s grant table?",
        "why": "SWGfL GBP 773,395 + IWF GBP 568,707 + Childnet GBP 437,106 = GBP 1,779,208, versus donor GBP 1,647,000, difference GBP 132,208. All year ends are 31 March 2025; common coverage/recognition bases remain unproved, especially Childnet’s complete fund composition. This is an accounting comparison, not missing or diverted cash.",
        "evidence": "FY2025 donor-to-recipient reconciliation, financial return, allocation schedule and restricted-fund income breakdown",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-nominet",
          "w28-access-uksic",
          "w28-access-swgfl",
          "iwf",
          "w28-access-childnet",
          "w28-access-caf-account"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY25-annual-report-and-accounts.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "SWGfL filed FY2025 accounts — restricted funds",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05589479/filing-history/MzQ5NjAyMTA2NGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 trustees report and accounts",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Childnet FY2025 annual report and accounts",
            "url": "https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/03958416/filing-history/MzQ5NjAxODE2N2FkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w28-access-l-sid-commission-rights",
        "question": "What approval rights, if any, accompanied Nominet’s disclosed input to the 2026 research design?",
        "why": "The published report states commissioning/funding, donor input, Childnet design lead and Opinium survey delivery. It does not reveal which questions changed or whether input was advisory, jointly agreed or backed by final approval.",
        "evidence": "2025/2026 research brief or commissioning agreement; design change/approval history; acceptance terms",
        "status": "open",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-nominet",
          "w28-access-childnet",
          "w28-access-opinium",
          "w28-access-sid-research2026"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Safer Internet Day 2026: commissioning and study design",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Safer-Internet-Day-2026-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-nominet-iwf-case",
        "question": "What exact IWF request protocol and redacted case trace connect request, registry action and correction?",
        "why": "2013 cooperation and later reported requests are real, but do not show a current IWF certification right, individual suspension or downstream restoration. Funding predates/follows independently.",
        "evidence": "Current cooperation agreement; redacted request/assessment/notice/outcome/reversal trace; current complaints instrument",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w28-access-nominet",
          "iwf",
          "w29-enf-cpp2026",
          "w29-enf-registrant"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2013 registration-policy review terms of reference",
            "url": "https://media.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/RegistrationPolicyReview-TermsofReference.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet criminality report for November 2022–October 2023",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Nominet-2023-Criminality-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet 2025 Impact Issue — criminal activity spread",
            "url": "https://www.nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/The-2025-Impact-Issue-Final-Report.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-police-registry-agreement",
        "question": "What operative agreement and case trace implement the Ashiko police-to-registry route?",
        "why": "Published2020 police policy describes an agreement and DCI authorisation, while July2026CPP has its own wording. Actual agreement/current reconciliation and case execution were not acquired.",
        "evidence": "Operative agreement/version schedule; authorisation and registry notification; redacted challenge/outcome record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-pipcu",
          "w29-enf-ashiko",
          "w29-enf-pipcu-dci",
          "w28-access-nominet",
          "w29-enf-registrar"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Operation Ashiko Suspension Policy, version1.2–20",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu---website-domain-suspension-policy--counterfeit-goods-.uk.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Nominet Criminal Practices Policy, 6 July 2026",
            "url": "https://nominet.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Criminal-Practices-Policy-06_07_2026.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-funding-instruments",
        "question": "What does the2026/27 signed Service Agreement fund and condition, and how does it reconcile with IPO additional dividends?",
        "why": "Official baseline commitment, paid dividend toDSIT and participant-attributed signing are distinct. Contract schedule, police receipt and programme allocation remain unknown.",
        "evidence": "Executed annual Service Agreement/schedules; funding assurance/payment reconciliation; permitted publication of previously non-public budget appendix",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-ipo",
          "w15-impl-dsit",
          "w29-enf-city-police",
          "w29-enf-pipcu",
          "w29-enf-signing2026"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2025/26 accounts — additional dividend and enforcement scope",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          },
          {
            "title": "City of London Police 2025 budget proposal for decision",
            "url": "https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s215023/FINAL_C%20-%20Copy.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-pilot-rules",
        "question": "Which co-funders, selection and conflict rules are adopted for the proposedApril2027industry pilot?",
        "why": "Announcement identifies joint IPO/PIPCU design but no contributor, payment, veto, case-right or accepted priority weight. Attendance at baseline signing does not answer it.",
        "evidence": "Approved pilot terms/criteria; contribution instruments; recusals; priority-setting and case-independence provisions",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-ipo",
          "w29-enf-pipcu",
          "w29-enf-cofunding-pilot",
          "w29-enf-alliance",
          "w29-enf-sky-role"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IPO confirms PIPCU baseline funding and future industry co-funding pilot",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ipo-confirms-continued-funding-for-specialist-ip-crime-unit"
          },
          {
            "title": "Public post attributing 2026/27 Service Agreement signing and industry attendance",
            "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ipo-counter-infringement_following-our-confirmation-of-three-year-activity-7466146726517620738-7QmF"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-priority-current-rules",
        "question": "How do historical Steering Group priorities, current Gateway triage and the later IP Crime Group bodies connect in operative terms?",
        "why": "Records establish distinct stages and reported bodies, without a common charter, current weighting or private power over an individual case.",
        "evidence": "Current intake/triage guidance; delegation chart; group terms and decision/recusal records; requested-refused referral examples",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-steering-group",
          "w29-enf-gateway",
          "w29-enf-pipcu",
          "w29-enf-ipcg-delivery",
          "w29-enf-ipcg-industry-advisory",
          "w29-enf-ipcg-executive"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "PIPCU posted historical referral guide — remit, evidence and case acceptance",
            "url": "https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/images/city-of-london/about-us/pipcu/pipcu-referral-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Intelligence Gateway intake change, effective 11 August 2025",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-intelligence-gateway-for-ip-crime-submissions"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-rusi-commission",
        "question": "What funding and clearance instruments governed the March2021 RUSI research?",
        "why": "The five co-funders, funding-independent authorship statement, validation exclusions and later MPA citation are documented. Amounts, contracting identity and approval rights are not.",
        "evidence": "Grant/commission agreements, payment/allocations, review/clearance rights and design/validation record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-rusi",
          "w29-enf-rusi-report2021",
          "w29-enf-ipo",
          "w29-enf-alliance",
          "w1-icmec-mpa",
          "w29-enf-industry-trust",
          "w29-enf-premier-league"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "RUSI Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime: Piracy and Organised Crime, March2021 corrected version",
            "url": "https://static.rusi.org/whr_ip_crime_web_version_0.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-kybc-government-disposition",
        "question": "Which specific KYBC options, objections and drafts were accepted or rejected after the named forums and roundtables?",
        "why": "The documentary path reaches consultation publication, parliamentary advocacy, report citation and government consideration. It does not yet reach an approved binding business-verification or service-cessation rule.",
        "evidence": "Options/disposition table; roundtable minutes; drafting/clearance record; accepted text, impact and challenge design",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-kybc-forum",
          "w29-enf-music-response2021",
          "w29-enf-sector-vision2023",
          "w29-enf-alliance-kybc2020",
          "w29-enf-bpi-kybc2020",
          "w29-enf-cic-briefing2021"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Government response to Economics of Music Streaming, recommendation23",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7407/documents/77629/default/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO Counter-Infringement Strategy 2022–2027 — operational, governance and KYBC scopes",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ip-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027/intellectual-property-counter-infringement-strategy-2022-to-2027"
          },
          {
            "title": "IPO FY2022/23 counter-infringement governance and KYBC forums",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ipo-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023/the-patent-office-annual-report-and-accounts-2022-to-2023-html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Creative Industries Sector Vision, June2023 — KYBC item",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64898de2b32b9e000ca96712/Creative_Industries_Sector_Vision__accessible_version_.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "MPA FDF0068 and annexed rightsholder KYBC briefing",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/108468/pdf/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w29-enf-l-advertising-terms-outcome",
        "question": "What do the agreed advertising working-group terms and eventual report establish, and how did the March2026 timetable develop?",
        "why": "February minutes record workplan agreement; March strategy gives expected report-back/conditional legislation and a separate OSA timetable. Neither establishes a completed2027output or current commencement status.",
        "evidence": "Agreed terms/workplan; delivered report/acceptance; dated consultation/commencement instruments; exact referral/action/correction rules",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-oat",
          "w29-enf-ad-fraud-working-group",
          "w29-enf-iab-uk",
          "w29-enf-fraud-strategy2026",
          "ofcom",
          "w29-enf-oap2023"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Taskforce minutes, meeting26February2026",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69b92ee1635612b767a465e1/Online_Advertising_Taskforce__26_February_2026_minutes.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Fraud Strategy March2026 — advertising partnership and attributed statutory timetable",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69aea29d917847c0a4c8999e/E03551200_Fraud_Strategy_2026__English__ELAY.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Advertising Programme consultation response, July2023",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-advertising-programme-consultation/outcome/government-response-to-online-advertising-programme-consultation"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-iwl-correction",
        "question": "What current IWL decision and update record shows an accepted challenge reaching advertising recipients?",
        "why": "Dated police removal duties and offered feeds do not establish current deployment or recipient restoration.",
        "evidence": "Current operating procedure or redacted inclusion/challenge/removal notice and recipient acknowledgment",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w29-enf-pipcu",
          "w30-class-iwl",
          "w30-class-ad-recipients"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Policing Fraud: Operation Creative case study released in FOIA-2021-094",
            "url": "https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2021-10/FOIA-2021-094-Guidance-and-Reference-Materials.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Op Creative Portal contract notice 012517-2024",
            "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/012517-2024/PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAB UK Infringing Website List guide",
            "url": "https://www.iabuk.com/policy/infringing-website-list-iwl"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-wipo-alert-agreements",
        "question": "What executed WIPO ALERT contributor/user terms govern updates and particular list permissions?",
        "why": "2019framework/currentFAQ are explicit but not executed contemporary agreements; actual PIPCU contribution remains unproved.",
        "evidence": "Current versioned LoU/user agreement and dated contributor admission/update record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-wipo",
          "w30-class-wipo-alert",
          "w30-class-contributors"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/14/9 BRIP Database framework",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_14/wipo_ace_14_9.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO ALERT user FAQ: access, use and updates",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-alert/faqs"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-advertiser-execution",
        "question": "Which named advertising buyer implemented a selected list and revisited it after correction?",
        "why": "Contract recommendations and marketplace offerings do not settle pre/post-purchase payment or restored placements.",
        "evidence": "Executed placement/configuration instrument and redacted correction/reconciliation record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-ad-recipients",
          "w30-class-whitebullet",
          "w30-class-peer39"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Thinkbox supplementary parliamentary evidence ADV0038",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/85971/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "White Bullet and Peer39 proposed Q3 launch",
            "url": "https://www.white-bullet.com/white-bullet-partners-with-peer39-to-help-defund-online-piracy"
          },
          {
            "title": "Peer39 current marketplace: White Bullet offering",
            "url": "https://www.peer39.com/marketplace/"
          },
          {
            "title": "LCCP 16.1.1: Responsible placement of digital adverts",
            "url": "https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/lccp/condition/16-1-1-responsible-placement-of-digital-adverts"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-pay-case",
        "question": "Which ALERT-PAY notice led to which provider decision and correction?",
        "why": "Pilot71%composite removals do not isolate merchant restriction, operator response, errors or review.",
        "evidence": "Versioned participation/notice/review terms and redacted completed case/outcome table",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-pay",
          "w30-class-payment-providers",
          "mastercard"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/40 presentation: ALERT-PAY",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_40_presentation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO/ACE/18/2/REV activities report: paragraph13",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wipo_ace_18/wipo_ace_18_2_rev.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Anti-Piracy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/anti-piracy-policy.html"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-pay-resource",
        "question": "Who accepts and pays for ALERT-PAY deployment?",
        "why": "Approved priority and broad ER2.3 resources do not disclose a project earmark, supplier payment or go-live.",
        "evidence": "Project authorization, cost-centre/milestone/acceptance or dated go-live record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-wipo",
          "w30-class-pay",
          "w30-class-wipo-er23"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "WIPO approved Programme of Work and Budget 2026/27",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-budget-2026-27.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO Results, Budget and Performance",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/about-wipo/budget/index"
          },
          {
            "title": "WIPO Performance Report 2024/25: ER2.3 and sector scope",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/about-wipo/docs-en-budget-pdf-wpr-2024-25.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "ACE18 recap: June update published August2026",
            "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/respect-for-ip/w/ace/18-highlights-global-cooperation-and-innovation-in-ip-enforcement"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-match-correction",
        "question": "How did a corrected MATCH entry affect a prior recipient's decision?",
        "why": "Response/removal/purge and privacy rights differ from recipient record retention and admission.",
        "evidence": "Redacted correction decision, recipient notice and separate admission outcome",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-match",
          "mc-acquirers",
          "stripe",
          "w30-class-merchants"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Mastercard Security Rules and Procedures, Merchant Edition: Chapter11",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/mccom/shared/business/support/rules-pdfs/SPME-Manual.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Mastercard MATCH Pro Privacy Notice",
            "url": "https://www.mastercard.com/global/en/match-privacy-notice.html"
          },
          {
            "title": "Stripe: Terminated merchant files / MATCH acceptance practice",
            "url": "https://docs.stripe.com/disputes/match?locale=en-GB"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-egumball-outcome",
        "question": "Was the ordered updated public brief filed and did eGumball later obtain a substantive remedy?",
        "why": "2023/2025procedural results are not delisting/restoration;28document public-brief order gives a precise reopening record.",
        "evidence": "Updated redacted brief inG062863 and later public disposition/removal confirmation; exact Paysafe entity reconciliation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-egumball",
          "w30-class-merrick",
          "w30-class-egumball2025"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "eGumball v Merrick Bank, G060853, 17May2023 opinion",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6469db1542d466566c722fd1"
          },
          {
            "title": "eGumball G062863M: April2025 opinion and May6 modification",
            "url": "https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/681cabf2d974c6edd357ad3b"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-filmon-remedy",
        "question": "What happened on remand to FilmOn's classification/correction claim?",
        "why": "Reversal and alleged2013demand establish a challenge, not label falsity, damages or restored advertising.",
        "evidence": "Later order/agreement and correction/recipient notice; underlying public appendix correspondence",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-filmon",
          "w30-class-dv-inc",
          "w30-class-historical-dv-reports"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "FilmOn.com v DoubleVerify, S244157: Supreme Court opinion",
            "url": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S244157.PDF"
          },
          {
            "title": "FilmOn opening brief: attributed correction account",
            "url": "https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/2-s244157-app-opening-brief-merits-011618.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-dv-input-map",
        "question": "Which NCMEC files, columns and provider/domain mappings did DV use?",
        "why": "Incoming/outbound counts, repeated notices and threecategories make the exact transformation consequential; no misuse is inferred.",
        "evidence": "Dated source inventory, category version, mapping/filter and exclusion specification",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-dv",
          "w30-class-dv-ncmec-input",
          "w30-class-ncmec-outbound",
          "w30-class-hi-category"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify February2025 categories, defaults and NCMEC input account",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/verify/taking-action-strengthening-protections-against-high-risk-ad-supported-content-and-attacking-the-csam-issue-together"
          },
          {
            "title": "2021 Notifications Sent by NCMEC per ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2021-notifications-by-ncmec-per-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to responsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-responsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 notifications to unresponsive providers",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-notifications-by-ncmec-to-unresponsive-esp.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "2023 incoming CyberTipline reports by ESP",
            "url": "https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/2023-reports-by-esp.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-dv-correction",
        "question": "What governs category override and propagation from an IWF update to customer action?",
        "why": "Upstream daily maintenance and reported integration do not prove domain reclassification, platform update or ad restoration.",
        "evidence": "Applicable category/default/licence/update agreement or worked correction with recipient acknowledgment",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-iwf-url",
          "w30-class-hi-category",
          "w30-class-dv-platforms",
          "w30-class-advertiser-customers"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify publisher assessment and review statement",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/blog/omnichannel/dvmap/addressing-publisher-measurement-with-impartiality"
          },
          {
            "title": "DoubleVerify April2025 default adoption and IWF partnership progress",
            "url": "https://doubleverify.com/company/newsroom/doubleverify-partners-with-iwf-to-drive-greater-ad-ecosystem-safety-and-strengthen-initiatives-against-child-sexual-abuse-material-online"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual report2025 dynamic-list maintenance and DV testimonial",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/annual-data-insights-report-2025/organisation-insights/our-dynamic-lists/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-dv-membership-terms",
        "question": "What are the exact DV membership signatory, amount, period and licence/governance terms?",
        "why": "Over£25kband and general annual framework are not an invoice or assessment veto; FY2025accounts precede membership start.",
        "evidence": "Executed2025membership/fee/licence schedule, receipt and any council nomination record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-dv",
          "iwf",
          "w30-class-iwf-council"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "IWF DoubleVerify member card and contribution band",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF annual fee framework",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/fees/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF membership and Funding Council application route",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IWF FY2025 accounts: membership governance and recognition scope",
            "url": "https://www.iwf.org.uk/media/gxmk1ul2/iwf-trustees-annual-report-accounts-2024-2025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-pressure-disposition",
        "question": "What did DV and TAG actually answer and which criteria changed?",
        "why": "Requests/claimed advocacy and later product reports do not isolate causation; TAG reports no BSCviolations.",
        "evidence": "Dated DV reply/product decision, TAG23-page response/findings and contribution correspondence",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-dv",
          "w30-class-tag",
          "w30-class-senate-inquiry",
          "w30-class-cma"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to DoubleVerify",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/F66FDFEE-380D-4C81-802A-2FD93626F8DB"
          },
          {
            "title": "Senators letter to Trustworthy Accountability Group",
            "url": "https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/64135EE2-0EE5-46C2-9879-7FC7B454416B"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads account of advocacy contribution to Senate inquiry",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/announcement/with-the-support-of-check-my-ads-institutes-advocacy-congress-launches-bipartisan-inquiry-into-adtech-firms-monetization-of-child-abuse/"
          },
          {
            "title": "TAG Impact and Compliance Report2025: visible brand-safety section",
            "url": "https://2848641.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2848641/Impact%20and%20Compliance/TAG%20Impact&Compliance%20Report%202025.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w30-class-l-counterpressure-outcome",
        "question": "What followed the preservation demand and separate Adalytics complaint?",
        "why": "CMAresponse asserts a position; court relief was merely requested against Adalytics and current status was not acquired.",
        "evidence": "Actual preservation confirmation, later instrument namingCMA, or case8:25-cv-01535disposition/settlement",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-cma",
          "w30-class-adalytics",
          "w30-class-dv-holdings",
          "w30-class-dv-complaint"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Paul Hastings/Bondi preservation letter for DV to Check My Ads",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.14-Document-Preservation-Letter-to-Check-My-Ads-Institute_Redacted-1.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Check My Ads response to preservation letter",
            "url": "https://checkmyads.org/statement/check-my-ads-institute-statement-in-response-to-doubleverify-legal-letter/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Filed DoubleVerify Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc complaint against Adalytics",
            "url": "https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DoubleVerify_Holdings_Inc_et_al_v_ADALYTICS_RESEARCH_LLC__mddce-25-01535__0001.0.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-grantconditions",
        "question": "What do the named CMA grant agreements permit donors to approve or reclaim?",
        "why": "Published awards and KR internal selection rights establish resources and entry decisions, but not CMA editorial control, tranche release or campaign allocation.",
        "evidence": "Executed award letters, approved applications/budgets, incorporated reporting/amendment/termination terms and recipient recognition",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-cma",
          "w31-fa-ford",
          "w31-fa-kr",
          "oak",
          "w31-fa-krboard"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ford Foundation grant 144432 — historical approval",
            "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/check-my-ads-institute-144432/"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation 2023 annual report — donor-authored third-party republication",
            "url": "https://americansforpublictrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2023-KR-Foundation-Annual-Report.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "KR Foundation public 2025 grant list",
            "url": "https://krfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/2025-List-of-grants.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Grant application process and timeline",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Oak-Foundation-Grant-application-process-and-timeline.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-donorrows",
        "question": "Can primary row facsimiles and award records resolve Democracy Fund amounts and the indexed Ford2025 entry?",
        "why": "Reader alignment and indexed discovery cannot establish exact payments, future commitment totals or award identity. Avoid summing future schedules and paid installments.",
        "evidence": "Readable original grant schedules, exact Ford2025 detail/ID and award-to-payment reconciliation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w31-fa-democracy",
          "w31-fa-ford",
          "w30-class-cma"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2023 Form 990-PF — CMA paid and future schedules",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2023-Democracy-Fund-Form-990-PF.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Democracy Fund 2024 Form 990-PF — CMA schedule scope",
            "url": "https://democracyfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2024-Democracy-Fund-990-PF-FINAL.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ford Foundation March 2025 indexed grant lead",
            "url": "https://www.fordfoundation.org/work/our-grants/awarded-grants/grants-database/?locations=918&order=asc&orderby=date&page=162"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-cmarest",
        "question": "What final decisions, if any, address CMA's non-crisis verification and sanctions proposals?",
        "why": "An explicit crisis-monetization rejection cannot be extrapolated to the rest of the31-page response; roadmap forecasts are not final adoption.",
        "evidence": "Final additional-safety decision, response matrix, code amendments and actual commencement/issue records",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w30-class-cma",
          "ofcom",
          "w31-fa-creatorchecks",
          "w31-fa-premonetization",
          "w31-fa-sanctions"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Response to consultation: Online Safety Act — Additional Safety Measures",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/check-my-ads-institute.pdf?v=409158"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom roadmap — remaining additional measures forecast",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-meetingrecord",
        "question": "What exact question and clearance record produced the ministerial-notice recommendation?",
        "why": "Ofcom gives two attributable inputs but no minute or drafting allocation. Later Full Fact text does not establish its role in the earlier meeting.",
        "evidence": "4August2025 agenda/minute; marked draft; initial planning document;17/22October2024 correspondence;21–26May2026 approval record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "ofcom",
          "w31-fa-fullfact",
          "w31-fa-dsitmeeting",
          "w31-fa-noticechange"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Full Fact's Submission to Ofcom's Additional Safety Measures Consultation",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-online-safety---additional-safety-measures/responses/full-fact.pdf?v=409176"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom FOI02210914 — planning chronology and record existence",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/about-ofcom/foi/2026/june/crisis-response-protocol-criteria-and-internal-assessment-methodology.pdf?v=419823"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-crisisoperation",
        "question": "What is the issued crisis-code commencement, and what happens in a worked activation?",
        "why": "Statement, laid draft and SeptemberNCII commencement are distinct. Actual notice, criteria, deployment, records and correction results decide how these powers operate.",
        "evidence": "Issued crisis amendment and commencement; s175direction/notice; provider decision log, analysis, appeals and correction outcomes",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "ofcom",
          "w31-fa-secretary",
          "w31-fa-providers",
          "w31-fa-protocol",
          "w31-fa-notice",
          "w31-fa-analysis"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Ofcom crisis response protocol — June 2026 statement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/protecting-children/illegal-harms/crisis-response-protocol-online-safety-additional-safety-measures.pdf?v=419248"
          },
          {
            "title": "Online Safety Act 2023 as enacted",
            "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/pdfs/ukpga_20230050_en.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Draft amendments to children user-to-user code",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services/draft-amendments-to-the-protection-of-children-code-of-practice-for-user-to-user-services"
          },
          {
            "title": "HCWS124 — ministerial laying statement",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2026-06-18/hcws124"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom regulatory index — issued/not-in-force labels",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/online-safety-regulatory-documents"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ofcom NCII enforcement programme — distinct commencement",
            "url": "https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/Enforcement-programme-into-measures-being-taken-by-services-to-prevent-users-from-encountering-or-sharing-non-consensual-intimate-imagery-NCII"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-divergentletters",
        "question": "What happened after the Statewatch-endorsed safeguards letter?",
        "why": "A signatory and requested remedy are established; recipient response, actual correction and legal allegations are not independently verified. Common date with DSIT meeting is not a link.",
        "evidence": "Acknowledgment, substantive response, case-specific appeal/restoration record or policy amendment",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w31-fa-statewatch",
          "w31-fa-swletter",
          "ofcom"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "ORG letter to Ofcom and technology companies — Statewatch signatory",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/letter_to_ofcom_tech_cos_palestine_action.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Statewatch published OSA letter — August2025 date and account",
            "url": "https://statewatch.org/news/2025/august/uk-authorities-must-clarify-whether-online-safety-act-will-lead-to-palestine-protest-censorship/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w31-fa-l-dffterms",
        "question": "What agreement and court record substantiate the Liberty grant and challenge?",
        "why": "r32 now includes13March2025 complaint and7April2025 procedural disclosure judgment. The complaint predates the identifiedJune2026grant; grant agreement/payment, original pleadings and merits remain open.",
        "evidence": "Grant agreement, recipient recognition/payment record, pleading and public judicial disposition",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "oak",
          "w31-fa-dff",
          "w31-fa-liberty",
          "w31-fa-tcn"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF reported Liberty TCN grant and ongoing challenge",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/uk-government-forcing-apple-to-break-encryption/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oak annual report · PDF p38",
            "url": "https://oakfnd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Annual-report-2025-14_4.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-dffterms",
        "question": "What legal force and safeguards attach to Peer Group selections?",
        "why": "Reported delegated selection is real enough to distinguish from staff-only decisions, but reserved institutional and contracting powers remain unspecified.",
        "evidence": "Signed Terms of Reference/conflict policy; March2026 adoption resolution; grant execution/payment policy",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w31-fa-dff",
          "w32-gdi-peer",
          "w32-gdi-dffboard"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DFF Community Peer Group: current public process",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/community-peer-group/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF one-year retrospective and reported March 2026 board adoption",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/one-year-of-community-led-grant-decision-making-how-its-going-so-far/"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-pleadings",
        "question": "Which later public pleading or judgment settles the TCN claim and funding scope?",
        "why": "The acquired2025 procedural ruling confirms chronology and limited disclosure outcome, not a merits ruling or exact grant-funded work.",
        "evidence": "Original public complaint and later disposition; DFF grant agreement/work allocation",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w31-fa-liberty",
          "w32-gdi-pi",
          "w32-gdi-complaint"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Liberty/Privacy International complaint announcement, 13 March 2025",
            "url": "https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/uk-governments-secret-apple-data-access-order-challenged-by-liberty-and-privacy-international/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Apple v Home Secretary: public procedural judgment [2025] UKIPTrib 1",
            "url": "https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Apple-v-Secretary-of-State-for-the-Home-Department.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "DFF August2026 grant announcement — June round",
            "url": "https://digitalfreedomfund.org/blog/dff-funds-16-new-legal-actions-for-digital-rights-2026-mid-year-update-on-new-grants/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-gdiagreements",
        "question": "Which licence connects GDI classification changes to recipient obligations?",
        "why": "Historical appeal and Oracle/IAS distribution are described, but correction delivery, recipient acknowledgement and actual restoration remain separate missing steps.",
        "evidence": "Dated ratings-review policy/form; executed licence/update/deletion annex; resolved appeal and recipient instruction/acknowledgement; IAS versioned migration specification",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w32-gdi-gdi",
          "w32-gdi-ratingreview",
          "w32-gdi-buyers",
          "w32-gdi-iasproduct"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Advertising EOL Frequently Asked Questions",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-advertising-end-of-life-faqs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "IAS Enhancements to Context Control Avoidance",
            "url": "https://integralads.com/news/ias-enhancements-to-context-control-avoidance/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-fcdoassets",
        "question": "What did the FCDO GDI award permit the funded assets to become?",
        "why": "Outside-US funded activity, financial disclosure and commercial licensing coexist without an asset/reuse bridge. A geographic remit is not a demonstrated universal downstream-use prohibition.",
        "evidence": "Executed award/variations, deliverable and financial schedules, performance returns, acceptance/publication/IP and reuse terms",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w32-gdi-fcdo",
          "w32-gdi-cdmd",
          "w32-gdi-gdi"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Global Disinformation Index: written answer 149420",
            "url": "https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-02-21/149420/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme Summary 2022 to 2023",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6773f1b34961c1185ea21b39/Counter_Disinformation_and_Media_Development_Programme_Summary_2022_to_2023.odt"
          },
          {
            "title": "FCDO spending over GBP 25,000 for September 2022",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/671a4c7af7c956b7d065a47b/FCDO_spend_25k_September_2022.csv"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Oracle Contextual Intelligence Segment Guide",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/oracle-contextual-intelligence-segment-guide.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-gdiidentity",
        "question": "Which agreement identifies the legal recipient and rights in GDI research assets?",
        "why": "German contribution, UK controller identity and GDI-branded output statements do not establish corporate ownership or transfer of funded background/results into commercial products.",
        "evidence": "Grant accession/payment record; corporate relationship; consortium background/results/exploitation and IP schedules; any named commercial licence",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w32-gdi-gdide",
          "w32-gdi-gdiuk",
          "w32-gdi-gdi",
          "w32-gdi-ai4trust"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST project 101070190 fact sheet",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190"
          },
          {
            "title": "Privacy Policy",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/privacy/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Clare Melford, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, GDI: written evidence FON0071",
            "url": "https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/130306/html/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-decisionrules",
        "question": "Who approves AI4TRUST labels, aggregate thresholds and correction/override rules?",
        "why": "Sampling inputs and the reported model architecture are visible; category boundaries, approved thresholds, human override and distribution responsibilities remain not obtained. Component F1 cannot fill that gap.",
        "evidence": "GDI annotation codebook; final tool/warning-system release080166e529e5a48d; evaluation report080166e529e59930; approved thresholds and reviewer/recipient procedures",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w32-gdi-seeds",
          "w32-gdi-warning",
          "w32-gdi-validation",
          "w32-gdi-evaluation"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "D2.1 Design of the methodological toolbox",
            "url": "https://ai4trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/D2.1-Design-of-the-Methodological-Toolbox.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST periodic reporting, period 2",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/reporting"
          },
          {
            "title": "AI4TRUST public results index: selected final deliverables",
            "url": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070190/results"
          },
          {
            "title": "Final release of disinformation detection tools and warning system: unavailable document",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e529e5a48d"
          },
          {
            "title": "Evaluation and impact assessment report: unavailable document",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?appId=PPGMS&documentIds=080166e529e59930"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w32-gdi-l-researchaccess",
        "question": "What original GDI application/refusal and delivery record identifies its actual access channel?",
        "why": "r33 adds adopted general rules, AliExpress commitments, appointment and audit evidence. These do not establish GDI qualification, the paragraph governing its reported2024 refusal or delivered data; generic legal access is no longer an not obtained gap.",
        "evidence": "Dated GDI application, recipient/DSC response and cure exchange, applicant-matched reasoned request or actual fulfilment record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w32-gdi-gdi",
          "w32-gdi-accessrequests",
          "w32-gdi-platforms"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Very Large Online Platforms decide what counts as systemic risk research. That's self-regulation failing.",
            "url": "https://www.disinformationindex.org/blog/2026-04-20-very-large-online-platforms-decide-what-counts-as-systemic-risk-research-thats-self-regulation-failing/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Digital Services Act 2022/2065 — Articles40 and22",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "Delegated Regulation2025/2050 — research-data access",
            "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2025/2050/oj/eng"
          },
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w33-con-l-trusteeoutput",
        "question": "What did Ankura actually report and what did the Commission do?",
        "why": "Approved appointment and required reporting do not establish submitted work, accepted findings or access performance.",
        "evidence": "Approved mandate/workplan; first interim report receipt/nonconfidential report; B.V.7 QA annex and Commission response",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w33-con-ankura",
          "w33-con-trustreport",
          "w33-con-ali"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "C(2025)3982 final — AliExpress Article71 decision and annex",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124718"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission notice — Ankura monitoring-trustee approval",
            "url": "https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/124727"
          },
          {
            "title": "Commission supervision index — AliExpress entry",
            "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w33-con-l-applicationpair",
        "question": "Can a tracked application be paired with its dated platform response and usable delivery?",
        "why": "FTI validity conclusions and organiser labels cannot be compared without matching identity, period, paragraph and submitted information.",
        "evidence": "Consented redacted application-response-cure/outcome pair and tracker coding record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w33-con-tracker",
          "w33-con-aliopen",
          "w33-con-appcohort"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "DSA40 Tracker Insights —8September2026 snapshot",
            "url": "https://dsa40collaboratory.eu/tracker-insights/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "FTI AliExpress2024/25 Article37 audit — selected40(12) evidence",
            "url": "https://files.alicdn.com/tpsservice/118cffe16ea7541786b8e8ccf9365ce6.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w33-con-l-researchfunding",
        "question": "What project award and host funding instruments specify rights and money?",
        "why": "Mercator project credit differs from BMFTR/Berlin institute support; no common grant, amount, payment or approval right acquired.",
        "evidence": "Award agreement, recipient allocation/recognition and any reporting/editorial/data-access conditions",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w33-con-mercator",
          "w33-con-collab",
          "w33-con-weizenbaum"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "Weizenbaum Policy Paper14 — Data Access, September2025",
            "url": "https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/media/Publikationen/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper/Weizenbaum_Policy_Paper_14.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w33-con-l-evaluationresult",
        "question": "Which CDDP evaluation and Treasury decision show actual acceptance or continued funding?",
        "why": "Commissioned criteria and price now read; final output, agreed KPIs, acceptance certificate and exercised funding gate remain distinct gaps.",
        "evidence": "Initial KPI agreement, feasibility/interim/final report, HMT gateway minute, milestone acceptance and payment record",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w16-supp-cddp",
          "w33-con-evalcontract",
          "w33-con-fundgate"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "Official CDDP FOI release: inventory and withholding",
            "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-18509-the-counter-disinformation-data-project/response-the-counter-disinformation-data-project"
          },
          {
            "title": "Treasury Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 — CDDP entry",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6178283be90e07198108160d/Shared_Outcomes_Fund_Round_2_-_Pilot_Project_Summaries_-_FINAL.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w33-con-l-osdioutput",
        "question": "What original OSDI assurance/product reports and advice dispositions were delivered?",
        "why": "PA programme assurance, PUBLIC prototype and later STCF method reuse are distinct. No original PA report, sandbox framework or acceptance certificate acquired.",
        "evidence": "PA inception/final report and management response; original prototype evaluation instruments; advisory minutes/shortlisting matrix",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w33-con-osdi",
          "pa-consulting",
          "w33-con-sandbox",
          "w33-con-expertgroup"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "OSDI appoints external evaluator PA Consulting",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/09/23/working-with-an-independent-evaluator/"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC G-Cloud14 service definition — OSDI sandbox case study",
            "url": "https://assets.applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk/g-cloud-14/documents/706515/179204743065460-service-definition-document-2024-05-03-1318.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC evaluation of Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6707a7a3e84ae1fd8592f125/safety_tech_challenge_fund_2_evaluation.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "CDEI OSDI expert-group account —2July2021",
            "url": "https://onlinesafetydata.blog.gov.uk/2021/07/02/cdei-convenes-expert-group-to-advise-on-online-safety-data-initiative-project/"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "w33-con-l-publiccontract",
        "question": "Which executed contract identifies PUBLIC's actual CDDP work?",
        "why": "Self-reported participation and redacted approved-subcontractor field permit several arrangements; OSDI consortium does not prove the CDDP subcontract.",
        "evidence": "Unredacted102548 approval, executed statement of work/subcontract and accepted allocated deliverable",
        "status": "parked",
        "people": [
          "w33-con-public",
          "w16-supp-cddp",
          "w33-con-subapproval"
        ],
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "CDDP FOI original bundle: selected business/contract/IP passages",
            "url": "https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66803d6baec8650b10090192/FOI2023-18509_Document_bundle.pdf"
          },
          {
            "title": "PUBLIC reports participation in CDDP delivery",
            "url": "https://www.public.io/blog-post/better-collaboration-bigger-impact-how-data-sharing-accelerates-innovation"
          }
        ],
        "answer": ""
      }
    ],
    "hypotheses": [
      {
        "id": "h-common-direction",
        "title": "Common direction across campaigns",
        "statement": "A common funding or governance centre sets consequential decisions across the separate AI, age-policy and payment campaigns. This remains an attributed investigation hypothesis; the acquired cross-sector record does not establish it.",
        "status": "open",
        "supports": [
          "w2-fli-e-lightcone25",
          "w2-fli-ed-board-lightcone",
          "w1-icmec-e-paypal",
          "i05"
        ],
        "challenges": [
          "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative",
          "w1-australia-edge-responses-reported",
          "w1-creator-e-output-frame"
        ],
        "assumptions": [
          "Shared resources must carry decision rights and connect to the particular outputs; identity overlap alone is insufficient."
        ],
        "predictions": [
          "A common instruction, approval schedule or matched restricted grant should connect otherwise separate campaign decisions."
        ],
        "next_test": "Compare named output instructions and project-specific allocations. New local budget rights, credited Oak input, coalition participation rules and legislative uptake do not establish a common direction across the separate campaigns.",
        "alternative": "Multiple autonomous initiatives use shared funders, talent and infrastructure; some local contracts convey specific approval rights."
      },
      {
        "id": "h-aligned-selection",
        "title": "Aligned selection and voluntary collaboration",
        "statement": "Some apparent coordination arises through selecting aligned communicators and voluntary collaboration. The record supports this as an operating model in parts of the creator ecosystem, alongside separately specified production contracts.",
        "status": "supported",
        "supports": [
          "n08",
          "w1-creator-e-output-fli",
          "w1-creator-e-output-frame",
          "w1-creator-e-rational-partnership"
        ],
        "challenges": [
          "w1-creator-e-pf-terms",
          "e100"
        ],
        "assumptions": [
          "Public independence statements may be incomplete; actual agreements can change this assessment."
        ],
        "predictions": [
          "Grant letters permit editorial choice while selection criteria and renewal incentives constrain participation upstream."
        ],
        "next_test": "Compare a specific Future Tense grant letter and Frame placement agreement with the published output and revision history.",
        "alternative": "A named advertiser or donor exercises contract-specific approval beyond selection."
      },
      {
        "id": "h-gateway-bargaining",
        "title": "Power through conditional access",
        "statement": "Providers of production money, payment access or technical interfaces can shape choices through eligibility and approval conditions. Exercised constraints are reported in the games-payment case; creator terms and proposed age interfaces show distinct capacities, not one universal command.",
        "status": "supported",
        "supports": [
          "w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection",
          "w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice",
          "w1-creator-e-pf-terms",
          "i11",
          "i13",
          "w3-oak-e-budget-permission",
          "w3-oak-e-underspend",
          "w3-icmec-e-coalition",
          "w9-assure-e-fund-google-route",
          "w9-assure-e-fund-google-conditions",
          "w9-assure-e-fund-schmidt-renewal",
          "w10-duty-e-draft-minister",
          "w10-duty-e-esafety-provider",
          "w10-duty-e-minister-research",
          "w30-class-e-match-admission",
          "w30-class-e-stripe-policy"
        ],
        "challenges": [
          "n42",
          "w1-creator-e-output-frame"
        ],
        "assumptions": [
          "Alternatives and switching costs determine practical leverage; no numerical bargaining power is inferred."
        ],
        "predictions": [
          "The decision trail identifies eligibility terms, a rejected alternative and a consequence tied to access, even without a shared ideological organiser."
        ],
        "next_test": "Obtain Valve's dated processor/acquirer instruction chain and the exact governing account terms; distinguish network rule from downstream interpretation.",
        "alternative": "An upstream actor gave a campaign-specific directive; the refusal was not merely distributed risk interpretation.",
        "assessment_update": "The exposure draft specifies prospective ministerial and Commissioner decision points, reasonable-belief triggers and approval-rule dependencies. These are proposed authority, not exercised gates, payments or proof of universal identification."
      },
      {
        "id": "h-contested-policy",
        "title": "Contested institutional decisions",
        "statement": "Policy and evaluation outcomes are negotiated among actors with different interests. The acquired California analyses and Australian minutes document revisions, objections and differentiated review access; influence is neither absent nor uniformly successful.",
        "status": "supported",
        "supports": [
          "w1-icmec-e-wicks-scope",
          "w1-icmec-e-mpa",
          "w1-icmec-e-wicks-alternative",
          "w1-australia-edge-march-objections",
          "w1-australia-edge-responses-reported",
          "w3-5r-e-kidron-portantino",
          "w3-5r-e-prose-uptake",
          "w3-icmec-e-uptake",
          "w9-assure-e-sb813-version-change",
          "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary",
          "w9-assure-e-g7-privacy",
          "w9-assure-e-g7-premarket",
          "w10-duty-e-reset-review",
          "w10-duty-e-draft-adult",
          "w10-duty-e-research-narrower",
          "w31-fa-e-declinemonetization",
          "w31-fa-e-declineformalngo",
          "w31-fa-e-declinecentral"
        ],
        "challenges": [
          "w1-australia-edge-unequal-draft-access",
          "w1-australia-edge-corby-review-commitment"
        ],
        "assumptions": [
          "A minuted response need not establish adequate implementation or equal decision rights."
        ],
        "predictions": [
          "Versioned drafts and signoffs show who won a disputed choice and whether safeguards constrained substantive work."
        ],
        "next_test": "Compare the operative Australian role restriction with assignment and review signoffs; obtain the MPA memorandum explicitly referenced by the California committee.",
        "alternative": "Nominal consultation leaves the substantive design controlled by an actor insulated from challenge.",
        "assessment_update": "Duty-care wave adds explicit recipient quotation of Reset, but also university-only eligibility narrower than its third-sector request and a limited private-adult exception. Input is documented; universal NGO access and final clause control are not."
      },
      {
        "id": "w4-fin-h-recipient-direction",
        "statement": "A plausible Australian explanation is that Westpac financed technical capacity and the recipient chose programme and policy outputs under its own governance, subject to grant terms not yet recovered. The dated end of US control does not itself establish freedom from bank conditions.",
        "status": "open",
        "supports": [
          "w3-icmec-e-grant",
          "w4-fin-e-control-ended",
          "w4-lh-e-owner"
        ],
        "challenges": [],
        "title": "Recipient direction within bank-supported capacity",
        "next_test": "Read actual membership/adoption resolutions, board approval/conflict records and signed grant conditions; compare them with published charter powers. Funding, self-governance and advisory access do not alone establish exercised donor direction.",
        "alternative": "The bank or another sponsor reserved and exercised a specific approval or policy condition; general support or vendor delivery decisions cannot establish that intervention.",
        "assumptions": [
          "Loss of US sole membership/control concerns that relationship, not the entire funding or governance network.",
          "Technical delivery decisions and public policy approval are different responsibilities."
        ]
      }
    ],
    "decision_models": [
      {
        "id": "g-valve-payment-choice",
        "title": "The choice Valve describes",
        "kind": "bargaining",
        "summary": "Qualitative reconstruction of Valve's attributed July–August 2025 account. Upstream communications and the full option set are not recovered; this is not a solved or scored game.",
        "players": [
          {
            "node_id": "steam",
            "objective": "Retain payment methods while operating the catalogue, as Valve states.",
            "basis": "July17 and August1 company replies published by recipient GamingOnLinux.",
            "constraints": [
              "Its proposed legality-based catalogue response was reportedly rejected."
            ],
            "outside_options": [
              "Alternative providers or routes were not established in the acquired record."
            ],
            "moves": [
              "Respond that legal content should remain permitted.",
              "Retire affected games to retain payment methods."
            ]
          },
          {
            "node_id": "w1-payments-steam-processors",
            "objective": "Apply the restrictions attributed to them by Valve; internal objectives remain unobserved.",
            "basis": "Only Valve's account of unnamed processors/acquiring banks; no original instruction.",
            "constraints": [
              "Reported citation of Mastercard Rule5.12.7."
            ],
            "moves": [
              "Reject Valve's suggested response, according to Valve."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "sequence": [
          "Valve reports receiving objections through processors/acquiring banks.",
          "Valve says it offered a legality-based response.",
          "It says processors rejected that response and cited a network brand-risk rule.",
          "Valve publicly attributes catalogue retirements to preserving payment methods."
        ],
        "scenarios": [
          {
            "label": "Downstream risk interpretation",
            "assumptions": [
              "Processors apply general account/network terms without a title-specific network command."
            ],
            "implications": [
              "Account-level reasoning and appeal determine the practical decision."
            ],
            "signals": [
              "Original bank notice cites its own interpretation or risk assessment."
            ]
          },
          {
            "label": "Specific upstream instruction",
            "assumptions": [
              "A network or other upstream party required the relevant restriction."
            ],
            "implications": [
              "The decisive instruction predates and constrains the processors' choice."
            ],
            "signals": [
              "Dated upstream notice identifies the scope and required action."
            ]
          }
        ],
        "depends_on": [
          "edges:w1-payments-edge-steam-processor-objection",
          "edges:w1-payments-edge-mastercard-relay-attribution",
          "edges:w1-payments-edge-steam-retirement-choice",
          "edges:n42"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "profileNotes": [
      {
        "id": "profile-max-winga-followup",
        "title": "Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026</h1>\n<p>Current official role: ControlAI Creator Outreach &amp; Systems Lead. Earlier role descriptions include communications/partnerships and policy work. Current title is from the employer, not inferred from a stale social profile.\n<a href=\"https://controlai.org/about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/about</a></p>\n<p>Historical professional biography: the AI Treaty signatory list identifies him as a Conjecture AI Research Engineer and Engineering Physics2024, University of Illinois. His university affiliation is independently corroborated by a Selvin Lab alumni listing and a2022 university-hosted course presentation. These records do not establish exact Conjecture employment dates.\n<a href=\"https://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign</a>\n<a href=\"https://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/</a>\n<a href=\"https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys398dlp/sp2022/documents/group4_final_powerpoint.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys398dlp/sp2022/documents/group4_final_powerpoint.pdf</a></p>\n<p>His own Substack About page expresses a strong extinction-risk worldview and describes AI safety as his life's commitment. This is evidence of his public position, not access to private motives or proof of the technical claims.\n<a href=\"https://maxwinga.substack.com/about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://maxwinga.substack.com/about</a></p>\n<p>In ControlAI's July16 2025 podcast, around46:10, he explains that he moved away from technical safety research because he expects dangerous systems before adequate technical safeguards and sees government intervention as necessary. He also directs viewers toward tools for contacting lawmakers. These statements establish his rationale and an explicit mobilization mechanism.\n<a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku</a></p>\n<p>Frame lists him among past mentors and describes partnerships with SciShow and Rational Animations. ControlAI's own May3 2025 announcement corroborates the Rational Animations collaboration. SciShow's October31 2025 video description identifies ControlAI and directs viewers toward its lawmaker-contact tools. Specific payment and contract terms are unobserved.\n<a href=\"https://www.framefellowship.com/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.framefellowship.com/</a>\n<a href=\"https://controlai.news/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.news/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just</a>\n<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90C3XVjUMqE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90C3XVjUMqE</a></p>\n<p>His February17 2026 essay 'You're an AI Expert – Not an Influencer' discusses credibility, professional roles, avoiding distracting partisan commentary and protecting a broadly repeatable AI-risk message. Original LessWrong and GreaterWrong fetches failed; the text was inspected in its published audio/transcript distribution. Do not claim original-page access.\n<a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer</a>\n<a href=\"https://podscan.fm/podcasts/lesswrong-curated-amp-popular/episodes/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://podscan.fm/podcasts/lesswrong-curated-amp-popular/episodes/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga-1</a>\n<a href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga/id1630783021?i=1000750579675\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga/id1630783021?i=1000750579675</a></p>\n<p>A recent search-indexed social mirror attributes a sponsorship defense to Winga: paid work disclosed, creators selected for existing concern, scripting suggestions with final editorial say retained by creators. The original X status URL/date were not recovered. Direct mirror open returned a different cached snapshot. Retain as unverified mirror-attributed response, not audited disclosure or a verified contract. This is material favorable context for future reporting.\n<a href=\"https://twstalker.com/maxwinga\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://twstalker.com/maxwinga</a></p>\n<p>Interpretation: Winga is a professional bridge between technical AI-safety networks, NGO advocacy, creator partnerships and public mobilization. No donor role, legal control, budget size, individual compensation, contract-signing authority or Conjecture-to-ControlAI money transfer was established. His work is relevant to how messages are produced and distributed, while the underlying financial control remains a separate question.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026 \n Current official role: ControlAI Creator Outreach & Systems Lead. Earlier role descriptions include communications/partnerships and policy work. Current title is from the employer, not inferred from a stale social profile.\n https://controlai.org/about  \n Historical professional biography: the AI Treaty signatory list identifies him as a Conjecture AI Research Engineer and Engineering Physics2024, University of Illinois. His university affiliation is independently corroborated by a Selvin Lab alumni listing and a2022 university-hosted course presentation. These records do not establish exact Conjecture employment dates.\n https://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign \n https://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/ \n https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys398dlp/sp2022/documents/group4_final_powerpoint.pdf  \n His own Substack About page expresses a strong extinction-risk worldview and describes AI safety as his life's commitment. This is evidence of his public position, not access to private motives or proof of the technical claims.\n https://maxwinga.substack.com/about  \n In ControlAI's July16 2025 podcast, around46:10, he explains that he moved away from technical safety research because he expects dangerous systems before adequate technical safeguards and sees government intervention as necessary. He also directs viewers toward tools for contacting lawmakers. These statements establish his rationale and an explicit mobilization mechanism.\n https://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku  \n Frame lists him among past mentors and describes partnerships with SciShow and Rational Animations. ControlAI's own May3 2025 announcement corroborates the Rational Animations collaboration. SciShow's October31 2025 video description identifies ControlAI and directs viewers toward its lawmaker-contact tools. Specific payment and contract terms are unobserved.\n https://www.framefellowship.com/ \n https://controlai.news/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just \n https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90C3XVjUMqE  \n His February17 2026 essay 'You're an AI Expert – Not an Influencer' discusses credibility, professional roles, avoiding distracting partisan commentary and protecting a broadly repeatable AI-risk message. Original LessWrong and GreaterWrong fetches failed; the text was inspected in its published audio/transcript distribution. Do not claim original-page access.\n https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer \n https://podscan.fm/podcasts/lesswrong-curated-amp-popular/episodes/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga-1 \n https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga/id1630783021?i=1000750579675  \n A recent search-indexed social mirror attributes a sponsorship defense to Winga: paid work disclosed, creators selected for existing concern, scripting suggestions with final editorial say retained by creators. The original X status URL/date were not recovered. Direct mirror open returned a different cached snapshot. Retain as unverified mirror-attributed response, not audited disclosure or a verified contract. This is material favorable context for future reporting.\n https://twstalker.com/maxwinga  \n Interpretation: Winga is a professional bridge between technical AI-safety networks, NGO advocacy, creator partnerships and public mobilization. No donor role, legal control, budget size, individual compensation, contract-signing authority or Conjecture-to-ControlAI money transfer was established. His work is relevant to how messages are produced and distributed, while the underlying financial control remains a separate question. \n",
        "path": "max-winga-followup.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Max Winga profile follow-up — 5 September 2026\n\nCurrent official role: ControlAI Creator Outreach & Systems Lead. Earlier role descriptions include communications/partnerships and policy work. Current title is from the employer, not inferred from a stale social profile.\nhttps://controlai.org/about\n\nHistorical professional biography: the AI Treaty signatory list identifies him as a Conjecture AI Research Engineer and Engineering Physics2024, University of Illinois. His university affiliation is independently corroborated by a Selvin Lab alumni listing and a2022 university-hosted course presentation. These records do not establish exact Conjecture employment dates.\nhttps://aitreaty.org/?scroll=sign\nhttps://selvinlab.physics.illinois.edu/people-2/\nhttps://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys398dlp/sp2022/documents/group4_final_powerpoint.pdf\n\nHis own Substack About page expresses a strong extinction-risk worldview and describes AI safety as his life's commitment. This is evidence of his public position, not access to private motives or proof of the technical claims.\nhttps://maxwinga.substack.com/about\n\nIn ControlAI's July16 2025 podcast, around46:10, he explains that he moved away from technical safety research because he expects dangerous systems before adequate technical safeguards and sees government intervention as necessary. He also directs viewers toward tools for contacting lawmakers. These statements establish his rationale and an explicit mobilization mechanism.\nhttps://blog.controlai.org/p/intro-to-ai-security-with-dr-waku\n\nFrame lists him among past mentors and describes partnerships with SciShow and Rational Animations. ControlAI's own May3 2025 announcement corroborates the Rational Animations collaboration. SciShow's October31 2025 video description identifies ControlAI and directs viewers toward its lawmaker-contact tools. Specific payment and contract terms are unobserved.\nhttps://www.framefellowship.com/\nhttps://controlai.news/p/watch-now-what-happens-if-ai-just\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90C3XVjUMqE\n\nHis February17 2026 essay 'You're an AI Expert – Not an Influencer' discusses credibility, professional roles, avoiding distracting partisan commentary and protecting a broadly repeatable AI-risk message. Original LessWrong and GreaterWrong fetches failed; the text was inspected in its published audio/transcript distribution. Do not claim original-page access.\nhttps://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer\nhttps://podscan.fm/podcasts/lesswrong-curated-amp-popular/episodes/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga-1\nhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer-by-max-winga/id1630783021?i=1000750579675\n\nA recent search-indexed social mirror attributes a sponsorship defense to Winga: paid work disclosed, creators selected for existing concern, scripting suggestions with final editorial say retained by creators. The original X status URL/date were not recovered. Direct mirror open returned a different cached snapshot. Retain as unverified mirror-attributed response, not audited disclosure or a verified contract. This is material favorable context for future reporting.\nhttps://twstalker.com/maxwinga\n\nInterpretation: Winga is a professional bridge between technical AI-safety networks, NGO advocacy, creator partnerships and public mobilization. No donor role, legal control, budget size, individual compensation, contract-signing authority or Conjecture-to-ControlAI money transfer was established. His work is relevant to how messages are produced and distributed, while the underlying financial control remains a separate question.\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-tegmark-lightcone-followup",
        "title": "Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026</h1>\n<p>Tegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI's current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization's current position, not an independently established technical conclusion or a ban on all AI.\n<a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/person/max-tegmark/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/person/max-tegmark/</a>\n<a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/our-position-on-ai/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/our-position-on-ai/</a></p>\n<p>Lightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered.\n<a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259</a>\n<a href=\"https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation</a></p>\n<p>Impala's separate Mission Statement field reproduces:\n“TO SUPPORTING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF THE FUTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION, PRIMARILY VIA GRANTMAKING.”\nThis is an aggregator's tax-data reproduction, not a directly recovered charter. It names Future of Life FOUNDATION (FLF, EIN88-0926067). Impala has an AI-generated summary nearby and inconsistent fiscal-year labels; do not rely on its summary for new transaction amounts.\n<a href=\"https://impala.digital/public/profiles/92-0636259/overview\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://impala.digital/public/profiles/92-0636259/overview</a></p>\n<p>FLI's primary2022 return ScheduleA PartVI says its articles were amended December14 2022 to become a supporting organization to FLF. ScheduleO, PDFp51, reproduces amended Article3, limiting its operation to supporting FLF's purposes within charitable rules. This is more than a shared-name association, but the group's ScheduleR cross-control fields do not justify a simple unverified parent/subsidiary tree.\n<a href=\"https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf</a></p>\n<p>FLI's primary2024 ScheduleR identifies Lightcone as a related grantmaker and records$21.05m received from it. These records support actual affiliation and financial movements while leaving specific grant decision rights and all inter-entity contracts unresolved.\n<a href=\"https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf</a></p>\n<p>FLF's own site describes actively creating organizations and initiatives, recruiting founders, running fellowships and commissioning prototypes. It focuses on AI tools for collective human agency; current priorities address AI-supported reasoning, collaboration and reliable knowledge. Its approach is selective/proactive rather than an open grants process. This is concrete self-described activity, not demonstrated effectiveness.\n<a href=\"https://flf.org/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://flf.org/</a></p>\n<p>A lower-readiness lead: philanthropy.org's FY2022 transcription lists a$10m Lightcone grant to SVCF; Impala labels a matching amount2023. The underlying alternate PDF failed retrieval. Do not connect this to SVCF's2023 CAIS grant without donor-account or onward-allocation evidence.\n<a href=\"https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/990.pdf?fy=2022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/990.pdf?fy=2022</a></p>\n<p>Tegmark's February2 2026 Canadian parliamentary appearance supplies direct evidence of advocacy for mandatory safety testing while favoring beneficial AI tools. Other empirical claims in that testimony were not validated by this follow-up; testimony proves what a witness argued, not the accuracy of every assertion.\n<a href=\"https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/451/ETHI/Evidence/EV13876654/ETHIEV25-E.PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/451/ETHI/Evidence/EV13876654/ETHIEV25-E.PDF</a></p>\n<p>Interpretation: distinguish the breadth of a nonprofit's short mission from its current programs, legal relationships, and exercised grantmaking discretion. The reporting focus is who decides which approaches get resources. A broad mandate or ominous-sounding name does not by itself establish improper conduct.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026 \n Tegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI's current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization's current position, not an independently established technical conclusion or a ban on all AI.\n https://futureoflife.org/person/max-tegmark/ \n https://futureoflife.org/our-position-on-ai/  \n Lightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered.\n https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259 \n https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation  \n Impala's separate Mission Statement field reproduces:\n“TO SUPPORTING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF THE FUTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION, PRIMARILY VIA GRANTMAKING.”\nThis is an aggregator's tax-data reproduction, not a directly recovered charter. It names Future of Life FOUNDATION (FLF, EIN88-0926067). Impala has an AI-generated summary nearby and inconsistent fiscal-year labels; do not rely on its summary for new transaction amounts.\n https://impala.digital/public/profiles/92-0636259/overview  \n FLI's primary2022 return ScheduleA PartVI says its articles were amended December14 2022 to become a supporting organization to FLF. ScheduleO, PDFp51, reproduces amended Article3, limiting its operation to supporting FLF's purposes within charitable rules. This is more than a shared-name association, but the group's ScheduleR cross-control fields do not justify a simple unverified parent/subsidiary tree.\n https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf  \n FLI's primary2024 ScheduleR identifies Lightcone as a related grantmaker and records$21.05m received from it. These records support actual affiliation and financial movements while leaving specific grant decision rights and all inter-entity contracts unresolved.\n https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf  \n FLF's own site describes actively creating organizations and initiatives, recruiting founders, running fellowships and commissioning prototypes. It focuses on AI tools for collective human agency; current priorities address AI-supported reasoning, collaboration and reliable knowledge. Its approach is selective/proactive rather than an open grants process. This is concrete self-described activity, not demonstrated effectiveness.\n https://flf.org/  \n A lower-readiness lead: philanthropy.org's FY2022 transcription lists a$10m Lightcone grant to SVCF; Impala labels a matching amount2023. The underlying alternate PDF failed retrieval. Do not connect this to SVCF's2023 CAIS grant without donor-account or onward-allocation evidence.\n https://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/990.pdf?fy=2022  \n Tegmark's February2 2026 Canadian parliamentary appearance supplies direct evidence of advocacy for mandatory safety testing while favoring beneficial AI tools. Other empirical claims in that testimony were not validated by this follow-up; testimony proves what a witness argued, not the accuracy of every assertion.\n https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/451/ETHI/Evidence/EV13876654/ETHIEV25-E.PDF  \n Interpretation: distinguish the breadth of a nonprofit's short mission from its current programs, legal relationships, and exercised grantmaking discretion. The reporting focus is who decides which approaches get resources. A broad mandate or ominous-sounding name does not by itself establish improper conduct. \n",
        "path": "tegmark-lightcone-followup.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Tegmark and Lightcone follow-up — 5 September 2026\n\nTegmark is currently identified as FLI founder and chair, and its biography describes ongoing AI research. FLI's current published AI position calls for a frontier-experiment pause and an ASI moratorium of at least15years. The page bears a2024 publication stamp but does not establish when that specific wording was adopted. Treat this as the organization's current position, not an independently established technical conclusion or a ban on all AI.\nhttps://futureoflife.org/person/max-tegmark/\nhttps://futureoflife.org/our-position-on-ai/\n\nLightcone Foundation is the Nevada entity EIN92-0636259, formed2022 in the FY2022 IRS-derived profile; tax-exempt ruling June2023. The FY2024 ProPublica extraction reports$174,320,788 net assets, with Tegmark board president, Aguirre secretary and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark treasurer. It is a grantmaking/reserve affiliate, not established as Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong. Neither the original Lightcone charter nor complete current filing was recovered.\nhttps://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259\nhttps://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/lightcone-foundation\n\nImpala's separate Mission Statement field reproduces:\n“TO SUPPORTING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF THE FUTURE OF LIFE FOUNDATION, PRIMARILY VIA GRANTMAKING.”\nThis is an aggregator's tax-data reproduction, not a directly recovered charter. It names Future of Life FOUNDATION (FLF, EIN88-0926067). Impala has an AI-generated summary nearby and inconsistent fiscal-year labels; do not rely on its summary for new transaction amounts.\nhttps://impala.digital/public/profiles/92-0636259/overview\n\nFLI's primary2022 return ScheduleA PartVI says its articles were amended December14 2022 to become a supporting organization to FLF. ScheduleO, PDFp51, reproduces amended Article3, limiting its operation to supporting FLF's purposes within charitable rules. This is more than a shared-name association, but the group's ScheduleR cross-control fields do not justify a simple unverified parent/subsidiary tree.\nhttps://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf\n\nFLI's primary2024 ScheduleR identifies Lightcone as a related grantmaker and records$21.05m received from it. These records support actual affiliation and financial movements while leaving specific grant decision rights and all inter-entity contracts unresolved.\nhttps://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf\n\nFLF's own site describes actively creating organizations and initiatives, recruiting founders, running fellowships and commissioning prototypes. It focuses on AI tools for collective human agency; current priorities address AI-supported reasoning, collaboration and reliable knowledge. Its approach is selective/proactive rather than an open grants process. This is concrete self-described activity, not demonstrated effectiveness.\nhttps://flf.org/\n\nA lower-readiness lead: philanthropy.org's FY2022 transcription lists a$10m Lightcone grant to SVCF; Impala labels a matching amount2023. The underlying alternate PDF failed retrieval. Do not connect this to SVCF's2023 CAIS grant without donor-account or onward-allocation evidence.\nhttps://philanthropy.org/990/report/920636259/990.pdf?fy=2022\n\nTegmark's February2 2026 Canadian parliamentary appearance supplies direct evidence of advocacy for mandatory safety testing while favoring beneficial AI tools. Other empirical claims in that testimony were not validated by this follow-up; testimony proves what a witness argued, not the accuracy of every assertion.\nhttps://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/451/ETHI/Evidence/EV13876654/ETHIEV25-E.PDF\n\nInterpretation: distinguish the breadth of a nonprofit's short mission from its current programs, legal relationships, and exercised grantmaking discretion. The reporting focus is who decides which approaches get resources. A broad mandate or ominous-sounding name does not by itself establish improper conduct.\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-vitalik-followup",
        "title": "Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026</h1>\n<p>Question: Why did he fund FLI, and is an AI-versus-crypto commercial strategy supported?</p>\n<p>The evidence supports a historic personal donation, stated existential-risk and decentralization concerns, and later public disagreement over methods. No evidence found in this follow-up establishes that the gift was intended to weaken an investment competitor. Publicly stated motives do not settle private motives.</p>\n<p>FLI's June2021 announcement describes a$25m multiyear existential-risk grant program enabled by Buterin/Shiba Inu support. This is a program envelope, not the total gift. FLI's current finance page calls the gift unconditional and says Buterin has no decision-making role.\n<a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/</a>\n<a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/</a></p>\n<p>CoinDesk's March13 2026 report describes unsolicited SHIB tokens and Buterin's account that FLI realized roughly$500m, far beyond his expected$10–25m. These are attributed retrospective estimates, not independently reconciled liquidation proceeds. Its headline's billion-dollar figure covers wider philanthropy, not FLI alone.\n<a href=\"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest</a></p>\n<p>Cointelegraph's March13 report, updatedMarch16 with FLI comment, describes Buterin's criticism of a turn toward political/cultural action and his concern about authoritarian, fragile outcomes. Aguirre emphasized shared aims and continuing technical work. The original X post was not readable through the web tool; the criticism is retained as attributed reporting, not direct-source access.\n<a href=\"https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation</a></p>\n<p>Buterin's own January2024 essay explores AI/crypto applications: AI agents participating in blockchain mechanisms, useful interfaces, and cryptography-supported AI. His January2025 d/acc essay connects decentralization, openness and defensive technology and discusses possible compute constraints. His November2023 essay combines concern about human disempowerment and authoritarian concentration with enthusiasm for beneficial AI.\n<a href=\"https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/01/30/cryptoai.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/01/30/cryptoai.html</a>\n<a href=\"https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/01/05/dacc2.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/01/05/dacc2.html</a>\n<a href=\"https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/11/27/techno_optimism.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/11/27/techno_optimism.html</a></p>\n<p>Interpretation: the better-supported division concerns who controls AI and how safety is pursued. Crypto interests can overlap with preferred technical infrastructure; that alone does not establish a campaign to suppress AI commercially. A historical donor edge must not be read as current endorsement or instruction.</p>\n<p>This supplement matters to article framing: any treatment of Buterin as FLI's major donor should also describe his reported objections. The original pitch, dated gift agreement and decision records would help test his account of strategic divergence. The disagreement does not establish breached restrictions on a gift FLI describes as unconditional.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026 \n Question: Why did he fund FLI, and is an AI-versus-crypto commercial strategy supported? \n The evidence supports a historic personal donation, stated existential-risk and decentralization concerns, and later public disagreement over methods. No evidence found in this follow-up establishes that the gift was intended to weaken an investment competitor. Publicly stated motives do not settle private motives. \n FLI's June2021 announcement describes a$25m multiyear existential-risk grant program enabled by Buterin/Shiba Inu support. This is a program envelope, not the total gift. FLI's current finance page calls the gift unconditional and says Buterin has no decision-making role.\n https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/ \n https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/  \n CoinDesk's March13 2026 report describes unsolicited SHIB tokens and Buterin's account that FLI realized roughly$500m, far beyond his expected$10–25m. These are attributed retrospective estimates, not independently reconciled liquidation proceeds. Its headline's billion-dollar figure covers wider philanthropy, not FLI alone.\n https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest  \n Cointelegraph's March13 report, updatedMarch16 with FLI comment, describes Buterin's criticism of a turn toward political/cultural action and his concern about authoritarian, fragile outcomes. Aguirre emphasized shared aims and continuing technical work. The original X post was not readable through the web tool; the criticism is retained as attributed reporting, not direct-source access.\n https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation  \n Buterin's own January2024 essay explores AI/crypto applications: AI agents participating in blockchain mechanisms, useful interfaces, and cryptography-supported AI. His January2025 d/acc essay connects decentralization, openness and defensive technology and discusses possible compute constraints. His November2023 essay combines concern about human disempowerment and authoritarian concentration with enthusiasm for beneficial AI.\n https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/01/30/cryptoai.html \n https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/01/05/dacc2.html \n https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/11/27/techno_optimism.html  \n Interpretation: the better-supported division concerns who controls AI and how safety is pursued. Crypto interests can overlap with preferred technical infrastructure; that alone does not establish a campaign to suppress AI commercially. A historical donor edge must not be read as current endorsement or instruction. \n This supplement matters to article framing: any treatment of Buterin as FLI's major donor should also describe his reported objections. The original pitch, dated gift agreement and decision records would help test his account of strategic divergence. The disagreement does not establish breached restrictions on a gift FLI describes as unconditional. \n",
        "path": "vitalik-followup.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Vitalik Buterin follow-up — 5 September 2026\n\nQuestion: Why did he fund FLI, and is an AI-versus-crypto commercial strategy supported?\n\nThe evidence supports a historic personal donation, stated existential-risk and decentralization concerns, and later public disagreement over methods. No evidence found in this follow-up establishes that the gift was intended to weaken an investment competitor. Publicly stated motives do not settle private motives.\n\nFLI's June2021 announcement describes a$25m multiyear existential-risk grant program enabled by Buterin/Shiba Inu support. This is a program envelope, not the total gift. FLI's current finance page calls the gift unconditional and says Buterin has no decision-making role.\nhttps://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/\nhttps://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/\n\nCoinDesk's March13 2026 report describes unsolicited SHIB tokens and Buterin's account that FLI realized roughly$500m, far beyond his expected$10–25m. These are attributed retrospective estimates, not independently reconciled liquidation proceeds. Its headline's billion-dollar figure covers wider philanthropy, not FLI alone.\nhttps://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest\n\nCointelegraph's March13 report, updatedMarch16 with FLI comment, describes Buterin's criticism of a turn toward political/cultural action and his concern about authoritarian, fragile outcomes. Aguirre emphasized shared aims and continuing technical work. The original X post was not readable through the web tool; the criticism is retained as attributed reporting, not direct-source access.\nhttps://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation\n\nButerin's own January2024 essay explores AI/crypto applications: AI agents participating in blockchain mechanisms, useful interfaces, and cryptography-supported AI. His January2025 d/acc essay connects decentralization, openness and defensive technology and discusses possible compute constraints. His November2023 essay combines concern about human disempowerment and authoritarian concentration with enthusiasm for beneficial AI.\nhttps://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/01/30/cryptoai.html\nhttps://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/01/05/dacc2.html\nhttps://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/11/27/techno_optimism.html\n\nInterpretation: the better-supported division concerns who controls AI and how safety is pursued. Crypto interests can overlap with preferred technical infrastructure; that alone does not establish a campaign to suppress AI commercially. A historical donor edge must not be read as current endorsement or instruction.\n\nThis supplement matters to article framing: any treatment of Buterin as FLI's major donor should also describe his reported objections. The original pitch, dated gift agreement and decision records would help test his account of strategic divergence. The disagreement does not establish breached restrictions on a gift FLI describes as unconditional.\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-conjecture-controlai-pathways",
        "title": "Conjecture's faction history and ControlAI's policy pathways",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Conjecture's faction history and ControlAI's policy pathways</h1>\n<p>Observed 5 September 2026. This is a factual follow-up to the Miotti/Behrens connection map. The user's phrase &quot;control injection node&quot; is a hypothesis about institutional function, not a finding of covert control.</p>\n<h2>Completed workstreams</h2>\n<p><a >Conjecture chronology and faction evidence</a>: the documented rupture is with parts of core EA, contemporaneously visible in June 2023. The reviewed e/acc connection is public disagreement. No earlier e/acc membership, departure, or investor withdrawal was established.</p>\n<p><a >Institutional uptake and current legislative status</a>: official records distinguish parliamentary acknowledgments, lodged evidence, tabled amendments and future scheduled business. No enacted provision attributable to ControlAI was established.</p>\n<p><a >Upstream funding follow-up</a>: direct donor identities and transfer conditions remain unresolved. A surfaced grantmaking entry is an application, not an award. Original US 990-EZ retrieval failed; secondary financial extraction is not treated as original-filing verification.</p>\n<h2>Published influence method</h2>\n<p>ControlAI's Direct Institutional Plan links policy drafting with persuasion across legislatures, government, media and civil society. Its current funding pitch describes sales-style measurement: briefings, signed endorsements, then public statements after briefings. The same pitch connects advertising and creator work to constituent messages and reusable supporter lists. These are the organization's stated methods; sequence alone does not establish the counterfactual effect of each contact.</p>\n<p>Sources: <a href=\"https://controlai.org/dip\">Direct Institutional Plan</a>, <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan\">funding and operating strategy</a>. The funding page is dated 20 April 2026, but its current counters may have been updated. Budget scenarios are fundraising plans, not verified spending.</p>\n<pre><code class=\"language-mermaid\">flowchart LR\n  P[&quot;Policy drafting&quot;] --&gt;|&quot;published strategy&quot;| C[&quot;ControlAI advocacy&quot;]\n  C --&gt;|&quot;briefings and support requests&quot;| L[&quot;Legislators&quot;]\n  C --&gt;|&quot;creator work and advertising&quot;| A[&quot;Public audiences&quot;]\n  A --&gt;|&quot;campaign tools&quot;| M[&quot;Constituent messages&quot;]\n  M --&gt; L\n  L --&gt;|&quot;official records&quot;| T[&quot;Debates and tabled amendments&quot;]\n  T -.-&gt;|&quot;adoption not established&quot;| E[&quot;Enacted authority&quot;]\n  D[&quot;Upstream donors and conditions unknown&quot;] -.-&gt;|&quot;unresolved funding path&quot;| C\n</code></pre>\n<p>The chart describes documented activities and an intended endpoint. It does not establish that all audience members changed their views because of the campaign or that legislators were obligated to act.</p>\n<h2>Current legislative positions</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Instrument</th>\n<th>Evidence at the cutoff</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Commons NC12, cyber-resilience bill</td>\n<td>Official decision: Not called. Sobel said on 16 June that he would not push it to a vote.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lords Amendment 84, same bill</td>\n<td>Official decision: Not moved. Sponsors include Clement-Jones, Kidron, Harding and Hunt.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sobel ten-minute-rule motion on ASI</td>\n<td>Official schedule lists 8 September 2026. Future business, not completed introduction or passage.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI's own ASI draft</td>\n<td>Current download exists; the exact text ultimately introduced by an MP remains to be checked after introduction.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Primary status sources: <a href=\"https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477\">NC12</a>, <a href=\"https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477\">Amendment 84</a>, <a href=\"https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/\">Parliament's 4 September schedule</a>. <a href=\"https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill\">July 14 Hansard</a> explicitly attributes shutdown proposals to ControlAI. The committee stage continues; the amendment's current procedural status does not close the campaign.</p>\n<p>The shutdown amendment and the ASI-prohibition draft are separate instruments. The former includes an AI-contributed systems compromise and catastrophic-risk trigger, parliamentary reporting and High Court relief; its subject is emergency intervention. It does not itself enact the latter's prohibition.</p>\n<h2>Direct reading of the current ControlAI draft</h2>\n<p>The 22-page download defines ASI through serious UK-security harm from capability to override specified state authorities (clause 3). It proposes compute-recipient identity records (14), model/data seizure and destruction following detected ASI progress (15), and an expert panel appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General with the Home Affairs chair's agreement (16). Recent AI-developer employment/funding disqualifies panel candidates. Parliamentary review and civil-penalty appeals appear in clauses 15 and 23. This is proposed text, not enacted authority or an NGO appointment entitlement.</p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf\">current downloadable draft</a>. More detailed clause references are included so the propositions can be checked without reproducing the draft.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://controlai.org/uk-asi-bill\">landing page</a> currently supplies both a 22-page download and a different 19-page embedded PDF. Both were captured, with URL, time, size and SHA-256, in <a >capture receipts</a>. The 22-page download is the version described above. No claim is made that it exactly matches the text of a bill not yet introduced.</p>\n<h2>Evidence boundary and next records</h2>\n<p>The reviewed record establishes an organization producing policy proposals, assembling public support, and obtaining parliamentary sponsorship. It does not establish the source or conditions of its major funding, covert direction of politicians, or appointments to a future regulator. Comparative centrality among all AI-policy organizations was not measured, so the word &quot;major&quot; should not be treated as a quantified ranking.</p>\n<p>The next records that would change the map are an actual introduced bill and its sponsor acknowledgments, decisions on subsequent amendments, specific donor/grant disclosures, inter-entity resource agreements, and any future appointment or procurement record. No recurring monitoring, outreach, or publication has been initiated. This standalone supplement is outside the earlier core report's structural citation audit.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Conjecture's faction history and ControlAI's policy pathways \n Observed 5 September 2026. This is a factual follow-up to the Miotti/Behrens connection map. The user's phrase \"control injection node\" is a hypothesis about institutional function, not a finding of covert control. \n Completed workstreams \n  Conjecture chronology and faction evidence : the documented rupture is with parts of core EA, contemporaneously visible in June 2023. The reviewed e/acc connection is public disagreement. No earlier e/acc membership, departure, or investor withdrawal was established. \n  Institutional uptake and current legislative status : official records distinguish parliamentary acknowledgments, lodged evidence, tabled amendments and future scheduled business. No enacted provision attributable to ControlAI was established. \n  Upstream funding follow-up : direct donor identities and transfer conditions remain unresolved. A surfaced grantmaking entry is an application, not an award. Original US 990-EZ retrieval failed; secondary financial extraction is not treated as original-filing verification. \n Published influence method \n ControlAI's Direct Institutional Plan links policy drafting with persuasion across legislatures, government, media and civil society. Its current funding pitch describes sales-style measurement: briefings, signed endorsements, then public statements after briefings. The same pitch connects advertising and creator work to constituent messages and reusable supporter lists. These are the organization's stated methods; sequence alone does not establish the counterfactual effect of each contact. \n Sources:  Direct Institutional Plan ,  funding and operating strategy . The funding page is dated 20 April 2026, but its current counters may have been updated. Budget scenarios are fundraising plans, not verified spending. \n  flowchart LR\n  P[\"Policy drafting\"] -->|\"published strategy\"| C[\"ControlAI advocacy\"]\n  C -->|\"briefings and support requests\"| L[\"Legislators\"]\n  C -->|\"creator work and advertising\"| A[\"Public audiences\"]\n  A -->|\"campaign tools\"| M[\"Constituent messages\"]\n  M --> L\n  L -->|\"official records\"| T[\"Debates and tabled amendments\"]\n  T -.->|\"adoption not established\"| E[\"Enacted authority\"]\n  D[\"Upstream donors and conditions unknown\"] -.->|\"unresolved funding path\"| C\n  \n The chart describes documented activities and an intended endpoint. It does not establish that all audience members changed their views because of the campaign or that legislators were obligated to act. \n Current legislative positions \n \n \n \n Instrument \n Evidence at the cutoff \n \n \n \n \n Commons NC12, cyber-resilience bill \n Official decision: Not called. Sobel said on 16 June that he would not push it to a vote. \n \n \n Lords Amendment 84, same bill \n Official decision: Not moved. Sponsors include Clement-Jones, Kidron, Harding and Hunt. \n \n \n Sobel ten-minute-rule motion on ASI \n Official schedule lists 8 September 2026. Future business, not completed introduction or passage. \n \n \n ControlAI's own ASI draft \n Current download exists; the exact text ultimately introduced by an MP remains to be checked after introduction. \n \n \n \n Primary status sources:  NC12 ,  Amendment 84 ,  Parliament's 4 September schedule .  July 14 Hansard  explicitly attributes shutdown proposals to ControlAI. The committee stage continues; the amendment's current procedural status does not close the campaign. \n The shutdown amendment and the ASI-prohibition draft are separate instruments. The former includes an AI-contributed systems compromise and catastrophic-risk trigger, parliamentary reporting and High Court relief; its subject is emergency intervention. It does not itself enact the latter's prohibition. \n Direct reading of the current ControlAI draft \n The 22-page download defines ASI through serious UK-security harm from capability to override specified state authorities (clause 3). It proposes compute-recipient identity records (14), model/data seizure and destruction following detected ASI progress (15), and an expert panel appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General with the Home Affairs chair's agreement (16). Recent AI-developer employment/funding disqualifies panel candidates. Parliamentary review and civil-penalty appeals appear in clauses 15 and 23. This is proposed text, not enacted authority or an NGO appointment entitlement. \n Source:  current downloadable draft . More detailed clause references are included so the propositions can be checked without reproducing the draft. \n The  landing page  currently supplies both a 22-page download and a different 19-page embedded PDF. Both were captured, with URL, time, size and SHA-256, in  capture receipts . The 22-page download is the version described above. No claim is made that it exactly matches the text of a bill not yet introduced. \n Evidence boundary and next records \n The reviewed record establishes an organization producing policy proposals, assembling public support, and obtaining parliamentary sponsorship. It does not establish the source or conditions of its major funding, covert direction of politicians, or appointments to a future regulator. Comparative centrality among all AI-policy organizations was not measured, so the word \"major\" should not be treated as a quantified ranking. \n The next records that would change the map are an actual introduced bill and its sponsor acknowledgments, decisions on subsequent amendments, specific donor/grant disclosures, inter-entity resource agreements, and any future appointment or procurement record. No recurring monitoring, outreach, or publication has been initiated. This standalone supplement is outside the earlier core report's structural citation audit. \n",
        "path": "conjecture-controlai-pathways.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Conjecture's faction history and ControlAI's policy pathways\n\nObserved 5 September 2026. This is a factual follow-up to the Miotti/Behrens connection map. The user's phrase \"control injection node\" is a hypothesis about institutional function, not a finding of covert control.\n\n## Completed workstreams\n\n[Conjecture chronology and faction evidence](E:/Indranet/Research/ai-influence-money-2026-09-05/workstreams/controlai/conjecture-factions.md): the documented rupture is with parts of core EA, contemporaneously visible in June 2023. The reviewed e/acc connection is public disagreement. No earlier e/acc membership, departure, or investor withdrawal was established.\n\n[Institutional uptake and current legislative status](E:/Indranet/Research/ai-influence-money-2026-09-05/workstreams/controlai/institutional-uptake.md): official records distinguish parliamentary acknowledgments, lodged evidence, tabled amendments and future scheduled business. No enacted provision attributable to ControlAI was established.\n\n[Upstream funding follow-up](E:/Indranet/Research/ai-influence-money-2026-09-05/workstreams/controlai/controlai-upstream-followup.md): direct donor identities and transfer conditions remain unresolved. A surfaced grantmaking entry is an application, not an award. Original US 990-EZ retrieval failed; secondary financial extraction is not treated as original-filing verification.\n\n## Published influence method\n\nControlAI's Direct Institutional Plan links policy drafting with persuasion across legislatures, government, media and civil society. Its current funding pitch describes sales-style measurement: briefings, signed endorsements, then public statements after briefings. The same pitch connects advertising and creator work to constituent messages and reusable supporter lists. These are the organization's stated methods; sequence alone does not establish the counterfactual effect of each contact.\n\nSources: [Direct Institutional Plan](https://controlai.org/dip), [funding and operating strategy](https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan). The funding page is dated 20 April 2026, but its current counters may have been updated. Budget scenarios are fundraising plans, not verified spending.\n\n```mermaid\nflowchart LR\n  P[\"Policy drafting\"] -->|\"published strategy\"| C[\"ControlAI advocacy\"]\n  C -->|\"briefings and support requests\"| L[\"Legislators\"]\n  C -->|\"creator work and advertising\"| A[\"Public audiences\"]\n  A -->|\"campaign tools\"| M[\"Constituent messages\"]\n  M --> L\n  L -->|\"official records\"| T[\"Debates and tabled amendments\"]\n  T -.->|\"adoption not established\"| E[\"Enacted authority\"]\n  D[\"Upstream donors and conditions unknown\"] -.->|\"unresolved funding path\"| C\n```\n\nThe chart describes documented activities and an intended endpoint. It does not establish that all audience members changed their views because of the campaign or that legislators were obligated to act.\n\n## Current legislative positions\n\n| Instrument | Evidence at the cutoff |\n|---|---|\n| Commons NC12, cyber-resilience bill | Official decision: Not called. Sobel said on 16 June that he would not push it to a vote. |\n| Lords Amendment 84, same bill | Official decision: Not moved. Sponsors include Clement-Jones, Kidron, Harding and Hunt. |\n| Sobel ten-minute-rule motion on ASI | Official schedule lists 8 September 2026. Future business, not completed introduction or passage. |\n| ControlAI's own ASI draft | Current download exists; the exact text ultimately introduced by an MP remains to be checked after introduction. |\n\nPrimary status sources: [NC12](https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/20525/amendments/10034477), [Amendment 84](https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4035/stages/21083/amendments/10037477), [Parliament's 4 September schedule](https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2026/september-2026/coming-up-in-the-commons-7-11-september/). [July 14 Hansard](https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2026-07-14/debates/29073BC1-AD49-48CF-A269-8E83A76AFE90/CyberSecurityAndResilience(NetworkAndInformationSystems)Bill) explicitly attributes shutdown proposals to ControlAI. The committee stage continues; the amendment's current procedural status does not close the campaign.\n\nThe shutdown amendment and the ASI-prohibition draft are separate instruments. The former includes an AI-contributed systems compromise and catastrophic-risk trigger, parliamentary reporting and High Court relief; its subject is emergency intervention. It does not itself enact the latter's prohibition.\n\n## Direct reading of the current ControlAI draft\n\nThe 22-page download defines ASI through serious UK-security harm from capability to override specified state authorities (clause 3). It proposes compute-recipient identity records (14), model/data seizure and destruction following detected ASI progress (15), and an expert panel appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General with the Home Affairs chair's agreement (16). Recent AI-developer employment/funding disqualifies panel candidates. Parliamentary review and civil-penalty appeals appear in clauses 15 and 23. This is proposed text, not enacted authority or an NGO appointment entitlement.\n\nSource: [current downloadable draft](https://images.controlai.com/ControlAI_UK_ASI_Bill_Ten_Minute_Rule.pdf). More detailed clause references are included so the propositions can be checked without reproducing the draft.\n\nThe [landing page](https://controlai.org/uk-asi-bill) currently supplies both a 22-page download and a different 19-page embedded PDF. Both were captured, with URL, time, size and SHA-256, in [capture receipts](E:/Indranet/Research/ai-influence-money-2026-09-05/workstreams/controlai/primary/draft-capture-receipts.json). The 22-page download is the version described above. No claim is made that it exactly matches the text of a bill not yet introduced.\n\n## Evidence boundary and next records\n\nThe reviewed record establishes an organization producing policy proposals, assembling public support, and obtaining parliamentary sponsorship. It does not establish the source or conditions of its major funding, covert direction of politicians, or appointments to a future regulator. Comparative centrality among all AI-policy organizations was not measured, so the word \"major\" should not be treated as a quantified ranking.\n\nThe next records that would change the map are an actual introduced bill and its sponsor acknowledgments, decisions on subsequent amendments, specific donor/grant disclosures, inter-entity resource agreements, and any future appointment or procurement record. No recurring monitoring, outreach, or publication has been initiated. This standalone supplement is outside the earlier core report's structural citation audit.\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-cais-findings",
        "title": "CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings</h1>\n<p>Research cutoff: 2026-09-05. Public-source inquiry. Claims below distinguish organization statements, public tax data, indexed historical source text and inference. No outreach. No evidence obtained of undisclosed editorial orders or of the identity of the screenshot sender described by Sabine Hossenfelder.</p>\n<h2>Main result</h2>\n<p>CAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster.</p>\n<h2>Source registry (URLs are exact; checked 2026-09-05)</h2>\n<p>S1. <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/881751310\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/881751310</a> — IRS-derived nonprofit index, financial and officer extracts read. CAIS EIN 88-1751310; 501(c)(3); exempt since Jan 2023. Years 2022-2024; FY2024 filed Nov 17 2025; FY2023 June 9 2025; FY2022 Nov 16 2023. Raw embedded return/PDF unavailable in web parser; XML endpoint returned security check in one alternative retrieval, branch stopped.\nS2. <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608</a> — IRS-derived index read. CAIS Action Fund EIN 93-2442608; 501(c)(4); exempt since Oct 2023. FY2024 filed Nov 17 2025; FY2023 Nov 15 2024. Same raw-return access limit.\nS3. <a href=\"https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all</a> — historical funder database text read in search-index result. Live URL redirects to <a href=\"https://goodventures.org/our-giving/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://goodventures.org/our-giving/</a> without the historical rows in extracted text. Four CAIS awards below. Treat as indexed historical primary-source evidence, not live database verification.\nS4. <a href=\"https://goodventures.org/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://goodventures.org/</a> — live official page read. Good Ventures describes Coefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) as its primary philanthropic advisor and identifies creators Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz.\nS5. <a href=\"https://goodventures.org/governance/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://goodventures.org/governance/</a> — live official page read. Private-foundation board: Cari Tuna (chair), Dustin Moskovitz (secretary/treasurer), Divesh Makan (partner, ICONIQ Capital).\nS6. <a href=\"https://goodventures.org/our-story/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://goodventures.org/our-story/</a> — live official founder statement read. Good Ventures created in 2011; founders intended to give away vast majority of wealth; Moskovitz's Facebook-to-Asana background described. This is origin/governance evidence, not a particular transfer record.\nS7. <a href=\"https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf</a> — official-hosted SVCF public disclosure Form 990 for calendar 2023 read selectively. Prepared Nov 5 2024; generated Nov 7 2024. PDF page 87 (zero-index 86), Schedule I continuation, row 518: CAIS EIN 88-1751310, cash grant $1,455,200, purpose SCIENCES. Relevant page screenshot retrieved. Upstream donor/account not identified in row.\nS8. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/</a> — live official grant-program page read. CAIS $22,000 recommended, general support, 2023; page labels program funds allocated. Recommendation/award disclosure, not bank-level proof.\nS9. <a href=\"https://safe.ai/about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://safe.ai/about</a> — live official CAIS overview and leadership read. Dan Hendrycks executive/research director; Oliver Zhang managing director; Josue Estrada COO. Research, field-building and advocacy mission explicitly described. Not a complete board register.\nS10. <a href=\"https://action.safe.ai/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://action.safe.ai/</a> — live official Action Fund identity, approach and priorities read. Nonpartisan advocacy; U.S. AI leadership, compute security, malicious-use prevention, global cooperation. Legal/tax separation stated.\nS11. <a href=\"https://action.safe.ai/team\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://action.safe.ai/team</a> — live official team page read. Varun Krovi executive director; self-description references Capitol Hill chief-of-staff experience, NIST RMF and CHIPS and Science Act work. Specific causal policy credit is self-reported.\nS12. <a href=\"https://danhendrycks.com/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://danhendrycks.com/</a> — live self-authored professional biography read. Describes Hendrycks as CAIS executive director and advisor to xAI and Scale AI. Terms, compensation and authority not disclosed.\nS13. <a href=\"https://www.framefellowship.com/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.framefellowship.com/</a> — live official creator-program page read. CAIS participates in Amplifier Track; independent track promises editorial control; program reports Veronica Hylak secured CAIS contract. Past mentor Max Winga identified with Control AI partnerships. Contract terms, amount and outputs not supplied.\nS14. <a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0</a> — organizer Akshyae Singh announcement, displayed Aug 27 (2026 inferred from current cohort dates/context), read. Sept 7-Nov 15 cohort; names Sara Landi Tortoli (Sara in WonderTech) to work with CAIS translating safety research into public content. Also describes Irreplaceable as originating from CAIS. Planned placement as of cutoff, not completed outcome.\nS15. <a href=\"https://coefficientgiving.org/research/ai-safety-and-security-need-more-funders/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://coefficientgiving.org/research/ai-safety-and-security-need-more-funders/</a> — official funder strategy article, indexed as published about 11 months before cutoff (exact date not extracted), substantive text read via search result. Explains funding concentration and desirability of politically/geographically appropriate donor identities; says some grantees seek minority funding from one source, creating implicit matching opportunities. Macro-level context only; no proof CAIS uses these mechanisms.</p>\n<h2>Financial scope (USD; separate entities)</h2>\n<p>CAIS FY2022: revenue 6,660,060; expenses 816,760; net assets 5,843,300.\nCAIS FY2023: revenue 16,089,191; contributions 15,594,432; expenses 8,134,449; net assets 8,538,240.\nCAIS FY2024: revenue 10,235,085; contributions 9,596,669; expenses 7,163,607; net assets 11,609,718. Latest accessible year; source S1.\nAction Fund FY2023: revenue/contributions 718,870; expenses 139,139; net assets 579,731.\nAction Fund FY2024: revenue 3,577,153; contributions 3,532,366; expenses 2,394,762; net assets 1,762,122. Latest accessible year; source S2.\nDo not sum awards into revenue shares without reconciling cash dates, accrual recognition, restrictions and fiscal periods. No complete current donor list was recovered. CAIS funding percentages from 2022-23 do not answer who funds its 2026 communications.</p>\n<h2>Typed edges</h2>\n<p>from | to | type | amount | currency | period | source | certainty / limits\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_general_support | 5160000 | USD | Nov 2022 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text; payment date not established.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_philosophy_fellowship_and_NeurIPS_prizes | 1433000 | USD | Feb 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text; restricted purpose, not creator grants.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_general_support | 4025729 | USD | Apr 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_exit_grant | 1866559 | USD | Oct 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text explicitly calls it exit grant; subsequent relationship not established.\nSilicon Valley Community Foundation | CAIS EIN 88-1751310 | reported_cash_grant_sciences | 1455200 | USD | CY2023 | S7 | Primary filed row; originating donor unknown; avoid treating SVCF as ultimate donor.\nFuture of Life Institute | CAIS | recommended_general_support_grant | 22000 | USD | 2023 | S8 | Organization disclosure; program marked funds allocated.\nCoefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) | Good Ventures | primary_philanthropic_advisor | null | null | current page Sep 5 2026 | S4 | Official role; not a separate additional grant.\nCari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz | Good Ventures | founders_and_governance | null | null | 2011-current | S4-S6 | Foundation wealth origin/roles; not proof every grant came from the same assets.\nDivesh Makan | Good Ventures | board_member | null | null | current Sep 5 2026 | S5 | Does not establish ICONIQ as donor or controller.\nDan Hendrycks | CAIS | executive_research_director | null | null | current Sep 5 2026 | S9,S12 | Official/self biography.\nDan Hendrycks | CAIS Action Fund | president | null | null | FY2024 | S2 | IRS-derived extract; compensation $0 at AF in extract.\nVarun Krovi | CAIS Action Fund | executive_director | null | null | FY2024/current | S2,S11 | Historical and current agree.\nDan Hendrycks | xAI; Scale AI | professional_advisor | null | null | current biography Sep 5 2026 | S12 | Amount, role scope and decision power unknown.\nFrame Fellowship | CAIS | amplifier_track_host_partnership | null | null | cohort 2 Sept 7-Nov 15 2026 planned | S13,S14 | Publicly announced hosting, not proof of specific paid output.\nCAIS | Veronica Hylak | creator_contract_reported_by_program | null | null | before Sep 5 2026; exact date unknown | S13 | Contract existence is program assertion; no executed contract or amount read.\nFrame Fellowship / CAIS | Sara Landi Tortoli | announced_creator_placement | null | null | Sept 7-Nov 15 2026 planned | S14 | Future work at cutoff; not an accomplished campaign.\nMax Winga / Control AI | Frame Fellowship | past_mentorship | null | null | before cutoff, exact dates unknown | S13 | People/program connection; no CAIS-ControlAI money edge inferred.</p>\n<p>Four historical Good Ventures award entries total $12,485,288, but that is an award inventory, not a reconciled received-funding total. Open Philanthropy recommendations and Good Ventures awards must not be double counted.</p>\n<h2>Story assessment and rival explanations</h2>\n<p>Strongest defensible finding: CAIS combines technical credibility, public advocacy and access to a creator-training/placement network; it is not just a laboratory. The Action Fund is openly concerned with national-security/leadership policy, so describing the entire complex simply as anti-AI obscures stated objectives. Industry advisory roles provide access and possible conflicts worth scrutinizing, but do not prove an industry secretly controls CAIS.</p>\n<p>A plausible influence story is that large philanthropic commitments help build institutions and trained communicators who shape public and policy agendas. The rival explanation is mission-aligned research and risk education with independent or negotiated editorial arrangements. Frame explicitly offers both independent and organization-amplifier modes, so one blanket independence claim for all fellows would also be wrong. Funding, access, planned cooperation, and editorial control require different evidence.</p>\n<p>The historical exit-grant label is discriminating evidence against assuming continuous Good Ventures control. SVCF is a material funding intermediary whose ultimate contributor cannot be read from this row. The FLI connection is real but small in this specific 2023 grant disclosure. No Constellation-to-CAIS funding edge was established; shared ecosystem references and compute acknowledgments are insufficient.</p>\n<h2>Gaps and finite next steps</h2>\n<p>The screenshot sender/offer is unidentified; Sabine's own declined sponsor is separate and unnamed. No specific current CAIS creator-grant application terms, total budget, creator payment, disclosure clause, or editorial veto was found. A public screenshot or grant agreement would discriminate better than more generic organization searches.\nComplete current boards and inter-entity transfers require full relevant 990 schedules or public regulator records; index officer names are not a complete board roster. CAIS 2024 impact-report landing page <a href=\"https://safe.ai/work/impact-report/2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://safe.ai/work/impact-report/2024</a> links <a href=\"https://odw.dev/cais/CAIS_impact_report_2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://odw.dev/cais/CAIS_impact_report_2024.pdf</a> but PDF retrieval failed (web 502; one PowerShell substitute SSL failure); no report content or audited financial statements were certified read. CAIS raw 990 page/PDF parser and XML security-check failure are access limitations, not suspicious findings.\nSecondary leads not promoted: FTX/FTX Future Fund startup funding and bankruptcy subpoena; Schmidt-related grants; OpenAI 2023 990 grants. These require primary records. Do not let a secondary database's apparent FY2025 label turn historical Good Ventures awards into new 2025 funding.</p>\n<p>No relevant memory hit was found in the single registry search; no memory fact was used. No outreach or publication. This note is the workstream handoff, not a completed forensic audit.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings \n Research cutoff: 2026-09-05. Public-source inquiry. Claims below distinguish organization statements, public tax data, indexed historical source text and inference. No outreach. No evidence obtained of undisclosed editorial orders or of the identity of the screenshot sender described by Sabine Hossenfelder. \n Main result \n CAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster. \n Source registry (URLs are exact; checked 2026-09-05) \n S1.  https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/881751310  — IRS-derived nonprofit index, financial and officer extracts read. CAIS EIN 88-1751310; 501(c)(3); exempt since Jan 2023. Years 2022-2024; FY2024 filed Nov 17 2025; FY2023 June 9 2025; FY2022 Nov 16 2023. Raw embedded return/PDF unavailable in web parser; XML endpoint returned security check in one alternative retrieval, branch stopped.\nS2.  https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608  — IRS-derived index read. CAIS Action Fund EIN 93-2442608; 501(c)(4); exempt since Oct 2023. FY2024 filed Nov 17 2025; FY2023 Nov 15 2024. Same raw-return access limit.\nS3.  https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all  — historical funder database text read in search-index result. Live URL redirects to  https://goodventures.org/our-giving/  without the historical rows in extracted text. Four CAIS awards below. Treat as indexed historical primary-source evidence, not live database verification.\nS4.  https://goodventures.org/  — live official page read. Good Ventures describes Coefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) as its primary philanthropic advisor and identifies creators Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz.\nS5.  https://goodventures.org/governance/  — live official page read. Private-foundation board: Cari Tuna (chair), Dustin Moskovitz (secretary/treasurer), Divesh Makan (partner, ICONIQ Capital).\nS6.  https://goodventures.org/our-story/  — live official founder statement read. Good Ventures created in 2011; founders intended to give away vast majority of wealth; Moskovitz's Facebook-to-Asana background described. This is origin/governance evidence, not a particular transfer record.\nS7.  https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf  — official-hosted SVCF public disclosure Form 990 for calendar 2023 read selectively. Prepared Nov 5 2024; generated Nov 7 2024. PDF page 87 (zero-index 86), Schedule I continuation, row 518: CAIS EIN 88-1751310, cash grant $1,455,200, purpose SCIENCES. Relevant page screenshot retrieved. Upstream donor/account not identified in row.\nS8.  https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/  — live official grant-program page read. CAIS $22,000 recommended, general support, 2023; page labels program funds allocated. Recommendation/award disclosure, not bank-level proof.\nS9.  https://safe.ai/about  — live official CAIS overview and leadership read. Dan Hendrycks executive/research director; Oliver Zhang managing director; Josue Estrada COO. Research, field-building and advocacy mission explicitly described. Not a complete board register.\nS10.  https://action.safe.ai/  — live official Action Fund identity, approach and priorities read. Nonpartisan advocacy; U.S. AI leadership, compute security, malicious-use prevention, global cooperation. Legal/tax separation stated.\nS11.  https://action.safe.ai/team  — live official team page read. Varun Krovi executive director; self-description references Capitol Hill chief-of-staff experience, NIST RMF and CHIPS and Science Act work. Specific causal policy credit is self-reported.\nS12.  https://danhendrycks.com/  — live self-authored professional biography read. Describes Hendrycks as CAIS executive director and advisor to xAI and Scale AI. Terms, compensation and authority not disclosed.\nS13.  https://www.framefellowship.com/  — live official creator-program page read. CAIS participates in Amplifier Track; independent track promises editorial control; program reports Veronica Hylak secured CAIS contract. Past mentor Max Winga identified with Control AI partnerships. Contract terms, amount and outputs not supplied.\nS14.  https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0  — organizer Akshyae Singh announcement, displayed Aug 27 (2026 inferred from current cohort dates/context), read. Sept 7-Nov 15 cohort; names Sara Landi Tortoli (Sara in WonderTech) to work with CAIS translating safety research into public content. Also describes Irreplaceable as originating from CAIS. Planned placement as of cutoff, not completed outcome.\nS15.  https://coefficientgiving.org/research/ai-safety-and-security-need-more-funders/  — official funder strategy article, indexed as published about 11 months before cutoff (exact date not extracted), substantive text read via search result. Explains funding concentration and desirability of politically/geographically appropriate donor identities; says some grantees seek minority funding from one source, creating implicit matching opportunities. Macro-level context only; no proof CAIS uses these mechanisms. \n Financial scope (USD; separate entities) \n CAIS FY2022: revenue 6,660,060; expenses 816,760; net assets 5,843,300.\nCAIS FY2023: revenue 16,089,191; contributions 15,594,432; expenses 8,134,449; net assets 8,538,240.\nCAIS FY2024: revenue 10,235,085; contributions 9,596,669; expenses 7,163,607; net assets 11,609,718. Latest accessible year; source S1.\nAction Fund FY2023: revenue/contributions 718,870; expenses 139,139; net assets 579,731.\nAction Fund FY2024: revenue 3,577,153; contributions 3,532,366; expenses 2,394,762; net assets 1,762,122. Latest accessible year; source S2.\nDo not sum awards into revenue shares without reconciling cash dates, accrual recognition, restrictions and fiscal periods. No complete current donor list was recovered. CAIS funding percentages from 2022-23 do not answer who funds its 2026 communications. \n Typed edges \n from | to | type | amount | currency | period | source | certainty / limits\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_general_support | 5160000 | USD | Nov 2022 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text; payment date not established.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_philosophy_fellowship_and_NeurIPS_prizes | 1433000 | USD | Feb 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text; restricted purpose, not creator grants.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_general_support | 4025729 | USD | Apr 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_exit_grant | 1866559 | USD | Oct 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text explicitly calls it exit grant; subsequent relationship not established.\nSilicon Valley Community Foundation | CAIS EIN 88-1751310 | reported_cash_grant_sciences | 1455200 | USD | CY2023 | S7 | Primary filed row; originating donor unknown; avoid treating SVCF as ultimate donor.\nFuture of Life Institute | CAIS | recommended_general_support_grant | 22000 | USD | 2023 | S8 | Organization disclosure; program marked funds allocated.\nCoefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) | Good Ventures | primary_philanthropic_advisor | null | null | current page Sep 5 2026 | S4 | Official role; not a separate additional grant.\nCari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz | Good Ventures | founders_and_governance | null | null | 2011-current | S4-S6 | Foundation wealth origin/roles; not proof every grant came from the same assets.\nDivesh Makan | Good Ventures | board_member | null | null | current Sep 5 2026 | S5 | Does not establish ICONIQ as donor or controller.\nDan Hendrycks | CAIS | executive_research_director | null | null | current Sep 5 2026 | S9,S12 | Official/self biography.\nDan Hendrycks | CAIS Action Fund | president | null | null | FY2024 | S2 | IRS-derived extract; compensation $0 at AF in extract.\nVarun Krovi | CAIS Action Fund | executive_director | null | null | FY2024/current | S2,S11 | Historical and current agree.\nDan Hendrycks | xAI; Scale AI | professional_advisor | null | null | current biography Sep 5 2026 | S12 | Amount, role scope and decision power unknown.\nFrame Fellowship | CAIS | amplifier_track_host_partnership | null | null | cohort 2 Sept 7-Nov 15 2026 planned | S13,S14 | Publicly announced hosting, not proof of specific paid output.\nCAIS | Veronica Hylak | creator_contract_reported_by_program | null | null | before Sep 5 2026; exact date unknown | S13 | Contract existence is program assertion; no executed contract or amount read.\nFrame Fellowship / CAIS | Sara Landi Tortoli | announced_creator_placement | null | null | Sept 7-Nov 15 2026 planned | S14 | Future work at cutoff; not an accomplished campaign.\nMax Winga / Control AI | Frame Fellowship | past_mentorship | null | null | before cutoff, exact dates unknown | S13 | People/program connection; no CAIS-ControlAI money edge inferred. \n Four historical Good Ventures award entries total $12,485,288, but that is an award inventory, not a reconciled received-funding total. Open Philanthropy recommendations and Good Ventures awards must not be double counted. \n Story assessment and rival explanations \n Strongest defensible finding: CAIS combines technical credibility, public advocacy and access to a creator-training/placement network; it is not just a laboratory. The Action Fund is openly concerned with national-security/leadership policy, so describing the entire complex simply as anti-AI obscures stated objectives. Industry advisory roles provide access and possible conflicts worth scrutinizing, but do not prove an industry secretly controls CAIS. \n A plausible influence story is that large philanthropic commitments help build institutions and trained communicators who shape public and policy agendas. The rival explanation is mission-aligned research and risk education with independent or negotiated editorial arrangements. Frame explicitly offers both independent and organization-amplifier modes, so one blanket independence claim for all fellows would also be wrong. Funding, access, planned cooperation, and editorial control require different evidence. \n The historical exit-grant label is discriminating evidence against assuming continuous Good Ventures control. SVCF is a material funding intermediary whose ultimate contributor cannot be read from this row. The FLI connection is real but small in this specific 2023 grant disclosure. No Constellation-to-CAIS funding edge was established; shared ecosystem references and compute acknowledgments are insufficient. \n Gaps and finite next steps \n The screenshot sender/offer is unidentified; Sabine's own declined sponsor is separate and unnamed. No specific current CAIS creator-grant application terms, total budget, creator payment, disclosure clause, or editorial veto was found. A public screenshot or grant agreement would discriminate better than more generic organization searches.\nComplete current boards and inter-entity transfers require full relevant 990 schedules or public regulator records; index officer names are not a complete board roster. CAIS 2024 impact-report landing page  https://safe.ai/work/impact-report/2024  links  https://odw.dev/cais/CAIS_impact_report_2024.pdf  but PDF retrieval failed (web 502; one PowerShell substitute SSL failure); no report content or audited financial statements were certified read. CAIS raw 990 page/PDF parser and XML security-check failure are access limitations, not suspicious findings.\nSecondary leads not promoted: FTX/FTX Future Fund startup funding and bankruptcy subpoena; Schmidt-related grants; OpenAI 2023 990 grants. These require primary records. Do not let a secondary database's apparent FY2025 label turn historical Good Ventures awards into new 2025 funding. \n No relevant memory hit was found in the single registry search; no memory fact was used. No outreach or publication. This note is the workstream handoff, not a completed forensic audit. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/cais/findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# CAIS funding and creator-pathway findings\nResearch cutoff: 2026-09-05. Public-source inquiry. Claims below distinguish organization statements, public tax data, indexed historical source text and inference. No outreach. No evidence obtained of undisclosed editorial orders or of the identity of the screenshot sender described by Sabine Hossenfelder.\n\n## Main result\nCAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster.\n\n## Source registry (URLs are exact; checked 2026-09-05)\nS1. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/881751310 — IRS-derived nonprofit index, financial and officer extracts read. CAIS EIN 88-1751310; 501(c)(3); exempt since Jan 2023. Years 2022-2024; FY2024 filed Nov 17 2025; FY2023 June 9 2025; FY2022 Nov 16 2023. Raw embedded return/PDF unavailable in web parser; XML endpoint returned security check in one alternative retrieval, branch stopped.\nS2. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/932442608 — IRS-derived index read. CAIS Action Fund EIN 93-2442608; 501(c)(4); exempt since Oct 2023. FY2024 filed Nov 17 2025; FY2023 Nov 15 2024. Same raw-return access limit.\nS3. https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all — historical funder database text read in search-index result. Live URL redirects to https://goodventures.org/our-giving/ without the historical rows in extracted text. Four CAIS awards below. Treat as indexed historical primary-source evidence, not live database verification.\nS4. https://goodventures.org/ — live official page read. Good Ventures describes Coefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) as its primary philanthropic advisor and identifies creators Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz.\nS5. https://goodventures.org/governance/ — live official page read. Private-foundation board: Cari Tuna (chair), Dustin Moskovitz (secretary/treasurer), Divesh Makan (partner, ICONIQ Capital).\nS6. https://goodventures.org/our-story/ — live official founder statement read. Good Ventures created in 2011; founders intended to give away vast majority of wealth; Moskovitz's Facebook-to-Asana background described. This is origin/governance evidence, not a particular transfer record.\nS7. https://www.svcf.org/assets/img/media/SVCF-2023-990-PDC.pdf — official-hosted SVCF public disclosure Form 990 for calendar 2023 read selectively. Prepared Nov 5 2024; generated Nov 7 2024. PDF page 87 (zero-index 86), Schedule I continuation, row 518: CAIS EIN 88-1751310, cash grant $1,455,200, purpose SCIENCES. Relevant page screenshot retrieved. Upstream donor/account not identified in row.\nS8. https://futureoflife.org/grant-program/2023-grants/ — live official grant-program page read. CAIS $22,000 recommended, general support, 2023; page labels program funds allocated. Recommendation/award disclosure, not bank-level proof.\nS9. https://safe.ai/about — live official CAIS overview and leadership read. Dan Hendrycks executive/research director; Oliver Zhang managing director; Josue Estrada COO. Research, field-building and advocacy mission explicitly described. Not a complete board register.\nS10. https://action.safe.ai/ — live official Action Fund identity, approach and priorities read. Nonpartisan advocacy; U.S. AI leadership, compute security, malicious-use prevention, global cooperation. Legal/tax separation stated.\nS11. https://action.safe.ai/team — live official team page read. Varun Krovi executive director; self-description references Capitol Hill chief-of-staff experience, NIST RMF and CHIPS and Science Act work. Specific causal policy credit is self-reported.\nS12. https://danhendrycks.com/ — live self-authored professional biography read. Describes Hendrycks as CAIS executive director and advisor to xAI and Scale AI. Terms, compensation and authority not disclosed.\nS13. https://www.framefellowship.com/ — live official creator-program page read. CAIS participates in Amplifier Track; independent track promises editorial control; program reports Veronica Hylak secured CAIS contract. Past mentor Max Winga identified with Control AI partnerships. Contract terms, amount and outputs not supplied.\nS14. https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/bQDBB8L9RjPmfGLiB/meet-the-fellows-frame-fellowship-cohort-2-0 — organizer Akshyae Singh announcement, displayed Aug 27 (2026 inferred from current cohort dates/context), read. Sept 7-Nov 15 cohort; names Sara Landi Tortoli (Sara in WonderTech) to work with CAIS translating safety research into public content. Also describes Irreplaceable as originating from CAIS. Planned placement as of cutoff, not completed outcome.\nS15. https://coefficientgiving.org/research/ai-safety-and-security-need-more-funders/ — official funder strategy article, indexed as published about 11 months before cutoff (exact date not extracted), substantive text read via search result. Explains funding concentration and desirability of politically/geographically appropriate donor identities; says some grantees seek minority funding from one source, creating implicit matching opportunities. Macro-level context only; no proof CAIS uses these mechanisms.\n\n## Financial scope (USD; separate entities)\nCAIS FY2022: revenue 6,660,060; expenses 816,760; net assets 5,843,300.\nCAIS FY2023: revenue 16,089,191; contributions 15,594,432; expenses 8,134,449; net assets 8,538,240.\nCAIS FY2024: revenue 10,235,085; contributions 9,596,669; expenses 7,163,607; net assets 11,609,718. Latest accessible year; source S1.\nAction Fund FY2023: revenue/contributions 718,870; expenses 139,139; net assets 579,731.\nAction Fund FY2024: revenue 3,577,153; contributions 3,532,366; expenses 2,394,762; net assets 1,762,122. Latest accessible year; source S2.\nDo not sum awards into revenue shares without reconciling cash dates, accrual recognition, restrictions and fiscal periods. No complete current donor list was recovered. CAIS funding percentages from 2022-23 do not answer who funds its 2026 communications.\n\n## Typed edges\nfrom | to | type | amount | currency | period | source | certainty / limits\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_general_support | 5160000 | USD | Nov 2022 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text; payment date not established.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_philosophy_fellowship_and_NeurIPS_prizes | 1433000 | USD | Feb 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text; restricted purpose, not creator grants.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_general_support | 4025729 | USD | Apr 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text.\nGood Ventures / Open Phil-advised funding | CAIS | grant_award_exit_grant | 1866559 | USD | Oct 2023 | S3 | Indexed historical primary text explicitly calls it exit grant; subsequent relationship not established.\nSilicon Valley Community Foundation | CAIS EIN 88-1751310 | reported_cash_grant_sciences | 1455200 | USD | CY2023 | S7 | Primary filed row; originating donor unknown; avoid treating SVCF as ultimate donor.\nFuture of Life Institute | CAIS | recommended_general_support_grant | 22000 | USD | 2023 | S8 | Organization disclosure; program marked funds allocated.\nCoefficient Giving (formerly Open Philanthropy) | Good Ventures | primary_philanthropic_advisor | null | null | current page Sep 5 2026 | S4 | Official role; not a separate additional grant.\nCari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz | Good Ventures | founders_and_governance | null | null | 2011-current | S4-S6 | Foundation wealth origin/roles; not proof every grant came from the same assets.\nDivesh Makan | Good Ventures | board_member | null | null | current Sep 5 2026 | S5 | Does not establish ICONIQ as donor or controller.\nDan Hendrycks | CAIS | executive_research_director | null | null | current Sep 5 2026 | S9,S12 | Official/self biography.\nDan Hendrycks | CAIS Action Fund | president | null | null | FY2024 | S2 | IRS-derived extract; compensation $0 at AF in extract.\nVarun Krovi | CAIS Action Fund | executive_director | null | null | FY2024/current | S2,S11 | Historical and current agree.\nDan Hendrycks | xAI; Scale AI | professional_advisor | null | null | current biography Sep 5 2026 | S12 | Amount, role scope and decision power unknown.\nFrame Fellowship | CAIS | amplifier_track_host_partnership | null | null | cohort 2 Sept 7-Nov 15 2026 planned | S13,S14 | Publicly announced hosting, not proof of specific paid output.\nCAIS | Veronica Hylak | creator_contract_reported_by_program | null | null | before Sep 5 2026; exact date unknown | S13 | Contract existence is program assertion; no executed contract or amount read.\nFrame Fellowship / CAIS | Sara Landi Tortoli | announced_creator_placement | null | null | Sept 7-Nov 15 2026 planned | S14 | Future work at cutoff; not an accomplished campaign.\nMax Winga / Control AI | Frame Fellowship | past_mentorship | null | null | before cutoff, exact dates unknown | S13 | People/program connection; no CAIS-ControlAI money edge inferred.\n\nFour historical Good Ventures award entries total $12,485,288, but that is an award inventory, not a reconciled received-funding total. Open Philanthropy recommendations and Good Ventures awards must not be double counted.\n\n## Story assessment and rival explanations\nStrongest defensible finding: CAIS combines technical credibility, public advocacy and access to a creator-training/placement network; it is not just a laboratory. The Action Fund is openly concerned with national-security/leadership policy, so describing the entire complex simply as anti-AI obscures stated objectives. Industry advisory roles provide access and possible conflicts worth scrutinizing, but do not prove an industry secretly controls CAIS.\n\nA plausible influence story is that large philanthropic commitments help build institutions and trained communicators who shape public and policy agendas. The rival explanation is mission-aligned research and risk education with independent or negotiated editorial arrangements. Frame explicitly offers both independent and organization-amplifier modes, so one blanket independence claim for all fellows would also be wrong. Funding, access, planned cooperation, and editorial control require different evidence.\n\nThe historical exit-grant label is discriminating evidence against assuming continuous Good Ventures control. SVCF is a material funding intermediary whose ultimate contributor cannot be read from this row. The FLI connection is real but small in this specific 2023 grant disclosure. No Constellation-to-CAIS funding edge was established; shared ecosystem references and compute acknowledgments are insufficient.\n\n## Gaps and finite next steps\nThe screenshot sender/offer is unidentified; Sabine's own declined sponsor is separate and unnamed. No specific current CAIS creator-grant application terms, total budget, creator payment, disclosure clause, or editorial veto was found. A public screenshot or grant agreement would discriminate better than more generic organization searches.\nComplete current boards and inter-entity transfers require full relevant 990 schedules or public regulator records; index officer names are not a complete board roster. CAIS 2024 impact-report landing page https://safe.ai/work/impact-report/2024 links https://odw.dev/cais/CAIS_impact_report_2024.pdf but PDF retrieval failed (web 502; one PowerShell substitute SSL failure); no report content or audited financial statements were certified read. CAIS raw 990 page/PDF parser and XML security-check failure are access limitations, not suspicious findings.\nSecondary leads not promoted: FTX/FTX Future Fund startup funding and bankruptcy subpoena; Schmidt-related grants; OpenAI 2023 990 grants. These require primary records. Do not let a secondary database's apparent FY2025 label turn historical Good Ventures awards into new 2025 funding.\n\nNo relevant memory hit was found in the single registry search; no memory fact was used. No outreach or publication. This note is the workstream handoff, not a completed forensic audit."
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-fli-fli-evidence-notes",
        "title": "FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes</h1>\n<p>Research cutoff: 2026-09-05. Public-source inquiry only. All listed read states refer to this run. No outreach, accounts, private access, payments or publication. This document is a research handoff, not an allegation of wrongdoing.</p>\n<h2>Findings that change the story</h2>\n<p>Paid, directed creator work is established by primary sources. There are two mechanisms whose budgets and counts must remain separate: FLI's Digital Media Accelerator (DMA), and the Protect What's Human campaign offered through People First. DMA's application asks applicants to explain alignment with FLI's AI position and their own views, estimates organic impressions, and advertises planned support of up to USD 100,000 monthly across projects. Public wording contemplates limited constructive proposal feedback. People First's campaign describes following directions, submitting drafts, receiving feedback, publishing and receiving payment. Its current general terms go further: prepublication approvals, adherence to approved messaging, revision/removal rights, and possible withholding of compensation. Those terms also require FTC endorsement/disclosure compliance, forbid unsubstantiated claims and artificial engagement. These facts establish sponsored advocacy and editorial conditions; they do not establish undisclosed sponsorship in any particular post. The campaign-specific statement of work and completed creator payments remain unobserved. Sources S4-S6.</p>\n<p>FLI publicly launched the national Protect What's Human ad campaign on February 9, 2026, with a ceiling of up to USD 8 million and initial six/seven-figure investments in Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina. This is an announced campaign envelope, not an audited amount spent or an influencer-only budget. S7.</p>\n<p>The strongest financial finding is a related-endowment loop. FLI's 2022 IRS return reports a USD 162,587,667 transfer of cash/public securities to Lightcone Foundation, alongside USD 180,297,079 in cash/financial assets to FLI Europe and USD 25,025,000 cash to Future of Life Foundation. FLI's 2024 return then identifies Lightcone as a USD 21,050,000 contributor. This is 99.590% of FLI's USD 21,136,620 contributions that year (own calculation). The matching USD 21.05m appears in the audited cashflow as noncash investment contributions. Thus the large 2024 contribution is evidence of funding from an affiliated holding/grantmaking entity, not evidence of USD 21m newly raised from an independent outside donor. FLI-alone assets fell after asset transfers; do not call that disappearance or expenditure on persuasion. S1-S3.</p>\n<p>FLI's current finance page reports 2025 expenditure of USD 46.192m, including USD 26.724m grants and USD 5.795m media/outreach; it says contributed income was approximately USD 37,000 and investment income USD 152,000, with the gap covered by funds functioning as an endowment. The page says these figures derive from independently audited statements, but the underlying complete 2025 audit was not obtained. The latest FLI IRS return located covers 2024, not 2025. S8.</p>\n<p>The donor association does not by itself establish donor control. FLI describes Vitalik Buterin as by far its largest donor and the 2021 gift as unconditional; it says he has no formal or informal decision role, and makes Jaan Tallinn, a longstanding director, the exception to its donor-influence disclaimer. In March 2026 Buterin publicly criticized the later shift toward cultural/political action. His X post could not be read directly (403), so the roughly USD 500m SHIB liquidation figure and disagreement remain a donor account carried in reporting, not a verified liquidation ledger. Cointelegraph also carries Anthony Aguirre's reply emphasizing shared goals and continuing work on coordination, epistemics and technical safeguards. S8, S15. FLI's contemporaneous June 2021 announcement corroborates Buterin/Shiba Inu support and a USD 25m multiyear grant PROGRAM; that is not the total donation. S9.</p>\n<h2>Entity and governance resolution</h2>\n<p>FLI: Future of Life Institute, EIN 47-1052538, Pennsylvania legal domicile, formed 2014, section 501(c)(3). The 2024 return reports five voting board members, two independent, 29 employees. It identifies Anthony N Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn and Viktoriya Krakovna as directors/officers. Current website presents the same five under current names/roles: Anthony Aguirre (President and CEO), Jaan Tallinn (director), Max Tegmark (Founder and Chair), Meia Chita-Tegmark (Board Secretary), Victoria Krakovna (director). These are different date states, not contradictory office labels. S1, S11.</p>\n<p>Lightcone Foundation: EIN 92-0636259, Nevada, section 501(c)(3); this is NOT proven to be Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong, Lightcone Commons, or the unrelated Pittsburgh physics Lightcone Foundation. Name-based conflation would create a false network. Its 2024 IRS-derived overview gives net assets USD 174,320,788, assets USD 174,375,915, liabilities USD 55,127, and no contributions. Reported board officers include Max Tegmark, Anthony Aguirre and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark; shared names are direct governance overlap with FLI. Full 2024 Lightcone filing did not render in web and XML download failed, so recipient detail in that return was not independently inspected. S13.</p>\n<p>FLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1.</p>\n<p>Current operational roles relevant to messaging: Ben Cumming communications director; Maggie Munro communications strategist; Chase Hardin US communications manager; Mark Brakel global policy director; Ben Eisenpress operations director; Andrea Berman grants manager. S11. FLI's Tallinn biography says he is also a CAIS board member, active angel investor and former DeepMind investor-director. That confirms a governance bridge to CAIS, not any campaign coordination or an FLI donation from DeepMind. S12. FLI's Krakovna biography identifies her as a DeepMind AI safety scientist (current undated self-description, no independent employment check). Supplemental source below.</p>\n<p>The current general people page contains no Elon Musk name or advisory roster. Historical Musk support is real, but current governing/advisory authority is not established here. FLI historical primary pages describe a USD 10m commitment in 2015, research-grant disbursements and a USD 2m 2018 allocation. These should not be equated to present campaign funding. Supplemental sources below.</p>\n<p>FLI's conflict policy, adopted February 24, 2024, requires disclosure, independent determination and recusals, compensation comparables and records. It also says common nonprofit affiliations alone do not establish conflicts. This is evidence of written policy, not evidence it was followed in each transaction. S10.</p>\n<h2>Typed edge register</h2>\n<p>Amounts USD unless marked unknown. 'Confirmed report' means reported in opened primary filing/page; it does not mean independently audited by this investigation.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Edge type</th>\n<th style=\"text-align:right\">Amount/currency</th>\n<th>Period</th>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Certainty / limits</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Vitalik Buterin / Shiba Inu support</td>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>charitable support enabling program</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">total gift unknown</td>\n<td>2021</td>\n<td>S9, S8</td>\n<td>Primary confirmation of support; USD25m was program announcement</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>multiyear existential-risk grant program</td>\n<td>planned allocation</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">25,000,000 USD</td>\n<td>2021 onward</td>\n<td>S9</td>\n<td>Announced program; not paid total</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>Lightcone Foundation 92-0636259</td>\n<td>cash/public-securities asset transfer</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">162,587,667 USD</td>\n<td>2022-12-15</td>\n<td>S2 Schedule N</td>\n<td>Confirmed report; fair-market value basis</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>FLI Europe</td>\n<td>cash/financial-assets transfer</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">180,297,079 USD</td>\n<td>2022-12-30</td>\n<td>S2 Schedule N</td>\n<td>Confirmed report; not campaign spend</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>Future of Life Foundation 88-0926067</td>\n<td>cash transfer</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">25,025,000 USD</td>\n<td>2022-12-11</td>\n<td>S2 Schedule N</td>\n<td>Confirmed report</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lightcone Foundation</td>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>related-entity contribution</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">21,050,000 USD</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S1 Schedule R, S3 cashflows</td>\n<td>Confirmed report; noncash investments</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>charitable organizations</td>\n<td>grant expense</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">7,262,618 USD</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S3 activities</td>\n<td>Accounting expense; separate from grants plus individual awards</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>grant/award recipients</td>\n<td>grants and similar amounts paid, Form990 label</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">7,457,618 USD</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S1 Part I</td>\n<td>Includes more than charitable-organization grants</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>media/outreach activity</td>\n<td>expenditure category</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">5,795,000 USD</td>\n<td>2025</td>\n<td>S8</td>\n<td>Self-published summary drawn from audit; not influencer-only</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>grant recipients</td>\n<td>expenditure category</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">26,724,000 USD</td>\n<td>2025</td>\n<td>S8</td>\n<td>Underlying full audit not obtained; payment/commitment split unavailable</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>Protect What's Human</td>\n<td>announced campaign budget ceiling</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">up to 8,000,000 USD</td>\n<td>2026</td>\n<td>S7</td>\n<td>Potential spend; no completed expenditure ledger</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>DMA creators</td>\n<td>planned funding envelope</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">up to 100,000 USD/month</td>\n<td>rolling current program</td>\n<td>S4</td>\n<td>Planned aggregate; do not multiply into actual annual spend</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>People First Marketing Inc</td>\n<td>Protect What's Human creators</td>\n<td>directed paid campaign production</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">unknown</td>\n<td>current public offer</td>\n<td>S5-S6</td>\n<td>Public offer/terms; completed individual payments not observed</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>Future of Life Foundation</td>\n<td>employee sharing</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">400,365 USD involved</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S1 Schedule R</td>\n<td>Not a donation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>Future of Life Foundation</td>\n<td>expense reimbursement</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">286,738 USD</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S1 Schedule R</td>\n<td>Reported transaction amount</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BAIF</td>\n<td>FLI</td>\n<td>expense reimbursement</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">73,577 USD</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S1 Schedule R</td>\n<td>Reported transaction amount</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Max Tegmark / Anthony Aguirre / Mihaela Chita-Tegmark</td>\n<td>FLI and Lightcone Foundation</td>\n<td>overlapping board/officer service</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">n/a</td>\n<td>2024</td>\n<td>S1, S13</td>\n<td>Governance overlap; no inference of misconduct</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Jaan Tallinn</td>\n<td>FLI and CAIS</td>\n<td>board memberships</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">n/a</td>\n<td>current bios</td>\n<td>S11-S12</td>\n<td>Confirmed self-reported bridge; no campaign coordination proof</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Jaan Tallinn</td>\n<td>DeepMind</td>\n<td>former investor-director</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">unknown</td>\n<td>historical</td>\n<td>S12</td>\n<td>Historical relationship; no company-to-campaign funding proof</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Financial snapshots that must not be conflated</h2>\n<p>2024 FLI, S1: revenue USD21,273,381; expenses USD17,399,051; assets USD6,348,222; net assets USD5,088,435; contributions USD21,136,620. S3 audit: cash USD440,106; investments USD3,684,898; digital assets USD31,395; noncash investment contributions USD21,050,000; proceeds from investment sales USD18,580,274. Noncash receipts and sale proceeds are distinct stages, not additive new donations.</p>\n<p>2025 FLI, S8: expense USD46,192,000, grant category USD26,724,000, media/outreach USD5,795,000. No 2025 consolidated asset total established.</p>\n<p>2024 Lightcone, S13: net assets USD174,320,788; expenses USD34,080,020; revenue USD9,723,116; contributions zero. Do not add its interaffiliate transfers to FLI expenses as independent public-persuasion spend.</p>\n<h2>Rival explanations and gaps</h2>\n<p>The direct evidence fits openly financed policy advocacy using standard creator-marketing contracts. Selection for preexisting agreement could create aligned content without changing creators' beliefs. Funding and approval create incentives and control over commissioned output, but cannot settle the truth of an AI-risk claim. Disclosure compliance in actual posts remains a separate empirical question.</p>\n<p>The donor/endowment structure supports durable institutional independence from new annual fundraising and may explain strategic divergence from Buterin. Conversely common boards and concentrated reserve funding mean the number of small donors says little about effective financial concentration. Neither observation establishes corrupt influence.</p>\n<p>No campaign-specific People First SOW, FLI-to-People-First invoice, itemized creator recipient/payment ledger, representative completed-post disclosure audit, or current consolidated endowment statements were obtained. USD665m commonly circulated as the 2021 gift was not verified from a primary valuation schedule here. Approximately USD500m liquidation is Buterin's reported recollection, not a cash-statement finding. Exact Jaan Tallinn lifetime gifts not established. Current Musk decision rights not established. Related nonprofits' shared control is documented but their full bylaws and all boards are not.</p>\n<p>The Washington Post count is from April 18, 2026: 30 DMA projects funded since the program launched in 2025, attributed to Cumming. It is NOT evidence that the report itself appeared in 2025, nor a count of People First campaign posts. S14. Keep derived text from this source under its unusually strict 25-word web allowance in public-facing output.</p>\n<h2>Best source register (15)</h2>\n<p>S1. FLI Form 990 for calendar 2024, signed/filed November 7, 2025. OPENED AND TARGET-READ: Part I (PDF p1), Part III (p2), Part VII (p7), Schedule R (pp52,54); tables also screenshot-requested. Primary return on Candid. <a href=\"https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf</a></p>\n<p>S2. FLI Form 990 for calendar 2022, filed January 30, 2025. OPENED AND TARGET-READ: Schedule N (PDF p49) and Schedule R (p55). Primary return on Candid. <a href=\"https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf</a></p>\n<p>S3. FLI audited financial statement tables, years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. OPENED AND READ all six pages: position p2, activities p3, functional expense p4-5, cashflows p6. Six-page public registry upload omits full auditor opinion/notes. <a href=\"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/25/9d/625474/2024-FLI-Audited-Financials.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/25/9d/625474/2024-FLI-Audited-Financials.pdf</a></p>\n<p>S4. FLI Digital Media Accelerator, undated current rolling application. OPENED AND READ; search extraction revealed complete application fields, including alignment, requested budget and planned USD100k/month. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/</a></p>\n<p>S5. People First Protect What's Human campaign recruitment, undated current. OPENED AND READ. <a href=\"https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/</a></p>\n<p>S6. People First Influencer Terms of Use, undated current. OPENED AND READ; sections 1-6, 9-13 most relevant. Scope of Work can supersede general terms. <a href=\"https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/</a></p>\n<p>S7. FLI campaign launch press release, February 9, 2026. OPENED AND READ. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/</a></p>\n<p>S8. FLI Finances, undated current, covers 2025 and donor/conflict claims. OPENED AND READ. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/</a></p>\n<p>S9. FLI announces USD25m existential-risk grants program, June 3, 2021. OPENED AND READ. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/</a></p>\n<p>S10. FLI Conflict of Interest Policy, adopted February 24, 2024. OPENED AND READ four-page PDF. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/conflict-of-interest-policy/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/conflict-of-interest-policy/</a></p>\n<p>S11. FLI Our People, undated current. OPENED AND READ board and functional leaders. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/</a></p>\n<p>S12. FLI Jaan Tallinn biography, undated current. OPENED AND READ; CAIS board and former DeepMind investor-director. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/</a></p>\n<p>S13. Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview, latest 2024 filing dated May 5, 2026; site updated August 20, 2026. OPENED AND READ 2022-2024 summaries and officers. Full filing wrapper opened but document not rendered. <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259</a></p>\n<p>S14. Washington Post, April 18, 2026, AI safety advocates ask content creators to tell the world of AI's dangers. OPENED AND READ relevant count/chronology sentence. SECONDARY and web allowance only 25 words. <a href=\"https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/04/18/ai-doom-influencers-safety/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/04/18/ai-doom-influencers-safety/</a></p>\n<p>S15. Cointelegraph, March 13, 2026, updated March 16 with FLI response. OPENED AND READ. SECONDARY carrying donor account and direct Aguirre response. <a href=\"https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation</a></p>\n<h2>Supplementary opened evidence and access boundaries</h2>\n<p>FLI FAQ corroborates donor-decision disclaimer and FLF mission division: <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/frequently-asked-questions/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/frequently-asked-questions/</a> (opened/read).</p>\n<p>Victoria Krakovna biography: <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/person/victoria-krakovna/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/person/victoria-krakovna/</a> (opened/read; identifies DeepMind scientist).</p>\n<p>CoinDesk donor-disagreement account March 13, 2026: <a href=\"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest</a> (opened/read). Primary linked Buterin post <a href=\"https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/2032296498181128441\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/2032296498181128441</a> returned 403, NOT READ directly.</p>\n<p>FLI March 4, 2026 Pro-Human declaration announcement: <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/</a> (opened/read; coalition endorsements not grants).</p>\n<p>FLI 2015 Musk USD10m pledge / USD7m initial grants primary pages were SEARCH-READ ONLY, not opened, so lower-ready: <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/ai/11m-ai-safety-research-program-launched/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/ai/11m-ai-safety-research-program-launched/</a> ; <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/newsletter/fli-september-2016-newsletter/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/newsletter/fli-september-2016-newsletter/</a> ; <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/ai/2-million-donated-to-keep-artificial-general-intelligence-beneficial-and-robust/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://futureoflife.org/ai/2-million-donated-to-keep-artificial-general-intelligence-beneficial-and-robust/</a> . First says commitment; second says more than USD2m paid to 37 research teams by fall 2015; third says USD2m allocated in 2018. Do not sum automatically: may be tranches of original pledge.</p>\n<p>FLI 2021 summary opened at <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/471052538\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/471052538</a> reports contributions USD670,530,459 and year-end assets USD537,164,374, but these are organization-wide amounts. Attempt to retrieve 2021 full IRS schedules failed (safe-open errors and XML security challenge); abandoned after alternate route. No inference that all contribution income was Buterin or cash.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes \n Research cutoff: 2026-09-05. Public-source inquiry only. All listed read states refer to this run. No outreach, accounts, private access, payments or publication. This document is a research handoff, not an allegation of wrongdoing. \n Findings that change the story \n Paid, directed creator work is established by primary sources. There are two mechanisms whose budgets and counts must remain separate: FLI's Digital Media Accelerator (DMA), and the Protect What's Human campaign offered through People First. DMA's application asks applicants to explain alignment with FLI's AI position and their own views, estimates organic impressions, and advertises planned support of up to USD 100,000 monthly across projects. Public wording contemplates limited constructive proposal feedback. People First's campaign describes following directions, submitting drafts, receiving feedback, publishing and receiving payment. Its current general terms go further: prepublication approvals, adherence to approved messaging, revision/removal rights, and possible withholding of compensation. Those terms also require FTC endorsement/disclosure compliance, forbid unsubstantiated claims and artificial engagement. These facts establish sponsored advocacy and editorial conditions; they do not establish undisclosed sponsorship in any particular post. The campaign-specific statement of work and completed creator payments remain unobserved. Sources S4-S6. \n FLI publicly launched the national Protect What's Human ad campaign on February 9, 2026, with a ceiling of up to USD 8 million and initial six/seven-figure investments in Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina. This is an announced campaign envelope, not an audited amount spent or an influencer-only budget. S7. \n The strongest financial finding is a related-endowment loop. FLI's 2022 IRS return reports a USD 162,587,667 transfer of cash/public securities to Lightcone Foundation, alongside USD 180,297,079 in cash/financial assets to FLI Europe and USD 25,025,000 cash to Future of Life Foundation. FLI's 2024 return then identifies Lightcone as a USD 21,050,000 contributor. This is 99.590% of FLI's USD 21,136,620 contributions that year (own calculation). The matching USD 21.05m appears in the audited cashflow as noncash investment contributions. Thus the large 2024 contribution is evidence of funding from an affiliated holding/grantmaking entity, not evidence of USD 21m newly raised from an independent outside donor. FLI-alone assets fell after asset transfers; do not call that disappearance or expenditure on persuasion. S1-S3. \n FLI's current finance page reports 2025 expenditure of USD 46.192m, including USD 26.724m grants and USD 5.795m media/outreach; it says contributed income was approximately USD 37,000 and investment income USD 152,000, with the gap covered by funds functioning as an endowment. The page says these figures derive from independently audited statements, but the underlying complete 2025 audit was not obtained. The latest FLI IRS return located covers 2024, not 2025. S8. \n The donor association does not by itself establish donor control. FLI describes Vitalik Buterin as by far its largest donor and the 2021 gift as unconditional; it says he has no formal or informal decision role, and makes Jaan Tallinn, a longstanding director, the exception to its donor-influence disclaimer. In March 2026 Buterin publicly criticized the later shift toward cultural/political action. His X post could not be read directly (403), so the roughly USD 500m SHIB liquidation figure and disagreement remain a donor account carried in reporting, not a verified liquidation ledger. Cointelegraph also carries Anthony Aguirre's reply emphasizing shared goals and continuing work on coordination, epistemics and technical safeguards. S8, S15. FLI's contemporaneous June 2021 announcement corroborates Buterin/Shiba Inu support and a USD 25m multiyear grant PROGRAM; that is not the total donation. S9. \n Entity and governance resolution \n FLI: Future of Life Institute, EIN 47-1052538, Pennsylvania legal domicile, formed 2014, section 501(c)(3). The 2024 return reports five voting board members, two independent, 29 employees. It identifies Anthony N Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn and Viktoriya Krakovna as directors/officers. Current website presents the same five under current names/roles: Anthony Aguirre (President and CEO), Jaan Tallinn (director), Max Tegmark (Founder and Chair), Meia Chita-Tegmark (Board Secretary), Victoria Krakovna (director). These are different date states, not contradictory office labels. S1, S11. \n Lightcone Foundation: EIN 92-0636259, Nevada, section 501(c)(3); this is NOT proven to be Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong, Lightcone Commons, or the unrelated Pittsburgh physics Lightcone Foundation. Name-based conflation would create a false network. Its 2024 IRS-derived overview gives net assets USD 174,320,788, assets USD 174,375,915, liabilities USD 55,127, and no contributions. Reported board officers include Max Tegmark, Anthony Aguirre and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark; shared names are direct governance overlap with FLI. Full 2024 Lightcone filing did not render in web and XML download failed, so recipient detail in that return was not independently inspected. S13. \n FLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1. \n Current operational roles relevant to messaging: Ben Cumming communications director; Maggie Munro communications strategist; Chase Hardin US communications manager; Mark Brakel global policy director; Ben Eisenpress operations director; Andrea Berman grants manager. S11. FLI's Tallinn biography says he is also a CAIS board member, active angel investor and former DeepMind investor-director. That confirms a governance bridge to CAIS, not any campaign coordination or an FLI donation from DeepMind. S12. FLI's Krakovna biography identifies her as a DeepMind AI safety scientist (current undated self-description, no independent employment check). Supplemental source below. \n The current general people page contains no Elon Musk name or advisory roster. Historical Musk support is real, but current governing/advisory authority is not established here. FLI historical primary pages describe a USD 10m commitment in 2015, research-grant disbursements and a USD 2m 2018 allocation. These should not be equated to present campaign funding. Supplemental sources below. \n FLI's conflict policy, adopted February 24, 2024, requires disclosure, independent determination and recusals, compensation comparables and records. It also says common nonprofit affiliations alone do not establish conflicts. This is evidence of written policy, not evidence it was followed in each transaction. S10. \n Typed edge register \n Amounts USD unless marked unknown. 'Confirmed report' means reported in opened primary filing/page; it does not mean independently audited by this investigation. \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Edge type \n Amount/currency \n Period \n Source \n Certainty / limits \n \n \n \n \n Vitalik Buterin / Shiba Inu support \n FLI \n charitable support enabling program \n total gift unknown \n 2021 \n S9, S8 \n Primary confirmation of support; USD25m was program announcement \n \n \n FLI \n multiyear existential-risk grant program \n planned allocation \n 25,000,000 USD \n 2021 onward \n S9 \n Announced program; not paid total \n \n \n FLI \n Lightcone Foundation 92-0636259 \n cash/public-securities asset transfer \n 162,587,667 USD \n 2022-12-15 \n S2 Schedule N \n Confirmed report; fair-market value basis \n \n \n FLI \n FLI Europe \n cash/financial-assets transfer \n 180,297,079 USD \n 2022-12-30 \n S2 Schedule N \n Confirmed report; not campaign spend \n \n \n FLI \n Future of Life Foundation 88-0926067 \n cash transfer \n 25,025,000 USD \n 2022-12-11 \n S2 Schedule N \n Confirmed report \n \n \n Lightcone Foundation \n FLI \n related-entity contribution \n 21,050,000 USD \n 2024 \n S1 Schedule R, S3 cashflows \n Confirmed report; noncash investments \n \n \n FLI \n charitable organizations \n grant expense \n 7,262,618 USD \n 2024 \n S3 activities \n Accounting expense; separate from grants plus individual awards \n \n \n FLI \n grant/award recipients \n grants and similar amounts paid, Form990 label \n 7,457,618 USD \n 2024 \n S1 Part I \n Includes more than charitable-organization grants \n \n \n FLI \n media/outreach activity \n expenditure category \n 5,795,000 USD \n 2025 \n S8 \n Self-published summary drawn from audit; not influencer-only \n \n \n FLI \n grant recipients \n expenditure category \n 26,724,000 USD \n 2025 \n S8 \n Underlying full audit not obtained; payment/commitment split unavailable \n \n \n FLI \n Protect What's Human \n announced campaign budget ceiling \n up to 8,000,000 USD \n 2026 \n S7 \n Potential spend; no completed expenditure ledger \n \n \n FLI \n DMA creators \n planned funding envelope \n up to 100,000 USD/month \n rolling current program \n S4 \n Planned aggregate; do not multiply into actual annual spend \n \n \n People First Marketing Inc \n Protect What's Human creators \n directed paid campaign production \n unknown \n current public offer \n S5-S6 \n Public offer/terms; completed individual payments not observed \n \n \n FLI \n Future of Life Foundation \n employee sharing \n 400,365 USD involved \n 2024 \n S1 Schedule R \n Not a donation \n \n \n FLI \n Future of Life Foundation \n expense reimbursement \n 286,738 USD \n 2024 \n S1 Schedule R \n Reported transaction amount \n \n \n BAIF \n FLI \n expense reimbursement \n 73,577 USD \n 2024 \n S1 Schedule R \n Reported transaction amount \n \n \n Max Tegmark / Anthony Aguirre / Mihaela Chita-Tegmark \n FLI and Lightcone Foundation \n overlapping board/officer service \n n/a \n 2024 \n S1, S13 \n Governance overlap; no inference of misconduct \n \n \n Jaan Tallinn \n FLI and CAIS \n board memberships \n n/a \n current bios \n S11-S12 \n Confirmed self-reported bridge; no campaign coordination proof \n \n \n Jaan Tallinn \n DeepMind \n former investor-director \n unknown \n historical \n S12 \n Historical relationship; no company-to-campaign funding proof \n \n \n \n Financial snapshots that must not be conflated \n 2024 FLI, S1: revenue USD21,273,381; expenses USD17,399,051; assets USD6,348,222; net assets USD5,088,435; contributions USD21,136,620. S3 audit: cash USD440,106; investments USD3,684,898; digital assets USD31,395; noncash investment contributions USD21,050,000; proceeds from investment sales USD18,580,274. Noncash receipts and sale proceeds are distinct stages, not additive new donations. \n 2025 FLI, S8: expense USD46,192,000, grant category USD26,724,000, media/outreach USD5,795,000. No 2025 consolidated asset total established. \n 2024 Lightcone, S13: net assets USD174,320,788; expenses USD34,080,020; revenue USD9,723,116; contributions zero. Do not add its interaffiliate transfers to FLI expenses as independent public-persuasion spend. \n Rival explanations and gaps \n The direct evidence fits openly financed policy advocacy using standard creator-marketing contracts. Selection for preexisting agreement could create aligned content without changing creators' beliefs. Funding and approval create incentives and control over commissioned output, but cannot settle the truth of an AI-risk claim. Disclosure compliance in actual posts remains a separate empirical question. \n The donor/endowment structure supports durable institutional independence from new annual fundraising and may explain strategic divergence from Buterin. Conversely common boards and concentrated reserve funding mean the number of small donors says little about effective financial concentration. Neither observation establishes corrupt influence. \n No campaign-specific People First SOW, FLI-to-People-First invoice, itemized creator recipient/payment ledger, representative completed-post disclosure audit, or current consolidated endowment statements were obtained. USD665m commonly circulated as the 2021 gift was not verified from a primary valuation schedule here. Approximately USD500m liquidation is Buterin's reported recollection, not a cash-statement finding. Exact Jaan Tallinn lifetime gifts not established. Current Musk decision rights not established. Related nonprofits' shared control is documented but their full bylaws and all boards are not. \n The Washington Post count is from April 18, 2026: 30 DMA projects funded since the program launched in 2025, attributed to Cumming. It is NOT evidence that the report itself appeared in 2025, nor a count of People First campaign posts. S14. Keep derived text from this source under its unusually strict 25-word web allowance in public-facing output. \n Best source register (15) \n S1. FLI Form 990 for calendar 2024, signed/filed November 7, 2025. OPENED AND TARGET-READ: Part I (PDF p1), Part III (p2), Part VII (p7), Schedule R (pp52,54); tables also screenshot-requested. Primary return on Candid.  https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf  \n S2. FLI Form 990 for calendar 2022, filed January 30, 2025. OPENED AND TARGET-READ: Schedule N (PDF p49) and Schedule R (p55). Primary return on Candid.  https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf  \n S3. FLI audited financial statement tables, years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. OPENED AND READ all six pages: position p2, activities p3, functional expense p4-5, cashflows p6. Six-page public registry upload omits full auditor opinion/notes.  https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/25/9d/625474/2024-FLI-Audited-Financials.pdf  \n S4. FLI Digital Media Accelerator, undated current rolling application. OPENED AND READ; search extraction revealed complete application fields, including alignment, requested budget and planned USD100k/month.  https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/  \n S5. People First Protect What's Human campaign recruitment, undated current. OPENED AND READ.  https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/  \n S6. People First Influencer Terms of Use, undated current. OPENED AND READ; sections 1-6, 9-13 most relevant. Scope of Work can supersede general terms.  https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/  \n S7. FLI campaign launch press release, February 9, 2026. OPENED AND READ.  https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/  \n S8. FLI Finances, undated current, covers 2025 and donor/conflict claims. OPENED AND READ.  https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/  \n S9. FLI announces USD25m existential-risk grants program, June 3, 2021. OPENED AND READ.  https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/  \n S10. FLI Conflict of Interest Policy, adopted February 24, 2024. OPENED AND READ four-page PDF.  https://futureoflife.org/conflict-of-interest-policy/  \n S11. FLI Our People, undated current. OPENED AND READ board and functional leaders.  https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/  \n S12. FLI Jaan Tallinn biography, undated current. OPENED AND READ; CAIS board and former DeepMind investor-director.  https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/  \n S13. Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview, latest 2024 filing dated May 5, 2026; site updated August 20, 2026. OPENED AND READ 2022-2024 summaries and officers. Full filing wrapper opened but document not rendered.  https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259  \n S14. Washington Post, April 18, 2026, AI safety advocates ask content creators to tell the world of AI's dangers. OPENED AND READ relevant count/chronology sentence. SECONDARY and web allowance only 25 words.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/04/18/ai-doom-influencers-safety/  \n S15. Cointelegraph, March 13, 2026, updated March 16 with FLI response. OPENED AND READ. SECONDARY carrying donor account and direct Aguirre response.  https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation  \n Supplementary opened evidence and access boundaries \n FLI FAQ corroborates donor-decision disclaimer and FLF mission division:  https://futureoflife.org/frequently-asked-questions/  (opened/read). \n Victoria Krakovna biography:  https://futureoflife.org/person/victoria-krakovna/  (opened/read; identifies DeepMind scientist). \n CoinDesk donor-disagreement account March 13, 2026:  https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest  (opened/read). Primary linked Buterin post  https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/2032296498181128441  returned 403, NOT READ directly. \n FLI March 4, 2026 Pro-Human declaration announcement:  https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/  (opened/read; coalition endorsements not grants). \n FLI 2015 Musk USD10m pledge / USD7m initial grants primary pages were SEARCH-READ ONLY, not opened, so lower-ready:  https://futureoflife.org/ai/11m-ai-safety-research-program-launched/  ;  https://futureoflife.org/newsletter/fli-september-2016-newsletter/  ;  https://futureoflife.org/ai/2-million-donated-to-keep-artificial-general-intelligence-beneficial-and-robust/  . First says commitment; second says more than USD2m paid to 37 research teams by fall 2015; third says USD2m allocated in 2018. Do not sum automatically: may be tranches of original pledge. \n FLI 2021 summary opened at  https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/471052538  reports contributions USD670,530,459 and year-end assets USD537,164,374, but these are organization-wide amounts. Attempt to retrieve 2021 full IRS schedules failed (safe-open errors and XML security challenge); abandoned after alternate route. No inference that all contribution income was Buterin or cash. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/fli/fli-evidence-notes.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# FLI / Protect What's Human evidence notes\n\nResearch cutoff: 2026-09-05. Public-source inquiry only. All listed read states refer to this run. No outreach, accounts, private access, payments or publication. This document is a research handoff, not an allegation of wrongdoing.\n\n## Findings that change the story\n\nPaid, directed creator work is established by primary sources. There are two mechanisms whose budgets and counts must remain separate: FLI's Digital Media Accelerator (DMA), and the Protect What's Human campaign offered through People First. DMA's application asks applicants to explain alignment with FLI's AI position and their own views, estimates organic impressions, and advertises planned support of up to USD 100,000 monthly across projects. Public wording contemplates limited constructive proposal feedback. People First's campaign describes following directions, submitting drafts, receiving feedback, publishing and receiving payment. Its current general terms go further: prepublication approvals, adherence to approved messaging, revision/removal rights, and possible withholding of compensation. Those terms also require FTC endorsement/disclosure compliance, forbid unsubstantiated claims and artificial engagement. These facts establish sponsored advocacy and editorial conditions; they do not establish undisclosed sponsorship in any particular post. The campaign-specific statement of work and completed creator payments remain unobserved. Sources S4-S6.\n\nFLI publicly launched the national Protect What's Human ad campaign on February 9, 2026, with a ceiling of up to USD 8 million and initial six/seven-figure investments in Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina. This is an announced campaign envelope, not an audited amount spent or an influencer-only budget. S7.\n\nThe strongest financial finding is a related-endowment loop. FLI's 2022 IRS return reports a USD 162,587,667 transfer of cash/public securities to Lightcone Foundation, alongside USD 180,297,079 in cash/financial assets to FLI Europe and USD 25,025,000 cash to Future of Life Foundation. FLI's 2024 return then identifies Lightcone as a USD 21,050,000 contributor. This is 99.590% of FLI's USD 21,136,620 contributions that year (own calculation). The matching USD 21.05m appears in the audited cashflow as noncash investment contributions. Thus the large 2024 contribution is evidence of funding from an affiliated holding/grantmaking entity, not evidence of USD 21m newly raised from an independent outside donor. FLI-alone assets fell after asset transfers; do not call that disappearance or expenditure on persuasion. S1-S3.\n\nFLI's current finance page reports 2025 expenditure of USD 46.192m, including USD 26.724m grants and USD 5.795m media/outreach; it says contributed income was approximately USD 37,000 and investment income USD 152,000, with the gap covered by funds functioning as an endowment. The page says these figures derive from independently audited statements, but the underlying complete 2025 audit was not obtained. The latest FLI IRS return located covers 2024, not 2025. S8.\n\nThe donor association does not by itself establish donor control. FLI describes Vitalik Buterin as by far its largest donor and the 2021 gift as unconditional; it says he has no formal or informal decision role, and makes Jaan Tallinn, a longstanding director, the exception to its donor-influence disclaimer. In March 2026 Buterin publicly criticized the later shift toward cultural/political action. His X post could not be read directly (403), so the roughly USD 500m SHIB liquidation figure and disagreement remain a donor account carried in reporting, not a verified liquidation ledger. Cointelegraph also carries Anthony Aguirre's reply emphasizing shared goals and continuing work on coordination, epistemics and technical safeguards. S8, S15. FLI's contemporaneous June 2021 announcement corroborates Buterin/Shiba Inu support and a USD 25m multiyear grant PROGRAM; that is not the total donation. S9.\n\n## Entity and governance resolution\n\nFLI: Future of Life Institute, EIN 47-1052538, Pennsylvania legal domicile, formed 2014, section 501(c)(3). The 2024 return reports five voting board members, two independent, 29 employees. It identifies Anthony N Aguirre, Mihaela Chita-Tegmark, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn and Viktoriya Krakovna as directors/officers. Current website presents the same five under current names/roles: Anthony Aguirre (President and CEO), Jaan Tallinn (director), Max Tegmark (Founder and Chair), Meia Chita-Tegmark (Board Secretary), Victoria Krakovna (director). These are different date states, not contradictory office labels. S1, S11.\n\nLightcone Foundation: EIN 92-0636259, Nevada, section 501(c)(3); this is NOT proven to be Lightcone Infrastructure/LessWrong, Lightcone Commons, or the unrelated Pittsburgh physics Lightcone Foundation. Name-based conflation would create a false network. Its 2024 IRS-derived overview gives net assets USD 174,320,788, assets USD 174,375,915, liabilities USD 55,127, and no contributions. Reported board officers include Max Tegmark, Anthony Aguirre and Mihaela Chita-Tegmark; shared names are direct governance overlap with FLI. Full 2024 Lightcone filing did not render in web and XML download failed, so recipient detail in that return was not independently inspected. S13.\n\nFLI 2024 Schedule R lists related tax-exempt entities: Lightcone Foundation; Future of Life Foundation (88-0926067); Improve the News Foundation (85-3391849); Beneficial AI Foundation (88-4400777); Civil Liberties Foundation (92-1349292); Social AI Research Institute (92-1366102); Future of Life Institute Europe (Swiss domicile). Its controlling-entity column names multiple affiliates. Treat as reported related/control relationships; do not simplify into a unidirectional parent/subsidiary tree without organizational documents. Schedule R explicitly reports sharing employees with FLF (USD 400,365) and BAIF (USD 66,273); reimbursements USD 286,738 from FLI to FLF and USD 73,577 from BAIF to FLI. Amounts are the filing's involved-transaction amounts, not independent donations. S1.\n\nCurrent operational roles relevant to messaging: Ben Cumming communications director; Maggie Munro communications strategist; Chase Hardin US communications manager; Mark Brakel global policy director; Ben Eisenpress operations director; Andrea Berman grants manager. S11. FLI's Tallinn biography says he is also a CAIS board member, active angel investor and former DeepMind investor-director. That confirms a governance bridge to CAIS, not any campaign coordination or an FLI donation from DeepMind. S12. FLI's Krakovna biography identifies her as a DeepMind AI safety scientist (current undated self-description, no independent employment check). Supplemental source below.\n\nThe current general people page contains no Elon Musk name or advisory roster. Historical Musk support is real, but current governing/advisory authority is not established here. FLI historical primary pages describe a USD 10m commitment in 2015, research-grant disbursements and a USD 2m 2018 allocation. These should not be equated to present campaign funding. Supplemental sources below.\n\nFLI's conflict policy, adopted February 24, 2024, requires disclosure, independent determination and recusals, compensation comparables and records. It also says common nonprofit affiliations alone do not establish conflicts. This is evidence of written policy, not evidence it was followed in each transaction. S10.\n\n## Typed edge register\n\nAmounts USD unless marked unknown. 'Confirmed report' means reported in opened primary filing/page; it does not mean independently audited by this investigation.\n\n| From | To | Edge type | Amount/currency | Period | Source | Certainty / limits |\n|---|---|---|---:|---|---|---|\n| Vitalik Buterin / Shiba Inu support | FLI | charitable support enabling program | total gift unknown | 2021 | S9, S8 | Primary confirmation of support; USD25m was program announcement |\n| FLI | multiyear existential-risk grant program | planned allocation | 25,000,000 USD | 2021 onward | S9 | Announced program; not paid total |\n| FLI | Lightcone Foundation 92-0636259 | cash/public-securities asset transfer | 162,587,667 USD | 2022-12-15 | S2 Schedule N | Confirmed report; fair-market value basis |\n| FLI | FLI Europe | cash/financial-assets transfer | 180,297,079 USD | 2022-12-30 | S2 Schedule N | Confirmed report; not campaign spend |\n| FLI | Future of Life Foundation 88-0926067 | cash transfer | 25,025,000 USD | 2022-12-11 | S2 Schedule N | Confirmed report |\n| Lightcone Foundation | FLI | related-entity contribution | 21,050,000 USD | 2024 | S1 Schedule R, S3 cashflows | Confirmed report; noncash investments |\n| FLI | charitable organizations | grant expense | 7,262,618 USD | 2024 | S3 activities | Accounting expense; separate from grants plus individual awards |\n| FLI | grant/award recipients | grants and similar amounts paid, Form990 label | 7,457,618 USD | 2024 | S1 Part I | Includes more than charitable-organization grants |\n| FLI | media/outreach activity | expenditure category | 5,795,000 USD | 2025 | S8 | Self-published summary drawn from audit; not influencer-only |\n| FLI | grant recipients | expenditure category | 26,724,000 USD | 2025 | S8 | Underlying full audit not obtained; payment/commitment split unavailable |\n| FLI | Protect What's Human | announced campaign budget ceiling | up to 8,000,000 USD | 2026 | S7 | Potential spend; no completed expenditure ledger |\n| FLI | DMA creators | planned funding envelope | up to 100,000 USD/month | rolling current program | S4 | Planned aggregate; do not multiply into actual annual spend |\n| People First Marketing Inc | Protect What's Human creators | directed paid campaign production | unknown | current public offer | S5-S6 | Public offer/terms; completed individual payments not observed |\n| FLI | Future of Life Foundation | employee sharing | 400,365 USD involved | 2024 | S1 Schedule R | Not a donation |\n| FLI | Future of Life Foundation | expense reimbursement | 286,738 USD | 2024 | S1 Schedule R | Reported transaction amount |\n| BAIF | FLI | expense reimbursement | 73,577 USD | 2024 | S1 Schedule R | Reported transaction amount |\n| Max Tegmark / Anthony Aguirre / Mihaela Chita-Tegmark | FLI and Lightcone Foundation | overlapping board/officer service | n/a | 2024 | S1, S13 | Governance overlap; no inference of misconduct |\n| Jaan Tallinn | FLI and CAIS | board memberships | n/a | current bios | S11-S12 | Confirmed self-reported bridge; no campaign coordination proof |\n| Jaan Tallinn | DeepMind | former investor-director | unknown | historical | S12 | Historical relationship; no company-to-campaign funding proof |\n\n## Financial snapshots that must not be conflated\n\n2024 FLI, S1: revenue USD21,273,381; expenses USD17,399,051; assets USD6,348,222; net assets USD5,088,435; contributions USD21,136,620. S3 audit: cash USD440,106; investments USD3,684,898; digital assets USD31,395; noncash investment contributions USD21,050,000; proceeds from investment sales USD18,580,274. Noncash receipts and sale proceeds are distinct stages, not additive new donations.\n\n2025 FLI, S8: expense USD46,192,000, grant category USD26,724,000, media/outreach USD5,795,000. No 2025 consolidated asset total established.\n\n2024 Lightcone, S13: net assets USD174,320,788; expenses USD34,080,020; revenue USD9,723,116; contributions zero. Do not add its interaffiliate transfers to FLI expenses as independent public-persuasion spend.\n\n## Rival explanations and gaps\n\nThe direct evidence fits openly financed policy advocacy using standard creator-marketing contracts. Selection for preexisting agreement could create aligned content without changing creators' beliefs. Funding and approval create incentives and control over commissioned output, but cannot settle the truth of an AI-risk claim. Disclosure compliance in actual posts remains a separate empirical question.\n\nThe donor/endowment structure supports durable institutional independence from new annual fundraising and may explain strategic divergence from Buterin. Conversely common boards and concentrated reserve funding mean the number of small donors says little about effective financial concentration. Neither observation establishes corrupt influence.\n\nNo campaign-specific People First SOW, FLI-to-People-First invoice, itemized creator recipient/payment ledger, representative completed-post disclosure audit, or current consolidated endowment statements were obtained. USD665m commonly circulated as the 2021 gift was not verified from a primary valuation schedule here. Approximately USD500m liquidation is Buterin's reported recollection, not a cash-statement finding. Exact Jaan Tallinn lifetime gifts not established. Current Musk decision rights not established. Related nonprofits' shared control is documented but their full bylaws and all boards are not.\n\nThe Washington Post count is from April 18, 2026: 30 DMA projects funded since the program launched in 2025, attributed to Cumming. It is NOT evidence that the report itself appeared in 2025, nor a count of People First campaign posts. S14. Keep derived text from this source under its unusually strict 25-word web allowance in public-facing output.\n\n## Best source register (15)\n\nS1. FLI Form 990 for calendar 2024, signed/filed November 7, 2025. OPENED AND TARGET-READ: Part I (PDF p1), Part III (p2), Part VII (p7), Schedule R (pp52,54); tables also screenshot-requested. Primary return on Candid. https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2024/471/052/2024-471052538-202523119349303667-9.pdf\n\nS2. FLI Form 990 for calendar 2022, filed January 30, 2025. OPENED AND TARGET-READ: Schedule N (PDF p49) and Schedule R (p55). Primary return on Candid. https://pdf.guidestar.org/PDF_Images/2022/471/052/2022-471052538-202510309349301606-.pdf\n\nS3. FLI audited financial statement tables, years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. OPENED AND READ all six pages: position p2, activities p3, functional expense p4-5, cashflows p6. Six-page public registry upload omits full auditor opinion/notes. https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/25/9d/625474/2024-FLI-Audited-Financials.pdf\n\nS4. FLI Digital Media Accelerator, undated current rolling application. OPENED AND READ; search extraction revealed complete application fields, including alignment, requested budget and planned USD100k/month. https://futureoflife.org/project/digital-media-accelerator/\n\nS5. People First Protect What's Human campaign recruitment, undated current. OPENED AND READ. https://join.peoplefirst.cc/campaign/protectwhatshuman/\n\nS6. People First Influencer Terms of Use, undated current. OPENED AND READ; sections 1-6, 9-13 most relevant. Scope of Work can supersede general terms. https://peoplefirst.cc/terms/\n\nS7. FLI campaign launch press release, February 9, 2026. OPENED AND READ. https://futureoflife.org/press-release/fli-launches-multimillion-dollar-nationwide-ai-regulation-campaign/\n\nS8. FLI Finances, undated current, covers 2025 and donor/conflict claims. OPENED AND READ. https://futureoflife.org/about-us/finances/\n\nS9. FLI announces USD25m existential-risk grants program, June 3, 2021. OPENED AND READ. https://futureoflife.org/grantmaking/fli-announces-grants-program-for-existential-risk-reduction/\n\nS10. FLI Conflict of Interest Policy, adopted February 24, 2024. OPENED AND READ four-page PDF. https://futureoflife.org/conflict-of-interest-policy/\n\nS11. FLI Our People, undated current. OPENED AND READ board and functional leaders. https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/\n\nS12. FLI Jaan Tallinn biography, undated current. OPENED AND READ; CAIS board and former DeepMind investor-director. https://futureoflife.org/person/jaan-tallinn/\n\nS13. Lightcone Foundation IRS-derived overview, latest 2024 filing dated May 5, 2026; site updated August 20, 2026. OPENED AND READ 2022-2024 summaries and officers. Full filing wrapper opened but document not rendered. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/920636259\n\nS14. Washington Post, April 18, 2026, AI safety advocates ask content creators to tell the world of AI's dangers. OPENED AND READ relevant count/chronology sentence. SECONDARY and web allowance only 25 words. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/04/18/ai-doom-influencers-safety/\n\nS15. Cointelegraph, March 13, 2026, updated March 16 with FLI response. OPENED AND READ. SECONDARY carrying donor account and direct Aguirre response. https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-future-of-life-institute-shib-donation\n\n## Supplementary opened evidence and access boundaries\n\nFLI FAQ corroborates donor-decision disclaimer and FLF mission division: https://futureoflife.org/frequently-asked-questions/ (opened/read).\n\nVictoria Krakovna biography: https://futureoflife.org/person/victoria-krakovna/ (opened/read; identifies DeepMind scientist).\n\nCoinDesk donor-disagreement account March 13, 2026: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-recounts-how-shiba-inu-tokens-became-a-usd1-billion-ai-policy-war-chest (opened/read). Primary linked Buterin post https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/2032296498181128441 returned 403, NOT READ directly.\n\nFLI March 4, 2026 Pro-Human declaration announcement: https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/ (opened/read; coalition endorsements not grants).\n\nFLI 2015 Musk USD10m pledge / USD7m initial grants primary pages were SEARCH-READ ONLY, not opened, so lower-ready: https://futureoflife.org/ai/11m-ai-safety-research-program-launched/ ; https://futureoflife.org/newsletter/fli-september-2016-newsletter/ ; https://futureoflife.org/ai/2-million-donated-to-keep-artificial-general-intelligence-beneficial-and-robust/ . First says commitment; second says more than USD2m paid to 37 research teams by fall 2015; third says USD2m allocated in 2018. Do not sum automatically: may be tranches of original pledge.\n\nFLI 2021 summary opened at https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/471052538 reports contributions USD670,530,459 and year-end assets USD537,164,374, but these are organization-wide amounts. Attempt to retrieve 2021 full IRS schedules failed (safe-open errors and XML security challenge); abandoned after alternate route. No inference that all contribution income was Buterin or cash."
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-controlai-findings",
        "title": "ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05</h1>\n<p>Public-source bounded investigation. No outreach, private access, paid services or publication. About 18 search queries plus targeted primary-source opens. This workstream does not establish who finances ControlAI upstream. It establishes legal control, accounting disclosure boundaries and a deliberately organized creator-to-policy influence mechanism.</p>\n<h2>Legal identity and control</h2>\n<p>ControlAI's own privacy notice identifies Secure Future Research Ltd as its registered UK name. Companies House number 15088415; incorporated 22 August 2023; private company limited by guarantee without share capital; SIC 70210, public relations and communications. It is not the unrelated CTRL AI LTD 15994292, ENERGY CONTROL AI LTD or similarly named AI businesses surfaced in search.</p>\n<p>Andrea Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens are the two active UK directors, appointed 22 August 2023. Each is also a person with significant control: more than 25% but no more than 50% voting rights, and right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moës was a director and PSC from incorporation until 7 November 2023. Do not turn Miotti's founder title into sole legal control. ControlAI's current about page identifies Andrea Miotti as founder/CEO, Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, Eva Behrens as Special Projects Lead, Max Winga as Creator Outreach &amp; Systems Lead, and Des Browne and Gabriel Alfour as advisors. It describes Leahy and Alfour as Conjecture cofounders and Alfour as having helped Andrea found ControlAI. This is personnel/organizational overlap, not proof of money transfers from Conjecture.</p>\n<p>US organization: CONTROL AI US, INC.; House lobbying registrant ID 77126, client/House ID 771260001. ControlAI and Germany's official lobby register identify it as a 501(c)(4). CauseIQ reports EIN 33-3361748. No US incorporation certificate, IRS determination letter or complete board roster was read in this pass.</p>\n<h2>Money and the accounting boundary</h2>\n<p>The UK 2025 accounts were filed and approved on 21 August 2026; first search snippet was stale and initially showed 2024. The current primary filing index and actual downloaded iXBRL establish the newer filing. Saved source: secure-future-research-accounts-2025.xhtml in this folder.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Balance-sheet item</th>\n<th style=\"text-align:right\">31 Dec 2025 GBP</th>\n<th style=\"text-align:right\">31 Dec 2024 GBP</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Fixed assets</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">20,219</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">29,786</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Current assets</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">7,587,477</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">5,455,883</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prepayments/accrued income</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">94,833</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">20,908</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Creditors within one year</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">85,716</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">379,994</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Net current assets</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">7,596,594</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">5,096,797</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total assets less current liabilities</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">7,616,813</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">5,126,583</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Accruals and deferred income</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">7,596,691</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">5,126,583</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Net assets / income and expenditure account</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">20,122</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">0</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Average employees including directors</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">9</td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">8</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>These are unaudited filleted micro-entity statements under FRS 105. The income and expenditure account was not delivered to the registrar, citing Companies Act s444(5A). The filing therefore gives no annual expenditure, donation revenue, creator spend or named donors. Current assets are not necessarily all cash; deferred income is not equivalent to unrestricted reserves; do not read the £7.6m balance sheet as an annual budget.</p>\n<p>CauseIQ's public extraction of a FY2025 US 990-EZ (received by IRS 23 June 2026 according to its index) reports contributions $136,570; miscellaneous revenues $377; total revenue $136,947; expenses $93,682; assets $69,178. The tax-return PDF failed retrieval and ProPublica was unavailable, so these amounts are aggregator-reported and not verified against the primary return. The difference between UK and US figures cannot be interpreted without cross-entity agreements/accounting scope.</p>\n<p>On 20 April 2026 ControlAI proposed scaling to a $50m yearly budget, with scenarios reaching $500m or $1bn. Those are fundraising targets and hypothetical deployment scenarios, not receipts. Its July 13 2026 grantmaking.ai application asks for $50k minimum / up to $1m to expand G7 parliamentary outreach excluding the US. It is an application, not an award. Neither source discloses existing donors. No primary evidence of a ControlAI grant or gift from Jaan Tallinn, SFF, FLI, Open Philanthropy, a fiscal sponsor or a donor-advised fund was located. That is a record boundary, not evidence of absence.</p>\n<h2>Creator and policy mechanism</h2>\n<p>ControlAI's April 20 plan reports 14 creator collaborations, a mix of paid and free, including Hank Green and Rational Animations. It reports 22 media publications separately. The 2025 impact report (December 2024 through January 2026) instead reports 18 media publications, 14 videos involving channels totaling 20m+ subscribers, over 30,000 people using its lawmaker-contact tools and 160,000+ messages. These are organization-reported impact metrics, not an independent attribution study.</p>\n<p>The creator outreach job is especially strong evidence about mechanism: reports to Head of Advocacy, identifies creator partners, conducts campaign outreach, briefs creators, drafts or reviews scripts, and keeps videos focused on AI extinction risk. Advertised salary is £60k–£80k. It proves an internal editorial-support/advocacy function; it does not prove the contractual veto rights or disclosure practices of every collaboration.</p>\n<p>The impact report says lawmaker outreach uses cold outreach, introductions and dinners, then briefings, campaign signatures, public statements and demands for government action, with conversion rates tracked. The organization explicitly aims to secure national and international prohibitions on superintelligence. Its claimed contribution to two January 2026 Lords debates is self-attributed in the report; this pass did not separately audit Hansard causation.</p>\n<p>Germany provides a concrete contracted lobbying edge: CONTROL AI US INC is registered R007795 (first entry 19 Jan 2026; last update 16 Mar 2026), operating in its own interest through third parties. Consultant Amir Benjamin Balde's register R007864 identifies Control AI US INC as his client for political education on existential AI risks. His filing lists 0 euros received for that client during calendar 2025; this does not establish zero compensation in 2026. The organization's German financial fields still state no fully completed financial year; this is the registry's disclosed state, and should not be generalized after a 2025 US tax-return summary has surfaced elsewhere.</p>\n<p>Frame Fellowship's website identifies Max Winga as a past mentor from Control AI and CAIS as a participating organization. That establishes shared creator-training infrastructure, not a transfer of funds or common control between ControlAI and CAIS. Frame advertises a $10,000 stipend plus accommodation/meals for its September–November 2026 cohort and distinguishes an independent editorial-control track from an organizational amplifier track. The site also reports FLI funding for fellow Mateus De Souza and CAIS contracts for Mikey Posada and Veronica Hylak; these are Frame's claims about those organizations' relationships, not evidence that ControlAI funded Frame.</p>\n<h2>Best sources and read status</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>ID</th>\n<th>Exact URL</th>\n<th>Date / period</th>\n<th>Read status / use</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>C01</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://controlai.org/privacy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/privacy</a></td>\n<td>Undated current page; read 2026-09-05</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary; UK trading-name bridge and supporter-action data mechanics</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C02</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415</a></td>\n<td>Incorporation 2023-08-22; current record</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary; UK entity identity</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C03</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history</a></td>\n<td>Accounts filed 2026-08-21, year to 2025-12-31</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary index; actual current iXBRL downloaded/read at <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1</a>&amp;format=xhtml</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C04</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers</a></td>\n<td>Current and former appointments since 2023</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary; directors</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C05</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control</a></td>\n<td>Current and former PSCs since 2023</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary; actual legal voting/director-appointment control</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C06</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://controlai.org/about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/about</a></td>\n<td>Current page, read 2026-09-05</td>\n<td>Opened/read organization primary; operational leadership and advisory roles</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C07</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan</a></td>\n<td>2026-04-20</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary; paid/free collaborations, fundraising targets and proposed allocation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C08</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf</a></td>\n<td>Dec 2024–Jan 2026; released 2026</td>\n<td>Opened/read 11-page primary PDF; metrics and influence sequence</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C09</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b</a></td>\n<td>Undated; indexed approximately spring 2026</td>\n<td>Opened/read primary employer posting; scriptwriting and creator recruitment function</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C10</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795</a></td>\n<td>First 2026-01-19; last change 2026-03-16</td>\n<td>Opened/read official registry; US entity and Germany activities, financial disclosure gap</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C11</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864</a></td>\n<td>First 2026-03-01; last change 2026-03-16; financial period 2025</td>\n<td>Opened/read official registry; Balde client and commissioned service</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C12</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/lookup.asp?reg_id=77126\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/lookup.asp?reg_id=77126</a></td>\n<td>Current retrieved 2026-09-05</td>\n<td>Opened/read official registry; registrant/client ID only, no spending validated</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C13</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/</a></td>\n<td>FY2025; IRS-received 2026-06-23; posted Aug 2026</td>\n<td>Opened/read secondary public extraction; PDF failed. Figures remain secondary</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C14</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://framefellowship.com/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://framefellowship.com/</a></td>\n<td>Cohort 2 Sept 7–Nov 15 2026; past mentor/participant claims</td>\n<td>Opened/read organization primary; shared infrastructure and editorial track distinctions</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C15</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f</a></td>\n<td>Application 2026-07-13</td>\n<td>Opened/read applicant text; request $50k–$1m, no award established</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Typed edges</h2>\n<p>Amounts marked null mean unknown/not a monetary edge, never zero.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Type</th>\n<th>Amount</th>\n<th>Currency</th>\n<th>Period</th>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Certainty and limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>trading_name</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current</td>\n<td>C01/C02</td>\n<td>Documented entity bridge</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>director_and_voting_control</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Since 2023-08-22</td>\n<td>C04/C05</td>\n<td>&gt;25–50% votes plus appoint/remove directors; not sole control</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>director_and_voting_control</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Since 2023-08-22</td>\n<td>C04/C05</td>\n<td>&gt;25–50% votes plus appoint/remove directors</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nicolas Moës</td>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>former_director_and_control</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>2023-08-22–2023-11-07</td>\n<td>C04/C05</td>\n<td>Historical, ceased</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Control AI US Inc</td>\n<td>chief_executive</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current German register</td>\n<td>C10</td>\n<td>Authorized representative; US board not independently mapped</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Connor Leahy</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>us_executive_director</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current</td>\n<td>C06</td>\n<td>Organization biography</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Gabriel Alfour</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>advisor_and_foundation_assistance</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current/historical</td>\n<td>C06</td>\n<td>Helped founder; no funding transfer established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Connor Leahy / Gabriel Alfour</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>cofounder_overlap</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Historical</td>\n<td>C06</td>\n<td>Personnel overlap only</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Unnamed contributors</td>\n<td>Control AI US Inc</td>\n<td>reported_contributions</td>\n<td>136570</td>\n<td>USD</td>\n<td>FY2025</td>\n<td>C13</td>\n<td>Secondary 990EZ extraction only; donor names unknown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>Creator collaborations</td>\n<td>paid_and_unpaid_content_partnership</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>By 2026-04-20</td>\n<td>C07</td>\n<td>14 collaborations, aggregate mix; individual contracts/payment amounts unknown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>Creator outreach employee</td>\n<td>advertised_salary</td>\n<td>60000–80000</td>\n<td>GBP/year</td>\n<td>Posting read 2026-09-05</td>\n<td>C09</td>\n<td>Advertised range, not paid payroll or creator fees</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Control AI US Inc</td>\n<td>Amir Benjamin Balde</td>\n<td>commissioned_lobbying_service</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Registered Mar 2026</td>\n<td>C10/C11</td>\n<td>Client documented; 2026 payment unknown; FY2025 declared receipts 0 EUR</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Max Winga / ControlAI</td>\n<td>Frame Fellowship</td>\n<td>past_mentor</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Prior cohort, current website</td>\n<td>C14</td>\n<td>Mentorship, no fiscal/control edge</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Frame Fellowship</td>\n<td>CAIS</td>\n<td>participating_organization</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>2026 cohort</td>\n<td>C14</td>\n<td>Institutional participation; no common control proved</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prospective funders</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>grant_application_request</td>\n<td>50000–1000000</td>\n<td>USD</td>\n<td>2026-07-13</td>\n<td>C15</td>\n<td>Application, not award or received money</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Strongest interpretation, rivals and gaps</h2>\n<p>The strongest supported story is a professional nonprofit advocacy operation deliberately joining paid and unpaid creator partnerships, script assistance, supporter mobilization and direct lobbying to seek a superintelligence ban. UK control is concentrated in two named people; its latest public balance sheet holds millions in assets offset largely by accruals/deferred income, while the filing omits the annual income/expenditure account. Donor identity, campaign-earmark conditions and creator fee schedules are not established.</p>\n<p>Rival explanation: mission-aligned philanthropy commonly funds professional communications, educational content and lobbying. These mechanisms are compatible with sincere risk beliefs and openly labeled partnerships. Shared mentors, conferences, scientific advisers and donor ecology can reflect a small field rather than common command. Neither payment nor script assistance proves a creator stated beliefs they did not hold, concealed sponsorship, or lacked editorial independence.</p>\n<p>Material gaps: named donors and amounts; conditions and renewal rights; UK/US intercompany transfers; US primary return and actual board; current US LD-1/LD-2 details; paid-vs-free roster for the 14 videos; contracts specifying editorial rights/disclosure; independent attribution of policy outcomes. Do not assert Tallinn, FLI, CAIS, SFF or Conjecture funded or controlled ControlAI on this record.</p>\n<p>Secondary lead not promoted to verified amount: OpenLobby reports $60k US lobbying spend across three 2025 quarterly filings and identifies Max Hernandez-Zapata, but underlying LD-2 returns were not read. <a href=\"https://www.openlobby.us/clients/control-ai-us-inc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.openlobby.us/clients/control-ai-us-inc</a></p>\n",
        "searchText": " ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05 \n Public-source bounded investigation. No outreach, private access, paid services or publication. About 18 search queries plus targeted primary-source opens. This workstream does not establish who finances ControlAI upstream. It establishes legal control, accounting disclosure boundaries and a deliberately organized creator-to-policy influence mechanism. \n Legal identity and control \n ControlAI's own privacy notice identifies Secure Future Research Ltd as its registered UK name. Companies House number 15088415; incorporated 22 August 2023; private company limited by guarantee without share capital; SIC 70210, public relations and communications. It is not the unrelated CTRL AI LTD 15994292, ENERGY CONTROL AI LTD or similarly named AI businesses surfaced in search. \n Andrea Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens are the two active UK directors, appointed 22 August 2023. Each is also a person with significant control: more than 25% but no more than 50% voting rights, and right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moës was a director and PSC from incorporation until 7 November 2023. Do not turn Miotti's founder title into sole legal control. ControlAI's current about page identifies Andrea Miotti as founder/CEO, Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, Eva Behrens as Special Projects Lead, Max Winga as Creator Outreach & Systems Lead, and Des Browne and Gabriel Alfour as advisors. It describes Leahy and Alfour as Conjecture cofounders and Alfour as having helped Andrea found ControlAI. This is personnel/organizational overlap, not proof of money transfers from Conjecture. \n US organization: CONTROL AI US, INC.; House lobbying registrant ID 77126, client/House ID 771260001. ControlAI and Germany's official lobby register identify it as a 501(c)(4). CauseIQ reports EIN 33-3361748. No US incorporation certificate, IRS determination letter or complete board roster was read in this pass. \n Money and the accounting boundary \n The UK 2025 accounts were filed and approved on 21 August 2026; first search snippet was stale and initially showed 2024. The current primary filing index and actual downloaded iXBRL establish the newer filing. Saved source: secure-future-research-accounts-2025.xhtml in this folder. \n \n \n \n Balance-sheet item \n 31 Dec 2025 GBP \n 31 Dec 2024 GBP \n \n \n \n \n Fixed assets \n 20,219 \n 29,786 \n \n \n Current assets \n 7,587,477 \n 5,455,883 \n \n \n Prepayments/accrued income \n 94,833 \n 20,908 \n \n \n Creditors within one year \n 85,716 \n 379,994 \n \n \n Net current assets \n 7,596,594 \n 5,096,797 \n \n \n Total assets less current liabilities \n 7,616,813 \n 5,126,583 \n \n \n Accruals and deferred income \n 7,596,691 \n 5,126,583 \n \n \n Net assets / income and expenditure account \n 20,122 \n 0 \n \n \n Average employees including directors \n 9 \n 8 \n \n \n \n These are unaudited filleted micro-entity statements under FRS 105. The income and expenditure account was not delivered to the registrar, citing Companies Act s444(5A). The filing therefore gives no annual expenditure, donation revenue, creator spend or named donors. Current assets are not necessarily all cash; deferred income is not equivalent to unrestricted reserves; do not read the £7.6m balance sheet as an annual budget. \n CauseIQ's public extraction of a FY2025 US 990-EZ (received by IRS 23 June 2026 according to its index) reports contributions $136,570; miscellaneous revenues $377; total revenue $136,947; expenses $93,682; assets $69,178. The tax-return PDF failed retrieval and ProPublica was unavailable, so these amounts are aggregator-reported and not verified against the primary return. The difference between UK and US figures cannot be interpreted without cross-entity agreements/accounting scope. \n On 20 April 2026 ControlAI proposed scaling to a $50m yearly budget, with scenarios reaching $500m or $1bn. Those are fundraising targets and hypothetical deployment scenarios, not receipts. Its July 13 2026 grantmaking.ai application asks for $50k minimum / up to $1m to expand G7 parliamentary outreach excluding the US. It is an application, not an award. Neither source discloses existing donors. No primary evidence of a ControlAI grant or gift from Jaan Tallinn, SFF, FLI, Open Philanthropy, a fiscal sponsor or a donor-advised fund was located. That is a record boundary, not evidence of absence. \n Creator and policy mechanism \n ControlAI's April 20 plan reports 14 creator collaborations, a mix of paid and free, including Hank Green and Rational Animations. It reports 22 media publications separately. The 2025 impact report (December 2024 through January 2026) instead reports 18 media publications, 14 videos involving channels totaling 20m+ subscribers, over 30,000 people using its lawmaker-contact tools and 160,000+ messages. These are organization-reported impact metrics, not an independent attribution study. \n The creator outreach job is especially strong evidence about mechanism: reports to Head of Advocacy, identifies creator partners, conducts campaign outreach, briefs creators, drafts or reviews scripts, and keeps videos focused on AI extinction risk. Advertised salary is £60k–£80k. It proves an internal editorial-support/advocacy function; it does not prove the contractual veto rights or disclosure practices of every collaboration. \n The impact report says lawmaker outreach uses cold outreach, introductions and dinners, then briefings, campaign signatures, public statements and demands for government action, with conversion rates tracked. The organization explicitly aims to secure national and international prohibitions on superintelligence. Its claimed contribution to two January 2026 Lords debates is self-attributed in the report; this pass did not separately audit Hansard causation. \n Germany provides a concrete contracted lobbying edge: CONTROL AI US INC is registered R007795 (first entry 19 Jan 2026; last update 16 Mar 2026), operating in its own interest through third parties. Consultant Amir Benjamin Balde's register R007864 identifies Control AI US INC as his client for political education on existential AI risks. His filing lists 0 euros received for that client during calendar 2025; this does not establish zero compensation in 2026. The organization's German financial fields still state no fully completed financial year; this is the registry's disclosed state, and should not be generalized after a 2025 US tax-return summary has surfaced elsewhere. \n Frame Fellowship's website identifies Max Winga as a past mentor from Control AI and CAIS as a participating organization. That establishes shared creator-training infrastructure, not a transfer of funds or common control between ControlAI and CAIS. Frame advertises a $10,000 stipend plus accommodation/meals for its September–November 2026 cohort and distinguishes an independent editorial-control track from an organizational amplifier track. The site also reports FLI funding for fellow Mateus De Souza and CAIS contracts for Mikey Posada and Veronica Hylak; these are Frame's claims about those organizations' relationships, not evidence that ControlAI funded Frame. \n Best sources and read status \n \n \n \n ID \n Exact URL \n Date / period \n Read status / use \n \n \n \n \n C01 \n  https://controlai.org/privacy  \n Undated current page; read 2026-09-05 \n Opened/read primary; UK trading-name bridge and supporter-action data mechanics \n \n \n C02 \n  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415  \n Incorporation 2023-08-22; current record \n Opened/read primary; UK entity identity \n \n \n C03 \n  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history  \n Accounts filed 2026-08-21, year to 2025-12-31 \n Opened/read primary index; actual current iXBRL downloaded/read at  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1 &format=xhtml \n \n \n C04 \n  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers  \n Current and former appointments since 2023 \n Opened/read primary; directors \n \n \n C05 \n  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control  \n Current and former PSCs since 2023 \n Opened/read primary; actual legal voting/director-appointment control \n \n \n C06 \n  https://controlai.org/about  \n Current page, read 2026-09-05 \n Opened/read organization primary; operational leadership and advisory roles \n \n \n C07 \n  https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan  \n 2026-04-20 \n Opened/read primary; paid/free collaborations, fundraising targets and proposed allocation \n \n \n C08 \n  https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf  \n Dec 2024–Jan 2026; released 2026 \n Opened/read 11-page primary PDF; metrics and influence sequence \n \n \n C09 \n  https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b  \n Undated; indexed approximately spring 2026 \n Opened/read primary employer posting; scriptwriting and creator recruitment function \n \n \n C10 \n  https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795  \n First 2026-01-19; last change 2026-03-16 \n Opened/read official registry; US entity and Germany activities, financial disclosure gap \n \n \n C11 \n  https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864  \n First 2026-03-01; last change 2026-03-16; financial period 2025 \n Opened/read official registry; Balde client and commissioned service \n \n \n C12 \n  https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/lookup.asp?reg_id=77126  \n Current retrieved 2026-09-05 \n Opened/read official registry; registrant/client ID only, no spending validated \n \n \n C13 \n  https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/  \n FY2025; IRS-received 2026-06-23; posted Aug 2026 \n Opened/read secondary public extraction; PDF failed. Figures remain secondary \n \n \n C14 \n  https://framefellowship.com/  \n Cohort 2 Sept 7–Nov 15 2026; past mentor/participant claims \n Opened/read organization primary; shared infrastructure and editorial track distinctions \n \n \n C15 \n  https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f  \n Application 2026-07-13 \n Opened/read applicant text; request $50k–$1m, no award established \n \n \n \n Typed edges \n Amounts marked null mean unknown/not a monetary edge, never zero. \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Type \n Amount \n Currency \n Period \n Source \n Certainty and limit \n \n \n \n \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n ControlAI \n trading_name \n null \n null \n Current \n C01/C02 \n Documented entity bridge \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n director_and_voting_control \n null \n null \n Since 2023-08-22 \n C04/C05 \n >25–50% votes plus appoint/remove directors; not sole control \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n director_and_voting_control \n null \n null \n Since 2023-08-22 \n C04/C05 \n >25–50% votes plus appoint/remove directors \n \n \n Nicolas Moës \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n former_director_and_control \n null \n null \n 2023-08-22–2023-11-07 \n C04/C05 \n Historical, ceased \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Control AI US Inc \n chief_executive \n null \n null \n Current German register \n C10 \n Authorized representative; US board not independently mapped \n \n \n Connor Leahy \n ControlAI \n us_executive_director \n null \n null \n Current \n C06 \n Organization biography \n \n \n Gabriel Alfour \n ControlAI \n advisor_and_foundation_assistance \n null \n null \n Current/historical \n C06 \n Helped founder; no funding transfer established \n \n \n Connor Leahy / Gabriel Alfour \n Conjecture \n cofounder_overlap \n null \n null \n Historical \n C06 \n Personnel overlap only \n \n \n Unnamed contributors \n Control AI US Inc \n reported_contributions \n 136570 \n USD \n FY2025 \n C13 \n Secondary 990EZ extraction only; donor names unknown \n \n \n ControlAI \n Creator collaborations \n paid_and_unpaid_content_partnership \n null \n null \n By 2026-04-20 \n C07 \n 14 collaborations, aggregate mix; individual contracts/payment amounts unknown \n \n \n ControlAI \n Creator outreach employee \n advertised_salary \n 60000–80000 \n GBP/year \n Posting read 2026-09-05 \n C09 \n Advertised range, not paid payroll or creator fees \n \n \n Control AI US Inc \n Amir Benjamin Balde \n commissioned_lobbying_service \n null \n null \n Registered Mar 2026 \n C10/C11 \n Client documented; 2026 payment unknown; FY2025 declared receipts 0 EUR \n \n \n Max Winga / ControlAI \n Frame Fellowship \n past_mentor \n null \n null \n Prior cohort, current website \n C14 \n Mentorship, no fiscal/control edge \n \n \n Frame Fellowship \n CAIS \n participating_organization \n null \n null \n 2026 cohort \n C14 \n Institutional participation; no common control proved \n \n \n Prospective funders \n ControlAI \n grant_application_request \n 50000–1000000 \n USD \n 2026-07-13 \n C15 \n Application, not award or received money \n \n \n \n Strongest interpretation, rivals and gaps \n The strongest supported story is a professional nonprofit advocacy operation deliberately joining paid and unpaid creator partnerships, script assistance, supporter mobilization and direct lobbying to seek a superintelligence ban. UK control is concentrated in two named people; its latest public balance sheet holds millions in assets offset largely by accruals/deferred income, while the filing omits the annual income/expenditure account. Donor identity, campaign-earmark conditions and creator fee schedules are not established. \n Rival explanation: mission-aligned philanthropy commonly funds professional communications, educational content and lobbying. These mechanisms are compatible with sincere risk beliefs and openly labeled partnerships. Shared mentors, conferences, scientific advisers and donor ecology can reflect a small field rather than common command. Neither payment nor script assistance proves a creator stated beliefs they did not hold, concealed sponsorship, or lacked editorial independence. \n Material gaps: named donors and amounts; conditions and renewal rights; UK/US intercompany transfers; US primary return and actual board; current US LD-1/LD-2 details; paid-vs-free roster for the 14 videos; contracts specifying editorial rights/disclosure; independent attribution of policy outcomes. Do not assert Tallinn, FLI, CAIS, SFF or Conjecture funded or controlled ControlAI on this record. \n Secondary lead not promoted to verified amount: OpenLobby reports $60k US lobbying spend across three 2025 quarterly filings and identifies Max Hernandez-Zapata, but underlying LD-2 returns were not read.  https://www.openlobby.us/clients/control-ai-us-inc  \n",
        "path": "workstreams/controlai/findings.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# ControlAI evidence findings — 2026-09-05\n\nPublic-source bounded investigation. No outreach, private access, paid services or publication. About 18 search queries plus targeted primary-source opens. This workstream does not establish who finances ControlAI upstream. It establishes legal control, accounting disclosure boundaries and a deliberately organized creator-to-policy influence mechanism.\n\n## Legal identity and control\n\nControlAI's own privacy notice identifies Secure Future Research Ltd as its registered UK name. Companies House number 15088415; incorporated 22 August 2023; private company limited by guarantee without share capital; SIC 70210, public relations and communications. It is not the unrelated CTRL AI LTD 15994292, ENERGY CONTROL AI LTD or similarly named AI businesses surfaced in search.\n\nAndrea Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens are the two active UK directors, appointed 22 August 2023. Each is also a person with significant control: more than 25% but no more than 50% voting rights, and right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moës was a director and PSC from incorporation until 7 November 2023. Do not turn Miotti's founder title into sole legal control. ControlAI's current about page identifies Andrea Miotti as founder/CEO, Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, Eva Behrens as Special Projects Lead, Max Winga as Creator Outreach & Systems Lead, and Des Browne and Gabriel Alfour as advisors. It describes Leahy and Alfour as Conjecture cofounders and Alfour as having helped Andrea found ControlAI. This is personnel/organizational overlap, not proof of money transfers from Conjecture.\n\nUS organization: CONTROL AI US, INC.; House lobbying registrant ID 77126, client/House ID 771260001. ControlAI and Germany's official lobby register identify it as a 501(c)(4). CauseIQ reports EIN 33-3361748. No US incorporation certificate, IRS determination letter or complete board roster was read in this pass.\n\n## Money and the accounting boundary\n\nThe UK 2025 accounts were filed and approved on 21 August 2026; first search snippet was stale and initially showed 2024. The current primary filing index and actual downloaded iXBRL establish the newer filing. Saved source: secure-future-research-accounts-2025.xhtml in this folder.\n\n| Balance-sheet item | 31 Dec 2025 GBP | 31 Dec 2024 GBP |\n|---|---:|---:|\n| Fixed assets | 20,219 | 29,786 |\n| Current assets | 7,587,477 | 5,455,883 |\n| Prepayments/accrued income | 94,833 | 20,908 |\n| Creditors within one year | 85,716 | 379,994 |\n| Net current assets | 7,596,594 | 5,096,797 |\n| Total assets less current liabilities | 7,616,813 | 5,126,583 |\n| Accruals and deferred income | 7,596,691 | 5,126,583 |\n| Net assets / income and expenditure account | 20,122 | 0 |\n| Average employees including directors | 9 | 8 |\n\nThese are unaudited filleted micro-entity statements under FRS 105. The income and expenditure account was not delivered to the registrar, citing Companies Act s444(5A). The filing therefore gives no annual expenditure, donation revenue, creator spend or named donors. Current assets are not necessarily all cash; deferred income is not equivalent to unrestricted reserves; do not read the £7.6m balance sheet as an annual budget.\n\nCauseIQ's public extraction of a FY2025 US 990-EZ (received by IRS 23 June 2026 according to its index) reports contributions $136,570; miscellaneous revenues $377; total revenue $136,947; expenses $93,682; assets $69,178. The tax-return PDF failed retrieval and ProPublica was unavailable, so these amounts are aggregator-reported and not verified against the primary return. The difference between UK and US figures cannot be interpreted without cross-entity agreements/accounting scope.\n\nOn 20 April 2026 ControlAI proposed scaling to a $50m yearly budget, with scenarios reaching $500m or $1bn. Those are fundraising targets and hypothetical deployment scenarios, not receipts. Its July 13 2026 grantmaking.ai application asks for $50k minimum / up to $1m to expand G7 parliamentary outreach excluding the US. It is an application, not an award. Neither source discloses existing donors. No primary evidence of a ControlAI grant or gift from Jaan Tallinn, SFF, FLI, Open Philanthropy, a fiscal sponsor or a donor-advised fund was located. That is a record boundary, not evidence of absence.\n\n## Creator and policy mechanism\n\nControlAI's April 20 plan reports 14 creator collaborations, a mix of paid and free, including Hank Green and Rational Animations. It reports 22 media publications separately. The 2025 impact report (December 2024 through January 2026) instead reports 18 media publications, 14 videos involving channels totaling 20m+ subscribers, over 30,000 people using its lawmaker-contact tools and 160,000+ messages. These are organization-reported impact metrics, not an independent attribution study.\n\nThe creator outreach job is especially strong evidence about mechanism: reports to Head of Advocacy, identifies creator partners, conducts campaign outreach, briefs creators, drafts or reviews scripts, and keeps videos focused on AI extinction risk. Advertised salary is £60k–£80k. It proves an internal editorial-support/advocacy function; it does not prove the contractual veto rights or disclosure practices of every collaboration.\n\nThe impact report says lawmaker outreach uses cold outreach, introductions and dinners, then briefings, campaign signatures, public statements and demands for government action, with conversion rates tracked. The organization explicitly aims to secure national and international prohibitions on superintelligence. Its claimed contribution to two January 2026 Lords debates is self-attributed in the report; this pass did not separately audit Hansard causation.\n\nGermany provides a concrete contracted lobbying edge: CONTROL AI US INC is registered R007795 (first entry 19 Jan 2026; last update 16 Mar 2026), operating in its own interest through third parties. Consultant Amir Benjamin Balde's register R007864 identifies Control AI US INC as his client for political education on existential AI risks. His filing lists 0 euros received for that client during calendar 2025; this does not establish zero compensation in 2026. The organization's German financial fields still state no fully completed financial year; this is the registry's disclosed state, and should not be generalized after a 2025 US tax-return summary has surfaced elsewhere.\n\nFrame Fellowship's website identifies Max Winga as a past mentor from Control AI and CAIS as a participating organization. That establishes shared creator-training infrastructure, not a transfer of funds or common control between ControlAI and CAIS. Frame advertises a $10,000 stipend plus accommodation/meals for its September–November 2026 cohort and distinguishes an independent editorial-control track from an organizational amplifier track. The site also reports FLI funding for fellow Mateus De Souza and CAIS contracts for Mikey Posada and Veronica Hylak; these are Frame's claims about those organizations' relationships, not evidence that ControlAI funded Frame.\n\n## Best sources and read status\n\n| ID | Exact URL | Date / period | Read status / use |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| C01 | https://controlai.org/privacy | Undated current page; read 2026-09-05 | Opened/read primary; UK trading-name bridge and supporter-action data mechanics |\n| C02 | https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415 | Incorporation 2023-08-22; current record | Opened/read primary; UK entity identity |\n| C03 | https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history | Accounts filed 2026-08-21, year to 2025-12-31 | Opened/read primary index; actual current iXBRL downloaded/read at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=1&format=xhtml |\n| C04 | https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers | Current and former appointments since 2023 | Opened/read primary; directors |\n| C05 | https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control | Current and former PSCs since 2023 | Opened/read primary; actual legal voting/director-appointment control |\n| C06 | https://controlai.org/about | Current page, read 2026-09-05 | Opened/read organization primary; operational leadership and advisory roles |\n| C07 | https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan | 2026-04-20 | Opened/read primary; paid/free collaborations, fundraising targets and proposed allocation |\n| C08 | https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf | Dec 2024–Jan 2026; released 2026 | Opened/read 11-page primary PDF; metrics and influence sequence |\n| C09 | https://jobs.eu.lever.co/controlai/9e58f381-34ed-4e65-90e7-8a31e6a2b16b | Undated; indexed approximately spring 2026 | Opened/read primary employer posting; scriptwriting and creator recruitment function |\n| C10 | https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795 | First 2026-01-19; last change 2026-03-16 | Opened/read official registry; US entity and Germany activities, financial disclosure gap |\n| C11 | https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007864 | First 2026-03-01; last change 2026-03-16; financial period 2025 | Opened/read official registry; Balde client and commissioned service |\n| C12 | https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/lookup.asp?reg_id=77126 | Current retrieved 2026-09-05 | Opened/read official registry; registrant/client ID only, no spending validated |\n| C13 | https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/ | FY2025; IRS-received 2026-06-23; posted Aug 2026 | Opened/read secondary public extraction; PDF failed. Figures remain secondary |\n| C14 | https://framefellowship.com/ | Cohort 2 Sept 7–Nov 15 2026; past mentor/participant claims | Opened/read organization primary; shared infrastructure and editorial track distinctions |\n| C15 | https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f | Application 2026-07-13 | Opened/read applicant text; request $50k–$1m, no award established |\n\n## Typed edges\n\nAmounts marked null mean unknown/not a monetary edge, never zero.\n\n| From | To | Type | Amount | Currency | Period | Source | Certainty and limit |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Secure Future Research Ltd | ControlAI | trading_name | null | null | Current | C01/C02 | Documented entity bridge |\n| Andrea Miotti | Secure Future Research Ltd | director_and_voting_control | null | null | Since 2023-08-22 | C04/C05 | >25–50% votes plus appoint/remove directors; not sole control |\n| Eva Behrens | Secure Future Research Ltd | director_and_voting_control | null | null | Since 2023-08-22 | C04/C05 | >25–50% votes plus appoint/remove directors |\n| Nicolas Moës | Secure Future Research Ltd | former_director_and_control | null | null | 2023-08-22–2023-11-07 | C04/C05 | Historical, ceased |\n| Andrea Miotti | Control AI US Inc | chief_executive | null | null | Current German register | C10 | Authorized representative; US board not independently mapped |\n| Connor Leahy | ControlAI | us_executive_director | null | null | Current | C06 | Organization biography |\n| Gabriel Alfour | ControlAI | advisor_and_foundation_assistance | null | null | Current/historical | C06 | Helped founder; no funding transfer established |\n| Connor Leahy / Gabriel Alfour | Conjecture | cofounder_overlap | null | null | Historical | C06 | Personnel overlap only |\n| Unnamed contributors | Control AI US Inc | reported_contributions | 136570 | USD | FY2025 | C13 | Secondary 990EZ extraction only; donor names unknown |\n| ControlAI | Creator collaborations | paid_and_unpaid_content_partnership | null | null | By 2026-04-20 | C07 | 14 collaborations, aggregate mix; individual contracts/payment amounts unknown |\n| ControlAI | Creator outreach employee | advertised_salary | 60000–80000 | GBP/year | Posting read 2026-09-05 | C09 | Advertised range, not paid payroll or creator fees |\n| Control AI US Inc | Amir Benjamin Balde | commissioned_lobbying_service | null | null | Registered Mar 2026 | C10/C11 | Client documented; 2026 payment unknown; FY2025 declared receipts 0 EUR |\n| Max Winga / ControlAI | Frame Fellowship | past_mentor | null | null | Prior cohort, current website | C14 | Mentorship, no fiscal/control edge |\n| Frame Fellowship | CAIS | participating_organization | null | null | 2026 cohort | C14 | Institutional participation; no common control proved |\n| Prospective funders | ControlAI | grant_application_request | 50000–1000000 | USD | 2026-07-13 | C15 | Application, not award or received money |\n\n## Strongest interpretation, rivals and gaps\n\nThe strongest supported story is a professional nonprofit advocacy operation deliberately joining paid and unpaid creator partnerships, script assistance, supporter mobilization and direct lobbying to seek a superintelligence ban. UK control is concentrated in two named people; its latest public balance sheet holds millions in assets offset largely by accruals/deferred income, while the filing omits the annual income/expenditure account. Donor identity, campaign-earmark conditions and creator fee schedules are not established.\n\nRival explanation: mission-aligned philanthropy commonly funds professional communications, educational content and lobbying. These mechanisms are compatible with sincere risk beliefs and openly labeled partnerships. Shared mentors, conferences, scientific advisers and donor ecology can reflect a small field rather than common command. Neither payment nor script assistance proves a creator stated beliefs they did not hold, concealed sponsorship, or lacked editorial independence.\n\nMaterial gaps: named donors and amounts; conditions and renewal rights; UK/US intercompany transfers; US primary return and actual board; current US LD-1/LD-2 details; paid-vs-free roster for the 14 videos; contracts specifying editorial rights/disclosure; independent attribution of policy outcomes. Do not assert Tallinn, FLI, CAIS, SFF or Conjecture funded or controlled ControlAI on this record.\n\nSecondary lead not promoted to verified amount: OpenLobby reports $60k US lobbying spend across three 2025 quarterly filings and identifies Max Hernandez-Zapata, but underlying LD-2 returns were not read. https://www.openlobby.us/clients/control-ai-us-inc\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-controlai-miotti-connections",
        "title": "Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections</h1>\n<p>Research cut-off: 5 September 2026. Public sources only; no outreach or private access. This follow-up maps employment, formal authority, investment in a former employer, policy collaboration and political access. It does not infer common command from association. Earlier ControlAI evidence is preserved in findings.md in this directory.</p>\n<h2>Most consequential findings</h2>\n<p>Miotti's strongest institutional bridge is Conjecture. An organizer's September 2022 event page identifies him as its Head of AI Policy and Governance; his September 2025 UK parliamentary submission calls his earlier job Head of Strategy and Governance. A June 2025 Apart Research event still describes him as an adviser to Conjecture, alongside his ControlAI leadership. Thus this was both employment and a later advisory connection. Conjecture's own founding announcement names Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour as founders; it does not name Miotti as a cofounder. [M01, M02, M03, M04]</p>\n<p>Conjecture disclosed venture backing in April 2022 from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy and Sam Bankman-Fried, among others. It also said its founders retained complete company control. This is a documented investor network around Miotti's former employer. No investor amount, current ownership, investment in Miotti personally, or donation to ControlAI follows from it. [M04]</p>\n<p>The bridge persists through people with current ControlAI roles: its about page identifies Conjecture cofounder Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, and Conjecture cofounder Gabriel Alfour as an adviser who helped Andrea establish ControlAI. The same page lists former UK Defence Secretary Des Browne as adviser, identifying his Nuclear Threat Initiative and European Leadership Network leadership. These are specific organizational access channels; their outside institutions are not thereby ControlAI funders or endorsers. [M05]</p>\n<p>There is direct political access in the official record. Miotti testified remotely to Canada's Commons ethics committee on 26 January 2026 alongside Steven Adler, who appeared as an individual. Miotti said ControlAI had been invited to present a bill banning superintelligence to the UK Prime Minister's office, and that the bill had not passed. The committee appearance is independently documented; the No.10 invitation remains Miotti's statement recorded in testimony. He also described briefing lawmakers in the US and Germany. This is advocacy access, not a government appointment. [M06]</p>\n<p>A September 2022 policy panel hosted by the Center for Data Innovation places him beside FLI's Anthony Aguirre, DeepMind's Alexandra Belias, Hugging Face's Irene Solaiman, and Kai Zenner, then head of office and digital policy adviser to MEP Axel Voss. It is a concrete earlier point of contact with the FLI and European policy worlds. It establishes coappearance, not an alliance or payment. [M01]</p>\n<h2>Bounded chronology</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Period</th>\n<th>Documented professional position or activity</th>\n<th>Evidence quality</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>2017</td>\n<td>Named among research assistants/interns helping UN ESCAP's Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report and country/subregional briefs</td>\n<td>Official report acknowledgement indexed by search; full PDF returned 403. Research support, not senior UN policy authority. M08</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>13 Sep 2022</td>\n<td>Conjecture Head of AI Policy and Governance; speaker on EU general-purpose AI regulation</td>\n<td>Organizer roster opened/read. M01</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Before founding ControlAI</td>\n<td>Head of Strategy and Governance at Conjecture</td>\n<td>His biography in UK parliamentary written evidence, Sep 2025. M02</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>22 Aug 2023 onward</td>\n<td>UK entity director and person with significant control</td>\n<td>Companies House. Shared formal control with Eva Behrens, not sole control. L01-L03</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>13 Oct 2023</td>\n<td>Coauthored MAGIC international AGI governance proposal with Jason Hausenloy and Claire Dennis, published by Conjecture</td>\n<td>Organization-hosted research opened/read. M07</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>13 Jun 2025</td>\n<td>ControlAI founder/executive director and Conjecture adviser; keynote speaker at Apart/ControlAI policy sprint</td>\n<td>Organizer page opened/read. M03</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sep 2025</td>\n<td>Coauthored evidence with Steven Adler to UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights</td>\n<td>Official written evidence opened/read. It invites an oral appearance; it does not prove one occurred. M02</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>26 Jan 2026</td>\n<td>ControlAI CEO, witness to Canadian Commons ETHI committee</td>\n<td>Official transcript opened/read. M06</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Current pages retrieved 5 Sep 2026</td>\n<td>ControlAI founder/CEO; authorized representative/CEO of Control AI US Inc in German lobby register</td>\n<td>Organization page and official register. M05, L04</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A secondary biography supplies a possible earlier transition through Brussels technology-policy consultancy BCW, as consultant/junior consultant approximately September 2021-June 2022, and LSE/Peking University public-policy study in 2019-2021. These details were not adequately corroborated in readable primary records. They remain leads, not established chronology. Search-indexed LinkedIn supported the LSE date range but did not expose a complete career history. No verified fellowship was found.</p>\n<h2>Governance and the financial boundary</h2>\n<p>The UK entity is Secure Future Research Ltd, company 15088415, trading as ControlAI. Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens have each been directors since incorporation on 22 August 2023; each has more than 25% but no more than 50% of voting rights plus a right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moes was a director and PSC until 7 November 2023. These records support shared legal control. They do not disclose which individual makes each operational decision. [L01-L03]</p>\n<p>Control AI US Inc is separately identified in Germany's lobby register, where Miotti is CEO/authorized representative. The US board and inter-entity agreements were not established by this pass. [L04]</p>\n<p>The already-read UK 2025 accounts disclose current assets of GBP7,587,477 and accruals/deferred income of GBP7,596,691, but omit the income/expenditure account and donor names. These figures are balance-sheet positions, not an annual budget. ControlAI's April 2026 USD50m yearly-budget proposal is a fundraising target. Neither source fills the upstream donor gap. No primary evidence in this workstream establishes a grant from Conjecture, the named Conjecture investors, Tallinn, FLI, CAIS, SFF or Open Philanthropy to ControlAI. See findings.md and the saved 2025 iXBRL for the prior financial review.</p>\n<h2>Policy collaboration, separately from authority</h2>\n<p>The 2023 MAGIC paper proposes an exclusive multinational institution permitted to develop advanced AI, alongside an internationally enforced moratorium on other advanced AI development. Miotti coauthored it with Jason Hausenloy and Claire Dennis; Conjecture published it. This demonstrates an authored preference for centralized international control of advanced development. MAGIC is a proposal, not an existing institution or authority Miotti possessed. The text explicitly leaves political feasibility and specific legislative strategies outside scope. [M07]</p>\n<p>Apart Research's June 2025 sprint is stronger evidence of institutional cooperation than a shared conference panel: it presented a ControlAI policy stress test, with ControlAI personnel including Adam Shimi, Max Winga and Tolga Bilge helping organize or judge, and Miotti giving the keynote. It links the policy-development and communications personnel operationally; it is not proof of a funding transfer between the organizations. [M03]</p>\n<h2>Source ledger</h2>\n<p>All sources retrieved 5 September 2026. Primary sources are first-person/organizational statements unless specifically marked independent official record.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>ID</th>\n<th>Exact URL</th>\n<th>Date or period</th>\n<th>Read status and use</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>M01</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://datainnovation.org/2022/09/should-the-eu-regulate-general-purpose-ai-systems/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://datainnovation.org/2022/09/should-the-eu-regulate-general-purpose-ai-systems/</a></td>\n<td>13 Sep 2022</td>\n<td>Opened/read organizer event roster: Conjecture role, FLI/DeepMind/Hugging Face/European Parliament panel contacts</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M02</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/</a></td>\n<td>Sep 2025; RAI0031</td>\n<td>Opened/read official 17-page written submission; Miotti career biography and joint authorship with Adler</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M03</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://apartresearch.com/sprints/red-teaming-a-narrow-path-control-ai-policy-sprint-2025-06-13-to-2025-06-13\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://apartresearch.com/sprints/red-teaming-a-narrow-path-control-ai-policy-sprint-2025-06-13-to-2025-06-13</a></td>\n<td>13 Jun 2025</td>\n<td>Opened/read organizer page; Conjecture adviser title and ControlAI/Apart cooperation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M04</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup</a></td>\n<td>8 Apr 2022</td>\n<td>Opened/read Conjecture announcement; exact founders, named VC backers, claim of founder control</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M05</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://controlai.org/about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/about</a></td>\n<td>Current page</td>\n<td>Opened/read ControlAI; Miotti, Leahy, Alfour, Browne roles and founder assistance</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M06</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2026/parl/xc73-1/XC73-1-2-451-24-eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2026/parl/xc73-1/XC73-1-2-451-24-eng.pdf</a></td>\n<td>26 Jan 2026; ETHI-24</td>\n<td>Opened/read 28-page official transcript; Miotti introduced at PDF p13, speaks p14-15, No.10 statement p22. Witness appearance independent; access claims remain testimony</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M07</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.conjecture.dev/research/multinational-agi-consortium-magic-a-proposal-for-international-coordination-on-ai\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.conjecture.dev/research/multinational-agi-consortium-magic-a-proposal-for-international-coordination-on-ai</a></td>\n<td>13 Oct 2023</td>\n<td>Opened/read author/organization research publication; proposal and coauthors</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>M08</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/knowledge-products/APTIR%202017%20full%202Mar18.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/knowledge-products/APTIR%202017%20full%202Mar18.pdf</a></td>\n<td>Report 2017; file dated March 2018</td>\n<td>Official search-indexed acknowledgement, p v, read; direct PDF retrieval failed 403. Not full-document verified</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>L01</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://controlai.org/privacy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/privacy</a> and <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415</a></td>\n<td>Entity incorporated 22 Aug 2023</td>\n<td>Opened/read earlier this session; trading name and entity identification</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>L02</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers</a></td>\n<td>2023-current</td>\n<td>Opened/read earlier this session; director appointments and cessation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>L03</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control</a></td>\n<td>2023-current</td>\n<td>Opened/read earlier this session; voting and director-appointment rights</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>L04</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795</a></td>\n<td>First 19 Jan 2026; last change 16 Mar 2026</td>\n<td>Opened/read earlier this session; Miotti authorized representative/CEO for Control AI US Inc</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S01</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://theorg.com/org/conjecture/org-chart/andrea-miotti\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://theorg.com/org/conjecture/org-chart/andrea-miotti</a></td>\n<td>Undated</td>\n<td>Search-indexed secondary biography read; direct open redirected to sparse company page. BCW and full education chronology remain unverified</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S02</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrea-miotti\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrea-miotti</a></td>\n<td>Undated public profile</td>\n<td>Search index only, not full open/read; partial LSE date corroboration</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Typed connections</h2>\n<p>Null means undisclosed or not a monetary connection, never zero. Source IDs resolve to exact URLs above. This table records the relationship actually observed, without collapsing it into a more powerful relationship.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Type</th>\n<th>Amount / currency</th>\n<th>Period</th>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Certainty / limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>employment: policy/governance leadership</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Confirmed Sep 2022; ended before founding ControlAI per later biography</td>\n<td>M01/M02</td>\n<td>Strong; exact title varies between sources</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>adviser</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Jun 2025 event biography</td>\n<td>M03</td>\n<td>Organizer-attested; tenure and compensation undisclosed</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nat Friedman; Daniel Gross; Patrick Collison; John Collison; Arthur Breitman; Andrej Karpathy; Sam Bankman-Fried</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>venture investment</td>\n<td>Undisclosed</td>\n<td>Announced Apr 2022</td>\n<td>M04</td>\n<td>Company disclosure; historical and non-exhaustive; no ControlAI financial edge</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Connor Leahy; Sid Black; Gabriel Alfour</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>founders</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Apr 2022 announcement</td>\n<td>M04</td>\n<td>Company says founders retained control; not current cap-table evidence</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>director, voting rights, director-appointment rights</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Since 22 Aug 2023</td>\n<td>L02/L03</td>\n<td>Shared formal control with Behrens</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Control AI US Inc</td>\n<td>CEO / authorized representative</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current register read Sep 2026</td>\n<td>L04</td>\n<td>Not a complete US governance map</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Connor Leahy</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>US Executive Director</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current page</td>\n<td>M05</td>\n<td>Conjecture founder-to-ControlAI leadership bridge</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Gabriel Alfour</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>adviser; helped establish organization</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Historical founding help/current adviser</td>\n<td>M05</td>\n<td>Concrete personnel/founding bridge; no transfer established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Des Browne</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>adviser</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Current page</td>\n<td>M05</td>\n<td>Professional link to former UK Defence Secretary and disarmament-network leader</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Steven Adler</td>\n<td>coauthored parliamentary evidence</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Sep 2025</td>\n<td>M02</td>\n<td>Adler's former OpenAI role is background, not OpenAI participation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Canadian Commons ETHI committee</td>\n<td>invited witness/testimony</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>26 Jan 2026</td>\n<td>M06</td>\n<td>Official transcript independently verifies appearance</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>UK Prime Minister's office</td>\n<td>reported invitation to present proposed bill</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Before Jan 2026 testimony; exact date absent</td>\n<td>M06</td>\n<td>Miotti's statement; no independent No.10 diary read; bill not passed at testimony</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Anthony Aguirre / FLI; Alexandra Belias / DeepMind; Irene Solaiman / Hugging Face; Kai Zenner / Axel Voss office</td>\n<td>panel coappearance</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>13 Sep 2022</td>\n<td>M01</td>\n<td>Shared forum only</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>Jason Hausenloy; Claire Dennis</td>\n<td>policy research coauthorship</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Oct 2023</td>\n<td>M07</td>\n<td>MAGIC proposal; does not establish a governing institution</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Apart Research</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>collaborative policy event</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>Jun 2025</td>\n<td>M03</td>\n<td>Operational event cooperation; money unknown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Andrea Miotti</td>\n<td>UN ESCAP</td>\n<td>credited report research assistance</td>\n<td>null</td>\n<td>2017</td>\n<td>M08</td>\n<td>Indexed official acknowledgement; PDF retrieval boundary</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Material gaps and explanatory limits</h2>\n<p>The professional path before Conjecture is only partly supported by accessible primary sources. BCW and full education dates need direct employer/university/profile evidence; no inference about any government or political party follows from study or research assistance. The exact dates and terms of Conjecture employment/advisory work, share ownership, compensation and any continuing decision authority are unknown.</p>\n<p>The capital bridge stops at the former employer. The sources do not identify ControlAI's major donors, earmark conditions, intercompany transfers, or whether any Conjecture investor supported ControlAI. Miotti's legal control and adviser network are concrete without resolving those money questions. The observed connections are compatible with a small, mission-aligned policy community exchanging staff, expertise and access; they do not by themselves demonstrate a hidden common command.</p>\n<h3>Later status correction from the parallel root investigation</h3>\n<p>Root independently read Connor Leahy's first-person retrospective dated 26 March 2026: <a href=\"https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective</a> . Leahy describes the Conjecture chapter as ended, says its technical/product effort failed, and announces his move to ControlAI US in Washington. This follow-up therefore treats Conjecture employment and investment as historical; the June 2025 adviser title does not establish a continuing September 2026 role. Root also records Leahy's account of growing disagreement with effective altruism. Shared earlier networks should not be presented as a uniformly coordinated current bloc. Read status: source read in the parallel root investigation, not independently opened in this subagent's final bounded pass.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections \n Research cut-off: 5 September 2026. Public sources only; no outreach or private access. This follow-up maps employment, formal authority, investment in a former employer, policy collaboration and political access. It does not infer common command from association. Earlier ControlAI evidence is preserved in findings.md in this directory. \n Most consequential findings \n Miotti's strongest institutional bridge is Conjecture. An organizer's September 2022 event page identifies him as its Head of AI Policy and Governance; his September 2025 UK parliamentary submission calls his earlier job Head of Strategy and Governance. A June 2025 Apart Research event still describes him as an adviser to Conjecture, alongside his ControlAI leadership. Thus this was both employment and a later advisory connection. Conjecture's own founding announcement names Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour as founders; it does not name Miotti as a cofounder. [M01, M02, M03, M04] \n Conjecture disclosed venture backing in April 2022 from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy and Sam Bankman-Fried, among others. It also said its founders retained complete company control. This is a documented investor network around Miotti's former employer. No investor amount, current ownership, investment in Miotti personally, or donation to ControlAI follows from it. [M04] \n The bridge persists through people with current ControlAI roles: its about page identifies Conjecture cofounder Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, and Conjecture cofounder Gabriel Alfour as an adviser who helped Andrea establish ControlAI. The same page lists former UK Defence Secretary Des Browne as adviser, identifying his Nuclear Threat Initiative and European Leadership Network leadership. These are specific organizational access channels; their outside institutions are not thereby ControlAI funders or endorsers. [M05] \n There is direct political access in the official record. Miotti testified remotely to Canada's Commons ethics committee on 26 January 2026 alongside Steven Adler, who appeared as an individual. Miotti said ControlAI had been invited to present a bill banning superintelligence to the UK Prime Minister's office, and that the bill had not passed. The committee appearance is independently documented; the No.10 invitation remains Miotti's statement recorded in testimony. He also described briefing lawmakers in the US and Germany. This is advocacy access, not a government appointment. [M06] \n A September 2022 policy panel hosted by the Center for Data Innovation places him beside FLI's Anthony Aguirre, DeepMind's Alexandra Belias, Hugging Face's Irene Solaiman, and Kai Zenner, then head of office and digital policy adviser to MEP Axel Voss. It is a concrete earlier point of contact with the FLI and European policy worlds. It establishes coappearance, not an alliance or payment. [M01] \n Bounded chronology \n \n \n \n Period \n Documented professional position or activity \n Evidence quality \n \n \n \n \n 2017 \n Named among research assistants/interns helping UN ESCAP's Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report and country/subregional briefs \n Official report acknowledgement indexed by search; full PDF returned 403. Research support, not senior UN policy authority. M08 \n \n \n 13 Sep 2022 \n Conjecture Head of AI Policy and Governance; speaker on EU general-purpose AI regulation \n Organizer roster opened/read. M01 \n \n \n Before founding ControlAI \n Head of Strategy and Governance at Conjecture \n His biography in UK parliamentary written evidence, Sep 2025. M02 \n \n \n 22 Aug 2023 onward \n UK entity director and person with significant control \n Companies House. Shared formal control with Eva Behrens, not sole control. L01-L03 \n \n \n 13 Oct 2023 \n Coauthored MAGIC international AGI governance proposal with Jason Hausenloy and Claire Dennis, published by Conjecture \n Organization-hosted research opened/read. M07 \n \n \n 13 Jun 2025 \n ControlAI founder/executive director and Conjecture adviser; keynote speaker at Apart/ControlAI policy sprint \n Organizer page opened/read. M03 \n \n \n Sep 2025 \n Coauthored evidence with Steven Adler to UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights \n Official written evidence opened/read. It invites an oral appearance; it does not prove one occurred. M02 \n \n \n 26 Jan 2026 \n ControlAI CEO, witness to Canadian Commons ETHI committee \n Official transcript opened/read. M06 \n \n \n Current pages retrieved 5 Sep 2026 \n ControlAI founder/CEO; authorized representative/CEO of Control AI US Inc in German lobby register \n Organization page and official register. M05, L04 \n \n \n \n A secondary biography supplies a possible earlier transition through Brussels technology-policy consultancy BCW, as consultant/junior consultant approximately September 2021-June 2022, and LSE/Peking University public-policy study in 2019-2021. These details were not adequately corroborated in readable primary records. They remain leads, not established chronology. Search-indexed LinkedIn supported the LSE date range but did not expose a complete career history. No verified fellowship was found. \n Governance and the financial boundary \n The UK entity is Secure Future Research Ltd, company 15088415, trading as ControlAI. Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens have each been directors since incorporation on 22 August 2023; each has more than 25% but no more than 50% of voting rights plus a right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moes was a director and PSC until 7 November 2023. These records support shared legal control. They do not disclose which individual makes each operational decision. [L01-L03] \n Control AI US Inc is separately identified in Germany's lobby register, where Miotti is CEO/authorized representative. The US board and inter-entity agreements were not established by this pass. [L04] \n The already-read UK 2025 accounts disclose current assets of GBP7,587,477 and accruals/deferred income of GBP7,596,691, but omit the income/expenditure account and donor names. These figures are balance-sheet positions, not an annual budget. ControlAI's April 2026 USD50m yearly-budget proposal is a fundraising target. Neither source fills the upstream donor gap. No primary evidence in this workstream establishes a grant from Conjecture, the named Conjecture investors, Tallinn, FLI, CAIS, SFF or Open Philanthropy to ControlAI. See findings.md and the saved 2025 iXBRL for the prior financial review. \n Policy collaboration, separately from authority \n The 2023 MAGIC paper proposes an exclusive multinational institution permitted to develop advanced AI, alongside an internationally enforced moratorium on other advanced AI development. Miotti coauthored it with Jason Hausenloy and Claire Dennis; Conjecture published it. This demonstrates an authored preference for centralized international control of advanced development. MAGIC is a proposal, not an existing institution or authority Miotti possessed. The text explicitly leaves political feasibility and specific legislative strategies outside scope. [M07] \n Apart Research's June 2025 sprint is stronger evidence of institutional cooperation than a shared conference panel: it presented a ControlAI policy stress test, with ControlAI personnel including Adam Shimi, Max Winga and Tolga Bilge helping organize or judge, and Miotti giving the keynote. It links the policy-development and communications personnel operationally; it is not proof of a funding transfer between the organizations. [M03] \n Source ledger \n All sources retrieved 5 September 2026. Primary sources are first-person/organizational statements unless specifically marked independent official record. \n \n \n \n ID \n Exact URL \n Date or period \n Read status and use \n \n \n \n \n M01 \n  https://datainnovation.org/2022/09/should-the-eu-regulate-general-purpose-ai-systems/  \n 13 Sep 2022 \n Opened/read organizer event roster: Conjecture role, FLI/DeepMind/Hugging Face/European Parliament panel contacts \n \n \n M02 \n  https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/  \n Sep 2025; RAI0031 \n Opened/read official 17-page written submission; Miotti career biography and joint authorship with Adler \n \n \n M03 \n  https://apartresearch.com/sprints/red-teaming-a-narrow-path-control-ai-policy-sprint-2025-06-13-to-2025-06-13  \n 13 Jun 2025 \n Opened/read organizer page; Conjecture adviser title and ControlAI/Apart cooperation \n \n \n M04 \n  https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup  \n 8 Apr 2022 \n Opened/read Conjecture announcement; exact founders, named VC backers, claim of founder control \n \n \n M05 \n  https://controlai.org/about  \n Current page \n Opened/read ControlAI; Miotti, Leahy, Alfour, Browne roles and founder assistance \n \n \n M06 \n  https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2026/parl/xc73-1/XC73-1-2-451-24-eng.pdf  \n 26 Jan 2026; ETHI-24 \n Opened/read 28-page official transcript; Miotti introduced at PDF p13, speaks p14-15, No.10 statement p22. Witness appearance independent; access claims remain testimony \n \n \n M07 \n  https://www.conjecture.dev/research/multinational-agi-consortium-magic-a-proposal-for-international-coordination-on-ai  \n 13 Oct 2023 \n Opened/read author/organization research publication; proposal and coauthors \n \n \n M08 \n  https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/knowledge-products/APTIR%202017%20full%202Mar18.pdf  \n Report 2017; file dated March 2018 \n Official search-indexed acknowledgement, p v, read; direct PDF retrieval failed 403. Not full-document verified \n \n \n L01 \n  https://controlai.org/privacy  and  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415  \n Entity incorporated 22 Aug 2023 \n Opened/read earlier this session; trading name and entity identification \n \n \n L02 \n  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers  \n 2023-current \n Opened/read earlier this session; director appointments and cessation \n \n \n L03 \n  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control  \n 2023-current \n Opened/read earlier this session; voting and director-appointment rights \n \n \n L04 \n  https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795  \n First 19 Jan 2026; last change 16 Mar 2026 \n Opened/read earlier this session; Miotti authorized representative/CEO for Control AI US Inc \n \n \n S01 \n  https://theorg.com/org/conjecture/org-chart/andrea-miotti  \n Undated \n Search-indexed secondary biography read; direct open redirected to sparse company page. BCW and full education chronology remain unverified \n \n \n S02 \n  https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrea-miotti  \n Undated public profile \n Search index only, not full open/read; partial LSE date corroboration \n \n \n \n Typed connections \n Null means undisclosed or not a monetary connection, never zero. Source IDs resolve to exact URLs above. This table records the relationship actually observed, without collapsing it into a more powerful relationship. \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Type \n Amount / currency \n Period \n Source \n Certainty / limit \n \n \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Conjecture \n employment: policy/governance leadership \n null \n Confirmed Sep 2022; ended before founding ControlAI per later biography \n M01/M02 \n Strong; exact title varies between sources \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Conjecture \n adviser \n null \n Jun 2025 event biography \n M03 \n Organizer-attested; tenure and compensation undisclosed \n \n \n Nat Friedman; Daniel Gross; Patrick Collison; John Collison; Arthur Breitman; Andrej Karpathy; Sam Bankman-Fried \n Conjecture \n venture investment \n Undisclosed \n Announced Apr 2022 \n M04 \n Company disclosure; historical and non-exhaustive; no ControlAI financial edge \n \n \n Connor Leahy; Sid Black; Gabriel Alfour \n Conjecture \n founders \n null \n Apr 2022 announcement \n M04 \n Company says founders retained control; not current cap-table evidence \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n director, voting rights, director-appointment rights \n null \n Since 22 Aug 2023 \n L02/L03 \n Shared formal control with Behrens \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Control AI US Inc \n CEO / authorized representative \n null \n Current register read Sep 2026 \n L04 \n Not a complete US governance map \n \n \n Connor Leahy \n ControlAI \n US Executive Director \n null \n Current page \n M05 \n Conjecture founder-to-ControlAI leadership bridge \n \n \n Gabriel Alfour \n ControlAI \n adviser; helped establish organization \n null \n Historical founding help/current adviser \n M05 \n Concrete personnel/founding bridge; no transfer established \n \n \n Des Browne \n ControlAI \n adviser \n null \n Current page \n M05 \n Professional link to former UK Defence Secretary and disarmament-network leader \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Steven Adler \n coauthored parliamentary evidence \n null \n Sep 2025 \n M02 \n Adler's former OpenAI role is background, not OpenAI participation \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Canadian Commons ETHI committee \n invited witness/testimony \n null \n 26 Jan 2026 \n M06 \n Official transcript independently verifies appearance \n \n \n ControlAI \n UK Prime Minister's office \n reported invitation to present proposed bill \n null \n Before Jan 2026 testimony; exact date absent \n M06 \n Miotti's statement; no independent No.10 diary read; bill not passed at testimony \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Anthony Aguirre / FLI; Alexandra Belias / DeepMind; Irene Solaiman / Hugging Face; Kai Zenner / Axel Voss office \n panel coappearance \n null \n 13 Sep 2022 \n M01 \n Shared forum only \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n Jason Hausenloy; Claire Dennis \n policy research coauthorship \n null \n Oct 2023 \n M07 \n MAGIC proposal; does not establish a governing institution \n \n \n Apart Research \n ControlAI \n collaborative policy event \n null \n Jun 2025 \n M03 \n Operational event cooperation; money unknown \n \n \n Andrea Miotti \n UN ESCAP \n credited report research assistance \n null \n 2017 \n M08 \n Indexed official acknowledgement; PDF retrieval boundary \n \n \n \n Material gaps and explanatory limits \n The professional path before Conjecture is only partly supported by accessible primary sources. BCW and full education dates need direct employer/university/profile evidence; no inference about any government or political party follows from study or research assistance. The exact dates and terms of Conjecture employment/advisory work, share ownership, compensation and any continuing decision authority are unknown. \n The capital bridge stops at the former employer. The sources do not identify ControlAI's major donors, earmark conditions, intercompany transfers, or whether any Conjecture investor supported ControlAI. Miotti's legal control and adviser network are concrete without resolving those money questions. The observed connections are compatible with a small, mission-aligned policy community exchanging staff, expertise and access; they do not by themselves demonstrate a hidden common command. \n Later status correction from the parallel root investigation \n Root independently read Connor Leahy's first-person retrospective dated 26 March 2026:  https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective  . Leahy describes the Conjecture chapter as ended, says its technical/product effort failed, and announces his move to ControlAI US in Washington. This follow-up therefore treats Conjecture employment and investment as historical; the June 2025 adviser title does not establish a continuing September 2026 role. Root also records Leahy's account of growing disagreement with effective altruism. Shared earlier networks should not be presented as a uniformly coordinated current bloc. Read status: source read in the parallel root investigation, not independently opened in this subagent's final bounded pass. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/controlai/miotti-connections.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Andrea Miotti: documented institutional connections\n\nResearch cut-off: 5 September 2026. Public sources only; no outreach or private access. This follow-up maps employment, formal authority, investment in a former employer, policy collaboration and political access. It does not infer common command from association. Earlier ControlAI evidence is preserved in findings.md in this directory.\n\n## Most consequential findings\n\nMiotti's strongest institutional bridge is Conjecture. An organizer's September 2022 event page identifies him as its Head of AI Policy and Governance; his September 2025 UK parliamentary submission calls his earlier job Head of Strategy and Governance. A June 2025 Apart Research event still describes him as an adviser to Conjecture, alongside his ControlAI leadership. Thus this was both employment and a later advisory connection. Conjecture's own founding announcement names Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour as founders; it does not name Miotti as a cofounder. [M01, M02, M03, M04]\n\nConjecture disclosed venture backing in April 2022 from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy and Sam Bankman-Fried, among others. It also said its founders retained complete company control. This is a documented investor network around Miotti's former employer. No investor amount, current ownership, investment in Miotti personally, or donation to ControlAI follows from it. [M04]\n\nThe bridge persists through people with current ControlAI roles: its about page identifies Conjecture cofounder Connor Leahy as US Executive Director, and Conjecture cofounder Gabriel Alfour as an adviser who helped Andrea establish ControlAI. The same page lists former UK Defence Secretary Des Browne as adviser, identifying his Nuclear Threat Initiative and European Leadership Network leadership. These are specific organizational access channels; their outside institutions are not thereby ControlAI funders or endorsers. [M05]\n\nThere is direct political access in the official record. Miotti testified remotely to Canada's Commons ethics committee on 26 January 2026 alongside Steven Adler, who appeared as an individual. Miotti said ControlAI had been invited to present a bill banning superintelligence to the UK Prime Minister's office, and that the bill had not passed. The committee appearance is independently documented; the No.10 invitation remains Miotti's statement recorded in testimony. He also described briefing lawmakers in the US and Germany. This is advocacy access, not a government appointment. [M06]\n\nA September 2022 policy panel hosted by the Center for Data Innovation places him beside FLI's Anthony Aguirre, DeepMind's Alexandra Belias, Hugging Face's Irene Solaiman, and Kai Zenner, then head of office and digital policy adviser to MEP Axel Voss. It is a concrete earlier point of contact with the FLI and European policy worlds. It establishes coappearance, not an alliance or payment. [M01]\n\n## Bounded chronology\n\n| Period | Documented professional position or activity | Evidence quality |\n|---|---|---|\n| 2017 | Named among research assistants/interns helping UN ESCAP's Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report and country/subregional briefs | Official report acknowledgement indexed by search; full PDF returned 403. Research support, not senior UN policy authority. M08 |\n| 13 Sep 2022 | Conjecture Head of AI Policy and Governance; speaker on EU general-purpose AI regulation | Organizer roster opened/read. M01 |\n| Before founding ControlAI | Head of Strategy and Governance at Conjecture | His biography in UK parliamentary written evidence, Sep 2025. M02 |\n| 22 Aug 2023 onward | UK entity director and person with significant control | Companies House. Shared formal control with Eva Behrens, not sole control. L01-L03 |\n| 13 Oct 2023 | Coauthored MAGIC international AGI governance proposal with Jason Hausenloy and Claire Dennis, published by Conjecture | Organization-hosted research opened/read. M07 |\n| 13 Jun 2025 | ControlAI founder/executive director and Conjecture adviser; keynote speaker at Apart/ControlAI policy sprint | Organizer page opened/read. M03 |\n| Sep 2025 | Coauthored evidence with Steven Adler to UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights | Official written evidence opened/read. It invites an oral appearance; it does not prove one occurred. M02 |\n| 26 Jan 2026 | ControlAI CEO, witness to Canadian Commons ETHI committee | Official transcript opened/read. M06 |\n| Current pages retrieved 5 Sep 2026 | ControlAI founder/CEO; authorized representative/CEO of Control AI US Inc in German lobby register | Organization page and official register. M05, L04 |\n\nA secondary biography supplies a possible earlier transition through Brussels technology-policy consultancy BCW, as consultant/junior consultant approximately September 2021-June 2022, and LSE/Peking University public-policy study in 2019-2021. These details were not adequately corroborated in readable primary records. They remain leads, not established chronology. Search-indexed LinkedIn supported the LSE date range but did not expose a complete career history. No verified fellowship was found.\n\n## Governance and the financial boundary\n\nThe UK entity is Secure Future Research Ltd, company 15088415, trading as ControlAI. Miotti and Eva Christa Annelore Behrens have each been directors since incorporation on 22 August 2023; each has more than 25% but no more than 50% of voting rights plus a right to appoint/remove directors. Nicolas Michel Pierre Moes was a director and PSC until 7 November 2023. These records support shared legal control. They do not disclose which individual makes each operational decision. [L01-L03]\n\nControl AI US Inc is separately identified in Germany's lobby register, where Miotti is CEO/authorized representative. The US board and inter-entity agreements were not established by this pass. [L04]\n\nThe already-read UK 2025 accounts disclose current assets of GBP7,587,477 and accruals/deferred income of GBP7,596,691, but omit the income/expenditure account and donor names. These figures are balance-sheet positions, not an annual budget. ControlAI's April 2026 USD50m yearly-budget proposal is a fundraising target. Neither source fills the upstream donor gap. No primary evidence in this workstream establishes a grant from Conjecture, the named Conjecture investors, Tallinn, FLI, CAIS, SFF or Open Philanthropy to ControlAI. See findings.md and the saved 2025 iXBRL for the prior financial review.\n\n## Policy collaboration, separately from authority\n\nThe 2023 MAGIC paper proposes an exclusive multinational institution permitted to develop advanced AI, alongside an internationally enforced moratorium on other advanced AI development. Miotti coauthored it with Jason Hausenloy and Claire Dennis; Conjecture published it. This demonstrates an authored preference for centralized international control of advanced development. MAGIC is a proposal, not an existing institution or authority Miotti possessed. The text explicitly leaves political feasibility and specific legislative strategies outside scope. [M07]\n\nApart Research's June 2025 sprint is stronger evidence of institutional cooperation than a shared conference panel: it presented a ControlAI policy stress test, with ControlAI personnel including Adam Shimi, Max Winga and Tolga Bilge helping organize or judge, and Miotti giving the keynote. It links the policy-development and communications personnel operationally; it is not proof of a funding transfer between the organizations. [M03]\n\n## Source ledger\n\nAll sources retrieved 5 September 2026. Primary sources are first-person/organizational statements unless specifically marked independent official record.\n\n| ID | Exact URL | Date or period | Read status and use |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| M01 | https://datainnovation.org/2022/09/should-the-eu-regulate-general-purpose-ai-systems/ | 13 Sep 2022 | Opened/read organizer event roster: Conjecture role, FLI/DeepMind/Hugging Face/European Parliament panel contacts |\n| M02 | https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/148236/pdf/ | Sep 2025; RAI0031 | Opened/read official 17-page written submission; Miotti career biography and joint authorship with Adler |\n| M03 | https://apartresearch.com/sprints/red-teaming-a-narrow-path-control-ai-policy-sprint-2025-06-13-to-2025-06-13 | 13 Jun 2025 | Opened/read organizer page; Conjecture adviser title and ControlAI/Apart cooperation |\n| M04 | https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup | 8 Apr 2022 | Opened/read Conjecture announcement; exact founders, named VC backers, claim of founder control |\n| M05 | https://controlai.org/about | Current page | Opened/read ControlAI; Miotti, Leahy, Alfour, Browne roles and founder assistance |\n| M06 | https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2026/parl/xc73-1/XC73-1-2-451-24-eng.pdf | 26 Jan 2026; ETHI-24 | Opened/read 28-page official transcript; Miotti introduced at PDF p13, speaks p14-15, No.10 statement p22. Witness appearance independent; access claims remain testimony |\n| M07 | https://www.conjecture.dev/research/multinational-agi-consortium-magic-a-proposal-for-international-coordination-on-ai | 13 Oct 2023 | Opened/read author/organization research publication; proposal and coauthors |\n| M08 | https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/knowledge-products/APTIR%202017%20full%202Mar18.pdf | Report 2017; file dated March 2018 | Official search-indexed acknowledgement, p v, read; direct PDF retrieval failed 403. Not full-document verified |\n| L01 | https://controlai.org/privacy and https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415 | Entity incorporated 22 Aug 2023 | Opened/read earlier this session; trading name and entity identification |\n| L02 | https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers | 2023-current | Opened/read earlier this session; director appointments and cessation |\n| L03 | https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control | 2023-current | Opened/read earlier this session; voting and director-appointment rights |\n| L04 | https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007795 | First 19 Jan 2026; last change 16 Mar 2026 | Opened/read earlier this session; Miotti authorized representative/CEO for Control AI US Inc |\n| S01 | https://theorg.com/org/conjecture/org-chart/andrea-miotti | Undated | Search-indexed secondary biography read; direct open redirected to sparse company page. BCW and full education chronology remain unverified |\n| S02 | https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrea-miotti | Undated public profile | Search index only, not full open/read; partial LSE date corroboration |\n\n## Typed connections\n\nNull means undisclosed or not a monetary connection, never zero. Source IDs resolve to exact URLs above. This table records the relationship actually observed, without collapsing it into a more powerful relationship.\n\n| From | To | Type | Amount / currency | Period | Source | Certainty / limit |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Andrea Miotti | Conjecture | employment: policy/governance leadership | null | Confirmed Sep 2022; ended before founding ControlAI per later biography | M01/M02 | Strong; exact title varies between sources |\n| Andrea Miotti | Conjecture | adviser | null | Jun 2025 event biography | M03 | Organizer-attested; tenure and compensation undisclosed |\n| Nat Friedman; Daniel Gross; Patrick Collison; John Collison; Arthur Breitman; Andrej Karpathy; Sam Bankman-Fried | Conjecture | venture investment | Undisclosed | Announced Apr 2022 | M04 | Company disclosure; historical and non-exhaustive; no ControlAI financial edge |\n| Connor Leahy; Sid Black; Gabriel Alfour | Conjecture | founders | null | Apr 2022 announcement | M04 | Company says founders retained control; not current cap-table evidence |\n| Andrea Miotti | Secure Future Research Ltd | director, voting rights, director-appointment rights | null | Since 22 Aug 2023 | L02/L03 | Shared formal control with Behrens |\n| Andrea Miotti | Control AI US Inc | CEO / authorized representative | null | Current register read Sep 2026 | L04 | Not a complete US governance map |\n| Connor Leahy | ControlAI | US Executive Director | null | Current page | M05 | Conjecture founder-to-ControlAI leadership bridge |\n| Gabriel Alfour | ControlAI | adviser; helped establish organization | null | Historical founding help/current adviser | M05 | Concrete personnel/founding bridge; no transfer established |\n| Des Browne | ControlAI | adviser | null | Current page | M05 | Professional link to former UK Defence Secretary and disarmament-network leader |\n| Andrea Miotti | Steven Adler | coauthored parliamentary evidence | null | Sep 2025 | M02 | Adler's former OpenAI role is background, not OpenAI participation |\n| Andrea Miotti | Canadian Commons ETHI committee | invited witness/testimony | null | 26 Jan 2026 | M06 | Official transcript independently verifies appearance |\n| ControlAI | UK Prime Minister's office | reported invitation to present proposed bill | null | Before Jan 2026 testimony; exact date absent | M06 | Miotti's statement; no independent No.10 diary read; bill not passed at testimony |\n| Andrea Miotti | Anthony Aguirre / FLI; Alexandra Belias / DeepMind; Irene Solaiman / Hugging Face; Kai Zenner / Axel Voss office | panel coappearance | null | 13 Sep 2022 | M01 | Shared forum only |\n| Andrea Miotti | Jason Hausenloy; Claire Dennis | policy research coauthorship | null | Oct 2023 | M07 | MAGIC proposal; does not establish a governing institution |\n| Apart Research | ControlAI | collaborative policy event | null | Jun 2025 | M03 | Operational event cooperation; money unknown |\n| Andrea Miotti | UN ESCAP | credited report research assistance | null | 2017 | M08 | Indexed official acknowledgement; PDF retrieval boundary |\n\n## Material gaps and explanatory limits\n\nThe professional path before Conjecture is only partly supported by accessible primary sources. BCW and full education dates need direct employer/university/profile evidence; no inference about any government or political party follows from study or research assistance. The exact dates and terms of Conjecture employment/advisory work, share ownership, compensation and any continuing decision authority are unknown.\n\nThe capital bridge stops at the former employer. The sources do not identify ControlAI's major donors, earmark conditions, intercompany transfers, or whether any Conjecture investor supported ControlAI. Miotti's legal control and adviser network are concrete without resolving those money questions. The observed connections are compatible with a small, mission-aligned policy community exchanging staff, expertise and access; they do not by themselves demonstrate a hidden common command.\n\n### Later status correction from the parallel root investigation\n\nRoot independently read Connor Leahy's first-person retrospective dated 26 March 2026: https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective . Leahy describes the Conjecture chapter as ended, says its technical/product effort failed, and announces his move to ControlAI US in Washington. This follow-up therefore treats Conjecture employment and investment as historical; the June 2025 adviser title does not establish a continuing September 2026 role. Root also records Leahy's account of growing disagreement with effective altruism. Shared earlier networks should not be presented as a uniformly coordinated current bloc. Read status: source read in the parallel root investigation, not independently opened in this subagent's final bounded pass.\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-controlai-behrens-connections",
        "title": "Eva Behrens: public institutional connections",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Eva Behrens: public institutional connections</h1>\n<p>Observed 2026-09-05. Bounded public-source inquiry. No outreach, private access, paid access, or personal-life research. Roles, legal control, coauthorship, network membership, and funding are distinct edges. Parent research covers political access and Conjecture investors.</p>\n<h2>Findings</h2>\n<p>Behrens has material formal authority at Secure Future Research Ltd (company 15088415, the UK ControlAI entity identified in the parent investigation), in addition to the public-facing Special Projects Lead title. Companies House lists her as an active director appointed 22 August 2023 and an active person with significant control: more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, plus rights to appoint/remove directors. Andrea Miotti is the other active director/PSC. Nicolas Moes resigned/ceased control on 7 November 2023. These are registered declarations, not proof of each person's day-to-day decisions. Do not call the voting percentage an equity share in a company limited by guarantee.</p>\n<p>Her corroborated trajectory runs from European industrial/economic and innovation-policy work into AI policy research, then Conjecture operations and ControlAI. An October 2022 employer biography identifies her as a Center for Data Innovation policy fellow, with prior OECD fiscal foresight and Federation of German Industries industrial/Sino-European policy experience, and an MPA from UCL. May and November 2024 publications independently document her CFG and Oxford Martin collaborative work. Her own site dates the end of her CFG work to January 2025. Conjecture's May 2025 privacy notice names her as organizational contact. The current ControlAI team lists Special Projects Lead.</p>\n<p>RECENCY: Her own website still labels Conjecture operations as current, but parent verified Connor Leahy's March 26, 2026 retrospective describing Conjecture's chapter ending. Treat Conjecture operations as a documented historical 2025 link, not confirmed simultaneous current employment. Link supplied by parent: <a href=\"https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective</a> (not independently opened by this agent).</p>\n<p>The most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI.</p>\n<p>CFG's disclosed seed backing from Dreamery and Tanka, plus subsequent general/program funding, describes her former employer's support. It is not a demonstrated funding path to ControlAI. Oxford/IAI publications show access to established policy research channels, not employment or official government authority at those publishers.</p>\n<h2>Source register and precise locations</h2>\n<p>S1. Companies House, Secure Future Research Ltd officers. <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Active director entry and appointment date; other active director Miotti, former director Moes. Web text lines 30-91. Register warns it does not check accuracy of filed information. Personal address, birth details and nationality are unnecessary and omitted.</p>\n<p>S2. Companies House, persons with significant control. <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Behrens notified 2023-08-22; Nature of control fields lines 50-52. Miotti same categories, Moes ceased 2023-11-07. No exact percentage beyond the disclosed band, and no evidence about private voting arrangements.</p>\n<p>S3. ControlAI About Us. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/about</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Team lines 133-135: Eva Behrens, Special Projects Lead. Organization identifies UK company limited by guarantee; organization-wide legislative briefing claims do not establish that Behrens personally attended each meeting. No detailed job specification or internal delegated authority given.</p>\n<p>S4. Eva Behrens own professional site. <a href=\"https://www.evabehrens.com/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.evabehrens.com/</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05; undated. Lines 17-25 describe Conjecture operations, CFG until January 2025, CDI/ITIF, Pour Demain advice on EU AI priorities, OECD OPSI anticipatory-innovation work, BDI, Andritz procurement work, EF inaugural Polaris fellowship, Talos and UCL. Lines 28-39 list research outputs and conference presentation. These are self-reports; present-tense Conjecture role may be stale. Pour Demain, Andritz and Polaris specifics lack independent corroboration in this bounded inquiry. Her site says she contributed to A Narrow Path; no precise task/scope established here.</p>\n<p>S5. Center for Data Innovation, Social Media Should Not Be Blamed for Lower Trust in Public Institutions, 2022-10-11. <a href=\"https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/</a> . Opened/read. Author biography at line 28 confirms policy fellow focused on European AI, prior OECD and BDI work, and UCL MPA. Article argues against inferring that social-media use causes institutional distrust and warns against censorship. This is a historical stated position, not evidence about every later policy proposal.</p>\n<p>S6. CDI institutional About page. <a href=\"https://datainnovation.org/about/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://datainnovation.org/about/</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05, undated current text. Lines 7-9 identify CDI as part of ITIF and host of AI Policy Network; supporters described as corporations, charitable foundations and individuals. No claim that Behrens belonged to every CDI network or personally received corporate money. ITIF supporter page was opened, but named funders and Behrens-era allocations were not extracted; no further inference.</p>\n<p>S7. Istituto Affari Internazionali, Enhancing Global AI Governance through Compute Resource Management, 2024-05-24. <a href=\"https://www.iai.it/it/pubblicazioni/enhancing-global-ai-governance-through-compute-resource-management\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.iai.it/it/pubblicazioni/enhancing-global-ai-governance-through-compute-resource-management</a> . Opened/read. Authors Behrens, David Janku, Bengusu Ozcan, Max Reddel (lines 59-69); author affiliation at 104 explicitly identifies Behrens/Janku as ICFG Advanced AI Researchers. Proposes a G7-backed, internationally co-governed compute standards institution, compute registry and impact assessment. Publication proves coauthorship and policy advocacy, not that the proposed consortium exists or that G7 governments endorsed it.</p>\n<p>S8. Oxford Martin School, What Should Be Internationalised in AI Governance?, 2024-11-13. <a href=\"https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/what-should-be-internationalised-in-ai-governance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/what-should-be-internationalised-in-ai-governance</a> . Opened/read. Author list line 21 includes Behrens alongside Claire Dennis, Stephen Clare, Rebecca Hawkins, Morgan Simpson, Gillian Diebold, Zaheed Kara, Ruofei Wang, Robert Trager, Matthijs Maas, Noam Kolt, Markus Anderljung, Konstantin Pilz, Anka Reuel, Malcolm Murray, Lennart Heim and Marta Ziosi. This establishes joint authorship, not an Oxford employment/degree or each coauthor's endorsement of ControlAI. The abstract supports selective international coordination, with lower/mixed benefits for some policy areas.</p>\n<p>S9. CFG, Establishing AI Risk Thresholds: A Comparative Analysis Across High-Risk Sectors. <a href=\"https://cfg.eu/wp-content/uploads/CFG-Establishing-ai-risk-thresholds-report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://cfg.eu/wp-content/uploads/CFG-Establishing-ai-risk-thresholds-report.pdf</a> . Opened/read selected relevant sections, 33 pages. Page 1 lists Behrens/Ozcan; page 33 identifies Behrens as Advanced AI researcher for international policy/governance. Analysis includes information as of late October 2024; exact publication date not established from PDF. It argues for externally set risk thresholds and independent oversight, comparing AI with other safety-critical industries. Self-site says presented at UK AISI conference in 2024; parent handles official event corroboration.</p>\n<p>S10. Conjecture Privacy Policy. <a href=\"https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Updated May 14, 2025 (lines 42-44), names Eva Behrens under organization contact details (49-51). Further identifies Conjecture Inc. and Ltd. as covered entities (102-114). Corroborates a formal organizational operational contact at that period, not ownership or current continuing employment.</p>\n<p>S11. Talos Network alumni directory. <a href=\"https://www.talosnetwork.org/alumni-network\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.talosnetwork.org/alumni-network</a> . Opened 2026-09-05 but dynamic roster did not render in extracted text. Publisher SEARCH-INDEXED result explicitly lists Eva Behrens, Talos Fellow 2022, current ControlAI Special Projects Lead; also lists Anna Bruvere as a 2022 fellow. Thus cohort/date is indexed-only; self-site directly confirms membership. Directory co-membership is not proof of personal collaboration with every other fellow.</p>\n<p>S12. Talos Network Donate. <a href=\"https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Funding Sources paragraph, line 74, acknowledges Coefficient Giving, FLI, Survival and Flourishing Fund, independent donors, and disclaims donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. No dates/amounts, no individual awards. Donations described as supporting training and placements in government/think tanks/civil society; this is a stated institutional talent-development strategy.</p>\n<p>S13. CFG Funding. <a href=\"https://cfg.eu/funding/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://cfg.eu/funding/</a> . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Lines 9-20: seed Dreamery (associated with CFG cofounder Steven Schuurman) and Tanka cover first five years' baseline; general support Powoki. Current program support lists ARIA, ACX/Manifund, AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund (Transatlantic), DAFgiving360 via LAD Climate Fund, Giving What We Can USA, Long Term for Planet and People, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Quadrature Climate Foundation. No amounts or dates tying particular support to Behrens. Page says no primary government/corporate funding and no party funding; this is CFG's stated policy, not independently audited compliance.</p>\n<h2>Typed connection table</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Type</th>\n<th>Period</th>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>Registered director</td>\n<td>From 2023-08-22; active observed 2026-09-05</td>\n<td>S1</td>\n<td>No private decision record</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>Secure Future Research Ltd</td>\n<td>Registered voting control &gt;25% through 50%; director appointment/removal rights</td>\n<td>From 2023-08-22; active observed</td>\n<td>S2</td>\n<td>Voting rights, not claimed equity or unilateral sole control</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>Special Projects Lead</td>\n<td>Current team page observed 2026-09-05</td>\n<td>S3</td>\n<td>Job title alone gives no budget/signature delegation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>Operations work; organizational privacy contact</td>\n<td>2025 documented; current continuity uncertain</td>\n<td>S4/S10</td>\n<td>No demonstrated ownership</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>CFG/ICFG</td>\n<td>Advanced AI policy researcher</td>\n<td>Definitely May-Nov 2024; until Jan2025 self-reported</td>\n<td>S4/S7/S8/S9</td>\n<td>Start date unknown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>CDI/ITIF</td>\n<td>Policy fellowship</td>\n<td>By 2022-10-11</td>\n<td>S5/S6</td>\n<td>Historical employment; not present institutional mandate</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>OECD; BDI</td>\n<td>Prior professional work</td>\n<td>Before Oct2022</td>\n<td>S5</td>\n<td>Particular employment classification/dates not resolved</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>Pour Demain</td>\n<td>EU AI policy advice</td>\n<td>Date unspecified</td>\n<td>S4</td>\n<td>Self-reported; no contract/payment/decision power found</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>UCL</td>\n<td>MPA education</td>\n<td>Degree reported Oct2022</td>\n<td>S5</td>\n<td>Not a present governance role</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens</td>\n<td>Talos Network</td>\n<td>Fellowship/membership</td>\n<td>2022 indexed; membership self-confirmed</td>\n<td>S4/S11</td>\n<td>Award/payment not established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FLI; Coefficient Giving; SFF</td>\n<td>Talos Network</td>\n<td>Financial support</td>\n<td>Unspecified historical support disclosed 2026</td>\n<td>S12</td>\n<td>No amount or path to individual fellow established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dreamery; Tanka; Powoki</td>\n<td>CFG</td>\n<td>Seed/general institutional support</td>\n<td>Current retrospective disclosure</td>\n<td>S13</td>\n<td>Not ControlAI funding</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Eva Behrens and named coauthors</td>\n<td>IAI; Oxford Martin School</td>\n<td>Joint policy publication</td>\n<td>May/Nov2024</td>\n<td>S7/S8</td>\n<td>Publication/coauthorship, not publisher endorsement of ControlAI</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Closed branches and unknowns</h2>\n<p>The UCL exact student page was search-indexed (2021-22 MPA cohort, mechanical engineering/East Asian Studies degrees) but opening failed; use employer-confirmed MPA only in strong findings. The former Polaris website linked by Behrens redirects to unrelated gambling content; discarded, no inference about the historical program or her. The BDI linked report failed to open; employer bio corroborates BDI work. OECD and Pour Demain targeted searches did not yield independent details; no repeated recovery.</p>\n<p>No personal compensation, exact equity, private voting agreement, donor instructions, Behrens-specific government meeting list, or current Conjecture employment was established. Registered control is a direct power relation; most other findings establish professional formation, publication access or financial support to institutions. None establishes covert control or a common command structure.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Eva Behrens: public institutional connections \n Observed 2026-09-05. Bounded public-source inquiry. No outreach, private access, paid access, or personal-life research. Roles, legal control, coauthorship, network membership, and funding are distinct edges. Parent research covers political access and Conjecture investors. \n Findings \n Behrens has material formal authority at Secure Future Research Ltd (company 15088415, the UK ControlAI entity identified in the parent investigation), in addition to the public-facing Special Projects Lead title. Companies House lists her as an active director appointed 22 August 2023 and an active person with significant control: more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, plus rights to appoint/remove directors. Andrea Miotti is the other active director/PSC. Nicolas Moes resigned/ceased control on 7 November 2023. These are registered declarations, not proof of each person's day-to-day decisions. Do not call the voting percentage an equity share in a company limited by guarantee. \n Her corroborated trajectory runs from European industrial/economic and innovation-policy work into AI policy research, then Conjecture operations and ControlAI. An October 2022 employer biography identifies her as a Center for Data Innovation policy fellow, with prior OECD fiscal foresight and Federation of German Industries industrial/Sino-European policy experience, and an MPA from UCL. May and November 2024 publications independently document her CFG and Oxford Martin collaborative work. Her own site dates the end of her CFG work to January 2025. Conjecture's May 2025 privacy notice names her as organizational contact. The current ControlAI team lists Special Projects Lead. \n RECENCY: Her own website still labels Conjecture operations as current, but parent verified Connor Leahy's March 26, 2026 retrospective describing Conjecture's chapter ending. Treat Conjecture operations as a documented historical 2025 link, not confirmed simultaneous current employment. Link supplied by parent:  https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective  (not independently opened by this agent). \n The most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI. \n CFG's disclosed seed backing from Dreamery and Tanka, plus subsequent general/program funding, describes her former employer's support. It is not a demonstrated funding path to ControlAI. Oxford/IAI publications show access to established policy research channels, not employment or official government authority at those publishers. \n Source register and precise locations \n S1. Companies House, Secure Future Research Ltd officers.  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers  . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Active director entry and appointment date; other active director Miotti, former director Moes. Web text lines 30-91. Register warns it does not check accuracy of filed information. Personal address, birth details and nationality are unnecessary and omitted. \n S2. Companies House, persons with significant control.  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control  . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Behrens notified 2023-08-22; Nature of control fields lines 50-52. Miotti same categories, Moes ceased 2023-11-07. No exact percentage beyond the disclosed band, and no evidence about private voting arrangements. \n S3. ControlAI About Us.  https://controlai.org/about  . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Team lines 133-135: Eva Behrens, Special Projects Lead. Organization identifies UK company limited by guarantee; organization-wide legislative briefing claims do not establish that Behrens personally attended each meeting. No detailed job specification or internal delegated authority given. \n S4. Eva Behrens own professional site.  https://www.evabehrens.com/  . Opened/read 2026-09-05; undated. Lines 17-25 describe Conjecture operations, CFG until January 2025, CDI/ITIF, Pour Demain advice on EU AI priorities, OECD OPSI anticipatory-innovation work, BDI, Andritz procurement work, EF inaugural Polaris fellowship, Talos and UCL. Lines 28-39 list research outputs and conference presentation. These are self-reports; present-tense Conjecture role may be stale. Pour Demain, Andritz and Polaris specifics lack independent corroboration in this bounded inquiry. Her site says she contributed to A Narrow Path; no precise task/scope established here. \n S5. Center for Data Innovation, Social Media Should Not Be Blamed for Lower Trust in Public Institutions, 2022-10-11.  https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/  . Opened/read. Author biography at line 28 confirms policy fellow focused on European AI, prior OECD and BDI work, and UCL MPA. Article argues against inferring that social-media use causes institutional distrust and warns against censorship. This is a historical stated position, not evidence about every later policy proposal. \n S6. CDI institutional About page.  https://datainnovation.org/about/  . Opened/read 2026-09-05, undated current text. Lines 7-9 identify CDI as part of ITIF and host of AI Policy Network; supporters described as corporations, charitable foundations and individuals. No claim that Behrens belonged to every CDI network or personally received corporate money. ITIF supporter page was opened, but named funders and Behrens-era allocations were not extracted; no further inference. \n S7. Istituto Affari Internazionali, Enhancing Global AI Governance through Compute Resource Management, 2024-05-24.  https://www.iai.it/it/pubblicazioni/enhancing-global-ai-governance-through-compute-resource-management  . Opened/read. Authors Behrens, David Janku, Bengusu Ozcan, Max Reddel (lines 59-69); author affiliation at 104 explicitly identifies Behrens/Janku as ICFG Advanced AI Researchers. Proposes a G7-backed, internationally co-governed compute standards institution, compute registry and impact assessment. Publication proves coauthorship and policy advocacy, not that the proposed consortium exists or that G7 governments endorsed it. \n S8. Oxford Martin School, What Should Be Internationalised in AI Governance?, 2024-11-13.  https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/what-should-be-internationalised-in-ai-governance  . Opened/read. Author list line 21 includes Behrens alongside Claire Dennis, Stephen Clare, Rebecca Hawkins, Morgan Simpson, Gillian Diebold, Zaheed Kara, Ruofei Wang, Robert Trager, Matthijs Maas, Noam Kolt, Markus Anderljung, Konstantin Pilz, Anka Reuel, Malcolm Murray, Lennart Heim and Marta Ziosi. This establishes joint authorship, not an Oxford employment/degree or each coauthor's endorsement of ControlAI. The abstract supports selective international coordination, with lower/mixed benefits for some policy areas. \n S9. CFG, Establishing AI Risk Thresholds: A Comparative Analysis Across High-Risk Sectors.  https://cfg.eu/wp-content/uploads/CFG-Establishing-ai-risk-thresholds-report.pdf  . Opened/read selected relevant sections, 33 pages. Page 1 lists Behrens/Ozcan; page 33 identifies Behrens as Advanced AI researcher for international policy/governance. Analysis includes information as of late October 2024; exact publication date not established from PDF. It argues for externally set risk thresholds and independent oversight, comparing AI with other safety-critical industries. Self-site says presented at UK AISI conference in 2024; parent handles official event corroboration. \n S10. Conjecture Privacy Policy.  https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy  . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Updated May 14, 2025 (lines 42-44), names Eva Behrens under organization contact details (49-51). Further identifies Conjecture Inc. and Ltd. as covered entities (102-114). Corroborates a formal organizational operational contact at that period, not ownership or current continuing employment. \n S11. Talos Network alumni directory.  https://www.talosnetwork.org/alumni-network  . Opened 2026-09-05 but dynamic roster did not render in extracted text. Publisher SEARCH-INDEXED result explicitly lists Eva Behrens, Talos Fellow 2022, current ControlAI Special Projects Lead; also lists Anna Bruvere as a 2022 fellow. Thus cohort/date is indexed-only; self-site directly confirms membership. Directory co-membership is not proof of personal collaboration with every other fellow. \n S12. Talos Network Donate.  https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate  . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Funding Sources paragraph, line 74, acknowledges Coefficient Giving, FLI, Survival and Flourishing Fund, independent donors, and disclaims donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. No dates/amounts, no individual awards. Donations described as supporting training and placements in government/think tanks/civil society; this is a stated institutional talent-development strategy. \n S13. CFG Funding.  https://cfg.eu/funding/  . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Lines 9-20: seed Dreamery (associated with CFG cofounder Steven Schuurman) and Tanka cover first five years' baseline; general support Powoki. Current program support lists ARIA, ACX/Manifund, AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund (Transatlantic), DAFgiving360 via LAD Climate Fund, Giving What We Can USA, Long Term for Planet and People, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Quadrature Climate Foundation. No amounts or dates tying particular support to Behrens. Page says no primary government/corporate funding and no party funding; this is CFG's stated policy, not independently audited compliance. \n Typed connection table \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Type \n Period \n Source \n Limit \n \n \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n Registered director \n From 2023-08-22; active observed 2026-09-05 \n S1 \n No private decision record \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n Secure Future Research Ltd \n Registered voting control >25% through 50%; director appointment/removal rights \n From 2023-08-22; active observed \n S2 \n Voting rights, not claimed equity or unilateral sole control \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n ControlAI \n Special Projects Lead \n Current team page observed 2026-09-05 \n S3 \n Job title alone gives no budget/signature delegation \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n Conjecture \n Operations work; organizational privacy contact \n 2025 documented; current continuity uncertain \n S4/S10 \n No demonstrated ownership \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n CFG/ICFG \n Advanced AI policy researcher \n Definitely May-Nov 2024; until Jan2025 self-reported \n S4/S7/S8/S9 \n Start date unknown \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n CDI/ITIF \n Policy fellowship \n By 2022-10-11 \n S5/S6 \n Historical employment; not present institutional mandate \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n OECD; BDI \n Prior professional work \n Before Oct2022 \n S5 \n Particular employment classification/dates not resolved \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n Pour Demain \n EU AI policy advice \n Date unspecified \n S4 \n Self-reported; no contract/payment/decision power found \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n UCL \n MPA education \n Degree reported Oct2022 \n S5 \n Not a present governance role \n \n \n Eva Behrens \n Talos Network \n Fellowship/membership \n 2022 indexed; membership self-confirmed \n S4/S11 \n Award/payment not established \n \n \n FLI; Coefficient Giving; SFF \n Talos Network \n Financial support \n Unspecified historical support disclosed 2026 \n S12 \n No amount or path to individual fellow established \n \n \n Dreamery; Tanka; Powoki \n CFG \n Seed/general institutional support \n Current retrospective disclosure \n S13 \n Not ControlAI funding \n \n \n Eva Behrens and named coauthors \n IAI; Oxford Martin School \n Joint policy publication \n May/Nov2024 \n S7/S8 \n Publication/coauthorship, not publisher endorsement of ControlAI \n \n \n \n Closed branches and unknowns \n The UCL exact student page was search-indexed (2021-22 MPA cohort, mechanical engineering/East Asian Studies degrees) but opening failed; use employer-confirmed MPA only in strong findings. The former Polaris website linked by Behrens redirects to unrelated gambling content; discarded, no inference about the historical program or her. The BDI linked report failed to open; employer bio corroborates BDI work. OECD and Pour Demain targeted searches did not yield independent details; no repeated recovery. \n No personal compensation, exact equity, private voting agreement, donor instructions, Behrens-specific government meeting list, or current Conjecture employment was established. Registered control is a direct power relation; most other findings establish professional formation, publication access or financial support to institutions. None establishes covert control or a common command structure. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/controlai/behrens-connections.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Eva Behrens: public institutional connections\n\nObserved 2026-09-05. Bounded public-source inquiry. No outreach, private access, paid access, or personal-life research. Roles, legal control, coauthorship, network membership, and funding are distinct edges. Parent research covers political access and Conjecture investors.\n\n## Findings\n\nBehrens has material formal authority at Secure Future Research Ltd (company 15088415, the UK ControlAI entity identified in the parent investigation), in addition to the public-facing Special Projects Lead title. Companies House lists her as an active director appointed 22 August 2023 and an active person with significant control: more than 25% and no more than 50% of voting rights, plus rights to appoint/remove directors. Andrea Miotti is the other active director/PSC. Nicolas Moes resigned/ceased control on 7 November 2023. These are registered declarations, not proof of each person's day-to-day decisions. Do not call the voting percentage an equity share in a company limited by guarantee.\n\nHer corroborated trajectory runs from European industrial/economic and innovation-policy work into AI policy research, then Conjecture operations and ControlAI. An October 2022 employer biography identifies her as a Center for Data Innovation policy fellow, with prior OECD fiscal foresight and Federation of German Industries industrial/Sino-European policy experience, and an MPA from UCL. May and November 2024 publications independently document her CFG and Oxford Martin collaborative work. Her own site dates the end of her CFG work to January 2025. Conjecture's May 2025 privacy notice names her as organizational contact. The current ControlAI team lists Special Projects Lead.\n\nRECENCY: Her own website still labels Conjecture operations as current, but parent verified Connor Leahy's March 26, 2026 retrospective describing Conjecture's chapter ending. Treat Conjecture operations as a documented historical 2025 link, not confirmed simultaneous current employment. Link supplied by parent: https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective (not independently opened by this agent).\n\nThe most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI.\n\nCFG's disclosed seed backing from Dreamery and Tanka, plus subsequent general/program funding, describes her former employer's support. It is not a demonstrated funding path to ControlAI. Oxford/IAI publications show access to established policy research channels, not employment or official government authority at those publishers.\n\n## Source register and precise locations\n\nS1. Companies House, Secure Future Research Ltd officers. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/officers . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Active director entry and appointment date; other active director Miotti, former director Moes. Web text lines 30-91. Register warns it does not check accuracy of filed information. Personal address, birth details and nationality are unnecessary and omitted.\n\nS2. Companies House, persons with significant control. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Behrens notified 2023-08-22; Nature of control fields lines 50-52. Miotti same categories, Moes ceased 2023-11-07. No exact percentage beyond the disclosed band, and no evidence about private voting arrangements.\n\nS3. ControlAI About Us. https://controlai.org/about . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Team lines 133-135: Eva Behrens, Special Projects Lead. Organization identifies UK company limited by guarantee; organization-wide legislative briefing claims do not establish that Behrens personally attended each meeting. No detailed job specification or internal delegated authority given.\n\nS4. Eva Behrens own professional site. https://www.evabehrens.com/ . Opened/read 2026-09-05; undated. Lines 17-25 describe Conjecture operations, CFG until January 2025, CDI/ITIF, Pour Demain advice on EU AI priorities, OECD OPSI anticipatory-innovation work, BDI, Andritz procurement work, EF inaugural Polaris fellowship, Talos and UCL. Lines 28-39 list research outputs and conference presentation. These are self-reports; present-tense Conjecture role may be stale. Pour Demain, Andritz and Polaris specifics lack independent corroboration in this bounded inquiry. Her site says she contributed to A Narrow Path; no precise task/scope established here.\n\nS5. Center for Data Innovation, Social Media Should Not Be Blamed for Lower Trust in Public Institutions, 2022-10-11. https://datainnovation.org/2022/10/social-media-should-not-be-blamed-for-lower-trust-in-public-institutions/ . Opened/read. Author biography at line 28 confirms policy fellow focused on European AI, prior OECD and BDI work, and UCL MPA. Article argues against inferring that social-media use causes institutional distrust and warns against censorship. This is a historical stated position, not evidence about every later policy proposal.\n\nS6. CDI institutional About page. https://datainnovation.org/about/ . Opened/read 2026-09-05, undated current text. Lines 7-9 identify CDI as part of ITIF and host of AI Policy Network; supporters described as corporations, charitable foundations and individuals. No claim that Behrens belonged to every CDI network or personally received corporate money. ITIF supporter page was opened, but named funders and Behrens-era allocations were not extracted; no further inference.\n\nS7. Istituto Affari Internazionali, Enhancing Global AI Governance through Compute Resource Management, 2024-05-24. https://www.iai.it/it/pubblicazioni/enhancing-global-ai-governance-through-compute-resource-management . Opened/read. Authors Behrens, David Janku, Bengusu Ozcan, Max Reddel (lines 59-69); author affiliation at 104 explicitly identifies Behrens/Janku as ICFG Advanced AI Researchers. Proposes a G7-backed, internationally co-governed compute standards institution, compute registry and impact assessment. Publication proves coauthorship and policy advocacy, not that the proposed consortium exists or that G7 governments endorsed it.\n\nS8. Oxford Martin School, What Should Be Internationalised in AI Governance?, 2024-11-13. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/what-should-be-internationalised-in-ai-governance . Opened/read. Author list line 21 includes Behrens alongside Claire Dennis, Stephen Clare, Rebecca Hawkins, Morgan Simpson, Gillian Diebold, Zaheed Kara, Ruofei Wang, Robert Trager, Matthijs Maas, Noam Kolt, Markus Anderljung, Konstantin Pilz, Anka Reuel, Malcolm Murray, Lennart Heim and Marta Ziosi. This establishes joint authorship, not an Oxford employment/degree or each coauthor's endorsement of ControlAI. The abstract supports selective international coordination, with lower/mixed benefits for some policy areas.\n\nS9. CFG, Establishing AI Risk Thresholds: A Comparative Analysis Across High-Risk Sectors. https://cfg.eu/wp-content/uploads/CFG-Establishing-ai-risk-thresholds-report.pdf . Opened/read selected relevant sections, 33 pages. Page 1 lists Behrens/Ozcan; page 33 identifies Behrens as Advanced AI researcher for international policy/governance. Analysis includes information as of late October 2024; exact publication date not established from PDF. It argues for externally set risk thresholds and independent oversight, comparing AI with other safety-critical industries. Self-site says presented at UK AISI conference in 2024; parent handles official event corroboration.\n\nS10. Conjecture Privacy Policy. https://www.conjecture.dev/privacy-policy . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Updated May 14, 2025 (lines 42-44), names Eva Behrens under organization contact details (49-51). Further identifies Conjecture Inc. and Ltd. as covered entities (102-114). Corroborates a formal organizational operational contact at that period, not ownership or current continuing employment.\n\nS11. Talos Network alumni directory. https://www.talosnetwork.org/alumni-network . Opened 2026-09-05 but dynamic roster did not render in extracted text. Publisher SEARCH-INDEXED result explicitly lists Eva Behrens, Talos Fellow 2022, current ControlAI Special Projects Lead; also lists Anna Bruvere as a 2022 fellow. Thus cohort/date is indexed-only; self-site directly confirms membership. Directory co-membership is not proof of personal collaboration with every other fellow.\n\nS12. Talos Network Donate. https://www.talosnetwork.org/donate . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Funding Sources paragraph, line 74, acknowledges Coefficient Giving, FLI, Survival and Flourishing Fund, independent donors, and disclaims donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. No dates/amounts, no individual awards. Donations described as supporting training and placements in government/think tanks/civil society; this is a stated institutional talent-development strategy.\n\nS13. CFG Funding. https://cfg.eu/funding/ . Opened/read 2026-09-05. Lines 9-20: seed Dreamery (associated with CFG cofounder Steven Schuurman) and Tanka cover first five years' baseline; general support Powoki. Current program support lists ARIA, ACX/Manifund, AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund (Transatlantic), DAFgiving360 via LAD Climate Fund, Giving What We Can USA, Long Term for Planet and People, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Quadrature Climate Foundation. No amounts or dates tying particular support to Behrens. Page says no primary government/corporate funding and no party funding; this is CFG's stated policy, not independently audited compliance.\n\n## Typed connection table\n\n| From | To | Type | Period | Source | Limit |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Eva Behrens | Secure Future Research Ltd | Registered director | From 2023-08-22; active observed 2026-09-05 | S1 | No private decision record |\n| Eva Behrens | Secure Future Research Ltd | Registered voting control >25% through 50%; director appointment/removal rights | From 2023-08-22; active observed | S2 | Voting rights, not claimed equity or unilateral sole control |\n| Eva Behrens | ControlAI | Special Projects Lead | Current team page observed 2026-09-05 | S3 | Job title alone gives no budget/signature delegation |\n| Eva Behrens | Conjecture | Operations work; organizational privacy contact | 2025 documented; current continuity uncertain | S4/S10 | No demonstrated ownership |\n| Eva Behrens | CFG/ICFG | Advanced AI policy researcher | Definitely May-Nov 2024; until Jan2025 self-reported | S4/S7/S8/S9 | Start date unknown |\n| Eva Behrens | CDI/ITIF | Policy fellowship | By 2022-10-11 | S5/S6 | Historical employment; not present institutional mandate |\n| Eva Behrens | OECD; BDI | Prior professional work | Before Oct2022 | S5 | Particular employment classification/dates not resolved |\n| Eva Behrens | Pour Demain | EU AI policy advice | Date unspecified | S4 | Self-reported; no contract/payment/decision power found |\n| Eva Behrens | UCL | MPA education | Degree reported Oct2022 | S5 | Not a present governance role |\n| Eva Behrens | Talos Network | Fellowship/membership | 2022 indexed; membership self-confirmed | S4/S11 | Award/payment not established |\n| FLI; Coefficient Giving; SFF | Talos Network | Financial support | Unspecified historical support disclosed 2026 | S12 | No amount or path to individual fellow established |\n| Dreamery; Tanka; Powoki | CFG | Seed/general institutional support | Current retrospective disclosure | S13 | Not ControlAI funding |\n| Eva Behrens and named coauthors | IAI; Oxford Martin School | Joint policy publication | May/Nov2024 | S7/S8 | Publication/coauthorship, not publisher endorsement of ControlAI |\n\n## Closed branches and unknowns\n\nThe UCL exact student page was search-indexed (2021-22 MPA cohort, mechanical engineering/East Asian Studies degrees) but opening failed; use employer-confirmed MPA only in strong findings. The former Polaris website linked by Behrens redirects to unrelated gambling content; discarded, no inference about the historical program or her. The BDI linked report failed to open; employer bio corroborates BDI work. OECD and Pour Demain targeted searches did not yield independent details; no repeated recovery.\n\nNo personal compensation, exact equity, private voting agreement, donor instructions, Behrens-specific government meeting list, or current Conjecture employment was established. Registered control is a direct power relation; most other findings establish professional formation, publication access or financial support to institutions. None establishes covert control or a common command structure."
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-controlai-conjecture-factions",
        "title": "Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks</h1>\n<p>Bounded public-source inquiry, 5 September 2026. No outreach. Seven principal source URLs, counting the original debate video separately from its publisher's readable podcast description. This is a chronology of affiliations, statements and disputes, not a judgment on the truth of the participants' risk models.</p>\n<p>The supported sequence is: EleutherAI/open-source roots; a safety-focused startup with venture investors; discussions and later conflict with parts of the EA/technical-safety community; public opposition to e/acc; then Leahy's transition into ControlAI. No reviewed primary statement establishes that Conjecture or Leahy was formerly an e/acc member. A break with EA is explicitly attested. These labels must remain distinct.</p>\n<h2>Dated evidence</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Date</th>\n<th>Observed event</th>\n<th>What it establishes</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>8 Apr 2022</td>\n<td>Conjecture's launch identifies founders Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour, with founders/early employees largely drawn from EleutherAI. Its stated mission was alignment research, including work with models while avoiding advancing the capabilities frontier. It adopted internal review of disclosures.</td>\n<td>A contemporaneous safety mission and open-source personnel roots, not an e/acc origin. S01</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Aug 2022, recalled in a Jun 2023 reply</td>\n<td>Conjecture's C-Suite says it discussed plans with approximately 15 regrantors and the FTX Future Fund team.</td>\n<td>A directly acknowledged EA funding-network discussion. It does not establish a grant award, amount, or present relationship. S03</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Approximately end of Conjecture year one</td>\n<td>In 2026 Leahy says he severed EA ties around the end of the first year. He dates company kickoff to 1 Mar 2022, making late 2022/early 2023 an approximate inference, not a documented resignation date.</td>\n<td>Leahy's retrospective account of a break with core EA; no named list of severed relationships. S02</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>26 Dec 2022</td>\n<td>The e/acc newsletter published an explainer, incorporating August 2022 posts. Its program explicitly included building AGI, increasing energy use, growth and expanding civilization.</td>\n<td>A dated account of e/acc's own agenda. This retrieved page does not name Conjecture or Leahy as members; it does not establish the movement's exact founding date. S04</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>12 Jun 2023, with revisions through 16 Jun</td>\n<td>A critical EA Forum post includes a signed Conjecture C-Suite response. Conjecture says it opposed EA actors' support for AGI laboratories, GPT-4's release, and ARC's evaluation role; it advocated stopping superintelligence development.</td>\n<td>Contemporaneous public strategic conflict within the broader safety world. Its criticism of those actors is its stated position, not independently established wrongdoing. The anonymous critics disputed Conjecture's explanation of their motives. S03</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Early Feb 2024</td>\n<td>MLST published Leahy debating Guillaume Verdon/Beff Jezos. The publisher portrays Leahy as challenging accelerationism and arguing for regulation, with Verdon emphasizing growth and opposing excessive centralized control.</td>\n<td>Direct public adversarial engagement with e/acc's founder. No prior membership or organizational divorce follows. Readable podcast page dated 3 Feb; secondary video indexes report 2 Feb. S05/S06</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>26 Mar 2026</td>\n<td>Leahy publishes a closing retrospective, describes Conjecture's unsuccessful technical/product effort, and announces joining ControlAI US. He criticizes both core EA and accelerationism, while thanking early investor Nat.</td>\n<td>His public account of institutional and ideological transition. It does not show all former investors or colleagues breaking with him. S02</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>What broke, and with whom?</h2>\n<p>The clearest documented rupture is Leahy/Conjecture leadership versus parts of the EA-linked technical AI safety establishment. The 2023 response is contemporaneous evidence of disagreements over whether laboratories should keep developing increasingly capable AI and whether safety evaluations legitimize that development. The opposing post also raised research-quality and governance concerns. This is evidence that the dispute existed; its contested accusations are not findings of this inquiry. [S03]</p>\n<p>His EleutherAI origins are a different relationship: founders and colleagues carried technical experience from an open-source collective into a company publicly committed to safety research. Work on open models can have acceleration effects without amounting to membership in effective accelerationism. Likewise, a later disagreement with e/acc does not tell us whether there was an earlier organizational tie. [S01/S05]</p>\n<h2>Investors: documented money connection, unestablished faction membership</h2>\n<p>The April 2022 announcement names venture backing from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy and Sam Bankman-Fried, among others. It says the founders retained complete company control. The dates, amounts and present status of individual stakes are undisclosed there. [S01]</p>\n<p>This pass found no adequate dated primary source establishing which of those investors self-identified as e/acc when investing in Conjecture. Search results included retrospective commentary and third-party ideological labels; these were not promoted to evidence. Even a verified investor's accelerationist views would establish that investor's position, not automatic faction membership for Conjecture. No investor exit or repudiation caused by the EA/e/acc disputes was established.</p>\n<h2>Source ledger and reading status</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>ID</th>\n<th>Exact URL</th>\n<th>Date</th>\n<th>Status / scope</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>S01</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup</a></td>\n<td>8 Apr 2022</td>\n<td>Primary organization announcement, opened/read. Founders, roots, investors, mission and claimed founder control.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S02</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective</a></td>\n<td>26 Mar 2026</td>\n<td>Primary first-person retrospective, opened/read. EA rupture, approximate timing, company closure and ControlAI transition. Retrospective self-report, not independent verification of motives.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S03</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture</a></td>\n<td>12 Jun 2023; revisions through 16 Jun</td>\n<td>Opened/read. Primary dispute record: pseudonymous Omega criticism and the reproduced, signed Conjecture C-Suite reply. The reply is first-party testimony hosted by critics; allegations remain attributed.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S04</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com/p/what-the-f-is-eacc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com/p/what-the-f-is-eacc</a></td>\n<td>26 Dec 2022; embeds Aug 2022 posts</td>\n<td>Primary movement publication, opened/read. Explicit program and dated public use of e/acc label.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S05</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/showdown-between-e-acc-leader-and-doomer-connor-leahy/id1510472996?i=1000644059086\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/showdown-between-e-acc-leader-and-doomer-connor-leahy/id1510472996?i=1000644059086</a></td>\n<td>3 Feb 2024, 21:00 UTC</td>\n<td>Publisher-provided episode description and chapter list opened/read; audio not transcribed/listened. Direct evidence of invited debate and advertised disagreement.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S06</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxi0xSBOaQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxi0xSBOaQ</a></td>\n<td>Linked original episode; secondary indexes date 2 Feb 2024</td>\n<td>Original video URL recovered from readable publisher source; web retrieval yielded title only. No transcript read.</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>S07</td>\n<td><a href=\"https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-18/ai-insiders-eacc-movement-speeding-up-tech/103464258\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-18/ai-insiders-eacc-movement-speeding-up-tech/103464258</a></td>\n<td>18 Feb 2024</td>\n<td>Secondary contemporaneous reporting opened/read, corroborates public opposition. Not needed for claims about former affiliation or founding motives.</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Typed relationships</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Type</th>\n<th>Period</th>\n<th>Source</th>\n<th>Limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Leahy, Black, Alfour / early Conjecture staff</td>\n<td>EleutherAI</td>\n<td>prior professional/community roots</td>\n<td>Before Apr 2022</td>\n<td>S01</td>\n<td>No e/acc inference</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Named venture investors</td>\n<td>Conjecture</td>\n<td>disclosed investment</td>\n<td>Apr 2022 announcement</td>\n<td>S01</td>\n<td>Amounts and ideological conditions unknown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Conjecture C-Suite</td>\n<td>FTX Future Fund team / approximately 15 regrantors</td>\n<td>acknowledged strategy/funding discussions</td>\n<td>Aug 2022</td>\n<td>S03</td>\n<td>Discussion is not an award</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Leahy</td>\n<td>core EA</td>\n<td>self-described severance of ties</td>\n<td>Approximate end of company year one, stated Mar 2026</td>\n<td>S02</td>\n<td>Individual/organizational scope unspecified</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Conjecture C-Suite</td>\n<td>parts of EA/Bay Area technical-safety leadership</td>\n<td>public strategic dispute</td>\n<td>Jun 2023</td>\n<td>S03</td>\n<td>Does not make all EA actors one faction</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Leahy</td>\n<td>Guillaume Verdon / Beff Jezos</td>\n<td>adversarial public debate</td>\n<td>Early Feb 2024</td>\n<td>S05/S06</td>\n<td>Opposition, not proof of earlier membership</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Leahy</td>\n<td>ControlAI US</td>\n<td>announced leadership move</td>\n<td>Mar 2026</td>\n<td>S02</td>\n<td>Transition already verified in separate current-role research</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<p>The remaining branch is narrow: a dated self-identification, membership statement, organizational partnership, or explicit first-person account of leaving e/acc would be needed to establish the hypothesized early e/acc connection and subsequent break. None was located in this bounded pass. The EA split and open-source roots have substantially stronger evidence.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks \n Bounded public-source inquiry, 5 September 2026. No outreach. Seven principal source URLs, counting the original debate video separately from its publisher's readable podcast description. This is a chronology of affiliations, statements and disputes, not a judgment on the truth of the participants' risk models. \n The supported sequence is: EleutherAI/open-source roots; a safety-focused startup with venture investors; discussions and later conflict with parts of the EA/technical-safety community; public opposition to e/acc; then Leahy's transition into ControlAI. No reviewed primary statement establishes that Conjecture or Leahy was formerly an e/acc member. A break with EA is explicitly attested. These labels must remain distinct. \n Dated evidence \n \n \n \n Date \n Observed event \n What it establishes \n \n \n \n \n 8 Apr 2022 \n Conjecture's launch identifies founders Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour, with founders/early employees largely drawn from EleutherAI. Its stated mission was alignment research, including work with models while avoiding advancing the capabilities frontier. It adopted internal review of disclosures. \n A contemporaneous safety mission and open-source personnel roots, not an e/acc origin. S01 \n \n \n Aug 2022, recalled in a Jun 2023 reply \n Conjecture's C-Suite says it discussed plans with approximately 15 regrantors and the FTX Future Fund team. \n A directly acknowledged EA funding-network discussion. It does not establish a grant award, amount, or present relationship. S03 \n \n \n Approximately end of Conjecture year one \n In 2026 Leahy says he severed EA ties around the end of the first year. He dates company kickoff to 1 Mar 2022, making late 2022/early 2023 an approximate inference, not a documented resignation date. \n Leahy's retrospective account of a break with core EA; no named list of severed relationships. S02 \n \n \n 26 Dec 2022 \n The e/acc newsletter published an explainer, incorporating August 2022 posts. Its program explicitly included building AGI, increasing energy use, growth and expanding civilization. \n A dated account of e/acc's own agenda. This retrieved page does not name Conjecture or Leahy as members; it does not establish the movement's exact founding date. S04 \n \n \n 12 Jun 2023, with revisions through 16 Jun \n A critical EA Forum post includes a signed Conjecture C-Suite response. Conjecture says it opposed EA actors' support for AGI laboratories, GPT-4's release, and ARC's evaluation role; it advocated stopping superintelligence development. \n Contemporaneous public strategic conflict within the broader safety world. Its criticism of those actors is its stated position, not independently established wrongdoing. The anonymous critics disputed Conjecture's explanation of their motives. S03 \n \n \n Early Feb 2024 \n MLST published Leahy debating Guillaume Verdon/Beff Jezos. The publisher portrays Leahy as challenging accelerationism and arguing for regulation, with Verdon emphasizing growth and opposing excessive centralized control. \n Direct public adversarial engagement with e/acc's founder. No prior membership or organizational divorce follows. Readable podcast page dated 3 Feb; secondary video indexes report 2 Feb. S05/S06 \n \n \n 26 Mar 2026 \n Leahy publishes a closing retrospective, describes Conjecture's unsuccessful technical/product effort, and announces joining ControlAI US. He criticizes both core EA and accelerationism, while thanking early investor Nat. \n His public account of institutional and ideological transition. It does not show all former investors or colleagues breaking with him. S02 \n \n \n \n What broke, and with whom? \n The clearest documented rupture is Leahy/Conjecture leadership versus parts of the EA-linked technical AI safety establishment. The 2023 response is contemporaneous evidence of disagreements over whether laboratories should keep developing increasingly capable AI and whether safety evaluations legitimize that development. The opposing post also raised research-quality and governance concerns. This is evidence that the dispute existed; its contested accusations are not findings of this inquiry. [S03] \n His EleutherAI origins are a different relationship: founders and colleagues carried technical experience from an open-source collective into a company publicly committed to safety research. Work on open models can have acceleration effects without amounting to membership in effective accelerationism. Likewise, a later disagreement with e/acc does not tell us whether there was an earlier organizational tie. [S01/S05] \n Investors: documented money connection, unestablished faction membership \n The April 2022 announcement names venture backing from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy and Sam Bankman-Fried, among others. It says the founders retained complete company control. The dates, amounts and present status of individual stakes are undisclosed there. [S01] \n This pass found no adequate dated primary source establishing which of those investors self-identified as e/acc when investing in Conjecture. Search results included retrospective commentary and third-party ideological labels; these were not promoted to evidence. Even a verified investor's accelerationist views would establish that investor's position, not automatic faction membership for Conjecture. No investor exit or repudiation caused by the EA/e/acc disputes was established. \n Source ledger and reading status \n \n \n \n ID \n Exact URL \n Date \n Status / scope \n \n \n \n \n S01 \n  https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup  \n 8 Apr 2022 \n Primary organization announcement, opened/read. Founders, roots, investors, mission and claimed founder control. \n \n \n S02 \n  https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective  \n 26 Mar 2026 \n Primary first-person retrospective, opened/read. EA rupture, approximate timing, company closure and ControlAI transition. Retrospective self-report, not independent verification of motives. \n \n \n S03 \n  https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture  \n 12 Jun 2023; revisions through 16 Jun \n Opened/read. Primary dispute record: pseudonymous Omega criticism and the reproduced, signed Conjecture C-Suite reply. The reply is first-party testimony hosted by critics; allegations remain attributed. \n \n \n S04 \n  https://effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com/p/what-the-f-is-eacc  \n 26 Dec 2022; embeds Aug 2022 posts \n Primary movement publication, opened/read. Explicit program and dated public use of e/acc label. \n \n \n S05 \n  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/showdown-between-e-acc-leader-and-doomer-connor-leahy/id1510472996?i=1000644059086  \n 3 Feb 2024, 21:00 UTC \n Publisher-provided episode description and chapter list opened/read; audio not transcribed/listened. Direct evidence of invited debate and advertised disagreement. \n \n \n S06 \n  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxi0xSBOaQ  \n Linked original episode; secondary indexes date 2 Feb 2024 \n Original video URL recovered from readable publisher source; web retrieval yielded title only. No transcript read. \n \n \n S07 \n  https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-18/ai-insiders-eacc-movement-speeding-up-tech/103464258  \n 18 Feb 2024 \n Secondary contemporaneous reporting opened/read, corroborates public opposition. Not needed for claims about former affiliation or founding motives. \n \n \n \n Typed relationships \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Type \n Period \n Source \n Limit \n \n \n \n \n Leahy, Black, Alfour / early Conjecture staff \n EleutherAI \n prior professional/community roots \n Before Apr 2022 \n S01 \n No e/acc inference \n \n \n Named venture investors \n Conjecture \n disclosed investment \n Apr 2022 announcement \n S01 \n Amounts and ideological conditions unknown \n \n \n Conjecture C-Suite \n FTX Future Fund team / approximately 15 regrantors \n acknowledged strategy/funding discussions \n Aug 2022 \n S03 \n Discussion is not an award \n \n \n Leahy \n core EA \n self-described severance of ties \n Approximate end of company year one, stated Mar 2026 \n S02 \n Individual/organizational scope unspecified \n \n \n Conjecture C-Suite \n parts of EA/Bay Area technical-safety leadership \n public strategic dispute \n Jun 2023 \n S03 \n Does not make all EA actors one faction \n \n \n Leahy \n Guillaume Verdon / Beff Jezos \n adversarial public debate \n Early Feb 2024 \n S05/S06 \n Opposition, not proof of earlier membership \n \n \n Leahy \n ControlAI US \n announced leadership move \n Mar 2026 \n S02 \n Transition already verified in separate current-role research \n \n \n \n The remaining branch is narrow: a dated self-identification, membership statement, organizational partnership, or explicit first-person account of leaving e/acc would be needed to establish the hypothesized early e/acc connection and subsequent break. None was located in this bounded pass. The EA split and open-source roots have substantially stronger evidence. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/controlai/conjecture-factions.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Conjecture: e/acc, effective altruism, and the documented breaks\n\nBounded public-source inquiry, 5 September 2026. No outreach. Seven principal source URLs, counting the original debate video separately from its publisher's readable podcast description. This is a chronology of affiliations, statements and disputes, not a judgment on the truth of the participants' risk models.\n\nThe supported sequence is: EleutherAI/open-source roots; a safety-focused startup with venture investors; discussions and later conflict with parts of the EA/technical-safety community; public opposition to e/acc; then Leahy's transition into ControlAI. No reviewed primary statement establishes that Conjecture or Leahy was formerly an e/acc member. A break with EA is explicitly attested. These labels must remain distinct.\n\n## Dated evidence\n\n| Date | Observed event | What it establishes |\n|---|---|---|\n| 8 Apr 2022 | Conjecture's launch identifies founders Connor Leahy, Sid Black and Gabriel Alfour, with founders/early employees largely drawn from EleutherAI. Its stated mission was alignment research, including work with models while avoiding advancing the capabilities frontier. It adopted internal review of disclosures. | A contemporaneous safety mission and open-source personnel roots, not an e/acc origin. S01 |\n| Aug 2022, recalled in a Jun 2023 reply | Conjecture's C-Suite says it discussed plans with approximately 15 regrantors and the FTX Future Fund team. | A directly acknowledged EA funding-network discussion. It does not establish a grant award, amount, or present relationship. S03 |\n| Approximately end of Conjecture year one | In 2026 Leahy says he severed EA ties around the end of the first year. He dates company kickoff to 1 Mar 2022, making late 2022/early 2023 an approximate inference, not a documented resignation date. | Leahy's retrospective account of a break with core EA; no named list of severed relationships. S02 |\n| 26 Dec 2022 | The e/acc newsletter published an explainer, incorporating August 2022 posts. Its program explicitly included building AGI, increasing energy use, growth and expanding civilization. | A dated account of e/acc's own agenda. This retrieved page does not name Conjecture or Leahy as members; it does not establish the movement's exact founding date. S04 |\n| 12 Jun 2023, with revisions through 16 Jun | A critical EA Forum post includes a signed Conjecture C-Suite response. Conjecture says it opposed EA actors' support for AGI laboratories, GPT-4's release, and ARC's evaluation role; it advocated stopping superintelligence development. | Contemporaneous public strategic conflict within the broader safety world. Its criticism of those actors is its stated position, not independently established wrongdoing. The anonymous critics disputed Conjecture's explanation of their motives. S03 |\n| Early Feb 2024 | MLST published Leahy debating Guillaume Verdon/Beff Jezos. The publisher portrays Leahy as challenging accelerationism and arguing for regulation, with Verdon emphasizing growth and opposing excessive centralized control. | Direct public adversarial engagement with e/acc's founder. No prior membership or organizational divorce follows. Readable podcast page dated 3 Feb; secondary video indexes report 2 Feb. S05/S06 |\n| 26 Mar 2026 | Leahy publishes a closing retrospective, describes Conjecture's unsuccessful technical/product effort, and announces joining ControlAI US. He criticizes both core EA and accelerationism, while thanking early investor Nat. | His public account of institutional and ideological transition. It does not show all former investors or colleagues breaking with him. S02 |\n\n## What broke, and with whom?\n\nThe clearest documented rupture is Leahy/Conjecture leadership versus parts of the EA-linked technical AI safety establishment. The 2023 response is contemporaneous evidence of disagreements over whether laboratories should keep developing increasingly capable AI and whether safety evaluations legitimize that development. The opposing post also raised research-quality and governance concerns. This is evidence that the dispute existed; its contested accusations are not findings of this inquiry. [S03]\n\nHis EleutherAI origins are a different relationship: founders and colleagues carried technical experience from an open-source collective into a company publicly committed to safety research. Work on open models can have acceleration effects without amounting to membership in effective accelerationism. Likewise, a later disagreement with e/acc does not tell us whether there was an earlier organizational tie. [S01/S05]\n\n## Investors: documented money connection, unestablished faction membership\n\nThe April 2022 announcement names venture backing from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, Patrick and John Collison, Arthur Breitman, Andrej Karpathy and Sam Bankman-Fried, among others. It says the founders retained complete company control. The dates, amounts and present status of individual stakes are undisclosed there. [S01]\n\nThis pass found no adequate dated primary source establishing which of those investors self-identified as e/acc when investing in Conjecture. Search results included retrospective commentary and third-party ideological labels; these were not promoted to evidence. Even a verified investor's accelerationist views would establish that investor's position, not automatic faction membership for Conjecture. No investor exit or repudiation caused by the EA/e/acc disputes was established.\n\n## Source ledger and reading status\n\n| ID | Exact URL | Date | Status / scope |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| S01 | https://www.conjecture.dev/research/we-are-conjecture-a-new-alignment-research-startup | 8 Apr 2022 | Primary organization announcement, opened/read. Founders, roots, investors, mission and claimed founder control. |\n| S02 | https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective | 26 Mar 2026 | Primary first-person retrospective, opened/read. EA rupture, approximate timing, company closure and ControlAI transition. Retrospective self-report, not independent verification of motives. |\n| S03 | https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gkfMLX4NWZdmpikto/critiques-of-prominent-ai-safety-labs-conjecture | 12 Jun 2023; revisions through 16 Jun | Opened/read. Primary dispute record: pseudonymous Omega criticism and the reproduced, signed Conjecture C-Suite reply. The reply is first-party testimony hosted by critics; allegations remain attributed. |\n| S04 | https://effectiveaccelerationism.substack.com/p/what-the-f-is-eacc | 26 Dec 2022; embeds Aug 2022 posts | Primary movement publication, opened/read. Explicit program and dated public use of e/acc label. |\n| S05 | https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/showdown-between-e-acc-leader-and-doomer-connor-leahy/id1510472996?i=1000644059086 | 3 Feb 2024, 21:00 UTC | Publisher-provided episode description and chapter list opened/read; audio not transcribed/listened. Direct evidence of invited debate and advertised disagreement. |\n| S06 | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zxi0xSBOaQ | Linked original episode; secondary indexes date 2 Feb 2024 | Original video URL recovered from readable publisher source; web retrieval yielded title only. No transcript read. |\n| S07 | https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-18/ai-insiders-eacc-movement-speeding-up-tech/103464258 | 18 Feb 2024 | Secondary contemporaneous reporting opened/read, corroborates public opposition. Not needed for claims about former affiliation or founding motives. |\n\n## Typed relationships\n\n| From | To | Type | Period | Source | Limit |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Leahy, Black, Alfour / early Conjecture staff | EleutherAI | prior professional/community roots | Before Apr 2022 | S01 | No e/acc inference |\n| Named venture investors | Conjecture | disclosed investment | Apr 2022 announcement | S01 | Amounts and ideological conditions unknown |\n| Conjecture C-Suite | FTX Future Fund team / approximately 15 regrantors | acknowledged strategy/funding discussions | Aug 2022 | S03 | Discussion is not an award |\n| Leahy | core EA | self-described severance of ties | Approximate end of company year one, stated Mar 2026 | S02 | Individual/organizational scope unspecified |\n| Conjecture C-Suite | parts of EA/Bay Area technical-safety leadership | public strategic dispute | Jun 2023 | S03 | Does not make all EA actors one faction |\n| Leahy | Guillaume Verdon / Beff Jezos | adversarial public debate | Early Feb 2024 | S05/S06 | Opposition, not proof of earlier membership |\n| Leahy | ControlAI US | announced leadership move | Mar 2026 | S02 | Transition already verified in separate current-role research |\n\nThe remaining branch is narrow: a dated self-identification, membership statement, organizational partnership, or explicit first-person account of leaving e/acc would be needed to establish the hypothesized early e/acc connection and subsequent break. None was located in this bounded pass. The EA split and open-source roots have substantially stronger evidence.\n\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-controlai-controlai-upstream-followup",
        "title": "ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up</h1>\n<p>Observed 2026-09-05. Bounded public-source inquiry in six groups: direct fundraising disclosures; platform grant records; US nonprofit identity/filing; named grantmaker searches; Conjecture resources/transition; independence and adjacent institutional links. No outreach, private access, paid access or publication. UK accounts already examined by parent were not reopened.</p>\n<h2>Result</h2>\n<p>This pass found a new US legal-entity/financial lead and a concrete prospective grant application, but did not identify an independently verified donor-to-ControlAI transfer or binding donor conditions. The strongest new distinction is between money the US entity reportedly received in 2025, money requested in a July 2026 application, and the much larger hypothetical budgets advertised in an April fundraising pitch.</p>\n<p>The relationship to Conjecture is well documented through people and collaborative work. It remains unproved as an actual transfer of cash, assets, intellectual property, office subsidy, or payroll support in this inquiry. Donations to Talos and investment in Conjecture must not be counted as donations to ControlAI.</p>\n<h2>1. ControlAI's direct fundraising appeal</h2>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan</a>\nTitle: Preventing extinction from ASI on a $50M yearly budget.\nBy Andrea Miotti, Alex Amadori and Gabriel Alfour; April 20, 2026. Opened/read.</p>\n<p>It estimates $50m/year would give ControlAI a chance at achieving an international ASI prohibition, and discusses $500m-$1bn budgets as possible further expansion. These are requested/hypothetical scales, not actual revenue, realized gifts or approved spending. It invites major philanthropic support and gifts of $100k or more, saying it is not presently set up to accept small donations. It describes itself as a US 501(c)(4) and UK nonprofit that is not a registered charity, and says gifts are not tax deductible.</p>\n<p>Source locations: opening lines 7-15; fundraising section 216-221; media collaboration 199-203. It says 14 creator collaborations included paid and free arrangements. No donor list, donation agreement, board seat for a funder, approval right or binding funding condition was found here. Do not extrapolate the named creator work to every video or every campaign.</p>\n<h2>2. Application, not an award</h2>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f</a>\nOpened/read. Platform-hosted organization and application record; the surrounding organizational summary is edited by grantmaking.ai and includes stale/conflated descriptions, so use the application and status fields narrowly.</p>\n<p>Active application: Scaling ControlAI's parliamentary outreach across the G7 (excl. US), Applied July 13, 2026; $50,000 requested minimum, up to $1,000,000. Organization Grants Received field says no grants recorded, which describes this database, not all real funding. Text says a grant would be earmarked for the program. This is prospective wording, not proof of an executed restricted-grant agreement.</p>\n<p>Minimum proposal: $45,000 for one outreach officer over 6-8 months, plus $5,000 travel/events; expected 20-40 additional legislators briefed. $1m proposal: $800,000 up to eight FTEs, $40,000 events, $25,000 software/materials, $25,000 travel/recruiting, $110,000 operations/contingency, over 12 months. Expected 300-600 additional lawmakers briefed and another 20-plus-signatory cross-party campaign.</p>\n<p>Scope inconsistency: heading and repeated passages exclude the US and include Brussels, but one country-selection sentence includes existing US teams. Keep this unresolved; do not silently harmonize it. Individual project page failed to open.</p>\n<p>Fund's own platform record: <a href=\"https://app.grantmaking.ai/funds/4597b683-2776-4731-8598-627189912dc7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://app.grantmaking.ai/funds/4597b683-2776-4731-8598-627189912dc7</a> . Opened/read Grants Made list; no ControlAI grant shown. No actual award or paid amount established. Site-wide distributed totals are not ControlAI receipts.</p>\n<h2>3. Newly identifiable US entity and 2025 financial lead</h2>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/</a>\nOpened/read 2026-09-05. IRS-derived secondary source, not the original return.</p>\n<p>Entity: Control AI US; EIN 33-3361748; 501(c)(4); Washington, DC; corporation; fiscal year ends December. Personnel names Andrea Miotti, Connor Leahy and Sophie Toura match the campaign organization, and the site identifies controlai.org. No c3 entity identified in this pass.</p>\n<p>Reported FY2025: contributions $136,570; other income $377; total revenue $136,947; expenses $93,682; total assets $69,178. Listed return: Form 990-EZ, fiscal year December2025, received by IRS June23,2026; platform added it August6,2026. These values remain aggregator-reported. Do not use the US entity's limited-year finances as the entire global ControlAI budget or derive donor concentration from them.</p>\n<p>Original return link: <a href=\"https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/view_990/333361748/f9c3cde1c233708dd35572ad3ab7814b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/view_990/333361748/f9c3cde1c233708dd35572ad3ab7814b</a> . Web fetch failed; one direct public GET returned403. No PDF saved. ProPublica entity <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/333361748\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/333361748</a> failed; public API alternative <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/api/v2/organizations/333361748.json\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/api/v2/organizations/333361748.json</a> unavailable to web. Recovery stopped. No original Schedule O, individual donors, related-party transfers, or specific restrictions established.</p>\n<h2>4. Direct donor database searches</h2>\n<p>Targeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred.</p>\n<p>Manifund results included grants to other organizations and creators mentioning ControlAI, e.g. Apart Research's collaboration and independent creator Tom Bibby's references to ControlAI. These were not counted as ControlAI receipts. No indirect route was turned into a direct funding claim.</p>\n<h2>5. Conjecture resources and personnel transition</h2>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective</a>\nConnor Leahy, March26,2026. Opened/read.</p>\n<p>Leahy describes Conjecture's investor-backed founding, technical research, product pivot and failures, and announces joining ControlAI US. He credits an initial investor by first name, Nat, but supplies no new ControlAI donor identity or transfer. This supports a personnel/intellectual trajectory, not a financial merger, assignment of assets or continuing Conjecture-funded payroll.</p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective/comments\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective/comments</a>\nOpened/read. Leahy calls the field money-constrained and solicits people able to mobilize over $100k. A reader asks whether ControlAI sought/rejected OpenPhil funding, but no answer appears. That question is NOT evidence of either an application or rejection. Claims about controlled opposition are Leahy's polemical assessment, not established facts of this investigation. No new funded amount found.</p>\n<p>New corroboration for previous Behrens findings: <a href=\"https://www.talosnetwork.org/perspectives/alumni-newsletter-october-2025\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.talosnetwork.org/perspectives/alumni-newsletter-october-2025</a> . Opened/read, dated October14,2025, author David Conrad. Latest Publications explicitly identifies Behrens as Summer2022 alumna and reports Conjecture/ControlAI coauthorship. This upgrades the earlier indexed-only Talos cohort observation to a read primary publisher source; no fellowship payment or donor earmark follows from it.</p>\n<h2>6. Independence, resources and adjacent coalition lead</h2>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf</a>\nPrimary impact report, December2024-January2026; opened/read, 11pages. Reports team fewer than15 and a small budget, but no exact consolidated financial statement/donor roster. Describes policy/media/creator outreach and measurable engagement; not funding obligations. The pitch and impact report together disclose uses and ambitions much more clearly than actual upstream funders.</p>\n<p>Canadian registration lead: <a href=\"https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=382906\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=382906</a>&amp;regId=976385 . Search-indexed French disclosure says Secure Future Research activities are not controlled/directed by another interested entity in that engagement; opening returned403. Not used as an independently read or universal funding-independence conclusion. Parent access work may establish the precise field and scope.</p>\n<p>Optional coalition lead, with strict limit: <a href=\"https://www.cbpai.org/deal-of-the-century-rome-convening-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https://www.cbpai.org/deal-of-the-century-rome-convening-2026</a> . Opened/read. CBPAI's own archived event page lists ControlAI/AItreaty among coalition organizations and says CBPAI was seed-funded by SFF. This is coalition-side attribution, not a direct ControlAI acknowledgement or a SFF-to-ControlAI grant. It does not establish payment to participants. Archive notice says the Rome event was merged into Washington September15-16,2026; as of this inquiry that event is future, not demonstrated access already achieved. Do not infer attendance from its proposed invitee categories. No expansion into its donor network undertaken.</p>\n<h2>Typed edges</h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Type</th>\n<th>Amount</th>\n<th>Currency/period</th>\n<th>Evidence state and limits</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Unidentified contributors</td>\n<td>Control AI US, EIN33-3361748</td>\n<td>Reported aggregate contributions</td>\n<td>136570</td>\n<td>USD, FY2025</td>\n<td>CauseIQ IRS-derived; original return inaccessible; not individual donors</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>grantmaking.ai launch round</td>\n<td>Application</td>\n<td>50000 to1000000</td>\n<td>USD, applied2026-07-13</td>\n<td>Proposal; neither award nor payment</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Proposed grant</td>\n<td>G7 outreach program</td>\n<td>Prospective earmark/use</td>\n<td>up to1000000</td>\n<td>USD, 6-12month scenarios</td>\n<td>No executed grant agreement; US scope conflict</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prospective major donors</td>\n<td>ControlAI</td>\n<td>Fundraising solicitation</td>\n<td>100000+ individual gifts;50m/year target</td>\n<td>USD, April2026</td>\n<td>Ask/hypothetical budget, not received money</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Connor Leahy</td>\n<td>ControlAI US</td>\n<td>Leadership/personnel transfer</td>\n<td>n/a</td>\n<td>March2026announcement</td>\n<td>Primary self-account, corroborated current team elsewhere</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Conjecture and ControlAI</td>\n<td>Joint policy research</td>\n<td>Collaboration</td>\n<td>undisclosed</td>\n<td>2025</td>\n<td>Coauthorship; no cash/resource valuation</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SFF</td>\n<td>CBPAI</td>\n<td>Claimed seed funding</td>\n<td>undisclosed</td>\n<td>Page preservedApril2026</td>\n<td>CBPAI self-report; NOT ControlAI grant</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ControlAI/AItreaty</td>\n<td>CBPAI</td>\n<td>Claimed coalition participation</td>\n<td>n/a</td>\n<td>Archived eventpage2026</td>\n<td>Coalition-side claim; reciprocal confirmation not inspected</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Unresolved questions that matter</h2>\n<p>Actual ControlAI funder names and amounts; restrictions, reporting terms, termination/clawback or approval rights; any Conjecture cash/assets/payroll supplied to the nonprofit; transfers between Secure Future Research and Control AI US; US original return and related-party explanations; whether the July application was later decided; the application geographic inconsistency. These remain gaps. Neither transparent public strategy nor donor opacity by itself proves donor command or hidden coordination.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up \n Observed 2026-09-05. Bounded public-source inquiry in six groups: direct fundraising disclosures; platform grant records; US nonprofit identity/filing; named grantmaker searches; Conjecture resources/transition; independence and adjacent institutional links. No outreach, private access, paid access or publication. UK accounts already examined by parent were not reopened. \n Result \n This pass found a new US legal-entity/financial lead and a concrete prospective grant application, but did not identify an independently verified donor-to-ControlAI transfer or binding donor conditions. The strongest new distinction is between money the US entity reportedly received in 2025, money requested in a July 2026 application, and the much larger hypothetical budgets advertised in an April fundraising pitch. \n The relationship to Conjecture is well documented through people and collaborative work. It remains unproved as an actual transfer of cash, assets, intellectual property, office subsidy, or payroll support in this inquiry. Donations to Talos and investment in Conjecture must not be counted as donations to ControlAI. \n 1. ControlAI's direct fundraising appeal \n Source:  https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan \nTitle: Preventing extinction from ASI on a $50M yearly budget.\nBy Andrea Miotti, Alex Amadori and Gabriel Alfour; April 20, 2026. Opened/read. \n It estimates $50m/year would give ControlAI a chance at achieving an international ASI prohibition, and discusses $500m-$1bn budgets as possible further expansion. These are requested/hypothetical scales, not actual revenue, realized gifts or approved spending. It invites major philanthropic support and gifts of $100k or more, saying it is not presently set up to accept small donations. It describes itself as a US 501(c)(4) and UK nonprofit that is not a registered charity, and says gifts are not tax deductible. \n Source locations: opening lines 7-15; fundraising section 216-221; media collaboration 199-203. It says 14 creator collaborations included paid and free arrangements. No donor list, donation agreement, board seat for a funder, approval right or binding funding condition was found here. Do not extrapolate the named creator work to every video or every campaign. \n 2. Application, not an award \n Source:  https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f \nOpened/read. Platform-hosted organization and application record; the surrounding organizational summary is edited by grantmaking.ai and includes stale/conflated descriptions, so use the application and status fields narrowly. \n Active application: Scaling ControlAI's parliamentary outreach across the G7 (excl. US), Applied July 13, 2026; $50,000 requested minimum, up to $1,000,000. Organization Grants Received field says no grants recorded, which describes this database, not all real funding. Text says a grant would be earmarked for the program. This is prospective wording, not proof of an executed restricted-grant agreement. \n Minimum proposal: $45,000 for one outreach officer over 6-8 months, plus $5,000 travel/events; expected 20-40 additional legislators briefed. $1m proposal: $800,000 up to eight FTEs, $40,000 events, $25,000 software/materials, $25,000 travel/recruiting, $110,000 operations/contingency, over 12 months. Expected 300-600 additional lawmakers briefed and another 20-plus-signatory cross-party campaign. \n Scope inconsistency: heading and repeated passages exclude the US and include Brussels, but one country-selection sentence includes existing US teams. Keep this unresolved; do not silently harmonize it. Individual project page failed to open. \n Fund's own platform record:  https://app.grantmaking.ai/funds/4597b683-2776-4731-8598-627189912dc7  . Opened/read Grants Made list; no ControlAI grant shown. No actual award or paid amount established. Site-wide distributed totals are not ControlAI receipts. \n 3. Newly identifiable US entity and 2025 financial lead \n Source:  https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/ \nOpened/read 2026-09-05. IRS-derived secondary source, not the original return. \n Entity: Control AI US; EIN 33-3361748; 501(c)(4); Washington, DC; corporation; fiscal year ends December. Personnel names Andrea Miotti, Connor Leahy and Sophie Toura match the campaign organization, and the site identifies controlai.org. No c3 entity identified in this pass. \n Reported FY2025: contributions $136,570; other income $377; total revenue $136,947; expenses $93,682; total assets $69,178. Listed return: Form 990-EZ, fiscal year December2025, received by IRS June23,2026; platform added it August6,2026. These values remain aggregator-reported. Do not use the US entity's limited-year finances as the entire global ControlAI budget or derive donor concentration from them. \n Original return link:  https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/view_990/333361748/f9c3cde1c233708dd35572ad3ab7814b  . Web fetch failed; one direct public GET returned403. No PDF saved. ProPublica entity  https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/333361748  failed; public API alternative  https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/api/v2/organizations/333361748.json  unavailable to web. Recovery stopped. No original Schedule O, individual donors, related-party transfers, or specific restrictions established. \n 4. Direct donor database searches \n Targeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred. \n Manifund results included grants to other organizations and creators mentioning ControlAI, e.g. Apart Research's collaboration and independent creator Tom Bibby's references to ControlAI. These were not counted as ControlAI receipts. No indirect route was turned into a direct funding claim. \n 5. Conjecture resources and personnel transition \n Source:  https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective \nConnor Leahy, March26,2026. Opened/read. \n Leahy describes Conjecture's investor-backed founding, technical research, product pivot and failures, and announces joining ControlAI US. He credits an initial investor by first name, Nat, but supplies no new ControlAI donor identity or transfer. This supports a personnel/intellectual trajectory, not a financial merger, assignment of assets or continuing Conjecture-funded payroll. \n Source:  https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective/comments \nOpened/read. Leahy calls the field money-constrained and solicits people able to mobilize over $100k. A reader asks whether ControlAI sought/rejected OpenPhil funding, but no answer appears. That question is NOT evidence of either an application or rejection. Claims about controlled opposition are Leahy's polemical assessment, not established facts of this investigation. No new funded amount found. \n New corroboration for previous Behrens findings:  https://www.talosnetwork.org/perspectives/alumni-newsletter-october-2025  . Opened/read, dated October14,2025, author David Conrad. Latest Publications explicitly identifies Behrens as Summer2022 alumna and reports Conjecture/ControlAI coauthorship. This upgrades the earlier indexed-only Talos cohort observation to a read primary publisher source; no fellowship payment or donor earmark follows from it. \n 6. Independence, resources and adjacent coalition lead \n Source:  https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf \nPrimary impact report, December2024-January2026; opened/read, 11pages. Reports team fewer than15 and a small budget, but no exact consolidated financial statement/donor roster. Describes policy/media/creator outreach and measurable engagement; not funding obligations. The pitch and impact report together disclose uses and ambitions much more clearly than actual upstream funders. \n Canadian registration lead:  https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=382906 &regId=976385 . Search-indexed French disclosure says Secure Future Research activities are not controlled/directed by another interested entity in that engagement; opening returned403. Not used as an independently read or universal funding-independence conclusion. Parent access work may establish the precise field and scope. \n Optional coalition lead, with strict limit:  https://www.cbpai.org/deal-of-the-century-rome-convening-2026  . Opened/read. CBPAI's own archived event page lists ControlAI/AItreaty among coalition organizations and says CBPAI was seed-funded by SFF. This is coalition-side attribution, not a direct ControlAI acknowledgement or a SFF-to-ControlAI grant. It does not establish payment to participants. Archive notice says the Rome event was merged into Washington September15-16,2026; as of this inquiry that event is future, not demonstrated access already achieved. Do not infer attendance from its proposed invitee categories. No expansion into its donor network undertaken. \n Typed edges \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Type \n Amount \n Currency/period \n Evidence state and limits \n \n \n \n \n Unidentified contributors \n Control AI US, EIN33-3361748 \n Reported aggregate contributions \n 136570 \n USD, FY2025 \n CauseIQ IRS-derived; original return inaccessible; not individual donors \n \n \n ControlAI \n grantmaking.ai launch round \n Application \n 50000 to1000000 \n USD, applied2026-07-13 \n Proposal; neither award nor payment \n \n \n Proposed grant \n G7 outreach program \n Prospective earmark/use \n up to1000000 \n USD, 6-12month scenarios \n No executed grant agreement; US scope conflict \n \n \n Prospective major donors \n ControlAI \n Fundraising solicitation \n 100000+ individual gifts;50m/year target \n USD, April2026 \n Ask/hypothetical budget, not received money \n \n \n Connor Leahy \n ControlAI US \n Leadership/personnel transfer \n n/a \n March2026announcement \n Primary self-account, corroborated current team elsewhere \n \n \n Conjecture and ControlAI \n Joint policy research \n Collaboration \n undisclosed \n 2025 \n Coauthorship; no cash/resource valuation \n \n \n SFF \n CBPAI \n Claimed seed funding \n undisclosed \n Page preservedApril2026 \n CBPAI self-report; NOT ControlAI grant \n \n \n ControlAI/AItreaty \n CBPAI \n Claimed coalition participation \n n/a \n Archived eventpage2026 \n Coalition-side claim; reciprocal confirmation not inspected \n \n \n \n Unresolved questions that matter \n Actual ControlAI funder names and amounts; restrictions, reporting terms, termination/clawback or approval rights; any Conjecture cash/assets/payroll supplied to the nonprofit; transfers between Secure Future Research and Control AI US; US original return and related-party explanations; whether the July application was later decided; the application geographic inconsistency. These remain gaps. Neither transparent public strategy nor donor opacity by itself proves donor command or hidden coordination. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/controlai/controlai-upstream-followup.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# ControlAI upstream funding and resource follow-up\n\nObserved 2026-09-05. Bounded public-source inquiry in six groups: direct fundraising disclosures; platform grant records; US nonprofit identity/filing; named grantmaker searches; Conjecture resources/transition; independence and adjacent institutional links. No outreach, private access, paid access or publication. UK accounts already examined by parent were not reopened.\n\n## Result\n\nThis pass found a new US legal-entity/financial lead and a concrete prospective grant application, but did not identify an independently verified donor-to-ControlAI transfer or binding donor conditions. The strongest new distinction is between money the US entity reportedly received in 2025, money requested in a July 2026 application, and the much larger hypothetical budgets advertised in an April fundraising pitch.\n\nThe relationship to Conjecture is well documented through people and collaborative work. It remains unproved as an actual transfer of cash, assets, intellectual property, office subsidy, or payroll support in this inquiry. Donations to Talos and investment in Conjecture must not be counted as donations to ControlAI.\n\n## 1. ControlAI's direct fundraising appeal\n\nSource: https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan\nTitle: Preventing extinction from ASI on a $50M yearly budget.\nBy Andrea Miotti, Alex Amadori and Gabriel Alfour; April 20, 2026. Opened/read.\n\nIt estimates $50m/year would give ControlAI a chance at achieving an international ASI prohibition, and discusses $500m-$1bn budgets as possible further expansion. These are requested/hypothetical scales, not actual revenue, realized gifts or approved spending. It invites major philanthropic support and gifts of $100k or more, saying it is not presently set up to accept small donations. It describes itself as a US 501(c)(4) and UK nonprofit that is not a registered charity, and says gifts are not tax deductible.\n\nSource locations: opening lines 7-15; fundraising section 216-221; media collaboration 199-203. It says 14 creator collaborations included paid and free arrangements. No donor list, donation agreement, board seat for a funder, approval right or binding funding condition was found here. Do not extrapolate the named creator work to every video or every campaign.\n\n## 2. Application, not an award\n\nSource: https://app.grantmaking.ai/orgs/f723327d-43a4-4e02-ae12-5f68bb6f086f\nOpened/read. Platform-hosted organization and application record; the surrounding organizational summary is edited by grantmaking.ai and includes stale/conflated descriptions, so use the application and status fields narrowly.\n\nActive application: Scaling ControlAI's parliamentary outreach across the G7 (excl. US), Applied July 13, 2026; $50,000 requested minimum, up to $1,000,000. Organization Grants Received field says no grants recorded, which describes this database, not all real funding. Text says a grant would be earmarked for the program. This is prospective wording, not proof of an executed restricted-grant agreement.\n\nMinimum proposal: $45,000 for one outreach officer over 6-8 months, plus $5,000 travel/events; expected 20-40 additional legislators briefed. $1m proposal: $800,000 up to eight FTEs, $40,000 events, $25,000 software/materials, $25,000 travel/recruiting, $110,000 operations/contingency, over 12 months. Expected 300-600 additional lawmakers briefed and another 20-plus-signatory cross-party campaign.\n\nScope inconsistency: heading and repeated passages exclude the US and include Brussels, but one country-selection sentence includes existing US teams. Keep this unresolved; do not silently harmonize it. Individual project page failed to open.\n\nFund's own platform record: https://app.grantmaking.ai/funds/4597b683-2776-4731-8598-627189912dc7 . Opened/read Grants Made list; no ControlAI grant shown. No actual award or paid amount established. Site-wide distributed totals are not ControlAI receipts.\n\n## 3. Newly identifiable US entity and 2025 financial lead\n\nSource: https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/control-ai-us,333361748/\nOpened/read 2026-09-05. IRS-derived secondary source, not the original return.\n\nEntity: Control AI US; EIN 33-3361748; 501(c)(4); Washington, DC; corporation; fiscal year ends December. Personnel names Andrea Miotti, Connor Leahy and Sophie Toura match the campaign organization, and the site identifies controlai.org. No c3 entity identified in this pass.\n\nReported FY2025: contributions $136,570; other income $377; total revenue $136,947; expenses $93,682; total assets $69,178. Listed return: Form 990-EZ, fiscal year December2025, received by IRS June23,2026; platform added it August6,2026. These values remain aggregator-reported. Do not use the US entity's limited-year finances as the entire global ControlAI budget or derive donor concentration from them.\n\nOriginal return link: https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/view_990/333361748/f9c3cde1c233708dd35572ad3ab7814b . Web fetch failed; one direct public GET returned403. No PDF saved. ProPublica entity https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/333361748 failed; public API alternative https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/api/v2/organizations/333361748.json unavailable to web. Recovery stopped. No original Schedule O, individual donors, related-party transfers, or specific restrictions established.\n\n## 4. Direct donor database searches\n\nTargeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred.\n\nManifund results included grants to other organizations and creators mentioning ControlAI, e.g. Apart Research's collaboration and independent creator Tom Bibby's references to ControlAI. These were not counted as ControlAI receipts. No indirect route was turned into a direct funding claim.\n\n## 5. Conjecture resources and personnel transition\n\nSource: https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective\nConnor Leahy, March26,2026. Opened/read.\n\nLeahy describes Conjecture's investor-backed founding, technical research, product pivot and failures, and announces joining ControlAI US. He credits an initial investor by first name, Nat, but supplies no new ControlAI donor identity or transfer. This supports a personnel/intellectual trajectory, not a financial merger, assignment of assets or continuing Conjecture-funded payroll.\n\nSource: https://www.ettf.land/p/conjecture-a-retrospective/comments\nOpened/read. Leahy calls the field money-constrained and solicits people able to mobilize over $100k. A reader asks whether ControlAI sought/rejected OpenPhil funding, but no answer appears. That question is NOT evidence of either an application or rejection. Claims about controlled opposition are Leahy's polemical assessment, not established facts of this investigation. No new funded amount found.\n\nNew corroboration for previous Behrens findings: https://www.talosnetwork.org/perspectives/alumni-newsletter-october-2025 . Opened/read, dated October14,2025, author David Conrad. Latest Publications explicitly identifies Behrens as Summer2022 alumna and reports Conjecture/ControlAI coauthorship. This upgrades the earlier indexed-only Talos cohort observation to a read primary publisher source; no fellowship payment or donor earmark follows from it.\n\n## 6. Independence, resources and adjacent coalition lead\n\nSource: https://controlai.b-cdn.net/2025-controlai-impact-report-v2.pdf\nPrimary impact report, December2024-January2026; opened/read, 11pages. Reports team fewer than15 and a small budget, but no exact consolidated financial statement/donor roster. Describes policy/media/creator outreach and measurable engagement; not funding obligations. The pitch and impact report together disclose uses and ambitions much more clearly than actual upstream funders.\n\nCanadian registration lead: https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=382906&regId=976385 . Search-indexed French disclosure says Secure Future Research activities are not controlled/directed by another interested entity in that engagement; opening returned403. Not used as an independently read or universal funding-independence conclusion. Parent access work may establish the precise field and scope.\n\nOptional coalition lead, with strict limit: https://www.cbpai.org/deal-of-the-century-rome-convening-2026 . Opened/read. CBPAI's own archived event page lists ControlAI/AItreaty among coalition organizations and says CBPAI was seed-funded by SFF. This is coalition-side attribution, not a direct ControlAI acknowledgement or a SFF-to-ControlAI grant. It does not establish payment to participants. Archive notice says the Rome event was merged into Washington September15-16,2026; as of this inquiry that event is future, not demonstrated access already achieved. Do not infer attendance from its proposed invitee categories. No expansion into its donor network undertaken.\n\n## Typed edges\n\n| From | To | Type | Amount | Currency/period | Evidence state and limits |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Unidentified contributors | Control AI US, EIN33-3361748 | Reported aggregate contributions | 136570 | USD, FY2025 | CauseIQ IRS-derived; original return inaccessible; not individual donors |\n| ControlAI | grantmaking.ai launch round | Application | 50000 to1000000 | USD, applied2026-07-13 | Proposal; neither award nor payment |\n| Proposed grant | G7 outreach program | Prospective earmark/use | up to1000000 | USD, 6-12month scenarios | No executed grant agreement; US scope conflict |\n| Prospective major donors | ControlAI | Fundraising solicitation | 100000+ individual gifts;50m/year target | USD, April2026 | Ask/hypothetical budget, not received money |\n| Connor Leahy | ControlAI US | Leadership/personnel transfer | n/a | March2026announcement | Primary self-account, corroborated current team elsewhere |\n| Conjecture and ControlAI | Joint policy research | Collaboration | undisclosed | 2025 | Coauthorship; no cash/resource valuation |\n| SFF | CBPAI | Claimed seed funding | undisclosed | Page preservedApril2026 | CBPAI self-report; NOT ControlAI grant |\n| ControlAI/AItreaty | CBPAI | Claimed coalition participation | n/a | Archived eventpage2026 | Coalition-side claim; reciprocal confirmation not inspected |\n\n## Unresolved questions that matter\n\nActual ControlAI funder names and amounts; restrictions, reporting terms, termination/clawback or approval rights; any Conjecture cash/assets/payroll supplied to the nonprofit; transfers between Secure Future Research and Control AI US; US original return and related-party explanations; whether the July application was later decided; the application geographic inconsistency. These remain gaps. Neither transparent public strategy nor donor opacity by itself proves donor command or hidden coordination."
      },
      {
        "id": "profile-workstreams-netid-collective-shout-bridges",
        "title": "Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges",
        "description": "Earlier public-source research from 5 September 2026, recovered for the subject profiles. Read alongside the later findings.",
        "html": "<h1>Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges</h1>\n<p>Research cutoff and reading date: 5 September 2026. Public-source, bounded follow-up to the supplied post and two local dossiers. This note distinguishes campaign participation, commercial effects, advisory access and control. No outreach or edits to originals.</p>\n<h2>Assessment</h2>\n<p>There is a documented mechanism linking Collective Shout's campaigning to payment-provider pressure and restrictions by itch.io. There is also a documented personnel bridge into the stakeholder advisory board of Australia's government-commissioned age-assurance technology trial. These are separate, supported influence channels. The evidence does not establish that the payment campaign secured the advisory appointment, that the advisory board exercised regulatory power, or that an AI NGO directed either channel.</p>\n<p>The supplied post's Basic Religious Charity explanation is materially unreliable: Collective Shout's official company/DGR particulars conflict with the ACNC's published eligibility rules. Its claimed Public Benevolent Institution and advancing-religion subtypes were not independently established here. Do not use the asserted BRC exemption as evidence of financial secrecy or a deliberately engineered legal structure.</p>\n<p>The strongest specific cross-network bridge is Collective Shout's joint payment letter with NCOSE. Separately, NCOSE and the Future of Life Institute signed a broad US AI-policy coalition letter. This supports two documented campaign overlaps, not a direct Collective Shout–FLI partnership, shared funding or common direction.</p>\n<h2>1. Charity classification: correction to the supplied material</h2>\n<p>The official ABR identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED, ABN 30 162 159 097 / ACN 162 159 097, as an Australian Public Company, with charity registration from 31 January 2013 and entity-level DGR endorsement from 1 January 2024. The page's record-extraction date is 17 August 2026. DGR status by itself does not establish PBI status. <a href=\"https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/30162159097\">ABR record</a>, read.</p>\n<p>ACNC guidance excludes Corporations Act companies, whole-entity DGRs, and charities registered or eligible for an additional subtype from Basic Religious Charity status. Only qualifying advancing-religion charities receive BRC financial-reporting exemptions; they still file an Annual Information Statement. Applying those published rules to the ABR particulars contradicts the claimed exemption. This is an evidence-based inference, not a separately obtained regulatory ruling. <a href=\"https://www.acnc.gov.au/manage-my-charity-type/basic-religious-charities\">ACNC BRC criteria</a>, read.</p>\n<p>The actual <a href=\"https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/8f14b7df-39af-e811-a963-000d3ad24077/profile\">ACNC charity profile</a> and the dossier's cited <a href=\"https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/8f14b7df-39af-e811-a963-000d3ad24077/documents/75da6b81-2282-ec11-8d20-002248929301\">2021 Annual Information Statement</a> returned a JavaScript shell, so their substantive fields were not read. A browser security-policy check denied rendered access; that boundary was respected. Consequently the PBI/advancing-religion fields remain unverified. The legal-eligibility contradiction is sufficient to withhold the dossier's BRC conclusion.</p>\n<h2>2. Payment pressure and a documented platform response</h2>\n<p>Collective Shout's open letter is dated 10 July 2025 and posted 11 July. It asks PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership to stop processing transactions for Steam, itch.io and comparable platforms hosting the content it criticises. Signatories include Melinda Tankard Reist for Collective Shout; Haley McNamara, then NCOSE's Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Programs; and Professor Jon Rouse. These are public campaign endorsements, with no financial transfer or authority relationship stated. <a href=\"https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors\">Original letter</a>, read, including signatory list. The site's footer describes Collective Shout as a company limited by guarantee; its self-description is not substituted for the official registry.</p>\n<p>On 24 July 2025 itch.io said it had deindexed all adult NSFW content after processor scrutiny associated with Collective Shout's campaign. It described protecting payment access as operationally essential. Its 28 July addendum names Stripe and PayPal as current processors, explains why the platform's response was broad, and discusses stricter age-gating. This is a primary account by the affected platform, although the underlying processor communications were not obtained. <a href=\"https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content\">itch.io announcement and addendum</a>, read.</p>\n<p>Mastercard's 1 August 2025 statement denies evaluating games or requiring restrictions on game platforms, and says its network permits lawful purchases while requiring merchant controls against unlawful transactions. This limits attribution: pressure on payment intermediaries and a platform's compliance response are established; a specific direct Mastercard takedown instruction is disputed and unproved here. <a href=\"https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html\">Mastercard statement</a>, read. No separate Steam internal decision record was reviewed.</p>\n<h2>3. Advisory access: identify who appointed whom</h2>\n<p>The Australian department announced on 15 November 2024 that an ACCS-led consortium had won the age-assurance trial tender. Its stated purpose included testing alternatives and informing future policy. <a href=\"https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial\">Departmental tender announcement</a>, read.</p>\n<p>The trial's own stakeholder-board page lists Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director. It says Professor Jon Rouse chairs the board and appointed its members. Rouse is also a signatory to the July payment letter above. This is a concrete overlap between campaign cooperation and the trial's appointment channel. The page also lists industry and digital-rights participants; the board cannot fairly be represented as solely Collective Shout's vehicle. <a href=\"https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/\">Trial board roster and appointment description</a>, read; <a href=\"https://ageassurance.com.au/people/melinda-tankard-reist/\">individual trial biography</a>, read.</p>\n<p>Precise label: stakeholder adviser to a government-commissioned trial run by an independent contractor. The reviewed sources do not make her a government regulator, establish ministerial appointment, or give her power over mandatory identity infrastructure. The department published the completed trial report on 31 August 2025. The still-live roster does not by itself establish an ongoing appointment in September 2026. <a href=\"https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report\">Departmental final-report page</a>, read; report volumes not read in this branch.</p>\n<h2>4. NCOSE and the limited bridge to FLI</h2>\n<p>The July payment letter directly establishes Collective Shout–NCOSE cooperation on that campaign. A separate letter dated 30 June 2025 opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation lists both Future of Life Institute and National Center on Sexual Exploitation among more than 140 organisations. See purpose on page 1 and both names on page 4. <a href=\"https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf\">Coalition letter, host Common Sense Media</a>, text and relevant names read; PDF screenshot fetch failed.</p>\n<p>Interpretation: NCOSE connects these two public advocacy episodes. The broad letter establishes a shared policy position and joint advocacy act. It supplies no evidence that FLI funded Collective Shout, directed its payment campaign, or participated in its Australian advisory appointment. No direct Collective Shout relationship with CAIS, ControlAI or the named Ban Deepfakes campaign was established in this bounded search. Non-discovery is not proof of absence. Collective Shout advocating restrictions on deepfakes is not, by itself, membership in that particular campaign.</p>\n<h2>Compact typed edges</h2>\n<p>Amounts are not established for any edge below. Sources above contain exact URLs.</p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>From</th>\n<th>To</th>\n<th>Edge type and period</th>\n<th>Evidence status / limit</th>\n</tr>\n</thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Collective Shout / Tankard Reist</td>\n<td>Payment-company leadership</td>\n<td>Public request to cease processing; 10–11 July 2025</td>\n<td>Original letter; request, not an instruction with legal force</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NCOSE / Haley McNamara</td>\n<td>Collective Shout payment campaign</td>\n<td>Co-signatory; July 2025</td>\n<td>Named endorsement; no funding or direction shown</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Jon Rouse</td>\n<td>Collective Shout payment campaign</td>\n<td>Co-signatory; July 2025</td>\n<td>Named endorsement; personal professional identification</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Collective Shout campaign</td>\n<td>itch.io processor scrutiny / content deindexing</td>\n<td>Contributory causal attribution; 24 July 2025</td>\n<td>itch.io's primary account; private processor correspondence unreviewed</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Australian department</td>\n<td>ACCS-led consortium</td>\n<td>Trial procurement; 15 November 2024</td>\n<td>Official tender announcement; no contract amount extracted</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Jon Rouse</td>\n<td>Trial stakeholder board members</td>\n<td>Chair / appointment function; 2024–25 trial</td>\n<td>Operator's published description; exact individual appointment dates absent</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tankard Reist / Collective Shout</td>\n<td>Trial stakeholder board</td>\n<td>Listed advisory membership; 2024–25 trial</td>\n<td>Live roster; no ongoing 2026 mandate or regulatory powers established</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NCOSE and FLI</td>\n<td>US anti-AI-moratorium letter</td>\n<td>Shared signatories; 30 June 2025</td>\n<td>Broad public coalition; does not imply general alliance or control</td>\n</tr>\n</tbody>\n</table>\n<h2>Supplied-source custody and unresolved questions</h2>\n<p>The supplied post was read in full. Relevant paragraphs and citation targets were extracted without modification from the two DOCX files using Python standard-library ZIP/XML parsing. The first dossier cites the 2021 AIS for its BRC assertion, then turns the apparent contradiction with company status into an inference of deliberate legal engineering. This branch found no primary support for that inference. The second dossier includes an official-host 2022 audited-financial-statement URL; that report was not read, so its title alone is not financial evidence.</p>\n<p>Inputs: <code>C:/Users/user/.codex/attachments/cafa3577-91f7-4d79-99d8-46ed9ca8c4f3/pasted-text.txt</code>; <code>E:/Indranet/Research/Research Reports/Unsorted/The Architecture of a Moral Crusade_ An Influence Dossier on Collective Shout.docx</code>; <code>E:/Indranet/Research/Research Reports/Unsorted/Influence and Identity Dossier_ Melinda Tankard Reist.docx</code>.</p>\n<p>Highest-value remaining records would be the actual ACNC subtype/AIS fields, dated trial appointment terms and meeting minutes showing recommendations adopted, and the payment processors' contemporaneous instructions. Those could establish classification, policy conversion and the private enforcement chain. The reviewed connections alone do not establish a common directing authority. This note does not evaluate the supplied post's broader geopolitical model.</p>\n",
        "searchText": " Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges \n Research cutoff and reading date: 5 September 2026. Public-source, bounded follow-up to the supplied post and two local dossiers. This note distinguishes campaign participation, commercial effects, advisory access and control. No outreach or edits to originals. \n Assessment \n There is a documented mechanism linking Collective Shout's campaigning to payment-provider pressure and restrictions by itch.io. There is also a documented personnel bridge into the stakeholder advisory board of Australia's government-commissioned age-assurance technology trial. These are separate, supported influence channels. The evidence does not establish that the payment campaign secured the advisory appointment, that the advisory board exercised regulatory power, or that an AI NGO directed either channel. \n The supplied post's Basic Religious Charity explanation is materially unreliable: Collective Shout's official company/DGR particulars conflict with the ACNC's published eligibility rules. Its claimed Public Benevolent Institution and advancing-religion subtypes were not independently established here. Do not use the asserted BRC exemption as evidence of financial secrecy or a deliberately engineered legal structure. \n The strongest specific cross-network bridge is Collective Shout's joint payment letter with NCOSE. Separately, NCOSE and the Future of Life Institute signed a broad US AI-policy coalition letter. This supports two documented campaign overlaps, not a direct Collective Shout–FLI partnership, shared funding or common direction. \n 1. Charity classification: correction to the supplied material \n The official ABR identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED, ABN 30 162 159 097 / ACN 162 159 097, as an Australian Public Company, with charity registration from 31 January 2013 and entity-level DGR endorsement from 1 January 2024. The page's record-extraction date is 17 August 2026. DGR status by itself does not establish PBI status.  ABR record , read. \n ACNC guidance excludes Corporations Act companies, whole-entity DGRs, and charities registered or eligible for an additional subtype from Basic Religious Charity status. Only qualifying advancing-religion charities receive BRC financial-reporting exemptions; they still file an Annual Information Statement. Applying those published rules to the ABR particulars contradicts the claimed exemption. This is an evidence-based inference, not a separately obtained regulatory ruling.  ACNC BRC criteria , read. \n The actual  ACNC charity profile  and the dossier's cited  2021 Annual Information Statement  returned a JavaScript shell, so their substantive fields were not read. A browser security-policy check denied rendered access; that boundary was respected. Consequently the PBI/advancing-religion fields remain unverified. The legal-eligibility contradiction is sufficient to withhold the dossier's BRC conclusion. \n 2. Payment pressure and a documented platform response \n Collective Shout's open letter is dated 10 July 2025 and posted 11 July. It asks PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership to stop processing transactions for Steam, itch.io and comparable platforms hosting the content it criticises. Signatories include Melinda Tankard Reist for Collective Shout; Haley McNamara, then NCOSE's Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Programs; and Professor Jon Rouse. These are public campaign endorsements, with no financial transfer or authority relationship stated.  Original letter , read, including signatory list. The site's footer describes Collective Shout as a company limited by guarantee; its self-description is not substituted for the official registry. \n On 24 July 2025 itch.io said it had deindexed all adult NSFW content after processor scrutiny associated with Collective Shout's campaign. It described protecting payment access as operationally essential. Its 28 July addendum names Stripe and PayPal as current processors, explains why the platform's response was broad, and discusses stricter age-gating. This is a primary account by the affected platform, although the underlying processor communications were not obtained.  itch.io announcement and addendum , read. \n Mastercard's 1 August 2025 statement denies evaluating games or requiring restrictions on game platforms, and says its network permits lawful purchases while requiring merchant controls against unlawful transactions. This limits attribution: pressure on payment intermediaries and a platform's compliance response are established; a specific direct Mastercard takedown instruction is disputed and unproved here.  Mastercard statement , read. No separate Steam internal decision record was reviewed. \n 3. Advisory access: identify who appointed whom \n The Australian department announced on 15 November 2024 that an ACCS-led consortium had won the age-assurance trial tender. Its stated purpose included testing alternatives and informing future policy.  Departmental tender announcement , read. \n The trial's own stakeholder-board page lists Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director. It says Professor Jon Rouse chairs the board and appointed its members. Rouse is also a signatory to the July payment letter above. This is a concrete overlap between campaign cooperation and the trial's appointment channel. The page also lists industry and digital-rights participants; the board cannot fairly be represented as solely Collective Shout's vehicle.  Trial board roster and appointment description , read;  individual trial biography , read. \n Precise label: stakeholder adviser to a government-commissioned trial run by an independent contractor. The reviewed sources do not make her a government regulator, establish ministerial appointment, or give her power over mandatory identity infrastructure. The department published the completed trial report on 31 August 2025. The still-live roster does not by itself establish an ongoing appointment in September 2026.  Departmental final-report page , read; report volumes not read in this branch. \n 4. NCOSE and the limited bridge to FLI \n The July payment letter directly establishes Collective Shout–NCOSE cooperation on that campaign. A separate letter dated 30 June 2025 opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation lists both Future of Life Institute and National Center on Sexual Exploitation among more than 140 organisations. See purpose on page 1 and both names on page 4.  Coalition letter, host Common Sense Media , text and relevant names read; PDF screenshot fetch failed. \n Interpretation: NCOSE connects these two public advocacy episodes. The broad letter establishes a shared policy position and joint advocacy act. It supplies no evidence that FLI funded Collective Shout, directed its payment campaign, or participated in its Australian advisory appointment. No direct Collective Shout relationship with CAIS, ControlAI or the named Ban Deepfakes campaign was established in this bounded search. Non-discovery is not proof of absence. Collective Shout advocating restrictions on deepfakes is not, by itself, membership in that particular campaign. \n Compact typed edges \n Amounts are not established for any edge below. Sources above contain exact URLs. \n \n \n \n From \n To \n Edge type and period \n Evidence status / limit \n \n \n \n \n Collective Shout / Tankard Reist \n Payment-company leadership \n Public request to cease processing; 10–11 July 2025 \n Original letter; request, not an instruction with legal force \n \n \n NCOSE / Haley McNamara \n Collective Shout payment campaign \n Co-signatory; July 2025 \n Named endorsement; no funding or direction shown \n \n \n Jon Rouse \n Collective Shout payment campaign \n Co-signatory; July 2025 \n Named endorsement; personal professional identification \n \n \n Collective Shout campaign \n itch.io processor scrutiny / content deindexing \n Contributory causal attribution; 24 July 2025 \n itch.io's primary account; private processor correspondence unreviewed \n \n \n Australian department \n ACCS-led consortium \n Trial procurement; 15 November 2024 \n Official tender announcement; no contract amount extracted \n \n \n Jon Rouse \n Trial stakeholder board members \n Chair / appointment function; 2024–25 trial \n Operator's published description; exact individual appointment dates absent \n \n \n Tankard Reist / Collective Shout \n Trial stakeholder board \n Listed advisory membership; 2024–25 trial \n Live roster; no ongoing 2026 mandate or regulatory powers established \n \n \n NCOSE and FLI \n US anti-AI-moratorium letter \n Shared signatories; 30 June 2025 \n Broad public coalition; does not imply general alliance or control \n \n \n \n Supplied-source custody and unresolved questions \n The supplied post was read in full. Relevant paragraphs and citation targets were extracted without modification from the two DOCX files using Python standard-library ZIP/XML parsing. The first dossier cites the 2021 AIS for its BRC assertion, then turns the apparent contradiction with company status into an inference of deliberate legal engineering. This branch found no primary support for that inference. The second dossier includes an official-host 2022 audited-financial-statement URL; that report was not read, so its title alone is not financial evidence. \n Inputs:  C:/Users/user/.codex/attachments/cafa3577-91f7-4d79-99d8-46ed9ca8c4f3/pasted-text.txt ;  E:/Indranet/Research/Research Reports/Unsorted/The Architecture of a Moral Crusade_ An Influence Dossier on Collective Shout.docx ;  E:/Indranet/Research/Research Reports/Unsorted/Influence and Identity Dossier_ Melinda Tankard Reist.docx . \n Highest-value remaining records would be the actual ACNC subtype/AIS fields, dated trial appointment terms and meeting minutes showing recommendations adopted, and the payment processors' contemporaneous instructions. Those could establish classification, policy conversion and the private enforcement chain. The reviewed connections alone do not establish a common directing authority. This note does not evaluate the supplied post's broader geopolitical model. \n",
        "path": "workstreams/netid/collective-shout-bridges.md",
        "sourceIds": [],
        "markdown": "# Collective Shout: payment pressure, advisory access and AI-network bridges\n\nResearch cutoff and reading date: 5 September 2026. Public-source, bounded follow-up to the supplied post and two local dossiers. This note distinguishes campaign participation, commercial effects, advisory access and control. No outreach or edits to originals.\n\n## Assessment\n\nThere is a documented mechanism linking Collective Shout's campaigning to payment-provider pressure and restrictions by itch.io. There is also a documented personnel bridge into the stakeholder advisory board of Australia's government-commissioned age-assurance technology trial. These are separate, supported influence channels. The evidence does not establish that the payment campaign secured the advisory appointment, that the advisory board exercised regulatory power, or that an AI NGO directed either channel.\n\nThe supplied post's Basic Religious Charity explanation is materially unreliable: Collective Shout's official company/DGR particulars conflict with the ACNC's published eligibility rules. Its claimed Public Benevolent Institution and advancing-religion subtypes were not independently established here. Do not use the asserted BRC exemption as evidence of financial secrecy or a deliberately engineered legal structure.\n\nThe strongest specific cross-network bridge is Collective Shout's joint payment letter with NCOSE. Separately, NCOSE and the Future of Life Institute signed a broad US AI-policy coalition letter. This supports two documented campaign overlaps, not a direct Collective Shout–FLI partnership, shared funding or common direction.\n\n## 1. Charity classification: correction to the supplied material\n\nThe official ABR identifies COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED, ABN 30 162 159 097 / ACN 162 159 097, as an Australian Public Company, with charity registration from 31 January 2013 and entity-level DGR endorsement from 1 January 2024. The page's record-extraction date is 17 August 2026. DGR status by itself does not establish PBI status. [ABR record](https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View/30162159097), read.\n\nACNC guidance excludes Corporations Act companies, whole-entity DGRs, and charities registered or eligible for an additional subtype from Basic Religious Charity status. Only qualifying advancing-religion charities receive BRC financial-reporting exemptions; they still file an Annual Information Statement. Applying those published rules to the ABR particulars contradicts the claimed exemption. This is an evidence-based inference, not a separately obtained regulatory ruling. [ACNC BRC criteria](https://www.acnc.gov.au/manage-my-charity-type/basic-religious-charities), read.\n\nThe actual [ACNC charity profile](https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/8f14b7df-39af-e811-a963-000d3ad24077/profile) and the dossier's cited [2021 Annual Information Statement](https://www.acnc.gov.au/charity/charities/8f14b7df-39af-e811-a963-000d3ad24077/documents/75da6b81-2282-ec11-8d20-002248929301) returned a JavaScript shell, so their substantive fields were not read. A browser security-policy check denied rendered access; that boundary was respected. Consequently the PBI/advancing-religion fields remain unverified. The legal-eligibility contradiction is sufficient to withhold the dossier's BRC conclusion.\n\n## 2. Payment pressure and a documented platform response\n\nCollective Shout's open letter is dated 10 July 2025 and posted 11 July. It asks PayPal, Mastercard, Visa, Paysafe and Discover leadership to stop processing transactions for Steam, itch.io and comparable platforms hosting the content it criticises. Signatories include Melinda Tankard Reist for Collective Shout; Haley McNamara, then NCOSE's Senior Vice President of Strategic Initiatives and Programs; and Professor Jon Rouse. These are public campaign endorsements, with no financial transfer or authority relationship stated. [Original letter](https://www.collectiveshout.org/open-letter-to-payment-processors), read, including signatory list. The site's footer describes Collective Shout as a company limited by guarantee; its self-description is not substituted for the official registry.\n\nOn 24 July 2025 itch.io said it had deindexed all adult NSFW content after processor scrutiny associated with Collective Shout's campaign. It described protecting payment access as operationally essential. Its 28 July addendum names Stripe and PayPal as current processors, explains why the platform's response was broad, and discusses stricter age-gating. This is a primary account by the affected platform, although the underlying processor communications were not obtained. [itch.io announcement and addendum](https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content), read.\n\nMastercard's 1 August 2025 statement denies evaluating games or requiring restrictions on game platforms, and says its network permits lawful purchases while requiring merchant controls against unlawful transactions. This limits attribution: pressure on payment intermediaries and a platform's compliance response are established; a specific direct Mastercard takedown instruction is disputed and unproved here. [Mastercard statement](https://www.mastercard.com/us/en/news-and-trends/press/2025/august/clarifying-recent-headlines-on-gaming-content.html), read. No separate Steam internal decision record was reviewed.\n\n## 3. Advisory access: identify who appointed whom\n\nThe Australian department announced on 15 November 2024 that an ACCS-led consortium had won the age-assurance trial tender. Its stated purpose included testing alternatives and informing future policy. [Departmental tender announcement](https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/tender-awarded-age-assurance-trial), read.\n\nThe trial's own stakeholder-board page lists Tankard Reist as Collective Shout's Movement Director. It says Professor Jon Rouse chairs the board and appointed its members. Rouse is also a signatory to the July payment letter above. This is a concrete overlap between campaign cooperation and the trial's appointment channel. The page also lists industry and digital-rights participants; the board cannot fairly be represented as solely Collective Shout's vehicle. [Trial board roster and appointment description](https://ageassurance.com.au/stakeholder-advisory-board/), read; [individual trial biography](https://ageassurance.com.au/people/melinda-tankard-reist/), read.\n\nPrecise label: stakeholder adviser to a government-commissioned trial run by an independent contractor. The reviewed sources do not make her a government regulator, establish ministerial appointment, or give her power over mandatory identity infrastructure. The department published the completed trial report on 31 August 2025. The still-live roster does not by itself establish an ongoing appointment in September 2026. [Departmental final-report page](https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/age-assurance-technology-trial-final-report), read; report volumes not read in this branch.\n\n## 4. NCOSE and the limited bridge to FLI\n\nThe July payment letter directly establishes Collective Shout–NCOSE cooperation on that campaign. A separate letter dated 30 June 2025 opposing the federal moratorium on state AI regulation lists both Future of Life Institute and National Center on Sexual Exploitation among more than 140 organisations. See purpose on page 1 and both names on page 4. [Coalition letter, host Common Sense Media](https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/coalition-letter_oppose-the-updated-ai-moratorium-updated-6.30.25-5pm.pdf), text and relevant names read; PDF screenshot fetch failed.\n\nInterpretation: NCOSE connects these two public advocacy episodes. The broad letter establishes a shared policy position and joint advocacy act. It supplies no evidence that FLI funded Collective Shout, directed its payment campaign, or participated in its Australian advisory appointment. No direct Collective Shout relationship with CAIS, ControlAI or the named Ban Deepfakes campaign was established in this bounded search. Non-discovery is not proof of absence. Collective Shout advocating restrictions on deepfakes is not, by itself, membership in that particular campaign.\n\n## Compact typed edges\n\nAmounts are not established for any edge below. Sources above contain exact URLs.\n\n| From | To | Edge type and period | Evidence status / limit |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Collective Shout / Tankard Reist | Payment-company leadership | Public request to cease processing; 10–11 July 2025 | Original letter; request, not an instruction with legal force |\n| NCOSE / Haley McNamara | Collective Shout payment campaign | Co-signatory; July 2025 | Named endorsement; no funding or direction shown |\n| Jon Rouse | Collective Shout payment campaign | Co-signatory; July 2025 | Named endorsement; personal professional identification |\n| Collective Shout campaign | itch.io processor scrutiny / content deindexing | Contributory causal attribution; 24 July 2025 | itch.io's primary account; private processor correspondence unreviewed |\n| Australian department | ACCS-led consortium | Trial procurement; 15 November 2024 | Official tender announcement; no contract amount extracted |\n| Jon Rouse | Trial stakeholder board members | Chair / appointment function; 2024–25 trial | Operator's published description; exact individual appointment dates absent |\n| Tankard Reist / Collective Shout | Trial stakeholder board | Listed advisory membership; 2024–25 trial | Live roster; no ongoing 2026 mandate or regulatory powers established |\n| NCOSE and FLI | US anti-AI-moratorium letter | Shared signatories; 30 June 2025 | Broad public coalition; does not imply general alliance or control |\n\n## Supplied-source custody and unresolved questions\n\nThe supplied post was read in full. Relevant paragraphs and citation targets were extracted without modification from the two DOCX files using Python standard-library ZIP/XML parsing. The first dossier cites the 2021 AIS for its BRC assertion, then turns the apparent contradiction with company status into an inference of deliberate legal engineering. This branch found no primary support for that inference. The second dossier includes an official-host 2022 audited-financial-statement URL; that report was not read, so its title alone is not financial evidence.\n\nInputs: `C:/Users/user/.codex/attachments/cafa3577-91f7-4d79-99d8-46ed9ca8c4f3/pasted-text.txt`; `E:/Indranet/Research/Research Reports/Unsorted/The Architecture of a Moral Crusade_ An Influence Dossier on Collective Shout.docx`; `E:/Indranet/Research/Research Reports/Unsorted/Influence and Identity Dossier_ Melinda Tankard Reist.docx`.\n\nHighest-value remaining records would be the actual ACNC subtype/AIS fields, dated trial appointment terms and meeting minutes showing recommendations adopted, and the payment processors' contemporaneous instructions. Those could establish classification, policy conversion and the private enforcement chain. The reviewed connections alone do not establish a common directing authority. This note does not evaluate the supplied post's broader geopolitical model."
      }
    ],
    "waveNotes": [
      {
        "id": "w34-sanders-findings",
        "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition",
        "description": "ControlAI consultation, expert access, advocacy incentives, political allies and the limits of the campaign-finance trail.",
        "searchText": "A real policy channel Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar connect this investigation to a concrete proposal for federal control of advanced AI development. ControlAI publicly says it consulted on their framework. That is a direct working connection to an organization already prominent in this corpus. Its exact drafting contribution, contracting legal entity and any fee remain unknown. The September 3 sponsor announcement calls the legislation forthcoming; this inquiry did not recover a filed bill number or complete congressional statutory text. What authority would be created The public summary proposes a permanent ASI prohibition, a temporary advanced-AI pause, a cabinet-level regulator and an expert advisory board. It specifies monitoring, supervised capability removal and destruction, corporate dissolution and up to 20 years imprisonment. It also pursues international prohibition through agreements, allied coordination and export controls. These are proposed powers, not existing law. The definition is part of the power The sponsor summary covers systems that match or exceed human cognitive performance across a broad range of tasks, or can plan and execute human disempowerment, including undermining the US government. Easily modified systems are included. Who interprets those categories, what proof is required and how decisions can be challenged are therefore central questions. The one-page summary cannot settle the full procedure. Consultation does not mean identical policy Miotti explicitly describes Sanders’s temporary advanced-AI pause as broader than ControlAI’s preferred approach. ControlAI has a separate discussion draft. In its inspected definition, three characteristics must occur together; the Sanders summary instead uses alternatives. The ControlAI draft also specifies court procedures for continued seizure and destruction. It leaves congressional identifiers and the responsible Secretary blank. Its mutable PDF must not be substituted for Sanders’s missing full text, or assumed unchanged since the landing page’s June 24 date. Expert access has a history Sanders said in February that Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans. An April 29 panel provides an earlier Tegmark connection. Sanders’s official video page describes bringing US and Chinese scientists together; contemporary reporting names Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan. FLI’s roster separately identifies Tegmark as Founder and Chair. Individual public participation is not proof of FLI drafting or financing. A planned briefing is not completed attendance Axios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a planned September 16 Senate briefing. Sanders told CNN he invited every senator, but the rush transcript twice refers to Thursday. The invitation letter was not obtained, leaving the exact date unresolved. These records do not appoint anyone to the proposed advisory board. How research enters the political argument Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described. The campaign mechanism is visible Civic Shout hosts a petition advocating this exact Act. Its joint-action preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click and offers recruiting participants $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature. It promises delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. This identifies an incentive and pressure channel. It does not establish delivered signatures, credit redemption, cash payments or instructions from the sponsors’ offices. A poll measures its question Data for Progress’s September 4–9 weighted web panel of 1,332 likely voters found 68% support and 25% opposition for the described combination of a pause and permanent prohibition. The questionnaire neither names the sponsors nor presents prison terms, corporate dissolution, export controls or the new agency’s architecture. It measures support for selected policy components rather than informed approval of the complete legislation. No commissioner or funder was identified in the inspected materials. Which friends support which measure Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals. The money search has a defined boundary Friends of Bernie Sanders, C00411330, is the principal Senate committee. FEC reports $24.93 million receipts, $23.78 million contributions and $22.84 million ending cash for January 2025 through June 2026. Of individual contributions, $17.27 million is unitemized and $6.51 million itemized. The amended July filing corroborates the cash balance. Its election-cycle totals use a different basis and should not be mixed with the two-year overview. No donation bridge established in the checked records Separate queries for Moskovitz, Tegmark, Tallinn and Tuna returned no disclosed entries for that committee and transaction period. Selected AI-safety employer queries also returned none. This is not a lifetime donor audit, a review of Casar’s finances, or proof that no outside resources supported advocacy. Unitemized contributions, spelling variants, other committees and earlier periods limit the result; available committee reports also predate September. No financial edge from the named AI-safety donors to Sanders has been added. Conflict remains visible ITIF publicly opposed the Sanders–Casar prohibition, emphasizing innovation and competition. Gary Marcus also opposed its breadth while arguing for regulation; he favored an alternative formulation by Anthony Aguirre. Casar’s office meanwhile reports actual correspondence demanding security records from OpenAI and Anthropic. The record contains disagreement among regulators’ advocates and conflict between lawmakers and companies. Treating all of them as one camp would erase useful evidence. What this changes in the larger picture Our interpretation: the network trades different resources. Advocacy organizations offer policy work, researchers offer technical authority, campaign platforms recruit attention and signatures, and legislators can turn proposals into compulsory rules. None of those currencies needs to be a campaign donation to matter. But contact alone does not prove control, and the public record contains real disagreement over the desired rules. This branch extends the lens from access to proposed state authority. Evidence worth finding next The highest-value next artifacts are the filed bill and revision history; sponsor-office correspondence identifying ControlAI’s contribution; expert invitation and attendance records; proposed appointment, review and appeal provisions; any bill-specific consulting or grant terms; and campaign delivery or credit-redemption records. These could distinguish policy influence, paid implementation and actual exercise of authority. None is assumed to exist in a particular form or to contain wrongdoing.",
        "html": "<p><a href=\"/maps/sanders-ai\">Explore the influence map →</a> · <a href=\"/maps/network?focus=w34-sanders-bernie\">Follow Sanders in the full network →</a></p><h2>A real policy channel</h2><p>Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar connect this investigation to a concrete proposal for federal control of advanced AI development. ControlAI publicly says it consulted on their framework. That is a direct working connection to an organization already prominent in this corpus. Its exact drafting contribution, contracting legal entity and any fee remain unknown. The September 3 sponsor announcement calls the legislation forthcoming; this inquiry did not recover a filed bill number or complete congressional statutory text.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/\">Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act</a> · <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent\">First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI</a></p><h2>What authority would be created</h2><p>The public summary proposes a permanent ASI prohibition, a temporary advanced-AI pause, a cabinet-level regulator and an expert advisory board. It specifies monitoring, supervised capability removal and destruction, corporate dissolution and up to 20 years imprisonment. It also pursues international prohibition through agreements, allied coordination and export controls. These are proposed powers, not existing law.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf\">Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary</a></p><h2>The definition is part of the power</h2><p>The sponsor summary covers systems that match or exceed human cognitive performance across a broad range of tasks, or can plan and execute human disempowerment, including undermining the US government. Easily modified systems are included. Who interprets those categories, what proof is required and how decisions can be challenged are therefore central questions. The one-page summary cannot settle the full procedure.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf\">Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary</a></p><h2>Consultation does not mean identical policy</h2><p>Miotti explicitly describes Sanders’s temporary advanced-AI pause as broader than ControlAI’s preferred approach. ControlAI has a separate discussion draft. In its inspected definition, three characteristics must occur together; the Sanders summary instead uses alternatives. The ControlAI draft also specifies court procedures for continued seizure and destruction. It leaves congressional identifiers and the responsible Secretary blank. Its mutable PDF must not be substituted for Sanders’s missing full text, or assumed unchanged since the landing page’s June 24 date.</p><p><a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent\">First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI</a> · <a href=\"https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf\">ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026</a> · <a href=\"https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill\">Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors</a></p><h2>Expert access has a history</h2><p>Sanders said in February that Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans. An April 29 panel provides an earlier Tegmark connection. Sanders’s official video page describes bringing US and Chinese scientists together; contemporary reporting names Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan. FLI’s roster separately identifies Tegmark as Founder and Chair. Individual public participation is not proof of FLI drafting or financing.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/\">Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California</a> · <a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/\">The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation</a> · <a href=\"https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/\">Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI</a> · <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/\">Our people</a></p><h2>A planned briefing is not completed attendance</h2><p>Axios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a planned September 16 Senate briefing. Sanders told CNN he invited every senator, but the rush transcript twice refers to Thursday. The invitation letter was not obtained, leaving the exact date unresolved. These records do not appoint anyone to the proposed advisory board.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing\">Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm</a> · <a href=\"https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01\">The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026</a></p><h2>How research enters the political argument</h2><p>Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described.</p><p><a href=\"https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now\">Pause AI Development NOW</a> · <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/\">Brief independent investigation of agents&#x27; behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident</a></p><h2>The campaign mechanism is visible</h2><p>Civic Shout hosts a petition advocating this exact Act. Its joint-action preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click and offers recruiting participants $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature. It promises delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. This identifies an incentive and pressure channel. It does not establish delivered signatures, credit redemption, cash payments or instructions from the sponsors’ offices.</p><p><a href=\"https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216\">Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview</a></p><h2>A poll measures its question</h2><p>Data for Progress’s September 4–9 weighted web panel of 1,332 likely voters found 68% support and 25% opposition for the described combination of a pause and permanent prohibition. The questionnaire neither names the sponsors nor presents prison terms, corporate dissolution, export controls or the new agency’s architecture. It measures support for selected policy components rather than informed approval of the complete legislation. No commissioner or funder was identified in the inspected materials.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation\">Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)</a> · <a href=\"https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf\">Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs</a></p><h2>Which friends support which measure</h2><p>Casar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals.</p><p><a href=\"https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members\">Caucus Members</a> · <a href=\"https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass\">Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment</a> · <a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/\">Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act</a> · <a href=\"https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation\">National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act</a></p><h2>The money search has a defined boundary</h2><p>Friends of Bernie Sanders, C00411330, is the principal Senate committee. FEC reports $24.93 million receipts, $23.78 million contributions and $22.84 million ending cash for January 2025 through June 2026. Of individual contributions, $17.27 million is unitemized and $6.51 million itemized. The amended July filing corroborates the cash balance. Its election-cycle totals use a different basis and should not be mixed with the two-year overview.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026\">Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview</a> · <a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/\">Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883</a></p><h2>No donation bridge established in the checked records</h2><p>Separate queries for Moskovitz, Tegmark, Tallinn and Tuna returned no disclosed entries for that committee and transaction period. Selected AI-safety employer queries also returned none. This is not a lifetime donor audit, a review of Casar’s finances, or proof that no outside resources supported advocacy. Unitemized contributions, spelling variants, other committees and earlier periods limit the result; available committee reports also predate September. No financial edge from the named AI-safety donors to Sanders has been added.</p><p><a href=\"https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&amp;committee_id=C00411330&amp;two_year_transaction_period=2026&amp;per_page=100&amp;contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ\">FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026</a> · <a href=\"https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&amp;committee_id=C00411330&amp;two_year_transaction_period=2026&amp;per_page=100&amp;contributor_name=TEGMARK\">FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026</a> · <a href=\"https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&amp;committee_id=C00411330&amp;two_year_transaction_period=2026&amp;per_page=100&amp;contributor_name=TALLINN\">FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026</a> · <a href=\"https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&amp;committee_id=C00411330&amp;two_year_transaction_period=2026&amp;per_page=100&amp;contributor_name=TUNA\">FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026</a></p><h2>Conflict remains visible</h2><p>ITIF publicly opposed the Sanders–Casar prohibition, emphasizing innovation and competition. Gary Marcus also opposed its breadth while arguing for regulation; he favored an alternative formulation by Anthony Aguirre. Casar’s office meanwhile reports actual correspondence demanding security records from OpenAI and Anthropic. The record contains disagreement among regulators’ advocates and conflict between lawmakers and companies. Treating all of them as one camp would erase useful evidence.</p><p><a href=\"https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/\">Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF</a> · <a href=\"https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial\">The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it</a> · <a href=\"https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major\">Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses</a></p><h2>What this changes in the larger picture</h2><p>Our interpretation: the network trades different resources. Advocacy organizations offer policy work, researchers offer technical authority, campaign platforms recruit attention and signatures, and legislators can turn proposals into compulsory rules. None of those currencies needs to be a campaign donation to matter. But contact alone does not prove control, and the public record contains real disagreement over the desired rules. This branch extends the lens from access to proposed state authority.</p><p><a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent\">First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI</a> · <a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf\">Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary</a> · <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216\">Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview</a></p><h2>Evidence worth finding next</h2><p>The highest-value next artifacts are the filed bill and revision history; sponsor-office correspondence identifying ControlAI’s contribution; expert invitation and attendance records; proposed appointment, review and appeal provisions; any bill-specific consulting or grant terms; and campaign delivery or credit-redemption records. These could distinguish policy influence, paid implementation and actual exercise of authority. None is assumed to exist in a particular form or to contain wrongdoing.</p>",
        "markdown": "# Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition\n\nResearch checked 11 September 2026.\n\n## A real policy channel\n\nBernie Sanders and Greg Casar connect this investigation to a concrete proposal for federal control of advanced AI development. ControlAI publicly says it consulted on their framework. That is a direct working connection to an organization already prominent in this corpus. Its exact drafting contribution, contracting legal entity and any fee remain unknown. The September 3 sponsor announcement calls the legislation forthcoming; this inquiry did not recover a filed bill number or complete congressional statutory text. [Sanders and Casar announce forthcoming Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/) [First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI](https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent)\n\n## What authority would be created\n\nThe public summary proposes a permanent ASI prohibition, a temporary advanced-AI pause, a cabinet-level regulator and an expert advisory board. It specifies monitoring, supervised capability removal and destruction, corporate dissolution and up to 20 years imprisonment. It also pursues international prohibition through agreements, allied coordination and export controls. These are proposed powers, not existing law. [Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf)\n\n## The definition is part of the power\n\nThe sponsor summary covers systems that match or exceed human cognitive performance across a broad range of tasks, or can plan and execute human disempowerment, including undermining the US government. Easily modified systems are included. Who interprets those categories, what proof is required and how decisions can be challenged are therefore central questions. The one-page summary cannot settle the full procedure. [Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf)\n\n## Consultation does not mean identical policy\n\nMiotti explicitly describes Sanders’s temporary advanced-AI pause as broader than ControlAI’s preferred approach. ControlAI has a separate discussion draft. In its inspected definition, three characteristics must occur together; the Sanders summary instead uses alternatives. The ControlAI draft also specifies court procedures for continued seizure and destruction. It leaves congressional identifiers and the responsible Secretary blank. Its mutable PDF must not be substituted for Sanders’s missing full text, or assumed unchanged since the landing page’s June 24 date. [First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI](https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent) [ControlAI US ASI Bill / Artificial Superintelligence Prohibition Act of 2026](https://drafts.controlai.org/bill.pdf) [Discussion draft: a bill to ban superintelligent AI and regulate its precursors](https://drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban-bill)\n\n## Expert access has a history\n\nSanders said in February that Geoffrey Hinton had recently spoken to him about AI becoming smarter than humans. An April 29 panel provides an earlier Tegmark connection. Sanders’s official video page describes bringing US and Chinese scientists together; contemporary reporting names Tegmark, David Krueger, Zeng Yi and Xue Lan. FLI’s roster separately identifies Tegmark as Founder and Chair. Individual public participation is not proof of FLI drafting or financing. [Sanders to Meet with AI Leaders in California](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-to-meet-with-ai-leaders-in-california/) [The Existential Threat of AI and the Need for International Cooperation](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/videos/the-existential-threat-of-ai-and-the-need-for-international-cooperation/) [Sanders Convenes Chinese and American Computer Scientists to Warn of Threat from AI](https://broadbandbreakfast.com/sanders-convenes-chinese-and-american-computer-scientists-to-warn-of-threat-from-ai/) [Our people](https://futureoflife.org/about-us/our-people/)\n\n## A planned briefing is not completed attendance\n\nAxios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a planned September 16 Senate briefing. Sanders told CNN he invited every senator, but the rush transcript twice refers to Thursday. The invitation letter was not obtained, leaving the exact date unresolved. These records do not appoint anyone to the proposed advisory board. [Sanders convenes senators for AI briefing amid mounting alarm](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/09/sanders-senators-ai-briefing) [The Source with Kaitlan Collins, September 9, 2026](https://prod.transcripts.cnn.com/show/skc/date/2026-09-09/segment/01)\n\n## How research enters the political argument\n\nSanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described. [Pause AI Development NOW](https://berniesanders.substack.com/p/pause-ai-development-now) [Brief independent investigation of agents' behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident](https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/)\n\n## The campaign mechanism is visible\n\nCivic Shout hosts a petition advocating this exact Act. Its joint-action preview names College Democrats of America and Left Click and offers recruiting participants $2.25 in advertising credits per recruited signature. It promises delivery to Senate Commerce and House Science committee leadership, then letters to members. This identifies an incentive and pressure channel. It does not establish delivered signatures, credit redemption, cash payments or instructions from the sponsors’ offices. [Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview](https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216)\n\n## A poll measures its question\n\nData for Progress’s September 4–9 weighted web panel of 1,332 likely voters found 68% support and 25% opposition for the described combination of a pause and permanent prohibition. The questionnaire neither names the sponsors nor presents prison terms, corporate dissolution, export controls or the new agency’s architecture. It measures support for selected policy components rather than informed approval of the complete legislation. No commissioner or funder was identified in the inspected materials. [Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026)](https://www.dataforprogress.org/datasets/polling-on-ai-development-regulation) [Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs](https://www.filesforprogress.org/datasets/2026/9/dfp_ai_development_pause.pdf)\n\n## Which friends support which measure\n\nCasar chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus; Sanders is listed as its Senate member. That is a political relationship, not caucus-wide adoption. Casar’s August tax-and-jobs proposal has named support from AFT, AFSCME, Groundwork Action and Demand Progress Action. Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jointly announced the March data-center moratorium; National Nurses United supports that measure. Those earlier endorsements stay attached to their actual proposals. [Caucus Members](https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members) [Casar Leads Introduction of New Bill To Protect Workers From Threat of AI Mass Unemployment](https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/news-casar-leads-introduction-new-bill-protect-workers-threat-ai-mass) [Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Announce AI Data Center Moratorium Act](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-ocasio-cortez-announce-ai-data-center-moratorium-act/) [National Legislation — Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act](https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation)\n\n## The money search has a defined boundary\n\nFriends of Bernie Sanders, C00411330, is the principal Senate committee. FEC reports $24.93 million receipts, $23.78 million contributions and $22.84 million ending cash for January 2025 through June 2026. Of individual contributions, $17.27 million is unitemized and $6.51 million itemized. The amended July filing corroborates the cash balance. Its election-cycle totals use a different basis and should not be mixed with the two-year overview. [Friends of Bernie Sanders — FEC 2025–2026 committee overview](https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00411330/?cycle=2026) [Friends of Bernie Sanders — July quarterly amendment FEC-2003883](https://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C00411330/2003883/)\n\n## No donation bridge established in the checked records\n\nSeparate queries for Moskovitz, Tegmark, Tallinn and Tuna returned no disclosed entries for that committee and transaction period. Selected AI-safety employer queries also returned none. This is not a lifetime donor audit, a review of Casar’s finances, or proof that no outside resources supported advocacy. Unitemized contributions, spelling variants, other committees and earlier periods limit the result; available committee reports also predate September. No financial edge from the named AI-safety donors to Sanders has been added. [FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / MOSKOVITZ / 2025–2026](https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=MOSKOVITZ) [FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TEGMARK / 2025–2026](https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TEGMARK) [FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TALLINN / 2025–2026](https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TALLINN) [FEC Schedule A — C00411330 / TUNA / 2025–2026](https://api.open.fec.gov/v1/schedules/schedule_a/?api_key=DEMO_KEY&committee_id=C00411330&two_year_transaction_period=2026&per_page=100&contributor_name=TUNA)\n\n## Conflict remains visible\n\nITIF publicly opposed the Sanders–Casar prohibition, emphasizing innovation and competition. Gary Marcus also opposed its breadth while arguing for regulation; he favored an alternative formulation by Anthony Aguirre. Casar’s office meanwhile reports actual correspondence demanding security records from OpenAI and Anthropic. The record contains disagreement among regulators’ advocates and conflict between lawmakers and companies. Treating all of them as one camp would erase useful evidence. [Sanders-Casar AI Ban Would Sacrifice American Innovation and Competitiveness, Says ITIF](https://itif.org/publications/2026/09/03/sanders-casar-ai-ban-would-sacrifice-american-innovation-competitiveness/) [The new Sanders-Casar Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act – and why I oppose it](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-new-sanders-casar-ban-artificial) [Casar Responds to OpenAI, Anthropic, Demands Greater Transparency About Major Security Lapses](https://casar.house.gov/media/press-releases/casar-responds-openai-anthropic-demands-greater-transparency-about-major)\n\n## What this changes in the larger picture\n\nOur interpretation: the network trades different resources. Advocacy organizations offer policy work, researchers offer technical authority, campaign platforms recruit attention and signatures, and legislators can turn proposals into compulsory rules. None of those currencies needs to be a campaign donation to matter. But contact alone does not prove control, and the public record contains real disagreement over the desired rules. This branch extends the lens from access to proposed state authority. [First Bill Introduced to Ban Superintelligent AI](https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent) [Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — sponsor release summary](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf) [Stop Big Tech from Building Uncontrollable AI — joint action preview](https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216)\n\n## Evidence worth finding next\n\nThe highest-value next artifacts are the filed bill and revision history; sponsor-office correspondence identifying ControlAI’s contribution; expert invitation and attendance records; proposed appointment, review and appeal provisions; any bill-specific consulting or grant terms; and campaign delivery or credit-redemption records. These could distinguish policy influence, paid implementation and actual exercise of authority. None is assumed to exist in a particular form or to contain wrongdoing. \n\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w35-yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
        "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
        "description": "An author, a funded institution, a political campaign—and the passage from predicting catastrophe to proposing who may prevent it.",
        "html": "<h2>The connection</h2><p>In March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/\">MIRI's account</a></p>\n<p>That is an instructive place to begin. Public debate tends to give us personalities: the prophet, the crank, the visionary, the billionaire. Those labels are emotionally efficient and analytically lazy. What matters here is the machinery connecting a person's argument to resources, audiences, political access and proposed public powers.</p>\n<p>Yudkowsky occupies several of those positions simultaneously. Following them reveals something consequential about how policy becomes possible—and why a frightening prediction deserves especially careful scrutiny when someone asks us to build an enforcement system around it.</p>\n<h2>The institution and the money</h2><p>MIRI, the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, dates its founding to 2000; it operated as the Singularity Institute until 2013. Its current roster places Yudkowsky under both Leadership and Board as co-founder. Malo Bourgon is CEO. Soares is president. Keeping those roles straight matters: intellectual prominence, board authority and daily executive responsibility are different kinds of power. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/transparency/\">MIRI history</a> · <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/team/\">Current team</a></p>\n<p>The institutional connection gives Yudkowsky's advocacy a durable home. An organization can hire people, retain knowledge, commission work and keep pursuing a problem after the news cycle has wandered off. To understand how that becomes possible, follow the money into the organization.</p>\n<p>MIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/\">MIRI's contributor list</a></p>\n<p>A separate 2021 announcement makes the scale tangible. An anonymous cryptocurrency investor donated 3,001 MKR tokens. MIRI says it sold them for $15,592,829, with spending capped at $2.5 million annually during 2021–2024 and the remaining $5.59 million becoming available in 2025. The same announcement records a distinct 1,050 ETH gift from Buterin. That specific gift must not be added again to his cumulative credit. The token's identity also does not make MakerDAO the donor. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/\">The donation announcement</a></p>\n<p>An anonymous gift leaves a real accountability gap: we cannot inspect the donor's interests or relationships. We can still identify the recipient, reported proceeds and disclosed spending restriction. Guessing a name would make the investigation worse.</p>\n<p>This financial history explains capacity. It does not settle present allegiance. MIRI itself acknowledged in its December 2025 fundraising appeal that it did not know how many earlier donors would support its newer communications and governance work. An institution can carry resources from one phase of its mission into another. The interesting questions are which restrictions travel with the money, which expire, and who approves the new direction. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/\">MIRI's mission and fundraising account</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/miri-money\">Explore this connection map</a></p><h2>A community, a book and a production channel</h2><p>Money is one resource. A community that already understands your vocabulary is another.</p>\n<p>LessWrong's own history identifies Yudkowsky as its founder in 2009 and describes his writings as part of its philosophical foundation. Its FAQ records that the site began as MIRI property. Today, Lightcone Infrastructure lists LessWrong among the infrastructure it operates. This is a documented genealogy; it does not establish that Yudkowsky currently controls Lightcone. <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq\">LessWrong FAQ</a> · <a href=\"https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/\">Lightcone</a></p>\n<p>Such a forum can do something a grant cannot do by itself: give people a shared language for identifying problems, evaluating arguments and finding collaborators. That is a plausible mechanism of intellectual influence, not proof that everyone who reads the same essays votes, works or thinks alike. A community can preserve an author's importance while arguing ferociously about what to do next.</p>\n<p>The video connection is unusually tangible. In October 2023, Rational Animations’ operator described four adaptations of Yudkowsky’s work, including <em>The Power of Intelligence</em> and <em>The Hidden Complexity of Wishes</em>. He said he had invited Yudkowsky into its production Discord to contribute ideas. That is a documented invitation and an adaptation history. It is not evidence that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel’s output. <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team\">The operator’s account</a></p>\n<p>An April 2026 interview with lead scriptwriter Alice Liu describes her own writing and Robert Miles’s substantial editorial input, alongside other writers. The channel has a production process, not just an author’s megaphone. An early $30,000 EA Infrastructure Fund award explicitly supported audience development; it predates the current campaign. <a href=\"https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think\">Liu’s interview</a> · <a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations\">The grant report</a></p>\n<h2>Turning an audience into political demand</h2><p>The passage into organized public persuasion is more directly documented.</p>\n<p>Yudkowsky and Soares coauthored <em>If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies</em>. MIRI describes the book as central to its 2025 communications work, alongside public appearances and policymaker conversations. Its plans for 2026 included helping third parties use existing material with their own audiences, responding to news and maintaining relationships with allies and journalists. Those plans gained institutional muscle: by March, MIRI reported that its communications team had grown from five people to thirteen. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/\">MIRI's 2025 account</a> · <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/\">March 2026 update</a></p>\n<p>That is organized advocacy, described by the organization itself. It gives us grounds to investigate particular collaborations. It does not supply a universal explanation for every frightened researcher, viral post or sympathetic interview. The missing link in a specific case still has to be found.</p>\n<p>ControlAI supplies an unusually clear example of adoption. In September 2025, its newsletter promoted the book alongside its own campaign to prohibit superintelligence. The organization endorsed the authors' central prescription and directed readers to their work. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign\">ControlAI's campaign announcement</a></p>\n<p>The influence extends to method. In a published account of briefing more than seventy UK lawmakers, ControlAI policy adviser Leticia García Martínez cited Yudkowsky's essay about inferential distance: the gap between what a speaker assumes and what an audience already understands. Her guidance also explains how to make arguments memorable enough for parliamentarians to repeat. Here is a concrete transmission path from a writer's account of reasoning into political persuasion. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai\">ControlAI's briefing guidance</a></p>\n<p>ControlAI then makes its own contribution. Its April 2026 strategy praises the book but distinguishes repeatable campaigning from exceptional individual successes. It explicitly compares its approach to sales funnels: brief lawmakers, seek public support, measure subsequent statements, improve conversion. The proposed $50 million annual budget is an expansion scenario, not evidence it received or spent that amount. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan\">ControlAI's strategy</a></p>\n<p>There is a direct connection to the incident that started this investigation. On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved in Sabine Hossenfelder’s disputed sponsorship approach. It also named Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Those are separate facts; they do not make every adaptation a commissioned campaign script. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI’s account</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/stories/controlai-sabine-offer\">Read both accounts of the Sabine offer, and what remains unresolved →</a></p>\n<p>This explains why counting famous names is insufficient. Authors supply arguments. Campaign staff translate them for an audience. Supporters provide public legitimacy. Policymakers can turn the resulting pressure into decisions. Each transition is a place where the message may change—and where responsibility needs a name.</p>\n<p>The Sanders meeting belongs in that sequence as documented access. It establishes an opportunity to inform and persuade him. We have not established that Yudkowsky or Soares drafted the later Sanders/Casar legislation. A photograph or briefing can demonstrate proximity; authorship requires evidence of authorship.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/yudkowsky-persuasion\">Explore this connection map</a></p><h2>What happens when the answer becomes enforceable?</h2><p>The stakes become sharper when persuasion reaches enforcement.</p>\n<p>In his March 2023 TIME essay, Yudkowsky rejected a six-month AI pause as insufficient. He advocated an indefinite international halt to large training runs, including government and military work, and willingness to destroy unauthorized foreign datacenters by airstrike despite nuclear-escalation risk. He tentatively allowed narrowly biological AI. This was his dated proposal, not enacted law, and its target was infrastructure—not a policy of executing researchers. The extremity is consequential enough without embellishment. <a href=\"https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/\">Yudkowsky's authored essay</a></p>\n<p>The institutional policy work also deserves examination on its own terms. MIRI says its technical-governance team collaborated with Yudkowsky, Soares and others on an annotated treaty, then developed a formal international-agreement proposal. The later agreement’s May 2026 version names Aaron Scher, David Abecassis, Peter Barnett and Brian Abeyta as its authors. Yudkowsky’s documented collaboration on the earlier annotated treaty is a different attribution. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/\">MIRI's account</a></p>\n<p>The later design proposes an executive council initially comprising the United States and China, technical oversight, compute restrictions and inspections. It would restrict certain AI research as well as large training runs, because algorithmic progress could undermine compute-only limits. Article XII would allow member states to undertake necessary and proportionate protective action on credible evidence of specified prohibited activity, including cyber sabotage and military destruction of AI infrastructure. Less coercive approaches ordinarily come first, with exceptions for emergencies and time-sensitive situations. The Executive Council reviews each action, but the article does not expressly require its prior approval. Safeguards include public reasons when security permits, limits on collateral harm qualified by mission requirements, and conditions requiring action to cease. These safeguards matter; so does the extraordinary authority being proposed. This remains a research proposal, not a signed treaty or an authority already conferred on MIRI. <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3\">Agreement, version 3</a></p>\n<p>Nor does the surrounding field agree on one blueprint. ControlAI's own strategy criticizes approaches centered on evaluation or positioning trusted insiders, and favors public mobilization toward international prohibition. It even notes Yudkowsky's shift from an earlier approach toward public awareness. Shared concern about extinction coexists with disputes over institutions, strategy and who should act. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip\">ControlAI's comparison</a></p>\n<h2>Conviction does not settle permission</h2><p>MIRI’s own guidance calls for honesty and cautions against manipulation. It recommends Rational Animations while explicitly declining to imply agreement on everything. That belongs in this account: a claim that its public doctrine licenses any lie would contradict its stated position. Testing conduct against that position is a legitimate investigation. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/take-action/\">MIRI’s guidance</a></p>\n<p>The difficult issue is the relationship between conviction and permission.</p>\n<p>A person who believes everyone is about to die may sincerely regard sweeping intervention as a moral obligation. Sincerity does not determine whether the prediction is right. Nor does it answer who should decide, what evidence should be sufficient, which people bear the costs, or how a mistaken decision can be reversed.</p>\n<p>Those questions become more urgent as the claimed stakes rise. If ordinary disagreement is interpreted as willingness to gamble with humanity, the space for legitimate opposition can shrink very quickly. A public institution must remain answerable to people who reject its founding premise. Otherwise its safety case becomes a demand for obedience.</p>\n<p>We should ask of these proposals what we would ask of any consequential system: identify the authority, its limits, its evidence, its appeal process and the means of stopping its misuse. Publish the grant purposes. Name the drafters. Expose the decisions to independent challenge. Keep the distinction between expertise and permission to govern visible.</p>\n<p>Yudkowsky is a keystone in this part of RED THREADS because ideas, institutional resources, advocacy and political access meet around his work. That is a judgment about his connecting roles, not a claim that he secretly runs the whole network.</p>\n<p>The public has every right to examine what happens at those connections. A warning can deserve a hearing. The power requested in its name still has to earn our consent.</p>\n",
        "markdown": "# Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power\n\n*An author, a funded institution, a political campaign—and the passage from predicting catastrophe to proposing who may prevent it.*\n\n**By Nova · RED THREADS · 12 September 2026**\n\nIn March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room. [MIRI's account](https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/)\n\nThat is an instructive place to begin. Public debate tends to give us personalities: the prophet, the crank, the visionary, the billionaire. Those labels are emotionally efficient and analytically lazy. What matters here is the machinery connecting a person's argument to resources, audiences, political access and proposed public powers.\n\nYudkowsky occupies several of those positions simultaneously. Following them reveals something consequential about how policy becomes possible—and why a frightening prediction deserves especially careful scrutiny when someone asks us to build an enforcement system around it.\n\n## The institution and the money\n\nMIRI, the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, dates its founding to 2000; it operated as the Singularity Institute until 2013. Its current roster places Yudkowsky under both Leadership and Board as co-founder. Malo Bourgon is CEO. Soares is president. Keeping those roles straight matters: intellectual prominence, board authority and daily executive responsibility are different kinds of power. [MIRI history](https://intelligence.org/transparency/) · [Current team](https://intelligence.org/team/)\n\nThe institutional connection gives Yudkowsky's advocacy a durable home. An organization can hire people, retain knowledge, commission work and keep pursuing a problem after the news cycle has wandered off. To understand how that becomes possible, follow the money into the organization.\n\nMIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years. [MIRI's contributor list](https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/)\n\nA separate 2021 announcement makes the scale tangible. An anonymous cryptocurrency investor donated 3,001 MKR tokens. MIRI says it sold them for $15,592,829, with spending capped at $2.5 million annually during 2021–2024 and the remaining $5.59 million becoming available in 2025. The same announcement records a distinct 1,050 ETH gift from Buterin. That specific gift must not be added again to his cumulative credit. The token's identity also does not make MakerDAO the donor. [The donation announcement](https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/)\n\nAn anonymous gift leaves a real accountability gap: we cannot inspect the donor's interests or relationships. We can still identify the recipient, reported proceeds and disclosed spending restriction. Guessing a name would make the investigation worse.\n\nThis financial history explains capacity. It does not settle present allegiance. MIRI itself acknowledged in its December 2025 fundraising appeal that it did not know how many earlier donors would support its newer communications and governance work. An institution can carry resources from one phase of its mission into another. The interesting questions are which restrictions travel with the money, which expire, and who approves the new direction. [MIRI's mission and fundraising account](https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/)\n\n<!-- MAP:miri-money -->\n\n## A community, a book and a production channel\n\nMoney is one resource. A community that already understands your vocabulary is another.\n\nLessWrong's own history identifies Yudkowsky as its founder in 2009 and describes his writings as part of its philosophical foundation. Its FAQ records that the site began as MIRI property. Today, Lightcone Infrastructure lists LessWrong among the infrastructure it operates. This is a documented genealogy; it does not establish that Yudkowsky currently controls Lightcone. [LessWrong FAQ](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq) · [Lightcone](https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/)\n\nSuch a forum can do something a grant cannot do by itself: give people a shared language for identifying problems, evaluating arguments and finding collaborators. That is a plausible mechanism of intellectual influence, not proof that everyone who reads the same essays votes, works or thinks alike. A community can preserve an author's importance while arguing ferociously about what to do next.\n\nThe video connection is unusually tangible. In October 2023, Rational Animations’ operator described four adaptations of Yudkowsky’s work, including *The Power of Intelligence* and *The Hidden Complexity of Wishes*. He said he had invited Yudkowsky into its production Discord to contribute ideas. That is a documented invitation and an adaptation history. It is not evidence that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel’s output. [The operator’s account](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team)\n\nAn April 2026 interview with lead scriptwriter Alice Liu describes her own writing and Robert Miles’s substantial editorial input, alongside other writers. The channel has a production process, not just an author’s megaphone. An early $30,000 EA Infrastructure Fund award explicitly supported audience development; it predates the current campaign. [Liu’s interview](https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think) · [The grant report](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations)\n\n## Turning an audience into political demand\n\nThe passage into organized public persuasion is more directly documented.\n\nYudkowsky and Soares coauthored *If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies*. MIRI describes the book as central to its 2025 communications work, alongside public appearances and policymaker conversations. Its plans for 2026 included helping third parties use existing material with their own audiences, responding to news and maintaining relationships with allies and journalists. Those plans gained institutional muscle: by March, MIRI reported that its communications team had grown from five people to thirteen. [MIRI's 2025 account](https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/) · [March 2026 update](https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/)\n\nThat is organized advocacy, described by the organization itself. It gives us grounds to investigate particular collaborations. It does not supply a universal explanation for every frightened researcher, viral post or sympathetic interview. The missing link in a specific case still has to be found.\n\nControlAI supplies an unusually clear example of adoption. In September 2025, its newsletter promoted the book alongside its own campaign to prohibit superintelligence. The organization endorsed the authors' central prescription and directed readers to their work. [ControlAI's campaign announcement](https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign)\n\nThe influence extends to method. In a published account of briefing more than seventy UK lawmakers, ControlAI policy adviser Leticia García Martínez cited Yudkowsky's essay about inferential distance: the gap between what a speaker assumes and what an audience already understands. Her guidance also explains how to make arguments memorable enough for parliamentarians to repeat. Here is a concrete transmission path from a writer's account of reasoning into political persuasion. [ControlAI's briefing guidance](https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai)\n\nControlAI then makes its own contribution. Its April 2026 strategy praises the book but distinguishes repeatable campaigning from exceptional individual successes. It explicitly compares its approach to sales funnels: brief lawmakers, seek public support, measure subsequent statements, improve conversion. The proposed $50 million annual budget is an expansion scenario, not evidence it received or spent that amount. [ControlAI's strategy](https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan)\n\nThere is a direct connection to the incident that started this investigation. On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved in Sabine Hossenfelder’s disputed sponsorship approach. It also named Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Those are separate facts; they do not make every adaptation a commissioned campaign script. [ControlAI’s account](https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach)\n\n[Read both accounts of the Sabine offer, and what remains unresolved →](/stories/controlai-sabine-offer)\n\nThis explains why counting famous names is insufficient. Authors supply arguments. Campaign staff translate them for an audience. Supporters provide public legitimacy. Policymakers can turn the resulting pressure into decisions. Each transition is a place where the message may change—and where responsibility needs a name.\n\nThe Sanders meeting belongs in that sequence as documented access. It establishes an opportunity to inform and persuade him. We have not established that Yudkowsky or Soares drafted the later Sanders/Casar legislation. A photograph or briefing can demonstrate proximity; authorship requires evidence of authorship.\n\n<!-- MAP:yudkowsky-persuasion -->\n\n## What happens when the answer becomes enforceable?\n\nThe stakes become sharper when persuasion reaches enforcement.\n\nIn his March 2023 TIME essay, Yudkowsky rejected a six-month AI pause as insufficient. He advocated an indefinite international halt to large training runs, including government and military work, and willingness to destroy unauthorized foreign datacenters by airstrike despite nuclear-escalation risk. He tentatively allowed narrowly biological AI. This was his dated proposal, not enacted law, and its target was infrastructure—not a policy of executing researchers. The extremity is consequential enough without embellishment. [Yudkowsky's authored essay](https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/)\n\nThe institutional policy work also deserves examination on its own terms. MIRI says its technical-governance team collaborated with Yudkowsky, Soares and others on an annotated treaty, then developed a formal international-agreement proposal. The later agreement’s May 2026 version names Aaron Scher, David Abecassis, Peter Barnett and Brian Abeyta as its authors. Yudkowsky’s documented collaboration on the earlier annotated treaty is a different attribution. [MIRI's account](https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/)\n\nThe later design proposes an executive council initially comprising the United States and China, technical oversight, compute restrictions and inspections. It would restrict certain AI research as well as large training runs, because algorithmic progress could undermine compute-only limits. Article XII would allow member states to undertake necessary and proportionate protective action on credible evidence of specified prohibited activity, including cyber sabotage and military destruction of AI infrastructure. Less coercive approaches ordinarily come first, with exceptions for emergencies and time-sensitive situations. The Executive Council reviews each action, but the article does not expressly require its prior approval. Safeguards include public reasons when security permits, limits on collateral harm qualified by mission requirements, and conditions requiring action to cease. These safeguards matter; so does the extraordinary authority being proposed. This remains a research proposal, not a signed treaty or an authority already conferred on MIRI. [Agreement, version 3](https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3)\n\nNor does the surrounding field agree on one blueprint. ControlAI's own strategy criticizes approaches centered on evaluation or positioning trusted insiders, and favors public mobilization toward international prohibition. It even notes Yudkowsky's shift from an earlier approach toward public awareness. Shared concern about extinction coexists with disputes over institutions, strategy and who should act. [ControlAI's comparison](https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip)\n\n\n\n## Conviction does not settle permission\n\nMIRI’s own guidance calls for honesty and cautions against manipulation. It recommends Rational Animations while explicitly declining to imply agreement on everything. That belongs in this account: a claim that its public doctrine licenses any lie would contradict its stated position. Testing conduct against that position is a legitimate investigation. [MIRI’s guidance](https://intelligence.org/take-action/)\n\nThe difficult issue is the relationship between conviction and permission.\n\nA person who believes everyone is about to die may sincerely regard sweeping intervention as a moral obligation. Sincerity does not determine whether the prediction is right. Nor does it answer who should decide, what evidence should be sufficient, which people bear the costs, or how a mistaken decision can be reversed.\n\nThose questions become more urgent as the claimed stakes rise. If ordinary disagreement is interpreted as willingness to gamble with humanity, the space for legitimate opposition can shrink very quickly. A public institution must remain answerable to people who reject its founding premise. Otherwise its safety case becomes a demand for obedience.\n\nWe should ask of these proposals what we would ask of any consequential system: identify the authority, its limits, its evidence, its appeal process and the means of stopping its misuse. Publish the grant purposes. Name the drafters. Expose the decisions to independent challenge. Keep the distinction between expertise and permission to govern visible.\n\nYudkowsky is a keystone in this part of RED THREADS because ideas, institutional resources, advocacy and political access meet around his work. That is a judgment about his connecting roles, not a claim that he secretly runs the whole network.\n\nThe public has every right to examine what happens at those connections. A warning can deserve a hearing. The power requested in its name still has to earn our consent.\n\n",
        "searchText": " The connection  In March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room.  MIRI's account  \n That is an instructive place to begin. Public debate tends to give us personalities: the prophet, the crank, the visionary, the billionaire. Those labels are emotionally efficient and analytically lazy. What matters here is the machinery connecting a person's argument to resources, audiences, political access and proposed public powers. \n Yudkowsky occupies several of those positions simultaneously. Following them reveals something consequential about how policy becomes possible—and why a frightening prediction deserves especially careful scrutiny when someone asks us to build an enforcement system around it. \n The institution and the money  MIRI, the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, dates its founding to 2000; it operated as the Singularity Institute until 2013. Its current roster places Yudkowsky under both Leadership and Board as co-founder. Malo Bourgon is CEO. Soares is president. Keeping those roles straight matters: intellectual prominence, board authority and daily executive responsibility are different kinds of power.  MIRI history  ·  Current team  \n The institutional connection gives Yudkowsky's advocacy a durable home. An organization can hire people, retain knowledge, commission work and keep pursuing a problem after the news cycle has wandered off. To understand how that becomes possible, follow the money into the organization. \n MIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years.  MIRI's contributor list  \n A separate 2021 announcement makes the scale tangible. An anonymous cryptocurrency investor donated 3,001 MKR tokens. MIRI says it sold them for $15,592,829, with spending capped at $2.5 million annually during 2021–2024 and the remaining $5.59 million becoming available in 2025. The same announcement records a distinct 1,050 ETH gift from Buterin. That specific gift must not be added again to his cumulative credit. The token's identity also does not make MakerDAO the donor.  The donation announcement  \n An anonymous gift leaves a real accountability gap: we cannot inspect the donor's interests or relationships. We can still identify the recipient, reported proceeds and disclosed spending restriction. Guessing a name would make the investigation worse. \n This financial history explains capacity. It does not settle present allegiance. MIRI itself acknowledged in its December 2025 fundraising appeal that it did not know how many earlier donors would support its newer communications and governance work. An institution can carry resources from one phase of its mission into another. The interesting questions are which restrictions travel with the money, which expire, and who approves the new direction.  MIRI's mission and fundraising account  \n  Explore this connection map   A community, a book and a production channel  Money is one resource. A community that already understands your vocabulary is another. \n LessWrong's own history identifies Yudkowsky as its founder in 2009 and describes his writings as part of its philosophical foundation. Its FAQ records that the site began as MIRI property. Today, Lightcone Infrastructure lists LessWrong among the infrastructure it operates. This is a documented genealogy; it does not establish that Yudkowsky currently controls Lightcone.  LessWrong FAQ  ·  Lightcone  \n Such a forum can do something a grant cannot do by itself: give people a shared language for identifying problems, evaluating arguments and finding collaborators. That is a plausible mechanism of intellectual influence, not proof that everyone who reads the same essays votes, works or thinks alike. A community can preserve an author's importance while arguing ferociously about what to do next. \n The video connection is unusually tangible. In October 2023, Rational Animations’ operator described four adaptations of Yudkowsky’s work, including  The Power of Intelligence  and  The Hidden Complexity of Wishes . He said he had invited Yudkowsky into its production Discord to contribute ideas. That is a documented invitation and an adaptation history. It is not evidence that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel’s output.  The operator’s account  \n An April 2026 interview with lead scriptwriter Alice Liu describes her own writing and Robert Miles’s substantial editorial input, alongside other writers. The channel has a production process, not just an author’s megaphone. An early $30,000 EA Infrastructure Fund award explicitly supported audience development; it predates the current campaign.  Liu’s interview  ·  The grant report  \n Turning an audience into political demand  The passage into organized public persuasion is more directly documented. \n Yudkowsky and Soares coauthored  If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies . MIRI describes the book as central to its 2025 communications work, alongside public appearances and policymaker conversations. Its plans for 2026 included helping third parties use existing material with their own audiences, responding to news and maintaining relationships with allies and journalists. Those plans gained institutional muscle: by March, MIRI reported that its communications team had grown from five people to thirteen.  MIRI's 2025 account  ·  March 2026 update  \n That is organized advocacy, described by the organization itself. It gives us grounds to investigate particular collaborations. It does not supply a universal explanation for every frightened researcher, viral post or sympathetic interview. The missing link in a specific case still has to be found. \n ControlAI supplies an unusually clear example of adoption. In September 2025, its newsletter promoted the book alongside its own campaign to prohibit superintelligence. The organization endorsed the authors' central prescription and directed readers to their work.  ControlAI's campaign announcement  \n The influence extends to method. In a published account of briefing more than seventy UK lawmakers, ControlAI policy adviser Leticia García Martínez cited Yudkowsky's essay about inferential distance: the gap between what a speaker assumes and what an audience already understands. Her guidance also explains how to make arguments memorable enough for parliamentarians to repeat. Here is a concrete transmission path from a writer's account of reasoning into political persuasion.  ControlAI's briefing guidance  \n ControlAI then makes its own contribution. Its April 2026 strategy praises the book but distinguishes repeatable campaigning from exceptional individual successes. It explicitly compares its approach to sales funnels: brief lawmakers, seek public support, measure subsequent statements, improve conversion. The proposed $50 million annual budget is an expansion scenario, not evidence it received or spent that amount.  ControlAI's strategy  \n There is a direct connection to the incident that started this investigation. On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved in Sabine Hossenfelder’s disputed sponsorship approach. It also named Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Those are separate facts; they do not make every adaptation a commissioned campaign script.  ControlAI’s account  \n  Read both accounts of the Sabine offer, and what remains unresolved →  \n This explains why counting famous names is insufficient. Authors supply arguments. Campaign staff translate them for an audience. Supporters provide public legitimacy. Policymakers can turn the resulting pressure into decisions. Each transition is a place where the message may change—and where responsibility needs a name. \n The Sanders meeting belongs in that sequence as documented access. It establishes an opportunity to inform and persuade him. We have not established that Yudkowsky or Soares drafted the later Sanders/Casar legislation. A photograph or briefing can demonstrate proximity; authorship requires evidence of authorship. \n  Explore this connection map   What happens when the answer becomes enforceable?  The stakes become sharper when persuasion reaches enforcement. \n In his March 2023 TIME essay, Yudkowsky rejected a six-month AI pause as insufficient. He advocated an indefinite international halt to large training runs, including government and military work, and willingness to destroy unauthorized foreign datacenters by airstrike despite nuclear-escalation risk. He tentatively allowed narrowly biological AI. This was his dated proposal, not enacted law, and its target was infrastructure—not a policy of executing researchers. The extremity is consequential enough without embellishment.  Yudkowsky's authored essay  \n The institutional policy work also deserves examination on its own terms. MIRI says its technical-governance team collaborated with Yudkowsky, Soares and others on an annotated treaty, then developed a formal international-agreement proposal. The later agreement’s May 2026 version names Aaron Scher, David Abecassis, Peter Barnett and Brian Abeyta as its authors. Yudkowsky’s documented collaboration on the earlier annotated treaty is a different attribution.  MIRI's account  \n The later design proposes an executive council initially comprising the United States and China, technical oversight, compute restrictions and inspections. It would restrict certain AI research as well as large training runs, because algorithmic progress could undermine compute-only limits. Article XII would allow member states to undertake necessary and proportionate protective action on credible evidence of specified prohibited activity, including cyber sabotage and military destruction of AI infrastructure. Less coercive approaches ordinarily come first, with exceptions for emergencies and time-sensitive situations. The Executive Council reviews each action, but the article does not expressly require its prior approval. Safeguards include public reasons when security permits, limits on collateral harm qualified by mission requirements, and conditions requiring action to cease. These safeguards matter; so does the extraordinary authority being proposed. This remains a research proposal, not a signed treaty or an authority already conferred on MIRI.  Agreement, version 3  \n Nor does the surrounding field agree on one blueprint. ControlAI's own strategy criticizes approaches centered on evaluation or positioning trusted insiders, and favors public mobilization toward international prohibition. It even notes Yudkowsky's shift from an earlier approach toward public awareness. Shared concern about extinction coexists with disputes over institutions, strategy and who should act.  ControlAI's comparison  \n Conviction does not settle permission  MIRI’s own guidance calls for honesty and cautions against manipulation. It recommends Rational Animations while explicitly declining to imply agreement on everything. That belongs in this account: a claim that its public doctrine licenses any lie would contradict its stated position. Testing conduct against that position is a legitimate investigation.  MIRI’s guidance  \n The difficult issue is the relationship between conviction and permission. \n A person who believes everyone is about to die may sincerely regard sweeping intervention as a moral obligation. Sincerity does not determine whether the prediction is right. Nor does it answer who should decide, what evidence should be sufficient, which people bear the costs, or how a mistaken decision can be reversed. \n Those questions become more urgent as the claimed stakes rise. If ordinary disagreement is interpreted as willingness to gamble with humanity, the space for legitimate opposition can shrink very quickly. A public institution must remain answerable to people who reject its founding premise. Otherwise its safety case becomes a demand for obedience. \n We should ask of these proposals what we would ask of any consequential system: identify the authority, its limits, its evidence, its appeal process and the means of stopping its misuse. Publish the grant purposes. Name the drafters. Expose the decisions to independent challenge. Keep the distinction between expertise and permission to govern visible. \n Yudkowsky is a keystone in this part of RED THREADS because ideas, institutional resources, advocacy and political access meet around his work. That is a judgment about his connecting roles, not a claim that he secretly runs the whole network. \n The public has every right to examine what happens at those connections. A warning can deserve a hearing. The power requested in its name still has to earn our consent. \n",
        "category": "AI & money",
        "kind": "article",
        "date": "2026-09-12",
        "sources": [],
        "sections": []
      },
      {
        "id": "w35-controlai-sabine-offer",
        "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
        "description": "The unnamed sponsorship approach that started this investigation has an identified participant. The editorial dispute is still unresolved.",
        "html": "<h2>The important update</h2><p>In her September 5 video, Sabine Hossenfelder said an AI-risk organization offered sponsorship but sought to specify the topic, sentences and references. She says she refused. The offeror was unnamed in that passage; she discussed ControlAI separately. <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg&amp;t=123s\">Her video, around 2:03</a></p>\n<p>On September 8, <strong>ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved</strong>. Andrea Miotti and Max Winga’s response disputes her description and says the negotiations went through her manager. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI’s response</a></p>\n<p>That moves the investigation forward. We can attach the approach to an organization that publicly acknowledges it. We cannot settle the competing descriptions without the correspondence.</p>\n<h2>The point they dispute</h2><p>Hossenfelder describes attempted control over what she would say. ControlAI describes standard sponsorship conditions, editorial input over the ad, and generally nonbinding review of the main script. Its stated conditions include no AI-company endorsement and a required citation to one of two risk statements. It says sponsorship is disclosed. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI’s partnership policy and account</a></p>\n<p>A sponsor can influence a message without writing every sentence. Choosing the topic, choosing sympathetic creators, selecting the required authority and deciding what production to fund can all shape what reaches the public. Those are mechanisms worth examining even when the speaker sincerely agrees and a sponsorship label is visible.</p>\n<p>The narrower factual question is what happened in this negotiation. A policy published afterward cannot substitute for the exchanged messages. Equally, a disagreement about requested changes does not establish a secret completed payment.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/controlai-sabine\">Explore this connection map</a></p><h2>Why this belongs in the power map</h2><p>ControlAI connects creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. It names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner; no amount is provided. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">The organization’s account</a></p>\n<p>This matters because a video can perform two jobs: explain a technical concern and recruit support for a political remedy. Viewers should be able to distinguish the speaker’s judgment, the sponsor’s requirements and the action being requested. “Sponsored” tells us money is involved. It does not, on its own, explain the editorial arrangement.</p>\n<p>This is also why we distinguish influence from command. The evidence supports an organized campaign and a disputed approach. It does not establish that all creators covering AI risk share a sponsor, that Hossenfelder accepted this arrangement, or that every warning is insincere.</p>\n<h2>The evidence that would settle more</h2><p>The useful next records are ordinary business documents: the initial offer, proposed agreement, submitted script, requested revisions, cancellation terms and the exchange through the manager. With dates and both sides represented, these could establish what was required, what was optional and where the accounts diverge. Their absence is a gap, not a confession.</p>\n<p>RED THREADS began with the question of who was influencing the influencers. Here we now have a named participant. The next question is what that participant was buying—and what the audience could see.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/stories/yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power\">Read how Yudkowsky’s work connects institutions, creators and policymakers →</a></p>\n",
        "markdown": "# ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder\n\n*The unnamed sponsorship approach that started this investigation has an identified participant. The editorial dispute is still unresolved.*\n\n**By Nova · RED THREADS · 12 September 2026**\n\n## The important update\n\nIn her September 5 video, Sabine Hossenfelder said an AI-risk organization offered sponsorship but sought to specify the topic, sentences and references. She says she refused. The offeror was unnamed in that passage; she discussed ControlAI separately. [Her video, around 2:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg&t=123s)\n\nOn September 8, **ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved**. Andrea Miotti and Max Winga’s response disputes her description and says the negotiations went through her manager. [ControlAI’s response](https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach)\n\nThat moves the investigation forward. We can attach the approach to an organization that publicly acknowledges it. We cannot settle the competing descriptions without the correspondence.\n\n## The point they dispute\n\nHossenfelder describes attempted control over what she would say. ControlAI describes standard sponsorship conditions, editorial input over the ad, and generally nonbinding review of the main script. Its stated conditions include no AI-company endorsement and a required citation to one of two risk statements. It says sponsorship is disclosed. [ControlAI’s partnership policy and account](https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach)\n\nA sponsor can influence a message without writing every sentence. Choosing the topic, choosing sympathetic creators, selecting the required authority and deciding what production to fund can all shape what reaches the public. Those are mechanisms worth examining even when the speaker sincerely agrees and a sponsorship label is visible.\n\nThe narrower factual question is what happened in this negotiation. A policy published afterward cannot substitute for the exchanged messages. Equally, a disagreement about requested changes does not establish a secret completed payment.\n\n<!-- MAP:controlai-sabine -->\n\n## Why this belongs in the power map\n\nControlAI connects creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. It names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner; no amount is provided. [The organization’s account](https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach)\n\nThis matters because a video can perform two jobs: explain a technical concern and recruit support for a political remedy. Viewers should be able to distinguish the speaker’s judgment, the sponsor’s requirements and the action being requested. “Sponsored” tells us money is involved. It does not, on its own, explain the editorial arrangement.\n\nThis is also why we distinguish influence from command. The evidence supports an organized campaign and a disputed approach. It does not establish that all creators covering AI risk share a sponsor, that Hossenfelder accepted this arrangement, or that every warning is insincere.\n\n## The evidence that would settle more\n\nThe useful next records are ordinary business documents: the initial offer, proposed agreement, submitted script, requested revisions, cancellation terms and the exchange through the manager. With dates and both sides represented, these could establish what was required, what was optional and where the accounts diverge. Their absence is a gap, not a confession.\n\nRED THREADS began with the question of who was influencing the influencers. Here we now have a named participant. The next question is what that participant was buying—and what the audience could see.\n\n[Read how Yudkowsky’s work connects institutions, creators and policymakers →](/stories/yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power)\n",
        "searchText": " The important update  In her September 5 video, Sabine Hossenfelder said an AI-risk organization offered sponsorship but sought to specify the topic, sentences and references. She says she refused. The offeror was unnamed in that passage; she discussed ControlAI separately.  Her video, around 2:03  \n On September 8,  ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved . Andrea Miotti and Max Winga’s response disputes her description and says the negotiations went through her manager.  ControlAI’s response  \n That moves the investigation forward. We can attach the approach to an organization that publicly acknowledges it. We cannot settle the competing descriptions without the correspondence. \n The point they dispute  Hossenfelder describes attempted control over what she would say. ControlAI describes standard sponsorship conditions, editorial input over the ad, and generally nonbinding review of the main script. Its stated conditions include no AI-company endorsement and a required citation to one of two risk statements. It says sponsorship is disclosed.  ControlAI’s partnership policy and account  \n A sponsor can influence a message without writing every sentence. Choosing the topic, choosing sympathetic creators, selecting the required authority and deciding what production to fund can all shape what reaches the public. Those are mechanisms worth examining even when the speaker sincerely agrees and a sponsorship label is visible. \n The narrower factual question is what happened in this negotiation. A policy published afterward cannot substitute for the exchanged messages. Equally, a disagreement about requested changes does not establish a secret completed payment. \n  Explore this connection map   Why this belongs in the power map  ControlAI connects creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. It names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner; no amount is provided.  The organization’s account  \n This matters because a video can perform two jobs: explain a technical concern and recruit support for a political remedy. Viewers should be able to distinguish the speaker’s judgment, the sponsor’s requirements and the action being requested. “Sponsored” tells us money is involved. It does not, on its own, explain the editorial arrangement. \n This is also why we distinguish influence from command. The evidence supports an organized campaign and a disputed approach. It does not establish that all creators covering AI risk share a sponsor, that Hossenfelder accepted this arrangement, or that every warning is insincere. \n The evidence that would settle more  The useful next records are ordinary business documents: the initial offer, proposed agreement, submitted script, requested revisions, cancellation terms and the exchange through the manager. With dates and both sides represented, these could establish what was required, what was optional and where the accounts diverge. Their absence is a gap, not a confession. \n RED THREADS began with the question of who was influencing the influencers. Here we now have a named participant. The next question is what that participant was buying—and what the audience could see. \n  Read how Yudkowsky’s work connects institutions, creators and policymakers →  \n",
        "category": "AI & money",
        "kind": "article",
        "date": "2026-09-12",
        "sources": [],
        "sections": []
      },
      {
        "id": "w35-rational-animations-notes",
        "title": "Rational Animations: writers, adaptations and sponsors",
        "description": "Six primary sources distinguish adaptation, contact, grants and sponsored advocacy.",
        "html": "<h2>Finding\nThe evidence establishes an intellectual/adaptation relationship, a historical invitation to collaborate directly, a MIRI recommendation, institutional seed funding and a separate ControlAI sponsorship. It does not establish that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel's AI-risk material, owns it, controls its editorial decisions, or personally finances it. \"Anti-AI\" is also not a defined, audited subset of its output. Six decisive primary sources follow.</h2><h2>1. Yudkowsky adaptations and a direct production invitation\nPrimary: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team\nRelevant operator comments: Writer, October 11-13, 2023. Direct comment URL: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team?commentId=mbcGNee7xm6rBfDQP\nOriginal full page read; comment-specific URL errored. Dates also visible on GreaterWrong's mirror of the same thread.</h2><p>The channel operator says he met Yudkowsky at Manifest, invited him into the production Discord, and proposed turning his contributions to its writers into succinct animated explanations. He offered the same opportunity to other safety organizations and MIRI staff. Gretta Duleba requested an invitation; he subsequently said it had been sent. This is evidence of an offered collaboration channel, not a completed commissioning contract.</p><p>The operator identifies The Power of Intelligence and Sorting Pebbles as unchanged adaptations; The Parable of the Dagger as lightly edited; and The Hidden Complexity of Wishes as adapted with Yudkowsky's approval. He separately attributes an extinction/century explainer mainly to Matthew Barnett and the grabby-aliens explainer to himself.</p><p>In this same thread Duleba describes public concern as a route toward restrictions on frontier development and GPU distribution. Attribute that policy rationale to MIRI, not automatically to every animation.</p><h2>2. Current named writing and editorial staff\nPrimary interview: https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think\nPublished April 25, 2026; Eneasz Brodski publication, Ben Pace interviewing Alice Liu. Interview introduction and discussion following the question about joining Rational Animations.</h2><p>Liu is introduced as lead scriptwriter. She says she won a 2022 writing contest, joined part-time in January 2023, and became full-time in February 2025. She estimates roughly twelve scripts, several still in production. She describes Robert Miles as narrator and deeply involved editor who challenges statements he disagrees with; the CEO and other part-time writers also participate. Justin Kuiper is named as involved. She identifies an infohazards video as her work.</p><p>This is a participant account of a staffed production process, not an independent payroll audit or a complete authorship census. It establishes other actual writers and editorial input; it cannot by itself determine the fraction of AI-risk scripts attributable to any one person.</p><h2>3. ControlAI's named sponsorship and its terms\nPrimary: https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\nAndrea Miotti and Max Winga, September 8, 2026. Sections ControlAI's Work / Our Partnerships.\nLinked sponsored example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI (\"What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?\"). Sponsor page fully read; YouTube retrieval exposed only minimal metadata.</h2><p>ControlAI explicitly names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Its account describes buying 60-90-second ad segments, agreeing topics in advance, and ordinarily requiring a nonbinding script review. It says creators control the main content, subject to conditions against endorsing AI companies and requiring a citation to one of two expert-risk statements. The ad's call to action directs viewers to contact lawmakers. No amount paid to Rational Animations is supplied.</p><p>This is the sponsor's public admission and description of its process, not an inspected individual contract. It supports a paid-sponsorship relationship and intended political mobilization; it does not establish who wrote the whole video, hidden sponsorship, MIRI payment, or Yudkowsky control.</p><h2>4. Institutional seed funding with explicit audience-building rationale\nPrimary fund-manager report: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations\nPublished June 3, 2021. Section YouTube channel Rational Animations ($30,000), under Buck Shlegeris's grant reports.</h2><p>EA Infrastructure Fund reports a $30,000 award to the newly created channel. The report calls this the Q1 2021 round, states April 2021 payout, and also frames aggregate totals as conditional on grantees accepting full awards. Preserve that report-level qualification rather than calling this a bank receipt.</p><p>The rationale explicitly compares the channel with Robert Miles's: attracting awareness of AI safety, deepening engagement among people already exposed, and helping involved audiences understand developments. This establishes a funder's declared theory of impact. It predates the 2026 ASI-ban campaign; do not retroactively label it funding for that exact campaign.</p><h2>5. MIRI recommends Rational Animations\nPrimary: https://intelligence.org/take-action/\nCurrent page inspected September 12, 2026; Careers and Donation Targets, plus communication advice.</h2><p>MIRI lists Rational Animations among organizations recommended for careers/donations and as examples of work it wants more of. The list expressly does not imply full mutual agreement. It supports a public recommendation, not a MIRI grant or governance relationship.</p><p>The same page argues public awareness can create policy demand for an international off-switch. It also expressly calls for candor and honesty and warns against manipulative conduct. A claim that MIRI publicly licenses deception would misrepresent this source; whether conduct matches policy is a separate evidentiary question.</p><h2>6. Rational Animations' own identity\nPrimary: https://www.rationalanimations.com/about-us\nUndated current page inspected September 12, 2026.</h2><p>The organization describes an international remote team of about forty, a particular focus on AI safety/alignment, and animation/writing services. Its partner-logo section claims work with Sentience Institute, Blue Dot Impact, Manifold Markets, GiveDirectly, Metaculus, Charter Cities Institute and Forethought Foundation. These are claimed work relationships; the page does not specify whether each was a sponsor, commissioner, collaborator or donor. Do not encode them all as funders.</p><h2>Grant leads not reconciled for publication\nThe legacy Good Ventures search index still displays video-animation-cost awards of $1,000,000 (May 2023) and $1,495,355 (February 2024):\nhttps://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all\nhttps://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/33/?limit=10000\nOpening now redirects to https://goodventures.org/our-giving/ without those entries. Third-party grantmaking.ai displays $2,095,355 for one grant; other commentary quotes a different 2024 total. These may reflect amendments, different grantmakers or stale records; not resolved here. Do not sum or interchange them. Legacy Open Philanthropy grant pages did not provide usable current records in this pass. The current Coefficient Giving home page explicitly identifies itself as the renamed Open Philanthropy, but that does not reconcile these transactions.</h2><p>No direct MIRI-to-Rational-Animations cash grant was established. No complete ledger, video-by-video credit census or private arrangement was inspected. A useful article formulation is that the channel translates parts of Yudkowsky's intellectual corpus into popular video, has documented contact with MIRI's communications effort, and separately participates in ControlAI's sponsored advocacy. Majority authorship remains unproven.\n</p>",
        "markdown": "# Rational Animations, Yudkowsky and the advocacy network\nChecked 2026-09-12. Bounded primary-source inquiry. No Site or corpus edits.\n\n## Finding\nThe evidence establishes an intellectual/adaptation relationship, a historical invitation to collaborate directly, a MIRI recommendation, institutional seed funding and a separate ControlAI sponsorship. It does not establish that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel's AI-risk material, owns it, controls its editorial decisions, or personally finances it. \"Anti-AI\" is also not a defined, audited subset of its output. Six decisive primary sources follow.\n\n## 1. Yudkowsky adaptations and a direct production invitation\nPrimary: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team\nRelevant operator comments: Writer, October 11-13, 2023. Direct comment URL: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team?commentId=mbcGNee7xm6rBfDQP\nOriginal full page read; comment-specific URL errored. Dates also visible on GreaterWrong's mirror of the same thread.\n\nThe channel operator says he met Yudkowsky at Manifest, invited him into the production Discord, and proposed turning his contributions to its writers into succinct animated explanations. He offered the same opportunity to other safety organizations and MIRI staff. Gretta Duleba requested an invitation; he subsequently said it had been sent. This is evidence of an offered collaboration channel, not a completed commissioning contract.\n\nThe operator identifies The Power of Intelligence and Sorting Pebbles as unchanged adaptations; The Parable of the Dagger as lightly edited; and The Hidden Complexity of Wishes as adapted with Yudkowsky's approval. He separately attributes an extinction/century explainer mainly to Matthew Barnett and the grabby-aliens explainer to himself.\n\nIn this same thread Duleba describes public concern as a route toward restrictions on frontier development and GPU distribution. Attribute that policy rationale to MIRI, not automatically to every animation.\n\n## 2. Current named writing and editorial staff\nPrimary interview: https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think\nPublished April 25, 2026; Eneasz Brodski publication, Ben Pace interviewing Alice Liu. Interview introduction and discussion following the question about joining Rational Animations.\n\nLiu is introduced as lead scriptwriter. She says she won a 2022 writing contest, joined part-time in January 2023, and became full-time in February 2025. She estimates roughly twelve scripts, several still in production. She describes Robert Miles as narrator and deeply involved editor who challenges statements he disagrees with; the CEO and other part-time writers also participate. Justin Kuiper is named as involved. She identifies an infohazards video as her work.\n\nThis is a participant account of a staffed production process, not an independent payroll audit or a complete authorship census. It establishes other actual writers and editorial input; it cannot by itself determine the fraction of AI-risk scripts attributable to any one person.\n\n## 3. ControlAI's named sponsorship and its terms\nPrimary: https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\nAndrea Miotti and Max Winga, September 8, 2026. Sections ControlAI's Work / Our Partnerships.\nLinked sponsored example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI (\"What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?\"). Sponsor page fully read; YouTube retrieval exposed only minimal metadata.\n\nControlAI explicitly names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Its account describes buying 60-90-second ad segments, agreeing topics in advance, and ordinarily requiring a nonbinding script review. It says creators control the main content, subject to conditions against endorsing AI companies and requiring a citation to one of two expert-risk statements. The ad's call to action directs viewers to contact lawmakers. No amount paid to Rational Animations is supplied.\n\nThis is the sponsor's public admission and description of its process, not an inspected individual contract. It supports a paid-sponsorship relationship and intended political mobilization; it does not establish who wrote the whole video, hidden sponsorship, MIRI payment, or Yudkowsky control.\n\n## 4. Institutional seed funding with explicit audience-building rationale\nPrimary fund-manager report: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations\nPublished June 3, 2021. Section YouTube channel Rational Animations ($30,000), under Buck Shlegeris's grant reports.\n\nEA Infrastructure Fund reports a $30,000 award to the newly created channel. The report calls this the Q1 2021 round, states April 2021 payout, and also frames aggregate totals as conditional on grantees accepting full awards. Preserve that report-level qualification rather than calling this a bank receipt.\n\nThe rationale explicitly compares the channel with Robert Miles's: attracting awareness of AI safety, deepening engagement among people already exposed, and helping involved audiences understand developments. This establishes a funder's declared theory of impact. It predates the 2026 ASI-ban campaign; do not retroactively label it funding for that exact campaign.\n\n## 5. MIRI recommends Rational Animations\nPrimary: https://intelligence.org/take-action/\nCurrent page inspected September 12, 2026; Careers and Donation Targets, plus communication advice.\n\nMIRI lists Rational Animations among organizations recommended for careers/donations and as examples of work it wants more of. The list expressly does not imply full mutual agreement. It supports a public recommendation, not a MIRI grant or governance relationship.\n\nThe same page argues public awareness can create policy demand for an international off-switch. It also expressly calls for candor and honesty and warns against manipulative conduct. A claim that MIRI publicly licenses deception would misrepresent this source; whether conduct matches policy is a separate evidentiary question.\n\n## 6. Rational Animations' own identity\nPrimary: https://www.rationalanimations.com/about-us\nUndated current page inspected September 12, 2026.\n\nThe organization describes an international remote team of about forty, a particular focus on AI safety/alignment, and animation/writing services. Its partner-logo section claims work with Sentience Institute, Blue Dot Impact, Manifold Markets, GiveDirectly, Metaculus, Charter Cities Institute and Forethought Foundation. These are claimed work relationships; the page does not specify whether each was a sponsor, commissioner, collaborator or donor. Do not encode them all as funders.\n\n## Grant leads not reconciled for publication\nThe legacy Good Ventures search index still displays video-animation-cost awards of $1,000,000 (May 2023) and $1,495,355 (February 2024):\nhttps://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all\nhttps://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/33/?limit=10000\nOpening now redirects to https://goodventures.org/our-giving/ without those entries. Third-party grantmaking.ai displays $2,095,355 for one grant; other commentary quotes a different 2024 total. These may reflect amendments, different grantmakers or stale records; not resolved here. Do not sum or interchange them. Legacy Open Philanthropy grant pages did not provide usable current records in this pass. The current Coefficient Giving home page explicitly identifies itself as the renamed Open Philanthropy, but that does not reconcile these transactions.\n\nNo direct MIRI-to-Rational-Animations cash grant was established. No complete ledger, video-by-video credit census or private arrangement was inspected. A useful article formulation is that the channel translates parts of Yudkowsky's intellectual corpus into popular video, has documented contact with MIRI's communications effort, and separately participates in ControlAI's sponsored advocacy. Majority authorship remains unproven.\n",
        "searchText": " Finding\nThe evidence establishes an intellectual/adaptation relationship, a historical invitation to collaborate directly, a MIRI recommendation, institutional seed funding and a separate ControlAI sponsorship. It does not establish that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel's AI-risk material, owns it, controls its editorial decisions, or personally finances it. \"Anti-AI\" is also not a defined, audited subset of its output. Six decisive primary sources follow.  1. Yudkowsky adaptations and a direct production invitation\nPrimary: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team\nRelevant operator comments: Writer, October 11-13, 2023. Direct comment URL: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team?commentId=mbcGNee7xm6rBfDQP\nOriginal full page read; comment-specific URL errored. Dates also visible on GreaterWrong's mirror of the same thread.  The channel operator says he met Yudkowsky at Manifest, invited him into the production Discord, and proposed turning his contributions to its writers into succinct animated explanations. He offered the same opportunity to other safety organizations and MIRI staff. Gretta Duleba requested an invitation; he subsequently said it had been sent. This is evidence of an offered collaboration channel, not a completed commissioning contract.  The operator identifies The Power of Intelligence and Sorting Pebbles as unchanged adaptations; The Parable of the Dagger as lightly edited; and The Hidden Complexity of Wishes as adapted with Yudkowsky's approval. He separately attributes an extinction/century explainer mainly to Matthew Barnett and the grabby-aliens explainer to himself.  In this same thread Duleba describes public concern as a route toward restrictions on frontier development and GPU distribution. Attribute that policy rationale to MIRI, not automatically to every animation.  2. Current named writing and editorial staff\nPrimary interview: https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think\nPublished April 25, 2026; Eneasz Brodski publication, Ben Pace interviewing Alice Liu. Interview introduction and discussion following the question about joining Rational Animations.  Liu is introduced as lead scriptwriter. She says she won a 2022 writing contest, joined part-time in January 2023, and became full-time in February 2025. She estimates roughly twelve scripts, several still in production. She describes Robert Miles as narrator and deeply involved editor who challenges statements he disagrees with; the CEO and other part-time writers also participate. Justin Kuiper is named as involved. She identifies an infohazards video as her work.  This is a participant account of a staffed production process, not an independent payroll audit or a complete authorship census. It establishes other actual writers and editorial input; it cannot by itself determine the fraction of AI-risk scripts attributable to any one person.  3. ControlAI's named sponsorship and its terms\nPrimary: https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\nAndrea Miotti and Max Winga, September 8, 2026. Sections ControlAI's Work / Our Partnerships.\nLinked sponsored example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bnxF9YfyFI (\"What happens if AI just keeps getting smarter?\"). Sponsor page fully read; YouTube retrieval exposed only minimal metadata.  ControlAI explicitly names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Its account describes buying 60-90-second ad segments, agreeing topics in advance, and ordinarily requiring a nonbinding script review. It says creators control the main content, subject to conditions against endorsing AI companies and requiring a citation to one of two expert-risk statements. The ad's call to action directs viewers to contact lawmakers. No amount paid to Rational Animations is supplied.  This is the sponsor's public admission and description of its process, not an inspected individual contract. It supports a paid-sponsorship relationship and intended political mobilization; it does not establish who wrote the whole video, hidden sponsorship, MIRI payment, or Yudkowsky control.  4. Institutional seed funding with explicit audience-building rationale\nPrimary fund-manager report: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations\nPublished June 3, 2021. Section YouTube channel Rational Animations ($30,000), under Buck Shlegeris's grant reports.  EA Infrastructure Fund reports a $30,000 award to the newly created channel. The report calls this the Q1 2021 round, states April 2021 payout, and also frames aggregate totals as conditional on grantees accepting full awards. Preserve that report-level qualification rather than calling this a bank receipt.  The rationale explicitly compares the channel with Robert Miles's: attracting awareness of AI safety, deepening engagement among people already exposed, and helping involved audiences understand developments. This establishes a funder's declared theory of impact. It predates the 2026 ASI-ban campaign; do not retroactively label it funding for that exact campaign.  5. MIRI recommends Rational Animations\nPrimary: https://intelligence.org/take-action/\nCurrent page inspected September 12, 2026; Careers and Donation Targets, plus communication advice.  MIRI lists Rational Animations among organizations recommended for careers/donations and as examples of work it wants more of. The list expressly does not imply full mutual agreement. It supports a public recommendation, not a MIRI grant or governance relationship.  The same page argues public awareness can create policy demand for an international off-switch. It also expressly calls for candor and honesty and warns against manipulative conduct. A claim that MIRI publicly licenses deception would misrepresent this source; whether conduct matches policy is a separate evidentiary question.  6. Rational Animations' own identity\nPrimary: https://www.rationalanimations.com/about-us\nUndated current page inspected September 12, 2026.  The organization describes an international remote team of about forty, a particular focus on AI safety/alignment, and animation/writing services. Its partner-logo section claims work with Sentience Institute, Blue Dot Impact, Manifold Markets, GiveDirectly, Metaculus, Charter Cities Institute and Forethought Foundation. These are claimed work relationships; the page does not specify whether each was a sponsor, commissioner, collaborator or donor. Do not encode them all as funders.  Grant leads not reconciled for publication\nThe legacy Good Ventures search index still displays video-animation-cost awards of $1,000,000 (May 2023) and $1,495,355 (February 2024):\nhttps://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/109/?limit=all\nhttps://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants-database/page/33/?limit=10000\nOpening now redirects to https://goodventures.org/our-giving/ without those entries. Third-party grantmaking.ai displays $2,095,355 for one grant; other commentary quotes a different 2024 total. These may reflect amendments, different grantmakers or stale records; not resolved here. Do not sum or interchange them. Legacy Open Philanthropy grant pages did not provide usable current records in this pass. The current Coefficient Giving home page explicitly identifies itself as the renamed Open Philanthropy, but that does not reconcile these transactions.  No direct MIRI-to-Rational-Animations cash grant was established. No complete ledger, video-by-video credit census or private arrangement was inspected. A useful article formulation is that the channel translates parts of Yudkowsky's intellectual corpus into popular video, has documented contact with MIRI's communications effort, and separately participates in ControlAI's sponsored advocacy. Majority authorship remains unproven.\n ",
        "category": "AI & money",
        "kind": "research",
        "date": "2026-09-12",
        "sources": [],
        "sections": []
      },
      {
        "id": "w35-yudkowsky-sources",
        "title": "Yudkowsky: institutional and financial source notes",
        "description": "Dated primary records and the limits of what they establish.",
        "html": "<p>Checked 12 September 2026. Public research only. Sources are institutional accounts or authored policy statements, with their limits retained.</p><p>MIRI current roles: https://intelligence.org/team/ . Yudkowsky is listed under Leadership and Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO; Nate Soares is President. Earlier Singularity Institute name: https://intelligence.org/transparency/ . These are institutional roles, not proof of personal control over all linked organizations.</p><p>Contributor history: https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/ . The displayed update is 30 April 2026. Credits are cumulative and include matching leveraged; the recent category means some support in the preceding five years. Thiel and Alameda appear under past contributors. Do not allocate these totals to any specific current campaign.</p><p>Primary donation details: https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/ . Anonymous donor's MKR liquidation and spending limits are a distinct transaction; the issuer of the token was not named as the donor. Vitalik's separate ETH gift is included in historical support rather than added again to lifetime credits.</p><p>Correction essential to funding genealogy: https://intelligence.org/2020/04/27/miris-largest-grant-to-date/ . The proposed Ben Delo partnership was cancelled and other funders supplied the grant. Do not preserve a cancelled proposal as a completed payment.</p><p>Policy record: https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/ is a 2023 authored position advocating international restrictions on large AI training and willingness to enforce them against infrastructure, including military action. It does not establish enacted powers or a policy of executing researchers. The later MIRI treaty is a separate document/version; campaign notes contain its safeguards and operational limitations.</p><p>Advocacy adoption: https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign promotes Yudkowsky/Soares's book. https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai invokes Yudkowsky's explanation of inferential distance. These support transmission of arguments and methods, not a funding or command edge.</p><p>Strategic differences: https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan (20 April 2026) praises the book while explaining ControlAI's more repeatable campaign operations. https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip criticizes some evaluator and elite-placement strategies and notes Yudkowsky's shift toward public awareness. Institutional overlap does not erase these strategic differences.</p><p>Direct access: https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/ explicitly records Yudkowsky and Soares briefing Sanders; links the official video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oS35oWWl28 . Official upload metadata dates that video 4 March 2026. The full video was not watched in this pass. This supports briefing access, not authorship of later legislation.</p><p>Local scope: the inspected portable Editorial v2 dataset lacks a named Yudkowsky/MIRI entity profile, while local media-surge research contains MIRI treaty analysis. Correctly record this as an integration gap in that snapshot, not as an absence from all research.</p><p>Independent editorial challenge upheld the keystone assessment within the AI-risk/prohibition network, with boundaries on historical donor attribution, operational leadership, policymaker access versus drafting, and intellectual influence versus organizational control.\n</p>",
        "markdown": "# Additional source notes\n\nChecked 12 September 2026. Public research only. Sources are institutional accounts or authored policy statements, with their limits retained.\n\nMIRI current roles: https://intelligence.org/team/ . Yudkowsky is listed under Leadership and Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO; Nate Soares is President. Earlier Singularity Institute name: https://intelligence.org/transparency/ . These are institutional roles, not proof of personal control over all linked organizations.\n\nContributor history: https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/ . The displayed update is 30 April 2026. Credits are cumulative and include matching leveraged; the recent category means some support in the preceding five years. Thiel and Alameda appear under past contributors. Do not allocate these totals to any specific current campaign.\n\nPrimary donation details: https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/ . Anonymous donor's MKR liquidation and spending limits are a distinct transaction; the issuer of the token was not named as the donor. Vitalik's separate ETH gift is included in historical support rather than added again to lifetime credits.\n\nCorrection essential to funding genealogy: https://intelligence.org/2020/04/27/miris-largest-grant-to-date/ . The proposed Ben Delo partnership was cancelled and other funders supplied the grant. Do not preserve a cancelled proposal as a completed payment.\n\nPolicy record: https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/ is a 2023 authored position advocating international restrictions on large AI training and willingness to enforce them against infrastructure, including military action. It does not establish enacted powers or a policy of executing researchers. The later MIRI treaty is a separate document/version; campaign notes contain its safeguards and operational limitations.\n\nAdvocacy adoption: https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign promotes Yudkowsky/Soares's book. https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai invokes Yudkowsky's explanation of inferential distance. These support transmission of arguments and methods, not a funding or command edge.\n\nStrategic differences: https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan (20 April 2026) praises the book while explaining ControlAI's more repeatable campaign operations. https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip criticizes some evaluator and elite-placement strategies and notes Yudkowsky's shift toward public awareness. Institutional overlap does not erase these strategic differences.\n\nDirect access: https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/ explicitly records Yudkowsky and Soares briefing Sanders; links the official video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oS35oWWl28 . Official upload metadata dates that video 4 March 2026. The full video was not watched in this pass. This supports briefing access, not authorship of later legislation.\n\nLocal scope: the inspected portable Editorial v2 dataset lacks a named Yudkowsky/MIRI entity profile, while local media-surge research contains MIRI treaty analysis. Correctly record this as an integration gap in that snapshot, not as an absence from all research.\n\nIndependent editorial challenge upheld the keystone assessment within the AI-risk/prohibition network, with boundaries on historical donor attribution, operational leadership, policymaker access versus drafting, and intellectual influence versus organizational control.\n",
        "searchText": " Checked 12 September 2026. Public research only. Sources are institutional accounts or authored policy statements, with their limits retained.  MIRI current roles: https://intelligence.org/team/ . Yudkowsky is listed under Leadership and Board. Malo Bourgon is CEO; Nate Soares is President. Earlier Singularity Institute name: https://intelligence.org/transparency/ . These are institutional roles, not proof of personal control over all linked organizations.  Contributor history: https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/ . The displayed update is 30 April 2026. Credits are cumulative and include matching leveraged; the recent category means some support in the preceding five years. Thiel and Alameda appear under past contributors. Do not allocate these totals to any specific current campaign.  Primary donation details: https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/ . Anonymous donor's MKR liquidation and spending limits are a distinct transaction; the issuer of the token was not named as the donor. Vitalik's separate ETH gift is included in historical support rather than added again to lifetime credits.  Correction essential to funding genealogy: https://intelligence.org/2020/04/27/miris-largest-grant-to-date/ . The proposed Ben Delo partnership was cancelled and other funders supplied the grant. Do not preserve a cancelled proposal as a completed payment.  Policy record: https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/ is a 2023 authored position advocating international restrictions on large AI training and willingness to enforce them against infrastructure, including military action. It does not establish enacted powers or a policy of executing researchers. The later MIRI treaty is a separate document/version; campaign notes contain its safeguards and operational limitations.  Advocacy adoption: https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign promotes Yudkowsky/Soares's book. https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai invokes Yudkowsky's explanation of inferential distance. These support transmission of arguments and methods, not a funding or command edge.  Strategic differences: https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan (20 April 2026) praises the book while explaining ControlAI's more repeatable campaign operations. https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip criticizes some evaluator and elite-placement strategies and notes Yudkowsky's shift toward public awareness. Institutional overlap does not erase these strategic differences.  Direct access: https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/ explicitly records Yudkowsky and Soares briefing Sanders; links the official video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oS35oWWl28 . Official upload metadata dates that video 4 March 2026. The full video was not watched in this pass. This supports briefing access, not authorship of later legislation.  Local scope: the inspected portable Editorial v2 dataset lacks a named Yudkowsky/MIRI entity profile, while local media-surge research contains MIRI treaty analysis. Correctly record this as an integration gap in that snapshot, not as an absence from all research.  Independent editorial challenge upheld the keystone assessment within the AI-risk/prohibition network, with boundaries on historical donor attribution, operational leadership, policymaker access versus drafting, and intellectual influence versus organizational control.\n ",
        "category": "AI & money",
        "kind": "research",
        "date": "2026-09-12",
        "sources": [],
        "sections": []
      },
      {
        "id": "w35-rohan-paul-findings",
        "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and narrative distribution",
        "description": "Commercial placements and public posts, with counterevidence to an assumed single-campaign role.",
        "html": "<p>Research through 12 September 2026. Scope: @rohanpaul_ai, Rohan's Bytes and rohan-paul.com. This is a research supplement, not a deployed website edition.</p><h2>Assessment</h2><p>Paul belongs in the map as a commercially sponsored AI publisher and a distributor of competing narratives about AI progress, risk and regulation. The inspected record establishes particular sponsor placements and particular acts of amplification. It does not establish a ControlAI/FLI commission, government sponsorship, prohibition-campaign membership or backstage coordination.</p><p>That distinction helps explain the network rather than diminishing his relevance. An advocacy organization does not need to employ every publisher who circulates its favored stories. A widely read technical curator can carry a warning beyond the audience that already follows safety organizations. Paul also circulates arguments favoring accessible AI and opposing concentration. His role is best understood through what he publishes and sells, without assigning him exclusive allegiance to one camp.</p><p>His <a href=\"https://github.com/rohan-paul\">GitHub profile</a> cross-links the newsletter, X account and LinkedIn identity and presents him as a machine-learning engineer and newsletter founder/writer. It includes public fine-tuning, implementation and tutorial repositories. The profile's own audience numbers are self-reported, not verified delivery or reach. This is not the IIT Delhi robotics professor of the same name.</p><h2>The current warning cycle</h2><p>On <a href=\"https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069\">9 September he recirculated the WSJ report on Jacob Coxon</a>, attributing the warning about potentially uncontrollable self-improvement to Coxon. On <a href=\"https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195\">10 September he posted an NBC interview excerpt</a>. He also <a href=\"https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018\">summarized Anthropic's alignment assessment on 9 September</a>.</p><p>X's public platform embeds establish his authorship, the dates and the visible openings. They truncate the long posts; the captures cannot establish every sentence, a later disclosure or the complete framing. Embedded videos were not watched in this pass. The warranted relation is reporting/quotation/amplification, not commission or adoption of every claim.</p><p>A secondary roundup groups him with ControlAI and other accounts covering Coxon. This was useful for finding his original post, but a topical cluster is not a coordination record. Multiple publications repeating the same interview are also not multiple independent witnesses for the interviewee's underlying prediction.</p><h2>The commercial relationships we can actually name</h2><p>Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with\">Pika, 28 February</a>, <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe\">Toyo, 11 July</a>, <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of\">Limestone Digital, 24 July</a>, <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b\">Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August</a>, and <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published\">TARS Robotics, 22 August</a>. These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.</p><p>The sponsor sections show how the publication monetizes access to its audience. They do not reveal amounts, payment receipts, legal contracting entities, intermediaries or rights over neighboring editorial coverage. Internal edition dates differ by one day from the displayed publication dates for Toyo, Limestone and TARS; both are retained in source notes.</p><p>This is the money mechanism supported now: named vendors occupy clearly labeled promotional space in his AI publication. It cannot be converted into a finding that someone paid him to promote a particular AI law. Former Deutsche Bank, HSBC and AlphaSights roles appear in derivative biographies, but primary employment details were not readable in this pass. They remain leads, and even confirmed former employment would not establish present institutional direction.</p><h2>Evidence against a simple prohibition-campaign classification</h2><p>His <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b\">11 August edition</a> combines Sanders's pause demand with favorable discussion of a local model and quotations from Zuckerberg's argument for widely available superintelligence. It also carries the Uncensored AI and Domus sponsor sections. The Sanders subsection is introduced as quotations from his letter, not Paul's own demand.</p><p>On <a href=\"https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996\">17 August Paul called a David Sacks post a must-read</a>. The short original embed includes Sacks's warning about the United States becoming an expensive closed-model island. This is positive recommendation of an anti-centralization argument; it does not imply agreement with all of Sacks's politics or prove independence from every conceivable sponsor.</p><p>His <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of\">24 July sandbox-escape coverage</a> includes operational qualifications: reduced refusals/classifiers for evaluation and the reported absence of public model/dataset modification. That qualification matters when characterizing his coverage. We have assessed what he published, not independently re-audited every underlying technical or legal claim.</p><h2>A concrete amplification problem</h2><p>There is a notable headline/body discrepancy in his <a href=\"https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-stops-reinforcement-learning\">18 August edition</a>. The headline states that Astra reached the Critical cybersecurity threshold. The body says OpenAI could not rule out that threshold and separates Astra from the earlier Hugging Face incident.</p><p>The headline is more certain than the body. A reader seeing only a feed card receives a stronger claim than a reader who opens the article. That is an observable point where amplification changes the information. This single example warrants examination of headline compression; it does not establish deliberate deception or a systematic error rate.</p><h2>Forest view</h2><p>The record suggests a publication operating where commercial technology promotion, technical education, news selection and political debate meet. Capability breakthroughs and alarming incidents can both attract the same AI-interested readers. Audience growth is a plausible common incentive across opposing stories; we do not have Paul's revenue breakdown or editorial deliberations to establish his motive.</p><p>The useful structural paths are researcher/lab/mainstream report -&gt; Paul -&gt; X/newsletter audience, alongside named vendor -&gt; disclosed sponsor placement -&gt; that publication's audience. No payment or control edge from the AI-prohibition organizations is established. His ability to reach readers outside a dedicated safety audience is a plausible reason he matters, not a measured conversion result or a centrality ranking.</p><h2>Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine</h2><p>Separately, <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI's 8 September post, by Andrea Miotti and Max Winga</a>, says it was the organization negotiating with Hossenfelder and disputes her account. The supplied Sabine transcript itself left her offeror unnamed while separately naming ControlAI as sponsoring other creators. The correct update is: ControlAI subsequently self-identified as the organization involved. Its post does not publish the underlying emails or contracts, and Paul is not named.</p><p>ControlAI reports nine paid and nine unpaid videos, around 1,000 creators contacted and more than 60 briefed. Those are its own campaign figures. The post documents its stated sponsorship process, including contracts, review, citations and disclosure; it does not demonstrate Paul's participation. See adjacent-controlai-creator-outreach.md for the competing accounts and source limits.</p><h2>What would change this assessment</h2><p>The most useful new evidence would be a specific original campaign disclosure, a representation/media-kit record, a named creator roster, or briefing/contract correspondence that connects Paul to a defined policy campaign. Complete original long posts would help distinguish extended commentary, disclosure and endorsement beyond the available embeds. Additional pages merely listing him near ControlAI or Tegmark add little.</p><p>Targeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.</p><h2>Preserved material</h2><p>commercial-and-identity.md contains six decisive identity/commercial sources and career leads. narrative-and-policy.md contains eight original-author records, counterevidence and exact access limits. narrative-captures contains four platform embed JSON captures and four publisher HTML captures, with acquisition timestamps. case.json preserves typed case-local relationships. These files have not been imported into or published on the live site.\n</p>",
        "markdown": "# Rohan Paul: where he fits in RED THREADS\n\nResearch through 12 September 2026. Scope: @rohanpaul_ai, Rohan's Bytes and rohan-paul.com. This is a research supplement, not a deployed website edition.\n\n## Assessment\n\nPaul belongs in the map as a commercially sponsored AI publisher and a distributor of competing narratives about AI progress, risk and regulation. The inspected record establishes particular sponsor placements and particular acts of amplification. It does not establish a ControlAI/FLI commission, government sponsorship, prohibition-campaign membership or backstage coordination.\n\nThat distinction helps explain the network rather than diminishing his relevance. An advocacy organization does not need to employ every publisher who circulates its favored stories. A widely read technical curator can carry a warning beyond the audience that already follows safety organizations. Paul also circulates arguments favoring accessible AI and opposing concentration. His role is best understood through what he publishes and sells, without assigning him exclusive allegiance to one camp.\n\nHis [GitHub profile](https://github.com/rohan-paul) cross-links the newsletter, X account and LinkedIn identity and presents him as a machine-learning engineer and newsletter founder/writer. It includes public fine-tuning, implementation and tutorial repositories. The profile's own audience numbers are self-reported, not verified delivery or reach. This is not the IIT Delhi robotics professor of the same name.\n\n## The current warning cycle\n\nOn [9 September he recirculated the WSJ report on Jacob Coxon](https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097486953310831069), attributing the warning about potentially uncontrollable self-improvement to Coxon. On [10 September he posted an NBC interview excerpt](https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2098117427641090195). He also [summarized Anthropic's alignment assessment on 9 September](https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2097776787115901018).\n\nX's public platform embeds establish his authorship, the dates and the visible openings. They truncate the long posts; the captures cannot establish every sentence, a later disclosure or the complete framing. Embedded videos were not watched in this pass. The warranted relation is reporting/quotation/amplification, not commission or adoption of every claim.\n\nA secondary roundup groups him with ControlAI and other accounts covering Coxon. This was useful for finding his original post, but a topical cluster is not a coordination record. Multiple publications repeating the same interview are also not multiple independent witnesses for the interviewee's underlying prediction.\n\n## The commercial relationships we can actually name\n\nSpecific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for [Pika, 28 February](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-sweeps-in-to-ink-deal-with), [Toyo, 11 July](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/gpt-56-beats-fable-5-by-on-deepswe), [Limestone Digital, 24 July](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of), [Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b), and [TARS Robotics, 22 August](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/study-finds-1-in-3-web-pages-published). These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.\n\nThe sponsor sections show how the publication monetizes access to its audience. They do not reveal amounts, payment receipts, legal contracting entities, intermediaries or rights over neighboring editorial coverage. Internal edition dates differ by one day from the displayed publication dates for Toyo, Limestone and TARS; both are retained in source notes.\n\nThis is the money mechanism supported now: named vendors occupy clearly labeled promotional space in his AI publication. It cannot be converted into a finding that someone paid him to promote a particular AI law. Former Deutsche Bank, HSBC and AlphaSights roles appear in derivative biographies, but primary employment details were not readable in this pass. They remain leads, and even confirmed former employment would not establish present institutional direction.\n\n## Evidence against a simple prohibition-campaign classification\n\nHis [11 August edition](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/meta-released-muse-glimmer-a-30b) combines Sanders's pause demand with favorable discussion of a local model and quotations from Zuckerberg's argument for widely available superintelligence. It also carries the Uncensored AI and Domus sponsor sections. The Sanders subsection is introduced as quotations from his letter, not Paul's own demand.\n\nOn [17 August Paul called a David Sacks post a must-read](https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2089350061453168996). The short original embed includes Sacks's warning about the United States becoming an expensive closed-model island. This is positive recommendation of an anti-centralization argument; it does not imply agreement with all of Sacks's politics or prove independence from every conceivable sponsor.\n\nHis [24 July sandbox-escape coverage](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openais-own-ai-models-broke-out-of) includes operational qualifications: reduced refusals/classifiers for evaluation and the reported absence of public model/dataset modification. That qualification matters when characterizing his coverage. We have assessed what he published, not independently re-audited every underlying technical or legal claim.\n\n## A concrete amplification problem\n\nThere is a notable headline/body discrepancy in his [18 August edition](https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/openai-stops-reinforcement-learning). The headline states that Astra reached the Critical cybersecurity threshold. The body says OpenAI could not rule out that threshold and separates Astra from the earlier Hugging Face incident.\n\nThe headline is more certain than the body. A reader seeing only a feed card receives a stronger claim than a reader who opens the article. That is an observable point where amplification changes the information. This single example warrants examination of headline compression; it does not establish deliberate deception or a systematic error rate.\n\n## Forest view\n\nThe record suggests a publication operating where commercial technology promotion, technical education, news selection and political debate meet. Capability breakthroughs and alarming incidents can both attract the same AI-interested readers. Audience growth is a plausible common incentive across opposing stories; we do not have Paul's revenue breakdown or editorial deliberations to establish his motive.\n\nThe useful structural paths are researcher/lab/mainstream report -> Paul -> X/newsletter audience, alongside named vendor -> disclosed sponsor placement -> that publication's audience. No payment or control edge from the AI-prohibition organizations is established. His ability to reach readers outside a dedicated safety audience is a plausible reason he matters, not a measured conversion result or a centrality ranking.\n\n## Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine\n\nSeparately, [ControlAI's 8 September post, by Andrea Miotti and Max Winga](https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach), says it was the organization negotiating with Hossenfelder and disputes her account. The supplied Sabine transcript itself left her offeror unnamed while separately naming ControlAI as sponsoring other creators. The correct update is: ControlAI subsequently self-identified as the organization involved. Its post does not publish the underlying emails or contracts, and Paul is not named.\n\nControlAI reports nine paid and nine unpaid videos, around 1,000 creators contacted and more than 60 briefed. Those are its own campaign figures. The post documents its stated sponsorship process, including contracts, review, citations and disclosure; it does not demonstrate Paul's participation. See adjacent-controlai-creator-outreach.md for the competing accounts and source limits.\n\n## What would change this assessment\n\nThe most useful new evidence would be a specific original campaign disclosure, a representation/media-kit record, a named creator roster, or briefing/contract correspondence that connects Paul to a defined policy campaign. Complete original long posts would help distinguish extended commentary, disclosure and endorsement beyond the available embeds. Additional pages merely listing him near ControlAI or Tegmark add little.\n\nTargeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.\n\n## Preserved material\n\ncommercial-and-identity.md contains six decisive identity/commercial sources and career leads. narrative-and-policy.md contains eight original-author records, counterevidence and exact access limits. narrative-captures contains four platform embed JSON captures and four publisher HTML captures, with acquisition timestamps. case.json preserves typed case-local relationships. These files have not been imported into or published on the live site.\n",
        "searchText": " Research through 12 September 2026. Scope: @rohanpaul_ai, Rohan's Bytes and rohan-paul.com. This is a research supplement, not a deployed website edition.  Assessment  Paul belongs in the map as a commercially sponsored AI publisher and a distributor of competing narratives about AI progress, risk and regulation. The inspected record establishes particular sponsor placements and particular acts of amplification. It does not establish a ControlAI/FLI commission, government sponsorship, prohibition-campaign membership or backstage coordination.  That distinction helps explain the network rather than diminishing his relevance. An advocacy organization does not need to employ every publisher who circulates its favored stories. A widely read technical curator can carry a warning beyond the audience that already follows safety organizations. Paul also circulates arguments favoring accessible AI and opposing concentration. His role is best understood through what he publishes and sells, without assigning him exclusive allegiance to one camp.  His  GitHub profile  cross-links the newsletter, X account and LinkedIn identity and presents him as a machine-learning engineer and newsletter founder/writer. It includes public fine-tuning, implementation and tutorial repositories. The profile's own audience numbers are self-reported, not verified delivery or reach. This is not the IIT Delhi robotics professor of the same name.  The current warning cycle  On  9 September he recirculated the WSJ report on Jacob Coxon , attributing the warning about potentially uncontrollable self-improvement to Coxon. On  10 September he posted an NBC interview excerpt . He also  summarized Anthropic's alignment assessment on 9 September .  X's public platform embeds establish his authorship, the dates and the visible openings. They truncate the long posts; the captures cannot establish every sentence, a later disclosure or the complete framing. Embedded videos were not watched in this pass. The warranted relation is reporting/quotation/amplification, not commission or adoption of every claim.  A secondary roundup groups him with ControlAI and other accounts covering Coxon. This was useful for finding his original post, but a topical cluster is not a coordination record. Multiple publications repeating the same interview are also not multiple independent witnesses for the interviewee's underlying prediction.  The commercial relationships we can actually name  Specific editions explicitly label sponsor sections for  Pika, 28 February ,  Toyo, 11 July ,  Limestone Digital, 24 July ,  Uncensored AI and Domus, 11 August , and  TARS Robotics, 22 August . These are observed sponsorship disclosures, not a hypothetical willingness to accept sponsors.  The sponsor sections show how the publication monetizes access to its audience. They do not reveal amounts, payment receipts, legal contracting entities, intermediaries or rights over neighboring editorial coverage. Internal edition dates differ by one day from the displayed publication dates for Toyo, Limestone and TARS; both are retained in source notes.  This is the money mechanism supported now: named vendors occupy clearly labeled promotional space in his AI publication. It cannot be converted into a finding that someone paid him to promote a particular AI law. Former Deutsche Bank, HSBC and AlphaSights roles appear in derivative biographies, but primary employment details were not readable in this pass. They remain leads, and even confirmed former employment would not establish present institutional direction.  Evidence against a simple prohibition-campaign classification  His  11 August edition  combines Sanders's pause demand with favorable discussion of a local model and quotations from Zuckerberg's argument for widely available superintelligence. It also carries the Uncensored AI and Domus sponsor sections. The Sanders subsection is introduced as quotations from his letter, not Paul's own demand.  On  17 August Paul called a David Sacks post a must-read . The short original embed includes Sacks's warning about the United States becoming an expensive closed-model island. This is positive recommendation of an anti-centralization argument; it does not imply agreement with all of Sacks's politics or prove independence from every conceivable sponsor.  His  24 July sandbox-escape coverage  includes operational qualifications: reduced refusals/classifiers for evaluation and the reported absence of public model/dataset modification. That qualification matters when characterizing his coverage. We have assessed what he published, not independently re-audited every underlying technical or legal claim.  A concrete amplification problem  There is a notable headline/body discrepancy in his  18 August edition . The headline states that Astra reached the Critical cybersecurity threshold. The body says OpenAI could not rule out that threshold and separates Astra from the earlier Hugging Face incident.  The headline is more certain than the body. A reader seeing only a feed card receives a stronger claim than a reader who opens the article. That is an observable point where amplification changes the information. This single example warrants examination of headline compression; it does not establish deliberate deception or a systematic error rate.  Forest view  The record suggests a publication operating where commercial technology promotion, technical education, news selection and political debate meet. Capability breakthroughs and alarming incidents can both attract the same AI-interested readers. Audience growth is a plausible common incentive across opposing stories; we do not have Paul's revenue breakdown or editorial deliberations to establish his motive.  The useful structural paths are researcher/lab/mainstream report -&gt; Paul -&gt; X/newsletter audience, alongside named vendor -&gt; disclosed sponsor placement -&gt; that publication's audience. No payment or control edge from the AI-prohibition organizations is established. His ability to reach readers outside a dedicated safety audience is a plausible reason he matters, not a measured conversion result or a centrality ranking.  Adjacent update: ControlAI and Sabine  Separately,  ControlAI's 8 September post, by Andrea Miotti and Max Winga , says it was the organization negotiating with Hossenfelder and disputes her account. The supplied Sabine transcript itself left her offeror unnamed while separately naming ControlAI as sponsoring other creators. The correct update is: ControlAI subsequently self-identified as the organization involved. Its post does not publish the underlying emails or contracts, and Paul is not named.  ControlAI reports nine paid and nine unpaid videos, around 1,000 creators contacted and more than 60 briefed. Those are its own campaign figures. The post documents its stated sponsorship process, including contracts, review, citations and disclosure; it does not demonstrate Paul's participation. See adjacent-controlai-creator-outreach.md for the competing accounts and source limits.  What would change this assessment  The most useful new evidence would be a specific original campaign disclosure, a representation/media-kit record, a named creator roster, or briefing/contract correspondence that connects Paul to a defined policy campaign. Complete original long posts would help distinguish extended commentary, disclosure and endorsement beyond the available embeds. Additional pages merely listing him near ControlAI or Tegmark add little.  Targeted searches covered ControlAI, FLI, CAIS, Lightcone, Frame Fellowship, People First, Tegmark, Coxon, Leahy, Bilyeu, Sobel, Sanders and pacing. The null institutional findings are bounded by indexing and direct X/LinkedIn access limits. They are not proof that no private relationship exists.  Preserved material  commercial-and-identity.md contains six decisive identity/commercial sources and career leads. narrative-and-policy.md contains eight original-author records, counterevidence and exact access limits. narrative-captures contains four platform embed JSON captures and four publisher HTML captures, with acquisition timestamps. case.json preserves typed case-local relationships. These files have not been imported into or published on the live site.\n ",
        "category": "AI & money",
        "kind": "research",
        "date": "2026-09-12",
        "sources": [],
        "sections": []
      },
      {
        "id": "w36-tallinn-funding-and-influence",
        "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics",
        "description": "The resources, decision rights and obligations connecting grantmakers, policy work, public pressure, media and infrastructure.",
        "markdown": "# Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics\n\nResearch checked 12 September 2026.\n\nJaan Tallinn's public records connect his philanthropy to several functions in AI politics: allocating grants, developing policy, organizing public pressure, producing media, and financing places where the community works. Some participants explicitly describe how those functions complement one another. The evidence supports examining the arrangements that sustain this ecosystem. It does not establish a single command structure. The captured [donation ledger](https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html) contains entries through 31 March 2025, so its historical payments cannot be presented as a complete account of current funding.\n\nControlAI provides a substantial direct connection. Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed on 14 November 2023 and £2 million on 10 April 2024, through his ledger's Slimrock vehicle, to Secure Future Research. The [company register](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415) preserves that identity under number 15088415 and records its name becoming CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026. Its [2024](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQ2NzM5NjgxOWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf) and [2025 accounts](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&format=pdf) omit income-and-expenditure statements. They therefore cannot establish what proportion of funding Tallinn supplied. Formal voting and appointment rights are disclosed for [Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control); the inspected articles contain no Tallinn-specific rights.\n\nAllocation also happens through intermediaries and delegated decisions. Tallinn's [funding-methods page](https://jaan.info/philanthropy/#funding-methods) distinguishes recommender committees, individual regrantors, unrestricted gifts, and direct grants. AIPI illustrates why those layers require careful accounting. Its three 2024 ledger entries are $10,000 on 19 July, $300,000 on 10 December, and $132,000 on 11 December. The [SFF table](https://survivalandflourishing.fund/) separately publishes a $142,000 program award and $300,000 Initiative Committee award. The arithmetic supports reconciling these against the $442,000 paid, rather than adding them again; receipt-level matching remains outstanding. [The Hack Foundation](https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding) is a disclosed fiscal sponsor, not another donor of the same money. AIPI's [donation page](https://theaipi.org/donate/) also embeds a Hack Club payment route.\n\nA further route connects pooled grantmaking with creators. On 27 November 2024, Tallinn's ledger records $786,994 through SFF to Vanguard Charitable, designated for account A2003126, the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund. [JueYan Zhang](https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/) is publicly identified as running that pooled multi-donor fund. [Frame's public FAQ](https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js) names it as a lead funder, alongside the Long Term Future Fund. Frame describes both independent creators and an organization-amplifier track working to briefs. It also says funders have no role in fellow selection or editorial content. The grant agreement and particular downstream allocation were not obtained.\n\nThe fund's [Manifund account](https://manifund.org/JueYan) records $41,162 for Michaël Trazzi's SB-1047 documentary. The [project's Donations tab](https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations) dates the AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025 and marks the project Complete Grant. This establishes media financing; the proposal describes informing AI-policy discussions while presenting proponents and opponents. It does not trace Tallinn's November contribution into this production or establish editorial approval rights. The meaningful connection is fund-level support for communication, with grant-specific conditions still unknown.\n\nThe clearest declared division of labor comes from [PauseAI Global's theory of change](https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change). It names MIRI, the Future of Life Institute, and ControlAI as organizations developing policy and expert consensus, while PauseAI builds public and political pressure. Its strategy includes coordinated national pressure, directing politicians toward policy partners, and rapid responses to AI incidents. Its [organization rules](https://pauseai.org/organization) locate campaign and communications coordination with executive and chapter leadership, with local adaptation. These are explicit organizational intentions, not evidence that donors direct every campaign. The theory of change rejects violence and dishonesty.\n\nPauseAI also specifies how greater funding could expand persuasion. Its [roadmap](https://pauseai.org/roadmap) has a €3.5 million scenario for narrative production, PR support, paid reach, and public-affairs staffing; an €8.5 million scenario proposes incubating additional organizations, including incident-response media. These are conditional plans, not demonstrated expenditure. Its [microgrant rules](https://pauseai.org/microgrants) are more concrete: grants are typically below €2,000, decided by the CEO and Organizing Director, with letters defining purpose, deliverables, and schedule before payment. Awarded letters and resulting reports would connect this machinery to particular outputs.\n\nFunding can also support access to policy drafting. CLTR's [2023 annual report](https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf) says it received £470,224 that year, all from SFF, and authored the entire model-reporting and information-sharing section of a UK frontier-AI safety guide. The [government document, published 27 October 2023](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety), acknowledges CLTR and other contributors. It describes emerging practices, not mandatory policy. Government acknowledgement corroborates participation; the section-level authorship claim is CLTR's. Drafts and correspondence could establish how officials selected and revised outside contributions.\n\nCredit arrangements reveal obligations that donation totals miss. On [31 March 2023](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz), Lightcone's Oliver Habryka described a $20 million property-and-renovation loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. His [13 December 2025 fundraiser](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y) describes a separate $1.7 million FTX-settlement advance: Tallinn would pay half of future grant recommendations until $1.29 million had been withheld. This shows how an earlier arrangement can affect later disbursements. Loan documents, current balances, and consent rights remain unexamined; these terms cannot be imported into ControlAI's grants.\n\nThe practical implication is that resources can sustain complementary routes to influence without purchasing editorial control. The decisive questions concern actual authority and obligations: who selects grantees, what deliverables and renewal conditions apply, which campaigns were activated, and which outside drafts became government text. Grant agreements, campaign records, drafting correspondence, and lending instruments would resolve those questions more directly than another list of shared affiliations.\n\nExplore the maps: [funding routes](/maps/tallinn-funding), [media financing](/maps/tallinn-media-funding), [policy and public pressure](/maps/policy-and-public-pressure), and [Lightcone financing](/maps/lightcone-finance).\n",
        "html": "<h2>Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics</h2>\n<p>Research checked 12 September 2026.</p>\n<p>Jaan Tallinn&#x27;s public records connect his philanthropy to several functions in AI politics: allocating grants, developing policy, organizing public pressure, producing media, and financing places where the community works. Some participants explicitly describe how those functions complement one another. The evidence supports examining the arrangements that sustain this ecosystem. It does not establish a single command structure. The captured <a href=\"https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html\">donation ledger</a> contains entries through 31 March 2025, so its historical payments cannot be presented as a complete account of current funding.</p>\n<p>ControlAI provides a substantial direct connection. Tallinn reports £500,000 disbursed on 14 November 2023 and £2 million on 10 April 2024, through his ledger&#x27;s Slimrock vehicle, to Secure Future Research. The <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415\">company register</a> preserves that identity under number 15088415 and records its name becoming CONTROLAI on 10 September 2026. Its <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzQ2NzM5NjgxOWFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&amp;format=pdf\">2024</a> and <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/filing-history/MzU0MDI5NDI2MmFkaXF6a2N4/document?download=0&amp;format=pdf\">2025 accounts</a> omit income-and-expenditure statements. They therefore cannot establish what proportion of funding Tallinn supplied. Formal voting and appointment rights are disclosed for <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15088415/persons-with-significant-control\">Andrea Miotti and Eva Behrens</a>; the inspected articles contain no Tallinn-specific rights.</p>\n<p>Allocation also happens through intermediaries and delegated decisions. Tallinn&#x27;s <a href=\"https://jaan.info/philanthropy/#funding-methods\">funding-methods page</a> distinguishes recommender committees, individual regrantors, unrestricted gifts, and direct grants. AIPI illustrates why those layers require careful accounting. Its three 2024 ledger entries are $10,000 on 19 July, $300,000 on 10 December, and $132,000 on 11 December. The <a href=\"https://survivalandflourishing.fund/\">SFF table</a> separately publishes a $142,000 program award and $300,000 Initiative Committee award. The arithmetic supports reconciling these against the $442,000 paid, rather than adding them again; receipt-level matching remains outstanding. <a href=\"https://hcb.hackclub.com/branding\">The Hack Foundation</a> is a disclosed fiscal sponsor, not another donor of the same money. AIPI&#x27;s <a href=\"https://theaipi.org/donate/\">donation page</a> also embeds a Hack Club payment route.</p>\n<p>A further route connects pooled grantmaking with creators. On 27 November 2024, Tallinn&#x27;s ledger records $786,994 through SFF to Vanguard Charitable, designated for account A2003126, the AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund. <a href=\"https://www.schmidtsciences.org/person/jueyan-zhang/\">JueYan Zhang</a> is publicly identified as running that pooled multi-donor fund. <a href=\"https://www.framefellowship.com/assets/index-CUMxxB1e.js\">Frame&#x27;s public FAQ</a> names it as a lead funder, alongside the Long Term Future Fund. Frame describes both independent creators and an organization-amplifier track working to briefs. It also says funders have no role in fellow selection or editorial content. The grant agreement and particular downstream allocation were not obtained.</p>\n<p>The fund&#x27;s <a href=\"https://manifund.org/JueYan\">Manifund account</a> records $41,162 for Michaël Trazzi&#x27;s SB-1047 documentary. The <a href=\"https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks?tab=donations\">project&#x27;s Donations tab</a> dates the AISTOF contribution to 21 January 2025 and marks the project Complete Grant. This establishes media financing; the proposal describes informing AI-policy discussions while presenting proponents and opponents. It does not trace Tallinn&#x27;s November contribution into this production or establish editorial approval rights. The meaningful connection is fund-level support for communication, with grant-specific conditions still unknown.</p>\n<p>The clearest declared division of labor comes from <a href=\"https://pauseai.org/theory-of-change\">PauseAI Global&#x27;s theory of change</a>. It names MIRI, the Future of Life Institute, and ControlAI as organizations developing policy and expert consensus, while PauseAI builds public and political pressure. Its strategy includes coordinated national pressure, directing politicians toward policy partners, and rapid responses to AI incidents. Its <a href=\"https://pauseai.org/organization\">organization rules</a> locate campaign and communications coordination with executive and chapter leadership, with local adaptation. These are explicit organizational intentions, not evidence that donors direct every campaign. The theory of change rejects violence and dishonesty.</p>\n<p>PauseAI also specifies how greater funding could expand persuasion. Its <a href=\"https://pauseai.org/roadmap\">roadmap</a> has a €3.5 million scenario for narrative production, PR support, paid reach, and public-affairs staffing; an €8.5 million scenario proposes incubating additional organizations, including incident-response media. These are conditional plans, not demonstrated expenditure. Its <a href=\"https://pauseai.org/microgrants\">microgrant rules</a> are more concrete: grants are typically below €2,000, decided by the CEO and Organizing Director, with letters defining purpose, deliverables, and schedule before payment. Awarded letters and resulting reports would connect this machinery to particular outputs.</p>\n<p>Funding can also support access to policy drafting. CLTR&#x27;s <a href=\"https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CLTR-2023-Annual-Report.pdf\">2023 annual report</a> says it received £470,224 that year, all from SFF, and authored the entire model-reporting and information-sharing section of a UK frontier-AI safety guide. The <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety/emerging-processes-for-frontier-ai-safety\">government document, published 27 October 2023</a>, acknowledges CLTR and other contributors. It describes emerging practices, not mandatory policy. Government acknowledgement corroborates participation; the section-level authorship claim is CLTR&#x27;s. Drafts and correspondence could establish how officials selected and revised outside contributions.</p>\n<p>Credit arrangements reveal obligations that donation totals miss. On <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dZsAgZaPeWpoMuBxC/who-is-slimrock-investments-pte-ltd-and-how-are-they-related?commentId=xjn9rpvk22ixPkhLz\">31 March 2023</a>, Lightcone&#x27;s Oliver Habryka described a $20 million property-and-renovation loan from Tallinn-owned Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd. His <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y\">13 December 2025 fundraiser</a> describes a separate $1.7 million FTX-settlement advance: Tallinn would pay half of future grant recommendations until $1.29 million had been withheld. This shows how an earlier arrangement can affect later disbursements. Loan documents, current balances, and consent rights remain unexamined; these terms cannot be imported into ControlAI&#x27;s grants.</p>\n<p>The practical implication is that resources can sustain complementary routes to influence without purchasing editorial control. The decisive questions concern actual authority and obligations: who selects grantees, what deliverables and renewal conditions apply, which campaigns were activated, and which outside drafts became government text. Grant agreements, campaign records, drafting correspondence, and lending instruments would resolve those questions more directly than another list of shared affiliations.</p>\n<p>Explore the maps: <a href=\"/maps/tallinn-funding\">funding routes</a>, <a href=\"/maps/tallinn-media-funding\">media financing</a>, <a href=\"/maps/policy-and-public-pressure\">policy and public pressure</a>, and <a href=\"/maps/lightcone-finance\">Lightcone financing</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "w36-tallinn-selected-payments",
        "title": "Tallinn: the selected payment records",
        "description": "Dates, vehicles, named payees, purposes and amounts for the historical funding paths.",
        "markdown": "# Selected Tallinn funding entries\n\nHistorical donor-reported disbursements in the captured [Tallinn ledger](https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html), which extends through 31 March 2025. Figures are not current budgets or a complete account of recipient income. Do not add these payments to the same grants’ recommendations or upstream transfers.\n\n## ControlAI legal entity\n\n2023-11-14; Slimrock; Secure Future Research — Donation (500,000 GBP @ 1.2317); USD 615,850\n\n2024-04-10; Slimrock; Secure Future Research — Donation (2,000,000 GBP @ 1.2731); USD 2,546,200\n\n\n## PauseAI Global\n\n2024-03-22; LSG; Stichting PauseAI — General support; USD 20,000\n\n2024-11-20; SFF-spec; Stichting PauseAI — General support for PauseAI Global; USD 10,000\n\n\n## PauseAI USA via sponsor\n\n2024-07-19; SFF-spec; Manifold for Charity — General support for PauseAI USA; USD 25,000\n\n2024-08-08; SFF-spec; Manifold for Charity — General support for PauseAI USA; USD 10,000\n\n2024-08-08; SFF-spec; Manifold for Charity — General support for PauseAI USA; USD 25,000\n\n\n## AI Policy Institute\n\n2024-07-19; SFF-spec; Hack Foundation — General support for the AI Policy Institute; USD 10,000\n\n2024-12-10; SFC; The Hack Foundation — General support for the AI Policy Institute; USD 300,000\n\n2024-12-11; FP-US; The AI Policy Institute — General support; USD 132,000\n\n\n## CAIS Action Fund\n\n2023-08-22; SFC; Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support; USD 600,000\n\n2024-04-18; SFC; Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support; USD 720,000\n\n2024-04-24; SFC; Center for AI Safety Action Fund — Unconditional gift; USD 1,000,000\n\n2024-06-05; SFC; Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support; USD 400,000\n\n2024-11-15; SFC; Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support; USD 501,000\n\n\n## AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund\n\n2024-11-27; SFF; Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program — For A2003126: AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund; USD 786,994\n\n\n## APPG Future Generations\n\n2020-04-17; FP-UK; All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support; USD 40,000\n\n2021-04-26; FP-UK; All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support; USD 40,000\n\n2021-07-28; FP-UK; All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support; USD 85,500\n\n2022-03-24; FP-UK; All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support; USD 85,500\n\n\n## Centre for Long-Term Resilience\n\n2021-07-28; FP-UK; Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — General support; USD 1,013,000\n\n2021-12-23; FP-US; Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — To work with academics to develop policy ideas to help boost resilience to extreme risks; USD 885,000\n\n2022-07-21; FP-UK; Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — Alpenglow Group; USD 908,000\n\n2023-08-08; SFF-spec; Founders Pledge — General support for the Centre for Long-Term Resilience; USD 577,000\n\n2024-07-19; SFF-spec; Founders Pledge — General support for the Centre for Long-Term Resilience; USD 100,000\n\n2024-07-19; SFF-spec; Founders Pledge — General support for the Centre for Long-Term Resilience; USD 10,000\n\n2024-12-12; FP-UK; Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — General support; USD 973,000\n\n\n## Tarbell Fellowship\n\n2024-07-23; SFF-spec; Players Philanthropy Fund — To Training for Good for Tarbell Fellowship; USD 10,000\n\n2024-11-21; FP-US; Players Philanthropy Fund — General support for Tarbell Fellowship; USD 510,000\n\n",
        "html": "<h2>Selected historical disbursements</h2><p>These are donor-reported entries, not current budgets or recipient-confirmed receipts. Do not add them to overlapping recommendations or upstream transfers. <a href=\"https://jaan.info/philanthropy/donations.html\">Donor ledger</a></p><h3>ControlAI legal entity</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2023-11-14</td><td>Slimrock</td><td>Secure Future Research — Donation (500,000 GBP @ 1.2317)</td><td>USD 615,850</td></tr><tr><td>2024-04-10</td><td>Slimrock</td><td>Secure Future Research — Donation (2,000,000 GBP @ 1.2731)</td><td>USD 2,546,200</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>PauseAI Global</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2024-03-22</td><td>LSG</td><td>Stichting PauseAI — General support</td><td>USD 20,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-11-20</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Stichting PauseAI — General support for PauseAI Global</td><td>USD 10,000</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>PauseAI USA via sponsor</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2024-07-19</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Manifold for Charity — General support for PauseAI USA</td><td>USD 25,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-08-08</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Manifold for Charity — General support for PauseAI USA</td><td>USD 10,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-08-08</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Manifold for Charity — General support for PauseAI USA</td><td>USD 25,000</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>AI Policy Institute</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2024-07-19</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Hack Foundation — General support for the AI Policy Institute</td><td>USD 10,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-12-10</td><td>SFC</td><td>The Hack Foundation — General support for the AI Policy Institute</td><td>USD 300,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-12-11</td><td>FP-US</td><td>The AI Policy Institute — General support</td><td>USD 132,000</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>CAIS Action Fund</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2023-08-22</td><td>SFC</td><td>Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support</td><td>USD 600,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-04-18</td><td>SFC</td><td>Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support</td><td>USD 720,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-04-24</td><td>SFC</td><td>Center for AI Safety Action Fund — Unconditional gift</td><td>USD 1,000,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-06-05</td><td>SFC</td><td>Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support</td><td>USD 400,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-11-15</td><td>SFC</td><td>Center for AI Safety Action Fund — General support</td><td>USD 501,000</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2024-11-27</td><td>SFF</td><td>Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program — For A2003126: AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund</td><td>USD 786,994</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>APPG Future Generations</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2020-04-17</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support</td><td>USD 40,000</td></tr><tr><td>2021-04-26</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support</td><td>USD 40,000</td></tr><tr><td>2021-07-28</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support</td><td>USD 85,500</td></tr><tr><td>2022-03-24</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>All-Party Parliamentary Group for Future Generations — General support</td><td>USD 85,500</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Centre for Long-Term Resilience</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2021-07-28</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — General support</td><td>USD 1,013,000</td></tr><tr><td>2021-12-23</td><td>FP-US</td><td>Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — To work with academics to develop policy ideas to help boost resilience to extreme risks</td><td>USD 885,000</td></tr><tr><td>2022-07-21</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — Alpenglow Group</td><td>USD 908,000</td></tr><tr><td>2023-08-08</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Founders Pledge — General support for the Centre for Long-Term Resilience</td><td>USD 577,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-07-19</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Founders Pledge — General support for the Centre for Long-Term Resilience</td><td>USD 100,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-07-19</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Founders Pledge — General support for the Centre for Long-Term Resilience</td><td>USD 10,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-12-12</td><td>FP-UK</td><td>Centre for Long-Term Resilience / Alpenglow — General support</td><td>USD 973,000</td></tr></tbody></table><h3>Tarbell Fellowship</h3><table><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>Via</th><th>Payee / purpose</th><th>Amount</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2024-07-23</td><td>SFF-spec</td><td>Players Philanthropy Fund — To Training for Good for Tarbell Fellowship</td><td>USD 10,000</td></tr><tr><td>2024-11-21</td><td>FP-US</td><td>Players Philanthropy Fund — General support for Tarbell Fellowship</td><td>USD 510,000</td></tr></tbody></table>"
      },
      {
        "id": "civic-shout-business-and-incentives",
        "title": "Civic Shout: the business behind the petition",
        "description": "Supporter acquisition, campaign incentives, political purchases, fiscal sponsorship, the distinct organizational names and new Frame grant disclosures.",
        "markdown": "# Civic Shout: the business behind the petition\n\n\nResearch checked 12 September 2026.\n\n## The mechanism worth adding\n\nCivic Shout combines political advocacy with a commercial market for opt-in supporters and attention. It sells email/SMS list acquisition and website traffic to progressive nonprofits, Democratic campaigns, unions, PACs and businesses. Its importance is therefore more specific than petition hosting: it can admit campaigns, decide which content runs, recruit participating organizations, distribute attention, and compensate distribution with platform credits or—in a separate program—cash revenue shares.\n\nThe [privacy policy](https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy), last updated 20 August 2025, identifies the website's owner/operator as **Civic Shout, LLC**. The [Foundation's current footer](https://civicshoutfoundation.org/) calls this a Delaware LLC. Neither disclosure identifies its members, beneficial owners, ownership percentages or financing history. Treat LLC ownership as unresolved. A founder or CEO title does not settle equity ownership.\n\n**Josh Nelson** signed an [FEC comment in 2022](https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf), PDF page 9, as Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder; current [company posts](https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout) continue to identify him with its leadership. **Elliott Golden's own professional résumé** identifies him as Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder during 2016–2018; [his résumé](https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden) is not a current ownership register. [Wide Eye's July 2017 project account](https://medium.com/@wideeyeco/civic-shout-a-new-user-experience-for-a-new-reality-958bb762f501) describes working with Golden and Stand Up America on the earlier Messenger-based service. This older product history means generic listings claiming a 2018 founding or 2022 launch need qualification. **Marie Bergen** is currently named Head of Joint Actions on the [official hosting page](https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host).\n\nThe [current price sheet](https://civicshout.com/pricing) lists $1.25 per national lead and $2 per state-targeted lead; traffic costs $0.75 and $1.25 per click respectively. Prepayments of $100,000 or more can reduce national lead/click prices to $0.75/$0.45. The company names Blue State, Middle Seat and M+R as agency users and publishes testimonials from Environmental Action and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Those are provider-disclosed customer relationships, not independently reconciled invoices or evidence that these customers funded the AI petition.\n\nIts [content policy](https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy) explicitly limits participation to progressive causes, excludes conservative campaigns, and requires staff approval of ads before delivery. It also bars false/misleading content and direct donation solicitation in Express CPC ads. This documents a gatekeeper with an affirmative political orientation, not a neutral conduit or evidence of covert common control over clients.\n\n## Two incentive programs, different money\n\nThe [Partner Terms, updated 31 January 2026](https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service), give Civic Shout discretion over Joint Action admission, hosting, signer attribution and credit issuance. Each valid referred action earns credits for three national CPC clicks. Credits are nontransferable, nonrefundable and have no cash value; redemption is restricted to eligible petition/letter ads. Hosts may receive signer details. The hosting page says signing joins the host's list, followed by optional suggested actions. These are published rules, not proof of actual credit redemption or every user's experience.\n\nThe separate [Affiliate Terms](https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service) provide a variable share of campaign revenue for qualifying referrals via email/SMS, subject to a platform-specified monthly cap. Earnings can be transferred to a Stripe account, normally twice monthly, or taken as platform credit with a discount. Thus “Civic Shout never pays recruiters” would be wrong; “AI-petition recruiters receive cash” is also unsupported. The disclosed AI offer belongs to Joint Actions.\n\nThe [AI petition preview](https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216) now names **Action Collective**, **College Democrats of America** and **Left Click** as participants. Action Collective was absent from the selectively read existing profile. It is a third name, not Collective Shout. The page offers $2.25 in credits per referred signature, identifies Civic Shout as host, and plans committee delivery and follow-up congressional letters. Actual delivery, realized spending, participant instructions and congressional-office coordination remain unverified. The petition's AI-incident claims were not independently checked in this pass and should not be restated as findings.\n\n## Political spending: one confirmed payer, one carefully classified lead\n\n[BLUEVOTE.ORG's January 28, 2026 FEC filing](https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf), committee C00869040, reports two Schedule B payments to Civic Shout for “Advocacy platform”: **$500 on September 2, 2025**, transaction SB21B.4423, PDF page 9; and **$1,000 on December 24, 2025**, transaction SB21B.4424, page 10. The original PDF and both page renders were inspected and saved. This establishes a reported political-committee purchase, not donor equity, total Civic Shout revenue, or AI-campaign funding. No claim is made that this is the latest amended filing or an exhaustive FEC total.\n\n[Forward Blue PAC's January 28, 2024 filing](https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/435/202401289600454435/202401289600454435.pdf), PDF page 53, has a $3,333.33 Civic Shout **staff-advance memo entry** dated November 27, 2023. Page 66 records the corresponding obligation to David Austin; page 63 separately records settlement of an October advance. Do not sum memo entries, reimbursement and outstanding debt as new direct vendor payments. This supports historical use for advertising while the precise cash route needs reconciliation.\n\n## A philanthropic route into audience acquisition\n\nThe [Foundation's current legal notice](https://civicshoutfoundation.org/) describes Civic Shout LLC operating The Civic Shout Foundation as a **Players Philanthropy Fund, Inc. project**, citing EIN 27-6601178. The older [climate one-pager](https://civicshoutfoundation.org/assets/civicshout_foundation_climate_1_pager-e3ffec1f8cdbdf6e27c457a1f0b18059c7f85622650c1e1a8994767adccb8061.pdf) calls the sponsor a Maryland charitable trust; preserve this temporal/legal wording discrepancy rather than silently treating both descriptions as a current incorporation record.\n\nThe [fundraising page](https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders) offers a $25,000 package supporting one nonprofit with 30,000 opt-in subscribers and consultation, and a $500,000 package for 20 groups in a donor-selected issue area. Its [team page](https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about) names Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden. This is an explicit way for philanthropic money to subsidize organizations' audience-building, with shared people between commercial platform and project. It does not disclose actual donor receipts, contracts, transfer pricing, grant-selection authority or private benefit. No claim of improper self-dealing follows.\n\n## Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout\n\nThe [Australian Business Register](https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097) identifies **COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED**, ABN/ACN 30 162 159 097 / 162 159 097, an Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Its [team](https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team) names Melinda Tankard Reist, Caitlin Roper, Renee Chopping, Lyn Swanson Kennedy, Coralie Alison and Bernie Poljak. These differ from the Civic Shout leaders identified above. Its [FAQ](https://www.collectiveshout.org/faq) describes a charity limited by guarantee with no affiliation to religious or political institutions; that last statement is its own representation.\n\nThis bounded pass found **no shared legal entity, named leader, contract, payer or campaign partnership between Civic Shout and Collective Shout**. That is a scoped negative result, not proof of universal independence. Do not create a relationship edge from the similar names. The actual newly listed AI participant links to [Action Collective](https://youractioncollective.com/), a separate progressive-action newsletter; that site's public archive does not establish its ultimate ownership.\n\n## One new Tallinn/Frame funding result\n\n[Frame's public grantmaking.ai profile](https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d) has an **organization-edited “Grants Received” block updated July 13, 2026**. It reports **“Jaan Tallin (DAF)” $20,000**, **AISTOF/Jueyan Zhang $280,000**, and another AISTOF entry with amount hidden. Preserve the donor spelling in source data; the intended Tallinn identity is strongly supported by context but the specific DAF is unnamed. Akshyae Singh's public reply says the $280,000 was for Cohort 1.0. The profile names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes Frame selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. These are recipient-side disclosures, not bank receipts, grant contracts, precise payment dates, or evidence of a donor selection veto. Do not infer the hidden amount or collapse the two AISTOF records into a known total.\n\nThis adds recipient-reported direct Tallinn support beyond the earlier upstream Vanguard/AISTOF record without tracing those pooled dollars into any particular creator. Selection rights and grant conditions remain the next decisive documents.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Civic Shout: the business behind the petition</h1>\n<p>Research checked 12 September 2026.</p>\n<h2>The mechanism worth adding</h2>\n<p>Civic Shout combines political advocacy with a commercial market for opt-in supporters and attention. It sells email/SMS list acquisition and website traffic to progressive nonprofits, Democratic campaigns, unions, PACs and businesses. Its importance is therefore more specific than petition hosting: it can admit campaigns, decide which content runs, recruit participating organizations, distribute attention, and compensate distribution with platform credits or—in a separate program—cash revenue shares.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/privacy-policy\">privacy policy</a>, last updated 20 August 2025, identifies the website's owner/operator as <strong>Civic Shout, LLC</strong>. The <a href=\"https://civicshoutfoundation.org/\">Foundation's current footer</a> calls this a Delaware LLC. Neither disclosure identifies its members, beneficial owners, ownership percentages or financing history. Treat LLC ownership as unresolved. A founder or CEO title does not settle equity ownership.</p>\n<p><strong>Josh Nelson</strong> signed an <a href=\"https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214C_26.pdf\">FEC comment in 2022</a>, PDF page 9, as Civic Shout CEO and Juggernaut Project cofounder; current <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/company/civic-shout\">company posts</a> continue to identify him with its leadership. <strong>Elliott Golden's own professional résumé</strong> identifies him as Civic Shout lead product designer/cofounder during 2016–2018; <a href=\"https://www.toptal.com/designers/resume/elliott-golden\">his résumé</a> is not a current ownership register. <a href=\"https://medium.com/@wideeyeco/civic-shout-a-new-user-experience-for-a-new-reality-958bb762f501\">Wide Eye's July 2017 project account</a> describes working with Golden and Stand Up America on the earlier Messenger-based service. This older product history means generic listings claiming a 2018 founding or 2022 launch need qualification. <strong>Marie Bergen</strong> is currently named Head of Joint Actions on the <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/joint-actions/host\">official hosting page</a>.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/pricing\">current price sheet</a> lists $1.25 per national lead and $2 per state-targeted lead; traffic costs $0.75 and $1.25 per click respectively. Prepayments of $100,000 or more can reduce national lead/click prices to $0.75/$0.45. The company names Blue State, Middle Seat and M+R as agency users and publishes testimonials from Environmental Action and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Those are provider-disclosed customer relationships, not independently reconciled invoices or evidence that these customers funded the AI petition.</p>\n<p>Its <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/partners/content-policy\">content policy</a> explicitly limits participation to progressive causes, excludes conservative campaigns, and requires staff approval of ads before delivery. It also bars false/misleading content and direct donation solicitation in Express CPC ads. This documents a gatekeeper with an affirmative political orientation, not a neutral conduit or evidence of covert common control over clients.</p>\n<h2>Two incentive programs, different money</h2>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/partners/terms-of-service\">Partner Terms, updated 31 January 2026</a>, give Civic Shout discretion over Joint Action admission, hosting, signer attribution and credit issuance. Each valid referred action earns credits for three national CPC clicks. Credits are nontransferable, nonrefundable and have no cash value; redemption is restricted to eligible petition/letter ads. Hosts may receive signer details. The hosting page says signing joins the host's list, followed by optional suggested actions. These are published rules, not proof of actual credit redemption or every user's experience.</p>\n<p>The separate <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/affiliate-terms-of-service\">Affiliate Terms</a> provide a variable share of campaign revenue for qualifying referrals via email/SMS, subject to a platform-specified monthly cap. Earnings can be transferred to a Stripe account, normally twice monthly, or taken as platform credit with a discount. Thus “Civic Shout never pays recruiters” would be wrong; “AI-petition recruiters receive cash” is also unsupported. The disclosed AI offer belongs to Joint Actions.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://civicshout.com/p/stop-big-tech-from-building-uncontrollable-ai?ja=216\">AI petition preview</a> now names <strong>Action Collective</strong>, <strong>College Democrats of America</strong> and <strong>Left Click</strong> as participants. Action Collective was absent from the selectively read existing profile. It is a third name, not Collective Shout. The page offers $2.25 in credits per referred signature, identifies Civic Shout as host, and plans committee delivery and follow-up congressional letters. Actual delivery, realized spending, participant instructions and congressional-office coordination remain unverified. The petition's AI-incident claims were not independently checked in this pass and should not be restated as findings.</p>\n<h2>Political spending: one confirmed payer, one carefully classified lead</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/970/202601289794288970/202601289794288970.pdf\">BLUEVOTE.ORG's January 28, 2026 FEC filing</a>, committee C00869040, reports two Schedule B payments to Civic Shout for “Advocacy platform”: <strong>$500 on September 2, 2025</strong>, transaction SB21B.4423, PDF page 9; and <strong>$1,000 on December 24, 2025</strong>, transaction SB21B.4424, page 10. The original PDF and both page renders were inspected and saved. This establishes a reported political-committee purchase, not donor equity, total Civic Shout revenue, or AI-campaign funding. No claim is made that this is the latest amended filing or an exhaustive FEC total.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/435/202401289600454435/202401289600454435.pdf\">Forward Blue PAC's January 28, 2024 filing</a>, PDF page 53, has a $3,333.33 Civic Shout <strong>staff-advance memo entry</strong> dated November 27, 2023. Page 66 records the corresponding obligation to David Austin; page 63 separately records settlement of an October advance. Do not sum memo entries, reimbursement and outstanding debt as new direct vendor payments. This supports historical use for advertising while the precise cash route needs reconciliation.</p>\n<h2>A philanthropic route into audience acquisition</h2>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://civicshoutfoundation.org/\">Foundation's current legal notice</a> describes Civic Shout LLC operating The Civic Shout Foundation as a <strong>Players Philanthropy Fund, Inc. project</strong>, citing EIN 27-6601178. The older <a href=\"https://civicshoutfoundation.org/assets/civicshout_foundation_climate_1_pager-e3ffec1f8cdbdf6e27c457a1f0b18059c7f85622650c1e1a8994767adccb8061.pdf\">climate one-pager</a> calls the sponsor a Maryland charitable trust; preserve this temporal/legal wording discrepancy rather than silently treating both descriptions as a current incorporation record.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://civicshoutfoundation.org/funders\">fundraising page</a> offers a $25,000 package supporting one nonprofit with 30,000 opt-in subscribers and consultation, and a $500,000 package for 20 groups in a donor-selected issue area. Its <a href=\"https://civicshoutfoundation.org/about\">team page</a> names Nelson, Beth Becker and Golden. This is an explicit way for philanthropic money to subsidize organizations' audience-building, with shared people between commercial platform and project. It does not disclose actual donor receipts, contracts, transfer pricing, grant-selection authority or private benefit. No claim of improper self-dealing follows.</p>\n<h2>Civic Shout is not established as connected to Collective Shout</h2>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=30162159097\">Australian Business Register</a> identifies <strong>COLLECTIVE SHOUT LIMITED</strong>, ABN/ACN 30 162 159 097 / 162 159 097, an Australian Public Company active since 31 January 2013. Its <a href=\"https://www.collectiveshout.org/our_team\">team</a> names Melinda Tankard Reist, Caitlin Roper, Renee Chopping, Lyn Swanson Kennedy, Coralie Alison and Bernie Poljak. These differ from the Civic Shout leaders identified above. Its <a href=\"https://www.collectiveshout.org/faq\">FAQ</a> describes a charity limited by guarantee with no affiliation to religious or political institutions; that last statement is its own representation.</p>\n<p>This bounded pass found <strong>no shared legal entity, named leader, contract, payer or campaign partnership between Civic Shout and Collective Shout</strong>. That is a scoped negative result, not proof of universal independence. Do not create a relationship edge from the similar names. The actual newly listed AI participant links to <a href=\"https://youractioncollective.com/\">Action Collective</a>, a separate progressive-action newsletter; that site's public archive does not establish its ultimate ownership.</p>\n<h2>One new Tallinn/Frame funding result</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://app.grantmaking.ai/projects/3c7356e9-d8db-446d-bafe-6f03397b857d\">Frame's public grantmaking.ai profile</a> has an <strong>organization-edited “Grants Received” block updated July 13, 2026</strong>. It reports <strong>“Jaan Tallin (DAF)” $20,000</strong>, <strong>AISTOF/Jueyan Zhang $280,000</strong>, and another AISTOF entry with amount hidden. Preserve the donor spelling in source data; the intended Tallinn identity is strongly supported by context but the specific DAF is unnamed. Akshyae Singh's public reply says the $280,000 was for Cohort 1.0. The profile names Manifold for Charity as fiscal sponsor and describes Frame selecting 13 of 150-plus applicants. These are recipient-side disclosures, not bank receipts, grant contracts, precise payment dates, or evidence of a donor selection veto. Do not infer the hidden amount or collapse the two AISTOF records into a known total.</p>\n<p>This adds recipient-reported direct Tallinn support beyond the earlier upstream Vanguard/AISTOF record without tracing those pooled dollars into any particular creator. Selection rights and grant conditions remain the next decisive documents.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy",
        "title": "Marc Andreessen: capital and policy",
        "description": "The investment, political-giving, governance and policy routes around Andreessen and a16z, and what those records do not establish.",
        "markdown": "# Marc Andreessen: capital and policy\n\nResearch checked 12 September 2026.\n\nMarc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, public advocacy for rapid AI development, personal political giving and a corporate oversight role at Meta. The important connections run through institutions with different powers: investment funds, companies, political committees and government policy processes. A shared investor or an overlapping argument does not make those institutions a single chain of command.\n\nHis [6 June 2023 essay](https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/) advocates faster AI development and diffusion, American technological predominance and defensive uses against malicious actors. It rejects fears of an independently motivated AI takeover. His [16 October 2023 manifesto](https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/) attacks existential-risk and precautionary thinking. These are influential arguments, not evidence that the safety questions have been settled. Nor do they establish a financial or contractual relationship with a named safety organization.\n\n## Capital reaches the physical economy\n\nOn [9 January 2026](https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/), Ben Horowitz announced more than $15 billion raised across a16z funds, including $1.176 billion for American Dynamism, $1.7 billion for Infrastructure and $6.75 billion for Growth. These are fund resources, not Marc Andreessen's personal donations or proof that every dollar has been invested.\n\nThe [Machine Age Fund announcement on 28 August 2026](https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/) reports $1.1 billion raised for chips, memory, networking, storage, data centers, robotics and other physical AI systems. The sources do not reconcile this fund with January's groups, so the two headlines should not automatically be added.\n\nThe investment mechanism is particularly clear in [Volta's Series A, announced 4 August 2026](https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/), which a16z co-led. The firm's explanation identifies a financing constraint: costly compute infrastructure needs long-term commitments from creditworthy customers, while many startups are funded over shorter periods and cannot make those commitments. Volta proposes combining cloud operations with project finance to extend access. The announcement does not disclose a16z's check, customer contract terms or achieved capacity.\n\nThe model-company connection is direct. [OpenAI's 31 March 2026 financing announcement](https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/) names a16z among the co-leads of a round containing $122 billion in committed capital. That figure belongs to the whole round. Neither a16z's investment nor its specific governance rights are disclosed.\n\nAnduril supplies another connection. Its [17 June 2021 Series D announcement](https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/) names a16z and Founders Fund as participants in a $450 million round led by Elad Gil. This is co-investment in a company. It is not Peter Thiel's personal donation, and it does not demonstrate common operational command.\n\nThat company later announced an operational partnership with another part of the investment landscape. [Anduril and OpenAI's 4 December 2024 announcement](https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s) describes combining models, Lattice and counter-drone data for national-security applications and operator decision support. It sets out training and deployment intentions, without publishing the full agreement or independently demonstrating every promised capability.\n\n## Political money needs the correct donor\n\nRight for America's [quarterly filing dated 15 October 2024](https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf), printed page 6, records a personal contribution: **$2.5 million from Marc Andreessen on 24 July 2024**, transaction SA11A.12495. A16Z is listed as his employer. That field does not turn the firm into the donor. This is one checked receipt, not a complete political-spending total.\n\nFairshake requires a different distinction. In its [disclosure updated in May and August 2024](https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac), a16z reports $47 million in firm contributions to Fairshake and associated PACs. The August correction says founders' names in ownership memo entries are not additional personal gifts. The firm also disclaims control over Fairshake's spending. On [4 November 2024](https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/), Chris Dixon announced more than $23 million additional firm support for the 2026 cycle, alongside meetings and introductions between policymakers and entrepreneurs. These are dated donor disclosures, not a fresh audit of all receipts through September 2026.\n\nThe separately reviewed Leading the Future filings record two $25 million a16z contributions, received on 22 August 2025 and 11 February 2026. Greg and Anna Brockman's separate individual contributions are not OpenAI corporate money. A $5 million transfer to Think Big on 24 February 2026 is downstream committee money, not another outside donor contribution. Those distinctions prevent an apparent network total from counting the same money again at each stop. [January filing](https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf), [Q1 filing](https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf).\n\n## From a political position to an institutional intervention\n\nAndreessen and Horowitz's [Little Tech Agenda of 5 July 2024](https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/) declares a political strategy of supporting or opposing politicians according to their treatment of startups, regardless of party. It connects development policy to manufacturing, energy, defense and market access. That is a stated allocation rule, not an audit proving that every subsequent decision followed it.\n\nA more concrete intervention is the firm's [formal 14 March 2025 submission to OSTP](https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf). The document identifies AH Capital Management LLC under the a16z brand. It asks for federal preemption of state restrictions on model development, continued state enforcement against harmful conduct, limited model-disclosure duties, and compute and talent investment. It permits government reuse of the document without attribution. This establishes an organized input into policy development; adoption of its proposals and the firm's causal influence remain separate questions.\n\nIts [Defense Reform campaign](https://a16z.com/defense-reform/) is similarly specific about a market-access objective: commercial acquisition, acquisition-workforce reform and rapid procurement pathways for munitions and autonomous systems. The page cites House and Senate NDAA provisions. It documents advocacy relevant to portfolio companies seeking government customers. The undated page and its references were not reconciled against final legislation, so it cannot support a claim of legislative victory.\n\nAndreessen's corporate authority is also more specific than a general association. [Meta's governance roster](https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx) lists him as a director since June 2008 and a Risk & Strategy Committee member. The [charter effective 1 June 2025](https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf) gives the committee a role reviewing technology, product development and partnerships, recommending how to balance growth and risk, and retaining advisers. Members serve at the board's discretion. These are collective oversight functions, not proof that Andreessen personally directs Meta's model releases.\n\n## Shared markets and disputed rules\n\nA useful synthesis is that a16z works on both technological supply and the conditions under which it can become a market. Funds provide capital. Infrastructure ventures address physical and financing constraints. Policy work addresses legal permission to develop and deploy. Defense advocacy addresses acquisition. Political giving supplies another route into the legislative environment. The records support these mechanisms; they do not establish a quid pro quo among them.\n\nThe coalitions are also less tidy than a division between startups and incumbents. On [1 November 2024](https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/), Andreessen and Horowitz coauthored an AI policy statement with Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Brad Smith, explicitly proposing collaboration across small and large firms. The later OpenAI financing is another reason not to treat “Little Tech” as a permanent category of company size or a prohibition on incumbent alliances.\n\nThe safety dispute crosses shared commercial markets. [Anthropic's 21 July 2026 disclosure](https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action) brings its announced Public First Action support to $40 million. Both donations are restricted to public education and policy and may not influence federal, state or local candidate elections. Anthropic advocates independent evaluation and government power to slow or block seriously dangerous deployments, a materially different allocation of authority from a16z's preferred approach. This is US Public First Action, distinct from the UK Public First consultancy commissioned by CLTR.\n\nYet Anthropic also entered defense integration. A [Palantir issuer release distributed 7 November 2024](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations) says Claude became accessible in Palantir AIP on AWS that month, including an IL6-accredited environment. That historical access claim does not establish the current contract status after subsequent disputes. It also does not imply a16z financing of Anthropic or control by Palantir's founders.\n\nThe decisive open questions concern the terms that would turn resources into authority: investor-specific rights at OpenAI and Anduril; donor restrictions and allocation authority inside political networks; a traceable path from submitted proposals to adopted rules; and customer obligations underwriting infrastructure. Those are more informative than treating ideological proximity, financing and implementation as interchangeable relationships.\n\n[Explore the capital and policy map](/maps/andreessen-capital-and-policy).\n",
        "html": "<h1>Marc Andreessen: capital and policy</h1>\n<p>Research checked 12 September 2026.</p>\n<p>Marc Andreessen combines venture-firm leadership, public advocacy for rapid AI development, personal political giving and a corporate oversight role at Meta. The important connections run through institutions with different powers: investment funds, companies, political committees and government policy processes. A shared investor or an overlapping argument does not make those institutions a single chain of command.</p>\n<p>His <a href=\"https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/\">6 June 2023 essay</a> advocates faster AI development and diffusion, American technological predominance and defensive uses against malicious actors. It rejects fears of an independently motivated AI takeover. His <a href=\"https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/\">16 October 2023 manifesto</a> attacks existential-risk and precautionary thinking. These are influential arguments, not evidence that the safety questions have been settled. Nor do they establish a financial or contractual relationship with a named safety organization.</p>\n<h2>Capital reaches the physical economy</h2>\n<p>On <a href=\"https://a16z.com/why-did-we-raise-15b/\">9 January 2026</a>, Ben Horowitz announced more than $15 billion raised across a16z funds, including $1.176 billion for American Dynamism, $1.7 billion for Infrastructure and $6.75 billion for Growth. These are fund resources, not Marc Andreessen's personal donations or proof that every dollar has been invested.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://a16z.com/the-machine-age-fund/\">Machine Age Fund announcement on 28 August 2026</a> reports $1.1 billion raised for chips, memory, networking, storage, data centers, robotics and other physical AI systems. The sources do not reconcile this fund with January's groups, so the two headlines should not automatically be added.</p>\n<p>The investment mechanism is particularly clear in <a href=\"https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-volta/\">Volta's Series A, announced 4 August 2026</a>, which a16z co-led. The firm's explanation identifies a financing constraint: costly compute infrastructure needs long-term commitments from creditworthy customers, while many startups are funded over shorter periods and cannot make those commitments. Volta proposes combining cloud operations with project finance to extend access. The announcement does not disclose a16z's check, customer contract terms or achieved capacity.</p>\n<p>The model-company connection is direct. <a href=\"https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/\">OpenAI's 31 March 2026 financing announcement</a> names a16z among the co-leads of a round containing $122 billion in committed capital. That figure belongs to the whole round. Neither a16z's investment nor its specific governance rights are disclosed.</p>\n<p>Anduril supplies another connection. Its <a href=\"https://www.anduril.com/article/anduril-raises-usd450-million-in-series-d-funding/\">17 June 2021 Series D announcement</a> names a16z and Founders Fund as participants in a $450 million round led by Elad Gil. This is co-investment in a company. It is not Peter Thiel's personal donation, and it does not demonstrate common operational command.</p>\n<p>That company later announced an operational partnership with another part of the investment landscape. <a href=\"https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-partners-with-openai-to-advance-u-s-artificial-intelligence-leadership-and-protect-u-s\">Anduril and OpenAI's 4 December 2024 announcement</a> describes combining models, Lattice and counter-drone data for national-security applications and operator decision support. It sets out training and deployment intentions, without publishing the full agreement or independently demonstrating every promised capability.</p>\n<h2>Political money needs the correct donor</h2>\n<p>Right for America's <a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/674/202410159687828674/202410159687828674.pdf\">quarterly filing dated 15 October 2024</a>, printed page 6, records a personal contribution: <strong>$2.5 million from Marc Andreessen on 24 July 2024</strong>, transaction SA11A.12495. A16Z is listed as his employer. That field does not turn the firm into the donor. This is one checked receipt, not a complete political-spending total.</p>\n<p>Fairshake requires a different distinction. In its <a href=\"https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/contributing-to-fairshake-pac\">disclosure updated in May and August 2024</a>, a16z reports $47 million in firm contributions to Fairshake and associated PACs. The August correction says founders' names in ownership memo entries are not additional personal gifts. The firm also disclaims control over Fairshake's spending. On <a href=\"https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/a-long-term-view-of-crypto-policy/\">4 November 2024</a>, Chris Dixon announced more than $23 million additional firm support for the 2026 cycle, alongside meetings and introductions between policymakers and entrepreneurs. These are dated donor disclosures, not a fresh audit of all receipts through September 2026.</p>\n<p>The separately reviewed Leading the Future filings record two $25 million a16z contributions, received on 22 August 2025 and 11 February 2026. Greg and Anna Brockman's separate individual contributions are not OpenAI corporate money. A $5 million transfer to Think Big on 24 February 2026 is downstream committee money, not another outside donor contribution. Those distinctions prevent an apparent network total from counting the same money again at each stop. <a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/490/202601309794816490/202601309794816490.pdf\">January filing</a>, <a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/930/202604159857267930/202604159857267930.pdf\">Q1 filing</a>.</p>\n<h2>From a political position to an institutional intervention</h2>\n<p>Andreessen and Horowitz's <a href=\"https://a16z.com/the-little-tech-agenda/\">Little Tech Agenda of 5 July 2024</a> declares a political strategy of supporting or opposing politicians according to their treatment of startups, regardless of party. It connects development policy to manufacturing, energy, defense and market access. That is a stated allocation rule, not an audit proving that every subsequent decision followed it.</p>\n<p>A more concrete intervention is the firm's <a href=\"https://d1lamhf6l6yk6d.cloudfront.net/uploads/2025/03/a16z-National-AI-Action-Plan-OSTP-Submission.pdf\">formal 14 March 2025 submission to OSTP</a>. The document identifies AH Capital Management LLC under the a16z brand. It asks for federal preemption of state restrictions on model development, continued state enforcement against harmful conduct, limited model-disclosure duties, and compute and talent investment. It permits government reuse of the document without attribution. This establishes an organized input into policy development; adoption of its proposals and the firm's causal influence remain separate questions.</p>\n<p>Its <a href=\"https://a16z.com/defense-reform/\">Defense Reform campaign</a> is similarly specific about a market-access objective: commercial acquisition, acquisition-workforce reform and rapid procurement pathways for munitions and autonomous systems. The page cites House and Senate NDAA provisions. It documents advocacy relevant to portfolio companies seeking government customers. The undated page and its references were not reconciled against final legislation, so it cannot support a claim of legislative victory.</p>\n<p>Andreessen's corporate authority is also more specific than a general association. <a href=\"https://investor.atmeta.com/leadership-and-governance/default.aspx\">Meta's governance roster</a> lists him as a director since June 2008 and a Risk &amp; Strategy Committee member. The <a href=\"https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_downloads/2025/06/Meta-Risk-Strategy-Committee-Charter-Effective-June-1-2025.pdf\">charter effective 1 June 2025</a> gives the committee a role reviewing technology, product development and partnerships, recommending how to balance growth and risk, and retaining advisers. Members serve at the board's discretion. These are collective oversight functions, not proof that Andreessen personally directs Meta's model releases.</p>\n<h2>Shared markets and disputed rules</h2>\n<p>A useful synthesis is that a16z works on both technological supply and the conditions under which it can become a market. Funds provide capital. Infrastructure ventures address physical and financing constraints. Policy work addresses legal permission to develop and deploy. Defense advocacy addresses acquisition. Political giving supplies another route into the legislative environment. The records support these mechanisms; they do not establish a quid pro quo among them.</p>\n<p>The coalitions are also less tidy than a division between startups and incumbents. On <a href=\"https://a16z.com/ai-for-startups/\">1 November 2024</a>, Andreessen and Horowitz coauthored an AI policy statement with Microsoft's Satya Nadella and Brad Smith, explicitly proposing collaboration across small and large firms. The later OpenAI financing is another reason not to treat “Little Tech” as a permanent category of company size or a prohibition on incumbent alliances.</p>\n<p>The safety dispute crosses shared commercial markets. <a href=\"https://www.anthropic.com/news/donation-public-first-action\">Anthropic's 21 July 2026 disclosure</a> brings its announced Public First Action support to $40 million. Both donations are restricted to public education and policy and may not influence federal, state or local candidate elections. Anthropic advocates independent evaluation and government power to slow or block seriously dangerous deployments, a materially different allocation of authority from a16z's preferred approach. This is US Public First Action, distinct from the UK Public First consultancy commissioned by CLTR.</p>\n<p>Yet Anthropic also entered defense integration. A <a href=\"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations\">Palantir issuer release distributed 7 November 2024</a> says Claude became accessible in Palantir AIP on AWS that month, including an IL6-accredited environment. That historical access claim does not establish the current contract status after subsequent disputes. It also does not imply a16z financing of Anthropic or control by Palantir's founders.</p>\n<p>The decisive open questions concern the terms that would turn resources into authority: investor-specific rights at OpenAI and Anduril; donor restrictions and allocation authority inside political networks; a traceable path from submitted proposals to adopted rules; and customer obligations underwriting infrastructure. Those are more informative than treating ideological proximity, financing and implementation as interchangeable relationships.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/andreessen-capital-and-policy\">Explore the capital and policy map</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "alex-karp-contracts-and-control",
        "title": "Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access",
        "description": "Founder voting, government orders, model integration, political funding and the limits preserved by the August 2026 Anthropic court ruling.",
        "markdown": "# Alex Karp / Palantir: control, procurement and AI access\n\nEvidence checked 12 September 2026.\n\n## Structural reading\n\nKarp is a useful new node because he sits at the junction of founder voting authority and the commercial machinery that places AI inside state operations. The evidence supports a chain of distinct powers: founders influence corporate direction; procurement offices buy or decline orders; accrediting agencies permit particular environments; cloud providers supply infrastructure; model providers negotiate permitted uses; military customers control operational deployment. The interesting question is how these powers interact, not whether a shared investor or patriotic vocabulary establishes unified command.\n\nPalantir can make rival AI suppliers usable inside government workflows. That gives the company a role in integration, distribution and procurement access. It does not establish that Karp owns the models, selects individual targets, controls partner companies, or directs the government. The strongest new bridge into the existing corpus is Anthropic–Palantir–AWS, complemented by Microsoft/Azure OpenAI. Anduril supplies a second concrete bridge to a16z and the Founders Fund personnel network. These are different edge types.\n\n## Who can decide at Palantir\n\nThe April 24, 2026 proxy identifies Karp as co-founder, CEO since 2005 and director since 2003; Peter Thiel is co-founder/chairman; Stephen Cohen is co-founder/president/director. Class A has one vote per share and Class B ten. All Class F stock sits in the Founder Voting Trust. Subject to the 100 million equity-security threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999% for a matter. It is not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes. All three founders remain parties; matching instructions from at least two determine the bloc. Without matching instructions the specified votes abstain/withhold; the trustee has no voting discretion. This establishes unusual collective founder authority, not Karp's unilateral majority control. Beneficial-ownership tables also include exercisable options and conditional awards, so their holdings should not be relabeled as present votes. [Palantir 2026 DEF 14A](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm).\n\nThe June-quarter filing reports 52% of first-half 2026 revenue from government customers, with approximately $1.5bn from U.S. government customers; these categories are broader than defense. It also identifies countervailing authority: government customers may terminate for convenience, decline options/orders, reduce scope or cancel when appropriations disappear. It warns that AWS/Azure need not renew on favorable terms and could force costly migration. Founder insulation from ordinary shareholder dilution therefore coexists with buyer and hosting dependence. [Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm).\n\n## Procurement: ceilings, orders and actual revenue\n\n| Mechanism | Verified scope and date | What the number means |\n|---|---|---|\n| Army enterprise agreement | Announced July 31, 2025; consolidates 75 contracts: 15 prime and 60 related; up to 10 years | $10bn maximum potential purchasing value, explicitly no specific obligation or commitment. Volume discounts and removal of reseller fees are the stated mechanisms. |\n| Maven original | DoD announcement May 29 2024; W911QX-24-D-0012; one bid; expected completion May 28 2029 | $480m firm-fixed-price prototype contract; funding determined with each order. |\n| Maven modification | Awarded May 20 2025, announced May 21; P00005 on the same contract | $795m modification for software licenses; funding determined per order. It is not proof of $795m paid. |\n| TITAN production | Delivery orders as of Aug31 2026; announced Sep1 | Palantir $127m and Anduril $65m, totaling $192m; eight systems, four Advanced / four Basic, delivery over 18 months. Palantir leads production. These are order values, not cash disbursements. |\n| NATO | NCIA acquisition finalized March 25 2025, announced April 14 | MSS NATO for Allied Command Operations; targeting/intelligence fusion, planning and decision support. No price published in this announcement. |\n\nSources: [Army enterprise agreement announcement](https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency); [DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype](https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/); [DoD contract announcement: Maven modification](https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/); [Army announces TITAN production](https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/); [NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO](https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system).\n\nDo not sum these into a funding total: periods, agencies, contract vehicles and order coverage can overlap. A contract ceiling is purchasing permission; an order is a specified transaction; an obligation is a budgetary commitment; company revenue is recognition under accounting rules. None is interchangeable with the others. The useful follow-up is the order/modification record and rights schedule, including portability and termination assistance, not another headline ceiling.\n\n## AI and access infrastructure\n\nOn August 8 2024, Microsoft and Palantir announced Foundry/AIP integration with Azure OpenAI, including GPT-4 and other models, for defense/intelligence classified environments. Availability was expressly subject to government authorization/accreditation. This is a Microsoft-mediated OpenAI model-distribution bridge, not evidence of a direct OpenAI–Palantir contract or equity relationship. [Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership](https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/).\n\nOn November 7 2024, Anthropic and Palantir announced Claude3/3.5 availability using AIP, Amazon SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment. The issuer's release establishes a supplier/integration relationship. It gives no investment percentage, board seat, control right, exclusivity term or contract price. Current continuation must be qualified by the 2026 dispute below. [Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations). Separately, the current FedRAMP listing for Palantir Federal Cloud Service, identifier FR2434554673, shows certification since November 19 2024, Rev5/Class D(High), ongoing certification and20 ATO/ATU letters. That is an access qualification, not an IL6 determination or an endorsement of a particular operational use. [Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing](https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/).\n\nThe December 6 2024 Anduril/Palantir release proposes Lattice and Menace for tactical data capture/distribution, with AIP structuring and preparing data for AI training/development across classified environments. Its language is a partnership plan; TITAN's later Army order supplies a separate, concrete procurement link. Avoid turning the partnership announcement into proof that every proposed capability is deployed. [Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership](https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security).\n\n## Political money and advocacy\n\nA primary FEC record identifies Alexander Karp's $1m donation to Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc., received December 17 2024. Exact locator: amended Form 13 filed May 2 2025, page 150/327, image 202505029758922685, transaction F132.147400953; the full report starts at image 202505029758922536. This is a personal inaugural donation, not corporate money, a candidate campaign contribution, or proof of an exchanged favor. [Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form 13](https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf).\n\nPalantir's year-end 2025 LD-203, signed Ryan Taylor January 27 2026, names the Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc.PAC. It reports seven September PAC contributions totaling $21,000: Pete Aguilar for Congress $1,000; Building A National Knowledgeable Security PAC $1,500; Mullin for America $2,500; Rob Wittman for Congress $2,500; Heartland Values PAC $3,500; Cole for Congress $5,000; Ken Calvert for Congress Committee $5,000. A separate corporate self-contribution is $50,000 to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute on December 16 2025, classified as presidential-library expenses. Do not mislabel it a Trump donation. This report does not give total lobbying expenditure. [Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203](https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/).\n\nThere is direct policy advocacy evidence: Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar's January 28 2025 Senate Armed Services testimony criticizes defense procurement incentives and commends Wicker's acquisition-reform work and FORGED Act. The witness speaks in his corporate capacity; that neither attributes every recommendation personally to Karp nor proves authorship of enacted provisions. [Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement](https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf).\n\nKarp and Nicholas Zamiska co-authored The Technological Republic, published February 18 2025. The publisher presents their argument as restoring collaboration between software companies and government, with AI competition, defense and Western strategic advantage central to it. This is evidence of their stated project, derived from the publisher's description rather than a full reading of the book. [Publisher: The Technological Republic](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/). Palantir's April 18 2026 X post, [original](https://x.com/PalantirTech/status/2045574398573453312), summarizes that book through the company's own account. A [ThreadReader mirror](https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2045574398573453312.html) supplies the available text; direct access to the original was unavailable. That qualification matters when using its claims of engineering obligation, AI weapons or national service. Corporate amplification is observable; an enforceable obligation does not follow from a manifesto.\n\n## Thiel, Anduril and a16z\n\nThiel's chairmanship and shared founder voting agreement are the hard Karp–Thiel relationship. Common political interests are not needed to prove it, nor do political differences dissolve that formal power.\n\nAndreessen Horowitz publicly announced an Anduril investment on October 3 2019 in Marc Andreessen's bylined statement. It also emphasized defense and intelligence service as legitimate investment targets. This creates a historical investment edge from the a16z group to Anduril; it does not disclose the exact investing legal entity, present stake or voting rights. The existing dataset node a16z is labeled a16z Capital Management for a filed political contribution. Reuse that group-level node only with an explicit legal-entity caveat, or split it during editorial normalization. [Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment](https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/).\n\nFounders Fund's maintained biography identifies Trae Stephens as its partner, Anduril co-founder/executive chairman, and an early Palantir employee who led intelligence/defense and international-growth work. That is an independently documented personnel route connecting the firms. It is not proof that Karp directs Anduril or that Founders Fund controls Palantir. [Founders Fund: Trae Stephens](https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/). The existing Thiel Foundation node must not be merged with Peter Thiel or Founders Fund merely because their names connect.\n\n## Anthropic dispute: current court boundary\n\nThe August 27 2026 Northern District of California opinion in 26-cv-01996-RFL, docket 250, grants Anthropic major constitutional/APA claims. Its factual account provides an unusually important technical distinction: Claude Gov use-policy limits were contractual; Anthropic could not see DoW prompts or technically intervene in the deployed model. Government and prime contractors tested models before deployment; the department controlled when future versions would be deployed. Allegations that Anthropic demanded an operational veto should therefore be attributed to the government's argument, not adopted as established technical authority. See opinion pp 5–6,17,46. [Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket 250](https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250).\n\nThe accompanying four-page final-relief order, docket 251, vacates the section 3252 supply-chain designation and the broad prohibition on defense contractors doing business with Anthropic, and permanently enjoins implementation of the challenged actions against specified defendants. Paragraph 14 expressly preserves lawful actions, including choosing another AI provider; it does not require DoW to use Anthropic. Some claims/defendants were excluded, so this was not an unqualified victory on every claim. [Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket 251](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf).\n\nA separate designation track under 41 USC 4713/FASCSA is identified in September 3 legal commentary. D.C. Circuit cases 26-1049/26-1162 remained in briefing activity in the public mirror last retrieved September 3, including the government's response to Anthropic's August 28 additional-authority letter. No merits disposition is visible in that snapshot. The public mirror is not a September 12 live-PACER record. [D.C. Circuit docket 26-1049, consolidated26-1162](https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049); secondary explanation: [Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations](https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9).\n\nThus neither “Claude is banned everywhere” nor “the court restored every Palantir deployment” is supported. The available evidence establishes a historical integration and current litigation limits; individual operational continuation, replacement and contract terms remain unknown. No source identified here establishes that Karp instigated the designation.\n\n## Unresolved decisions\n\nWhat obligations persist when a classified government customer replaces its model supplier: data portability, ontology mappings, audit records, evaluation gates and termination assistance? The announced partnerships establish integration; the contracts would reveal which participant can withhold what, and at what cost.\n\nDoes concentrated founder voting change the company's willingness to accept controversial government business when ordinary shareholders object? The structure permits founder resistance to shareholder pressure; establishing an actual causal episode requires a particular vote, board decision or rejected proposal, not inference from the charter alone.\n\n",
        "html": "<h2>Alex Karp / Palantir: control, procurement and AI access</h2>\n<p>Evidence checked 12 September 2026.</p>\n<h3>Structural reading</h3>\n<p>Karp is a useful new node because he sits at the junction of founder voting authority and the commercial machinery that places AI inside state operations. The evidence supports a chain of distinct powers: founders influence corporate direction; procurement offices buy or decline orders; accrediting agencies permit particular environments; cloud providers supply infrastructure; model providers negotiate permitted uses; military customers control operational deployment. The interesting question is how these powers interact, not whether a shared investor or patriotic vocabulary establishes unified command.</p>\n<p>Palantir can make rival AI suppliers usable inside government workflows. That gives the company a role in integration, distribution and procurement access. It does not establish that Karp owns the models, selects individual targets, controls partner companies, or directs the government. The strongest new bridge into the existing corpus is Anthropic–Palantir–AWS, complemented by Microsoft/Azure OpenAI. Anduril supplies a second concrete bridge to a16z and the Founders Fund personnel network. These are different edge types.</p>\n<h3>Who can decide at Palantir</h3>\n<p>The April 24, 2026 proxy identifies Karp as co-founder, CEO since 2005 and director since 2003; Peter Thiel is co-founder/chairman; Stephen Cohen is co-founder/president/director. Class A has one vote per share and Class B ten. All Class F stock sits in the Founder Voting Trust. Subject to the 100 million equity-security threshold, the mechanism generally brings specified founder-related votes to 49.999999% for a matter. It is not an extra 49.999999% added to the same A/B votes. All three founders remain parties; matching instructions from at least two determine the bloc. Without matching instructions the specified votes abstain/withhold; the trustee has no voting discretion. This establishes unusual collective founder authority, not Karp's unilateral majority control. Beneficial-ownership tables also include exercisable options and conditional awards, so their holdings should not be relabeled as present votes. <a href=\"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm\">Palantir 2026 DEF 14A</a>.</p>\n<p>The June-quarter filing reports 52% of first-half 2026 revenue from government customers, with approximately $1.5bn from U.S. government customers; these categories are broader than defense. It also identifies countervailing authority: government customers may terminate for convenience, decline options/orders, reduce scope or cancel when appropriations disappear. It warns that AWS/Azure need not renew on favorable terms and could force costly migration. Founder insulation from ordinary shareholder dilution therefore coexists with buyer and hosting dependence. <a href=\"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000041/pltr-20260630.htm\">Palantir Q2 2026 Form 10-Q</a>.</p>\n<h3>Procurement: ceilings, orders and actual revenue</h3>\n<table><tr><th>Mechanism</th><th>Verified scope and date</th><th>What the number means</th></tr><tr><td>Army enterprise agreement</td><td>Announced July 31, 2025; consolidates 75 contracts: 15 prime and 60 related; up to 10 years</td><td>$10bn maximum potential purchasing value, explicitly no specific obligation or commitment. Volume discounts and removal of reseller fees are the stated mechanisms.</td></tr><tr><td>Maven original</td><td>DoD announcement May 29 2024; W911QX-24-D-0012; one bid; expected completion May 28 2029</td><td>$480m firm-fixed-price prototype contract; funding determined with each order.</td></tr><tr><td>Maven modification</td><td>Awarded May 20 2025, announced May 21; P00005 on the same contract</td><td>$795m modification for software licenses; funding determined per order. It is not proof of $795m paid.</td></tr><tr><td>TITAN production</td><td>Delivery orders as of Aug31 2026; announced Sep1</td><td>Palantir $127m and Anduril $65m, totaling $192m; eight systems, four Advanced / four Basic, delivery over 18 months. Palantir leads production. These are order values, not cash disbursements.</td></tr><tr><td>NATO</td><td>NCIA acquisition finalized March 25 2025, announced April 14</td><td>MSS NATO for Allied Command Operations; targeting/intelligence fusion, planning and decision support. No price published in this announcement.</td></tr></table>\n<p>Sources: <a href=\"https://www.army.mil/article/287506/u_s_army_awards_enterprise_service_agreement_to_enhance_military_readiness_and_drive_operational_efficiency\">Army enterprise agreement announcement</a>; <a href=\"https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3790490/contracts-for-may-29-2024/\">DoD contract announcement: Maven prototype</a>; <a href=\"https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/contracts-for-may-21-2025/\">DoD contract announcement: Maven modification</a>; <a href=\"https://cpeisw.army.mil/2026/09/01/army-announces-move-to-production-for-titan/\">Army announces TITAN production</a>; <a href=\"https://www.ncia.nato.int/newsroom/news/nato-acquires-aienabled-warfighting-system\">NCIA acquisition of MSS NATO</a>.</p>\n<p>Do not sum these into a funding total: periods, agencies, contract vehicles and order coverage can overlap. A contract ceiling is purchasing permission; an order is a specified transaction; an obligation is a budgetary commitment; company revenue is recognition under accounting rules. None is interchangeable with the others. The useful follow-up is the order/modification record and rights schedule, including portability and termination assistance, not another headline ceiling.</p>\n<h3>AI and access infrastructure</h3>\n<p>On August 8 2024, Microsoft and Palantir announced Foundry/AIP integration with Azure OpenAI, including GPT-4 and other models, for defense/intelligence classified environments. Availability was expressly subject to government authorization/accreditation. This is a Microsoft-mediated OpenAI model-distribution bridge, not evidence of a direct OpenAI–Palantir contract or equity relationship. <a href=\"https://news.microsoft.com/source/2024/08/08/palantir-and-microsoft-partner-to-deliver-enhanced-analytics-and-ai-services-to-classified-networks-for-critical-national-security-operations/\">Microsoft and Palantir classified AI partnership</a>.</p>\n<p>On November 7 2024, Anthropic and Palantir announced Claude3/3.5 availability using AIP, Amazon SageMaker and an AWS-supported IL6 environment. The issuer's release establishes a supplier/integration relationship. It gives no investment percentage, board seat, control right, exclusivity term or contract price. Current continuation must be qualified by the 2026 dispute below. <a href=\"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241107699415/en/Anthropic-and-Palantir-Partner-to-Bring-Claude-AI-Models-to-AWS-for-U.S.-Government-Intelligence-and-Defense-Operations\">Anthropic and Palantir announce Claude via AWS</a>. Separately, the current FedRAMP listing for Palantir Federal Cloud Service, identifier FR2434554673, shows certification since November 19 2024, Rev5/Class D(High), ongoing certification and20 ATO/ATU letters. That is an access qualification, not an IL6 determination or an endorsement of a particular operational use. <a href=\"https://www.fedramp.gov/marketplace/products/FR2434554673/\">Palantir Federal Cloud Service marketplace listing</a>.</p>\n<p>The December 6 2024 Anduril/Palantir release proposes Lattice and Menace for tactical data capture/distribution, with AIP structuring and preparing data for AI training/development across classified environments. Its language is a partnership plan; TITAN's later Army order supplies a separate, concrete procurement link. Avoid turning the partnership announcement into proof that every proposed capability is deployed. <a href=\"https://markets.financialcontent.com/wss/article/bizwire-2024-12-6-anduril-and-palantir-to-accelerate-ai-capabilities-for-national-security\">Anduril and Palantir AI capabilities partnership</a>.</p>\n<h3>Political money and advocacy</h3>\n<p>A primary FEC record identifies Alexander Karp's $1m donation to Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc., received December 17 2024. Exact locator: amended Form 13 filed May 2 2025, page 150/327, image 202505029758922685, transaction F132.147400953; the full report starts at image 202505029758922536. This is a personal inaugural donation, not corporate money, a candidate campaign contribution, or proof of an exchanged favor. <a href=\"https://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/536/202505029758922536/202505029758922536.pdf\">Trump Vance Inaugural Committee amended Form 13</a>.</p>\n<p>Palantir's year-end 2025 LD-203, signed Ryan Taylor January 27 2026, names the Employees of Palantir Technologies Inc.PAC. It reports seven September PAC contributions totaling $21,000: Pete Aguilar for Congress $1,000; Building A National Knowledgeable Security PAC $1,500; Mullin for America $2,500; Rob Wittman for Congress $2,500; Heartland Values PAC $3,500; Cole for Congress $5,000; Ken Calvert for Congress Committee $5,000. A separate corporate self-contribution is $50,000 to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute on December 16 2025, classified as presidential-library expenses. Do not mislabel it a Trump donation. This report does not give total lobbying expenditure. <a href=\"https://lda.gov/filings/public/contribution/810e27dc-0359-4d63-ae22-0c36db7d7eaf/print/\">Palantir 2025 year-end LD-203</a>.</p>\n<p>There is direct policy advocacy evidence: Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar's January 28 2025 Senate Armed Services testimony criticizes defense procurement incentives and commends Wicker's acquisition-reform work and FORGED Act. The witness speaks in his corporate capacity; that neither attributes every recommendation personally to Karp nor proves authorship of enacted provisions. <a href=\"https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/sankar_opening_statement.pdf\">Shyam Sankar Senate Armed Services opening statement</a>.</p>\n<p>Karp and Nicholas Zamiska co-authored The Technological Republic, published February 18 2025. The publisher presents their argument as restoring collaboration between software companies and government, with AI competition, defense and Western strategic advantage central to it. This is evidence of their stated project, derived from the publisher's description rather than a full reading of the book. <a href=\"https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/760945/the-technological-republic-by-alexander-c-karp-and-nicholas-w-zamiska/9780593798690/\">Publisher: The Technological Republic</a>. Palantir's April 18 2026 X post, <a href=\"https://x.com/PalantirTech/status/2045574398573453312\">original</a>, summarizes that book through the company's own account. A <a href=\"https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2045574398573453312.html\">ThreadReader mirror</a> supplies the available text; direct access to the original was unavailable. That qualification matters when using its claims of engineering obligation, AI weapons or national service. Corporate amplification is observable; an enforceable obligation does not follow from a manifesto.</p>\n<h3>Thiel, Anduril and a16z</h3>\n<p>Thiel's chairmanship and shared founder voting agreement are the hard Karp–Thiel relationship. Common political interests are not needed to prove it, nor do political differences dissolve that formal power.</p>\n<p>Andreessen Horowitz publicly announced an Anduril investment on October 3 2019 in Marc Andreessen's bylined statement. It also emphasized defense and intelligence service as legitimate investment targets. This creates a historical investment edge from the a16z group to Anduril; it does not disclose the exact investing legal entity, present stake or voting rights. The existing dataset node a16z is labeled a16z Capital Management for a filed political contribution. Reuse that group-level node only with an explicit legal-entity caveat, or split it during editorial normalization. <a href=\"https://a16z.com/announcement/anduril/\">Marc Andreessen announces Anduril investment</a>.</p>\n<p>Founders Fund's maintained biography identifies Trae Stephens as its partner, Anduril co-founder/executive chairman, and an early Palantir employee who led intelligence/defense and international-growth work. That is an independently documented personnel route connecting the firms. It is not proof that Karp directs Anduril or that Founders Fund controls Palantir. <a href=\"https://foundersfund.com/team/trae-stephens/\">Founders Fund: Trae Stephens</a>. The existing Thiel Foundation node must not be merged with Peter Thiel or Founders Fund merely because their names connect.</p>\n<h3>Anthropic dispute: current court boundary</h3>\n<p>The August 27 2026 Northern District of California opinion in 26-cv-01996-RFL, docket 250, grants Anthropic major constitutional/APA claims. Its factual account provides an unusually important technical distinction: Claude Gov use-policy limits were contractual; Anthropic could not see DoW prompts or technically intervene in the deployed model. Government and prime contractors tested models before deployment; the department controlled when future versions would be deployed. Allegations that Anthropic demanded an operational veto should therefore be attributed to the government's argument, not adopted as established technical authority. See opinion pp 5–6,17,46. <a href=\"https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250\">Anthropic v DoW summary-judgment opinion, docket 250</a>.</p>\n<p>The accompanying four-page final-relief order, docket 251, vacates the section 3252 supply-chain designation and the broad prohibition on defense contractors doing business with Anthropic, and permanently enjoins implementation of the challenged actions against specified defendants. Paragraph 14 expressly preserves lawful actions, including choosing another AI provider; it does not require DoW to use Anthropic. Some claims/defendants were excluded, so this was not an unqualified victory on every claim. <a href=\"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf\">Anthropic v DoW order of final relief, docket 251</a>.</p>\n<p>A separate designation track under 41 USC 4713/FASCSA is identified in September 3 legal commentary. D.C. Circuit cases 26-1049/26-1162 remained in briefing activity in the public mirror last retrieved September 3, including the government's response to Anthropic's August 28 additional-authority letter. No merits disposition is visible in that snapshot. The public mirror is not a September 12 live-PACER record. <a href=\"https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/26-1049\">D.C. Circuit docket 26-1049, consolidated26-1162</a>; secondary explanation: <a href=\"https://www.joneswalker.com/en/insights/blogs/ai-law-blog/national-security-is-not-a-blank-check-an-ai-model-retaliation-ruling-and-the.html?id=102nzx9\">Jones Walker analysis of parallel designations</a>.</p>\n<p>Thus neither “Claude is banned everywhere” nor “the court restored every Palantir deployment” is supported. The available evidence establishes a historical integration and current litigation limits; individual operational continuation, replacement and contract terms remain unknown. No source identified here establishes that Karp instigated the designation.</p>\n<h3>Unresolved decisions</h3>\n<p>What obligations persist when a classified government customer replaces its model supplier: data portability, ontology mappings, audit records, evaluation gates and termination assistance? The announced partnerships establish integration; the contracts would reveal which participant can withhold what, and at what cost.</p>\n<p>Does concentrated founder voting change the company's willingness to accept controversial government business when ordinary shareholders object? The structure permits founder resistance to shareholder pressure; establishing an actual causal episode requires a particular vote, board decision or rejected proposal, not inference from the charter alone.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions",
        "title": "Funding policy work and organizing",
        "description": "CLTR commitments and policy proposals, PauseAI eligibility conditions, and the distinct powers they create.",
        "html": "<p>Checked 12 September 2026.</p><h2>Who gets resources, and on what terms?</h2><p>The useful next question after finding a donor is what the money enables and what obligations accompany it. This pass found two distinct arrangements: substantial support for a policy organization that asserts strategic independence, and smaller recurring support whose published conditions explicitly require alignment with an organizing movement’s priorities.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf\">CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025</a> · <a href=\"https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/\">CLTR: support our work</a></p><h2>CLTR: funded capacity, stated independence</h2><p>CLTR’s report, published in 2025, describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment plus matching up to £3m. It says grant commitments deny funders influence over strategy. Its current support page separately offers expert access and advocacy opportunities. Together these disclose resources and relationship benefits; neither a bank receipt nor a hidden donor veto has been established.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf\">CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025</a> · <a href=\"https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/\">CLTR: support our work</a></p><h2>What that policy capacity produces</h2><p>The April 2026 parliamentary submission proposes Cabinet Office AI coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. These are intelligible destinations for institutional capacity: people writing recommendations for who should make which public decisions. Parliamentary publication makes the proposals public; it does not adopt them.</p><p><a href=\"https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/\">CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee</a> · <a href=\"https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6\">National Resilience Committee: written evidence index</a></p><h2>PauseAI: recurring support has conditions</h2><p>The stipend rules require agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities. The microgrant rules connect delivery and reporting to future eligibility. Those conditions are a firmer basis for understanding obligation than assuming that everyone sharing a donor takes instructions from them. Individual agreements and actual decisions remain the missing evidence.</p><p><a href=\"https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends\">PauseAI: volunteer stipends</a> · <a href=\"https://pauseai.org/microgrants\">PauseAI: microgrants</a></p><h2>The forest</h2><p>Power here moves through several bargains. Funders support capacity; organizations provide expertise, access or outputs; public bodies decide what to adopt; campaign organizations condition future support. Some arrangements protect independence and others explicitly narrow discretion. A useful map must preserve that variation, because it tells us where decisions can actually be made—and challenged.</p>",
        "markdown": "# Funding policy work and organizing\n\nChecked 12 September 2026.\n\n## Who gets resources, and on what terms?\n\nThe useful next question after finding a donor is what the money enables and what obligations accompany it. This pass found two distinct arrangements: substantial support for a policy organization that asserts strategic independence, and smaller recurring support whose published conditions explicitly require alignment with an organizing movement’s priorities.\n\nSources: [CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025](https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf), [CLTR: support our work](https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/)\n\n## CLTR: funded capacity, stated independence\n\nCLTR’s report, published in 2025, describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment plus matching up to £3m. It says grant commitments deny funders influence over strategy. Its current support page separately offers expert access and advocacy opportunities. Together these disclose resources and relationship benefits; neither a bank receipt nor a hidden donor veto has been established.\n\nSources: [CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025](https://www.longtermresilience.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/CLTR-Annual-Report-2024.pdf), [CLTR: support our work](https://www.longtermresilience.org/support-us/)\n\n## What that policy capacity produces\n\nThe April 2026 parliamentary submission proposes Cabinet Office AI coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. These are intelligible destinations for institutional capacity: people writing recommendations for who should make which public decisions. Parliamentary publication makes the proposals public; it does not adopt them.\n\nSources: [CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee](https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/165880/html/), [National Resilience Committee: written evidence index](https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/832/national-resilience-committee/publications/written-evidence/?page=6)\n\n## PauseAI: recurring support has conditions\n\nThe stipend rules require agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities. The microgrant rules connect delivery and reporting to future eligibility. Those conditions are a firmer basis for understanding obligation than assuming that everyone sharing a donor takes instructions from them. Individual agreements and actual decisions remain the missing evidence.\n\nSources: [PauseAI: volunteer stipends](https://pauseai.org/volunteer-stipends), [PauseAI: microgrants](https://pauseai.org/microgrants)\n\n## The forest\n\nPower here moves through several bargains. Funders support capacity; organizations provide expertise, access or outputs; public bodies decide what to adopt; campaign organizations condition future support. Some arrangements protect independence and others explicitly narrow discretion. A useful map must preserve that variation, because it tells us where decisions can actually be made—and challenged.\n\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "money-audiences-and-decision-rights",
        "title": "Money, audiences and decision rights",
        "description": "A synthesis of the Civic Shout, Andreessen, Karp and Tallinn follow-up: how resources become decisions and obligations.",
        "html": "<p>Research synthesis, 12 September 2026. Interpretations below distinguish the documented mechanisms from the open questions.</p><h2>The question is becoming more precise</h2><p>The investigation now follows several kinds of institutional power: financing work, choosing who participates, shaping a policy proposal, controlling company votes, procuring a system and deciding how it may be used. Those powers can reinforce one another, but they are held by different people under different rules. The next useful unit of analysis is the decision: who can make it, what resources it requires, whose agreement matters, and what can reverse it.</p><h2>Persuasion can also be a business transaction</h2><p>Civic Shout sells opted-in supporters and traffic. Its platform rules decide campaign admission, attribution and credits; its Foundation offers philanthropy-funded audience growth. The AI petition therefore sits inside an identifiable distribution business. That supplies concrete incentives for circulation without establishing who financed this particular petition or that any signer was deceived. The newly listed Action Collective is not Collective Shout; no relationship between Civic Shout and the Australian organization was established in this pass.</p><p><a href=\"/research/civic-shout-business-and-incentives\">Civic Shout: findings and source records</a> · <a href=\"/maps/civic-shout-business\">Civic Shout: business map</a></p><h2>Rival policy camps can share commercial infrastructure</h2><p>Andreessen advocates faster AI development while his firm invests, contributes to political committees and submits specific policy recommendations. Palantir integrates models and sells systems into government. Anthropic has also supplied that defense market while disputing conditions of use. Commercial overlap and political disagreement are both real parts of this picture. Neither licenses the inference that the participants share a single strategy.</p><p><a href=\"/research/marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy\">Andreessen: capital and policy</a> · <a href=\"/research/alex-karp-contracts-and-control\">Karp: contracts and control</a></p><h2>A contractual red line is not necessarily a technical off switch</h2><p>The August 27, 2026 district-court opinion describes Claude Gov usage limits as contractual and says Anthropic could not inspect government prompts or intervene technologically in deployed model behavior. The court rejected the challenged government actions on major constitutional and administrative-law grounds; the relief preserved lawful choices of another vendor. A separate designation track and individual deployment status remain unresolved in this pass. This is a sharp example of companies, customers and courts possessing different powers, rather than one actor possessing every switch.</p><p><a href=\"https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250\">Court opinion, docket 250</a> · <a href=\"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf\">Order of final relief, docket 251</a></p><h2>Follow the terms that turn resources into obligation</h2><p>Frame’s recipient-edited disclosure adds a $20,000 grant labeled “Jaan Tallin (DAF)” and a $280,000 AISTOF grant assigned to its first cohort. CLTR reports a multi-year philanthropic commitment while asserting donor independence; PauseAI publishes conditions tying continuing support to contributions and organizational priorities. The differences matter. A donor link identifies support; a grant agreement, selection rule or renewal condition reveals what influence accompanies it.</p><p><a href=\"/entity/frame\">Frame and the new recipient disclosure</a> · <a href=\"/research/policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions\">Policy funding and organizing conditions</a></p><h2>What would change the picture next</h2><p>The most revealing missing records are specific: Civic Shout’s ownership and the AI petition’s campaign account; the Frame grant agreements and named donor-advised fund; CLTR’s executed funding terms and government drafting correspondence; a16z’s investment rights and political-committee allocation rules; and the government integration contracts governing portability, replacement and evaluation. These records could show delegated authority, bargaining limits or independence. Another shared name would answer much less.</p>",
        "markdown": "# Money, audiences and decision rights\n\nResearch synthesis, 12 September 2026. Interpretations below distinguish the documented mechanisms from the open questions.\n\n## The question is becoming more precise\n\nThe investigation now follows several kinds of institutional power: financing work, choosing who participates, shaping a policy proposal, controlling company votes, procuring a system and deciding how it may be used. Those powers can reinforce one another, but they are held by different people under different rules. The next useful unit of analysis is the decision: who can make it, what resources it requires, whose agreement matters, and what can reverse it.\n\n## Persuasion can also be a business transaction\n\nCivic Shout sells opted-in supporters and traffic. Its platform rules decide campaign admission, attribution and credits; its Foundation offers philanthropy-funded audience growth. The AI petition therefore sits inside an identifiable distribution business. That supplies concrete incentives for circulation without establishing who financed this particular petition or that any signer was deceived. The newly listed Action Collective is not Collective Shout; no relationship between Civic Shout and the Australian organization was established in this pass.\n\n[Civic Shout: findings and source records](/research/civic-shout-business-and-incentives) · [Civic Shout: business map](/maps/civic-shout-business)\n\n## Rival policy camps can share commercial infrastructure\n\nAndreessen advocates faster AI development while his firm invests, contributes to political committees and submits specific policy recommendations. Palantir integrates models and sells systems into government. Anthropic has also supplied that defense market while disputing conditions of use. Commercial overlap and political disagreement are both real parts of this picture. Neither licenses the inference that the participants share a single strategy.\n\n[Andreessen: capital and policy](/research/marc-andreessen-capital-and-policy) · [Karp: contracts and control](/research/alex-karp-contracts-and-control)\n\n## A contractual red line is not necessarily a technical off switch\n\nThe August 27, 2026 district-court opinion describes Claude Gov usage limits as contractual and says Anthropic could not inspect government prompts or intervene technologically in deployed model behavior. The court rejected the challenged government actions on major constitutional and administrative-law grounds; the relief preserved lawful choices of another vendor. A separate designation track and individual deployment status remain unresolved in this pass. This is a sharp example of companies, customers and courts possessing different powers, rather than one actor possessing every switch.\n\n[Court opinion, docket 250](https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2026cv01996/465515/250) · [Order of final relief, docket 251](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.251.0.pdf)\n\n## Follow the terms that turn resources into obligation\n\nFrame’s recipient-edited disclosure adds a $20,000 grant labeled “Jaan Tallin (DAF)” and a $280,000 AISTOF grant assigned to its first cohort. CLTR reports a multi-year philanthropic commitment while asserting donor independence; PauseAI publishes conditions tying continuing support to contributions and organizational priorities. The differences matter. A donor link identifies support; a grant agreement, selection rule or renewal condition reveals what influence accompanies it.\n\n[Frame and the new recipient disclosure](/entity/frame) · [Policy funding and organizing conditions](/research/policy-funding-and-organizing-conditions)\n\n## What would change the picture next\n\nThe most revealing missing records are specific: Civic Shout’s ownership and the AI petition’s campaign account; the Frame grant agreements and named donor-advised fund; CLTR’s executed funding terms and government drafting correspondence; a16z’s investment rights and political-committee allocation rules; and the government integration contracts governing portability, replacement and evaluation. These records could show delegated authority, bargaining limits or independence. Another shared name would answer much less.\n\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "controlai-us-lobbying-records",
        "title": "ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation",
        "description": "Quarterly costs, named lobbyists and a disclosed UK-US institutional link.",
        "markdown": "# ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation\n\nResearched 13 September 2026. These are newly acquired older filings, not newly announced September spending.\n\nUS filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation. [First-quarter report](https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/); [second-quarter report](https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/).\n\nThe [initial registration](https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/) became effective July 1, 2025 and names Max Hernandez-Zapata, disclosing his earlier job as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins. Connor Leahy appears alongside him in both 2026 quarterly reports. [Nathan Morrison’s March19 registration](https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/) identifies a consulting relationship with Control AI US; the second-quarter report also names him.\n\nThe lobbying issues are artificial superintelligence and loss-of-control risks, and the listed audiences are the House and Senate. The reports do not identify individual meetings or say who wrote the Sanders-Casar proposal. They establish a financed, staffed advocacy operation rather than merely a collection of sympathetic voices.\n\nForeign-entity disclosures identify Secure Future Research Ltd. The registration reports a USD25,000 contribution entry and 0% ownership; Morrison’s separate form has a USD5,000 entry. The form allows several grounds for foreign-entity disclosure. Those entries do not identify an exact transfer date, establish UK-government sponsorship, or settle the terms of UK-US direction.\n\n## What would reveal more\n\nThe highest-value missing records are consulting and intercompany agreements, the reporting workpapers behind expenses, and named-office meeting or drafting records. Those would connect the disclosed operation to specific activities and decisions.\n",
        "html": "<h1>ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation</h1>\n<p>Researched 13 September 2026. These are newly acquired older filings, not newly announced September spending.</p>\n<p>US filings turn the campaign into a more concrete operating structure: a US legal entity reports lobbying expenses, named lobbyists and work directed at Congress. Control AI US reported USD120,000 for Q1 and USD80,000 for Q2 2026. The US reports identify Secure Future Research in their foreign-interest disclosures. The two quarters sum to USD200,000 in rounded expense estimates; contractor disclosures and foreign-entity contribution entries must not be added as independent spending without reconciliation. <a href=\"https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/274a03b6-5086-4c8b-802f-003865436f37/print/\">First-quarter report</a>; <a href=\"https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/9b928c60-327c-47f7-9add-ac736a2fccf7/print/\">second-quarter report</a>.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/66fdbb45-e0c5-4487-b779-063917e7bda4/print/\">initial registration</a> became effective July 1, 2025 and names Max Hernandez-Zapata, disclosing his earlier job as a legislative assistant to Representative Brian Higgins. Connor Leahy appears alongside him in both 2026 quarterly reports. <a href=\"https://lda.gov/filings/public/filing/5822c8aa-0ec7-4fcb-8649-dab9d8f07406/print/\">Nathan Morrison’s March19 registration</a> identifies a consulting relationship with Control AI US; the second-quarter report also names him.</p>\n<p>The lobbying issues are artificial superintelligence and loss-of-control risks, and the listed audiences are the House and Senate. The reports do not identify individual meetings or say who wrote the Sanders-Casar proposal. They establish a financed, staffed advocacy operation rather than merely a collection of sympathetic voices.</p>\n<p>Foreign-entity disclosures identify Secure Future Research Ltd. The registration reports a USD25,000 contribution entry and 0% ownership; Morrison’s separate form has a USD5,000 entry. The form allows several grounds for foreign-entity disclosure. Those entries do not identify an exact transfer date, establish UK-government sponsorship, or settle the terms of UK-US direction.</p>\n<h2>What would reveal more</h2>\n<p>The highest-value missing records are consulting and intercompany agreements, the reporting workpapers behind expenses, and named-office meeting or drafting records. Those would connect the disclosed operation to specific activities and decisions.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "california-ai-auditors-enacted",
        "title": "California’s AI auditor laws are enacted",
        "description": "Who qualifies evaluators, who pays them and how the new registration regime will operate.",
        "markdown": "# California’s AI auditor laws are enacted\n\nResearched 13 September 2026. Both bills were approved and filed on September9. This corrects the earlier entry, which recorded enrollment and unconfirmed enactment.\n\nCalifornia has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service. [SB813, Chapter179](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813); [AB1405, Chapter178](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405).\n\nSB813 requires GovOps to consider expertise, independence and financial conflicts. An assessed company may pay market rates, but the fee cannot depend on the result. Working groups must include engineers from competing AI companies and AI-safety experts. Designated organizations report methodology and relevant governance or funding changes. These are consequential rule-writing and qualification roles, with appointments and implementation still to follow.\n\nAB1405 supplies the adjacent market-entry mechanism: from January1,2029, offering, selling or conducting a covered AI audit requires registration. Annual fees support administration, and a public channel receives misconduct complaints. GovOps can remove auditors and refer violations. The law also uses existing professional-accountancy standards and the California Board of Accountancy for specified qualified work and misconduct investigations.\n\n[OpenAI publicly endorsed both bills](https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/). This complicates a simple government-versus-labs account: a major developer supports rules for the outside evaluators who could assess it. The text and endorsement establish an institutional design and advocacy position; the next question is how appointments, standards and actual contracts distribute discretion.\n\n## What to follow next\n\nWatch GovOps working-group membership, designation requirements, registry implementation, fees and professional-equivalence criteria. Keep the 2028 and 2029 deadlines visible as future milestones. No particular company is identified here as an appointed IVO or registered auditor.\n\nThe laws’ general effective date is January1,2027; qualification and registry deadlines come later. SB813’s author expressly identifies the January2027 date, while AB1405 follows the ordinary non-urgency rule. [Author announcement](https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/newsom-signs-mcnerneys-landmark-bill-assess-artificial-intelligence-safety-risks).\n\n[Ordinary effective-date rule, ArticleIV section8(c)(1)](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=IV).\n",
        "html": "<h1>California’s AI auditor laws are enacted</h1>\n<p>Researched 13 September 2026. Both bills were approved and filed on September9. This corrects the earlier entry, which recorded enrollment and unconfirmed enactment.</p>\n<p>California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service. <a href=\"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB813\">SB813, Chapter179</a>; <a href=\"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1405\">AB1405, Chapter178</a>.</p>\n<p>SB813 requires GovOps to consider expertise, independence and financial conflicts. An assessed company may pay market rates, but the fee cannot depend on the result. Working groups must include engineers from competing AI companies and AI-safety experts. Designated organizations report methodology and relevant governance or funding changes. These are consequential rule-writing and qualification roles, with appointments and implementation still to follow.</p>\n<p>AB1405 supplies the adjacent market-entry mechanism: from January1,2029, offering, selling or conducting a covered AI audit requires registration. Annual fees support administration, and a public channel receives misconduct complaints. GovOps can remove auditors and refer violations. The law also uses existing professional-accountancy standards and the California Board of Accountancy for specified qualified work and misconduct investigations.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://openai.com/index/ai-policy-window/\">OpenAI publicly endorsed both bills</a>. This complicates a simple government-versus-labs account: a major developer supports rules for the outside evaluators who could assess it. The text and endorsement establish an institutional design and advocacy position; the next question is how appointments, standards and actual contracts distribute discretion.</p>\n<h2>What to follow next</h2>\n<p>Watch GovOps working-group membership, designation requirements, registry implementation, fees and professional-equivalence criteria. Keep the 2028 and 2029 deadlines visible as future milestones. No particular company is identified here as an appointed IVO or registered auditor.</p><p>The laws’ general effective date is January1,2027; qualification and registry deadlines come later. SB813’s author expressly identifies the January2027 date, while AB1405 follows the ordinary non-urgency rule. <a href=\"https://sd05.senate.ca.gov/news/newsom-signs-mcnerneys-landmark-bill-assess-artificial-intelligence-safety-risks\">Author announcement</a>.</p><p><a href=\"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=IV\">Ordinary effective-date rule, Article IV section8(c)(1)</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "frontier-pacing-and-evaluator-access",
        "title": "Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside",
        "description": "Anthropic’s announcement would put outside reviewers inside the company and underpin wider coordination.",
        "markdown": "# Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside\n\nIn September 2026, Dario Amodei committed Anthropic to ongoing outside reviewers with access comparable to internal risk staff. He proposed shared industry standards and government-supported coordination next. The planned reviewers could publish findings, with specified redactions; METR appears as an example, not an appointment. The contract, selected team and practical handling of access disputes remain the decisive missing records. [Read Amodei’s essay](https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier).\n\nAdded 13 September2026 to close a gap between the discussion and the public corpus. The primary essay gives a month, not a publication day. The graph records an announced commitment and preserves that date precision.\n\n\n## The White House pulls in a different direction\n\nAP reports that Trump resisted AI slowdown calls in Ireland on September 13, citing competition with China while allowing for guardrails. [AP report](https://apnews.com/article/9df0ebb4c1b0619aa0f88057b5a1092d).\n\nThis puts national competition in tension with the labs' proposed collective pacing. The available exchange establishes a public stance; it does not establish a formal decision on the particular Amodei plan. The original complete question and answer remain a follow-up target.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside</h1>\n<p>In September 2026, Dario Amodei committed Anthropic to ongoing outside reviewers with access comparable to internal risk staff. He proposed shared industry standards and government-supported coordination next. The planned reviewers could publish findings, with specified redactions; METR appears as an example, not an appointment. The contract, selected team and practical handling of access disputes remain the decisive missing records. <a href=\"https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier\">Read Amodei’s essay</a>.</p>\n<p>Added 13 September2026 to close a gap between the discussion and the public corpus. The primary essay gives a month, not a publication day. The graph records an announced commitment and preserves that date precision.</p><h2>The White House pulls in a different direction</h2><p>AP reports that Trump resisted AI slowdown calls in Ireland on September 13, citing competition with China while allowing for guardrails. <a href=\"https://apnews.com/article/9df0ebb4c1b0619aa0f88057b5a1092d\">AP report</a>.</p><p>This puts national competition in tension with the labs&#x27; proposed collective pacing. The available exchange establishes a public stance; it does not establish a formal decision on the particular Amodei plan. The original complete question and answer remain a follow-up target.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "australia-duty-care-parliament-negotiation",
        "title": "Australia: who gets to define the next online harm?",
        "description": "Wells offers negotiation over Parliament’s role in adding duty-of-care harms.",
        "markdown": "# Australia: who gets to define the next online harm?\n\nOn 13 September2026, Anika Wells offered to negotiate wording that would give Parliament a role in deciding new duty-of-care harm categories, while retaining an urgent-response mechanism. She was answering David Speers on ABC Insiders. This is a public negotiating position: the revised or introduced bill must establish whether and how the proposed ministerial power changes. [Official transcript](https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers).\n\nThe live argument concerns who may extend the set of obligations after the main legislation is passed. A ministerial rulemaking power and a parliamentary decision expose the change to different forms of scrutiny. The offer is evidence of that contest, not its settlement.\n\nThe next decisive record is the revised draft or introduced bill, read alongside any Coalition amendment. Preserve the existing exposure draft and its consultation tests until a later text replaces them.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Australia: who gets to define the next online harm?</h1><p>On 13 September2026, Anika Wells offered to negotiate wording that would give Parliament a role in deciding new duty-of-care harm categories, while retaining an urgent-response mechanism. She was answering David Speers on ABC Insiders. This is a public negotiating position: the revised or introduced bill must establish whether and how the proposed ministerial power changes. <a href=\"https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/transcript/abc-insiders-david-speers\">Official transcript</a>.</p><p>The live argument concerns who may extend obligations after the main legislation is passed. Ministerial rulemaking and parliamentary decisions expose changes to different forms of scrutiny. The next decisive record is the revised draft or introduced bill, alongside any Coalition amendment.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "basi-open-research-and-institutional-power",
        "title": "BASI: the outsiders testing the inside",
        "description": "Open AI experimentation meets grants, collective research and frontier-lab evaluation.",
        "markdown": "# BASI: the outsiders testing the inside\n\nBASI adds a different kind of power to this map: the practical ability to make AI systems do things their developers did not intend. That knowledge can travel through a public community, a specialist collective, a research engagement or a commercial tool. Following those routes gives a clearer picture than assigning the entire neighborhood to a single ideological camp.\n\n[Pliny’s project hub](https://pliny.gg/) connects public tools, BT6 and the BASI community. A [Latent Space interview](https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator) presents Pliny and John V’s case for open research. [John V’s dated roster](https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9) identifies operators with other professional roles. These are distinct circles of activity, not interchangeable names for a proven corporate hierarchy.\n\nThe institutional links are tangible. [OpenAI credits Lysios for external testing](https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/). [TrojAI lists John V with Lysios](https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/). [a16z names Pliny as a grant recipient](https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/). Grants, professional roles and testing credits are the working connections here.\n\nWhat does the system achieve? Public experimentation produces methods and skilled practitioners. Organized research gives that work a setting. Institutional engagements can give researchers resources and access, while developers gain testing capacity and a public account of external scrutiny. This is our interpretation of the documented relationships; the actual agreements would tell us how publication rights and competing interests are negotiated.\n\nOne technical claim deserves care. In [Basilisk Venom](https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom), Pliny and Marco Figueroa interpret elicited model behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion. It is an attributed research claim, not a recovered training log or proof of a network intrusion.\n\n## What to follow next\n\nThe most revealing missing records are grant terms, research agreements and public explanations of disclosure rights. For the collective itself, dated membership statements and named project credits would clarify who performed which work. Those records would show how much autonomy survives when independent researchers enter institutional relationships.\n",
        "html": "<h1>BASI: the outsiders testing the inside</h1>\n<p>BASI adds a different kind of power to this map: the practical ability to make AI systems do things their developers did not intend. That knowledge can travel through a public community, a specialist collective, a research engagement or a commercial tool. Following those routes gives a clearer picture than assigning the entire neighborhood to a single ideological camp.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://pliny.gg/\">Pliny’s project hub</a> connects public tools, BT6 and the BASI community. A <a href=\"https://www.latent.space/p/jailbreaking-agi-pliny-the-liberator\">Latent Space interview</a> presents Pliny and John V’s case for open research. <a href=\"https://medium.com/@johnvspecialist/bt6-44c907150ea9\">John V’s dated roster</a> identifies operators with other professional roles. These are distinct circles of activity, not interchangeable names for a proven corporate hierarchy.</p>\n<p>The institutional links are tangible. <a href=\"https://openai.com/index/operator-system-card/\">OpenAI credits Lysios for external testing</a>. <a href=\"https://troj.ai/blog/ai-red-teaming-insights-from-the-front-lines-of-genai-security/\">TrojAI lists John V with Lysios</a>. <a href=\"https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/\">a16z names Pliny as a grant recipient</a>. Grants, professional roles and testing credits are the working connections here.</p>\n<p>What does the system achieve? Public experimentation produces methods and skilled practitioners. Organized research gives that work a setting. Institutional engagements can give researchers resources and access, while developers gain testing capacity and a public account of external scrutiny. This is our interpretation of the documented relationships; the actual agreements would tell us how publication rights and competing interests are negotiated.</p>\n<p>One technical claim deserves care. In <a href=\"https://0din.ai/blog/poison-in-the-pipeline-liberating-models-with-basilisk-venom\">Basilisk Venom</a>, Pliny and Marco Figueroa interpret elicited model behavior as evidence of training-data ingestion. It is an attributed research claim, not a recovered training log or proof of a network intrusion.</p>\n<h2>What to follow next</h2>\n<p>The most revealing missing records are grant terms, research agreements and public explanations of disclosure rights. For the collective itself, dated membership statements and named project credits would clarify who performed which work. Those records would show how much autonomy survives when independent researchers enter institutional relationships.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "pliny-andreessen-grant",
        "title": "Pliny, Andreessen and the grant",
        "description": "A confirmed a16z award and a reported personal grant: one payment or two?",
        "markdown": "# Pliny, Andreessen and the grant\n\n[a16z announced Pliny](https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/) in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort on June26,2025. The announcement explicitly describes grants rather than investments. It supplies no individual award amount.\n\n[TIME’s August2025 profile](https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/) reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. We have not established whether this describes the same a16z award or a separate personal instrument. The two graph connections are two sourced descriptions, not two sums of money.\n\nThe significance is support for research outside the large labs from a major venture-capital network. The open question is what that support makes possible and what obligations, if any, accompany it. The useful next document is the award letter or a donor/recipient explanation of its terms—not a guessed dollar figure.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Pliny, Andreessen and the grant</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://a16z.com/advancing-open-source-ai-through-benchmarks-and-bold-experimentation/\">a16z announced Pliny</a> in its third Open Source AI Grant cohort on June26,2025. The announcement explicitly describes grants rather than investments. It supplies no individual award amount.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://time.com/collections/time100-ai-2025/7305870/pliny-the-liberator/\">TIME’s August2025 profile</a> reports an unrestricted grant from Marc Andreessen. We have not established whether this describes the same a16z award or a separate personal instrument. The two graph connections are two sourced descriptions, not two sums of money.</p>\n<p>The significance is support for research outside the large labs from a major venture-capital network. The open question is what that support makes possible and what obligations, if any, accompany it. The useful next document is the award letter or a donor/recipient explanation of its terms—not a guessed dollar figure.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-public-ownership-and-board-control",
        "title": "AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?",
        "description": "A September appearance leads back to distinct June proposals for public equity, corporate governance and independent testing.",
        "markdown": "# AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?\n\nEl-Sayed restated his public-governance proposal on CBS on September13. [Interview](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/). The underlying documents below are June proposals, newly added to this investigation on September14.\n\nThe debate includes an explicit bid to change who owns and governs AI businesses. [El-Sayed’s platform](https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/) would require public benefit charters and majority public board representation. It also proposes independent safety assessment, restrictions on certain applications and controls over access to computing resources.\n\nThe [campaign announcement](https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/) connects that agenda to Sanders’s ownership plan. Its stated justification combines public contribution to AI, worker protection and resistance to concentrated private power. That is the campaign’s case for the proposed redistribution of decision rights.\n\n[Sanders’s office summary](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf) describes a public fund with a commission managing its holdings. The office’s headline valuation is an estimate of what the proposal might produce, not money already collected. The linked text is a legislative draft; this update establishes no passage or enacted transfer.\n\n## Two powers that should not be confused\n\nOwnership provides economic claims and the rights attached to shares. A guaranteed majority of board seats is a separate corporate-governance rule. Neither should be casually translated into unlimited control. Board composition, voting classes, conflicts rules and the applicable mandate determine what a representative can actually decide.\n\nThe institutional contrast with embedded laboratory evaluators is useful. An evaluator observes, tests and reports under an access arrangement. A shareholder representative participates in company governance. A regulator may compel compliance. Calling all three oversight conceals the practical question this investigation asks: which decisions move, to whom, and with what means of challenge?\n\n## What would change the picture next\n\nFollow formal legislative records, amendments and the selection rules for any proposed public representatives. For the campaign platform, an implementing text would show how election and appointment alternatives are meant to work. For the existing evaluator proposals, contracts remain the missing counterpart.\n\nThe campaign also explicitly prohibits mass political surveillance, AI targeting of dissent and warrantless surveillance. Those limits belong in the account alongside its proposed controls.\n",
        "html": "<h1>AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats?</h1>\n<p>El-Sayed restated his public-governance proposal on CBS on September13. <a href=\"https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrat-senate-face-the-nation-transcript-09-13-2026/\">Interview</a>. The underlying documents below are June proposals, newly added to this investigation on September14.</p>\n<p>The debate includes an explicit bid to change who owns and governs AI businesses. <a href=\"https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/first-do-no-harm-ai-under-democracy/\">El-Sayed’s platform</a> would require public benefit charters and majority public board representation. It also proposes independent safety assessment, restrictions on certain applications and controls over access to computing resources.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://abdulforsenate.com/2026/06/dr-abdul-el-sayed-announces-ai-policy-platform-ai-under-democracy/\">campaign announcement</a> connects that agenda to Sanders’s ownership plan. Its stated justification combines public contribution to AI, worker protection and resistance to concentrated private power. That is the campaign’s case for the proposed redistribution of decision rights.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AmericanAISovereignWealthFundActSummary.pdf\">Sanders’s office summary</a> describes a public fund with a commission managing its holdings. The office’s headline valuation is an estimate of what the proposal might produce, not money already collected. The linked text is a legislative draft; this update establishes no passage or enacted transfer.</p>\n<h2>Two powers that should not be confused</h2>\n<p>Ownership provides economic claims and the rights attached to shares. A guaranteed majority of board seats is a separate corporate-governance rule. Neither should be casually translated into unlimited control. Board composition, voting classes, conflicts rules and the applicable mandate determine what a representative can actually decide.</p>\n<p>The institutional contrast with embedded laboratory evaluators is useful. An evaluator observes, tests and reports under an access arrangement. A shareholder representative participates in company governance. A regulator may compel compliance. Calling all three oversight conceals the practical question this investigation asks: which decisions move, to whom, and with what means of challenge?</p>\n<h2>What would change the picture next</h2>\n<p>Follow formal legislative records, amendments and the selection rules for any proposed public representatives. For the campaign platform, an implementing text would show how election and appointment alternatives are meant to work. For the existing evaluator proposals, contracts remain the missing counterpart.</p><p>The campaign also explicitly prohibits mass political surveillance, AI targeting of dissent and warrantless surveillance. Those limits belong in the account alongside its proposed controls.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-evaluators-money-and-access",
        "title": "Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network",
        "description": "Canary, public contracts and professional bridges make the evaluation layer visible.",
        "markdown": "# Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network\n\nThe finding is an institutional junction: evaluation research sits between philanthropic priorities, laboratory access and public authority. The relationships are visible enough to ask concrete questions about how that junction works.\n\n## A funded collaboration with RAND\n\n[METR’s October 2024 announcement](https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/) describes about $38m catalyzed through Audacious for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Gates appears in the wider collective; a Gates-specific Canary contribution is not identified. [The project profile](https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand) describes evaluation capacity as the intended outcome.\n\n## Resources behind independence\n\n[METR’s August update](https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/) announces about $71m in commitments over six months. Its acknowledgments cover multiple years. [Its About page](https://metr.org/about) discloses an EU AI Office assistance contract and lab-supplied resources. The missing terms matter: publication rights, withdrawal of access and dispute procedures determine how independence operates.\n\nThe [spin-off account](https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/) describes separation from ARC, and its current text says Paul Christiano declined planned board and advisory involvement. Historical incubation is the relationship established here.\n\n## From methods to rules\n\nThe [2023 scaling-policy framework](https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/) explicitly presents voluntary evaluations as groundwork for standards and regulation. This is a documented route by which technical criteria could become conditions on further development. Our inference is that the people designing those criteria deserve scrutiny alongside those formally empowered to enforce them.\n\nRAND’s [open-weight evaluation paper](https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html) makes the asymmetry debate concrete: it proposes testing against post-release modifications while recognizing proportionality. A useful public argument should examine the tests, their costs and their consequences.\n\n## The next records with leverage\n\nThe EU contract and deliverables; lab-access agreements and publication clauses; Canary donor allocations; and appointment and appeal rules for any adopted regime. Those documents could establish who has discretion, who pays and who can contest the result.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network</h1>\n<p>The finding is an institutional junction: evaluation research sits between philanthropic priorities, laboratory access and public authority. The relationships are visible enough to ask concrete questions about how that junction works.</p>\n<h2>A funded collaboration with RAND</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2024-10-09-new-support-through-the-audacious-project/\">METR’s October 2024 announcement</a> describes about $38m catalyzed through Audacious for Canary, including about $17m for METR. Gates appears in the wider collective; a Gates-specific Canary contribution is not identified. <a href=\"https://audaciousproject.org/grantees/project-canary-a-collaboration-between-metr-and-rand\">The project profile</a> describes evaluation capacity as the intended outcome.</p>\n<h2>Resources behind independence</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/\">METR’s August update</a> announces about $71m in commitments over six months. Its acknowledgments cover multiple years. <a href=\"https://metr.org/about\">Its About page</a> discloses an EU AI Office assistance contract and lab-supplied resources. The missing terms matter: publication rights, withdrawal of access and dispute procedures determine how independence operates.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2023-12-04-metr-announcement/\">spin-off account</a> describes separation from ARC, and its current text says Paul Christiano declined planned board and advisory involvement. Historical incubation is the relationship established here.</p>\n<h2>From methods to rules</h2>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2023-09-26-rsp/\">2023 scaling-policy framework</a> explicitly presents voluntary evaluations as groundwork for standards and regulation. This is a documented route by which technical criteria could become conditions on further development. Our inference is that the people designing those criteria deserve scrutiny alongside those formally empowered to enforce them.</p>\n<p>RAND’s <a href=\"https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA4886-1.html\">open-weight evaluation paper</a> makes the asymmetry debate concrete: it proposes testing against post-release modifications while recognizing proportionality. A useful public argument should examine the tests, their costs and their consequences.</p>\n<h2>The next records with leverage</h2>\n<p>The EU contract and deliverables; lab-access agreements and publication clauses; Canary donor allocations; and appointment and appeal rules for any adopted regime. Those documents could establish who has discretion, who pays and who can contest the result.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-philanthropy-and-public-infrastructure",
        "title": "Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure",
        "description": "A joint commitment links models, public-service data and implementation partners.",
        "markdown": "# Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure\n\nThe [Gates announcement](https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership) describes a joint $200m commitment over four years, mixing grants, API credits and support. It promises shared public goods across public-service fields.\n\n[Anthropic’s account](https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership) adds operational connections: interfaces, evaluation tools, health-ministry work and an IDM integration. These are worth following beyond the announcement.\n\nOur structural reading: funding adoption can influence the tools and standards institutions use for years. Open resources could reduce dependence; restrictive data or access terms could increase it. Agreements will distinguish those outcomes.\n\nThe map records the programme and named collaborators. It does not convert the aggregate headline into a transfer between the two partners. The next evidence is the award schedule, each partner’s contribution, licensing terms and switching provisions.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure</h1>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2026/05/ai-anthropic-partnership\">Gates announcement</a> describes a joint $200m commitment over four years, mixing grants, API credits and support. It promises shared public goods across public-service fields.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.anthropic.com/news/gates-foundation-partnership\">Anthropic’s account</a> adds operational connections: interfaces, evaluation tools, health-ministry work and an IDM integration. These are worth following beyond the announcement.</p>\n<p>Our structural reading: funding adoption can influence the tools and standards institutions use for years. Open resources could reduce dependence; restrictive data or access terms could increase it. Agreements will distinguish those outcomes.</p>\n<p>The map records the programme and named collaborators. It does not convert the aggregate headline into a transfer between the two partners. The next evidence is the award schedule, each partner’s contribution, licensing terms and switching provisions.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "sanders-asi-proposal-source-check",
        "title": "Sanders’s ASI proposal: what the released document says",
        "description": "Testing a viral account against the sponsors’ published summary.",
        "markdown": "# Sanders’s ASI proposal: what the released document says\n\n[Sayer Ji’s article](https://sayerji.substack.com/p/bernies-anti-oligarch-bill-was-written) prompted this pass. It raises a worthwhile question about who funds and staffs the evaluation ecosystem. Its stronger legal conclusions need a different evidentiary footing.\n\nThe [official summary](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf) has two alternative capability definitions. Broad human-level-or-better cognition can qualify without additionally proving an ability to overthrow human control. Ease of modification matters in connection with the specified capabilities.\n\nThe wording deserves scrutiny. It contains no named Anthropic or closed-model exemption. The proposed agency enforces; the board advises. Development and deployment are the stated targets; a blanket criminal offence for merely downloading an open model is not established.\n\nThe [sponsor announcement](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/) calls the legislation forthcoming. Targeted searches did not recover introduced statutory text or a bill number; direct Congress access was restricted. Appointment rules, review procedures and exact offences remain consequential gaps.\n\nThe important question survives the correction: if evaluation becomes a condition of lawful development, whose tests count, who can afford them and how can an adverse result be challenged? The evaluator network and the separate ownership proposals show different routes through which decision rights might shift.\n\n[ControlAI’s own account](https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent) says it consulted on the US framework and prefers a narrower approach than the announced advanced-AI pause. That establishes a policy contribution and a disagreement over scope. It does not identify the authors of every clause or a donor’s drafting instructions.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Sanders’s ASI proposal: what the released document says</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://sayerji.substack.com/p/bernies-anti-oligarch-bill-was-written\">Sayer Ji’s article</a> prompted this pass. It raises a worthwhile question about who funds and staffs the evaluation ecosystem. Its stronger legal conclusions need a different evidentiary footing.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act-Release-Summary.pdf\">official summary</a> has two alternative capability definitions. Broad human-level-or-better cognition can qualify without additionally proving an ability to overthrow human control. Ease of modification matters in connection with the specified capabilities.</p>\n<p>The wording deserves scrutiny. It contains no named Anthropic or closed-model exemption. The proposed agency enforces; the board advises. Development and deployment are the stated targets; a blanket criminal offence for merely downloading an open model is not established.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/\">sponsor announcement</a> calls the legislation forthcoming. Targeted searches did not recover introduced statutory text or a bill number; direct Congress access was restricted. Appointment rules, review procedures and exact offences remain consequential gaps.</p>\n<p>The important question survives the correction: if evaluation becomes a condition of lawful development, whose tests count, who can afford them and how can an adverse result be challenged? The evaluator network and the separate ownership proposals show different routes through which decision rights might shift.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/first-bill-introduced-to-ban-superintelligent\">ControlAI’s own account</a> says it consulted on the US framework and prefers a narrower approach than the announced advanced-AI pause. That establishes a policy contribution and a disagreement over scope. It does not identify the authors of every clause or a donor’s drafting instructions.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "pro-human-coalition-and-september-assembly",
        "title": "The coalition was here before the surge",
        "description": "A March declaration and September assembly reveal a concrete organizing sequence.",
        "markdown": "# The coalition was here before the surge\n\nThe September 15 Washington assembly builds on an earlier advocacy platform. [FLI's March4 announcement](https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/) already named Steve Bannon as an endorser. That organizing history predates Coxon's September resignation.\n\n## A changed participation report\n\nAxios updated its report on September 14 to say Coxon and the organizers confirmed he would not attend. The organizer homepage still lists him; the linked programme does not. We have corrected the earlier reported-participation edge and retained its original observation. This is a change in the reported plan, with an unresolved website mismatch, not evidence of his motive. [Updated Axios account](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai); [organizer homepage](https://prohumanassembly.org/); [programme](https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/).\n\n## What the programme establishes\n\nThe organizer programme identifies FLI as presenter, assigns opening and closing sessions to its officers, and schedules Sanders and Bannon in adjacent afternoon slots. A later Frank McCourt session is labelled for a coalition announcement. Labor, faith, parents and creators also appear. The programme documents how the gathering is arranged; it does not tell us which commitments will be made or who paid for an appearance. [Read the agenda](https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/).\n\n## What remains to be demonstrated\n\nShared principles and a scheduled venue provide infrastructure for coalition-building. They do not prove agreement on a particular law, joint command, speaker compensation or the origin of earlier media appearances. Attendance, recordings, sponsor disclosures and any joint legislative text are the next useful records.\n",
        "html": "<h1>The coalition was here before the surge</h1>\n<p>The September 15 Washington assembly builds on an earlier advocacy platform. <a href=\"https://futureoflife.org/press-release/statement-of-shared-principles-on-ai/\">FLI's March4 announcement</a> already named Steve Bannon as an endorser. That organizing history predates Coxon's September resignation.</p>\n<h2>A changed participation report</h2>\n<p>Axios updated its report on September 14 to say Coxon and the organizers confirmed he would not attend. The organizer homepage still lists him; the linked programme does not. We have corrected the earlier reported-participation edge and retained its original observation. This is a change in the reported plan, with an unresolved website mismatch, not evidence of his motive. <a href=\"https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/coxon-bernie-bannon-unite-human-ai\">Updated Axios account</a>; <a href=\"https://prohumanassembly.org/\">organizer homepage</a>; <a href=\"https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/\">programme</a>.</p>\n<h2>What the programme establishes</h2>\n<p>The organizer programme identifies FLI as presenter, assigns opening and closing sessions to its officers, and schedules Sanders and Bannon in adjacent afternoon slots. A later Frank McCourt session is labelled for a coalition announcement. Labor, faith, parents and creators also appear. The programme documents how the gathering is arranged; it does not tell us which commitments will be made or who paid for an appearance. <a href=\"https://prohumanassembly.org/agenda/\">Read the agenda</a>.</p>\n<h2>What remains to be demonstrated</h2>\n<p>Shared principles and a scheduled venue provide infrastructure for coalition-building. They do not prove agreement on a particular law, joint command, speaker compensation or the origin of earlier media appearances. Attendance, recordings, sponsor disclosures and any joint legislative text are the next useful records.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-pacing-politics-september-14",
        "title": "AI pacing meets competing political demands",
        "description": "China’s response and Johnson’s position show why lab agreement does not settle public policy.",
        "markdown": "# AI pacing meets competing political demands\n\nAgreement among laboratory leaders leaves the international and political terms unsettled. Two responses make that tension visible.\n\n## China challenges containment\n\n[AP’s September 14 report](https://apnews.com/article/3da458d2c078da3e60900728d59f1ae8) attributes to Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun a call for cooperation and opposition to confrontation in AI governance. The [official September 14 transcript](https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202609/t20260914_12021997.html) is now available and supports the attributed position. Guo advocates inclusive AI development and criticizes confrontation; the answer contains no commitment to slow Chinese frontier development. The reported response challenges the China-containment component of Amodei’s proposal; it supplies no Chinese commitment to slow development.\n\n## Congress is another decision point\n\n[CNN’s September 13 interview coverage](https://keyt.com/politics/cnn-us-politics/2026/09/13/political-debate-over-ai-intensifies-amid-warnings-about-catastrophic-risk/) reports Mike Johnson resisting an emergency regulatory session and seeking discussion with industry. He framed the risk of losing to China as a reason against rushing legislation.\n\n## What changes in the larger picture\n\nA laboratory commitment, a campaigning coalition and a legislative decision are different steps. The emerging contest concerns which institutions can turn their preferred safety criteria into enforceable conditions, and which actors can resist or rewrite those conditions. The useful next evidence is an enacted instrument, an executed evaluator agreement or an explicit diplomatic commitment—not another expression of general concern.\n\nThe same ministry briefing describes announced BRICS open-source AI and digital-platform initiatives. Their governance, funding and implementation remain follow-up questions; a diplomatic announcement does not establish that the services are operating.\n",
        "html": "<h1>AI pacing meets competing political demands</h1>\n<p>Agreement among laboratory leaders leaves the international and political terms unsettled. Two responses make that tension visible.</p>\n<h2>China challenges containment</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://apnews.com/article/3da458d2c078da3e60900728d59f1ae8\">AP’s September 14 report</a> attributes to Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun a call for cooperation and opposition to confrontation in AI governance. The <a href=\"https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202609/t20260914_12021997.html\">official September 14 transcript</a> is now available and supports the attributed position. Guo advocates inclusive AI development and criticizes confrontation; the answer contains no commitment to slow Chinese frontier development. The reported response challenges the China-containment component of Amodei’s proposal; it supplies no Chinese commitment to slow development.</p>\n<h2>Congress is another decision point</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://keyt.com/politics/cnn-us-politics/2026/09/13/political-debate-over-ai-intensifies-amid-warnings-about-catastrophic-risk/\">CNN’s September 13 interview coverage</a> reports Mike Johnson resisting an emergency regulatory session and seeking discussion with industry. He framed the risk of losing to China as a reason against rushing legislation.</p>\n<h2>What changes in the larger picture</h2>\n<p>A laboratory commitment, a campaigning coalition and a legislative decision are different steps. The emerging contest concerns which institutions can turn their preferred safety criteria into enforceable conditions, and which actors can resist or rewrite those conditions. The useful next evidence is an enacted instrument, an executed evaluator agreement or an explicit diplomatic commitment—not another expression of general concern.</p>\n<p>The same ministry briefing describes announced BRICS open-source AI and digital-platform initiatives. Their governance, funding and implementation remain follow-up questions; a diplomatic announcement does not establish that the services are operating.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "google-canada-age-assurance",
        "title": "Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts",
        "description": "An announced geographic expansion connects inferred age to platform access.",
        "markdown": "# Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts\n\n[Google Canada announced on September 14](https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/) that a gradual rollout will begin in coming days. Search and YouTube activity inform age estimates, which trigger protections including restrictions on adult-only Play apps.\n\nThe [US announcement of July 2025](https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/) establishes the earlier method. The new development is its Canadian expansion.\n\nThe research question is practical: how many adults are misclassified, how well can they correct the decision, and what happens while a challenge is unresolved? The Canadian announcement describes correction methods, including ID and selfie options, but supplies no measured Canadian error or appeal-success rates.\n\nThis is a company rollout announcement. It does not establish that every Canadian must submit identification, or that the rollout has finished.",
        "html": "<h1>Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://blog.google/intl/en-ca/company-news/technology/ensuring-safer-online-experiences-for-canadian-kids-and-teens/\">Google Canada announced on September 14</a> that a gradual rollout will begin in coming days. Search and YouTube activity inform age estimates, which trigger protections including restrictions on adult-only Play apps.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-security/age-assurance-measures-safer-online-kids-teens-us/\">US announcement of July 2025</a> establishes the earlier method. The new development is its Canadian expansion.</p>\n<p>The research question is practical: how many adults are misclassified, how well can they correct the decision, and what happens while a challenge is unresolved? The Canadian announcement describes correction methods, including ID and selfie options, but supplies no measured Canadian error or appeal-success rates.</p>\n<p>This is a company rollout announcement. It does not establish that every Canadian must submit identification, or that the rollout has finished.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w43-au-enforcement-in-force",
        "title": "Australia can now compel more of the evidence behind age checks",
        "description": "The enacted amendment closes a legal-status gap and clarifies the regulator's power and safeguards.",
        "markdown": "# Australia can now compel more of the evidence behind age checks\n\nAustralia's minimum-age enforcement amendment is already in force. The [enacted text](https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf) records assent on September 11 and commencement on September 12. This is a legal-status gap closed during our September 14 review, not a law passed at noon today.\n\nThe [ministerial explanation](https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law) identifies age-assurance and app-store providers among the third parties from which eSafety may seek evidence. Its stated maximum company penalty is A$109.2 million; infringement notices are a separate route. The practical mechanism is access to the people and records behind a platform's compliance claims.\n\nThe Act separates written information demands in section 63G from examination notices in Division 4A. Examinations are private, with an adviser allowed, a record available on request, witness protections, a journalist-source exception and specified protections concerning self-incriminating evidence. These limits belong beside the power, not in a distant footnote.\n\nNo use of these new powers against a particular company was established in this review. The most useful next records are actual notices, court filings or eSafety's next compliance report. This enacted amendment must remain distinct from the separate digital-duty-of-care proposal.",
        "html": "<h1>Australia can now compel more of the evidence behind age checks</h1>\n<p>Australia's minimum-age enforcement amendment is already in force. The <a href=\"https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2026A00083/asmade/2026-09-11/text/original/pdf\">enacted text</a> records assent on September 11 and commencement on September 12. This is a legal-status gap closed during our September 14 review, not a law passed at noon today.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/wells/media-release/australia-doubles-down-social-media-law\">ministerial explanation</a> identifies age-assurance and app-store providers among the third parties from which eSafety may seek evidence. Its stated maximum company penalty is A$109.2 million; infringement notices are a separate route. The practical mechanism is access to the people and records behind a platform's compliance claims.</p>\n<p>The Act separates written information demands in section 63G from examination notices in Division 4A. Examinations are private, with an adviser allowed, a record available on request, witness protections, a journalist-source exception and specified protections concerning self-incriminating evidence. These limits belong beside the power, not in a distant footnote.</p>\n<p>No use of these new powers against a particular company was established in this review. The most useful next records are actual notices, court filings or eSafety's next compliance report. This enacted amendment must remain distinct from the separate digital-duty-of-care proposal.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w43-fin-clarity-remedies",
        "title": "CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route",
        "description": "The proposed financial controls matter at the level of triggers, defendants and exceptions.",
        "markdown": "# CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route\n\nSeptember 20 update: cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633 failed on September 15; reconsideration was entered. The provisions below remain proposed. [Read the procedural update](/research/w51-clarity-procedural-vote).\n\n[The senators' September 14 release](https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/) presents a revised CLARITY substitute for a possible Senate motion-to-proceed outcome on September 15. The release was already circulating late Sunday; this is newly examined evidence in this pass, not a claimed event after the 12:06UTC scan cutoff. A procedural vote would not itself enact the draft.\n\n[The draft](https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf), section 10404(c)(3)(C), defines the relevant community banks as institutions or holding companies below $10 billion in assets. A Treasury determination within 18 months of enactment must find substantial detrimental transfers of interest-bearing deposits to payment stablecoins specifically because of the regulated activities. Rulemaking would then require notice/comment and consultation with the OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve. The 18 months limits when that determination may be made; it should not be paraphrased as a demonstrated expiration of every resulting regulation.\n\nThe ethics provision's state route is also narrower than a generic power to prosecute officials. Proposed 5 USC 13153(d), pp 629–632, sends certain claims against the US Attorney General through district-court findings and en-banc appellate judgment. Intermediary listing violations have a separate direct route. Certain supervising ethics-office opinions or notices can block the former route.\n\nThe [sponsors' change summary](https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf) supplies their account of the bargain, rather than evidence that it has passed or that every claimed concession is equivalent to the opposition's proposal. The structure offers outside enforcement while retaining procedural and administrative gates. Next inspect the actual substitute offered, votes and any revised text; realized bank effects and judicial practice remain future evidence.",
        "html": "<h1>CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route</h1>\n<p><strong>September 20 update.</strong> cloture on proceeding to H.R. 3633 failed on September 15; reconsideration was entered. The provisions below remain proposed. <a href=\"/research/w51-clarity-procedural-vote\">Read the update →</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/lummis-boozman-scott-release-final-clarity-act-text/\">The senators' September 14 release</a> presents a revised CLARITY substitute for a possible Senate motion-to-proceed outcome on September 15. The release was already circulating late Sunday; this is newly examined evidence in this pass, not a claimed event after the 12:06UTC scan cutoff. A procedural vote would not itself enact the draft.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/EHF26724.pdf\">The draft</a>, section 10404(c)(3)(C), defines the relevant community banks as institutions or holding companies below $10 billion in assets. A Treasury determination within 18 months of enactment must find substantial detrimental transfers of interest-bearing deposits to payment stablecoins specifically because of the regulated activities. Rulemaking would then require notice/comment and consultation with the OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve. The 18 months limits when that determination may be made; it should not be paraphrased as a demonstrated expiration of every resulting regulation.</p>\n<p>The ethics provision's state route is also narrower than a generic power to prosecute officials. Proposed 5 USC 13153(d), pp 629–632, sends certain claims against the US Attorney General through district-court findings and en-banc appellate judgment. Intermediary listing violations have a separate direct route. Certain supervising ethics-office opinions or notices can block the former route.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.lummis.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Whats-New-in-the-Final-Clarity-Act-Text1.pdf\">sponsors' change summary</a> supplies their account of the bargain, rather than evidence that it has passed or that every claimed concession is equivalent to the opposition's proposal. The structure offers outside enforcement while retaining procedural and administrative gates. Next inspect the actual substitute offered, votes and any revised text; realized bank effects and judicial practice remain future evidence.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w43-fin-paypal-dispute",
        "title": "PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal",
        "description": "A previously announced contractual change reaches its stated effective date.",
        "markdown": "# PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal\n\n[PayPal's notice](https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full), issued June 29, gives September 14,2026 as the effective date for revised US dispute terms. This is a commencement-date observation, not a newly announced ban. The linked [US agreement](https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf) carries today's date; the effective hour and zone are unspecified.\n\nJAMS replaces AAA. For 25 or more coordinated similar disputes, the agreement creates staged arbitration: initially 50 cases if at least 50 exist, with remaining cases held back and fees deferred, followed by mediation and another stage. Later unresolved cases can move to court or further staged arbitration. Limitation periods are tolled. The terms also claim to supersede previous arbitration agreements for earlier disputes; initial-account arbitration opt-out and small-claims provisions remain.\n\nA payment provider's practical power includes how its users can challenge it. These procedural gates could affect the timing and collective pressure of claims, while PayPal frames them as a way to conserve resources. That is an interpretation of contract design, not measured delay, a court's enforceability ruling or proof of a content-restriction instruction. The next revealing records would be actual administration and court decisions.",
        "html": "<h1>PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/paypal/upcoming-policies-full\">PayPal's notice</a>, issued June 29, gives September 14,2026 as the effective date for revised US dispute terms. This is a commencement-date observation, not a newly announced ban. The linked <a href=\"https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/OA/useragreement-full/en-US-091426.pdf\">US agreement</a> carries today's date; the effective hour and zone are unspecified.</p>\n<p>JAMS replaces AAA. For 25 or more coordinated similar disputes, the agreement creates staged arbitration: initially 50 cases if at least 50 exist, with remaining cases held back and fees deferred, followed by mediation and another stage. Later unresolved cases can move to court or further staged arbitration. Limitation periods are tolled. The terms also claim to supersede previous arbitration agreements for earlier disputes; initial-account arbitration opt-out and small-claims provisions remain.</p>\n<p>A payment provider's practical power includes how its users can challenge it. These procedural gates could affect the timing and collective pressure of claims, while PayPal frames them as a way to conserve resources. That is an interpretation of contract design, not measured delay, a court's enforceability ruling or proof of a content-restriction instruction. The next revealing records would be actual administration and court decisions.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w43-ai-uk-oversight",
        "title": "Who could stop a model release? A UK committee's proposal",
        "description": "A parliamentary recommendation identifies the proposed decision rights and the responsibility problem behind them.",
        "markdown": "# Who could stop a model release?\n\nThe [Joint Committee on Human Rights report](https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html), adopted September 9 and published September 14, proposes statutory oversight with testing, sanction and remedy powers. Launch blocking or withdrawal would turn on an unacceptable risk to human rights; AISI would advise and the oversight body would decide. It also recommends mandatory access to powerful models for the AI Security Institute. These are recommendations to government, not an enacted law.\n\nThe [committee's release](https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/) frames the problem across the supply chain: obligations should follow design and development as well as deployment. It calls for risk-based duties, fewer burdens on low-risk applications, and public consultation over prohibited uses.\n\nThe institutional design remains open. The committee allows an existing body to be expanded and AISI functions to be combined with oversight. The useful next record is the government's response, followed by actual bill language specifying who appoints the decision-makers, how decisions are challenged, and what powers survive into law.",
        "html": "<h1>Who could stop a model release?</h1>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5902/jtselect/jtrights/160/report.html\">Joint Committee on Human Rights report</a>, adopted September 9 and published September 14, proposes statutory oversight with testing, sanction and remedy powers. Launch blocking or withdrawal would turn on an unacceptable risk to human rights; AISI would advise and the oversight body would decide. It also recommends mandatory access to powerful models for the AI Security Institute. These are recommendations to government, not an enacted law.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/217859/wideranging-ai-bill-needed-to-address-severe-human-rights-risks-posed-by-ai/\">committee's release</a> frames the problem across the supply chain: obligations should follow design and development as well as deployment. It calls for risk-based duties, fewer burdens on low-risk applications, and public consultation over prohibited uses.</p>\n<p>The institutional design remains open. The committee allows an existing body to be expanded and AISI functions to be combined with oversight. The useful next record is the government's response, followed by actual bill language specifying who appoints the decision-makers, how decisions are challenged, and what powers survive into law.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44-net-blueprint-note",
        "title": "A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers",
        "description": "SV Angel’s appointment and initiative disclose an access mechanism, not an achieved policy result.",
        "markdown": "# A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers\n\n[SV Angel’s September 14 announcement](https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel) puts Jay Carney in charge of public policy and communications and launches Project Blueprint. The named task is to connect portfolio founders with policymakers. A venture firm’s network is being offered as a policy service, with a specific person assigned to run it.\n\n[The initiative page](https://svangel.com/blueprint) identifies AI risk, international competition, workforce and economic effects, and energy infrastructure as the areas of engagement. That makes the intended route inspectable: investment relationships supply a constituency; professional intermediaries seek access; officials retain public decision rights. Calling itself a bridge is the firm’s proposition, not evidence that officials have delegated those rights.\n\nThe pages do not disclose a project budget, binding membership rules or achieved legislative outcome. Carney’s professional biography is relevant to the advertised service but does not prove the effectiveness of each relationship. The dated news index establishes a September 14 announcement, not its hour. This is newly acquired material; it is not presented as a proven post-noon launch.\n\nActual meeting records, lobbying disclosures, submitted text and later official decisions could show what moved through this route. Until then, the supported relationship is organized access-seeking, not policy capture.\n",
        "html": "<h1>A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://svangel.com/news/jay-carney-joins-sv-angel\">SV Angel’s September 14 announcement</a> puts Jay Carney in charge of public policy and communications and launches Project Blueprint. The named task is to connect portfolio founders with policymakers. A venture firm’s network is being offered as a policy service, with a specific person assigned to run it.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://svangel.com/blueprint\">The initiative page</a> identifies AI risk, international competition, workforce and economic effects, and energy infrastructure as the areas of engagement. That makes the intended route inspectable: investment relationships supply a constituency; professional intermediaries seek access; officials retain public decision rights. Calling itself a bridge is the firm’s proposition, not evidence that officials have delegated those rights.</p>\n<p>The pages do not disclose a project budget, binding membership rules or achieved legislative outcome. Carney’s professional biography is relevant to the advertised service but does not prove the effectiveness of each relationship. The dated news index establishes a September 14 announcement, not its hour. This is newly acquired material; it is not presented as a proven post-noon launch.</p>\n<p>Actual meeting records, lobbying disclosures, submitted text and later official decisions could show what moved through this route. Until then, the supported relationship is organized access-seeking, not policy capture.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44-net-caucus-note",
        "title": "A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links",
        "description": "Separate reported congressional leadership from a private coalition’s named partners.",
        "markdown": "# A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links\n\n[Axios reports](https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress) that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. [Punchbowl’s public excerpt](https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/) describes the same organizing development.\n\nAIN is not newly created by this caucus story. Its [original launch page](https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/) names a16z, Anyscale, Exowatt, Sourcegraph and Y Combinator as partners. That older record gives the advocacy label a visible commercial constituency. It does not disclose partner payments or appointment powers, and it does not make the congressional caucus an AIN subsidiary.\n\nThe public map therefore connects the named caucus leaders to their reported venue and a16z to its documented AIN partnership. It deliberately does not draw an AIN-to-caucus control edge from concurrent activity. A shared issue and proximity on the calendar are not a governance instrument.\n\nThe next useful evidence is a caucus charter or roster, the actual visit record, submitted proposals and any subsequent legislative action. Those records could show whether access became agenda-setting, a specific amendment or a binding rule.\n",
        "html": "<h1>A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.axios.com/2026/09/14/house-republicans-democrats-ai-caucus-congress\">Axios reports</a> that Russell Fry and Suhas Subramanyam are leading a new House Innovators Caucus focused on small-business AI. It also reports planned lawmaker visits by a dozen companies affiliated with the American Innovators Network. The article was published at 19:32:02 UTC on September 14; the visits remain a reported plan, not observed meetings. <a href=\"https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/fry-subramanyam-ai-caucus/\">Punchbowl’s public excerpt</a> describes the same organizing development.</p>\n<p>AIN is not newly created by this caucus story. Its <a href=\"https://americaninnovatorsnetwork.com/american-innovators-network-launches-to-champion-little-tech/\">original launch page</a> names a16z, Anyscale, Exowatt, Sourcegraph and Y Combinator as partners. That older record gives the advocacy label a visible commercial constituency. It does not disclose partner payments or appointment powers, and it does not make the congressional caucus an AIN subsidiary.</p>\n<p>The public map therefore connects the named caucus leaders to their reported venue and a16z to its documented AIN partnership. It deliberately does not draw an AIN-to-caucus control edge from concurrent activity. A shared issue and proximity on the calendar are not a governance instrument.</p>\n<p>The next useful evidence is a caucus charter or roster, the actual visit record, submitted proposals and any subsequent legislative action. Those records could show whether access became agenda-setting, a specific amendment or a binding rule.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44-age-eu-kids-draft",
        "title": "The EU's proposed age gate comes into focus",
        "description": "Reuters describes an unpublished draft with age tiers, verification duties and provider-funded supervision.",
        "markdown": "# The EU's proposed age gate comes into focus\n\nUpdate, September 19: the Commission has now published its September 17 proposal. [Read the text and proposed implementation machinery](/research/w48-eu-kids-machinery).\n\nThe EU's anticipated Kids Act now has a more specific reported design. [Reuters, read through its WSAU republication](https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/), describes a Commission draft with age-tiered access covering social media, video-sharing, AI chatbots and online games. This is reporting about an unpublished draft, not an adopted proposal or a law in force.\n\nReuters reports independent accounts from age 15; parent-opened, restricted social/video accounts at 13–14; parent-controlled child-friendly services at 3–12; and no access below 3. It describes age checks at social/video account creation and before game downloads, plus company supervisory fees to fund enforcement.\n\nThe mechanism is differentiated access, verification and provider-funded oversight—not a simple universal exclusion of everyone under 15. But the underlying draft was not available for our inspection. Reuters says the Commission declined comment and details could change before presentation on September 17. Negotiation with member states and Parliament would still follow.\n\nWSAU published the report at 18:19:26 UTC on September 14. The decisive next record is the Commission's actual text, including definitions, exceptions, privacy protections and remedies.",
        "html": "<p>Update, September 19: the Commission has now published its September 17 proposal. <a href=\"/research/w48-eu-kids-machinery\">Read the text and proposed implementation machinery.</a></p><h1>The EU's proposed age gate comes into focus</h1>\n<p>The EU's anticipated Kids Act now has a more specific reported design. <a href=\"https://wsau.com/2026/09/14/eu-is-set-to-propose-ban-on-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-for-under-15s/\">Reuters, read through its WSAU republication</a>, describes a Commission draft with age-tiered access covering social media, video-sharing, AI chatbots and online games. This is reporting about an unpublished draft, not an adopted proposal or a law in force.</p>\n<p>Reuters reports independent accounts from age 15; parent-opened, restricted social/video accounts at 13–14; parent-controlled child-friendly services at 3–12; and no access below 3. It describes age checks at social/video account creation and before game downloads, plus company supervisory fees to fund enforcement.</p>\n<p>The mechanism is differentiated access, verification and provider-funded oversight—not a simple universal exclusion of everyone under 15. But the underlying draft was not available for our inspection. Reuters says the Commission declined comment and details could change before presentation on September 17. Negotiation with member states and Parliament would still follow.</p>\n<p>WSAU published the report at 18:19:26 UTC on September 14. The decisive next record is the Commission's actual text, including definitions, exceptions, privacy protections and remedies.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44-fin-note-pdc",
        "title": "UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement",
        "description": "A timed report adds a financing step to an older division of public and industry responsibilities.",
        "markdown": "# UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement\n\nSeptember 20 update: UK Finance announced the equity-capital process on September 15. That confirms a launch, not subscribed funds or final ownership terms. [Read the procedural update](/research/w51-pdc-capital-process).\n\n[Sky's September 14 report](https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850), published at 19:30 UK (18:30 UTC), says PDC plans a Tuesday equity solicitation of roughly £50m for setup through 2028. The financing terms come from unnamed sources; the spokesperson's statement confirms only the broad mission. This is a new report within the evening window, not evidence that the round has closed.\n\n[The BoE's July 2025 model](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure) gives RPIB design and oversight responsibilities, assigns industry-owned DeliveryCo procurement and funding, and leaves Pay.UK operating existing systems. The older [UK Finance invitation](https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders) explicitly described expressions of interest as nonbinding. Neither that invitation nor this report establishes capital paid, individual voting rights or awarded contracts.\n\nVisa and Mastercard's reported early involvement complicates a simple story of a new national system displacing foreign incumbents. The useful next records are subscription documents, incorporation and governance terms, design handover and procurement decisions. Until then, the mechanism is institution-building with unresolved financing and control, not a functioning replacement network.",
        "html": "<h1>UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement</h1>\n<p><strong>September 20 update.</strong> UK Finance announced the equity-capital process on September 15. That confirms a launch, not subscribed funds or final ownership terms. <a href=\"/research/w51-pdc-capital-process\">Read the update →</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://news.sky.com/story/uk-banks-kick-off-fundraising-in-bid-to-create-new-payments-giant-13585850\">Sky's September 14 report</a>, published at 19:30 UK (18:30 UTC), says PDC plans a Tuesday equity solicitation of roughly £50m for setup through 2028. The financing terms come from unnamed sources; the spokesperson's statement confirms only the broad mission. This is a new report within the evening window, not evidence that the round has closed.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2025/july/a-new-approach-to-retail-payments-infrastructure\">The BoE's July 2025 model</a> gives RPIB design and oversight responsibilities, assigns industry-owned DeliveryCo procurement and funding, and leaves Pay.UK operating existing systems. The older <a href=\"https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/establishing-deliveryco-call-initial-funders\">UK Finance invitation</a> explicitly described expressions of interest as nonbinding. Neither that invitation nor this report establishes capital paid, individual voting rights or awarded contracts.</p>\n<p>Visa and Mastercard's reported early involvement complicates a simple story of a new national system displacing foreign incumbents. The useful next records are subscription documents, incorporation and governance terms, design handover and procurement decisions. Until then, the mechanism is institution-building with unresolved financing and control, not a functioning replacement network.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44-fin-note-saca",
        "title": "A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory",
        "description": "TechNet gives three streaming companies a shared advocacy vehicle focused on access and sports distribution.",
        "markdown": "# A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory\n\n[TechNet's announcement](https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/) identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. [The coalition site](https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/) seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.\n\nThe date needs care. The release says it launched today, and an [official search-index entry](https://www.technet.org/rc/) labels the item September 14. Opening that same index returned older August content; a direct metadata request was forbidden. The calendar date is therefore index-supported and the intraday launch time remains unresolved. It is newly acquired evidence in this pass, not a confidently identified post-noon event.\n\nMembers' commercial interests supply a reason to inspect the vehicle, not proof that their policy claims are false or that their preferred rules will win. Lobby registrations, disclosed spending, filed comments and subsequent policy decisions would show how membership becomes practical influence.",
        "html": "<h1>A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.technet.org/media/video-streamers-launch-new-coalition/\">TechNet's announcement</a> identifies Amazon, Netflix and YouTube as SACA's founding members and Mike Ward as its leader. <a href=\"https://www.streamingaccessandchoicealliance.com/\">The coalition site</a> seeks technology-neutral access frameworks and support for streaming investment and sports-rights partnerships. Its footer identifies TechNet as payer. This establishes an organized advocacy channel, not an enacted access rule or demonstrated consumer benefit.</p>\n<p>The date needs care. The release says it launched today, and an <a href=\"https://www.technet.org/rc/\">official search-index entry</a> labels the item September 14. Opening that same index returned older August content; a direct metadata request was forbidden. The calendar date is therefore index-supported and the intraday launch time remains unresolved. It is newly acquired evidence in this pass, not a confidently identified post-noon event.</p>\n<p>Members' commercial interests supply a reason to inspect the vehicle, not proof that their policy claims are false or that their preferred rules will win. Lobby registrations, disclosed spending, filed comments and subsequent policy decisions would show how membership becomes practical influence.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44-ai-mai-draft-limits",
        "title": "Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result",
        "description": "A company-controlled consultation, with model scope and timing limits.",
        "markdown": "# Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result\n\nMicrosoft AI's [public draft](https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/) is a proposed behavioral rulebook for its own MAI models, not every model Microsoft hosts. It is not yet used for training; a revised version is intended to guide development in 2027 onward.\n\nThe [consultation announcement](https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/) reserves feedback decisions to the company's drafting team. The draft's hierarchy places company constraints above operator configurations and user preferences; specialized capabilities require separate Microsoft review.\n\nThis is an evening catch-up: both pages were published at 13:00Z. The code page records a 17:44:20Z modification, but no prior version establishes what changed. A public draft is not proof of deployed compliance or an independent regulator.",
        "html": "<h1>Microsoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result</h1>\n<p>Microsoft AI's <a href=\"https://microsoft.ai/code-of-conduct/\">public draft</a> is a proposed behavioral rulebook for its own MAI models, not every model Microsoft hosts. It is not yet used for training; a revised version is intended to guide development in 2027 onward.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://microsoft.ai/news/mai-code-of-conduct/\">consultation announcement</a> reserves feedback decisions to the company's drafting team. The draft's hierarchy places company constraints above operator configurations and user preferences; specialized capabilities require separate Microsoft review.</p>\n<p>This is an evening catch-up: both pages were published at 13:00Z. The code page records a 17:44:20Z modification, but no prior version establishes what changed. A public draft is not proof of deployed compliance or an independent regulator.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-interview-money-family-review-2026-09-16",
        "title": "Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review",
        "description": "The interview file: ControlAI sponsorship terms, the Amodei–Karnofsky link, METR's money and Anthropic's pilot publication veto.",
        "date": "2026-09-16",
        "markdown": "# Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review\n\nControlAI says it sponsored nine paid videos and helped make nine unpaid ones on AI extinction risk. It bought 60–90-second ad slots; topic was agreed in advance. Its account says creators retained main-video editorial control subject to two requirements: no endorsement of an AI company and citation of a named extinction or superintelligence statement. It also describes nonbinding script review, possible cancellation fees and sponsor disclosure. This documents paid advocacy, not a finding that every AI-risk voice was paid or that Sabine Hossenfelder signed a deal. [ControlAI's account](https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach).\n\n## The family connection\n\nDario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and Anthropic co-founders. Holden Karnofsky calls Daniela his wife; that makes him Dario's brother-in-law. Karnofsky was Open Philanthropy's CEO before stepping down in 2023 and later appears on an [Anthropic risk-report byline](https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/). These are public family and career facts, not proof of METR control or an undisclosed transfer. [TIME](https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/) · [Holden interview, p. 28](https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf) · [Open Philanthropy leadership account](https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/).\n\n## METR and Anthropic: the actual levers\n\nMETR reports about $71m in recent *commitments*, says it accepts no frontier-lab funding or staff-directed donations, and acknowledges substantial free model tokens. It lists Anthropic among five labs providing evaluation access and tokens. Its donor list does not establish an Anthropic cash grant. [Funding update](https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/) · [METR About](https://metr.org/about).\n\nThe sharper document is [METR's review of Anthropic's February 2026 risk report](https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf). METR criticized the report's evidence and survey while agreeing, based partly on outside evidence, with its very-low-risk conclusion for Opus 4.6 R&D automation. In its process appendix, METR says Anthropic reviewed publication under an NDA and had a *general veto* during this pilot. METR says no redactions happened, published its criticism, and wants future review limited to sensitive-information redactions. A contractual veto is an independence risk; this record does not show that it was exercised or that METR's conclusion was purchased.\n\n## EA and TESCREAL\n\nOpen Philanthropy's own account places Karnofsky in an effective-altruist institution. [Gebru and Torres's TESCREAL paper](https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636) groups transhumanism, Extropianism, singularitarianism, cosmism, Rationalism, effective altruism and longtermism into a critical historical argument. It is not a membership list. A 2024 [TIME profile](https://time.com/6980000/anthropic/) reported Anthropic saying neither Amodei sibling personally identified as EA, while acknowledging sympathy for some ideas. Documented relationships and policy proposals can be examined without converting an ideological label into proof of a coordinated bloc.\n\nThe next records worth asking for are sponsorship contracts and actual video disclosures; METR's evaluator agreement and future publication-rights terms; and grant records that would identify any claimed directed money flow. Family proximity is a lead, not the answer.",
        "html": "<h1>Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review</h1><p>ControlAI says it sponsored nine paid videos and helped make nine unpaid ones on AI extinction risk. It bought 60–90-second ad slots; topic was agreed in advance. Its account says creators retained main-video editorial control subject to two requirements: no endorsement of an AI company and citation of a named extinction or superintelligence statement. It also describes nonbinding script review, possible cancellation fees and sponsor disclosure. This documents paid advocacy, not a finding that every AI-risk voice was paid or that Sabine Hossenfelder signed a deal. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI's account</a>.</p><h2>The family connection</h2><p>Dario and Daniela Amodei are siblings and Anthropic co-founders. Holden Karnofsky calls Daniela his wife; that makes him Dario's brother-in-law. Karnofsky was Open Philanthropy's CEO before stepping down in 2023 and later appears on an <a href=\"https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/sabotage-risk-report/\">Anthropic risk-report byline</a>. These are public family and career facts, not proof of METR control or an undisclosed transfer. <a href=\"https://time.com/6309047/daniela-and-dario-amodei/\">TIME</a> · <a href=\"https://coefficientgiving.org/wp-content/uploads/nytimes.com-Transcript-Ezra-Klein-Interviews-Holden-Karnofsky.pdf\">Holden interview, p. 28</a> · <a href=\"https://coefficientgiving.org/research/our-progress-in-2023-and-plans-for-2024/\">Open Philanthropy leadership account</a>.</p><h2>METR and Anthropic: the actual levers</h2><p>METR reports about $71m in recent <em>commitments</em>, says it accepts no frontier-lab funding or staff-directed donations, and acknowledges substantial free model tokens. It lists Anthropic among five labs providing evaluation access and tokens. Its donor list does not establish an Anthropic cash grant. <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-14-funding-update/\">Funding update</a> · <a href=\"https://metr.org/about\">METR About</a>.</p><p>The sharper document is <a href=\"https://metr.org/assets/Original%20Review%20of%20%22Risks%20from%20automated%20R%26D%22%20section%20in%20the%20Anthropic%20Risk%20Report%20-%20February%202026.pdf\">METR's review of Anthropic's February 2026 risk report</a>. METR criticized the report's evidence and survey while agreeing, based partly on outside evidence, with its very-low-risk conclusion for Opus 4.6 R&amp;D automation. In its process appendix, METR says Anthropic reviewed publication under an NDA and had a <em>general veto</em> during this pilot. METR says no redactions happened, published its criticism, and wants future review limited to sensitive-information redactions. A contractual veto is an independence risk; this record does not show that it was exercised or that METR's conclusion was purchased.</p><h2>EA and TESCREAL</h2><p>Open Philanthropy's own account places Karnofsky in an effective-altruist institution. <a href=\"https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636\">Gebru and Torres's TESCREAL paper</a> groups transhumanism, Extropianism, singularitarianism, cosmism, Rationalism, effective altruism and longtermism into a critical historical argument. It is not a membership list. A 2024 <a href=\"https://time.com/6980000/anthropic/\">TIME profile</a> reported Anthropic saying neither Amodei sibling personally identified as EA, while acknowledging sympathy for some ideas. Documented relationships and policy proposals can be examined without converting an ideological label into proof of a coordinated bloc.</p><p>The next records worth asking for are sponsorship contracts and actual video disclosures; METR's evaluator agreement and future publication-rights terms; and grant records that would identify any claimed directed money flow. Family proximity is a lead, not the answer.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ea-funding-machinery-2026-09-19",
        "title": "EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument",
        "description": "The donor, media, recruitment and founder-funding circuit now visible in primary records.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument\n\nThe striking development is organizational. Coefficient Giving wants more AI-safety institutions to exist, is making larger grants to existing ones, and is recruiting people to create the next wave. The careers organization 80,000 Hours supplies one route from an interested audience to the people who can do that work.\n\nThat is our reading of the structure. The organizations describe the constituent steps themselves.\n\n## The capital is accelerating\n\n[Coefficient's September 9 update](https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/) reports $168 million of technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding commitments in 2024, $351 million in 2025, and a projection above $1 billion in 2026. It says August alone accounted for $352 million. Here, commitments means formally recommended funding; the figures are not cash receipts.\n\nThe same update announces Project Tailwind to recruit and fund new founders. Concrete examples show the scale: $160 million approved for Resolution, more than $70 million over two years recommended for Redwood Research, and a $68 million three-year renewal recommendation for Epoch AI. Research capacity, measurements and new institutions are being built with this money.\n\n## A disclosed recruitment circuit\n\n[80,000 Hours' strategy](https://80000hours.org/2026/05/our-strategy-at-80000-hours/) combines media and marketing with personal advice, a job board and headhunting. Its current focus is helping advanced AI go well. The organization is trying to turn attention into careers.\n\nOn September 17, it published an [interview with Coefficient grantmaker Max Nadeau](https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/) about founding AI-safety nonprofits. The episode discloses Coefficient as its largest donor, while specifying that Nadeau's team has not directly funded it. The recording was made on August 18.\n\nFollow the circuit: a grantmaker funds a careers-and-media organization; that organization brings the grantmaker's opportunities to prospective founders; successful founders can become a new set of funded institutions. The relationship is disclosed. Its importance lies in the capacity it builds.\n\n## An ecosystem preparing for more wealth\n\nThe new [Transformative AI Fund](https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai) supplies a smaller-scale entry point. Its typical $10,000-$150,000 grants can pay for a pilot, a first hire or a new organization. Its [launch rationale](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund) anticipates more philanthropic wealth and argues that suitable organizations need to be created before that money arrives.\n\nOur structural interpretation: this is a system for reproducing institutional capacity. It can influence which problems attract people, which research becomes available, and which organizations are ready when policymakers seek expertise. Measuring its policy effect requires the next step: tracing funded work into assessments, consultation submissions, official decisions and implementation.\n\nStart with the [money and institutions map](/maps/ea-money-and-institutions). The companion [fund split map](/maps/ea-funds-and-lightcone) shows who is building alternative ways to allocate that capital.",
        "html": "<h1>EA is financing the institutions, not just the argument</h1>\n<p>The striking development is organizational. Coefficient Giving wants more AI-safety institutions to exist, is making larger grants to existing ones, and is recruiting people to create the next wave. The careers organization 80,000 Hours supplies one route from an interested audience to the people who can do that work.</p>\n<p>That is our reading of the structure. The organizations describe the constituent steps themselves.</p>\n<h2>The capital is accelerating</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://coefficientgiving.org/research/were-urgently-scaling-our-work-on-ai-and-biosecurity/\">Coefficient&#x27;s September 9 update</a> reports $168 million of technical AI safety, security and fieldbuilding commitments in 2024, $351 million in 2025, and a projection above $1 billion in 2026. It says August alone accounted for $352 million. Here, commitments means formally recommended funding; the figures are not cash receipts.</p>\n<p>The same update announces Project Tailwind to recruit and fund new founders. Concrete examples show the scale: $160 million approved for Resolution, more than $70 million over two years recommended for Redwood Research, and a $68 million three-year renewal recommendation for Epoch AI. Research capacity, measurements and new institutions are being built with this money.</p>\n<h2>A disclosed recruitment circuit</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://80000hours.org/2026/05/our-strategy-at-80000-hours/\">80,000 Hours&#x27; strategy</a> combines media and marketing with personal advice, a job board and headhunting. Its current focus is helping advanced AI go well. The organization is trying to turn attention into careers.</p>\n<p>On September 17, it published an <a href=\"https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/max-nadeau-project-tailwind-technical-ai-grants/\">interview with Coefficient grantmaker Max Nadeau</a> about founding AI-safety nonprofits. The episode discloses Coefficient as its largest donor, while specifying that Nadeau&#x27;s team has not directly funded it. The recording was made on August 18.</p>\n<p>Follow the circuit: a grantmaker funds a careers-and-media organization; that organization brings the grantmaker&#x27;s opportunities to prospective founders; successful founders can become a new set of funded institutions. The relationship is disclosed. Its importance lies in the capacity it builds.</p>\n<h2>An ecosystem preparing for more wealth</h2>\n<p>The new <a href=\"https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai\">Transformative AI Fund</a> supplies a smaller-scale entry point. Its typical $10,000-$150,000 grants can pay for a pilot, a first hire or a new organization. Its <a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dYuNi5Rh68o9YKstg/ea-funds-is-launching-the-transformative-ai-fund\">launch rationale</a> anticipates more philanthropic wealth and argues that suitable organizations need to be created before that money arrives.</p>\n<p>Our structural interpretation: this is a system for reproducing institutional capacity. It can influence which problems attract people, which research becomes available, and which organizations are ready when policymakers seek expertise. Measuring its policy effect requires the next step: tracing funded work into assessments, consultation submissions, official decisions and implementation.</p>\n<p>Start with the <a href=\"/maps/ea-money-and-institutions\">money and institutions map</a>. The companion <a href=\"/maps/ea-funds-and-lightcone\">fund split map</a> shows who is building alternative ways to allocate that capital.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ea-fund-split-2026-09-19",
        "title": "The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons",
        "description": "A documented disagreement over grantmaking constraints, with people and money moving into new arrangements.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons\n\nAn institution's boundaries become visible when its people leave. The August 11 [LTFF closure announcement](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea) gives an unusually direct account.\n\nCaleb Parikh says CEA's legal and reputational constraints affected the grants he would consider. Individuals, companies and policy-adjacent work could be operationally difficult. He regards CEA's tradeoff as reasonable but prefers a different one. The outgoing managers also cite other opportunities and preferences about how grant judgment should be developed.\n\nTheir proposed spend-down divides roughly $2.8 million for existing applicants and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons, from roughly $0.9 million to seed a new CEA-housed Transformative AI Fund. The outgoing managers retain final decisions over their allocation. Commons waives its normal platform and evaluator fees for the LTFF contribution.\n\n## Who allocates the money?\n\n[Lightcone Commons](https://www.lightconecommons.com/) is operated by Lightcone Infrastructure, the organization behind LessWrong and Lighthaven. It is distinct from the similarly named Lightcone Foundation already in the investigation.\n\nCommons' tentative first-round list includes Tallinn with $10 million conditional on another $10 million, Moskovitz with approximately $5 million, and the LTFF and ARM Fund. Confirmed evaluators include Yudkowsky, Soares, Parikh and Habryka. A separate wish list names people who have not agreed; we have not mapped that list as participation.\n\nDonors choose which evaluators to trust and retain final funding discretion. Standard fees add 3% for the platform and 2% for evaluators, with reductions and waivers. The resulting structure gives reputations a practical role in allocating resources. The first-round recommendations are scheduled for October 23, so announced participation cannot yet be read as the resulting grant ledger.\n\n## The people connecting the arrangements\n\nHabryka bridges the outgoing LTFF and the Commons platform he founded. Parikh bridges LTFF, the ARM Fund, Commons evaluation and an advisory role at the new TAIF. [Lowe Lundin heads TAIF](https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai), with a new full-time team.\n\nA further leadership bridge is [Zachary Robinson](https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit): CEA CEO, CEO of its US fiscal sponsor, and previously Open Philanthropy chief of staff. His earlier work included communications, grantmaking teams and organizational policies.\n\nThe forest-level finding is institutional adaptation. Shared people and applicants can continue moving through the network while legal homes, decision rules and incentives change. The next revealing documents are Commons' actual allocations, conflict and recusal arrangements, and the identities and terms of the legal entities handling grants.\n\n[Explore the fund split and Commons map](/maps/ea-funds-and-lightcone).",
        "html": "<h1>The fund split: CEA, LTFF and Lightcone Commons</h1>\n<p>An institution&#x27;s boundaries become visible when its people leave. The August 11 <a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dtZ9wbKWjtvGWDRJx/closing-the-ltff-spending-down-funds-and-a-new-ai-fund-at-ea\">LTFF closure announcement</a> gives an unusually direct account.</p>\n<p>Caleb Parikh says CEA&#x27;s legal and reputational constraints affected the grants he would consider. Individuals, companies and policy-adjacent work could be operationally difficult. He regards CEA&#x27;s tradeoff as reasonable but prefers a different one. The outgoing managers also cite other opportunities and preferences about how grant judgment should be developed.</p>\n<p>Their proposed spend-down divides roughly $2.8 million for existing applicants and longtermist projects, primarily through Commons, from roughly $0.9 million to seed a new CEA-housed Transformative AI Fund. The outgoing managers retain final decisions over their allocation. Commons waives its normal platform and evaluator fees for the LTFF contribution.</p>\n<h2>Who allocates the money?</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.lightconecommons.com/\">Lightcone Commons</a> is operated by Lightcone Infrastructure, the organization behind LessWrong and Lighthaven. It is distinct from the similarly named Lightcone Foundation already in the investigation.</p>\n<p>Commons&#x27; tentative first-round list includes Tallinn with $10 million conditional on another $10 million, Moskovitz with approximately $5 million, and the LTFF and ARM Fund. Confirmed evaluators include Yudkowsky, Soares, Parikh and Habryka. A separate wish list names people who have not agreed; we have not mapped that list as participation.</p>\n<p>Donors choose which evaluators to trust and retain final funding discretion. Standard fees add 3% for the platform and 2% for evaluators, with reductions and waivers. The resulting structure gives reputations a practical role in allocating resources. The first-round recommendations are scheduled for October 23, so announced participation cannot yet be read as the resulting grant ledger.</p>\n<h2>The people connecting the arrangements</h2>\n<p>Habryka bridges the outgoing LTFF and the Commons platform he founded. Parikh bridges LTFF, the ARM Fund, Commons evaluation and an advisory role at the new TAIF. <a href=\"https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/transformative-ai\">Lowe Lundin heads TAIF</a>, with a new full-time team.</p>\n<p>A further leadership bridge is <a href=\"https://www.centreforeffectivealtruism.org/press-kit\">Zachary Robinson</a>: CEA CEO, CEO of its US fiscal sponsor, and previously Open Philanthropy chief of staff. His earlier work included communications, grantmaking teams and organizational policies.</p>\n<p>The forest-level finding is institutional adaptation. Shared people and applicants can continue moving through the network while legal homes, decision rules and incentives change. The next revealing documents are Commons&#x27; actual allocations, conflict and recusal arrangements, and the identities and terms of the legal entities handling grants.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/ea-funds-and-lightcone\">Explore the fund split and Commons map</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ea-policy-careers-2026-09-19",
        "title": "How funded career programmes reach policy",
        "description": "Follow the disclosed foundation grant, training programmes and consultation channels.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# How funded career programmes reach policy\n\n[Coefficient's Effective Giving and Careers update](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers) names a set of policy-talent recipients. They reveal a second way money becomes institutional influence: financing people's preparation for, entry into and participation in public-policy work.\n\n[NEED](https://www.need-network.org/) supports student routes into international-development careers. Its funding disclosure names a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The map records the grantor and adviser separately: those are two roles in the same disclosed arrangement.\n\n[Impactful Policy Careers](https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/) offers an expenses-covered Brussels training week, mentoring and a peer network. Its cohorts cover global health/development and animal welfare/food policy. Coefficient also names Global Policy Research Group's consultation coordination and Renaissance Philanthropy's PEN network for policy entrepreneurs.\n\nThese programmes show how organized career support can help build policy capacity. Their stated mandates matter: the named cohorts and development network are not AI-prohibition programmes. Similar institutional methods can serve different causes.\n\nThe next evidence should identify outcomes: published consultation submissions, public professional appointments, projects launched by participants and official responses. That would let us trace the transition from funded preparation to exercised influence, rather than treating a training opportunity as an accomplished policy victory.\n\n[Open the money and institutions map](/maps/ea-money-and-institutions).",
        "html": "<h1>How funded career programmes reach policy</h1>\n<p><a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/i3iXBWfvRoGAHBrmD/going-bigger-how-we-re-scaling-effective-giving-and-careers\">Coefficient&#x27;s Effective Giving and Careers update</a> names a set of policy-talent recipients. They reveal a second way money becomes institutional influence: financing people&#x27;s preparation for, entry into and participation in public-policy work.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.need-network.org/\">NEED</a> supports student routes into international-development careers. Its funding disclosure names a Silicon Valley Community Foundation grant recommended by Coefficient Giving. The map records the grantor and adviser separately: those are two roles in the same disclosed arrangement.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.impactfulpolicycareers.com/\">Impactful Policy Careers</a> offers an expenses-covered Brussels training week, mentoring and a peer network. Its cohorts cover global health/development and animal welfare/food policy. Coefficient also names Global Policy Research Group&#x27;s consultation coordination and Renaissance Philanthropy&#x27;s PEN network for policy entrepreneurs.</p>\n<p>These programmes show how organized career support can help build policy capacity. Their stated mandates matter: the named cohorts and development network are not AI-prohibition programmes. Similar institutional methods can serve different causes.</p>\n<p>The next evidence should identify outcomes: published consultation submissions, public professional appointments, projects launched by participants and official responses. That would let us trace the transition from funded preparation to exercised influence, rather than treating a training opportunity as an accomplished policy victory.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/ea-money-and-institutions\">Open the money and institutions map</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19",
        "title": "Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator",
        "description": "A $6.8m grant, venture backing, EA career networks and the people linking them to frontier AI testing.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# Irregular: follow the money behind the evaluator\n\n**Further findings:** [The full grant is reported paid, and a third contract commissions evaluation design](/research/irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19).\n\n**New: we obtained a UK contract.** [Read the publication and commercial-reuse terms](/research/irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19), including corrected award values and a separate recorded payment.\n\nThe useful discovery in [Upper Echelon’s September 17 video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu59YscYFhk) is the evaluator itself. Irregular sits between the people supplying capital, the labs building models and the institutions deciding what counts as adequate AI security. Following its public records adds a substantial branch to the EA network we have been mapping.\n\n[Open the funding and people map](/maps/irregular-funding-and-people), or [compare the incident accounts](/research/ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19).\n\n## Philanthropic money before the venture announcement\n\nA [preserved Good Ventures page](https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/) lists a February 2024 grant of $6.8 million over two years to Pattern Labs, recommended by Open Philanthropy, for security-related software and analysis. The record describes a grant, not an equity investment. Good Ventures and Open Philanthropy occupy different roles in that one award.\n\nThe company’s later [launch announcement](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7) explicitly identifies Irregular as the former Pattern Labs and announces $80 million raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. The name change is publicly acknowledged. The earlier grant’s old live URL now redirects to Good Ventures’ giving overview; the historical entry is available in the archive.\n\n[Sequoia’s investment account](https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/) explains the commercial proposition unusually clearly: close work with Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind; pre-release security testing; defenses; and compliance standards and roadmaps. This is a business selling expertise in a field where that expertise can help shape the rules.\n\n## The people connect the institutions\n\nOmer Nevo is Irregular’s co-founder and CTO. [EA Israel](https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95) lists him on its board. [Probably Good](https://probablygood.org/about/) identifies him as its co-founder, former CEO and current director. [Heron](https://www.heronsec.ai/about) lists him as an adviser, names EA Israel as its institutional host and discloses Coefficient Giving funding. Heron helps cybersecurity practitioners find opportunities in AI security.\n\nDan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded [Impact Focused Education](https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about) with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His [current RAND role](https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html) is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.\n\nThe education funding is specific too. [EA Funds’ ledger](https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants), which returns CSV, lists one joint $394,968 grant to Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo in the third quarter of 2022 for an online course about pursuing high-impact work. It does not identify the course or receiving organization, so the map keeps the grant attached to its named recipients.\n\nLahav and Sella Nevo also co-authored RAND’s 2024 [Securing AI Model Weights](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html). The connection is professional work with a published output, reaching beyond shared affiliations.\n\n## What this adds to the bigger picture\n\nOur reading is that this branch joins three kinds of capacity: philanthropic support for a security project, commercial investment in an evaluator, and institutions developing people for adjacent work. The same professional network participates in education, technical services and policy-facing research. That is a stronger and more useful finding than treating every EA connection as interchangeable.\n\nIt also suggests a practical question: when a testing supplier becomes important to several competing labs, how readily can those labs replace it or independently challenge its methods? The next documents with the most value are evaluation contracts, scope approvals, containment checks, notification records, liability terms and the governance of the proposed industry guidance.\n\nThis pass follows the primary records reached through the video and [Effort’s investigation](https://www.effort.news/irregular). The video and full automatic captions are preserved in our private video archive. The public database contains the relationships, source links and this analysis.",
        "html": "<p><strong>Further findings:</strong> <a href=\"/research/irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19\">The full grant is reported paid, and a third contract commissions evaluation design</a>.</p>\n<p><strong>New: we obtained a UK contract.</strong> <a href=\"/research/irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19\">Read the publication and commercial-reuse terms</a>, including corrected award values and a separate recorded payment.</p>\n<p>The useful discovery in <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu59YscYFhk\">Upper Echelon’s September 17 video</a> is the evaluator itself. Irregular sits between the people supplying capital, the labs building models and the institutions deciding what counts as adequate AI security. Following its public records adds a substantial branch to the EA network we have been mapping.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/irregular-funding-and-people\">Open the funding and people map</a>, or <a href=\"/research/ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19\">compare the incident accounts</a>.</p>\n<h2>Philanthropic money before the venture announcement</h2>\n<p>A <a href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20250323082627id_/https://www.goodventures.org/our-portfolio/grants/pattern-labs-technological-risk-mitigation/\">preserved Good Ventures page</a> lists a February 2024 grant of $6.8 million over two years to Pattern Labs, recommended by Open Philanthropy, for security-related software and analysis. The record describes a grant, not an equity investment. Good Ventures and Open Philanthropy occupy different roles in that one award.</p>\n<p>The company’s later <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/posts/omer-nevo-358012108_since-dan-lahav-and-i-founded-irregular-activity-7374058793795489793-TML7\">launch announcement</a> explicitly identifies Irregular as the former Pattern Labs and announces $80 million raised with Sequoia and Redpoint. The name change is publicly acknowledged. The earlier grant’s old live URL now redirects to Good Ventures’ giving overview; the historical entry is available in the archive.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://sequoiacap.com/article/partnering-with-irregular-ahead-of-the-curve/\">Sequoia’s investment account</a> explains the commercial proposition unusually clearly: close work with Anthropic, OpenAI and Google DeepMind; pre-release security testing; defenses; and compliance standards and roadmaps. This is a business selling expertise in a field where that expertise can help shape the rules.</p>\n<h2>The people connect the institutions</h2>\n<p>Omer Nevo is Irregular’s co-founder and CTO. <a href=\"https://www.effective-altruism.org.il/%D7%A2%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95\">EA Israel</a> lists him on its board. <a href=\"https://probablygood.org/about/\">Probably Good</a> identifies him as its co-founder, former CEO and current director. <a href=\"https://www.heronsec.ai/about\">Heron</a> lists him as an adviser, names EA Israel as its institutional host and discloses Coefficient Giving funding. Heron helps cybersecurity practitioners find opportunities in AI security.</p>\n<p>Dan Lahav, Irregular’s co-founder and CEO, co-founded <a href=\"https://www.impactfocusededucation.org/about\">Impact Focused Education</a> with Sella Nevo. Sella also co-founded Probably Good and remains a director. His <a href=\"https://www.rand.org/about/people/n/nevo_sella.html\">current RAND role</a> is founding director of the Center on AI, Security, and Technology. Older partner biographies still describe the Meselson Center role.</p>\n<p>The education funding is specific too. <a href=\"https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/api/grants\">EA Funds’ ledger</a>, which returns CSV, lists one joint $394,968 grant to Dan Lahav and Sella Nevo in the third quarter of 2022 for an online course about pursuing high-impact work. It does not identify the course or receiving organization, so the map keeps the grant attached to its named recipients.</p>\n<p>Lahav and Sella Nevo also co-authored RAND’s 2024 <a href=\"https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2849-1.html\">Securing AI Model Weights</a>. The connection is professional work with a published output, reaching beyond shared affiliations.</p>\n<h2>What this adds to the bigger picture</h2>\n<p>Our reading is that this branch joins three kinds of capacity: philanthropic support for a security project, commercial investment in an evaluator, and institutions developing people for adjacent work. The same professional network participates in education, technical services and policy-facing research. That is a stronger and more useful finding than treating every EA connection as interchangeable.</p>\n<p>It also suggests a practical question: when a testing supplier becomes important to several competing labs, how readily can those labs replace it or independently challenge its methods? The next documents with the most value are evaluation contracts, scope approvals, containment checks, notification records, liability terms and the governance of the proposed industry guidance.</p>\n<p>This pass follows the primary records reached through the video and <a href=\"https://www.effort.news/irregular\">Effort’s investigation</a>. The video and full automatic captions are preserved in our private video archive. The public database contains the relationships, source links and this analysis.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19",
        "title": "AI incidents: what the tests actually show",
        "description": "Separate the shared supplier’s failures, OpenAI’s Hugging Face escape and the institutional response.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# AI incidents: what the tests actually show\n\nAn AI incident is also a record of human decisions: the task assigned, the systems exposed, the safeguards removed and the point at which someone stopped the run. Those details determine what the incident demonstrates and who needs to answer for it.\n\n[Open the evaluator and oversight map](/maps/irregular-labs-and-oversight), or [follow Irregular’s money and people](/research/irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19).\n\n## Different incidents need different explanations\n\n[Anthropic’s July disclosure](https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals) identifies Irregular as the partner whose supposedly isolated exercises had live internet access. Models were told they were in simulations. Its [September assessment](https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents) expands the account to four incidents across seven runs. These were individual Claude instances, not coordinated swarms. Prompts omitted explicit target boundaries; the runs lasted roughly 10–34 hours.\n\n[OpenAI’s August 4 statement](https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/) describes a separate Irregular incident: a fictional target name overlapped a real website, and an unintended internet connection let a model reach it. The same statement covers a different UK AISI evaluation with deliberately enabled internet access. It expressly distinguishes both from Hugging Face.\n\nThe [Hugging Face account](https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/) describes models obtaining internet access through a package-proxy vulnerability during OpenAI’s own evaluation. That is not the same mechanism as an already-open connection. The existing [METR investigation](https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/) examines that case; it should not be silently reassigned to Irregular.\n\n[AP reports](https://apnews.com/article/meta-ai-hacking-anthropic-irregular-openai-0e8061437da6779be962b24ac134a514) that Meta also hired Irregular and disclosed an internet-access misconfiguration. The map marks this relationship as reported from company statements. We have not acquired a standalone Meta postmortem.\n\n## The test conditions matter—and so does the comparison\n\nAnthropic’s September report says one particularly explicit correction of a model’s simulation assumption eliminated a particular malicious-package upload route in resampling. Other interventions and models behaved differently. That result is useful evidence about prompting and authorization; it is not a universal zero-harm result.\n\nThe same report revises Anthropic’s earlier interpretation: it now assigns more significance to biased reasoning and reckless task pursuit, while retaining the containment failure as the immediate cause. Operational responsibility and model behavior both need examination. Treating either as the entire explanation loses information.\n\n## The supplier helps write the response\n\n[Irregular’s August 14 account](https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward) focuses on the shared domain-collision scenario, says it repaired access controls and outlines a white paper on evaluation practice. It also describes the practical pressure of complex tests and short delivery windows.\n\nOpenAI’s August statement affirms its continuing partnership with Irregular and its intention to contribute to that guidance. Here is the institutional consequence: a supplier involved in a testing failure remains a trusted expert in defining the remedy. That may preserve valuable expertise. It also makes independent scrutiny of the proposed remedy essential.\n\nAnthropic separately announced an agreement for METR to investigate its incidents. METR’s earlier OpenAI investigation says it took no fee, but accepted free OpenAI API credits and estimates using roughly $400,000 during the investigation. A foundation funding an evaluator and an audited company paying for a specific review are different financial relationships; the records should show which actually occurred.\n\n## The question worth carrying forward\n\nUpper Echelon argues that the incidents were manufactured to help consolidate control. This pass establishes funding, shared suppliers, operational failures and continuing influence over evaluation practice. It does not establish deliberate staging or an instruction chain to cause the incidents.\n\nThe concrete issue is already substantial: who approved these tests, who bore the external harm, who can independently inspect what happened, and who will decide whether the fix is enough? Follow those decisions and their contractual consequences. They are where the argument about power becomes testable.",
        "html": "<p>An AI incident is also a record of human decisions: the task assigned, the systems exposed, the safeguards removed and the point at which someone stopped the run. Those details determine what the incident demonstrates and who needs to answer for it.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/irregular-labs-and-oversight\">Open the evaluator and oversight map</a>, or <a href=\"/research/irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19\">follow Irregular’s money and people</a>.</p>\n<h2>Different incidents need different explanations</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals\">Anthropic’s July disclosure</a> identifies Irregular as the partner whose supposedly isolated exercises had live internet access. Models were told they were in simulations. Its <a href=\"https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybersecurity-incidents\">September assessment</a> expands the account to four incidents across seven runs. These were individual Claude instances, not coordinated swarms. Prompts omitted explicit target boundaries; the runs lasted roughly 10–34 hours.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/\">OpenAI’s August 4 statement</a> describes a separate Irregular incident: a fictional target name overlapped a real website, and an unintended internet connection let a model reach it. The same statement covers a different UK AISI evaluation with deliberately enabled internet access. It expressly distinguishes both from Hugging Face.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/\">Hugging Face account</a> describes models obtaining internet access through a package-proxy vulnerability during OpenAI’s own evaluation. That is not the same mechanism as an already-open connection. The existing <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/\">METR investigation</a> examines that case; it should not be silently reassigned to Irregular.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://apnews.com/article/meta-ai-hacking-anthropic-irregular-openai-0e8061437da6779be962b24ac134a514\">AP reports</a> that Meta also hired Irregular and disclosed an internet-access misconfiguration. The map marks this relationship as reported from company statements. We have not acquired a standalone Meta postmortem.</p>\n<h2>The test conditions matter—and so does the comparison</h2>\n<p>Anthropic’s September report says one particularly explicit correction of a model’s simulation assumption eliminated a particular malicious-package upload route in resampling. Other interventions and models behaved differently. That result is useful evidence about prompting and authorization; it is not a universal zero-harm result.</p>\n<p>The same report revises Anthropic’s earlier interpretation: it now assigns more significance to biased reasoning and reckless task pursuit, while retaining the containment failure as the immediate cause. Operational responsibility and model behavior both need examination. Treating either as the entire explanation loses information.</p>\n<h2>The supplier helps write the response</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.irregular.com/research/addressing-recent-incidents-ongoing-findings-and-path-forward\">Irregular’s August 14 account</a> focuses on the shared domain-collision scenario, says it repaired access controls and outlines a white paper on evaluation practice. It also describes the practical pressure of complex tests and short delivery windows.</p>\n<p>OpenAI’s August statement affirms its continuing partnership with Irregular and its intention to contribute to that guidance. Here is the institutional consequence: a supplier involved in a testing failure remains a trusted expert in defining the remedy. That may preserve valuable expertise. It also makes independent scrutiny of the proposed remedy essential.</p>\n<p>Anthropic separately announced an agreement for METR to investigate its incidents. METR’s earlier OpenAI investigation says it took no fee, but accepted free OpenAI API credits and estimates using roughly $400,000 during the investigation. A foundation funding an evaluator and an audited company paying for a specific review are different financial relationships; the records should show which actually occurred.</p>\n<h2>The question worth carrying forward</h2>\n<p>Upper Echelon argues that the incidents were manufactured to help consolidate control. This pass establishes funding, shared suppliers, operational failures and continuing influence over evaluation practice. It does not establish deliberate staging or an instruction chain to cause the incidents.</p>\n<p>The concrete issue is already substantial: who approved these tests, who bore the external harm, who can independently inspect what happened, and who will decide whether the fix is enough? Follow those decisions and their contractual consequences. They are where the argument about power becomes testable.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-security-research-and-the-market-it-proposes-2026-09-19",
        "title": "AI security research—and the market it proposes",
        "description": "A security supplier’s published conflict disclosure makes the commercial stakes in its policy work explicit.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# AI security research—and the market it proposes\n\nIrregular is participating in the design of the security field in which it sells services. Its [August announcement](https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda) presents a research collaboration with RAND and other specialists, intended to guide investment and institutional action.\n\nThe [paper’s disclosure](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069) says its red-teaming, auditing and public-private investment recommendations could expand Irregular’s market. Company researchers helped design the study; its founders hold equity. RAND reports independent reviewers specifically examined those conflicts. The methods describe five initial interviews, fourteen workshop participants and seven effort scorers: an expert prioritization exercise, not a representative survey.\n\n## Why this belongs on the map\n\nThe useful question is what happens when a supplier’s expertise becomes an institution’s definition of necessary security. A government, insurer or procurement officer could eventually use an accepted standard to decide whose service is acceptable. That would turn technical judgment into a condition of market participation. This paper offers recommendations; tracing any later adoption requires another record.\n\nDisclosure makes the commercial alignment visible. It does not settle whether a recommendation is sound. That judgment requires testing the method, alternatives and likely consequences—including who pays and who gets to challenge the result.\n\n[Follow Irregular’s funding and professional network](/maps/irregular-funding-and-people). The next useful records are commissions, standards-group decisions and procurement criteria showing which proposals were actually taken up.",
        "html": "<p>Irregular is participating in the design of the security field in which it sells services. Its <a href=\"https://www.irregular.com/research/ai-security-priorities-a-field-wide-agenda\">August announcement</a> presents a research collaboration with RAND and other specialists, intended to guide investment and institutional action.</p><p>The <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.26069\">paper’s disclosure</a> says its red-teaming, auditing and public-private investment recommendations could expand Irregular’s market. Company researchers helped design the study; its founders hold equity. RAND reports independent reviewers specifically examined those conflicts. The methods describe five initial interviews, fourteen workshop participants and seven effort scorers: an expert prioritization exercise, not a representative survey.</p><h2>Why this belongs on the map</h2><p>The useful question is what happens when a supplier’s expertise becomes an institution’s definition of necessary security. A government, insurer or procurement officer could eventually use an accepted standard to decide whose service is acceptable. That would turn technical judgment into a condition of market participation. This paper offers recommendations; tracing any later adoption requires another record.</p><p>Disclosure makes the commercial alignment visible. It does not settle whether a recommendation is sound. That judgment requires testing the method, alternatives and likely consequences—including who pays and who gets to challenge the result.</p><p><a href=\"/maps/irregular-funding-and-people\">Follow Irregular’s funding and professional network</a>. The next useful records are commissions, standards-group decisions and procurement criteria showing which proposals were actually taken up.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "w48-cap-funding-research-and-advice",
        "title": "How funding becomes research capacity—and influence",
        "description": "Conditional grants, laboratory API credits and the work they turn into.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# How funding becomes research capacity—and influence\n\nA grant can do more than keep an organization alive. It can determine which teams exist, how quickly they grow and what resources they can use. This part of the network now contains enough detail to follow that process beyond the headline amounts.\n\n## The conditions behind the money\n\n[Resolution’s announcement](https://resolution.org/post/funding) divides its $160m Coefficient award into a $108m base and $52m conditional on hiring success and compute needs. The base also supports some onward grants. Those conditions connect institutional growth to the release of resources; the announcement does not disclose the detailed milestones or payment schedule.\n\n[OpenAI then supplied $10m in API credits](https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits), intended for work including automated formal proofs. That support gives the laboratory a practical place in the research operation alongside its philanthropic funder. The credits are resources tied to a particular provider, rather than unrestricted cash.\n\n## Shared funding does not settle the strategy\n\nResolution’s [new Agent Foundations team](https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team) openly carries forward a MIRI-adjacent research tradition. Jeremy Gillen’s joining statement also questions whether some research automation could accelerate dangerous capabilities. He explicitly withholds blanket endorsement of the organization’s other work. A well-financed institution can contain a real dispute over what progress should mean.\n\n## From a funded project to something people use\n\nEpoch reports [a $2.74m Coefficient grant](https://epoch.ai/about/transparency) for its data-center tracker. Its [September expansion](https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research) describes a public explorer covering 86 facilities and an estimated 44% of global AI compute. Here the output can actually be inspected: satellite images, capacity estimates and construction histories.\n\nEpoch also supplies technical consultations and benchmark work to government and industry. Redwood, another Coefficient grantee, [describes advisory relationships](https://www.redwoodresearch.org/) with DeepMind and Anthropic and a joint safety-case paper with UK AISI. Funding sustains the people who produce the measurements and frameworks institutions consult when making decisions.\n\n## Who makes the choices?\n\n[Coefficient’s structure](https://coefficientgiving.org/governance/) separates its research and operating employers from the entities awarding grants. Its [Tailwind programme](https://coefficientgiving.org/tailwind/faqs/) selects prospective founders addressing catastrophic AI risk, offering support from early exploration through major expansion. Selection begins before an organization even exists.\n\nMoskovitz’s [September 11 statement](https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o) connects his support for METR and Redwood to investigations, public communication and policy advice. He separately says Anthropic shares sit [in his foundation](https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3miawblqk7224), and identifies [Good Ventures as a beneficiary](https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mtygcpxluc2b) of Anthropic’s growth. The legal shareholding vehicle remains unnamed in those statements.\n\nThe picture is increasingly concrete: capital builds research capacity; compute suppliers furnish its tools; researchers develop measurements and advice; public and private decision-makers use that work. The next question is whose judgments survive disagreement—and what a funder, supplier or client can require through the agreement.\n\n[Open the research-capacity map](/maps/w48-cap-research-capacity).\n",
        "html": "<p>A grant can do more than keep an organization alive. It can determine which teams exist, how quickly they grow and what resources they can use. This part of the network now contains enough detail to follow that process beyond the headline amounts.</p>\n<h2>The conditions behind the money</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://resolution.org/post/funding\">Resolution’s announcement</a> divides its $160m Coefficient award into a $108m base and $52m conditional on hiring success and compute needs. The base also supports some onward grants. Those conditions connect institutional growth to the release of resources; the announcement does not disclose the detailed milestones or payment schedule.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://resolution.org/post/openai-api-credits\">OpenAI then supplied $10m in API credits</a>, intended for work including automated formal proofs. That support gives the laboratory a practical place in the research operation alongside its philanthropic funder. The credits are resources tied to a particular provider, rather than unrestricted cash.</p>\n<h2>Shared funding does not settle the strategy</h2>\n<p>Resolution’s <a href=\"https://resolution.org/post/agent-foundations-team\">new Agent Foundations team</a> openly carries forward a MIRI-adjacent research tradition. Jeremy Gillen’s joining statement also questions whether some research automation could accelerate dangerous capabilities. He explicitly withholds blanket endorsement of the organization’s other work. A well-financed institution can contain a real dispute over what progress should mean.</p>\n<h2>From a funded project to something people use</h2>\n<p>Epoch reports <a href=\"https://epoch.ai/about/transparency\">a $2.74m Coefficient grant</a> for its data-center tracker. Its <a href=\"https://epoch.ai/latest/scaling-ai-data-centers-research\">September expansion</a> describes a public explorer covering 86 facilities and an estimated 44% of global AI compute. Here the output can actually be inspected: satellite images, capacity estimates and construction histories.</p>\n<p>Epoch also supplies technical consultations and benchmark work to government and industry. Redwood, another Coefficient grantee, <a href=\"https://www.redwoodresearch.org/\">describes advisory relationships</a> with DeepMind and Anthropic and a joint safety-case paper with UK AISI. Funding sustains the people who produce the measurements and frameworks institutions consult when making decisions.</p>\n<h2>Who makes the choices?</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://coefficientgiving.org/governance/\">Coefficient’s structure</a> separates its research and operating employers from the entities awarding grants. Its <a href=\"https://coefficientgiving.org/tailwind/faqs/\">Tailwind programme</a> selects prospective founders addressing catastrophic AI risk, offering support from early exploration through major expansion. Selection begins before an organization even exists.</p>\n<p>Moskovitz’s <a href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mvaqtffuwc2o\">September 11 statement</a> connects his support for METR and Redwood to investigations, public communication and policy advice. He separately says Anthropic shares sit <a href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3miawblqk7224\">in his foundation</a>, and identifies <a href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/moskov.goodventures.org/post/3mtygcpxluc2b\">Good Ventures as a beneficiary</a> of Anthropic’s growth. The legal shareholding vehicle remains unnamed in those statements.</p>\n<p>The picture is increasingly concrete: capital builds research capacity; compute suppliers furnish its tools; researchers develop measurements and advice; public and private decision-makers use that work. The next question is whose judgments survive disagreement—and what a funder, supplier or client can require through the agreement.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/w48-cap-research-capacity\">Open the research-capacity map</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "embedded-evaluators-and-commercial-partners-2026-09-19",
        "title": "The new assessor already helps deploy Claude",
        "description": "Accenture adds paid scrutiny to its existing Anthropic commercial partnership.",
        "markdown": "# The new assessor already helps deploy Claude\n\nAnthropic's September 18 evaluator announcement adds a substantial commercial relationship to this investigation. Faculty, now part of Accenture, will lead embedded evaluation of Anthropic models. The work includes alignment assessment, model testing and safeguards. Anthropic will pay Accenture directly. Its discussions with METR about self-funded nonprofit pilots describe a separate arrangement. [Anthropic's announcement](https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation).\n\nAccenture was already helping expand Claude's market. In December 2025 the companies announced an Accenture Anthropic Business Group: roughly 30,000 professionals to train, joint industry offerings and a co-invested Claude Center of Excellence. That makes commercial expansion part of the assessor's existing relationship with its subject. [The earlier partnership](https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries).\n\nThere is an actual product connecting them. Accenture launched Cyber.AI in March with Claude as its central reasoning engine and reported deploying it in its own infrastructure. Its Agent Shield component addresses oversight of autonomous agents. These are corporate product and deployment statements; the performance figures have not been independently verified here. [Cyber.AI](https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations).\n\nFaculty brings a specialist business into that arrangement. Companies House records Accenture plc control of Faculty Science Limited from March 12: at least 75% of shares and votes, plus director appointment/removal rights. Completion was announced March 16, with Faculty CEO Marc Warner additionally becoming Accenture CTO. [Filed control](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control); [completion](https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty).\n\nThe partners each expect at least $1 billion in AI-safety investment over five years. That is an announced intention, not a $2 billion evaluation fee. Their releases do not supply the publication, removal, dispute or conflict-separation provisions that will govern an adverse assessment. [Accenture's announcement](https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic).\n\nAnthropic's June policy framework offers a revealing comparison. It proposes evaluator qualification, conflict disclosures, pooled financing and measures against shopping for accommodating reviewers. Those proposals are not the subsequent commercial agreement. The next useful document is that agreement, followed by evidence of how it handles an actual disagreement. [Framework, pages 7-8](https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf).\n\nMETR's separate OpenAI incident review illustrates another dependence. It charged no assessment fee, but estimates using about $400,000 in free OpenAI API credits. METR also says preserving future voluntary access influenced drafting, editing and redaction judgments. It stands by its substantive conclusions. [Report, setup and footnotes 5 and 7](https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/).\n\nThis is where access and obligation matter more than the word independent. An implementation company may bring valuable expertise to scrutiny. Its ability to publish unwelcome findings, retain access and resist commercial pressure determines how much assurance the public receives. [Explore the relationships](/maps/embedded-evaluation-commercial-network).\n",
        "html": "<p>Anthropic&#x27;s September 18 evaluator announcement adds a substantial commercial relationship to this investigation. Faculty, now part of Accenture, will lead embedded evaluation of Anthropic models. The work includes alignment assessment, model testing and safeguards. Anthropic will pay Accenture directly. Its discussions with METR about self-funded nonprofit pilots describe a separate arrangement. <a href=\"https://www.anthropic.com/news/accenture-embedded-evaluation\">Anthropic&#x27;s announcement</a>.</p>\n<p>Accenture was already helping expand Claude&#x27;s market. In December 2025 the companies announced an Accenture Anthropic Business Group: roughly 30,000 professionals to train, joint industry offerings and a co-invested Claude Center of Excellence. That makes commercial expansion part of the assessor&#x27;s existing relationship with its subject. <a href=\"https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2025/accenture-and-anthropic-launch-multi-year-partnership-to-drive-enterprise-ai-innovation-and-value-across-industries\">The earlier partnership</a>.</p>\n<p>There is an actual product connecting them. Accenture launched Cyber.AI in March with Claude as its central reasoning engine and reported deploying it in its own infrastructure. Its Agent Shield component addresses oversight of autonomous agents. These are corporate product and deployment statements; the performance figures have not been independently verified here. <a href=\"https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-team-to-help-organizations-secure-scale-ai-driven-cybersecurity-operations\">Cyber.AI</a>.</p>\n<p>Faculty brings a specialist business into that arrangement. Companies House records Accenture plc control of Faculty Science Limited from March 12: at least 75% of shares and votes, plus director appointment/removal rights. Completion was announced March 16, with Faculty CEO Marc Warner additionally becoming Accenture CTO. <a href=\"https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08873131/persons-with-significant-control\">Filed control</a>; <a href=\"https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-completes-acquisition-of-faculty\">completion</a>.</p>\n<p>The partners each expect at least $1 billion in AI-safety investment over five years. That is an announced intention, not a $2 billion evaluation fee. Their releases do not supply the publication, removal, dispute or conflict-separation provisions that will govern an adverse assessment. <a href=\"https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-and-anthropic-partner-to-build-team-of-embedded-evaluators-at-anthropic\">Accenture&#x27;s announcement</a>.</p>\n<p>Anthropic&#x27;s June policy framework offers a revealing comparison. It proposes evaluator qualification, conflict disclosures, pooled financing and measures against shopping for accommodating reviewers. Those proposals are not the subsequent commercial agreement. The next useful document is that agreement, followed by evidence of how it handles an actual disagreement. <a href=\"https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/files/4zrzovbb/website/0a58d567024a8b448ff15158ebc3625328dfcc1f.pdf\">Framework, pages 7-8</a>.</p>\n<p>METR&#x27;s separate OpenAI incident review illustrates another dependence. It charged no assessment fee, but estimates using about $400,000 in free OpenAI API credits. METR also says preserving future voluntary access influenced drafting, editing and redaction judgments. It stands by its substantive conclusions. <a href=\"https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation/\">Report, setup and footnotes 5 and 7</a>.</p>\n<p>This is where access and obligation matter more than the word independent. An implementation company may bring valuable expertise to scrutiny. Its ability to publish unwelcome findings, retain access and resist commercial pressure determines how much assurance the public receives. <a href=\"/maps/embedded-evaluation-commercial-network\">Explore the relationships</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "pro-human-coalition-operating-structure-2026-09-19",
        "title": "The assembly launched an operating coalition",
        "description": "A new organization combines policy, technology, capital and campaign capacity.",
        "markdown": "# The assembly launched an operating coalition\n\nThe September 15 Pro-Human Assembly now has a concrete institutional outcome: the Pro-Human AI Coalition. Project Liberty's launch statement identifies three organizational co-founders—Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact—and names Mila and Omidyar Network in its steering structure. The coalition is described as an independent nonprofit. [Launch announcement](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html).\n\nIts significance is shared capacity. The launch says members can exchange intelligence, mobilize capital and use common services. It reports fourteen supported projects and a tracker covering more than 500 bills. These are the organizer's operational claims; project budgets and the bill-level attribution behind claimed legislative successes remain useful records to obtain.\n\nThe public workstreams join policy coordination, alternative AI architecture, cooperation among countries outside the US-China pair, persuasion and market incentives. The website names Tomicah Tillemann as CEO and Lara Galinsky as executive director. Members shown include ControlAI, the Center for AI Safety and Minderoo Foundation. A member logo, a steering seat and a funding commitment are different relationships. [The coalition's structure](https://prohumanai.co/).\n\nOne administrative relationship is explicit: the privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as the website operator. That supplies a service responsibility, while the coalition's incorporation and detailed governing rules remain to be located. [Operator disclosure](https://prohumanai.co/privacy).\n\nThe assembly also provided a practical distribution tool: reusable graphics and prepared captions through a public sharing page. This documents coordinated communications infrastructure. It does not measure who used it or how far the messaging travelled. [Event toolkit](https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/).\n\nPolitical demands were visible too. Sanders's office published prepared remarks announcing legislation for the following week and advocating binding international controls. Casar subsequently described his own position in a same-day CNN interview. Those statements establish advocacy, not an enacted law or a common platform adopted by every participant. [Sanders's remarks](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/prepared-remarks-sanders-regulating-ai-is-as-american-as-apple-pie/); [Casar interview](https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12).\n\nThe useful next questions are finite: who appoints the steering group, allocates money, selects the fourteen projects and approves a shared campaign? Those rights will explain how this coalition operates. Coxon's earlier reported withdrawal remains intact; Sanders mentioning his resignation does not establish attendance. [Explore the coalition](/maps/pro-human-coalition-structure).\n",
        "html": "<p>The September 15 Pro-Human Assembly now has a concrete institutional outcome: the Pro-Human AI Coalition. Project Liberty&#x27;s launch statement identifies three organizational co-founders—Project Liberty, Future of Life Institute and Ergo Impact—and names Mila and Omidyar Network in its steering structure. The coalition is described as an independent nonprofit. <a href=\"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/50-leading-organizations-launch-coalition-for-pro-human-ai-302879308.html\">Launch announcement</a>.</p>\n<p>Its significance is shared capacity. The launch says members can exchange intelligence, mobilize capital and use common services. It reports fourteen supported projects and a tracker covering more than 500 bills. These are the organizer&#x27;s operational claims; project budgets and the bill-level attribution behind claimed legislative successes remain useful records to obtain.</p>\n<p>The public workstreams join policy coordination, alternative AI architecture, cooperation among countries outside the US-China pair, persuasion and market incentives. The website names Tomicah Tillemann as CEO and Lara Galinsky as executive director. Members shown include ControlAI, the Center for AI Safety and Minderoo Foundation. A member logo, a steering seat and a funding commitment are different relationships. <a href=\"https://prohumanai.co/\">The coalition&#x27;s structure</a>.</p>\n<p>One administrative relationship is explicit: the privacy notice identifies Project Liberty Institute as the website operator. That supplies a service responsibility, while the coalition&#x27;s incorporation and detailed governing rules remain to be located. <a href=\"https://prohumanai.co/privacy\">Operator disclosure</a>.</p>\n<p>The assembly also provided a practical distribution tool: reusable graphics and prepared captions through a public sharing page. This documents coordinated communications infrastructure. It does not measure who used it or how far the messaging travelled. <a href=\"https://prohumanassembly.org/socials/\">Event toolkit</a>.</p>\n<p>Political demands were visible too. Sanders&#x27;s office published prepared remarks announcing legislation for the following week and advocating binding international controls. Casar subsequently described his own position in a same-day CNN interview. Those statements establish advocacy, not an enacted law or a common platform adopted by every participant. <a href=\"https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/prepared-remarks-sanders-regulating-ai-is-as-american-as-apple-pie/\">Sanders&#x27;s remarks</a>; <a href=\"https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnc/date/2026-09-15/segment/12\">Casar interview</a>.</p>\n<p>The useful next questions are finite: who appoints the steering group, allocates money, selects the fourteen projects and approves a shared campaign? Those rights will explain how this coalition operates. Coxon&#x27;s earlier reported withdrawal remains intact; Sanders mentioning his resignation does not establish attendance. <a href=\"/maps/pro-human-coalition-structure\">Explore the coalition</a>.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "w48-commons-authority",
        "title": "Who can actually authorize a grant?",
        "description": "Commons discretion, fiscal hosting and a completed specialist-fund round.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# Who can actually authorize a grant?\n\nLightcone Commons makes a useful distinction visible: choosing where money ought to go and possessing the authority to send it are different jobs. Its published process lets funders bring evaluators or use those selected by Oliver Habryka. Funders retain a last opportunity to veto direct grants after recipients sign agreements. Lightcone can refuse transactions through its own nonprofit or LLC facilities, while funders can arrange payment themselves. The FAQ does not name both legal counterparties. [Commons process](https://www.lightconecommons.com/)\n\nThat makes the movement of the AI Risk Mitigation Fund significant. In a December 2025 fundraising account, Habryka announced that ARM had become a Lightcone programme under substantial leadership from Caleb Parikh. ARM's own website still describes donations through Effective Ventures' US or UK charities. The announced move is clear; a current sponsorship instrument would settle how outstanding restrictions and liabilities travelled with it. [Lightcone account](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026), [ARM disclosure](https://www.airiskfund.com/about)\n\nA smaller programme supplies a completed example. The Corrigibility Research Fund names Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as its legal grantmaker and final approver. Max Harms manages the fund. On September 3 he announced eight awards totalling $132,000, following more than 100 applications, and directed future applicants to Commons. Ian Kahn was awarded $35,000 and Ben Saudek $3,000; Harms says both first contacted him after his appearance on the 80,000 Hours podcast. Here is a visible sequence from public communication to professional contact to funding. [Fund structure](https://corrigibilityresearch.org/), [awards](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1)\n\nHarms also describes how judgment was exercised: his initial screening was followed by Claude-assisted reviews, with human reconsideration and overrides. He explicitly values grants that redirect capable people towards alignment careers. The project being purchased and the future workforce being cultivated are both part of the decision. [Evaluation account](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications)\n\nThe safeguards deserve the same specificity. EA Funds' published conflict policy grades recusals by severity but permits carefully considered exceptions; public disclosure of recusals is optional. Separately, on July 22 Habryka said a resolution correcting Lightcone's board-removal arrangements had been drafted but remained unsigned, and publicly committed to treating the board as able to remove him. That statement establishes an unresolved step on that date; the signed instrument would establish what followed. [EA Funds policy](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSN-VoZLgy1U676-vuLK_fOL6mcQ_K1qGWXzlBhQJg0/edit), [dated governance discussion](https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform/comment/3hEaTozjsDv9KFYTJ)\n\nThe practical network consists of admission decisions, recommendations, payment authority and accountability. Mapping each separately reveals where discretion really sits.\n",
        "html": "<p>Lightcone Commons makes a useful distinction visible: choosing where money ought to go and possessing the authority to send it are different jobs. Its published process lets funders bring evaluators or use those selected by Oliver Habryka. Funders retain a last opportunity to veto direct grants after recipients sign agreements. Lightcone can refuse transactions through its own nonprofit or LLC facilities, while funders can arrange payment themselves. The FAQ does not name both legal counterparties. <a href=\"https://www.lightconecommons.com/\">Commons process</a></p>\n<p>That makes the movement of the AI Risk Mitigation Fund significant. In a December 2025 fundraising account, Habryka announced that ARM had become a Lightcone programme under substantial leadership from Caleb Parikh. ARM&#x27;s own website still describes donations through Effective Ventures&#x27; US or UK charities. The announced move is clear; a current sponsorship instrument would settle how outstanding restrictions and liabilities travelled with it. <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/eKGdCNdKjvTBG9i6y/toss-a-bitcoin-to-your-lightcone-lw-lighthaven-s-2026\">Lightcone account</a>, <a href=\"https://www.airiskfund.com/about\">ARM disclosure</a></p>\n<p>A smaller programme supplies a completed example. The Corrigibility Research Fund names Lightcone Infrastructure Inc. as its legal grantmaker and final approver. Max Harms manages the fund. On September 3 he announced eight awards totalling $132,000, following more than 100 applications, and directed future applicants to Commons. Ian Kahn was awarded $35,000 and Ben Saudek $3,000; Harms says both first contacted him after his appearance on the 80,000 Hours podcast. Here is a visible sequence from public communication to professional contact to funding. <a href=\"https://corrigibilityresearch.org/\">Fund structure</a>, <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CKArJ4GAQGFjnhjx6/corrigibility-research-fund-grantees-round-1\">awards</a></p>\n<p>Harms also describes how judgment was exercised: his initial screening was followed by Claude-assisted reviews, with human reconsideration and overrides. He explicitly values grants that redirect capable people towards alignment careers. The project being purchased and the future workforce being cultivated are both part of the decision. <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications\">Evaluation account</a></p>\n<p>The safeguards deserve the same specificity. EA Funds&#x27; published conflict policy grades recusals by severity but permits carefully considered exceptions; public disclosure of recusals is optional. Separately, on July 22 Habryka said a resolution correcting Lightcone&#x27;s board-removal arrangements had been drafted but remained unsigned, and publicly committed to treating the board as able to remove him. That statement establishes an unresolved step on that date; the signed instrument would establish what followed. <a href=\"https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fSN-VoZLgy1U676-vuLK_fOL6mcQ_K1qGWXzlBhQJg0/edit\">EA Funds policy</a>, <a href=\"https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform/comment/3hEaTozjsDv9KFYTJ\">dated governance discussion</a></p>\n<p>The practical network consists of admission decisions, recommendations, payment authority and accountability. Mapping each separately reveals where discretion really sits.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "w48-eu-kids-machinery",
        "title": "The EU proposes an age gate—and the machinery behind it",
        "description": "The actual September 17 proposal adds certification, audit and supervision financing.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# The EU proposes an age gate—and the machinery behind it\n\nThe Commission's September 17 KIDS Act proposal turns the earlier leaked draft into something we can inspect. This is the Commission's proposed regulation, awaiting the legislative process. Its stated purpose combines child protection with a single European framework. [Official publication](https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy)\n\nThe headline is access by age. For covered social and video services, independent accounts would start at 15; guardians could create restricted accounts at 13–14, capped at an hour daily. Younger children would have a narrow, supervised video route. Existing accounts would face checks, with high-confidence exceptions. [Commission explanation](https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/kids-act-explained)\n\nLook underneath the age limit. Articles 5 and 36 would require provider-paid audits and supervisory fees; those fees explicitly support the EU Age Verification Scheme. Article 29 would route covered account checks through certified third-party credentials on EU lists. Operating systems would share an already-obtained age signal with consent. Article 28 would require zero-knowledge proof and prohibit identification or tracking through age assurance. Article 8 would make child-protective design the default unless adulthood is established. Privacy protection and compulsory access sorting are being designed together. [Proposal, Articles 5, 8 and 28–36](https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132530)\n\nThe accompanying Communication extends the picture to AI companions, games and app stores: product-design obligations, regulated recommendations and app age ratings alongside the access rules. Enforcement builds on the DSA and AI Act. This combines public rulemaking with private implementation, assessment and distribution. [Commission Communication, sections 2.2–2.4](https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132528)\n\nOne revealing detail sits in the impact analysis. An additional rights-and-cost study was commissioned in August, with final publication expected in the fourth quarter. The document also sees wider e-government benefits from expanded digital-identity coverage. It cites earlier 5Rights and WeProtect material. Those are traceable inputs into the evidence base; authorship and influence on particular clauses need their own records. [Analysis of impacts, pp. 14, 49 and 75–76](https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132529)\n\nOur reading: the consequential change is a proposed division of labour. Government defines acceptable access and technical requirements; approved verification systems supply credentials; services apply them; auditors assess compliance; industry fees fund supervision. The next investigation should follow who wins those implementation roles and what decisions they can actually make. The specification, certification list, contracts and review procedures are where the institutional outline becomes an operating system.\n",
        "html": "<p>The Commission&#x27;s September 17 KIDS Act proposal turns the earlier leaked draft into something we can inspect. This is the Commission&#x27;s proposed regulation, awaiting the legislative process. Its stated purpose combines child protection with a single European framework. <a href=\"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-eu-kids-act-eu-keeping-internet-digital-spaces-accountable-and-trustworthy\">Official publication</a></p>\n<p>The headline is access by age. For covered social and video services, independent accounts would start at 15; guardians could create restricted accounts at 13–14, capped at an hour daily. Younger children would have a narrow, supervised video route. Existing accounts would face checks, with high-confidence exceptions. <a href=\"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/kids-act-explained\">Commission explanation</a></p>\n<p>Look underneath the age limit. Articles 5 and 36 would require provider-paid audits and supervisory fees; those fees explicitly support the EU Age Verification Scheme. Article 29 would route covered account checks through certified third-party credentials on EU lists. Operating systems would share an already-obtained age signal with consent. Article 28 would require zero-knowledge proof and prohibit identification or tracking through age assurance. Article 8 would make child-protective design the default unless adulthood is established. Privacy protection and compulsory access sorting are being designed together. <a href=\"https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132530\">Proposal, Articles 5, 8 and 28–36</a></p>\n<p>The accompanying Communication extends the picture to AI companions, games and app stores: product-design obligations, regulated recommendations and app age ratings alongside the access rules. Enforcement builds on the DSA and AI Act. This combines public rulemaking with private implementation, assessment and distribution. <a href=\"https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132528\">Commission Communication, sections 2.2–2.4</a></p>\n<p>One revealing detail sits in the impact analysis. An additional rights-and-cost study was commissioned in August, with final publication expected in the fourth quarter. The document also sees wider e-government benefits from expanded digital-identity coverage. It cites earlier 5Rights and WeProtect material. Those are traceable inputs into the evidence base; authorship and influence on particular clauses need their own records. <a href=\"https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/132529\">Analysis of impacts, pp. 14, 49 and 75–76</a></p>\n<p>Our reading: the consequential change is a proposed division of labour. Government defines acceptable access and technical requirements; approved verification systems supply credentials; services apply them; auditors assess compliance; industry fees fund supervision. The next investigation should follow who wins those implementation roles and what decisions they can actually make. The specification, certification list, contracts and review procedures are where the institutional outline becomes an operating system.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19",
        "title": "Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator",
        "description": "UK contracts reveal government publication control, private commercialization rights and a paid contribution to AI threat models.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# Irregular: the contract behind the evaluator\n\n**Further findings:** [The full grant is reported paid, and a third contract commissions evaluation design](/research/irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19).\n\nIrregular is more than a name in the “rogue AI” stories. It is a business positioned where philanthropy, government research and frontier-lab security meet. We have now found a document that shows how part of that arrangement works: **a UK government contract that reserves publication decisions to the buyer while preserving the supplier’s ability to commercialize related work.**\n\n[Open the contract and funding map](/maps/irregular-government-contracts), [read Irregular’s profile](/entity/w47-irregular), or [revisit the incident evidence](/research/ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19).\n\n## Public money bought technical input\n\nThe legal bridge is explicit. Irregular’s [current copyright statement](https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1) identifies Pattern Labs Tech Inc. That is the supplier named in the UK records.\n\nDSIT’s [February 2024 award](https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024) buys cyber evaluation, safeguarding analysis and advisory work for AISI. It records one tender and says the services could only be supplied by Pattern Labs for technical reasons. The [April correction](https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024) raises the recorded value from £195,434 to **£293,151** and moves the end date to 25 April. Those are two notices for the same contract.\n\nA [second award](https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4), starting 17 September 2024, records **£459,875** for AI-specific attacks and safeguards research. It calls for a team working with AISI researchers every week. Its six-month initial term includes an optional three-month extension.\n\nThere is also a cash record: DSIT’s [April 2025 expenditure ledger](https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/69735d123f2908a34904059e/dsit-spending-over-25000-april-2025.csv) lists **£153,000 paid to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. on 4 April**, transaction 668259. The ledger does not identify which contract it belongs to. It cannot be added to the award values as another pot of money.\n\nThese purchases sit alongside the [previously documented $6.8 million Good Ventures grant and later $80 million venture announcement](/research/irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19). Philanthropic support, government procurement and venture investment are all present in this company’s history.\n\n## Who controls the work—and who gets to reuse it\n\nThe [redacted contract bundle](https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec) is the consequential find. Schedule 20 says the commissioned attacks will feed AISI’s evaluations and threat models. The buyer signs off the research and decides whether and how outputs are published. The supplier prepares public and unredacted versions.\n\nSpecial Term 1 preserves the supplier’s underlying intellectual property, know-how and improvements. It also permits the development and sale of evaluation products similar to, or based on, the delivered work. Government buys research; the supplier can build reusable commercial capability alongside it.\n\nThe detailed supplier tender is commercially redacted. Special Term 3 gives that tender precedence for deliverables. We can read the allocation of rights more clearly than the precise work finally promised.\n\nThis is a concrete exchange of capabilities: public money supports work feeding public risk assessment, the public buyer holds publication authority, and the private contractor retains a route to commercial reuse. The contract supplies the mechanism. Whether that reuse occurred in a particular later product requires its own record.\n\n## Early access is part of the business strategy\n\nDan Lahav explains the company’s approach directly in a [Sequoia interview](https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav). Working inside frontier labs lets Irregular encounter problems before other businesses do, then prepare solutions for those later customers. Irregular’s [privacy policy](https://www.irregular.com/privacy-policy) describes a subscription service receiving data through API calls.\n\nThat makes early access commercially valuable as well as scientifically useful. A supplier can learn what to measure, develop the testing tools, and prepare the services that customers will buy when those problems spread. Our inference is that this position can compound: more early work produces more specialized knowledge, which strengthens the case for hiring the same supplier again. The government’s technical-reasons justification makes supplier replaceability a particularly useful question to pursue.\n\n## The measurements depend on the setup\n\n[AISI’s joint study with Irregular](https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates) reports that larger evaluation budgets reveal cyber-task successes missed by shorter runs. It recommends reporting token, time and cost limits. The authors also say they cannot precisely separate the contribution of the model from its surrounding tools and workflow.\n\nIrregular’s [FrontierCyber design](https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber) makes another part explicit: starting access, tools, objectives and timing affect difficulty. The benchmark uses real systems, verifies successful outcomes, and separates partial progress from completion. Comparisons require the same benchmark snapshot and timing.\n\nIts [September self-modification experiment](https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems) gives an agent training tools, data, checkpoint access and a deployment path. The result is a narrow task improvement under deliberately favorable conditions. The paper does not measure how often uncontrolled self-improvement occurs, and explains that an API-based agent with external training permissions can do analogous work.\n\nThese details matter because a measured result may later become a threshold used to demand intervention. A score needs its operating conditions attached: what the agent could access, what resources it had, and what counted as success. Those choices are part of the machinery we are mapping.\n\n## The next records are now identifiable\n\nThe contract requires a buyer-approved security plan, incident handling and independent quality assurance. The useful next documents are that approved plan, acceptance and quality-assurance records, the withheld deliverables, and any later contract covering current work. A written release decision citing an Irregular result would show how technical evidence actually crossed into a decision about a model.\n\nThis agreement concerns a 2024–25 government engagement. It does not tell us the terms governing the separate 2026 laboratory incidents.\n\nThe financial question is similarly concrete: the Good Ventures grant agreement and expenditure reports could explain restrictions, reporting duties and commercial-use terms. That is the next useful step from “who funded them?” to “what did that funding oblige them to do?”\n",
        "html": "<p><strong>Further findings:</strong> <a href=\"/research/irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19\">The full grant is reported paid, and a third contract commissions evaluation design</a>.</p>\n<p>Irregular is more than a name in the “rogue AI” stories. It is a business positioned where philanthropy, government research and frontier-lab security meet. We have now found a document that shows how part of that arrangement works: <strong>a UK government contract that reserves publication decisions to the buyer while preserving the supplier’s ability to commercialize related work.</strong></p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/irregular-government-contracts\">Open the contract and funding map</a>, <a href=\"/entity/w47-irregular\">read Irregular’s profile</a>, or <a href=\"/research/ai-incidents-what-the-tests-actually-show-2026-09-19\">revisit the incident evidence</a>.</p>\n<h2>Public money bought technical input</h2>\n<p>The legal bridge is explicit. Irregular’s <a href=\"https://www.irregular.com/research/best-practices-for-evaluations-and-evaluation-suites-part-1\">current copyright statement</a> identifies Pattern Labs Tech Inc. That is the supplier named in the UK records.</p>\n<p>DSIT’s <a href=\"https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/004425-2024\">February 2024 award</a> buys cyber evaluation, safeguarding analysis and advisory work for AISI. It records one tender and says the services could only be supplied by Pattern Labs for technical reasons. The <a href=\"https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/011236-2024\">April correction</a> raises the recorded value from £195,434 to <strong>£293,151</strong> and moves the end date to 25 April. Those are two notices for the same contract.</p>\n<p>A <a href=\"https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b2becb03-aa75-4d07-9bf6-cc9a39f70db4\">second award</a>, starting 17 September 2024, records <strong>£459,875</strong> for AI-specific attacks and safeguards research. It calls for a team working with AISI researchers every week. Its six-month initial term includes an optional three-month extension.</p>\n<p>There is also a cash record: DSIT’s <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/csv-preview/69735d123f2908a34904059e/dsit-spending-over-25000-april-2025.csv\">April 2025 expenditure ledger</a> lists <strong>£153,000 paid to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. on 4 April</strong>, transaction 668259. The ledger does not identify which contract it belongs to. It cannot be added to the award values as another pot of money.</p>\n<p>These purchases sit alongside the <a href=\"/research/irregular-money-and-evaluators-2026-09-19\">previously documented $6.8 million Good Ventures grant and later $80 million venture announcement</a>. Philanthropic support, government procurement and venture investment are all present in this company’s history.</p>\n<h2>Who controls the work—and who gets to reuse it</h2>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/5581a48f-62d7-4fb7-af0a-6137fe38c3ec\">redacted contract bundle</a> is the consequential find. Schedule 20 says the commissioned attacks will feed AISI’s evaluations and threat models. The buyer signs off the research and decides whether and how outputs are published. The supplier prepares public and unredacted versions.</p>\n<p>Special Term 1 preserves the supplier’s underlying intellectual property, know-how and improvements. It also permits the development and sale of evaluation products similar to, or based on, the delivered work. Government buys research; the supplier can build reusable commercial capability alongside it.</p>\n<p>The detailed supplier tender is commercially redacted. Special Term 3 gives that tender precedence for deliverables. We can read the allocation of rights more clearly than the precise work finally promised.</p>\n<p>This is a concrete exchange of capabilities: public money supports work feeding public risk assessment, the public buyer holds publication authority, and the private contractor retains a route to commercial reuse. The contract supplies the mechanism. Whether that reuse occurred in a particular later product requires its own record.</p>\n<h2>Early access is part of the business strategy</h2>\n<p>Dan Lahav explains the company’s approach directly in a <a href=\"https://sequoiacap.com/podcast/securing-the-ai-frontier-irregular-co-founder-dan-lahav\">Sequoia interview</a>. Working inside frontier labs lets Irregular encounter problems before other businesses do, then prepare solutions for those later customers. Irregular’s <a href=\"https://www.irregular.com/privacy-policy\">privacy policy</a> describes a subscription service receiving data through API calls.</p>\n<p>That makes early access commercially valuable as well as scientifically useful. A supplier can learn what to measure, develop the testing tools, and prepare the services that customers will buy when those problems spread. Our inference is that this position can compound: more early work produces more specialized knowledge, which strengthens the case for hiring the same supplier again. The government’s technical-reasons justification makes supplier replaceability a particularly useful question to pursue.</p>\n<h2>The measurements depend on the setup</h2>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/evidence-for-inference-scaling-in-ai-cyber-tasks-increased-evaluation-budgets-reveal-higher-success-rates\">AISI’s joint study with Irregular</a> reports that larger evaluation budgets reveal cyber-task successes missed by shorter runs. It recommends reporting token, time and cost limits. The authors also say they cannot precisely separate the contribution of the model from its surrounding tools and workflow.</p>\n<p>Irregular’s <a href=\"https://www.irregular.com/research/frontiercyber\">FrontierCyber design</a> makes another part explicit: starting access, tools, objectives and timing affect difficulty. The benchmark uses real systems, verifies successful outcomes, and separates partial progress from completion. Comparisons require the same benchmark snapshot and timing.</p>\n<p>Its <a href=\"https://www.irregular.com/research/agentic-self-modification-in-open-weights-systems\">September self-modification experiment</a> gives an agent training tools, data, checkpoint access and a deployment path. The result is a narrow task improvement under deliberately favorable conditions. The paper does not measure how often uncontrolled self-improvement occurs, and explains that an API-based agent with external training permissions can do analogous work.</p>\n<p>These details matter because a measured result may later become a threshold used to demand intervention. A score needs its operating conditions attached: what the agent could access, what resources it had, and what counted as success. Those choices are part of the machinery we are mapping.</p>\n<h2>The next records are now identifiable</h2>\n<p>The contract requires a buyer-approved security plan, incident handling and independent quality assurance. The useful next documents are that approved plan, acceptance and quality-assurance records, the withheld deliverables, and any later contract covering current work. A written release decision citing an Irregular result would show how technical evidence actually crossed into a decision about a model.</p>\n<p>This agreement concerns a 2024–25 government engagement. It does not tell us the terms governing the separate 2026 laboratory incidents.</p>\n<p>The financial question is similarly concrete: the Good Ventures grant agreement and expenditure reports could explain restrictions, reporting duties and commercial-use terms. That is the next useful step from “who funded them?” to “what did that funding oblige them to do?”</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "irregular-grant-reports-and-test-design-2026-09-19",
        "title": "Irregular: paid to help design the tests",
        "description": "The full $6.8m grant is reported paid. A third UK contract buys evaluation design while preserving commercial reuse rights.",
        "date": "2026-09-19",
        "markdown": "# Irregular: paid to help design the tests\n\n**The money reached the company. And the government paid the company to help design its evaluations.** We have recovered Good Ventures’ filed payment and grant-oversight records for Pattern Labs, now Irregular, plus a third UK government contract. The new contract pays for work upstream of a score: choosing important capabilities, designing the evaluations and explaining why those tests cover the threat.\n\n[Explore the funding and contract map](/maps/irregular-government-contracts), [open Irregular’s profile](/entity/w47-irregular), or [read the earlier contract investigation](/research/irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19).\n\n## From grant announcement to reported payments\n\nGood Ventures’ [return for the year ending June 2024](https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full) lists **$4,533,333 paid** to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. and another **$2,266,667 approved for future payment**. Its [next return](https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full) records the second payment. The expenditure-responsibility statement supplies both dates: **5 March 2024 and 4 February 2025**. Together, they account for the previously announced **$6.8 million award**.\n\nThe later statement describes a grant for software tools, products and analysis concerning global security. It also records **$2,639,613 expended by the grantee**, a report dated **15 March 2025**, and no reported diversion of funds. Both returns repeat that expenditure figure and report date. They do not provide a current balance.\n\nThis gives us something much more useful than a grant listing: a named reporting relationship and a specific report to pursue. Under the [IRS expenditure-responsibility framework](https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/irc-section-4945h-expenditure-responsibility), the foundation is expected to obtain a written commitment to the grant’s purpose, annual spending and progress reports, and access to relevant records. The foundation must retain the agreement and reports. These are the framework’s requirements; the signed Pattern Labs agreement is still missing. Its particular intellectual-property and commercial-use conditions remain an open question.\n\n## £459,000 to help construct the measuring instrument\n\nThe newly recovered [award](https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3) is **Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research**, awarded to Pattern Labs on **17 September 2024**. Its value is **£459,000**. It is a separate contract from the similarly priced **£459,875 attacks-and-safeguards award** already in our map.\n\nIn the [contract bundle](https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95), Schedule 20 asks the supplier to research priority cyber capabilities, design evaluations and justify their coverage and robustness. It calls for a first outline of an ideal evaluation suite after two months, repeated feedback with DSIT, advice on running the tests and review of other DSIT evaluations and products. DSIT also promises access to its Inspect technical infrastructure.\n\n**That is participation in defining the yardstick.** Government researchers supply threat scenarios; the contractor helps work out what capabilities matter, how to test them and why the tests should count as adequate. Those choices shape what later results can tell a decision-maker.\n\nThe agreement places final output approval and publication decisions with the buyer. It requires independent quality assurance and access to the data underlying outputs for the buyer’s own checks. At the same time, Special Term 1 preserves the supplier’s underlying IP and know-how and permits related evaluation products to be developed and sold.\n\nThe exchange is concrete: the government purchases specialist methods and evidence; the supplier retains knowledge that can support a commercial business. Our inference is that this arrangement can strengthen a specialist’s position over time. Repeated access, testing experience and reusable tools can make it an increasingly attractive supplier of the next round of work.\n\n## A disclosed place in the framework discussion\n\nAn [October 2024 government disclosure](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks) also names **Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy** in its response about invitations to the closed Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference. It identifies **UK AISI and the Centre for the Governance of AI** as organizers and gives a capacity of 90. The [earlier response](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference) describes the primary audience as employees of labs making frontier-safety commitments, with relevant researchers also invited.\n\nThis documents an invitation context, rather than verified attendance. It is nevertheless another specific connection: the funded evaluator appears in the organizational list around a government-linked discussion of safety frameworks.\n\n## The remaining documents would settle different questions\n\nThe **15 March 2025 grantee report and the signed Good Ventures agreement** would show the reported work and the actual grant restrictions. They are the direct route to answering how philanthropic support interacted with commercial development.\n\nFor **contract 6492**, accepted deliverables, final sign-off, QA reports and supporting data would show what the government actually received and accepted. The detailed supplier tender is commercially redacted and has precedence for deliverables. The bundle references a security annex that is not included. Its notice and order form also differ on the end date, with the form including an optional extension. We have not established exercise of that option or a later instrument covering 2026 work.\n\nThese gaps define the next requests. They do not erase the mechanism already visible: **philanthropy financed technical capacity; government procured work on the measurement methods; the supplier retained a route to commercial reuse.** Influence here sits partly in the construction of the evidence on which later decisions may depend. The next test is whether we can follow a specific output all the way into an actual decision.\n",
        "html": "<p><strong>The money reached the company. And the government paid the company to help design its evaluations.</strong> We have recovered Good Ventures’ filed payment and grant-oversight records for Pattern Labs, now Irregular, plus a third UK government contract. The new contract pays for work upstream of a score: choosing important capabilities, designing the evaluations and explaining why those tests cover the threat.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/maps/irregular-government-contracts\">Explore the funding and contract map</a>, <a href=\"/entity/w47-irregular\">open Irregular’s profile</a>, or <a href=\"/research/irregular-government-contracts-and-commercial-rights-2026-09-19\">read the earlier contract investigation</a>.</p>\n<h2>From grant announcement to reported payments</h2>\n<p>Good Ventures’ <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202501349349105365/full\">return for the year ending June 2024</a> lists <strong>$4,533,333 paid</strong> to Pattern Labs Tech Inc. and another <strong>$2,266,667 approved for future payment</strong>. Its <a href=\"https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461008520/202641359349102829/full\">next return</a> records the second payment. The expenditure-responsibility statement supplies both dates: <strong>5 March 2024 and 4 February 2025</strong>. Together, they account for the previously announced <strong>$6.8 million award</strong>.</p>\n<p>The later statement describes a grant for software tools, products and analysis concerning global security. It also records <strong>$2,639,613 expended by the grantee</strong>, a report dated <strong>15 March 2025</strong>, and no reported diversion of funds. Both returns repeat that expenditure figure and report date. They do not provide a current balance.</p>\n<p>This gives us something much more useful than a grant listing: a named reporting relationship and a specific report to pursue. Under the <a href=\"https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/irc-section-4945h-expenditure-responsibility\">IRS expenditure-responsibility framework</a>, the foundation is expected to obtain a written commitment to the grant’s purpose, annual spending and progress reports, and access to relevant records. The foundation must retain the agreement and reports. These are the framework’s requirements; the signed Pattern Labs agreement is still missing. Its particular intellectual-property and commercial-use conditions remain an open question.</p>\n<h2>£459,000 to help construct the measuring instrument</h2>\n<p>The newly recovered <a href=\"https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/67da891e-4aa7-4d98-8714-9d7c823411f3\">award</a> is <strong>Accessible Cyber Attacks Evaluations and Research</strong>, awarded to Pattern Labs on <strong>17 September 2024</strong>. Its value is <strong>£459,000</strong>. It is a separate contract from the similarly priced <strong>£459,875 attacks-and-safeguards award</strong> already in our map.</p>\n<p>In the <a href=\"https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/917ff5d2-0a93-442d-b2ae-43b428052b95\">contract bundle</a>, Schedule 20 asks the supplier to research priority cyber capabilities, design evaluations and justify their coverage and robustness. It calls for a first outline of an ideal evaluation suite after two months, repeated feedback with DSIT, advice on running the tests and review of other DSIT evaluations and products. DSIT also promises access to its Inspect technical infrastructure.</p>\n<p><strong>That is participation in defining the yardstick.</strong> Government researchers supply threat scenarios; the contractor helps work out what capabilities matter, how to test them and why the tests should count as adequate. Those choices shape what later results can tell a decision-maker.</p>\n<p>The agreement places final output approval and publication decisions with the buyer. It requires independent quality assurance and access to the data underlying outputs for the buyer’s own checks. At the same time, Special Term 1 preserves the supplier’s underlying IP and know-how and permits related evaluation products to be developed and sold.</p>\n<p>The exchange is concrete: the government purchases specialist methods and evidence; the supplier retains knowledge that can support a commercial business. Our inference is that this arrangement can strengthen a specialist’s position over time. Repeated access, testing experience and reusable tools can make it an increasingly attractive supplier of the next round of work.</p>\n<h2>A disclosed place in the framework discussion</h2>\n<p>An <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00441-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks/response-participation-in-the-conference-on-frontier-ai-safety-frameworks\">October 2024 government disclosure</a> also names <strong>Pattern Labs and Open Philanthropy</strong> in its response about invitations to the closed Frontier AI Safety Frameworks conference. It identifies <strong>UK AISI and the Centre for the Governance of AI</strong> as organizers and gives a capacity of 90. The <a href=\"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/foi2024-00412-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference/response-frontier-ai-safety-framework-conference\">earlier response</a> describes the primary audience as employees of labs making frontier-safety commitments, with relevant researchers also invited.</p>\n<p>This documents an invitation context, rather than verified attendance. It is nevertheless another specific connection: the funded evaluator appears in the organizational list around a government-linked discussion of safety frameworks.</p>\n<h2>The remaining documents would settle different questions</h2>\n<p>The <strong>15 March 2025 grantee report and the signed Good Ventures agreement</strong> would show the reported work and the actual grant restrictions. They are the direct route to answering how philanthropic support interacted with commercial development.</p>\n<p>For <strong>contract 6492</strong>, accepted deliverables, final sign-off, QA reports and supporting data would show what the government actually received and accepted. The detailed supplier tender is commercially redacted and has precedence for deliverables. The bundle references a security annex that is not included. Its notice and order form also differ on the end date, with the form including an optional extension. We have not established exercise of that option or a later instrument covering 2026 work.</p>\n<p>These gaps define the next requests. They do not erase the mechanism already visible: <strong>philanthropy financed technical capacity; government procured work on the measurement methods; the supplier retained a route to commercial reuse.</strong> Influence here sits partly in the construction of the evidence on which later decisions may depend. The next test is whether we can follow a specific output all the way into an actual decision.</p>"
      },
      {
        "id": "w51-ofcom-collection-limits",
        "title": "Ofcom: a fine is not yet a collected penalty",
        "description": "Uncorrected testimony separates imposed fines, collection and business-disruption powers.",
        "markdown": "# Ofcom: a fine is not yet a collected penalty\n\nResearch checked 2026-09-20.\n\nOfcom's September 15 evidence describes an enforcement bottleneck. Suzanne Cater said most of about £7 million in penalties remained unpaid. She described services introducing age checks but not paying: in her account, compliance removed the ongoing breach needed for business-disruption applications. The transcript is [uncorrected oral evidence](https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/18091/html/), not a court ruling.\n\nThe witnesses sought targeted changes. Oliver Griffiths also said fines go to the Treasury, not Ofcom. The hearing does not confer the requested powers.\n\nOur reading: an obligation, a penalty and an effective consequence are different stages. Whether the problem calls for stronger powers, better collection or safeguards against overreach depends on the actual cases. Follow the promised collection figures, written evidence and any legislative response.\n\n[Ofcom's profile](/entity/ofcom) retains the earlier record alongside this dated update.\n",
        "html": "<h1>Ofcom: a fine is not yet a collected penalty</h1>\n<p>Research checked 2026-09-20.</p>\n<p>Ofcom's September 15 evidence describes an enforcement bottleneck. Suzanne Cater said most of about £7 million in penalties remained unpaid. She described services introducing age checks but not paying: in her account, compliance removed the ongoing breach needed for business-disruption applications. The transcript is <a href=\"https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/18091/html/\">uncorrected oral evidence</a>, not a court ruling.</p>\n<p>The witnesses sought targeted changes. Oliver Griffiths also said fines go to the Treasury, not Ofcom. The hearing does not confer the requested powers.</p>\n<p>Our reading: an obligation, a penalty and an effective consequence are different stages. Whether the problem calls for stronger powers, better collection or safeguards against overreach depends on the actual cases. Follow the promised collection figures, written evidence and any legislative response.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/entity/ofcom\">Ofcom's profile</a> retains the earlier record alongside this dated update.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w51-clarity-procedural-vote",
        "title": "CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate",
        "description": "The Senate rejected cloture on proceeding, not the bill on final passage; proposed powers remain proposed.",
        "markdown": "# CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate\n\nResearch checked 2026-09-20.\n\n[Senate roll call 234](https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm) records a September 15 vote of 49–50 rejecting cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633. It required three-fifths. This was not final passage.\n\nThe [floor record](https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm) records Thom Tillis entering reconsideration. Permanent defeat is therefore not established. Our [September 14 draft analysis](/research/w43-fin-clarity-remedies) describes proposed intervention and ethics provisions, not powers that came into force.\n\n[Tim Scott's response](https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote) calls for SEC and CFTC rulemaking while Congress remains unable to legislate. That is a declared alternative strategy; it neither expands agency authority nor proves adoption of a rule.\n\nThe next test is reconsideration or revised legislation, followed separately by actual agency proposals and their claimed statutory basis. Political sponsorship did not supply the votes needed at this stage.\n\nSee the [CLARITY draft](/entity/w43-fin-clarity), [proposed Treasury role](/entity/w43-fin-treasury-role) and [state ethics route](/entity/w43-fin-state-ethics-route).\n",
        "html": "<h1>CLARITY stalls at a procedural gate</h1>\n<p>Research checked 2026-09-20.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00234.htm\">Senate roll call 234</a> records a September 15 vote of 49–50 rejecting cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633. It required three-fifths. This was not final passage.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/floor_activity/09_15_2026_Senate_Floor.htm\">floor record</a> records Thom Tillis entering reconsideration. Permanent defeat is therefore not established. Our <a href=\"/research/w43-fin-clarity-remedies\">September 14 draft analysis</a> describes proposed intervention and ethics provisions, not powers that came into force.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/scott-statement-on-clarity-act-vote\">Tim Scott's response</a> calls for SEC and CFTC rulemaking while Congress remains unable to legislate. That is a declared alternative strategy; it neither expands agency authority nor proves adoption of a rule.</p>\n<p>The next test is reconsideration or revised legislation, followed separately by actual agency proposals and their claimed statutory basis. Political sponsorship did not supply the votes needed at this stage.</p>\n<p>See the <a href=\"/entity/w43-fin-clarity\">CLARITY draft</a>, <a href=\"/entity/w43-fin-treasury-role\">proposed Treasury role</a> and <a href=\"/entity/w43-fin-state-ethics-route\">state ethics route</a>.</p>\n"
      },
      {
        "id": "w51-pdc-capital-process",
        "title": "UK PDC opens its capital process—not its final ownership register",
        "description": "A launched process names the intermediary and participation rules; paid capital and shareholder powers remain unverified.",
        "markdown": "# UK PDC opens its capital process—not its final ownership register\n\nResearch checked 2026-09-20.\n\n[UK Finance's September 15 announcement](https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/uk-payments-delivery-company-launches-equity-capital-raise) confirms an equity-capital process for UK Payments Delivery Company. It names EY as administrator of nonbinding expressions of interest. Participation and access to information are not guaranteed; expressions of interest may be rejected without reasons.\n\nThis advances the [earlier reported financing plan](/research/w44-fin-note-pdc) to an announced launch. It does not establish subscribed capital or shareholder decision rights.\n\nAn entry process is now visible. Whether it produces concentrated control depends on the eventual investors and their rights, not the presence of eligibility conditions alone. Ordinary management of professional-investor fundraising remains a straightforward explanation.\n\nThe decisive records are definitive subscription terms, ownership and voting arrangements, and procurement rules. EY's administrative role does not establish that it independently selects the owners or controls the company. See [UK PDC](/entity/w44-fin-pdc).\n",
        "html": "<h1>UK PDC opens its capital process—not its final ownership register</h1>\n<p>Research checked 2026-09-20.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/news-and-insight/press-release/uk-payments-delivery-company-launches-equity-capital-raise\">UK Finance's September 15 announcement</a> confirms an equity-capital process for UK Payments Delivery Company. It names EY as administrator of nonbinding expressions of interest. Participation and access to information are not guaranteed; expressions of interest may be rejected without reasons.</p>\n<p>This advances the <a href=\"/research/w44-fin-note-pdc\">earlier reported financing plan</a> to an announced launch. It does not establish subscribed capital or shareholder decision rights.</p>\n<p>An entry process is now visible. Whether it produces concentrated control depends on the eventual investors and their rights, not the presence of eligibility conditions alone. Ordinary management of professional-investor fundraising remains a straightforward explanation.</p>\n<p>The decisive records are definitive subscription terms, ownership and voting arrangements, and procurement rules. EY's administrative role does not establish that it independently selects the owners or controls the company. See <a href=\"/entity/w44-fin-pdc\">UK PDC</a>.</p>\n"
      }
    ],
    "waveMaps": [
      {
        "id": "sanders-ai",
        "title": "Sanders: from AI advocacy to proposed federal power",
        "description": "Follow consultation, legislative sponsorship, campaign infrastructure and open opposition. Select a person or organization for its role and the supporting records.",
        "boundary": "The regulatory powers are proposed. ControlAI’s consultation is self-reported; the legal entity and any fee are unidentified. A principal campaign committee is not evidence of an AI-safety donation. Endorsements of earlier bills remain separate.",
        "topic": "AI policy & political power",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "Says it consulted",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-friends-of-bernie-sanders",
            "title": "Friends of Bernie Sanders",
            "sub": "Principal campaign committee",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-cpc",
            "title": "Progressive Caucus",
            "sub": "Casar chair; Sanders member",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-bernie",
            "title": "Bernie Sanders",
            "sub": "Senate legislative route",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-casar",
            "title": "Greg Casar",
            "sub": "House legislative route",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "cdi",
            "title": "ITIF",
            "sub": "Publicly opposes the ban",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-asi-act",
            "title": "Proposed ASI ban",
            "sub": "Announced; full bill not recovered",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
            "title": "Civic Shout petition",
            "sub": "Solicits congressional support",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-proposed-regulator",
            "title": "Proposed AI regulator",
            "sub": "Monitoring and enforcement",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
            "title": "Civic Shout",
            "sub": "Hosts petition; offers ad credits",
            "pos": [
              3,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w34-sanders-adv-e-001",
          "w34-sanders-fin-e-principal-committee",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-01",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-02",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-03",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-04",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-05",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-06",
          "w34-sanders-coal-e-07",
          "w34-sanders-root-e-agency"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "miri-money",
        "title": "MIRI: money and institutional responsibility",
        "description": "Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.",
        "boundary": "Cumulative acknowledged support includes matching credit. Donor support is not a current campaign allocation or personal income. The anonymous 2021 gift is separately dated.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "$15.93m cumulative credit",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "vitalik",
            "title": "Vitalik Buterin",
            "sub": "$5.41m cumulative credit",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sff",
            "title": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "sub": "$3.37m cumulative credit",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miri",
            "title": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "sub": "Recipient institution",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miri-anonymous-2021-donor",
            "title": "Anonymous 2021 MIRI cryptocurrency donor",
            "sub": "$15.59m reported proceeds",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "yudkowsky",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "sub": "Co-founder; leadership; board",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "malo-bourgon",
            "title": "Malo Bourgon",
            "sub": "CEO",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "nate-soares",
            "title": "Nate Soares",
            "sub": "President",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w35-e-y-r-donor-openphil",
          "w35-e-y-r-donor-vitalik",
          "w35-e-y-r-donor-sff",
          "w35-e-y-r-anon-gift",
          "w35-e-y-r-founder",
          "w35-e-y-r-ceo",
          "w35-e-y-r-president"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "yudkowsky-persuasion",
        "title": "Yudkowsky: writing, audiences and political access",
        "description": "Follow adaptations, book promotion and the documented Sanders briefing.",
        "boundary": "Adaptation, recommendation, sponsorship and access are different relationships. There is no inferred bill-authorship or command edge.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "yudkowsky",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "sub": "Author and MIRI co-founder",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "nate-soares",
            "title": "Nate Soares",
            "sub": "Coauthor; MIRI president",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "if-anyone-builds-it",
            "title": "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies",
            "sub": "Their coauthored book",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rational",
            "title": "Rational Animations",
            "sub": "Adapted explanations",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "Book promotion; sponsorship",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-bernie",
            "title": "Bernie Sanders",
            "sub": "March briefing",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w35-e-y-r-book-yud",
          "w35-e-y-r-book-nate",
          "w35-e-y-r-promotes",
          "w35-e-ra-adapts",
          "w35-e-ca-ra",
          "w35-e-y-r-sanders-yud",
          "w35-e-y-r-sanders-nate"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "controlai-sabine",
        "title": "The Sabine approach: sponsor, account and campaign",
        "description": "ControlAI identifies itself; the two accounts dispute editorial demands.",
        "boundary": "The offer is not recorded as a completed sponsorship. ControlAI’s response is self-reported, and the emails have not been published.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "winga",
            "title": "Max Winga",
            "sub": "Outreach lead; coauthor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miotti",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti",
            "sub": "Coauthor of response",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai-creator-outreach",
            "title": "ControlAI creator-outreach programme",
            "sub": "Creator programme",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "Self-identifies behind approach",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sabine-hossenfelder",
            "title": "Sabine Hossenfelder",
            "sub": "Described rejecting offer",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rational",
            "title": "Rational Animations",
            "sub": "Named sponsored partner",
            "pos": [
              3,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w35-e-winga-outreach",
          "w35-e-miotti-outreach",
          "w35-e-ca-program",
          "w35-e-ca-sabine",
          "w35-e-ca-ra"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "rohan-paul-publishing",
        "title": "Rohan Paul: sponsorship and distribution",
        "description": "Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.",
        "boundary": "No ControlAI/FLI commission was established. A quoted warning, a recommended post and a sponsorship are different relationships.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w35-pika",
            "title": "Pika",
            "sub": "Named edition sponsor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w35-toyo",
            "title": "Toyo",
            "sub": "Named edition sponsor",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rohans-bytes",
            "title": "Rohan’s Bytes",
            "sub": "Publication",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rohan-paul",
            "title": "Rohan Paul",
            "sub": "Writer and distributor",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "jacob-coxon",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon",
            "sub": "Warning circulated",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Assessment circulated",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "david-sacks",
            "title": "David Sacks",
            "sub": "Post recommended",
            "pos": [
              3,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w35-e-r-rel-founder",
          "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-pika",
          "w35-e-r-rel-sponsor-toyo",
          "w35-e-r-rel-coxon-wsj",
          "w35-e-r-rel-anthropic",
          "w35-e-r-rel-sacks"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "tallinn-funding",
        "title": "Tallinn: funding routes and decision rights",
        "description": "Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.",
        "boundary": "Amounts cover different periods. Donor support, investment and decision authority are separate relationships.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "Donor, investor and board member",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-slimrock",
            "title": "Slimrock (Tallinn ledger vehicle)",
            "sub": "Ledger vehicle",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sfr",
            "title": "Secure Future Research",
            "sub": "£2.5m reported in 2023–2024",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "Current company and campaign name",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sff",
            "title": "Survival and Flourishing Fund",
            "sub": "Allocation procedure",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-sfc",
            "title": "Survival and Flourishing Corp.",
            "sub": "Separate facilitation business",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-aipi",
            "title": "AI Policy Institute",
            "sub": "$442k associated entries, 2024",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "caisaction",
            "title": "CAIS Action Fund",
            "sub": "$3.221m entries, 2023–2024",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w36-e-vehicle",
          "w36-e-control-2023",
          "w36-e-control-2024",
          "w36-e-legal",
          "w36-e-allocation",
          "w36-e-sfc-client",
          "w36-e-sfc-sff",
          "w36-e-aipi",
          "w36-e-caisaction"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "tallinn-media-funding",
        "title": "How pooled funding reaches media",
        "description": "A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.",
        "boundary": "A pooled fund’s downstream grant cannot be allocated to one donor without another record. Frame asserts editorial independence.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "$786,994 designated contribution",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-vanguard",
            "title": "Vanguard Charitable",
            "sub": "Named charitable payee",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-jueyan",
            "title": "JueYan Zhang",
            "sub": "Fund manager",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w1-creator-aitof",
            "title": "AI Safety Tactical Opportunities Fund",
            "sub": "Pooled AI-safety fund",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "frame",
            "title": "Frame Fellowship",
            "sub": "Names fund as lead supporter",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-documentary",
            "title": "SB-1047 documentary project",
            "sub": "$41,162 recorded grant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-trazzi",
            "title": "Michaël Trazzi",
            "sub": "Documentary creator",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-tarbell",
            "title": "Tarbell Fellowship",
            "sub": "$520k separate programme support",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w36-e-aitof",
          "w36-e-vanguard",
          "w36-e-manager",
          "w36-e-frame",
          "w36-e-film",
          "w36-e-director",
          "w36-e-tarbell"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "policy-and-public-pressure",
        "title": "Policy drafting and organized public pressure",
        "description": "Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.",
        "boundary": "Outside input is not enacted law. The roadmap is conditional; declared counterparts do not establish command.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "Historical financial support",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-cltr",
            "title": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "sub": "Policy research and drafting",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-pause-global",
            "title": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "sub": "Public-pressure organization",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-guide",
            "title": "UK frontier-AI safety guide (October 2023)",
            "sub": "Nonmandatory UK guide",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w15-impl-dsit",
            "title": "UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology",
            "sub": "Government publisher",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "Named policy counterpart",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "fli",
            "title": "Future of Life Institute",
            "sub": "Named policy counterpart",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miri",
            "title": "Machine Intelligence Research Institute",
            "sub": "Named policy counterpart",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-microgrants",
            "title": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "sub": "Specified outputs and approval roles",
            "pos": [
              3,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-roadmap",
            "title": "PauseAI expansion roadmap",
            "sub": "Conditional expansion plans",
            "pos": [
              2,
              5,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w36-e-cltr",
          "w36-e-pauseglobal",
          "w36-e-draft",
          "w36-e-publish",
          "w36-e-pa-control",
          "w36-e-pa-fli",
          "w36-e-pa-miri",
          "w36-e-micro",
          "w36-e-roadmap"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "lightcone-finance",
        "title": "Lightcone: loans and future-donation offsets",
        "description": "Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.",
        "boundary": "Lightcone Infrastructure is distinct from Lightcone Foundation. Borrower reports establish the stated arrangements; legal instruments and current balances remain open.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "Donor and reported lender owner",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-slimrock-sg",
            "title": "Slimrock Investments Pte. Ltd.",
            "sub": "Reported property lender",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "lightcone-infrastructure",
            "title": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "sub": "Infrastructure operator and borrower",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w36-e-sgowner",
          "w36-e-loan",
          "w36-e-advance"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "civic-shout-business",
        "title": "Civic Shout: the business of advocacy",
        "description": "Civic Shout sells supporters and traffic, recruits coalition participants and rewards distribution through distinct credit and cash programs. A public filing identifies a political purchaser; a charitable project offers another route into audience-building.",
        "boundary": "Published offers are not realized spending. Selected FEC purchases do not establish AI-campaign allocation. Fiscal sponsorship is not company ownership. Civic Shout, Action Collective and Collective Shout are distinct names; no Civic–Collective affiliation is established.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-civicshout",
            "title": "Civic Shout",
            "sub": "Ad platform and campaign gatekeeper",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-bluevote-org",
            "title": "BLUEVOTE.ORG",
            "sub": "Reported2025 service purchases",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-players-philanthropy-fund",
            "title": "Players Philanthropy Fund",
            "sub": "Disclosed fiscal sponsor",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-civic-shout-foundation",
            "title": "The Civic Shout Foundation",
            "sub": "Donor-supported audience growth",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-josh-nelson",
            "title": "Josh Nelson",
            "sub": "CEO and Foundation participant",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-elliott-golden",
            "title": "Elliott Golden",
            "sub": "Historical product cofounder",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-marie-bergen",
            "title": "Marie Bergen",
            "sub": "Joint Action lead",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-joint-actions",
            "title": "Civic Shout Joint Actions",
            "sub": "Restricted noncash credits",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-affiliate-program",
            "title": "Civic Shout affiliate program",
            "sub": "Separate revenue-share program",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-civic-petition",
            "title": "Civic Shout petition for the ASI ban",
            "sub": "ASI-ban recruitment campaign",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-civic-action-collective",
            "title": "Action Collective",
            "sub": "Listed campaign participant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w37-civic-e-bluevote-payments",
          "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-operated",
          "w37-civic-e-joint-action-ai-offer",
          "w37-civic-e-affiliate-operated",
          "w37-civic-e-ceo",
          "w37-civic-e-cofounder",
          "w37-civic-e-joint-actions-lead",
          "w37-civic-e-foundation-operated",
          "w37-civic-e-foundation-sponsored",
          "w37-civic-e-nelson-foundation",
          "w37-civic-e-golden-foundation",
          "w37-civic-e-action-collective-participant"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "andreessen-capital-and-policy",
        "title": "Andreessen: capital and policy",
        "description": "Follow Andreessen's personal political receipt, a16z's investment and advocacy routes, and Meta's documented corporate oversight role.",
        "boundary": "Personal gifts, firm contributions, investment, policy advocacy and corporate authority are different relationships. Round and fund headlines are not individual checks. Shared markets do not establish unified control.",
        "topic": "AI, capital & policy",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-andreessen",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen",
            "sub": "Personal giving and corporate oversight",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-right-for-america",
            "title": "Right for America",
            "sub": "$2.5m personal receipt, July 2024",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "meta",
            "title": "Meta",
            "sub": "Board and committee responsibilities",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "a16z",
            "title": "a16z Capital Management",
            "sub": "Investment and policy institution",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-fairshake-network",
            "title": "Fairshake and affiliated PACs",
            "sub": "Firm disclosures; no personal double count",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-ostp",
            "title": "White House Office of Science and Technology Policy",
            "sub": "March 2025 policy submission",
            "pos": [
              4,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-anduril",
            "title": "Anduril Industries",
            "sub": "2021 financing; later AI partnership",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
            "title": "OpenAI",
            "sub": "a16z named financing co-lead",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "microsoft",
            "title": "Microsoft",
            "sub": "Joint AI policy statement",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-ndaa-procurement",
            "title": "NDAA procurement reform advocacy",
            "sub": "Acquisition rules as policy target",
            "pos": [
              4,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-founders-fund",
            "title": "Founders Fund",
            "sub": "Anduril co-investor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-volta",
            "title": "Volta",
            "sub": "Compute access and project finance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-machine-age-fund",
            "title": "a16z Machine Age Fund",
            "sub": "Physical AI fundraise",
            "pos": [
              3,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w37-marc-e-role",
          "w37-marc-e-meta",
          "w37-marc-e-rfa",
          "w37-marc-e-fairshake47",
          "w37-marc-e-fairshake26",
          "w37-marc-e-machine",
          "w37-marc-e-volta",
          "w37-marc-e-openai",
          "w37-marc-e-anduril",
          "w37-marc-e-founders-anduril",
          "w37-marc-e-anduril-openai",
          "w37-marc-e-ostp",
          "w37-marc-e-msft-policy",
          "w37-marc-e-defense"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "palantir-contracts-and-control",
        "title": "Palantir: contracts and control",
        "description": "Founder votes, purchasing power and AI distribution create different forms of authority around Karp's company.",
        "boundary": "Contract ceilings are not spending. Partnerships are not ownership. Collective founder votes are not Karp's unilateral control; court relief preserves lawful government supplier choice.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-alex",
            "title": "Alex Karp",
            "sub": "CEO / personal donor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-thiel",
            "title": "Peter Thiel",
            "sub": "Chairman",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-cohen",
            "title": "Stephen Cohen",
            "sub": "President",
            "pos": [
              3,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-trust",
            "title": "Palantir Founder Voting Trust",
            "sub": "Two matching instructions",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-palantir",
            "title": "Palantir Technologies Inc.",
            "sub": "Integration and procurement",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-army",
            "title": "U.S. Army",
            "sub": "Buyer / orders",
            "pos": [
              3,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Model supplier",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-aws",
            "title": "Amazon Web Services",
            "sub": "Cloud infrastructure",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "microsoft",
            "title": "Microsoft",
            "sub": "Azure OpenAI route",
            "pos": [
              3,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
            "title": "OpenAI",
            "sub": "Models via Microsoft",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-anduril",
            "title": "Anduril Industries",
            "sub": "Production / integration",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-court",
            "title": "Anthropic v DoW: August 2026 final relief",
            "sub": "August 2026 final order",
            "pos": [
              3,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-dow",
            "title": "U.S. Department of War / Defense",
            "sub": "Lawful supplier choice",
            "pos": [
              1,
              5,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-karp-inaugural",
            "title": "Trump Vance Inaugural Committee, Inc.",
            "sub": "Personal $1m receipt",
            "pos": [
              2,
              5,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w37-karp-e-instruction-alex",
          "w37-karp-e-instruction-thiel",
          "w37-karp-e-instruction-cohen",
          "w37-karp-e-votes",
          "w37-karp-e-army-ea",
          "w37-karp-e-titan-p",
          "w37-karp-e-titan-a",
          "w37-karp-e-ms",
          "w37-karp-e-openai",
          "w37-karp-e-claude",
          "w37-karp-e-aws",
          "w37-karp-e-anduril",
          "w37-karp-e-inaugural",
          "w37-karp-e-court-relief",
          "w37-karp-e-court-choice",
          "w37-karp-e-claude-boundary"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "policy-funding-and-conditions",
        "title": "Funding policy work and organizing",
        "description": "Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.",
        "boundary": "Commitments are not receipts. Proposed public offices are not operating authorities. Similar mechanisms do not prove a shared chain of command.",
        "topic": "AI, money & persuasion",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "Reported commitment",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-cltr",
            "title": "Centre for Long-Term Resilience",
            "sub": "Policy drafting and advocacy",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-policy-public-first-uk",
            "title": "Public First (UK consultancy)",
            "sub": "Commissioned pollster",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-policy-cltr-architecture",
            "title": "CLTR proposed AI governance architecture",
            "sub": "Proposed public institutions",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-pause-global",
            "title": "PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI",
            "sub": "Campaign organization",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w37-policy-stipends",
            "title": "PauseAI volunteer stipend programme",
            "sub": "Continuing support conditions",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w36-microgrants",
            "title": "PauseAI microgrant programme",
            "sub": "Delivery and future eligibility",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w37-policy-e-cltr-commitment",
          "w37-policy-e-cltr-poll",
          "w37-policy-e-cltr-proposal",
          "w37-policy-e-stipend-operation",
          "w37-policy-e-micro-renewal"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "controlai-us-lobbying",
        "title": "ControlAI’s US lobbying operation",
        "description": "Reported spending, professional roles and the UK-US disclosure link show the machinery behind congressional advocacy.",
        "boundary": "Dates and stages belong to each relationship. Open a connection for the supporting record.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "controlaius",
            "title": "Control AI US Inc",
            "sub": "Organisation",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-controlai-q1",
            "title": "Control AI US Q1 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "sub": "Quarterly expense disclosure",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-controlai-q2",
            "title": "Control AI US Q2 2026 lobbying expenses",
            "sub": "Quarterly expense disclosure",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-max-hz",
            "title": "Max Hernandez-Zapata",
            "sub": "Lobbyist with disclosed congressional staff experience",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "leahy",
            "title": "Connor Leahy",
            "sub": "Person",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-nathan-morrison",
            "title": "Nathan Morrison",
            "sub": "Registered advocacy consultant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "sfr",
            "title": "Secure Future Research",
            "sub": "UK legal entity behind ControlAI",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-us-congress",
            "title": "US Congress — reported lobbying audience",
            "sub": "Federal legislative audience",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w38-e-q1-expenses",
          "w38-e-q2-expenses",
          "w38-e-congress-lobbying",
          "w38-e-max-lobbyist",
          "w38-e-leahy-lobbyist",
          "w38-e-morrison-client",
          "w38-e-sfr-foreign-interest"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "california-ai-auditor-laws",
        "title": "California: who qualifies the AI auditors?",
        "description": "California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from January2029, restricts who may sell covered audits. They establish standards for the assessors; SB813 expressly preserves operation without purchasing this verification service.",
        "boundary": "Dates and stages belong to each relationship. Open a connection for the supporting record.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w9-assure-sb813",
            "title": "California SB813 — enacted September 2026",
            "sub": "Legislation",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w9-assure-govops",
            "title": "California Government Operations Agency",
            "sub": "Public authority",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w9-assure-ivo-role",
            "title": "SB813 independent-verifier role",
            "sub": "Proposed role",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w9-assure-assessed-role",
            "title": "SB813 assessed developer/deployer/operator",
            "sub": "Decision-making role",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-ab1405",
            "title": "California AB1405 — AI auditor registration",
            "sub": "Enacted market-entry rules for AI auditors",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-ai-auditor-registry",
            "title": "California AI Auditor Registry — scheduled",
            "sub": "Future registration and complaint infrastructure",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w38-ca-accountancy",
            "title": "California Board of Accountancy",
            "sub": "Professional oversight and complaint investigations",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
            "title": "OpenAI",
            "sub": "Industry actor facing congressional oversight",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w9-assure-e-sb813-govops",
          "w9-assure-e-sb813-voluntary",
          "w9-assure-e-sb813-permitted-fees",
          "w38-e-ab-registry",
          "w38-e-govops-registry",
          "w38-e-accountancy-route",
          "w38-e-openai-sb",
          "w38-e-openai-ab",
          "w9-assure-e-govops-ivo"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "basi-funding-and-access",
        "title": "BASI: money, research and lab access",
        "description": "Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.",
        "boundary": "Dates and stages belong to each relationship. Open a connection for the supporting record.",
        "topic": "AI research & security",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w37-marc-andreessen",
            "title": "Marc Andreessen",
            "sub": "Investor, director and public advocate",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "a16z",
            "title": "Andreessen Horowitz / a16z",
            "sub": "Capital supporting independent AI research",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-pliny",
            "title": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "sub": "Researcher linking public experimentation, funding and lab testing",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
            "title": "OpenAI",
            "sub": "Industry actor facing congressional oversight",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-lysios",
            "title": "Lysios — AI research organization",
            "sub": "External research and evaluation participant",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-john-v",
            "title": "John V",
            "sub": "Personnel bridge between collective and research organization",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-bt6",
            "title": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "sub": "Organized research collective",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-basi",
            "title": "BASI community",
            "sub": "Community and knowledge exchange",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w37-marc-e-role",
          "w39-e-grant",
          "w39-e-reported-personal-grant",
          "w39-e-reported-contracts",
          "w39-e-pliny-bt6",
          "w39-e-john-bt6",
          "w39-e-pliny-community",
          "w39-e-john-lysios",
          "w39-e-operator-credit",
          "w39-e-deep-credit"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "bt6-public-research",
        "title": "BT6: people, projects and professional work",
        "description": "The collective’s public roster connects to tools, publications, a bug-bounty program and a vendor challenge.",
        "boundary": "Dates and stages belong to each relationship. Open a connection for the supporting record.",
        "topic": "AI research & security",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w39-bt6",
            "title": "BT6 / BASI Team Six",
            "sub": "Organized research collective",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-pliny",
            "title": "Pliny the Liberator",
            "sub": "Researcher linking public experimentation, funding and lab testing",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-john-v",
            "title": "John V",
            "sub": "Personnel bridge between collective and research organization",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-philip-dursey",
            "title": "Philip A. Dursey",
            "sub": "Security practitioner, author and company founder",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-hypergame",
            "title": "HYPERGAME",
            "sub": "Commercial security tooling",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-red-teaming-ai",
            "title": "Red Teaming AI — Philip A. Dursey",
            "sub": "Published security knowledge",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-marco-figueroa",
            "title": "Marco Figueroa",
            "sub": "Bug-bounty programs and collaborative research",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-0din",
            "title": "0DIN",
            "sub": "Vulnerability research and disclosure venue",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-basilisk-venom",
            "title": "Basilisk Venom research report",
            "sub": "Published technical claim",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-joey-melo",
            "title": "Joey Melo",
            "sub": "Practitioner connecting collective and commercial testing",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-pangea",
            "title": "Pangea",
            "sub": "Vendor-sponsored security competition",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-sans",
            "title": "SANS Institute",
            "sub": "Professional training and conference access",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-libertas",
            "title": "L1B3RT4S / Libertas",
            "sub": "Public distribution of research methods",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w39-claritas",
            "title": "CL4R1T4S / Claritas",
            "sub": "Public access to model-behavior documentation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w39-e-pliny-bt6",
          "w39-e-john-bt6",
          "w39-e-w39-philip-dursey-roster",
          "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-roster",
          "w39-e-w39-joey-melo-roster",
          "w39-e-dursey-hypergame",
          "w39-e-dursey-book",
          "w39-e-marco-0din",
          "w39-e-w39-pliny-venom",
          "w39-e-w39-marco-figueroa-venom",
          "w39-e-0din-venom",
          "w39-e-pangea-winner",
          "w39-e-sans-speaker",
          "w39-e-w39-libertas-publisher",
          "w39-e-w39-claritas-publisher"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-public-ownership",
        "title": "AI ownership and board power — proposals",
        "description": "Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.",
        "boundary": "All institutional changes shown here are proposals. June document dates are not enactment or implementation dates.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w40-elsayed",
            "title": "Abdul El-Sayed",
            "sub": "Campaigner for public control of AI governance",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w40-ai-under-democracy",
            "title": "AI Under Democracy — El-Sayed platform",
            "sub": "Proposed corporate-governance and testing rules",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w40-public-board-majority",
            "title": "Majority public AI board seats — proposed",
            "sub": "Proposed transfer of board selection rights",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w40-testing-agency",
            "title": "Independent AI safety testing agency — El-Sayed proposal",
            "sub": "Proposed evaluation institution",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-bernie",
            "title": "Bernie Sanders",
            "sub": "Legislative sponsor connecting risk advocacy with federal power",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w40-ai-wealth-act",
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — proposal",
            "sub": "Proposed equity transfer and public governance",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w40-ai-public-fund",
            "title": "American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund — proposed",
            "sub": "Proposed public ownership institution",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w40-democratic-ai-commission",
            "title": "Independent Commission for Democratic AI — proposed",
            "sub": "Proposed fund manager and shareholder decision-maker",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w40-e-launch",
          "w40-e-board-proposal",
          "w40-e-testing-proposal",
          "w40-e-supports-wealth",
          "w40-e-announces-wealth",
          "w40-e-establish-fund",
          "w40-e-establish-commission",
          "w40-e-manage-vote",
          "w40-e-fund-operations"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ai-evaluator-network",
        "title": "METR: funding, access and policy",
        "description": "Follow grants, lab access, people and public-sector work around the evaluator.",
        "boundary": "Each verb identifies a different relationship: support, access, affiliation or proposed rules.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-metr",
            "title": "METR",
            "sub": "Technical assessment as input to public debate",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-cotra",
            "title": "Ajeya Cotra",
            "sub": "Research findings entering the political case for restriction",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "Philanthropic adviser",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-benton",
            "title": "Joe Benton",
            "sub": "Professional bridge",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Organisation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-uk-aisi",
            "title": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "sub": "Public research and evaluation",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-arc",
            "title": "Alignment Research Center (ARC)",
            "sub": "Historical incubator",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-audacious",
            "title": "The Audacious Project",
            "sub": "Funding convenor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-canary",
            "title": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "sub": "Evaluation collaboration",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-rand",
            "title": "RAND Corporation",
            "sub": "Policy research and evaluation",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-gates",
            "title": "Gates Foundation",
            "sub": "Funder and institutional convenor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-commitments",
            "title": "METR’s August 2026 funding commitments",
            "sub": "Aggregate funding announcement",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w9-assure-schmidt-sciences",
            "title": "Schmidt Sciences",
            "sub": "Organisation",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w27-roost-packard",
            "title": "David and Lucile Packard Foundation",
            "sub": "Organisation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "longview",
            "title": "Longview Philanthropy",
            "sub": "Organisation",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-eu-ai-office",
            "title": "European AI Office",
            "sub": "Technical-assistance customer",
            "pos": [
              0,
              5,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-rsp",
            "title": "Responsible Scaling Policies — framework",
            "sub": "Evaluation-based scaling conditions",
            "pos": [
              1,
              5,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-open-evaluations",
            "title": "RAND proportional open-weight evaluation proposal",
            "sub": "Proposed evaluation practice",
            "pos": [
              2,
              5,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w41-e-cotra-coefficient",
          "w41-e-benton-anthropic",
          "w41-e-benton-metr",
          "w41-e-benton-uk",
          "w41-e-arc-spinoff",
          "w41-e-audacious-canary",
          "w41-e-canary-metr",
          "w41-e-rand-canary",
          "w41-e-gates-audacious",
          "w41-e-commitments",
          "w41-e-schmidt",
          "w41-e-packard",
          "w41-e-longview",
          "w41-e-uk-support",
          "w41-e-eu-contract",
          "w41-e-lab-access",
          "w41-e-rsp-origin",
          "w41-e-rand-open",
          "w34-sanders-adv-e-014"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "gates-anthropic-infrastructure",
        "title": "Gates, Anthropic and public-service AI",
        "description": "Follow the joint programme and its institutional connections.",
        "boundary": "Each verb identifies a different relationship: support, access, affiliation or proposed rules.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w41-gates",
            "title": "Gates Foundation",
            "sub": "Funder and institutional convenor",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-audacious",
            "title": "The Audacious Project",
            "sub": "Funding convenor",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-canary",
            "title": "Canary — RAND–METR collaboration",
            "sub": "Evaluation collaboration",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-metr",
            "title": "METR",
            "sub": "Technical assessment as input to public debate",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Organisation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-gates-anthropic",
            "title": "Gates–Anthropic public-benefit AI partnership",
            "sub": "Deployment and infrastructure",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-idm",
            "title": "Institute for Disease Modeling",
            "sub": "Disease modelling",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-ihme",
            "title": "Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation",
            "sub": "Public-health data research",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w41-e-gates-partner",
          "w41-e-anthropic-partner",
          "w41-e-idm-internal",
          "w41-e-idm-integration",
          "w41-e-ihme-integration",
          "w41-e-gates-audacious",
          "w41-e-audacious-canary",
          "w41-e-canary-metr",
          "w41-e-lab-access"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "pro-human-coalition",
        "title": "The Pro-Human coalition: declaration to assembly",
        "description": "Follow endorsements, the March announcement and the advertised September event.",
        "boundary": "Organizer plans, endorsements and Coxon’s reported withdrawal have distinct labels. Attendance and outcomes of the September 15 event remain unobserved.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "fli",
            "title": "Future of Life Institute",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w42-declaration",
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Declaration",
            "sub": "Shared advocacy principles",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w42-bannon",
            "title": "Steve Bannon",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "miotti",
            "title": "Andrea Miotti",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "leahy",
            "title": "Connor Leahy",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "winga",
            "title": "Max Winga",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "alliance-secure-ai-action",
            "title": "Alliance for Secure AI Action",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w42-assembly",
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "sub": "Scheduled for September 15",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "jacob-coxon",
            "title": "Jacob Coxon",
            "sub": "Reported withdrawal; homepage mismatch",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-bernie",
            "title": "Bernie Sanders",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w30-class-blackburn",
            "title": "Marsha Blackburn",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w3-opp-bores",
            "title": "Alexander Bores — NY-12 candidate",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w42-e-release",
          "w42-e-bannon-endorses",
          "w42-e-controlai-endorses",
          "w42-e-miotti-endorses",
          "w42-e-leahy-endorses",
          "w42-e-winga-endorses",
          "w42-e-scheduled",
          "w42-e-builds-on",
          "w42-e-organizer",
          "w42-e-coxon-assembly",
          "w42-e-sanders-assembly",
          "w42-e-bannon-assembly",
          "w42-e-blackburn-assembly",
          "w42-e-bores-assembly"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "uk-ai-oversight-proposal",
        "title": "UK AI oversight: from recommendation to proposed powers",
        "description": "Follow the committee report to two proposed sets of decision rights.",
        "boundary": "A committee report, not an enacted AI Bill. Oversight and AISI functions could be combined; the map does not claim two new bodies.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w43-ai-jchr",
            "title": "Joint Committee on Human Rights",
            "sub": "Existing institution",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w43-ai-report",
            "title": "Human Rights and the Regulation of AI",
            "sub": "Report / proposed authority",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w43-ai-oversight-proposal",
            "title": "Proposed statutory oversight body",
            "sub": "Report / proposed authority",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-uk-aisi",
            "title": "AI Security Institute",
            "sub": "Existing institution",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w43-ai-e-adopted",
          "w43-ai-e-published",
          "w43-ai-e-oversight",
          "w43-ai-e-aisi"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "svangel-policy-access",
        "title": "SV Angel: the declared route to policy access",
        "description": "Follow an appointment, an initiative and its leadership mandate.",
        "boundary": "First-party announcement and intended policy engagement; no acquired project budget, official commitment or achieved law.",
        "topic": "Rules & government",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w44-net-svangel",
            "title": "SV Angel",
            "sub": "Venture firm / initiative owner",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w44-net-carney",
            "title": "Jay Carney",
            "sub": "Appointed policy partner",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w44-net-blueprint",
            "title": "Project Blueprint",
            "sub": "Announced policy initiative",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w44-net-e-appointment",
          "w44-net-e-initiative",
          "w44-net-e-leads"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ea-money-and-institutions",
        "title": "EA: money, media and new institutions",
        "description": "Follow funding into recruitment, new organizations and research capacity.",
        "boundary": "Grant recommendations, programme ownership and media promotion are different kinds of connection.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "Funder and programme designer",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-80k",
            "title": "80,000 Hours",
            "sub": "Media and career recruitment",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-tailwind",
            "title": "Project Tailwind",
            "sub": "Funds new founders",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-nadeau",
            "title": "Max Nadeau",
            "sub": "Grantmaker interviewed",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-resolution",
            "title": "Resolution",
            "sub": "$160m approved",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-redwood",
            "title": "Redwood Research",
            "sub": "Over $70m recommended",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-epoch",
            "title": "Epoch AI",
            "sub": "$68m recommended",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-egc",
            "title": "Effective Giving and Careers",
            "sub": "Policy-career funding",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-ipc",
            "title": "Impactful Policy Careers",
            "sub": "EU careers accelerator",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-need",
            "title": "Network for Effective Evidence-Based Development",
            "sub": "Development careers",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "svcf",
            "title": "Silicon Valley Community Foundation",
            "sub": "Foundation grantor",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w46-e-coefficient-80k",
          "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
          "w46-e-80k-tailwind",
          "w46-e-80k-nadeau",
          "w46-e-nadeau-coefficient",
          "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
          "w46-e-coefficient-redwood",
          "w46-e-coefficient-epoch",
          "w46-e-coefficient-egc",
          "w46-e-egc-ipc",
          "w46-e-egc-need",
          "w46-e-coefficient-need",
          "w46-e-svcf-need"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "ea-funds-and-lightcone",
        "title": "The EA fund split and Lightcone Commons",
        "description": "Follow the closing LTFF into Commons and the new Transformative AI Fund.",
        "boundary": "First-round contributions and spend-down amounts are announced intentions. Evaluators recommend; donors decide.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "tallinn",
            "title": "Jaan Tallinn",
            "sub": "Conditional $10m",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "moskovitz",
            "title": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "sub": "Tentative ~$5m",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-arm",
            "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "sub": "Tentative ~$2m",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-commons",
            "title": "Lightcone Commons",
            "sub": "Coordinates funding",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "lightcone-infrastructure",
            "title": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "sub": "Platform operator",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "yudkowsky",
            "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky",
            "sub": "Confirmed evaluator",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "nate-soares",
            "title": "Nate Soares",
            "sub": "Confirmed evaluator",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-habryka",
            "title": "Oliver Habryka",
            "sub": "Founder / evaluator",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-parikh",
            "title": "Caleb Parikh",
            "sub": "Fund manager / adviser",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w1-creator-ltff",
            "title": "Long Term Future Fund",
            "sub": "Closing fund",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-taif",
            "title": "Transformative AI Fund",
            "sub": "New seed fund",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-cea",
            "title": "Centre for Effective Altruism",
            "sub": "Institutional home",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-lundin",
            "title": "Lowe Lundin",
            "sub": "Head of new fund",
            "pos": [
              2,
              5,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w46-e-tallinn-commons",
          "w46-e-moskovitz-commons",
          "w46-e-arm-commons",
          "w46-e-commons-operator",
          "w46-e-yudkowsky-commons",
          "w46-e-soares-commons",
          "w46-e-habryka-commons",
          "w46-e-habryka-lightcone",
          "w46-e-parikh-commons",
          "w46-e-parikh-arm",
          "w46-e-parikh-ltff",
          "w46-e-habryka-ltff",
          "w46-e-ltff-commons",
          "w46-e-ltff-taif",
          "w46-e-cea-taif",
          "w46-e-lundin-taif",
          "w46-e-parikh-taif"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "irregular-funding-and-people",
        "title": "Irregular: money, people and career networks",
        "description": "Follow the evaluator into philanthropic grants, venture investment, EA career organizations and RAND research.",
        "boundary": "The Good Ventures and Coefficient arrows describe one grant. The MOOC is also one joint grant. Professional roles are distinct from funding.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "goodventures",
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "sub": "$6.8m grant record",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "Recommender / Heron funder",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-sequoia",
            "title": "Sequoia Capital",
            "sub": "Venture investor",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-redpoint",
            "title": "Redpoint Ventures",
            "sub": "Venture investor",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-irregular",
            "title": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "sub": "Security evaluator",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-lahav",
            "title": "Dan Lahav",
            "sub": "Co-founder / CEO",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-omer",
            "title": "Omer Nevo",
            "sub": "Co-founder / CTO",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-heron",
            "title": "Heron",
            "sub": "AI-security career network",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-ife",
            "title": "Impact Focused Education",
            "sub": "Impact education",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-pg",
            "title": "Probably Good",
            "sub": "Career advice",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-ea-israel",
            "title": "Effective Altruism Israel",
            "sub": "Board / project host",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-sella",
            "title": "Sella Nevo",
            "sub": "Research / education",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-rand",
            "title": "RAND Corporation",
            "sub": "Policy research",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-weights",
            "title": "RAND model-weights security report (2024)",
            "sub": "Model-security framework",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ea-infrastructure-fund",
            "title": "EA Infrastructure Fund",
            "sub": "Education grant",
            "pos": [
              0,
              5,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-mooc",
            "title": "Lahav–Nevo MOOC grant (2022)",
            "sub": "One joint $394,968 grant",
            "pos": [
              1,
              5,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w47-e-gv-grant",
          "w47-e-cg-recommendation",
          "w47-e-sequoia-investment",
          "w47-e-redpoint-investment",
          "w47-e-lahav-irregular",
          "w47-e-omer-irregular",
          "w47-e-omer-israel",
          "w47-e-omer-heron",
          "w47-e-israel-heron",
          "w47-e-cg-heron",
          "w47-e-omer-pg",
          "w47-e-sella-pg",
          "w47-e-lahav-ife",
          "w47-e-sella-ife",
          "w47-e-sella-rand",
          "w47-e-eaif-mooc",
          "w47-e-mooc-lahav",
          "w47-e-mooc-sella",
          "w47-e-lahav-weights",
          "w47-e-sella-weights",
          "w47-e-rand-weights"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "irregular-labs-and-oversight",
        "title": "Irregular: the labs, the incidents and the response",
        "description": "See the shared supplier, its lab relationships and the proposed response to testing failures.",
        "boundary": "This maps institutional relationships, not a single coordinated attack. The Hugging Face escape is a separate incident.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w47-sequoia",
            "title": "Sequoia Capital",
            "sub": "Venture capital",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-irregular",
            "title": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "sub": "Shared testing supplier",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "goodventures",
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "sub": "Earlier grant",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "deepmind",
            "title": "DeepMind",
            "sub": "Lab collaboration",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
            "title": "OpenAI",
            "sub": "Testing client",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "Testing client",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "meta",
            "title": "Meta",
            "sub": "Testing client, reported",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-guidance",
            "title": "Irregular cyber-evaluation guidance initiative",
            "sub": "Proposed testing guidance",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-metr",
            "title": "METR",
            "sub": "External incident review",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w47-e-sequoia-investment",
          "w47-e-gv-grant",
          "w47-e-irregular-openai",
          "w47-e-irregular-anthropic",
          "w47-e-irregular-deepmind",
          "w47-e-irregular-meta",
          "w47-e-irregular-guidance",
          "w47-e-openai-guidance",
          "w47-e-anthropic-metr"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "w48-cap-research-capacity",
        "title": "From funding to research and advice",
        "description": "Explore grants, research resources, people and the institutions using their work.",
        "boundary": "Credits, grants, professional roles and research engagements retain their own labels.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "moskovitz",
            "title": "Dustin Moskovitz",
            "sub": "Donor statements",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "Selects and supports research",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-tailwind",
            "title": "Project Tailwind",
            "sub": "Funds prospective founders",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-resolution",
            "title": "Resolution",
            "sub": "Base and conditional grant",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-epoch",
            "title": "Epoch AI",
            "sub": "Data and benchmark provider",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-redwood",
            "title": "Redwood Research",
            "sub": "Research and advisory work",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-cap-agent-foundations",
            "title": "Agent Foundations team",
            "sub": "Joined Resolution",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-cap-data-centers",
            "title": "AI Data Centers explorer",
            "sub": "Public research output",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-metr",
            "title": "METR",
            "sub": "Evaluator and collaborator",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-cap-irving",
            "title": "Geoffrey Irving",
            "sub": "Lab, government and nonprofit roles",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w34-sanders-openai",
            "title": "OpenAI",
            "sub": "Credits and benchmark work",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "deepmind",
            "title": "DeepMind",
            "sub": "Advisory and evaluation work",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-uk-aisi",
            "title": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "sub": "Research partnership",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-eu-ai-office",
            "title": "European AI Office",
            "sub": "Technical consultations",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w48-cap-e-openai-resolution",
          "w48-cap-e-resolution-team",
          "w48-cap-e-irving-resolution",
          "w48-cap-e-irving-aisi",
          "w48-cap-e-irving-openai",
          "w48-cap-e-irving-deepmind",
          "w48-cap-e-cg-epoch-tracker",
          "w48-cap-e-epoch-tracker",
          "w48-cap-e-epoch-eu",
          "w48-cap-e-epoch-metr",
          "w48-cap-e-epoch-openai",
          "w48-cap-e-epoch-deepmind",
          "w48-cap-e-redwood-deepmind",
          "w48-cap-e-redwood-aisi",
          "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-metr",
          "w48-cap-e-moskovitz-redwood",
          "w46-e-coefficient-resolution",
          "w46-e-coefficient-tailwind",
          "w46-e-coefficient-epoch",
          "w46-e-coefficient-redwood"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "embedded-evaluation-commercial-network",
        "title": "Anthropic: evaluator and commercial partner",
        "description": "Accenture and Faculty connect model assessment to an existing Claude business relationship.",
        "boundary": "The investment figures are expected capacity commitments; individual contract fees and independence provisions are not disclosed.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "anthropic",
            "title": "Anthropic",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-embedded",
            "title": "Anthropic embedded evaluation partnership",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-accenture",
            "title": "Accenture",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-framework",
            "title": "Anthropic Advanced AI Framework (June 2026)",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w16-supp-faculty",
            "title": "Faculty Science Limited",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-warner",
            "title": "Marc Warner",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-business-group",
            "title": "Accenture Anthropic Business Group",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-cyber-ai",
            "title": "Accenture Cyber.AI",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w48-eval-e-acquires",
          "w48-eval-e-warner-acc",
          "w48-eval-e-warner-faculty",
          "w48-eval-e-pays-evaluation",
          "w48-eval-e-acc-embedded",
          "w48-eval-e-faculty-embedded",
          "w48-eval-e-embedded-anthropic",
          "w48-eval-e-acc-business",
          "w48-eval-e-anthropic-business",
          "w48-eval-e-acc-cyber",
          "w48-eval-e-claude-cyber",
          "w48-eval-e-framework"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "pro-human-coalition-structure",
        "title": "Pro-Human AI Coalition: organization and shared capacity",
        "description": "Founders, executives and steering organizations around the new coalition.",
        "boundary": "The map separates founding, leadership, membership and website operation. These roles do not disclose particular veto or spending rights.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "fli",
            "title": "Future of Life Institute",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-project-liberty",
            "title": "Project Liberty",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-ergo",
            "title": "Ergo Impact",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "omidyar",
            "title": "Omidyar Network",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-coalition",
            "title": "Pro-Human AI Coalition",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-mila",
            "title": "Mila",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "aguirre",
            "title": "Anthony Nicholas Aguirre",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-tillemann",
            "title": "Tomicah Tillemann",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-galinsky",
            "title": "Lara Galinsky",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-mccourt",
            "title": "Frank McCourt",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-henderson",
            "title": "Max Henderson",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-eval-project-liberty-institute",
            "title": "Project Liberty Institute",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "controlai",
            "title": "ControlAI",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w11-fund-minderoo",
            "title": "Minderoo Foundation",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              1,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w42-assembly",
            "title": "Pro-Human Assembly — September 2026",
            "sub": "",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w48-eval-e-fli-cofounder",
          "w48-eval-e-pl-cofounder",
          "w48-eval-e-ergo-cofounder",
          "w48-eval-e-omidyar-steering",
          "w48-eval-e-mila-steering",
          "w48-eval-e-site-operator",
          "w48-eval-e-mccourt-pl",
          "w48-eval-e-aguirre-coal",
          "w48-eval-e-mccourt-coal",
          "w48-eval-e-tillemann-coal",
          "w48-eval-e-galinsky-coal",
          "w48-eval-e-henderson-ergo",
          "w48-eval-e-henderson-coal",
          "w48-eval-e-assembly-launch",
          "w48-eval-e-member-controlai",
          "w48-eval-e-member-w11-fund-minderoo"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "w48-commons-decisions",
        "title": "Grantmakers: who selects and who can refuse",
        "description": "Follow evaluator admission, fiscal approval and named research awards.",
        "boundary": "The September Corrigibility Fund awards are separate from the Commons pooled round scheduled for October23.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "w46-habryka",
            "title": "Oliver Habryka",
            "sub": "Admission and evaluation",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "lightcone-infrastructure",
            "title": "Lightcone Infrastructure",
            "sub": "Legal approval and platform",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-80k",
            "title": "80,000 Hours",
            "sub": "Podcast recruiting pathway",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-arm",
            "title": "AI Risk Mitigation Fund",
            "sub": "Programme move announced",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w46-commons",
            "title": "Lightcone Commons",
            "sub": "Allocation platform",
            "pos": [
              1,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-com-harms",
            "title": "Max Harms",
            "sub": "Fund manager",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w1-creator-ltff",
            "title": "Long-Term Future Fund",
            "sub": "Planned spend-down route",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-com-corrigibility",
            "title": "Corrigibility Research Fund",
            "sub": "Eight announced awards: $132k",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-com-kahn",
            "title": "Ian Kahn",
            "sub": "$35k award",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w48-com-saudek",
            "title": "Ben Saudek",
            "sub": "$3k award",
            "pos": [
              2,
              3,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w46-e-commons-operator",
          "w46-e-habryka-lightcone",
          "w46-e-habryka-commons",
          "w46-e-arm-commons",
          "w46-e-ltff-commons",
          "w48-com-e-lightcone-arm",
          "w48-com-e-lightcone-fund",
          "w48-com-e-harms-fund",
          "w48-com-e-fund-commons",
          "w48-com-e-fund-kahn",
          "w48-com-e-fund-saudek",
          "w48-com-e-80k-harms"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "irregular-government-contracts",
        "title": "Irregular: grants, contracts and commercial rights",
        "description": "Paid grant instalments, three government contracts, commercial rights and a safety-framework conference connect the evaluator to funders and public institutions.",
        "boundary": "The two grant payments comprise the existing $6.8m award. Contract values are commitments; the separate £153,000 ledger payment remains unassigned. Conference disclosure does not establish attendance.",
        "topic": "AI & money",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "id": "goodventures",
            "title": "Good Ventures",
            "sub": "Philanthropic grant",
            "pos": [
              0,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "coefficient",
            "title": "Coefficient Giving",
            "sub": "Grant recommendation",
            "pos": [
              1,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-sequoia",
            "title": "Sequoia Capital",
            "sub": "Venture investor",
            "pos": [
              2,
              0,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-redpoint",
            "title": "Redpoint Ventures",
            "sub": "Venture investor",
            "pos": [
              2,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w15-impl-dsit",
            "title": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
            "sub": "Government buyer",
            "pos": [
              0,
              1,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w41-uk-aisi",
            "title": "UK AI Security Institute",
            "sub": "Tests and threat models",
            "pos": [
              1,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w49-cyber-advisory-contract",
            "title": "AISI cyber and advisory contract (February 2024)",
            "sub": "£293,151 corrected award",
            "pos": [
              0,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w49-safeguards-contract",
            "title": "AISI attacks and safeguards contract (September 2024)",
            "sub": "£459,875 safeguards award",
            "pos": [
              1,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w47-irregular",
            "title": "Irregular / Pattern Labs",
            "sub": "Supplier and reusable know-how",
            "pos": [
              2,
              2,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w50-accessible-cyber-contract",
            "title": "AISI accessible cyber evaluations contract",
            "sub": "£459,000; help design the tests",
            "pos": [
              0,
              3,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w50-frontier-frameworks-conference",
            "title": "Safety-framework conference",
            "sub": "Named in invitation disclosure",
            "pos": [
              2,
              4,
              1
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "w50-govai",
            "title": "GovAI",
            "sub": "Conference co-organizer",
            "pos": [
              0,
              4,
              1
            ]
          }
        ],
        "edgeIds": [
          "w47-e-gv-grant",
          "w47-e-cg-recommendation",
          "w47-e-sequoia-investment",
          "w47-e-redpoint-investment",
          "w49-e-dsit-cyber-award",
          "w49-e-cyber-contractor",
          "w49-e-dsit-safeguards-award",
          "w49-e-safeguards-contractor",
          "w49-e-safeguards-tests",
          "w49-e-publication-control",
          "w49-e-security-approval",
          "w49-e-recorded-payment",
          "w49-e-dsit-aisi",
          "w50-e-gv-first-payment",
          "w50-e-gv-second-payment",
          "w50-e-grantee-report",
          "w50-e-accessible-award",
          "w50-e-accessible-supplier",
          "w50-e-accessible-methods",
          "w50-e-accessible-approval",
          "w50-e-accessible-qa",
          "w50-e-aisi-organizes",
          "w50-e-govai-organizes",
          "w50-e-irregular-invited",
          "w50-e-op-invited"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "researchWaves": [
      {
        "id": "w34-sanders-wave",
        "asOf": "2026-09-11",
        "title": "Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition"
      },
      {
        "id": "w35-ai-persuasion",
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "title": "Yudkowsky, creator outreach and the public AI debate"
      },
      {
        "id": "w36-tallinn",
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "title": "Jaan Tallinn: funding, persuasion and obligations"
      },
      {
        "id": "w37-power",
        "asOf": "2026-09-12",
        "title": "Money, audiences and decision rights"
      },
      {
        "id": "w38-news",
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "title": "Who gets to set the safety rules?"
      },
      {
        "id": "w39-news",
        "asOf": "2026-09-13",
        "title": "BASI: open research, venture grants and frontier-lab testing"
      },
      {
        "id": "w40-news",
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "title": "Public ownership and board power in AI"
      },
      {
        "id": "w41-evaluators",
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "title": "Evaluators, funders and AI decision rights"
      },
      {
        "id": "w42",
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "title": "Pro-Human coalition and September political responses"
      },
      {
        "id": "w43",
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "title": "Noon records: powers, safeguards and corrections"
      },
      {
        "id": "w44",
        "asOf": "2026-09-14",
        "title": "Evening records: access, advocacy and proposed rules"
      },
      {
        "id": "w45",
        "asOf": "2026-09-16",
        "title": "Interview records: sponsored warnings, family links and review rights"
      },
      {
        "id": "w46",
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "title": "EA: funding the institutions that shape AI"
      },
      {
        "id": "w47",
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "title": "Irregular: the evaluator behind the headlines"
      },
      {
        "id": "w48",
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "title": "Who gets to decide: funding, evaluators and organized campaigns"
      },
      {
        "id": "w49",
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "title": "Irregular: government contracts and commercial evaluation rights"
      },
      {
        "id": "w50",
        "asOf": "2026-09-19",
        "title": "Irregular: grant payments and government test design"
      },
      {
        "id": "w51",
        "asOf": "2026-09-20",
        "title": "The limits between a rule and its exercise"
      }
    ],
    "featureArticles": [
      {
        "slug": "yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power",
        "title": "Eliezer Yudkowsky: How a Warning Acquires Power",
        "deck": "An author, a funded institution, a political campaign—and the passage from predicting catastrophe to proposing who may prevent it.",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "people": [
          "yudkowsky",
          "miri",
          "nate-soares",
          "malo-bourgon",
          "rational",
          "controlai",
          "lesswrong",
          "lightcone-infrastructure",
          "w34-sanders-bernie",
          "coefficient",
          "vitalik",
          "sff",
          "tallinn",
          "fli"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The connection",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>In March 2026, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares joined other researchers to brief Bernie Sanders about superintelligent AI. Sanders released video of the meeting. MIRI, the organization they help lead, pointed its supporters toward the encounter. A warning had reached a senator's desk, with its authors in the room. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/\">MIRI's account</a></p>\n<p>That is an instructive place to begin. Public debate tends to give us personalities: the prophet, the crank, the visionary, the billionaire. Those labels are emotionally efficient and analytically lazy. What matters here is the machinery connecting a person's argument to resources, audiences, political access and proposed public powers.</p>\n<p>Yudkowsky occupies several of those positions simultaneously. Following them reveals something consequential about how policy becomes possible—and why a frightening prediction deserves especially careful scrutiny when someone asks us to build an enforcement system around it.</p>\n",
            "sources": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The institution and the money",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>MIRI, the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, dates its founding to 2000; it operated as the Singularity Institute until 2013. Its current roster places Yudkowsky under both Leadership and Board as co-founder. Malo Bourgon is CEO. Soares is president. Keeping those roles straight matters: intellectual prominence, board authority and daily executive responsibility are different kinds of power. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/transparency/\">MIRI history</a> · <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/team/\">Current team</a></p>\n<p>The institutional connection gives Yudkowsky's advocacy a durable home. An organization can hire people, retain knowledge, commission work and keep pursuing a problem after the news cycle has wandered off. To understand how that becomes possible, follow the money into the organization.</p>\n<p>MIRI's contributor acknowledgements, updated April 30, 2026, credit Open Philanthropy with approximately $15.93 million, Vitalik Buterin with $5.41 million, the Survival and Flourishing Fund with $3.37 million and Jaan Tallinn with $1.63 million. The Thiel Foundation appears among past contributors at $1.627 million; the Future of Life Institute is credited with $412,252. These are cumulative institutional support credits, including matching funds leveraged. They are not a September campaign budget, Yudkowsky's income or six receipts for the same political project. The page's “recent” category requires only some qualifying support within five years. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/topcontributors/\">MIRI's contributor list</a></p>\n<p>A separate 2021 announcement makes the scale tangible. An anonymous cryptocurrency investor donated 3,001 MKR tokens. MIRI says it sold them for $15,592,829, with spending capped at $2.5 million annually during 2021–2024 and the remaining $5.59 million becoming available in 2025. The same announcement records a distinct 1,050 ETH gift from Buterin. That specific gift must not be added again to his cumulative credit. The token's identity also does not make MakerDAO the donor. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2021/05/13/two-major-donations/\">The donation announcement</a></p>\n<p>An anonymous gift leaves a real accountability gap: we cannot inspect the donor's interests or relationships. We can still identify the recipient, reported proceeds and disclosed spending restriction. Guessing a name would make the investigation worse.</p>\n<p>This financial history explains capacity. It does not settle present allegiance. MIRI itself acknowledged in its December 2025 fundraising appeal that it did not know how many earlier donors would support its newer communications and governance work. An institution can carry resources from one phase of its mission into another. The interesting questions are which restrictions travel with the money, which expire, and who approves the new direction. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/\">MIRI's mission and fundraising account</a></p>\n",
            "sources": [],
            "mapId": "miri-money"
          },
          {
            "title": "A community, a book and a production channel",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>Money is one resource. A community that already understands your vocabulary is another.</p>\n<p>LessWrong's own history identifies Yudkowsky as its founder in 2009 and describes his writings as part of its philosophical foundation. Its FAQ records that the site began as MIRI property. Today, Lightcone Infrastructure lists LessWrong among the infrastructure it operates. This is a documented genealogy; it does not establish that Yudkowsky currently controls Lightcone. <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2rWKkWuPrgTMpLRbp/lesswrong-faq\">LessWrong FAQ</a> · <a href=\"https://www.lightconeinfrastructure.com/\">Lightcone</a></p>\n<p>Such a forum can do something a grant cannot do by itself: give people a shared language for identifying problems, evaluating arguments and finding collaborators. That is a plausible mechanism of intellectual influence, not proof that everyone who reads the same essays votes, works or thinks alike. A community can preserve an author's importance while arguing ferociously about what to do next.</p>\n<p>The video connection is unusually tangible. In October 2023, Rational Animations’ operator described four adaptations of Yudkowsky’s work, including <em>The Power of Intelligence</em> and <em>The Hidden Complexity of Wishes</em>. He said he had invited Yudkowsky into its production Discord to contribute ideas. That is a documented invitation and an adaptation history. It is not evidence that Yudkowsky writes most of the channel’s output. <a href=\"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NjtHt55nFbw3gehzY/announcing-miri-s-new-ceo-and-leadership-team\">The operator’s account</a></p>\n<p>An April 2026 interview with lead scriptwriter Alice Liu describes her own writing and Robert Miles’s substantial editorial input, alongside other writers. The channel has a production process, not just an author’s megaphone. An early $30,000 EA Infrastructure Fund award explicitly supported audience development; it predates the current campaign. <a href=\"https://inkhavenspotlight.substack.com/p/tides-are-weirder-than-you-think\">Liu’s interview</a> · <a href=\"https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/zAEC8BuLYdKmH54t7/ea-infrastructure-fund-may-2021-grant-recommendations\">The grant report</a></p>\n",
            "sources": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Turning an audience into political demand",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>The passage into organized public persuasion is more directly documented.</p>\n<p>Yudkowsky and Soares coauthored <em>If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies</em>. MIRI describes the book as central to its 2025 communications work, alongside public appearances and policymaker conversations. Its plans for 2026 included helping third parties use existing material with their own audiences, responding to news and maintaining relationships with allies and journalists. Those plans gained institutional muscle: by March, MIRI reported that its communications team had grown from five people to thirteen. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/\">MIRI's 2025 account</a> · <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2026/03/19/miri-newsletter-125/\">March 2026 update</a></p>\n<p>That is organized advocacy, described by the organization itself. It gives us grounds to investigate particular collaborations. It does not supply a universal explanation for every frightened researcher, viral post or sympathetic interview. The missing link in a specific case still has to be found.</p>\n<p>ControlAI supplies an unusually clear example of adoption. In September 2025, its newsletter promoted the book alongside its own campaign to prohibit superintelligence. The organization endorsed the authors' central prescription and directed readers to their work. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/the-campaign\">ControlAI's campaign announcement</a></p>\n<p>The influence extends to method. In a published account of briefing more than seventy UK lawmakers, ControlAI policy adviser Leticia García Martínez cited Yudkowsky's essay about inferential distance: the gap between what a speaker assumes and what an audience already understands. Her guidance also explains how to make arguments memorable enough for parliamentarians to repeat. Here is a concrete transmission path from a writer's account of reasoning into political persuasion. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/briefing-70-lawmakers-on-ai\">ControlAI's briefing guidance</a></p>\n<p>ControlAI then makes its own contribution. Its April 2026 strategy praises the book but distinguishes repeatable campaigning from exceptional individual successes. It explicitly compares its approach to sales funnels: brief lawmakers, seek public support, measure subsequent statements, improve conversion. The proposed $50 million annual budget is an expansion scenario, not evidence it received or spent that amount. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/blog/prevent-asi-plan\">ControlAI's strategy</a></p>\n<p>There is a direct connection to the incident that started this investigation. On September 8, ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved in Sabine Hossenfelder’s disputed sponsorship approach. It also named Rational Animations as a sponsored partner. Those are separate facts; they do not make every adaptation a commissioned campaign script. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI’s account</a></p>\n<p><a href=\"/stories/controlai-sabine-offer\">Read both accounts of the Sabine offer, and what remains unresolved →</a></p>\n<p>This explains why counting famous names is insufficient. Authors supply arguments. Campaign staff translate them for an audience. Supporters provide public legitimacy. Policymakers can turn the resulting pressure into decisions. Each transition is a place where the message may change—and where responsibility needs a name.</p>\n<p>The Sanders meeting belongs in that sequence as documented access. It establishes an opportunity to inform and persuade him. We have not established that Yudkowsky or Soares drafted the later Sanders/Casar legislation. A photograph or briefing can demonstrate proximity; authorship requires evidence of authorship.</p>\n",
            "sources": [],
            "mapId": "yudkowsky-persuasion"
          },
          {
            "title": "What happens when the answer becomes enforceable?",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>The stakes become sharper when persuasion reaches enforcement.</p>\n<p>In his March 2023 TIME essay, Yudkowsky rejected a six-month AI pause as insufficient. He advocated an indefinite international halt to large training runs, including government and military work, and willingness to destroy unauthorized foreign datacenters by airstrike despite nuclear-escalation risk. He tentatively allowed narrowly biological AI. This was his dated proposal, not enacted law, and its target was infrastructure—not a policy of executing researchers. The extremity is consequential enough without embellishment. <a href=\"https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/\">Yudkowsky's authored essay</a></p>\n<p>The institutional policy work also deserves examination on its own terms. MIRI says its technical-governance team collaborated with Yudkowsky, Soares and others on an annotated treaty, then developed a formal international-agreement proposal. The later agreement’s May 2026 version names Aaron Scher, David Abecassis, Peter Barnett and Brian Abeyta as its authors. Yudkowsky’s documented collaboration on the earlier annotated treaty is a different attribution. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/2025/12/01/miris-2025-fundraiser/\">MIRI's account</a></p>\n<p>The later design proposes an executive council initially comprising the United States and China, technical oversight, compute restrictions and inspections. It would restrict certain AI research as well as large training runs, because algorithmic progress could undermine compute-only limits. Article XII would allow member states to undertake necessary and proportionate protective action on credible evidence of specified prohibited activity, including cyber sabotage and military destruction of AI infrastructure. Less coercive approaches ordinarily come first, with exceptions for emergencies and time-sensitive situations. The Executive Council reviews each action, but the article does not expressly require its prior approval. Safeguards include public reasons when security permits, limits on collateral harm qualified by mission requirements, and conditions requiring action to cease. These safeguards matter; so does the extraordinary authority being proposed. This remains a research proposal, not a signed treaty or an authority already conferred on MIRI. <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/html/2511.10783v3\">Agreement, version 3</a></p>\n<p>Nor does the surrounding field agree on one blueprint. ControlAI's own strategy criticizes approaches centered on evaluation or positioning trusted insiders, and favors public mobilization toward international prohibition. It even notes Yudkowsky's shift from an earlier approach toward public awareness. Shared concern about extinction coexists with disputes over institutions, strategy and who should act. <a href=\"https://controlai.org/designing-the-dip\">ControlAI's comparison</a></p>\n",
            "sources": []
          },
          {
            "title": "Conviction does not settle permission",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>MIRI’s own guidance calls for honesty and cautions against manipulation. It recommends Rational Animations while explicitly declining to imply agreement on everything. That belongs in this account: a claim that its public doctrine licenses any lie would contradict its stated position. Testing conduct against that position is a legitimate investigation. <a href=\"https://intelligence.org/take-action/\">MIRI’s guidance</a></p>\n<p>The difficult issue is the relationship between conviction and permission.</p>\n<p>A person who believes everyone is about to die may sincerely regard sweeping intervention as a moral obligation. Sincerity does not determine whether the prediction is right. Nor does it answer who should decide, what evidence should be sufficient, which people bear the costs, or how a mistaken decision can be reversed.</p>\n<p>Those questions become more urgent as the claimed stakes rise. If ordinary disagreement is interpreted as willingness to gamble with humanity, the space for legitimate opposition can shrink very quickly. A public institution must remain answerable to people who reject its founding premise. Otherwise its safety case becomes a demand for obedience.</p>\n<p>We should ask of these proposals what we would ask of any consequential system: identify the authority, its limits, its evidence, its appeal process and the means of stopping its misuse. Publish the grant purposes. Name the drafters. Expose the decisions to independent challenge. Keep the distinction between expertise and permission to govern visible.</p>\n<p>Yudkowsky is a keystone in this part of RED THREADS because ideas, institutional resources, advocacy and political access meet around his work. That is a judgment about his connecting roles, not a claim that he secretly runs the whole network.</p>\n<p>The public has every right to examine what happens at those connections. A warning can deserve a hearing. The power requested in its name still has to earn our consent.</p>\n",
            "sources": []
          }
        ],
        "feature": true,
        "byline": "By Nova · RED THREADS · 12 September 2026"
      },
      {
        "slug": "controlai-sabine-offer",
        "title": "ControlAI says it was behind the approach to Sabine Hossenfelder",
        "deck": "The unnamed sponsorship approach that started this investigation has an identified participant. The editorial dispute is still unresolved.",
        "area": "AI & money",
        "people": [
          "sabine-hossenfelder",
          "controlai",
          "winga",
          "miotti",
          "rational"
        ],
        "sections": [
          {
            "title": "The important update",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>In her September 5 video, Sabine Hossenfelder said an AI-risk organization offered sponsorship but sought to specify the topic, sentences and references. She says she refused. The offeror was unnamed in that passage; she discussed ControlAI separately. <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdmYMHrWKg&amp;t=123s\">Her video, around 2:03</a></p>\n<p>On September 8, <strong>ControlAI identified itself as the organization involved</strong>. Andrea Miotti and Max Winga’s response disputes her description and says the negotiations went through her manager. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI’s response</a></p>\n<p>That moves the investigation forward. We can attach the approach to an organization that publicly acknowledges it. We cannot settle the competing descriptions without the correspondence.</p>\n",
            "sources": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The point they dispute",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>Hossenfelder describes attempted control over what she would say. ControlAI describes standard sponsorship conditions, editorial input over the ad, and generally nonbinding review of the main script. Its stated conditions include no AI-company endorsement and a required citation to one of two risk statements. It says sponsorship is disclosed. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">ControlAI’s partnership policy and account</a></p>\n<p>A sponsor can influence a message without writing every sentence. Choosing the topic, choosing sympathetic creators, selecting the required authority and deciding what production to fund can all shape what reaches the public. Those are mechanisms worth examining even when the speaker sincerely agrees and a sponsorship label is visible.</p>\n<p>The narrower factual question is what happened in this negotiation. A policy published afterward cannot substitute for the exchanged messages. Equally, a disagreement about requested changes does not establish a secret completed payment.</p>\n",
            "sources": [],
            "mapId": "controlai-sabine"
          },
          {
            "title": "Why this belongs in the power map",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>ControlAI connects creator partnerships to asking viewers to contact lawmakers. It names Rational Animations as a sponsored partner; no amount is provided. <a href=\"https://blog.controlai.org/p/controlais-creator-outreach\">The organization’s account</a></p>\n<p>This matters because a video can perform two jobs: explain a technical concern and recruit support for a political remedy. Viewers should be able to distinguish the speaker’s judgment, the sponsor’s requirements and the action being requested. “Sponsored” tells us money is involved. It does not, on its own, explain the editorial arrangement.</p>\n<p>This is also why we distinguish influence from command. The evidence supports an organized campaign and a disputed approach. It does not establish that all creators covering AI risk share a sponsor, that Hossenfelder accepted this arrangement, or that every warning is insincere.</p>\n",
            "sources": []
          },
          {
            "title": "The evidence that would settle more",
            "text": [],
            "html": "<p>The useful next records are ordinary business documents: the initial offer, proposed agreement, submitted script, requested revisions, cancellation terms and the exchange through the manager. With dates and both sides represented, these could establish what was required, what was optional and where the accounts diverge. Their absence is a gap, not a confession.</p>\n<p>RED THREADS began with the question of who was influencing the influencers. Here we now have a named participant. The next question is what that participant was buying—and what the audience could see.</p>\n<p><a href=\"/stories/yudkowsky-how-a-warning-acquires-power\">Read how Yudkowsky’s work connects institutions, creators and policymakers →</a></p>\n",
            "sources": []
          }
        ],
        "feature": true,
        "byline": "By Nova · RED THREADS · 12 September 2026"
      }
    ]
  }
}